HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-09-12 Park Board Packet•
EDINA PARK BOARD
Tuesday, September 12, 1995
7:30 p.m.
Manager's Conference Room
A G E N D A
City of Edina
* 1. Approval of August 8, 1995, Park Board meeting minutes.
2. Community Gardens Site.
* 3. Park Improvement Plan.
4. Other.
* 5. Adjournment.
* These are agenda items that require or request Park Board
action.
City Hall (612) 927-8861
4801 WEST 501-H STREET FAX (612) 927-7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 5 54 24-1 394 TDD (612) 927-5461
CITY OF EDINA
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 8, 1995
TO: All Park Board Members
_ ;v
FROM: John Keprios, Directory
SUBJECT: Staff report for upcoming Park Board meeting
Enclosed you should find the following items:
1. September 12, 1995, Park Board Agenda.
2. Minutes from August 8, 1995, Park Board meeting.
3. Results from Community Gardens Site survey.
4. Letter to survey respondents.
STAFF REPORT
The following is the monthly staff report concerning each item
on the agenda with the exception of approval of the minutes and
other. "Other" is listed on the agenda in case last minute
items come up between now and the Park Board meeting, plus,
cover any other concerns of Park Board members and/or
attendees.
COMMUNITY GARDENS SITE
On August 2, 1995, I mailed a letter to 59 residents surrounding
the Moore Property site (5100 Grove St.) requesting input
regarding the creation of community gardens.
Of the 59 letters mailed, 40 people responded, a response of 680,
which is considered exceptional.
Of the 40 people who responded, 27 opposed the idea of a
community gardens at the Moore Property site and 13 were in
favor. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that we not
pursue further the concept of a Community Gardens Program, unless
a specific neighborhood makes a formal request for a Community
Gardens in their local park.
Staff is not requesting any action formal action on this agenda
item, unless there is consensus to further pursue the matter.
PARK IMPROVEMENT PLAN
Edina Park Board members should have received a memo from me
dated August 28, 1995, regarding a proposed plan of action for
the two bond referendum issues. As stated in that memo, the
Edina City Council has asked that the Edina Park Board, with
assistance from staff, propose a plan of action for the two
referendum issues.
Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that the Edina Park Board
propose to the Edina City Council the formation of a Referendum
Team and a time table.
Edina Park Board action is requested on this agenda item.
0 1995 SURVEY
COMMENTS ON COMMUNITY GARDEN AT THE MOORE PROPERTY
Absurd! What little nature we have left in this city, you want a gravel parking lot?? Take
advantage of the nature park, adults and children will benefit.
I would prefer if the property was left as it is now. It makes a great wildlife sanctuary.
We do not have enough natural woods in Edina.
Wasn't this property acquired with federal funds for "open space"? Is this open space? If there is
parking it should be screened behind existing trees/shrubs.
This would not be welcome into our neighborhood. Especially the removal of the barricade and
parking spots.
This should remain a wildlife meadow - we do not want parking, traffic, etc. Please think of
something else.
This land should be a natural PARK.
Moores sold this property at a low price to the City with the understanding it was to remain as a
wildlife park. Let's keep the faith. Secondly, as a nearby property owner I do not want the extra
traffic and people the community gardens would attract.
In our meetings you said you understood the value of open space. The park is well used and
appreciated as it is. Don't pull the rug out from under us!
Please factor this strongly. Removing the existing driveway barricade would be a major mistake -
there have been too many "kegger" parties in this site, which I have cleaned up. Either way: please
DO NOT remove the driveway barricade.
Let's get Melody Lake cleaned up!!!
We don't need the additional traffic - car access to the property or on -street parking - not a great
idea!
I strongly object to bring a parking lot across the street from my home in Edina. The property left
as is, is a principal reason why I purchased my house. I am also very concerned about the amount
of traffic it may cause.
Perhaps this idea has some merit, but the negatives, in our opinion, outweigh the positives.
