HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-09-10 Park Board PacketCITY OF EDINA
PARK BOARD MEETING
September RO, 1974
AGENDA
I. Approval of !Minutes - Park Board Meeting Juty 9, 1974
It. Request for Braemar Arena Season Ticket -r Mark Frederick
1,10. Reservation Poiicy of the Golf Course
Letter from Shirley Knutson
IV. Cooperative Agreement between School District and
CIty of Edina regarding Community Education
V. Operating Budget
VI. Capital Improvements Budget
Vil. Planning Request S--74-10
Vill. Planning Request S-74-11
APEL HIL
GA710NAL
t Z/ �11
,rcA(� WEST
t]UTHERAN CHURCH.
S14 -A, b divi Ss�s�
REQUEST NUMBER:
S-74-10
Northwest corner of Gleason
LOCATION: Rd. & the Crosstown Hig1hway
REQUEST:
plat.
44 unit planned residential
V -L" 'PdRK• • _ "
CREEK VALLEY
ELEM. SCHOOL
Village plunnia n�,;�i Viiiage ni a -iii
EDINA PLANNING COMMIISSION
STAFF REPORT
July 31, 1974
i
S-74-10 (Subdivision) and Z-74-9 (Zoning): The Windings by Partnership
Investments of Minnesota, Inc. Generally located at the northwest
corner of Gleason Road and the Crossto M Highway.
Refer to: Reduced copy of subdivision, folded copy of site plan,
and letter of request from the developer.
Request: R-4 Multiple Residence District to PRD -3 Planned
Residential District.
The proponents are requesting to rezone a piece o= property from R-4 nult=nle
residential district, with deed restrictions liniting the number of units to
845 to a PRD -3 District condominium type development, as shown on the attached
site plan.
The staff has been working for some time with the developers and is strongly in
favor of such a zoning modification. The develoaers have had a meeting wi,-h
is the neighborhood, and they reported that the nei-hborhood concensus is generally
favorable.
Zoning Recommendation: The staff would there -fore recom:iend approval of the concept
for rezoning contingent on an approved subdivis_on for the following reasons:
1. The rezoning is a down zoning.
2. The structures are more residential and blend better with the residential
quality of the Viking Hills area.
3. The use is consistent with the Western Edina Land Use Plan.
Subdivision Recommendation: The staff would recommend aDoroval of the subdivision
contingent on:
1. A 5% cash parkland dedication in the amount of $7,000.
GL:ln
• 7/25/74
M
>- LLI 72--
0- ;;;_, Ld C)
CD CD
C-3 ca
Ca-
LLJ Q C:) :B:
CD V) Of
U3
-r- Cl 2::
LLJ ZZ H
Ld
F-
= _j
w --3
ia_
C:)
M: CD Ld C-)
CD Lij LLI
�4 Lij
F- W
Z-' 0- UJ 2:
HN =) Ld M
La CY I-- =)
= uj Q V)
V)
LiJ Co LL!
= UF- - =) =
F- CD V) CL I--
cu
Li!
co
��f
I w„�
F� CD
'�'.:
>
>- LLI 72--
0- ;;;_, Ld C)
CD CD
C-3 ca
Ca-
LLJ Q C:) :B:
CD V) Of
U3
-r- Cl 2::
LLJ ZZ H
Ld
F-
= _j
w --3
ia_
C:)
M: CD Ld C-)
CD Lij LLI
�4 Lij
F- W
Z-' 0- UJ 2:
HN =) Ld M
La CY I-- =)
= uj Q V)
V)
LiJ Co LL!
= UF- - =) =
F- CD V) CL I--
S--:!)�ivi sion iio.
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission,
FROM: Planning Department j
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND VALUE:
5%=$ -70 oD
S --7q-10
The developer of this subdivision has been recu_„ed to
E]A. grant an easement over part off the lamd
B. dedicate % of the lard
C. donate $ 7 d C' as a fee in lieu of land
as a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intens:
may be use3 for the first 5° of
land dedicated)
F] .1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be corbired with future ded_cations
so that the end result will be a 7'nimum of a 6 acre park.
FJ 3. If property abuts a natural la'.ke, pond, or stream.
F] 4. If property is necessary =or sto= water holding and will be
dredged or otherwise improved a^.-= will be a scenic place.
5. If the property is a place o- si:F�nificant natural, scenic or
historic value.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances that: a` o --e.
® 2.
