Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 09-27 Planning Commission Meeting Packet Agenda Planning Commission City Of Edina, Minnesota City Hall, Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Wednesday, September 27, 2017 7:00 PM I. Call To Order II. Roll Call III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A. Minutes, Planning Commission, September 06, 2017 V. Public Hearings A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - OR, Office Residential District; Estelle Edina, 69th & France B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, CUP and Variances - 4404 & 4416 Valley View Road, and 6108, 6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue VI. Community Comment During"Community Comment,"the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. 70th and Cahill Working Group applicant approval VIII. Correspondence And Petitions IX. Chair And Member Comments X. Staff Comments Xl. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: -' Minutes • e City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers September 6, 2017, 7:00 P.M. I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Commissioners Hobbs, Lee, Strauss, Hamilton, Berube, Chair Olsen. Student Member Mittal. Staff, City Planner, Teague, Assistant Planner, Bodeker, Communications Coord., Eidsness, Support Staff, Hoogenakker Members Absent: Jones, Nemerov, Thorsen, Bennett. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner Strauss to approve the September 6, 2017, meeting agenda. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lee. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A motion was made by Commissioner Hobbs to approve the minutes of the August 30, 2017, meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Strauss. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Public Hearings A. Variance. 5401 Blake Road, Edina, MN. First floor elevation variance. Staff Presentation Planner Bodeker addressed the Commission and reported that JMS Custom homes has submitted a variance application to increase the first floor elevation of a new home 4.I feet higher than the current first floor elevation. A demolition permit for the house that existed at 5401 Blake Road was pulled in December 2012 and the subject property sits vacant today. Before the house was demolished, the existing house was oriented to the west towards Blake Road. The proposed house will be oriented to the north, and be addressed off of Pine Grove Road. pg. 1 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: The existing basement elevation of the home is at 942.6. The proposed first floor elevation is 946.7. The zoning ordinance allows for a maximum I-foot increase in height of an existing first floor. The applicant is asking for a 3.1-foot variance to increase the first floor height by 4.1 feet. Planner Bodeker concluded that staff recommends approval of a 3.I foot 1st floor height variance to allow the construction of a new home that will be more than one foot (4.1 feet total) above the existing first floor elevation of the previous home located at 5401 Blake Road. Approval is also subject to the he following conditions: Survey date stamped August II, 2017. Elevations and building plans date stamped August II, 2017 Revised site plan with city comments dated August 31, 2017. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer's memo. Appearing for the Applicant Tom Bakritges,JMS Custom Homes Applicant Presentation Mr. Bakritges told the Commission he met with adjoining neighbors, adding the meeting was positive. Bakritges said reorienting the new home to Pine Grove Road made the most sense, adding it also eliminates a curb cut on Blake Road. Bakritges explained the site would continue to drain to the southeast. He said that (as requested) a drainage pipe system would also be added to minimize water runoff. Concluding, Bakritges said the house as proposed is at the lowest elevation that "works", adding in his opinion the new house works well with the site and adjoining neighbors. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Hamilton moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments Commissioners acknowledged that the request to build a new house orienting on Pine Gove Road makes sense. It was also suggested that Staff ensure that any added fill, removal of fill or movement of fill on lot be monitored to ensure that Code is met and that the site drains properly. The discussion also focused on drainage and if the best solution to this site and other sites was to tie into the City system at the curb or would other methods be more productive. pg. 2 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: Planner Teague responded that the Engineering Division was nearing completion of the City's Storm Water Management Plan. When the plan is completed a joint meeting between Planning and Engineering Commissions would occur. Teague suggested at that time the any questions on drainage and best practices could be discussed. Commissioners agreed that a discussion on drainage would be helpful. Motion A motion was made by Commissioner Hamilton to approve the variance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Berube. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Special Recognitions and Presentations A. Grandview Green: A Case Study for Lid Development in Minnesota. Planner Teague introduced Katie Clark Sieben, Economic Development Project Consultant. Consultant Presentation Ms. Sieben addressed the Commission and briefed Commissioners on past work on the Grandview District Area Plan and updated the Commission on the initial lid concept. With graphics, Sieben presented the following on "Grandview Green": • The proposed "lid" would reconnect neighborhoods and communities divided by Highway 100. • Increases economic productivity. • Enhances sustainability practices through increases in storm water collection, potential solar installations, etc. • Leverages unused public land. • Serves as a case study for lid development in Minnesota. • Creates a place with a unique identity. • Rethinks and reorganizes the District's transportation infrastructures. Continuing, Sieben explained that the Grandview Green Feasibility Study found the following: • No major fatal flaws in the development of a green lid over limited portions of Highway 100. This concept has the potential to create 13 acres of new buildable land. • The area has the potential to support 2, 525 new parking spaces and 2.4 million square feet in private development. • After completion, property tax revenue is projected to increase approx. $2 million to $100 million. pg. 3 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: . • Public investment is needed for this project with an estimate of$37 million. • Several public entities could be involved in the project to include MnDOT, Metropolitan Council, Hennepin County and the City of Edina. • The initial economic analysis predicts the public investment of$37 million could realize a 348% return on investment for a I 5-year period. Sieben concluded sharing visual lid concepts. Chair Olsen opened the discussion to Commissioners: Discussion/Comments Commissioners commented on and raised the following: • Commissioners expressed the opinion that they were intrigued by the lid concept and find it very interesting, bold and innovative. • Sieben was asked the reason Edina is considering a "lid", is it to achieve more greenspace, public space or to increase revenue. Sieben responded that she believes it is both, adding the lid would provide public spaces along with private development opportunities. • Sieben was asked who initiated the study. Sieben responded that the City Council provided the opportunity for the study. • The question was raised if the Grandview Area was the best place for the lid and the use of public dollars. The importance of a healthy Southdale Campus was stressed and it was pointed out if $37 million was invested in the Greater Southdale Area and the Southdale Campus the public benefit would be great. • Commissioners asked if other lid locations in Edina were considered (France/Crosstown). Sieben responded that she does not believe so, adding this location is being considered as a "case study" or "pilot" study, adding that the City is working closely with MnDOT on this "pilot" study. Sieben noted that if successful, lids could be built in other areas of the City and throughout the Metro area. Commissioners indicated they were pleased with the initial support from MnDOT. Sieben reiterated MnDOT has interest in this concept. • Again, it was expressed that the lid concept was great, ambitious, forward thinking and continues Edina's leadership in the development arena; however, this project requires a significant public component to make it work. It was noted if interest is "out there" to invest public dollars further thought should be given to areas of Edina that may need greater attention. Again, is this the best place or is another location more worthy. A discussion ensued with Commissioners stressing how important it is to them to continue to have a vibrant successful Southdale campus. The importance of maintaining that area as a vibrant and healthy destination for Edina residents and visitors to the City is very important and cannot be dismissed. Planner Teague agreed, adding with the future changes in retail that it is important to maintain Southdales status; however, the proposed lid location is something that came out of the Grandview Area Plan. At pg. 4 Draft Minutes® Approved Minutes❑ Approved Date: that time the Council expressed interest in developing a type of"civic center" connecting City Hall to the neighborhood across Highway 100. Commissioners agreed and acknowledged the work of the Grandview Area Study; however, suggested that the City Council further study this concept and location and take a step back and look at the needs of the entire City. Commissioners also noted there are many "what ifs" out there. It was pointed out that even though MnDOT has expressed interest this is the first time a development project would implement right-of-way to achieve success. It was also noted that there are so many variables in the partnership, between local, State, and County. In conclusion, Commissioners also said attention must be paid to what is developed noting building height and density could become an issue. Chair Olsen thanked Ms. Sieben for her presentation. VII. Community Comment No one spoke. Commissioner Strauss moved to close Community Comment. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. Community Comment closed. VIII.Reports and Recommendations A. 2018 Planning Commission Work Plan Planner Comments Planner Teague said at this time he would recommend that the Work Plan be adopted as presented. Teague said he envisions updating the Comprehensive Plan including all small area plans to be a full time job. Teague said in his opinion in 2018 the Commission should focus on the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioners agree. Motion Commissioner Berube moved to adopt the 2018 Planning Commission Work Plan. Commissioner Hobbs seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IX. Chair And Member Comments Chair Olsen introduced and welcomed Anand Mittal as the new Student Member to the Commission. Anand Mittal thanked the Commission for this opportunity and informed them he was a Senior at the High School. Commissioner Berube updated the Commission on 44th and France Small Area Plan working group. pg. 5 Draft Minutes Approved Minutes[II Approved Date: X. Staff Comments Planner Teague reported that the 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan is seeking members to serve on the Committee. Teague said all interested should visit the website and apply. Teague said that work is still being done to complete the consultant contract for the Greater Southdale Area plan. He said he hopes the contract would be confirmed at the first Council meeting in October. It was also suggested that the Commission liaisons to the small area plans look outside their specific area to find members, noting small area plans benefit the entire City. Xl. Adjournment Motion Commissioner Strauss moved to adjourn the meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 8:30 P.M. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. (2f-lO ,i #0069.00/4/6 Respectfully submitted pg. 6 STAFF REPORT '&(121 G_ O j`cORf'ORf`I�`. 18 Esfi Date: August 27, 2017 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment— Estelle Edina, 69th & France Avenue Information / Background: Ryan Companies on behalf of Luigi Bernardi, is requesting an amendment to the Edina Comprehensive Plan regarding height and density in the OR, Office Residential District. (See location on page Al.) The specific request is to increase the density from 30 units per acre to 60 units per acre, and increase the height maximum from four stories and 48 feet, to allow height to exceed four stories up to 26 stories and 360 feet. (See location and applicant narrative and plans on pages A2-A5 I.) The purpose of the request is for Ryan Companies to construct a multi-phase mixed use development at the southwest corner of 69th and France. (See development plans on pages A7- A51.) 7- A5I.) Phase I of the project would include 11,000 square feet of retail that would include a restaurant, office and bank; 6 owner occupied townhouse; 92 owner-occupied condos. Phase 2 of the project would be a 22 story building with retail on the main level and 75 owner occupied condos. Of the housing units, 20% would be included for affordable housing in each phase. This request before the Planning Commission and City Council does not include a Rezoning or Site Plan review. If the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is approved by the City Council, the applicant would then come back with Rezoning and Site Plan review applications. It is at that time that the details of the project would be reviewed, and considered for approvals. Because this request includes 20% of the housing units to be for affordable housing, this would require a 3/5 vote of approval by the City Council. Minnesota State Law mandates that if projects contain 20% of the units for affordable housing to persons with incomes no greater than 60% of the area median income, and with respect to rental units, the rents for affordable units do not exceed 30 percent of 60 percent of area median income, then the approving vote for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment be done by a majority vote. A super majority vote (2/3) is typically required. (See state law on page A6a.) City of Edina • 4801 W 50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 STAFF REPORT Page 2 As this is a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the City has complete discretion as to approving or denying this request. (See the pyramid of discretion on page A6b.) Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendments Density The OR, Office Residential Area allows up to 30 units per acre. This density is low given the density that has been considered as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study. Densities that have been contemplated to date have been 80 units per acre over the whole of the district. The thinking behind that density has been to allow greater densities in between France and York (100-125 units per acre; the CAC, Community Activity Center allows up to 105 units per acre in the existing Comprehensive Plan); and lesser densities 50-75 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. Below is table of existing high density developments in the City. Note that the trend in multi- family development is higher density. This is due to the high cost of land in Edina, the City's requirement for affordable housing, and the added cost of redeveloping a site with existing buildings. High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 6500 France—Senior 6500 France 188 80 Housing STAFF REPORT Page 3 Lennar - Onyx 6725 York 240 52 Estelle Edina 69th& France 173 53 5000 France 5000 France 23 29 The Collaborative Market Street I 3 I 46 Gateway Point 66th & York 19 I 96 The Millennium 66th & York 372 60 Lincoln Residences 5901 Lincoln 250 30 Drive Red—Indicates recent projects Example Residential Density Ranges in Surrounding City's Comprehensive Plans City Range— Per Acre Bloomington Medium Density Residential 5-I 0 High Density Residential No limit General Business 0-83 Commercial 0-83 (Community & Regional) High Intense mix use 0-60 Airport South mix use 30-13 I Richfield Medium Density Residential 7-12 High Density Residential Minimum of 24 High Density Res./Office Minimum of 24 Mixed Use 50+ St. Louis Park Medium Density Residential 6-30 High Density Residential 20-75 (PUD for high end) Mixed Use 20-75 (PUD for high end) Commercial 20-50 Minnetonka Medium Density Residential 4-12 High Density Residential 12+ Mixed Use No range established (density based on site location and site conditions.) Minneapolis Medium Density (mixed use) 20-50 STAFF REPORT Page 4 High Density (mixed use) 50-120 Very High Density(mixed use) 120+ The site's location on an arterial roadway provides a good location for higher density. The Comprehensive Plan currently suggests allowing higher density subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. The proposed project would contain most of these elements. There is adequate utility capacity available. There is a transit station located at Southdale. A traffic study was done by Spack Consulting and concludes that there would be minimal impact to the roads, and the existing roads could support the development. (See study on pages A72-A141.) WSB has also done a traffic study of the entire Southdale Area, and also concludes that the proposed density could be supported by the roadway network. (See pages A142-A191.) Underground parking would be included; there would be minimal surface parking lots at ultimate buildout; open space/public area is provided along the front streets and in front of the building in phase I; affordable housing is proposed to meet the City of Edina policy of 10% of the area proposed for housing, and the State of Minnesota requirement that 20% of the units be sold to persons with incomes at 60% of the average median income, and with respect to rental units, the rents for affordable units do not exceed 30 percent of 60 percent of area median income. This area is adjacent to the CAC, Community Activity Center, which is the City's most intense development district. (See page A I.) A case could be made for extending the CAC to the West side of France to match the area east of York. Please note that the density allowed east of York Avenue adjacent to single-family homes to the east is 105 units per acre. Height The most significant request of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment is in regard to height, going from a 4-story and 48-foot limit to up to 26 stories and 360 feet. However, height is typically a function of a Zoning Regulation and not a specific requirement in a Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plans typically discuss height in general parameters, and gives guidance for allowing greater height than the Zoning allows as part of a variance or rezoning request. The proposed amendment would allow the City Council to do just that. All of the height limitations that are suggested currently in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan have been memorialized into the Zoning Ordinance with the adoption of the Height Overlay District. (See the adopted Height Overlay District map on page A5.) An amendment could give the City Council specific criteria to review when considering this project or any other with height limits over four stories. Approving this Comprehensive Plan Amendment would not obligate the City Council to approve a rezoning or height variance for this project. The merits of that request would be considered at that time. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Additionally, there is a general code provision that requires buildings that are taller than nine stories to be setback six times the building height to property zoned R-I, Single Dwelling Unit District. This standard would require a building that is 360 feet tall to be setback 2,160 feet from the nearest single-family home. The proposed buildings would have a setback of 410 and 440 feet. The tallest buildings in the City of Edina are generally in the Southdale areas. The building contemplated for this site however, would be the tallest building in the City. The tallest buildings in Edina include: Park Plaza and Westin at I 8-stories; Edina Towers at I 7-stories and the Durham Apartment and Point of France at 13 stories. (See a map and pictures of the tallest buildings in the Southdale area on pages A54-A71.) Note that the 13 story Durham is located on the east side of York adjacent to single-family residential homes. If this building were located on the east side of France, across the street, the visual impact would be very similar to the neighborhood to the west. In potentially allowing buildings over four stories, the city could continue to restrict height adjacent to the single-family homes at 4-stories, through the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed taller buildings would be located adjacent to France. The map on the following page shows how the Comprehensive Plan could be amended to accommodate the change in height designation. In making this change, the allowed height on this block could be expanded to over four stories, subject to City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD. The specific requirements that would have to be included in a rezoning or variance application are listed right after the map on page 7. STAFF REPORT Page 6 Legend UDR.Low Denali},Residential OR-0110e Residential -RN-Regional Medical LDAR-Low Density Attached ResidentHi EN0.Office =OSP-0pen Space and Parks MDR-Mechem Density Residential -MXC-Mixed Use Center POP-Publc0Seml-Pudic I-LR-High Densly Residential CAC-CormwnlyR Idly Center LAH-United Access Highway -NC-Neighborhood Commercial -I-Industrials i C3 ii 2 1 )�R ` wbahst 4 — m H -^.,� -" .. `3'�,_+.,1 65th sr ' _12 ' .r f.Y"... r -._ '.6th St -_° c — ''---411? 2 12 3-j OR 0 ('-:(' 4 .,,, w dat SI i 2 10 � aia 3 ri. ,"-,' .L a m Z.• - ' M _ i 11111/ IV n f s Height Limits 4nil L . N m t 2 Stories:24' t. o ' 3 Stories:36' a ': � 4 Stories:48' 0 5 Stories:60' .. 4 ' 8 Stories:96' 2 2 9 Stories:108' w 4 10 Stories:120' ,w„A1e 111)1t ei, 4 v'I 12 Stories:144' Ili , Standard Height \\\ f ,lift W 76th Sl 9 V.^., II Podium Height �ll)K 4 p "+ { , ,R � `. ..1 o « ,At 1(11(''' it g z 2 wnfnst OR 1 o 0,,00000,Or OR ; I ,1ovrii .rirgtori Future Land Use Plan with %� Building Heights Southeast Quadrant ri °a City of Edina ®�� 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figure 4.6B Height may be increased up to twenty-six stories and *Height may be increased to six stories&75 feet if 360 feet on a case by case basis,subject to review and podium height is utilized on York and Xerxes subject to approval of the City Council as part of a rezoning or review and approval of the City Council. i variance request.(See review criteria below) STAFF REPORT Page 7 The allowed height south of 69th Street, north of 70th Street, west of France and west of Valley View Road could be expanded to over 4 stories and 48 feet up to 26 stories and 360 feet subject to City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD or a variance for a project that must include but not be limited to the following: Project must include affordable housing to meet the State requirement that 20% of the housing units be provided for affordable housing for persons that earn no greater than 60% of the area median income and with respect to rental units, the rents for affordable units do not exceed 30 percent of 60 percent of area median income. 2. Project must meet the City's affordable housing policy. 3. Project must provide underground parking. 4. Project must include public art. 5. Public enhancement of the sidewalks around the perimeter and through the site; including a 50 foot setback from the paved portion of France Avenue and 30 feet back from 69th to include sidewalks and green space. 6. Building must be of high quality architecture subject to review and approval of the City Council as part of a Rezoning. 7. Project must include sustainable design principles subject to approval of the City Council. 8. The development must adequately respond to the Greater Southdale Area Guiding Principles. 9. Project must include public space. 10. Project must include accommodation for bikes. I I. Buildings over four stories must be separated from the single-family homes on the west side of Valley View Road by buildings four stories or less to provide a transitional area between taller buildings on France Avenue and single-family homes to the west. Office-Residential Transitional areas along major Upgrade existing streetscape 12-3-0 60 residential dwelling thoroughfares or between higher- and building appearance, units/acre No current intensity districts and residential improve pedestrian and examples in City. districts. Many existing highway- transit environment. Floor to Area Ratio Per Potential examples oriented commercial areas are current Zoning Code: include Pentagon anticipated to transition to this more Encourage structured maximum of 0.5 to I.5* Park area and other mixed-use character. parking and open space linkages where feasible; Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a 1-494 corridor g case by case basis,subject to proximity locations Primary uses are offices, attached or emphasize the enhancement to utilities capacity,level of transit multifamily housing. of the pedestrian service available,and impact on environment. adjacent roads.Other desired items to Secondary uses: Limited retail and allow greater density or density on the service uses (not including"big box" high end of the residential housing retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), range above,would include:Below institutional uses, parks and open space. grade parking,provision of park or open space,affordable housing, Vertical mixed use should be sustainable design principles,provision encouraged, and may be required on of public art,pedestrian circulation,and larger sites. podium height. STAFF REPORT Page 8 PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment density reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposed density is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed density range is reasonable for the west side of France Avenue. The density proposed is less than what is allowed on the east side of York, which is considered a similar area, as it also transitions to single-family homes to the east. East of York, south of 66th Street and North of 70th Street allows up to 105 units per acre, nearly double the density considered here. 2. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, an arterial roadway that connects to both Crosstown 62 and 1-494. 3. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-125 units per acre...the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-75 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 4. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 5. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 6. Traffic studies done by Spack Consulting and WSB conclude that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. (See page A73 and pages A 142-A 19 I.) STAFF REPORT Page 9 • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment height reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposed height is reasonable for the following reasons: I. Height is typically a function of a Zoning Regulation and not a specific requirement in a Comprehensive Plan. Comprehensive Plans typically discuss height in general parameters, and gives guidance for allowing greater height than the Zoning allows as part of a Variance or Rezoning request. The proposed amendment could allow the City Council to do just that. Staff would suggest that the 2018 Comprehensive Plan follow similar guidance. All of the height limitations that are suggested currently in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan have been memorialized into the Zoning Ordinance with the adoption of the Height Overlay District. (See the adopted Height Overlay District map on page A5.) 2. The amendment would give the Council specific criteria to review when considering a project with height limits over four stories on this block. Below is the criterion: The allowed height south of 69th Street, north of 70th Street, west of France and west of Valley View Road could be expanded from 4 stories to up to 26 stories and 360 feet subject to City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD for a project that would include but not be limited to the following: a. Project must include affordable housing to meet the State requirement that 20% of the housing units be provided for affordable housing for persons that earn no greater than 60% of the area median income, and with respect to rental units, the rents for affordable units do not exceed 30 percent of 60 percent of area median income. b. Project must meet the City's affordable housing policy. c. Project must provide underground parking. d. Project must include public art. e. Public enhancement of the sidewalks around the perimeter and through the site must be included in the project; including a 50 foot setback from the paved portion of France Avenue and 30 feet back from 69th to include sidewalks and green space. f. Building must be of high quality architecture subject to review and approval of the City Council as part of a rezoning. g. Project must include sustainable design principles subject to approval of the City Council. h. The development must adequately respond to the Greater Southdale Area Guiding Principles. i. Project must include public space. j. Project must include accommodation for bikes. k. Buildings over four stories must be separated from the single-family homes on the west side of Valley View Road by buildings four stories or less to provide a transitional area between taller buildings on France Avenue and single-family homes to the west. STAFF REPORT Page 10 Conclusion/Recommendation As this is a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the City has complete discretion as to approving or denying this request. (See the pyramid of discretion on page A6b.) Below are the alternative actions to be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council: Denial Recommend the City Council deny the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Denial is based on the following findings: I. The proposed height is too high given the proximity to the single-family homes to the west. 2. The current zoning standards would require a building that is 360 feet tall to be setback 2,160 feet from the nearest single-family home. The proposed buildings would have a setback of 410 and 440 feet. 3. This area west of France is considered a transition area between the high density commercial development on the east side of France and the single family homes to the west. The-proposed height is too tall for this transition area. 4. The density proposed is too high for this site. Approval Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: y The density in the OR, Office Residential Area is increased from 30 units an acre to 60 units per acre. The allowed height south of 69th Street, north of 70th Street, west of France and west of Valley View Road could be expanded from 4 stories and 48 feet up to exceed four stories up to 26 stories and 360 feet subject to City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD for a project that would include the following: a. Project must include affordable housing to meet the State requirement that 20% of the housing units be provided for affordable housing for persons that earn no greater than 60% of the area median income, and with respect to rental units, the rents for affordable units do not exceed 30 percent of 60 percent of area median income. b. Project must meet the City's affordable housing policy. c. Project must provide underground parking. d. Project must include public art. STAFF REPORT Page I I e. Public enhancement of the sidewalks around the perimeter and through the site must be including in the development; including a 50 foot setback from the paved portion of France Avenue and 30 feet back from 69th to include sidewalks and green space. f. Building must be high quality architecture subject to review and approval of the City Council as part of a rezoning. g. Project must include sustainable design principles subject to approval of the City Council. h. The development must adequately respond to the Greater Southdale Area Guiding Principles. i. Project must include public space. j. Project must include accommodation for bikes. k. Buildings over four stories must be separated from the single-family homes on the west side of Valley View Road by buildings four stories or less to provide a transitional area between taller buildings on France Avenue and single-family homes to the west. Approval is subject to the following findings: I. The proposed density range is reasonable for the west side of France Avenue. The density proposed is less than what is allowed on the east side of York, which is considered a similar area, as it also transitions to single-family homes to the east. East of York, south of 66th Street and North of 70th Street allows up to 105 units per acre, nearly double the density considered here. 2. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, an arterial roadway that connects to both Crosstown 62 and I- 494. 3. The densities are consistent with those contemplated in the Great Southdale Area Study. 4. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 5. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 6. Height is typically a function of a Zoning Regulation and not a specific requirement in a Comprehensive Plan. 7. Traffic studies done by Spack Consulting and WSB conclude that densities of 60 units an acre on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. 8. The amendment would give the Council specific criteria to review when considering a project with height limits over four stories. 9. Public benefits in allowing building height over four stories would include: significant contributions to the city's stock of affordable housing units; high quality architecture and overall development; increase in public space; added green space; significantly pedestrian friendly developments; increase tax base; catalytic development for future high quality STAFF REPORT Page 12 development in the area; public art; elimination of surface parking; and underground parking. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density to up to 60 units an acre in the OR, Office Residential District, and allowing height to be increased to up to 360 feet subject to future consideration of a Rezoning or Variance for a project that must include all the findings and conditions listed above. L•gend 1 IDR-Lowlensity Residential OR-Office Residenial -RM-Regional Medical LDAR-Low Density Attached Residential-0-Office -OSP-Open Spate and Perks r ^.MCR-Medium Density Residential -MXC-Meed Use Center ®PSP-Pubic/Sem-Pubes _ _ __ ®I-OR-HO Denaly Rendenle -CAC-CommuntyAcwly Center 1 I EAH-UmbedAccess Hdtway -NC-Neighborhood Commercial -I-Industrial ,, ----- ,.. © ate, IIDR L 4 -` c log 2 12 6 35 1:11 .6th St dM�J 8 telt O I 12 2 � � 3 5 ;I OR 1 4 * A.A.,... lc 11 t W 691n SI (2 I .a YYyetast —3— i ill _ W, 41 i oi i / Cl...: o 4 Le ti Height Limits 4 o I2 2 Stories:24' 0 3Stories:36' x ` 4 Stories:48' t E 5 Stories:60' 8 Stories:96' st 9 Stories:108' A Eit'jf.jt s �*, w' 10 Stories:120' Parklawu Ave HDR °I ": 12 Stories:144' .. D 2 Standard Height HDR s Podium Height �" ".��� IDR 'a+ ,p ` 14 ` a , sh v:, 12 Of iiii\OR z 2 w non st m OR \ „,,,e!,:ri.rf:',;:.,.04..!,:7:11,1rit,1.1.,. s e nneeota D ,OR t 12 e O ,,, EI ,� rr1ingtori i Future Land Use Plan with `'' "� Building Heights .,�°n City of Edina r.) Southeast Quadrant _ 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figure 4.6B Data Source:URS 0 o 0 5 Mlles *Height may be increased to six stories&75 feet if "' podium height is utilized on York and Xerxes subject to review and approval of the City Council. •if 4 _ 7 1,241!.41 .4( ,' ? @ *re` , ,4 a g ,- • Q ' ^ —77 a (�,',5.srr•'. 4\t, 1 sir-17-10 ',4..'. , 1,1 -$i 'i i ir, r, - i i i 'i, - =„4„. •.= .,- -; 74 '12 "„"*4 , ..'°: ^_ w ❑ qa .. & -fie L ' "* • ir '..1 * LMY 4 e i .T tit �.( r�`� (r 1 yT T" ` ' Ir V Yr % ,te d L- ¢¢c... "" "k .11 in�. r" Y � t \i. \i .- , 0 L— i p�ryy W • dx•, ' 11 �y� '""' if ' �} • ,.)J* , . 1 RYk@.k" @II t 11 99 4 i fie „}, i t� q yT g .. 1 0 ` i YRYF@ q � • t 1. s , T •. � j L - i. ' s ....._:...,.:.. ...n, 3 �,;a,4> fix, .4 Y,- ile -""- P r ,-- - .itl , -------' LI+, ',( 6,,, ,..,'' ' I 5.;:f1-1. , ...., kiii r=La Y "'9 .,> w4 i0.@A@ ,�is.,,Y, ,t, t@ • '♦ ice X:. •}"" .4::::." s tit C. 33a3_.. , ', "x t AF 1 4* `e. @@ .1—','•«!: 7 ..j wt Get -i i: , ,„, ,. „:„.,vor .../ '....,, , , . .4 --:`,44-""^40 , .t, 'j .:.,,ra,--, ,. ,. ..vr, ; , -:,-. .,,,,:,:,,, ,,,p .,. ,z-,--_-1,— ...;:„ .----p„,,,,, ... 4 ',Lim , ill*-- .- , •,, t. •• ''''. -. . __, , • ; a ai3 y £ y n 5 t - .. . @k K 4,•, jt° 40 ''--.--4'0,-, 7 1,4 •04_ ,„,„,. „.,„, t,-- ii, ,\--,„ ,i4.0,„), / -,..netip,,, , . ; i—A ' = q 1 1 4 .''‘.7 c A- < < ...0 ‘te, 4 .:,1.,,,,. .* - ,....,--„,.... : ,,, ,,< e`:f%---.. ! "<.. ......< ..< 1, 1-- . -1..d „it, -,...,,, „...e. t , 4., 7 4:t° 7 - s.,,,,,, V *V*-, ,," ii,..,„,$=,,'*'''' -''' '.....'„‘ .r.st,_ rirt-i - -iii • `' fir."'y. 6 Ct W`„,,. a3 at"i° ��,+ 4-Ci 'vT`.'4 titi, f ,� (0 iiciiiK, ii Is � f�� t aL LTi°;-- ,,,,,:-* t4t - ' ,.,r ,,,, 0, , .. .2. v k� 'ii ! e "R_ ` •�' , 4 ,,,,, .1 .. ._ ,,, , , i.rY rw .. t�* "+, :„.. , , ; } F six ' ; ** x e 'dg ' .�. ♦ � �� - Elsi @ L_ ,,,,„ , • ,- A :101;71iaj • ' - ' -H- * ' '.. I. '4 '''• AL ' (..,.- 1 -4:::47? I ' : .`.g:'''•.•,' -' 4 1 r, ' '*'. Ii%4 • ,,v.,01' , /•• d' ' • • ,-45 .11 r•-' • -1 • ""1.11 • * ., "--. " lt,!, i;'-' A 0 ' 'f '',.° - *: *art '' '.• -,,,,e,t*,... a , - 7 ,) 1 ' . I '''' . • : , 40l 1 4 i a c: ,.. ,, . , ‘4 - . ''• 1 ' - ''' •IF '' ' 4 ...‘,„... . re66, .,-,N, ? y ilr ,.... ... Agt CD ',0•1', p .. t - .. , _ - ,. _, ,•, • , or - -• , , . ,_ttai, io 1: 3,- , i , . , ' - i, ,, -, •-•,' p' ' \K 4.v. .......r -." I .--„-„, _„..,.._ .04...... ;- --r„;?' -.--0 -• - , -:--,.."' ' 0 '- I. :44i 4.C. -S1 'S. ' '-' ...:1.4.'. *f ii,utr.;ft "191r".i - ' .. • '- •-•!, il ,r•-- -41',.,' ' ,_...„,„:,—;'.. .7*- -'-•i'' ' i 44-'-` 7 At 1 it 1-(71 • , t,—,,.. -4:,, , ok, ...gc• ,.„.., k,t,'t ,7' - ',--.4,,::,•""4: ,,', tt' - v.: , .. .. —„. ,,,, ,. .,e't:' IF - i ',*4,1'S'''''', - * 41;6•41:'. '66,..--IIA Itoio,:•$, : * .• :1 ,,.." ,! ? /.. , ..' :4**"""166% '.1 ..6, +.+•:..."-i 1$6.66,Y''''''.6666."-'e . ' 6 4r,I , ,' •,0 , ' . • Flft k 1 .,. 1 '... Li 1 irt , , ..1}', N.:, ; ,., •-.„,...,._ ,,,,,,,, .AO 4.- ^,,,,,,, „„! ' .„... „:,,,,,,,:,.."t .., 41141$ .--.1 ' „, \ ',./ , t? Ng.z f' ''''0,-. ,°„:424''' '.'''el.,t.' •.' :'",'.' + ' ' s -1 iiii,, ,. ,., , , .„ „,..... .... .....„...,".„„..,,,, „,,....4 .‘44.,' ,,,,,f...44•4r4,• ,,,4 , .. ' * / --. Aiiiies ri ,•/ 4 ylk •‘, - .• - ' - ,. I I 1 •- si-,;.'' 4 1 • , • ,,,,..... 4. ', • . . . i.4° ' ' .,' ----- ki''..-. ': '' . ''''' *.' /'''.‘*:,7.4. .•'.'7..:- ''''''-•, , ..t',.-:. , - "' ..., , 141f ,,,,' .- . it ,- — ' -C ;' ' - -iy,, . ... ..., ..,, , 11+-1 L- - CO •ssi,,,,...; .= U-1 ,... \,. .•,.., '• '''. t • .,-;:';',.'''..•-, '' . i',tilt!.'s•, '4 \ •if : ~.-..-..-,,,, ti:•,,,ij,t4....,..1 IN ,Ii. I w i \\'' 1 ., 0) ,,, . ,,,,, , ...‘........,,, _ ,...., _1: .f ... ..N...1.4.:t 664 i ,, , •- mt.. ..v ' \,,,,'• ,,...:,-...„.. ..... ,,,,,, 0 .'i,., ..,,.: "ty.. t,., - , 1'4..dio.: ‘ 4 '; - . _.•-'--- -.Or A -1/4„,,,••-•0:,y,,,,,,..,-,,ri:'‘,,,-„4-.„•=.7...f.',v-.4;4. •-. 'i••.',-,•.• % ': „,.-i. - ' '-•-.i•,-, , '''....:..woi--. .---:- ''' ,f, , . 3.. 1... t,.....-,'.5' ' ''.1 t,i • ' 1 i , .. . ,,,,,,,,,, 4?i ,„„d, :. 1 -1 ? '''.-": A'' , .4.4..- ' ' LL''' .. ,iii. ,. „,,H . - ' . . .:,-; -'.i-i.1, __,...re.4- . ,,,, I P.' '::: .''71 V ..;771.11-14 -'- *'* 7 ''':. 11).irni".7. j'". .1;*: 0.4".4444- ---"'N LI' .:,'c',-v.t\i,\,,,.,, 1.. •55,"4.,vS:55552.' ' - 1 1!: .;-.:'.7i!,;.•,:.:,,,..:4 ..,) ' i:44.4. '.;,.:4.1 fr : :',„.,....-;,:,,, _ - . ,,, -..4-ti- - • 0 ',"..: ioi; • , 1;'' i '64,'' ' i L •' . '''' *M ; Ok, , .A. 14",:- •' .......,:j.„-:i: 1 • ''.., - --- • :"U , I: . . ,-- U i ...... ... . e',..i. '..•-rW".,..%11,- ,..-'6.,..t . ,, .- , , -'.7:41,: ., •. I .,,,_ ...,,, - _ V,: , . , ,* . : - ,'; I--*'ar •• 1.1 , • * • ;' i•' • •-1 i -4',1 ' ...1 . e, i : '-'..'"'.., , •-:.i',,' „ r . ,;„:.,,, ...,,,,,. ''..-, 1F . • 71- 4 : .: •-• . ' ; . .. 1 „._.,: ,i ., ,..,' r',,-:', ,, ,' . , *::--ii,*:::..7, :'-:""; ''' '":.*1'.,. •'',.• , •,.-..,...j,,, ' ..7,'' ,; r , .',-, -......7';..... , ,,r,f. !, -,,. b - t ,.'' •••.:4,t':' ii_ { : iki,.1,,,.. io, .-,i-: „.....rt- ',..,' ' '•‘ 4,':-''::*:- ' ':' - 4:'. .2'0”, - 1 ;Irtlieli* 4 . . . em " 1 e, ,i, .„,,....,. . ' .- 1 i _.: :1- 7,'"; • . . ..-- -Y, „,,... , 'V i, c''.'.•, i)4 , , , ..-at..'- , . '•; _. . .. .'-; .7,, • .Kt$4,-. 6.,.. - • —. . „ 4V- - ipi! ti,,.:. __i__....,_.___ :„.:;;;. ....„ '] 14, \ it. • r It 001*4\4 , ,. ...,.:,• 4 . . -- a‘ ' •- r. ' ';.'',.:-.,-;• .; ,. .. lit, ! •••,....7a,,,;,,, ,.., . .'': . ,--, I .,t, . _ ' - - .-'!.-"•,' 16 vir,...__.,„, - ' ---: •-: itt/ 4.1.; 5,- - .• 1 4.% 1 '•. , ' ''.-' '''• I - ‘P-' . '''','-- '•:. 'f• PO 'WV) Lai••% 1 ....4 „..... ,,.... .. - - . -, 4.4°'• _.,,,..... --.< .-t*5,11 e.4;,- L,...'.. .' " ' •'' ' ,5"5" ' . - •:,'" : •• . ''"•-r7-. - . 4. , , / ,, , .- ,: . .•,kt !, .t...11-,4bv.ittp,. . ''. -:-. - •,::!...f., ,..,-- L'., - • - - ...i 1 :-;-•:- , . 1. 1 1‘,4-,, -°.'''....." .- :4' ,, 41-;..--.-.., .Nit -''" ,':=4.:...•..,'-'-''*. 4 •.,--' '' I'le-i'..1'',„,•'-.1"-'7.--4-c''i * l'" ''‘ '''''' , ( .,,-, , -'-..,;.:„,-", .7- -.2,,??ii !,,-.,,, - 'A.-''.'r ;,,, '7,,, e ,,,4,,,r.oti,,,.,:,,, L: 2.'''',.41', ,."'!,,,' ,,.., :4: •---', ..,.0.,'..', 7.,Si ',.n -' i'''':'''' -1'''',"•,./'''. .,:.,-..... 1 :''''4--•,• .;:''''''''"....... •' 0 *: • !,-4` . r -•'4`'4;' : '' '. • *' - ' "•-• . _,,. . .- '4, i4 *-':- "--• . 1; I •,17' .-.. t,:.'4.'""--..-:,iii;wwi :-, -, Y.'7;,,-.' '. i _ , ..„ • _--- .>••-'2 '•''.;:,:l ' ' •• L.,,,..-,,• . . =-- ---:;;- . •-:*,-, 1:.'-'7'.",:'''.. .' -'-- *,7-- 4,45,te,5..,,:,...,44:5 5•4•'• 4.-4 '-'-?) . !'i'''''''''.15 -5• - --. ' ' -LL-1." ' ' -_-.4.„......- ... .---__ • jler.,,, '• .L...,.„ Alia-444.P44''554.'5. -,. 15*-4 Q',,,,,. • : 0,- 'SI, ', ;".. '' = i'.: .' ' ':4- . .„-„,,,,p.... ,,,,ot. ,,, ,.., ...,,,,„ V".74 * , ' ' ,...i5 ts:'5..- --,..:44,1•L_ .. .:‘,, !4:.4 7:, ,..,..--.1i-4; - l'-* ,,,,,..,........,,, , i „, . - -,..•. ,•';'...-. ': - , ,,,, .„-.-,. ..;,:,.. -;:': :' --...,.,..'',',.. •."--: 2 -'77: ,..::,-- ,.;:'-' - '."-• •-t!.4.::1t::-..,,:"'ej ..,- 400iiir, ) ...ta„,,,,, pi, ,, _ .„., t--0, .,.„.,,. - lk, •... -..--. ,,,,,„,, . . ,...* - , ; , ..,. -:--..-91i, -- „-.., . — • '.. :,•-• 1 _,.. (f) 4 ...z,:,.. , 7."..V, - - 4, •. ' . 5 ;,•.•,' . .,!„." '• -1-'q2 , '-•- •-•.,...•5 , 44. ,4%, , ..'.44,4„.... • , 4--.-1,..., • L. i...1.„ .• ,...,„ .„, :... . ..... 4h 7 ''",..' ,..-•..!.'•,• . ''''...0 ''...4.. '"'" ... ''i'' ' • ',.., ''...i • ' ' 'S.—•,„ %.',..(4,,, . lik ,'....„ .p s, ,., •,. •. 1. ".04,.7 . .....,ii , , 4 ':'• . .64 • . . , ' 04. 5 .‘54.'15 - L L ; 'L`'..5,.. •44,y - ' f;=.• • : ' ..i. ' 4.4. , ,. '11''' .4... ' • . .‘148„A.,,,,,' ''. ". '0,44,41 .'4•W' 4. - '`A, ,t.....- . \,,,, 4, ••-k , ,, ':'• , . :-.1:-• . 4,,..--q„,., .. -.,.--- ,,), .--,,4 : .- L..• .4 ,,,,,..: „„, w •,. , -4, •,-?.., :'''''1',.. ,..10.:,:, ' '- -••:*..: :...„ :1 . ,ilt,,,,,,6_..„:. . - . - i i wa/ ''''V, ......., , . ,,,,,,d : ,:',,, i . ---! ..- . :L., - ,... : •*0 1,.. ., ,. '.,. 0 4 :74-.7.••:, ' Ilk. iiitl L. ' Ait - .. .AL . • - 4'. . k•NV ' . . :I, ''''..., ' .i "1 I, .2 -.'. . ', •- sku.• , t',.' . ' ' ' ',,,„ _'.a•.. '. :. • E E w oR i! !' 111 v k M" i» z+m a€ ar >K ell Ey, E° E E° E° E° Eu a i= aN 9s` c -j _ _ a 5 a ha' a M .,- b . O Na i, g I- O ❑ O 6 ❑ p p = O O Q O p ❑ U o a = 3Atl M31ANOO119 2 2 2 2 2 = ,- - g m a 3 .. w 3Atl NMtlINtl• �� I � � a - 4.V h o 3Atl 99011 :r�.. 3Atl Ntli13 F W 3 F J m F m w it w 3Atl3 •LK•.•1 _ -" LL m " 3ONtll13 > 3ntl xv3nvH3 m Fria .g LL m r t J IN .Mid a. Mgt - ,�, A.. ...` _ IAB■■ di J riii.z. _ k. __, ,) - 44,15 .711-kjr= 112 i. Jam /, 1 �_� aw a -w 1 m ❑ 3nV 3�NI .. ',, I� I FrAnagal --MAII NIP m CVO Ispastes,,?,, g2�s - - • _ .- _ - - - ._ MI c 4� . r _ r �li, CD cVQl' - = :a c K _ ( i 01 W 'ate .. _. _ - ;'. ' _ ---' m U = Q CD 001 6 QQ iOIShOC -� ❑ w wI ~ 9Y 0h , � ,ii O m y OMTIIHYO mb�m ( ' SOj c Obprf 1`4 wm � 001 AMH i _»-ae !_i Vl M31AONtlH9 '? tl, a 2 ; c . l' F4111 a, g . 1 -, - • i 1 ';' 3 i t . i 0 i i I • 1 : ! 0 ' \,, I tz;,it _ _ II1L1:11_1131_11_i , .. . 1 .:, tl .___-- Fj 1'4 lli..-1 -FR IIF-T--- L] - AC: < F* IIII 4su cr:II Ll[11 i'l t ---1J_n. ...Tali:, ---i--- _,A, .., a 11111Wii ') ,.. ,,,, P1 Its) 4 ,.., I ftor ovi P 1 in 4 vu,al a a lielliC-, EF i ."-72 WA 11:11D3 n 1 ( . ii V.4 4Z t .4.4 - - [ 14) as, E iir. .-= z ^ „ ,,,..„ .„....e• r. , ,,, doir . f6 ..., WA!it> =,''''' - -7.'"0,54,4--v----- --_7_, •.-.S> 1 tVAIBL_9 .„ -?..,. ,...... ..- o as - u) o 441 a c . .- CL c 17$ C liN1 -1,1, g . ..() N 6 a a • \ 2 =ill Gli c ..:: 1 i ..,.,•••” ,C3 EP c LTi I,- 1----j- .t. .. --H / -.... ,, : i 'E' /1•Iii_,,,..,s, _ 't ,,,,,,..._ ','. ,s--, ...".. .--;_______ cr.. g'' -1"' --tn'&I'-', -4 ,,' 2 ; ___F-= ,r,i n 2 1 . g - ---- tHitl Fr. EY Ell Fi Mail 4.,...:.°-.:•, 1' finE ail LIE ., MINNESOTA STATUTES 462.355 ADOPT, AMEND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; INTERIM ORDINANCE. Subd. 3. Adoption by governing body. A proposed comprehensive plan or an amendment to it may not be acted upon by the governing body until it has received the recommendation of the planning agency or until 60 days have elapsed from the date an amendment proposed by the governing body has been submitted to the planning agency for its recommendation. Unless otherwise provided by charter,the governing body may by resolution adopt and amend the comprehensive plan or portion thereof as the official municipal plan upon such notice and hearing as may be prescribed by ordinance. Except for amendments to permit affordable housing development, a resolution to amend or adopt a comprehensive plan must be approved by a two-thirds vote of all of the members. Amendments to permit an affordable housing development are approved by a simple majority of all of the members. For purposes of this subdivision, "affordable housing development" means a development in which at least 20 percent of the residential units are restricted to occupancy for at least ten years by residents whose household income at the time of initial occupancy does not exceed 60 percent of area median income, adjusted for household size, as determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and with respect to rental units, the rents for affordable units do not exceed 30 percent of 60 percent of area median income, adjusted for household size, as determined annually by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. til-‘19k Public Discretion in the Land Use Process Bldg Permit o Site Plan 000 0to Review 41 C.U.P .U.P / t LtoQ U'C41 Variance :°% nPlatsfsubdivisions 11-5.d.94‘-5o0v) .('-'; „ � a ZoningAmendment . ., ik Comprehensive Plans Roger N.Knutson Campbell Knutson,P.A. 860 Blue Gentian Road,Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 189640v1 2 A 6 1 . . .. ..,. "Ir* 'd: • (,;-_--:, , .,.. .......t-4,44!,' 4! . ., , . .11 ,,, 'r, , ! ----c-• tr-: , - , , , -- 31 , l'h:' ''':: • I) ' l - k r > . ., , •.•• , . r ''::'' " ': : • 44;'•':'Ts'*;' 'Or:," r • . : +rim) • ..:" CO .....-"I 65,"•1,1 .:;Za-i,:rE:1-7,MT..V"- i 71,,-'., ' „',1..„•;,ti.: .,„ -----,- '''•-•our- '-ig.••• .T.A.-... -. '-'''--.'" ' Low : nla4iii . ,,.. „.... . ,. ::-.:IL "",,-•,--7•:".:^'-1=7.1,"",-rf"..7.,"";,77" -Ct. " :: ,,,,, ",kr "*1- ' CO .... ,, , .",..!‘r"-- '' 4:"--:".4"W -"' :4' 'NW , • :- ,‘" ,•"., , 1,I:, ",' 1 J.'::;"''' :t ; ,Y,s, '.:4iii:::::--': ...... 1 ‘•,1, 'Vt:•*1,•, l .r. 't ' .....:... ...... .... ' „ .., ,, . ., . „,„.....,....-. „ ,,: -- - - - ...,..,,.. ..-.., _.,- •. t...' ::-....-...-0.--,..-----7-,-......,..,..„,,,,,,:.„-'..-..-=', ''... .• '''',,7-"--". •..'., .-•,-..'", .- U .., .. - ........,... tt 4, ... „:,::: :;••,' . ' (1) • -:r ft ,,- ,.ram;stag r Ls liE --,•...z.--- -: -, - f'-',..E; ::::cetaaerr „:44;4-,0,,...‘„,... ,," .... ..„4, ,,•!, .„., ' ''IR' •, 1 ' - ' •k .1111 1 •_.,,, 0 r..,( . 1..._ . •,,agera - aeg....4w . CL !: ;A r • ,.. . „. .., . , ,,‘.,,.,,:,.,..,,„.,..------'- • ... . , . ....., ..441. ,•i.... :7 •1 .11M -..r. ow,• ' . • r--- = • ,i.. , - , . , Tp g • ' 4 4 '4 ' '4,;f''.4'4 4,,,4'40''',, rr) ,,„, r- . ,:f. , •;., :,, --, ,,,,,,,,,,,„ (I) - ,• ___ c, . Nvia,„ • „ (I) E ..,.., ! -A ,a) ,. . , -, .. . ., ... ( -1, J) a_ •.4.4_ Ell, •' 1: ,,, . '''444•.'•.. '''''.1 qt. ". •Y4' .. •' ,,' • , , ."•• 1.-•••;;1' a''' I •'-..f.;‘);1:;.•''',',4:1t. '..... ' LI] (Cni) •,4- ' .. ',,?: r."'MP . .4..''' .1';'....;;71'..••.•t)4:.:1••• '., irtia,_. '.'-'''•;:•;*.ilt4,i'.4•:'' ---'-: -',, „-,-;.;-.,!,; 7-:,'.' ,:,,!•,. • • ,. ., -.—•,.. '; Z . ,,,,,.. --. .,-...,,c.,,, .r.,'''..-1,4,''.,:j.e.. 1:.- . '4'1' . ::: •'t...-. - ,,, :z.„ :..,,;-:--4.-.!• r,:.,±, ••''". - . Nr" ' ....---..,--......, --- . 111111111:1111100011. 'F'r''' 4L. 0 -- -. ...., .4 =,,•'..,,....7•:. . .' n... ;101!' ;dr... ,..4?' .AT-----_-.0-" -- ! .,:. ,•.! !,.. . ,,., ' , ,,,,•, . a t• !I!,!, ,,,,;„ ,, ...----!!!!,'","5"mfMr72,77,-.,,, ii:c,44,:ii ia : F1 .- ---, , r ; -- 7-4 „ f - / . • —....-.1 , , / /' / -I .0 ..,4 - . - . -,.....,..„:01,-..-.--_,..- ,..._.t./.A , .......,„„;,-..,.. ,, 3,-,' Vie 41V ,, ... • •, , i N ii`., r _ . , , S I fc- � A r t. . ..&""" a) CO 3 a« 'U CC N Om Z.c L dp E X m c m? T= 7 .O « C LEa) C2W U .n y UN o VL 7 _. (2, 252 = E2 O 0 ?of Q)Io o u u 'O 'O Od a)dar •L U cNno aY W 7 am °L O L O O ° aoma E 'c L uc a m w` n cr m r E a u 0 c m> c m g mp m o o m oo ° c ai my1S 0)Om Cuv auo aca . . m uO ui .1) -2 ' 0 = ' cw = ovZm25, w '0 o -8 -o o o ° c„, '§ a as c '� — cx a, aTc0 m AEEa ~ ; .ag vI- 'Oovo ac m ° o > uVN C y 7U !.1-- oOU c z t L ° alJ4V CO ° C °QN L RO i "' 0 ua a 'p c 2 _, oc o ° cd oa w ° Q ° d -,2Yav°) O' 'OC ; O .� EOm L £ r °' NC L u O oH0Orn L L C E _c 0 > L v) o n u 1 u CO m u aZ 3 m f ac P. Cjtn 1.) t 3 c wc t g.d. ° uua " cc ° O 2 a E F .°P N 0 F2 aw u a°N • 8. r a 3 4; o L u ?a m N o '5cC N oa N . o a N C '5 E. NN n w e-.9- h C Y c a T= :w •C amTS .� - H Y ° a dL cqna c m0 3 y 1u .a m o o E. c o ucQav ° 5 0 ° 4 N �, o � a at amNu NZzCc - No c mo N C , C C ae/ d t , cc oQ wC m c 92a a c m W m w 'O V NW d aO S 'inv O C7c O i5 c , "° BW CLa o °O O N 0 u - N a U N o g_1 O °' YmcwcEv u Z arF0Uop Qm . co = a.E v ° -° L a v E « c c Eo r ao C aw ` a, .„0 vrn o oa sv r c ='Wg am di Y v c 0 u 3 ii c y c °O cN ° 1 > '° Y 0 C Y 5ag- 79 .O C2 2, o Cto -0 N o c u• EE t ° lv 4n,--,2y , m § vE 0, ,er lt °^ a = m v cEt a omo a ° m0 mo n c o ° n Ua ov aErn E 0 :8200 .-cwa a 3 = ovw b ° c o a w a o 0 O O 0 02 O O0 0 0 0 0 a, • 41 t 0 :5 Lal0 ,; , , .. •-, -:; ,,, Aitt.,,fAcj';,,,,,Altr. - , •�,I,i ti ;� I-. 'j',4 rpt•. .4 ...4,,H,,, .. . littr-:'. : .... 4." 144,! 4 , ., .:14,,,,-. ' , — -,:.......:- ,„ ,: „ -„,... „,„4„,,,.,.. .. , • ,,,,„ laki‘.. „.• . . .,.,„.........,. ,, -,,,tikui-- •-• - ,. --, ,,:,,,,,., , ..-:=,.. ..,',-,_ ,,,.-„,,:,..„,,,,, • _ , ,... • .. , „ . ...,...._ ..,„ ... ,,........ .. . . ----- --------14iIIE ,— ; ,..-- ' ,� , t',,,,e1-4,•14...,i �,: ,,.: , .1.i,Ii ' w .• i„ E ' d ;F-41 ate- _ -- - e ""..-*:. , a ,;. , • ":': s.. ' 1 w S /mi�S "•". •V, ass V an .0 5 ' a) c a, O :,15 11,1 t YC O Cpm '' Cii m O .0.° .smg„7 Y Y m V0 c 7 N � a t cc a 3 yO o E X c 0) 0 0 m c y 0 c mvc L cc t )Qn 0 .0o f -0 d E c a EHz• 'a a 2 `= a, o 01 op v c c a ot0 0U K. O� c E d - acao ;m gc ao > mC 'TvQ w > U) 0 0 °- ro du > > d a = vE .0 vm . vl > .y u .§ - Ome, A a a) o R myVOp C O XfCa) 'OO ? ' .+ mVCrCNCO O 0 O O 0 a 15, =` 2CO0jUX > O O C m 0 b n ;2),,, p c 0 f'.. 8 43 ma « o 'S Vam s EQ m w C vE c ° c Y O W . 0C > U) vO) a a)3 u ad smON C a) N p3WC Y Au) O yn3 4` O u ` 'O Z. aV, s av) F. C CO « OT H O C t / NC w .OC 'Cfir,' O N O « - - Ni uV, T,N O O Y sO (n NOZCoa VUV ojr L > C NU O p O ? C 0 lLN > d ) a 1 O 1 E ` C Em s v Q CZ03 00 0 omc .v >a 0J E O O a o O y y0OO2 V 0) al N N O N O En Oi1 C Y � p V01 yNCY "O m "O O � 2 OC O 0O� O NONONNLLNoa vU, 4' f. stO N ff., N u .-. - s c uu 2 c OE O av.+ Ec04, r CO ? d Ym o oE E Vs 0 C0 ° o a Cl ` m L -•3 a -c c 0 a U, ='0 m vi -O )p t0. N -p o a c v) ' 'o. c c E ` c a, m E v w a 3 a c E w m ' _oo o y o 3 3 .52 o C a-. C m m O V a a) N c >O N 3 d '00 L E r2 C O ai C V m O 0 a y ,,, N m O O N ai y w ; rn ti Z � 3 o _iu C o m 0) a d ,°n , c m U` 3 a ° E o E m c a m Y m .a a, r Q r o c 171 a mc .- �- EY mrc0 =" cc cc c 0 r auc o rn a, omy °° o c s y aiLo ct F aA v a OCFa T c .t ) E3C -5 N a) T 0 0 E a, °10 c 0 1 a, C2 mn0 m e a mv " m c -cd (.9 > 2 To ON _Laa a Na' Y O V Oa Ear '�W VOa ) CVC OY a N«• : O .O y O v m "Os a06 LLp .a JyoL2 ua, N .0 -s8 Nno N FN 2su18 U OC O .o > Y cg a] , OcmDaN a) a) 2 a L � C `° y Q J a) m s) RNmacwasG V a ao a . To aU -oNt`Q -oLWO )07o a, ; a)) o Cd C z., r 2 .0 ,, 2, N -p V O 4 N65 `,w 0coONc ANO 02 C N a,. EN QNO ) NuO w x C ONa N Q> N I- u L aO = c Y NC ,. rCn0WE0c o a ca OUaoo a) o0Z w S N o rnm0 aac aZ L c o c y O fo ( a y c E) im s 2 Dd N v u ‘5'O . -o O a, t5X sU) C m 0 O a) v -C t) O I' m F- m ELLvW t- Ds 0 a a t",. c 0. '04I ICO t ! 1c`4 4 a' 0 4 W ix ' 5 t ' I' ' # e, j I ' q '' R *.- x / > 5 LL yy^yy*Y�JF f Ili 5 f" S 4 W ,y Ia ¢ L7 N o -O3 C T Wo Ey 0c v o y v o L o gC "8 P. w a) V fa Q w e Qa L• C 07H• v n7 LN u F- c E ac c w ` • m ti') „C,),' y l' v m E v o v 4 m `o « ' o ' v t Z c om `; > � o i C.9 w 3 U a TN8wa 5C a O GO O a= L O N a .. N D O OV CI N C O O1• O NpCuo >. d Oi C a! N a GNz w Y 0 v m ` m 2 -c c -8 d E N 0m 'C U > ww md L m O CC _- O C O O aN 8 uVv1 -O T ixad am ° m ui" -o ° r C 0,, u Nu vm W D (..D ' N Y L maa0 mc i, a c i a 3 % O N y N = N 4Q N Nu W '-- mEaCm y ,, ' E L+ O uv a°, N rg C Y g . E. '5 ooo . m uCx0 Y 3o ° nzSo v - a 2 OW ON oC d . O m 0• C > > - - O • = O3 a. Nm ° ur - . ° o3 > 1- O � c oo v a) -o LnSD z a" tr6a . y �Ly� 11 741',1 1_.,,i,h10, -,....y. ) .,,t,,,:fle Li'1 Al ' , ..,Al ", F.rt-4.1d 4 t''. it 0.400',,,„47,-i.if„.,fL ,,,,‘,„..t?! ,,..:•,..,„.4.; IFfir,... .,: ',, ',-,..- i ,, V ",.rt". ..,,,, i gm ,,, •,, -.... . xY SF:1 41/'16‘6.',/'-',/.%',Ai. .-7-1. : L, L1 EL o w _ - , r t5tt� ice ; U LL" ~~ Ser ... o..-::r`.^ tom- .•...A. p,ti... r -' .,i&,... .. 1 7 •-- a 4.0`y] t '-'1" . e" vow g! t, . "-h•. (tea 4• iu 4 t.Fsa O ,a4j `'tf•''"i �� t.. ., .`` 2' ' T y `� . a El? .tee....__._ ,. � a ,. y o 3 + • .....err t E ° "'L''` eta. "fir 1?.. ��"" -- i '' a r r.—�- .. , ,T'1•l! t~l) up T Z U , - , 1 Ta c m> ° >u ° mv ooQ ° a m v umaaw12m• Cm = T 111 : 1 GscAO ` m0 .°IO C9 'mLr d ° 3 Vc avmvo 3 u c F o as X Ts > r 2 cov r E L aVc s o ) a) a Ow T -- E. d3 O m O a) � x C y .i--) u E (53 a Eaa (0.) Z. cc`ux . mcC 0 C N CO a _E _ O z, ut a 2 . a c a N N .2 m a u ° 5 mlO N a) a > O La d oNm E E 3; °n' '^ - E u E ° — -oa N a u a) vo u o r m `6smo m a > a ac 5 m u . m o C = 0 8 >, c - ° v c Fa v a) E o v .mU o u ` a)tN ma a Q a 22Eii Zi) E c a a o c m .c m v T ami mm m - v a m a Z, o u u � w m in m in 'u £ a) O a o' w > m C7 O m > > a c = v . • E . c c 0 0 U., 3 U 0 D a 0 c c mu m N N V V d m C U NN a N a) m C T m `p ti 2 m r 3 T c -0 O --- 13, o a U u$ a maCc NOm° ui vvcU) a6o Cm yav TN E a a v U vmto O E u m a m m o a U a) a c r r m _2 0 a '`'E') Z in v ° " E m Q r a 'N T T a v O 3 = C C9 m a O '6 'O m G1 ai O (/1 c o v v a u m aN .r.6.. N o Q N °� v E c a) a c >, E m > mj( o y ° m u m m ° W •O o Q 92 m ,- a a, C v N E Y a) a = a a) w 'a « c 7 a vm Z > N a u . a a• m U 0 ma a (.0 a O C .1 >, m 'O O • Al £. � . V •• X •• •N G Lu z d' m = Q IL —r 1 .v ■r, 1 1 - �m I' i is t i `� �� � 1•S � J' IIS 1 �� a i ), , ,alb ; I i' ■1 t` i. , -,,. /„- , ..,. ,I! !._ , f "d�-a" ali 4 r l : �10, �� p y41 ds 1 r �• o,„:„.„,,,,,,,,.......,7,,,,, ,, ,,,. .. „ ) Y ,, e ,(i.,, , ...."'4----, ,1:,,q,,,,*N.,„,14,.,,,y44.4 a 4" •\" xr p ti_ it s, .siw.+ Ifo / a;Ti f-, r"f ., m C E iciiC .-.§. N N '. !: tat; # .. ;,, a O a v eco 4 > pFt ^ t 4 o) la R f'i f ! f- v c m a .9 a, .hv �t t � 4z 16 m u co ° c E o f ‘ '. �►. o > Y L a, J.::..04 1 �.' m iiti 7 'f„ . co m C_ c V o t t �M1f1” J. c �, o . L Y a a • i a .7{ i . ....' '" ° E tT E -f3' a '- v '- E t 1�� t?R t tk E m co c > s r 0 0 0 > 5 a, -o t� �r P,, u R, m v v, ' -° � rj c 7, p E c v a w n fid` E.' T a u a r a ° �4� �f 4�Ca i o ° X N ° liii ° �w o c, c T , a, v E a j Y 3 a, v EA '7/2. c IHID o •ii" v..4'' // Ct`/ i�Iii \ ivcEm ° v 0cEa2 'auo � '° o , Ti� co c waa• E31E it o E V • o N V E p E O 'n m y F- / ✓ F- 3 c o m a, 3 i w e 1 4,`-r*, �iy4A 'c'a'' , c E 5 Y vi �- 'mo '9•;: :�4{�" \ rte C' ;I-)a 2 c E • ,-.4' '" „, i \'' 4- '''' U' o Y o m r o _k" v gig-` �, Y / \ • ' - ` - <- w S •- w $ o d o m3 3c m c 0@ mo L a, a, f um° ° ~ a3 d° 3 -oa u n t ° mc c8Evm ° ° aEoo -oLwE5vv t° ¢ o kpym = o a m WO c0 2C m > > . acrc a., a;c YVca cmvai t « oE stcc- u 3 o c in 5c y ° fl' ai E. 76 • T. a c E ° aDomeamt vO ov cu y Eva 2 rn y v °v yo $ do ° ar v= mE m •E ° ` r,,, wa, � - f 5 ,6 o c- T ° y ya m c m m -a.. — a, Tct . O0onE_ . a0 [ G.. r V N g c0c ° o amm C Sii; « E . U5. m mEm c `„ N c r7 Q V aQo. Lo OYo o C U ° m N o c0 o, d dQi wm mixF Um o r c a3d m 4.- a) m v m E L 2 °v •a, a •E «c -0am 2 ,72- 70 i?,- " o d ° t v E xcmc E u� ° ° > a E m 3 ` m v ° • c 3 z. a) a o N Ti., am >2 a u 0Nc rn a ° Sa c p m « � amNOdN UN LLR > VUVY, Oao TNd p• Y 'y a 17:,, Ec •cyr , m u O oo E m c m E '5 .c -o m ` U ic L o « � 12 L+4 o ` c c a, a m 5 L 7 V N o• mQsY U U o L a O 8-g LLO 'O .7o m m o 0) o = o ° ` � c € au7 O O Nu ; Ea as O. £, Ln a o n �+ c0 N f Y a v . ° a moo 0.) LL. a m w e •� aaYa, m o o d LE aco Fz 1- �o. co I ' I 73 i I m I Io I U I— 0 w 0 E E iL L11 N N c N 0 2 a _ a 1•7'. .c 0 s at r. 0) I I _ I I I I I 1 3fN3AV•3DN ?i3 1 lV' I I I _ I f ' � 1 N E E .2 , Eyz ', m ? — c a, 'cn c a, I aci - I -acWE �acoE m m a, a 1 N Q ' E E I 2 0 E o o Tr," o mE cU 1 U 1 0 Q) 0 E I �� I — o —3aVN3W0dd■1S3'M — — 1 / I i. / _/ a m 4 c .a `�, E 1 I o CD 0 E o 3 E U I • 3 w 0 1 • c ♦ 0 I m °bo 3 I g ,, y4t3/?1,,�� I 0 �_�81V 7lb1♦ I .4 e, ♦ 1 z ♦ ♦ W ♦ I 0 I ♦ ♦ J 0 m I 6 I z 022,o L c N c 0 r LL u � ° _ L a y c7,,,:. g c _ W . r O U N y L YO t0 N N N U � 'n -T-, � y 3 `/ i0 - C 2 N N ° VI N L_ Ul a' U Lll •V 7 ' 'O G 0 U a 4,3 O O N N V 3 O m 10 0 3 7 O. o E X O C N L 7 r� y N 0- - r : v 2 o E E o 0 c .. '� O c u 0 m a c j 0 O C 7 0 •O C O 0 y o Z 0 a) `y 2 c O N -O 0 0 C 3 O1 10 w .N N co 0 v a o m 0 ° c a'. F. c L 'u L m m v 3 0 Z N L E 3 d S 0. Y o u (X `: c O' E a in t •N O > y LO. W N O O X F W .t." c u Q d = d N ti 1 .111 ‘.2.41.4 ,o` - I • s • ._.- 1AI .,I�i i '.. 1 • s• •� ire" • * a W rillir •: 4, ,•• •�r 4 z 1 * s s '' ft' r ass s 1s 3 s •. ' il •vial 4 0 to I, , . s• 1- 1 • os • 1 , •+ . + 1- il, se R" (3 {2 4 67` '01 a0 a. IV _ d ' 1 : (n NP..,.., _ .". , , r 4,7, , A., 4 t _ ••••gr r eBr r p 11' ii. cW7 el W"' r. rrril t r h O Ca) N V E E C 8 .5 a a) 7 > O C c d V m — c 1n T O O c o a v E o •� o) > ' o a' 3 m c v c Q - "o a) 5 o -o a) c a) V O vi ,n _ C T, W E m > '" m Q 3 N E o o d N U 'c _S' .t-� p N c w U C E L m C O 'O U O O d U T 3 o 'O 3 G > v c C T a C a C n) a) o T v t m . 3 a) o f 3 c c E d a a� 0 3 Y d a > c u c > v 0 c y o w d a d a) ai - m e w w o a m o �- ~ > T U o N ai u > aci a) ~ -o co v ° in m °' u -O > E °c ° a 0 2 c Y a L„ TE c of o v a v TT) f > c3 T a c -) o c m Y 2 T O T., > d m ac -o Eo' o '� E t. arn cd _ cu- -° a) C' _ cd L St a gim E m N -o r m oc3u mEp H o c 2 E c m o goo ' E.. ° o 0. t - _ -Ot6 y E tE GN Oo LNE E a) E O aOOo O 0 2 C Nt% L N E N -0 .- o m i a o 0 m a o O) p o aNa a 5 u 0u a) - v a) 5 = 0 . 5 m a '0 13 d m . c -.E. c � E a 3 cLc 2 a a) o ° o ° 2 a n c t > L o 0 Qaa a •,, 5 a 7 Nc T -E -O O) , N ] aN) m t;0n A o 0 O m S' a > 0ou -Om C ] 3 v im Z y y t v T m , > m X 0 - av) Eo > ma y E c - OmO uo 3 c :: -o v . cv °- ao arnmas Z o d iii 7 oo 0 a c c ca = c E .c E u p ° a c _ • 'Oa' a Eol a) m a) ) o O o c H o > o E o 0V a 7 Xd a °- c aN u m m o o o II o o E Y N o) _0 o a) co g E D c 0 T > Cw L ` T Ty, . T c 0 L Y 3 O 0 V O N L = U N o> -5 o. C > OO a cT Va) 3 Cc CC a s a) Yar a) 2 of -° uEuu03 Oov cv00o F u � m ncnm r = E a) 3 a) > a c a t o c I° Y L .n w .c o a a) ,n u U1 0 to o f d n u o a) E. m a, F H 3 i- n u > F o= a F uv a 0 N • C C fr.' O U a= U NC C c Z H e 2 N• T uaN 7 in 'a y cY a, aa7xal N7 vi oc . -_ c, ,y, a t N 8 u x E ai ua) o 8 w t' -g;. N 'C o 3an @ ., r Yl �N8 ° O a rL a7mN « gC .._ nCL N 'pL0 a m y O 3 5!, LC• 0 N N L t o N V = .nN TNOf L d V N Y L O O L aN WN t O ry LC p 0- N0 'N N U N E t 20 ..+ cErn7, .0 oa 0 0• 0 -cw nM o •a t > e m r 8 L a N , o a . VCL 0Qeii N OUC N '_ a, yZ M W C Ct0 N V � Nry 2 0 -5 N O rN a) C - N a) -O N lL > acl O to 0vo urnv v 12 fa a, 5 m O yr, 3 c i e2 as O o c c u Yo a E c c a 0. J ° 5 2waO g o _ g ° u v UU aY , C d "2 a ar ` 4 3 d o a a LCc , v o E0 oy aN E c E o N E '0 a) 1- 1- a a a dJ3a ucwNy m wEa) E 2^ ao m u c .- v CO co 8 5 Fol v vv3 " 7 o > a n a :odw caao a 7 m c r+ ? ' m2O c ` H1 ` - W a >' N v g a0Lad O ..-C-8 c L N m n O nE as O N W O ao L LC L -O WagC) co LL d N Y2TLpCNC z a O hF- 0 1-6 c, IL 0 Q ° E ra:! 3 E u_ w O co ani w E w a° a o ° Z 5 o m m m E N '”'; z 1 s ,ate x" v ;.--, N .pa� -0• O c v O c -- O w CO ..- v- o ti 0 0 `9 00 to .- __ c C w N = O O O) al 'p C C C u O p .- A .� Q $4 0, u O T C Ol • U N N U C U 'k . a to C ,. LU v O N CD CL C i COn w L • C w 'S rye\ A ,='; � i, Ji A ( -q}� per, A \ \_1q{K itc\iikS &-A\ F IA ; i t 1\ \`\.--. cq��-1 . {yam E p�pqt y}� e per. {:1 q,.{q\ Ili.-\ ''';',1:\ l 1 \\• -k-� ��-a-1'a+ea \Fn\'d.nl 1L.�3'Rd Wal�'d+l \' 1-4-1 k A--- s z \ ail �®Egr/. .=7..,./,z 1«�f 1 s: 0 i- t' /7t7 . 171 .,moi'=� .lY , _ ' a fff _ AL U "- w. lk # DI \\\) c .� o LL .777 m c Tc > mO OL COm > O U) r- O rnd 0 0 mE ',.9 . C cY 0 CO = C 'gin m v Co1 az cw m O O E T aaaT ` 0C u Cy3 . T > m N o Nrno tE EC L1.1 13 Nm C O m 01 ' u -O O' WuN ya) U) U a) m + C a) .c . u °um a ) E cu m 0. Cm mc .c 0, C 0 N 7, N R N -0 U O m co E2 8 co °' aaa E U a m a vE o 2 E a E a '5 c m C .0 g -om m c m a 0- c m c � 3au, v E — c 0 o ° u g7F v ' t . a s a m m >2( 0c -mco d = c2C E .0 o « Y E o .0 aam ac a'— 00 a' E T .0 'N N E -o c 3 o u u, mm em m m oca) 0 • Y N . . E c vi a v 5 m rnQ c E 02 m E3 ' E a C • ZUc w m L -0 'U 2) u,a O dj O Vc v a C ( -. 'g m ._.-41u„-i, c E c "g a — u .2 E rn 35 — u n EEg° au m a -o I a in a > co Q v a) r- m 2 m 3 a u fA w o 0 m E . �t tw -''''.:2•Qta....� 11111 I N I ',.,,.. ; 1 u, ik , ii, ,' .WAN . .. 11.1!.....r. E 4. a 4..1 ....- ') -: - .r , 4.,..., , % ,,,, , ii yli,:i -, , , - i r.,------- ' -v �r 3 • iii 0 :) w�a a. ,. fi • , 4,.a a. 0 sic ym ) .c. 4 M1`' '' ' Ak E a ' % , �.. 1. }yrr. , ,1 , , ,,, , -4, —. , ',---,--si.,, ,T.I'l".. - ' ;- '; a s 3' w U 4 .' A £ , c w r a 1,:',.;./ .� 't.'_'._'. „ b= I r . il v w 5. SP_ :"?.. ii 1111111111111111w- . Ci a ° .� 0 j tn o oa a, E '..: ',. ' - a ' ti o ..... '`':".,7''''' '' (1, o w 0 _. 0 G e b 'i:�• --,''''4..'.: .. 7' -G 0 G 0 - _. N '''.----._ A v a a w o 4 ►... :F o3y0 4,' 0 -0 �` 0 qr _. . • -0 0 -0 12 m 3 o CO L- U G 11111 .- t ..j , C 0 . G w -G H 0 N0 O . E - . oa aG 0 o > • 0 0a ct E . oE .a O .o O . F; o a t a ` • 0 r E o. u U ,, c G ,l'fi ,;yea p G N 0 H -C C ..2.° ti C a - 0 h .0 O O O l a o a - w 4 w ` 0 E a ° o ° CC W E c � . Z O cu v 8 -0 OV a0, 0 cn C 0 v 3 W q E 0 Q o E a, w O -0 w 3 UJ w 0 0 w ° .0 c d C 0 .0 Y O W E C -0 = cp o C -o - CO O 0 n7 L Y j a7 0 .3 v C H O d �' 'O V 01 -..1 0 • 0 0 O N 0 0 p IIUl1 - W U Y al C N Y C O a1 3 L m 0 O 01 a V ° Q Z. a) O W o - E m 0 c c J 0 r N Of O O « Y N O Y , a (.j v m c F g o C7 '0 c -1 E o U > 0 O o U N pc 0 0 0 cn c 0 0 m 0 0 U d _ U v d In `° cu o .L+ c -o Y .. C 0 N .' Z O r r •ni > w Y a P u c E J v N E c c o .0 c 0 E 0 0 F D a 0 ° r > o E 3 o c a� o v d ° -0 p m .c -f c E > _ 0 1 E L 4, N U U d U o •O c0 L V •7, O c w j ae d E c v a>i of 01 2 0 c r c -0 a C c o tom. a m O0 m ce . L N :0 m -o ` N . 0 E TA 0. ` ° N c. z = c vi '- a w E o f E o w a 0 N r � . N n0 o O U m m F.. :: a E y p .3 O w , 0it. 10n o8. 0 'O U Z D o w 'oE Y f E 0 E E c 0 a>, . 0, 0 ° a E E 0 D '- ,T Z « , U O C "O Y N N Y co r C a/ N o O ¢. C cop C a7 U "C2 w s 0 O .2 0 • O 0 m 0 0 — 0 0 . L . ` o C c N 3 f`0 .'C. 2 "° N IN a 0 a; c% O 01 F. E v 0 0 0 v E o r o Na In int >, o a, 0 c E E c o 2 -° w E ` > E .- o a In a 0 w m v c °, 0 0 o 0 N o ° U FL U V o a` $ w Ua Q n O o Z $ • ' a 0 a E . N a' 0) 0 0 0 a a c a, 3 0 ° o 4 v > o ° u y a, a 0 0 o .N., ` E. O C E a u, N a 1- u o a a E a 3 E c a, a`, ( a, a a 0 a a 0 N o E a, Oa 0 0 S � Q w 3 3 40 a v 3 o v o > a, 0 R a 0) a a, v> a, a 0 a o ao o .o a s a o c v o - a, a, .0 a 3 'v Q E Y 0 a -9 a o u a, c o a o o a, .0 h v c 0 a u cu c > 3 0 0. 0 •v, O, CJ 0 0 > c 0 v 0 -0 2 - a, c 30 a, a o 3 ot - a u o0 .0 0 a 0 o3 a `a 0 v 3 0 oa ' -0 c 2 a a o'0E s .=a) . o a o o a v a > ° 3a s c„ co 0a o .) L o w a 0' > N ° •avE a a av a c a, t -0 a s ,� - a v 3 0 m ° a -a, 0 a `O 40 • oE0 ° u a, oa o E a s a C3 ca aO N a N oONwc a o w ti 0 a £ "i _°a a o a o �, a s a w > a, Q "i aw Oa L 00o 0 9 0 40 a aac o aN0an a ° ' ' •2 is x > E ° _ N 0 - 0 o 2a9 N _ roc c . a 3 ' a, a oo m c a o ° • 5w 0 c aNa E -00° E N 8 E a0 ai0 a 0 o 3 0N a a i a 41 w al 0 2 3 v U m a o v 0 °0 > ° a u t a, v' 3 a 3 v a, o c a r a E _ 3 : € a 0 o_ 0 o 0 -0 0 a 0 ` N u' t a a v u 'u a ° 3 a 0 a c o aa', 0 a o 0 o v a, -°° > o W 1:0' g a c a 2 a U o N a o a v v " as o 3 c ° o a a m e 0 ° a a, -0 N o a a E E a a c .o 6, 2 a -0 $ v uv , 0 0 a0 a .0 c .a 0 O N Y O Q, c L,) -0 , a 0 v, in u 0 0 N c a a i c - Q a s 0 0 3 v a u o N u v a 3 ° a, a .0 a ( 0 3 .0 v ° 0 2-) o a N v9 °u o a o Q c 0+ a,, E c W o u a a U 3 a 9 0 a 'a Q.' N I . c 0 0 i Y 0 �O a ai 'a ° N N ai c u c a a o 3 E a 3 o 0 w o o o > --I v E a v 0 o , a, a a Y () 0 3 m v 0 0 a v 'a E a > o -c .E o' u c '� 0 0' a o a ° ° a a c 0 3 i- o ° > o •a o v a Lai.' N L h N Q y a a, 4 .Z a' 13 U o N Q v 3 a Z w ) Z •4 a E a Z o v E 0 cr) uac3 '0 = °" u a - „ aa 0 c a, C , o S p ° oti ° a a, 0 o ° ° ° a ° Sa a, oE $ . .- v � • a, uv n 2 .9 a, 0 i, �Ua a a O (1, v) a c 4 N L3o 0 a v a ._yo � co . ° c 'Sa o E. _ ao v ...0, c 0 cu 3 E .� c 0 O0 a = - N o ° c O0 a 0 v a, _ a o EEuFn a -0 ' a, Ca 0 aLu - w •o' c a, E a v 0 ocu a c 3s ° o Eo m3maa o E oc 3 aN 0 O .. -0 N a' C 0 o �' o o aU w a Lt w o mN u ° c ° 3 ` 3 O' W ` -c y o a ° o E . a, o -0 v) - o a i - 0 E a a, w a o Q. 0 , 0 .00 ` ° a3 .0 0 E a`,a a 0c a ' a' m aE o '0a - - -c _ a.c .o Q- ° '^ •� 0 33 a _00 a ca, ° '°tz, El? o " •' .0 av ,-- 5. o a, a ° ° ° c" 3a o o w c a 0.0a "- a3 a 3 a ° oo -o ' ° ' 0sw @ro 0 owc 0 o - Y ° 3 v a 0 a, a • 0 o so- '--- ao ° w v vW aa, )0o .j 'S uouc ao a0o E 0 40 Qa o a3 o 0o .., a 0. 0 v „ a a c a • W a 'a a av t a, u ° Coac o ` v 0 a v N c v EuN o .c Q. oua a v a ° a a a r -0 T...- Ea u 3 0 0 -00 ° a ° (U 0o .c 4 °. 0 03 , 0 34 Q. ° o m l a ca ra'37 •Qo ° w ° 4 c O •. o '4:.--' U C w o M- u - Vo woE an o , p o aO U _ C u c ° ', 3 Q a o` ° C o aaOu E o ‘-- N C C C U So O N N x G C O Q aN a 0 a ' i ) ct voc s O a) cV ho - Eva (N Li LOE 0 - N N 0 -ON .07 waOa• j S .0 -C.oc0N a oE . O o a(22 s .a N ooE r o ° Nc ` U -c . c v a w a5 0 0 oa0 u d a) a ° -c aoao v `uC 0 u c c -C ° a, v 3 ` o hE > o >aE o a) aE ) ooQ a a Q ., a —° o u ao � o f -on E -C m m E ; E n 2 2 co 5 a 5 2 qk 47 rva 1,1 Lis, o .41711: ' IL\ av ... _.._._ . n• csa w ud ---• a w a T. _. — w x Q, c o u . CN' I 3C3 oc aCc a) c c/- p E v \t 4u.--, a w a .12 c U a '- I d '3m o o gr ye N4C- v a vs .:-='o a m ' � a a ° II 1i Eg � _IdE o a a w �w,_ ,., E , E 42 o o -8 i -..o ` u a, Q I° C o o°E a 0oc a .-"x o va C ca -o o c 3 v o v �•• ,� c C a o c - ti a v a U a AI , ill r v a C ~- Z c o SC a W E R v o -o > w o ' y r a s :4; , — Q v C W , Z a y ci,N o U E W O Q., '2 a) C L a a v 3 o N U Jo 0 oy a ayjyS � y -C o 'C o O ° u E ro ac L.. c 0 a 0o -° o ° ° ao ua a, o o ` o$ U a o ( a `o E') o a, a 0 o 0 ° o a Q a (.t.? o = ao a 0 Na aNO Q0 � Q C w a 0 a ° O 0 a, a, 0 ic a o0 0 rnci v ° v c a o v ° 0 C w 0 0) E. a V` C > v U a va0 oc u ° a va m o v o = ` ° o o u 4 -0 u 0) g o a a 0) 0 a Q c 0 a 0 n a ati0. a ` a � aE o -• o >•o Eo ° ° o3E ° o, vo a N 0 .. a E .E ° ; , 0vv - a a - 0 ca, ,o 00 0 000E0 - o • -o c v) 0 0 ° a 0 0 oO oQo E v cu ati ° . 'a ° o .0 -00 o N C) av ° E a � a a u y a .- , a o a U s . o , . Ev E c aaaa o o Q o o a o .E ? o h ° o v 4- 0 ° E = c 0) o o v w °ca '' a x ,2 0ocaEE • acNa ° a a 0 aaU0O 0 .- e.) a, -4 wV w OtiaN ° ° O 0 _ Qat � EN h 0Q -oovCo 4Ca > aac c w ° a x ° o c aE °v te0Uou a, m o -6 0 a v a s Cl" vv, a, a a E 0 o c0 o ° o 0 c a ° c c 0cc 0 0 ° )- o 4 a w -0 a Q -0 0 0 a 0 0 .0 0 a E ° °1'4 U c o c E v v aa,, I a`, C� 4 .v 0 �•'c_ a, a c o a, v a, a, 0 'o a j 2 O = o °, ° E a. w a 0 4 E'E. o E o m o 0 0> > •• 0 0 Evo y c o > 0 a ° ' ps °) a O Q. CCU O Op N ' � O O o -0 a w N > Cy 0ayNs 0 0 s aE = o c a c .0 0 ° _c 04 ° ° -'� ° E ° a -° ° c ° as o o ° o v 0 S 0 N, -0 0 a v Es I CU . 0 0 • ° oL o N av aEa ° u 001No c O 'c v ° ti i ° a �0 0 O O -0 -0 a vi c Q aa, vQ0. O0 a, ) Z. 0 0 0 ) ° a o u °) v ° -0k a ` a a a c a , a u 0 o ° oE ' a 0, ° a a v, o. E c a �' O v E ° 0 ° � N-C , ° > N ° Niv o yN a ? ° 4 , ° a >° ' = c 0, ' ` ,3 ° vlw o 0u 0 M a ocEmO4 u a o Oovn ° v a 2 0 Q ao u E o Qy • ao 3a ' 0 ° 0mQu . 0 N v � o, v = - c c v, 0 00 a a 0 00 0 U o . °. a 0 ° c ' a c a 1 ` a o .o � t UNa c a O , LO4 ° O " 5 > a s os > 0aao ao` c w .° ' a ° ac a.0, - 9 a o 0o.0 •o � -0 ' E oEoo> oE cu aaa 0 0 0 0. a, 4 te ° ° v E . aa > c° a o 0 o .0 v a -0 o n Il v, 0> E ° a� -0 a o a ° z -0 o ° k a o a N d' N 'a .. o) 0 a 0 8 E -0 a O a O a -ao N 0 N, 0 .0 0 w °, . 'a0 00 -0 0 CU 4 v > > Q a -0 S c ° v 3 3 �° a c 0 o 0 0) 0 0 0 a 0 O 0 a a i 0 ..- ° O 0 j - ` a a 0 �, 0 0 a 00 u a1 a 0 oav ° ao 3 E -0aa, ° a ° a c `o , u o u no o4 E > ° > 0 S. 0 = Ois°3 w c aa o b, 0 O > O O 0 > Co I 0 0 u ,n t , 0 0 w _ E E LU . . 'S .(4.1 Ct) %r4c.). .a, ,CD •... ,_ 0 ::-...- :S., E ,... ...... ,...., a., s.- c 0 2 Lq S cs ',.. -... -E- 0 0 a, (;., 0 N., ;;;. .:0 -,., 0 ,,. ,i, I-, .0 c 0 0 c Ti.., 0 "0' 0 2 ... c'= ,_,S 0 0 0,- 0 0 a.) T LU 0 C 0 0 0 C 0 ul -L- -0 E - -c cr en 0 c 0 --,-„ iu ci, .. ••-: c P.. -C 16 -.1). ..- C .c lii -Z .:(T ", u (3) ,S2 -0 i - Q. 0 2 Q. 8 c c cb 0 0 CU Lu a) u ,..o al 0 -9, 0) EL! ,v,, vl io Lu Lu E IL' ..,-: o -C z o c:i a) o .= 6' 0 ',..',-; Lu 0 0 t o o N, -- o .-0 — .)a 0 TA' o -0 a. — u) *)) FD 'E- 1•,• 2 8 8 0 46 e, 0 n.t? a f; c's °,.) .0,, . z 13_.; ., , 15), -z cu. . - k. , .4' x 2, tS .0 0 F., 0 --,.- -- () -.6. 0 0. c.-, 0 .c , a0 1 ,..- ...T 0 0 0 - .,,,, ,... rs:,) .0 2 15 8 8 ')<L, f .000. ...:: 0 ...c.. g - ,; , 03 , R -,.7,,,-- i5 .2.), z- -'? -.••• -5 :.= 0 113 c 2 0 2 ,) :-..- .- -.- 4?. .- E ..) -- ,., .c E ,E .8 ,‘'3 8 0' 2 "(7) 2 2 0 pp 0 .c, -c, ;.-: „, .0 E -a c - 0 E. 0 'il &- -.. 2 ,9. 'E' r--- 0 .0 1p .Cu -,) .I3 0 ,° (1) — c -6 y, n, y) .1.) -E. ?.,....• c ---, , ...,1. 3.2 u) 8_ ,,,i .. 6 0 ID 0 •-• c ce, <4 0 cn 0 - ..,-.. u a 0 0 ..c, , ,, ., 0 —. ,. 8 .z. , .- 5 0 ,E 2 Q > 2 ,S 0 2,. 0z &D 0 u u -- i'''' 'N. . 4,4 4r4s.p.-.r. . . , . . "sr- pi: .. ,4,ce6, --"i ./ = ris ...k, .i.„ .., •-a f,, ..--,, _44ipt. , . ., . ! 1 .-t -. ') ' •-fx*,. . , ,.......1r,. , . .t. .. . •. '1,,t. 4 ',,,- $.41 1110:40 - 4,4. I . — — ' . '‘......1.1 . PM di m ,, - ill : ...t. :,-;--"/ ,, / :. . ,—/— ,-----r- —r-- i--- ... , < —"— / / / ,. k :' 1.-' .. ..„. ,..t,P.4,..,, , .... Q.. . , .., . . . •,, . , ,,,,„„,,,,,„•„„„„,..„,„,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,.; ::.::4-7.r.:.::.—' .-411q4.±.:-.71t-%-'7 7.::, - ' "-' .•'4'' 'A ..: , - , :, '-';:gi.,J.,.'„. ': :::,:.-::';',:',z . ,',-•;:=:, :i::.,-;;,,,.:,-:,,•• ___- fs.-:::. '': .:1'-'k,-.., .',::- ,• .:::.:-: ? •-f-- ,..,:: 4:- --, -- „iv', - - ':,"-.-:'-,`',,.•. \ ::'. :, -.=::::,,,, :-::. • . „: • . . ... ''• -. v ;• ' •- :':j ,'•,:s.:',!:'xl,";-•1:.--,,,'•• . " '‘. • - :;,..', ....,;..-' „:44, ,, \ \ - - ' =,..W i /.....'•,.-#—, 1.-:.•.;;;;,,•:-'.-:,:::. , lik,,,, : i •:t: , ' •:,;„,:,..7- A N ' , - :\..............'- •":;',?:''''$,,i* '''''' ''i''', .,,,' ...; !tii:.::. i,I.,...,_ ,."',. w : V......... ':';':.',,S''.'ii'.:.,,:',g.,::;;k!.::.;:,..: -:,:-'=i :,'::'.'L.:' ,,:',, ' . --'4.'0'A'''''''- '''..'...,.,„:. -.• . -,-.,' '4',' .' '. ".-- (2) . . . , -— — — — — — ----.' ... A17,,,,w30,,,,cfev;m0.411,c.--1 :%°::,',.45.0;.„lizA•4-ivittiky% V) N, 0 0 C c v a3 a r c o v j ° ..-- .0v E E 3ow v b Q a aE w�_ . a, a v 0' E a - o o u o o v � a av a C 3 v = C7 w. o a ` v avc ~ a Cb N O ti v4 O " , a - 0 O u N a > �n a.� v w w c ..o c o o v n v c $ 4 a '� c , a - H v vaN 03 .2 s • w ti o a c w o v c0 vi, v9 v a w u c a 4 `ac o v o g.' c a oo 0 -C _ a ) l'.av o N > c v a aa s o v u aa u o a o a a • v0 13 a c 3 . ' ° o v a � o 0 o o c 0 c = u ac > N Ca octO ° ON5 O ` O > .-. � C O , ti n -0 - C ac v b a wrnw a O . (L uOv °p ' •v ` ° o °a u v . aE o ,} aa a C a L. O O C v E "° O a C V ° ) aEc = ° u p U wp N 'C p C =OOO H3 n o - O 0- 1., -C N N 'Ca O E O O) v a) o w >, .. 4. -C tN °• Q o ` o a, v0 -c or a, a, 0 a, ,o 0 uOv. a pO h O a E E ° v pv) iv ° o v a ° °o -c n U -0 CO a U co —a s E in v Eu t aa 0 o a ov° oo ° c ` 3 ° c r ° no wu O '0 Na) NC Naaa N O O v -C m • CU OCO C NN C 2 , p t.), � av o � c • a~ 0 v Eo v a°O , o o v L. u w ouna v c v c v v ° Ovv ° c v N n u N 'O) o a a o, d ho O6 a (✓l u 'C a • . ac v u a oa 0 U ••-.,oE a k v r-,vQ 3 , a O .O 0 a o h n p a o ? o a)n o- c o a t0 a o L03v v ° E v , O ° c ° Ow0 ° a C-C5 v a, a v) m � _ u3 ° > Q ° c o _ c° a ao .c a 0 in cb N Q a O .>, a 0 a ti 0) ao o = t oo - Q O v, 0 u a C a v cu oE c ° i • o -(-3., a, ° P. o a 6 Q >) ° 8 a,E ° E o ° wbN 0a n v a = c woa .. av . o °° v o ° r ° G C .- E.1. � Z c t u O z W n in c '0oW > o o O o o a cN o va o a c m Q ° c : . v) a3 u ) 3 o y c3 a �, a 2 C o c> s No o a U crno O. 0 v • ° ° vv ° _a c a a Q o Qc Ceau a v y 0 E o c ° a ac o°i Z -c v E vv in LD Q u tmo a u 3 o �' c ` ) a a E a v a o vo n v cu a v ' a)0 3 ° aa v o ° a t o o a Ls,- .0) Qc a a a a $ >vv a a u) Cu O c b -0 0ivo , O O v) 4.-. C ao 0 O U) N a ', n a v a 06E N • v L O C> v a c U> as v oO c n0) O a .> UO E G o a a awa a MO G w Na ,_ N O 0 a y> - t Z -S-, c p) YSN W CNc o a c ov 0 ° a ° ca m ti Q a a •a -° a C 0 N ° j° Oo o ON o cca5o • _m a � n u n , o oaw o s a n C -- N C Ogb0 oQa a a c o 0 y N0p v am 0 > QC • o a 0 a a n S �, Yv aco) 2.a Oa u 'C ° a Ca 9 a) a 0 ,COU o Ha u3 o tiEa a a a c Cl) 0 a ° 0 o o o ` N c vII 0 ° N. 0 > 0 rn0 - Lo aN O LLI o O N 1 a a u E v c E . a Q >, aav c b v a W c co --- a a oca E w a u0 c a uv • cov yOG O „„) 'C n 0 > a yJ a v vi 0 > E U ° ° a0a oo -- av o o cu v a c > a ° vo E n a o E o)° vN ` o b ° lt n _ a vi O v 3 acti p C , -° a a o G 2 0 \ / , \ & a / G . o \ 2 ` / t 5 ` ) / % 0 / \ / 2 / \ \ \ k { E ` . ( % co E / / E \ \ / 0 u / { c ° k 0 \ 2`: y ) ` \ \ \ \ / ) ƒ \ { o \ C. [ \ ` / c { ) , : t N » 2 = g ! a a a J a o \ E 2 § \ ° ƒ ° 2 a / a 2 A ° § T. o ¥ » m Cr. , & ) E \ 0 ) . \ \ \ ) 2 > % / \ o 7 5 2 15 0 o 2) / { ) \ \ ) ] . » E t » o 'o [ \ 0 \ / ƒ 0 f \ 0 0 > c z $ § £ £ ) + \ / \ \ / U) Cr) \ 0 0 \ 0 o \ g § o 0 ) 2 111 » 0 e ° a c g ± 3 e e \ m ! 7 f / 2 ! ƒ t { \ E \ E \ £ / / 0 § a 0 0 § \ \ » \ _\ \ 0 \ ( / : _ k 3 ƒ \ \ t 0 { .... § / 2 9 \ \ $ + a ) w o 3 ® 2 2 \ E § 0 c \ \ \ 5 : o / k ° / - \ j \ \ e 0 Q. ) 0 _ = a o E > , e u k \ \ / z.> @ » a / E o \ \ \ \ S. \ \ e 0 g / G \ 0.. \ )1i; ) \ \ § \ } j _\ o 0 { \ — C a to k o \ o & } c u ) ) / \ \ { \ \ o .2 / \ / \ D x e 0 , £ D / E a / / E 2 $ 0 V) 2 E » 0 = c 0 § � k / ® co co _ § J / ® a \ 2 ® - / § ° • k ) 0 U = C - en C k .4?.' / / I / - & 0 $ % U C ) E 2 E ■ E E c 3 4 E % @ a) ' 2 co C ® / �® - / d \ / \ \ $ / 2 / c g 0 9 0 E 0 = $ @ W. f \ 2 § 2 5 £ 0 u / f / / g / > \ 2 ± ± C Z . § : k 7 ƒ 5 2 2 / a 0 \ \ m 2 § - 00 , % / C ° a) -0 E 2 E S o \ ) 0 \ = / / \ U) MC _ £ f U 3 u E / £ / 2 0 ± c • U • et � OA' CC 3 ® 3 -o / \ ) = « / f 7 \ \ ° ° ° co / 8 \ & % % / e / 0 0 0 $ / t / g \ ± / & g / y % / % MC c co 11111 ƒ E C coco 4.0 L 7E, 00 a:5 (ll CO / { 0 ƒ f / _ \ W f § \ o o % o @ a co 0) \ / / E 0 ° § C C 0 0 / CL E \ / a > / \ 0 � ■ .3 * y £ m c I E f 2 / —0- e inal ° 4 O \ o f ° $ 2 ■ ± / R f 2 % ) $ / C \ / 3 CI \ a 2 m o E E 0 - \ C E ) / % ■ >, 3 0 0 0 E ° ° It o \ 3 O > 'C uj CI ° ƒ U e / ? \ E k CO/ k 0 2 8 / (U © co E = C \ § 0 u 0 2 .0 ) 0) £ £ 2 O f * % E 0 0 4 u C E ƒ CO O N CO Z $ y % © \ ) D § ƒ/ \ C % f § $ $ O u % 0 \ ± CO a_ Z a 2 4A- c .- ._ • c • • • . DI . . . . in 4 MOOMMIM ,„.., 7 u 1 .. ,�__ ,, ,.. ei . :t J alingliellONIF ig Vii_ ! STM: ., ,� I : .. .. - x 1 INNS 1 .e'*a rte- -.-.:.1lii i .dem ir mow._ ' r IWwYrWY •M m �'�"ee""� '.w '' as x 1p..a, IMS sa xy ' o q ll+ rt ` irr yfar 'h MILi� . . Z Q '' _ za O t;- . lt .., ,'.r Qit,W cr r * a i '� r',,',i'.1�a.x^ ' • 0 (n . , {LLJ i. -` . ..., ., W ', $- III ,fir' A' {i i ,�. �{AyfY'n'Cy tom;: r ..u,4 C coo @ o C o LL C W N U r6 Ory �) C C M W U W - r c6 Z 1 :J -.f Z O Z W 0 Q a / � �, O tj ( mM �) 1-15lL l) = J 1 cni- \T:' �� i i r` 4 h cy)/ :,_ H---T-I 1 j ,.._ , _ : 1 i i I 1 co' .111 I. li in ,.awArI. ri 1 w —II _or ICO N- OCD / i I F- ... _ -... r� I \ W L__-_ 12 ItiiiiiiiiiiiL 1 a / / c 411111nm11R r I va co 6.- C 6 1 CO �./..(�J7 ...p r f f y >-t=t 1 ❑ c c d v a) } I / y m F3 .. r-- 1---_.:_X .__ W to 0 1 Z N 1 o - Y r a i ❑J 4 CC rn I- I- f- f- V / / Fl / / /I ❑ 0 C I- i- i- I- I- ,- f- s S— l/ / / Y / / A ❑ ❑ C 9 H H M A / H r R— ] 0 0 0 a o z A „.. \ ,... . . ,.... 1 . <t ----—-- ,:-/ausumrimmtik. dcw.m.awalL,-/Aw.o. i . !,. ,k„, i ., A 7-;. 45,t ,, t ,7_2, 1:!VItn: 1 , 'ia7t,';z),Tm.it , r. ',,,,. ii \ _...„,. I!*.• 7' k '4--‘98 , \za?A\.3,,,u,\.m-,..s,,n,ltrv;,u,\,,,a...7-x. . .A ,%Ea/a ea ill \ ”'..,, . -, "'NIL'6 i ‘, Ale; ;.k,.R,;.;,:\ - i 1-1.-u.„,"-II-1-.+....t..-1.-i 1-....it=c-''3 ,lavis;Nea ea . a \ :,.. ,) . ,.- )A.1._A ,r"' ‘M!1aZMI=n :Vk' V'Z ' ' . . .7f!k .h? MlF.a \ ‘4! ,„, . \ \_-1\ \':`n:-..-,,T2/34*. zg 1,=1- .--,7,) k-- k`ttratiatEstiNtik-tielktik-tt&-trff \ \ . T.i._ I A rt. zzrtr / .7 . :7 , ,itrm,z,ta7 . z:v,z ,_ Tia ,ztEm, / -9 , , -_= ...-,.. • N__. ,tfv, ,,zv 't:f . ,' ,.' , ._!1 ,zA_7s7,1A\ \ 7,r - /77// /7-7 \ vr- 11 /11 1 ,v1 Jill.m7.E7w., . . -. —. . . ', 4.ii,_' \v/r- _J44/111 I . .q. , . ', f, /,/. '1;/1 /:. ;iliakt ,''.7--1 ,' 1 , ,/ ,1;, ' '''t V 'I I / 1 ,. _/1 1 I . -2...f,-,_L.,---'.-:_7,---f-2:f:ILI,--If.-`, ,,• '1-f- . 1., '.,,-• 1 -. IA Qii-g1;71;/ ' / V -wi-v2;g/;; Iiz 'lg' -57777:04b,- i„ -I V ' , —_- 1 1 - •—• (------\ 7----\ 7 ( \ 7---\ 1213 ) ( a ) 6-.1—. ( U. ) ( 0 ) ( / ) ( —) ) H ) \ _/ \ __,/ \,_ \,____,/ \., ./ `.. /' \--,-, ‘, / a) c u ea c a_ I 1 ii—Lal 8 8 i O E 2 1 LL1 c a) m cc .r i 0 w , w H , Lu . , \\ •-• ,, E7 0- '1 rc-- 'IIIIWIII 00 ) 0 / j I /(\ I-- ' ' W U) 0313 NIVIN -<' 0 ---- . - • . ,.- 1 2 4,,, IN 0 h 1 ‘e I b 11111 _1 U- co CL. Cs1 -, 2 N — / r CO ‘i--------- -. 0 0 , N / % 0 I 1 1 _ ; LO Y.— 1A Ell z >- 2 C _ 0 I ' O < n_ 0 -J Z < I 0 0 ',..._..)4••----= - ' Ail _.1 N c1 ) , I • U • a • I Z LICE c• . . • rho � ' ,, ,,# / AVI -- f AA � .Y' � loV/ri�lrl WAINl�fxl�l,lA1l,W.MLIFATACIE, 'o, ` '\ / 1 •- .1 ,'t , ,' ,��`,7"'.` ' ,1'5.`nI ,..��� 1 \ \, , � , �x\ .. I 1 x -: yam-,-r-7-7-7= ;//,-/� C' i it,1 �t ---�_ \ '��� =! I /=rNrN/ :/_! ! �- �L / I 1 \V \V .. i7* 7 ,v=7711 7-7,7 ‘., '., '' ' ' ` ,. ,' f ,' = 1Ig=0 - , a w 11.1 1 .„-----.„ „---- 3 ( 03-) ( 0 ) u_r_.J) Lc_ ) (0 ) ( i) ( _J _., (. \.____/, ../ , .____, \,_.,1 1 a „.,) . . o a' c<"' C c d 00 I 1 ° r U 0 OQ co 0 ja v o e o 0 0 CD -0 _` TT v E O) Tr 2 " a N O 0 rY ce 0 ce w W w (•� - w w ¢o (l\' 1.._..._ ❑m ❑m r 1 N � l N \, / r lYl3 } F Z _o w I w I_ O .°. wIII 411 Z }x�.£, ---1 b 414 Lwo2+ ■■.. NJ s O p Ln O 1 EI / Q O j 0 o Ha m 1 D a OI i e_— 1 7 El Z Lig , a f ' _ ''' v g ' IL A, ; - ,/A/Ac' , _ ', iiiil k _ a �A _ . v A., u ,, A_ -,,,,,,, ,, . .___,T,_._ ET � L_ ,,� a t \ "/-7-/ ir 7.z ,7-7 ,==-1---x ,: ,.' ' ' '' ,' \'' ,,'' ' ),,Z, �„ 11 111 /= ,Jl„ . 1�1. ��.�s2�'0j T,`P ii."-__ �f w.13., �/ 7� ; 7Wil:yg;gao all,1 I =f_-_-1_,-_-_-_,--..L-L-.--P.L."1:',-..t,-'.-t-',:L'-_L':`,_-:-_,'.L-1; ,, ,., / -„,,-i. A , V "VY1 V77 Ig' rq — V= AiI Air Y # , , ---- (---- /' 17 --1) r' ,' , CO ) a ) (1.--- LL ( 0 I , -J 1 I 1 1 M a N C O C E ,.�— U d 0 d7 } C3 CO L / O O g W - O0 0 00 m 0 r _ -a3 W m w ce_:---- 04 Li m _ m 7 l II 11 III LI f OO wQ L Cr:.--) O O O O 0 I� _ r_i_, i 1 _ ;__ Cc [_1 li 0 N �,/ W — m 0 2 0 I - O W 0 m - e N Ir --- E e_ ( .cc N- H " fl Z Et / n wait v v AlLi f --ir 'A hkAtik\r/Vhk NAN/CW/1k • diV iA\--\.„IL _ (' --,..-.-,' , ,...__ ., , , i . z , , ,., ti '\\v 1 ;a,m = = m mi m , .-‘ _ , .,\ v,,.....1h / ,V t I \ \ `, , , , ,'-'7-1 , !, \ ,..' " ,° .,7 , MM` 4 lk t - i' -- X‘ \` \ , '-f,tn' Z ,7,4L-- . 7q7..gt 4.4..,-: ma, : i ,; \ v. .2-7-7, ;\.sw , , ,-... ,7: , ,•.z .-- , , , 1 - ,1721 1 -' ,a '\ , AP, • , \ , /7-177-77-7 111-, . ,'+ 6'.__:7_,.,. \_7,,' __,:n'Z ' \ iir—ril.Li W lig2g211-1 'Ark' ' ' Vir"--/_1411./ i I . 111 ;1 ;1. :-1 ;;I ;f1. ;11; 1 ' ;1. 31;-1 . ,Efa ` 1g1I1".- V AL.E1all,T7 ..!..1 .:. l' '11 7w ., -.1. 4 i 0 \ I I r( re) 1 1 1 .6,_• .. -. ---- _ 0 u 0 , so . _ ii _,, 0 cs- YA—-) o 6 cu 0 4 w i% Li i 1 a 112 + 2 1 4, n 0 75 u, ----, o (Ii"1 1 II Li mujcilx w c-717 col--)) Ot; _ "MIMI ' 1, csi 1 --i 1 EN- I w _ ...,. 1 1 . • , O 1 O 0 . COW 1 ' .11 4 4' I 111 2- 1 LO 0 W 3 0 11 b N -___ ' CI 2 I li w o . Do o ,- 4.1 w - o , w co I li 77:;------- , - , --,- N13-- I .