HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-06-20 City Council Regular Meeting PacketAgenda
City Council Meeting
City of Edina, Minnesota
Edin a City Hall Coun cil Cham be rs
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
7:00 PM
I.Call To Order
II.Roll Call
III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda
IV.Community Comment
During "Community Comment," the City Council will inv ite residents
to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the
past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future
consideration. Individua ls must limit their comments to three
minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of spea kers on the same
issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally spea king, items
tha t are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed
during Community Comment. Indiv iduals should not expect the
Ma y or or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the
Council might refer the ma tter to sta) for consideration at a future
meeting.
V.Adoption Of Consent Agenda
All agenda items listed on the consent agenda a re considered
routine and will be ena cted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed
from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such
ca ses the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent
Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members
present to approve.)
A.Approval of June 6, 2017 Work Session Minutes and June 6,
2017 Regular Meeting Minutes
B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Da ted 6/01/2017
T OT AL: $736,411.16 And Per Pre-List Dated 6/08/2017 TOTAL:
$879,888.93 And Credit Ca rd T ransactions 3/28/2017-4/25/2017
T OT AL: $46,243.10
C.2017-2018 City Insurance Renewals Approva l
D.Liability Coverage Sta tutory Limits
E.Request for Purcha se: Braemar Golf Course - 2018 Golf Car
Lease
F.Final Rezoning & Site Plan and Site Improvement Performance
Agreement - Resolution No. 2017-60 & Ordinance No. 2017-05
Edina Market Street LLC.
G.Resolution No. 2017-66: Fiscal Year 2018 - 2020 Joint
Cooperation Agreement/Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Renewal
H.Approve TraGc Sa fety Report of May 3, 2017
I.Request for Purcha se: Server Replacement
J.Request for Purcha se: Microsoft Enterprise Agreement
K.Approve Master Serv ices Agreement with SRF Consulting
Group, Inc.
L.T ransfer Property at 4416 Valley View Road to the E dina
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
M.Resolution No. 2017-67: Approv ing Special La w
N.Request for Purcha se: Authorize Consultant Services for
Goodpointe Technology
VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations
A.Accept Comprehensiv e Annual Financial Report (CAFR) For Year
Ended December 31, 2016
B.May "Speak Up, Edina" Presentation
VII.Public Hearings
During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony
after City sta) members ma ke their presentations. If y ou wish to
testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long a s your
testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all
speakers and to allow the eGcient conduct of a public hearing,
speakers must observe the following guidelines:
Indiv iduals must limit their testimony to three minutes. T he Mayor
may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks
or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the
matter under considera tion.
In order to maintain a respectful environment for a ll those in
attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any
other form of verbal or nonv erbal communication is not allowed.
A.PUBLIC HEARING: CertiJcation of Abatement of Public Health
Nuisance, Resolution No. 2017-61
B.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2017-63 Conditional Use
Permit for Jesus Celebra tion Church, 6879 Wa shington Avenue
C.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2017-62 & Ordina nce No.
2017-06 Zoning Ordina nce Amendment & Preliminary Site Plan
Rev iew; 5109-25 West 49th Street, Great Oa ks & T E Miller
Dev elopment
D.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2017-68 Adopting a
ModiJcation to the Redev elopment Plan for the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Project Area; and Esta blishing the 50th
and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District Therein and
Adopting a Tax Increment Financing Plan Therefor
VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Fav orable vote of majority of Council
Members present to approv e except where noted)
A.Proposed Sale of and Redev elopment Agreement for 3925,
3930 and 3944 Ma rket Street
B.Resolution 2017-64: Identifying the Need for Liv able
Communities Demonstra tion Account Funding and Authorizing
Applications for Gra nt Funds
C.Resolution No. 2017-65: Approv ing Grants a nd Donations
IX.Correspondence And Petitions
A.Receive Petition Opposing Athletic Fields At Fred Richards Park
B.Correspondence
C.Minutes
1.Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, March 23, 2017
2.Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, February 23, 2017
3.Minutes: Arts & Culture Commission, April 27, 2017
4.Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission, May 11, 2017
5.Minutes: Edina Pa rks & Recreation Commission, May 9,
2017
6.Minutes: Herita ge Preserv ation Commission, May 9, 2017
X.Av ia tion Noise Update
XI.Ma y or And Council Comments
XII.Ma nager's Comments
XIII.Schedule of Meetings a nd E v ents as of June 20, 2017
XIV.Adjournment
The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortabl e bei ng part of the
publi c proc ess . If you need as s is tanc e i n the way of heari ng am pli Jc ation, an
interpreter, large-print doc um ents or s om ethi ng els e, pleas e c al l 952-927-8861
72 ho urs in advance of the m eeting.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Approval of June 6, 2017 Wo rk S es s ion Minutes and
June 6, 2017 R egular Meeting Minutes
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve minutes as presented.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Draft June 6, 2017 Work Ses s ion Minutes
Draft June 6, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes
MINUTES
OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 16, 2017
5:31 P.M.
Mayor Hovland called the work session of the Edina City Council to order at 5:31 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Answering roll call were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland.
Edina City Staff attending the meeting: Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner; Jeff Brown, Community
Health Administrator; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Chante Mitchell,
City Management Fellow; Scott Neal, City Manager; Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner; Lisa
Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; and Cary Teague, Community Development Director.
Also attending the meeting was Bill Smith, Biko Associates.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Planning Commissioners attending the meeting were: Chair JoAnn Olsen, Vice Chair Ian Nmerov,
Members Gerry Stauss, Todd Thorsen, Steven Hobbs, Susan Lee, Jimmy Bennett, Sheila Berube and
John Hamilton.
Mr. Smith summarized the results of the following meetings: Mapping Edina’s Big Ideas meetings
held April 19, 2017 and April 22, 2017, Boards and Commissions Workshop held May 3, 2017,
Community Kickoff Meeting held May 8, 2017, 44th & France Small Are Plan Work Group Meetings
held May 15, 2017, and May 30, 2017.
Mr. Smith also outlined a possible process for selecting “Big Ideas” to incorporate into small area
plans and the Comprehensive Plan Update. The Council and Planning Commission members
discussed including: need to follow the existing Comp Plan layout while incorporating sustainability
and health in all things, imperative that guiding principles be well documented, the concept of nodes
and modes to be considered in redevelopment, transportation and flexibility, affordable housing and
equity all have importance in the development of the next Comprehensive Plan. There will be several
check-ins with the Council as work progresses on the Plan.
COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION JOINT MEETING:
Community Health Commissioners attending the meeting were: Chair Britta Orr, Vice Chair Alison
Pence, Members, Steve Sarles, Caleb Schultz, Constance Weston, Greg Write and Chisty Zilka.
The Commissioner reviewed their progress to date on the 2017 work plan initiatives including: 1)
Edina Public Schools Wellness Initiative; 2) the adoption of the Tobacco 21 ordinance raising the age
when individuals may purchase tobacco products in Edina. The Council thanked the Commission for
their work on this initiative and noted several surrounding communities are investigating a similar
ordinance. 3) Involvement in the City’s Comprehensive Plan update, 4) Joint work with the Planning
Commission regarding temporary family health care dwellings, and 5) the Commission’s ongoing
responsibility with regard to Public Health annual contracts.
The Council thanked the Community Health Commission for their hard work.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:57 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Minutes/Edina City Council Work Session/April 4, 2017
2
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 20, 2017.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Page 1
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 6, 2017
7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m.
II. ROLLCALL
Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland.
III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED
Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, approving the meeting
agenda as presented.
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT
Mayor Hovland reviewed the purpose for Community Comment and that the opportunity will not
be used as an impromptu public hearing regarding 54th Avenue and the waterfall issue.
Stan Davis, 5590 Woodcrest Drive, commented on the lack of communication surrounding the
decision to remove the dam that allows the waterfall to exist at 54th Avenue.
Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, shared concerns regarding the FEMA flood zone in this area and the
potential for possible litigation.
Adam Gildner, 5436 Brookview, shared concerns regarding the loss of neighborhood identify if the
waterfall was removed.
Chris Beutz, 5324 Kellogg Avenue, said the Arden Park use was adjacent to residential areas and
that usage could be extreme and result in segregation in this small area.
Morey Hartman, 5417 Woodcrest, said he enjoyed the beauty and rare treasure of the waterfall
and expressed disappointment in its loss. He said the waterfall was a community asset, should be
valued, and while he agreed with the Arden Parks project, the City should retain the waterfall.
A resident speaker using her phone shared a photo of the waterfall.
James Wisker, Director of Planning and Projects, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, shared the
District’s purpose and proposed plans for Arden Park and said their staff was present to listen to
resident concerns. He explained dams are not good for stream health and provided information
to the Council to share with the public. Mr. Wisker noted their staff will hold a meeting prior to
June 20 to share further information and said while they are not hard selling this project they will
look to the City to help move the project forward. Mr. Wisker said there was little point to the
project if the dam and waterfall remain but noted they could still complete the rest of the project.
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 6, 2017
Page 2
He expressed disappointment regarding recent email efforts to County Commissioners that
disparaged the Watershed staff.
Steve Sando, 5133 Juanita Avenue, shared concerns regarding Arden Park plans and said the
Steering Committee of the Arden Park Neighborhood Association commented on removal of the
dams and its benefits.
Mayor Hovland encouraged residents to attend the Watershed’s informational meeting to learn
more about the project prior to June 20 and to work with the Watershed District to understand
efforts to ensure clean water and improve regional storm runoff and fisheries.
Mark Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, expressed concerns about placement of the new
crosswalk at 69th Avenue and Valley View Road and asked why it was lighted on the west side
when the cross street was on the east side of the road.
Frank Lorenz, 7151 York Avenue South, shared concerns surrounding the need to hire additional
police and fire personnel based on the recent safety study recommendation.
Engineer Chad Millner addressed Mr. Chamberlain’s comments regarding sidewalk placement and
explained a row of trees limited sidewalk location due to proper sight line distances. He offered to
meet with Mr. Chamberlain to review and ensure lights were functioning properly.
V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS PRESENTED
Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent
agenda as presented:
V.A. Approve minutes of May 16, 2017, work session meeting, May 16, 2017, Regular
Council meeting, and May 26, 2017, work session meeting
V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on pre-list dated May 11,
2017, and consisting of 36 pages; General Fund $322,561.60, Police Special Revenue
$17,833.41, Pedestrian And Cyclist Safety $274.00, Working Capital Fund $8,841.40,
PIR Construction Fund $14,195.25, Art Center Fund $5,531.80, Golf Dome Fund
$1,683.84, Aquatic Center Fund $1,398.31, Golf Course Fund $269,698.87, Ice Arena
Fund $37,300.93Sports Dome Fund $4,311.29, Edinborough Park Fund $3,386.65,
Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,824.23, Liquor Fund $299,715.58, Utility Fund
$88,613.00, Storm Sewer Fund $3,809.01, Risk Mgmt ISF $5,902.39, PSTF Agency
Fund $58,674.84, MN Task Force 1 Fund$ 11,020.43, Centennial TIF District $625.00,
Southdale 2 District $35.00, Payroll Fund $2,813.35 Total $1,162.050.18; Pre-List
dated May 18, 2017 consisting of 37 pages; General Fund $193,195.45, Braemar
Memorial Fund $19,738.62, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $2,565.00, General Debt
Service Fund $450.00, Working Capital Fund $12,047.93, PIR Construction Fund
$146,146.35, Equipment Replacement Fund $83,705.85, Art Center Fund $1,891.67,
Golf Dome Fund $1,805.79, Aquatic Center Fund $1,599.05, Golf Course Fund
$95,823.91, Ice Arena Fund $15,387.30, Sports Dome Fund $10,829.51, Edinborough
Park Fund $3,912.20, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $4,929.47, Liquor Fund
$195,572.44, Utility Fund $614,698.96, Storm Sewer Fund $21,224.94, Recycling Fund
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 6, 2017
Page 3
$38,181.96, Risk Mgmt ISF $855.00, PSTF Agency Fund $1,220.26, Centennial TIF
District $7,062.00, Payroll Fund $4,581.11 Total $1,477,424.77; and pre-list dated
May 25, 2017 consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $163,221.44, Police Special
Revenue $1,270.24, Arts And Culture Fund $30.18, Working Capital Fund $37,272.35,
PIR Construction Fund $42,954.54, Equipment Replacement Fund $7,705.00, Art
Center Fund $1,281.02, Aquatic Center Fund $209.15, Golf Course Fund $9,199.28, Ice
Arena Fund $8,386.79, Sports Dome Fund $6,336.00, Edinborough Park Fund
$6,639.30, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $10,157.42, Liquor Fund $206,639.16, Utility
Fund $223,889.31, Storm Sewer Fund $26,875.91, PSTF Agency Fund $10,464.78, MN
Task Force 1 Fund $19,772.27, Centennial TIF District $30.00, South Dale 2 District
275.00; Total $782,609.14
V.C. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Jensen Press, $8,695 plus $200 ad credit
V.D. Adopt Resolution No. 2017-55, Authorizing the City of Edina to Enter Into a Public
Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Project Agreement with the Minnesota
Department of Health
V.E. Approve Amendment of Contract with City of Bloomington for Public Health
Emergency Preparedness Services
V.F. Set Public Hearing Date for Street Name Change for July 18, 2017
V.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2017-57: Application for Bridge Funds, Wooddale Avenue over
Minnehaha Creek
V.H. Approve Amendment 1 to Cooperative Agreement with Metropolitan Council for
Meter 129
V.I. Approve Change Order: Contract ENG 16-2 Golf Terrace B Neighborhood
Reconstruction
V.J. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Authorize Consultant Services for Passenger Rail Community Engagement Report,
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. $29,590.00
V.K. Reject Bid – Contract 17-2: Chowen Park D Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction,
G.L. Contracting in the amount of $346,308.80
V.L. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Contract ENG 17-8NB Valley View Road Rear Yard Retaining Wall Removal, JTS
Construction, $30,062.00
V.M. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Caterpillar Skid Steer, Public Works – Streets, Ziegler Cat $141,042
V.N. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
2016 Ford F550 with Stainless Steel Box, Midway Ford, $62,840
V.O. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Dublin Reservoir, Two Pump Rehabilitations, Keys Well Drilling, $18,730.00
V.P. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Contract ENG 17-12 York Avenue and W. 66th Street Intersection Improvements,
Meyer Contracting, $521,334.75
V.Q. Approve Easement Offer to Superior Storage, LLC over Outlot A, Superior Storage
$10,000
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 6, 2017
Page 4
V.R. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Well #9 Building Remodel, American Liberty Construction, Inc. $407,400.00
V.S. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Well #11 Emergency Pump, E.H. Renner and Sons, Inc., $24,053.00
V.T. Approve Service Contract: Lightspeed Point of Sale, $30,756.86
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
Manager Neal introduced Management Fellow Chante Mitchell who shared her background as a
student at the University of Kansas and stated she looked forward to working in Edina over this
upcoming year.
VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
VI.A. EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: PRESENTATION ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT –
RECEIVED
Explore Minnesota representative Rob Gruman and Edina Chamber of Commerce Executive
Director Lori Syverson said they have developed a proposed economic development strategy to
increase revenue, job growth, and business retention. They shared background and proposed
opportunities for Edina and stated the main purpose was to form a medical/wellness work group
and strategic and development plans to attract additional medical uses, build outreach to retain
business, and create a medical incubator.
The Council asked questions regarding lack of fast approval process, importance to connect
economic impact with the comprehensive process and the importance of mental health options.
The Council inquired about the proposed timeframe and requested proforma information for
2018-2019 consideration.
Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, nominating Manager Neal
to the Work Group.
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS – (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members
present to approve except where noted).
VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-58: AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION FUNDS,
SERIES 2017A – ADOPTED
Assistant Finance Director Kyle Sawyer stated the proposed resolution authorizes bonds to be
issued by the City to be paid from water and sewer revenues. He reviewed reductions in the
request of $8,590,000 in General Obligation Bonds Series A and General Obligation Bonds Series B
of $7,425,000 due to bidding and Channel Park D reconstruction.
Nick Anhut, Ehlers and Associates, explained how fewer funds are needed due to favorable
bidding with a trade-off of assigned higher interest for more up-front funds now. He stated the
premium was not needed as projected, which reduced the principal to align for project costs
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 6, 2017
Page 5
needs. Mr. Anhut congratulated the City on the process, affirmed its AAA bond rating, and said
they received seven bids on Series A with highest bid from UBS of Switzerland of 1.922% repaid
over 15-16 years and eight bids on Series B bonds with highest bid from Raymond James and
Associates of Florida at 2.26%.
Council commented on the process and complimented the work of Ehlers and Associates.
Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-58 authorizing
issuance, awarding sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of
$8,590,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2017A. Member Brindle seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VII.B. RESOLUTION 2017-59: AWARDING THE SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION
RECREATIONAL REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2017B - ADOPTED
Member Stewart introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-59 authorizing
issuance, awarding sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of
$7, 425,000 General Obligation Recreational Revenue Bonds, Series 2017B. Member Brindle
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VII.C. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE; BRAEMAR PARK MASTER PLAN CONSULTANT – SRF
APPROVED
Parks and Recreation Director Ann Kattreh stated this resolution would authorize hiring SRF to
perform the Braemar Park Master Plan consulting services in the amount of $55,003.
The Council asked questions regarding stakeholder and winter recreation process and
participation by many members of the community including mountain bike and Nordic ski users as
they were critical to the Park’s success and the need to focus on neighbors through the
community engagement process. Ms. Kattreh shared the community engagement process plan,
which was robust and significant as this was the largest park in Edina and the opportunity to make
something special. She outlined stakeholder meetings and how reduction of the golf course from
27 holes to 18 will allow for new uses for the broader community.
Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to approve request for
purchase for Braemar Park Master Plan Consultant as SRF in the amount of $55,003.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VII.D. SKETCH PLAN: ESTELLE EDINA – REVIEWED
Community Development Director Cary Teague Presentation
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 6, 2017
Page 6
Mr. Teague explained the proposed project at the southwest corner of France Avenue and 69th
Street to re-develop 3.9 acres of land into 158 new owner-occupied units, including the six
townhomes, 15,000 square feet of new retail, including a restaurant and two banks, a public plaza,
and pedestrian and vehicle connections through the site consistent with the Re-Visioning the
Southdale District Plan.
Proponent Presentation
Mike Ryan, Ryan Companies, Carl Runk, Ryan Companies, and Luigi Bernardy, President of Arcadia
and France, shared their backgrounds as well as the development proposal, design, and visual
imagery for this project. They highlighted how the plan would break up the block into
manageable pieces with a promenade west idea focused on pedestrian orientation. They also
outlined underground parking, proposed streets to bisect the block and the hope that future
developments would be continued in four quadrants with an established plinth.
Mr. Ryan presented the 5,000-square foot public plaza, phased development, sidewalks along
France Avenue, and setbacks heavily treed and landscaped to set the tone for a pedestrian
environment. He also presented the outdoor seating area plan, public plaza, slenderness of towers
at 24 stories, and project and shadow impacts. Mr. Ryan commented on the rationale of this plan
versus an office building, sustainability, enhanced neighborhood values, and low traffic impacts.
The Council complimented the applicants on how the project addressed the guiding principles in
breaking up the mega-block, how the design engaged the street with restaurants, outdoor
amenities, and a pedestrian experience. The Council shared concerns regarding height in this
location as the City expected the area to be transitional but indicated if the adjacent
neighborhood would accept the proposed height, the Council could get comfortable. It was
suggested this concept be used at other locations such as the promenade that may work better
with regard to scale. The Council expressed concerns regarding transition and site design with the
affordable housing investment policy aspect and the importance of continued vitality. The Council
acknowledged the height allowed for more greenspace and connectivity, which contributed to the
public realm, but height and density was too much.
VII.E. GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA WORK GROUP: PHASE 2 WRAP UP – RECEIVED
Mr. Teague introduced Michael Schroeder, Vice Chair of the Southdale Area Work Group to review
wrap up of Phase 2 of the Greater Southdale Area Work Group’s community outreach efforts and
next steps for Phases 3 and 4.
Mr. Schroeder presented a summary of the community outreach completed in Phase 2 of the
Southdale Area planning process and highlighted next steps to incorporate the Southdale Area
Planning Study into the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. He defined the work group framed
around a dialogue for Council with adopted working principles and that Stage 2 focused on
engaging residents and other stakeholders. Mr. Schroeder said they engaged a consultant to help
shape the Southdale Area and principles were intended to be a discussion point, not a binary
decision. Mr. Schroeder reviewed steps to date and how the focus changed to higher and
broader, not on specifics or development proposals, but to create models for how development
was measured to get what the City wants instead of what was brought to the City. He
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 6, 2017
Page 7
recommended the work group be allowed to continue work in Phases 3 and 4 to frame a dialogue,
work on new models, and encourage thought about what the greater Southdale area can be,
which was somewhere between urban and suburban.
The Council asked questions regarding principles used, reasons for a consultant, and if the work
would be part of the Comprehensive Plan update. Mr. Teague noted the Southdale Area would be
a significant chapter in Comprehensive Plan and if led by the work group with a consultant, it
would help formulate goals and policies. The Council agreed that the Southdale Area was a very
large area and complimented the work group on its good work that identified best practices. The
Council noted it was important to conclude the project and transition to rules instead of
exceptions and that further definition was needed regarding character in the area led by
community members with consultants used as resources and not leading the process.
Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to accept the Southdale
Area Phase 2 report and authorize staff to work with Work Group to design Phase 3.
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VII.F. NORTHEAST EDINA TRANSPORTATION STUDY UPDATE – RECEIVED
Engineer Chad Millner stated the Northeast Edina Transportation Study was part of the preliminary
approval of the Market Street Project and the Council requested further review of traffic and
pedestrian facilities in this area. He presented findings of the review for discussion that included
the Country Club, 50th and France, White Oaks, Morningside, and Arden Park and stated traffic
concerns dated back to 1950 with studies since 1993. Mr. Millner reviewed traffic and speed
trends, discussed tools such as limiting left hand turns and adding left turn lanes at 50th and
France, property impacts, and the need for multi-jurisdictional work with Minneapolis and
Hennepin County. He noted traffic had been consistent in this area since the 2006 study and 30%
of traffic was diverted through neighborhoods at about 9-10 cars each hour. Mr. Millner indicated
speeds were consistent within the legal limits of 30 mph. He reviewed traffic calming
opportunities and stated the SRF Market Street Study would be before the Council on June 20.
The Council commented that traffic issues in these neighborhoods were due to people finding the
fastest route, not due to businesses in the area. The Council asked if continued work to divert
traffic by 50th and France would not make matters worse and why volumes decreased from 2006-
2014. Mr. Millner noted volumes were actually steady with a 5% change over time and 70% of
traffic was from the neighborhoods, even with the dramatic change in the area. He stated traffic
issues have existed for many years and staff would continue to take requests from residents for
review by the Traffic Safety Committee.
Mr. Millner clarified this project was not contributing to traffic concerns and based on the study,
nothing would be required by an applicant for Market Street traffic and they would work with
Minneapolis and Hennepin County to add left-turn arrows at Market Street. He said pedestrian
safety was a priority in 50th/France and pavement markings could be done but pedestrian ramps
and neck downs would be greater projects as part of an overall France Avenue reconstruction in
the future.
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 6, 2017
Page 8
The Council commented on the downward trend over 20 years. Mr. Millner explained this was
similar to France Avenue and SRF reported 70% of traffic had destinations in the area. He
reviewed where cars were exiting, discovered via video studies and general counts that created
percentages. Mr. Millner noted that Maple, Bruce, Arden, and Juanita traffic counts were not part
of the original study.
The Council asked whether the speed bumps on 49th Avenue and Maple could remain after the Art
Fair. Mr. Millner said the speed bumps were typically temporary as they caused concern with snow
plowing. He reviewed potential new impacts if development occurred on the west side with a
potential T intersection or left as signed at 20 mph.
VII.G. RESOLUTION 2017-56 ADOPTED - ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS –
ADOPTED
Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City
must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the
donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2017-56
accepting various grants and donations. Member Fischer seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE
Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence.
VIII.B. MINUTES
1. COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION, FEBRUARY 13 AND APRIL 3, 2017
2. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, APRIL 20, 2017
3. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS, MARCH 24, 2017
4. PLANNING COMMISSION, MAY 10, 2017
Informational; no action required.
IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received
X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received
XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received
XII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF JUNE 6, 2017 – Received
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting
adjourned at 11:02 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 6, 2017
Page 9
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 20, 2017.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the June 6, 2017, meeting available.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
C laims
F rom:Don Uram, F inanc e Direc tor
Item Activity:
Subject:R ec eive P ayment o f C laims As P er: P re-Lis t Dated
6/01/2017 TO TAL: $736,411.16 And P er P re-Lis t
Dated 6/08/2017 TO TAL: $879,888.93 And C red it
C ard Trans ac tions 3/28/2017-4/25/2017 TO TAL:
$46,243.10
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve C laims.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
C laims list is attached.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 6/01/2017 TOTAL: $736,411.16
Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 6/08/2017 TOTAL: $879,888.93
Credit Card Transactions 3/28/2017-4/25/2017 TOTAL: $46,243.10
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page- 1
Business Unit
4879 6/1/2017 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
106.40 432499 2119388 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
56.50 432470 2119393 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
162.90
4880 6/1/2017 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
5,148.50 STS REMODELING 432203 23271514.00-11 04427.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Comp Water Resource Mgmt Plan
5,148.50
4881 6/1/2017 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
470.65 432384 59019400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
3,463.90 432423 59019500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
3,258.25 432496 59019600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
571.75 432494 59019700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
777.30 432430 59019800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
91.80 432426 95857300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
28.12 432497 95857400 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
189.47 432569 95857500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
8,851.24
4882 6/1/2017 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF MN
1,569.40 AMB REFUND - MOHAMED AHMED 432501 052617 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,569.40
4883 6/1/2017 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
83.85 432251 129591 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
83.85
4884 6/1/2017 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR
1,218.00 432556 2-5/26/2017 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
1,218.00
4885 6/1/2017 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS
80.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 432511 0E-449837-1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
19.14 SUPPLIES 432512 OE-449837-2 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
57.24 GENERAL SUPPLIES 432242 WO-292239-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
157.07
4886 6/1/2017 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC.
336.95 432247 902581478 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS
336.95
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 2
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/1/2017 —
Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4886
4887
6/1/2017
6/1/2017
116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC.
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
Continued...
272.90 COMPUTER BRACKETS FOR SQUADS 431742 HRM1359 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
272.90- 431745 HVR7375 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
261.24 SQUAD REPLACEMENT MOUNTS 432239 HVVT8642 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT
720.08 COMPUTER MOUNTS FOR NEW SQUADS 432599 HXV9003 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
981.32
4888 6/1/2017 102519 CHIEF'S TOWING INC
100.00 TRAINING 432240 623215 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00
4889 6/1/2017 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO
154.00 432291 67-1993 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
154.00
4890 6/1/2017 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.
82.25 432233 491424 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
82.25
4891 6/1/2017 134730 EXPLORE EDINA
33,869.80 APRIL LODGING TAX 432475 052617 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES
33,869.80
4892 6/1/2017 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE
139.63 AFB PUBLICATION 432553 743281667 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
139.63
4893 6/1/2017 129508 IMPACT
3,231.96 432509 123965 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
481.82 432510 124117 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
3,713.78
4894 6/1/2017 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
64.66 432515 1069293 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
64.66
4895 6/1/2017 100858 LOGIS
1,086.00 WEB SERVERS/FIBER 432409 43490 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1,664.00 INTERNET 432409 43490 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page - 3
Business Unit
4895 6/1/2017 100858 LOGIS Continued...
2,752.00 HUBBLE/TUNGSTEN 432409 43490 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE
2,896.00 GIS 432409 43490 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
4,332.00 E-PERMITS 432409 43490 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS
4,803.00 FINANCE 432409 43490 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE
6,703.00 PAYROLL 432409 43490 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
7,022.00 ASSESSING 432409 43490 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING
6,719.00 UTILITY BILLING 432409 43490 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
3,100.00 HUBBLE LICENSES 432245 43543 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE
41,077.00
4896 6/1/2017 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
95.20 432468 238252 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
95.20
4897 6/1/2017 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI
8,546.28 AUDIT 432410 42310 1160.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE
159.55 AUDIT 432410 42310 5110.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
121.13 AUDIT 432410 42310 5210.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
214.09 AUDIT 432410 42310 5310.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT POOL ADMINISTRATION
625.31 AUDIT 432410 42310 5410.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
608.58 AUDIT 432410 42310 5510.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ARENAADMINISTRATION
168.18 AUDIT 432410 42310 5552.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION
378.27 AUDIT 432410 42310 5710.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
249.31 AUDIT 432410 42310 5760.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
464.59 AUDIT 432410 42310 5820.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT 50TH STREET GENERAL
1,064.99 AUDIT 432410 42310 5860.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,212.30 AUDIT 432410 42310 5840.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
3,228.14 AUDIT 432410 42310 5902.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
459.28 AUDIT 432410 42310 5932.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GENERAL STORM SEWER
17,500.00
4898 6/1/2017 101483 MENARDS
11.66 POWER GRAB 432263 042369 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
38.97 DRAW SLIDES 432278 42390 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
53.10 BLACK CARPET 432277 42405 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
32.08 CHAINSAW CHAIN 432282 42657 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
31.95 LAWN SUPPLY 432537 42768 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
45.88 432514 42779 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
47.88 GEN SUPPLY 432536 42785 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
17.25 EDGING, PARTICAL BOARD 432525 42800 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 4
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4898 6/1/2017 101483 MENARDS Continued...
8.28 LAWN SUPPLY 432538 42868 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
19.90 CAULK/BOLTS 432568 42891 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS
225.00 TOOLSHOP 432541 42950 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
531.95
4899 6/1/2017 100906 urn DISTRIBUTING INC.
152.89 IRRIGATION PARTS 432522 1118112-00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
180.60 IRRIGATION PARTS 432523 1118242-00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
333.49
4900 6/1/2017 115669 ON CALL SERVICES
6,395.70 TODDLER IMPROVEMENT COMPLETION 432266 2800 5700.1720 BUILDINGS EDINBOROUGH BALANCE SHEET
6,395.70
4901 6/1/2017 129485 PAPCO INC.
208.98 CLEANING SUPPLIES 432270 202354 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
208.98
4902 6/1/2017 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
259.90 9' BDAY PLATES 432260 12335 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
489.43 POWER SPONGES, FOAMY DISINFECT 432259 12336 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
640.59 VVYPALL RAGS, FOAM DISINFECTANT 432264 12369 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
77.23 NAPKIN HOLDER, SCOUR PADS 432535 12371 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
171.57 STRAWS, NAPKINS 432265 12372 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS
748.09 BATHROOM SUPPLIES 432518 12375 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
39.37 BATHROOM SUPPLIES 432518 12375 5553.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
358.86 VAC BAGS, FOAMY CLEANER 432534 12423 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
2,785.04
4903 6/1/2017 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC.
884.30 U JOINT REPAIR ON YODAZAM 432517 0062367-IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
884.30
4904 6/1/2017 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
1,523.50 432286 71245 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
709.50 432571 71315 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
2,233.00
4905 6/1/2017 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING
2,880.00 432527 1813 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 5
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/1/2017 -
Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4905 6/1/2017 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING Continued...
2,880.00
4906 6/1/2017 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC,
353.83 432560 S3432151.001 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
353.83
4907 6/1/2017 118190 TURFWERKS LLC
84.55 SWITCH 432574 E101666 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
84.55
4908 6/1/2017 119454 VINOCOPIA
129.00 432427 181042 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
181.75 432428 181043 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
423.50 432495 181054 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
734.25
4909 6/1/2017 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION
62.45 432547 48388050 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
46.06 432548 48463557 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
10.25 432398 48679288 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
118.76
4910 6/1/2017 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
596.40 432313 34876 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,132.77 432302 37663 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
332.20 432346 37675 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,517.10 432314 37676 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
3,578.47
414660 6/1/2017 129458 ACME TOOLS
10.00 HANDLE 432250 4967104 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION
358.50 432561 4974153 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
368.50
414661 6/1/2017 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION
480.75 CO2 432262 33805420 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER
480.75
414662 6/1/2017 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS
130.00 FEB ALERUS INVOICE 432573 0C49326 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 6
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/1/2017 -
Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414662 6/1/2017 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS Continued...
125.00 APRIL COBRA INVOICE 432450 C51786 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
255.00
414663 6/1/2017 133614 AMBURG INC.
2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 432237 144062 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS
2,500.00
414664 6/1/2017 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC.
197.73 432244 1003801098 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL
177.48 LAUNDRY 432221 1003804378 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
137.09 LAUNDRY 432229 1003805770 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
128.87 432368 1003808969 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY
641.17
414665 6/1/2017 140496 ANDERSON, JOEL
7,282.60 REFUND - SENT US WRONG PAYMENT 432500 163691000 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
7,282.60
414666 6/1/2017 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
766.20 432385 3180589 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
2,330.95 432367 3180590 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,230.45 432447 3180591 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
5,327.60
414667 6/1/2017 140539 BEDORE, BRUCE
88.80 REFUND 432456 118358-34199600 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
4
88.80
414668 6/1/2017 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.
234.00 432399 4692239 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
546.00 PIZZA 432507 4692241 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
780.00
414669 6/1/2017 125139 BERNICK'S
1,863.20 432353 360635 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
487.20 432445 360642 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
20.00 432299 360735 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
1,421.70 432300 360736 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
3,792.10
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 7
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/1/2017 -
Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414669
414670
6/1/2017
6/1/2017
125139 BERNICK'S
126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
Continued...
438.70 432268 463420 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
438.70
414671 6/1/2017 122599 BIOLAWN
115.00 LIBRARY GRASS 432243 114572 1653.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE
115.00
414672 6/1/2017 119153 BLACKBURN MFG. CO.
170.22 LOCATE FLAGS 432565 0542179-IN 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
170.22
414673 6/1/2017 135784 BLAKE, PATRICIA
86.89 REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES 432354 05262017 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
86.89
414674 6/1/2017 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
1,400.00 432438 141974 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
351.00 432383 142008 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,751.00
414675 6/1/2017 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
4,170.85 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE FEE 432236 201700522 1628.6103.02 GOLF PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
4,170.85
414676 6/1/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
2,800.02 432309 1080639106 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
898.35 432310 1080639107 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
213.61 432311 1080639108 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
281.27 432307 1080639109 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
136.67 432305 1080639110 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
145.06 432469 1080639111 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
504.72 432357 1080639112 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
133.70 432460 1080639113 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
641.07 432461 1080639114 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
161.15- 432345 2080169664 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
699.50- 432362 2080172660 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
4,893.82
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 8
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/1/2017 -
Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414677 6/1/2017 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC Continued...
4,352.70 432344 1090713012 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
48.60 432343 1090713013 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
7,791.90 432448 1090715013 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
123.00 432449 1090715014 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
532.00 432489 1090715015 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
25.50 432488 1090715016 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
2,364.10 432466 1090715017 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
25.50 432467 1090715018 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
15,263.30
414678 6/1/2017 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
259.20 MERCHANDISE 432217 927826275 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
259.20
414679 6/1/2017 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
905.45 432290 1879325 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
5,359.15 432348 1879326 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
5,969.25 432444 1882223 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
132.00 432349 1892356 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
20.45 432293 254-179 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
12,386.30
414680 6/1/2017 100678 CARLSON PRINTING CO.
392.00 CLUBHOUSE FLYERS 432269 00107419 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
392.00
414681 6/1/2017 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO.
332.73 432542 326068 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
332.73
414682 6/1/2017 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
50.18 10089900-4 432479 10089900-5/19/1 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
7
2,960.45 10437426-9 432474 10437426-5/17 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
35.35 432493 10633418-5/17 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY
863.13 5546504-1 432476 5546504-5 /17 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2,725.33 5563827-4 432471 5563827-5/17 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
592.16 432490 5584304-5/17 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY
26.27 432492 5584310-5/17 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER
19.74 432491 5590919-5/17 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page- 9
Business Unit
414682 6/1/2017 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued...
2,194.37 5591458-4 432477 5591458-5/17 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL
66.89 5596524-8 432478 5596524-5/17 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
734.68 8034001-1 432472 8034001-5/17 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING
33.29 432429 9546705-5/17 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS
1,073.53 9724639-1 432473 9724639-5/17 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
11,375.37
414683 6/1/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK
103.91 RICHFIELD 911 TRUNKS E77-0056 432219 0056-5/17 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911
109.90 EDINA 911 TRUNKS 612 E23-0652 432218 0652-5/17 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911
213.81
414684 6/1/2017 127147 CHAMPION PLUMBING
32.50 REFUND DUPLICATE PERMIT 432179 155574 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS
32.50
414685 6/1/2017 140529 CHEN, WILLIAM
148.90 REFUND 432185 116606-02020060 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
06
148.90
414686 6/1/2017 140534 CHRIST, JENNIFER
200.00 REFUND FOR SUMMER PROGRAMS 432194 052517 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
200.00
414687 6/1/2017 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL
130.54 432555 IN00021070 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
130.54
414688 6/1/2017 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION
389.03 432413 3619202191 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
389.03
414689 6/1/2017 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL
911.13 ACCT # M424-002073 432400 JUNE2017 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY
911.13
414690 6/1/2017 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO.
2,152.80 432551 13722 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE
2,152.80
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 10
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 — 6/1/2017
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414690 6/1/2017 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. Continued...
414691 6/1/2017 140543 DEAN HEALTH PLAN INC.
25.00 AMB REFUND - REGINAANDERSON 432502 052617 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
25.00
414692 6/1/2017 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
2,892.75 STD JUNE INVOICE 432572 F018342-5/26/17 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING
2,892.75
414693 6/1/2017 135800 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
1,500.00 ICWC -2 DAYS 432529 00000412568 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION
1,500.00
414694 6/1/2017 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC.
24.50 YELLOW PAGES 432276 650487671-5/17 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENAADMINISTRATION
24.50
414695 6/1/2017 140540 DEXHEIMER, KARL
22.75 REFUND 432457 102893-20025600 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
7
22.75
414696 6/1/2017 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL
600.00 EHS PE CLASS 432196 052317 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
600.00
414697 6/1/2017 136031 DUCHON, SUSAN S.
325.00 AD SALES COMMISSION THE TIMES 432232 2017-5/19 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
325.00
414698 6/1/2017 104645 EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL
38.00 OUTSIDE PLANTS 432261 HANGING BASKETS 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
38.00
414699 6/1/2017 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC.
93.05 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 432241 1908130 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
93.05
414700 6/1/2017 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC.
747.90 432412 7236 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 11
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/1/2017 -
Doc No Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414700 6/1/2017 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC.
140516 FINNANGER, PHIL
Continued...
414701 6/1/2017
747.90
400.00 EHS PE CLASSES 432198 052317 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
400.00
414702 6/1/2017 119211 FIRSTLAB
407.60 2ND Q RANDOM DOT 432451 FL00172749 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
407.60
414703 6/1/2017 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC.
741.16 LP FUEL 432594 01P5773330 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
741.16
414704 6/1/2017 100764 G & K SERVICES
15.00 SHOP RAGS 432204 6006493371 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
15.00
414705 6/1/2017 105508 GEMPLER'S INC.
121.90 432516 SI03437963 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE
121.90
414706 6/1/2017 140527 GERE LIVING TRUST
180.37 REFUND 432180 115619-16080004 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
0
180.37
414707 6/1/2017 103185 GERTENS
16.95 MULCH 432519 A47044/6 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
16.95
414708 6/1/2017 134210 GOPHER BEARING
115.07 BELTS 432230 5795620 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
115.07
414709 6/1/2017 101103 GRAINGER
68.24 FIRE EXTINGUISHER 432575 9450074845 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
124.04 CAR WASH BRUSH, HANDLE 432581 9452053904 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
16.73 SAFETY GLASSES 432582 9452266936 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
54.02 WHEEL 432586 9454055766 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 12
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/1/2017 -
Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414709 6/1/2017 101103 GRAINGER Continued...
169.80 432562 9454469488 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
86.50 PENS 432589 9455417627 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
108.04 WHEELS 432590 9456067793 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4.46 SHEATH 432593 9456518472 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
631.83
414710 6/1/2017 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
456.50 432312 PAV1341410 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
921.50 432356 PAV1341411 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,378.00
414711 6/1/2017 140541 GROUNDUP DEVELOPMENT
5.19 REFUND 432458 122746-12024800 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
8
5.19
414712 6/1/2017 140010 GROUP HEALTH INC.-WORKSITE
711.00 MAY EAP INVOICE 432453 W813817 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
711.00
414713 6/1/2017 140530 GUDMUNDSON, BRIAN
56.03 REFUND 432186 111071-30445300 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
8
56.03
414714 6/1/2017 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS
22,618.22 JUNE HP INVOICE-COBRA 432559 72924642 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
263,113.52 JUNE HP INVOICE-ACTIVES 432558 72930610 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
285,731.74
414715 6/1/2017 123072 HEALTH PARTNERS
437.05 AMB REFUND - JAMIER ELLIS 432504 052617 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
437.05
414716 6/1/2017 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
100.00 CPO CLASS 432193 052517 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
100.00
414717 6/1/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
1,200.78 432220 1000093429 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page - 13
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414717 6/1/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Continued...
1,200.78
414718 6/1/2017 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC.
618.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 432226 41173851 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
64.74 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 432228 41395355 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
879.71 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 432227 41653712 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,562.45
414719 6/1/2017 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
2,344.50 432440 895821 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
599.00 432292 895865 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
1,668.00 432351 896254 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
4,611.50
414720 6/1/2017 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES
5.10 HOLE COVERS 432272 5/17STMT 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
20.94 SANDING BELT 432272 5/17STMT 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS
153.18 PUTTY, POST HOLE DIGGER 432272 5/17STMT 1344.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
357.01 MASON MIX 432272 5/17STMT 1344.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
536.23
414721 6/1/2017 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
4,201.80 CAL HYPO & HCL ACID 432530 170516138 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION
4,201.80
414722 6/1/2017 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES
426.40 US CONFERENCE OF MAYORS 432455 20170526 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
426.40
414723 6/1/2017 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC
41.14 FILTERS 432597 038004863 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
41.14
414724 6/1/2017 101146 IMPACT TELECOM
376.72 5203192164-0000 432508 608570467 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
376.72
414725 6/1/2017 129619 INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
257.90 AIR COMPRESSOR REPAIR 432595 30603129 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
257.90
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 14
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/1/2017 -
Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414725
414726
6/1/2017
6/1/2017
129619 INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
108635 IPMA-HR MINNESOTA
Continued...
50.00 IPMA MN DUES SARAH /KELLY 432191 20170523 1170.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES
50.00
414727 6/1/2017 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
170.00 GREEN UP LAWN BROCHURES 432202 74932 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
170.00
414728 6/1/2017 140538 JESKE, JEROME
245.68 GOLF LEAGUE REFUND 432505 05262017 1628.4392.02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE SENIOR CITIZENS
245.68
414729 6/1/2017 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
29.40- 432350 2658407 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
1,723.70 432303 2672953 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
4,788.70 432441 2672954 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
169.59 432443 2672955 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
179.20 432446 2672956 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
7,323.03 432366 2672959 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
113.80 432364 2672960 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
126.75 432365 2672964 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
14,395.37
414730 6/1/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
.20 432323 5694056 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
.29 432322 5712385 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
407.50 432418 5733041 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
93.16 432394 5733042 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
72.59 432436 5733043 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,314.45 432393 5733044 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
398.57 432391 5733045 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,107.44 432387 5733046 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
188.06 432422 5733047 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
286.64 432386 5733048 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
165.14 432417 5733050 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
1,941.66 432437 5733051 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
416.02 432416 5733052 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,645.10 432415 5733053 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,298.00 432432 5733054 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page - 15
Business Unit
414730 6/1/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued...
50.32 432414 5733055 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
207.41 432421 5733056 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,141.81 432433 5733057 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
511.38 432424 5733058 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
3,615.37 432376 5733061 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
3,595.89 432377 5733062 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
4,299.32 432373 5733063 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
2,169.59 432372 5733064 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
21.99 432371 5733065 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
25.16 432370 5733066 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
116.80 432374 5733067 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
566.62 432369 5733068 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
378.48 432378 5733069 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
53.76- 432342 607883 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
281.46- 432339 607884 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
98.16- 432335 608994 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
.19- 432337 615444 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
33.42- 432340 616067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
32.83- 432336 616068 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
.10- 432320 616891 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
209.16- 432330 617073 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
337.25- 432338 618062 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
50.00- 432341 618063 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
22.98- 432485 623919 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1.16- 432482 624344 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
10.00- 432484 624603 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
6.90- 432483 624607 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
5.67- 432363 624605 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
14.81- 432481 624606 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
.19- 432480 624894 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
34.44- 432333 625315 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
41.86- 432334 625317 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
26,800.62
414731 6/1/2017 140542 JOHNSON, MARK
7.19 REFUND 432459 113787-34194400 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
7
7.19
414732 6/1/2017 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 16
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 — 6/1/2017
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414732 6/1/2017 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY Continued..
137.95 RTU/EXH BELTS 432566 1096828 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
137.95
414733 6/1/2017 140514 KINNE, BEN
2,500.00 TUITION REIMBURSE KINNE 2017 432563 20170523 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
2,500.00
414734 6/1/2017 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
730.37 DRILL BITS, NUTS, BOLTS 432576 9304955274 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
37.39 NUTS 432583 9304958266 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
787.08 LIGHTS, ADAPTERS, COUPLERS 432596 9304974314 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,554.84
414735 6/1/2017 138143 LSQ FUNDING GROUP LC
79.64 MERCHANDISE 432208 INV713297944 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
79.64
414736 6/1/2017 140536 MACS
160.00 TRUCK HVAC TRAINING 432308 225 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
160.00
414737 6/1/2017 140531 MASON, REID ARTHUR
20.07 REFUND 432187 121397 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
20.07
414738 6/1/2017 118096 M-B COMPANIES INC
3,912.33 SERVICE CONTRACT 432289 217703 1335.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAVEMENT MARKINGS
243.54 VACUUM PIPE 432281 217777 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS
4,155.87
414739 6/1/2017 100885 METRO SALES INC
2,459.85 LASER PRINTER QUARTERLY 432252 INV798507 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
2,459.85
414740 6/1/2017 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD
280.00 432279 4813 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
280.00
414741 6/1/2017 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES
1,826.00 432550 ARC-000894 1640.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 — 6/1/2017
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page - 17
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414741 6/1/2017 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES Continued...
400.00 FOAMING HAND SOAP 432253 SOI-058490 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
2,226.00
414742 6/1/2017 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER
2,040.00 WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT 432284 35452 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
2,040.00
414743 6/1/2017 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA
269.26 432513 99672 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
269.26
414744 6/1/2017 132597 MIXMI BRANDS LLC
96.00 FROZEN YOGURT 432255 3030 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
96.00
414745 6/1/2017 122249 MN APA
25.00 ASSISTANT CITY PLANNER POSTING 432195 05252017 1170.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL HUMAN RESOURCES
25.00
414746 6/1/2017 139288 MN DESIGN BUILD
83.76 REFUND 432188 123140-16321200 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
0
83.76
414747 6/1/2017 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS
83.96 LUBRICANT 432577 923223 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
28.99 DEGREASER 432578 925336 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
112.95
414748 6/1/2017 140532 NATHAN RAICH PROPERTIES LLC
90.00 REFUND 432189 121789-12042900 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
9
90.00
414749 6/1/2017 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING
112.00 ADVERTISING 432273 N10014150 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
112.00
414750 6/1/2017 103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER
22,455.42 432546 F37653 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 18
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414750 6/1/2017 103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER Continued...
630.60 BED LINER 432285 F37690S 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
23,086.02
414751 6/1/2017 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
744.50 432301 120821 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
105.50 432347 120822 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
850.00
414752 6/1/2017 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
7,278.00 SIGN SHEETING MATERIAL 432288 TI-0309614 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
1,155.02 SIGN SHEETING MATERIAL 432528 TI-0309716 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
8,433.02
414753 6/1/2017 104350 NIKE USA INC.
401.71 MERCHANDISE 432215 9904095677 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
115.31 MERCHANDISE 432246 9904205783 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
517.02
414754 6/1/2017 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC
626.40 LIGHTS 432579 43829 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
510.40 LIGHTS 432587 43855 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,136.80
414755 6/1/2017 134814 NUVEEN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC
6,650.05 ASSET MGMT FEE 432411 172587 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES
6,650.05
414756 6/1/2017 103578 OFFICE DEPOT
126.42 432274 927116542001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION
54.58 PRINTING SUPPLIES 432275 927117085001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION
181.00
414757 6/1/2017 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES
27.50 432401 W17040660 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
27.50 432401 W17040660 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
55.00 432401 W17040660 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
82.50 432401 W17040660 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION
82.55 432401 W17040660 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
192.50 432401 W17040660 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
302.50 432401 W17040660 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page- 19
Business Unit
414757 6/1/2017 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES Continued...
55.00 432401 W17040660 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
27.50 432401 W17040660 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION
110.00 432401 W17040660 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION
123.75 432401 W17040660 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
123.75 432401 W17040660 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
55.00 432401 W17040660 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
82.50 432401 W17040660 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY
82.50 432401 W17040660 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY
55.00 432401 W17040660 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION
290.48 432402 W17040665 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE
1,775.53
414758 6/1/2017 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
79.20 432540 601303 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
79.20
414759 6/1/2017 133190 OSLO BUILDERS LLC
46.91 REFUND 432190 120476-34205000 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
5
46.91
414760 6/1/2017 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING
52.38 CATERED FOOD 432254 11232 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
67.88 CATERED FOOD 432531 11267-1 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
49.88 CATERED FOOD 432532 11267-2 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
25.00 CATERED FOOD 432533 11268 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
195.14
414761 6/1/2017 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
15.83- 432317 8578956 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
189.90 432296 8591076 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
2,243.06 432355 8591077-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
639.20 432327 9691015 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
3,056.33
414762 6/1/2017 140533 PAVEK, BRIAN
11.97 REFUND 432506 114606-30408900 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
0
11.97
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 20
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/1/2017 -
Doc No Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414763 6/1/2017 119008 PCI ROADS LLC Continued...
1,926.00 REIMBURSE FOR HYDRANT METER 432192 0051917 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES
1,926.00
414764 6/1/2017 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
801.09 432396 92583961 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
801.09
414765 6/1/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
45.16 432431 2172129 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
10.44 432381 2172130 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
.58 432389 2172131 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
141.40 432390 2172132 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
2,533.56 432388 2172133 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
366.96 432395 2172134 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
172.98 432420 2172136 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
247.43 432439 2172137 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,084.86 432434 2172138 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
116.25 432419 2172139 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
2,451.25 432379 2172142 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
1,802.26 432375 2172143 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1.08- 432361 250793 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
6.00- 432321 256780 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
73.66- 432329 257367 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
22.36- 432315 258093 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
7.43- 432331 259846 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
9,862.60
414766 6/1/2017 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC.
700.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 432222 417104670 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
700.00
414767 6/1/2017 137649 PLH & ASSOCIATES LLC
2,500.00 REFUND NEW HOME ESCROW 432238 142732 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS
2,500.00
414768 6/1/2017 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL
46.68 PEST CONTROL 432231 5672922 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY
46.68
414769 6/1/2017 140493 POSNER, KATHLEEN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 — 6/1/2017
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page- 21
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414769 6/1/2017 140493 POSNER, KATHLEEN Continued...
106.86 REFUND 432182 104557-30576200 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
1-5/17
106.86
414770 6/1/2017 119429 POVOLNY SPECIALTIES
1,885.00 PARKLAWN AVE SVC CABINET 432598 41420 01267.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MSA Maintenance Projects
1,885.00
414771 6/1/2017 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC
900.00 432567 IN200-1012735 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
900.00
414772 6/1/2017 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC.
33.05 A9 COURSE SUPPLY 432209 82232 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
33.05
414773 6/1/2017 140489 REGER, ALFRED
70.97 REFUND 432181 116635-15798400 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
8-5/17
70.97
414774 6/1/2017 138103 REYNOLDS, GEORGE
400.00 EHS PE CLASSES 432199 052317 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
400.00
414775 6/1/2017 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
437.97 TOOL BOX 432584 1927872301 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
43.97 JACK KIT 432585 1927872915 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
481.94
414776 6/1/2017 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY
51.54 432298 17-13860 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
121.50 432316 17-13861 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
173.04
414777 6/1/2017 132202 SAFETY FIRST PLAYGROUND SURFACING LLC
780.00 MULCH FOR DRY PLAY 432258 5983 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION
780.00
414778 6/1/2017 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 22
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/1/2017 -
Doc No Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414778 6/1/2017 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT Continued...
234.77 432557 008889 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION
234.77
414779 6/1/2017 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT
912.50 MAY SELECTACCOUNT INVOICE 432452 008816-5/17 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
912.50
414780 6/1/2017 140468 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.
54.67 CLUBHOUSE PAINT 432205 3937-0 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE
54.67
414781 6/1/2017 120784 SIGN PRO
114.72 SIGNS 432206 11729 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION
140.80 MERCHANDISE 432207 11764 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
68.00 432280 11776 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING
68.00 432280 11776 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING
68.00 432280 11776 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING
459.52
414782 6/1/2017 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS
296.00 LOGO CLOTHING 432539 842664 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS
296.00
414783 6/1/2017 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC.
40.93 432267 310865 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
40.93
414784 6/1/2017 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC
126.40 WEED KILLER 432524 80658250 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
18.67 432543 80718704 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE
145.07
414785 6/1/2017 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL
25.29 WIRE CUTTER 432591 ARV/32676431 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
25.29
414786 6/1/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
180.00- 432332 0031860 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
139.50- 432486 0032164 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
360.00- 432360 0032165 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page - 23
Business Unit
414786 6/1/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued...
.40 432319 1540942 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
.40 432318 1540943 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
609.85 432306 1546495 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
474.24 432295 1546496 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
62.66 432304 1546497 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
317.60 432294 1546498 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
.40 432464 1546499 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
3,425.17 432463 1546500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
62.66 432462 1546501 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
4,412.92 432465 1546502 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
317.60 432358 1546503 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
5,225.10 432359 1546504 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
781.15 432325 1546505 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
9,840.57 432326 1546506 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
333.60 432328 1546507 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
3,870.42 432324 1546508 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
29,055.24
414787 6/1/2017 120155 SOUTHVIEW DESIGN
257.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 432249 10460 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
257.00
414788 6/1/2017 129891 SPACK CONSULTING
8,380.00 TRAFFIC STUDY-BUS GARAGE 432549 5566 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES
8,380.00
414789 6/1/2017 129481 SPAIN VANISH, JILL
120.00 REFUND 432183 84299-290168005 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
120.00
414790 6/1/2017 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO
238.11 MERCHANDISE 432216 0000800446 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
238.12 MERCHANDISE 432216 0000800446 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES
476.23
414791 6/1/2017 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
163.75 432442 15980 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
431.75 432352 15981 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
314.00 432297 15985 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
909.50
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 24
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/1/2017 —
Doc No Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414791 6/1/2017
414792 6/1/2017
133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
136030 STEWART, ROBERT J.
Continued...
35.00 ROTARY CLUB REIMBURSEMENT 432454 20170526 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
35.00
414793 6/1/2017 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
33.00 TIRE DISPOSAL 432580 10146603 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
33.00
414794 6/1/2017 135803 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL
6,729.15 MAY LIFE INS -ACTIVES 432234 237716-001-5/17 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING
68.50 MAY LIFE INS - COBRA 432235 237716-901-5/17 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
6,797.65
414795 6/1/2017 140528 SWENSON, STEFFON
12.50 REFUND 432184 122101-33172300 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
5
12.50
414796 6/1/2017 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA
530.17 CONCESSION PRODUCT 432257 147252708 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
530.17
414797 6/1/2017 104932 TAYLOR MADE
409.37 MERCHANDISE 432211 32520096 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
490.22 MERCHANDISE 432212 32520136 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
294.91 MERCHANDISE 432213 32520423 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
294.91 MERCHANDISE 432214 32520470 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
299.81 MERCHANDISE 432210 32520883 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,789.22
414798 6/1/2017 113549 TENNIS WEST
1,379.00 432552 17-0077117 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE
1,379.00
414799 6/1/2017 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
190.64 ROCKER SWITCH 432592 23419-00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
190.64
414800 6/1/2017 121253 THAYER, LARRY
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page - 25
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414800 6/1/2017 121253 THAYER, LARRY Continued...
115.03 ASST WEED INSP MILEAGE 432197 052317 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE
115.03
414801 6/1/2017 101037 TOIVONEN PAINTING
5,450.00 BATH HOUSE PAINT, SHIP 432256 051217 5311.6532 PAINT POOL OPERATION
5,450.00
414802 6/1/2017 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
180.00 432271 40020 1642.6547 SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE
180.00
414803 6/1/2017 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN
167.97 432544 1501-006337 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE
231.98 432545 1501-006368 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE
399.95
414804 6/1/2017 114236 USA BLUE BOOK
1,062.86 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 432283 263613 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
1,543.42 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 432526 264722 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
645.90 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 432248 266000 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
3,252.18
414805 6/1/2017 120318 VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
50.40 432521 EW1339441-5/17 2710.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CAS ADMINISTRATION
50.40
414806 6/1/2017 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
35.01 FINANCE MIFI 432554 9784891034 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE
35.01 SFAUS IPAD 432554 9784891034 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
35.01 CLARSON IPAD 432554 9784891034 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING
70.02 PARK MAINT VZ DATA DEVICES 432554 9784891034 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
70.02 PW- ELECTRICAL VZ DATA 432554 9784891034 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
105.03 CTS IPAD DATA 432554 9784891034 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS
245.07 ENGINEERING VZ DATA 432554 9784891034 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL
280.08 IT VZ DATA DEVICES 432554 9784891034 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
385.11 INSPECTIONS VZ DATA DEVICES 432554 9784891034 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS
805.23 FIRE VZ DATA DEVICES 432554 9784891034 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,085.31 POLICE VZ DATA DEVICES 432554 9784891034 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
35.01 TSHIRLEY IPAD 432554 9784891034 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
735.21 PUBLIC WORKS VZ DATA DEVICES 432554 9784891034 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING)
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2017 14:55:02
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 26
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/1/2017 -
Inv No
6/1/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414806 6/1/2017 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.
Continued...
414807 6/1/2017
3,921.12
765.80 FUSE HOLDERS 432564 S000410112.005 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS
765.80
414808 6/1/2017 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS
185.32 432397 98840 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
185.32
414809 6/1/2017 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC.
296.75 432287 7629 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
296.75
414810 6/1/2017 123364 WHITE, SHAUN
1,449.98 FDIC FIRE CONFERENCE 432520 052517 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,449.98
414811 6/1/2017 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
178.32 432382 7134196 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
2,348.74 432392 7134197 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,559.59 432435 7134199 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
62.73 432425 7134200 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
3,241.76 432380 7134201 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VVINE VERNON SELLING
794.00 432487 7134289 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,254.96 432498 7134498 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
9,440.10
414812 6/1/2017 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
114.21 SERVICE WIRE FOR SIGNAL DAMAGE 432570 14601300 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS
114.21
414813 6/1/2017 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC.
171.77 SCBA CYLINDER BRACKET 432225 E1597245 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
171.77
414814 6/1/2017 101726 XCEL ENERGY
7,865.42 51-0837548-4 432403 546397416 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT
33.89 51-4151897-6 432405 546444972 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
54.62 51-5276505-8 432408 546466807 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/1/2017 — 6/1/2017
5/30/2017 14:55:02
Page - 27
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414814 6/1/2017 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued...
39.20 51-7567037-0 432404 546500752 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
107.73 51-0010025256-3 432406 546531027 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
15.28 51-0010613106-9 432407 546546123 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
8,116.14
414815 6/1/2017 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
923.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 432224 2522250 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
396.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 432223 2522839 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,319.00
736,411.16 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Checks
A/P ACH Payment
Total Payments
599,983.29
136,427.87
736,411.16
R55CKS2 LOGIS100
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2017 14:55:09
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary
Page- 1
6/1/2017 - 6/1/2017
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 150,676.47
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 213.81
02700 CONSERVATION & SUSTAINABILITY 50.40
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 10,265.00
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 981.32
05100 ART CENTER FUND 595.81
05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,846.46
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 13,237.37
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 5,905.34
05500 ICE ARENA FUND 5,338.80
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 3,168.00
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 10,129.04
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,150.51
05800 LIQUOR FUND 162,865.29
05900 UTILITY FUND 66,055.06
05930 STORM SEWER FUND 5,777.78
06000 RISK MGMT ISF 285,800.24
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,732.56
09900 PAYROLL FUND 9,621.90
Report Totals 736,411.16
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing polic'es and
5 ures •
AKE fAi
City '7"-IT ger
roce
ce Direct
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page- 1
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4911 6/8/2017 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
91.60 432709 2110606 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
88.80 432708 2119383 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
180.40 432827 2121509 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
159.60 433042 2124466 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
520.40
4912 6/8/2017 100575 ALL SAFE INC.
128.37 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 433011 154296 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
124.55 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 433012 154305 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
252.92
4913 6/8/2017 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
748.82 432922 1276029 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
362.74 COFFEE FIRE DEPT. 432921 1276552 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
1,111.56
4914 6/8/2017 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
10,404.50 STORM WATER MGMT 432666 23270354.00-231 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
10,404.50
4915 6/8/2017 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
145.55 432823 59066100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
153.55 432800 59066200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
2,686.79 432799 59105800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
145.55 433041 59112300 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
406.20 433072 59112500 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
97.50 432834 59112600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
3,542.48 432834 59112600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
10.77- 432713 95829500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
102.46 432822 95892400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
89.40 433068 95895700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
7,358.71
4916 6/8/2017 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC.
2,130.00 SOUTH DOOR REPAIR 433044 32914(R) 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
2,130.00
4917 6/8/2017 132444 BOLTON & MENK INC.
11,445.00 432643 0203383 03500.1705.21 17077 CONSULTING INSPECTION Presidents Area Rehab Phase 2
11,445.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 2
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4917
4918
6/8/2017
6/8/2017
132444 BOLTON & MENK INC.
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
Continued...
74.51 COVER 432951 1146486 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
96.95 COVER 432851 1150381X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
75.51 COVER 433099 1151506 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
246.97
4919 6/8/2017 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
547.25 MATERIALS TESTING 432645 8093354 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS
547.25
4920 6/8/2017 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR
1,537.00 432861 3-5/31/2017 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
1,537.00
4921 6/8/2017 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS
12.76 CORRECTION PENS 432644 OE-449946-1 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
24.50 STAMP 432661 WO-288369-2 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
5.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 432920 WO-293080-1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
71.00 SUPPLIES 433086 WO-294616-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
133.06 FOLDERS, RUBBER BANDS, OFFICE 433129 WO-294801-1 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION
246.61
4922 6/8/2017 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC.
172.53 433075 988868725 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS
172.53
4923 6/8/2017 100677 CARGILL INC.
5,732.49 CLEARLANE SALT (80 TONS) 432929 2903451976 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
5,732.49
4924 6/8/2017 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
556.50 SQUAD CAR DOCK MOUNTS 432641 HXZ5232 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT
690.84 2 DISPLAYS FOR RYAN 433084 JBG8915 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1,247.34
4925 6/8/2017 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD
460.29 433131 6736 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT
460.29
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page- 3
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4926 6/8/2017 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES I NC. Continued-.
1,554.00 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 432943 7070238566 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
897.75 JANITORAL SERVICES 432926 7070238669 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
2,450.00 CITY HALL CLEANING 432944 7070238856 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL
4,901.75
4927 6/8/2017 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.
76.38 AD FOR BID PUBLICATION 433132 496735 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
82.25 AD FOR BID PUBLICATION 433134 496736 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
94.00 AD FOR BID PUBLICATION 433133 496737 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
70.50 PUBLIC PC PUB. HR NOTICE 432674 691677 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
323.13
4928 6/8/2017 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC.
425.00 ROWAY 433040 2473526 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT
425.00
4929 6/8/2017 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC
1,284.00 SOUTH MAIN PUMP REPAIR 432668 54921 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
8,191.00 SOUTH PUM REPLACEMENT 432667 54939 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
9,475.00
4930 6/8/2017 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC.
400.00 DOG LICENSE FORM UPDATES 432987 JJ5899 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
3,430.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE - MAY 432987 JJ5899 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
3,830.00
4931 6/8/2017 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC.
60.56 TOILET RENTAL 432656 115941 5424.6189 SEWER & WATER RANGE
59.50 432854 116243 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL
44.63 432855 116244 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL
151.50 432856 116331 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL
316.19
4932 6/8/2017 100858 LOGIS
1,150.00 IT CONSULTING 432682 43558 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
1,150.00
4933 6/6/2017 127057 MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE LLC
3,099.80 CLEANING SERVICE 433126 242246 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
3,099.80
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 4
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4933 6/8/2017
4934 6/8/2017
127057 MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE LLC
101483 MENARDS
Continued...
13.96 433062 42858 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
3.84 MAINTENANCE GARAGE FILTER 432653 42859 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE
32.70 DOOR HANDLES, CONTACT CEMENT 432914 43059 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
20.37 WORKSHOP SUPPLY 432906 43359 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
30.94 SUPPLIES 432938 43360 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
39.96 PAINT ROLLERS 432919 43418 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS
141.77
4935 6/8/2017 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
78.37 TRACTION CABLE CLUTCH 432647 1119078-00 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
78.37
4936 6/8/2017 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS
793.09 BDAY TABLE COVERS 433156 453189 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
793.09
4937 6/8/2017 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY
798.80 STEEL 433135 378834 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
798.80
4938 6/8/2017 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC.
52.00 TIRES SCRAP FEE 432954 210288899 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
52.00
4939 6/8/2017 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
827.16 REPLACE BROKEN TOILET 432646 71314 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
827.16
4940 6/8/2017 104672 SPRINT
16.76 432779 873184124-5/17 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING
16.76 432779 873184124-5/17 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
37.51 432779 873184124-5/17 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
44.32 432779 873184124-5/17 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
50.28 432779 873184124-5/17 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
100.56 432779 873184124-5/17 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE
128.12 432779 873184124-5/17 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
16.76 432779 873184124-5/17 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
63.85 432779 873184124-5/17 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING)
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check-Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page- 5
Business Unit
4940 6/8/2017 104672 SPRINT Continued._
17.76 432779 873184124-5/17 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY
492.68
4941 6/8/2017 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC.
807.02 432696 S3431635.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
221.48 432931 S3431635.002 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
597.70 METER PLUMBING SUPPLIES 432688 S3432925.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
25.60 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 433121 S3435551.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
50.10 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 433120 S3436446.001 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES
688.05 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 433117 S3438329.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
19.66 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 433119 S3438719.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
95.65 432933 S3438844.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
273.82 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 433113 S3439616.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
2,779.08
4942 6/8/2017 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC
123.60 J HOOKS 433116 30036 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
123.60
4943 6/8/2017 101015 STREICHERS
119.98 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 432676 11264372 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
119.98
4944 6/8/2017 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
130.09 HEADLAMP 432946 25275 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
130.09
4945 6/8/2017 118190 TURFWERKS LLC
14.56 SWITCH 433136 E101955 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
139.29 WHEEL 433176 E101962 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
15.36 SWITCH 433137 E101964 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
169.21
4946 6/8/2017 119454 VINOCOPIA
132.25 432762 181041 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
132.00 433065 181476 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
132.75 432833 181480 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
132.00 432798 181482 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
529.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 6
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/8/2017 -
Doc No Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
4947 6/8/2017 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued...
536.25 432731 38279 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
644.40 432826 38294 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
995.05 432742 38295 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
2,175.70
414816 6/8/2017 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY
290.00 432750 E-2951 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
290.00
414817 6/8/2017 129458 ACME TOOLS
328.64 432997 4984676 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
462.69 432996 4988831 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
79.98 432995 4988873 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
267.29 433152 4991579 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,138.60
414818 6/8/2017 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY
33.00 MERCHANDISE 432962 904248553 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
33.00
414819 6/8/2017 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC.
89.05 432913 1003808978 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY
113.75 LAUNDRY 433013 1003810545 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
202.80
414820 6/8/2017 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
1,387.50 RADIO INSTALLATION 433015 69795 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,387.50
414821 6/8/2017 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN
19.00 CLASS A LICENSE 400249 042716 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
19.00
414822 6/8/2017 140545 ANGELATS, GIOVANNA
100.00 REFUND FOR PLAYGROUND 432659 053017 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
100.00
414823 6/8/2017 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING
2,108.45 432992 81446 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
2,108.45
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 7
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 —
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414823
414824
6/8/2017
6/8/2017
100632 AQUA ENGINEERING
102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
Continued...
1,732.41 FLOWRIDER CHEMICALS 433087 46187 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER
1,732.41
414825 6/8/2017 134924 ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
1,710.27 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 433003 94851660 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,710.27
414826 6 /8/2017 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
571.70 432804 3181903 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
2,387.45 432836 3182320 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
324.36- 432703 385751 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
235.18- 432702 385752 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,399.61
414827 6/8/2017 100639 BAILEY NURSERIES
182.12- 422249 CLM0052353 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
1,773.50 PLANTS AND TREES 432677 INV0501176 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
1,591.38
414828 6/8/2017 129549 BEHLEN, NATE
57.46 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 433046 5302017A 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
57.46
414829 6/8/2017 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.
225.40 433043 D8511026 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
225.40
414830 6/8/2017 125139 BERNICK'S
120.00 432722 361809 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
3,354.15 432720 361810 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
20.00 432748 361815 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
1,999.55 432746 361816 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
2,376.00 432763 361907 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
7,869.70
414831 6/8/2017 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
132.95 432971 464869 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
132.95
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 8
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414831 6/8/2017
414832 6/8/2017
126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
140561 BERUBE, BRIAN
Continued...
370.64 FIRE INSPECTOR II 432892 06022017 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
370.64
414833 6/8/2017 115305 BLENKER, DEAN
134.68 2017 UNIFORM SHORTS AND JEANS 432673 053117 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE
134.68
414834 6/8/2017 140149 BORGSTROM, ERIK JON
533.33 433005 INV-0003 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
533.33 433005 INV-0003 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
533.34 433005 INV-0003 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
1,600.00
414835 6/8/2017 136726 BOSS CONTROL SYSTEMS INC.
30.70 LABELS 432690 502742 5912.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELL HOUSES
30.70 LABELS 432690 502742 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
61.40
414836 6/8/2017 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
264.66 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 433009 82505759 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
264.66
414837 6/8/2017 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
234.50 432788 141848 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
343.50 433067 142196 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
578.00
414838 6/8/2017 120143 BRAKE & EQUIPMENT WAREHOUSE INC.
164.25 AXLE, HUB, SEALS 432838 1-604042 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
164.25
414839 6/8/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
171.57 432734 1080641794 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
2,606.70 432736 1080641795 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
36.68 432726 1080641796 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,559.65 432725 1080641797 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1,424.50 432755 1080641798 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,855.82 432715 1080641799 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 9
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 —
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414839 6/8/2017 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued...
7,654.92
414840 6/8/2017 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC
10,055.83 432790 1090715830 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
74.10 432704 1090715841 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
640.93 432805 1090717245 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
1,238.10 432835 1090717914 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
12,008.96
414841 6/8/2017 103239 BRIN GLASS CO.
91.40 432932 168287D 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
91.40
414842 6/8/2017 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
162.68 MERCHANDISE 432964 927860574 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
357.98 MERCHANDISE 432963 927865819 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
185.18 MERCHANDISE 432965 927865820 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
370.36 MERCHANDISE 432980 927866548 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,076.20
414843 6/8/2017 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
1,680.52 432745 1895435 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
1,349.35 432700 1900216 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
2,346.70 432705 1901132 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
193.35 432747 1903249 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
40.90 432701 254-185 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
20.45 432706 254-186 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
5,631.27
414844 6/8/2017 130603 CEDAR RIDGE LANDSCAPING INC.
4,712.01 FINAL PAY ENG 15-1NB 432679 APPL NO. 4 01263.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS A263 Valley View Landscaping
17,083.91 W LANDSCAPING 432642 APPL. NO 1 01267.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MSA Maintenance Projects
ENG17-4
21,795.92
414845 6/8/2017 105497 CENTRAL ROOFING CO.
265.00 CITY HALL LEAK DETECTION 432912 17211 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL
265.00
414846 6/8/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 10
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/8/2017 -
Doc No Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414846 6/8/2017 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued...
128.90 952 831-0024 432781 0024-5/17 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING
57.43 952 929-0297 433106 0297-5/17 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
55.35 952 920-1565 433103 1565-5/17 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
59.60 952 920-1586 432780 1586-5/17 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
59.60 432765 8632-5/17 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION
453.48 952 927-8861 433105 8861-5/17 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
136.38 E911 432764 9996-5/17 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911
950.74
414847 6/8/2017 140558 CIAGNE, MARK
2,500.00 REFUND DEMO ESCROW 432873 153850 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS
2,500.00
414848 6/8/2017 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
960.00 HVAC INSPECTION SERVICES 432766 14132 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS
960.00
414849 6/8/2017 118580 CITY OF EDINA
217.00 WEDNESDAYS AT WEBER 411378 2016 ART IN THE 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
PARK
217.00
414850 6/8/2017 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL
229.00 KUSKE BACKGROUND SCHOOL 433079 IN00022309 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
229.00
414851 6/8/2017 114548 CIZEK, DARIN
127.52 POLICE WEEK REIMBURSEMENT 432868 053020172 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
127.52
414852 6/8/2017 120433 COMCAST
33.91 CABLE TV 432986 373022-5/17 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
33.91
414853 6/8/2017 130852 COTTEN, JASON
9.63 REIMBURSEMENT 394061 020816 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS
9.63
414854 6/8/2017 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY
148.00 CAR WASH - MAY 2017 433130 464170 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 11
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414854
414855
6/8/2017 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY
123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE & BRICK PAVING INC.
Continued...
6/8/2017
148.00
3,410.00 PAVER REPLACEMENTS 433150 76TH & FRANCE 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
3,410.00
414856 6/8/2017 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS
977.00 JUNE NEWSLETTER 432859 311094 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS
977.00
414857 6/8/2017 102514 CUTTER & BUCK
65.84 MERCHANDISE 432981 93768926 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
140.25 STAFF UNIFORMS 432981 93768926 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
40.72 MERCHANDISE 432977 93776263 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
122.58 STAFF UNIFORMS 432977 93776263 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
369.39
414858 6/8/2017 127913 CUTTER SALES
18.80 V-BELTS 432850 116854 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18.80
414859 6/8/2017 124231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO.
258.21 432880 13806 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE
258.21
414860 6/8/2017 100707 DALE GREEN COMPANY, THE
320.00 BLACK DIRT 433100 060117 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION
320.00
414861 6/8/2017 133734 DALEL, ABDIRAHMAN
338.60 AMBULANCE RECAPTURE REFUND 432638 053117 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
338.60
414862 6/8/2017 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
88.62 BATTERY PRESERVER 433093 179597 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
26.53 WRENCH 432967 182798 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
188.25 SOCKETS 432968 182838 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
63.80 WRENCH 433095 183286 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
119.70 VISE FOR TRUCK 433094 183554 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
486.90
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 12
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 —
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414862 6/8/2017
414863 6/8/2017
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC.
Continued...
6,023.88 433083 DT0001801896 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH
6,023.88
414864 6/8/2017 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL
454.50 5/18-5/31 LESSONS 432887 060217 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
454.50
414865 6/8/2017 101766 DISPLAY SALES
120.00 POW FLAGS 432984 INV-011259 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
504.00 432934 INV-011261 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
624.00
414866 6/8/2017 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS
100.52 CUP DISPENSOR REPLACEMENTS 432658 0102724-IN 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
100.52
414867 6/8/2017 122079 EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES
4,809.75 WINTER SPORTS GYM FEES 432862 PARK & REC 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
PROGRAMS
4,809.75
414868 6/8/2017 101837 EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
25.00 ALARM 433174 10150 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
25.00
414869 6/8/2017 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES
1,592.50 RACE FOR THE CURE 433081 20170606EPR 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT
1,592.50
414870 6/8/2017 103594 EDINALARM INC.
397.58 GOLF DOME ALARM 432928 115247 5210.6250 ALARM SERVICE GOLF DOME PROGRAM
436.05 PRO SHOP ALARM 432927 115320 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE
833.63
414871 6/8/2017 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC.
952.00 WEAR RINGS 432686 0060063-IN 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
952.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page - 13
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414872 6/8/2017 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. Continued...
2,672.50 NEW RADIOS FOR POLICE VEHICLES 433074 MOB031417-2 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
2,672.50
414873 6/8/2017 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC.
1,749.85 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 433002 1903457 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
13.25 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 433001 1909609 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,763.10
414874 6/8/2017 102497 EXPLORER POST 925
1,137.50 RACE FOR THE CURE 433082 20170606EP 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT
1,137.50
414875 6/8/2017 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
126.80- CREDIT MEMO 433022 1-5266083 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
172.64 WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID 433024 1-5267630 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
96.00- CREDIT MEMO 433102 1-5271498 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
355.67 BATTERIES 432848 1-Z11003 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
287.35 BRAKE KIT, HUB ASSY 432947 69-267910 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
114.00 ROTOR 432849 69-268068 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
30.82 WHEEL SEAL 432949 69-268408 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
7.04 WIPER 432945 69-268814 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
85.96 SWAY BAR LINK KIT 432953 69-268833 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
16.85 SWAY BAR BUSHING 432950 69-268834 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
29.81 SWAY BAR BUSHING KIT 432948 69-268879 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
16.85- CREDIT MEMO 432588 69-269047 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6.01 LIGHT 432952 69-269127 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
238.05 BELT, TENSIONER, WIRE KIT 433020 69-269193 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
88.00 V-BELTS 433021 69-269575 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
49.51 TPMS SENSOR 433023 69-269717 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
370.18 ROTOR ASSY'S, BRAKE KITS 433029 69-269815 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
78.52 SHAFT 432966 69-269820 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
103.20 LUBRICANTS 433101 69-270153 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,793.96
414876 6/8/2017 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER
1,746.00 5/18-5/31 LESSONS 432889 060217 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
1,746.00
414877 6/8/2017 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS
461.78 FLANGE KIT FOR RESALE 433096 0239908-1 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 14
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/8/2017 -
Doc No Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414877 6/8/2017 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS Continued...
3,063.67 METER FOR INSTALL IN PARKS BUI 432684 0239909 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
1,364.76 WATER SERVICE REPAIR PARTS 433098 0241180 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
402.80 WATER SERVICE STAND PIPES 433097 0241218 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
5,293.01
414878 6/8/2017 138685 FIRE CATT LLC
3,446.30 ANNUAL FIRE HOSE TESTING 432909 MN-5820 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
3,446.30
414879 6/8/2017 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING
1,275.00 50TH AND FRANCE RAMP WQINDOWS 432942 2315-20947 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
1,275.00
414880 6/8/2017 137554 FRED HOLASEK & SON INC.
3,810.73 PLANTS 433000 00019163 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
3,810.73
414881 6/8/2017 136205 FREEMAN, BRANDON
12.08 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 370078 042015 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
15.60 PARKING REIMBURSEMENT 432672 5292017D 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
191.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 433047 53020179 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
219.64
414882 6/8/2017 100764 G & K SERVICES
48.51 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 432904 6006495708 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE
36.26 LAUNDRY 432903 6006495709 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
19.73 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 432902 6006495710 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION
14.46 UNIFORM RENTAL 2017 432901 6006495711 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
41.74 UNIFORM RENTAL 2017 432900 6006495712 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
48.51 UNIFORM RENTAL 2017 432899 6006506798 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE
36.26 LAUNDRY 432898 6006506799 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
19.73 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 432897 6006506800 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION
14.46 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 432896 6006506801 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
41.74 RENTAL UNIFORM 2017 432895 6006506802 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
147.05 LAUNDRY 432648 6013918053 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL
128.39 LAUNDRY 432649 6013918690 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL
596.84
414883 6/8/2017 103185 GERTENS
651.00 432936 422877/1 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 15
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8 /2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414883 6/8/2017 103185 GERTENS Continued...
651.00
414884 6/8/2017 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC.
1,991.25 433085 7050337 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
1,991.25
414885 6/8/2017 101103 GRAINGER
462.50 RESPIRATOR CARTRIDGES 433016 9455137779 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
125.55 METAL 432976 9457166578 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
82.80 RATCHET CRIMPER 433025 9458071983 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4.46- CREDIT MEMO 433027 9458072007 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
45.36- CREDIT MEMO 433026 9458072015 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
42.12 SUNSCREEN 433028 9458200814 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
152.16 REFLECTIVE TAPE 433028 9458200814 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
57.56 HAND SANITIZING TOWELS 433123 9458200822 5921.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
80.10 2 WALL MOUNT FANS 433165 9460993430 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
15.00 LEATHER SHEATH 433138 9461424666 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
580.33 WELDING GAS 433177 9462897225 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
271.80 POLISHER 433178 9463727504 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,820.10
414886 6/8/2017 102202 GRAND VIEW LODGE
339.18 SEEGER NARC CONFERENCE 433080 R785B4 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
339.18
414887 6/8/2017 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
832.50 432761 22027 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
246.50 432824 MN00022016 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,079.00
414888 6/8/2017 100785 GREUPNER, JOE
9,674.10 LESSON PAYMENTS 432885 060217 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
9,674.10
414889 6/8/2017 140547 GUTERMAN, GALINA
131.00 REFUND FOR SOCCER SHOTS 432664 053017 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
131.00
414890 6/8/2017 140342 HAGE, MATTHEW
15,715.00 DECK RESURFACING PROJECT 432959 JOB 650 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 16
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 —
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414890 6/8/2017 140342 RAGE, MATTHEW Continued...
15,715.00
414891 6/8/2017 129929 HANLY, DUSTIN
10.00 PARKING REIMBURSEMENT 432669 5292017A 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
104.65 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 433050 5302017E 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
114.65
414892 6/8/2017 101733 HANLY, WILLIAM
101.85 UNIFROM JEANS 432875 060117 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
101.85
414893 6/8/2017 139501 HCT
2,412.84 TITLE AND LICENSE 432872 060117 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,412.84
414894 6/8/2017 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
215.20 HYDRANT WRENCHES 432687 H173099 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION
1,409.49 GATE VALVE ASSEMBLY 432683 H191057 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
294.20 6" PIPE FOR REPAIRS 432692 H191589 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
3,503.03 REPLACEMENT HYDRANT 433145 H234421 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
699.87 GATE VALVE REPLACEMENT PARTS 433122 H234443 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
1,432.37 HYDRANT PARTS 433144 H249500 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
7,554.16
414895 6/8/2017 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS
257,045.48 JAN HP INVOICE-ACTIVES 432884 70372509 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
257,045.48
414896 6/8/2017 100799 HEDBERG SUPPLY
119.58 GRAVEL RIVER ROCK 432916 85852 1301.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE
119.58
414897 6/8/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
5,331.25 APRIL CHARGES 432662 1000094142 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES
5,331.25
414898 6/8/2017 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
169.00 HENN CO INFO TECH 433125 1000094781 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
169.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page- 17
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414899 6/8/2017 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG Continued...
8,644.80 COMMUNITY ROOM TABLE 432985 86121474 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT
8,644.80
414900 6/8/2017 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC.
43.04 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 433018 41768548 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
43.04
414901 6/8/2017 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
1,045.50 432699 897064 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
2,190.50 432787 897094 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
2,840.50 432721 897439 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
6,076.50
414902 6/8/2017 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
400.51 CHLORINE, ACID 433160 170512014 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
598.40 HYDROCHLORIC ACID 433162 170519081 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
998.91
414903 6/8/2017 129430 HYDROTECH SYSTEMS LTD
187.60 ANODE 433154 TSF158 5330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FLOWRIDER
1,405.14 NOZZLE FLAP PAD ASSEMBLY 433155 TSF167 5330.6530 REPAIR PARTS FLOWRIDER
1,592.74
414904 6/8/2017 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC
13.06 FILTERS 432841 038004906 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4.72 PLASTIC PIPE 432839 038005192 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
15.12 FILTERS 432840 038005214 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
100.68 LUBRICANTS 432845 038005380 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
3.52 FILTER 432844 038005707 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
14.98 FILTER 432843 038005753 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
5.34 FILTER 432842 038005767 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
157.42
414905 6/8/2017 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY
660.50 432808 51719 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
660.50
414906 6/8/2017 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC.
900.00 SAFETY AUDIT 1 433078 20081325 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOLADMINISTRATION
900.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page- 18 Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414906
414907
6/8/2017
6/8/2017
102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC.
100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE
Continued...
3.59 SCREWS KR 432695 5/17-ELEC 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
8.10 MATERIAL 3 NEW WORKSTATIONS 432695 5/17-ELEC 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
14.23 HEX SET MH 432695 5/17-ELEC 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
14.13 KNIFE BLADE/BIT 432860 5/17-ENG 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION
32.44 FILE/HOLDER, ETC. 432860 5/17-ENG 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
26.02 433019 5/17-EQUIP 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
188.85 PAINT, CARBURETOR, HOOKS 433019 5/17-EQUIP 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
27.64 PW SUPPLIES 432911 5/17-FACILITES 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
86.73 STATION SUPPLIES 433017 5/17-FIRE 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
758.21 432935 5/17-PARKS 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2.40 FOR RADAR TRAILER 432864 5/17-POLICE 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
28.73 PAINT, WOOD FILLER 432930 5/17-STREETS 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
47.99 LAWN SEED 432930 5/17-STREETS 1344.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
73.14 LAWN SEED 432930 5/17-STREETS 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
78.06 TOOLS 432930 5/17-STREETS 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
153.23 GENERAL SUPPLIES 432930 5/17-STREETS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
365.15 SAND AND GRAVEL 432930 5/17-STREETS 1301.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE
263.14 GENERAL SUPPLIES 432930 5/17-STREETS 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
.63 MISC. HARDWARE 433092 5/17-UTILIT 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
5.18 AIR FRESHENERS 433092 5/17-UTILIT 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS
5.90 BULK CORD 433092 5/17-UTILIT 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
7.18 SAMPLE BOTTLE, LANDSCAPE PEGS 433092 5/17-UTILIT 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
7.99 STRAP 433092 5/17-UTILIT 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING
33.01 MISC. PLUMBING 433092 5/17-UTILIT 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
34.21 WELL HOUSE MAINTENANCE 433092 5/17-UTILIT 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES
55.77 MISC. PLUMBING, ADHESIVE 433092 5/17-UTILIT 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
2,321.65
414908 6/8/2017 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
96.00 FLOW RIDER WAIVERS 433166 75080 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION
166.00 SEASON PASS APPLICATION FORMS 433167 75081 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION
262.00
414909 6/8/2017 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
1,879.45 432723 2672977 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
61.50 432729 2672978 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
8,007.20 432744 2672979 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
61.80 432749 2672980 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/6/2017
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page - 19
Business Unit
414909 6/8/2017 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued...
87.65 432751 2672983 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
8,103.60 432809 2672985 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
9.40- 432743 2708799 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
18,191.80
414910 6/8/2017 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
4,992.65 432807 5738042 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
252.67 433073 5738043 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
177.15 433060 5738044 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
260.64 432817 5738045 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
221.06 433059 5738046 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
271.16 432813 5738047 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,664.74 432803 5738049 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
103.01 433058 5738050 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
.20 432783 5738051 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
38.16 432828 5738053 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
1,417.59 432832 5738054 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,143.73 432816 5738055 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
5,665.64 432815 5738056 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
405.80 432831 5738057 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
4,199.11 432814 5738058 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
263.60 432811 5738059 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
616.96 432829 5738060 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,033.03 432830 5738061 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
340.12 432782 5738065 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
1,622.03 432789 5738066 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
7,825.98 432792 5738067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
21.99 432793 5738068 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
112.27 432796 5738069 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
25.16 432797 5738070 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
4,600.12 432786 5738071 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
2,213.17 432785 5738072 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
10.10- 432759 627460 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
50.66- 432760 627640 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
22.74- 432710 627769 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
44.43- 432711 627770 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
6.90- 432712 627771 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
40,352.91
414911 6/8/2017 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 20
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414911 6/8/2017 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY Continued...
724.36 FAN MOTOR 433115 1096682 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
724.36
414912 6/8/2017 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC.
72.30 432881 SI044767 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
72.30
414913 6/8/2017 115192 KNUDSON, DEBORAH
112.50 5/18-5/31 LESSONS 432886 060217 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
112.50
414914 6/8/2017 130042 KULLY SUPPLY INC.
56.80 432879 413168 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
445.29 432878 413220 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
502.09
414915 6/8/2017 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS
138.00 RE CASE #17001210 433070 18354 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
150.00 TOW FEE 432865 77683 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE
288.00
414916 6/8/2017 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
249.12 SCREWS, NUTS,& WASHERS 432917 9304974315 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
68.06 WASHERS 432918 9304976426 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
648.88 ADAPTERS AND FITTINGS 433139 9304987032 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
69.39 HEX CAP SCREW 433090 9304987033 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS
1,035.45
414917 6/8/2017 129955 LIGHTEN UP LLC
2,982.50 PED BRIDGE LIGHTS HWY 100 432957 03036 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
2,982.50
414918 6/8/2017 100558 LIND ELECTRONIC DESIGN CO INC.
109.95 PARKMAINT GETAC CHARGER 432989 325623 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
109.95
414919 6/8/2017 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC.
876.00 433151 21002 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
695.00 433153 21011 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,571.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 — 6/8/2017
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page- 21
Business Unit
414919
414920
6/8/2017
6/8/2017
129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC.
100865MAGNUSON SOD
Continued...
547.00 MULCH 432999 1-189937 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
539.00- MULCH CREDIT 429545 2-194284 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
8.00
414921 6/8/2017 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY
13,212.41 UNLEADED FUEL 432852 314027 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6,662.92- CREDIT MEMO 432063 CM-021620 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
200.25- CREDIT MEMO 432064 CM-037175 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6,349.24
414922 6/8/2017 122878 MARTI', DOROTHEA
288.75 "AGENDA: EDINA" HOSTING FEE 432960 228 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
288.75
414923 6/8/2017 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC.
198.38 OXYGEN - ST. 1 433010 15498223 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
198.38
414924 6/8/2017 118096 M-B COMPANIES INC
1,318.84 SPRAY NOZZLE 433141 218106 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,318.84
414925 6/8/2017 137819 MCCONNACH, COREY
48.15 COREY-MILES 432874 06012017 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENAADMINISTRATION
48.15
414926 6/8/2017 140544 MCDERMID, ERIN
250.00 LESSON REFUND 432890 05302017 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
250.00
414927 6/8/2017 140562 MCGINTY, LARRY
5.11 PARKING PERMIT REIBURSEMENT 432894 060217 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
70.00 PARKING PERMIT REIBURSEMENT 432894 060217 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
75.11
414928 6/8/2017 135299 MCMAYER, CASSANDRA
31.86 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 432857 053017A 1170.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES
136.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 432858 053017B 1170.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE HUMAN RESOURCES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 22
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414928 6/8/2017 135299 MCMAYER, CASSANDRA Continued...
168.82
414929 6/8/2017 134067 METRO BLOOMS
1,066.00 METROBLOOMS WORKSHOP 432893 5/24 WORKSHOP 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
1,066.00
414930 6/8/2017 100885 METRO SALES INC
12.42 433008 INV804092 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
12.42 433007 INV804093 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
24.84
414931 6/8/2017 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE
110.16 PAN ASSY, GASKET, SEALANT 433036 503251 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
110.16
414932 6/8/2017 139880 MID CITY SERVICES - INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY
44.00 ENTRY RUGS 433169 60955 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
44.00
414933 6/8/2017 102769 MILLER, TOM
711.00 5/18-5/31 LESSONS 432888 060217 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
711.00
414934 6/8/2017 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER
1,530.00 REPLACE STAND PIPE 432685 35456 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
1,360.00 STAND PIPE REPLACEMENT 433147 35460 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
240.00 433173 35463 03492.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Morningside A & White Oaks C
2,380.00 REPLACE STANDPIPE 433146 35464 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
5,510.00
414935 6/8/2017 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC.
21.38 433004 928072191 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY
16.09 433064 928072192 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY
5.36 433063 928072193 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
42.83
414936 6/8/2017 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC.
7.74 CONTACTOR 432689 1531755-00 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES
7.74
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 24
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414945 6/8/2017
414946 6/8/2017
103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER
100763 NEOPOST USA INC
Continued...
238.65 POSTAGE MAINT AND RENTAL 432958 54873269 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
238.65
414947 6/8/2017 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
388.50 432730 120976 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
422.00 432825 120977 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
364.50 432741 120978 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
1,175.00
414948 6/8/2017 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH
110.21 MILEAGE FEB-MAY 2017 432882 053017 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS
133.22 SVVTV MILEAGE MARCH-MAY 432883 053117 1132.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CABLE COMMISSION
243.43
414949 6/8/2017 103106 NLSC PRODUCTS INC.
166.20 LED LAMPS 433091 102390 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
79.00 LIGHTS FOR FILTER ROOM 433163 102391 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
245.20
414950 6/8/2017 132509 NOLAN, MARK
141.00 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 432876 060117 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION
141.00
414951 6/8/2017 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC
35.18 LIGHT 433031 43882 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
35.18
414952 6/8/2017 103578 OFFICE DEPOT
109.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 432678 930348167001 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
109.75
414953 6/8/2017 124089 OHMANN, NANCY
25.35 ART WORK SOLD 428922 041217 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
25.35
414954 6/8/2017 138020 PATRICK'S CATERING
61.38 CATERED FOOD 433164 11296 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
61.38
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6 /2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 23
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414937 6/8/2017 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Continued..
22,217.00 STATE TEST FEE 432639 1270011-5/17 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT
22,217.00
414938 6/8/2017 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
35.00 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 433170 711621 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
35.00
414939 6/8/2017 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
261.63 HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL FEE 432970 10000031666 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE
261.63
414940 6/8/2017 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS
148.00 TRESPASS FORMS 432663 22853 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
6.66 433061 22869 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING
6.67 433061 22869 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING
6.67 433061 22869 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING
105.00 PRINTING/PUBLIC ART EDINA 433172 22910 2610.6575 PRINTING PUBLIC ART
273.00
414941 6/8/2017 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP
7.35 GASKET 433037 550119F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
7.35
414942 6/8/2017 101796 MPCA
261.63 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 433171 10000030092 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
261.63 432905 10000030097 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
1,687.50 432698 10000034541 9232.6133 PROFESS SERVICES-ENGINEERING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
2,210.76
414943 6/8/2017 104671 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING LLC
7,500.00 433089 296584 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE
7,500.00
414944 6/8/2017 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS
28.80 WHEEL BEARING 432846 204383 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
28.80
414945 6/8/2017 103056 NELSON AUTO CENTER
25,041.77 MOHAMED'S TRUCK 432665 F37690 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT
25,041.77
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 25
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414954
414955
6/8/2017
6/8/2017
138020 PATRICK'S CATERING
100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
Continued...
1,146.46 432727 8591739 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
229.50 432716 8591742 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
2,260.97 432735 8591743 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
430.60- 432810 8591871-CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
3,206.33
414956 6/8/2017 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
941.47 PEPSI 433158 85248214 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS
945.28 SODAAND WATER 432866 93265117 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
1,886.75
414957 6/8/2017 140127 PETERSON, NATE
8.60 PARKING REIMBURSEMENT 432671 5292017C 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
279.59 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 433048 5302017C 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
288.19
414958 6/8/2017 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
290.00 433066 2168664 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,202.29 432801 2175235 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
65.16 432802 2175236 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
864.09 432821 2175238 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
2,863.85 432820 2175239 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
138.32 432819 2175240 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
89.16 432818 2175241 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
3,069.24 432784 2175244 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
192.00 432837 2175459 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
163.82- 432758 265146 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
8,610.29
414959 6/8/2017 130174 PIONEER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
1,650.00 433088 INV639165 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE
1,650.00
414960 6/8/2017 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH
194.59 HYD HOSE 432975 S2489353.001 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
194.59
414961 6/8/2017 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 26
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 —
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414961 6/8/2017 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC Continued...
530.84 SAND 432998 8399 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
530.84
414962 6/8/2017 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT
16.40 PARKING REIMBURSEMENT 432670 5292017B 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
152.48 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 433051 5302017F 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
168.88
414963 6/8/2017 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC
80.00 SHAARPEN ZAM BLADES 433045 280361 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT
80.00
414964 6/8/2017 123757 RIECHMANN PEDERSON DESIGN INC
3,373.00 ABOUT TOWN AD SALES 432961 517151-7 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
3,373.00
414965 6/8/2017 100981 ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORP.
2,330.22 AIR FRESHNER SERVICES 432925 1337258 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE
2,330.22
414966 6/8/2017 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY
626.70 432719 37-13971 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
626.70
414967 6/8/2017 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA
435.00 432923 4424 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
435.00
414968 6/8/2017 100988 SAFETY KLEEN
124.21 PARTS WASHER CLEANOUT 433175 R002381685 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
124.21
414969 6/8/2017 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC
1,150.00 TRAINING 432853 052517 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
1,150.00
414970 6/8/2017 116644 SANDON, PATRICK
173.20 BOOTS 432891 05312017 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
173.20
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page - 27
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414971 6/8/2017 103015 SCHEERER, JOHN Continued...
110.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 403659 060716 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE
110.00
414972 6/8/2017 103479 SCHULTZ, RYAN
174.28 POLICE WEEK REIMBURSEMENT 432867 053020171 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
174.28
414973 6/8/2017 100349 SCOTT COUNTY
385.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 432869 20170601CD 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
385.00
414974 6/8/2017 101106 SERVICEMASTER
2,550.00 TRASH ROOM FASHION ALLEY CLNG 432991 58230 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
2,550.00
414975 6/8/2017 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
171.33 PAINTING SUPPLIES 433114 5024-8 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
76.39 PAINTING SUPPLIES 433118 5124-6 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
247.72
414976 6/8/2017 140468 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.
102.98 PAINT FOR DECK 432973 0384-3 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
251.24 PAINT FOR RAILING 432651 3823-2 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
257.45 PAINT FOR RAILING 432650 3901-6 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
38.04 PAINT FOR RAILING 432652 4049-3GOLF 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
159.94 PAINT FOR DECK 432974 4071-7 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
54.67 PAINT FOR DECK 432972 4180-6 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
864.32
414977 6/8/2017 101556 SHRED-IT USA
51.90 MAY SHRED SERVICES 432863 8122421483 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
51.90
414978 6/8/2017 139712 SIEBENALER, LAUREN
6.96 MILEAGE 433057 060217 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOVVANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
14.44 MILEAGE 433057 060217 1100.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CITY COUNCIL
160.13 MILEAGE 433057 060217 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS
7.49 MILEAGE 433057 060217 2611.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MUSIC IN EDINA
189.02
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 28
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414979 6/8/2017 131543 SIGNCRAFTERS Continued...
8,400.00 BALANCE-DESIGN SERVICES 432681 52596 47093.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK SIGNAGE IMPRVMNT PROJECT
8,400.00
414980 6/8/2017 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP
256.00 SPRINKLER SYSTEM 433168 83505916 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY
256.00
414981 6/8/2017 131885 SISINNI FOOD SERVICES INC.
40.93 432937 304725 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
40.93
414982 6/8/2017 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC
22.62 432697 80670085 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
126.40 WEED KILLER 432982 80787069 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
149.02
414983 6/8/2017 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL
114.75 CRIMPER WIRE CUTTER 433032 ARV/32721806 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
114.75
414984 6/8/2017 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY
100.00 433069 9437 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
100.00
414985 6/8/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
144.00- 432756 0032470 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
.80 432707 1536739 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
26.56 432733 1549064 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,528.81 432732 1549065 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING
1,687.20 432728 1549066 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
7,867.40 432724 1549067 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
186.73 432754 1549069 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
278.80 432753 1549070 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
3,468.93 432757 1549071 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
1,443.60 432718 1549072 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
3,809.70 432717 1549073 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1.60 432740 1549074 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
15.86 432739 1549076 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
2,103.81 432738 1549077 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
1,047.20 432737 1549078 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/8/2017 — 6/8/2017
No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Page - 29
Business Unit
414985 6/8/2017 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued...
10,538.80 432791 1549079 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
33,861.80
414986 6/8/2017 120155 SOUTHVIEW DESIGN
1,677.05 SPRINKLER-4101 W. 45TH 433039 10732 01422.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 2016 RECON MORNINGSIDE A
1,677.05
414987 6/8/2017 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
257.75 432752 16047 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
292.00 432714 16077 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
549.75
414988 6/8/2017 124631 STUART C. IRBY CO.
115.73 ARC RATED RAIN GEAR 432694 S010198311.001 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
115.73
414989 6/8/2017 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
637.32 TIRES 433030 10146755 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,040.30 TIRES 433142 10146828 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,677.62
414990 6/8/2017 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA
595.09 CONCESSION PRODUCT 433161 147204517 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
504.12 CONCESSION PRODUCT 433157 147263630 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
404.65 CONCESSION PRODUCT 433159 147274229 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
1,503.86
414991 6/8/2017 104932 TAYLOR MADE
145.23 MERCHANIDSE 432979 32547958 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
308.89 MERCHANDISE 432978 32547959 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
454.12
414992 6/8/2017 112362 TEAM LAB
1,831.00 LIFT STATION BUGS 433143 INV0006396 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
1,831.00
414993 6/8/2017 106374 THERMA-STOR LLC
113.79 PUMP 432691 2890175RI 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL HOUSES
113.79
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 30
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
414994 6/8/2017 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA Continued...
330.00 433006 2017-173236 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
330.00 433006 2017-173236 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
330.00 433006 2017-173236 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
990.00
414995 6/8/2017 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC.
309.00 DRAFT 5/16 CC MINUTES 432969 M22946 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
309.00
414996 6/8/2017 119374 TNC INDUSTRIES INC.
597.00 NEW EXHAUST TAIL PIPE 432847 35210 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
597.00
414997 6/8/2017 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
19.49 WELDING ROD 433038 10192249 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
49.02 WELDING WIRE 433140 10192462 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
32.39 WELDING GAS 433033 40065294 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
100.90
414998 6/8/2017 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC.
1,688.65 SOUTH MUNTERS REPAIR 432941 18011 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
628.52 SOUTH COMPRESSOR ROOM FAN 433128 18017 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
800.50 POWER WASH UNITS 433127 18019 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
3,117.67
414999 6/8/2017 123649 TOWMASTER
512.70 SPRINGS 433035 392763 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
512.70
415000 6/8/2017 128835 TOWN & COUNTRY CLEANING CO. INC.
6,745.00 CITY HALL WINDOW CLEANING 432990 W617678 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL
6,745.00
415001 6/8/2017 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION
1,600.00 ARIES PROGRAM UPDATE 432693 98579 1330.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
1,600.00
415002 6/8/2017 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE
131.25 MAY USAGE 433071 269634-6/17 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
131.25
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 31
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
415002
415003
6/8/2017
6/8/2017
131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE
134841 TRUEMAN WELTERS
Continued...
306.34 432640 ID45425 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING
306.34
415004 6/8/2017 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC.
1,274.14 FILTERS 432940 0615895-IN 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
1,274.14
415005 6/8/2017 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
48.75 432877 40078 1642.6547 SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE
90.00 GRASS SEED 433124 40090 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION
138.75
415006 6/8/2017 140009 U.S. KIDS GOLF
530.13 MERCHANDISE 432657 IN1206688 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
530.13
415007 6/8/2017 101058 VAN PAPER CO.
65.60 432915 426129-00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
503.00 432955 426668-00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
8.06 432956 426669-00 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
339.21 432994 426670-00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
96.82 432993 426671-00 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,012.69
415008 6/8/2017 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
50.71 CLARSON IPHONE 432988 9784946307 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING
50.71 RESCUE 91 I PHONE 432988 9784946307 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
132.69 PARK MAINT VERIZON PHONES 432988 9784946307 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
977.13 POLICE VERIZON PHONES 432988 9784946307 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
363.82 PUBLIC WORKS VERIZON PHONES 432988 9784946307 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING)
41.27 SOUTH METRO VERIZON PHONE 432988 9784946307 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY
1,616.33
415009 6/8/2017 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY
560.00 ANNUAL SPRINKLER INSPECTION 432939 SP016750 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
560.00
415010 6/8/2017 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 32
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
415010 6/8/2017 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. Continued...
76.58 FUSES 433149 S000410112.006 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS
99.96 LIGHTS FOR LOBBY 432983 S000462293.001 7411.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY
176.54
415011 6/8/2017 140546 VITT, STEPHANIE
148.00 REFUND FOR HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS 432660 053017 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARKADMIN. GENERAL
148.00
415012 6/8/2017 131542 WAGNER, JOSH
57.46 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 433049 5302017D 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING
57.46
415013 6/8/2017 133515 WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT ADMIN
115.00 WASHINGTON COUNTY WARRANT 432870 20170601MP 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
115.00
415014 6/8/2017 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC.
1,091.27 FUEL 432654 27450 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
315.89 GAS 432655 27451 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
1,407.16
415015 6/8/2017 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C.
174.41 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 432871 300517 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING
174.41
415016 6/8/2017 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
255.48 432675 7134497 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
1,099.96 432806 7135092 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
4.64 432795 7135093 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
773.96 432812 7135095 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
4,821.05 432794 7135096 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
6,955.09
415017 6/8/2017 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE
15.51 432910 14603300 1470.6803 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
16.50 A/C REPAIR MATERIAL 433148 14626600 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL
32.01
415018 6/8/2017 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC.
15.00 SHIPPING CHARGES 433014 E1584540.006 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 33
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 -
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
415018
415019
6/8/2017 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC.
105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
Continued...
6/8/2017
15.00
4,173.00 SOUTHDALE PARKING STUDY 432907 5-0-001686-780 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES
4,173.00
415020 6/8/2017 101726 XCEL ENERGY
3,035.17 51-4159265-8 433111 547306896 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY
52.00 51-4420190-3 432634 547312688 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL
14.93 51-0010619811-5 432633 547410583 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
17.67 51-0160483-1 432771 547417831 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS
28.63 51-0223133-2 432772 547418333 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
83.07 51-6541084-2 432631 547512578 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
100.07 51-6692497-0 432636 547513517 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE
140.51 51-5938955-6 432773 547515640 5937.6185 LIGHT & POWER INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR
78.53 51-9770164-7 432775 547550019 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
23.42 51-9770163-6 432774 547560739 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
64.00 51-0010619455-3 432632 547571280 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
15.30 51-0010777228-2 432776 547571720 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
37.43 51-0011004217-3 432777 547575978 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
24.50 51-0010876028-0 432767 547580278 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
20.72 51-0010876012-2 432768 547582557 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
40.73 51-0011270406-5 432769 547587362 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
46.59 51-0011457579-9 432778 547592807 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
43.56 51-0011289291-5 432770 547595751 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
1,211.83 51-5107681-4 433110 547674655 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
725.84 51-5547446-1 433107 547679801 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS
10,465.95 51-6644819-9 432628 547694086 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
33.14 51-8976004-9 432635 547721388 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
6,860.02 51-9603061-0 433108 547731920 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1,485.88 51-0010060454-7 433109 547734116 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM
29,788.20 51-4621797-2 433104 547845903 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
430.81 51-6229265-9 432629 548034085 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION
1,700.93 432629 548034085 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
9,380.21 51-6955679-8 432630 548041824 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL
27,326.41 51-4888627-1 433112 548196905 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
2,447.99 51-4888627-1 433112 548196905 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
95,724.04
415021 6/8/2017 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:45:49
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 34
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/8/2017 —
Inv No
6/8/2017
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
415021 6/8/2017 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER Continued...
2,805.63 CONTRACTED REPAIR 433034 16545 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,805.63
415022 6/8/2017 102500 ZIMMERMAN, TIM
30.00- UNIFORM SOCKS 432637 053017 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
30.00 UNIFORM SOCKS 432637 053017 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
30.00 UNIFORM SOCKS 432637 053017 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
30.00
879,888.93 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Checks
A/P ACH Payment
Total Payments
803,743.96
76,144.97
879,888.93
R55CKS2 LOGIS1 00
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 161,114.10
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 286.38
02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 54725
02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 112.49
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 47,991.58
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 36,915.57
05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,781.10
05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,883.46
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,640.68
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 37,821.94
05500 ICE ARENA FUND 47,434.83
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 2,447.99
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 13,903.29
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 11,311.51
05800 LIQUOR FUND 172,130.47
05900 UTILITY FUND 63,985.85
05930 STORM SEWER FUND 12,071.30
06000 RISK MGMT ISF 257,045.48
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,776.16
09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,687.50
Report Totals 879,888.93
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 14:46:05
Council Check Summary
Page - 1
6/8/2017 - 6/8/2017
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing polici s and
procedures d
00/1/C4,
WM I i
nanre Director
4'•
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 1
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD
59.89 EASTER EGGS- BUNNY BREAKFAST 431426 AMANDA 3/27 257 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Supplier 139861 OTC BRANDS INC - PCAR D
99.00 431453 AMANDA 3/31 258 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
Supplier 134881 AMAZONRPIME MEMBERSHIP - PCARD
20.96 BUNNY BREAKFAST SUPPLIES 431427 AMANDA 4/14 259 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Supplier 130362 TARGET-PCARD
150.00 WELLNESS CHALLENGE (GC 2PLACE) 431428 AMANDA 4/14 260 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS- PCARD
22.37 EASTER CANDY- BUNNY BREAKFAST 431440 AMANDA 4/14 261 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Supplier 130750 WALGREENS - PCARD
250.00 WELLNESS CHALLENGE (WINNER GC) 431441 AMANDA 4/14 262 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
68.62 SUPERHERO SATURDAY CAPES 431442 AMANDA 4/21 263 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Supplier 135890 JOANN FABRIC - PCARD
86.21 SUGAR COOKIES (BRAEMAR EVENTS) 431443 AMANDA 4/21 264 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
763.76 PRINCESS BALL/SUPERHERO FOOD 431444 AMANDA 4/22 265 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
1,079.99 BUNNY BREAKFAST FOOD 431055 AMY 4/15 235 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Supplier 136657 THE TIN FISH - PCARD
39.00 SCHEDULING APP ADJUSTMENT 431056 AMY 4/17 236 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
120.45 WINE/CANVAS 431057 AMY 4/20 237 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
Supplier 136657 THE TIN FISH - PCARD
8.67 SCHEDULING APP ADDITIONS 431058 AMY 4/21 238 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
475.02 VACUUM 431059 AMY 4/21 239 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
Supplier 140066 AUS VACUUM JANITORIAL - PCARD
5.57 430935 ANDERSON 3/27 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
220
Supplier 132010 ROCKLER WOOD-PCARD
218.96 430936 ANDERSON 3/28 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
219
Supplier 140449 EB ASPHALT BEST MANAG - PCARD
365.82 430934 ANDERSON 4/12 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
221
Supplier 130418 NORTHERN TOOL- PCARD
20.00 WORK IPAD 430940 ANN 4/19 251 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
Supplier 130880 VERIZON WIRELESS - PCARD
75.98 431033 BOB 3/30 72 1641.6556 TOOLS MOWING
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 2
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
130418 NORTHERN TOOL - PCARD
59.70 431034 BOB 3/31 73 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
235.00 CONFERENCE 430793 BRIAN 4/11 169 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
Supplier 139922 U OF M CONTLEARNING - PCARD
99.00 431035 BRIAN 4/15 170 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
44.00 SLUC WORKSHOP - CINDY 431071 CARY 3/27 291 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING
Supplier 130406 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION - PCARD
2.00 PARKING METER - PAID BACK 431438 CARY 3/31 292 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 130647 MPLS METERS MULTI - PCARD
277.86 MATERIALS FOR BRIDGE MEETINGS 430954 CARY 4/18 294 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 133387 BLICK ART - PCARD
19.47 FOOD - PC COMP PLAN WORK SESSI 431072 CARY 4/19 293 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
63.91 MATERIAL FOR BRIDGE MEETING 430948 CARY 4/21 295 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 135890 JOANN FABRIC - PCARD
12.85 BRIDGE MEETING MATERIALS 430956 CARY 4/21 296 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 130362 TARGET- PCARD
16.04 COFFEE FOR BRIDGE MEETING 430950 CARY 4/22 297 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 131258 STARBUCKS - PCARD
115.66 FOOD FOR BRIDGE MEETING 430952 CARY 4/22 298 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 131002 JIMMY JOHNS - PCARD
19.36 FOOD FOR BRIDGE EVENT 430949 CARY 4/22 299 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 131012 SHELL OIL- PCARD
62.67 BRIDGE MEETING FOOD 430951 CARY 4/22 300 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
96.55 COFFEE FOR BRIDGE MEETING 430953 CARY 4/22 301 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 131258 STARBUCKS - PCARD
12.25- SKATE SCHOOL REFUND 431384 CHAD 3/28 124 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION
12.25- SKATE SCHOOL REFUND 431385 CHAD 3/28 125 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION
Supplier 139263 LEARN TO SKATE USA- PCARD
539.75 SOCCER AND LACROSSE EQUIPMENT 430972 CHAD 4/10 127 5552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 140442 BEACON ATHLETICS - PCARD
868.00 MIAMA SPRING CONF 430971 CHAD 4/4 126 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENAADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
163.49 RUN REVIEW 431445 CRAIG 3/27 104 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS PCARD
75.00 FIREFIGHTER LICENSE 431447 CRAIG 4/11 105 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 3
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
75.00 FIREFIGHTER LICENSE 431448 CRAIG 4/11 106 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 140302 DPS FIREFIGHTER LICENSING - PCARD
136.10 RUN REVIEW 431446 CRAIG 4/24 107 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
106.08 431038 DANIEL 3/29 244 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
30.99 BATTERIES 431039 DANIEL 4/14 245 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
150.00 STOP STICK CORDS 431037 DANIEL 4/18 246 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 140452 STOP STICK LTD - PCARD
50.00 431439 DAVE 4/7 243 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 131915 OVVPSACSTATE - PCARD
23.95 431036 DAVID 3/31 287 1495.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS INSPECTIONS
Supplier 130651 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC - PCARD
100.00 MADD BANQUET 431040 DAVID 3/31 52 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 138610 MADD-OL - PCARD
75.00 TRAVIS G. TRAINING 431424 DAVID 4/11 198 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS
75.00 DAVE S. TRAINING 431425 DAVID 4/11 199 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS
Supplier 139922 U OF M CONTLEARNING - PCARD
109.90 GUN PERMITS 431041 DAVID 4/12 53 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130666 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE - PCARD
53.58 DISPATCH WEEK TREATS 431042 DAVID 4/13 54 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130753 DAIRY QUEEN - PCARD
9.98 ORANGES 430943 DAWN 3/31 225 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
Supplier 130362 TARGET- PCARD
39.00 WHEN I WORK 431087 DAWN 4/11 226 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
20.56 ORANGES, GOGURT, BUTTER 430944 DAWN 4/12 227 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
Supplier 130362 TARGET- PCARD
210.82 SANDPAPER, SANDER, LIGHTBULBS 430945 DAWN 4/12 228 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
18.30 WOOD 430946 DAWN 4/12 229 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
50.96 WALL CLOCK 430986 DEB 3/29 330 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
610.00- 431043 DEB 4/12 20 1180.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ELECTION
Supplier 131999 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE - PCARD
103.65 TV 430959 DEB 4/19 332 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 135744 DTV*DIRECTV HARDWARE - PCARD
16.98 ENGRAVED SIGN 430958 DEB 4/7 331 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 4
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
130429 SMARTSIGN - PCARD
148.52 431592 ERIC 4/12 266 1622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING & HOCKEY
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
51.47 431593 ERIC 4/17 267 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
79.99 CAMERA VAN WASH DOWN PUMP 431079 GARY 4/4 275 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING
Supplier 130418 NORTHERN TOOL- PCARD
173.95 REFUNDED 431016 GERALD 3/27 33 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 140300 DAN'S SOUTHSIDE MARINE - PCARD
27.79 PAINT SUPPLIES 431017 GERALD 3/29 34 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
173.95- REFUNDED 430988 GERALD 3/30 35 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
196.26 HVAC DOCK LADDER 430989 GERALD 3/30 36 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 140300 DAN'S SOUTHSIDE MARINE - PCARD
13.16 STORAGE 430990 GERALD 3/31 37 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
126.56 RANGE EXPENSE 430991 GERALD 3/31 38 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
Supplier 132907 OLSEN CHAIN AND CABLE - PCARD
24.45 MAGNET 431001 GERALD 4/12 47 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
4.93 GENERAL SUPPLIES 431002 GERALD 4/19 48 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
184.76 GENERAL SUPPLIES 430973 GERALD 4/19 49 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130430 HOMEDEPOT.COM - PCARD
59.85 AMMO 430974 GERALD 4/19 50 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 132886 ARNZEN ARMS - PCARD
42.90 HOSE CART 430975 GERALD 4/23 51 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
37.42 BATTERIES 430992 GERALD 4/3 39 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
31.60 BATTERY/ MAGNET 430993 GERALD 4/3 40 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130430 HOMEDEPOT.COM - PCARD
44.93 LIGHTBULBS 430996 GERALD 4/6 43 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
16.60 GENERAL SUPPLIES 430997 GERALD 4/6 44 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
58.95 GENERAL SUPPLIES 430998 GERALD 4/7 45 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 140437 GREEN LIGHT DEPOT - PCARD
11.37 SHIPPING COST 431000 GERALD 4/7 46 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 133727 SQ*POSTAL DISPATCH BUSIN-PCARD
21.43 LIGHTBULBS 430994 GERALD 4/8 41 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 132882 ACE HARDWARE - PCARD
71.92 GENERAL SUPPLIES 430995 GERALD 4/9 42 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL Page- 5
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
130689 DICK'S CLOTHING & SPORTING - PCARD
60.45 TOOLS 430979 GREG 3/27 128 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
48.10 TOOLS 430981 GREG 3/30 129 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
13.70 GENERAL SUPPLIES 430982 GREG 4/1 130 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130430 HOMEDEPOT.COM - PCARD
78.21 TOOLS 430984 GREG 4/11 132 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
225.25 TOOLS 430985 GREG 4/19 133 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130430 HOMEDEPOT.COM - PCARD
25.24 TOOLS 430983 GREG 4/6 131 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
7.89 431736 GREGORY 4/10 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
102
9.99 431737 GREGORY 4/24 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
103
1.49 431729 GREGORY 4/3 100 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
10.03 431735 GREGORY 4/3 101 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
Supplier 131250 LUNDS - PCARD
39.00 TRAINING 431060 GUNNAR 3/28 108 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 135734 ASE TEST FEES - PCARD
40.07 CENTER ARM REST 431061 GUNNAR 3/29 109 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD
403.50 GLOVES 431062 GUNNAR 3/30 110 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 139914 NITRILEGLOVES - PCARD
131.55 REPLACEMENT CAMERA 431063 GUNNAR 3/31 111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 140440 ROSCO INC - PCARD
114.00 WATER TANK 431068 GUNNAR 4/13 117 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD
77.78 FLOOR PAN 431069 GUNNAR 4/14 118 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 134143 ROCK AUTO-PCARD
39.00 TRAINING 431070 GUNNAR 4/14 119 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 135734 ASE TEST FEES - PCARD
392.87 SAFETY NUT 431081 GUNNAR 4/18 120 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
39.39 PHONE COVER 431083 GUNNAR 4/18 122 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 131604 DISCOUNTCELL- PCARD
39.00 TRIANING 431082 GUNNAR 4/19 121 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 135734 ASE TEST FEES - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL Page- 6
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
237.90 FLOOR MATS 431084 GUNNAR 4/24 123 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
90.00 TRAINING 431064 GUNNAR 4/3 112 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 139859 MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES - PCARD
75.00 TRAINING 431080 GUNNAR 4/4 113 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 135734 ASE TEST FEES - PCARD
41.23 TRAINING BOOK 431065 GUNNAR 4/4 114 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 131246 ADVANSTAR COMMUNICATIONS - PCARD
59.10 PHONE COVER 431066 GUNNAR 4/5 115 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 131604 DISCOUNTCELL- PCARD
211.29 COVER 431067 GUNNAR 4/6 116 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 140441 BELSON OUTDOORS - PCARD
250.00- BCA CREDIT MENDEL 431671 JASON 3/24 74 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD
100.00 HOTEL DEPOSIT PLEAA 431673 JASON 3/27 76 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00 KARKHOFF PLEAA HOTEL DEPOSIT 431674 JASON 3/27 77 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00 KOLLODGE PLEAA HOTEL DEPOSIT 431715 JASON 3/27 78 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130896 CRAGUNS LODGE - PCARD
75.00 ZECH DMT RECERT 431672 JASON 3/29 75 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE
Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD
15.00 NREMT MKI 431723 JASON 3/30 79 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
15.00 NREMT MKI 431724 JASON 4/1 80 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
15.00 NREMT MKI 431725 JASON 4/1 81 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 136647 NATIONAL REGISTRY EMT - PCARD
20.30 WEST CONDESSOR REPAIR 430930 JASON 4/11 271 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT
Supplier 130430 HOMEDEPOT.COM - PCARD
200.02 SOTA HOTEL 431711 JASON 4/11 88 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
200.02 SOTA HOTEL 431712 JASON 4/11 89 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
200.02 SOTA HOTEL 431713 JASON 4/11 90 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
200.02 SOTA HOTEL 431695 JASON 4/11 91 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 131892 BEST WESTERN - PCARD
5.48 ICE FOR INSERVICE 431698 JASON 4/12 92 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
193.10 4/12 INSERVICE MEAL 431699 JASON 4/12 93 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 135383 NOODLES & COMPANY - P CARD
7.70 430931 JASON 4/13 272 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS - PCARD
80.42 NOTE BOOKS 430933 JASON 4/13 274 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 131619 OFFICE DEPOT- PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL Page - 7
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued-.
20.33 BLINDS 430932 JASON 4/14 273 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
125.00- EMOTIONAL SURVIVAL REFUND CANC 431700 JASON 4/14 94 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 133705 ACT"ATOM-PCARD
17.23 INSERVICE SNACKS AND ICE 431701 JASON 4/19 95 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
82.77 4/19 INSERVICE MEAL 431702 JASON 4/19 96 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 140439 BAJA SOL-PCARD
144.96 SHOT TIMER 431728 JASON 4/4 82 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
250.00 BOERGER STRESS TRAUMA BURNOUT 431706 JASON 4/4 83 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
125.00 TOWNSEND POLICE AND THE PRESS 431707 JASON 4/4 84 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
125.00 TOWNSEND POLICE AND THE PRESS 431707 JASON 4/4 84 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD
65.33 INSERVICE COLAAND WATER 431708 JASON 4/6 85 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD
75.00 MARTIN DMT RECERT 431709 JASON 4/6 86 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DVVI FORFEITURE
75.00 ANDERSON DMT RECERT 431710 JASON 4/6 87 2340.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DWI FORFEITURE
Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD
70.00 430941 JEFF 4/17 284 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
323.08 430942 JEFF 4/19 285 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
Supplier 130377 RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LODGE - PCARD
149.85 UNIFORMS 431449 JEFFREY 3/29 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
277
Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD
866.57 AED 431450 JEFFREY 3/30 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
278
Supplier 140453 FOREMOST MEDICAL EQUIP - PCARD
105.75 BATTERIES 431451 JEFFREY 4/21 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
279
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
25.73 FIREFIGHTER WIPES 431452 JEFFREY 4/24 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
280
Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD
399.00 ARCHIVE SOCIAL SUBSCRIPTION 431430 JENNIFER 3/27 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
134
Supplier 136288 ARCHIVESOCIAL.COM - PCARD
53.63 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - CARON 431429 JENNIFER 3/29 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 8
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD
135
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
Continued...
183.60 CITY EXTRA-APRIL 431433 JENNIFER 4/10
138
Supplier 135752 MAILCHIMP - PCARD
1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
53.63 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - EIDSNESS 431436 JENNIFER 4/12
139
1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
53.63 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - BENNEROTT 431437 JENNIFER 4/13
140
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
29.95 FRESHBOOKS SUBSCRIPTION 431470 JENNIFER 4/17
141
Supplier 132480 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS - PCARD
1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
5.00 BLOG SPAM FILTERING -APRIL 431432 JENNIFER 4/18
142
Supplier 130401 AKSMT.COM - PCARD
1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
120.00 TOGGL SUBSCRIPTION 431434 JENNIFER 4/21
143
Supplier 138136 TOGGL- PCARD
1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
8.52 EMAIL LIST CLEANUP 431435 JENNIFER 4/6
136
Supplier 136291 BRITEVERIFY - PCARD
1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
59.98 PHOTO CHALLENGE CANVASSES 431431 JENNIFER 4/6
137
Supplier 139924 WINKFLASH - PCARD
1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
45.99 BATTERIES 431051 JOSEPH 3/28 281 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
90.05 FLOWERS 431051 JOSEPH 3/28 281 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
622.39 GOLF SHOP /A9 TV'S 431051 JOSEPH 3/28 281
Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD
5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE
74.93 DUCT TAPE TV MOUNTS 430828 JOSEPH 3/28 282
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
26.82- CARPET SAMPLE RETURN 431050 JOSEPH 3/29 283
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE
12.69 431467 JOSHUA 3/31 252 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
50.00 431465 JOSHUA 4/13 255
Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD
5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
26.33 431468 JOSHUA 4/21 256 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL
26.33 431468 JOSHUA 4/21 256 5840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
26.34 431468 JOSHUA 4/21 256 5860.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 9
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
58.96 431469 JOSHUA 4/3 253 5840.6106 MEETING EXPENSE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
58.97 431469 JOSHUA 4/3 253 5860.6106 MEETING EXPENSE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
58.97 431469 JOSHUA 4/3 253 5820.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 50TH STREET GENERAL
Supplier 135364 EINSTEIN BROS BAGELS - PCARD
25.08 431466 JOSHUA 4/6 254 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD
53.63 CREATIVE CLOUD 431021 KATHARINE 4/16 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
249
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
34.85 STAMPS FOR EDINA LIQUOR ADVERT 430999 KATHARINE 4/21 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
250
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD
9.99 ICONS USED FOR EVERY DEPT 431019 KATHARINE 4/5 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
247
Supplier 138384 NOUNPROJECT.COM - PCARD
9.75 AWARD ENTRY MAILING 431046 KATHARINE 4/7 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS
248
Supplier 130548 USPS - PCARD
39.04 BREAK ROOM SUPPLIES 430976 KATHRYN 3/29 69 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
56.99 430977 KATHRYN 4/22 70 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION
58.50 BREAKROOM SUPPLIES 430978 KATHRYN 4/25 71 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
10.00 M HODKINSON- COURT DATE 431405 KELLY 3/30 209 1170.6106 MEETING EXPENSE HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 134363 IP JACKSON RAMP - PCARD
363.00 NPELRA KELLY 431406 KELLY 3/31 210 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 130386 DELTAAIR - PCARD
10.00 PARKING- CONFERENCE 431409 KELLY 4/12 213 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 133973 IMPARK 00200149 - PCARD
35.00 JOB POSTING 431410 KELLY 4/14 214 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
Supplier 133708 CRAIGSLIST.ORG-PCARD
25.00 NPELRA LUGGAGE FEE 431472 KELLY 4/21 217 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 130386 DELTAAIR - PCARD
5.36 CAR RENT- KC TO PAY BY CHECK 431979 KELLY 4/22 215 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 140447 DOLLAR RENTA CAR - PCARD
33.86 NPELRATRANSP TO HOTEL KC 431411 KELLY 4/22 216 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
6.09 NPELRA MN DINNER TRANSP 431412 KELLY 4/25 218 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 140448 UBER US - PCARD
125.00 LEHRN KELLY 431407 KELLY 4/3 211 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 10
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
125.00 LEHRN- SARAH 431408 KELLY 4/5 212 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 136638 LEADING EDGE HUMAN RESOUR - PCARD
23.00 PARKING 431375 KYLE 3/28 200 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE
Supplier 133973 IMPARK 00200149 - PCARD
739.44 SUBSCRIPTION 431382 KYLE 3/30 201 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES
Supplier 132720 STAR TRIBUNE - PCARD
160.00 GFOA CONFERENCE 431379 KYLE 4/21 207 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE
Supplier 133585 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICE - PCARD
19.95 PAYPAL 431380 KYLE 4/3 202 1160.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES FINANCE
Supplier 130375 PAY FLOW PRO - PCARD
29.99 IDENTITY GUARD 431376 KYLE 4/3 203 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE
Supplier 138122 IDENTITY GUARD - PCARD
39.05 PAYPAL 431381 KYLE 4/3 204 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
Supplier 130375 PAY FLOW PRO - PCARD
219.40 GFOA CONFERENCE FLIGHT 431378 KYLE 4/7 206 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE
Supplier 130682 UNITED AIR - PCARD
20.13 GFOA TRAVEL INSURANCE 431377 KYLE 4/8 205 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE
Supplier 131781 TRAVEL INSURANCE POLICY- PCARD
88.00 VOLGISTICS 430969 LISA 3/27 240 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 134155 VOLGISTICS INC - PCARD
10.00 DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS 430970 LISA 4/3 241 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 138626 YOUCANBOOKME - PCARD
25.00 MEMBERSHIP 431052 MARY 3/28 288 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 137786 PROSOURCE WHOLESALE PENN -PCARD
87.55 POR SHOP SHADES 431054 MARY 4/19 289 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
214.50 CABINET - SCORECARDS 431053 MARY 4/25 290 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
Supplier 131490 PIER 1 - PCARD
407.65 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 431005 MICHAEL 4/17 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
329
Supplier 140455 PLUNKETTS - PCARD
6,204.08 BLDG-GEN SUP DISHWASHER 431004 MICHAEL 4/4 328 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
Supplier 137190 THE VVEBSTAURANT STORE - PCARD
84.73 SMART SALTING TRAINING 431045 MILLNER 3/30 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
302
Supplier 130378 PANERA BREAD - PCARD
35.17 COOKIES/WATER-MTG 431023 MILLNER 4/10 01441.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES Birchcrest A
308
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 11
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
134.43 ASPHALT/ROAD TAPES 431024 MILLNER 4/13 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION
309
Supplier 138042 IN *TIMEMARK INC - PCARD
30.00 CTS SPRING LUNCHEON 431025 MILLNER 4/19 1261.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
310
30.00 CTS SPRING LUNCHEON 431026 MILLNER 4/19 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL
311
Supplier 139922 U OF M CONTLEARNING - PCARD
360.00 AIS GRANT 431030 MILLNER 4/20 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
313
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD
30.00 CTS SPRING LUNCHEON 431027 MILLNER 4/21 1262.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRANSPORTATION
312
30.00 CTS SPRING LUNCHEON 431029 MILLNER 4/21 1262.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRANSPORTATION
314
Supplier 139922 U OF M CONTLEARNING - PCARD
77.18- 431044 MILLNER 4/5 303 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Supplier 140313 WVVVV.BATTERYSHIP.COM - PCARD
58.24 TURFGRASS WORKSHOP 431047 MILLNER 4/5 304 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS - PCARD
32.16 TURF MAINT WORKSHOP 431018 MILLNER 4/6 305 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
Supplier 130378 PANERA BREAD - PCARD
29.40 STAMPS 431020 MILLNER 4/7 306 01441.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES Birchcrest A
Supplier 130548 USPS-PCARD
159.71 TURF MAINT WORKSHOP 431022 MILLNER 4/7 307 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
Supplier 130551 JASONS DELI - PCARD
395.00 OUR LIFE EXHIBIT BOOTH 430939 NICOLE 4/14 99 1628.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER SENIOR CITIZENS
Supplier 136138 ECM PUBLISHERS INC- P CARD
35.90 CENTER EVENT SUPPLIES 430938 NICOLE 4/15 98 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
Supplier 130389 MICHAELS - PCARD
50.00 MASS CONFERENCE-HOTEL 430937 NICOLE 4/6 97 1628.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SENIOR CITIZENS
Supplier 131892 BEST WESTERN - PCARD
75.00 KEITH R - CHIEF C BOILER LICEN 431032 NOAH 4/17 269 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
100.00 ELECTRICAL EMPLOYER LICENSE 431003 NOAH 4/21 270 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
48.00 TERRY K- PL LICENSE RENEW 431031 NOAH 4/3 268 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD
95.00 WCCO VIDEO 431413 PATRICIA 3/28 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
195
Supplier 140446 NORTHSTAR MEDIA SERVICES - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 12
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued-.
