Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1974-11-12 Park Board PacketQTY OF EDINA PARK BOARD HEETiNG November 12, 1974 AGENDA 1. Approval of NinuTes - Park Sow:j Meeting Oclobor G. 192} H. Arena Report WI. Golf Course Report IV. Recreation ReporT V. Planning Request S-744; Vt. Planning Request Z-74-1! I • I.00FsTION MAP O \ � o �,�` ✓U�✓�/���%�/� o moo_ (� Z I 3 W o a OR a , o FJELD AYEN DOVRE DRIVEo ~ 2 4 ¢ \ a .0 o z z BISGAYNE BLVD.p BISC4YNE BLVD Z C� r o oAL`NU:T OPS LONDONDERRY ONO NOERRY ® DRIVE H ; Z f zoning ' subdivision REQUEST NUMBER: Z-74-11 East of County Road 18, South LOCATION: of Malib-ul Drive REQUEST: Rezoning 4 ---mm R-1 to R-2 and PID village ugannins den rimenf village of edin€� EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 16, 1974 5-74-13 Edina Green (Village Development Company). Generally located north of'the J.C. Penney Warehouse, east of County Road 18 and south of. Malibu Drive. AND Z-74-11 Village Development Company. Generally located north of the J.C. Warehouse, east of County Road 18 and south of Malibu Drive. R-1 to R-2 Multiple Residence District and PID Planned Industrial District. Refer to: Attached survey and other site data. The proponent's property is located adjacent to County Road 18 (now undergoing. freeway upgrading) and is north of the existing industrial area, south of Wallace Kenneth's vacant but zoned multiple area, and is immediately west of Parkwood Knolls 4th Addition. The proponents are requesting to have the property subdivided and zoned to create a single family, duplex (R-2), and industrial (PID) area. The resulting division *mould create a four acre PID site, a 6.2 acre park (of 8.1 acres which are in the flood plain), 15 single family lots on a net 3.7 acres, and 5 duplex lots on a net 2.0 acres; the remainder of the property would be right of way, which is 3.0 acres. The plan generally conforms to the Western Edina comprehensive plan. That plan indicated that industrial use would be the highest and best use south of Nine Mile Creek (which divides the property diagonally). To the north and east of Nine Mile Creek the plan calls for a low density multiple buffer (townhouse or duplex) and indicates the remainder of the site should be used for single family homes. The setback from Nine Mile Creek on the south side is shown to be 50 feet, and on the north side it is shown to be from 250-350 feet. The encroachment into the flood plain is shown to be the maximum allowed of 20%, or approximately 1.6 acres. The majority of the encroachment is proposed to be accomplished on the industrial side of the creek, and it should be noted that no specific plans have been received from the developer for the exact layout of that indus- trial building. Therefore, it may be assumed that a lesser encorachment would happen at that time. This proposed plan compliments and accomplishes many of the goals established in the Western Edina traffic study approved in February by the City Council. The plan shows a connection to ?western Parkwood Knolls, and Malibu Drive and Lincoln Drive both on the north side and south side of the -creek. The single family and duplex areas are separated from the Parkwood Knolls area by a line of trees and by a steep grade. The lot sizes proposed in the single family area vary from 9,750 square feet to 14,000 square feet, with an average of about 10,500 square feet. The duplex lots vary from 15,000 square feet to a very narrow but deep lot which is 21,300 square feet. The lot sizes of the surrounding property vary from approximately 20,000 square foot lots in S-74-13 & Z-74-11 Staff Report Page 2 Malibu Heights to an average of 35,000 square foot lots in Parkwood Knolls (these lots vary from 30,000-50,000 square feet). Recommendation: It would be the staff's recommendation