Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017 09-13 Planning Commission Meeting Packet
Agenda Planning Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes, Planning Commission, August 30, 2017 V. Special Recognitions And Presentations A. Grandview Green: A Case Study for Lid Development In Minnesota VI. Public Hearings A. Public Hearing: Variance Request, 5401 Blake Road VII. Community Comment During"Community Comment,"the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. Reports/Recommendations A. 2018 Planning Commission Work Plan IX. Correspondence And Petitions X. Chair And Member Comments XI. Staff Comments XII. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an Draft Minutes© Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. �p1��ll Minutes o~ e if City Of Edina, Minnesota o Planning Commission Ngo �. gay Edina City Hall Council Chambers "rlll «'c' August 30 2017, 7:00 P.M. I.Y Y I. Call To Order Vice-Chair Nemerov called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Commissioners Hobbs, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Acting Chair Nemerov Student Members,Jones. Staff, City Planner, Teague, Assistant Planner, Aaker, Sr. Communications Coord., Eidsness, Support Staff, Hoogenakker Absent from the roll: Olsen and Kivimaki III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the August 30 2017, meeting agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the minutes of the August 16, 2017, Planning Commission meeting, The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Commissioner Lee requested changes to the minutes. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Public Hearings A. Variance. 4505 Nancy Lane, Edina, MN. Setback Variance from Pond Staff Presentation Planner Aaker reported that the subject property is located on the south side of Nancy Lane cul-de-sac consisting of a two story home with an attached two car garage. The property backs up to a ponding area. The property was converted in 2015 from a rambler to a two story home. The property is nonconforming regarding setback and required variances to convert the existing rambler into a two story home, The footprint of the home is larger than the buildable area given the required setbacks for the property. The most impinging setback on the property is the 50-foot setback required form the water body. The water body setback is within the footprint area, Page 1 of 9 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. so no improvements into the rear yard can be accomplished without a variance. The homeowner would like to construct a deck from of the main floor of the home with stairs down to access the rear yard. The deck will be 281 square feet and will be located behind the garage, which is the farthest part of the home from the pond area. Given the maximum allowable lot coverage requirements, some of the existing patio area will be remove in order to accomplish the proposed deck. The homeowner had originally submitted plans for a larger deck however; it was scaled back given the maximum coverage limits. The property will be at the maximum allowable lot coverage with the proposed deck. No additional improvements may be accomplishes On-site given coverage requirements. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of the variance based on the following findings: I. The proposed location of the deck is reasonable given the limitations of the site. It would be located farther from the pond than the existing home. 2. The property received variances in 2015 to convert a rambler into a two-story home given the setbacks required and existing nonconforming conditions. Conditions and setbacks remain the same with no opportunity to add anything into the rear yard, (where typically a home owner would expect to be able to add onto a property). 3. The practical difficulty for the property is restrictive setbacks and nonconforming nature of the structure. 4. The proposed deck will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The proposed deck expansion will be above grade and will maintain a greater setback from the pond than the back corner of the house. Approval shall also be subject to the following conditions: Plans and survey dated stamped: August I, 2017. Appearing for the Applicant Mark Seaberg, applicant and property owner. Applicant Presentation Mr. Seaberg addressed the Commission and explained their intent was to construct a deck with stairs to access the rear yard from the house. Comments/Questions Planner Aaker was asked when staff reviews plans does staff differentiate between a deck and addition. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative. She noted a deck is not a solid structure and is usually constructed on posts, allowing flow. She added building solid living space off the rear of the home would raise different concerns. Page 2 of 9 Draft Minutes© • Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. It was noted that the property received a variance to construct the new house and at that time plans indicated a window not a door on the rear elevation. Changing the window to a door created the need for a variance allowing access the rear yard. Planner Aaker agreed that the original plans did indicate a window not door. Chair Aaker was asked if a deck requires a storm water management plan. It was pointed out that erosion could be an issue. Planner Aaker responded that the deck did not necessitate a storm water management plan; however, that is something that could be discussed in the future. Commissioners agreed that protecting waterbodies and structures located close to waterbodies is important. A discussion ensued with the majority of Commissioners agreeing that the variance request was reasonable and that they could support it. It was acknowledged that the applicant was aware of the restraints for this lot due to the water; however, it was pointed out the majority of homes on this pond have decks and are non-conforming. Public Hearing David Melander 4443 Garrison Lane, addressed the Commission stating his support for the variance and the fact that many homes along this waterbody are non-conforming and have decks. He said in his opinion there should be no problem with approving this deck. Vice-chair Nemerov asked if anyone else would like to speak to the issue. Being none; a motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to close the public hearing. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lee. All voted aye. The motion carried. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the variance as submitted based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. Ayes, Hobbs, Strauss, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Nemerov. Nays, Lee, Thorsen. The motion carried. B. Variance. 7710 March Court, Edina, MN -Withdrew VI. Community Comment Vice-Chair Nemerov asked if anyone would like to speak during public comment. No one spoke. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close Community Comment. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. Community Comment closed. Page 3 of 9 Draft Minutes© Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. VII. Reports/Recommendations Acting-chair Nemerov explained that the Sketch Plan process provides an applicant a venue to receive nonbinding comments from the Commission and City Council. Nemerov stated this is not a public hearing; however, if an applicant proceeds with a formal application public comments will be taken. A. Sketch Plan Review—Shake Shack (NW Corner Southdale Center) Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to develop the southeast corner of France Avenue & 66th Street, at Southdale. This is the last of the four corners of the Southdale site to be developed. The site is currently a paved overflow parking for the mall and Macy's. Simon Properties is proposing to construct a 5,000 square foot Shake Shack stand-alone restaurant. No drive-through is proposed. The store would have a pedestrian entrance off France Avenue, and from the parking lot facing east. Teague added that the site is zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District. The proposed use is permitted on the site. The applicant would only be requesting a site plan review with a parking stall variance. These variances have been standard practice for development on the Southdale site over the past 15 years. The City does not have a lot of discretion when reviewing this project as it is a permitted use. The applicant is still however, requesting Sketch Plan feedback on their plans prior to submittal of a formal application. Teague concluded that a traffic study would be required to determine the impacts on adjacent roadways. The study should include an analysis of intersections, the ring road and access to the site. Appearing for the Applicant Clif Poynter with Simon Properties Discussion/Comments Commissioners provided the following comments on the Shake Shack Sketch Plan. • Planner Teague was asked if the signage for the proposed restaurant meets code. Planner Teague responded that signage has not been reviewed; however, all signage would be required to meet ordinance requirements. • Teague was asked who was responsible for the sidewalks and access. Teague responded he believes the developer is responsible for the sidewalks. Page 4 of 9 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. • Commissioners asked Planner Teague to explain parking for the Shake Shack and the reason a variance is needed. Teague explained that parking is based on the entire Southdale campus, not the individual site. Teague noted that at present Southdale is considered "under parked" thereby any new construction would require a parking variance. Teague further noted that building the restaurant also removes parking spaces. Applicant Presentation Mr. Poynter addressed the Commission and reported that Simon is happy and excited about Shake Shack joining our campus. Poynter said Southdale Center is pleased with the continued redevelopment of its corners. Continuing, Poynter explained the current development plan includes the new 5,000 + square foot Shake Shack restaurant, reconstruction of the surface parking lot, new sidewalk connections from the public right of way to the mall and reconfiguration of nearby intersections along with the mall ring road. Poynter said they believe the architecture of the proposed restaurant and the outdoor space is vibrant and interesting, including large windows in the restaurant to engage the public. Poynter told the Commission they are very open to increasing the landscaping and with regard to parking they are very comfortable with the parking provided on the site. Concluding, Poynter said Simon also believes this redevelopment addresses the objectives and vision of the Southdale Area District and benefits the residents and visitors to the City of Edina. Graphics of the project were shared with the Commission. Discussion/Comments Commissioners raised the following: • A question was raised on the redevelopment of this corner pointing out the redevelopment is less dense than previous corner redevelopments. Poytner responded Southdale Center has a vision for their campus, adding they believe this is the highest and best use for this site. Poytner further explained that this corner is subject to visual restraints, reiterating they believe the use as proposed is good. • It was suggested that more green space should be added to the site. Poytner reiterated they are agreeable to adding more landscaping; however, they are also trying to engage the corner and create a gathering space. He also noted that the elevation also presents some challenges. A discussion ensued with some Commissioners questioning if the proposed use was the highest and best use for this site. Commissioners expressed surprise at the "view permission" stipulation in some of the anchor tenant leases. Commissioners indicated their belief that this corner is very valuable and high profile and while they understand Simon supports this plan it may not be the best use of the site.An opinion was also expressed that the corners do not relate well and the color pallet was not pleasing. Concluding, Commissioners said if this proceeds to formal application careful study needs to occur to ensure pedestrian safety and that the redevelopment does not negatively affect ring road circulation. Commissioners also expressed the opinion that parking probably would not be a problem. Page 5 of 9 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Vice-chair Nemerov thanked the applicants for their time. B. Sketch Plan Review. Crossroads (7200 & 7250 France Avenue) Staff Presentation Planner Teague reported that the Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to re-develop 5.2 acres of land west of France between 72nd Street West and Gallagher Drive. As proposed, at full build out, the site would include: ➢ 266-334 new housing units (51-64 units per acre); 3-6 stories at 7200 France and 14 stories at 7250 France. Phase I = 121-164 units (rental apartments); Phase 2= 145-170 units (owner occupied condominiums or rental apartments.) ➢ A bike and pedestrian trail is proposed through the site including a launch/landing pad for a bike/pedestrian connection over France Avenue. The applicant does NOT propose to build the bridge over France. This could be a part of the Three Rivers Park Regional Trail. The plans have been sent to Three Rivers Park for comment. The District has found that the plans would not meet their specifications for the Regional Trail. ➢ The applicant is proposing to comply with the City's Affordable Housing Policy including providing 20% of the total units within the project. (Up to 67 units.) Teague explained that to accommodate the request the following is required: ➢ Comprehensive Plan Amendments to increase the height maximum from four stories and 48 feet to 14 stories and 180 feet; and increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 64 units per acre; and increase in FAR from 1.5 to 1.6; and ➢ A Rezoning from POD-I, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Teague concluded as with all sketch plan reviews; the Planning Commission is asked to provide non-binding comments and direction on a potential future development request. Areas of focus should be on the proposed land use, the appropriateness of the proposed development on this site, with a focus on the proposed density and building height. Appearing for the Applicant Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects and Jamie Stolpestad Discussion/Comments Commissioners raised the following: Page 6 of 9 Draft Minutes© ` Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. • Planner Teague was asked the perimeters of the POD-I Zoning District. Teague responded that POD-I is primarily office use with limited retail. • Teague was asked if the "crossover" was part of the