35.48 METER RENTAL 431415 PATRICIA 4/11 5710.6235 POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
197
Supplier 130400 PITNEY BOWES - PCARD
100.00 POSTAGE REFILL 431414 PATRICIA 4/7 5710.6235 POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
196
Supplier 132711 POSTAGE REFILL - PCARD
12.74 MN-TF1 JPA POSTAGE 431423 PETER 4/20 222 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
11.00 MN-TF1 TRAINING EXPENSE 431421 PETER 4/24 223 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 131002 JIMMY JOHNS - PCARD
15.96 MN-TF1 TRAINING EXPENSE 431422 PETER 4/24 224 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
22.30 TAX COURT SEMINAR 431006 ROBERT 4/10 26 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING
Supplier 133994 SQ *PARK CAFE GC INC - PCARD
15.00 TAX COURT SEMINAR 431007 ROBERT 4/10 27 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING
Supplier 131995 GOVT MPLSPARKING - PCARD
200.00 SUMMER SEMINARS 431008 ROBERT 4/11 28 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING
Supplier 130410 APPRAISAL INSTITUE - PCARD
156.54 BOARD OF APPEAL 431012 ROBERT 4/13 29 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING
Supplier 130374 D BRIAN'S DELI - PCARD
4.99 BOARD OF APPEAL 431009 ROBERT 4/13 30 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
200.00 TRENDS SEMINAR 431011 ROBERT 4/14 32 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING
Supplier 130410 APPRAISAL INSTITUE - PCARD
180.00 TRENDS SEMINAR 431010 ROBERT 4/15 31 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING
Supplier 130413 MN ASSOC OF ASSESSING - PCARD
272.08 WHEEL CHAIR 431416 ROGER 4/1 230 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
Supplier 139853 IQ DESIGN PRODUCTS - PCARD
115.75 WHEEL CHAIR 431417 ROGER 4/2 231 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
288.00 SANDBAGS FOR BOUNCE HOUSE 431418 ROGER 4/4 232 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
Supplier 140450 SANDBAG STORE LLC - PCARD
134.17- FOAM FOR PEAK 431419 ROGER 4/6 233 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
125.07 FOAM FOR PEAK 431420 ROGER 4/6 234 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
7.00 PARKING 431383 ROXANN 4/5 242 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 140451 LOOP PARKING 23 - PCARD
55.48 APPLE KEYBOARD 431473 RYAN 3/27 144 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 13
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
68.96 CABLES FOR FIRE 431474 RYAN 3/28 145 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
353.26 IT TOOLS 431494 RYAN 3/28 146 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
51.48 IT TOOLS 431475 RYAN 3/30 147 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
25.98 SPARE CABLES 431477 RYAN 3/31 149 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
379.00 FILE TRANSFER SOFTWARE 431478 RYAN 3/31 150 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 140443 LIQUIDFILES - PCARD
60.00 IT SOFTWARE 431476 RYAN 4/1 148 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 139656 REALTIMEBOARD.COM - PCARD
40.00 SHAREFILE SERVICE JULIE DAVE 431495 RYAN 4/10 159 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
94.09 SHAREFILE SERVICE 431495 RYAN 4/10 159 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 139266 NLI*SHAREFILE - PCARD
180.64 INVESTIGATIONS PCS 431496 RYAN 4/11 160 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE-PCARD
67.42 KEYBOARD FOR CHRIS 431486 RYAN 4/12 161 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
28.88 REPLACEMENT CORD 431487 RYAN 4/12 162 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
227.14 HEADSETS 431488 RYAN 4/15 163 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
45.98 REPLACEMENT KEYBOARD 431489 RYAN 4/15 164 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
47.96 REPLACEMENT MICE 431491 RYAN 4/19 165 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
47.94 WIFI FOR SQUADS 431490 RYAN 4/19 166 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
107.22 IT SOFTWARE 431492 RYAN 4/20 167 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 140444 CBI*CLEVERBRIDGE INC - PCARD
319.90 WIFI FOR SQUADS 431493 RYAN 4/21 168 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
11.94 TABLET SCREEN SHIELDS 431479 RYAN 4/4 151 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
375.00 IT TRAINING 431480 RYAN 4/4 152 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 134136 LYNDA.COM - PCARD
9.99 ANDROID APP FOR METER TABLET 432503 RYAN 4/5 153 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
Supplier 130428 GOOGLE - PCARD
41.93 IT TOOLS 431481 RYAN 4/5 154 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE-PCARD
52.57 IT SUPPLIES 431482 RYAN 4/6 155 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
31.99 IT SUPPLIES 431483 RYAN 4/6 156 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 14
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
14.85 IT SUPPLIES 431484 RYAN 4/8 157 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
124.66 IT SUPPLIES 431485 RYAN 4/9 158 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
117.60 GALLERY WORKSHOP LUNCH 430784 SANDRA 4/22 276 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
Supplier 130679 PINSTRIPES - PCARD
99.00 VIDEOBLOCKS SUBSCRIPTION 431714 SCOTT 3/27 179 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 136772 VIDEOBLOCKS 866-282-5360 - PCARD
515.00 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 431454 SCOTT 3/28 21 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 136621 ACT*GTS MCMA CONFERENCE - PCARD
1,074.95- RETURN OF LED PANEL LIGHT 431716 SCOTT 3/31 180 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 131597 B & H PHOTO-VIDEO.COM - PCARD
45.09 SVVTV WORKSHOP ADVERTISING 431717 SCOTT 3/31 181 1132.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CABLE COMMISSION
50.00 FACEBOOK POST BOOSTS 431718 SCOTT 3/31 182 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD
135.00- CONFERENCES/MEETINGS 431506 SCOTT 4/11 24 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 133236 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES - PCARD
109.91 SPRINT BILL 430962 SCOTT 4/14 25 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130407 SPRINT-PCARD
49.00 NAGC WEBINAR 431727 SCOTT 4/19 188 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 140445 NATIONAL ASSOCIATON OF GO - PCARD
45.00 DIFFUSERS FOR DSLRS 431703 SCOTT 4/19 189 1130.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 130898 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE - PCARD
279.00 ADOBE PREMIERE PLUGIN SOFTWARE 431704 SCOTT 4/20 190 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 136753 FASTSPRINGSOFTWARE.COM - PCARD
53.63 CREATIVE CLOUD 431705 SCOTT 4/21 191 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
25.00 DIETRICH NATOA TRIP INSURANCE 431694 SCOTT 4/21 192 1132.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CABLE COMMISSION
Supplier 130385 EXPEDIA- PCARD
356.40 DIETRICH NATOA TRIP FLIGHT 431696 SCOTT 4/21 194 1132.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CABLE COMMISSION
Supplier 132914 SUN COUNTRY - PCARD
2.77 MUSIC FOR EDEN PRAIRIE VIDEO 431697 SCOTT 4/24 193 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 134734 APL*ITUNES.COM/BILL - PCARD
26.43 MEETING EXPENSES- FOOD 430961 SCOTT 4/3 22 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130368 EDINA GRILL - PCARD
50.32 FLOWERS FOR SVVTV PRODUCER 431719 SCOTT 4/4 183 1132.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE COMMISSION
Supplier 139161 TLF FLOWERS OF EDINA- PCARD
53.63 CREATIVE CLOUD 431720 SCOTT 4/5 184 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
53.63 CREATIVE CLOUD 431722 SCOTT 4/6 186 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 15
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
975.00 NATOAAWARD ENTRIES 431721 SCOTT 4/7 185 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 140180 NATOA- PCARD
165.00 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 430968 SCOTT 4/7 23 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 136621 ACT*GTS MCMA CONFERENCE - PCARD
6.77 GOPRO CASE LATCH 431726 SCOTT 4/8 187 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE-PCARD
24.42 431986 STEVEN 3/26 315 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
6.52 431987 STEVEN 3/28 316 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS-PCARD
10.71 431988 STEVEN 3/28 317 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY
23.92 431988 STEVEN 3/28 317 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD
67.79 431973 STEVEN 4/10 321 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
7.49 431974 STEVEN 4/12 322 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier 130362 TARGET-PCARD
29.90 431976 STEVEN 4/14 324 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD
28.50 431975 STEVEN 4/15 323 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
28.50 431975 STEVEN 4/15 323 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
28.50 431975 STEVEN 4/15 323 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
Supplier 138130 RETAIL INFORMATION TEC - PCARD
6.43 432201 STEVEN 4/17 325 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier 130362 TARGET- PCARD
81.60 431977 STEVEN 4/18 326 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier 132309 EDINA LIQUOR YORK- PCARD
83.46 431971 STEVEN 4/2 318 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
Supplier 140454 TRUE MORAN - PCARD
26.65 431978 STEVEN 4/21 327 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
29.90 431978 STEVEN 4/21 327 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD
11.11 432200 STEVEN 4/3 319 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier 140454 TRUE MORAN - PCARD
23.92 431972 STEVEN 4/7 320 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
52.71 431972 STEVEN 4/7 320 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD
80.00 VOLUNTEER AWARD RECPETION 431085 SULEKHA 3/28 55 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 133968 EDINA STORE - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 16
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued-.
280.77 GENERAL SUPPLIES 430963 SULEKHA 3/28 56 5902.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
337.63 CITY COUNCIL MEETING 431013 SULEKHA 3/29 57 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 135150 LEEANN CHIN - PCARD
525.00 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 430980 SULEKHA 3/30 58 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
300.00 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 430965 SULEKHA 4/10 62 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 139893 ACT*MNGTS.ORG IT- PCARD
75.00 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 430966 SULEKHA 4/10 63 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 140438 MINNESOTAASSOCIATIO - PCARD
237.12 MEETING EXPENSES- FOOD 430967 SULEKHA 4/17 64 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130378 PANERA BREAD - PCARD
346.84 CITY COUNCIL MEETING FOOD 430960 SULEKHA 4/18 65 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 136657 THE TIN FISH - PCARD
28.60 GENERAL SUPPLIES 430964 SULEKHA 4/19 66 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
49.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 431094 SULEKHA 4/20 67 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 134881 AMAZONRPIME MEMBERSHIP - PCARD
199.53 MEETING EXPENSES- FOOD 430987 SULEKHA 4/24 68 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130679 PINSTRIPES - PCARD
3,646.39 2017 VOLUNTEER AWARDS RECEPTIO 430947 SULEKHA 4/3 59 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
198.74 COUNCIL MEETING FOOD 431014 SULEKHA 4/4 60 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
345.58 COUNCIL MEETING FOOD 431015 SULEKHA 4/4 61 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 136657 THE TIN FISH - PCARD
1,000.64 RAMP CIGARETTE STATIONS 431093 TIM 4/7 208 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
Supplier 137190 THE WEBSTAURANT STORE - PCARD
27.08 GENERAL SUPPLIES 431386 TOM 3/28 1 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
71.36 TV MOUNT 431457 TOM 3/29 171 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
12.93 SCREWS 431458 TOM 3/29 172 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
46.52 VALVE, NOZZLE 431387 TOM 3/31 2 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
13.13 SHIPPING 431464 TOM 4/10 178 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130524 THE UPS STORE - PCARD
46.50 TABLE GLIDES 431393 TOM 4/10 8 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 140436 ALL GLIDES - PCARD
35.06 CHAIR TIPS 431395 TOM 4/12 10 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 17
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued-.
346.79 BUILDING SUPPLIES 431396 TOM 4/12 11 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130430 HOMEDEPOT.COM - PCARD
35.99- CREDIT 431394 TOM 4/12 9 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
74.07 SOCKET EXTENDERS 431397 TOM 4/16 12 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
29.00 SCHEDULING PROGRAM 431398 TOM 4/17 13 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
241.37 WEED ROLLER 431399 TOM 4/18 14 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
174.36 DOG BAGS 431400 TOM 4/18 15 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 140028 DOG POOP BAGS.COM PCARD
472.23 GENERAL SUPPLIES 431401 TOM 4/18 16 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
63.23 COMMAND STAFF MEETING 431028 TOM 4/18 286 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130523 DAVANNI'S - PCARD
74.90- CREDIT 431402 TOM 4/20 17 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
257.25 PAINTING SUPPLIES 431403 TOM 4/20 18 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130404 MENARDS-PCARD
34.40 REGISTER TAPE 431404 TOM 4/21 19 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
41.02 PAINT SUPPLIES 431459 TOM 4/3 173 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
45.86 PAINT SUPPLIES 431460 TOM 4/3 174 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
Supplier 130404 MENARDS-PCARD
409.99 MOWER 431388 TOM 4/3 3 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 133987 POWER EQUIPMENT - PCARD
21.67 PAINT SUPPLIES 431461 TOM 4/4 175 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
Supplier 133402 HIRSHFIELDS - PCARD
85.92 PAINT SUPPLIES 431462 TOM 4/4 176 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
19.28 PIPE 431463 TOM 4/5 177 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
821.13 FLOORING, STOOLS, SUPPIES 431389 TOM 4/5 4 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
3.92 LICENSE FEE 431390 TOM 4/6 5 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
160.00 PB LICENSES 431391 TOM 4/6 6 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
Supplier 140435 SOUTH DALE SERV CTR - PCARD
113.81 GLIDES, STAIN, SUPPLIES 431392 TOM 4/7 7 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
46,243.10
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:30:56
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 18
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20170508 5/8/2017 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
46,243.10 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Checks
EFT Payments
Total Payments
46,243.10
46,243.10
R55CKS2 LOGIS100
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 26,311.96
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 225.00
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 1,000.64
04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 64.57
05100 ART CENTER FUND 6,849.78
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 1,967.45
05500 ICE ARENA FUND 979.25
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 539.75
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 1,195.87
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,182.59
05800 LIQUOR FUND 979.95
05900 UTILITY FUND 459.80
05930 STORM SEWER FUND 694.84
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,751.95
07500 MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 39.70
Report Totals 46,243.10
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2017 9:31:01
Council Check Summary Page- 1
12/22/2016 - 12/22/2016
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
p/rocedures date
Finance Director
NA Manager
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.C .
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Kelly C urtin, Human R esources Direc tor
Item Activity:
Subject:2017-2018 C ity Insuranc e R enewals Ap p ro val Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
M otion to approve the renewal of the C ity's insurance coverage and payment according to the staff
recommendations below.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
S taff has worked with the broker and L M C I T to analyze cost. S taff recommends renewal of the C ity's 2017-
2018 insurance through L M C I T with the following options:
1) Workers' C ompensation R enewal with $10,000 deductible premium option (same coverage as last year);
2) P roperty/L iability I nsurance with the $75,000 deductible option and the optional coverage as shown on the
R enewal P remium S ummary (same coverage as last year with a different deductible arrangement);
3) Adding the additional coverage of E xcess L iquor L iability and D ata S ecurity (new coverage addition).
P lease see the attached S taff R eport with information and recommendations regarding the C ity insurance
renewals for 2017-2018.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Staff Report 2017-2018 City Ins urance Renewals
LMCIT Workers ' Comp Renewal Premium Summary
Renewal Premium Summary
June 14, 2017
Mayor and City Council
Kelly Curtin, Human Resources Director
2017-2018 City Insurance Renewals
Information / Background:
Edina is a member of the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). LMCIT is a
cooperative joint-powers organization and member premiums contribute to a jointly owned
fund. The money in the fund is then used to pay members’ claims, losses, and expenses. Because
LMCIT's purpose is to meet cities’ coverage and risk management needs, and not to make a profit,
income not needed for operations or reserves is returned to member cities in the form of a
dividend. Edina became a member of LMCIT in 2014, and received dividends of $9,311 in 2015 and
$22,097 in 2016.
2017 Workers’ Compensation Renewal
The 2017-2018 estimated total premium for worker’s compensation is $600,293 compared to last
year’s estimate of $578,164. The increase is due primarily to increased payroll cost estimates.
2017 Property/Casualty Renewal
Deductible: For each claim submitted, the City pays the full claim amount up to the per occurrence
deductible.
Aggregate Deductible: The maximum the City is required to pay in total claims for the policy year.
Once the City has reached the aggregate deductible limit, the City would pay $1,000 per occurrence
thereafter.
To stay with the same coverages and deductibles, our total premiums would be $640,234, an
increase of approximately 6% over last year’s premium.
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Deductible Limits
If we increase our deductible limits, from $50k/$100k/$1k to $75k/$150k/$1k, our total premiums
would decrease to $528,667, a savings of $75,484 over last year.
Current Deductible Limits: $50,000 per occurrence/$100,000 annual aggregate deductible.
Estimated maximum risk: Estimated premium ($640,234) + Annual Aggregate Deductible ($100,000)
= $740,234
Recommended Deductible Limits: $75,000 per occurrence/$150,000 annual aggregate deductible.
Estimated maximum risk: Estimated premium with an increase in deductible limits ($528,667) +
Annual Aggregate Deductible ($150,000) = $678,667
By increasing our deductibles, our estimated premium, which is a set cost, would decrease from
$640,234 to $528,667, easily offsetting the $50,000 increased risk in the annual aggregate
deductible.
There are two additional coverages being recommended:
• Excess Liquor Liability- This coverage would supplement our current $1,000,000 liquor
liability coverage and provide an additional $1,000,000 in coverage. This coverage level is a
new option from LMCIT. Adding this coverage would cost an additional $1,995 to our
renewal premium.
• Data Security- Increase to the Data Security (part of our Cyber Security coverage) from
$250,000 to $500,000. This coverage level was not offered in the past. Adding this coverage
would cost an additional $1,946 to our renewal premium.
After reviewing deductible and additional coverage options, the recommendation is to renew the
policy with the $75,000/$150,000 deductibles and add excess liquor liability and additional data
security coverage. The estimated total premium with these changes would be $532,608, a total
savings of approximately $71,543 in premium costs over last year.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.D.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Kelly C urtin, Human R esource Direc tor
Item Activity:
Subject:Liability C o verage S tatutory Limits Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
M otion to approve refusing to waive municipal tort liability limits.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
C ities that purchase municipal liability coverage from the L eague of M innesota C ities I nsurance T rust (L M C I T )
must decide each year whether they are willing to waive the monetary limits on tort liability that are offered to
cities under M innesota S tatutes 466.04. I f a city refuses to waive the liability limit, the maximum monetary
damages a claimant can recover is generally no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits
apply. I n addition, the total all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory
tort limits apply would be limited to $1,500,000.
I f a city decides to waive its liability limit, a single claimant could recover up to $2,000,000 for a single
occurrence. T he total all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence would also be limited to
$2,000,000. I f the C ity chose to waive the limits, it would need to pay additional premiums and would have
greater exposure for future claims.
B ecause the C ity of E dina purchases its municipal liability coverage from the L M C I T, the C ity C ouncil must
take action on this matter. S taff is not authorized under statute to make this decision. O nly a C ity C ouncil can
decide to waive the city’s statutory tort limits.
S taff recommends the C ouncil refuse to waive the municipal tort liability limits, as we have in the past.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.E.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R eq uest F or P urc has e
F rom:Jos eph M. Abood, G eneral Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:R eques t fo r P urchas e: Braemar G olf C o urse - 2018
G o lf C ar Leas e
Action
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve 2018-2023 G olf C ar L ease for B raemar G olf C ourse through the local E -Z -G O distributor, Versatile
Vehicles .
Approve trade in of our current golf car fleet that we own and apply the proceeds to the lease of new golf cars.
T he proposal was written utilizing the N ational I ntergovernmental P urchasing Alliance (N I PA) C ompany that
T he City of E dina is part of.
N I PA # R 161101
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
P lease see attached R equest for P urchase.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Reques t For Purchas e Staff Report
E-Z-GO Vehicle Propos al
NIPA E-Z-GO
NIPA/E-Z-GO Executive Summary
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Date: June 20, 2017
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director
Subject: Request for Purchase - Braemar Golf Course Golf Car Lease
Purchase
Subject to:
☐List Quote/Bid
☒State Contract
☐Service Contract
The
Recommended
Bid is:
☒Within Budget
☐Not Within Budget
Versatile Vehicles Inc.
This Request for Purchase is to enter into a Golf Car Fleet lease agreement with Versatile
Vehicles, Inc. beginning in August of 2018. A Vehicle Proposal was provided by Versatile Vehicles,
Inc. that utilizes the National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance (NIPA) Company that The
City of Edina is part of.
The Vehicle Proposal is for a 5 ½ year lease with an option to terminate 1 year early with no
penalty. This will give Braemar the option to get a new golf car fleet in 4 ½ years. The
manufacturer warranty is for 4 years, however Versatile Vehicles as agreed to extend the
warranty for an additional ½ year free of charge.
As part of the proposal, Braemar will be trading in eighty-five (85) used E-Z-GO TXT Golf Cars.
These include forty-six (46) 2010 E-Z-GO TXT Electric Golf Cars, thirty-one (31) 2010 E-Z-GO
TXT Gas Golf Cars, three (3) 2007 E-Z-GO TXT Gas Golf Cars and five (5) 2006 E-Z-GO TXT
Gas Golf Cars for a total trade in value of $142,500 that will be applied to the lease of the new
golf car fleet.
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
May 9, 2017 August 9, 2017
Company: Amount of Quote or Bid:
Versatile Vehicles
17136 Adelmann Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
Lease Payment per month - $6,847.50
Lease Payment per year - $41,085
Total Lease Payment thru 2023 - $225,967.50
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Information/Background:
Budget Impact
In this proposal, staff is recommending to transition from owning golf cars to leasing them. The proposal
was written utilizing the National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance (NIPA) Company that The City of
Edina is part of.
The present fleet is from 2010 and earlier and is outside its useful lifespan. Substantial Repairs &
Maintenance expenses are required on an annual basis to keep the fleet operational.
The recommended plan is to enter into a 5 ½ year lease with an option to terminate 1 year early if we
renew with Versatile Vehicles. This is the least expensive lease option which also gives us the benefit of
getting new cars when the warranty runs out on the fleet.
Price per car per month $ 82.50
Total lease expense per year $ 41,085.00
Projected Golf Car Revenue Per Year $ 350,000.00
As part of the proposal, Braemar will be “trading-in” the present fleet and applying the proceeds of the
trade-in to a new lease in 2018.
Trade in value of present fleet $ 142,500.00
Environmental Impact
The new golf car fleet will be all electric which has less of an impact on the environment than our current,
older mixed fleet of gas and electric. Electric golf cars produce no emissions.
E-Z-GO is committed to the environment. Built around a sport that respects the beauty of the
environment, E-Z-GO strives to reduce energy costs in its manufacturing and to produce energy efficient
products with minimal environmental impact.
By installing high-efficiency lighting in its factories and offices, energy usage has been reduced by about 7%
per year. Its plants operate on a four-day week, further reducing energy and water use. Closed-loop
oil/water separators have been implemented to lessen the amount of water needed to wash its vehicles.
Through research and development, E-Z-GO has made the electric-powered models of its RXV line more
efficient. The electric model uses an ultra-efficient alternating current drive that makes it more cost
effective to operate and drive, increasing efficiency by up to 30%.
Not only does E-Z-GO recycle cardboard, paper, plastics, metals and wooden pallets to reduce the
company’s landfill waste, but it also uses some parts made of 100% recycled content in its products.
Page 3
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Director Authorization: ________________________________________
City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Community Impact
Electric golf cars provide an upscale, quiet experience for not only the golfing patrons but the
community as well.
An all-electric golf car fleet will reduce emissions within the community.
An all-electric golf car fleet will reduce the noise level within the community.
Choice of Body Colors:
Choice of Sun Top Colors:
Choice of Seat Colors:
HUNTER GREEN
STONE BEIGE
STONE BEIGE
X
X
X
0
ZG
A Textron Company
-Vehicle Proposal-
Date: May 9, 2017
Prepared By: Gaby Accad
President / Owner
Jim Wall, Sales Manager
Versatile Vehicles, Inc.
17136 Adelmann Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
800-678-1123 Toll Free
952-894-9670 Fax
www.versatilevehicles.com
"Your Exclusive E-Z-GO Distributor"
Prepared For: Braemar Golf Course
6364 John Harris Drive
Edina, MN 55439
NIPA 21694
NIPA# R161101
Contact: Joe Abood
Title: Manager
Phone: 952-903-5754
FAX: 952-903-5750
Cell:
eMail: JAbood(W.EdinaMN.gov
Qty
New
Vehicle Information: 81 2018 E-Z-GO RXV Golf Car ( Green)
48 Volt , AC Drive with Automatic Brakes
2 2018 E-Z-GO RXV Gas Golf Car ( Ivory) Ranger Cars
13 HP Kawasaki Engine
Standard Accessories: Reverse Warning Indicator / Console With Tee, Ball, and 4 Cup Drink Holder /
Center Basket / Bagwell Liner / Front and Rear Energy Transfer Bumpers
Optional Accessories: X Sun Top X Wheel Covers
X Message Holder X Custom Logo
X Fold Down Windshield X Battery Fill System
X Number Decals X USB Port
X Rain / Club Protector
Trade In ( 46 ) 2010 E-Z-GO TXT Electric @ $1,450 $ 66,700.00
Vehicle Information: ( 31 ) 2010 E-Z-GO TXT Gas @ $2,100 $ 65,100.00
( 3 ) 2007 E-Z-GO TXT Gas $1,400 $ 4,200.00
( 5 ) 2006 E-Z-GO TXT Gas @ $1,300 $ 6,500.00
Total Trade Value $ 142,500.00
- Page 1 of 2 -
;
A Textron Company
Versatile Vehicles, Inc.
17136 Adelmann Street SE
Prior Lake, MN 55372
800-678-1123
www.versatilevehicles.com
"Your Exclusive E-Z-GO Distributor"
Lease Options: Five and half year lease after using equity from trades
5.5 Year
Price / Car / Month $ 82.50
Price / Fleet / Month $ 6,847.50
Price / Fleet / Year $ 41,085.00
Schedule of Payments : 2018 Three Payments of $6,847.50 in Aug, Sept & October totalling $20,542.50
2019 Six Payments of $6,847.50 in May to October totalling $41,085
2020 Six Payments of $6,847.50 in May to October totalling $41,085
2021 Six Payments of $6,847.50 in May to October totalling $41,085
2022 Six Payments of $6,847.50 in May to October totalling $41,085
2023 Six Payments of $6,847.50 in May to October totalling $41,085
3 payments in 2018, August, September and October
Six payments per year May to October in 2019, 2020, 2021,2022 and 2023
Under the 5.5 year lease term, Braemar will have the option to early terminate
the lease at the end of 2022 ( 1 Year Early), without any penalties as long
as Braemar resign a new 4 or 5 year lease agreement with Versatile Vehicles
Since the golf cars are covered with a four year warranty and Braemar will
use the fleet for 4.5 year, Versatile will extend the warranty on the batteries
for 1/2 a year free of charge
Warranty: - Four Year Limited Factory Warranty
Special
Considerations:
- At the end of the lease , Versatile will retain ownership of the fleet
- Trade-in vehicles shall be picked up by Versatile Vehicles at no
additional cost
PRICES QUOTED ARE EFFECTIVE AT THE TIME OF THE PROPOSAL. PRICES GUARANTEED SUBJECT TO
ACCEPTANCE WITHIN 30 DAYS AND PENDING CREDIT APPROVAL PRICES UNLESS INDICATED, DO NOT
INCLUDE ANY FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL TAXES. AT THE TIME VERSATILE VEHICLES RECEIVES THE
TRADE -INS, THE CARS MUST BE IN FLEET RUNNING CONDITION, INCLUDE ALL ACCESSORIES AND BE
FREE OF ANY LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES. CARS NOT IN THE ABOVE DESCRIBED CONDITION, SINCE THE
EVALUATION WILL BE ADJUSTED IN VALUE. YEAR OF GOLF CARS WILL DETERMINE THE TRADE-IN VALUE
Proposed By:
Gaby Accad
Title: President / Owner
Versatile Vehicles, Inc.
Date: May 9, 2017
Accepted By:
Joe Abood
Title: Manager
Braemar Golf Course
Date:
- Page 2 of 2 -
Page 1 of 3
Golf, Utility and Hospitality Carts, Parts, Accessories, Supplies and Related Services
Executive Summary
Lead Agency: Region 4 Education Service Center (ESC) Solicitation: 16-11
RFP Issued: September 16, 2016 Pre-Proposal Date: September 21, 2016
Response Due Date: October 11, 2016 Proposals Received: 5
Awarded to: EZGO Division of Textron, Inc.
The Region 4 Education Service Center (ESC) Department of Procurement issued RFP #16-11 on September 16,
2016 to establish a national cooperative contract for Golf, Utility and Hospitality Carts, Parts, Accessories,
Supplies and Related Services.
The solicitation included cooperative purchasing language in Section A. Introduction:
I. Background on Region 4 Education Service Center
Region 4 Education Service Center (“Region 4 ESC” herein “Lead Public Agency”) on behalf of
itself and all state, local governments, school districts, and higher education institutions in the
United States of America, and other government agencies and non-profit organizations (herein
“Participating Agencies”) solicits proposals from qualified Offerors to enter into a Vendor Contract
(“contract”) for the goods or services solicited in this proposal.
Contracts are approved and awarded by a single governmental entity, Region 4 ESC, and are
only available for use and benefit of all entities complying with state procurement laws and
regulations (public and private schools, colleges and universities, cities, counties, non-profits, and
all governmental entities). These types of contracts are commonly referred to as being
“piggybackable”.
Region 4 ESC’s purchasing cooperative was established in 1997 as a means to increase their
economic and operational efficiency. The purchasing cooperative has since evolved into a
National Cooperative used to assist other government and public entities increase their
economical and operational efficiency when procuring goods and services.
Notice of the solicitation was sent to potential offerors, as well as advertised in the following:
• Region 4 Education Service Center (ESC) website
• National IPA website
• USA Today, nationwide
Page 2 of 3
• Arizona Business Gazette, AZ
• San Bernardino Sun, CA
• Honolulu Star-Advertiser, HI
• The Advocate – New Orleans, LA
• New Jersey Herald, NJ
• Times Union, NY
• Daily Journal of Commerce, OR
• The State, SC
• South Carolina website/newsletter
• Houston Community Newspapers, Cy Creek Mirror, TX
• Deseret News, UT
• Richmond Times, VA
• Seattle Daily Journal of Commerce, WA
On October 11, 2016 proposals were received from the following offerors:
• Cruise Car
• EZGO Division of Textron, Inc
• Kandi Kountry DBA Towmaster
• Taylor Dunn
• Vantage Vehicle
The proposals were evaluated by an evaluation committee. Using the evaluation criteria established in the RFP,
the committee elected to award to EZGO Division of Textron, Inc.
Region 4 Education Service Center (ESC) executed a contract with effective date of January 1, 2017.
Contract includes:
• Bad Boy Off-Road Vehicles
• Cushman Haulers
• EZGO Golf Cars
• Utility Vehicles (turf and industrial)
• Transportation Vehicles (shuttles)
• Hospitality Vehicles (Refreshers)
• Road Legal Low Speed Vehicles
• AWD Vehicles
• Stampede
• Accessories/Parts
• Free Goods Program
Term:
Initial three year agreement from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019 with the option to renew
for two (2) additional one-year periods through December 31, 2019.
Page 3 of 3
Pricing/Discount: Percentage discount off of MSRP
National IPA Web Landing Pages: http://www.nationalipa.org/Pages/Contracts-search.aspx?k=ezgo
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.F.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:C ary Teague, C o mmunity Development Directo r
Item Activity:
Subject:F inal R ezoning & S ite P lan and S ite Improvement
P erformance Agreement - R es olution No. 2017-60 &
O rd inance No . 2017-05 Edina Market S treet LLC .
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Adopt R esolution N o. 2017-60; grant second reading of O rdinance No. 2017-05 approving F inal R ezoning from
P C D -2 P lanned C ommercial D istrict to P U D -12, P lanned U nit D evelopment; and approve the Site
I mprovement P erformance Agreement.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
O n M ay 2, 2017, the C ity C ouncil approved P reliminary R ezoning and P reliminary D evelopment P lan.
T he applicant has submitted F inal P lans that are consistent with the approved P reliminary P lans.
T he City Attorney drafted the S ite I mprovement P erformance Agreement & and the applicant is in agreement.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Res olution No. 2017-60
Ordinance No. 2017-05
Applicant City Res pons e Letter
Final Plans and Narrative - 1 of 2
Final Plans and Narrative - 2 of 2
Final Cons truction Phas ing Plan
Final Architectural Drawings
Final Landscape Drawings
Final Civil Drawings
Approved Preliminary Plans
City Engineer - Review Memo (June 14, 2017)
Site Improvement Performance Agreement
Member Fis cher Pres entation
1 | P a g e
EDINA
COLLABORATIVE
MIXED USE
Final Rezoning Narrative
June 2, 2017
2 | P a g e
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................... 3
EXISTING LAND USE ........................................................................................................................................... 4
ZONING CLASSIFICATION ..................................................................................................................................... 5
SURROUNDING AREA ZONING ............................................................................................................................. 5
BUILDING DESIGN .............................................................................................................................................. 6
Parking ...................................................................................................................................................... 7
Storm water Management ....................................................................................................................... 8
Screening ................................................................................................................................................... 8
Signage ...................................................................................................................................................... 8
Lighting ..................................................................................................................................................... 9
Landscaping Plan .................................................................................................................................... 10
Plaza ........................................................................................................................................................ 11
Public Art ................................................................................................................................................. 11
Sustainability ........................................................................................................................................... 12
PROJECT USES ................................................................................................................................................. 12
Retail ....................................................................................................................................................... 12
Housing ................................................................................................................................................... 13
SOUTHDALE AREA DESIGN PRINCIPLES ................................................................................................................ 14
MAINTENANCE ................................................................................................................................................ 17
TIMING AND PHASING ...................................................................................................................................... 17
PUBLIC BENEFIT .............................................................................................................................................. 18
Project Deviations ................................................................................................................................... 18
Project Benefits ....................................................................................................................................... 19
SKETCH PLAN RESPONSE ................................................................................................................................... 19
2a | P a g e
Table of Contents - Attachments
Community Outreach……………………………………..………………………………………………………………………………….23
Project Renderings……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..33
Shadow Study…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….39
Project Matrix............................................…………………………………………………………………………………………..40
Landscape Approach...............................................................................................................................41
Building Materials...................................................................................................................................52
Construction Phasing..............................................................................................................................53
Site Plan Updates/ Landscape Approach................................................................................................58
Watershed District Letter.......................................................................................................................77
Energy Design Assistance Program Application......................................................................................78
Existing Site Photos.................................................................................................................................79
Forestry Letter........................................................................................................................................80
3 | P a g e
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND
As Edina residents that live within blocks of 50th & France, Peter Deanovic of Buhl Investors and Brent
Rogers of Saturday Properties are very pleased to join together as Edina Market Street LLC in submitting
this application for the Edina Collaborative project. The proposed plan contemplates redeveloping
approximately 2.86 acres at 50th & France from a parking facility into a mixed-use development that will
promote continued retail activity, expanded residential options and cultural gathering space. This plan is
very similar to the concept plan that was selected by the HRA last summer as part of the RFP process and
considers the feedback we’ve received through over 140 stakeholder meetings.
By the numbers, Edina Collaborative includes:
• $80,000,000 of new development
• 110 new units of rental housing
• 582 new structured parking stalls
• 35,000 SF of new commercial/retail space
• 34,000 SF of public plaza, sidewalks, and woonerf to activate the streetscape
In order to realize this ambitious project, Buhl and Saturday have assembled a best-in-class team of design
professionals and consultants. Our team started this process with urban design principles, including the
Southdale Design Guidelines. The aim was toward maximizing pedestrian experience rather than building
footprint. This guided the design to not only fit into the fabric of the existing neighborhood, but to
enhance the connectivity to the surrounding neighborhood. The plan is intended to carry forward many
of the charming attributes of 50th & France by introducing an element of intrigue that draws you around
and through the project.
The highlights of the project in the attached application include:
• New high-quality housing options, including affordable housing, for residents to live within a
vibrant, walkable district
• Expanded and improved public parking including the replacement of an aging, non-handicap
accessible 40 year old parking structure
• Activating both sides of 49.5 street with wider, improved sidewalks, and retail storefronts fronting
both the street and the new plaza/woonerf
• A year-round central gathering area that can create pedestrian activity and host community
events
• Premium building materials and features gathered from the surrounding architecture and quaint
European villages that create a timeless design for both the buildings and public realm
• Project density and height focused south of 49.5 street, within the core of the business district,
away from the residential areas to the north and west
• Articulated building height and setbacks, providing a pleasant pedestrian experience and the
sense of multiple smaller structures
4 | P a g e
• Sustainable initiatives such as pervious pavers, green roof area, bicycle racks and repair areas,
green screen walls, LED lighting and extensive energy saving and planning measures to reduce the
carbon footprint of the development.
• Permanent and rotating public art opportunities throughout the project to enhance cultural
experience
• Retains and expands the existing North Ramp, retaining the significant value of 260+ existing
parking spaces
• Woonerf (shared vehicular/pedestrian courtyard) provides convenient delivery and drop off/pick
up for existing businesses on the north side of 50th street that are currently fronting the surface
lot and center ramp
• Development will provide a catalyst for adjacent development through wider sidewalks and
enhanced connectivity through the district
The Edina Collaborative presents a one-of-a-kind opportunity to activate the 49.5 street corridor and
extend the vibrancy that exists at 50th and France. Our team has a wealth of experience with similarly
ambitious redevelopment projects and looks forward to working with the City of Edina to make the Edina
Collaborative vision a reality.
EXISTING LAND USE
The property is comprised of a north and south (central) parcels. All of the properties are currently owned
by the Housing Redevelopment Authority (“HRA”) and service the 50th and France Business District with
free public parking.
HISTORY
Prior to the HRA’s ownership the parcels were used as a mixture of parking, commercial office and retail
buildings. Commercial uses included office space and multiple dry cleaners. In 1975 the existing central
parking structure was constructed which replaced surface parking improvements. At the time of
construction the city created a TIF district to pay for the public improvements.
In 2013 the city acquired the former Edina Realty building from Eberhardt to allow for the expansion of
parking facilities. On August 17, 2016 the city issued an RFP to the development community aimed at
delivering additional parking, expanded commercial space, increased tax base and assembly of adjacent
parcel. The principles of Edina Market Street LLC and their development team comprised of Kimley-Horn,
Damon Farber, and Mohagen Hansen were selected on December 20, 2016.
Today the properties provide a total of 562 parking spaces, comprised of 262 within the existing north
parking structure and 300 within the central parking structure and surface lot. There are two existing
buildings on the Hooten Dry Cleaning site, but the balance of the subject properties are utilized as parking
facilities.
5 | P a g e
ZONING CLASSIFICATION
The existing zoning of the Subject property is Planned Commercial District 2 (PCD-2), however the
property is currently owned by the Housing Redevelopment Authority and is being utilized for 50th &
France Business District parking. The proposed plan requests rezoning into a Planned Unit Development
that is reflective of the proposed plan.
SURROUNDING AREA ZONING
The land uses in the surrounding 1,000 foot radius can be separated into four general areas/uses as
detailed below:
- North (White Oaks/49th Street Neighborhood): This portion of the city is currently zoned as a mix
of R-2 and R-1 properties. The majority of the immediately adjacent properties are held by
investors and currently accommodate renters. It is unlikely that these uses will change in the
future, thus, the development plan aims toward beautifying the views for these residents and
limiting any impact additional activity might have.
- West: This portion of the city is comprised of two uses: (1) Automobile Parking District and (2)
Country Club Residential Neighborhood
o Automobile Parking District is currently home to a mix of tenants that includes US Bank,
Lunds, Zel Skin Specialists and the USPS building.
o The Country Club neighborhood is comprised of single family homes. Many of the
residents within this neighborhood enjoy the close proximity to 50th & France and
frequent it by foot or bike.
- South: The majority of neighbors to the south are single and two story retail buildings. These
buildings enjoy direct access to 50th & France. It is intended that retail uses within the proposed
development will be complimentary to these uses.
- East: The property is immediately adjacent to Spalon and Bespoke, less than a block to France
Avenue. On the Eastern portion of France Avenue is Minneapolis, which includes additional retail
within the Pinehurst Building. That structure was built in 2000 with the use of TIF.
The majority of these areas have been guided and zoned for land uses which promote commerce and
housing. The proposed plan takes non-code compliant parking structures and turns them into a mixed use
building that is consistent with 5000 France, the most recent 50th & France Edina development.
Project Summary
Acres Description
Current
Rentable SF
Current
Taxes
Current
Parking
Subject Property
3930 W 49 ½ St 0.37 Vacant Land 0 0
North Ramp 262
3936 W 49 ½ St 0.57 Existing North Parking 0 0
3940 W 49 ½ St 0.15 Existing North Parking 0 0
Dry Cleaners
3944 W 49 ½ St 0.24 Dry Cleaners 0 0
Central Parking Structure 300
Unassigned 0.34 Central Surface Parking 0 0
Unassigned 0.46 Central Surface Parking 0 0
Unassigned 0.27 Central Parking 0 0
Unassigned 0.23 Central Parking 0 0
Unassigned 0.23 Central Parking 0 0
Total 2.86 562
Existing Conditions
6 | P a g e
BUILDING DESIGN
The property is being developed to address the needs of today’s residents and
positioned as a premier retailer location. The developer has utilized design
concepts from the nation’s most successful mixed-use developments and has
modeled the façade materials by cataloging existing buildings throughout the 50th
& France district.
The proposed plan incorporates modifications from the sketch plan design that
are reflective of feedback received during extensive discussions with residents,
planning commission and businesses. Through this robust design process the
project team drew from the following regions as ways of bringing charm and a
timeless aesthetics to the district:
• Back Bay, South End and Dudley Square (Boston, MA)
• Vail Village (Vail, CO)
• Strasberg, Toulouse, Lille, and Montpellier (France)
• Berlin, Hanover, Leipzig Square (Germany)
• Vienna (Austria)
The configuration of the building elevations and exterior material selection has been
oriented toward delivering the appearance of approximately six distinct buildings.
Each design, while separate, is rooted in historical context. The development team
aimed to accomplish this through the following separate aesthetics:
1) Parisian/Edina Mansard Roof
2) Back Bay Brownstone
3) Cut Stone Modern
4) Prairie Style
By modulating materials and façade setbacks, the development team sought to emulate the organic
building assembly found throughout the 50th & France neighborhood. Doing so also helps to facilitate a
pedestrian experience that draws residents and visitors through the district.
Careful consideration was taken to ensure the retail spaces were
designed to accommodate long term success. It was important to
evaluate the ways in which pedestrians would circulate the site,
ensuring each suite opens to the exterior plaza/walkways without
steps, and that storefronts face all parts of the development. The space
configuration has been constructed in such a way that suites sizes are
flexible and the duct work required for restaurants can be
accommodated.
Building setbacks along 49 ½ Street and on the north of the 50th Street
dual-frontage buildings have been increased to allow for increased
pedestrian safety, better flow, additional landscaping, and flexible use of space.
7 | P a g e
The central building height responds to feedback received at planning commission by modulating height
and façade while taking into account the economics required to deliver the public components of the
project. In evaluating height, the development team canvased the 50th & France district and determined
the highest elevation was in the apartments off 49th Street and very similar at the Lanterns Condominiums.
These structures, while less than six-stories, are elevated from the street. The phase 2 project height of
74’ seemed to be comparative to these structures considering street setbacks, overall impact to neighbors
and after evaluating shadow impacts. To that end, the development team was purposeful in positioning
this density away from residential with the majority of the shadows impacting the northern parking retail
suites. In an effort to maximize the pedestrian experience, the majority of the project also steps back from
the 1st and 2nd levels to create a podium. This approach is consistent with other residential projects found
throughout Edina.
Parking
The project accommodates for passenger vehicles in residential and retail and provides 439 new public
parking spaces and 143 new spaces for Housing. It also takes into account the requirements for temporary
delivery vehicle parking. The total parking configuration is summarized as follows:
The parking structure to the north will be expanded by 311 stalls in one contiguous parking structure. In
connection with these improvements, the existing ramp will be extended to both the east and west. These
improvements will include the addition of a new stair tower and elevator located along the far eastern
property line. Ground level retail will be accommodated in each of the new wings and access parking
directly from those spaces.
The central parking structure will be removed to accommodate a 268 stall new underground parking
structure. This will service both the residences and retailers above grade. The lowest level of parking will
have secure access for residences and the upper level open to the public. Each level of the parking
structure will be serviced by three stairwells strategically located across the central parcel to ensure easy
retail access, as well as a central elevator that provides immediate plaza access.
Commercial loading and unloading will be provided through a combination of a one-way woonerf, existing
ally (between current central ramp and spalon) and street loading. This system was designed to be as
close to existing conditions as possible, recognizing that this feature is important to existing and new
retailers. During construction the project team requests city support in utilizing the two existing curb cuts
along 50th for existing retail businesses.
Visitor pick up and drop off is provided through a combination of dedicated 15-min underground parking
stalls and three parallel parking stalls located along the woonerf. This amenity is provided in response to
multiple neighbor meetings and aimed at accommodating a variety of retailers throughout the district.
8 | P a g e
BICYCLE PARKING
The proposed project incorporates the City of Edina’s Comprehensive Bicycle
Transportation Plan recommendations. The project improves safety by
providing well defined crosswalks for navigation across the district,
incorporates bike storage and repair stations that emphasize bicycling as a base
for community health and a means of useful transportation in Edina. The plan
accommodates a total of 175 bicycle parking stalls distributed throughout the
site. Additionally, a bike repair station is anticipated on the western corner of
the property for public use.
Stormwater Management
The preliminary storm water management facilities have been designed to comply with the City of Edina
and Minnehaha Watershed Management Commission rules. Overall, the development will decrease the
amount of impervious surface by 10% through the use of green initiatives and pervious surfaces.
EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
South of 49 ½ Street exists a surface parking lot and a parking structure (the ‘Middle Ramp’) with
associated sidewalks, alleys, and a small amount of raised planter beds immediately south of the parking
structure. Stormwater runoff is collected in a series of catch basins and runs directly to the City’s MS4 in
49 ½ Street.
North of 49 ½ Street exists the former Hooten Cleaner building, a parking structure (the ‘North Ramp’)
and a vacant parcel which was formerly the Edina Realty Site. Stormwater runoff is collected in a series of
catch basins and runs directly to the City’s MS4 in 49 ½ Street.
There is soil and groundwater contamination onsite due to past dry cleaner uses on the Hooten Cleaner
parcel and the former Edina Realty parcel.
PROPOSED DRAINAGE CHANGES
The project will utilize pervious pavers in public gathering spaces and alleys. Decorative concrete will be
intermittently used for wayfinding, design aesthetics, or where truck movements are required. Additional
stormwater mitigation will be provided through the use of green roofing material as part of the
sustainability initiatives.
Screening
The project purposefully incorporates parapet screening of any rooftop mechanical units and barriers
within the north parking ramp to shield surrounding residents from any vehicle lights. All parapets will be
compatible with the exterior building materials and green areas strategically placed throughout the
property to ensure adequate screening. Trash receptacles will be provided within the buildings and
parking ramps, shielded from public view.
Signage
The proposed plan requires re-using existing wayfinding signs and supplementing with additional building
signs as proposed below:
9 | P a g e
BUILDING IDENTIFICATION
The proposed development requests signage similar to the Mixed Development District zoning
designation, which allows one wall sign not to exceed six square feet for each building. This will be utilized
to note the main residential entrance.
ACCESSORY RETAIL
Accessory retail signs are proposed above storefronts as wall mounted signs or flag signs resembling those
found throughout the 50th & France district. The current PCD-2 zoning designation provides for 15% of
wall area, one per building, or 80 SF max of signage. This development anticipates multiple retailers of
varying sizes. The development team is requesting the PUD accommodate one sign per storefront
configured as no more than 100 SF for the first sign and 50 SF for each additional sign.
This language is consistent with PCD-3 zoning designation and would allow for successful “four-sided”
retail storefront. Lighting for each sign is intended to be through illumination from the adjacent walls or
through internal illumination.
INTRA-AREA DIRECTORIES
The development plans reflect three monument signs that would
benefit the entire district. The existing conditions provide
monument signs at the south entrance of the center ramp. Based on
the emphasis of pedestrian experience, our plan anticipates utilizing
similar signage throughout the project. As is the case for mixed
development districts, the proposed project anticipates one
directory per major entry from a public street.
PUBLICLY OWNED FACILITIES
There are currently three parking signs (two wall mounted flags and
one monument) installed on the proposed development land. The
proposed project anticipates re-installing/replacing these to
accommodate the new parking structure wayfinding. These will
continue to carry forward the same architectural language and size.
TEMPORARY SIGNAGE
The developer is requesting a temporary signage variance from the city to accommodate existing
businesses in the block between 50th and 49.5 Street during construction. Given the re-routing of
pedestrian traffic at various points during the construction cycle the developer is requesting the ability to
create banner signs along fencing that would encompass the site. This would be for the benefit of the
existing retailers and provide any exterior façade renderings.
Lighting
The development will provide site lighting through a mix of building mounted fixtures,
overhead decorative lighting and parking lot lighting throughout all ramps. Building mounted
lighting will include decorative wall-mounted sconces located at tenant entrances as well as
cornices and architectural features found on the building.
Overhead decorative lighting will illuminate walkways as well as extend over 49 ½ Street,
serving as a secondary light source (code compliance coming from other fixtures) that will
enhance the vibrancy and charm of the district. This lighting will be provided through the use
of café lights affixed to metal cables, as is found in other areas of the district.
10 | P a g e
Parking lot lighting will be provided through the use of motion sensor
LED lights, similar to the way existing ramps are illuminated. The
developer intends on re-using as many of the existing fixtures as
possible and will supplement with new fixtures as needed. In response
to neighborhood discussions north of the Property the development
team has determined that code compliance illumination will be
obtained on the Northern Ramp by installing lower poles to limit glare.
This will require more lights than are currently in operation, but will
help in limiting impact to the neighbors north of the ramp.
Landscaping Plan
The development provides for substantial landscaping and streetscape improvements
throughout the project area. We have strived to integrate sustainable design principles into
our landscape design. This practice includes utilizing diverse plant species, disease and
drought resistant native and naturalized plant material, along with the reduction of
stormwater run-off through the use of a water efficient irrigation and reduced impervious
surface.
The property is currently comprised of predominantly impervious parking surface, with
planting beds found throughout the central portion of the property. The current walkways
are constructed of paver material, bordered by concrete. We have submitted a plan that
maximizes the pedestrian experience through the implementation of
extensive planting beds and extended paver and stamped concrete
walkways.
Due to the limited size of the site and the developers desire to introduce
additional plant material to the district, the project also utilizes green wall
applications in multiple areas. These green walls are found predominantly
along the southern wall of the north parking ramp. The development team
envisions installing a lattice system across sections of the existing and new
structure to accommodate vertical plant growth. This system is similar to
what has been installed in other areas of the Twin Cities. The lattice system
along the North façade, will be made of an aesthetically appealing
punched metal pattern which will serve as a beautification from the
existing conditions in all seasons.
Improvements to the north side of the northern parking structure will also
include tree preservation of 30-40’ overstory trees, cleaning up undergrowth and installation of shade
tolerant plant material. Planting areas will be mulched with a double shredded hardwood bark. Sodded
areas will receive soil conditioning prior to sod that loosens the dirt ensuring for water infiltration.
11 | P a g e
Plaza
One of the most unique aspects of this project is how it emphasizes the public experience. The
development team met with multiple stakeholders and residents to determine the best approach toward
activating public realm.
The current plan provides approximately 34,000 SF of public plazas and walkways. These areas have been
planned to accommodate the expansion of our cultural events, such as Edina Art Fair, 4th of July Parade,
Tree Lighting Ceremony, PumpkinFest, and other events. The current design creates a natural
amphitheater that works with existing grade changes. This allows for plentiful public seating and lends
itself to a variety of uses. The plaza will be equipped with a water feature and have appropriate power for
events that aren’t currently offered at 50th & France.
The development team envisions this space accommodating a Winter Holiday Market, Movie in the Park,
Farmers Market and others. Similar to the way current cultural events are planned at 50th & France, added
activity is anticipated to be managed through the 50th & France Business Association. This ensures that
retailers aren’t negatively impacted by road closures and creates some cohesiveness across program
communication. In connection with these efforts the developer is also committed to facilitating
association membership by tenants and the apartment management company.
Public Art
The project provides six rotating art walls and four rotating sculpture
locations. These locations will be permanent fixtures within the project
and are intended to be activated through the Arts and Culture
Commission of Edina. These additional locations represent an
approximate 40% increase in the art locations throughout the city.
As part of that process, each of the new base and canvas would be subject
to a call for public art in January. This is typically managed through the Edina Art Center and Public Art
Edina. Selections would be made in March, similar to the way they currently are managed, and
installments would happen in May.
The development team has proposed that they would fund 10 years of artist stipends for each of these
locations. While it is the development team’s vision that one canvas would be reserved for community
created art, done through the Edina School system, the decision and implementation of this would be in
the hands of the Arts and Culture Commission.
12 | P a g e
Sustainability
Sustainability is an important element of projects of this scale. The development team has analyzed how
to best implement sustainable design while balancing long term payback. Through this evaluation, there
are three areas of focus: Design, Transportation, and Materials.
DESIGN
The project is designed to maximize access to natural lighting, providing the use of passive solar design
that reduces energy costs. This has been accomplished through the placement of windows, awnings and
balconies. It will be coupled with strategic orientation of oversized walkways and public plazas expand
greenspace within the district. By introducing these elements to the
project, the development reduces the overall impervious surface by
10%, which assists in limiting impacts to the watershed and surrounding
properties. Greenspace has been extended both vertically and
horizontally throughout the project with the use of green walls for
parking screening and rooftop gardens for further reduction in runoff.
Added green space will aid in improvements to air quality and
aesthetics.
TRANSPORTATION
The building emphasizes multi-modal transportation with the public plaza areas accommodating bicycle,
pedestrian and vehicle traffic. To ensure the project is long lasting and reflective of the ways
transportation is changing, the project has been built so that parking additions to the north of 49 ½ Street
could be converted to office uses. Parking facilities will be equipped with electric vehicle charging stations.
Perhaps most notably, the project limits materials headed to the landfill, by reusing and expanding the
north parking structure. The project design took into account how it can be a catalyst for reduced vehicle
use by emphasizing walkability and extending wayfinding to bus locations. With two major bus lines
located less than a block from the site, the redesigned pedestrian ways will allow for ease of use and aim
to reduce the number of vehicle trips.
MATERIALS & PRODUCT SELECTION
The project will re-use existing ramp LED fixtures and supplement with similar fixtures for all additions.
The exterior materials are comprised of brick, stone, stucco finish, glass and steel. These materials were
selected based on the timeless character and as a way of limiting the use of materials that require ongoing
maintenance. Programmable thermostats in units, occupancy sensors in the parking ramps and common
areas, and high efficiency plumbing fixtures will be used throughout the development. With over 1,000
apartment units under management, the development team has experienced up to 30% reductions in
water where sub-metering was introduced. This practice will be accommodated across both the
residential and retail portions of the development. To further drive down the building impact, common
areas will accommodate a mix of waterless and low flow fixtures.
PROJECT USES
Retail
Throughout this process the development team has received many questions about the types of retail
that would be drawn to the area. This project, while transformational considering existing conditions, only
delivers an additional 4% of retail space to the district. It is anticipated that the total rentable area will be
13 | P a g e
divided into six to nine suites ranging in size from 2,000 SF to 9,000 SF. Early in the RFP process the
development team engaged CBRE to assist in designing the spaces. This resulted in the configurations you
see today, which take advantage of walkways navigating through the district and improve street life by
extending patios throughout.
While no retailers have been identified, the development team
anticipates the following concepts will fill in the space:
- 6,000 – 10,000 SF: anchor tenant or shared workplace
- 8,000 – 10,000 SF: Two restaurants comprising approximately
5,000 SF, possibly in the following categories
o Seafood
o Jazz
o Chef Driven
- 10,000 – 13,000 SF: boutiques, possibly comprised as follows
o 2,000 SF coffee shop
o 5,000 SF home goods/lifestyle/fashion
o 3,000 SF boutique
The demographics of this area and the unique suite sizes will drive
retailer traffic. Based on our market evaluation the proposed retail
footprint is very leasable.
Housing
The project delivers 110 apartment units into the core of 50th & France.
This was reduced from the 131 units that was reflected in the RFP response and represents approximately
37 units/acre. The new apartment units are larger than a typical new construction urban project.
Averaging over 1,180 square feet, the new apartments will provide a housing option that does not exist
near the 50th and France business district.
The apartments will be designed with condo-quality finishes and open efficient floorplans. They will range
in size including 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom, 2 bedroom plus den, and 3 bedroom apartments. We believe
that these larger units will be attractive to homeowners in the area that desire walkability and amenities
of 50th & France but would like the maintenance-free lifestyle that comes with renting. Finishes in the
apartments will include wood floors, tile bathrooms, quartz countertops, upgraded appliances, and 10’
ceilings. The building has been designed so that each apartment has access to outdoor space as well as
large window openings to provide natural lighting.
Through public engagement during the sketch plan process and various smaller focus groups it has
become clear that common gathering areas are critical
for residents. Many of the housing options throughout
the area do not provide public gathering space or have a
single large club room. The project has been designed to
ensure there are a multitude of options for community
gathering with locations on the 6th, 2nd and 1st floors.
Careful consideration was put toward the location of
these amenities to ensure that they did not overtake the
public realm and instead complimented those spaces
with resident activity.
14 | P a g e
Our proposal includes 10% affordable apartments that will be restricted to 60% of area median income.
SOUTHDALE AREA DESIGN PRINCIPLES
This project provides a unique opportunity to extend the attractive elements of 50th & France into 49 ½
Street. In doing so, this portion of Edina’s downtown can be transformed from a supporting role into a
complimentary component of the district that builds a retail synergy with existing uses, improves
pedestrian experience and access to the core of 50th and France and brings new residents to the district.
The same core principles that have made 50th & France successful are infused into this development and
the testing ground for the design elements has been whether they stand up to Southdale Area Design
Principles. In fact, it’s these elements that look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site and
allow this project to operate as a mutually supportive infrastructure that can sustain the entire district.
DISTRICT FUNCTION
The project improves the walkway system that exists at 50th & France by extending widened walkways
throughout the district and incorporating the charming intrigue that comes with a pedestrian focused
experience. The walkways were designed to carry forward the architectural language and scale found
throughout the 50th & France district, opening to gathering areas and art. By introducing a central walkway
that extends from the north to the south, pedestrian wayfinding throughout the entire district is poised
to improve. Centralizing parking and expanding capacity will benefit existing retailers and allow visitors to
find parking more readily.
PLAN & PROCESS
The project explored many options throughout the RFP process. It started with an evaluation of the Edina
Realty site alone whereby we would deliver ground level retail with parking above. After consulting with
CBRE we determined that this would not provide for sustainable retail development since it stood as an
island apart from all other retail. It also didn’t allow for very efficient parking since parking ramp elevations
were inconsistent with retailer deck-to-deck preferences. As a result we determined it was best to extend
a ramp over the existing northern parking structure and connect to a western extension on the Hooten
site. In doing so, we were able to deliver additional parking to the district, but 49 ½ Street was still
challenged by a lack of pedestrian traffic. This moved our design across the street to see if we could simply
modify the central parking structure to allow for additional retail. During this process it became clear that
the 1975 vintage parking structure could not be upgraded for code compliance without substantial costly
repairs. By uncovering these facts early in the process, the development team was able to start with a
clean slate and think about how the central portion of 50th & France could provide a pedestrian
infrastructure for the entire district. While these aren’t new elements to the area, they provide
comprehensive connections that aren’t currently in place.
COMPREHENSIVE CONNECTIONS
The central heartbeat of the project is the plaza with the wernoof providing connections through and out
of the projection. By doing this, the development allows for pedestrian flow to public transportation and
bicycle parking. This project is located two blocks from a primary or secondary bicycle thoroughfare (noted
in the 2008 comprehensive plan). By extending the walkway systems through the site and accommodating
district wide bicycle parking, the project allows residents, visitors and retailers an opportunity to make
healthy transportation decisions. Widened, well defined, sidewalks and crosswalks introduce safer travel
along 49 ½ Street.
15 | P a g e
SITE DESIGN & TRANSITIONS
The project has been designed as a six-story structure. While this is two-stories above the existing zoning
designation, the design team went to great lengths to determine how the project fit into the
neighborhood, acknowledging that all of the uses within the central development (retail and residential)
are complimentary to the surrounding retail district.
The design evaluated views from all areas of the district to determine a height that would fit contextually
with the existing district. This can be seen in the following graphic.
By positioning density in the center (southern) portion of the property, the impact of shadows is confined
to the northern public parking structure and its ground level retail. After completing sketch plan review
and evaluating the streetscape from a pedestrian view it became apparent modulating height on the far
western edge of the residential would make for a more inviting development. The current design
accommodates an endcap that reduces façade height, incorporates a 2nd level step back and purposefully
includes multiple balconies. These efforts were made to soften the approach to the property. By carrying
the retail façade and building detail vertically on the north, the pedestrian experience provides a more
measured building articulation. Based on a 3D elevation view along 49th Street, the project is shielded
from residents to the north of the project.
View from 49th Street with new building addition
16 | P a g e
Element Working Principle
Health Advance human and environmental health as the public and private
realms evolve.
a. Health and wellness is promoted by the creation of a live, work, shop
environment that emphasizes multi-modal transportation.
b. Parking structures are equipped with bicycle parking locations and
electric vehicle charging stations.
c. Extended walkway system makes accessing public transportation
easier and more logical with improved wayfinding.
d. Improved safety for pedestrians and vehicles with better defined
walkways/crosswalks and reduced curb cuts.
Cultural Preferences Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and
publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity and enhanced
economic vibrancy.
a. The proposed development is a multi-use and multi-access
development. The design is intended to maximize the pedestrian
experience while improving parking accessibility. This is achieved by
extending widened walkways through and surrounding the
development.
b. The buildings incorporate public art throughout. These features are
aimed at enhancing community interaction, bringing human scale to
streetscape and extending Edina’s rich art culture into building
facades. This is done through the use of six rotating canvas’ found on
along the northern parking structure and four rotating sculpture
locations throughout the overall development.
c. The project façade has been broken up into multiple buildings to allow
for the feeling of an organic assembly of structures. This also allowed
for the implementation of many timeless designs found throughout
the district and other successful plazas found throughout the US and
Europe.
d. Extending walkways with city easements allows for a naming
convention that emphasizes the benefits for retailers locating with
doors facing the pedestrian walkway system. This is not currently in
place, and doing so will enhance the economic vibrancy for all retailers
located along the walkway system.
e. The plaza has been sized to allow for multi-generational gatherings.
The plaza is purposefully flexible in uses. The development team drew
on the programming that occurs at places like Lake Harriett Band shell
(Minneapolis), Klyde Warren Park (Dallas), and others to ensure this is
a space that will be cherished by the community for decades to come.
Innovation Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated
problems.
a. The design implements flexibility for loading and unloading with
multiple locations that result in ease of use for multiple parties.
17 | P a g e
b. The northern parking structure has been designed to allow for
conversion to other uses should driverless cars reduce the need for
vehicle parking in the future.
c. The plaza has been configured and equipped with multiple uses in
mind, eliminating the permanent ice rink that would have precluded
Holiday Markets, Tree Lighting or other cultural events that would
benefit from added space.
d. Re-use and expansion of existing north ramp reduces cost & waste
while achieving the objectives set forth by the 2011 parking study and
as expressed in the City’s RFP.
Land Use; Live-able Promote well-balanced aggregations of “come to” and “stay at” places
focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm.
a. The project extends a central pedestrian walkway through the
development to promote pedestrian flow through the entire 50th &
France business district.
b. Widened sidewalks, reduced curb cuts and better defined cross walks
promote human activity along 49 ½ Street and through the central
plaza.
c. Central plaza is equipped with a water feature, permanent and
temporary seating that creates a “landing pad” for visitors and
residents. The activation of these areas with programming creates
year-round interest that leverages current cultural events.
Economic Vitality Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality
of the district and the community.
a. The project incorporated the feedback from retail experts throughout
the initial design and all subsequent renditions. This resulted in “four-
sided” architecture and careful selection of grades.
b. The retail for the project has been configured so that it promotes
diverse retailer expansion, from a small boutique or coffee shop, to a
larger restaurant or home goods store.
c. Representing only a 4% increase in the retail stock, this project can
provide a beneficial supplement to existing retailers. By adding public
plazas and extending walkways, the proposed project emphasizes
what has made 50th & France a desirable retail node.
MAINTENANCE
The project will contribute to the 50th & France business district operating and management funds. In
connection with improvements to the north parking structure the developer will commit to maintaining
landscaping for a period of two years. Any additional maintenance is anticipated to be the duty of the 50th
& France business association.
TIMING AND PHASING
Project construction is expected to start in fall/winter 2017, pending city approvals. The project is
anticipated to be completed in two phases. The north parking structure and the central structure.
The Project Schedule has been carefully planned and coordinated to reduce construction impact on
residents and businesses. The proposed schedule results in no parking deficits during the important
Holiday Peaks, based on 2016 parking numbers and SRF's traffic studies.
18 | P a g e
The South project will include t he demolition of the center ramp and construction of new underground
parking, retail and housing and is expected to take approximately 17 months to complete
The North project adds parking stalls to each side and the top of the “North” parking ramp as well as
ground floor retail. Construction is expected to take approximately 9 months to complete.
Please see the Construction Phasing section of the attachments for a detailed description of the project
phasing. The schedule is a result of detailed thoughtful analysis on how best to minimize impacts on business.
PUBLIC BENEFIT
This project serves as a catalyst for increased tax base, expanded housing diversity and additional cultural
gatherings in Edina’s downtown. The proposed project would help achieve the goals and objectives as
stated within the city’s request for proposals.
Project Deviations
The Edina Collaborative, as currently proposed, will require site flexibility as allowed by the city ordinance:
Buhl Investors and Saturday Properties believe these requests are consistent with the RFP submittal and
take into consideration feedback received from a variety of stakeholders.
North
Building 1
Center
Building 2
0.18 3.07
54'
(+6' for the
elevator/stair core)
6 stories
(+2 story deviation)
Front: No deviation
needed, matching
existing setback
Front: No deviation
needed, improving
adjacent/existing setbacks.
Existing: 6.3' - 10', 8.2' avg
Proposed Ground Floor:
8' - 21', 14.7' avg
Proposed Upper Levels:
8' - 31', 18.7' avg
n/a n/a
Rear: Match
existing 13-16'
ramp structure
setback
Rear: Varies (17'-42'),
treated as another front
setback for dual frontage
buildings; does match and
improve upon adjacent
setbacks
1.73 overall 1.5Maximum FAR
(Sec. 36-617(a))
PUD DeviationZoning District PDC-2 (Planned Commercial District)
Required Setbacks
(Sec. 36-617(b))
Side: not applicable
Rear: 25' or building height
39.5Housing Density 30 units per acre
Maximum Height
(Sec. 36-617(c))4 stories or 48 feet
Front: to match adjacent setbacks
Side: not applicable
Rear: 25 feet or building height
The Proposed Construction Schedule is outlined in detail in the "Construction Phasing" section of this
documents attachments. The Phasing outlined illustrates each major time period of construction, the impact
on parking numbers and the anticipated construction barriers and walkways to provide access to existing
businesses.
Pending City Approvals, construction would begin this Fall with Xcel Energy and Utility upgrades. After the 2017
Holiday Shopping Season, Construction would begin in January on the North Mixed-Use project. In April the
vertical expansion of the North ramp is anticipated to be completed and the South Mixed-Use project would
begin. The complete North project would be Open September 2018 with the remainder of the project
completed by August 2019.
19 | P a g e
Project Benefits
Market Street Edina LLC submits that the following “public benefits” far outweigh the requested
deviations. The Collaborative Edina creates the flexibility required to meet today’s market demand,
generating the following benefits:
IMPROVED SAFETY
Reduced curb cuts along 49 ½ Street and better defined crosswalks will improve safety for both cars and
pedestrians. By positioning the entrances to ramps across from each other and consolidating the majority
of parking in the north ramp, traffic impacts are mitigated.
EXPANDED COMMERCE
By coupling additional retail space with attractive public areas that offer a unique pedestrian experience,
the project is poised to accommodate extended shopping hours. Customers will stay in the business
district longer which will allow for additional sales. This project provides a parking surplus that can be
used to accommodate future retail expansion.
DIVERSE AND IMPROVED HOUSING
The project delivers 110 apartment units to the district. There is currently very little for-rent housing stock
in this walkable area. By providing additional options for those who want to downsize from larger homes
and take advantage of proximity to multiple amenities this project facilitates a recycling of housing stock.
It also delivers 11 units of affordable housing, demonstrating the city commitment to mixed income
housing stock.
INCREASED TAX BASE
Adding walkable amenities to the area assists in driving residential demand and values. The current
proposal adds approximately 34,000 SF of public area that will appeal to surrounding residents. By
completing this project, the tax base is anticipated to increase from $0 to approximately $950,000 per
year.
NEW PUBLIC PARKING FACILITIES
This property delivers new public parking structures without requiring taxes from adjacent parcels or
assessing current 50th & France businesses. The proposed plan provides 439 stalls, of which 128 stalls will
be underground tempered parking. Not only does this provide diverse parking options for difficult
weather days, it takes non-handicap accessible stalls and makes stalls available to all visitors.
Our Team is interested in developing the site and getting spaces filled with new tenants that will become
valuable business members of the community. The proposed plan mitigates impacts to the neighbors,
expands public amenities and is positioned to capture existing retailer demand. We look forward to
working together to add value to the City of Edina.
SKETCH PLAN RESPONSE
Element Sketch Plan PUD Submittal
Separate building façade The building looks a bit
too monolithic, it
would be preferred to
see more façade
articulation.
The current plan is reduced into six distinct building forms to
reduce scale and blend into the district. The architectural
language is pulled down to grade to ensure that the
pedestrian shopping experience is consistent across the
district and carries forward neighborhood charm.
20 | P a g e
Element Sketch Plan PUD Submittal
Bicycle Parking and Access How are you
accommodating bike
parking and
circulation?
The project responds to these comments by introducing a
bike fix-it station along the western property line, accessible
to the public. Additionally, the development will install up to
175 bicycle parking spots spread throughout the property.
These elements, when coupled with the expanded walkway
system, allow for better access to the primary bike routes
found on France Avenue and public transportation.
Construction Impact Where will workers
park during
construction?
The development team is in discussions to rent existing
parking lots in the surrounding 3 mile radius. These locations
will provide parking during construction and be serviced by a
shuttle service paid for by the development. The
development team anticipates that during certain times in
the construction schedule off-duty police will be hired to
help manage traffic. Subject to continued retailer and city
communication, retailer drop off and delivery during
construction is anticipated to occur along both 49 1/2 Street
and the two existing curb cuts on 50th Street. The 50th &
France Business Association will be included in all emails and
invited in as part of the construction task force that will have
access to construction scheduling on a bi-monthly basis.
Green Wall Application Please elaborate on the
plant material you
anticipate will grow on
this wall and how will it
be maintained.
The development team worked with the neighbors to
evaluate plant material and façade treatments along the
north parking wall. Through this process it was determined
that a combination of decorative metal screening,
upright yews and cleaning of
underbrush was most sustainable. The metal screening
provides beautification from existing cinder blocks and
louvers. Maintaining and preserving the 30-40' overstory
trees ensures that existing screening remains and cleaning
undergrowth will provide further beautification.
upright yews and cleaning of underbrush was most
sustainable. The metal screening provides beautification
from existing cinder blocks and louvers. Maintaining and
preserving the 30-40' overstory trees ensures that existing
screening remains and cleaning undergrowth will provide
further beautification.
21 | P a g e
Signage vs Public Art How can we ensure
that the public art
shown on the plan
does not become
billboards?
The development team met with the Edina Art Center and
talked through the process for public art. It is anticipated
that since these components of the building will be public,
the easements governing the use will be reflective of
perpetual art installments.
Element Sketch Plan PUD Submittal
Modulate Height We are not opposed to
height but I'm not sure
6 stories across the
entire site is
appropriate. Podium
height articulation
would be beneficial.
The building façade has been modified to incorporate a 6-10'
setback surrounding the exterior façade at the 2nd floor. It is
further articulated with a combination of projecting and
inset balconies along with multiple building step backs.
Through an evaluation of building heights, the project
modified sections of the buildings to be three, four, five and
six stories in height (includes northern parking parcels). The
current plan balances height and the revenue that comes
with the cost of creating public improvements. The project
would not be able to provide as much public amenities if the
height were not modulated as it currently is since the
property is contributing to the expenses of the public
infrastructure.
Green Design Elements What type of green
elements have you
introduced?
Sustainable considerations that are included in project
design are: (1) 175 bike parking stalls, (2) electric vehicle
charging stations, (3) selection of sustainable building
materials, (4) inclusion of energy efficient mechanical and
water efficient plumbing, (5) submetering of all fixtures with
occupancy sensors to reduce energy footprint, (6) LED
lighting, (7) native drought tolerant landscaping and
reduction in impervious area
Mechanical Units We've had issues with
the location of
mechanical units and
noise. What measures
are being taken to
make sure this
development doesn’t
result in further
complaints?
This design includes self-contained heating and cooling units
for the apartments which minimizes the mechanical
equipment on the roof. Elevator over runs and stair towers
were strategically positioned within the center corridors to
minimize any façade impact
Mechanical units will be located in order to minimize
impacts on surrounding residents. Units will be screened
according to city standards and efforts will be made to
locate any units in such a way that reduces any potential
noise pollution.
22 | P a g e
Explore Management of
public space
It would be useful to
have additional detail
around green wall
maintenance.
The development team has had four meetings with the 50th
& France Business Association and anticipates that as part of
its involvement with the organization the cost of maintaining
public right of way will be reduced for other participants.
Light Study It appears that the
buildling will cast a
shadow on the
northern buildings, can
you please comment
on how this will be
managed?
A light study was completed and the residential building
casts shadows on the northern parking structure. The
development team thought this was the most desirable
based on th limited impact to residences along 49th Street.
As an additional measure to increase light penetration, the
five-story glass walkway adjacent to the plaza was reduced
to a single decorative skyway
23 | Page
COMMUNITY OUTREACH
24 | Page
SUMMARY
25 | Page
PHOTOS OF INITIAL PUBLIC MEETINGS
THE COLLABORATIVE HOSTED NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS ON JANUARY 9 & 10 AT MOZZA MIA TO SHARE PROJECT
INFORMATION AND FIELD QUESTIONS FROM NEARBY RESIDENTS. THE NOTIFICATION FOR THESE WENT TO RESIDENTS &
OWNERS WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF THE PROJECT. BUHL/SATURDAY HAND DELIVERED FLIERS TO TENANTS TO ENSURE THEY
WERE NOTIFIED. WHILE NOT A REQUIREMENT BY ORDINANCE, IT WAS OUR WAY OF BEING COLLABORATIVE.
ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WILL OCCUR IN CONNECTION WITH THE REZONING SUBMITTAL PER CITY ORDINANCE.
26 | Page
WEBSITE
IN JANUARY, WE LAUNCHED THE WEBSITE EDINACOLLABORATIVE.COM WITH THE GOAL OF PROVIDING A LANDING PAGE FOR
PEOPLE INTERESTED IN THE PROJECT TO LEARN MORE, SUBMIT FEEDBACK AND SIGN UP FOR REGULAR EMAIL UPDATES.
THE WEBSITE LINK WAS PROVIDED AT EACH COMMUNITY GATHERING AND WITHIN THE STAR TRIBUNE ONLINE ARTICLE.
EMAIL OUTREACH
EVERY 1‐2 WEEKS, THE COLLABORATIVE SENDS EMAIL NEWSLETTERS TO ITS MAILING LIST WHICH INCLUDE STATUS UPDATES
AND REGULARLY FEATURE QUESTIONS AND FEEDBACK FROM THE COMMUNITY.
Developer Outreach Publication Date
Project Website is live Website 12/20/2016
Mail notification to owners in 1,000 ft of project Mailer 12/21/2016
Email Update #1 ‐ Intro Email 1/17/2017
Email Update #2 ‐ Plaza Activation Email 1/28/2017
Email Update #3 ‐ Public comment Email 2/6/2017
Email Update #4 Public Places Email 2/15/2017
Email Update #5 Outreach Infographic Email 3/6/2017
27 | Page
3RD PARTY PUBLICATION
THE PROJECT HAS GARNERED SIGNIFICANT ATTENTION SINCE IT WENT PUBLIC IN FALL 2016. BELOW IS A LIST OF PUBLISHED
SOURCES INDUCING TRADITIONAL NEWS MEDIA, THE CITY OF EDINA (SOCIAL MEDIA, EMAIL AND PUBLIC FORUMS) AS WELL AS
NEXTDOOR AND SPEAK UP! EDINA CONVERSATION.
3rd Party Publication Publication Date
Request for Proposals is public Edina Website 8/17/2016
Edina Seeks Developer Finance & Commerce 8/18/2016
Request for Proposal Q&A updated Edina Website 9/21/2016
Edina Selects Developer Finance & Commerce 12/21/2016
Proposal to Add Parking Minneapolis Business Journal 12/21/2016
Next Door Publication Next Door 12/22/2016
Daily Digest Featured Post Email Next Door 12/22/2016
Daily Digest Featured Post Email Next Door 12/23/2016
Daily Digest Featured Post Email Next Door 12/24/2016
Friday Report Noting Developer Conversation City of Edina 12/23/2016
Email Notification (top Story) Finance & Commerce email list se 12/24/2016
Proposal for Parking Star Tribune Online 12/29/2016
Edina Downtown Makover Star Tribune Regional front page 12/20/2016
Plaza Article (63 likes) Star Tribune Facebook 12/29/2016
Scott Neal Retweeted Strib article Twitter 12/29/2016
Next Door Publication ‐ repost of Strib Article Next Door 12/29/2016
Daily Digest Featured Post Email Next Door 12/30/2017
Daily Digest Featured Post Email Next Door 1/2/2017
Daily Digest Featured Post Email Next Door 1/4/2017
Scott Neal Friday Report Email Email 1/6/2017
Daily Digest Featured Post Email Next Door 1/7/2017
Developers in their home court article Finance & Commerce 1/12/2017
Scott Neal Friday Report Email City of Edina 1/13/2017
Speak up Edina is posted City of Edina 1/14/2017
Edina TV video Facebook ‐ City of Edina 1/13/2017
Channel 5 publication KSTP 1/17/2017
Scott Neal Notification of Evening Council Meeting Twitter 1/18/2017
City Council Public Re‐run (15 times between Jan 21 to Feb 5) Public Television 2/5/2017
Planning Commission Re‐run (10 times between Jan 12 to Jan 21) Public Television 1/21/2017
Agenda: Edina Video (54 times between Jan 15 to Feb 1) Public Television 2/1/2017
Friday Report Noting Developer Conversation City of Edina 1/27/2017
Speak up Edina Next Door post Next Door 2/2/2017
Thursday Press release City of Edina 2/2/2017
City of Edina tweets about 49.5 Street Twitter 2/3/2017
Scott Neal Friday Report Email ‐ 49.5 name change City of Edina 2/4/2017
Next door City of Edina Publication Next Door 2/15/2017
State of the community (hoveland at Chamber) Edina Website 2/22/2017
Speak up Edina Project Post Closes Edina Website 3/3/2017
Scott Neal Friday Report Email City of Edina 3/3/2017
28 | Page
DEVELOPER ONE‐ON‐ONE MEETINGS
SIGNIFICANT ATTENTION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO MAJOR STAKEHOLDERS FOR THIS IMPORTANT PROJECT IN ORDER TO
APPROPRIATELY LISTEN AND RESPOND. TO DATE, THE COLLABORATIVE TEAM HAS MET WITH MORE THAN 140 RESIDENTS,
50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS OWNERS, AND OTHERS.
Developer Meetings/Presentations Venue Date
Meeting with 50th & France Landlord 0 Corporate Office 12/1/2017
HRA Meeting Presentations City Hall
Meeting with Competing Bidders Pinehurst Building & EGO Holding 12/16/2016
HRA and City Council Resolution Public Meeting City Hall 12/20/2016
Hand delivered notifications to businesses Mailer 12/28/2016
Meeting with owner of mulitiple 49th Street homes in Person 12/29/2016
Meeting with neighbor on Maple in Person 1/3/2017
Meeting with renter on 49th Street in Person 1/3/2017
Meeting with resident on 49th Street in Person 1/4/2017
Meeting with morningside resident in Person 1/4/2017
50th & France Board Meeting 50th & France 1/4/2017
Meeting with business owner of 50th & France A in Person 1/6/2017
Neighborhood Meeting Mozza Mia 1/9/2017
Meeting with business manager of adjacent tenant B in Person 1/9/2017
Meeting Edina 5.0 tenant C in Person 1/9/2017
Neighborhood Meeting Mozza Mia 1/10/2017
Sketch Plan Planning Commission Meeting City Hall 1/11/2017
50th & France Business Association Meeting 50th & France 1/12/2017
Meeting state representative in Person 1/13/2017
Meeting Country Club resident in Person 1/13/2017
Meeting Arden Park resident in Person 1/13/2017
Meeting with long time Edina Business owner D in Person 1/16/2017
Meeting with Cornelia neighborhood resident in Person 1/16/2017
Meeting with owner of multiple 50th & France buildings E in Person 1/19/2017
Email outreach to adjacent building owner F Email 1/17/2017
Meeting with 50th & France business manager G in Person 1/17/2017
Sketch Plan City Council Meeting City Hall 1/18/2017
Meeting minneapolis business owner in Person 1/19/2017
Meeting with owner of multiple 50th & France buildings E in Person 1/24/2016
Outreach 50th business owner H Call 1/25/2017
Email dialogue with multiple 50th & France buildings E Email 1/27/20107
Meeting with 50th & France Business owner I in Person 1/30/2017
Impromptu Meeting ‐ 50th & France business owners and landlords in Person 1/30/2017
Meeting with 5000 France resident in Person 2/3/2017
Meeting with 5000 France resident #2 in Person 2/10/2017
Meeting with Edina Art Representatives in Person 2/10/2017
HRA Update Meeting City Hall 2/22/2017
Neighborhood Meeting with 49th Residents in Person 2/1/2017
Meeting with 50th & France Business owner J City Hall 2/17/2017
Meeting with adjacent property owner K in Person 2/16/2017
Meeting with Tenant and landlord L in Person 2/22/2017
Meeting with 50th & France business owner M in Person 2/23/2017
Meeting with 50th & France Business Member and Mpls Owner N in Person 2/28/2017
Meeting with 50th and France Board in Person 3/1/2017
Meeting with resident on 49th Street in Person 3/14/2017
Meeting with 50th & France Business owner J in Person 3/2/2017
Meeting with 50th & France Landlord 0 in Person 3/6/2017
Meeting with 50th & France General Members in Person 3/8/2017
29 | Page
COMMUNITY LETTERS
BELOW IS A SAMPLING OF LETTERS OF SUPPORT FOR THE PROJECT FROM EDINA NEIGHBORS.
This is an exciting project that fits the fabric of the neighborhood and allows for an improved shopping
experience. It wasn’t long ago that 50th and France was home to Arby’s fast food, Sinclair gas station and
the Brown Derby bar. The project builds on the recent improvements and adds charming space for
additional retail that will compliment my business. – Bryan M. (50th & France business owner)
I’ve known these guys for quite a while. They’ve always displayed excellent character and I firmly believe
they have the city of Edina’s best interest in mind moving forward. They’ve done great things in other
cities and bring a great balance of development skills and deep local roots. I support the project. – Brett
J. (Edina restaurant owner)
My daughter danced at the Tree lighting ceremony this past December. It’s remarkable to see how this
project can improve cultural experiences like those by creating better spaces to gather. I love the
architecture and underground parking. With such a family friendly space I envision frequently coming to
new plaza and shops in all seasons – Kate K. (Edina resident)
I lived in the apartments behind the north parking lot for a number of years. This plan is exactly what I
would have wanted to see ‐ keeping the parking on the north helps to maintain the quiet backyard while
creating charming and appropriately scaled development to the South of 49 ½ Street. I now live south of
50th and France by a few blocks and I look forward to visiting the new extension of 50th! – Kristen O.
(Arden Park resident)
I appreciate that the developers have done extensive outreach so far and have seemed to respect
residents’ opinion. I believe this group is committed to deliver what’s best for the neighborhood and I
feel comfortable that my voice is being heard. Generally, I believe additional parking is beneficial in
sustaining business and I’m fine with the height so long as it is not monolithic. – Judy D. (White oaks
homeowner)
Our family is very excited about this project! We are at 50th and France all the time, but 49 1/2 is
severely underutilized and not a very appealing place right now. A new and active area, more intimate
than the rest of the 50th & France without the traffic on 50th, would really add something to the
neighborhood and be a great amenity for our family. I'd prefer to leave the central plaza flexible in the
winter rather than another ice rink but the kids would love the splash pad! ‐ Dan V. (Creek Knoll resident)
I love the scale and public areas. As a parent of two kids and longtime Edina resident, this fits the
neighborhood well. We live a few blocks away and attend Pumpkin Fest and Edina Art Fair annually. I
like that there’ll be stroller friendly sidewalks, gathering areas for my boys to run around and additional
shops. If the new parking is well lit I don’t see the need to tweak it much, in fact I think having two
parking hubs should help with traffic – Meghan H. (Arden Park resident)
I’ve known each of the developers for many years and trust that they will do what is right for us as
neighbors. Just from the first images it’s clear that the project has focused on maximizing the pedestrian
experience, which I appreciate. I recognize the balance they have to deal with, knowing density allows
for expanded public improvements. I’m excited about the plan. – Nate P. (Golf Terrace resident)
30 | Page
COMMUNITY FEEDBACK
OUR TEAM HAS BEEN CLOSELY TRACKING THE RESPONSE FROM BUSINESS OWNERS AND RESIDENTS ON A NUMBER OF
PLATFORMS, INCLUDING OUR WEBSITE SUBMISSION PAGE, SPEAK UP! EDINA, NEXTDOOR AND IN‐PERSON MEETINGS.
Public Forum Feedback
1) Are there any businesses already interested in the retail space?
2) Will there be more restaurants?
3) Will any of the apartments be rented out like air bnb?
4) Please create a rendering of 6 story building from W 49th St neighborhood
5) I love the central plaza
6) I'm not sure I like the modern prairie architecture
7) Who will be responsible for maintaining the "greenery" on the parking ramp. May look good
for only a short time
8) What plants will be used on side of parking?
9) 6 stories feels too tall
10) It seems like you're adding quite a number of retail spots. I'm concerned that 300 additional
spots is not enough
11) Will there be affordable housing ‐ this seems critical
12) "lighting" issues for residents to north ‐ restrictions? "blocking"?
13) Boutique hotel?
14) What are you doing to provide a buffer to the residents to the north of 49th?
15) Neighborhood traffic issues are a concern
16) Do you think a YMCA satellite office should be put in the retail?
17) We live in an area where bricks and mortar retail is dying. How about a small live theater, a
branch library, arts organizations and other ideas beyond expensive shops
18) Would you be willing to help the folks living on 49th "lobby" the city for traffic control issues?
19) I am concerned about increasing traffic on 50th ‐ esp during "rush hour" in the morning (west
bound) and evening (east bound). I am looking forward to the results of the traffic study.
20) Thank you for taking the time to show us the plans
21) Was a scientific study done on parking needs? If not, your claims on parking needs is
anecdotal
22) Suggestion for the foliage on north side of north ramp ‐ please ensure foliage will survive
facing north ‐ Jan Monson
23) I like the change. We've been residents here for 25 years and this seems to capture the charm
24) too dense , too tall, it looks like a Mall ‐ there will be a loss of old Edina
25) I like the plan and would love to see a bar without kids
26) the planned community gathering space is uninspiring. It looks like something you see at Mall
of America
27) Landscape does not work well with density develop. As a master gardener, I think you need to
be more educated on this issue
31 | Page
NextDoor Feedback
28) Development and enhancement of 50th and France should be just that: enhancement....first
and foremost for residents who live, shop, and dine there every day. When we lose sight of
that priority and develop to a point that our town is less livable for ourselves, then we are on
a misguided path that serves no one.
29) Were residents given opportunities to weigh in before an architectural firm or consultant was
hired to draw the plans? I feel it is inappropriate that major decisions that alter our City ‐ its
character, its livability, its value; which we pay for ‐ should not be made by literally a handful
of residents.
30) The only way to deal with this efficiently is to create one way traffic (two lanes) in a circular
fashion or creating a semi‐circle to get people where they need to go. Ideally the traffic would
turn right to enter the encircling roadway.
31) or better yet is to create more of a circle by eminent domain taking the two homes on the
west side of Ewing and continue with a new street up north on Ewing going slightly northeast
towards AgraCulture and thus 50th. This would create a walkway on France between 51st
street and 50th, again another nice walkway opens up on a now busy stretch of road. This
would be two lane as well with people thus going east on 50th bypassing the busy part of
50th between Halifax and France.
32) Eminent domain for private use is abuse. seizing property to build roads for the sole purpose
of accommodating and encouraging larger private development in an area that is not suitable
to accommodate it without, is a lawsuit waiting to happen. The east side of France is also
Minneapolis, not Edina.
NextDoor: What would make it better?
33) A bubble tea shop
34) More of everything there is along with better parking.
35) Shops that sell affordable items, not just the pricey ones
36) Flower Child Restaurant
37) And no more condos! That area is congested enough already
38) A small farmers market
39) Ask yourself if you'd want to live in this neighborhood given its lack of space for those who
already live and work there. Ask yourself if anyone needs what is offered there already.
40) Trees, lovely flowers, outdoor cafes, ease of walking, and above all clean streets and displays.
Look at downtown Wayzata‐ it looks put together, is warm and has charm. Warmer surfaces.
41) keep the parking garages bright and CLEAN
42) This should never be a TIF district. Under no basis would this qualify for TIF. The excuse the
city used for using TIF in Grandview was to encourage larger development, which is the exact
opposite of what residents want here. Has the city completely lost their mind?? Are they not
listening to the resident concerns at all??
43) Improve the seats in the movie theatre. They are falling apart and tacky.
44) The streets need more greenery and festive strung lights.
45) Make this festive, warm and tasteful.
46) I am also concerned about the continued movement towards building "vertically" in what
should be a more residential‐friendly area.
47) On a personal note, as a business owner for 27 yrs in the 50th/France area, previous
experience with construction in the area results in multiple days of electrical outages and
parking shortages, which translates to lost business for multiple owners
32 | Page
48) I am not against redevelopment as I think it keeps the area "current" and relevant, but does
the redevelopment need to be of this magnitude? And with all the apartment/ condo
construction in Edina currently, is there a need for more condos?
49) Please make outdoor/sidewalk dining a condition for all new restaurants; add as many trees
and greenery as you can possibly fit in, and make everything pet‐friendly.
50) Parking and traffic needs to be addressed
49th Street Neighborhood Meeting Notes
51) Lighting on the addition should be lower level and obscure the source of the light from view
from the neighborhood
52) Long term maintenance of the buffer should be resolved. The existing buffer has not been
maintained and many dead materials are left standing – it feels like forgotten space from the
owner
53) A parking study should be developed to justify the number of parking spaces in the district
and validate the additional spaces that require adding an additional floor to the north ramp
54) Community prefers the ramp be reconstructed and put as much underground as possible
55) Community prefers height of ramp as is
56) Move ramp to Lunds/US Banks parking lot west of the district and north of 50th.
57) Traffic Study should provide recommendations to resolve cut through issues of traffic
avoiding 50th and going through the neighborhood
58) Make sure of architecture of ramp jogs or has some ins and outs to avoid one long monolithic
structure
59) Neighborhood prefers a combination of removing dead underbrush, saving the mature scrub
trees, architectural metal, trellis and vines and evergreen planting
60) Have you considered CEE sound proofing of houses adjacent to new sections of ramp? This
was done when original north ramp was constructed.
61) Neighborhood hears snow plows and car alarms today
62) Please raise grade along north west corner of ramp similar to what was done previously –
potentially allow people’s back yards to (appear) to extend all the way to the ramp similar to
what was done on NW corner previously.
63) Arborvitaes planted on north side of ramp are green on top but have thinned out on the
lower branches. These were planted 15 years ago. Would City periodically replace the
vegetation if it thins out over time?
33
MA
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
O
O
K
I
N
G
W
E
S
T
34
MA
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
O
O
K
I
N
G
S
O
U
T
H
W
E
S
T
35
MA
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
A
R
E
I
A
L
L
O
O
K
I
N
G
S
O
U
T
H
36
37
38
39
40
4 1 |
Pa
g
e
LANDSCAPE APPROACH
SI
T
E
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
EX
T
E
N
D
A
L
L
E
Y
TO
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
NO
R
T
H
/
S
O
U
T
H
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
RO
U
T
E
EX
T
E
N
D
A
L
L
E
Y
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
EA
S
T
/
W
E
S
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
R
O
U
T
E
MA
K
E
C
O
R
N
E
R
A
D
E
S
T
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
SP
A
C
E
W
/
PU
B
L
I
C
A
R
T
O
R
SP
E
C
I
M
E
N
T
R
E
E
MA
K
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
OF
T
H
E
S
I
T
E
A
DE
S
T
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
SP
A
C
E
AD
D
C
E
N
T
E
R
S
P
I
N
E
CR
O
S
S
W
A
L
K
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
W
I
D
T
H
I
S
>
5
’
/
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
R
O
U
T
E
S
F
O
R
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
S
/
M
A
N
Y
P
E
D
/
A
U
T
O
C
O
N
F
L
I
C
T
P
O
I
N
T
S
IN
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
A
N
D
PA
V
I
N
G
P
A
T
T
E
R
N
S
O
F
5
0
T
H
A
V
E
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
A
R
A
G
E
DI
S
R
U
P
T
S
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
CI
R
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
T
O
49
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
IN
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
M ATERIALS
A
N
D
I N C O R P O R A AT E M A AT E R I A L S A N D
EX
T
E
N
D
A
L
L
E
Y
E XT XT
E N D
A L L E Y
T O C O MP
L
E
T
E
T O T O
C O O M P L E T E
NO
R
T
H
/SO
U
T
H
N O RT RT
H /S /S
O U T H
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
P E D E S T R I A N
R O U T E
R O U T E
EX
T
E
N
D
A
L
L
E
Y
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
E XT XT
E N D
A L L E Y
TO TO
C O M P L E T E
EA
S
T
/
W
E
S
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
R
O
U
T
E
E A S A S T /T/
W /W E S T
P E D E S T R I A N
R O U T E
M A K E CO
R N E R
M A K E
C O R N E R
A
D
E
S
T
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
D E S T I N A T AT
I O N
SP
A
C
E
W
/
S PA P A C AC
E
W /W /
PU
B
L
I
C
A
R
T
O
R
P U B L I C
A R T R T O R
SP
E
C
I
M
E
N
T
R
E
E
S P E C I M E N
T R E E
M A K E C E N T E R
M A K E
C E N T E R
OF
T
H
E
S
I
T
E
A
O F
T H E
S I T E
A
DE
S
T
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
D E S T I N AT A T I O N
SP
A
C
E
S PA PA
C AC
E
E X I S T I N G G A R A G E
DI
S
R
U
P
T
S
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
CI
R
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
T
O
49
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
M M A A S S P P S S
4 1 |
Pa
g
e
LANDSCAPE APPROACH
SI
T
E
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
EX
T
E
N
D
A
L
L
E
Y
TO
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
NO
R
T
H
/
S
O
U
T
H
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
RO
U
T
E
EX
T
E
N
D
A
L
L
E
Y
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
EA
S
T
/
W
E
S
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
R
O
U
T
E
MA
K
E
C
O
R
N
E
R
A
D
E
S
T
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
SP
A
C
E
W
/
PU
B
L
I
C
A
R
T
O
R
SP
E
C
I
M
E
N
T
R
E
E
MA
K
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
OF
T
H
E
S
I
T
E
A
DE
S
T
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
SP
A
C
E
AD
D
C
E
N
T
E
R
S
P
I
N
E
CR
O
S
S
W
A
L
K
ST
R
E
E
T
S
C
A
P
E
W
I
D
T
H
I
S
>
5
’
/
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
R
O
U
T
E
S
F
O
R
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
S
/
M
A
N
Y
P
E
D
/
A
U
T
O
C
O
N
F
L
I
C
T
P
O
I
N
T
S
IN
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
A
N
D
PA
V
I
N
G
P
A
T
T
E
R
N
S
O
F
5
0
T
H
A
V
E
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
A
R
A
G
E
DI
S
R
U
P
T
S
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
CI
R
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
T
O
49
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
IN
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
M ATERIALS
A
N
D
I N C O R P O R A AT E M A AT E R I A L S A N D
EX
T
E
N
D
A
L
L
E
Y
E XT XT
E N D
A L L E Y
T O C O MP
L
E
T
E
T O T O
C O O M P L E T E
NO
R
T
H
/SO
U
T
H
N O RT RT
H /S /S
O U T H
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
P E D E S T R I A N
R O U T E
R O U T E
EX
T
E
N
D
A
L
L
E
Y
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
E XT XT
E N D
A L L E Y
TO TO
C O M P L E T E
EA
S
T
/
W
E
S
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
R
O
U
T
E
E A S A S T /T/
W /W E S T
P E D E S T R I A N
R O U T E
M A K E CO
R N E R
M A K E
C O R N E R
A
D
E
S
T
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
D E S T I N A T AT
I O N
SP
A
C
E
W
/
S PA P A C AC
E
W /W /
PU
B
L
I
C
A
R
T
O
R
P U B L I C
A R T R T O R
SP
E
C
I
M
E
N
T
R
E
E
S P E C I M E N
T R E E
M A K E C E N T E R
M A K E
C E N T E R
OF
T
H
E
S
I
T
E
A
O F
T H E
S I T E
A
DE
S
T
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
D E S T I N AT A T I O N
SP
A
C
E
S PA PA
C AC
E
E X I S T I N G G A R A G E
DI
S
R
U
P
T
S
PE
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
CI
R
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
T
O
49
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
M M A A S S P P S S
4 2 |
Pa
g
e
CIRCULATION DIAGRAM
SI
T
E
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
IMPROVED/ADDITIONAL PUBLIC REALMNEW RETAIL ACCESSIBLE ALONG PUBLIC REALM IMPROVED/EXPANDED 49TH & HALIFAX STREETSCAPE
SI
T
E
C
I
R
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
-
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
T
H
E
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E
43
|
Pa
g
e
SI
T
E
I
L
L
U
S
T
R
A
T
I
V
E
LANDSCAPE APPROACHCorner place Central plaza Centrally located between existing and proposed pedes-trian alleys, the plaza will quickly assume the role of a \HDUURXQGGHVWLQDWLRQSXEOLFVSDFH$UH¿QHGSDYLQJpattern will unify the site components, incorporating the quality of materials and detailing of the existing 50th and France design character.Woonerf The dedicated loading area between the proposed EXLOGLQJVZLOOSXWSHGHVWULDQV¿UVWDQGDXWRPRELOHVsecond. This will be accomplished through incorporating many elements of a Woonerf, or a shared street. These HOHPHQWVLQFOXGHYHKLFXODUUDWHGGHFRUDWLYHSDYHUVDQGÀXVKFXUEV5HPRYDEOHEROODUGVDWERWKHQWULHVRIWKHZRRQHUIDOORZWKHDOOH\WREHFORVHGWRYHKLFOHVIRUVSH -FLDOHYHQWVVXFKDVDQDUWIDLUKROLGD\PDUNHWRUIDUP -HU¶VPDUNHW7KLVORFDWLRQLV¿WWLQJIRUDODUJHRYHUKDQJ -LQJSLHFHRISXEOLFDUWWKDWZLOODFWLYDWHWKHVSDFHZLWKDYLEUDQF\RIFRORUDQGFXOWXUH50th and France streetscape extension Alley extensions The alleyways in Edina are an incredibly successful V\VWHPRISHGHVWULDQURXWHVWKDWDUHDFWLYDWHGZLWKDYDULHW\RIUHWDLODQGODQGVFDSHXVHV7KHFXUUHQWDOOH\-ways are important to the 50th and France identity and this proposed design will extend and complete the alley network in the area.Landscape screen 6SHFLDODWWHQWLRQZLOOEHSURYLGHGWRUHVLGHQWVQRUWKof the site whose homes abut the back of the parking VWUXFWXUH$ODQGVFDSHVFUHHQZLOODGGUHVVWKHYHUWLFDO -LW\RIWKHVWUXFWXUHDQGEORFNWKHYLHZVIRUWKHUHVLGHQWVZLWKHYHUJUHHQSODQWPDWHULDOWKDWZLOOSURYLGH\HDUURXQGSULYDF\'HFRUDWLYHZDOOVPD\EHXVHGZKHUHDSSOLFDEOHWRDGGUHVVQRLVHDQGSULYDF\FRQFHUQVIRUWKHUHVLGHQWVExisting 50th and France streetscape123456 7LANDSCAPE DESIGN PRINCIPALS
44
|
Pa
g
e
SI
T
E
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
LANDSCAPE APPROACHCorner place Central plaza Centrally located between existing and proposed pedes-trian alleys, the plaza will quickly assume the role of a \HDUURXQGGHVWLQDWLRQSXEOLFVSDFH$UH¿QHGSDYLQJpattern will unify the site components, incorporating the quality of materials and detailing of the existing 50th and France design character.Woonerf The dedicated loading area between the proposed EXLOGLQJVZLOOSXWSHGHVWULDQV¿UVWDQGDXWRPRELOHVsecond. This will be accomplished through incorporating many elements of a Woonerf, or a shared street. These HOHPHQWVLQFOXGHYHKLFXODUUDWHGGHFRUDWLYHSDYHUVDQGÀXVKFXUEV5HPRYDEOHEROODUGVDWERWKHQWULHVRIWKHZRRQHUIDOORZWKHDOOH\WREHFORVHGWRYHKLFOHVIRUVSH -FLDOHYHQWVVXFKDVDQDUWIDLUKROLGD\PDUNHWRUIDUP -HU¶VPDUNHW7KLVORFDWLRQLV¿WWLQJIRUDODUJHRYHUKDQJ -LQJSLHFHRISXEOLFDUWWKDWZLOODFWLYDWHWKHVSDFHZLWKDYLEUDQF\RIFRORUDQGFXOWXUH50th and France streetscape extension Alley extensions The alleyways in Edina are an incredibly successful V\VWHPRISHGHVWULDQURXWHVWKDWDUHDFWLYDWHGZLWKDYDULHW\RIUHWDLODQGODQGVFDSHXVHV7KHFXUUHQWDOOH\-ways are important to the 50th and France identity and this proposed design will extend and complete the alley network in the area.Landscape screen 6SHFLDODWWHQWLRQZLOOEHSURYLGHGWRUHVLGHQWVQRUWKof the site whose homes abut the back of the parking VWUXFWXUH$ODQGVFDSHVFUHHQZLOODGGUHVVWKHYHUWLFDO -LW\RIWKHVWUXFWXUHDQGEORFNWKHYLHZVIRUWKHUHVLGHQWVZLWKHYHUJUHHQSODQWPDWHULDOWKDWZLOOSURYLGH\HDUURXQGSULYDF\'HFRUDWLYHZDOOVPD\EHXVHGZKHUHDSSOLFDEOHWRDGGUHVVQRLVHDQGSULYDF\FRQFHUQVIRUWKHUHVLGHQWVExisting 50th and France streetscape1234
4
5 6
6
7LANDSCAPE DESIGN PRINCIPALS
11
5
2
3
45
|
Pa
g
e
LANDSCAPE APPROACH
CL
O
S
E
D
O
F
F
T
O
V
E
H
I
C
L
E
S
F
O
R
S
P
E
C
I
A
L
E
V
E
N
T
S
-
S
U
C
H
A
S
E
D
I
N
A
A
R
T
F
A
I
R
OP
E
N
F
O
R
D
E
L
I
V
E
R
Y
A
N
D
L
I
G
H
T
A
U
T
O
M
O
B
I
L
E
T
R
A
F
F
I
C
WO
O
N
E
R
F
-
FO
S
T
E
R
I
N
G
A
F
L
E
X
I
B
L
E
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
E
A
L
M
46
|
Pa
LANDSCAPE APPROA CH
7K
H
F
H
Q
W
H
U
R
I
W
K
H
S
O
D
]
D
L
V
D
f l e x i b l e V
S
D
F
H
W
K
D
W
F
D
Q
a c c o m m o d a t e D
Y
D
U
L
H
W
\
R
I
X
V
H
V
V
X
F
K
D
V
R
X
W
G
R
R
U
PR
Y
L
H
V
F
K
L
O
G
U
H
Q
·
V
V
W
R
U
\
W
L
P
H
H
Y
H
Q
W
D
Q
G
P
R
U
H
$
Q
H
O
H
J
D
Q
W
Z
D
W
H
U
I
H
D
W
X
U
H
F
D
V
F
D
G
H
V
J
H
Q
W
O
H
Z
D
W
H
U
L
Q
WK
H
S
O
D
]
D
L
Q
W
K
H
V
X
P
P
H
U
P
R
Q
W
K
V
E
X
W
Z
L
O
O
E
H
D
F
W
L
Y
D
W
H
G
Z
L
W
K
L
Q
W
H
U
D
F
W
L
Y
H
O
L
J
K
W
L
Q
J
L
Q
W
K
H
Z
L
Q
W
H
U
7K
H
H
Q
W
L
U
H
W
\
R
I
W
K
H
S
O
D
]
D
V
S
D
F
H
Z
L
O
O
E
H
D
f l e x i b l e VSDFHWKDWFRXOGa c c o m m o d a t e DYDULHW\RI
HY
H
Q
W
V
D
Q
G
V
H
W
X
S
V
7
K
H
S
O
D
]
D
V
S
D
F
H
F
R
X
O
G
H
I
I
H
F
W
L
Y
H
O
\
K
R
V
W
K
R
O
L
G
D
\
P
D
U
N
H
W
V
D
Q
G
W
U
H
H
O
L
J
K
W
L
Q
J
FH
U
H
P
R
Q
L
H
V
I
R
U
V
K
R
S
S
H
U
V
V
H
D
U
F
K
L
Q
J
I
R
U
W
K
H
S
H
U
I
H
F
W
K
R
O
L
G
D
\
J
L
I
W
IRUIULHQGVDQGIDPLO\
SU
M
M
E
R
WI
N
T
E
R
CE
N
T
R
A
L
P
L
A
Z
A
-
A
F
L
E
X
B
I
L
E
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
S
P
A
C
E
T
H
A
T
A
D
A
P
T
S
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
S
E
A
S
O
N
S
47
|
Pa
g
e
EXTERIOR BIKE PARKING (58-60 BIKES)
AD
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
B
I
K
E
PA
R
K
I
N
G
I
N
G
A
R
A
G
E
BI
K
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
-
CO
M
P
L
E
T
E
T
H
E
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
E
X
P
E
R
I
E
N
C
E
LANDSCAPE APPROACH
48
|
Pa
g
e
LANDSCAPE APPROACH
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
S
C
R
E
E
N
AL
O
N
G
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
E
R
N
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
PORTIONS OF THE PARKING GARAGE FASCADE WILL BE COVERED IN A METALIC SCREEN (TBD) THAT WILL PROVIDE YEAR AROUND INTEREST WHILE VINES WILL COMPLIMENT THE STRUCTURE IN THE SPRING - FALL MONTHS
MU
C
H
O
F
T
H
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
V
E
G
E
T
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
O
N
G
T
H
E
B
A
C
K
-
SI
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
W
I
L
L
T
R
Y
T
O
B
E
P
R
E
-
SE
R
V
E
D
T
O
E
N
S
U
R
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
S
C
R
E
E
N
I
N
G
I
S
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
CO
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
E
L
E
V
E
A
T
I
O
N
W
I
T
H
A
P
P
R
O
X
I
M
A
T
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
T
R
E
E
S
A
N
D
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
Y
E
W
S
/
S
C
R
E
E
N
TH
E
U
N
D
E
R
S
T
O
R
Y
P
L
A
N
T
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
W
I
L
L
B
E
C
L
E
A
R
E
D
OU
T
T
O
M
A
K
E
R
O
O
M
F
O
R
A
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
O
U
S
R
O
W
O
F
Y
E
W
S
TH
A
T
W
I
L
L
F
O
R
M
A
N
E
V
E
R
G
R
E
E
N
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
B
E
T
W
E
E
N
TH
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
A
N
D
T
H
E
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
S
T
O
T
H
E
N
O
R
T
H
.
49
|
Pa
g
e
LANDSCAPE APPROACH
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
P
L
A
N
03.30.2017
BO
L
L
A
R
D
CO
D
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
MA
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
PR
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
CO
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
CO
M
M
E
N
T
S
BO
-
0
1
D
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
B
L
E
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
4
"
D
I
A
M
E
T
E
R
D
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
B
L
E
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
T
B
D
T
B
D
S
T
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
FE
N
C
E
&
G
U
A
R
D
R
A
I
L
CO
D
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
MA
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
PR
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
CO
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
CO
M
M
E
N
T
S
FE
-
0
1
D
E
C
O
R
A
T
I
V
E
F
E
N
C
E
1
"
D
I
A
.
P
O
W
D
E
R
C
O
A
T
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
P
I
C
K
E
T
TB
D
B
R
O
W
N
/
G
R
E
E
N
P
U
B
L
I
C
A
R
T
I
S
T
O
P
P
U
R
T
U
N
I
T
Y
FE
-
0
2
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
F
E
N
C
E
4
2
"
H
A
L
U
M
I
N
U
M
P
A
N
E
L
E
D
F
E
N
C
E
T
B
D
T
B
D
B
L
A
C
K
SU
B
J
E
C
T
T
O
C
H
A
N
G
E
F
O
R
T
E
N
A
N
T
N
E
E
PA
V
I
N
G
CO
D
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
MA
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
PR
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
CO
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
CO
M
M
E
N
T
S
P-
0
1
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
1
-
W
O
O
N
E
R
F
2
.
7
5
"
T
H
I
C
K
,
5
-
1
3
/
1
6
"
X
2
9
-
1
3
/
1
6
"
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
PL
A
N
K
P
A
V
E
R
T
B
D
P-
0
2
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
2
-
P
L
A
Z
A
P
A
V
E
R
S
2"
T
H
I
C
K
,
5
-
1
3
/
1
6
"
X
2
9
-
1
3
/
1
6
"
TE
C
T
U
R
A
PL
A
N
K
P
A
V
E
R
T
B
D
P-
0
3
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
3
-
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
P
A
V
I
N
G
6
"
X
1
2
"
TE
C
T
U
R
A
SA
N
D
S
E
R
I
E
S
T
B
D
P-
0
4
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
4
-
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
P
A
V
E
R
S
6
"
X
1
2
"
TE
C
T
U
R
A
SA
N
D
S
E
R
I
E
S
T
B
D
P-
0
5
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
5
-
S
O
L
D
I
E
R
C
O
U
R
S
E
3
"
X
1
2
"
TE
C
T
U
R
A
BL
A
S
T
E
D
G
L
A
S
S
B
G
-
2
0
6
P-
0
7
F
L
E
X
I
B
L
E
E
V
E
N
T
S
P
A
C
E
7.
8
0
X
4
7
.
1
7
X
¾
BE
L
G
A
R
D
NA
U
F
A
D
O
SI
T
E
F
U
R
N
I
T
U
R
E
CO
D
E
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
MA
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
PR
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
CO
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
CO
M
M
E
N
T
S
SF
-
0
1
A
S
S
O
R
T
E
D
P
L
A
N
T
E
R
S
2
4
"
-
3
6
"
H
P
L
A
N
T
E
R
W
/
H
.
S
S
T
E
E
L
T
U
B
E
F
R
A
M
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
W
I
T
H
I
P
E
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
E
P
A
N
E
L
S
.
M
A
G
L
I
N
ML
P
1
0
5
0
-
W
T
B
D
SF
-
0
2
S
I
T
E
B
E
N
C
H
6
F
O
O
T
,
B
A
C
K
E
D
,
F
S
C
1
0
0
%
J
A
T
O
B
A
H
A
R
D
W
O
O
D
S
L
A
T
S
,
N
O
S
E
A
T
D
I
V
I
D
E
R
S
FO
R
M
S
+
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
S
S
B
C
O
R
-
7
2
B
W
-
0
D
T
B
D
SF
-
0
2
B
B
U
I
L
T
-
I
N
S
E
A
T
I
N
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
SF
-
0
3
M
O
V
A
B
L
E
T
A
B
L
E
A
N
D
C
H
A
I
R
S
TB
D
TB
D
SF
-
0
4
B
I
K
E
R
A
C
K
SU
R
F
A
C
E
M
O
U
N
T
E
D
W
/
E
M
B
E
D
D
E
D
A
N
C
H
O
R
S
FO
R
M
S
+
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
S
C
A
P
I
T
O
L
CR
E
A
M
T
E
X
T
U
R
E
SF
-
0
5
B
I
K
E
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
A
N
C
E
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
TB
D
SF
-
0
9
C
O
V
E
R
E
D
G
A
S
F
I
R
E
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
RE
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
N
O
T
E
S
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
50
|
Pa
g
e
LANDSCAPE APPROACH
PL
A
N
T
P
A
L
L
E
T
T
E
18
N
E
-
F
16
N
E
-
F
16
N
E
-
F
4
R
H
-
G
2
R
H
-
G
10
R
H
-
G
6
R
H
-
G
14
R
H
-
G
43
N
E
-
F
2
A
C
-
R
26
N
E
-
F
3
R
H
-
G
3
A
C
-
R
4
G
L
-
T
14
R
H
-
G
37
N
E
-
F
4
G
L
-
T
41
N
E
-
F
9
V
I
N
E
22
V
I
N
E
6
R
H
-
G
2
A
C
-
R
1
B
E
-
P
3
-
B
E
-
P
6
-
C
A
-
K
3
-
B
E
-
N
3
-
B
E
-
N
33
-
S
P
-
H
27
-
S
P
-
H
5
-
P
A
-
V
9
-
P
A
-
V
21
-
N
E
-
F
8
-
R
H
-
G
DN
E
E
hW
hW
hW hW
hW
TR
A
S
H
TRASHSTAIR
ST
A
I
R
ST
A
I
R
ST
A
I
R
DN
E
E
hW
hW
hW hW
hW
TR
A
S
H
TRASHSTAIR
ST
A
I
R
ST
A
I
R
ST
A
I
R
TREES
C
O
D
E
Q
T
Y
B
O
T
A
N
I
C
A
L
N
A
M
E
/
C
O
M
M
O
N
N
A
M
E
AC-R 18 ACER RUBRUM `JFS-KW78` / ARMSTRONG GOLD MAPLE BE-N
3
BETULA NIGRA / RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNK TRANSPLANTED TREE BE-P
7
BETULA PENDULA / MULTI-TRUNK EUROPEAN WHITE BIRCH EXIST 23 EXIISTING SHADE TREE / PROTECT IN PLACE GL-T 6 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SKYCOLE` TM / SKYLINE THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST SHRUBS CODE
Q
T
Y
B
O
T
A
N
I
C
A
L
N
A
M
E
/
C
O
M
M
O
N
N
A
M
E
TBD
5
8
ASSORTED POTTED ANNUALS/PERRENIALS / TBD CA-K 6 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` / FEATHER REED GRASS NE-F
2
6
3
NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` / WALKERS LOW CATMINT PA-V 14 PANICUM VIRGATUM `PRAIRE FIRE` / RED SWITCH GRASS VINE 93 PARTHENOCISSUS QUINQUEFOLIA / VIRGINA CREEPER/BOSTON IVY MIX RE: ARCH ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATIONS RH-G 59 RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` / GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC SP-H 60 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS / PRAIRIE DROPSEED TA-M 51 TAXUS X MEDIA / UPRIGHT YEWPLANT SCHEDULE
HO
N
E
Y
L
O
C
U
S
T
-
S
K
Y
L
I
N
E
RIVER BIRCH COLUMNAR WHITE BIRCH
AR
M
S
T
R
O
N
G
G
O
L
D
M
A
P
L
E
WALKER’S LOW CATMINT
KA
R
L
F
O
E
R
S
T
E
R
G
R
A
S
S
TE
C
H
N
Y
A
R
B
O
R
V
I
T
A
E
GRO-LOW SUMAC
TR
E
E
S
STREETSCAPE PLANTINGS • SALT TOLERANT PLANTS
PL
A
Z
A
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
S
•
M
I
X
O
F
O
R
N
A
M
E
N
T
A
L
G
R
A
S
S
E
S
NO
R
T
H
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
R
A
M
P
S
C
R
E
E
N
I
N
G
•
S
H
A
D
E
T
O
L
E
R
A
N
T
E
V
E
R
G
R
E
E
N
S
A
N
D
V
I
N
E
S
PR
A
I
R
I
E
D
R
O
P
S
E
E
D
IV
Y
M
I
X
51
|
Pa
g
e
LANDSCAPE APPROACH
AD
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
S
I
T
E
A
M
E
N
I
T
I
E
S
BI
K
E
R
A
C
K
S
N
E
A
R
W
O
O
N
E
R
F
WA
T
E
R
F
E
A
U
R
E
I
N
C
E
N
T
R
A
L
P
L
A
Z
A
BU
I
L
T
I
N
S
E
A
T
I
N
G
A
L
O
N
G
W
O
O
N
E
R
F
EV
E
N
T
L
A
W
N
CA
T
E
N
A
R
Y
L
I
G
H
T
S
A
B
O
V
E
A
L
L
E
Y
S
ARTICIAL TURF - DOG RELIEF AREADECORATIVE FENCE W/ ART PIECEMOVABLE TABLE AND CHAIRS
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
L
I
G
H
T
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
52
|
Pa
g
e
BUILDNG MATERIALS
53
|
Pa
g
e
Construction Phasing Step 1 Fall 2017 Construction Scope:Xcel Energy & Utility upgrades beginning Fall 2017.Schedule determined by Xcel Energy Duration : Aprox. 1 Month Parking Impact: Limited closures in Surface Parking Area and Alleyways.North and Center Ramps Open Access Impact:Construction vehicles and temporay barriers in Surface Parking area and Alleyways.Construction Phasing
MA
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
54
|
Pa
g
e
Construction Phasing Step 2 January - April 2018 Construction Scope:North Ramp Vertical Expansion Duration : January - April 18’Parking Impact: North Ramp Closed. Center Ramp & Surface Open Defi cits shown below will be handled with Free Valet Parking (Vehicles to be parked within 2 blocks of district)Construction Parking to be off site and shuttle provided.District Parking Available:Daytime Peak (12-2pm): -89 stalls Access Impact:Traffi c on Market Street to be re-duced to 2 lanes. Jersey Barriers and protected walkways to be installed.Flagman onsite during construction hours.Construction Phasing
55
|
Pa
g
e
Construction Phasing Step 3 April - October 2018 Construction Scope:3930 & 3944 Construction continues Center Ramp Demolition South Mixed Use Construction Duration : April - October 18’Parking Impact: North Ramp Vertical expansion open. Center Ramp & Surface Closed Defi cits shown below will be handled with Free Valet Parking (Vehicles to be parked within 2 blocks of district)Construction Parking to be off site and shuttle provided.District Parking Available:Daytime Peak (12-2pm): -49 stalls Access Impact:Traffi c on Market Street to be re-duced to 2 lanes. Jersey Barriers and protected walkways to be installed.Pick Up/ Drop & Delivery points added to 50th street.Flagman onsite during construction hours.Construction Phasing
55
|
Pa
g
e
56
|
Pa
g
e
Construction Phasing Step 4 November - December 2018 Construction PhasingConstruction Scope:South Mixed Use Construction Duration : April - October 18’Parking Impact: North Mixed Use & Parking Open Center Ramp & Surface Closed Defi cits shown below will be han-dled with Free Valet Parking (Vehicles to be parked within 2 blocks of district)Construction Parking to be off site and shuttle provided.District Parking Available:Daytime Peak (12-2pm): +88 stalls Access Impact:Traffi c on Market Street to be re-duced to 2 lanes. Jersey Barriers and protected walkways to be installed.Pick Up/ Drop & Delivery points maintained on 50th street.Flagman onsite during construction hours.
56
|
Pa
g
e
57
|
Pa
g
e
Construction Phasing Step 5 January - September 2019 Construction PhasingConstruction Scope:South Mixed Use Construction Duration : January - September 19’Parking Impact: North Mixed Use & Parking Open Center Ramp & Surface Closed Defi cits shown below will be han-dled with Free Valet Parking (Vehicles to be parked within 2 blocks of district)Construction Parking to be off site and shuttle provided.District Parking Available:Daytime Peak (12-2pm): +189 stalls Access Impact:Traffi c on Market Street to be re-duced to 2 lanes. Jersey Barriers and protected walkways to be installed.Pick Up/ Drop & Delivery points maintained on 50th street.Flagman onsite during construction hours.
57
|
Pa
g
e
58
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
P
P
R
O
A
C
H
MA
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
|
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
Site Plan Updates
58
|
Pa
g
e
59
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
SI
T
E
P
L
A
N
U
P
D
A
T
E
S
1.
N
E
W
P
L
A
Z
A
D
E
S
I
G
N
C
O
N
F
I
G
U
R
A
T
I
O
N
2.
N
E
W
W
A
T
E
R
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
3.
N
E
W
W
O
O
N
E
R
F
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
/
P
A
V
I
N
G
L
A
Y
O
U
T
4.
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
S
I
T
E
T
R
E
E
S
/
V
E
G
E
T
A
T
I
O
N
5.
N
E
W
B
U
I
L
T
I
N
S
E
A
T
I
N
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
6.
N
E
W
S
C
R
E
E
N
I
N
G
F
O
R
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
Site Plan Updates
59
|
Pa
g
e
60
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
MA
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
P
L
A
Z
A
1.
A
D
A
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
2.
4
S
E
A
S
O
N
W
A
T
E
R
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
3.
1
,
5
0
0
S
F
F
L
E
X
I
B
L
E
E
V
E
N
T
S
P
A
C
E
4.
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
D
/
T
H
E
A
T
E
R
L
A
W
N
S
E
A
T
I
N
G
5.
G
A
S
F
I
R
E
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
6.
1
0
-
1
2
’
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
S
A
L
O
N
G
R
E
T
A
I
L
A
L
L
O
W
S
RO
O
M
F
O
R
T
E
N
A
N
T
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
S
P
A
C
E
S
60
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
61
|
Pa
g
e
61 61 61 61 61 6 61 1
|||||| Pa Pa Pa P Pa a a a a a a a a a a a a P P a a a P a a a a a a P a a a a a ge ge ge ge ge ge ge ge ge ge ge ge ge g ge ge g ge e ge g e e e g e g g ge ge ge ge g g e e g g e g g gMA
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
P
L
A
Z
A
1.
A
D
A
A
C
C
E
S
S
I
B
L
E
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
2.
4
S
E
A
S
O
N
W
A
T
E
R
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
3.
1
,
5
0
0
S
F
F
L
E
X
I
B
L
E
E
V
E
N
T
S
P
A
C
E
4.
T
E
R
R
A
C
E
D
/
T
H
E
A
T
E
R
L
A
W
N
S
E
A
T
I
N
G
5.
G
A
S
F
I
R
E
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
6.