- Z LIC IPZ 1111 , ow A' V . . Mt . . liki v . 1 , . ir ...;... AZ0ralitM7Prig: % ui ' \ / orr, 7t:vtTn, .Lvmemln'tt,' , 'z3: ' ,'1.::Atatwtz, 4111 t \\\ = '''' 'k'''-'` ' \ ' ‘\Va,=' :Ai,=:','=.0='=:;`.=,..=\7=:!..71‘111 Tii ,' ,' ,L±EA cg;1 Tillr".."Vi'M \ 1/ / IA=-,.i,:,Mi,..... \ \ , \ . \"--i .1E1'`,-: ,,""1,174L 1=117.112P 1=L 4'a!12'..T.L1i= 1 ?, k' ai it , / , \Lomma A., ...._ _____ ,_ , ,,.._,,,„,, ,-71i7F, ,. ,' .,V',V,V7,,4119ItSkIttIatrer . ,4 _- V ------t , -- \ \ \ -17,_ .4__\3 ,-T--\ ,,- .,_4:aM _ 77_7 .,ay . ,,. , , \ _.Aymmommtatzvtam 4,--f-A7z74zsm, e ,47:ii.7 7 / \ j/ .3.441. , k,'r ,zata ,,t.117.', //.' _ . . . =1 177 g 1;Q r:7-7 = -17--1 i-1 1 Alit ;-_--IT 11-111.E 1 1.ffi V.7.1 M...NORM. $'="leilr-- ' i' .1 1-1-I 71 I,r 1 .g17I,1;1 , I3, ;1 a, , ,t. [s\ .Q' r. '.,t;I, ',..s.e. -•-.. ' - '''.7=, A \ ,\ V Tr-77 1 I HE 0 1 1 'ft;Lt.,- i 11:7:I_LI ,.;I Z-:-/:.:A 1_4; — i oil - ',:t '5 C;g. ` J'.4 1;17111!"- V \11 i-_V L.:,Z;-11!";1 ,.''-.1- 1;-1-'1 E414'4.3Tiorw---,........-;- _ \ •,, . -- , 1 , \ .il i ----- \ 41 , \I A. /, / — \ CO 0 UJ ) ( LL 0 I 1 I I Q. 4 hr., ----„, a> •ct" z ',. ,' c c o co U ci c 0 11 ;:: 1 .. Z f LT- 2 + ,---_, v) Tr Elul ,, ,- II 03 MEM E 0 7 - r MI CO ) " ,..„,„,„.4 , c, _ . . LU CO ,/---', • , Iii—iirMirell MIMI 1 2 Mil z , / o k 2— OD EJ 0 b Ct II — 1 . 0 1— I LLI Ca — N -----'-''' — v- IlL--96.----- s_._:.,.. I , 1 , I e- I , I I , 1 . I Z 111 11011;iii rha , IOWJ\\ V i ...,.. i.\ ) A'Av ii\ I&TAVA1,7C7KII•CW7A1-11tM77 IA, ( 1 AALI., f),'t ,. , 'z -zf,,' , .z . .: ,sz,'zfuT, , ,f ,,z!oz,7z!, 11, .It \ V— l \ , t' \: ... - il, '\ , 17 \ \ \ 1 \ / \IPq , `74.1•' . . "."."..'".... ' ' ` '.411N \/ / -44 . •00,01=. '1ar=11=22,1211=1=,"r :;2A7374,7Vc;,171E?, 4Bm 1 ' it\ ' z ' v \ `.-•= g.:-;' ..= V EL:tr_,:,,\ ,.eit'l, _7 ,.1:,\\\,_„ . , I k , ) '--- ii 1 7sn_.-a.- ,‘A-A1 ,7r. •tr. ,' ,efztzlm,zam,mm,r1 I --1--,/ //' \ ,---' i 7. ,,1 , , : ,' ,7'&f,'Im1=_.\v _f ,•,m7:tfl.W\ -1 -•''' /, . .11 71-1,En7711J., , nrg.;;;,c;:isey,.. —;. 1,,.i_ vir ll 1.3 .a,,,, , ,;1 . '.1f.g.r;1,, w7= , -11;1. 7.Q, ' a AA y)qt 10.41. ' - v i 11 1 Al 1 LI- I 1 1 — , Luz f !frirci 1 4 0 co 0 a_ co c 8 1 c3) 4 • 1 •t- n F-1 „icaLli /1 0 ( re C73 ) I / f_ CCI I \ " E , \ w• 7---) * - Z iii'li i-t1 + 2 I z (0 0 0 b W ] [1:4- cst o w u - co 0 . ,- 0 cc - o 1 w co _ (5,71: -- - - - mi• ... 'Li •-•- ____.,/ ..- I 1 Z lb.111111 OPP.aiii la ELAN V V /1"/AW/AMAVAWKIAnAviik\AAVAVAVIA.7 Vela\ 1 : ' 2c-1-\'3V=k, vtt,1:5,1::VIMIM,'' .. 7:k?i ,ilm'zy,1 ,1M /t_., '- 1 a ' " Tii-1411:11-4rrk .4stcerS'-PA\T-247•1-1aZralla Irt , ,.., --40 .‘ ,1_ 1 —_, \,„:....... ,=, -.. ,... ,v, (.. -.-- t,t1k-, ) t , it\ 4 ,__\ ,ss, k, „,z\,, - ;215:17m1:vm?zm,t ,105.s, , ..,,if iri.,, ,,,.7.-7 1/ , .,li\ 1._ ,.,, \_ ,3 , , ,/ , ,` "-,. - t i ti iji liar v77 , -W 4 lz• snY.EMO' 1,= :=7. 'L5',0--TAR,w4,, ' u 4,641, 1‘,\ i . # i#^-, 1r co 0 w i u_ 0 i , —) __I 1..r.N I 71 < an. otl dill it ru 0 LL1 I — — - , L,t' 7- --‘ \_.-• I] 1 1 L 1 -1\14-4 j 2 0 1 Ei).-- b 141 tu -III E3 N CO II — TY a w- (--- _ I 1 1 OPP.Aiii Irri V ,Ilk t ' 7 ......... I. IN IICIK INA\Iik 1K i hiC 11C,LANAtdr A =1 ICV Ari. I -----t1 ' 'A ':3IE:Ori7Lnak%f1Tfkl:V .Z .' 17NM t2k•teiMIMA IL 11.\ \ , x ""' " ItFA = 7--\ -ii-11,--=VAV-..-T-I,F.747.;7,-,--a-r,vv,,-.V.Fivi_=XsealEa,iae;A iv\ A ., - „..,.. ? --,---,,?;=A := asii=- .- . .-.--1-, -1,-.7s7717,a,zsAwk a _ \ tcamty= s , ., . s •. ,s5,, , ,fa t A , , \/ I ---•2 ----' lk,zi ;:-/, /=f --- -tmEttEtiiNtlEtk'Wk-ttikttktiStalkiii.. , , v ' _ 1 -- , ,z: ''z , f, ‘ ,. i-'gfigfidiarafgrkeiti;rieigtgi ' --- -i --1--' rti _7=1\=,t1MtCattaTaMT;a1t5AMI:YZYZI'laT4,1f3,71,M '''''r ' s\ ' ,a. ,i N 1 1 -[ 1:1 iiitiiiit ,' " ,71+, ° _7 , _ ,,, ii II II/ 1= Ifiirffir;, . , 1- . 2a1::"-J1 I • 1 ' - -7.0/, VX:;tr=1F\ • 7'ir .1 :111 I.g = .1;1. 1 ',,rgZI,Tg :gri.r;g1;11,-;j72 C y T77 / AJ V2. \ ,. 7- CO ) (C) L.LJ) ( U- 0 I __i -- i I I I I 1 I I I ' 1 ti ---S. 0 ca, Nn i D } ,-‘ - - _ u ti / 11 •E 0 W .-. o T2 D el 00 til.:". Ell :1 W 1111111111 ••• • a 1111111111 W 00 in b - il [1:1 0 — CA _l 0 II ,- i e — I ) I i 1 I z l 1 lg.. Li t#1 Mt k L v..' ���' l v�'n�� � ,'- �®®tel® } -\ \v„ t ,` t°1 ‘`.1.-`1='' '''''' mErn Aix,Tale,a,I's MIDIElk .' '''FAI' '' 'XI%-al\ V / , —Ili S't `l I 7-� -N (---CO ) (p� (W ) �W ) /0\`' (_ ) ` �\ �J �� ( 1 - 1 I 1 r- M °; .. w i -- o m W m a 0 0+ :0 0 1 ill w M N IIII���II'� I I w. / -'' I XLI W �_ 0 1111111.1I — . w CO I M y II – N- -‘-.-1.1;7'-)--' -'-' 1 I I Z LC 4940 4\\ \ goo y 7) Art, \ 4. -s N. ivr.41. 1 'liMiAVAW.IFAYLAW.Mholw AwAr At'AWAY& ', vi i 1 s1 a I \ 7c'Tj=rtk4 tr.. ,r4t--:-.7.vvravra..2*.-4Y-r.kvzraitrx1/41,1 •k=, ==, ,, ,, ,lw* - ' -"M. a -...,-.4\PFR=;---.,7,P; Ea:= =fir.it,.:.• tr.it=1.- rx 1...yr.I.M: :.... ::A3=, , A.7 la\ / , - v_t_i_1 ''Z'Z 'tn =1.=:rta`123i71t.' ,. ,, k' k q'. a /I _ ......._ % IR 1 \ \ \\ X\ - irg===== IllitilittAttAr4CtiXtlYW'A= 1\--- 1 , \.--1 a , v \ ir-li II,I=.:fr-P-' 1 •".-: OiffriiiT_,--9I_Oi i1 - ' 1 -tri Tiiikaa'Z'a3:=11:17.MMI`MI:VZ5, 'Z ' ,3 ,ZM i1,1 . V1154 47.ffir,,r/irigg . Iglgo7orgyiEV- ,_ A I-t- g....ryJ , . ., lf- gzii . 111 7-11 I vl ,z.„,,17.7.1.,...,, .;:i7 V Wi ''11. ,:7 `,t/ '.1;4 '/ ' V 7}7737-/%117 —7 P mi ii In a a / \ _I: \ \ CD i / - --.1 / I' 1 1 I NP to") 1 a 'el ' _ 0 c u co 0 / '-•f--•) 0 IN 0r) ) 4 o C3 s cr. -0 w I L1.1 0 ( -. 3 3 A' .0 -6 c ,------ 1 '-' ' en c w a; 0_ 1 1E11111MM CC)_j—. )11 i Mall iL) - E i i Z rd• Er ) I- Z l w 1.- 1.11 I 1 1.111111111111L i EIMIIIIIII . 1 1 ,---- , / ( in : 11E1[1111:4, III b 01 Il - 1 _ 1 ,.,... ..: I C I-1' 1 1 I e- I 1 Z ivillit EA gra /, 40111 V V ..0" a .4..".. ' I A t /Mk'klir/A'.4. LA t k, ha Irk k IA IA 441 IINIA 1\ , 7i . Illi\I\ A.7...... k , , , , ,`12, . . ,1vt. , ir, \\' km — ',71 'k 77cm 72c , ' ,.9.,ati*.w.e.,,,w-n-e.qa vr-, i-GAI=, . ,., ,15.;7 ,\Ili * \, • i \ t_Ei. 727=0,3i=k43 H=Iltiodildvalbiodhd•nolibtailtballii 1..-11adt...1:.. 'PA.. z;=VT:=Az \ X s_ .1 / y ma 7,Ml 1r1 '= '•f%'' ki-AsZi.''' ,` :\''' '' '' V'Z'. 4° S:' ,•' k.' k'"fk'' ' .• •51ff it A %.. , :_x_\, ____„x2= 1 ,11471..ni„vtlEtx,ttc,t4 \:*\, \, & \,, , __ _r. ‘.i.t , ,. , i„ I 1 v i vrr7 sia .a.'z'z, , , ,A , ' .szvzf7 ,.' ,•'z5, ,' Im, I - .., -'t ,=,,,, ' - 'e7zA ,• ,,' '' ,•,z5,° ,'' s , ", ,' \ii. , 7--taa _-_-_.- II I= ,,7-u 77 .m9'. . ,,•Q'-., 1:7,,r1;.rglii37..4-t-''\—t\--''''''''''— /14. k 1 Ti=ekik=ii ..-,,.._,,___,,-_,.,—,.._,,,j.,“--,...-_, eg;f6tZ;g1g,/, ,,..1!" • s V1-1;7 I / 'W11:' ' /':'Lff:;'""-M-''I'—='''—''"'-'—'"--"''—''--' —''—'-'-' .=. /-g1;/1 ---1,••= A , ' __\y/ 7-i=--/-7 ;2. .ii.li/ig'Z:•;/ g ,,_1,t_i,,__11_1.,,,,44. 'I, w.# E r's i . /, . / \ -) --\ / --J c0 0 Wr) LI- 0 I —) T 7 I , f 4g--- ff, ,, • I a) c u co _______II -.ii ,1 C a. 0 6 co 0 Il 1 LLI w G) 0 713 C ,------ \ 1 I I I I (I) C / • ( N7) 1 \\ 1 \ I IN1 \\ j 11 LL (1) 1 ii limmump , , immipin I orec.) , ? y I 1 1 u, ii Er co ,\ Kr4 M IIC) N--• N i \\ ..... 1 Zu , _................._ . IIIIIIMMIL — , 1.11111111111M -1- il In 4 2- / ) b irL° ) lN - it ,- _ z----;:-) -f- - ..- 1 Z lil "Maw 151 W Z z ' ii U Z q F w OU w b� g, ;A uJ LLI I— C3 w� W wag a 'Fy:' O 1 a" 1 �a w z U W�$9 Z Z = F U= Z 55 O w05E Z< U rf i Y 2 ''' a ri K 9 tltl LL G R d a $ o� g 3 w `e c -LI °moo L "I 1 �R . O zg LL of ___... ...... 14 7i:7 An. o d it. *Ai:.„,11:14.:1.:11iii: . IGM — ,—1 71—-TT----7—7----r--.3 5 I sl • w^� r I iiiio ./ 1 • 1 i r ill' w�. : I —-I ]vw3 1 h =O« � LLa� cc — 0 � �I 1 '''& 4444"k � I f it id' _ Q\ I �':1:::,i, N' , „ ,, .:.... •.,,,•.c„ccac;:crc::c„c;;cAll :.rt..�,c:;v,c:: r L� i. , ,. ., l L�ClI�1. ii;�:i::: ;;r'ii»iisv;, :; ;i� � .. �. 1 spiel 's O� /// '-i I I 1 anileitnillffiffiragirrigilMiligli 1 7,,, / T � . x I _. a ,, 4N4`...e C° � n F1' ,1° 8 O // .,, 9 '`e // oAci /i to !n, :IC ■ a '�0a-00 e' I 000 tl,__ „ 0 e 0 Z , J w ,., d N Z W eo c, F O f "� '•t ,. ',8:,,.:',:',.:',,,,,•A',_' 1` �a � r�� "� ,, firf" a s —. 4'''''''''''' a h. i. •«. . 1 a � PQ . ■�w��s� li. II.ti;l' CO• 1,1 ,�• w ry `A y a o c J a . . b tt- Ct -�A0' i .., in ...... V �..� I ........ d'mr .......... tr " - . *I.: „, /' i r z/ :: I I..:--- ''',..:' wm c '':: �% :4P,'''' ` mom• ( Z ',.'''''''4.-- +r T rt u �+ 6. •< AeF7 // Y 1 t x „r.. Lij fy 1 .Wg a X �J .,L �EPa � ro m� Va��b_.,:-..,::,:7;;;‘,, ap aro' n0k;tt, t � SHENEHON BUSINESS&REAL ESTATE VALUATIONS July 28, 2017 Mr. Carl Runck Ryan Companies Directory of Real Estate Development 533 South Third Street, Suite 100 Minneapolis, MN 55415 RE: Estelle Towers Proposed Development Dear Mr. Runck: Luigi Bernardi and Ryan Companies have proposed a new mixed-use development at the corner of France Avenue South and 69th Street West. The proposed project, Estelle Edina, consists of two condominium towers along France Avenue that are anchored by retail on the ground level, and buffered in the rear by townhomes. A map of the parcel, along with a site plan, is below. At your request, we analyzed the impact on property values of nearby single-family homes as a result of the proposed residential towers and mixed-use development. Based upon our analysis summarized in this letter, it is our opinion that there will be no measurable impact on property values of nearby single-family properties if the Estelle Edina is constructed as proposed. It is possible that the increased offerings and improvement in amenities could be perceived by many in the marketplace as a neighborhood benefit, which could increase property values, especially considering the already existing proximity to the vibrant commercial district. /1.y-a Shenehon Company I 88 South 10th Street,Suite 400 I Minneapolis,MN 55403 1612.333.6533 I shenehon.com Member of the American Business Appraisers Network•F£O!Affirmative Action Employer Mr. Carl Runck Page 2 July 28, 2017 sZ� d o '''''3.4''&' ac o I. '' ,. ,. W 6St6 5t O > �c uT SI 77 66th St __ W.�66Sh St ik. 1 Like Corneliar 1 �11 .$�-_,� I I1ri,- d tI JJ Or -I!,+ fanz lid �, ;7 0 Edina l';'7;4,1 1 } W .k.1/, tt ❑ -_-77—.-7: I d I' 1 I wer Rd . a ; Cornelia vark g' "Hazelton Rd 1 � '7k. 72nd St W ,t'' iT ll �� ;' deii 9t�i( - (j m w n i Dr _.- { 4e arkteewa Ii c \. t '''''C' ' 'l+ ! RESIDENCES , t'' ,p SACK OF HOUSE/LOT'," ??? _ !LOADING 1 PARKING �,. LNTRY r-r,,ruux.l.� 'z ,1' , 4;* : , , 01... (ke,`-' , 1 ,,,,, , , .. . , . . ,„,„,..„,„:,...,.,,, ,,, .T_ i ...4- ,- .., 1 .,....„.. , . , 1.,, c- .. ..L!.. , i TC Ih `vox,••e�.M u^_,.,,,„.., ?:., . ,-,top„ , , 3. , LOP - " , . L'TITRv I I,.II_-c 4, RES•LLN,LS ' - x. , • _ _I__ ' LOBBY!RETAIL/BACK O •�+ i;»' HOUSE/LOADING 'R'r _ !. L'' IL_ MC;r3RCOtJR1'. 4, - i _ LL• 1 POTENTIAL ELEVATED T __— C" '' P e4" CONNECTION TO i -1 • ^- `' i'.I.Ii-il.:a:l GALLERIA A- l3 Mr. Carl Runck Page 3 July 28, 2017 IMPACT OF PROPERTY VALUES ON SURROUNDING PROPERTY Neighbors may be concerned the mixed-use development will affect property values and ruin what is now a peaceful environment and neighborhood. This is no different than the initial concerns some neighbors may have when a residential subdivision, office building, solar garden, or something else is developed on vacant land. We researched issues relating to property values and found no conclusive evidence that suggests the proposed mixed-use development will diminish property values. In particular, we studied visual impact including views and shadows, noise, and traffic. We briefly discuss each issue below. VISUAL IMPACT The client is proposing a mixed-use development which consists of two condominium towers along France Avenue that are anchored by retail on the ground level, and buffered in the rear by townhomes. As proposed,the two condominium towers, situated on France Avenue, would be twenty-four and twenty stories tall. Neighbors are concerned about the visual impact of the proposed development, which includes, views and shadows. The nearest single-family homes are approximately 450 feet across Valley View Road, with existing mature vegetation as a natural buffer. Even in the winter,the woody parts of the trees and brush will provide screening. The towers are planned to be situated on France Avenue with low-density townhomes along the back of the property as another buffer, along with additional landscaping. The townhomes will only be three and a half stories, with private backyards that will provide more buffer for surrounding homes. The towers have been designed to taper as they rise,to limit shadows on surrounding properties. The client has already performed shadow studies showing minimal effect on the neighboring homes. Mr. Carl Runck Page 4 July 28, 2017 TRAFFIC AND NOISE Although the proposed development will bring more car and foot traffic to the site, we believe it will have a nominal effect on surrounding single-family homes. The development proposal shows the main vehicle access point on France Avenue, with two smaller driveways on West 69th Street and Valley View Road. As a result,the majority of the traffic would remain on France Avenue, and not affect the neighboring single-family homes. Finally,the surrounding single- family homes are already near a highly commercial area and France Avenue, which has high daily traffic counts, according to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. In addition,we relied on the Traffic Impact Study conducted by Spack Consulting for the purpose of determining traffic impacts associated with the Estelle Edina development project. The formal study concludes that"the redevelopment adds minimal traffic...with a negligible difference in queue lengths"at surrounding stop lights. The study found that"the proposed redevelopment is expected to generate approximately 1,464 new daily trips"on the surrounding roads. Assuming most of the additional traffic will be on France Avenue,that constitutes a nominal increase of 5% in daily traffic(1,464 new trips/28,500 existing traffic count=5%increase). We conclude that the proposed development is in keeping with the surrounding commercial district, and would not severely alter the existing nature of the neighborhood and the nearby homes. The conclusion is the same for noise concerns. Most noise from increased car and foot traffic will be confined to the France Avenue side of the development. There will be more foot traffic as well, but it will be contained to the retail and restaurant options along France Avenue. We don't believe there will be measurable noise generated from the residential towers. 4' gl ,e \ ij R 1,1 Ba \, 130;; i ��, 14 o�r Ii ( jf/jt' (; Li 4:Miibefry_Ca....Qunbei" C -/ h 100_. - 8200 9500C it MnDOT Daily Traffic Counts,Existing as of July 2017 /44J Mr. Carl Runck Page 5 July 28, 2017 MARKET RESEARCH ON PROPERTY VALUES We conducted market research on single-family property values near recently constructed large developments in the West Metro. The goal of this market research was to determine how single- family home prices are affected by large development projects. We identified six recently constructed towers that are situated near single-family residential, and researched home sales four years prior to and following the development project, within and quarter mile radius and a half mile radius. 1 2 3 Building Optum Tower 1 Optum Tower 2 City Bella on Lyndale Street Address 11020 Optum Circle 11000 Optum Circle 6600 Lyndale Ave S City Eden Prairie Eden Prairie Richfield Stories 8 15 15 Height(feet) 138 238 177 Year Built 2014 2015 2004 Distance from 630 1,000 460 nearest SF home (approx feet) RESEARCH & FINDINGS Number of home 51 43 225 sales in study Years studied 2010-2017 2011-2017 2000-2008 Difference in home sale prices before vs. after development 0-0.25 mile radius -0.4% 24.9% 30.9% 0.25-0.5 mile radius 8.3% -7.6% 26.4% Mr. Carl Runck Page 6 July 28, 2017 4 5 6 Building Gramercy Park Coop The Lakes Apartments The Edgewater Calhoun Street Address 6711 Lake Shore Drive 2622 Lake Street West 1805 Lake Street West City Richfield Minneapolis Minneapolis Stories 12 8 6 Height(feet) 125 N/A 83 Year Built 2000 2015 2005 Distance from 230 130 30 nearest SF home (approx feet) RESEARCH& FINDINGS Number of home 186 96 183 sales in study Years studied 1996-2004 2011-2017 2001-2009 Difference in home sale prices before vs. after development 0-0.25 mile radius -6.5% 14.9% 21.8% 0.25-0.5 mile radius 42.5% -0.1% 20.5% Based on our market study, four out of six projects had a significant positive impact on surrounding single-family home sales within a quarter mile radius, with rising prices in the four years following the development versus the four years prior. As a result of this relevant, current, local evidence,we conclude that there will be no measurable negative impact on property values of nearby single-family properties if the Estelle Edina is constructed as proposed. In fact, our market research supports the possibility that the increased offerings and improvement in amenities could be perceived by many in the marketplace as a neighborhood benefit, which could increase property values, especially considering the already existing proximity to the vibrant commercial district. 'E1 Mr. Carl Runck Page 7 July 28, 2017 Along with local market research, we reviewed articles written about similar projects around the country. We referenced several studies and have summarized their conclusions: Study: The Impact of Commercial Development Surrounding Residential Property Values By: Jonathan A. Wiley, Ph.D., Department of Real Estate, Georgia State University Conclusion: "...retail development is the most likely to be considered a neighborhood amenity and an important aspect to community revitalization...Perhaps most surprising is the lack of evidence for negative and significant impacts of commercial developments on housing values. Scores of political arguments to the contrary are voiced at local debates across the nation, yet this research does not find substantive evidence of a negative interaction." Study: The Impact of Multifamily Development on Single Family Home Prices in the Greater Boston Area By: Arah Schuur, which was written in pursuit of graduate degrees in Science in Real Estate Development and City Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Conclusion: "In the four cases..., no negative effects in the impact zone were found." Article: No, Large Apartment Buildings Won't Devalue Your Home By: Alex Cecchini, mechanical engineer, for Streets.MN Conclusion: "...Five of the seven studies found dense development, including affordable and market-rate, had negligible or positive effects on home values." Study: Examining the Impact of Mixed-Use/Mixed Income Housing Developments in the Richmond Region By: Lisa A. Sturtevant, Ph.D. and John McClain, AICP, Center for Regional Analysis, George Mason University Conclusion: "Overall,this analysis of mixed income/mixed-use house shows that the development have positive impacts on the surrounding neighborhoods, with relatively strong home price appreciation and lower crime levels...The home prices and assessments of nearby single-family homes were not adversely impacted by the presence of mixed income/mixed-use developments." Article: What Does That New Luxury Building in Your Neighborhood Mean for Your Home's Value? By: Devon Thorsby, US News Conclusion: "If the area's up and growing and there's a lot of activity, and it's making the area better, it should make home values go up." (Matt Nixon, COO, Pendley&Pendley Appraisers in Cumming, Georgia) Mr. Carl Runck Page 8 July 28, 2017 Book: Real Estate Damages: An Analysis of Detrimental Conditions Chapter 3 Case Study By: Randall Bell, MAI and Orell C. Anderson, MAI Conclusion: "Based upon the paired sales analysis, no correlation exists between home values and adjacent... shopping centers." CONCLUSION Considering our research and findings, we conclude that there will be no measurable negative impact on property values of nearby single-family properties if the Estelle Edina is constructed as proposed. In fact, our market research supports the possibility that the increased offerings and improvement in amenities could be perceived by many in the marketplace as a neighborhood benefit, which could increase property values, especially considering the already existing proximity to the vibrant commercial district. Respectfully, SHENEHON COMPANY IST/ ,9d Robert J. Strachota, MAI, MCBA, CRE® President, Shareholder Minnesota License No.4000882 Certified General Appraiser value@shenehon.com 410 I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved. 4. I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding the property that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. 5. I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 6. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 7. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client,the amount of the value opinion,the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 8. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. 9. I have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. 10. Katherine A. Ostlund provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this certification. She gathered and verified information about the property that is the subject of this report, and gathered and analyzed information on the market conditions for this property. 11. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 12. The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. A5-6 13. As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute. ;Ple,(f Robert J. Strachota, MAI, MCBA, CRE® President, Shareholder Minnesota License No. 4000882 Certified General Appraiser DATE: September 20, 2017 TO: Estelle Edina, Owner and Development Team 6900 France Avenue CC: Cary Teague—Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE - Director of Engineering Charlie Gerk, PE— Graduate Engineer RE: Estelle Edina, 6900 France Avenue— Development Review, The Engineering Department has reviewed the project narrative dated September 13, 2017 associated with the application for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. No detailed plans were provided or reviewed. Details 1. A Developer's Agreement or Site Improvement Performance Agreement may be required for construction of public sidewalk and utilities. a. Deliver as-build records of public infrastructure post construction. b. Plat public easements or transfer fee ownership of dedicated public right of way. Survey 2. A proposed site survey is required. a. Show all easements, public and private. 3. Apply for vacation of existing easements or right-of-ways if needed. Living Streets 4. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. 5. Sawcut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Traffic and Street 6. Continue to plan for E-W and N-S connections through the 6900 block of France Avenue. 7. Maintain sidewalk access or provide sidewalk detour during construction as approved by the City. 8. Clearly denote private sidewalk. Maintenance for non-public sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. 9. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. 10. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Consider truck overhang when proposing plantings. II. Work in France Avenue ROW will require a Hennepin County Permit. Sanitary and Water Utilities 12. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. 13. Clearly indicate private vs public utilities. 14. Northwest corner of site has sanitary trunk line that would likely need relocation as part of plan. 15. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer's engineer. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 4sa 01 if •�yyti t� 16. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 7. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. 18. Re-routed sanitary sewer must have a capacity analysis completed on existing and proposed flows. Analysis must be reviewed and approved prior to permitting. 19. Create north-south water loop from Valley view/69th to 70th along Valley View. 20. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with public works. a. Separate meters for fire and domestic services will be required. 21. A SAC and WAC determination will be required and Met Council and City REC fees will be calculated from the determination. Storm Water Utility 22. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report. 23. Part of this site drains to CWRMP subwatershed LE-34 which has significant flood concerns. Limit runoff to maximum extent to LE-34. 24. The wubwatershed NC_I 19 part of this site is subject to limited flow in high water conditions, and Valley View backflows through this site to the west toward LE-34. Remove backflow condition and temporarily store flood water to release off-peak. 25. Provide more detailed information for retention system. 26. Evidence of watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed is required for building permit. 27. Retention system engineer required to verify construction of the underground retention systems done per plan. 28. Confirm retention system or drive isles are structurally designed for Edina's 80,000lb fire truck load and outriggers in parking lot areas. Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 29. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site permit is required. Other Agency Coordination 30. Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit is required. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371 •Fax 952-826-0392 LOGISMap Output Page �v•Ew CO INA YOWIts Page 1 of 1 CetPet iii Pia(I SII‘t.4 MP IS) (111) ss I =LEE, 3 0 _ Q Mr ST HO MdANAYE2 •NGEAVES1 ,\-miu i ' 10 . a orillw , ckW. . i a 4 0 R6.14 SitY110Atf -,_ IN MC. . r. • 1 . Viii,p4m*" i sijoii7. 1 pm.; I t j • •t I,mil •1 .., l - t . v a, 0 6C �1M O 1IIINIIi Ii rV i, 4.mi: i y /A w =�l I 4 4144 ileklip �1 --- uast1 7 AM.. ., 5 ( is) 1 ...) (17) MIME" { ff 1 ■- ■■:■.�� Mill Intl' itiiiihili C .■...;��c■■; wl'. qb r {����.�1�i • ..i mmo■•■. L .. ; ��_ : : II SI El :: ir ■ ■ _I (ti a :Cr"!47m. irilAVA,+ I:: i:I: Ir �� �� .440-4,440,44„.,: , i?....,.._:...nr.m ,_ . sw....... Irn 44:44,44441 1 o Liz dm 2Aeal.1 ommirWilliii X AAtsapat,tzi mi• grzrameedai mos 411, . (VS) - -. lH..I..I .. � - beittim" mom EN. .. ifiviciiimios aro� ±� ■ ■ 11��tri�iiii�r x �, •. is, 11. 6 ll inaiii'M iilii■l mfini inPl ^f .1 z!U S )ano.L..2 b milijka ji 1.,,'1, el 1 n ��„,_.__,.,, ,. , , • 9■1■117 . wil � ■ E _' EN „ ”=■ ill II' _ f{P ' 111. ca. .� 1.2:.„--- ..,„ Ito G s REus ift4 4) ,NN PAIK (,) PiAzA ( I") v I . .• i r • _ 11 .S ', a' I'llor , , forpe, -,-,,,. tim,„!, i ;t. ,, ,,,.: , 1„.,.,,., _,,, i i l ''l . .4 y. . , ',6,, .... , . , , .4.-, ,.i ' `q• rvFl Int �,, �� ii 4.1",,Z!":,, r i / . -.113 SIMI 1- • Er k , , - �i ` .. . , „ fir: . :„. , ..„, ,, , y�]k 41���iii��� ` k Cu � 1' i F; iirrq "LI .i ira � ( I T.V . ' 1 ira..•' , dr.,. f.,. fir ;r' t :, "� z a • `A rA.,.n ,,� 1 III • ; gm ,,,..;:;,,.41.;,,,..," fit" , I `•f 111 �,,,‘. ' " li :'Eyq l .,„e,,,,,,,,--°A ' ,,' (' .4,74*.•'',. ' • ( Y'''''‘':'t.,.. i' . '''''''' 6 . . 4, 44:1•,..,', .y.'.,,,,.._ 4, ''''',":",:4,,,,, JA9 .'4.• .0IW Oa tAt4 ....4,1,17.:Ai .4-1 , , , . ',•., J t11111 41.110 go '-',-, '. ' ' :::: • ,, . . . : ., ,..t..,;:,..,... • 1. 1 'NI aWil _._ ..t :.f;:,,,,.1,,,*)..,4(-;., ,, . ;, ..il .'•#;e4'''." ' '", t . a IM li 1111 • ! .'''t''',,',-*'.'.. C. . I 1 Ili . . II a 111 111, a IIII . ..., ., II III • 1111, 11111 '';'‘', -.. ' .',":„.., ...f. - ' .., 1 , , ,. -,,, '..f4'''A . a a a a 11/ '' '' :••;,... ' ,.,;4 il , i., ,4t1, ,, 11, 111 la II ill it'''4. '‘ II • . i ' ' ' ' \*4.I i \. f , ,.. ': .: ! 'i":.r. •', III . III • M a . • , , . . . IM521111•111 a III a 1 IIIIIMIN1111111 , \' ., 111111EIMIMIE III 1 i li ,IIWIllit -4.... , 11111•1111111111111 ' NIMINIIIIIIIMMI r , - -1 INIMIIII=1111 .., IIII IN illillir -111101111111=1111 ,,',, - - • ! c.' 1111;11111=111 ' H utasmausi I , • , tr-) ' i - .. ... . : a 1 i ' ;'1111:1:71:1:- 24* an"' 114401' 1 ti: am . '. • 11, .,... ,.. ow ,,,._„ - "".:.,", .,,,• ,):. „ ' '' -;'7-3,- ,..i. i • ' ' 2: 4 -4, , `k""- •-. , . •. I ; ,ti: ' . . a,4, i, -4." -la',-, ,, • .'" ,i• "...•) 4-4 , r‘; ,•,, i .° , ' ir.r•-•(,-. .,;.,,,,, fg. . ' ''.-'''.; -1.':;:,, I I . 1 ' ' pi ... ( • , - ', ''''''' • !,;',,''''' ''' . - ':. . , . i . r , .' Pit i:i ;5. Irilleti i " ' ''.. ' I ' ' ".•.,', '.;:': I' / t , ' • / • '' ..,,:,.,, ,,,.,... . ili CL 0 i . ' • ,,,, (,,,• , :, • . , ''s. '''•.. - iiiii .11.•.,A,:,,,,1,44.,,,1 ,. , 1 . . . .. , . - - • . .. - ., f I .. ....- I i . 4.i'• itg - •2.. :.... . ... . , . ,... -....,, ... . .,..: 1 a . ,i'i,, . - •4 . •:. '.,..Oa i;!irf,,,-,t';'' I ''.... - ., vAl 1 M • IN IN \,, ,!-• \ --, ,..._.,„.,!,!! , I I II N ..... 1111 I I I , , . ., , .. ... . .,„,,,,, ,. . Aril_ ,, . i •, ,,,, • , . 1 I ! ._ 411 - II I _ , IP • _. .,..,,,,. 1 6 : ' V--.1-)\,‘ • '.,, IL',',!,! y 1 . f ' 3 . . . , , .. , ,... • a 4 0 ' ,•// '..- • 0 . a : , 1..•• /.i . • ..,.. _ \ / ..,...-. . am iii . a I I 1 •i I .f. I I ... I I i .. 7 --, .- • 4.4 ,, 44 .1. C . _ - ,is ilik:.s ' . i iii . „ „ '41 . . ''.. , . . 6) 0 , , .,„,-.... • 1 0 ,,--, ..,,. :.',i - . '';',;',7''...".":....".1'• 10,°,-.• ,„: . ',.,'-":..:.' ,...i• L''` ..:- #:".,,,,.'..•.;.: a. '''• - .*,•' -:, ', ,. . •--....,-,rify:, . ..1, . ,.. ........ _ _ , - .... ... . Atrr ..... ,, _ „, ... .... ., • :„... .-....,,,...-. . • , • . ,,,, _ _ _t,....,,. ., ‘1•4' • ... Of,' :,...4.-t-' ' . -...-r •- ,. IIIilSiltr: ''''' '''' '' -J'F'-`*.,* - ;:;''''.4;I..' .. q”, ,•, ' EH . IP.'' •, - —-• ---— - - - ' ' mo gm es 1.,.., N„,....t.,6,v( " ,,' 44', .'ik l''. !:•44. 4 ii 1 47 i4-4'a - IN :4; 4 A'„ '.'''. .--!!!:',...',...]:''' .-:. -, i, ,, ,,' ,, ,,, '''' .g. as , ql, 't i i AA 11 • .. 1 . • ',.. • •- . . ,..„, ..,.,4 ..., ----34......)..,•-v,..,-...,..,:-...:,---=.4.4014;,.-...:&...,..... '-'\:•;.,;!,..„,,.s.'", '...!:, Ali ., .... - .4(,... . . . „ ....„... ... , ,, .. . . . . ,.,' . . - ' • ... :.'.'''':':'..S1'40,4'.'%.'‘,'''''''' '''' r , - 4 . ''',..-. .- -• .. ----...., . . '... '....•-.....,--- •„.,,,-..0.41....,..,514,..'...);..14.1.1...,': ',,, i ... • „ .: --.,I, 14 , . i (1) ' Ni • *V • • , w cu , ,•fl * ii q__ -1-, .," • 1 r• : • ,,' . '4 t , 1 • , . '1 - -. . 1 ...0 1 I 4...° 1 1.- '( '* 'Air; ' 1 ' CD - - • 7' . , l 1 , 01) .. , \ \ 0) . .. . 0 .. , . ,-..,,.... , ,, . .'; ,',1:‘!./..ik'.. , • . . , I, r li',-..'"r;,,-i...:41., -, i , ,..., k , . , -t,., . ... .-: " 1 - . ,:. i .., . ._ IA% r 1 No ow --1 - 3 in "" a L. 141.4 ,i;,04.a: ` PI E- , • lo II 'I•J , ° I 434 1 I „,, ilia ! t `4 / \i'4 jiitT / . '11! 1 'c u ,: w ` 41 .i-; immac4s r1 1 �,,, ,t� , { ,,,1Ai %' r-` � I • . " +" j'�t r. mitt !'`� ! ' �11r. yl ,y ' /} J1 _ " w 'La>< 'i; ;.. yq.: • �, � }D.a 40 1x d ' '3f " .� r _ wrT ; I , 1Hz+ „ r� !1 li • \ \,.,,,,,.:i'''::,,:44's,* 7 h„ r i '''1. 1::. j ': ':: �.1.,...,-•- '. +1 .mil;',,..: i.'1,1.--: ,::4�' :.I'Z 1,.i. J S '11:3 �> t,..+1 :7 1411 r .t ' '.� � ;:,,.:./, , r,-,:i.';',, ',.:.,.., .'.4 .--A 47,- . .'„',, 1 1 ' s,N,i y'4'., f It �WII :', �R+' • /�+ 1G ' ` ' `• , r ,r, y .>J Pj�i,l,p:,;; 1 _ f'4i '. 6 err ' k ‘ ,,R 1 .;, MI ; e j� • a, Wit"- ;. , ,, i ,.;> Y �, , r - t , 4. tie Iltfebilt" .„ ,,.,.,,,,,,,,:e2X,i ..,,k .. t r • jk . r T i L4 ' — , -.4v4, L.."..i , ..- .-,,?. _-*pi i 1 t , 4 •444.14. ''.r-7T- ', Ot:, 'A . •.k.4..' i \AI/I ' a 1 . L _ _ , „ : - * laitaNiailliaiiii01/111 , Gt rMg t 1 - � � L.=-L�.. . .� ,off 1i I t-t. .11:- g 1 ki.: 4,,, - , ., ,,' , .;,..,„:,.. „,,,,,, _, 4.tk.',,, ', ‘ ; 0.. -'''li Aol;,' i 'ice �r . r . , # *„• ' .. ,', .;,',.. , ii, t ; • : ' CV:* . '-',,' IC ' ' 4 "1/4-;;e'' .; . 1 ..,-74., ''' itiin 't1 I t; . :. F , w; lii 1 A ! , .. \ \ . ,. , . ., 1 to �; .. J 1 I x ;4 I ' . t , • *(� r 4 . r, .r `.* ,,ter 3� ,,I 4.4/ L^., • ,,I c.. 1 14 s •'� a�a'?;p .----:*"1,-...•;74,:• ''', ..'` 'C^•.•t:'>",-'7".S......'.•....'...G`'.. _ . ,.. .,,14:„.* 2",,...t,,,;'-',.''''''r.' •,*";.''''',: ;,..,30' ,. ,'"I.,'•'' . • V. V 4 , er: 1 . ? 1 . . 4./0441,ei ' 0 — • . 1 4 • .- i I „...... i.,,, /.., lif ii •,,,r., , . . i . ,., • I r . ,,.., e ,,) , r, , ., ,. I”. , , , . . ... „. R • .4 ' ( * '-- , 1 , . %,:.': 3 \ r '_ g \ I' j:4 ), . 0 1 , .'1/ • I . . :''*.#4', ..!1, 1' ' \'ii- i t k 1./.:-X'4.' ..3.;,/,'"' • ' Ad J \, \\ . i , 0,,,of .,.,tr... k.,,• A ., A ':; .' itilf , • .111/, 1(#,41,,i /175,Y. IA'•;,, . , 0; , i.,,,,,,•„0,-,,-,i,of,,,, i. ,;'''ir: E ,,,:'" T , . .'r,,'' , , :0,7 • . yel`tj'Al i):', 1°' ' i ,,,,,itlii :04,4#A,•14'..,, ,, I i., t. . ': • r - ,.. ...ii".c.0.4.v . . 1, .1 I . i ,,i, Ji ,w;,c'0 1,,,,,,r1 t. i , v r...,.i . . .. ,.t,... ..., . ,r,,,., 4 7 i ., 1 1 , , • IP . . ' . . ' Ai..i. • 1‘ k.,f4-,i-Ai 41:'-'*:: / '' 0'.14,1;;CI:'''',\ ,,'.?.I''..*,.:Y.?'P''''' 1 • - _ I 4 . , F9,1 . ' ' . . r,I4 IR v " ' i' t ;;,,'''-',-',•• -'� tit ...., - rt9 ,. w _ t t +' 1 \ a - ,Y3 it y fikY •g 1, h. .'. a ,w c• t. ret , �jIszA; 91 i• . q. w ,, 7 , , ,,i� .� ci . ' Vw ' \%.&\% • 'p�� f lrrpp:: ,-: .4: ,•:-;.7'1'.. ' ''''' .:.e'•'''.'il.'' Ili . t.,.„.. 1 1 >cf #L� i " r#t. --T— . � . _' .. K .` c"fid ,..t'`i \ A ray` , .I 1 ilk, K I 0';it, • Z1'`\ y , .' p w .' .a.. yr Y.,, r." -77.71.-..(q 1 i M" it! � , 4 . I 7� :— ¶ 4\. -. ,,;.:,:: .:kv..p.,. . -,...44- ;,... . .t:* • •ttx ! 'I �j j wr ` -.,.P "S9iir sus f' 471 4, r ..,:4•;-,,,S" X41' {I 44,E '•/',,,,,,,','"..' ... ', , . ' 4:,‘',.,,''' . , ''....' ".z4 ' ..,, ,.t,' .. =� • • • y - . ''''t. -. L . . 4.4i,i. . ,..;?t.. .t••''''.i•.-,„.., I n -.{ r;. ' y • t ' f I• , _ q is .h A,,1ii `1 1 • A I. TTTTTT 1 Qn'\k., 1 .,. , , „,. ,,./,, . ;• e... '4'4''.,,,:sii. tk 'lit 1.1'.as - 1 Sitf•t if,Yillor ii A•01':^. ,', tjb h pip . ; ,••• ...di,,,,,i \‘''1.4,6.1"...;--,k.a,h ,;;; ' kr • , i iF ' '.VP, "?.= . l • - ., .1,.. r 4”, •1; ,1.4,1 14 le' '%l7212,10.* t• 1- 1 ' I- ./ % yv,,,,,,, r• 44.: .. na%., '1,;. ,,, * r.4 '14 ii'h v ",-; -'' ''N A *4 • 44-, .: , j-' 1.• l'A .. iet''11\44. \‘ ,ktli r. , t IMO, .' qi•t, .", e k;. , ,,,;4., , se i ir , 1,,,. , •,.1 ==lbs41 I , 4 V) ' •"1 A' 1 I dr& 4•S1/4 • Volt r 1`Vt 4' IV -7 111 ir ; \ILI'fifitil ) -\\tiv-i....,.41 •.:1.4;4_NOP'4. / , -AI . ...r.F"-° 5 _.--- r...-r . 1 ' A Y 146 ' i :1 SW 40' , ' --70111.0P* / 4_,,... ...in .04 ,,, e VA,, 0,4: • a ' r ' ,I,s,'.;`.4;• 'NI Ilk .+ .) . .. k e t .,, .•ri ik, r.. f'0..1 , 1 -.Ail 4lairs ...• / / k 1 r f s. i .-t .,, 44,i'v i'•“4, 4, .111 'W4'''ky,.!fir-c‘ 6 , i -- t r ,.„4,... .. , ,a '-- • 4*Niz.,4 il 1 , .-4/...,. - ., - • .el , if , i / ' 1 , i - ••••-:,.,g!‘ 4 3* e ' i',<4qi 4 hilitkoarA1/4_ f\ r ,,,....,./V,1 / •), . 4,/ rr / / 1---1 . .. ‘ ,- • '‘W‘aLk, . i.- ' Al' I -I / ...i ,,,.1-I....I-I roi „-$ ,,, 771 1 :' • .r'1,...14\ 7N.VS. / , •• , .,.,V e . a'SL4 T... ', •i or) __/- -1 ,r7"..7 1 I i 1 - ' 'IL--'' l' • ..- .... : \- 1..t'...'•' '4 'C'St -.- / ,r----/ . ,•,‘ .A,&IV 4.- ,otrtry.,,. , , :,.&.„,,,,p,,..,,,„..,,,,...„4. ".i.4.- . • , / ' / , ! !. 1, . . . '' 40 T7 14:4qiiVilii?t4 i 1 / ' f 1 I ; 14'.s 4' i 74 yi ilLii,,,i kilo' _ „ji ;4 ....,: 7',la, ii i , . ,.... 1,.. ". _,,..„„:, . • . . 7 . ii, 1. . ..!7` ' P,., • ‘a, A if,; 4 Mg .1- / ,/ / , .., - / / / / 1 ,•4 ,,r•.44 ..1,yrrien 007i %/,. .,.,.4" 1 / r --11 ,...:1 4 1*.• , 1" - " , ,01 .i1.iv,1s A.re...fl'.(A.•f.''7 ,..,. i I t //ro / i i /-J./.- / t- ---- irr--- 1 i i - — .1". 1 ,...„,,I I 1 I i /1 / / 1 – - . -.-, • .. .,..,,, . Si / / / I 1 211 ..s. ,ffi 1 ..• , r, I - I r,-lug, 4/r.....a....,....../. , 4416 ' 41141041.44,, 111.111C1 MIX*33, 111111111°'' 1111111"\ 111111111.407H:-. 7:":, l'Ailf.:',f4:1:f, ,. .....,- 1, .0 ,..;',,,,-• ilik °SW link NW IN& IMPO MIL MIL 'vow Ism loss mom Ink 1111111 IMMIL iiiMil 11111111W.* • ... , ..„ , ' :'A' • : • ;• '' .../. mow, ,./.... ..,Imm/ MUM. 111111111Mi ,,,„. ,... S sS 5 RAW WNW 111111116 MRS, 5 -, 5 • "Iniba 1111%. 111111k low • — , am"'44, "441.16,**, '4"00,..o. '""Now,,,, momm*. _ SO i . . • • ',/ I ^A.111.11 ( f; • '. I, f �a COC- sTO Co V O CO 1...2. CD 111 V NC OD 6--CO co(0O n Co co r OC V Ln N c.2M Cn M N 00 (N N- .- r NNCO In�r�N I � H (0 C (I) i p O C)e-CDN- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6- 6-O v-N V N O T-T-V 0 0 0 N-v- 1-0 0 0'- W F 0 Q 0 Q CO 0 0 0 0 0 O O C)O O N-0 0 0 O O v-N CO N O e-O CO 0 0 0 N-n- O O O o 0 C a) a C 0 H 00 N-0.- 00000 00000 '-OOO.- 0006- 00000 n-000� 0 0.6 co 0 aa)) 0) o Cl.) 8 E o Q0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O C)O O O O O O O O O O O O O o 0 CD Q) (.7')LL 0 C V00000 00000 00000 o00oC 00000 00000 00000 (6 a) L_ J LL LO C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 It F, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r CO r a �+ O c Nto 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00 00 0 U CO ' a) d . .. C L L O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O E• D c 0 00))(n ca 0 0 Z C O ` O 000 O 0000 O 000 00 00 000 O 0000 00000 000 O O V Z C @LLI- (!n _ a) 0 ca 0) LL .N �� I.L Q = 00000 00000 0 0000 00000 O0000 00000 00000 C� O� o 2 O• CD LLS ~ ` 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 OOOoo It 0 Q Q Y U 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O c.) p cd 12 0 X oa a 1:3.N. c 5 fl G) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 C� X J 0 0 a v QL w o a) CL Q Smi ((V C7 100000 00000 00000 O0o0O 00000 00000 00000 u) 01 IMM 03 LLI E O 2 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O C)O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O LL L F- = CD 0 CD CD CD = O0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 a) J C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 O O o 0 0 0 I- D N CO N-Na0) COV OMC O)COC V N coto CD NCDI-COCO rj22N [r MN OO) o T- T-'-� �M NNM IAS Cn ION-CO I- 4) ct E Q Q 0 CO 00000 O O O O O OO O OO OO N-N CO O N O C'•) OOO OO O O O O O 0 > a) a 0 a) .c L 0 0 0 0 0 O O O C)O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O N O O o a cup 0 <Z Ce U m a) U U EO ` OnN'tFS C) C)CO a O)t0 V'V N Q)'-C O)N CO CO CO CD M 7 M CD In O V M N CO iO X N r-M gr. ln� 0CI')I-O N O LL C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LU J LLI 0 0 0 a) C C)o 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 O O o 0 0 F w C o a) > z a)N2222 m 2`222 22222 a) m 2222 2222 a) 22222 m 2222 a) ■lift- Q 2 �aaaa0 <<<< <<<< <<<<0 QQQQo QQQQo QQQQo I — otooCH CD In CCDH otooCH CD LO CDtoN OCoCH OCCCDH OinoLH F•0.-M V Or(?V ODM C 0.-C.�)V O'-O) • ODM V O�co V 0 c CO NNNN NNNN CO M MC+) 7d"7 V to lnlnC COCOCOCO C c 0000 0000 0000 ooCCD 0000 0000 /14—:....__ (6 CO LL AtO W N N cO O N O in U) CO N- C-CO(0 N CA CA CO O(0 V V O V 0)C)CA U) O 01 C-V V I .—r I�f)O NO- N N N N N NOO Nm NN NN0 N-N 2 CN`0 2N;7,'El O CMOO C`n,_ I CO C U) r m O N�N U) Y-N V M0 V C)V.V N SCO V C)V CD V CO CO N CO CO C)M N CA CO V IC)N C/) H — 4 U Q y 00� N O�'-C)IO N T-CO N ON 00N CD O C)O C7 T-N c-,-IO O�.-O N 3 co as c U) /_ 0 U] N L 0N0—C) —.-C)0 Cn N N IO C)N .-V V ChN N V C)CO0. r CO N N N- W IO C")ION 0 oo en co U a) U> o co QN 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O CO fn LL H 0 C 4= 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 C6 JL L_ in C 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- I D T. 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 H u) , Q O C N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O U a U (0 c� • • • • • • • • C.t.. .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 a) a) > 0 C E �a O �� co 0 (—) Z o p ` O0000 00000 000Oo 00000 00000 00000 00000 Z O @LLQ Q)C/) 0) LL a."' .- -,-- 0 CO4t 00000 0000 0 000 00 00 0 0 0 0 0000 0 0 000 0000 0 C� o� LLU) U) O o V) O CU a) Ln 'T �� C00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 L) asC U Q < 0 U 7, 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0,-0'— 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O a m F V X � $a a �.� c •g a 4) N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0,- 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O WooCD 0• CO Q 0) Q� o a ng (°(7)Q lamCO Nr 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 II W 03 Fe 0 = 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 U. L F- = CD cD CD CD C) —= 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 N J C O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O I— D m N V CA 0(0 V 03 0-C)r C)IO c•)C-a0 COC)V 1.--C1 C)0 V CO C) CO 0a C) r C)CO .. y-IO r Cn C N t0 C)0 In C)N N IC)V V (0 U3 CO c0 CO CO IC) C)W N r C0 CO IC) F T-T-N C0 N NNN CA CS!NN NCA NNNN CA N N N NO NN co CO C)NN N' O a E C1 0 N O O O O O O O O O O —0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O a) ✓ > N U) a 0 m a) CL L C)NO V m NCO C)V In CO V Cn CDNr-NNI.V! C)N C)cnF V Is-M VCO CO C)F 00 U) a) Q z w a) U C8) 0 2 CA N O OO Nh V CAN V CD CO CON O C) 0(O C'7 N N V N-N IO U)V N CAO X Q (`LL O CO C0 V N Cn 0 N O V N O N CV V C) CO V CC CO CO Cb V O C)CO CV CO CO V c L r' N O N NNN W N N N N(A N N N N(A N NNN O N N C)C)r r)N N N' F. (6 a) LL ca _r '^ 4= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 'p V6 _I) J co EN O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 00 F W N2 2 2 2 l0 22 2 To 2 2 2 N 2 2 2 2 N 2 2 2 N 2 2 2 To 2 2 2 2 t0 ao N o Un I- o IO o lO H O In o In♦- o IO o IO H O In o LLD H o IO o IO F o Cn o IO F- �.=o.-C2)v o -C') O—r)v o.-r)v O M. O�r)v o7 C') VU COID CD N-r C)CD C)CO CA CA Cr;0 0 0 0 0 ,-,- N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 t••'O O O OC)0 0 0 O O O O r r 6 r cy cy LL LLJ itilf°1 �p OOMCD tD ON C0 N N M1�MCD CDN 0) CO NOS C In(O 40 C MO) C h CO M In M CO C CO CO In CN CO 0) 0)CD MC C N 01- 0)O)0)N-1n CD r NSC r F N N N N O N N N N O N N N N C) N N N N O N N N T-CD F2 F2 r C D (0 C CO m 0 Vr CO COC CD N C CD N CD C CD CDN CD C)C C)CD NON-V-,:t M O MY-h O N c-N CD (i) F y- y- U Iii' C Q CO 00.-N CO 00'-N M CD Y-0NM ,-000 r- 000Y-Y- 00000 000 V-.-- Cl) 03 N 0 y-' a C ,._^ 0 vJ N 0 C 0 in CO hMM 0) CO Co)u)C a0 CM u)CO CD N 0 Y-OM MOM C.- ON.-,-C 0 W CO cn N 0 0 e-CD ) 8 E (o Q a QN 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO TLLL 0 C 4= 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 CO JL ' E 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 F- 1 D +-, Q) x, 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00'0T- P- r-- U) rU) , aa C] C N N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y-0 Y- D 77 o N- a U (o M . . . . . . . • C.0 15 00000 0000 0 0 00 00 OO o OO O 0000 0 0 0 00 O o OO o a) a) a U) Cr }' co a 0 Q o Z 0 o ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O O o 0 0 0 0 0 (MO) zUt a) ``LL LL (0 0) 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 CO //�� i o \V 2 ~ ` O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 UCUNZ + ' •` >� a V QU m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O T- o m s U X 3a � �• C'5 a Chi cpp 0) CO 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 000'-T- X� 0 Q 2 a CD QL. N co 17). 1500000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 H W it 2 loo o o0 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 LL. L H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 N -J C O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 H CD CO n N O C CD0 O CD 0)N-C CO 000 0)M c.....!2: O)n CD M O O) NCA ON _ m CO P. CnN CD M CO CO M M CO CO O C1 CO CV MMM N O CO O 0)0)0)n C CO N CO C C F es,c., O NNNN 0 NNN NO) NN NN0 N N N CO ��� r N. N- a) E Q (Z 0 Cl) O O OOO O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O OOOO O 00,-0 T- 00 T-N N 1 N N a a) o CL L N 7 N N 0 M M MC M C CD M C CD N V M V-0 0r'00 000• OT-0 N M o <Z X (� U ` MNCD00 NIT h N CO)MOD C h00M COO 0)CO CD N 0)N- (Oh N X co r N CD Ti)M u7 r M CO CD O CD CO I-N M N N O CO O 0)0)0)CO C CO C`CO M M Q `LL L N N N N O N N N N O N N N N 0) N N N N O N N N y-C0 N T-«N- N c' N to H (O O LL C l^ � O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'p l// LLI-J 06 O N E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 Li] C : o N f 00 �2 f 6 rL �2 l C m rL �2 t 0 N rL rG N `�. < �aaaa0 aaaa0 aaaao aaaao aaaao aaaao aaaao C)(D o u)H o u)0 CD H 0 1n 0 ID H o 1n o Cn H o 1D o)D H o CD o 1n H o CD o CD H 1=o - "V O.--C!)C o'-C`')C O-M V o,-CO os-C9 V: 0.-M V tili'-' UCB (V NcV(V (7MM ) 4444 n D DCl O0(D0 CDN-f3 CD 000 DCO C a X0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 (0 y u u Mia r 'it 0C c)co u) O COO n CO CO h CO N O f`N CD OD r CV O h h MUD cf CO N CO CO N N N co F O N I y- C (r) m 0 00-a- OO,-O-- 000 CO CO cF CO F csi NCN— a)U a U Q CO 000 .- 0000 0 00 000 O N N c7 a) co D CD d ID v C Cl_) 0 VJ co 00000 00 0.- 000 ,- VVI CO (") W CD O cn r O) O Y a) 8 o co U 0 Qa) p ` 00000 00000 00000 0000 CO a) 05WN U C = 00000 00000 00000 0000 co L J LL. 1 E O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 co O O I- I D O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 Y-00 -C r^ r/ N- a y- O CN 00000 00000 00000 00 00 U cc) ..r a) CL .. .. . . .. Y L 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O0 0 0 O O O O O O > O m cu a) E CO 0 0 Z 0 o ` 00000 00000 00000 0000 a co LL +, _ I.L (A fn L.L CO s= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C� Co.- U J o CU �� 2 =u) ` 00000 00000 00000 OOOO U� �Z >2 m UQ QYCD 0 00000 00000 NhY- a (d v 12 cc c.6 c6 0X O Cl- c a C.,)D•N C'5 d C fhl 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 00 O O XJ a) Q CO O a Q L M� C7 x00000 00000 00000 0000 N O 11 (71 W a' E 22 0 0 0a- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0.-00 LL L 0 H V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O a) J C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O H D ip 0)vC)N-C (O u70)hn (`')hN CP V CD U) • o 77 O 1-1� cO C V N c0 C7 N N N 0 CON •T C F NON a) a v E a cl 0 CC 0 0 0 a-a- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 a-a-0 0 a) v ai'o > a) O a) a a a) cc =r .-000a- 00000 OOOOO 0v,.-CO OD U CD o rn N-a) o CD Q Z Ce -o U m a) (� U p ` m 0 01 OD CO CO CD n lc cn rNm O m 0 U7O� x C O f`f`n f D C R N c D (7 N N N O CO O CO• Q 5-U. L r.- ('7 V V O Z.-,-a-- a) LL ~ C (0 � 00000 00000 00000 0 0000 uJ W -J CZ CD a) a C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 O O 0 0 O 0 cc W C D CD • Z N 2 2 2 2o' 2 2 2 0 2 2 2 2 0 Ts + + u) u) Q �aaaa o aaaa o aaaa o o P.o o II a'- 000 V~ o`[)roiv H CD CD Ul U7 H CO (0 O 03 rnoiCirn 0000 c 00H c �0000 m o 0 (6 N- ,— r......I` 6 U) to a) U m 0 Q c a) us c , o (n 0 otS se0 03 Q> CO a) 0 C 03 L U- L61 1 ID' Out In Total a) :°� 0 2 2 0 1 1 N O 0 3 3 /A0,e 1 c `c v 0 N ,� l I `' 0 0 0 0 2 o U 0# 0 1 0. 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 44iik Right Thru Left UTrn Peds a) �J 1 LP O / t.) Z 0 a) Mt ..,I1 C ..-S a) a) co cc) \ C m. O IL VJ i1J .-o,-„, yo--- . 2 2 a° X00 d Q d 'v N< CO O Lt7 pC'N 000 Nt ` 0Lr,7 �L000 �N�F 0 4m. c Z a) ~ssCC 7 N. a 0Q A Y QC N Ni-_ 0001� �.. +y 00 L000 O-- CQ U -J oNNN4--. — - 0 c C ` , co I0 Ur c X O N �O co 0 0 0 5 fn LL 0 0 O O N N Lo L--). J O(� C� o 0 �r `000 NCNI I' ',1"0 N- N-Lo,__, Q L M w 111 4.,41 iq1 t'4o!21 sPad ` • 0 0 0 5LL 95 ` •• 0 0 0 l 8Z '\ /4> 0 0 0 4Ll 0£ �. °� I I • �c °� Nils sz z • 40Z OLl f�0 le1.1 u 1a0 E. ssaooy ails au E Q 0 a6 > 0 a) to O a) a 0 x U Q a a) s V) W 06 a) a) in O W C (1) I,; > Z 0 as ICW nip- N.- 1--- fO I N-CO O n OD M CD O M U) M CD N M D.-00 V M OON- M CO O CO M COV h O OD CO r N N N C C M M M N N C N N N N O C) i C C/) m MTt M M M N M M CAO M U)COQ U)O CO (/) 1 -N Tt N CO N CO 0 0. Q o M(400 V Ch OD -T-OT-MM O N O4.-O CO U)U) C r N C d �O V ,_F- Co) CD CD O O N N U)CD T-O N N C U)OD 1-0 M CO M U)r Cn CO 0 06 a) 0) 0) C11) ..-60 X000 U co U) N- f1 Q ‹ E p 7 0000000 0 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *OIL -FE 0 0 0 0 J O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 OCS a) O o LL in ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 I'• 0 0 0 r--, CD m O O O O O OD O O O 0 0 00 O O O O O 00 '^�'^ N.- F 0 0 0 vJ Q yCD C CV o• C 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 Q a) O O O U CD CD N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 .. . . . . .. C« L 0 > 0 . 0E 0 0 0 E D Ivo 0 co V 0 Z mLL 0000000 00000000 00000000 _ fB W H 0 0 +�-+ +' 0000000 0000000 0000000 o LL (A (n J o 0 0 d- o CU N 0000000 0000000 00000000 U� NZ E D 0 0 0 UQ -0 ,- 0L o O 0000 00 00000 00 00000 00 OM F o 0 0 U X 00- .0llmi CO 00000000 0 0 0 0 0 00 00000000 0000000 X_1 -0 .0000000 fl..4— co • ) 0 o 0 L M N C 00000000 0000000 cp 0000000 00000000 FM (O 0 0 O 0 W 2 02 0000000 0000000 0000000 CD LL =i- 0 00 0 .= 0000000 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 J O O 0 2 0000000 0000000 0 00000000 I- 0 0 0 D • g M U)co V r O CD h V CD ,- CD C)N O N M 0 U)Op O MNh V N CO M CO CO N M C NNNC) D) p MC')MN(N O) p NNNN0 C) Ci ) a E Y CL CO CYO 0 m � 0,-00.-.-0 o0000000 x200000000 a) ao) D oN 22 0 2 0 CD N 2Y g� g,r _ a a CD �CO L L a2v 'vCo NCD el V COMCO01D- Cp2O�NtIpMCOU)00 u0 (/) CD O o u') N N CO (O O W Q Z W Q CD O N ,-,- (,) 'O N C C CU o U O 2 v- p V OD NN-0 a,p-N U)NhCD N U) O)1- N'0CAN LU X C Oi NO V M O NOM N-NO N 2 a)1-M CD U)CO W M Q (`11 O G NNN CD p? Qm MCO co N NCO? 0_03 N 000? (6 O LL 20.5, O C 0 C C N p O W = <W0000000 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 N.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ,,�( J o 0 0 ,- y 0 0 y O W W N O E N N p 2z U 4) ` E00000000 LL 0 2000000 00000000 1- 2-E. co to N o N d O W ll .N._ �.�. G EC pQ<<< O= Q.�a aaa 7p2 CW CLCLCLCL 7Oa No o E--I ¢°2222 E"= ao N �¢ ,hootoo o=Ha > =ovo`r aH > 'aoLUM off O c6 � 5a > a o _ .> • 0 > a D 0CC)C)C) n II(N(N a IIC') a C C SSO000 COQ - 00«OQ ..,00004,,‹ Y Y 0 at0i OCOi ff' 0) N Ip-a N 0 F'o Il. W 22 22 22 AO) 4- f6CO r Cn up Cry Cl)CO C)C)t` 4-«O C) N4- NCD N C)V 00) ON C)CD N 0)CnN- I O N r. .--,- N N N V CD CO Cn Cn 0-4- f� r CO c -o 7 4-0 0 0 4- O N O N V 0 0 0 CD O T-CD 0 0 4- CD CD O O CD O C)V 4-C0 M 0 Ill 1` I- a Q) N N OOOOO OOOOO OOOOO OOOOO OOOOO O�O W N 4-4-V' '"' y N U a- C N 00 Q L O 0CD 000 O O O 4'-4- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 O O C)CC) N N f D > CSE m 06 QE O pCO000O 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 (f) 0 H _C Y N4-0 0 0,- CD N O 4-C) 00000 4-0004- 00000 CD N O C) 4-N C)t-- CD(0 CO J 1 C 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 1rt 0 a) 0 - r-(4-4-u> 03 000 C) 004-O.- 0.-00- T-00 T-N V C)C)V V CO CO C)Cn CV F v/ r 0 a N n N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 CD O r-N O 0 U co a � YL00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 D o) ( 0 Z tC 01 O M T-N N O V N O O O N O O 4-O 4- O O O O O O O O T-N- M N N C)O CO VT-CCD + L V N tall cp)0 (O U L ice) C 7 it y/ vJ LL Y St CD CD 0T.T- T-0 CD 0 4- 0 0 0 0 0 O 4-o O 4- N CD 0 0.- N N-N-T-Cr o 0)V C)O Cp O p i it0 0 a 2 7� E 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 U� �Z N U Q ,� 03 D < ""' . Y U �, 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00�0� O t6 F 0 3 C a V) a �•� C'j a. C`. 00a 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00-0— X a) a (c)6 m CL 00 • 2 P QL M ��N �ooOoo 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 I- a)wCe >.O 2 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a)LL -C CO H = 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 a) J C O O o O 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H D la C Cn 771- N V C) CD T--00 N .-O-N C C)Cr 0)t- h V u,CD N OO Cn,...4 ro C)� NC)V 1C) E' (1) ci E a 0 0 co O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C 4-O O 4- N N -o n. 0 +- as L T-0 0 0 T- O C)0 0 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-0 4- 0 0 0 0 0 O In C)4-0) Cl) -C-, NZ W -0 (n > E a) p 2 C)Cn V�T CO N.-C)�h ��OON �O�N V �C')C)0)CD r V IO0 V N V r V t� X _c a)u_ L " r—�.-C)CD NN C) co H IB CO , C ,max C O C O O O O O O O C C O O O C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 'p W Lii -J p Q 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) CC j 1.1J ra"'` > 2 Ea a a< 0 aaaao aaaao aaaao aaaao aaaaa aaaao ;a7 O in OInH oInOC H OC CD CD F- OC CD Lo H O C CD NH OIn O 6,I- ONOtoH �O.-C)7 O7 C) O,_C)V O4-CO V O4-C)V 0T-C)Cr OT-C)Cr ('6 �NNNN cV NNN C'')C'C)C) V V V R CDCp Cn CD CDCDCDCD .-.- 0000 0000 O O 00 0000 0000 000 O ..,..._ 41 __ >, > W n Y V I r-- •,-- , r �O 7()11(!)0) 23 23 Cb N- O� NN7MM Nr W 77 77ITN MNOD7-,;J, 7 I O)M N CO M OO 0 COO O to tt)r r 00 CO U)ON, 27 O N r NO'SCO N 00)ON F ,-,--L. ,-,--N CO ,_,_,-,-CO T-T-T-N n N N N CO N N N N CO N N,-N 0) C 1:5 a7,-'--CON MA N. 0)U)moi7 N CO A O�N.-N-O U)C OMNNU)D M0C24000 Nl' No 24 N LN , Q C) Cl) N T-N CO N41 O O I- ,-N N. ON N NT 0 CO CO LO O I.- .4.T-O O CO N NI..4.00 j /> O d 0 Q) 00N L COC+)N N 71- COM 0 N N r O N-O O)to N-CO COM r IO CON OCA,-N- 7 O CO O 0 NO)IOON 0 coCO O m ,_ Co N y-CO y- y-y-LO y-CO Y 0 `a)� E Co 06 < 0 ` Ooo o o 00000 00000 O O O o O 00000 00000 00000 (1) U) 0 LL H -C Y 4 CO 0O CO OO O V. OD Cr IO N Cn 4007 700 CD.4.NO V N.IO tO N O.-CO O V CO V CD NO CO 247 7 7 7 U) NN.-NIS N1� J 1 C O O O O O O O O C)O O O O O O 0 0 T-0 1- O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 1 F a) a) - M 777 C) N CD N CD CO ON N O7 COD- COO ON NCO CO 724 CO 0)0) CO UC CN F N CO 7 t O 1) CO CO 7 CO t) M CO N CO C V N CO CO 7 CO III C O C O C O h CO N.I,-C(7,4) '^ r r N N VJ r C N a 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0000 0 0 O N O N O.-Y-O N 00000 OOOOO 0 (O N a • LCD_ ..- co 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) Q) (ll a) O y--t OO a-, o 0 c I0 a Z L C 2 A 7OMD--- OCO CO N O N MN NNA ISM N(O N N 7 -O C; 7uO OU)TE,N cD OM C7 CO Li) 43) QL N O CO V.. `// Cl) ^ U ) 7 0)co tO V tv 0 O N 0 7 7 24 M 7 co N t`n O N co NT CO(A n-n CO N CO 7 CO 7 C ail • W.4- 2 O CIS LO E Ln ~ E 0—r-.-0 O——0 24 M0—O n .-y-COY-CO Y-CO CO OIC r'7 24,-0) M.-M�CO U"� =Z I- CU >2 C 0 Q Y 0 7, OOoOO 00000 00000 00000 0T-OOV- 00000 ' 0007 N o CO 'O U X 8 i �) a c ��� C 'j d 240 0 000000 00000 00000 00000 0,-OOT- 00000 -000.- X 0 -C Q.1'�" CO 'O v m COC °- Q.`V N� 0 as LE M N L 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 O Ill _Q a)W EY TO E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 CU LL L CO I- >> V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O J E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 F- D D L;Si CO N O-O N 0)N M C)CA r 1-C)O 0) 000N 70007 CO M h D) 0 t O 0)h O N OT-O t O(O O O,-24 7 24 0 r'C O 0) N 0 0 N 7 Ti, !ON-O M V-N V-O C O C H .--M ����7 ��c-�7 r ��7 .-���CO VN V: V-.6. E0 Q6. Q 0 0 7—0.-CO 0,-s-.-CO 0 0 N ON O.-.- CO O N N 0 7 00000 ONO.-CO N N N v a- a +, CO OL • O0 COOCO COC)CA ON NCA N NCO 7 NMOIO COOONC MON 7O CO CO to CAO NCD MCV N t) 7 7 T-7 '- V-N 0 N T,-C) V-,-T-.-7 V-.- 0 0 • 0 � Oz 73 • E °) .c T 2 2 7 W UDN o0 0)22 22 CO+)O 62g22 N 0O) M 2 O M 7 N M O N 28 CO 22 0))C)(0 O O On)Oii O x +; 0)u_ L N -7 ,-M T- NT V-7 .-«T-7 CO .4-n- .,1- To N H C4 CO > C Oej � OO000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 W -0J a) CO Q E 0000,0 0,0000 0--.-M 00000 O OO n-.- a-N a-07 00.-pa- a) it j W „"m, . ¢¢¢a ¢¢¢¢o ¢¢¢¢ ¢¢¢¢ ¢¢¢QOQQ0 0000 05 2 o o o 0 ,,ti T (� co()o )h ot)O La - o )O t)H 0 )o )H 0 )Oco I- O100 Lo I- oto O )H O -M V �fz..:t`h 0. M V N NCD O O 7 M.4- 6 O00)OO 7 M 7 O O O OO MV O M•u- eq N N N NO 77 M.t I lin � -t 0000 0000 000 O 000 O r-- N-. �p 10 W0)RR RR 1[)N0 W,*NR CO W h COO CO CO R• hN CO CD CO 0h CO 0)O) I ONN W rr W W W 0)N- N NN N 00)) N N NN O N W W W r 1O 10-012 mOmTi tiF U)« T- 1 1 (9 c N - Ot-NN- O)N CO MO W 000 NN O) MCO N-W Rt` 0M U)0)N- '''"—(°,1 ,*_W,* LL O N MMN� NMN M N M 4]W CO N 1010,*,*0 M N r-W 0) 10 .- M I- N N ICI- Q 0) Q) C N ,-N N.--CO Y-N O N 0 R N co V co co co O L 1- M CO N-Y-CO ,-N 0 N.-V T-O 0 . �"' N 3 Vd 0 U Q L co.-0)O CO .-O,*M W R CO R M0) N 1-1-0)W V-R R O ,*,-CO N-CV CO OR 00 0 m E a 06 E _ Q 200000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 CO C/) o 1.1_ I- = seC — C �R �h N ON W h 00.7,-0 R W N 0) h-M00)0) 1000)1- COR HON O) m a, N NN CO T-N Tv N. CO N M M MN- CO CO N NN- y-,-1- R T-T- Tr N CO m J 1 T C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 1 F 0 a) a - MCONO,- O W NN W U)N W W M t-W,*W h 0)N N O) MM0)N1` 01000),* m F CO r hh W h W W W CO N-W W 0)N 00)x000) W CO10' 1010 C),*W lO C')M,*CO `^ N N M MCV .--V/ T O a C CN 0 0 0 0 0 O N-O O r- N O O O N O O O r.'- 0 0 0 N N O O,-O T- 0 0 0 0 0 U M a N C L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IT E v O --(n cc 0 z 2 ,*,*W M0) W 0)N O 00)W COM 01.-.01,..0 N,*COON O,*I-M,* NOCO0)1- 2 L R1O1O1O0 1O1O,*1ON CO CO101-N W N-W W,- CO IORM0) RMNMM ,*MNMM V N a) co mLL C/) — :'/^) C/)4. O, ^^(0 -i-. 7 LL ( 0 = COCON R W MOON,- 010M,-CO 0)0 W 0)M O ROOM N-N-0)N- W MR ,* _se 0) C- o U y ,-—.-.-to y-y-y-R �� N10 n-N�,-N- T-T-T-T-10 �T- yrN • U) 2 J O CO 0= Lo ~ ` M W NM,* M W CO Cr CO O CO 10 NT-T-T-10 O V-'ON N N N N W ON OY-M U�amai mCz + T- co UQ < ` 0 , 00000 00000 04 v-OOM 00000 OON ON Y-Or'ON 00.--0,- N OM 0 X 0 oa a 5 cn c a -0,1. c '5 a` C 4. N 0 N p 00000 00000 NN-00C0 00000 00NON N-0,-ON 00,-0,- • X •J a 10iRICDof Q ( Q L M Cco 3 CD 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 IMM 22 iTi Lu 2 T2 7 o 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 mu_ L as I— > = 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 a) J C O O O O O 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 H N M W0 N) 2 W 1-) ))r M )W W O ON W O 0 N O)02 R OW M M W CO 13 n 1N 13 CO V O CC0l ') rT-v 0N N C a) E a 0 o N N OOON ,-.-ON,* 1-,-N OR ,-,-00N •-0,-,-C+) 0x'00.- ,-000,- N N D Ll °) -+J (D o wL L NM W 0)0 0,-000),- 0)NO)W M NNO),-0)Ch W,-W WN ht-MON 0100 W CO) to O 3 o rn T- N C >_ > 0 2 O)O O)M WN W M hW 0W Or n)O0o0)0 N W1M OWW CO W OOOR tM WWW CX ai LLWN N � ' C' N C..0 >CO ~ C 06 = 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 W -I w -0 a) ca —y NO ` .--000.- N'-ON 10 00.--0,- 00000 CD 00000 00000 N L1> LU r y N ftw G N 0-°0-°m O 222276 0-0- 0-m 222276 0-0-0-0-m 2222 0 222276 �O O aaaaa0 0 1n F O M)0 U F 0 O O o aaao aaaao aaaao aaaao aaaaaaaao ,s ._ in 0 F- 0 1O 1O F- 0 O CO F- O 0 O 1l)F- O 1O O 1C)F- ` 1ZO,-M,* 0.--M V OrM,* O'M,* 0,-M V 0.-M V 0s-M V (r N NNN C7 M ChM -;:i-R R,* COLL)1010 W CO W CO r hl-t- W W Co W ® Q) c 10000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 > W A((4 r` — p O U)4 O N N O V N N --1-C O f) V CD C O 0.1- "-- y0 0(D V V N M M M N! N 1 f) 0 O �1`N N r� H O 1 CO C -o m co r co U)N M N n M 10 00.-A-N IN 03 0 Q)N-U) LL ! 0 CO cr Q Ch 0 C N (p 7-7-.-O M 0000 0 000 00 N h 7-N-U)01 U) D r h h N 0 V LI) N N 0 d 0 QU (0 L V O O N 0 0 0 (O N(0�co 4_Q)(L) @ 6) _O) U) 0 0 > . f06 , r M a W CO Q 0O 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) O LL F .0 Y CV V In M,r cc) M7-hNM 007-07- tf)O)N(00)O,- W N ,- N•0 0) m J m m i ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O a-0'-00 O 0 I H O c) D - N 1-C)C) V NMN 0)C U''0) 1� V(O(O V M' O In '- (O M co(f),_ oi M O) C OCV a c 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 M V T-O O M 00 o U cO a -4= t 00000 00000 00000 0000000 co 0 Z a.. O At T-v-C V OMMr M ��N���� '^ t L a) a) co co- 1- r r r N is-- N 0 4-, C 4"* LL vJ vJ Cl_ V) = N-O M N- R,-,- N- M-N O O 0 M O CO N N CO • C - O C0 U c N (Toa) co(O�r- J m in I- O 3cl) ` 0 0 0T-A- O o 7-7-N 0 0 0 0 0 N-CO 0)N-00 0 O 0'llmi C Z + H N o CU a)2 co Q @ C•1 U Q,C 0 00000 00000 00000 7-oo�o N 0 6 o T-CD 0 X O c a N a -E� C'� d 4. u) (000000 00000 00000 7-0-00'-0 ��� XCO J Cl moo 7-CD a) QLM� Uw0yL00000 00000 00000 0000000 I gw w T2 ` 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O CD u t (6 H a" o 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O m J E 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 0000000 I- 0 M(0 1,...9(D 0 4)(0 V N-N N I 7-V V V U)M U?-N c V N .- r M 1n LL)MO W N C H U) O O Q EEO O N 00 000 N 0 00 N 000 00 h V'R 061T N 6) N V O O 0)M0 N -0 Cl- a m O 0 C L h N 0 0 C) V(`)M M M O N v O CO V CO LL)M U•-to M ��4--'' a)Z 2' 'a VJ 5. ca> O` 2 M N N O O O)M--sf M N u)n V N h M 00"1 c- X > CO C 0 y > O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O O O O O O O O O a) 0 Ko WJ -C3 6) (0 O O C � O 0000 00000 00 0 00 W M N(O O)N 7 U) a) z N2222 m X222 S 2222 To mo o + + YY `MEE...: ° -a.p 0_0_0_110 dd.ddp 5=_ .(0. E2VU ,21` > _O U)o(OH 001OI1 1- oLC 0 LCF- H ` N (6 2 7 HO7-Mv o.-Mv 97r?7,. 73 no00HH C -to o o0 0000 cQH (0 -0 co 7- (.2 o o Alt7 > LLICO ti ti co CC a) C) >, C a) 0 _ U ca > m oZSco L 6) ( ( N Valley View Road a) Out In Total U) I . 0 0 0 C p 0 11 11 /414p/ C N •0E. I I U p°1 0 0 0 0 0 lyo 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 11 •%p ® Right Thru Le� UT' Peds �� °' , 1 coo0Z Z Ut a) V (1) ca 0) \ / vi oi= � (13 lL (n (n0- N��VI C. o� a��� RS in n� °co 71' — a a) ¢a a NNV O •� n �F0,-W (ON COE OV LLOOO 0)SOH N w 0 C D _ > `a U Q < 3 (`.N- O O O�� C O O +Y 2 US Co aUD ,-40')U) ` M L > U) 10 J ° N N co t ~F N N —A M c N C6 Z e co 0 X o0- T 0� Cr N CONO Cr -7-� (n j...N O N (`0')n r-L� N(�O (r0 (O I� �,I•- C .5 5(07 0 LO ID i_ •V-1 U r•--CO j C4i C) 0 000 m - U) (00 �� X J el:Nr Em0) � Q CO _,._; —h. I_°'- -j — Co / win 491 41 �1 34olii sPad l 51.6 0 9I- co. � �° ' 0l 6 0 5 C9 • iP L 906 0 llS L5: ,' I L II SI9462 25519P91. 9L ® #1•74 9482 9L4l leloi ul ins . Osseooy eonewv 40)lue8 E a 0 TD a) a a) a) L D (n a) .0 xc t .. 0) co CO C w a as 0 a) in CZ w VI I a) a' c0 AA > W r."-- c--- m CO d'1.-O CA P P O'c- M ct N V CD P O) iOD CO Cn CO L V 0NN O LU 00 OD P C) CO I- c-c-N CO CO N N N N C) 0) N N N N O 0 1 (0 C - .P'O O)C) 00 V O P OD O 0) CO W0)� - P N r-..-•-CD COM N M N CD CO CO N CO a r a C7) O C \ 4g 0N-0O .-CO 0 OD COCOct COCO V CO0D CO N "'0 N 0Ch ' ' 'n On CO U a C O C) 0 Q ONN 0 V MO C)(A� �MM00 V MNP(DMP U U N 0) ��OM �a-V Cvjn NN)NT-O)6N Y > •N� 'Q-. N M CO CO 06 Q p d 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 a u- H O O O _C .0 -."' co = VCO N CO O) P P 00 CD O OD r O V O M CD m 0) — ,-— V P ,.N CD C V•C O co M M M M M O (0 J 00 u-)CO .-In CT 1 r E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O D 0 T° COP 0000) M N CO CO aO 00 CD P CO P r M aMM V 0)) Cn to to P N T- CO C)0 CD M CD r r03 y..'' O Q C N 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O N CO 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 U (.0CO a 0 In 0 N..€ L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cu NO CD 0 CDO E -0 ro o .'cnLL Z• 0 0 EO ` Cn (DCO PCOQ 00 T'P O N M O C0 COP P.-CO co u_ F N MNN OTZ CPO V V V)C1 O)O oq C(�I�OOP N�9 P P O (0 LI- C) U) CL = 0 ;OCON-CD PCON co r CD OCD QD C— O = J '- '- C')CI a- NT-NCO 00N MCI- N p ni a) LLO O U '*� C E in V P MMO�PCAMO N.-DAMN al 'Z) z ~ M N,„co O Up co O O O 0 Oo 0N 0 0 0 0 0 O Vr CC5CSI U X CI- £• 1 •1 (3) c) v) 0000000 c-000 00 0000000 Q1}� a 0 o N o 0_tQ N � CO co oc N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FEN 3@ 0 0 0 W CC > 22 0000000 0000000 0000000 _CD LL F O O O = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) O O O J O O 9 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it O O O D 0.-0) O O O N CO M CO CO O CO yr Cn H V-0.,0a I ' CD N--CM CO ' N.r� - 004 CO 0)) C T- 0 O N O N N a) a _ — E Q YY l CO co p CD V- O M CO O d m N N 0 0 7 O O a 2 NCD c-c- 00 O a) @ O O i s 0 LS , a 0� > a) 'D O J 2``) 20 0 +� coco @L 6.MhCAONCOmO a�OONMCnMOD 0- '• POOPv @ (y O0 1= �� N r Lr) N r.-�CnO� �0 e--N�P000 0 t. 30 U) s- TO ,- Q m O c ,-- c N no_ - N O L g Dto O)N M C N�m 2 NM ON CD CV CO` 2 NN Om OO MO X —LL o r 701 CY)•-•-� V OD cu. am r'T00 a CO rO.c C C CO 0 CO > = Q m 0 0 0 0 0 000 9.0 0 0 0 0 0 000 N V 0 0 0 0 0 000 'CT/ J 0 0 O a-- y O 0 y O LUN O.i g E O) E m - o ` ` `O C `O E. r E Cu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL o O a-T-N V 0 LL c-O O O c-N CD Cn 00 N O y N O N W D LL Cn N j,'E-. j,C 0 z N-''w2222 a)To u- co 62222 0 la u- cw2222 a 76 LL I"r'13= 5 Eco<<<< §Fa <°<<<n Eoa <°aa .o Eoa ®tin.q C 220000„0Q YY`-.-c-N CO YY 0000 COQ /�, I y`�� W baa ~ . O O as ~- AM N- \-- N 0)7N 1,70 N 1.0.-7 N N�00M N.-1-U) 1-NM In.- .-CO N 0 0MC) I,- 15 1O N - - N N(0 V)M u)0 p 0) F CD C M r 007 rN CO 1,- O.-00.- .-0.-ON O N.-71- CO u)Lf)VI 70)7 M0 o .-.-7 .-.-MLO N N F Q a Q N 0) 00000 OOOOO 00000 O O O O O 0,0000 O O N.-M 0.--00.- ...--' .-0O 7 >, a c N 0 � N - 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0 N 4) ,0) co> L 0 7 N.-00M 0.- .-M O.-O O.- 00.-0.- O N.-7 N- 0D7 m NM CO(000 CO '-.^^-, 0 '-M .-.-CO Ino vJ n LL 1- -,"' v .-000.- .-ON 7 00000 .-000'- 00000 0'7 0L .-N'Cr M 0 O d N J 1 C 00000 00000 00000 OOOOO 00000 OOOOO 00000 1 a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N 0 0 0.-.- a) N H r 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 00000 00000 0 O N O N 000.- U• (0 .— a • wt 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 crs o a Z Z 0 EO ` 0 0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 i-+ p(0LI... U) Cl) I... N = 00000 00000 ,00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 Co ,_ v d' 7 O CU CL) is,U CD 4-1' + ` 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 \V N Z ~ ca D UQL U m u)MN 7 7 000,-,- N 000 N 0.-0'-N CO..-.-N .-NN If)0OOM u))v N X 0 CU d a) F — 0 a` C WE a) 0 N U) 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 `� v C1 J a �% 8 a QL co O N L 00000 00000 0000. 00000 00000 N.- .-Il) I... d m 0) .L.. 0 7 U)CI N 77 000.-.- N 000 N 0.-O.-N 00.-.-N .-.-N u)Cr) <I'0)N"7 0) x 00000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -J ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F D O O N ,-CO 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0.--O 0.- .-0.-0 N N, CO N CO 0 7 CD N N Fo N Ca) a E 0 2 N 0 0 0 0 0 000,00 OOOOO 00000 00000 0 0 N-M 0 0 0 S- N N N a 0 C L O00-- --00N 00000 0.-00.- -000 .-N. - -. .-7 0.-(0.4.a cc r3 o rn 0 Cn m Z rt -o _c >s p 200000 00000 0000° 00000 00000 00000 00000 X o a'u_ F : ti To> c ,.x = .-OOO.- ON 00 N 00000 00000 00.-0,- ,-000' 0M0 N-0 =p W W -0 J 0 CZ O C O O O O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD Ct N ? N W f�` CD Z 0 2 2 2 2 m 2 2 2 2 m 2 2 2 2 m 2 2 2 2 m 2 2 2 2 m 2 2 2 2 m 2 2 2 2 m _aaaao QQQQ0 aaaao aaaao aaaao aaaao aaaao �= o(n o(n f- Oin o in Ou)Ou)H Ou)Ou H o o o.r)I- 0 10 0 LO I- oino In H �O�M7 ODM V ODM V O.-M.4- i6 ODM7 0000 o.-(h7 (� tNNNN (V(V N(,1 (7 C7 c•lM 47 V V u)u)u)u) <0Ou)c0 41rz O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E > -0 N- 0)0 CO M O co 00)Mo COMN-oCO M 0)1- 0 u)N 7 N ON IN nCO 0)M in h 7 -M M U) 7 2 V. 2 7 CO N..- 2 N CO CD V)N..- CO CO N M U)C- CD 7 M(O O N M N N ����l7.") ����2 ����CD .-.-��2 �N N N U) N N N N O N N N N 0) ; CO c - (N7COCOM 0NNCO(N M2O‘-0) OMOCOIO7N-N N RU) c'9) N-NU)NN .-NMU)t•:)-- EY V LN F- N .- CO .-s-CO CO .-s-s-V ,-s-s-.-(n .- .-.-[} a rj Q Cr) O C CD .-00-N 00000 00 0.-.- s-s-Ns-(n 00000 .-000'- 0.-0 0� />, 0 C O 0 d N L• o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CI3N N co co W L0 N co h co O O r 0 0 7N-COO) CO 7 CO 2U) O)N M C- r to oo 0)0) 0)N 2 u 7 N y-0 O L u)u7 CD COA h 0)n n c7 h CO 0)0)C 1�C CO COM 2.-s-N'7 s-s-004 0)-0)0)0v. U) r-Li. M V ."' = 0)2(0.4-g h N N s-v7 M N N.-c.4 0 2 0 0 Cn(O CO 7 V U)N O N CO N s-C--N N7 N- J C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.- -0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 -0 0s-N 0.-0.-N I I- O CD 0 O MONCO .-N N.-CD 0.-s-ON s-s-OON 000.-.- s-N0,-a O N O N V U) F N-- a O < c N 0 O 'CD OMON IO s-NNs-CO 0--ON s-'-00N 000,-.- .-N0.-7 0NO N 7 U cfl N a Y t 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 E 'D -rd O in rY co z U 0 Z 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 VN 0 cu C H -+—, C 3co Y U_ Cl)U) U) � 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 C— O� o -J in'Cr 2 OCUmL U'"' 2LO + ` 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 z NCO CO D 03 UQa U - N n h 0)CC) CO CO CO 0) CO 0)NIS OCOO CO COCO In COl CO CO CO 0)U) CO CO N "CI .O 15 m 77(n(n N to Li,770) r'v 77(O V'CD COIN In I�222 0)m m�C 0)N- mM 0 CU0 X 00- N a a. -0.— c a C j N 0 CDC/) 00.-0.- 00000 .-0.-ON -000s- 0,-.-ON O N O O N 00000 T X J D ) Q0-(0 o N O N 7 NN Cc.,,,, N M u7) (n 7 CD 0) CO CN.- N CD M COCO0 h (000) N N O N N uC2 ) N o0M M N ai co y LL7 Nu7 w Q 'C 0 i O M O h 01 0h 0) co,--‘-NN- 700NC 00010)07 u)O 02 CD COMM U) 5 LL L 7 7 7 7 h C n 7 7 7 h 7 7 CO N M u 7 u 7 7 I- 7 I n CO N A U)U)U)O A U)U)U)N N - - - r r .v" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N J E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -,- 0 -0 0- 0--0 N 0 s-N N,f) ,-.-0 0 2 0 0 x-0 H D m u)M(n7 1-h 770�)N 2M N. cc"'.-U)r-u'7-CO N 7 N-�NI-N- MNNONN-I- NU)�M U)ONCOCO N OF C r a) a E O. 0 CC) N---In 0---M 0,-N 0 M --M OIC) O N N 0 7 O N O O N 0 0 0.-r- a, 0 a) C a a �- N o L_n 7 7 h CO M7 ( 0)C0' )- N- 7 0.- CD .-u)CO ,V)CO COCO000 C00 0) h CO OCOO) N N Na' Cs- ,-7 7 CO s-CO amu) ..-s-.-N2 N.-.-.-N- D _ 3 0 � (3)Z CC v > 0000000 00000 00000 000o0 00000 00000 00000 a) N.- > ~ C ,.)( .� CO CO(0N-N I-okr)'co IACD O)O) a)co 0)NN Cl)m co co O)CO7 N-,n '-N W CON -0 W J W -0 N CO NO C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a) LL H W r�r CD Z O<<<<o 2222 m 2222:N 2222 0 2222-b. 2222To rL 2 2 2 3- 2 a a 0 a 0 0¢O¢F0 0 a a¢ 0 0¢O a 0 a¢O a 0 a a a a 0 a a a a 0 ,�@ / o u7o u7 F- ou)ou7 F- o(no u7r 0(00(0 H o Ino Inr o(no in O C') H jz O r-co.4- r:-: O M.4- 66 O M 7 O.-co 7 O M 7 O co.51- ,,.; O M 7 (� I I f l CO CO Co CO O)O)O)m O O O O N N N N 1161 0 10000 0000 0000 0000 > w API N- 140 N- 00 Cr),- V V COV 0 a') 0 0to V CO N-N0) N-.-CO Oe-0) e-0) CO N-V O LO 1n CO CO I F NNNMC) (NO M N-N-O C)MN-M N 0N-CMDMCO NC)4 D(D VNM=tn N‘- C V. CO c m O=CON`4.' N-NOtN CON- DC)N-0 V(M WC)Z•7, OC) O CDO0 O-N-00lCO(OlN-(DN V cc;,':iM DCD Ct Fo -�� ,-�� �''NNaO NNNr-a0 �� V N .-- \ a N a a) C ___• co N 0.-O co co 0 0 0 co e-e-0-co e-e-0 ON C)O N-V CO 001N0.0 NA-0 O CO "' 7 > d C CU 0 (Z .77. 00000 000040 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0 N N 0) Y > � � m 06 s E _ a- 0 V V C)0 (0(0 0 C N- C D NCOV C O C O N N C O V V Q 7 M O N V o Lo N-N VCO CO O - 0)01 a)N--M 0C)V 0) N-N-0)CT)al 0)0)N(D conC),-ON-V .4,-,4-V 0) MMM c.)0.) }' = CO CON-N N- ..-N-V V CO N-V CO N-CO V 4)N-N CO CO 0 CO O CO O LO C) I,-e-(ON-V QN v e- N-N-V A-N N V e- C)N.--C)0 N- r4-) N N- J e- e- 1 E -.-00N 000e-A- 00000 00000 00000 0N-00A- 00000 1- 4) 0.-N N IO Ne-N-O et 0 MC)0CD 0..01-A-03 O.-'-O N 0NN Oef Nom.--ON H r Q a C N 00 r-N N tO N A-N-O V C C)COO CO 0 CO,-N-CO O e-e-O N O N N O V N V O N- U c0 CY, a „L, L 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 cB O co Z 0 0 Z 0 ` 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (.) N CD co CD LL' H C/) = " CO +-7U- CO CO Cl_ u) = O0000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 C— O C.) oc - `L O z E 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 iVl T z + F F CO D Q 0 ) C) 0)N- (00070 ZS(nN-C)(0 001 ON N V O OON NO (O AO V N- r X� O O m�CO� OOOQ co ON-V 004 NN- ON COC)CD et 0) (n CD CD CDN CV U V 0 � 0 Qe �.� C '5 a C ki— O 0 7 0 0 e- 0 0 e-N CO O N N N- 0 0 0 e-N- N N 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X J j a) 2 a \ L O N N @ N(O(O0C 0(00-1- COC N N- NN N-N O et Oa h N N- COIN N-CO CO (-CO(O N IN V 41 It)(O tO) e-e-� e-� ca w a' 'L 0 7 V COON Cnet ONCO CON-NM COV 0CN- 041(000COCD N-CON NON-d)0 CL L 01N-N-N-N 0)000)N-et C000(0 0n 000(0N-N N-CO(0(0N CDC V VCO Cn(D Cn V N F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a)J E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO CO N 0 CO.-CO N e' N CD N 0.-e-V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F n - 0O CN N-D 48 O CO(N NV O 0C))40 CO V O (O W 42'4? N CNNN-C W N NNr--Q1 CeO-N-7.-N-r-(AN- C E a la 0 U N-O -O N N-O e-V CO"I-.-NN- N O O V CO 0-O 0 O O O e--C)A- O O s-0 e- a) a a) > -.--, m 0 OO.c V Q -N-N 0)N-0)C V CDON C1 N-N-00 V 0)CD N-COCO 0 C CO COO (0(nN CD N- CD C) N Ne-e- A-N-.-e-t, NNN COQ) CO NC).- .--,--,-.-c001,-,-.-1.-.01,-,-.-1.-. e- e-V CN. (/) L- 0 • D a)Z a a0 7 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X_ 0 0 LL � M CO (a 0 ,.X J V NCO Cn N COV COV N 0(O CO r-.7 N-.-(O N N N CD LO(n CO CO CD CO e-0 CO N N N 0) W W- 0 CO 0 E O O O 00 O.-00 e- 00000 00 000 00000 O 00 00 000 00 N L.L HLU lift sem Z m N m t0 m 7.L N l0 Z � (O H aaaaaaa o a0 aaaao aaaao aaaao aaaao 13,� O aaaao OCD o(n o in 1- o co O to n r- o in o( o in o in H o in o u,I- oto o In r �07CM V Oe-CO V 0s-CO V 40e-C)V Oe-M V 0•-C)V 0.--C)V O CB N N N N CO ih CO co V V V V Cn(n(n Co (O(D(O(D N-r n id CO N- Cu CO C -t0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 f0 ca ID v.> w A(a. N i'-'. N 7 N L 0 M a)L N t` C')--L OL 0 O N in co. 1 ON-LU V N- MNNN O ��� V p rm C')� N r V N 1 N N (D c -o - (- M(O N-O 0 aD 0 N O V L N M 1-In 7 LU LL f N(N 0))- LU V InN- M�Co 0 0 (O0 e Q 0) a) c Cl) 000'T- 00N O N 00c-0c- In 0- (+) 0 ++ 't OON M Nf0 >, co a c 0 N N t CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 > CD a) o_) Y in� � m oo .c E 0 -I- O O 2 N N l A O n (ID N N(O ION V M V h r I M c0 N l^ N LL = pMj co 96 CD' 000)n V/ - In In 4-' = M L N N co 7 NT-N L 0 0 0'-T- (0 1-0)0 0)C0.- CD J N. I A r I 4 ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O T-T-0)O—O I H. '_0 0 0) a) 0 0 0 T-T- O O N 0 N O O N O N CO 0 0)c-0)0) U) 0 O�N�N a O a c N Cl) 000T-c- OON O N 00N O N 00 IA 0)c-0)C) O CO OC V C N U (0 a L L 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O a) a) c6 CO O a Z 0 Z 0 ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 a) co 0 " H 0 U_ Cl) CJ) LL 0 0000 0000 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 U J U) 2 O C o (" I— LO UL D +` 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T�y y F @ UCl U O10clolNa c0 0177 00� 0 VN(O v IANCO 0 C F V LID 00 0 0 LU V X >O a) a v Mvm n C a �•�. 0 '5 a E4. ca 0 X J u) �N o 0 N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N 10 0 0 0 O O 7 CD 7 Tr Q4.1 ' ao = a 1 M QN L T-c-NN(O CV y- LU Nc-092OT-N a) (d m Up I A I A 0 0 W it ,_01 Q LLL ILA M N N V L N l A 0 Nv 4')l A N N V coN I A O N-co V F0 7 c-c- C)LU M M O) .= 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O a) J ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c-0' N I-M 7 CO 7 e- F- M O O M CD 7, (7 m L M M L O LM M V L M V LO N 0 ()0(0N-Cr OA C a � F E Q Q 2 Cl) •-0 O c-N 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O N I A V 0 0 0 a) C) V ONS(D MCO N m 0 i/L L -NMI_M (ON CV T- MM V 00 0)IA(O M CION N Q) o rn M CD��mco�� Cr) Z LU _c T EO 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 0 O 0 X O4-, a)LLH ti > ca c c V.-OON N•-'-MIS 0c--.-ON ON N 0 c0((JN J 0 0 M 0 LU -0 N rn N ( — O E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '—O c-0 0 0 Ct F- 0 o W �rr� a) N2 2 2 2 m 2 2 2�m ����m „00 0 + + YY 5 Eaaaao ddddp 0-000 oL@ ` y 3 OIAO IAF 0IAO0 0IA0IA F'- F— ` N a) _0.-( 0 •-017 9.7. - noUUF-F- a) 10000 0000 2 - o 0 g)� > 1.1.E r` r` ccs -o Ct � ' > >, c a) o U co _Ne > o 0 06 0 CO O r- 4 i 70th Street 0) ?>v Out In Total h. 6263 4409 10672 U) • 79 55 134 -+-' O 6342 4464 10806 �� N C •` I I O 586 3777 0 31 15 U 0410‘ JT 1 43 0 1 10 58 0 rn 25 ®gyp 4) Q) a) Rightt Thru� Le� UT� Peds O Z O 0) / V a) a) coo) � C ' i o ci a D co C p [— N(`070 co a V�tOD 0 co N 110 moccoo10 a Qd d rnrnoo— ccN N �O E0�_ 0tO 000 FU}' z �� F ! G CC UD < Y N �un)M 7)�a— �E NN 4-Y —2000 —�_00C N CM �— X $ � z to� 0 '+ — 000 to co pF o00 .V.. C .5 jNTM F—� r3 000? N M 1 •C 4.`� X J p� � 00.- `000 p Q co �; —0 0.0--, I- — Q N i Q LL co / \ale 111 t a1 r41 14g Wad 01. 942 2£65 0 54 /4 1. 8 4L 0 I.Z S . 'Cocv 6 8£L E989 0 4Z LZ9Ll 8E LIAR . £91. 401. L� pow 49£ll 4E99 ® ��O Ieloi ill lns E. laaJtS 410E E 0 0 > a) 12 a) a) a) N L D 61. a) x O I-- co C �X W f, W as � o La) L W rr�� 0) zZ 12 > G x41 :::: Q) 76> W All`s N- m M Co CD CD O N O NN r CO N Ost Co M I o co V CO V Co O Co V M Co O '7 r O)CO r N r N. F ,-a-T-a-C D 0) N N N N O O M M M M C n C D I a- C -o m 0700 N N N r Co r Co N N O 01 at Co M V Co (y C)OOpoD Co Co co NN-(NO M NN M L.1.. M CO Co O) N N N N Q) O) O) a) C_ Co OOO—MO OOO�NO 0— MMC "' a O N O N O r C) >, a c Ca • N = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N CD 01 co O O U a 06 L MMoocO()Co N-C CDCD,ra)6) Co c000 Coa OP.LL CO r 0)N-f`")r W �00� Co O)Cr)6)O)Coo lf)Co (// Co T- coC co -C 4-, = at P.N N07 V CO N O N OO 0701 TrON J % T-T-V N v- -c-CoT-Co Nat M N C')�C) I E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,-O O T-("Nal'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I F O O Co O y--, 7 a) Na-N NN- 0 a-N Oa-V O MOO CD 6) Co H coxin Cr') C CDQ N a-NNr 00 U N O�V OCD O C')00 CD 6)OOr U , co a —Co .-Cn t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C)0 C)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rn 0 0 0 f0 Q 0 .- O O O CC ,+ Z 0 Z 22 0000000 0000000 0000000 VN NLL o oo (A L _ (D - �� a. (/) CO d 0000000 0000000 0000000 C 0,_ (1) O o o O O CU m O� E 0000000 0000000 0000000 UCUC)Z F o 0 0 Q 7 op -Y m O co N Co O O Co Co Co CO Co M M 0 6)O) Co O O f CoCoCoV N 6)610)a-V CO ' O,-O et O? M X O - 0 3 (,)-,. c •g 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O N Co O N N O O at CD 0 � X J d p o N oIn .0-441".CC a L co 1000m E co 01 7MCn UD CocnN NNCn tD SCO CO3)f) NrNNO�O�O�D W D _ ,_0 •" rn 0 L r 0h Cn,-U) Cf)O O CoCr Co CO M Coat Mr-V 522 V Co'r't 010 N CO CO CO CD,r Co Co Co Co W V eor p.LL F Co�o 'co co r 6) N C)0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 J O O O E 0000000 a-,00 N U)O C')a-NT-r COM F p O COA C() 7 Z Cr Cl O) V Co Co Cl Co U) Co V CO Co C) Cl Si ,-Na-c0 at Na-NN O) atM V 7MCo CO O O CD a YY CO co a a ID 4- 'ON-T-MrCD Ai,2 ON OO N a-0 g.:E NN CD a-U!) N N 0 Mv) as NN as MCO U o a Y 2 oo 2 con a 9 a a _ _ O �L L aQ tr MMO(O0 CC)�r T-a- CDC CD u,0 CV NMMN rCO(0) a) 3 3° �Mv ——vCb ��� Z•c ,r CV ,_Nr D a)Z ¢o o U) - U) a � o � ��oo000000 °�oo000000 � �0000000o x_ �--, NLLLo (n O m 0 m 0 O a F" D g • Q • a c CU CD C00 D > Stam r r O U)6)co(f) O U 0)Co V r U)co V 0..VOD-r,-N- -p 0.S ) o co Nujn o w N(6� N a ' .-01,„,a1' W -O O:- M N N 0 (n N tll U CO NN pC O C N O E n/ E D 0 0 0 0 C)0 00 LL 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 L L 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 l.L H C 0 ON ,- O rn 2 O LU = L- ., N TC • TC- y� W W Z N-'w222M a'ma c 2222 a ou- c 2M22 w mLL ~�� > EE oaa<Q s oa Q°aaaa 15,4: Q°aaan. 15,4: a..� 7 '5et O�C`MOF OOO� .Vo to DF OOMVO' 6F O -t= ONODOX)00_ a. SSNNNN a ==0000„0 a Ie ����c�\- _ p000 Y6 Q YY��r < YY Q /}��,} J CO.41... w @m o Fo N a) �Fo aa, a) F' 11 W baa as as N- e-- 7600000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 N- F CO c - X00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 fr 12 Fi Q) C c ,D o O o 0 0 o O O o o O O o O co o o o o o O o 0 0 0 0 o O o o O o 0 0 o w 3 > d C C O o Nr0oo00 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0 a) 0) Y > E 0 06 E a p L o 0 0 o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 (n C LL 1- a) 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q J CD :I-' E O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO F- D N m 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o H (1) Cl.) N- U) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CI- a)c N m 0 O E°� L00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 U -.-.6e— 'o O1 a)w O O > � ` 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 wV E O CZ LI) C .0 co 00Z > .-- Z 0 a) Y 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. O U) (B (c J O RS � LO LLU) U) 0 ~ U 4.0Z ` 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 C z + F- (13 > N iii m aY U U Q L , 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 a co X o EL o coa) n 0 V � (0_ C -0•� _C CL C 4.. Xo co 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0.- c0 .-.% O d aMS N� O N� QL 01 N r0o000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 III U co U W D Q E y o L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0o LL F=- 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -J C O O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 H C a) Q E Q O 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0 Q) > a a) C0 0 o a) r L 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 U) U o O7 D 0 a)Z w Q > o N >,0200000 00000 oo0o0 00000 00000 00000 o 0 o 0 0 X LL L Ta I-U] > C 06 .= 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 o O O o o O o O O o 0 0 o O O O O o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 -p J W (0 0 O C00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 W > _aaaao aaaao QQQQ0 QQQQ0 aaaao QQQQ0 QQQQ0 ;� O X00 H oho O F- oinc unH 0.7 oinH oOON F- oho OF- ou-01nF- >> p'0.-M V Or.<h V O'—(h V O'-(�7 V o�M V o,-ch V O.—cn V (� NC) cV NNN C7 c�'iMM Kit V V CC)U U)U) c0(0 CD co _ a) � 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 (13 -O N--- ,-- (o O.-OHO) 0NN1-I.- N0 V..CO CD CO 0) n00 CO C01- CO0I,-NN CDO)00000 1 0)0 N CO N 0 M N V V V 10 M'7 V•ctC RMM V'CO CO 10.4C 0) CD IO tO CD M V 10 VCO F N e•-;-j 1 CO C -�0 a 0ON—CD 0.-0.-N 00,-04- .-000.- 0.-.-00 00000 000 1.1 F \ a C) \ a a C CO N 0 NJ t--N 0t-0.-N 00t-0t- 4-000t- 0'-r-0 N 00000 000.-- "' 0) >, d C a) o (6 7, z 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0 a) 2) m 06 E 0- 0200000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 CO co (I) H (.1) 000000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 U Q J Q) E 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) H N- 1 m �t-0010 CD t- �.100 CD 0) 1-N-CO.--O Ino n In n 1-N to CD 10 CO 14.-7 0)M W CO 0) .-4- 0 to .- .-In 4--.-00 N- - .-N. t-a0 t-N N N 0) MNN N,- NNt-01 03 4--0 I- G..) Q) 4) a 1'4- U] CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TJ CD a C N @ o• ti o QEt= z 0 0 0 O Co .-0 N 7 N.-1 n 0 M N O O N C 0 0 N U (0 N 2 °) > E 2 -00)In In 0 V n 10 a0 a0h O V V 0)1n a?N n CD C a7 N 1-7 n 0) C 00 NN L NID CD N N N- (O .--NNNO) MN N NO N 0 ('40) V E• � � o o U) c .0 (B 00Z > OCD Z 0 t a) Y00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 (n V - (B ` J OCtS a WU) U) dit ` 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 U mina C z + H C>) C UCI Q i 03 s_.t-dr O.-NOM N N V V N v tOe1nO CDCDCD NMO LON ON�O� M a) V 3 In c a 7:5.1.= 0 .5 .0 7 CA ,—0,—.--CO 00,—0.- ,—0—'—M 0 CO M.-h 00 N.-CO 00000 ON 00 N 2 1 N QN N z 00.-0.- 00000 .-N N CO Cl) NN t-M 00 V.-0 CO CO N MO N 10 CO 0'V 0 0 0 c 0 2 W Q E 0) 2 ` 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 WH 00000 0--o(V o0.-0.- N 0 0t-CO .-0 N t- 0 0 N M 111 N O O N V a) J E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F- CD V'� In a)('CO M 0) a7 tD N .--h 0)00 In N-ID I-1n N O M 000) O 0).f V a .-N�N f� .-NN M O) .--N r-�I� N��N1� .-N NCO 00000 N MN NO ' I- a) a 0 00000 00-0- 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0 a) > a 0 U) o o 0 Etrz00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0) CO 0 0)Z rt Q > CD >`E 2 v(V'N N 'N N N N Q 7 41 N l n 2D N M N N N N-N N- N O N N 0) 0 N N N 0 cXX CL)LL L r .-- �� r r r .