The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-06-13 Parks & Rec Comm PacketDraft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Edina Parks & Recreation Commission Edina City Hall, Council Chambers Tuesday, May 9, 2017 7 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair McCormick called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Miller, Nelson, Gieseke, Burke, McCormick, Dahlien, McAwley and Student Commissioner Hulbert. Commissioner Willett arrived at 7:25 p.m. Absent were: Commissioners Good, Strother and Student Commissioner Gustafson. Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton, Water Resources Coordinator Jessica Wilson and Engineering Services Manager Ross Binter III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Dahlien to change the order of the agenda and have the Arden Park Natural Resource Draft Concept Plan the first item under Reports and Recommendations. Motion seconded by McAwley. Motion carried. Motion made by Dahlien to approve the amended agenda. Motion seconded by Gieseke. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Nelson to approve the April 4, 2017 minutes. Motion seconded by Burke. Motion carried. V. Community Comment Art Lowell, 7505 Kellogg, is concerned about the possibility of having soccer fields at Fred Richards Park. Dennis Wither, 4504 Sedum Lane, is concerned about the possibility of having two soccer fields and traffic. He also wanted to challenge the need for two soccer fields. Stan Davis, 5509 Woodcrest Drive, wanted to discuss the lack of communication from the Parks & Recreation Department to the city in general with regards to the Arden Park restoration project. VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Arden Park Natural Resource Draft Concept Plan Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator and Renae Clark, Planner and Project Manager from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District presented the history of the Arden Park Natural Resource Concept Plan. They informed the commission they are asking for their feedback and for a recommendation to the City Council. Also discussed were the community engagement process and the timeline for the project. Commissioners asked questions, expressed concerns and gave their feedback. Motion made by Nelson to recommend the Arden Park Natural Resources Plan to the City Council. Motion seconded by McAwley. Motion carried. B. Park Signage Replacement Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus gave an update on the signage project. She presented the proposed final design for the park entrance signs and gave details of the signage. Commissioners asked questions, had discussions and expressed their views. C. Park Visits Commissioner McAwley • Indicated there is a huge dandelion problem in the parks. Staff Liaison Kattreh replied the city has a Turf Management Plan that they follow that the City Council has approved. Commissioner Nelson • Asked if any spraying has been done for the mosquitos and gnats in the parks. Staff Liaison Kattreh replied that is something that is done by the state. • Indicated she used the App to let Park Maintenance know there was a problem with a bench at Todd Park and asked what the expected turnaround time is. Staff Liaison Kattreh replied the goal would be a day or two. Commissioner Dahlien • Asked how the removal of the Braemar Dome went. Staff Liaison Kattreh replied with their dedicated team this was the smoothest it has ever gone. VII. City Council Updates, Correspondence and Petitions A. City Council Updates April 4, April 18 and May 2, 2017 Chair McCormick acknowledged the commission’s receipt of the City Council updates. B. Correspondence Chair McCormick acknowledged the commission’s receipt of various correspondences. C. Petition – Playground at Van Valkenburg Park Chair McCormick acknowledged the commission’s receipt of the petition with regards to a playground at Van Valkenburg Park. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. VIII. Chair and Member Comments Chair McCormick: • Due to schedule conflicts the retreat will be held during the June meeting • Location: Pamela Park • Start time: 5:30pm • Activities for the meeting will include park tour, dinner, team building activities and potentially a speaker in addition to discussing ideas for their 2018 work plan • In preparation for work plan development, commissioners should review the Parks Strategic Plan Commissioner Nelson: • Requested more information on long term funding of projects and playground upgrades • Liaison Kattreh informed the group that she will be discussing funding issues with Council Commissioner Dahlien: • Welcomed the two new commissioners and wished Commissioner Miller a Happy belated Birthday. Commissioner Burke, Edina Public Schools Member • Introduced herself to the commission as Director for Community Education Services Commissioner Willett • Introduced himself to the commission. IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh and Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus gave the following updates: • On Thursday, May 11 starting at 5:30 a.m. the MN Department of Agriculture will be treating a portion of Richfield and Minneapolis