HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-09-13 Park Board PacketEDINA PARK BOARD MEETING
Tuesday, September 13th, 1977
7:30 P.m.
EDINA CITY HALL
AGENDA
I. Approval of Minutes: Park Board Meeting,
August 9th, 1977
11. Planning Reports
S-77-19
2-77-17
S-77-20
2-77-15
III. Lou Larson Property - Townes Road
IV. Art Center Report
V. Recreation Report
Ir ' ' ,•r 1 1 ,�: � 'Fti ` , (. ' .. � •• `r ` •
COUNTRY CLUB DST
- aiC` 't"ti' aY SECT. LOT I1?AUD. UD. 172 ...... 2637.29Zes..
� -oci, 15 `�: a 7
raa o 7r / — - 150 i. I36.1S 9
- �a.1—� T54+�q5 111 r P �i �� 0
a 15 c l N� ��; o o n ® t1_AIra:4. { u*`• h WHITE
v, c� � fi 1 '^t 'r',, �c i �Q �' Z v a' � - � %s• v � �'fi�':
--.. 1..
/! M. I 1'ci•�I t�\.�. -9j IS , •,Dy N�i1✓• •b.,. q n
° ^OAKS 3v
!16l�s.;r4) I r 57 IG2'IBti
4,> 31 54 1 54
s � 4"F�:.KSUili'Jl SIDE f� '' ,
p J 3,u �•• \ Ansi.'_
� ,;s
,ra ° r u ,9 r ; r �•�`°�r' .R n z 1 d'�' • VMTE
8451)1( 12`- '4V,2 �clviy IDi n ` . L 4
30 _
Z I •' —i � a � ,f,s. u. Gh r..v 1•` OAKS_____
a 6V 6 6 0°% �I�1� 2G & Y.• C' Pe A 1y.T 25 C,.
r7 r.73
c� 7 AAA
?.4� _ m ;, :1 ,s. t-, r •� �, O. .P
o c R•288 i� 11Ci�aD mwt5S '1� \ r 0
{{� Z% . _ol ° y u o �? 0 3 43 7.53.2
Jr h Vi o 7 w ta^ N ` , ♦.• 15... .Ci 't F� ( tu.a 1'•"j7
%31Bd , -(2,8 ver -- ' �'___ � , . '-.1 6f �; Irr,�. �:`� L�,� -� p ''• ..
6 aq ••`a - �'id - 1 _!31.18 S ? ! =05 5_ ' `.. `' t 12
S\ 3 �r� �• ,�.
7 s -'_ j3z2a 6
C3 i 43 % .r' e' T r1,4
7�lj
ems. o,
100 7.4
ZZ g °1 y
:38.x5 1 - 133.53 _ • I 14�
i� • 2J'tf jf� 1�_3.d2,o 1_ i�1 c J 'Ar
_p -,i --� !'.9 �1! _ t.l ,Zn,� .fin_..,' 2i\�1'•i'�yea _-fi.ES^
�..4 _J34.1-. j T a. it V. -iv
' 1tJ <•.t4'
�.� , "� I� •^ � I •G . r, Y � r 12 A t t q P` -n' 1 5•�:,i. - �,� ., �' �. V J..� -14 ( 51 ,.
fj
A.•
a' v
4
L.3
1 u7 r J' R • i 1 !t t f ��-'j'
}iib -^.j;4.::. _.�_ �^ •;� / l: P.. j �Ca.h l.a�i. °,' ; ics 1• I_`A TLY
C _,.•v♦ ,Tr .� !L5 o ,'Z''�, i r 14 �•''� — 2
a4 ? r0
33 z
t 3 6� .1 q•:t.0 r M44 l -
r. 304
3z-- ,�- � - -...._ �-- '0 yG• - 1 '- ,9r ... -
V l!i
2A �~ �Y` — S•�T i3 f IOC -
JJ {
S Z Me 6'0 •'•Je w v 7•r0 so r,,� - C •
WHITE ..0
Zo �,, 19 ,�1 z �y 1 ,=1. Z x, �.
lf�A
�T
117
Tit
A ---4
MAP
S
Tj
dvi'ls it
REQUEs'r NUMBER: S-77-19
Generally located SWI of Annaway Dr.