- 4-4 C) H (6 U) > C 06 ' 0 0 0 0 0 t-CO e-N 1� 0 N t-t-V —O 7 co co co N.-t-h N t-N O 1 D 0 CO N N N- W CO 0) o E 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 D rn W �� 5 Eaaa<0 aaaao aaaaa aaaao aaaao aaaap aaaCo oinoinI- oInokr)l- 0 -C') l- olnolnl- 0 C') F- 0 C') I- O ou,I- 0.-0!77 O.--M� 0.-M.- o $oo O.-ch V O7 M V O.-c.7 V Q) (6 0R 000 CO id 00 O)Oi Eli 000) 0000 N N N N Ian,' ' 0 000 0000 0 00 0 .-.-'-.- ,-,-,-,- ,-,-.-.- 00 0 0 CO A[• 1 W ti �p CD CO 00) UD CV o M CO O U)0)0)M 470)(O n V V OIn 0)1-to CV N 7 N N 1 H (0(O U)N N U)U)U)U)N N-1`OOcf 00)(O n M U)COM V co U)M M N U) M<-N N 0) .- ,- N- I (0 c N6 , O O.-O O-O N 0 0-O.- 0 0 0 V-, 0 0 0 M M 0 0<-0<- O O O O O Q H Q Cll C CO O O.-O- O-O n-N 0 O.-0- O O 0 T- 0 0 0 M M O O<-O O O O O O 7 >, d N N o CO yL 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 0 > a) o) 0 CD Oa E C- p0o0oo0 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 U) 00 L GO F- 0 Q) 0 .x"' 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 (..) a) Q -J Q) .^' C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O (J F- 1 N- I m n N NM O a NNN N r(a N(O- V V O 4;; U)N�N N-� D 1')O�N�I-N -"°c' °'El I- r ' r .-- a)Q) n a Q (/) 1,-- O O o 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O V R O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 r 17 4— O a) • N CO O \ +_••, L .-%O O N O O.-O.- T-N V-M 1� T-N-O O N O<-O O<- 0 0 0 0 0 OT-O O 4- U (OM 30 > E N 0 ` C0 MNN NOO V NNU)O o V U)M V V 0MU0) NM N M(0 MON N. '-U)O U) `E0 = (.n � .c ca 0 0 Z > o� Z 0 U at 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 N C H2 O CD J min LL (A (A a 0}. 0 ` 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 00000 ZF ki D UQ < m in r- N- (ON V U)a0 �hf�7N CD �4)a�7 CO V NSM MOOOM CO 5 en -0._ m•5 a `� N ,-N N O U) N O O N? M N-T-.-(0 %T-O O N M M M 0 O) OT-0 0T- T-0 0 0 V- 4. X J a ami Q� co CO Op •j 2 d QL' CO In N = MR N 00) M N(N - o V(0 N CO N N N N M 0 M (0N N.-.- N 000N U CO 0) r r U W cE Q E CD 2 2 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 = V-T-O V-CO V-O N O M N N O V-U) NV-V-O V O V-OV-N OV-O O V- O O O O O CI) -J C` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O H o M N)(ON� N MN N V NN0)M N N 2 N M M N N W 0CO N4Nr.-63a0W'r NN-n c 1r r r a) E Q CL O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N a) a) CO Cl 0 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CJ CJ O CJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0UD L U 0 •- D 1 Q >. 2 NNo V V 7 M 0) 0) 0)h(O N M O N V V COCOR W O N-0) 00N V NCO X MN NO NNNNN NNNC') V MNMM NN.-SOD NNN�00 U) m of at NNN h .-NN 047 s- O N.7 s-O<-<-M <-<-O<-M O<-N OM O.-O O.- -� J w -0 a) CO o E O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O N O O O O O O O o 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O a) N j CO I.L CO IN Me \ a-aaaaaa0aaaaoaaaa0aaaa0aaaa0aaaao Oa'� - a0 E0U0U)H 010001- OIno U)H 0U)0U7 F o U)o U)H 0L0001- 0U)0 U)F �Ov oC') 0 V-C0 .- C') O M <- v o<-( v o a CO 0 C') > co N N(V N (7 6)66 66 V 4 V.- 4)In 4)4) (O(0(0(0 6.:6.:n N- 00 CO CO CO c t"'O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 > W ci .6' ti rO N NnN 0 )-O n LI) 00000 N N CO 0 h r m O^M N I N N fA (0 C 0 om/ nm O O O O 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 f . CO N IX H N O 7 N O Qn a) m 000000 00000 00000 NoN-a-M O N O V CO) to >. CL Q) 0 (� 1-„, 00000 00000 00000 0000000 U > cum m 06 E a 0000000 00000 00000 0000000 LL t (0 E- a) cp U = 00000 00000 00000 0000000 Q N J U) !nn C 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 0000000 vJ D NI- 76 W, m u)C`V LOQ CO N u)CO C) 0 0 0 0 0 U) U)U)N 0 W N CD O Q CO N- m OOOOO 00000 00000 V M . V'OOO [- 0 66 O CD ) E N Qcr_ L 0a-00a- 000oC 00000 )-CO CO h 000 U (.O 3 O 0) MN�MO WWW O CD �p ` LOCDcfL)N C7NL)MM 00000 W CA7�N OCD V O 0itH CO ,_0TI.CO O CO CO O o Z > vJ -I—, C— O CO z U r (ll Y 00000 00000 00000 0000000 O Lo LL CO CO Cl_ U"W0 C00000 00000 00000 0000000 NZ H co D °C:1 .:( Q L U O O N 0 O N O O O O O CO 1�0 L-CO CONI- X OOM 11° N rs M M M N N U 0. -•«s '5 d 4� OM00000 00000 00000 )-NCD CD 7•-CD /� X J CO0 -0 v C,.• a-M M CD Q `O IL N L N t 00000 0,--a-ON 00000 N-CD v CD e-'-0 U W w Q 2 N O 7 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 0000000 W C1 H = a-a-O O N 00000 00000 CA N M CO V'—CD J M O M 0 N ` O O O O O 06006 00060 6606666 F D V N C)N ID N V 7 V N 0 0 0 0 0 M C)CD CD C-N _ F M WMOs C CU a.Q E O N00000 00000 00000 CC)VN70'-0 Cl) N O O co CV CI) o a a) m N0 C 00000 00000 00000 0000000 4) 0 a) CO ZCr is TE 0 O D 7N C)C-CD CD M M7 Cb 00000 0 C CO LC)OD 111 CV c_X U) > CO ,.X O O O O O O.--X.-O N O O O O 0 CO CO M U)L)a-LI) W J O. CV (A L.1.1 -0 0.)N Ca O C 0 0 0 0 0 00000 00000 C') . e-N O 0 0 Cl) F- 66 O N w ~`.� \O Z 02221.6 2222W) 2222-6 Cho o + + YY / C C1-0..13-12- 0 a a a a D 11.(10-12- 0 o — m000 ;�` / C07.ma� o m.- o7.o7� F` o m m 2 2 >, (6- Q) , i....07.ma V 0o0o Om C%7 -D Q O UU f-F (B of of of of OCI 0 0 0 0 n H (0000 mQ o 0 co 1:3 0 Aca'I N- N– (0 r �_ 0) >5 N a) 0 CO U > U CO 06 Q CO Cf) a) 0 0 Q a) ' Site Access Out In Total I 102 170 272 1 33 34 L c ` © 103 203 306 P/*/ I —, 4w, ' 116 0 38 0 16 i� `� O N 1 0 1 0 31 o 117 0 39 0 47 Opp Uht Thru Left UTrn Peds a) O a) O \ / Cl) QD lo O 0 Z W t13 N d — CO N ^ C))co f0 0_ Q 0 0_ N O 7_ U� L1 VJ LL �� 0 CO ON N- NON`� 0LO 7 LLNO NNN . Z `J,'CC 0 �� ~Cn C < neo CC UQ -� Y N C��^„ O O a, + o NN �.1C ,—L2N ON —CCI VI C 4' COLn O `m J Z° N-N- cot ', 0 X / O a, U)ino co co 0� a V 000 •_ >5 5 OCD CNA N CO(C1 O,_ y. •c—–1 O Q4� X _I 000E E000 ( 2 � — v_ — QLLM r / • W lfl 114°1 mi-LL 41. sped ` 0 0 0 0 LZ 4, 0' 0I 0 0 0 OZI #,,,, °�P 0 0 0 L p, LZ LZ 0 �. 0Z 0Z 0 Oo� 0 L L 0 4, 15101 uI lnO c N E 0 0 a) to p to a) (1) cn 0 D 0 Q ami a) x_ U7 m c 06 W -o N CO O °� DC W `umy _� Z > 2 a) cAO-6 _ .— R5 -0 > W ti r' m NNP100) 0 M01"-NN 001•-,-0 7 I 777M(0 0) 10 OO(O C) N C0000)0) 0) F0- < CO N 0) <r CO CO 1 C NN� - -O<O N O O O O O O 0 <0 0 0,- O LL 0 ( 0 N C coID 'O<O N O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <O O O<O O "' />+ ) <O(O O O N C CD 0 00000000 00000000 00000000 U 62 0 0 0 CO 06 E CD 0_ 7 O o 0 0 0 0 0 CCC0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U LL - O O 0 a) U 00000000 00000000 00000000 `<C J O 0 0 CD C0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO It 0 0 0 0 0 r 1 m 700(0 N-0 CO M N-70)M CO N CD CD 0)CO 00 `o ««CO O M NNN,- 0 0 CO 1,-2 4-0h- 0 r OO N O O o. (.n N-- 'NO 000000o o 00000OO 0000000 0 0000000 0 y-. d O O O C N @ o 0,c O«<M COO NOON 700 T-My-c-(0100 U 7 LOMCD N > E ` 7 N-00 N7N N-7 N-000 M 10 CO O NM �'� «e-.-(O 011NN N0 N- 01077 M L) c O LL 75 H N0 a--N ao NCW. C .c ( O 0 Z > �— • Ocp Z 0 d 0000000 0000000 0000000 (n 7 _0 (� O c N� LL U) U) CL UPJ 00000000 00000000 00000000 . RS 2 H 0 0 0 UQm N0M0 0 NMO(00 O N-70710 10 CO X O0 CU d ‘0. CND .- N 0 N (C 0 N a ■m.• c 3 Cpm N 0N o<0.-N 0O 0000000 '-'7 COO X J -0 7O 0 e-o a RV N(n Q tom M co CO t 000 NM00N 0OCO CON N-NN-WN- 0O f0 0 N N <N-CO <(D(0 ImmW ce < E 00 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 (n LL H O O O 0O N OO 00N MOON- O<N<7 COO d) 70 N- <0 -J 0 7 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO N O O N- 10 ,- 00 O M OO 0 7 ,- 0 0 N OO CD H N N C1<0 0O O N NNN0 C) (NM 7M7 W C < 0 Q Y Y 0. 00 O<oo�T-O 020000000 a2O000000 coN a) ,- (v a o a o N cn m aco 20 2M O N ,rL0 0000000 �N0000000 1a070000000o y 0 3Za°), gln 0 ..„ o o D a) ¢ 1 Q > om ,- N a > p 7 ,..1,:›0 M 0 000 0007 0(00 00700 .O 00 N- 000007 X_ C) out L 0o ON NN'ONO )N.-NN0CCI �M0 2 )NC+)aM7Od (� f0 H rn 0 ¢ C • a Cco 2 ° r O P O C 06 4f ¢m '-NOCONO '15N Y-CV OO<0 V ON<O M NO 'p Joo (0110 d (0 p d f'..- W o n ur N�as — E a) E 'a m O C E a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LL-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (`y-0000000 N H to C O N 2 cp O U)_a) O LU 7 r) N >.C �+C _ . 4) Z >,c C L11 C w r�� N out 22 E mLL c 02222 0 @LL c p�222 a)mLL �� E = ga¢¢¢ § o= Qwaaaa §o= ¢,.-aaaa §o= ¢"tp o(no o�'a > nO(n 0U1 75 I-- > 70(00(0 5Ha >, CB f- > j< Mv,o> a 0 0o My > • 0 0Mv,o > • /. '7 VI < c � OOOOm< YYNNNNy0Q22O0O0 YCQAl \ 1 0,o (0 N 0 (0 (0 0 VI} J LU baa 1.-o- as Ho as Ho a m a 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 C m U) C 0 r c U no 3O0 00000 00000000 0 0 o C . .H o 0 0 .-+ .-i .-i N r-I M .-I N m m v ,-+ U) .-I m m N M N MIEIE 3 (6 M J O l0 V ` � M V V V NN O O NM L° I' N ‘(1)° .Qti) co, � CO N N M LT a h l0 CO Ql Q) CO 01 - ri CO c-I W a+ L Lel O 0000000000000 O O 000000 O 000000 00000000000000 J F 3 0 00000 0000000000 O O 00000000 O O 0000 00000 O 0000 0 a ar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-i O - . o 0 0 N .-I N .-1 O N U) OO M N 0) U) N .c c 0.0 .- 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .--i .--i .1 O M N - M 0 .--I . c 1- O L L L 0a L Oa ° m O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (/) J j O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W O O 00 00000000000 00 O O 0000000000000000000 00 O O O O U 0, X \ N o 0 0 0 o O O 00000000000000000000000000000, 0000000 cu U CO L Oa c 3 QO L L L 0a Oa 7 rT, O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ono O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r2 c y .500000000000o O O 0 O O O O O O O O o O o O o O O O O O O O O Q000 ,000 J r- c 0 0000000000000 o000000 ,00000000000000000000 ti ~ f-- n°1. 1 N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000000000 . 00 0 CO a1 Cn Y O (I) C (/) LC 00 '50000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 O U C ~ > U o s C < r m m D 2o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N °n in C N c J .z00000000000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o x 4) 4) c E > o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o W L a) O O - a) CS) £ U) O ") O(fl .U) OM Co O '4' '4 OOCo O V)I M Co O v) OM �Co O '44OCo O nIOCo O Vi) MO CoC O `41 L4-) O O N M M M M M Co Co Co Co In Cr; U) VCo tD tD t0 U) N N h 1� CO OO CO p) O) p) 01 O O O 1p N N N U, J3 m O 0 CD CD CD CD O O O O O O O O O O CD O c1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O O O O O C N 0 M V m ul m a en en a cr O en a N ati N 00 N V l0Trfel ul en en N N N .-I CD O en e-1 ei o M e-1 O c1 O CD 0 0 CD CD CD 0 U I� 00 en O O) en M m O) 01 V O Al OrelmletAJNen 00 O) N N N N O1 en 00 n m t\ O1 l0 N l0 I� e-1 N N N N V O Ol Vl N 111 O e-I O O O O O O O O O N N Ol Ql 00 0) O N .N-I .N-I O .�-I O Ol 1� 01 00 I� 00 V en eO m M N N N O O r-I CD O O O O O CD CD CD O O CD CD O CD CD O O O O O CD CD CD O O O O O O O O O O CD O CD O O O O O CD O CD CD CD O O CD CD O O O O CD O CD CD O CD CD CD CD O CD O O O CD CD CD O O O CD O O CD O CD O CD O O CD O O O O O CD O CD CD CD O O V CD V N Lr, m t0 en e0 N l0 O m e0 N V 00 en en m Le) l0 l0 en 0 0 .-1 Al CD N CD N O o -1 CD O O CD r1 N 0 0 CD 0 CD 0 m N O N O N e--I N .•i O V eH V M O m O m V N e-1 N N ey N el) m m '-I N O O e•-I O .-1 O O .-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD O O O O O O O CD 0 O O CD O O CD CD O O O O O O O O CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD O O 0 0 0 CD O CD O }i O O O O O CD CD CD CD CD CD O O O CD CD O O O O O CD CD O CD CD 0 CD O CD CD CD CD CD O CD O O O CD O O O 0 O O O CD CD 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD O O O CD CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O CD O O O O O O O O O O CD CD O 0 U CO 0 0 0 0 o CD 0 0 rti O CD 0 0 o CD 0 CD CD CD CD 0 O CD 0 0 0 CD 0 CD 0 CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 CD O 0 0 X C •^ 0 0 CD O CD CD O CD CD CD CD CD O O O O 0 CD O CD O O O0 O O O O 0 0 0 O CD CD 0 0 0 O 0 O CD CD O O O O CD CD 0 Q CD 0 CD 0 0 0 CD 0 0 CD CD CD 0 CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD 0 CD CD CD CD CD 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD 0 0 0 0 CD CD CD CD CD 0 0 CD CD 0 0 0 0 o O CD CD 0 0 0 0 CD CD 0 0 CD CD 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 C 0 CD CD 0 0 0 CD CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD 0 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 0 0 0 CD CD CD O 0 0 0 0 O CD 0 0 CD 0 CD 7 C jD 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 O O -I O O O O O O O 00000000000000000 C 4) O 0 T CD o 0 CD CD CD O CD CD 0 CD CD 0 CD 0 CD 0 0 CD CD CD 0 CD CD CD CD O CD CD 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 O CD CD CD 0 0 0 CD 0 CD 0 0 U > U 0 Q 0 oa5D 000000000000 CD O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C o y COD0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000000 0 0000000000000000000000000000000 x C13 N C L'1t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o W 0 VI o en o en O en o en o en O en en en o en o en o en o en o en o en o en o en o en o en CD en O en o en o en CD en o en CO U timao .- mvo .-ImvoM mv, oNmvo .-lmvoelmv, otimvom etiv, oe-Imaotimaotima W O N ati N g N N N Al m m M M V V V V en en en en tD t0 l0 l0 A n n N 00 00 00 00 T Ol 01 O) O N N N C-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N H N N N N N N N N e-1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N At33 0 0 0 0 0) c U) O c O 0 0 0 0 0 U O_ N n c1" 0) ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 0 0 / O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 0 0 0 Co X 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ti i 0c6o 0 0 M 0 a) a og, o o _O 0 U Q 0 0a..? o o O CO N (aC: o o x a) 2 L O IAD O O w a) • o U ) e m a W m m m rri NINNN C ON W N—a-_, m m N A ts X M`-N P M N N A X .M.-R m'M N 'M b ♦+ a aW CO E rc L 3— r— I-- zW pmopo z W z w AC z OI m N A Z i0 V O W V V z M 10 h N N P A 11111 W w ... W L9D CL m N m H m a o O q.0 Vl a O O r m try m p ^10 MI M OD I- n O 11111 •mgm 1 N d ~ N M V 1 O O N M P p P C0 p O 4.11 I-- >-W m W m r m z �/� V7 o fA o W ' Y� \ • W 11111 QK vo COQ oova v o V) oovv vo c Co) �a a 2 ° a m c 111 2 a a § Orx W a :ill V V M N W V N m co co N A 2- m M 10 N O V PM ct0 z r Z r Z t' r O z q Z a z d 2 W 1111 o 0 208.2<!,?..‹! o o Z W �\' o e a W K o o C U 0 0 0 0 2 U o 0 0 0 0 0 I-a z a z aDI a. _— Y W r 1'W r e m r !�(U m 0 RO ,..,9,.....E.,,,,1.,•88, N o w O NI X U \W N W W e m W K :::: Inm 1111 wz `Mr 1111 o m m n a c Y 01 N gg _ J• r1111 cn"m J F- V I2O O m N 4 -I r 2 V—m N m m t0 0 O.- fp m Md O r N O) 6 p G"" w EE E.2 O M O _ w a a b Y O Lm co cc 2 o j A ON. O M ? CE.,' b07mMN10 A m NNW A N d N a N C C d d a — --- c — -- c c ca r r m m hi: : zrzN 7 q m h D LL W W N A 2 y J W W W N nJ OI L O.r .0 0 0 J . L a r .0 0 0 J O c c a O z o 0 o c c a O S o 0 o c c a p d d �j� alm N �j� -000 ul 'm N J7 10.0_0 ti0 N g2c 0 ill 00. F o o��� 0. o a w o��� 0.o a 4ggA _ o o 0 o r `p d r r r `o •• L w >t a # g11 .5 y y C W W NO �CW/W o,-N N O w W O O N N O b �- Of co C 0 N NAOMI m W co 1.Q N r M m M• N b b U U U 2 c c e V C 0 p O Z« O m N 190 Y —o y 0 0 N Etta- at jv � ca - D W N C (/)J 5 .. N b T a0.._ Z,t w co ;, E w E E W E E `�rp o m o 0.U y L K L (O O 9 d V�. G 3 O 3 ubi A ` ` .'pc 2 0 0 0 ','s 3 0 0 3 o a m a OIL3 0 0 o g 8 t 5 t S t `goo = d o N o a d N o = o N o 2 ! 4,2i. m U 00.0 m U 0 C U°c > o c U yo O U c > c U b e c cO 3 71'0113b2 m `°io- 2 mOm cti g2,52 2 2Om c1- m T.i= o YL°C7 C7 O . .G,2-.; c d Y d w c o n c y a Y m c o o c a (5 d.15..a.pp v_ c ._rn y v_ d- 0' :0 c,, y `miry 'Tay n mf�5 m m ' r-N GI N 0. d N>N> Ol�-Cl N N d N 0 sr.IS--Cl N N N a o Lu()32 d oOLu dm OSX m o d' d m d'O>= m N 0 Lu m w 1,,. ..9, a b N „ b w C b b r�f<n:3 Q L L m L C G m L L t O D. as a d ad d d d ad a 2 ., 44vui Appendix E: Volumes S • ack CONSULTING Figure B1 ENG,14IFEP1510 TPAFF1C 14P ,akF3 Existing Peak Hour Volumes • '(is,...rq),,, 7.:1 I I I I 0 1 I I il'.5 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I.'.,, ,:/)0:, . ; ,:v ' 7 8 2 6 • t I • t Google Earth ' .,,r. . -„ 4 A e ,,,. ■ I , AM Peak Hour 1 ;* 2 exp --' i— -\ 4 `/`"w r00 42 J L. 19 72 1.l 34 1 flg0 310 --/. 4- 179 l 50 } 1 9 c6Xe rse eV al 6a f ,, a,. -)1 lc '\ fc a uN"---, \' l ^ H h ti ``v'/ PM Peak Hou 7 J L t .-11c °'?' \ ..)1 .- / ( .- -,i� f "--`�4 I,' l � Y 5 _ E...§ 6 _r., 41:110/"-- ''''''' 491 3.)( /C 16 -,,,I, } w�.`JBB �` It 1 f /' r� ;' f' rr /� l' 1 Estelle Edina Mixed-Use Development El f (1; Spack Consulting Appendix E: Volumes S • ack CONSULTING Figure B2 ENINEERINCTFAmcrC[2W4Fb 2019 No Build Peak Hour Volumes 3a 1 2 6 .— . f • . ' liti. -1.' , F �. t C _. A GoogleEart.h .. ay T ;, AM Peak Hour 1110T ,7 '2 C -)1 C r's-°,l *-- \ �1 c 1 J .7a 93 52 42 2D 1 �7 319 __� -- 154 u r \„..44, .. 133 �^ 6�6 / -dr' ��,r -� i i Ett 0------- ,,,, ---------\y, ) 7 /, (-.), cc � I� r nf/ l �� / / PM Peak Hou ---i-.";"---'' 0 rO- \ J1� °J\� alt � ) ` O3 ` 151 tots r igNmtie" i 1______ 43/1— A, 01:09 ___. 0 Or o. 16 t wti�377 Id , .---_377 t /7:____I Estelle Edina Mixed-Use Development E2 4r 3-7 Spack Consulting Appendix E: Volumes S • ack CONSULTING Figure B32019 Build Peak Hour Volumes \`. i Y7'"7' - 'r 5 r s---- . ® 1 . i _ 1 `'� 4 � Google Earth .... AM Peak Hour 11111//'.1,'-'\1111) 'N.,,,.. \0-- ../,c l'. --a.--a. ,AY M 3f8 r 55 ' ' f1 f 66 \ ,ir / �q3r •--- ;A m1r- i ig§T 4k illi''--- tl'I 0/7 ' .e..- 0 ..,. — CP/'- ll ' 1 j is f o fmm 14 ,M1 Ask PM Peak Hoo, 0( b..4----;-_, ^nom i,- -,,,,,,. :, a ..),,,. ,,. .._, ,. ,o, ;8, —, ,_. ,,s3 ..4 _,. .__ 3. -7:- ._........ 5 _______---/ ___ sv6' Sia 0/7,7--:el-----,, 0 L°?:., 0 0 •,' _41 -- ,� t 1 1 /0.--- ,;, r r,, i 4,'.e, m , Estelle Edina Mixed Use Development E3 4t3 ` Spack Consulting Appendix E: Volumes S • ack CONSULTING Figure B4 ENGINEERING TRAFFIC FORWARD 2024 No Build Peak Hour Volumes 3 ilel til , a L t ® '-'' — 4 A Google Earth AM Peak Hour 46 •" 20 ,38 —, + 68 )\' �/( -, * 90 728 .— I8p 288 l 5 / r 1 -,T r' j �3r ~� 11 r' sat C. ' s\ 4,20 i I n r" o 47, PM Peak Hou 07- i''•_ m \ID J L 66p J L 67 •7( ,�7 J '. ,s6 62® --+ 26�i 19" } r 139/ ` 3,,N( 267 -� r iso 1Ir" / � a)r \\Q Mfr" itia WE 0 yry 0 0 alir, -47-N ( .4) 1 A 3,„ 16 �., 1, ..._... 688 w ase Estelle Edina Mixed-Use Development E4 Spack Consulting Appendix E: Volumes S • ack CONSULTING Figure B5 R (MUNE'i7PINC.TPAFF[C FORWAPD 2024 Build Peak Hour Volumes 0 „4 0 . ' 1 r ,.. . . f ,,_ ... ,_., ,.. - — 11 - ' (.5Y, - .- — — If-- a . 0 . ._ .. . . . . — -. - -...... ,.._,,,, ;, _ .... , . . ... . , . .. t- . . . ,, P. �➢” .h n+ —.,. � .%fib e,---, � ...w _:-t ..S 3' mom, ......... ...... ....._ A. i_____ . .._ .. •.. AM Peak Hour ,Rx „---- 3 4 xgY �9 J 30 29 9-g f g5 3p �� �- 191 56 !� �(-s A ;9g r all ''-- s§ 6 a., 0 s / 1� f L .4.,.. /C <d l -. o 1 / Jr r--. e, r. 1:',//—. , PM Peak Hou 0,--- P* 110/-- ,If 3 , agg ib5 ____" u N .- 1 r- ,--- --dr- 431 0,.1S $ 6 ,i'� h N 2E-2-_,11:1 , hh ei M1 �, Estelle Edina Mixed Use Development E5 A, l Spack Consulting Appendix F: Level of Service (LOS) S • ack CONSULTING Vo urne N0. 3 Level of Service (LOS) Level of Service(LOS)is a qualitative description,similar to typical school grades, that traffic engineers use to communi- cate how good or bad traffic operations are on a corridor, intersection, or interchange. Common Factors Traffic can be a hard thing to quantify as everyone has a Level of Service criteria have been developed for multiple different tolerance for congestion.What seems excessively types of traffic operations including: long to one person may seem good enough for another. . Intersections These differences are readily apparent when comparing small towns or rural areas, where five cars an hour can • Urban Corridors be the norm, to big cities or downtowns, where less than • Freeways hundred cars an hour, even in the middle of night, is rare. • Transit Service • Bicycle Operations To combat this issue and provide a consistent measuring • Pedestrian Operations tool for traffic studies, a "Level of Service" rating was developed. Level of Service ratings are based on the roadway or intersection characteristics and the amount of The most common LOS criteria used is for car operations at intersections; both signalized and unsignalized. For an traffic. Just like grade school, LOS A represents the best traffic operations, where traffic flows freely. LOS F, on the intersection Level of Service analysis, average delay for cars travelling through the intersection is used to determine other hand, represents failing operations, where the road or intersection is congested and running beyond maximum the appropriate grade. A high delay results in a poor LOS capacity. LOS E is typically considered "at capacity" which rating and equates to poor operations. Similarly, low delay means the amount of traffic is right at the level the roadway results in a good LOS rating and equates to good or great or intersection can adequately accommodate. Using Level operations. of Service letter grades provides an easy way to convey LOS can be determined for the intersection as a whole, or road operations to the general public and has been adopted for individual movements.It is common during peak periods across the United States. in major population areas for an intersection to have an acceptable overall LOS rating, but fail to achieve a good grade for individual movements. Common Factors Impacting Level of Service •Number of Lanes. 904 •Traffic Volumes. S0 •Intersection Control (stop sign, signal, roundabout, interchange.) 70 •Amount of access on a corridor. •Percentage of turning traffic. 50 •Traffic signal cycle length (green time devoted to each it" 40 ------ LOSE LOSD approach) and phasing (one green for all approach c 30 movements or separate green arrows.) LOSD 20 •Percentage of heavy trucks. ! � •Roadway Grades. 10 •Distribution of traffic within a peak hour as well as over the 0 Unsignalized S g ial ze.i course of a day. int«sectbn intersxrM; •Pedestrian activity. •Bicycle activity. Estelle Edina Mixed-Use Development Fl 111 Spack Consulting Appendix F: Level of Service (LOS) Although a Level of Service There are many tools and guidelines used to determine a ''; rating of A represents the best roads Level of Service rating. Simple tools like generalized .. -- 'x F ,, traffic operations,itis not always roadway capacities allow for planning-level efforts. While '.";- the most desirable. Providing inexpensive and quick to complete,they are not as accurate .,.- .,,,41.- a , - LOS A for all corridors and all as other options. More complicated tools, such as mi- operations at all times would cro-simulations, provide more accurate results, but cost require a significant amount of more and take more time. It is important to understand the LOS A land to be devoted to the road trade-offs between the analysis types as well as the purpose infrastructure, which makes it of the study. - extremely costly to build and maintain. During non-peak ;' - times, like overnight, much of that infrastructure would sit �• ..e, 1, unused. , .. On the opposite side of the LOS C spectrum, a Level of Service i rating of E and F represent traffic >., Detailed Analysis operations close to breaking m signal Timing,Corridor Evaluation down, or that already have. g (Micro-Scopic Analysis) n Pa At. {: illtr - ;1 These ratings mean high delays, a -- Operational Analysis -------- r .-` ' 4 longqueues, and slow speeds, Intersection Needs,Geometric Oedsions -, „. P C (Macro-ScopicAnalysis) . . not to mention driver frustration. __ f___"_. �' . a - Preliminary Engineering � °' w `� Instead of trying to achieve ROW Needs,Cost Estimates I (Spreadsheet/FormulaAnalysis) one or the other, government ,r LOS D = Acceptable agencies try to strike a balance planning level between providing acceptable `ongTermizedL Plans,ROW Needs (Generalized LOSTables) ' operations, neither falling nor r..._. - —" Effort/co f I Effort/Complexity �� flowing too freely. Because of this, LOS D is typically Source:Florida Deptarment of Transportation ``i considered the lowest LOS .:....- ° acceptable by government �- f" agencies and is reflective of a Pt , „5.µi' balanced approach between LOS F = Unacceptable cost and benefit. Source:City of San Jose,CA. Resources •Florida Department of Transportation Quality/Level of Service •Highway Capacity Manual,fifth edition Handbook • Nation Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 616; • http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/programs/sm/ Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets los/pdfs/2009FDOTQLOS Handbook.pdf •http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp rpt 616. pdf About This Brief Spack Consulting prepared this brief as part of our company's vision to significantly improve the practice of traffic engineering and transportation planning. Transportation professionals from around the world have assisted us in developing this document. We are providing this brief under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Feel free to use-modify-share this guide, but please give us some credit in your document. To request our whole series of Design Briefs and to be included on our distribution list for new materials, please email mspack@spackconsulting.com. And please reach out if you have any comments or questions related to this Design Brief. S • ack Mike n S PACK COUNT INGIto ii INNY; traffic CCIr 5.clnml ACADEMY TRAFFIC DATA INC. CONSULTIlie Edina Mixed-Use Development F2 14-1 4 Spack Consulting Appendix G: Capacity Analysis Generated with MI VISTRO cm Version 5.00-00 Scenario 1: 1 Existing AM CONSULTING Vistro File: C:\...\Edina Estelle.vistro Scenario 1 Existing AM Report File: C:\...\Existing AM Peak Report.pdf 7/18/2017 Intersection Analysis Summary ID Intersection Name Control Type Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS 1 W 70th St&Valley View Rd Roundabout HCM 6th Edition EB Thru 4.6 A 2 France Ave S &W 69th St Signalized HCM 6th EB Left 0.342 21.2 C Edition 3 Valley View Rd &W 69th St Two-way stop HCM 6th Edition NEB Left 0.119 14.9 B 4 France Ave S &W 70th St Signalized HCM 6th NB Left 0.304 16.0 B Edition 5 France Ave & Site Access 3 Two-way stop HCM 6th Edition EB Right 0.010 12.5 B 7 Valley View Rd &Site Access HCM 6th Two-way stop NWB Left 0.002 9.3 A 5 Edition 9 W 69th St& Site Access 1 Two-way stop HCM 6th Edition NB Right 0.004 9.5 A 16 W 69th St&Site Access 2 Two-way stop HCM 6th Edition NB Right 0.003 9.5 A 22 Valley View Rd & Site Access HCM 6th Two-way stop WB Left 0.001 9.3 A 4 Edition V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst(highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. Estelle Edina Mixed-Use Development G1A tt-lb Spack Consulting Figure 4: Existing Level of Service N_ a W 60TH ST W 62ND S7 W ES Lb o tr (;) W a a d W65THST m . : W65THST W 66TH ST rrti r"'+71 r-- Ca w Q N CC { nixW 69TH ST Si�� � a W 70TH ST 0 A 0 ♦ ♦ A, a a • 0 Signal HAZELTON RD stop Control a oRoundabout Ct iY IONS- [Mot OM* m O SignapU ad nuat.- gn ..t. o to 20 I PARKLAWN AVE < r^ lY �J 0 �? A W 76TH ST a W 78TH ST MINNESOTA DR ".,,,. Il 'P W 78TH ST 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Mies iV tisair` A 2015 Existing Level of Service i WSB SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 10 1414a FORECASTED 2040 CONDITIONS The regional Travel Demand Model developed by Metropolitan Council and used for the City's current(2008) Transportation Plan, was utilized to obtain base 2040 forecasts for traffic growth in the area.The models were updated with projected traffic and the forecasted 2040 level of service was determined at the study area intersections. Subsequently,an alternative analysis was conducted with updated information on development density in the City's Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) in the Southdale area.The regional Travel Demand Model was rerun with the higher density conditions and traffic growth rates were estimated for the year 2040 with the higher density developments in place. Using the growth rates obtained from this alternative,the Synchro/SimTraffic model was updated to reflect higher traffic forecasts and the Level of Service under this scenario.Areas of concern were highlighted. Proposed Development Density Scenario's In order to understand the impacts of increasing the density of development in the Southdale Area,an alternative was analyzed which involved increasing the development density in future leading to higher number of trips. Table 1 below shows the assumptions used in this alternative.The increased density was assumed to be in form of number of households Table 1:Population and Households Assumptions 2040 2040 Number Comp Plan Population- Of 2040 2040 Number of Average High Density High Households- Population- Households- Density Assumption Increase Density High Density TAZ Base Scenario Base Scenario (Units/Acre) (Units/Acre) Factor Scenario Scenario 512 2170 1130 21.00 50.00 2.4 5167 2690 513 5060 2610 19.75 48.00 2.4 12298 6343 514 280 130 43.50 100.00 2.3 644 299 515 3110 1550 33.50 65.00 1.9 6034 3007 517 1560 680 22.80 50.00 2.2 3421 1491 518 6470 2910 9.55 14.25 1.5 9654 4342 519 1930 880 10.35 13.25 1.3 2471 1127 Total 20580 9890 N/A 39689 19299 These assumptions correspond to trip generation numbers from each zone as shown in Table 2 below. Table 2:Change in Number of Trips 2040 Base Scenario 2040 High Density Scenario Total Change Absolute Percent TAZ Productions Attractions Total Productions Attractions Total Change Change 512 11340 18641 29981 20810 24249 45059 15078 50% 513 25413 32107 57520 47950 45611 93561 36041 63% 514 9836 23915 33751 11116 24632 35749 1998 6% 515 14735 19284 34019 24425 24633 49059 15040 44% 517 15669 40355 56024 22234 43488 65722 9698 17% 518 25110 19261 44371 36392 24980 61372 17001 38% 519 9106 11176 20282 11053 12177 23230 2948 15% it— SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 11 Figure 5 shows the increase in households and population along with resulting trip increases from each Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ). Figure 5:TAZ Trip Increase Assumptions 1 I 42 T 515 amp Plan Density 33.5 increased Density 65 Factor 1 9 HH Increase 1457 Pop Increase 2924 Tons Change 44% TAZ 519 Corrin Plan Density 10.35 TAZ;514 Increased Density 13 25 Comp Plan Density 43.5 Factor 1 3 Increased Density 100 HH Increase 247 Factor 2.3 Pop Increase 541 MH Increase 169 Trips Change 15% Pop Increase 364 Trips Change 6% I TAZ 513 TAZ 518 Comp Plan Density 19 7 Comp Plan Density 9.55 `. Increased Density 14 25 Density 48 2 4 NHFactor Factor 1.5 HH Increase 1432 HH Increase se 3733 PopIncrease 3164 Pop Increase 7238 Trips Change 63% Trips Change 38ri, j IAZ,512 Comp Plan Density 21 TAZ 517 increased Density 50 Camp Plan Density 22 8 Factor 2.4 100- Increased Density 50 HM Increase 1580 Factor 2 2 Pop Increase 2997 HH Increase 811 Tips Change 50% Pop Increase 1681 Tnps Ch .17% 0 01 02 04 49" titfri". A High Density Scenario Increases a�61;4v � WSB r— SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 12 The turning movement volumes for the PM peak hour in 2040 were estimated based on the ADT growth percentages derived from the model for various links. The turning movements were then simulated in the Synchro/SimTraffic network.Figure 11 shows the 2040 Level of Service assuming growth levels consistent with the 2040 regional Travel Demand model. Figure 11: 2040 Base Condition Level of Service W 60111 ST N W 62ND ST 111 G • C • W 65TH ST I W 65TH ST W 66TH ST • •• ) • ll • • LAO J � • • • W 69TH ST W74THST ♦ A A A U ♦ • a Signal HA2ELTON RD Stop Cortra • S W U' ` Qoundabo..t O x 2 0 °svwer�e uww�. ai6w atc W 0 10.20 16tH PARKIAWN AVE Q k—; _ ce W 76TH ST ■ ■ MINNESOTA DR L.' l,_, W 76TH ST W 78TH ST 0 0 1 0.2 0 4 h 2040 Base Level of Service M ', WSB SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 19 Projected 2040 Conditions Analysis The turning movement volumes for the PM peak hour were adjusted from the base condition based on the ADT growth percentages derived from the high density scenario model.Figure 12 shows the Level of Service at the study intersections in the High Density Scenario assuming no significant improvements to the intersections from current conditions. The results indicate that in general most intersections with either the 2040 Base conditions or 2040 High Density conditions would continue to operate at an overall Level of Service (LOS) D or better,with the exception of: 2040 Base Condition: 1. York Avenue at W. 78th Street= LOS F 2. Minnesota Drive at Edinborough Way= LOS F 3. France Avenue at TH 62 North Ramp = LOS E 4. France Avenue at W. 76th Street= LOS E 5. Hazelton Road at Target Access = LOS E 2040 High Density Condition: 1. York Avenue at W. 78th Street= LOS F 2. Minnesota Drive at Edinborough Way= LOS F 3. York Avenue at Parklawn Avenue= LOS F 4. France Avenue at TH 62 North Ramp = LOS E 5. Xerxes Avenue at TH 62 North Ramp = LOS E 6. France Avenue at Parklawn Avenue= LOS E 7. France Avenue at W. 76th Street= LOS E 8. Hazelton Road at Target Access = LOS E 9. France Avenue at Minnesota Drive = LOS E It should be noted that at some intersections which are not operating at an overall LOS E or F,may still be individual movements that are at LOS E or F.Figure 13 shows individual movements that are at LOS E or F at the study intersections. In addition to the intersections listed above,as development continues to occur in the Southdale area particular attention should be given to the following intersections as part of any traffic analysis prepared,which could be operating at LOS F: 1. France Avenue at W. 66th Street-Westbound approach 2. France Avenue at W. 65th Street-Southbound left turn 3. France Avenue at W. 69th Street-Westbound approach, Southbound left turn 4. France Avenue at W. 70th Street-Westbound left turn 5. France Avenue at Hazelton Road-Westbound approach,Northbound and Southbound left turns 6. France Avenue at Gallagher Drive-Westbound approach, Eastbound left turn 7. Valley View Road at W. 69th Street-Southbound approach 8. Minnesota Drive at W. 77th Street-Southbound left turn 9. York Avenue at W. 69th Street-Westbound approach 10.York Avenue at Hazelton Road-Westbound approach,Northbound left turn 11.Edinborough Way at W. 76th Street-Northbound approach SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 20 Figure 12:2040 High Density Scenario Level of Service r—I W 60TH ST ,— W 62W:0ST k..) lit 124 o cc w tIO) a a 4 II W 65TH ST al a w 65TH ST W 66TH ST , 0 , II Ca CC rl 0 CO I 1U > < lb • a 1111 • 6114" W 69TH ST ..1 y, I Si IC--'--------- a W 70TH ST t I - 0411, 4111A III I ) ,, 0 Srignal ' t'"'' HAI:ELTON RD Stop Control III 2 V 0 ao.ndabout 0 3 4 CC X LQS Ociar i m:vaiii i_ 0 0 tiumlik,-.1 ^1.1 ea ›. 0, Z 6 i0 040 10-20 10-ti PARKLAWN AVE W ca it 0 ItA . „ „... U sao Is-so ,i1 ,.ht, _ WM' ' 0 • w TOTH ST W 78TH ST MINNESOTA DR I I I II II W 78114 ST ‘,/ 0 01 02 04 'nil .......c-i mites A 2040 High Density Scenario Level of Service LriN) WSB SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 21 /t-R--1 Figure 13: 2040 High Density Scenario LOS By Movement W 60TH ST N ) W 62ND ST II M0 1 c ir ui a re a * re 0 •W 65TH ST 1 a W 65TH ST W 66TH ST 0 0.11 a cc a it • tn > 5 a U) ..1 a a 5 4 tit, ,ir .. xiLi > W 17r is is q,.t. im W 69TH ST S 1 ------: 11 W 70TH ST Irk. A ' ' a 0 Signal "I et HAZELTON RD en Stop Control a X tli 0 > Roundabout r 0 .4 cc rt -11 0 )- ‘.0 UI 0 1C40 •C,.r, PARKLAWN AVE > 4, w c 26.3er s.:t < i-14 e ailr r. . 31165— • Z ni 'b It. .." oP 4 W 7fiTH ST SIIII W 78TH ST MINNESOTA DR -. , tilti 7-: W 78TH ST 0 0 01 0.2 0.4 Miles A ( 2040 High Density Scenario LOS By Movement a I ,-.),if g i*4 ,..tia,v t ..f WSB immomiiii, ,,,lil'Ilrit2't ,ifet; ',./I`NV 00( e. •Iria ;,,;',-"I't'WIPP cd'utiV i ulta. MN SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 22 A 14-r Southdale Area Transportation Study For: e • sup 0, 111171. %MINA City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55024 July 22, 2016 Prepared By: A WSB WSB &Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55416 SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY CITY OF EDINA l(.� WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 6 \ CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 6/2,01Z i i '''6C`;‘4) Charles T. Rickart, P.E. Date: July 22, 2016 Reg. No. 26082 SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 2 ISD TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTIFICATION 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 LIST of FIGURES/TABLES 3 INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 FORECASTED 2040 CONDITIONS 11 PEDESTRIAN NETWORK ANALYSIS 23 CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS 33 LIST of FIGURES / TABLES Figure 1 -Study Area Intersections 5 Figure 2 - Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes 7 Figure 3 - Level of Service Ranges 8 Figure 4-Existing Level of Service 10 Figure 5 -TAZ Trip Increase Assumptions 12 Figure 6-Transit Mode Share Assumptions 14 Figure 7 - 2040 Base Condition ADT 15 Figure 8-Base ADT Percentage Change 16 Figure 9 - 2040 High Density Scenario ADT 17 Figure 10- High Density Scenario ADT Percentage Change 18 Figure 11 - 2040 Base Condition Level of Service 19 Figure 12 - 2040 High Density Scenario Level of Service 21 Figure 13 - 2040 High Density Scenario LOS by Movement 22 Figure 14- Existing Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk System 24 Figure 15-Existing Comprehensive Plan Bicycle System 25 Figure 16- Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Generators 31 Figure 17- Future Pedestrian and Bicycle Generators 32 Table 1 -Population and Households Assumptions 11 Table 2 - Changes in Number of Trips 11 SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 3 Ai INTRODUCTION /BACKGROUND In 2008 WSB assisted the City in the development of a traffic model using the Synchro/SimTraffic modeling software for the Southeast area (Southdale) of the City.The study area was bounded by TH 62 (Crosstown) on the north,the Richfield/Edina border on the east,the Bloomington/Edina border on the south and TH 100 on the west.The model included 40 signalized intersections, 20 un-signalized intersections,and three roundabouts. The purpose in developing the model was to provide a consistent baseline for traffic analysis and to provide continuously updated results to help gauge the compound effect of multiple developments in the Southdale area. Since the model was completed,it has been used by several developers and the City in reviewing the area traffic impacts of proposed development.Although,the model has been continually updated with traffic characteristics from approved developments the original traffic conditions were based on 2007 traffic counts. It is now in need of updating and recalibration with new traffic counts. Also in 2008 WSB assisted the City in preparation of the Transportation Plan in conjunction with the Comprehensive Plan update.As part of the Transportation Plan a city wide transportation planning model was developed for the existing and future land use projections.Since the preparation of the land use projections in the Transportation Plan density changes have occurred in the Southdale area. In addition questions of the appropriate density have been asked for the area specifically on the west side of France Avenue. In March of 2015 the City Council appointed a working group that developed the Working Principles for the France Avenue Southdale Area.These principals will serve as a tool to guide the development process for the whole Southdale area,and demonstrate methods that might be used during the Comprehensive Plan update in 2018. In order to provide data to assist in moving this process to the next stages, development of transportation forecasts should be completed. The purpose of this Study is to: 1. Update the existing Synchro/SimTraffic traffic model in the Southdale area, Including expanding the study area to north of TH 62 to W. 60th Street; 2. Updating the CUBE transportation planning Regional Travel Demand model for the entire City,and; 3. Preparation of a transportation analysis for two land use density scenarios for the Southdale area. 4. Review and analysis of pedestrian/bicycle connections and conflicts in the Southdale area in relation to the local/regional system. Figure 1 shows the study area and intersections included with the analysis. The following sections of this memorandum provide an update on the data collection and preliminary study results. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 (5 PAGE 4 Figure 1: Study Area Intersections eit W 60TEI ST N 1 I W 62ND ST 0 : M III ci tr a I ot cx ft < is W 65TH ST CO 0 W 6STH s r W66/14 tr 11 SS II *8 0 ft 0 rx ill 111) 0 5 4 tir La tit 0 X -1 re › 0 ft oto 0 it fttm W 69TH ST X W TOTH ST 0 0 0 •• 0D 411 111 HA*LTON RD Study Intersections 410 Control Type 0 > IS Sgnatted it rr r tz O 0 el Step Craltrolicr to )- cra z # Rovidabout al CI PARKLAWN AVE > < IlAt irl mow" ID 0 z ..4t ce U- it 0 it it W 767.14 Si ft W18TH ST MINNESOTA DR lit 0 6 410 VI 78TH ST a 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Mlles eV A t---, Study Intersections WSB -...,, ,. Ausi.... ,.,„,, : .:,,,,Area Wain Update and Transportation Study F&rtcr. row SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 5 Ai 5-3 EXISTING CONDITIONS WSB collected traffic counts at 20 intersections and 20 roadway segments in the study area.These counts together with traffic counts provided by Hennepin County and the City of Edina were used to update the Synchro/SimTraffic models. Traffic signal timing information was updated based on information provided by Hennepin County. Lane geometry,new intersections, changes of intersection control,pedestrian timing and other information like speed limits were updated based on field visit to all the study intersections.Figure 2 shows the existing Average Daily Traffic volumes on the adjacent roadways. Traffic Analysis Methodology The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000(HCM).The HCM provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations. Intersections are given a Level of Service (LOS) grade from"A"to "F"to describe the average amount of control delay per vehicle as defined in the HCM. The LOS is primarily a function of peak traffic hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and the traffic controls at the intersection. LOS A is the best traffic operating condition,and drivers experience minimal delay at an intersection operating at that level. LOS E represents the condition where the intersection is at capacity,and some drivers may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through an intersection controlled by traffic signals. LOS F represents a condition where there is more traffic than can be handled by the intersection,and many vehicle operators may have to wait through more than one green phase to make it through the intersection.At a stop sign-controlled intersection, LOS F would be characterized by exceptionally long vehicle queues on each approach at an all-way stop, or long queues and/or great difficulty in finding an acceptable gap for drivers on the minor legs at a through-street intersection. The LOS ranges for both signalized and un-signalized intersections are shown in Figure 3. The threshold LOS values for un-signalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections.This variance was instituted because drivers'expectations at intersections differ with the type of traffic control.A given LOS can be altered by increasing (or decreasing) the number of lanes,changing traffic control arrangements, adjusting the timing at signalized intersections, or other lesser geometric improvements. LOS also changes as traffic volumes increase or decrease. LOS,as described, can also be determined for the individual legs (sometimes referred to as "approaches") or lanes (turn lanes in particular) of an intersection. It should be noted that a LOS E or F might be acceptable or justified in those cases where a leg(s) or lane(s) has a very low traffic volume as compared to the volume on the other legs. For example, improving LOS on such low-volume legs by converting a two-way stop condition to an all- way stop, or adjusting timing at a signalized intersection,could result in a significant penalty for the many drivers on the major road while benefiting the few on the minor road. Also,geometric improvements on minor legs,such as additional lanes or longer turn lanes, could have limited positive effects and might be prohibitive in terms of benefit to cost. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 6 Ms' Figure 2: Existing Average Daily Traffic Volumes 1.0 rn C 10000 16000 17100 0 o 0 Lr, 0 LR N N 0 10200 ^I 10600 9300 4850 0 S 0 8 m 3500 8000 12600 CO86O© J• 0 0 1 0.2 0.4 ..,,,. Miles "L., A Existing ADT tA WSB SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670A'' PAGE 7 Figure 3 -Level of Service Ranges for Signalized and Un-signalized Intersections to 80 a, — c U Q a LOSE LOS F 5 d U a 50 U LOS D o ,.. LOS E oa 35 35 v LOSC c' LOSP 0 v °25 20 0 o LOS C 0) LOS B Z 15 LOSE U 10 10 LOS A LOS A Z Signalized Intersection Unsignalized Intersection SOURCE:Level of Service thresholds from the Highway Capacity Manual,2000. Although LOS A represents the best possible level of traffic flow,the cost to construct roadways and intersection to such a high standard often exceeds the benefit to the user. Funding availability might also lead to acceptance of intersection or roadway designs with a lower LOS.An overall LOS D is generally accepted as the lowest acceptable level in urban areas. LOS C is often considered to be the desirable minimum level for rural areas. LOS D or E may be acceptable for limited durations or distances,or for very low-volume legs of some intersections. The LOS analysis was performed using Synchro/SimTraffic: • Synchro,a software package that implements Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodologies,was used to build each signalized intersection and provide an input database for turning-movement volumes,lane geometrics,and signal design and timing characteristics. In addition, Synchro was used to optimize signal timing parameters for future conditions. Output from Synchro is transferred to SimTraffic, the traffic simulation model. • SimTraffic is a micro-simulation computer modeling software that simulates each individual vehicle's characteristics and driver behavior in response to traffic volumes,intersection configuration,and signal operations. The model simulates drivers'behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It outputs estimated vehicle delay and queue lengths at each intersection being analyzed. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 8 / 15L Existing Conditions Analysis The turning movement counts obtained from the field counts were input into the Synchro/SimTraffic model using the existing roadway geometrics and intersection control. The SimTraffic model was then run for five replications.The output from the five simulations was then averaged. It should be noted that Roundabouts and Stop Controlled intersections are classified as un- signalized intersections and have different delay thresholds than signalized intersections according to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The result of the analysis indicates that in general most intersections are operating at an acceptable overall Level of Service (LOS) D or better,with the exception of: 1. York Avenue at W. 78th Street= LOS F 2. France Avenue at TH 62 North Ramp = LOS E 3. France Avenue at W. 76th Street= LOS E Figure 4 shows the existing Level of Service (LOS) at each of the study area intersections. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 9 X415 7 Figure 4:Existing Level of Service W60THST ` i 1 ) i 4_1 W62N0ST IM O K W it W 65TH ST °D a w 65TH ST W 66TH ST ._; • ,a cca * to W x cc a (I) a W 69TH ST W 70Th ST a 1110 O Signal • HAZELTON RD en Stop Control a o Q kir�ndabout _.. 0 gg gg 1.05 ONor iwtitia m 0' „syin.raao u�wgpw►-*i to 2 0,10 0.10 C 4-20 10,'15 PARKLAWN AVE , - C 20,15 15-25 W v--j a 0 35.55 26J5 U g- '' 5640 35.60 -- 2 a { W 76TH STII 1111 W78THST MINNESOTA DR 494 W 78TH ST 0 0 0 1 0.2 0.4 O Miles i 2015 Existing Level of Service WSB c- ,........ Southriote Area Mode! ....ladote and rrar,sportation Study rima MN SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 10 FORECASTED 2040 CONDITIONS The regional Travel Demand Model developed by Metropolitan Council and used for the City's current(2008) Transportation Plan, was utilized to obtain base 2040 forecasts for traffic growth in the area.The models were updated with projected traffic and the forecasted 2040 level of service was determined at the study area intersections. Subsequently,an alternative analysis was conducted with updated information on development density in the City's Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) in the Southdale area.The regional Travel Demand Model was rerun with the higher density conditions and traffic growth rates were estimated for the year 2040 with the higher density developments in place.Using the growth rates obtained from this alternative,the Synchro/SimTraffic model was updated to reflect higher traffic forecasts and the Level of Service under this scenario.Areas of concern were highlighted. Proposed Development Density Scenario's In order to understand the impacts of increasing the density of development in the Southdale Area,an alternative was analyzed which involved increasing the development density in future leading to higher number of trips. Table 1 below shows the assumptions used in this alternative.The increased density was assumed to be in form of number of households Table 1:Population and Households Assumptions 2040 2040 Number Comp Plan Population- Of 2040 2040 Number of Average High Density High Households- Population- Households- Density Assumption Increase Density High Density TAZ Base Scenario Base Scenario (Units/Acre) (Units/Acre) Factor Scenario Scenario 512 2170 1130 21.00 50.00 2.4 5167 2690 513 5060 2610 19.75 48.00 2.4 12298 6343 514 280 130 43.50 100.00 2.3 644 299 515 3110 1550 33.50 65.00 1.9 6034 3007 517 1560 680 22.80 50.00 2.2 3421 1491 518 6470 2910 9.55 14.25 1.5 9654 4342 519 1930 880 10.35 13.25 1.3 2471 1127 Total 20580 9890 N/A 39689 19299 These assumptions correspond to trip generation numbers from each zone as shown in Table 2 below. Table 2:Change in Number of Trips 2040 Base Scenario 2040 High Density Scenario Total Change Absolute Percent TAZ Productions Attractions Total Productions Attractions Total Change Change 512 11340 18641 29981 20810 24249 45059 15078 50% 513 25413 32107 57520 47950 45611 93561 36041 63% 514 9836 23915 33751 11116 24632 35749 1998 6% 515 14735 19284 34019 24425 24633 49059 15040 44% 517 15669 40355 56024 22234 43488 65722 9698 17% 518 25110 19261 44371 36392 24980 61372 17001 38% 519 9106 11176 20282 11053 12177 23230 2948 15% SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 11 ii- I VI Figure 5 shows the increase in households and population along with resulting trip increases from each Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ). Figure 5:TAZ Trip Increase Assumptions sod 62 T 515 Plan Density 33.5 Increased Density 65 Factor 1 9 NH Increase 1457 Pop Increase 2924 Tngs Champ$4491 TAI 519 Cone Plan Density 10 35 TAZ;514 Increased Density 13 25 Comp Plan Density 43.5 Factor 1,3 Increased Densay 100 HH Increase 247 Factor 2.3 Pop Increase 541 HH Increase 169 Trips Change 15% Pop Increase 364 Trips Change 8' TAZ 513 TAT S18 5Comp Plan Density 19 Comp Plan Density9.55 ',creased Densrry 48 Incosed Density td 9. odor 2.4 55 Factor 1.5 • HH Increase 1432 H Increase 3733 Pop Increase 3184 'op Increase ...� Trips Change ape Change 6633% TAZ,512 Comp Plan Density 21 TAZ 517 Increased Density 50 Comp Plan Density 22 8 Factor 2.4 Increased Density 50 HH Increase 1560 2�r Factor 2 2 Pop Increase 2997 HH Increase 811 Trips Change 50 e. Pop Increase 1861 Trips Change.17% 0 CCI 02 04 tTiP A High Density Scenario Increases ew, 4 WSB SOUTH DALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 12 Transit Model Assumptions Transit is a key component to the transportation system in the Southdale area. In 2014 Metro Transit opened the Southdale Transit Center and Park&Ride facility.The Transit Center is located southwest of the York Avenue and 66th Street intersection, on the east side of Southdale Center near the entrance to JC Penney.The site includes 70 surface Park &Ride parking spaces,with overflow parking for additional vehicles east of the Southdale Center ring road. Transit service is provided to the Southdale Center from 8 primary routes including: • Route 6-to Minneapolis (urban local) • Route 515 -to Bloomington, 66th Street Richfield,METRO Blue Line (VA Medical Center,Mall of America) • Route 537-to Bloomington,Normandale College • Route 538 -to south Bloomington,METRO Blue Line (Mall of America) • Route 578-to Minneapolis (express) • Route 579-to U of M (express) • Route 684-to Minneapolis, Eden Praire,Chanhassen and Chaska (SouthWest Transit) • Route 694-to Eden Praire, Chaska,Normandale College, Richfield (Southwest Transit) The Metropolitan Council regional Travel Demand Model assumes a Transit mode share for the area when determining the future traffic projection.This percentage for the study area was 3.5% on the average.The transit mode percentage varies by TAZ and the value for each TAZ is shown in Figure 6. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 13 Figure 6:Transit Mode Share Assumptions i s I i---............13.................... ../ -11 . TAZ:515 Transit Mode Share.4.6 TAZ:514 TAZ 519 Transit Mode Share:2.9% Transit Mode Share:2.4°. TAZ:513 Transit Mode Share:4 2",. TAZ 518 Transit Mode Share.2 4' i TAZ:512 Transit Mode Share:5.4;. i TAZ:517 a...4 Transit Mode Share:2.6'.v 0 0 1 0 2 0 4 _.........01111111111111111.11Jl�f,1r- •T7� �Ii g." `•: A Transit Mode Share By TAZ ig IPJ WSB SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 Al 7 i PAGE 14 Figure 7 shows the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) as forecasted by the regional Travel Demand Model for the year 2040 base condition. Figure 7: 2040 Base Conditions ADT ca I O 0 O Lrl 10100 f%123300 21300 O O 0 00 O O‘ M �D 10300 13000 10100 5000 0 O m w O 3500 8600 13300 o .))� 1.p200 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 1 Miles 2040 Base ADT Forecast . e Q( WSB Sourhdo,`e Area '.?O(:rl Update ona Tr:,nyportotron study Fdir,o, SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 A17 PAGE 15 Figure 8 shows the percentage change in ADT as forecasted by the regional Travel Demand Model between the base model year(2010) and the year 2040. Figure 8:Base Condition ADT Percentage Change 1% All 0 W60THt'i I W 62NO ST• 5"/0 •a Cts 8,8% - , a d W 65TH ST W 65TH ST 1% '- 29.8',', ► CO a U, Lu erllt 1- Lil ri 4 rr 10/ f * W 89TH ST W 70TH ST 27.3% i 2.5% �•+ 4.9% fl 48.6% M r. HAZELTON RD T Legend 0) 3°1° 0 a C1 Growth Rates n j� 0 o NZ r► <25 o m 44. a 4em+4. 25.1-500 o $."�% 8 4 0 50.1 -75.0 t",3 r l ..%.. ! _' ..i « u, 4 ► 75.1 - 100.0 v a 40001I. >100 8.8% 80.3% 6.7% 0..76TH ST 0 el • MINNESOTA DR19%r e� �2 BA 5t1°!°4 a 5% w 78TH ST W 78TH Si , 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 n. Miles Cr4,C A 2010-2040 Base ADT Percentage Change SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 16 Al 73 Figure 9 shows the forecasted 2040 ADT for the high density scenario. Figure 9:2040 High Density Scenario ADT N f � o 0 trl 10100 `N 24000 22300 c felo C3 ct o .-1 ...� 10300 r", 1400P 10600 5400 Ck Cl h C C t+t fY 51C{) 8700 14300 •`• ry 0 12200 c 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Miles 2040 High Density Scenario ADT Forecast WSB • SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 17 417 `F- Figure 10 shows the percentage change in ADT for the increased density scenario from year 2040 and the base model year (2010). Figure 10: High Density Scenario ADT Percentage Change 1% N W t<.:3T H ST _I1 W62ND5T 5.6% LE Q ' go in 0 a Ki ti LTi 10,5% a W 65TH ST o W 65TH 5T 1% !;:ii 20%" 36.2% x N • w ›- t 41 to) w .4 N a 1% X W 69Th ST 38.45% 17.3% 13.4% e .► 143.2% eq 4 HA7_EL.TON RD z w Legend 2.13-; ° n 410 e s.x 4.......6. c25 0" 4,:—► 25.1-50.0 V 14 p 4 ' 501 -75.0 PARILAWU AVE 65.55'o > < M --► 75.1 -100.0 z '" 01.00.10 >100 9.8% fl 1120 16.2% W 76111 ST o M ' Ip 1/4?. ng gn r 6'@ 16.2% W78THSi MINNESOTA OR - , y W7$1H r 0 0.1 0.2 04 Miles =- A 2010-2040 High Density ADT Percentage Change {� ) WSB .;. ,.7 Traz,:porta on fir:; !. I SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 At -7 C PAGE 18 The turning movement volumes for the PM peak hour in 2040 were estimated based on the ADT growth percentages derived from the model for various links.The turning movements were then simulated in the Synchro/SimTraffic network.Figure 11 shows the 2040 Level of Service assuming growth levels consistent with the 2040 regional Travel Demand model. Figure 11: 2040 Base Condition Level of Service la W 66TH ST N W 62ND ST90, II Liii o w Ei 7 ccQ W 65TH ST m W 65TH ST W GUM ST ,, w ,,,, x 1 N W w > > a >- N w _ LU W > Ux w69THST W 70TH ST A t, A .. [1 0%ii-al HAZE LION RD H 5tc,r([antro; i s w 0 4 Nounb dao..• O leI tIr m .d Syna1 ed u 07 Z010 W 0 1D-2O-..1G-1`. PAR KL.AWN AVE Q W 2035 1825 w _.__. 16.56 25.15 U E ,: 55-QO 15.50 Z 4 •M1 ce U- W 76TH ST i w "8TH ST MINNESOTA OR ■ ttit W 78TH ST 0 0 1 0-2 0 4 Kies tpili 4'i,e A 2040 Base Level of Service , r 44WSB 4•7'sww a SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 PAGE 19 4lic. Projected 2040 Conditions Analysis The turning movement volumes for the PM peak hour were adjusted from the base condition based on the ADT growth percentages derived from the high density scenario model.Figure 12 shows the Level of Service at the study intersections in the High Density Scenario assuming no significant improvements to the intersections from current conditions.The results indicate that in general most intersections with either the 2040 Base conditions or 2040 High Density conditions would continue to operate at an overall Level of Service (LOS) D or better,with the exception of: 2040 Base Condition: 1. York Avenue at W. 78th Street= LOS F 2. Minnesota Drive at Edinborough Way= LOS F 3. France Avenue at TH 62 North Ramp = LOS E 4. France Avenue at W. 76th Street= LOS E 5. Hazelton Road at Target Access = LOS E 2040 High Density Condition: 1. York Avenue at W. 78th Street= LOS F 2. Minnesota Drive at Edinborough Way= LOS F 3. York Avenue at Parklawn Avenue= LOS F 4. France Avenue at TH 62 North Ramp =LOS E 5. Xerxes Avenue at TH 62 North Ramp = LOS E 6. France Avenue at Parklawn Avenue = LOS E 7. France Avenue at W. 76th Street= LOS E 8. Hazelton Road at Target Access = LOS E 9. France Avenue at Minnesota Drive = LOS E It should be noted that at some intersections which are not operating at an overall LOS E or F,may still be individual movements that are at LOS E or F.Figure 13 shows individual movements that are at LOS E or F at the study intersections. In addition to the intersections listed above,as development continues to occur in the Southdale area particular attention should be given to the following intersections as part of any traffic analysis prepared,which could be operating at LOS F: 1. France Avenue at W. 66th Street-Westbound approach 2. France Avenue at W. 65th Street-Southbound left turn 3. France Avenue at W. 69th Street-Westbound approach, Southbound left turn 4. France Avenue at W. 70th Street-Westbound left turn 5. France Avenue at Hazelton Road-Westbound approach, Northbound and Southbound left turns 6. France Avenue at Gallagher Drive-Westbound approach, Eastbound left turn 7. Valley View Road at W. 69th Street-Southbound approach 8. Minnesota Drive at W. 77th Street-Southbound left turn 9. York Avenue at W. 69th Street-Westbound approach 10.York Avenue at Hazelton Road-Westbound approach, Northbound left turn 11.Edinborough Way at W. 76th Street- Northbound approach SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 r I PAGE 20 Figure 12:2040 High Density Scenario Level of Service W60THST N W 62ND ST ' -, ■ pi G cc • cc a • d •W 65TH ST m ■W 65TH ST W 66TH ST ,, ■ a cc ■ W m W > a ✓ m x J IX ? a a ■ W 69TH ST a W7OT1ST A 0 A a a HAZELTON RD N Stao CanVol a W O > R4,nAaboot Y Cr rt LCG C44a,is'r4o • O CO` s.7. ..rt t p :-.:4 V) Z 0,10 Ora a tato tats PARKLAWN AVE -' C .S 4 • 26.15 10.15 tL W II ti 1555 23-75 U Z E SS-110 35.50 4 -so ,..., oc ,6`� 1 i W 76TH ST IIIW 78TH ST MINNESOTA OR I ., 1111 GP W 78TH ST 0 0 0 1 0 2 0.4 iMles .== ,s 2040 High Density Scenario Level of Service tai � 4 WSB SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 41 --7 21 Figure 13: 2040 High Density Scenario LOS By Movement W60THST N ' 1 W 62ND ST i4 m rii. G lcc ;`�� t II� W 65TH ST m a W 65TH ST W 66TH ST • *a a cc a O to W > 4 } N x 1 SI`r ® a ' at W 69TH ST 1111 W TOTH ST r A • A i'r 1 1 0 Signal '► HAZELTON RD Stoptontrol a xW o < &Sunda6out IFO Y p( d' LOS NCH 4v.oM Manakin, lanwontattad N� := coo { 0 tO W 0 IG:0 1615 PARKLAWN AVE < h.,, wC =5 W 35 W 4 3 0 W 76TH ST AC itf .,. • W 78TH ST MINNESOTA DR _' . W 78TH ST a 0 0.1 0.2 0A Miles 2040 High Density Scenario LOS By Movement AW'' L'I"SB r itr`f,f7`11F ,jtf , tiZ7' (`;' '),. Iff,': i. ,;,ir;rr .td, F'.;figiv SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 A171 PAGE 22 PEDESTRIAN NETWORK ANALYSIS The purpose of the pedestrian and bicycle analysis was to highlight existing and potential future pedestrian and bicycle trip generation and needs in the Southdale area.The analysis is separated into five sections.The first section provides documentation of the existing pedestrian and bicycle system in the Southdale Area; the second provides background considerations about pedestrian and bicycle trip generation;the third section describes existing pedestrian and bicycle trip generators;the fourth section identified potential pedestrian and bicycle trip generators based on planned development in the Southdale area,and; the fifth section includes general conclusions for walking and bicycling in the Southdale area. Existing Pedestrian/Bicycle System There are some existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities in place in the Southdale area.The existing and planned sidewalk and bicycle networks are shown in Figures 14&15.There are sidewalks in place on many of the streets in the commercial and higher-density residential areas of the study area, including France Avenue,W. 66th Street,W. 70th Street, and York Avenue. In most cases,there are sidewalks along both sides of these roadways. While there are sidewalks in place along many of the busier streets in the study area,there are some challenges for pedestrians. In some locations there are narrow sidewalks at the back of the curb. Many pedestrians feel uncomfortable walking close to busy roadways,and it can be a challenge to keep back-of-curb sidewalks clear of snow and ice in the winter. Additionally,it can be uncomfortable for pedestrians to cross four-and six-lane roadways within the study area. Crossing distances can be long due to the number of through and turn lanes.The City of Edina has begun to address these challenges in some locations, including France Avenue.The sidewalks and intersections along France Avenue have recently been upgraded to provide a more comfortable pedestrian experience for people walking along and across France Avenue.There is a very limited sidewalk network in the residential areas west of France Avenue, and within large commercial developments such as Southdale Center. There is a limited bicycle network in place within the study area.The Edina Promenade is an off-street shared use path that extends from W. 70th Street through Centennial Lakes Park.There is also an off-street path along Parklawn Avenue.There are bike lanes and shared lane markings in place along W. 70th Street west of France Avenue.Cornelia Drive is also a bicycle boulevard. The lack of dedicated bicycle facilities creates challenges for people bicycling within the study area.West of France Avenue,many of the low-volume local streets are comfortable for bicycling without dedicated bicycle facilities. However,the street grid is interrupted in this area and many of the low-traffic local streets do not provide direct connections.There are very few bicycle facilities within the commercial and high-density residential areas in the eastern half of the study area. The street network in this area is not conducive to on-street bicycling without dedicated bicycle facilities.Many of the streets in this area are high-volume,multilane roadways. Most people do not feel comfortable sharing a lane with motorists under these conditions. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 41% PAGE 23 Figure 14-Existing Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk System i , -- . r---, , , w a r , , . . ......,..._ ........ , ,...„,„, . 4 ICI,2 f '',...-...' all i 1 'r' ( �!r ii . i kij Ar't ti(\y, t, I -4,„ .»-_,imp t .... , 1 J 4 .. 0141.0. �� d , «,»'. k‘l ,....... ..? ...o r" 1 r i ,,,,,....\_'-"----.....41 `) (,,,,_04(::_ __ . \ ir, \„...,) . id, t , ...... _d ..,...\ z ; c \....... � r w L.- Legend ,—ernertg ....«Future ....Future •0•• Faure ,...< Iuiure Bodey . Stite- et S<drvrs* Atiive%Wes Ckty StdrwoOk Weir k4bte Creek To Sshtoi Stdewak Room/0 Tro0 r w L._1 ail 0.1.***,3114 SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 Ai G PAGE 24 Figure 15-Existing Comprehensive Plan Bicycle System Bicycle Facilities ° " Bike Routes',signed and+or marked as) rwhM w+E samma Advisory Bike lams ammo Bare or Shared Use Paths "•"�',i"' et • Bike Boulevards 'e"_Green Shand Baan Lams B#ae Lanes Shared Lane Revamps Sgned Bate Routes "`° " , Approved Plenary Route Approved Seconder/Route i woo s a+w1 1•••••v asw++� , 4,4,4 1888411 Mt 148 � �jj Fi i hM .., .,..wed. .. ...c.NU�r PA # a. i.g,if P'''' ,,,,,, $ Abs a � "1 tut Fayr a, �N W• v II _ " , F I� '� a I114•114# t Mr i °',y trlbfK x ... � ` % -4� ° 4. tirsobere a ..t.s... ref A taw • Ai FO ab it `" ' " "jJa g 881••88 :# ' C3....H. eiga."*. 1; ..,,A., w...Tv/5,, „„ .,. , 4 /I ' 1:011,' p..slet raacw'. ' '�- s ... 110 �,�.d . ,.,,,,r ., Tk a'-� . sane SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 4 f g PAGE 25 Pedestrian and Bicycle Trip Generation Background Unlike motor vehicle trip generation,there are not established methods for estimating bicycle and pedestrian trip generation. Rates of walking and bicycling vary throughout the U.S.and even within the same metro area. For that reason,it is not possible to make clear forecasts of pedestrian and bicycle trip generation. Specific land uses cannot be considered in isolation.There are number of factors that influence rates of pedestrian and bicycle trip generation, including: • Residential proximity to retail/office land uses:Walking and bicycle use are typically higher in mixed-use areas or areas where residential land uses are in close proximity to retail/office land use. Retail, office,and recreational land uses tend to attract the most bicycle and pedestrian trips. • Residential density: Areas with higher density residential land use tend to see more walking and bicycling than lower density areas. • Scale of land use and building design: People tend to prefer to walk and bike in areas where the land use and building design are at a pedestrian scale, including smaller building footprint,active uses on ground floors,visually interesting buildings,and concealed parking. • Road network: Small block sizes and narrow streets are associated with more pedestrian and bicycle activity. In areas with large blocks and large-scale development,people often have to walk or bike out of their way to reach their destination.Wide streets tend to be difficult for people to cross on foot or bike. • Pedestrian and bicycle network: People tend to walk and bicycle more in areas with continuous and comfortable pedestrian and bicycle facilities.Areas with higher quality facilities (wide sidewalks with separation from the roadway and/or physically separated bicycle facilities) often see more pedestrian and bicycle use. • Transit network: People tend to walk and bike more in areas with frequent public transit service. • Ease or difficulty of vehicle use in an area:Areas with traffic congestion,lack of parking,and/or parking fees tend to generate more bicycle and pedestrian trips as vehicle trips can be more costly or frustrating. There are certainly other factors that influence rates of walking and bicycling in an area. Weather,personal preference,access to a personal vehicle (or lack thereof),income, physical ability,and other factors influence whether people walk or bike to a destination. However,the factors listed above are those that a city has the strongest potential to influence.With this information in mind,the sections below identify assumed pedestrian and bicycle generators based on current and future land uses. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 (463 PAGE 26 Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Trip Generators Commercial retail and office development has been in place for a long time in the Southdale area. However,there is limited bicycling and walking in the area due to auto-oriented development,large block sizes,wide roadways with high traffic volumes,gaps in pedestrian and bicycle network, and separation between commercial and residential land uses.The sections below describe different types of pedestrian and bicycle trip generators in the study area. Many of these destinations may not attract significant bicycle and pedestrian traffic today; however,they have the potential to be generators as residential density increases and new pedestrian/bicycle infrastructure is constructed. Office Land Uses:Within suburban contexts,office land uses are less of a pedestrian generator than other commercial land uses. Most people do not live within walking distance of their workplace,medical provider, or other professional services. Office land uses tend to attract some bicycle trips due to people bicycling to work. Office land uses are situated in the following-locations: • Medical offices north of W. 66th Street(Fairview Southdale Hospital, Southdale Medical Center,Twin Cities Orthopedics,and others) • Offices north of W. 66th Street between France and York Avenues • Offices along the west side of France Avenue • Offices located along W. 77th Street • Centennial Lakes office buildings It is assumed that offices located in the study area do not attract significant pedestrian traffic at this time. However,this could change as additional high density housing units are constructed in the study area. It is possible some people will move to the area to be close to their workplace. It is also assumed that there are low rates of bicycle transportation to offices in the study area,mostly due to lack of bicycle infrastructure in the study area and surrounding neighborhoods. Retail Land Uses: Retail land uses tend to attract more pedestrians and bicyclists than other land uses,provided that housing is located within close proximity to retail land uses. People tend to visit retailers close to their home or workplace,unless they have needs for specialty goods or are visiting destination retail areas.The Southdale area is a regional retail destination. It is expected that most people drive to Southdale retail if they live outside of the study area; however,some people shopping in the area prefer to walk between retail destinations once they reach the Southdale area.The diversity of retail land uses in the study area mean that most nearby residents should be able to meet their retail needs within the study area. Retail pedestrian/bicycle generators include the following: • Southdale Center • Galleria • Southdale Square (York Avenue and W. 66th Street) • Retail uses along France Avenue • Retail uses along York Avenue • Retail uses along Hazelton Street • Limited retail/banks north of W. 66th Street SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 IthCq PAGE 27 As with office land uses, it is assumed that retail in the study area does not currently attract significant pedestrian and bicycle traffic. However,existing retail will likely draw additional pedestrian and bicycle traffic as residential density increases. Hotel Land Uses:There is currently one hotel in the study area.The Westin Edina Galleria is located at York Avenue and W. 69th Street,in close proximity to both the Galleria and Southdale Center. It is expected that the hotel generates more pedestrian traffic than other land uses,given its close proximity to retail and restaurants in the area. Hotel guests are more likely to walk to their destinations as some might not have access to a vehicle during their stay.The Westin is unlikely to be a significant bicycle trip generator as most guests do not have access to bicycles during their stay; however,there may be some bicycle use among employees of the hotel. Transportation Land Uses:The Southdale Transit Center is located on the east side of Southdale Center,near York Avenue. It serves several local and express buses.The transit center is expected to be a more significant pedestrian and bicycle trip generator,as most people access transit by walking and bicycling. Recreational, Worship,and Institutional Land Use:There are several recreational, worship,and institutional land uses within the study area. Several of these are expected to generate more bicycle and pedestrian trips than other destinations in the study area, particularly parks and schools.These destinations include: • Lake Cornelia/Edina Aquatic Center • Arneson Acres Park • Lake Edina Park • Centennial Lakes • Edina Art Center • Southdale YMCA • Southdale Library and County Service Center • Cornelia Elementary School • Christ Presbyterian Church-W. 70th Street and TH 100 Residential Land Uses: Residential land uses are currently located along the edges of the study area. Single family residential is generally located west of Valley View Road/France Avenue and east of Xerxes Avenue. High density residential (apartments,condos,and townhomes) are located north of W. 66th Street,west of France Avenue,south of Hazelton Road,and along both sides of York Avenue south of Hazelton Road. It is expected that high density housing generates a greater share of pedestrian and bicycle trips in the area.This is assumed in part because high density housing is located closer to retail, office,and transit than single family residential areas.Single family residential land uses are likely to generate more pedestrian and bicycle trips to the recreational and school land uses in the study area,as those destinations are located closer to single family residential. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 4-11c PAGE 28 New high density housing has been constructed at York Avenue and W. 69th Street(One Southdale Place). It is assumed that this housing generates more pedestrian trips than other residential land uses in the study area,given its close proximity to retail and restaurant destinations in Southdale Center,the Galleria,and along the east side of York Avenue. Potential Future Pedestrian and Bicycle Trip Generators Pedestrian and bicycle use is expected to grow in conjunction with anticipated development in the Southdale area.As part of the city's land use plan,the city is considering an increased density scenario that would plan for 100-150 units per acre within the area bounded by TH 62,Xerxes Avenue, France Avenue,and W. 77th Street.This area is dominated by retail and office land uses at this time.As residential density grows in this area,there will be more people living within a short walk or bike ride of retail and office destinations.As a result,it is assumed that more people will walk and bicycle for transportation.The increased density scenario is already coming to fruition. The sections below describe private development that is planned within the study area and expected to be constructed over the next one to two years. New development in is also an opportunity to influence walking and bicycling behavior in the area. Given the proximity of new residential to commercial land uses,there is a lot of potential for pedestrian and bicycle transportation.The city can work with developers to integrate new or enhanced walking and bicycling routes into or adjacent to developments. The city can also encourage pedestrian-scale development including as active uses on ground floors,windows,and entrances that are oriented towards the sidewalk(rather than towards parking). Residential development:Within the study area,over 1,400 units of high density residential housing are in some stage of the development process.These developments are generally located much closer to existing commercial development and are therefore expected to generate more pedestrian and bicycle trips as compared to existing residential land uses. Planned residential developments include: • Gateway Pointe (York Avenue and W. 66th Street) - 210 apartment units • 6725 York(Wicks site) -242 apartment units • 7200 France- 160 apartment units • Aurora on France (6500 France) - 188 senior/transitional housing units • Byerly's/Think Bank development- 234 units • Continental Gardens (York Avenue) -100 senior housing units • Titus/Eberhardt development(W. 66th Street and Xerxes Avenue) - 275 units • Beacon Housing- 39 units for homeless young adults Retail/restaurant development:At this time,there is less commercial development planned than residential development. Several of the residential developments listed above will be mixed-use and will include restaurant and/or retail spaces. The only stand-alone commercial development planned at this time is the Bank of America redevelopment at France Avenue and W. 69th Street. New commercial development is expected to attract pedestrian and bicycle traffic. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 /1 l GG PAGE 29 In addition,the existing commercial land uses are expected to generate additional pedestrian and bicycle trips as residential development occurs in close proximity to existing retail and restaurant land uses. It is also possible that residents of the new units (particularly apartment units,as people renting typically have more flexibility in housing location than people who own their homes) will move to the area to be closer to jobs in area retail and restaurants.These residents will be more likely to walk and bike to their work due to the close proximity. Hotel development:The Southdale Hotel is currently in the development process,to be constructed at the southwest corner of York Avenue and W. 66th Street.Given the hotel's proximity to Southdale Center and Southdale Square,it is expected that this development would generate pedestrian trips.As discussed above,the hotel is unlikely to be a strong generator of bicycle trips. Office/medical development: Fairview Southdale is expanding its Emergency Room. Southdale Medical Center is also pursuing an expansion. It is unlikely that these developments would have an impact on pedestrian and bicycle trip generation in the area. Pedestrian and Bicycle Analysis Conclusion Currently,the greatest pedestrian and bicycle trip generators in the area are the commercial areas located in the core of the study area (bounded by W. 66th Street,York Avenue, Hazelton Road,and France Avenue),the Southdale Transit Center,and existing high density housing. However,pedestrian and bicycle use in the area is currently low due for several reasons. Current development patterns are auto-oriented,with parking fronting the street in most cases and large block sizes that add travel time for people walking and bicycling. Transportation infrastructure is also a barrier,as there are wide roadways and intersections with fast-moving vehicles,gaps in the pedestrian network,and a lack of bicycle facilities.Additionally,most residential land use is separated from commercial land uses,which means that people need to cover greater distances if they wish to walk or bike from their home to retail/office destinations. Increased residential density in the study area is expected to increase pedestrian and bicycle trips.The greatest future generators are the planned residential development in the core of the study area.As the study area shifts to a mixed-use development pattern,the shorter distances between residential and commercial land uses will make it easier for residents to walk and bike for transportation within the study area. It is expected that future residential and existing retail land uses will generate more pedestrian and bicycle trips than today. Hotel development will also generate additional pedestrian and bicycle trips. The Southdale Working Group is continuing to develop a framework plan for the area based on a set of"Working Principles and Supporting Questions". One of the principals identified with Phase 1 was "Foster a logical, safe,inviting and expansive public realm facilitating movement of people within and to the district"the identified attribute developed in Phase 2 for this principal is "Improved and new pedestrian connections,new street grid". SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 41•j( 1 PAGE 30 Figure 16 Existing Pedestrian and Bi c1e Generators ,i.v. _.....:, „..,,i r; .: -""*"..V: : ma k ., ': t. ,;.,,,,64,4,,,,,,,,, ,„;„.1,,,,„1„44.,,,,,,.,41, ...4,,,.:i.,.„...,,,,.,, _IL g �A.x. $; #- y'^+ + . ' .:,,,,,.:::,,,,,,,,T , �` s' i,. K, 15. p . r gym` + ° < " � I,,4 C yet k S r {4� — f:fillf � /j((�ji j." k + �j�l�J. i twn':F lit : # i +, t •4 {{'Xr ,. : '.... . 0,,,,,,.',:.•--,,-; '.----!.., ---` 'z i ,,,",cT4 •"," - - --—' ,,---) i " - ' L' ,... ''' ' ''' :ii":?'4., s ....,,,. .. T.,,,_„, ,l 44, ik, Ali ;<::4;;;;i: 1 ..". MI ":"', i } A. rt : 141, ...4.-":!:,'„:1'' "°a , �»L r 4 t%' `�.. , • tk it _ ! , 1 a yeLI'L*...r-.,:j A t .,,,,g. am. 7'-.4"t4'.';',.-,� JY .,*� t: "``'�g " ; " , � �,"� .,..+ "$ � X - 4 [[[.tea �" wlMllll!{.• �� � j �C �,f� 4 �i .:1C`*. Y' Air " ,. �..r � § � '" 3• ^ alter 4.,,,rr. r 1.tlird. , ', lal"..,...,..' ,77,:•., _ ^ ,i,iiiik,. , , .! , , , . , 1 `' ,,.». v✓<. ;,r,•as 71!' ms ,c, • _. t' , � s = ',#. 1,1 K ....,... -. J' I "--r.r---- T ., : ,. . . . .,, , . . . „. , , . , ,. ...... ,r-,-- 1 _ .,, . 7„..,... .y wt t7F 1M # ^ t.. , „?-. ...0-,i, VN�n47 ,.