W1
1-.d-* C
.,,ATI -ON MAP
i
2
4
subdivrisaon
a
"'� C4ULEY
TRAM WESr
CROSSVVEW
LUTHERAN CHURCH
i
i
�
I L •':::_:; `•vie,.•
IgD1A
o HS
�P y CIP.CLC
g
Qp
REQUEST NUMBER: S-74-9
Between McCauley Trail & A.rrc a^e<
LOCATION:La;<e, 11 of Margaret's Lane & S o'
McCaulev Circle.
REQUEST:
Three lot single family subdivision
v_illl! e planning delartmrlit vin eof edlna
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
1
July 31, 1974
S-74-9 McCauley Heights 5th Addition. Generally located between McCauley Trail
and Arrowhead Lake, north of Margaret's Lane and south of McCauley Circle.
Refer to: 6-26-74 Planning Commission staff report and minutes.
The staff and many of the Planning Commission members have had an opportunity to
walk this site, and any of you who drove up the easement as I did found it was
impossible to turn around unless you either pulled into someone's garage or
backed out. A visual inspection has only recon -firmed my opinion that the request
is dangerous and unacceptable.
I requested the Traffic Safety Committee to review the proposal, and they
recommended unanimously that public street access to all of the lots in McCauley
Heights 5th Addition be provided for emergency access and public safety. The
Fire Chief is strongly opposed to this proposal. Emergency services (ambulances
and police) indicated that it would cause dela;: and recommended against it.
Recommendation: For the reasons stated in the 6-26-74 staff report, the staff
would recommend denial.
GL:ln
7/26/74
EDINA PLANNING CO,%'.ISSION
STAFF P.EPORT
June 26, 1974
s
1
5-74-9 McCauley Heights 5th Addition. Generally located between McCa,^iey
Trail and Arrowhead Lake, north of Margaret's Lane and south of
McCauley Circle.
Refer to: Attached site graphics by proponent and by staff.
The proponents are requesting a three lot subdivision with an outlot, generally
between McCauley Trail and Arrowhead Lake. The wide black border on attached
graphic "A" shows the exact location of those three lots. In meeting with the
Engineering Department it became clear that from an engineering, planni^g, and
hic "A" shows
safety standpoint, the proposal is unacceptable. Grap
the future division of Outlot A, and in pink shows the proposed access to all
of the lots. The commission should note that the access is by private easement.
Graphic "B" is a drawing by the Planning staff showing the method by which
public access could be had into the area. =ne staff proposal may very well not
environmental havoc.
be the best proposal, in that it creates considerable
It is, however, one workable solution.
Recommendation: That the proposed plat be denied iB its present form for the
following reasons:
1. The deadend private access drives are both inconvenient and potentially
dangerous for fire and emergency vehicles.
2. Post office vehicles, garbage truc}:s, delivery vans, etc., will also find
it difficult to maneuver.
3. Safety service and/general public would find dificulty in locatir_7 these
homes, resulting both in a frustrated driving public and disturbances to
adjoining residents who will be asked to identify the locations o: these
future homes.
1+. .'Acceptable maintenance standards with so fear homes (unli}:e a townhouse develop-
ment) will be difficult and inay very well result in public demand __lay ,a._
municipality provide those public works services.
Should the Planning Commission choose to an^rove this su5division, it should ie
subject to a 5s cash parkland dedication.
GL: In
6/21/74
Sti)division 2Jo. v T �4_t
—
SUBDIVISION DEDICATIOPi ?-ORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission,
FROM: Planning Department le-V
SUBDIVISION NAME:JA-C, `� 1-4
t' 6
LAPID VALUE: $` Q J 3 ( d
/-
5% = $ 15'_ 7
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the la -d
B. dedicate o of the land
[YC. donate $ % �' a as a fee 'n lieu o- land
as a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
land dedicated)
F1 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum o= a 6 acre park
❑ 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm_ nater holding and will be
dredged or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place.
5. If the property is a place of si=_nificant natural, scenic or
historic value.
•
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
GOLF COURSE FUND
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
QTY OF EDINA
For Eight Months Ending August 31, 1974
REVENUE
Membership fees
Green fees
18 hole
9 hole
Par 3
Golf car and cart rental
Locker rental
Other
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administration:
Salaries and wages.
Manager
Pro
Rangers and starters
Cashiers and clerical
Printing
Supplies
Insurance and alarm system
Retirement, insurance, office
supplies, etc.
Mileage and school
Other
Audit
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
Building - clubhouse and pro shop
Salaries and wages
Telephone
Water
Fuel
Light and power
Laundry
Less amount charged to grill
Repair - building
Insurance
Supplies
Other
TOTAL EUILDING - CLUBHOUSE
AND PRO SHOP
Increase
1974_ 1871 Decrease!