1
0
-
1
2
’
W
A
L
K
W
A
Y
S
A
L
O
N
G
R
E
T
A
I
L
A
L
L
O
W
S
RO
O
M
F
O
R
T
E
N
A
N
T
A
M
E
N
I
T
Y
S
P
A
C
E
S
61
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
62
|
Pa
g
e
PL
A
Z
A
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
M
I
N
G
4
S
E
A
S
O
N
W
A
T
E
R
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
•
I
N
T
E
G
R
A
T
E
T
H
E
S
I
T
E
G
R
A
D
E
I
N
T
O
D
E
S
I
G
N
•
F
O
R
M
S
A
N
D
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
S
‘
B
E
R
M
A
N
G
L
A
S
S
’
P
A
N
E
L
•
L
I
T
F
R
O
M
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
F
O
R
S
U
B
T
L
E
G
L
O
W
A
T
N
I
G
H
T
WA
T
E
R
C
O
U
L
D
C
A
S
C
A
D
E
O
V
E
R
S
I
D
E
S
O
F
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
OR
R
U
N
D
O
W
N
L
E
N
G
T
H
I
N
T
O
T
R
E
N
C
H
D
R
A
I
N
I
N
W
I
N
T
E
R
,
U
S
E
L
E
D
O
P
T
I
C
S
T
O
S
I
M
U
L
A
T
E
W
A
T
E
R
FL
O
W
I
N
G
D
O
W
N
G
L
A
S
S
62
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
63
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
63
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
64
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
DA
Y
-
T
O
-
D
A
Y
-
C
A
F
E
S
T
Y
L
E
S
E
T
U
P
•
A
C
C
O
M
M
O
D
A
T
E
C
A
F
E
S
P
A
C
E
F
O
R
5
0
S
H
O
P
P
E
R
S
• 9 TABLES WITH 4 CHAIRS • 9-12 ALONG SEATWALL • 12-15 IN LAWN/BENCH AREA
64
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
65
|
Pa
g
e
DA
Y
E
V
E
N
T
-
S
T
O
R
Y
T
I
M
E
/
P
U
B
L
I
C
M
E
E
T
I
N
G
:
•
A
C
C
O
M
M
O
D
A
T
E
1
0
0
+
A
U
D
I
E
N
C
E
•
4
R
O
W
S
O
F
1
8
M
O
V
A
B
L
E
C
H
A
I
R
S
• 18 SPACES ALONG SEAT WALL
•
2
5
-
3
0
S
P
A
C
E
S
I
N
L
A
W
N
/
B
E
N
C
H
A
R
E
A
65
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
66
|
Pa
g
e
NI
G
H
T
E
V
E
N
T
-
M
O
V
I
E
I
N
‘
T
H
E
M
A
R
K
E
T
’
:
• ACCOMMODATE 100+ AUDIENCE
•
A
C
C
O
M
M
O
D
A
T
E
A
2
0
’
X
1
2
’
P
O
R
T
A
B
L
E
S
C
R
E
E
N
• 18 SPACES ALONG SEAT WALL
•
2
5
-
3
0
S
P
A
C
E
S
I
N
L
A
W
N
/
B
E
N
C
H
A
R
E
A
66
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
67
|
Pa
g
e
TE
R
R
A
C
E
D
/
T
H
E
A
T
E
R
S
E
A
T
I
N
G
•
5
%
S
L
O
P
E
D
L
A
W
N
•
S
H
A
D
E
D
W
/
3
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
R
B
I
R
C
H
•
B
A
C
K
L
E
S
S
B
E
N
C
H
E
S
F
O
R
F
L
E
X
I
B
I
L
I
T
Y
I
N
S
P
A
C
E
S
67
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
68
|
Pa
g
e
EV
E
N
T
-
A
R
T
F
A
I
R
/
G
A
M
E
S
/
M
A
R
K
E
T
:
• ACCOMMODATE 900SF OF SPACE
•
4
-
1
2
’
X
1
4
’
T
E
N
T
S
O
R
O
N
E
3
0
’
X
3
0
’
T
E
N
T
•
B
A
R
R
I
E
R
F
R
E
E
C
I
R
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
F
R
O
M
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T RETAIL/PEDESTRIAN ROUTE
68
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
69
|
Pa
g
e
FI
R
E
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
•
1
8
’
L
X
4
’
W
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
•
S
E
A
T
W
A
L
L
A
R
O
U
N
D
P
E
R
I
M
E
T
E
R
•
M
E
T
A
L
M
E
S
H
S
C
R
E
E
N
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
69
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
70
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
SC
R
E
E
N
I
N
G
A
N
D
F
E
N
C
I
N
G
:
•
M
E
T
A
L
P
O
S
T
S
A
R
R
A
Y
E
D
A
T
V
A
R
Y
I
N
G
A
N
G
L
E
S
•
O
P
P
O
R
T
U
N
I
T
Y
F
O
R
P
U
B
L
I
C
A
R
T
I
S
T
•
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
F
O
R
X
C
E
L
/
T
E
N
A
N
T
S
70
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
71
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
WO
O
N
E
R
F
•
B
U
I
L
T
I
N
S
E
A
T
I
N
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
O
R
L
I
V
A
B
L
E
CO
M
M
U
N
I
T
I
E
S
G
R
A
N
T
Q
U
A
L
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
•
B
I
K
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
A
L
O
N
G
E
D
G
E
O
F
D
R
I
V
E
A
I
S
L
E
T
O
DE
F
I
N
E
S
P
A
C
E
S
•
M
O
U
N
T
A
B
L
E
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
S
F
O
R
E
V
E
N
T
S
71
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
72
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
DO
W
N
T
O
W
N
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
’
S
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
E
A
L
M
•
P
A
V
E
R
S
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
L
Y
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
I
N
1
9
7
4
A
T
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
F
D
-
W
I
T
H
S
T
O
O
D
3
5
+
Y
E
A
R
S
O
F
H
E
A
V
Y
U
S
E
•
C
I
T
Y
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
N
E
W
P
A
V
E
R
S
I
N
2
0
1
5
F
O
R
Y
O
R
K
V
I
L
L
E
A
V
E
,
A
L
L
E
Y
W
A
Y
S
,
A
N
D
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
S
•
P
U
B
L
I
C
R
E
A
L
M
U
P
D
A
T
E
S
H
A
V
E
A
T
T
R
A
C
T
E
D
H
I
G
H
E
R
E
N
D
L
U
X
U
R
Y
R
E
T
A
I
L
T
E
N
A
N
T
S
A
N
D
H
I
G
H
E
R
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
V
A
L
U
E
S
72
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
73
|
Pa
g
eWO
O
N
E
R
F
P
L
A
N
T
E
R
S
/
S
E
A
T
(
3
)
:
•
1
8
”
-
2
4
”
H
P
L
A
N
T
E
R
W
I
T
H
1
8
”
H
S
E
A
T
•
A
L
L
O
W
S
F
O
R
T
R
E
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
W
I
T
H
I
N
W
O
O
N
E
R
F
•
S
M
A
L
L
,
C
O
L
U
M
N
A
R
B
I
R
C
H
/
A
S
P
E
N
•
P
O
S
S
I
B
L
E
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
F
O
R
R
O
T
A
T
I
N
G
A
R
T
73
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
74
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
PA
V
E
R
S
A
N
D
P
A
T
T
E
R
N
I
N
G
•
M
A
K
E
W
O
O
N
E
R
F
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
T
O
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
P
E
D
E
S
T
R
I
A
N
P
A
V
I
N
G
•
S
O
L
D
I
E
R
C
O
U
R
S
E
B
A
N
D
I
N
G
T
O
B
R
E
A
K
U
P
L
A
R
G
E
A
R
E
A
S
O
F
P
A
V
E
R
S
•
A
B
L
E
N
D
O
F
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
/
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
P
A
V
E
R
•
I
N
C
O
R
P
O
R
A
T
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
‘
5
0
T
H
A
N
D
F
R
A
N
C
E
’
P
A
T
T
E
R
N
/
C
O
L
O
R
W
H
E
R
E
A
P
P
R
O
P
R
I
A
T
E
74
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
75
|
Pa
g
e
PL
A
Z
A
P
A
V
I
N
G
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
•
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
‘
P
L
A
N
K
’
P
A
V
E
R
S
•
B
E
L
G
A
R
D
‘
M
I
R
A
G
E
W
O
O
D
’
P
A
V
E
R
S
75
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
76
|
Pa
g
e
WO
O
N
E
R
F
P
A
V
I
N
G
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
•
T
I
E
I
N
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
P
A
V
E
R
S
I
N
5
0
T
H
A
N
D
F
R
A
N
C
E
•
I
N
T
R
O
D
U
C
E
‘
P
L
A
N
K
’
P
A
V
E
R
I
N
T
O
W
O
O
N
E
R
F
T
H
A
T
WI
L
L
A
L
S
O
C
A
R
R
Y
I
N
T
O
M
A
R
K
E
T
P
L
A
Z
A
76
|
Pa
g
e
Site Plan Updates
77
|
Pa
g
e
Watershed District
ki
m
l
e
y
-
h
o
r
n
.
c
o
m
25
5
0
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
A
v
e
n
u
e
W
e
s
t
,
S
u
i
t
e
2
3
8
N
,
S
t
.
P
a
u
l
,
M
N
5
5
1
1
4
65
1
6
4
5
4
1
9
7
To
:
Ro
s
s
B
i
n
t
n
e
r
–
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
,
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
Je
s
s
i
c
a
V
a
n
d
e
r
w
e
r
f
f
W
i
l
s
o
n
–
W
a
t
e
r
R
e
s
ou
r
c
e
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
o
r
,
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
H
e
i
d
i
Q
u
i
n
n
–
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
T
e
c
h
n
i
c
i
a
n
,
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
Fr
o
m
:
Ro
n
L
e
a
f
,
P
.
E
.
,
Ki
m
l
e
y
-
H
o
r
n
D
a
n
E
l
e
n
b
a
a
s
,
P
.
E
.
,
K
i
m
l
e
y
-
H
o
r
n
Da
t
e
:
Ju
n
e
2
,
2
0
1
7
Su
b
j
e
c
t
:
Th
e
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
–
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
E
d
i
n
a
,
M
N
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
M
e
m
o
r
a
n
d
u
m
Bu
h
l
I
n
v
e
s
t
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
S
a
t
u
r
d
a
y
P
r
o
p
er
t
i
e
s
a
r
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
i
n
g
t
o
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
2
.
86
a
c
r
e
s
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
o
f
M
a
r
k
e
t
St
r
e
e
t
,
w
e
s
t
o
f
F
r
an
c
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
i
n
E
d
i
n
a
.
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
i
s
a
m
i
x
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
s
p
a
c
e
,
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
re
t
a
i
l
,
a
n
d
l
u
x
u
r
y
a
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
.
Ki
m
l
e
y
-
H
o
r
n
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
a
n
d
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
Ed
i
n
a
(
C
i
t
y
)
a
n
d
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
(M
C
W
D
)
a
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
M
e
m
o
r
a
n
d
u
m
d
a
te
d
M
a
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
1
7
.
T
h
a
t
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
m
e
m
o
r
a
n
d
u
m
de
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
o
u
r
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
ti
n
g
a
n
d
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
io
n
s
a
n
d
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
o
u
l
d
co
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
M
C
W
D
R
u
l
e
s
.
T
h
e
s
i
t
e
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
t
o
i
n
c
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
su
r
f
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
t
h
i
s
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
i
n
t
e
n
d
s
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
a
n
u
p
d
a
t
e
o
f
t
h
e
M
a
r
c
h
3
rd
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
n
f
i
r
m
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
s
t
i
l
l
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
M
C
W
D
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
So
u
t
h
o
f
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
e
x
i
s
ts
a
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
a
n
d
a
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
(
t
h
e
‘
C
e
n
te
r
R
a
m
p
’
)
w
i
t
h
as
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
,
a
l
l
e
y
s
,
a
n
d
a
s
m
a
l
l
a
m
o
u
n
t
o
f
r
a
is
e
d
p
l
a
n
t
e
r
b
e
d
s
i
m
m
e
d
i
a
t
e
l
y
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
.
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
i
s
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
of
c
a
t
c
h
b
a
s
i
n
s
a
n
d
r
u
n
s
d
i
re
c
t
l
y
t
o
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
s
t
o
r
m
se
w
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
i
n
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
.
No
r
t
h
o
f
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
e
x
i
s
t
s
t
h
e
f
o
rm
e
r
H
o
o
t
e
n
C
l
e
a
n
e
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
,
a
p
a
r
k
i
ng
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
(
t
h
e
‘
N
o
r
t
h
R
a
m
p
’
)
an
d
a
v
a
c
a
n
t
p
a
r
c
e
l
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
f
o
r
m
e
r
l
y
t
h
e
E
d
i
n
a
R
e
a
l
ty
S
i
t
e
.
T
h
e
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
i
s
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
t
h
e
po
i
n
t
i
n
t
i
m
e
j
u
s
t
p
r
i
o
r
t
o
t
h
e
d
e
m
o
li
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
E
d
i
n
a
R
e
a
l
t
y
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
.
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
i
s
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d
i
n
a
se
r
i
e
s
o
f
c
a
t
c
h
b
a
s
i
n
s
a
n
d
r
u
n
s
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
t
o
th
e
C
i
t
y
’
s
s
t
o
r
m
s
e
w
e
r
i
n
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
.
Th
e
r
e
i
s
s
o
i
l
a
n
d
g
r
o
u
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
c
o
n
t
a
m
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
s
i
t
e
d
u
e
to
p
a
s
t
d
r
y
c
l
e
a
n
e
r
u
s
e
s
o
n
t
h
e
H
o
o
t
e
n
C
l
e
a
n
e
r
pa
r
c
e
l
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
o
r
m
e
r
E
d
i
n
a
R
e
a
l
t
y
p
a
r
c
e
l
.
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
Re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
w
i
t
h
a
ne
w
m
i
x
e
d
u
s
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
c
on
s
i
s
t
i
n
g
o
f
u
n
d
e
r
g
r
o
u
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
,
g
r
o
u
n
d
f
l
o
o
r
r
e
t
a
i
l
a
n
d
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
p
a
c
e
s
,
a
n
d
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
a
b
o
v
e
.
P
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
p
a
v
e
r
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
w
i
d
e
l
y
us
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
g
a
t
h
e
r
i
n
g
s
p
a
c
e
s
a
n
d
a
l
l
e
y
s
.
De
c
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
i
n
t
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
n
t
l
y
u
s
e
d
fo
r
w
a
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
,
h
a
r
d
s
c
a
p
e
de
s
i
g
n
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
l
e
o
r
w
h
e
r
e
ne
e
d
e
d
f
o
r
t
r
u
c
k
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
I
n
t
h
e
s
e
c
a
s
e
s
,
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
s
l
o
p
e
d
t
o
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
a
r
e
a
s
f
o
r
Page 2
ki
m
l
e
y
-
h
o
r
n
.
c
o
m
2550 University Avenue West, Suite 238N, St. Paul, MN 55114 651 645 4197
ab
s
t
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
.
P
l
a
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
g
r
e
e
n
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
i
n
stalled on the roof of the new mixed use building as
pa
r
t
o
f
t
h
e
s
u
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
i
t
i
a
t
i
v
e
. In addition to the new pervious areas, the remaining stormwater
ru
n
o
f
f
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
o
u
t
e
d
t
o
a
s
e
r
i
e
s
o
f
c
a
t
c
h
b
a
s
i
n
s
a
n
d
ultimately discharge in the City’s storm sewer system
in
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
.
Re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
w
i
l
l
b
u
i
l
d
u
p
o
n
the existing North Ramp by adding additional
pa
r
k
i
n
g
o
n
b
o
t
h
s
i
d
e
s
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
t
h
e
t
o
p
o
f
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
ng ramp. There will also be new ground floor retail
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
e
d
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
a
n
d
w
e
st of the existing ramp. The expanded ramp will
ca
p
t
u
r
e
r
u
n
o
f
f
o
n
t
h
e
t
o
p
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
t
h
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
a
m
p
a
n
d route it to the City’s storm sewer system in
Ma
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
.
WA
T
E
R
S
H
E
D
D
I
S
T
R
I
C
T
R
U
L
E
S
F
O
R
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
f
a
l
l
s
u
n
d
e
r
M
C
W
D
S
t
o
r
mwater Management Rule Section 4 (Redevelopment Requirements –
De
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
r
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
i
n
I
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
us Surface), subsection (c) for si tes between one an d five acres and
di
s
t
u
r
b
i
n
g
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
4
0
%
o
f
t
h
e
site. Table 3 on page 10 of the MCWD Rule provides additional detail
re
l
a
t
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
,
i
n
cluding a category for projects that will result in a
te
n
p
e
r
c
e
n
t
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
.
F
o
r
p
r
oject meeting these criteria there are no applicable
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
m
a
n
a
gement (i.e., phosphorus and volume control do not apply).
Ma
r
c
h
3
,
2
0
1
7
P
l
a
n
Existing Condition Proposed Condition % Change in Impervious
Pe
r
v
i
o
u
s
0.58 ac 0.81 ac
Im
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
2.28 ac 2.05 ac -10.1%
Ju
n
e
2
,
2
0
1
7
P
l
a
n
Pe
r
v
i
o
u
s
0.33 ac 0.64 ac
Im
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
2.53 ac 2.22 ac -12.2%
Fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
M
C
W
D
s
t
aff, and as noted in the table above, the areas assumed to be
pe
r
v
i
o
u
s
/
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
a
r
e
a
s
h
a
v
e
b
e
e
n
adjusted from the March 3, 2017 Plan to the June 2, 2017 Plan.
Th
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
t
o
n
o
t
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
a
v
e
r
a
r
e
a
s as pervious and not counting the green roof as
im
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
.
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
o
f
0
.
6
4
acres for the May 31, 2017 Plan includes areas of
gr
a
s
s
b
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
s
,
p
l
a
n
t
e
r
s
a
n
d
p
o
r
o
u
s
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
T
h
e
resulting net change in impervious for the site
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
t
o
j
u
s
t
o
v
e
r
1
2
%
.
Re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
r
a
t
e
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
,
t
h
e
r
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
surface and the continuation of existing routing will
re
s
u
l
t
i
n
n
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
t
h
e
d
i
s
c
h
a
rge rates leaving the project site.
Th
e
a
b
o
v
e
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
a
t
t
a
c
h
e
d
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
i
n
g
e
x
h
i
b
i
t
s
d
e
m
o
n
s
t
r
a
t
e
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
a
s
c
o
m
p
ared to existing conditions by in creasing the amount of pervious
ar
e
a
.
P
e
r
M
C
W
D
R
u
l
e
s
,
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
m
e
e
t
s
t
h
e
S
t
o
r
mwater Management requirements by reducing the
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
r
e
a
i
m
p
e
r
v
i
o
u
s
s
u
r
f
a
c
e
b
y
m
o
r
e
t
h
a
n
1
0
%
.
A MCWD permit application for Erosion Control will
be
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
a
n
d
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
y
w
i
t
h
M
C
W
D
a
n
d
C
i
t
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Pl
e
a
s
e
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
D
a
n
a
t
(
7
6
3
)
2
5
1
-
1
0
1
1
,
o
r
R
o
n
at (612) 294-9742, if you have any questions.
78
|
Pa
g
e
Energy Design A s s i s t a n c e Program
AP
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
MI
N
N
E
S
O
TA
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
N
e
w
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
20
1
0
E
N
E
R
G
Y
D
E
S
I
G
N
A
S
S
I
S
T
A
N
C
E
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
PA
G
E
1
O
F
2
10-03-526 | 03/2010
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
n
a
m
e
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
D
a
t
e
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
i
t
y
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
S
t
a
t
e
_
_
_
_
_
_
Z
I
P
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
d
a
t
e
_____________________________
Pl
e
a
s
e
e
n
s
u
r
e
a
l
l
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
,
a
s
a
l
l
r
e
b
a
t
e
c
h
e
c
k
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
s
e
n
t
t
o
t
h
i
s
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
.
Co
m
p
a
n
y
n
a
m
e
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Bi
l
l
i
n
g
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
i
t
y
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
S
t
a
t
e
_
_
_
_
_
_
Z
I
P
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
n
a
m
e
(
p
r
i
n
t
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
S
i
g
n
a
t
u
r
e
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Ph
o
n
e
(
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
F
a
x
(
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
o
n
t
a
c
t
e
-
m
a
i
l
*
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
*B
y
p
r
o
v
i
d
i
n
g
y
o
u
r
e
-
m
a
i
l
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
,
y
o
u
a
r
e
g
r
a
n
t
i
n
g
X
c
e
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
p
e
r
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
t
o
s
e
n
d
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
e
-
m
a
i
l
s
a
b
o
u
t
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
r
e
c
i
p
i
e
n
t
n
a
m
e
(
p
r
i
n
t
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
S
i
g
n
a
t
u
r
e
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
C
i
t
y
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
S
t
a
t
e
_
_
_
_
_
_
Z
I
P
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
a
l
F
i
r
m
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Contact name _______________________________________
E-
m
a
i
l
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
P
h
o
n
e
(
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Contact name _______________________________________
E-
m
a
i
l
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
P
h
o
n
e
(
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Me
c
h
a
n
i
c
a
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Contact name _______________________________________
E-
m
a
i
l
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
P
h
o
n
e
(
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Contact name _______________________________________
E-
m
a
i
l
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
P
h
o
n
e
(
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
Cu
s
t
o
m
e
r
’
s
D
e
s
i
g
n
T
e
a
m
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
IN
T
E
R
N
A
L
U
S
E
O
N
L
Y
–
P
L
E
A
S
E
D
O
N
O
T
W
R
I
T
E
I
N
T
H
I
S
S
P
A
C
E
E
D
A
E
D
A
q
u
i
c
k
EDA enhanced
Xc
e
l
E
n
e
r
g
y
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
m
a
n
a
g
e
r
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
Th
e
E
d
i
n
a
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
Edina MN 55424
Ed
i
n
a
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
L
L
C
14
0
0
V
a
n
B
u
r
e
n
S
t
N
E
Minneapolis MN
5
5
4
1
3
Br
e
n
t
R
o
g
e
r
s
61
2
-
9
6
8
-
3
7
2
8
brogers@saturdayproperties Peter Deanovic
51
0
0
E
d
e
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
S
u
i
t
e
3
1
7
E
d
i
n
a
M
N
5
5
4
3
6
Mo
h
a
g
e
n
H
a
n
s
e
n
tm
o
h
a
g
e
n
@
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
h
a
n
s
e
n
.
c
o
m
952-426-7400
Fr
a
n
a
C
o
m
p
a
n
i
e
s
Mike Benedict
mi
k
e
@
f
r
a
n
a
.
c
o
m
952-935-8600
St
e
e
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
Kurt Smith
ku
r
t
s
m
@
s
t
e
e
n
e
n
g
.
c
o
m
763-585-6742
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
Brent Rogers
br
o
g
e
r
s
@
s
a
t
u
r
d
a
y
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
c
o
m
612-419-6680
79
|
Pa
g
e
Existing Site Photos
80
|
Pa
g
e
Forestry Review Meeting
DF
/
MEETING MINUTES
DA
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
401 2nd Avenue North, Suite 4 10 Minneapolis, MN 55401
D a t e :
M
a
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
7
P r o j e c t N a m e :
M
a
r
k
e
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
A t t e n d i n g :
Lu
t
h
e
r
O
v
e
r
h
o
l
t
–
C
i
t
y
F
o
r
e
s
t
e
r
-
E
d
i
n
a
,
K
e
v
i
n
H
e
n
n
F r o m :
D
F
/
K
e
v
i
n
H
e
n
n
0.
0
1
N
o
r
t
h
S
i
d
e
o
f
N
o
r
t
h
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
R
a
m
p
0.
0
1
.
1
L
u
t
h
e
r
–
T
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
m
a
n
y
i
n
v
a
s
i
v
e
,
n
o
n
-
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
p
e
c
i
e
s in existing group of plant material along property
bo
u
n
d
a
r
y
;
P
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
t
o
o
n
l
y
p
r
e
s
erve cottonwoods, oaks, honey locust , and maples. No desire to save
ba
s
s
w
o
o
d
s
,
e
l
m
s
,
b
o
x
e
l
d
e
r
s
,
h
a
c
k
b
e
r
r
y
s
,
m
u
l
b
e
r
r
y
,
e
t
c
.
0.
0
2
S
t
r
e
e
t
T
r
e
e
s
0.
0
2
.
1
R
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
e
e
t
t
r
e
e
s
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
fied two trees in strong enough condition to transplant
an
d
o
n
e
t
r
e
e
t
o
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
(
s
e
e
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
)
0.
0
2
.
2
C
o
n
f
i
r
m
e
d
a
5
’
w
i
d
e
p
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
c
c
e
p
t
able for street trees (planting area between edge of
lo
w
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
o
f
c
e
n
t
e
r
r
a
mp and back of curb
0.
0
2
.
3
D
i
s
c
u
s
s
e
d
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
s
p
e
c
i
e
s
a
n
d
m
o
d
i
f
i
ed planting schedule based on discussion
0.
0
2
.
3
.
1
0.
0
3
S
o
u
t
h
M
a
r
k
e
t
T
r
e
e
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
0.
0
3
.
1
T
r
e
e
s
t
h
a
t
a
p
p
e
a
r
e
d
o
n
s
u
r
v
e
y
a
r
e
n
o
l
o
n
g
e
r
o
n
s
i
t
e
0.
0
3
.
2
M
a
n
y
t
r
e
e
s
p
e
c
i
e
s
w
e
r
e
m
i
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
a
s
m
a
t
u
r
e
maples but were species Luther deemed unimportant to
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
0.
0
3
.
3
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
h
e
a
l
t
h
R
i
v
e
r
B
i
r
c
h
t
r
e
e
s
a
n
d
e
v
e
r
g
r
e
e
n
Y
e
ws that would be good tree to transplant and use for
th
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
p
h
a
s
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
E
W
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
UP
UP
UP
UP
UP
DN
UP
UP
UP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
J
K
C
C
C
C C
CCC
C
CCC
33' ‐ 0"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"34' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"30' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"26' ‐ 0"17' ‐ 0"
16
'
‐
0
"
15
'
‐
2
"
10
'
‐
6
"
17
'
‐
0
"
12
'
‐
0
"
5
'
‐
0
"
1
1
'
‐
0
"
15
'
‐
0
"
16
'
‐
4
"
8'
‐
6
"
18
'
‐
0
"
24
'
‐
0
"
18
'
‐
0
"
16
'
‐
6
"
CCCC
C C
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
J
K
1'
‐
6
"
8'
‐
6
"
1' ‐ 6"
1'
‐
6
"
1' ‐ 6"
1'
‐
6
"
1' ‐ 6"
1'
‐
6
"
1' ‐ 6"
C
C
C
C
CC
C CC
C C C
C
L
C C C C C C C C C C
14
'
‐
6
"
19
'
‐
1
"
18
'
‐
0
"
19' ‐ 0"
24
'
‐
0
"
TY
P
.
18
'
‐
0
"
GATE FOR RESIDENTIAL
ACCESS ONLY
HOLD OUT FOR
FUTURE EXPANSION
C C
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE
AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
NOT F O R CON S TRUC T I ON
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
48932
TODD NOVAK AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
C:\Revit Projects\France Ave Phase
I_gschneider.rvt
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
F
r
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
P
h
a
s
e
I
_
g
s
c
h
n
e
i
d
e
r
.
r
v
t
A200
FLOOR PLAN ‐ LEVELS P2
& P1
Checker
Author
Issue Date
16311
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
EDINA, MN
1/16" = 1'‐0"A200
1 LEVEL P2
1/16" = 1'‐0"A200
2 LEVEL P1
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
1 Revised City Submittal 3/31/17
2 Final Development Plan 6/2/17
DN
DN
DN UP
UP
UPUP
UP
UP
UP
UP
DN
UP
A300
2
A3012
A300
A301
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
10
'
‐
6
"
17
'
‐
0
"
12
'
‐
0
"
5
'
‐
0
"
1
1
'
‐
0
"
15
'
‐
0
"
16
'
‐
4
"
J
K
33' ‐ 0"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"34' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"30' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"26' ‐ 0"17' ‐ 0"
29' ‐ 4 9/16"117' ‐ 4 7/16"24' ‐ 0"124' ‐ 11"27' ‐ 6" 48' ‐ 8"76' ‐ 10"
74
'
‐
8
"
6'
‐
4
"
60
'
‐
4
"
62
'
‐
4
"
62
'
‐
4
"
STAIR
STAIR
STAIR
STAIR
84' ‐ 4"
12
4
'
‐
4
"
41
'
‐
8
"
A3014
A3016 5
3
2' ‐ 0"
20' ‐ 0"
25' ‐ 10"82' ‐ 4"44' ‐ 0"
119' ‐ 6"26' ‐ 6"
L
RETAIL
TRASH
RETAIL
AMENITY
RETAIL
PARKING ENTRANCE
PUBLIC
PARKING
ENTRANCE
TRASH
RETAIL RETAIL
HOUSING
ENTRANCE
A300
2
A3012
A300
A301
1
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
J
K
A3014 3
L
4"
AMENITY
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE
AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
NOT F O R CON S TRUC T I ON
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
48932
TODD NOVAK AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
C:\Revit Projects\France Ave Phase
I_gschneider.rvt
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
F
r
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
P
h
a
s
e
I
_
g
s
c
h
n
e
i
d
e
r
.
r
v
t
A201
FLOOR PLAN ‐ LEVELS 1 &
2
TN
GS
06/02/17
16311
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
EDINA, MN
1/16" = 1'‐0"A201
1 LEVEL 1
1/16" = 1'‐0"A201
2 LEVEL 2
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
1 Revised City Submittal 3/31/17
2 Final Development Plan 6/2/17
A300
2
A3012
A300
A301
1
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
J
K
A3014
A3016 5
3
L
MECH./ELEV.
EQUIP.
MECH./ELEV.
EQUIP.
ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO
BE DETERMINED.
ALL MECHNICAL UNITS TO BE SCREENED
PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE
AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
NOT F O R CON S TRUC T I ON
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
48932
TODD NOVAK AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
C:\Revit Projects\France Ave Phase
I_gschneider.rvt
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
F
r
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
P
h
a
s
e
I
_
g
s
c
h
n
e
i
d
e
r
.
r
v
t
A204
ROOF PLAN
Checker
Author
06/02/17
16311
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
EDINA, MN
1/16" = 1'‐0"A204
1 ROOF PLAN
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
1 Revised City Submittal 3/31/17
2 Final Development Plan 6/2/17
LEVEL 1
100' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 2
116' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 3
128' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 4
139' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 5
151' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 6
162' ‐ 6"
1234567891011121314151617
T.O. COPING
173' ‐ 0"
T.O. BLDG. FEATURE
182' ‐ 0"
MTL‐3
MTL‐2
CST‐1
BR‐1A
CST‐1
BR‐1
CST‐3 CST‐3
PB‐1
SF‐2
CST‐1
PB‐1
TYP.
BR‐3A
CST‐1
BR‐3
CST‐4 CST‐1 CST‐1BR‐2A
CWP‐2
PB‐1 TYP.SF‐2 MTL‐1 CWP‐1 MTL‐3
PB‐1 TYP.
MTL‐2
CST‐1
SF‐1
MTL‐2
MTL‐1
CWP‐1
CST‐1
BR‐3A
CWP‐1
CST‐1
BR‐3
CST‐3CST‐3
CST‐3
BR‐1ABR‐1CST‐1
CST‐3
CST‐1
MTL‐5
CST‐4
BR‐1A
BR‐1
T.O. PARAPET
174' - 10"
LEVEL 1
100' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 2
116' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 3
128' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 4
139' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 5
151' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 6
162' ‐ 6"
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
T.O. COPING
173' ‐ 0"
T.O. BLDG. FEATURE
182' ‐ 0"
CST‐4
BR‐3
CST‐1
CWP‐1
BR‐3A
CST‐1
CWP‐1
MTL‐1
MTL‐2 SF‐1
MTL‐3 MTL‐2 CWP‐1 MTL‐1
MTL‐1 MTL‐1
SF‐2
CWP‐2
SF‐2
CST‐1
CWP‐2
PB‐1 TYP.
BR‐3A
CST‐1
BR‐3
CST‐4 CST‐3 CST‐3
PB‐1
TYP.
MTL‐3
MTL‐2
CST‐1
BR‐1A
SF‐1
CST‐1
BR‐1
CST‐1BR‐2ACST‐1CST‐3
CST‐1
MTL‐5
MTL‐4
CST‐2 BR‐1A BR‐1
BR‐1 BRICK 1 ‐BRICK COLOR 1, SIZE: MODULAR
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
BR‐1A BRICK 1A ‐BRICK COLOR 1, SIZE: UTILITY
BR‐2 BRICK 2 ‐BRICK COLOR 2, SIZE: MODULAR
BR‐2A BRICK 2A ‐BRICK COLOR 2, SIZE: UTILITY
CST‐1 CAST STONE 1 ‐CAST STONE COLOR 1, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
CST‐2 CAST STONE 2 ‐CAST STONE COLOR 2, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
CST‐3 CAST STONE 3 ‐CAST STONE AT GRADE, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
MTL‐1 METAL 1 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; COLOR: DARK GRAY
MTL‐2 METAL 2 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; COLOR: MEDIUM GRAY
MTL‐3 METAL 3 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; TERRA COTTA LOOK; COLOR: PATINA GREEN
SF‐1 STUCCO FINISH‐: COLOR: FRENCH GRAY
SF‐2 STUCCO FINISH‐: COLOR: WHITE
CWP‐1 CONCRETE WALL PANEL 1 ‐: COLOR: DARK GRAY
CWP‐2 CONCRETE WALL PANEL 2 ‐: COLOR: LIGHT GRAY
PB‐1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM BALCONY SYSTEM ‐
MTL‐4 METAL 4 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; STANDING SEAM; COLOR: RED
MTL‐5 METAL 5 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; COLOR: LIGHT GRAY
BR‐3 BRICK 3 ‐BRICK COLOR 3, SIZE: MODULAR
BR‐3A BRICK 3A ‐BRICK COLOR 3, SIZE: UTILITY
CST‐4 CAST STONE 4 ‐CAST STONE AT GRADE, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE
AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
NOT F O R CON S TRUC T I ON
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
48932
TODD NOVAK AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
C:\Revit Projects\France Ave Phase
I_gschneider.rvt
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
F
r
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
P
h
a
s
e
I
_
g
s
c
h
n
e
i
d
e
r
.
r
v
t
A300
EXTERIOR BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
Checker
Author
06/02/17
16311
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
EDINA, MN
1/16" = 1'‐0"A300
1 NORTH ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'‐0"A300
2 SOUTH ELEVATION
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
1 Revised City Submittal 3/31/17
2 Final Development Plan 6/2/17
LEVEL 2
116' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 3
128' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 4
139' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 5
151' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 6
162' ‐ 6"
A B C D E F G H J K
T.O. COPING
173' ‐ 0"
T.O. BLDG. FEATURE
182' ‐ 0"
SF‐1
TYP.
MTL‐2
MTL‐1
CWP‐1
CST‐1
BR‐3A
CWP‐1
CST‐1
BR‐3
CST‐4 CST‐4
PB‐1
TYP.
CWP‐2
CST‐1
BR‐2A
CWP‐1
BR‐3CST‐2
LEVEL 1
100' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 2
116' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 3
128' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 4
139' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 5
151' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 6
162' ‐ 6"
ABCDEFGHJK
T.O. COPING
173' ‐ 0"
T.O. BLDG. FEATURE
182' ‐ 0"
L
MTL‐3
MTL‐2
CST‐1
BR‐1A
SF‐2
CST‐1
BR‐1
CST‐3 CST‐3
BR‐1
CST‐1
SF‐1
BR‐1A
CST‐1
MTL‐2
MTL‐3
PB‐1 TYP.
LEVEL 1
100' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 2
116' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 3
128' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 4
139' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 5
151' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 6
162' ‐ 6"
A B C D E F G H J K
T.O. COPING
173' ‐ 0"
T.O. BLDG. FEATURE
182' ‐ 0"
L
A306
3
MTL‐3
MTL‐2
CST‐1
BR‐1A
CST‐1
BR‐1
CST‐3 CST‐4 CST‐3
SF‐2
PB‐1
TYP.
MTL‐3
MTL‐2
CST‐1
BR‐1A
CST‐1
BR‐1
BR‐3
BR‐3A
LEVEL 1
100' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 2
116' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 3
128' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 4
139' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 5
151' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 6
162' ‐ 6"
ABCDEFGHJK
T.O. COPING
173' ‐ 0"
T.O. BLDG. FEATURE
182' ‐ 0"
L
CWP‐2
CST‐1
BR‐2A
CST‐1
CST‐4 CST‐4
BR‐3
CST‐1
BR‐2A
CST‐1
PB‐1 CWP‐2
CWP‐2
BR‐3A
CST‐1
LEVEL 1
100' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 2
116' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 3
128' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 4
139' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 5
151' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 6
162' ‐ 6"
A B C D E F G H J K
T.O. COPING
173' ‐ 0"
T.O. BLDG. FEATURE
182' ‐ 0"
CST‐1
CST‐1
MTL‐2
SF‐2
SF‐2
MTL‐2
CST‐1
BR‐2A
CST‐1
CWP‐2
LEVEL 1
100' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 2
116' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 3
128' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 4
139' ‐ 6"
LEVEL 5
151' ‐ 0"
LEVEL 6
162' ‐ 6"
ABCDEFGH
T.O. COPING
173' ‐ 0"
T.O. BLDG. FEATURE
182' ‐ 0"
CWP‐1
MTL‐2
SF‐1
CST‐1
CST‐1
CWP‐1
SF‐2
MTL‐2
CST‐2
BR‐1 BRICK 1 ‐BRICK COLOR 1, SIZE: MODULAR
EXTERIOR MATERIALS LEGEND
BR‐1A BRICK 1A ‐BRICK COLOR 1, SIZE: UTILITY
BR‐2 BRICK 2 ‐BRICK COLOR 2, SIZE: MODULAR
BR‐2A BRICK 2A ‐BRICK COLOR 2, SIZE: UTILITY
CST‐1 CAST STONE 1 ‐CAST STONE COLOR 1, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
CST‐2 CAST STONE 2 ‐CAST STONE COLOR 2, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
CST‐3 CAST STONE 3 ‐CAST STONE AT GRADE, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
MTL‐1 METAL 1 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; COLOR: DARK GRAY
MTL‐2 METAL 2 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; COLOR: MEDIUM GRAY
MTL‐3 METAL 3 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; TERRA COTTA LOOK; COLOR: PATINA GREEN
SF‐1 STUCCO FINISH‐: COLOR: FRENCH GRAY
SF‐2 STUCCO FINISH‐: COLOR: WHITE
CWP‐1 CONCRETE WALL PANEL 1 ‐: COLOR: DARK GRAY
CWP‐2 CONCRETE WALL PANEL 2 ‐: COLOR: LIGHT GRAY
PB‐1 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM BALCONY SYSTEM ‐
MTL‐4 METAL 4 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; STANDING SEAM; COLOR: RED
MTL‐5 METAL 5 ‐PREFINISHED METAL; COLOR: LIGHT GRAY
BR‐3 BRICK 3 ‐BRICK COLOR 3, SIZE: MODULAR
BR‐3A BRICK 3A ‐BRICK COLOR 3, SIZE: UTILITY
CST‐4 CAST STONE 4 ‐CAST STONE AT GRADE, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE
AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
NOT F O R CON S TRUC T I ON
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
48932
TODD NOVAK AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
C:\Revit Projects\France Ave Phase
I_gschneider.rvt
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
F
r
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
P
h
a
s
e
I
_
g
s
c
h
n
e
i
d
e
r
.
r
v
t
A301
EXTERIOR BUILDING
ELEVATIONS
Checker
Author
Issue Date
16311
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
EDINA, MN
1/16" = 1'‐0"A301
1 WEST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'‐0"A301
2 EAST ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'‐0"A301
3 WEST ELEVATION ‐ BUILDING 2C
1/16" = 1'‐0"A301
4 EAST ELEVATION ‐ BUILDING 2B
1/16" = 1'‐0"A301
5 WEST ELEVATION ‐ BUILDING 2B
1/16" = 1'‐0"A301
6 EAST ELEVATION ‐ BUILDING 2A
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
1 Revised City Submittal 3/31/17
2 Final Development Plan 6/2/17
1
1
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
13
13
14
14
15
15
16
16
17
17
18
18
19
19
20
20
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
26
27
27
A
B
C
H
I
TRASH
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
A
B
C
H
I
PROPOSED
SNOW CHUTE
LOCATION
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE
AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
NOT F O R CON S TRUC T I ON
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
48932
TODD NOVAK, AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
C:\Revit Projects\France Ave Phase II - North
Ramp_gschneider.rvt
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
F
r
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
-
N
o
r
t
h
R
a
m
p
_
g
s
c
h
n
e
i
d
e
r
.
r
vt
A201
TIER 1 & 2
TD
GS
06/02/17
16311
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
EDINA, MN
1/16" = 1'‐0"A201
1 LEVEL 1
1/16" = 1'‐0"A201
2 LEVEL 2
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
1 Revised City Submittal 3/31/17
2 Final Development Plan 6/2/17
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
A
B
C
H
I
PROPOSED
SNOW CHUTE
LOCATION
1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
A
B
C
H
I
PROPOSED
SNOW CHUTE
LOCATION
44' ‐ 3"12' ‐ 7"13' ‐ 0"13' ‐ 0"
1' ‐ 6" 2' ‐ 8"
15' ‐ 0" 7' ‐ 2"25' ‐ 5"2' ‐ 5" 18' ‐ 3"20' ‐ 6"20' ‐ 6"20' ‐ 6"18' ‐ 2"20' ‐ 6"20' ‐ 6"20' ‐ 6"18' ‐ 3" 2' ‐ 4"27' ‐ 6"27' ‐ 6"16' ‐ 1"15' ‐ 1"20' ‐ 10"
16
'
‐
0
"
40
'
‐
7
"
56
'
‐
6
"
7'
‐
2
"
12
0
'
‐
3
"
424' ‐ 0"
EXISTING
207' ‐ 10"
DATE:
DRAWN BY:
CHECKED BY:
PROJECT NUMBER:
1000 Twelve Oaks Center
Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391
Tel 952-426-7400
Fax 952-426-7440
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
P
H
A
S
E
IS
S
U
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
A
M
E
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE
AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
COMPUTER DIRECTORY:
NOT F O R CON S TRUC T I ON
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
48932
TODD NOVAK, AIA, NCARB
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
REGISTRATION NUMBER:
C:\Revit Projects\France Ave Phase II - North
Ramp_gschneider.rvt
C:
\
R
e
v
i
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
F
r
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
-
N
o
r
t
h
R
a
m
p
_
g
s
c
h
n
e
i
d
e
r
.
r
vt
A202
TIER 3 & 4
Checker
Author
06/02/17
16311
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
ENTITLEMENT
MARKET STREET ‐ MIXED
USE
EDINA, MN
1/16" = 1'‐0"A202
1 LEVEL 3
1/16" = 1'‐0"A202
2 LEVEL 4
NO. DESCRIPTION DATE
1 Revised City Submittal 3/31/17
2 Final Development Plan 6/2/17
4
A300
PHASE I SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"
EXISTING/ REMODELED STRUCTUREBUILDING ADDITION BUILDING ADDITION
100'-0"
LEVEL 1
110'-10"
LEVEL 2
120'-10"
LEVEL 3
130'-10"
LEVEL 3
140'-10"
LEVEL 5
154'-0"
T.O. ELEV./STAIR
145'-2"
T.O. WALL
100'-0"
LEVEL 1
1
A300
PHASE I NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"
110'-10"
LEVEL 2
120'-10"
LEVEL 3
130'-10"
LEVEL 3
140'-10"
LEVEL 5
EXISTING/ REMODELED STRUCTURE BUILDING ADDITIONBUILDING ADDITION
154'-0"
T.O. ELEV./STAIR
145'-2"
T.O. WALL
2
A300
PHASE I WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"
100'-0"
LEVEL 1
110'-10"
LEVEL 2
120'-10"
LEVEL 3
130'-10"
LEVEL 3
140'-10"
LEVEL 5
154'-0"
T.O. ELEV./STAIR
145'-2"
T.O. WALL
3
A300
PHASE I EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION
1/16" = 1'-0"
100'-0"
LEVEL 1
110'-10"
LEVEL 2
120'-10"
LEVEL 3
130'-10"
LEVEL 3
140'-10"
LEVEL 5
154'-0"
T.O. ELEV./STAIR
145'-2"
T.O. WALL
STONE 1- LIMESTONE PANELS, SIZE AND SHAPES PER DRAWINGS
ART FRAME 1- PREFINISHED METAL FRAME FOR INTERCHANGEABLE ARTWORK
PERFORATED METAL PANEL 1- PREFINISHED PERFORATED METAL PANEL: COLOR:
GRAY
PERFORATED METAL PANEL 2- PREFINISHED PERFORATED METAL PANEL
METAL 1- PREFINISHED METAL COPING AND TRIM; COLOR: DARK GRAY
EXTERIOR PAINT 1- PREFINISHED METAL COPING AND TRIM; COLOR: GRAY
PHASE I EXTERIOR MATERIALS
PHASE I
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
-
A300N
THE COLLABORTIVEREDEVELOPMENT
.
49 1/2 STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE DEEMED THE
AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE
INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN
ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY AND OTHER
RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF
THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS.
16311.0PDV
----
03/03/2017
k:\jobs\Edina
NOT
F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
K:
\
J
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
\
4
9
.
5
f
r
a
n
c
e
_
1
6
3
1
1
.
p
p
d
v
\
0
5
_
D
w
g
\
4
9
s
o
u
t
h
f
r
a
n
c
e
a
v
e
n
u
e
\
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
1
6
3
1
1
-
A
3
0
0
P
h
a
s
e
I
E
x
t
e
r
i
o
r
E
l
e
v
a
�
o
n
s
.
d
w
g
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
TODD NOVAK, AIA, NCARB
REGISTRATION NUMBER:48932
CONC
CONC
CST-1
CST-1
MTL-MTL-
CONCCONC
CST-1 CAST STONE
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
C
O
V
E
R
P
A
G
E
L
-
0
0
1
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
D
A
T
E
T
H
E
C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
T
I
V
E
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
4
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
T
H
E
A
U
T
H
O
R
S
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
T
A
I
N
A
L
L
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
W
,
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
S
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
O
F
T
H
E
A
T
T
A
C
H
E
D
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
.
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
A
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
4
0
1
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
S
U
I
T
E
4
1
0
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
M
N
5
5
4
0
1
T
e
l
6
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
7
5
2
2
S:\2016 Projects\16-244 49 and France\1 CAD\Sheets\ARCHIVE\L-General-Sheets.dwg
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
F
I
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
2
0
6
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
6
1
6
3
1
1
.
0
P
D
V
T
W
H
I
T
L
O
C
K
k
:
\
j
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
E
N
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
K
H
E
N
N
0
6
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
6
MARKET ST
R
E
E
T
EDINA, MINNESOTA THE COLLABORATIVE D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
OWNERBUHL INVESTORS/SATURDAY PROPERTIESBUHL INVESTORS5100 EDEN AVENUESUITE 317EDINA MN, 55346TELEPHONE (612) 968-3728CONTACT: PETER DEANOVICSATURDAY PROPERTIES1400 VAN BUREN STREET NESUITE 200 - 202MINNEAPOLIS MN, 55413TELEPHONE (612) 360-3113CONTACT: BRENT ROGERSLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTDAMON FARBERPREPARED BY KEVIN HENN401 2ND AVENUE N.STE. 410MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401T: 612-332-7522ARCHITECTMOHAGEN HANSEN1000 Twelve OaksCenter Dr.Suite 200Wayzata MN 55391 Tel 952.426.7400Fax 952.426.7440CONTACT: TODD NOVAKCIVILKIMLEY HORN2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W, SUITE 238 NST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197TELEPHONE (651) 643-0470CONTACT: DAN ELENBAAS PROJECT DIRECTORY DAMON FARBER PROJECT NO. 16-244
S
H
E
E
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
L
-
0
0
1
C
o
v
e
r
P
a
g
e
L
-
0
0
3
T
r
e
e
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
L
-
0
1
0
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
L
-
0
3
0
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
a
n
d
S
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
L
-
1
2
0
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
P
l
a
n
L
-
1
6
0
P
l
a
n
t
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
L
-
4
1
0
E
n
l
a
r
g
e
m
e
n
t
M
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
L
-
5
0
0
H
a
r
d
s
c
a
p
e
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
S
H
E
E
T
I
N
D
E
X
C
L
E
A
R
O
U
T
U
N
D
E
R
S
T
O
R
Y
P
L
A
N
T
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
/
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
P
L
A
N
T
S
1
.
5
"
C
A
L
.
O
R
L
A
R
G
E
R
PRESERVE SHRUB (10)
H
E
D
G
E
12 3 465789
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
16 17181921222324252627
2
8
2
9
3
0
3
1
3
2
3
3
3
4
3
5
3
7
3
8
3
9
4
0
4
1
4
2
4
3
44 45 46
4
7
4
8
5
0
5
1
5
2
5
3
5
4
5
5
5
6
5
7
5
8
5
9
6
0
6
1
6
2
6
3
6
4
6
5
6
6
6
7
T
R
E
E
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
L
-
0
0
3
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
D
A
T
E
T
H
E
C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
T
I
V
E
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
4
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
T
H
E
A
U
T
H
O
R
S
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
T
A
I
N
A
L
L
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
W
,
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
S
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
O
F
T
H
E
A
T
T
A
C
H
E
D
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
.
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
A
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
4
0
1
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
S
U
I
T
E
4
1
0
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
M
N
5
5
4
0
1
T
e
l
6
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
7
5
2
2
S:\2016 Projects\16-244 49 and France\1 CAD\Sheets\ARCHIVE\L-General-Sheets.dwg
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
F
I
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
2
0
6
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
6
1
6
3
1
1
.
0
P
D
V
T
W
H
I
T
L
O
C
K
k
:
\
j
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
E
N
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
K
H
E
N
N
0
6
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
6
C
O
D
E
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
1
3
-
6
"
B
O
X
-
D
E
M
O
2
3
-
6
"
H
A
C
K
-
D
E
M
O
3
9
"
B
O
X
-
D
E
M
O
4
9
"
B
O
X
-
D
E
M
O
5
6
"
H
A
C
K
-
D
E
M
O
6
4
"
H
A
C
K
-
D
E
M
O
7
6
"
H
A
C
K
-
D
E
M
O
8
1
5
"
L
O
C
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
9
5
"
L
O
C
-
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
1
0
5
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
1
1
5
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
1
2
3
"
C
R
A
B
-
D
E
M
O
1
3
5
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
1
4
7
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
1
5
N
O
L
O
N
G
E
R
O
N
S
I
T
E
1
6
6
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
1
7
6
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
1
8
6
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
1
9
6
"
L
O
C
-
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
2
1
9
"
S
P
O
G
-
D
E
M
O
2
2
3
"
M
P
-
D
E
M
O
2
3
5
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
2
4
3
"
M
P
L
-
D
E
M
O
2
5
3
"
B
A
S
S
W
O
O
D
-
D
E
M
O
2
6
3
"
B
A
S
S
W
O
O
D
-
D
E
M
O
2
7
2
"
J
U
N
I
P
E
R
-
D
E
M
O
2
8
7
"
A
S
H
-
D
E
M
O
2
9
2
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
3
0
2
"
L
O
C
-
D
E
M
O
3
1
8
"
L
O
C
-
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
3
2
3
-
5
"
B
I
R
C
H
-
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
3
3
3
"
M
P
L
-
D
E
M
O
3
4
2
"
M
P
L
-
D
E
M
O
3
5
1
9
"
M
P
L
-
D
E
M
O
3
6
N
O
L
O
N
G
E
R
O
N
S
I
T
E
3
7
1
7
"
M
P
L
-
D
E
M
O
3
8
3
"
B
I
R
C
H
-
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
3
9
3
"
B
I
R
C
H
-
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
4
0
1
"
M
P
L
-
D
E
M
O
4
1
3
"
M
P
L
-
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
?
4
2
1
"
M
P
L
-
D
E
M
O
4
3
3
"
B
I
R
-
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
4
4
3
"
E
L
M
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
4
5
7
"
A
S
H
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
4
6
9
"
A
S
H
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
4
7
7
"
A
S
H
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
4
8
1
3
"
E
L
M
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
0
1
0
"
A
S
H
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
1
6
"
M
P
L
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
2
8
"
B
O
X
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
3
1
2
"
H
A
C
K
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
4
8
"
M
P
L
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
5
1
2
"
C
O
T
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
6
4
"
H
A
C
K
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
7
6
"
B
O
X
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
8
5
"
E
V
G
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
5
9
6
"
B
O
X
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
6
0
1
2
"
B
O
X
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
6
1
8
"
C
O
T
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
6
2
2
4
"
C
O
T
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
6
3
6
"
C
O
T
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
6
4
8
"
B
O
X
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
6
5
1
8
"
B
O
X
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
6
6
1
2
"
B
O
X
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
6
7
8
"
B
O
X
-
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
T
R
E
E
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
0
f
e
e
t
3
2
1
"
=
1
6
'
1
6
4
8
3
6
15
BOLLARDSYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Q
T
Y
D
E
T
A
I
L
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
C
O
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
DEMOUNTABLE BOLLARD
8
6
/
L
-
5
0
0
4
"
D
I
A
M
E
T
E
R
D
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
B
L
E
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
T
B
D
T
B
D
S
T
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
FENCE & GUARDRAILSYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Q
T
Y
D
E
T
A
I
L
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
C
O
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
C
O
M
M
E
N
T
S
DECORATIVE FENCE
1
4
8
L
F
5
/
L
-
5
0
0
2
"
D
I
A
.
P
O
W
D
E
R
C
O
A
T
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
P
I
C
K
E
T
T
B
D
B
R
O
W
N
/
G
R
E
E
N
P
U
B
L
I
C
A
R
T
I
S
T
O
P
P
U
R
T
U
N
I
T
Y
ENCLOSURE FENCE
4
9
L
F
4
2
"
H
A
L
U
M
I
N
U
M
P
A
N
E
L
E
D
F
E
N
C
E
T
B
D
T
B
D
B
L
A
C
K
S
U
B
J
E
C
T
T
O
C
H
A
N
G
E
F
O
R
T
E
N
A
N
T
N
E
E
D
S
HANDRAILSYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Q
T
Y
D
E
T
A
I
L
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
HANDRAIL
4
/
L
-
5
0
0
T
B
D
S
T
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
PAVINGSYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Q
T
Y
D
E
T
A
I
L
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
C
O
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
PAVING TYPE 1- WOONERF
S
F
1
/
L
-
5
0
0
2
.
7
5
"
T
H
I
C
K
,
5
-
1
3
/
1
6
"
X
2
9
-
1
3
/
1
6
"
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
P
L
A
N
K
P
A
V
E
R
C
R
E
A
M
PAVING TYPE 2 - PLAZA PAVERS
S
F
1
/
L
-
5
0
0
2
"
T
H
I
C
K
,
5
-
1
3
/
1
6
"
X
2
9
-
1
3
/
1
6
"
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
P
L
A
N
K
P
A
V
E
R
C
R
E
A
M
PAVING TYPE 3 - PERMEABLE PAVING
S
F
2
/
L
-
5
0
0
6
"
X
1
2
"
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
S
A
N
D
S
E
R
I
E
S
M
A
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
PAVING TYPE 4 - IMPERMEABLE PAVERS
S
F
6
"
X
1
2
"
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
S
A
N
D
S
E
R
I
E
S
M
A
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
PAVING TYPE 5 - SOLDIER COURSE
S
F
1
/
L
-
5
0
0
3
"
X
1
2
"
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
B
L
A
S
T
E
D
G
L
A
S
S
B
G
-
2
0
6
PAVING TYPE 6 - CONCRETE
S
F
4
"
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
W
A
L
K
B
R
O
O
M
F
I
N
I
S
H
FLEXIBLE EVENT SPACE
S
F
7
.
8
0
X
4
7
.
1
7
X
¾
B
E
L
G
A
R
D
N
A
U
F
A
D
O
SITE FURNITURESYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Q
T
Y
D
E
T
A
I
L
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
C
O
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
ASSORTED PLANTERS
6
5
2
4
"
-
3
6
"
H
P
L
A
N
T
E
R
W
/
H
.
S
S
T
E
E
L
T
U
B
E
F
R
A
M
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
W
I
T
H
I
P
E
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
E
P
A
N
E
L
S
.
M
A
G
L
I
N
M
L
P
1
0
5
0
-
W
T
B
D
SITE BENCH
1
3
6
F
O
O
T
,
B
A
C
K
E
D
,
F
S
C
1
0
0
%
J
A
T
O
B
A
H
A
R
D
W
O
O
D
S
L
A
T
S
,
N
O
S
E
A
T
D
I
V
I
D
E
R
S
F
O
R
M
S
+
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
S
S
B
C
O
R
-
7
2
B
W
-
0
D
T
B
D
BUILT-IN SEATING ELEMENT
7
/
L
-
5
0
0
H
.
S
S
T
E
E
L
T
U
B
E
F
R
A
M
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
W
I
T
H
I
P
E
W
O
O
D
S
I
D
E
P
A
N
E
L
S
.
C
U
S
T
O
M
MOVABLE TABLE AND CHAIRS
3
9
T
B
D
T
B
D
BIKE RACK
2
8
3
/
L
-
5
0
0
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
M
O
U
N
T
E
D
W
/
E
M
B
E
D
D
E
D
A
N
C
H
O
R
S
F
O
R
M
S
+
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
S
C
A
P
I
T
O
L
C
R
E
A
M
T
E
X
T
U
R
E
BIKE MAINTAINANCE STATION
T
B
D
LOUNGE CHAIRS
T
B
D
T
B
D
T
B
D
T
B
D
COVERED GAS FIRE FEATUREWATER FEATURESYMBOL DESCRIPTION
Q
T
Y
D
E
T
A
I
L
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
/
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
/
M
O
D
E
L
C
O
L
O
R
/
F
I
N
I
S
H
CUSTOM WATER FEATURE
4
0
`
X
5
`
C
U
S
T
O
M
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
W
/
1
/
2
"
G
L
A
S
S
P
A
N
E
L
B
O
T
T
O
M
C
U
S
T
O
M
T
A
N
A
M
I
P
A
N
E
L
B
Y
B
E
R
M
A
N
G
L
A
S
S
F
R
O
S
T
E
D
W
H
I
T
E
BO-01FE-01FE-02HR-01P-01P-02P-03P-04P-05P-06P-07SF-01SF-02SF-02BSF-03SF-04SF-05SF-06SF-09WF-01 MATERIALS SCHEDULE
N
U
M
B
E
R
T
I
T
L
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
S
1
/
L
-
0
3
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
R
E
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
I
N
S
O
F
T
S
C
A
P
E
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
0
2
/
L
-
0
3
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
S
H
R
U
B
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
3
3
/
L
-
0
3
0
P
L
A
N
-
P
L
A
N
T
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
2
L
-
0
3
0
4
/
L
-
0
3
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
P
E
R
E
N
N
I
A
L
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
1
5
/
L
-
0
3
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
R
E
E
A
N
C
H
O
R
S
Y
S
T
E
M
`
P
L
A
T
I
P
U
S
`
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
4
6
/
L
-
0
3
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
R
E
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
A
T
P
A
V
E
R
S
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
6
1
/
L
-
5
0
0
P
L
A
N
-
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
P
L
A
N
K
P
A
V
E
R
L
A
Y
O
U
T
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
4
P
-
0
1
,
P
-
0
2
,
P
-
0
5
2
/
L
-
5
0
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
U
N
I
T
P
A
V
I
N
G
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
2
P
-
0
3
3
/
L
-
5
0
0
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
B
I
K
E
R
A
C
K
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
3
S
F
-
0
4
4
/
L
-
5
0
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
H
A
N
D
R
A
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
7
H
R
-
0
1
5
/
L
-
5
0
0
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
D
E
C
O
R
A
T
I
V
E
F
E
N
C
E
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
1
F
E
-
0
1
6
/
L
-
5
0
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
D
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
B
L
E
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
I
N
P
A
V
I
N
G
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
5
B
O
-
0
1
7
/
L
-
5
0
0
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
B
U
I
L
T
I
N
B
E
N
C
H
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
5
S
F
-
0
2
B
D
E
T
A
I
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
H
A
R
D
S
C
A
P
E
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
L
0
1
0
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
D
A
T
E
T
H
E
C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
T
I
V
E
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
4
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
T
H
E
A
U
T
H
O
R
S
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
T
A
I
N
A
L
L
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
W
,
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
S
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
O
F
T
H
E
A
T
T
A
C
H
E
D
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
.
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
A
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
4
0
1
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
S
U
I
T
E
4
1
0
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
M
N
5
5
4
0
1
T
e
l
6
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
7
5
2
2
S:\2016 Projects\16-244 49 and France\1 CAD\Sheets\L-Hard-Sheets.dwg
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
F
I
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
2
0
6
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
6
1
6
3
1
1
.
0
P
D
V
T
W
H
I
T
L
O
C
K
k
:
\
j
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
E
N
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
K
H
E
N
N
0
6
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
6
TREESCODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
S
I
Z
E
C
O
N
T
.
N
O
T
E
S
AC-R18ACER RUBRUM `JFS-KW78` / ARMSTRONG GOLD MAPLE
4
"
C
A
L
.
B
&
B
S
I
N
G
L
E
L
E
A
D
E
R
,
W
E
L
L
B
R
A
N
C
H
E
D
BE-N3BETULA NIGRA / RIVER BIRCH MULTI-TRUNKTRANSPLANTED TREE
E
X
I
S
T
.
T
R
A
N
S
P
L
A
N
T
BE-P 7BETULA PENDULA / MULTI-TRUNK EUROPEAN WHITE BIRCH
B
&
B
EXIST23EXIISTING SHADE TREE / PROTECT IN PLACE
V
A
R
I
E
S
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
GL-T6GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SKYCOLE` TM / SKYLINE THORNLESS
H
O
N
E
Y
L
O
C
U
S
T
4
"
C
A
L
.
SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME
S
I
Z
E
C
O
N
T
.
N
O
T
E
S
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
TBD58ASSORTED POTTED ANNUALS/PERRENIALS / TBD
V
A
R
I
E
S
P
O
T
4
2
"
o
.
c
.
CA-K6CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER` / FEATHER REED GR
A
S
S
#
2
C
O
N
T
.
P
L
A
N
T
A
S
S
H
O
W
N
O
N
P
L
A
N
2
4
"
o
.
c
.
NE-F263NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW` / WALKERS LOW CATMINT
#
1
C
O
N
T
.
3
0
"
o
.
c
.
PA-V14PANICUM VIRGATUM `PRAIRE FIRE` / RED SWITCH GRASS
#
2
3
6
"
o
.
c
.
VINE93PARTHENOCISSUS QUINQUEFOLIA / VIRGINA CREEPER/BOSTON IVY MIXRE: ARCH ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATIONS
V
A
R
I
E
S
T
R
A
Y
T
R
A
Y
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
T
B
D
7
2
"
o
.
c
.
RH-G59RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` / GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC
#
1
C
O
N
T
.
P
L
A
N
T
A
S
S
H
O
W
N
O
N
P
L
A
N
4
8
"
o
.
c
.
SP-H60SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS / PRAIRIE DROPSEED
#
5
2
4
"
o
.
c
.
TA-M51TAXUS X MEDIA / UPRIGHT YEW
6
`
H
G
T
B
&
B
7
2
"
o
.
c
.
PLANT SCHEDULE
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
&
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
L
0
3
0
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
D
A
T
E
T
H
E
C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
T
I
V
E
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
4
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
T
H
E
A
U
T
H
O
R
S
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
T
A
I
N
A
L
L
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
W
,
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
S
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
O
F
T
H
E
A
T
T
A
C
H
E
D
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
.
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
A
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
4
0
1
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
S
U
I
T
E
4
1
0
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
M
N
5
5
4
0
1
T
e
l
6
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
7
5
2
2
S:\2016 Projects\16-244 49 and France\1 CAD\Sheets\L-Plant-Sheets.dwg
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
F
I
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
2
0
6
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
6
1
6
3
1
1
.
0
P
D
V
T
W
H
I
T
L
O
C
K
k
:
\
j
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
E
N
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
K
H
E
N
N
0
6
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
6
N
O
T
E
:
1
.
S
E
E
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
3
2
-
9
3
0
0
"
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
P
L
A
N
T
S
"
F
O
R
M
O
R
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
.
4"18"
P
L
A
N
T
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
E
Q
.
2
"
D
E
P
T
H
M
U
L
C
H
A
R
O
U
N
D
T
R
E
E
-
H
O
L
D
M
U
L
C
H
A
W
A
Y
F
R
O
M
R
O
O
T
F
L
A
R
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
S
O
I
L
S
-
S
E
E
'
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
S
O
I
L
S
'
I
N
S
P
E
C
R
O
O
T
F
L
A
R
E
S
E
T
1
"
A
B
O
V
E
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
E
D
G
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
S
V
A
R
Y
,
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
P
L
A
N
S
C
O
M
P
A
C
T
E
D
S
U
B
G
R
A
D
E
,
S
E
E
C
I
V
I
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
S
C
O
R
E
B
A
L
L
I
F
R
O
O
T
B
O
U
N
D
R
O
U
G
H
E
N
S
L
O
P
E
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
S
H
R
U
B
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
3
L
-
0
3
0
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
3
2
EQ.
C
L
C
L
C
L
C
L
E
Q
.
N
O
T
E
:
1
.
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
F
O
R
P
L
A
N
T
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
.
2
.
S
E
E
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
3
2
-
9
3
0
0
"
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
P
L
A
N
T
S
"
F
O
R
M
O
R
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
.
G
R
I
D
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
L
A
Y
O
U
T
P
L
A
N
EQ.
C
L
C
L
T
R
I
A
N
G
U
L
A
R
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
L
A
Y
O
U
T
P
L
A
N
E
Q
.
1
2
P
L
A
N
T
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
U
N
L
E
S
S
O
T
H
E
R
W
I
S
E
N
O
T
E
D
O
N
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
1
2
P
L
A
N
T
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
U
N
L
E
S
S
O
T
H
E
R
W
I
S
E
N
O
T
E
D
O
N
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
EDGE OF PLANT BED
EDGE OF PLANT BED
P
L
A
N
-
P
L
A
N
T
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
3
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
2
COMPACTED SUBGRADE, SEE CIVILDRAWINGS SCORE BALL IF ROOTBOUND 2" DEPTH MULCH AROUND TREE - HOLDMULCH AWAY FROM ROOT FLARELANDSCAPE SOILS - SEE 'PLANTINGSOILS' IN SPEC ROOT FLARE SET 1" ABOVE FINISHEDGRADEROUGHEN SLOPE4"18"EQ.EDGE CONDITIONS VARY, REFER TOPLANSNOTE:1. SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION32-9300 "EXTERIOR PLANTS" FORMORE INFORMATION.SECTION - PERENNIAL PLANTING3/4" = 1'-0"3L-0304
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
1
CLTOP OF ROOT BALL TO BE 2"ABOVE SPECIFIED SOIL MIXANCHOR MAT, RE: SPECSADJACENT PLANTINGPLANTING MIX, RE: SPECSPLATIPUS ANCHOR SYSTEM,RE: SPECS LIGHTING PER PLAN TREE TRUNK2X ROOT BALL DIA. OR5'-0", WHICHEVER IS GREATER 3" EARTH SAUCER 3'-0", TYP.REMOVE BURLAP AND BASKETFROM TOP 1/3 OF BALL ANDREMOVE FROM SITE 3" MULCH LAYER3'-0"MINSECTION - TREE ANCHOR SYSTEM 'PLATIPUS'1/2" = 1'-0"5P-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
4
R
O
O
T
F
L
A
R
E
E
V
E
N
W
I
T
H
F
I
N
I
S
H
G
R
A
D
E
+
1
"
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
B
U
R
L
A
P
,
W
I
R
E
B
A
S
K
E
T
&
R
O
P
E
I
N
P
L
A
C
E
2
"
M
U
L
C
H
A
R
O
U
N
D
T
R
E
E
-
H
O
L
D
M
U
L
C
H
A
W
A
Y
F
R
O
M
T
R
E
E
F
L
A
R
E
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
S
O
I
L
S
A
U
C
E
R
F
O
R
W
A
T
E
R
I
N
G
-
R
E
M
O
V
E
P
R
I
O
R
T
O
S
U
R
F
A
C
E
F
I
N
I
S
H
I
N
G
C
O
M
P
A
C
T
E
D
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
C
O
U
R
S
E
P
E
D
E
S
T
A
L
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
S
O
I
L
S
-
S
E
E
'
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
S
O
I
L
S
'
I
N
S
P
E
C
A
M
E
N
D
E
D
S
U
B
G
R
A
D
E
R
O
U
G
H
E
N
S
L
O
P
E
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
B
R
A
N
C
H
E
S
F
R
O
M
D
A
M
A
G
E
S
I
N
G
L
E
D
O
M
I
N
A
N
T
L
E
A
D
E
R
P
L
A
N
T
T
R
E
E
T
R
U
N
K
P
L
U
M
B
+
/
-
1
0
'
M
I
N
.
7
0
0
F
T
³
S
O
I
L
P
E
R
T
R
E
E
I
N
C
L
.
R
O
O
T
B
A
L
L
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
R
E
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
I
N
S
O
F
T
S
C
A
P
E
1
/
2
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
0
4"
P
E
R
S
P
E
C
1'-0"
1
'
-
0
"
2"
C
L
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
R
E
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
A
T
P
A
V
E
R
S
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
P
A
V
I
N
G
,
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
H
A
R
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
R
O
O
T
B
A
R
R
I
E
R
,
3
0
"
D
E
P
T
H
H
E
L
D
2
"
B
E
L
O
W
T
O
P
O
F
A
D
J
.
C
U
R
B
T
O
P
O
F
R
O
O
T
B
A
L
L
T
O
B
E
2
"
A
B
O
V
E
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
E
D
S
O
I
L
M
I
X
.
H
O
L
D
M
U
L
C
H
3
"
O
F
C
R
O
W
N
.
T
R
E
E
A
N
C
H
O
R
,
3
P
E
R
T
R
E
E
P
E
R
P
L
A
N
S
C
L
6
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
6
D
N
DN
D
N
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
UP
T
R
A
S
H
T
R
A
S
H
S
T
A
I
R
S
T
A
I
R
S
T
A
I
R
STAIR
D
N
DN
D
N
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
UP
T
R
A
S
H
T
R
A
S
H
S
T
A
I
R
S
T
A
I
R
S
T
A
I
R
STAIRP-01P-04 P-04
P
-
0
5
P
-
0
7
P
-
0
2
P
-
0
2
P
-
0
2
P
-
0
5
P
-
0
2
P
-
0
3
P
-
0
4
P
-
0
4
P-04P-01P-05 P-03
P
-
0
3
P
-
0
3
F
E
-
0
1
S
F
-
0
5
S
F
-
0
4
S
F
-
0
2
F
E
-
0
1
S
F
-
0
2
S
F
-
0
4
FE-02
S
F
-
0
2
SF-
0
4
S
F
-
0
9
SF-02B
S
F
-
0
2
B
S
F
-
0
2
B
W
F
-
0
1
H
R
-
0
1
H
R
-
0
1
B
O
-
0
1
P
-
0
6
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
C
O
D
E
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
B
O
-
0
1
D
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
B
L
E
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
F
E
N
C
E
&
G
U
A
R
D
R
A
I
L
C
O
D
E
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
F
E
-
0
1
D
E
C
O
R
A
T
I
V
E
F
E
N
C
E
F
E
-
0
2
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
F
E
N
C
E
H
A
N
D
R
A
I
L
C
O
D
E
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
H
R
-
0
1
H
A
N
D
R
A
I
L
P
A
V
I
N
G
C
O
D
E
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
P
-
0
1
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
1
-
W
O
O
N
E
R
F
P
-
0
2
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
2
-
P
L
A
Z
A
P
A
V
E
R
S
P
-
0
3
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
3
-
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
P
A
V
I
N
G
P
-
0
4
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
4
-
I
M
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
P
A
V
E
R
S
P
-
0
5
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
5
-
S
O
L
D
I
E
R
C
O
U
R
S
E
P
-
0
6
P
A
V
I
N
G
T
Y
P
E
6
-
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
P
-
0
7
F
L
E
X
I
B
L
E
E
V
E
N
T
S
P
A
C
E
S
I
T
E
F
U
R
N
I
T
U
R
E
C
O
D
E
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
F
-
0
1
A
S
S
O
R
T
E
D
P
L
A
N
T
E
R
S
S
F
-
0
2
S
I
T
E
B
E
N
C
H
S
F
-
0
2
B
B
U
I
L
T
-
I
N
S
E
A
T
I
N
G
E
L
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
-
0
3
M
O
V
A
B
L
E
T
A
B
L
E
A
N
D
C
H
A
I
R
S
S
F
-
0
4
B
I
K
E
R
A
C
K
S
F
-
0
5
B
I
K
E
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
A
N
C
E
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
S
F
-
0
6
L
O
U
N
G
E
C
H
A
I
R
S
S
F
-
0
9
C
O
V
E
R
E
D
G
A
S
F
I
R
E
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
W
A
T
E
R
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
C
O
D
E
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
W
F
-
0
1
C
U
S
T
O
M
W
A
T
E
R
F
E
A
T
U
R
E
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
L
E
G
E
N
D
0
f
e
e
t
3
2
1
"
=
1
6
'
1
6
4
8
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
P
L
A
N
L
1
2
0
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
D
A
T
E
T
H
E
C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
T
I
V
E
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
4
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
T
H
E
A
U
T
H
O
R
S
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
T
A
I
N
A
L
L
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
W
,
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
S
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
O
F
T
H
E
A
T
T
A
C
H
E
D
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
.
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
A
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
4
0
1
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
S
U
I
T
E
4
1
0
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
M
N
5
5
4
0
1
T
e
l
6
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
7
5
2
2
S:\2016 Projects\16-244 49 and France\1 CAD\Sheets\L-Hard-Sheets.dwg
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
F
I
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
2
0
6
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
6
1
6
3
1
1
.
0
P
D
V
T
W
H
I
T
L
O
C
K
k
:
\
j
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
E
N
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
K
H
E
N
N
0
6
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
6
S
E
E
C
I
V
I
L
F
O
R
C
R
O
S
S
W
A
L
K
S
S
E
E
C
I
V
I
L
F
O
R
C
R
O
S
S
W
A
L
K
S
D
N
DN
D
N
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
UP
T
R
A
S
H
T
R
A
S
H
S
T
A
I
R
S
T
A
I
R
S
T
A
I
R
STAIR
1
8
N
E
-
F
1
6
N
E
-
F
1
6
N
E
-
F
4
R
H
-
G
2
R
H
-
G
1
0
R
H
-
G
6
R
H
-
G
14 RH-G43 NE-F2 AC-R26 NE-F3 RH-G 3 AC-R
4
G
L
-
T
1
4
R
H
-
G
3
7
N
E
-
F
4
G
L
-
T
4
1
N
E
-
F
9 VINE
2
2
V
I
N
E
6
R
H
-
G
2
A
C
-
R
1
B
E
-
P
3
-
B
E
-
P
6
-
C
A
-
K
3
-
B
E
-
N
3 - BE-N
3
3
-
S
P
-
H
27 - SP-H
5
-
P
A
-
V
9
-
P
A
-
V
3
9
-
T
A
-
M
12 - TA-M19 - VINE 43 - VIN
E
2
1
-
N
E
-
F
8
-
R
H
-
G
D
N
DN
D
N
U
P
U
P
U
P
U
P
UP
T
R
A
S
H
T
R
A
S
H
S
T
A
I
R
S
T
A
I
R
S
T
A
I
R
STAIR
0
f
e
e
t
3
2
1
"
=
1
6
'
1
6
4
8
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
L
1
6
0
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
D
A
T
E
T
H
E
C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
T
I
V
E
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
4
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
T
H
E
A
U
T
H
O
R
S
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
T
A
I
N
A
L
L
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
W
,
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
S
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
O
F
T
H
E
A
T
T
A
C
H
E
D
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
.
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
A
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
4
0
1
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
S
U
I
T
E
4
1
0
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
M
N
5
5
4
0
1
T
e
l
6
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
7
5
2
2
S:\2016 Projects\16-244 49 and France\1 CAD\Sheets\L-Plant-Sheets.dwg
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
F
I
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
2
0
6
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
6
1
6
3
1
1
.
0
P
D
V
T
W
H
I
T
L
O
C
K
k
:
\
j
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
E
N
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
K
H
E
N
N
0
6
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
6
36'-9 1/2
"
1
3
'
-
0
"
5
'
-
7
"
5
'
-
0
"
4
'
-
0
"
1
0
'
-
2
1
/
2
"
12'-5"8'-5"65'-3 1/2"3'-0"7'-3 1/2"30'-6"15'-11"11'-10 1/2"
1
1
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
41'-1"
16'-0"8'-0"8'-0"
D
N
U
P
D
N
U
P
1
2
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
1
2
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
1
1
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
1
1
'
-
5
1
/
2
"
1
2
'
-
1
0
1
/
2
"
1
9
'
-
7
1
/
2
"
4
'
-
6
"
4'-7"5'-4"
16'-0"13'-6"
1
'
-
4
"
1
5
'
-
0
"
4
'
-
0
"
4
'
-
0
"
2
'
-
0
"
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
E
N
L
A
R
G
E
M
E
N
T
S
H
A
R
D
S
C
A
P
E
L
4
1
0
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
D
A
T
E
T
H
E
C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
T
I
V
E
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
4
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
T
H
E
A
U
T
H
O
R
S
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
T
A
I
N
A
L
L
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
W
,
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
S
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
O
F
T
H
E
A
T
T
A
C
H
E
D
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
.
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
A
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
4
0
1
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
S
U
I
T
E
4
1
0
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
M
N
5
5
4
0
1
T
e
l
6
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
7
5
2
2
S:\2016 Projects\16-244 49 and France\1 CAD\Sheets\L-Hard-Sheets.dwg
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
F
I
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
2
0
6
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
6
1
6
3
1
1
.
0
P
D
V
T
W
H
I
T
L
O
C
K
k
:
\
j
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
E
N
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
K
H
E
N
N
0
6
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
6
01WOONERF ENLARGEMENT1" = 8'02PLAZA ENLARGEMENT1" = 5'
H
A
R
D
S
C
A
P
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
L
5
0
0
N
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
N
O
.
D
A
T
E
T
H
E
C
O
L
L
A
B
O
R
T
I
V
E
R
E
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
M
A
R
K
E
T
S
T
R
E
E
T
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
N
5
5
4
2
4
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
D
E
E
M
E
D
T
H
E
A
U
T
H
O
R
S
A
N
D
O
W
N
E
R
S
O
F
T
H
E
I
R
R
E
S
P
E
C
T
I
V
E
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
S
O
F
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
A
N
D
S
H
A
L
L
R
E
T
A
I
N
A
L
L
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
W
,
S
T
A
T
U
T
O
R
Y
A
N
D
O
T
H
E
R
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
S
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
Y
R
I
G
H
T
S
O
F
T
H
E
A
T
T
A
C
H
E
D
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
S
.
C
H
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
C
O
M
P
U
T
E
R
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
:
D
A
T
E
:
D
R
A
W
N
B
Y
:
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
D
A
M
O
N
F
A
R
B
E
R
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
S
4
0
1
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
S
U
I
T
E
4
1
0
M
I
N
N
E
A
P
O
L
I
S
M
N
5
5
4
0
1
T
e
l
6
1
2
.
3
3
2
.
7
5
2
2
S:\2016 Projects\16-244 49 and France\1 CAD\Sheets\ARCHIVE\L-Detail-Sheets.dwg
I
H
E
R
E
B
Y
C
E
R
T
I
F
Y
T
H
A
T
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
N
,
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
R
R
E
P
O
R
T
W
A
S
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
D
B
Y
M
E
O
R
U
N
D
E
R
M
Y
D
I
R
E
C
T
S
U
P
E
R
V
I
S
I
O
N
,
A
N
D
T
H
A
T
I
A
M
A
D
U
L
Y
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
D
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
L
A
W
S
O
F
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
.
F
I
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
2
0
6
/
0
2
/
2
0
1
6
1
6
3
1
1
.
0
P
D
V
T
W
H
I
T
L
O
C
K
k
:
\
j
o
b
s
\
E
d
i
n
a
E
N
T
I
T
L
E
M
E
N
T
K
H
E
N
N
0
6
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
6
P
L
A
N
-
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
P
L
A
N
K
P
A
V
E
R
L
A
Y
O
U
T
1
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
3"
8
"
X
4
8
"
U
N
I
T
P
A
V
E
R
N
O
M
.
S
I
Z
E
S
E
E
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
S
T
A
R
T
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
P
A
V
I
N
G
P
A
T
T
E
R
N
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
T
O
V
E
R
I
F
Y
S
I
Z
E
N
O
T
E
:
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
T
O
V
E
R
I
F
Y
S
T
A
R
T
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
A
L
L
P
A
V
E
R
C
O
U
R
S
E
S
W
I
T
H
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
I
O
R
T
O
C
O
M
M
E
N
C
I
N
G
W
O
R
K
.
L
I
N
E
S
I
N
D
I
C
A
T
E
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
S
O
F
J
O
I
N
T
S
.
L
C
CL
3
/
1
6
"
J
O
I
N
T
C
E
N
T
E
R
L
I
N
E
S
N
.
T
.
S
.
4
'
-
0
"
P
A
T
T
E
R
N
P
O
I
N
T
O
F
B
E
G
I
N
N
I
N
G
P
E
R
P
L
A
N
3
/
1
6
"
S
A
N
D
P
O
L
Y
M
E
R
S
W
E
P
T
J
O
I
N
T
3
"
X
4
8
"
U
N
I
T
P
A
V
E
R
N
O
M
.
S
I
Z
E
S
E
E
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
S
T
A
R
T
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
P
A
V
I
N
G
P
A
T
T
E
R
N
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
T
O
V
E
R
I
F
Y
S
I
Z
E
8"3"
1
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
4
3
"
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
U
N
I
T
P
A
V
E
R
S
,
S
E
T
H
A
N
D
T
I
G
H
T
,
W
/
N
O
.
8
A
G
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
H
A
N
D
S
W
E
P
T
J
O
I
N
T
S
2
"
N
O
.
8
A
G
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
L
E
V
E
L
I
N
G
B
A
S
E
A
G
G
R
E
G
A
T
E
R
E
S
E
R
V
O
I
R
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
S
U
B
G
R
A
D
E
-
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
V
A
R
I
E
S
-
H
O
L
D
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
G
R
A
D
E
1
"
B
E
L
O
W
P
A
V
E
R
S
,
S
E
E
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
G
E
O
T
E
X
T
I
L
E
F
A
B
R
I
C
P
L
A
S
T
I
C
P
A
V
E
R
R
E
S
T
R
A
I
N
T
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
P
E
R
M
E
A
B
L
E
U
N
I
T
P
A
V
I
N
G
1
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
2
2
N
O
T
E
:
1
.
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
T
O
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
S
H
O
P
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
O
F
H
A
N
D
R
A
I
L
C
O
N
F
I
G
U
R
A
T
I
O
N
F
O
R
R
E
V
I
E
W
B
Y
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
I
O
R
T
O
F
A
B
R
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
.
2
.
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
T
O
F
I
E
L
D
V
E
R
I
F
Y
A
L
L
D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
S
A
N
D
A
L
L
O
W
A
B
L
E
M
O
U
N
T
I
N
G
D
E
P
T
H
S
P
R
I
O
R
T
O
F
I
N
A
L
A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L
O
F
S
H
O
P
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
.
1
-
1
/
2
"
S
T
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
P
O
S
T
1
-
1
/
2
"
S
T
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
H
A
N
D
R
A
I
L
P
A
V
I
N
G
P
E
R
P
L
A
N
S
E
M
B
E
D
L
E
N
G
T
H
S
E
T
T
I
N
G
B
E
D
1
/
2
"
S
T
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
&
T
A
P
E
R
E
D
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
P
O
S
T
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
C
O
R
E
1
/
4
"
D
I
A
L
A
R
G
E
R
T
H
A
N
P
O
S
T
W
/
A
N
C
H
O
R
I
N
G
C
E
M
E
N
T
F
L
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
H
A
N
D
R
A
I
L
P
E
R
P
L
A
N
S
8"
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
T
Y
P
I
C
A
L
H
A
N
D
R
A
I
L
M
O
U
N
T
N
T
S
36" STANDARD HEIGHT
4
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
7
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
B
I
K
E
R
A
C
K
1
1
/
2
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
3
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
3
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
D
E
M
O
U
N
T
A
B
L
E
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
I
N
P
A
V
I
N
G
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
2
"
M
I
N
.
6"
1
'
-
9
"
1'-9"
1"
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
R
E
L
E
A
S
E
4
"
O
.
D
.
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
B
O
L
L
A
R
D
E
M
B
E
D
M
E
N
T
S
L
E
E
V
E
A
N
D
H
I
N
G
E
L
I
D
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
V
E
H
I
C
U
L
A
R
P
A
V
I
N
G
P
E
R
P
L
A
N
S
R
E
I
N
F
O
R
C
E
D
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
F
O
O
T
I
N
G
#
4
S
T
I
R
R
U
P
S
@
1
2
"
O
.
C
.
(
4
)
#
4
L
O
N
G
G
R
A
V
E
L
S
U
M
P
5
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
0
5
7
9
°
1'-6"6"
1
0
9
°
R
1
"
1'-0"1'-6"
2
'
-
2
"
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
-
B
U
I
L
T
I
N
B
E
N
C
H
1
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
P
A
V
I
N
G
P
A
V
I
N
G
5"
S
E
A
T
W
/
O
B
A
C
K
4
"
W
I
D
E
P
L
A
N
T
E
R
W
A
L
L
T
R
E
E
R
O
O
T
B
A
L
L
O
V
E
R
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
2
"
D
I
A
.
D
R
A
I
N
L
I
N
E
A
R
L
E
D
L
I
G
H
T
S
T
R
I
P
S
E
A
T
W
I
T
H
B
A
C
K
2
%
S
L
O
P
E
T
O
D
R
A
I
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
B
E
L
O
W
R
E
:
A
R
C
H
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
B
E
L
O
W
R
E
:
A
R
C
H
6
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
5
ELEVATION - DECORATIVE FENCE3/4" = 1'-0"6' - 0"VARIES - SEE PLAN4" MAX GAP AT BASE
2
"
D
I
A
M
E
T
E
R
M
E
T
A
L
P
O
L
E
S
3
"
M
I
N
E
R
A
L
M
U
L
C
H
C
O
V
E
R
O
V
E
R
B
A
S
E
P
L
A
T
E
7
P
-
1
6
2
4
4
-
1
1
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
0
-
C
o
v
e
r
S
h
e
e
t
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C0.0
COVER SHEET
NORTH
VICINITY
N.T.S.SITE
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE
DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A 30" X 42" SHEET.
3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES
COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION
OF SERVICES.
4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY
THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.
NOTES:
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
PROJECT TEAM:
SURVEYORENGINEER
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
PREPARED BY: DAN ELENBAAS, PE & TRISHA SIEH, PE
2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W, SUITE 238 N
ST. PAUL, MN 55114
TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197
TELEPHONE (651) 643-0470
OWNER / DEVELOPER
BUHL INVESTORS
5100 EDEN AVENUE
SUITE 317
EDINA MN, 55346
TELEPHONE (612) 968-3728
CONTACT: PETER DEANOVIC
THE COLLABORATIVE REDEVELOPMENT
SEC. 18, TWP. 28N , RNG. 24W
FOR
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Know what's
R
ARCHITECT
SATURDAY PROPERTIES
1400 VAN BUREN STREET NE
SUITE 200 - 202
MINNEAPOLIS MN, 55413
TELEPHONE (612) 419-6680
CONTACT: BRENT ROGERS
1000 Twelve Oaks
Center Dr.
Suite 200
Wayzata MN 55391Tel 952.426.7400
Fax 952.426.7440
CONTACT: TODD NOVAK
401 2nd Avenue North, Suite 410
Minneapolis, MN 55401
p 612.332.7522
CONTACT: MARK HANSON
CONTACT: KEVIN HENN
SITE
CIVIL SHEET LIST
Sheet Number Sheet Title
C0.0 COVER SHEET
C1.0 GENERAL NOTES
C2.0 DEMOLITION PLAN
C3.0 SWPPP NOTES
C3.1 PHASE I EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C3.2 PHASE II EROSION CONTROL PLAN
C4.0 CIVIL SITE PLAN
C4.1 TRUCK MOVEMENT PLAN
C4.2 ADA AND SIGN PLAN
C5.0 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
C6.0 UTILITY PLAN
C7.0 CIVIL DETAILS
C7.1 CIVIL DETAILS
C7.2 CIVIL DETAILS
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION"
(LATEST EDITION) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE CONTENTS PRIOR TO COMMENCING
WORK, AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM AS APPLICABLE TO
THESE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FURNISHING ALL MATERIAL AND LABOR
TO CONSTRUCT THE FACILITY AS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONSTRUCTION
DOCUMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE APPROVING AUTHORITIES,
SPECIFICATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL
AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, REMOVING TREES, STUMPS, ROOTS, MUCK,
EXISTING PAVEMENT AND ALL OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL.
3. THE EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS QUALITY LEVEL "D"
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TO THE
GUIDELINES OF CI/ACSE 38/02, ENTITLED STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION
AND DEPICTION OF SUBSURFACE QUALITY DATA BY THE FHA. EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN
ARE LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO THE ENGINEER AT THE
TIME OF THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY
THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. GUARANTEE IS NOT MADE THAT ALL EXISTING
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN OR THAT THE LOCATION OF THOSE SHOWN ARE
ENTIRELY ACCURATE. FINDING THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF ANY EXISTING UTILITIES IS THE
CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY AND SHALL BE DONE BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK
IN THE VICINITY. FURTHERMORE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR
ANY AND ALL DAMAGES DUE TO THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND
PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE OWNER OR ENGINEER WILL
ASSUME NO LIABILITY FOR ANY DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR COST INCURRED BECAUSE OF
THE OPERATIONS IN THE VICINITY OF EXISTING UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES, NOR FOR
TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING OF SAME. IF IT IS NECESSARY TO SHORE, BRACE,
SWING OR RELOCATE A UTILITY, THE UTILITY COMPANY OR DEPARTMENT AFFECTED
SHALL BE CONTACTED AND THEIR PERMISSION OBTAINED REGARDING THE METHOD TO
USE FOR SUCH WORK.
4. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT THE VARIOUS UTILITY
COMPANIES WHICH MAY HAVE BURIED OR AERIAL UTILITIES WITHIN OR NEAR THE
CONSTRUCTION AREA BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE
48 HOURS MINIMUM NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO BEGINNING
CONSTRUCTION.
5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED
CONSTRUCTION PERMITS AND BONDS IF REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE AVAILABLE AT THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES ONE COPY OF
THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, GEOTECHNICAL
REPORT AND SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND COPIES OF ANY REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS.
7. ANY DISCREPANCIES ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE
ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. NO FIELD
CHANGES OR DEVIATIONS FROM DESIGN ARE TO BE MADE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL
OF THE OWNER AND NOTIFICATION TO THE ENGINEER.
8. ALL COPIES OF COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND OTHER REQUIRED TEST RESULTS ARE TO
BE SENT TO THE OWNER DIRECTLY FROM THE TESTING AGENCY.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTING AND MAINTAINING
AS-BUILT INFORMATION WHICH SHALL BE RECORDED AS CONSTRUCTION PROGRESSES
OR AT THE COMPLETION OF APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION INTERVALS AND SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AS-BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE OWNER FOR THE PURPOSE
OF CERTIFICATION TO JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES AS REQUIRED. ALL AS-BUILT DATA
SHALL BE COLLECTED BY A STATE OF MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
WHOSE SERVICES ARE ENGAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR.
10. ANY WELLS DISCOVERED ON SITE THAT WILL HAVE NO USE MUST BE PLUGGED BY A
LICENSED WELL DRILLING CONTRACTOR IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL
JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY
WELL ABANDONMENT PERMITS REQUIRED.
11. ANY WELL DISCOVERED DURING EARTH MOVING OR EXCAVATION SHALL BE REPORTED
TO THE APPROPRIATE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCIES WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER DISCOVERY IS
MADE.
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING THAT THE PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFLICT WITH ANY KNOWN EXISTING
OR OTHER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. IF ANY CONFLICTS ARE DISCOVERED, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PORTION OF
THE SITE WORK THAT WOULD BE AFFECTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OWNER OF AN
IDENTIFIABLE CONFLICT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH INSTALLATION RELIEVES OWNER
OF ANY OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR A RELATED CHANGE ORDER.
13. SHOULD CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTER ANY DEBRIS LADEN SOIL, STRUCTURES NOT
IDENTIFIED IN THE DOCUMENTS, OR OTHER SOURCE OF POTENTIAL CONTAMINATION,
THEY SHALL IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER.
TYPICAL OWNER/ENGINEER OBSERVATIONS
CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY OWNER AND/OR ENGINEER 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE
FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES:
- PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, BASE INSTALLATION
ASPHALT INSTALLATION, UNDERGROUND PIPING AND UTILITIES INSTALLATION,
INSTALLATION OF STRUCTURES, CHECK VALVES, HYDRANTS, METERS, ETC., SIDEWALK
INSTALLATION, CONNECTIONS TO WATER AND SEWER MAINS, TESTS OF UTILITIES
3RD PARTY TEST REPORTS REQ'D
TEST REPORTS REQUIRED FOR CLOSE OUT INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO:
- DENSITY TEST REPORTS
- BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTS OF WATER SYSTEM
- PRESSURE TEST OF WATER/SEWER
- LEAK TESTS ON SEWER SYSTEM AND GREASE TRAPS
- ANY OTHER TESTING REQUIRED BY THE AGENCY/MUNICIPALITY
WATER, STORM SEWER, AND SANITARY SEWER NOTES
1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT GRAVITY SEWER LATERALS, MANHOLES, GRAVITY SEWER LINES, AND
DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH
ALL NECESSARY MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TOOLS, MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION AND LABOR
NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN FULL AND COMPLETE ACCORDANCE WITH THE SHOWN, DESCRIBED AND
REASONABLY INTENDED REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY
REQUIREMENTS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY
REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.
2. ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY
WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY LOCATION AND COORDINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NOTES CONTAINED
IN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SECTION OF THIS SHEET.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL DISTURBED VEGETATION IN KIND, UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE.
4. DEFLECTION OF PIPE JOINTS AND CURVATURE OF PIPE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS.
SECURELY CLOSE ALL OPEN ENDS OF PIPE AND FITTINGS WITH A WATERTIGHT PLUG WHEN WORK IS NOT IN
PROGRESS. THE INTERIOR OF ALL PIPES SHALL BE CLEAN AND JOINT SURFACES WIPED CLEAN AND DRY AFTER THE
PIPE HAS BEEN LOWERED INTO THE TRENCH. VALVES SHALL BE PLUMB AND LOCATED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS.
5. ALL PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE CAREFULLY STORED FOLLOWING MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CARE
SHALL BE TAKEN TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THE COATING OR LINING IN ANY D.I. PIPE FITTINGS. ANY PIPE OR FITTING
WHICH IS DAMAGED OR WHICH HAS FLAWS OR IMPERFECTIONS WHICH, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER OR
OWNER, RENDERS IT UNFIT FOR USE, SHALL NOT BE USED. ANY PIPE NOT SATISFACTORY FOR USE SHALL BE
CLEARLY MARKED AND IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE, AND SHALL BE REPLACED AT THE
CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
6. WATER FOR FIRE FIGHTING SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO COMBUSTIBLES
BEING BROUGHT ON SITE.
7. ALL UTILITY AND STORM DRAIN TRENCHES LOCATED UNDER AREAS TO RECEIVE PAVING SHALL BE COMPLETELY
BACK FILLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GOVERNING JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY'S SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT
THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE
MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.
8. UNDERGROUND LINES SHALL BE SURVEYED BY A STATE OF MINNESOTA PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PRIOR TO
BACK FILLING.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ANY AND ALL TESTS REQUIRED BY THE SPECIFICATIONS
AND/OR ANY AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION. THESE TESTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT MAY NOT BE LIMITED TO, INFILTRATION
AND EXFILTRATION, TELEVISION INSPECTION AND A MANDREL TEST ON GRAVITY SEWER. A COPY OF THE TEST
RESULTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE UTILITY PROVIDER, OWNER AND JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE OF 10' AND A VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 18"
BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER MANHOLES AND LINES.
11. IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS
RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING
CONDITIONS OR BETTER.
12. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS
WATERTIGHT UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED BY CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
13. UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN CITY AND STATE DESIGN STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ALL STORM SEWER
MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS.
MANHOLES IN UNPAVED AREAS SHALL BE 6" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. LIDS SHALL BE LABELED "STORM SEWER".
EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MEET THESE CONDITIONS
AND THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE.
14. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR
DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO
THE OWNER FOR REVIEW.
15. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME.
16. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT.
17. ROOF DRAINS SHALL BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER BY PREFABRICATED WYES OR AT STORM STRUCTURES.
ROOF DRAINS AND TRUCK WELL DRAIN SHALL RUN AT A MINIMUM 1% SLOPE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, AND TIE IN
AT THE CENTERLINE OF THE STORM MAIN.
18. ALL ROOF AND SANITARY SEWER DRAINS SHALL BE INSULATED IF 7.5' OF COVER CANNOT BE PROVIDED.
19. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES THAT ARE TO REMAIN
FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS.
20. THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURES AND OTHER ABOVE AND BELOW-GRADE
IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE AS SHOWN. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE
EXACT LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT ELEVATIONS OF EACH PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION.
21. A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION IS REQUIRED BETWEEN UTILITIES AND TREES UNLESS A ROOT BARRIER IS UTILIZED.
22. GAS, PHONE AND ELECTRIC SERVICES SHOWN FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. DRY UTILITY COMPANIES MAY
ALTER THE DESIGN LAYOUT DURING THEIR REVIEW. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL DESIGN AND INSTALLATION
WITH UTILITY COMPANIES.
23. COORDINATE UTILITY INSTALLATION WITH IRRIGATION DESIGN AND INSTALLATION.
24. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FLOW LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PERIMETER WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO
INSIDE WALL FACE. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT WALL WIDTH AND SPECIFICATIONS.
25. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS). FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS, AND MATERIALS
SPECIFICATIONS.
26. REFERENCE M.E.P. PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
27. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE STRUCTURAL PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT DIMENSIONS AND
PAD PREPARATION SPECIFICATIONS.
28. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE M.E.P PLANS (BY OTHERS) FOR LIGHT POLE WIRING.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES
1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY THE SUITABILITY OF ALL
EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS INCLUDING GRADES AND DIMENSIONS BEFORE
START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL ADJUST
BMP'S AS NECESSARY AND REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL
UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THERE IS POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS
SO THAT SURFACE RUNOFF WILL DRAIN BY GRAVITY TO NEW OR EXISTING DRAINAGE OUTLETS.
CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE NO PONDING OCCURS IN PAVED AREAS AND SHALL NOTIFY
ENGINEER IF ANY GRADING DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND IN THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
GRADES PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT OR UTILITIES.
4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL MANHOLE COVERS, VALVE COVERS, VAULT LIDS, FIRE
HYDRANTS, POWER POLES, GUY WIRES, AND TELEPHONE BOXES THAT ARE TO REMAIN IN
PLACE AND UNDISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. EXISTING CASTINGS AND STRUCTURES TO
REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO MATCH THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADES.
5. BACKFILL FOR UTILITY LINES SHALL BE PLACED PER DETAILS, STANDARDS, AND
SPECIFICATIONS SO THAT THE UTILITY WILL BE STABLE. WHERE UTILITY LINES CROSS THE
PARKING LOT, THE TOP 6 INCHES SHALL BE COMPACTED SIMILARLY TO THE REMAINDER OF THE
LOT. UTILITY DITCHES SHALL BE VISUALLY INSPECTED DURING THE EXCAVATION PROCESS TO
ENSURE THAT UNDESIRABLE FILL IS NOT USED.
6. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF 4" OF TOPSOIL AT
COMPLETION OF WORK. ALL UNPAVED AREAS IN EXISTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY DISTURBED BY
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REGRADED AND SODDED.
7. AFTER PLACEMENT OF SUBGRADE AND PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR
SHALL TEST AND OBSERVE PAVEMENT AREAS FOR EVIDENCE OF PONDING. ALL AREAS SHALL
ADEQUATELY DRAIN TOWARDS THE INTENDED STRUCTURE TO CONVEY STORM RUNOFF.
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE
DISCOVERED.
8. WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUT FULL DEPTH FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE
THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PROTECTION OVER ALL DRAINAGE STRUCTURES FOR THE
DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT BY THE OWNER. ALL
DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLEANED OF DEBRIS AS REQUIRED DURING AND AT THE
END OF CONSTRUCTION TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE FLOWS.
10. IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY APPLICABLE REQUIRED
PERMITS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH THE OWNER AND THE DESIGN ENGINEER
PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.
11. FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL
JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY OR TO MNDOT STANDARDS. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE
MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN.
12. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED AS PER PLANS.
THE AREAS SHALL THEN BE SODDED OR SEEDED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANS, FERTILIZED,
MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL
AREAS. ANY AREAS DISTURBED FOR ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE JOB
SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. ALL
EARTHEN AREAS WILL BE SODDED OR SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SHOWN ON THE
LANDSCAPING PLAN.
13. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTROL OF DUST AND DIRT RISING AND
SCATTERING IN THE AIR DURING CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL PROVIDE WATER SPRINKLING OR
OTHER SUITABLE METHODS OF CONTROL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL
GOVERNING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.
14. SOD, WHERE CALLED FOR, MUST BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ON EXPOSED SLOPES WITHIN
48 HOURS OF COMPLETING FINAL GRADING, AND AT ANY OTHER TIME AS NECESSARY, TO
PREVENT EROSION, SEDIMENTATION OR TURBID DISCHARGES.
15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT LANDSCAPE ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER
PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL
AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER.
16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL UNDERGROUND STORM WATER PIPING PER
MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AND MNDOT SPECIFICATION.
17. ALL CONCRETE/ASPHALT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER GEOTECH REPORT, CITY OF EDINA AND
MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS.
18. SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO FLOWLINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
19. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ARE TO THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON
THE PLAN.
20. IMMEDIATELY REPORT TO THE OWNER ANY DISCREPANCIES FOUND BETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD
CONDITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
21. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING EXISTING UTILITIES, AND
SHALL REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO EXISTING UTILITIES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION
WITHOUT COMPENSATION.
22. BLEND NEW EARTHWORK SMOOTHLY TO TRANSITION BACK TO EXISTING GRADE.
23. ALL PROPOSED GRADES ONSITE SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON
THE PLANS. ANY SLOPES STEEPER THAN 4:1 REQUIRE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
BLANKET.
24. ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN THE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT
AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE
ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
25. ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND
CONTINUOUS GRADE.
26. CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE MINIMUM GRADES ARE MET WITHIN PAVED AREAS, 1.2% FOR
ASPHALT PAVING AND 0.6% FOR CONCRETE PAVING.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES
1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THE EROSION
CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN
THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND
RELATED DOCUMENTS.
2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORM WATER POLLUTION
PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN
AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS.
3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL,
STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING
AGENCY OR OWNER.
4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILL PREVENT
THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED,
DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ON A PUBLIC ROADWAY MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.
WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC
ROADWAY, IT SHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS
INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ALL FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT
ONTO PUBLIC AREAS SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR.
5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED
WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS
REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA
WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA,
EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE
TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES.
8. ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.)
SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED.
9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE
MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL
SPILLS AND LEAKS.
10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OF MOTOR
OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION
OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED.
11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO
SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES
THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR
WATERS OF THE STATE.
12. ALL STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THE PLAN SHALL BE
INITIATED AS SOON AS IS PRACTICABLE.
13. ALL STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY WILL
NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT STORM WATER QUALITY. OTHERWISE, COVERING OR ENCIRCLING
THESE AREAS WITH SOME PROTECTIVE MEASURE WILL BE NECESSARY.
14. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROL
DEVICE WHICH THEY DISTURB. EACH CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE OWNER'S
REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OR STORM WATER POLLUTION,
SEDIMENTATION, OR OTHER POLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE
NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESS CONCRETE DUMPING OR CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS,
GREASES, FUEL AND LUBRICANT OIL, PESTICIDES, AND ANY SOLID WASTE MATERIALS.
15. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE
START OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT.
16. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. CHANGES ARE TO BE APPROVED
BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND THE CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING
DIVISION.
17. IF THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN AS APPROVED CANNOT CONTROL EROSION AND OFF-SITE
SEDIMENTATION FROM THE PROJECT, THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN WILL HAVE TO BE
REVISED AND/OR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES WILL BE REQUIRED ON SITE. ANY
REVISIONS TO THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN MADE BY THE CONTRACTOR MUST BE
APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.
EROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE
ALL MEASURES STATED ON THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY
FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AS REQUIRED BY ALL JURISDICTIONS UNTIL NO LONGER
REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE.
ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A
CERTIFIED PERSON AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF
THE END OF A 0.5" RAINFALL EVENT, AND CLEANED AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE FOLLOWING:
INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED IF THEY
SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING, OR DETERIORATION.
1. ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS
MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED.
FOR MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS REFER TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS.
2. SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED.
SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES
ONE-THIRD THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE.
3. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE(S) SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH
WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS
MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AS
CONDITIONS DEMAND.
4. THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION
(SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP
DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND.
5. ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE IN A TIMELY MANNER BUT IN NO
CASE LATER THAN 2 CALENDAR DAYS FOLLOWING THE INSPECTION.
PAVING AND STRIPING NOTES
1. ALL PAVING, CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND WORKMANSHIP WITHIN JURISDICTION'S
RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL OR COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS AND
STANDARDS (LATEST EDITION) OR MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS (LATEST
EDITION) IF NOT COVERED BY LOCAL OR COUNTY REGULATIONS.
2. ALL SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM
TO MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (M.U.T.C.D) AND CITY STANDARDS.
3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS FOR FIRE LANES, ROADWAY LANES,
PARKING STALLS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOLS, ACCESS AISLES, STOP BARS AND SIGNS,
AND MISCELLANEOUS STRIPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
4. ALL EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE CURB.
5. THE MINIMUM LENGTH OF OFFSET JOINTS AT RADIUS POINTS SHALL BE 2 FEET.
6. ALL JOINTS, INCLUDING EXPANSION JOINTS WITH REMOVABLE TACK STRIPS, SHALL BE
SEALED WITH JOINT SEALANT.
7. THE MATERIALS AND PROPERTIES OF ALL CONCRETE SHALL MEET THE APPLICABLE
REQUIREMENTS IN THE A.C.I. (AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE) MANUAL OF CONCRETE
PRACTICE.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY A SECOND COATING OVER ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS PRIOR TO
ACCEPTANCE BY OWNER FOLLOWED BY A COAT OF GLASS BEADS AS APPLICABLE PER THE
PROJECT DOCUMENTS.
9. ANY EXISTING PAVEMENT, CURBS AND/OR SIDEWALKS DAMAGED OR REMOVED WILL BE
REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER
AND OWNER.
10. BEFORE PLACING PAVEMENT, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SUITABLE ACCESSIBLE ROUTES
(PER A.D.A). GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING
DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE
SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE
SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK
SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2%
(1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND
GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF
ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR
CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES.
11. MAXIMUM JOINT SPACING IS TWICE THE DEPTH OF THE CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN FEET.
REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT NO. B1700946
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION
MINNEAPOLIS, MN
DATED MARCH 13, 2017
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
1
-
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
N
o
t
e
s
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C1.0
GENERAL NOTES
A
B
A
A
BBB
B
CC
A
A
BB
B
B
BB
AA AA AAAA AAA AA AAAAAA
B
CCC
CC
DD
DDD
E
E
E
E E
F
F
F
F
F
F F
F
F
E EEE E
REMOVE EXISTING STORM PIPE
TO MANHOLE
EXISTING CURB TO BE
REPLACED & MATCH EXISTING.
SAWCUT PAVEMENT &
PROTECT EXISTING
BUILDING TO THE SOUTH
SAWCUT PAVEMENT &
PROTECT EXISTING
BUILDING TO THE SOUTH
PROTECT EXISTING
TREES ALONG BACK
PROPERTY LINE
PROTECT EXISTING
TREES ALONG BACK
PROPERTY LINE
PROTECT EXISTING
TREES ALONG BACK
PROPERTY LINE
PROTECT EXISTING STORM
STRUCTURE.
REMOVE STORM PIPE UP TO
EXISTING MANHOLE & PLUG
HOLE IN EXISTING STRUCTURE.
PROTECT EXISTING
STORM STRUCTURE.
REMOVE STORM PIPE UP
TO EXISTING MANHOLE &
PLUG HOLE IN EXISTING
STRUCTURE.
EAST ALLEY TO REMAIN
ACCESSIBLE DURING
CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING
BUSINESSES. ALLEY TO BE
REPLACED & RE-SURFACED
DURING PROJECT.
PROTECT EXISTING
PMH SWITCH
PROTECT EXISTING
PMH SWITCH
PROTECT EXISTING
BUILDINGS
PROTECT EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
PROTECT EXISTING
TRANSFORMER
PROTECT EXISTING
BUILDINGS
PROTECT EXISTING
BUILDINGS
CONTRACTOR TO
MAINTAIN 10' ACCESS
TO EXISTING BUILDINGS
RELOCATE EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
REMOVE EXISTING
RETAINING WALL
REMOVE EXISTING
RETAINING WALL
PATCH EXISTING
PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY
PATCH EXISTING
PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY
PATCH EXISTING
PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY
ADJUST EXISTING
CASTING.
MILL AND
OVERLAY
MILL AND
OVERLAY
E
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
REMOVE PAVER SURFACE
REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE
REMOVE BUILDING
REMOVE TREE
REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
REMOVE UTILITY LINES
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE
EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE
EXISTING J-BARRIER
EXISTING RETAINING WALL
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING STORM SEWER
EXISTING WATERMAIN
EXISTING GAS MAIN
EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE
EXISTING CONTOUR
EXISTING SIGN
EXISTING STORM MANHOLE
EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN
EXISTING GAS METER
EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE
EXISTING WELL
EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
EXISTING ROOF DRAIN
EXISTING GATE VALVE
LEGEND
CLEARING & GRUBBING
FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES
EXISTING CURB & GUTTER
REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE
SAWCUT EXISTING PAVEMENT
SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR TRANSPLANTS
EXISTING HYDRANT
EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER
EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER
EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE
EXISTING CABLE BOX
EXISTING GUY WIRE
EXISTING POWER POLE
EXISTING LIGHT POLE
EXISTING TREE
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
2
-
D
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C2.0
DEMOLITION
PLAN
1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A
LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS,
FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH
THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE
REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH
SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.
2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND
DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE
OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT
ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR
THE CITY.
4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO
THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE
WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED
BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY
COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES
AND CHARGES.
5. THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED
FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE
CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR
TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY
COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED
WORK.
6. ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE
EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING
CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE
NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL
SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK.
7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE
REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY.
ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH
THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY
SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY
ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.
8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES,
ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS
APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL
BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY AND MNDOT.
9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING
CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR
ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION.
10. PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE
INSTALLED.
11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS
WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS
INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR.
12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE
CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE
ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS
SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH
THE CITY OF EDINA DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN
SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA
COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED.
13. REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS.
14. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES.
15. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND
OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MINNESOTA REQUIREMENTS.
16. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE
IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE
PROJECT DOCUMENTS.
17. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED
ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE
ENGINEER.
DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES KEYNOTE LEGEND
REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO CITY OF EDINA
REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN TO CITY OF EDINA
REMOVE EXISTING FENCE
REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALL
SAWCUT AND REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
A.PROJECT OFFICE WALL SWPPP POSTINGS:
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE POSTED TOGETHER IN A SINGLE,
ORGANIZED LOCATION ON A WALL INSIDE THE PROJECT OFFICE: 1) SWPPP
SITE MAPS (ALL PHASES); 2) SWPPP DETAIL SHEETS; 3) MAP SHOWING
LOCATION OF OFFSITE IMPORT OR EXPORT FACILITY; 4) REVISIONS TO
DETAILS, SITE MAPS, OR SWPPP-RELATED RFIS; 5) SITE SWPPP BINDER; 6) SWCT
PLACARD; 7) CURRENT OWNER STORMWATER COMPLIANCE TRAINING
CERTIFICATES FOR SUPERINTENDENT(S) AND COMPLIANCE OFFICER(S); AND
8) CERTIFICATIONS AND/OR TRAINING CERTIFICATES REQUIRED TO PERFORM
INSPECTIONS BY THE APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT OR
AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. FOR ALL SWPPP INSPECTION REPORTS
COPY KEVIN THOMSEN AT KEVIN THOMSEN@WOODBURYMN.GOV AT THE
CITY OF WOODBURY.
B. PERMITTED PROJECT AREA:
FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SWPPP AND ASSOCIATED STORMWATER PERMIT,
'PERMITTED PROJECT AREA' IS DEFINED AS ANY AND ALL AREAS WITHIN THE
PROJECT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, AS SHOWN ON THE SWPPP SITE MAPS AND
IDENTIFIED IN THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO THE AGENCY. ALL
GROUND-DISTURBING AND CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACTIVITIES (MATERIAL
STORAGE, DUMPSTERS, PARKING AREAS, PROJECT OFFICE TRAILER, ETC.)
MUST BE INCLUDED WITHIN THE PERMITTED PROJECT AREA LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE.
ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PERMITTED PROJECT AREA (I.E., LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE) ACQUIRED FOR USE BY THE GC OR A SUBCONTRACTOR OF
THE GC (BORROW SOURCES, DISPOSAL AREAS, ETC.) MUST BE MANAGED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPDES PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO
LOCATE OFFICE TRAILERS AND MATERIAL STORAGE AREAS FOR THE PROJECT
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. THE CONTRACTOR MAY REQUEST USE
OF OFF-SITE LOCATIONS FOR OFFICE TRAILERS OR NON-ERODIBLE MATERIAL
STORAGE; HOWEVER, APPROVAL MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER, AND THE CEC PRIOR TO THEIR USE. REQUESTS
WILL BE REVIEWED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS AND IF APPROVED,
LIMITATIONS ON USE WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CEC.
C. SPECIAL PROJECT AREAS:
THERE ARE NO SPECIAL PROJECTS, LOCATED BEYOND THE OWNER
PERMITTED PROJECT AREA, REQUIRING INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE
ASSOCIATED WITH THIS CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
D.1 NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES:
THE GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH
CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES PROHIBITS MOST NON-STORMWATER
DISCHARGES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE. ALLOWABLE
NON-STORMWATER DISCHARGES THAT OCCUR DURING CONSTRUCTION ON
THIS PROJECT, ARE INCLUDED IN THE SECTION PART IV.D. OF THE GENERAL
PERMIT.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) MUST BE IMPLEMENTED FOR THE
GENERAL PERMIT ALLOWABLE DISCHARGES FOR THE DURATION OF THE
PERMIT. THE TECHNIQUES DESCRIBED IN THIS SWPPP FOCUS ON PROVIDING
CONTROL OF POLLUTANT DISCHARGES WITH PRACTICAL APPROACHES THAT
UTILIZE READILY AVAILABLE EXPERTISE, MATERIAL, AND EQUIPMENT.
NON-STORMWATER COMPONENTS OF SITE DISCHARGES MUST BE
UNCONTAMINATED NON-TURBID WATER. ALL NON-STORMWATER
DISCHARGES MUST BE ROUTED TO A STORMWATER CONTROL PRIOR TO
DISCHARGE. WATER USED FOR CONSTRUCTION WHICH DISCHARGES FROM
THE SITE MUST ORIGINATE FROM A PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY OR PRIVATE WELL
APPROVED BY THE STATE HEALTH DEPARTMENT. WATER USED FOR
CONSTRUCTION THAT DOES NOT ORIGINATE FROM AN APPROVED PUBLIC
SUPPLY MUST NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE; IT CAN BE RETAINED IN
RETENTION PONDS UNTIL IT INFILTRATES OR EVAPORATES. WHEN
NON-STORMWATER IS DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE, IT MUST BE DONE IN A
MANNER SUCH THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OF THE SOIL DURING
DISCHARGE.
D.2 POWER WASHING:
PROCESS WATER SUCH AS POWER WASHING WATER AND CONCRETE CUTTING
EFFLUENT, AMONG OTHERS, MUST BE COLLECTED FOR TREATMENT AND
DISPOSAL. IT MUST NOT BE FLUSHED INTO THE SITE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
OR DISCHARGED OFF-SITE.
D. DISCHARGE POINTS:
ALL DISCHARGE POINTS MUST BE INSPECTED TO DETERMINE WHETHER
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES ARE EFFECTIVE IN
PREVENTING DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT FROM THE SITE AND/OR IMPACTS TO
RECEIVING WATERS. SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION DOWNGRADIENT OF
DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE REPORTED AS A SEDIMENT DISCHARGE
AND THE POTENTIAL UPSTREAM CAUSE SHALL BE INVESTIGATED TO
PREVENT FUTURE OCCURRENCE. CONTACT THE CM AND CEC TO DETERMINE
APPROPRIATE ACTION FOR CLEANUP OF DISCHARGED SEDIMENT THAT MAY
BE OUTSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. SEE SAMPLING AND
MONITORING OF EFFLUENT PLAN (IF APPLICABLE).
A. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS
REQUIRED BY THIS STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN.
ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS
DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OF OWNER
THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION.
B. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM
TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE,
AS APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS
AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER.
C. SITE MAP MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS. PERMITS FOR
ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED
WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES.
D. SUBCONTRACTOR TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF SITE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE
WITH SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE, OR AS REQUIRED BY THE
APPLICABLE GENERAL PERMIT. NO UNNECESSARY OR IMPROPERLY
SEQUENCED CLEARING AND/OR GRADING SHALL BE PERMITTED.
E. ALL DENUDED/BARE AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE,
MUST BE STABILIZED IMMEDIATELY UPON COMPLETION OF MOST RECENT
GRADING ACTIVITY, WITH THE USE OF FAST-GERMINATING ANNUAL
GRASS/GRAIN VARIETIES, STRAW/HAY MULCH, WOOD CELLULOSE FIBERS,
TACKIFIERS, NETTING AND/OR BLANKETS. COMPLETION MUST BE
ACHIEVED WITHIN 14 DAYS.
F. DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS
PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AS SHOWN
ON THE PLANS. THESE AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED, SODDED, AND/OR
VEGETATED IMMEDIATELY, AND COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS
AFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE AREAS.
REFER TO THE GRADING PLAN AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLAN.
G. SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING
PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. TEMPORARY
AND/OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION SHALL BE APPLIED PER
REQUIREMENTS IN THESE E&S CONTROL NOTES.
H. DUE TO THE GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT,
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION
AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, ETC.) TO PREVENT
EROSION AND POLLUTANT DISCHARGE OFF-SITE.
I. ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS SITE MAP, AND IN THE STORM WATER
POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY
FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED
PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND
SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A QUALIFIED
PERSON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR THE
APPLICABLE PERMIT, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT, AND REPAIRED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SITE PLANS.
J. STORM WATER POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURES INSTALLED DURING
CONSTRUCTION, THAT WILL ALSO PROVIDE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
AFTER CONSTRUCTION, ARE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE
SITE-SPECIFIC POST CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE (O&M) MANUAL IS INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT
DOCUMENTS.
K. ALL PERMANENT CONTROLS AND SYSTEMS MUST BE INSTALLED AND
FUNCTIONING AS DESIGNED AND FREE OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND
DEBRIS DURING FINAL PROJECT INSPECTION AND APPROVAL.
ANY HAZARDOUS OR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS MATERIAL THAT IS BROUGHT
ONTO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE HANDLED PROPERLY TO REDUCE THE
POTENTIAL FOR STORMWATER POLLUTION. ALL MATERIALS USED ON THIS
CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL BE PROPERLY STORED, HANDLED, DISPENSED AND
DISPOSED OF FOLLOWING ALL APPLICABLE LABEL DIRECTIONS. FLAMMABLE
AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS SHALL BE STORED AND HANDLED ACCORDING TO
APPLICABLE REGULATIONS, AND, AT A MINIMUM, ACCORDING TO 29 CFR 1926.152.
ONLY APPROVED CONTAINERS AND PORTABLE TANKS SHALL BE USED FOR
STORAGE AND HANDLING OF FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS.
MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (MSDS) INFORMATION SHALL BE KEPT ON SITE
FOR ANY AND ALL APPLICABLE MATERIALS. HOWEVER, MSDS MAY ALSO BE
ACCESSED VIA TELEPHONE OR OTHER ELECTRONIC MEANS OR APPARATUS.
IN THE EVENT OF AN ACCIDENTAL SPILL, IMMEDIATE ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN
BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR TO CONTAIN AND REMOVE THE SPILLED MATERIAL.
THE SPILL SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE APPROPRIATE AGENCIES IN THE
REQUIRED TIME FRAMES. AS REQUIRED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE CLEAN
WATER ACT, ANY SPILL OR DISCHARGE ENTERING WATERS OF THE UNITED
STATES SHALL BE PROPERLY REPORTED.
ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, INCLUDING CONTAMINATED SOIL AND LIQUID
CONCRETE WASTE, SHALL BE DISPOSED OF BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR IN THE
MANNER SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS AND BY THE
MANUFACTURER OF SUCH PRODUCTS.
THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A WRITTEN RECORD OF ANY SPILL AND
ASSOCIATED CLEAN-UP ACTIVITIES OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OR HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS IN EXCESS OF 1 GALLON OR REPORTABLE QUANTITIES, WHICHEVER IS
LESS, ON THE DAY OF THE SPILL. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NOTICE
TO OWNER, VIA THE ONLINE CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORT, IMMEDIATELY UPON
IDENTIFICATION OF ANY SPILL. SPILL REPORT FORMS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE
ONLINE SWPPP REPORTING SYSTEM PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. COPIES OF SPILL
CRITICAL INCIDENT REPORTS SHALL BE PRINTED AND MAINTAINED IN THE
JOBSITE BINDER.
ANY SPILLS OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS OR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IN EXCESS OF
REPORTABLE QUANTITIES AS DEFINED BY EPA OR THE STATE OR LOCAL AGENCY
REGULATIONS, SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPORTED TO THE EPA NATIONAL
RESPONSE CENTER (1-800-424-8802) AND THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES (1-800-943-0003)
THE STATE REQUIRES REPORTING WHEN:
•THERE IS AN IMPACT TO HUMAN HEALTH
•THERE IS AN IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT
•THERE IS A FIRE, EXPLOSION, OR SAFETY HAZARD
•A SPILL IS NOT IMMEDIATELY CLEANED UP
•THE SPILL WAS MORE THAN THE REPORTABLE QUANTITY OF 1 GALLON
OF A PETROLEUM PRODUCT
THE REPORT SHOULD BE FILED WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ALL
REPORTS SHOULD BE FILED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A SPILL OCCURRING.
THE REPORTABLE QUANTITY FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIALS CAN BE FOUND IN 40
CFR 302 AND THE US EPA WEBSITE:
HTTP://WWW.EPA.GOV/SUPERFUND/POLICY/RELEASE/RG
TO MINIMIZE THE POTENTIAL FOR A SPILL OF PETROLEUM PRODUCT OR
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TO COME IN CONTACT WITH STORMWATER, THE
FOLLOWING STEPS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED:
1) ALL MATERIALS WITH HAZARDOUS PROPERTIES, SUCH AS PESTICIDES,
PETROLEUM PRODUCTS, FERTILIZERS, SOAPS, DETERGENTS, CONSTRUCTION
CHEMICALS, ACIDS, BASES, PAINTS, PAINT SOLVENTS, ADDITIVES FOR SOIL
STABILIZATION, CONCRETE, CURING COMPOUNDS AND ADDITIVES, ETC.,
SHALL BE STORED IN A SECURE LOCATION, UNDER COVER AND IN
APPROPRIATE, TIGHTLY SEALED CONTAINERS WHEN NOT IN USE.
2)THE MINIMUM PRACTICAL QUANTITY OF ALL SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE
KEPT ON THE JOB SITE AND SCHEDULED FOR DELIVERY AS CLOSE TO TIME OF
USE AS PRACTICAL.
3) A SPILL CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT KIT (CONTAINING FOR EXAMPLE,
ABSORBENT MATERIAL SUCH AS KITTY LITTER OR SAWDUST, ACID, BASE,
NEUTRALIZING AGENT, BROOMS, DUST PANS, MOPS, RAGS, GLOVES, GOGGLES,
PLASTIC AND METAL TRASH CONTAINERS, ETC.) SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE
CONSTRUCTION SITE AND ITS LOCATION(S) SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH
LEGIBLE SIGNAGE AND SHOWN ON SITE MAPS.
a. THE SPILL CONTROL AND CONTAINMENT KIT SUPPLIES SHALL BE OF
SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES AND APPROPRIATE CONTENT TO CONTAIN A
SPILL FROM THE LARGEST ANTICIPATED PIECE OF EQUIPMENT AND FROM
THE LARGEST ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES OF PRODUCTS STORED ON THE
SITE AT ANY GIVEN TIME.
b. CONTENTS SHALL BE INSPECTED DAILY DURING THE DAILY
STORMWATER INSPECTION.
4)ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE STORED IN AND USED FROM THE ORIGINAL
CONTAINER WITH THE ORIGINAL PRODUCT LABEL. CONTAINERS MUST BE
STORED IN A MANNER TO PROTECT THEM FROM THE ELEMENTS AND
INCIDENTAL DAMAGE.
5) ALL PRODUCTS SHALL BE USED IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS
ON THE PRODUCT LABEL.
6)THE DISPOSAL OF EXCESS OR USED PRODUCTS SHALL BE IN STRICT
COMPLIANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PRODUCT LABEL AND
REGULATIONS.
GENERAL NOTES EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT & SPILL REPORTING
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
3
-
S
W
P
P
P
N
o
t
e
s
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
BUHL INVESTORS
5100 EDEN AVENUE
SUITE 317
EDINA MN, 55346
SITE
VICINITY MAPNORTH
QUADRANGLE MAPNORTH
SITE
ERW APD
C3.0
SWPPP NOTES
14.79%
3.
3
2
%
2.9
1
%
3.1
6
%
2.68%
4.4
4
%
1
.
0
6
%
2.40
%
1.01%
CONSTRUCTION
STAGING AREA
STOCKPILE
AREA
PORTABLE TOILETS.
SUBJECT TO CHANGE
LOCATION PER
CONTRACTORS
DIRECTION.
D
C
C
C
D
D
D
D
C
D
D
C
C
D
B
B
B
A
A A
CONSTRUCTION
STAGING AREA
ROCK ENTRANCE
INLET PROTECTION
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
BIOROLL OR SILT FENCE, IF PERVIOUS
& CONTRACTOR PREFERS
LEGEND
PROPERTY LINE
???EXISTING DRAINAGE DIRECTION
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
3
-
E
C
P
h
a
s
e
I
P
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C3.1
PHASE I
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES
1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE
INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
4. WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR
MATERIALS.
5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING
THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE
CONSTRUCTION.
7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE
CONTRACTOR.
8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO
EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS
NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.
10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER
FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS.
THE GC MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE JOBSITE BINDER AND SITE MAPS, TO REFLECT
THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE.
UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK PROGRESS WHEN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES
OCCUR: BMP INSTALLATION, MODIFICATION OR REMOVAL, CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (E.G.,
PAVING, STORM SEWER INSTALLATION, FOOTING INSTALLATION, ETC.), CLEARING, GRUBBING OR
GRADING, OR TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION.
IMPORTANT:
THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) TO THE CEC AND
OBTAIN WRITTEN CEC APPROVAL BEFORE DOING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. MODIFYING EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS (SUBSTITUTIONS ARE TYPICALLY ONLY
APPROVED IF SPECIFIED MATERIALS ARE NOT AVAILABLE OR THERE IS A VALID REASON THE
SPECIFIED BMP WILL NOT WORK)
2. ADDING/DELETING EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS;
3. MODIFYING THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE; OR
4. PERFORMING ANY ACTIONS OR IN ANY MANNER THAT IS CONTRARY TO THE SWPPP.
THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY OR ADD ADDITIONAL BMPS, WITHOUT CEC APPROVAL, IN AN
EMERGENCY SITUATION TO PREVENT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE OR PROTECT WATER QUALITY;
HOWEVER, GC MUST NOTIFY THE CEC AS SOON AS PRACTICAL AS TO THEIR ACTIONS TO DISCUSS
THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL OR SUPPLEMENTAL MEASURES AND TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED
APPROVALS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
PERMIT AND PROTECTION OF DOWNSTREAM WATER QUALITY.
