The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1974-12-10 Park Board PacketAGEf,.'C,A a. Approval o4l MinuteS -- Pat* Board Meet ng November Q, 6974 I I . Or --i I nances - Dog Wa 11: k i ng and Motor i zed Veh I c i es Planning Reques-t- - S-74-15 IV. Plannilng Request - Z--74- 7 V. Capital improve monlis Program -- Bond ksur,: i Mill - 320,000 i/2 Mill - 160,000 550,000 - Pool 1,450,000 - Parks 750,000 - Open Space 2,750,000 ED t NA PARK BOARD COND � SSUE - Bonds nds - Operations House i Hi I l 1 l/2 Mi I [s 40,000 04.20 21.30 50,000 18.20 27.30 60,000 22.20 33.30 0 .-A LJOCATION subdivision REQUEST NUMBER: S-74-15 North of Pine Grove Road and LOCATION: South of Mirror Dake. REQUEST: 6 lot single family subdivision village planning d=artment viUage of edina EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT November 26, 1974 S-74-15 Gravtower Estates. Generally located north of Pine Grove Road and south of Mirror Lake. Refer to: Subdivision Graphic. Request: Six lot single family subdivision. The proponents are requesting to combine two existing pieces of property at the end of Pine Grove Road, east of Blake Road, to then redivide those properties into six single family lots. The property has frontage on Mirror Lake. As can be seen on the attached graphic, the lots are generally of a median size between the Idvlwood Addition, with 141000-275000 square foot lots, and the Mirror Lakes Addition, with 30,000-55,000 square foot lots. The staff :could recommend approval of the proposed subdivision, noting, however, that the house to be built on Lot 1, Block 1 will have to be built high on the hill so that sewer services can be properly extended. This approval is recommended with the following modifications: 1. That a storm sewer easement is shown. 2. That the proposed 100 foot park easement shown on the plat is shown as a full dedication for park purposes. GL:ln 11/21/74 7T, ro 11 141 fol A - 11 ft -4 A C4 ;04 C4% i',? ( 7, .j VV INI jj 1A. Lfir, '-t LZ E-4 ....... 4T E-4 to "jj cdo e5 it i6 pit cu ON 00 kn in !\x 0 It (7% r4 00 %0 . .. ..La.f. CO 0. C N xr1N .TM w + �, "C� r�r .;4�: r ;:. �, '` CL 00 r,, c') M CI) M C\ cla 44 0) $4 co V-4 N en Ln %0 E-4 41 4J 4J 4J 4J " 4J E-4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subdivision No. 74 — SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: GLA) 5i� LAND VALUE: $ 50 = $ The developer of this subdivision has been required to 01A. grant an easement over part of the land �B. dedicate r ° of th> 1.�.-::A ED C. ' donate $ �:s a fee in lieu cf land ,�s a result of applying the following A. Land Required (no density or inten.L;ity may he used for the f;rst 51-0 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the add_y_en beneficially expands the pari.. Fj 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined wit- .future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. El 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place. ❑ 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. on MC CAUIEY TRAI_'_ CROSSVIEW UTHERAN CHURCH I / . MAP :... .CREEK VAIIE;Y:.'_ PARK' CREEK VALL �Pa3 ELEM. SCH �v a i D,�—�� Q WIV r r a ` O LA"O A ACH£ D. !h'I Air REQUEST NUMBER: Z-74-7 South of Cressto:rr. LOCATION: & I•lest of rleason ?oad REQUEST: R-1 Single Family nistrict to PRD -5 Planned Res?, en-=__ District for anartnents on tJictor� -'Jilage village of edina GL:ln 11/21/74 EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION • STAFF REPORT November 26, 1974 Z-74-4 Folke Victorsen. (The Timbers) Generally located at the southwest corner of Gleason Road and the Crosstown Highway. Refer to: Final Development Plan Booklet Request: R-1 Single Family Residence District to PRD -3 Planned Residential District. The concept approval for the Victorsen's 74 unit apartment building and 21 single family homes has been granted by the City Council. The developer then submitted the final development plans, from which the staff was better able to determine the necessary grading and utility needs for the site. It was found during the review session of those final development plans that a substantial loss of vegetation would be incurred by either grading, utilities, the retaining wall, or by the necessary utility provision. At that meeting there was a concensus of opinion from the Fire Department, who for fire access and the desire to have a concrete building, felt a five