HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-03-13 Park Board PacketCITY OF
JEDI NA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612-927-8861
EDINA PARK BOARD
5:00 p.m.
March 13, 1990
CENTER LOUNGE
LOWER LEVEL, BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
A G E N D A
• 1. Approval of the February 13, 1990 Minutes
2. Edina Gymnastics Association Report - Tom Wilson
3. Edina's Forestry Report - Tom Horwath and Solvei Swenson
4. Other
REMINDER
5:00 p.m. Park Board Meeting at Braemar Center Lounge
6:00 p.m. Edina Advisory Boards and Commissions Annual Dinner Meeting
i
CITY OF EDINA
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 7, 1990
TO: Park Board
FROM: Tom Horwath, City Forester
DATE: March 7, 1990
SUBJECT: Urban Forestry Report
In this report I would like to discuss several topics of concern in urban
forestry. They include diseased tree control, boulevard tree trimming policy,
boulevard tree planting policy, and conclude with a general overview of Edina's
current forestry program.
DISEASED TREE CONTROL
The foremost responsibility in urban forestry today is control of infectious
tree diseases. As is widely known, the two most devastating diseases today are:
Dutch Elm Disease and Oak Wilt. Each has it's own biology and recommended
control procedures. With Dutch Elm Disease, the primary control measure is
prompt sanitation of all trees infected.
Last year 573 Elm trees were marked on public and private property. There were
402 on private and 171 on public property. With few exceptions, removals were
achieved in a timely way. Last year, I initiated a method of prioritizing trees
for faster removal of diseased elms. The trees were removed quickly to prevent
the spread of infection into the roots and to adjacent healthy trees. This
method will most benefit the trees in the Country Club area where many elms are
left that may be root grafted to each other.
Another popular form of Elm Disease Control, injection of Arbotect, is now
questionable. Last year, if anybody asked me about this, I would have
recommended it if they could afford it. Many boulevard elms in the Country Club
area are injected which is paid for by home -owners.
At the Tree Inspector Workshop this year, the main speaker was Dr. Alex Shigo.
He is a past chief of the U.S. Forest Service and spent many years dissecting
countless trees to study their defense systems. Currently, he owns Shigo Trees,
Inc. and spends much time lecturing. Through his dissections, he has found that
many previously accepted tree -care practices don't work and some could be even
more harmful than beneficial to trees. Injections are one thing that he feels
could be more harmful.
Because of this, I can no longer recommend injections without reservations. I
spoke to Mr. Tom Prosser, owner of Rainbow Tree Service, which does most of the
injections on private and public trees in Edina. He expressed much concern over
this. I suggested he get more involved with therapeutic pruning. This is a
procedure that, simply stated, prunes out Dutch Elm Disease when caught at an
early stage. It is a procedure that I've seen work in trees and extend their
lives. Of course this method does not guarantee anything beyond removal of one
infection. As stated, to be effective it must be done early in the infection
stage and thus trees must be under close scrutiny.
It is my hope that our own tree crew can be more involved in this procedure.
They are aware of how this should be done. The thing that is most important is
promptness. Time is very critical to make this procedure successful.
OAK WILT
Until last year, Oak Wilt control was treated the same way as Dutch Elm
Disease. Trees were marked and ordered removed within three weeks. This
control measure in many cases will only speed up the spread of oak wilt. And,
with oak wilt, not all of the trees need to be removed. Only a certain
percentage of them will produce spore mats and thus be infectious.
Last year the City hired S. Kunde Co. to control oak wilt in the City. The
methods he uses are recommended by the U of M. For further information on this
disease, please refer to the report submitted by S. Kunde. Throughout this
summer I will continue to monitor the effectiveness of his control procedures.
TREE TRIMMING ON BOULEVARDS
Should the City retain the responsibility of boulevard tree trimming or should
the City pass this responsibility to the home -owner? Currently, with the City
controlling boulevard tree trimming it is a large task involving notices,
hearings, billing, record-keeping, calls, inspections, answering complaints. At
times it would seem much easier to tell the residents that they are responsible
for one or two trees they would like pruned rather than have a handful of
personnel responsible for thousands of trees.
On the other hand, what assurances would the City have that their trees are
being properly pruned? How could the City protect their trees against being
pruned at the wrong time of year, against the near -criminal act of topping
trees, or against other harmful methods of pruning?