AMENDING THE SWPPP DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT HAS TO BE REPRINTED. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO
ADD ADDENDA, SKETCHES, NEW SECTIONS, DETAILS, AND/OR REVISED DRAWINGS THAT HAVE THE
CEC NAME IN PRINT, ARE STAMPED, SIGNED, DATED, AND ARE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITTEN COPY
OF THE ASSOCIATED RFI AND ITS RESPONSE FROM CEC. ENGINEERED ITEMS MUST BE SIGNED
AND STAMPED BY THE CEC OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT.
UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS:
TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE
WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE
CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND
NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.
BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS.
2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE
WASHOUT PIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE.
3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.
4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT
TRAPS.
5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS
GRADING. ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE
NOTE: LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE IS SHOWN OFFSET FROM
PROPERTY LINE FOR CLARITY. OFFSITE WORK IS LIMITED TO
FINAL STORM CONNECTION AND DRIVEWAYS. CONTRACTOR TO
INSTALL AND MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION ON ADJACENT
PROPERTIES RECEIVING STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE.
SITE DATA
SITE AREA: ±3.34 AC
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE: ±3.18 AC
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS ±2.53 AC / ±0.33 AC
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS ±2.22 AC / ±0.64 AC
KEYNOTE LEGEND
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / EXIT
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
ROCKLOG PER CITY OF EDINA STANDARDS
INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING INLET
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
N300
1
D
C
C
D
D
D
D
C
D
C
C
D
B B
D
1.00%
1.04%
1.
7
0
%
1.
7
0
%
1.
0
6
%
2
.
2
7
%
4.0
5
%
1
.
4
3
%
1
.
3
2
%
1.52%
2.43
%
2.33%
3.
2
6
%
0.82%
1.98%
0.96%
1.6
1
%
4.4
3
%
0.7
4
%
3.12%
1.
1
4
%
2.
7
5
%
1.
2
1
%
1.18%
1.29%
1.
5
9
%
1.00%
1.00%
1.
7
3
%
1.
6
9
%
ROCK ENTRANCE
INLET PROTECTION
SILT FENCE
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
SAFETY FENCE
BIOROLL
LEGEND
EROSION CONTROL BLANKET
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
3
-
E
C
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
P
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C3.2
PHASE II
EROSION
CONTROL PLAN
EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTES
1. ALL PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE
INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS PRIOR TO SITE GRADING.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
4. WITHIN TWO WEEKS (14 DAYS) OF SITE GRADING, ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, OR ROCK BASE. REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR
MATERIALS.
5. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CITY, STATE, AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING
THE REMOVAL OF SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES DURING THE DURATION OF THE
CONSTRUCTION.
7. ANY EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED BASINS SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE
CONTRACTOR.
8. REMOVAL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.
9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SOILS AND SEDIMENT TRACKED ONTO
EXISTING STREETS AND PAVED AREAS AND SHALL SWEEP ADJACENT STREETS AS
NECESSARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.
10. IF BLOWING DUST BECOMES A NUISANCE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY WATER
FROM A TANK TRUCK TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS.
THE GC MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE JOBSITE BINDER AND SITE MAPS, TO REFLECT
THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGES TO THE PROJECT SITE.
UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK PROGRESS WHEN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES
OCCUR: BMP INSTALLATION, MODIFICATION OR REMOVAL, CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES (E.G.,
PAVING, STORM SEWER INSTALLATION, FOOTING INSTALLATION, ETC.), CLEARING, GRUBBING OR
GRADING, OR TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION.
IMPORTANT:
THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT A REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) TO THE CEC AND
OBTAIN WRITTEN CEC APPROVAL BEFORE DOING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING:
1. MODIFYING EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS (SUBSTITUTIONS ARE TYPICALLY ONLY
APPROVED IF SPECIFIED MATERIALS ARE NOT AVAILABLE OR THERE IS A VALID REASON THE
SPECIFIED BMP WILL NOT WORK)
2. ADDING/DELETING EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS;
3. MODIFYING THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION SEQUENCE; OR
4. PERFORMING ANY ACTIONS OR IN ANY MANNER THAT IS CONTRARY TO THE SWPPP.
THE CONTRACTOR MAY MODIFY OR ADD ADDITIONAL BMPS, WITHOUT CEC APPROVAL, IN AN
EMERGENCY SITUATION TO PREVENT SEDIMENT DISCHARGE OR PROTECT WATER QUALITY;
HOWEVER, GC MUST NOTIFY THE CEC AS SOON AS PRACTICAL AS TO THEIR ACTIONS TO DISCUSS
THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL OR SUPPLEMENTAL MEASURES AND TO OBTAIN THE REQUIRED
APPROVALS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
PERMIT AND PROTECTION OF DOWNSTREAM WATER QUALITY.
AMENDING THE SWPPP DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT HAS TO BE REPRINTED. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO
ADD ADDENDA, SKETCHES, NEW SECTIONS, DETAILS, AND/OR REVISED DRAWINGS THAT HAVE THE
CEC NAME IN PRINT, ARE STAMPED, SIGNED, DATED, AND ARE ACCOMPANIED BY WRITTEN COPY
OF THE ASSOCIATED RFI AND ITS RESPONSE FROM CEC. ENGINEERED ITEMS MUST BE SIGNED
AND STAMPED BY THE CEC OF RECORD FOR THE PROJECT.
UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS:
TRAILER, PARKING, LAYDOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE
WASHOUT, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE
CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATELY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND
NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATION AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE
CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.
BMP AND EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SEQUENCE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
1. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING STORMWATER CULVERTS.
2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (1), CONCRETE
WASHOUT PIT (1) AND INSTALL SILT FENCE.
3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.
4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT
TRAPS.
5. PERFORM CLEARING AND GRUBBING OF THE SITE. PERFORM MASS
GRADING. ROUGH GRADE TO ESTABLISH PROPOSED DRAINAGE
NOTE: LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE IS SHOWN OFFSET FROM
PROPERTY LINE FOR CLARITY. OFFSITE WORK IS LIMITED TO
FINAL STORM CONNECTION AND DRIVEWAYS. CONTRACTOR TO
INSTALL AND MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION ON ADJACENT
PROPERTIES RECEIVING STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE.
SITE DATA
SITE AREA: ±3.34 AC
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE: ±3.18 AC
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS ±2.85 AC / ±0.33 AC
PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS/PERVIOUS ±2.54 AC / ±0.64 AC
KEYNOTE LEGEND
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE / EXIT
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
ROCKLOG PER CITY OF EDINA STANDARDS
INLET PROTECTION AT EXISTING INLET
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
DN
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
DN
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
DN
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
TYP.
A
TYP.
A
TYP.
ATYP.
A
J
J
PROPOSED AIR
INTAKE
PROPOSED AIR
EXHAUST
PROPOSED
TRANSFORMER
WOONERF
PROPOSED
PICK-UP /
DROP-OFF
STALLS
PROPOSED CURB AND
GUTTER TO BE REPLACE &
MATCH EXISTING.
PROPOSED
PERVIOUS PAVER
DRAIN.
PROPOSED PERVIOUS
PAVER DRAIN.
PROPOSED PERVIOUS
PAVER DRAIN.
UNDERGROUND
BUILDING
FOOTPRINT (TYP)
UNDERGROUND
BUILDING
FOOTPRINT (TYP)
OVERHEAD BUILDING
EDGE (TYP)
OVERHEAD BUILDING
EDGE (TYP)
PROPOSED
STRIPED
CROSSWALK
PROPOSED
STRIPED
CROSSWALK
EXISTING
STRIPED
CROSSWALK
PROPOSED
LANDSCAPE
PLANTER (TYP)
PROPOSED
LANDSCAPE
PLANTER (TYP)
PROPOSED
LANDSCAPE
PLANTER (TYP)
PROPOSED STAIRS &
RAILING ALONG
BUILDING FACE
PROPOSED STAIRS &
WALL ALONG
SEATING AREA
PROPOSED
STAIRS
PROPOSED
SLOPED SIDEWALK
AT-GRADE ENTRANCE TO
UNDERGROUND PARKING
PROPOSED PERVIOUS
PAVER DRAIN.
NORTH
PHASE
SOUTH
PHASE
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
PLANTER (TYP)PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
PLANTER (TYP)
EXISTING
TRANSFORMER
EXISTING GAS
METERS
EXISTING
TRANSFORMER
EXISTING STRIPED
CROSSWALK
EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
8.
4
'
23.6'
8.
0
'
21.0'
10
.
2
'
13
.
7
'
32
.
1
'
24.0'
8.
6
'
4.
2
'
15.0'
15.0'
20
.
9
'
22.5'18.6'
2
2
.
5
'
3.
5
'
16.0'
40
.
7
'
19.1'
1
7
.
0
'
38
.
7
'
12
.
6
'
16.0'12.0'14.5'
8
.
6
'
1
1
.
4
'
12.0'
16
.
0
'
3.2'
15
.
0
'
8.
2
'
RELOCATED CENTER
PARKING MONUMENT SIGN,
NEW FACE TO INCLUDE
NORTH PARKING
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
PROPERTY LINE
OVERHEAD BUILDING EDGE
UNDERGROUND BUILDING FOOTPRINT
SETBACK LINE
PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVERS
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVERS
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
PROPERTY LINE
OVERHEAD BUILDING EDGE
UNDERGROUND BUILDING FOOTPRINT
SETBACK LINE
PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVERS
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVERS
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
PROPERTY LINE
OVERHEAD BUILDING EDGE
UNDERGROUND BUILDING FOOTPRINT
SETBACK LINE
PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVERS
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT
PROPOSED PERVIOUS PAVERS
PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
M
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
H
a
n
s
e
n
\
E
d
i
n
a
C
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
P
l
a
n
S
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
4
-
S
i
t
e
P
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C4.0
CIVIL SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS
AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS
AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES,
TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY
ENTRANCE LOCATIONS.
3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'.
4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED,
REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE
BID.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE
NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE,
SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE
WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE
INCLUDED IN BASE BID.
7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A
SURVEY BY SUNDE, DATED 02/28/2017.
7.1. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR
OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.
8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 2.86 ACRES.
9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN
FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE,
LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND
ELECTRICAL PLAN.
11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND
UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED
WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS
SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE.
12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS.
13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY
DIMENSIONS.
14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.
15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT.
16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 8' IN WIDTH AND 21' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE
INDICATED.
BUILDING A DATA SUMMARY
AREAS
BUILDING 1 FOOTPRINT (SF)47245
BUILDING 2A FOOTPRINT (SF)10440
BUILDING 2B FOOTPRINT (SF)14935
BUILDING 2C FOOTPRINT (SF)11594
TOTAL BUILDING AREA 84214 SF (67.6% OF TOTAL
PROPERTY AREA)
PROPERTY SUMMARY
EDINA, MN COLLABORATIVE
TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 2.86 ACRES
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 3.34 ACRES
EXISTING PROPOSED
IMPERVIOUS AREA 2.53 ACRES 2.22 ACRES
PERVIOUS AREA 0.33 ACRES 0.64 ACRES*
ZONING SUMMARY
EXISTING ZONING PCD-2
PROPOSED ZONING PUD
KEYNOTE LEGEND
B612 CURB AND GUTTER
OUTFALL CURB
6" PIPE BOLLARD TYPICAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SEE
DETAIL SHEET
SOLID ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS. PAINTED
RETROREFLECTIVE WHITE.
LIGHT POLE WITH BASE, SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
SEE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION.
"STOP" SIGN.
"BEGIN ONE WAY" SIGN.
"ONE WAY DO NOT ENTER" SIGN.
"PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC ONLY" SIGN.
MOUNTABLE CURB
*PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS REDUCTION OF 12%
PARKING DATA SUMMARY
LOCATION EXISTING PARKING PROPOSED PARKING
NORTH RAMP 269 STALLS 650 STALLS
CENTER RAMP 309 STALLS 261 STALLS
SOUTH RAMP 329 STALLS 329 STALLS
TOTAL 907 STALLS 1,240 STALLS
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
N300
1
WB-40 SEMI TRUCK
MOVEMENT
TRUCK MOVEMENT FOR
XCEL ACCESS TO EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
TRASH PICKUP
LOCATION
TRASH PICKUP
LOCATION
DROP-OFF
LOCATION
SNOW DROP
LOCATION
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
N300
1
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
N300
1
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
4
-
T
r
u
c
k
M
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C4.1
TRUCK
MOVEMENT
PLAN
THE VEHICLE MANEUVERING IDENTIFIED ON THIS PLAN
WAS PREPARED USING AUTOTURN SOFTWARE AND DOES
NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT ACTUAL CONDITIONS
NOR DOES IT ACCOUNT FOR EXTERNAL FACTORS. THIS
ANALYSIS SHOULD NOT BE USED AS THE SOLE BASIS FOR
THE CLIENT'S DECISION MAKING
LEGEND
PROPOSED ADA ROUTE
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
4
.
2
S
I
G
N
P
L
A
N
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C4.2
ADA AND SIGN
PLAN
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
FFE = 887.5
FFE = 886.5FFE = 886.5
ME:???
FFE = 885.0
FFE = 887.6
FFE = 885.0
???
FFE = 884.81FFE = 887.65
EXISTING STORM
CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM
INLET AND ADJUST CASTING
TO NEW ELEVATION
CONNECT EXISTING ROOF
DRAIN TO PROPOSED STORM
SEWER FIELD VERIFY
LOCATION AND ELEVATION
(3) CONNECT EXISTING ROOF
DRAIN TO PROPOSED STORM
SEWER FIELD VERIFY
LOCATION AND ELEVATION
CONNECT EXISTING ROOF
DRAIN TO PROPOSED STORM
SEWER
CONNECT EXISTING ROOF
DRAIN TO PROPOSED STORM
SEWER FIELD VERIFY
LOCATION AND ELEVATION
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER
EXISTING 30" STORM SEWER.
FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND
INVERT.
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR925
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00
LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
PROPOSED STORM INLET
PROPOSED DRAINTILE
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR925
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00
LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
PROPOSED STORM INLET
PROPOSED DRAINTILE
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING CONTOUR
PROPOSED CONTOUR925
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00
LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
PROPOSED STORM INLET
PROPOSED DRAINTILE
DRAINAGE SCHEDULE
STRUCTURE
NO.
STM - 100
STM - 101
STM - 102
STM - 104
STM - 105
STM - 106
STM - 107
STM - 108
STM - 109
STR -206
STR -208
STRUCTURE/
CASTING TYPE
MH
YARD INLET
MH
CBMH
CB
CBMH
CBMH
CBMH
CB
Null Structure
Null Structure
RIM/GRATE
ELEVATION
887.97
888.52
887.66
887.39
887.52
884.04
884.61
886.86
886.78
883.04
882.98
INVERT
ELEVATION
IN
N 874.95
E 880.49
E 881.57
E 882.46
S 882.81
S 881.40
S 877.83
W 879.05
N 880.57
S 883.05
N 878.86
W 881.34
PIPE
SIZE
IN
30"
18"
18"
18"
18"
6"
18"
18"
18"
12"
15"
10"
PIPE
SLOPE
IN
0.20%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
2.00%
1.30%
1.30%
6.59%
2.00%
1.00%
4.00%
INVERT
ELEVATION
OUT
S 874.95
W 881.57
W 882.46
W 882.81
N 883.02
N 877.83
N 879.05
E 880.57
S 880.98
E 881.52
S 878.86
PIPE
SIZE
OUT
30"
18"
18"
18"
18"
18"
18"
18"
18"
10"
15"
PIPE
SLOPE
OUT
0.30%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
1.30%
1.30%
1.30%
6.59%
4.00%
1.00%
PIPE MATERIAL
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
RCP
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
5
-
G
r
a
d
i
n
g
P
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C5.0
GRADING &
DRAINAGE PLAN
GRADING PLAN NOTES
1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF EDINA,
SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.
2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST
TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY
LOCATIONS.
3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76
HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252
HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306
PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034
3.1. STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443
HDPE PER ASTM 3212
PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212
4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING
UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY
DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS.
5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER
EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER
SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL
ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED
PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL
CONTROL.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED
STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS.
8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO
SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE.
9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY
ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME
THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE
CONSTRUCTION SITE.
10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE
LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION.
11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB
AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE.
12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND
GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS.
13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE
ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE
RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>.
14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING
DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN
NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12
HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO
CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL
ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL
DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES
SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY
IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO
CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE
ISSUES.
16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS.
17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE
IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN
LANDSCAPE AREAS.
18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION
<XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR
ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION.
19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT
INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS.
20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
CURRENT PLUMBING CODE.
21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5%
SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.
22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL
CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB
WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER.
47,245± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 1
10,440± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2A
14,935± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2B
11,594± SF
PROPOSED BUILDING 2C
CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE FIELD VERIFY
LOCATION AND ELEVATION
CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY
SEWER SERVICE FIELD VERIFY
LOCATION AND ELEVATION
16 LF 6" DIP
COMBINED FIRE AND
DOMESTIC SERVICE
CUT IN 6" TEE
CIP WATERMAIN W/ 6"
GV
CORE DRILL 8" PVC TO
EXISTING MANHOLE FIELD
VERIFY EXISTING ELEVATIONCONSTRUCT MANHOLE
OVER EXISTING 9" VCP
SANITARY SEWER
CUT IN 6" TEE CIP
WATERMAIN W/ 6" GV
16 LF 6" DIP
COMBINED FIRE
AND CONNECTED
SERVICE
(2) CUT IN 6" TEE
CIP WATERMAIN W/ 6" GV
43 LF 6" DIP FIRE
SERVICE
43 LF 6" DIP DOMESTIC
SERVICE
CONNECT ROOF DRAIN
TO EXISTING 12" RCP
STORM SEWER
CONNECT ROOF DRAIN
TO EXISTING 12" RCP
STORM SEWER
PROTECT EXISTING
XCEL MANHOLE
PROTECT EXISTING
XCEL MANHOLE
CONNECT ROOF DRAIN
TO EXISTING 12" RCP
STORM SEWER
PROPOSED STREET
LIGHTING
PROTECT EXISTING
TRANSFORMERS
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONNECTION
UP
DN
UP
UP
UP
1'
-
6
"
12
'
-
0
"
1' - 6"
1'
-
6
"
1' - 6"
1'
-
6
"
1' - 6"
1'
-
6
"
1' - 6"
C
C
C
C
CC
C CC
C C C
C
CONNECT ROOF DRAIN
TO EXISTING 15" RCP
STORM SEWER
PROPOSED RETAIL GAS
AND SERVICE METER
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
GAS AND SERVICE
METER
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
GAS AND SERVICE
METER PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
GAS AND SERVICE
METER
PROPOSED RETAIL GAS
AND SERVICE METER
PROPOSED RETAIL GAS
AND SERVICE METER
LEGEND
PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
PROPOSED WATERMAIN
PROPOSED STORM INLET
PROPOSED GATE VALVE
PROPOSED HYDRANT
PROPOSED TEE
PROPOSED REDUCER
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE
PROPOSED GAS MAIN
PROPOSED STORM SEWER
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND CABLE TV
PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE
PROPOSED GREASE TRAP
PROPOSED DRAINTILE
PROPOSED UNDERGROUND PRIMARY
SANITARY SEWER SCHEDULE
STRUCTURE
NO.
SAN - 200
SAN - 202
SAN - 205
SAN - 206
SAN - 207
SAN - 208
SAN - 209
SAN - 210
SAN - 211
STRUCTURE/
CASTING TYPE
MH
TIE IN
MH
MH
GREASE TRAP
TIE IN
GREASE TRAP
TIE IN
TIE IN
RIM/GRATE
ELEVATION
886.76
875.72
885.11
884.82
884.81
877.13
884.95
876.89
876.19
INVERT
ELEVATION
IN
W 874.66
S 874.66
SE 873.24
W 873.60
E 875.48
W 876.19
S 875.36
W 876.29
E 876.10
PIPE
SIZE
IN
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
PIPE
SLOPE
IN
0.50%
1.29%
1.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.00%
3.70%
2.19%
1.00%
INVERT
ELEVATION
OUT
E 874.66
N 874.99
E 873.24
NW 873.56
E 876.33
E 876.41
W 876.10
W 876.17
N 875.47
PIPE
SIZE
OUT
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
8"
PIPE
SLOPE
OUT
0.50%
1.29%
0.83%
1.00%
1.00%
2.19%
1.00%
1.00%
3.70%
PIPE MATERIAL
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
PVC
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
6
-
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
P
l
a
n
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C6.0
UTILITY PLAN
UTILITY PLAN NOTES
1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION
OF PROPOSED UTILITIES.
2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP
8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP
6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034
DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241
CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150
4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150
SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER
ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241.
4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.
5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS
THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS
INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.
6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING
18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE
OR STRUCTURE).
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES.
+N THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY
LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND
PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL
JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE
CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH
APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18"
VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11
(AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).
9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED
BEFORE BACKFILLING.
10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH
PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED
GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS.
11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY
COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I.
12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY
NEW LINES.
13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES.
14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF
EDINA AND/OR MINNESOTA WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF
THE WATER AND SEWER LINES.
15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR
ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON
RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE,
MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED
ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE
APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY
EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE
THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING
UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON
THE PLANS.
16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.
17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR
INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS.
18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND
ELECTRICAL PLAN.
19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED
IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS.
20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED
AND MAINTAINED.
21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH
REACTION BLOCKING.
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
7
-
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C7.0
CIVIL DETAILS
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
7
-
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C7.1
CIVIL DETAILS
THE COLLABORTIVE
REDEVELOPMENT
.
MARKET STREET
EDINA, MN 55424
K:
\
T
W
C
_
L
D
E
V
\
m
o
h
a
g
e
n
_
h
a
n
s
e
n
\
e
d
i
n
a
c
o
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
v
e
\
3
D
e
s
i
g
n
\
C
A
D
\
p
l
a
n
s
h
e
e
t
s
\
C
7
-
D
e
t
a
i
l
s
.
d
w
g
N
160886001
DLE
06/02/2017
\
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,
SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY
ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
MINNESOTA.
DANIEL L. ELENBAAS
06/02/2017 44614
2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE WEST, SUITE 238N
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114
Ph: 651-645-4197 www.kimley-horn.com
ERW APD
C7.2
CIVIL DETAILS
DATE: June 14, 2017
TO: The Collabortive Redevelopment Owner and Development Team
CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director
FROM: Chad Millner, P.E. – Director of Engineering
Charlie Gerk, P.E. – Graduate Engineer
RE: The Collaborative Redevelopment - Market (formally 49 ½) Street – Development
Review
The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, street and utility
connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Civil, Architectural, and Landscaping drawings
dated 06/02/2017.
Details
1. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement will be required.
Survey
2. Consider re-plat of parcels to establish ownership boundaries.
3. Consider vacating and establishing easements for utility, sidewalk, and roadway purposes. Noted
easement locations and requests shown below.
a. Existing easements
i. Storm at 3944
ii. Sidewalk at 3944
iii. Sidewalk at 3940
iv. Utility 3930
v. Sidewalk at 3930
vi. Various reciprocal and driveway easements on south parcels
b. New easements for the corner of Halifax and Market (49th ½) Street for roadway purposes.
c. Provide easements for public utilities as determined.
Living Streets
4. Maintain sidewalk access during construction.
5. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements.
6. Clearly denote private paths or sidewalk. Maintenance for non-public sidewalks to be responsibility of
property owner or maintenance district.
7. Pedestrian access plans will be required.
8. Ensure at minimum 6-ft spacing between sidewalk planters and building face for snow removal
operations.
9. Ensure proper sight lines exist over planters for existing vehicles.
10. Add continental crosswalk markings per city standard plate #716.
a. 2 on Market (49th ½) Street and 1 on Halifax
b. Install RRFB’s at the crosswalks on Market (49th ½) Street.
11. Consider improvements or additions to area lighting for pedestrian safety or special events.
T raffic and Street
12. Construction staging and traffic control plans will be required.
13. The old Hootens Cleaners and Edina Realty Sites will not be available for construction staging due to
construction on the north ramp.
14. Review need for left turn arrow pavement marking for westbound Market Street between new median
islands.
15. Consider providing gaps in sidewalk planters for snow storage / removal.
16. Apply for curb cut permit for entrances. 18” bituminous patch required.
17. Due to the number of utility digs, curb cut relocations and replacement of the curb, mill and overly the
entire width of the Market (49th ½) Street from Halifax Avenue to east property line after other work is
completed.
18. Ensure adequate space for garbage collection vehicles.
a. The trash areas needs to be as big as they currently are and increased in size to accommodate
the new retail spaces that are being built on the south side of Market Street. Consideration
should be given to provide a trash area on the north side of Market Street otherwise, they will
be required to cross the busy street with their trash bins during the day numerous times. It
should also be sized to accommodate organic pickup which is more similar in size to the area in
the South ramp. The 50th and France association handles ALL of the commercial and retail trash
removal from the district and will continue to in the future.
19. Ensure alley light fixtures are higher than the anticipated trucks using the alley to reduce risk of damage.
20. Snow chute detail has been provided to the development team.
21. Ensure parking ramp entrance elevations meet ADA requirements for a handicap van.
22. Match size and style of existing concrete curb and gutter.
23. Market Street is a Municipal State Aid road with an ADT of 6700. Lane and median widths must meet
MSA standards (Rule 8820.9936). Review and approval required by the engineering department.
24. Recent Parking Ramp Improvements – Match Specifications
c. Reuse or replace parking ramp way finding signage.
d. Ensure vehicle counting system in middle and north ramps are operational after improvements.
e. Reuse LED lighting fixtures if changes to lighting are required.
25. Structural integrity of underground parking structure to support shared street loading required by
developer’s engineer.
Sanitary and Wat er Utilities
26. Abandoned sanitary services to be removed to the sanitary sewer main at old Hootens Cleaners and
Edina Realty sides. Confirm with public works.
27. Abandoned water services to be removed to corporation stop at water main at old Hootens Cleaners
and Edina Realty sides. Confirm with public works.
28. Try to create 90 degree angle between sanitary MH# 206 and MH#205.
29. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations.
30. Clearly indicate private vs public utilities.
31. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer.
32. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer.
33. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings.
34. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit. Water connections most likely need to occur at night.
Wet taps only allowed with prior approval from engineering and public works.
35. Met Council SAC determination and fees required. City REC charges based on this determination.
36. SAC charges or REC fees by the city can be paid per phase, prior to each phase having a building permit
issued.
37. Provide sprinkler system calculations at 30% plan review to allow time to consider separate or
combined domestic and fire suppression systems water service(s).
38. Preliminary fire flows are 2000-3000 gpm with a peak pressure of 60-70 psi.
39. Other fire related comments were provided directly by the fire department.
Storm Water Utility
40. Abandoned lines to be removed to nearest structure.
41. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report.
42. Does building 1 have any connections to the storm sewer?
43. CC City Engineering Staff on correspondence with watershed district.
44. Evidence of watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of
watershed is required for building permit.
Grading Erosion, Sediment Control and Landscaping
45. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site permit is required.
46. Provide 10-ft access path behind north ramp for landscaping maintenance access.
47. Consider meeting tree replacement requirements by planting trees on private property north of north
ramp to screen north ramp.
48. Extend irrigation systems to planters, trees, and parking ramp green walls.
Sustainability
49. The city is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions 30% by 2025 and 80% by 2050. Businesses
in Edina can take steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by:
a. Building external trash enclosure/screen that make enough room for an organics dumpster along
with the trash and recycling. Business communities are finding separating organic waste, reduces
their waste management expenses and their greenhouse gas emissions.
b. Building facilities that meet Energy Star or SB 2030 Energy Standard which use less energy, have
lower utility bills, and generate fewer greenhouse gas emissions than an average building.
Efficient buildings will be the cornerstone for Edina to be seen as a sustainability leader.
c. Contacting Xcel Energy for Energy Design assistance. This Xcel Conservation program provides
design assistance and generous rebate funding above individual rebates. The creation and
commission of new buildings, lighting, and heating and cooling systems are the best time to
reduce future energy costs.
d. Contacting Center Point Energy for their Builder and Developer Programs. The program assists
in finding rebates and other programs that can help builders, developers, and their customers
save energy and money
e. Installing green roofs can lower energy costs, less frequent roof replacement due to greater
durability, reduced stormwater management costs, support pollinators, and creation of job
opportunities. Potential savings can be calculated via Green Roof Calculator.
Other Agency Coordination
50. Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit is required. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits
may also be required.
192673v1 1
(reserved for recording information)
SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
CITY OF EDINA
MARKET STREET
AGREEMENT dated June 14, 2017, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (“City”) and EDINA MARKET STREET LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”).
1. BACKGROUND.
A. Developer has applied to develop Edina Market Street in the City of Edina, Minnesota,
legally described as:
The north 7.5 feet of Lot 30, Auditor’s Subdivision 172; and
The north 7.5 feet of Lot 33, Auditor’s Subdivision 172; and
The south 42.5 feet of Lot 32, Auditor’s Subdivision 172; and
The north 25 feet of the south half of Lot 34 and the north 25 feet of the east 13 feet of the south half of Lot
35, Auditor’s Subdivision 172; and
The south 25 feet of the north half of Lots 34 and 35, Auditor’s Subdivision 172; and
The north 25 feet of the south half of Lot 35 except the east 13 feet thereof, Auditor’s Subdivision 172; and
The north 25 feet of the east 22 feet of the south half of Lot 36, Auditor’s Subdivision 172; and
That part of the south 25 feet of the east 137 feet of the north half of Lot 36, Auditor’s Subdivision 172
lying southeasterly of a line lying 50 feet northwesterly of and parallel with Line A described below; and
192673v1 2
The north 25 feet of the east 122 feet of the south half of Lot 36, Auditor’s Subdivision 172; and that part of
said east 122 feet of Lot 36 lying southerly of the south line of said north 25 feet and northwesterly of Line
A described below.
Line A is described as commencing at the southwest corner of said east 122 feet of Lot 36; thence
northerly, along the west line of said east 122 feet of Lot 36, a distance of 208.99 feet; thence
northeasterly 99.49 feet, on a tangential curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 63
feet and a central angle of 90 degrees 28 minutes 52 seconds to said south line of the north 25
feet of Lot 36 and said line there terminating.
(hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”).
B. The City has rezoned the Subject Property to Planned Unit Development (“PUD”).
Development shall be in accordance with the PUD. A Site Improvement Performance Agreement is required
for the PUD.
2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise
disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the
following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed
with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office, 2) the required security has been
received by the City, and 3) the required insurance has been received by the City.
3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans
which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the
written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The Plans are:
Final Development Plans submitted to city on 06/02/2017.
The Developer may request changes to the Plans. For Plan changes deemed minor, pursuant to City
ordinances, changes can be reviewed and approved by City staff. All other Plan changes shall require
approval by the City Council.
4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be
implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional
erosion control obligations if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be
stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity.
192673v1 3
Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which may include temporary seed
to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc
anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling
erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with
the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may
take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in
advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights
or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such
work within ten (10) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any
costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the
Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved Erosion Control Plan.
5. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors
a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City
in conjunction with site development.
6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance
with the Construction Management Plan.
7. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Public Improvements shall be installed in accordance with City
standard specifications and ordinances. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are
prohibited between the hours of 9 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. All Public Improvement Plans shall be
prepared by a competent registered professional engineer and submitted to the City for approval by the City
Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure
an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer’s engineer will be able to certify that
the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the
City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s expense, have one or more City inspectors and a
soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall
follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. The Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site
192673v1 4
project management. The Developer’s engineer is responsible for design changes and contract
administration between the Developer and the Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall
schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned,
including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the
completion of the Public Improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the
City with a complete set of reproducible “as constructed” plans and an electronic file of the “as constructed”
plans that satisfy the City’s record drawings requirement which are attached. The Record Drawings shall be
submitted prior to the Developer receiving an occupancy permit for any building on the Subject Property.
8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is
the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any
necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and
regulations.
9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required Public Improvements by
November 1, 2019.
10. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from
construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the
Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control,
street cleaning, and street sweeping.
11. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required
by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City, the Public Improvements identified in the Plans lying
within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. Prior to acceptance of
the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits:
Contractor’s Certificate
Engineer’s Certificate
Developer’s Certificate
certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. All
necessary forms will be furnished by the City. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer,
192673v1 5
the City Engineer will accept the completed public improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance
of the improvements, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "record” plans,
an electronic file of the “record” plans in accordance with the City’s Design and Construction Manual.
12. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The
Developer shall pay for in-house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include
monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems
regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, Project monitoring during the
warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security.
13. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement
and all of the Plans, payment of the costs of all Public Improvements, and construction of all Public
Improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a
bank ("security") for $271,400.00 plus a cash fee of $16,284.00 for City engineering administration.. The
bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager. The City may draw down the security, on five (5)
business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or without
notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required Public
Improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the
City may also draw it down without notice. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used
to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Project has been
substantially completed in accordance with the Plans and financial obligations to the City have been
satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%)
of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the security shall be
retained as security until all Public improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to
the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty
security is provided, and the Public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City’s
standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions.
192673v1 6
14. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Public Improvements required to be constructed
by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for all
Public Improvements is one year and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City Council.
The Developer shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified
construction costs of the Public Improvements to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent
(10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City or until
the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work.
The City’s standard specifications for utility construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of
utilities.
15. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. Developer shall comply with: all of the conditions outlined in the
director of engineering’s memo dated March 31, 2017 and June 14, 2017; sustainability standards in the
director of engineering’s memo dated March 31, 2017 and June 14, 2017; the SRF Traffic & Parking Study
recommendations.
16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS.
A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction
with the development of the site and installation of public improvements, including but not limited to legal,
planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and development of the
Subject Property, the preparation of this Agreement, review of any other plans and documents.
B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless
from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from
Developer’s development of the site and installation of Public Improvements. The Developer shall indemnify
the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay
or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees.
C. In the event the City is successful in litigation to enforce the terms of this Agreement,
the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in litigation and subsequent enforcement of this
Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees.
192673v1 7
D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed
obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not
paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid
within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year.
17. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this
Agreement.
B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of
building permits, including lots sold to third parties.
C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this
Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this Agreement.
D. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of Public Improvements, the
Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Public Improvements and
damage to Public Improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material
men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connections or inspections may be conducted
and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent
basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are
accepted by the City Engineer.
E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the
provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties
and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to
enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
F. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the
Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer
has fee title to the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto,
192673v1 8
from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property;
and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants.
G. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire public liability and property damage
insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of
the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of
them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $100,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for
each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a
combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on
the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the City
a certificate evidencing coverage. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given ten (10) days
advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The Developer and contractors must provide a
Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements:
1. The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is named as
Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a
Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.”
2. Certificate Holder must be City of Edina.
3. Provide copy of policy endorsement showing City of Edina named as Additional
Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.
H. The Developer and its general contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation
Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to
the limit of $100,000.00 each accident.
I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in
addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City,
at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set
forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be
deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any
other right, power or remedy.
192673v1 9
J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the
City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer
sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it.
K. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of
billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the
halting of all work on the property.
L. The Developer represents to the City that the development complies with all city,
county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision
ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development
does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the
development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall cease work
until there is compliance.
M. From time to time, when requested by Developer, the City shall execute and deliver a
recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this
Agreement.
18. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to
be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly
reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as
determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than ten (10) days in advance. This
Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for
permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other
remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part.
19. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand
delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the
following address: 1400 Van Buren St NE, Suite 200-202, Minneapolis, MN 55413. Notices to the City shall
be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in
192673v1 10
care of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota
55424-1330.
[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.
Signature pages follow.]
192673v1 11
CITY OF EDINA
BY: __________________________________________
James Hovland, Mayor
AND __________________________________________
Scott Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
20___, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina,
a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its
City Council.
______________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
192673v1 12
DEVELOPER:
EDINA MARKET STREET LLC
BY: __________________________________________
Name: _________________________________
Title: ___________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF ___________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
20___, by ____________________________, the _________________________ of Edina Market Street
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company.
______________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A.
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290
Eagan, MN 55121
Telephone: 651-452-5000
[RNK]
192673v1 13
MORTGAGE CONSENT
TO
SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
_______________ Bank, which holds a mortgage on the subject property, the development of which
is governed by the foregoing Site Improvement Performance Agreement, agrees that the Site Improvement
Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage.
Dated this _____ day of ____________, 20___.
_________________________________
BY: ______________________________________
Its: _________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
( ss.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of ________________,
20___, by _____________________________________________________ in their capacity as
Agent/Lender ___________________________________________________________________.
________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A.
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
(651) 452-5000
[RNK]
192673v1 14
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT
No. ___________________
Date: _________________
TO: City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330
Dear Sir or Madam:
We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable
Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned
bank.
The draft must:
a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____,
of (Name of Bank) ";
b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina.
c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30,
2_____.
This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45)
days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written
notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written
notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45)
days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 W.
50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to
the renewal date.
This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended,
amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein.
This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be
made under this Letter of Credit.
This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice
for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600.
We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored
upon presentation.
BY: ____________________________________
Its ______________________________
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.G .
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Joyc e R ep ya, S enio r P lanner
Item Activity:
Subject:R es olution No. 2017-66: F is cal Year 2018 - 2020 Jo int
C ooperatio n Agreement/C ommunity Develo p ment
Blo c k G rant (C DB G ) R enewal
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve F iscal Year 2018 - 2020 J oint Cooperation Agreement/C ommunity D evelopment B lock G rant (C D B G )
P rogram.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
E very three years a new agreement is required between the C ity of Edina and H ennepin C ounty to govern the
receipt and expenditure of C ommunity Development B lock G rant (C D B G) funds for the period of the
agreement.
T he purpose of the agreement is to set forth broad shared powers for carrying out housing and community
development activities.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Res olution No. 2017 -66: Fis cal Year 2018 - 2020 Joint Cooperation Agreement/Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Renewal
2018 - 2020 Joint Cooperation Agreement/CDBG Renewal - Staff Report
2018 - 2020 Joint Cooperation Agreement/CDBG Renewal
Redlined Agreement reflecting changes
Corres pondence with Hennepin County
June 20, 2017
Mayor & City Council
Joyce Repya, Senior Planner
Fiscal Year 2018-2020 Joint Cooperation Agreement/Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Renewal - Resolution No. 2017- 66
Information / Background:
Every three years a new agreement is required between the City of Edina and Hennepin County to
govern the receipt and expenditure of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the
period of the agreement. The purpose of the agreement is to set forth broad shared powers for
carrying out housing and community development activities. HUD requires this agreement in order
for Hennepin County to qualify as an urban county and receive CDBG Program entitlement funds.
The existing agreement pertaining to FY 2015-2017 expires at the end of the year.
Hennepin County anticipated that due to no changes being proposed to the agreement, it could be
automatically renewed without requiring the execution of another agreement and resolution. In
fact, the city received a letter from Hennepin County dated April 24, 2017, reflecting the automatic
renewal of the agreement for the Fiscal Year 2018-2020. However since then, HUD released some
required changes to the Joint Cooperation Agreement for 2018-2020, thus necessitating a new
resolution and signatures on the revised agreement.
The attached 2018-2020 Joint Cooperation Agreement reflects the following changes:
1) Clarification of Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing requirements, including that
cooperating units may lose some or all CDBG funding if they fail to comply with fair housing
requirements.
2) Creation of a process for pooled, competitive funding awards for public service activities.
3) Clarification of funding allocation process for cities that qualify for “metropolitan city” status
as defined by HUD.
4) Adjustment to thresholds with regard to determining “direct allocation” and consolidated
pool” funding allocations.
STAFF REPORT Page 2
5) Clarification of language with regard to planning and administrative costs (note that the
admin rate will remain 13% for PY 2018).
Due to the aforementioned changes imposed by HUD, Hennepin County has asked the city to
provide a resolution and signed the execution pages of the amended Joint Cooperation Agreement
for 2018-2020, attesting to the city’s approval of the revised Agreement.
1
Contract No. 17XXXXX
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," A-2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota,
55487, and the cities executing this Master Agreement, each hereinafter respectively referred to as
"COOPERATING UNIT," said parties to this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of
Minnesota, and made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
WITNESSETH:
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens
that COOPERATING UNIT shares its authority to carry out essential community development and housing
activities with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY to secure and administer Community Development
Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnership funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as
herein defined and, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this
Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions.
COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the execution of this Agreement that it understands that
it:
1. May not also apply for grants under the State CDBG Program from appropriations for
fiscal years during which it is participating in the Urban County Program; and
2. May not participate in a HOME Consortium except through the Urban County.
3. May not receive a formula allocation under the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG)
Program except through the Urban County.
I. DEFINITIONS
The definitions contained in 42 U.S.C. 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the
meanings given them:
A. "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42
U.S.C. 5301 et seq.).
B. “Activity” means a CDBG-funded activity eligible under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended. Example: single family rehab activity.
C. “Annual Program” means those combined activities submitted by cooperating units to COUNTY
for CDBG funding as part of the Consolidated Plan.
D. “Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice” or “AI” means an assessment of how laws,
regulations, policies and procedures affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing,
2
and how conditions, both private and public, affect fair housing choice. All HUD grantees must
certify that they will affirmatively further fair housing, which means conducting an Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI), taking appropriate actions to overcome the effects of
any impediments identified through that analysis, and keeping records of these actions.
E. "Consolidated Plan" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or
documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is
developed by the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the
Community Development Block Grant Program.
F. "Cooperating Unit(s)" means any city or town in Hennepin County that has entered into a
cooperation agreement that is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County, which is a
party to each Agreement.
G. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
H. "Metropolitan City" means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is
certified by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people, or which has previously been
granted Metropolitan City status by HUD.
I. “Program” means the HUD Community Development Block Grant Program as defined under Title
I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.
J. “Program Income” means gross income received by the recipient or a subrecipient directly
generated from the use of CDBG.
K. “Public service activities” means the provision of public services described in 24 CFR 570.201(e).
L. "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not
limited to 24 CFR Part 570.
M. “Urban County” means the entitlement jurisdiction within the provisions of the Act and includes
the suburban Hennepin County municipalities which are signatories to this Agreement.
II. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to
undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities and
authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who
reside within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community
Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Programs and HOME appropriations for the
Federal Fiscal Years 2018, 2019 and 2020 and from any program income generated from the expenditure of
such funds.
III. AGREEMENT
The initial term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1, 2017 and terminating no sooner
than the end of the program year covered by the Consolidated Plan for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal
Year 2020, as authorized by HUD, and for such additional time as may be required for the expenditure of funds
granted to the County for such period. Prior to the end of the initial term and the end of each subsequent
qualification period, the COUNTY, as the lead agency of the URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, shall provide a written notice to the COOPERATING UNIT
3
of their right not to participate in a subsequent qualification period. The written notice will provide the
COOPERATING UNIT a minimum thirty (30) day period to submit a written withdrawal. If the
COOPERATING UNIT does not submit to the COUNTY a written withdrawal during the notice period, this
Agreement shall be automatically extended for a subsequent three-year qualifying period.
This Agreement must be amended by written agreement of all parties to incorporate any future changes
necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County Qualification
Notice applicable for the year in which the next qualification of the County is scheduled. Failure by either
party to adopt such an amendment to the Agreement shall automatically terminate the Agreement following the
expenditure of all CDBG and HOME funds allocated for use in the COOPERATING UNIT's jurisdiction.
This Agreement shall remain in effect until the CDBG, HOME and ESG funds and program income
received (with respect to activities carried out during the three-year qualification period, and any successive
qualification periods under agreements that provide for automatic renewals) are expended and the funded
activities completed. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT cannot terminate or withdraw form this
Agreement while it remains in effect.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated at the end
of the program period during which HUD withdraws its designation of the COUNTY as an Urban County
under the Act.
This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING UNIT and
COUNTY pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies, and a copy of the
authorizing resolution and executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the
Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit so that the Agreement can be
submitted to HUD by July 24, 2017.
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the
urban county’s certifications required by Section 104(b) of the Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Fair Housing
Act, and affirmatively furthering fair housing. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall also take all actions
necessary to assure compliance with Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974 (which incorporates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of
1975), and other applicable laws.
IV. ACTIVITIES
COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out,
within the terms of this Agreement, certain activities eligible for funding under the Act. The COUNTY agrees
and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services
specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable requirements of the Act
and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and/or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic
grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate the COUNTY's responsibility to
assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act, including the development of the Consolidated Plan,
pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91.
COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COOPERATING UNIT will, in accord with a COUNTY-established schedule, prepare and
provide to the COUNTY, in a prescribed form, requests for the use of Community Development
Block Grant Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin
County Consolidated Plan.
4
B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that, pursuant to 24 CFR §570.501 (b), it is subject to the
same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient
Agreement set forth in 24 CFR §570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the
implementation requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly
executed with and in a form prescribed by the COUNTY.
C. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements
stated in paragraph B above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an
activity pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances, a
written Third Party Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING
UNIT in a form prescribed by COUNTY.
D. COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all funds annually allocated to activities pursuant to the
Subrecipient Agreement.
1. All funds not expended pursuant to the terms of the Subrecipient Agreement will be
relinquished to the COUNTY and will be transferred to a separate account for reallocation
on a competitive request for proposal basis at the discretion of the COUNTY where total
of such funds is $100,000 or greater. Amounts less than $100,000 shall be allocated by
COUNTY to other existing activities consistent with timeliness requirements and
Consolidated Plan goals.
E. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all program income pursuant to this
Agreement as provided below:
1. Program income from housing rehabilitation activities administered by the COUNTY will
be incorporated into a pool at the discretion of the COUNTY. The pool will be
administered by COUNTY and will be used for housing rehabilitation projects located
throughout the entire Urban County. When possible, COUNTY will give priority to
funding housing rehabilitation projects within the COOPERATING UNIT where the
program income was generated. Funds expended in this manner would be secured by a
Repayment Agreement/Mortgage running in favor of the COUNTY. Program income
generated by METROPOLITAN CITY COOPERATING UNITS that administer their own
housing rehabilitation activities may be retained by the COOPERATING UNIT at its
discretion.
2. COUNTY reserves the option to recapture program income generated by non-housing
rehabilitation activities if said funds have not been expended within twelve (12) months of
being generated. These funds shall be transferred to a separate account for reallocation on
a competitive request for proposal basis administered by COUNTY or, where the total of
such funds does not exceed $100,000, shall be reallocated by COUNTY to other existing
activities consistent with timeliness requirements and Consolidated Plan goals.
F. COOPERATING UNITS are encouraged to undertake joint activities involving the sharing of
funding when such action furthers the goals of the Consolidated Plan and meets the expenditure
goals.
G. If COUNTY is notified by HUD that it has not met the performance standard for the timely
expenditure of funds at 24 CFR 570.902(a) and the COUNTY entitlement grant is reduced by
HUD according to its policy on corrective actions, then the basic grant amount to any
COOPERATING UNIT that has not met its expenditure goal shall be reduced accordingly.
5
H. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to assist in accomplishing the community
development program and housing goals, as contained in the Urban Hennepin County
Consolidated Plan, and will comply with COUNTY’s direction to redirect the use of funds when
necessary to accomplish said goals.
I. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all activities funded, in part or in full by grant funds
received pursuant to this Agreement, shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair housing,
employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall, in implementing all
programs and/or activities funded by the basic grant amount, comply with all applicable Federal
and Minnesota Laws, statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights, affirmative action
and equal employment opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY.
J. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges the recommendations set forth in the current Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further
fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its
certifications to HUD may be prohibited from receiving part or all CDBG funding for its activities,
and may be required to reimburse COUNTY for part or all of funds it has received.
K. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process, as established by
COUNTY, in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974, as amended.
L. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY for any expenditure determined by HUD or
COUNTY to be ineligible.
M. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the
interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY.
N. COOPERATING UNIT has adopted and is enforcing:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to
or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights
demonstrations within its jurisdiction.
O. COOPERATING UNIT shall not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of grant funds
to
another metropolitan city, urban county, unit of general local government, or Indian tribe, or
insular area that directly or indirectly receives CDBG funds in exchange for any other funds,
credits or non-Federal considerations, but must use such funds for activities eligible under Title I
of the Act.
COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies, on an annual
basis, all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount
under the Act.
6
B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating
services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of a request for funding.
C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY
in fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program
and housing goals.
D. COUNTY shall, upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer local
housing rehabilitation activities funded pursuant to the Agreement, provided that COUNTY shall
receive Twelve percent (12%) of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as
reimbursement for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity.
E. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to
administer, for a possible fee, other activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of
COOPERATING UNIT.
F. COUNTY may, as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration, develop
and implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations, HUD administrative
directives, and administrative requirements of COUNTY; and COOPERATING UNIT shall
comply with said Administrative Rules.
V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS
Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under Section 106 of the Act shall be allocated as
follows:
A. Planning and administration costs are capped to 20 percent of the sum of the basic grant amount
plus program income that is received during the program year. During the term of this Agreement
the COUNTY will receive a planning and administrative retainage of up to fifteen percent (15%)
of the basic grant amount; included in this administrative amount is funding for county-wide Fair
Housing activities.
B. Funding for public service activities are capped to 15 percent of the sum of the basic grant amount
plus program income that is received during the previous program year. During the term of this
Agreement the COUNTY will retain up to 15% of the basic grant amount for allocation to public
service activities county-wide. Funds retained for public service activities will be awarded in a
manner determined by COUNTY on a competitive request for proposal basis.
C. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be made available by COUNTY to COOPERATING
UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part D and the procedure stated in part E of this
section utilizing U.S. Census Bureau data. The allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a
guarantee of funding.
D. Allocation of funding will be based upon a formula using U.S. Census Bureau data that bears the
same ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between:
1. The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING
UNITS.
2. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all
COOPERATING UNITS.
7
3. The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of
overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS.
4. In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio involving the extent of poverty
shall be counted twice.
E. Funds will be made available to communities utilizing the formula specified in C of this Section in
the following manner:
1. All COOPERATING UNITS which are also METROPOLITAN CITIES will receive
funding allocations in accordance with the COUNTY formula allocations.
2. All COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of greater than five
percent (5%) of the total using the procedure in part D. of this section will receive funding
allocations in accordance with the COUNTY formula allocations, unless the resulting
allocation would total less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00).
3. COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of five percent (5%) or less
of the total using the procedure in part D. of this section or with funding allocations of less
than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) will have their funds consolidated into
a pool for award in a manner determined by COUNTY on a competitive request for
proposal basis. Only the COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS whose funding has been
pooled will be eligible to compete for these funds.
4. COOPERATING UNITS shall have the option to opt-in to the consolidated pool specified
in item 3. of this part by providing written notice to COUNTY by November 15th annually.
F. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by the U.S. Census
Bureau. The COUNTY assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability
for any errors in the data.
G. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request a funding allocation, or a portion thereof, the
amount not requested shall be made available to other participating communities, in a manner
determined by COUNTY.
VI. METROPOLITAN CITIES
Any metropolitan city executing this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of
Urban Hennepin County.
This agreement can be voided if the COOPERATING UNIT is advised by HUD, prior to the
completion of the re-qualification process for fiscal years 2018-2020, that it is newly eligible to become a
metropolitan city and the COOPERATING UNIT elects to take its entitlement status. If the agreement is not
voided on the basis of the COOPERATING UNIT’s eligibility as a metropolitan city prior to July 16, 2017, the
COOPERATING UNIT must remain a part of the COUNTY program for the entire three-year period of the
COUNTY qualification.
VII. OPINION OF COUNSEL
The undersigned, on behalf of the Hennepin County Attorney, having reviewed this Agreement, hereby
opines that the terms and provisions of the Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and that
8
the COOPERATING UNIT has full legal authority to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community
development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly-assisted housing.
__________________________________________
Assistant County Attorney
9
VIII. HENNEPIN COUNTY EXECUTION
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on ____________,
2017, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement, the COUNTY
agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________________________
Chair of its County Board
_______________________________
Assistant County Attorney Attest: ________________________________________
Date: Deputy Clerk of the County Board
Date:
By: __________________________________________
County Administrator
Date:
By: __________________________________________
Assistant County Administrator – Public Works
Date:
Recommended for Approval:
________________________________________
Director, Community Works
Date:
10
IX. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION
COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the COOPERATING UNIT'S governing
body having duly approved this Agreement on , 2017, and pursuant to such approval and the
proper city official having signed this Agreement, COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the
provisions of this Joint Cooperation Agreement.
CITY OF
By:
Its Mayor
And:
Its City Manager
ATTEST:
CITY MUST CHECK ONE:
The City is organized pursuant to:
Plan A Plan B Charter
1
Contract No. 14080517XXXXX
JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of
Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," A-2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota,
55487, and the cities executing this Master Agreement, each hereinafter respectively referred to as
"COOPERATING UNIT," said parties to this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of
Minnesota, and made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59.
WITNESSETH:
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens
that COOPERATING UNIT shares its authority to carry out essential community development and housing
activities with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY to secure and administer Community Development
Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnership funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as
herein defined and, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this
Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions.
COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the execution of this Agreement that it understands that
it:
1. May not also apply for grants under the State CDBG Program from appropriations for
fiscal years during which it is participating in the Urban County Program; and
2. May not participate in a HOME Consortium except through the Urban County.
3. May not receive a formula allocation under the Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG)
Program except through the Urban County.
I. DEFINITIONS
The definitions contained in 42 U.S.C. 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the
meanings given them:
A. "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42
U.S.C. 5301 et seq.).
B. “Activity” means a CDBG-funded activity eligible under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended. Example: single family rehab activity.
C. “Annual Program” means those combined activities submitted by cooperating units to COUNTY
for CDBG funding as part of the Consolidated Plan.
D. “Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice” or “AI” means an assessment of how laws,
2
regulations, policies and procedures affect the location, availability, and accessibility of housing,
and how conditions, both private and public, affect fair housing choice. All HUD grantees must
certify that they will affirmatively further fair housing, which means conducting an Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI), taking appropriate actions to overcome the effects of
any impediments identified through that analysis, and keeping records of these actions.
D.E. "Consolidated Plan" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or
documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is
developed by the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the
Community Development Block Grant Program.
E.F. "Cooperating Unit(s)" means any city or town in Hennepin County that has entered into a
cooperation agreement that is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County, which is a
party to each Agreement.
F.G. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
G.H. "Metropolitan City" means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is
certified by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people, or which has previously been
granted Metropolitan City status by HUD.
H.I. “Program” means the HUD Community Development Block Grant Program as defined under Title
I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.
I.J. “Program Income” means gross income received by the recipient or a subrecipient directly
generated from the use of CDBG.
K. “Public service activities” means the provision of public services described in 24 CFR 570.201(e).
J.L. "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not
limited to 24 CFR Part 570.
K.M. “Urban County” means the entitlement jurisdiction within the provisions of the Act and includes
the suburban Hennepin County municipalities which are signatories to this Agreement.
II. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to
undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities and
authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who
reside within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community
Development Block Grant, Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG) Programs and HOME appropriations for the
Federal Fiscal Years 2015, 20162018, 2019 and 20172020 and from any program income generated from the
expenditure of such funds.
III. AGREEMENT
The initial term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1, 20142017 and terminating no
sooner than the end of the program year covered by the Consolidated Plan for the basic grant amount for the
Fiscal Year 20172020, as authorized by HUD, and for such additional time as may be required for the
expenditure of funds granted to the County for such period. Prior to the end of the initial term and the end of
3
each subsequent qualification period, the COUNTY, as the lead agency of the URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, shall provide a written notice to the
COOPERATING UNIT of their right not to participate in a subsequent qualification period. The written notice
will provide the COOPERATING UNIT a minimum thirty (30) day period to submit a written withdrawal. If
the COOPERATING UNIT does not submit to the COUNTY a written withdrawal during the notice period,
this Agreement shall be automatically extended for a subsequent three-year qualifying period.
This Agreement must be amended by written agreement of all parties to incorporate any future changes
necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County Qualification
Notice applicable for the year in which the next qualification of the County is scheduled. Failure by either
party to adopt such an amendment to the Agreement shall automatically terminate the Agreement following the
expenditure of all CDBG and HOME funds allocated for use in the COOPERATING UNIT's jurisdiction.
This Agreement shall remain in effect until the CDBG, HOME and ESG funds and program income
received (with respect to activities carried out during the three-year qualification period, and any successive
qualification periods under agreements that provide for automatic renewals) are expended and the funded
activities completed. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT cannot terminate or withdraw form this
Agreement while it remains in effect.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated at the end
of the program period during which HUD withdraws its designation of the COUNTY as an Urban County
under the Act.
This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING UNIT and
COUNTY pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies, and a copy of the
authorizing resolution and executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the
Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit so that the Agreement can be
submitted to HUD by July 25, 201424, 2017.
COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the
urban county’s certifications required by Section 104(b) of the Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Fair Housing
Act, and affirmatively furthering fair housing. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall also take all actions
necessary to assure compliance with Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of
1974 (which incorporates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act 0fof 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of
1975), and other applicable laws.
IV. ACTIVITIES
COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out,
within the terms of this Agreement, certain activities eligible for funding under the Act. The COUNTY agrees
and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services
specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable requirements of the Act
and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and/or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic
grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate the COUNTY's responsibility to
assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act, including the development of the Consolidated Plan,
pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91.
COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows:
4
A. COOPERATING UNIT will, in accord with a COUNTY-established schedule, prepare and
provide to the COUNTY, in a prescribed form, requests for the use of Community Development
Block Grant Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin
County Consolidated Plan.
B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that, pursuant to 24 CFR §570.501 (b), it is subject to the
same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient
Agreement set forth in 24 CFR §570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the
implementation requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly
executed with and in a form prescribed by the COUNTY.
C. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements
stated in paragraph B above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an
activity pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances, a
written Third Party Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING
UNIT in a form prescribed by COUNTY.
D. COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all funds annually allocated to activities pursuant to the
Subrecipient Agreement.
1. All funds not expended pursuant to the terms of the Subrecipient Agreement will be
relinquished to the COUNTY and will be transferred to a separate account for reallocation
on a competitive request for proposal basis at the discretion of the COUNTY where total
of such funds is $100,000 or greater. Amounts less than $100,000 shall be allocated by
COUNTY to other existing activities consistent with timeliness requirements and
Consolidated Plan goals.
E. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all program income pursuant to this
Agreement as provided below:
1. Program income from housing rehabilitation activities administered by the COUNTY will
be incorporated into a pool at the discretion of the COUNTY. The pool will be
administered by COUNTY and will be used for housing rehabilitation projects located
throughout the entire Urban County. When possible, COUNTY will give priority to
funding housing rehabilitation projects within the COOPERATING UNIT where the
program income was generated. Funds expended in this manner would be secured by a
Repayment Agreement/Mortgage running in favor of the COUNTY. Program income
generated by certainMETROPOLITAN CITY COOPERATING UNITS that administer
their own housing rehabilitation activities may be retained by the COOPERATING UNIT
at its discretion; however, such COOPERATING UNITS will be bound by the conditions
of D.2., above. Only COOPERATING UNITS that were administering their own
activities pursuant to the Joint Cooperation Agreement pertaining to the HUD fiscal years
2012-2014 will be eligible to retain their program income..
2. COUNTY reserves the option to recapture program income generated by non-housing
rehabilitation activities if said funds have not been expended within twelve (12) months of
being generated. These funds shall be transferred to a separate account for reallocation on
a competitive request for proposal basis administered by COUNTY or, where the total of
such funds does not exceed $100,000, shall be reallocated by COUNTY to other existing
activities consistent with timeliness requirements and Consolidated Plan goals.
5
F. COOPERATING UNITS are encouraged to undertake joint activities involving the sharing of
funding when such action furthers the goals of the Consolidated Plan and meets the expenditure
goals.
G. If COUNTY is notified by HUD that it has not met the performance standard for the timely
expenditure of funds at 24 CFR 570.902(a) and the COUNTY entitlement grant is reduced by
HUD according to its policy on corrective actions, then the basic grant amount to any
COOPERATING UNIT that has not met its expenditure goal shall be reduced accordingly.
H. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to assist in accomplishing the community
development program and housing goals, as contained in the Urban Hennepin County
Consolidated Plan, and will comply with COUNTY’s direction to redirect the use of funds when
necessary to accomplish said goals.
I. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all activities funded, in part or in full by grant funds
received pursuant to this Agreement, shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair housing,
employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall, in implementing all
programs and/or activities funded by the basic grant amount, comply with all applicable Federal
and Minnesota Laws, statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights, affirmative action
and equal employment opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY.
J. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges the recommendations set forth in the current Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further
fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair
housing certification shallcertifications to HUD may be prohibited from receiving part or all
CDBG funding for anyits activities, and may be required to reimburse COUNTY for part or all of
funds it has received.
K. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process, as established by
COUNTY, in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974, as amended.
L. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY for any expenditure determined by HUD or
COUNTY to be ineligible.
M. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the
interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY.
N. COOPERATING UNIT has adopted and is enforcing:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its
jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to
or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights
demonstrations within its jurisdiction.
O. COOPERATING UNIT shall not sell, trade, or otherwise transfer all or any portion of grant funds
to
another metropolitan city, urban county, unit of general local government, or Indian tribe, or
insular area that directly or indirectly receives CDBG funds in exchange for any other funds,
6
credits or non-Federal considerations, but must use such funds for activities eligible under Title I
of the Act.
COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows:
A. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies, on an annual
basis, all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount
under the Act.
B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating
services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of a request for funding.
C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY
in fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program
and housing goals.
D. COUNTY shall, upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer local
housing rehabilitation activities funded pursuant to the Agreement, provided that COUNTY shall
receive Twelve percent (12%) of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as
reimbursement for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity.
E. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to
administer, for a possible fee, other activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of
COOPERATING UNIT.
F. COUNTY may, as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration, develop
and implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations, HUD administrative
directives, and administrative requirements of COUNTY; and COOPERATING UNIT shall
comply with said Administrative Rules.
V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS
Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under Section 106 of the Act shall be allocated as
follows:
A. Planning and administration costs are capped to 20 percent of the sum of the basic grant amount
plus program income that is received during the program year. During the term of this Agreement
the COUNTY anticipateswill receive a planning and administrative retainage of thirteenup to
fifteen percent (13-15%);%) of the basic grant amount included in this administrative amount is
funding for annual county-wide Fair Housing activities.
B. Funding for public service activities are capped to 15 percent of the sum of the basic grant amount
plus program income that is received during the previous program year. During the term of this
Agreement the COUNTY will retain up to 15% of the basic grant amount for allocation to public
service activities county-wide. Funds retained for public service activities will be awarded in a
manner determined by COUNTY on a competitive request for proposal basis.
B.C. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be made available by COUNTY to COOPERATING
UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part CD and the procedure stated in part DE of
this section utilizing U.S. Census Bureau data. The allocation is for planning purposes only and is
not a guarantee of funding.
7
C.D. Allocation of funding will be based upon a formula using U.S. Census Bureau data that bears the
same ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between:
1. The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING
UNITS.
2. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all
COOPERATING UNITS.
3. The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of
overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS.
4. In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio involving the extent of poverty
shall be counted twice.
DE. Funds will be made available to communities utilizing the formula specified in C of this Section in
the following manner:
1. All COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of greater than three and
one half percent (3.5%) of the total using the procedure in part C. of this sectionwhich are
also METROPOLITAN CITIES will receive funding allocations in accordance with the
COUNTY formula allocations.
2. All COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of three and one
halfgreater than five percent (5%) of the total using the procedure in part D. of this section
will receive funding allocations in accordance with the COUNTY formula allocations,
unless the resulting allocation would total less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars
($100,000.00).
3. COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of five percent (5%) or less
of the total using the procedure in part CD. of this section or with funding allocations of
less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) will have their funds consolidated
into a pool for award in a manner determined by COUNTY on a competitive request for
proposal basis. Only the COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS whose funding has been
pooled will be eligible to compete for these funds.
E4. COOPERATING UNITS shall have the option to opt-in to the consolidated pool specified
in item 3. of this part by providing written notice to COUNTY by November 15th annually.
F. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. the U.S. Census
Bureau. The COUNTY assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability
for any errors in the data furnished by HUD.
FG. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request a funding allocation, or a portion thereof, the
amount not requested shall be made available to other participating communities, in a manner
determined by COUNTY.
VI. METROPOLITAN CITIES
8
Any metropolitan city executing this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of
Urban Hennepin County.
This agreement can be voided if the COOPERATING UNIT is advised by HUD, prior to the
completion of the re-qualification process for fiscal years 2015-20172018-2020, that it is newly eligible to
become a metropolitan city and the COOPERATING UNIT elects to take its entitlement status. If the
agreement is not voided on the basis of the COOPERATING UNIT’s eligibility as a metropolitan city prior to
June 20, 2014July 16, 2017, the COOPERATING UNIT must remain a part of the COUNTY program for the
entire three-year period of the COUNTY qualification.
VII. OPINION OF COUNSEL
The undersigned, on behalf of the Hennepin County Attorney, having reviewed this Agreement, hereby
opines that the terms and provisions of the Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and that
the COOPERATING UNIT has full legal authority to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community
development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly-assisted housing.
__________________________________________
Assistant County Attorney
9
VIII. HENNEPIN COUNTY EXECUTION
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on ____________,
20142017, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement, the
COUNTY agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By: __________________________________________
Chair of its County Board
_______________________________
Assistant County Attorney Attest: ________________________________________
And: __________________________________________
Date: Assistant/Deputy/County Administrator
Attest: _________________________________________
Deputy/ Clerk of the County Board
Date:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
__________________________________________
By: __________________________________________
County Administrator
Date:
By: __________________________________________
Assistant County Administrator -– Public Works
Date:
Recommended for Approval:
________________________________________
Director Date: _______________________
__________________________________________
Department, Housing, Community Works and Transit
Date:
10
11
IX. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION
COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the COOPERATING UNIT'S governing
body having duly approved this Agreement on , 20142017, and pursuant to such approval and
the proper city official having signed this Agreement, COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the
provisions of this Joint Cooperation Agreement.
CITY OF
By:
Its Mayor
And:
Its City Manager
ATTEST:
CITY MUST CHECK ONE:
The City is organized pursuant to:
Plan A Plan B Charter
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.H.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Mark K. No lan, Trans p o rtatio n P lanner
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Traffic S afety R ep o rt of May 3, 2017 Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
R eview and approve the T raffic Safety Report of M ay 3, 2017.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
T he E dina Transportation C ommission (E T C ) reviewed the M ay 3, 2017 T raffic S afety R eport at their May 18
meeting and moved to forward the report to the C ity C ouncil for approval; see attached draft minutes.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Staff Report: Traffic Safety Report of May 3, 2017
Draft ETC Minutes , May 18, 2017
June 20, 2017
City Council
Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator
Traffic Safety Report of May 3, 2017
Information / Background:
The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 3. The Transportation
Planner, City Engineer, Assistant City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Public Works Director and Traffic
Safety Specialist were in attendance for this meeting. The Police Lieutenant was not able to attend, was
informed of the decisions and did not object to the recommendations.
For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have
been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if
they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included
on the May 18 Edina Transportation Commission and the June 20 City Council meeting agendas.
Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action:
A1. A resident from the Highlands neighborhood
requested lowering the speed limit on Ayrshire Blvd
to 20 MPH.
• The resident making this request would also
like to move the speed limit sign for
northbound traffic for vehicles entering from
Vernon Ave
• Ayrshire Blvd is a two-lane two-way street
labeled as a ‘Local Connector’
• The North and Southbound stretch of
Ayrshire is separated by a median south of
Glenbrae Cir
• Northbound 85% speed between both
Map: Location of current speed
limit sign. The red bars symbolize
the locations of collected data 30
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Photo: Link Rd and Vernon Ave showing
current signage shows Eden Ave, no Link Rd
entrances of Glenbrae Cir was 31.6 MPH
• Northbound 85% speed between Lochloy Dr and Glenbrae Cir slowed to 28.6 MPH
• North and southbound ADT is 517
After review, staff recommends adding a new speed limit sign for northbound traffic
near the southern intersection of Glenbrae Cir and Ayrshire Blvd in the center grass-
island. Adding this sign should inform vehicles traveling northbound on Ayrshire Blvd of
the speed limit up to three blocks sooner than current speed limit sign. Staff
recommends the speed limit on Ayrshire Blvd to remain at 30 MPH given state statute
requirements.
A2. A resident requests new traffic controls due to
inadequate sight lines at Lakeview Drive and Golf
Terrace
• This is a three-leg intersection as the only
controlled leg is for eastbound vehicles.
• Average vehicles through this intersection is
1,300.
• Uncontrolled traffic make up 57% of vehicles
entering the intersection.
• Line of sight as this intersection appears
appropriate.
After review, staff recommends placing a sign below the eastbound stop sign informing
traffic from north and south does not stop.
A3. A request to rename Link Road to Eden Avenue, and continue Sherwood Road up to Eden
Avenue
• A resident requested to make Eden Ave run
west up to Vernon Ave as people would be
informed by GPS units to turn from Vernon
Ave onto Link Rd.
• Link Rd has no signage at Vernon Ave or on
Eden Ave.
• Eden Ave transitions into Sherwood Rd at
the west exit of Grandview Square Park.
• Eden Ave and Link Rd are listed as ‘Connector Streets’
• Vernon Ave is listed as a “Minor Arterial Street”
• In April, the Traffic Safety Committee recommended the resident file a petition to City
Council in regards to the removal of Link Rd
• Link Rd has no listed addresses
• The petition was submitted to and received by City Council and included signatures of 11
residents. City Council did not object to renaming the street.
Map: Location Lakeview Dr and Golf Terrace
STAFF REPORT Page 3
After review, staff recommends removing the “Link Road” designation and renaming
that section Eden Ave. Staff also recommends extending Sherwood Rd north to Eden
Ave. As required, a public hearing will be held regarding renaming of these roads.
Section B: Items which staff recommends for no action
B1. A resident requested new traffic control as traffic has increased on Highway 100 East Frontage
Road
• Resident located at 6617 Normandale Rd is
looking for similar treatment on
Normandale Rd as the Parkwood Knolls
neighborhood received following the traffic
increase due to the Highway 169 closure.
• Normandale Rd is a northbound one-way
street with one lane
• Normandale Rd is classified as a ‘Collector
Street’
• ADT on Normandale Rd in September 2012
was 1,678 with 85% speed of 36.8
• ADT on Normandale Rd in April 2017 was
1,714 with 85% speed of 37.8
• PM peak hour in 2012 was 272
• PM peak hour in 2017 was 386
After review, staff recommends no action as the traffic increase did not warrant any
new controls.
Map: Location of Highway 100 East Frontage Road/
Normandale Rd
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Section C: Items which staff recommends for further study
C1. A request to place ‘No U-Turn’ signs on Valley View Road to prevent westbound drivers from
making U-turns during school peak hours
• Drivers dropping students at Valley View
Middle School drop off area are making U-
turns to travel eastbound
• Valley View Rd has a morning peak hour of
969 vehicles at 7:30
• Between 6:45 am and 7:45 am, 50 vehicles
made U-turns after dropping off students
• Between 2:30 pm and 3 pm, 7 vehicles made
U-turns
• PM peak hour at 3:15 had zero vehicles making U-turns
After review, staff recommends discussing this item at a later date. Staff would like to
discuss this item with a representative from the Police Department.
Section D: Other Traffic Safety Items handled
D1. A resident on St. Johns Avenue requested traffic calming on their road, as they believe average speeds
are too high. Following a traffic study, the average speeds on St. Johns Ave are 29 MPH. This neighborhood
will continue being monitored.
D2. A resident had a complaint of too many vehicles parking on Valley View Road near Dakota Trail. Upon
review, this stretch of Valley View Rd allows parking with no line of sight issues. This will continue to be
monitored.
D3. A resident was looking for traffic counts on Dunberry Lane and West Shore Drive to compare
information to W. 70th St.
D4. A resident was concerned with vehicles parking too close to the intersection of Wyman Avenue and W.
63rd Street. After inspecting, vehicles maintained an adequate distance from the intersection.
D5. A resident called to request temporary no-parking signs near Highlands Park for an upcoming soccer
camp. This request was forwarded to the Police Department.
D6. A resident requested a traffic safety issue with the increased traffic on Blake Rd. The Traffic Safety
Committee labeled this as a repeat request as it was recommended to increase police patrol along Blake Rd.
D7. A resident complained about traffic not stopping at stop signs on Schaefer Rd north of View Ln. This
request was forwarded to the Police Department.
D8. A resident informed traffic safety about a wooden fence that was broken along Hansen Rd near Garden
Park. This was forwarded to Public Works and has been fixed.
Map: Location where vehicles are making U-turns on
Valley View Rd in front of Valley View Middle School
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
1
Minutes
City of Edina, Minnesota
Transportation Commission
Community Room
May 18, 2017, 6:00 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Chair LaForce called the meeting to order.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call were commissioners Ahler, Brown, Iyer, Kane, LaForce, Miranda, Olson, Richman and
Ruthruff.
Absent: Commissioners Koester and Olk.
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion was made by commissioner Miranda and seconded by commissioner Richman approving the
meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion passed.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion was made by commissioner Miranda and seconded by commissioner Olson approving the revised
Apr. 20, 2017, minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried.
V. Community Comments – None
VI. Reports/Recommendations
D. Traffic Safety Report of May 3, 2017
A.I. Planner Nolan clarified that they are not planning to lower the speed limit.
Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner Ahler to forward the May 3,
2017, TSC report to Council with the clarification. All voted aye. Motion passed.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.I.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R eq uest F or P urc has e
F rom:Ryan Bro wning, I.T. Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:R eques t fo r P urchas e: S erver R ep lac ement Action
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve the purchase of four new servers.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
T his is a request for purchase for four servers to handle the C ity’s data serving needs. T he existing servers have
reached the end of their useful life and we need additional server capacity. T hese servers will have a three-year
lifespan.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Reques t for Purchas e: Server Replacement
Request for Purchase
Date: June 20, 2017
To: Mayor & City Council Members
From: Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager
Subject: Request for Purchase: Server Replacement
M List Quote/Bid The
Purchase NWithin Budget El State Contract Recommended
Subject to: 0 Not Within Budget
iii Service Contract Bid is:
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
June 1, 2017 N/A
Company:
Insight Public Sector
Software House International
Amount of Quote or Bid:
$35,1 14.32
$45,606.00
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Insight Public Sector $35,114.32
City of Edina • 4801 W. 506 St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Budget Impact
This is a request for purchase for four servers to handle the City's data serving needs. The existing servers
have reached the end of their useful life and we need additional server capacity. These servers will have a
3-year lifespan.
This expense will be paid for through capital and utility funds and is within budget. Staff recommends we
proceed with this purchase.
Environmental Impact
It is expected that these servers will provide increased energy efficiency over our existing servers.
Community Impact
Theses servers power the majority of the City's server operations and have a direct impact on the daily
work of most employees and many residents.
Department Director Authorization: vt)P-aurvnaeZes4.
City Council Authorization Date: (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.J.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R eq uest F or P urc has e
F rom:Ryan Bro wning, I.T. Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:R eques t fo r P urchas e: Microsoft Enterp ris e
Agreement
Action
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve the payment for the second year of the M icrosoft E nterprise Agreement.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
T his is the second year of a three-year agreement with M icrosoft for the licensing of our current (365) E nterprise
S oftware Agreement licenses. T his contract allows the C ity the ability to upgrade server software and O ffice
S uite software for its employees for the life of our three-year contract.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Reques t for Purchas e: Micros oft Enterpris e Agreement
Request for Purchase
Date: June 20, 2017
To: Mayor & City Council Members
From: Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager
Subject: Request for Purchase: Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal
El List Quote/Bid The
Purchase El Within Budget
lil State Contract Recommended
Subject to: ONot Within Budget
El Service Contract Bid is:
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
June 6, 2017 N/A
Company:
Amount of Quote or Bid:
Software House International
$49,838.60
Minnesota State Contract No. 48196 release C1046(5)
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Software House International - Minnesota State Contract No. 48196 release C 1046(5) $49,838.60
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Budget Impact
This is the second year of a three-year agreement with Microsoft for the licensing of our current Enterprise
Software Agreement licenses (356). This contract allows the City the ability to upgrade server software and
Office Suite software for its employees for the life of our three-year contract.
This expense will be paid for out of the General Fund and is within budget. Staff recommends we proceed
with this agreement.
Environmental Impact
This purchase is not expected to have an environmental impact.
Community Impact
The community benefits by a more efficient workforce with standardization, software upgrades for the life
of the contract, priority Microsoft support and City-wide system compatibility.
Department Director Authorization:
City Council Authorization Date: (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.K.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:C had A. Millner, P E, Direc tor of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Mas ter S ervic es Agreement with S R F
C ons ulting G ro up, Inc .
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve M aster S ervices Agreement with S R F C onsulting G roup, I nc.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
S R F has completed a variety of transportation related studies in the past. During the last year, we have had to
revisit and update some of those studies. T his agreement allows us to have a understanding between parties and
have the ability to hire them for more projects in a timely manner.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Mas ter Agreement
MASTER AGREEMENT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
AGREEMENT made this June 13, 2017, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, hereinafter called the "OWNER", and SRF CONSULTING
GROUP, INC., a Minnesota business corporation, hereinafter called the "ENGINEER". OWNER
intends to secure professional ENGINEERING services, according to the terms of this Agreement.
I. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
OWNER intends to secure professional consulting engineering, architectural, planning and/or land
survey services on an ongoing basis for general City services and multiple projects, according to the
terms of this agreement. OWNER and ENGINEER shall enter into project specific supplemental
agreements. This Master Agreement shall be deemed incorporated into the Supplemental
Agreements unless a Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that it is not incorporated. If
there is a conflict between the terms of the Supplemental Agreement and the Master Agreement, the
terms of the Master Agreement shall control unless the Supplemental Agreement specifically
provides that despite the conflict the terms of the Supplemental Agreement apply.
2. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER
2.1 STUDY AND REPORT PHASE / FEASIBILITY REPORT
2.1.1. Consult with OWNER to clarify and define OWNER'S requirements for the Project,
review available data and attend necessary meetings and be available for general consultation.
2.1.2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER'S providing or obtaining from
others data or services of the types described in paragraph 4, and assist OWNER in obtaining such
data and services.
2.1.3. Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to
approve the design of the Project and participate in consultations with such authorities.
2.1.4. Provide analyses of OWNER'S needs, planning surveys, site evaluations and
comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions.
2.1.5. Provide a general economic analysis of OWNER'S requirements applicable to
various alternatives.
2.1.6. The ENGINEER shall conduct and prepare preliminary studies, layouts, sketches,
preliminary field work, preliminary cost estimates, estimates of assessment rates, and shall assist the
OWNER in obtaining required subsurface investigations as required for the preparation of the
Feasibility Reports. The Feasibility Reports shall conform to the requirements of Minn. Stat.
Chapter 429 if the cost of the project may be assessed in whole or part. The report shall contain
Doc. #170480v.1
RNK: 5/23/2013
schematic layouts, sketches and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to indicate
clearly the considerations involved (including applicable requirements of governmental authorities
having jurisdiction as aforesaid) and the alternative solutions available to OWNER and setting forth
ENGINEERS findings and recommendations. This Report will be accompanied by ENGINEER'S
opinion of probable costs for the Project, including the following which will be separately itemized:
construction cost and indirect cost consisting of engineering costs and contingencies, and (on the
basis of information furnished by OWNER) allowances for such other items as charges of all other
professionals and consultants, for the cost of land and rights-of-way, for compensation for or
damages to properties, for interest and financing charges and for other services to be provided by
others for OWNER. The total of all construction and indirect costs are hereinafter called "Total
Project Costs".
2.1.7. Furnish five (5) printed copies of the Study and Report documents and one (1)
electronic file and review them in person with OWNER.
2.1.8. The ENGINEER shall assist with presenting the Feasibility Reports to the proper
reviewing agencies and to the City Council. The ENGINEER shall appear at the public hearing to
present the information.
2.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE
2.2.1. In consultation with OWNER and on the basis of the accepted Study and Report
documents, determine the general scope, extent and character of the Project; attend necessary
meetings and be available for general consultation.
2.2.2. Prepare Preliminary Design documents consisting of final design criteria,
preliminary drawings, outline specifications and written descriptions of the Project.
2.2.3. Advise OWNER if additional data or services of the types described in paragraph
4.4 are necessary and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services.
2.2.4. Based on the information contained in the Preliminary Design documents, submit a
revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs.
2.2.5. Furnish preliminary legal descriptions and exhibits for all permanent and temporary
easements anticipated to construct the Project.
2.2.6. Furnish three (3) copies of the above Preliminary Design documents and one (1)
electronic copy and present and review them in person with OWNER
2.3 FINAL DESIGN PHASE
2.3.1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Design documents, the City's design
standards, and the revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs prepare for incorporation in the
Bidding Documents final drawings to show the general scope, extent and character of the work to
be furnished and performed by Contractor(s) (hereinafter called "Plans") and Specifications.
Doc. #170480v.1
2
RNK: 5/23/2013
2.3.2. Provide technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for use in filing
applications for permits with or obtaining approvals of such governmental authorities as have
jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project, and assist OWNER in consultations with
appropriate authorities. The ENGINEER shall submit all applications and permit support data to the
appropriate agencies and submit copies to the OWNER.
2.3.3. Based on property information received from Owner in accordance with Paragraph
4.4, provide legal descriptions and exhibits for all easements, property surveys or related
engineering services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design
purposes and engineering surveys and staking to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with their work.
2.3.4. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project
Costs caused by changes in general scope, extent or character or design requirements of the Project
or Construction Costs. Furnish to OWNER a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs based
on the Plans and Specifications.
2.3.5. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors
contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where
appropriate) bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of
other related documents.
2.3.6. Attend necessary hearings and meetings and be available for general consultation.
2.3.7. Furnish three (3) copies of the listed Final Design documents, including the Plans
and Specifications, and present and review them in person with OWNER.
2.3.8. The ENGINEER shall furnish one copy of all design calculations when requested by
OWNER.
2.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATING PHASE
2.4.1. The ENGINEER shall prepare and forward the Advertisement for Bids to the
designated publications, official newspaper and the OWNER. The ENGINEER shall supply up to
thirty (30) sets of full size final Plans and Specifications for use in obtaining bids and submitting for
general review. The ENGINEER shall maintain a record of prospective bidders to whom Bidding
Documents have been issued, attend pre-bid meetings and receive and process deposits for Bidding
Documents.
2.4.2. Prepare Contract Documents.
2.4.3. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify or expand the Bidding Documents.
2.4.4. Consult with and advise OWNER as to the acceptability of the prime contractor and
subcontractors, suppliers, and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s)
(herein called "Contractor(s)") for the portions of the work where acceptability is required by the
Bidding Documents.
Doc. #170480v.1
3
RNK: 5/23/2013
2.4.5. Consult with and advise OWNER concerning and determining the acceptability of
substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitution prior to the award
of contracts is allowed by the Bidding Documents.
2.4.6. Attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets and assist OWNER in
evaluating bidder qualifications and recommendations on bids, and in assembling and awarding
contracts for construction, materials, equipment and services.
2.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE
2.5.1. General Administration of Construction Contract. ENGINEER shall consult with
and advise OWNER and act as OWNER'S representative. All of OWNER'S instructions to
Contractor(s) will be issued through ENGINEER who will have authority to act on behalf of Owner
to the extent provided in the General Conditions except as otherwise provided in writing. The
General Conditions shall not be modified without the written agreement of the OWNER.
2.5.2. Visits to Site and Observation of Construction. In connection with observations of
the work of Contractor(s) while it is in progress:
2.5.2.1. ENGINEER shall make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the
various stages of construction as ENGINEER deems necessary in order
to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the
progress and quality of the various aspects of Contractor(s) work. In
addition, if requested by OWNER, ENGINEER shall provide the
services of a Resident Project Representative (and assistants as agreed) at
the site to assist ENGINEER and to provide more continuous
observation of such work. Based on information obtained during such
visits and on such observations, ENGINEER shall endeavor to determine
in general if the work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract
Documents and ENGINEER shall keep OWNER informed of the
progress of the work.
2.5.2.2. The Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be
ENGINEER'S agent or employee and under ENGINEER'S supervision.
2.5.2.3. The purpose of the ENGINEER'S visits to and representation by the
Resident Project Representative (and assistants, if any) at the site will be
to enable ENGINEER to better carry out the duties and responsibilities
assigned to and undertaken by ENGINEER during the Construction
Phase, and, in addition, by exercise of ENGINEER'S efforts as an
experienced and qualified design professional, to provide for OWNER a
greater degree of confidence that the completed work of Contractor(s)
will conform to the Contract Documents and that the integrity of the
design concept as reflected in the Contract Documents has been
implemented and preserved by Contractor(s). On the other hand,
ENGINEER shall not, during such visits or as a result of such
observations of Contractor(s)' work in progress, supervise, direct, or have
Doc. #170480v.1
4
RNK: 5/23/2013
control over Contractor(s)' work, nor shall ENGINEER have control or
charge of and shall not be responsible for the Contractor(s)' means,
methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected
by Contractor(s), for safety precautions and programs incident to the
work of Contractor(s) or for any failure of Contractor(s) to comply with
laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes, or orders applicable to
Contractor(s) furnishing and performing their work. Accordingly,
ENGINEER can neither guarantee the performance of the construction
contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume responsibility for Contractor(s)'
failure to furnish and perform their work in accordance with the Contract
Documents.
2.5.2.4. If ENGINEER observes or otherwise becomes aware of defects or
deficiencies in the work, or nonconformance to the Contract Documents,
ENGINEER shall promptly give written notice thereof to OWNER.
2.5.3. Defective Work. During such visits and on the basis of such observation,
ENGINEER may disapprove of or reject Contractor(s) work while it is in progress if ENGINEER
believes that such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the
Contract Documents or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the Project as
reflected in the Contract Documents.
2.5.4. Interpretations and Clarifications. ENGINEER shall issue necessary interpretations
and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare work directive
changes and change orders as required for OWNER'S approval.
2.5.5. Shop Drawings. ENGINEER shall review and approve (or take other appropriate
action in respect of) Shop Drawings, samples and other data which Contractor(s) are required to
submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the
information given in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action shall not
extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety
precautions and programs incident thereto.
2.5.6. Substitutes. ENGINEER shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute
materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s).
2.5.7. Inspections and Tests. ENGINEER shall have authority, as OWNER'S
representative, to require special inspection or testing of the work by Contractor, and shall receive
and review all certificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations,
ordinances, codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their
content complies with the requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the
Contract Documents). ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely on the results of such tests.
2.5.8. ENGINEER shall respond to all written claims submitted by Contractor in a timely
fashion. ENGINEER shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretations or decisions
rendered in good faith.
Doc. #170480v.1 5
RNK: 5/23/2013
2.5.9. Applications for Payment. Based on ENGINEER'S on-site observations as an
experienced and qualified design professional, on information provided by the Resident Project
Representative and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and
schedules:
2.5.9.1. ENGINEER shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and
recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts and
the OWNER shall verify the amounts. Such recommendations of
payment will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such
observations and review, that the work has progressed to the point
indicated, and that, to the best of ENGINEER'S knowledge, information
and belief, the quality of such work is generally in accordance with the
Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a
functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results
of any subsequent tests called for in the Contract Documents and to any
other qualifications stated in the recommendation). In the case of unit
price work, ENGINEER'S recommendations of payment will include
final determinations of quantities and classifications of such work
(subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Contract
Documents).
2.5.9.2. By recommending any payment ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed
to have represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or
examinations have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or
quantity of Contractor(s)' work as it is furnished and performed beyond
the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in this
Agreement and the Contract Documents. ENGINEER'S review of
Contractor(s)' work for the purposes of recommending payment will not
impose on ENGINEER responsibility to supervise, direct or control such
work or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of
construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or
Contractor(s)' compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances,
codes or orders applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It
will also not impose on ENGINEER responsibility to make any
examination to ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has
used the money paid on account of the Contract Price, or to determine
that title to any of the work, materials or equipment has passed to
OWNER free and clear of any lien, claims, security interests or
encumbrances, or that there may not be other matters at issue between
OWNER and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be
paid.
2.5.10. Contractor(s)' Completion Documents. ENGINEER shall receive and review
maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of insurance,
tests and approvals which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract
Documents (but such review will only be to determine that their content complies with the
requirements of, and in the case of certificates on inspection, tests and approvals the results certified
Doc. #170480v.1 6
RNK: 5/23/2013
indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents); and shall transmit them to OWNER with
written comments.
2.5.11. Inspections. ENGINEER shall conduct an inspection to determine if the work is
substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the completed work is acceptable so
that ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, final payment to Contractor(s) and give written notice
to OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein
expressed), but any such recommendation and notice will be subject to the limitations expressed in
paragraph 2.5.5.
2.5.12. Limitation of Responsibilities. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or
omissions of any Contractor, or of any subcontractor or supplier, or any of the Contractor(s)' or
subcontractors' or suppliers' agents or employees of any other persons (except ENGINEER'S own
employees and agents) at the site or otherwise furnishing or performing any of the Contractor(s)'
work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 2.5.1 through 2.5.12 inclusive, shall be construed
to release ENGINEER from liability for failure to properly perform duties and responsibilities
assumed by ENGINEER in the Contract Documents.
2.6 OPERATIONAL PHASE
2.6.1. Provide assistance in the closing of any financial or related transaction for the
Project.
2.6.2. Provide assistance in connection with the refining and adjusting of any equipment or
system.
2.6.3. Assist OWNER in training OWNER'S staff to operate and maintain the Project.
Extensive training shall be mutually agreed upon within the Supplemental Agreement as Additional
Services as defined in Section 3 of this agreement.
2.6.4. Assist OWNER in developing systems and procedures for control of the operation
and maintenance of and record keeping for the Project.
2.6.5. Within ninety (90) days after completion of a Project, prepare a set of reproducible
record prints of Drawings and an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record Drawing
requirements, attached hereto, showing those changes made during the construction process, based
on the marked-up prints, drawings and other data furnished by Contractor(s) to ENGINEER and
which ENGINEER considered significant. ENGINEER will not be responsible for any errors or
omissions in the information provided by Contractor that is incorporated in the record drawings and
record documents. Final payment will be made only after record drawings are received by the
OWNER.
2.6.6. In company with OWNER, visit the Project to observe any apparent defects in the
completed construction, assist OWNER in consultations and discussions with Contractor(s)
concerning correction of such deficiencies, and make recommendations as to replacement or
correction of defective work.
Doe. #170480v.1 7
RNK: 5/23/2013
2.6.7. Assist OWNER in preparation of assessment roll for City improvement projects, and
attend assessment hearings.
3. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER
3.1 SERVICES REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. If authorized in writing by
OWNER, ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in
paragraphs 3.1.1 through 3.1.12, inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Services
except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement or Work Order and
will be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Section 6.
3.1.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (in addition to those furnished
under Basic Services) for private or governmental grants, loans or advances in connection with the
Project; preparation or review of environmental assessments and impact statements; review and
evaluation of the effect on the design requirements of the Project of any such statements and
documents prepared by others; and assistance in obtaining approvals of authorities having
jurisdiction over the anticipated environmental impact of the Project.
3.1.2. Field Services to make measured drawings of or to investigate existing conditions or
facilities, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished to OWNER by others,
including surveys to verify location or improve accuracy of record information provided by
Contractor under Paragraph 2.6.5.
3.1.3. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character
of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER'S
schedule, character of construction or method of financing; and revising previously accepted
studies, reports, design documents or Contract Documents when such revisions are required by
changes in laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to the
preparation of such studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond
ENGINEER'S control.
3.1.4. Providing renderings or models for OWNER'S use.
3.1.5. Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by OWNER for Contractor(s)'
work which is not executed or documents for out-of-sequence work.
3.1.6. Investigations and studies involving, but not limited to, detailed consideration of
operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; providing value engineering during the course of
design; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules
and appraisals; assistance in obtaining financing for the Project; evaluating processes available for
licensing; assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing; detailed quantity surveys of material,
equipment and labor; and audits or inventories required in connection with construction performed
by OWNER.
3.1.7. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other
than Basic Services (which include, but are not limited to, customary civil, structural, mechanical
and electrical engineering and customary architectural design incidental thereto); and providing data
Doc. #170480v.1
8
RNK: 5/23/2013
or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 when OWNER employs ENGINEER to provide
such data or services in lieu of furnishing the same in accordance with paragraph 4.4.
3.1.8. Services during out-of-town travel required of ENGINEER other than visits to the
site or OWNER'S office.
3.1.9. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for
construction, materials, equipment or services, except when such assistance is required to complete
services called for in paragraph 2.4.
3.1.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals to supplement Basic
Services under paragraph 2.5.10.
3.1.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for OWNER in any
litigation, arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project unless the
ENGINEER is a defendant (except for assistance in consultations which is included as part of Basic
Services.
3.1.12. Additional services in connection with the Project, including services which are to
be furnished by OWNER in accordance with Section 4, and services not otherwise provided for in
this Agreement.
3.2 SERVICES NOT REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. When required by the
Contract Documents in circumstances beyond ENGINEER'S control, ENGINEER shall furnish or
obtain from others, as circumstances require during construction and without waiting for specific
authorization from OWNER, Additional Services listed in paragraphs 3.2.1 through 3.2.5, inclusive.
These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by
attached Supplemental Agreement. ENGINEER shall advise OWNER promptly after starting any
such additional services which will be paid for by OWNER.
3.2.1. Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect
changes requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic Services is not
commensurate with the additional services rendered.
3.2.2. Services in making revisions to Plans and Specifications occasioned by the
acceptance of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); and services after the award to each contract
in evaluating and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable or excessive number of
substitutions proposed by Contractor.
3.2.3. Services resulting from significant delays, changes or price increases occurring as a
direct or indirect result of material, equipment or energy shortages.
3.2.4. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (1) work
damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) a significant amount of defective or
neglected work of any Contractor, (3) acceleration of the progress schedule involving services
beyond normal working hours, and (4) default by any Contractor.
Doc. #170480v.1
9
RNK: 5/23/2013
3.2.5. Services (other than Basic Services during the Operational Phase) in connection with
any partial use of any part of the Project by OWNER prior to Substantial Completion.
4. OWNER'S PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES. OWNER
shall do the following:
4.1 Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER'S representative with respect to the services
to be rendered under this Agreement, such person shall have complete authority to transmit
instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER'S policies and decisions with respect
to ENGINEER'S services for the Project.
4.2 Provide criteria and information as to OWNER'S requirements for the Project, including
design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and
expandability, and any budgetary limitations; and furnish copies of design and construction
standards OWNER will require to be included in the Plans and Specifications.
4.3 Assist ENGINEER by placing at ENGINEER'S disposal all available information pertinent
to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the
Project.
4.4 Furnish to ENGINEER as required for performance of ENGINEER'S Basic Services except
to the extent provided otherwise by attached amendment, the following:
4.4.1. Data prepared by or services of others, including without limitation, borings, and
subsurface explorations, hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples,
materials and equipment;
4.4.2. Appropriate professional interpretations of all the foregoing;
4.4.3. Environmental assessment and impact statements, if needed;
4.4.4. Property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and utility surveys;
4.4.5. Property descriptions; and
4.4.6. Zoning, deed and other land use restrictions;
All of which ENGINEER may use and rely upon in performing services under this Agreement.
4.5 Provide engineering surveys or authorize ENGINEER to establish reference points for
construction to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with the layout of the work.
4.6 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public and
private property as required for ENGINEER to perform services under this Agreement.
4.7 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, Drawings, Specifications, proposals and other
documents presented by ENGINEER. Obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other
Doc. #170480v.1 10
RNK: 5/23/2013
consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions
pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of ENGINEER.
4.8 Prepare applications and provide support for approvals and permits from all governmental
authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from others as may
be necessary for completion of the Project.
4.9 Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as
may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER may require or ENGINEER may
reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be
raised by Contractor(s), such auditing service as OWNER may require to ascertain how or for what
purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid under the construction contract, and such
inspection services as OWNER may require to ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any
law, rule, regulations, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishing and performing the
work.
4.10 If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER at the site who is not ENGINEER or
ENGINEER'S agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such
other person and the affect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER and the
Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be set forth in a supplemental agreement.
4.11 If more than one prime contract is to be awarded for construction, materials, equipment and
services for the entire Project, designate a person or organization to have authority and
responsibility for coordinating the activities among the various prime contractors.
4.12 Furnish to ENGINEER data or estimated figures as to OWNER'S anticipated costs for
services to be provided by others for OWNER so that ENGINEER may make the necessary
findings to support opinions of probable Total Project Costs.
4.13 Attend the pre-bid meeting, bid opening, pre-construction meetings, construction progress
and other job related meetings and substantial completion inspections and final payment
inspections.
4.14 Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or otherwise
becomes aware of any development that affects the scope of timing of ENGINEER'S services, or
any defect or nonconformance in the work of any Contractor.
4.15 Furnish, or direct ENGINEER to provide, Additional Services as stipulated in paragraph 3.1
of this Agreement or other services as required.
4.16 Require all Private Utilities with facilities in the OWNER'S right of way to:
(a) Locate and mark said utilities upon request;
(b) Relocate and/or protect said utilities as determined necessary to accommodate the
proposed Work;
(c) Submit a schedule of the necessary relocation/protection activities to the OWNER
for review.
Doc. #170480v.1
11
RNK: 5/23/2013
4.17 Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Section 4.
5. PERIODS OF PROJECT SERVICE
5.1 The provisions of Section 6 and the various rates of compensation for ENGINEER'S
services provided for elsewhere in this Agreement have been agreed to in anticipation of the orderly
and continuous progress of the Project through completion of the Construction Phase.
ENGINEER'S obligation to render services hereunder will extend for a period which may
reasonably be required for the design, award of contracts, construction and initial operation of the
Project including extra work and required extensions thereto.
5.2 The services called for in the Study and Report Phase will be completed and the Report
submitted within the agreed period after written authorization to proceed with that phase of services
which will be given by OWNER.
5.3 After acceptance by OWNER of the Study and Report Phase documents indicating any
specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by
OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, ENGINEER shall proceed with the
performance of the services called for in the Preliminary Design Phase, and shall submit preliminary
design documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs within the agreed period.
5.4 After acceptance by OWNER of the Preliminary Design Phase documents and revised
opinion of probable Total Project Costs, indicating any specific modifications or changes in the
general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization
from OWNER, ENGINEER shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the
Final Design Phase; and shall deliver Contract Documents and a revised opinion of probable Total
Project Costs for all work of Contractor(s) on the Project within the agreed period.
5.5 ENGINEER'S services under the Study and Report Phase, Preliminary Design Phase, and
Final Design Phase, shall each be considered complete when the submissions for that phase have
been accepted by OWNER.
5.6 After acceptance by OWNER of the ENGINEER'S Drawings, Specifications and other
Final Design Phase documentation including the most recent opinion of probable Total Project
Costs and upon written authorization to proceed, ENGINEER shall proceed with performance of the
services called for in the Bidding or Negotiating phase. This Phase shall terminate and the services
to be rendered thereunder shall be considered complete upon commencement of the Construction
Phase or upon cessation of negotiations with prospective Contractor(s).
5.7 The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the first prime contract to be
executed for the work of the Project or any part thereof, and will terminate upon written
recommendation by ENGINEER of final payment on the last prime contract to be completed.
Construction Phase services may be rendered at different times in respect of separate prime
contracts if the Project involves more than one prime contract.
Doc. #170480v.1
12
RNK: 5/23/2013
5.8 The Operational Phase will commence during the Construction Phase and will terminate
upon the last of the following events: (1) one year after the date of Substantial Completion, as
defined in the Contract Documents, if the last prime contract for construction, materials and
equipment on which substantial completion is achieved; (2) after final payment to the Contractor(s);
(3) after all known issues have been satisfactorily resolved.
5.9 If OWNER requests significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or
character of the Project, the time of performance of ENGINEER'S services shall be adjusted
equitably.
5.10 OWNER shall give prompt authorization to proceed or not proceed with any phase of
services after completion of the immediately preceding phase.
5.11 In the event that the work designed or specified by ENGINEER is to be furnished or
performed under more than one prime contract, or if ENGINEER'S services are to be separately
sequenced with the work of one or more prime contractors (such as in the case of fast-tracking),
OWNER and ENGINEER shall, prior to commencement of the Final Design Phase, develop a
schedule for performance of ENGINEER'S services during the Final Design, Bidding or
Negotiating and Construction Phases in order to sequence and coordinate properly such services as
are applicable to the work under such separate contracts.
6. PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER
6.1 PAYMENT. For Project services, ENGINEER will be paid in accordance with the
Supplemental Agreement between the parties for the Project.
6.2 OTHER PROVISIONS CONCERNING PAYMENTS.
6.2.1. If OWNER fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and expenses
within thirty five (35) days after receipt of ENGINEER'S statement therefor, the amounts due
ENGINEER will be increased at the rate of one-half percent (1/2%) per month from said thirtieth
day, and in addition, ENGINEER may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to OWNER,
suspend services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in full all amounts due for
services, expenses and charges.
6.2.2. In the event of termination by OWNER under paragraph 8.1 upon the completion of
any phase of the Basic Services, progress payments due ENGINEER for services rendered through
such phase shall constitute total payment for such services. In the event of such termination by
OWNER during any phase of the Basic Services, ENGINEER will be paid for services actually and
necessarily rendered during that phase by ENGINEER'S principals and employees engaged directly
on the Project, on the basis of ENGINEER'S Hourly Costs based upon the fee schedule on file with
the City.
In the event of any such termination, ENGINEER also will be reimbursed for the reasonable
charges of independent professional associates and consultants employed by ENGINEER to render
Basic Services, and paid for all unpaid Additional Services and unpaid reimbursables.
Doc. #170480v.1 13
RNK: 5/23/2013
6.2.3. Records of ENGINEER'S time pertinent to ENGINEER'S compensation under this
Agreement will be kept in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Copies will be
made available to OWNER at cost on request prior to fmal payment for ENGINEER'S services.
6.2.4. ENGINEER shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. ENGINEER must pay
Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten (10) days of
ENGINEER'S receipt of payment from OWNER. ENGINEER must pay interest of one and five-
tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount
not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid
balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100) or more is Ten Dollars ($10).
7. CONSTRUCTION COST AND OPINIONS OF COST
7.1 CONSTRUCTION COST. The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as
"Construction Cost") means the total cost to OWNER of those portions of the entire Project
designed and specified by ENGINEER, but it will not include indirect costs such as ENGINEER'S
compensation and expenses, the cost of land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or damages to,
properties unless this Agreement so specifies, nor will it include OWNER'S legal, accounting,
insurance counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in connection
with the Project or the cost of other services to be provided by others to OWNER pursuant to
paragraph 4. (Construction Cost is one of the items comprising Total Project Cost which is defined
in paragraph 2.2.6).
7.2 OPINIONS OF COST. Since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials,
equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices,
or over competitive bidding or market conditions, ENGINEER'S opinions of probable Total Project
Costs and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of ENGINEER'S
experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER'S best judgment as an experienced and
qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but ENGINEER cannot and
does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Total Project or Construction Costs will not vary
from opinions of probable cost prepared by ENGINEER.
8. GENERAL
8.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Engineer as an independent
contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Engineer is not an
employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Engineer shall be
responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Engineer shall furnish
any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Engineer's performance under this
Agreement. City and Engineer agree that Engineer shall not at any time or in any manner represent
that Engineer or any of Engineer's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of
the City. Engineer shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Engineer's own FICA
payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding
amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be
paid by law or regulation.
Doc. #170480v.1 14
RNK: 5/23/2013
8.2 TERMINATION. OWNER may terminate this Agreement and any Supplemental
Agreement without cause by written notice delivered to the ENGINEER. Upon termination
under this provision if there is no fault of the ENGINEER, the ENGINEER shall be paid for
services rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date of termination. If however,
the OWNER terminates the Agreement because the ENGINEER has failed to perform in
accordance with this Agreement, no further payment shall be made to the ENGINEER, and the
OWNER may retain another contractor to undertake or complete the work identified in the
Contract Documents. If as a result, the OWNER incurs total costs for the work (including
payments to both the present contractor and a future contractor) which exceed the not to exceed
amount specified in the Contract Documents, if any, then the ENGINEER shall be responsible
for the difference between the cost actually incurred and the Agreement amount.
8.3 DOCUMENTS. All documents including Plans and Specifications prepared or furnished by
ENGINEER (and ENGINEER'S independent professional associates and consultants) pursuant to
this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project and the OWNER will be
provided with information and reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the Project by
OWNER and others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by OWNER or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse without
written verification or adaptation by ENGINEER for the specific purpose intended will be at
OWNER'S sole risk. If the OWNER or ENGINEER terminates this Agreement, copies of all files,
records, and drawings in ENGINEER'S possession relating to service performance for OWNER
shall be turned over to OWNER without cost to OWNER.
8.4 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. The ENGINEER must
comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it
applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created,
collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the ENGINEER pursuant to this
Agreement. The ENGINEER is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data
Practices Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as
if it were a government entity. In the event the ENGINEER receives a request to release data, the
ENGINEER must immediately notify the OWNER. The OWNER will give the ENGINEER
instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released and
the ENGINEER will be reimbursed as Additional Public Improvement Services by OWNER under
Paragraph 3.1for ENGINEER'S reasonable costs in complying with a request to release data.
ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the OWNER, its officials, officers, agents,
employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from ENGINEER'S officers',
agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful
disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or
termination of this Agreement.
8.5 INSURANCE
8.5.1. ENGINEER shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect ENGINEER
from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for
bodily injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under
this Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than:
Doc. #170480v.1
15
RNK: 5/23/2013
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate
Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit
Excess/Umbrella Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate
The OWNER shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and umbrella policies
on a primary and non-contributory basis. That part of the Excess/Umbrella Liability Insurance limit
in excess of the required Excess/Umbrella coverage may be utilized to supplement and meet the
required limits for Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance.
8.5.2. Professional Liability Insurance. The ENGINEER shall secure and maintain a
professional liability insurance policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damages for legal
liability arising out of the performance of professional services for the OWNER, in the insured's
capacity as ENGINEER, if such legal liability is caused by a negligent act, error or omission of the
insured or any person or organization for which the insured is legally liable. Said policy shall
provide minimum limits of $1,000,000 each claim/annual aggregate. The certificate shall provide
30 days' notice of cancellation to OWNER.
8.5.3. Before commencing work the ENGINEER shall provide the OWNER a certificate
of insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to OWNER. The
certificate shall provide 30 days' written notice in event of cancellation; 10 days' written notice of
cancellation for non-payment of premium to OWNER.
8.6 INDEMNIFICATION. The ENGINEER agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to
indemnify and hold OWNER harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable
attorney's fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by ENGINEER' s negligent acts, errors, or
omissions in the performance of professional services under this Agreement and those of his or her
subcontractors or anyone for whom the ENGINEER is legally liable.
8.7 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS. ENGINEER shall exercise the same degrees of care,
skill, and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a
professional engineer under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is
included in this Agreement. ENGINEER shall comply with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances,
and regulations and the OWNER' s mandated standards that OWNER has provided ENGINEER in
writing. OWNER shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of
ENGINEER'S services.
8.8 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to
give any rights to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER.
8.9 CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of
conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this contract shall be venued in the Hennepin County
District Court.
Doc. #170480v.1
16
RNK: 5/23/2013
8.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
8.10.1. OWNER and ENGINEER each is hereby bound and the partners, successors,
executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and ENGINEER are hereby bound
to the other party, to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators and
legal representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements,
and obligations of this Agreement.
8.10.2. Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or
interest in (including, but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due)
this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment,
subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law.
Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment
will release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing
contained in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent
professional associates and consultants as ENGINEER may deem appropriate to assist in the
performance of services hereunder.
8.10.3. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in
this Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER, and all duties and responsibilities
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the OWNER and
ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party.
8.11 PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §471.25, Subd.
4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor's receipt of
payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor
must pay interest of 11/2 percent per month or any part of the month to the subcontractor on any
undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest
penalty payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of
less than $100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A
subcontractor who prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the contractor shall
be awarded its costs and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action.
8.12 COPYRIGHT/PATENT INFRINGEMENT. ENGINEER shall defend actions or claims
charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs,
Drawings or Specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the OWNER from loss or
damage resulting there from.
8.13 NOTICES. Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the
appropriate party at its address on the signature page and given personally, by facsimile, by
registered or certified mail postage prepaid, or by a commercial courier service. All notices shall be
effective upon the date of receipt.
8.14 SURVIVAL. All express representations, waivers, indemnifications, and limitations of
liability included in this Agreement will survive its completion or termination for any reason.
Doc. #170480v.1
17
RNK: 5/23/2013
8.15 SEVERABILITY. Any provision or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable
under any Laws or Regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall
continue to be valid and binding upon OWNER and ENGINEER, who agree that the Agreement
shall be reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable
provision that comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision.
8.16 WAIVER. A party's non-enforcement of any provision shall not constitute a waiver of that
provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this
Agreement.
9. PRIOR AGREEMENT
This Agreement supersedes all prior written and oral contracts and agreements except for the
following:
IN WITNESS VVHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.
OWNER: ENGINEER:
18
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
Its Mayor
AND
Its City Manager
ADDRESS FOR GIVING NOTICES:
Chad A. Millner, PE
Director of Engineering
City of Edina
7450 Metro Blvd
Edina, MN 55439
Doc. #170480v.1
RNK: 5/23/2013
SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
BY: W•%•t•w-o'-----
Its CFO
ADDRESS FOR GIVING NOTICES:
Contact: Matt Pacyna
Title: Senior Associate
SRF Consulting Group, Inc.
One Carlson Parkway N., Suite 150
Minneapolis, MN 55447
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.L.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Bill Neuendorf, Ec o nimic Development Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Trans fer P roperty at 4416 Valley View R oad to the
Edina Hous ing & R edevelo p ment Autho rity
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
M otion authorizing the transfer of the property located at 4416 Valley View R oad to the E dina H ousing and
R edevelopment Authority.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
T his property is currently owned by the City of E dina. To facilitate redevelopment of the parcel, staff
recommends that the title be transferred to the E dina H ousing and Redevelopment Authority. T his C ity-to-H R A
transfer will facilitate a future sale of the property.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.M.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:S c o tt H. Neal, C ity Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:R es olution No. 2017-67: Approving S p ecial Law Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Adopt resolution.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
T his relates special legislation that would allow E dina to create T I F D istricts throughout the S outheast E dina
R edevelopment P roject Area to further affordably priced housing in Edina. C ity approval of this Special Law is
required before it formally goes into effect.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Res olution No. 2017-67: Approving Special Law
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-67
RESOLUTION APPROVING A SPECIAL LAW AUTHORIZING
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS FOR HOUSING PURPOSES
AND EXPENDITURES FROM THE SOUTHDALE 2
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Article XII, Section 2 of the Minnesota Constitution and Minnesota Statutes
§645.021 authorize a local government unit to enact a special law affecting the local government unit
following approval by resolution adopted by a majority vote of all members of the governing body;
and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature approved a special law, Minn. Laws 2017 Special Session,
Chapter 1, Article 6, Section 11 providing that the City of Edina or its development authority may
establish one or more tax increment financing districts in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project
Area, as the boundaries exist on March 31, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the special law is effective upon approval of the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA,
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA (THE "CITY") AS FOLLOWS:
1. Minnesota Laws 2017 Special Session, Chapter 1, Article 6, Section 11 (the "Special Law"),
which authorizes the City to establish one or more new housing tax increment districts in the
current boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and authorizes
expenditures from the Southdale 2 tax increment financing district, subject to certain special
rules, is hereby approved.
2. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to file with the Secretary of State a certified copy of
this resolution and the appropriate certificate in the form prescribed by the State Attorney
General no later than December 31, 2017.
Dated this 20th day of June 2017
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 4, 2017, and as recorded
in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________.
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: V.N.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R eq uest F or P urc has e
F rom:Ann Kattreh, P arks & R ec reation Directo r
Item Activity:
Subject:R eques t fo r P urchas e: Authorize C ons ultant S ervices
for G oodpointe Tec hno lo gy
Action
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
R equesting approval for P avement Condition study in C ity P arks.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
S ee attached documents
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Goofpointe Technology Quote
Reques t for Purchas e: Goodpointe Technology
February 27, 2017
Ann Kattreh
Parks & Recreation Manager
City of Edina Parks & Recreation Department
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: RFP – PAVEMENT CONDITION SERVICES/REVISED QUOTE EXHIBIT A.2
Dear Ann:
We are pleased to present the following cost proposal to provide data collection
services to the City of Edina.
We understand that this project is very important to the City; the quality of your
decisions to allocate resources and maintain the short- and long-term health of your
network of infrastructure assets depends on the integrity of the technical models and
the quality of the process used to develop and deliver the results of this project.
To ensure that this critically important project is executed successfully, we have
assembled a team of internationally recognized infrastructure management experts,
engineering professionals, and field technicians to accomplish the required scope of
work. Over the past thirty years we have successfully implemented data collection
plans worldwide for clients just like The City of Edina.
We appreciate the opportunity to continue our work with you on this project, and we
look forward to providing high-quality data collection and professional engineering
consulting services to the City.
I am authorized to make representations and commitments on behalf of GoodPointe
Technology.
Sincerely,
GoodPointe Technology
Anthony J. Kadlec
President: Attachment: Cost Proposal Exhibit A.2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Description
Page
A
Project Outline
1
B
Firm and Contact Information
3
C
Past Project Experience and Reference List
6
D
Project Approach and Work Plan
13
E
Project Schedule
17
F
Fee Schedule
18
Appendix A.
Pavements to be Evaluated in this Project
19
Appendix B.
ICON Software Suite
21
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 1 of 21
A. PROJECT OUTLINE
WHY SELECT GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY FOR THIS PROJECT?
Simply put, the implementation of pavement and related infrastructure asset
management systems is what we do for a living, day in and day out. We take pride in
building and maintaining long-term client relationships and supporting our clients with
their use of our ICON asset management software and through the delivery of high-
quality right of way inventory and condition data.
Beyond collecting objective and repeatable data, our mission is to transform it into
actionable/decision-making information for your staff through the use of the ICON
asset management system to be implemented. To accomplish this, we will leverage
the vast expertise of our staff, who continually refines and improve in coordination with
our active asset management user group based here in the Twin Cities metropolitan
area.
(RE)INTRODUCING GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY
GoodPointe Technology (GoodPointe) is one of the leading infrastructure
management systems- engineering and software-consulting firms in North America.
The core mission of GoodPointe is to develop and provide high-quality roadway- and
related asset management software and system consulting services to clients in the
governmental and private sector.
We help the authorities of public and private infrastructure/facilities to more
effectively meet their management and maintenance needs by providing powerful,
flexible, and easy to use management system software and implementation services.
Our management system implementation services include:
Strategic capital improvement project planning and needs analysis for your
local conditions;
Data transfer and design of infrastructure condition data collection services;
Digital Right of Way imaging data collection and integration services;
Infrastructure system performance analysis;
Software Development and Implementation Services;
GIS Consulting, Crystal Reports Development, and System Training Services;
Generating budget investment and deferred maintenance analysis scenarios;
and,
The development of short-term and long-term infrastructure maintenance,
repair, and rehabilitation plans.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 2 of 21
OUR PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT
Our years of experience have taught us to maintain a flexible approach in the process
of working with clients in developing, implementing, and updating pavement and
related right of way infrastructure maintenance management systems. Each project
presents unique challenges that may depend on a combination of factors including:
socio-economic conditions, infrastructure network condition, available staff, resources
of the project sponsor, and organizational receptivity to the management system and
resulting plans produced.
Our plan for this project is to:
o Leverage our expert knowledge of the City’s ICON pavement
management system to establish functional class/management
level(s) in the City’s existing ICON pavement management system
to store the inventory and condition data collected in this project;
o Establish a link between the City’s parking lot and trail inventory
and City GIS so that the City can plot color coded maps of
pavement condition;
o Collect high quality ASTM PCI condition data through a manual
(walking) PCI survey; and,
o Deliver the summary results in an XLS report.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 3 of 21
B. FIRM AND CONTACT INFORMATION
GoodPointe Technology is a privately held, Minnesota-based corporation
Address:
GoodPointe Technology, Inc.
World Headquarters
287 E. 6th Street, Suite 200
St. Paul, MN 55101
This is the office location from where the work will be carried out on this project.
OUR PHILOSOPHY
We realize that understanding and effectively resolving today's increasingly complex
infrastructure problems requires an experienced, interdisciplinary team of
professionals. Pavement and related infrastructure management systems no longer
present single-issue solutions but interdependent ones that cross technical,
departmental, regulatory, and provincial boundaries. That is why we take an
integrated, interdisciplinary approach to help our clients meet these challenges.
We take great pride in delivering high-quality infrastructure management software
and system data to our clients, and we encourage you to contact our references to
verify our claim as you perform your due diligence in consideration of this project.
Since we work on "both sides of this equation", we realize it is not good enough to
implement our industry leading software (or any other third party software program)
with average quality data. Nor will it suffice to have the world’s best data reside within
a software program that is difficult to use, maintain, and cannot model the local
dynamics that challenge your infrastructure system.
OUR PEOPLE
Our personnel have been developing successful pavement management
consultation relationships with local, national, and international government agencies
since the 1980’s. Our team for this project includes staff whose work has advanced the
technology of infrastructure management science in North America and the rest of
the world. We believe our experience in the field of pavement management science,
management system implementations, and our experience in knowing how to work
well with governmental agencies across the world demonstrates our strong
commitment to serving clients like you.
OUR FIRM
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. (GoodPointe) appreciates this opportunity to serve The
City of Edina. GoodPointe offers the City with a wealth of experience that has already
served the needs of a variety of public organizations and private sector clients
throughout North America and in selected markets around the world, with a regional
Point of Contact:
Mr. Anthony Kadlec, President
Office Phone: (651) 726-2555
Office Fax: (651) 726-2545
Mobile: (651) 271-0422
Email: tkadlec@goodpointe.com
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 4 of 21
emphasis in the Midwest.
GoodPointe specializes in providing high-quality data collection,
data reduction, and implementation services for infrastructure
management software systems. Over the past twenty-five years
GoodPointe staff have also been involved in the development, redevelopment,
implementation and/or integration of infrastructure management systems such as
those developed by the San Francisco Bay Area MTC (BAMTCPMS™), Army Corps of
Engineers (MicroPAVER™), Carter System, Infrastructure Management Services, Inc.
(IMS), Midwest Pavement Management, lnc., (PMP), China PMS, Highway Sign
Inventory System, lnfracon (PMS/IMS™), and Stantec™, as well as ICON and a number
of other public agencies’ in-house infrastructure and pavement management
systems.
Our staff includes a talented group of GIS, GPS and digital mapping professionals who
design and build data collection vehicles, develop related software, and provide
data collection, GIS mapping, and asset inventory services to a wide variety of clients
in both the public and private sectors.
Our clients include cities, counties, state DOTs, telecommunication companies, utility
companies, and transportation agencies. We have contracted for more than 250,000
miles of GPSVision data collection, mapping, road geometry and asset inventory on
roads and rails in the U.S. and Canada since 1994.
GoodPointe Technology is headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, and employs
technical staff located regionally across North America, Europe, and Asia.
Role in this Project: GoodPointe will serve as the prime consultant for this project,
implementing our ICON asset management software and facilitating the required data
collection plan, collection, quality control, and data processing services.
OUR PROJECT MANAGER FOR YOUR PROJECT
Mr. Anthony (Tony) Kadlec has 27 years of experience in the civil engineering
profession, the last 24 of which have been focused on the implementation of
infrastructure management systems. He has been involved with the management and
the successful completion of more than 350 system implementations and infrastructure
improvement plans, in projects throughout all regions of the United States and in World
Bank projects located in Mainland China. His work involves working with clients to
determine system requirements, designing the data collection process, analyzing
system data, writing reports and presenting the results to the elected officials.
Mr. Kadlec has presented numerous papers at various national and international
conferences and is also a guest lecturer in the Infrastructure Systems Engineering (ISE)
graduate program at the University of Minnesota, Institute of Technology (IT).
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 5 of 21
THE ICON INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
GoodPointe is the developer and primary distributor of the
Infrastructure CONsultant (ICON) infrastructure
management software program, which is used throughout
all regions of North America and in selected markets
worldwide. We also distribute ICON through Value Added
Reseller (VAR) partner firms, which include: engineering and
environmental service companies, architectural firms, real
estate management firms, and similar organizations.
The ICON software suite enables our clients to more cost-effectively manage their
infrastructure assets; assets that range from county roads, to city streets, sidewalks,
curb and gutter, signs and signals, bridges, parking lots, wastewater and storm
drainage systems, water pipelines, park features, and other miscellaneous assets.
“What good is the information age if you
do not have the right information?
To advance in this technology-driven world
requires more than technical competency and
the will to succeed; it requires the right people
with the right technology, the right information
and the spirit of cooperation.
We believe that life is too short not to enjoy
what you're doing, especially when we
consider all the time that we spend at work,
trying to succeed and helping others succeed.
As the pace of information systems and
computer technology seems to quicken, we
will work with you to sort out what information
you need to manage, so that you can maintain
your perspective, establish your vision, and
achieve your goals.
Our mission is to: "Get to the point"; in other
words, let's work together to determine the
information that you need to succeed, then
we'll do our best to put you in the position to
collect, analyze, and use and maintain this
information.”
-From the GoodPointe Technology Corporate
Mission Statement
Our Infrastructure CONsultant (ICON)
program features powerful, flexible,
customized and easy to use
management technology, which has
been used over the last 30 years by
clients across the world, in supporting
their maintenance management of
pavements, bridges, and drainage
infrastructure assets. The ICON software
system is one of the most advanced
maintenance management tools on
the market today. Our numerous
clients around the world use ICON to
manage over $50 Billion USD worth of
infrastructure assets!
Our products and services are built
upon a strong foundation of
knowledge which spans several
decades of experience in helping
people effectively manage the
infrastructure assets entrusted to them.
We are experts in our niche in the
world of infrastructure management
systems technology and we are
passionate in our mission to help you
successfully manage your own corner
of the world.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 6 of 21
C. PAST PROJECT EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCE LIST
City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Mr. Doug Gregerson, Sr. Management Analyst, Public Works Administration 612.673.3170, doug.gregerson@minneapolismn.gov
In 2014 and previously in 2011, GoodPointe analyzed the entire roadway network of 1,338 centerline miles under the jurisdiction of the City of Minneapolis, transferring the multiple MicroPAVER PMS database files into one comprehensive and integrated management system and to work with City staff to establish a set of maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation strategies for modeling their PMS policy in the ICON system. Multi-year budget analysis scenarios were run and compiled to model the effects of: current funding levels, maintaining current condition, and to attain specified benchmark PCI goals for the various sub-networks of pavements.
City of St. Paul, Minnesota Mr. Dan Haak, Construction Supervisor (651) 266.6084, dan.haak@ci.stpaul.mn.us
In 2009/2010 GoodPointe facilitated an ASTM Pavement Condition Index (PCI) data survey of the entire network of 900 centerline miles of urban pavements for the City of St. Paul.
In 2014 the City incorporated the inventory and condition of its 150 mile alleyway network and the pathways/trails, and parking lots of the City Park System into GoodPointe’s ICON Pavement Management Software for tracking pavement condition and determining multi-year maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation options.
Hennepin County, Minnesota Ms. Jamie Hendrickson, Asset Management Coordinator, Hennepin County Public Works, Transportation Department/Operations (612) 596.0335, Jamie.hendrickson@hennepin.us
In 1995 GoodPointe implemented the ICON pavement management system for the network of 561 centerline miles of urban and rural roadway pavements.
In 2013/2014 GoodPointe implemented a comprehensive County-wide asset management program using the ICON system, for its network of: Asset Height (Restrictions), Catch Basins, Culverts, Curbs, Grit Chambers, Guardrails, Medians,
Pavement Markings, Pedestrian Ramps, Railroad Crossings, Retaining Walls, Signs, and Signals. The project involved developing customized functionality to
meet the County’s operational needs.
Washington County, Minnesota
Mr. Don Theisen, Transportation and Physical Development (TPD) Director, (651) 592.6900, Don.Theisen@co.washington.mn.us
GoodPointe collected additional digital imaging data for selected routes of the Washington County network of 281 centerline miles to update its ICON
pavement management/sign management system. GoodPointe had initially imaged the entire County network in 2004 and implemented the ICON
pavement management system in 1995. The County reports its annual PCI as a part of its balanced scorecard of County-wide performance measures.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 7 of 21
Columbus Consolidated Government, Columbus, Georgia Mr. Farhad (Ali) AliFarhani, P.E., Design Engineer (706) 225.3961, falifarhani@columbusga.org GoodPointe is presently working to collect and update the PCI pavement condition and related right of way data for the 1,000 centerline-mile urban pavement network managed by the Columbus Consolidated Government (CCG). GoodPointe had previously collected pavement condition and right of way asset management data (signs, curb/gutter, and sidewalk) data in 2008 and had initially implemented the ICON Pavement Management System for Columbus with a manual PCI survey in 2001 and provided system consulting services to develop a prioritized long-term maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation plan for the CCG. City of Eden Prairie, Minnesota Mr. Rod Rue, P.E., City Engineer (952) 949.8326, RRue@edenprairie.org In 2013, GoodPointe collected and updated the PCI pavement condition system data for the 221 centerline-mile urban pavement network managed by the City of Eden Prairie, which includes primarily bituminous pavements. Previously, GoodPointe rated the entire City network of 221 centerline miles in each of the years, 2010, 2007, 2004, 2001, 1998, and 1995. The City uses GoodPointe’s ICON Pavement Management Software to develop multi-year budget analysis plans and to track the condition of its City-wide trail network. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma Mr. Jim Hemphill, P.E., Poe & Associates (918) 665.8800, jhemphill@poetulsa.com Although the City had been an active user of MicroPAVER since 1987, it needed more analysis power to separately manage its arterial and residential pavement networks. In 1997 the City of Tulsa hired local engineering consultant (POE) to perform an independent research study on the field of PMS software to find a system that would improve their ability to perform comprehensive budget analysis scenarios and to develop multi-year work plans more effectively.
Of all the pavement management systems reviewed on the criteria/ weighting of: product support (15%), ease of use/documentation (10%), database compatibility with MicroPAVER (10%), network definition capability (20%), analysis capabilities (20%), reporting capabilities (15%), and customization capabilities (10%), our ICON program was selected as the City’s PMS tool of choice (over other third party systems, including Cartegraph). GoodPointe has converted the extensive MicroPAVER database into the ICON program and assists Poe with the development of the multi-year budget analysis scenarios on an annual basis.
