The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1976-07-13 Park Board PacketPARK BOARD MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 13, 1976 7:30 PM EDINA CITY HALL 0 CITY OF EDINA EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT AGENDA I. Approval of Minutes - Tuesday, June 8, 1976 ll. Planning Request - S-76-13 III. Planning Request - S-76-14 IV. Planning Request - S-76-15 V. Planning Request - S-76-16 VI. Park Name Recommendations VII. Recreation Report L Z AN,Y cr subdivision REQUEST NUMBER: S-76-16 W of Olinger Road, S of Vernor LOCATION: Avenue, E of Blake Ridge REQUEST: 4 lot single family subdivision. it SAI MET SIDE ELEME vill ire planning department vinare of edirm EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 7, 1976 S-76-16 Robert Middlemist 2nd Addition. Generally located west of Olinger Road, south of Vernon Avenue, and east of the Blake Ridge townhouses. Refer to: Attached survey and area map. The proponents are requesting to subdivide a portion of property located behind two single family homes which face easterly onto Olinger Road. The proposed lots would vary in size from 12,000 to 16,240 square feet. The lots in the neighborhood average about 20,000 square feet. However, none of these lots are recent subdivisions. Those lots in the nearby area which have been platted in the last ten years average about 12,000 to 15,000 square feet. The proposed configuration of this plat allows for future divisions by adjacent owners without having to create neck lots or other odd -shaped lots. The staff would recommend approval of the proposed lot division contingent on: 1. submission of a 5% cash donation in lieu of parkland dedication; 2. The developer must enter into and receive approval of a Developer's Agreement. GL:ln 7/2/76 LIN 54f, r`� 1 I• e = f N �• P t srb 076 — m ( ly y '� N 1 7f iib— _ — _ _ — — Aj pN J, AW /.%.r Jj• awl +eye_ \ \ ' PC '52 , � I I or +� mAj O 1 \ W 7µ.,i \ \ o � J Ai viL i o � • N �ob N r 7�6 \ 'O og PC '52 I or +� mAj O 1 \ W Ai viL i o � • N �ob y 'O og I •wb . d iIi9 / —768 P-1 4c'M 2144 088 Pur yt— alir/rd 7.1 o" • �2 � b Subdivision No. S-76-16 SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME:Ro�ir SUtlIV ., LAND SIZE: 96 714 O LAND VALUE: (BY:-� Date: The developer of this subdivision has been required to E3 A. grant an easement over part of the land [� B. dedicate % of the land C. donate $ ® as a fee in lieu of land as a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) [] 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. EJ 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. [E4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place. EJ 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. WE B. Cash Required Kl. In all other instances than above. 2. I• MAP LOCATION �� . - � •. ��ii►,� ► „�� gip". I� mo ► R: subdivision REQUEST NUMBER: S-76-15 W of Olinger Road and N of LOCATION: Olinger Boulevard REQUEST: 4 lot single family subdivision. URI COUNTRY ; SIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL', yillame planning department village of edini EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 7, 1976 S-76-15 Deer Run. Generally located west of Olinger Road and north of Olinger Boulevard. Refer to: Attached location map and survey. The proponents are requesting to subdivide a presently unplatted piece of property into four single family lots. The property lies immediately north of a portion of Bredesen Park which lies outside of the park perimeter lot. The lot sizes in the neighborhood are extremely varied but average about 15,000 square feet. The proposed lot sizes range from two lots at about 14,000 square feet to one lot in excess of 55,000 square feet. As can be seen on the attached survey, the proponents are requesting to plat the two larger lots so that a long neck of land provides access to