HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-03-14 Park Board PacketThere was no Agenda
for the March 14, 1978
Park Board Meeting
(Attached are the documents that were with the minutes)
Gun Range_ Fund
Statement of Income and Expense
City of Edina
For Year Ended December 31, 1977
REVENUE:
Ranger Fees
.Rifle
Pistol
Trap
Pirearm Safety Instruction
Sale of Ammunition
Sale of scrap lead
Sale of brascards and targets
vending machine
Total Revenue
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries and wages;
Supervisor and clerical
Maintenance
® Light and power
Telephone
Insurance
Supplies
Concession commodities
Clay targets
Ammunition
Other
Total Operating Expenses
Income (loss) before depreciation
Provision for depreciation
NET INCOME (loss)
40
Increase
1977 1976 Decrease
$ 1,305.46
$ 1,718.00
$
412.54*
4,522.00
3,861.74
2,201.66
660.26
4,805.00
2,934.00
168.07
1,871.00
215.00
212.00
22.05
3.00
$10,847.46
$ 8,725.74
$
2,121.72
2,313.75
1,981.35
-0-
332.40
295.07
155.20
317.19
139.87
260.70
236.54
$16,041.38
24.16
615.76
598.80
$(2,498.00)
16.96
$ 3,485.28
$ 2,971.89
$
513.39
$14,332.74
$11,697.63
$
2,635.11
$ 6,917.20 $ 5,888.23 $ 1,028.97
299.85
1,268.49
968.64
$ 7,217.05
$ 7,156.72
$ 60.33
2,201.66
2,677.79
476.13
185.28
168.07
17.21
91.28
69.23
22.05
226.66
513.37
286.71
617.40
559.50
57.90
2,135.55
-0-
2,135.55
3,246.44
2,929.25
317.19
120.06
121.70
1.64
$16,041.38
$14,195.63
$ 1,845.75
$(1,708.64)
$(2,498.00)
789.36
58.60
58.60
-0-
$(1,767.24) $(2,556.60) $ 789.36 *
POISON IN
�b 1 ?• N
\\ \ ...
_ I
J.
-11 - e U1 I
SU, b 01 iv i S I If --**.r "
Normandale-Carr Replat
REQUEST NLIM13ER : _ S-78-4
LOCATION: North of W. 66th Street and
East of Parnell Avenue
REQUEST: 4 lot
Subdivision
r/
xinmr (1[untiWS fkp0rin1m
STAFF REPORT
February 1, 1978
S-78-4 Normandale Carr Replat. Located north of W. 66th Street and
east of Parnell Avenue.
Refer to: Attached May 2, 1973 Planning Commission Minutes,
Normandale - Bessesen Replat dated 1973, and
proposed plat and Parkland Dedication report.
In 1973, the Commission reviewed a four lot subdivision (i.e. Normandale
Bessesen Replat) of the subject property. At that time, the Commission
approved the requested subdivision provided that the proponent revise the
subdivision by moving the west line of Lots 3 and 4 further west and the
south line of Lot 1 further south. Following this meeting, the proposal
was dropped and the subdivision never received final approval.
A new subdivision (i.e. Normandale-Carr Replat) has now been submitted which
is very similar to the plat proposed in 1973. In conformance with the Planning
Commission's past request, the west line of Lots 3 and 4 has been moved
westerly by about 10 feet and the south line of Lot 1 has been moved southerly
by about 20 feet.
• Recommendation:
Staff believes that the realignment of the lot lines provides improved building
sites in comparison with the previous plat. However, staff suggests that due
to potential setback problems, the west lime of Lot 4 should be moved an
additional 10 feet westerly and the south line of Lot 1 should be moved an
additional 10 feet southerly.
With the above modifications, staff recommends plat approval with the
following conditions:
1) Subdivision dedication in accordance with the attached
report.
2) Utility easements must be provided over Lot 3 for
existing services to the structure on Lot 2. These
services may have to be relocated.
3) A drainage easement may be necessary over the swale
on Lot 1.
E
Edina Plcrning Co-,,;=ics:ion —3—
S-73--6 G
St�E�t, o.^.:;t�oi__;;i: �2'z_'�oc: �1: c^L•:
(4710 t�_•:t 65th SLrcc�c). -
May 2, 1973
?-7 Iocntcd north of ti;cst 64-th
(--^3t of lirr:iv-1a1 Avcrx`d
W. Luc: notad the property location 2nd presentl_1 the proposed foi-ir let
subdivi:-ion. HI_ rated additio ..al lland was obtained when ' yon aad Par..ell Avanc.�s
were vx:--ted to 66th Stccet. One house erist3 en the pro.32rty.
The t la-uting C='icaicn g_neral y cgrecd tha prap _ray s_iould be more evanly
dividc3, rmd fo 3 im ing diEcuso-ion, Kr. Hughes roved the a"a?,d:ivi5ion be cpproved if
the p opoment c -Pees to ravica the preliminary plat by =:�-Aao Cle wast line of
Lots 3 :end 4 (p--.opcsed) l'urthar t3ast and the south 11na of Lor I (p opoced) fu=' _r
south. If ttze n. -rep -ca -ant dr'as not a3rea to rake OIL- chem;; 2s sUS")'ested, t .'_� cn:bc i.Ji3i.on
as ori,:'.nc1l.y &-a-win nhou.1ci be returned to the Pi az ninfl, C^i.'St? £3^u7.Cn for further €. t_,Ld�o
Mr. Go 170h—son seconded the motcien. All voted ay a. Mo -:ion car":ied.
V. REl..CI.IItGS:
Z-72-6 F.clocotion
?'.eaityR '. { -2 Co.s_ztTET Hr'7:'��a o•' mnr nil -Is)
lcca�c.1 r'Vt. C LIY - L I 1'L i.P-1
7r;:.
f.MIZ Lof l9 e- 07,
✓Genarn:
4026.c}�}3 [.
c_'_1: �iS.�J. �' :'% C� �,.
�'.0 f ._^:.��
C4-n"fn F' i�7 t �ct�?c`?i(ji�iP c%
�L X:ii:•1 1 c'£;i ' C-. -,,n
Dis tric,.
Mr. Luca noted the davelope:. has p=dhazad the D,-ncn2s pa opart7 d'r: ctly east
since Pais request was icsc revie7 ad. The present prcposcal :U cludcs 1.44 units in
24 "cimAen styl(I " s�'_ucmn:es = 27.12 ac-zes (5.16 units -)e,t`,Cr2)c A land trade,
Would b t iu-7oly d Ln L'ilat: ehe deraloper would g:;_va 1.91 acres to Draa'..ai Paris rim
for .8) facia of park pro °l rty '_Il -no-her a:ccio j Po 1'i �S �.t.^.1CCt CCi3Caps.
apprc, a . co-ld re rv! nted at this t im2, ha•��evvz. fintai dl". TeloFr` gat 31a .a r:�lst include
det:aila,1 enginen:.ing graph-.2.co., Q subdi.ai"+ion, cad the of deads.
in reply to Mr. G. 10:r_son, Mr. Luce e..plaired ttn,zt Gle,.son Road will connect
to Mh Street, probably at: Mart;h Road.
Mr. Pale CL_-- arnx reprecant:3mg he owner end drive _oatr, p04-97ted out the
"good"' , :::d 'bad" soil arcc,a, and i i Eica x—ti about 60' -65% Q:' -he .3 flite, including
ro£ad3' l:ill v=a1in green. Gii3a�%.".:'"a... X<c Gt'- tcd--prova' l io ear}•. rc u',oted at: tries 1�1`_. '
only u3:' cu_:."..z.I' r, or t%iG -a:,, nd1^eticvx the Plarny ng. E�.Ci �£la/:'.0 1 t � �17t Ili'.%►:o
Mr. L_q'__- end Mr, t,,rj C._- ::3? ertc(i the C.Ciio t:v ba red --cad from 5 tQ 4 ui -its
per cmd Ini`. ra.;=s a it .-cited t hsy v*are v.orcc co arcrrcu with 0,3
buil.c��n,.t3
a, -,d talc i'iaj:-z.-:g cca_Assica -e_zeral3y
c: r " ti! the g=:.eral come=tat: and d.asi.gn. %.,o fvrthar action
ft ;3eccl ::`l^.y .•; 3%' :i. �.� C.a.,._e e:i �J:i
Wc£. tnic, :a.
z-7;--5 P-_rrcl A. 's'^<�. ^.n_ �'_:'__:c�:__^ t C' _:- niat�-Qi1- vc^T:C ;'311 1�Cntt�3 sec*�`.h
Of}'..'3yi..�' '{ t 11fj F :�ra�:: 'l:. _'1 i:^ _ .^�..jT'- _'t�C'lst;..�..• : L y3� C - t C
LC`.:Ai:'✓ t. ! :.ii: �_.i "�L i!!`�'ss7i:a'_e:Ci:^c 'J.-Citz.ci-to rulyi".S
Mr. Luca rccV ? 1ec? glint a 12 unit per ;acre vialt:ip1.t: residentir_1 pl..al a 30
prcocni ,:1 for th-13 p.--opc.ty last rac: .410cr :.ir_z.ch ra;It:cc3 rt:t:si-?�c12:3 t-c,;nr iir.!; it3 tl?� 31Q-
pri;:Lc :.a.ad uao. Although th-3 oLzU tlo: n pre nented a piaci c:r_ntx.Cnt for indu3tr:i:21
Y/i;• e�:en�,:n .-f Nnrt/, arr. ofI vt S, a:o�,f /B, i�/�r�»r,d�/�r"
h
LQ
Z
xcfy
1• — /l',J CXlr,�s:c,� of Nsr!n /aie , •� �r-
ti r �1
i c_.;_�
jco
z t
21445
>
A. 4 55.
q:f
to
I
4
in Cj
14 40. - 1. 1;,,
C. PLAT OF 07 Is
t BLOCK: it. I.:
745.0Z 20
sor. z
•245.02
Z A-006DON 000. ;Z
ts
2-5 2 4�?t 245
W. 65 th ST
fof- :, .
245.3/ a. CL3,17
j
6 iAJ
— " :� �
15
f /r5t U3
.4 �4 5� — _< - T-3
V5`9 So
5 .9 41,
C-)
'2 9 750 61 F.
- - , . I mi 2O
0
fj,*,
z 0 f F.a. 2a;:9 :j W 7 '- I --13 1LANE
4(.2
co
Z:
10
L
22
3' -3
12
let
V IE?
20
'.7:
j9.
ILE
e
Kom
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
Subdivision No.
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAPID SIZE: 7 c; .�N. LAND VALUES dd
L.a'�A'
'
(By: �� Date
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
11 A. grant an easement over part of the land
EJ
B. dedicate % of the land
t4C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
® land dedicated)
j� 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
U beneficially expands the park.
El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
.� 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his -
I1 --11 toric value.
F1 6.
B. Cash Required
M1. In all other instances than above.
2.
0