The City currently uses the ICON Pavement Management System to manage its 2,000 centerline mile roadway network and has also collaborated with GoodPointe to develop the Emerge™ data collection application, which works on a Windows, Android, or IOS operating systems.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 8 of 21
Total
Centerline
Miles Agency Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
S
u
r
v
e
y
C
r
e
w
s
Ta
b
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
a
t
a
Qu
a
l
i
t
y
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Da
t
a
b
a
s
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Da
t
a
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Point of Contact Department
425 Anoka County, MN x X x x x Mr. Andy Witter Highway Department
422 Arlington County, VA x X x x x Mr. Hung Tran Public Works Department
366 Chisago County, MN X x x Mr. Joe Triplett Highway Department
28 City of Arden Hills, MN x X x x x Ms. Kristine Giga Engineering Department
399 City of Bloomington, MN x x x x x Mr. Charlie Wild Public Works Department
211 City of Burnsville, MN x x x x x Mr. Jeff Radick Engineering Department
101 City of Champlin, MN x x x x x Mr. Tim Hanson Engineering Department
170 City of Cottage Grove, MN x x x x x Ms. Jennifer Levitt Public Works Department
516 City of Dothan, MN x x x x x Mr. Charles Metzger Engineering Department
444 City of Duluth, MN x x x x x Ms. Cari Pedersen Engineering Department
228 City of Eagan, MN x x x x Ms. Sara Pluta Public Works - Streets Department
224 City of Eden Prairie, MN x x x x x Mr. Rod Rue Engineering Department
193 City of Eden Prairie Parks, MN x x x x x Mr. Stu Fox Parks and Recreation
200 City of Edina, MN x x x x x Mr. Patrick Wrase Engineering Department
146 City of Elk River, MN x x x Mr. John Anderson Public Works/Engineering
14 City of Falcon Heights, MN x x x x x Ms. Kristine Giga Engineering Department
452 City of Fargo, ND x x x x x Mr. Cody Eliertson Engineering Department
111 City of Fergus Falls, MN x x x x x Mr. Brian Yavarow Engineering Department
98 City of Hastings, MN x x x x x Mr. John Caven Engineering Department
57 City of Hopkins, MN x x x x x Mr. Rich Hill Engineering Department
76 City of Hutchinson, MN x x x x x Mr. John Olson Public Works Department
151 City of Inver Grove Heights, MN x x x x x Mr. Scott Thureen Engineering Department
132 City of Maplewood, MN x x x x Mr. Michael Thompson Public Works Department
1,400 City of Minneapolis, MN x x x Mr. Doug Gregerson Public Works Administration
210 City of Moorhead, MN x x x x x Mr. Jim Schulz Engineering Department
39 City of Mounds View, MN x x Mr. Jim Hess Department of Public Works
150 City of Murrieta, CA x x x x x Mr. Yaz Emrani HFINC Project Manager
63 City of New Hope, MN x x x x x Mr. Bob Paschke Public Works Department
320 City of Newark, NJ x x x Mr. Jason Hahn Michael Baker Jr.
224 City of Norfolk, NE x x x x x Mr. Dale Bohac Engineering Department
46 City of North St Paul, MN x x x x x Ms. Bette Malm Community Services Department
100 City of Northfield, MN x x x x x Ms. Katy Gehler-Hess Public Works Department
13 City of Osseo, MN x x x x x Mr. Marcus Thomas Engineering Department
286 City of Plymouth, MN x x Mr. Jim Renneberg Engineering Department
131 City of Richfield, MN x x x Mr. Derick Anderson Department of Public Works
53 City of Robbinsdale, MN x x x x x Mr. Richard McCoy Public Works Department
422 City of Rochester, MN x x x x x Mr. Russ Kelm Department of Public Works
120 City of Roseville, MN x x x x x Mr. Pat Dolan Department of Public Works
108 City of Savage, MN x x x x x Mr. John Powell Engineering Department
27 City of Savage, MN Parks & Rec x x x x x Mr. John Powell Engineering Department
91 City of Shoreview, MN x x x x x Mr. Tom Wesolowski Department of Public Works
140 City of St. Louis Park, MN x x x x x Mr. Scott Merkley Public Works Department
900 City of St. Paul, MN, Public Works Department x x x Mr. Dan Haak Public Works Department
200 City of St. Paul, MN – Parks & Rec Department x x x x x Mr. Gary Korum Parks & Rec Department
71 City of West St. Paul, MN x x x x x Mr. Matt Saam Engineering Department
243 City of Woodbury, MN x x x x x Mr. Tony Kutzke Public Works Department
201 Becker County, MN x x x Mr. James Olson Highway Department
401 Beltrami County, MN x x x Mr. Bruce Hasbargen Highway Department
745 Clay County, MN x x x Mr. Nathan Gannon Highway Department
951 Columbus Consolidated Government, GA x x x x x Mr. Farhad AliFarhani Department of Engineering
300 Cook County, MN x x x Mr. Dave Betts Highway Department
603 Crow Wing County, MN x x x Mr. Steve Stroschein Highway Department
428 Dakota County, MN x x x Ms. Jodi Ulrich Highway Department
331 Dodge County, MN x x x Ms. Jessica Brennan Highway Department
412 Fillmore County, MN x x x Mr. John Grindeland Highway Department
623 Freeborn County, MN x x x Mr. Dan Kenison Highway Department
401 Goodhue County, MN x x x Mr. Greg Isakson Highway Department
321 Grand Forks East Grand Forks MPO, ND x x x x x Ms. Teri Kouba Planning Department
561 Hennepin County, MN x x x Ms. Jamie Hendrickson Transportation Division
420 Kanabec County, MN x x x Mr. Greg Nikodym Public Works
399 McLeod County, MN x x x x x Mr. John Brunkhorst Highway Department
402 Mille Lacs County, MN x x x Mr. Bruce Cochran Highway Department
1200 Monterrey County, CA x x x x x Mr. Javad Tanbakuchi AAE Project Manager
2226 Montgomery County, TX x x x Ms. Rhonda Hovater Communication Information Services
381 Olmsted County, MN x x x Mr. Zach Demmer Department of Public Works
1058 Ottertail County, MN x x x Mr. Chuck Grotte Highway Department
1469 City of Tulsa, OK x x x Mr. Jim Hemphill Poe & Associates, Inc.
531 City of Tulsa, OK x x x Mr. Jim Hemphill Poe & Associates, Inc.
967 Polk County, MN x x x Mr. Rich Sanders Highway Department
450 Rice County, MN x x x Mr. Jim Kollar Highway Department
2650 San Bernardino County, CA x x x Mr. Medhat Matta Pavement Mgmt. Department
GoodPointe Infrastructure Management System Data Collection/Integration Experience
In the last five years, GoodPointe has served as the preferred pavement
management/data collection consultant for the following agencies:
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 9 of 21
340 Scott County, MN x x x Ms. Jeannie Briol Highway Department
274 Wadena County, MN x x x Mr. Jeff Adolphson Highway Department
281 Washington County, MN x x x x x Mr. Don Theisen Transportation Department
380 Winona County, MN x x x Mr. Dave Kramer Highway Department
516 Wright County, MN x x x Mr. Kevin Johnson Highway Department
30,743 Total in last 5 Years
Past Infrastructure Management Projects Done by GoodPointe Staff
Anoka County, MN City of Ottumwa, IA Hidalgo County MPO
Arlington County, VA City of Plymouth, MN o City of Alamo, TX
Becker County, MN City of Richfield, MN o City of Edinburg, TX
Beltrami County, MN City of Robbinsdale, MN o City of McAllen, TX
Cook County, MN City of Rochester, MN o City of Mercedes, TX
Carlton County, MN City of Rosemount, MN o City of Pharr, TX
Chisago County, MN City of Roseville, MN o City of San Juan, TX
City of Arden Hills, MN City of San Antonio, TX o City of Weslaco, TX
City of Bloomington, MN City of San Francisco, CA Hunter Army Air Field
City of Brooklyn Center, MN City of Sausalito, CA Kanabec County, MN
City of Brooklyn Park, MN City of Shawnee, OK Marine Corps Recruit Depot, SC
City of Burnsville, MN City of Richfield, MN McClellan Air Force Base, CA
City of Cedar Falls, IA City of Robbinsdale, MN McLeod County, MN
City of Champlin, MN City of Shijiazhuang, PRC Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC)
City of Chanhassen, MN City of Shoreview, MN Metropolitan Council
City of Coon Rapids, MN City of South Pasadena, CA Mille Lacs County, MN
City of Cottage Grove, MN City of St. Paul, MN Minneapolis Park and Rec Board, MN
City of Denver, CO City of Tallahassee, FL Monterrey County, CA
City of Donna, TX City of Tulsa, OK Montgomery County, TX
City of Dothan, AL City of West Des Moines, IA Naval Air Station, Cecil Field, FL
City of Duluth, MN City of West St. Paul, MN Naval Air Station, Engelside, TX
City of Eagan, MN City of Woodbury, MN Olmsted County, MN
City of Eden Prairie, MN Clay County, MN Ohio Dept. of Transportation (ODOT)
City of Edina, MN Coco Solo Hospital, Panama Peterson Air Force Base, CO
City of Elk Grove, IL Columbus Consolidated Gov., GA San Bernardino County, CA
City of Evanston, IL Crow Wing County, MN Polk County, MN
City of Fargo, ND Dakota County, MN Scott County, MN
City of Fort Wayne, IN Dodge County, MN Sherburne County, MN
City of Grand Rapids, MN El Paso County, Texas Stanford University, CA
City of Guangzhou, PRC Fairfax County, VA Steele County, MN
City of Hopkins, MN Fillmore County, MN Tulsa District Corps of Eng., OK
City of Hutchinson, MN Fort Buchanan, San Juan, Puerto Rico University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
City of International Falls, MN Fort Clayton, Republic of Panama Virginia Dept. of Transp. (VDOT)
City of Inver Grove Heights, MN Fort Devens, Ayer, MA USMCA, Baumholder, Germany
City of Lakeville, MN Fort Drum, Watertown, NY USMCA, Fulda, Germany
City of Maplewood, MN Fort Gillem, Georgia USMCA, Geoppingen, Germany
City of Menlo Park, CA Fort McCoy, Sparta, WI USMCA, Hanau, Germany
City of Miami/Dade County, FL Fort McPherson, GA Ventura County, CA
City of Minneapolis Fort Meade. Baltimore MD Village of Highland Park, IL
City of Monticello, MN Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX Village of Inverness, IL
City of Moorhead, MN Fort Stewart, GA Village of St. Anthony, MN
City of Mounds View, MN Fort Story, Virginia Beach, VA Wadena County, MN
City of Murrieta, CA Freeborn County, MN Washington County, MN
City of New Hope, MN Goodhue County, MN Winona County, MN
City of Newark, NJ George Air Force Base, CA
City of Norfolk, NE Grand Forks-East Grand Forks MPO
City of North St. Paul, MN o City of Grand Forks, ND
City of Oakdale, MN o City of Grand Forks, ND
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 10 of 21
CLIENT TESTIMONIAL LETTERS
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 11 of 21
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 12 of 21
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 13 of 21
D. PROJECT APPROACH AND WORK PLAN
TASK 1. PROJECT INITIATION
Once the notice of selection has been received, the first step in this project will be to
have a project kickoff/needs analysis meeting to establish and document the specific
scope of work to be performed based on the project specifications and any options
selected. In this meeting current infrastructure management operations will be
reviewed to identify the data-related requirements for this asset management system
implementation project.
The needs assessment will include, but not be limited to:
o Consideration of the effects of climatic conditions, site conditions, drainage,
and other environmental factors affecting the network performance of
selected assets in the City network.
o Definition of the desired objectives of the asset management program;
o Discussion of the types of information available from any legacy asset data;
o A general history of the City’s asset management practices, and,
o City’s resource needs for successful short- and long-term maintenance of
the data.
TASK 2. PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEY
Perform a pavement surface condition evaluation that identifies pavement distress
type, quantity, severity, and extent expressed as a percent to produce a calculated
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for each inventory section evaluated in this project.
General Survey Methodology
The PCI is a numerical expression of a pavement condition rating system which was
initially developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The PCI methodology is used
nationwide and is endorsed by the American Public Works Association (APWA), the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the U.S. Military, and has been standardized by
the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM).
The surface condition assessment for this project will contain standard survey condition
methodology as defined in the ASTM 6433-11, by the American Society for Testing and
Materials. The assessment will provide the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for the
pavement features evaluated in this project (roadways, parking lots, and paved trails)
GoodPointe Technology uses the PCI methodology as the basis for the majority of our
pavement management system implementations because it provides a reliable and
repeatable methodology, which follows nationally established definitions, procedures,
and provides the greatest utility for pavement rehabilitation analysis.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 14 of 21
GoodPointe Technology will use the most current set of available data from City
sources to perform the field survey of physical pavement features.
If the City has historical records of construction/maintenance projects that have most
recently been performed on the roadway sections in this project, GoodPointe requests
that the City clearly indicate the latest construction/maintenance project (type of
maintenance and date of project) data that is available for each inventory section to
be evaluated in the project.
During the course of the pavement condition survey GoodPointe Technology will
validate the project information as it relates to the current pavement condition
observed in the field. Any incorrect and/or missing data will be noted and entered
into the City’s ICON system for future action.
The condition survey data will be recorded based upon actual surface conditions and
physical characteristics of the pavement section observed in the field. The proposed
survey is a walking survey which will cover the surface of each pavement section using
the PCI survey procedure in conjunction with the sampling procedures selected by
the City for this project.
Data entry will be performed concurrently with the pavement surface condition data
collection process using our Emerge! mobile data collection application, which will
transfer the data directly into the City’s ICON pavement management system.
Sampling Procedures for This Project
The pavement sampling procedures will generally follow the standard PCI sampling
guidelines outlined in ASTM PCI Standard D6433-11:
Given Evaluate
1 to 5 Sample Units 1 Sample Unit
6 to 10 Sample Units 2 Sample Units
11 to 15 Sample Units 3 Sample Units
16 to 40 Sample Units 4 Sample Units
Over 40 Sample Units 10% of the Sample Units
Where a pavement sample unit is defined as 2,500 square feet +/- 1,000 square feet.
To remain consistent with past PCI surveys that we have done for the City, a minimum
sampling rate of 20% of the pavement surface area will be utilized for this project.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 15 of 21
For the bituminous pavements within the selected project area, the following
pavement surface condition distresses will be utilized for evaluation:
Bleeding & Pumping Patching
Block Cracking Polished Aggregate
Bumps & Sags Potholes
Corrugations
(shoving/washboard)
Railroad Crossing
Depression Raveling & Weathering
Edge Cracking Rutting
Fatigue (Alligator) Cracking Slippage Cracking
Lane/Shoulder Drop-off Swell
If any Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements are located within the
selected project area, the following pavement surface distresses will be
utilized for evaluation:
Corner Breaks Durability(“D”) Cracking Divided Slabs
Joint Seal Damage Faulting Patching
Polished Aggregate Punchout Shrinkage Cracks
Scaling/Map Cracking Spalling, Corner Spalling, Joint
Longitudinal/Transverse
Cracking
Other distresses
as specified
NOTE: The survey will identify the following distress information: type; quantity
(expressed in an appropriate measure); severity, and extent (expressed as a percent).
TASK 3. ICON PREMIUM CONSULTING PACKAGE
GoodPointe recommends a twenty (20) hour ICON Premium Consulting Package to
cover the basic inventory setup of the pavement inventory to be evaluated in this
project.
Assist the City with the establishment of the City inventory database for the
pavements to be evaluated in this project;
Transfer and/or update the pre-existing geocode link/asset data from the City’s
legacy database system(s).
Provide onsite or online ICON system training for City staff designated to work
with the system.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 16 of 21
Data entry of the paving projects performed in recent years, registering the
improved pavement condition into the ICON database.
Receive and enter the City's Proposed Paving Projects (CIP List) and proposed
project costs into the Predetermined Plan of ICON.
Update the ICON program to reflect the City's current asset management
policies, paving strategies, application parameters, unit costs, etc.
Review/Update the pavement performance curves to be loaded in ICON
based on actual City pavement performance data.
Use the ICON Budget Analysis Module to run multiple, multi-year projections (1
to 75 years into the future) to document the projected average network
condition and deferred maintenance backlog results, based on the data
supplied in above items.
Document the Trends in Pavement Condition, queried out of the historical
database tables of ICON.
Include the scenario results run in an executive summary report.
Generate GIS mapping data and/or PowerPoint presentation materials for
elected officials.
Note:
The above items are offered as a preliminary suggestion of work objectives for the City
under this project. GoodPointe will work with the City to define/refine the set of
deliverables under this task. GoodPointe will provide an ongoing report of the
consulting effort provided under this task throughout the duration of the project.
Out of pocket expenses (e.g. billable project mileage ($0.75/mile) for non-survey-
related work will be billed separately.
TASK 4. ICON MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OPTION
Under this OPTIONAL task, GoodPointe would set up a dedicated ICON infrastructure
management system (Pavement Module) for use by specified users of the City Parks &
Recreation Department, for maintaining the inventory, condition, and maintenance
data of the assets that are evaluated in this project.
The establishment of this system (which would be separate from the ICON program run
by the City Engineering department for managing the City roadway network) would
enable the Parks Department to actively track the ongoing condition of these assets
and to run multi-year budget analysis scenarios to recommend maintenance, repair,
and rehabilitation projects and the required levels of funding to maintain a specified
level of service based on the conditions, unit costs,
Since the City of Edina is already an ICON License holder of the Pavement module,
there would be NO additional software license to purchase, however an annual extra
database fee would apply. For the annual fee, GoodPointe would provide unlimited
system support to one specified user in the Parks Department and provide all software
updates for the annual support period.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. February 27, 2017
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 17 of 21
The proposed ICON system is a browser-based, multi-user, GIS-integrated, relational
database management system (RDBMS) application, which would be hosted by
GoodPointe on our dedicated Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud server.
For more information about the ICON software suite, please refer to Appendix B of this
proposal.
E. PROJECT SCHEDULE
Here is our proposed preliminary schedule for this project:
Project Kickoff meeting: (Based upon Notice to Proceed Date)
Field Data Collection: Spring/Summer 2017
Project Completion: On or before November 30, 2017
The above data is offered as a preliminary schedule suggestion for the City’s
consideration and can be adjusted to better meet the City’s schedule
requirements.
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. July 5, 2015
City of Edina, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 18 of 21
F. FEE SCHEDULE
This cost estimate is based upon the GIS source data as provided by the City on 6/22/2016. The final invoice totals will be based
upon the actual field inventory totals evaluated and confirmed in this project.
APPENDIX A. Pavements to be Evaluated in this Project
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 19 of 21
APPENDIX A. PAVEMENTS TO BE EVALUATED IN THIS PROJECT
Summary of paved Parking Lots to be evaluated in this project:
Park Number of Lots Total PCI Samples Samples to Evaluate
Alden Park 1 3 1
Arneson Acres Park 1 15 3
Braemar Park 6 329 36
Bredesen Park 3 19 5
Chowen Park 1 1 1
Cornelia School Park 4 44 8
Countryside Park 1 16 4
Creek Valley 1 9 2
Creek Valley School Park 1 6 2
Garden Park 1 27 4
Highlands Park 2 18 5
Lake Cornelia Park 2 42 7
Normandale Park 1 5 1
Pamela Park 4 47 10
Strachauer Park 1 3 1
Todd Park 1 3 1
Utley Park 1 7 2
Van Valkenburg Park 1 34 4
W W Lewis Park 2 21 5
Walnut Ridge Park 1 3 1
Weber Park 2 11 3
Wooddale Park 1 5 1
Yorktown Park 1 8 2
Grand Total 40 676 109
Source: City GIS shapefile data dated 6/22/2016.
APPENDIX A. Pavements to be Evaluated in this Project
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 20 of 21
Summary of paved Trails to be evaluated in this project:
Park Number of Trails Trail Miles
Alden Park 1 0.22
Arden Park 1 0.37
Arneson Acres Park 4 0.21
Braemar Park 3 1.14
Bredesen Park 6 8.55
Centennial Lakes Park 3 1.46
Chowen Park 1 0.45
Countryside Park 1 0.61
Fox Meadow 3 0.45
Garden Park 2 1.45
Heights Park 2 0.51
Highlands Park 1 0.08
Kojetin Park 1 0.09
Lake Cornelia Park 3 2.40
Lake Edina Park 1 0.28
McGuire Park 1 0.02
Todd Park 2 0.80
Utley Park 1 0.20
W W Lewis Park 1 1.52
Walnut Ridge Park 1 1.19
Wooddale Park 1 0.38
York Park 1 0.04
Yorktown Park 3 0.65
Grand Total 44 23.06
Source: City GIS shapefile data dated 6/22/2016.
Basketball Courts: 13 total
Tennis Courts: 9 total
Source: Shapefile from consultant study conducted a few years prior to
proposal date.
APPENDIX B. ICON Software Suite (Provided as Separate Attachment)
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 21 of 21
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Date:
June 20,2017
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director
Subject:
Purchase
Subject to:
☐List Quote/Bid
☐State Contract
☒Service Contract
The
Recommended
Bid is:
☐Within Budget
☒Not Within Budget
The City has 40 parking lot surfaces, 44 trails totaling 23.06 miles, 13 basketball courts and 9
tennis/pickleball courts. It is important for us to evaluate and collect this data and evaluation of our
inventory so that we can continue to provide a high level of service for those who utilize our
amenities.
We currently do similar evaluations on our city owned streets using Goodpointe Technology, and
their service has been exceptional. City Staff recommends this purchase.
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
February 17,2017 June 20, 2017
Company: Amount of Quote or Bid:
Goodpointe Technology $22,410.00
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Page 2
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________
City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Budget Impact
The Budget source for this is Parks paths and hard surfaces budget.
This is a new service for the Parks but this company is currently used for the engineering
department.
Environmental Impact
This purchase has no environmental impact upon the City.
Community Impact
This service will help promote a long term commitment to provide safe reliable and ADA
compliant access for all to and within our City park system.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Kyle S awyer, Assistant F inanc e Direc to r
Item Activity:
Subject:Ac c ept C omprehensive Annual F inanc ial R eport
(C AF R ) F o r Year End ed Dec ember 31, 2016
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Adopt a motion accepting the 2016 Comprehensive Annual F inancial R eport (C AF R ). J ames E ichten, C PA,
from M alloy, M ontague, K arnowski, Radosevich, & C o., P.A., (M M K R) the P rinciple in charge of the audit,
will be present at the meeting to do a presentation on the audit results.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
M M K R audited the financial statements of the C ity and issued an unqualified opinion, meaning in their judgment
the City's financial records and statements are fairly presented, and in accordance with G enerally Accepted
Accounting P rinciples (G AAP ). T here are also no findings or recommendations made by M M K R for the 2016
C AF R.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
2016 CAFR
Management Report
Special Purpos e Audit Report
PowerPoint: City of Edina Report
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
City of Edina, Minnesota
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016
Prepared by:
Department of Finance
Kyle Sawyer – Interim Finance Director
Sharae Sledge – Accountant
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Letter of Transmittal 1
GFOA Certificate of Achievement 4
Organization 5
Organization Chart 6
II. FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditors' Report 7
Management's Discussion and Analysis 11
Basic Financial Statements:
Government-wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position 23
Statement of Activities 24
Fund Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 26
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement
of Net Position 27
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Governmental Funds 28
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 29
Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds 30
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position -
Proprietary Funds 31
Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 32
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Agency Funds 34
Notes to Financial Statements 35
Required Supplementary Information:
Budgetary Comparison Information:
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund 73
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) 76
Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan Schedule of Funding Progress 77
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans GERF/PEPFF Retirement Funds
GERF Schedule of City's and Non-Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
& Schedule of City Contributions 78
PEPFF Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
& Schedule of City Contributions 79
Notes to Required Supplementary Information 80
Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules:
Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds 84
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds 85
Special Revenue Fund - Community Development Block Grant
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 86
Special Revenue Fund - Police Special Revenue
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 87
Special Revenue Fund - Braemar Memorial
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 88
Special Revenue Fund - Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 89
Special Revenue Fund - Arts and Culture
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 90
Special Revenue Fund - Conservation and Sustainability
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 91
Capital Projects Fund - Environmental Efficiency
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 92
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Governmental Fund - Debt Service
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 94
Governmental Fund - Construction
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 95
Combining Statement of Net Position - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 98
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in
Fund Net Position - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 99
Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 100
Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Funds 103
Supplementary Financial Information:
Tax Capacity, Tax Levies and Tax Capacity Rates 105
Combined Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness 106
Schedule of Balance Sheet Accounts - Tax Increment Financing Districts 108
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Tax Increment Financing Districts 109
III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED)
Financial Trends:
Net Position by Component 112
Changes in Net Position 114
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 116
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 118
Revenue Capacity:
Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property 120
Direct and Overlapping Tax Capacity Rates 121
Principal Property Tax Payers 122
Property Tax Levies and Collections 123
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Debt Capacity:
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 124
Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 125
Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 126
Legal Debt Margin Information 127
Pledged Revenue Coverage 128
Demographic and Economic Information:
Demographic and Economic Statistics 129
Principal Employers 130
Operating Information:
Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 131
Operating Indicators by Function 132
Capital Asset Statistics by Function 133
1
June 13, 2017
To the Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Citizens of the City of Edina (City):
Minnesota statutes require that every city publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a
complete set of audited financial statements. This report is published to fulfill that requirement for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of the information
presented in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has
established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated
benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial
statements are free from material misstatement.
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co. P.A., a firm of licensed certified public accountants,
has issued an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the City’s financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2016. The independent auditor’s report is located at the front of the financial section of
this report.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor’s report
and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. The
MD&A complements this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it.
Profile of the City
The City, incorporated in 1888, is a fully developed first-ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City currently
occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of 50,766. Currently, 98% of the City
is developed with 55.5% of the land attributed to residential uses, 13.1% to roadways and 11.8%
supporting the park and open spaces. The remainder of the land is used for commercial, industrial and
public/semi-public uses. The City is empowered to levy a property tax on both real and personal
property located within its boundaries.
The City has operated under the Council-Manager form of government since 1955. Policy-making and
legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor and four other
members, all elected on a non-partisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for
passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees, and hiring the City Manager. The City
Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Council, for overseeing the
day-to-day operations of the city government, and for appointing the heads of the various departments.
Council members serve four-year terms, with two Council members elected every two years. The Mayor
also serves a four-year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large.
The City provides a full range of services, including police and fire protection; the construction and
maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure; water and sewer services and recreational
and cultural activities and events.
The Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the fiscal year. The annual
budget serves as the foundation for the City’s financial planning and control. The budget is prepared
by fund, function (e.g. public safety), and department (e.g. police). Department heads may use
resources within a department as they see fit. The City Manager may authorize transfers of budgeted
amounts between departments.
2
Local economy
The City currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and local indicators point to continued
stability. The region, while noted for a strong retail sector, enjoyed considerable re-development in
recent years. The re-development consisted of varied manufacturing, medical and high-tech base that
adds to the relative stability of the unemployment rate. Major industries with headquarters or divisions
within the government’s boundaries or in close proximity include medical services, retail operations and
banking services. Edina is home to over 50,000 jobs that are expected to remain stable over the coming
years.
The City has become known for its quality residential housing stock and attractive neighborhoods. To
date, approximately 98% of the available housing stock is in place. Although the emphasis has changed
over the years from exclusively single family housing to a more balanced mix of housing types, the
City’s concern for overall quality in residential development remains a top priority.
The City enjoys a AAA bond rating and a Aaa bond rating from Standard and Poors and Moody’s,
respectively.
Long-term financial planning
The Metropolitan Council requires all cities in the seven-county metropolitan area to have a
Comprehensive Plan and State law requires cities to update their plans every 10 years. The
Comprehensive Plan guides development and redevelopment and addresses changes likely to occur
due to various social and market forces. The City updated our Comprehensive Plan and submitted it to
the Metropolitan Council for review in 2008. A final version was adopted by the City Council in 2009.
The City continues to focus on quality of life improvements throughout Edina. These efforts cover a
broad array of areas including protecting and improving the environment, revitalization of parks and
public areas, expanding recreational opportunities, expanding City services, and increasing
communication between City representatives and the public.
The City is working closely with state government, federal government and neighboring communities
to improve the area’s state and county transportation network, which includes upgraded highways and
well-placed pathways. Funding for most of the transportation improvements will need to come from
state, county and federal sources, with some minor portion supported by the local taxpayers.
Relevant financial policies
The City has adopted a set of financial management policies that focus on long-term financial planning.
Policies cover areas such as cash and investments, the operating budget, revenue, fund balance,
capital outlay, and debt management.
Assignments for investments and compensated absences are all calculated as specified in the policies.
In addition, the City has $14,624,755 unassigned fund balance in the general fund. This amount is
$2,000,405 above the goal range identified in the policy.
Major initiatives
The City is continually working to update our aging infrastructure. Our annually adopted five-year
Capital Improvement Plan includes spending and financing projections for these projects.
3
Awards and Acknowledgements
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Edina for its
comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. This was the
eighth consecutive year that the government has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be
awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently
organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted
accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current
comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s
requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the
Finance Department staff. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the department
who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor
and the City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism
in the management of the City’s finances.
Respectfully submitted,
Kyle Sawyer
Interim Finance Director
GDI
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Edina
Minnesota
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2015
Executive Director/CEO
4
5
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
ORGANIZATION
December 31, 2016
Term Expires
Mayor:
James Hovland December 31, 2016
Council Members:
Mary Brindle December 31, 2016
Ann Swenson December 31, 2016
Kevin Staunton December 31, 2018
Bob Stewart December 31, 2018
City Manager:
Scott Neal Appointed
Finance Director/Treasurer:
Eric Roggeman Appointed
City Clerk:
Debra Mangen Appointed
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Residents
City Council
City Manager
Assistant City
Manager
Administration
City Clerk
Liquor Store
Operations
Economic
Development/HRA
Conservation and
Sustainability
Communications
& Technology
Information
Technology
Human Resources Finance
Police
Patrol
Investigations
Administrative
Services
Community Health
Fire
Fire & Rescue
Building
Inspections
Public Works
Streets
Maintenance
Utility Operations
Equipment
Operations
Facilities
Management
Parks
Maintenance
Engineering
Design &
Construction
Management
Environmental
Services
Transportation
Systems
Parks &
Recreation
Administration &
Recreation
Enterprise
Facilities
Community
Development
Planning
Assessing
6
7
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type
activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial
statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of
contents.
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes
the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITY
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted
our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and
the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error.
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City’s preparation
and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s
internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our audit opinions.
(continued)
8
OPINIONS
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to on the previous page present fairly, in all material
respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2016, and the
respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof, for the year then
ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
OTHER MATTERS
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s
discussion and analysis and the required supplementary information (RSI), as listed in the table of
contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part
of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who
considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an
appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to
the RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which
consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the
information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements,
and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an
opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us
with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively
comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual fund
financial statements and schedules, supplementary financial information, and statistical section, as listed
in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required parts of the
basic financial statements.
The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of
management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records
used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures,
including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other
records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and
other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
The introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section have not been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and,
accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them.
(continued)
9
OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 13, 2017
on our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its
compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters.
The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial
reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on internal control
over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in
accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control over financial
reporting and compliance.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 13, 2017
10
This page left blank intentionally.
11
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
As management of the City of Edina (the City), we offer readers of the City’s financial statements this
narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2016. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with
additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which precedes this report.
Financial Highlights
The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $239,550,955 (net position). Of
this amount, $39,447,040 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the City’s ongoing
obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the City's fund designations and fiscal
policies.
The City’s total net position increased by $14,234,473 from current year operations. $5,268,519 of
the operations increase is due to licenses and permits revenues from continued residential and
commercial redevelopment of the City. Also, $3,181,939 of the increase is due to Utility revenues
over expenses, which are being reinvested in new or rebuilt infrastructure according to the City’s
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and Utility Rate Study.
As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending
fund balances of $54,181,877, an increase of $9,642,149 in comparison with the prior year. The
increase can be attributed to the general obligation bond, series 2016A that was issued in 2016 in
the amount of $16,350,000 with a portion of the proceeds used to refund $3,785,000 of
governmental fund bonds in early 2017.
At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the general fund was $14,624,755
or 41% of total general fund expenditures.
The City’s total bonded debt increased by $5,803,625 during the current fiscal year, from
$111,089,595 to $116,893,220. The City issued new debt during the year consisting of $12,715,000
general obligation bonds to finance various street and utility infrastructure improvement projects,
and $3,635,000 general obligation bonds to refund old debt.
Overview of the Financial Statements
This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial
statements. The City’s basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-wide
financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report
also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves.
Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements are designed to
provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector
business.
The statement of net position presents information on all of the City’s assets, deferred outflows of
resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between them reported as
net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of
whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
12
The statement of activities presents information showing how the City’s net position changed during
the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event
giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and
expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal
periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave).
Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally
supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that
are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges
(business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public
safety, public works and parks. The business-type activities of the City include utilities, liquor, aquatic
center, golf course, arena, and community activity centers.
Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control
over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state
and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-
related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories:
governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds.
Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same
functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial
statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on
balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may
be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financial requirements.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide
financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds
with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial
statement. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City's near
term financial decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund
statement of revenues, expenditures, and change in fund balances provide a reconciliation to
facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities.
The City maintains four individual major governmental funds. Information is presented
separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of
revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund, Housing and
Redevelopment Authority fund, debt service fund and the construction fund.
Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
Individual fund data for each of these non-major governmental funds are provided in the form
of combining statements elsewhere in this report.
The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for all governmental and proprietary funds. A
budgetary comparison statement has been provided for all governmental funds to demonstrate
compliance with these budgets.
Proprietary funds. The City maintains five major enterprise funds and one internal service
fund. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type
activities in the governmental-wide financial statements. The City’s major enterprise funds are
used to account for its utility, liquor, aquatic center, golf course and arena operations.
Data from the other proprietary funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
Individual fund data for each of these non-major proprietary funds are provided in the form of
combining statements elsewhere in this report.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
13
Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial
statements, only in more detail.
Internal service funds. Internal service funds are used as an accounting device to accumulate
and allocate costs internally among the City’s various functions. The City uses its internal
service fund to account for risk management activities, including worker’s compensation,
volunteer accident, and property/casualty insurance. Because the internal service activities
predominantly benefit government rather than business-type functions, these services have
been included within governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of
parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide
financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the
City’s own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for
proprietary funds.
Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full
understanding of the data provided in the government–wide and fund financial statements.
Other information. The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non-major
governmental and enterprise funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary
information.
Government-wide Financial Analysis
As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial
position. In the case of the City, assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities and
deferred inflows of resources by $239,550,955 at the close of the most recent fiscal year.
The largest portion of the City's net position ($178,406,842 or 74%) reflects its investment in capital
assets (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related debt used to acquire those
assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens;
consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its
capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this
debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to
liquidate these liabilities.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
14
City of Edina’s Net Position
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Assets:
Current and
other assets 81,778,994$ 68,610,375$ 26,967,470$ 25,007,055$ 108,746,464$ 93,617,430$
Capital assets 164,999,307 158,595,429 128,110,759 123,960,540 293,110,066 282,555,969
Total assets 246,778,301$ 227,205,804$ 155,078,229$ 148,967,595$ 401,856,530$ 376,173,399$
Deferred outflows of resources:
Pension plan deferments 29,550,556$ 3,643,551$ 2,612,692$ 571,368$ 32,163,248$ 4,214,919$
Liabilities:
Long-term liabilities
outstanding 118,112,504$ 91,065,988$ 45,828,525$ 40,070,384$ 163,941,029$ 131,136,372$
Other liabilities 16,358,130 12,337,783 7,862,253 8,376,163 24,220,383 20,713,946
Total liabilities 134,470,634$ 103,403,771$ 53,690,778$ 48,446,547$ 188,161,412$ 151,850,318$
Deferred inflows of resources:
Pension plan deferments 5,571,402$ 2,723,965$ 736,009$ 497,553$ 6,307,411$ 3,221,518$
Net position:
Net investment in
capital assets 93,247,973$ 85,838,618$ 85,158,869$ 83,395,794$ 178,406,842$ 169,234,412$
Restricted 20,892,680 16,925,171 804,393 793,664 21,697,073 17,718,835
Unrestricted 22,146,168 21,957,830 17,300,872 16,405,405 39,447,040 38,363,235
Total net position 136,286,821$ 124,721,619$ 103,264,134$ 100,594,863$ 239,550,955$ 225,316,482$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
An additional portion of the City’s net position ($21,697,073) represents resources that are subject to
external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position
($39,447,040) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories
of net position reported, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental
and business-type activities. The same situation held true for the prior fiscal year.
There was an increase of $1,083,805 in unrestricted net position, largely due to positive operating
results in the Utility Fund and a large new assessment for the Arden Park D neighborhood
reconstruction project.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
15
As shown below, the City’s net position increased by $14,234,473 during the current fiscal year.
Factors contributing to this change are discussed in the next two sections.
City of Edina's Changes in Net Position
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Revenues:
Program revenues:
Charges for services 11,738,825$ 11,164,102$ 41,714,434$ 41,063,598$ 53,453,259$ 52,227,700$
Operating grants and
contributions 2,751,495 3,122,178 445,464 595,141 3,196,959 3,717,319
Capital grants and
contributions 15,252,861 10,044,077 - - 15,252,861 10,044,077
General revenues:
Property taxes 31,396,421 29,632,072 - - 31,396,421 29,632,072
Other taxes 5,148,144 3,904,650 - - 5,148,144 3,904,650
Gain on disposal
of assets 65,044 41,900 35,946 39,427 100,990 81,327
Unrestricted investment
earnings 344,277 195,620 136,208 91,907 480,485 287,527
Total revenues 66,697,067 58,104,599 42,332,052 41,790,073 109,029,119 99,894,672
Expenses:
General government 9,587,567 8,518,236 - - 9,587,567 8,518,236
Public safety 20,243,209 19,507,770 - - 20,243,209 19,507,770
Public works 19,444,472 15,284,777 - - 19,444,472 15,284,777
Parks 3,822,716 3,385,367 - - 3,822,716 3,385,367
Interest on long-term debt 2,133,474 2,180,678 - - 2,133,474 2,180,678
Utilities - - 16,780,474 14,963,304 16,780,474 14,963,304
Liquor - - 12,130,254 11,818,602 12,130,254 11,818,602
Aquatic center - - 915,560 872,960 915,560 872,960
Golf course - - 3,041,169 3,409,343 3,041,169 3,409,343
Arena - - 2,842,660 2,642,097 2,842,660 2,642,097
Community activity
centers - - 3,853,091 3,436,325 3,853,091 3,436,325
Total expenses 55,231,438 48,876,828 39,563,208 37,142,631 94,794,646 86,019,459
Increase in net position
before transfers 11,465,629 9,227,771 2,768,844 4,647,442 14,234,473 13,875,213
Transfers 99,573 (2,230,966) (99,573) 2,230,966 - -
Change in net position 11,565,202 6,996,805 2,669,271 6,878,408 14,234,473 13,875,213
Net position - January 1 124,721,619 117,724,814 100,594,863 93,716,455 225,316,482 211,441,269
Net position - December 31 136,286,821$ 124,721,619$ 103,264,134$ 100,594,863$ 239,550,955$ 225,316,482$
Governmental Activities Business-type Activities Totals
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
16
Governmental Activities
Governmental activities increased the City's net position by $11,565,202, accounting for 81% of the
total growth in net position. Key elements of the increase are as follows.
Charges for services increased by $574,723, or 5% in 2016. This is primarily a result of
increased building and permit revenue due to continuing residential and commercial
redevelopment growth throughout the City.
Capital grants and contributions increased by $5,208,784, or 52% in 2016. This is primarily a
result of increased special assessment revenue received for various neighborhood
reconstruction projects.
Property taxes increased by $1,764,349 as the result of an increased general operating levy
that provides funding to continue existing service levels that were previously subsidized by
liquor transfers.
Net transfers decreased by $2,330,539. In 2015, large transfers were made from the
construction fund to the arena and sports dome funds to move proceeds initially received in the
construction fund for capital projects at those facilities.
Other taxes increased by $1,243,494 due to an increase in tax increment collections from the
Southdale 2 tax increment financing district.
Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues and
expenses:
Charges for services
17%
Operating grants and
contributions
4%
Capital grants and
contributions
23%
Property taxes
47%
Other taxes
8%
Other
1%
Revenues by Source - Governmental Activities
-
5
10
15
20
25
General
government
Public safety Public works Parks Interest on
long-term
debt
Millions
Expenses and Program Revenues - Governmental
Activities
expenses
program revenue
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
17
Business-type Activities
Business-type activities increased net position by $2,669,271, accounting for 19% of the City's growth
in net position. Key elements of the current year increase before the change in accounting principle are
as follows:
The utility fund had income before transfers of $3,181,939 for 2016. This additional equity is
used to invest in new and rebuilt utility infrastructure according to the City’s CIP and utility rate
study.
The liquor fund had income before transfer of $828,326 for 2016. This majority of the additional
equity is used to subsidize operations at other enterprise facilities.
Charges for
services
99%
Operating grants
and
contributions
1%
Revenues by Source - Business-type Activities
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Utilities Liquor Aquatic
center
Golf course Arena Community
activity
centers
Millions
Expenses and Program Revenues - Business-type
Activities
expenses
program revenue
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
18
Financial Analysis of the City's Funds
As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-
related legal requirements.
Governmental Funds. The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-
term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing
the City’s financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful
measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund
balances of $54,181,877, an increase of $9,642,149 in comparison with the prior year. Approximately
27% of this total amount ($14,433,910) constitutes unassigned fund balance. The remainder of the fund
balance is 1) nonspendable due to prepaid items ($27,643), 2) restricted by external creditors, grantors,
laws or regulations ($24,998,646), or 3) assigned by internal constraints ($14,721,678).
The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned
fund balance of the general fund was $14,624,755. As a measure of the general fund’s liquidity,
unassigned fund balance represents 41% of total general fund expenditures.
The fund balance of the City’s general fund increased by $2,871,928 during the current fiscal year. Key
factors in this increase are as follows:
Total general fund revenues were $3,018,401 over budget, including higher than expected
building permit activity. General fund license and permit revenues increased by 7.6% in the
current fiscal year after a 7.5% and 8.9% increase in 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Total general fund expenditures were $658,069 under budget. Much of this savings occurred
in the police and public works departments as a result of less being spent on contractual
services than anticipated. The City’s central service divisions also came in under budget in
2016 resulting in fewer expenses being charged back to the general fund.
The liquor fund transferred $100,000 of profits to the general fund, as planned in the 2016
budget.
Transfers out of the general fund totaled $804,542 related to the 2015 unassigned fund balance
and parkland dedication fees transferred to fund various construction projects.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund balance increased by $3,777,787 in the current fiscal
year due to unanticipated revenue received from a development to be spent on affordable housing. In
addition, there was less capital outlay spending than anticipated. Discussions were held regarding
various redevelopment projects, and increased capital outlay spending anticipated for future years.
The debt service fund has a total fund balance of $11,187,468, all of which is restricted for the payment
of debt service. The net increase in fund balance during the current year in the debt service fund was
$4,052,893. Fund balance increased as the result of the general obligation refunding bond, series
2016A that was issued in 2016 in the amount of $16,350,000 and refunded $3,635,000 of debt service
fund bonds in February 2017.
The construction fund balance decreased by $240,904 in 2016 due to capital outlay related to various
projects. Also, new debt was issued in 2016 to help finance various street improvement projects.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
19
Proprietary funds. The City’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the
government-wide financial statements, but in more detail.
Unrestricted net position of the utility fund at the end of the year amounted to $15,458,755. The total
growth in net position from current year operations was $3,081,939. Operating revenues in the utilities
fund increased by .7% while expenses increased by 12.8% in 2016. The minimal revenue increase was
due to an increase in the water, sewer and storm rates offset by less consumption. Expenses increased
as a result of higher depreciation expenses related to infrastructure projects completed in recent years,
along with increased fees set by the Metropolitan Council for sewer service. The City invested
$8,794,245 in utility fund capital assets during 2016.
Unrestricted net position of the liquor fund at the end of the year amounted to $630,261. Total net
position increased by $128,326 from current year operations. The liquor fund continues to transfer
profits back into other City funds, including the general, construction, golf course, arena, centennial
lakes and art center funds. The liquor fund made transfers totaling $700,000 to other funds during 2016.
Unrestricted net position of the aquatic center fund at the end of the year amounted to $598,594.
Aquatic center revenues decreased by 1.6% from 2015 due to less favorable weather in 2016. The
aquatic center remains profitable.
Unrestricted net position of the golf course fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of
($856,034) a decrease of $682,607 from the prior year. The newly redesigned Par 3 course opened in
August 2016 and the 27-hole regulation course closed in October 2016 for renovations, resulting in
$47,488 in less revenue compared to 2015. In addition, the braemar memorial fund transferred
$156,871 to the golf course in 2015 to subsidize capital improvements; no such transfer was received
in 2016.
Unrestricted net position of the arena fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($409,470), a
decrease of $56,463 from the prior year. Expenses increased as a result of higher depreciation
expenses related to the backyard rink project.
General Fund Budgetary Highlights
During the year, there was an $804,542 increase in appropriations between the original and final
amended budget. The increase is the result of transfers to the construction fund of unassigned general
fund balance according to the City’s fund balance policy along with parkland dedication fees transferred
for the centennial lakes bridge project.
During the year, revenues were $3,018,401 more than budget, as the continued commercial and
residential redevelopment of the City increased our licenses and permits and parkland dedication
revenues, which exceeded budget by $2,419,774.
During the year, expenditures were $658,069 under budget; much of the savings occurred in the
police and public works departments as a result of less being spent on contractual services than
anticipated. The City’s central service divisions also came in under budget in 2016 resulting in fewer
expenses being charged back to the general fund.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
20
Capital Asset and Debt Administration
Capital assets. The City’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business type activities
as of December 31, 2016, amounted to $293,110,066 (net of accumulated depreciation). This
investment in capital assets included land, land improvements, intangible assets such as easements,
infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), buildings, vehicles, equipment,
parks, and construction in progress. The total increase in the City’s investment in capital assets for the
current fiscal year was 3.7% (a 4.0% increase for governmental activities and a 3.3% increase for
business-type activities).
Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following:
The City completed construction on the sports dome; the remaining $3,416,375 of the project
was capitalized for a total project cost of $9,091,327.
The City completed construction on the outdoor rink at the arena; the remaining $1,070,841 of
the project was capitalized for a total project cost of $3,160,070.
A variety of street construction, sidewalk and park projects; construction in progress as of the
close of the fiscal year reached $12,176,272.
A variety of utility infrastructure improvements, including watermain, sanitary and storm sewer,
construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $7,604,149 in the utility fund.
The City completed the Arden Park D and Birchcrest B neighborhoods utility and street
reconstruction projects; total construction cost was $7,600,470.
City of Edina’s Capital Assets
(Net of Depreciation)
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
Land and land
improvements 29,081,323$ 27,379,588$ 5,544,269$ 3,230,890$ 34,625,592$ 30,610,478$
Easements 253,000 253,000 - - 253,000 253,000
Buildings and structures 41,999,729 43,816,890 23,207,049 20,150,029 65,206,778 63,966,919
Machinery and equipment 6,210,384 5,906,091 6,738,236 6,578,366 12,948,620 12,484,457
Infrastructure 63,484,786 51,625,947 83,361,780 74,783,668 146,846,566 126,409,615
Parks 11,793,813 8,260,392 - - 11,793,813 8,260,392
Construction in progress 12,176,272 21,353,521 9,259,425 19,217,587 21,435,697 40,571,108
Total 164,999,307$ 158,595,429$ 128,110,759$ 123,960,540$ 293,110,066$ 282,555,969$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in Note 3.
Long-term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long-term debt
outstanding of $116,893,220, an increase of $5,803,625 from 2017. This increase resulted from
$16,350,000 in new debt, offset by payment of previously scheduled principal payments.
$27,935,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and
special assessments. This amount increased from 2015 due to a new debt issue that refunded the
2007A bond in February 2017.
$25,920,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City’s special
assessment program. This amount increased from 2015 due to regularly scheduled principal payments
offset by newly issued debt of $3,940,000.
Also outstanding is $20,390,000 HRA public project revenue bonds which financed two gymnasiums,
the new public works facility, sports dome, outdoor rink at the arena, and improvements to Pamela
Park. This amount decreased in 2016 due to regularly scheduled principal payments.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
21
There is a total of $42,620,000 in revenue bonds for improvements to the enterprise funds. This amount
increased $3,475,000 during the year due to $8,775,000 in issued debt offset by $5,300,000 in regularly
scheduled principal payments. The issued debt is being used to finance various utility infrastructure
improvement projects.
City of Edina’s Outstanding Debt
2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015
General obligation bonds 27,935,000$ 26,710,000$ -$ -$ 27,935,000$ 26,710,000$
Public improvement bonds 25,920,000 23,905,000 - - 25,920,000 23,905,000
Public project revenue bonds 20,390,000 21,290,000 - - 20,390,000 21,290,000
Edina emerald energy program bonds 28,220 39,595 - - 28,220 39,595
Revenue bonds - - 42,620,000 39,145,000 42,620,000 39,145,000
Total 74,273,220$ 71,944,595$ 42,620,000$ 39,145,000$ 116,893,220$ 111,089,595$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
The City maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AAA rating from Standard & Poor’s.
State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue up to 3% of total
Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City is $308,890,246. Only $48,325,000 of
the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory limitation.
Additional information on the City’s long-term debt can be found in Note 4.
Economic Factors and Next Year’s Budget
The City strives to provide an uncommonly high quality of life for our residents and businesses and the
relatively healthy local economy helps to make this goal a reality. The unemployment rate in Edina for
December 2016 was 3.08%, well below the state and national levels. The City is home to Southdale
Center, the nation’s first fully enclosed climate-controlled regional shopping mall, Fairview Southdale
hospital, as well as several corporate headquarters. In addition to its healthy economy, Edina is known
for excellent public schools, as the Edina school system has been consistently selected as one of the
best in the country. Ninety-eight percent of students graduate, with ninety-four percent pursuing some
sort of post-secondary education.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
22
Property values in Edina increased for several years through 2008, but values declined from 2009-
2012 and are back on the rise in 2013-2016. Estimated market value of real estate increased 4.9% for
taxes payable in 2017.
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Market Value and Tax Capacity
Annual Changes Tax Capacity
Market Value
The City collects property taxes based on tax capacity, which roughly equals estimated market value
multiplied by class rates for different types of parcels (commercial, residential, etc.). Class rates are set
by state statute. Tax capacity for real estate increased 5.2% for taxes payable in 2017, and remained
positive for the fourth consecutive year.
All of these factors above were considered in preparing the City’s budget for the 2017 fiscal year. The
City’s adopted 2017 budget includes a property tax levy of $33,822,369 for all funds, an increase of
6.4% from the 2016 levy, with the increase being attributed to new levies for the City’s capital
improvement plan, HRA operating expenses, Weber Woods land purchase, and an increase in the
general operating levy to fund street and bridge maintenance.
Requests for Information
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City’s finances for all those with
an interest in the government’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this
report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Office of the Finance
Director, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. The City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report can also be found on the internet at www.edinamn.gov.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
December 31, 2016
Governmental Business-type
Activities Activities Total
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and investments 52,880,717$ 19,075,996$ 71,956,713$
Restricted cash and investments 4,105,966 1,668,491 5,774,457
Accrued interest 111,371 42,229 153,600
Accounts receivable, net 944,357 3,992,989 4,937,346
Special assessments receivable 20,929,273 644,204 21,573,477
Due from other governments 719,934 7,898 727,832
Prepaid items 317,023 122,275 439,298
Inventory - 1,413,388 1,413,388
Total current assets 80,008,641 26,967,470 106,976,111
Noncurrent assets:
Investment in joint powers agreement 1,770,353 - 1,770,353
Nondepreciable capital assets 34,495,555 9,544,766 44,040,321
Depreciable capital assets (net) 130,503,752 118,565,993 249,069,745
Total noncurrent assets 166,769,660 128,110,759 294,880,419
Deferred outflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 29,550,556 2,612,692 32,163,248
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 276,328,857 157,690,921 434,019,778
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 1,337,290 738,640 2,075,930
Salaries payable 751,798 157,531 909,329
Accrued interest payable 994,996 518,334 1,513,330
Contracts payable 639,628 252,694 892,322
Due to other governments 18,274 179,355 197,629
Deposits payable 1,440,261 13,400 1,453,661
Unearned revenue 293,643 103,374 397,017
Compensated absences payable 1,612,240 358,925 1,971,165
Bonds payable 9,270,000 5,540,000 14,810,000
Total current liabilities 16,358,130 7,862,253 24,220,383
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 1,945,802 208,486 2,154,288
Net pension liability 47,161,042 6,253,966 53,415,008
Compensated absences payable 2,418,360 538,386 2,956,746
Bonds payable, net 66,587,300 38,827,687 105,414,987
Total noncurrent liabilities 118,112,504 45,828,525 163,941,029
Deferred inflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 5,571,402 736,009 6,307,411
Total liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources 140,042,036 54,426,787 194,468,823
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 93,247,973 85,158,869 178,406,842
Restricted for tax increments 9,799,747 - 9,799,747
Restricted for affordable housing 2,000,000 - 2,000,000
Restricted for debt service 7,081,502 804,393 7,885,895
Restricted for energy efficiency projects 209,510 - 209,510
Restricted for parkland dedication 927,673 - 927,673
Restricted for police special revenue 541,865 - 541,865
Restricted for braemar golf donations 148,083 - 148,083
Restricted for arts and culture donations 9,555 - 9,555
Restricted for conservation and sustainability initiatives 174,745 - 174,745
Unrestricted 22,146,168 17,300,872 39,447,040
Total net position 136,286,821$ 103,264,134$ 239,550,955$
Primary Government
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
23
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Operating Capital
Charges for Grants and Grants and
Expenses Services Contributions Contributions
Functions/Programs
Primary government:
Governmental activities:
General government 9,587,567$ 1,453,009$ 1,177,846$ 2,000,000$
Public safety 20,243,209 8,996,046 1,310,761 -
Public works 19,444,472 517,510 218,405 11,499,401
Parks 3,822,716 772,260 44,483 1,753,460
Interest on long-term debt 2,133,474 - - -
Total government activities 55,231,438 11,738,825 2,751,495 15,252,861
Business-type activities:
Utilities 16,780,474 19,505,905 345,097 -
Liquor 12,130,254 12,937,092 11,350 -
Aquatic center 915,560 956,068 30,000 -
Golf course 3,041,169 2,809,702 16,982 -
Arena 2,842,660 2,314,892 2,513 -
Community activity centers 3,853,091 3,190,775 39,522 -
Total business-type activities 39,563,208 41,714,434 445,464 -
Total primary government 94,794,646$ 53,453,259$ 3,196,959$ 15,252,861$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Program Revenues
24
Governmental Business-type
Activities Activities Total
(4,956,712)$ -$ (4,956,712)$
(9,936,402) - (9,936,402)
(7,209,156) - (7,209,156)
(1,252,513) - (1,252,513)
(2,133,474) - (2,133,474)
(25,488,257) - (25,488,257)
- 3,070,528 3,070,528
- 818,188 818,188
- 70,508 70,508
- (214,485) (214,485)
- (525,255) (525,255)
- (622,794) (622,794)
- 2,596,690 2,596,690
(25,488,257) 2,596,690 (22,891,567)
General revenues:
Property taxes 31,396,421 - 31,396,421
Tax increment collections 2,779,097 - 2,779,097
Franchise taxes 2,346,423 - 2,346,423
Lodging taxes 22,624 - 22,624
Unrestricted investment earnings 344,277 136,208 480,485
Gain on disposal of capital assets 65,044 35,946 100,990
Transfers 99,573 (99,573) -
Total general revenues and transfers 37,053,459 72,581 37,126,040
Change in net position 11,565,202 2,669,271 14,234,473
Net position - beginning 124,721,619 100,594,863 225,316,482
Net position - ending 136,286,821$ 103,264,134$ 239,550,955$
Net (Expense) Revenue and
Changes in Net Position
25
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
BALANCE SHEET
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Housing & Nonmajor Total
Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental
General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds
Assets
Cash and Investments 19,248,526$ 11,794,011$ 7,067,860$ 13,739,485$ 1,030,835$ 52,880,717$
Restricted cash and
investments - - 4,105,966 - - 4,105,966
Accrued interest 39,690 26,043 4,723 37,374 3,541 111,371
Accounts receivable 541,607 - - 29,986 354,294 925,887
Special assessments
receivable - - 2,595,035 18,334,238 - 20,929,273
Due from other funds 26,597 - - 443,935 - 470,532
Due from other governments 541,584 100,000 29,917 38,968 9,465 719,934
Prepaid items 27,643 - - - - 27,643
Total assets 20,425,647$ 11,920,054$ 13,803,501$ 32,623,986$ 1,398,135$ 80,171,323$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 843,962$ 118,373$ 4,755$ 283,803$ 6,405$ 1,257,298$
Salaries payable 742,482 1,934 - 3,195 4,187 751,798
Contracts payable - - - 589,060 50,568 639,628
Due to other funds - - - - 443,935 443,935
Due to other governments 18,274 - - - - 18,274
Deposits payable 1,440,261 - - - - 1,440,261
Unearned revenue 2,085 - - 291,558 - 293,643
Total liabilities 3,047,064 120,307 4,755 1,167,616 505,095 4,844,837
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue - taxes 186,272 - 16,243 12,694 127 215,336
Unavailable revenue -
special assessments - - 2,595,035 18,334,238 - 20,929,273
Total deferred inflows of
resources 186,272 - 2,611,278 18,346,932 127 21,144,609
Fund balance:
Nonspendable 27,643 - - - - 27,643
Restricted 927,673 11,799,747 11,187,468 - 1,083,758 24,998,646
Assigned 1,612,240 - - 13,109,438 - 14,721,678
Unassigned 14,624,755 - - - (190,845) 14,433,910
Total fund balance 17,192,311 11,799,747 11,187,468 13,109,438 892,913 54,181,877
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources,
and fund balances 20,425,647$ 11,920,054$ 13,803,501$ 32,623,986$ 1,398,135$ 80,171,323$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
26
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
December 31, 2016
Total fund balances - governmental funds 54,181,877$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because:
Cost of capital assets 286,168,830
Accumulated depreciation (121,169,523)
Bonds payable (74,273,220)
Premium on bonds (1,989,676)
Discount on bonds 405,596
Compensated absences payable (4,030,600)
Net OPEB obligation (1,945,802)
Net pension obligation (47,161,042)
(994,996)
1,770,353
Deferred outflows - pension plans 29,550,556
Deferred inflows - pension plans (5,571,402)
Deferred inflows - property taxes 215,336
Deferred inflows - special assessments 20,929,273
201,261
Total net position - governmental activities 136,286,821$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The recognition of certain revenues and expenditures differ between the full accrual governmental
activities financial statements and the modified accrual governmental fund financial statements.
Capital assets are included in net position, but are excluded from fund balances because they do not
represent financial resources.
Long-term liabilities are included in net positon, but are excluded from fund balances until due and
payable. Debt issuance premiums and discounts are excluded from net position until amortized, but are
included in fund balances upon issuance as other financing sources and uses
Accrued interest payable on long-term debt is included in net position, but is excluded from fund
balances until due and payable.
Investment in joint powers agreement are not available to pay for current-period expenditures, and
therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual
funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service fund are included in the governmental activities
in the Statement of Net Position.
27
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Housing & Nonmajor Total
Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental
General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds
Revenues:
General property taxes 24,681,406$ -$ 4,998,092$ 1,654,525$ 20,000$ 31,354,023$
Tax increment collections - 2,779,097 - - - 2,779,097
Franchise taxes 870,690 - - 99,927 1,375,806 2,346,423
Lodging tax 22,624 - - - - 22,624
Special assessments - - 224,778 5,051,416 - 5,276,194
License and permits 5,192,934 - - 75,585 - 5,268,519
Intergovernmental 1,398,980 50,000 - 3,964,655 361,479 5,775,114
Charges for services 4,449,894 31,094 - 208,401 - 4,689,389
Fines and forfeitures 946,199 - - - 70,618 1,016,817
Investment income 125,095 82,091 6,080 123,055 8,023 344,344
Rental of property 514,955 - - - - 514,955
Parkland dedication 1,250,000 - - - - 1,250,000
Other revenues 127,496 2,000,000 - 305,212 167,122 2,599,830
Total revenues 39,580,273 4,942,282 5,228,950 11,482,776 2,003,048 63,237,329
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 6,155,261 512,471 - 22,869 125,124 6,815,725
Public safety 18,408,651 - - 13,974 131,882 18,554,507
Public works 9,934,494 - - 407,636 131,878 10,474,008
Parks 1,505,397 - - 7,618 16,369 1,529,384
Capital outlay:
General government - 464,597 - 1,485,298 - 1,949,895
Public safety - - - 949,387 49,607 998,994
Public works - 187,427 - 9,461,941 2,319,861 11,969,229
Parks - - - 1,838,425 31,032 1,869,457
Debt service:
Bond principal - - 5,246,375 - - 5,246,375
Interest and fiscal charges - - 2,360,827 - - 2,360,827
Total expenditures 36,003,803 1,164,495 7,607,202 14,187,148 2,805,753 61,768,401
Revenues over
(under) expenditures 3,576,470 3,777,787 (2,378,252) (2,704,372) (802,705) 1,468,928
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 100,000 - 2,400,000 1,004,542 - 3,504,542
Transfers out (804,542) - - (2,583,577) (16,850) (3,404,969)
Sale of capital assets - - - 65,044 - 65,044
Bonds issued - - 171,933 3,768,067 - 3,940,000
Refunding bonds issued - - 3,635,000 - - 3,635,000
Premium on bonds issued - - 232,276 218,133 - 450,409
Discount on bonds issued - - (8,064) (8,741) - (16,805)
Total other financing
sources (uses) (704,542) - 6,431,145 2,463,468 (16,850) 8,173,221
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance 2,871,928 3,777,787 4,052,893 (240,904) (819,555) 9,642,149
Fund balance - January 1 14,320,383 8,021,960 7,134,575 13,350,342 1,712,468 44,539,728
Fund balance - December 31 17,192,311$ 11,799,747$ 11,187,468$ 13,109,438$ 892,913$ 54,181,877$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
28
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Total net change in fund balances - governmental funds 9,642,149$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:
Capital outlays 14,865,042
Depreciation expense (8,461,164)
Investment in joint powers agreement 185,888
3,291,805
(7,575,000)
5,246,375
(18,353)
(187,898)
Net pension liability (28,258,345)
Net OPEB obiligation (209,384)
Compensated absences payable (162,106)
Deferred outflows - pension plans 25,907,005
Deferred inflows - pension plans (2,847,437)
146,625
Change in net position - governmental activities 11,565,202$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Capital assets are recorded in net position and the cost is allocated over their estimated useful lives as
depreciation expense. However, fund balances are reduced for the full cost of capital outlays at the
time of purchase.
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual
funds. The change in net position of the internal service funds is included in the governmental activities
in the Statement of Activities.
Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources (property tax
and special assessment receivables) are not reported as revenues in the funds.
The amount of debt issued is reported in the governmental funds as a source of financing. Debt
obligations are not revenues in the Statement of Activities, but rather constitute long-term liabilities.
Certain expenses are included in the change in net position, but do not require the use of current
funds, and are not included in the change in fund balances.
The recognition of certain revenues and expenditures differ between the full accural governmental
activities financial statements and the modified accrual governmental fund financial statements.
Repayment of long-term debt does not affect the change in net position. However, it reduces fund
balances.
Debt issuance premiums and discounts are included in the change in net position as they are
amortized over the life of the debt. However, they are included in the change in fund balances upon
issuance as other financing sources and uses.
Interest on long-term debt is included in the change in net position as it accrues, regardless of when
payment is due. However, they are included in the change in fund balances when due.
29
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and investments 13,081,553$ 1,241,466$ 1,323,153$ 110,223$ -$ 3,319,601$ 19,075,996$ -$
Restricted cash and investments 1,668,491 - - - - - 1,668,491 -
Interest receivable 23,047 3,234 4,103 2,659 - 9,186 42,229 -
Accounts receivable, net 3,656,158 409 - 11,372 312,138 12,912 3,992,989 18,470
Special assessments receivable 644,204 - - - - - 644,204 -
Due from other funds - - - - - 44,719 44,719 -
Due from other governments 7,898 - - - - - 7,898 -
Prepaid expenses 36,000 - 86,275 - - - 122,275 289,380
Inventory 11,979 1,330,831 - 63,592 - 6,986 1,413,388 -
Total current assets 19,129,330 2,575,940 1,413,531 187,846 312,138 3,393,404 27,012,189 307,850
Noncurrent assets:
Net capital assets 95,908,301 1,618,176 1,791,182 9,026,398 9,776,406 9,990,296 128,110,759 -
Deferred outlflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 630,650 630,650 - 360,371 270,278 720,743 2,612,692 -
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 115,668,281 4,824,766 3,204,713 9,574,615 10,358,822 14,104,443 157,735,640 307,850
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 244,540 333,603 807 29,762 60,748 69,180 738,640 79,992
Salaries payable 39,525 36,758 - 22,177 21,619 37,452 157,531 -
Accrued interest payable 424,991 - 1,262 37,566 54,515 - 518,334 -
Contracts payable 145,759 - - 47,901 34,254 24,780 252,694 -
Due to other funds - - - - 44,719 - 44,719 26,597
Due to other governments 5,602 146,273 75 3,872 7,990 15,543 179,355 -
Deposits payable - - 8,400 5,000 - - 13,400 -
Unearned revenue - 12,317 - 81,495 317 9,245 103,374 -
Compensated absences payable 70,280 128,551 - 84,401 22,206 53,487 358,925 -
Bonds payable - current 5,040,000 - 85,000 185,000 230,000 - 5,540,000 -
Total current liabilities 5,970,697 657,502 95,544 497,174 476,368 209,687 7,906,972 106,589
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 55,142 38,766 - 49,242 23,361 41,975 208,486 -
Net pension liability 1,509,578 1,509,578 - 862,616 646,962 1,725,232 6,253,966 -
Compensated absences payable 105,419 192,826 - 126,601 33,310 80,230 538,386 -
Bonds payable, net of
unamortized discounts and premiums 31,650,439 - - 2,992,155 4,185,093 - 38,827,687 -
Total noncurrent liabilities 33,320,578 1,741,170 - 4,030,614 4,888,726 1,847,437 45,828,525 -
Deferred inflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 177,657 177,657 - 101,519 76,139 203,037 736,009 -
Total liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources 39,468,932 2,576,329 95,544 4,629,307 5,441,233 2,260,161 54,471,506 106,589
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 60,740,594 1,618,176 1,706,182 5,801,342 5,327,059 9,965,516 85,158,869 -
Restricted for debt service - - 804,393 - - - 804,393 -
Unrestricted 15,458,755 630,261 598,594 (856,034) (409,470) 1,878,766 17,300,872 201,261
Total net position 76,199,349$ 2,248,437$ 3,109,169$ 4,945,308$ 4,917,589$ 11,844,282$ 103,264,134$ 201,261$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
30
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Operating revenues:
Sales - liquor -$ 12,671,649$ -$ 3,144$ -$ -$ 12,674,793$ -$
Sales - retail - 265,443 6,224 216,537 40,243 49,037 577,484 -
Sales - utilities 18,473,292 - - - - - 18,473,292 -
Sales - concessions - - 113,972 577 327,401 158,596 600,546 -
Memberships - - 389,817 77,544 - 140,578 607,939 -
Admissions - - 392,839 319,938 26,547 628,225 1,367,549 -
Building rental - - 52,876 115,716 1,774,409 747,899 2,690,900 -
Rental of equipment - - - 337,024 5,084 171,625 513,733 -
Greens fees - - - 1,360,192 - 232,700 1,592,892 -
Other fees 999,353 - 340 379,030 141,075 1,062,115 2,581,913 731,508
Total operating revenues 19,472,645 12,937,092 956,068 2,809,702 2,314,759 3,190,775 41,681,041 731,508
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales and services - 9,625,215 40,442 169,131 124,582 92,300 10,051,670 -
Personal services 2,244,587 1,490,106 359,044 1,342,085 986,768 1,897,309 8,319,899 97,950
Contractual services 8,054,346 585,263 147,228 456,824 783,974 680,616 10,708,251 589,822
Commodities 841,148 67,125 86,024 260,722 126,274 343,635 1,724,928 -
Central Services 650,497 253,823 32,557 127,369 66,969 176,366 1,307,581 -
Depreciation 4,431,633 108,722 248,242 612,166 622,911 662,865 6,686,539 -
Total operating expenses 16,222,211 12,130,254 913,537 2,968,297 2,711,478 3,853,091 38,798,868 687,772
Operating income (loss)3,250,434 806,838 42,531 (158,595) (396,719) (662,316) 2,882,173 43,736
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Intergovernmental 345,097 - - - - - 345,097 -
Investment income (charges) 75,465 10,138 13,007 8,816 - 28,782 136,208 (67)
Donations - - 30,000 - 2,513 36,668 69,181 -
Interest and fiscal charges (868,832) - (2,562) (90,919) (131,166) - (1,093,479) -
Amortization of bond premiums
(discounts) 310,569 - 539 2,047 (16) - 313,139 -
Gain (loss) on sale of capital assets 35,946 - - 16,000 - - 51,946 -
Miscellaneous 33,260 11,350 - 16,982 133 2,854 64,579 102,956
Total nonoperating
revenues (expenses)(68,495) 21,488 40,984 (47,074) (128,536) 68,304 (113,329) 102,889
Income (loss) before transfers 3,181,939 828,326 83,515 (205,669) (525,255) (594,012) 2,768,844 146,625
Transfers:
Transfers in - - - 150,000 209,861 340,566 700,427 -
Transfers out (100,000) (700,000) - - - - (800,000) -
Total transfers (100,000) (700,000) - 150,000 209,861 340,566 (99,573) -
Change in net position 3,081,939 128,326 83,515 (55,669) (315,394) (253,446) 2,669,271 146,625
Net position - January 1 73,117,410 2,120,111 3,025,654 5,000,977 5,232,983 12,097,728 100,594,863 54,636
Net position - December 31 76,199,349$ 2,248,437$ 3,109,169$ 4,945,308$ 4,917,589$ 11,844,282$103,264,134$ 201,261$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
31
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Cash flows from operating activities:
Receipts from customers and users 19,429,214$ 12,938,644$ 969,144$ 2,802,791$ 2,281,028$ 3,331,618$ 41,752,439$ 713,038$
Payment to suppliers (9,156,178) (10,639,006) (310,166) (989,033) (1,092,289) (1,337,375) (23,524,047) (799,210)
Payment to employees (2,108,294) (1,381,827) (359,044) (1,264,954) (942,049) (1,753,825) (7,809,993) (97,950)
Donations received - - 30,000 - 2,513 36,668 69,181 -
Miscellaneous received 33,260 11,350 - 16,982 133 2,854 64,579 102,956
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities 8,198,002 929,161 329,934 565,786 249,336 279,940 10,552,159 (81,166)
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
State grant 345,097 - - - - - 345,097 -
Transfer from other funds - - - 150,000 209,861 340,566 700,427 -
Transfer to other funds (100,000) (700,000) - - - - (800,000) -
Proceeds from interfund borrowing - - - - 44,719 7,103 51,822 26,597
Payment of interfund borrowing - - - - (7,103) (44,719) (51,822) -
Net cash provided by (used in)
noncapital financing activities 245,097 (700,000) - 150,000 247,477 302,950 245,524 26,597
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Proceeds from capital debt 9,350,611 - - - - - 9,350,611 -
Acquisition of capital assets (8,794,245) (108,774) (183,311) (1,936,496) (133,996) (585,887) (11,742,709) -
Proceeds from disposals
of capital assets 35,946 - - 16,000 - - 51,946 -
Principal paid on bonds (4,925,000) - (80,000) (65,000) (230,000) - (5,300,000) -
Interest and fiscal charges paid on bonds (814,238) - (3,750) (94,718) (132,817) - (1,045,523) -
Net cash provided by (used in)
capital and related
financing activities (5,146,926) (108,774) (267,061) (2,080,214) (496,813) (585,887) (8,685,675) -
Cash flows from investing activities:
Interest received 76,635 9,507 12,041 7,929 - 27,003 133,115 8
Net increase (decrease)
in cash and investments 3,372,808 129,894 74,914 (1,356,499) - 24,006 2,245,123 (54,561)
Cash and investments -
January 1 11,377,236 1,111,572 1,248,239 1,466,722 - 3,295,595 18,499,364 54,561
Cash and investments -
December 31 14,750,044$ 1,241,466$ 1,323,153$ 110,223$ -$ 3,319,601$ 20,744,487$ -$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
32
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
Reconciliation of operating income to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities:
Operating income (loss) 3,250,434$ 806,838$ 42,531$ (158,595)$ (396,719)$ (662,316)$ 2,882,173$ 43,736$
Adjustments to reconcile operating income
(loss) to net cash flows provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation 4,431,633 108,722 248,242 612,166 622,911 662,865 6,686,539 -
Donations - - 30,000 - 2,513 36,668 69,181 -
Miscellaneous revenue (expense) 33,260 11,350 - 16,982 133 2,854 64,579 102,956
Changes in assets, deferred outflows of resources,
liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources:
Decrease (increase) in receivables 16,195 (409) 4,676 (8,517) (33,731) 140,993 119,207 (18,470)
Decrease (increase) in
special assessments (94,951) - - - - - (94,951) -
Decrease (increase) in
due from other governments 35,325 - - - - - 35,325 -
Decrease (increase) in inventory 7,357 (173,986) - 20,118 - 1,665 (144,846) -
Decrease (increase) in
prepaid expenses 376,866 - (3,800) - - - 373,066 (289,380)
Decrease (increase) in deferred
outflows of resources (492,734) (492,733) - (281,562) (211,171) (563,124) (2,041,324) -
Increase (decrease) in
accounts payable 6,971 59,922 (190) 4,990 9,802 (49,718) 31,777 79,992
Increase (decrease) in
salaries payable 11,999 10,124 - 5,033 (1,864) 11,252 36,544 -
Increase (decrease) in
due to other governments (1,381) 6,484 75 (95) (292) 3,595 8,386 -
Increase (decrease) in
deposits payable - - 8,400 - - - 8,400 -
Increase (decrease) in
unearned revenue - 1,961 - 1,606 - (150) 3,417 -
Increase (decrease) in
net OPEB obligation 3,131 4,084 - 2,589 1,510 4,416 15,730 -
Increase (decrease) in
net pension liability 536,249 536,249 - 306,428 229,821 612,856 2,221,603 -
Increase (decrease) in
compensated absences 20,090 (7,003) - 11,752 1,755 12,303 38,897 -
Increase (decrease) in deferred
inflows of resources 57,558 57,558 - 32,891 24,668 65,781 238,456 -
Total adjustments 4,947,568 122,323 287,403 724,381 646,055 942,256 7,669,986 (124,902)
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities 8,198,002$ 929,161$ 329,934$ 565,786$ 249,336$ 279,940$ 10,552,159$ (81,166)$
Noncash investing activities:
Increase (decrease) in
fair value of investments (19,458) (2,823) (3,601) (2,364) - (8,017) (36,263) 9
Noncash capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets with
contracts payable 165,134 108,774 - 83,631 105,581 442,831 905,951 -
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
33
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
AGENCY FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Agency Funds
Assets
Cash and investments 723,828$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 39,494$
Contracts payable 292,373
Salaries payable 5,241
Due to other governmental units 386,720
Total liabilities 723,828$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
34
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
35
Note 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The City of Edina (the City) was incorporated in 1888 and operates under the State of Minnesota
Statutory Plan B form of government. The governing body consists of a five-member City Council
elected by voters of the City.
The financial statements of the City have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles) as
applied to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The
following is a summary of significant accounting policies.
A. FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY
The City’s financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, (b)
organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other
organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary
government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity’s financial
statements to be misleading or incomplete. The primary government is financially
accountable for the component unit if it appoints a voting majority of the component unit’s
governing body and is able to impose its will on the component unit or there is a potential
for the component unit to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial
burdens on, the primary government.
As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the
reporting entity include those of the City of Edina (the primary government) and its
component units. The component units discussed below are included in the City's
reporting entity because of the significance of their operational or financial relationships
with the City.
COMPONENT UNITS
In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of
the component unit have been included in the financial reporting entity as a blended
component unit.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the
City. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of
the City’s operations for two reasons. First, the HRA’s governing body is substantively the
same as the governing body of the City. Specifically, the HRA board consists of five
members, all of which are City Council members. Second, management of the City has
operational responsibility for the HRA. Specifically, sales of bonds or other obligations of
the HRA are approved by the City Council; the HRA follows the budget process for City
departments in accordance with City policy; the annual HRA budget is approved by City
Council; the HRA submits its plan for development and redevelopment to the City Council
for approval; lastly, the administrative structure and management practices and policies
of the HRA are approved by the City Council. The activity of the HRA is reported in the
Special Revenue Funds. Separate financial statements are not prepared for the HRA.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
36
B. GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the
statement of activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City.
Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental
revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant
extent on fees and charges for support.
The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a
given function or business-type activity are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses
are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business-type activity.
Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or
directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or
business-type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the
operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business type activity.
Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as
general revenues.
Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds,
and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government-wide
financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise
funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated
information for the remaining nonmajor governmental and enterprise funds is reported in
a single column in the fund financial statements
C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT
PRESENTATION
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources
measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and
fiduciary fund financial statements. The City’s only fiduciary fund type, agency funds, are
custodial in nature and do not have a measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when
earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of
related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they
are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility
requirements imposed by the provider have been met.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial
resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues
are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are
considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon
enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City
considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected
within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded
when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service
expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences, other post-
employment benefits (OPEB), net pension liabilities, and claims and judgments are
recorded only when payment is due.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
37
Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services
and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible
to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the
portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is
considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other
revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received
by the City.
The City reports the following major governmental funds:
The general fund is the government’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all
financial resources of the general government, except those required to be
accounted for in another fund.
The special revenue Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund is used to account
for revenues from several sources (property taxes, bond proceeds, investment
earnings, etc.) that are restricted for housing and redevelopment.
The debt service fund accounts for the payment of principal and interest on General
Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, Public Project Revenue Bonds, and
Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds.
The capital projects construction fund accounts for the various special assessment
and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for
capital improvements as restricted in the City’s capital improvement budget.
The City reports the following major proprietary funds:
The utility fund accounts for the provision of water, sewer and recycling services to
the City’s residents.
The liquor fund accounts for the operation of the City’s three liquor stores.
The aquatic center fund accounts for the operation of the City’s aquatic center.
The golf course fund accounts for the operation of the City’s two golf courses and a
golf dome.
The arena fund accounts for the operation of the City’s ice arena.
Additionally, the City reports the following fund types:
Internal service funds - the risk management internal service fund accounts for
worker’s compensation, volunteer accident, and property/casualty insurance. Internal
service funds operate in a manner similar to enterprise funds; however, they provide
services primarily to other departments within the City.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
38
Agency funds - the police seizure and Public Safety Training Facility funds account
for fees collected for other government agencies and the payroll fund accounts for
payroll deductions withheld from employee paychecks but not yet sent to the
appropriate party (includes federal and state taxes, health care deductions, etc).
As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the
government-wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions
that would be treated as revenues, expenditures or expenses if they involved external
organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu of taxes, are
similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City of Edina. Elimination of these
charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various
functions concerned.
Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for
goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3)
capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated
resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise,
general revenues include all taxes.
Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items.
Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing
and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations.
The principal operating revenues of the City’s enterprise funds and internal service fund
are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for the enterprise
funds and internal service fund include the cost of sales and services, administrative
expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting
this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses.
Aggregated information for the internal service fund is reported in a single column in the
proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal user of the internal services
is the City’s governmental activities, the financial statements of the internal service funds
are consolidated into the governmental column when presented in the government-wide
financial statements. The cost of these services is reported in the appropriate functional
activity.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for an allowable use, it is
the City’s policy to use restricted resources first, then unrestricted resources as they are
needed.
Depreciation expense is included in the direct expenses of each function. Interest on
long-term debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the
Statement of Activities.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
39
D. CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash and Investments
The cash balances of the City and its component units fund are pooled and invested for
the purpose of increasing earnings through investment activities. The pool’s investments
are reported at fair value at year end, except for investments in external investment
pools, which are stated at amortized cost. The City has the ability and intent to hold its
investments to maturity. The individual funds’ portions of the pool’s fair value are
presented as “Cash and investments.” Earnings from such investments are allocated to
the respective funds on the basis of applicable cash balance participation by each fund.
The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash and
investment balances by means of an advance from another fund shown as interfund
receivables in the advancing fund, and an interfund payable in the fund with the deficit,
until adequate resources are received. These interfund balances are eliminated on the
government-wide financial statements.
The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy
established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the
valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other
observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs.
Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using a matrix
pricing technique. Matrix pricing is used to value securities based on the securities’
relationship to benchmark quoted prices.
See Note 2 for the City’s recurring fair value measurements as of December 31, 2016.
Restricted Cash and Investments
Restricted cash and investments represent bond proceeds held for specific purposes.
Earnings on these investments are allocated directly to these funds.
For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the City considers all highly liquid debt
instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the City of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. The proprietary funds’ portion in the government-
wide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalent.
E. RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES
During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds
for goods provided or services rendered. Short-term interfund loans are classified as “due
to/from other funds.” All short-term interfund receivables and payables at December 31,
2016 are planned to be eliminated in 2017. Any residual balances outstanding between
the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-
wide financial statements as “internal balances.”
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
40
Property taxes and special assessments receivables have been reported net of estimated
uncollectible accounts. Because utility bills are considered liens on property, no
estimated uncollectible amounts are established. Uncollectible amounts are not material
for other receivables and have not been reported.
F. REVENUE RECOGNITION
1. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RECOGNITION
The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in
December (levy/assessment date) of each year for collection in the following
year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for
itself, the City, the local School District and other taxing authorities. Such taxes
become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that
date. Real property taxes are payable (by property owners) on May 15 and
October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are payable by
taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of each year. These taxes are collected
by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 7 and December 2 of the
same year. Delinquent collections for November and December are received the
following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes
by property owners. The County possesses this authority.
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes property tax revenue in the period for which the taxes were
levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported.
GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and
available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current and
delinquent taxes and State credits received by the City in July, December and
January are recognized as revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the
County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and taxes
and credits not received at the year-end are classified as delinquent and due
from County taxes receivable. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected by
the City in January are fully offset by deferred inflows of resources because they
are not available to finance current expenditures.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION
Special assessments are levied against benefited properties for the cost or a
portion of the cost of special assessment improvement projects in accordance
with State Statutes. These assessments are collectible by the City over a term of
years usually consistent with the term of the related bond issue. Collection of
annual installments (including interest) is handled by the County Auditor in the
same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do)
prepay future installments without interest or prepayment penalties.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
41
Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel
is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is
determined to be excessive by the City Council or court action. If special
assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeit
sale. Pursuant to State Statutes, a property shall be subject to a tax forfeit sale
after three years unless it is homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational
land in which event the property is subject to such sale after five years.
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes special assessment revenue in the period that the
assessment roll was adopted by the City Council. Uncollectible special
assessments are not material and have not been reported.
GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Revenue from special assessments is recognized by the City when it becomes
measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In
practice, current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are
recognized as revenue for the current year. Special assessments that are
collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following
January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining
delinquent, deferred and special deferred assessments receivable in
governmental funds are completely offset by deferred inflows of resources. The
following is a breakdown of special assessments receivable at December 31,
2016:
Enterprise
Funds
Debt
Service Construction Utilities
Special assessments receivable
Delinquent $53,766 $0 $291,354
Deferred 2,541,269 18,334,238 352,850
Total $2,595,035 $18,334,238 $644,204
Governmental Funds
G. INVENTORIES AND PREPAID ITEMS
Inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost and are recorded as expenses
when consumed rather than when purchased. All inventories use the first-in/first-out
(FIFO) method.
Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are
recorded as prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements and
are recorded as expenses when consumed.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
42
H. CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital assets, which include property, buildings, improvements, equipment, parks,
infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), and intangible assets
such as easements, are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type
activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are also
reported in the proprietary fund financial statements but not in the governmental fund
financial statements.
Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of
more than $10,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of three
years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if
purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated acquisition
market value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that
do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized.
Infrastructure assets include all of the City’s assets since inception.
Property, plant and equipment of the primary government are depreciated using the
straight line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Assets Life
Golf course 10 - 35 years
Land improvements 15 - 50 years
Buildings and structures 15 - 40 years
Furniture and office equipment 5 - 10 years
Vehicles and equipment 3 - 20 years
Parks 5 - 100 years
Utility infrastructure 20 - 50 years
Capital assets that are not depreciated include land, easements, and construction in
progress.
I. COMPENSATED ABSENCES
It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and
sick pay benefits. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and
proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in
governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee
resignations and retirements. In accordance with the provisions of generally accepted
accounting principles no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulating rights to receive
sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized for that portion of accumulating sick
leave benefits that is vested as severance pay. According to City policy, vested sick leave
benefits are liquidated into a health care savings plan upon separation.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
43
J. STATE-WIDE PENSION PLANS
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of
resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public
Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and additions to/deductions from the PERA’s
fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by
the PERA except that the PERA’s fiscal year-end is June 30. For this purpose, plan
contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and
refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms.
Investments are reported at fair value.
The PERA has a special funding situation created by a direct aid contribution made by
the state of Minnesota. The direct aid is a result of the merger of the Minneapolis
Employees Retirement Fund in the PERA on January 1, 2015.
K. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
In the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund
financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as
liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary
fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and
amortized over the life of the bond using the straight-line method. Bonds payable are
reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and
discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of
debt issued plus any premium received is reported as other financing sources. Discounts
on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not
withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service
expenditures.
L. DEFERRED OUTFLOWS/INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate
section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element,
deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a
future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources
(expense/expenditure) until then. The City has one item that qualifies for reporting in this
category. It is the deferred outflows of resources related to pensions reported in the
government-wide and enterprise funds Statement of Net Position. This deferred outflow
results from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of
assumptions, differences between projected and actual earnings on pension plan
investments, and contributions to the plan subsequent to the measurement date and
before the end of the reporting period. These amounts are deferred and amortized as
required under pension standards.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
44
In addition to liabilities, statements of financial position or balance sheets will sometimes
report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial
statement element represents an acquisition of net position that applies to future periods
and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The City
has two items which qualify for reporting in this category.
The first item, unavailable revenue, is reported only in the governmental funds Balance
Sheet. The governmental funds report unavailable revenue from two sources: property
taxes and special assessments. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an
inflow of resources in the period the amounts become available.
The second item, deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, is reported in the
government-wide and enterprise fund Statement of Net Position. This deferred inflow
results from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of
assumptions, and the difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan
investments. These amounts are deferred and amortized as required under pension
standards.
M. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS
Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or
expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for
expenditures/expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund,
are recorded as expenditures/expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of
expenditures/expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Interfund loans are reported as an
interfund loan receivable or payable which offsets the movement of cash between funds.
All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers.
N. FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATION
In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications
that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These
classifications are as follows:
Nonspendable – Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as
prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets.
Restricted – Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints
established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state
statutory provisions.
Committed – Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by
resolution of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any
other purpose unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by
taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
45
Assigned – Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of
amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the
criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In the general fund, assigned
amounts represent intended uses established by the City Council. In the fund
balance policy, authority to assign amounts for specific purposes is limited to the City
Council.
Unassigned – The residual classification for the general fund which also reflects
negative residual amounts in other funds.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy
to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed.
When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City’s
policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3)
unassigned.
O. NET POSITION
In the government-wide financial statements, net position represents the difference
between assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of
resources. Net position is displayed in three components:
Net investment in capital assets - Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated
depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balance of any long-term debt used to build
or acquire the capital assets.
Restricted net position – Consists of net position restricted when there are
limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors,
grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments.
Unrestricted net position – All other net position that do not meet the definition of
“restricted” or “net investment in capital assets.”
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy
to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed.
P. USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect amounts
reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from such estimates.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
46
Note 2 CASH AND INVESTMENTS
A. COMPONENTS OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following:
Deposits 354,060$
Cash on hand 19,215
Investments 78,081,723
78,454,998$
Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows:
Cash and investments - Statement of Net Position 71,956,713$
Restricted cash and investments - Statement of Net Position 5,774,457
Cash and investments - Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 723,828
78,454,998$
The City had restricted investments of $5,774,457 as of December 31, 2016 that
represent unspent bond proceeds to be used for construction projects and debt
payments.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
47
B. DEPOSITS
In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at
depository banks authorized by the City Council, including checking accounts, savings
accounts and certificates of deposit.
The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits:
Custodial credit risk – In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of
a bank failure, the City’s deposits may be lost.
Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit
insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral
pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by federal deposit
insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills,
notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated
“A” or better; revenue obligations rated “AA” or better; irrevocable standard
letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of
deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held
in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an
account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution
that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral.
The City’s investment policy does not contain further restrictions on the types of
collateral required.
At year-end, the carrying amount of the City’s deposits was $354,060 while the
balance on the bank records was $1,312,660. At December 31, 2016, all
deposits were fully covered by federal depository insurance, surety bonds, or by
collateral held by the City’s agent in the City’s name.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
48
C. INVESTMENTS
The City has the following investments at year end:
Fair Value
Measurements
Rating Agency Using < 1 1 to 5 6 to 10 > 10 Total
U.S. Treasuries AA+ S&P Level 1 -$ 297,829$ 451,507$ 774,861$ 1,524,197$
U.S. Treasury Time Deposits N/R N/A Level 1 3,831,980 - - - 3,831,980
SBA Notes AA+ S&P Level 1 - 63,167 - - 63,167
SBA Notes N/R N/A Level 1 - - 16,506 - 16,506
U.S. Agencies AA+ S&P Level 1 1,027,345 9,397,048 976,826 2,446,407 13,847,626
U.S. Agencies AA- S&P Level 1 - 37,930 - - 37,930
Commerical Paper A1+ S&P Level 3 13,592,303 - - - 13,592,303
Municipals AAA S&P Level 2 389,879 504,535 30,891 - 925,305
Municipals AA+ S&P Level 2 70,871 1,022,300 - 1,645,000 2,738,171
Municipals AA S&P Level 2 145,460 2,454,738 1,122,536 - 3,722,734
Municipals AA2 Mdy's Level 2 - 249,525 - - 249,525
Negotiable CD's N/R N/A Level 1 16,370,903 10,358,372 237,145 - 26,966,420
35,428,741$ 24,385,444$ 2,835,411$ 4,866,268$ 67,515,864
Money Market* AAAm S&P N/A 4,413,777
Money Market* AA+ S&P N/A 38,294
4M Fund* N/R N/A N/A 6,113,788
Total investments 78,081,723$
N/A - Not Applicable
N/R - Not Rated
* - The City's money market investments do not have maturities
Credit Risk
Investment
Maturity Duration in Years
Interest Risk -
The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is regulated by Minnesota
Statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is
an external investment pool not registered with the Securities Exchange Commission
(SEC) that follows the same regulatory rules of the SEC. The City’s investment in the 4M
Fund is measured at amortized cost which approximates fair value. Money markets and
mutual fund investments are also valued at amortized cost.
Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most
significant:
Custodial credit risk – For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a
failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker-dealer)
the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral
securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The City’s investment
policy specifically addresses custodial credit risk, requiring the City to limit its
exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of
who holds the securities.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
49
Credit risk – This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment
will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City’s investments to
direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies;
shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment
Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of
the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the
investments have a final maturity of thirteen months or less; general obligations
rated “AA” or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency rated “A” or better; bankers’ acceptances of United States banks eligible
for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by
United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest
quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and
maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a
United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United
States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest
categories; repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending
agreements with financial institutions qualified as a “depository” by the
government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System
with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, that are a primary reporting dealer in
U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain
Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The City’s investment policies specifically
address credit risk, further limiting the City’s exposure to credit risk by requiring
that all state and local government obligations to be rated “AA” or better by a
national rating agency.
Concentration risk – This is the risk associated with investing a significant
portion of the City’s investment (considered 5 percent or more) in the securities
of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as Treasuries),
investment pools, and mutual funds. The City’s investment policies specifically
address the City’s desire to limit concentration risk, but do not set specific
guidelines for measurement of this risk. At year-end, the City’s investments
include 17.4% in commercial paper with U.S. Bank, and 6.6% in securities issued
by FNMA.
Interest rate risk – This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed
rate investment resulting in changes in interest rates (the longer the period for
which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The City’s investment policies
specifically address the City’s desire to limit interest rate risk, but do not set
specific guidelines for measurement of this risk.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
50
Note 3 CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Beginning Ending
Balance Increases Decreases Balance
Governmental activities:
Capital assets not being depreciated:
Land 20,994,033$ 1,072,250$ -$ 22,066,283$
Easements 253,000 - - 253,000
Construction in progress 21,353,521 12,149,007 (21,326,256) 12,176,272
Total capital assets not being depreciated 42,600,554 13,221,257 (21,326,256) 34,495,555
Capital assets being depreciated:
Land improvements 23,145,607 1,348,784 - 24,494,391
Buildings and structures 64,004,570 22,516 - 64,027,086
Furniture and office equipment 4,185,783 12,689 - 4,198,472
Vehicles and equipment 16,224,482 1,832,893 (2,019,699) 16,037,676
Infrastructure 106,389,220 15,286,887 (1,070,323) 120,605,784
Parks 17,868,215 4,466,272 (24,621) 22,309,866
Total capital assets being depreciated 231,817,877 22,970,041 (3,114,643) 251,673,275
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Land improvements (16,760,052) (719,299) - (17,479,351)
Buildings and structures (20,187,680) (1,839,677) - (22,027,357)
Furniture and office equipment (3,036,030) (290,112) - (3,326,142)
Vehicles and equipment (11,468,144) (1,251,177) 2,019,699 (10,699,622)
Infrastructure (54,763,273) (3,428,048) 1,070,323 (57,120,998)
Parks (9,607,823) (932,851) 24,621 (10,516,053)
Total accumulated depreciation (115,823,002) (8,461,164) 3,114,643 (121,169,523)
Total capital assets being depreciated, net 115,994,875 14,508,877 - 130,503,752
Governmental activities capital assets, net 158,595,429$ 27,730,134$ (21,326,256)$ 164,999,307$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
51
Beginning Ending
Balance Increases Decreases Balance
Business-type activities:
Capital assets not being depreciated:
Land 285,341$ -$ -$ 285,341$
Construction in progress 19,217,587 10,286,595 (20,244,757) 9,259,425
Total capital assets not being depreciated 19,502,928 10,286,595 (20,244,757) 9,544,766
Capital assets being depreciated:
Land improvements & golf course 8,664,368 2,710,507 - 11,374,875
Buildings and structures 33,922,536 4,573,535 - 38,496,071
Furniture and office equipment 153,303 - - 153,303
Vehicles and equipment 11,740,591 934,120 (201,631) 12,473,080
Utility infrastructure 119,033,436 12,576,758 - 131,610,194
Lease property capital lease 430,614 - - 430,614
Total capital assets being depreciated 173,944,848 20,794,920 (201,631) 194,538,137
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Land improvements & golf course (5,718,819) (397,128) - (6,115,947)
Buildings and structures (13,772,507) (1,516,515) - (15,289,022)
Furniture and office equipment (146,253) (3,188) - (149,441)
Vehicles and equipment (5,169,275) (771,062) 201,631 (5,738,706)
Utility infrastructure (44,249,768) (3,998,646) - (48,248,414)
Lease property capital lease (430,614) - - (430,614)
Total accumulated depreciation (69,487,236) (6,686,539) 201,631 (75,972,144)
Total capital assets being depreciated, net 104,457,612 14,108,381 - 118,565,993
Business-type activities capital assets, net 123,960,540$ 24,394,976$ (20,244,757)$ 128,110,759$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
52
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the primary government as follows:
Governmental activities:
General government 499,311$
Public safety 1,025,422
Public works 4,698,112
Parks 2,238,319
Total depreciation expense - governmental activities 8,461,164$
Business-type activities:
Utilities 4,431,633$
Liquor 108,722
Aquatic Center 248,242
Golf Course 612,166
Arena 622,911
Art Center 23,929
Edinborough Park 180,549
Centennial Lakes 39,595
Sports Dome 418,792
Total depreciation expense - business-type activities 6,686,539$
CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS
At December 31, 2016, the City had construction project contracts in progress. The commitments
related to the remaining contract balances are summarized as follows:
Contract Remaining
Project # Project Description Amount Commitment
14-8 Eng Promenade Water Feature 1,445,573$ 63,074$
16-1 Eng Valley View & Tracy Neighborhood 2,114,765 124,714
16-3 Eng Strachauer Park Neighborhood 2,723,918 112,836
16-4 Eng Morningside A Neighborhood 2,762,768 262,004
NA Golf Course 5,349,958 4,342,937
4,905,565$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
53
Note 4 LONG-TERM DEBT
The City has five types of bonded debt outstanding at December 31, 2016: general obligation
bonds, permanent improvement revolving bonds, public project revenue bonds, Edina emerald
energy program revenue bonds and G.O. revenue bonds. The first type is payable from general
property taxes. The second type is payable solely from special assessments with any deficiency
to be provided for by general property taxes. The third type is payable solely from annual
appropriation lease payments received from the City of Edina pursuant to a lease between the
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City. The fourth type is payable solely from
special assessments. The fifth type is payable primarily from enterprise revenue with any
deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The reporting entity’s long-term debt is
segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be
repaid from business-type activities.
GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
As of December 31, 2016, the governmental long-term bonded debt of the financial reporting
entity consisted of the following:
Final
Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable
Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2016
General Obligation Bonds:
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2007A 4.00-4.25% 5/24/2007 2/1/2028 5,865,000$ 4,055,000$
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2009A 3.00-4.40% 4/29/2009 2/1/2030 14,000,000 10,710,000
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2010A 2.00-4.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2021 8,285,000 4,130,000
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2013A - Refunding 3.00-3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 5,710,000 4,850,000
General Obligation - 2014B - Refunding 3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2017 1,105,000 555,000
General Obligation - 2016A - Refunding 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2028 3,635,000 3,635,000
Total General Obligation Bonds 38,600,000 27,935,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds:
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2010B 2.00-3.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2022 2,305,000 1,435,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2011A 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2023 3,320,000 2,400,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2029 2,675,000 2,390,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A - Refunding 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2019 1,990,000 970,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2013A 3.00-3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 2,555,000 2,415,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2014B - Refunding 2.00-3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2020 4,075,000 3,330,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2015A 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2032 6,545,000 6,545,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2015A - Parking 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2036 2,495,000 2,495,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2016A 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2033 3,940,000 3,940,000
Total PIR Bonds 29,900,000 25,920,000
Public Project Revenue Bonds:
Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10-4.55% 11/24/2009 2/1/2030 2,595,000 1,645,000
Public Project Revenue, Series 2014A 2.00-3.625% 7/15/2014 2/1/2035 16,155,000 15,540,000
Public Project Revenue, Series 2015A - Refunding 2.50-3.00% 7/9/2015 5/1/2026 3,490,000 3,205,000
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 22,240,000 20,390,000
Edina Emerald Energy Program (EEEP) Revenue Bonds:
Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds, 2012A 7.00% 2/25/2012 1/1/2023 33,690 20,214
Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds, 2012B 5.50% 8/28/2012 1/1/2018 40,030 8,006
Total EEEP Bonds 73,720 28,220
Total bonded indebtedness - governmental activities 90,813,720$ 74,273,220$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
54
BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES
Final
Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable
Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2016
Revenue Bonds:
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B 2.00-3.00% 4/29/2009 1/1/2017 2,010,000$ 85,000$
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009C 2.00-4.00% 12/10/2009 2/1/2030 2,440,000 1,855,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B .45-1.60% 11/15/2012 2/1/2020 815,000 455,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00-3.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2033 2,100,000 2,100,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00-3.45% 10/10/2013 2/1/2029 1,125,000 1,010,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2015B 2.00-3.25% 7/9/2015 2/1/2031 2,140,000 2,140,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2022 11,230,000 7,060,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2023 6,100,000 4,535,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00-3.00% 7/15/2014 2/1/2024 5,680,000 4,590,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2017 1,830,000 935,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2019 5,710,000 4,370,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2025 5,235,000 4,710,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2027 8,775,000 8,775,000
Total bonded indebtedness - business-type activities 55,190,000$ 42,620,000$
Annual debt service requirements to maturity for the City’s bonds are as follows:
Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest
2017 6,260,000$ 887,981$ 2,105,000$ 745,783$ 905,000$ 633,628$
2018 1,995,000 727,074 2,480,000 672,088 1,045,000 607,198
2019 2,070,000 657,701 2,630,000 600,263 1,080,000 574,566
2020 2,145,000 584,731 2,470,000 533,775 1,115,000 540,690
2021 2,210,000 508,093 1,645,000 481,800 1,145,000 505,649
2022-2026 7,265,000 1,760,177 6,705,000 1,714,588 6,290,000 1,994,386
2027-2031 5,990,000 453,047 5,945,000 778,145 4,745,000 1,108,501
2032-2036 - - 1,940,000 102,831 4,065,000 298,488
Total 27,935,000$ 5,578,804$ 25,920,000$ 5,629,273$ 20,390,000$ 6,263,106$
Principal Interest Principal Interest
2017 -$ 928$ 5,540,000$ 1,148,081$
2018 11,375 1,517 5,400,000 986,201
2019 3,369 1,061 5,570,000 840,155
2020 3,369 825 4,170,000 706,603
2021 3,369 590 4,280,000 585,890
2022-2026 6,738 472 13,790,000 1,358,890
2027-2031 - - 3,515,000 251,602
2030-2033 - - 355,000 10,725
Total 28,220$ 5,393$ 42,620,000$ 5,888,147$
Bonds
Business-type Activities
Revenue
Year Ending
December 31
Year Ending
December 31
Governmental Activities
Edina Emerald Energy Program
Revenue Bonds
Governmental Activities
General Public Improvement
Obligation Bonds Revolving Bonds
Public Project
Revenue Bonds
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
55
CHANGE IN LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Long-term liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2016, was as follows:
Beginning Ending Due Within
Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year
Governmental activities:
Bonds payable:
General obligation 26,710,000$ 3,635,000$ (2,410,000)$ 27,935,000$ 6,260,000$
PIR 23,905,000 3,940,000 (1,925,000) 25,920,000 2,105,000
Public project revenue 21,290,000 - (900,000) 20,390,000 905,000
EEEP revenue 39,595 - (11,375) 28,220 -
Less deferred amounts:
Discount on bonds (433,708) (16,805) 44,917 (405,596) -
Premiums 1,829,890 450,409 (290,623) 1,989,676 -
Total bonds payable 73,340,777 8,008,604 (5,492,081) 75,857,300 9,270,000
Compensated absences 3,868,494 1,756,382 (1,594,276) 4,030,600 1,612,240
Governmental activity
Long-term liabilities 77,209,271$ 9,764,986$ (7,086,357)$ 79,887,900$ 10,882,240$
Business-type activities:
Bonds payable:
Revenue bonds 39,145,000$ 8,775,000$ (5,300,000)$ 42,620,000$ 5,540,000$
Less deferred amounts:
Discount on bonds (132,279) (19,467) 18,093 (133,653) -
Premiums 1,617,494 595,079 (331,233) 1,881,340 -
Total bonds payable 40,630,215 9,350,612 (5,613,140) 44,367,687 5,540,000
Compensated absences 858,414 280,738 (241,841) 897,311 358,925
Business-type activity
Long-term liabilities 41,488,629$ 9,631,350$ (5,854,981)$ 45,264,998$ 5,898,925$
For governmental activities, compensated absences are generally liquidated by the general
fund.
In 2016, the City issued $3,635,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2016A to finance a
crossover refunding of the 2018 through 2028 maturities of the City’s $5,865,000 General
Obligation capital improvement plan bonds, Series 2007A. Savings from the current proceeds
were placed in escrow and the General Obligation capital improvement plan bonds, Series
2007A were redeemed February 1, 2017. The crossover refunding was undertaken to reduce
total debt service payments by $565,794 and resulted in an economic gain of $512,801. The
City anticipates that ad valorem taxes will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this
issuance.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
56
REVENUE PLEDGED
Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows:
% of Total Remaining Principal Pledged
Debt Term of Principal and Interest Revenue
Bond Issue Use of Proceeds Type Service Pledge and Interest Paid Received
2009B Recreational Facility Bonds Pool improvement Pool 100% 2009-2017 86,275$ 83,750$ 956,068$
2009C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2010-2030 2,411,550 177,775 2,314,759
2012B Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2013-2020 467,119 131,249 2,314,759
2012C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2013-2033 2,679,503 53,794 2,314,759
2013B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf dome improvements Golf 100% 2014-2029 1,233,718 97,490 2,809,702
2015B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf course improvements Golf 100% 2016-2031 2,648,478 62,228 2,809,702
2011A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2012-2022 7,658,575 1,278,650 19,472,645
2012A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2013-2023 5,057,325 720,250 19,472,645
2014A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2014-2024 5,101,275 640,750 19,472,645
2014B Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2014-2019 5,518,525 2,427,675 19,472,645
2015A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2016-2025 5,414,550 671,913 19,472,645
2016A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2017-2027 10,231,254 - 19,472,645
Revenue Pledged Current Year
Note 5 LEGAL DEBT MARGIN
The City is subject to a statutory limitation by the State of Minnesota for bonded indebtedness
payable principally from property taxes. The City of Edina's legal debt margin for 2016 is
computed as follows:
December 31, 2016
Market Value (after fiscal disparities) 10,296,341,540$
Debt Limit (3% of Market Value) 308,890,246$
Amount of debt applicable to debt limit:
Total bonded debt 116,893,220$
Less:
Public improvement revolving bonds (25,920,000)
Revenue bonds (42,620,000)
EEEP revenue bonds (28,220)
Total debt applicable to debt limit 48,325,000$
Legal debt margin 260,565,246$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
57
Note 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE
The City participates in various pension plans, total pension expense for the year ended
December 31, 2016 was $8,238,891. The components of pension expense are noted in the
following plan summaries:
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
The City participates in the following cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit
pension plans administered by the PERA. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are
established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and
356. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401 (a)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
1. General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF)
All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City are covered by the General
Employees Retirement Fund (GERF). GERF members belong to either the
Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social
Security and Basic Plan members are not. The Basic Plan was closed to new members
in 1967. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan.
2. Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF)
The PEPFF, originally established for police officers and firefighters not covered by a
local relief association, now covers all police officers and firefighters hired since 1980.
Effective July 1, 1999, the PEPFF also covers police officers and firefighters belonging
to local relief associations that elected to merge with and transfer assets and
administration to the PERA.
B. BENEFITS PROVIDED
The PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are
established by state statute and can only be modified by the State Legislature.
Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Increases are related
to the funding ratio of the plan. Members in plans that are at least 90 percent funded for
two consecutive years are given 2.5 percent increases. Members in plans that have not
exceeded 90 percent funded, or have fallen below 80 percent, are given 1 percent
increases.
The benefit provisions stated in the following paragraphs of this section are current
provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are
entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at
the time they last terminated their public service.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
58
1. GERF Benefits
Benefits are based on a member’s highest average salary for any five successive years
of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods
are used to compute benefits for the PERA’s Coordinated and Basic Plan members.
The retiring member receives the higher of a step-rate benefit accrual formula (Method
1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for
a Basic Plan member is 2.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years of
service and 2.7 percent for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a
Coordinated Plan member is 1.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years
and 1.7 percent for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is
2.7 percent of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7 percent for Coordinated
Plan members for each year of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full
annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement
age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the
age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66.
2. PEPFF Benefits
Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2010, but before July 1, 2014,
vest on a prorated basis from 50 percent after five years up to 100 percent after 10
years of credited service. Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2014,
vest on a prorated basis from 50 percent after 10 years up to 100 percent after 20
years of credited service. The annuity accrual rate is 3 percent of average salary for
each year of service. For PEPFF members who were first hired prior to July 1, 1989, a
full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal at least 90.
C. CONTRIBUTIONS
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions.
Contribution rates can only be modified by the State Legislature.
1. GERF Contributions
Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 6.50 percent of their annual
covered salary in calendar year 2016. The City was required to contribute 7.50
percent for Coordinated Plan members in calendar year 2016. The City’s
contributions to the GERF for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $1,265,817.
The City’s contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state
statute.
2. PEPFF Contributions
Plan members were required to contribute 10.8 percent of their annual covered salary
in calendar year 2016. The City was required to contribute 16.20 percent of pay for
PEPFF members in calendar year 2016. The City’s regular contributions to the PEPFF
for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $1,272,485. The City’s contributions were
equal to the required contributions as set by state statute.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
59
D. PENSION COSTS
1. GERF Pension Costs
At December 31, 2016, the City reported a liability of $21,349,748 for its
proportionate share of the GERF’s net pension liability. The City’s net pension liability
reflected a reduction due to the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $6 million to the
fund in 2016. The State of Minnesota is considered a non-employer contribution
entity and the State’s contribution meets the definition of a special funding situation.
The State of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net pension liability associated
with the City totaled $278,868. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30,
2016, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was
determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportion of the net
pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by the PERA during
the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2015 through
June 30, 2016, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the
PERA’s participating employers. At June 30, 2016, the City’s proportionate share was
.2656 percent, which was a decrease of .0027 percent from its proportion measured
as of June 30, 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the City recognized pension expense of
$2,778,376 for its proportionate share of the GERF’s pension expense. In addition, the
City recognized an additional $83,072 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its
proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $6 million to the General
Employees Fund.
At December 31, 2016, the City reported its proportionate share of the GERF’s
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources, and its contributions
subsequent to the measurement date, related to pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Deferred
Outflows Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience –$ 1,739,007$
Changes in actuarial assumptions 4,180,300 –
Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 4,062,111 –
Changes in proportion – 773,571
Contributions paid to the PERA subsequent to the measurement
date 676,778 –
Total 8,919,189$ 2,512,578$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
60
$676,778 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from
city contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a
reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2017. Other
amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions
will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Pension
Year Ended Expense
December 31, Amount
2017 1,464,160$
2018 1,464,155$
2019 2,030,339$
2020 771,179$
2. PEPFF Pension Costs
At December 31, 2016, the City reported a liability of $32,065,260 for its proportionate
share of the PEPFF’s net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as
of June 30, 2016, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability
was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportion of the
net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by the PERA during
the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2015 through
June 30, 2016, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the
PERA’s participating employers. At June 30, 2016, the City’s proportion was
.799 percent, which was a decrease of .008 percent from its proportion measured as
of June 30, 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the City recognized pension expense of
$5,460,515 for its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s pension expense. The City also
recognized $71,910 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as pension expense (and
grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the state of Minnesota’s on-behalf
contributions to the PEPFF. Legislation passed in 2013 required the state of Minnesota
to begin contributing $9 million to the PEPFF each year, starting in fiscal year 2014.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
61
At December 31, 2016, the City reported its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions
from the following sources:
Deferred Deferred
Outflows Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience –$ 3,690,284$
Changes in actuarial assumptions 17,646,912 –
Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 4,905,267 –
Changes in proportion – 104,549
Contributions paid to the PERA subsequent to the measurement
date 691,880 –
Total 23,244,059$ 3,794,833$
$691,880 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from
city contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a
reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2017. Other
amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions
will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Pension
Year Ended Expense
December 31, Amount
2017 4,035,655$
2018 4,035,655$
2019 4,035,674$
2020 3,636,253$
2021 3,014,109$
E. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
The total pension liability in the June 30, 2016 actuarial valuation was determined using
the following actuarial assumptions:
Inflation 2.50% per year
Active member payroll growth 3.25% per year
Investment rate of return 7.50%
Salary increases were based on a service-related table. Mortality rates for active members,
retirees, survivors, and disabilitants were based on RP-2014 tables for GERF and RP-2000
tables for PEPFF for males or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments. Cost of
living benefit increases for retirees are assumed to be 1.0 percent for all future years for
GERF and PEPFF.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
62
Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2016, valuation were based on the results of
actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience study in the GERF was
completed in 2015. The experience study for the PEPFF was for the period July 1, 2004
through June 30, 2009.
The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2016:
GERF
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent
per year through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.0 percent per year
for all future years.
The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9 percent to 7.5 percent. The
single discount rate was changed from 7.9 percent to 7.5 percent.
Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June
30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were
decreased by .25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.5 percent for
inflation.
PEPFF
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent
per year through 2037 and 2.5 percent thereafter to 1.0 percent per year for all
future years.
The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9 percent to 7.5 percent. The
single discount rate was changed from 7.9 percent to 5.6 percent.
The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased
by .25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.5 percent for inflation.
The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of the PERA, prepares an
analysis of the reasonableness of the long-term expected rate of return on a regular basis
using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of
return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce
an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the
target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of arithmetic
real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table:
Asset Class
Target
Allocation
Long-Term Expected
Real Rate of Return
Domestic stocks 45% 5.50%
International
stocks
15% 6.00%
Bonds 18% 1.45%
Alternative assets 20% 6.40%
Cash 2% 0.50%
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
63
F. DISCOUNT RATE
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2016 was 7.5 percent, a
reduction from the 7.9 percent used in 2015. The projection of cash flows used to determine
the discount rate assumed that contributions from Plan members and employers will be made
at rates set in Minnesota Statutes. Based on those assumptions, the fiduciary net position of
the GERF was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current
Plan members. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments
was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.
In the PEPFF, the fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected
future benefit payments of current plan members through June 30, 2056. Beginning in fiscal
years ended June 30, 2057 for the PEPFF, when projected benefit payments exceed the funds’
projected fiduciary net position, benefit payments were discounted at the municipal bond rate
of 2.85 percent based on an index of 20-year general obligation bonds with an average AA
credit rating at the measurement date. An equivalent single discount rate of 5.6 percent for the
PEPFF was determined that produced approximately the same present value of projected
benefits when applied to all years of projected benefits as the present value of projected
benefits using 7.5 percent applied to all years of projected benefits through the point of asset
depletion and 2.85 percent after.
G. PENSION LIABILITY SENSITIVITY
The following presents the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for all plans it
participates in, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well
as what the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated
using a discount rate 1.0 percentage point lower or 1.0 percentage point higher than the current
discount rate:
1% Decrease in 1% Increase in
Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate
(6.5%) (7.5%) (8.5%)
The City’s proportionate share of the
GERF net pension liability 30,322,970$ 21,349,748$ 13,958,257$
1% Decrease in 1% Increase in
Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate
(4.6%) (5.6%) (6.6%)
The City’s proportionate share of the
PEPFF net pension liability 44,815,199$ 32,065,260$ 21,516,926$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
64
H. PENSION PLAN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in a
separately-issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required
supplementary information. That report may be obtained on the PERA website at
www.mnpera.org.
I. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN (DCP)
Board members of the City are covered by the DCP, a multiple-employer deferred
compensation plan administered by PERA. The DCP is a tax qualified plan under Section
401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and all contributions by or on behalf of employees are tax
deferred until time of withdrawal.
Plan benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings, less
administrative expenses. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03, specifies plan provisions,
including the employee and employer contribution rates for those qualified personnel who elect
to participate. An eligible elected official who decides to participate contributes 5.0 percent of
salary which is matched by the elected official’s employer. For ambulance service personnel,
employer contributions are determined by the employer, and for salaried employees must be a
fixed percentage of salary. Employer contributions for volunteer personnel may be a unit value
for each call or period of alert duty. Employees who are paid for their services may elect to
make member contributions in an amount not to exceed the employer share. Employer and
employee contributions are combined and used to purchase shares in one or more of the seven
accounts of the Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund. For administering the plan, PERA
receives 2.0 percent of employer contributions and twenty-five hundredths of 1.0 percent
(.0025) of the assets in each member’s account annually.
Total contributions made by the City during fiscal year 2016 were:
Employee Employer Employee Employer Required Rate
1,749$ 1,749$ 5% 5% 5%
Contribution Amount Percentage of Covered Payroll
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
65
Note 7 OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
The City provides post-employment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees
through City’s Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan, a single-employer defined benefit
plan administered by the City. All post-employment benefits are based on contractual
agreements with employee groups. These contractual agreements do not include any
specific contribution or funding requirements. The plan does not issue a publically available
financial report. These benefits are summarized as follows:
Post-Employment Insurance Benefits – All retirees of the City have the option
under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the City from
the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare.
For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full premium to
continue coverage for medical and dental insurance.
The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health
insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether
the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree. Consequently, participating
retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an “implicit rate
subsidy.” This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more
favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing
insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the City’s
younger and statistically healthier active employees.
B. FUNDING POLICY
The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements,
with additional amounts to pre-fund benefits as determined annually by the City. Historically
the City has chosen pay-as-you-go financing for OPEB, generally this liability is liquidated
by all funds that employ full-time employees on a pro-rata basis.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
66
C. ANNUAL OPEB COST AND NET OPEB OBLIGATION
The City’s annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on annual required
contributions (ARC) of the City, an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis
in accordance with the parameters of codification Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The ARC
represents a level funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal
costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a
period not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the City’s
annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the
changes in the City’s net OPEB obligation to the plan:
Annual required contribution 275,534$
Interest on net OPEB obligation 86,813
Adjustment to annual required contribution (75,311)
Annual OPEB cost (expense) 287,036
Contributions made (61,922)
Increase in net OPEB obligation 225,114
Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year 1,929,174
Net OPEB obligation - end of year 2,154,288$
The City’s annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan,
and the net OPEB obligation for the past three years are as follows:
Percentage of
Fiscal Annual Employer Annual OPEB Net OPEB
Year Ended OPEB Cost Contribution Cost Contributed Obligation
December 31, 2014 318,242$ 86,445$ 27.2% 1,719,772$
December 31, 2015 329,182 119,780 36.4% 1,929,174
December 31, 2016 287,036 61,922 21.6% 2,154,288
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
67
D. FUNDED STATUS AND FUNDING PROGRESS
As of January 1, 2016, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan was zero percent
funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $2,546,522, and the actuarial value
of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $2,546,522.
The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was
$21,590,000, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 12.0 percent.
Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts
and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. Examples
include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend.
Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and ARCs of the employer
are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and
new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule of Funding Progress immediately
following the notes to the basic financial statements presents multi-year trend information
about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time
relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits.
E. ACTUARIAL METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan
(the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of
benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of
benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods
and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-
term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent
with the long-term perspective of the calculations.
In the January 1, 2016 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method
was used. The actuarial assumptions included: a 4.5 percent investment rate of return (net
of administrative expenses) based on the City’s own investments; a payroll growth rate of
3.5 percent, and an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 9.0 percent initially, reduced by
decrements to an ultimate rate of 5.0 percent after twelve years. The UAAL is being
amortized as a level percentage of payroll. The remaining amortization period at January
1, 2016 was 30 years on an “open” basis.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
68
Note 8 INTERFUND RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES, AND TRANSFERS
The composition of due from other funds and due to other funds account balances as of
December 31, 2016, is as follows:
Payable Fund Amount
General Risk Management Internal Service 26,597$
Construction Nonmajor - Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 443,935
Nonmajor - Sports Dome Arena 44,719
Total 515,251$
Receivable Fund
The City’s interfund receivable and payable eliminates what would have been a negative cash
balance.
Debt Nonmajor
General Service Construction Golf Course Arena Enterprise Total
Transfer out:
General Fund -$ -$ 804,542$ -$ -$ -$ 804,542$
Construction Fund - 2,400,000 - - 9,861 173,716 2,583,577
Nonmajor Governmental - - - - - 16,850 16,850
Utilities Fund - - 100,000 - - - 100,000
Liquor Fund 100,000 - 100,000 150,000 200,000 150,000 700,000
100,000$ 2,400,000$ 1,004,542$ 150,000$ 209,861$ 340,566$ 4,204,969$
Transfer In:
Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit
from services provided by another fund. Some of the City’s interfund transfers fall under that
category. Non-routine transfers include the following:
1. The liquor fund transferred $100,000, $150,000, $200,000, $100,000 and $50,000 to the
general, golf course, arena, art center, and centennial lakes funds, respectively, to
subsidize operations.
2. The construction fund transferred $9,861, $25,837 and $23,210 to the arena,
edinborough park and centennial lakes funds, respectively, to subsidize capital
improvements to those facilities.
3. The environmental efficiency fund transferred $16,850 to the art center fund to subsidize
capital improvements.
4. The construction fund transferred $124,669 to the sports dome fund to reimburse for debt
proceeds initially received in the construction fund for capital projects at that facility.
5. The utilities fund and liquor fund transferred $100,000 each to the construction fund to
fund the capital improvement program, as planned in the 2016 budget.
6. The general fund transferred $64,542 of the 2015 unassigned fund balance to the
construction fund to subsidize the capital improvement program.
7. The general fund transferred $740,000 to the construction fund for use of park reserves
from the parkland dedication money received in 2016.
8. The construction fund transferred $2,400,000 of PIR assessment revenue to the debt
service fund for related debt payments.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
69
Note 9 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
The Housing Redevelopment Authority and City of Edina are the administering authorities for the
following Tax Increment Districts:
District number 1208 (Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District) is an economic development
district established in 2012 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2022.
District number 1211 (Pentagon Park Increment Financing District) is an economic development
district established in 2014 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2043.
District number 1212 (Grandview 2 Increment Financing District) is an economic development
district established in 2016 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2045.
District number 1214 (66 West Increment Financing District) is an economic development district
established in 2016 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2045.
The following table reflects values as of December 31, 2016:
TIF #1208 TIF #1211 TIF #1212 TIF #1214 Total
Original tax capacity 8,746,251$ 880,068$ 42,662$ 25,525$ 9,694,506$
Current tax capacity 13,303,761 813,186 42,662 25,525 14,185,134
Fiscal Disparities 1,083,413 40,648 - - 1,124,061
Tax capacity change 3,474,097 (107,530) - - 3,366,567
Captured tax capacity value:
Retained captured tax capacity 3,474,097$ (107,530)$ -$ -$ 3,366,567$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
70
Note 10 CONTINGENCIES
A. RISK MANAGEMENT
The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to and
destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters.
Worker’s compensation insurance was provided through the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust. There is no deductible. The City has an annual deposit premium that is
subject to adjustment based on the actual audited payroll.
A package policy; including property, general liability, and automobile coverage, is
provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Under this policy, the
City pays an annual premium and had a $50,000 per occurrence deductible and is
subject to an annual aggregate deductible of $100,000, with a $1,500,000 per occurrence
maximum.
Liquor liability coverage is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage and has a $1,000,000 annual
maximum.
Settlement claims have not exceeded insurance coverage for each of the past three
years. There were no significant decreases in insurance coverage during 2016.
B. LITIGATION
The City attorney has indicated that existing and pending lawsuits, claims and other
actions in which the City is a defendant are either covered by insurance; of an immaterial
amount; or, in the judgment of the City attorney, remotely recoverable by plaintiffs.
C. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS
The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in
the form of grants. The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally
requires compliance with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreements and
is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any disallowed claims resulting from such
audits could become a liability of the applicable fund. However, in the opinion of
management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the
financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial
position of the City at December 31, 2016.
D. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
The City’s tax increment districts are subject to review by the State of Minnesota Office of
the State Auditor (OSA). Any disallowed claims or misuse of tax increments could
become a liability of the applicable fund. Management is not aware of any instances of
noncompliance which would have a material effect on the financial statements.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
71
Note 11 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATION
As of December 31, 2016, the City of Edina had four series of Housing and Health Care Revenue
Bonds, with an aggregate principal amount payable of $29,100,000. The bonds are payable
solely from revenues of the respective organizations and do not constitute an indebtedness of the
City, and are not a charge against its general credit or taxing power. Accordingly, the bonds are
not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements.
Note 12 JOINT VENTURE
The City is a participant with the City of Bloomington, the City of Eden Prairie and the
Metropolitan Airport Commission in a joint venture to construct and operate a facility to be used
for the training of law enforcement officers and firefighters. The South Metro Public Safety
Training Facility Association (PSTF) is governed by a Board consisting of one representative from
each Member. On dissolution of the Association, the Facility shall revert to the City of Edina, and
all remaining assets shall be divided among the members based on the Cost Sharing Formula. In
accordance with the joint venture agreement, each member of the association will share in the
cost of the construction and operation based on the Cost Sharing Formula. The City’s equity
interest in the capital assets of the PSTF was $1,770,353. Complete financial statements for
PSTF can be obtained from the City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424.
Note 13 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The City pays an annual membership fee to the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility as
part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the Police and Fire
departments and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2016,
the City paid a total of $58,848 in membership fees and $185,888 for the classroom expansion
project to the PSTF.
The City also pays an annual membership fee to the I-494 Corridor Commission as part of the
joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the commissions and projects
department and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2016,
the City paid a total of $16,084 in membership fees to the I-494 Corridor Commission.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2016
72
Note 14 FUND BALANCES
A. Classifications
At December 31, 2016, a summary of the City’s governmental fund balance classifications
are as follows:
General Fund HRA Fund
Debt Service
Fund
Construction
Fund
Nonmajor
Funds Total
Nonspendable
Prepaid items 27,643$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 27,643$
Restricted
Park dedication 927,673 - - - - 927,673
Tax increments - 9,799,747 - - - 9,799,747
Affordable housing - 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000
Debt service - - 11,187,468 - - 11,187,468
Energy efficiency projects - - - - 209,510 209,510
Forfeitures - - - - 456,273 456,273
Grant funds - - - - 85,592 85,592
Arts and culture - - - - 9,555 9,555
Donations - - - - 148,083 148,083
Conservation and sustainability initiatives - - - - 174,745 174,745
Total Restricted 927,673 11,799,747 11,187,468 - 1,083,758 24,998,646
Assigned
Compensated absences 1,612,240 - - - - 1,612,240
Construction commitments - - - 562,628 - 562,628
Special projects - - - 2,062,336 - 2,062,336
Equipment - - - 2,988,791 - 2,988,791
PIR - - - 3,060,653 - 3,060,653
Construction - - - 4,435,030 - 4,435,030
Total Assigned 1,612,240 - - 13,109,438 - 14,721,678
Unassigned 14,624,755 - - - (190,845) 14,433,910
Total Fund Balance 17,192,311$ 11,799,747$ 11,187,468$ 13,109,438$ 892,913$ 54,181,877$
B. Unassigned Fund Balance Policy
The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for
unassigned fund balance for the general fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned
general fund balance of 42%-47% of the subsequent year’s budgeted property tax revenue.
As of December 31, 2016, the City has $14,624,755 of unassigned fund balance in the
general fund, or 54.4% of 2017 budgeted property tax revenue. This amount is $2,000,405
above the goal range identified in the policy.
