HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-11 Amending Section 850 By Establishing A Time Limit For Apporved Final Development PlansORDINANCE NO. 1999- 11
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 850 OF THE CITY CODE
BY ESTABLISHING A TIME LIMIT
FOR APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph C of Subdivision 2, of Subsection 850.04 of the City Code is amended
by adding the following subparagraph 11:
11. Lapse of Approved Final Development Plan by Non -User; Extension of Time.
a. If a building permit has not been obtained, and if erection or alteration of a building,
as described in the application for final development plan, has not begun within two
years after final development plan approval, the approval shall be null and void
unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or
improvements has been granted.
b. A petition for extension shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk within
such two year period. The petition shall state reasons showing why a building permit
has not been obtained, or why erection or alterations have not commenced, and shall
state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The
petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing and decision in the same
manner as then required for an original application. The Council may grant an
extension of up to one year upon finding that:
i. there is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or
improvement will commence during the extension, and
ii. the facts which were the basis for approving the final development
plan have not materially changed. No more than one extension shall
be granted.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication.
For purposes of this ordinance final development plans approved prior to the effective date shall
be considered to have been approved as of the effective date.
Adopted this 16`h day of November, 1999.
First Reading: October 19, 1999
Second Reading: November 16, 1999
Published in Edina Sun Current: November 24, 1999
Attest 44 1
i Cl rk Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss.
newspapers
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
Frank Chilinski, being duly sworn on an oath states or affirms, that he is the publisher of the
newspaper known as Sun -Current , or the president's designated
agent, and has full knowledge of the facts stated below:
(A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constituting qualification as a
qualified newspaper, as provided by Minn. Stat. §331A.02, §331A.07, and other applicable
laws, as amended.
(B) The printed public notice that is attached was published in the newspaper once each week,
for one successive weeks; it was first published on Wednesday, the 24 day of
November , 1999, and was thereafter printed and published on every Wednesday to and
including Wednesday, the day of , 1999; and printed below is a copy of
the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being
the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice:
abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz
Publisher
Subscribed7dayof_l",�)&_,
onthis'., 1999.
0 MERIDEL M. HEDBLOM
NOTARY Pusuc MINNESOTA
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 131,8008
RATE INFORMATION
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users $ 2.55 per line
for comparable space
(2) Maximum rate allowed by law $ 6.20 per line
(3) Rate actually charged $ 1.30 per line
CRY of Edu
(Official Publication)
ORDINANCE NO. 1999.11
AN ORDINANCE AAMMING SECTION 960 OF
THE CITY CODE
BY ESTABLISENG A TIML IJWT
FOR APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MIN-
NESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph C of Subdivision 2, of Subsection
850.04 of the City Code is amended by adding the follow-
ing subparagraph 11:
11. Lapse of Approved Final Development Plan by Non -
User; Extension of Time.
a. If a building permit has not been obtained, and if erec-
tion or alteration of a building, as described in the appS-
cation for final development plan, has not begun within
two years after final development plan approval, the ap-
proval shall be null and void unless a petition for exten-
sion of time in which to commence the proposed work or
improvements has been granted.
b. A petition for extension shall be made in writing and
filed with tke City Clerk within such two year period. The
petition shall state reasons showing why a building per-
mit has not been obtained, or why erection or alterations
have not commenced, and shall state the additional time
requested to begin the proposed work or improvement.
The petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing
and decision in the same manner as then required for an
original application. The Council may grant an extension
of up to one year upon finding that:
i. there is a reasonable expectation that the proposed
work or improvement will commence during the exten-
sion, and
ii. the facts which were the basis for approving the
final development plan have not materially changed. No .
more than one extension shall be granted.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be ef-
fective upon its passage and publication. For purposes of
this ordinance final development plans approved prior to
the effective date shall be considered to have been ap-
proved as of the effective date.
Adopted this 16th day of November, 1999
Attest
Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Dennis F. Maetzold
Mayor
(November 24, 1999) DI/ Ord 99-11