$ 23,530
$
$ 22,602
$ 928
71,997
75,219
3,222*
43,010
43,019
4,991
27,612
27,484
128
19,322
17,723
1,599
1,334
933
351
2,183
973
1&0
-�-FqC-fi8'__.___._
$-T66,- dd3 - ..
-_'1'85-
'-$ - - G,-1'85 -
$ a,520
7,830
$
G90
2,000
2,000
-
5,342
4,723
619
1,454
3,910
2,456*
1,219
1,776
557*
515
139
776
442
730
288-''
10020
9,360
960
113
250
137,-*
220
1,404
1,100
950950
-
-62'ff -
10,071
5,267
4,304
332
904
72*
31,
31
3
586
799
213*
5,074
2,611
2,463
287
266
21
2,043
1,383
660
2,064
5,015
2,950
336
338
2*
1,565
2,301
736*
91
356
26.5*
$ 18,897
$
16,505
$
2,392 --
-2 -
OPER AT1111"I EXPEIISES (Cont'd)
Maintenance of f-.oursc and grcunds.,
&jjaries and viages:
Superintendent
Ma 7 ntenance
Telcphone
Light and power
Fuel
Fertilizer and themical
Sand, graval and rock
Nacktop an j' a5pha1t
Sod, tree teplacement, etc.
Lumber
(lepa i rs
Supplies
Equipment op,,�-atlon
() ther
YOTAL MAINTENANCE - COURSE
MD GRC-UNDS
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
Income on h-west.ments
111-4. income - opera".Ing departments
P!(',0i1E BEFORE INTEREST AND DEPR1FC1&",M
l erzzt on bonds
Interest on lom - Liquor Fund
TOTAL INTEREST
ENCOME BEFORE DEPRECIATION
Pi-tL-lislon for deptcia;tion
NET IMMIE (LOSS)
Increase
1974 1973 Decrease*
$ 9,3915
$ 8,579
$ M
35,512__
35,953
4146*
T 4V -,_9C -I7W,-fff
X70
172
200
28*
385
2,893
2,508*
525
259
266
3,171
5.2,302*
,473
501
251
250
82.,0
1:49
381
:,697
2,188
491*
1,238
727
511
3,158
3,8118
690*
3, 91
3,491
10 , 31, 60
9,8000
1480
---..514
.- ---437-
- .77-
$ 70,649 74,633 $ 3,934*
321 I-OTf IYT Y'-il gff
LfOT
61i,7z3 6,
3,665
2V659
1,006
17,466 17,057
-9-4 �"Y§ r, - — - -'61- - ' - tc' 59
429
$
13,264
'13,992
5,77-0
5,720
-0-
$ 75,314 $
64,70
$ 10,567
----6 2'624
6,968
- ---31:4-,
S90� $ 57�,779 $ 10,911
A
GOLF COURSE FUND (OPEWING DEPARTMENTS)
STATEMENT OF WCOViE AND EXPENSE
CITY OF EDINA
For Eight Months Ending August 31, 1574
Increase
1974 1073 Decrease*
RAE:
AV G E ------
Income $ 25,170 $ 23,021 2,1949
Less operating expenses 10,835 8,315 2,520
GRI LL:
I n come
Food
Beverage
Other
Less operating expenses:
Personal services
Contractual services
Commodities
HET V -)COME -GRILL.
NET INCOME - OPErATING DEPAWMENTS
$ 29,972
$
200,207
$
765
12,957
12,405
552
203
533
330*
3 2
$ 14,915
$
14,011
$
904
3,783
3,167
616
2-1 -ni
22,610'
1,333*
$$
187
$ 3,151
2,3511
-8-6d
$_J7,436
$
17,057
$
1,29
ni ni
A,3 1, Jllll-� U,
V
14
REQUEST NUMBER: S-74-11
SE corner of Interlachen
LOCATION: Blvd. E Schaerr PJ.
REQULST: 3 lot sin, -le. family
SUDkI.I.V-sion
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 4, 1974
S-74-12 Christine Manor. Generally located at the southeast corner of
Interlachen Boulevard and Schaefer Road.
Refer to: Survey.
The proponents are requesting a subdivision for the area heavily outlined on
the attached drawing. That attached drawing also shows the size of the
surrounding lots. The southerlymost lot has already received a lot division
and the northerlymost lot is the lot on which the existing homesite is located.
Thus, the proponents are essentially requesting the creation of the center lot.
It should be noted that the subdivision requirements allow only one lot
division per tract of land, thus when this proponent requested an additional
lot division, he was instructed he must subdivide.
