HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-07-28 Park Board PacketCITU CF
EDINA
J1 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612-927-8861
EDINA PARK BOARD
SPECIAL MEETING
July 28, 1988
7:30 p.m.
Edina City Hall
AGENDA
I. Consideration of Braemar Arena Pavilion Improvement
A. Braemar Park Study
II. 1989 Budget Consideration
Please bring your Park Survey book to the meeting. Thank you.
RECOMMENDATION/REPORT
BRAEMAR ARENA PAVILION RENOVATION
On July 28, 1988, we opened bids on the Phase II of the Braemar Arena and Pavilion
renovation. The results are as follows:
COMPANY
A
B
TOTAL
EAGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
PENNER DEVELOPMENT, INC.
676,000
316,000
992,000
LOEFFEL-ENGSTRAND COMPANY
696,258
719,000
320,600
303,000
1,016,858
1,022,000
C.O. FIELD COMPANY
ARKAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
704,000
718,000
322,600
320,000
1,026,600
ADOLFSON AND PETERSON COMPANY
697,200
346,200
1,038,000
1,043,400
MERRIMAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
741,599
342,500
1,084,099
HAGMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
792,000
305,000
1,097,000
STEENBERG-HENKEL CONSTRUCTION
796,000
349,400
1,145,400
S.L.K. CORPORATION
DEAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
865,600
312,000
1,177,600
830,000
468,000
1,298,000
I am recommending that we consider the Eagan Construction Company, Inc. at $1,020,000.
This also includes a $28,000 figure for an add alternate for sprinkling of the pavilion
over the ice. All the other portions of new construction are sprinkled, but a suggestion
to sprinkle over the ice was made by the building department.
On Thursday, July 28, a special Park Board meeting was held to consider the overall
Braemar Arena Pavilion renovation and a planned suggested list of how to raise revenue to
pay off the bonds for the total project. The total project right now stands at
$1,819,200. Attached are the Park Board minutes and the discussion that was held on the
recommendation of the Park Board to proceed with the total Phase II A and B bid. The Park
Board recommendation is as follows:
Jim Fee MOVED THAT THE PARK BOARD APPROVE PHASE II A AND B OF THE BRAEMAR
PAVILION PROJECT AND THAT WE ALSO APPROVE AS AN OFFSET TO THE EXPENSE THE GOLF
PROJECT THAT WOULD INCLUDE NINE HOLES AT BRAEMAR, LOOKING INTO THE POSSIBILITY
OF PURCHASING THE GOLF DOME, AND LOOKING INTO THE PURCHASE OF NORMANDALE FROM
OPUS. THE PROFITS FROM THE ABOVE GOLF FACILITIES ARE TO OFFSET THE EXPENSE
GENERATED BY THE PAVILION PROJECT. Bill Jenkins seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Bill Lord MOVED THAT THE REVENUES GENERATED BY THE EXISTING BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
FACILITY EXCLUDING THE NEW NINE -HOLE REMAIN WITHIN THAT FACILITY'S BUDGET IF AT
ALL POSSIBLE. Mac Thayer seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
10
to
4q
The following is a recommendation that could be considered for immediate revenue for
paying of bonds which are as follows:
New Nine Hole Course
Edina Hockey Association Commitment
($15/player x 800)
Braemar Figure Skating Club Commitment
($15/player x 100) 1,500
Golf Dome Lease 15,000
Capital Plan ($217,000) 10,000/yr
Arena Operation 20.000
$ 120,000
12,000
TOTAL ANNUAL
$---178, 500
In this recommendation also is total construction of a new nine hole course with the
following budget:
Cost of course including irrigation and well $ 1.5 million
(one additional maintenance building)
REVENUES
35,000 rounds/year @ $11 $ 385,000
OPERATING COSTS
Annual Maintenance $ 125,000
Operating Costs (rangers,
starters, etc,) 20,000
Debt Service (20 years) 120,000 265,000
NET PROFIT OR (LOSS)
$ 120.000
You will also notice in the Park Board minutes that consideration was given to purchasing
the golf dome and also trying to acquire the Normandale Golf Course. It also suggested we
do not immediately improve the Normandale Golf Course but use the basic revenue that it
could produce in its present condition (approximately $60,000).
NORMANDALE GOLF COURSE
OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
f0: City Staff
FROM: John Valliere
DATE: July 28, 1988
I have walked the Normandale Golf Course and looked at the maintenance and clubhouse
building. I have talked with Mr. Robert Jankowski who manages Bloomington's Hyland Golf
Course. I have visited with Mr. Don Herfort and Mr. Jerry Pirkl, golf course architects,
regarding the redesigning and renovation of the Normandale site.
I believe there are three questions which need to be addressed from the city's point of
view:
1. Is there a need for additional golf facilities in the city of Edina?
2. Is it financially feasible for the city to purchase, redesign, and operate the course
so as not to be a burden on the taxpayers?
3. What alternatives could the city use the land for that would be revenue producing
instead of removing the property from the tax roles?
QUESTION 1
Yes, present golf play is still on the increase. Golf, being primarily an adult
recreation and given our city's aging population coupled with more leisure time, will
reate an even greater demand on our present golfing facility at Braemar.