each lot from Olinger Road. In one instance this neck would be 245 feet long by 22 feet wide. The staff consistently discourages this kind of platting, however, in the broadest sense of the regulations these lots do meet our ordinances and in this instance the property would be impossible to develop in another manner. Of utmost importance, the property does have direct access to a public street so that fire and police as well as water and sewer problems will not be created. The greatest question the staff has is where the front and rear yards would be in these types of lots. It is the staff's opinion that this should be identified at the time of platting and held to when the developer seeks a building permit. Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of assuming a conclusion by the Planning Commission of the lot" matter. Approval is recommended for the following the proposed subdivision above dis reasons: The request is in conformance with the Western Edina Plan and be adviseable to use the property for single family purposes delaying approvals and causing future owners to request incre Approval should be granted with the following conditions: 1. Th cash parkland dedication be submitted; 2. that a Developer's Agr submitted and approved by the Engineering Department; and 3. that developer identify the front yard of the two proposed "neck lots" GL:ln 7/2/76 4 !7S eg 'm's, JV L00"CATION MAP FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF o ` O tom. 60.89 .�. % CPs o a 1:4 a6 HS 9s e O O a`u l'., 3 4 ~�Ale,6� fi o d 4. i 3 : Q; Quo j I p ��.��., 5;�, 90:-[ AL 9S 75 `+- RIVE :v I Yv 4 5 nr' -'y C''®� SS�Jop '.r�,+: `Z.d ; WQI L 90 1� 90 90 9J 6� . l'90pp � 2.� ADD o e r � Hy"S.? F. O C• ,., / •.,v c ,o v. a. ¢/8.99 N 8Y`.fi E 58.7 &�y..� L 0/W,OOO 'W o H:;. 69a,1 �.1, lk iciA ro �'Zi 900 //�3cp _. ,nv' �• 'b' _� 1b!i y'y\.r• moi-.. .4'Lf :i"•►� • r;r ..__-�';---•-- - ,� 1 .r r• Il Y_p1. 9 4Z7d .tR. mac; ,ZI 12 -'.�r5 01 • 0,- 4q . C, ty i:.., r„� �wl D I ,_ •� wd'1•°I'%� '`' eo 6p d .. 7>07 ':' ,:.: lvk+ J1 �2` OQ 0 14 100''`'x' �/ k�,, ,�� •A X21 ,FaS)—. ..14; •r 1e7� ':! l Ary 9ej JS t o avo r . 166 �b ��1L,., y1 y .•.a,J \ a :SGEr v I . - - -• J ,Tr �_ ►.. 17 EDINIV,144 G ILA�� -IDS" s f: —J 16 15 14 i3 1 go S T F .. aT ,•Vol/ :.�� P W 44 t �'J i'v �-'`q•ff 1:°14 "`r 80 15L'n1•, rv.�`,o. 'C�v�Gr �''' ' I 1 I o_ .:•.M n, -.;•oma ; ; ; �� M,' e ! T :I 6 v �1�:=:. _ N. :�e �c� It Arlt ,,, .� y GRbVE. ;6 i n .5�•.5�..�5.` o ` O tom. 60.89 .�. % CPs o a 1:4 a6 HS 9s e O O a`u l'., 3 4 ~�Ale,6� fi o d 4. i 3 : Q; Quo j I p ��.��., 5;�, 90:-[ AL 9S 75 `+- RIVE :v I Yv 4 5 nr' -'y C''®� SS�Jop '.r�,+: `Z.d ; WQI L 90 1� 90 90 9J 6� . l'90pp � 2.� ADD o e r � Hy"S.? F. O C• ,., / •.,v c ,o v. a. ¢/8.99 N 8Y`.fi E 58.7 &�y..� L 0/W,OOO 'W o H:;. 69a,1 �.1, lk iciA ro �'Zi 900 //�3cp _. ,nv' �• 'b' _� 1b!i y'y\.r• moi-.. .4'Lf :i"•►� • r;r ..__-�';---•-- - ,� 1 .r r• Il Y_p1. 9 4Z7d .tR. mac; ,ZI 12 -'.�r5 01 • 0,- 4q . C, ty i:.., r„� �wl D I ,_ •� wd'1•°I'%� '`' eo 6p d .. 7>07 ':' ,:.: lvk+ J1 �2` OQ 0 14 100''`'x' �/ k�,, ,�� •A X21 ,FaS)—. ..14; •r 1e7� ':! l Ary 9ej JS t o avo r . 166 �b ��1L,., y1 y .•.a,J \ a :SGEr v I . - - -• J ,Tr �_ ►.. cwsr 30 '15 0 3LJF—I 0 N �` � \ \♦ �\ . _ — — — — —POND — _ , � �\ 111 GST i Subdivision No. S — T6 — bS SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: t)Go' R ✓ N LAND SIZE:_ IaD LAND VALUE: vvv (By: ; Date: %-6- 76 ) 5%=$aa°� The developer of this subdivision has been required to [[A. grant an easement over part of the land [1B. dedicate % of the land C. donate $ aZ 9S �•� as a fee in lieu of land as a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50110 of land dedicated) [[1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition .beneficially expands the park. [� 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. p3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. [] 