for the gypsy moth infestation. They are using the Edina Aquatic Center parking lot as a staging and take-off and landing area for their helicopters. • On May 18 staff and the Parks & Recreation Commission members who are participating in the Fred Richards master planning process are going to be reviewing the next version of the Fred Richards concept plan; the next open house is scheduled for Monday, May 22. They received favorable feedback from the technical evaluation team regarding a potential wetland bank for the west side of Fred Richards Park. This will give them the ability to move forward with the next phase in the wetland banking projects. • Four consultants have been selected to interview for the Braemar Master Plan; HGA, SEH, SRF and Damon Farber. The interviews will be held on Tuesday, May 23 and the final selection will go to City Council on June 6. • There was vandalism at Pamela Park. There is a lighting cabinet that is adjacent to the artificial turf field that is used to control the lights; however, it no longer controls the lights Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. but it has still been a real problem because people are literally breaking into the cabinet to try to control the lights. They are in the process of replacing a cabinet again and have purchased a remote lighting control system so that all of the lights are being controlled over a network so nothing is being controlled at the field. • The Aquatic Center has had the filters installed and the zero depth play structure is currently being installed so it is ready when the pool opens. • Construction at Braemar Golf Course is well underway on the regulation course. Richard Mandell will be hosting a kick-off construction meeting on May 16. • Last Saturday they had a very successful Vehicle Day. Edina partnered with Richfield and Bloomington and the event was held at Southdale; they had a great turnout. • This weekend is Race for the Cure that is hosted at Southdale and the race goes around Rosland Park. • The hockey boards at Todd Park were taken down this past week. • The parking lot renovations at Creek Valley are being completed; they are currently adding the second lift of asphalt so that the parking lot is in great shape. • The fishing pier and lake fountain are in at Rosland Park. • This Friday and Saturday is the Annual Plant Sale for the Edina Garden Council at Arneson Acres. It’s on Friday, May 12 from 10 a.m. – 8 p.m. and Saturday, May 13 from 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. The Garden Council is a non-profit organization that funnels a lot of resources back into Edina parks. • The Community Garden opened this past Saturday; all 55 plots are full and there are 12 people on the waiting list. • There is a softball tournament this weekend at Pamela Park and a baseball tournament at Courtney Fields. • May 20 is National Kids to Parks Day; this is a national event put on by the National Park Trust and this year will be their 7th annual. Overall the purpose is to try to get kids out and be active. Their motto is active kids are healthy kids. In Edina they are hosting a photo contest by challenging neighborhoods to take photos and submit them. The neighborhood that sends in the most photos is going to win and will have their best photo published in the June edition of Edition Edina as well as the neighborhood will be recognized. X. Adjournment Motion made by Gieseke to adjourn the May 9, 2017 meeting at 9:19 p.m. Motion seconded by Dahlien. Motion carried. 71 '1-1— -- - —'17.1. ''-: 1, .-ffr i,. , . • . -i ,,,, n 'ii 1 ii.-—r ' — • '- ' - ...,. .,_14' A will . if," 'or ',Hi 1' '..- 1: .., Pamela Park Construction Completed in 2015 A master plan of Pamela Park was completed in 2009. This information was updated by a working group of the Park Board in 2013. Due to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District trail modifications were needed and are reflected in finished project. The site plan includes: • Renovation of the north field to a sand peat field (180' x 360') including drain tile and irrigation • Re-grading grass field (300' x 160') to provide practice field • Renovating senior lighted field to an artificial turf field (100,560 SF) • Adding hard path trails around park — I mile loop • Expanding parking lots on north, west and south sides of the park • Top dress the existing environmental trail on the east side of the park The shelter building includes: • Storage area for athletic associations and parks and recreation use • Restroom facilities • Kitchenette and work space (no office) • Great room for the community to utilize for neighborhood gatherings, special occasion rentals, and for ice skaters. • Accommodation for the city well in the existing shelter building • A city well is located on the north side of the Pamela shelter building. State code requires that no drain be located within 50' of the well head. The building design reflects these code requirements. • Asphalt paths were extended north to 58th Street and south to 62nd Street • The shelter is 1880 SF, plus 380 SF in the well room and 460 SF of storage space. The storage space is needed for athletic associations and the Parks and Recreation Department