C. Deficit Fund Equity
The following funds had deficit fund balance/net position at December 31, 2016:
Nonmajor Governmental Funds:
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (190,845)$
Nonmajor Proprietary Funds:
Art Center (5,551)
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Revenues:
Taxes:
General property taxes 25,023,952$ 25,023,952$ 24,681,406$ (342,546)$
Franchise taxes 810,000 810,000 870,690 60,690
Lodging tax - - 22,624 22,624
Total taxes 25,833,952 25,833,952 25,574,720 (259,232)
Licenses and permits: 4,023,160 4,023,160 5,192,934 1,169,774
Intergovernmental:
Federal: 56,000 56,000 61,783 5,783
State:
Municipal state aid 195,000 195,000 195,000 -
Other 126,000 126,000 212,249 86,249
State aid - police 320,000 320,000 396,903 76,903
State aid - fire 375,573 375,573 414,097 38,524
Health programs 118,977 118,977 118,948 (29)
Total intergovernmental 1,191,550 1,191,550 1,398,980 207,430
Charges for services:
Administration 85,000 85,000 107,397 22,397
Communications & Technology 131,246 131,246 156,825 25,579
Finance 499,128 499,128 473,076 (26,052)
Public Works 170,000 170,000 51,481 (118,519)
Engineering 225,400 225,400 369,521 144,121
Police 321,706 321,706 614,343 292,637
Fire 2,122,125 2,122,125 2,103,732 (18,393)
Parks & Recreation 280,405 280,405 495,472 215,067
Community Development 105,300 105,300 78,047 (27,253)
Total charges for services 3,940,310 3,940,310 4,449,894 509,584
Fines and forfeits 975,000 975,000 946,199 (28,801)
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 120,000 120,000 125,095 5,095
Rental of property 470,300 470,300 514,955 44,655
Parkland dedication - - 1,250,000 1,250,000
Other 7,600 7,600 127,496 119,896
Total miscellaneous 597,900 597,900 2,017,546 1,419,646
Total revenues 36,561,872 36,561,872 39,580,273 3,018,401
Budgeted Amounts
73
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Expenditures:
General government:
Administration:
Personal services 958,905$ 958,905$ 989,704$ 30,799$
Contractual services 743,429 743,429 768,101 24,672
Commodities 96,100 96,100 60,757 (35,343)
Central services 98,376 98,376 97,066 (1,310)
Total administration 1,896,810 1,896,810 1,915,628 18,818
Communications & technology:
Personal services 682,806 682,806 705,733 22,927
Contractual services 224,700 224,700 223,088 (1,612)
Commodities 85,500 85,500 68,891 (16,609)
Central services 111,612 111,612 108,967 (2,645)
Total communications & technology 1,104,618 1,104,618 1,106,679 2,061
Human Resources:
Personal services 725,553 725,553 755,045 29,492
Contractual services 37,200 37,200 12,549 (24,651)
Commodities 2,500 2,500 1,643 (857)
Central services 25,092 25,092 23,958 (1,134)
Total human resources 790,345 790,345 793,195 2,850
Finance:
Personal services 528,028 528,028 513,113 (14,915)
Contractual services 242,900 242,900 229,027 (13,873)
Commodities 14,000 14,000 12,908 (1,092)
Central services 48,696 48,696 47,744 (952)
Total finance 833,624 833,624 802,792 (30,832)
Community development:
Personal services 1,284,929 1,284,929 1,285,908 979
Contractual services 237,200 237,200 130,941 (106,259)
Commodities 6,700 6,700 5,003 (1,697)
Central services 118,116 118,116 115,115 (3,001)
Total community development 1,646,945 1,646,945 1,536,967 (109,978)
Total general government 6,272,342 6,272,342 6,155,261 (117,081)
Public safety:
Police:
Personal services 8,680,196 8,680,196 8,553,869 (126,327)
Contractual services 1,071,175 1,071,175 967,678 (103,497)
Commodities 94,715 94,715 130,201 35,486
Central services 1,199,460 1,199,460 1,147,066 (52,394)
Total police 11,045,546 11,045,546 10,798,814 (246,732)
Fire:
Personal services 6,119,773 6,119,773 6,319,829 200,056
Contractual services 555,300 555,300 501,131 (54,169)
Commodities 233,900 233,900 270,729 36,829
Central services 548,280 548,280 518,148 (30,132)
Total fire 7,457,253 7,457,253 7,609,837 152,584
Total public safety 18,502,799 18,502,799 18,408,651 (94,148)
Budgeted Amounts
74
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Budgeted Amounts
Public works:
Public works:
Personal services 4,529,113$ 4,529,113$ 4,481,131$ (47,982)$
Contractual services 1,375,600 1,375,600 1,170,335 (205,265)
Commodities 1,438,175 1,438,175 1,373,190 (64,985)
Central services 1,583,712 1,583,712 1,440,133 (143,579)
Total public works 8,926,600 8,926,600 8,464,789 (461,811)
Engineering:
Personal services 1,324,261 1,324,261 1,244,882 (79,379)
Contractual services 116,500 116,500 91,552 (24,948)
Commodities 25,000 25,000 21,501 (3,499)
Central services 119,448 119,448 111,770 (7,678)
Total engineering 1,585,209 1,585,209 1,469,705 (115,504)
Total public works 10,511,809 10,511,809 9,934,494 (577,315)
Parks:
Parks & recreation:
Personal services 963,814 963,814 978,670 14,856
Contractual services 254,022 254,022 349,132 95,110
Commodities 86,250 86,250 108,409 22,159
Central services 70,836 70,836 69,186 (1,650)
Total parks & recreation 1,374,922 1,374,922 1,505,397 130,475
Total parks 1,374,922 1,374,922 1,505,397 130,475
Total expenditures 36,661,872 36,661,872 36,003,803 (658,069)
Revenues over (under) expenditures (100,000) (100,000) 3,576,470 3,676,470
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfer from other funds 100,000 100,000 100,000 -
Transfer to other funds - (804,542) (804,542) -
Total financing sources (uses) 100,000 (704,542) (704,542) -
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance -$ (804,542)$ 2,871,928 3,676,470$
Fund balance - January 1 14,320,383
Fund balance - December 31 17,192,311$
75
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA) FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Tax increment collections 2,500,000$ 2,500,000$ 2,779,097$ 279,097$
Intergovernmental - - 50,000 50,000
Investment income 77,000 77,000 82,091 5,091
Charges for services 50,000 50,000 31,094 (18,906)
Other revenues - - 2,000,000 2,000,000
Total revenues 2,627,000 2,627,000 4,942,282 2,315,282
Expenditures:
Personal services 123,970 123,970 126,432 2,462
Contractual services 655,865 655,865 385,699 (270,166)
Commodities 1,000 1,000 340 (660)
Capital outlay 4,000,000 4,000,000 652,024 (3,347,976)
Total expenditures 4,780,835 4,780,835 1,164,495 (3,616,340)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (2,153,835)$ (2,153,835)$ 3,777,787 5,931,622$
Fund balance - January 1 8,021,960
Fund balance - December 31 11,799,747$
Budgeted Amounts
76
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN
SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Unfunded Unfunded
Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability as a
Valuation Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered Percentage of
Date Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll Payroll
January 1, 2012 2,959,876$ -$ 2,959,876$ 0.0% 18,220,189$ 16.2%
January 1, 2014 3,026,848$ -$ 3,026,848$ 0.0% 20,305,179$ 14.9%
January 1, 2016 2,546,522$ -$ 2,546,522$ 0.0% 21,590,000$ 11.8%
77
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
12/31/2015 6/30/2015 0.2683% 13,765,652$ -$ 13,765,652$ 15,508,173$ 88.76% 78.20%
12/31/2016 6/30/2016 0.2656% 21,349,748 278,868 21,628,616 16,481,973 131.23% 68.91%
12/31/2015 1,248,845$ 1,248,845$ -$ 16,651,267$ 7.50%
12/31/2016 1,265,817 1,265,817 - 16,877,560 7.50%
Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2030
and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit
increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2035 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The assumed investment
return was changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. The single discount rate was changed from 7.90 percent to 7.50 percent. Other assumptions were changed pursuant to
the experience study dated June 30, 2015. The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and
2.50 percent for inflation.
Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. On January 1, 2015, the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged in the GERF, which increased the total pension liability by
$1.1 billion and increased the fiduciary plan net position to $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and employer contributions were revised.
Note 3: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10-year trend information.
Additional years will be added as they become available.
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
PERA Fiscal
Year End Date
(Measurement
Date)
City's Covered
Payroll
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
Statutorily
Required
Contributions
Contribution
Deficiency
(Excess)
City's
Proportion of
the Net
Pension
Liability
City's
Proportionate
Share of the
Net Pension
Liability
Contributions
in Relation to
the Statutorily
Required
Contributions
Schedule of City Contributions
State's
Proportionate
Share of the
Net Pension
Liability
Associated
with the City
City's Proportionate Share
of the Net Pension Liability
and the State's
Proportionate Share of the
Net Pension Liability
Associated with the City
City's
Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability
as a Percentage
of Covered
Payroll
Plan Fiduciary
Net Position
as a
Percentage of
the total
Pension
Liability
Schedule of City's and Non-Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
Covered
Payroll
Contributions as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll
78
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
12/31/2015 6/30/2015 0.8070% 9,169,408$ 7,797,803$ 117.59% 86.60%
12/31/2016 6/30/2016 0.7990% 32,065,260 7,699,821 416.44% 63.88%
12/31/2015 1,268,476$ 1,268,476$ -$ 7,830,099$ 16.20%
12/31/2016 1,272,485 1,272,485 - 7,854,846 16.20%
Note 1: Changes in Plan Provisions. The post-retirement benefit increase to be paid after attainment of the 90.0 percent funding threshold
was changed, from inflation up to 2.5 percent, to a fixed rate of 2.5 percent.
Note 3: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended
to present 10-year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available.
Schedule of City Contributions
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
Statutorily
Required
Contributions
Contributions
in Relation to
the Statutorily
Required
Contributions
Contribution
Deficiency
(Excess)
Covered
Payroll
Contributions as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll
Note 2: Changes in Actuarial Assumptions. (1) 2015 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from
1.00 percent per year through 2030 and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year through 2037 and 2.50 percent per year
thereafter. (2) 2016 Changes - The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.00 percent per year through 2037
and 2.50 percent per year thereafter to 1.00 percent per year for all future years. The assumed investment return was changed from 7.90
percent to 7.50 percent. The single discount rate was changed from 7.90 percent to 5.60 percent. The assumed future salary increases,
payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25 percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.50 percent for inflation.
Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
PERA Fiscal
Year End Date
(Measurement
Date)
City's
Proportion of
the Net
Pension
Liability
City's
Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability
City's Covered
Payroll
City's Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll
Plan Fiduciary Net
Position as a
Percentage of the
total Pension Liability
79
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
December 31, 2016
80
Note A LEGAL COMPLIANCE – BUDGETS
The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the preceding
schedules:
1. The City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year
commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures
and the means of financing them.
2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments.
3. The budget is legally enacted by the passage of a resolution by the City Council.
4. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year.
5. Budgets for all governmental funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
6. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by Council-approved
supplemental appropriations and budget transfers.
7. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department in the General Fund
unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year-end.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
December 31, 2016
81
Note B EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS
The General Fund is legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department
level for the General Fund. The following is a listing of General Fund departments whose
expenditures exceed budget appropriations.
Final Over
Budget Actual Budget
General Fund
General Government
Administration 1,896,810$ 1,915,628$ 18,818$
Communications & technology 1,104,618 1,106,679 2,061
Human resources 790,345 793,195 2,850
Public Safety
Fire 7,457,253 7,609,837 152,584
Parks
Parks & recreation 1,374,922 1,505,397 130,475
Excess expenditures in the General Fund fire department are due to an increase in salaries primarily
related to more overtime worked and higher healthcare expenses than anticipated.
Excess expenditures in the General Fund parks and recreation department are due to increased
programming expenses that resulted in additional revenue.
The remaining governmental funds budgets are legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is
at the fund level for these funds. The following is a listing of funds whose expenditures exceed budget
appropriations.
Final Over
Budget Actual Budget
Debt Service Fund 7,552,545$ 7,607,202$ 54,657$
Construction Fund 12,078,243 14,187,148 2,108,905
PACS Fund 1,252,566 2,337,868 1,085,302
Police SR Fund 174,000 181,489 7,489
Braemar Memorial Fund - 1,638 1,638
Environmental Efficiency Fund 104,000 143,508 39,508
Excess expenditures in the construction fund are the result of unbudgeted projects, with expenditures
offset by alternative funding sources such as intergovernmental funding and state aid maintenance.
Excess expenditures in the PACS and environmental efficiency funds are due to project costs being
higher than anticipated.
82
This page left blank intentionally.
A Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue
sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes.
The following are nonmajor special revenue funds:
Community Development Block Grant Fund - This fund was established to
account for funds received under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974.
Police Special Revenue Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
received for specific purposes within the police department, including
E-911 and forfeiture funds.
Braemar Memorial Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing the Braemar golf course
with equipment and amenities that might not otherwise be affordable or viewed
as a necessity to the golf course.
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund - This fund was established to account for
funds received from gas and electric franchise fees to be used for pedestrian
and cyclist improvements included in future street reconstruction projects.
Arts and Culture Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing public arts and culture related
activities.
Conservation and Sustainability Fund - This fund was established to account for
funds received from gas and electric franchise fees to be used for initiatives
focused on conservation and sustainability.
A Capital Project Fund is used to account for and report financial resources
used for the acquisition of capital assets.
The following is a nonmajor capital project fund:
Environmental Efficiency Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
received through energy cost savings to be reinvested in future energy efficiencies.
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds
Capital Project Funds
83
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Capital
Projects
Community Police Pedestrian Conservation Total Nonmajor
Development Special Braemar and Cyclist Arts and and Environmental Governmental
Block Grant Revenue Memorial Safety Culture Sustainability Efficiency Funds
Assets
Cash and investments -$ 537,773$ 147,373$ -$ 9,592$ 115,578$ 220,519$ 1,030,835$
Accrued interest - - 430 2,049 17 215 830 3,541
Accounts receivable - 525 280 292,628 - 60,861 - 354,294
Due from other governments - 9,338 - - 127 - - 9,465
Total assets -$ 547,636$ 148,083$ 294,677$ 9,736$ 176,654$ 221,349$ 1,398,135$
Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of
Resources, and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable -$ 5,771$ -$ 580$ 54$ -$ -$ 6,405$
Salaries payable - - - 2,278 - 1,909 - 4,187
Contracts payable - - - 38,729 - - 11,839 50,568
Due to other funds - - - 443,935 - - 443,935
Total liabilities - 5,771 - 485,522 54 1,909 11,839 505,095
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue - taxes - - - - 127 - - 127
Fund balance (deficits):
Restricted - 541,865 148,083 - 9,555 174,745 209,510 1,083,758
Unassigned - - - (190,845) - - - (190,845)
Total fund balance (deficits) - 541,865 148,083 (190,845) 9,555 174,745 209,510 892,913
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources,
and fund balance -$ 547,636$ 148,083$ 294,677$ 9,736$ 176,654$ 221,349$ 1,398,135$
Special Revenue
84
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Capital
Projects
Community Police Pedestrian Conservation Total Nonmajor
Development Special Braemar and Cyclist Arts and and Environmental Governmental
Block Grant Revenue Memorial Safety Culture Sustainability Efficiency Funds
Revenues:
General property taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$
Franchise taxes - - - 1,173,187 - 202,619 - 1,375,806
Intergovernmental 95,975 15,000 - 209,307 - - 41,197 361,479
Fines and forfeitures - 70,618 - - - - - 70,618
Investment income - 22 1,008 6,111 57 825 - 8,023
Other revenues - 112,061 6,485 45,250 2,876 450 - 167,122
Total revenues 95,975 197,701 7,493 1,433,855 22,933 203,894 41,197 2,003,048
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 95,975 - - - - 29,149 - 125,124
Public safety - 131,882 - - - - - 131,882
Public works - - - 131,878 - - - 131,878
Parks - - 243 - 16,126 - - 16,369
Capital Outlay:
Public safety - 49,607 - - - - - 49,607
Public works - - - 2,205,990 - - 113,871 2,319,861
Parks - - 1,395 - - - 29,637 31,032
Total expenditures 95,975 181,489 1,638 2,337,868 16,126 29,149 143,508 2,805,753
Revenues over (under)
expenditures - 16,212 5,855 (904,013) 6,807 174,745 (102,311) (802,705)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers out - - - - - - (16,850) (16,850)
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance - 16,212 5,855 (904,013) 6,807 174,745 (119,161) (819,555)
Fund balance -
January 1 - 525,653 142,228 713,168 2,748 - 328,671 1,712,468
Fund balance (deficits) -
December 31 -$ 541,865$ 148,083$ (190,845)$ 9,555$ 174,745$ 209,510$ 892,913$
Special Revenue
85
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Intergovernmental 125,000$ 125,000$ 95,975$ (29,025)$
Expenditures:
Current:
Contractual services 125,000 125,000 95,975 (29,025)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance -$ -$ - -$
Fund balance - January 1 -
Fund balance - December 31 -$
Budgeted Amounts
86
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Intergovernmental 36,000$ 36,000$ 15,000$ (21,000)$
Fines and forfeiture - - 70,618 70,618
Investment income 300 300 22 (278)
Other revenues 134,061 134,061 112,061 (22,000)
Total revenues 170,361 170,361 197,701 27,340
Expenditures:
Current:
Contractual services 104,000 104,000 58,520 (45,480)
Commodities 15,000 15,000 73,362 58,362
Capital outlay 55,000 55,000 49,607 (5,393)
Total expenditures 174,000 174,000 181,489 7,489
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (3,639)$ (3,639)$ 16,212 19,851$
Fund balance - January 1 525,653
Fund balance - December 31 541,865$
Budgeted Amounts
87
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - BRAEMAR MEMORIAL
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Investment income 200$ 200$ 1,008$ 808$
Donations 5,000 5,000 6,485 1,485
Total revenues 5,200 5,200 7,493 2,293
Expenditures:
Current:
Contractual services - - 243 243
Capital outlay - - 1,395 1,395
Total expenditures - - 1,638 1,638
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 5,200$ 5,200$ 5,855 655$
Fund balance - January 1 142,228
Fund balance - December 31 148,083$
Budgeted Amounts
88
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Franchise taxes 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,173,187$ (26,813)$
Intergovernmental - - 209,307 209,307
Investment income - - 6,111 6,111
Other revenues - - 45,250 45,250
Total revenues 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,433,855 233,855
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services 112,566 112,566 112,139 (427)
Contractual services 20,000 20,000 19,292 (708)
Commodities 20,000 20,000 447 (19,553)
Central services - - - -
Capital outlay 1,100,000 1,100,000 2,205,990 1,105,990
Total expenditures 1,252,566 1,252,566 2,337,868 1,085,302
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (52,566)$ (52,566)$ (904,013) (851,447)$
Fund balance - January 1 713,168
Fund balance (deficits) - December 31 (190,845)$
Budgeted Amounts
89
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - ARTS AND CULTURE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ -$
Investment income - - 57 57
Other revenues 4,850 4,850 2,876 (1,974)
Total revenues 24,850 24,850 22,933 (1,917)
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services - - 63 63
Contractual services 20,400 20,400 15,044 (5,356)
Commodities 2,025 2,025 1,019 (1,006)
Total expenditures 22,425 22,425 16,126 (6,299)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 2,425$ 2,425$ 6,807 4,382$
Fund balance - January 1 2,748
Fund balance - December 31 9,555$
Budgeted Amounts
90
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Franchise taxes 200,000$ 200,000$ 202,619$ 2,619$
Investment income - - 825 825
Other revenues - - 450 450
Total revenues 200,000 200,000 203,894 3,894
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services 103,126 103,126 27,328 (75,798)
Contractual services 35,000 35,000 - (35,000)
Commodities 15,000 15,000 1,821 (13,179)
Total expenditures 153,126 153,126 29,149 (123,977)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 46,874$ 46,874$ 174,745 127,871$
Fund balance - January 1 -
Fund balance - December 31 174,745$
Budgeted Amounts
91
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Intergovernmental -$ -$ 41,197$ 41,197$
Expenditures:
Current:
Capital outlay 104,000 104,000 143,508 39,508
Revenues over (under) expenditures (104,000) (104,000) (102,311) 1,689
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers out - - (16,850) (16,850)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (104,000)$ (104,000)$ (119,161) (15,161)$
Fund balance - January 1 328,671
Fund balance - December 31 209,510$
Budgeted Amounts
92
Debt Service Fund - This fund was established to account for the payment of
principal and interest on the General Obligation, Permanent Improvement
Revolving, Public Project Revenue, and Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds.
Construction Fund - This fund was established to account for various special
assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides
financing for capital improvements as designated in the City's capital
improvement budget.
MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
93
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GOVERNMENTAL FUND - DEBT SERVICE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 5,075,171$ 5,075,171$ 4,998,092$ (77,079)$
Special assessments - - 224,778 224,778
Investment income 10,000 10,000 6,080 (3,920)
Total revenues 5,085,171 5,085,171 5,228,950 143,779
Expenditures:
Debt Service 7,552,545 7,552,545 7,607,202 54,657
Revenues over (under) expenditures (2,467,374) (2,467,374) (2,378,252) 89,122
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 2,630,628 2,630,628 2,400,000 (230,628)
Bonds issued - - 171,933 171,933
Refunding bonds issued - - 3,635,000 3,635,000
Premium on bonds issued - - 232,276 232,276
Discount on bonds issued - - (8,064) (8,064)
Total other financing
sources (uses) 2,630,628 2,630,628 6,431,145 3,800,517
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 163,254$ 163,254$ 4,052,893 3,889,639$
Fund balance - January 1 7,134,575
Fund balance - December 31 11,187,468$
Budgeted Amounts
94
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GOVERNMENTAL FUND - CONSTRUCTION
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 1,680,000$ 1,680,000$ 1,654,525$ (25,475)$
Franchise taxes 105,000 105,000 99,927 (5,073)
Special assessments 4,127,890 4,127,890 5,051,416 923,526
License and permits 90,000 90,000 75,585 (14,415)
Intergovernmental 3,090,000 3,090,000 3,964,655 874,655
Charges for services 35,000 35,000 208,401 173,401
Investment income 70,000 70,000 123,055 53,055
Other revenues 100,000 100,000 305,212 205,212
Total revenues 9,297,890 9,297,890 11,482,776 2,184,886
Expenditures:
Personal services 102,803 102,803 108,423 5,620
Contractual services 214,760 214,760 297,177 82,417
Commodities 26,149 26,149 44,649 18,500
Central services 1,968 1,968 1,848 (120)
Capital outlay 11,732,563 11,732,563 13,735,051 2,002,488
Total expenditures 12,078,243 12,078,243 14,187,148 2,108,905
Revenues over (under) expenditures (2,780,353) (2,780,353) (2,704,372) 75,981
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 200,000 200,000 1,004,542 804,542
Transfers out (2,630,628) (2,630,628) (2,583,577) 47,051
Sale of capital assets - - 65,044 65,044
Bonds issued 3,852,396 3,852,396 3,768,067 (84,329)
Premium on bonds issued - - 218,133 218,133
Discount on bonds issued - - (8,741) (8,741)
Total other financing -
sources (uses) 1,421,768 1,421,768 2,463,468 1,041,700
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (1,358,585)$ (1,358,585)$ (240,904) 1,117,681$
Fund balance - January 1 13,350,342
Fund balance - December 31 13,109,438$
Budgeted Amounts
95
This page left blank intentionally.
96
Enterprise funds account for the financing of self-supporting activities of
governmental units which render services to the general public on a user charge
basis. The following are nonmajor enterprise funds:
Art Center Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the City's Art Center.
Edinborough Park Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to Edinborough
Park.
Centennial Lakes Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to
Centennial Lakes Park.
Sports Dome Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the
Sports Dome.
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
Enterprise Funds
97
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
December 31, 2016
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and investments 260,304$ 1,845,618$ 853,321$ 360,358$ 3,319,601$
Interest receivable 658 5,320 2,138 1,070 9,186
Accounts receivable - 4,982 1,517 6,413 12,912
Due from other funds - - - 44,719 44,719
Inventory 6,986 - - - 6,986
Total current assets 267,948 1,855,920 856,976 412,560 3,393,404
Noncurrent assets:
Net capital assets 90,471 1,138,142 251,450 8,510,233 9,990,296
Deferred outflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 180,186 270,278 180,186 90,093 720,743
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 538,605 3,264,340 1,288,612 9,012,886 14,104,443
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 11,967 27,089 16,251 13,873 69,180
Salaries payable 5,133 18,929 11,827 1,563 37,452
Contracts payable - 22,676 - 2,104 24,780
Due to other governments 711 8,949 1,039 4,844 15,543
Unearned revenue 9,215 30 - - 9,245
Compensated absences payable 10,664 10,732 32,091 - 53,487
Total current liabilities 37,690 88,405 61,208 22,384 209,687
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 8,403 17,457 16,115 - 41,975
Net pension liability 431,308 646,962 431,308 215,654 1,725,232
Compensated absences payable 15,996 16,097 48,137 - 80,230
Total noncurrent liabilities 455,707 680,516 495,560 215,654 1,847,437
Deferred inflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 50,759 76,139 50,759 25,380 203,037
Total liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources 544,156 845,060 607,527 263,418 2,260,161
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 90,471 1,115,466 251,450 8,508,129 9,965,516
Unrestricted (96,022) 1,303,814 429,635 241,339 1,878,766
Total net position (5,551)$ 2,419,280$ 681,085$ 8,749,468$ 11,844,282$
98
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES
AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Operating revenues:
Sales - retail 49,037$ -$ -$ -$ 49,037$
Sales - concessions 391 135,136 23,069 - 158,596
Memberships 14,937 125,641 - - 140,578
Admissions - 617,991 - 10,234 628,225
Building rental - 251,127 108,405 388,367 747,899
Rental of equipment - 12,017 159,608 - 171,625
Greens fees - - 232,700 - 232,700
Class registration & other fees 421,864 224,506 415,639 106 1,062,115
Total operating revenues 486,229 1,366,418 939,421 398,707 3,190,775
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales and services 1,766 79,385 11,149 - 92,300
Personal services 492,501 704,082 620,235 80,491 1,897,309
Contractual services 92,730 288,240 157,147 142,499 680,616
Commodities 77,502 124,011 124,922 17,200 343,635
Central Services 39,394 67,005 58,503 11,464 176,366
Depreciation 23,929 180,549 39,595 418,792 662,865
Total operating expenses 727,822 1,443,272 1,011,551 670,446 3,853,091
Operating income (loss) (241,593) (76,854) (72,130) (271,739) (662,316)
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Investment income 1,890 16,501 6,277 4,114 28,782
Donations 24,168 - 12,500 - 36,668
Miscellaneous - - 2,854 - 2,854
Total nonoperating
revenues (expenses) 26,058 16,501 21,631 4,114 68,304
Income (loss) before transfers (215,535) (60,353) (50,499) (267,625) (594,012)
Transfers:
Transfers in 116,850 25,837 73,210 124,669 340,566
Change in net position (98,685) (34,516) 22,711 (142,956) (253,446)
Net position - January 1 93,134 2,453,796 658,374 8,892,424 12,097,728
Net position - December 31 (5,551)$ 2,419,280$ 681,085$ 8,749,468$ 11,844,282$
99
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Cash flows from operating activities:
Receipts from customers and users 486,079$ 1,369,157$ 937,904$ 538,478$ 3,331,618$
Payment to suppliers (213,458) (555,532) (346,919) (221,466) (1,337,375)
Payment to employees (451,655) (650,100) (586,943) (65,127) (1,753,825)
Donations received 24,168 - 12,500 - 36,668
Miscellaneous received - - 2,854 - 2,854
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (154,866) 163,525 19,396 251,885 279,940
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
Transfer from other funds 116,850 25,837 73,210 124,669 340,566
Proceeds from interfund borrowing - - - 7,103 7,103
Payment of interfund borrowing - - - (44,719) (44,719)
Net cash provided by noncapital
financing activities 116,850 25,837 73,210 87,053 302,950
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets - (195,161) - (390,726) (585,887)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Interest received 1,958 15,661 6,340 3,044 27,003
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and investments (36,058) 9,862 98,946 (48,744) 24,006
Cash and investments - January 1 296,362 1,835,756 754,375 409,102 3,295,595
Cash and investments - December 31 260,304$ 1,845,618$ 853,321$ 360,358$ 3,319,601$
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash
provided (used) by operating activities:
Operating income (loss) (241,593)$ (76,854)$ (72,130)$ (271,739)$ (662,316)$
Adjustments to reconcile operating loss
to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation 23,929 180,549 39,595 418,792 662,865
Donations 24,168 - 12,500 - 36,668
Miscellaneous revenue (expense) - - 2,854 - 2,854
Changes in assets, deferred outflows of resources,
liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources:
Decrease (increase) in receivables - 2,739 (1,517) 139,771 140,993
Decrease (increase) in inventory 1,665 - - - 1,665
Decrease (increase) in deferred outflows
of resources (140,781) (211,171) (140,781) (70,391) (563,124)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (3,401) 2,509 4,024 (52,850) (49,718)
Increase (decrease) in salaries payable 879 5,207 4,241 925 11,252
Increase (decrease) in due to
other governments (330) 600 778 2,547 3,595
Increase (decrease) in unearned revenue (150) - - - (150)
Increase (decrease) in net OPEB obligation 1,480 2,084 852 - 4,416
Increase (decrease) in net pension liability 153,214 229,821 153,214 76,607 612,856
Increase (decrease) in
compensated absences 9,609 3,373 (679) - 12,303
Increase (decrease) in deferred inflows
of resources 16,445 24,668 16,445 8,223 65,781
Total adjustments 86,727 240,379 91,526 523,624 942,256
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (154,866)$ 163,525$ 19,396$ 251,885$ 279,940$
Noncash investing activities:
Increase (decrease) in
fair value of investments (552) (4,621) (1,810) (1,034) (8,017)
Noncash noncapital financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets with
contracts payable - 120,908 - 321,923 442,831
100
Agency funds are used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial
capacity. The following are agency funds:
Police Seizure Fund - This fund accounts for assets seized by the Police
Department.
Public Safety Training Facility - This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the
South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, which is a joint venture that the City has
fiduciary responsibilities for.
Payroll Fund - This fund accounts for assets withheld from employee paychecks
that the City plans to remit to various third parties, including state & local
governments, insurance providers, and others.
FIDUCIARY FUNDS
Agency Funds
101
This page left blank intentionally.
102
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
AGENCY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Balance Balance
January 1 Additions Deductions December 31
POLICE SEIZURE
Assets:
Cash and investments 707$ -$ -$ 707$
Liabilities:
Due to other governmental units 707$ -$ -$ 707$
PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY
Assets:
Cash and investments 375,615$ 1,928,083$ 1,596,883$ 706,815$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 7,270$ 291,622$ 275,704$ 23,188$
Contracts payable -$ 1,034,289$ 741,916$ 292,373
Salaries payable 4,265 278,423 277,447 5,241
Due to other governmental units 364,080 323,749 301,816 386,013
Total Liabilities 375,615$ 1,928,083$ 1,596,883$ 706,815$
PAYROLL
Assets:
Cash and investments 15,040$ 18,668,940$ 18,667,674$ 16,306$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 15,040$ 18,668,940$ 18,667,674$ 16,306$
TOTALS - ALL AGENCY FUNDS
Assets:
Cash and investments 391,362$ 20,597,023$ 20,264,557$ 723,828$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 22,310$ 18,960,562$ 18,943,378$ 39,494$
Contracts payable - 1,034,289 741,916 292,373
Salaries payable 4,265 278,423 277,447 5,241
Due to other governmental units 364,787 323,749 301,816 386,720
Total Liabilities 391,362$ 20,597,023$ 20,264,557$ 723,828$
103
This page left blank intentionally.
104
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TAX CAPACITY, TAX LEVIES AND TAX CAPACITY RATES
(shown by year of tax collectibility)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total tax capacity 106,529,983$ 108,069,277$ 117,907,214$ 125,663,820$ 132,180,439$
Increment valuation (4,194,083) (4,948,237) (1,618,920) (2,493,368) (3,474,097)
Contribution to fiscal
disparities pool (8,831,694) (9,513,808) (9,626,075) (10,679,187) (11,851,919)
Tax capacity used
for rate calculation 93,504,206 93,607,232 106,662,219 112,491,265 116,854,423
Fiscal disparities distribution 2,615,313 2,548,571 2,540,472 2,636,381 2,901,964
Adjusted net tax capacity 96,119,519$ 96,155,803$ 109,202,691$ 115,127,646$ 119,756,387$
Tax levies:
General fund 21,824,894$ 22,509,403$ 22,933,958$ 25,023,952$ 26,860,319$
Arts & culture fund - - 20,000 20,000 20,000
Equipment 992,072 992,072 1,617,072 1,680,000 2,251,550
Debt service 3,314,581 3,325,597 4,510,380 4,503,521 4,595,500
HRA operating - - - - 95,000
Total certified tax levies 26,131,547 26,827,072 29,081,410 31,227,473 33,822,369
Referendum market value levy 615,837 627,800 618,600 571,650 -
Total levy 26,747,384$ 27,454,872$ 29,700,010$ 31,799,123$ 33,822,369$
Tax capacity rate:
General fund revenue 23.762 24.458 22.477 23.223 24.348
Bonds & interest 3.454 3.462 4.128 3.914 3.841
Total tax capacity rate 27.216 27.920 26.605 27.137 28.189
Market value rate 0.00690 0.00695 0.00631 0.00550 -
105
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINED SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS
December 31, 2016
Final
Interest Maturity Original
Rates Date Date Issue Redeemed
General Obligation Bonds:
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2007A 4.00 - 4.25 05/24/07 02/01/28 5,865,000 1,550,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2009A 3.00 - 4.40 04/29/09 02/01/30 14,000,000 2,700,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2010A 2.00 - 4.00 11/18/10 02/01/21 8,285,000 3,425,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2013A -
Refunding 3.00 - 3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 5,710,000 580,000
GO Refunding, Series 2014B 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/17 1,105,000 -
GO Refunding, Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/28 - -
Total General Obligation Bonds 34,965,000 8,255,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds:
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2010B 2.00 - 3.00 11/18/10 02/01/22 2,305,000 645,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00 10/27/11 02/01/23 3,320,000 605,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2012A 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/29 2,675,000 140,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2012A - Refunding 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/19 1,990,000 665,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2013A 3.00 - 3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 2,555,000 -
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2014B - Refunding 2.00 - 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/20 4,075,000 -
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2015A 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/32 6,545,000 - GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2015A - Parking 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/36 2,495,000 -
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/33 - -
Total PIR Bonds 25,960,000 2,055,000
Public Project Revenue Bonds:
Taxable Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10 - 4.55 11/24/09 02/01/30 2,595,000 950,000
HRA Public Project Revenue, Series 2014A 2.00 - 3.625 07/15/14 02/01/35 16,155,000 -
HRA Public Project Revenue, Series 2015A -
Refunding 2.50 - 3.00 07/09/15 05/01/26 3,490,000 -
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 22,240,000 950,000
Edina Emerald Energy Program Revenue Bonds:
Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012A 7.00 02/25/12 01/01/23 33,690 10,107
Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012B 5.50 08/28/12 01/01/18 40,030 24,018
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 73,720 34,125
Revenue Bonds:
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B 2.00 - 3.00 04/29/09 01/01/17 2,010,000 1,845,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009C 2.00 - 4.00 12/10/09 02/01/30 2,440,000 480,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B .45 - 1.60 11/15/12 02/01/20 815,000 235,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00 - 3.00 11/15/12 02/01/33 2,100,000 -
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00 - 3.45 10/10/13 02/01/29 1,125,000 50,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2015B 2.00 - 3.25 07/09/15 02/01/31 2,140,000 -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00 10/27/11 02/01/22 11,230,000 3,080,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/23 6,100,000 1,010,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00 - 3.00 07/15/14 02/01/24 5,680,000 570,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/17 1,830,000 -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/19 5,710,000 -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/25 5,235,000 -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/27 - -
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 46,415,000 7,270,000
Total - Bonded indebtedness 129,653,720$ 18,564,125$
Prior Years
106
Principal Interest Interest
Outstanding Payable Due Due Payable
12/31/2015 Issued Payments 12/31/2016 In 2017 In 2017 to Maturity
4,315,000 - 260,000 4,055,000 4,055,000 83,272 83,272
11,300,000 - 590,000 10,710,000 605,000 400,399 3,318,184
4,860,000 - 730,000 4,130,000 760,000 150,000 426,600
5,130,000 - 280,000 4,850,000 285,000 139,950 1,092,988
1,105,000 - 550,000 555,000 555,000 8,325 8,325
- 3,635,000 - 3,635,000 - 106,035 649,435
26,710,000 3,635,000 2,410,000 27,935,000 6,260,000 887,981 5,578,804
1,660,000 - 225,000 1,435,000 225,000 34,450 121,525
2,715,000 - 315,000 2,400,000 320,000 59,000 244,200
2,535,000 - 145,000 2,390,000 150,000 73,350 504,025
1,325,000 - 355,000 970,000 385,000 31,100 51,800
2,555,000 - 140,000 2,415,000 140,000 69,700 545,425
4,075,000 - 745,000 3,330,000 790,000 79,250 173,500
6,545,000 - - 6,545,000 - 202,675 1,941,363
2,495,000 - - 2,495,000 95,000 79,100 947,901
- 3,940,000 - 3,940,000 - 117,158 1,099,534
23,905,000 3,940,000 1,925,000 25,920,000 2,105,000 745,783 5,629,273
1,645,000 - - 1,645,000 - 66,810 473,809
16,155,000 - 615,000 15,540,000 630,000 478,419 5,315,785
3,490,000 - 285,000 3,205,000 275,000 88,399 473,512
21,290,000 - 900,000 20,390,000 905,000 633,628 6,263,106
23,583 - 3,369 20,214 - 708 4,953
16,012 - 8,006 8,006 - 220 440
39,595 - 11,375 28,220 - 928 5,393
165,000 - 80,000 85,000 85,000 1,275 1,275
1,960,000 - 105,000 1,855,000 105,000 69,625 556,550
580,000 - 125,000 455,000 125,000 5,280 12,119
2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - 53,794 579,503
1,075,000 - 65,000 1,010,000 65,000 30,540 223,718
2,140,000 - - 2,140,000 120,000 57,444 508,478
8,150,000 - 1,090,000 7,060,000 1,115,000 166,600 598,575
5,090,000 - 555,000 4,535,000 575,000 142,650 522,325
5,110,000 - 520,000 4,590,000 530,000 110,250 511,275
1,830,000 - 895,000 935,000 935,000 14,025 14,025
5,710,000 - 1,340,000 4,370,000 1,410,000 109,950 199,500
5,235,000 - 525,000 4,710,000 475,000 128,150 704,550
- 8,775,000 - 8,775,000 - 258,498 1,456,254
39,145,000 8,775,000 5,300,000 42,620,000 5,540,000 1,148,081 5,888,147
111,089,595$ 16,350,000$ 10,546,375$ 116,893,220$ 14,810,000$ 3,416,401$ 23,364,723$
2016
107
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SCHEDULE OF BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
December 31, 2016
Total
District District District District District Tax Increment
No. 1202 No. 1203 No. 1207 No. 1208 No. 1211 Financing Districts
Assets
Cash and Investments 71,769$ 5,858,246$ 354,551$ 3,419,037$ 87,568$ 9,791,171$
Accrued interest 439 16,781 1,052 6,530 243 25,045
Due from other districts - 3,975,000 - - - 3,975,000
Due from other governments - 100,000 - - - 100,000
Total assets 72,208$ 9,950,027$ 355,603$ 3,425,567$ 87,811$ 13,891,216$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 18,412$ 93,519$ -$ 5,827$ 615$ 118,373$
Salaries payable - 1,934 - - - 1,934
Due to other districts - - - 3,875,000 100,000 3,975,000
Total liabilities 18,412 95,453 - 3,880,827 100,615 4,095,307
Fund balance:
Restricted 53,796 9,854,574 355,603 (455,260) (12,804) 9,795,909
Total liabilities and
fund balance 72,208$ 9,950,027$ 355,603$ 3,425,567$ 87,811$ 13,891,216$
108
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2016
Total
District District District District District Tax Increment
No. 1202 No. 1203 No. 1207 No. 1208 No. 1211 Financing Districts
Revenues:
Tax increment collections -$ -$ -$ 2,779,097$ -$ 2,779,097$
Intergovernmental - 50,000 - - - 50,000
Charges for services - 31,094 - - - 31,094
Investment income 866 50,287 3,234 22,928 938 78,253
Total revenues 866 131,381 3,234 2,802,025 938 2,938,444
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 195,313 282,001 - 29,765 5,392 512,471
Capital outlay:
General government - 190,829 - 273,768 - 464,597
Public works - 187,427 - - - 187,427
Total expenditures 195,313 660,257 - 303,533 5,392 1,164,495
Revenues over
(under) expenditures (194,447) (528,876) 3,234 2,498,492 (4,454) 1,773,949
Other financing sources (uses):
Interfund loan interest - 174,000 - (174,000) - -
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance (194,447) (354,876) 3,234 2,324,492 (4,454) 1,773,949
Fund balance - January 1 248,243 10,209,450 352,369 (2,779,752) (8,350) 8,021,960
Fund balance - December 31 53,796$ 9,854,574$ 355,603$ (455,260)$ (12,804)$ 9,795,909$
109
This page left blank intentionally.
110
Contents
Financial Trends
Revenue Capacity
Debt Capacity
Demographic and Economic Information
Operating Information
STATISTICAL SECTION
This part of the City's comprehensive annual financial report presents
detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in
the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary
information says about the City's overall financial health.
Page
112
Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the
comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year.
These schedules contain trend information to help the
reader understand how the City's financial performance
and well-being have changed over time.
These schedules contain information to help the reader
assess the City's most significant local revenue source,
the property tax.
These schedules contain information to help the reader
assess the affordability of the City's current levels of
outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional
debt in the future.
These schedules offer demographic and economic
indicators to help the reader understand the
environment within which the City's financial activities
take place.
These schedules contain service and infrastructure data
to help the reader understand how the information in the
City's financial report relates to the services the City
provides and the activities it performs.
120
124
129
131
111
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NET POSITION BY COMPONENT
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(accrual basis of accounting)
2007 2008 2009 2010
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets 67,680,882$ 71,601,227$ 69,622,370$ 69,783,162$
Restricted - 3,362,446 7,132,865 9,952,443
Unrestricted 25,136,312 29,577,462 30,705,600 41,709,528
Total governmental
activities net position 92,817,194$ 104,541,135$ 107,460,835$ 121,445,133$
Business-type activities
Net investment in capital assets 43,046,160$ 46,851,736$ 47,333,794$ 48,807,806$
Restricted - 954,486 624,837 618,852
Unrestricted 13,649,355 12,071,776 15,158,720 17,041,122
Total business-type
activities net position 56,695,515$ 59,877,998$ 63,117,351$ 66,467,780$
Primary government
Net investment in capital assets 110,727,042$ 118,452,963$ 116,956,164$ 118,590,968$
Restricted - 4,316,932 7,757,702 10,571,295
Unrestricted 38,785,667 41,649,238 45,864,320 58,750,650
Total primary government
net position 149,512,709$ 164,419,133$ 170,578,186$ 187,912,913$
a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of
this change in accounting principle.
b The City implemented GASB 68 in fiscal year 2015. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of
this change in accounting principle.
Fiscal Year
112
2011 2012 2013a 2014 2015b 2016
75,045,018$ 78,644,392$ 83,842,970$ 85,708,114$ 85,838,618$ 93,247,973$
22,915,776 23,215,910 20,289,579 18,268,724 16,925,171 20,892,680
29,544,149 29,587,700 33,242,317 31,316,605 21,957,830 22,146,168
127,504,943$ 131,448,002$ 137,374,866$ 135,293,443$ 124,721,619$ 136,286,821$
56,877,100$ 63,766,144$ 66,126,387$ 75,803,672$ 83,395,794$ 85,158,869$
623,099 876,909 611,377 619,295 793,664 804,393
12,926,674 14,390,609 16,867,459 21,176,026 16,405,405 17,300,872
70,426,873$ 79,033,662$ 83,605,223$ 97,598,993$ 100,594,863$ 103,264,134$
131,922,118$ 142,410,536$ 149,969,357$ 161,511,786$ 169,234,412$ 178,406,842$
23,538,875 24,092,819 20,900,956 18,888,019 17,718,835 21,697,073
42,470,823 43,978,309 50,109,776 52,492,631 38,363,235 39,447,040
197,931,816$ 210,481,664$ 220,980,089$ 232,892,436$ 225,316,482$ 239,550,955$
Fiscal Year
113
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN NET POSITION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(accrual basis of accounting)
2007 2008 2009 2010
Expenses
Governmental activities:
General government 7,039,298$ 6,836,248$ 7,362,560$ 6,961,082$
Public safety 13,743,194 14,833,647 14,751,479 15,543,594
Public works 8,757,022 9,046,873 8,993,290 8,558,363
Parks 5,025,560 5,971,565 7,732,777 5,608,758
Interest on long-term debt 1,887,633 1,923,821 2,129,490 2,528,424
Total governmental activities expenses 36,452,707 38,612,154 40,969,596 39,200,221
Business-type activities:
Utilities 10,036,844 10,625,811 11,833,994 11,848,538
Liquor 10,361,998 11,049,223 11,449,194 11,594,643
Aquatic center 780,981 787,663 798,369 769,608
Golf course 3,621,977 3,612,482 3,588,831 3,561,573
Arena 1,538,407 1,689,660 1,665,082 1,527,536
Community activity centers 2,630,127 2,813,189 2,971,293 2,965,243
Total business-type activities expenses 28,970,334 30,578,028 32,306,763 32,267,141
Total primary government expenses 65,423,041$ 69,190,182$ 73,276,359$ 71,467,362$
Program Revenues
Governmental activities:
Charges for services:
General government 784,659$ 840,070$ 811,087$ 946,107$
Public safety 5,632,642 5,839,683 5,081,563 5,448,505
Other activities 736,329 763,130 804,500 723,559
Operating grants and contributions 1,384,024 1,170,183 1,377,785 1,162,411
Capital grants and contributions 4,299,509 7,710,015 2,582,999 13,325,431
Total governmental activities program revenues 12,837,163 16,323,081 10,657,934 21,606,013
Business-type activities:
Charges for services:
Utilities 13,125,773 13,713,249 14,858,488 15,036,016
Liquor 11,436,175 12,122,599 12,655,777 12,857,064
Aquatic center 868,833 925,388 859,816 945,529
Golf course 3,630,538 3,680,584 3,660,466 3,443,204
Arena 1,414,173 1,399,599 1,414,410 1,301,506
Community activity centers 2,102,938 2,117,619 2,192,274 2,194,476
Operating grants and contributions 127,492 147,456 135,917 373,230
Total business-type activities program revenues 32,705,922 34,106,494 35,777,148 36,151,025
Total primary government program revenues 45,543,085$ 50,429,575$ 46,435,082$ 57,757,038$
Net (Expense)/Revenue
Governmental activities (23,615,544)$ (22,289,073)$ (30,311,662)$ (17,594,208)$
Business-type activities 3,735,588 3,528,466 3,470,385 3,883,884
Total primary government net expense (19,879,956)$ (18,760,607)$ (26,841,277)$ (13,710,324)$
General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position
Governmental activities:
Property taxes 21,459,001$ 22,242,276$ 23,834,274$ 25,122,113$
Tax increment collections 7,793,577 8,578,434 7,587,386 4,488,073
Franchise taxes 570,871 647,466 667,791 692,288
Lodging taxes - - - -
Unrestricted investment earnings 1,581,702 1,185,899 387,177 474,444
Gain on disposal of capital assets 58,377 1,265 11,709 35,594
Insurance recovery - - - -
Transfers 919,625 967,800 743,025 765,994
Total governmental activities 32,383,153 33,623,140 33,231,362 31,578,506
Business-type activities:
Property taxes -$ -$ 300,372$ -$
Unrestricted investment earnings 510,678 607,312 209,371 205,965
Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets 7,604 14,505 2,250 26,574
Transfers (919,625) (967,800) (743,025) (765,994)
Total business-type activities (401,343) (345,983) (231,032) (533,455)
Total primary government 31,981,810$ 33,277,157$ 33,000,330$ 31,045,051$
Change in Net Position
Governmental activities 8,767,609$ 11,334,067$ 2,919,700$ 13,984,298$
Business-type activities 3,334,245 3,182,483 3,239,353 3,350,429
Total primary government 12,101,854$ 14,516,550$ 6,159,053$ 17,334,727$
a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle.
b The City completed a major departmental reorganization in 2014, moving parks maintenance activities from parks to public works. Prior year
information has not been modified as a result of this change.
c The City implemented GASB 68 in fiscal year 2015. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle.
Fiscal Year
114
2011 2012 2013a 2014b 2015c 2016
7,013,231$ 12,598,979$ 8,256,261$ 8,522,319$ 8,518,236$ 9,587,567$
16,024,575 16,598,423 17,117,693 18,145,498 19,507,770 20,243,209
9,193,336 9,437,285 11,502,250 15,553,852 15,284,777 19,444,472
5,540,585 5,904,724 6,132,709 3,330,781 3,385,367 3,822,716
2,339,370 2,222,392 2,024,749 1,989,863 2,180,678 2,133,474
40,111,097 46,761,803 45,033,662 47,542,313 48,876,828 55,231,438
12,130,685 12,610,875 13,748,186 14,207,197 14,963,304 16,780,474
11,727,106 11,740,744 12,261,413 12,393,218 11,818,602 12,130,254
718,027 866,944 822,932 827,485 872,960 915,560
3,390,949 3,293,192 3,199,815 3,342,544 3,409,343 3,041,169
1,689,001 2,182,200 2,272,510 2,375,173 2,642,097 2,842,660
2,998,915 2,842,139 2,967,115 2,975,782 3,436,325 3,853,091
32,654,683 33,536,094 35,271,971 36,121,399 37,142,631 39,563,208
72,765,780$ 80,297,897$ 80,305,633$ 83,663,712$ 86,019,459$ 94,794,646$
969,745$ 1,142,984$ 1,259,908$ 1,529,555$ 1,322,430$ 1,453,009$
5,988,485 6,549,929 7,410,755 8,102,352 8,683,465 8,996,046
775,676 913,864 846,999 960,261 1,158,207 1,289,770
1,392,892 1,685,026 2,283,007 1,578,538 3,122,178 2,751,495
5,770,912 9,137,011 6,372,735 8,244,695 10,044,077 15,252,861
14,897,710 19,428,814 18,173,404 20,415,401 24,330,357 29,743,181
15,873,937 17,729,589 17,831,225 17,550,802 19,335,443 19,505,905
13,172,484 13,230,941 13,711,557 13,515,168 12,462,387 12,937,092
913,383 1,001,946 928,055 918,412 971,936 956,068
3,285,741 3,225,591 2,711,743 3,229,348 2,857,190 2,809,702
1,315,435 1,452,435 1,942,971 2,092,567 2,316,853 2,314,892
2,331,136 2,399,090 2,625,633 2,583,257 3,119,789 3,190,775
135,428 1,042,195 516,242 428,416 595,141 445,464
37,027,544 40,081,787 40,267,426 40,317,970 41,658,739 42,159,898
51,925,254$ 59,510,601$ 58,440,830$ 60,733,371$ 65,989,096$ 71,903,079$
(25,213,387)$ (27,332,989)$ (26,860,258)$ (27,126,912)$ (24,546,471)$ (25,488,257)$
4,372,861 6,545,693 4,995,455 4,196,571 4,516,108 2,596,690
(20,840,526)$ (20,787,296)$ (21,864,803)$ (22,930,341)$ (20,030,363)$ (22,891,567)$
25,040,871$ 25,884,662$ 26,894,161$ 27,062,224$ 29,632,072$ 31,396,421$
4,083,345 3,536,935 3,981,938 5,052,705 1,792,896 2,779,097
722,160 815,530 1,891,967 2,055,396 2,089,038 2,346,423
- - - 11,301 22,716 22,624
601,250 341,986 (96,390) 440,051 195,620 344,277
131,365 - 16,654 29,037 41,900 65,044
- - 816,654 - - -
694,206 696,935 133,907 (9,605,225) (2,230,966) 99,573
31,273,197 31,276,048 33,638,891 25,045,489 31,543,276 37,053,459
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
280,438 113,177 (77,848) 191,974 91,907 136,208
- 2,644,854 17,587 - 39,427 35,946
(694,206) (696,935) (133,907) 9,605,225 2,230,966 (99,573)
(413,768) 2,061,096 (194,168) 9,797,199 2,362,300 72,581
30,859,429$ 33,337,144$ 33,444,723$ 34,842,688$ 33,905,576$ 37,126,040$
6,059,810$ 3,943,059$ 6,778,633$ (2,081,423)$ 6,996,805$ 11,565,202$
3,959,093 8,606,789 4,801,287 13,993,770 6,878,408 2,669,271
10,018,903$ 12,549,848$ 11,579,920$ 11,912,347$ 13,875,213$ 14,234,473$
Fiscal Year
115
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
2007 2008 2009a 2010
General fund
Reserved 28,637$ 13,982$ 18,241$ 10,258$
Unreserved 14,078,220 14,365,021 12,031,358 12,868,952
Nonspendable - - - -
Restricted - - - -
Assigned - - - -
Unassigned - - - -
Total general fund 14,106,857$ 14,379,003$ 12,049,599$ 12,879,210$
All other governmental funds
Reserved 6,247,539$ 8,467,918$ 15,223,353$ 9,460,834$
Unreserved, reported in:
Special revenue funds 14,750,448 14,950,538 12,813,439 15,333,460
Capital projects funds 5,853,322 4,270,440 6,683,668 12,150,968
Restricted, reported in:
Special revenue funds - - - -
Debt service funds - - - -
Construction funds - - - -
Assigned, reported in:
Capital projects funds - - - -
Unassigned, reported in:
Special revenue funds - - - -
Total all other governmental funds 26,851,309$ 27,688,896$ 34,720,460$ 36,945,262$
a The substantial decrease in general fund unreserved fund balance in 2009 is due to the transfer
of the equipment replacement program to the construction fund.
The substantial increase in other governmental funds reserved fund balance in 2009 is due to
unspent bond proceeds related to the new Public Works Facility, which is under construction.
b The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental
Fund Type Definitions" in 2011. The City did not apply the statement retroactively.
c The substantial increase in other governmental funds restricted fund balance in is due to unspent
bond proceeds related to the current refunding that took place on February 1 of the following year.
Fiscal Year
116
2011b 2012 2013 2014c 2015 2016c
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
- - - - - -
10,871 413,200 13,322 240,291 529,513 27,643
178,295 880,395 185,395 757,673 417,673 927,673
1,539,286 1,643,077 1,559,461 1,566,329 1,547,398 1,612,240
11,744,764 11,902,462 12,573,457 11,429,444 11,825,799 14,624,755
13,473,216$ 14,839,134$ 14,331,635$ 13,993,737$ 14,320,383$ 17,192,311$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
17,178,857 13,185,962 13,040,516 9,719,309 9,405,757 12,883,505
8,068,183 9,704,408 6,246,769 12,678,291 7,134,575 11,187,468
2,087,548 2,759,463 3,318,947 6,598,832 551,132 -
8,098,935 7,159,890 8,354,268 7,046,610 13,127,881 13,109,438
- - - - - (190,845)
35,433,523$ 32,809,723$ 30,960,500$ 36,043,042$ 30,219,345$ 36,989,566$
.
Fiscal Year
117
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
2007a 2008 2009 2010
Revenues
General property taxes 21,459,001$ 22,242,276$ 23,834,274$ 25,122,113$
Tax increment collections 7,793,577 8,578,434 7,587,386 4,488,073
Franchise taxes 570,871 647,466 667,791 692,288
Lodging fees - - - -
Special assessments 1,750,444 2,442,490 2,703,833 6,746,186
License and permits 2,909,521 2,915,455 2,104,967 2,410,314
Intergovernmental 3,699,006 3,005,883 1,507,170 3,726,849
Charges for services 2,748,709 3,093,941 2,905,410 3,014,894
Fines and forfeitures 971,486 1,073,174 1,224,983 1,203,767
Investment income 1,581,702 1,185,899 387,177 474,444
Rental of property 355,734 255,607 343,616 426,517
Parkland dedication - - - -
Other revenues 225,839 126,723 160,035 413,400
Total revenues 44,065,890 45,567,348 43,426,642 48,718,845
Expenditures
General government 6,544,307 6,235,352 6,895,329 6,523,398
Public safety 12,985,215 13,788,797 13,692,686 14,177,387
Public works 5,787,619 6,189,594 5,911,758 5,898,023
Parks 3,455,789 3,693,595 3,688,063 3,524,950
Capital outlay: 11,991,122 14,666,907 22,997,065 13,505,827
Debt service
Principal 6,190,000 7,090,000 7,415,000 2,975,000
Interest and other charges 1,677,770 1,967,021 1,841,342 2,584,006
Total expenditures 48,631,822 53,631,266 62,441,243 49,188,591
Revenues over (under) expenditures (4,565,932) (8,063,918) (19,014,601) (469,746)
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in 7,290,391 7,983,585 11,347,773 2,903,762
Transfers out (6,370,766) (7,015,785) (10,604,748) (2,137,768)
Sale of capital assets 66,845 96,825 34,592 134,329
Insurance recovery - - - -
Bonds issued 11,735,000 7,755,000 22,950,000 2,535,000
Refunding bonds issued - - - 8,285,000
Premium on bonds issued - - 64,765 898,658
Discount on bonds issued (53,637) (35,848) (75,621) -
Payment to refunding escrow - - - (9,094,822)
Total other financing sources (uses) 12,667,833 8,783,777 23,716,761 3,524,159
Net change in fund balances 8,101,901$ 719,859$ 4,702,160$ 3,054,413$
Debt service as a percentage of
noncapital expenditures 21.5% 22.6% 21.7% 15.4%
a The substantial change in debt service as a percentage of noncapital expenditures in 2007 is due
to a change in the way this ratio is calculated. The City did not recalculate previously reported ratios.
Fiscal Year
118
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
24,972,166$ 25,838,422$ 26,891,756$ 26,988,493$ 29,535,270$ 31,354,023$
4,083,345 3,536,935 3,981,938 5,052,705 1,792,896 2,779,097
722,160 815,530 1,891,967 2,055,396 2,089,038 2,346,423
- - - 11,301 22,716 22,624
4,502,112 4,975,641 4,884,510 4,606,010 4,132,128 5,276,194
2,724,763 3,155,351 4,150,512 4,583,183 4,907,364 5,268,519
3,059,964 2,032,966 2,509,166 3,961,509 6,093,966 5,775,114
3,181,961 3,708,482 3,667,612 4,270,720 4,414,991 4,689,389
1,243,426 1,195,054 1,109,710 1,163,907 1,195,271 1,016,817
601,250 341,986 (96,390) 440,051 195,314 344,344
539,091 506,276 518,862 546,874 416,522 514,955
- 702,100 - 757,278 800,000 1,250,000
156,231 240,841 278,607 78,775 361,425 2,599,830
45,786,469 47,049,584 49,788,250 54,516,202 55,956,901 63,237,329
5,739,481 6,624,573 7,351,556 7,625,826 6,337,944 6,815,725
14,668,772 14,985,068 15,859,622 16,647,821 17,537,528 18,554,507
6,000,539 6,277,506 7,018,614 10,201,335 10,578,472 10,474,008
3,633,922 3,852,260 3,915,568 1,341,884 1,416,858 1,529,384
14,235,496 13,622,443 10,690,207 19,883,144 19,912,565 16,787,575
4,480,000 6,620,000 14,531,375 4,096,375 13,276,375 5,246,375
2,278,068 2,292,394 2,270,259 1,923,647 2,375,613 2,360,827
51,036,278 54,274,244 61,637,201 61,720,032 71,435,355 61,768,401
(5,249,809) (7,224,660) (11,848,951) (7,203,830) (15,478,454) 1,468,928
5,615,669 4,495,940 3,472,964 1,404,975 3,232,770 3,504,542
(4,921,463) (3,799,005) (3,339,057) (11,010,200) (6,472,066) (3,404,969)
209,773 94,975 61,642 70,603 78,509 65,044
- - 816,654 - 167,167 -
3,320,000 2,748,720 2,555,000 16,155,000 9,040,000 3,940,000
- 1,990,000 5,710,000 5,180,000 3,490,000 3,635,000
108,097 436,148 275,360 327,987 492,838 450,409
- - (60,334) (179,891) (47,815) (16,805)
- - - - - -
4,332,076 5,966,778 9,492,229 11,948,474 9,981,403 8,173,221
(917,733)$ (1,257,882)$ (2,356,722)$ 4,744,644$ (5,497,051)$ 9,642,149$
17.8% 19.4% 32.2% 13.7% 28.9% 16.2%
Fiscal Year
119
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
ASSESSED VALUE, ACTUAL VALUE AND TAX CAPACITY OF TAXABLE PROPERTY
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
City Tax City
Used Adjusted Capacity Referendum
Estimated Limited Taxable Total for Rate Net Rate Rate
9,619,356$ 9,456,650$ 9,451,668$ 113,429$ 96,170$ 98,765$ 21.150% 0.00641% 2.172$
9,986,738 9,933,166 9,928,907 120,084 100,954 103,850 21.197% 0.00601% 2.204
10,112,498 10,091,005 10,079,499 122,532 101,831 105,130 22.447% 0.00597% 2.334
9,960,341 9,960,341 9,949,807 120,817 104,914 108,452 22.972% 0.00606% 2.501
9,441,688 9,441,688 9,431,941 113,981 98,897 102,319 24.660% 0.00654% 2.672
9,179,305 9,179,305 9,025,565 109,013 94,811 97,879 26.247% 0.00667% 2.799
8,955,431 8,955,431 8,798,601 106,530 93,504 96,120 27.216% 0.00690% 2.921
9,065,550 9,065,550 8,911,695 108,069 93,607 96,156 27.920% 0.00695% 2.961
9,837,972 9,837,972 9,701,677 117,907 106,662 109,203 26.605% 0.00631% 2.953
10,420,339 10,420,339 10,296,342 125,664 112,491 115,128 27.137% 0.00550% 2.998
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown.
The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification.
b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of
assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity
based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity
(see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate"). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only.
2016
Year
2014
2015
Estimated
Rate b
Market Value (In Thousands) a Tax Capacity (In Thousands)
2013
Fiscal Direct
2011
2012
2007
2008
2009
2010
120
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX CAPACITY RATES
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Total
Basic Debt Total Tax Direct &
Rate Rate Capacity RMV Hennepin Tax Cap. RMV Other Overlap
19.636% 1.514% 21.150% 0.006% 39.110% 18.244% 0.147% 8.417% 86.921%
19.563% 1.634% 21.197% 0.006% 38.571% 16.951% 0.177% 8.546% 85.265%
20.204% 2.243% 22.447% 0.006% 40.413% 17.766% 0.183% 8.413% 89.039%
20.004% 2.968% 22.972% 0.006% 42.640% 18.746% 0.194% 9.431% 93.789%
21.548% 3.112% 24.660% 0.007% 45.840% 21.786% 0.196% 10.489% 102.775%
23.131% 3.116% 26.247% 0.007% 48.231% 27.565% 0.215% 10.911% 112.954%
23.762% 3.454% 27.216% 0.007% 49.461% 27.762% 0.217% 11.483% 115.922%
24.458% 3.462% 27.920% 0.007% 49.959% 27.556% 0.223% 12.051% 117.486%
22.477% 4.128% 26.605% 0.006% 46.398% 27.344% 0.215% 11.100% 111.447%
23.223% 3.914% 27.137% 0.006% 45.356% 34.898% 0.201% 10.763% 118.154%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
RMV: Referendum Market Value
Geographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different
school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit,
Hennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City,
Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates.
City Rates Overlapping Rates
ISD #273 EdinaFiscal
Year
2016
2011
2012
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
2014
2015
121
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAX PAYERS
CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO
Percentage Percentage
of Total of Total
Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Tax Capacity Rank Capacity
Southdale Shopping Center 2,727,650$ 1 2.17% 3,497,098$ 1 3.08%
Galleria Shopping Center 2,257,995 2 1.80% 1,300,806 2 1.15%
Southdale Medical Building 1,491,755 3 1.19% 419,014 9 0.37%
Southdale Office Center 906,994 4 0.72% 827,534 3 0.73%
Centennial Lakes Retail 859,250 5 0.68% 0.00%
Centennial Lakes Phase V 703,404 6 0.56% 663,520 4 0.58%
Centennial Lakes Phase IV 689,778 7 0.55% 650,646 5 0.57%
7700 France 543,365 8 0.43% 554,076 6 0.49%
The District 534,756 9 0.43% 0.00%
Westin Galleria 507,449 10 0.40% 0.00%
May Department Stores - 0.00% 513,070 7 0.45%
Centennial Lakes Medical Bldg - 0.00% 443,108 8 0.39%
Centennial Lakes Phase III - 0.00% 406,798 10 0.36%
Totals 11,222,396$ 8.93% 9,275,670$ 8.18%
Source: City of Edina Assessing Office
20072016
Taxpayer
122
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Total Collections in
Tax Percentage Subsequent Percentage
Levy Amount of Levy Years Amount of Levy
21,530,528$ 21,347,789$ a 99.15%a 65,836$ 21,413,625$ 99.46%
22,605,669 22,178,719 b 98.11%b 174,769 22,353,488 98.88%
24,153,933 23,484,137 c 97.23%c 69,437 23,553,574 97.51%
25,492,973 24,904,346 97.69% (310,913) 24,593,433 96.47%
25,786,217 25,067,625 97.21% (202,079) 24,865,546 96.43%
26,248,226 25,983,685 98.99% (142,619) 25,841,066 98.45%
26,747,384 26,545,984 99.25% (194,861) 26,351,123 98.52%
27,454,872 27,326,092 99.53% (46,459) 27,279,633 99.36%
29,700,010 29,497,362 99.32% (40,897) 29,456,465 99.18%
31,799,123 31,383,415 98.69% - 31,383,415 98.69%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
a In 2007 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for MVHC after five years of not making payments.
b In 2008 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for only 50% of MVHC.
c In 2009 the State of Minnesota once again quit reimbursing the City for MVHC.
Total Collections to Date
Taxes
Payable
2011
2012
2016
Collected within the
Fiscal Year of the Levy
2010
2007
2008
2009
2014
2013
2015
123
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands, except per capita)
General Public Tax Permanent EEEP Rec. Utility Total Percentage
Obligation Project Increment Improvement Revenue Facility Revenue Primary of Personal Per
Debt Revenue Bonds Revolving Bonds Bonds Bonds Government Income Capita
a
10,963$ 15,235$ 15,628$ 7,152$ -$ 3,675$ 11,133$ 63,786$ 2.39% 1,355$
10,393 14,531 10,000 14,719 - 2,835 23,779 76,257 2.99% 1,583
24,057 22,442 4,115 14,574 - 4,479 21,713 91,380 3.54% 1,897
32,595 13,282 3,314 16,254 - 4,059 19,507 89,011 3.39% 1,857
30,417 13,077 2,477 18,353 - 3,569 28,800 96,693 3.66% 2,004
28,318 11,787 550 22,067 74 5,952 33,160 101,908 3.71% 2,087
32,035 5,627 - 18,889 62 6,540 29,635 92,788 2.91% 1,885
30,806 21,445 - 21,554 51 6,249 39,633 119,738 3.97% 2,382
27,225 21,300 - 24,776 40 8,055 32,575 113,971 3.62% 2,245
28,560 20,395 - 26,874 28 7,677 36,691 120,225 3.72% 2,368
Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements.
All figures are presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments if applicable.
a Population data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council found on page 129.
Business-Type Activities
Year
Fiscal
2016
2007
2008
2009
2010
2013
2014
2011
2012
2015
Governmental Activities
124
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands, except per capita)
Less: Amounts Available Percentage of
General Obligation Debt a in Debt Service Fund b Total Property Value
c Per Capita
10,963$ 2,891$ 8,072$ 0.08% 233$
10,393 3,669 6,724 0.07% 216
24,057 5,454 18,603 0.18% 499
32,595 6,105 26,490 0.27% 680
30,417 8,068 22,349 0.24% 630
28,318 9,704 18,614 0.20% 580
32,035 6,247 25,788 0.29% 651
30,806 12,678 18,128 0.20% 613
27,225 7,135 20,090 0.20% 536
28,560 11,187 17,373 0.17% 563
Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements.
a Presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments.
b This is the amount restricted for debt service principal payments.
c See statistical schedule titled "Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property" for
estimated property value data.
Year
Fiscal
2011
2016
2014
2013
2012
2007
2008
2009
2010
2015
125
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016
Net General Percentage
Obligation Bonded Applicable City Share
Debt Outstanding in City a of Debt
Overlapping Debt:
Hennepin County 811,375,883$ 7.43% 60,285,228$
Hennepin Suburban Park District 47,787,952 10.32% 4,931,717
Hennepin Regional Rail Authority 32,848,204 10.32% 3,389,935
School Districts:
ISD No. 273 (Edina) 171,809,849 98.50% 169,232,701
ISD No. 270 (Hopkins) 135,244,990 7.61% 10,292,144
ISD No. 271 (Bloomington) 49,733,883 0.01% 4,973
ISD No. 272 (Eden Prairie) 53,008,080 1.01% 535,382
ISD No. 280 (Richfield) 24,664,879 30.23% 7,456,193
ISD No. 283 (St. Louis Park) 37,433,271 0.01% 3,743
Metro Council 38,874,706 3.77% 1,465,576
Total Overlapping Debt 1,402,781,697 257,597,592
City of Edina 75,857,300 100.00% 75,857,300
Total Overlapping and Direct Debt 1,478,638,997$ 333,454,892$
Ratio of debt per capita (50,766 population) 6,568$
Ratio of debt to estimated market valuation of $10,420,339,300 3.20%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services
a The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using tax capacity. Applicable percentages
were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's tax capacity that is within
the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total tax capacity.
Direct Debt:
Debt Ratios:
126
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands)
2007 2008a 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Debt limit 199,775$ 302,385$ 301,369$ 298,494$ 282,958$ 270,767$ 263,958$ 267,351$ 291,050$ 308,890$
Total net debt
applicable
to limit 26,380 25,095 46,670 45,170 42,860 39,545 37,030 51,760 48,000 48,325
Legal debt
margin 173,395$ 277,290$ 254,699$ 253,324$ 240,098$ 231,222$ 226,928$ 215,591$ 243,050$ 260,565$
Total net debt
applicable to
the limit as a
percentage of
debt limit 13.20% 8.30% 15.49% 15.13% 15.15% 14.60% 14.03% 19.36% 16.49% 15.64%
Market value (after fiscal disparities)
Debt limit (3% of market value)
Debt applicable to limit:
General obligation bonds
Public project revenue bonds
Total debt applicable to limit
Legal debt margin
a The State of Minnesota changed the legal debt limit from 2% of taxable market value to 3% during 2008.
308,890,246
20,390,000
260,565,246$
Fiscal Year
10,296,341,540$
27,935,000
48,325,000
Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2016
127
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Less: operating Net available
Revenue expenses revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage
Public Project Revenue Bonds (Annual Appropriation Lease Revenue)
2007 1,497,500$ -$ 1,497,500$ 690,000$ 725,855$ 1,415,855$ 1.06
2008 1,425,186 - 1,425,186 715,000 696,118 1,411,118 1.01
2009 1,424,405 - 1,424,405 745,000 665,193 1,410,193 1.01
2010 1,421,354 - 1,421,354 9,280,000 901,535 10,181,535 0.14
2011 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 210,000 574,681 784,681 1.72
2012 1,362,444 - 1,362,444 1,295,000 548,691 1,843,691 0.74
2013 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 6,225,000 589,734 6,814,734 0.20
2014 1,356,844 - 1,356,844 235,000 223,754 458,754 2.96
2015 2,521,840 - 2,521,840 3,760,000 729,879 4,489,879 0.56
2016 2,499,521 - 2,499,521 900,000 654,473 1,554,473 1.61
Tax Increment Bonds
2007 7,793,577 - 7,793,577 4,795,000 625,606 5,420,606 1.44
2008 8,578,434 - 8,578,434 5,650,000 445,694 6,095,694 1.41
2009 7,587,386 - 7,587,386 5,890,000 244,236 6,134,236 1.24
2010 4,488,073 - 4,488,073 805,000 125,820 930,820 4.82
2011 4,083,345 - 4,083,345 840,000 94,359 934,359 4.37
2012 3,536,935 - 3,536,935 1,930,000 48,445 1,978,445 1.79
2013 3,981,939 - 3,981,939 550,000 9,350 559,350 7.12
2014 5,052,705 - 5,052,705 - - - -
2015 1,792,896 - 1,792,896 - - - -
2016 2,779,097 - 2,779,097 - - - -
Permanent Improvement Revolving Bonds (Special Assessment)
2007 391,921 - 391,921 160,000 46,694 206,694 1.90
2008 564,534 - 564,534 155,000 306,759 461,759 1.22
2009 1,508,662 - 1,508,662 150,000 513,708 663,708 2.27
2010 1,339,350 - 1,339,350 655,000 520,278 1,175,278 1.14
2011 2,466,395 - 2,466,395 1,330,000 524,964 1,854,964 1.33
2012 2,520,862 - 2,520,862 1,375,000 557,514 1,932,514 1.30
2013 2,837,227 - 2,837,227 5,745,000 567,551 6,312,551 0.45
2014 2,870,102 - 2,870,102 1,555,000 548,927 2,103,927 1.36
2015 3,732,374 - 3,732,374 6,015,000 503,029 6,518,029 0.57
2016 4,727,881 - 4,727,881 1,925,000 705,628 2,630,628 1.80
Utility Bond
2007 13,125,419 9,735,839 3,389,580 690,000 108,840 798,840 4.24
2008 13,544,728 10,076,422 3,468,306 1,485,000 459,983 1,944,983 1.78
2009 14,857,798 10,815,216 4,042,582 2,045,000 803,157 2,848,157 1.42
2010 15,034,881 11,119,053 3,915,828 2,185,000 768,160 2,953,160 1.33
2011 15,871,102 11,438,288 4,432,814 2,270,000 693,285 2,963,285 1.50
2012 17,723,103 11,811,468 5,911,635 2,360,000 811,990 3,171,990 1.86
2013 17,830,425 12,893,159 4,937,266 3,400,000 933,970 4,333,970 1.14
2014 17,548,883 13,443,940 4,104,943 3,670,000 884,075 4,554,075 0.90
2015 19,334,023 14,387,132 4,946,891 12,300,000 882,427 13,182,427 0.38
2016 19,472,645 16,222,211 3,250,434 4,925,000 814,238 5,739,238 0.57
Recreational Facility Bonds
2007 5,870,485 5,798,005 72,480 905,000 168,159 1,073,159 0.07
2008 6,005,571 5,972,558 33,013 845,000 135,956 980,956 0.03
2009 5,932,900 5,977,793 (44,893) 860,000 92,128 952,128 (0.05)
2010 5,690,239 5,822,861 (132,622) 415,000 100,926 515,926 (0.26)
2011 5,510,043 5,760,947 (250,904) 485,000 115,050 600,050 (0.42)
2012 5,679,972 6,240,222 (560,250) 520,000 105,000 625,000 (0.90)
2013 5,582,769 6,118,195 (535,426) 550,000 138,127 688,127 (0.78)
2014 6,239,445 6,358,030 (118,585) 290,000 176,197 466,197 (0.25)
2015 6,137,111 6,258,138 (121,027) 350,000 176,808 526,808 (0.23)
2016 6,080,529 6,593,312 (512,783) 375,000 231,285 606,285 (0.85)
Debt service requirementsFiscal
Year
128
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Estimated
Personal Per Capita High School
Income Personal Graduation Unemployment
Population (In thousands) Income Rate Rate
47,090 2,673,959$ 56,784$ 92.0% 3.45%
48,169 2,547,369 52,884 92.0% 4.33%
48,169 2,582,436 53,612 92.4% 6.38%
47,941 2,622,564 54,704 91.6% 5.56%
48,262 2,640,124 54,704 92.2% 5.25%
48,829 2,749,854 56,316 97.4% 4.56%
49,216 3,193,922 64,896 97.7% 3.98%
50,261 3,018,676 60,060 97.8% 3.10%
50,766 3,146,680 61,984 97.9% 2.82%
50,766 3,231,154 63,648 97.7% 3.08%
Sources:
Population data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council. 2015 is the most recent.
Personal income and per capita income estimates based on MN Department of Employment
and Economic Development Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. 2015 is the most recent.
High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County.
Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.
2016
2013
2014
Fiscal
Year
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2015
129
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS
CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO
Percentage of Percentage of
Total City Total City
Employees Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment
Fairview Southdale Hospital 2,613 1 10.87% 2,500 2 11.21%
Edina Public Schools ISD #273 1,245 2 5.18% 1,172 4 5.25%
BI Worldwide 1,000 3 4.16% DNA DNA DNA
Regis Corporation 900 4 3.75% DNA DNA DNA
City of Edina 814 5 3.39% 277 7 1.24%
Edina Realty 400 6 1.66% 210 9 0.94%
International Dairy Queen Inc. 400 7 1.66% 300 6 1.34%
FilmTec Corporation 375 8 1.56% DNA DNA DNA
Lund Food Holdings, Inc 360 9 1.50% DNA DNA DNA
JC Penny Co. 276 10 1.15% 250 8 1.12%
Macy's (Marshall Field's or Dayton's) - 0.00% 1,200 3 5.38%
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. - 0.00% 4,500 1 20.17%
Con Agra Foods - 0.00% 196 10 0.88%
Barr Engineering - 0.00% DNA DNA DNA
Nash Finch Co. - 0.00% 350 5 1.57%
Totals 8,383 34.89% 10,955 49.11%
Sources:
2016 data from ReferenceUSA, written and telephone survey (April 2016) done by Ehlers,
and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.
2007 data from previous CAFR.
DNA: Historical data is not available
20072016
Employer
130
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 b 2013 b 2014 b 2015 2016
Administration
General Fund 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 6.85 5.85 4.85 4.85 5.00
HRA Fund - - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00
Liquor Fund 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Communications and Technology Services
General Fund 2.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.50 4.65 5.15 6.15 6.15 6.00
Central Services 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Community Development
General Fund 10.75 10.75 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 12.00 12.00 12.00
Engineering
General Fund 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 10.50 12.00 12.00 13.00 14.00
Finance
General Fund 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 6.00 6.00 5.00
Utilities Fund 1.75 1.75 2.75 2.75 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Liquor Fund 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 - - -
Fire Protection
General Fund 40.50 40.50 40.50 40.50 39.50 39.75 42.75 42.85 43.85 45.90
Utilities Fund 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 -
Human Resources
General Fund - - - - - 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00
Parks & Recreation
General Fund 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 8.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Aquatic Center 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.60
Golf Course 13.00 13.00 13.00 13.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 8.05
Arena 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.85
Sports Dome - - - - - - - - - 0.15
Art Center 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Edinborough Park 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.80 5.80 5.80 5.80
Centennial Lakes 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Police Protection
General Fund 73.75 73.75 74.65 73.65 71.15 71.65 70.65 72.50 70.50 72.55
Utilities Fund 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.45
Public Works
General Fund 48.40 48.40 47.40 47.40 47.20 48.20 46.40 43.35 43.35 43.45
Construction Fund 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10
Utilities Fund 13.25 13.25 15.25 15.25 14.45 13.95 13.75 15.20 15.20 16.85
Central Services 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 11.00 11.00 10.25
Other 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - - - -
Total 278.00 278.00 281.00 280.00 274.00 278.00 281.00 285.00 285.00 287.00
Source: City of Edina 2016-2017 Budget
a Full-time employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. In a typical
year the City will employ an additional 600-700 people in these categories.
b The City completed a major departmental reorganization that is reflected on this chart between years 2012-2014.
In some cases, data for years before the reorganization has been modified from what was originally reported to
improve comparisons.
Budgeted Full-time Employees for Fiscal Year a
Function
131
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
General Government
Total City employees 890 918 885 869 892 989 1,040 1,093 1,077 1,155
Votes cast a 7,930 31,512 2,733 25,463 7,957 31,841 3,480 24,049 9,370 31,986
Public Works
Asphalt placed (tons) 8,000 7,500 9,500 7,643 8,500 9,000 9,273 8,383 8,888 9,298
Concrete (cu. yds.) 850 480 640 503 558 667 560 396 670 897
Public Safety
Crimes reported 2,010 2,025 1,985 1,890 1,590 1,628 1,594 1,571 2,015 N/A
Fire calls 1,012 913 852 910 960 858 893 926 1,251 1,276
Medical calls 3,510 3,516 3,496 3,599 3,652 3,946 3,803 3,982 3,818 4,063
Central Services
Vehicle fixes 2,460 2,967 2,539 2,431 2,331 2,546 3,493 3,277 2,923 2,721
Utilities
Daily consumption b 7,372 7,376 7,596 6,790 6,909 7,613 6,652 6,489 6,308 6,047
Aquatic Center
Attendance 114,173 110,000 64,836 86,654 77,696 139,909 91,340 92,200 128,523 108,609
Golf Course
Total rounds played 112,821 112,663 117,819 101,314 95,771 96,496 79,529 85,231 66,483 61,256
Source: Various City departments
N/A Data not available
a The City Elections department runs general elections in even-numbered years and school district elections in odd-numbered years.
Number of votes cast tend to vary between even and odd-numbered years and based on presidential election cycles.
b Daily average of water pumped from city wells, measured in thousands of gallons.
Fiscal Year
Function
132
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Public Works
Miles of streets 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224
City parking ramps 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Public Safety
Fire stations 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parks & Recreation
City parks 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Acreage of parks 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553
Park buildings 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27
Utilities
Wells 18 19 19 19 18 18 18 18 18 18
Watermain miles 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199
Sanitary sewer miles 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186
Sewer connections 14,851 14,851 13,933 13,933 13,933 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979
Arena
Ice sheets 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4
Source: Various City departments
Fiscal Year
Function
133
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
www.EdinaMN.gov
952-826-0366
Management Report
for
City of Edina, Minnesota
December 31, 2016
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
C ERTIFIED
A CCOUNTANTS
P UBLIC
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Edina, Minnesota’s
(the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016. We have organized this report into
the following sections:
Audit Summary
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
Government-Wide Financial Statements
Legislative Updates
Accounting and Auditing Updates
We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other
concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and
assistance extended to us during the course of our audit.
The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the City, management,
and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process comments resulting
from our audit process and information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. Accordingly, this report is
not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 13, 2017
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-1-
AUDIT SUMMARY
The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider
important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged
with governance of the City.
OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2016, and the related notes to the financial statements. Professional standards require that
we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related
to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally
and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate the following
information related to our audit.
PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT
We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated
in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit.
AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS
Based on our audit of the City’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016:
We have issued an unmodified opinion on the City’s basic financial statements.
We reported no deficiencies involving the City’s internal control over financial reporting that we
consider to be material weaknesses.
The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance required to be reported under
Government Auditing Standards.
We reported no findings based on our testing of the City’s compliance with Minnesota laws and
regulations.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant
accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements.
No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during
the year ended December 31, 2016. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for
which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been
recognized in the financial statements in the proper period.
-2-
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are
based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about
future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the
financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were:
Depreciation – Management’s estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
Compensated Absences – Management’s estimate is based on current rates of pay and sick leave
balances.
Net Other Post-Employment Benefit (OPEB) Liabilities – Actuarial estimates of the net other
post-employment benefit (OPEB) obligation is based on eligible participants, estimated future
health insurance premiums, and estimated retirement dates.
Pension Benefits – Actuarial estimates of net pension liabilities (assets) are calculated using
actuarial calculations that include significant assumptions, including projected changes,
investment returns, retirement ages, proportionate share, and employee turnover.
We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management to develop these estimates in
determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear.
CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the
audit, other than those that are clearly trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of
management. Where applicable, management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of
the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management, when applicable,
were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit’s financial statements taken as
a whole.
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our
audit.
DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT
For purposes of this report, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial
accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be
significant to the financial statements or the auditor’s report. We are pleased to report that no such
disagreements arose during the course of our audit.
-3-
MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS
We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management
representation letter dated June 13, 2017.
MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting
matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations. If a consultation involves
application of an accounting principle to the City’s financial statements or a determination of the type of
auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the
consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our
knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants.
OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing
standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City’s auditors. However, these
discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a
condition to our retention.
OTHER MATTERS
We applied certain limited procedures to the management’s discussion and analysis and the remaining
required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our
procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and
comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic
financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements.
We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.
We were engaged to report on the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules
accompanying the financial statements, which are not RSI. With respect to this supplementary
information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of
preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior
period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements.
We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to
prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves.
We were not engaged to report on the introductory section, the supplementary financial information, and
the statistical section which accompany the financial statements but are not RSI. Such information has not
been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and,
accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.
-4-
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City’s
governmental funds, which includes the General, special revenue, debt service, and capital project funds.
These funds are used to account for the basic services the City provides to all of its citizens, which are
financed primarily with property taxes. The governmental fund information in the City’s financial
statements focuses on budgetary compliance and the sufficiency of each governmental fund’s current
assets to finance its current liabilities.
PROPERTY TAXES
Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities.
For the 2015 fiscal year, local ad valorem property tax levies provided 39.8 percent of the total
governmental fund revenues for cities over 2,500 in population, and 35.6 percent for cities under 2,500 in
population. Property tax levies certified by Minnesota cities for 2016 increased about 4.8 percent over
2015, compared to an increase of 4.0 percent the prior year.
The total market value of property in Minnesota cities increased about 5.7 percent for the 2016 levy year.
While the percentage of market value growth was less than the 8.5 percent increase for levy year 2015, it
was considerably larger than the 1.1 percent growth experienced in levy year 2014. Market values
increased across all property categories for 2016, with gains in the market values of nonhomestead
residential properties (9.1 percent) and other properties (7.3 percent) outpacing the market value gain of
residential homestead properties (5.0 percent), commercial/industrial properties (4.9 percent), and farms
(0.1 percent). The market values used for levying property taxes are based on the previous fiscal year
(e.g., market values for taxes levied in 2016 were based on assessed values as of January 1, 2015), so the
trend of change in these market values lags somewhat behind the housing market and economy in general.
The City’s taxable market value increased 8.9 percent for taxes payable in 2015 and increased 6.1 percent
for taxes payable in 2016. The following graph shows the City’s changes in taxable market value over the
past 10 years:
$–
$1,500,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$4,500,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$7,500,000,000
$9,000,000,000
$10,500,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Taxable Market Value
-5-
Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state’s
property classification system to each property’s market value. Each property classification, such as
commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates. Consequently, a city’s total
tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the
proportion of the City’s tax base that is in each property classification from year-to-year, as well as
legislative changes to tax rates. The City’s tax capacity increased 9.1 percent and 6.6 percent for taxes
payable in 2015 and 2016, respectively.
The following graph shows the City’s change in tax capacities over the past 10 years:
$–
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
$70,000,000
$80,000,000
$90,000,000
$100,000,000
$110,000,000
$120,000,000
$130,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Local Tax Capacity
The cities’ portion of the average state-wide and metro area tax rates for 2016 both showed small
decreases from the prior year, as levy increases were offset by improvements in property tax capacities.
The following table presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for each of the last two levy
years, along with comparative state-wide and metro area rates:
Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity
2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016
Average tax rate
City 46.9 46.5 43.4 43.0 26.6 27.1
County 44.7 44.1 42.9 42.3 46.4 45.4
School 27.1 27.5 28.3 28.6 27.4 33.7
Special taxing 6.9 6.9 8.8 8.7 11.3 10.9
Total 125.6 125.0 123.4 122.6 111.7 117.2
City of EdinaMetro Area
Seven-CountyAll Cities
State-Wide
The City’s portion of the tax capacity rates for its residents has historically been well below the state-wide
and metro area averages.
-6-
GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES
The following table summarizes the changes in the fund balances of the City’s governmental funds during
the year ended December 31, 2016, presented both by fund balance classification and by fund:
Increase
2016 2015 (Decrease)
Fund balances of governmental funds
Total by classification
Nonspendable 27,643$ 529,513$ (501,870)$
Restricted 24,998,646 17,509,137 7,489,509
Assigned 14,721,678 14,675,279 46,399
Unassigned 14,433,910 11,825,799 2,608,111
Total – governmental funds 54,181,877$ 44,539,728$ 9,642,149$
Total by fund
General 17,192,311$ 14,320,383$ 2,871,928$
Housing and Redevelopment Authority 11,799,747 8,021,960 3,777,787
Debt Service 11,187,468 7,134,575 4,052,893
Construction 13,109,438 13,350,342 (240,904)
Nonmajor funds 892,913 1,712,468 (819,555)
Total – governmental funds 54,181,877$ 44,539,728$ 9,642,149$
as of December 31,
Governmental Funds Change in Fund Balance
Fund Balance
In total, the fund balances of the City’s governmental funds increased by $9,642,149 during the year
ended December 31, 2016. The significant increase in the Debt Service Fund is due to the issuance of
refunding bonds in the current year, the proceeds of which are restricted until the bonds are refunded. The
City also experienced an increase in fund balance in the General Fund and Housing and Redevelopment
Authority Fund adding to the overall increase to fund balance in 2016.
-7-
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
The following table presents the per capita revenue of the City’s governmental funds for the past
three years, along with state-wide averages.
We have included the most recent comparative state-wide averages available from the Office of the State
Auditor to provide a benchmark for interpreting the City’s data. The amounts received from the typical
major sources of governmental fund revenue will naturally vary between cities based on factors such as a
city’s stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it
provides, and other attributes. It will also differ from year-to-year due to the effect of inflation and
changes in the its operation. Also, certain data on these tables may be classified differently than how they
appear on the City’s financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state-wide information,
particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures.
We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify
unique or unusual trends and activities of your city. We intend for this type of comparative and trend
information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the management’s discussion and
analysis. An inherent difficulty in presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population
count, which for most years is based on estimates.
Year 2014 2015 2014 2015 2016
Population 20,000-100,000 20,000-100,000 50,261 50,766 50,766
Property taxes 427$ 443$ 537$ 582$ 618$
Tax increments 46 37 101 35 55
Franchise taxes 37 39 41 42 47
Special assessments 64 59 92 81 104
Licenses and permits 41 43 91 97 104
Intergovernmental revenues 166 156 79 120 114
Charges for services 90 94 85 87 92
Other 65 58 59 58 113
Total revenue 936$ 929$ 1,085$ 1,102$ 1,247$
Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
City of EdinaState-Wide
The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the
average Minnesota city, while having a lower tax rate, as shown on the table above. Property tax revenue
increased by $36 per capita, due to an increased property tax levy. Tax increment revenue increased by
$20 per capita, due to an increase in collections from the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District.
Other revenues increased by $55 per capita, due to unanticipated revenue received from a development to
be spent on affordable housing.
-8-
The expenditures of governmental funds will also vary from state-wide averages and from year-to-year,
based on the City’s circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows:
Current – These are typically the general operating type expenditures occurring on an annual
basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues.
Capital Outlay and Construction – These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more
typically fluctuating significantly from year-to-year. Many of these expenditures are
project-oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the
expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects.
Debt Service – Although the expenditures for debt service may be relatively consistent over the
term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid
through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt
may be repaid with general property taxes.
The City’s expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with
state-wide averages, are presented in the following table:
Year 2014 2015 2014 2015 2016
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 50,261 50,766 50,766
Current
87$ 89$ 152$ 125$ 134$
254 261 331 345 365
114 99 203 208 206
92 94 27 28 30
98 89 – – –
645$ 632$ 713$ 706$ 735$
Capital outlay
and construction 276$ 286$ 396$ 392$ 331$
Debt service
115$ 117$ 82$ 262$ 103$
34 33 38 47 47
149$ 150$ 120$ 309$ 150$
Interest and fiscal charges
Public safety
Streets and highways
Parks and recreation
All other
Principal
General government
City of EdinaState-Wide
Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
The City’s governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state-wide averages for
cities in the same population class. The City’s current operating costs are higher than average for public
safety service costs, which is partially caused by the City having a full-time fire department. Debt service
expenditures for 2016 were $159 per capita less than the prior year, due to less debt refunding payments
made during fiscal 2016.
-9-
GENERAL FUND
The City’s General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the
community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal
operation, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and parks and
recreation. The graph below illustrates the change in the General Fund financial position over the last
five years. We have also included a line representing annual expenditures to reflect the change in the size
of the General Fund operation over the same period.
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fund Balance $14,839,134 $14,331,635 $13,993,737 $14,320,383 $17,192,311
Cash (Net)$15,120,247 $15,923,685 $16,722,406 $15,206,793 $19,275,123
Expenditures $29,929,436 $32,196,789 $33,439,347 $34,432,954 $36,003,803
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
General Fund Financial Position
Year Ended December 31,
The City’s General Fund cash and investments balance (net of interfund borrowing) at December 31,
2016 was $19,275,123. Total fund balance at December 31, 2016 was $17,192,311, which is an increase
of $2,871,928 from the prior year, as compared to a budgeted reduction in fund balance of $804,542.
As the graph illustrates, the City has generally been able to maintain healthy cash and fund balance levels
as the volume of financial activity has grown. This is an important factor because a government, like any
organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. A healthy financial position allows the City
to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the
adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and is a factor in determining
the City’s bond rating and resulting interest costs.
A trend that is typical to Minnesota local governments, especially the General Fund of cities, is the
unusual cash flow experienced throughout the year. The City’s General Fund cash disbursements are
made fairly evenly during the year other than the impact of seasonal services such as snowplowing, street
maintenance, and park activities. Cash receipts of the General Fund are quite a different story. Taxes
comprise about 65 percent of the fund’s total annual revenue. Approximately half of these revenues are
received by the City in July and the rest in December. Consequently, the City needs to have adequate cash
reserves to finance its everyday operations between these payments.
The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned
fund balance for the General Fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned General Fund balance of
42 percent to 47 percent of the subsequent year’s budgeted tax revenue. As of December 31, 2016, the
City has $14,624,755 of unassigned fund balance in the General Fund, or 54.4 percent, of 2017 budgeted
tax revenue. This amount is $2,000,405 above the goal range identified in the policy.
-10-
The following graph reflects the City’s General Fund revenue sources for 2016 compared to budget:
Other
Charges for Services
Intergovernmental
Licenses and Permits
Taxes
General Fund Revenue
Budget Actual
General Fund revenue for 2016 was $39,580,273, which was $3,018,401 (8.3 percent) greater than
budget. Licenses and permits revenue was over budget by $1,169,774, due to a continued increase in the
number of projects during the year and an increase in the number of permits sold. Other revenue was over
budget by $1,390,845, primarily related to parkland dedication revenue that was not anticipated in the
2016 budget.
The following graph presents the City’s General Fund revenues by source for the last five years. The
graph reflects the City’s reliance on property taxes and other local sources of revenue, and shows the
virtual elimination of general state aid revenue in recent years.
Taxes Licenses and
Permits Intergovernmental Charges for
Services Fines and Forfeits Other
2012 $21,269,249 $3,126,541 $904,437 $3,651,098 $1,083,834 $2,037,490
2013 $22,006,527 $4,122,305 $1,234,425 $3,564,341 $1,017,219 $1,372,245
2014 $22,147,135 $4,490,993 $1,197,284 $4,236,442 $993,954 $2,290,609
2015 $23,678,386 $4,827,634 $1,477,694 $4,226,690 $1,033,116 $1,364,374
2016 $25,574,720 $5,192,934 $1,398,980 $4,449,894 $946,199 $2,017,546
$– $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000 $16,000,000 $18,000,000 $20,000,000 $22,000,000 $24,000,000 $26,000,000
General Fund Revenue by Source
Year Ended December 31,
Total General Fund revenue for 2016 was $2,972,379 (8.1 percent) higher than last year. Property taxes
increased $1,896,334 from the increased levy and collections. Licenses and permits increased $365,300.
These increases were for reasons previously discussed. Other revenue increased $653,172, mainly in
parkland dedication fees.
-11-
The following graph illustrates the components of General Fund spending for 2016 compared to budget:
Parks
Public Works
Public Safety
General Government
General Fund Expenditures
Budget and Actual
Budget Actual
Total General Fund expenditures for 2016 were $36,003,803, which was $658,069 (1.8 percent) under
budget. Public works expenditures were under budget by $577,315, due to less contractual services and
more hours worked in utilities than anticpated. General government expenditures were under budget by
$117,081.
The following graph presents the City’s General Fund expenditures by function for the last five years:
General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks
2012 $5,369,348 $14,738,781 $6,051,946 $3,769,361
2013 $5,883,436 $15,749,935 $6,690,986 $3,872,432
2014 $6,024,288 $16,462,293 $9,669,174 $1,283,592
2015 $5,771,748 $17,314,312 $9,981,474 $1,365,420
2016 $6,155,261 $18,408,651 $9,934,494 $1,505,397
$–
$1,500,000
$3,000,000
$4,500,000
$6,000,000
$7,500,000
$9,000,000
$10,500,000
$12,000,000
$13,500,000
$15,000,000
$16,500,000
$18,000,000
$19,500,000
General Fund Expenditures by Function
Year Ended December 31,
Total General Fund expenditures for 2016 were $1,570,849 (4.6 percent) higher than the previous year.
Public safety expenditures increased $1,094,339. This was mainly due to increased personnel
expenditures for salary increases, retiree pay, and new positions.
During 2014, the City changed the allocation of expenditures between public works and parks, which can
be seen in the graph above.
-12-
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
The City maintains a number of enterprise funds to account for services the City provides that are
financed primarily through fees charged to those utilizing the service. This section of the report provides
you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City’s enterprise funds, which include
the Utilities, Liquor, Aquatic Center, Golf Course, Arena, Art Center, Edinborough Park, Centennial
Lakes, and Sports Dome Funds.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION
The following table summarizes the changes in the financial position of the City’s enterprise funds during
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, presented both by classification and by fund:
Increase
2016 2015
(Decrease)
Net position of enterprise funds
Total by classification
Net investment in capital assets 85,158,869$ 83,395,794$ 1,763,075$
Restricted for debt service 804,393 793,664 10,729
Unrestricted 17,300,872 16,405,405 895,467
Total – enterprise funds 103,264,134$ 100,594,863$ 2,669,271$
Total by fund
Utilities 76,199,349$ 73,117,410$ 3,081,939$
Liquor 2,248,437 2,120,111 128,326
Aquatic Center 3,109,169 3,025,654 83,515
Golf Course 4,945,308 5,000,977 (55,669)
Arena 4,917,589 5,232,983 (315,394)
Nonmajor funds 11,844,282 12,097,728 (253,446)
Total – enterprise funds 103,264,134$ 100,594,863$ 2,669,271$
Enterprise Funds Change in Financial Position
Net Position
as of December 31,
In total, the net position of the City’s enterprise funds increased by $2,669,271 during the year ended
December 31, 2016. The increase is mainly due to positive operating results in the Utilities Fund.
-13-
UTILITIES FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Utilities Fund:
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $17,723,103 $17,830,425 $17,548,883 $19,334,023 $19,472,645
Oper Exp, Incl Int Exp $12,653,358 $13,873,400 $14,340,612 $15,234,135 $17,091,043
Oper Inc (Loss), After Int Exp $5,069,745 $3,957,025 $3,208,271 $4,099,888 $2,381,602
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
Utilities Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Utilities Fund ended 2015 with a net position of $76,199,349, an increase of $3,081,939 from the
prior year. Of this, $60,740,594 represents the investment in utility distribution system capital assets,
leaving $15,458,755 of unrestricted net position.
Utilities Fund operating revenue was $19,472,645 for 2016, an increase of $138,622, or 0.7 percent,
mostly due to increased rates. This increase was offset by a decrease in connection fees in 2016.
Operating expenses, including interest expense, were $17,091,043, or 12.2 percent, more than last year,
mainly due to increased depreciation expense and increased charges from the Metropolitan Council
Environmental Services during the year.
-14-
LIQUOR FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Liquor Fund:
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Sales $13,230,941 $13,711,557 $13,515,168 $12,462,387 $12,937,092
Cost of Sales $9,615,928 $9,964,763 $9,936,468 $9,415,449 $9,625,215
Oper Exp $2,124,476 $2,299,650 $2,450,384 $2,403,153 $2,505,039
Oper Inc (Loss)$1,490,537 $1,447,144 $1,128,316 $643,785 $806,838
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
Liquor Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Liquor Fund ended 2016 with a net position of $2,248,437, an increase of $128,326 from the prior
year. Of the net position balance, $1,618,176 represents the investment in liquor capital assets, leaving
$630,261 of unrestricted net position.
Liquor sales for 2016 were $12,937,092, an increase of $474,705 (3.8 percent) from the previous year.
The increase in Liquor Fund sales during the current year is due to strategies to combat increased
competition in the market place. The Liquor Fund generated a gross profit of $3,311,877 in 2016, or
25.6 percent, of gross sales. This compares to an average gross profit of 26.5 percent experienced over the
previous five years. This decline is the result of increased competition in the marketplace. Operating
expenses for 2016 were $2,505,039, which is $101,886, or 4.2 percent, higher than last year, mainly for
contractual services.
-15-
AQUATIC CENTER FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Aquatic Center Fund:
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $1,001,946 $928,055 $918,412 $971,936 $956,068
Oper Exp, Incl Int Exp $866,351 $823,472 $828,025 $873,500 $916,099
Oper Inc (Loss), After Int Exp $135,595 $104,583 $90,387 $98,436 $39,969
$–
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
$900,000
$1,000,000
$1,100,000
Aquatic Center Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Aquatic Center Fund ended 2016 with a net position of $3,109,169, an increase of $83,515 from the
prior year. Of the net position balance, $1,706,182 represents investments in Aquatic Center capital assets
and $804,393 restricted for debt service, leaving $598,594 of unrestricted net position.
Aquatic Center Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $956,068, which is $15,868 (1.6 percent) lower
than last year. Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2016, were $916,099, an increase of
$42,599 (4.9 percent) from the prior year. As the graph above illustrates, operating income was positive in
each of the five years presented.
-16-
GOLF COURSE FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Golf Course Fund:
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $3,225,591 $2,711,743 $3,229,348 $2,857,190 $2,809,702
Oper Exp, Incl Int Exp $3,292,745 $3,199,962 $3,343,376 $2,943,614 $3,059,216
Oper Inc (Loss), After Int Exp $(67,154) $(488,219) $(114,028) $(86,424) $(249,514)
$(600,000)
$(300,000)
$–
$300,000
$600,000
$900,000
$1,200,000
$1,500,000
$1,800,000
$2,100,000
$2,400,000
$2,700,000
$3,000,000
$3,300,000
$3,600,000
Golf Course Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Golf Course Fund ended 2016 with a net position of $4,945,308, a decrease of $55,669 from the prior
year. Of this, $5,801,342 represents the investment in golf course land and capital assets, leaving a deficit
($856,034) of unrestricted net position.
Golf Course Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $2,809,702, which is $47,488 (1.7 percent) less than
the previous year, mainly due to the 27-hole course being closed in July 2016 to begin reconstruction.
Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2016, were $3,059,216, up $115,602 from the prior
year, mainly in personal costs.
Management planned to support the operations of this fund in the current year by making transfers from
other funds. The transfer from the Liquor Fund totaled $150,000.
-17-
ARENA FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Arena Fund:
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $1,452,435 $1,942,971 $2,091,685 $2,307,985 $2,314,759
Oper Exp, Incl Int Exp $2,181,136 $2,272,494 $2,375,157 $2,642,081 $2,842,644
Oper Inc (Loss), After Int Exp $(728,701) $(329,523) $(283,472) $(334,096) $(527,885)
$(800,000)
$(400,000)
$–
$400,000
$800,000
$1,200,000
$1,600,000
$2,000,000
$2,400,000
$2,800,000
$3,200,000
Arena Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Arena Fund ended 2016 with a net position of $4,917,589, a decrease of $315,394 from the prior
year. Of this, $5,327,059 represents the investment in arena capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($409,470)
of unrestricted net position.
Arena Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $2,314,759, $6,774 more than last year. This increase
mostly relates to additional building rental in 2016. Operating expenses, including interest expense, for
2016 were $2,842,644, an increase of $200,563 from the prior year, mainly in personal services and
depreciation. As the graph above illustrates, the operating loss increased from the previous year, with an
increase in the loss of $193,789.
As the graph above illustrates, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has
been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from other funds on an annual basis.
These transfers included $200,000 in fiscal 2016 from the Liquor Fund.
The Construction Fund also made a transfer of $9,861 to the Arena Fund in fiscal 2016 to reimburse the
fund for debt proceeds initially received in the Construction Fund for capital projects at the facility.
-18-
ART CENTER FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Art Center Fund:
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $441,941 $467,021 $480,882 $516,429 $486,229
Oper Exp $617,577 $607,649 $654,310 $673,583 $727,822
Oper Inc (Loss)$(175,636) $(140,628) $(173,428) $(157,154) $(241,593)
$(300,000)
$(200,000)
$(100,000)
$–
$100,000
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
$600,000
$700,000
$800,000
Art Center Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Art Center Fund ended 2016 with a net position deficit of ($5,551), a decrease of $98,685 from the
prior year. Of this, $90,471 represents the investment in capital assets, leaving a deficit ($96,022) of
unrestricted net position.
Art Center Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $486,229, $30,200 less than the prior year. Operating
expenses for 2016 were $727,822, which increased $54,239 from the prior year.
As the graph above illustrates, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has
been supporting the operations of this fund by making an annual transfer from the Liquor Fund and a
project-specific transfer from the Environmental Efficiency Capital Project Fund. These transfers totaled
$116,850 in fiscal 2016.
-19-
EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Edinborough Park Fund:
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $1,243,453 $1,423,056 $1,325,608 $1,336,873 $1,366,418
Oper Exp $1,355,285 $1,415,094 $1,340,243 $1,394,373 $1,443,272
Oper Inc (Loss)$(111,832) $7,962 $(14,635) $(57,500) $(76,854)
$(200,000)
$–
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
Edinborough Park Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Edinborough Park Fund ended 2016 with a net position of $2,419,280, a decrease of $34,516 from
the prior year. Of this, $1,115,466 represents the net investment in capital assets, leaving $1,303,814 of
unrestricted net position.
Edinborough Park Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $1,366,418, which was $29,545, or
2.2 percent, more than fiscal year 2015. Operating expenses also increased $48,899, or 3.5 percent, from
fiscal year 2015.
-20-
CENTENNIAL LAKES FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Centennial Lakes Fund:
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $713,696 $735,556 $758,893 $801,023 $939,421
Oper Exp $869,277 $944,372 $966,266 $971,777 $1,011,551
Oper Inc (Loss)$(155,581) $(208,816) $(207,373) $(170,754) $(72,130)
$(250,000)
$–
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,250,000
Centennial Lakes Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Centennial Lakes Fund ended 2016 with a net position of $681,085, an increase of $22,711 from the
prior year. Of this, $251,450 represents the net investment in capital assets, leaving $429,635 of
unrestricted net position.
Centennial Lakes Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $939,421, which was $138,398, or 17.3 percent,
higher than the prior year. Operating expenses increased $39,774, or 4.1 percent.
SPORTS DOME FUND
The Sports Dome Fund was established by the City starting in fiscal 2014 and began limited operations in
late 2014. Of the $8,749,468 total fund balance at year-end, $8,508,129 represents the investment in
capital assets, leaving $241,339 of unrestricted net position.
The Sports Dome Fund had operating revenues for 2016 of $398,707 and operating expenses of
$670,446, which were higher than the prior year, due to increased depreciation from the capitalization of
the Sports Dome.
During 2016, the City made a transfer from the Construction Fund in the amount of $124,669 to the
Sports Dome Fund to reimburse the fund for debt proceeds initially received in the Construction Fund for
capital projects at the facility.
-21-
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In addition to fund-based information, the current reporting model for governmental entities also requires
the inclusion of two government-wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City
as a single, unified entity. These government-wide financial statements provide information on the total
cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long-term liabilities.
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
The Statement of Net Position essentially tells you what your city owns and owes at a given point in time,
the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net position represents the resources the City has leftover to
use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable
form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, net position is
divided into three components: net investment in capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted.
The following table presents the components of the City’s net position as of December 31, 2016 and
2015, for governmental activities and business-type activities:
Increase
2016 2015 (Decrease)
Net position
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets 93,247,973$ 85,838,618$ 7,409,355$
Restricted 20,892,680 16,925,171 3,967,509
Unrestricted 22,146,168 21,957,830 188,338
Total governmental activities 136,286,821 124,721,619 11,565,202
Business-type activities
Net investment in capital assets 85,158,869 83,395,794 1,763,075
Restricted 804,393 793,664 10,729
Unrestricted 17,300,872 16,405,405 895,467
Total business-type activities 103,264,134 100,594,863 2,669,271
Total net position 239,550,955$ 225,316,482$ 14,234,473$
As of December 31,
The City’s total net position at December 31, 2016 was $14.2 million higher than the previous year-end.
Of the increase, $11.5 million came from governmental activities and $2.7 million came from
business-type activities. Net investment in capital assets increased in both the governmental activities and
business-type activities due to significant capital projects occurring in the fiscal year. The increase in
restricted net position in the governmental activities relates to the increase in restricted assets from the
issuance of refunding bonds in 2016 and the improved operating results in the Housing and
Redevelopment Fund in the current year. The increase in the unrestricted net position in the governmental
activities relates to positive operating results in the General Fund in 2016. The increase in unrestricted net
position in the business-type activities relates to positive operating results in the Utilities Fund.
-22-
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
The Statement of Activities tracks the City’s yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other
transactions that increase or reduce total net position. These amounts represent the full cost of providing
services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of
cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund-based financial statements. This statement includes the
cost of supplies used, depreciation of long-lived capital assets, and other accrual-based expenses.
The following table presents the change in net position of the City for the years ended December 31, 2016
and 2015:
2015
Program
Expenses Revenues Net ChangeNet Change
Net (expense) revenue
Governmental activities
General government 9,587,567$ 4,630,855$ (4,956,712)$ (5,603,492)$
Public safety 20,243,209 10,306,807 (9,936,402) (9,439,471)
Public works 19,444,472 12,235,316 (7,209,156) (5,424,940)
Parks and recreation 3,822,716 2,570,203 (1,252,513) (1,897,890)
Interest on long-term debt 2,133,474 – (2,133,474) (2,180,678)
Business-type activities
Utilities 16,780,474 19,851,002 3,070,528 4,582,312
Liquor 12,130,254 12,948,442 818,188 650,106
Aquatic center 915,560 986,068 70,508 98,976
Golf course 3,041,169 2,826,684 (214,485) (504,022)
Arena 2,842,660 2,317,405 (525,255) (269,074)
Community activity centers 3,853,091 3,230,297 (622,794) (42,190)
Total net (expense) revenue 94,794,646$ 71,903,079$ (22,891,567) (20,030,363)
General revenues
Property taxes and tax increments 34,175,518 31,424,968
Franchise and lodging taxes 2,369,047 2,111,754
Unrestricted investment earnings 480,485 287,527
Gain on disposal of capital assets 100,990 81,327
Total general revenues 37,126,040 33,905,576
14,234,473 13,875,213
Net position – beginning 225,316,482 211,441,269
Net position – ending 239,550,955$ 225,316,482$
2016
Change in net position
One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the
way the City’s governmental and business-type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the
dependence of the City’s governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and
unrestricted grants. It also shows if the City’s business-type activities are generating sufficient program
revenues (service charges and program-specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the
current downward pressures on the general revenue sources.
-23-
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES
The 2016 legislative session, falling in the second half of the state’s fiscal biennium, was scheduled to be
a short session lasting only 11 weeks. Since biennial budgets are adopted in odd-year legislative sessions,
less time is usually needed for the even-year sessions. However, because the 2015 Legislature adjourned
without passing funding bills in several significant areas, it was anticipated that the 2016 legislative
session would be considerably more active than the typical short session. In spite of this, only a few
funding bills were brought forth to the Governor by the end of the 2016 regular legislative session,
including a supplemental budget bill and an omnibus tax bill. The Governor chose not to sign the tax bill
due to a drafting error that would have resulted in an unintended reduction of state revenues. When the
framework for a special session could not be agreed upon, the fiscal year ended without the adoption of a
new tax bill, capital bonding bill, or transportation funding package.
The following is a summary of recent legislation affecting Minnesota cities:
Border-to-Border Broadband Grants – The 2016 supplemental budget act appropriated
$35 million in fiscal 2017 for a Border-to-Border Broadband Grant Program. The grants, available
through the Office of Broadband Development in the Department of Employment and Economic
Development (DEED), provide funding to help communities meet state goals for the development of
state-wide high-speed broadband access, focusing on areas currently considered to be underserved or
with a high concentration of low-income households.
Equity-Related Programs and Grants – The 2016 supplemental budget act also appropriated
$35 million in fiscal 2017 for the financing of equity-related programs through DEED, the majority of
which was allocated for programs and grants for communities of color, people with disabilities,
seniors, and youth.
Sales Tax Exemption – Effective January 1, 2017, the sales tax exemption on the purchase of goods
or services enacted for cities in 2014 is expanded to include all special districts; city, county, or
township instrumentalities; economic development authorities; housing and redevelopment
authorities; and all joint power boards or organizations.
Taxes Covered Under Debt Management Services – Amendments were made to the statutes
governing debt management and debt settlement services to clarify the status of delinquent taxes
owed to Minnesota local governments and political subdivisions as debt with regard to those services,
and include those entities as creditors for the purpose of debt management services.
Elections – An omnibus elections law was passed making several changes to elections administration
requirements. In addition to establishing a presidential primary to take the place of the current caucus
system beginning in 2020, the law modified election procedures in a number of areas, including:
absentee balloting, voting station dimensions, election canvassing, candidate filing, the extension of
polling hours to accommodate voters in line at closing, and emergency election plans.
Police-Worn Body Cameras – A number of new laws were enacted related to portable recording
systems (police-worn body cameras) and the data derived from their use, addressing: data retention
and destruction, permitted uses of the systems, audits of the data, and vendor practices. Among the
changes are a requirement for gathering public input before purchasing or implementing the use of
portable recording systems, and requirements for the adoption and dissemination of written policies
over the use of portable recording systems.
Veteran Preference Act – New language was added to state statutes clarifying that Minnesota cities
and towns may require a veteran to complete an initial probationary period when hired.
-24-
Charitable Gambling – Cities that require charitable gambling organizations to contribute
10 percent of their net profits to the city for charitable purposes are now required to acknowledge the
source of the funds, either in communications about the receipt or distribution of the funds.
Donation of Surplus Equipment – Local governments are now permitted to donate surplus public
works equipment, cell phones, or emergency medical and firefighting equipment to nonprofit
organizations. The donation of surplus equipment was added to the list of exceptions to municipal tort
liability. Prior to making any such donations, a city must adopt a policy on how it will determine what
equipment is considered surplus and eligible for donation and how it will determine which nonprofit
organizations will receive such donations. The policy must address the city’s obligation to disclose
that the donated equipment may be defective and cannot be relied upon for safety.
Temporary Family Health Care Housing Permits – A new special land use permit system was
established for a specific type of mobile health care-related mobile housing, intended to provide
transitional housing for seniors. Cities will be required to implement the new permit system unless
they officially act to opt out of the program. The program sets forth requirements for structure and
placement, the permit process and duration, applicants, inspections, and the process for opting out.
Partition Fence Viewing Exemption – Cities now have the authority to pass a resolution to exempt
adjoining owners or occupants from the partition fence law when their land is considered to be less
than 20 acres combined, thereby relieving the city of the responsibility of participating in a potentially
costly “fence-viewing” process to mediate disputes between adjoining landowners required to share
the costs of constructing fences.
-25-
ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES
GASB STATEMENT NO. 73, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR PENSIONS AND RELATED
ASSETS THAT ARE NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF GASB STATEMENT 68, AND AMENDMENTS TO
CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF GASB STATEMENTS 67 AND 68
This statement extends the approach to accounting and financial reporting established in GASB Statement
No. 68 to all pensions, including those not administered through a trust. Governmental employers
participating in such plans will be required to report the total of any unfunded pension liability related to
the plan in their accrual basis financial statements, rather than the net pension liability. The requirements
of this statement that address accounting and financial reporting by employers and governmental
nonemployer contributing entities for pensions not within the scope of GASB Statement No. 68, are
effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016.
This statement also clarified the application of certain provisions of GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68
regarding 10-year schedules of required supplementary information (RSI) and other recognition issues
pertaining to employers and nonemployer contributing entities effective for financial statements for fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2015.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 74, FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFIT PLANS OTHER
THAN PENSION PLANS
This statement establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for other
post-employment benefits (OPEB) plans, replacing GASB Statement Nos. 43 and 57. It also includes
requirements for defined contribution OPEB plans that replace the requirements for those OPEB plans in
GASB Statement Nos. 25, 43, and 50.
This statement will improve financial reporting primarily through enhanced note disclosures and
schedules of RSI that will be presented by OPEB plans administered through trusts meeting the specified
criteria. The new information will enhance the decision-usefulness of the financial reports of those OPEB
plans, their value for assessing accountability, and their transparency by providing information about
measures of net OPEB liabilities and explanations of how and why those liabilities changed from
year-to-year. The net OPEB liability information, including ratios, will offer an up-to-date indication of
the extent to which the total OPEB liability is covered by the fiduciary net position of the OPEB plan.
The comparability of the reported information for similar types of OPEB plans will be improved by the
changes related to the attribution method used to determine the total OPEB liability. The contribution
schedule will provide measures to evaluate decisions related to the assessment of contribution rates in
comparison with actuarially determined rates, if such rates are determined. In addition, new information
about rates of return on OPEB plan investments will inform financial report users about the effects of
market conditions on the OPEB plan’s assets over time and provide information for users to assess the
relative success of the OPEB plan’s investment strategy and the relative contribution that investment
earnings provide to the OPEB plan’s ability to pay benefits to plan members when they come due.
This statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2016. Earlier
application is encouraged.
-26-
GASB STATEMENT NO. 75, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than
Pensions, establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for governments whose
employees are provided with OPEB, as well as for certain nonemployer governments that have a legal
obligation to provide financial support for OPEB provided to the employees of other entities. This
statement replaces the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 45 and 57.
This statement establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of
resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures. Similar to changes implemented for
pensions, this statement requires the liability of employers and nonemployer contributing entities to
employees for defined benefit OPEB (net OPEB liability) to be measured as the portion of the present
value of projected benefit payments to be provided to current active and inactive employees that is
attributed to those employees’ past periods of service (total OPEB liability), less the amount of the OPEB
plan’s fiduciary net position. Note disclosure and RSI requirements about defined benefit OPEB also are
addressed.
This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Earlier application is
encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 80, BLENDING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN COMPONENT UNITS—AN
AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENT NO. 14
The objective of this statement is to clarify the financial statement presentation requirements for certain
component units. This statement amends the blending requirements for the financial statement
presentation of component units of all state and local governments. The additional criterion requires
blending of a component unit incorporated as a not-for-profit corporation in which the primary
government is the sole corporate member. The additional criterion does not apply to component units
included in the financial reporting entity pursuant to the provisions of GASB Statement No. 39,
Determining Whether Certain Organizations Are Component Units—an amendment of GASB Statement
No. 14.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016.
Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 81, IRREVOCABLE SPLIT-INTEREST AGREEMENTS
This statement provides recognition and measurement guidance for the accounting and financial reporting
of irrevocable split-interest agreements by governments that are the beneficiary of such an agreement.
Split-interest agreements are a type of giving agreement used by donors to provide resources to two or
more beneficiaries, including governments.
This statement requires that a government that receives resources pursuant to an irrevocable split-interest
agreement (1) recognize assets, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources at the inception of the
agreement, (2) recognize assets representing its beneficial interests in irrevocable split-interest agreements
that are administered by a third party if the government controls the present service capacity of the
beneficial interests, and (3) recognize revenue when the resources become applicable to the reporting
period.
The requirements of this statement are effective for financial statements for periods beginning after
December 15, 2016, and should be applied retroactively. Earlier application is encouraged.
-27-
GASB STATEMENT NO. 82, PENSION ISSUES—AN AMENDMENT OF GASB STATEMENTS NO. 67,
NO. 68, AND NO. 73
The intent of this statement is to address certain issues raised with respect to GASB Statement Nos. 67,
68, and 73.
This statement amends GASB Statement Nos. 67 and 68, changing the definition of “covered payroll”
utilized in schedules of RSI from the payroll of employees that are provided with pensions through the
pension plan, to the payroll on which contributions to a pension plan are based. It clarifies that a
deviation, as the term is used in Actuarial Standards of Practice, is not considered to be in conformity
with the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 67, 68, or 73 for the selection of assumptions used in
determining the total pension liability and related measures. It also clarifies that payments made by an
employer to satisfy contribution requirements that are identified by the pension plan terms as plan
member contribution requirements should be classified as plan member contributions for purposes of
Statement No. 67 and as employee contributions for purposes of Statement No. 68, and requires that an
employer’s expense and expenditures for those amounts be recognized in the period for which the
contribution is assessed and classified in the same manner as the employer classifies similar compensation
other than pensions.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016,
except for the requirements of this statement for the selection of assumptions in a circumstance in which
an employer’s pension liability is measured as of a date other than the employer’s most recent fiscal
year-end. In that circumstance, the requirements for the selection of assumptions are effective for that
employer in the first reporting period in which the measurement date of the pension liability is on or after
June 15, 2017. Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 83, CERTAIN ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
This statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations
(ARO), which are legally enforceable liabilities associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset.
This statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a
corresponding deferred outflow of resources for ARO. A government that has legal obligations to perform
future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability when it is
both incurred and reasonably estimable. The measurement of an ARO is required to be based on the best
estimate of the current value of outlays expected to be incurred, and a deferred outflow of resources
associated with an ARO is required to be measured at the amount of the corresponding liability upon
initial measurement.
This statement requires the current value of a government’s AROs to be adjusted for the effects of general
inflation or deflation at least annually, and a government to evaluate all relevant factors at least annually
to determine whether the effects of one or more of the factors are expected to significantly change the
estimated asset retirement outlays. A government should remeasure an ARO only when the result of the
evaluation indicates there is a significant change in the estimated outlays. Deferred outflows of resources
should be reduced and recognized as outflows of resources in a systematic and rational manner over the
estimated useful life of the tangible capital asset.
If a government owns a minority interest in a jointly owned tangible asset where a nongovernmental
entity is the majority owner or has operational responsibility for the jointly owned asset, the government’s
minority share of an ARO should be reported using the measurement produced by the nongovernmental
majority owner or the nongovernmental minority owner that has operational responsibility, without
adjustment to conform to the liability measurement and recognition requirements of this statement.
-28-
The statement also requires disclosures of any funding or financial assurance requirements a government
has related to the performance of asset retirement activities, along with any assets restricted for the
payment of the government’s AROs. This statement also requires disclosure of information about the
nature of a government’s AROs, the methods and assumptions used for the estimates of the liabilities, and
the estimated remaining useful life of the associated tangible capital assets. If an ARO (or portions
thereof) has been incurred by a government but is not yet recognized because it is not reasonably
estimable, the government is required to disclose that fact and the reasons therefor. This statement
requires similar disclosures for a government’s minority shares of AROs.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2018.
Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 84, FIDUCIARY ACTIVITIES
This statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments.
The focus of the criteria generally is on (1) whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary
activity and (2) the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included
to identify fiduciary component units and postemployment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary
activities.
An activity meeting the criteria should be reported in a fiduciary fund in the basic financial statements,
which should present a statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net
position. This statement describes four fiduciary funds that should be reported, if applicable: (1) pension
(and other employee benefit) trust funds, (2) investment trust funds, (3) private-purpose trust funds, and
(4) custodial funds. Custodial funds generally should report fiduciary activities that are not held in a trust
or equivalent arrangement that meets specific criteria.
A fiduciary component unit, when reported in the fiduciary fund financial statements of a primary
government, should combine its information with its component units that are fiduciary component units
and aggregate that combined information with the primary government’s fiduciary funds.
This statement also provides for recognition of a liability to the beneficiaries in a fiduciary fund when an
event has occurred that compels the government to disburse fiduciary resources, defined as when a
demand for the resources has been made or when no further action, approval, or condition is required to
be taken or met by the beneficiary to release the assets.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.
Earlier application is encouraged.
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Purpose Audit Reports
Year Ended
December 31, 2016
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Page
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial
Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 1–2
Independent Auditor’s Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 3
Table of Contents
CITY OF EDINA
Year Ended December 31, 2016
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
C ERTIFIED
A CCOUNTANTS
P UBLIC
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
-1-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of
the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related
notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and
have issued our report thereon dated June 13, 2017.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control
over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do
not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or
detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination
of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the City’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A
significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less
severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this
section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses
may exist that have not been identified.
(continued)
-2-
COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free from
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those
provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The
results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be
reported under Government Auditing Standards.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance
and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal
control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly,
this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 13, 2017
C ERTIFIED
A CCOUNTANTS
P UBLIC
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
-3-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of
the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and the related
notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and
have issued our report thereon dated June 13, 2017.
MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding,
deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements,
miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the listed categories.
In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to
comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities. However, our
audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had
we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City’s
noncompliance with the above referenced provisions.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of
that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any
other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 13, 2017
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF EDINA
AUDIT REPORT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016
James H. Eichten, CPA
Opinion on Financial Statements
Financial statements are fairly presented in
accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America
Internal Controls and Compliance
Proper internal controls over financial reporting
Compliance with laws and regulations related to
financial reporting
State Laws and Regulations
Compliance with Minnesota state laws and
regulations
Single Audit of Federal Awards
Not required for 2016
AUDITOR’S ROLE
Opinion on Financial Statements
Unmodified or “clean” opinion
Internal Controls and Compliance
No findings
State Laws and Regulations
No findings
AUDIT RESULTS
Audit Summary
Planned scope and timing of audit
Formal required communications
MANAGEMENT REPORT
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$1,500,000,000
$3,000,000,000
$4,500,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$7,500,000,000
$9,000,000,000
$10,500,000,000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Taxable Market Value
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Tax Rates
Rates expressed as a percentage of net tax capacity
2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016
Average tax rate
City 46.9 46.5 43.4 43.0 26.6 27.1
County 44.7 44.1 42.9 42.3 46.4 45.4
School 27.1 27.5 28.3 28.6 27.4 33.7
Special taxing 6.9 6.9 8.8 8.7 11.3 10.9
Total 125.6 125.0 123.4 122.6 111.7 117.2
City of EdinaMetro Area
Seven-CountyAll Cities
State-Wide
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Year 2014 2015 2014 2015 2016
Population 20,000-100,000 20,000-100,000 50,261 50,766 50,766
Property taxes 427$ 443$ 537$ 582$ 618$
Tax increments 46 37 101 35 55
Franchise taxes 37 39 41 42 47
Special assessments 64 59 92 81 104
Licenses and permits 41 43 91 97 104
Intergovernmental revenues 166 156 79 120 114
Charges for services 90 94 85 87 92
Other 65 58 59 58 113
Total revenue 936$ 929$ 1,085$ 1,102$ 1,247$
Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
City of EdinaState-Wide
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Year 2014 2015 2014 2015 2016
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 50,261 50,766 50,766
Current
87$ 89$ 152$ 125$ 134$
254 261 331 345 365
114 99 203 208 206
92 94 27 28 30
98 89 – – –
645$ 632$ 713$ 706$ 735$
Capital outlay
and construction 276$ 286$ 396$ 392$ 331$
Debt service
115$ 117$ 82$ 262$ 103$
34 33 38 47 47
149$ 150$ 120$ 309$ 150$
Interest and fiscal charges
Public safety
Streets and highways
Parks and recreation
All other
Principal
General government
City of EdinaState-Wide
Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Fund Balance $14,839,134 $14,331,635 $13,993,737 $14,320,383 $17,192,311
Cash (Net)$15,120,247 $15,923,685 $16,722,406 $15,206,793 $19,275,123
Expenditures $29,929,436 $32,196,789 $33,439,347 $34,432,954 $36,003,803
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
General Fund Financial Position
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Taxes Licenses and
Permits Intergovernmental Charges for
Services Fines and Forfeits Other
2012 $21,269,249 $3,126,541 $904,437 $3,651,098 $1,083,834 $2,037,490
2013 $22,006,527 $4,122,305 $1,234,425 $3,564,341 $1,017,219 $1,372,245
2014 $22,147,135 $4,490,993 $1,197,284 $4,236,442 $993,954 $2,290,609
2015 $23,678,386 $4,827,634 $1,477,694 $4,226,690 $1,033,116 $1,364,374
2016 $25,574,720 $5,192,934 $1,398,980 $4,449,894 $946,199 $2,017,546
$– $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000 $16,000,000 $18,000,000 $20,000,000 $22,000,000 $24,000,000 $26,000,000
General Fund Revenue by Source
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks
2012 $5,369,348 $14,738,781 $6,051,946 $3,769,361
2013 $5,883,436 $15,749,935 $6,690,986 $3,872,432
2014 $6,024,288 $16,462,293 $9,669,174 $1,283,592
2015 $5,771,748 $17,314,312 $9,981,474 $1,365,420
2016 $6,155,261 $18,408,651 $9,934,494 $1,505,397
$–
$1,500,000
$3,000,000
$4,500,000
$6,000,000
$7,500,000
$9,000,000
$10,500,000
$12,000,000
$13,500,000
$15,000,000
$16,500,000
$18,000,000
$19,500,000
General Fund Expenditures by Function
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $17,723,103 $17,830,425 $17,548,883 $19,334,023 $19,472,645
Oper Exp, Incl Int Exp $12,653,358 $13,873,400 $14,340,612 $15,234,135 $17,091,043
Oper Inc (Loss), After Int Exp $5,069,745 $3,957,025 $3,208,271 $4,099,888 $2,381,602
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
Utilities Fund
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Sales $13,230,941 $13,711,557 $13,515,168 $12,462,387 $12,937,092
Cost of Sales $9,615,928 $9,964,763 $9,936,468 $9,415,449 $9,625,215
Oper Exp $2,124,476 $2,299,650 $2,450,384 $2,403,153 $2,505,039
Oper Inc (Loss)$1,490,537 $1,447,144 $1,128,316 $643,785 $806,838
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
Liquor Fund
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Oper Rev $3,225,591 $2,711,743 $3,229,348 $2,857,190 $2,809,702
Oper Exp, Incl Int Exp $3,292,745 $3,199,962 $3,343,376 $2,943,614 $3,059,216
Oper Inc (Loss), After Int Exp $(67,154)$(488,219)$(114,028)$(86,424)$(249,514)
$(600,000)
$(300,000)
$–
$300,000
$600,000
$900,000
$1,200,000
$1,500,000
$1,800,000
$2,100,000
$2,400,000
$2,700,000
$3,000,000
$3,300,000
$3,600,000
Golf Course Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
Legislative Updates
Accounting and Auditing Updates
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Clean Opinion on Basic Financial Statements
No Findings in Internal Controls and
Compliance Testing and Minnesota Legal
Compliance
City is experiencing Continued Improvement in
Overall Financial Results
Noted Continued Ongoing Assessment of
Financial Projections and Results, Including
General, Other Operational, and Enterprise
Fund Activities
Financial Records in Excellent Condition
SUMMARY
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Kaylin Eid s ness, S enio r C ommunic atio ns
C oordinator Item Activity:
Subject:May "S p eak Up , Ed ina" P res entatio n Info rmatio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
N o action requested.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
S ince J une 2012, the C ity of E dina has used the online engagement website, S peakU pE dina.org, to collect ideas
and opinions from residents. S ince J anuary 2014, organized monthly discussions have been held on the site.