story building on the north side would be more desirable. The staff environmentalist is extremely concerned about the grading and loss of vegetation, and he, too, wholeheartedly encouraged this staff member to rethink his earlier negative recommendation regarding that five story building. The Engineering Department, in their comments, detailed the amount of grading and vegetation loss that would be incurred should the single family homes be allowed to develop. Further, it was the Engineering Department's opinion that the grade on Timberview Road was entirely too steep. ?.e commendation: I still retain my earlier opinion that this proposal is a compromise of the environment and development aspects. Thev are, however, both compromised to too great of a degree. The staff therefore recommends that the earlier submitted request for five story apartment buildings be approved, however., at a lower density than the 12 units Der acre reouested. It would be the staff's suggestion that we allow eight units per acre and that the building mass he almost immediately on the north lot line of the property, thus minimizing the cutting into the hill. If variances are needed for that location, it would further be our recommendation that they be granted as part of the PRD request. It would he understood that this development would he the final development for the entire site and that the rest of the land remain open. The best possible solution to ensuring its preservation Mould he that this total site, exclusive of the minimum needed for the building and construction, he dedicated to Edina as parkland, and that a life estate or some other instru- ment he negotiated for the one acre property at the top of the hill. s Z_ —144—:g Sub('� vision No. SU3DIVISION DEDICATION ?._-='ORT TO: Planning Ccm:nission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: V-Cfe LA:JD VALUE: $ 5% = $ The developer of this subdivision has been required to F_JA. grant an easement over part of the lard dedicate D t o of the land 011) C. donate S S /o P Arl L) C as a fee In lieu of land v as a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensi , may be used for the first 50 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an exising park and the addition beneficial -11V expands the park. 2. If property is 6 acres or will be ccmbired with future dedications so that the end result will be a m=nimum of a 6 acre park. Q3. If property abuts a natural lake, Dond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for stor-- water holding and will be dredged or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. • B. Cash Required F] 1. In all other instances than above. Q 2. . 0 ALVENUE Season tickets Retail sales Concussions Jail y skating fee: Spectator dees Ice rental Services Vending machine commission Income fir, investments UPE.RATIc2G EXPEdSES Salaries andswages Manager City clerical 1101 ire Ice guards Cashiers and ticket takers .Maintenance Organist Concession labor Total Salaries and !.rages Mileage and conferences Printing - tickets, notices Laundry Telephone Light and power Fuel and heat Paint Cleaning supplies Lumber General supplies Equipment maintcriance Central services Food purchased Insurance Other Audit Total Contractual Services and Commodities Total Operating E:,p`>nses INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND DEPRECIATIOR Interest or Doncis lntere t on Loan - Liquor §--.end TOTAL i NTEREST INCOi•1E (LOSS) CEFORII: ia�1`..RiF,CTAT I0'! Provision for De racir3tinn NET INCOME (LOS -SI 1n;;rease 'i 197; Decrease* $ 62,76' 31,216 $ 809* 1 t, 173 12* .;,64o 12,767 7,113* 5,163 5,475 312* a ., �.` 11,976 2,024"* 87,111 84,286 2,325 5,564 5,443 121 4,505 -- 11,505 --� 68 68* _ _ e:e 7 , 2 ._......s,... -,.. $151,4014 $ 2,1)92* $ 62,76' s 12,416 $ 547 1 • 717 i "A 1 324* 1,307 1 , 52.9 222* -1,063 9,669 1,354 44,414 37,603 6,731 720 310 90* 2+U09 7�}, ;✓� - 1,456 63:3 ;x; 3: $ e,391 702 1,204 502* 927 1,447 520* 4.'n, 290 1313 '1,149 1,106 43 17,"A7 21,435 3,588* 16,094 12,357 3,737 433 1 ,217 814* 1,970 870 1,109 962 182 730 7,931.1 6i594 1,344 7,223 23,339 16,116* 12;.320 10,670 1,650 2,452 5,477 3,025* 1,465 1'518 33* 795 1,351 552* 900 800 100 73,63U $ 39,337 $16,249: c1.1.v,412 _� 515 ,270 $ 7,358* ]OU. (4,866) 4,966* 12,749 14,053 1,309* 9, 350 9 , 350 -- N 22,U99 {> 23,40U $ 11309* (28,274) 6,2-75* 3 9 9_!3 22 S F6-, _.._� $0z, 67 ,253*