„,, f., _,....L.,,. fir a1...,jN..--+� —del. 'QtCXn,4•Mii! TrAraLMS1�r _. < '1. n _ -- --' - as SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 (+illPAGE 31 Fi a re 17-Future Pedestrian and Bic cle Generators { ^: yii •yS is „ �,,m..,_ z 55 ay ,4# #. . . *I ' . v ,.'' • 1-.1.*,,,,' -P.r. ‘.., tt. , .1,1 t.:61 4 44 N Ink lit SIyI ry .. 7 T,, ,, `",,,- .?. *� d +:TAY•) NtaaM . ? '+ .. -s 'T/qa�h n''`N. N,,.. s.,+; .. ., * f .T�?‘ ,. 151 1"'9 fry $ I' 4 # SILL e �.rt.bl1 9;4 t1 41 i fit:. a, a # a+ "` 4 ,l-.- % CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the analysis and modeling for both the 2040 base scenario and 2040 high density scenario,issues with some intersections and/or movements will exist if improvements are not made to the transportation system. As development is proposed in the Southdale Area detailed analysis of adjacent intersections should be conducted to document the need for specific improvements at the critical intersections. These intersections at a minimum would include: 2040 Base Conditions Scenario 2040 High Density Scenario 1. France Avenue at TH 62 Ramps 1. France Avenue at TH 62 Ramps 2. France Avenue at W. 65th Street 2. France Avenue at W. 65th Street 3. France Avenue at W. 66th Street 3. France Avenue at W. 66th Street 4. France Avenue at W. 69th Street 4. France Avenue at W. 69th Street 5. France Avenue at W. 70th Street 5. France Avenue at W. 70th Street 6. France Avenue at W. 76th Street 6. France Avenue at Hazelton Road 7. France Avenue at Minnesota Drive 7. France Avenue at Gallagher Drive 8. York Avenue at W. 69th Street 8. France Avenue at Parklawn Ave 9. York Avenue at Parklawn Avenue 9. France Avenue at W. 76th Street 10.York Avenue at W. 78th Street 10.France Avenue at Minnesota Drive 11.Hazelton Road at Target Access 11.Xerxes Ave at TH 62 North Ramp 12.Minnesota Dr at Edinborough Way 12.York Avenue at W. 69th Street 13.York Avenue at Hazelton Road 14.York Avenue at Parklawn Avenue 15.York Avenue at W. 78th Street 16.Valley View Road at W. 69th Street 17.Hazelton Road at Target Access 18.Edinborough Way at W. 76th Street 19.Minnesota Dr at Edinborough Way 20.Minnesota Drive at W. 77th Street Most of the traffic issues documented in this Study can be addressed by relatively low-cost improvements such as: • Signal Timing; • Improvements to turn lanes geometry,or: • Installation of traffic signals or roundabouts at stop controlled intersections; With the current proposed development and possible increased development scenario,in the future more trips are expected by all modes of transportation. If a greater proportion of these trips are walking,bicycling,and/or transit trips, it will reduce the pressure on the roadway system.The study area has potential to be a place where residents can meet many of their transportation needs by walking,bicycling,and using transit.Below are general recommendations that the City could pursue to encourage walking and bicycling in the Southdale area: SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 �, (� PAGE 33 1. Enhance and expand the pedestrian and bicycle network in the study area: o Develop a dense web of pedestrian connections so people can access destinations more directly(rather than walking out of their way to follow existing pedestrian connections) o Identify, enhance, and develop key pedestrian and bicycle routes between residential and commercial land uses o Plan and implement a low-stress bicycle network to expand upon the successful Edina Promenade o Address challenging pedestrian and bicycle crossings within the study area: work to shorten crossing distances,remove free-right turns,and improve key pedestrian crossings at currently un-signalized locations o Improve and/or develop pedestrian timing plans in coordination with vehicle signal timing plans 2. Balance the needs of different transportation modes: Improved signal timing,adding turn lanes or widening roadways may improve conditions for people driving,but will make crossings more challenging for people walking and bicycling. It will be important to consider impacts to people walking and bicycling as the city considers improvements to the roadway system. 3. Work with residential and commercial developers to improve bicycle and pedestrian conditions in the study area: o Integrate new or enhanced walking and bicycling facilities into or adjacent to development o Develop building designs and site plans that are pedestrian scale: including active uses on ground floors and entrances oriented towards the sidewalk 4. Work with owners of existing large commercial properties (for example,Southdale Center and the Galleria) to develop pedestrian and bicycle routes through their development. 5. Coordinate with"Southdale Working Group"to implement the identified Working Principals and associated Attributes. SOUTHDALE AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY 07/22/2016 CITY OF EDINA WSB PROJECT NO. 1686-670 qQ I U ' PAGE 34 214 STAFF REPORT (---_, ..-1-4A, 4 2 )141t '' :;6.4,, 12 4/61 a,, ,..5) •IkCORPORATI9• 1888 Date: September 27, 2017 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment& Rezoning—4404 & 4416 Valley View Road, and 6108, 6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue Information / Background: Edina Flats LLC is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, & Rezoning to build 18 units of owner occupied housing at 4404 & 4416 Valley View Road, and 6108, 6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue. (See site locations on pages Al-A6.) The Comprehensive Plan Amendment is required to expand the Neighborhood Commercial District to include 6108, 6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue. The Rezoning is from R-1, PCD-4 and APD to PCD- I, Planned Commercial Development. (See applicant narrative and plans on pages A26-A45.) The purpose of the request is to re-develop the city owned property at 4416 Valley View Road (the vacant property on the corner of Kellogg), the row of parking for the commercial development to the west, the vacant parcel at 6120 Kellogg and the three single-family home parcels at 6116, 6112 and 6108 Kellogg. (See page A I a.) This portion of the development would include a 3-story condo building with six units on the corner, and three 2-story condo/townhome buildings to the north. (See page A32.) Additionally, the property at 4404 Valley View Road would be re-developed with a four- unit, two story condo building. The existing structure would be removed. (See page A32.) The property is 1.27 acres in size. The density proposed in the project would be 14 units per acre. (18 units total.) This site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as NN, Neighborhood Node, which allows up to 30 units per acre in this area. (See language from the Comprehensive Plan/Small Area Plan on pages A7-A20.) The proposal is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan/Small Area Plan in terms of height and density proposed; however, the proposal does require an amendment to re- guide and re-zone the single family homes to NN, Neighborhood Node and PCD-I, Planned City of Edina • 4801W.50th St. • Edina,MN 55424 STAFF REPORT Page 2 Commercial District. (See page A.) The multi-family residential units would be a conditionally permitted use within the existing PCD-1, Planned Commercial District Zoning District. Variances would be required for the setbacks that are proposed, and the height of the 2-story buildings. The applicant and the property owner to the west, Noonan Properties, did go through a sketch plan review for the proposed project. (See sketch plans on pages A21-A25) The following changes were made to address issues raised during the sketch plan reviews: Reduced the height from 3 stories to 2 stories adjacent to single-family homes. r Increased the setback and green space along Valley View Road, Oaklawn and Kellogg. Increased the setbacks on Oaklawn and Kellogg to better fit the neighborhood. Enhanced the architecture. Enhanced the pedestrian experience. i- Enhanced Landscaping. Eliminated the Commercial building on the Kellogg intersection. Noonan Properties would sell the applicant their land if this project is approved by the City Council. To accommodate the request the following is required: i A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to expand the NN, Neighborhood Node District to include 6108, 61 12, 61 16 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue; A Rezoning from R-1, PCD-4 and APD to PCD-1, Planned Commercial Development, Preliminary Development Plan with Variances; and Conditional Use Permit to allow multi-family residential use. SOUTHDALE AREA DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES The Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant; and they have responded. (See Pages A28a-A28h.) The site size is limiting in regard to creating significant public spaces; however the applicant is providing opportunities to move pedestrians through the project by the boulevard style sidewalks. Small public spaces are proposed on the corners of Valley View and Kellogg and Oaklawn. (See page A32.) STAFF REPORT Page 3 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Single-family homes; zoned R-I, Single Dwelling Unit District and guided low density residential. Easterly: Single-family homes and a commercial building; zoned PCD-I, Planned Commercial District and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. Southerly: New Horizon Day Care; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District; and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. Westerly: Commercial mixed use building; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District and guided NN, Neighborhood Node Existing Site Features The subject properties total 1.27 acres in size, and include a vacant lot, a parking lot, single family homes and a commercial building. (See page A I a.) Planning Guide Plan designation: NN, Neighborhood Node and LD, Low Density Residential Zoning: R-I, Single-Dwelling Unit District, PCD-I, Planned Commercial District, PCD-4, Planned Commercial District and APD, Automobile Parking District. Parking Each unit would have two enclosed parking spaces. Limited parking space would be available in front of the garages, and on the street. The commercial property to the west would still maintain enough parking spaces, despite the loss of parking. Based on the square footage of the commercial/office building 71 parking stalls are required; the resulting site would contain 82 stalls. Site Circulation Access to all of the housing units would be off of Valley View Road, and not on the local residential streets, Oaklawn and Kellogg. (See page A32.) Underground parking would be provided below the 6 and 4 unit buildings on Valley View Road. The proposal includes boulevard style sidewalks along Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue. (See page A32.) Staff recommends adding a sidewalk on Oaklawn Avenue. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site 34 over-story trees would be required. Currently, there are only a few trees on the site, and very little landscaping. The applicant is proposing 45 over-story trees around the perimeter of the site. A full complement of under-story shrubs and bushes (226) are also proposed. (See landscape plan on pages A42-A45.) STAFF REPORT Page 4 Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A46-A47. A developer's agreement would be required for the construction of the proposed sidewalks within the right-of-way. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts, as they are the City's review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a variety combination of stone, stucco, composite siding and glass. (See renderings on pages A29-A3 I.) The applicant will have a materials board for the Planning Commission to review at the Planning Commission meeting. Height The proposed height is 3 and 2-two stories tall consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (See pages A29-A3 I.) Height of the two story buildings would be 30 feet to the top of the gable, 24- 5 feet to the mid-point of the roof. The three-story building would be 36 feet tall. Variances are required, but the proposed heights are generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the city and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Article V of this Chapter: (I) It is the policy of the city to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the city. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the city's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. STAFF REPORT Page 5 (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The applicant would be installing boulevard sidewalks along Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue to provide a more safe and comfortable walking experience. (See page A32.) Conditional Use Permit Per Section 36-305, the City Council shall not grant a Conditional Use Permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements; The existing utilities are adequate to serve the proposed use. A traffic study was done by Wenck Associates, which concludes that the existing roadways can support the proposed development. (See the traffic study on pages A48—A69.) 2. Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; As mentioned, Wenck conducted a traffic study to determine the impact of the proposed development on the existing roadways. As demonstrated on page A66 of the study, the level of service on the adjacent roadways and intersections would remain the same. 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare; This site is located in the NN, Neighborhood Node, which is described in the Comprehensive Plan as a small to moderate-scale commercial residential or mixed use area. The proposed residential development is moderate in scale at a density of 14 units an acre. The NN allows up to 30 units per acre. The proposal provides a "graceful transition" with a two-story residential building closest to the single-family homes to the north and east. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; STAFF REPORT Page 6 The development fits in well on the site. It would be located within an under-utilized parking lot, the vacant city property, and a run-down vacant house. The sizes of the proposed buildings are generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 5. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and With the exception of the variances that are requested, the plans meet all city code provisions and are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As a conditionally permitted use within the PCD-I District, which is primarily a commercial retail zoning district; a residential use should be integrated into the development where it is located. As proposed, the applicant is proposing to add pedestrian walkways along Kellogg and Valley View to provide connections to the retail uses to the west. These will also provide connections from the existing single-family neighborhood to the north and east. 6. Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned previously, the proposed use and density of the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. This site is located in the NN, Neighborhood Node, which is described in the Comprehensive Plan as a small to moderate-scale commercial residential or mixed use area. The proposed residential development is moderate in scale at a density of 14 units an acre. The NN allows up to 30 units per acre. The proposal provides a "graceful transition" with a two- story residential building closest to the single-family homes to the north and east. The height of the 2-story units would be 30 feet to the roof line; consistent with the maximum height allowed in the R-I District. Compliance Table As demonstrated on the following table, the proposed development would require variances for height and building setbacks. City Standard Proposed (PCD-1) Front— Kellogg Avenue 35 feet 9 feet* Front—Valley View Road 35 feet 23 & 5 feet* Front—Oaklawn Avenue 35 feet 16 feet* Side 25 feet 6 & 5 feet* Building Height 2-stories or 2-3 stories & 30-36 feet** 24 feet Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 .63 Density 30 units per acre (19 units) 14 Parking 1.5 stalls/ unit- 1,500 s.f.+ (14)=21 36 1 stall/unit under- 1,500 s.f. (4)=4 25 required *Variance required STAFF REPORT Page 7 ** Variance required but story maximum is consistent with the VV/Wooddale Small Area Plan City Code now measures height to the roof line. Variance — Building Setbacks & Height Per the compliance table above, variances are requested for the building setbacks and height. The PCD zoning district however, encourages buildings to be brought up to the street to create a pedestrian friendly environment, which is what the proposed project is attempting to accomplish. Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the Ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: I) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setback; however that would result in parking and drive aisles in front of the buildings. Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance suggests that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment. The applicant is proposing sidewalks along Valley View and Wooddale. Staff recommends a sidewalk on Oaklawn as well. These sidewalks would provide an active pedestrian and streetscape environment, which would provide opportunity for residents to the north and east to move through the development to connect to the commercial development to the west. (See page A32.) The depth of the lots and the triangular shape of the corner lots create the practical difficulty in developing these properties with multifamily residential or commercial uses, without having the parking areas in front of the buildings. The proposed parking area and garages face the commercial district to the west and not the single-family homes to the east. The way building height is measured was changed in 2014. The City Code requires building height to be measured to the roof line (top of the roof). When the 2008 Comprehensive Plan established the current 2-story and 24-foot height limitation, the measurement was to the mid-point of a pitched roof. The definition of building height now measures height to the top of the ridge-line. The height limitation of 24 feet is not reasonable given the way the City now measures height. The mid-point of the proposed two story buildings are 24-5 feet, STAFF REPORT Page 8 however the ridge line is 30 feet. The proposed height is consistent with the maximum height of a single-family home which was the intent of the 24-foot limit. Staff would recommend that the small area plan be revised to allow two-stories and 30 feet based on the way building height is now measured. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes. The site is unique in the PCD-I zoning district, given the lot depths and triangular shape at the corners. These conditions were not created by the applicant. The City encourages buildings to be brought up to the street, rather than having large parking lots in front of the building from the adjacent streets. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed buildings have been designed to fit the neighborhood and are consistent with the Valley View/Wooddale small area plan. The pitched roof buildings have been designed to blend in with the single-family homes to the north and east. The proposed development would add to the neighborhood and create some vibrancy at a currently predominantly vacant area. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment To accommodate the request, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested to expand the NN, Neighborhood Node District to 6108, 6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue. The NN, Neighborhood Node allows up to 30 units per acre. The proposed density of 14 units per acre is well under the maximum allowed. The map on the following page shows how the Comprehensive Plan/Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan would be amended to accommodate the change in designation. STAFF REPORT Page 9 I ft 40o.cv,0 i I a t pa r 2 ! / 1 0I ''''ir X36 rn,,) c. yria 1 i i 7 If - ,, - l M ■ �\\,Y I I c ia■ Or r 3 I .. I T I I /r o 2 ` ' — ;;yam-. ! u '. ,,,f I t - I *. ,, I o 1 ®ice r-4-4 M ■ I t IY _ I 4 L ow I c I NN 2nd g e W W i,I nd Neighborhood Node Boundary j ow iv III no Ik , 1 ► 4 f"" Garrison Lane L�1 [ I P' ` IIK "" a RE I x. z NN, Neighborhood Node (2 stories & 30 feet) PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to expand the boundary reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: I. The proposed density is low. The density of the project is half of what would be allowed in the NN, Neighborhood Node district. The four single-family home lots are being replaced with three, three unit buildings. 2. The units would be two-stories at 30 feet tall in height to match the maximum height allowed in the R-I, Single-family neighborhood to the north and east. The small area plan suggests graceful transitions to the single family homes. (See pages A I 0-A I I.) By designing the homes to be two stories with pitched roofs and all the parking in back facing the commercial area, the applicant has created a graceful transition. 3. Additional density would support the retail uses in the district. STAFF REPORT Page 10 4. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan: a. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) • A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. h. Height Limits Near the Center of the Neighborhood Node. North of Valley View Road, building heights may be up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet. South of Valley View Road building heights may be up to four stories, not to exceed 48 feet. STAFF REPORT Page I I i. Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful transitions to single family areas are important (as specified on the Building Height Limits Plan), the height of new buildings may be up to two stories. j. Establish universally accessible sidewalks along all edges of all spaces. k. Plant trees along the edges of all streets and spaces to provide shade and protection for pedestrians moving next to and in and out of buildings. I. Gentle Transition from Node to Neighborhood. Whether the site is used for commercial or residential development, landscaping, screening and building height should be designed to help the building serve as an end cap for the residential block next to Valley View Road. The building height limit in this location is two stories. m. Encourage Underground Parking. Residents' parking should be located under the buildings to the extent allowed by market conditions. n. Commercial parking should be behind or along-side the buildings and be visually buffered by plantings so as to encourage an active streetscape. • Is the Rezoning to PCD-I reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the proposed Rezoning is reasonable for the following reasons: I. Zoning would be consistent with adjacent Zoning. The PCD-I Zoning would be consistent over the majority of the NN, Neighborhood Node District. (See Zoning Map on page A6.) 2. The existing roadways would support the project. Wenck conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that the existing traffic generated from the project would be supported by the existing roads. (See page A66 of the traffic study.) • Are the Variances justified? Yes, staff believes the variances are justified for the following reasons: I. The building could be located on the site to meet the required setback; however that would result in parking and drive aisles in front of the buildings. Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance suggests that the City Council will consider exceptions to the setback requirements if the use creates an active pedestrian and streetscape environment; which is proposed. 2. As demonstrated on pages 7-8 of this report, the proposal meets the variance criteria. 3. The building heights of the two-story buildings are consistent with the maximum height of single-family residential home. The way building height is measured was recently changed. STAFF REPORT Page 12 The definition of building height is now to the top of the ridge-line. The suggested height limitation of 24 feet was based on measuring height to the mid-point of a pitched roof, when the Comprehensive Plan established the two-story & 24-foot height limitation. The mid-point of the proposed two story buildings are 24 feet, however the ridge line is 30 feet. The proposed height is consistent with the maximum height of a single-family home which was the intent of the 24-foot limit. Staff would recommend that the small area plan be revised to allow two-stories and 30 feet based on the way building height is now measured. The plans could be revised to have flat roofs, however, that would not be consistent with a single-family home neighborhood. Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: The NN, Neighborhood Node is expanded to include 6108, 61 12, 61 16 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue. The height maximum for a two-story structure is increased to 30 feet to the ridge line. Approval is subject to the following findings: I. The density of the project is half of what would be allowed in the NN, Neighborhood Node district. The four single-family home lots are being replaced with three, three unit buildings. 2. The units would be two-stories and 30 feet tall in height to match the maximum height allowed in the R-I, Single-family neighborhood to the north and east. 3. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and Valley View Wooddale Small Area Plan: a. Movement Patterns. • Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. • Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) • A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under "Issues" will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. STAFF REPORT Page 13 c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings "step down" at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories "step back" from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. v. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. vi. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. vii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front facade. viii.Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. h. Height limits near the center of the Neighborhood Node. North of Valley View Road, building heights may be up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet. South of Valley View Road building heights may be up to four stories, not to exceed 48 feet. i. Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful transitions to single family areas are important (as specified on the Building Height Limits Plan), the height of new buildings may be up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet. j. Establish universally accessible sidewalks along all edges of all spaces. k. Plant trees along the edges of all streets and spaces to provide shade and protection for pedestrians moving next to and in and out of buildings. I. Gentle Transition from Node to Neighborhood. Whether the site is used for commercial or residential development, landscaping, screening and building height should be designed to help the building serve as an end cap for the residential block next to Valley View Road. The building height limit in this location is two stories. STAFF REPORT Page 14 m. Encourage Underground Parking. Residents' parking should be located under the buildings to the extent allowed by market conditions. n. Commercial parking should be behind or along-side the buildings and be visually buffered by plantings so as to encourage an active streetscape. Preliminary Rezoning to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District & Preliminary Development with a Conditional Use Permit and Variances Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from R-I, PCD-4 and APD to PCD-I, Planned Commercial Development, Preliminary Development Plan and a Conditional Use Permit with Variances at 4404 & 4416 Valley View Road, and 6108, 6112, 6116 and 6120 Kellogg Avenue. The Variances are as follows: 1. Building height from 2 stories and 24 feet to 2 stories and 30 feet, and 3 stories and 36 feet on the corner of Valley View and Wooddale. 2. Front setback on Kellogg from 35 feet to 9 feet. 3. Front setback on Valley View Road from 35 feet to 23 & 5 feet. 4. Side setback on Oaklawn from 25 feet to 6 and 5 feet. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. Zoning would be consistent with the predominant Zoning District (PCD-I) in this area. The PCD-I Zoning would be consistent over the majority of the NN, Neighborhood Node District. 2. The existing roadways would support the project. Wenck conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that the existing traffic generated from the project would be supported by the existing roads. 3. The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The proposal meets the Conditional Use Permit Standards of Chapter 36. 5. The findings for the height and setback variances are met. The practical difficulty is the unique shape of the lot and lack of lot depth. Meeting the setback requirements would result in the parking and garages to be located in the front of the buildings. 6. With the exception of the NN area expansion, the project is consistent with the Valley View and Wooddale Small Area Plan. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: I. The Final Development Plans must be consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated August 25, 2017, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. STAFF REPORT Page I5 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated September 20, 2017; including a Developer's Agreement or Site Improvement Performance Agreement, vacation of existing easements if needed, construction of a boulevard style sidewalk on Oaklawn to connect to the Valley View Road sidewalk. 4. Variances and Conditional Use Permit are subject to Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan approval by City Council. 5. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Final Rezoning is contingent on the Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Deadline for a city decision: December I 9, 2017 Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 1/17/2017 ti, 6005 6004; 6005'6004 E:05 6004 60i_'9 24 6009 60086009 600£: 6009''6008 c0�17 6013 6013 6012 6013'6012 • 24 all 6017 • 6017 6017'6016. 6021 Cil1E' 6020 4303 6020 F036 60 37 6025 6025 6025•6024 E041 61344 6045; r;C+2'. (I I',t SI r,r:1 1,e r--1 24 450;; 24 6109 !m U 61013 5100 r c' 6117 6105 6101 , 4420 •-� : 6120 . 6104 ,., '; `i . 6121 2 4 6109 .' 6105; r 6128 .1;', 6113 61r�8 % 6109• 24 4545 ; 6117 6112 6113 6136;, 6121 6116 a 6117 24 4425 MIE 6201 6)00'''`' 6216 24 4.115 4213; 6205. 6205 6204 6209 24 4401 6208 6213 4301 6220 4246 6212 6217 ' y 4420 _t 24 6�24'a. 4240 (j rn �n Lane7 6301 ; ., 6228 i' 6213 4237 4236 63015 4%0 o 24 €240 16.25 6304 61[x9' 2.-;-:4443 P' 6237 • 4229 4228 6301 6308 4509 4421 6244 , 6241 6313 24 �.�nn 4225 630 5'x'-312 _____ 6317 6309,6316 '6321 1 inch =400 feet No results Comments: Site Location This data(i)is furnished AS IS'with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 <,* a t Vis. 160214* r6020, Tg021•, .' 6,020. . 601 ,6013 \ 6012 ' Vor „.", 025°" 6024, X6025 — 6024 " 6016 _ _ 17799.--war- �" . /**i,,..4,, , .601 7 6016 60281.67127t 6028 40 L 1 a � ; _ .. ' 6032 -.f 60 33 4 00 2 �t F * ' 1. 6020w X6020 s ` ' 6021 � , _ 36037*'" ,6036 6 , . `` ... _ i. ._ 6 * .' 6036 603 _" - 6024 604 6,G040 •(603 ,,,4 1- d '' � ., 6025 « . .- ;"'.�" . psi 4 4 ' ._. �— .,,,""'. 6044 6� 045 '' ,..‘,,,, a *6045 w 604441 t 6029` 602 �, , 4. m _R ° POW, ' D1 '. 00 . - h 16101 , 6100X6101 .6100 ,. 1� ° 1 6104 1G105 1— 61.0 'r c : _ 6104'. .., � r 3 4510 , 61'09 ;.—;- '4518 lk , .� et � •,k `-ti ,� 61081 . t 10940- 6108 6108 ,�, - -- ' row if► 4, ri.-% _' _ i,„ '{ ! 62 . #� f'�3 61,2 `6113 _^ x-61*12 r 4500 t ��6�1�1w6 =6117 � 6116 � F�. 16111„,„„„,....k, � � r t ''''''' .. -_ „t -`17, ....:.. , ►6;1;2©' , 9, 4426' rte" r c- r-� *,- ,. 6120 6121 '-6120 ,6121 ' r -+t i ' � '�� - � "� 6125� 6 �` 612i. ��"� �, I w 6 4416 ,..1...., 6129' 6128 ',46[1'29 ' ''L ‘ . , i 4545 • ,,,......-4......- "'.a t l'— ;'.� ',,. i*s4416 1135 6132 .. —X6 33 . . ,4111111P4 . ° +x�v ' , P ` 6136 �G 137" I*6136.,. 1 IV 6161 :_ .,. 6141��� 4404 ......,.,,r '" 1, ." "4425 g 145 '6144+ 4 d v w I Ptd" z 'Ns*.• r111 r 0 621 (5 • 415` _. a #. ;* , tit t:- :, 430,1 205 "*Ir 16 : .44 .456,8 4508 4504 #4500 ,.62010,4444►44 0 ti. '44:M'r i. ir 4301 "h alk . , 4436 4520 *.,.t '451'1, , '?,oe �. .4` '1k ,►� �" 1 6220 { ,, '�" i z 4 1� 2s1'420! a-2 r--+� .„ + �R. :> t; , . . ,w "'�4443 - ':4439` .a.." 4 2,2440 t.. . 4' 509117505'14-5-.°1 , "k` „,:z,,:.:4435-#4'1"--431A,,........1\-�” "r pri ,,�o ""'�4513 ' " 1 `" `'rle S U A` ?& 7dina. Hennepin,.MetroGlS ®,�+�="4 Associate' 2013'•1�r`''{ pial 20) I in= 188ft Addresses 4,0 `r :c %/ The CITY of . EDINA Al W " E S September 20 Map Powered by DataLink -^&-.,''T.‘'<.'4...f.,'C.''..:',:'.''''':'':'.: i:"''...''.‘,.'.4.'.V;'‘..e'll'''..Z'''''''' ''.IA..41. :, .'":!,. •...\ ,':, 1• .. ' ' L.L.1..'1 d` rill t�r+ { s'7. . - t,-..„:•, ,,..,,,„. -..,:- .i,_ . .' '.ii:.,, •-. -4,...--•„.1 ,.`'. ': -..,*,-:, ' .:.:...3L-,....* ..T.':,..-.- . ._. 1,..# .,- ci '' ''. '.1' .,,,,,"",;. f.--,;.', r- :, , ,.„,..„..„,.-.,..„,. ,,.. „.., , , , , ,....-...,..i. . ,.,.., .. .---,-,... .: ,, ....-.. ._,._;,... L .,. :,.., .. . .,.:.,- ..,-,,,-„„,...„ ..,,,,,,, ,,.,..„ . .. .,. ,„..:,,,-„,.„,„„.„ ,,...,,,,,,-„,. , ,..--...,..:- . - ..-. . .%....,...,,...„, . ,`1,"Lf,L).* .;'`; *,...;37,t. '`-• „1 p M1 ) 1r ..y p Ya ,I-� • u pgt' T ♦ r" .�:7A ,,'',,'.7.:' I T Ills � '� II,. ..� J?S?'' .� p� P St •�� � .v f110* • CI .„.. .•. 5 O a lz 1• . I _t * c •Y. 1 �..' NI r.,....., . . .., 4.- i. i alt. 1„y( .Alreg s . ,. • 1 .. ,�,y.. r (1 �` t � ♦y ,L r�. ar'^ _ WJE l.i' .o r -.. yyy ' •�s s4 e o iiiii _Ai x �� ...; _ IIIII; ��1` •arc * .J, t Ji 7 44,*(1100 tit � ` r Eile : 9 J". t f J,•gam T x. , 'Y�5 = fi' '•-_,,,,:i,...,,-- - r' n. .,:;.. 0, .ti.:., ,,...,,,,,., ,,.... , :•-:-- - i r ;.„.. :,. . „..:,. _. ....,_,,... ... .4-- ,, ,,.- .! ,,..,„ i,_-- ILL: ^� I L ,LC a ,'L$ 1 'z.yr „ S . 1`S,� 1,. _ t �. �'• ...x. r�.. �_ lam. 14 sr f4yS'• 0. #- L l;� f, � :. Tsk1,q�l._. " f i.... i.,7:4,',+ a .. .. 1, J I B , , ct s ��'Sc gr 5' - . 16-.1.- ,-,• ,....w4r' a ' x p `s . '' ..,..-."1,/„,1/./: /• ! t res d" a a .¢7 ti �- ) z; M.,r.SS ?.A .,his;' •.tea ♦. .h r \: / ..,...t%:,,-,.1::;:14;,,,t-µ ..l 9 cY ♦: `G �j f.�..J a� y r� y` \ i,•�pp i,y F�yQ.K , i > �f t,' �x , w Fir t n }, y'.. 1t� ,�f it i y.� 3r "4'1---''."77e 011' Hari. ..'t';',...,....:1':'-:. �e$'C ti 1 r`-p '7' `v - •_ ' { + 1:1;-4:t::-• f� $ „.'#;r ,,rgq ..)- v 1 - r . • a t t, 4 24;'y-�j�iy�, °"," { to -. I r : � �+ �-f '' Y„%.::.'"d%;.'.. of -D 1l�/ .'3 i' v ly, �.I 4 i ,:d*„ s 1;01C•;; �k',7• ` ! .: ,, 'a • • 17 w0 gyp .. 1 '' -•�,� a i -. �. --,,,,-,...1';',';' =4;'..-: r t Pi YM1 N • ��. ..,". Y d :1', R<! t a W•# �Rl y CD r. '.?"4".... .-- 0 9�y y < s. r E�tr. d . ' ,,-ter �` z w otic .> — ` - • s., .,...-44,.- 11`..tet •, r q � n=. t} ✓ _ 604. rf_ Lr , ' ._µ f' ' .i d\fit. .74- � 7t, " �',,, ',7-.'::::.=,- 1.--7 dt- • 64iaeA* � ; tet ,. b nrlfsx '1 .sr..,„,,,,,.., , ..., . ..°' + 'f k�11 L ' ]r)�� 'tea 7. I iii .„ •r...'. 'tt..7.'''''... ":• : 1: : ::.: ,,,.7, w • y iti.4 : - 1,, •,„_. +` f � � ,� �.- CO •iolOiL. � ; .� 1 ' • ; a. 71* ;04 '':.:z I . 4 c,: .. 7F-0-'41441 N11114111. L (13 • w f 0 0 0 , :. O r.. ro k it mi i 4. 1.3t $ iy '1 ,,..:, 1... ..., ,. ,..,--- ., /',.4., . A ,:_...,,,.,. : , .....,,,,,,-- .,, ,N, .01,r1:,... k•,.. d r...v,:.:, 2_, , , . t r'f.'1 w.,::. . ' ,. ail, , ,t[ty E s 1 CD CO • 6 ' ,? , i °, i , \- ,' z 1 !; k fi,r...$ O . t-.. '.,..7...' '', ....::•. •e , ;‘,.t I 4•' •:'s ' r • • '?'"• ,, ‘,.. ' i ' lo, „r,• I, . r • • 10..1.,. - . • 4 `4: f. ...7° 1;%, 1„, 'As. . * . ' ',i,,,s •, ; . . • . , C\I ' ; % ,.; .4;4...s,4 I% 41• 'n '' Vil!4 11 .1.41 illt• 119 I 1 0 t.fp . \ •r''') '."; ;; .; 4 .r",4 4".. • illi• ......... .i 0 , •cs !..' ;' .•' ; ,•'• 411 r ; •;-4. VP:», (..) •.. • 0 . (... - w . ...,- ., • - -i z- 'k -.:1". . • ..• ' :, . 44'; -rA-41,1, ;:-1• e; • .. , . "',10,• ,-, ° . .7. ° , ,-010111.44- ;'- ' r•-- ••1• 11..y ' ' ... jiii,.1 ' ' - ' ''' ' ..*';'' ' . 0.4$4,41•4 - '•'" .. • ''-. .'ti ' ' ,. . , . .. . . • • - ' ... 41t• li .•r . 7; ,k,. .,-, ,,, - . . i It.t. '/ . ' , 40‘.. 1 • ' , .;......:. . '''' %,.. si ' . - - , . .. ''i` 1 t - •.. . ..•,.1.. .. ,... , . ..... . . . `. . .. -,,, . .','. , , • ..T.* ' ' •. • ', , ' ,,',...,iiit.. •,'-',',. .. -,,i . . , • 1 ., • r.:,-. . , • . -f-• . , .:'....;1,,,' - • '' ' . "- ' ;13 . 'Imi - I", 4 ..,- 4*- . . ; 4 • ..1.;',1:..• ' • .t ... .,, ' .7'4-.7' ,... ' • - . • % , ' '4 .„.. . .,, . • „. ,,, .. L,,, 7 • . . ,.• •1''' ' e'.- ..,,, .1-,*.i','(2, r „ -. ;.,. . • . ..- , - - • i , .. , • _ , .... ... .. ., „. . ,,.4 ;• •,, z ... .. : 3 .,,01..', '; ','4"., .14 444-,,t4 -,---4,4,v •- .•• ,‘ :11 . c. - . .. . • L-4''''.'":4.4., ','.''-•!.•%. 4-,i'''-, .?..,,;.:. ;,,,p't. 4,14..ire ,„, p .,• '' . '-';'.-.,;.. l'. ' -. -:,--,- , cop, ,;•.,-i „;„,,,,,,-,,,,,,,..,;‘,0„4.,„. , ,‘,' ',...!:4;itti,.., - .i,,, ~,;7,',",' ..- ,I, , ,,.. ' • ,;.: •.:.: ,..1; ..`...k.,, ' N A.11- .:,-,..7,.: ,•.!,4! ;• ,1,•.',„ . -Ari•-:-,..,,, , •• i,... • • . 0) .11. ._,,,:-„,,,•-...,. ..,, 2--,::er:„1,07 .....4-tor -,:,,,.......r.,,:izt„-., •-•- • ,..• ,•.....1 • ,, -4...„.„..s ** 7 ••-.."...-.. 1::-.'..`,. .•!:0-','„,-•..,04::.r;c.. `:„.. I , '-,.-. . '..i. ''','..- .' ' '1,'!'..71,...' "/-!- ''''''''',)!:::-A.t.:‘,4:',:•• •-lr, • '12' • ';'s*s4?•i,A:-,A'''''i$15.% \ji 1 ; '''':,,...,,,:,.,.7, :. .„... -4• .444,4. • k-44'it...-4;•-st;:', 7,4* ;‘,-* i` ,' 's.'4,: s*' - ,,-•.,.:., 1, \11\1\ifil ' r..s,1/4, $•;- 6*,;.,"*„..'sil,..' , • .-4-.1',1;„ ..,,:.!,.*:-, . ,, i, -.. ,., .,,v,z,„.-f..,, 1 - c c'..•.- '' ) ' 1`70'.:,,','' ' -'''-`'' ',... -- •. ' ( . 4 ,i . • ' '44 • ' '44 .4' '''' • ' I- 'I -,:,.:.:91,`,Z-,••. -,•••:,', ' r ', f : . .„,,,r,l,1. i.,,,-; . „..,„ ....-, ,'1,\t ) 1 , 01",.-1, h• Ii.„"F:../ t ... ,,,,441, 7 ,, , ' .!.. ;17 94,....;V ' trt to, . ,i„...-7,..,-,e4.--- .. .., _. . ... , ..ift. 4 - .., i '.. ,..! -., .. . .6„ .. . '/3..i.' '' •. •11/4., ,'.!‘' ' ' ,;: ... ,, .4 ....: ,.. . , i':; .'-i,'. `, - • . . '., '',.' •;iN,''.,-.",'-. .`!;-. '1..... ,;, .r..-: ''-:' ••r•":4'. ;,. 4:4',As:-:' • '''''' •', ;••A4 ; ) ' ,,; -P. f4e-• . 't,:''' I, '',- t,'.:1 .., 'V I,.i ..... '... • • . f -• • ; .s, lal 1 , Al ';, \, de s•-•---.=, 1 4.4.9 At,,,,..i;4"'" '4.14.44441, ',; ‘,4•'! i .1 • . '' , •1 ir..... ;; ih..' •,s1';.-dr; '4-i-tt ,,,,. -,ss i lac., • '. ' ' ' LU 0 'les ..s... s •' A I 'i '' ' ' ' (V — , 0) =j1 - ,1 .,, •,'' ....,.;',',',:-',V.,..--- •-•,. , ,.' ^A .• u , 1 i' . l itt .':'':. ;' ''' ''.1 ° i'‘i';'L.L'....1.........i 3..1.i.._J!......3 _____, t-------- - — - _ -i-- - i -- Legend [ ]- 009000109U50001 0 00150 ---r— EXZ. MIN P [ 60TH ST W PRO-S i " EEE9—s -- ......_ _. _ _ tu ------ > P00-I P051100 COISISOISal 001 Iii m P0D 2 < 1 I P00 a < ----- \---- -- --f----A \ __, =AP.0PUO Planned Un,o,et - '- "-41 -------- ----- 21 \ V....-.,/"" ''' < Ec-,7 ...........D. .../••–.'"'--"\ I ,r ,,,''\\ Ci /).--.. ,.. 0 .11 i=i'LD P'P'Edna. er Planned Senbor Calze N \ n,„, w+E 61ST ST r:.%,:•::J moo- S _. Nanning D•PI --7------ i -- - --- - - - ---- L I0 / .:z.r • 4 ' ' ..... I 2 LIJ le a i 1 - • A„tt.* , k , _ re--, co ,:::::::!.:... ....:.-:::?...:,:...... gi.:.:.:..::•:: ::i'.::::.:::::..:::: r.---:-.. ..:-.......'..::.•. I— ..•::•.:::••:•::::':::::'::—..::':-'..::.:.:.: .':.':.*:::.:::::•:::::':':.:::,::':-.:1'::.:•:::. . . . . . .... . ••••• • •••• .• •. .••...•. . . .,. . . . ...• .•• • : •: -..:... . . .... . . .... . .... .... .. .... ...... ....... — WPM ...., ..•.. ...., ........... ............ .. •*-- — •• • ••• --• • ••••••• •• — . 'IMMO -----"::::...''..."..............i.:E i"::ii::.::::::.;:;.:•.;..::....::.:•::c.•,•.:.::.i.i.i.1:::...... `, — ••• • •••" ''••.. •••••••••••..' •••••••• . . ... .......... ... .... • ..• . ..\ . ... ...• . .... .. ... . .. ... ... ....... , 62ND ST w .i. ___J • • • —••• • • • •• • •...........:.:::....-:,::::::.::.:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:7:-...:-. :::.•::•...::::.•:...i:,:. .. 4k, :....:;::::.:.::•:.:....: • :•-i;:...-;;:•::-::,.......:::::•::.:::„.. - ...„ 4 i• ,----,, 1 ,. . :::'..:•.%:::.....,:-:•••:•:.:i 7:::::•:':: . • 4.... •6.A .. ....... .. ...... ..... ki • • . — _ •• • ..... ' •e -"' .....• • , 4,0,1 -‘111INW , • 1 , ____••••• .. ••• ..•... •, .1,1, .,- • •,, i •,- ...?,,....;:.:.::•.::::.::*::- • ••• dy0 ‘ , •--- •..,„--- • • \ ---------t----- t \ .. `,.. / 1 , • 0 GARRISON ,4-------------- -/ .„ o • .• t • --, c , / t • •,„--- • 4 w ,------ .... - > , a r• 7 NANCY LA 0 --- / 0 re co i.,•:.4::,.. •** ••• / w - > P• • .. < — v•v • 1- I LI _ - _i i 1 nc / p• _ i 1 . .:- Wooddale Ave & Valley View Rd Zoning Map City of Edina k(ce 4t7V.) Hennepin County, Minnesota Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design -� v Transition r I © : B33 yy in I (60'Deep)` r Z ', IL Fa El ■ r f co '"� it 4.4,. 84Nx a.t © W. 61 St Tiansitep i!•� , to .. O t 7:7/' (36'D rpj� y I r''. �,, o, \ . � \ iransltion� I: ,_ N (36'Deep)1 , I,, O 1'13 L_?�->. ir **414,14 t.:4I \ .,�1 Y i ..° it NN i. _ —_ v e ' • 2nd n h, _ W. 6 z ridNeighborhood Node Boundary dal il 11_ tI--i. 4 � � I Di IE. bi i'I Garrison Lane . k' U NE 4lEi 1111 . . Figure 4.3 1 Four Story Limit. Building Height ' Up to four stories,not to exceed 48 feet Limits Plan fig. Three Story Limit. * °s Up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet g 6 l4 Two Story Limit. P b Up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet i Ili gle �` Two Story Transition(36'Deep)* Height Limit: Up to two stories,not to exceed 24 feet(vertically)within theiii,„,,,, specified 36 feet in horizontal distance u. from property line. Two Story Transition(6o'Deep)* NMI 11002 - ibis Height limit: Up to two stories,not to11111 1100-3r � m _i, exceed 24 feet(vertically)within the �"t �.ccee�fas�riesm9b seat«neRa.er's fest specified 6o feet in horizontal distance •'t1:<': uoo-s RAs s be teminsab'ts' '' a°s, P ... . Rut share not exceed A stories ar 4a feet vto¢fra er as fie. from property line. Figure 4.3-b *(These'Transition'designations were created to establish a graceful transition from Existing Building Height Limits as Defined by Neighborhood Node properties with three story Building Height Overlay District (Source: Article Xl, limits to immediately adjacent residential areas Division 2,Building Height Overlay District,and outside the node.) Appendix A of the Official Zoning Map.) Woocidale Valley View Small Area Plan Page I 35 Al Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Preferred Land Use Plan: Neighborhood Node (NN) This plan introduces Neighborhood Node(NN)as a new land use category specifically for use within a portion of the Wooddale Valley View Study Area. Also see description and Table 4A. At shown,at Wooddale Valley View it replaces the previous Neighborhood Commercial(NC) designation that was established within this area in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. I • le LDI21 on LDR'/ S OSP -"-x'�^r� 1 -I .6 t (Pamela P,irk) LDi LDR •, d �'. / '� W. 61 St di-i / ' — — C. I 1 oa i __7_� I I LDAR j .� I o 1i istudy',r II or/ ` 1 IR — I Area 1 3 '1111 or It, 1—` i ,.,F I LDR 1 ^ elw11 �, f I 1 0 1 LDfd ..; 1` _ ■ I 1 o �pR Lr c z■ 1NCI I Va/' ` y 1 1 I e'o f I 1� pr.X f" r Former ' 1 V I IL,_ PJeignborhnod ___ , ll S , CommcrcIal Boundary 'J-6 2nd —I W 6 ' nd PSP New Boundary of® 7 ;` IDAR r Neighborhood Node t ' ► \ LL LIkr lDR s 1 LDR MW 1 41 1 1 LDR ■ 141.4Garrison Lane ' R We a rin in r, LbAR - NN Neighborhood Node(NN). High Density Residential(HDR). It is recommended that the apartment building located at the southwest corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road,currently planned HDR,be included in the Neighborhood Node classification on the Preferred Land Use Plan,as shown above. LDR Low Density Residential (LDR) Low Density Attached Residential(LDAR) LDA Open Space and Parks(OSP) Public/Semi-Public(PSP) 0S o No changes are recommended to these Land Use Plan classifications from the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan. They PS r are all located outside the boundary of the Study Area. Figure 4.2 Preferred Land Use Plan 32 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Similar to the Neighborhood Commercial category, Neighborhood Node: • Supports Neighborhood Serving Businesses. Encourages small-to moderate-scale businesses that serve primarily the adjacent neighborhoods. Primary land uses should be retail and services, offices, studios, and institutional uses. In addition, designation as Neighborhood Node provides: • Predictability for Current Landowners. Supports current owners' efforts to invest in improvements their properties by providing a predictable planning framework for the area. • Flexibility for Redevelopment. Provides greater flexibility to the development market by more explicitly encouraging the inclusion of needed housing. • New Gathering Space/Placemaking. Encourages intentional integration of landscaped open space and new formal public spaces. • Protection of Community Values such as Scale,Walkability and Character. A set of Development Guidelines protects the scale, walkability and character of the existing area by regulating the relationship of buildings-to-streets and the transition of building heights from node-to-neighborhood. Table 4A-Neighborhood Node Land Use Category(Also see Figure 4.2.) Land Use Category General Description Development Guidelines Density Guidelines NN In general,small-to Building footprints generally less Maximum residential Neighborhood Node moderate-scale than 20,000 square feet(or less for density up to 30 dwelling commercial, individual storefronts). units per acre(du/acre). residential or mixed Parking is less prominent than (Densities are further use buildings serving pedestrian features. constrained by the primarily the adjacent parameters of the neighborhood(s). Encourage structured parking and Building Height Limits open space linkages where feasible; Plan*). Primary uses emphasize enhancement of the encouraged are pedestrian environment. neighborhood-serving Maximum Floor Area retail and services, Encourage development to comply with the Wooddale Valley View Ratio(FAR)per zoning offices,studios, code. institutional and Neighborhood Node Development residential. • Guidelines*: A. Building Height Limits Plan B. Building Frontage Guidelines C. Gathering Space Guidelines D. Site-Specific Guidelines E. General Guidelines • The Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines are found on the following pages. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page I 33 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.5 Guiding Principles These principles, which were mentioned on the previous two pages, were initially drafted by the Consultant Team during preparation of six long range scenarios following the Discovery Workshop. The principles were vetted by the community at the Dream Workshop along with scenarios and a list of public realm improvements. They were subsequently revised by the Consultant Team and approved by the SAPT. These principles steered the preparation of the goals, policies and implementation steps in Chapters 3-5 of this plan, and should be used by the City in the review of development and redevelopment proposals and plans within the Study Area. Place. The Study Area should be Graceful Transitions to Neighborhood. recognizable as a place and visually Graceful transitions should be attractive. maintained from more active areas to Gathering. There should be a places quieter neighborhood streets for people to spend leisure time, immediately beyond the node. whether in a commercial or public Parking. Most residential parking locations. should be in attached garages or under Neighborhood Businesses. There the building. Views to commercial parking should be softened by should be businesses that provide plantings, walls or fences. services or goods desired in the neighborhood, including small Street Edges. Buildings should be offices. The amount and located near the street sidewalk configuration of commercial space without intervening parking. There should be allowed to adjust in should be trees between the curb and response to the market. Property the sidewalk. owners are encouraged to keep Circulation and Connections. Walking, their properties economically viable bicycling or catching the bus in the and attractive. Study Area should be safe and Housing. Sites should be allowed to comfortable. The Study Area should be transition to housing from business well-linked to the nearby use in response to the changing neighborhoods. market demands. Role of the City. The City should Height and Size of Buildings. Future provide a land use plan, zoning buildings north of Valley View Road regulations, design guidelines and public should be one to three stories tall improvements that support the depending on their location relative intentions of the property owners and to nearby single family housing. the broader community while being Properties in sloping topography on sufficiently flexible to guide alternative the south side of Valley View Rd ideas. should be allowed to be four stories. 12 I Page Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Wooddale Valley View Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines 4-= A. Building Height Limits Plan The building height limits for the Neighborhood Node are indicated in Figure 4.3. WooOdJ.Vol*view Generally: Neighborhood Node Development • Height Limits Near the Center of the Neighborhood Node. North of Valley Guidelines View Road, building heights may be up to three stories, not to exceed 36 feet. South of Valley View Road building heights may be up to four stories, not to exceed 48 feet. • Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful transitions to single family areas are important(as specified on the Building Height Limits Plan), the height of new buildings may be up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet. Figure 4.3 Building Height Limits Plan, on the following page, defines height limits throughout the Neighborhood Node. Figure 4.3b,also on the following page, depicts existing height limits so that comparison can be made between current policy and what is proposed. 34 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan MI Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design 40:sk.1}i. B. Building Frontage Guidelines ti ! The location of a range of climatically-appropriate frontage types is depicted by w.«m.t.H.y,,— Figure 4.4 and Figure 4.5. These guidelines do not address style or building Neighborhood Node Development vernacular but will ensure streets that are lined with ground level features that Guidelines contribute to active, safe and walkable streets. Generally: • Building-to-Street Relationships. Figure 4.4 Building Frontages F1-F6 illustrates typical configurations of building to street (private-to-public) relationships and describes their varying appropriate context. These 'Frontage Types' shown are based on successful historic precedents found in many older multi-modal neighborhoods of Edina, including the Wooddale Valley View Study Area, and throughout the Twin Cities and the Midwest. • Node-to-Neighborhood Transitions. The frontage types are keyed to their appropriate neighborhood context within the Neighborhood Node in Figure 4.5 Context Areas. The purpose of the map is to guide new development toward ground level building design that maintains visually graceful and walkable transitions from the more active areas to the quieter single-family residential neighborhood streets. Figures 4.4 and 4.5 on the following pages present the Building Frontage Guidelines of Wooddale Valley View's Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines. .® 2, ,- sem° p "57 R O� �Q ..• l °sed c') °o C;'. 1, G �° ` / O < y d o co. 0 *i. L' S® p E _ .i 15 4_.' o J 2 -.'".Q,y ' 1 s Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design F • F1 Storefront Appropriate Context:This frontage type is for small retail or ✓ `` service spaces fronting public spaces in Core areas. r w Configuration:There may be an exterior entrance for each ,. ..."1". A a, t leasable space,spaced relatively closely along the sidewalk. ' rr■i ??0f4e.... Follow City of Edina guidelines for commercial storefronts for lie �1 glazing,setbacks,awnings,signage,lighting and for related ® t,,--= �_,, outdoor commercial uses such as sidewalk cafes- .i- IF2 Doorway (At-Grade) ..Appropriate Context: This frontage type is for smaller commercial spaces in commercial or mixed use buildings that front a sidewalk.This is not to be used as a substitute for Storefront,where Storefront is merited or preferred,in core , I , areas.The Doorway has less window space because the I # /__ interior use might be office rather than retail ;hi i,. L. T t_— Configuration: The at-grade doorway may serve one or multiple interior users.If set back 6'42',a'door-court' provides space for bike parking,seating and greenery. Stoop 011 ,-, 0t.. ' 1 I F 3 Appropriate Context:This frontage type Is primarily for single l let . -I 4.. family row houses and multifamily buildings with units facing - rt the street.They provide a good transitional frontage condition G=.1 for buildings in between neighborhood and core areas. 'I_[1I., � C'.' `•''' Configuration: Exterior stairs access a sheltered or recessed , 0 ��,, I`r^' area large enough for a family to stand and wait for the door to I IT - --"`l be unlocked,and for guests to stand back after ringing the doorbell. Stairs facing the street provide a social setting. Shared Entry i ' F , 4 1_ii . � $ Appropriate Context:This frontage type is apartment ' buildings.This residential frontage may be also used in a / j, vertically mixed-use building that also features Storefront ' 1. I frontage. Z�I li. I Configuration: There would be a single entrance to the gi 'moi , , Isecurity building with features. Individual apartments would I ,I �! i ' have entry doors along central hallways. Buildings with this �,_,. F condition may also feature the Stoop frontage for first-floor units having direct access to the sidewalk. I F Porch & Yard 5 Appropriate Context:This frontage is typically for residential applications but can be found on commercial buildings, , , � .r especially in transitional areas between single family streets r 0 Ipil III ;'j ti I � and more commercial blocks- 1.;itshl�, TIP— Configuration:7.5'clear zone allows porch to become 1;,',,' I,, ` ,;f-� 't -` furnishable living space-Accessible entries should be accessed A mom from the front to the side of central stair,which should be Y r • visible from the street. f C, F6ommon Lawn . Appropriate Context:Common Lawn describes the predominant primary frontage condition - ;., . ' found throughout Edina's residential ' li neighborhood streets. t I " _ Configuration:See Clty of Edina's current t- rt a�T f"1 regulations governing setbacks and lot,yard and Ali _ building placement of single family homes. Figure 4.4 Building Frontages F1-F6 High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 13 7 iH3 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design C. Gathering Space Guidelines As redevelopment occurs over time, small landscaped open spaces and a larger y,goddele Vell.y view public multi-use space should be introduced strategically throughout the NeighborhoodNodea Neighborhood Node. These maysoften the buildings, buffer views to surface Development g Guidelines parking, provide transitions to nearby single-family housing, provide outdoor gathering places and generally extend the green character of the neighborhood. These spaces may be privately or publicly owned and maintained or owned and maintained as part of a public-private partnership. Multi-Use Gathering Space. A public multi-use space such as a plaza could be incorporated into improvements or redevelopments proposed at these locations: • The City-owned property at Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue • The ValleyWood office site at the northeast of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road intersection • The Edina Village Market and/or the former gas station site on the northwest corner of the Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road intersection Figure 4.6 on the following page illustrates methods of incorporating gathering space guidelines. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan // Page I 39 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design t. \ ti 4I k): , ,i l'. �._ is 41 _ '..\�4 1 Y` ' :1,( � i:IT/I.1r ,\.. , '' 44r• ' � I`tci' t ,1 'fit \1`` !1 t-. `�\�h I � '1,-1 ,Y I , '14/, Y �/1, ; .,I itiino S1-4 41W%'.:1N. i~t ,--4 aft \(''',, ; lir �'37,`.h4'6 > rt;/�! . ,tiili,l Atli 1134 ` �1 ,r.-.,.1,4:',.-. �-..,l2 F., cll.M 1 I t = .'"'").'Llb4" -::::-.':...„".'.: 12':::' * I---":s'l'‘Ii'.7..11,- jV._---:.e:\c": 7.*,111:31.t at Milpili.'L4IIIC. 4i I 4 . . , i-..1,0' r i,Y." ems �. . a� rl .Illi � 11 b - �s + 1' - a--. 2 ' '11 ICI j 4-; + ` 11. ,,r t I t`4�.vr Y�1[, !F '.' 1 "d --�.i Z .. r ,,,,,\ i., fi, y — 1 1 16 r I, ', \ -,„- 1 Ap..... . ,N - ''.4'' 'V V1'4 10 1 .t.,Is '116.11/ 1 - -• ,o , III I. - -ice -� ,IA �:, ' c� — j ,.. I ,' W ' C) 1'' 41 Figure 4.6: Concept Illustrating Gathering Space Guidelines at the Northwest Corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road 1. Spatial Enclosure. Enclose and activate the space with taller buildings with active ground level uses. 2. Holding the Street. Bring (cozy) all buildings up close to the public space or the street. 3. Protection From Elements. Plant trees along the edges of all streets and spaces to provide shade and protection for pedestrians moving next to and in and out of buildings. Encourage deep awnings along all shopfronts. 4. Programming. Program the space with annual, seasonal and weekly events to activate the space. 5. Flexibility. Maximize flexibility by using temporary or mobile event equipment, and avoid encumbering the space with permanent vertical features. 6. Visual Interest and Identity. Anchor key visual points or defining and active spots such as intersection corners with meaningful/interpretive public art, perhaps doubling as rest/seating. 7. Universal Design. Establish universally accessible sidewalks along all edges of all spaces. 8. Accommodate Cyclists. Accommodate bicycles around the perimeter of the space with fewer steps, ample bike parking and safe access to bike lanes. 40 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design '�,. .: t`t .' - ._,,,. "`N' y`1{• Vii �! - 4 0,...,.... ..,,,i- i I i< Ii 11I101Ift1Iff0 II 11111 1 .ms The site owned by the City at Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue Site C) The City-Owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road Because of its ownership by the City, size, configuration, and location near the eastern end of the Study Area,the City-owned parcel is recognized as a unique and critical property. (See Parcel A on Figure 4.8) Community members' opinions about its future use in the Study Area were varied and included commercial, residential, mixed use, and a public use consisting of a plaza/park/open space. Of primary importance to the community is that any new development be carefully designed to respect the scale and context of the single family homes northward along Kellogg, and that the success of adjacent businesses are not negatively affected. • Leveraging the Property to Accomplish Plan Goals. *Regarding the Long Range Use of The City-owned property should be leveraged to the Land as Public Space: Both the advance the principles, goals, policies and guidelines Guiding Principles(in Section 1.5), and the Land Use and Community Design of this plan. Optimizing the use of the City-owned Goals(earlier in Section 4.3), property (0.25 acres) will likely require assembling the encourage the strengthening of the property with neighboring privately-owned parcels in intersection of Wooddale Avenue and the future. At that time, the City will review the Valley View Road as the active center merits of any development proposal for conformance Neighborhood Node. Land uses near to this plan. Future uses could include residential this location (such as the City—owned site)that encourage economic activity, and/or commercial development, with possibility of public gathering and social interaction, dedication of a portion of the site as a Gathering will be encouraged. Accordingly, the Space (see Gathering Space Guidelines) or other long term exclusive use of the City- public space. During the interim period, the city- owned property as a passive open owned land should continue to be maintained as space is not encouraged. passively used and publicly accessible open space. * • Creating a Flexible Framework for Public—Private Collaboration. Previously the City worked with major commercial property owners to facilitate new development in the node, so somewhat greater flexibility in the planning for parcels labeled A,B,C (as shown in Figure 4.8)was assumed in the small area plan. Thus,the goals and policies stated earlier in this chapter, along with the site specific guidelines on the following pages, were developed simply as a guiding framework. Similar to all other sites in the node,there exists the premise that land assembly and market forces should and will determine the 44 I P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design exact land use of any redevelopment. Figure 4.8 shows optional redevelopment alternatives for the City-owned site are considered in this plan in the context of various land assembly alternatives illustrated by Figure 4.8. • Property A Only(0.25 acres)- Capacity studies were not performed during the planning process for Property A as a redevelopment site (by itself) due to size constraints. It is conceivable that a small commercial or residential development could be accommodated, but would likely require off-site shared parking. • Properties A +B (0.40 acres combined)-This is alternative was studied during the planning process.See Figures 4.8-4.10. The current land use on Property B is a surface parking lot that is provided for patrons of the ValleyWood office building. • Properties A +B+C(0.55 acres combined) -This land assembly alternative, due to its size, presents the most flexibility in terms of design alternatives. However, site plan alternatives were not studied during the planning process because Property C was outside of the Neighborhood Commercial boundary in the Comprehensive Plan and, therefore, outside of the Study Area.*1. Jc f.11:4::::' Z,V,';,•:1-1-'1 1 -1. 1 -I li 1 11-i ' ' _ % ^ C— i.----±i4 1? *Regarding Application of r, ±«'�.\tr-i: -t% : - t 1,"51. I'.lAITH° ' ' I Guidelines: If Property C were to be combined with the other two ,�. ' n sites in a redevelopment project, °-01; � , ;; , , r. the principles,goals and policies . •; of the Small Area Plan,including ' ',. ; the Neighborhood Node '7' a `; Development Guidelines,should L17 :k r, apply, ensuring a graceful 1 ,,e *'t_._1- C 11 ,2 1 " ', transition (both in regards to i; 1 II Edina*using .t tli height and frontage)northward • I-: ; Founeapion '" a 9 f 9 •• . along Kellogg to the single family ,...„, kik:. .,., .....„,.: - 7 ' ' I,f 115 . ; _ homes adjacent and across the . ; '\ ,',,,,,I, V. I,;y.,�Nood i .7,,,!--,-.,-„,, street. A- i4t. . li ,"F 1. t `� } _ `a ,y� � -,-.� x', 0 1 `1[3 IIL a Figure 4.8 Property Ownership near City-Owned Site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 145 F17 Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Gauging Community Preferences.Three hypothetical site development scenarios (site capacity studies) were presented to residents at the Progress Update Event on December 3rd 2014,to spark discussion on the merits of different types of development that could occur on the property. (See Figure 4.9). Each of the three options assume that collaboration is possible with the owner of the parking lot parcel to the north. Opinions of the neighborhood residents attending were exactly split between support for the commercial (50%) vs. residential concepts (50%): • Flex Commercial. (The favorite of 50%of participants.) The 'Flex Commercial' option includes one or more neighborhood-serving businesses in a one story format. Preferred design guidelines for this option are shown in Figure 4.11. • Rowhouses. (The favorite of 34%of participants.) The 'Rowhouses option includes a diverse set of market rate attached single family homes with tuck- under garages and elevated stoops. • Manor(Flats/Apts). (The favorite of 17%of participants.) This option included a multi-unit residential building with parking underneath. If the market determines that commercial use is unsuitable, acceptable alternatives to commercial use could be rowhouses or a small multi-family residential building using the Stoop (F3) or Shared Entry (F4) building frontage. Other uses and design concepts are certainly possible. Flex Commercial Rowhouses Manor (Flats/Apt Building) 5quere Feet u..er.:.olio...-tar Cr.:do Square Feet 11 3(r 13AI091ulal ietA4 ntr-on(2 h.uh I umrxnt" Square poet 14 V};21.0 l.n.dtvL!ca' lo iI,•:c•.-b r,cuc.d1 Lrv:ng Il bving a-2 unitt(mrrv.4 domed Inn., 17-7':n oh..1.4t rr•.dnv'en; I.. Hei4M 1 craw Heytnl I 0444 vaster*over rear tuck ardr•garages Ne aht l St.t,ow'Shur et/(woo fron•age aver rot level 01 bk... Parking 2e 24 wrens.tfa.r•uI Park,g 121117 retained n WEkrOur sutra rr:ti) gr;.rd pm noir II pert 1 t grml'u1 :.g M.shire IvkwgrnrM(lrrkun4•r1 Pe duns 7p No dr g allay 4.8 ter-It mu nett on gdingg 1RRd ParII RL rpnN refmnaM gong t 1bgr, + 1II 1 '1 )Pr" .iM vaunt It i eI a 4 tare.Pe-1 Wu tl ruble Space .._I.d Pabtc Wr6ng ui Nva. ! bead I.02•122 g t r e.str.ed oder{are toss Pobik Spare fro,3orcura,3 arida from cruo mire oldraur•at 1..5Mef Range 4.I Use '.ral.a.ate Wale far*441.1,....11•444 c.morn.anglar Pubic Space rono orfo r c nen A,pet metersembh :tent bladmg Range of Use Foal et lie gFuxh+:ad Set..ng Su•ntorroF:urh mise o i-nm VIM 2103 of tots 24'w de rdrl•decal Range of Lite .r aer•re cardamon ono ire-!aa Mrrnra on r. shep t ra'e/nev S ItR t.-cnr,Sun,.Oilre 111 ''N r'r ln.n ton:VW,f lwl ovrir. ng Spv.r.I Iw44 gu.bw.r ucla.l Pero a So.v cv lar. M �, �Me•-51udq .: Ft F2 - F3 F5 j , F4 SnOndrrver PofdbM,EN[fTRwl - ?�"' 1 - 1. eePorkupand Att.a.niir o.T•e +.- ,, ___. z ..+nue:r gado v Tma.Ibr+7 _ i ^ } .n •-• .- 1-I0"1 (...F� - - 4 . . . _ � i Yz v Vi L ___ f __ , ... .. . zo _.,..._-- - ---- - 1.-tits li-----1 °, 7l ---t-vi"; , , ,, ,..., Jr, .. � a r , � Or S I Figure 4.9 Three Alternatives for Properties A+B:City-Owned Site(Property A)+ValleyWood Parking Lot(Property B) Presented for Community Review at Community Meeting in November 2014 High Resolution PDF available in Project Archive at EdinaMN.gov/WVV 46 I P a g e WooddaledValley View Small Area Plan 1U Chapter 4 - Land Use and Community Design Redevelopment Guidelines for Properties A+B'Flex Commercial'Alternative Guidelines for the redevelopment of the City-owned site as "Flex Commercial" alternative are as follows. Please also refer to Figure 4.10. a. Shared Parking. Partially reconfigure parking to open up for shared use by the new commercial spaces. b. On-Street Parking. Retain head-in parking along Kellogg Avenue. c. Frontage. Storefront (F1) Frontage along Valley View Road. d. Public (Gathering) Space. Increased set-back/chamfering at the southeast corner allows for an expanded sidewalk seating area and/or fair weather retail/merchandising space. It also allows for continued visibility to the small shops on the northeast corner of Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road. e. Service. Loading, solid waste and recycling bins accessed and handled off the rear service lane, away from Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road. f. Neighborhood-Serving Businesses. Initial tenants should include neighborhood-serving commercial businesses. 4 L ' H '''',4:104'. eHHI I I I I I____J 11I1IrIIIII- I . III. III , le* Figure 4.10 Redevelopment Guidelines for Properties A+B as"Flex Commercial" Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan Page 147 Graceful Transitions to Surrounding Neighborhood. At certain specified locations at the perimeter of the Neighborhood Node where graceful transitions to single family areas are important (as specified on the Building Height Limits Plan),the height of new buildings may be up to two stories, not to exceed 24 feet. B. Building Frontage Guidelines Building-to-Street Relationships. Guidelines describing preferred relationships of buildings to streets establish a sense of place, provide a graceful visual transition from busy areas to nearby housing, and ensure that the pedestrian experience is pleasant. Node-to-Neighborhood Transitions.Typical configurations of street-to-building relationships are described in the small area plan and keyed on a map to their appropriate neighborhood context within the Neighborhood Node. C. Gathering Space Guidelines Introducing small landscaped open spaces and a larger public multi-use gathering space should be introduced strategically throughout the Neighborhood Node and will help to support pedestrian movement and visual identity. Suitable locations are identified in the plan. D. Site Specific Guidelines Site specific guidelines are outlined for the following: • Corner Properties at Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road • Fairfax Avenue and West 61st Street • City-owned site at Kellogg Avenue and Valley View Road • The Eastern Gateway-Valley View Road at Oaklawn Avenue and West 62nd Street E. General Guidelines for the Entire Neighborhood Node Parking will be a constant issue within the Neighborhood Node for businesses, residents and customers alike. The plan recommends ways to include parking yet minimize the visual impact while strengthening the visual identity of the node through plant screenings and consistent signage. Enhancements to pedestrian and bicycle networks such as additional sidewalks,consistent lighting and bike parking facilities will improve the pedestrian experience for residents and visitors. This in turn, helps to create a more attractive work and retail destination for area businesses. Transportation and Street Design As was evident during the planning process,the City and residents desired to have the Neighborhood Node become more pedestrian and bicycle friendly as well as transit- oriented. This must take place within the context of Valley View Road,Wooddale Avenue and 62nd Street all being classified as Municipal State Aid streets,which serve as connectors to Highway 62 and Highway 100. The City should consider the following future improvements: • Automobile Traffic Ensure safe and convenient travel for traffic passing through and within the Study Area by: ■ Reducing lane widths viii i P a g e Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan A-ao ,,¢ r � yr ..,4,,,T,4,,' .,',i. y rd �`d x a4 RS: t 'N 5� Ca_ Y* ' f. s.'4.-. • �` ,,4,-,,,10, �' t .,I J t .4 III b�, ¢4 .*by 6 i.- . N H Y>7 tl' ky ,' Ned k 5 1/11--- .. ...,,,ititi li. d i , i,,,,, ,.,:, � 'Iit 1 :dill .\ 4i 7 4f '''''.4' , \ r. I y ��a �h� , r _•,,,,_• , ... , ,. .. ... ,. . •� r7 s1 ...,„ n r� r tF s�•F fh1�p�pf i ,1,.., 4. ay�y I a L r+l ''',.f0,4;;:.9a r hx¢' r 49:%, s is 3' ',''''''.1,','•'."" ;." H a t g J •'''','.4 ,r{ E 'Y S Jap. 1 i tS ` Rq "'b ' E4 aj. � ¢ f r 41 i.,*,,„* =:.; , Tim L,, r _ (...) 1,,,•40,u.., 111 -y Z ........— U M !Ill'ii —g- Lu 2 —4-- ----— . 0 2 4-> 1.1 --M=1=--- Z' - MIDIS I 111.11.I.E_ rd 44 Ir. NMI= Eil bag 11 BUIE ‘ III-- - ---.- MI WIEw- ill emm. _,, WIF_.&.- 4 ar= 1"---t -0 Eirs....., _......E, - ,iii.7.f..:Ji....a....... .... ..... 1.i.J . L—Eilll 1.111111114 "4111111.11W". > z --- OEM WI ---, ----: '//111.11.11111.111r ,twal:..4.1_,Atitalli alliim; 1=1117735411 A.....,„„,,,, _I if , ' 5 , ...ikill : , iii - ""zr-7..—. rz: z osu .. . 7 '-' r- meu --'-- < =moor - ''- ' jf - 4 . • OL— I-- MIRO 11111111 .... ' TZ./_,' LIJ IIII Me I , 1 0 a...J i I Ca_ . . NEM . . . . . 0. =II 141,_ D e.--s, \I, _ •Ailikmil ._ 1111111 ammr , , ° ,. .., .., (,) ‘0 • 6 il_ in ' 'IMIMIMili11.1":1=-4 Alio3 —i a, -"V- ,...4.- L.L. 5 , . 71> — Lc)t: T< ♦may -V ` N Cl) t Id 0 i:•. Z Vis'! _ .,,_ b v eZil...• W= 7 -1 _ �_ w ! w •✓ 4) k > IP /4. • G� a ..61.. o. iii_It IP �_- z - --a . _ i �i 14 , . mu..-7,-_-_i MOM Ce LU .7„07,74_, .4%.., 614,41,_ _ �, �. . Jas: > immiwri Ul [ �1 w T. Illame. ` - `-- IP_ w z i ' 3 =�:_ a VI ��_4 w UJ -mow _a 1 " - 1 . _ ....4„...„ .. .. s.\ ___ _. :4,...,4_ . ..... _,_ . _ .. ,,,,,,,4,- - <I '`t z :%11P up m o o =(( a j{ a _ J3 > a Z Ti o ,11 ik w v a-1 rt. ri'4.1.-it4e AM _ 1 4.- "----- a . ' 1-44ftek (>\)' C.9 N,), C-' 0 L, Gn CL) "'"(/ IL o 1 , Z ...NI '....Ir:a 1111 12? Z "NI C.•II I ' ›- it --- .-----.---k _I — .7....e ef....., . .. •CL.... (...) .AI .....) _C4Ial=1111 Z- IL E-1' <C: - ,, ,--- ---1 ......... la : so 11 _.c.:1:"Trii on\. o,_ , .. •g!!! 4111W " :_,, el- ML p.--I ----1111 1111..1 1111.11—=---i- (mom •__ J.._ 1 1.111-- -5 CNIVE" 7----q•r--- 1 1.1111 -1 t Fj.-21!sil LI , '40\X ...-‘••..--.. :1 ----11.- -11 1 _ r, "It MIL .,-. L.L.1 r• ill 5 u..1 _Ai ... - 021 II w wag ...• .....11........-, ..--- 0 Iirk7 al l - --- . I 0 J 6. -7" 'WY • W aa....._ r-4.-4'. .1111111m. 1.1.1 - ../ -111111M_a112 dr111.11.11. .-- Z --1 ..": .... Fe F- _____ 0= -.-..4-.11111•111i: W "Il 1111M. 0 W a. ...t WI,- '''. : ii 44 ilir4ir... .4.074a' .4 4 lfr* r ME NMI Ivor-, .,..11-AprINV . 1 ..: 1 - =1 t a" I'MililW 1 i 7 rn =-:j-'.-1 .:::77.11-i=_ -•,,. ,I o 6 - 1 < ,,, • rp ,..---- _, ,, sik,,,...;. --•-rr. .1111 I Atroir-- _ i01 tio, , Hid es -,*,. kt'"'..- ,.„. = cs) .., ,., • .N... , a, ----c-. , ,. Cl— ,i, :,',L§, ill, s'"\" 444.t 4)0J, a) 1 Pr t * III //4a .2 i:.,.„ c)c,.) ::._ 1E2,1. , :,,-i- ti\4:: -iltAN N, w c„,_. :E. co D ,L,, Bhill ,, ilk ., .%AA:, 1 co.° bra ,, / IIi ; \X\ 2 " an fit \`� II . 'it '' llit I 8 : , — � � rig: - 910,qt, ,�::`..: Ws'NW I s a :, • B N! MI \\\\\\\\\ \ z e���. = `at \0:\ 11.11' B 2 '-..r 1 eirrAk ‘ ItE K•11--1 --'-'11 ..-, • • •:1) , Bil . !Ill liur z - 1 ,,:' • \:_\ .:1:0'-`7: o �!' �I� jr° .�_ \t Z t.:,.;, `•• 1x`11/ \t yea. 0 . 1, al Ili*g Ill (041 1! \TO.. OA* 00 tW ille • kikii N i 19 B too a) 1 t! >. \\ \\ _.......A•••• .„74 vot. a) — \ sllelS fiu!wed l (B . I E 10l is "6�Yed Ll WO rt1 \a,_ \ ,,,,„,,,,,,,, . ,.. _ .64 \® ns60.d o r i \ B °' • . • i%•iiU@Q\s: •i•i•i0 B 0 \\.\\,7 i)0, \ 9L 101 4-4c LEI \ vg" : It 1004S is 1.9 ISaM 5 Aa s �I (ft Project Overview Edina Flats LLC, a joint venture of Gatehouse Properties and McGlynn Partners, proposes a low-density residential development with 18 for-sale condominium units within five different buildings. Refer to the enclosed site plan. The proposed buildings will be 3 stories at 4416 Valley View Rd. and 2 stories for remaining four buildings. 3 story building will be approximately 35 feet high with below-grade parking stalls. 2 story buildings will be approximately 30 feet high with enclosed attached garage parking. Within the five buildings there are 26 below-grade stalls, 16 enclosed stalls at grade. The development is envisioned to meet the demands of young professionals and empty-nesters alike. It offers an option for those empty-nesters who want to stay in Edina while downsizing their homes, and at the same time it provides a low maintenance living opportunity for young professionals who are attracted to the idea of living within walking distance to many recreational parks and facilities. The buildings will be constructed utilizing wood-framed structures, and the exterior materials will consist of stone, stucco panels, composite siding and glass. Windows will be expansive,allowing plenty of daylight into the dwelling units. Each home will feature exterior terraces that allow residents to take advantage of private outdoor space. Wooddale Valley View Small Area Plan The proposed redevelopment was designed to address the guiding principles of the Small Area Plan.The redevelopment will dramatically improve the current site conditions at this important intersection of Valley View Road and Kellogg Avenue.The buildings will have handsome exteriors and site designs that will provide a warm and welcoming pedestrian experience.The buildings will be positioned to visually define the street edge while screening all enclosed parking. No parking will front Kellogg Avenue.The project will incorporate attractive, high- quality native landscaping and lighting. Adding resident dwelling units at this location naturally creates a more inviting streetscape, as more people will be walking and biking to and from the site which creates an energetic, safe and people-friendly environment, in place of the existing vacant lot conditions today.The surrounding properties will benefit from the new improvements which include pedestrian walkways,yards and porches fronting Kellogg Avenue,dense landscaping, below-grade and enclosed parking and a strong design aesthetic. At the corner of Kellogg and Valley View, an outdoor public amenity is proposed. Zoning Existing single-family homes will need to be re-zoned to multi-family designation,commercial properties will need to be re-zoned to multi-family. Some setback variance will be needed for properties along Valley View Rd. Identification of parcels which will be included in the overall development proposal: 6120 Kellogg Ave., 6116 Kellogg Ave., 6112 Kellogg Ave., 6108 Kellogg Ave.,4416 Valley View Rd.,4404 Valley View Rd. Edina Flats LLC 'cfeQ1/4 Ok c.)\‘ Project Team GATEHOUSE DEVELOPER:GATEHOUSE PROPERTIES LTD. R�, P e R I r s Ll U David and Jan Carlson have over 70 years of experience in the real estate markets of Minneapolis -r ft and the western suburbs. Having developed over 800 townhomes,condominiums and single-family David Carlson,Owner homes,David Carlson knows and understands the real estate market. In addition,working with a Gatehouse Properties Ltd solid lender, he can demonstrate how an FHA Home Equity Conversion Mortgage will help the over Minnesota Real Estate 62-year-old buyer purchase more than twice the home with no qualifying, no personal guarantee, Brokers License:#586773 and no monthly payments. David has the technical expertise and financing options to make dreams realities. (See attached Pro Forma on page 4) Development Location No.of Units Unit Type Cherry Hill Minnetonka 85 SF&Th Woodside Minnetonka 7 SF Hilloway Glen Minnetonka 16 SF Woodbine Minnetonka 9 Condominiums Cheyenne Trails Minnetonka 6 SF Woodhill Minnetonka 24 TH Boulder Pointe West Eden Prairie 30 TH Oak Pointe Bloomington 61 TH Boulder Pointe East Eden Prairie 50 TH Waterford Shorewood 54 TH West Arm Spring Park 25 TH Normandale Lakes Bloomington 65 TH Vernon Hills" Edina 1E) Ili Crowne Oaks Eden Prairie 16 TH Northrop Lane Minneapolis 6 SF The Wilds Prior Lake 15 TH Dewey Hill South* Edina 43 Condominiums Normandale Terrace Bloomington 49 Condominiums Widsten Wayzata 29 TH Arbor Glen Baxter 62 Senior Apts Arbor Glen Villas Baxter 25 TH Village Place Buffalo 48 Senior Apts Various Single Family Homes Western Suburbs 33 SF Parker Village Robbinsdale 9 SF Portico Green Wayzata 5 TH&SF L^/oaddata Flatts3 St.Lc•up.Park 333 C:andominiuni Total Units 819 *Projects with similar scope and scale to this proposed development. CONTRACTOR:CBS CONSTRUCTION As a general contractor for commercial and multi-family senior living and affordable housing buildings GIBS since 1992,CBS Construction Services has established a superb reputation for professional,quality and on-time performance at very competitive pricing,while delivering value to our clients.The owners and architects from our past projects are well acquainted with our ability to deliver great value to your buildings while being very user friendly and upholding the highest standards of quality and integrity. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Keystone Crossings Townhomes Oakwoods East Maple Ridge Townhomes Lakeville,MN Eagan,MN , .j�f*ple Grove,MN Wooddale Flats Carbury Hills Townhomes v.iiLaf- ayette Family Housing St.Louis Park,MN Rosemount,MN O, Inver Grove Heights,MN Northwood Family Housing Forest Ridge Town s� scopal Homes Eagan,MN Forest Lake,MN\ ` t.lPaul,MN Twin Ponds Family Housing Hastings Marketplace Hous`it g Legacet.Anthony Farmington,MN Hastings,MN "� St }i ony,MN City of Edina I Response to Request for Proposals for Redevelopment ifa 7 \` Project Team l 1 Project Team DEVELOPER:MCGLYNN PARTNERS Patrick is an expert in the day-to-day management of multiple construction projects,bidding and estimating of costs,enhance client relationships and drive corporate profitability.Aggressive in M CG LY N N the identification and analysis of potential business/real estate pportunities.Successful in the identification of specific client needs, creating a unique product for a variety of clients. He is skilled in sales functions,specializing in raising capital, management,brand marketing,construction and development. Patrick McGlynn McGlynn Partners(Edina,MN) 3927 W.49th St.Edina,MN 55424 Founder 612)325-9436 pmcglynn04@gmail.com Apply knowledge in construction to seek out value add opportunities in all different types of real estate.Ability to relate to many different types of client needs and wants. Deep understanding of Minneapolis and surrounding are real estate markets. Find hidden value in many different types and locations of property. • Bought and successfully repositioned distressed multi-family property in Edina • Owner,value add and management of multi-family property in Minneapolis • Sucessful negotiation and sale of distressed single family homes in Edina Reuter Walton Construction(Minneapolis,MN) Project Manager Lead estimator for many single-family and multi-family construction projects throughout Minneapolis and surrounding areas. Negotiation with multiple sub-contractors throughout project,scheduling of multiple large construction projects,help clients and building owners understand scope of project. Problem solving on many complex projects. Follow-up with clients to ensure satisfaction of project completion. • Numerous new home spec builds in the Linden Hills area • Custom new$1 Million+home on Lake Minnetonka • Multi-story, multi-unit student housing buildings at University of Minnesota • Negotiation of sale of multiple single family home sites in Minneapolis RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Student Housing-525 10th Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN Student Housing-401 8th Avenue SE Minneapolis, MN Single Family Home-5185 Greenwood Circle Greenwood, MN .