LOCATION:
REQUESTOne new single family lot CAT 17
:
1-t000, t----
0 2:iu 5,00 -450 100o
Subdivision No. P--
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
it A
SUBDIVISION NFu'7E: �s" d � i. i _ *
LAND SIZE: a t`�•�e..��...""`"LAND VALUEll��J
(By: �� Date : q )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
tiA. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ 0 as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acrt:s or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
L
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding, or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
F-1 6.
B. Cash Required
s 1. In all other instances than above.
2• ..
EDINA PLA14NI14G COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 7, 1977
III. New Business:
2. Subdivision Subdivision of Lot 29, Rolling Green. Generally
S_77_19 located southwest of Annaway Drive and southeast of
Bywood West.
Refer to: attached graphic and parkland dedication
report.
The owner of Lot 29, Rolling Green proposes to divide the subject
property into two lots measuring 61,260 square feet and 39,250 square feet
respectively. An existing dwelling is located on the larger lot.
Many large lots located in this subdivision have been divided in past
years. The proposed new lot which measures nearly an acre is generally
similar in size to other lots which have been created in this. neighborhood.
v-,.mnanrintion: Staff recommends approval of the subdivision in that:
1. The size of the new lot is generally consistent with surrounding properties.
2. Adequate access is available to the new lot.
Approval is recommended with the following condition:
1. Parkland dedication per the attached report.
GH:nr
9-2-77
PLAIIIIII4G CO'' USSION
STAFF REPORT
September 23, 1977
S-77-19 Subdivision of Lot 29, Rolling Green. Generally located
southwest of Annaway Drive and southeast of Bywood West.
(Continued from 9-7-77)
Refer to: September 7, 1977 Staff Report
The Planning Commission will recall that this proposed
subdivision was continued until the September 28, 1977 meeting pending
installation of proper subdivision signs on the site.
GLH:ks
9/23/77
Cr
-- W
LOCATION MAP
z
subdivision
REQUEST NUMBER: S-77-20
Generally located S. of W. 63rd
LOCATION: and West of Warren Avenue
REQUEST: One new single family lot
village Planning department village of edina
z�
z
subdivision
REQUEST NUMBER: S-77-20
Generally located S. of W. 63rd
LOCATION: and West of Warren Avenue
REQUEST: One new single family lot
village Planning department village of edina
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 7, 1977
III. New Business:
3. Subdivision Jeam Addition. Garth O. Holmes. Generally located
S-77-20 south of West 63rd Street and west of Warren Avenue.
Refer to: attached graphics and parkland dedication
report.
The proponent is the owner of the home situated on Lot 2, a portion
of Lot 1, and a portion of Lot 3 of Block 7, Normandale 2nd Addition, as
shown on the attached graphic. The proponent proposes to purchase the re-
maining portion of Lot 1, which is being offered for sale by Hennepin County.
The proposed replat would combine the easterly portion of Lot 1 with the pro-
ponent's property and would divide the westerly portions of Lots 1, 2, 3,
and 4 to create a new buildable lot which would front on West 63rd Street.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed replat in that:
1. Adequate access is available for the new lot.'
2. Adequate setbacks and lot sizes are maintained for the existing developed
lots.
Approval is recommended with the following modifications and conditions:
1. The remaining portions of Lots 3 and 4 must be identified as. Lot 3 of the
new subdivision.
2. Parkland Dedication per the attached report.
3. An executed developer's agreement.
Final approval is contingent upon acquisition of Lot 1 from Hennepin County as
proposed.
GH:nr
9-2-77
.,ORF IN E. TH07-1-P C"j-
N
ra N,
WILRYAN AVE.
6 IRS?
FlR$T 'AO ti
-4
TiNGOALE
Cyll
+iqiKINSON ADD
0
ki I L D r -,E C
Ir r>3 Z
r
o
uj
C:)
CQ
0
>
cl
WZ
M
Cs
v
f
A
i
.(or GAIZl N HbLME
v1AN04LE 2 NO ADO/TION
,-DCIATES, INC.
E y O R S i
!i343 Yeone 612.941.3030
Drawn F3 Date N OfZTH
r
R O
�O
4
(Ti',, 6E
,4Gc7�>U/1VE0 FeOM NENNC-P/N
CA,)
i
IL.0''
N
W
L O T
2
/• S�eY 0
/9, 380
.scz r -T
5.0
�
Fen naE
6Ak4C,- N
' T
/•S70rY FRAME
Hal,16 1.304
U1
LA
N
IV)
N
A
N
LOT /
Z
/0, /40 -s4 Fr.