Good idea. Would like it available for cross country skiing in winter.
We do not object. Provision for parking appears minimal. Design should allow for expansion.
As this is a curve, residents will oppose street parking. Rules should cover fences, clean-up,
Sunday use of power tools, such as roto -tillers.
The only concern I have is that the younger children in the area like to play there (ages 8-11).
They play in the wooded area - I wouldn't want them to not be able to play.
How are the 12 selected? Interested in a spot. Also like the idea of a trial basis. Hope no
chemicals/sprays will be allowed.
It really is an eyesore the way it is now and cannot be enjoyed in any way presently.
Community -no. Neighborhood -yes. See no reason to make a parking lot until you get some
experience and see what the demand is. Otherwise a great idea.
OK, as long as it stays the same size and trees are not taken in the future.
I will not be having a garden.
Wonderful ideas, but I would like gardeners to come from the immediate neighborhood.
We feel strongly opposed to this proposal. It would create additional, unwanted traffic and we
believe the property should be left in its natural state.
The Moore Property should stay as it is: Open Space with no improvements.
Residential area, not commercial! Increased traffic hazardous for young children. Don't want
more debris and rubbish or parking lot.
Support 13
Oppose 27
City of Edina
August 2, 1995
Dear Resident:
The Edina Park Board is interested in your opinion regarding the
creation of community gardens at the Moore Property site (5100
Grove Street) that borders Melody Lake.
The Edina Park and Recreation Department has been approached by
some Edina residents to offer a community gardens program.
Residents could rent a gardening plot from the City for a minimal
fee so they can plant their own flowers and/or vegetables. The
community garden site that is being recommended by staff is the
Moore Property, which is designated as open space and is owned by
the City of Edina.
If approved, the first year the garden site would have only 12
plots (10' X 12'), which would be an area of approximately 40' X
63' (2,520 square feet). The City would remove the existing
driveway barricade and create a gravel parking lot large enough
for 5 cars on the property. No trees would be removed to
accommodate this program.
This site is being considered for the following reasons:
1) Good soils.
2) Less visible by the public (aesthetic reasons).
3) Easy access to water (hydrant nearby).
4) Currently used mostly as low maintenance open space.
However, your input on this matter is very important. Therefore,
this letter is being mailed to those who reside in the immediate
area of this proposed site. If the majority of the immediate
residents do not object to this proposal, the Edina Park and
Recreation Department will offer the program in 1996 on a trial
basis. After one year, the program will be evaluated and may or
may not be continued or expanded.
I ask that you please respond to this proposal on the enclosed
self-addressed stamped post card. If you have any questions
regarding this program, please feel free to call me at 927 8861
ext. 230.
Thank you in advance for your valuable input on this matter.
Sincerely,
c
John Keprios, Director
Edina Park and Recreation Department
City Hall (612) 927-8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927-7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424-1394 TDD (612) 927-5461
City of Edina
August 21, 1995
Dear Resident:
Thank you to all those who responded to my August 2, 1995, letter
that asked for input regarding the creation of community gardens
at the Moore Property site (5100 Grove Street) that borders
Melody Lake.
Of the 59 letters mailed, 40 people responded. A response of 680
is considered exceptional!
Of the 40 people who responded, 27 opposed the idea of a
community gardens at the Moore Property site and 13 were in
favor. Therefore, the Edina Park and Recreation Department will
not be pursuing the idea of a community gardens at the Moore
Property location.
Again, thank you for your valuable input. If you have any
questions, please feel free to call me at 927-8861 ext. 230.
Sincerely,
John Keprios, Director
Edina Park and Recreation Department
City Hall (612) 927-8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927-7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424-1394 TDD (612) 927-5461
-4r
AL
lk b16 lid!
�
'5`-
Donal O'Donnell, A.S.I.D.