project. Teague told the Commission the "crossover" was not part of the project. • Teague was asked if all parking was accommodated underground. Teague responded that for the most part parking would be underground. • Teague was asked how this proposal ties in with the timing of the Greater Southdale Small Area Plan. Teague said he believes a contract for a consultant for the plan is being negotiated and should be completed in September. Teague was asked if the west side of France Avenue was included in the Southdale Small Area Plan. Teague responded in the affirmative. Applicant Presentation Mr. Stolpestad addressed the Commission and explained the subject site is a complicated site; however, the timing is right to present to the community a different option in living that provides a different quality of life. He added this development would tie into the regional bike trails and is perfect for commuters, pedestrians and bike enthusiasts. Stolpestad introduced Dean Dovoslis to speak to elements of the project. Dean Dovolis explained this project was designed keeping in mind the France Avenue Working Principles and Supporting Questions. With graphics, Dovolis highlighted aspects of the project as follows: • The Subject Site(s) is a two-site parcel on the west side of France Avenue at Gallagher Drive that will be broken up into smaller areas. • 7200 France is 3.51 acres and is proposed to be redevelopment into a 3 to 6 story, 121 to 16I housing units. A two level wellness center is also proposed. • 7250 France Avenue is 1.68 acres and the proposed redevelopment include a 14-story building with residential over retail. The residential component is approximately 140-170 units plus retail. • A key feature of the project is a bike/pedestrian bridge over France Avenue connecting the subject site to the East of France. This feature provides the missing link to complete the Nine Mile Creek Bike trail. Mt. Dovolis introduced Mr. Aaron Johnson, project manager to speak to the Commission. Johnson addressed the Commission and explained the importance of this project provides the homeowners with the opportunity to participate in active forms of transportation. Johnson delivered a power point presentation. Discussion/comments • Staff and/or developer was asked the cost of the proposed bridge over France Avenue and who would pay for it. Dovolis responded that the cost would depend on the style and architecture of the bridge. He said he believes a "plain" bridge could cost roughly 2-million dollars; a "designed" Page 7 of 9 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. bridge would cost around 3-million. Dovolis added they envision the bridge as both pedestrian and bike, adding who pays for the bridge is under discussion. • It was suggested that for the 7200 building that attention should be paid to access to grade and to better articulate the building mass to lessen the scale. • Commissioners expressed their approval that the project reflects a commitment to sustainability. It was suggested that the applicant be dramatic in their approach to sustainability. Dovolis told Commissioners sustainability is important and they will make a conscious effort to bring it to the forefront. Dovolis added they are also doing soil studies and believe if it is sand, that they can purify their own water. • It was suggested more green space needs to be added throughout the site. Consider green roofs. Activate the sidewalks and work on making the internal site more attractive. • Make sure that the scale of the project is right and enhances the quality of the site. • With regard to building height placing the height on France Avenue is best; however look at building mass and finding ways to provide open glimpses throughout the site. Tree placement will be critical to ensure visibility throughout the side. • Commissioners stressed that the hardest piece of this project is building height. Look at unique architecture to offset height. • Commissioners also pointed out how important neighborhood outreach is and every effort should be made to keep the neighborhood informed. Dovolis responded that they would continue holding neighborhood meetings. • Look at the site from the residents view (Bristol neighborhood) and get that right, again it is important that the site appears open, less dense, reduce massing. • Provide shadow studies. • It was suggested that if a formal application is made they provide a "walk through" or"fly-over" element in the presentation. • The development team was asked to explain what the "wellness center" is comprised of. In response, the team explained that they envision the "wellness center" to be an area that focuses on individual health and well-being. It would not be a fitness center. It is envisioned that a spa would be included in this area and physician offices (eye, etc.). • Commissioners stated they were encouraged by the affordability component. The discussion continued with Commissioners agreeing that the proposal is interesting; however, without more defined plans it is difficult to form a complete opinion. Commissioners agreed that the location chosen for the tallest building was best. A traffic study also needs to be completed before a decision is made. Commissioners reiterated the importance of green space on the site, walkability of the site and massing. The Commission also said at the time of formal application the development team should know more about the bridge and the sites connection to bike and walking trails. Concluding, Commissioners stressed the issue of building height. Vice-chair Nemerov thanked the applicants for their presentation. VIII. Correspondence and Petitions Page 8 of 9 Draft MinutesN Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date:Click here to enter a date. Vice-Chair Nemerov acknowledged back of packet materials. IX. Chair and Member Comments None. X. Staff Comments Planner Teague reported that study for the "Lid" continues, adding there will be meetings in early September on the "Lid". XI. Adjournment Commissioner Thorsen moved to adjourn the meeting of the Planning Commission at 9:50 p.m. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. jaclzie H-oogee Respectfully submitted • Page 9 of 9 STAFF REPORT ,,c5c1 A, ra vAh_ o .� 1888 Date: September 8, 2017 To: PLANNING COMMISSION From: Emily Bodeker,Assistant City Planner Subject: B-17-17, A 3.I foot first floor elevation variance request for a new home located at 5401 Blake Road/6105 Pine Grove Road Information / Background: JMS Custom homes has submitted a variance application to increase the first floor elevation of a new home 4.1 feet higher than the current first floor elevation. A demolition permit for the house that existed at 5401 Blake Road was pulled in December 2012 and the subject property sits vacant today. Before the house was demolished, the existing house was oriented to the west towards Blake Road.The proposed house will be oriented to the north, and be addressed off of Pine Grove Road. The existing basement elevation of the home is at 942.6. The proposed first floor elevation is 946.7. The zoning ordinance allows for a maximum I foot increase in height of an existing first floor. The applicant is asking for a 3.I foot variance to increase the first floor height by 4.I feet. Eligibility Requirements for Variances from the I foot maximum increase in I St floor height City Code allows for the issuance of a variance to increase the first floor