QUESTION 2
The present course buildings and equipment are in questionable condition. Major
expenditures would be required to renovate the fairways, tees, greens, and irrigation
system to place the course in an attractive playing condition. The clubhouse is in
marginal condition. An outline of these costs are as follows:
Course reconstruction on top of peat $ 400,000.00
Clubhouse, moving present one or a new building 80,000.00 (minimal)
New maintenance building
Equipment to maintain course 50,000.00
Road access and parking ? ?
Course hardware and incidentals (signs, ballwasher,
benches, etc.) 10,000.00
Maintenance prior to opening
Professional services (architectural and engineering) 30,000.00
TOTAL (without land costs) $ 570,000.00
NOTE: Golf course construction costs remain the same whether it is built here or
elsewhere. At this location, the course would be smaller than elsewhere, and
possibly on more difficult soil conditions. In addition, the layout may be
cumbersome, given the surrounding homes and offices.
EXPECTED REVENUE AND OPERATING COST
Revenue
30,000 rounds @ $5.00 per round
Net on food concessions, rentals, equip. sales
Approximate total annual income
Expenditures
Maintenance personnel services (1 full time,
1 full time temporary, 4 seasonal)
Maintenance materials (fertilizer, chemicals,
repair parts, gas, supplies, etc.)
Administration personnel services
Supplies (score cards, office, etc.)
Utilities (phone, heat, electricity, etc.)
Total Expenditures
APPROXIMATE NET PROFIT or (loss) before debt service
$ 180,000.00
25.000.00
$ 205,000.00
$ 50,000.00
30,000.00
35,000.00
10,000.00
20.000.00
$ 145,000.00
$ 60,000.00
Bloomington's Hyland Golf Course consists of two small courses called an outside and
inside nine. These were paid for outright on a general bond issue. The outside course
would be comparable to the Normandale Course in length (approximately 1500 yards). The
net profit at this facility, which includes two courses, is as follows:
1979
$ 47,800 -
2
courses
1980
33,200 -
2
courses
1981
64,900 -
2
courses
1982
59,500 -
2
courses
1983
55,000 -
2
courses
The present green fee on the outside course is $5.30 per round.
QUESTION 3
I looked at the aerial of the site to try and determine the feasibility of converting the
area to a practice driving range. This would be complete with accouterments of practice
sand traps and a putting green. The problem: There does not seem to be 300+ yards of
open ground without the interference of the central pond. However, if this could be
overcome, it could be a fairly high profit/low maintenance facility. The premise is that
you can turn the hitting spot over for $3.00 in 15 to 20 minutes versus $4.50 for 1.5
hours.
The next possibility which I explored was a smaller 18 hole pitch and putt course,
possibly even 36 holes. This could mean less expensive renovation and upkeep. It would
also mean fairly quick turn over in dollars. However, this type of golf is not usually
for the serious golfer and appeals to the impulsive person for an hour's recreation.
Ideally, it adjoins other recreational facilities or large shopping centers. If run
successfully, they are highly profitable. Lighting of such a facility, would greatly
expand the income. I did not explore non -golfing revenue producing facilities.
The bottom line is approximately $600,000 plus land costs.
0
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
NEW NINE HOLE FINANCIAL PROJECTION
Revenue generation from additional nine holes of golf at Braemar:
Cost of course including irrigation and well
(one additional maintenance building)
Revenues
35,000 rounds/year @ $11 =
Operating Costs
Annual Maintenance
Operating Costs (rangers, starters, etc.)
Debt Service (20 year)
TOTAL
NET PROFIT OR (LOSS)
$ 1.5 million
$ 125,000
20,000
120,000
$ 385,000
$ 265,000
$ 120,000
Such a course would not be in playable condition until the summer of 1990.
BRAEMAR ARENA RENOVATION PHASE II
A: Total completion of pavilion with locker rooms and walls
B: Complete commons (connecting building)
COMPANY
A
0
TOTAL
EAGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
676,000
316,000
992,000
PENNER DEVELOPMENT, INC.
696,258
320,600
1,016,858
LOEFFEL-ENGSTRAND COMPANY
719,000
303,000
1,022,000
C.O. FIELD COMPANY
704,000
322,600
1,026,600
ARKAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
718,000
320,000
1,038,000
ADOLFSON AND PETERSON COMPANY
697,200
346,200
1,043,400
MERRIMAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
741,599
342,500
1,084,099
HAGMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
792,000
305,000
1,097,000
STEENBERG-HENKEL CONSTRUCTION
796,000
349,400
1,145,400
S.L.K. CORPORATION
865,600
312,000
1,177,600
DEAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
830,000
468,000
1,298,000
Recommendations:
Eagan Construction Company, Inc. 992,000
Recommend that the following be deducted from Eagan's bid:
Masonry work on outside of pavilion east and west ends 13,600
Lockers in the figure skating room 6,900
Sound system 15,000 35,500
RECOMMENDED TOTAL EAGAN CONSTRUCTION
PHASE I 956,500
PHASE II 691,200
1,647,700
ARCHITECT COST 108,000
TOTAL RENOVATION 1,755,700