The Planning staff sees no difficulty with creating a .96 acre lot in this
particular area and would recommend approval contingent on a 5a cash parkland
dedication,
This recommendation is tempered, however, by the fact •that the Council on
August 6, 1973, declared a moratorium on future development in this area until
such time as an access road is provided to the County Road 18 and Maloney
interchange. Without this road all additional traffic created by any new
development will have a tendency to egress from the neighborhood out View Lane
and Schaefer.
The staff would thus recommend that the Planning Commission approve this plat
contingent on the Council's granting relief of this August 6th, 1973., moratorium„
GLsln
8/30/74
SCALE: I ViCH--`L'�-'�-9.zZT WSSMGY AVENUE,Sk PAULS904
OF PROPE! T'rf OF
WCAMC%
DESCRIMED AN
L
if
"Toot '01kv'
'A
CERTHICATA OF LOCAMON 01P BTAU)!�SG
o3,- Su� ',7,V,.`Y
curtify th"t it Iq lh,,�rthy
ck,-,t5 t !-�at on — ------ 19
plan, or rupLat wiN pr&arlf KY W 19 "Wr IN
100'ey. PPM, W -PIA WIS PYQavA in; K! to und-r
Mun "y"qwWa MA Ant I am a dws VoqMvd Laid rnv
dYwcs3at-rdsbn
S!at" tyE Mla0t,, ',I. S"Hya,vr
it
und. the laws of ap 9140 of A
"AM t e-A&My
Wn ."My
I
The developer of this subdivision has b( -en required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
El R, dedicate o of the bind
.C. clonatE> `.a^ Mr"t '�__.._ `} '; 'as Y fee in 11 e o_a=c
as a r(,sul_ t of zi}_)pLvin ; the fo.}lo., i n�, policy
A. hand l?e(.1Lllrc,d (no d it 1.'tV or l nt(JnE>1_ty may . `F` us-,. '.^-ot}'.Ci f11`'St �
O._
land dedicated)
.}f" pr'uperty is adjacent V) an cxistin'(:; t '.-
bCnE: .Cially E-Xj)al-1dr, the par
El2. If 1'iroperty is fi rrC:r"> or
:i0 t}lc3t the End result W].il. 1)c; c. Pii.II?.Tll:7 c- 3 n acre n is^1;.
L.J 3. If property al5uts a natural .1al e, pont',
LJ4 . -I F pr:)Perty 1.1 necc sf:ary for,.> tO,: iii -,,alk-ci 0a1-1--, ar-ol .. 1 1 be.
dredu,cd or O`_11r,1idl5E, liilDrov"71d ane will
5 If the prop—rty is a place C)'1 S1F-flifY.cm-lt ._-_.. -a`, sce-1C: C -)-
hl: toric value, .
El 6
I -[n
1 ._
2-
.. 71't
SUhGi.visicn,
ST,",I)T`,';STO1 1)i:1)IC..`i'iO'1
1C: Pla-iini.n- Commission
Par", 1)o rd
Environ: ,ental
Cuali-tty Comm .s:>lon
1'1:0�t: P1�lnnin�, De})-lY.'t:il�lllt
--� /1
-B
j/ 11
rA
, II
.t r_,. tr
SU )IVISI.O:"i
11!11x},,: k, !, <
(• Ete A.�
A' r .r..1
LAND VALUE).
"J 7
The developer of this subdivision has b( -en required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
El R, dedicate o of the bind
.C. clonatE> `.a^ Mr"t '�__.._ `} '; 'as Y fee in 11 e o_a=c
as a r(,sul_ t of zi}_)pLvin ; the fo.}lo., i n�, policy
A. hand l?e(.1Lllrc,d (no d it 1.'tV or l nt(JnE>1_ty may . `F` us-,. '.^-ot}'.Ci f11`'St �
O._
land dedicated)
.}f" pr'uperty is adjacent V) an cxistin'(:; t '.-
bCnE: .Cially E-Xj)al-1dr, the par
El2. If 1'iroperty is fi rrC:r"> or
:i0 t}lc3t the End result W].il. 1)c; c. Pii.II?.Tll:7 c- 3 n acre n is^1;.
L.J 3. If property al5uts a natural .1al e, pont',
LJ4 . -I F pr:)Perty 1.1 necc sf:ary for,.> tO,: iii -,,alk-ci 0a1-1--, ar-ol .. 1 1 be.
dredu,cd or O`_11r,1idl5E, liilDrov"71d ane will
5 If the prop—rty is a place C)'1 S1F-flifY.cm-lt ._-_.. -a`, sce-1C: C -)-
hl: toric value, .
El 6
I -[n
1 ._
2-