and is also helping to provide the needed 50' buffer for the well. For comparison, the new shelter building at Countryside is 1740 SF. • Original project budget was approximately $3.4 million. Cost closer to $3.6 due to soil corrections due to contaminated soils. • Project alternates considered were a canopy for the shelter building ($40,904), fireplace for the shelter building ($ 19,977) equipment storage building ($76,972) near the artificial turf field, complete new entry drive and parking lot on north side ($77,088) and shed roof ($75,739) were considered. Parking lot and shed roof alternates were selected by the City Council. • Braemar Field, Backyard, locker rooms & refrigeration change cost approximately $ 12.25 million EY'n PARK, RECREATION & TRAILS STRATEGIC MASTER PLAN I 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROJECT PROCESS The foundation of the Strategic Plan was the compilation of a number of different public input sessions, stakeholder input, staff and city official insight, and consultant experience and expertise. It was important to engage community members who enjoy participating in the planning process and encourage participation among those members that typically do not contribute. The consultant team conducted a series of 14 focus groups with key stakeholders of the Department. Focus groups took place in December of 2014, and solicited valuable input from more than one hundred individuals. Participants included residents, community leaders, business owners, recreation providers, athletic associations, civic groups, neighborhood associations, environmental organizations, departmental staff, maintenance staff, City Council, the Executive Leadership Team, and the Park Board. The information received from these community input processes was applied to the overall planning process and was combined with the expertise of the consultant team, bench►narking data, standards from the National Recreation and Parks Association and best practices from other communities. This is critical when accurately articulating the true unmet needs, addressing key issues, providing recommendations for change, and strategizing to move the Department forward for optimum results. The Community Values Model TM was modified to provide the foundations of the Edina Parks Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan. The Community Values Model TM is an innovative process to utilize comprehensive public input and insight in a meaningful way. Input, guidance, and values from key community leaders, stakeholders, and the general public were used to create overall guiding principles and values of the community related to the delive►y of parks, recreation facilities, and program services. The model is then used as the basis for developing or reaffirming the vision, mission, and goals for the strategic plan. The strategic objectives address unique areas of parks and recreation planning that guide the plan. 8 I CITY OF EDINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDINA TODAY COMMUNITY PROFILE Community profile looked at demographics and similar providers in order to help understand what Edina is today and how they could potentially be tomorrow. This is an important step to evaluate how the Edina Parks and Recreation Department (EPRD) is meeting the needs of current residents and what gaps or opportunities are present now, and compared to projected demographics in the future. Overall, findings from this analysis inform the plan's strategic recommendations to keep the EPRD relevant to the population of today and tomorrow Demographics Although Edina is growing in size rather slowly, it is aging at a notable pace — with nearly half of the population projected to be 55 or older by the year 2029. Income characteristics reflect levels above state and national rates, suggesting cost is less of a barrier to parks and recreation activities than in other communities. The demographics analysis clearly suggest that addressing Edina's aging population should be a focus for EPRD now and into the future. Similar Providers The similar provider analysis is intended to help the Department understand and plan their role in delivering parks and recreation services amid the landscape of other providers from the public, private, and nonprofit sectors. The analysis identifies potential gaps and overlaps in service delivery and helps the City assess their market share. It can also be used as a tool for the Department to stay competitive in terms of pricing, location, time, and quality of service. One of the key findings from the analysis shows that EPRD is one of the community's few providers of Adaptive Recreation and Adult Athletic programming. And while there are multiple providers of Youth Athletic programming, most do so in collaboration with the EPRD. Areas for ongoing monitoring and coordination include Arts, Senior, Special Event, and Youth programming. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT A critical element of the parks and recreation master planning process is community engagement, which is necessary to effectively deliver a community-oriented parks and recreation system. A balanced, open, and collaborative engagement process builds community-wide trust in the plan and the planning process. Community engagement for this project was carefully planned in order to accurately capture all major community needs and included conducting focus groups, public workshops, stakeholder and staff interviews, and a statistically-valid community survey. Several needs and desired amenities were identified. This list of items and programs was utilized throughout the PARKS, RECREATION & TRAILS STRATEGIC PLAN 9 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Strategic Plan's analysis to inform recommendations and all of the analysis was combined to distinguish between "wish list" items and those that are critical to meeting EPRD's mission and values. Through the exploration of the focus group meetings, the community workshop and the community survey, the following were identified as priorities: • Walking and Biking Trails are a high priority amongst the community, and supported by the City of Edina Park and Recreation staff. Mountain bike trails have also been shown to have strong support. • The community and the Department would like to see increased natural areas within parks, including nature trails, and invasive species control (such as Buckthorn). The Department has been praised for the outstanding service to youth recreation, however with the aging community in mind, many residents would like to see more opportunities for seniors and passive recreation in the parks. Parking is at a premium at parks hosting organized sports. An indoor fitness facility is desired by some in the community, including an indoor walking/jogging track and an indoor pool. Budget and funding is a high priority. It was expressed that alternative funding sources should be explored. Park signage and wayfinding methods are in need of improvement. • The Department leadership is praised and there is an overall satisfaction with the Edina Parks System. 6 LEADERS AMONG BENCHMARKS IN: .• Park acreage/ resident Ice sheet facilities - Cost recovery for operating expenses AVERAGE AMONG BENCHMARKS IN: • Operations budget Capital budget Staffing (operations and programming) Rectangular athletic fields Trails and total trail mileage (near bottom third) BEHIND AMONG BENCHMARKS IN: Indoor recreation space • Capital budget sources Expenditures distributed to planning and development BENCHMARK ANALYSIS A benchmark analysis provides a side-by-side look between EPRD and similar, industry-leading park and recreation systems nationwide in terms of park acreage, recreation facilities, staffing levels, budget, and a variety of other operational metrics. A total of eight benchmark agencies were selected for comparison to Edina based upon comparable demographic characteristics and best practice recognition, such as earning accreditation from the Commission forAccreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies (CAPRA), and placing as finalists or winners of the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) Gold Medal Award. While differences exist in how each agency tracks and reports data, the overall objective of the benchmark analysis is to understand how Edina compares to these peer agencies on key system characteristics and operational measures. Benchmarking is just one of several technical assessment tools used by the planning team to develop recommendations that are specific to Edina's unique circumstances and issues. Results from the benchmark analysis show that Edina is a leader in providing park acreage per resident; in providing ice sheet facilities; and cost recovety for operating expenses. The city ranks in the middle of the benchmark range in terms of operational budget; capital budget; staffing; and rectangular athletic fields. Edina lags behind other benchmark communities in indoor recreation space; trail mileage; capital budget sources; and distribution of expenditures for planning and development. 10 I CITY OF EDINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY LEVEL OF SERVICE The Level of Service Analysis (LOS) produces guidelines that inform investment decisions related to parks, facilities and other built amenities. It puts Edina's inventory of parkland and facilities in terms of"units per population" and creates recommendations based upon National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) guidelines; recreation activity participation rates reported by the Sports & Fitness Industry Association's (SFIA) 2014 Study of Sports, Fitness, and Leisure Participation as it applies to activities that occur in the United States and in the Edina area; community and stakeholder input; the 2014 Community Needs Assessment Survey; and the planning team's observations. The LOS analysis can also help identify future gaps in facilities and services compared to demographic projections. The following is the LOS summary for Edina. PARKS: 2014 Facility Standards 2019 Facility Standards Park Type Meet Standard/ Need Exists Additional Facilities/ Amenities Needed Meet Standard/ Need Exists Additional Facilities/ Amenities Needed Mini Parks Need Exists 7 Acre(s) Need Exists 8 Acre(s) Neighborhood Parks Meets Standard Acre(s) Meets Standard Acre(s) Community Parks Need Exists 21 Acre(s) Need Exists 34 Acre(s) Special-Use