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged or otherwise improved and will be a'scenic place. [� 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. M B. Cash Required X1. In all other instances than above. [ 2. . L,0CA"d'101O' 0 z MC C uL - EY TRA1L M ES7 r !4 CROSSVIEW�----�� IUTHERAN CHURCH �—�_ subdivisiol-I x IFIH SIRCU[ N NI REQUEST NUMBER: S-76-14 E of McCauley Trail, S of LOCATION: McCauley Ln. & N of Margaret' REQUEST: 3 lot single family subdi- vision. village Planning department village of edina EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 7, 1976 S-76-14 McCauley Heights 6th Addition. Generally located east of McCauley Trail, south of McCauley Lane and north of Margaret's Lane. Refer to: Attached survey and area map. The proponents are requesting to subdivide another small portion of their property into three more lots. The lot sizes vary from 13,400 square feet to 19,000 square feet. These lot sizes are in general conformance to the lot sizes in the neighborhood. All of the lots could have direct access onto Margaret's Lane. Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of the proposed plat contingent on: 1. submission and approval of a Developer's Agreement; 2. The dedication of 5% of the raw land value for parks. GL:ln 7/2/76 J ', Po►1 of Port 0 n Lot S '. J 31 / ? '�P, LANE f . - nRT LOT 4QQ• 4, `• 'j•�.r f �(� u `^� ,� it `,f ' d' 110 • - I- rte• 10 alt l� p �'� E� M� C•,�'` �}-.i 3 �3� +fir i f �g f . _ f s •; ;1. N7 14, a r r104 Ap_�,u, 2�S j• HEIOHTS JRA •i MctrRUl�y'' �AT10N t.. Z 2 l�Sv[-• •..,,.. � 1•.,�Ii fib'", � c T1i0 ti � • • v. o NcC1!UIJL LOT f H . O A 15'` w if v s�s�i -�cj E �i c;r 2' .. .. rs Z `s r a, oG F`� co 2 t /Sr 1, , .. �•' ' r, a -•.3 n;,D.� � ccot�.lD•- s � � ,y �'�. �3• ,, o � t , + J 411 ►t�' 3 `Ot Sf 101' I•Kh lil.,'�.•. � ." 1 �O.Y•/ r�.'.�. � D�) � ,'. �` �: .-'��1,. t' •�1 Q�. •. �%%'4'<... � .S' _. .�. Oe '1 r(.• _ ._y:::i�... Lot areas in proposed Mc Cauley Heights 6th Addition. Lot 1 19,000 square feet Lot 2 - 15, 300 square feet Prepared by: Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. Lot 3 - 13,400 square feet Surveyors Outlot A - 84,000 square feet Total Area - 3 acres I I t Lf A; IJ •JJ'I7'N -- r 5{ / llil,t 1' %iE/U7i TS . , ,:A Iy. '" : .' :/<, r..r ..✓ P.,D Aon/7/0A' ifi %T E BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED _ u DENOTES TON MONUMENT 0' - - ao - — 100 150 goo ISO ., V � t. Nt uuLLr NL/6N7J erN t00/neN Ne�� B,—h Ar,,A+Tri Hnrir rI ' nvN° N M� /erlrrd "I. 7.f ,%,,I�' K fJ'Jl'II^E. /irw. rhe e/y/e `i��. Po.nr•n rhe Ne.fh /%ne r/ '/ ee 4 �" Y L•r r, L/ rel:rn IIIol A— 0 see AYre/ Y/uffl .U/ e y t IS 4S r��-1 2 � � \ ,.off. `, (qN \•\ �.t;/ r/! %,.L T '1 ! �Ci'• / J J� •�.•r1 ` .[... f arArNl /rwe rr Wil. ��^%� / J ITN .f00/r/qy .,, ,L 01"A a •>! ,<` `t. \V• f., ' NrrfArrrrf r..n BLIGN I Nr, NE/a/r/J la'O n2oPos�o!H MC C.4 UL E Y PE/G1-%l5 ,4D,91T/0n1 AND DEVEIOvEk: Belly 1. r,ra l!ny SURVEYOR AND DESIGNER: Egan, Field &Novak, Inc. AX17M'C•:•:! ; Tr-il Surveyors Edina, Mlnnesnta 7415 Wayzata Boulevard 941-1517 Minneapolis, hiN 55426 546-6837 NOTE: Touryaphicdala taken from W. P. A. survey. DESCRIPTION: Oullol A, McCAULEY HEIGHTS 5111 ADDITION. I hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my rirect supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stctc •f Minnesota. Dated this 15th rfay of June, 1976. EGAN, FIELD &NOWAK, INC. Surveyors d 11r1e;Ota Vojistrat Ion lln. 6177 I' Lf A; IJ •JJ'I7'N -- r 5{ / llil,t 1' %iE/U7i TS . , ,:A Iy. '" : .' :/<, r..r ..✓ P.,D Aon/7/0A' ifi %T NrriArr/r r.,.., . tri ��wa Nr CAULlY NE/<:M,J n2oPos�o!H MC C.4 UL E Y PE/G1-%l5 ,4D,91T/0n1 AND DEVEIOvEk: Belly 1. r,ra l!ny SURVEYOR AND DESIGNER: Egan, Field &Novak, Inc. AX17M'C•:•:! ; Tr-il Surveyors Edina, Mlnnesnta 7415 Wayzata Boulevard 941-1517 Minneapolis, hiN 55426 546-6837 NOTE: Touryaphicdala taken from W. P. A. survey. DESCRIPTION: Oullol A, McCAULEY HEIGHTS 5111 ADDITION. I hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my rirect supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stctc •f Minnesota. Dated this 15th rfay of June, 1976. EGAN, FIELD &NOWAK, INC. Surveyors d 11r1e;Ota Vojistrat Ion lln. 6177 I' n 0 Subdivision No. S -- 74 -/4 SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: �1e qeltiz�ts 6 a WJ."000 � v LAND SIZE: 700 LAND VALUE: Z7Qnc) CL,r-s !--- ; cLz Jf (By: P -� _ Date: 1C -7( 5% _ $ I J So , The developer of this subdivision has been required to [] A. grant an easement over part of the land ❑ B. dedicate % of the land KC. donate $ 1 5 -) d• as a fee in lieu of land as a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. If property is necessary for storm water holding or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place If the property is a place of significant natura value. B. Cash Required �1. In all other instances than above. ❑ 2. LOC--`�AT ION ST• ALBAN � 0 EPIS OPl1L ?A iY C P i1i��y}yy1 W 1 w IR00 OIS - z � IL a 1 J CI C E i-. CNE E C� CLE ST. PATRI CATHOLIC a O o < = r ¢ G\ , 0 a Y v o ¢ S a s AR SCOTIA �.9 h T U V H < Z } W a 3 u W IR U u / BRAEBUR CR ¢ v ti r � I i� c• , D R N `I4�?`BRAEMAR r3�3.j;;:2� BLVD. +' ^ A I A j subdivision REQUEST NUMBER: S-76-13 E of Valley View Road at LOCATION: the end of Moccasin Valley R REQUEST: 3 lot single family subdivis villaze Planvillage of edins EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 7, 1976 S-76-13 Wright's Addition. Generally located east of Valley View Road at the end of Moccasin Valley Road. Refer to: Attached survey. The proponents are requesting to subdivide an unplatted lot. with an existing single family home into three lots as shown on the attached survey. The lot sizes in the neighborhood range from 13,775 square feet to approximately 20,000 square feet. The proponent's lot sizes will be 15,500 square feet, 17,855 square feet, and the existing home site will be 25,700 square feet. The neighbor immediately to the east of the proponent is proposing to bring in a subdivision at the next Planning Commission meeting which is, in the staff's opinion, a logical extension of this subdivision. At that time additional right of way will be dedicated for Moccasin Valley Road. • Presently, however, proposed lot 3 of this addition will not have access to Mocassin Valley Road. Recommendation: The staff would recommend that the proposed subdivision be approved with the condition that lot 3 not be granted a building permit until the remainder of Moccasin Valley Road is platted. This recommendation is made for the following reasons: 1. The proposal is in conformance with the Southwest Edina Plan. 2. The lot sizes conform to those established in the neighborhood. 3. The subdivision dedication report will be submitted to the Planning Commission at the meeting Wednesday night because Mr. Swanson, the City Assessor, is out of town and was not available to calculate the raw land value. GL:ln 7/2/76 40 Subdivision No. 5-76-13 SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department s SUBDIVISION NAME: tY S q ^0, o 1* LAND VALUE: Z-7060 LAND SIZE: �s Date: 7-6 -76 ABY: 5% _ $ � SDI - The developer of this subdivision has been required to [JA. grant an easement over part of the land dedicate of the land donate $ 135 -0. --as a fee in lieu of land as a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) [] 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. [:12. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 113. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. [] 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place. [J 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. [] 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. ❑ 2•