'
I
167. IS
,
+NU
mI
Q
P
`
1
r
3
Subdivision No. 5
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE:) 4o LAND VALUE: 2.5;; C5 2�)
(BY: ,�iC Date: 9 Z )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
11 A. grant an easement over part of the land
EJB. dedicate % of the land
XC. donate $ _�) -7 5 as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
land dedicated)
j'—j1 If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
(1 beneficially expands the park.
El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
El3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
r] 6.
B. Cash Required
X1. In all other instances than above.
11 2.
LOCATION
LJt I J"L
F
77
FF 1 F79- Fr
tel'QUbdiv-`S,T,,,0r•1
IL
zoning -
C7)
Z-77-15 and
REQUEs'r NUMBER: S-77-16
LOCATION: E. of France & S. of 55th St.
REQUEST: Subdivision to create two
Single Family lots and three Double
Bungalow lots.
MAP
r- -IE-3-F-
�jr— I
F-
village Wal, dng-(-1-4zumxi=n1 velingre of edin
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 7, 1977
II. Old Business:
3. Subdivision Phillip Smaby. Woodbury Park Second Addition. Gen -
S -77-16 and erally located east of France Avenue and south of
Rezoning West 55th Street. R-1 Single Family Residence Dis-
Z-77-15 trict to R-2 Two -Family Residence District. (Continued
from 7-27-77).
Refer to: attached graphics, parkland dedication
report, and letter.
Approximately one year ago, the Planning Commission considered a requested
rezoning for the subject property from R-1 and R-2 to PRD -2 Planned Residential
District. This rezoning was requested to facilitate construction of nine
townhouse units on the 72,000 square foot site. Following study of the
proposal and based in part upon considerable opposition to the proposed from
surrounding property owners, the Planning Commission denied the requested
rezoning.
The proponents are now requesting a rezoning to R-2 Two Family Dwelling
District for the western and southern portion of the property. The present
R-1 zoning is proposed to remain on the eastern and northern portion. The
attached five lot subdivision is also proposed for the subject property. Lots
2, 3, and 4 are proposed to be zoned R-2, while lots 1 and 5 would remain as
R-1.
The proponent and surrounding property owners have petitioned for
the vacation of a twenty foot wide alley located on the southern portion of
the site. This vacated alley has been incorporated into the attached subdivision.
Although this petition for vacation was considered by the Council on August 15,
it was continued until September 12, 1977, for further study.
Recommendation: Staff and the proponent have met on several occasions to
formulate a workable division of this property. Due to the very unusual shape
of the property, a conventional development such as that proposed is somewhat
difficult to achieve. In that the drawings which have been submitted are
somewhat conceptual, staff would not recommend final approval by the
Planning Commission at this time. Staff, however, would recommend concept
approval of the rezoning and subdivision request with the understanding that the
proponent prepare a survey and preliminary plat for the September 28, 1977
meeting. Staff would recommend concept approval in that:
1. The requested R-2 rezoning for lots 2,3, and 4 are appropriate due to
the site's proximity to France Avenue, a cemetery, and other R-2 develop-
ments.
2. Access to all lots from the proposed cul-de-sac street is desirable to
avoid direct access to France Avenue.
3. Lot sizes are generally consistent with surrounding properties.
PC Staff Report - S-77-16 and Z-77-15
Page 2
4. The proposed development is consistent with the low density residential
character of surrounding properties.
Concept approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1. Realignment of the lot line between Lots 4 and 5.
2. An acceptable developer's agreement.
3. Parkland dedication per the attached report.
4. An easement, deed restriction, or some other suitable means to ensure no
direct access from Lots 2 and 3 to France Avenue.
5. Vacation of the alley on the southern portion of the site.
GH:nr
9-2-77
qo
cr I
9
qo
cr I
July 15, 1977
Mr. Gordon Hughs
City Planner
City of Edina
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Subject: Proposed development of vacant lot
cemetery east side of France Avenue
Dear Mr. Hughs:
The Jordan -Sandstone
Homeowners Association
Edina, ?Minnesota
between 55th Street and the
South
The committee of the Jordan Sandstone Homeormers Association agreed at a meeting
held June 27, 1977 to the ioilocrin points regarcing the proposed development of
subject property as outlined on the attached sheet.