elevation of a new home over one foot above the existing home under one of the following circumstances: I) To elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the 100-year flood elevation, as established by FEMA; 2) To elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to protect from groundwater intrusion; 3) To elevate the first floor elevation to the extent necessary to meet the state building code, city code, or statutory requirements; Furthermore, a variance may only be issued if the proposed project fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 STAFF REPORT Page 2 The home that was demolished on this property was a two-story home oriented towards Blake Road. The elevation of the previously existing driveway off of Blake Road was 940.3 feet. The elevation of the driveway off of Pine Grove Road is 943.6 feet. The applicant is requesting to raise the proposed house 4.I feet due to the existing grade elevations. The existing elevation of where the home/garage would sit is lower than the driveway elevation off of Pine Grove Road, therefore the applicant is asking for the variance to raise the house. The applicant is choosing to orient the house off of Pine Grove Road versus Blake Road due to Blake Road being a busier street. Blake Road is classified as a collector street and Pine Grove is classified as a local street. The Comprehensive Plan identifies that mobility and land access are equally important on collector streets, but advises that direct land access should predominately be to developed concentrations. Arterial streets generally have limited access, collectors allow a greater degree of access given their combined mobility/access function, and local streets allow the most access of the roadway functional categories. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The existing 18,221 square foot lot is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Pine Grove Road and Blake Road. A demolition permit for the two-story home that existed on site was issued in December of 2012. The lot has been vacant since the demolition of the existing home. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-I, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The grading must not impact adjacent neighbors. The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments as attached in a memorandum. i ` I STAFF REPORT ���A' 1� -41c4);( • ' )tl.' cn v..,,, jo sm J 0., .......... Neoi„.,,p5ss• 1888 Date: September 8, 2017 To: PLANNING COMMISSION From: Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner Subject: B-17-17, A 3.I foot first floor elevation variance request for a new home located at 5401 Blake Road/6105 Pine Grove Road Information / Background: JMS Custom homes has submitted a variance application to increase the first floor elevation of a new home 4.I feet higher than the current first floor elevation. A demolition permit for the house that existed at 5401 Blake Road was pulled in December 2012 and the subject property sits vacant today. Before the house was demolished, the existing house was oriented to the west towards Blake Road. The proposed house will be oriented to the north, and be addressed off of Pine Grove Road. The existing basement elevation of the home is at 942.6. The proposed first floor elevation is 946.7. The zoning ordinance allows for a maximum I foot increase in height of an existing first floor. The applicant is asking for a 3.I foot variance to increase the first floor height by 4.I feet. Eligibility Requirements for Variances from the I foot maximum increase in 1st floor height City Code allows for the issuance of a variance to increase the first floor elevation of a new home over one foot above the existing home under one of the following circumstances: I) To elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two feet above the 100-year flood elevation, as established by FEMA; 2) To elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to protect from groundwater intrusion; 3) To elevate the first floor elevation to the extent necessary to meet the state building code, city code, or statutory requirements; Furthermore, a variance may only be issued if the proposed project fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 STAFF REPORT Page 2 The home that was demolished on this property was a two-story home oriented towards Blake Road. The elevation of the previously existing driveway off of Blake Road was 940.3 feet.The elevation of the driveway off of Pine Grove Road is 943.6 feet. The applicant is requesting to raise the proposed house 4.I feet due to the existing grade elevations. The existing elevation of where the home/garage would sit is lower than the driveway elevation off of Pine Grove Road, therefore the applicant is asking for the variance to raise the house. The applicant is choosing to orient the house off of Pine Grove Road versus Blake Road due to Blake Road being a busier street. Blake Road is classified as a collector street and Pine Grove is classified as a local street. The Comprehensive Plan identifies that mobility and land access are equally important on collector streets, but advises that direct land access should predominately be to developed concentrations. Arterial streets generally have limited access, collectors allow a greater degree of access given their combined mobility/access function, and local streets allow the most access of the roadway functional categories. Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Easterly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Southerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Westerly: Single Unit residential homes; zoned and guided low-density residential. Existing Site Features The existing 18,221 square foot lot is located on the southeast corner of the intersection of Pine Grove Road and Blake Road. A demolition permit for the two-story home that existed on site was issued in December of 2012. The lot has been vacant since the demolition of the existing home. Planning Guide Plan designation: Low-Density Residential Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling District Grading & Drainage The grading must not impact adjacent neighbors. The Environmental Engineer has reviewed the application and submitted comments as attached in a memorandum. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Compliance Table City Standard Proposed North Side— 20/15 feet 31.3 feet East Side - 25 feet 47.I feet South— 25 feet principal structure 26.6 5 feet decks/patios 14.4 West Side— 33.2 feet 33.2 feet Building Coverage 25% 19.4% 1st Floor Elevation I foot/942.6-943.6 4.1 feet/946.7* Building Height 37.5 feet 32.67 feet *Requires a variance PRIMARY ISSUES & STAFF RECOMENDATION Primary Issues • Does the proposed new home meet the criteria for approval of a variance with a first floor elevation 4.1 feet higher than the existing home? Staff believes the proposal meets the criteria for a variance to allow the first floor elevation 4.I feet higher than the existing home for the following four reasons: I) The proposed home elevates the first floor elevation above the driveway elevation to provide drainage away from the home. 2) The proposed home elevates the first floor elevation to the extent necessary to meet the building code with regard to minimum ceiling height. 