TOME F,RNISWNG CONSULTANT
5605 MELODY LAKE OR.
ECI%A SS436 ( ��
TELEPHONE 1612) 926-7159
d
T � [ �J
1.. � �'S •,, `" `' l l t- lit 2 ` � " 2 v<
J
? 1� � i C( � � 1�
_.-x,1 1 S � :.
L a IL
w�eh
•-
L h.� �L�LVaL.r� 2-1 Cr CL
w I-) h•�
V., L ,�
�4 c� � i L z %- s [ rtf c L- 1:1
,,- I v. o t 5 LI
`-i--- t 4 Ir i' lh D
?s tit c�tcz 1�
4L17)
�c� Srlc-l"c�c
L c -c
—1iif-fl�
ol,s
TIt
4
wl
7/\
c E ° 0. o w m m
ca�aw�' b a
O ." -U
c
20
w N 7 0 o
t7 .Q .p
d
y g C o a o y aCi F
~
m �
C 1 w
Cn E
V oA.
a>
o 'b .
w o o co
mm3m=1
o m 0
Q 17 C
cc
V
00 0 >cr
ca
r�
d m b 4)
m
m ca
0
a a�
V m N O
(z w 7 >
P6
m � C o cc
do..,� � �
tj
4mo^
O
O
O O O U O k o
! • m aim^ Ci
a W
co O .--. �
C Z
rl
O C
O
saki ahom
o, eon.
co
ct
yPON*�"�lr �...C4
4-4
O
CL o ^ •p C ccCII
❑_
d
O C
> umi ESA czM m!9
u �
• �•
�
amiCF"c�En
o w
i••l
w°' °ti
✓
� '� '° a, bio d �., �', �
w
O
•
w a p.•u.� o y o
Ct
o U o o m
b co ai
� .,
a� -o
o•OwU C
E-
V
F Rte.
c `I �Fr 'CV Ufn
m
.b co p
coo
C co m
4i
.—
o
+� U
� � - —co
T
� V� imam
PLO03 �-0 �W��c
Ogre
Q ca C
Y
O fD (D (D er O w R (D w f1 CD iC CD
D t7 m m '•C(D
R ID p
�.`° y"cn�
El
ID C]�n (D '►JaD
°pR < w m °
1 •o l / �<�w►< Rb�y
CD G < (D o C G w
Qq
b O R C N O.7G o �' O UO'9q `~"• " s T7 < R O 5.
uwi w `� n b CL C R p b ti _ fCf C. ,•
M� rn o C— G C o o t" 0 ti a � CL .oq p-, CL 5 G o (aa' o --n J
(�+ N rY — G fD R c �' m y !+ •U tT
CL f) c< O. o G R. O � �' a. (p w ,_,. O .�• .y " s r, P. a Cr C `O rn
�• w(D •s O n s zo m •„� fD < �. �•y o CY R A G p ROmni
< G x' N �; o O �. O G CL m R owq O vOi 'a G e0�". • •
CL (D m �- .= Dq " UQ co r. 'O p H rn �"' G W m w CD
p, o
olq
03GO n m w TQmo OR ' 2) p' 'DD a f3 C .p
R CD x �' C 04 G R O w r,tr C m C • �
ti ::; M 2'o CD Rm o R ob Ci m rn
t7 > "d cr w w w w MIC
o+ CrJ w m p y
fD "( G_ cr+, 'O .�. "�' CLQ o O w O f�D m CD R. O
pr mO,q (D w O o (D Cs. G' ] (D ,y a �• e' (D �. ' lD o `D �Cn A" � fD m C (D fD Cp'1
En
a. Z C CD R o o zT M ? " CD b p w $D f- G M (GD Or^
(D m y m w R w �- w d R n G 0 w
�7
w o C O c ID LL ? a A CD O D w C ,� • o
O C R. (D n R w O.cL (D ►1 CD ►ti
C c9 (OD C C W p w< m (OD CDD 0 .0 n' . ¢' C n w (D w �D CD
t d w
,rn
oy' app w ((DM, w1 y (D O, `
M
0-0 to G G o ws (D o+ w C p A (� `,Q�� p, �1
CoCA UQ
(D rn R "% cpV•�1r �' e� •'' R R (D �. i ['%.. R Vl (D
•"( R %i `.y (D '►TR (D .°y F� (D -,Ai i� w (D (D R �'. (D V1 �. (D R (D all
CD
w ° C w o w m�O w o W CD G y� (D o
G w m c9 co C > O Cl. szz m a 7C 7 `y �-7 " a '= w p r 'rJ O r. -3
x o cw. " C �. m? CD
p w =n ° G 5° m �+
mG. 0 w CC% C o ° wC! a G m R cG. LL C, < W (~D w w o m w b ti (GD G
CD 7C' rn Q, ti C O CD R p NCL 69 m m rA p (D O (D p� O.. .