� Multi-Family Investment Property-3940 West 49th Street � �Q� Edina, MN C‘ (L0S\ Multi-Family Investment Property-2652 Bryant Avenue S Q cy _` Edina, MN N1 �\\1 .� Land Development-16870 Cedarcrest Drive &‘€C) Eden Prairie, MN G City of Edina i Response to Request for Proposals for Redevelopment `cN Project Team I 2 France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions Element Working Principle and Supporting Questions Give-to-Get; Plan & Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with Process the district principles. 1 How does the proposal contribute to the realization of the principles for the district? Response:The proposed project is located within the Valley View/ Wooddale district,which is envisioned to be a mixed-use community with a unique identity and increased transit connections that is inviting to pedestrians and cyclists and improves the quality of the neighborhood for residents, businesses, and property owners. Per the City's recommendations,the building layouts provide setback from the streets,creating more green space and walkability throughout the node.The building heights don't compete with surrounding single-family homes but create a smooth transition into the neighborhood. 2 How can the proposal move beyond the principles for the district? Response: The creation of this type of housing is creating a product that a great many residents of Edina have been asking for,single level condo with great walkability. 3 What tangible and intangible outcomes might be offered by the proposal but cannot be achieved by the project on its own? Response: The Valley View Wooddale District has the potential to be a very pedestrian-friendly and bike-oriented neighborhood, but this one proposed project cannot do it alone. All property owners within the district need to work together to make improved connections throughout the District,so that this is truly a walkable community. 4 What does the proposal offer as a way of balancing those outcomes provided by others? Response: By providing multi-family housing in the district,area restaurants and retail will be supported by adjacent residents. Additionally, new civic or municipal uses will also be possible because of the economic benefits of developing this site and the new residents who will be using the facilities. 5 What alternatives were explored to arrive at a proposal that is best aligned with the principles and the opportunities of the district? Response: Per the City's recommendations and that of the neighbors,the building layout has evolved in order to create more of a neighborhood feel,creating multiple buildings vs. one or two large buildings. Maintain greater setback from Valley View Rd.to make the sidewalks more inviting to pedestrians Edina Cultural Preferences; Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings Identity and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. 1 Discuss the materials and construction techniques intended for the building and the site with attention directed to ensuring an enduring quality is achieved, especially considering whether the proposal is a background or foreground element of the district. Response: The building will be constructed utilizing a wood-framed structure over a concrete podium,foundation and the exterior materials will consist of stone, brick, stucco,composite siding and glass. Windows will be expansive,allowing plenty of daylight into and views from the dwelling units. 2 What qualities of the proposal will be most valued by the community in 50 years? Response: The attractive,well-designed streetscape and public realm of the site are project qualities that will be valued by the community for a long time. Improvements to storm water management will promote better water quality in the receiving water body, including less pollutants and sediment that will leave the site. 3 Describe the ways in which the proposal highlights human activity in the building and on the site, especially when viewed from adjacent or nearby public ways? Response: Resident activity on the site will be readily visible, as some of the units at ground level will have walk-up porches and units on levels two through three will have outdoor space in the form of balconies and terraces. 4 In what ways does the proposal enhance the economic vibrancy of the district? Response:The project replaces a previous gas station, hair salon, and aging single family homes with a multi-million dollar luxury development. Adding residential units in this area will support the existing retail and commercial uses nearby and encourage new stores and restaurants to open. 5 How does the proposal adapt itself to changing economic opportunities of the community and the district? Response: As residents age in place,this type of housing option can meet the growing needs of the resident population, and adapt to the changing economic opportunity. This is a unique housing option that Edina does not currently offer its resident base and the subject site is a perfect fit given its location within the community. District Function Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district. 1 Describe the ways in which the proposal is self-supporting related to on-and off-site infrastructure and resources. Response:The proposed re-development will utilize existing on-site and off-site infrastructure,and no significant infrastructure improvements will be required to support the new use. 2 What impacts does the proposal pose on existing on-and off-site infrastructure? Response:The proposed re-development will slightly increase the number of residential units(increased density),and therefore pose a slight impact to the City's roadway and utility infrastructure. 3 What elements of the proposal support infrastructure needs of adjacent or nearby sites? Response:The proposed re-development will incorporate new pedestrian sidewalks,that may not currently exist within adjacent or nearby sites. Future extension of these new pedestrian facilities within the area community may be necessary. 4 Describe the infrastructure features of the proposal that are truly extraordinary by relating the performance of those features to current standards, requirements, or best practices. Response:The proposed re-development will incorporate storm water management features that will improve the storm water quality by means of infiltration. 5 How the proposal relies on infrastructure of the district for baseline performance? Response:The proposed re-development will rely on the existing roadway networks and public/private utility infrastructure for normal everyday use. Comprehensive Foster a logical,safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating Connections; Movement movement of people within and to the district. 1 What features and amenities does the proposal lend to the public Aat realm of the district? Response: Per the Valley View/Wooddale small area plan,this development will connect the neighborhood to the east with the commercial district to the west. Creating new sidewalks set back from Valley View rd. and public space to create gathering locations for the neighborhood. 2 What features and amenities does the proposal introduce to extend the sense of an expansive and engaging public realm to its site? Response: Creating more green space and place to display public art will significantly improve the public engagement.Adding resident dwelling units at this location naturally creates a more inviting streetscape, as more people will be walking and biking to and from the site which creates an energetic,safe and people-friendly environment, in place of the existing vehicular-oriented conditions today. 3 Demonstrate the ways in which the proposal supports pedestrians and bicyclists movement and identify those nearby district features that are important destinations. Response: The new development will work closely with all surrounding land uses to provide appropriate connectivity and long- term compatibility.The surrounding properties will benefit from the new improvements which include pedestrian walkways,yards and porches. Dense landscaping, below-grade and enclosed parking and a strong design aesthetic.The parcel's sidewalk conditions will be improved,thus supporting nearby sites(Town Hall Station, Snuffy's and Fitness centers)and encouraging area residents to walk for their shopping and entertainment needs. 4 What features does the proposal employ to ensure a safe and inviting pedestrian experience on the site? Response: The proposed access driveways will be new and clearly marked, replacing wide broken expanses of concrete thereby improving sidewalk connections and pedestrian safety.All site sidewalks will be reconstructed, and the project will incorporate attractive, high-quality native landscaping, and lighting throughout the property. Site Design;Transitions Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without"leftover"spaces on sites. 1 How does the proposal relate in terms of scale to it neighbors? Response: At the tallest point,the proposed project is 3 stories in height along Valley View Rd. Buildings going north along Kellogg and at the corner of Valley View and Oaklawn will be 2 stories,creating a smooth transitions to existing single family homes. 2 How does the proposal make full use of the available site, especially those portions of the site not occupied by parking and buildings? Response: The project redevelops the site very efficiently and landscapes the perimeter, making the public realm pedestrian- friendly and aesthetically appealing. 3 How does the proposal interact with its neighbors? Response: Drawing on the existing surroundings,the exterior facades will feature contextual details, such as front porch style outdoor space, as well as a simple system of recessed balconies that allow residents to take advantage of the outdoors. 4 Describe the zones of activity created by the proposal and compare those areas to zones of activity on adjacent and nearby sites. Response: The redevelopment will dramatically improve the current site conditions. Beyond the active residential use,the building will have a handsome exterior and site design that will provide a warm and welcoming pedestrian experience.The building will be positioned to visually define the street edge and supports the Valley View/Wooddale Small Area plan vision of incorporating a pedestrian-friendly link along the southern edge of the new development to the commercial activities to the West. Health Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves. 1 How does this proposal enhance key elements of environmental health (air,water, noise, habitat)? Response:The building will be designed to incorporate assemblies that ensure the highest quality acoustical and energy performance (wall and floor assemblies). Construction phase sustainable practices will include construction waste management and recycling. Finally, this project will incorporate energy-efficient appliances, low-flow water fixtures, low-VOC paints and building-wide recycling practices. 2 How does the proposal mitigate any negative impacts on environmental health on its own site? Response: Like most infill sites,the project is dense, located in an area that has adequate utilities and infrastructure. All parking for the residents will be enclosed within the building,and the building will be designed with outdoor space for dwelling units as well as common outdoor space for shared use. 3 How does proposal provide for a healthful environment beyond the current condition? Response: The project redevelops two existing sites that were previously used as a gas stations (one is now a hair salon)—both a vehicular-oriented land use. As a medium-density housing development,the project makes efficient use of the land area and is located within walking distance to many services that residents will use daily. 4 Describe ways in which human health needs are advanced by the proposal. Response:The building will offer its residents on-site care taker, indoor tempered parking, private storage lockers. Enclosed bicycle parking will also be provided within the building to encourage residents use of the nearby bike trail system. Innovation Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated problems. 1 Identify the problems posed by the proposal or the district requiring innovative solutions and describe the ways in which the proposal responds? Response: The proposed use is designed to meet the wave of the baby boomer demand over the next decade and create housing options for those families looking to live in Edina with maintenance free living. 2 Describe the metrics to be used to compare the innovations posed by the proposal. Response:The proposed re-development will offer current and future residents an option for new construction housing that is owned not rented but offers the ease of condo living with the neighborhood feel of single-family homes. 3 For those solutions posed by the proposal as innovative, describe how they might become "best practices" for the district. Response: Creating this type of housing will bring a vibrancy to the neighborhood that does not currently exist. This re-development will encourage more of this type of housing to be built in other areas within the city. 4 Describe innovations in systems and aesthetics and the ways in which systems and aesthetics for integrated solutions. Response: There are a number of design strategies that are critical for this type of housing. Key to it all is that it be located within a walkable community that integrates housing and commercial uses so that residents can integrate themselves into the larger neighborhood. 5 Describe other projects where innovations similar to those included in the proposal have been employed. Response:The co-developer has recently completed this type of project in St. Louis Park, MN. He has had great success with this type of housing, many would be residents have been asking for and Edina project. Land Use; Live-able Promote well-balanced aggregations of"come to" and "stay at" Precincts places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. 1 How does the proposal complement the mix of uses in the district? Response: The proposed development will offer a housing option for empty-nesters to stay in Edina and downsize their homes,acting as a catalyst to recycling the existing housing stock.This serves the baby boomer's growing desire to live in an urban environment, makes economic sense by offering new construction with the ease of condo living at a price point much lower than existing newer condo buildings,and provides a rich social experience.The market for this segment of buyer is robust.There is an avalanche of demand over the next 10 years as residents age into this type of housing, Currently,there is a shortage of adequate for-sale housing options in the City of Edina. 2 Describe the proposal in terms of"come to" and/or"stay at" places. Response:This residential community will offer various unit types for its diverse tenant profile,tailored to the active adult demographic in search of flexible luxury living. Unit types will range from smaller 1,500 sq.ft. units to larger 2,500+sq.ft. units.This variety in housing types will help to accommodate a variety of household formations, sizes and incomes. 3 What adjacent or nearby"come to" or"stay at" places does the proposal rely on for vitality? Response: The Valley View/Wooddale area,with its mix of uses and a vision for walkable streetscapes and a neighborhood feel, is highly desirable to prospective residents. The nearby public park, shops and restaurants within walking distance to the development are very important features and places that will ensure the continued vitality of the project. 4 Demonstrate the flows of activity generated by the site during a typical weekday and weekend day. Response: Future residents of this site will most likely be 50+years of age. Many will be retired;therefore,the anticipated weekday and weekend traffic will be less than a typical urban type condo building. The site is walkable to nearby amenities that will most likely be utilized by foot. Economic Vitality Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. 1 Describe the proposal in terms of its economic contributions to the district. Response:The proposed re-development will create a much higher tax base for the city. Existing single-family homes will see a rise in value, helping to promote the neighborhood. The property will be managed by a professional 3rd party operator when the project opens its doors for move-ins. 2 How does the proposal enhance development on adjacent or nearby sites? Response: The project can serve as a catalyst for other development in the Valley View/Wooddale area. A successful housing project at this site will give others encouragement to invest here because there will be a true mixed-use district. In addition,there is not enough of this type of housing stock in Edina and there are strong demand fundamentals. 3 What features of the site or district limit the potential of the proposal from being fully realized? Response: To the east of the site there is a distressed building that is under leased and poorly maintained. If that property is not redeveloped, it could have a negative impact on the eastern facing view units. 4 Why is the proposal best situated on its proposed site from the perspective of economic vitality? Response:The developers have done market research and have determined that many current and future residents want a neighborhood feel but would also like the ease of condo living. Small areas like this are the best way to create this product type. 5 How does the proposal make the district and the community a better place? Response: The project replaces a number of un-desirable property types;vacant land, un-occupied home, poorly maintained buildings with a vibrant residential community that will have a handsome exterior design and bring positive activity to this site within the Valley View/Wooddale area. Edina will be one of the first communities to offer its residents this type of housing option if this project moves forward. � a� G� u w z -, 0 -Ju < U I 0 _1 -$- ...$. • -I 3`.1 P.4." .-: ofirtylki — , , 7 — H i_u ......_ w ce_ _ .... H ..._ fti E .-- 1 U.- rICS.- ". . C 73..... ..... UJ 1:14.' ILIL &II': i C.° ei •,i„TV ME Mir '4744A ... .1 ••: - J I, 17.4L. .ii,.'41'i;•• .E_,I .e..._ :, f .,-.....i.•,,,-",„ - .....„ --•:-..:_q 77 -= .... -I wm, 11 num .1.1. umm 11 .nua . 12:10,.. ..,,,. , rr.--:! ::: "'"i • -4.44-N. .....„ I mujil"1 .9.111 =mu mu 1111 1 nolv`l uull -61111.1 --, lir :: •. ri .., 1111 :" Ir muii.i ea ,,,,..-,,,,, ammr-- /ET, Ns NIL lik-s..—.. ,..."" Eliza - [ =E.r .-...-..z...:1 glox-air! w, r --- I'm!: 1 =--7., ,,7, r- IPIONIIII sit440 -i 1,.. ..- ,.%.4.:,...... 1$.44175;44 •- (10) ul ..$. .:., r L- O w i -11111= UJ Z } Z w 7.;+„ .r o J O < .� I > P;r. w Z -• Q '' W s w Q 0 i. z p1 .--4.--=,.. 570 . ii ® ; 'Art a �. Li_ rt ��:� :sem_ ;Mit m�:� `. C — .miii• uJ • .111111116/11A OMNI 7 ElligiI V.. a -t —_ NNW i1----, - la:�lm lik wino 'i U ■ung „, en � e;^ Nom!. t v • u --- _no s.--- 11111111111111 . immuMS=111111111111111M ( <.-' IMP).._--...m: Ili' ''';Ear! S''.`4 ''''' :'::'' /f (_� rNSl 1 T ■ME1= Ss L. �, FIs; � =� I , 7 d a ,.!'" WOO* l i o \ N ` c-\___ (- -i ^ (1 •".-4-..„..4P.,,,,-,•-..74-'""t.t.-Vt4tt.,.. ---t."1,.'tnit.:"..,..._ •-,4„....y-'.- ---- .7,--;• •'• -,,,'''.,:tt'-`''-'*,:v.4,4,1.-4'-- 'A"---• ..,,,.4.u.- 'f•, f ,,, , 4-... .„. . . „ ,, ., „,i,s,„ ,,,t--:...,,,,,.,,,,::.;,..,,-„,,,,,,,ANs...•,,,,,kni.„4.44,,, ,, , _ ._ . z i - .; .I.*I.i; '; ' ''''''• CO ...6il'''' • , • , - 15 i I 4 1 i 1 i IF '4iiiitiiiiiiiir --."..'r'.--;'•...'.-:::-;.,t. f• -'-'7'. ----7--::___., .--,.•".' ; -. ..-.. .."'".:-”: I '';' ...... .:...„ .,.....„. . r ,,... '_ '.....,„1..............4 , .,'1 . U- :; -- --' MINN MI_9 ", ',•-•„., :,4 1 .E ..,•.,1 1 :.:. ••,,,i.', , UJ 1, likagi„,.. • ----- ..,,,,.,,:-::,;...';'*74.. L , .......... 'iiiii i=12 7" . . i. -....-: • - : •• - RE lig,' ',..,77,1:741f;- • !1 ] IIIIESE67i . : , -------1 ...'.•,-_,,.. ____ . ''-. 11... .111 .-,,-=---,-.-.,---------- .;-".-•-.;'-' !. ;. ........ ....,.. . ......... ... . . . ..., Ces ''--- . i.. . , .01...';,:. ... 7-/-- •„;:t t.....,11.:„i'..'.. Iiiifili•:,i'5' =I ,., 41141611'71 =IMRE , - . .,-,.,....... .V4 ...... .0.1 1 1.. . . - ..r '. 11iON:41 t., XEll-1 --71 IMIlli," ?-7-.---...",':',..,.'''.;.4. . . .=_.....i EMIE!;tg r="mj • \ .. . . ... . ....„..*,y, -,41.---- t' IMM.! . - , ....,,,.'...1111 le-- 'r,*";'4.7, --..- ' -4 4',7i4g41% :,:;4.ift'''ILI,I.,-;.,----- -1•/''.',..f f,. , f 4' 1 : r\i". 0 ., . . .. ,.. (1) 4.1,..,...4711...Ntw„,....,„ .' .._. .,...-..,.., .,.. Z Q _E) w ,_. 1 o i i o 1 CO , II 1.-- .— --------t PZ. .. ,p N u f4 " LA chi . 3Ab NMdlibO ..;;;,...;"•:,'-- ", m i +' . l is m i H� m ep i F i ` ,wt ,;; .S�9ai�a''fs1 ,. C y } iz // r E Y., M h • l 7- ....-)e 7....) i i,• �\ /, � ]AV OOO113Ul ./' ''t --..„ .. ,) ..__-- I� a vitaLL. I { (: ggg4j am' j: ñj1 ''pf) / �� f;"j rrn �.:.) I ® o ,' N\ co ) N.; N. o th...) 0z 4-1 c _CU LL c CO w C w 1 1 ml--lir II3 -- El g ' 11m �. II , a ( 10 it! J. IX•' % III •• o :,oriV.II I all, I Aill al : 1 1 m n, s � I�-"' gym m w �� m 1 = =-8 1 1 oz 141 - :14 2 N -- V o �Ir r »i M a{ . • m� c n I 3 0 co Ti. 15U D D D D a o00 o00 U u � d CO I bb 1� n �p m� � � d II a � o— o 0 m� L E I 4 j °o 0 - it kiii,Q1 a noi, u. IP c i ❑ ' /' .,_,r,”,.l“; 9 9 I -L_NOW O �D 1 nF V) z ca .- Co co w LLl 0 0 f I PA�l IIl, 111 I O a , ,______ J.!ltiori, ,, 0 p _p Fmo _i• v rt - MECH II f U \ P. ® 7 OCNEPBFHCH OCHE lirl v j El. N O ®� •o — N x .— 11 1: '`7S7 H �000 3 ,at* m 1 ° E'r�* moo s Winommoi Ov =� �i s. �� 0 o; n .. . � L... a w� N 0 nOrf) A _ al nor:, 5 [a Q� .O Qd acrd Q` �Q ID- 0 1 1 LL N L o (f) z 4.1 N c N O 15 y I'q Tr a3 W U N N C Tr M 'Q N M w N b C C 60 y R d E a = o co co o 0, d Z 0 0 <>ocr° ,,,,, L_ 1 -go I I : Grp El M ' P 1 L'. i E L...,1 �� ifh i‘: II o at.. 2' 17„ ,, tv_, ®® o . aitt / , El i 3 ri — 17101 d4 :, b b it _ C9 e 1 \ 0 - X11 E now ._ tt.-4//J I. a' a La'!II aG g � ' 7 tat Eal 1 • 1 w r �__k ! / 1‘.. - .4/-1 i t ow d ....___.W * --, 1",* 4174 8 rip M �A 111111111111 MOMIb U9111 ® IS ei” 1: = I. a IF v C 7 O O' N C 7 O o 0 a� � _ E E o O_' Q ` o O c O E E I. o 2 m N e� li z ca LL c CO w N co • AmmEriki Cf) I CO N. 0 o rn111 CO m 0 r N r r U a a E 0 n C Y o CO a d CD p e m NW'VNI03 z L6fSS NW'tl1t2AtlM -°e g �'Bueuoe LW N33ii000llifOd 64ZZ 1NJWdO13A4 iiiii 4 I i ^ o 1- 4026461,LBS'LSM U)OZLB-LMS'LSM OLISS N Vvotl eoQe SZSC seal v F$ $ ~ NILLM all 'S3112i3dO�ld W(11NIWOaN00 U •au1'6ui.aaw6u3 �� � � m � o UOSJB1 3SflOH3IVO suv vNIa3 '; =H� 11 im a o .0 a _xa:s„ a - € $ Td111W8f1S 1110 P2 2 i' _ Jay f i^ A s $ X e 6 Rsa'. $o: . ; g i tg 8wG w@e ` ©zi wm : 2 2 2 € o sgi LT, o 0 o u2 2 2 o2 � � ge=s 6i8w 8F wIi � F £ Iw w9 9 9 GoR - w _ w w w E E w w 'L3- €g; 3 e W2 'rn ii wrc _i . - 6 w 9 d 9, 9 9 6' 9 Z Fass sg Cw Y' 80 _ ?_ 8 8 8 8 ,2 8 8 8 8 EXEE Z if.; —I ` I—0 5' 5f 9.w 9 9.w Y wg w w 9 c a=€ab `g s $a if �. ` Y O O 0600000 0000 o �� I 3 • r 3AV NMVIAVO '1r . -.)_ ]i i " •' I, •i / I „/ 3 Jj ° 1 W a1iiiiF / i / W eLAL z ii I 6 ::,01;// / / / _ 'lt,`a r / j /. .......:......... . ... mi / .�J.4/ ,. / / , / / / /. / / /. N / / a a 0_ 0 , r — — — — — — — — — T . . 01,3 't:�—�a �— 7' / a a is " :xL0 a \.L i _ I /I 1 O / ii © , off app ,— /3 /� / ° " / 6 iii% ° ,: !/,.i.//,'-'9/ 7, ., .!iiii l. ,,Ai. 1 .4084:1!..4,1111117-0 /v.„,t . i , ° "7 €A I 1 I / / ° o °° a '1 ° I o e 'o.: ' ' o iii I / y j / / NW'VNI03h 1,6£94 NW'VIN:2MM -1 -1 A-1 g p LOU'191'159U10Z16'L9/'1S9 N33in00112JOd 64ZZ 1N9Wd017A7Q `c1YE= iz N 01195 NW••,[1.1.[K1..An �arB. 00 neoa e,ogel Disc all 'SDI1H dO2Id 2k€,g; w' Fos ZN V -DUI`6111100 U!6 U3 W n I N I WOd N 00 s z fig`"s. ° ¢w uos a �SfOHlVO SD/1J vNICIA and y g� $ L� P EFS Fa l €EI ° i 1dlliwans Alla a L'I: `P 0', 0 0 2 Jzzm zzm - B- z w 2 w 1n w tij z a ;' >z - 3AV N1NVINVO a. � - - , /►/ o / =�� 1 ,' 1/ `44p a, gi i if , /, M A // / 11.1 L / J' / / / /. / i / i / / / / CL a' / / / /. a '.... 1a is l I a is ... ; I 3AV OOOI(3x. < .'-d.„ d /�' /. 1r,- ,- % / —.' ____T I 1' __ r _l___ % / / r--- 1- �_� r— ---=ll B�f — i_ /7 / 0 gmg I I e g r g I rI ' / /� ,/ /. I m .. I lit 'i 14; it q� I I Oe %// / i I s ' I �i i' 15 it 11 1 u I I I Egg9 I �! / / titi t z rr ` ,r� � I/ ai./ i /o / / F L L-II m I 61 1 1,—I L u 8 I / / P: ¢ /; / II----rf -1=s=s=—L.� -aIF- —� _ 's II s I I LL g 'Ir—x I / �- / / g II ryII ii . 1 � ' , / ✓- L L / J/ / /(./ / is ;aux.sy.0.v-34 6mmeadur...mtaeC) u I,6ESS NW ViNW VNIC2 V7AVM la g .......,.., ass rsoal 001.1 n .a0d6Z INDV\ld01ACI Atitgp4 ; I 9g tLeo lS9(1)mg Let lS9 qi-ii 0. t= (.1 8z Cu') P..21,togti erse all `S3112:1d0Hd MININOON00 t'Eglii `g ,, .A1 gz, 0 .3.,,6.,.....0.3 Ei hfril t; ,, m „iv a uosil esnopoive SiVid VNICIA l'ilg ! ' Hu Lcr, iviimns Aio 9 g q u .i .,- 1 1 4 1 OM 5 8 8 8 ,... i'J!Lg' kgiT g rre) ? 'AgOW 18 5; A. g ° 1=t Ho[]...... i . Noi : 0 rg2 4 ' 2 it 1 L.! §§ z iict ii g • E alt li . z g w , 1 • g ul it t 1 At 0 , w , , ' 22 i. ?a1 : 'E E El 11 V t 'E ' EE '2 ! 'E '.4; :--itn 1 118 ;; iip18 i t i li ,_; li 2_12 It 211,iil 1 ; 1 22 1- 20 1 8; 0, :1 Di 1; 11f!il i ! t 0 ii 11! i 8 88 !- !, .; =-87 . t' S ,:g .01 J. ii I - O 11 ti Wi 1 .2" 1,12 22 di 1,; mip_al .i $ a --;, lillIg O ! .‘A 3 it, 13 IF4 II ) 20 1.8 'LI; ;I ;1;211 22 2 co 11 is 'i' if , 10: :f1 .,12 10 f„.0.2 Lli g V as li ii 41 gt 4 2;§ P. 2 2g; n £53;!g ;1 is Ito-I /- 32 27 2.. ia 1 agg 22t ti [2: la tot:gt2 g, j 2 _1 =i ,1 t ;j? _71 li 3i- 2/ A f:252141- ;! g E r o "5 '': "' = ta §Z•n i " VI 12,21,12" jj 1 4 '3AV WAVIIIVO CC 11' 1^ 1 - 12 -.2 Ft* 2. ‘, ..-g2. , 2: 1 i 1 i_ , 1 5 T I I '. 1 - ' FE 501..ge 15 ,. igi 13 ra2 15 e Ff2 :2; Ift ilF 4, i341E.i 3! 11 o hi 11 3;! !I "; Iii fli 1•1! ji!,2 2i, e, z2, i ! 0 p. ,I I.§ ,; ,, 2F2 Jai iii -2' t; •fl2;11.; ti 23 , z Jit 2- i" tE i "1 j2' .^4 !,:1 ".1'!“ P ,, 0 tig .1 .P. 37 3 128 21 gt i' i 1 'di \,' L /1;k7 // / 1i I i 10 ';:: - 1 1 _ ./.4.,:// , . 1 liOg !flik' ! !ill ii w / : ,•/' / 1 / it 1.: ill 1, 1 ti ig:is 1•2E"; ; ' Jo; gE u) ,5,524 E. 4, gf. 28.5 "" • ei ig:2; g / r / i,2".- 4 tsili z 0 it 11 fg! 11 1 0 1!0; 1 ,• P-J .1; 1. III it: 1 1! gfill !, Etifl i'! ;!! iii , ,/ / ri lit8F PO; :i 2;2 iS1) 5. 152 .F g. g5 .5.82 2i52.222. 8. 25; 558 , 2/ e2/ , ,1 tg lit 2811: "'"vii". 2 12 IP Ili L..... .1-424 -,/ / / / i II! 2E-1; .:41,1i! i 4,1 Li , / / / gikEr ..,,, CA -,y :. 0 v6 g2.2 -g. g. b Fs bt tilt tt 11; g1htta i 3, 2!; :Z. , ' i / / 0 t; fl 11” ass!! i11 ili! ATM! ,1 0 II' ii / z 11. it AP H- 2/Et22 82-E-1-4 2 t'l Ft ro , / / / 2 E2 12 013 A ii 22 11 1.0;1;8 3 .25 gi " / / / . / FA :t 21 UP. t! 12 1! iaAlt 'gt10,1 - a P; ii; , . ° D. li nr% H q 7.71 ;ii;l'i MIMI.' 11 1 aii - ...7,,2.1./ 1,1 / / cc _ _ w / / / . F 2 F / , )2 0 < / i t i / / • Z 3SVHd Q_ t e.: / / / — — 2/5.711.,: 7/ / 10 10 10 -I I g, i •,_ 1 (•,_ ;.2: • i g„ 1 L - ' i - "I' , — • ----------- ---- ----- --'7inniiiraMMINIONliiM6:-- . / i / -4 . --- r I _ _. ---1.41.-_,_ ! ,—-,T_, / - 1 .7.17 '"---!--;:f!-H, 1——J7— cil —1.7-77 ,,,'Al,/ // / A [iiirti M I. 7 1., I ''1 I,1'•I r:t ,. I L. - 1 . , / / 7/ , 4?st- 1,„1,1 :41 i 1 1 1 1,,e.i, r,1 `‘a '41111 14 0 li, L-12-h ' ,/ P. Z-.. P 1 0 5--, t; k ;1 ii—L,, lk%;i „ --- II „ g :i 2g.: I,. / ii.K/ / l' / I ' T ,TTegg 7 /// / r- '-- --'---1-5 *it)//I / 59 i' -W A / Et ki :4 / ,, ,. // : :-----4— „/ / / 1 Fr ii ----oto.-4ili 1 oi2i f.,-,,,' k(!,, ,,4,,,yi-i -r, ' ' [,-; / U / / 4/ ; / il t ,' /q/ 7 / ,,)' ! ,:, 4' ; ,' r fi 4, , ,3' , ,,/ i , / // i 6.60.644 w,0,6010060..L60601LOY 0 Bi 3 L6ESS NW'tll`dZAVM NW VNI03 Is g z N332i`J 00112iOd 6/ZZ "f"£Pg 41 17Z846.1S9 U)«,6,�L� 1N3WdOl3/�3a s �`y 1 MISS NW'44914,49 4444. <,8 C d 444414,441•Zt[ dll 'S3I12AdO21d WfIINIWOCINOO $a€:g= w. F6 B 0 uosae� 3Sf1OH31VO SIVlJ VNI43 °054. T ff P 15 0,..,�aa _ s;g% f 1V1IIIN fS 1113 8 osg 1.s I a sE. .tm 1,0 081 © ., Booz= g s 111 F$ 8 87 R 10 3:1 8 ;1i1 Z z uo<rNi 'Ag� $' - 8 _ g1! NaS i o 072' iwWczhfi`3o ill 2£ s$ $ € log g$a g - t @�;s o mIi � � Ili ll L I,. 1 o ge9 in,hvf $ ; ,,, >rw '$7 g32 eE I = v" 2VP 1" -!.k R_27 oIFI €Ee %7 1 65 8- r 'i1 IDI 3 9t Pn.; �° 8aF `i .s as if § 4 e ae e e a g q 12:f 11 III !ft _ sx 7g Il 5 I!! !0! ili: 7 B b ash€^ co s `.Sys $ ig Eg t g xS$ €1! 2 - 89 „gg7o W sal: ILI fit io of € 41 !Sita g 8 F g: iE:€a 8 F.. 7. _ q§ $ a [[ 's aI €vitt Z $ o 53 52 6= �� F 77y to, a � ^fie?� 8E$ 8 @ @ 8 8g I ® V e. $ = F suis lig g 8 i4 9° si ,888 6 E qi=m t3 oi J F ig 11y t ((3 I N p$ rZ a S H E '78 rg .o N$ xa z fsaS >'i" < h <BcE� Z 00000VI00 w w ; N €li - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - r J 1 '=1 .Nmn ( A1, 1 7177-7 LarzAr' ' _ Iy/ r : a ti`, o 0 I w I wx, 1 �r - / / 1 g= ?s* ^y / // Mii I P/1, /. / ul gyp":- - Y � EL$ 4 / / / / / / / / / /. N — =-0 > / /. W W ?: GT / //,, /Ja/ I I w` w / / / -a is is .____- i� ..._,a is is �: I zit I ,. �>./ � —11 / // !!---i—k---=--1 r t}�� —LI �/\. P/ /� I � Iso � I I ' 7 w� 14 /I �'w �8 I .yee /fix // / / / g 8 II 5�LL I �I I? I'r��: p I� "-S"��. I oo'm�a .8r ri i ,/\ / E F e li Imo_ moi_ I m� 8: ��aLL. o ps /li /% / 0 8 1 tis r'lsrt--1- 1i tan ii p �� 83 $aB 1/o // / �.._ I pi �o 880-�; ,¢i iiL,L a �ai> 0 ` S / i~---r1d_1=_4 lin klii, -- ,, - -zC-zz <Y ,/. /; / 3 11 t I Fm F v I 6 3r W / I` m �—,I IIF II �"� �� ��u`a f, �� N ''\�:8� / P : kms' V h 1+ ar.is. / ,I!w / / I l / L._-_--.�k L--=' - F ���....! iii %\ �7 .o �8a ... - ' 9 /< L. tea$ "8$ I �#33 s$ 7, $ ;i /' / rx F,8 / /,'/ _ / F 4a / 1 / 4 Y, r%/ / // / / a 1 1 m 10 I g $ L _ $m — ; W — /n i € e s 117 �p m W W re € F z � ff;1;= a $ z a '1 N i Eli.€�s�%�se 1 E€ e r o • o € o €¢ ��$8�; ' 0 a, i it i� i D 0- to I 3 W § ««lint 0 �` e N s c Z .5 filgs'3s'u- 16 k� •`2 a,2 "E U m p . 14W 8mm isOi s l; B gg s 8 te U a b SMM11 ;II t; gl 0 N p_ L i NI o I J —1 0 ,,,., fin NT NA1b'7YN0- x_ . r,r,......_, ,, ; ,.„; ,x/.11 ,.. ; k., civm xF �.`... - / o id / Maiddi' .0.0.84.0 I I I I O 'f, I / 1 11 : 11 's I1I1 ma 1 ) % II moi{ (• y''.. / i �$�* m x (.I .. / / .��-. -. wT.� ,,..a., �t - -- / / / "�'j,6'S` )A. .7" / / / 4a / i % li / / a / /, // I j // Z' '3/1 V 090773Y --- , �{ } rw04'28E 3.0100.005 -- ® Millh % 1 I y- 1 s -----''� g Ef 1r 8 6 7 i� 8 ilii .1 I' o c - 1 a .i S�� 1 ' i,` e 1 ym.a,„-- 1 <_. m k. . Li O� / u , c , � •�, c iy' & i / z;i s`••� gg, , =ten / %/�,\ /i Art 1 a +°; I ' \ ? /:- y g•' f- !___ r. _ 4: a $� , fii'( //—__ ELL6ZM.SZ.LOOON '♦ E E i E F / //• �8 / / / '/ / .e 026k,A, 6u,Fv^B / / / z kk 0 § Wa . / 2 CD (! ; § ; /( a W-O ;; (O.0 co F— }§k 0 2%0z B !|§ 2(§ \ kee! � !�: ) §((! N in\ \in to 0 (�+� ~ } \§}} k}g\ \ 00\)\/ 0 © !2? [g`eee I w \! \)\ k}\\}\ I— �§$ §a±;2¥ 2 z ° o W 0 )Gl2sm 00W .. o« § }K} \(( (\\\jj/ a k ! ! ■ *� �`� a f| k.a) 0 !\f , § A = \(k f 8)k ■IF §;! k-2R - /gym,-Q f2E!§ � a LLa C w d 0 m @ m •\\ 2,zr C I§a 5», 7 NE| 0 qw a.n 4) O a� 0 0 U 0 �J I I i 8 I I I I I I • I I II � J �J r 4 x aN g: . I m p I o Cco II L1_ -oc W LLI U 0 N U) c0 C! sl 'OF!'Cwg� 0 sew k( Cl)® 12 b 1-C1 § _ G § W >w co _ ! §( \/ _ b nD Z.Q - b V § § \§ § ° . k CO 5¢ < k[ 2 P `` § \,7ƒ- («Q a§: \ nil \} ; g g s!g e . §. § < \ y° \ ? O . ~ Amok � .�_ » 2 . \ . ƒ\ » . 0pi; C \ ` !\ ^\ ® T3 ) \ «\ w ` . . :\ \j w , a «\ . t ! , . . , . ) [ 2 \ y ' } 7 : £ . 3 ® d 0 < m : a. . . . . . . . . . . . . . n e , . . . n . . , . . . . , ,v e . , , �` / %. . [ .. - 0 -8 §§�) f 2 g;!# • 2- E rill O70 kn a 74 ct a \ 12 to o \( }\ - m 11.7.1 19 §\j — o k ! . ` • §E §� w w |k �( \ T 03 ° / 03V e«o ` . ../..,' \2 r •V. o 119 ki r \ , laia � . Cill` . . . . a , iu \ O § .,a . 2 ): \\ \ ^ � / ±9 -0 w . . . . d Eo g 2 . co . . . «® 1:i'w \io §=\ . `!• 22l E■§6 O 2<10 (I) 0,2 1,4r3A.44.,,'OCa A0 lII f' 4 O/ o DATE: September 20, 2017 TO: Edina Flats, Owner and Development Team 4416 Valley View Road CC: Cary Teague—Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE - Director of Engineering Charlie Gerk, PE—Graduate Engineer RE: Edina Flats, 4416 Valley View Road — Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Civil drawings dated 8/25/2017. Details 1. A Developer's Agreement or Site Improvement Performance Agreement will be required for construction of public sidewalk and utilities. a. Deliver as-build records of public infrastructure post construction. b. Plat public easements or transfer fee ownership of dedicated public right of way. 2. Parking ramp entrance walls should include provisions for safety fence. Survey 3. A proposed site survey is required. a. Show all easements, public and private. 4. Apply for vacation of existing easements if needed. 5. Describe easements or transfer dedicated outlets for public sidewalks not located within the rights-of- way and any public utilities. Living Streets 6. Provide sidewalk connection from outwalk to Oaklawn Avenue at 4404 Valley View Road to Valley View Road (similar to the existing condition). 7. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. 8. Sawcut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks per Edina standard plates. Traffic and Street 9. Maintain sidewalk access or provide sidewalk detour during construction as approved by the City. 10. Clearly denote private sidewalk. Maintenance for non-public sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. I I. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. 12. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Consider truck overhang when proposing plantings. 13. Street patches following utility connections shall follow standard plate's#540 —#545. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371•Fax 952-826-0392 A9 /4v9ii"""1:r,'I,. RN1 I O X7 Sanitary and Water Utilities 14. Verify size, location, and condition of existing sanitary sewer services prior to connecting to public sanitary sewer main. Review findings with city prior to making new connections. Use of existing sanitary sewer connections is preferred. 5. All unused sewer and water services shall be capped at the main and removed to the right-of-way line. 16. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. 7. Clearly indicate private vs public utilities. 18. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 19. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer's engineer. 20. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. 21. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with public works. 22. Separate meters for fire and domestic services will be required. 23. A SAC and WAC determination will be required and Met Council and City REC fees will be calculated from the determination. 24. If proposing wet tap, please note existing pipe is an older cast iron pipe at 85 psi. Storm Water Utility 25. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report. 26. Evidence of watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed is required for building permit. 27. Remove trench drain to western ramp, model surface overflow to ensure no overtopping into underground parking on either ramp. 28. Retaining wall on western ramp should be designed for extended saturated soil conditions due to nearby water infiltration feature. 29. Take soil borings and certify that groundwater or water from infiltration feature will not circulate to western ramp sump pump. 30. Parking ramp entrance walls and nearby grading should be designed to keep drainage out. 3 I. Retention system engineer required to verify construction of the underground retention systems done per plan. 32. Confirm retention system is structural designed for Edina's 80,000lb fire truck load and outriggers in parking lot or drive lane areas. Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 33. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site permit is required. Other Agency Coordination 34. Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit is required. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 7450 Metro Boulevard•Edina,Minnesota 55439 www.EdinaMN.gov•952-826-0371' •Fax 952-826-0392 �-L 1 WENCK File #3022-08 September 15, 2017 DRAFT Traffic Impact Study for Edina Flats in Edina, MN Prepared for: 4801 W. 50th Street City of Edina Edina, MN 55424 Ilr^ Prepared by: WENCK WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center ASSOCIATES Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Responsive partner. Fax: 763-479-4242 Exceptional outcomes. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 5-1 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1 7.0 APPENDIX 7-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 4-4 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE 5-5 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE 5-6 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. DATE: September 15, 2017 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 September 2017 i VA v WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT ✓fT 1 .0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed condominium development called Edina Flats located in Edina, MN. The project site is located on the north side of Valley View Road at Kellogg Avenue and Oaklawn Avenue. Based on direction from City of Edina staff, this study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development on the following intersections: • Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue • Valley View Road/Kellogg Avenue • Valley View Road/62"d Street • Wooddale Avenue/61st Street • Kellogg Avenue/61St Street • Oaklawn Avenue/61st Street The proposed project will involve the construction of 18 new condominiums. Three existing single family houses and a hair salon building will be removed and replaced by the proposed condominiums. Access for four of the condominiums will be provided with a driveway on Valley View Road west of Oaklawn Avenue. Access for the remaining fourteen condominiums will be provided with a driveway on Valley View Road west of Kellogg Avenue. The project is expected to be complete by the end of 2019. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 5 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 4 net trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 56 net weekday daily trips. • Traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at these intersections to accommodate the proposed project. • Under existing conditions during the p.m. peak hour, the westbound through and right turn movements at the Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection operate at poor levels of service. This results in a vehicle queue that extends east to 62"d Street. This condition does not occur during the a.m. peak hour. Additional consideration should be given to operations at this intersection to determine if changes to the intersection control are appropriate. • The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on pedestrian and bicycle operations in this area. The number of trips generated by the proposed project has minimal impact on operations at the nearby intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle operations. September 2017 1-1 y v WENCK A Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed condominium development called Edina Flats located in Edina, MN. The project site is located on the north side of Valley View Road at Kellogg Avenue and Oaklawn Avenue. The project location is shown in Figure 1. Based on direction from City of Edina staff, this study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed development on the following intersections: • Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue • Valley View Road/Kellogg Avenue • Valley View Road/62nd Street • Wooddale Avenue/61st Street • Kellogg Avenue/61st Street • Oaklawn Avenue/61St Street Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve the construction of 18 new condominiums. Three existing single family houses and a hair salon building will be removed and replaced by the proposed condominiums. Access for four of the condominiums will be provided with a driveway on Valley View Road west of Oaklawn Avenue. Access for the remaining fourteen condominiums will be provided with a driveway on Valley View Road west of Kellogg Avenue. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The project is expected to be complete by the end of 2019. September 2017 2-1 ♦ ♦WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT ASI Ik\-- 11-......J01-. ji tijorl H n?.._1. ,IL,4:71j i\Z-2' - I----11 f „......._ . - i „/„,:.,.„,8 .• ,.._.„,... ,.....,o, _______,..,,_____ _____, WOODDALE ,,<*,IZt ,,,,,----- <?., 8 1 '.14. k•-•'(.1' 1 , -P ,--- ,"-- c.0".4 -) 1 •C) c\ PCIT\'-- WOOD D4( ? `--.--( ttzt----,- ',• < c., .1-- 0 .4 1 CL EN,' _z z -.z L-:, W.j 52nd ST. - ---›. W.52nd ST. ''• \ l(-- c.; 1 TII7N R24W it.20 !\t\\\\ P f_.3t I 8 I 7 Zs --, W. 53 rd ST.. ''j\ t...1 --. --IT-- ; •ti I., 14/e'S'CY 1 00 \ r-Li . (//,',,,, 7,..., , ,,,, (3- NMO9R ST. \ . ,st; a W , / -* < 1 C-1 > Z .1 1 ,,i/ I I I I 1 I 11 < s \›.....yv. 54th 1 .4b: ST. _II _i______I _II ,c-I-•-...a' C.sH MOND\I GOLF TER. `5.-I1 _ -o c,.. `...I- k------c) -TirIII• II I i--\---- " i r-- ,.., .1 r),,,v,...„,:\, if.../-' FU R -71-----L-L--E-r--s-f-:--- - -/' • --— ------.12 0-1 L' il.40A K Il_DR. , vv. 55 rt.t.„ ,sci.>i).,-c:,22:440. 'ix. --1:.!,,,i`-(7.2.:1.5..ctItliI .,‘,,5,(73:1,0_, Li:58EtBArci:as::•/55=t AVE. <Ng ST. -2'vv, !„.)•!--;-' Tr L. C.), L____________I L.,..1 cr ___...--, ,.., (...., Cv : ILEXING[TON AV E. - < DE' ,4) C. •11u.t k' \ > o, Act.,-,IT'. -")-1p. ! . -,- , W. Y1,,,,,i;0-INNE TER. W,, IND RD. . I ---- - ' ----------,iy., -z.61.1-3 • 11 .,_.\-:: .,, ', 1 ..—• _ — ,z u..1 [-----Fc ,.., 56th T?-,„-T__,17 ST.11---7c:)o 1 / 1 \1„..„, 24 > L---1 > kk•- 0 ‘__Ji----- - _ j3-.---\, ,,,,, -ST. OODL 4,,,v , V ,„.„! e• '7! u] ° .(RDii J (i,-,,,,e'--,--:91 . . . . . z)uTHvID;11--Rrr:°wER j '11----gA"` -1(7'6' ''''''' 1 W. 57th CONCORD '!I!-'-? ›. ------- -, 1 .1 PHILBROOK LN. \ • to Li C \\\,, -TER. 'iI? ST. i 1 it h ST. - `1.,..t I1 I tl: Iii: .i SI- ,!.\\ W• i - ----ii 58thi 71 -- I t_ I.`j AVE.1 4,\\I--;'`.;,I! ‘41 i.l'I! o '2t/-) (IIIII 11 ; [ IES •:a--- aTI''-'`..,,s,..St ge.....2 uj I W. ‹, i r— ____ -,. ,......... .1 Yri. 59 th ST. W. I 59 th s As's,,, i 0 _ Z — = _ ST. a . 59th ST. .... I %'"•4 1 z n w ,,,I ST. Iil t' CCHF) IIIRD I ,.... 0,.,, _di. • <tt 0 Y Lt. C 1-: W. 0 60 th o ....1 ST. 8 PROJECT LOCATION ._,-.) 60 th — TER I - r cti i V,..E,E,----R ST. I W.:------;"-------) co t---I 1/ .4 ° \''''''X) 100i "/ --‘-.1 L,-L--....,„__,VIEg -) l'• ``,.,:- W. ,,,-- -:. ,,./„.... ,,\?:;;•1 I !I\ ,,,,/,, 4,11 4 .ri Lj ‹,,../1",://AC' / 1 -i \-4' 1 - r.) /77-- i44 < cu Wry( C'',//".:77 \:;•-"4-!::\,_!.1 ' / [ \,. a, \ 411 ' ' -' ' P f ' ' '. > ,r W. 6? rid ST. [-----' 4,-„,!'...._,1_2_32..=_...,„,„,,,,;.•c_ ,,,,,D , 62 nd S7A,T. <1,..„-s„..!.. ____,...y.o, ' ss ss• '',",'' th ST• \\\L i k,„:5„,;,•••• ,..6. Li)-. -...... , - , <,.., ‹r ci) I Li Li ":1, \\--;,'''' '‘'!‘---''''>'t-•:,...,3S' cr F1c-, „I .7 0 0 W - a. _, 1 czt-•:;!;:2;'"II ''',-It'''-, > '--. > - • ,.... '-1.-.-,..„t.,'-,....,-••.'s----, z -I,-) .„.„..v, I-•:- cr -4 I V;!,!•!/ -....1 .4 cc , zi t(ii-II 62 ap W.O 64 t hi ST• ('t. --- ,;',., 7 -''''''''''7/1; ---ir Li O[ . -3 W 21 :L.?' ..,.i '`; ..''',1 - ---— `,.'•--'7'-'7-:''t'''..t.". ''I.''\'..- 1'...„1_,_i• I . L.) 01 „. ,..... /al! .1 1- Ltti CP r--\\,,,\ .1 1 ,,-6-3)cr.w .,, ,. . ke ,L., co c., 1--1 cc .!., \\*-7 W. 66th z,...y .____.u- '--- ST*_, ---,-;,'L.,' 6th ST. !!!) IF v, , cc <-...nt:3, “ COL 7-=,-.3 r-711.7=173 EL,..1..........—2.1t3z7- .., ----,•vr?,,--' _ ..... 7 _21 .. 0 . FC.:4, ,f,,,,,,, -,,„\n,‘,-,„, ,!!: 1.11.-cir,/letict `I! 11) _, ; 0.., ...\ N \. )- o \ u'l i APPROXIMATE SCALE ?,(,,>' ,,.. , z C. ., k_ \ r a2---' -- . 0: cp - .,r t , - ..8i t h 1.116,11 !!)-,-. 7-;!- 'I.°49 `,I-?, A •!::.--, °R.* 1F2 ROYCAR Vs I , cc c.______ --k ,,,..,66 _,/1.0 FP-TV-T CV M i Thr-il I LFANZ "'-- BA '9-ti ST. ;EI nr - -- 'n o 1400' VAIPV A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 1 WENCK FOR EDINA FLATS , IN EDINA, MN PROJECT LOCATION Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. .r 411111111111111111111M DRAFT A ca• Z /--N ( ) 041 < (1).-Th _ ,._...._ _____. '/-.....:: 3AV NW.V1,00_,', 0 i— LL U) -- i I ,.„......-.„ ..........._ ; 1 - tE ' . , , i} : •1 ' - „ ' / . . ; ----. I- F- (.3/''. 0< z i. (...) u-„,,' . ) - CL Z Z .... / 2 6 Ei -LE /7 ,7 ‘e” / 4,... § Li- ,....., . . . , 3AV 000113N ,' ) 7- '--,\ • ri___• • .4.1___4 II. : 4 • •.•,_ -i--.,._ __ _, ...„•.. `,/ ' •litt'.I VI:• •-likr-• • 1L • 1 -.-I I , / ,./" ,' - -.„), , .....„ ; I , -... ..i... . i• - -- .. . L .. ..,, .... ..-1..r.„.7 _.,,,:, ,• i' .„,.., . a (, :,: ' :' / li ,, . , ,..... , . ..., ,„ . It) ' "q"..;'. CO CN ' , , ‘ '' -'''''", bc Z :4 W 1° , ,.,...., , 7; ,,,....._, /tc:.17) , .._ -7.2\ Z 41111101111MI DRAFT 4 .----3 3 .0 Existing Conditions The proposed site on Kellogg Avenue currently consists of three single family homes and a surface parking lot. The proposed site on Oaklawn Avenue consists of a hair salon building and parking lot. Near the site location, Valley View Road is a three-lane local roadway. Wooddale Avenue is a two-lane undivided north/south roadway. Kellogg Avenue, Oaklawn Avenue, 61st Street, and 62nd Street are two-lane undivided roadways. Existing conditions at the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on all approaches. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches consist of one shared left turn/through/right turn lane. Striped crosswalks are present across the east and south legs. Valley View Road/Kellogg Avenue This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound Kellogg Avenue approach. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach consists of one shared left turn/right turn lane. A bike lane is provided on both sides of Valley View Road. Valley View Road/62nd Street This three-way intersection is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound 62nd Street approach. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach consists of one shared left turn/right turn lane. A bike lane is provided on both sides of Valley View Road. Wooddale Avenue/61St Street This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the eastbound and westbound approaches. All approaches consist of one shared left turn/through/right turn lane. Kellogg Avenue/61St Street This four-way intersection is controlled with stop signs on the northbound and southbound approaches. All approaches consist of one shared left turn/through/right turn lane. Oaklawn Avenue/61st Street This four-way intersection is controlled with yield signs on the eastbound and westbound approaches. All approaches consist of one shared left turn/through/right turn lane. Turn movement data for the intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in August 2017. September 2017 3-1 V V WENCK A Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT 454 0 w M Q cn i� GAy MO OOJ `7 Q cn it :.- u x .4 ., '�. i I ' 0 t 4 O d w '- F.. s t71:.: i o w. ➢ '' -: 0 - - ..>.,,:. r €f M U t Z " :Air r ` !i W Z --- , „{_:1,._V ,Ite 1 --- , . i ' :r. ,.i o x . .E / 1 'f'.., . ..4. ,paw Z ,.,.. ' : ' '1 a . 1 a } ....4 .r P Y co J Z • a QQQ d. ZZ lL x • env 66011eN , I h- s* Q a ' , <'!_ ma I x„ 0 1, 1 t T T"a i ' . ,, rt(, - n ,.... Ne /L .T, VS,La N 1 . ,H ` p; , -?._..... �' ',r I Z8 eAy ajeppooM ^ ` ' {7. Lip d • + ' � ,- • f 1 , f .., r , • I a.c Z .411Nom DRAFT AS-S- 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2020. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2017 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses currently on the site. • 2019 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2020 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth in the area. • 2019 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2020 No-Build volumes to determine 2020 Build volumes. In addition, existing trips generated by the uses currently on the site were subtracted from the total volume. Trio Generation Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the existing and proposed developments were calculated based on data presented in the ninth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project Weekday Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed Project Condominiums 18 DU 2 7 9 6 3 9 105 Existing Uses Removed Hair Salon 1,400 SF (2) (0) (2) (1) (1) (2) (20) Single Family 3 DU (1) (1) (2) (2) (1) (3) (29) Net Trips (1) 6 5 3 1 4 56 DU=dwelling unit, SF=square feet Table 1 shows the net number of trips generated by the proposed development including reductions for existing trips. As shown, the project adds 5 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 4 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 56 net trips daily. September 2017 4-1 11Aptv WENCK A Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 40 percent to/from the east on Valley View Road • 30 percent to/from the west on Valley View Road • 10 percent to/from the east on 62nd Street • 15 percent to/from the north on Wooddale Avenue • 2 percent to/from the north on Kellogg Avenue • 3 percent to/from the north on Oaklawn Avenue Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. September 2017 4-2 '/tV WENCK A mernum Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT F to co 2/2/2 N � � E-4/4!4 N N N o a t-o/oJ0 2/2/2 a-a �2/2J2 0 03, 61st Street •a E-0/0/0 E-0/0/0 2/2/2-T n T *I L> ,�11111 EJ ,� +—6/6/6 slat street 9/9!9-� ,a�,- 1 � slst street 0!010�' 'r 1/1/1 3/3/3 0/0/0 v to N ,— °:1.00) o 9/9/9, m y(22 a 2/2/2-i, o 2 15 3 O ( J - 0 61st Street rt ; . +ad • > Q t C6 > !, w;, � . 7;i0 .ate F a , 0 Q in- ,q1 ' CO• to _ Y rn co es !IF- i 4 t: ': (--335/345/345 ' 80/82/82 Valley View Rd ' 1 ,, 470/484/486—> ... '',illik at ' kw/ e Nr`._ . co 41 N - -',�.^�..—moi 4 N p (::::- . � M-- X137/141/142 (0;3 N F-237/244/246 :' 62nd Street f—8/8/8 , Valle View RC y `%, .. ' 5/5/5 286/295/296-> �f � � � � 3/3/3- .....co Y ,.. Al, MN. —r p� yt. 2 I X11/11/10 E' 4' F 393/405/407 3 2/2/2—" Valley View Rd N 519/535/538--> 2017 2020 NO BUILD tn-l- 2020 BUILD XX/XX/XX Vifir TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 4 W E N C K FOR EDINA FLATS WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK IN EDINA, MN HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. Ammiumix DRAFT riNai a a a ' 4/4/4 N a E-13fi/140/140 `° ' 0/0!0 . �� X135/139/139 X1/1!1 stat streetIT co I N� 4-13/13/13 I <-30 3�30 E,' 4, 25/26/26 0/0/0—1' 1 T `t stat street siststreet 10/10/10 oo,_ 0!0/0 '' 2/2/2 o o 616/6 0/0/0 r,N t M a r` 4/4/4—� 13/13/13 e,_N a Cr) 4/4/4 o v m oa <Eo N Y coo h- O "' 61st Street ..,......, 0,,,-... - -14,„ , —',,, ..,'-_=, 7064 0. - - ' a) '-':' i - . " a F', .4. - -N. --' Y c --lit,,, 0' ' X48/49/49 <-653/673/676 - z++;: Valley View Rd • , i 54/56/56 irr- 514/530/532—3 1 gyp ° ? fo • CO.Co X162/167/167 t . _ ✓ ;Ea INI —484/499/500 , 62nd Street 4 y X34/35/35 "ki Valle View Rd , ` 20/21/21 1 t r> 374/385/386—>, 9/9/9 mvv`� Cs E.2 Y ti; .,. - . 9/9/9— el y v-�o AM —81/83/83 $ TT- I-81/83/83 F-700/721/724 9/9/9—T Valley View Rd N 602/620/621 2017 F202NOILDUILDB2020 0 BU t XXJXX/XX VON/ TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 5 W E N C K FOR EDINA FLATS WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK IN EDINA, MN HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT /35-4, 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. September 2017 5-1 V V WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Figures 6 and 7 and discussed below. Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue (all-way stop) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS B for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements except the westbound through and right turn operate at LOS D or better. The westbound through and right turn operate at LOS F under all scenarios. The overall intersection operates at LOS F for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. Valley View Road/Kellogg Avenue (southbound stop controlled) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Valley View Road/62nd Street (southbound stop controlled) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Wooddale Avenue/61st Street (eastbound/westbound stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. September 2017 5-2 VAPIkV WENCK A Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT Act • Kellogg Avenue/61st Street (northbound/southbound stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Oaklawn Avenue/61st Street (eastbound/westbound yield control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Valley View Road/west access (southbound stop controlled) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A. During the p.m. peak hour under 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A. Valley View Road/east access (southbound stop controlled) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A. During the p.m. peak hour under 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A. Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue Intersection Under existing conditions during the p.m. peak hour, the westbound through and right turn movements at the all-way stop controlled Valley View Road/Wooddale Avenue intersection operate at poor levels of service. This results in a vehicle queue that extends east to 62nd Street. This condition does not occur during the a.m. peak hour. The westbound queue impacts the ability of motorists to access Kellogg Avenue as well as driveway access points between Wooddale Avenue and 62nd Street. As shown in the site plan, the proposed access points for the project are located in this area and therefore will be impacted by the vehicle queue. During the p.m. period when the westbound movements are operating poorly, some westbound motorists that want to travel north on Wooddale Avenue bypass the intersection September 2017 5-3 V v WENCK A Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. DRAFT by turning onto Oaklawn Avenue or Brookview Avenue. While this results in additional traffic traveling through the area north of the project, it does not result in any level of service issues. Changing from all-way stop control to traffic signal or roundabout control could help to improve traffic operations and reduce the amount of traffic bypassing the intersection. Additional consideration should be given to operations at this intersection to determine if changes to the intersection control are appropriate. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided both sides of Valley View Road and the east side of Wooddale Avenue. Sidewalk is not provided on Kellogg Avenue, Oaklawn Avenue, 61st Street, or 62nd Street. A striped bicycle lane is provided on both sides of Valley View Road. Bicycles are allowed on all the surrounding streets. The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on pedestrian and bicycle operations in this area. The number of trips generated by the proposed project has minimal impact on operations at the nearby intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle operations. Future plans for this area include additional sidewalk on 60th Street, which is located north of the proposed project. The bicycle facilities plan shows additional future bike lanes on both Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue. The proposed project will benefit from the existing and proposed sidewalk and bicycle facilities in this area. The full sidewalk and bicycle facility plan maps are included in the Appendix. September 2017 5-4 V V WENCK A ismimmi Resporslve oar tr e,.Excepuunal oucumes DRAFT u(-? / IV J (/*/::::::4:4 �A/A/A,� E—�aAaaa �A/A/A aaa B/B/B „r aaa f—B/B/B ��aA� s,st sweet aaa F-��A 1 L> _ +—B/B/B EJ J, �j A/A/A) 61st A/A/A--> T CA/A/� s,ststreet A/A/A�' A/A/A aaa A/A/A-� n T r A/A/A T a a a A/A/A—> Q Q zrY 22e:___- ......- - ....L.' .-; 61st Street z -9). ',;-:11. mlii. ,ill -'AI, ' . 7 .,-,Ir'r.._`........--.'''4'4'1 ` •"" 0 CD m m '-A/A/A !_ ?' - "°'^::,.r* CA/ZipValley View Rd - -� , � �. A/A/A- A/A/A—> 4 / `1,. —"-94 R mmm '-B/B/B `. - — . ......... .m mmm4—C/C/C „ ®C/C/C 62nd Street Valle View Rd Q A/A/A—4' Tfv 0 B/B/B B/B/B—3, Qaaa U U Y�A/A/A a w maaa j L> E—A/A/A QA/A/A Valley View Rd A/A/A N A/A/A—> 2017 2020 NO BUILD tFE2020 BUILD XX/XX/XX v41NT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FIGURE 6 W E N C K FOR EDINA FLATS WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK IN EDINA, MN HOUR LOS RESULTS Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. Amilliiiiiimer- DRAFT /ct Cary Teague From: Erin Lavelle Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 11:24 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Support Dear Mr. Teague, My name is Erin Lavelle and I am writing to you in support of the proposed condo tower project near Southdale. My wife and I recently moved to Edina(5413 Wooddale Avenue) and saw an article in the Star Tribune newspaper recently regarding a new condo project titled Estelle Edina. We further understand that some others in the community have reached out to you directly to express their support and we'd like to do the same. While we are happy with our house in Edina, we have family members and friends who have expressed moving to Edina and are seeking condos rather than traditional single family homes. While I expect there are many details to vet in the approval process for the project, as Edina residents we would like to express our support of the project concept. We look forward to seeing and hearing more about this project as it works through the stages of development and approval. Sincerely, Erin Lavelle 1 May 31, 2017 The City of Edina VIA Email Edina City Council Planning Commissioners 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, At a time of significant real estate development in the City of Edina, Galleria Shopping Center finds it appropriate to share with you our support for future real q estate developments in our city. In particular, Galleria sees great promise with the GA I.L,F P.1 A addition of projects that incorporate greater residential and commercial densities with increased heights (20+ stories). We believe that the increased density and careful use of land in these projects will enhance the overall commercial and residential experience in the Galleria/France Avenue neighborhood. Specifically, we support those projects which propose a standard of design excellence and quality construction that will appeal to the traditional Edina demographic and enhance the Edina community. The addition of these developments will set a high bar for future projects which will only improve our flourishing neighborhood. Thank you for including Galleria Shopping Center's support in your consideration of future Edina developments that will be a positive addition to our neighborhood and tax base. Sincerely, Edina Galleria Cary Teague From: Jill Linville Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 4:27 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed Estelle Edina Project Mr. Teague, Room & Board would like to share our support for the proposed Estelle Edina project. As a home furnishings retailer located on France Avenue, we have been serving customers in the neighborhood since 1989. We have seen the area grow over time, but believe the broader Southdale area needs to continue to evolve to meet the changing needs of the community. Assuming the proposed Estelle Edina project is completed as described in the documentation shared by the developer, we believe the additional residential and retail space along with green space will help energize the corner of France Avenue and 69th Street. This project reflects a residential and retail trend that is repeating itself in similar cities. Sincerely, Jill Jill Linville Communications Director Rocm Board 1 Cary Teague From: Thomas Thissen Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 3:22 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 69th and France Condo Project Good Afternoon Cary, I'm reaching out to put in my support for the 69th and France Ave condo development. My wife and I have enjoyed the changes in and around that area and feel that this condo project is just another step in the right direction. Thanks, Tom and Rachel Thissen 5209 Lochloy Drive Edina, MN 55436 Executive Advisor I Minnesota Recruiting & Staffing Association Main: (952) 924-9000 I - Connect with Us! 9, 1j TOP ' AWARD S"tAF"FING 1 MOBILE APP WORK ttn PLACESut � i � ES m,49 ciao wORK 2018 Cary Teague From: David Hawn Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 3:38 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Melissa Hawn Subject: Estelle Residential Proposal June 1, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this email on behalf of my wife and me to express our support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. We believe this project merits approval by the City Council as it would address a significant need for an attractive ownership option to both young business professionals and empty nesters (like us). We would love to move to Edina, but the options are very limited. The Estelle proposal has the potential for becoming a major draw to couples like us, who otherwise tend to gravitate to more plentiful options in downtown Minneapolis or Wayzata. Although I am not as familiar with Arcadia, I am excited about Ryan Companies and Kraemer and Sons being part of this project. Both are quality companies that will undoubtedly build a new condominium community of which we can all be proud. My wife and I look forward to becoming part of the Edina community as future residents of Estelle Edina. Thank you for your consideration of this exciting development opportunity. With warm regards, Dave and Melissa Hawn 1 edifla !IEdina CHAMBER OF COMMERCE May 23, 2017 Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director at City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 On May 22,the Edina Chamber of Commerce's Economic Development Committee hosted Ryan Companies and Aurora Investments, LLC to learn about plans for the Estelle Edina project. It is our understanding this project will come before the Edina Plan Commission tomorrow evening for sketch plan review. On behalf of the Economic Development Committee and the Chamber's Board of Directors, I'd like to take this opportunity to express our support of the project. While the project is in the early stages,the Edina Chamber of Commerce is encouraged by the quality and adherence to the nine guiding principles of the Southdale area work group incorporated in the proposal for Estelle Edina.We are also encouraged by the quality of craftsmanship proposed in this project. We will continue to follow the progress of this development. We look forward to further review as it evolves and takes shape over the coming months and appreciate the opportunity to share our comments with you, City Manager Scott Neal and the Edina City Council. Sincerely, d61)(.. . klatikx_eAM-b--vm Lori A. Syverson President 3300 Edinborough Way,Suite 150 • Edina, MN 55435 • 952-806-9060 Cary Teague From: David Hawn Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 3:38 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Melissa Hawn Subject: Estelle Residential Proposal June 1, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this email on behalf of my wife and me to express our support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. We believe this project merits approval by the City Council as it would address a significant need for an attractive ownership option to both young business professionals and empty nesters (like us). We would love to move to Edina, but the options are very limited. The Estelle proposal has the potential for becoming a major draw to couples like us, who otherwise tend to gravitate to more plentiful options in downtown Minneapolis or Wayzata. Although I am not as familiar with Arcadia, I am excited about Ryan Companies and Kraemer and Sons being part of this project. Both are quality companies that will undoubtedly build a new condominium community of which we can all be proud. My wife and I look forward to becoming part of the Edina community as future residents of Estelle Edina. Thank you for your consideration of this exciting development opportunity. With warm regards, Dave and Melissa Hawn 1 June 2, 2017 Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director at City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, My wife and I are sending this letter to express our support for the Estelle Edina project. We believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community, the City and our neighborhood. Many of our neighbors are Baby Boomers who have lived in their respective homes for 20+years and many of them have communicated in passing that they are nearing the point in their lives where they no longer have interest in maintaining a single family home but are frustrated by the limited owner-occupant living options within the City. As a community we need to continue to provide a variety of living options as people transition through different phases of their lives-from single family homes where they choose to raise their families-to becoming empty nesters who want to continue to own a home but want the "lock and walk" lifestyle that condo living offers. In addition, while condo living isn't just for empty nesters, the addition of a new owner-occupied living option in our community not only helps to retain people from moving to a different community but also potential opens up more additional single family homes for new people looking to raise their family in our community. Sincerely, Patrick and Stephanie Daly 5712 Lois Ln, Edina Cary Teague From: Erin Lavelle Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 11:24 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Support Dear Mr. Teague, My name is Erin Lavelle and I am writing to you in support of the proposed condo tower project near Southdale. My wife and I recently moved to Edina (5413 Wooddale Avenue) and saw an article in the Star Tribune newspaper recently regarding a new condo project titled Estelle Edina. We further understand that some others in the community have reached out to you directly to express their support and we'd like to do the same. While we are happy with our house in Edina, we have family members and friends who have expressed moving to Edina and are seeking condos rather than traditional single family homes. While I expect there are many details to vet in the approval process for the project, as Edina residents we would like to express our support of the project concept. We look forward to seeing and hearing more about this project as it works through the stages of development and approval. Sincerely, Erin Lavelle i Cary Teague From: Scott Levin Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 5:04 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina project Dear Mr.Teague, I have been an Edina resident for the past 18 years and am CEO and Founder of MidDel Consulting, a Business System Integrator and Consulting firm serving the Energy industry since 2005. I am writing in regards to the proposed Estelle Edina development project on 69th and France. It seems this project opens up affordable housing opportunities for new and existing Edina residents in an aesthetically pleasing environment, and at the same time maintains the high quality standards of our city without the multiple downsides of an apartment type offering. Along with the substantial additional tax revenue to be gained, I believe this project makes sense on multiple levels for the City and its residents and I pledge my support. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Scott Levin CEO& Founder Email: M id Del SOW-i,;fofs,t ofl Ueit a DMin 5 This information is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please delete the message and notify us immediately via email at telephor, 1 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Twin Cities Campus Metropolitan Design Center Ralph Rapson Hall College of Design 89 Church Street SE ,1linneanolis.MN 55455-0109 June 16, 2017 Cary Teague Edina Community Development Director The City of Edina 4801 W.50th Street Edina,MN 55424 Dear Director Teague, I direct the Minnesota Design Center at the University of Minnesota and I have been following the Estelle Edina project and the worry of some about the height of the two proposed towers. The height of buildings can be an issue in an historic district or when tall buildings get constructed immediately adjacent to people's backyards,but neither is the case here. This project replaces a lot of surface parking and some low-rise buildings and is far enough away from any residential area that might be unduly affected by any shadows cast by the two towers. At the same time,the proposed Estelle Edina project realizes the vision of the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework, led by an affiliate of my center,Mic Johnson of Architecture Field Office. That framework calls for greater density, smaller blocks, increased architectural variety, and more mixed use— all of which Estelle Edina achieves. Having taller buildings along France Avenue is an excellent way of increasing the tax base of Edina and supporting the commercial vitality of the city without negatively affecting the single-family residential districts nearby. When Victor Gruen,the architect of Southdale,envisioned the mall in the early 1950s,he saw it as a way to create an urban pedestrian experience in the suburbs,with retail at the center of a dense residential, commercial,and institutional area. Only in recent years,with the construction of multifamily housing around Southdale,has Edina begun to realize the original vision of the place,with enough people living near enough to the mall to sustain its stores and make it a real community center. I know that Victor Gruen would strongly support Estelle Edina as the kind of development that will help ensure the financial health of the mall,especially in an era in which online shopping has begun to threaten the viability of bricks-and-mortar retail. Tall buildings when well designed and well situated,as is the case with Estelle Edina, are a great testament to the confidence people have in the future of a community. Rather than see the height of these two towers as a problem, I think the people of Edina should be proud that there exists that much demand among potential condominium owners to want to live in the community. Estelle Edina will greatly enhance the Southdale district and greatly benefit the City of Edina. I urge the city not to miss this opportunity. Sincerely, 11,,Z.,_ i� Thomas Fisher Professor and Director Cary Teague From: Pat Minea < Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 1:40 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle - Edina Proposal Mr. Teague, I am writing in support of the Estelle Edina Condominium project. I am a resident of Edina for over 25 years and this project seems like a great idea for people like my wife and I as we look to our next chapter in life. We will end up selling our Parkwood Knolls home in the coming years and hope to find a condominium that will fit our life style as we start to travel. This project seems like a good fit on the proposed site and it will help with the current shortage of supply for condominium options for many residents in the Edina and South Minneapolis and the surrounding area. Please support the project and call me with any questions or comments. Have a great day and thank you for listening. Sincerely, Pat Minea Patrick S. Minea N©RTH MA.RQ Executive Vice President—Regional Manager I Production CAPITAL P ` 579 3500 American Blvd UV,Suite 500 I Minneapolis,MN 55431 Electronic Privacy Notice This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is confidential and proprietary in nature, If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Virus We believe, but cannot guarantee, that this e-mail is virus free prior to leaving our computer system. Please take necessary measures to ensure that it is free from harmful components as we do not accept responsibility for any loss or damage it may cause to your computer systems, Thank you for your cooperation. 1 Cary Teague From: Terry Edam Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 4:57 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle I do support the Estelle as represented but I wish it wasn't going to be so tall. Terry Edam 4428 Dunberry Lane, Edina. 1 Cary Teague From: Cole DeVries Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 1:16 PM To: Cary Teague; James Hovland; Kevin Staunton; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Robert Stewart Subject: Support for Estelle Edina Project Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Brindle, Fisher, Staunton &Stewart: As Edina homeowners who live on Southdale Road directly next to the proposed Estelle Edina development, we are writing to express our support for the project. We have met with members of the Ryan Companies and their support staff, they have thoughtfully and kindly been meeting with us and other neighbors near the proposed development. I have appreciated the time they have taken to answer our questions and listen to our concerns. We believe Estelle Edina will transform a block that currently is ugly looking bank drive-through lanes into a community asset that is walkable.This is what we are most excited about. We love the idea of being able to walk to more local restaurants and shops.This is one of the reasons we decided to move to our current house. Neighborhood concerns are understandable and we had a number of them ourselves, but we believe the development team is listening to those concerns and doing everything possible to address them. While this project would be taller than any buildings currently in Edina, the combined towers have a smaller footprint than the Westin, which has now been open for more than 8 years. We believe that Estelle Edina has the potential to be a prestigious building/complex that will offer more to people of the Lake Cornelia neighborhood than the Westin with all the proposed shopping, restaurants and public spaces. We have been told the slender, "needle" towers will help minimize the impact of shadows on homes including ours. This was a big concern of ours.After hearing the engineers were able to shave 30ft off the top of the building, seeing prospective renderings and downloading an app that shows the Sun's path during different times of the year we don't see this posing much of an issue. We are hopeful that you will work with the developers to move this project forward and turn the France Ave, Southdale and Galleria area into the shopping and restaurant hub we want it to be. Sincerely, Cole & Brandi DeVries 6900 Southdale Rd Edina, MN 55345 1 Cary Teague From: Janet Weber Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 2:12 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estella of Edina My name is Janet Weber and my husband is Ron Weber. Our address is 5200 Larada Lane. We would really love to see a luxury condo built in the right location for people of our age to own and not rent. We want to go into maintenance free luxury space near shopping and restaurants. Estell would be perfect. We are tired of seeing all of the rentals going up every where.The rental buildings look cheap and depressing for the most part. Walking distance is also important. We hope that Edina will offer something for all of the empty nesters like us.The Estell project would add a very classy look to the Southdale area. Thank you For your consideration Sent from my iPhone 1 Cary Teague From: Carl Runck • Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 8:14 AM To: Scott H. Neal; Bill Neuendorf; Cary Teague Subject: FW: Estelle Edina - Former Mayor Richards FYI Original Message From: Fred Richards To: Hovland Jim • Sent: Mon, Aug 14, 2017 9:30 pm Subject: EstelleEdina Mayor and Council there is little more to add for your consideration following former mayor Maetzold's thoughtful comments about the Estelle project now pending before you. I wholly support Denny's comments and would urge you to approve this project. In approving this project it would , in my judgement, provide in a most positive fashion more owner occupied housing choices for people who now desire to move from a single family detached housing environment. This in turn makes available that housing stock which has proven to be most desirable for young families which in turn greatly benefits our Edina School system, which, as we all know, is one of the cornerstones of our community. Additionally, I believe vertical growth is essential to capture the dynamics of the future as our city continues to move forward into the 21st century. As always, you are to be commended for your thoughtful deliberations on these often times contentious issues coming before you. Good luck and thanks for your service. Fred Richards, former Edina mayor 1 Cary Teague From: Anderson, Mike Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 4:19 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: 'Andrea Anderson' Subject: Estelle Edina - Letters of Support Dear Edina City Council And Community Development Director Teague, I am writing this letter in support of the Estelle project in Edina. I simply see the project as additive to the city of Edina. With the uncertainty of brick and mortar retail unclear, I believe this area being developed with neighborhood type options as something we support. I see how the height of such a project/building may cause some living nearby concern...that being said, I also believe change is essential to growth and think the Estelle Project will prove to be a strengthening factor for the community. It will add meaningfully to our tax base and please note I also hold the individuals heading this project from Ryan Construction in high regard. Good luck with your decision and thank you for taking a look at our thoughts. Thank you, Mike &Andrea Anderson 11 Cooper Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Mike Anderson Institutional Equity Sales Craig-Hallum Capital Group Sales Partners: Guy Whitehead Aare- Wright Erik Nelson This email has been scanned for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast. For more information please visi 1 Cary Teague From: Williams, Jason J Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 7:02 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle. As an Edina resident I strongly support the Estelle Edina residential development that will help keep Edina strong and vibrant for decades to come.The project would provide new options for residents who want to make Edina their home, while contributing approximately$4 million per year in additional tax revenue to local government—of which $1.2 million per year would be funding for Edina Public Schools. Estelle Edina is a walkable, bikeable, accessible, and livable project. It incorporates distinctive and iconic architecture unique to the Twin Cities and slender, "needle" towers to connect the neighborhood in a family-friendly, pedestrian-friendly way. Jason Williams 7305 Lanham Ln Edina, MN 55439 Sent from my iPhone American Family Insurance Company I American Family Life Insurance Company I American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. I American Standard Insurance Company of Ohio American Standard Insurance Company of Wisconsin I Home Office - 6000 American Parkway I Madison, WI 53783 Permanent General Assurance Corporation I Permanent General Assurance Corporation of Ohio I The General Automobile Insurance Company, Inc. DBA The General° I Home Office -2636 Elm Hill Pike I Nashville,TN 37214 wholly owned subsidiaries of American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. If you do not want to receive commercial messages from American Family in the future please visit the following website: *If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete this e-mail, any attachments and all copies. 