Water sources vary from ground and surface water, and can be supplied by the C ity or from private wells for
drinking, cleaning, sanitation, irrigation and more. I n the Twin C ities metro area, approximately 20 percent of all
treated drinking water is used outdoors, with a majority of this being used on lawns and landscapes. According to
a U niversity of M innesota E xtension and M etropolitan C ouncil study, water use in the summer months is nearly
three times greater than water use in the winter.
T he City has an odd-even sprinkling ordinance to conserve water. Homes with even-numbered addresses may
water their lawns before 11 a.m. or after 5 p.m. on even-numbered dates of the week. H omes with odd-
numbered addresses may water before 11 a.m. or after 5 p.m. on odd-numbered dates.
I n last month's discussion, the C ity asked the following questions:
How do you conserve water at your home, apartment or work?
W hat challenges do you face when trying to conserve water?
How can the C ity encourage water conservation?
Weather is becoming more extreme; heavy rains and long hot droughts can make managing turf a
challenge. W hat alternatives to traditional lawns and lawn care practices have you implemented? W hat
would you be willing to try?
T he discussion was open for comments M ay 1-31. D uring that time, 476 users visited the site 1,538 times. 22.6
percent of the visitors during this month's discussion have visited the site in the past. All commenters in this
discussion were from E dina. O ver the course of the discussion, 33 comments were made on our site.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Water Cons ervation Dis cus s ion
PPT: May Speak Up Pres entation
Water Conservation
Closed May 31, 2017 · Discussion · 14 Participants · 4 Topics · 33 Answers · 5 Replies · 13 Votes
14 4 33 5 13
PARTICIPANTS TOPICS ANSWERS REPLIES VOTES
SUMMARY OF TOPICS
ACTIONS TO CONSERVE WATER 11 Answers · 2 Replies
How do you conserve water at your home, apartment or work?
John Traul · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 05, 2017 12:40 pm
1 Votes
I turn the sprinkler off when it rains.
Response:
Adam R. · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 06, 2017 1:32 am
Seriously? That's jokes, huh? Tell me if you at least bother to ensure your sprinkler is
not watering the driveway or street, like so many you see.
Betsy Weiner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 05, 2017 10:14 pm
1 Votes
I found this website to be really helpful www.changethecourse.us You can calculate your
water footprint, and learn how to conserve. Plus, you can make a pledge and companies
will pay to restore water to threatened eco-systems.
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 05, 2017 10:17 pm
0 Votes
To conserve water, we do several things: 1.) Seldom use the dishwasher; wash dishes in
the sink, as our family did when I was growing up. Occasional use is to keep it from
drying out and leaking. When using the dishwasher, pre-wash dishes the shortest time is
sufficient. I don't use the heater element to conserve electricity; dishes air-dry quickly
when hot).
2. Use "low flow" shower head.
3. Turn shower off when shampooing hair, then on again to rinse.
4. Never stand in shower just because "it feels good" (though tempted).
5. In and out as quickly as possible.
6. Re-use water from clothes washer to clean shower and drain (requires carrying
buckets of water from basement to main floor).
7. Never water lawns; mow frequently. Our yard has dandelions and Creeping Charlie,
1 of 8 Full Report
Water Conservation
Closed May 31, 2017 · Discussion · 14 Participants · 4 Topics · 33 Answers · 5 Replies · 13 Votes
but is green and looks cared for. Several neighbors do the same. No complaints. We
value conserving water over green, weed-free lawns.
Adam R. · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 06, 2017 1:31 am
1 Votes
Judith, I love everything you're saying - being thoughtful about saving water is admirable
and important and you give some great specific tips. But the jury is still out on the
dishwasher versus hand washing issue. If you run a fairly full or full dishwasher and
especially if it's energy star rated, it seems it can save some water and energy overall.
It's pretty subjective and results can vary widely depending on practices (see link below
as a quick starting point for investigation), but I think the main point is to be mindful of
best practices when hand washing, using a dishwasher or some combo of the above.
https://www.treehugger.com/kitchen-design/built-in-dishwashers-vs-hand-washing-which-
is-greener.html
Response:
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 06, 2017 8:55 pm
Thank you, Adam. I did go to "treehugger" as well as Betsy's referral of "Change the
Course", and I've learned a lot. I now understand that whether running the dishwasher
or washing by hand is more saving of water, depends on variables such as how you
wash and rinse dishes and how often, as well as the dishwasher. I like to wash by
hand, because I like the feel of the warm water. I put about 2" of water in the sink, let
the dishes soak a bit, clean them with a soft plastic scrubber, turn on faucet to rinse
one dish, and immediately turn off faucet. Put rinsed dish in dishwasher to drain and
air-dry. Repeat this process until all dishes are clean, rinsed, and drying in dishwasher.
Pots and pans are soaked first, then given the same treatment.
I've seen people hand wash dishes, letting the faucet water run continuously as they
do them. That seems as wasteful as letting the water run while brushing teeth. Using
water to rinse the brush (or dish) is all that's needed. I think the amount of water I use
to hand wash dishes may be equivalent to the amount used in one of the newer
dishwashers, but of course the dishwasher uses more energy, especially when also
used for drying the dishes.
Thanks again for the referral to "treehugger". Some of the practices mentioned there
save more water than what I do.
Susan Tucker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 06, 2017 9:16 am
1 Votes
We follow many of the steps outlined by Judith, except step 6. We only run our
dishwasher when it is completely full.
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 18, 2017 5:22 pm
0 Votes
Save huge amounts of clean water by cutting way back on buying and eating meat. It
takes a lot of water to grow a pound of beef. We'd be astonished to see the statistics. Go
2 of 8 Full Report
Water Conservation
Closed May 31, 2017 · Discussion · 14 Participants · 4 Topics · 33 Answers · 5 Replies · 13 Votes
to: www.changethecourse.us
Most of the world's population can't eat meat because the price is too high, and it is. We
tend to think the price is what we pay at the grocery store, but the "hidden" price is far
more than that. We owe it to the children to educate ourselves (and them) to the actual
cost.
My parents were former "farm kids" who grew up taking meat for granted, and I was
taught we had to have meat to be healthy. Nope. We don't. In fact we're healthier
without it.
It was hard for me to give it up because I liked the taste, but I weaned myself gradually,
over a period of years...quit buying beef first, then pork, then chicken. Had a "meatless"
day, then gradually increased the number of meatless days. Now, 30 years after I first
began the process, I very seldom eat any meat (I vowed never to say "never"). In fact, I
find it disgusting as I recall scenes from "Food Inc" where animals are treated as though
they are without feelings, and are abused as "pieces of meat" while still living. When we
pay for that "pound of flesh" we're paying people to abuse animals. What does that
make us? We could pay a little extra and buy organic.
But now we're talking about clean water. Even organically raised cattle and pigs need to
eat, and what they eat takes more water than we could ever imagine. Google it.
P.S. I'm now 80 (about 25 years without meat) and am very healthy.
amy frerker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 24, 2017 7:51 am
0 Votes
We moved into a house w a sprinkler system but we never use it. We are completely fine
w our lawn getting a little brown. We have low-flow fixtures, use the dishwasher (and
only run it when full) for washing our dishes, and have a front-loading washing machine.
We also take our kids to public pools rather than filling up a kiddie pool at home.
amy frerker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 24, 2017 7:52 am
0 Votes
Oh, and we minimize the amount of meat we eat!
Neil Johnson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 24, 2017 1:48 pm
0 Votes
Has anyone tried longrooted grass such as Pearl's grass seed? Longrooted grass is 12"-
14" deep compared to regular grass which is 3-4" deep. This makes it more drought
tolerant and grows slower (need to only mow once a month!). I have used it and appears
to be very resistant to drought, traffic and dog urine. We are going to not use our
sprinkler system at all this year and see what survives of our old grass and if it dies
convert fully over to Pearl's grass seed. I think the city of Edina should inform citizens
about all the different kinds of longrooted grass because many of us still desire lawns.
CHALLENGES WHEN CONSERVING WATER 3 Answers · 0
3 of 8 Full Report
Water Conservation
Closed May 31, 2017 · Discussion · 14 Participants · 4 Topics · 33 Answers · 5 Replies · 13 Votes
Replies
What challenges do you face when trying to conserve water?
Michael Bowers · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 05, 2017 2:59 pm
0 Votes
I get frustrated with odd/even watering scheme in that it actually encourages me to
water my yard more often than not. If my lawn is looking dry but there is rain in the
forecast, but the next day is NOT my watering day, I might choose to water my lawn
anyway. Rather than a 1950's technology of odd/even, why not give each resident 30
watering days? They can log into a website and declare their day. Maybe they choose to
pre-register every other day because that works. For people like me I can opt to use
them on the fly as I see fit. I turn on my sprinkler, push a button on my smart phone,
debit my watering account 1 day, done. No fear of fines and I can meter my water use
more economically due to prevailing weather conditions.
Ross Bintner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 24, 2017 8:55 am
0 Votes
I've been working to reduce my household use by installing low flow showerheads, sink
aerators, and toilet retrofit kits. While all the tech fixes have worked to some extent, my
household water use is still trending higher. The challenge I face is getting my two
children (ages 7 and 9) to think about how they use water and adopt habits that
conserve water. It's especially tough since they seem to have so much fun playing with
water outside and singing in the shower.
Neil Johnson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 24, 2017 1:49 pm
0 Votes
Has anyone tried longrooted grass such as Pearl's grass seed? Longrooted grass is 12"-
14" deep compared to regular grass which is 3-4" deep. This makes it more drought
tolerant and grows slower (need to only mow once a month!). I have used it and appears
to be very resistant to drought, traffic and dog urine. We are going to not use our
sprinkler system at all this year and see what survives of our old grass and if it dies
convert fully over to Pearl's grass seed. I think the city of Edina should inform citizens
about all the different kinds of longrooted grass because many of us still desire lawns.
CITY ENCOURAGE RESIDENTS 12 Answers · 3 Replies
How can the City encourage water conservation?
Sharon G · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 05, 2017 11:46 am
4 Votes
By being a role model. There are so many grassy areas that the city mows. I know they
don't water it, so it doesn't really pertain to water consumption directly, but the constant
carpet of grass in public areas contributes to the concept of big lawns, which do
consume water. The city should begin a "Ground Cover Initiative" that installs attractive,
low-maintenance, low water-use ground covers instead of seeding/sodding in public
areas.
4 of 8 Full Report
Water Conservation
Closed May 31, 2017 · Discussion · 14 Participants · 4 Topics · 33 Answers · 5 Replies · 13 Votes
Response:
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 18, 2017 4:22 pm
Cudos to you, Sharon! I second your motion!
Michael Bowers · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 05, 2017 2:43 pm
1 Votes
My water bill is often at or below the usage level that requires a minimum payment.
Financially there is no incentive for me to reduce my water usage any further.
Response:
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 18, 2017 4:21 pm
Good for you, Michael! You obviously use a minimal amount of water, and I, for one,
would be interested in knowing how you manage your use!
Susan Tucker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 06, 2017 9:14 am
2 Votes
Encourage the use of low water-use shower heads. As technology improves on
compostable toilets, incorporate use in building codes.
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 18, 2017 4:37 pm
2 Votes
Fracking for natural gas takes a lot of water which is forever contaminated. I suggest our
city states publicly that we won't allow fracking and will pressure our state and our
country to outlaw this destructive mining practice.
Raise the cost of water. I know this is unpopular, but it seems to me that people should
pay whatever it costs to clean up rivers, lakes, and oceans. Paying the true cost of clean
water would incentivize all of us to value clean water for its true worth.
Kate Quale · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 23, 2017 7:40 pm
1 Votes
The City of Edina could offer grants or rebates like it's neighbors St.Louis Park &
Minneapolis do to create raingardens, prairie restoration & other low water usage
landscaping.
Response:
Louann Waddick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 24, 2017 10:26 pm
The watersheds offer grants
amy frerker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 24, 2017 8:12 am
0 Votes
Love Katie's idea. Rain gardens are much more beautiful than a big expanse of grass.
5 of 8 Full Report
Water Conservation
Closed May 31, 2017 · Discussion · 14 Participants · 4 Topics · 33 Answers · 5 Replies · 13 Votes
Let's follow the leadership being exhibited in Mpls and SLP. Our residents are ready!
Neil Johnson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 24, 2017 1:49 pm
1 Votes
Has anyone tried longrooted grass such as Pearl's grass seed? Longrooted grass is 12"-
14" deep compared to regular grass which is 3-4" deep. This makes it more drought
tolerant and grows slower (need to only mow once a month!). I have used it and appears
to be very resistant to drought, traffic and dog urine. We are going to not use our
sprinkler system at all this year and see what survives of our old grass and if it dies
convert fully over to Pearl's grass seed. I think the city of Edina should inform citizens
about all the different kinds of longrooted grass because many of us still desire lawns.
Louann Waddick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 24, 2017 10:28 pm
0 Votes
Is there a way to enforce the watering of odd and even days? Is there a fine or any
consequence?
Jennifer Collins · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 25, 2017 2:28 pm
0 Votes
I too wonder about residents overwatering with their automatic sprinkler systems. I
often see my neighbors' sprinkler systems running during or just after we've gotten lots
of rain. My immediate neighbors water so heavily that I have bog-like conditions in one
area of my property and water is constantly draining out of their yard into the street.
Their water bill must be huge in the summer. Can you identify properties with excessive
water usage in summer months and send notices encouraging them to decrease water
use? Make it financially punitive when water usage exceeds certain thresholds? Require
mandatory installation of rain sensors with irrigation systems? It just seems so wasteful.
For the record, I have an irrigation system with a rain sensor but I frequently just turn the
system off when we have adequate rainfall. I hardly used it last summer and haven't
used it yet this year and my garden looks beautiful!
ACTIONS WILLING TO TRY 7 Answers · 0 Replies
Weather is becoming more extreme; heavy rains and long hot droughts can
make managing turf a challenge. What alternatives to traditional lawns and
lawn care practices have you implemented? What would you be willing to
try?
Jonathan Scoll · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 25, 2017 10:30 am
3 Votes
We have replaced most of our turfgrass lawn with a prairie. It takes no water
whatsoever, even in the hottest part of the summer.
Prairie planting is not for everyone, however. For one thing, it is not a "drop in" solution.
6 of 8 Full Report
Water Conservation
Closed May 31, 2017 · Discussion · 14 Participants · 4 Topics · 33 Answers · 5 Replies · 13 Votes
It takes time -- in our case, about five years -- to establish. It is also not free: we spend
money every year on a specialized service (Prairie Restorations, out of Rogers) to control
weeds and invasives, and to burn it (legally!) every few years. We would not
recommend it for a street planting, either: it would clash with neighbors' lawns!
But for all that, we find it worthwhile, even fun, to have something that does much less
harm to the environment than turfgrass, and helps, in even a small way, to make our life
more sustainable. We use no lawn water or lawn chemicals, and we contribute no
fertilizer runoff to the lake we live on (Indianhead Lake).
I would be happy to share more of our prairie "experience," -- pros and cons, mistakes,
"lessons learned," etc., with anyone interested!
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 18, 2017 3:59 pm
0 Votes
Good for you, Jonathan! I understand prairie grass isn't for everyone, but where would
you suggest it be established? Surely there are those who could follow your example.
How would you describe a suitable candidate? Are there city-owned areas such as large
parks where the city would do well to establish it?
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 18, 2017 4:10 pm
1 Votes
Friends of ours landscaped their front and back yards with perennials, decorative,
medium-sized rocks, stone walking paths, etc. The yards were very attractive and
inviting, fun to walk through, looking at all the different varieties of perennials, and
totally eliminated the use of turf grass.
Once established, their yards needed very little care. We're seniors and can no longer do
such creative, beautiful work. We just go with whatever is natural, "weeds" and all. We
never water the lawns, but we do use "slow drip" on the bushes in the Fall so they can
survive the winters.
amy frerker · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 24, 2017 8:09 am
0 Votes
I would be happy to replace our entire yard with plantings and permeable paving! Also,
it would be super if the City of Edina would offer discounts on (or free!) rain barrels for
residents! SLP does. We'd be willing try almost anything to conserve!
Ross Bintner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 24, 2017 9:05 am
1 Votes
7 of 8 Full Report
Water Conservation
Closed May 31, 2017 · Discussion · 14 Participants · 4 Topics · 33 Answers · 5 Replies · 13 Votes
This Spring I'm excited to try to over seed a "Bee Lawn" into my current mix of clover
and fescue. https://www.beelab.umn.edu/bees/beelawn In the last few years, I've been
setting my mowing height progressively higher, and have noticed that the lawn is much
more drought tolerant.
Neil Johnson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 24, 2017 1:48 pm
0 Votes
Has anyone tried longrooted grass such as Pearl's grass seed? Longrooted grass is 12"-
14" deep compared to regular grass which is 3-4" deep. This makes it more drought
tolerant and grows slower (need to only mow once a month!). I have used it and appears
to be very resistant to drought, traffic and dog urine. We are going to not use our
sprinkler system at all this year and see what survives of our old grass and if it dies
convert fully over to Pearl's grass seed. I think the city of Edina should inform citizens
about all the different kinds of longrooted grass because many of us still desire lawns.
Louann Waddick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 24, 2017 10:24 pm
0 Votes
We have gotten rid of all the turf in backyard and some in the front-dry creek bed,
berms,rain barrels, & perennials in a large area. Would love to put in permeable pavers
at the end of the driveway but can't afford it at this time. The bee lawns are intriguing-
they suggest Self Heal, Creeping Thyme, & Dutch White Clover. Fine and tall fescues are
a better choice than Kentucky Blue grass.
8 of 8 Full Report
The CITY of
EDINA
Speak Up, Edina!
May Discussion: Water Conservation
The CITY of
EDINASpeakUpEdina.org
EdinaMN.gov 2
The CITY of
EDINAWater Conservation
In this discussion, the City posed the following questions:
•How do you conserve water at your home, apartment or work?
•What challenges do you face when trying to conserve water?
•How can the City encourage water conservation?
•Weather is becoming more extreme; heavy rains and long hot droughts can make managing
turf a challenge. What alternatives to traditional lawns and lawn care practices have you
implemented? What would you be willing to try?
EdinaMN.gov 3
The CITY of
EDINAMay Discussion
•Open May 1-31
•33 comments made in total
•428 new visitor sessions; 553 total sessions
•1,538 page views
EdinaMN.gov 4
The CITY of
EDINA
•Commenters do everything from buying water efficient
appliances, reduce water use in their lawn to water reuse within
the home
•Respondents were very supportive of one another; sharing ideas
and educational resources.
Common Themes
EdinaMN.gov 5
The CITY of
EDINA
•Lawn maintenance was a major part of the conversation:
•-Respondents observed a lot of irrigation systems are running at
unnecessary times (while raining, after a rainfall, etc.)
•-Respondents varied in conservation practices from growing longer turf
grass to carving out more room for perennial/native plants to hiring a
company to manage the yard as a prairie
•-Respondents were interested in more incentives, technical assistance to
convert lawns and utilizing permeable pavers
•-Questions raised by respondents were: How do you get people to care?
How do we look at lawns differently?
•
Lawn Maintenance
EdinaMN.gov 6
The CITY of
EDINA
What did the respondents ask of the City?
•To be a role model by using alternatives to grass lawns
•Incentivize people. Ideas range from:
•-Water billing structure to encourage conservation
•-Rebate programs for rain barrels and smart sensors for irrigation
•-Technical assistance (Metro Blooms and other nonprofits provide this
service)
•Enforce current every other day water ordinance
Requests of the City
EdinaMN.gov 7
The CITY of
EDINASpeak Up, Edina!
•June Discussion Topic:
Food Trucks
EdinaMN.gov 8
The CITY of
EDINASpeak Up, Edina!
Questions?
SpeakUpEdina.org
EdinaMN.gov 9
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI I.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Jeff Brown, C ommunity Health Adminis trato r
Item Activity:
Subject:P UBLI C HE AR I NG : C ertification of Abatement of
P ub lic Health Nuis anc e, R es o lution No. 2017-61
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
C onduct public hearing and adopt R esolution N o. 2017-61 certifying costs for P ublic H ealth N uisance
abatement.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
P roperty at 425 J efferson Ave. was declared a P ublic H ealth N uisance after a fire damaged the property.
R epeated attempts were made to coordinate with the property owner to abate the nuisance, with no result. A
company was contracted to clean up the property, and the cost must be certified against the property for
payment.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Res olution No. 2017-61: As s es s ment for Abatement of Public Health Nuis ance
Notification of Public Hearing
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-61
A RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH NUISANCE
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has
met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed special
assessments for the improvement listed below:
ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH NUISANCE CL-17
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1.Each special assessment as set forth in the special assessment roll on file in the office of
the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the
special assessments against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included in
herein found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the special assessments levied
against it.
2.The special assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said
installments together with interest at a rate of 6.5% per annum, on the entire special assessments
from the date hereof to December 31, 2017. To each subsequent installment shall be added
interest at the above rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The number of such annual
installments shall be as follows:
Abatement of Public Health Nuisance CL-17
3.The owner of the property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of special
assessment to the County Auditor, partially prepay an amount not less than 25% of the whole
assessment to the City Treasurer and no interest shall be charged on the portion of the assessment
prepaid; or pay the whole of the special assessments on such property, to the City Treasurer,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire special assessment is paid before November
20, 2017 following the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the
City Treasurer the entire amount of the special assessments remaining unpaid. Such payment
must be made before November 20, 2017.
4.The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified supplicate of these special assessments to
the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such special
assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted this 20th day of June, 2017.
ATTEST:
City Clerk Mayor
Levy No. 19645
Resolution No. 2017-61
Page Two
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify
that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of June 20, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2017.
City Clerk
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
IMPROVEMENT NO. CL-17
The Edina City Council will meet at 7 p.m., Tuesday, June 20, 2017, at City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St.,
Edina, MN, to approve and adopt the listed special assessments for public health nuisance abatement
against the following described property: 425 Jefferson Avenue.
Property Identification No. 30-117-21-22-0122
The special assessment to this property for public health nuisance abatement is: $5,830.00. The proposed
assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk.
No invoices will be mailed. This is the only notice you will receive regarding payment.
Payment Options
The proposed assessment is payable in one annual principal installment extending over a period of one year
at the rate of 6.5 percent.
Should the City Council adopt the assessment roll at the June 20, 2017 meeting, you may pay the assessment
in one of these ways:
1. Pay the whole of the assessment without interest to the City to the Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th St,
Edina, MN 55424 on or before Nov. 20, 2017.
2.Pay a minimum of 25 percent of the assessment to the Assessing Office, 4801 W. 50th St, Edina, MN
55424 on or before Nov. 20, 2017. The remaining balance will be certified to the County Auditor and
your annual payment will be payable with your real estate taxes in 2018, with interest on the
remaining assessment at the rate of 6.5 percent per annum from June 20, 2017 to Dec. 31, 2017.
3.Pay the assessment with your real estate taxes. If the special assessment is not paid in the Assessing
Office by Nov. 20, 2017, it will be certified to the County Auditor and your first year’s payment will
be payable with your real estate taxes in 2018, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of
6.5 percent per annum from June 20, 2017 to Dec. 31, 2017.
Objections/Appeals
If you wish to object or appeal to this assessment:
1.File a signed, written objection with the City Clerk prior to the assessment hearing, or present the
written objection to the Mayor at the assessment hearing.
2.Serve notice of the appeal to the Mayor or the City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the
assessment and file such notice with the District Court within 10 days after the notice was served to
the Mayor or the City Clerk.
1
To comment on the special assessment, you may:
•Write to City of Edina, Health Division, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424
•Email to mail@EdinaMN.gov, Attention City Council and Health Division.
•Attend the June 20, 2017 public hearing and offer comments.
If you have questions regarding the project, please call the Health Division at 952-826-0370. If you have
questions about paying your assessment, please call the Assessing Division of the Community Development
Department at 952-826-0365.
May 22, 2017
Deb Mangen
City Clerk
Cut the bottom section and mail in with your payment if paying on or before Nov. 20, 2017:
PAYMENT PROCEDURE
•If paying on or before Nov. 20, 2017, please cut and return this stub with your payment.
•Make check payable to the City of Edina.
•Mail payment or pay in person: Edina City Hall, Assessing Division, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424.
PID Impr. No.
Pay this amount by
Nov. 20, 2017, to avoid
interest charges.
If not paid on or before Nov. 20, 2017,
the assessment will be placed on your
property taxes at 6.5% interest rate.
30-117-21-22-0122 CL-17 $5830.00
Amount Enclosed: Name:
2
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI I.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:C ary Teague, C o mmunity Development Directo r
Item Activity:
Subject:P UBLI C HE AR I NG : R esolutio n No . 2017-63
C ond itional Use P ermit fo r Jesus C eleb ration C hurc h,
6879 Was hington Avenue
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Adopt R esolution N o. 2017-63 approving the conditional use permit.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
S ee attached staff report.
O n June 14, 2017, the P lanning C ommission unanimously recommended approval of the conditional use permit.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Staff Report
Res olution No. 2017-63
Draft PC Minutes RE Jes us Church
Church Planner Pres entation
The CITY of
EDINA
Conditional Use Permit
6879 Washington Avenue
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 2
Eden Prairie
Edina
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 3
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 4
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 5
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 6
The CITY of
EDINA This Request Requires:
www.EdinaMN.gov 7
•Conditional Use Permit
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 8
City Standard (PID) Existing
Building
Setbacks
Front –
Washington Ave
Side – North
Side – South
Rear – East
50 feet
20 feet
20 feet
50 feet
100+ feet
30 feet
30 feet
60+ feet
Building Height 4 Stories 1 story
Building
Coverage
45% 20%
Parking Stalls
(Site)
48 required stalls for
the sanctuary
maximum seating
capacity of 144 seats
102 spaces
Existing
(shared
arrangement)
The CITY of
EDINA CUP Criteria
www.EdinaMN.gov 9
1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities,
utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements;
2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property;
3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or
welfare;
4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of
other property in the vicinity;
5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the
district in which it is located, as imposed by this chapter; and
6. Is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 10
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 11
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 12
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 13
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI I.C .
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:C ary Teague, C o mmunity Development Directo r
Item Activity:
Subject:P UBLI C HE AR I NG : R esolutio n No . 2017-62 &
O rd inance No . 2017-06 Zoning O rdinanc e
Amend ment & P reliminary S ite P lan R eview; 5109-25
Wes t 49th S treet, G reat O aks & T E Miller
Develo p ment
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Adoption R esolution N o. 2017-62 Approving the P reliminary D evelopment P lan and grant first reading of
O rdinance No. 2017-06 amending the P U D-5 Z oning D istrict.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
S ee attached P lanning C ommission Staff R eport
O n June 14, 2017, the P lanning C ommission recommended approval of the request.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Staff Report - Part 1
Staff Report - Part 2
Staff Report - Part 3 of 3
Ordinance No. 2017-06
Res olution No. 2017-62
Corres pondence
PC Draft Minutes The Villas
The VIllas Presentation
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-06
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
TO REVISE THE PUD, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-5
DISTRICT AT 5109-5125 WEST 49th STREET
The City Of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended as follows:
Sec. 36-492. - Planned Unit Development District-5; 5109-5125 West 49th Street (Vernon
Townhomes). (The Villas).
(a) Legal description:
(1) Lot 3, 4, 5 and 6, and all that part of Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12 lying North of State
Highway No. 5, Block 4, Tingdale Bros.' Brookside", except that part of Lot 12
which lies southeasterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on
the east line of said Lot 12 distant 35 feet south of the northeast corner thereof;
thence run southwesterly to the southwest corner of the above described Lot 12
and there terminating together with:
a. A 25-foot wide strip of land lying east of the Minneapolis, Northfield and
Southern Railroad between West 49th Street and Vernon Avenue in Section
28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
b. Being Torrens Property, Certificate Number: 577550.
(2) Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, Tingdale Bros.' Brookside, except that part of said Lot 8
described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east boundary of said Lot 8
distant 28 feet north of the southeast corner thereof; thence south along said
east boundary 28 feet; thence west along the south boundary of said lot, 50 feet;
thence north along the west boundary of said lot, 12 feet; thence northeasterly
to the point of beginning, including any part or portion of any street or alley
adjacent to said premises vacated or to be vacated, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
(b) Approved plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans
received by the city on June 24, 2013, _________except as amended by City Council
2
Resolution No. 2013-64,________ on file in the office of the planning department under
file number 2013-005.13a._________.
(c) Principal uses. Residential buildings containing six twelve or fewer units.
(d) Accessory uses.
(1) All accessory uses allowed in the R-2, Double Dwelling Unit District.
(2) Signs allowed per the Planned Residential District.
(e) Conditional uses. There are no conditional uses for Planned Unit Development District-
5 (PUD-5).
(f) Development standards. Development standards per the PRD-2 Zoning District, except
the following:
(1) Building setbacks.
a. Front.
1. 49th Street:
(i) 35 14 feet-structure (east building)
5 feet-structure (west building).
(ii) 18 6 feet-stair/deck/patio.
2. Vernon: 7 3 feet.
b. Side—East: 15 and 42 20 feet.
c. Rear—South West: 15 10 feet.
(2) Building height: 2½ stories or 35.5 feet. 3-1/2 stories 54 feet
(3) Building coverage: 26 42 percent.
(4) Parking stalls (Residential): 2 enclosed stalls per unit.
Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication.
First Reading: June 20, 2017
Second Reading:
Published:
3
ATTEST:
______________________________ _____________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on:
Send two affidavits of publication.
Bill to Edina City Clerk
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that
the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of June 20, 2017 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2017.
________________________________
City Clerk
The CITY of
EDINA
Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the
PUD-5 (Vernon Townhome) Zoning District
and Preliminary Development Plan
5109-5125 West 49th Street
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 2
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 3
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 4
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 5
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 6
Sketch Plan
2013 Approved
Plan
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 7
2013
Approved Plan
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 8
2013
Approved Plan
The CITY of
EDINA Applicant Request
EdinaMN.gov 9
Zoning Ordinance Amendment to the existing PUD-5,
Planned Unit Development – 5109-5125 West 49th
Street;
Preliminary Site Plan Review; and
Preliminary Plat
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 10
Sketch Plan
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 11
Sketch Plan
The CITY of
EDINA Revisions from Sketch Plan:
EdinaMN.gov 12
Reduced number of units by 10 to fit the current Comprehensive Plan (27
units in Sketch & 17 units proposed.)
West building eliminated and replaced with detached units.
Shift the east building away from single family home.
Eliminated the pedestrian connection through the site due to the sound wall.
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 13
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 14
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 15
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 16
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 17
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 18
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 19
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 20
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 21
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 22
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 23
Sketch Plan
2013 Approved
Plan
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 24
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 25
Preliminary Plat
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 26
City Standard
(PUD-5)
Proposed
Front – 49th Street
Front – Vernon
Side – East
Side – West
35 feet – Structure
18 feet – stair/deck/patio
7 feet
15 & 42 feet
15 feet
14 feet* (east building)
5 feet* (west building)
6 feet stair*
3 feet*
20 feet*
10 feet*
Building Height 2-1/2 stories or
35.5 feet (flat roof)
3-1/2 stories 54 feet*
Measured to the roofline
Building Coverage 26% 42%*
Density 12 units per acre 12 units per acre (17 units)
Parking Stalls 2 enclosed spaces
per unit
2 enclosed spaces per unit
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 27
The CITY of
EDINA Primary Issue
•Is the proposed Amendment to the PUD-5 Zoning District reasonable to
develop this site?
EdinaMN.gov 28
1. As determined in the original PUD; the proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD
zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would:
a. Create a more efficient and creative use of the property and would create a
better connection to Vernon and the Grandview area with the inclusion of a
sidewalk north/south through the site.
b. Provide internal parking.
c. Enhance landscaping.
d. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only building built on the site.
2. The proposal maintains the medium density designation per the City’s
Comprehensive Plan. It provides a transition from the adjacent single-family
resident ial area to Vernon and the Grandview commercial district.
3. The existing roadways and parking would support the project.
4. The proposal would be a vast improvement over the current two existing apartment
buildings and single-family home on the site.
5. While the proposed setbacks, height and lot coverage exceed the existing PUD
zoning standards, there would be adequate green space, no surface parking and
adequate separation from the nearest single-family home to the east (20 feet) and to
49th Street (15 feet) due to the large right -of-way.
The CITY of
EDINA Recommendation
EdinaMN.gov 29
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 30
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 31
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 32
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 33
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 34
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 35
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 36
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 37
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 38
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 39
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 40
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 41
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 42
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 43
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 44
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 45
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 46
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 47
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 48
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 49
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 50
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 51
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 52
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 53
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 54
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 55
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 56
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 57
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 58
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 59
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 60
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI I.D.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
F rom:Bill Neuendorf, Ec o nomic Development Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:P UBLI C HE AR I NG : R esolutio n No . 2017-68
Adopting a Modific ation to the R edevelo p ment P lan
for the S outheas t Ed ina R ed evelo p ment P rojec t Area;
and Es tab lis hing the 50th and F ranc e 2 Tax Inc rement
F inanc ing District T herein and Adopting a Tax
Inc rement F inanc ing P lan T herefo r
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve R esolution 2017-68.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
T his item considers the use of Tax Increment F inancing (T I F ) as a public finance tool to support public and
private improvements in portions of 50th and F rance D istrict. T he creation of a new T I F R edevelopment D istrict
is proposed.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
s taff report Res 2017-68 50-Fr 2 TIF
Res 2017-68 establis h 50-Fr 2 TIF
50 Fr 2 TIF Plan
50 France 2 TIF Dis trict Pres entation
Collaborative Parking Overview
June 20, 2017
Mayor and Council Members
Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager
Resolution 2017-68: Adopting a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area; and Establishing the 50th and France 2
Tax Increment Financing District Therein and Adopting a Tax Increment Financing Plan
Therefor
Information / Background:
The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) recommends that the City of Edina
consider a new Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District to enable public and private improvements on
Market Street (formerly known as W. 49-1/2 Street).
Tax Increment Financing was the public finance tool used in the 1970s to help shape the mixed-use
50th and France District that exists today. The 1970s TIF Plan was very ambitious. It included 143
parcels and 18.3 acres. Incremental taxes were used to fund the creation of the pedestrian byways,
streetscape elements and the existing Center and North Parking Garages. TIF also stimulated the
conversion of gas stations into market-rate condominiums at 50th & Halifax and 51st & France. Other
private investments occurred before the original TIF District was de-certified in 2009.
In 2013/2014, the HRA purchased two properties adjacent to the North Ramp in response to
business owner recommendations to improve parking conditions. After discussion in 2014, it was
deemed preferable to develop these properties in a manner that would add public parking and
additional vitality and street life to the District. After lengthy discussions with the HRA’s selected
development partner, it is recommended that TIF be used to promote investments in and public
improvements at 50th and France.
The City/HRA retained several professionals to provide expertise and assistance on this project.
Ehlers & Associates prepared the proposed TIF Plan and related modifications to the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Stantec Consulting was engaged to evaluate the existing
structures for conformance with Minnesota TIF Statutes. Legal review was provided by Dorsey &
Whitney.
STAFF REPORT Page 2
The proposed Tax Increment Financing District conforms to the requirements of Section 469 of the
Minnesota Statutes and is based on the following activities and findings:
• Parcels are located within the boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project
Area,
• Parcels identified as “mixed use center” in Comprehensive Plan (pages 4-25 to 4-29),
• Identified as “potential area of change” in Comprehensive Plan (pages 4-30 to 4-33),
• Aligned with several of the strategic actions identified in Vision Edina (page 7, 9, 10), and
• Proposed project could achieve mixed-use project and improve public parking in a manner
that is welcoming to all customers - drivers, bus riders, bicyclists and pedestrians.
The proposed 50th and France 2 TIF District is approximately 2.9 acres in size and includes nine
parcels that are anticipated to be redeveloped in the near future. Most of the parcels are tax-
exempt. Two parcels are vacant and the remaining are currently used for parking. The proposed re-
use of these properties is based on the zoning approvals and modifications to the Comprehensive
Plan that were granted preliminary approvals on April 18, 2017. Final zoning approvals are
anticipated on June 20, 2017. The new development will consist of 110 new apartment units,
approximately 35,000 Square Feet of new commercial space centered around a new public plaza.
New underground parking will be provided – one level will be for apartment tenants and the other
will be available to the general public. The existing North Parking Ramp will also be expanded from
262 to 573 public parking stalls.
In May 2017, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, other taxing agencies, such as Hennepin
County, and Edina School District #273, were notified of the potential creation of the 50th and
France 2 West TIF District. To date, no comments have been received from these agencies. The
Edina Planning Commission discussed the proposed TIF Plans on June 14, 2017 and found that the
proposal is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed Resolution 2017-68 and proposed 50th and France 2 TIF Plan are attached for your
review and consideration. Representatives from Ehlers & Associates, the City’s public financing and
redevelopment advisors will be available to answer questions.
The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority has a similar agenda item identified as HRA
Resolution 2017-05.
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Council member ______________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-68
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA; AND
ESTABLISHING THE 50TH AND FRANCE 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT THEREIN AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
THEREFOR.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals
1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(the "HRA") has heretofore established the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and
adopted the Redevelopment Plan therefor. It has been proposed by the HRA and the City that
the City adopt a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Project Area (the "Redevelopment Plan Modification") and establish the 50th
and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District (the "District") therein and adopt a Tax Increment
Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") therefor (the Redevelopment Plan Modification and the TIF Plan
are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with
applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and Sections 469.174
to 469.1794, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for
the Council's consideration.
1.02. The HRA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have
caused the Plans to be prepared.
1.03. The HRA and City have performed all actions required by law to be performed
prior to the establishment of the District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans,
including, but not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District
No. 273 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the District, a review of
and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, approval of the Plans by
the HRA on June 20, 2017, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as
required by law.
1.04. Certain written reports (the ''Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities
contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to
the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports,
including the redevelopment qualifications reports and planning documents, include data,
information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and
determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the
Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the
same extent as if set forth in full herein.
1.05 The City is not modifying the boundaries of Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Project Area, but is however, modifying the Redevelopment Plan therefor.
Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification.
2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically finds
that: (a) the land within the Project area would not be available for redevelopment without the
financial aid to be sought under this Redevelopment Plan; (b) the Redevelopment Plan, as
modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for
the development of the Project by private enterprise; and (c) that the Redevelopment Plan, as
modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole.
Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing
District
3.01. The Council hereby finds that the District is in the public interest and is a
"redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10 of the Act.
3.02. The Council finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely
through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased
market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax
increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from
the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments
for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Plan.
3.03. The Council finds that the Plans conform to the general plan for the development
or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the Plans will afford maximum opportunity
consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment
of the District by private enterprise.
3.04. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above
findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each
determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3.05. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority elects to calculate fiscal
disparities for the District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3,
clause b, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the District.
Section 4. Public Purpose
4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act
and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide
employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the
State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City
believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF
Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make this development
financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a developer are incidental and do
not outweigh the primary public benefits.
Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans
5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation
the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified,
established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the HRA Executive Director.
5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and
directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and
present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and
contracts necessary for this purpose.
5.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax
capacity of the District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the
amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the Edina
Housing and Redevelopment Authority is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this
request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together
with a list of all properties within the District, for which building permits have been issued during
the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution.
5.04. The Executive Director is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the
Plans with the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the
State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council
member _________________, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
Dated: June 20, 2017
ATTEST:
_______________________________ __________________________________
James B. Hovland, Mayor Debra Mangen, City Clerk
(Seal)
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by
the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 20, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, ___________.
_______________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-68
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing
Plan (TIF Plan) for 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District (District), as required
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows:
1. Finding that 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district
as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10.
The District consists of nine parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for rental housing
and commercial/industrial purposes. At least 70 percent of the area of the parcels in the
District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other
similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including
outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or
clearance. (See Appendix F of the TIF Plan.)
2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not
reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be
expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the
increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after
subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of
the District permitted by the TIF Plan.
The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to
occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This
finding is supported by the fact that the redevelopment proposed in the TIF Plan meets
the City's objectives for redevelopment. The existing property contains vacant or
substandard buildings with high costs related to demolition, remediation and
reconstruction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also requires district-wide parking,
transportation and utility infrastructure investment. With limited amounts of property
available for expansion adjacent to the existing project and height/density limitations,
and the cost of financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only
through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer was asked for
and provided its proforma as justification that the developer would not have gone
forward without tax increment assistance.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without
the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value
estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of
the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF
Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds that the development intensity and tax base
created on currently underutilized public property requires public improvements that are
improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the cost of site preparation,
demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include underground parking and
utilities will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this
area. Historically, site and public improvements costs necessary to sustain the required
density have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City
reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on
this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development.
Therefore, the City concludes as follows:
a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District
will increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0.
b. If the proposed development occurs, the total increase in market value will be
$48,108,130.
c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration
of the district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $12,253,149.
d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur,
the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market
value increase greater than $35,854,980 (the amount in clause b less the amount
in clause c) without similar tax increment assistance.
3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development
or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole.
The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to
the general development plan of the City.
4. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with
the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Project Area by private enterprise.
The project to be assisted by the District will result in increased employment in the City and the
State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State
and add a high quality development to the City which also expands the availability of safe and
decent life-cycle housing in the City.
As of June 14, 2017
Draft for Public Hearing
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan
for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area
and the
Tax Increment Financing Plan
for the establishment of
the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District
(a redevelopment district)
within
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
City of Edina
Hennepin County
State of Minnesota
Public Hearing: June 20, 2017
Adopted:
Prepared by: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1105
651-697-8500 fax: 651-697-8555 www.ehlers-inc.com
Table of Contents
(for reference purposes only)
Section 1 - Modification to the Redevelopment Plan
for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area ........................... 1-1
Foreword ............................................................. 1-1
Section 2 - Tax Increment Financing Plan
for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District ....................... 2-1
Subsection 2-1. Foreword............................................... 2-1
Subsection 2-2. Statutory Authority........................................ 2-1
Subsection 2-3. Statement of Objectives ................................... 2-1
Subsection 2-4. Redevelopment Plan Overview .............................. 2-1
Subsection 2-5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired . 2-2
Subsection 2-6. Classification of the District................................. 2-2
Subsection 2-7. Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District........... 2-4
Subsection 2-8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity
Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ................ 2-4
Subsection 2-9. Budgeted Sources of Revenue/Bonds to be Issued . ............. 2-6
Subsection 2-10. Uses of Funds ........................................... 2-7
Subsection 2-11. Fiscal Disparities Election.................................. 2-7
Subsection 2-12. Business Subsidies....................................... 2-8
Subsection 2-13. County Road Costs ....................................... 2-9
Subsection 2-14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ................ 2-10
Subsection 2-15. Supporting Documentation ................................ 2-12
Subsection 2-16. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues ....................... 2-12
Subsection 2-17. Modifications to the District................................ 2-12
Subsection 2-18. Administrative Expenses .................................. 2-13
Subsection 2-19. Limitation of Increment ................................... 2-13
Subsection 2-20. Use of Tax Increment .................................... 2-14
Subsection 2-21. Excess Increments ...................................... 2-15
Subsection 2-22. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer .............. 2-15
Subsection 2-23. Assessment Agreements ................................. 2-15
Subsection 2-24. Administration of the District ............................... 2-16
Subsection 2-25. Annual Disclosure Requirements ........................... 2-16
Subsection 2-26. Reasonable Expectations ................................. 2-16
Subsection 2-27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment . ................ 2-16
Subsection 2-28. Summary.............................................. 2-17
Appendix A
Project Description ...................................................... A-1
Appendix B
Map of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the 50th and France 2 TIF District
..................................................................... B-1
Appendix C
Description of Property to be Included in the District ............................ C-1
Appendix D
Estimated Cash Flow for the District ........................................ D-1
Appendix E
Minnesota Business Assistance Form ....................................... E-1
Appendix F
Redevelopment Qualifications for the District .................................. F-1
Appendix G
Findings Including But/For Qualifications..................................... G-1
Section 1 - Modification to the Redevelopment Plan
for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area
Foreword
The following text represents a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Project Area. This modification represents a continuation of the goals and objectives set forth
in the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area. Generally, the substantive
changes include the establishment of 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District.
Section 1 - Municipal Action Taken
Based upon the statutory authority described in the Redevelopment Plan, the public purpose findings by the
City Council and for the purpose of fulfilling the City’s development objects as set forth in the
Redevelopment Plan, the City Council has created, established and designated the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan pursuant to and in accordance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.001 to 469.047.
The original and amended Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan documents and amendments have designated
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as a redevelopment project and also a tax increment financing plan
for tax increment districts created prior to 1988. The Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District was
created in 1988 pursuant to Tax Increment Financing Plan 88-1, which was subsequently renamed the
Centennial Lakes Tax Increment District and referred to by Hennepin County as District #1203 and #1249.
For purposes of clarification, this modification will refer to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan as the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.002. The following
municipal action has been taken with regard to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan:
September 29, 1977: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the “HRA”) approved the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan.
October 5, 1981: The Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan was amended to identify project
costs and bonded indebtedness incurred to finance those costs.
May 6, 1985: The HRA and the City approved an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project
Area Plan which includes the establishment of an interest reduction program and enlarges the project area to
include the “1985 Project Area.”
August 19, 1985: The HRA and the City approve d the First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area Plan to enlarge the 1985 Project Area and to authorize the
issuance of additional bonds to acquire land within the enlarged 1985 Project Area.
1987: The HRA and City approved the 1987 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to
enlarge the project area to include the 1987 Project Area.
1988: The HRA and City approved the 1988 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan that
provide an Interest Reduction Program in the amount of $2,500,000 to assist in the financing and construction
of housing units, and authorize the HRA and City to incur bonded indebtedness.
February 21, 2012: The HRA and City expand the Southeast Edina Project Area.
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1-1
April 17, 2012: The HRA and City establish the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District.
February 18, 2014: The HRA and City establish the Pentagon Park Tax Increment Financing District.
March 2, 2016: The HRA and City establish the Grandview 2 Tax Increment Financing District.
April 5, 2016: The HRA and City modify the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax
Increment Financing District and establish the 66 West Tax Increment Financing District.
(AS MODIFIED JUNE 20, 2017)
June 20, 2017: The HRA and City are establishing the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing
District.
For further information, a review of the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project
Area is recommended. It is available from the HRA Executive Director at the City of Edina. Other relevant
information is contained in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts
located within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area.
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area 1-2
Section 2 - Tax Increment Financing Plan
for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District
Subsection 2-1. Foreword
The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA"), the City of Edina (the "City"), staff and
consultants have prepared the following information to establish the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment
Financing District (the "District"), a redevelopment tax increment financing district, located in the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Project Area.
Subsection 2-2. Statutory Authority
Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or
redevelopment to occur or to promote a greater degree of development that allows City objectives to be
fulfilled. To this end, the HRA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes
("M.S."), Sections 469.001 to 469.047, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794,
inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), to assist in financing public costs
related to this project.
This section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") for the District. Other relevant
information is contained in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Project Area, adopted September 29, 1977, and modified from time to time.
Subsection 2-3. Statement of Objectives
The District currently consists of nine parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights-of-way. As a part of
the City’s vision for the 50th and France Commercial Area, the District is being created to facilitate the
redevelopment of existing HRA-owned property which is determined to be underutilized and consisting of
obsolete structures, vacant areas, and outdated and inadequate public infrastructure. The proposed
redevelopment contains new construction of approximately 110 unit apartment building and 32,500 square
feet of commercial elements in the City as well as auxiliary infrastructure. Please see Appendix A for further
description of the anticipated project. The HRA is considering an agreement with Edina Market Street LLC
as the developer at the time of preparation of this TIF Plan. Redevelopment activities are proposed to begin
in 2018 with completion in 2019. This TIF Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in
Subsection 3-4 of the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area.
The activities contemplated in the Modification to the Redevelopment Plan and the TIF Plan do not preclude
the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated
to occur over the life of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the District.
Subsection 2-4. Redevelopment Plan Overview
Pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and authorizing state statutes, the HRA or City is authorized to undertake
the following activities within the District:
1. Property to be Acquired - The HRA or City currently owns nine parcels of property within
the District and is further described in this TIF Plan.
2. Relocation - Relocation services, to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to
M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws.
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-1
3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary
legal requirements, the HRA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that it may
acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer.
4. The HRA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, construction,
relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public street work within the District.
Subsection 2-5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired
The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the
parcels listed in Appendix C of this TIF Plan. Please also see the map in Appendix B for further information
on the location of the District.
The HRA or City currently owns the property to be included in the District.
Subsection 2-6. Classification of the District
The HRA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with
M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, as amended, inclusive, find that the District, to be established, is a
redevelopment district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1) as defined below:
(a) "Redevelopment district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a project,
or portions of a project, within which the authority finds by resolution that one or more of the
following conditions, reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists:
(1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the district are occupied by buildings, streets,
utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and more than 50 percent
of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree
requiring substantial renovation or clearance;
(2) The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently
used rail yards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way;
(3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined
in Section 115C, Subd. 15, if the tank facility:
(i) have or had a capacity of more than one million gallons;
(ii) are located adjacent to rail facilities; or
(iii)have been removed, or are unused, underused, inappropriately used or infrequently
used; or
(4) a qualifying disaster area, as defined in Subd. 10b.
M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1) continued:
(b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in
structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and
ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-2
similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial
renovation or clearance.
(c) A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable
to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15
percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the
site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard
under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size,
type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or
other similar reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without
an interior inspection of the property, but need not have an independent, expert appraisal
prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. An interior inspection of the
property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable
to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that
owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion
that the building is structurally substandard.
(d) A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building for purposes of the
finding under paragraph (a) or by the improvement described in paragraph (e) if all of the
following conditions are met:
(1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building or met the requirements of paragraph
(e), as the case may be, within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the
parcel as part of the district with the county auditor;
(2) the substandard building or the improvements described in paragraph (e) were demolished
or removed by the authority or the demolition or removal was financed by the authority or
was done by a developer under a development agreement with the authority;
(3) the authority found by resolution before the demolition or removal that the parcel was
occupied by a structurally substandard building or met the requirement of paragraph (e) and
that after demolition and clearance the authority intended to include the parcel within a
district; and
(4) upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district,
the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be
adjusted as provided by § 469.177, subdivision 1, paragraph (f).
(e) For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved
or gravel parking lots or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of
M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1) continued:
the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar
structures.
(f) For districts consisting of two or more noncontiguous areas, each area must qualify as a
redevelopment district under paragraph (a) to be included in the district, and the entire area of
the district must satisfy paragraph (a).
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-3
In meeting the statutory criteria the HRA and City rely on the following facts and findings:
• The District is a redevelopment district consisting of nine parcels.
• An inventory shows that parcels consisting of more than 70 percent of the area in the District are
occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures.
• An inspection of the buildings located within the District finds that more than 50 percent of the buildings
are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act. (See Appendix F).
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that
qualified under the provisions of M.S., Sections 273.111, 273.112, or 273.114 or Chapter 473H for taxes
payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District.
Subsection 2-7. Duration and First Year of Tax Increment of the District
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration and first year of tax
increment of the District must be indicated within the TIF Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 1b.,
the duration of the District will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the HRA or City (a total of
26 years of tax increment collection). The HRA or City elects to receive the first tax increment in 2020,
which is no later than four years following the year of approval of the District.
Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the TIF Plan for subsequent phases or
other changes, would terminate after 2045, or when the TIF Plan is satisfied. The HRA or City reserves the
right to decertify the District prior to the legally required date.
Subsection 2-8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity
Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 7 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity
(ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor
in 2016 for taxes payable 2017.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning
in the payment year 2020) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of:
1. Change in tax exempt status of property;
2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district;
3. Change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements;
4. Change in the use of the property and classification;
5. Change in state law governing class rates; or
6. Change in previously issued building permits.
In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity (NTC) value of the District declines below the ONTC, no
value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the HRA or City.
The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2017, assuming the
request for certification is made before June 30, 2017. The ONTC and the Original Local Tax Rate for the
District appear in the table below.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated
Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area,
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-4
upon completion of the projects within the District, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as
shown in the table below. The HRA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity
for repayment of its obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2020. The Project
Tax Capacity (PTC) listed is an estimate of values when the projects within the District are completed.
Project Estimated Tax Capacity upon Completion (PTC) $1,558,128
Original Estimated Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) $72,509
Fiscal Disparities Contribution $147,572
Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) $1,338,047
Original Local Tax Rate 1.18213 Pay 2017
Estimated Annual Tax Increment (CTC x Local Tax Rate) $1,581,746
Percent Retained by the HRA 100%
Tax capacity includes a 3% inflation factor for the duration of the District. The tax capacity included in thischart is the estimated tax capacity of the District in year 25. The tax capacity of the District in year one isestimated to be $744,171.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the HRA shall, after a due and diligent search, accompany its
request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S.,
Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which
building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the
TIF Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase
the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building
permit was issued.
The City has reviewed the area to be included in the District and found no parcels for which building
permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the
City.
Subsection 2-9. Budgeted Sources of Revenue/Bonds to be Issued
The total estimated tax increment revenues for the District are calculated in Appendix D and are shown in
the table below:
SOURCES OF FUNDS TOTAL
Tax Increment $28,519,768
Interest $2,851,977
TOTAL $31,371,745
The costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax
increments. The HRA or City reserves the right to incur bonds or other indebtedness to help achieve the
objectives of the TIF Plan. As currently proposed, the projects within the District will be financed by a pay-
as-you-go note issued to reimburse the Developer for the funding of qualified redevelopment costs. Any
refunding amounts will be deemed a budgeted cost without a formal TIF Plan Modification. This provision
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-5
does not obligate the HRA or City to incur debt. The HRA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only
upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City.
The HRA or City may issue bonds (as defined in the TIF Act) secured in whole or in part with tax increments
from the District in a maximum principal amount of $16,692,088. Such bonds may be in the form of pay-as-
you-go notes, revenue bonds or notes, general obligation bonds, or interfund loans. This estimate of total
bonded indebtedness is a cumulative statement of authority under this TIF Plan as of the date of approval.
Further information can be found in Appendix D.
Subsection 2-10. Uses of Funds
Currently under consideration for the District is a proposal to facilitate the redevelopment and construction
of approximately 110 housing units and 32,500 square feet of retail space. The HRA and City have
determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project(s) for certain District costs, as
described.
The HRA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the
District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this TIF Plan
authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate
of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the table below. These estimates
establish the maximum amount permitted to be expended, but the City/HRA is not obligated to expend this
full amount.
USES OF TAX INCREMENT FUNDS TOTAL
Land/Building Acquisition $6,100,000
Site Improvements/Preparation $1,600,000
Utilities $1,900,000
Other Qualifying Improvements $4,240,111
Administrative Costs (up to 10%)$2,851,977
PROJECT COST TOTAL $16,692,088
Interest $14,679,657
PROJECT AND INTEREST COSTS TOTAL $31,371,745
The project cost utilizing tax increment, including financing costs (interest) listed in the table above does not
exceed the total projected tax increments for the District as shown in Subsection 2-9.
Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification
to this TIF Plan as permitted by M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 4. The cost of all activities to be considered for
tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the
applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2, no more than 25 percent of
the tax increment paid by property within the District will be spent on activities related to development or
redevelopment outside of the District but within the boundaries of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Project Area, (including administrative costs, which are considered to be spent outside of the District) subject
to the limitations as described in this TIF Plan.
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-6
Subsection 2-11. Fiscal Disparities Election
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal
disparities. If the calculations pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, (within the District) are
followed, the following method of computation shall apply:
(1) The original net tax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscal disparity
provisions of Chapter 276A or 473F. The current net tax capacity shall exclude any fiscal
disparity commercial-industrial net tax capacity increase between the original year and the
current year multiplied by the fiscal disparity ratio determined pursuant to M.S., Section
276A.06, subdivision 7 or M.S., Section 473F.08, subdivision 6. Where the original net tax
capacity is equal to or greater than the current net tax capacity, there is no captured tax capacity
and no tax increment determination. Where the original tax capacity is less than the current tax
capacity, the difference between the original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity
is the captured net tax capacity. This amount less any portion thereof which the authority has
designated, in its tax increment financing plan, to share with the local taxing districts is the
retained captured net tax capacity of the authority.
(2) The county auditor shall exclude the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority from the
net tax capacity of the local taxing districts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The
local tax rates so determined are to be extended against the retained captured net tax capacity
of the authority as well as the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts. The tax generated by
the extension of the less of (A) the local taxing district tax rates or (B) the original local tax rate
to the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority is the tax increment of the authority.
The City chooses to calculate fiscal disparities by clause b.
According to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3:
(c) The method of computation of tax increment applied to a district pursuant to paragraph (a) or
(b) shall remain the same for the duration of the district, except that the governing body may
elect to change its election from the method of computation in paragraph (a) to the method in
paragraph (b).
Subsection 2-12. Business Subsidies
M.S. Section 116J.993 to 116J.995 defines a business subsidy as a “grant, contribution of personal property,
real property, infrastructure, the principal amount of a loan at rates below those commercially available to
the recipient, any reduction or deferral of any tax or any fee, any guarantee of any payment under any loan,
lease or other obligation, or any preferential use of government facilities given to a business.” Also included
in the definition are many forms of economic assistance. Some forms of assistance, such as tax increment,
are specifically excluded from business subsidy requirements. Pursuant to M.S., Section 116J.993, Subd. 3,
the following forms of financial assistance are not considered a business subsidy:
(1) A business subsidy of less than $150,000;
(2) Assistance that is generally available to all businesses or to a general class of similar businesses,
such as a line of business, size, location, or similar general criteria;
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-7
(3) Public improvements to buildings or lands owned by the state or local government that serve a
public purpose and do not principally benefit a single business or defined group of businesses at
the time the improvements are made;
(4) Redevelopment property polluted by contaminants as defined in M.S., Section 116J.552, Subd. 3;
(5) Assistance provided for the sole purpose of renovating old or decaying building stock or bringing
it up to code and assistance provided for designated historic preservation districts, provided that
the assistance is equal to or less than 50% of the total cost;
(6) Assistance to provide job readiness and training services if the sole purpose of the assistance is
to provide those services;
(7) Assistance for housing;
(8) Assistance for pollution control or abatement, including assistance for a tax increment financing
hazardous substance subdistrict as defined under M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 23;
(9) Assistance for energy conservation;
(10) Tax reductions resulting from conformity with federal tax law;
(11) Workers' compensation and unemployment compensation;
(12) Benefits derived from regulation;
(13) Indirect benefits derived from assistance to educational institutions;
(14) Funds from bonds allocated under chapter 474A, bonds issued to refund outstanding bonds, and
bonds issued for the benefit of an organization described in section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended through December 31, 1999;
(15) Assistance for a collaboration between a Minnesota higher education institution and a business;
(16) Assistance for a tax increment financing soils condition district as defined under M.S., Section
469.174, Subd. 19;
(17) Redevelopment when the recipient's investment in the purchase of the site and in site preparation
is 70 percent or more of the assessor's current year's estimated market value;
(18) General changes in tax increment financing law and other general tax law changes of a principally
technical nature;
(19) Federal assistance until the assistance has been repaid to, and reinvested by, the state or local
government agency;
(20) Funds from dock and wharf bonds issued by a seaway port authority;
(21) Business loans and loan guarantees of $150,000 or less;
(22) Federal loan funds provided through the United States Department of Commerce, Economic
Development Administration; and
(23) Property tax abatements granted under M.S., Section 469.1813 to property that is subject to
valuation under Minnesota Rules, chapter 8100.
The HRA will comply with M.S., Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 to the extent the tax increment assistance
under this TIF Plan does not fall under any of the above exemptions.
Subsection 2-13. County Road Costs
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1a, the county board may require the HRA or City to pay for all or
part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment
will, in the judgment of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of
road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five
years under a capital improvement plan or within five years under another county plan.
The county roads in the vicinity of the District include France Avenue (County Road 17) and the portion of
50th St. W (County Road 21) located in Minneapolis, east of France Ave. The HRA and the City are aware
that the county could claim that tax increment should be used for county roads, even after the public hearing.
If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the HRA or City within forty-
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-8
five days of receipt of this TIF Plan. In the opinion of the HRA and City and consultants, the proposed
development outlined in this TIF Plan will have little or no impact upon county roads, therefore the TIF Plan
was not forwarded to the county 45 days prior to the public hearing.
Subsection 2-14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the TIF
Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the HRA or City has determined that such
development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the
fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0.
The estimated fiscal impact of the District would be as follows if the "but for" test was not met:
IMPACT ON TAX BASE IF “BUT FOR” NOT MET
2016/Pay 2017
Total Net
Tax Capacity
Estimated Captured
Tax Capacity (CTC)
Upon Completion
Percent of CTC
to Entity Total
Hennepin County 1,573,060,731 1,338,047 0.0851%
City of Edina 116,854,423 1,338,047 1.1451%
Edina ISD No. 273 97,015,332 1,338,047 1.3792%
IMPACT ON TAX RATES IF “BUT FOR” NOT MET
Pay 2017
Extension Rates
Percent
of Total
Rate
CTC
Potential
Annual
Taxes
Hennepin County 0.440870 37.29% 1,338,047 589,905
City of Edina 0.282710 23.92% 1,338,047 378,279
Edina ISD No. 273 0.347980 29.44% 1,338,047 465,614
Other 0.110570 9.35%1,338,047 147,948
Total 1.182130 100.00%1,581,747
The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity (CTC) when all construction anticipated in
Appendix A is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the actual Pay 2017 rate as obtained from
Hennepin County. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on actual Pay 2017 figures.
The District will be certified under the actual Pay 2017 rates, assuming the request for certification is made
prior to June 30, 2017.
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b):
(1) Estimate of total tax increment. It is estimated that the total amount of tax increment that will be
generated over the life of the District is $28,519,768;
(2) Probable impact of the District on City-provided services and ability to issue debt. Based upon input
from the Edina Police Department, an impact of the District on police protection is not expected. The
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-9
City Police Department does track all calls for service including property-type calls and crimes. With
any addition of new residents or businesses, police calls for service will be increased. New
developments add an increase in traffic and additional overall demands to the call load. The City does
not expect that the proposed development, in and of itself, will necessitate new capital investment.
Based upon input from the Edina Fire Department, the probable impact of the District on fire
protection is not expected to be significant. The City expects costs of inspection and that the
development to generate a minor increase in EMS calls, depending on the occupancy mix of the
residential units. Typically new buildings compliant with building and fire codes generate few fire
calls, if any, and are of superior construction beneficial to the mission of the Fire Department.
Based upon input from the Edina Engineering Department, the impact of the District on public
infrastructure is expected to be moderate. The redevelopment is not expected to require additional
infrastructure to address its impact to traffic movement in the area. Aging parking infrastructure will
be replaced with a pedestrian plaza and pedestrian-oriented woonerf, offset by public investment of
$11 million in parking infrastructure expansion to the District’s North Ramp. The operating costs
from changes in configuration of the publicly maintained spaces resulting from the redevelopment
are anticipated to remain neutral or slightly reduced. Based on the approved development plans,
costs associated with street maintenance, sweeping, plowing, lighting and sidewalks are also
expected to be neutral. The current infrastructure for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water will be
able to handle additional volume generated from the proposed development. The development in the
District is expected to contribute an estimated $740,350 in combined City and Metropolitan Council
sanitary sewer (SAC) and water (WAC) connection fees.
It is not anticipated that there will be any general obligation debt issued in relation to this project,
therefore there will be no impact on the City's ability to issue future debt or on the City's debt limit.
(3) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to school district levies. M.S. Section 469.175 Subd.
2 (b) requires the TIF Plan to calculate “the estimated amount of tax increments over the life of the
District that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district’s share of
the total local tax rate for a taxing jurisdictions remained the same.” The amount of tax increments
over the life of the district that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school
district’s share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $8,396,220.
The amount is calculated by multiplying the total estimated increment of $28, 519,768 by the percent
of the total tax rate attributable to the school district (based on the Pay 2017 tax rate) of 29.44%.
(4) Estimated amount of tax increment attributable to county levies. M.S., Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b)
requires the TIF Plan to calculate “the estimated amount of tax increments over the life of the District
that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county’s share of the total local tax rate for
all taxing jurisdictions remained the same.” The amount of tax increments over the life of the District
that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for
all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is $10,635,021. The amount is calculated by multiplying
the total estimated increment of $28,519,768 by the percent of the total tax rate attributable to the
county (based on the Pay 2017 tax rate) of 37.29%;
(5) Additional information requested by the county or school district. The City is not aware of any
standard questions in a county or school district written policy regarding tax increment districts and
impact on county or school district services. The county or school district must request additional
information pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 2(b) within 15 days after receipt of the tax
increment financing plan.
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-10
At this time, no requests for additional information from the county or school district regarding the
proposed development for the District have been received.
Subsection 2-15. Supporting Documentation
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175, Subd. 1 (a), clause 7 the TIF Plan must contain identification and
description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175, Subd.
3, clause (b)(2) and the findings that are required in the resolution approving the District. Following is a list
of reports and studies on file at the City that support the HRA and City's findings:
• Redevelopment Qualifications Report: Stantec Consulting, April 2017.
•50th and France Transportation Study: SRF Consulting Group, January 20, 2017.
• Edina Colalborative Development Transportation Study: SRF Consulting Group, March 31, 2017
•50th St. and France Avenue Neighborhood Study: SRF Consulting Group, March 31, 2017.
Subsection 2-16. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing
district include all of the following potential revenue sources:
1. Taxes paid by the captured net tax capacity, but excluding any excess taxes, as computed under M.S.,
Section 469.177;
2. The proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, to the extent the property was
purchased by the authority with tax increments;
3. Principal and interest received on loans or other advances made by the authority with tax
increments;
4. Interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments;
5. Repayments or return of tax increments made to the Authority under agreements for districts for
which the request for certification was made after August 1, 1993.
Subsection 2-17. Modifications to the District
In accordance with M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any:
1. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the District, if the reduction does not meet the
requirements of M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4(e);
2. Increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred;
3. A determination to capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original TIF
Plan;
4. Increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority;
5. Increase in the estimate of the cost of the District, including administrative expenses, that will be
paid or financed with tax increment from the District; or
6. Designation of additional property to be acquired by the Authority,
shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval
of the original TIF Plan.
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 4(f), the geographic area of the District may be reduced, but shall not
be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original net tax capacity by the county
auditor. If a redevelopment district is enlarged, the reasons and supporting facts for the determination that
the addition to the district meets the criteria of M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10, must be documented in
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-11
writing and retained. The requirements of this paragraph do not apply if (1) the only modification is
elimination of parcel(s) from the District and (2)(A) the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated
from the District equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcel(s) in the District's original net tax
capacity or (B) the HRA agrees that, notwithstanding M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the original net tax
capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the
District.
The HRA or City must notify the County Auditor of any modification to the District. Modifications to the
District in the form of a budget modification or an expansion of the boundaries will be recorded in the TIF
Plan.
Subsection 2-18. Administrative Expenses
In accordance with M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 14, administrative expenses means all expenditures of the
HRA or City, other than:
1. Amounts paid for the purchase of land;
2. Amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and
engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the
District;
3. Relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the
District;
4. Amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued
pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178; or
5. Amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance
costs described in clauses (1) to (3).
Administrative expenses also include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants,
and planning or economic development consultants. For districts for which certification was requested after
July 31, 2001, pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 3, tax increment may be used to pay any authorized
and documented administrative expenses for the District up to but not to exceed 10 percent of the total
estimated tax increment expenditures authorized by the TIF Plan or the total tax increments, as defined by
M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, clause (1), from the District, whichever is less.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the County's actual
administrative expenses incurred in connection with the District and are not subject to the percentage limits
of M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 3. The county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the
year following the year the expenses were incurred.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469. 177, Subd. 11, the County Treasurer shall deduct an amount (currently 0.36
percent) of any increment distributed to the HRA or City and the County Treasurer shall pay the amount
deducted to the State Commissioner of Management and Budget for deposit in the state general fund to be
appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting of tax increment financing information
and the cost of examining and auditing authorities' use of tax increment financing. This amount may be
adjusted annually by the Commissioner of Revenue.
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-12
Subsection 2-19. Limitation of Increment
The tax increment pledged to the payment of bonds and interest thereon may be discharged and the District
may be terminated if sufficient funds have been irrevocably deposited in the debt service fund or other escrow
account held in trust for all outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the bonds at maturity or
redemption date.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 6:
if, after four years from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of the tax increment
financing district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of
property or other site preparation, including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel
but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a
parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel
in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from
that parcel, and the original net tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original net
tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel
subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that
parcel including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the
tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor that the activity has
commenced and the county auditor shall certify the net tax capacity thereof as most recently certified
by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original net tax capacity of the tax increment
financing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions of this subdivision. The authority
must submit to the county auditor evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel
in the district. The evidence for a parcel must be submitted by February 1 of the fifth year following
the year in which the parcel was certified as included in the district. For purposes of this subdivision,
qualified improvements of a street are limited to (1) construction or opening of a new street, (2)
relocation of a street, and (3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street.
The HRA or City or a property owner must improve parcels within the District by approximately June 2021
and report such actions to the County Auditor.
Subsection 2-20. Use of Tax Increment
The HRA or City hereby determines that it will use 100 percent of the captured net tax capacity of taxable
property located in the District for the following purposes:
1. To pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to finance a project;
2. To finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs of the the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Project Area pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.001 to 469.047;
3. To pay for project costs as identified in the budget set forth in the TIF Plan;
4. To finance, or otherwise pay for other purposes as provided in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4;
5. To pay principal and interest on any loans, advances or other payments made to or on behalf of the
HRA or City or for the benefit of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area by a developer;
6. To finance or otherwise pay premiums and other costs for insurance or other security guaranteeing
the payment when due of principal of and interest on bonds pursuant to the TIF Plan or pursuant to
M.S., Chapter 462C. M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178; and
7. To accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on
the tax increment bonds or bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Chapter 462C, M.S., Sections 469.152
through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178.
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-13
These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other
purposes prohibited by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4.
Tax increments generated in the District will be paid by Hennepin County to the HRA for the Tax Increment
Fund of said District. The HRA or City will pay to the developer(s) annually an amount not to exceed an
amount as specified in a developer's agreement to reimburse the costs of land acquisition, public
improvements, demolition and relocation, site preparation, other qualifying improvements, and
administration. Remaining increment funds will be used for HRA or City administration (up to 10 percent)
and for the costs of public improvement activities outside the District.
Subsection 2-21. Excess Increments
Excess increments, as defined in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 2, shall be used only to do one or more of the
following:
1. Prepay any outstanding bonds;
2. Discharge the pledge of tax increment for any outstanding bonds;
3. Pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of any outstanding bonds; or
4. Return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in
proportion to their local tax rates.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 2, “The authority shall annually determine the amount of excess
increments for a district, if any. This determination must be based on the tax increment financing plan in
effect on December 31 of the year and the increment and other revenues received as of December 31 of the
year. The authority must spend or return the excess increments under paragraph (c) within nine months after
the end of the year.” In addition, the HRA or City may, subject to the limitations set forth herein, choose to
modify the TIF Plan in order to finance additional public costs in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project
Area or the District.
Subsection 2-22. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer
The HRA or City will review any proposal for private development within the District to determine its
conformance with the Redevelopment Plan and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate
this effort, the following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction,
mechanical, and electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage
system plan, and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the HRA or City to demonstrate the
conformance of the development with City plans and ordinances. The HRA or City may also use the
Agreements to address other issues related to the development.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 5, no more than 25 percent, by acreage, of the property to be
acquired in the District as set forth in the TIF Plan shall at any time be owned by the HRA or City as a result
of acquisition with the proceeds of bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178 to which tax increments
from property acquired is pledged, unless prior to acquisition in excess of 25 percent of the acreage, the HRA
or City concluded an agreement for the development or redevelopment of the property acquired and which
provides recourse for the HRA or City should the development or redevelopment not be completed.
Subsection 2-23. Assessment Agreements
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 8, the HRA or City may enter into a written assessment agreement
in recordable form with the developer of property within the District which establishes a minimum market
value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the District. The assessment agreement
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-14
shall be presented to the County Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements
to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are
to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears,
in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the County Assessor shall also certify the
minimum market value agreement.
Subsection 2-24. Administration of the District
Administration of the District will be handled by the HRA Executive Director.
Subsection 2-25. Annual Disclosure Requirements
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subds. 5, 6, and 6b the HRA or City must undertake financial reporting
for all tax increment financing districts to the Office of the State Auditor, County Board and County Auditor
on or before August 1 of each year. M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 5 also provides that an annual statement
shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City on or before August 15.
If the City fails to make a disclosure or submit a report containing the information required by M.S., Section
469.175 Subd. 5 and Subd. 6, the Office of the State Auditor will direct the County Auditor to withhold the
distribution of tax increment from the District.
Subsection 2-26. Reasonable Expectations
As required by the TIF Act, in establishing the District, the determination has been made that the anticipated
development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the
reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected
to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value
estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax
increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan. In making said determination,
reliance has been placed upon written representation made by the developer to such effects, and upon HRA
and City staff’s awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site(s) within the District. A
comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the District and the
use of tax increments has been performed as described above. Such analysis is included with the cashflow
in Appendix D, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less
the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the
District and the use of tax increments.
Subsection 2-27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment
1. General Limitations. All revenue derived from tax increment shall be used in accordance with the TIF
Plan. The revenues shall be used to finance, or otherwise pay public redevelopment costs of the the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.001 to 469.047. Tax
increments may not be used to circumvent existing levy limit law. No tax increment may be used for the
acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and
regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of
government or the state or federal government. This provision does not prohibit the use of revenues
derived from tax increments for the construction or renovation of a parking structure.
2. Pooling Limitations. At least 75 percent of tax increments from the District must be expended on
activities in the District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-15
activities within said district or to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. Not
more than 25 percent of said tax increments may be expended, through a development fund or otherwise,
on activities outside of the District except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced
bonds. For purposes of applying this restriction, all administrative expenses must be treated as if they
were solely for activities outside of the District.
3. Five Year Limitation on Commitment of Tax Increments. Tax increments derived from the District shall
be deemed to have satisfied the 75 percent test set forth in paragraph (2) above only if the five year rule
set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 3, has been satisfied; and beginning with the sixth year
following certification of the District, 75 percent of said tax increments that remain after expenditures
permitted under said five year rule must be used only to pay previously committed expenditures or credit
enhanced bonds as more fully set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 5.
4. Redevelopment District. At least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increment from a
redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation
of redevelopment and renewal and renovation districts under M.S., Section 469.176 Subd. 4j. These costs
include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or
improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary
to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures,
clearing of the land, the removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary for development of
the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated
administrative expenses of the HRA or City, including the cost of preparation of the development action
response plan, may be included in the qualifying costs.
Subsection 2-28. Summary
The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority is establishing the District to preserve and enhance the tax
base, redevelop substandard areas, and provide employment opportunities in the City. The TIF Plan for the
District was prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113,
telephone (651) 697-8500.
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Tax Increment Financing Plan for the 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District 2-16
Appendix A
Project Description
In 2016, the HRA released a request for development proposals seeking to revitalize and redevelop an
underutilized section of the 50th and France Commercial Area consisting of HRA-owned property and aging
public infrastructure. As a result, the HRA accepted the proposal of Edina Market Street LLC to work toward
a purchase agreement for a portion of the land in the District and to redevelop the site to complement the
City’s re-investment of an estimated $11 million expansion to the city-owned North Parking Ramp.
The 50 th and France 2 Tax Increment District is a significant redevelopment effort of the City of Edina. The
redevelopment cost is estimated to be in excess of $74 million. The project focuses on revitalizing the site
of the City’s underutilized property consisting of substandard vacant commercial property and aging public
parking structure. The redevelopment envisions new construction of a 110-unit apartment building and
32,500 square feet of mixed commercial elements supplemented with a public plaza and public underground
parking.
The redevelopment is expected to start as early as the beginning of 2018 and occur over the next two years
reaching initial occupancy in late 2019. Tax Increment from the District will be utilized in conjunction with
potential funding from the Metropolitan Council, the Department of Employment and Economic
Development, and Hennepin County to provide financing for the estimated $74 million private redevelopment
project. The HRA proposes to issue a pay-as-you-go TIF Note to the developer to reimburse qualifying costs
necessary to facilitate the redevelopment.
Appendix A-1
Appendix B
Map of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area and the 50th and France 2 TIF District
Appendix B-1
æ
¹»
¹»
æ
æ æ
æ
æ¹»æ
æ
¹º¹º
¹º
ñ
ñ
ñ
¹»æ
æ
æ
¹º
¹º
æ
æ
¹º
æ
æ
¹º
¹º
æ
æ
æ
ñ
æ
¹º
ñ
æ
ñ
TR
A
C
Y
A
V
E
VER
N
O
N
A
V
E
WO
O
D
D
A
L
E
A
V
E
HA
N
S
E
N
R
D
VA
L
L
E
Y
V
I
E
W
R
D
70TH ST W
FR
A
N
C
E
A
V
E
S
Mud Lake
Lake
Edina
Mi
r
r
o
r
L
a
k
e
Lake
Cornelia
Arrowhead
Lake
Highlands
Lake
Indianhead
Lake
M
e
l
o
d
y
L
a
k
e
Lake
Pamela
Hawkes
Lake
Harvey
Lake
Ce
n
t
e
n
n
i
a
l
L
a
k
e
Min
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
Nine Mile Cre
e
k
Nine
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
Ca
n
a
d
i
a
n
P
a
c
i
f
i
c
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
City
Hall
St Peters Lutheran
Church & School
Fire
Station
Public Works &
Park Maintenance
Grace
Church
Public
Library
Concord
School
Edina
Covenant
Cornelia
School
Colonial
Church
Highland
School
Calvary
Lutheran
Edina
High
School
Our Lady of
Grace Church
& School
Southview
Jr High
Crossview
Lutheran
Countryside
School
St Albans
Episcopal Valley View
Jr High
Creek Valley
School
Normandale
Lutheran
Colony
Park
Baptist
St Patricks
Catholic
Creek
Valley
Baptist
Normandale
Elementary
St Stephens
Episcopal
Edina
Community
Center
Golden
Years
Montessor
Calvin
Christian
School
Good
Samaritan
Methodist
Edina
Morningside
Church
Christ
Presbyterian
Church
Chapel
Hills
Congregtional
Shepard of
the Hills
Lutheran
Edina
Community
Lutheran Church
Fire
Station
BL
A
K
E
R
D
SC
H
A
E
F
E
R
R
D
VERN
O
N
A
V
E
CA
H
I
L
L
R
D
66TH ST W
YO
R
K
A
V
E
S
INTERLACHEN BLVD
MALONEY AVE
44TH S
T
W
50TH ST W
54TH ST W
58TH ST W
GL
E
A
S
O
N
R
D
70TH ST W
76TH ST W
DEWEY HILL RD
VALL
E
Y
V
I
E
W
R
D
VALLEY VIEW RD
MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W
I-494
HW
Y
1
0
0
HW
Y
1
6
9
HW
Y
1
6
9
HW
Y
1
0
0
HWY 62
HWY 62
/
Engineering Dept.
May, 2017
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area
and 50th and France 2 TIF District
Project Area
50th and France 2 TIF District
50th and France 2
TIF District
W 50TH ST
MARK ET ST
F R A N C E A
V E
H A L I F A
X A V E
1802 824140 030
1802 824140 032
1802 824140 026
1802 824140 036 1802 824140 120
1802 824140 035
1802 824140 123 1802 824140 023
1802 824140 034
/Engineer in g De pt.May, 2017
City of Edina50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District
50th and France 2 TIF District
Appendix C
Description of Property to be Included in the District
The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way and abutting roadways identified by the
parcels listed below.
Parcel Numbers Address Owner
18-028-24-14-0023 3925 49 ½ St. W. Edina HRA
18-028-24-14-0026 3930 49 ½ St. W Edina HRA
18-028-24-14-0030 3936 49 ½ St. W. Edina HRA
18-028-24-14-0032 Unassigned Edina HRA
18-028-24-14-0034 3940 49 ½ St. W. Edina HRA
18-028-24-14-0035 3944 49 ½ St. W. Edina HRA
18-028-24-14-0036 Unassigned Edina HRA
18-028-24-14-0120 Unassigned Edina HRA
18-028-24-14-0123 Unassigned Edina HRA
The property within the TIF District will be undergoing a platting process in the close of 2017 to facilitate
the new use of the property and vertical subdivision.
Appendix C-1
Appendix D
Estimated Cash Flow for the District
Appendix D-1
6/
9
/
2
0
1
7
Base Value Assumptions - Page 1
Ma
r
k
e
t
S
t
.
-
4
9
1
/
2
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
11
0
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
a
n
d
3
2
,
5
0
0
'
r
e
t
a
i
l
AS
S
U
M
P
T
I
O
N
S
A
N
D
R
A
T
E
S
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
T
y
p
e
:
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
N
a
m
e
/
N
u
m
b
e
r
:
Co
u
n
t
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
#
:
S
D
2
7
3
/
W
D
3
Ex
e
m
p
t
C
l
a
s
s
R
a
t
e
(
E
x
e
m
p
t
)
0
.
0
0
%
Fi
r
s
t
Y
e
a
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
r
I
n
f
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
V
a
l
u
e
2
0
1
8
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
P
r
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
C
l
a
s
s
R
a
t
e
(
C
/
I
P
r
e
f
.
)
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
S
p
e
c
i
f
y
N
o
.
Y
e
a
r
s
R
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
Fi
r
s
t
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
1
.
5
0
%
In
f
l
a
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
e
-
E
v
e
r
y
Y
e
a
r
:
3%
Ov
e
r
$
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
2
.
0
0
%
In
t
e
r
e
s
t
R
a
t
e
:
6.
0
0
%
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
C
l
a
s
s
R
a
t
e
(
C
/
I
)
2
.
0
0
%
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
V
a
l
u
e
D
a
t
e
:
1-
F
e
b
-
1
9
Re
n
t
a
l
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
C
l
a
s
s
R
a
t
e
(
R
e
n
t
a
l
)
1
.
2
5
%
Fi
r
s
t
P
e
r
i
o
d
E
n
d
i
n
g
1
-
A
u
g
-
1
9
A ff
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
R
e
n
t
a
l
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
C
l
a
s
s
R
a
t
e
(
A
f
f
.
R
e
n
t
a
l
)
Ta
x
Y
e
a
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
w
a
s
C
e
r
t
i
f
i
e
d
:
Pa
y
2
0
1
7
Fi
r
s
t
$
1
1
5
,
0
0
0
0
.
7
5
%
Ca
s
h
f
l
o
w
A
s
s
u
m
e
s
F
i
r
s
t
T
a
x
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
F
o
r
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
:
2
0
2
0
O
v
e
r
$
1
15
,
0
0
0
0
.
2
5
%
Ye
a
r
s
o
f
T
a
x
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
2
6
N
o
n
-
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
(
N
o
n
-
H
R
e
s
.
1
U
n
i
t
)
A ss
u
m
e
s
L
a
s
t
Y
e
a
r
o
f
T
a
x
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
2
0
4
5
F
i
r
s
t
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
.
0
0
%
Fi
s
c
a
l
D
i
s
p
a
r
i
t
i
e
s
E
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
[
O
u
t
s
i
d
e
(
A
)
,
I
n
s
i
d
e
(
B
)
,
o
r
N
A
]
In
s
i
d
e
(
B
)
Ov
e
r
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
.
2
5
%
In
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
o
r
T
o
t
a
l
F
i
s
c
a
l
D
i
s
p
a
r
i
t
i
e
s
In
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
Ho
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
C
l
a
s
s
R
a
t
e
(
H
m
s
t
d
.
R
e
s
.
)
Fi
s
c
a
l
D
i
s
p
a
r
i
t
i
e
s
C
o
n
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
i
o
3
3
.
4
3
3
5
%
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
F
i
n
a
l
F
i
r
s
t
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
.
0
0
%
Fi
s
c
a
l
D
i
s
p
a
r
i
t
i
e
s
M
e
t
r
o
-
W
i
d
e
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
1
5
0
.
0
4
9
0
%
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
F
i
n
a
l
O
v
er
$
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
.
2
5
%
Ma
x
i
m
u
m
/
F
r
o
z
e
n
L
o
c
a
l
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
:
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
F
i
n
a
l
A gr
i
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
N
o
n
-
H
o
m
e
s
t
e
a
d
1
.
0
0
%
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
L
o
c
a
l
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
:
(
U
s
e
l
e
s
s
e
r
o
f
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
o
r
M
a
x
.
)
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
Pa
y
2
0
1
7
F
i
n
a
l
St
a
t
e
-
w
i
d
e
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
(
C
o
m
m
.
/
I
n
d
.
o
n
l
y
u
s
e
d
f
o
r
t
o
t
a
l
t
a
x
e
s
)
4
5
.
8
0
20
%
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
F
i
n
a
l
Ma
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
(
U
s
e
d
f
o
r
t
o
t
a
l
t
a
x
e
s
)
0
.
1
8
7
5
9
%
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
F
i
na
l
Bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
T
o
t
a
l
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
T
a
x
Y
e
a
r
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
C
u
r
r
e
n
t
C
l
a
s
s
A
f
t
e
r
La
n
d
M
a
r
k
e
t
M
a
r
k
e
t
O
f
V
a
l
u
e
U
s
e
d
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
T
a
x
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
A
f
t
e
r
C
o
nversion
Ma
p
#
P
I
D
O
w
n
e
r
A
d
d
r
e
s
s
M
a
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
V
a
l
u
e
V
a
l
u
e
f
o
r
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
M
a
r
k
e
t
V
a
lu
e
M
a
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
C
l
a
s
s
T
a
x
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
O
r
i
g
.
T
a
x
C
a
p
.
C
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
0
3
6
H
R
A
89
8
,
4
0
0
0
8
9
8
,
4
0
0
1
0
0
%
8
9
8
,
4
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
C
/
I
P
r
e
f
.
1
7
,
2
1
8
2
C
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
0
3
2
H
R
A
1,
8
4
7
,
4
0
0
0
1
,
8
4
7
,
4
0
0
1
0
0
%
1
,
8
4
7
,
4
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
R
e
n
t
a
l
2
3
,
0
9
3
2
C
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
1
2
0
H
R
A
1,
5
1
1
,
3
0
0
0
1
,
5
1
1
,
3
0
0
1
0
0
%
1
,
5
1
1
,
3
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
2
C
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
1
2
3
H
R
A
1,
2
9
0
,
9
0
0
0
1
,
2
9
0
,
9
0
0
1
0
0
%
1
,
2
9
0
,
9
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
2
C
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
0
2
3
H
R
A
1,
0
7
1
,
0
0
0
0
1
,
0
7
1
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
1
,
0
7
1
,
0
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
2
N
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
0
2
6
H
R
A
96
2
,
0
0
0
0
9
6
2
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
9
6
2
,
0
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
1
N
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
0
3
0
H
R
A
3,
4
9
4
,
4
0
0
0
3
,
4
9
4
,
4
0
0
1
0
0
%
3
,
4
9
4
,
4
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
1
N
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
0
3
4
H
R
A
89
0
,
0
0
0
0
8
9
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
8
9
0
,
0
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
E
x
e
m
p
t
-
C
/
I
P
r
e
f
.
1
7
,
0
5
0
1
N
18
0
2
8
2
4
1
4
0
0
3
5
H
R
A
79
3
,
9
0
0
1
,
0
0
0
7
9
4
,
9
0
0
1
0
0
%
7
9
4
,
9
0
0
P
a
y
2
0
1
7
C
/
I
P
r
e
f
.
1
5
,
1
4
8
C
/
I
P
r
e
f
.
1
5
,
1
4
8
1
12
,
7
5
9
,
3
0
0
1
,
0
0
0
1
2
,
7
6
0
,
3
0
0
12
,
7
6
0
,
3
0
0
1
5
,
1
4
8
7
2
,
5
0
9
No
t
e
:
1.
B
a
s
e
v
a
l
u
e
s
a
r
e
f
o
r
p
a
y
2
0
1
7
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
C
o
u
n
t
y
w
e
bs
i
t
e
a
n
d
a
f
f
i
r
m
e
d
b
y
C
i
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
o
r
o
n
3
.
2
0
.
2
0
1
7
.
C
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
a
ss
u
m
e
d
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
Ta
x
R
a
t
e
s
B
A
S
E
V
A
L
U
E
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
(
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
T
a
x
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
)
Area/ Phase
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
E
h
l
e
r
s
&
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
-
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
O
n
l
y
N:
\
M
i
n
n
s
o
t
a
\
E
D
I
N
A
\
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
\
T
I
F
\
T
I
F
D
i
s
t
r
i
cts\50th and France 2\TIF Run 5.25.2017 - Final
6/
9
/
2
0
1
7
Base Value Assumptions - Page 2
Ma
r
k
e
t
S
t
.
-
4
9
1
/
2
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
11
0
h ou
s
i ng
u
n
i ts
a
n
d 32
,50
0
'
r
e
t
a
il
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
T
a
x
a
b
l
e
T
o
t
a
l
T
a
x
a
b
l
e
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
Pe
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
a
g
e
F
i
r
s
t
Y
e
a
r
Ma
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
M
a
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
T
o
t
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
T
a
x
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
T
a
x
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
ed
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
F
u
l
l
T
a
x
e
s
Ar
e
a
/
P
h
a
s
e
N
e
w
U
s
e
P
e
r
S
q
.
F
t
.
/
U
n
i
t
P
e
r
S
q
.
F
t
.
/
U
n
i
t
S
q
.
F
t
.
/
U
n
i
t
s
V al
u
e
C
l
a
s
s
T
a
x
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
/
U
n
i
t
2
0
1
8
2
0
1
9
2
0
2
0
2
0
2
1
P
a
y
a
b
l
e
No
r
t
h
R
e
t
a
i
l
3
6
2
3
6
2
4
,
5
4
9
1
,
6
4
4
,
6
0
0
C
/
I
P
r
e
f
.
3
2
,
1
4
2
7
.
0
7
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
2
0
2
0
No
r
t
h
R
e
t
a
i
l
3
6
2
3
6
2
4
,
2
5
0
1
,
5
3
6
,
5
0
3
C
/
I
3
0
,
7
3
0
7
.
2
3
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
2
0
2
0
Ce
n
t
e
r
R
e
t
a
i
l
3
6
2
3
6
2
2
3
,
7
2
4
8
,
5
7
6
,
9
3
8
C
/
I
1
7
1
,
5
3
9
7
.
2
3
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
2
0
2
0
Ce
n
t
e
r
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
3
7
0
,
7
3
4
3
7
0
,
7
3
4
1
1
0
4
0
,
7
8
0
,
7
9
0
R
e
n
t
a
l
5
0
9
,
7
6
0
4
,
6
3
4
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
2
0
2
0
No
r
t
h
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
R
a
m
p
4
,
4
5
6
,
4
0
0
-
1
0
E
x
e
m
p
t
0
-
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
2
0
2
0
Ce
n
t
e
r
P
l
a
z
a
/
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
3
,
8
7
3
,
2
0
0
-
1
0
E
x
e
m
p
t
0
-
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
1
0
0
%
2
0
2
0
TO
T
A
L
52
,
5
3
8
,
8
3
0
7
4
4
,
1
7
1
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
1
1
0
4
0
,
7
8
0
,
7
9
0
5
0
9
,
7
6
0
Su
b
t
o
t
a
l
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
I
n
d
.
3
2
,
5
2
3
1
1
,
7
5
8
,
0
4
0
2
3
4
,
4
1
1
No
t
e
:
1.
M
a
r
k
e
t
v
a
l
u
e
s
a
r
e
b
a
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
p
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
by
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
A
s
s
e
s
s
o
r
a
n
d
a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d
f
o
r
i
n
f
l
a
t
i
o
n
.
To
t
a
l
F
i
s
c
a
l
L
o
c
a
l
L
o
c
a
l
F
i
s
c
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
-
w
i
d
e
M
a
r
k
e
t
Ta
x
D
i
s
p
a
r
i
t
i
e
s
T
a
x
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
Di
s
p
a
r
i
t
i
e
s
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
V al
u
e
T
o
t
a
l
T
a
x
e
s
P
e
r
Ne
w
U
s
e
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ta
x
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
Ta
x
e
s
T
a
x
e
s
T
a
x
e
s
T
a
x
e
s
T
a
x
e
s
S
q
.
F
t
.
/
U
n
i
t
Re
t
a
i
l
3
2
,
1
4
2
1
0
,
7
4
6
2
1
,
3
9
6
2
5
,
2
9
3
1
6
,
1
2
5
1
4
,
7
2
2
3
,
0
8
5
5
9
,
2
2
4
1
3
.
0
2
Re
t
a
i
l
3
0
,
7
3
0
1
0
,
2
7
4
2
0
,
4
5
6
2
4
,
1
8
2
1
5
,
4
1
6
1
4
,
0
7
5
2
,
8
8
2
5
6
,
5
5
5
1
3
.
3
1
Re
t
a
i
l
1
7
1
,
5
3
9
5
7
,
3
5
1
1
1
4
,
1
8
7
1
3
4
,
9
8
4
8
6
,
0
5
5
7
8
,
5
6
8
1
6
,
0
8
9
3
1
5
,
6
9
7
1
3
.
3
1
Ho
u
s
i
n
g
5
0
9
,
7
6
0
0
5
0
9
,
7
6
0
6
0
2
,
6
0
2
0
0
7
6
,
5
0
1
6
7
9
,
1
0
3
6
,
1
7
3
.
6
6
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
R
a
m
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
Pl
a
z
a
/
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
0
0
TO
T
A
L
7
4
4
,
1
7
1
7
8
,
3
7
2
6
6
5
,
7
9
9
7
8
7
,
0
6
1
1
1
7
,
5
9
6
1
0
7
,
3
6
5
9
8
,
5
5
8
1
,
1
1
0
,
5
7
9
No
t
e
:
1.
T
a
x
e
s
a
n
d
t
a
x
i
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
l
l
v
a
r
y
s
i
g
n
f
i
c
a
n
t
l
y
f
r
o
m
y
e
a
r
t
o
y
e
a
r
d
e
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
u
p
o
n
v
a
l
u
e
s
,
r
a
t
e
s
,
s
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
,
f
i
s
c
a
l
d
i
s
p
a
r
i
t
i
es
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
f
a
c
t
o
r
s
w
h
i
c
h
c
a
n
n
o
t
b
e
p
r
e
d
i
c
t
e
d
.
To
t
a
l
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
T
a
x
e
s
1
,
1
1
0
,
5
7
9
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
M
a
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
-
E
s
t
.
1
2
,
7
6
0
,
3
0
0
le
s
s
S
t
a
t
e
-
w
i
d
e
T
a
x
e
s
(
1
0
7
,
3
6
5
)
Ne
w
M
a
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
-
E
s
t
.
6
0
,
8
6
8
,
4
3
0
le
s
s
F
i
s
c
a
l
D
i
s
p
.
A
d
j
.
(
1
1
7
,
5
9
6
)
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
4
8
,
1
0
8
,
1
3
0
le
s
s
M
a
r
k
e
t
V
a
l
u
e
T
a
x
e
s
(
9
8
,
5
5
8
)
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
V
a
l
u
e
o
f
T
a
x
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
1
2
,
2
5
3
,
1
4
9
le
s
s
B
a
s
e
V
a
l
u
e
T
a
x
e
s
(
6
6
,
1
8
4
)
D
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
3
5
,
8
5
4
,
9
8
0
An
n
u
a
l
G
r
o
s
s
T
I
F
7
2
0
,
8
7
7
Va
l
u
e
l
i
k
e
l
y
t
o
o
c
c
u
r
w
i
t
h
o
u
t
T
a
x
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
i
s
l
e
s
s
t
h
a
n
:
35
,
8
5
4
,
9
8
0
W
H
A
T
I
S
E
X
C
L
U
D
E
D
F
R
O
M
T
I
F
?
M
A
R
K
E
T
V
A
L
U
E
B
U
T
/
F
O
R
A
N
A
L
Y
S
I
S
TA
X
C
A
L
C
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
PR
O
J
E
C
T
I
N
F
O
R
M
A
T
I
O
N
(
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
T
a
x
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
)
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
E
h
l
e
r
s
&
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
-
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
O
n
l
y
N:
\
M
i
n
n
s
o
t
a
\
E
D
I
N
A
\
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
\
T
I
F
\
T
I
F
D
i
s
t
r
i
cts\50th and France 2\TIF Run 5.25.2017 - Final
6/
9
/
2
0
1
7
Tax Increment Cashflow - Page 3
Ma
r
k
e
t
S
t
.
-
4
9
1
/
2
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Ci
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
11
0
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
u
n
i
t
s
a
n
d
3
2
,
5
0
0
'
r
e
t
a
i
l
TA
X
I
N
C
R
E
M
E
N
T
C
A
S
H
F
L
O
W
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
O
r
i
g
i
n
a
l
F
i
s
c
a
l
C
a
p
t
u
r
e
d
L
o
c
a
l
A
nn
u
a
l
S
e
m
i
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
S
t
a
t
e
A
d
m
i
n
.
S
e
m
i
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
S
e
m
i
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
P
E
R
I
O
D
%
o
f
T
a
x
T
a
x
D
i
s
p
a
r
i
t
i
e
s
T
a
x
T
a
x
G
r
o
s
s
T
a
x
G
r
o
s
s
T
a
x
A
u
d
i
t
o
r
a
t
N
e
t
T
a
x
P
r
es
e
n
t
E
N
D
I
N
G
T
a
x
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
OT
C
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
C
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
l
C
a
p
ac
i
t
y
R
a
t
e
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
0
.
3
6%
1
0
%
I
n
c
r
e
m
e
n
t
V
a
l
u
e
Y
r
s
.
Y
e
a
r
D
a
t
e
-
-
-
-
0
8
/
0
1
/
1
9
-
-
-
-
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
0
10
0
%
7
4
4
,
1
7
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
6
1
,
8
5
0
)
6
0
9
,
8
1
2
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
72
0
,
8
7
7
3
6
0
,
4
3
8
(
1
,
2
9
8
)
(
3
5
,
9
1
4
)
3
2
3
,
2
2
7
2
9
5
,
7
9
8
0
.
5
2
0
2
0
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
0
10
0
%
7
4
4
,
1
7
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
6
1
,
8
5
0
)
6
0
9
,
8
1
2
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
72
0
,
8
7
7
36
0
,
4
3
8
(
1
,
2
9
8
)
(
3
5
,
9
1
4
)
3
2
3
,
2
2
7
5
8
2
,
9
8
1
1
2
0
2
0
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
1
10
0
%
7
6
6
,
4
9
6
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
6
4
,
2
0
1
)
6
2
9
,
7
8
6
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
74
4
,
4
8
9
3
7
2
,
2
4
4
(
1
,
3
4
0
)
(
3
7
,
0
9
0
)
3
3
3
,
8
1
4
8
7
0
,
9
3
2
1
.
5
2
0
2
1
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
1
10
0
%
7
6
6
,
4
9
6
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
6
4
,
2
0
1
)
6
2
9
,
7
8
6
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
74
4
,
4
8
9
37
2
,
2
4
4
(
1
,
3
4
0
)
(
3
7
,
0
9
0
)
3
3
3
,
8
1
4
1
,
1
5
0
,
4
9
6
2
2
0
2
1
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
2
10
0
%
7
8
9
,
4
9
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
6
6
,
6
2
3
)
6
5
0
,
3
5
9
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
76
8
,
8
0
9
3
8
4
,
4
0
4
(
1
,
3
8
4
)
(
3
8
,
3
0
2
)
3
4
4
,
7
1
9
1
,
4
3
0
,
7
8
4
2
.
5
2
0
2
2
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
2
10
0
%
7
8
9
,
4
9
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
6
6
,
6
2
3
)
6
5
0
,
3
5
9
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
76
8
,
8
0
9
38
4
,
4
0
4
(
1
,
3
8
4
)
(
3
8
,
3
0
2
)
3
4
4
,
7
1
9
1
,
7
0
2
,
9
0
8
3
2
0
2
2
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
3
10
0
%
8
1
3
,
1
7
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
6
9
,
1
1
7
)
6
7
1
,
5
4
9
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
79
3
,
8
5
9
3
9
6
,
9
2
9
(
1
,
4
2
9
)
(
3
9
,
5
5
0
)
3
5
5
,
9
5
0
1
,
9
7
5
,
7
1
4
3
.
5
2
0
2
3
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
3
10
0
%
8
1
3
,
1
7
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
6
9
,
1
1
7
)
6
7
1
,
5
4
9
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
79
3
,
8
5
9
39
6
,
9
2
9
(
1
,
4
2
9
)
(
3
9
,
5
5
0
)
3
5
5
,
9
5
0
2
,
2
4
0
,
5
7
4
4
2
0
2
3
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
4
10
0
%
8
3
7
,
5
7
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
7
1
,
6
8
7
)
6
9
3
,
3
7
6
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
81
9
,
6
6
0
4
0
9
,
8
3
0
(
1
,
4
7
5
)
(
4
0
,
8
3
5
)
3
6
7
,
5
1
9
2
,
5
0
6
,
0
7
8
4
.
5
2
0
2
4
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
4
10
0
%
8
3
7
,
5
7
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
7
1
,
6
8
7
)
6
9
3
,
3
7
6
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
81
9
,
6
6
0
40
9
,
8
3
0
(
1
,
4
7
5
)
(
4
0
,
8
3
5
)
3
6
7
,
5
1
9
2
,
7
6
3
,
8
4
9
5
2
0
2
4
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
5
10
0
%
8
6
2
,
6
9
8
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
7
4
,
3
3
3
)
7
1
5
,
8
5
6
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
84
6
,
2
3
5
4
2
3
,
1
1
8
(
1
,
5
2
3
)
(
4
2
,
1
5
9
)
3
7
9
,
4
3
5
3
,
0
2
2
,
2
2
6
5
.
5
2
0
2
5
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
5
10
0
%
8
6
2
,
6
9
8
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
7
4
,
3
3
3
)
7
1
5
,
8
5
6
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
84
6
,
2
3
5
42
3
,
1
1
8
(
1
,
5
2
3
)
(
4
2
,
1
5
9
)
3
7
9
,
4
3
5
3
,
2
7
3
,
0
7
7
6
2
0
2
5
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
6
10
0
%
8
8
8
,
5
7
9
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
7
7
,
0
5
8
)
7
3
9
,
0
1
2
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
87
3
,
6
0
8
4
3
6
,
8
0
4
(
1
,
5
7
2
)
(
4
3
,
5
2
3
)
3
9
1
,
7
0
8
3
,
5
2
4
,
4
9
9
6
.
5
2
0
2
6
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
6
10
0
%
8
8
8
,
5
7
9
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
7
7
,
0
5
8
)
7
3
9
,
0
1
2
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
87
3
,
6
0
8
43
6
,
8
0
4
(
1
,
5
7
2
)
(
4
3
,
5
2
3
)
3
9
1
,
7
0
8
3
,
7
6
8
,
5
9
9
7
2
0
2
6
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
7
10
0
%
9
1
5
,
2
3
6
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
7
9
,
8
6
6
)
7
6
2
,
8
6
2
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
90
1
,
8
0
2
4
5
0
,
9
0
1
(
1
,
6
2
3
)
(
4
4
,
9
2
8
)
4
0
4
,
3
5
0
4
,
0
1
3
,
2
3
7
7
.
5
2
0
2
7
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
7
10
0
%
9
1
5
,
2
3
6
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
7
9
,
8
6
6
)
7
6
2
,
8
6
2
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
90
1
,
8
0
2
45
0
,
9
0
1
(
1
,
6
2
3
)
(
4
4
,
9
2
8
)
4
0
4
,
3
5
0
4
,
2
5
0
,
7
5
0
8
2
0
2
7
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
8
10
0
%
9
4
2
,
6
9
3
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
8
2
,
7
5
7
)
7
8
7
,
4
2
7
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
93
0
,
8
4
1
4
6
5
,
4
2
1
(
1
,
6
7
6
)
(
4
6
,
3
7
5
)
4
1
7
,
3
7
1
4
,
4
8
8
,
7
7
1
8
.
5
2
0
2
8
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
8
10
0
%
9
4
2
,
6
9
3
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
8
2
,
7
5
7
)
7
8
7
,
4
2
7
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
93
0
,
8
4
1
46
5
,
4
2
1
(
1
,
6
7
6
)
(
4
6
,
3
7
5
)
4
1
7
,
3
7
1
4
,
7
1
9
,
8
5
9
9
2
0
2
8
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
9
10
0
%
9
7
0
,
9
7
4
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
8
5
,
7
3
6
)
8
1
2
,
7
3
0
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
96
0
,
7
5
2
4
8
0
,
3
7
6
(
1
,
7
2
9
)
(
4
7
,
8
6
5
)
4
3
0
,
7
8
2
4
,
9
5
1
,
4
2
6
9
.
5
2
0
2
9
0
8
/
0
1
/
2
9
10
0
%
9
7
0
,
9
7
4
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
8
5
,
7
3
6
)
8
1
2
,
7
3
0
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
96
0
,
7
5
2
48
0
,
3
7
6
(
1
,
7
2
9
)
(
4
7
,
8
6
5
)
4
3
0
,
7
8
2
5
,
1
7
6
,
2
4
7
1
0
2
0
2
9
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
0
10
0
%
1
,
0
0
0
,
1
0
3
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
8
8
,
8
0
4
)
8
3
8
,
7
9
1
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
99
1
,
5
6
0
4
9
5
,
7
8
0
(
1
,
7
8
5
)
(
4
9
,
4
0
0
)
4
4
4
,
5
9
6
5
,
4
0
1
,
5
2
0
1
0
.
5
2
0
3
0
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
0
10
0
%
1
,
0
0
0
,
1
0
3
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
8
8
,
8
0
4
)
8
3
8
,
7
9
1
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
99
1
,
5
6
0
49
5
,
7
8
0
(
1
,
7
8
5
)
(
4
9
,
4
0
0
)
4
4
4
,
5
9
6
5
,
6
2
0
,
2
3
2
1
1
2
0
3
0
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
1
10
0
%
1
,
0
3
0
,
1
0
6
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
9
1
,
9
6
3
)
8
6
5
,
6
3
4
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
0
2
3
,
2
9
2
5
1
1
,
6
4
6
(
1
,
8
4
2
)
(
5
0
,
9
8
0
)
4
5
8
,
8
2
4
5
,
8
3
9
,
3
6
9
1
1
.
5
2
0
3
1
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
1
10
0
%
1
,
0
3
0
,
1
0
6
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
9
1
,
9
6
3
)
8
6
5
,
6
3
4
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
0
2
3
,
2
9
2
51
1
,
6
4
6
(
1
,
8
4
2
)
(
5
0
,
9
8
0
)
4
5
8
,
8
2
4
6
,
0
5
2
,
1
2
3
1
2
2
0
3
1
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
2
10
0
%
1
,
0
6
1
,
0
0
9
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
9
5
,
2
1
8
)
8
9
3
,
2
8
3
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
0
5
5
,
9
7
7
5
2
7
,
9
8
8
(
1
,
9
0
1
)
(
5
2
,
6
0
9
)
4
7
3
,
4
7
9
6
,
2
6
5
,
2
7
8
1
2
.
5
2
0
3
2
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
2
10
0
%
1
,
0
6
1
,
0
0
9
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
9
5
,
2
1
8
)
8
9
3
,
2
8
3
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
0
5
5
,
9
7
7
52
7
,
9
8
8
(
1
,
9
0
1
)
(
5
2
,
6
0
9
)
4
7
3
,
4
7
9
6
,
4
7
2
,
2
2
5
1
3
2
0
3
2
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
3
10
0
%
1
,
0
9
2
,
8
4
0
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
9
8
,
5
7
0
)
9
2
1
,
7
6
1
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
0
8
9
,
6
4
2
5
4
4
,
8
2
1
(
1
,
9
6
1
)
(
5
4
,
2
8
6
)
4
8
8
,
5
7
3
6
,
6
7
9
,
5
4
9
1
3
.
5
2
0
3
3
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
3
10
0
%
1
,
0
9
2
,
8
4
0
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
9
8
,
5
7
0
)
9
2
1
,
7
6
1
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
0
8
9
,
6
4
2
54
4
,
8
2
1
(
1
,
9
6
1
)
(
5
4
,
2
8
6
)
4
8
8
,
5
7
3
6
,
8
8
0
,
8
3
5
1
4
2
0
3
3
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
4
10
0
%
1
,
1
2
5
,
6
2
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
0
2
,
0
2
3
)
9
5
1
,
0
9
4
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
1
2
4
,
3
1
6
5
6
2
,
1
5
8
(
2
,
0
2
4
)
(
5
6
,
0
1
3
)
5
0
4
,
1
2
1
7
,
0
8
2
,
4
7
7
1
4
.
5
2
0
3
4
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
4
10
0
%
1
,
1
2
5
,
6
2
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
0
2
,
0
2
3
)
9
5
1
,
0
9
4
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
1
2
4
,
3
1
6
56
2
,
1
5
8
(
2
,
0
2
4
)
(
5
6
,
0
1
3
)
5
0
4
,
1
2
1
7
,
2
7
8
,
2
4
6
1
5
2
0
3
4
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
5
10
0
%
1
,
1
5
9
,
3
9
4
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
0
5
,
5
7
9
)
9
8
1
,
3
0
6
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
1
6
0
,
0
3
1
5
8
0
,
0
1
6
(
2
,
0
8
8
)
(
5
7
,
7
9
3
)
5
2
0
,
1
3
5
7
,
4
7
4
,
3
5
0
1
5
.
5
2
0
3
5
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
5
10
0
%
1
,
1
5
9
,
3
9
4
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
0
5
,
5
7
9
)
9
8
1
,
3
0
6
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1,
1
6
0
,
0
3
1
58
0
,
0
1
6
(
2
,
0
8
8
)
(
5
7
,
7
9
3
)
5
2
0
,
1
3
5
7
,
6
6
4
,
7
4
3
1
6
2
0
3
5
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
6
10
0
%
1
,
1
9
4
,
1
7
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
0
9
,
2
4
2
)
1
,
0
1
2
,
4
2
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
1
9
6
,
8
1
8
5
9
8
,
4
0
9
(
2
,
1
5
4
)
(
5
9
,
6
2
5
)
5
3
6
,
6
2
9
7
,
8
5
5
,
4
5
2
1
6
.
5
2
0
3
6
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
6
10
0
%
1
,
1
9
4
,
1
7
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
0
9
,
2
4
2
)
1
,
0
1
2
,
4
2
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
1
9
6
,
8
1
8
59
8
,
4
0
9
(
2
,
1
5
4
)
(
5
9
,
6
2
5
)
5
3
6
,
6
2
9
8
,
0
4
0
,
6
0
6
1
7
2
0
3
6
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
7
10
0
%
1
,
2
3
0
,
0
0
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
1
3
,
0
1
5
)
1
,
0
4
4
,
4
7
7
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
2
3
4
,
7
0
8
6
1
7
,
3
5
4
(
2
,
2
2
2
)
(
6
1
,
5
1
3
)
5
5
3
,
6
1
8
8
,
2
2
6
,
0
5
9
1
7
.
5
2
0
3
7
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
7
10
0
%
1
,
2
3
0
,
0
0
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
1
3
,
0
1
5
)
1
,
0
4
4
,
4
7
7
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
2
3
4
,
7
0
8
61
7
,
3
5
4
(
2
,
2
2
2
)
(
6
1
,
5
1
3
)
5
5
3
,
6
1
8
8
,
4
0
6
,
1
1
0
1
8
2
0
3
7
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
8
10
0
%
1
,
2
6
6
,
9
0
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
1
6
,
9
0
1
)
1
,
0
7
7
,
4
9
1
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
2
7
3
,
7
3
5
6
3
6
,
8
6
7
(
2
,
2
9
3
)
(
6
3
,
4
5
7
)
5
7
1
,
1
1
7
8
,
5
8
6
,
4
4
2
1
8
.
5
2
0
3
8
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
8
10
0
%
1
,
2
6
6
,
9
0
1
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
1
6
,
9
0
1
)
1
,
0
7
7
,
4
9
1
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
2
7
3
,
7
3
5
63
6
,
8
6
7
(
2
,
2
9
3
)
(
6
3
,
4
5
7
)
5
7
1
,
1
1
7
8
,
7
6
1
,
5
2
2
1
9
2
0
3
8
0
2
/
0
1
/
3
9
10
0
%
1
,
3
0
4
,
9
0
8
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
2
0
,
9
0
4
)
1
,
1
1
1
,
4
9
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
3
1
3
,
9
3
2
6
5
6
,
9
6
6
(
2
,
3
6
5
)
(
6
5
,
4
6
0
)
5
8
9
,
1
4
1
8
,
9
3
6
,
8
6
7
1
9
.
5
2
0
3
9
0
8
/
0
1
/
3
9
10
0
%
1
,
3
0
4
,
9
0
8
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
2
0
,
9
0
4
)
1
,
1
1
1
,
4
9
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
3
1
3
,
9
3
2
65
6
,
9
6
6
(
2
,
3
6
5
)
(
6
5
,
4
6
0
)
5
8
9
,
1
4
1
9
,
1
0
7
,
1
0
5
2
0
2
0
3
9
0
2
/
0
1
/
4
0
10
0
%
1
,
3
4
4
,
0
5
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
2
5
,
0
2
7
)
1
,
1
4
6
,
5
2
0
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
3
5
5
,
3
3
6
6
7
7
,
6
6
8
(
2
,
4
4
0
)
(
6
7
,
5
2
3
)
6
0
7
,
7
0
5
9
,
2
7
7
,
5
9
2
2
0
.
5
2
0
4
0
0
8
/
0
1
/
4
0
10
0
%
1
,
3
4
4
,
0
5
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
2
5
,
0
2
7
)
1
,
1
4
6
,
5
2
0
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
3
5
5
,
3
3
6
67
7
,
6
6
8
(
2
,
4
4
0
)
(
6
7
,
5
2
3
)
6
0
7
,
7
0
5
9
,
4
4
3
,
1
1
4
2
1
2
0
4
0
0
2
/
0
1
/
4
1
10
0
%
1
,
3
8
4
,
3
7
7
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
2
9
,
2
7
3
)
1
,
1
8
2
,
5
9
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
3
9
7
,
9
8
1
6
9
8
,
9
9
1
(
2
,
5
1
6
)
(
6
9
,
6
4
7
)
6
2
6
,
8
2
7
9
,
6
0
8
,
8
7
1
2
1
.
5
2
0
4
1
0
8
/
0
1
/
4
1
10
0
%
1
,
3
8
4
,
3
7
7
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
2
9
,
2
7
3
)
1
,
1
8
2
,
5
9
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
3
9
7
,
9
8
1
69
8
,
9
9
1
(
2
,
5
1
6
)
(
6
9
,
6
4
7
)
6
2
6
,
8
2
7
9
,
7
6
9
,
8
0
1
2
2
2
0
4
1
0
2
/
0
1
/
4
2
10
0
%
1
,
4
2
5
,
9
0
8
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
3
3
,
6
4
7
)
1
,
2
1
9
,
7
5
3
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
4
4
1
,
9
0
6
7
2
0
,
9
5
3
(
2
,
5
9
5
)
(
7
1
,
8
3
6
)
6
4
6
,
5
2
2
9
,
9
3
0
,
9
5
2
2
2
.
5
2
0
4
2
0
8
/
0
1
/
4
2
10
0
%
1
,
4
2
5
,
9
0
8
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
3
3
,
6
4
7
)
1
,
2
1
9
,
7
5
3
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
4
4
1
,
9
0
6
72
0
,
9
5
3
(
2
,
5
9
5
)
(
7
1
,
8
3
6
)
6
4
6
,
5
2
2
1
0
,
0
8
7
,
4
0
9
2
3
2
0
4
2
0
2
/
0
1
/
4
3
10
0
%
1
,
4
6
8
,
6
8
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
3
8
,
1
5
2
)
1
,
2
5
8
,
0
2
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
4
8
7
,
1
4
9
7
4
3
,
5
7
4
(
2
,
6
7
7
)
(
7
4
,
0
9
0
)
6
6
6
,
8
0
8
1
0
,
2
4
4
,
0
7
6
2
3
.
5
2
0
4
3
0
8
/
0
1
/
4
3
10
0
%
1
,
4
6
8
,
6
8
5
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
3
8
,
1
5
2
)
1
,
2
5
8
,
0
2
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
4
8
7
,
1
4
9
74
3
,
5
7
4
(
2
,
6
7
7
)
(
7
4
,
0
9
0
)
6
6
6
,
8
0
8
1
0
,
3
9
6
,
1
8
0
2
4
2
0
4
3
0
2
/
0
1
/
4
4
10
0
%
1
,
5
1
2
,
7
4
6
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
4
2
,
7
9
2
)
1
,
2
9
7
,
4
4
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
5
3
3
,
7
4
9
7
6
6
,
8
7
4
(
2
,
7
6
1
)
(
7
6
,
4
1
1
)
6
8
7
,
7
0
2
1
0
,
5
4
8
,
4
8
0
2
4
.
5
2
0
4
4
0
8
/
0
1
/
4
4
10
0
%
1
,
5
1
2
,
7
4
6
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
4
2
,
7
9
2
)
1
,
2
9
7
,
4
4
5
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
5
3
3
,
7
4
9
76
6
,
8
7
4
(
2
,
7
6
1
)
(
7
6
,
4
1
1
)
6
8
7
,
7
0
2
1
0
,
6
9
6
,
3
4
5
2
5
2
0
4
4
0
2
/
0
1
/
4
5
10
0
%
1
,
5
5
8
,
1
2
8
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
4
7
,
5
7
2
)
1
,
3
3
8
,
0
4
8
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
5
8
1
,
7
4
7
7
9
0
,
8
7
3
(
2
,
8
4
7
)
(
7
8
,
8
0
3
)
7
0
9
,
2
2
4
1
0
,
8
4
4
,
3
9
6
2
5
.
5
2
0
4
5
0
8
/
0
1
/
4
5
10
0
%
1
,
5
5
8
,
1
2
8
(
7
2
,
5
0
9
)
(
1
4
7
,
5
7
2
)
1
,
3
3
8
,
0
4
8
1
1
8
.
2
1
3
%
1
,
5
8
1
,
7
4
7
79
0
,
8
7
3
(
2
,
8
4
7
)
(
7
8
,
8
0
3
)
7
0
9
,
2
2
4
1
0
,
9
8
8
,
1
3
4
2
6
2
0
4
5
0
2
/
0
1
/
4
6
T
o
t
a
l
28
,
6
2
2
,
8
1
0
(
1
0
3
,
0
4
2
)
(
2
,
8
5
1
,
9
7
7
)
2
5
,
6
6
7
,
7
9
1
Pr
e
s
e
n
t
V
a
l
u
e
F
r
o
m
0
2
/
0
1
/
2
0
1
9
P
r
e
s
e
n
t
V
a
l
u
e
R
a
t
e
6
.
0
0
%
12
,
2
5
3
,
1
4
9
(
4
4
,
1
1
1
)
(
1
,
2
2
0
,
9
0
4
)
1
0
,
9
8
8
,
1
3
4
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
b
y
E
h
l
e
r
s
&
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
-
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
s
O
n
l
y
N:
\
M
i
n
n
s
o
t
a
\
E
D
I
N
A
\
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
R
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
\
T
I
F
\
T
I
F
D
i
s
t
r
i
cts\50th and France 2\TIF Run 5.25.2017 - Final
Appendix E
Minnesota Business Assistance Form
(Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development)
A Minnesota Business Assistance Form (MBAF) should be used to report and/or update each calendar year's
activity by April 1 of the following year.
Please see the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) website at
http://www.deed.state.mn.us/Community/subsidies/MBAFForm.htm for information and forms.
Appendix E-1
Appendix F
Redevelopment Qualifications for the District
Appendix F-1
Final Report of
Inspection Procedures and Results
For
Determining Qualifications of a
Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District
as a Redevelopment District
Edina HRA
Proposed TIF District
Edina, Minnesota
Stantec Project No. 193804505
April 13, 2017
Page 2
Table of Contents
PART 1 Executive Summary 3
Purpose of Evaluation 3
Scope of Work 3
Conclusion 4
PART 2 Minnesota Statute 469.174, Subdivision 10 Requirements 4
PART 3 Procedures Followed 6
PART 4 Findings 7
A. Coverage Test 7
B. Condition of Building Test 8
1. Replacement Cost 8
2. Code Deficiencies 8
3. System Condition Deficiencies 9
C. Distribution of Substandard Structures 11
D. Conclusion 11
PART 5 Team Credentials 12
APPENDIX A Map of Proposed TIF District
Hennepin County Property Maps
APPENDIX B Building Code and Condition Deficiencies Reports
APPENDIX C Code Deficiency Estimated Replacement Costs
APPENDIX D Photographs
Page 3
PART 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PURPOSE OF EVALUATION
Stantec was retained by the City of Edina HRA to inspect and evaluate the properties
within a Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District (“TIF District”) proposed to be
established by the City. The proposed TIF District is located in the City of Edina, in a
general area between Halifax Avenue on the west, France Avenue on the east, and on
both sides of 49-1/2 Street West (Figure 1). The purpose of Stantec’s work was to
determine whether the proposed district meets the statutory requirements for
coverage, and whether buildings on nine different parcels, located within the proposed
TIF District, meet the qualifications required for a Redevelopment District.
Figure 1 – Proposed TIF District
SCOPE OF WORK
The proposed district consists of nine (9) parcels containing two (2) parking ramps, one
(1) commercial building, one (1) on-grade parking lot, and one (1) vacant lot.
All the buildings in the proposed district received an onsite interior and exterior
inspection. Building Code and Condition Deficiency Reports for each building
inspected by Stantec are in Appendix B.
Page 4
CONCLUSION
After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the proposed TIF District and
applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment District under Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, it is our professional opinion that the proposed
TIF District does qualify as a Redevelopment District.
The remainder of this report describes our process and findings in detail.
PART 2 – MINNESOTA STATUTE 469.174, SUBDIVISION 10 REQUIREMENTS
The properties were inspected in accordance with the following requirements under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, which states:
Interior Inspection
"The municipality may not make such determination [that the building is structurally
substandard] without an interior inspection of the property..."
Exterior Inspection and Other Means
"An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1)
the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its
best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property;
and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building
is structurally substandard."
Documentation
"Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was
not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3(1)."
Qualification Requirements
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a)requires two tests for occupied
parcels:
1. Coverage Test
”…parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by
buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.”
The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined
under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which states: " For
purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets,
utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures unless 15 percent
of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel
parking lots, or other similar structures.”
Page 5
2. Condition of Building Test
…”and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are
structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or
clearance;”
1. Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
Subdivision 10(b), which states: “For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally
substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a
combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and
ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition
of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of
sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance.”
Definition of Substantial Renovation
Because "Substantial renovation" can mean different things to different
people, Stantec has attempted to clarify exactly what we consider to be
"substantial renovation" as it relates to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
Subdivision 10(a) (1).
a. First, we researched national standards as to how much building owners
should budget for annual maintenance and repair on their buildings as a
percentage of replacement cost of the building.
1. According to the University of California "Facilities Renewal Budget
Model" report of 1999, building owners should budget between two
and three percent of current replacement value of their buildings for
maintenance and repair work. This does not include routine janitorial
work and routine items such as changing light bulbs and filters.
2. According to the Building Research Board of the National Research
Council, one and one-half to three percent of a building's
replacement value should be budgeted for maintenance and repair.
b. Based on this information, Stantec utilized two and one-half percent as
the desired amount of maintenance and repair that should be budgeted
annually to keep a building in good working condition. We recognize
through experience that only a small percentage of sophisticated
building owners actually budget for and spend this amount of money
every year on maintenance and repair. This is because most business
owners are driven by other budgetary issues and tend to neglect the
building maintenance and repair line items in their annual budgets.
c. By establishing how much a building owner should be budgeting per year
for maintenance and repairs, Stantec believes we could more easily
establish an amount that would be considered "substantial" in
comparison. If an owner is budgeting 2.5 percent of the building's
replacement cost annually, most business owners or home owners would
have to take out a loan to cover the cost of a substantial building
Page 6
improvement. Assuming they had a fixed level of income to work with,
they would have to keep the loan payment at a level very near the
original 2.5 percent they should have been budgeting each year. In
addition, they still would have to budget for the original 2.5 percent on
top of the loan. In most cases, the mortgage terms would have to extend
out to a point beyond the life expectancy of the building they were trying
to improve, as most buildings built in the past fifty years are not designed
to last beyond 40 years.
d. Based on the calculations described above, we have defined substantial
renovation for purposes of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision
10(c), as renovation with costs exceeding 15 percent of the building's
replacement value.
2. Buildings are not eligible to be considered structurally substandard unless they
meet certain additional criteria, as set forth in Subdivision 10(c) which states:
"A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the
building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the
building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a
new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The
municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally
substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably
available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the
average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar
reliable evidence."
"Items of evidence that support such a conclusion include recent fire or
police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections,
exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence."
PART 3 – PROCEDURES FOLLOWED
Stantec performed interior and exterior inspections for both parking ramps and the
one commercial building within the proposed TIF District on February 7, 2017. Visual
observations were made of all levels of all properties and structures, with physical
measurements taken where necessary. Area calculations and construction data
are based upon information from various sources, as noted.
Page 7
PART 4 – FINDINGS
A. Coverage Test
1. The total square foot area of each parcel in the proposed TIF District was
obtained from Hennepin County Property Map GIS mapping, and site
verification.
2. The total square foot area of buildings and site improvements on the parcels
in the proposed TIF District was obtained from City records, Hennepin County
Property Map GIS mapping, and site verification.
3. The percentage of coverage for each parcel in the proposed TIF District was
computed to determine if the 15 percent minimum requirement was met. The
total square footage of parcels meeting the 15 percent requirement was
divided into the total square footage of the entire district to determine if the
70 percent requirement was met.
Findings:
The proposed TIF District met the coverage test under Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(e), which resulted in parcels consisting of 88.8
percent of the area of the proposed TIF District being occupied by buildings,
streets, utilities or paved drives or parking lots (Figure 2). This exceeds the 70
percent area coverage requirement for the proposed TIF District under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(a) (1).
Figure 2 – Coverage Test Aerial View
Page 8
B. Condition of Building Test
1. Replacement Cost
The first step in evaluating a building to determine if it is substandard to a degree
requiring substantial renovation or clearance is to determine its replacement
cost.
This is the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and
type on site. Replacement costs were researched using R.S. Means Cost Works
square foot models for 2017.
A replacement cost was calculated by first establishing building use (office,
retail, residential, etc.), building construction type (wood, concrete, masonry,
etc.), and building size to obtain the appropriate median replacement cost,
which factors in the costs of construction in Edina, Minnesota.
Replacement cost includes labor, materials, and the contractor's overhead and
profit. Replacement costs do not include architectural fees, legal fees or other
“soft" costs not directly related to construction activities. Replacement cost for
each building is tabulated in Appendix C.
2. Code Deficiencies
The next step in evaluating a building is to determine what code deficiencies
exist with respect to such building. Code deficiencies are those conditions for a
building which are not in compliance with current building codes applicable to
new buildings in the State of Minnesota.
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), specifically provides that
a building cannot be considered structurally substandard if its code deficiencies
are not at least 15 percent of the replacement cost of the building. Thus, it was
necessary to determine the extent of code deficiencies for each building in the
proposed TIF District.