3) The proposed home design fits the character of the neighborhood in height, scale, and mass; 4) The request meets the criteria for approval of a variance given the following findings: a. The proposal meets the conditions for variance. b. The proposal meets all other applicable Zoning Ordinance requirements. c. The proposal fits the character with this neighborhood. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Recommended Action: Approve a 3.1 foot 1st floor height variance to allow the construction of a new home that will be more than one foot (4.I feet total) above the existing first floor elevation of the previous home located at 5401 Blake Road. Staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: Survey date stamped August II, 2017. Elevations and building plans date stamped August I I, 2017 Revised site plan with city comments dated August 31, 2017. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer's memo. Deadline for a city decision: October 9, 2017. r��rp r i ° - DATE: September 7, 2017 TO: Cary Teague— Planning Director FROM: Charles Gerk PE—Graduate Engineer RE: 5401 Pine Grove Rd- Variance Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for street and utility concerns, grading, storm water, erosion and sediment control and for general adherence to the relevant ordinance sections. This review was performed at the request of the Planning Department; a more detailed review will be performed at the time of building permit application. Plans reviewed include the site plan dated 8/31/17 and the storm water management plan dated 08/04/17. Summary of Review The proposed plans include lot grading and construction of a new home at 5401 Pine Grove Rd (Blake Rd). Engineering has no concerns with the plans as proposed. Grading and Drainage Grading of the site includes flattening of the lot and some minor areas of regrading of drainage from the rear of the property to Pine Grove Rd. Preliminary stormwater calculations show no net increase in peak rate or volume to neighboring private properties, however a more thorough report will be required at building permit. Erosion and Sediment Control Perimeter control is required, and will be required for a building permit. Inlet protection is also required. Street and Curb Cut A curb cut permit will be required prior to construction of the driveway. Water and Sanitary Utilities No Comments Other Items A Nine Mile Creek Watershed District erosion and sediment control permit will be required at building permit. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 CITY OF EDINA MEMO w o. 9IN��l�`� O 1 Date: September 8, 2017 i7 b �`•O To: Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner From: David Fisher, Chief Building Official Re: 5401 Blake Rd S New Home Variance for floor height • The 2015 MN State Building Code Section R305 Ceiling Height in new buildings requires a minimum height of 7 feet measured from the finished floor to the lowest projection from the ceiling in habitable spaces. In the most common ceiling heights in the basement are 8 feet and sometime 9 and 10 feet. • The grades on this property may require this variance to provide the drainage needed away from the foundation of the new location of the home. City of Edina • 4801 W.50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Ø. . , ? : .. HOMESTEAD PARTNERS August 7,2017 •Ms.KrISAaker ' Assistant City planner City of Edina 4801W.50tk5t-, Edina,MN:55424 RE; 'Variance Request for 5401 Blake Road.(future Address:6100 Pine Grove Road) Pear Ms.Aalcer, Please find attached the following information as part of the Variance Request package: 1. Executed Variance Applicqtlpn(6 pages). 2. VarianCe Check Pee in the amount of$450. 3. Hennepin County Property Map—JMS Custom Homes, LLC{illustrating ownership), 4, pine.Grove•Rcikl WI Pictiret'(15 paget). 5,. 9 Mile Creek letter dated May 1, 2017, approving NMCWD Permit 2017-58 Home Construction(4 page* 6., Existing Conditions Survey dated 9/12112,illustrating the previous home loCatiOn. 7, Proposed New Survey/Variance Exhibit dated 8/4/17, illustrating new proposed home location. 8 Proposed liaise Plans dated 7/31/17 last reviision date(18 pages): 9, Perspective ixowitigs dated 8/4/17, illustrating the previous existing and proposed conditions;including the adjacent homes(3 pages). 10,Previous Existing and.Proposed Stormwater Calculations dated 8/4/17 (2 PageS), 11,5torrnwater.Management man (construction)and Details dated 8/4/.17(2 pages). Project DeitrIntiori- W$ OiStOM. Homes, itproposing to construct a new single family borne at 5401 Blake Road, Edina (Note:More address 63.06 Pine Grove Road).•Currently,the•property it Vacant with an existing curbtiit Off Of Pine Grove Road.The previ&A hale fated west and the main driveway access was off Of Blake Road and .a secondary driveway access from Pine Grove Roacl. The proposed new home Will face north and the main access will be off of Pine Grove Road This allows a safer driveway egress arid ingress vs the previous driveway access location from Blake Rbad, Tho proposed home is guided to he one of our 2018 Spring Preview Parade Homes i The new home is a 2 level with a total of 5,475 square feet (including the basement square foqtage), 1-jornOtteod PartnOrstt.0 I 035 Culligan Way Minnetonka,MN 55343I 952-9494630 Kris:Aateer August 7,2017 page.:2 As illustrated the lot area is 14,01 square feet,All the,proposed building setbacks are met.per the Ri Zoning biStric.tf This includes the driveway access distance from the corner of Pine Grove and Blake Roads, per disposiOns withCharlie 0.erk, Engineering Department. The proposed 5.4.rvPY'reflect5'hi5reque5ted.change to flip the neck of thedrlyewav,.. JMSCustom Homes is requesting a variance from Section Special Requirements, item (8)a c. d.,which states:AdditiOns to, or replacement of, single'dwelling unit buildings With first floor elevation of more than one foot above the.existing first floor elevation of theektStiOg dWellingUnit building require a variance... As to the specific items referenced in SeCtion (8),e: 1):. ci and d., below:are the reasonableness :and unique circumstances of this variance request. a. Not APOttc@bleP.19POY••••1$not 54 flood b. Yes. The street elevation at the old driveway from Blake Road (0404) is about O.feet lower than the new.driVeweV off of Pine .Grove Road proposed. • .110.0§0 will sit higher than above the existing floor elevation due to the existing grade elevations ..constraints on this lot. The existing grade elevations are lower in the proposed location Of the home / garage than the existing grade elevationalong Pine Grove Road.The storm Weter. must drain ewey from the proposed hoh-5e 1 garage (floor elevation 945)to the existing street of Pine Grove Road (street elevation of 04$40: Due to the surrounding setback regkiirements the proposed'driveway length is tt, with minimal:slope elevation to the Pine Grove Roadof•••20f.;x3: further Illustrated..,4y,the proposed survey,the-propetty characteristics are unique due to the topography from .east to west and slopes itioWnwterd to the south. Grove Road the ciirb. line#10fatiOnis fairly the same drops 1'. However,the elevation along.131ake,Road freiri north to south drops The attached pictures illustrate the existing•topography Constraints on this propertyhaving the proposed access off of the Rove 11004 provides an ingress and egress that is much.safer to the public vs the old access off of • Blake Road. Notet the City eliminated the aid direct access from Blake Road when it was reconstructed. Please see the :OttOehed iproposed house