tD n w (D cr .n. R R lD ,� '� b iA O'• c. G ey+• w 'b a
° w< c v w p° R� o o c c� a cc,°, CD m w �•>C
an d O b .wt p- (D R w o w En
M
m y "y • CD r, SD :3 M '� f<) .., w a' O G = _.- (�D !fl '^' n ^~.3' • A v '7 A -,
o CZrn
F*f ct r, W o (D
Cn
n (D CL w y 59 CD Q C (D x w W p> C G
(D G r' N O. d p o o.. G p
cr � G =aqN DG 5 b ? y D �' t~D a � cn
�• p CJ' Cr p'"'j to.Oy c 5• to f�rD m nD (D vr., n• p �.
m , (D a p R
Y,toµ�=V hO
Minnesota Department of Agriculture
September 6, 1995 612-296-8578
Mr. John Keprios, Director
Parks and Recreation
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424-1394
Dear Mr, Keprios:
I am pleased to report that the area of Edina treated for gypsy moth this spring and the
surrounding area was negative for gypsy moth at the close of the trapping season. On
behalf of the staff in the Division of Plant Protection, our colleagues at the United States
Department of Agriculture and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, I take this
opportunity to thank you, your staff and the mayor and city council members for the
splendid level of help and cooperation you all provided in helping us deal with this very
serious shade tree and forest pest.
Since I began my work at the Minnesota Department of Agriculture July 1 of this year, I
was not here during those hectic days this spring when the spray treatments were being
developed and executed. However, my staff reports that without the help and resources
both in materials and personnel the city was able to provide, our success would not likely
have been so complete. In these times of shrinking resources, there is no substitute for
working together.
Of course, with a pest like gypsy moth, it is not just Edina that was spared the ravages of
this pest but all the adjacent communities as well and ultimately all the areas of the state
where this pest might thrive. So it is ultimately on behalf of the state and its citizens that I
extend my thanks. The Department of Agriculture has had a long and mutually
beneficial history of working together with local governments to protect our trees. It was
truly a pleasure to continue this honorable tradition with the City of Edina.
cc: Honorable Governor Arne Carlson
Art Mason, Director Plant Protection Division
Kevin Connors, State Plant Health Director, U.S. Department of Agriculture
• Commissioner's Office • 90 West Plato Boulevard • St. Paul, Minnesota 55107-2094 • (612) 297-3219 • Fax (612) 297-5522
An equal opportunity employer
126.21 ATHLETIC PROGRAMS; SEX DISCRIMINATION.
Subdivision 1. The legislature recognizes certain past inequities in access to ath-
letic programs and in the various degrees of athletic opportunity previously afforded
members of each sex. The purpose of this section is to provide an equal opportunity
for members of both sexes to participate in athletic programs.