that the subdividing for both the industrial and the park area is adequate and conforms well with the goals of the Western Edina Plan and other stated goals. It is further our recommendation and opinion that the transportation system both conforms to the stated goals and aids significantly in accomplishing them. The recommendation in regard to the duplex lots is that the western most 15,000 square foot duplex lot should be eliminated and a portion of that be included in the park area, as this property is now flood plain and has poor soils. If that recommendation is adopted, it would allow the adjoining 15,000 square foot duplex lot to be expanded to 18,000 square feet, which would create a much more buildable lot. In regard to the single family lots, it is felt that there is an adequate transition made from Malibu Heights on the north to the smaller lots in this proposed subdivision. That transition is not, however, enjoyed between the Parkwood Knolls 4th Addition and this subdigision. The proponents have pointed out that these smaller lots are essentially a buffer between the industrial area and the single family area and therefore should be allowed to remain small. In regard to the lots on the east side of Malibu Drive, it would be the staff's opinion, however, that because of the steep slopes at the north end and the poor soils at the south end and the fact that this area is heavily wooded, a reduction of the number of lots would be appropriate so that more vegetation can be retained, allowing an even greater transition. Because of the rearranged timing of this Planning Commission. meeting, it should be noted that neither the Environmental Quality Commission nor the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District have had a chance to review this project. G:ln 10/11/74 s ��ivision :;o. S _ 74 " 13 SUBDIVISION DEDICATIO14 -:=,XBT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: ��''�L "� �N LAND VALUE: $ by: date: 5%=$ The developer of this subdivision has been reqji-red to A. grant an easement over part of the� 7-d B. dedicate�`gtj % of the land( C. donate $ as a\fee ms lieu of land as a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intens. -it— may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) l 1. If property is adjacent to an exiz�>-ing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a of a 6 acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. ❑ 4. If property is necessary for sto_^ water holding and will be dredged or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place. 5. If the property is a place ofsib ==icant natural, scenic or historic value. M B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than abova. ❑ 2. 00 subdivision REQUEST NUMBER: S-74-9 Between McCauley Trail & Arrowhei LOCATION:Lake, N of Margaret's Lane & S 01 McCauley C.'rcle. REQUEST: Three lot single fa^ily subdivision a llaae nl8nrcing clenr I village of eden� EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 161 1974 S-74-9 McCauley Heights 5th Addition. Generally located between McCauley Trail and Arrowhead Lake, north of Margaret's Lane and south of McCauley Circle. (Continued from 9-4-74) Refer to: Attached graphic. The Planning Commission may recall that the McCauleys had earlier requested further subdivision of their property, with the traffic generated from those new lots dependent on existing private easements. The staff submitted alternatives to the McCauley's proposal showing public access, and the Planning Commission tabled the request for further study. The McCaulevs have now studied the staff solution as well as other solutions and have prepared a revised subdivision including an alternate road location. Their proposed road, as shown on the attached graphic, follows the extreme northern line