plans.. The required and construction methods have changed over time, since this section of',ordinance has been adopted, such JOIst.CPP*P0PD"VAI..!from'-c4r1.1..,, d, Yes. The 'proposed benne will fit in the character of .the n00: )01,09,0, 'The existing • AtitOtindihg,neighborhood contains one and two level'homes:The uniqueness of this 00101/411000is that it bffets‘.:e•Wiao:range.of home styleS eh&.6holtet that consumers can choose from,.In the market piece the 2 story home b•niost-.4eAreitto raise a family. The proposed home will 0.0t.excgod the.t..1:e1ght requirement the proposed height. . . . . . . . M . Kris Aaker August 7,2017 Page:3 is 32', The proposed home will provide a neighborhood sense of entry into the immediate area with existing one and two,level homes that are decades in age to new homes that have been recently built within the last 2 years. In addition, to the home styles in this,neighborhood.area,the maturity Of the tree§that surround this corner lot will provide natural look that Would be complimentary tb the proposed tiVO level home. Therefore, the reasOriablenetsand unique circumstance of our Variance request is in a reasonable matinerthat Will riot alter the character in the immediate area/neighborhood. Thank you for this opportunity to illustrate to the City that our Variance request will be in character of the neighborhood and is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the City Ordinances, JMS Custom Homes has Wilt many homes in the Edina over the years that have proVided great benefits to the.community. Warm:Regards, Tom Bakritges Oirectbr of Land Development CC: Mike swanson,VP"of construction and Operations Tim Brown,VP and Director of Finance Gary Eidson,Attorney at Law-Fahyansice,Westra, Hart&Thomson • • Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 7/26/2017 , ,,,,..:,,,,...,,, „, ,,,..., t E; �- Y r r c r ' 4 4 � :,.111.7": ettsda,� 4 � �'ni-r7_, - toe.,„0,:... . _ f " , 1. . } .�"..'w r A 4r 4 M skt` d I41 , kt }. f' ,,,,,t..,..,,,,:,, .$ "`g x I w tr ,oet , : ,.: * 9. , Atito. op "''4444 r ---_,,,,:„.,22,-.., . — j i. • ,f y,.� _ +l i r k .._._ _ n t ' ° ' 1, r fi; , -.� i1 iliiiit, `�'+...- b.. �l 'h d 't11 o 1, #. _ }!, ^ lt w'- . . , ..._ . .. . k 1 inch = 100 feet PARCEL ID: 3211721220037 Comments: OWNER NAME: Jms Custom Homes Llc PARCEL ADDRESS: 5401 Blake Rd S, Edina MN 55436 PARCEL AREA: 0.42 acres, 18,267 sq ft A-T-B:Abstract SALE PRICE: $362,167 SALE DATA:09/2012 SALE CODE: Excluded From Ratio Studies This data(i)is furnished'ASIS'with no representation as toi completeness or o ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no PROPERTY TYPE:Vacant Land-Residential warranty ofany kind;and(iii)is ng purpobse for legal,engineering or surveying pue rposes, HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead Hennepin County shall not beliable forany MARKET VALUE: $327,700 damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. TAX TOTAL: $5,656,48 COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN ASSESSED 2017, PAYABLE 2018COUNTY 2017 PROPERTY TYPE:Vacant Land-residential HOMESTEAD: Non-homestead MARKET VALUE: $344,000 • Item Coversheet Page 1 of 1 CITY OF EDINA (rp4A,./Tht-, 4801 West 50th Street tn Edina, MN 55424w c7 •��zrHtrcxt�2� ww .edinamn.gov 18811 Date: September 13, 2017 To: Planning Commission From: Katie Clark Sieben, Economic Development Project Consultant Subject: Grandview Green: A Case Study for Lid Development In Minnesota ACTION REQUESTED: No Action Requested INTRODUCTION: See attached PowerPoint. ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation PDF of PowerPoint https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaWeb/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=3523 9/5/2017 1 c a) CC3 u) 0 -1--, o CN -5 EL H Z _ --C) 0 C ELif N 0 -u)-- a) • .(I) /.,S......"--.V a /4(a 0 S 0- ,-•'. 03 • y E CD E +-..............,r,• C 01- #) -.. '• C 5- H all U_ — (1) 0 < [.. E 0 0 •_ cli co o 43.) > • • a) , C 0 , CU -0 a) •.. 0 ik....... 1---- L,. _, (q .,i,i , ...--- :., 111) r--=> ( ).) r,----) L.\\,--•.)) , -', (4:-' ----,,- N ( -'C O r—I-1 Z F--1 F.-4 U H W q0 Asi_k 4 ) U U �O s_ i c if) 0 a) �' CO N L..) i.: 0s _ — � V) 040 Qu c 4a,. .=. rd t o VI al V �m ' O > -' N .� � U U 1 I- X o C 1 9 Tu.— ,b- Lt.L. Q ce a t O -+ ZQ E. -_: O `n )c.--3 .....i ,--- c N Q 01 cu u //* M ri I `A >,. ..3.). 2 4-+ R . 4-ki -14 2 `f O A,NA- -0 c 01 73 a) a) ro c Q) c v) _ O, £ •— a) c's o u +- C C Q 01 N a) E •E o c a E cu v) - p 0 MS > e• O Q. E O N = N 1 VW (1 C SC t it5) 0 fj; C)1--- 1--->. .ril .2 =.-7 3 V O O s `i' _CV 2) I ON -0 a) pCO in O ri C c -C a) u aw •—, = Q v 0 C 4-° 7 tA ." C U ' O pa) 4-- 4-- c� a) > v oC a. u O O s = L S a) £ O a) oC o 0 E_ 0 0 W V V') A. ® p da E ..1"1 Z t. i 1 4 ill) r...: t-,( , .. ..*. -,. . - :-.', ' . ' .0* . C 0 *4--; oma, X X Q C G SL as 1- cu 0- al L 4J Vii) c CU X X X X v L• Q . E I 4-# o O E °- X X -i o U oo a> ; ✓ � QCU Win U -0 rd o o o O > t > >, 0_ • u X X -o Ct , .2 o Q Z U N N CN O cd 4- a v, - V rd cct E O c Li `^ rcs Q Q CD w rci U till c Cii a. v N Z u v,rts .. of ,„ £ u N 0- C +� O O N D O Q = � O O1 v O QJ Tv- cd cd = d i • •i > N N 4-• 4J ee 5 ,_, W U1....„..., .0 00 Li— col cid rcS; m _ : = J 2 < lO N m J u r1 Z Z.') .,IL.,\I '')W :mfR. !t ,r //,/,.... ...,........;:i. - - T-A* ..4PP:', . ;.-* ''''''(a al \, ,,,, . ,N. ,,‘,..,. 't. ,L,A,:tv„.„:.,:(,•40 „, ,•,41t,s q0 AAA''' ,}x t l i {` a) QJ — S S -0 A a' I.- til ut O al l ate$ Q) ad a) ate �J CS) '� in a) .„ E 0 •NVr� Q a) O a C Sim to O 'er - s > E rd 61 Uj C a N a-+ U I vi U0 �, r - a) c a) � � a) •Ems -0 E z +-, 0- o (3) al : +J a) S. -O E ' v O u > O c c 41111 in c U • a) C '- 4-, _0 N > s) O v 0 E t d . .„ UCL) lA N U a) a- IA Q) CICS U a) U (d +� U E S cu I. cd N a� (� N > (71 > > • i (1) O M U C • .I N > ,1-0 a) O 0 •'v -0 U +-' Q o-0) C vs � �, v C 0 0 C cd N u 0 u a) ca t } •- v,`^ C O u a) c0 Crt O a C 0 u tit I E 4-, '-- C 1. CL OIvo �• � >pa) > 04 > a, C till QNss � Uaa, a, }' 0, ,4- o r� +, + v, v, a) 0 O >•• N a) E _a � �' la) .'4._) c °' cu 0 w cu rzSN 'a) a o >, C `) > s 1-: o OU a) C rd U .— u cd -a J u Q o 0 N CI _ _ _ „,... D , t• , • • to I ., i —1 t *0 i W CD ,. ', , • '4. , ”k, V , c ..., . "lb . • 0 /77-.71 ‘..../ . . . ... 746 1 I '....,ii..... ., 0 . . - , , e' I ,,, . , .. ......,,....... . r k ,,. ' , ...... ,. ,74 ,..,...., ,.. . . ,. 4-• .. . .. ........ • , .... -... 4 . ... , . . . - .'il'14001.• , ... , . ' ,...;,,,,,* :.,,i. ,,,,...,,,. - , . ,'i--.-...4 ' IVIRWI/r — ....,....,,,,,......„....... . . ..., . ., — losoo 0 ' \.....- —...—.,..... .....'— ...a.... ...,..,, ... . ........ 7 . . . , . nt. 11.., , ,,_. . ... ..,:.._!IV.-.--- ' t. •,s4.— ' . ,... , ..,,,,,..,..„............. 4-i ./ 1,;:,...-. .0 r•-' ..---1, - — „: ', ,..,...., - I. * ' •--, t',,f, 7 ,,• , 1,i i'7 : ..' 'air . . 1 0'..,r f , .o• , , , .. ., . a.„.. vr-••`:. - '''::ft •,45' ' fr • *'' ,• Cli— ',.:1•4 . . I, ,...--.. tr ,, ,,41C,,,,.., „ ".•- --" IIIE ' • '' ‹. * ,',„ '. , '' 4 1"..s "`"i a ..• ,, t. 5 ..,./.....L.. ,.,.'t , .,: t 7 ..., :.........,,,,,..i 0. '..tAt...._ ; • • „ , _..„, ... Cl) -4—......." LIN co , ir:ta A N. ... ,.,. . „h....7.. .4k ..k.c.: ...-, .7. C C Oa. , ,,' ' 7. 77 7-.-„ ,4,,, 2‘ „7.„)At .0 ''Ai..• "c,' (1.) •44,- ,,,4,, 4., < -,— ...... . , tn 0 4.,. ......::' ,° spa ,-, 4...., .; ..:--, triii1,,' „..,-:, --'71,,,,k--Tiviaar,._ ''''''' A*,.•'''''-;..:, .... r, `.- '',',.''' -- I ,' '. '"I -77*. a t. ......., , ' t 4 2 1/2''' 1 ii CD .0 — '''-':-- 4.' ::. !:.'''''