HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-11-08 Park Board PacketEDINA PARK BOARD MEETING
Tuesday, November 8th, 1977
7:30 p.m.
EDINA CITY HALL
AGENDA
I. Approval of Minutes of October 11th, 1977
II. Planning Request: Z-77-17 & S-77-22
III.
Planning Request: S-77-23
IV.
Planning Request: 5-77-24
V.
Planning Request: Z-77-18 & S-77-25
VI.
Senior Citizen Report
VII.
Athletic Association Report
VIII.
Capital Improvement Update
(Community Development Funds - 1977)
IX.
Recreation Report
OPEN DISCUSSION
U
L,A,*-,C.AT10N MAP
Y
:—I\— \tcr
r-- HYDE as
1 PARK
..•t :fit ', 'f'^•�•:� J 1
:• ''f t -fir .J—
��;.. S�bO'4PJiE BRAE OR
RCHSRY-it1�
A N G E :•�r'' 4.s 4 4
'�� t Vit' L� t :'.� '� %.•> � � `` �r.
L1
V
zoning
A G E
subdivisiolv-%l
Braemar Hills 9th Addn
REQUEST NUMBER Z-77-18 & S-77-25
LOCATION: E. of Gleason Rd. extended and
N. of W. 7801 Street.
REQUEST: PRD -2 to R-1 and R-2 Districts
Replat and rezoning of townhouse project
for 29 single family and 16 two family
villi t of �riirts
YLlagP t,{nnrrinY_t{cu�lritt•nt aY
•`_
'rte R r---71
.
t
'�� t Vit' L� t :'.� '� %.•> � � `` �r.
L1
V
zoning
A G E
subdivisiolv-%l
Braemar Hills 9th Addn
REQUEST NUMBER Z-77-18 & S-77-25
LOCATION: E. of Gleason Rd. extended and
N. of W. 7801 Street.
REQUEST: PRD -2 to R-1 and R-2 Districts
Replat and rezoning of townhouse project
for 29 single family and 16 two family
villi t of �riirts
YLlagP t,{nnrrinY_t{cu�lritt•nt aY
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 2, 1977
S-77-25 and Braemar Hills 9th Addition. Generally located east of
Z-77-18 Gleaseon Road extended and north of W. 78th Street.
PRD -2 to R-1 and R-2 District.
Refer to: June 27, 1973 and August 1, 1973 Planning
Commission Minutes, Hills of Braemar Town-
house graphic, preliminary plat.
Four years ago, the subject property was rezoned to PRD -2, Planned Residential
District to allow the construction of 132 units in the form of 33 quadraminium
buildings. The location of such buildings and appurtenant access roadways
are shown on the attached graphic. To date, 4 quadraminiums and a
recreation building have been constructed in conformance with the approved
development plan for this property. In addition, the property surrounding
these completed units has been platted as Braemar Hills 8th Addition.
The proponents are presently requesting a rezoning from PRD -2 to R-1 and
R-2. A 45 lot subdivision is also requested. As proposed, the 29 lots
located in Blocks 1, 2, 3 and 4 would be zoned R-1 and the 16 lots located
in Blocks 5 and 6 would be zoned R-2. Outlot A which measures 3.56 acres
would be dedicated to the City according to the proposed subdivision.
As compared to the previously approved PRD -2 plan, the present subdivision
proposes to use essentially the same building sites for R-1 and R-2
dwellings which would have been used for quadraminiums. Stonewood Court
which is located northerly of Gleason Road is located on nearly the same
alignment as proposed by the previous plan. The alignment of Tanglewood
Court has been altered significantly to provide additional sight distance
for traffic approaching its intersection with Gleason Road. Excluding
existing and planned quadraminiums in Braemar Hills 8th Addition, the
present plan proposes a reduction in the total number of dwelling units
from 112 to 61 as compared to the previously approved PRD -2 plan.
The Planning Commission may recall that the protection of the heavily wooded
steep slopes on the property was of such concern when reviewing the previous
PRD plan. The present subdivision proposes to limit considerably construction
on such slopes and proposes to dedicate most of these areas to the City.
Staff is somewhat concerned with the relationship of the subject property
with the vacant lands located easterly. The Planning Commission will
recall that a development plan entitled Indian Meadows was approved for
thi-- property several years ago. However, this property has been sold
recently and the present owner has indicated his intent not to proceed
with the Indian Meadows concept. Of primary concern to staff is the
advisability of extending Stonewood Court on the subject property into the
property to the east to provide a secondary means of access. Therefore,
staff believes that adequate right-of-way should be reserved to facilitate
the extension of Stonewood Court if warranted by the development of the
property to the east.
Braemar Hills 9th Addition
• Page -2-
November 2, 1977
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested subdivision
and rezoning in that:
1) the proposal conforms with the Southwest Edina Plan.
2) the heavily wooded steep slopes on the site are adequately
protected.
3) the realignment of Tanglewood Court is desirable.
4) adequate setbacks from existing and planned
quadraminiums are maintained.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1) lots 8, 9 and 10, Block 4 must be identified as an
outlot to facilitate the easterly extension of
Stonewood Court if warranted.
2) a storm water storage easement must be dedicated on
portions of Lots 1, 2,4, 5, and 6, Block 4.
3) an executed deed to the City of Edina for Outlot A.
4) an executed developer's agreement.
5) relocation, removals and re -sealing of existing storm
sewers, water services, and sewer services per the
attached preliminary engineering report.
6) dedication of a 15 foot wide strip of land on the north
edge of Lot 14, Block 4.
7) submission of a suitable landscape plan for Braemar
Hills 8th Addition
8) all activities relating to the landscaping and snow
removal business located on Blocks 5 and 6 must be
terminated and all equipment, materials and supplies
removed prior to final plat approval for any portion of
the subject property.
9) within 180 days following final plat approval for Blocks
5 and 6, all dwellings and structures located on Blocks
5 and 6 must be satisfactorily removed. A performance
bond in the amount of $5,000 will be required at the
time of final plat approval to assure removal of such
structures.
10) submission of an erosion control plan.
IGH:ks
10/27/77
Z•-72-6
r.�?.';c-�:i�� ^».7.r�, i'c::c^.1_. r:�2.5
ro'? - •'.,; ^s^� r.
T. ��6
-a 7--73
R;-� t. .• �.:'�zlc_
'�.1•c,��t: c:-_.
_�.
= _ c.:
:�;rL:�.
•].
For!", .c n ai
z .��. r n :rho:..:1-c_r
�_, , :�.�
.......
�.
t ,�i•i_i;- : r.L �Y=•'1.1.':i
$a't..y.3 Y. ;zs.i�i• .,_�":...
�', t.rtict
...__
Mrs Luce presented a revised project booklet and j:ci~ ea ou
cations :neve been rzacie purau_nt to DY::ict!J FZ_.^.*:a::n Cc.` :aAon sv-,-e3tic:a, la=;cn
Load will ccnnoct to 73th Strect east of Mazn Road,
goal of leaving Drrenar Puri: eu.zou-nced by Load r''2;ht of v:a� rind of :laLr ng P
784.:h S6 *:o3t: co:u-icct to Gleason v t hin the Vil a ;e 1-2-mits. 'The hen
to 4.67 units per acro, rind the tcE:agr---hy and veg:►:a:t:ion at th•s rorthc:_r: e:ld of the
site w4l"I be p_asa vad. A CJ1 p* cr!:r;:y hill beea pu -ch :scd so tie neo j cc%
is "ta--I ly planned" and any prot-ris_ons into the site lin-i.-a been e' fminatad, Appro::i-
�$tezy acres of .p--rkl= d vill "t:a dcvnt:ed to the Villr: were ;:n ,:_ll aont--- i -;te
about ran acr3 to t hc! dc: elOL:ie ::; c -.-:3h ::aa t he r.=cu-.It Oi '' cf .he Ir-iJ lc':a(l value Of
additic' 1. acreage necessary to the f=-11 pc.rl..'.and ba
receivc_t in li-_u of Lha land dcaution, Pend v -ill b:9 in acesr-'trice with
the So.. �.:::art Edina ct o.�l acs r ,, y . i' ^ct'•- c - �.:''' *= "i :3 Co
,'-T �L 'i, Tire arc:. ".e 1: s ate: o �.e:l ria .:
that &II dri-,ra3 comz from tha sides Of Che C:..1.1Li::�� GDdS.•Fn- th:9 'rGr-t of ..`1e -,-nil--n
and all=.:rins the garage stalls to L•c scrz:zacd. Xr. Lz%e-a r.eccz=�-need :_pprc Y 32 .:or the
reasons otated in the staff report,
Mr. HL ;:les questioned tl:c, cut rind fill invrolvcd, nrd ''Ir. Tet::e e--Ani:ned the
only cc.tir:3 is in that arca Wilicil ilc9 alread;• UC:c'ri erc�-Lvrtcd to ror•n3 off '41-2 slope
and g_v;:e sora topogrs.phy to the uni.t-. Zee filli:n.- on top of the Bill i- w'nor, the
grade 1:3 90* and has to be filled to 1✓r:ca a n:i.ope rather th::n c ctasp grr-13.
In reply to M -e. Ilu,)hen, the es;-cicpe:7 slid the pr Zee All. range
to $60,000 per lniit. Each four mit bul_? ding trill tppaar as a Si.:igl a t=a.r_E:y :loins.
2tr. 1;ern ccf.ancled the c?c.f.,1ep:.rs fci^;, a s:e,ll p :-rl: dc. linti,:ial yet
request -7-n- lens &M-, ty than wo ild have b --,oil undZi: the .:OL'::bw: !St �-J -n 3 1 la.l.
Piro l�i!i'. .2. 1:12_-;1 Mc rcd Co-accpi: Z y)Z: `71:1 l:c to
1ci repo i . Ur.. D-' a -I S'i:.Co.ai:a ' 1..:� :'::' LL':i •a :171 '70i 'il 3'3. Pl,1Z:;.iia C' .:l
tion i•^_..'.o
ZJ-73-6 Re ccs_ tion T - s� n• Pr_.rcc'..s I: 2 ,_IC -211, E' : 3825. S, S., T �ll
717-21,
.:r 1 c: (� cf
�-' and no:c th c_
D1: �iiCi: CC -2 �: ''_:� ]L}t S:OC.af:�:? -.1 r _Lj.• .r, r L DF T:?Lr+p._
l•tEll t i'T �):`i :ti'r ? iJ'1.'�� • �
Mr, Luce refe-"anted the pro -lest booklet proviced by the proponent, and
noted final 3evelopzzant plan ap? ov
al is --requested for `'C;;nio.�,irii:ns for Edina". =ile
final dev3i 7inent p3.ana conform to tl:a concept ap?meal gra.zt.ed, therefore approval
r(:CO1SV:3':'•3d, iUr the rCu::. 15 Sti:'aE�l in the st:�a'_L Zarort, sv0ject to an Fl, roJC'.3
plaC, tra:..i.:_r of title-- prior to rin.:.1 d2•7alopmcnt plrn r p?zovsl by tha Council, r.nd
revocation of the pen -n - t haid by J, A. Da.1.2ns,. lie explained that
becru:.e t:::a developr,_nt pians ap-*noved IIra Laced on the exi:,ting grades, the zoning
sLould be dt.::;ied if any further :;rndi-r,-, occurs.
!f Jt:ck -t!cl.lt,r: the r..ch'tc:ct, pl-e:ne:?t,ld s^viral character sketches of
., ;:''s i'.nd exto j or pis:li:�r� , 711 ':c;%I (:O IVVI;:109.3,
Ie noted two L•edruoa
the urtit %
un':'lta vile r --:!Il fol $48,000 to `7 n .7., and i'lao bedroc, i and den unit:. gill sell :`or
to $7Q,'1: 7, mors a: a 33 bvi::c!llg::; 1:1 are split. lc%ela and 21 are two stoner..
1'f•_, Runyan r.o--ed the re7ril{:.;; from 1? -i -.o I'RT.-•2 aad the final develop'3'nt
p;:.nu be ,.r:rayed, late: the r,:r �d 1y LIM! eta::f. Mr. Ilughes scc:one.ed
the. rictio.l . fill aur.cd :-v,: ^.d„
_ .1• ♦ . �`� : -_- .ter �._::.. i a=-.. `♦�• '
o / �
7
1
.Ile ol
OD
.f
1 MARTM ROAD - - '\r '- %•
�d�� filo n �� ... .. •' ••
1
j' f'1 e ' � t q� .�► �i�tl 01 Y� s� il�r�:'�
'�c'n`u3�r" .l�u� 13 5 for �a.�:,
��VILLA GErASSXIMES'OF ED_NA OEVCLOPERS''
..::�� 1 • r I;41•�ti IK000
%•1?' • S• 'f' ' ,�I^ t�.��, �.r,_!"..iplY
11
.•lry�
I2 . 2 0 (3.l o°R , 4 0 00
tv East
1
3 t 146.co �
H .^ 4 � t79•T �
O' Q 9afs a 9
;.fi` •` • 1 • ,.•.•: �� .:.,: ".. : „ _j 125CY��• IZ,00� �IT,bw4 R °�° I boob' a °Q ,
f` - • '•�
f to jq.,56 I
'lop' R
ONE
AE OR
M, 000* 11,4�ot 1'i,Boot
� �R ♦ °S ,. ..� 2 N9i 49'40'E
�� :- 5 q4 Is,.,z ,oqs•► too 137.45 --- — -
ti ... K69'S3 b?'W3, �v , -
N �� ) 1 1 'If.aV
` 1 9 l
s•�r i,' ; ' 'ha •�� 1 �P' / // / � I inl �,1� � M���" 1 � � \ \ 1(0� � � �orai� Com.
' s
'+..'". - Vf � �,�pd � / / /�: �1G'3�i ��\ li►,r�? %i j�/�/ � 1 I11I� 19
�..v 4 r / I Ni'll BRAEMAR HILLS
r� ,,, 1 I /11111 N L
(7kA
rt1S��l\ g\ s \��/I � v ✓ \�\�1�\\11.vtll�I, 1, 11 I ter' o��•
\\ - 1 \\ ss3�9t2f i 1 I i\\` ��� 1/ /l , ;I' i \[ t i . I / \
b� N
• \�13, 1 nl' � ► I,'lt\�/�•//i%i /il 1111 ._:mss
""'
1' 8TH ADD. Sf
s2zs'
\
f'f .•;. , � b �I
�i
/ • taw �.• • S ��i',�,'•=.-sy ,�s , i�.�-!>� / / ` 7,4oaf
12zm ' \ f f 01
NOa
syW
z '
�f pS��i �'�?�' �::J � '\ `moi;/b��1 Imo•_-.�l\�'<
'• M.• 4��.;i _ X10 , ��� v�,�, Db; 't t ���� �/ II: Off{ �\, iii•-�/! i! �/' r'.j .
v ,�• '•.' • �� 4i�'� ��^v 448
$0.54S f a..� 174 CO
cla
it
7.
164
It 0
t` 41
`•'.• ��� /r/ � I 1 / .- �i" Q--- _�' /r �� t\ 11 �/� Zws`o`I � y
I
,n'%�//t 6,1 / /, .1 _i5 ta��- \ I I' 40 s,0 ' S89•SC'37"W O :_ 15,000+ p
T� `, \� ^l�oQ B . oGi 3815 ,.5
lot s
/ / / ( i 1 10 •' ''I fro cc o M
� � �i57z5
>; �+ res✓ •Do %l/ li,&�or '15, _ I�ISocb P•� 17pov : (_ )i }� � ► 40�O 13Z
• Y, 31,000' ' I sero / s Z,, /1' • p1 2 (C.S.073)'
�510�} •`foo �? D, `..00''
(64160 1 I i +. tl f•.Ir
Subdivision No.
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE: I 14 t Q cap 4,r- • LAND VALUE:
(By: Date: )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate J% of the land
ElC. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
Asia—result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
04. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
1 1 6
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
�2.
R � cl,
L-4c � \tl
MAP
subdivision
REQUEST NUMBER: S-77-24
LOCATION: SW Corner Gleason Rd. & Crossto
REQUEST: R-1 lots (25) ginrl e Fnmi 1 y
Plat
� , .,,rl�nrnt t'1lli�S' o{ ��liR•
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 2, 1977
S-77-24 The Timbers (Folke Victorsen) Generally located at the southwest
corner of Gleason Road and the Crosstown Highway.
Refer to: Preliminary Plat, November 26, 1974 Staff Report and
Planning Commission Minutes, May 28, 1975 Planning
Commission Minutes, February 24, 1975, March 17, 1975,
April 7, 1975 and Jure 2, 1975 City Council Minutes
The Planning Commission will recall that various development proposals for
the subject property were studied intensively three years ago. At that time,
the Planning Commission and City Council reviewed proposals for (1) a single
family development, (2) a development which included a 74 unit apartment
building at the base of the steep hill on the site together with 21 single
family lots on the side of the hill, and (3) a 140 unit apartment building
located at the base of the hill. Following considerable study, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of a rezoning to PRD -5 for a 140 unit apart-
ment located at the base of the hill. This recommendation was based upon
the severe damage to the slopes and vegetation, the unacceptable street. grades,
and public safety problems resulting from the proposed single family develop-
ment of the site. The City Council, after several hearings on the matter,
agreed with the Planning Commission's recommendation and granted rezoning
to PRD -5.
The proponent is now requesting a single family subdivision of the subject
property. Twenty five single family lots are proposed for the site which
have access by way of two long cul-de-sacs from Gleason Road and Indian
Hills Pass. This proposed subdivision is very similar to that reviewed by
the Planning Commission three years ago.
Recommendation: Staff believes that the subject property has been one of
the most thoroughly reviewed parcels of property in the City. Three years
ago, several development proposals were studied carefully and numerous hearings
conducted to determine the best use of the property. At that time, the
Planning Commission and City Council concluded that a single family develop-
ment in this location was undesirable due to environmental and public safety
concerns.
Staff believes that the facts and circumstances associated with this property
have not changed since it was reviewed by the Planning Commission and City
Council three years ago. Staff thus recommends denial of the proposed sub-
division.
GH:ks
e 10/25/77
11/21/74
EDIIIA PLAIIIII110 COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
11ovember 26, 19711
Z-74-11 Folke Victorsen. (The Timber:) Generally located at the southwest
corner of Gleason Road and the Crosstown Highway.
Refer to: Final Development Plan Booklet
Renuest: R-1 Single Family Residence District to PRD -3 Planned
Residential District.
The concept approval for the Victorsen's 74 unit apartment building and 21
single family homes has been granted by the City Council. The developer
then submitted the =ina1 development plans, from which the staff was better
able to determine the necessary grading and utility needs for the site.
It was found during -he review session of those final development plans
that a substantial loss of vegetation .Mould he incurred by either grading,
utilities, the retai— g Nall, or by the necessary utility provision.
At that meeting; there was a concensus of opinion from the Fire Department,
who for fire access and the desire to have a concrete building, felt a
five story building on the north side would be more desirable.
The staff environmentalist is extremely concerned about the grading and loss
of vegetation, and he, too, wholeheartedly encouraged this staff member to
rethink his earlier negative recommendation regarding that five story
building.
The Engineering Department, in their comments, detailed the amount of grading
and vegetation loss that would be incurred should the single family homes
he allowed to develop. Further, it was the Engineering Department's opinion
that the grade on Tiru erview Road was entirely too steep.
Recommendation: I still retain my earlier opinion that this proposal is a
compromise of the environment and development aspects. They are, however,
both compromised to too great of a degree.
The staff therefore recommends that the earlier submitted request for five
store apartment hui ldings be anproved, however, at a lower density* than the
12 units ner acre requested. It would he the staff's suggestion that we
allot; eight units per acre and that tine building mass he almost immediately on the
north lot line of the proaerty, thus minimizing the cutting into the hill.
If variances are nee�'ed for that location, it would further be our recommendation
that the,i be granted as part of the PRD request.
It would be understood that this development would be the final development
for the entire site and t::at the rest of the land remain open. The hest
oossihle solution to ensuring its prencrvation would he that this total site,
exclusive of the nin_mun needed for the building and construction, be
dedicated to Edina as parkland, and that a life estate or some otter instru-
nent be negotiated :or the one acre Property at the top of the hill.
S•74.16 Victoetor rn'r. r_ ^, '+11v 1_rrr ;ed a'.thr, t:rulhvent
• VAND Cruzoninn) C-1
7.74-7 Tolke VSct^t• -n (Yl:rt .t+-bar.^.)_h•nrraily located nt t1•a f.o•t;hvest
I e`uri;rr jr,, t ' ;, _--� - - : n f i }v. :i-'— ia�ily id~ I
_�-�-C t0-•1-!)-- ------:.1 Lua ri:•t.
_ -
j fir. Luce recrllcd that in June, 19711, the r.taff hnd reeonnende.l approval of
Tolke Victcrsen's maanina. r^^u^st to P!:D-3 to allow a threw stc v, 7a emit crartment
building on the unrth side of t::c Lill and 21 simple family lots on the south side.
j The concept 1,rcrnte_d at that ti::n arneared to be r:
a -od cornronise to the r._tn
^_ v
developncnt rrq[+r:t3 and oaini^n3 czprc:;sed over th± past 3.4 years, and tho rlanning
Conn13310tt and Citi ca.:ncil c3n:-.nquently r. -anted concent an7rov3l, l:h?n final
dcveloprent pl;o:s, incl•_dinn, final grading; plans, wcr: snbnittcd by 'tr. Victorson
and suhscqueritly revic:red by °f ntrhers of th_ various city do.partiirits, it uas
felt a five. &tor/ concrete huildin7. on the north side of the hill, as ee.rli^r P-.oposed,
j would have a r.ure ponitiv3 er act on all city furctioas than world the aoartn^_nt
j building/sirr;le f.tnily coacc; t :^nroveti. The Ln;!ir.aerinp• D_,^artnent h:tn reiterated
I they reel the strilot and lot slonas •:ovld be very steep, and ecnnent^d that either a
lift station wculd have to b^ 1:ro::ccd or a sawn -P pir.: would Lave to b, cut throu1h
the hill, The pualic safcty •'arnrtmcats feel The ro w•! 1!rad-: :could be too steep to
assure norval ca.,:r!:cncv cornice to ac.'r portion o^ the dove'_•,.rent. doth the
engineering and pul:llc safety dzsartcents anree the road scrvin:! the sirrlc f.:nily
residences Mr-inrview Lane) ,o;:1d present some safety orohle.ms at the entrance onto
j Indian Hills Pans du to the s':cnn grade and ca_ -re and Lecau3u the ren'tired street
surface was a12.owcd to be narrowed in the concr7it arproved to reduce tl:c cnvironv:ntal
impact, At the concept stare, cnnroval w-ts rercr-:•:r.ccd because the prnperal seen+d
to be a reasorahle, feasible c.,:-n.oaise; the final developrent plane, hc:rover, revcalc:'.
! exactly htxr di_'ficult it cull be to actually construct the project as ircnoacd and
! approved in concent, and indicated clearly the considerable environmental disturbance
which would result.,
i
i Hr. Luce recalled the eanlxxsr proposal by Kr. Victorsen included a five story
! apartment buildin,j on the :07th -lope of :he hill at 12 units per acre_ Ile noted
! that although tier staff w^ulci pr::fcr the ail-nultinle concent, the density would be
! unacc,ptable i%x;n an e^.vie•:nrzatinl point of view, iic recx.:.enaed .ratiad that
t variances be !ranted 110:tin7 C0ntt1`lCtion of a "series of r•.a11rr five story
j buildings, perhaps t1:o or throe, as closo to tha north lot 1`_nc as nocal'ble to
eliminate any 1,,p..c-, on t^e ct"ser sida OF the hill and iurtcer reduco ]i+e ovarall
environmental Dcca+se this solution could retain a .'renendcus ansunt of
open space, the davelcner s'r,ruld l:^ renuired to dadicrte that eaten ^:nee to the Cltv
of Edina to encu:•.^ its pres•_•rvatinn and disniss anv denand for future dcvelonrent.
He noted a life cst.ate cr sor..a ocher legal arrar.,,^,aacnt should be rar,ot ntcd with Dr.
and Mrs. 61enn Lc::ia, wio o:'n -he c;:inti..^.g hone at the top of the hill (6320 Gleason
Road) so the total site can eventually he cityc:rned.
Hr. Luce presented a letter dated Novc^her 25, 1974, from D. Jerry r1rhem—
6513 Navaho Trail, x11-61 GXnT33sed several routs of conr_rn of "annro::imately 20
very interested '.:ocr:os ncrs it the Cherol.ca Itilln :.rca" ra�rarding the r^rpocad
enhance of 1'ir.'criicw i. no ''a: a rart.cularly i?:+('r:ccs point an indi:in Hills
Pass". I!. added that ^est of t!!e en= -ants receivzd tae beer in connection with the
I single family part of the dcvalo,ncnt and not the nultiple family portion.
i
• ! Hr. rolke Victor -con clarified his earlier proposal, presented as an A rtory
apartrent butldir,^•, was 5 stcric:; a!'ove ground with 3 lcvcl3 of under;,sound par`.•inp•.
i He stated "if It is felt that that proposal is the wtv to po, we would IU:e to have
it before the Council at their nett rleeting". ter. Victorsen stated the final
% developnent plans ni+ow "no ch�rne front the concept an^roved in the nu:l!,er of lots or
units or anvthinr, crher tl= the :.:preach to the road; the Citv Cnr,inacr, didn't like
the 13: graze but Just raid ',hat can you do'.
" 11c stated "this is the. second time
I have gone to a Treat expense to try to aorkthis hill out", and ,etc:; ?to feels he
li should be compensated in sone way for those costs, perhaps by an increased density.
t Considerable discussion followed r•c.^,ardirp• the road trades and interrection,
i the church property. etc, !!r, r.=. -an, r•ecallinr: the r^rlier five rtor•.• r+ultf.nle
i- projoc: vas "a hn;!s monolith tic.t in rode had no relation to the rest of the areal',
stated he "h.c1 always thot-fit th,z :.n rlavt-ent huildirr• on the north •tide. ,f the
bill was the Le::t roJution if it wn be kept at a reasonable scale and density".
NO. C. Joh:a:oa a „evd.•
Hr. Jerry T.1:ber7.. 6`13 1!.:vaho frail. felt that "that hill, !con the stand-
point of puttin;! single17-.ilv_ ruzidzncns on thn south side, is virtually an
unhuildaAlc kind of site, rend t`:a: tend, wish 13: y+rs'cs aP•o•%a 7131inn till : Pass,
wauld he ir.cre_i:av p or n1 -r sir, .nd a -> .a:y 1..: mrd, fir. F.Ybc^,!. Hr. Iron aahlbe:%
(5521 i:a..O:o :1•ail), ;:av`d Fifrir (65:0gcvahn Tr:;il), and fir. iron Petersan
(6529 Ilavei,o Tr 7i1) ol;ea;cc w _ha Vrc;csc.1 pro -cat Inti m<prerscd conic..^•1 abua:
the grades and p, r.tdirg. s. _:v ler scl.00l chiI,-cn, aid cafe r. 1:c �ebile erd rnrr•
cc -icy vehicle s. Cr..,.c:• C!:rietrau(f n9 "irdi n Iiills Pals) ru-stic.led er.
victorsen's "e_cnonic i1r -:r _", :::. Bernie Gucd.•rzon (6110.• lr.�ian •"o:d C' role)
and Dr. Gicnn Levis Gt,7 ' lcasun Poad) indicated tit^y could sunpert awet-l-designed
in -scale rp rtu. r.t devcio-r,rn: at a r•:nsoa::but,
is drsion the rerth si'.c of the
bill, lcavi:•g the rest oc tl!a 11-11 untoochcd.
yr. 1.11ce toted thn rJ2 is opposed to the single family dcvnlep:.cnt on the
i
south aid* of the hill.
�. leen Ruty:.ir rrvcd 4:10 .r,ro %tv "propose a colutton which uttl:ccs the site
at • tarlr.vt o. C u•1it. :ra r. -.:j t`.•vt itzinoiul y c:n separate the huildini: rasr.
Into t1:o zc:.cntt: cc:t,01:a ::S:h c.1 u:•d.ut;.ocnd col,nectioa.to to :Louth fisc height.I•e
allottud to the building :• eta rav:d nort!:crly Oil'.h, Pronorty rcA,;co
Also. if rt all 1�^:::vl •. Cir row• 1 nLt.nld a::it c.t:o 11 coule/ Troll tat: • r than
Cleasoa I:uad. Thn of t'•tc hill r. i:`^;d bn aa:uircd h: dcdica,tu.• n.,d lry a
life entato rr rc:ae oth•:r ..1.v-1 far P:,:•Y Ind oprn spacu Pu (•ores."
Tolloving furtT•ar d.ncu•ta:en, C- 11t•,•,nn •:n^ot:de.l the rnticn. elae;f/i'r. the
r Plrunlinl; unit:-.iuu's action .ons not ccastitutr. a wncupt ap;.rovit hu: atl.0 the
d.4voltu,,:r to au'+nit a con•:•.nt r^q ori Lara on thun,r Isalianctars. All voted aye.
Kation carried. ,
. 1S
Mr. Luce noted Mr. Victorsen, the property owner and developer, is now
requesting approval of both a subdivision and the final development plans for
rezoning. He explained the four lot subdivision includes an exception parcel (Dr.
Glenn Lewis' lot at the top of the hill), a lot on Indian Hills Road (Mr. Victorsen's
house), a lot for the apartment building itself, and an outlot (the remainder of the
hill, -which would be dedicated to the City for open space purposes). Mr. Luce
presented a statistical data sheet and the final development plans for the proposed
apartment building. He recalled that after lengthy discussion at the April 7, 1975,
Council meeting, the Council granted concept approval for a 140 unit, five story
apartment building of Type 1 construction. Mr. Luce stated the final development
plans and the subdivision conform to that concept, and he would therefore recommend
approval contingent on the following: 1. that the landscape plan include an increase
in the amount of shrubbery on the south side of the building and the number of
deciduous trees on the north side of the building; 2. that a snow fence be constructed
S-75-14 Victorsen's Timbe_rview Addition. Generally located at the southwest
corner of the Crosstown Highway and Gleason Road.
AND
Z-74-7 Folke Victorsen. Generally located at the southwest corner of the
Crosstown Higir;my and Gleason Road. R-1 Single Family Residence
District to PRD -5 Planned Residential District. FINAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN APPROVAL.
on the perimeter of the area to be disturbed so that accidental destruction of
vegetation will not occur during construction; and 3. that outlot A be dedicated
to the City of Edina for open space purposes. Mr. Luce stated that Mr. Victorsen
has agreed to those contingencies.
Mr. Kremer asked whether provision has been made for access to the Lewis
house on the top of the hill. Mr. Luce explained a private driveway easement
crosses the property and approval of the subdivision and dedication of the outlot
will not affect the status of that private easement.
In reply to Mr. Hughes, Mr. Larsen, the architect, stated that the unit sizes
will range from 900 square feet for the one bedroom units to 1500 square feet for
the two bedroom and den units. The rents will range from $350/month for the one
bedroom units to $650-700/month for the three bedroom units.
Mr. Lee Huetmaker, 6429 Margaret's Lane, representing the Arrowhead Lake
Association, stated he has concluded that an apartment building is probably the
best use for the site but that the size of the property and the taxes warrant an
80-100 unit building rather than a 140 unit building. Further, the proposed
building is seven stories exposed, five stories of living units over two garage
levels, and the Council specifically approved a five story building, not a seven
story building. Mr. Luce responded that the Council was in favor of Type 1
construction and approved a five story building above a two story garage. Mr•
Arnold Schaefer of Cross View Lutheran Church stated he, too, was at the City
Council meeting, and his recollection is also that a five story building was
approved, not a seven story building. Mr. Luce stated the questions of land use,
density, traffic, height, etc. were discussed by the Council and approved as part
of the concept approval.
Following additional discussion, a motion to approve the subdivision and
final development plans for the Timberview project was made by Mr. G. Johnson and
seconded by Mr. C. Johnson. All voted aye. Motion carried.
1
i
• r
FOLKS VICTOR_SF'`: PPD -5 7.f1N1`: Rr�11 .ST FnZ "TIIF. Tl`f':�RS" CONTIN TO ?t1FC11 17r
Alfidavits n[
-j.,mice were presenra•j by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered
placed on file. Mr. Luce presented the pet -tion of Mr. Folke Victorser• for --on-
Ing change Iron R-1 Resiurntial District to FGD -5 Residential District and Concept
approval for "The Timters" located generally on the Southwest corner of Gleason
Road and the Cross•own High- iy. He recalled that the last time Council had
considered zoning for this property, concept plan approval had been granted for
a number of apartment units at the base of the hill witij sone single family
develop.ent on the upper prirtion ui the hill. Mr. Luce recalled that extreme
neighborhood opposition had developed, that the Environmental Quality Commission
Jr• { 2124j75
had felt that the fill that would have to be placed In the valleys would be extreme,
and that the Fire Department had felt that the grades would be too steep for its
emergency vehicles. Mr. Luce added that, in reviewini; final develep:cent plan:;, the
Planning Cemmissiun, whiie not actually denying the plan, had encouraged Mr. Viet-
orsen to try to develop the Site in a dif_`er�nt manner. :Ir. Luce said that the
Planning Commission had acknowledged that the lots on the lake were extremely
valuable property and thIt, in asking that the property be given up, had recog-
nized that higher overall density would have to be permitted on the site. Mr. Luce
then presented Mar. Victorsen's revised plan and a graphic of the site of approximately
twenty acres which showed a four, five and six story building containing 160 units
with the mass of the building fitting into a ravine so that the top of the building
would net extend above the height of the hill, and with eight units per acre.
Council was reminded that the S:estern Edina Plan calls for four units per acre. Mr.