of their property and serves the property from the north rather than from the south as the staff had suggested. In reviewing their request, we noted less than adequate right of way and proposed surfacing. Given the grades, it is necessary that the cul-de-sac be a 45 foot radius ROW with 35 feet paved and that the road be a 50 foot ROW with 30 feet paved. Recommendation: In reviewing this subdivision, the staff concluded that this subdivision meets the minimum requirements for subdividing. It does not, however, surpass those minimum requirements by a significant amount. In recommending approval the staff would suggest a widening of the proposed new road as detailed above, a requirement that the intersection with McCauley Trail be clear -viewed as this road meets McCauley on a bend, and, finally, that the Planning Commission and developer should be aware that the combination of choosing this location for the road, the required cuts necessary to achieve a reasonable grade for this road, and the relocation of the existing facilities and consturction of new facilities will considerably denude the north end of the site. Further, this solution does not correct any of the problems which were created by the last subdivision in this area. GL:ln 10/10/74 P0►f 0f part 0 Lot 5 JN � � � ► ) � } ! y R' ,' ♦ �� tie,0 � ^ � 4 IK t >� . / ►�'}' ' F� 3t LANE rt,.44 .. op • LA IIf's _3 T O 41 ti •� / �ti. J.�,. O y !e+ V— .� . it `\F ` ✓� iso i k p, ,3 !i D 1 tiM "• t + ? 1 2 10107. "` ' 1 ^ V`� �• il �- 101 �: � / f;'�:.. r •tit !l `lTl t •'• 1/ •0 v y+t !. OUTLOT4+3 •� J .rj + V iI 3 J 147 .,19 f ` ' /• ac Ste, L CK..\F\ t ps / .. l,i. •:c '.: �� tib. f� J -r1-4 �.:� f • i J �' V Cw 4- "�✓ �;. N � t„ tom\ - � '.•, , -1416 McCAULW NEIOHY�S R0141 a Y: ' V`1` I.. ► i Q vii 1-�tt•,t ,� O� /' 1 •'3� 1b q �,�• 7' z Z - j js l!Y�"li �E'V, ^ ��r, t"��• i� TWO a M, MGCAULE Y r� !rl, LOT i X NE1(3r4TS n '•. �[��+, cMF ` �' '"';.••" .�DS'II'oj„ ^�' a. i SSCsf� "�5 ~40� o Z G �v S ' `_ri. '�• Q ADD. v \h. e � ,�y a y \ O• `� y \ ss i , tl` r Q y• ��O * p t f t S .. 4t ,ny�1 J 41, `,. 7 fir. — �(,,,.� _'tI� p►(I•H 11 r \�J I� C�' r. '' : .i `'ik1.O�1%�a.rs�.,. '�'. c.B�eK'.�l �. l S•:'y to .:i.'�✓.-.s. rH'�2. .0 i� ter: •. if'_� /A�14/i/ -4 1 t . Lot areas' i s' pr'o'posed Pi CAULLY HEIGHTS 5TO , ADDI Ti ON - Area pf port ion of,,l,ot ' I •above I ake•:leve! < !.0 •acres tI Area - L.o.t 0.5 acres Area 1 00f1'o•t A t x'3.25 .acres r Area Mc-`Cau I ey L'ana, acres flroared by e To acres Subdivlslon No. c tet_ SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: A C' C LAPID VALUE: $ � � � � � t7 5% = $ %qO (o. by: date: Ze /O- The developer of this subdivision has been required to QA. grant an easement over part of the\ land EIB. dedicate o of the land C. donate $ l as a fee in lieu of land as a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) F1 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. F1 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. Q4. If property is necessary for storr.water. holding and will be dredged or otherwise improved and will be a sonic place. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. 2. A GOLF COURSE FWD STATEMENT OF ai>>GOME AND E °A SE CITY OF EDINA For Wnw !Lnthn Ending Saptz-�or 30, 197 REVENUE Membership fen--, Green feta:, hKe Par 3 Golf car are cart reatal Locker re:d. Other OPERATING E>EWQ,, Administration: iti�TT,v•����ion: Manager Pro Printing Supp 155 insurance apd C 4:4m Sy'- +m Retirement, insurance, er?i ic e supplies, etc. Mileage, school, handicap vervEco Othar Audit 80 1 d I ng -- clubhouse and pro ,hop Salaries and wages Telephone Water Fuel Light and power Laundry Less amount charged to grill Repair A building Insurance Supplies Other TOTAL BUILDING - CLUBHOUSE AMD PRO SHOP y' 9,472 11,610 $ 61738 Y A; `3e'af f 3 Dec; c:. . x._23,530.