The neiehboncood would not sanction any zone changes from R i to R2
as proposed in the south east corner of the property.
2. The neighborhood would want assurance that the water issue would not
be raised again; and that the developer would put in his own wells or get
water from the city via hookup west of France at the expense of the
developer alone.
3. The neighborhood would want assurance that the proposed street, curb,
gutters, sewer and any other service would not result in assessment
to any of the existing neighborhood property owners.
These concerns were discussed and approved by the neighborhood at a meeting
held July 10, 1977.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other
member of the neighborhood association. I can be reached at 922-2420.
Sincerely,
Lee
Lee Christensen
Chairman, Committee on Issues
.,C : pc
cc: Mr.Jerry Hanson - Bermel-Smaby, Realtor
Association File
Subdivision No --7 "— 41to
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION Ri-TORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAI -IE:
LAND SIZE• %ffj, C0 1- Cte 51117/C4 LAND VALUE:
(By: �ly , Date: 7 )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
0 A. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate o of the land
9 C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
El3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
2.
0
LOCATION
19iM:1lgry ;
I�
O
II Ly4•N�:
WHIT
W
2�y+M
ST
C,
i
�N
•
_�__._
air
19iM:1lgry ;
I�
O
II Ly4•N�:
WHIT
W
2�y+M
ST
C,
19iM:1lgry ;
I�
O
II Ly4•N�:
--
i
•
_�__._
air
subdivision
REQUEST NUMBER: 5-77-20
Generally located S. of W. 63rd
LOCATION: and West of Warren Avenue
REQUEST: One new single family lot
village planning department village of edina
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 7, 1977
III. New Business:
3. Subdivision Jeam Addition. Garth 0. Holmes. Generally located
S-77-20 south of West 63rd Street and west of Warren Avenue.
Refer to: attached graphics and parkland dedication
report.
The proponent is the owner of the home situated on Lot 2, a portion
of Lot 1, and a portion of Lot 3 of Block 7, Normandale 2nd Addition, as
shown on the attached graphic. The proponent proposes to purchase the re-
maining portion of Lot 1, which is being offered for sale by Hennepin County.
The proposed replat would combine the easterly portion of Lot 1 with the pro-
ponent's property and would divide the westerly portions of Lots 1, 2, 3,
and 4 to create a new buildable lot which would front on West 63rd Street.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed replat in that:
1. Adequate access is available for the new lot.
2. Adequate setbacks and lot sizes are maintained for the existing developed
lots.
Approval is recommended with the following modifications and conditions:
1. The remaining portions of Lots 3 and 4 must be identified as. Lot 3 of the
new subdivision.
2. Parkland Dedication per the attached report.
3. An executed developer's agreement.
Final approval is contingent upon acquisition of Lot 1 from Hennepin County as
proposed.
GH:nr
9-2-77
a r L. n ;'� n J Qii• 'tORI f I ` E. !1 HO rer
CQ
WILRYAN AVE.
/^�--• iT
f!. ." NIRSCH BRQsr°?
'FIRST AQP.. I.
R a
S. \
G• TINGOALE
e
Yti
C] POLE .,vr_.
z 4l \i�J n �, �"(/1 � •J _ .P-, � ,�! Cu � a� C ! P n e' Z - I � - `- � I .
'z
_ I HAN\JKIMSCIlti ADD
O
W Q I tQ{:
c WLEFEC _ Rte^ .. v �. AVE
In, v m m� •. vim'_ �i_/T+ r.a a c jm ?1_ r• t
MA^DACKERS 3 "'
e s 3 Q ti a
111111 —CHARD �? I = _ Kt �:• I 7 2nA ~4C0
a` 1 `' PEPG'E v fe
c, Sjc P I) t r °dDGPEN A_ OC`�RrP
o
'j' 4 t c . I - • _ \P �'' pfd •� { t�t
A S i .e. I 3 ',ti f- o oK ii ,-lza
��
..._ 9 .� _ T..t ���' _` � Q � � n H _ ` Lam' �o .;, .3�� .- �` n• >"' `j, :rw �:� f` � 111 G�'� Cl
LA
d' M31A3Jtl�jcr-
} 'u[ 3i J , �. %�/j (fie ,•\ ., ��\ •� ,
ct
' h `° , � yds%h• .. -4�� �"
- •' �` -'"` c. ^r .+ iy t yt y' ' y' ti /\\�-� .,Lr ��i t
. v
r
\ /
r r
it GAS+ HbLME -
rvf AiO4LLEZ hP A00lTi0N
- i
;pCIATES, ZNC.
f y o R s y
ss343 ahorit e,aoao NORTH
Drawn 8 Date Date
SCAIF i "- Zo'
3
,5
/ r,I �• . J (7b BE AGQU/RED FGM HEN/JEP/n/ GO,)
f L-•
Q
-- -- --- to ---- 5
L O T Z S.o
/•5�Y /9,380 34 fT �
F.e%ME
0
0 fiA�AG6 N +_•; -T /•smCY FRAME
N L _ N htX*E/F!o'SO4 Q Ul
N
N
LOT a 3z .3 Z
/0,/40 -W
a
i.
J
Subdivision No. 5
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE: D ) 40 ! 1 ( L•LAND VALUE:
(By: Date: 9 Z )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ -7 as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
* land dedicated)
11 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
T--12. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
j—� 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
r] 6.
B. Cash Required
X1. In all other instances than above.
El 2.
LOCATION MAP
zoning
subdivision
REQUEST NUMBER: Z-77-17 & S-77-18
LOCATION: SW corner of Olinger Rd. and
Vernon Ave. So.
REQUEST: Subdivision of three doubles
and four single family dwelling lots.
village planning degwrtn,ent v'llage of edina
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 7, 1977
III. New Business:
1. Subdivision Peter Deckas. Deckas Addition. Generally located
S-77-18 and at the southwest corner of Olinger Road and Vernon
Rezoning Avenue South.
Z-77-17
Refer to: attached graphics, June 2, 1976, Planning
Commission minutes, parkland dedication
report.
The Planning Commission may recall that a subdivision and rezoning
request was proposed for the subject property approximatley one year ago.
Ab that time, an eight lot subdivision was proposed which included three
R-2 lots located on the western portion of the site. Access to the site was
proposed to be from Vernon Avenue. In its review of this request, the Plan-
ning Commission suggested that the proponent redesign the subdivision iy
1) reducing the number of lots, 2) providing access from Olinger Road rather
than Vernon Avenue and 3) locating the proposed R-2 lots along Vernon Avenue.
The present subdivision request as presented by the proponent has
been redesigned in conformance with the Planning Commission's recommenda-
tions. Lots 1, 2, and 3 which abut Vernon Avenue are proposed to be zoned
R-2, while Lots 4, 5, 6, and 7 would be R-1. Access to the subdivision would
be via a short cul-de-sac from Olinger Road. In addition, the total number
of lots has been reduced to seven.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rquested rezoning and
subdivision in that:
1. The subdivision has been redesigned in conformance with the Planning Com-
mission's recommendations.
2. The mixture of R-1 and R-2 uses is appropriate in this location.
3. Access to the subdivision via Olinger Road is more desirable than from
Vernon.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1. Access to Lots 1, 2, and 3 must be via the proposed cul-de-sac and not from
Vernon Avenue.
2. An executed developer's agreement.
3. Parkland dedication per the attached report.
4. The berm located on the northern portion of the site must be located en-
tirely on private property and not on public right-of-way.
GH:nr
9-2-77
Fal)-A.1IP .T I_� tl �.�.FL
1 A 4 U S U R v E Y U R S
,.-941 i010
Pei -Cr G, Deckc�s, c7w��or- - L�.ieloper
�=. � Ico : ov,tio�E„i-al C•-.
Phone lD3S-Z2o4 ')Z-7,54:11
LCCzAL
tioT�
etevat,or Shown +l!hv5„ `"c I,� I �r^,ciiGr+es
rOPO Seri i7G 5CmN.�t T�OOr C,�eVG1 f'10✓1
NORTH
5C,Ole 1"4C,
tj
Av
r
Subdivision No- ---F-1--�
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: �' V t i I tJV 1
G 3d trias D;����
LAND SIZE: "�, J�•�a� 'f'SlyocalR�s LAND VALUE:
(By: Date: '7 )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate of the land
C. donate $ �r �O �� as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
F
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
�beneficially expands the park.