The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information with respect to
such buildings contained in City Building Inspection records and making interior
and exterior inspections of the buildings. Stantec utilized the 2015 Minnesota
State Building Code as the official code for our evaluations. The Minnesota State
Building Code is a series of provisional codes written specifically for Minnesota
only requirements, adoption of several international codes, and amendments to
the adopted international codes.
After identifying the code deficiencies in each building, we used R.S. Means Cost
Works 2017; Unit and Assembly Costs to determine the cost of correcting the
identified deficiencies. We were then able to compare the correction costs with
the replacement cost of each building to determine if the costs for correcting
code deficiencies meet the required 15 percent threshold.
Page 9
Finding:
Two (2) of the three (3) buildings/structures (67 percent) in the proposed TIF
District contained code deficiencies exceeding the 15 percent threshold
required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c). A complete
Building Code and Condition Deficiency report for each building/structure in the
proposed TIF District can be found in Appendix B of this report.
3. System Condition Deficiencies
System condition deficiencies are a measurement of defects or substantial
deterioration in site elements, structure, exterior envelope, mechanical and
electrical components, fire protection and emergency systems, interior partitions,
ceilings, floors, and doors.
The evaluation was made by reviewing all available information contained in
City records, and making interior and exterior inspections of the buildings.
Stantec only identified system condition deficiencies that were visible upon our
inspection of the building or contained in City records. We did not consider the
amount of "service life" used up for a particular component unless it was an
obvious part of that component's deficiencies.
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), provides for the minimum
threshold of code deficiencies that must be met in order to consider a building
substandard. If a building meets the minimum code deficiency threshold under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10(c), then in order for such
building to be "structurally substandard" under Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.174, Subdivision 10(b), the building's defects or deficiencies should be of
sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." Based
on this definition, Stantec re-evaluated each of the buildings that met the code
deficiency threshold under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision
10(c), to determine if the total deficiencies warranted "substantial renovation or
clearance" based on the criteria we outlined above.
Finding:
In our professional opinion, two (2) of the three (3) buildings/structures (67
percent) in the proposed TIF District are structurally substandard to a degree
requiring substantial renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural
elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light
and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition
of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of
sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance as
described below:
Page 10
Hooten Cleaners – 3944 49-1/2 Street West – Parcel 1802824 140035
This building was found to be structurally substandard with code deficiencies
that exceed the 15 percent of the building replacement value criteria as
defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 (b) and (c).
Edina Public Parking Ramp – 3925 49-1/2 Street West – Parcels 1802824 140032,
1802824 140120, 1802824 140123, and 1802824 140023
This parking ramp was found to be structurally substandard with significant
code deficiencies that exceed the 15 percent of the building replacement
value criteria as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision
10 (b) and (c).
50th & France Parking Ramp – 3936/3940 49-1/2 Street West – Parcels 1802824
140030 and 1802824 140034
This parking ramp has code and condition deficiencies, but they are not
significant enough to reach the required 15 percent of building replacement
value criteria as defined by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision
10 (b) and (c).
Page 11
C. Distribution of Substandard Structures
Much of this report has focused on the condition of individual buildings as they
relate to requirements identified by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
Subdivision 10. It is also important to look at the distribution of substandard
buildings throughout the geographic area of the proposed TIF District.
Finding:
The substandard buildings are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic
area of the proposed TIF District (Figure 3).
Figure 3 – Distribution of Substandard Structures (shown shaded green)
D. CONCLUSION
After inspecting and evaluating the properties within the proposed TIF District
and applying current statutory criteria for a Redevelopment District under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10a, it is our professional opinion
that the proposed TIF District does qualify as a Redevelopment District.
The remainder of this report describes our process and findings in detail.
Page 12
PART 5 – TEAM CREDENTIALS
Bruce P. Paulson, AIA – Senior Project Manager/Inspector
Bruce has more than 41 years of architectural experience as project architect,
project manager, and project designer for municipal, governmental, educational,
commercial, hospitality, and healthcare clients. He is involved with all phases of the
architectural process, from pre-design through construction administration, including
specialty consulting in investigations for buildings, building condition surveys, TIF
inspections, code reviews, estimating, and specification writing.
Philip J. Caswell, P.E. – Sr. Associate/Structural Team Leader
Phil has over 30 years of engineering experience that includes structural assessment,
design, and construction of a wide variety of project types, including new buildings,
additions, building renovations, and structure demolition, as well as design and
construction of recreational facilities, dams, water and wastewater treatment and
pumping facilities and flood control projects. Phil’s project experience involves all
levels of a structure’s life cycle, from design and construction of new, to assessment
and rehabilitation or expansion of existing structures, including historic structures, to
renovation and repurposing of buildings, tanks, and facilities, to full demolition and
site restoration.
APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
CITY OF EDINA
PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT
BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT
February 7, 2017
Property ID No.: 1802824 140035
Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 2-7-17, 8:00 a.m.
Inspection Type: Interior and exterior.
General Description of Property: Commercial.
Type of Construction: Exterior masonry bearing walls; interior steel framing
Date of Construction: Original building constructed in 1949.
Structure Size(s): 3,880 SF – Main Level; 1,500 SF – Basement; 350 SF
outbuilding
Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard because:
o Substantial renovation is required to correct Conditions and
Building Code deficiencies.
Estimated Replacement Cost: $1,575,750.00
Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $336,391.20
Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 21.3%
Description of Condition Deficiencies
• Rear entrance doors are not on an accessible route. Grade is more than ½” below finish
floor line.
• Door hardware does not comply with accessibility code.
• No drinking fountain.
• No Public restroom on main level.
• Staff restrooms in basement level with no accessible route.
• Clearances at staff restroom water closets, urinal, and sinks do not comply with accessibility
code.
• Stairs to basement areas have treads and risers that do not comply with current code.
• Handrails at stairs to basement areas do not comply with current code for extension past top
and bottom nosings.
• Basement areas are accessible by stair only.
• HVAC system does not comply with current code requirements.
• Exterior masonry walls have no insulation and do not comply with current energy code
requirements.
• Exterior windows in east, north and west walls at the main and basement levels are single
pane in steel frames which do not comply with current energy code requirements.
• Based on visual observation, we suspect the existing built-up roofing system does not have
insulation in compliance with current energy code requirements.
CITY OF EDINA
PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT
BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT
February 7, 2017
Property ID No.: 1802824 140030 and 1802824 140034
Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 2-7-17, 8:00 a.m.
Inspection Type: Interior and exterior.
General Description of Property: Commercial Parking Ramp
Type of Construction: Cast-In-Place and precast concrete.
Date of Construction: Original building constructed in 1991; expansion
constructed in 1997.
Structure Size(s): 26,100 SF building footprint; 3 parking levels; 78,300 SF Total;
262 parking spaces
Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Not Substandard
because:
o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is less
than 15% of the estimated replacement cost.
Estimated Replacement Cost: $2,369,880.00
Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $10,900.00
Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 0.005%
Description of Condition Deficiencies
• Exit/entrance doors to both stairways swing out over the paver sidewalk. Current code
requires outswinging doors to have a structural stoop with frost footings to prevent heaving
which could restrict the door swing and access/egress capability.
• The current code requires 7 accessible parking spaces based on the total number of parking
spaces provided (2015 Minnesota Accessibility Code, Table 1106.1). there are currently only
6 identified accessible parking spaces provided (two per parking level).
• Limited damage to face brick veneer on columns and bollards are grade.
• Limited damage to concrete wall at guardrails near east end of ramp at sidewalk level.
CITY OF EDINA
PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT
BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT
February 7, 2017
Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824 140026 (Vacant)
Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 2-7-17, 9:00 a.m.
Inspection Type: None
Summary of Conditions: Not Applicable.
• There are no buildings on this parcel that would require an inspection.
CITY OF EDINA
PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT
BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT
February 7, 2017
Property ID No.: 1802824 140036 and west half of 1802824 140032
Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 2-7-17, 8:00 a.m.
Inspection Type: Exterior.
General Description of Property: On-grade paved parking lot.
Type of Construction: Asphalt pavement and concrete curb and gutters.
Structure Size(s): 24,880 SF; 35 parking spaces; 3 accessible spaces.
Summary of Conditions: Paved parking lot appears to be in good condition.
• There are no buildings on this parcel that would require an inspection.
CITY OF EDINA
PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT
BUILDING CONDITION AND CODE DEFICIENCIES REPORT
February 7, 2017
Property ID No.: East half of 1802824 140032, 1802824 140120, 1802824
140123, and 1802824 140023
Inspection Date(s) and Time(s): 2-7-17, 8:00 a.m.
Inspection Type: Interior and exterior.
General Description of Property: Commercial Parking Ramp
Type of Construction: Cast-In-Place and precast concrete.
Date of Construction: Constructed in 1977
Structure Size(s): 30,400 SF building footprint; 3 parking levels; 91,200 SF Total;
274 parking spaces
Summary of Deficiencies: It is our professional opinion that this building is Substandard
because:
o Estimated cost to correct building code deficiencies is more
than 15% of the estimated replacement cost.
Estimated Replacement Cost: $2,751,200.00
Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $2,751,200.00
Percentage of Replacement Cost for Building Code Deficiencies: 100%
Description of Condition Deficiencies
• Clearance height is 6’-8”.
• All parking spaces are on sloped ramps adjacent to existing stairs (3).
• Stairs do not comply with minimum clear width for egress.
• No elevator.
• No accessible route from on-grade entrances to level parking spaces that could be striped
to ADA compliance.
APPENDIX C
CITY OF EDINA
PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT
ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS
1
Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824 140026 3930 49-1/2 Street West
Vacant lot.
Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $0.00
Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824 140030/1802824 140034 3936/3940 49-1/2 St. W.
West Stair stoop upgrade
Demo existing paver sidewalk – 3 CY @ $350/CY $1,050.00
New concrete footing – 2 CY @ $375/CY $750.00
New 8” CMU walls – 56 SF @ $11.15/SF $625.00
New concrete stoop/ramp – 2.5 CY @ $350/CY $875.00
East Stair stoop upgrade
Demo existing paver sidewalk – 3 CY @ $350/CY $1,050.00
New concrete footing – 2 CY @ $375/CY $750.00
New 8” CMU walls – 56 SF @ $11.15/SF $625.00
New concrete stoop/ramp – 2.5 CY @ $350/CY $875.00
Re-stripe parking to add one additional accessible parking space $800.00
Repair damaged face brick veneer at columns and bollards $2,000.00
Repair damaged concrete wall at guardrails $1,500.00
Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $10,900.00
Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824 140035 3944 49-1/2 Street West
Front entrance stoop upgrade
Demo existing paver sidewalk – 3 CY @ $350/CY $1,050.00
New concrete footing – 2 CY @ $375/CY $750.00
New 8” CMU walls – 56 SF @ $11.15/SF $625.00
New concrete stoop/ramp – 2.5 CY @ $350/CY $875.00
Rear entrance 1 stoop upgrade
Demo existing pavement – 3 CY @ $150/CY $450.00
New concrete footing – 2 CY @ $375/CY $750.00
New 8” CMU walls – 56 SF @ $11.15/SF $624.40
New concrete stoop/ramp – 2.5 CY @ $350/CY $875.00
Rear entrance 2 stoop upgrade
Demo existing pavement – 3 CY @ $150/CY $450.00
New concrete footing – 2 CY @ $375/CY $750.00
New 8” CMU walls – 56 SF @ $11.15/SF $624.40
New concrete stoop/ramp – 2.5 CY @ $350/CY $875.00
Outbuilding entrance 3 stoop upgrade
Demo existing pavement – 3 CY @ $150/CY $450.00
New concrete footing – 2 CY @ $375/CY $750.00
New 8” CMU walls – 56 SF @ $11.15/SF $624.40
New concrete stoop/ramp – 2.5 CY @ $350/CY $875.00
Replace door knobs with lever handles – 12 @ $275/door $3,300.00
Install new dual level drinking fountain $3,000.00
Insulate exterior single-wythe masonry walls - $13/SF x 3,600 SF $46,800.00
Replace single pane glazing with thermally improved frames
and insulated glass – 704 SF @ $85/SF $59,840.00
Replace roofing system and insulation – 4,230 SF @ 15.50/SF $65,565.00
Restroom upgrade – demolition and new construction
Male Restroom – 1 water closet, 1 lavatory
60 SF @ $400/SF $24,000.00
Female Restroom – 1 water closet, 1 lavatory
60 SF @ $400/SF $24,000.00
Upgrade stairs to basement level – 44 Risers @ $600/riser $26,400.00
Replace handrails at stairs to basement level – 4 @ 26LF @ $32/LF $3,328.00
CITY OF EDINA
PROPOSED TIF DISTRICT
ESTIMATED REPLACEMENT COSTS
2
HVAC System upgrade – 5,730 SF @ $7.00/SF $40,110.00
Ventilation System upgrade – 5,730 SF @ $5.00/SF $28,650.00
Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $336,391.20
Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824 140036/1802824 140032 UNDEVELOPED
On-grade paved parking lot.
Property ID No. & Property Address: 1802824 140032/1802824 140120/1802824 140123/1802824
140023 3925 49-1/2 Street West
Replace entire parking ramp to comply with minimum headroom and provide accessible
parking spaces adjacent to an accessible route on each level
Replace stairs to comply with minimum egress width
Add new holeless hydraulic passenger elevator $2,751,200.00
Estimated Cost to Correct Building Code Deficiencies: $2,751,200.00
APPENDIX D
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Rth
Photo 1: Hooten Cleaners rear entrance north wall Photo 2: Hooten Cleaners outbuilding entrance east wall
Photo 3: Hooten Cleaners second rear entrance north wall Photo 4: Hooten Cleaners second rear entrance north wall
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 5: Hooten Cleaners west wall Photo 6: Hooten Cleaners outbuilding second entrance
Photo 7: Hooten Cleaners outbuilding west wall Photo 8: Hooten Cleaners west wall
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 9: Hooten Cleaners west wall Photo 10: Hooten Cleaners south wall
Photo 11: Hooten Cleaners south wall Photo 12: Hooten Cleaners south wall
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 13: Hooten Cleaners interior Photo 14: Hooten Cleaners interior
Photo 15: Hooten Cleaners interior Photo 16: Hooten Cleaners interior
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 5 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 17: Hooten Cleaners interior Photo 18: Hooten Cleaners interior
Photo 19: Hooten Cleaners interior roof drain line broken Photo 20: Hooten Cleaners interior
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 6 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 21: Hooten Cleaners interior Photo 22: Hooten Cleaners interior
Photo 23: Hooten Cleaners interior Photo 24: Hooten Cleaners interior basement water heates
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 7 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
`+
Photo 25: Hooten Cleaners interior basement boilers Photo 26: Hooten Cleaners interior boiler room electrical
Photo 27: Hooten Cleaners interior boiler room electrical Photo 28: Hooten Cleaners interior water softener
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 8 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 29: Hooten Cleaners interior boiler room Photo 30: Hooten Cleaners interior boilers
Photo 31: Hooten Cleaners interior basement restroom Photo 32: Hooten Cleaners interior basement restroom
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 9 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 33: Hooten Cleaners basement cleanout Photo 34: Hooten Cleaners interior basement restroom
Photo 35: Hooten Cleaners interior basement restroom Photo 36: Hooten Cleaners basement gas meter
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 10 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 37: Hooten Cleaners interior basement restroom Photo 38: Hooten Cleaners interior basement restroom
Photo 39: Hooten Cleaners interior basement restroom Photo 40: Hooten Cleaners interior basement restroom
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 11 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 41: Hooten Cleaners interior Photo 42: Hooten Cleaners basement
Photo 43: Hooten Cleaners basement Photo 44: Hooten Cleaners basement
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 45: Hooten Cleaners basement Photo 46: Hooten Cleaners basement
Photo 47: Hooten Cleaners interior Photo 48: Hooten Cleaners main level electrical
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 13 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 49: Hooten Cleaners outbuilding interior Photo 50: Hooten Cleaners outbuilding interior
Photo 51: Hooten Cleaners outbuilding interior Photo 52: Hooten Cleaners outbuilding interior
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 14 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 53: Hooten Cleaners roof Photo 54: Hooten Cleaners roof
Photo 55: Hooten Cleaners roof Photo 56: Hooten Cleaners roof
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 15 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 57: Hooten Cleaners roof Photo 58: Hooten Cleaners outbuilding south wall
Photo 59: 50th & France Parking Ramp east stair Photo 60: 50th & France Parking Ramp elevator – 3rd level
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 16 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 61: 50th & France Parking Ramp west stair roof plank Photo 62: 50th & France Parking Ramp west stair roof
Photo 63: 50th & France Parking Ramp west stair windows Photo 64: 50th & France Parking Ramp elevator – 2nd level
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 17 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 65: 50th & France Parking Ramp west stair Photo 66: 50th & France Parking Ramp elevator – 1st level
Photo 67: 50th & France Parking Ramp west stair entrance door Photo 68: 50th & France Parking Ramp – 1st level accessible
spaces
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 18 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 69: 50th & France Parking Ramp – 2nd level accessible
spaces
Photo 70: 50th & France Parking Ramp – 3rd level accessible
spaces
Photo 71: 50th & France Parking Ramp east stair entrance door Photo 72: 50th & France Parking Ramp concrete spall
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 19 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 73: 50th & France Parking Ramp concrete spall Photo 74: 50th & France Parking Ramp face brick damage
Photo 75: 50th & France Parking Ramp face brick damage Photo 76: 50th & France Parking Ramp face brick damage
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 20 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 77: On-grade parking lot Photo 78: On-grade parking lot
Photo 79: Edina Public Parking Ramp north and west sides Photo 80: Edina Public Parking Ramp north side
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 21 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 81: Edina Public Parking Ramp northwest stair Photo 82: Edina Public Parking Ramp northwest stair
Photo 83: Edina Public Parking Ramp west wall Photo 84: Edina Public Parking Ramp west entrance
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 22 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 85: Edina Public Parking Ramp southwest stair Photo 86: Edina Public Parking Ramp trash room
Photo 87: Edina Public Parking Ramp trash room Photo 88: Edina Public Parking Ramp precast double tee
deterioration
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 23 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 89: Edina Public Parking Ramp non-compliant accessible
parking spaces
Photo 90: Edina Public Parking Ramp
Photo 91: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 92: Edina Public Parking Ramp leaks at precast double
tees
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 24 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 93: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 94: Edina Public Parking Ramp stairs
Photo 95: Edina Public Parking Ramp precast double tee
deterioration
Photo 96: Edina Public Parking Ramp
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 25 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 97: Edina Public Parking Ramp precast double tee
deterioration
Photo 98: Edina Public Parking Ramp
Photo 99: Edina Public Parking Ramp trash enclosure Photo 100: Edina Public Parking Ramp west side
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 26 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 101: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 102: Edina Public Parking Ramp stairs
Photo 103: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 104: Edina Public Parking Ramp deteriorated caulk joint
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 27 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 105: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 106: Edina Public Parking Ramp
Photo 107: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 108: Edina Public Parking Ramp
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 28 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 107: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 108: Edina Public Parking Ramp
Photo 109: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 110: Edina Public Parking Ramp
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 29 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 111: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 112: Edina Public Parking Ramp
Photo 113: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 114: Edina Public Parking Ramp
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 30 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 115: Edina Public Parking Ramp southeast stair Photo 116: Edina Public Parking Ramp southeast stair caulking
Photo 117: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 118: Edina Public Parking Ramp
PROPOSED EDINA TIF DISTRICT STUDY
193804505 31 EXISTING CONDITIONS PHOTOS
Photo 119: Edina Public Parking Ramp Photo 120: Edina Public Parking Ramp
Photo 121: Edina Public Parking Ramp west entrance – 6’-8”
headroom
Photo 122: Edina Public Parking Ramp south side
Appendix G
Findings Including But/For Qualifications
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan (TIF
Plan) for 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District (District), as required pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows:
1. Finding that 50th and France 2 Tax Increment Financing District is a redevelopment district as
defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10.
The District consists of nine parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for rental housing and
commercial/industrial purposes. At least 70 percent of the area of the parcels in the District are
occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures and
more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally
substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix F of the TIF
Plan.)
2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be
expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the
increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment
financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed
development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration
of the District permitted by the TIF Plan.
The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported
by the fact that the redevelopment proposed in the TIF Plan meets the City's objectives for
redevelopment. The existing property contains vacant or substandard buildings with high costs
related to demolition, remediation and reconstruction of infrastructure. The redevelopment also
requires district-wide parking, transportation and utility infrastructure investment. With limited
amounts of property available for expansion adjacent to the existing project and height/density
limitations, and the cost of financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only through
assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The developer was asked for and provided its
proforma as justification that the developer would not have gone forward without tax increment
assistance.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of
tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the
proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the
maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This finding is justified on the grounds
that the development intensity and tax base created on currently underutilized public property
requires public improvements that are improbable without public assistance. Specifically, the cost
of site preparation, demolition, remediation, and public improvements to include underground
parking and utilities will add significantly to the total redevelopment cost of any development in this
area. Historically, site and public improvements costs necessary to sustain the required density have
made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. The City reasonably determines that
no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar
assistance being provided to the development.
Therefore, the City concludes as follows:
Appendix G-1
a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will
increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0.
b. If the proposed development occurs, the total increase in market value will be $48,108,130.
c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the
district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $12,253,149.
d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council
finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than
$35,854,980 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause c) without similar tax
increment assistance.
3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development or
redevelopment of the municipality as a whole.
The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to the
general development plan of the City.
4. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound
needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Project Area by private enterprise.
The project to be assisted by the District will result in increased employment in the City and the
State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and
add a high quality development to the City which also expands the availability of safe and decent
life-cycle housing in the City.
But-For Analysis
Current Market Value 12,760,300
New Market Value - Estimate 60,868,430
Difference 48,108,130
Present Value of Tax Increment 12,253,149
Difference 35,854,980
Value Likely to Occur Without TIF is Less Than: 35,854,980
Appendix G-2
The CITY of
EDINA
Proposed Tax Increment Financing District
50th and France 2
1) Background and Vision
2) What is TIF?
3) Why consider a new TIF?
4) Proposed TIF Plan
Edina City Council
PUBLIC HEARING
June 20, 2017
www.EdinaMN.gov
The CITY of
EDINA
-Streetcar lines
-Two-story buildings
-Undeveloped suburban lots
Background 1930s to 1950s
2
The CITY of
EDINA
Upper Left: 3906 W. 50th(now Steel Fitness), 1959
Lower Left: 5030 France Ave. (now Salut), 1959
Upper Right: Edina Theater, 1941
All images from Edina Historical Society
-A growing retail district
Background 1940s to 1950s
3
The CITY of
EDINA
-New bypass roads
(49-1/2th and 51st)
-South Ramp constructed
Background 1969-70
4
The CITY of
EDINA
-Center Ramp opens
-$3.5 M public investment
-(approx $15 M in 2017 dollars x4.35)
-New “european” style walkways
-TIF was used to finance
Background 1976
5
The CITY of
EDINA
First TIF District
- 1976 to 2009
- 143 parcels
- 18.3 acres
Background 1976
6
The CITY of
EDINA
-2 parking garages
-Many small shops
-Gas stations at
each corner
Shell
Skelly
Standard
Mobil
Background 1980
7
The CITY of
EDINA Background 1980s to 1990s
Edina Theater (multi-screen)
The Henley Condominiums
The Regency Condominiums 8
The CITY of
EDINA
-5000 France condominiums
-Adds new retail and restaurants
-Replaced small shops and restaurant
Background 2000-2007
9
The CITY of
EDINA
-Acquired properties for expansion
-Outdated, in need of redevelopment
-Clarified goal of creating vibrant streetlife
-not just more parking lots
-Began site clearance
-Issued RFP for development partner
3930 parcel, 0.37 acres
$2.6 million
3944 parcel, 0.24 acres
$1.55 million + approx. $250k in clean up
Background 2013-2016
10
The CITY of
EDINA
Partnership sought to achieve public-sector goals with private-sector expertise
Issued Request for Proposal in August 2016
Three teams interviewed in November 2016
Buhl Investors / Saturday Properties selected in December 2016
Weekly meetings to refine concept & redevelopment strategy
Developer held several Open Houses and neighbor meetings to identify and address concerns
Used City’s typical development review process (Planning Commission, etc.)
Background 2016
11
The CITY of
EDINA
12
Community Vision
“Transportation Options - …
develop the sidewalk, trail
and bike networks to improve
accessibility and connectivity
...” (page 8)
Commercial Development… promote the
continued vitality of existing core retail
zones (page 9)
The CITY of
EDINA
•Economic development financing
tool
•Used throughout the U.S.
•Guided by Minnesota Statute
•Enabled by City Council
•Uses growth in tax base to fund
private investment and public
infrastructure
13
What is TIF?
Availability of Property Taxes to
Taxing Agencies
“Incremental Taxes”
Remain in TIF District
Original Taxes Available to All Ne
w
T
a
x
e
s
A
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
t
o
A
l
l
Year 1 Year 26
The CITY of
EDINA
14
What is TIF?
Source: State of MN House Research Department – Short Subject June 2014
•To finance public infrastructure (streets,
sewer, water, or parking facilities) that are
related to the development. In some cases, the
developer would be required to pay for this
infrastructure through special assessments or
other charges. In other cases, all taxpayers
would pay through general city taxes.
•To induce or cause a development or
redevelopment that otherwise would not occur –
e.g., to convince a developer to build an office
building, retail, industrial, or housing development
that otherwise would not be constructed. To do so,
the increased property taxes are used to pay for
costs (e.g., land acquisition or site preparation)
that the developer would normally pay.
Tax increment financing (TIF) uses the increased property taxes that a real estate development
generates to finance the costs of the development. In Minnesota, TIF is used for two basic purposes:
The CITY of
EDINA What is TIF?
15
•Boundaries
•Maximum Budget
•Term
•Qualifications
•But-for
1) Create
“District”
•Private developments
•Public improvements
2) Consider Funding
for Specific Projects
•4-year knock down
•5-year construction
•Annual reporting
•De-certification
3) Monitoring &
Compliance
Steps to Establish, Fund and Monitor TIF
(defined in Minnesota TIF Statutes)
Action recommended today
The CITY of
EDINA
Challenges to Redevelopment
1)- demolition costs
2)- environmental remediation
3)- proximity to neighbors
4)- affordable housing
5)- public realm costs
6)- structured parking costs
•Financing strategy to achieve
public goals without
overburdening property owners
•- return tax-exempt parcels to tax rolls
•- existing parking ramps funded 80%
TIF plus 20% assessment to
commercial property owners
•Proactive step to reposition
for continued success
•- lengthened life span of public parking
•- close, clean and safe underground
parking
•- new public plaza and pedestrian
routes
16
Why consider TIF?
The CITY of
EDINA
17
Why consider
TIF?
*Proposed 50th & France 2 TIF District
The CITY of
EDINA
$112,826
$1,635,539
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
1976 2009
50th and France 1 TIF
Growth in Tax Capacity
1976 to 2009
Edina’s First TIF Success Story
•50th & France (1) TIF District
•1974 to 2009
•1,350% growth in tax capacity
•Under-utilized parcels replaced with
•- Market-rate condominiums
•- Public parking structures
•- Public improvements
•- Edina’s highest commercial values
(per SF)
18
Why consider TIF?
1,350% increase
13+% approx. city-
wide increase
The CITY of
EDINA
A second example:
•Grandview (1) TIF District
•1984 to 2010
•832% growth in tax capacity
•Outdated industrial sites replaced with
•- Class A office building
•- Market-rate condominiums
•- Public park
•- Hennepin County Library
•- Edina Senior Center
19
Why consider TIF?
197,781
1,644,655
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
1984 2010
Grandview 1 TIF District
Growth in Net Tax Capacity
1984 - 2010
832% increase
13% approx. city-
wide increase
The CITY of
EDINA
•Avoid the “Include Everything”
approach
•Include only the parcels
imminently anticipated to change
•16% of 18.3-acre Commercial
Area
20
Proposed District
The CITY of
EDINA
Qualifying TIF Conditions
•9 parcels
•2.9 acres
•8 parcels tax-exempt
•All parcels evaluated per MN
Statute
•2 buildings deemed “sub-
standard”
•Vacant, parking & R-O-W parcels
•Buildings “reasonably distributed”
21
Proposed District
The CITY of
EDINA
Financial Estimates
•Redevelopment District - 26 year
term
•Original Tax Capacity = $72,509*
•Estimated Tax Capacity =
$1,558,128
•- Estimate only
•- Establishes maximum budget
•- No guarantee
* Currently $15,148; Estimate assumes that tax -
exempt parcels become taxable to benefit all taxing
districts
22
Proposed District
The CITY of
EDINA Financial Estimates
•Original Tax Capacity = $72,509*
•Est. Tax Capacity (completion) =
$744,171
•Est. Tax Capacity (year 26) = $1,558,128
23
Proposed District
Taxable Market Value – Estimate
Current Value = $12,760,300
New Value = $60,968,430
Difference = $48,108,130
* Estimated increase due to shift from tax-exempt to taxable
The CITY of
EDINA
Potential Revenue
Collected
•$28.5 million in taxes
•(over 26 year term)
•$31.4 million
•(with interest earnings)
24
Proposed Sources and Uses
Projected Uses of Funds
•Land acquisition $6.1 M
(19%)
•Site preparation $1.6 M (5%)
•Utilities $1.9 M (6%)
•Other Improvements $4.2 M
(13%)
•Administrative $2.9 M (9%)
•Interest $14.7 M
(47%)
•Total $31.4 M
Page 2-6 of TIF Plan
The CITY of
EDINA
Impacted Taxing Agencies
•City of Edina
•Edina School District #273
•Hennepin County
•Other smaller agencies too
•(Water shed, transit, HRA,
mosquito)
25
Comparison of Taxing
Agencies
Pages 2-5 and 2-9 of TIF Plan
Largest Taxing
Agencies
Total
Tax Capacity
OTC as % of
Total Tax
Capacity
Hennepin
County
1.573 billion 0.005 %
City of Edina 116.8 million 0.062 %
Edina School
District 273
97.0 million 0.074 %
Original Tax Capacity is estimated to increase from $15,148 to 72,509. This amount will always
be included in the general tax base. This is an immediate increase to all taxing districts.
MN TIF Statute requires that the OTC be recalculated if tax-exempt land becomes taxable.
The CITY of
EDINA
THEREFORE, It is the opinion of City staff and engaged consultants that it is
reasonable to conclude that significant private investment will not occur
without the use of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) to fund these extra-ordinary
cost.
•There are extensive costs to assemble land,
complete environmental remediation, site
preparation and construct mixed-use , public-private
improvements to benefit the community.
•While some re-use could occur without TIF, the
significant redevelopment anticipated is not likely to
exceed $35.8 million unless public participation is
available.
26
But-For Analysis per MN TIF Statute
From TIF Plan Appendix G, page 100
The CITY of
EDINA
29
Thank You.
City staff and Ehlers & Associates
are pleased to answer any other
questions.
North Ramp
262
Center Ramp
& Parking Lot
300
TOTAL = 562
North Ramp
573
Private Ramp
143
Center Ramp
128
North Ramp
337
(262 + 75)
Center Ramp
& Parking Lot
0
North Ramp
0
Center Ramp
& Parking Lot
300
TOTAL = 300* TOTAL = 337* TOTAL = 844
Public = 701**
Private = 143
Existing Conditions
2017 Jan to April 2018 Completion
Sept 2019 April to Oct. 2018
North Ramp
573
(262+75+132+104)
Center Ramp
& Parking Lot
0
Nov. 2018 to Sept 2019
*Additional parking stalls are likely to be temporarily available on
surface lots depending on the construction staging. Valet Parking
and/or Shuttle provided during time period where public parking
is not available (likely a few weeks in April/May 2018)
TOTAL = 573
** Upon Completion, there will be:
• 439 newly constructed parking stalls
• 139 more public stalls than existing
• 45 net surplus stalls
Edina Collaborative
Parking Overview rev 1
June 20, 2017
Step 1 Step 3 Step 2 Step 4
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI I I.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Bill Neuendorf, Ec o nomic Development Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:P ropos ed S ale of and R ed evelop ment Agreement fo r
3925, 3930 and 3944 Market S treet
Disc ussio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
N o action required; for discussion only.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
T his item pertains to the sale redevelopment of H R A-owned properties located on M arket S treet (formerly W.
49-1/2 S treet). T his potential transaction is based on the preferred response to the August 2016 R equest for
P roposals. Terms of a S ale and R edevelopment Agreement are presented for preliminary discussion. Action will
be deferred until after a P ublic H earing is conducted on J une 27, 2017.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Staff Report: Market St RDA
Redevelopment Agreement DRAFT 6-20-17
Summary - Sale and RDA
Sale & RDA Pres entation
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Economic Development / HRA
Phone 952-826-0407 • Fax 952-826-0390 • www.EdinaMN.gov
Date: June 20, 2017
To: Mayor and Council Members
cc:
From:
Bill Neuendorf
Economic Development Manager
Re: Potential Sale and Redevelopment Agreement – 3925, 3930 and 3944
Market Street (formerly W. 49-1/2 Street)
For the last six months, staff has been meeting with Buhl Investors/Saturday Properties to
negotiate the terms of a property sale and redevelopment agreement for parcels owned by the
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). Staff has been assisted by special legal
counsel (Dorsey and Whitney) and public finance advisors (Ehlers Associates) in these
negotiations. Buhl Investors/Saturday Properties is the Preferred Development Partner that was
selected after interviewing three different teams who had responded to a Request for Proposal
(RFP) that was issued for the site in summer 2016.
The fundamental redevelopment goals are to improve public parking conditions while enhancing
street life and adding vitality of the business district. This proposal achieves those goals by
replacing an aging and unfriendly 1970’s-era parking structure with below-grade parking and an
expanded North Ramp that includes new commercial space on the street level. The proposal also
adds round-the-clock vitality by including 110 new apartment units and new commercial space
centered upon a new public plaza.
The Edina Planning Commission recommended approval of the project on April 5, 2017. The
project concept secured preliminary zoning approvals from the City Council on April 18, 2017 and
final approvals are anticipated to be granted on June 20, 2017. These land use approvals are
Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Established 1974
Potential Sale and Redevelopment Agreement – 3925, 3930 and 3944 Market Street
June 20, 2017
Page 2
contingent upon execution of a Sale and Redevelopment Agreement mutually agreeable to
Market Street LLC and the Edina HRA.
After working collaboratively with the developer and their team of consultants, staff has reached
tentative agreement on the terms of the real estate transaction and Redevelopment Agreement.
These documents achieve a project that delivers each of the nine qualities on which the original
Request for Proposal measured success:
Measures of Success
(page 8 of RFP)
Summary
1) Compliance with height
restriction and minimized
impact to residential properties
north of the (3930 Market
Street) site
Yes – the 4-story height limit is maintained along the northerly
edge of the business district; additional height is limited to the
interior block where it has negligible impact to single-family
houses behind the North Parking Ramp
2) Assembly of adjacent or
nearby parcels
Yes, this proposal includes 8 parcels in addition to the
vacant parcel at 3930 Market St.
3) Anticipated growth in
taxable value
Yes, the project will return 7 parcels that are vacant or tax
exempt to the property tax rolls; there will be a
tremendous increase in the tax capacity of the
redeveloped parcels.
4) Creation of new public
parking
Yes, the aging Center Ramp will be replaced with new
underground parking in the same location and an
expansion of the North Ramp. A total of 439 new public
parking spaces will be constructed, increasing the existing
public parking by 129 stalls.
5) Creation of new
commercial space
Yes, approximately 35,000 Sq. Ft. of new Class A
commercial street will be constructed to bring new
opportunity to Market Street
6) Creation of new market
rate housing units
Yes, 110 new apartment units will be constructed to bring
new residents to the area; 10% of the units will be
affordably-priced
7) Creation of public plaza
or similar public areas
Yes, the proposal creates a new 5,900 Sq. Ft. public plaza
and a total of 34,000 Sq Ft of pedestrian circulation area
8) Reduction of existing curb
cuts and vehicle-pedestrian
Yes, this proposal eliminates one of the existing curb cuts
and channels pedestrians crossing the street to
Potential Sale and Redevelopment Agreement – 3925, 3930 and 3944 Market Street
June 20, 2017
Page 3
Measures of Success
(page 8 of RFP)
Summary
conflict points designated routes
9) Capacity of team to
complete project
Yes, the developers bring development and management
experience and financial capital; their in-house strength is
supplemented by a team of professionals with expertise in
their field and local knowledge of Edina and 50th and France
The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority has reviewed the progress of the negotiations
regularly and met in closed session to discuss the final terms of the proposed real estate
transaction. The complete Redevelopment Agreement and a summary of the key terms are
attached. While the property is currently owned by the Edina HRA, this information is provided to
both the Edina HRA and the Edina City Council for discussion purposes. If approved, both the City
and the HRA will be party to various aspects of the Redevelopment Agreement.
Based on compliance with the goals of the RFP and input from community, staff believes the
redevelopment strategy will result in new public amenities and new commercial space that will
help 50th and France retain its place as a desirable and successful destination for Edina residents
as well as guests from throughout the Twin Cities.
No action is requested today. Instead, a special meeting with a Public Hearing has been
scheduled for Tuesday June 27, 2017 at 7:00 PM at Edina City Hall. Notices of this Special Meeting
have been posted, published and mailed to nearby property owners. Action on the attached
documents is anticipated to be taken after the Public Hearing and further consideration on June
27th.
Staff and representatives from Ehlers Associates and Dorsey & Whitney, the HRA’s advisors and
counsel, will be available to present the key terms of the Agreement and answer related
questions.
END
The CITY of
EDINA
Proposed Sale and Redevelopment Agreement
Edina Collaborative
3925, 3930-3944 Market (formerly W. 49-1/2) Street
1) Project Description
2) Conditions of Sale
3) HRA Loan and TIF
4) Terms & Conditions
Edina City Council
Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority
June 20, 2017
www.EdinaMN.gov
The CITY of
EDINA
2
Project Description - History
2012 Parking improvements considered but abandoned due to high cost and low return
2013 Edina HRA acquired two parcels for future parking improvements
2014
Parking-only option set aside; preference to mixed-use option that creates street
vitality and encourage patrons to visit more than one business
General repairs and improvements made to all public infrastructure; funded via
Cent. Lakes TIF monies and Special Assessments to 50/France property owners
2016
C. Marohn visits and inquires whether todays customers consider the aging,
lifeless ramps helpful or hurtful to the appeal of 50th & France
Edina HRA issues Request for Proposal to seek creative approaches to
public/private redevelopment on W. 49-1/2 Street
Three developers interviewed; Buhl/Saturday team selected as preferred partner
The CITY of
EDINA
3
Project Description
Public Private Partnership
Market
Street, LLC
City of Edina
and
Edina H.R.A.
The CITY of
EDINA
4
Project Description
Public-Private Partnership consists of
two distinct and symbiotic elements.
When working together, these
projects:
Increase and improve public parking
conditions,
Create new public realm amenities
Add vitality on W. 49-1/2 Street,
Return properties to tax rolls,
Create new living options and new
business opportunities
#1 Expansion of North Parking Ramp
Add 4th parking level
Add parking on adjacent vacant lots
Add 10,000 Sq. Ft. commercial
$10.7 M cost estimate
#2 Construction of Mixed-Use Structure
Demolish existing structure
Add 25,000 Sq. Ft. commercial
Add 110 apartments
New public & private underground parking
Reconstruct shared public plaza and walkways
$74.3 M cost estimate
The CITY of
EDINA
5
Project Description
Before after
The CITY of
EDINA
6
Project Description
The CITY of
EDINA
7
Project Description - Location
All parcels tax-exempt or vacant
The CITY of
EDINA
8
Project Description
Conditions of Sale
•Real estate transaction AND redevelopment – not a simple property
sale
•Closing in two stages
•- Initial transfer of funds before HRA begins North Ramp Expansion
($5.1 M)
•- Second transfer when commercial shell complete ($1 M)
•3944 parcel razed prior to construction (HRA expense)
•Other HRA contributions AFTER building is completed, occupiable
and actual costs verified
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description –
North Ramp Expansion
www.EdinaMN.gov 10
•1.33 acres
•3 parcels – tax exempt
•1 parcel – vacant
•Formerly occupied by
Class C office and retail
space
•262 existing stalls
2018 Schedule
January to
March
Construction begins; temporary
closure to allow 4th level
construction
April to
September
Expansion on 3930 and 3944
parcels; commercial grey box;
finishes and landscaping
Fall North Ramp complete*
* Occupancy of commercial tenant spaces depends
on leasing
The CITY of
EDINA
North Ramp Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 11
3944
Retail
3944 expansion 3930 expansion
3930
Retail
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description
Budget – North Ramp Expansion
12
Description Amount Pct.
Environmental remediation $ 149,285 1%
Parking expansion $ 8,012,014 75%
Retail shell construction (paid by developer) $ 621,120 6%
Sidewalks, landscaping, screening $ 345,840 3%
Architecture/engineering $ 562,600 5%
Construction Management $ 384,348 3.5%
Other soft costs $ 115,959 1%
Contingency $ 501,837 5%
Total Estimated Costs $ 10,700,207
Approx $34,000
per stall
(excluding real
estate &
demolition)
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description –
North Ramp Expansion
www.EdinaMN.gov 13
•Expanded from 262 to 573
public stalls
•Creation of approx. 10,000
Sq. Ft. Class A commercial
space
•Commercial space sold to
Developer for $1 M
•$10.7 Million cost estimate
(design and construction)
Revenue Sources
$6,100,000 Land Sales
$621,120 Developer contribution
$3,808,114 Cent. Lakes TIF monies
(CIP 15-224)
$170,973 Enviro. grant (pending)
$10,700,207 TOTAL
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description –
South Side Reconstruction
www.EdinaMN.gov 14
•1.53 acres
•5 parcels
•Tax-exempt since
1977
•310 existing stalls to
be relocated
2018-2019 Schedule
Jan. 2018 Real estate transaction
March –April
2018
Demolition and sitework begins after
North Ramp 4th level expansion
substantially complete
Summer 2018 Below grade and commercial street
level constructed
Fall 2018 –
Summer 2019
Above-grade construction
Early Fall 2019 Apartments & public spaces complete
* Occupancy of commercial tenant spaces depends on leasing
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 15
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 16
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 17
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 18
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 19
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description
Budget – South Site Redevelopment
20
Description Amount Pct.
Acquisition and Site Costs $ 9,200,859 12.4%
Construction Costs $ 51,404,068 69.2%
Permits & Fees $ 796,509 10.7%
Professional Services $ 3,860,683 5.2%
Financing Costs $ 5,140,282 6.9%
Project Management $ 2,841,888 3.8%
Operations & Marketing $ 1,024,038 1.4%
Total $74,268,328
Construction Costs
Parking levels $8.4 M
Outdoor plaza $1.8 M
Site prep/demo $2.5 M
$12.7 M
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description –
South Site Reconstruction
www.EdinaMN.gov 21
•Land sold for $5.1 million
•Creation of approx. 25,000 Sq. Ft.
Class A commercial space
•Creation of 110 apartments, 11 of
which are affordably-priced
•Creation of underground public
parking and underground private
parking
•Creation of public plaza and public
walkways
•$74.3 Million cost estimate (design
and construction)
Revenue Sources
$18,543,755 Equity (includes $700k
deferred developer fee)
$41,900,000 Primary Financing (Debt)
$2,324,573 Grants (pending)
$700,000 HRA Affordable Housing
Loan
$10,100,00 TIF Note
$74,268,328 TOTAL
The CITY of
EDINA
•City policy requires housing that is
“affordably” priced
•- Developer will commit to 10% of
the units targeted to households
earning no more than 60% of AMI
•- $1.4 to $1.9 Million lost revenue
(depending on unit size)
•- Unable to reach agreeable
finance terms with Edina Housing
Foundation
22
HRA Affordable Housing Loan
Key question to consider:
Without increasing the density or
eliminating other public elements, how
will the affordable units be financed?
gap
The CITY of
EDINA
Recommended Solution
•$700,000 loan from existing HRA monies to
fund lost earnings on 5% of units
•- Issued after affordable units completed
•- 15-year term loan
•Interest only with lump sum at term
•1% annual interest plus “true-up” at term to
match inflation (2.5% max, annually)
•Developer defers fee for 10-years to pay for
remaining 5% units
•- 10-year term of affordability
23
HRA Affordable Housing Loan
Option to consider:
HRA could contribute more $ if
it is desired to keep units
affordable for more than 10
years
gap
The CITY of
EDINA
HRA sale and City zoning approvals
contingent on creation of new public
parking, new public plaza and new public
walkways
•TIF-eligible expenses estimated to be
$12.7 million
•Creates a financing gap that cannot be
funded with traditional debt
•Developer’s equity contribution is higher
than typical projects
•Grant funds sought to reduce gap
•Developers’ anticipated return is lower
than typical projects 24
Incremental Taxes (TIF)
Key conclusion:
“But for” the use of TIF to bridge
the remaining gap, the project
will not move forward
gap
The CITY of
EDINA
Recommended Solution
•$10.1 Million pay-as-you-go TIF Note
•Note issued at closing
•Payments begin approx. 6 months after
verification of actual expenses and project
completion
•- Based on 90% of increment
•26-year repayment
•Note bears 6% interest after completion
•Could be repaid early, if taxes generated
exceed estimate
25
Incremental Taxes (TIF)
gap
Key conclusion:
“But for” the use of TIF to bridge
the remaining gap, the project
will not move forward
The CITY of
EDINA
•Retain affordability of units for
10-15 years
•Provide permanent easement
for public plaza, public
walkways, shared trash rooms
and underground public
parking
•Manage underground public
parking
Responsibilities
Terms & Conditions
26
Responsibilities of Developer
•Bear financial risk of design,
acquisition and construction
•Bear City costs related to TIF
creation & RDA negotiation
•Coordinate construction of
North Ramp expansion and
Mixed-Use
The CITY of
EDINA
Commitments of City / HRA
•Enable TIF public finance tool
•Consent to grant applications
•Transfer ownership of land
•Expand North Parking Ramp
•Provide gap financing for mixed-
use development and affordably-
priced units
Responsibilities
Terms & Conditions
27
•Reimburse for maintenance of
underground public parking and
shared trash rooms
•- expenses distributed via annual
District maintenance
assessments
•Maintain public plaza and
walkways
•- expenses distributed via annual
District maintenance
assessments
The CITY of
EDINA
•Developer to manage and schedule
regular maintenance
•City to determine rates, hours of
operation and public use policy
•City to reimburse Developer for regular
maintenance expenses
•- these expenses to be included in
annual assessments to 50th and France
property owners
Underground Public Parking Easement
Terms & Conditions
28
Responsibilities of Developer
•Construct a two-level underground
parking facility
•Provide a permanent public
easement to allow public parking on
the first underground level
•Approx 128 stalls with stairway and
elevator access to street level
•Developer to retain ownership of
structure
The CITY of
EDINA
•Developer to retain ownership of
below-grade structure
•City to determine hours of operation
and public use policy
•City to manage and schedule regular
maintenance
•- these expenses to be included in
annual assessments to 50th and
France property owners
Public Plaza & Walkway Easement
Terms & Conditions
29
Responsibilities of Developer
•Construct outdoor plaza with seating,
landscaping, water feature and fire pit
•Provide a permanent public easement
to allow public use of this outdoor
space
•Approx. 4,900 Sq. Ft. of plaza and
7,400 Sq. Ft. of shared street/woonerf
•Total pedestrian circulation area is
approx. 34,000 Sq. Ft.
The CITY of
EDINA
•Developer to manage and schedule
regular maintenance
•City to determine public use policy
•City to reimburse Developer for disposal
and hauling fees as well as regular
maintenance expenses
•- these expenses to be included in
annual assessments to 50th and France
property owners
Shared Trash Rooms Easement
Terms & Conditions
30
Responsibilities of Developer
•Construct waste collection rooms for
the shared use of merchants located
on this entire city block
•Provide a permanent public
easement to allow shared use of the
trash rooms
•Developer to retain ownership of
structure
The CITY of
EDINA
•Valet parking service provided at
Developer expense
•- approx. 3 weeks when public parking
is minimal (April/May 2018)
•- three temporary valet locations
anticipated
•- off-site vehicle parking at nearby off-
street parking lots
•- hours and days based on business
input and demand
Interim Public Parking Solutions
Terms & Conditions
31
Responsibilities of Developer
•Most invasive construction work
scheduled during period with lowest
parking demand (Jan through April)
•Construction staggered to reduce or
eliminate parking impact during
highest parking demand (Nov-Dec)
•Contractors and subcontractors
required to park off-site
•Material staging and storage areas
located off-site
The CITY of
EDINA
Risks, Precautions and Remedies
Terms & Conditions
32
Remedies in case of default
•Unable to secure financing – HRA
retains land and delays project
•Unable to complete apartments – No
TIF payments required; No loan
awarded; potential reversion (subject
to mortgage provisions)
•Unable to purchase north
commercial boxes, or unable to
begin south site - HRA retains space
and retains $600k to construct shell
Precautions to minimize City’s
Risk
•Go ahead letter required before
bids awarded
•Most land proceeds secured up
front
•TIF Lookback provisions
•Loan issued after completion
•TIF payments after completion
The CITY of
EDINA Summary & Recommendation
33
City staff, legal counsel and financial advisors
have reviewed the financing plans of the
developer and drafted the Redevelopment
Agreement. It is recommended that the
Redevelopment Agreement be approved and
staff be authorized to implement the terms.
The CITY of
EDINA
34
Thank You.
City staff, and advisors from Dorsey,
and Ehlers are available to answer
questions.
The CITY of
EDINA
Proposed Sale and Redevelopment Agreement
Edina Collaborative
3925, 3930-3944 Market (formerly W. 49-1/2) Street
1) Project Description
2) Conditions of Sale
3) HRA Loan and TIF
4) Terms & Conditions
Edina City Council
Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority
June 20, 2017
www.EdinaMN.gov
The CITY of
EDINA
2
Project Description - History
2012 Parking improvements considered but abandoned due to high cost and low return
2013 Edina HRA acquired two parcels for future parking improvements
2014
Parking-only option set aside; preference to mixed-use option that creates street
vitality and encourage patrons to visit more than one business
General repairs and improvements made to all public infrastructure; funded via
Cent. Lakes TIF monies and Special Assessments to 50/France property owners
2016
C. Marohn visits and inquires whether todays customers consider the aging,
lifeless ramps helpful or hurtful to the appeal of 50th & France
Edina HRA issues Request for Proposal to seek creative approaches to
public/private redevelopment on W. 49-1/2 Street
Three developers interviewed; Buhl/Saturday team selected as preferred partner
The CITY of
EDINA
3
Project Description
Public Private Partnership
Market
Street, LLC
City of Edina
and
Edina H.R.A.
The CITY of
EDINA
4
Project Description
Public-Private Partnership consists of
two distinct and symbiotic elements.
When working together, these
projects:
Increase and improve public parking
conditions,
Create new public realm amenities
Add vitality on W. 49-1/2 Street,
Return properties to tax rolls,
Create new living options and new
business opportunities
#1 Expansion of North Parking Ramp
Add 4th parking level
Add parking on adjacent vacant lots
Add 10,000 Sq. Ft. commercial
$10.7 M cost estimate
#2 Construction of Mixed-Use Structure
Demolish existing structure
Add 25,000 Sq. Ft. commercial
Add 110 apartments
New public & private underground parking
Reconstruct shared public plaza and walkways
$74.3 M cost estimate
The CITY of
EDINA
5
Project Description
Before after
The CITY of
EDINA
6
Project Description
The CITY of
EDINA
7
Project Description - Location
All parcels tax-exempt or vacant
The CITY of
EDINA
8
Project Description
Conditions of Sale
•Real estate transaction AND redevelopment – not a simple property
sale
•Closing in two stages
•- Initial transfer of funds before HRA begins North Ramp Expansion
($5.1 M)
•- Second transfer when commercial shell complete ($1 M)
•3944 parcel razed prior to construction (HRA expense)
•Other HRA contributions AFTER building is completed, occupiable
and actual costs verified
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description –
North Ramp Expansion
www.EdinaMN.gov 10
•1.33 acres
•3 parcels – tax exempt
•1 parcel – vacant
•Formerly occupied by
Class C office and retail
space
•262 existing stalls
2018 Schedule
January to
March
Construction begins; temporary
closure to allow 4th level
construction
April to
September
Expansion on 3930 and 3944
parcels; commercial grey box;
finishes and landscaping
Fall North Ramp complete*
* Occupancy of commercial tenant spaces depends
on leasing
The CITY of
EDINA
North Ramp Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 11
3944
Retail
3944 expansion 3930 expansion
3930
Retail
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description
Budget – North Ramp Expansion
12
Description Amount Pct.
Environmental remediation $ 149,285 1%
Parking expansion $ 8,012,014 75%
Retail shell construction (paid by developer) $ 621,120 6%
Sidewalks, landscaping, screening $ 345,840 3%
Architecture/engineering $ 562,600 5%
Construction Management $ 384,348 3.5%
Other soft costs $ 115,959 1%
Contingency $ 501,837 5%
Total Estimated Costs $ 10,700,207
Approx $34,000
per stall
(excluding real
estate &
demolition)
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description –
North Ramp Expansion
www.EdinaMN.gov 13
•Expanded from 262 to 573
public stalls
•Creation of approx. 10,000
Sq. Ft. Class A commercial
space
•Commercial space sold to
Developer for $1 M
•$10.7 Million cost estimate
(design and construction)
Revenue Sources
$6,100,000 Land Sales
$621,120 Developer contribution
$3,808,114 Cent. Lakes TIF monies
(CIP 15-224)
$170,973 Enviro. grant (pending)
$10,700,207 TOTAL
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description –
South Side Reconstruction
www.EdinaMN.gov 14
•1.53 acres
•5 parcels
•Tax-exempt since
1977
•310 existing stalls to
be relocated
2018-2019 Schedule
Jan. 2018 Real estate transaction
March –April
2018
Demolition and sitework begins after
North Ramp 4th level expansion
substantially complete
Summer 2018 Below grade and commercial street
level constructed
Fall 2018 –
Summer 2019
Above-grade construction
Early Fall 2019 Apartments & public spaces complete
* Occupancy of commercial tenant spaces depends on leasing
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 15
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 16
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 17
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 18
The CITY of
EDINA
Mixed-Use Renderings
Project Description
www.EdinaMN.gov 19
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description
Budget – South Site Redevelopment
20
Description Amount Pct.
Acquisition and Site Costs $ 9,200,859 12.4%
Construction Costs $ 51,404,068 69.2%
Permits & Fees $ 796,509 10.7%
Professional Services $ 3,860,683 5.2%
Financing Costs $ 5,140,282 6.9%
Project Management $ 2,841,888 3.8%
Operations & Marketing $ 1,024,038 1.4%
Total $74,268,328
Construction Costs
Parking levels $8.4 M
Outdoor plaza $1.8 M
Site prep/demo $2.5 M
$12.7 M
The CITY of
EDINA Project Description –
South Site Reconstruction
www.EdinaMN.gov 21
•Land sold for $5.1 million
•Creation of approx. 25,000 Sq. Ft.
Class A commercial space
•Creation of 110 apartments, 11 of
which are affordably-priced
•Creation of underground public
parking and underground private
parking
•Creation of public plaza and public
walkways
•$74.3 Million cost estimate (design
and construction)
Revenue Sources
$18,543,755 Equity (includes $700k
deferred developer fee)
$41,900,000 Primary Financing (Debt)
$2,324,573 Grants (pending)
$700,000 HRA Affordable Housing
Loan
$10,100,00 TIF Note
$74,268,328 TOTAL
The CITY of
EDINA
•City policy requires housing that is
“affordably” priced
•- Developer will commit to 10% of
the units targeted to households
earning no more than 60% of AMI
•- $1.4 to $1.9 Million lost revenue
(depending on unit size)
•- Unable to reach agreeable
finance terms with Edina Housing
Foundation
22
HRA Affordable Housing Loan
Key question to consider:
Without increasing the density or
eliminating other public elements, how
will the affordable units be financed?
gap
The CITY of
EDINA
Recommended Solution
•$700,000 loan from existing HRA monies to
fund lost earnings on 5% of units
•- Issued after affordable units completed
•- 15-year term loan
•Interest only with lump sum at term
•1% annual interest plus “true-up” at term to
match inflation (2.5% max, annually)
•Developer defers fee for 10-years to pay for
remaining 5% units
•- 10-year term of affordability
23
HRA Affordable Housing Loan
Option to consider:
HRA could contribute more $ if
it is desired to keep units
affordable for more than 10
years
gap
The CITY of
EDINA
HRA sale and City zoning approvals
contingent on creation of new public
parking, new public plaza and new public
walkways
•TIF-eligible expenses estimated to be
$12.7 million
•Creates a financing gap that cannot be
funded with traditional debt
•Developer’s equity contribution is higher
than typical projects
•Grant funds sought to reduce gap
•Developers’ anticipated return is lower
than typical projects 24
Incremental Taxes (TIF)
Key conclusion:
“But for” the use of TIF to bridge
the remaining gap, the project
will not move forward
gap
The CITY of
EDINA
Recommended Solution
•$10.1 Million pay-as-you-go TIF Note
•Note issued at closing
•Payments begin approx. 6 months after
verification of actual expenses and project
completion
•- Based on 90% of increment
•26-year repayment
•Note bears 6% interest after completion
•Could be repaid early, if taxes generated
exceed estimate
25
Incremental Taxes (TIF)
gap
Key conclusion:
“But for” the use of TIF to bridge
the remaining gap, the project
will not move forward
The CITY of
EDINA
•Retain affordability of units for
10-15 years
•Provide permanent easement
for public plaza, public
walkways, shared trash rooms
and underground public
parking
•Manage underground public
parking
Responsibilities
Terms & Conditions
26
Responsibilities of Developer
•Bear financial risk of design,
acquisition and construction
•Bear City costs related to TIF
creation & RDA negotiation
•Coordinate construction of
North Ramp expansion and
Mixed-Use
The CITY of
EDINA
Commitments of City / HRA
•Enable TIF public finance tool
•Consent to grant applications
•Transfer ownership of land
•Expand North Parking Ramp
•Provide gap financing for mixed-
use development and affordably-
priced units
Responsibilities
Terms & Conditions
27
•Reimburse for maintenance of
underground public parking and
shared trash rooms
•- expenses distributed via annual
District maintenance
assessments
•Maintain public plaza and
walkways
•- expenses distributed via annual
District maintenance
assessments
The CITY of
EDINA
•Developer to manage and schedule
regular maintenance
•City to determine rates, hours of
operation and public use policy
•City to reimburse Developer for regular
maintenance expenses
•- these expenses to be included in
annual assessments to 50th and France
property owners
Underground Public Parking Easement
Terms & Conditions
28
Responsibilities of Developer
•Construct a two-level underground
parking facility
•Provide a permanent public
easement to allow public parking on
the first underground level
•Approx 128 stalls with stairway and
elevator access to street level
•Developer to retain ownership of
structure
The CITY of
EDINA
•Developer to retain ownership of
below-grade structure
•City to determine hours of operation
and public use policy
•City to manage and schedule regular
maintenance
•- these expenses to be included in
annual assessments to 50th and
France property owners
Public Plaza & Walkway Easement
Terms & Conditions
29
Responsibilities of Developer
•Construct outdoor plaza with seating,
landscaping, water feature and fire pit
•Provide a permanent public easement
to allow public use of this outdoor
space
•Approx. 4,900 Sq. Ft. of plaza and
7,400 Sq. Ft. of shared street/woonerf
•Total pedestrian circulation area is
approx. 34,000 Sq. Ft.
The CITY of
EDINA
•Developer to manage and schedule
regular maintenance
•City to determine public use policy
•City to reimburse Developer for disposal
and hauling fees as well as regular
maintenance expenses
•- these expenses to be included in
annual assessments to 50th and France
property owners
Shared Trash Rooms Easement
Terms & Conditions
30
Responsibilities of Developer
•Construct waste collection rooms for
the shared use of merchants located
on this entire city block
•Provide a permanent public
easement to allow shared use of the
trash rooms
•Developer to retain ownership of
structure
The CITY of
EDINA
•Valet parking service provided at
Developer expense
•- approx. 3 weeks when public parking
is minimal (April/May 2018)
•- three temporary valet locations
anticipated
•- off-site vehicle parking at nearby off-
street parking lots
•- hours and days based on business
input and demand
Interim Public Parking Solutions
Terms & Conditions
31
Responsibilities of Developer
•Most invasive construction work
scheduled during period with lowest
parking demand (Jan through April)
•Construction staggered to reduce or
eliminate parking impact during
highest parking demand (Nov-Dec)
•Contractors and subcontractors
required to park off-site
•Material staging and storage areas
located off-site
The CITY of
EDINA
Risks, Precautions and Remedies
Terms & Conditions
32
Remedies in case of default
•Unable to secure financing – HRA
retains land and delays project
•Unable to complete apartments – No
TIF payments required; No loan
awarded; potential reversion (subject
to mortgage provisions)
•Unable to purchase north
commercial boxes, or unable to
begin south site - HRA retains space
and retains $600k to construct shell
Precautions to minimize City’s
Risk
•Go ahead letter required before
bids awarded
•Most land proceeds secured up
front
•TIF Lookback provisions
•Loan issued after completion
•TIF payments after completion
The CITY of
EDINA Summary & Recommendation
33
City staff, legal counsel and financial advisors
have reviewed the financing plans of the
developer and drafted the Redevelopment
Agreement. It is recommended that the
Redevelopment Agreement be approved and
staff be authorized to implement the terms.
The CITY of
EDINA
34
Thank You.
City staff, and advisors from Dorsey,
and Ehlers are available to answer
questions.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI I I.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Bill Neuendorf, Ec o nomic Development Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:R es olution 2017-64: Identifying the Need fo r Livab le
C ommunities Demons tratio n Ac c o unt F und ing and
Autho rizing Ap p licatio ns fo r G rant F und s
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
Approve R esolution 2017-64.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
T he M etropolitan C ouncil offers grants to projects that achieve local and regional development goals. Staff and
developers have met with M et. C ouncil staff and agreed to submit two projects for consideration in 2017 - T he
Avenue on F rance and the C ollaborative on M arket S treet. B oth projects satisfy goals of the funding program
and should compete well. W hile both projects are fully supported, the Collaborative is considered the first priority
due to its readiness, affordable units and public benefits.
T he attached resolution authorizes these two grant applications and is recommended to be approved prior to the
June 29, 2017 application deadline.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Res 2017-64 LCDA grant applications
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-64
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION
ACCOUNT FUNDING AND
AUTHORIZING APPLICATIONS FOR GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS the City of Edina is a participant in the Livable Communities Act’s Housing Incentives
Program for 2017 as determined by the Metropolitan Council and is therefore eligible to apply
for Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds; and
WHEREAS the City has identified proposed projects within the City that meet the Demonstration
Account’s purposes and criteria and are consistent with and promote the purposes of the
Metropolitan Livable Communities Act and the policies of the Metropolitan Council’s adopted
metropolitan development guide; and
WHEREAS the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate
project administration; and
WHEREAS the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated
in the grant agreement; and
WHEREAS the City agrees to act as legal sponsor for the projects contained in the grant
applications submitted on June 29, 2017;
WHEREAS the City acknowledges Livable Communities Demonstration Account grants are
intended to fund projects or project components that can serve as models, examples or
prototypes for development or redevelopment projects elsewhere in the region, and therefore
represents that the proposed projects or key components of the proposed projects can be
replicated in other metropolitan-area communities; and
WHEREAS only a limited amount of grant funding is available through the Metropolitan
Council’s Livable Communities Demonstration Account during each funding cycle and the
Metropolitan Council has determined it is appropriate to allocate those scarce grant funds only
to eligible projects that would not occur without the availability of Demonstration Account grant
funding; and
WHEREAS cities may submit grant applications for up to three projects during each funding
cycle for LCDA Development Grants and Pre-Development Grants combined, but, using the
cities’ own internal ranking processes, must rank their projects by priority so the Metropolitan
Council may consider those priority rankings as it reviews applications and makes grant awards.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and consideration, the
governing body of the City:
1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City’s development goals and priorities for the
proposed projects to occur at these particular sites at this particular time.
2. Finds that the project components for which Livable Communities Demonstration
Account funding is sought:
• will not occur solely through private or other public investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future; and
• will occur within the term of the grant award only if Livable Communities
Demonstration Account funding is made available for these projects at this time.
3. Ranks the project funding applications, according to the City’s own internal priorities, in
the following order:
Priority Project Name Grant Amount Requested
1. The Collaborative $ 1,441,565
2. The Avenue on France (Phase 1) $ 1,300,000
4. Represents that the City has undertaken reasonable and good faith efforts to procure
funding for the project component for which Livable Communities Demonstration
Account funding is sought but was not able to find or secure from other sources funding
that is necessary for project component commencement within the term of the grant
award and states that this representation is based on the following reasons and
supporting facts:
• The pro forma of the Edina Collaborative maximizes private funding sources and
minimizes return to the developer while still keeping the project in the range of
feasibility. While the City is considering the use of incremental taxes, there are not
sufficient taxes generated to support full construction, finishing and landscaping of
the public plaza and woonerf . Outside funding is necessary to deliver the public
realm elements desired by the developer and City.
• The pro forma of The Avenue on France project also maximizes private funding
sources. This site does not qualify for Tax Increment Financing. An outside funding
source is necessary to deliver the public realm amenities desired by the developer
and City.
5. Authorizes its City Manager or designee to submit on behalf of the City applications for
Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds for the
project components identified in the applications, and to execute such agreements as
may be necessary to implement the projects on behalf of the City.
Adopted by the Edina City Council this _____ day of June, 2017.
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by
the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June _____, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of________________________, 2017.
_______________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: VI I I.C .
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk
Item Activity:
Subject:R es olution No. 2017-65: Approving G rants and
Donations
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
M otion to adopt R esolution.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
I n order to comply with S tate S tatutes, all donations to the C ity must be adopted by a resolution approved by
four favorable votes of the C ouncil accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the
various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Res olution No. 2016-65 Donations
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-65
ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real
or personal property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a
two thirds majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere
appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens.
Parks & Recreation - Braemar Arena
Tom Collins Sculpture – Lucy Figure Skating Displayed at Braemar Arena
Dated: June 20, 2017
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify
that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of June 20, 2017, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________.
City Clerk
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: I X.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
R ep o rt / R ecommend atio n
F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk
Item Activity:
Subject:R ec eive P etitio n O pposing Athletic F ields At F red
R ic hards P ark
Ac tio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
M otion to receive the petition presented to the C ity by S teve C urry and take it under advisement.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
O n June 14, 2017 M r. S teve C urry presented the attached petition to city staff. I n this case it is an advisory
petition and does not require processing for feasibility.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Petition Received June 14, 2017 Fred Richards Park
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: I X.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
Advis o ry C o mmunication
F rom:S ulekha Mo hamed, Executive As s is tant
Item Activity:
Subject:C orres pond enc e
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
N one.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
Attached is the correspondence received since the last C ity C ouncil meeting
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
2017-06-20.1 Corres pondence
Email for Council Members received on 06-20-17
2017-06-20.2 Corres pondence
Thank you note for Council Members
Letter to City of Edina: Propos ed 50th & France 2 TIF Modification
From:Jfisher17
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Arden Park Restoration
Date:Tuesday, June 06, 2017 4:07:03 PM
Mayor Hovland: As a resident of 5232 Brookview Ave. for the past 32 years, I urge you reconsider this restoration
plan as it has been presented. Across the street from me and along the creek, many trees, as I understand, will have
to be cut down for the viewing areas and for the path. There is no need to cut down trees, and no need for a path.
People have gotten along just fine without those for many years. If people want to "view the park", let them go
down to the park to view it. On top of that, where would they park except probably in front of many of our
driveways? I myself would much rather look at trees than the park-that's why the location of this house interested
me in the first place. Plus, aren't we supposed to be for wildlife? Why disturb an area that's teeming with the views
of nature. There's a bald eagle pair that visits the area regularly. I've seen fox, coyotes, raccoons, owls, and hawks. I
can understand getting rid of the buckthorn, but please leave the trees and don't disturb the area with a path that is
totally unnecessary. Thanks, Jim Fisher 5232 Brookview Ave. So.
Sent from my iPad
From:Tom Jones
To:stan davis
Cc:jim@jimgrotz.com; Edina Mail; janis.callison@hennepin.us; JWisker@minnehahacreek.org
Subject:Re: Arden Park attention city council and mayor and Commissioner Jan Callison, Chair of the Hennepin County
Board of Commissioners.
Date:Tuesday, June 06, 2017 8:59:36 PM
Amen. To elaborate, I have contacted several contractors with experience and expertise
regarding code and OSHA concerns on the West Bank, and the floodway. The consensus thus
far, is that the proposal is at least 2 million under actual likely cost, presents significant
liability issues, and have had parties in the legal community suggest that the gross negligence
may subject not only the governing bodies and agencies to liability, but in the case of no
evidence of reasonable care and due diligence, subject the negligent individuals to liability, to
include monetary, punitive, and criminal damages. I have personally participated in over a
dozen developments, as a contractor, partner, architectural firm owner, feasibility consultant,
and marketing consultant, and for approaching 40 years. I have never seen anything lacking
accountability to this degree. There are dozens, if not hundreds of people prepared to make
sure appropriate light is shed on this, and the responsibility of the concerned parties at the city
and the watershed.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:51 PM, stan davis <edinacreekside@yahoo.com> wrote:
to the city council and the mayor and Ms. Callison, Jay Wisker,
Tom has stated some real concerns about this project from both the
economic and the ecologic sides of this poorly thought out proposal. I
would go so far as to say that whomever concocted this plan, and the
primary drivers of it from the MCWD should be fired. I am starting an
email campaign with this email to give the Chair of the Hennepin County
Board some appreciation for the concerns of her constituents. Since she
is ultimately responsible, along with the board, as to who sits on the board
of MCWD, it makes since that she would be concerned. perhaps i'm
wrong.
Only 2 and a half years ago, Mike Osterholm, a well know infectious
disease expert who travels the world to conferences and has had many
meetings with various federal and local agencies, stated about the
MCWD,
I've never seen any organization in Minnesota in my 40 years with
more dysfunction and lack of good governance." Star Tribune,
10/14/2014
At the time he was serving as one among a citizens advisory board. This
would beg for more oversight at the time of the quote and for the last 2
and a half years, but i don't see it. That lack of oversight and the current
bullying of the MCWD can only come down to one body's
accountability...the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners.
This MCWD proposal has been disingenuous from the start and
"disingenuous" has become my operative word for this whole process. I
will give more information about this during my 3 minutes tonight at City
Hall, if they have me. It won't be all of the information i have but will be
damning of the MCWD and the Edina Park and Rec Boards with regards
to poor communication in all facets and a "stink" factor that leads one to
believe that this project was railroaded through at the behest of the
MCWD.
It appears this project is now an "all or none" proposition for the City of
Edina.
So, let me get this straight:
An entity has a vested interest in government official(s) following
through with an entity's plan.
The entity offers a government official(s) a large sum of money ($1.6
million) only if those officals act in the entity's interest. If not the
offer of money is withdrawn.
or...
The entity, now healthier from the official(s) accepting of the gift,
finds itself in a more favorable position (through something as
minimal as public perception or the ability to raise more funds).
I'm no lawyer, but i do have a pretty good sense of right and wrong. This
to me has at least the appearance of bribery. Maybe the Star Tribune
would call it undue influence. Or perhaps "business as usual" in a system
of government run by different government agencies' quid pro quos where
neither government agency is accountable to its citizenry but to other
government agencies.
I would think the MCWD would have a great interest in improving the
creek as it runs through Arden Park. They could just be more creative,
and head to the drawing board without removing a beloved waterfall
where people come together to relax and enjoy some of their favorite
activities. What would it cost? I'm certain a lot less than $1.6 million.
Below are the "guiding principles" as to be seen on the MCWD's website:
Guiding Principles
Partnership – We seek to understand the goals of others so that we can
meaningfully integrate our work to add broader value to the community.
Innovation – We are flexible and creative in our approach and strive for
continuous improvement.
Excellence – We commit to work that achieves outstanding results and honors our
partners.
Sound Science – We are a trusted source of scientific data and analyses that
provide the foundation for wise decisions.
Service – We are responsive and accountable to our communities and careful
stewards of public funds.
The highlights are mine, the unenlisted guiding principles are the
MCWDs.
stan
p.s. i wouldn't want to have to explain to a government oversite board why
my project was an "all or none" in terms of helping the areas of human
endeavor that i am charged with. that can lead to questions about
agendas.
Stanley Edgar Davis MD, FACOG
5509 Woodcrest Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Cell: 612 839-7322
(Please text if convenient.)
E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication, along with any documents, files or attachments, is intended
only for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of any information
contained in or attached to this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original communication and its attachments without reading,printing or saving in any manner. Thank you.
From: Tom Jones <tom@renex.us>
To: jim@jimgrotz.com; edinacreekside@yahoo.com;
EdinaMail@edinamn.gov
Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 12:57 PM
Subject: Arden Park
Tweeted today in response to city of Edina tweet. As you know, I/we have
all the accurate maps, topos, grade percentage, quantity of trees and
1000s of feet of retention and access, safety work conditions per OSHA,
Uniform Building Code, and physical examination of impacted west ridge
areas ( inaccurate in proposal, preceding ignored or eliminated from
research and preceding request for funding approval). At least one council
member has stated " will go on watershed expert recommendations". This
in spite of nearly unanimous neighborhood objections ( most living on or
facing park not contacted for input, contrary to "pitch" for funding
representation). What is the point of a council voting on major impactful
issues, that are unwilling to look at the hard data, or listen to residents?
Look at the "tweet" and its appurtenant links to the watershed document,
and ask why the city is ignoring public outcry, the facts concerning
immediate 6-30' elevation changes at the work site and construction
access requirements, the retention, access roads, "struck by" and soil
stabilization and level work spaces, grades exceeding 45% ( all addressed
by OSHA and codes, and all applicable), the 100s of healthy native trees
to be removed ( habitat and soil stabilization on a sand ridge), the non
insurable components of working in a floodway together with liability risks
probable therein, and the likely millions of dollars in retention, fencing, and
falling safety requirements during and after construction and unmentioned
in the proposal? The population needs to be aware of this position, who
the responsible voting parties are, and the level of due diligence
undertaken by these individuals ( or lack thereof).
Please tweet additional comments and concerns, publish contact info for
responsible parties, and email via contacts and ND, the several hundred
people that have already signed a petition and the 80+% that have
indicated they oppose the present plan ( noting the watershed has been
adamant in their position that it is " an all or nothing" proposal, and the
precedent facts do not support the claim by them of "extensive
neighborhood input and support". Under laws concerning and affecting
homeowners and real estate professionals in the state, people should be
required to disclose in any potentially impacted property in the area ( up or
down stream) "material facts". That defined as information pertinent to a
dwelling or changes proposed or planned for an area, that affect the quiet
enjoyment or value of the property. This clearly falls meets the threshold
of mandatory disclosure. T
Sent from my iPhone
From:Susan Schultz
To:Edina Mail
Subject:The proposed towers near 70th and France
Date:Wednesday, June 07, 2017 11:52:59 PM
Dear City Council Members,
I live in Edina (5217 Abercrombie) and drive down 70th to France many times in a week. I am not opposed to
development, however, I am very dismayed that a developer has proposed high rise buildings at 70th and France.
High rise buildings spoil the landscape in that commercial area. Aesthetically, they are a mismatch.
Please say no to high rise buildings in that location. Lower buildings, such as the height of the Westin, are more
suitable.
Thanks for considering my views as you work with this proposal.
Susan K. Schultz, Ph.D.
Office: 952.842.0299
Mobile: 952.412.4472
From:Mike Hirschberg
To:Edina Mail
Subject:The amount of new multi-family development is troubling
Date:Thursday, June 08, 2017 3:51:11 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Dear City Council,
As an Edina resident (property tax payer) and employee, I find the continuous urge from the city to
receive solicited multi-family building projects disturbing and counterproductive. As a non-native
Minnesotan, I was attracted to Edina because of its well-established communities and neighborhoods,
strong park systems, quality public school system and ease of access to the larger Metro area.
Since buying our house in 2014, I’ve noticed an increasingly poor trend when it comes to congestion,
particularly along France Ave., but throughout several spots in Edina. Frequently I am seeing developers
pitch and win new construction and development in and around the Galleria and Southdale. Unless Edina
is planning on expanding France to 5 lanes in each direction (it’s only 1 lane in each direction between 62
and Excelsior Blvd!) , Xerxes to 3-4 lanes in each direction, it’s simply demonstrating a lack of awareness
regarding basic planning and strategic development. Yet, I continue to see articles such as this pop up in
my news feed:
http://www.startribune.com/edina-council-greets-residential-towers-in-lukewarm-
fashion/427094031/
Attracting a larger tax base with multi-family units only puts more strain on the existing mediocre
infrastructure and causes nothing but aggravation for your residents, workforce and visitors. It also isn’t
what made Edina a highly desirable place to live to begin with, and certainly not the place that I decided
to move to several years ago. We surely aren’t going to see any tax breaks because of an increased
base, so there is no upside appeal for residents.
If this City Council wants to act in the best interests of its constituents and keep Edina a thriving,
enjoyable community, I suggest it thinks much more critically about the impact of decisions such as multi-
family development. I’m more than happy to discuss my feelings further if desired.
Your concerned citizen,
Mike
Mike Hirschberg | Vice President | Wipfli Corporate Finance Advisors LLC
Office: 952-548-3409
7601 France Avenue South, Suite 400, Minneapolis, MN 55435
www.wcfadvisors.com | mhirschberg@wcfadvisors.com | LinkedIn
From:suckowziemer@comcast.net
To:Edina Mail; Scott H. Neal; Lisa Schaefer
Subject:Traffic at Tracy Avenue & Hwy 62/Power outages
Date:Monday, June 12, 2017 11:31:48 AM
Dear Council Members, Mr. Neal and Ms. Schaefer:
I am writing to share a couple of my concerns.
First, I'm concerned about traffic at the exits from Hwy. 62 on to Tracy Avenue. During
evening rush hours (4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m.) and morning rush hour during the public
school year, it is difficult to make a left (sometimes a right) turn on to Tracy Ave. after
exiting the highway. Generally, during the day or on weekends, this is less of a
problem. But the problem during rush hour is so pronounced I would like to know
what the city is doing to address this (obviously in collaboration with county and/or
state).
It seems much of the traffic going North/South on Tracy is significantly over the speed
limit (seems close to 40 mph) making it more difficult because there is not a sufficient
gap in cars to make a turn safely. In addition, drivers from Valley View trying to go
straight to enter 62 West treat the intersection as a 4-way stop, meaning they think
the car that was at the intersection first has right of way, rather than giving the car
going straight right of way vs. the car making a left turn. This adds to a lot of
indecision. I'm hesitant to turn left in front of a car going straight during rush hour
when there is so much traffic and to make any turn you need to drive quickly to get
through the intersection.
I realize adding street lights means additional cost and might be the responsibility of
the state, but given the high volume of traffic on Tracy Avenue due to drivers using it
as a commuting road (meaning higher speeds and high volume of cars), it seems
lights that could be made to turn into a four-way stop during rush hours and changed
to two-way other times, would help. We have lived in the neighborhood about eight
years and the problem seems to increase each year.
Second, yesterday we experienced our third power outage in just over 3 weeks. We
lost power May 19 (about 5 hours), again on June 10 (about 5 hours) and then June
11-12 (over 24 hours). With more violent storms the norm as a result of climate
change, I would like to know what the city, Xcel Energy and the state are doing in
collaboration to prepare and secure power to better protect electrical service given
that we can expect these kinds of events with regularity.
Thank you for reading my concerns. I would appreciate some follow up including
recommendations for county or state officials I should be in contact with.
Sincerely,
Holly Ziemer
5900 Olinger Blvd.
Edina, MN 55436
From:Sally Kamps
To:Edina Mail
Subject:50th st. expansion
Date:Wednesday, June 14, 2017 10:49:50 PM
Edina City Council—I have been a resident of Edina for over 50 years, living in Morningside, Browndale Ave, and
currently in White Oaks. I am very concerned about the density of the project on 49 1/2 St. Traffic on 50th St. is so
congested now, that side streets are being used as a bypass. Who is in charge of Traffic in the Village?? It is almost
impossible at times to get in and out of Edina.
Is there a comprehensive plan now for development in Edina? It seems very uncontrolled with all the tear downs
and rebuilds next to a small house. The market is so tight now for young couples to afford to live in Edina—are
they not the future and the age group we should be attracting???
I cannot attend the meeting, but I would hope that you would seriously take a hard look at the unintended
consequences of this development
Sincerely
Sally Kamps
4009 W. 48th St.
Edina
From:Amy Chamberlain
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Thank you for voting NO to the condo building on France Avenue
Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 12:23:45 PM
Hello Edina City Council,
My name is Amy Smith. I wanted to write and thank you for voting against the proposed
condo building on France Avenue. My parents have lived in the
Cornelia/Southdale neighborhood for close to 29 years; I was born and raised there. I now
live in Minneapolis but am in the Southdale area several times a week.
I am excited that Edina continues to be a thriving community that is looking to grow and
flourish by building more housing. Unlike Mayor Hovland, I do not believe that the
neighborhood just needs to get over the height issue otherwise we will be "aging and into a
state of demise."
There has been a lot of positive development throughout Edina over the past decade;
especially in the Cornelia/Southdale area. Edina can still continue to grow and flourish into an
urban area without building 360ft skyscrapers.
I urge you to continue to keep the neighbors in mind and stick to your initial gut. Vote "no" on
this project!
Thank you,
Amy Smith
From:Lisa Turner
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Arden Park
Date:Thursday, June 15, 2017 3:17:09 PM
Dear City Council,
The residents on or nearest the park are affected the most by the proposed changes to the park.
We have so many wonderful parks in Edina and nearby Minneapolis that are more manicured and
give access to walking etc. Arden Park is a more “natural” setting. By putting in walking paths and
observation decks etc . the park is turned into a “planned and manicured” park, not a wild natural
setting. Also, there is a cost to the proposed changes. Shouldn’t the residents decide if we “need”
to spend more money on something like this? I think most people agree that dead wood can be
taken down and a few updates would be nice but to change the flow of the creek, take out trees to
add “observation lookouts” and add more paths just doesn’t make sense. I hope you really count
the emails you receive “in favor of” vs. “not in favor” of the current proposed plan and weigh that
against what the watershed wants to do. They don’t know what’s best for our community, we do!
Thank you for your consideration of my comments,
Best Regards,
Lisa Turner
Woodland Road
From:Becky Christopher
Subject:MCWD Capital Improvement Plan
Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 1:23:30 PM
Attachments:MCWD 2017-2021 CIP_Draft.pdf
Dear City and County Administrators, Mayors, and Staff,
As it does each year at this time, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD or District) is
distributing its annually-revised Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for your review and comment. Your
input on the draft CIP is valuable in helping to identify new opportunities to work together to
improve water resources.
This annually-revised CIP contains only those projects that are currently in development and have an
estimated schedule and budget. The District is currently finalizing its draft Comprehensive Water
Resources Management Plan (Plan) which will be distributed for review and comment in late June.
The Plan will contain a 10-year CIP that will include a broader list of potential projects throughout
the watershed. Many of these projects will be opportunity-driven to allow the District to respond to
land use change and partnership opportunities that arise during the 10-year plan cycle. We
encourage cities, counties, and other partners to approach the District with project opportunities
that may then be incorporated into the District’s annual CIP or considered for cost share grants
based on timing, alignment with District goals, and available funding.
The annual CIP identifies potential funding sources for the projects as well as the estimated
breakdown of District and outside costs. The estimated MCWD costs listed do not represent actual
budget projections for these years as they do not account for projects that are levied over multiple
years or financed through the counties or project partners.
The draft CIP is attached for your review. You are invited to submit comments on the proposed draft
CIP as well as suggestions for how the District can better integrate its water resource improvement
efforts with land use planning in your community. Please submit comments via mail or email
(provided below) no later than July 17, 2017. Feel free to contact me with any questions.
Sincerely,
Becky Christopher
Lead Planner & Project Manager
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
15320 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55345
952-641-4512 || www.minnehahacreek.org
Su
b
w
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
S
o
u
r
c
e
s
Estimated MCWD CostsEstimated Outside Funding
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
W
i
d
e
C
o
s
t
S
h
a
r
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
MC
W
D
i
s
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
r
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
i
n
g
i
t
s
g
r
a
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
a
n
d
e
x
p
e
c
t
s
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
a
c
c
e
p
t
i
n
g
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
2
0
1
8
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
-$ -$
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Re
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
,
t
r
a
i
l
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
r
e
a
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
b
e
t
t
e
r
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
M
C
W
D
L
e
v
y
203,000 $ -$
La
k
e
S
t
D
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
D
i
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
M
e
t
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
a
n
d
H
o
p
k
i
n
s
t
o
d
i
v
e
r
t
3
0
a
c
r
e
s
o
f
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
f
o
r
v
o
l
u
m
e
a
n
d
l
o
a
d
r
e
d
u
ct
i
o
n
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
F
A
G
r
a
n
t
(
$
1
2
4
,
5
0
0
)
124,500 $ 124,500 $
Ea
s
t
A
u
b
u
r
n
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
t
h
V
i
c
t
o
r
i
a
t
o
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
t
i
e
s
t
o
t
r
e
a
t
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
d
o
w
nt
o
w
n
a
n
d
C
h
u
r
c
h
L
a
k
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
V
i
c
t
o
r
i
a
(
$
6
5
,
6
3
0
)
,
B
W
S
R
C
W
F
G
r
a
n
t
(
$
2
6
2
,
5
2
0
)
-$ 328,150 $
Si
x
M
i
l
e
C
a
r
p
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
r
p
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
a
n
d
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
15,000 $ -$
Pa
i
n
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
F
l
o
o
d
D
a
m
a
g
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
c
a
t
t
l
e
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
d
a
m
a
g
e
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
2
0
1
4
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
r
e
p
a
i
r
e
d
i
n
e
x
c
h
a
n
g
e
f
o
r
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
e
a
s
e
m
e
nt
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
F
E
M
A
G
r
a
n
t
(
$
2
5
,
4
8
0
)
28,354 $ 25,480 $ 370,854 $ 478,130 $
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
W
i
d
e
C
o
s
t
S
h
a
r
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Co
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
g
r
a
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
b
y
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
500,000 $ -$
32
5
B
l
a
k
e
R
d
D
e
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
De
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
i
t
e
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
f
o
r
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
a
n
d
r
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
(
H
e
n
n
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
,
D
E
E
D
,
M
e
t
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
)
2,000,000 $ 1,500,000 $
Gr
e
e
n
w
a
y
t
o
C
e
d
a
r
T
r
a
i
l
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
P
a
r
k
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
t
o
C
e
d
a
r
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
T
r
a
i
l
a
n
d
r
es
t
o
r
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
b
a
n
k
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
(
$
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
C
i
t
y
o
f
S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
P
a
r
k
,
D
N
R
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
T
r
a
i
l
F
u
n
d
200,000 $ 311,000 $
Lo
u
i
s
i
a
n
a
T
r
a
i
l
C
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
P
a
r
k
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
t
r
a
i
l
s
u
n
d
e
r
L
o
u
i
s
i
a
n
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
C
i
t
y
o
f
St. Louis Park ($150,000)150,000 $ 150,000 $
Me
a
d
o
w
b
r
o
o
k
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
B
o
a
r
d
f
o
r
s
t
r
e
a
m
a
n
d
e
c
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
on
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
M
P
R
B
(
$
7
2
7
,
7
1
5
)
,
H
e
n
n
e
p
i
n
C
o
u
n
t
y
G
r
a
n
t
(
$
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
)
1,372,285 $ 827,715 $
Fl
o
o
d
D
a
m
a
g
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
s
Fl
o
o
d
d
a
m
a
g
e
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
l
o
n
g
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
i
n
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
F
E
M
A
G
r
a
n
t
(
$
5
1
2
,
0
0
0
)
,
B
W
S
R
C
W
F
G
r
a
n
t
($35,952)368,988 $ 547,952 $
Ar
d
e
n
P
a
r
k
S
t
r
e
a
m
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a
f
o
r
s
t
r
e
a
m
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
C
i
t
y
o
f
E
d
i
n
a, Grants (BWSR CWF, NRICH, DNR)1,502,722 $ 2,620,153 $
Ca
r
p
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
r
p
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
a
n
d
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
-$ 535,650 $
Wa
s
s
e
r
m
a
n
n
W
e
s
t
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
C
i
t
y
o
f
V
i
c
t
o
r
i
a
f
o
r
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
c
c
e
s
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
C
i
t
y
o
f
V
i
c
toria 317,560 $ 1,941,600 $ 6,411,555 $ 8,434,070 $
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
W
i
d
e
C
o
s
t
S
h
a
r
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Co
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
g
r
a
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
b
y
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
500,000 $ -$
32
5
B
l
a
k
e
R
d
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
a
n
d
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
Ex
p
a
n
d
t
h
e
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
t
r
e
a
t
2
6
8
a
c
r
e
s
o
f
d
i
v
e
r
t
e
d
r
u
n
o
f
f
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
u
b
l
i
c
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
A
u
t
h
o
r
i
t
y
1,069,625 $ 1,069,625 $
Bo
o
n
e
-
A
q
u
i
l
a
F
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
Co
l
l
a
b
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
t
o
c
r
e
a
t
e
f
l
o
o
d
p
l
a
i
n
s
t
o
r
a
g
e
a
n
d
p
a
r
k
l
a
n
d
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
on
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
C
i
t
y
o
f
S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
P
a
r
k
,
P
r
i
v
a
t
e
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
150,000 $ 350,000 $
Co
t
t
a
g
e
v
i
l
l
e
P
a
r
k
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
1
3
0
8
/
1
3
1
2
L
a
k
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
f
o
r
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
c
r
e
e
k
a
c
c
e
s
s
M
C
W
D
L
e
v
y
276,000 $ -$
Ca
r
p
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
r
p
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
a
n
d
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
118,825 $ 118,825 $
Mu
d
L
a
k
e
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
h
a
s
e
I
Ph
a
s
e
d
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
M
u
d
L
a
k
e
d
r
ai
n
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
p
h
o
s
p
h
o
r
u
s
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
t
o
M
u
d
L
a
k
e
a
n
d
H
a
l
s
te
d
B
a
y
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
560,000 $ 560,000 $
Tu
r
b
i
d
-
L
u
n
s
t
e
n
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
We
t
l
a
n
d
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
o
i
l
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
h
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
,
a
n
d
f
i
l
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
e
h
a
n
c
e
d
p
h
os
p
h
o
r
u
s
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
440,312 $ 440,312 $
Pi
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
H
e
a
d
w
a
t
e
r
s
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
o
w
n
e
r
s
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
n
u
t
r
i
e
n
t
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
t
o
P
i
e
r
s
o
n
L
a
k
e
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
rtner Support 367,800 $ -$
Pa
i
n
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
P
a
i
n
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
P
o
t
a
t
o
)
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
U
.
S
.
A
r
m
y
C
o
r
p
s
o
f
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
t
o
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
w
e
t
l
an
d
a
n
d
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
P
o
t
a
t
o
M
a
r
s
h
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
U
S
A
C
E
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
0
6
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
-$ 870,000 $ 3,482,562 $ 3,408,762 $
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
W
i
d
e
C
o
s
t
S
h
a
r
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Co
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
g
r
a
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
b
y
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
500,000 $ -$
Me
a
d
o
w
b
r
o
o
k
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
M
P
R
B
,
S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
P
a
r
k
a
n
d
E
d
i
n
a
t
o
e
x
p
a
n
d
t
h
e
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
i
n
t
o
T
od
d
P
a
r
k
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
300,000 $ 650,000 $
We
s
t
B
l
a
k
e
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
H
o
p
k
i
n
s
a
n
d
S
t
.
L
o
u
i
s
P
a
r
k
t
o
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
e
x
p
a
n
d
t
h
e
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y
M
C
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
TBD 1 TBD 1
Mi
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
S
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
M
i
n
n
e
a
p
o
l
i
s
a
n
d
M
P
R
B
t
o
r
e
m
o
v
e
o
u
t
f
a
l
l
s
i
n
t
o
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
s
t
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
B
M
P
s
M
C
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
700,000 $ 700,000 $
Hi
a
w
a
t
h
a
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
M
P
R
B
t
o
r
e
p
a
i
r
f
l
o
o
d
d
a
m
a
g
e
,
m
a
n
a
g
e
s
t
r
o
m
w
a
t
e
r
r
u
n
o
f
f
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
ek
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
TBD 2 TBD 2
Wa
s
s
e
r
m
a
n
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
L
o
a
d
i
n
g
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Ch
e
m
i
c
a
l
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
i
n
v
a
s
i
v
e
a
q
u
a
t
i
c
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
c
a
r
p
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
115,800 $ 115,800 $
Mu
d
L
a
k
e
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
Ph
a
s
e
d
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
M
u
d
L
a
k
e
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
p
h
o
s
p
h
o
r
u
s
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
t
o
M
u
d
L
a
k
e
a
n
d
H
a
l
st
e
d
B
a
y
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
1,065,000 $ 1,065,000 $
Ca
r
p
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
r
p
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
a
n
d
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
117,825 $ 117,825 $
Pa
i
n
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
Po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
a
m
b
a
n
k
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
a
n
d
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
U
S
A
C
E
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
300,000 $ -$
Pa
i
n
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
S
O
B
I
)
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
U
.
S
.
A
r
m
y
C
o
r
p
s
o
f
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
t
o
r
e
s
t
o
r
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
a
n
d
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
S
O
B
I
M
a
r
s
h
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
U
S
A
C
E
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
0
6
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
-$ 242,000 $ 3,098,625 $ 2,890,625 $
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
-
W
i
d
e
C
o
s
t
S
h
a
r
e
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Co
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
g
r
a
n
t
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
b
y
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
500,000 $ -$
Ea
s
t
A
u
b
u
r
n
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
We
t
l
a
n
d
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
s
o
i
l
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
o
u
t
l
e
t
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
,
a
n
d
l
a
k
e
o
u
t
f
l
o
w
b
y
p
a
s
s
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
125,000 $ 125,000 $
Ha
l
s
t
e
d
B
a
y
A
l
u
m
I
n
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
Of
f
-
l
i
n
e
a
l
u
m
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
S
i
x
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
5,039,703 $ 5,039,703 $
Mu
d
L
a
k
e
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
h
a
s
e
I
I
I
Ph
a
s
e
d
r
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
M
u
d
L
a
k
e
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
p
h
o
s
p
h
o
r
u
s
l
o
a
d
i
n
g
t
o
M
u
d
L
a
k
e
a
n
d
H
a
ls
t
e
d
B
a
y
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
690,000 $ 690,000 $
Ca
r
p
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
Ca
r
p
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
a
n
d
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
P
a
r
t
n
e
r
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
G
r
a
n
t
s
10,825 $ 10,825 $
Pa
i
n
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
P
a
i
n
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
P
a
i
n
t
e
r
M
a
r
s
h
)
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
w
i
t
h
U
.
S
.
A
r
m
y
C
o
r
p
s
o
f
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
t
o
r
e
s
t
o
re
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
a
n
d
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
w
i
t
h
i
n
P
a
i
n
t
e
r
M
a
r
s
h
MC
W
D
L
e
v
y
,
U
S
A
C
E
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
2
0
6
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
-$ 2,804,000 $ 6,365,528 $ 8,669,528 $
1 Th
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
i
t
s
p ar
t
n
e
r
s
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
e
x
p lo
r
e
o
pp
or
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y t
h
r
o
u
g h
t
h
e
M
i
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
G
r
e
e
n
w
a
y .
U
n
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
t
y r
e
g ar
d
i
n
g p ro
j ec
t
s
c
o
p e,
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g o
pp
or
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
m
a
k
e
a
c
o
s
t
p ro j ection difficult at this time.
2 Th
e
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
a
n
d
i
t
s
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
e
x
p
l
o
r
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
H
i
a
w
a
t
h
a
G
o
l
f
C
o
u
r
s
e
t
h
a
t
w
i
l
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
ac
c
e
s
s
a
n
d
n
a
t
u
r
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
U
n
c
e
r
t
a
i
n
t
y
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
c
o
p
e,
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
m
a
k
e
a
c
o
s
t
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
d
i
fficult at this time.
Th
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
c
a
p
i
t
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
l
a
n
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
l
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
t
h
a
t
a
r
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
i
n
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
h
a
v
e
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
t
o
m
o
v
e
f
or
w
a
r
d
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
o
n
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
,
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
,
a
n
d
s
ec
u
r
i
n
g
o
f
l
a
n
d
r
i
g
h
t
s
a
n
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
.
T
h
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
M
C
W
D
c
o
s
t
s
l
i
s
t
e
d
d
o
n
o
t
r
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
c
t
u
a
l
b
u
d
g
e
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
e
y
e
a
r
s
a
s
t
h
e
y
d
o
n
o
t
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
f
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
th
a
t
a
r
e
l
e
v
i
e
d
o
v
e
r
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
y
e
a
r
s
o
r
f
i
n
a
n
c
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
c
o
u
nt
i
e
s
o
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
.
Si
x
M
i
l
e
-
H
a
l
s
t
e
d
B
a
y
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
W
a
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
20
1
7
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
Si
x
M
i
l
e
-
H
a
l
s
t
e
d
B
a
y
20
1
8
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
Si
x
M
i
l
e
-
H
a
l
s
t
e
d
B
a
y
20
1
9
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
Si
x
M
i
l
e
-
H
a
l
s
t
e
d
B
a
y
20
2
0
Mi
n
n
e
h
a
h
a
C
r
e
e
k
Si
x
M
i
l
e
-
H
a
l
s
t
e
d
B
a
y
Pa
i
n
t
e
r
C
r
e
e
k
20
2
1
DRAFT
From:david cartwright
To:Edina Mail
Subject:Edina Collaborative
Date:Friday, June 16, 2017 8:10:39 PM
Edina City Council members:
I have lived on 48th st for the past 7+ years. The 50/France area has progressively gotten busier over time, it has
become problematic most days to cross over to the Minneapolis side of 48t st due to traffic (aggressive fast drivers).
I oppose the Edina Collaborative effort/6 story development project. I will vote my disapproval of this project
(should it proceed) by moving out of the area. The perceived costs outweigh the benefits for me to remain. New
faculty at my work commonly ask: where are there good neighborhoods to locate to? -Edina will lose my support in
those discussions. Thanks for listening to my opinion.
David Cartwright
From:Sydney Kase
To:Edina Mail
Subject:50th & France Redevelopment
Date:Saturday, June 17, 2017 3:59:44 PM
Dear Edina City Council,
We are writing to express our strong opposition to the proposed redevelopment along West
49 1/2 Street in Edina. As longtime residents of Edina and occupants of a house on Maple
Road which is in close proximity to the area in question, we believe the redevelopment will
produce the following highly undesirable impacts on our neighborhood:
1. Greatly increased traffic congestion. Maple Road and the access routes to 50th Street
and France Avenue are a nightmare already in the morning and evening rush hour
times.
2. Unsightly, and out of place profile for the 50th & France area, particularly if the
redevelopment features six story buildings.
3. Changing the character and nature of the area, which has been charming, walkable, and
small scale for decades.
We urge to seriously consider greatly reducing the size and impact of this redevelopment so
that the area stays true to what its residents value and desire.
Thank you,
Sydney Kase and Scott Glickstein
Sent from Outlook
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: C .1.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:Mic hael F rey, Art C enter G eneral Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes : Arts & C ulture C ommis s io n, March 23,
2017
Info rmatio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
T here is no action required on this item.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
P lease read and review the minutes from the M arch 23, 2017 meeting of the Arts & C ulture C ommission. T hank
you.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Minutes , Arts & Culture Commis s ion 2017-03-23
Draft Minutes ☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: April 27, 2017
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Arts and Culture Commission
Edina Art Center Studio 14
March 23, 2017
4:30 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Vice Chair Cheryl Gunness called the meeting to order at 4:34 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Commissioners Present: Susan Chandler, Cheryl Gunness, Douglas Hegley, Russ Rubin and
Steve Suckow.
Commissioners Absent: Stella Chaffee, Kandace Ellis, Ray Meifert and Anne
Miller. Student Representatives Present: Jane Howe.
Student Representatives Absent: Mollie Mertes
Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center.
III. Approval of Meeting Agenda
Motion by Commissioner Rubin with second by Commissioner Suckow to approve the
meeting agenda. Motion carried.
IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes
A. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting Minutes of January 26, 2017
Motion by Commissioner Rubin with second by Commissioner Suckow to approve the
regular minutes of the January 26, 2017 meeting. Motion carried.
V. Special Recognitions and Presentations
No recognitions or presentations.
VI. Community Comment
Draft Minutes ☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: April 27, 2017
Two students from Southview Middle School government class introduced themselves.
VII. Reports/Recommendations
A. Elections
New members Susan Chandler and Douglas Hegley introduced themselves to the
Commission. Members went around the table with introductions.
Staff Liaison Frey noted that Commissioner Miller, though absent, had expressed her willingness
to continue to serve as Chair of the Arts & Culture Commission.
Motion by Commissioner Suckow with second by Commissioner Rubin to elect Anne Miller
as Chair of the Edina Arts & Culture Commission to serve a three-year term. Motion passed
unanimously.
Vice Chair Gunness opened the floor for nominations for Vice Chair. Member Gunness stated as she
is the current Chair of Public Art Edina, she would like to step down as Vice Chair of the Commission.
After some discussion, Member Chandler expressed an interest in the position.
Motion by Commissioner Rubin with second by Commissioner Suckow to elect Susan Chandler
as Vice Chair of the Edina Arts & Culture Commission to serve a one-year term. Motion carried.
A. 2017 Work Plan – Initiative 1, Study Feasibility of a new Art Center
Commissioner Gunness led the conversation regarding the feasibility of a new art center. She gave a
brief review of the visit by City Manager Scott Neal and Director of Parks and Recreation Ann Kattreh
at the February 2017 Arts & Culture Commission meeting. Member Gunness noted that City Council
was ‘interested’ in a new Art Center.
Member Gunness spoke about the Arts & Culture’s current priorities for the new members, and
discussed the vision of the Commission. Visits to other art centers, such as Artistry in Bloomington
and the Minnetonka Center for the Arts, were mentioned.
A discussion of a mission and vision statement for the Arts & Culture Commission followed. Russ
Rubin offered to lead a committee to re-write the current mission statement and a vision. Douglas
Hegley offered his assistance.
A discussion of the Art Center and funding followed to update new members.
VIII. Correspondence And Petitions
A. Public Art Edina Report
Public Art Edina Chair Cheryl Gunness gave a brief verbal update on the 12 sculptors that
had submitted a total of 27 entries for the 2017-2018 Call for Sculpture. Selection Saturday is
March 25, 2017.
IX. Chair and Member Comments
None.
Draft Minutes ☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: April 27, 2017
X. Staff
Comments None.
XI. Adjournment
A motion to adjourn was voiced by Commissioner Suckow with a second by Commissioner
Rubin. Motion carried. The Arts & Culture Commission meeting was adjourned at 6:12 p.m.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: C .2.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:Mic hael F rey, Art C enter G eneral Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes : Arts & C ulture C ommis s io n, F ebruary 23,
2017
Info rmatio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
T here is no action required on this item.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
P lease read and review the minutes from the F ebruary 23, 2017 meeting of the Arts & C ulture C ommission.
T hank you.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Minutes , Arts & Culture Commis s ion 2017-02-23
Draft Minutes ☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: April 27, 2017
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Arts and Culture Commission
Edina Art Center Studio 14
February 23, 2017
4:30 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Chair Anne Miller called the meeting to order at 4:41 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Commissioners Present: Stella Chaffee, Cheryl Gunness, Anne Miller and Russ Rubin.
Commissioners Absent: Kandace Ellis, Barbara La Valleur, Ray Meifert and Steve Suckow.
Student Representatives Present: Jane Howe and Mollie Mertes.
Staff Present: Scott Neal, City Manager, Ann Kattreh, Director of Parks and Recreation, Michael Frey,
General Manager, Edina Art Center.
III. Approval of Meeting Agenda
With no quorum, the meeting agenda was not approved.
IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes
A. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting Minutes of January 26, 2017
With no quorum, the meeting minutes of January 26, 2017 were not approved.
V. Special Recognitions and Presentations
No recognitions or presentations.
VI. Community Comment
Planning Commission Member Sheila Berube introduced herself.
VII. Reports/Recommendations
A. 2017 Work Plan – Initiative 7, Assist with City of Edina Comprehensive Plan
Draft Minutes ☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: April 27, 2017
Planning Commission Member Sheila Berube gave a brief presentation on the work of the
Planning Commission on the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan. She stated each member of the
Planning Commission would be a representative to every board and commission. Ms. Berube
would be the liaison to the Arts and Culture Commission.
B. Elections
The election of officers was tabled to the March 2017 meeting due to a lack of quorum.
C. 2017 Work Plan – Initiative 1, Study Feasibility of a new Art Center
City Manager Scott Neal stated that City Council was supportive and “interested” in a new facility for the
arts, though had not given direction to staff to pursue further research and work on the project.
Manager Neal was thankful for the Commission’s excitement and energy around the subject and asked
for patience as direction from City Council was needed before anything further could be done.
Manager Neal and Director Kattreh left the meeting. The Commissioners discussed next steps.
VIII. Correspondence And Petitions
A. Music in Edina Report
B. Public Art Edina Report
IX. Chair and Member Comments
None.
X. Staff Comments
None.
XI. Adjournment
The meeting ended at 5:40 p.m.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: C .3.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:Mic hael F rey, Art C enter G eneral Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes : Arts & C ulture C ommis s io n, Ap ril 27, 2017 Info rmatio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
T here is no action required on this item.
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
P lease read and review the minutes from the April 27, 2017 meeting of the Arts & C ulture C ommission. T hank
you.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Minutes , Arts & Culture Commis s ion 2017-04-27
Draft Minutes ☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: May 25, 2017
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Arts and Culture Commission
Edina Art Center Studio 14
April 27, 2017
4:30 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Chair Anne Miller called the meeting to order at 4:31 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Commissioners Present: Stella Chaffee, Susan Chandler, Cheryl Gunness, Ray Meifert, Anne Miller, Russ
Rubin and Steve Suckow.
Commissioners Absent: Douglas Hegley
Student Representatives Present: Jane Howe
Student Representatives Absent: Mollie Mertes
Staff Present: Michael Frey, General Manager, Edina Art Center.
III. Approval of Meeting Agenda
Motion by Commissioner Rubin with second by Commissioner Suckow to approve the meeting
agenda as amended to include Work Plan items 1-7. Motion carried as amended.
IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes
A. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting Minutes of March 23, 2017
B. Approval of Minutes – Regular Meeting Minutes of February 23, 2017
Motion by Commissioner Chandler with second by Commissioner Suckow to approve the regular
minutes of the March 23, 2017 meeting. Motion carried.
Motion by Commissioner Suckow with second by Commissioner Rubin to approve the regular
minutes of the February 23, 2017 meeting. Motion carried.
V. Special Recognitions and Presentations
No recognitions or presentations.
VI. Community Comment
Draft Minutes ☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: May 25, 2017
Sheila Berube of the Planning Commission attended the Arts & Culture Commission meeting and
encouraged everyone to attend the May 3 meeting at Public Works regarding the Comprehensive
Plan. Member Suckow asked about the visioning exercise performed by the City previously and
Ms. Berube stated the strategic planning session would be about execution. The last Met Council
plan for the City of Edina was created in 2007.
VII. Reports/Recommendations
A. 2017 Arts & Culture Commission Work Plan Initiative 1-7
A discussion took place by the Commission regarding a strategy and visioning for a potential new art
center in the City of Edina.
Member Suckow offered to lead an effort to research the feasibility of continuing the working group
Music in Edina.
VIII. Correspondence And Petitions
A. Public Art Edina Report
Commissioner Gunness provided a report that the sculpture installs and de-installs was progressing
smoothly. The Opening Reception to Honor the Sculptors will be held Wednesday, June 14, 2017 from
5-7 p.m. at Pinstripes Bistro with the Mayor in attendance.
Commissioner Gunness reported on a vision for fundraising to be shared:
• Build community through art that is thought provoking and meaningful,
• Have a goal of raising $10,000 for 2017,
• Increase sculptor stipends from $500 to $1000,
• Start an Artist in Residence program housed at the Edina Art Center that would help curate
exciting participatory community building artwork with the hope of expanding the idea of
public art from the model of sculptures,
• Increase the budget by fundraising,
• Build “Friends” list through the Opening Reception for Sculptures,
• Edina Fall into the Arts event – ping pong table, community dining table
• Work with Shannon Stevens to build an app for public art sculptures and locations
Member Chaffee offered a suggestion for fundraising through an app.
IX. Chair and Member Comments
None.
X. Staff Comments
None.
Draft Minutes ☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: May 25, 2017
XI. Adjournment
A motion to adjourn was voiced by Commissioner Suckow with a second by Commissioner Rubin.
Motion carried. The Arts & Culture Commission meeting was adjourned at 6:12 p.m.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: C .4.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:S ulekha Mo hamed, Executive As s is tant
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes : Energy & Enviro nment C ommis s ion, May
11, 2017
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
M inutes from M ay 11, 2017 E nergy & Environment C ommission meeting.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Minutes : Energy & Environment Commis s ion, May 11, 2017
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date:
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Energy and Environment Commission
Edina City Hall Community Room
Thursday, May 11, 2017, 7:00 PM
I. Call To Order
Chair Manser called the meeting to order at 7:00p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering Roll Call were Burmeister, Glahn, Horan, Jackson, Kostuch, Manser, Satterlee,
Seeley, Shanmugavel, and Waddick.
Late:
Absent: Hoffman, Kim, Madhok
Staff Present: Liaison Brown, Sulekha Mohamed
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion made by Member Waddick to approve the Meeting Agenda. Motion seconded by
Member Shanmugavel. Motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
A. Commissioner Satterlee wanted to amend the minutes to the following under “Reports/
Recommendations” following “2017 EEC Work Plan: Initiative 8 Forum” to state:
iv. Commissioners have selected venue locations in order of priority; Braemar
Clubhouse, Edina High School, and Public Works.
vi. Commissioners recommended budget amount of roughly $3500.00 (Two
$1000 sponsors, $1500 EEC budget).
B. Commissioner Satterlee wanted to amend the minutes to the following to state:
Motion made by Satterlee to add new Member Shanmugavel and remove Elizabeth
Stroik from existing Education Outreach Working Group.
Motion made by Member Waddick to approve with amendments the April 13, 2017
minutes. Motion seconded by Member Glahn. Motion carried.
V. Special Recognitions And Presentations
A. State of the Infrastructure, Ross Bintner
• Guest Speaker, Ross Bintner, Engineering Services Manager, for the City of Edina.
Mr. Bintner shared a presentation on “State of the Infrastructure.”
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date:
• Mr. Bintner discussed a few key examples of infrastructure such as traffic,
neighborhood reconstruction (street construction project), and transit demand.
• Mr. Bintner also discussed how important to be aware of the replacement year(s)
and the service growth expectations.
B. Electricity Action Plan Quarterly Update, Tara Brown
• Liaison Brown updated Commissioners on the Xcel Energy Quarterly Energy
Conservation Program Participation: 2017 Q1 Summary. Liaison Brown discussed
the overall community goal, which is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 30% by
the year 2025.
• For the Electricity Action Plan, we are mid-way through the 18-month kickoff.
i. For the wind source, we are 60% of the way to our subscription goal, but
only 29% to the average subscription rate. We are looking at a social
media to increase subscribers.
ii. For business, we are at 46% to our goal and planning to host two business
in the fall to continue participation.
iii. The Municipal Facilities goal is currently at 3% of its overall goal. A key
component to the low percentage is that the Asset Management Review
was due July 2016, but was completed in February 2017. For the future,
we are focusing on inefficient energy city building with energy use index
greater than 120, along with the streetlight and facilities operation review.
V. Community Comment
• None.
VI. Reports/ Recommendation
A. Work Plan initiative 5: Electricity Action Plan’s Business Energy Focus Area
a. Commissioner Jackson shared an update from the Business Energy Efficiency Working
Group about two proposed events. One of the proposed event would be at Centennial
Lakes Office park and the goal is to invite other office parks to join and conduct a
building challenge to see which tenants can reduce their office energy use the most.
Commissioner Jackson also discussed the possibility of having a benchmarking ordinance
and looking for a policy to put together soon. Commissioner Jackson believes by having a
benchmarking ordinance, businesses will have a social pressure from other business to
reduce their energy use. Commissioner would like to have an event to invite businesses
who qualify for the benchmarking requirements.
B. Work Plan initiative 6: Comprehensive Plan
a. Chair Manser updated Commissioners about the Comprehensive Plan meetings including
the Big Ideas Workshop held in April 19, and the Board & Commission Workshop
meeting on May 3. The Big Ideas Workshop had a total of eight ideas surrounding
environmental stewardship. One of the main takeaway from the Board & Commission
Workshop meeting was that the environmental component was not a separate piece, but
rather incorporated to all Comprehensive Plan Elements.
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date:
VIII. Correspondence And Petitions
A. Working Group Minutes
• Education & Outreach Work Group
i. Commissioner Satterlee shared an update that the group had their first
film series on April 20th, with 53 people who attended. The next film is
scheduled for May 18th at 7:00pm, located at Edina Senior Center.
Commissioner Satterlee informed the Commissioners that the working
group will need volunteers to table the event.
ii. Commissioner Satterlee confirmed that the, “Edina Home Energy Fair:
Save Energy & Money!” has been officially scheduled for Saturday,
October 7th located at the Braemar Golf Course, Clubhouse.
iii. Commissioner Shanmugavel shared with Commissioners about an
upcoming event called the Youth Summit, which is scheduled for Saturday,
May 20th from 10:00am-2:00pm at Edina High School.
• Water Quality Working Group
i. Commissioner Waddick reminded Commissioners about the Edina Garden Sale
scheduled for May 12th and May 13th at Arneson Acres.
IX. Chair And Member Comments
• Commissioner Waddick reminded Commissioners about the “Workshop: How to
Create a Weather-Resilient Yard,” scheduled for May 24th located at Public Works
Facilities.
X. Staff Comments
A. Updates
• Liaison Brown shared with Commissioners requested updates on:
i. As Mr. Bintner mentioned, he set up field trip for the City of
Infrastructure, so potentially we are looking at cancelling EEC meeting or
rescheduling EEC meeting currently scheduled for August 10, 2017.
1. Liaison Brown will work with Sulekha to send out potential dates
(via doodle) a week before June 8th EEC meeting to reschedule for
August 10, 2017 EEC meeting.
ii. Just to note the work plan is due in September 2017.
iii. Liaison Brown will work with Sulekha to send out potential dates (via
doodle) a week before June 8th EEC meeting to reschedule for August 10,
2017 EEC meeting.
iv. EEC will meet with Council members for the City Council Work Session
which is scheduled for July 18th.
v. Great news! Liaison Brown have submitted two applications for
GreenCorps members, and the City of Edina has been granted for one
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date:
GreenCorp member who will start in September 2017! This individual will
focus on Green Transportation. One of the main goal(s) for this person is
to optimize green fleets.
XI. Adjournment
Motion made by Member Jackson to adjourn the May 11, 2017 meeting at 9:15 p.m. Motion
seconded by Member Glahn. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Sulekha Mohamed
Executive Assistant
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: C .5.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:Ann Kattreh, P arks & R ec reation Directo r
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes : Ed ina P arks & R ecreation C ommission,
May 9, 2017
Info rmatio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Minutes : Parks & Recreation Commis s ion, May 9, 2017
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/13/2017
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Edina Parks & Recreation Commission
Edina City Hall, Council Chambers
Tuesday, May 9, 2017
7 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Chair McCormick called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call were Commissioners Miller, Nelson, Gieseke, Burke, McCormick, Dahlien,
McAwley and Student Commissioner Hulbert.
Commissioner Willett arrived at 7:25 p.m.
Absent were: Commissioners Good, Strother and Student Commissioner Gustafson.
Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus,
Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton, Water Resources Coordinator Jessica Wilson and
Engineering Services Manager Ross Binter
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion made by Dahlien to change the order of the agenda and have the Arden Park Natural
Resource Draft Concept Plan the first item under Reports and Recommendations. Motion
seconded by McAwley. Motion carried.
Motion made by Dahlien to approve the amended agenda. Motion seconded by Gieseke.
Motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion made by Nelson to approve the April 4, 2017 minutes. Motion seconded by Burke.
Motion carried.
V. Community Comment
Art Lowell, 7505 Kellogg, is concerned about the possibility of having soccer fields at Fred Richards
Park.
Dennis Wither, 4504 Sedum Lane, is concerned about the possibility of having two soccer fields and
traffic. He also wanted to challenge the need for two soccer fields.
Stan Davis, 5509 Woodcrest Drive, wanted to discuss the lack of communication from the Parks &
Recreation Department to the city in general with regards to the Arden Park restoration project.
VI. Reports/Recommendations
A. Arden Park Natural Resource Draft Concept Plan
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/13/2017
Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator and Renae Clark, Planner and Project Manager
from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District presented the history of the Arden Park Natural
Resource Concept Plan. They informed the commission they are asking for their feedback and
for a recommendation to the City Council. Also discussed were the community engagement
process and the timeline for the project.
Commissioners asked questions, expressed concerns and gave their feedback.
Motion made by Nelson to recommend the Arden Park Natural Resources Plan to the City Council.
Motion seconded by McAwley. Motion carried.
B. Park Signage Replacement
Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus gave an update on the signage project. She
presented the proposed final design for the park entrance signs and gave details of the signage.
Commissioners asked questions, had discussions and expressed their views.
C. Park Visits
Commissioner McAwley
• Indicated there is a huge dandelion problem in the parks. Staff Liaison Kattreh replied
the city has a Turf Management Plan that they follow that the City Council has approved.
Commissioner Nelson
• Asked if any spraying has been done for the mosquitos and gnats in the parks. Staff
Liaison Kattreh replied that is something that is done by the state.
• Indicated she used the App to let Park Maintenance know there was a problem with a
bench at Todd Park and asked what the expected turnaround time is. Staff Liaison
Kattreh replied the goal would be a day or two.
Commissioner Dahlien
• Asked how the removal of the Braemar Dome went. Staff Liaison Kattreh replied with
their dedicated team this was the smoothest it has ever gone.
VII. City Council Updates, Correspondence and Petitions
A. City Council Updates April 4, April 18 and May 2, 2017
Chair McCormick acknowledged the commission’s receipt of the City Council updates.
B. Correspondence
Chair McCormick acknowledged the commission’s receipt of various correspondences.
C. Petition – Playground at Van Valkenburg Park
Chair McCormick acknowledged the commission’s receipt of the petition with regards to a
playground at Van Valkenburg Park.
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/13/2017
VIII. Chair and Member Comments
Chair McCormick:
• Due to schedule conflicts the retreat will be held during the June meeting
• Location: Pamela Park
• Start time: 5:30pm
• Activities for the meeting will include park tour, dinner, team building activities and
potentially a speaker in addition to discussing ideas for their 2018 work plan
• In preparation for work plan development, commissioners should review the Parks Strategic
Plan
Commissioner Nelson:
• Requested more information on long term funding of projects and playground upgrades
• Liaison Kattreh informed the group that she will be discussing funding issues with Council
Commissioner Dahlien:
• Welcomed the two new commissioners and wished Commissioner Miller a Happy belated
Birthday.
Commissioner Burke, Edina Public Schools Member
• Introduced herself to the commission as Director for Community Education Services
Commissioner Willett
• Introduced himself to the commission.
IX. Staff Comments
Staff Liaison Kattreh and Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus gave the following updates:
• On Thursday, May 11 starting at 5:30 a.m. the MN Department of Agriculture will be treating
a portion of Richfield and Minneapolis for the gypsy moth infestation. They are using the
Edina Aquatic Center parking lot as a staging and take-off and landing area for their
helicopters.
• On May 18 staff and the Parks & Recreation Commission members who are participating in
the Fred Richards master planning process are going to be reviewing the next version of the
Fred Richards concept plan; the next open house is scheduled for Monday, May 22. They
received favorable feedback from the technical evaluation team regarding a potential wetland
bank for the west side of Fred Richards Park. This will give them the ability to move forward
with the next phase in the wetland banking projects.
• Four consultants have been selected to interview for the Braemar Master Plan; HGA, SEH,
SRF and Damon Farber. The interviews will be held on Tuesday, May 23 and the final
selection will go to City Council on June 6.
• There was vandalism at Pamela Park. There is a lighting cabinet that is adjacent to the
artificial turf field that is used to control the lights; however, it no longer controls the lights
Draft Minutes☐
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/13/2017
but it has still been a real problem because people are literally breaking into the cabinet to
try to control the lights. They are in the process of replacing a cabinet again and have
purchased a remote lighting control system so that all of the lights are being controlled over
a network so nothing is being controlled at the field.
• The Aquatic Center has had the filters installed and the zero depth play structure is currently
being installed so it is ready when the pool opens.
• Construction at Braemar Golf Course is well underway on the regulation course. Richard
Mandell will be hosting a kick-off construction meeting on May 16.
• Last Saturday they had a very successful Vehicle Day. Edina partnered with Richfield and
Bloomington and the event was held at Southdale; they had a great turnout.
• This weekend is Race for the Cure that is hosted at Southdale and the race goes around
Rosland Park.
• The hockey boards at Todd Park were taken down this past week.
• The parking lot renovations at Creek Valley are being completed; they are currently adding
the second lift of asphalt so that the parking lot is in great shape.
• The fishing pier and lake fountain are in at Rosland Park.
• This Friday and Saturday is the Annual Plant Sale for the Edina Garden Council at Arneson
Acres. It’s on Friday, May 12 from 10 a.m. – 8 p.m. and Saturday, May 13 from 10 a.m. – 3
p.m. The Garden Council is a non-profit organization that funnels a lot of resources back
into Edina parks.
• The Community Garden opened this past Saturday; all 55 plots are full and there are 12
people on the waiting list.
• There is a softball tournament this weekend at Pamela Park and a baseball tournament at
Courtney Fields.
• May 20 is National Kids to Parks Day; this is a national event put on by the National Park
Trust and this year will be their 7th annual. Overall the purpose is to try to get kids out and
be active. Their motto is active kids are healthy kids. In Edina they are hosting a photo
contest by challenging neighborhoods to take photos and submit them. The neighborhood
that sends in the most photos is going to win and will have their best photo published in the
June edition of Edition Edina as well as the neighborhood will be recognized.
X. Adjournment
Motion made by Gieseke to adjourn the May 9, 2017 meeting at 9:19 p.m. Motion seconded by Dahlien.
Motion carried.
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: C .6.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:Joyc e R ep ya, S enio r P lanner
Item Activity:
Subject:Minutes : Heritage P reservation C o mmis s io n, May 9,
2017
Info rmatio n
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
N one
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Minutes : Heritage Pres ervation Commis s ion, May 9, 2017
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/13/2017
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Heritage Preservation Commission
Edina City Hall
Tuesday, May 9, 2017, at 7:00 p.m.
I. Call To Order
Chair Birdman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call was Chair Birdman and members Moore, Sussman, Kelly, Loving, Blake,
Mondry, and student members Peurzer and Nemerov. Absent was member Nymo. Staff liaison,
Joyce Repya, Senior Planner was also in attendance.
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion was made by Moore and seconded by Kelly to approve the meeting agenda. All
voted aye. The motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion was made by Kelly and seconded by Moore to approve the minutes from the April
17, 2017 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried.
V. Community Comment
Cheryl Dulas, 4609 Bruce Avenue announced that the Country Club Neighborhood for
Preservation committee will conduct their 3rd annual Country Club District walking tour on
Saturday, May 13th. This year, six homes will be highlighted. The tour will begin at 10:00 a.m. with a
starting point in Wooddale Park. A donation of $10 is requested.
VI. Reports/Recommendations
A. Certificate of Appropriateness - 4607 Bruce Avenue
Planner Repya explained that the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) request entails the removal
of an existing 493 sq. ft., 2-car garage to be replaced with a new 583 square foot garage in the
same basically the same location, with access from an existing driveway on the south side of the
property.
Details of the proposed garage include scale and massing consistent with its surroundings and
garages previously approved through the COA process. While the home, classified as American
Colonial Revival, is clad in stucco, the exterior materials proposed for the garage a six inch James
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/13/2017
Hardi lap siding with James Hardi shakes in the gable areas, and aluminum soffit and fascia
boards.
Ms. Repya concluded that Preservation Consultant evaluated the proposed garage and observed
that both the Secretary of the Interior’s standards for rehabilitation and the district plan of
treatment allow for the construction of new detached garages in the Country Club District. The
plan of treatment requires that new garages be compatible with the size, scale, and materials of
the house and surrounding homes. The plans presented with the COA application show a
structure that conforms to these design guidelines. The existing garage is not a historic structure
and the new construction will not require alteration of the historic house. The picturesque
detailing on the replacement garage has no historical precedent but is, in my opinion, compatible
with the architectural character of the house. Thus, Mr. Vogel recommended approval of the COA
with the usual conditions for new garages.
Motion was made by Kelly and seconded by Sussman to approve the Certificate of
Appropriateness for the proposed detached garage, subject to the plans presented and a
year built plaque be installed on the exterior of the structure. All voted aye. The motion
carried.
VII. Correspondence And Petitions
• “How to Think Like Jane Jacobs”, article from the National Trust for Historic Preservation
In recognition of Preservation Month, the article highlights Jane Jacobs theories that influenced
city planning and preservation for decades. Ms. Jacobs, born 101 years ago, advocated for
intricate mingling of different uses in cities, representing a complex and highly developed form of
order.
Planner Repya pointed out that Ms. Jacobs’ ideals are worthy of consideration as the City embarks
on upgrading the Comprehensive Plan.
On a related note, Member Sussman reported that in recognition of Preservation Month,
Preserve Minneapolis will host a documentary film on Jane Jacobs entitled “Citizen Jane - Battle
for the City” at the Lagoon Theater on Friday, May 12th at 7:30 p.m. More information is available
on the Preserve Minneapolis web site.
VIII. Chair And Member Comments
Chair Birdman welcomed new HPC member Rachel Mondry.
Member Blake observed that she attended the Comprehensive Plan information workshop that
was held for board and commission members and heard the Community Development Director
point out that “Change is happening all around in Edina, as evidenced by the numerous changes
made to the 2008 Comp Plan”; and she wondered if the HPC has any say when projects for
Approved Minutes☒
Approved Date: 6/13/2017
change are brought before the City Council. Planner Repya responded that the Comp Plan calls
for Small Area Studies to be conducted for all the commercial nodes in the City, and as a part of
those studies, the HPC provides a report on the history of the area, highlighting significant historic
contexts.
Member Moore provided the following updates from the Edina Historical Society:
• The EHS will be hosting talk by author/storyteller Richard Kronick entitled “The Six Mill
Sites on Minnehaha Creek” on July 12th at 7:00 p.m. at the Minnehaha Grange Hall in Tupa
Park.
• Staff at the EHS just discovered 2 boxes of photos from the 1987 flood occurrence in
Edina. Plans are to post the photos on the Historical Society’s web site.
IX. Staff Comments
Planner Repya reported that the City Council presented the 2017 Heritage Award to Paul Anton
and Nancy Johnson, 5133 Mirror Lakes Drive at the May 2nd meeting. The City will provide a
story about the award on the “Agenda Edina” news show, as well as showcasing the award in
the autumn issue of “About Town”.
X. Adjournment: 7:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Joyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce RepyaJoyce Repya
Date: June 20, 2017 Agenda Item #: XI I I.
To:Mayor and C ity C ounc il Item Type:
O ther
F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk
Item Activity:
Subject:S c hedule of Meetings and Events as of June 20, 2017 Information
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED :
N one
I N TR O D U C TI O N :
F or information only.
AT TAC HME N T S :
Description
Schedule of Meetings & Events as of June 20, 2017
CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF JUNE 20, 2017
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS
Tues June 20 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Work Session Fred Richards Master Plan with Consultants 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues June 27 Special HRA Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Special City Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues July 4 FOURTH OF JULY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed
Tues July 18 HRA Work Session 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Work Session Joint Meeting with Energy & Environment
Commission
6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues Aug 1 Nite to Unite – No City Council Meeting
Wed Aug 2 Work Session 2018-2019 Proposed Budget/Business Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues Aug 15 HRA Work Session 5:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS