HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-12-13 Park Board PacketEDINA PARK BOARD MEETING
Tuesday, December 13th, 1977
7:30 p.m.
EDINA CITY HALL
I. Approval of Minutes of November 8th, 1977
II. Historical Society Presentation - Mr. Foster Dunwiddie
III. Old Mill Site Findings - Mr. Richard Busch
IV. Planning Request: S-77-21
V. Planning Request: S-77-25 & Z-77-18
VI. Planning Request: S-77-26
VII. Planning Request: S-77-27
VIII. Planning Request: S-77-28 & Z-77-20
IX. Recreation Report
X. Other Reports
O P E N D I S C U S S I O N
---- ----------
(minutes will not be taken
during this time period)
•
LOCATION MAP.....,
1— Q f
_CIFiCI:E �V 1
W
Gtr VJ 0 i
SS Y i4�
�4
y�✓ 9yt � tel` Y�
�t'�•i`.,�' t3r. .t_ .�''�? .' �• - R A E M A R
BA PARK
'COMPLEX,-.'
-
zonino
Su 13 d -1*V i S -1,*. 0 Y111
Banco Properties, Inc. - Northwestern bank Addit
S-77-28
REQUEST NUMBER: Z-77-20
LOCATION: Washington Ave. & Valley View
REQUEST: Rezoning and platting for a
detached banking facility with a
drive-in teller
O 250 500 7750 1000
V111aae planning department vLAte of edin
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 30, 1977
Z-77-20 and Banco Properties, Inc. Rezoning from PID to 0-1
S-77-28 Northwestern Bank Addition
Refer to: Attached graphic and preliminary plat
The subject property is a two acre tract of land located between County
Road 18 and Washington Avenue, and north of Valley View Road. This
property is presently zoned PID, which is in conformance with the
Southwest Edina Plan.
Banco Properties, Inc. proposes to construct a detached banking facility
for Northwestern National Bank of Hopkins on this site. A preliminary site
plan is attached for this facility.
Staff has determined that a detached banking facility is classified as a
financial institution which is not an allowable use in PID zones but is
allowable in office zones. Therefore, the proponents are requesting a
rezoning to 0-1 Office District. A preliminary plat of the property is
. also requested.
Recommendations Staff believes that the proposed rezoning and use of the
site is appropriate based upon its proximity to the County Road 18 - Valley
View Road Interchange. In other similar locations, such as the T.H. 100 -
Industrial Blvd. industrial area, we have allowed office uses in more visible
locations in close proximity to major interchanges while locating industrial
uses in less visible areas.
Due to the Southwest Edina Plan, however, staff is somewhat reluctant to
recommend the rezoning of one parcel of property without concurrently
amending the Southwest Edina Plan. Therefore, staff recommends a plan
amendment to designate an area abutting the County Road 18 - Valley View
Road interchange as office uses as shown on the attached graphic. Staff
recommends this amendment in that:
1) the improvements to the Valley View - County Road 18
interchange are essentially complete
2) the area is well suited for office uses.
3) the existing parcels of property in this area are below
minimum size requirements for PID uses and would require
variances to allow such uses. Such variances would not be
required for office uses.
Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning and subdivision with the
following conditions and modifications:
Z-77-20 and
S-77-28
Banco Properties
Page 2
November 30, 1977
1) Parkland dedication per the attached report.
2) Rezoning is contingent cn the amendment of the
Southwest Edina Plan.
3) Rezoning is contingent on final plat approval.
GH:ks
11/23/77
• .�Y .. moi'- __ r ',�.
2 U4
^,/ � x 1'�"'' ' '±' ', %`MF,% Y'�i'.... .-, }•! %/ s. 4&—k%'a` f. �i - :�°'`9- ,a�,X•r/.;/; AA �- - ` �j) --"" ("�'�
KAI—
'�'r4+ 3 SJR ✓/ '; � l._ '. /��{'-f r'd
N.ti as Y.r,�.�.l: �.. ..t../J ._-1...✓ R',et.-... \ A/n," ... y
J
i
����L�k��� ` y •.tr ��i, y'yy..'�, � .. -
•i \ e
� Al t j _ ( .�}�y-� 4-{.iL.rDiYi/a . • L
r
S o
10
Zn
Ila 0
N
_ O
v r
Q p o o m V
iE t tr Z N N CL ID
r. Y\LU ,.
LijU0�� ��•3 y• N �' N c O a
Ln
LU
c x O
Ln Z07
� �' �� `• r w It ' „ F (. � '�\ ' r �'
---c cr O W,
CD
x
y ,+•� 7 � 1IiMh�- d
C c r
�\
i
J� r
ILI'
,\ �. ��<��"\�\�`y�' `; Fy�y`+aa) '�•� � qx 1 .:;.; ��L�: .•.i- z�y4��oia�:�3tXnt3ilSSatii.._.�. ____-.�T ! _.._.-- - ' -- `.-'-'y-'. •. ____y...
A
... � G... r i r fVf1! •
WkSNN6
Iram Avg -rOUTN Now 1171
�OQ7rNWEJ7-'QN _NST/ONA[ 0AIVIr
.........
• N..
•r'.•', Nr •/
..� . .. _.._.►� • - '!» j:'.: vw .r /... R a Iw. it. SIA VENUE —_�so.
'��•i� /...r .... ..K Nf•Ik':1'.s �r+�—�N►.i
`-
WASHINGTON � ..�''`- '•'
•�-----M/1 Y irlfr.f/ t
•
• T
--_ � •rs� � / 1 I 1 `` .' is
I P�
• i
1
- 1 i�_ `, `— ` � X71' 0<<»Nb, � -''=�--•— _ _= ='±`.
rx
/
Subdivision No -S -77--c2_40-0-4
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: O (.JQST� r( kNQ::;U (77(101
LAND SIZE:: �2� 4.7. e- ZLLe- • L_.LAND VALUE:
ZONIC�i 1 ( v�ro O5'R�1 '� �1r'LT--�� '► O � -�
(By: Date: �� Z3 7 )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
UA. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $'k L-, pQV as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
11 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
II 2. If property is 6 acr�:s or will be combined with future dedications-
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for stcrm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
LOCATION MAP
subdivision
Dewey Hill Addn.
REQUEST NUMBER: ,jj67 � -27
LOCATION: N. of W 78th; W. of Braemar Pk.
& S. of Dewey Hill RX. -
REQUEST:
.
REQUEST: 26 lot single family plat
11llaSe manning depgrtment vi11age of erlitt8
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 30, 1977
S-77-27 Dewey Hill Addition. Schuster Property.
Refer to: Attached preliminary plat and Indian
Meadows graphics
Three years ago, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved a development
proposal known as Indian Meadows for the area referred to as the Schuster
property. This site measured 70 acres in size and extended from Dewey Hill
Road on the north to W. 78th Street on the south. A development plan was
approved which would allow 40 single family dwellings on the northerly
portion of the property which remained R-1 zoning and 291 multiple
dwelling units on the southerly portion of the site which was proposed to
be rezoned PRD -2. The northerly and southerly portions of the site were
divided by open space lands dedicated for the Southwest Edina storm sewer
ponding system. The single family lots on the northerly portion of the
site were to be served by two cul-de-sac streets from Dewey Hill Road.
Multiple family residences on the southerly portion of the site were to
be served by a cul-de-sac from W. 78th Street.
Since its approval by the Planning Commission, the subject property has
been sold. The present owners are now proposing a single family subdivision
of the northerly portion of the site. Access to such lots would be provided
by a cul-de-sac from Dewey Hill woad. As compared to the previously
approved plan for the northerly portion of the site, the present plan
proposes a reduction in the total number of lots from 40 to 26.
These lots range in size from 18,000 square feet to 53,000 square feet which
is substantially larger than existing lots to the north and east. A
20 foot wide out_lot is also proposed westerly of Lot 1 to provide access
from Dewey Hill Road to City owned lands.
Staff and the proponents have discussed generally the development of the
southerly portion of the Schuster property, i.e., that portion of the Indian
Meadows concept proposed for multiple dwellings Although the proponents
have not submitted any plans for this area, they have indicated their intent to
propose a lower density development than previously approved.
Adequate access and traffic circulation is of primary concern for the
southern portion of the site. Planning Commission will recall bat in its
approval of Braemar Hills 9th Addition on November 2, 1977, it requested
that three lots be identified as an outlot to facilitate the possible access
extension of a roadway to serve the southerly portion of the Schuster property.
Although Delaney Blvd. had not been authorized by the Council, this roadway
could serve the Schuster property from the east. West 78th Street provides
southerly access. Therefore, due to 1) the provision of adequate access from
the east, south and west, 2) the multiple residential character of the
S-77-27
Dewey Hills Addn.
Page 2
November 30, 1977
southerly portion of the property and the single family character of the
northerly portion of the property as well as other properties, 3) the
natural division between the northerly and southerly portions of the property
created by public open space lands and the Southwest Edina storm sewer ponds
and 4) perceived traffic problems on Dewey Hill Road, Planning Staff .
believes that the northerly and southerly portions of the site should not
be connected with a roadway. Such a connection was not proposed as part
of the Indian Meadows concept.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision
in that:
1) the proposal conforms with the Southwest Edina Plan.
2) the subdivision proposes a lower density than the
previously approved Indian Meadows concept.
3) lot sizes are similar to and exceed existing single
family lots in the vicinity of the subject property.
4) adequate access to public open space lands has been pro-
vided from Dewey Hill Road.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1) an executed developer's agreement.
2) submission of an erosion control plan.
GH:ks
11/23/77
m
�o
11t I
' lei
` \ / 11/r J J� � 11• t l t f+.J
l '� \ \ \ \ ` • ` - /ii r�1111' 1 I 1 11 `\t\1 I I��I
� \ \ \ � •r !I, I I , � /ill �`\11; 'i
r
r/ as�, •�/!� i `` \ `��LL-.—`->`/ a_ w �/ l I I J I MIN
1 � \ I11111r�� ~ .+ 3' � •'t:. / /W11 \o \��-�_��_��_— 'Ill � \'/ l � ,���\
e
/
/ I
tit
A.
I i /
/
! > oos
i
ELI r --i F-1
��-L__�=
L
AK
�v
----west ... 781W"'streel
INDIAN MEADOWS
utility plan
0 50 200
November 22, 1977
TO: Gordon Hughes, Director of Planning
FROM: Robert C. Dunn, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Utility Utility and Miscellaneous Engineering Considerations
Proposed Dewey Hill Addition
A review of preliminary information submitted raises the following preliminary
utility and miscellaneous engineering concerns regarding proposed Dewey Hill
Addition that must be resolved before final approval can be recommended:
1. Need development plan for entire Schuster property to finalize road
pattern and traffic flow in Southwest area.
2. Watermain must be connected to Buchanan Addition line and extended
through cul de sac to Dewey Hill.
3. Watermain in West cul de sac can be 12" Copper to serve five homes.
4. Park land dedication or fee.
5. West cul de sac grade is extreme and must be re-examined.
6. Water services on Dewey Hill Road that are not used must be cut off
at main and sanitary sewer services plugged at curb line.
7. Homeowner's Association, must, by documentation, assume responsibility
for maintenance of barrier built along Dewey Hill and islands in street
right-of-way.
8. To determine path location in this plat, we should have overall path
plan for southwest area.
9. When location of path in this plat has been determined, who is to build it?
10. Open area at West edge of plat is not needed by City for ponding. Area
below 840 contour is subject to flooding however,and must be maintained as
open space/nature area.
11. Dewey Hill Road will, in the future, be improved with concrete curb and
gutter, bituminous paving and sidewalk to M.S.A. Standard Section. If
road pattern in area can be finalized per Item #l, this project should be
undertaken in 1978.
12. Drainage plan, including drainage structures located off public right-of-
way, must be evaluated to insure complete drainage of property. Might be
necessary to document restrictions on grading of lots to insure proper
drainage to on site structures.
13. Suggested street sections must be evaluated for durability and proper
function.
MEMORANDUM
November 23, 1977
TO: Robert Kojetin
FROM: Gordon L. Hughes
SUBJECT: Parkland Dedication for Dewey Hill Addition
We have received a preliminary subdivision for the northerly
portion of the Schuster property. A development proposal, Indian Meadows,
was approved three years ago for this property. At that time, the owner
of the property dedicated to the City a substantial amount of property for
the Southwest Edina storm sewer ponding areas and open space purposes.
However, in that density for the Indian Meadows plan was based upon all
the Schuster property including that dedicated to the City, the Park
Board felt that an additional 5% cash dedication should be made (i.e., the
concept being that the property dedicated by Schuster was worthless to
him in that he received all the development density he was entitled to).
In that this subdivision was never completed, this 5% dedication ($52,000)
was not made.
The present preliminary subdivision proposes a substantial reduction in
density as compared to the Indian Meadows plan. Therefore, I believe
that the original rationale for requesting a cash dedication is no
longer valid since the owner is not now deriving any density benefits from
the lands previously dedicated to the City. I recommend that no additional
cash dedication should be required at this time.
Lastly, I think it is important to review our ordinance requirements
regarding park dedication. The ordinance does not state that land must
be dedicated solely for park (i.e., active park) purposes. It states
that "land shall be dedicated for parks, playgrounds, public open space,
or storm water holding areas or ponds." I thus believe that the dedication
made for the Southeast Edina storm water ponds satisfies ordinance require-
ments for parkland dedication.
GLH:ks
cc: Ken Rosland
subdivisio"-%
Edina Interchange 6th Addn.
REQUEST NUMBER: 5-77-26
LOCATION: E. of Metro Blvd; W of Hwy 100
& N. of Edina Industrial Blvd.
REQUEST: Rpnl,,r of PYICt Ing
districts
V.ilitEe WantlinB do Village of eth
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 30, 1977
S-77-26 Edina Interchange 6th Addition.
Refer to: Attached graphic
The proponents are requesting a replat of part of Lot 4 and Lots 5 and 6,
Block 6, Edina Interchange Center. Presently, Lots 5 and 6 are oriented
in a north/south direction. The effect of the proposed replat is to
orient these lots in an east/west direction. Each of the three new
lots created would measure about 1.3 acres.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision in
that:
1) no additional lots will be created.
2) the request complies with the subdivision and zoning
ordinance.
3) Parkland dedication per the attached report.
GH:ks
11/23/77
�O[./LEVARD
0
ft r . y .•. s
METRO
I �
®
A � • ; .r � a •7 0 �
1 J~
i
t�
C1if/• •t �' •t 0 r�
W
1
I �
�
., ryrr•Orr�M
ft p
D
.A
.
r
J '7 V•
C
! ......r rwf•or
0
�O[./LEVARD
0
ft r . y .•. s
®
A � • ; .r � a •7 0 �
1 J~
i
C1if/• •t �' •t 0 r�
W
r/ f7.r 7, r77+
Y
�
., ryrr•Orr�M
ft p
g: � i7 J r r 4. 7 •n rr
.
r
J '7 V•
_
! ......r rwf•or
0
W
Subdivision No. t� —7 — Z��
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commi=ssion
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: (� � G�� G10C�- Cm�r'' 6_� ",i
LAND SIZE: ( 31,0k 2.On O -I LAND VALUE:
(By: Date: 11/2-:1 7))
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
ElA. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $� Q �Q. _ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
(� beneficially expands the park.
M 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end resultwill be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
j� 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
El4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved. for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
11 6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
j�'j 2.
1,0CATION M
`I Y
.— HYDE a
PARK o
��-
• •1%'1,:3, ii''`i
� WL
W
'f' z
N• ; J
BRAE JR • l�l
LLJ
Z(13i1Y1g
Braemar Hills 9th Addn
REQUEST NUMBER: Z-77-18 & S-77-25
LOCATION: E. of Gleason Rd. extended and
N. of W. 78th Street.
REQUEST: PRD -2 to R-1. and R-2 Districts
Replat and rezoning of townhouse project
for 29 single family and 16 two family
r4I=ifii't+
yilbar planning d�nrtrncnt �illnge 4�f c�iin�
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 2, 1977
S-77-25 and Braemar Hills 9th Addition. Generally located east of
Z-77-18 Gleaseon Road extended and north of W. 78th Street.
PRD -2 to R-1 and R-2 District.
Refer to: June 27, 1973 and August 1, 1973 Planning
Commission Minutes, Hills of Braemar Town-
house graphic, preliminary plat.
Four years ago, the subject property was rezoned to PRD -2, Planned Residential
District to allow the construction of 132 units in the form of 33 quadraminium
buildings. The location of such buildings and appurtenant access roadways
are shown on the attached graphic. To date, 4 quadraminiums and a
recreation building have been constructed in conformance with the approved
development plan for this property. In addition, the property surrounding
these completed units has beE�n platted as Braemar Hills 8th Addition.
The proponents are presently requesting a rezoning from PRD -2 to R-1 and
R-2. A 45 lot subdivision is also requested. As proposed, the 29 lots
located in Blocks 1, 2, 3 and 4 would be zoned R-1 and the 16 lots located
in Blocks 5 and 6 would be zoned R-2. Outlot A which measures 3.56 acres
would be dedicated to the City according to the proposed subdivision.
As compared to the previously approved PRD -2 plan, the present subdivision
proposes to use essentially the same building sites for R-1 and R-2
dwellings which would have been used for quadraminiums. Stonewood Court
which is located northerly of Gleason Road is located on nearly the same
alignment as proposed by the previous plan. The alignment of Tanglewood
Court has been altered signi:_icantly to provide additional sight distance
for traffic approaching its :intersection with Gleason Road. Excluding
existing and planned quadraminiums in Braemar Hills 8th Addition, the
present plan proposes a reduction in the total number of dwelling units
from 112 to 61 as compared to the previously approved PRD -2 plan.
The Planning Commission may recall that the protection of the heavily wooded
steep slopes on the property was of such concern when reviewing the previous
PRD plan. The present subdivision proposes to limit considerably construction
on such slopes and proposes to dedicate most of these areas to the City.
Staff is somewhat concerned :aith the relationship of the subject property
with the vacant lands located easterly. The Planning Commission will
recall that a development plan entitled Indian Meadows was approved for
this property several years ago. However, this property has been sold
recently and the present owner has indicated his intent not to proceed
with the Indian Meadows concept. Of primary concern to staff is the
advisability of extending Stonewood Court on the subject property into the
property to the east to provide a secondary means of access. Therefore,
staff believes that adequate right-of-way should be reserved to facilitate
the extension of Stonewood Court if warranted by the development of the
property to the east.
Braemar Hills 9th Addition
Page -2-
November 2, 1977
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested subdivision
and rezoning in that:
1) the proposal conforms with the Southwest Edina Plan.
2) the heavily wooded steep slopes on the site are adequately
protected.
3) the realignment of Tanglewood Court is desirable.
4) adequate setbacks from existing and planned
quadraminiums are maintained.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1) lots 8, 9 and 10, Block 4 must be identified as an
outlot to facilitate the easterly extension of
Stonewood Court if warranted.
2) a storm water storage easement must be.dedicated on
portions of Lots 1, 2,4, 5, and 6, Block 4.
3) an executed deed to the City of Edina for Outlot A.
4) an executed developer's agreement.
5) relocation, removals and re -sealing of existing storm
sewers, water services, and sewer services per the
attached preliminary engineering report.
6) dedication of a 15 foot wide strip of land on the north
edge of Lot 14, Block 4.
7) submission of a suitable landscape plan for Braemar
Hills 8th Addition
8) all activities relating to the landscaping and snow
removal business located on Blocks 5 and 6 must be
terminated and all equipment, materials and supplies
removed prior to final plat approval for any portion of
the subject: property.
9) within 180 days following final plat approval for Blocks
5 and 6, all dwellings and structures located on Blocks
5 and 6 must be satisfactorily removed. A performance
bond in the amount of $5,000 will be required at the
time of final plat approval to assure removal of such
structures.
10) submission of an erosion control plan.
IGH:ks
10/27/77
Z-72-6
•"
C
rcTOC��:int '��^7.ta� '. c"'��..1,025 407" ,.
l;c^:., �c� :r a_;: ,• z .��, �t`r.;i:. ..o.. .1 ci _
SLI -_J_ iI'_.�1.V�1��''"t'.. :_.', 1}) 1:YtiCL .r;j`1•t.1,a•:Tt.i.i:
:_7
_ :_7 �r r T:'
..:_�.::� .i. .:... �:�..]-
;1.1..':l
Mr, Luce presented a revised project bcoklet and poi^ ed ou cc : _ :c1 mod'_s -
cations :raze bc�n cu(iC pL`tf:u_I:t i:0 pYC:: icl Y'�' ^.:1 b CC^'^ 3.liOn .^L' ,�,C'3t`." C :7 a -'1-
road will ccanect to 73th Strcct vast or: i~farth Road, ac::::L�7.ic.n- 1) t::e
F..:'f :nd of i)Lti?3r.tn
o_ving r. rou4. ' a 3d78.h c -...est Co:meet to Gleason ritli:the Villal;C 1"'Mits. 1' !31-t:7 a'- •) lr.:
F
to 4.67 units per acre, trtd the tc .-ag phy a1-2tation at th.-! northi=. !-id Of the
site vill be p_esarvc.-d A s=11 ':':�l�sred' prop(-rzy I:a3 breis pu -chaserl so i;za T.ojec�.
is "toL•a'�ly p1zi-:ned" and say prom s•_cn9 ?nto tlhe site sin- a beet a Um natad, Appro-
nately :-,:a aeras of .p--rkl.= d will 1:e den .t:ed to the Vi11a-;e, wb—) ;n I cont-_ibute
about ria ac,a to i:i:�� cicveloF:ae. to C a"r, •n the rr .l::rt of =' Cf :lle Z4'_:Y ci Ya�ue of
additic:val acreage necessary to =c.;z the full pr.rk3.a:.nd rcqu rz• _.at �rould ba
receiVc_I in li_s of tha land dcnatior., rca:I vIll bn in with
the SO.. tt'a.73st idinII --=--i:T 1' L�:�'.(lj o Ti12 iCl'.1:^: ti iC air:'O L2C a rCui Co
that a!*' drJ-xa3 co=2 Prom th3 sada= of the ODCY.-n- tlh:: 'A rzont of l�iC' ::Arlt:l
and f ll--7Ans the SCrz..ge, stalls .to Lc Sr��' ^CCio 1`:ir, LL"CC r. C: Gx�'wi:C:Cd :"_pPY� v 3�. .:or Lhe
reasons stated in the st=ff rei,ort,
Hr, HL3I:es questA.
ioned tie cut P� d fila. is vo?v_d, nr:d c--,. 3:ped ti:e
Only CL':tir"3 is in tllt t arsa wh cb h_-3 ::Tres "}' U;::C•ri E'i_C'tvritC.'i t7 TOun:! Of E .ih2 siope
and giv;:! sera topo?rspny to the filli:l on top of t^ -Ie l:ili is -,;*,--r2 the
grade 1.1 90' and has to be filled to t;r}cct a sioFe rat -her than c etaEp grs-33.
In reply to I•ir. HnCheo, the dsve? c„e:. said the pr icy' All. ran a i'iol- $05,000
t`- *$60,000 per tr.:it. Each four trait bu-J ding :rill app:.ar as a Sinigi4, :zo:r. 0
Mr. Dian curs...^nded tha &.elcr:2rs fo_ nsxi -,; a �7ull p-:71: dc-latio.1 ars yet
reque✓t:'.S1- .I.C.sn d'onsity than wazj d have b_ari �rl'.G:i :! thn.12i.- T:h:^. ..Ol':::h L:.4it 5.^.•3 flan.
`✓ j. t ,rte `•� • 'r t0 '�'-_ F't:i�._i.. j
]Tio Iics,'. L11:1 mcL,rcd Co :�Ci7'i L, >�C'l�:l [:;ia :1. t'V a._G�._�.1.I`.;� •;
tion 4',h!'•1 2'l34^,Cil o Iii :•it.'L•�.l _l'ia [.::: %::'_ �L'li•, a.�.l '!O%ti:il .ya. t:�3t.ion c
----_ __ S
Z•-73-6 F,elccaticn �
T._sl�• P:.rce'..s:�2 j=�E:','.'_3g�5r S' _,�.T��
;Tc
�
n:.e_
� • And
Tz
Fi_ i i'L?�:I�:' err iii.►a'iy,
Mr, Luce refe:tanced the pro-7ect booklet proviced by the proponent, and
noted final 3e•.elopmant P1an aFp:o ar is requested for "C-MJo.-.iriL:ns for I?dina". 2110
final dev.i..i:.ent plans conform to tl:a concapt ap?r-jval gra.it.ed, therefore approval
iu recov_-,:_-,.�t_'d, for the reascnS £ti1i:(ral ill the sta'H YCj?Oi't , Si':) j'JCt t0 3n E2^pYOJPd
p�.rt., tron.i.::r of tia'
tle^ prior to fin..l d7alopmcnt plzn �.iroval by the Council, Fad
revocation :,r .tha e.:istir ; F;:adi:ls ;)ei:1-t hard by J, A. Daa.!ns, Ile explained that
becru:>e taa deveiopr:ent pians ap'.:i.rred 412.3 Lased Oa Lhe grades, the zoninf;
should be &::;ied if any further ;;r :dict; occurs.
!t: Jcck Smecl.lcr, the 4-.reh'tnct, preue:ht.!d acv's^1 character sketches of '
the urtit i'r';:''-A rnd C.Yto 'i Or plan.;.'e . ill '_e^ly 1:0.V. !103 Ile noted two I etlru0:1
-•� it:t tFill r.?] for $4t3 QG0 to '`0"0;.0., :and mu) ')edrac.',: and der, unit:: gill sell ::or
to $70,J:3. 7terc Lua 33 bti:(itis::; 12 are cp?it 1c%els cnrt 21 are two stories,.
JJ-., rt:nyan r.o-.ed the rt'Tfll{:. from It-! :o TIRT-•2 and the final developaent
T,';;.ilii be ri,)•:f04eI� uith the :}:F::.: C�'r:ijC}`,:;r-iCs r',:Cid Ly Lha EtL.'.'to Mr. Hughes SOL0I1C.ed
fill vurad rya . t:c>� .c�i t�: ril :d,
I
• - ,:r� Y`
/L • 3
. \ �• I �I ,ir 11
1
1 1 tae _ /• O
III• I N - •;II i . 1�• � n / /' � � 1•
1I� � ; t i • [111 1 � , / /. '
jL 1 � '/\ �v 111,11 •Ili 11 ,�� / /. / r.' r .
TI
. 1 .�`' =`` �! $�� ___..i � -+• _ 111 �• Y
I i MARTH ROAD - ♦
fill n 1
fcr _ i ., ►
Fi
VILLA GErAf,iAKIATES OF ED_NA DEVELOPERS' I ���•� V{{ �
100
V fiil� sw 111• of
'••. •�I�'. �w � V 11! 2 p Q p 1�GtX�a � '.
�.� East
�-. t LO
1 16 ...� ,. h .• � " �i5,ccv,'�- ^ lay aGo� o a ' ; I
••1� �, :. � �• � � 94ff .s , (S,000* � �1,'il+riz •
J _
�'.f1• 1 1. �,'`.,: v
-L .5 Iz,Oa ooa F1 d
m ttnd ,P
•fir - .• S• •`• tl' Sib
6p'$BRAE OR
�. , , _ '•. 97 � as - 'sea �S , S 1 V,ctt'R' - -
A . r • '•s4y ISpao* 1z,0oo" tt,400� 13/c
.t eN
60O f
. �, �, 91. •°t ��. 1 2 N 9'40* E
,. to 7 01 .� } q< 15,., t 137.45
•s`s.` • , ^ � �2;'A' / // � j inf i � \ M� �_T�� �\ � \ \ 1(0,�� � _ � � � � 4,�,q \w.
.i • � / /� � I 44.15 L � \ . // / / / 1 s 1 �
•^ %��►� / 1 � 10�� \\ IO�r % � �� 1l ll� �,
i ; • / I %�I;I SD \ \`1�, iii/ � � I11� 11
B R A EIMAR HILI -S
L / Illi f /A 6 • $ �_ l IS �'� ���\ CP`�
6 i cr-,;, 3
.� .. ,'. (� \ $� \\ G// I"?�yi,e w \\�•�\��� 1 III 1 ,W 1 I �:.
S�:/ ftq�zjj 2 `\\\\,'\\ylj1� / 1 '� �I t . i124dz,4i0t�0
I I`Ilti,;lU;/rii%// ///NS
Ncy I
8TH ADD.s'SS"zS' I 1111\moi/�//, / /• �i�—I /
n. $46 h �St " j �� I'�.�. 1 \ III !/ I yj�� i ! to .
:. i• P��{> >*" a ?1jY ice. �j �1: f ►AVO r 11 II'%/ r� ` I 1 M '
�. �� �'� c•`v�-� ��i�� ��� �c _ � '��"�\ 'moi � Y"'/ii,;�'%t5.4�7; % � I '
,r S J`S. OjI\\/oY`c�a?�•�_� i.FLO /.J i 1i \'�'..'_� !i/;i�jy'�I`J��`IW'
'\\"1�/
ej
s�/Ipe! It, � 448
r Q- III I ' � ' •�__ .��9 t/o � � /' o i " � \\I\ � r 3 -
.'- •. • 0 '! �II 2ivoA¢ "(� y6s'o - i I •��p�` \ _���.• ° •
30,1
o
.. / / %`/' "` �, �� __ �� ��d{>\ � '' � �lyq / `�1 •41 �, 123
40 300 ' SB9•SL' 7-W
•w / / I I / ; �� j �-� 15,2�,0�-- _ 3 r. 15,000 -
its
I 3815 Ice s
(p60+ r / /I I , NO cc o M
rf „.'•e' � I I 1 1I I� 1 ! ..}• I /( � �1 � I\ R� � h f 1 Q �.Y r �
,res✓ Do r6rl /!, l7,Soo� !" X15; f�lSo� per` IT�a� � (/ �/tt,V�O� 4C -.. .. _ 13Z
fro
'q. Selo
• �, 3t,woA � � .. Z�,.Iq' 1 ., •Z 12 (C.S:19731• .
��.
a�j,o0o &boo ar 6''00* !.
• T�;r � O� � � � • � • �($Q ( 1 Wed, .. ,• '. .. ', � ' � •
El
i" � �/ .. . �► , • ' ,. p X55.4 .(`, , .. ..,
- l• f". �'
Subdivision No. -7-Zs
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
70: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE : l!- , C'7 Q S ( arl , LAND VALUE:
(By:
Date: )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate a of the land
ElC. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
® land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
;-.�] 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
For otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
F1 6
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
2.
F ; Aa�, , - fa I
. I - r1G_ lawi It I
J¢
T
subdivision
rw=14i
W -1
^---� M
7 1
i
NORMAN=
DALE• - -
PARK -
Brookview Heights 5th Addition
S-77-21
REQUEST NUMBER:
LMATiON= E. of Cahill Rd. & 9 Mile Creek
W. of M.N. & S R.R. tracks &.N of W. 10th
REQUEST: 18 lot single family plat
village planning dWPtm nt YM"e of tditu
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 30, 1977
S-77-21 Brookview Heights 5th Addition.
Refer to: November 2, 1977 Staff Report and excerpts
from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
Overall Plan
The Planning Commission will recall.that the subject subdivision was continued
on November 2, 1977, for consideration of questions raised by surrounding
property owners. Most of these questions concerned the effect of the proposed
subdivision on Nine Mile Creek and its flood plain.
Staff has reviewed these questions and concerns and submits the following
information:
1) Effects upon the Olsen home - 6725 Cahill Road?
The Olsen home was constructed shortly after establishment
of the watershed district and prior to adoption of the City's
flood plain ordinance. Unfortunately, the Olsen home was
constructed about one foot lower than the 100 year flood plain
elevation of Nine Mile Creek. However, Barr Engineering Company,
hydrologists for the. Nine Mile Creek Uatershed District computes
that the proposed Brookview Heights 5th Addition will increase
the flood elevation of Nine Mile Creek by approximately one inch.
Thus, staff concludes that the requested subdivision's effect
on the Olsen home is insignificant.
2) Effect of Highway 100 improvement on flood plain elevations:
Staff has reviewed the plans for Highway 100 improvements.
We find that these improvements have in the past and will in the
future replace obsolete and undersized culverts with larger
culverts. Thus, we believe that flood plain elevations will
decrease rather than increase as a result of these improvements.
Nevertheless, we have requested the watershed district to review
flood plain elevations in the vicinity of 70th Street. However,
we believe that effects of Highway 100 improvements on flood plain
elevations should have no bearing upon the review of Brookview
Heights 5th Addition.
3) Probablity of 200 year rainfall?
We cannot prove statistically that the 200 year rain will
-not happen again for 200 years. Such a rainfall which occurred
on August 30, 1977, could happen again tomorrow. However, the
probability of such an occurrence is statistically shown to occur
once in every 200 }tears. For flood plain management purposes,
the City, the State, the watershed district, and the Federal
Government use the 100 year frequency rainfall as a criterion.
S-77-21
Brookview Heights 5th Addn.
Page 2
November 30, 1977
4) Effect of climate changes on flood plain elevations?
Staff cannot answer this question. We believe a
comprehensive study undertaken at great cost would be necessary
to document such changes in climatic conditions.
5) Effect of "20% encroachment" rule.
Since its creation in 1961, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District has enforced a regulation of allowing only 20%
encroachment into the flood plain. Thus flood plain elevations
which are used by the watershed district and the City assume a total
encroachment or loss of 20% of the flood plain. On past occasions
we have allowed the maximum 20% encroachment on several properties
such as the Wallace. Kenneth property and Fountainwoods apartments.
In many other cases the City and watershed district have approved
developments utilizing less than 20% of the flood plain. Brookview
Heights 5th Addition proposes an encroachment of 13% which is well
below the maximum allowed. The remainder of the flood plain
(4 acres) would be dedicated to the City.
6) The 200 foot wide greenbelt along Nine Mile Creek.
Nine Mile Creek meanders extensively throughout the area
between Valley View Road and 70th Street. As part of previously
approved subdivisions, a 200 wide greenbelt was obtained in the
vicinity of the proposed subdivision. Obviously, the creek does
not run straight through this greenbelt, but meanders from side
to side. Nevertheless, we believe that a green belt of this width
is adequate to protect the natural character of the creek.
Recommendation: On November 2, 1977, staff recommended approval of this
subdivision with some conditions and modifications. Staff continues to
recommend approval. Staff believes this proposal conforms with all City
requirements regarding flood plain management and dedication of parks and
open space lands.
GH: ks
11/23/77
0
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 2, 1977
S-77-21 Brookview Heights 5th Addition. C. Jacobson. Generally
located east of Cahill Rd. and 9 Mile Creek, west of the
M.N. & S. Railroad tracks and north of W. 70th Street (an
extension of Limerick Lane).
Refer to: Attached preliminary plat, grading plan, and
parkland dedication report.
The subject property is a 13 acre tract of land located between the M.N.S.
Railroad tracks and Nine Mile Creek immediately south of W. 66th Street.
An 18 lot single family subdivision is proposed which would be served
by the southerly extension of Limerick Drive. The average lot size for
the subdivision would be 18,700 square feet which is somewhat larger than
existing single family lots located easterly and westerly of the subject
property.
Nearly one half of the subject property lies within the flood plain of
Nine Mile Creek. The proponent has submitted a grading plan for the site
which has been reviewed by staff and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
The Watershed District has indicated that the proposed grading plan complies
with its rules and regulations in that a flood plain encroachment of less
than 20% is proposed. The remaining fl6.od plain lands have been designated
as Outlot A which measures 3.93 acres. The proponent has indicated his
intent to dedicate this outlot to the City. A 200 foot wide strip of
land abutting the west side of the subject property and bisected by Nine
Mile Creek was dedicated to the City in conjunction with a previous
subdivision.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision
and flood plain permit in that:
1) the proposed land use is in conformance with the
Western Edina Plan.
2) lot sizes are generally consistent and somewhat
larger than surrounding subdivisions.
3) proposed flood plain encroachment is within standards
of the City and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
I) a deed to the City of Edina for Outlot A.
2) adequate erosion control measures to prevent sediments
resulting from site grading from entering the flood plain
lands and Nine Mile Creek.
3) those items contained in the attached preliminary
engineering report.
H. Additional Projects
The District will undertake such other projects as are petitioned for,
provided that they are in general conformity with the Overall Plan and in
agreement with the purposes of the District.
S E C T I O N V
BASIC WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
A. General
Increasing urban development may be expected to increase flood problems
in the District. Buildings, streets, parking lots and other impervious
surfaces prevent much of the rainfall from soaking into the ground. Since
storm water is not tolerated, lawns and streets are graded to remove excess
water as quickly as possible. Urbanization also increases the pressure for
development of the remaining open land and hence increases the potential for
flooding.
Presently, runoff water is stored in ponds and depressions in the upper
parts of the watershed. Surface water which reaches the creek spreads over
broad marshes in the flood plain. Regulation and control over these remaining
open lands is needed to prevent the loss of needed water storage sites within
the District.
The Managers recognize the desire to remove storm water from lawns and
streets as quickly as possible, however, the resulting increased flows must
be handled if problems are to be avoided. The District has two choices.
(1) The increased runoff can be rushed toward the outlet without storage.
This method will involve large storm sewers, very large channels and bridges
and extensive erosion control. (2) The second alternative is to reduce the
flood flows by storage in locations where the sites will be an asset to the
community during the long period between floods.
The basic mater management plan for the District seeks to retain and
provide water storage facilities. These water storage facilities unquestionably
are beneficial in controlling the floods and reducing costs of flood control
works. They can also be valuable public assets during the long span of time
between floods. The public, in fact, will be primarily aware of the value
of these facilities in terms of beauty, recreation and parks. Most of the j
water storage sites will be the natural marshes, lakes, ponds and flood plain
which will be retained with little modification. Others will require modifi—
cation to make the storage areas compatible with an urban community and the
land use determinations of the municipalities. The principal features of
the District's basic Water Management Plan are shown on page 22.
B. 105th Street Constriction
The 1600 acres south of the line of 94th Street in Bloomington are
directly tributary to the steep portion of Nine Mile Creek just discussed.
Much of this area is already platted and it is likely that streambank erosion
will occur during the bigger storms. To protect against such conditions,
a constriction should be constructed in the valley near the old mill site at
about 105th Street. This constriction would be of such capacity that it would
have no effect on the normal flows or upon the minor floods which the channel
can handle without erosion. When the channel capacity is exceeded, the con—
striction would back the water up behind a dike and temporarily store the
water in the valley until it can be carried downstream without damage.
C. Marsh Lake Site
The marsh lying east of France Avenue in the vicinity of 94th Street
in Bloomington is the last chance to catch and store the flood water before
it flows into the steep channel descending to the Minnesota River. The Marsh
Lake development is shown on the Water Management Plan and in more detail on
page 23. This project has been completed by the City of Bloomington and the
Watershed District.
In addition to its function as a storm water detention basin, it is
proposed that the area be retained as a wildlife refuge. The Marsh Lake
project represents a conscious effort made early in Bloomington's development
to preserve and utilize a significant natural area of the community. Unless
such an effort is made throughout the District, all of the land will be
covered by artificial works of man and most wildlife will disappear from the
area. If an island of natural wild conditions is to be retained in this
watershed, this location seems most feasible. In addition to its flood water
storage and wildlife value, Marsh Lake will be an area of openness and rustic
beauty.
The land within the 805 foot contour should be retained for storage
purposes. The normal water level has been established at elevation 799.
D. Mount Normandale Lake Site
A 135 acre lake will be created in the Nine Mile Creek Valley just
west of Normandale Avenue in Bloomington. This area is now part of the broad
marsh flood plain. The control structure and dam along Normandale Avenue
are the major construction required. The proposed lake is shown on the
Water Management Plan and in more detail on page 25.
The City of Bloomington and the District have previously cooperated on
a feasibility study of this site. They are presently cooperating on the final
design. The plan shows a normal water level at elevation 810 with an average
depth of six feet. At this elevation, the shores will be steep enough to
minimize problems with aquatic vegetation along the shoreline.
During floods, the lake level will rise, storing excess waters, then
fall as the water is slowly released into the creek downstream. On the average
of once in 100 years, it is expected to rise about four feet to elevation 814.
E. Mud Lake Site
The marsh area lying between Vernon Avenue and Crosstown Highway 62 is
an ideal site for flood water storage. A meandered lake known as Mud Lake
makes up most of the marsh. Several alternatives were set forth in a detailed
report prepared by the District for the Village of Edina. These include
continuation as a marsh, or constructing dikes between small knolls and across
Nine Mile Creek to enlarge Mud Lake.
The site is shown on the Water Management Plan and in more detail on
page 27. This plan shows the site as a natural area.
If a lake is developed, the normal water level will be about elevation
860 with a maximum water depth of 14 feet, an average depth of S� feet and a
lake area of approximately 120 acres. The shoreline will be steep enough to
minimize trouble with aquatic vegetation. During floods the lake level will
rise to store excess water until it can flow slowly out into the creek down-
stream. A rise of 3' feet in the lake level is expected to occur on the average
of once in 100 years.
At the proposed normal level of elevation 860 the lake will back up a
short distance north of Vernon Avenue.
F. Smetana Lake
The South Fork of Nine Mile Creek flows through a small lake west of
County Road 18 known locally as Smetana Lake. It has deep open water in the
center and a broad fringe of marsh around the edge. This lake can be improved
by raising the water level approximately four feet to about elevation 838 by
constructing a dam in the outlet channel. This would bring the water level
up against the steeper slopes of the surrounding hillsides. An additional
advantage is that it makes possible a diversion to Anderson Lakes if such a
diversion proves desirable or feasible as a means of maintaining the level of
Anderson Lakes and Bush Lake.
G. Anderson and -Bush Lakes
The principal concern in the Anderson and Bush Lake area is the stabil-
ization of the lake levels. The District in cooperation with the City of
Bloomington and the Hennepin County Park Reserve District has completed a
study to determine the recommended outlet size and location, for each of the
lakes. This study recommended that the Bush Lake well be used as the primary
source of water if lake augmentation is considered necessary to maintain
satisfactory water levels.
H. Flood Plain Zonin^
To alleviate flood damages there should be a combination of structural r
i
t
f
26
Sworks and regulations of developments in the flood plain. Buildings and other
valuable improvements which can be damaged by water should not be built in
areas reached by flood waters. To insure that such is the case, the District
has established flood zones in which construction is restricted. Maps of the
flood plain have been made available to all municipalities. State law requires
-the adoption of municipal flood plain and shoreland ordinances.
Platting and development are encroaching into the flood plain area of
Nine Mile Creek. Flood zones to regulate development cannot, however, be
precisely determined until the flood control facilities are planned in detail.
To permit some balance between regulation and planning, a relatively conserva-
tive flood zone has been established along the main channel as part of this
Overall Plan. The Flood Plain I-:ap is shown on page 29.
I. Phase I. Flood Zone - Overall Plan
The flood zone elevations at various points along .the creek are shown
on the profile on page 30. No improvements which can be damaged by water will
be permitted below the indicated elevation. Since many of the proposed
storage basins are not yet constructed, the natural marshes are the principal
means of flood protection. Accordingly, the net encroachment onto the flood
plain will be restricted to 20 percent or less of the flood plain area of the
parcel being considered for development. If filling is requested as part of
a municipal public land development plan around the Marsh Lake, Mount
Normandale Lake and Mud Lake sites, it may be permitted on lands outside the
limits of the proposed lakes upon a showing of public necessity.
J. Phase II. Flood Zone - Detailed Design
Detailed design of the basic water management system will permit re-
finement of the flood zone elevations. It also provides information for deter-
mination of the right-of-way required for the creek and storage sites and the
sizes of culverts and bridges.
The detailed design will provide a reliable, workable framework for
planning and platting of adjoining property. The restrictions on encroachments
upon the flood plain will be determined as part of the detailed design. The
Managers believe that the enforcement of the building restrictions protecting
the flood zones can best be accomplished by the municipalities, through their
building, zoning and platting ordinances and the flood plain and shorelands
ordinances to be adopted.
K. Phase III Flood Zone- Basic Water Management Facilities
After the basic water management facilities are constructed in accord-
ance with the detailed plan prepared in Phase II, the flood zones will be
subject to modification and some of the land in the flood plain may be avail-
able for development. Building must still be restricted below the new flood
zone elevation.
.S E C T I 0 N VI
ENGINEERING DATA
A. County Ditches
At present there are three county ditches in the District. The loca-
tion of these three ditches are shown on page 1,2. Pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 112.65, the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County
has transferred jurisdiction over the county ditches to the Managers. County
Ditch 1 forms the main channel of Nine Mile Creek through the marshes in
Bloomington beginning at the junction of the North and South Forks and ending
just south of 98th Street. As part of the Marsh Lake project, a dam was
placed in County Ditch 1 for water control and maintenance purposes, in
accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 106. County Ditch 34 begins at
Birch Island Lake and joins the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek at Bryant Lake.
County Ditch 41 forms the channel of the North Fork near the southeast corner
of Hopkins. It extends approximately one-sixth of a mile on the west side
of County Road 18 and three-fourths of a mile on the east side.
B. Storm Sewers
Approximately one-half of the watershed is storm severed. The
Watershed District has reviewed the storm sewers that have been constructed
since the adoption of the Overall Plan. This review has been concerned with
31
Subdivision No. - 7-Z
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION FYPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Depart—
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE:
(BY
LAND VALUE:
Date: )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
ElA. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate n % of the land
j� C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
Asa result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
10 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
o so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
0 5. If the property is a place of significant natural., scenic or his-
toric value.
11 6.
B. Cash Required
El1. In all other instances than above.
EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1977 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
BRAEMAR
Batting Cage
S 1,500
Update electrical at Pavilion
2,500
Park Storage Area
12,000
LAKE EDINA
Regrade, seed two fields
6,000
3 foot fence along water
1,000
5 foot fence - South Field
2,500
MC GUIRE
Regrade and seed
2,500
Top Soil
Backstop
1,500
HIGHLANDS
Tennis Court - Resurface
3,500
CREEK VALLEY
Tennis Court - resurface
3,500
ART CENTER
5,000
CORNELIA SCHOOL
Regrade - seed
3,000
Irrigate
7,000
Hockey Lights
5,000
COUNTRYSIDE
Seal and color coat hard surface area
2,000
PAMELA
Irrigate Soccer Field
3,500
New Electrical Panel Building-
1,000
ARNESON ACRES
Build Green House
8,000
WALNUT RIDGE
Planting
500
Parking Area
1,500
GARDEN
Irrigate Fields
8,000
Grade - seed new soccer field
3,500
Fence
4,000
Seal and Color Coat [lard Surface
1,000
BIRCHCREST
Backstop
1,500
MIRROR LAKES
Plans
1,500
CEMETERY
Plans
3,500
CAHILL - DEWEY HILL ROAD*
Plans
3,500
SUB TOTAL $ 99,500
(OVER)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT
CHOWEN PARK
Playground Equipment $ 2,500
PARBURY
Plans
Plantings
Equipment 11,500
TUPA PARK (Historical Center)
Basement Refurbishing
Flag Pole 8,000
SUB TOTAL $ 22,000
TOTAL
*If funds from Developer of Indian Meadows becomes available, construction
could begin in 1977. This amount is $50,000.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
Budgeted Capital Improvements $80,000
• Developers Fund 20,000
Community Development Funds 22,000
TOTAL $122,000
$121,500