Last year what I saw as the major problem in trimming was not enough was taken
off, particularly with the smaller trees. I attempted to get Davey Company to
"head up" the trees more. Instead they basically continued to remove more
lateral branches above the curb -line. It fulfilled the conditions of the specs,
but required that these trees be pruned at a much quicker cycle.
The next priority area for trimming is the Country Club area. Basically these
are mature elms. If the City chooses to retain trimming responsibility, my
foremost recommendation is that a company is hired with known pruning practices,
compatible with the wishes of the City and the residents. Of course what
constitutes a good pruning job is a matter of opinion.
As far as the health of a tree is concerned, the best pruning job is removal of
dead -wood. There is much of that in the elms of the Country Club area. The
trees could benefit the most from this. Other than this, if too little is cut
off, the residents will complain and if too much is taken off, not only will
residents complain, but it could be detrimental to the health of the trees.
Somehow a happy medium must be reached. That's why it's so important to know
the pruning practices of companies, to know they will have a crew that will be
responsive to myself and residents wishes, rather than hiring a company based
solely on low -bid.
In my opinion, a good comprehensive pruning program would best be achieved by
utilizing a responsible, knowledgeable tree company; the City tree crew, which
could prune certain trees and avoid assessment hearings, and utilizing my own
recommendations on which trees need pruning the most.
TREE PLANTING
It has been suggested that the elm tree be used as a replacement tree on the
boulevard, particularly in the Country Club area. When I first heard this I
thought "no, of course not". But subsequent argument in favor of elm plantings
has swayed my opinion. There is no other tree that has the characteristics of
the elm. It cannot be replaced by any other tree especially in this growing
region. It's growth rate and form are unique.
FI
I believe that, with continued support of urban sanitation programs for diseased
trees, and other methods for elm tree -care, the longevity of the elm as
increased and with that in mind, it may be feasible to use elms as
replacements. Added to this must be the understanding that these trees will
still be susceptible to Dutch Elm Disease. I hope further discussion on this
matter can be held at the Park Board meeting.
EDINA'S FORESTRY PROGRAM - GENERAL OVERVIEW
During the summer, besides marking diseased trees, I also receive many calls to
inspect trees of many different species. Most of these calls come through the
Parks and Recreation Department. Practically all these calls must be inspected
personally. At times, with proper information given over the phone concerning
the tree's symptoms, I can tell them what the problem is.
It is only necessary for the secretaries in the Park and Recreation Department
to get names and numbers and, if possible, a small amount of information. Many
times I can determine what the problem is, as many of them are so re -occurring.
I stay up on any control practices that I can pass on.
If I don't know what the problem is, I have forms from the U of M that I can
pass out to the residents, to fill out and send to -the U of M for further
diagnoses.
I thank you for your time and attention and I look forward to meeting you at the
Park Board meeting.
EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
OFFICE PROCEDURE
ON FORESTRY CALLS
Resident calls in:
Information is taken and a forestry form is filled out.
Concern about disease:
Tom Horwath, City Forester, responds with either a
personal visit or a phone call.
Dutch Elm Disease:
Tree is marked for removal. Public tree is
removed by City contractor. Private tree, the
home -owner is given 21 days to'remove.
Forester does follow-up on removals.
Oak Wilt Disease:
If Forester suspects Oak Wilt he refers it
S. Kunde, Co. for observation and treatment.
other trees:
City Forester gives advice or refers the
resident to U of M.
Concern about trimming:
Tom Horwath, visually checks for any "dangerous"
limbs to have immediate removal by City tree crews.
Trimming that is not urgent is placed on a list for
trimming in the fall by contractor. For privately
owned trees, resident is advised to hire a company.
Calls about plantings:
Currently calls on plantings in parks have been
referred to Bob Kojetin.
Calls on boulevard plantings are handled by the
secretaries as to species recommended by the City and
location of plantings.
Calls about City ordinances:
Are handled by secretaries.
mFORESTRY DEPARTMENT
ciTr of
EDI NA
J l
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 TO
F'- ^97-8861
NAME
ADDRESS
DA
TELEPHONE
TYPE OF TREE BLVD PRIVATE PARK
AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 L/C L/I T/R FBN FBF
COMMENTS
DUTCH ELM INSPECTION- OAK WILT INSPECTION- REMOVAL- TRIMMING CLEAR VIEW- BOLT & CABLE -
BROKEN BRANCHES- INSECT & DISEASE- SPRAYING FERTILIZE- STUMP REMOVAL- PLANTING OTHER -
FORESTER'S COMMENTS
T
STUMP SIZEINCHES D.B.H. DATE COMPLETED