1 Cary Teague From: Al Enriquez Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 9:07 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Support of Estelle Edina project Dear Cary, I am writing in support of the Estelle Edina project. I believe this is a great concept that addresses a significant need in our community and would bring in additional tax revenue for our city and schools. Thanks for your consideration of this matter. Al Enriquez, MD 5720 Newport Drive Edina, MN 55436 Sent from my iPhone 1 Cary Teague From: Jeff Borst < Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2017 11:23 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: jborst@q.com Subject: Estelle Edina Good Evening Cary, I'm sending you this brief email to voice support for the proposed residential development, Estelle Edina. With three boys in Edina's school system, I appreciate the additional funding that this project will contribute to Edina's Public Schools (via tax revenue from Estelle). I also feel that the renderings of this development look very impressive and tasteful. The Estelle would be a positive addition to the France Avenue/ Southdale/ Galleria area of our community. Thank you very much. Respectfully yours, Jeff Borst Jeff& Stacie Borst 4820 Aspasia Lane Edina, MN 55435 1 Cary Teague From: Andy Hatch < Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 7:39 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Good morning Cary. I wanted to take the time to let you know that I'm in favor of the Estella Edina development. I've reviewed the project in detail and feel that this development will provided wonderful options for resident's who want to make Edina their home, while contributing millions in additional tax revenue to local government of which a large portion per year would go towards Edina Public Schools. Overall the scope of the project has a nice feel, has been tastefully put together and would be a great addition to Edina. Thank you, Andy Andy Hatch 5125 Tifton Drive Edina, MN 55439 1 Cary Teague From: Scott Richardson Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 9:49 AM To: Cary Teague Cary, I am writing you today as a concerned resident of Edina. I want to ensure that Edina maintains its standing as the "best" place in Minnesota to live and raise a family. We care deeply that our tax dollars be used to fund the continued development of Edina as a community that sets itself apart form others based on the quality of its schools,vibrancy of its commercial sector and commitment to continuously improving the community. We feel that Estelle Edina is a proposed residential development that will help keep Edina strong and vibrant for decades to come.The project would provide new options for residents who want to make Edina their home, while contributing approximately$4 million per year in additional tax revenue to local government—of which $1.2 million per year would be funding for Edina Public Schools. Estelle Edina is a walkable, bikeable, accessible, and livable project. It incorporates distinctive and iconic architecture unique to the Twin Cities and connects the neighborhood in a family-friendly, pedestrian-friendly way. Scott R. Richardson 4724 Annaway Drive Edina 55436 1 Cary Teague From: david_gadtke Sent: Friday, August 04, 2017 3:20 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina (Southdale Area redevelopment) Dear Sirs : Recently I have become aware of the proposed Estelle Edina project. As a 15 year resident of Edina (6314 McIntyre Pointe) I am very familiar with the Southdale area. In addition, one of my sons has a law office only one block from the proposed site. He and his family also live in Edina. As my wife and I are now in our early 60's and empty nesters, we are considering selling our 6314 house. The Estelle Edina project seems to be a perfect solution for us to remain connected to Edina and meet our desires for low maintenance living. Please know that I support this project 100%. Thank you. Sincerely, David W. Gadtke 6314 McIntyre Pointe Edina, MN 55439 Sent from Windows Mail 1 Cary Teague From: Rickert, Paige @ Minneapolis Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2017 2:46 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina To Edina City Council members My name is Paige Rickert. My family and I have been residents of Edina for the past 20yrs. I am writing to express my support for Ryan Companies' Estelle development. In looking at the plan and the overall vision of the development, I feel it will add a critical component to the future fabric of the France Ave corridor. Just as the Southdale shopping center was a giant leap forward for Edina in the 60's, the Estelle project will help Edina maintain it's place in the metro area as the place to be. We all understand the national and local demographics with the demand for lifestyle centric residential being critical to the buyers of the future. The retail industry is in a tail spin and will require years to determine what it will ultimately look like. This project is key to jump starting and establishing this district as a long term hub for the City. On the converse side not doing anything and waiting for the district to further deteriorate with a heavy retail focus, will create a void in the France Ave district. There are many examples of this nationally that serve as what lies ahead without taking action today. Thank you for your consideration. Paige Rickert 5304 Forslin Drive Edina, MN 55436 1 Cary Teague From: Nathan Whittier Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 2:29 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear, Cary Teague, Edina Community Development Director: I am writing to express my support for the Estelle Edina residential development project. My business, SKS Consulting Psychologists, has called Edina its home for the last 20+years. One reason we chose (and have chosen to stay in) Edina is the pedestrian friendliness that is so characteristic of the community. Individuals who come to our office often remark about the easy time they had driving to our location, as well as "feeling" like they were out of the city despite being so close. Finally, many remark at the unique character and charm of the residential neighborhoods they drive through on their way to our offices. It is our opinion that the Estelle Edina project is consistent with what we, and our clientele, enjoy most about the city—it is progressive, pedestrian friendly, and distinctive in its look. As such, we at SKS Consulting Psychologists would like to offer our support for this exciting project. Sincerely, Dr. Nathan Whittier losigttt partners fl the pursuit of hotnon excellence 1 Cary Teague From: bonnie hankinson Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 4:20 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Mayor Hovland, Council Members Brindle, Fisher, Stauton, & Stewart, & Community Development Director Teague, As a Senior Residence of Edina, now for over 45 years, I am in great support of the Estelle Edina Project. We have loved Edina as a community to raise our 3 sons, and now watch our 8 grandchildren being raised here. When it became time for us to "give up" our family home....where would we go?? Edina needs Estelle Edina as an answer to many of its citizens. It will be a perfect fit for so many "Edinans" that do not want to leave this area...do not want to move downtown, or head West to Eden Praire, or Wayzata. It will be a win for the City, with a profitable tax base...a win for ungrading France Avenue...a win as a new home for many!! What a great fit and answer for those not wanting to leave this Community. Edina needs this positive project...Estelle Edina!! Please consider this wonderful addition to our City. Thanking you for your support! Bonnie Hankinson 6414 Gleason Court Edina, MN 55436 (39 years at 5 Circle West/Edina, MN 55436) 1 Cary Teague From: Eigner, Troy < Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 10:39 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Project Cary, I'm writing to voice my support for this project. I think this is a great project that will bring much need, quality affordable hosing to Edina; while at the same time bringing another solid source of tax revenue. Additionally; I appreciate that the developer has worked closely with the community to make sure their concerns are addressed as well. Regards, Troy & Michelle Eigner 4601 Casco Ave. 1 Cary Teague From: Hayhoe, Tom @ Minneapolis Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 10:39 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Support for Estelle Edina I am writing this letter in support of the proposed Estelle Edina project by Arcadia and Ryan Companies. As an Edina resident and real estate professional, I find the project to be a fantastic way to bring a much needed update to the Southdale area, which could trigger it to be the next great neighborhood in Edina. The project will provide a variety of quality housing options and add greatly to our tax base. I believe Ryan Companies to absolutely be the best developer to make this happen. Thank you for your consideration! Regards, Tom CBRE I Advisory & Transaction Services 190C) LaSalle Plaza, 800 LaSalle Ave Minneapolis MN FJ-;41.i) Connect with me on Linkedin Follow CBRE:Facebook I(cJchre I Google+ 1 Cary Teague From: Mark Swenson I> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 10:43 AM To: :ary Teague Subject: Estelle Condominiums Dear Mayor Hovland and Director Teague: I am sending you this email as a concerned citizen and an architect who has lived in Edina for 32 years. I want to communicate my support of the proposed Estelle condominium project. I was the Principal architect when my firm, ESG Architects, designed the Westin Edina Galleria project a decade ago. That project faced significant opposition over building height but is now a widely welcomed and appreciated piece of the cityscape in the Southdale corridor in Edina. I am confident that the Estelle Condominium project, when completed, will be viewed in a similar light. Besides providing the needed housing for empty nesters, this project will significantly increase the tax base and will support both our City and School District with about$4 million per year in additional local property tax revenue. From an architects perspective, I can also say that the overall design quality and exterior design expression for the Estelle project represents the quality of development that our city should aspire to deliver to our residents. Specifically, the vibrant urban outdoor spaces, the elegant and narrow building profile, the walkability and bike access this project supports will collectively increase the quality of life for all the residents and visitors to the site. Also, as a design professional, I believe that the 22 and 24 story height of the two proposed Estelle towers is appropriate for the France Avenue corridor at Southdale and is in scale with both the Point of France Condominium tower and the Westin Edina Galleria Hotel and Condominiums tower. This design solution will create a slim and attractive building profile which will be far better than the typical 6-12 story much larger footprint apartment/condo configuration that would be much more obtrusive along France Avenue. Based on the logic of these comments, I request that you support this project for our city. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely Mark Swenson, FAIA 5501 Dever Drive Edina MN 55424 Mark G. Swenson, FAIA, LEED AP, Founding Principal ESG I Architecture & Design S00 Washington Avenue South, Suite 1080, Minneapolis, MN 55415 1 Cary Teague From: Peter Hankinson Sent: Monday, August 07, 2017 3:08 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Residential Hi Cary, I live at 4832 Maple Road and have been an Edina resident for nearly 30 years. I am emailing you in my support of the Estelle Edina Residential project. Coming into the empty nester phase of my life, I would like to see the Estelle Project happen in Edina. I love this community and want to live here forever, but frankly I'm not seeing hardly any owner-occupied options out there. I live very near 50th and France and love the ability to walk places. I think the same type of atmosphere would be created at 69th and France where I don't believe much is happening currently. I don't know anything about Arcadia but I do know Ryan Companies has a stellar reputation and would "walk the talk" as they say. Thank you for taking the time to read my thoughts. Peter Hankinson I Account Executive 225 South 6th Street, Suite 1900 Minneapolis, MN 55402 PAPA • 1 Cary Teague From: Brunkow, Jeffrey S Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 1:13 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Cary Teague, As an Edina homeowner I am writing to you to voice my support for the Estelle Edina condo project near the Galleria. This project looks to place more affordable housing options in Edina and something new and vibrant to the area which already has many surrounding condominiums. This new development will continue to help contribute to the increasing tax needs the city requires. This is particular evident with recent school referendums that have passed and continual annual increases in other property related taxes. This will help support local retailers and business as well as locally based companies who will be hired to complete this project. Appreciate your consideration. Thanks, Jeff Brunkow Senior Director, Kidney Solutions Complex Medical Conditions Opto m This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. 1 August 8,2017 Edina City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am writing to express my personal support for Estelle Edina and respectfully ask for your support as well. While I am not an Edina resident, as president of the Edina Chamber of Commerce and Explore Edina, I have my pulse on the desires of residents and businesses. As many of you know,the Chamber recently completed our strategic plan that included in-depth surveys and interviews with Chamber members, nonmembers and residents.The overwhelming majority of participants are looking to the city council to lead the community forward-to be innovative and competitive with surrounding communities.This includes keeping our neighborhoods family-friendly while developing France Avenue into a bustling corridor; full of vibrancy and life;seamlessly integrating housing, entertainment and commercial interests. I hope you will also consider the following: • Rejecting a project like Estelle begs for a "run of the mill" development to take its place and encourages mediocrity. • Estelle Edina fills the need for owner-occupied housing that allows Edina residents to downsize and stay in the community. • This is a critical time in Edina's economic development.Several major redevelopment projects along France Avenue are upon us.The decisions we make today,will determine what France Avenue will be for the next 30 years. Estelle(and its neighbor Avenue of France)set the tone for other projects along the corridor. • Galleria and Southdale Center have made their home in Edina.While the retail environment is undergoing change, Galleria has positioned itself well and Southdale is working to create a new vision for their property. Rental housing has a turnover rate of 50%which by its nature encourages transient lifestyles that do not build community. France Avenue needs owner- occupied housing that builds upon Edina's already strong sense of community. Thank you for your time. Very Sincerely, Lori Syverson Cary Teague From: james campbell Sent: Friday, August 11, 2017 8:08 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: James Hovland Subject: Estelle Edina I am writing this to express my total support of Estelle Edina. This is exactly the kind of development that Edina needs to maintain our community as a forward looking, exciting place to live, work and raise of children! As the former Chairman and CEO of Wells Fargo, Minnesota, I was involved when we chose Cesare Pelli to design the Wells Fargo Center in downtown Minneapolis. I am thrilled that the design of Estelle Edina looks a bit like the iconic tower that identifies the Twin Cities as one of the most progressive cities in the world. I have looked at the economics of this project and they appear to be outstanding from a Edina taxpayer's perspective. Please move forward with Estelle Edina. This is one of the most exciting projects that Edina has ever considered. Thank you. James R. Campbell 5521 Woodcrest Drive Edina, MN 55424-1651 1 Mayor Hovland and Cary Teague, Congratulations on helping our city of Edina get better and better. I wanted to send you this e- mail as an interested citizen who has lived in the Cornelia neighborhood for the past 32 years. I have been actively involved in our community, including being a part of Edina Federated Women's Club — its president in 2014. I think you have already heard from a very vocal minority of folks in my neighborhood expressing opposition to an upcoming project that I'm looking forward to seeing. I feel it is important for you to know that in my opinion, the majority of my neighbors welcome the proposed Estelle condo project and see it as a major improvement for that site and are happy about the significant benefits it brings to our great city. Clearly we need more empty nester condo housing options so we can free up the single family homes so that younger and growing families can continue to live and flourish in our city. Further, the number of units being proposed on this project will significantly increase the tax base and will support both our City and School district for many years to come. I have been told this is about $4M per year of additional local property tax revenue. I also want to tell you that this is the most beautiful development I've seen proposed in Edina for as long as I've lived in the city—which has been since 1970. I love the park-like feeling I got when I saw the drawings. It felt so warm and welcoming. This is the kind of beauty— architecturally and esthetically—that we'd love to see in Edina. I'd like to conclude by saying that the height of the proposed condo buildings seem to be just fine with me—much better than a box-like structure. I love how slender and attractive they are —would love to live there myself. It would be an easy move as I live but three or four blocks west. I've talked with a realtor friend and a near-by neighbor, who's a developer, and they're both in favor of cheering this project on. Please, as leaders of our great city, give it all the support you can. Sincerely, Arlene Clapp 6925 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 Cary Teague From: Carl Runck Sent: Monday, August 14, 2017 12:45 PM To: 'James Hovland'; 'Mike Fischer'; Kevin Staunton; 'Bob Stewart'; Mary Brindle (Comcast) Cc: Scott H. Neal; Cary Teague Subject: FW: Estelle Edina support from Jim Campbell of 5521 Woodcrest Drive in case this wasn't forwarded. Forwarded Message From:james campbell Sent: Aug 11, 2017 8:08 AM To: Cc: James Hovland Subject: Estelle Edina I am writing this to express my total support of Estelle Edina. This is exactly the kind of development that Edina needs to maintain our community as a forward looking, exciting place to live, work and raise of children! As the former Chairman and CEO of Wells Fargo, Minnesota, I was involved when we chose Cesare Pelli to design the Wells Fargo Center in downtown Minneapolis. I am thrilled that the design of Estelle Edina looks a bit like the iconic tower that identifies the Twin Cities as one of the most progressive cities in the world. I have looked at the economics of this project and they appear to be outstanding from a Edina taxpayer's perspective. Please move forward with Estelle Edina. This is one of the most exciting projects that Edina has ever considered. Thank you. James R. Campbell 5521 Woodcrest Drive • 1 Cary Teague From: Scott Sundet Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 8:34 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Hello Mr Teague, As a live long Edina resident growing up and living just east of southdale I'm a proponent of this development. Also as an employer in the Twin Cities I'm also aware of the need for affordable housing. I like the area that you are considering redeveloping as it would make a better use for the area. I was impressed with the planning and thought that went into this project. Best Regards scott Scott Sundet Clarus Medical �ICB CLARUS „ .Y J MEDIC AL _. ;: 1 September 7, 2017 Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director at City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to exp!',?;;s my support t Edik.1 project This project makes a positive contribution to the community, city and neighborhood.There are many contributing factors as to why this project benefits current and future residents. As a community we need to provide a variety of living options, as people transition through different phases of their lives -from single family homes where they choose to raise their families-to becoming empty nesters who want to continue to own a home but also want the "lock and walk" lifestyle that condo living offers. Many of my neighbors are Baby Boomers whom have lived in their respective homes for 20+years. They've communicated at this point in their lives,they're no longer interested in maintaining a single family home, and are frustrated by the limited owner-occupant living options within the City. Condo living isn't just for empty nesters, the addition of a new owner-occupied living options helps to retain people from moving to a different community, but also potentially opens up more additional single family homes for residents looking to raise their family in our community. In addition, I am aware of the capital/funding the project would provide to the Edina education system. This is a large investment that my own children and current family residents would benefit greatly from. Please, don't let us to miss out on an opportunity to invest in our children's future. Sincerely, Stephanie & Patrick Daly 5712 Lois Ln, Edina Cary Teague From: Dawnn Eldredge Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 1:39 PM To: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Cary Teague Cc: John T. Wanninger Subject: Estelle Development Edina I am writing this email in regards to the proposed development of Estelle Edina. I am the owner of 6900 Dawson Lane. I am a strong believer in this development. I am excited about the opportunities is presents with walkability, having condos vs apartments, and feel it would be good for, not only the city, but my neighborhood . As an active person with 2 young boys, walkability is important to me. Currently, it is not easy to walk on France with my children and I would certainly never let them bike ride on France. I understand the sidewalk would move further from the street and there will be areas that connect the biking paths. It would be great to feel safe walking on and across France. I think the esthetics of the buildings are pleasing and also think Estelle will bring more revenue and life to Edina. I have reviewed the shadow report, the plans and concepts. I feel it will be a great asset to Edina and my area. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Dawnn Eldredae. Realtor Living In, Working In, And Supporting Your Community On air every Sunday 10am on am 1280 www.TCRealEstateHour.com Click on photo for client testimonials mow : 11S RFAINC Results Eldredge&Stodcll P.S. You will notice that I work"By Referral". That means I invest ALL my time working as hard as I can to meet and serve your real estate needs. I spend almost no time chasing new business. I want to build life-long relationships with all my clients. Since this is how I do business, most of my new clients come to me on the advice of people who have learned to trust and respect me. So.... I need your help! My success depends on Jackie Hoogenakker From: DeMoss Law Firm _ Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 10:15 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2017.010 - 6900, 6950 France Ave So. & 3905 - 69th Street West RE: Case File 2017.010 6900, 6950 France Ave. So. & 3905 - 69th Street West I am sending this document in favor of the construction project above-referenced. This project will be of benefit to the City of Edina. The additional tax paid by this project will be especially welcomed by the City of Edina. John DeMoss 4716 Hibiscus Ave. Edina, MN 55435 The information contained in this message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, and return the original message to us at the above address via the postal service. Thank you. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Karie And Craig Peterson Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 2:24 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment My husband and I would like to express our disappointment in the proposed amendment allowing construction height and density be increased in our neighborhood. We have lived here and enjoyed this family neighborhood for 34 years. We do not want this construction to take place and impact our desirable neighborhood with an eyesore and increased traffic that can and should be avoided! Please do not allow this amendment to current building restrictions to be adopted. In the fall and winter months when the leaves are off the trees, we already have a view of the Westin that disturbs our view from our front window/yard. Thank you for your attention. Karie and Craig Peterson 6928 Dawson Lane Edina, Mn. 55435 Sent from my iPad 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Katya Murray Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 10:38 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: CORNELIA RESIDENT OPPOSED TO ESTELLE DEVELOPMENT Hello, I'm writing regarding the high rise development currently proposed for 6900 France Avenue. I live in the Lake Cornelia neighborhood, directly behind the discussed area, and am writing in FIRM OPPOSITION to the proposal, specifically to increase the high rise(and zoning limits)from 4-stories to 24-stories. A tower 24-stories high is simply obscene for this neighborhood. The original plans accounted for transition between a proposed mixed use area and our quiet, lovely residential area. The houses in our neighborhood will be completely shadowed by something of this size, not to mention significant increases in traffic(foot and car)to an already punishing drive on France Ave and neighboring streets. Finally, our school district- and specifically Cornelia,which would be the neighborhood school for these towers-cannot handle an increase in enrollment. I'm very upset with how this proposal has been communicated to our neighborhood by the city, and how the city is clearly avoiding conversation with homeowners who would be directly impacted by the proposal to increase the towers to 24-stories. Also- I'm disheartened that the form letters and other letters of support that have been sent in support of the proposal by real estate agents(no surprise there!)and Edina residents who don't live ANYWHERE NEAR Lake Cornelia can be seen as honest support of the project. You need to know that's not our neighborhood's voice, and we are mad. I have shared this opposition with Mike Fischer, Mayor Hovland and multiple other planning commission members,and am sick that this development continues to be discussed. Regards, Katya Murray Lake Cornelia Homeowner 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Nora Davis Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2017 12:15 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Estelle - Planning Comp Amendment Greetings! I received the info re: the request to amend the comp plan. But I do have some questions - is the only difference in this plan the height and density issues - or have other changes been made? Secondly - could you please provide a plan that incorporates the adjacent Southdale First Addition (Lake Cornelia Neighborhood). We seem to have been forgotten. Also - could you provide a more legible copy of the material sent - my copy is very light - making all the comments difficult to read. I'm planning to have the information enlarged - and will need a better copy. Thank you for your assistance . . . Nora Davis 6921 Southdale Road Lake Cornelia Neighborhood 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Steve < ...4. Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 3:02 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Opposition of 6900 France Ave Proposal Hello, I'm writing regarding the high rise development currently proposed for 6900 France Avenue. I live in the Lake Cornelia neighborhood, directly behind the discussed area, and am writing in FIRM OPPOSITION to the proposal, specifically to increase the high rise (and zoning limits) from 4-stories to 24+ stories. A tower 24+ stories high is simply obscene for this neighborhood. It's completely unreasonable. The original plans accounted for transition between a proposed mixed use area and our quiet, lovely residential area. The houses in our neighborhood will be completely shadowed by something of this size, not to mention significant increases in traffic (foot and car) to an already punishing drive on France Ave and neighboring streets, including 70th Street running directly in front of Cornelia Elementary School. Finally, our school district - and specifically Cornelia, which would be the neighborhood school for these towers - cannot handle an increase in enrollment. I'm very upset with how this proposal has been communicated to our neighborhood by the city, and how the city is clearly avoiding conversation with homeowners who would be directly impacted by the proposal to increase the towers to 24-stories. I would like to see the outcome if a similar proposal was being pushed at the 50th& France area. Also - I'm disheartened that the form letters and other letters of support that have been sent in support of the proposal by real estate agents (no surprise there!) and Edina residents who don't live ANYWHERE NEAR Lake Cornelia can be seen as honest support of the project. You need to know that's not our neighborhood's voice, and we are mad. For the record, the owner of the developer was going door to door in the Cornelia neighborhood a few weeks back, and after a morning of trying to get signatures in support of the development, he had only ONE signature from the entire Cornelia neighborhood. It's clear the neighborhood is not in support of the proposal. I have shared this opposition with Mike Fischer, Mayor Hovland and multiple other planning commission members. Regards, Steve Murray 1 Cary Teague From: Darren Wennen Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 4:58 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Oppose 6900 France Development Dear Mr. Teague, I am aware of the proposed 6900 France high rise development and am writing to express my opposition for the following reasons: The proposed high rises will be three times the height of the Point of France building. Looming above the adjacent single family homes, it will dwarf our neighborhood and we will be forced to deal with loss of privacy and sunlight during the day, and light pollution at night. It is simply out of scale with the surrounding neighborhood and setting a 360 foot high rise 400 feet from a single story residential neighborhood violates good urban planning and design principles. Edina's 2008 Updated Comprehensive Plan clearly addresses the serious and sensitive issue of needing to protect established residential neighborhoods from the negative effects of high density developments: "Buildings should fit within the context of surrounding neighborhoods" and "scale and height should be regulated to provide complimentary transitions to adjacent neighborhoods." It will adversely affect traffic. Traffic is already very congested along 70th and Valley View Road, particularly at certain times of day. Drivers often cut through the Lake Cornelia neighborhood to avoid the slower speed limits on 70th Street and this will only increase. This will worsen the noise pollution in this area and we will lose the quiet enjoyment of our streets. It will set a precedent for development adjacent to residential neighborhoods. If the 4-story limit in the current zoning regulations is eliminated and the principle of transitional buffers between high rises and residential neighborhoods is abandoned, Edina will face similar high rises in the 50th and France area and potentially other areas as well, potentially destroying the character and quality of life in Edina. The planning process has lacked community voice and transparency. Only a hastily-arranged small group of selected Edina residents has had input into this project so far. A far broader discussion needs to occur. To date, planning documents and mock-up pictures have emphasized congruence with the Southdale commercial area and have obscured the impact and lack of consistency with the adjacent residential area. Even the rendering in the Star Tribune grayed out the homes next to the proposed development. There should be far more evaluation and an open discussion around the Southdale Development Plan that is currently in process before considering how this type of development might fit in with those principles. Please share my concerns with the rest of the planning committee. Sincerely, Darren and Heidi Wennen 6720 Point Drive Edina, MN 55435 1 Cary Teague From: Steven Schreiber Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 1:18 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Fwd: Estelle Edina Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Steven Schreiber• > Date: June 5, 2017 at 1:11:10 PM CDT Subject: Estelle Edina I'm writing this letter to you to express my opposition to the proposed 24 story condo project. I live at 6713 Cornelia and the proposed 24 story condo will be in my direct line of sight. I am very upset over this possibility. I oppose this 24 story building in our neighborhood because of its excessive height. I tolerate the height of the Point of France towers, however I can't tolerate a structure that is three times the height of the Point of France condos. This monstrously tall structure would be a constant eye sore as it towers over the tree line of my backyard. Please note my opposition to this 24 story condo. Steve Schreiber 6713 Cornelia Dr Edina Mn 1 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members Brindle, Fisher, Staunton & Stewart: I was disappointed to learn that the Developer and Real Estate representatives of the "Estelle Edina Sketch Plan" have been in our Lake Cornelia Neighborhood attempting to solicit neighbor signatures on a petition to approve the concept. Their tactics were deplorable. They were rude and intimidating. Worst of all —neighbors were threatened with retaliation — saying they would build "something ugly"if they did not agree to sign that petition. Typical bullying behavior. Residents of Edina should not be subjected to this treatment, ever. We all deserve to feel safe and secure in our homes. I was also concerned about what was being told neighbors about the shadows from that 360 foot building. Only one hour of shadow in the winter, they were told. Nothing was said about spring, summer& fall. I've seen their presentation twice—and each time the shadows from that massive structure appear to lessen. Perhaps if they re-engineer their presentation once more— the shadows will disappear completely? ? ? As you know—this neighborhood was misled and deceived about this project from the beginning. It is not a comfortable feeling knowing this neighborhood is under attack once again. I often wonder if my city is being held captive by developers—continually demanding more and more—or else? Please be aware—they seem to be targeting those areas not directly affected by that development. They have not appeared on Southdale Road—ground zero. Signatures obtained seem to be those who will benefit financially from this project, have a conflict of interest, or don't live in the affected area. And Point of France. Really? Point of France will not be seriously affected by the project. Only those on the south end of the building will even notice that massive tower. Folks living on France Avenue made that conscious choice to live there—it is not a neighborhood of single family homes. I'm assuming their next stop will be the Southdale Medical Building ? Please, I ask again that you respect and protect our neighborhood—and abide by the Comp Plan, with the Transitional Zone and the Four Story height restrictions. Thank you. Nora M. Davis 6921 Southdale Road 7.30.20 17 Cary Teague From: Al and Patrice Solyntjes Sent: Monday, August 14, 201/ 10:48 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle project Carey, will you please forward this to the Mayor, city council and the planning commission? I have seen the proposal to include an affordable housing element to the project. This seems to be linked to a desire for city funds in the form of TIF or other involvement. While I don't understand the financial cost of this approach, the changes do not affect the primary problem with this overall proposal, the height of the buildings. I urge you to abide by the existing plan and codes to limit the height to 4 stories this close to a residential neighborhood. The council's vision for the future does not need to come at the cost of existing plans and codes. Respectfully, Alan Solyntjes 6908 Cornelia Drive J Virus-free. Cary Teague From: Jessica Bergsten Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 11:25 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Tower Project I am writing as a concerned Edina citizen who wants to protect their home and neighborhood from the Estelle Towers. Points to consider: -Please keep in mind,Edina's current Comp Plan requires a"transitional area" between Neighborhoods and further development. There is NO TRANSITIONAL AREA for this project. One of the neighbors is just 160 feet to the BMO Property. Another is 423 feet from the epicenter of that massive tower. This is not the "three blocks" mentioned. -The Comp Plan also restricts building height to 4 stories. A 360 foot tower with 24 stories is too big. -Tower Shadow Forecast, imagine if your family home lost sunlight, especially during a MN winter -Visibility Tower will be visible 24 hours a day - 7 days a week - 'year round. Along with increased traffic and lights from the towers. -Traffic The traffic increase and time to get out of the neighborhood alone has gone up tenfold. With more people living there, employees and delivery trucks it will become too much. People are cutting through our neighborhood without a thought for the families living here. I respectfully ask you to abide by the the Comp Plan. Please protect our neighborhood and let us live in peace. We bought our home for what Edina stood for, a wonderful place to live and raise a family. It is sad to see the changes and how these families are fighting for what they've worked so hard to attain. Thank you for your time, Jessica Bergsten 1 Cary Teague From: Kari Geadelmann Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 9:22 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Mr. Teague, My name is Kari Geadelmann, and I'm an Edina resident who lives on Southdale Road. I continue to have significant concerns regarding the Estelle proposal. I ask that this proposal does not get approved. The project is far too high for being so close to a single family residential neighborhood. This would be more than SIX times higher than what the block is currently planned for, and is FAR too high. Doubling the density to 60 units per acre from 30 units is far too much. My neighborhood will feel the deep effects of such a major project. There will be years of construction noise, pollution, and increased traffic. There will be a greater burden on the roads, and increased congestion with so many homes on this property. We already have such a problem with traffic on 70th, 62, 100, and France during peak travel times! The quality of life will decrease for my young family, having to look at these towers all day and night. There is simply far too much height in these proposals. Please stay firm towards Ryan Companies and deny this proposal. Thank you for your time, Kari Geadelmann 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 10:41 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: bccnoradavis73@gmail.com Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Case File 2017.010 City of Edina Planning Commission: I am opposed to the amendment as described in your notice of September 15, 2017, and ask that you reject it in its entirety. The extreme increase in height would be an unwelcome visual intrusion into near-bye single- family neighborhoods, and the doubling of the allowable density would exacerbate an already over-crowded traffic situation. The City has adopted a Comprehensive Plan for the development of the Southdale commercial area. Please don't emasculate the Plan with a lot of ad hoc amendments. Gerald E. Hobbs 6904 Hillcrest Lane Edina, Minnesota Jackie Hoogenakker From: Sent: Sunday, September 1/, 201/ 1L:48 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Edina Planning Commission: My wife and I are OPPOSED to the Ryan Companies/Luigi Bernardi application to change the height and density of the area south of 69th Street and west of France. We do not want to wake each morning and view those two high structures. My personal feeling is that the developers are motivated by greed with total disregard for the area residents. If the Planning Commission were voted into office I would do my utmost to get all of you voted out of office for even considering the application. Dom Violante 6912 Hillcrest Lane Edina, MN 55435-1606 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Grady St. Dennis < Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 6:25 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file: 2017.10 To Whom it May Concern, We write with strong opposition to the proposed comprehensive plan amendment associated with the Ryan Companies/Luigi Bernardi proposed project at 69th and France Avenue. To propose a project that is so out of line with the established city comprehensive plan and to have it even considered by the planning commission and city council seems a waste of time. Especially, such a proposal that clearly has no regard for the surrounding Edina residents who most assuredly will be negatively impacted by the project. A comprehensive plan is not developed overnight. It is the result of significant input from all city stakeholders. We are disheartened that we seem to have city leaders who are not as committed to following the guidance of the citizen established comprehensive plan but instead the influence of developers. We voice strong opposition to the proposed comprehensive plan amendment and ask for a no vote. Sincerely, Grady & Angie St. Dennis 7005 Bristol Blvd Edina, MN 55435 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jim and Cindy Ripple < Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 9:29 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case file: 2017-010 Case file: 2017-010, Property Address: 6900, 6950 France & 3905 69th W We are writing in response to the case file noted above. We are strongly opposed to the Ryan Companies/Luigi Bernardi plans for the development at 69th Street and France Avenue South. The reasons are as follows: a) Structures as high as 26 stories do not fit the existing neighborhood of single-family homes and residential and commercial buildings with significantly lower heights. b) The adjacent Cornelia neighborhood would be negatively impacted by: 1) loss of sunshine due to shadow from these buildings, 2) increased traffic from this and other development in the area. We are especially concerned about cut-through driving in the neighborhood and parking problems. We are concerned that these factors will negatively impact home values in the neighborhood. c) The size of the proposed buildings is disproportionately large relative to the land on which it will be located. In short, any development with these proposed heights on this parcel of land, whether commercial or residential, seems like a major encroachment on the character and livability of our neighborhood. Our neighborhood is already on the border of Edina's commercial zone, with the Edina Realty building visible from our backyard and all the attendant traffic noise that comes from living near Valley View Road and the Southdale Mall area. This development would be an additional encroachment of commercial/high density residential use on our quiet, single-family home neighborhood. It is hard to imagine two buildings even taller than the Westin Hotel just across the road from our homes. For the reasons noted above, we are opposed to this development. Sincerely, Jim and Cindy Ripple 6825 Southdale Rd 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: David Hlavac < Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 10:32 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 69th and France Zoning Change Dear Edina Planning Commission, I am writing to express my opposition to proposed zoning changes in the Southdale corridor, specifically regarding the parcel at 69th and France. I am not opposed to development or density itself and would welcome modest zoning changes that reflect the nature of the neighborhood. However, the proposed Estelle development is far too tall, not only by City of Edina zoning standards but due to the character of our community. I believe the developers were thoughtful in their approach to the site, and while I like the initial design concepts, I would urge the Planning Commission to uphold its existing zoning restrictions and consider alternative proposals for that parcel that are more appropriate for a neighborhood of single-family homes. Please make note of my opposition to any zoning changes that would allow the sort of height and mass proposed by Luigi and the folks from Ryan. Again, I am not opposed to Estelle; the buildings simply need to be much shorter. Thank you, David J. Hlavac 1 C.. uvJ-JJJu david@belletristcommunications.com 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: McGivney, Rhonda • Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:01 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Planning Changes 69th & France Sept 27, 2017 I understand that there is a proposed development that would change the height restrictions. I also understand that you are seeking public feedback. I appreciate your role in government in a public office that seeks to understand multiple points of view. I also know that investment and developers are important to keep both tax dollars flowing and our communities to be fresh and vibrant. I believe that there are many paths to solutions that work for multiple constituents and therefore I trust that you are seeking a path that considers the neighborhood constituent in this particular case. As a member of the adjacent neighborhood, the change in density and height restrictions would be rather devastating to the community. I am not against development within the current height restrictions. However, changes to the height and density will disadvantage the neighborhood and our home values. Below is a summary of the reasons that I hope you will consider in your decision, 1) The focus is on the wrong location. Better location for development efforts primarily--Southdale mall needs help. Now is not the time to be increasing height and density across the street from Southdale. Southdale will become a concrete empty parking lot within 5 years. I've seen this in other cities we've lived in. 2) I've lived underneath tall buildings before in Chicago, both South Loop and on Chicago's northside. I lived in a 3 story building and a 6 story building added next to me--just those 3 floors meant no more sky for us. Going higher takes out sky for everyone around and even can reduce the temperature, affects what plants can grow, and create ice landings. Edina doesn't have Chicago's population to house, so it isn't worth it. 3) My property values and my neighborhood identity will decrease in value. 4) Building height is simply not needed. 4 stories fits with the surrounding area. We are not downtown neighborhood, we are not next to 494. We are a community of average homeowners. 5) Traffic at the circle was meant for the current density and leads up to an elementary school. There would be a ripple affect. 6) I believe neighbors and others have been advising against this for months, however I don't see any reaction to show that there is any listening. If so,this project wouldn't be continuing to try change the height restrictions. 7) I purchased my house a year ago. I would never have done so if there was a highrise within eyesite. Please let me know if you have any questions. I appreciate the considerations that you may make in your decisions. Rhonda McGivney [CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY NOTICE] Information transmitted by this email is proprietary to Medtronic and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is private, privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or it appears that this mail has been forwarded to you without proper authority, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this information in any manner is strictly prohibited. In such cases, please delete this mail from your records. To view this notice in other languages you can either select the following link or manually copy and paste the link into the address bar of a web browser: http://emaildisclaimer.medtronic.com 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: michael demoss Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 3:10 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Fwd: Ryan co/Bernardi As a property owner in Edina, I support the project proposed by Ryan Co and Luigi Bernardi. This will increase the tax base. I have seen the projects that Luigi Bernardi and Ryan Company have built and I believe the current project at 69th and France will be a beautiful addition to the area. Please move forward with this development. Michael DeMoss Attorney Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: michael demoss __ ..�,,�,�.�..... Date: September 19, 2017 at 1:00:31 PM PDT To: Mcd —• . �> Subject: Ryan co 1 Cary Teague From: Adelle Hansen Sent: Thursday,June 01, 2017 10:06 PM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Towers proposed on 6900 France Carey, Please share this email with the planning commission. Our family moved from a neighborhood in Minneapolis on the parkway near North Memorial Hospital. We chose the neighborhood of Heatherton Trail between 70th and 72nd street for the residential single family dwellings, the school district and the walking access to retail across France Avenue. When we heard of the proposal for a 24-story tower on our block, we were astounded that city planners were even considering it, since the existing Comp Plan only allows a 4 story, 48' max high building on this site, as well as very specific instructions for transitional areas between residential and commercial structures. If this proposal goes though, it will impact our view, the skyline and the hours of sun we enjoy. We bought our property based on the school district, and the existing city plan. These factors affected our offer on the house. Our neighborhood is becoming a victim of bait and switch as when we bought into the area we also "bought" the existing neighborhood city comp plan, not one that can be modified whenever a developer comes in with big money. Adelle Hansen, Esq. 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 8:34 AM Subject: FW: Development at the Bremmer and BMO bank site Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Original Message From: Ruth and Lewis Marshall Sent: Thursday,June 01, 2017 7:11 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Development at the Bremmer and BMO bank site I have learned of the proposal for a 360 foot tall building being built on the present location of Bremer and BMO bank. I thought there was a comprehensive plan that was guiding development in Edina. Four stories were the maximum. What is going on? It very inappropriate to have a building that large bordering a residential neighborhood. I understand it would bring a lot of tax revenue into the city in addition to the building permit revenue. There is more to life than money. Please be responsible to the residents of the neighborhood and don't allow this development. You have been elected to represent us and do what is best for the citizens of Edina. The developers don't vote for you, we do. Sincerely, Lewis and Ruth Marshall 7101 Cornelia Drive Edina 55435 1 June 2, 2017 Cary Teague& Planning Commission Members RE: Bremer& BMO Redevelopment Project I attended the Planning Commission meeting on May 24th. The Ryan Company, along with Arcadia, totally misrepresented and ignored our neighborhood-known as the historic Southdale First Addition. All the wonderful "letters of support" you received were part of a well- orchestrated campaign by the developer. Those letters were on the way to you before we knew about the project. We were blind-sided. Contrary to a comment made at the meeting-our Neighborhood is NOT three blocks away from ground zero. There is NO Transitional Zone as required by the Comp Plan. And the height of those towers is insulting to the Residential Neighborhood-with the largest tower at 360 feet-it will be three times the height of Point of France. Please remember the Comp Plan-and the need for a transitional zone and height restrictions. With no transition zone-those massive towers will be right in our faces-24 hours a day, seven days a week-year `round. Not respectful to our Residential Neighborhood. I don't think you would like this development in your backyard. The "neighborhood vantage point" photo taken at the intersection of 70th & Cornelia was ludicrous. With the tower just peeking above the tree line-it did NOT represent a view from the neighborhood directly west of the development-the view was taken from the south. This may be a glitzy and glamorous project- it just doesn't belong adjacent to a Residential Neighborhood protected by the Comp Plan. We'd like to invite you to visit our neighborhood to view what this massive development will do to our homes and our lives. Due to our work schedules-the best time to visit is in the morning between 8:30am & 9:30am. I look forward to hearing from all of you. Best way to reach me is by email- Thank you. Nora M Davis 6921 Southdale Road Cary Teague From: Richard Hauritz Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 1:07 PM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Please No Towers Follow Up Flag: Flag for follow up Flag Status: Flagged Good Afternoon, Please abide by the Comp Plan and adhere to the restriction of no buildings be more than 4 stories tall. No towers, it will change the total character of this neighborhood...for the worst. Thank you Edina Resident for 20 years Rick Hauritz Rick Hauritz 7204 Wooddale Ave. So. 1 Cary Teague From: Ruth and Lewis Marshall Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 7:13 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Development at the Bremmer and BMO bank site I have learned of the proposal for a 360 foot tall building being built on the present location of Bremer and BMO bank. I thought there was a comprehensive plan that was guiding development in Edina. Four stories were the maximum. What is going on? It very inappropriate to have a building that large bordering a residential neighborhood. I understand it would bring a lot of tax revenue into the city in addition to the building permit revenue. There is more to life than money. Please be responsible to the residents of the neighborhood and don't allow this development. You have been elected to represent us and do what is best for the citizens of Edina. The developers don't vote for you, we do. Sincerely, Lewis and Ruth Marshall 7101 Cornelia Drive Edina 55435 1 Cary Teague From: Fisher, Tracy Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 9:42 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: the Bremer& BMO Redevelopment - VOTE NO Importance: High Dear Cary, I live at 6709 Cornelia Drive, 3 short blocks from this proposed high rise development. There are hundreds of Southdale Annex residents that live much closer than our home &we are only 3 blocks away! This is not correct place to put 24 and 20 story high rise condos. The entire block of Cornelia neighbors is not in favor at all. Please ABIDE by the Comp Plan - and NOT "pick and choose". This may be an attractive proposal- it just doesn't belong adjacent to a residential neighborhood! Edina's current Comp Plan requires a "transitional area" between Neighborhoods and further development. There is NO TRANSITIONAL AREA for this project. One of the neighbors is just 160 feet to the BMO Property. Another is 423 feet from the epicenter of that massive tower! This is not the "three blocks" mentioned at the Planning Commission meeting last week! Thank you, 7 3 National Account Director Alcon®Vision Care 6709 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435 1 June 3, 2017 Dear Edina City Council, I am writing to express my concerns about the Estelle development that is being proposed for 69th Street and France Avenue. While I support the concept of condominiums being built in the Edina area, the proposed Estelle buildings are far too tall for the Southdale area. The current comprehensive plan calls for four story buildings. I cannot understand how 24 and 20 story buildings can even be remotely considered for this location. I am concerned that the buildings will impact the nearby residential area with shading and privacy issues. It is possible that homeowners could have up to 100 or more people looking into their yards and homes. This development plan is unfair to homeowners who bought homes in the neighborhood with the understanding that nearby development would be limited to four story buildings. Additionally, I am concerned that this project will set a bad precedent for development along the west side of France. Also, the impact of this type of development on home prices is unknown. It seems like the City Council has no respect for the Edina Comprehensive Plan as demonstrated by other development in the Greater Southdale area. It would make sense to put further new construction on hold in the Greater Southdale area until the Comprehensive Plan is fully updated. Without good planning, we will continue to see buildings being built that don't fit into the area such as the incredibly ugly apartments on France and Hazelton. Until the Comprehensive Plan plan is updated, and the citizens of Edina agree with the general concepts, the City council needs to respect it. The level of detail provided to the Planning Commission concerning the Estelle project was astounding. It went far beyond a typical sketch plan. I am concerned that this project may be a "done deal" in the minds of the City Council. I am also concerned about the increased traffic on France Avenue. It is already extremely frustrating to drive down France. This is a quality of life issue for those of us that live in the Cornelia neighborhood. This development,and other developments that have been approved by the City Council, will compound the traffic issues we are already experiencing. There seems to be no limit to the amount of traffic that you feel can be put into the Southdale area. Individuals will stop coming into the Greater Southdale Area if it becomes impossible to reasonably move along France. Additionally, I do not feel that affordable housing should be included in projects like the Estelle project. Permanent homeowners should not have to bear costs associated with affordable housing units. Thank-you for your consideration of my concerns about the proposed Estelle project. Sandra L. Carlson, 4433 Ellsworth Drive June 3, 2017 Edina Council Members and Staff Edina City Hall Edina, MN Re: Proposed Condominiums at Valley View and France Dear Council Members and Staff: I opposed the referenced development. The location is not resident friendly: Traffic is a major problem Street crossings are a problem The proposed plaza on the corner is ill conceived: Residents from the neighborhood to the west have no or very limited plaza access. Their neighborhood is fenced and landscaped along Valley View - limited egress from the neighborhood . Do you want to be on the plaza during rush hour(s) on France? I do not. Noise and congestion. Individuals from east of France are employees with marginal access across France. Limited parking for the plaza? High rise living projects, apartments or condos, have been shown to isolate the residents. The close, friendly, supportive neighborhoods, which have long been the foundation of Edina, will not result from this project. This push to luxury living is targeted at Edina's upper level citizens at the expense of younger families and even middle class families in Edina or those desiring to move into our suburban city. High rise living seems inappropriate for children - no yards, lack of neighborhood friends, isolationism, etc. Many citizens are gravely concerned about the height, effect on traffic, and related privacy issues. These items alone would cause me to vote against approval. Finally, the City Council should only operate within the laws and regulations duly approved by the citizens. I believe this includes the Comprehensive Plan. If you are not going to adhere to the Comprehensive Plan, then what other laws and regulations will you ignore? Please vote no on this project. JOHN W. CARLSON 4433 Ellsworth Drive Cary Teague From: Charlie Russell Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2017 11:32 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed development at 69th and France Dear Cary Teague, Hello Cary, I am writing as a concerned member of the Edina community. I am strongly opposed to the proposed development at 69th and France. I recently moved my family to Edina and live in the Lake Cornelia neighborhood. We did extensive research before moving here and really enjoy the family atmosphere here. This proposed development will change Edina ruin the neighborhoods around it. If I had I known of this development prior to buying our home we would not have moved to here. For the sake of Edina's families do not let this monstrosity forever change the face this community. I am sure there are alternative locations closer to 494 that are more in line with these types of structures than the neighborhoods in the proposal. This will be taller than the Westin and the water tower. It's 6 times the height of current zoning limits. This does not make sense. The height is too great! Don't be fooled by fancy marketing with cool graphics and people with smiles. The people are fake but the shadows cast by these buildings will impact hundreds of households. Please don't ruins our neighborhoods. Thank you, Charles Russell 1 June 2, 2017 Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director at City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, My wife and I are sending this letter to express our support for the Estelle Edina project. We believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community, the City and our neighborhood. Many of our neighbors are Baby Boomers who have lived in their respective homes for 20+years and many of them have communicated in passing that they are nearing the point in their lives where they no longer have interest in maintaining a single family home but are frustrated by the limited owner-occupant living options within the City. As a community we need to continue to provide a variety of living options as people transition through different phases of their lives-from single family homes where they choose to raise their families-to becoming empty nesters who want to continue to own a home but want the "lock and walk" lifestyle that condo living offers. In addition, while condo living isn't just for empty nesters, the addition of a new owner-occupied living option in our community not only helps to retain people from moving to a different community but also potential opens up more additional single family homes for new people looking to raise their family in our community. Sincerely, Patrick and Stephanie Daly 5712 Lois Ln, Edina Cary Teague From: Steven Schreiber Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 1:18 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Fwd: Estelle Edina Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Steven Schreiber Date: June 5, 2017 at 1:11:10 PM CDT Subject: Estelle Edina I'm writing this letter to you to express my opposition to the proposed 24 story condo project. I live at 6713 Cornelia and the proposed 24 story condo will be in my direct line of sight. I am very upset over this possibility. I oppose this 24 story building in our neighborhood because of its excessive height. I tolerate the height of the Point of France towers, however I can't tolerate a structure that is three times the height of the Point of France condos. This monstrously tall structure would be a constant eye sore as it towers over the tree line of my backyard. Please note my opposition to this 24 story condo. Steve Schreiber 6713 Cornelia Dr Edina Mn 1 Cary Teague From: Anne Gregerson Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:24 AM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Building Height Proposed for 6900 France Ave development Hello, I am a resident of the South Cornelia neighborhood at 4713 Hibiscus. It is my hope that this email would be reviewed prior tonight's city council meeting. I am writing to express my disappointment in the proposed building height for the "twin towers" slated for the 6900 France Avenue development. This would directly impact neighbors negatively, look starkly different from neighboring homes and minimize neighborhood sun exposure, and certain ignores the concept of a transitional zone. I am not opposed to condo or multifamily development in the Southdale area, however building height and style are critical to the area remaining tasteful and sustainable. Similar to Chicago neighborhood condo builds in areas of brownstone 2-3 floor homes, it would make sense to me that we limit the height of such developments in Edina to 4-6 stories tall.Two buildings as tall as proposed will look oddly placed on the edge of a neighborhood, esthetically unappealing, and truly affect neighbors' ability to enjoy their backyards, homes, and streets (for parking and for walks or bike rides). It also sets a precedent for future buildings along that corridor that would continue to impact the enjoyment of all of the South Cornelia neighborhood and worsen strain on our schools. In reference to the intention of the Comp Plan, I strongly encourage honoring a plan that limits building height in our neighborhood. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Anne Griffiths Anne Gregerson Griffiths, MD Pediatric Pulmonologist Children's Respiratory and Critical Care Specialists 1 Planning Commission Chair Olsen, I would like to address a meeting put together by the Greater Southdale Area Working Group and Ryan Companies on Thursday May 11,2017 at Think Bank.The meeting invited neighborhood residents and others to preview a proposal for the 69th and France Ave project. I am dismayed by the groups enthusiastic support and perceived endorsement of and for this project. My understanding of what the Greater Southdale Area Working Group is tasked with is to advise the Planning Commission and The City Council on proposed projects in the area. I do not believe the group is tasked with working in conjunction with developers to promote projects. Whether the attendees agree with this project or not,the way that the working group handled this meeting is distasteful. It is clear the group does not have our neighborhoods best interest in mind. It is clear they are looking out for the Ryan Companies interests. Please do not think or be of the opinion that all participants of this informational meeting left in agreement that this project is good for our neighborhood, our community or our city. It may be a good idea to m?et with the working group members to spell out what the scope of their work should be. Particularly the expectations, responsibilities and the limits of an advisory group such as this. Respectfully, Barry Hans 6913 Southdale Rd Edina, MN 55435 Cary Teague From: Marie Sullivan Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 12:23 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Fwd: Estelle Edina Dear City Planning Commission Members, I'm forwarding you a letter I sent to the City Council. I hope you will all work to preserve and protect Edina's 2008 Comprehensive Plan height restrictions of 2 to 4 stories for buildings along the west side of France Avenue. These restrictions were put in place to protect the residential home owners in the neighborhood just west of France Ave. It was further communicated to Cornelia neighborhood residents at that time that development on the east side of France would be limited to 6 stories, and that all taller buildings would be situated in the area just north of 494 so as not to degrade current residential areas! I expect Edina City Council and Planning Members to stand up to developers and protect current homeowners! Please forward this email to all Edina City Planning Commission Members. Thank you, Marie Sullivan Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Marie Date: May 17, 2017 at 11:54:37 AM CDT To: Subject: Fwd: Estelle Edina Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Marie Date: May 17, 2017 at 11:51:44 AM CDT To: -- Subject: Estelle Edina 1 Cary Teague From: Mike Tressler Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 4:44 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Residential proposal May 17th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express our full support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living— It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life— Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability— Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza — Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape -The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Anne Tressler and Mike Tressler 5-18-2017 Cary Teague Edina Community Development Director c/o Edina City Council and Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN. 55424 RE: Estelle Edina Project Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission; As part of a family with a long history in Edina, and Edina resident I am sending this letter in support of the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe a project such as this is just what the Southdale area and Edina needs.As my wife and I look beyond single family living there are very few choices for ownership that will keep us in Edina. My parents in their late 80's live above the Westin hotel and this condominium life style as greatly enhanced their quality of life. In addition, the Southdale area needs bold projects to enhance the area and maintain its vibrancy.The Art Deco style and 24 stories is a bold classic statement that would be an Iconic addition to the City. When completed it would provide a long term solution for we, who wish to remain in Edina after the single family home time of our life. In addition it would add tax revenue, and provide walkability to residents in adjacent neighborhood areas, who may enjoy the accessible retail, restaurants, and coffee shops. In conclusion, it is my hope you will support this project. Sincerely, Stephen i. Hedberg Cary Teague From: ben Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:22 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Letter of support for Estelle Edina Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. As an Edina resident I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 3. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 4. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 5. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 6. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 7. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Ben Ganje 5424 Oaklawn Ave Edina MN 55424 1 Cary Teague From: Anthony Tarvestad Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 10:02 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Residential Proposal May 18, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal. While there has been several bland apartment developments in Edina (and surrounding metro) in the last several years, there have been few, if any, condominium projects as handsome and distinctive designed as Estella. Estelle appears to eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. I would assume that Estelle will significantly add to the tax base, generating more money to enhance government- funded community features that add to Edina's quality of life — everything from schools, libraries to roads. New restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will no doubt call Estelle home. Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating–all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project is a perfect match for Edina's long term planning policy and vision for the future (build upon existing assets, improve access, walkable, human-scaled, architecturally varied, mixed-use, family friendly, green, summer/winter and connected). The Estelle project, as proposed is stunningly beautiful, and projects like this will enhance an already great city. The city needs more, not fewer, proposals like this. Thank you. Anthony Tarvestad Edina Resident 1 Cary Teague From: Patti Goldberg Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 10:10 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina My name is Patti Goldberg.i have lived in Edina since 1999.1 have bought two home. I used the fabulous public school system ,and now i am a empty nester!!! I have been wondering how I could stay around my neighborhood,and buy something,instead of rent .i saw the article in the paper and got very excited.i work downtown.) am surround by the amazing development of Ryan Company.East Town rocks .1 know they will only enhance the neighborhood,not take away!!! Please give consideration to this project !!! I can't wait! Patti Goldberg .5632 Woodcrest Drive.Edina.55424 Sent from my iPhone 1 May 17`h, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development.It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed,the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69`h Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail- We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence,visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic,the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. S. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69`h. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Bill Ziegler Edina Resident Cary Teague From: Collin Barr Sr Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 10:38 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Support for the proposed Estelle condo towers May 18`h, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. My wife and I are looking to move out of our single family home and would very much like to move into this property. We need to provide more empty nester housing solutions like this in Edina 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69`h Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. Sincerely, Collin Barr 4912 Rolling Green Pkwy Edina, MN 55436 1 Cary Teague From: Anderson, Tyler - Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:51 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina May 17th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area.This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail -We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability— Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza —Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape -The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve INP log; PHH Pomo to a T1'Nhf Home Loans , "1 <a" -Q TYLER ANDERSON 1 Cary Teague From: Paul H Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:53 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Project Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Paul Huey Edina Resident. 1 Cary Teague From: Lisa Uihlein Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 7:54 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: ESTELLE EDINA!! Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, We are writing to you to express our support for the Estelle Edina project. Finally, something new to get excited about! We fully endorse the proposal as we feel it will greatly improve the area with many added benefits to the surrounding community. Here are a few reasons we support this proposal: 1. It will be owner occupied. There have been many, many rental units built in the community in the last several years. A condominium has not been built in over 10 years. 2. They are beautifully designed. The surrounding area has several places that are outdated and run down. In our opinion, even the new developments are unattractive and will look old and dated in a few years. The city needs to be revived and desirable for future generations. 3. School Taxes! We have 3 children that are either currently enrolled or have graduated from Edina. Edina schools would certainly benefit from the extra $1,000,000 plus in taxes. We continue to be shocked at some of the basic necessities we as parents and certain fundraising committees are asked to help support to what is considered a top school system in the country. 4. New Life! The new proposal will allow for more green space, be pedestrian and bike friendly and bring a new liveliness to that area where it is currently lacking. In doing so, it will also attract businesses, restaurants and retail! We have been watching the seemingly never-ending new construction in Edina. And time after time, we are disappointed in the result. We will personally be empty nesters in a short time. And while we are not downsizing yet, we will be sooner than later. This is the first new development that we can actually get excited about. Its time for higher quality and more attractive spaces to keep Edina desirable for years to come. Sincerely- Lisa and Duke Uihlein 1 Cary Teague From: Linda Engler Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 9:39 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina support Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, As a lifelong resident of Edina and current small business owner at 50th and France, I have a strong interest in keeping Edina relevant, progressive and engaging. I'm writing in support of the proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies for the Estelle Edina Residential project. The proposal encompasses several components that are important to me and my family, and I believe to Edina as a whole: 1. High end owner-occupied condominium living 2. Pedestrian and bicycle friendly green space 3. Increased tax base from new residents and new businesses 4. Quality architecture and landscape architecture Let's keep Edina on top! Respectfully, Linda Engler Linda Engler ASID ENGLER STUDIO 3943 N 50i"STREET,STE 294 EDINA MN 55424 1 Cary Teague From: Ellie Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 9:49 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear City Council Member, I am writing to you to express my support for Estelle Edina. Personally, I believe the city needs more luxurious living available to those who want to remain in Edina. My grandparents live at the Westin, however, with that entire building sold out, it is necessary to provide adequate space for more people.There has not been a project like this in a decade. In addition, it will help the younger generation. One million dollars of taxes will go to Edina Public Schools,which can help better our education system. I hope you take into regard my support. Thank you, Ellie Wanninger 1 Cary Teague From: Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 11:02 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Support e-mail for the Estelle condo towers on France Ave - - - - please approve this project May 18`h, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and our City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed,the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home My husband and I are very interested in this type of development for our next step as empty-nesters who have lived in Edina for 28 years. This is smart policy for the City to capture tax base from new development while creating new opportunities for other young families to move into the homes vacated by those who move into these condo towers. Please vote yes to support this project. Sincerely, Brenda Barr 4912 Rolling Green Pkwy Edina, MN 55436 i Cary Teague From: Mark Parrish Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 11:48 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle-Edina Project Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending a note to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community (I live in the Cornelia neighborhood) and City, and I endorse the proposal. Thank you! Mark Parrish May 18th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina condo proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a strong positive contribution to our community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. We need more housing for our empty nesters. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—I have heard that when this project is completed,the estimated increase in property taxes will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools. 4. Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming,walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail- We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. More and better green space-The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is mostly asphalt today and impossible to walk around on foot. I would ask our City Leadership to support this project as a big improvement over the current situation and a wise empty nester housing solution for Edina. Sincerely, Sara&Noel Rahn 8 Spur Road Edina,MN 55436 Cary Teague From: Patrick McGlynn Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 1:53 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza —Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69`h. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Patrick McGlynn 5428 Brookview Ave 1 Cary Teague From: Useldinger, Kenny Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 1:35 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Edina City Council and Planning My name is Kenneth Useldinger. My wife Michelle and I have a residence in the Westin Edina Galleria. While our main residence is in Fargo, ND we love being able to spend time in Edina. We are very excited to hear about the Estelle Edina project. While we already thought enough of Edina to buy a second home there, we are very excited by what this project will add to the area. It is vision like this that makes Edina such a great place! We very much hope this project goes through! Thank you! Kenneth Useldinger President RDO Truck Centers RDO Truck Leasing 1 Cary Teague From: Nate Wissink Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 3:27 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Letter of Support for Estelle Hi Cary, Please forward this letter of support for the Estelle project to the City Council and Planning Commission members: May 17th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am writing this letter to share my support and thoughts on the proposed Estelle project. As a custom home builder in Edina over the last decade and soon to be resident of the City, I am very aware of the circumstances of the lack of for sale condominiums in the City. The Estelle proposal takes a major step forward in providing long term residents of the city a place to progress into without transitioning out a place that they have come to enjoy for decades. Additionally,the project engages the street in a more pedestrian friendly way, inviting residents and visitors to the project as well as to adjacent businesses to continue developing a more vibrant commercial district. From my understanding the developers have taken into account connectivity: to greenspace, bike paths, restaurants, and retail. Finally, the architecture of the project is striking and iconic. It has the ability to truly set a standard for future development in the area. With appreciation for your consideration of what stands to be a tremendous asset to the community, Nate Wissink Streeter&Associates, Inc. and Elevation Homes 1 Cary Teague From: Justin Dale Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:59 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Support for Estelle Edina project Dear Mr. Teague, I'm writing you today to voice my support for the proposed Estelle Edina project. My family and I have been residents in the Brookview Heights neighborhood for nearly 5 years. What brought us to the Edina was the reputation for good schools. With two young children who currently attend Normandale Elementary, I continue to be amazed watching that reputation play out each day while having such a positive impact on my children. I believe the addition of the Estelle Edina would add a significant source of tax revenue that can be used to support, benefit and enhance our already excellent school system here in Edina. In addition, the proposed architectural design would set Edina apart from the mundane and "cookie-cutter" designs seen throughout the majority of surrounding suburbs. Thank you for your time. Justin Dale 5225 Danens Dr Edina, MN 55439 i Cary Teague From: Moran, Sara Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 11:30 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina May 21 th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating— all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. 1 Cary Teague From: John Kraemer Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 10:13 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Mr. Teague- I am writing this letter in support of the proposed Estelle Edina condo development on 69th & France. As someone who lives, works, and worships in Edina, I am always in support of projects that I believe will greatly benefit our city and its residents, as well as continue to make Edina one of the most desirable locales in Minnesota to reside. The main reasons my family and I moved to Edina five years ago were the same reasons many people I know move to this fine city: Schools, stable property values, proximity to everything, and overall quality of life. A building like Estelle Edina will only help support all of what I mentioned above. An estimated tax base of over $1 million for Edina Schools from just this project alone really stands out to me. Secondly, we haven't had a condo product like this in Edina in over 10 years. I hear from "empty nesters" in Edina all the time who want less maintenance and are looking to sell their home and move into a condo. They say they want to stay in Edina but can't find anything that meets their needs, which sends them to consider moving to neighboring cities like Wayzata or Minneapolis which have the new, high-quality, maintenance-free buildings that suit them. I think a building like Estelle will provide a solid option for people who want to live the maintenance-free lifestyle and stay in the city they know and love. For all of the reasons above, I urge you to consider approval of the Estelle Edina project. I think it will only bring value to the city of Edina. Sincerely, John & Lauren Kraemer Sent from my iPhone 1 Cary Teague From: Scott MacDonald Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 3:57 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 6900 France Project Hello, I know there is a lot of discussion regarding the proposed 6900 France project, and I would like to give my recommendation for this. The new developments that are popping up on all sides of the mall, are turning a relatively sterile looking area into a vibrant community/ retail environment. Regards, Scott MacDonald 6133 Blake Ridge Rd Edina, 55436 Sent from my iPad May 19th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina condo proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a strong positive contribution to our community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. We need more housing for our empty nesters. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—I have heard that when this project is completed, the estimated increase in property taxes will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools. 4. Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. More and better green space - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is mostly asphalt today and impossible to walk around on foot. I would ask our City Leadership to support this project as a big improvement over the current situation and a wise empty nester housing solution for Edina. Sincerely, Josh Ekstrand 6106 Arctic Way Edina MN 55436 May 23rd, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I would like to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes sense for our community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters/Boomers a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! Taxes for Schools—When completed,the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence,visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic,the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69`x'. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Peter and Mary Mulheran 7137 Gleason Road Edina Mn 55439 Salon Concepts LLC hopN salonconcepts 2000 Ford Circle, Suite B Milford, Ohio 45150 May 23, 2017 Mr. Cary Teague Community Development Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Edina Estelle Development Dear Mr. Teague, My name is Brent Van Lieu and I am the CEO of Salon Concepts and owner of the property located at 3939 W. 69th Street which is contiguous to the proposed Edina Estelle development. I would like to formally express my support for the Edina Estelle development and believe it will be an asset to the City of Edina and Minneapolis as a whole. Please feel free to contact me directly at or Sincerely, Brent Van Lieu, CEO Salon Concepts Cary Teague From: John OShea Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 12:00 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Support for Estelle Edina Cary Teague, I am writing to express my support for the Estelle condominium project that has been proposed in Edina. I have not been in favor of some of the apartment projects that have been proposed (specifically the Londonderry Rd and the 50`h and France projects) because I don't feel that the neighborhoods and traffic/parking infrastructure is in place to support that many more residents in those locations. This is in direct contrast to the proposed location for the Estelle project. The southern end of France Avenue is built to accommodate more traffic and is close to 494. The impact on local parking and traffic would be very minimal. A high-end, visually appealing structure would be a nice update to that area. I also recognize that any top-rate city like Edina needs to continue to evolve and grow. Adding to the tax revenue without increasing the nominal amount we each owe is a good thing for our city, civic services, schools, etc. I urge you to support this project, John O'Shea 6512 Stauder Circle Edina, MN 55436 The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Viking Client Services,LLC. and is only for use by the individual or entity to which it is intended. Unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer. Cary Teague From: Tony Wagner Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 9:43 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Proposed Project Mr. Teague, I am writing you today to voice my support for the Estelle Project in Edina. As Edina continues to develop as a community projects like this that add beautiful new designs will be great for our community. The southdale area is a unique fit in Edina allowing for the higher density projects like this that fit with its surroundings. Similar to how the Westin Project had some initial push back I think the entire community will be happy with the completed project. Outside of just how the building looks added benefits for our community include the tax base expansion, new uses for older properties, and a park. As someone who moved to MN and selected Edina as the place to buy a home I have learned what quality builders are in our area. I think Ryan Companies, Arcadia, and John Kraemer & Sons are all quality builders and developers. I look forward to our city continuing to redevelop the southdale area into more owner occupied units in beautifully constructed new taller buildings. Thank you Tony Wagner 5120 49th Street West Anthony Wagner 1 Cary Teague From: Dave Hornig Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 8:35 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: estelle-edina Dear Cary-1 wanted to add my name to the list of supporters for the new condo project—that location should be terrific. We have lived in our present Edina home for the past 30 years and this looks very appealing to my wife and (— assuming we could afford it! 1 Cary Teague From: Sanghvi, Sahil Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 2:30 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina - support Hi Cary— Just wanted to drop you a note that I am supportive of Estelle Edina, the condo complex being considered for development by Ryan Companies. I feel there is a need for upscale living in Edina in condos, and think this fits the bill. I am currently a resident of Edina, living at 5521 Kellogg Avenue, Edina, MN. Thanks for your consideration. Best, Sahil ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Sahli Sanghvi Principal THE BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP 90 South Seventh Street Suite 3500 55402 Minneapolis. Minnesota •United States of America ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Read BCG's latest insights,analysis,and viewpoints at bcgperspectives.com ii ( Itli sri\i., . i HP n ip I, ? Jot '<.zh E.. ,W ee, iRe sp, i or :9,:41.1 <Is xl{ .: ti.is <,l =.-;i atr ttt, es' h=i,t4 11'44, rit.ntriai • ,.3j. 1 Cary Teague From: Carrie Wanninger Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 7:01 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I'm in support of the Estelle Edina project for many reasons. Here are just a few. The city needs a new condo project. I'm entering the empty nester age and would be thrilled at a new exciting location right in the thick of things by the Galleria. I love that area I'm over there all the time with the current things I do in life. I've seen the plans and they are very pleasing to the eye and offer so many amenities. I have friends that live in the Westin and love their view of the city. With the idea of 24 stories at the Estelle think of the views you could have! I'm encouraged by the idea that Estelle would create over a million dollars in tax revenue for the city of Edina. Thank you, Carrie Wanninger 6509 Navaho Tr Edina,Mn 55439 Sent from my iPhone 1 Cary Teague From: John Standal Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 9:22 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Mr Teague, I am writing in support of the proposed Estelle Edina development. The condominium project seems to be a perfect fit for this site.The developers are first rate.The timing to bring a condominium project to the market is perfect. Best wishes to you and the City of Edina for a successful finish with this development. John Standal Standal Properties, Inc Sent from my iPhone Cary Teague From: Anne-Marie Cookson Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:35 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Development Proposal Hi Cary, It's been a while since I've seen you, I got to know you when I would sit in on various City meetings during my years on the Management team with SIMON at Southdale Center. Hope this note finds you well, incredibly busy I'm sure. Our city is hopping!! I am writing to give very favorable support for the Estelle Edina development that's being proposed for the SW corner of 69th and France. I lived just a block from those banks for 17 years and have lived less than a mile from there for the past 5 years. I have worked for decades in real estate at either Southdale, Edina Realty 6800 Building, or down France Avenue at Cushman & Wakefield Northmarq. You could say I have literally spent years driving, walking and biking those blocks on a multiple times-a-day-basis! For years I have thought this proposed development corner had untapped possibilities that could enhance life in our community. Not only do I believe the timing is perfect, I also think it makes perfect sense to bring in more residential options for current Edina citizens looking to purchase vs rent and remain in their community, plus it would be a welcome option for folks who don't yet reside in Edina but would perhaps like to have an option to purchase something new and hip but not necessarily North Loop, more of a "Metroburban" setting, which is what this area of Edina has been evolving toward for some time. It's exciting to think of this development becoming a reality and I sincerely hope this proposal passes through all the steps required to break ground and offer another beautiful and practical option for Edina residents. Sincerely, Anne-Marie Cookson 4516 Valley View Road Edina, MN 55424 1 (1.°111.1"""— WARNERS' Your Appliance Spoclallst Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. We are excited for the positive contribution this project will make to the community and City. Edina is a desirable place for new families and a condominium project will greatly increase the ability for ownership for the first time in a over a decade. The proposed design is beautiful and distinguishes itself-- and Edina --from much of the squat developments happening in the Twin Cities. The future estimated additional tax base of over a million dollars annually to Edina schools maintains the high standards of the community that is so valuable to our local, family business. Estelle Edina transforms the corner of France and 69-Street into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection for our business and the City, and we appreciate the thoughtful planning that elevates the entire corridor and ensures its relevancy for years to come. We are excited to experience the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina will bring to this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new shops and restaurants will call this project home and make this neighborhood an even greater place to do business. Sincerely,/ < / Jeff Warner Partner May 17`s, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City,and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina.The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities.We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed,the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area.This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors.Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail-We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants,coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes,neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence,visitors and businesses.I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic,the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle,pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th.This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape-The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. „-Sinter;ly, � r Ben :astian Edina Resident and EHS '01 5012 Kent Ave Edina,MN 55436 Cary Teague From: Todd Pearsall Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 3:06 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Project Hello, I am writing this letter to show my support for the Estelle Edina project. As a business owner and resident of Edina, I can only see this to to be a positive impact. The beauty of the initial design is amazing, to have this flanking the most popular shopping area in MN would be a delight to see. From the taxes, green space and the eatery's this development will bring more revenue to the city. I can't see how you can go wrong. Cary, could you please pass this on to the city council? Thanks so much! Todd Pearsall Filament Lighting&Home 7123 France Ave Edina,MN 55435 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:34 PM Subject: FW: Support for Smart Development Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Original Message From: Anne K. Salmen Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:44 AM To: James Hovland; Mike Fischer Subject: Support for Smart Development As a resident of the South Cornelia neighborhood, I'm in support of the proposed high rise developments as they will be much less obstructive (visually) than mid-rises. (Just look at the tower at Galleria vs the virtual "wall" created by the Byerly's apartments!) Mid-rises truly block the horizon/skyline whilst high rises are but a brief interruption. We are fortunate to have your leadership guiding our city as we navigate this period of much growth and redevelopment. Thank you, Anne Salmen Anne Salmen 1 Cary Teague From: Stacey hammer Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 3:46 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Fwd: Estelle Edina Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: > Mr.Teague, > > I am writing this letter in support of the proposed Estelle Edina condo development on 69th &France. > >As someone who owns a hair salon in the Sola building in Brandon square on 70th and France it would be great to have more residents in the neighborhood to hopefully add to our clientele. > I have a lot of clients who are trying to downsize their homes and move closer to shopping and restaurants.There's not very many places in the Twin Cities where you can find that. Adding to the walk ability in the neighborhood would add to that also. > > I urge you to consider approval of Estelle Edina project. I think it would only add value to Edina. > > Sincerely, > > Stacey Hammer >Tapered Men's Salon > > Sent from my iPad 1 Cary Teague From: Scott Busyn Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:06 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Towers Hi Cary, I wanted to send a letter of my support for the Estelle towers project being proposed in the Southdale/Cornelia area. As a 26 year resident of Edina, we have a need for higher quality owner-occupied housing for our growing group of empty nesters (me to be soon included!). There are currently very few options for them to stay in Edina. I think the high quality of the proposed design will enhance the area and make Edina an even brighter star among the first ring suburbs. The surrounding residential area will benefit from walkable amenities much like the neighborhoods near 50th and France have over the past several years. Much more interesting than the current hodge podge of bank/medical. . Thanks for listening! SCOTT BUSYN President ( i � CREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES 1 Cary Teague From: Erik Hendrikson Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 10:47 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies Cary- Good morning! Just wanted to reach out and express my support for the Estelle project that is being proposed for France Avenue. I have worked directly on France Avenue for the past 20 years, and am also a resident of Edina since 2001. It has been exciting for me to witness firsthand the grown and improvement of the area of France Avenue between 66th and 494. I believe that the Estelle project will continue this trend of improvement as it will add a residential component that will contribute substantially to the businesses along France, and further create a great sense of community along the corridor. It sounds like the aesthetics of the project are well thought out, and certainly an improvement over a couple bland bank buildings that do nothing for the character of the area. As an Edina business owner and resident, I really believe this is a great opportunity for our city. Thanks for reading. Have a great Memorial Weekend. Erik and Leah Hendrikson 5021 Park Terrace Edina, MN 55436 Erik Hendrikson President Tradition Mortgage, LLC 7601 France Avenue South, Suite 170 Edina, MN 55435 APPLY NOW! CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: INFORMATION IN THIS MESSAGE, INCLUDING ANY ATTACHMENTS, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL USE OF THE RECIPIENT(S) NAMED ABOVE.This message may be a confident communication from one or more of the Tradition Companies,and as such is privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient of this message,or an agent responsible for delivering it to an intended recipient,you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review,dissemination,distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the message, and return any hard copy print-outs.Thank you. 1 Cary Teague From: Burnet Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 4:28 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Hi Carrie, My name is Ryan Burnet and I own Cocina del barrio on 50th and france, as well as the property. I also just recently moved to the mirror lakes neighborhood with my family. I wanted to shoot you a quick note so show my support for the Estelle project on France. As a business owner I've followed this closely and believe they will raise the bar for that part of edina. I think the aesthetic and use makes sense for the immediate neighborhood as well as Edina as a whole. Thank you for your time. Ryan Burnet 1 Cary Teague From: Al and Patrice Solyntjes Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:53 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: High rise towers on France Cary, I am currently living on 69th and Cornelia drive. I am opposed to the approval of the towers by the council for several reasons including height, density and traffic. We don't need or want this in our neighborhood. Respectfully, Al Solyntjes 6908 Cornelia Drive Virus-free. 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 3:11 PM Subject: FW: Southdale Development Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Planning Commission and Cary Teague. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Original Message From: Carol Lundquist Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:58 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Southdale Development To all: My reaction to the proposal for twin towers (24 stories!) at 69th and France is simple: NO-NO-NO and NO again. Enough! This is simply too much development in the Southdale area, with all of the other proposals within the Southdale complex, and what has been built recently (the Onyx- ugly-and the Westin). The scale of this proposal is simply out of place. Develop if you must, but consider those living nearby, the medical complex, schools, etc. Carol Lundquist 6025 Abbott Avenue South 1 Cary Teague From: Eugene Persha Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 10:28 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 69th and France Proposed Development Planning Commission Members: The proposed 20 and 24 story twin towers proposed for the 69th and France site is very troubling. First, it totally ignores the present zoning regulations. It assumes a virtual automatic Planned Unit Development(PUD) designation. It displaces the Southdale Study group from giving its recommendation based on their study of the area. It also creates a momentous problem for the development of a new Comprehensive Plan whereby it will slip under the wire to get an OK before new Comp Plan could take effect. I think we have lost sight why this area of France Ave. was given a maximum four story height limit along with density restrictions. It was done with the historical wisdom by previous Edina City Council members to have a transition zone between a business/commercial district and a large residential neighborhood. In other words, it was a buffer zone for the large neighborhoods immediately to the west of France Ave. The question becomes now: Why would the city government want to want to tamper with this to bend to a developer's perceived needs at the expense of a very large neighborhood.? There is another question why the city and various individuals tip toward development in the subtle and quiet ways before this project can get a fair airing first. This plan has as of this date has not made it toward sketch plan review, planning commission hearing, public comment, and even to city council review. A lot of things seem to be circumvented. I would ask here who is standing up on behalf of citizens to get some semblance on how they see this plan?The residents are again put into the uphill reaction mode. Whatever happened with this development project behind the scenes ought to happen the same way for the residents, Why can't they get the same input as a developer making their pitch? One of the pressing problems is that Edina, in effect, has no building code. PUD is used for anything major. That means literally "build to suit." If a developer sees it can get more with offering a few enticements, e.g., underground parking, then they expect an awful lot in return. That undoubtedly means more density and height, even in outlandish fashion as this project is proposing. There is no starting point and beginning limits. Everything is negotiable. You cannot negotiate away bedrock principles, established strictures, and neighborhood parameters as historically principles residents come to expect. The Comprehensive Plan cannot even get started by hearing from the people. It could be severely wounded coming off beginning meetings with no hope for serious meeting of the minds if this project is approved. I will challenge the city to have a referendum on building heights in Southdale area, most especially its immediate impact on the Cornelia neighborhood. It seems we have a few speaking for the many. Show where the chips lie! This proposed project is so troubling in so many ways. Is there ever a saturation point for apartments and condominiums in the Southdale area? Too much becomes too problematic. 1 Cary Teague From: Katya Murray Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 5:15 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: OPPOSED: 6900 France Ave 24-Story "Estelle" Development Cary, I'm writing regarding the high rise development currently proposed for 6900 France Avenue. I live in the Lake Cornelia neighborhood, directly behind the discussed area, and am writing in FIRM OPPOSITION to the proposal, specifically to increase the high rise (and zoning limits) from 4-stories to 24-stories. A tower 24-stories high is simply obscene for this neighborhood. The original plans accounted for transition between a proposed mixed use area and our quiet, lovely residential area. The houses in our neighborhood will be completely shadowed by something of this size, not to mention significant increases in traffic (foot and car) to an already punishing drive on France Ave and neighboring streets. Finally, our school district- and specifically Cornelia, which would be the neighborhood school for these towers - cannot handle an increase in enrollment. I'm very upset with how this proposal has been communicated to our neighborhood by the city, and how the city is clearly avoiding conversation with homeowners who would be directly impacted by the proposal to increase the towers to 24-stories. Also - I'm disheartened that the form letters you've received so far in support of the proposal by real estate agents (big surprise there!) and Edina residents who don't live anywhere near Lake Cornelia (who would not be living in the shadow of an enormous tower) can be seen as honest support of the project. Know that's not our neighborhood's support. I expect this feedback to be shared with the Planning Commission and the City Council during the meeting tonight. Regards, Katya Murray Lake Cornelia Homeowner 1 Cary Teague From: Margaret Kinney Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:39 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Forwarded message From: Margaret Kinney , n> To: Cc: Bcc: Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 23:17:29 -0500 Subject: High rise building proposed at 69th and France My name is Margaret Kinney and I live at 6805 Southdale Road. I have lived in this house for about 6 years, and I expect to live here for another 35 years. I understand that the current height restriction in this area is four stories. The proposal for the new building goes far beyond that limit. I am totally against having buildings that tall in this area. The restrictions were put in place for various reasons, and I would like the city to abide by those imposed limits. Thank you. Margaret 1 Cary Teague From: Kristi Colby _ Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 6:06 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle I do not support this project. The concentration of resistance in the France avenue area is already out of control! Traffic is terrible, pollution will increase, home ownership will decline and then where do your city taxes come from!? No thanks! The owners and developers will be the only ones benefiting!!! Sent from my iPhone Cary Teague From: Tim Erlin Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 9:13 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed Development at 66th and Valley View Mr. Teague, I'm an Edina resident with a home on Southdale road,very close to this proposed development. I attended the meeting with the developers a few weeks back. First, let me say that I welcome development along the France corridor.The addition of appropriate retail and services walking distance from my neighborhood would only improve the community and property values. I don't consider two 20+ story towers to be appropriate to the environment, however. I believe these would be the tallest buildings in Edina, and certainly the tallest in the neighborhood. I've tried standing in my front yard and imagining the view blocked by these towers, and it just doesn't make sense. I encourage you to seriously consider how you would view this development if your home were this close by. Thank you. --Tim Erlin 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 10:58 AM Subject: FW: MAYOR - The Citizens of Edina have made their wishes known on future developments I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Katharine Winston Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 7:49 AM To:James Hovland Subject: MAYOR-The Citizens of Edina have made their wishes known on future developments The citizens of Edina let their wishes be known - limit buildings to 4 stories; and you.the City Planner, and ALL of the Council Members chose to waive that requirement when it came to the 49 1/2 Street project. DULY NOTED.Adding 110 units AND more in downtown Wayzata didn't help the downtown retail stores (rent is too high to continue business while walk-in business continues to drop). Adding 110 units to 50th and France while adding a net total of a 107 parking places will benefit no one but the builders...AND what comes next?! 69th and France -44th and France? Katharine Winston 4634 FRANCE AVE S 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 10:59 AM Subject: FW: Contact Us form submission Lynette Biunno, Receptionist From: Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 8:12 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Penny Keller Stinson Organization: Website: Address 1: 5104 Tifton Drive Address 2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55439 Email: Phone: Referrer: google Message: I just read the article about the proposal to build two condo towers in the Southdale area. I'm concerned about the impact on traffic in that area as it is already pretty saturated. I also wonder about what it will cost to buy one of those condos. I certainly couldn't afford to live in the Westin and I doubt those Estelle condos will be in my range either. I've also been wondering about Pentagon Park. I drive by there frequently and have seen no activity since the buildings were demolished. I thought that was going to be higher density residences that were more affordable for families, and people who work in Edina, i.e. teachers. It seems like it would make more sense to build there than to build more high density, high priced housing in the Southdale area. 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 11:00 AM Subject: FW: Southdale Development Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Original Message From: Carol Lundquist Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 2:58 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Southdale Development To all: My reaction to the proposal for twin towers (24 stories!) at 69th and France is simple: NO-NO-NO and NO again. Enough! This is simply too much development in the Southdale area, with all of the other proposals within the Southdale complex, and what has been built recently (the Onyx- ugly- and the Westin). The scale of this proposal is simply out of place. Develop if you must, but consider those living nearby, the medical complex, schools, etc. Carol Lundquist 6025 Abbott Avenue South 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 11:00 AM Subject: FW: Condo/Towers on France Lynette Biunno. Receptionist From: -- Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 8:24 PM To: Subject: Condo/Towers on France Dear City Council Members, It is with great dismay we read that 2 tall condo towers were being considered for France Avenue near Southdale. We strongly oppose their construction. What are you all thinking??? Making Edina a "mega-suburban city" seems quite contrary to other things the city has done such as bike paths and sidewalks to say nothing of the restrictions (set backs, roof heights, anything that smacks of mega-mansions) that have been placed on folks who do tear downs and rebuild. France Avenue is difficult to navigate at times as is. The schools in Edina are at capacity as is. Where are the children of folks who move into these condos going to go? The neighborhood just west of France Avenue is a quaint neighborhood. We pity the families come winter time who will have to look at these behemoths everyday. It is bad enough that we have those ugly, "gulag" style apartments behind Byerly's and on the corner of 66th and York. We already have a "high rise" with the Westin Hotel and condos. Now you want to allow 2 more towers to be built much closer to residential areas. These towers will change that part of France and have a major impact on families living just to the west. We don't get it. What is Edina gaining from this plan? The builders gain a lot but what do the we the residents gain besides more traffic and crowded schools. If these 2 towers are allowed to be built, what will prevent future City Councils from approving other high rise towers from being build all the way down France Avenue or in other parts of the city. Please, please consider what is to be lost not what you all think is to be gained. Thank you, Jim and Jan Doudiet Edina residents 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 11:00 AM Subject: FW: Sketch Plan Review - 69th & France Redevelopment (Estelle Edina) Lvntpff . From: Sarah Way Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 12:22 PM To: Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; James Hovland; Mike Fischer; Mary Brindle Subject: Sketch Plan Review - 69th & France Redevelopment (Estelle Edina) Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I am writing in response to the article in the Star Tribune showing the proposed condo complex at 69th and France. I live in the Cornelia neighborhood. My children attend Cornelia elementary. We moved to this neighborhood for quality of life - the great schools, safety, and sense of community. I believe that building these ridiculously tall condos adjoining our neighborhood would greatly degrade the quality of life for members of my neighborhood. Gone would be the beautiful east sun rises, replaced by the shadow of the complex. The level of traffic, already quite congested on both 70th and on France would increase even more. This is especially dangerous as it is so close to the nearby elementary school with many small children walking and biking to and from school. I understand the need for condominiums, but believe our area is already saturated, what with the new units in the Southdale parking lot, the new units near Cub Foods, and the new units near Byerlys. Adding yet another tall, high density complex may bring the city tax revenue, but it would be at the expense of the adjoining residential neighborhood. I earnestly believe few people would want to live there anymore, and home prices would decline. What single family buyer wants to look out their window at a skyscraper? Also, this project completely overrides the city planning group who is coming up with a vision for this area. I urge you to wait until the planning group makes it's recommendations before continuing to allow more buildings that are outside of the current zoning recommendations. In summary, I ask you to vote down this project for the following reasons: • eyesore for the current single family home residents, resulting in decrease in resident quality of life and decreased home values • safety- too much of an increase in traffic for the children attending the nearby elementary school • unnecessary as we already have SEVERAL new condo complexes in the area • premature to change the zoning without the planning report completion Thank you for standing up for the current Edina residents instead of the developers who only wish to make a profit. Sarah Way - Cornelia neighborhood resident i Dear Cary & Planning Commission Members: RE: The "Neighborhood Meeting"for Estelle Edina Friday, May 5th—I received a call asking that I recruit several of my neighbors along Southdale Road to attend a meeting re: a possible residential development behind our homes. I was told a developer had been purchasing land—and wanted our input. The caller told me he had a"concept" and really wanted our input. Townhomes were mentioned. I was told it was really early in the process—and we needed to be part of the discussion. Townhomes mentioned again. The meeting had to be scheduled QUICKLY—within the next week. I chose May 11th-as I know people have busy schedules and this was incredibly short notice. Thursday, May 11th-As requested, we did attend that small group meeting. Instead of townhomes - it was towers—towers—towers. We were blindsided and shell shocked. When we left that evening we were asked to NOT share the information with anyone—as the "concept" had not been presented to the city. (We later found out this was not true—as the city had received the plan that morning.) Tuesday, May 16th—the "concept" was released in the Star Tribune's digital edition—and appeared in the MPLS/St Paul Business Journal where we learned the city did have the plan, and had it before our meeting. Wednesday, May 17th—the "concept" appeared in the Star Tribune Business edition. We were misled and deceived. This was a well-orchestrated campaign about a massive project that will affect our daily lives. The press releases were ready—and the reporters met with—long before our meeting. A Neighborhood Meeting was needed so it could be checked off the list. I was embarrassed about misleading my neighbors. We were collateral damage. Please know that I live at ground zero on Southdale Road. That project is massive—and will destroy our historic neighborhood. A 360 foot tower—three times the height of the Point of France—will dwarf our neighborhood and the entire Southdale area. We'll lose sunlight and be forced to deal with light, visual and noise pollution. Traffic is horrendous now. Valley View Road has become a drag strip. Drivers cut through our neighborhood to avoid the slower speed limits on 70th Street and this will only increase. This may be an attractive proposal—it just doesn't belong adjacent to a neighborhood of single family homes. Perhaps along the freeway—or another area that won't be seriously affected. And please don't believe those drawings—they are not accurate re: our neighborhood. Please have the courage to say "no". We have a right to the quiet enjoyment of our homes. Real people live here and have hopes and dreams. Think about what this would mean if this was in your neighborhood. We are long-time residents of this historic neighborhood and deserve respect. Nora M. Davis 6921 Southdale Road Cary Teague From: James Barr Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 8:56 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Project Hello Cary, I would like to voice my opposition to this project due to the height of the towers. I live in the Cornelia neighborhood and these towers would directly impact the view of blue skies I currently have. I am also concerns about the shadows that my home and neighbors homes would be left in. Please do not allow this project to build towers of this height. Thank you, James Barr 1 Cary Teague From: Kari Geadelmann Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 7:41 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, The proposed 24 and 20 story towers at 69th and France are quite troubling. From what I have read thus far, it seems as though only the positive benefits of this large scale project have been reported. Everyone I have spoken to in the Cornelia neighborhood feels strongly as though the towers are overwhelmingly too tall. A feature of this area that was attractive to us when contemplating a home purchase, was how thoughtful Edina had been years and years ago, with urban planning. Just off of France and 70th, there is low rise commercial property. The next block has 2 or 3 story apartment building, which backs up to duplexes on the next block. Single family homes are across the street from there. This creates a smooth transition from commercial property to single family homes. We see no thought of this concept with the current proposal. There is less than half of a block between single family homes and the proposed 24 and 20 story buildings. There does not seem to be much comprehensive planning for our area, as there once was. Although Estelle Edina is a high quality project, it lacks respect for the historical Southdale First residential neighborhood to the West of Valley View Road. We have significant concerns regarding this project. 24 floors high, places the first tower at approximately twice the height of Point of France. Our neighborhood will lose sunlight, and be forced to contend with visual, noise, and light pollution at all hours of the day. The noise pollution has been increasing steadily over the last few years. Drivers use Valley View Road and Southdale Road as a way to avoid France Avenue and 70th Street. The light pollution will be an issue as well. Assuming the restaurants and other businesses do well, the new area will be bustling at all hours of the day and night. Homeowners in the condos and brownstones will potentially have their patio and balcony lights on all night long. Please say no to the tall towers. My young children, and neighbors have the right to live in a peaceful neighborhood. We have lived here for 13 years, and would like to continue to do so in a quiet neighborhood. Kari Geadelmann 6917 Southdale Road 1 Cary Teague From: Camille Nast; Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 5:13 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: France Ave-70th street area A 24 foot story apartment is NOT appropriate for the BMO location which borders the Southdale neighborhood's one story ramblers. Please consider how damaging this will be to the neighborhood, to the community. Is this a precedent you wish to set in Edina? Let's not give in to the "bigger is (always) better. Zoning should remain at 4 stories. Sincerely, Camille Nash 6920 Hillcrest Lane Edina MN 55435 1 Cary Teague From: Bruce McCarthy Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 5:19 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Concern Regarding the Proposal for Two High Rise Towers at 6900 France Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission I am writing to express my concern about the proposed construction of two high rise buildings adjacent to the Lake Cornelia neighborhood of mainly single family homes. I have read the planning documents and my greatest concern is the lack of a transition zone between the neighborhood and the proposed residential/commercial development. Currently there is a 4-story limit in the area and the proposal is to change this to a 24-story limit. This project has been described as "bold, yet beautiful", however I don't think it will be so beautiful if you are sitting in your backyard looking up at these two huge towers next to you. I am not an urban planner but I wondered if there are design principles when planning a transition between a single family residential area and a large-scale high-density development of this magnitude. In fact, there seem to be urban planning guiding principles on transitions. I found them in planning documents from several small cities. For example, from a Sacramento suburb planning document: "Design building heights of new multifamily projects to be compatible with adjoining building heights t o minimize potential impacts on adjacent single-family residences." From a Sioux Falls planning document: " "Do not allow rezonings unless land use transitions are incorporated." In fact, Edina's own 2008 Updated Comprehensive Plan addresses this issue: "Scale and height should be regulated to provide complimentary transitions to adjacent neighborhoods" I am concerned that an analysis of the transitions has not been addressed in this plan. Edina deserves to have the benefit of learning from the experiences and evidence from other cities before considering this type of development. In terms of the planning process, there should be a much broader discussion with the Lake Cornelia neighbors of what could be a massive high-rise development. To my knowledge, only a hastily- arranged small group of selected Edina residents has had input into this project so far. I am concerned about the outsized influence of special interests and worried that there could be a rush to judgement before the community has had a voice in this. Bruce McCarthy, M.D. 6708 Point Dr Lake Cornelia Neighborhood Cary Teague From: JoAnn L Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 8:01 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Proposed development at 69th and France Dear Mr. Teague, I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed development at 69th and France. This is not an appropriate location for the high rise towers, directly abutting a quiet suburban neighborhood. We are very concerned with the increase in traffic, the loss of sunlight in the day, exponentially increased light pollution at night, and the general scale of visual obstruction. This will dramatically and negatively alter our quiet family oriented neighborhood. Also, the images of the plans are extremely visually deceiving, attempting to downplay the proximity of the structures to to the neighborhood. We are fairly new to Minnesota. We fell in love with this neighborhood and purchased our home here for the very qualities that this development negates. The four story height limit and density restrictions are in place to serve as a buffer between the commercial/business areas and the neighborhood. I feel like we're being had in a huge and devastating bait and switch. If we had known something of this magnitude was in the pipeline, we never would have purchased our home here. This is a quote from pages 52 and 53 of the spring 2017 issue of AboutTown Magazine, regarding the Comprehensive Plan. "We feel strongly that community residents - people who will be affected by planning outcomes - really deserve a place at the table, so there will be frequent outreach to community members," Smith said. (Bill Smith of Biko Associates) I will state there has NOT been frequent outreach to community members about this. In addition, this proposed development is dramatically larger in scale than the idea of "small area plans" that the article discusses. I find it telling that the bulk of the support of this development are from those who will not be living in the shadow of it. Is the quality of life of the residents here not worth as much as the potential profits in the hands of the developers? Sincerely, JoAnn Russell Cornelia Drive 1 Cary Teague From: Krogan, Alison J Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:37 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: 69th and France Hello — As a resident on 67th and Cornelia Drive for nearly 15 years, I understand that there is a plan to develop high rise buildings on 69th and France. While I am supportive of change and the addition of retail, restaurants and housing to the neighborhood, I am very concerned about the development of tall, high rise buildings specifically. I do not want to lose the sunlight that reaches my home, nor do I want to see large, looming buildings outside of my windows. Some of the reason we choose to live in this neighborhood is the focus on the outdoors —the proximity to Lake Cornelia and Rosland Park activities, biking/walking trails, and ability to walk to local shopping and restaurants. I want to maintain or add more of those reasons to live in Edina. However, I do NOT want the visual obstacles from larger, more industrial high rise buildings. I want to see the sky. Please consider limiting the height of the buildings being planned to no higher than the Point of France buildings so that existing residents can continue to enjoy the sunlight and views that our Edina neighborhood provides today. If you would like to discuss or have questions, please call me at the number below or reply to this email. Thank you, Alison Krogan I Opturn Senior Director. Consumer Marketing )1 This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. Cary Teague From: Jeanne &John Cummings Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:52 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Re: Proposed High Rise Redevelopment at 69th and France Hi Cary: Please alert the Planning Commission members to the effect the height of this high rise development will have on our quiet Cornelia residential neighborhood e.g. probable visual,light and air pollution as well as increased traffic. We are concerned! Thanks! John and Jeanne Cummings 6940 Cornelia Drive 1 Cary Teague From: Belinda Erlin Sent: Thursday,June 01, 2017 4:49 PM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Mr. Hovland, Mr. Teague, Planning Commission and City Council Members, I live at 6920 Southdale Road in Edina with my husband and my two young children aged 7 & 9. I am writing to express my concern about the proposed 20 & 24 story high development known as Estelle Edina. My house and my neighborhood will be directly impacted by this development if built as proposed. Hopefully, some PROS: Possibility for attractive retail outlets - coffee shops, bakery, restaurant etc. Hopefully, improved walkability along Valley View and improved, safer pedestrian crossings. Valley View has become a real race track. Overall improvement to the area with a thoughtfully built development Concerns: Comprehensive traffic flow: Extra traffic flow not only from these two condo towers and the row of townhouses, but also the new retail outlets as well as the other new apartment and commercial spaces that have been built recently. These include the Aurora building, apartments on the SE side of the Southdale parking lot, the Westin, apartments behind the new Byerlys and the newly proposed free-standing Restoration Hardware. The combined traffic effect on this area is important to evaluate. I would like to know that there are comprehensive traffic studies being conducted and that traffic will not be short-cutting off Valley View or 70th to redirect along Southdale Road. Children live here. Vehicles already drive too quickly around Southdale Road and there is no enforcement of speed limit, no signage and no encouragement or monitoring to slow down Light pollution: Already at night when I stand in my front yard I can see the lights coming of France Ave, Southdale Mall parking lot, the Westin, especially in winter. How much extra light will there be throughout the darkness of night if we have two huge towers hovering right over our back yards? Not only the lights from these buildings, but also the parking lots and improved side walks. Noise pollution: Will there be curfews set on when heavy commercial trucks can operate in the area of the retail and condo living? Delivery trucks, garbage trucks and before that, construction trucks, beeping reverse sounds, etc.? Property Values: There should be a property value impact study done. Will our houses lose any of their value as a result of being right on the edge of 2 high rise buildings? We have just personally invested a large sum of money in a renovation of our house with the hope of staying right here until our kids graduate from high school (currently at Highlands Elementary). We have invested in our community and our home. There are other neighbors investing, tearing down and building new. How will a 24 & 20 story development right next door impact our home values? 1 I believe there is an opportunity here for a positive impact on our community as long as the matters I've outlined above are analyzed and carefully considered. I do not feel the HEIGHT of the towers is acceptable in such close proximity to our homes. Thank you for your consideration of the above matters, Sincerely, Belinda Erlin 6920 Southdale Road 2 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:14 PM Subject: FW: Estelle Edina Project Lynette Biunno, Receptionist N.gov Original Message From:James Barr ' Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 8:56 PM To:James Hovland Subject: Estelle Edina Project Hello Mayor, I would like to voice my opposition to this project due to the height of the towers. I live in the Cornelia neighborhood and these towers would directly impact the view of blue skies I currently have. I am also concerns about the shadows that my home and neighbors homes would be left in. Please do not allow this project to build towers of this height. Thank you, James Barr 1 Cary Teague From: Cydney Einck Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 2:58 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 2 new high rises I was not able to attend the first meeting and will not be available for the second meeting being held tonight (5/24), so I feel I may be coming at this without all the necessary information needed; however, I am more than a little concerned about all the housing that is springing up between 66th and 70`h. France and Xerxes Avenues are already congested with cars. We have dogs doing their business outside these apartment/condos when there is no real green space for this activity. This is nothing against dogs- it has to do with the lack of planning to accommodate dog friendly buildings. To that point, I'm not observing any huge effort to a) create holding ponds for run off, b) create more green space along the roads where new housing is built or c) address balcony curb appeal with any of these multi-floor buildings. As you can tell, I will need to be convinced these will be good for the community because right now I see them as a detriment. Thanks for allowing us to have input. Cyd Einck Lake Cornelia resident. Cyd Einck,General Manager 1 Cary Teague From: Janet Conn Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 3:04 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton;James Hovland; Mike Fischer; Mary Brindle Subject: Proposed Towers at 69th & France Dear Mr. Teague: I think the proposal to build two towers, 20- and 24-stories high, in the block between 69th and 70th on France is a really bad idea. The towers would loom over the entire Southdale area, completely out of scale. Towers with a maximum of 10 stories, on the other hand, might work, depending on the design, etc. While we are busily building and upgrading apartment buildings, we need a lot more truly affordable units in Edina. Can't we build something that is not a luxury establishment? Thank you. Janet Conn 5804 Oak Ln 1 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 9:45 AM Subject: FW: High rise building proposed at 69th and France �f3 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 1 From: Margaret Kinney Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:17 PM To ames Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: High rise building proposed at 69th and France My name is Margaret Kinney and I live at 6805 Southdale Road. I have lived in this house for about 6 years, and I expect to live here for another 35 years. I understand that the current height restriction in this area is four stories. The proposal for the new building goes far beyond that limit. I am totally against having buildings that tall in this area. The restrictions were put in place for various reasons, and I would like the city to abide by those imposed limits. Thank you. Margaret 1 Cary Teague From: Steven Murray Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 10:11 AM To: Cary Teague Cc: Subject: OPPOSED - 24 story building(s) in Edina Cornelia NEIGHBORHOOD Hi - I'm a homeowner in the Lake Cornelia neighborhood of Edina. I am strongly opposed to the proposed towers being built in the "backyard" of our neighborhood, at the corner of 69th and France Ave. The first I heard of the project was in a Star Tribune article two weeks ago. To be honest, I find it a little concerning that the planning commission didn't seek feedback from a broader section of our neighborhood for the project. Perhaps the feedback would be too obvious....hard to imagine any homeowner would want a 24 story building built in the backyard of their family home. Is there someone on the commission in support of the project that actually lives in the Lake Cornelia neighborhood that I could speak with about the project? I find it concerning, although not surprising,that the form letters you've received so far in support of the project are from those who stand to benefit from the project (real estate agents, local developers, etc.). They do not represent the voices of the Lake Cornelia community. Also, my understanding is that the location was originally zoned for 4 stories, not 24. 50th and France is getting a 6 story building, and we're getting 24 stories. Let's be reasonable here. Have you tried to drive on 70th Street or France Ave recently? It's not fun, or quiet. I'd like to be added to future communication on this because it certainly seems to have been kept a secret from most of our neighborhood up to this point. Regards, Steve Murray http://www.startribune.corn/two-condo-towers-to-rise-across-from-southdale-galleria-in-edina/422548054/ 1 Cary Teague From: Kari Geadelmann Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 8:57 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: BMO and Bremer bank development Dear Mr. Teague, I am writing to follow-up after the planning commission meeting on May 24th. I continue to be significantly troubled by the BMO bank and Bremer bank development, and strongly oppose the proposal for the towers. This project is potentially precedent setting for our city. One can only imagine what will become of other areas in Edina, if such towers as these continue to be approved by amending the current height regulations in Edina. The towers are not appropriate for our residential area! I appreciate that the planning commission sought greater detailed information about the shadows from the buildings. However, the fact that the neighborhood residents will be forced to look at two tall towers 24 hours a day, and 7 days a week was completely overlooked. I wish that fact had been examined at greater length. I would have hoped that the commissioners would have pushed the builder to examine a proposal that includes multiple low rise brownstone homes on the property. (Perhaps something similar to the 54th and France brownstone development.) These towers would be something my children would have to look at day in and day out. We chose to live in Edina--a quiet, suburban area, and it saddens me that the planning commission is apparently wanting to move away from that. On May 24th, the builder could not think of any other projects where such tall buildings are in such close proximity to a single family neighborhood. Current, and well thought out, Edina regulation, calls for gradual transition from commercial property to residential homes. The same vision calls for the maximum height of buildings to be 4 stories tall. The proposal overwhelmingly exceeds this concept by SIX times! This is unacceptable. Others in my neighborhood have expressed concern regarding our home values. I am aware the builder is going to do research into this matter. I do, however, have reservations regarding the validity of such results. The builder certainly has interest in obtaining positive results from this study. I would ask the city of Edina to perform a non-partisan assessment as to what this project will do to our neighborhood's home values. I urge you to say 'No' to the two tall towers. I understand that many have ben distracted by the beautiful design and have forgotten to focus on the facts. This proposal is for 360 feet of height within half a block of a single family neighborhood. From the corner of our property we are just 165 feet from the proposed development. (This is not equivalent to the three blocks quoted by one of the commission members.) My family would be affected by this development. My children would play in the shadow of that tower. The additional noise, air pollution, traffic, etc. will affect our daily lives. This development will increase traffic on Southdale Road, Valley View Road, 70th Street, and France Avenue. Please respect the wishes of the neighborhood to the West of this build site and say 'No' to the towers. Kari Geadelmann 1 Cary Teague From: RICHARD E STEIN Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:46 PM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Mike Fischer Cc: /lark Chamberlain Subject: Re: 69th and France Edina City Planning Commission and City Council Members May 27, 2017 Re: 69th and France We are opposed to the buildings and rezoning proposed, in the sketch plan proposal, on 69th and France, presented at planning commission meeting on Thursday May 24th, 2017, that I, Richard Stein and on behalf of my wife, attended. The height of the building, density, and the expected increased noise and traffic in the Cornelia neighborhood, along with supporting proposed zoning changes are the issues. We live on the corner of Mavelle Drive and Bristol Boulevard, and our skyline will clearly be obstructed 24/7, 365 days a year and shadows cast on the neighborhood, along with the noise generated by the use of the buildings. In addition, the developer has not addressed the possible wind tunnel effects that will likely occur because of the two proposed buildings. The block that the proposal sits on is intended to provide a transition between high density use east of France Avenue and residential use to the west, in the Cornelia neighborhood. The proposal is not a transition, but it is high density use and not a transition. It is hard to imagine that when the proposal is finalized, the traffic study would show an acceptable traffic increase. 70th Street would take a large share of that increase and just recently the street was improved to calm or discourage traffic use. This increase would be burdened by the neighborhood and Cornelia School. In the proposal, a point was made that the increased density would double the taxes paid by the property which would benefit the city Edina and Edina schools. We have lived in the neighborhood for more than 20 years and our daughters went to Edina schools and cherish the values of both the neighborhood and schools. If increased taxes paid are the motivation to have the proposed buildings, then I propose that increasing our taxes is a better alternative as we wish to continue to live here. 1 One of the points made by the developer is this building will be a landmark. We ask that if the planning commission and the city council are providing landmark decisions for the future, then look at the preservation of residential neighborhoods as a landmark decision. If Edina did not have residential neighborhoods, Edina would not be the city people want to live in. In addition, we ask that the Planning Commission and City Council follow the principals outlined in Edina's 2008 Updated Comprehensive Plan, instead of accepting exceptions and deviations as presented on Thursday May 24th, 2017. In closing, please deny the plan and continue to provide acceptable transitions between high density use and residential use. Richard Stein and Marianne Rother 7017 Bristol Blvd. Please share this with the rest of the planning commission members. 2 Cary Teague From: Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 10:18 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Bremer & BMO Development Hello Cary, Please add our names to the list of Edina residents OPPOSED to the height and density of the proposed project on the Bremer Bank property on France Avenue. This abuts a vibrant residential area that has already been subjected to numerous high density housing projects—notably the multiple housing block units at 7100 France. The proposed development at the Bremer site would create an eyesore with it's height WELL OVER what is recommended in the Edina comprehensive plan, and would block sunlight for many neighbors in the area. Please do not misconstrue this opposition as "opposition to change"; it seems that phrase is used as a patronizing way to trivialize residents who's neighborhood enjoyment would be greatly affected by this development. This is opposition to the disregard of Edina's own development plan. Please forward my comments on to the planning commission. Thank you, Kirby Schulberg 4421 Fondell Dr, Edina, MN 55435 1 Cary Teague From: PAULA. Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 9:36 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Bremer/ BMO Development Cary: PLEASE think of the residents as you consider this massive development. When I first saw it in the Business Journal it seemed so out of place on France Ave that I almost didn't believe it to be possible. Now that the developer has actually appeared with the proposed project I'm horrified. Something of that scale/height has no place at that intersection. I cannot believe we're trying to incorporate a downtown Minneapolis feel to France Ave. 360 foot tower in a residential neighborhood? It's so far from being within the existing Comp Plan, I just cannot fathom that the Planning Commission would find it acceptable, or reason to Amend the Plan for it. And that's not even bringing into the picture traffic on France which is already overloaded. HELP! Please share my concerns with the Planning Commission members. I have their names, but not emails. I will be emailing the Mayor and Council as well. Thank you, Paula Robinson 7205 Glouchester Dr. Paula J. Robinson Vice PrPcirionf wells Fargo Private Bank 17900 Xerxes Ave. Suite 10001 Bloomington, MN 55435 Paula.i.robinson©wellsfargo.com Wells Fargo Private Bank provides products and services through Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and its various affiliates and subsidiaries. This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately, by reply email and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. 1 Cary Teague From: Geadelmann, Levi Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:04 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: BMO/Bremer Bank Development Attachments: backyardview.pptx Dear Mr.Teague, I am writing you concerning the proposed development at the Bremer/BMO Bank site on France and 69th Street. My home at 6917 Southdale Rd. is less than 500 feet from the base of the proposed 360 foot tower. I am dismayed at the thought that my home and yard may now be put on display for half the residents that will move into the west side of the first of the two towers. This first tower would become the 24th tallest building in the entire state; tall enough that aircraft warning lights will be required! Thankfully, Edina already has a well thought out plan and had the foresight to document that vision in the comp plan and circulate it amongst the residents so they could make well informed decisions about their present and future living situations. As the planning commission stated at the May 24thsketch review, that plan calls for a "stepped" approach when transitioning from residential into commercial areas and states a maximum height of four stories. I can appreciate that there could be varying interpretations of a "stepped transition", but going from my single level rambler to a 360 foot tower in 500 feet? That first "step" is a real doozy... The bright lights of the BMO Bank, along with the 17 story Westin (2,200 feet away) are already in plain view since we're not allowed to build a fence any higher than six feet. Over the past 8 years we've planted many trees to combat this situation but I'm afraid I won't live long enough in order for a grove of giant redwoods to mature and give my family some sense of privacy in our own yard and home. For your reference, I've attached a recent photograph of the view from just inside our back door. Even with the full foliage we have at this time of the year, you can see both BMO and the Westin. Using Google Maps for measurements, I quickly sketched the positioning and height of that first tower. I encourage you to have the developer take some aerial photography from the site at various heights before any decision is made. There are several inexpensive options to have a licensed pilot utilize a drone so you can see the invasive view first hand rather than relying on a computer model. It's one thing to move into a house at a location where tall commercial buildings already exist, but to erect two of them within a block of an entire neighborhood? That's not OK. I hope the city agrees and chooses to keep their word and stay consistent with the current comp plan already approved. Thank you for your time, Levi Geadelmann 6917 Southdale Rd. Edina, MN 55435 1 Cary Teague From: Cosette 24601 Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:20 PM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart; Mike Fischer Subject: Bremer and BMO Development To whom it may concern, Here's the deal... my dad is a commercial developer. He has advised me that residents of a city who complain about everything are quickly tuned out. That said, I hope this email does not fall on deaf ears. The Bremer and BMO development is not in accordance with the Edina comp plan. This development would be more than 4 stories tall!!!! I am concerned about my neighbors who live directly near this development. They would literally live in the shadow of it. The first tower will be 360 feet high - three times higher than the Point of France. Does this belong adjacent to a residential neighborhood of single family homes? Considering how much Edinans value their property (and given how much we pay for it), I think the answer to this is "no". Please ask this development to re scale their proposed project to "fit" more nicely into the neighborhood. I know that the City wants this business. I know that projects within a city are indicative of progress and growth (and tax revenue" " ! ! I) I get it. But please try to keep ALL of Edina charming and attractive. That way people will continue to want to live here:) Cosette DeCesare 7433 West Shore Drive i Cary Teague From: Chad Smith Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 2:46 PM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Bremer& BMO Development Hello I wanted to voice my opposition to the proposed towers in at the Bremer & BMO locations. Tower height at 360 feet. Currently the comp. plan restricts it to 4 stories. Imagine the shade the current property owners would be subject to year round. The transition area is less than one block. I believe three blocks is the minimum right now. Increased traffic in the neighborhoods where there are several children. Thanks Chad Smith 7017 Bristol Blvd 1 Southdale First Addition EMERGENCY ALERT! Are you concerned about the re-development of the Bremer and BMO Harris Bank properties at 69" & France? The proposed high rises (20 & 24 stories), plus more retail, row houses and a restaurant) will affect our neighborhood with loss of sunlight, shadows, more traffic, visual, light and air pollution. We will lose the quiet enjoyment of our homes. (See press release on the back of this flyer) WE NEED TO ACT QUICKLY! The proposal will go to the Planning Commission - Sketch Plan Review - next Wednesday, May 24, 7 pm at City Hall. We can't speak - but we need to be there. We also need to attend the City Council - Sketch Plan Review meeting on Tuesday, June 6t", 7 pm at City Hall. We can't speak - but we need to be there. In the meantime - please call or email our city officials Cary Teague, City Planner cteague@EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0460 Jim Hovland, Mayor jhovland@EdinaMN.gov 612-874-8550 Mary Brindle, Council Member mbrindle@EdinaMN.gov 952-941-7746 Mike Fischer, Council Member mfischer@EdinaMN.gov 952-833-9569 Kevin Staunton, Council Member kstaunton@EdinaMN.gov 952-836-1020 Bob Stewart, Council Member rstewart@EdinaMN.gov 952-833-9559 A personal note works too, send in care of Edina City Hall, 4801 W 50th Edina, MN 55424. We'll be working to keep you informed about this project. Send your email address to noradavis73@gmail.com or boblmoore@hotmail.com to join our email group. No access to email? Just call Bob Moore at 952-922- 2937 and we'll keep you in the loop. V For Immediate Release Bernardi and Ryan Companies Collaborate with City of Edina and Neighborhood Groups to Re-vision Greater Southdale Area Minneapolis, MN (May 15, 2017)—Luigi Bernardi, president of Edina-based Arcadia, LLC, in collaboration with Ryan Companies, a national builder, developer, designer and real estate manager based in Minneapolis, are pleased to announce their role in the re-visioning of the Greater Southdale Area in Edina, Minnesota. Additional partners include John Kraemer& Sons and Lakes Sotheby's International Realty. Bernardi and Ryan are proposing a mixed-use owner-occupied residential project for the corner of France Avenue and 69th Street near the heart of the Southdale district. Lifelong Edina resident Bernardi grew up in the Cornelia neighborhood; he recently completed the well-received senior living and care development, Aurora on France. Bernardi and Ryan have been meeting with and listening to Edina neighbors and groups to discuss the project called Estelle Edina. Anchored on France Avenue and across from the Galleria, Estelle Edina will be home to luxury residences—the first of its kind in Edina in 10 years—six brownstones, and 12,000 square feet of neighborhood retail, including a signature restaurant at the corner of France and 69th. The existing Bremer Bank and BMO Harris Bank will open new spaces in the project. The project will establish a standard for enduring design, quality construction and extraordinary amenities. Estelle's slender, architect-designed, 24-story residence utilizes a narrow floor plan to keep its profile unobtrusive. Deco-inspired step-backs give the slim stone and glass building a sophisticated yet timeless demeanor that adds distinctiveness to Edina's skyline. Each home in Estelle will be a corner residence with only four homes per floor on lower levels, reducing to two per floor on upper levels, and one penthouse home for a total of 82 in the first building. All the generously-sized homes will feature expansive windows, high ceilings, sumptuous finishes and heated, outdoor living-rooms. In addition, six brownstones are planned along a quiet interior motor court with plantings and trees. The front entry stairways lead to the three-and-a-half story brownstones; each with generous decks that look out to a private backyard. Residents will enjoy underground parking, a pool and green roof. Estelle gives Edina residents who are seeking a new owner-occupied and maintenance-free option the ability to stay in Edina, while freeing up their existing homes for families interested in joining the community. The entire Bernardi/Ryan project also supports the City's plan of dividing the district's "superblocks" into smaller parcels with walkable tree-lined interior streets,plazas, green space and generous setbacks from France and 69th. Rather than street-hugging sidewalks, the project introduces walkways at least 20 feet from the roadway with 10 feet of plantings next to buildings. For example, at the"hard"corner of France and 69th, the project design offers a welcoming, aesthetically pleasing solution set further back from the busy street that includes a public plaza, a fountain surrounded by seating, and generous plantings adjacent to a locally-owned, signature restaurant with patio seating. The restaurant would be one of four mixed uses incorporated into phase one. Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:35 PM Subject: FW:The Two Towers aka Estelle Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Juv From: Michael Ebnet Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:16 PM To: Kevin Staunton; James Hovland; Mike Fischer Subject: The Two Towers aka Estelle Gentlemen: I can't help noticing that people in favor of building the two towers at 6900 France don't live close to 6900 France. I do. And I am wary. I have a degree in architecture. I was one of the first tenants at Cedar Square West, a new town in town, designed by Ralph Rapson. Lots of glitz. Lots of promises. I was stoked. I was in awe. Until I lived there. Most residents agreed with me and soon abandoned the place. Today no one thinks it was a success. Look closely, gentlemen, beyond the glitz of 6900—beyond cutting edge terms such as the woonerf. Look at • The number one selling point: that it will allow empty nesters to stay in Edina allowing families to move in to the empty nesters' houses. Sounds good. It's false. o Over half of Edina cannot afford living there. o Zillow says the median home price in Edina is $435k. The lowest-priced unit at the Westin is $479,900, meaning half the people in Edina would have to pay more to leave their home to live at the cheapest Westin condo. The Estelle would undoubtedly be more expensive. Instead, imagine • if you lived in the shadow of those buildings. Would you feel as if you had any privacy left? Would you feel that traffic and noise has increased? Would you feel that the price of your home has decreased? • if you lived in the Estelle and wanted to go somewhere how would you? o the woonerf is dinky you are surrounded by busy streets o walking any distance is tougher when you are older and retired so walking to Byerly's or Cub or Whole Foods is more than you care to do most days o walking to the other side of France or to the park is scary because of the heavy traffic o you miss the quiet area of Edina that you just left because you could walk there in peace 1 o driving is harder because you are older and because France is regularly heavy with traffic, the Crosstown is stop and go for hours, and ditto for 494 o in two or three years the word is out—as it was in Cedar Square West—this is not a good place to live o unit prices start to fall o young people can't afford to live there o old people feel imprisoned by the roads I know the above seems extreme. But it may be a more real approximation of what happens than the glitzy presented by the proponents. Wouldn't buildings of this height be better suited for the old public works site? Isn't this the nose in the camel's tent? How will you refuse other builders the same consideration of changing height restrictions? Please eliminate from consideration any change to height restrictions on the west side of France Avenue. Mike Ebnet 4501 Claremore Court Edina 2 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:19 PM Subject: FW: Proposed development at 69th and France Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunn(0,EdinaMN.gov l EdinaMN.gov From: JoAnn l Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 8:04 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Proposed development at 69th and France Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed development at 69th and France. This is not an appropriate location for the high rise towers, directly abutting a quiet suburban neighborhood. We are very concerned with the increase in traffic, the loss of sunlight in the day, exponentially increased light pollution at night, and the general scale of visual obstruction. This will dramatically and negatively alter our quiet family oriented neighborhood. Also, the images of the plans are extremely visually deceiving, attempting to downplay the proximity of the structures to to the neighborhood. We are fairly new to Minnesota. We fell in love with this lovely, quiet neighborhood and purchased our home here for the very qualities that this development negates. The four story height limit and density restrictions are in place to serve as a buffer between the commercial/business areas and the neighborhood. I feel like we're being had in a huge and devastating bait and switch. If we had known something of this magnitude was in the pipeline, we never would have purchased our home here. This is a quote from pages 52 and 53 of the spring 2017 issue of AboutTown Magazine, regarding the Comprehensive Plan. "We feel strongly that community residents - people who will be affected by planning outcomes - really deserve a place at the table, so there will be frequent outreach to community members," Smith said. (Bill Smith of Biko Associates) I will state there has NOT been frequent outreach to community members about this. In addition, this proposed development is dramatically larger in scale than the idea of "small area plans" that the article discusses. I find it telling that the bulk of the support of this development are from those who will not be living in the shadow of it. Is the quality of life of the residents here not worth as much as the potential profits in the hands of the developers? Respectfully, 1 JoAnn Russell Cornelia Drive 2 Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:16 PM Subject: FW: Estelle Edina Lynette Biunno, Receptionist From: Kari Geadelmann - Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 7:43 AM To: James Hovland Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Mayor, The proposed 24 and 20 story towers at 69th and France are quite troubling. From what I have read thus far, it seems as though only the positive benefits of this large scale project have been reported. Everyone I have spoken to in the Cornelia neighborhood feels strongly as though the towers are overwhelmingly too tall. A feature of this area that was attractive to us when contemplating a home purchase, was how thoughtful Edina had been years and years ago, with urban planning. Just off of France and 70th, there is low rise commercial property. The next block has 2 or 3 story apartment building, which backs up to duplexes on the next block. Single family homes are across the street from there. This creates a smooth transition from commercial property to single family homes. We see no thought of this concept with the current proposal. There is less than half of a block between single family homes and the proposed 24 and 20 story buildings. There does not seem to be much comprehensive planning for our area, as there once was. Although Estelle Edina is a high quality project, it lacks respect for the historical Southdale First residential neighborhood to the West of Valley View Road. We have significant concerns regarding this project. 24 floors high, places the first tower at approximately twice the height of Point of France. Our neighborhood will lose sunlight, and be forced to contend with visual, noise, and light pollution at all hours of the day. The noise pollution has been increasing steadily over the last few years. Drivers use Valley View Road and Southdale Road as a way to avoid France Avenue and 70th Street. The light pollution will be an issue as well. Assuming the restaurants and other businesses do well, the new area will be bustling at all hours of the day and night. Homeowners in the condos and brownstones will potentially have their patio and balcony lights on all night long. Please say no to the tall towers. My young children, and neighbors have the right to live in a peaceful neighborhood. We have lived here for 13 years, and would like to continue to do so in a quiet neighborhood. Kari Geadelmann 6917 Southdale Road 2 From: Glen Whitesell Monday, May 22,2017 To: Robert Stewart;Mike Fischer;Mary Brindle;Kevin Staunton;James Hovland;&Cary Teague Regarding: proposed Estelle project,6900 France. Dear City Council Members and City Planners, Nice project,wrong location. • It might fit better in an area closer to downtown...along the river where people actually walk or maybe San Diego which has better weather. • The slides are populated with people and cars to give the impression of lively activity.They make it look like a weekend on Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale or 5th avenue, Naples.This is not the case anywhere around here except on a nice summer weekend at Centennial Lakes or a few days at 50th and France. Another factor of high-rise is"urban wind canyons".This is well known to architects designing towers downtown in close proximity to other such buildings including low rise.Walking between these towers may not be as pleasant as they show. Especially in six to eight months of marginal weather.Architects cannot social engineer that outdoor activity in Minnesota weather. • Do not minimize the physical height of these towers by focusing on number of floors.Anything in the 200 to 300 foot range is not appropriate for transition to residential. The tall tower(360 ft.)would surpass not only the Westin(236'), but Bloomington's Wells Fargo Plaza(300')and the Double Tree Hotel(Old Radisson South,233').The 8500 Tower (with pyramid roof)is 381'tall.Drive by the backside of the Onyx which is"only"six stories or about 72 feet. • Drive through our residential area and then drive by some of the towers mentioned above.A decision that affects hundreds of residents who have invested in their homes for years deserves this.The core quality of Edina is not in the commercial architecture but in the quality of the citizens and the schools.We have invested in sidewalks and bike paths.We are a premier community for such decisions. Do not give it away by expanding the commercial area.Only the developer wins. Do not allow this to proceed as designed. a - ..0 : , -- , , .t�'., ti ,f,--,... r .:r , • -d ...' .! ° '7:1, "'s-t,..", :./..• .. ',','");„,e. '7 N-....„-.- ..."" ' ' ,,." - .. . . 4i ,7,.... . .,, '7 ''''''r' ,.I..' ,..." ' .'-', ,...:...'..'''' . ' ./ , , Ldd r •IfNigf tJMt1/1 4.0:44.t4i Y Cornelia from 4000 feet:Red dot is 6900. ., . "` •_Wim'"` r: .0.0.—„,,,„ c - 3 r 8500 Tower,381 ft �A1 Double Tree Hotel,233 ft r r ''r 900 ft 3 ()%.i0-";.*::: ,.- _ T' - Wells Fargo Plaza,300 ft If I were young and single,working downtown,I would live here.To everything there is a time and place. �{7F lMG<M.IET. 34 ft' , " 40 4 T ,w s•�"i'lliS af r � jrit s s as ii Y .' .!mss('! 1 ^4 ! +t — 4+A� i it , • :, µ dr � t �i • ! Glen Whitesell, Retired 7116 Heatherton Trail Cary Teague From: Jocelyn Cookson Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 12:53 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle project proposal support!! Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. As soon as my finace read the article about it in the star tribune he forwarded it to me with the subject line, " we can retire in Edina now!" 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. I have two children in the Edina Public School District. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. Having resided at 7001 Lynmar lane for four years, I can attest to the idea of cleaning up that area from the current lots and would not oppose the sight of high rises whatsoever. 1 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Thank you for your consideration. Please contact me with any additional questions! Jocelyn Cookson 6105 Concord Ave. 2 Cary Teague From: Mary Scheid Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 7:51 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Support for Estelle-Edina Hello Cary, My husband Chris Scheid and I are writing to share our support for the Estelle-Edina project, as it contributes positively to the community and our City of Edina. Here are some of the reasons for our support: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. i Thank you, Mary Scheid 6525 Navaho Trail 2 Cary Teague From: Farr, Susan Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 1:08 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Support for Estelle Edina Dear Cary Teague, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. We would love an option like this for adults both in and outside the community seeking to sell their longtime homes to downsize and rent. Also, we see a consistent pattern in adult children wanting to move closer to their aging parents. With York Gardens Senior Living and Edina Senior Living, known as Aurora on France, so close in proximity, this could be the perfect spot to call home! 1 Sincerely, Susan Farr VP of Business Development eEBENEZER 2722 Park Avenue I Minneapolis) MN 55407 e tip C WARN The information transmitted in this e-mail is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material, including'protected health information'.If you are not the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any review,retransmission, dissemination,distribution,or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,please destroy and delete this message from any computer and contact us immediately by return e-mail. 2 Cary Teague From: Douglas Fulton (Avison Young) Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 9:29 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Residential Proposal Mr. Teague, thank you for reviewing the below and passing to the Edina City Council and Planning Commission Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed,the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69`1' Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail- We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic,the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69`h. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape-The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. 1 I am very excited about this project. Thank you for reviewing this email and recommendation. Sincerely, Doug Fulton 4706 Golf Ter Edina, MN 55424 alit sonyoung.com AVISON 9f TE tCOMP GEC7 YOUNG xtP.l,iES C3 E3 it 0 Avison Young•Michigan,LLC. Le{;a..1 scla i_me r, 2 Cary Teague From: Pat Boldischar Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2017 10:10 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Project Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf— Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 1 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Patrick Boldischar 4621 Casco Ave 2 Cary Teague From: MHW < Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 9:34 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina project Dear Mr. Teague, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living - It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality - Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools - When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life - Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability - Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating - all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf - Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza - Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Michael H. Wittmer 4706 Sunnyside Rd. Edina, MN 55424 2 May 17th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. Thank you so much for your consideration! I couldn't be more excited about the project. We have lived in Edina since 1990. We love it here. Our oldest daughter just finished her first year of college and our son is a junior at EHS. We have always found great housing in Edina for the various stages of our lives, starting with a duplex and moving up 4 times. As we contemplate our children leaving,we plan to sell our current home. We thought our options were Lake Minnetonka or downtown Minneapolis. However,the Estelle looks to be the perfect fit for us. We would love to stay in Edina and keep paying taxes here to support the school system that has been so great to our family. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed,the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69`x' Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail- We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic,the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69"'. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape-The proposal appears to add over 200 trees,a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Lisa Christianson 5652 Woodcrest Drive Edina,MN 55424 Cary Teague From: Conzemius, Joseph @ Minneapolis Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 5:22 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina May 17th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 1 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Joe Conzemius, J.G. Associate CBRE I Brokerage Services—Office Properties 800 LaSalle Avenue, Suite 1900 I Minneapolis, MN 55402 Please consider the environment before printing this email. This email may contain information that is confidential or attorney-client privileged and may constitute inside information.The contents of this email are intended only for the i'ecipient(s)listed above.if you are not the intended recipient,you are directed not to read,disclose,distribute or otherwise use this transmission.If you have received this email in error,please notify the sender immediately and delete the transmission. Delivery of this message is not intended to waive any applicable prvileges, 2 Cary Teague From: Paul Nelsor Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 4:13 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: 69th & France (SWC) Good Afternoon Cary, I hope you are well as I know you are keeping quite busy with developments being proposed at a rapid pace across our City. I wanted to connect with you, the Council and Planning Commission regarding the Southwest Corner of 69th & France Avenue in Edina and the proposed development for that location. Mainly the twin tower project that Ryan and their team is proposing. I feel that height and density is good in certain areas of our City and among other locations, this is indeed one of those spots. * Consider the proximity to retail, grocery, recreation and myriad of other services available to a potential homeowner in this location. * There is demand for this type of larger "empty nester" housing - don't force our resident out of town to find an appropriate housing type to fit their needs. * The area is being better aligned with walk-ability and I hope this trend will continue. The City should require the development team to assist with walk/bike amenities throughout the development as well as improvements to adjacent City/County (walk/bike) infrastructure. * These units will be owner-owned and occupied, this is good for the City with additional tax base and having residents who live in and care about our town. * With density, transit becomes a more viable option. Please consider transit opportunities as density increases in the France/Xerxes neighborhoods. * I would encourage the City to look for higher end finishes on the property, unlike the barren and stark parking ramp allowed to be built at the Westin development. * This type of development demands that height become part of the consideration, due to the price of land. * I also encourage the City to not allow what happened to the Centennial Lakes North end development to occur here. That site needed more density and height instead of a 2 story restaurant and mid-box retail site, with yet another awful (looking and functioning) parking ramp. * I realize there are single family homes to the West, but this is across Valley View Road which appears to be a decent buffer to that neighborhood. Thank you for listening and I appreciate the work you do for our City and community. 1 I wanted to connect with you, the Council and Planning Commission regarding the Southwest Corner of 69th & France Avenue in Edina and the proposed development for that location. Mainly the twin tower project that Ryan and their team is proposing. I feel that height and density is good in certain areas of our City and among other locations, this is indeed one of those spots. * Consider the proximity to retail, grocery, recreation and myriad of other services available to a potential homeowner in this location. * There is demand for this type of larger "empty nester" housing - don't force our resident out of town to find an appropriate housing type to fit their needs. * The area is being better aligned with walk-ability and I hope this trend will continue. The City should require the development team to assist with walk/bike amenities throughout the development as well as improvements to adjacent City/County (walk/bike) infrastructure. * These units will be owner-owned and occupied, this is good for the City with additional tax base and having residents who live in and care about our town. * With density, transit becomes a more viable option. Please consider transit opportunities as density increases in the France/Xerxes neighborhoods. * I would encourage the City to look for higher end finishes on the property, unlike the barren and stark parking ramp allowed to be built at the Westin development. * This type of development demands that height become part of the consideration, due to the price of land. * I also encourage the City to not allow what happened to the Centennial Lakes North end development to occur here. That site needed more density and height instead of a 2 story restaurant and mid-box retail site, with yet another awful (looking and functioning) parking ramp. * I realize there are single family homes to the West, but this is across Valley View Road which appears to be a decent buffer to that neighborhood. 2 Thank you for listening and I appreciate the work you do for our City and community. Paul Nelson resident Paul S. Nelson Owners' Representative Constructive Building Advisors, LLC 3 Cary Teague From: Bria Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 10:24 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: support for proposed Estelle Condo project on France Ave in Edina Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 1 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Sincerely, Bria shea 6152 Arctic way Edina 2 Cary Teague From: Reed Christianson Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:56 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina May 1811, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 1 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. As a long-time Edina resident, I was very excited to see this proposed project. I will be selling my house at some point in the near future as one kid is in college and another will be graduating from Edina HS next year. The Estelle is exactly the type of living arrangement my wife and I are looking for. I am loving the resurgence of the Southdale area. Sincerely, Reed Christianson 5652 Woodcrest Drive Edina, MN 55424 This email and any files transmitted with ii are the property of Transwestern and its affiliated companies,are confidential,and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which this email is addressed.It you are not one of the earned recipients or if you have reason to believe you have received this message in error,please notify the sender and delete this message immediately from your computer.Any other use,retention,dissemination,forwarding,printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. 2 Cary Teague From: Peg Roessler Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:26 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: emailing support of Estelle Edina Project Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living— It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. My husband and I currently live in downtown Minneapolis and would very much like to move to condos in Edina —this a project that interests us a great deal. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Breathes New Life — Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 4. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home. 5. Walkability— Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale—alleria corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 6. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 7. The Plaza — Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 8. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Over the last four years, I've worked for Warren Beck at the Westin Edina Galleria Hotel and currently provide public relations services to the Galleria. I would welcome this fantastic edition to Edina. And, my husband and I are very interested in moving from downtown Minneapolis to this project. Sincerely, Peg Roessler, Roessler Public Relations and Loren Sinning 215 10th Ave. S., Unit 501, Minneapolis, MN 55414 R Peg Roessler Roessler Public Relations @PRPRMPLS 2 Cary Teague From: Alissa Ochs Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:20 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Pete Subject: In Support of Estelle Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City,and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: I. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project.Rather than hundreds of rental units,it's time for an attractive,owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina.The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development.It's distinctive and significantly better than the low,squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed,the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone.As parents,this is huge to us! 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming,walkable residential area.This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors.Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail-We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants,coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home. 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes,neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence,visitors and businesses.I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue.Ultimately,I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic,the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle,pedestrian and slow- moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 1 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th.This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape-The proposal appears to add over 200 trees,a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Thank you for your consideration! Best, Alissa Ochs&Pete Chromiak 2 Cary Teague From: MCD Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 5:42 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Mcd Subject: Support for Estelle Edina Cary, please forward this to the city council and planning commission. Thank you, Mike DeMoss Dear Members of the Edina City Council and Planning Commission, This is such a wonderful project. I am very proud of the initial plans and drawings of the Estelle-Edina project. What a fantastic addition to our beautiful city. Please do all you can to make this a reality. I have complete confidence in Luigi Bernardi and his team. Feel free to call me if I can do anything to help. Mike DeMoss Attorney 3209 Galleria Edina, MN 55435 The following describes the essentials of the project that I support: May 17`h, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied i project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69`h. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Respectfully, Michael C. DeMoss, 3209 Galleria, Westin Condo 2 Cary Teague From: Jill Gordon Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 4:51 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina May 17th, 2017 Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, As a resident of Edina and Realtor working in Edina, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools—When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 1 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. Thank you kindly for your consideration,Jill JILL GORDON Lakes Sotheby's International Realty 3217L Galleria, Edina, MN 55435 1 . I 41 r%r a„ 2 Cary Teague From: Marie Sullivan Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 1:26 PM To: Robert Stewart; Mike Fischer; Mary Brindle; Kevin Staunton;James Hovland; Cary Teague Subject: Estelle project Dear City Council Members and City Planners, I apologize for not including this observation in my earlier email, but I believe it's important enough to mention. The picture of the proposed Estelle Towers in the StarTribune's business section (5/17/17) is extremely deceiving. It purposely omits the residential homes nearby, intentionally replacing them with trees! This manipulative rendering shows that the developers have a clear intent to hide the inappropriateness of their project. If the adjoining single family homes were accurately included, most viewers would conclude that these towers are too close to houses and that the EXTREME AMOUNT OF LIGHT emitted from the towers would be way too intrusive to the neighboring houses!!! These are issues that our earlier zoning rules were designed for! To protect established citizens from inconsiderate development! Please protect current residents who don't have the time/energy/money to defend themselves against wealthy, manipulating, deceitful developers! -Marie Sullivan Sent from my iPhone Dear Edina City Council Members, I've attached the above map to remind you that considerable time and effort went • into our community's long range future plans regarding building heights. Edina's 2008 Updated Comprehensive Plan clearly addresses the serious and sensitive issue of needing to protect established residential neighborhoods from the negative affects of higher density/heights of new and re-developments: "Building height is particularly significant in a largely developed community, where any new building has the potential to block views or cast shadows on established neighborhoods and land uses." Land Use Policies/Building Site Design -Buildings should fit within the context of the surrounding neighborhoods. Building, Site Design Principles -Scale and height should be regulated to provide complimentary transitions to adjacent neighborhoods. -Integration of linear, moderately sized medium density multi-unit housing buildings with single family characteristics is recommended in transitional areas to soften the edge of large scale development. Building Height Transitions -Taller buildings (generally 4stories or higher) should step down to provide a height transition to surrounding residential buildings, including buildings across a street or pathway, to avoid excessive shadowing. Keeping in mind how hard Coventry residents fought to maintain an appropriate height limit for the current Pin-Stripes site, and given the Cornelia neighborhood's successful fight to limit height at the current Sunrise Senior Living site, as well as the on-going battle Cornelia neighborhood residents are fighting to limit height and density at the France/72nd site, I believe you should be sending developers a clear message that our city intends to preserve and protect the established Edina residential neighborhoods by adhering to and respecting the lower height and density guidelines that were thoughtfully put forth in the Comprehensive Plan!!! The proposed Estelle development does NOT adhere to the Comprehensive Plan's guidelines because it is way too tall! Luigi Bernardi is trying to gain favor for his towers by presenting himself as a former Cornelia resident. I hope that you will show more respect for our current Cornelia area home owners by vetoing this 20 + story development that laughs in the face of our Comprehensive Plan's clearly stated mission to protect established neighborhoods with transitional height limits!!! Sincerely, Marie Sullivan (Cornelia neighborhood home owner) Sent from my iPad 5 Cary Teague From: Pattye Hechter < Sent: Monday,June 05, 2017 10:08 PM To: James Hovland; Cary Teague; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Estelle Edina proposed Towers Dear City Planner and Council Members I am writing to voice my concern and objections to the proposed project now being considered.I have owned my Edina home with husband for nearly 28 years,and raised three kids through the Edina school system and have been,and continue to be,involved in our community. We purchased our home on the north side of Lake Cornelia(directly across the street from the Aquatic center)not only because of the proximity to the nearby park,pool,etc.,but also for the spectacular view from our backyard. Many of my neighbors have voiced their objections to the size,scale,potential shade cast by these towers,etc.and I echo those concerns.But I wish to add a few more,one of which is traffic considerations. With all the many high density new buildings recently erected near and around Southdale Mall,the roads are no longer adequate to handle the traffic.I presume traffic studies have,or will be completed,but perhaps the two pictures below will give some visual context,rather than a simple counter as to the number of vehicles using 66th street,primarily heading east around Valley View Road. Any given weekday that one would be returning home from work between 4-6 p.m.heading west on 66th street,this is what they would see:(see first two pictures).The first is 66th/Valley View and all three lanes(one turning and two straight)are always filled and the line of traffic often extends the entire length of 66th street beyond where the eye can see--past highway 100. Attempting to simply cross a single lane of traffic to make a left hand turn during this time frame is frustrating if not fraught with the potential to get in an accident. Motorists who are stuck in this line of traffic are often impatient and most simply refuse to pause for the few seconds it will take to cross in front of them,never mind the fact that they simply won't lose their place"in line". If I happen to see what I feel is a small,but safe gap in traffic to drive home into my own driveway, I'm often met with honking horns,and repulsive gestures. Moreover,it's not any safer for a pedestrian to cross with the crosswalk and the new flashing lights. I frequently walk my dog with my neighbor around this time.Drivers do NOT observe the crosswalk light,despite the fact that it couldn't stand out any more than it already does. We typically try to time the pushing of the button when there's a slight gap in traffic so drivers don't have to slam on their brakes.Even so,we always expect one to two cars from each side to drive right through. For those drivers who observe the law and actually stop, numerous times it's either a near or recently an actual accident,as the second driver is not paying attention. I'm not unmindful that neighborhoods evolve,traffic can increase,etc. When we moved here in 1989,this was a four way,stop sign controlled intersection.But adding 160 more units to an already overcrowded area,is untenable at best and disregards the peace and enjoyment that residents of this Cornelia area of Edina have been able to enjoy. At some point as a"semi"empty nester,we will downsize our home. It's a large house on a large lot,likely attracting households with young children to utilize the pool,playground,and be close to Cornelia elementary school. We had concerns buying our house right on 66th street in terms of raising a family. But my fear now is that the traffic is so out of hand,that it would scare off would-be buyers and we wouldn't be able to sell our property for what it is worth largely due to continuous high density building. The Estelle project would add perhaps 300 more individuals to this neighborhood. This doesn't make sense.This project doesn't belong in a neighborhood setting. 1 i Kr m .. ac...z. The other concern I'd like to address is the view,and I've included a few pictures in an attempt to illustrate what impact this project would have on the sight line from ours and our neighbors'backyards. Admittedly,I've put something together that doesn't compete with the flashy presentation the developers have presented to the planning commission last month,that seemed to have many planning commissioner members enamored with the project. Yes,there's a lot to like about tax revenue to the city,school district etc. However,it just doesn't fit where it is being proposed. The first two pictures are from my backyard.You can see the 210'water tower in the distance. I've tried to roughly put in where the proposed new buildings would be,and I've drawn a line to show the water towers in the 2nd and 3rd pictures.This tranquil lake view that so many have enjoyed for years would be completely ruined by this project. It doesn't belong. It is out of scale. And there's a reason why there's height limitations in the area;so as not to disrupt the view which this project would in a grotesque manner. The 3rd picture is taken further west on 66th street,but I've included it as the Westin is in view.Given it's distance,and much smaller size than the proposed buildings,it is no where as prominent as these proposed new towers would be.I couldn't help but notice that with all the arguably impressive computer renderings of the project presented to the planning commission,the particular picture I've used that was 2 featured in the newspapers shows zero houses or any of the adjacent neighborhood just to the west.A true rendering of what is being proposed with an honest picture of what this would look like in this neighborhood, is appropriate. While I can't match the imagery that has been provided by the developers,at least my pictures are honest.This is a neighborhood.The proposed plan would irretrievably alter,and not in a good way,the way we view our neighborhood,as well as the traffic as previously described. I urge you to deny the proposal to protect the integrity and fabric of the Cornelia community. Respectfully Pattye Hechter 4301 West 66th St 1r,A. ,40 p� `'. r r r fit. e rfi? ., +IR; } ro iao Ill 4.1 >. Ifo Ia , 411 P.S.--Kindly forward this email to the planning commission as well 3 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:27 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Bremer & BMO Development Hi Jackie, Did you want to forward this to the Planning Commission members and anyone else you think needs this, Cary? Lynette Biunnn RnranfinniSt From: Matt Rausch Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 8:30 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Bremer & BMO Development Good morning! Please pass this along to the Planning Commission and anyone else involved in the in the Bremer and BMO Redevelopment. I wanted to write todayt in reaction to the proposed plan for the towers off of France. I live in the Cornelia neighborhood adjacent to the site proposed for the new 20+story towers on the 70th and France site. I am not a long-time resident like many in attendance at the last open meeting,quite the contrary actually. My wife and I moved here just last year to sink our roots into this great community(one toddler,one on the way!) I attended the meeting a few weeks ago,and will be there tonight as well. I appreciate living in a community where I am welcomed to be involved! My first point is voicing a concern about the height,like many. A large emphasis was put on the shadows these towers would cast over our neighborhood. I do indeed agree with this,but also personally care more about the neighborhood skyline of residential rooftops and trees being compromised by large,towering structures. I do believe that the policy implementing a 4-story limit on new developments was discussed and litigated for a reason,and the proposed regulation change of 4 stories to 24 stories seems like an extreme compromise. I also believe that this block was designated as a"Transition Zone"for good reason: to prevent developments such as this from disturbing the adjacent neighborhoods both visually and physically. At the last meeting I heard other such compromises from the prospective developers, such as how far(in feet)from roads like France Avenue you can build. It was an alarming change proposed to existing city ordinance. As far as the traffic that the last meeting addressed,I didn't see plans to take into consideration traffic demands from the retail space, including a possible restaurant. Places like"Tavern on France"bring a lot of hungry patrons,which is great,but in the sketch plans I only saw enough outdoor parking for probably just employees of these new businesses. Parking concerns were only addressed that involved the residents of the proposed towers. Adding to other feedback from nearby Edina residents,please keep in mind that many of the citizens living in our neighborhoods off 70th and Valley View are not in a homeowners association and were not more readily informed of these plans. Unfortunately,I believe many of my neighbors are still unaware of the impending project. Some of our neighbors have been admirably trying their best to notify people the old fashioned way: door-to-door. We do feel a bit behind on these efforts due to the timing of when we were more fairly addressed. I do agree that change is hard and often unwelcome at the beginning,and some of the Planning Commission voiced this point last month. However,I would encourage the board to consider following in the footsteps of developments more pleasing-to-the-eye, environmentally conscious,and also in line with Affordable Housing. As far as offering my simple and unprovable opinion,I do believe tall towers are becoming a outdated way for newer developments,with lower,green-concious"campuses" and experiences being favored, especially sites this close to residential neighborhoods. My mind goes to the towering apartments(unfairly perhaps)that dominate the skyline of the Riverside and Cedar neighborhood,south of downtown Minneapolis. At one point,these towers were considered"new age." Overall, I do indeed favor change and a revitalization of France Avenue,just not a change that would compromise this many Edina ordinances previously voted upon,and our neighborhoods that would be so close to this site. I applaud the impressive plan from the 1 developer,and may even see it working in a different area,but strongly believe it's the wrong site for these towers. A code-friendly plan for an already-identified transition zone is more appropriate here. Thank you for your time,and your consideration of the above feedback. I am happy to have moved to a community that supports open communication with its citizens,and I'm proud to be getting involved in the place I have chosen to raise my family! Sincerely, t:orncli<t '[°s.ighboch od 69)18 i-iillc est L,a€t: 2 Cary Teague From: Matt Rausch < Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 8:23 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Bremer & BMO Development - 70th and France - Please Share with the Planning Commission Cary, Good evening! Please pass this along to the Planning Commission and anyone else involved in the in the Bremer and BMO Redevelopment. I wanted to write tonight in reaction to the proposed plan for the towers off of France. I live in the Cornelia neighborhood adjacent to the site proposed for the new 20+ story towers on the 70th and France site. I am not a long-time resident like many in attendance at the last open meeting, quite the contrary actually. My wife and I moved here just last year to sink our roots into this great community (one toddler, one on the way!) I attended the meeting a few weeks ago, and will be there tomorrow on the 6th as well. I appreciate living in a community where I am welcomed to be involved! My first point is voicing a concern about the height, like many. A large emphasis was put on the shadows these towers would cast over our neighborhood. I do indeed agree with this, but also personally care more about the neighborhood skyline of residential rooftops and trees being compromised by large, towering structures. I do believe that the policy implementing a 4-story limit on new developments was discussed and litigated for a reason, and the proposed regulation change of 4 stories to 24 stories seems like an extreme compromise. I also believe that this block was designated as a "Transition Zone" for good reason: to prevent developments such as this from disturbing the adjacent neighborhoods both visually and physically. At the last meeting I heard other such compromises from the prospective developers, such as how far(in feet) from roads like France Avenue you can build. It was an alarming change proposed to existing city ordinance. As far as the traffic that the last meeting addressed, I didn't see plans to take into consideration traffic demands from the retail space, including a possible restaurant. Places like "Tavern on France" bring a lot of hungry patrons, which is great, but in the sketch plans I only saw enough outdoor parking for probably just employees of these new businesses. Parking concerns were only addressed that involved the residents of the proposed towers. Adding to other feedback from nearby Edina residents, please keep in mind that many of the citizens living in our neighborhoods off 70th and Valley View are not in a homeowners association and were not more readily informed of these plans. Unfortunately, I believe many of my neighbors are still unaware of the impending project. Some of our neighbors have been admirably trying their best to notify people the old fashioned way: door-to-door. We do feel a bit behind on these efforts due to the timing of when we were more fairly addressed. I do agree that change is hard and often unwelcome at the beginning, and some of the Planning Commission voiced this point last month. However, I would encourage the board to consider following in the footsteps of developments more pleasing-to-the-eye, environmentally conscious, and also in line with Affordable Housing. As far as offering my simple and unprovable opinion, I do believe tall towers are becoming a outdated way for newer developments, with lower, green-concious "campuses" and experiences being favored, especially sites this close to residential neighborhoods. My mind goes to the towering apartments (unfairly 1 perhaps)that dominate the skyline of the Riverside and Cedar neighborhood, south of downtown Minneapolis. At one point, these towers were considered "new age." Overall, I do indeed favor change and a revitalization of France Avenue,just not a change that would compromise this many Edina ordinances previously voted upon, and our neighborhoods that would be so close to this site. I applaud the impressive plan from the developer, and may even see it working in a different area, but strongly believe it's the wrong site for these towers. A code-friendly plan for an already-identified transition zone is more appropriate here. Thank you for your time, and your consideration of the above feedback. I am happy to have moved to a community that supports open communication with its citizens, and I'm proud to be getting involved in the place I have chosen to raise my family! Sincerely, Matt Rausch Cornelia Neighborhood 6928 Hillcrest Lane Edina, MN 55435 2 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Mike Kenfield Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2017 2:11 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Case File 2017.010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment I received in the mail today a notification letter regarding Case File 2017.010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. You have asked for feedback, and I will come directly to the point: Any city official who thinks there is ANY merit to this proposal has lost all sense of their responsibility to represent the citizens of this city. To even CONSIDER a variance of the magnitude is almost beyond belief. Come on, the variance that is being requested is of"Can you really believe this?! Really!! What are they thinking9'9'7" proportions. I was part of the planning process that developed the comprehensive plan, and believed--no, assumed--it would be used to guide the development of the corridor between France and York/Xerxes Avenues and the surrounding neighborhoods. It was a compromise (as these things always are) based on guiding principles that included the preservation of the bordering neighborhoods. Four stories west of France, higher(but not this high) east of France. Not ideal, but acceptable. This comprehensive plan has guided the development of several other properties west of France, and I believe the results have been good. In contrast to past projects, what is being proposed here is so out of line with the plan that I can not understand why it is being given any serious attention at all. It should have been rejected out of hand at the original presentation of the proposal. I have many objections beyond what I have already said, but there should be no need to enumerate them here, for they pale in comparison to this fundamental disregard for the comprehensive plan. I have read interviews with the developer. His ego and hubris are as oversized as his proposal. He apparently made an investment in property based on assumptions that this would be a "slam dunk." Those assumptions are greatly out of line with the realities of the situation. And I do not take lightly his apparent disregard for the city and its residents (even if he claims to be one of us) that he knows what is best for us. And if he should argue that the scale of this project is necessary to justify his investment, all I can say is TOO BAD! No member of the Edina government should give any weight to this hollow argument, or any other part of this proposal. This has gotten personal. I don't want several floors of two office towers filled with people who have daily direct views to my neighborhood and back yard, nor buildings whose shadows would turn our neighborhoods into a giant sundial. Because it is personal for me I want to make sure it is personal for all of you--mayor, city manager, council members, and others. I will gladly talk with you about this further. Come visit our neighborhood, come to my house. Put yourself in our situation. It's a cliche, but nevertheless true: Would you want this in YOUR backyard? And know that if you somehow do find merit in this variance request you will be expected to explain it to me, our neighborhood, and the greater Edina community. Your ability to represent the residents of Edina is being watched--and questioned--by many. It is your responsibility to do the right thing, to honor the commitments 1 made to the community through the city planning process. It is also an opportunity for the members of our city government to demonstrate common sense and the ability to simply say "no." Mike Kenfield 6913 Hillcrest Lane Edina, MN 5435 952-928-0517 Mike Kenfield 2 Cary Teague From: Schreibers Sent: Monday,June 05, 2017 1:46 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Cary, Please pass on my concerns to the Planning Commission members Gerard Strauss, Todd Thorsen, Steven Hobbs, Susan Lee, James Bennett, Sheila Berube and John Hamilton. Thank you. I am opposed to the Bernardi/Ryan project proposed at the Sketch Plan Review to the Planning Commission on May 24th, where I was in attendance. The developer touted a tapered upper profile. King Kong's head was certainly smaller than his massive body, but the "two towers" of his legs and massiveness of his body and SHEER HEIGHT alone, towering above his surroundings has frightened movie goers since 1933! THIS project frightens me! I live at 6713 Cornelia Drive. I grew up in the home and my husband and I chose to come back to this neighborhood after living in New Ulm for 35 years and have invested in a remodel. We took precaution to keep the street view unchanged, so it would remain in tune with the surrounding neighborhood. The attraction to this area is its convenience to many amenities, yet an open sky and plenty of light. We have no desire to winter elsewhere, or head to a cabin for the summer. We have no need to 'get out of the city' as we are not in the shadows of tall buildings and knew that the city's comprehensive plan states that none are to be built over 4 stories. We have a beautiful park at the end of the street and even our backyard is its own getaway with no obstructions looming over us. We enjoy our visits downtown Minneapolis but are so grateful to have this neighborhood to come home to. However, since making the decision for our return, the comp plan was recently altered to allow the first of the Windemere projects to be eight stories, doubling that of the comp plan, and now Edina Estelle would be 24 stories, SIX times that of the comp plan. We may be a few blocks from the Edina Estelle but it will rise above the tree line and be in our view everyday. It will cast a shadow on the streets we frequent on foot, daily, as we are walkers, and as we drive en route to nearby businesses, also daily. Curious as to what other suburbs in the metropolitan area have buildings of this height, I went to Google. I found the entry below, followed by a listing of 136 buildings. Of those, I was interested in any that were 18 stories or higher and not in Minneapolis or St. Paul, 18 being the height of the Westin. Only 7 %, and that includes the Westin, were found and they were in Rochester, Bloomington, St. Louis Park, and Edina. Just two reached 24 stories, both in 1 Bloomington. Those are the The Wells Fargo Plaza, off Xerxes, next to 494 and the 8500 Tower at 494 and 100. The DoubleTree (formerly Radisson South), 21 stories, is again, by 494 and 100. St. Louis Park's Metropoint Towers, 20 stories, is at 169 and 394, and finally, Edinborough, at 18 stories, is again, close to 494 and Xerxes. None are imposing on neighborhoods as the proposed Estelle would be. This building does not belong here. List of tallest buildings in Minnesota From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search This list of tallest buildings in Minnesota ranks skyscrapers in the state of Minnesota by tallest height of high rise. This does not include antennas. The majority of the tallest buildings in Minnesota are in Minneapolis, the largest city in the state. Other cities that have some of the state's tallest buildings include the state capital of St. Paul (14), South St. Paul (1), Rochester (10), Golden Valley (4), St. Louis Park(7), Plymouth (1), Duluth (6), Brooklyn Center (1), St. Cloud (2), Edina(9), Maplewood (1), Robbinsdale (1), Eden Prairie (1), Moorhead (2), Richfield (4), and Bloomington(15). Not all buildings in Minneapolis and St. Paul are listed, due to the large number of skyscrapers and high rises in both cities. Please give strong consideration to the people of the Cornelia and Cornelia South neighborhood who will be directly affected by these 24 and 20 story buildings in loss of sunlight, shadows, visual, light and air pollution. Thank you, Tricia Schreiber 2 Cary Teague From: Belinda Erlin Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 4:49 PM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Mr. Hovland, Mr. Teague, Planning Commission and City Council Members, I live at 6920 Southdale Road in Edina with my husband and my two young children aged 7 & 9. I am writing to express my concern about the proposed 20 & 24 story high development known as Estelle Edina. My house and my neighborhood will be directly impacted by this development if built as proposed. Hopefully, some PROS: Possibility for attractive retail outlets - coffee shops, bakery, restaurant etc. Hopefully, improved walkability along Valley View and improved, safer pedestrian crossings. Valley View has become a real race track. Overall improvement to the area with a thoughtfully built development Concerns: Comprehensive traffic flow: Extra traffic flow not only from these two condo towers and the row of townhouses, but also the new retail outlets as well as the other new apartment and commercial spaces that have been built recently. These include the Aurora building, apartments on the SE side of the Southdale parking lot, the Westin, apartments behind the new Byerlys and the newly proposed free-standing Restoration Hardware. The combined traffic effect on this area is important to evaluate. I would like to know that there are comprehensive traffic studies being conducted and that traffic will not be short-cutting off Valley View or 70th to redirect along Southdale Road. Children live here. Vehicles already drive too quickly around Southdale Road and there is no enforcement of speed limit, no signage and no encouragement or monitoring to slow down Light pollution: Already at night when I stand in my front yard I can see the lights coming of France Ave, Southdale Mall parking lot, the Westin, especially in winter. How much extra light will there be throughout the darkness of night if we have two huge towers hovering right over our back yards? Not only the lights from these buildings, but also the parking lots and improved side walks. Noise pollution: Will there be curfews set on when heavy commercial trucks can operate in the area of the retail and condo living? Delivery trucks, garbage trucks and before that, construction trucks, beeping reverse sounds, etc.? Property Values: There should be a property value impact study done. Will our houses lose any of their value as a result of being right on the edge of 2 high rise buildings? We have just personally invested a large sum of money in a renovation of our house with the hope of staying right here until our kids graduate from high school (currently at Highlands Elementary). We have invested in our community and our home. There are other neighbors investing, tearing down and building new. How will a 24 & 20 story development right next door impact our home values? 1 I believe there is an opportunity here for a positive impact on our community as long as the matters I've outlined above are analyzed and carefully considered. I do not feel the HEIGHT of the towers is acceptable in such close proximity to our homes. Thank you for your consideration of the above matters, Sincerely, Belinda Erlin 6920 Southdale Road Edina, MN 55435 2 June 1, 2017 Cary Teague 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Mr.Teague: I have just watched the recorded meeting of the Edina Planning Commission of May 24, 2017,featuring the presentation of the VA Sketch Plan Review for 69'and France. I am an Edina resident who lives with my family on Dunberry Lane. This proposed development would be at the end of our street to the East. While we are not in the direct shadow, literally, of the proposed towers,this is a development that would still impact our entire neighborhood considerably in terms of the character of this residential area, its tradition,and the reason we and others chose to invest and live in homes here. This tower proposal is absurd in its intrusive, looming height. It is disrespectful and dismissive to the Edina residents who have created this community with their commitment to their single family homes,who moved here to raise families and form bonds with neighbors. Commissioner John Hamilton, who claims this is a "hansom attribute", should invite the project into this own neighborhood, and enjoy its hansom impact on his own home. Commissioner Jimmy Bennet who finds the proposal so "exciting" should imagine how exciting it would be if this proposal were casting its shadow on his backyard where his young children play. I wonder how long it would take Commissioner Berube to get used to these towers if they were out her back window? She suggests"maybe we'll all get used to it". Of course Commissioner Berube will get used to it. She does not live here. I am sure I too could get used to a massive development on her block, assuming I had no concern for my fellow Edina community members and their investment in their homes and neighborhoods. I want to thank Commissioner Lee for her consideration of the residents whose neighborhood will be ruined by this proposal. Her courage in doing so was enormously appreciated. The fact that the presentation did not include one image of what the looming towers would look like from the homes in its immediate vicinity demonstrates the lack of regard these developers have for our community and its residents. Of course it was not an oversight. It was a purposeful avoidance of an ugly truth. I wonder how hansom such images would be? How exciting? Residents bought into this neighborhood with a promise from the city, a promise in the form of zoning, a promise that this area would not host buildings over four stories. To jettison that promise for these ridiculous looming towers would be to betray the residents who came here under that promise and have made this a stable, residential community. Of course a development such as this will result in a rapid erosion of that neighborhood stability. Homes will transition from owner occupied to rentals, owners of those rental properties will no longer support referendums to increase school funding, and renters will have less reason to abide by the decorum that makes this area appealing. The neighborhood will be lost as we know it. The neighborhood we all bought into,one that assured us of a 4 story building limit,would have been a ruse. We, as Edina citizens,are prepared to resist this proposal. Fortunately,we have the freedom of expression to inform the public about this developer, its disregard for this community, and its flouting of a standing zoning standard, a promise from this city, of 4 stories. That freedom of expression will take multiple forms, some very visible. This will not be a letter writing campaign alone. What will be the responsibility of the Edina Planning Commission to represent and protect the residents of this city?This neighborhood? When can the residents of any community of Edina be able to place faith in its government to protect their investment in their homes and their communities? Or is such faith to reserved only for developers? The decision facing this proposed development will answer that question. Regards, • Dr. Daniel Holland 4817 Dunberry Lane Edina, MN 55435 952-956-2491 September 10, 2017 Mr. Cary Teague, Director Community Development City of Edina 4801 west 50th Street Edina, MN 55439 And Members, City of Edina Planning Commission Director Teague, Ladies and Gentlemen I am writing as a long time Edina resident to express my support for your favorable consideration of the proposed Estelle Edina Condominium project to be located at France Ave. South and West 69th Street. I believe that a plan as unique and of such high quality design and intelligent land use deserves recognition for what it offers as a major step forward. Edina's Greater Southdale area is experiencing an active period of redevelopment and transition of Edina's most highly valued properties. Over the past five to seven years, several new and redeveloped projects of multi-family residential, retail, hospitality, and other commercial uses have replaced buildings that responded to the original Southdale Center, built in the mid-1950's as the first enclosed mall retail center in the country. It's bold and forward thinking developers not only created the centerpiece itself, but fostered a variety of projects that complemented and shared the success of Southdale Center. It truly identified Edina in the '50's and '60's as a forward thinking, high quality, progressive community with excellent schools, high quality neighborhoods, centrally located library and county service center, and an excellent regional hospital which gave life to active medical services located in its surrounding area.A great variety of businesses, both new and existing, sought to locate in the areas near Southdale extending their reach west to Highway 100 and south to Interstate 494. All of which served to create the laudable financial balance between Edina's residential areas and its strong and diversified commercial base. We are now offered an opportunity by a team of developers who's prior generations have contributed to the preceding 50-60 years of growth and development in Edina. The unique design of the Estelle project,with its 10,000 square foot footprint that facilitates 4 units per floor, each a corner unit,will be a very desirable marketing feature of the property. But rather than offer a rectangular mid-rise block structure, the exterior will offer a tall, more slender and graceful presence on a corner, offering light and views between the towers. The smaller floor plate also creates opportunity for more green space and landscaping rather than a shorter building requiring much more ground coverage and restricted ground level views. The possibility of a skyway-type connection to the Galleria Center across France Avenue addresses the often expressed desire for more "walkability" and "connectivity" in an area such as Southdale. The development team has created possibilities for those qualities as well as having been responsive to the City Council's initiative to foster diversity in the housing options in Edina by committing to offer 20 units of workforce housing within the structures of the Estelle project. Edina's bold and forward looking leadership has traditionally seized the opportunity to create and foster innovation in property uses and design quality, and those who have followed through the years have generally tried to encourage similar results. However, in the past decade, many critics of what has been built in the Southdale area have cited some of the multi-family projects as lacking the quality that has been characteristic of Edina's previous high standards. Specifically that most of the projects look the same with little distinctive about their appearance or design uniqueness. While judgment and opinions of appearance and quality are individual, Edina has always valued excellence in every aspect of the community's life and activities. To strive for continuing improvement in many areas of Edina's life is a continuing tradition, There is no reason not to encourage proposed projects that reflect bold and ecellent design rather than reduce them to something acceptable, but less than outstanding, or even worse, lose them altogether when they challenge us to embrace high quality in "something new". Thank you for the opportunity to offer these comments.. Sincerely, James Nelson 7790 Lochmere Terrace Edina, MN 55439 Cary Teague From: Carl Runck Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2017 8:13 AM To: Scott H. Neal; Bill Neuendorf; Cary Teague Subject: FW: Estelle Edina - Former Mayor Maetzold FYI Original message From: Denny Maetzold Date: 8/14/17 6:58 PM (GMT-06:00) To: James Hovland Subject: Estelle Edina - Former Mayor Maetzold Mayor and Council Members-- I am writing to express my support for the proposed Estelle Edina project. Here are my thoughts: • As a_geography major at the U in the early sixties specializing in the study of American Cities, I became a fan of "verticality" in key commercial areas to capitalize on best use of valuable land in terms of associated amenities including public services, transportation (especially public transportation) retail and medical services, employment opportunities and public infrastructure. Bottom line, Estelle Edina as a vertical residential project seems me to be an excellent use of our very valuable land; • As a retired banker who worked at 69th and France for 10 years (and prior to that at 65th and France), I am highly familiar with the area's history, its commercial development and uses, its traffic flows and, importantly, its "positioning" relative to Edina and the general Southwest metro area. Given this, I feel that the Estelle project is exactly the type of development that is appropriate and needed to enhance the Southdale area and our greater community's sustained growth and dynamic viability into the 21st century. The Metro area no longer has the luxury of horizontal geographic growth - growth must come in commercial areas such as our Southdale district, and I would expect that additional projects such as Estelle will be proposed and built in the future - possibly very soon; • During my years on the Council I frequently heard residents comment that they would like to have an option for owner-occupied low-maintenance housing when they became "empty nesters" In general, options have been limited; consequently, many residents who had been passionate about Edina have found it necessary to leave. The Estelle project will help alleviate this significant need for owned housing; • As a Council member, I always had interest in affordable housing availability and as the Council entertained proposals for new residential development, I encouraged the incorporation of affordable units into developments, if possible. I therefore was very pleased to learn that the Estelle project includes affordable housing solutions; and • The Estelle project would be an excellent enhancement to our tax base - I understand it will not require public money or subsidy. Finally, I understand the critical responsibility you have for protecting Edina's neighborhoods and there is concern the Estelle project is "too tall." We have always wanted to provide a suitable buffer between commercial and single-family homes and I believe in the case of Estelle through its amenities the project does provide the intended buffer, especially when tempered by the the need to help ensure a dynamic future for the the Southdale commercial district. While the Estelle project is just one project for consideration, it signals an important new direction for our Edina community. 1 Bottom line, /feel Estelle Edina is a compelling project that needs to move forward. Thank you for your consideration! Dennis Maetzold Former Mayor 2 Cary Teague From: Casey Hankinson < Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2017 9:32 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Dear Carey, Members of the Edina City Council and Planning Commission, First and foremost, thank you for all of your time and dedication you have given to make our City great. I know all of you take time away from your families, your business and your interests to sacrifice for the betterment of our Community. Thank you. I am sending this email in support of the Estelle project. I am in strong favor of this project for the following reasons: 1) Quality. Redevelopment is hard and many times quality is sacrificed to make a project work. What I love about this project is the high design and quality of what is going to be built. This is a project that Edina will be proud of for generations to come. 2) Owner occupied living. Having just had to go through the process of trying to find a new home with my parents, Estelle will provide a great opportunity for many great Edina(and other) residents to stay in Edina. My parents lived in Edina for 40 years. It was important for them to stay in Edina. I was very disappointed to find that there were not as many options for residences to own that were for the ages of 60+. Plenty to rent but very few to own. They could have easily gone to Minneapolis, Minnetonka, etc as there are many more options but they wanted to stay in Edina. This is not an apartment project, but an owner-occupied opportunity that is very rare in Edina. 3) Taxes. I don't think it can be overlooked that $1,200,000 plus per year will come back to the Edina Schools in taxes from this project. That is substantial and will continue to make our school system world class. 4) Innovation. Why has Edina grown over the years while other communities nearby have shrunk? Innovation and courage. My guess is the Point of France was a contentious project back when it was built. Perhaps the Westin, Southdale, etc. These are the types of projects that bring new life, walk-ability, greenspace and success. If you want quality, you have to have height in an urban City. The Estelle project will give Edina one of the highest quality projects this City has ever seen. Please continue to have the courage to make it happen. 1 Thank you for commitment to Edina. Casey Hankinson 6615 Parkwood Lane Edina, MN 2 Cary Teague From: K R Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:44 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies Dear Edina City Council and Planning Commission, I am sending this letter to express my support for the Estelle Edina Residential proposal from Arcadia and Ryan Companies. I believe this project makes a positive contribution to the community and City, and I endorse the proposal for the following specific reasons: 1. Owner-occupied living—It's been over a decade since the city has added a condominium project. Rather than hundreds of rental units, it's time for an attractive, owner-occupied project like Estelle Edina. The project gives Edina empty-nesters a way to stay in the city with the added benefit of having their homes open to new families looking to move to Edina. 2. Quality—Twenty-four stories is bold yet this beautiful design is worthy of Edina and sets the tone and standard for the rest of the district's development. It's distinctive and significantly better than the low, squat buildings currently popping up in Edina and throughout the entire Twin Cities. We love it! 3. Taxes for Schools —When completed, the estimated tax base from Estelle Edina will add over a million dollars annually to Edina schools alone. 4. Breathes New Life—Estelle Edina thankfully eliminates the surface parking lots and dated buildings on the corner of France and 69th Street and transforms the corner into a welcoming, walkable residential area. This is an important intersection in the city and currently underutilized for all residents and neighbors. Estelle Edina recognizes this opportunity and has planned the corner in a thoughtful way that elevates the entire corridor ensuring it stays relevant for years to come. 5. Neighborhood retail - We are excited to see the energy and opportunities Estelle Edina brings in this corner. We're looking forward to learning what new restaurants, coffee shops and neighborhood retail will call this project home 6. Walkability—Estelle's exterior includes sidewalks lined with ample treescapes, neighborhood retail and outdoor seating—all of which add to the quality of life for residence, visitors and businesses. I believe this project will encourage a sidewalk experience throughout the entire Southdale corridor that is overdue. Ultimately, I'd like France Avenue to become a safe place to walk with my family and friends. 7. The Woonerf—Oriented towards people and residents rather than traffic, the Woonerf extends the area's bicycle, pedestrian and slow-moving automobile experience that has already been proposed by the Avenue on France project immediately to the North. 1 8. The Plaza—Estelle's planned Plaza brings what has been so successful at Centennial Lakes and the Promenade to the corner of France and 69th. This brings a neighborhood gathering spot to an area that is currently an underused space for the amount of neighbors in the area. 9. Greenscape - The proposal appears to add over 200 trees, a pocket park and generally improve a site that is primarily asphalt and impossible to traverse on foot. 2 Cary Teague From: Pattye Hechter Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 10:08 PM To: James Hovland; Cary Teague; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Estelle Edina proposed Towers Dear City Planner and Council Members I am writing to voice my concern and objections to the proposed project now being considered.I have owned my Edina home with husband for nearly 28 years,and raised three kids through the Edina school system and have been,and continue to be,involved in our community. We purchased our home on the north side of Lake Cornelia(directly across the street from the Aquatic center)not only because of the proximity to the nearby park,pool,etc.,but also for the spectacular view from our backyard. Many of my neighbors have voiced their objections to the size,scale,potential shade cast by these towers,etc.and I echo those concerns.But I wish to add a few more,one of which is traffic considerations. With all the many high density new buildings recently erected near and around Southdale Mall,the roads are no longer adequate to handle the traffic.I presume traffic studies have,or will be completed,but perhaps the two pictures below will give some visual context,rather than a simple counter as to the number of vehicles using 66th street,primarily heading east around Valley View Road. Any given weekday that one would be returning home from work between 4-6 p.m.heading west on 66th street,this is what they would see:(see first two pictures).The first is 66th/Valley View and all three lanes(one turning and two straight)are always filled and the line of traffic often extends the entire length of 66th street beyond where the eye can see--past highway 100. Attempting to simply cross a single lane of traffic to make a left hand turn during this time frame is frustrating if not fraught with the potential to get in an accident. Motorists who are stuck in this line of traffic are often impatient and most simply refuse to pause for the few seconds it will take to cross in front of them,never mind the fact that they simply won't lose their place"in line". If I happen to see what I feel is a small,but safe gap in traffic to drive home into my own driveway, I'm often met with honking horns,and repulsive gestures. Moreover, it's not any safer for a pedestrian to cross with the crosswalk and the new flashing lights. I frequently walk my dog with my neighbor around this time.Drivers do NOT observe the crosswalk light,despite the fact that it couldn't stand out any more than it already does. We typically try to time the pushing of the button when there's a slight gap in traffic so drivers don't have to slam on their brakes.Even so,we always expect one to two cars from each side to drive right through. For those drivers who observe the law and actually stop, numerous times it's either a near or recently an actual accident,as the second driver is not paying attention. I'm not unmindful that neighborhoods evolve,traffic can increase,etc. When we moved here in 1989,this was a four way,stop sign controlled intersection. But adding 160 more units to an already overcrowded area,is untenable at best and disregards the peace and enjoyment that residents of this Cornelia area of Edina have been able to enjoy. At some point as a"semi"empty nester,we will downsize our home. It's a large house on a large lot, likely attracting households with young children to utilize the pool,playground,and be close to Cornelia elementary school. We had concerns buying our house right on 66th street in terms of raising a family. But my fear now is that the traffic is so out of hand,that it would scare off would-be buyers and we wouldn't be able to sell our property for what it is worth largely due to continuous high density building. The Estelle project would add perhaps 300 more individuals to this neighborhood. This doesn't make sense.This project doesn't belong in a neighborhood setting. 1 E 000 sr a tv. ms`s 41:z � WroP k , 1 � m < _dt�^9 b'-0T7 ll x: 11 - gyp' a • The other concern I'd like to address is the view,and I've included a few pictures in an attempt to illustrate what impact this project would have on the sight line from ours and our neighbors'backyards. Admittedly,I've put something together that doesn't compete with the flashy presentation the developers have presented to the planning commission last month,that seemed to have many planning commissioner members enamored with the project. Yes,there's a lot to like about tax revenue to the city,school district etc. However,it just doesn't fit where it is being proposed. The first two pictures are from my backyard. You can see the 210'water tower in the distance. I've tried to roughly put in where the proposed new buildings would be,and I've drawn a line to show the water towers in the 2nd and 3rd pictures.This tranquil lake view that so many have enjoyed for years would be completely ruined by this project. It doesn't belong. It is out of scale. And there's a reason why there's height limitations in the area;so as not to disrupt the view which this project would in a grotesque manner. The 3rd picture is taken further west on 66th street,but I've included it as the Westin is in view.Given it's distance,and much smaller size than the proposed buildings,it is no where as prominent as these proposed new towers would be. I couldn't help but notice that with all the arguably impressive computer renderings of the project presented to the planning commission,the particular picture I've used that was 2 featured in the newspapers shows zero houses or any of the adjacent neighborhood just to the west.A true rendering of what is being proposed with an honest picture of what this would look like in this neighborhood,is appropriate. While I can't match the imagerythat has been provided by the developers,at least my pictures are honest.This is a neighborhood.The proposed plan would irretrievably alter,and not in a good way,the way we view our neighborhood,as well as the traffic as previously described. I urge you to deny the proposal to protect the integrity and fabric of the Cornelia community. Respectfully Pattye Hechter 4301 West 66th St /:MO.,''"e)'X21 d 5 ri ?� r g �.._ Er fir 7a �`�lg.. ' �r n; 7 r is y s. t� 9) kt � (i'g yd,x�yhy "rw, fi:` _b .,,�-�: ' ' ' *"rill./ '',..' * ' ' . .- It1: -::,;-;.,'._,‘_--,,,,-,,"-:„,,,,-----.v,'..,..S;;.z.',-:,..-r'.%,4,..,....4•'.i,',,....',. a '' n;„,r,_,2.,^,.,4',;',',.,--:,.-,_g_,-r,,',.11•,..-."','1"-.0,-.;.'44. `- _'�� . 1 ,, �r � 7 t /�''''� fin e ' .. . t ;' r wn 14. C' iii }, 'tY {g '- "".•k {x„'75.7i P.S.--Kindly forward this email to the planning commission as well 3 Cary Teague From: Cesley and David Bergsten Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:10 PM To: Cary Teague;James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Building Height Proposed for 6900 France Ave development Hello, I am a resident of the South Cornelia neighborhood at 4705 Hibiscus. It is my hope that this email would be reviewed prior tonight's city council meeting. I am writing to express my disappointment in the proposed building height for the "twin towers" slated for the 6900 France Avenue development. This would directly impact neighbors negatively, look starkly different from neighboring homes and minimize neighborhood sun exposure, and certainly ignores the concept of a transitional zone. I am not opposed to condo or multifamily development in the Southdale area, however building height and style are critical to the area remaining tasteful and sustainable; it would make sense for the residents of the surrounding neighborhood to limit the height of such developments in Edina to 4-6 stories maximum. Two buildings as tall as proposed will look oddly placed on the edge of a neighborhood, aesthetically unappealing, and truly affect neighbors' ability to enjoy their backyards, homes, and streets (for parking and for walks or bike rides). It also sets a precedent for future buildings along that corridor that would continue to impact the enjoyment of all of the South Cornelia neighborhood and worsen strain on our schools. Already, many new developments have taken place within the last few years on France ave that directly impact our neighborhood in terms of traffic in the surrounding area, accessibility, and creation of an urban feel to a suburban family neighborhood. In reference to the intention of the Comp Plan, I strongly encourage honoring a plan that limits building height in our neighborhood. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions or concerns. David and Cesley Bergsten 612 281 6749 1