Subd. 2. Each educational institution or public service shall provide equal oppor-
tunity for members of both sexes to participate in its athletic program. In determining
whether equal opportunity to participate in athletic programs is available for the pur-
poses of this section, at least the following factors shall be considered to the extent that
they are applicable to a given situation: whether the opportunity for males and females
to participate in the athletic program reflects the demonstrated interest in athletics of
the males and females in the student body of the educational institution or the popula-
tion served by the public service: whether the variety and selection of sports and lev-
els of competition effectively accommodate the demonstrated interests of members of
both sexes: the provision of equipment and supplies: scheduling of games and practice
times: assignment of coaches: provision of locker rooms; practice and competitive facil-
ities: and the provision of necessary funds for teams of one sex.
Subd. 3. (1) Notwithstanding any other state law to the contrary, in athletic pro-
grams operated by educational institutions or public services and designed for partici-
pants 12 years old or older or in the 7th grade or above, it is not an unfair
discriminatory practice to restrict membership on an athletic team to participants of
one sex whose overall athletic opportunities have previously been limited.
(2) When an educational institution or a public service provides athletic teams for
children 1 1 years old or younger or in the 6th grade or below, those teams shall be oper-
ated without restrictions on the basis of sex, except that when overall athletic opportu-
nities for one sex have previously been limited and there is a demonstrated interest by
members of that sex to participate on a team restricted to members of that sex, the edu-
cational institution or public service may provide a team restricted to members of that
sex.
(3) When two teams in the same sport are in fact separated or substantially sepa-
rated according to sex, the two teams shall be provided with substantially equal budgets
per participant, exclusive of gate receipts and other revenues generated by that sport,
and in all other respects shall be treated in a substantially equal manner. However,
nothing in this section shall be construed to require the two teams to conduct combined
practice sessions or any other combined activities related to athletics.
(4) If two teams are provided in the same sport, one of these teams may be
restricted to members of a sex whose overall athletic opportunities have previously
been limited, and members of either sex shall be permitted to try out for the other team.
(5) Notwithstanding the provisions of clauses (1), (2) and (4), any wrestling team
may be restricted to members of one sex whether or not the overall athletic opportuni-
ties of that sex have previously been limited, provided that programs or events are pro-
vided for each sex to the extent the educational institution or public service determines
that these programs or events are necessary to accommodate the demonstrated interest
of each sex to participate in wrestling.
Subd. 4. When an equal opportunity to participate in the elementary or secondary
school level athletic program of an educational institution or public service is not pro-
vided to members of a sex whose overall athletic opportunities have previously been
limited, that educational institution or public service shall, where there is demonstrated
interest, provide separate teams for members of the excluded sex in sports which it
determines will provide members of that excluded sex with an equal opportunity to par-
ticipate in its athletic program and which will attempt to accommodate their demon-
strated interests.
Subd. 5. The state board of education, after consultation with the commissioner
of human rights shall promulgate rules in accordance with chapter 14 to implement this
section to prevent discrimination in elementary and secondary school athletic pro-
grams operated by educational institutions. The rules promulgated by the state board
pursuant to this section shall not require athletic competition or tournaments for teams
whose membership may be restricted to members of a sex whose overall athletic oppor-
tunities have previously been limited to be scheduled in conjunction with the schedul-
ing of athletic competition or tournaments for teams whose membership is not so
restricted by this section. Any organization, association or league entered into by ele-
mentary or secondary schools or public services for the purpose of promoting sports
or adopting rules and regulations for the conduct of athletic contests between members
shall provide rules and regulations and conduct its activities so as to permit its mem-
bers to comply fully with this section. The rules of that organization, association or
league may provide separate seasons for athletic competition or tournaments in a sport
for teams whose membership may be restricted to members of a sex whose overall ath-
letic opportunities have previously been limited from athletic competition or tourna-
ments established for teams in that same sport whose membership is not so restricted
by this section, and its rules may prohibit a participating student from competing on
more than one school team in a given sport during a single school year.
History: 1975 c 338 s 1: 1980 c 355 s V1981 c 339 s 1: 1982 c 424 s 130