Folke Viccorscn, 6440 Indian Hills Pass, said that this is the first time he has
' had the approval of the Environmental Quality Commission and of the Planning Com -
had thn. He introduced his architect, Mr. Larson, who showed n model of the pro-
mission.
n. He development and responded to questions from the audience on the amenities
of the development. Mr. Larson said that it is anticipated that the apartLcnts
will be occupied by older residents and that the building, would only be visible
from the Crossto%,m flirhway and that, even there, it.would be substantially screened
by trees that are growing at the edge of the site. Objecting to the proposal on
the grounds that it is a substantial departure from the four units per acre recom-
mended in the Western Edina Plan, that it would bring too nany cars into , school
area, that it is not in character with the neighborhood and that the hill should
remain as open space were Dr. Lawrence Gold, 6610 Gleason Road, Messrs. Bernard
Gunderson, 6405 Indian Pond Circle, Gerald Ekberg, 6513 Navaho Trail, Kent Calhoun,
6617 Gleason Road, F. S. Webster, 6409 McCauley Circle, Dick Scaberg, President
of the Viking Hills Association and Mrs. Ann Carrier, 6409 Indian fond Circle.
They contended that the building really has the elevation of an eight story
structure. Mr. Haugen submitted a petition which he said contained 163 signatures
opposing concept approval and the zoning change of the property, based primarily
on "the height and population density of the proposed structure". In response to
a question of Mayor Van Valkenburg, :Ir. Erickson said that the PRD Ordinance does
en space and requires that it be controlled by scenic
require a certain amount of op
casements, parkland dedications or a homeowners' association ownership, but that
the property in question does meet all ordinance requirements. In reply to a'
question of Mr. Darrell Boyd, 7204 Shannon Drive, Mr. Luce said that, assuming the
proposal is approved, the City would probably request Mi. Victorsen to provide
access from McCauley Trail to Gleason Road. Mr. Victorsen told Mrs. Ann Overholt
that he had approached the church twice to buy some of their land and had not been
able to reach an agreement with them. Mr. Victorsen said that it would not be
economically feasible to follow the suggestion of Dr. Glen Lewis, 6328 Cleason Road,
i that the plan be changed to eliminate the fifth and sixth floors, reducing the
building to four stories of living space. Mr. Luce recalled that studies show that
t fewer trips per day are generated from multiple family units than from sin..^,le
B
family development. Reference was made to a letter from ,It. and Mrs. arry
Tlurphy, Jr., 6506 Indian Hills Road, supporting Hr. Viccorsen's proposal. In
response to a question of Mayor Van Val:;cnburg. Mr. Rosland said that the site
under discussion is not on the final list of land rccorsnerded by the Open :race
Committee because there is a park already across the street. Mayor Van Valkenburg
said that, while he recognized the rationale of the Planning Com ssion trade-off
of eight units per acre for the preservation of the hill, he was concerned that
eight units was a great increase over the recocmendation of the t:astarn Edina Plan.
Councilman Courtney said that he believed that Mr. Victorsen had submitted many
plans for this property over the years and that he could never please all of the
neighbors. lie recalled that when the b:estern Edina Plaa was accepted, it was a
"plan." only and that, while he had never before voted in favor of a high rise
apartment, lie believed that Mr. Victorscn had a right to develop his property. He
then moved that the concept be accepted as reeo,.Lnended by the Planning Cu:_nission.
Councilwoman Schmidt said that she believed that, because land develop -lent has
such an impact on the quality of their lives, the citizens of an arca should have
a voice in chose decisions. Councilman Richards suggested that the density be
reduced to 41s or 5 units per acre with three livable stories and one story of park -
Ing. Councilman Shaw indicated that he would accept four to six units per acre
along the line of the Planning Commission recoruuendation, Councilman Courtncy'fs'
motion died for the lack of a second. Councilwoman Schmidt Is motion vas then
seconded by Counci'_man Shaw and carried, that the matter be continued to arrch 17,
1975. to see if Mr. Victorsen can bring a new proposal with a lesser density to the
Council. Mr. Victorsen told Council that he could not come out financially with
the reduction proposed ill the size of the build:.ng.
(D
O
GO
M
W
W
pl1BT.IC 11E1.RT!:f C': rm,nSt:f) ?n!:T!:G C!!N :GF. E01 KF VTCTORSF!;1 Cn!,*TT!_t1F') TO APRIT. 7.
3 1975.
Mr. Luce recalled tie Victorsen matter was continued iro the March ,
uncil meeting so the developer could see•c other development alternatives.
Co
Coexplained four concepts which have since been submitted: Concept Scheme A
lieinvolves 33 single family lots, four of which would be developed in the future
3/17/75
in connection with the church property; Concept Scheme B(1), which previously
received concept anproval fro^ the Planning COT.mission and Council, includes
a 74 unit apartment building and 20 single family lots with access from
except
Indian llills Road; Concept Scheme B is similar [o Concept Scheme B(1)
that it includes t1:e four future single family lots to be developed in con-
nection with the church property and has access to the other 20 single family
lots from Gleason Poad, rather than Indian Hills road; Concept Sche:r.e C for
a 140 unit apartment building. proposed a concept at 7 units per acre similar
to a concept at 8� units per acre recently approved by the E M and Planning
Commission but held over by the Council on :'arch 3. Mr. Luce outlined the
major advantages and disadvancaces of al. lie noted that schemes
each propos
sed by the developger.t Of
A, B, and B(1) would result in extreme grades cau
the single family lots, a subsequent safety hazard due to those
a road to service
and topography of the site,
extreme grades. and dehradation of the vcFetation
whereas Scheme C would preserve alTost the total hill and minimize the site
impact of both the building, height and parking lot. Mr. Victorsen and ,It.
the architect, detailed the various plans with graphics showing
Dick Larson,
ncep r alternative. The alternative development
the advantages of each co
proposals were discussed at lenr.t;�. Mr. Arnold Schaefer. andrannouncedr.he
Cross View Lutheran Church; felt there ista better way",nd and a members has
that a meeting, with Van an Valkenburg,
been scheduled for March 22, 1975. ?!r. Victorsen
nago, andoted thenfeclsdthat
appraisals of the church property were made a year ago,ans. Mayor Van that
the church has had ample time to propose any gasto
Sur the meeting with the church be held as scheduled so as questioned
entire set of facts. Mr. Orrin Haugen, 6612 Indian Hills Road, q
the rezoning procedure to dace and the alleged acreage, and maintained that
4.7 or 4.8 units per acre would be more appropriate than the 7 units per acre
proposed in Concept C. *lr. Erickson replied the rezoning process is being_,
followed correctly and appropriately, and an accurate boundary survey is
required prior to iinal development plan approval. Councilman Richards agreed
with Mr. Schaefer that "a better plan is yet to come, inasmuch as three plans
are undesirable from ti standpoint of trades and other g estsuistes theabestated
plan
by Mr. Luce, and the fourth plan, which :tr. Victorsen suggests
ve plan pro;osed
for the City, is far greater in density than the comprehensi
for this area would allow". Councilman Shaw indicated he would prefer the
proposal of 140 units, which concentrates the dwelling and dwelling units in
one location and provides the greatest amount of open space and preservacioll
and
of the vegetation and tonography. Mrs. Alison Fuhr, 6609 Brittany ro•
Dr. Roger Christgau, 6501 Indian Hills Pass, agreed with Councilman Shaw.
Following additional discussion, Councilman Shaw moved that the alternative
for a 140 unit multiple residential structure (Concept SchemC) e approved
Councilman Courtney seconded the motion. mr. Victorsen
by the Council.
"tile church has had plenty
of time to determine the use their
commented thatSchaefer remarked "that, the circumstances. the ayor
property
and City Manager could work better with the church". 11r. Victorsen then agreed
to postpone a decision on the rezoningmatter the next Councill 71 meeting.
e tiCouneilman
Councilman Shaw cvoved to continue
tile Courtney seconded the motion. ;lotion carried. •T' -
t
i
i
t
_ f
IIINurEs OF TOE Rral.A.R :tl:I:TI\G OF THE
r.01AA CITY COUNCII, 11LLn yr CITY HALL ON
AI'RIL 7, 1975
Answering rollcall were meabers Richards, Shaw, Schmidt and Hnyur Van Valkan:urg.
lil%UTLS of February 24, M.treh 3 anJ March 10, 1975, were approvcJ as submitted by
motion of Councl.lwom-an Schmidt, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
Lot 20, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196, except highway.
Lot 21, Auditor's SuLJlvlslon No. 196, c;:ccpt that part lying Easterly and
Southerly of the folluuing dcnerih_d line: eom"Zilcin,^, at tie Northeast
corner of Lot 7, aleck 1, lr.:l•n hills, thence North 5 degrees, 05 minutes
East 131 feet, thence North 34 degrces, 13 minutca, hest 101 35/100 feet,
thence Korth 0 de:trees, 3 minutes 30 seconds East 114 2/10 feet, thence
North 65 degrees, 45 ninutcs, 30 seconds East to the West line of lot l8
and there terminating. Easterly o[ a
Lot A. Indian Hills, except that part of said Lot A lying
straight line from the must NOrthcrly corner of said lot to a point In the
Southeasterly line thereof distant twenty-five (25) feet Southwosterly from
the most Easterly corner of said Lot A. according to the plat of Indian
Hills on file ar.J of record in the office of the Registrar of DccJs in and
for said county and state (which is 1n Sub -District I'RD-5)
Ration was seconded by Cnuncilwo;ran Schmidt and on rollcall there were three ayes
with Councilman Hicharda vuting "14'Y" and the motion carried. Ur. Clcn Lewis,
6328 Gleason Road, paid that ho believed that this action is a rrasonablo comprom-
ise and thanked the Council for their many hours of deliberation.
0rPl'.'A':CF._NO. 811-:55 CR\:TE'li FTI"! R'_'.\DINC; FnI.RE VICT01:'.F.\ (TIIE TIY.Ar,tS)
Luce reeali�.: :290t We pt'opasals of ltr.
of Uw ed
Tolkc Vic co r: en [or the 'r}.0 -i zo�tn and prclirinary ap;roval propo
t
devclopr..cnt of 'The Timbers on property generally located en the Southwest corner
1
O:ay had been continued from lWrch 11, 1975,
f Gleason Road and the Crosstown 111r,
to see if there was any chance -of aeyuiria, acditional land from the Cross 1'Se•.+
konburg advised that he h.td attended a mectin;; wit!.
Lutheran Church. Mayor Jan Val.
)Jr. Hyde .^.nd representatives of the church and that Xr. Victorsen had considered
the price asked by the church to be uneconomic for his development. M.lyor Van
Valkenburg said that the Open Space Committee had also felt that the price for
the property was out of line. Mayor Van Valkenburg said that he opposed tl:e idea
of R -I development for the property in question because he believed that such
development would cause the ultimate destruction of the hill and because of the
safety factors involved. He said that he would favor approval of the proposed
140 unit apartment on the North side of the hill which proposal he eonsi-'cred an
improvement over the ori,;inal proposal for a combination of sin;le fa^fly dwell -
In response to a sugrestlon of Councilman Sich-
Ings and an apart[ mt building. p
CQ
" W
arils that the building contain one, rather than two, floors of packing so as to
W
reduce the height of the building, lir. Luce said that this could be studied at
the time of final development consideration, but that it is important that there
are adequate parkin; facilities on the site. Councilman Richards also raised
the question of the 5:: cash dedication and the dedication of 15 acres for park-
land as had been recommended by the Park Board. lir. Luce said that this is the
zoning hearing only and that the parkland dedication would be considered at the
time the subdivision of the property is submitted to Council. Nr. Erickson
added that this hearing is for preliminary (or concept) approval only and that
the Planning Commission must under ordinance• consider the details of the build-
t-,
(
ing when the proposal is submitted for final approval. Councilman Richards
.
objected that the proposal exceeds seven units per acre when the cenprehensive
i
plan calls for no more than four units per acre. He added that there seems to
_
be confusion as to the e::act size of the property. City Attorrcy Erickson
pointed out that a boundary survey would be submitted at the tine the proposal
is brought back for final approval. Coencilwo-ar. Schmidt said that the Planner
should work to prevent any possible traffic problems in the area and to see that
the building fits into the hill as closely as possible. Follovin, considerable
"
discussion, Councilman Shaw moved preliminary approval and offered Ordinance No.
811-A55 for First Reading, with the understanding that the building be coniruct—
•
as far to the North as possible• that cash and parkland dedication be made in
conformance with ordinance requirements, and further, with the understanding
thit no further construction be permitted on the property:
ORDINANCE NO. 811-A55
'
Ar ORDI\ASCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINACE (NO. 811)
BY AODTNt: CO THE PLAN':th aSS171_::T'_AL DT.ST-tICT (PRD -5)
'
THE CITY COUNCIL OF Ti Z CI1Y OF
'
Section 1. paragraph 4 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is
"
enlarged by adding the following thereto:
'The extent of the Planned Residential District (Sub -District PRD -5) is
enlarged by the addition of the fallowing property:
Lots 18, 19 and 21, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196, coeaer.cing at the Sor[ho:.
corner of lot 7, Block 1, Indian Hills, thence North 5 degrees, 05 minutes
}
East 131 feet to the actual point of beginning, thence Ncrth 34 degrees, 1:>
i
minutes, W 101 35/100 feet, thence North 0 degrees. 13 ninutcs, 30 seconds
East 114 2/10 feet, thence North 65 degrees, 45 minutes, 30 seconds East
141 7/10 feet, thence South 34 degrees. 41 minuses, 30 seconds Last 16S 15/1.
feet, thence South 5 degrees, 39 minutes, East 100 feet, thence South 84
degrees, 06 minutes test 173 7/10 feet to the beginning.
Lots 18 and 19, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196, except tormenting at the !:or,-
oreeast
eastcorner of Lot 7, Block 1, Indian hills, thence North 5 degrees 05 nine:
East 131 feet to the actual point of beginning, thence North 34 degrees,
13 minutes hest 101 35/100 feet, thence Korth 0 degrees, 13 minutes, 30
i
seconds East 114 2/10 ivoc. thence North 65 degrees, 45 minutes. 30 second;
East 141 7/10 feet, thence south 34 dcc-!;rccs, 41 minutes. 30 seconds East
168 15/100 fcct, thence South 5 degrees. 39 minutes oast IOU icct, thence.
South 84 degrees, 06 minutes West 178 7/10 feet to beginning.
Lot 20, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196, except highway.
Lot 21, Auditor's SuLJlvlslon No. 196, c;:ccpt that part lying Easterly and
Southerly of the folluuing dcnerih_d line: eom"Zilcin,^, at tie Northeast
corner of Lot 7, aleck 1, lr.:l•n hills, thence North 5 degrees, 05 minutes
East 131 feet, thence North 34 degrces, 13 minutca, hest 101 35/100 feet,
thence Korth 0 de:trees, 3 minutes 30 seconds East 114 2/10 feet, thence
North 65 degrees, 45 ninutcs, 30 seconds East to the West line of lot l8
and there terminating. Easterly o[ a
Lot A. Indian Hills, except that part of said Lot A lying
straight line from the must NOrthcrly corner of said lot to a point In the
Southeasterly line thereof distant twenty-five (25) feet Southwosterly from
the most Easterly corner of said Lot A. according to the plat of Indian
Hills on file ar.J of record in the office of the Registrar of DccJs in and
for said county and state (which is 1n Sub -District I'RD-5)
Ration was seconded by Cnuncilwo;ran Schmidt and on rollcall there were three ayes
with Councilman Hicharda vuting "14'Y" and the motion carried. Ur. Clcn Lewis,
6328 Gleason Road, paid that ho believed that this action is a rrasonablo comprom-
ise and thanked the Council for their many hours of deliberation.
ORDINA::CF NO_611-ASS f.R.\':'ED �ECO�tti RF -!_':G. Mr. Luce presented the request of
:fir.—folke Yicton:un for✓ -S xonin� for thu Souchvcsc corner of the crosstown
Figl,way and Gleason Road for Second Reading, subject to the following canting -
enc
1. Thnt an increase in the amount of shrubbery on the south side of the building
sod an increase in the nunber of deciduous tt'ces on the :North side of tha build-
ing be included in the landscape plan;
2. Thata sno•-a fence be constructed on the perimeter of the area so that Scot►
dental destruction of ve^,tation will not occur;
3. That the proponent deai-cafe outlot A for park purposes.
Mr. Orrin I:augrn, 6612 Indian ilills Road, said that he recalled that Council had
approved four stories of apartment units and t•,, levels of parkirg above
the a1C0(i1Jde at
� of April 7, 1915. l:r. Luce recalled that the eriainal proposal for
six stories of apartments over two lel,:Is of parkins had been t iductaug^nfive
ob)ceted
stories (and 140 aoarcment units) over two levels of na Plan and said that the tact
parking.
that the proposal docs not conform to the Western Edin
that Mr. Ytctorsen misrepresented the size of the site to be over twenty acres,
rather than 18.6 actual acres, reflects a 'lack of candor on the part of the
developer". Hesui•,,es:cd thet the density be reduced to seven units per acre w:)ich
wouldMr.
1 plicationtthatt he`ts hadcpurposelytmtarepresentedithe rsizeSofdhis aproperty. t he �)`HO ed the
6/2/75
that be had just compared his ori,g.1nal survey with a recent survey and four`
to ti
"
said
that he had lost a considerable amount of land when Clcason Road was moved
lir. Richards recalled
West at the time the Crosstown Hli:hxay vas constructed.
Mr. Luce had been directed eP
that at the time First Reading had been granted,
by the elimination of some P`_
'
if the building could be lowered by one story
levo! of parking would mean
Eng spaces. Nr. Luce said that elimination of one
would be required and that chat
that an additional number of off-street spaces
ago a study made by ;
would be highly undesirable. He roca)led that a few years
required for each apartment unit, but r
City had indicated that two stalls were
1.25 enclo::ed and 0.75 outside stalls
requirement had now been reduced so chat
for :.partment unit. Councilran Richards then question_
ire now recommended each
of park land as well as cash, and was to.
'
the precedence of requiring dedication
required. Councilcan Courtney thereupon offered
that this was not normally
No. 811-A55 for Second Reading, as recor..•aenecd by the Planning Comniss_.
Ordinance
subject to approval of the plat, and moved its adoption as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. SLI -A55
811)
AN ORDINANCE A.-r-ND'1NG T(E ZONING ORDIINZCE (N0.
(PR
BY ADDING To T:i'r, PLA';NFi) --_RESIDZ:ZTL1L DISTINCTD-5)
-THE CITY COUNCIL OF .: CITY' OF i:D IS:\, :II X:OTa, O:tDAINS:
811 of the City is
Section 1. Paragraph 4 of Section 5 of Ordinance No.
enlarged by adding the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residential District (Sub -District PRD -5) is
tG
enlarged by the addition of tt,e following property:
No. 196, commencing at the North-
Lots 18, 19 and 21, Auditor's Subdivision
Hills, thence Notch 5 degrees, OS
`»
east corner of Lot 7, Block 1, Indian
actual point of beginning, thence North
minutes East 131 feet to the
W 101 351100 feet, thence North 0 degrees, 13
` W
34 degrees, 13 minutes,
114 2/10 feet, thence North 65 degrees, 45 minutes.
minutes, 30 seconds East
141 7/10 feet, thence South 34 decrees, 41 minutes, 30 sect:
30 seconds Fast
East 168 15/100 feet, thence South 5 degrees, 39 minutes, Ea:t 100 feet,
beginning.
thence South 84 degrees, 06 minutes West 178 7/10 feet to the
at the
Lots 18 and 19, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196, except commencing
!is, North 5 degrees
•
corner of Lot 7, Block 1, Indian Hi l thence
beginning, thence :North
'
05 minutes East 131 feet to the actual point of
101 35/100 feet, thence :North 0 dc;rees, 13
34 degrees, 13 minutes West minutes
114 210 feet, thence Notch 65 grecs, 45
/
minutes, 30 seconds East
41
141 7/10 feet, thence South 34 dig`Ses39mfnutesC4asc0
"
30 seconds Fast es 100
seconds East 168 15/100 feet, thence South 5 deg
beginning.
'
feet, thence South 84 degrees, 06 minutes West 178 7/10 feet to
t
Lot 20, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196, except highway.
lying Easterly and
Lot 21, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196, except that pare
the Northeast
Southerly of the following described line: coe-aenetng at
North 5 degrees, 05 minutes
corner of Lot 7, Block 1, Indian Gills, thence
West 35/100 feet,
'
East 131 feet, thence !North 34 decrees, 13 minutes,
0 f
114 2/10 feet, thence
thence North 0 degrees, 3 minutes 30 seconds East
West line of Lot 18
!torch 65 degrees. 45 minutes, 30 seconds lase to the
•
ind there terminating.
Lot A lying Easterly of a
Lot A, Indian Hills, except that part of said
lot to a point in the
straight line from the most Northerly corner of said
(25) feet Sovt`vesterly frc-
Southeasterly line thereof distant twenty-five
the Plat of Indian
the most Easterly corner of said Loc A. accordin¢ to
the Registrar of Deeds in and
•
Hills on file and of record in the office of
(which is In Sub -District PRD -5)."
!
''for said county and state
be in full force and effect upon its passage
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall
and publication.
the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Shaw and on rol'
Notion for adoption of
four with Councilman Richards voting "Nay% based on his
•
y
4
tall there were ayes
1,lief that Mr. victorsen's proposal is too dense,t r this ➢drtic tar tract of
land, and the ordinance was adopted.j�j�
t i
ATTEST: Mayor
•
/
e e PIZ-3 �Ji I LIfi- ,t_
,
t
City Clerk
T
I
Subdivision No. 5-1-7-0
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NA. -,E: ( C%
LAND SI ZE :�'L I LAND VALUE:
(By:Date.
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ On.F°, as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Laird Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
j—j1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
(� beneficially expands the park.
El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
}—�3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If.property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
�5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
G.
B. Cash Required
0 1. In all other instances than above.
E 2.
LOCATRON MAP-
-4
I N7ERLACHE
N
I,g4T OMAN �
' 1 L_ �-
b��-- I
ui
M•ER.�_�EM °
i
1 _
HAROLD ,'N000S
.. a ;'' y,� ;`{;•
i
COUNTRY
s-i'vLAbdv1s),ision
REQUEST NUMBER:
S-77-23 Taft Addition
LOCATION: Tots 35 & 36, Aud. Sub. 325
W. of Blake Rd. & Scriver Rd. extended
REQUEST: —Four lot single fami 1 y nl at
23.���+�" t�jEtnninH i�ettiL1L?.ts.ilt V111 of S.I;D1!
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 2, 1977
S-77-23 Taft Addition. Generally located west of Blake Road and Scriver
Road extended.
Refer to: Attached preliminary plat and parkland dedication report.
The subject property is a 4.5 acre tract of land located west of Scriver Road
and south of Blake Road. An existing house is located on the northerly
portion of the property and gains access by way of Blake Road.
The proposed preliminary plat indicates a five lot single family subdivision.
A 12 acre lot would be retained for the existing structure on the northerly
portion of the site. Four new lots would be created which would range in
size from 19,000 square feet to 52,000 square feet. Access to these lots would
be provided by the westerly extension of Scriver Road. The proposed plat also
indicates the provision of an open space and drainage easement around the small
pond on the southerly portion of the property. The Planning Commission may
recall several preliminary plans which were prepared by the Planning Department
in 1973 for the Blake -Schaefer Road area of the City. Although these plans
were not officially adopted, staff has referred to them in its review of this
proposed subdivision. The Blake -Schaefer plans proposed the westerly extension
of Scriver Road to serve the subject property as well as properties further
west. The alignment of Scriver Road as shown on the proposed plat is generally
in conformance with the Blake -Schaefer plans. It should be noted that the
further westerly extension of Scriver Road to serve additional properties should
be anticipated.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision in that:
1) the single family residential development proposed is compatible
with surrounding developments.
2) proposed lot sizes are generally similar to lot sizes on Scriver Rd.
3) the subdivision and road alignment are in conformance with the
unofficial Blake -Schaefer plans.
4) provision of an open space and drainage easement should protect
the natural character of the pond on the site.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1) submission of an executed drainage and open space easement.
2) an executed developer's agreement.
CH:k
10/26/77
c
�a
' I L•1 7I7
I '0
G
Q
Oco
C7
tj
CD
N '. -
st It
V4
Z
H
O `G
'J C'C'1 O
,O 1•C'1 V'1 D
00 n• O O
/
_
n
--i
O% rr 0)W
N
V
Ct1
O O
Of
Z
00 CD C1
W T
W W CD _
W
=TW
pt �
pt
-'.1
C
su
d
= r
N C1
CD L
-<
C
CD 0
O CA
'C v. cQ'
�. d Ko
•� V'1 .Z7
? A
O
-+
� W
=
0 7} QO Z CD
dV1
O W C1 CD
O
,o �'
Z C
=3
cn
CD co
co a
co
Cq�_.
c
�a
' I L•1 7I7
I '0
G
Q
Oco
C7
tj
CD
c
�a
' I L•1 7I7
I '0
G
V
0
O
CD
CL
Q
Oco
C7
CD
N '. -
�G
Z
H
O `G
'J C'C'1 O
,O 1•C'1 V'1 D
00 n• O O
_
n
--i
O% rr 0)W
N
V
Ct1
O O
Z
00 CD C1
W T
W W CD _
W
=TW
pt �
pt
-'.1
C
su
d
= r
N C1
CD L
-<
C
CD 0
O CA
'C v. cQ'
�. d Ko
•� V'1 .Z7
? A
O
-+
� W
=
0 7} QO Z CD
dV1
O W C1 CD
O
,o �'
Z C
=3
cn
CD co
co a
co
Cq�_.
f7 a
co
c ON
CL
a, G
n
V
to
cu
-ucod
y d
O
C
CD
=3
rn
< Ca.
O
CD
'^ N
co
z
C co
n o
c'
'^
<
o
CD
C)
-n
C
W_arno
t
W <
m
CD Co
cu
C
d 2i:
<
N
A
co ca
I
O
CD
o
`'
N tA C
d
d
D
t�
�
l0 CD
1
Q
�
^Z
• I
V
0
O
CD
CL
Subdivision No. G•1--7 7- ,'_-'j
SUBDIVISION DGDICF+TION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NA1.1E:
LAND SIZE:.� l►��� LAND VA LU�ED :C,
fC
(By: i`--� �-r.; , Date:
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
9 A. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate of the land
as a fee in lieu of land
EK C. donate $
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
land dedicated)
D 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
II 2. If property is 6 aeras or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
E3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for stcrm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
n 6.
B. Cash Required
MI. In all other instances than above.
2.
0
I
u
t
cr '� r
J
- VAI . --0t
A
E �V
FiE1GtiT� '
NI LICIR
66 Tti T
A
T
w
Ims
NORMAN-
DALE ,
�. PARK
su-lbdi-%viE�)i0jnl
Brookview Heights 5th Addition
REQUEST NUMBER: S..:
7-21
LOCATION: E. of Cahill Rd. & 9 Mile Creek
W. of M.N. & S K.R. tracks & N of W. th
REQUEST: 18 lot single family plat
Ij Inge , rn(tiuj situ r jjCn1 Yilk Cof P,lina
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 2, 1977
S-77-21 Brookview Heights 5th Addition. C. Jacobson. Generally
located east of Cahill Rd. and 9 Mile Creek, west of the
M.N. & S. Railroad tracks and north of W. 70th Street (an
extension of Limerick Lane).
Refer to: Attached preliminary plat, grading plan, and
parkland dedication report.
The subject property is a 13 acre tract of land located between the M.N.S.
Railroad tracks and Nine Mile Creek immediately south of W. 66th Street.
An 18 lot single family subdivision is proposed which would be served
by the southerly extension of Limerick Drive. The average lot size for
the subdivision would be 18,700 square feet which is somewhat larger than
existing single family lots located easterly and westerly of the subject
property.
Nearly one half of the subject property lies within the flood plain of
Nine Mile Creek. The proponent has submitted a grading plan for the site
which has been reviewed by staff and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
The Watershed District has indicated that the proposed grading plan complies
with its rules and regulations in that a flood plain encroachment of less
than 20% is proposed. The remaining flood plain lands have been designated
as Outlot A which measures 3.93 acres. The proponent has indicated his
intent to dedicate this outlot to the City. A 200 foot wide strip of
land abutting the west side of the subject property and bisected by Nine
Mile Creek was dedicated to the City in conjunction with a previous
subdivision.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision
and flood plain permit in that:
1) the proposed land use is in conformance with the
Western Edina Plan.
2) lot sizes are generally consistent and somewhat
larger than surrounding subdivisions.
3) proposed flood plain encroachment is within standards
of the City and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1) a deed to the City of Edina for Outlot A.
2) adequate erosion control measures to prevent sediments
resulting from site grading from entering the flood plain
lands and Nine Mile Creek.
3) those items contained in the attached preliminary
engineering report.
10 26/77
;T!
Qj
ALJ
OUTLOT I w'.-4
171, Z30 so f'T
3.93 OGRES ',4L. �
LLJ
` t ,
'• � 11
r.�
i
4
i
u
10
Subdivision No. S-77-21
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION RI.PORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: �t�2^II�Cr�-►C�,� -
LAND SIZE:
LAND VALUE:
(By: Date: )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
n
B. dedicate _% of the land
C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
f 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
n 6.
B. Cash Required
El1. In all other instances than above.
11 2.
•.
0ADJ
W
a
YORKTOWN
W.
P, - �&G) { �4-qt
OtiYN,
.PHKI
PARK _
Y
a
0
r
F
{ ;TH.
REQUEST NII-MBER :
E. of York Ave, W. of Xerxes, N
LOCATION W. 76th St. & S. of W. 74 th St.
REQUEST: One lot plat and zoning for an
80 unit: apartment project
Ryan Construction First Addition
v3(i"Ozc�rjRnrrii�f_t2tIr1111LS1Lvitlnnc of c�iina
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 2, 1977
Z-77-17 Ryan Construction Co. Generally located E. of York Ave., W. of
Xerxes Ave., N. of W. 76th Street and S. of W. 74th St. extended.
R-1 Single Family District to Planned Residential District PRD -3.
Refer to: Attached preliminary zoning plans
On September 28, 1977, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan which was subsequently approved by the City Council on
October 17, 1977. The Planning Commission will recall that a 9.5 acre site
lying east of York Avenue and north of 76th Street and within the redevelopment
plan area was proposed for the construction of 80 low and moderate income
family townhouses. This project, which is proposed by Ryan Construction
Company, was discussed briefly on September 28, 1977.
Presently, Ryan Construction Company is requesting preliminary rezoning
approval from R -I to PRD -3, Planned Residential District. If approved by the
Planning Commission and Council, the proponents will then return with final
development plans for your review.
The proposed development plans call for 80 units which include 8 one bedroom
units, 48 two bedroom units, 20 three bedroom units, and 4 four bedroom units.
Structures and parking areas comprise 33.3% of the site with the remainder
devoted to open space areas, which include pedestrian walkways, tot lots,
and landscape areas. Access to the southern portion of the development is
provided from 76th Street and access to the northern portion from York Avenue.
100 enclosed garage spaces and 80 surface parking spaces are provided.
The subject property has been graded and altered significantly during past years.
Thus, few trees and green areas are present. The property is characterized by
fairly level topography, however, a rather steep embarkment is present along
York Terrace in the northwestern partion of the subject property.
Recommendation: Although the proposed development will be constructed for
housing for low and moderate income families, it must be emphasized that this
is not "low cost" housing, i.e., housing which is constructed to lesser design
and construction standards and with fewer amenities. Rather, the proposed
housing is designed and constructed in the same manner as a market rate housing
with similar amenities and should be reviewed by the Planning Commission in the
same manner as a market rate housing development.
Staff recommends preliminary zoning approval in that:
1. the proposal conforms with the South Edina Plan.
2. the proposal conforms with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan.
3. the low density development as proposed is desirable to
further reduce traffic impacts, to provide a less congested living
environment for low and moderate income families, and to provide a
suitable transition from low density developments to the east.
Ryan Construction Co.
Page 2
November 2, 1977
Recommendation:
4. building locations as proposed prevent an undesirable "row
house" appearance and provide areas for adequate screening with land-
scaping.
S. the proposal provides a unit mixture which provides housing
opportunities to a diversity of family sizes.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications in
conjunction with final plan approval:
1. dedication of an easement abutting York Terrace for roadway
purposes.
2. deletion of the northerly driveway on York Avenue.
3. completion of preliminary and final platting of the subject
property.
4. provision of an adequate landscape plan
Lastly, City Ordinances require that individual sewer and water connections must
be provided for townhouse developments. According to HUD and the Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency agreements which the proponent must enter into, the
proposed development must be used as rental property to low and moderate income
families for at least 30 years. Staff believes that no useful purpose would
be served by requiring individual sewer and water services at this time.
Therefore, staff recommends that the provisions requiring individual sewer and water
connections be waived with the condition that such individual services must be
installed in the event that any of the units of the proposed development are
offered for individual ownership.
GH:ks
10/28/77
Subdivision No. 22--7-7-?2
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
I l
SUBDIVISION NAME:
p>O Air -Mex vv� �
LAND SIZE: '.% 5�a�- LAND VALUE:
(BY:
Date: )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
0 A. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
land dedicated)
1'. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
E3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
r75. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
n 6.
B. Cash Required
W1. In all other instances than above.
El 2.
�I`II�'I�;QST;y OF rrOTA Continuing Education for Women
Cont_nuing Edkation and Extension
Fall Quarter, 1977 200 blesbrook Ea -11
CLA ;T S O?.'1=17) ATI b1`11A vi : IG:I C0.', u:.;ITY CE3417i:R
Courses listed below wI ll be cffcred this fall at the Edina Senior Consnunity
Center, 7151 York Avenue Sough.
A Minnesota law enables students 62 and over to enroll in credit and noncredit
classes at no cost on a space available basis. All students are responsible for
special and material fees. Students of all agos are welcome.
Detailed course descriptions are available upon request by calling 373-9743 or
writing to Continuing Education for T,,Tomen, 200 t•Tesbrook hall, 77 Pleasant St. S.E.,
University of Minnesota, ITinneapolis, ",'^T 55455.
Assertiveness Training $25 (6 sessions) Jan Taylor
C,Tednesdays, October 5 - November 9, 10:00 - 11:30
Camera $30 (8 sessions) Mary Strother
Mondays, October 3 - november 21, 10:30 - 12:00
Genealogy $15 (4 sessions) Donal Nelson
Fridays, October 7 - October 28, 10:00 - 11:30
Inages of Aging in Literature $25 (6 sessions) Geraldine Chavis
1-Tednesdays, October 6 - 7ovember 9, 7:30 - 9:00
Puking Vords 7ork For You $20 (5 sessions) Charlotte iIowey
Tuesdays, October 11 - November 8, 10:00 - 11:30
Oil and Acrylics $30 plus $6 special fee (8 sessions) Eleanor Conrad
Thursdays, September 29 - TTovember 17, 1:00 - 3:30 p.m.
Overview of Yoc Thcight and Practice $20 (5 sessions) Mary Gail Petersen
Tuesdays, October 4 - November 1, 7:00 - 8:30 p.m.
Physical Fitness F, Relaxation $18 plus $4 stDPcial fee Alice Pickering
Taursdays, September 29 - November 17, 10:00 - 11:30
PLEASF JOITJ US!
FOPVS CAM EE GIV17T TO ri 71C JA
MC)'TT?
FOR FURTHER Ir1F021d-ATIOW CALL 373-9743
Please register me in the class(es)
Piy check for $ is enclosed.
••T�
r:r S
�uSJ
CITY STATE ZIP
TEL PHOME (work) (bo-ne)
EIRa.KDATE,
SOCIAL SECURITY #
7/2'/77
I a4
i 1
;c U r"4
cU
f
r--
tf1
ON
i=
I
U N rJ
Ir
O
Fi N
.-A
I
N u0
s
ro�
'•�
M H
I.
ro
^, ,,r, c, ,
JJ
a
r-4 • •
U) O • • C
U) O
••
U M
U
M
O
•� v) I (n aJ ••
t7 U) C
U
E
• •
`e -� C
U) • •
O
(n
'.J
cli
I U) C
V) O
C)
to F.
.. C
U O C) r-1
cl, O
>4 M
N 4=.
u�
E r, 0*1
r4 CB O
►.1 r-1
J I
t= U G
r"�
: M
C
ri O
4J O
tJ O
O
r O
G C
7 1
W C
i
r-1 r-4
C9 >
CD
b
O
+J M • •
C
C, �
ri
E
O r1 O
..
J C
U1 Cl
C •ri CO 0
•-i
" cr)
01
,
G+
CO M
c' u O
i
r; r•{
Cl'. Ul D^,
..
N i
4
1 -4
r 4 ri
U
JJ
•H •r1
.oc
U) r -I
4.1 o
•r i
C
G
P c
CD U
CJ
U ••
>4
G <
v;
r0-1 r-
s: w
u
T
•r1
•,�
b
O ?,
O
U
r1 f
tri
44
C)
cr
O`
cJ G ro G
r
M U) C
U0 Q
✓ 4}
.�
a
::I _ a
O G..
cv
r-4 r i •
O
O
O C
o
a. 0
�
4-4
C,
CJ
F+
�)
4='
44 0) aJ
U
R70
Cl
{ •1
G 1
u,
M t
O U) O
• •
UJ O
d
U) U
cU
f
r--
tf1
ON
i=
I
s4
Ir
O
Fi N
.-A
I
N u0
s
ro�
'•�
M H
C') i
ro
CC
JJ
a
r-4 • •
U) O • • C
U) O
••
U M
U
M
O
•� v) I (n aJ ••
t7 U) C
U
E
• •
`e -� C
U) • •
O
(n
N
cli
I U) C
V) O
C)
to F.
.. C
U O C) r-1
cl, O
>4 M
N 4=.
O M
E r, 0*1
r4 CB O
►.1 r-1
J I
t= U G
UI
: M
G I
ri O
4J O
tJ O
O
r O
G C
7 1
W C
i
r-1 r-4
C9 >
CD
b
O
+J M • •
C
C, �
ri
E
O r1 O
ri
J C
f3-
C •ri CO 0
•-i
" cr)
01
> ri
G+
> 00 1
c' u O
N
.,+
(1)j
N i
4
1 -4
r 4 ri
U
JJ
•H •r1
.oc
U) r -I
4.1 o
•r i
C
G
P c
CD U
CJ
U ••
U
G <
v;
r0-1 r-
s: w
u
T
•r1
•,�
b
ri
O
U
r1 f
tri
44
S4
G cy
4.1 •rr O
cJ G ro G
i
M U) C
O
✓ 4}
.�
a
::I _ a
O G..
G
Cl)
ro••
O
O
O C
o
a. 0
�
F7
Pl O
F+
C r"-
. ,
G ✓ )
U
R70
Cl
{ •1
G 1
u,
M t
O U) O
• •
UJ O
d
u� co
CU
� C
o
E
ro
c
O
a=. ro
7
CC)) r-1
Q
cy Ij
ri O
C
iJ C)
>
U=
U C'
>
U •rl
U M
I
G C
C U C
C
••
C
U
C' M
c ••
O
Fj C-4
C
•�
tU
G
r
r -i
U)
C
C) l
U
G
C)
�=
U)
C O
G O
-n G I
O
CJ
F
G
>
r-
O
-4 > O
d
U
h
•ri O
u
-+
U •r1 ••
+.J r-1
JJ C
ccn
1J
cn O
JJ
p r i
cW
w
b oL
N
4
O
>4 W
u
�
o
Lr)
r7
U
U Pa
<
U
_
cU
f
r--
tf1
ON
i=
I
s4
Ir
O
Fi N
.-A
1'
O O
o
ro�
'•�
M H
C') i
ro
CC
JJ
a
r-4 • •
U) O • • C
0.
U CJ
ro
..
cJ
O
•� v) I (n aJ ••
t7 U) C
r -i
rJ ••
ctj
H M
CD
El
M
(n
N
Q ri
I U) C
V) O
E C
to F.
.. C
U O C) r-1
cl, O
>4 M
N 4=.
O M
E r, 0*1
r4 CB O
►.1 r-1
•r4
Q�
O • •
C) C
cC
r- C) O
4J O
tJ O
•r4 Ct
U) -4. •rl
O >-) cC U CF
CJ O
-H C
i
r-1 r-4
C9 >
O
b
O 1-1
+J M • •
•-' U) r i
,
C 11 • • G
ri
N
S4
U
r l • • 00
•i:� 1
C •ri CO 0
•-i
" cr)
ro
> 00 1
c' u O
• • > I •ri
L) EH �
�o
C o o
rl � co M
JJ
•H •r1
.oc
U) r -I
4.1 o
•r i
G
G
0
w
Cj
U ••
CI O
GC U •• N
C'
r0-1 r-
H
0. 0.
4a
tri
44
S4
G cy
4.1 •rr O
cJ G ro G
E.
M U) C
v c0
::I _ a
)
G
Cl)
ro••
O
O
O C
o
a. 0
�
O
v]
E�
C r"-
. ,
G ✓ )
U
R70
Cl
{ •1
G 1
u,
M t
O U) O
• •
UJ O
d
CU
� C
E
O
01 CJ 0 O
7
CC)) r-1
U m
cy Ij
.H
r-1 >
>
U=
U C'
>
U •rl
U! O
I
C:
o
ro
JJ N p
c ••
O
'
C
•�
tU
to
ri
r -i
to
C)
S t
cn
v <C
�=
U)
C a.
f4
CJ
F
G
C)Lr
U
.rel
c
cU
f
r--
tf1
ON
i=
C -J 44
1
1
C I
O
Fi N
.-A
1'
O O
O '.4
f
'•�
M H
C') i
CO cn
CC
JJ
O
r-4 • •
U) O • • C
0.
U CJ
O
cy
^�
U • • �p G
•� v) I (n aJ ••
t7 U) C
r -i
rJ ••
ctj
H M
N
N O
(n
N
Q ri
I U) C
0 0 ri o
M I
to F.
w O
.. C
U O C) r-1
cl, O
U C
Cl C
•t7 O
r4
O
r4 CB O
►.1 r-1
•r4
'
tv
� aJ
cC
O ?�
4J O
tJ O
•r4 Ct
U) -4. •rl
O >-) cC U CF
CJ O
-H C
i
r-1 r-4
C9 >
O
w
FZ. • •
> 1
44 a)
C) H
ri
N
•rl O
_C C7
N JJ
•-i
" cr)
cU
f
r--
tf1
ON
i=
C -J 44
1
1
C I
O
O
C.,
1'
O O
O '.4
yc
M Ft M G^ G-
M H
C) 0
CO cn
JJ
O
r-4 • •
U) O • • C
0.
U CJ
r-•1
1
^�
U • • �p G
•� v) I (n aJ ••
t7 U) C
r -i
rJ ••
C7
H M
N O
(n
N
t: t-)
I U) C
0 0 ri o
r-♦ O
to F.
w O
CJ G
U O C) r-1
r^i •-
U C
Cl C
r4
O
r4 CB O
-HO�
•r4
'
yGJ r,
� aJ
cC
>
4J O
tJ O
•r4 Ct
U) -4. •rl
O >-) cC U CF
CA
-H C
•r4 r -I
C ct r-1 t, O
C9 >
O
G
FZ. • •
> 1
$Gr
C) H
1a
N
•rl O
r -i :�
N JJ
•-i
" cr)
P'4 up
u �
C
L) EH �
�o
.,..1
0
JJ
•H •r1
U) r -I
O G
•r i
CO r -I
G
0
a 0
p-
C'
r0-1 r-
H
0. 0.
tri
M U) C
NC
G
C cJ cn
G
Cl)
ro••
O
O
O C
�
O
ECUr�
Ur-•!
GN
U
R70
r>7OC
vaC7
G 1
u,
>,
O U) O
• •
UJ O
d
CU
� C
E
O
01 CJ 0 O
7
CC)) r-1
U m
cy Ij
.H
r-1 >
>
U=
U C'
>
U •rl
r -i
C:
o
ro
JJ N p
4a Cil
b
•�
C
to
w
to
C)
S t
cn
v <C
U
U)
C a.
i-+ O
o
CZ
----
f
c 14 r-
r--
tf1
ON
CJ 4.1 CM
C -J 44
1
1
O
O O
O '.4
M Ft M G^ G-
M H
O C
0.
t
r-4 •r1 N C)
--
0.
U) N
4J •r1 M
4-J
1
C
•r1 t -I
•� v) I (n aJ ••
t7 U) C
r -i
rJ ••
L+ ^J O (3) •r1 M
'� C
G
p C H > I
N
ro
O
go
0 0 ri o
o o o
••
ri C
y
+
r4 CB O
r-4
•r4
'
4H G ;7 U
4-+ .:. Cl'
cC
44 •ri O :� G CJ
4.4 •ri >1
'H
G M
O >-) cC U CF
O 4
U
C) t':
C ct r-1 t, O
RS
O
0- O
C.C;N
v,,__
vi
Or
I
O C
M O
O CI c
r -i ri C C+
4A O O
U) C? C
U
C�
cu t.ri
.-
r--
0
1
1
n
G
E
O C
0.
O
0.
U) N
O
cJ
U) r -i
• •
O
C1
r -i
O
I
U
N
go
ro
�
y
+
•r4
'
CJ
cn
C
I
O C
M O
O CI c
r -i ri C C+
4A O O
U) C? C
U
C�
cu t.ri
.-
a- .
j�
i�
cJ
cJ
cit
I
go
a- .
i1'?'Ct'��;'.ST ; Y OF p�..•,�r�OTA Continuing Education for I-Torren
— Continuing Edt,catlon and Extension
Fall Quarter, 1977 200 VesLrook Ball
� -srt T. .T•TT! T ^ f •. (.T;.Y 1 nf. w-; !T•
CLAS�..S 4 .. ,.:— t.1 EDl 1A SM:10 2 CO_�L .u,:I y CENTER
Courses listed below vslll be cffcred this fLT1'1 at t:.e Edina Senior Community
Center, 7151 York Avenue Sou --b.
A Iiinnesota law enables studants 62 and over to enroll in credit and noncredit
classes at no cost on a space available basis. All students are responsible for
special and material fees. Students of all ages are welcome.
Detailed course descrjptions are available upon request by calling 373-9743 or
writing to Continuing Education for ?:7omen, 200 t•Iesbrook Hall, 77 Pleasant St. S.E.,
University of Minnesota, ?'.inneapolis, ^d 55455.
Assertiveness Training $25 (6 sessions) Jan Taylor
Wednesdays, October 5 - November 9, 10:04 - 11:30
Camera $30 (8 sessions) Mary Strother
Mondays, October 3 - November 21, 10:30 - 12:00
GenealoRy $15 (4 sessions) Donal Nelson
Fridays, October 7 - October 28, 10:00 - 11:30
In. anes of Fring in Literature $25 (6 sessions) Geraldine Chavis
Wednesdays, October 6 -november 9, 7:30 - 9:00
Making; Tlards T.T,)rk For You $20 (5 sessions) Charlotte Ilowey
Tuesdays, October 11 - november 8, 10:00 - 11:30
Oil and Acrvlics $30 plus $6 special fee (8 sessions) Eleanor Conrad
Thursdays, September 29 - Moveriber 17, 1;00 - 3:30 p.m.
Overview of Yoh- Thought and Practice $20 (5 sessions) Mary Gail Fetersc,i
Tuesdays, October 4 - Movcriber 1, 7:00 - 8:30 p.m.
Physical Fitness & Relaxation $18 plus $4 special fee Alice Pickering
Thursdays, Senten..ber 29 - November 17, 10:00 - 11:30
PLEASE JOIN US!
FORMS CAM M GIV173 TO ;,tARCIA 1,10"M
FOR FUT MHER INFO_'dIATIO d CALL 373-9743
Please register ne in the classes)
N7 check for $ is enclosed.
ITS
ADD :ESS CI'T'Y STATE ZIP
TCLEPFONE (work) 010-ne)
EIRTIMATi SOCIAL SECURITY #
7/2:/77
C,
W
-P
■
C.,
-j
4 Q
co
c3
Cl
.-4
0
1r
cl 1
0 1-4
rn 11
CI o
tp,
to '2
I
o, tr,
c,
r.,
d,
1-4
tia CD 11: 14
2
E U rl
S4 4
C >,
11
0 >1
! "
u0 :1.
-- w
w
ci 0
14 ri
W CL U
7
44 (1)
Llz
Lr. u Ci
v.,
4j ^ rq 14 00
r C-1
C>
No
Aj
T
c:
0
-1 yU
C 1-4 EE7.
U
eq c- o r-1cn
C-
I G G C, Q l
Er I U�4
W r rb L�
•14 (�!
U
p o c r_ o
-j 1-1
rj a C U '1
U w 0 -A
0
C3 r- C)
.14 r 4
::3 c 0 o
•r
4j
> j 4J 0 4J 0
C14 C',
+4 • 4
> I
U N.,4
-4 1-4
C4 14 C,
�j 'A
P- rs L)
u <
4j
Ij
u cl
<
0 N 1-4 C
u E- <u
4J
-4o G
to
H
o -04
rw
co
14 rz
.,q (t tr 0
C4
4j
U
U NM
c
mc.. C
cn
C O C C
a
C
,4 r -q
En
0 r -
r -I fn -
L) ri c
r NCO
Nc r-
N Uo
r
C) v) c
U)
c
U ,
M :J O Q c�
p cn v c) q
C -Z
>
0 > C:
L; E-
0 tr r- C
v.cl c
a) 14 vi
Aj
4j
H r-4 z
4 tr.,
-H 14
4J U
W $4
10 Co 41
W L, $4 U
b
14 0 4 J
10.1 w .,4 w
L) m
a) •r144
W
ci
tf)
M
ON
0 Cl
E o E C 0
5 0
tW
rn
C2
cz w C" cl
CZ
0
0 r
o 0 !z 'D 5 cn
0 x 0 Z G
0 !-, m
,2 N O E r-
M w 0
cn m t' r-
cn w ..
V)
r--
tn(�
c� 12 rp=- Ir) 0 o,
. r- v)
cl . 0
C> -,4 0
—2
4 t2 P.
4J -H M
I rL 4 Cl)
En c 4J
0 4J M C�
U) 14 C 4J Co r.
to ol v.,
> oD l
(7 c)
c E > t
0 0
1, t4 >
14
0 1-4 -H O
?
419
Aj
o GC u0
U u
<
C ei
-H 0 :j V rj
44 c ca
t4 -4 >•
ej tz
-4 o c) cl t, r,'
>J cc v tz
u W t:
O r- 0
c. 1-4 G. 0
0 CL 0
Fn Lo
Lo
1 0
0
0
V
0 C)
en C)
r-
0
opo
G cl c-
0 I
(R
c K
R lu-
o
C, C,
C14
Ln eq c)
V) �4 c�
C> O4
0.
C,
ul 0 0
c.
Lrl
14
1p
riw
En
Q
E,w
es w c
C)
Ln
cu tc
w ci 6
U
F-;
C
0
E -H
ej
(U
L;
cli
C14
LA
0
En
LO)
•C,
14 12
w (2
$4 M�4
ri
cl
C,
C) ILI
L)
■
MEMORANDUM
October 19, 1977
TO: Robert Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: 1976 and 1977 Community Development Funds.
Attached is a letter from Hennepin County notifying the
City that it may now incur costs associated with the neighborhood parks
improvement projects for 1977. As you know, the Park Department
proposed that these funds be used to improve Chowen, Parbury, and Grand-
view Pakrs. At present, however, you will be allowed to use 1977 CD
funds for improvements to only Chowen Park due to eligibility require-
ments. Depending upon rulings from HUD, you may be able to use funds
for Parbury and Grandview Parks at a future date (although I doubt it).
Please contact me prior to incurring any costs or issuing any contracts
for Chowen Park improvements so that they may be checked for compliance
with federal regulations.
® I have also been advised by the County that $18,331 of
1976 park improvement funds remain unused. You will recall that these
funds can be used for Weber, York and Alden Park improvements. If
additional improvements to these parks are not planned or if such
improvements will not utilize the total funds remaining, it may be
advisable to transfer these funds to other CD accounts such as the
Diseased Tree Replacement program (i.e., acquisition of nursery stock)
or the Edina Mills project. Please advise me of your thoughts.
GH:ks
CC: Ken Rosland
u
IM
EDINA ASSOCIATIONS — (Presidents)
Braemar City of Lakes Figure
Skating Club
Mrs. Woody (Betty) Cater
Edina, MN 55435
1(830) Edina Baseball Association
Mr. Bob Burley
Edina, MN 55424
I (400) Edina Basketball Association
Mr. Dave Weiss
Edina, MN 55436
f (700) Edina Football Association
Mr. Lloyd Larson
Edina, MN 554:15
Edina Girls' Athletic Association
Mrs. Robert P. (Corky) Neuman
Edina, MN 55436
The following sports are
included in E.G.A.A.:
(360) Basketball
( 44) Flag Football
Hockey
( 97) Team Tennis
Volleyball
Edina Girls' Softball Association
Mrs. Monty J. (Jean) Ferguson
Edina, MN 554Jb
•
revised - 11/1977
(500) Edina Gymnastics Association
Mr. and Mrs. Mel Peacock
Edina, MN 55435
Edina Historical Association
Mr. Earl Rickheim
Edina, MN 55424
(1,150) Edina Hockey Association
Mr. Michael A. LaFond
Edina, MN 55424
(1,990) Edina Soccer Association
Mr. John Porter
Edina, MN 55424
Edina Special Children's Group (E.S.C.G.)
Mrs. B. T. (Birdie) Bagley
mina, MN 55435
(100) Edina Swim Club
Mrs. Arthur G. (Jane) Rotman
Edina, MN 55436
Heritage Preservation Board
Mr. Foster Dunwiddie
Edina, MN 55424
Leisure Time Committee of E.S.C.G.
Mr. Hal Liljenquist
F,u�LLa, MN 55424
9 ,LF -d (j. OF-aldinan, CPC U
INSURANCE CONSULTANT
100 BUILDERS EXCHANGE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE (612) 336-5866
City of Edina
Athletic Associations
Recommended Insurance -
Workers' Compensation Insurance Including:
Employer's Liability insurance with limit of. $100,000.
All States Endorsement
Comprehensive General Liability Insurance Including:
Personal Injury and Property Damage
Officers, Managers and Employees to be covered
as additional insureds
Products Liability
Non -Owned and Hired Car Automobile Liability
insurance to be included
City of Edin;a to be named as additional insured
only insofar as Athletic Association
activities are concerned
Recommended Minimum Limits
Personal Injury $300,000/$500,000
Property Damage $100,000
November 14, 1978
9
ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE PARK BOARD AND
THE PARK AND RECREATION STAFF
From the Minutes of the November 8, 1977 Park Board Meeting
The basic philosophy that the Edina Park and Recreation Department staff recommends
to be used in working with the athletic associations in order to maintain good
programs is as follows:
The Edina Park Board and the Edina Park and Recreation Department recognize the
individual athletic associations in the City of Edina as the only governing body
for each respective sport. The Edina Park Board, in cooperation with the Edina
Park and Recreation Department, will administer and help each individual association
plan, provide facilities, and give professional direction regarding operation
of their association, so as to maintain the basic philosophies. Also, the Edina
Park and Recreation Department acts as a liaison between the associations and the
Edina Park Board to help see that the associations are providing a well rounded
and equal program for all participants.
The Edina Park and Recreation Department staff recommend the following guidelines
be followed:
1) That all boys and girls receive an equal opportunity to participate
in any activity at whatever ability level they may play.
2) Have fun.
0 3) Build good sportsmanship and character.
4) Learn basic fundamentals of the sport they participate in.
5) Be a good team member.
6) Learn to accept discipline.
7) Have a reasonable amount of practice and games.
8) The Edina Park and Recreation Department staff should encourage the use
of volunteers on the Board of Directors, as well as in the coaching,
because we believe in the philosophy of citizen involvement.
9) Selection of members to serve on the Board of Directors and as coaches
should be based on the prospective member having the understanding of the
basic program for all ability levels and all ages.
ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS RELATIO"NSHIP WITH THE PARK BOARD AND
THE PARK AND RECREATION STAFF
From the Minutes of the November 8, 1977 Park Board Meeting
The.basic philosophy that the Edina Park and Recreation Department staff recommends
to be used in working with the athletic associations in order to maintain good
programs is as follows:
The Edina Park Board and the Edina Park and Recreation Department recognize the
individual athletic associations in the City of Edina as the only governing body
for each respective sport. The Edina Park Board, in cooperation with the Edina
Park and Recreation Department, will administer and help each individual association
plan, provide facilities, and give professional direction regarding operation
of their association, so as to maintain the basic philosophies. Also, the Edina
Park and Recreation Department acts as a liaison between the associations and the
Edina Park Board to help see that the associations are providing a well rounded
and equal program for all participants.
The Edina Park and Recreation Department staff recommend the following guidelines
be followed:
1) That all boys and girls receive an equal opportunity to participate
in any activity at whatever ability level they may play.
2) Have fun.
• 3) Build good sportsmanship and character.
4) Learn basic fundamentals of the sport they participate in.
5) Be a good team member.
6) Learn to accept discipline.
® 7) Have a reasonable amount of practice and games.
8) The Edina Park and Recreation Department staff should encourage the use
of volunteers on the Board of Directors, as well as in the coaching,
because we believe in the philosophy of citizen involvement.
9) Selection of members to serve on the Board of Directors and as coaches
should be based on the prospective member having the understanding of the
basic program for all ability levels and all ages.
0