..:V. . _ >. • :::-., .::. '--4 > ...,.., ..... -411/ . ,. . . r.“ ' .1 . - . . 1,' ' -- --. " -,......,. :. '..,....c,....e. RSMil r, ' .", ' r( y nk . ' • ..'4 *ffl i.. :0+, +I'l (9 =NJ C C :id- b O. a, 0 St (o a 4. c C CU o_ o I v 3- W CI in 0 T C o 4,1LL vCIJ 1111N p C 4- O J co t a� o z rn _`6 ~00 o o >11 s ea p R E sr 1 CD W11110 CD� a) cu4-0 cu N 0) .; } r `+'P' 'ii 7.0.'1°,,,,7:',41,,, ,,,;„:,•. �, � o ,rd`s M, . � , < ,C 4,iiii.,%:: . t{ ,a Y 4, _E k 0 r-;.,,,,,,,-;.,'.4..*.ji kg' ,,,, .1- ,,,d ..P .1 1 4. > 111 ter,"4„ ti`" iht;,"} I' 0' a0 0 . ••,' •••-•?,/, -,4';',-- -,, j '- --- ,t.-'4.—— , I . .„ , '''i • .a)CL a. nNN� ;rp w'• ti's; jJ 9 t�f Jfk • wH T Si• rte !'. I 117 �tt7 � � �_ 4__._.f,L4 :, '' „„:.A k_ 4�� a�.t r y "" ,\ .t /7 5/ >l:= d 4 ,.. ,ct ,...-,. ,, I/In ,. ., 1\ ,.. ::::',//:::: '' 1 ' 141 _ y�a 4 e", (")-4‘. q �(�1 v 1 - - 4. ''. i '''' o\v\, 44 �� ■ . :t r'''l !` :$'1,--H'''"' r,T," r ` '',"-i-i'•"7'. ":' 8*:,' . `..4...;,..::'. ' ,.'..24. • -. I.. - • 'I In • ' 1 c•.% M ., , G a 1 T t :,.,,;:.:,.....,.:-..:;, ./,,7 t .,--: r r ti V_.r� ,���{.. r�:� I 4 ,1„, f *ryt J "'-, , ;, yam. rrym�t .... }l' { hi iliy�If JJ ,fie . l'''. .. V'' • . : , CD c a as ).LLLL � u_ v�/J �lL L1 LI- mil- GtJ! VJWLLLd3 ��nCf) V� V0! Ti, V��0 0 0 (pt' QW (1) (I) tO 0 0 Wo O OpO 0 OO CD O ON L O OO O O O OO QOOc • 0O © UO O TO O 0 ) N NN , co co 0 r _ —05 __ EL (ii diONX X XO " O O 0 CD n- N --231) co I)X 2X oci Cl X Q Q C >_ Q �`Na Q Q4d 0- 0- QaQaQ c i0 ¢ Lo CO COV Or N ClM T� S2 tC Q. 00 C� T T TT T T Aw M 'Cc u, W p to) L +'_> T N Cv V CL Lcava 0iO V V v 2 2 2LLa ca Lto ca O Q. E - W LI-a) 01.%im'a 0 VCV > L LL ca ca ca 03 aaaL L L ai ca a CO w naaaaV c CQ ca aaaaa .aaa 0 �, u�, e 4 ,:,-,,,,„,,...-- ,;:«i,-,..47-: -v .„,,, ... .4 , . 1 .71:, ....4 ,...., r' !,",,,;,- ,� «fit, y ,,,,,,„ .,....„,;, ., .ii 4 k ; ...., .., ..,',., -,..- ' - ., I..... . : , rlf to ',', ..4;;;,',„, ,, trt-pr4 t i.„ ' :,-,.. I..... ' „ Mho#. $~ ,b�n`' 3 }f .7r t +} ` s i ' i - . !} !` " 'r- M r t- e _ m": • ' *. j / c,,,d 'w.. X .d ,u. ,a". I— 1._,,,..-:!". s ^-.�� h {...,.14111 t M pt( ! r 7 a j ,,ii, €R' i � i �� '�' at.r r, " 4 , _ �? ! ' V10' •AoP! • - — �' ,1 ' Ens miff' \h, ‘`' •'.• _ . J d . �wf ;4 ,,,,t': , ,, - PEON sseaad� �' - 1 .fa r j II t r w� ! r4 i a w7+�► a. * s t t e,�},A, .. L L . -$�e, s K a.t.reGlltJ • (• !it' t - 1 r.a � ` E r4 i • -• ; N-..-- ` f5 J „!n.. .. � .fit !Y �} Lis Alma v CD C7 as ozz �/ s- N � u ♦ ♦ Q ^Cf) !A O N 6i. CCS C7 'r r) i1 C) v c� Z . . • �. R . J . L 11 -' '' i.+ iy 2 ,,- ; - :-- -:r ._., 11 1/2'\'‘ it'04440 }- (-,,A.',, ef ,,, v k,',' ,,-:'.„,4.,,,,,,47„,,'14"'".,','...%7, ,i:k.,:.",,,,"-7-:',.`,"„:,,'," •' ,•.:P..,,,,„ ..,. ,...'..0 .'-',---,;__.'-,*.,,,,,,„ ,,,, = . ,, r 0 ) ,• .. ' � ' � :� '� sir �' i I . � '� `,a y %i, i F ` ,. F. 1 ,Y l f_ • 1 f 2 - . z w > v 4 I444.41g,fr`'. '1":" ° Ni td . " A °Z 4 VY It' k -� y yk kA ce. .�_ 1 i W. ikt4. r . ,may".,,Ks'irl." '-'\\''''' 'r..::,,, A �" `u v s i xa .44-24w + `, gam. i Wt �,.? i),7,1? -,-''w 1,1 '1 }y--,:'A.:',„,' � ` koil ' . � S •� w__ pf; � _' ''- it, •x ..070-'..^ � . A'l. " t9a r r R ' � Cii�; s +iF� Yt„,,..,,,,,,_, s :w' ._ Y . . ) ? E O EO O C) O r (1) 43) O r O r E 0 .„ re N to ��. _ 1 v � � � � c ,� t v C) q_ sem- — , �� -o cNi X43 CDa, kJ O;� O. Z A. Z° CU V OC ) : . C p o N U a C N �-+ ZW w ° U ~ L o o U No 0 N N O CNet W H4.1 'O0 to) N ° 73 v w tE1Jf11 R3 � � � D � � w o m f a L — oommO Ni„.„-....._..„. • .,,._,,__ 11101 -411110( O N 0 N 0 N a r- O N IMOMMIIMM 00 O N room iO N c o c 0, } •C C C C >- C "C C al c 0 0 a, a, 0J !_' a! a, t0 V '� 'a� U rn c > E b E— v u c aa) Q v a me Q� U N na v �13 6i�v m an urn Ea ca c 'u vC 'Ca, o � — �, .- , . +tea' fl- T � .0 a, t ai u c m c 'o'o - -cc) � :° b c as -acro u ''' C 7 C o C a, 3 o a, au E curd a, 4- o-c .5 o u Ow n- w Ow w u.. u_ 0oi— 66 CD :E O 5u 0:10f1- 0 440 ...e..., EtU-1 44 ,--...:1,-"i-,•;iii o-1,:._;- \ s7'.%'".-----*•j• < In .,-,- .„,-. , 0 „0„....„,.. qo ces , u .fs , VI '— ' t-) c (/) U C" Z5- a, cy, . .. < 0 , CL rd.11111111 illrLli ; .. . I" ,. .+Js ' ----- .. C 40 %1-!). t, o .,„ ,( ,:, ci- C , 11 40. iE E - - *• n '',' a t"; ,, . . tA "\ ' .'.r , 0 . E 0 E ..-4 U .' o as Silt 1 U F- M , • .., . • ..., . .. , , •,. .„. ., C Ta 5 7-3 ' . :::'‘,-'' -.','''''-'--",-'•;.','-^.-, -.74: ....... U : _c-c3 \'so., o c .., in la) a) eftLir •- 4., N• LI LI o E 0 MO c 0 l-r1 D u 0 •rim 4) > = 62 C •Nil CO 11111 Li C 00 w INC •416 lailli , O r_I-1 Z H a) r:21 H W N IV S � � rY} U Q 0.r ry E y,�../r�• CO 11) 0 0 s U N 0 0 s 1.- 0 0 s 0) CU Z v in N a) O rtl in N in CU cv •N E crti : E *' m o •N N s U = L r>� •+� � Q •`' 3 C N U r s C w a .0 U o o E _ tro , t s H N E t-)� a) o I— O rt a 01 -0 '+1 aJ s C Q r0 +- •• C � i O C lin a) Q o > r� .— C LI LI a) v1 M . . a) v1 LIJX Iti _ a1 -0 O 0 v c ' N 0 ri LL V1 f� v C (�1 O S �' S C }' E L 5 N (f) c as rd ina — 0 '- 0 i X - f D . U V rCS al O O O O O ZAIX Attk .7' - --1 '„b.. '.1,-•‘,T. ',„,1.,-, , • • ' II , r . - - . , ' 11:",4 11,1 C % • t;' i.‘ , . ....i.P '' dell."11f 4 I ' 1, -- 4:4! " 43 • 1, -F . '.!' , . 1 t t, • '4.,,, ., ..; sc.:. '11:1: '', -.-• ' . . . . r , 1 ,i.) -, ',, „,. ' !',.•'; . ' , • ' . : * t''i '''i ',,t, :, . . ,. '''. ; .,, 4 i 1 ': ''',1: •" t":, ;: :11 _.. ,e‘ I l'..,' : ' ,. ..•_ kt•::• ,' *:''''It * t ••'-1,,, ' ---4,,!, , „ ..1. „ /.0.41 .. • • ., 4 . '''s, t.t''•'7Id'i,„1 ' ,r-: -f' . • 1.,;,. : i ty -,., , - , 11„:::-.,,:rt il 1 , t.',,,4,..i,,,, ,,,i,„„, .‘ ., -,...,•4, J ,„ ., . ' • ,'-= 1 4 , ::. .i. ; , _•,-: , , r ''i'; .:-. , , iitp,,+ 'A ;'.4.!;.'• "/, ' ` 1 ' '-4* ,'..,',1".**11' '.° ;I ; •,:, -. : i,i,.;-,-!*'' \ tisr -2„ , . .* ' . ,-4,, .:, i. .1 ; , s..::!.:''-'', . ....— _ to. .. ,1„,,,'11- 11 ) . , ., ” X t.,Yf.,',..t, , „.„ j 4. fr—VI. -, $ '1' a't !: '., — 73... . - gi ...- i 14, . .. , .._.... .* ,.iIiLiL1 A..-,1ti'P.'.'„—.,,,'-i4,-,i;4)i,I..;,-..,.,..J.:.i-.;.-.v_••,.,P•..i:,':,!c`,..1,i..',„f.s......,f'',::',.'(.'1;6-4.:-..-9,,,,,,,„*—);,,-k'''',r-,''-...''..'1'i..''-..,:'','*-,',,,:'.7.11..-.,„z:„,-*.-...-..1'' , ...,, \ - ,.,,,.,/ ‘ , 4 : . \ '• : . , r 4/ /1 .... r , •. . , .' . i • 1 .. ., .,.I' . : I.' / ‘— .-i'''' .*.,,;:' :1.-, ' ..; . / .,.---; . V,'..,..;-, . 1 • l' ,,,' ., -„f. %''' i , • e<,,, / . . ..., ,..,...„ . ...,. .,. 4 -,'• '.,•,4 -'0 ' ''.• t d , .i . I ',.''' ' ' ., ''•,,%.4.0,' S‘L"I''' \dff .. 7,-- ..fr, ' '.. 1,'..,. • N— / N-- .,-.. n , , . CN I. , .., .,... In”' s._ '. 7%.' '' 'I 1 ,'S LI. w . .•• • . , k' •,•,4'' , . , . , , ,4, ...C) . ,, , ,..ic 1..,..1s. ,„.,..#1., . '1" .. 11 ,. . a) • • . t . ..,.. , . ,, .. cl_ . ..„ . a) , .'i•..''..;i. '. I,, "l';'',..,' .,,,i,L,,''„.'''.,,;`,S ,_ - ,'. ' ' 41 (1) ''.' ;''',:"i'''2-'11''''1',1'.‘'', ':it,,t'';' .4 ,1,$;' '.,,,•„\r ... :•- •,-,,,,,• „.-,.-'.., „.. t, .. ,,, ,,,, , ....4,,,,..,..., : , .. „:„:„.. ,.., • . . . ,.. ,.., , ,_.:....,..,.,-..,. ,... ,,. ,. .,„ : .Afici .. _ - ...,.. „ ..f.,.. ,.;.:4 1 '' ,.,:!, o -.- .. I --"r",,;111711;-,747,',-7::.7-..1-;; _ I.. .._ I M., " •`' fes•. „'�`. Y � � �fa ` °G ."•t_ . lik-1 -,,- i A r- .v_ i r i -gyp I ii 4. ice ' i Vs R ',,- ,.--:-J.il ••. if! x 4 , I:,,,i x+ • 'fir _ !I tl pu v„ LL`,._ , _ E k... 7 �,•, '�y� :i •. . „ ( '"4 i W i-silty..d tr..:6.-- O N I V, I'''•, ‘11*"--:--i&I‘ ILL ai t E ;1 . ( '4K ::-...'-:'.....-1----4:27::7::11: 2l�S' O H Z L_ U Qcn rcs co c .4-, • ... .t (4(mt al % (7- fi o ° -0m a, - .N.,..._.