II 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
0 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
r] 6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
2.
i
4
S-76-9 Deckas Addition. Generally located at the southwest corner of Vernon
Avenue and Olinger Road.
AND (REZONING)
b �.
Z-76-7 Peter C. Deckas. Generally located at the southwest corner of Vernon
Avenue and Olinger Road. R-1 Single Family Residence District to R-2
Multiple Residence District.
Mr. Luce explained the property in'question is presently platted into five lots
(lots 1-5, McGary Addition) and is zoned R-1 single family residential district. The
6-2-76 Planning Commission Minutes, page 3
Western Edina Plan indicates that lots along Vernon Avenue could potentially be used
for low density attached residential development.
Mr. Luce recalled the developer was informed during several discussions that
the staff would recommend against any R-2 zoning on Olinger Road, that no egress onto
Olinger Road would be allowed, and that any R -2's should egress onto Vernon Avenue.
As a result, the developer is proposing to replat the property into eight lots with
access to Vernon Avenue via a short cul-de-saced road. Three lots from 15,380
square feet to 16,875 square feet would be platted on the west side of the road and
are proposed to be rezoned to R-2 for double bungalows; the minimum lot size for an
R-2 lot is 15,000 square feet. Five single family lots would be located along the
east side of the road between that road and Olinger; four lots would be 9,360 square
feet and the fifth lot would be 11,100 square feet. The minimum size for a single
family lot is 9,000 square feet, and the lot sizes in this neighborhood are about
12,000 to 13,000 square feet.
Mr. Luce presented a sketch prepared by the planning department staff illustrating
another amnner in which the property could be divided into eight lots. He clarified
the sketch was presented only to indicate that there are other platting alternatives
available which would decrease the amount of road right-of-way, thereby increasing
the lot sizes, and which would be equally or more advantageous.
Mrs. McClelland felt access on Olinger Road would be more desirable than access
on Vernon because of the considerable amount of traffic and great number of driveway
entrances and exits on Vernon in the two -block area between Olinger and Blake Road.
Mr. G. Johnson agreed. Mr. Hughes suggested the number of lots be reduced in order to
increase the minimal lot sizes proposed.
Mr. Deckas, the proponent, indicated access to Olinger Road would be more
difficult than access to Vernon Avenue because of the topography, which slopes sharply
down from Olinger to the west.
Mrs. P. L. Dudek, 6021 Vernon Avenue, stated that traffic on Vernon in that
area is steadily increasing and more curb cuts would only aggravate the problem.
After lengthy discussion the Planning Commission generally agreed the project
should be redesigned with access to Olinger Road. Mr. Runyan suggested the R-2 zoning
would be more appropriate along Vernon Avenue, and Mr. Hughes suggested the number of
lots be reduced.
Mr. Thomas Wagner, 6056 Olinger, objected to the development as presented by
Mr. Deckas because his front yard would face the rear yards of the single family lots.
He added he would also object to an access on Olinger, as suggested by the Planning
Commission, because he "would not want the traffic from two double bungalows and six
houses exiting onto Olinger across from my driveway".
After additional discussion, Mr. Hughes moved the requested subdivision and
rezoning be continued to the next meeting (July 7th) to give the developer an
opportunity to meet with the staff and to redesign the project, based on the
suggestions made by the Planning Commission, with the road access onto Olinger
instead of Vernon. Mr. G. Johnson seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
LOCATION
MAP
.HEN
subdivision
REQUEST NUMBER: 5-77-19
Generally located SW of Annaway
LOCATION: and SE of Bywood West.
REQUEST :One new single family lot
vilinge Planning department village of cdini
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 7, 1977
III. New Business:
2. Subdivision Subdivision of Lot 29, Rolling Green. Generally
S-77-19 located southwest of Annaway Drive and southeast of
Bywood West.
Refer to: attached graphic and parkland dedication
report.
The owner of Lot 29, Rolling Green proposes to divide the subject
property into two lots measuring 61,260 square feet and 39,250 square feet
respectively. An existing dwelling is located on the larger lot.
Many large lots located in this subdivision have been divided in past
years. The proposed new lot which measures nearly an acre is generally
similar in size to other lots which have been created in this neighborhood.
vecommendation: Staff recommends approval of the subdivision in that:
size of the new lot is generally consistent with surrounding properties.
,ccess is available to the new lot.
,pied with the following condition:
- the attached report.
1.: 1-1
I'v
%4'
r.oa:)----
. :.AL t Ee•
:-•
`,
:..Ao
_ GUI::'.'.: R � �.�:'.':SG:. •: .� \ ..,'
S E -
�-t
41,1001-
2.00 1
�•'` •1,iiMY -Awl
�%
160
•U
Ile
/39,250
�C,.': V� :`171000
., •_ %�
4•. ...j,1�:
,.\
.i
� r;� ACLS• S _ _
/-y-.� f
`
\\ ♦ ,3.000 �'/• ('`�' �r 1 .� ,.
�.
f�
I'v
%4'
r.oa:)----
. :.AL t Ee•
:-•
`,
• ''
_ GUI::'.'.: R � �.�:'.':SG:. •: .� \ ..,'
S E -
�-t
41,1001-
2.00 1
�•'` •1,iiMY -Awl
�%
160
•U
Ile
/39,250
�C,.': V� :`171000
., •_ %�
4•. ...j,1�:
,.\
.i
� r;� ACLS• S _ _
/-y-.� f
`
\\ ♦ ,3.000 �'/• ('`�' �r 1 .� ,.
�.
f�
fk p6cz 'r
`
v _'.Y • V • � �y �„� x;.11
LON
Of
lk
i,
K_ ` •1
.j
41:
Subdivision No. 41:5:77-
11 -
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME :
till .l1� ^_
LAND SIZE:ae �� 1 LAND VALUE: -O� lJ?I-ev
�
(By: �/� Date: q v ? )
The
developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
-r
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
11 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
II 2. If property is 6 acr`s or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
jJ 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
-11 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
r] 6.
B. Cash Required
_1. In all other instances than above.
2.
�.0CATION
subdivision
zoning
Z-77-15 and
REQUEST NUMBER: S-77-16
LOCATION: E. of France & S. of 55th St.
REQUEST: Subdivision to create two
Single Family lots and three Double
Bungalow lots.
MAP
r
Village planning deprtm_ent v'1lage of edina
PC Staff Report - S-77-16 and Z-77-15
Page 2
4. The proposed development is consistent with the low density residential
character of surrounding properties.
Concept approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1. Realignment of the lot line between Lots 4 and 5.
2. An acceptable developer's agreement.
3. Parkland dedication per the attached report.
4. An easement, deed restriction, or some other suitable means to ensure no
direct access from Lots 2 and 3 to France Avenue.
5. Vacation of the alley on the southern portion of the site.
GH:nr
9-2-77
t!/E57 r, � -Ah 7-17 F,7-
Crz�
t
o
°r
f G-
Fi.F'T"`�E ROVA
A13$OCIATEB
warhtto..-sn ywuiuero
C�3G0 W'fBth. YH roar
lr:e.ihlhh RP4;a[S
July 15, 1977
Mr. Gordon Hughs
City Planner
City of Edina
Edina, ;?innesota 55424
The Jordan -Sandstone
Homeowners Association
Edina, Minnesota
Subject: Proposed development of vacant lot between 55th Street and the
cemetery east side of France Avenue South
Dear P'x. Hughs :
The committee of the Jordan Sandstone Homeowners Association agreed at a meeting
held June 27, 1977 to the following points rega& ing the proposed development of
subject property as outlined on the attached sheet.
The neivhborhood would not sanction any zone changes from R i to R2
as proposed in the south east corner of the property.
2. The neighborhood would want assurance that the water issue would not
be raised again; and that the developer would put in his o,m wells or get
water from the city via hookup west of France at the expense of the
developer alone.
3. The neighborhood would want assurance that the proposed street, curb,
gutters, sewer and any other service would not result in assessment
to any of the existing neighborhood property owners.
These concerns were discussed and approved by the neighborhood at a meeting
held July 10, 1977.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other
member of the neighborhood association. I can be reached at 922-2420.
Sincerely,
Lee Christensen
Chairman, Committee on Issues
"LC : pc
cc: Mr.Jerry Hanson - Bermel-Smaby, Realtor
Association File
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE:
7A.1 tQ'T- 1.79 tic Z 5101q/2S LAND VALUE: —'C"' 0e) O
Subdivision No. '�� Ito
(By: ��'� Date:
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
EJA. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ '2 J DC7 as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
11 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
rj 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
F1 6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
j—� 2.