__ ... _ 2,c� 2O1 - - f -...z 3 35,370 87,525 2,40': 52,034 47,232 38 30,261 29,75= r.. .2,450 21,172 1, 2Y 998 983 1,, 2,666 570 1 ,r , 1,591 2,400 y' 9,472 11,610 $ 61738 Y A; 3,000 2,000 1,00i'' 5,823 5081 -- '2131 814 2 1 A t 6,121 2,611 38 e21,) 1,319 .2'i 1,007 139 RK, 442 730 28011- '.80' 11,610 10,530 I'm 551 50 3 220 1,456 1,23Q-;: 950 $ 11,231 $ 6,568 $4 , G6; 1 '09 837 2 103 103 -- 600 814 2 1 A t 6,121 2,611 e 3,51 237 266 .2'i 2,460 10404 aN; 2,480 5,064 2,580-* 378 378 1,591 2,400 91 421 S OPERATING EXPENSES (Cont'd.) Maintenance of course and ground5: Salaries and wages: Superintendent Maintenance Telephone Light W power Fuel Fertilizer and chemical Sand, gravel , and rock Blacktop and asphalt Svd, tree replacement, etc. Lumber Repairs Supplies Equipment operatica Other CT -1. a -1. [1iAfl'C*CEf0CE - COURSE • 70TAALNQDPGERROAUTNINDSG EXPENSES iccome on investments Net Income - #,,perating depanments WCOME BEFORE IHTEREST AND DEPRECEATION Merest on bonds interest on loan - Liquor Fund TOTAL INTEREST At' COME BEFORE DEPRECIATION Provision for depreciation NET WOME RUSS) 1974 --0973 $ 9,934 $ 8,579 41,420 42,036 610 74 1 SIX - 217 353 W. 40? 3,604 VA, 2'04 ,, 259 1 , 790 5,528 1 4yis 251 !,225 92Z 40, 473 1,697 2,512 810 1,208 727 50 3,153 3,853 700* 3,6v 3,767 15y'. ?1,655 TWO 540 573 430 $ 82,119 140,137' 137,105 j'oy'- 71 TIF —73 $ — $ 3,665 $ L659 $1,0v 13,00 17,5311 5 4 (81 $ 98,920 $ 93,335 $5,585 14,922 15,741 319* 6,Q'; 6,435 — 77.563 $ 71,159 PAC!! 7,452 7,839 330 $ 70,111 $ 63,320 $0,75'' A GOLF COURSE FUND 10PERATIN? DEPARTMENTS) STATEVENT OF INCOME AND &PENSE CITY OF EDINA For Nino Months Ending SepwWr 10, 19A RANGE: Income Less oparating expwsas GRI LL: I ncome Food Beveragc Other Less operating expenses: Personal services Contractual services Commodities MET WONE - GRILL NET INCOME - WERATiNG DEPARTMENTS Inc - 11se $0,443 qqw TV, $33,809 $32,436 WIT'', A,Q6 14,05 An'' >0 TAT 42-- 24,020 503 '17,015 $0,470 $ 4,432 3,413 24,020 24,803 3,178 2,217 56, $10,002 $17,534 $ QW,31 Novczi,,,�cr 12, 1 MErJ10 TO: Park Do, -,rd Meimbers FROr.;: G'c f f ("ou rse Subcorni-il i t`fc,�, SUBJECT: Go if Course Rccomimendatiort s The course subc�x'lilt-pec) met sevorat -Mmcs durimi +Bio su-rdncr and ''rhe fas:- Tho i'orthcoming i'rom m,ac­ i ng I)c, J ng, Hovcmbor I i , 1974. cor'llm i T`,-c3i -0 ;7S 110 " to" ­5: GOLF COURSE COIN'STIRUCTION PRCi? ITwES i. trm,.odiarl�()iy start urork on ccns,i*ruc-;-inj ''G car ccn 17 grocn. llolc 1;6 violuld a par 4 and hole `7 a par 3. Z. Rebuild ;,,.12 Tee, for women ca.nd 112 t:"o f -or 130 12 m<. i' teo wria I i (:-,, r. 3. IR'obuild ,72 C-,,raen. V'r is, hoped that -i-ho abo""or: 01 i couid, N� P,, 75 antl -'Nhat Th,) i. I - priorl,, could be mmple,�c-1 snJ i:­dv or 4. Rebui id -rho, fof lowing girr,,ens, in This "13 5. Id �mrL­ns -1*o� -.s -i or :hol as and i'l I One m-r-iber c� the coil -!M' i tl-ec stum, the cras-,� -:iIc richt of F n -)C ovn- cria So 1(:scu:1 Eli -id i-iio 12-ili Eo L - V +h(-q'ira.'ss. Y V 3 0*1%,_,�! 3 fc�" � CY11C.'s-11. Y :)Ij J, *. :-1c: d to a _-Troing 1 liipi ci- co1ro e Y bn (" Tac 5 r I nr 0'_it?'?; a til -2 r I roo cou rse. YCOS C, CKa§'!1 an" ;1. Z ;,Q;w.c Ln 1. 1 S (4,ou 1 C'. a i.%o hanii 1 cc, rom --)'s onc, iu;, i 1irg Atz..:? ':'ho pla­e��'; M-� COLHI,'31 L C -1cc F n A ISO rcccc,-,mr2r nh Eli -id i-iio 12-ili Eo L - V 00 Pago Odiscussod 14hepresonif reserval ion Po l; o,,�g i y -'hcq-! -11he reservation 3o i a cy s'-ir u i d r or--ia n c"ge On -Sunday ii -:o- n 0113 excepi-iom (ho�� H)c 5^!u-,lon be afio-.--Od 1 -he samma star,-',-ing as i -,h,:-,, riiert The comm �"i�ce thanks the Park Board tor --i,he opportunity -,'-o serve and also hoper, 1 -hat The repor-r wili be of value, and that they will be wit ing to servo again in � 975.