#0•0 A.3_N13 >c CU c d- u o Z oQ . - 0 CV N m W CO 61 C 0 • U N 0 c— a 0 o (' O c N N ® \� v O to ���1 j �0 i w U \/ LO 1 ‘'a e,,, e Item Coversheet Page 1 of 1 ,414A CITY CITY OF EDINA 0 1.. � 4801 West 50th Street . may° Edina, MN 55424 • `�Yiti1"ctlAtt�• www.edinamn.gov IHetl Date: September 13, 2017 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Subject: 2018 Planning Commission Work Plan ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the 2018 Work Plan INTRODUCTION: Attached is the 2018 Work Plan. Given the work load of Planning Commission regarding Land Use Application the Goal for 2018. That includes all of the small area plans including, 50th and France, 70th and Cahill, Southda https://edina.novusagenda.com/AgendaWeb/CoverSheet.aspx?ItemID=3524 9/5/2017 0 / r T-3 S... C . v -6 -7.1- S,0211(:--I'"........." . . m ' CO oWUc C o-- U ':(211 / ),2 E 4-- a) U •- Q L a) U • O.. �O a Q1 cu 'a � _ ° r -a +-, a a) U ra CL C .- >. a) .- Q. CU 47 kUP S�' 'z a) c to L = a (13 3 E v a ro in p �yS/ a) M c- a cr. E ° .0 c ° v v a) O a_ ° an c c N = c E ro up E t0E ao c p C °1 C O 0 ao.4- o N m O Q �, _ c C o a �. o y O `n o ° 4- ° Q. 75 3 0 a) o O = Fs 23 c \ 'Lc; c c v a 3 J C a h0 ro to 4- r N 4- d 00 o_ •- C c O '�' C y. VHF- II-- OS c f1 'C Q 4- 4- CU" - n3 C •- n3 .� ,-,m o 4- Q. C i C } a I- oC -3 o C N I- a N 4.0 N >- o_ co u a CD c Oa d > Oys,. s" c O a 'O C O C (O co _c Cr 1:11 ON C .V) 73 +-, v OC ra C i O C co a..' J CP .J U O `''- O -0 d dD 44_ c = O 4 m Z m >- C_) O -c -0 C a) > a) C o. a � . 0 7 �I 0 0 O 0 w 0 000 C U aJ >. U 47, C :►7, p O 1 CL ±1 N d 0 d N Q as O_ r-i o > o •v, co v E m u +, .- O i a) +_' v a n3 U a V .0 E c s ° la) to cu N do CU U o +_ N 'a 00 +� - 4'' c-I = ca CO a) c 0 0 ~ N C O OZUCDOE ra c > +.C+ L +� :O .Q 3 _ cB H N .0 a) O - 70 a) a) L. 'in i f0 asC C O @ a) C r3 s_ o_ E u >, 0 a) l0 p Q O OA 0 0 46 > Q p — > - J CO a) •C N (O d• CC c--I O 0 = •a) '> o E 0 m an V)0 E W v► a) 0 ca a) v E a) L' a) 0 a) •- .0 V i 6 ccC X a, • 110 ci. c o 0 '> O a3 70 0 U v U . 0 Oc v ani •_ OO Q 0 v ° c acn > co a L -a 0 O Q N i .0 a) .,� ❑X .0 C U U N a) 4J .- a) N n3 U n x > QJ •- Q) (� cz +� O 0 Q W v7 d +0 •- a ate- ❑ '+� a) — i 0.. Q0. O >- aa) 4-' } a O U s c m C v a-' E -0 QU a) ::-.)- — 0 v) O a) G) ❑ v a) +� C .Q O .D_ X u p a) - a) N Q c LQ (.,•) @ O O • a) U v 'a - 0 W , c N a) i C ro '� o = a) tD •+.' C O a) C in E iii a) f6 N -- -a 2 v cn .0 N c o + ° n o v O ++ -C t c n I- v C U ❑ o N c s Ls) El U v) a) } Q Q }' U •CD C) a) U Q g o +� cn c ,._ c -a N E • •v c •� E • U — o •a ❑ E iii '"6 r0 N O E a) .k, U a a-1 ❑ d C OU el 47' al - 0 m 3 N a) o .n u ° n. s CD CO ac) U C O ,> v v o • G U -a - CO 00 - n O U d1 .- C v ;~ c c cLo v Ev E o toCe CUco 0 Q v c o Gl E c o > E .o E L H v, U C In - t p °) N N ' c .@ .. L v O o. i C f6 4) .� 4) Q co v s o - CO — o z .o n c CC• z E a Ca N UD. = ❑ co ._ DU 1° °' :� v a - ❑ u°O2 461. \ ; a) E -C \ _ ae uc / zz � 3 ; \ 2t - W 13 \ / \ / ) 0 • / 2 % / a \ co 0_ = a $ E [ / / / a c CL / - a o ° ƒ C d 2 g 3 / k o / s ( / _ CU - )0 - 2 2 5 E 3 = j ® ± ° a = — V _ ',13 G = : e m e 0 E _ N f m % 3 _y \ E / \ z 0 / V) 3 \ ƒ / W CU 2 % \ c / . = � �CU cri \ q � � 4- / q 3 13 a . Et. .g t .§ ƒ CO Q $ / .E c \ o ƒ f 2 c o E el \ E 0 :- o > O Q \ % k � 0 / . u y. •- \ tII ■ § c 2 R c G 2 § '- _ > k I » ° ° .- as E Q / s // c • § CV 0 N. / q CI E / / / \ / - : • . © / J CU s S C 0 CO 7 ei £ E < D / \ E w § ) • er e ) e . \ k § 2 \ ❑ ..1=.> % 3 \ \ / B 2 E e % / 2 = k / y m C ° / / •s e s e 2 , u -0 ' a � 2 0 (■ ❑ ) y 9 / \ 0. / = \ \ : 3 { a) / f O 2 § U1 m • N° •4_7. _ u u / 2 ƒ al = - 0 / \ / \ / c [ / S § E u c _ o CZ § w / U t 0 ❑> > 0 c u o E \ . .. a E CL '6 \ E c � G £ / o a J u c 0 � u C 0 \.. > j CU / n V' § •/ 0 I % .\ / c § 2 Cl) 3 - f ® ® @ 9 $ 2 3 / $ / O a D u o U a City of Edina, Minnesota - Intranet: City Manager Presents Proposed Budget Page 1 of 1 the Ccif Wednesday, August 16, 2017 City Manager Presents Proposed Budget By Scott Neal The City Council began its evening Tuesday, Aug. 15, with a work session to address three issues. The first issue was a presentation on my proposed 2018-2019 City budget. Council Members will consider my proposal over the next two weeks. They will establish the City's preliminary tax levy at its meeting Sept. 6. That is the first big decision by the City Council for next year's budget. I would like employees to know about my budget proposal and read it online. Following the budget presentation, the Council received a presentation on the Grandview Green Project and discussed the possibility of participating in an affordable housing project in the Southdale area. Following the work session, the Council met in regular session and made the following decisions: • Rejected bids for the proposed Centennial Lakes Park Bridge Replacement Project. The City will rebid the project later this winter with hopes of construction next year. • Approved a retroactive change order for the 2016 Tracy Avenue road reconstruction project. • Approved the purchase of a new evaporative condenser for the south rink at Braemar Arena. • Approved the purchase of two new trucks for the Public Works Department. • Granted final rezoning and development approvals for The Villas apartment project at 5109-25 W. 49th St. • Approved a request from Hennepin County to upgrade the functional classification of a segment of Vernon Avenue. It was a relatively short agenda and meeting last night. Return to list. ©2017 City Of Edina, Minnesota https://extranet.edinamn.gov/index.php?section=viewall_news&prrid=651&c... 9/8/2017 5- - To 8 U Q Y E r E a) a.) E CU o O .n m E E c E N a) a a (13W E E -0 E CU cc C o 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 ..„,27...o, 0 aaJ Z O) m a) 0) N -f 0O in e- Cr ..Zr c .1 c! CO cc -a c Es m c 0 '' N C ti CO O) O) v. 0) •C 0) Cr) CO CO (n C 'C1:7) N yam,, U R' U a) E U Q CO m m i� N CO E O O 2 U U �O U J E C al J 41 3 5 0 a) c 0 Q t, O) vi a) z 1,4 O O ONO O O L a) pp 0 L Y Q) _C .0 -O N a) Co N M to C) ll) W U7 LO M C O O o o �- tt E w ch 75 C i a) a) > a) a) a) C N 4t a) o y _c > _c y -0 a a E a) y Cl..) N N N 7 a) U -O -O -O -O -O C E al C U C C C C Co O (U C 7 7 7 7 7 0 L' co - - - u) a 3 C V aJ C a) a) a) a) a) ‘-- CU ate) Z p Q H H H H H H as m o� E 2 Z O � V a) m c O .c a) m as in (I) E w -0 -0 (A 3 z -0 m g.) CC 2 r H J C C 0) C C C .15 a) Q _ ,— ,- ,- .- c- `- .--- N- C N _ O C N-• 0 to 0 O 0 u) N E U _ y.I O) O) O 0) O) 0) O :? r — T- T- T- T- N- c- T- c- ,--- cu Z C C E C C C C U » r=Lij 3 JO Z0 Lu E E c E E E to Z O Z .0 y -� w .0 w o m r 7 0 t Z o 0 m o 0 0 ,°) 0 Jr .- .- c- c- c p ; _c .c N -C r -o 11. U = C C V) C C Q C a) r ,- ,- ,-- ,-- �-- ,-- 0 o O Y O O > a) Q 3 c' E E o E E E' -o_ V V 4-' C a) a) > a) a) a) w '1' (1) -C L -C -C1 c T- ,-- 7- A- A- T- 1- r-- @ yy ..: .-' _ .-' .. E Cl)'- o C 5 a) a) a) a) a) 7 - C) r ,- N-- ,- .-- c- H 1- N- — a) N 'O -O -0 -O -0 C N C C C C C 0 E r ,— ,— ,— ,— ,— — 4-. 7 S 7 7 7 C a) 0) LLp y = _ = v) E c l- E 0 a 0 m 0 ° m d 0 o- n Q. a n a)` s E H y 0 H H H H H H 3 V - a) 3 C E .2 _ - c E 7 0 -c V) C U 7 O co U 0 U N Z O 7 c N In -d -3 C 0 7 T w y N - d O C c v) 0 0 o > c v c U 0) 0) .N c m '> Q C E -0 N C CU 4, = c = N c 0 > I Z > c E O p ca a) C a) O a .U) Cao) 73 a) a cq a) Q C H v -C c a 0 F- a) a.) ° -0 c in o @ c _ L7 > 'II r3 (n Y 7 0 ° a) a) .1, 3 ° v o a H o it; Z O ate) °' - 0 y CD v) v = i v vi 03C 7 U 0 U ` • O Q) (U �, aJ CO > .ro a) a) O a) CO O- >_ S 0 J m = H Lr, Z CO -, Y n r cK Q U U) 14 0)