Parks Meets Standard Acre(s) Meets Standard Acre(s) Open Space/Greenway Need Exists 27 Acre(s) Need Exists 36 Acre(s) Total Park Acres OUTDOOR AMENITIES: Meets Standard Need Exists 3 Acre(s) Sites(s) Meets Standard Need Exists 3 Acre(s) Sites(s) Picnic Pavilions (Small & Medium) Pavilions (Large & Indoor) Need Exists 2 Sites(s) Need Exists 2 Sites(s) Baseball Fields Need Exists 1 Field(s) Need Exists 2 Field(s) Softball Fields Need Exists 1 Field(s) Need Exists 2 Field(s) Multi-Use Field (Soccer/Lacrosse/Football/Rugby) (Youth Size) Need Exists 2 Field(s) Need Exists 2 Field(s) Multi-Use Field (Soccer/Lacrosse/Football/Rugby) (Adult Size) Need Exists 5 Field(s) Need Exists 1 Field(s) Outdoor Basketball Courts Need Exists 3 Courts) Need Exists 4 Court(s) Tennis Courts Meets Standard Court(s) Meets Standard Court(s) Indoor Ice Sheets Meets Standard Sites(s) Meets Standard Sites(s) Outdoor Ice Sheets Meets Standard Sites(s) Meets Standard Sites(s) Playgrounds (Youth & Tot) Meets Standard Site(s) Meets Standard Site(s) Dog Parks Need Exists 1 Site(s) Need Exists 1 Site(s) Volleyball Pit Need Exists 1 Site(s) Need Exists 2 Site(s) Skate Board Area Meets Standard Site(s) Meets Standard Site(s) Multi-Use Trails (Miles) Need Exists 23 Mile(s) Need Exists 15 Mile(s) Community Gardens Meets Standard Site(s) Meets Standard Site(s) Disc Golf Courses Meets Standard Site(s) Meets Standard Site(s) Outdoor Pools INDOOR AMENITIES: Meets Standard Need Exists 55,252 Sites(s) Square Feet Meets Standard Need Exists 59,008 Sites(s) Square Feet Recreation Centers (Square Feet) Figure 1.1 - Level of Service Summary PARKS, RECREATION & TRAILS STRATEGIC PLAN I 11 43 .1.....X=Se4061e1 0001LS mk• ,r-ne VAULikr. 3amermEm•no MM.@ Vat CITY OF EDINA Palk Classification Somiso itrra Map Figure 1.2 - Park Classification Map EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ENTERPRISE FACILITIES Braemar Braemar Golf Course Braemar Arena Braemar Field Centennial Lakes Edinborough Rosland Edina Aquatic Center Edina Art Center SPECIAL USE PARKS AND FACILITIES Arneson Acres Braemar Bredesen Edina Promenade Frank Tupa Park Nine Mile Creek Trail Van Valkenburg Yorktown Senior Center COMMUNITY PARKS Creek Valley Fred Richards Garden Park Highlands Lewis Pamela Todd Walnut Ridge NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS Alden Arden Cornelia School Countryside Normandale Strachauer Utley Weber Wooddale MINI PARKS Birchcrest Browndale Chowen Fox Meadow Heights Lake Edina McGuire Melody Lake Robert J. Kojetin Sherwood St. John's Tingdale Williams York PARK CLASSIFICATIONS It is important to classify the types of parks located within Edina to understand what functions and facilities currently provided in comparison to those recommended by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA). These classifications are based on NRPA definitions; staff and consultant analysis; and field visits. Defining park classifications helps establish a standard for level of service to the residents and future recommendations on facility development or improvement. The parks were grouped and categorized to assist in planning efforts, level of service expectation, as well as future planning efforts (e.g. facilities standards, maintenance needs, etc.). Figure 1.2 shows the classifications of ERPD parks and the recommended service area. 12 I CITY OF EDINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PARK SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS The following systems were assessed by staff and the consultant team to identify issues and provide recommendations and strategies to create and maintain a level of excellence in the future. Natural resources and sustainable parks; parks, open spaces and trails; recreation facilities; recreation programs; and finance and management were studied in depth with recommendations created for system improvements. The full assessment findings and analysis can be found in the Community Needs Document with detailed inventories of each park located in the Appendix B. These key systems are crucial to maintaining and improving the efficiency and quality of the facilities and services offered by EPRD. The following table is a summary of key recommendations resulting from the assessments. These key recommendations provide considerable input into developing the Strategic Plan Implementation Framework and priority project identification. KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ASSESSMENTS NATURAL RESOURCES & SUSTAINABLE PARKS 1. Hire a Natural Resource Manager to guide natural resource efforts. 2. Complete aNatural Resource Inventory (NRI) forthe City. 3. Provide greater access to natural areas for passive recreation and interpretation. 4. Protect and improve Edina's water resources 5. Providemore environmenatal educational opportunities. 6. Prepare for impacts of climate change. PARKS, OPEN SPACES & TRAILS 1. Build a multi-use trail loop to connect parks. 2. Replace insufficient play areas/ playgrounds and provide new facilities to fill gaps. 3. Improve branding and wayfinding to parks. 4. Provide additional community gathering areas. 5. Develop community driven master• plans for parks. 6. Provide more specialized facilities - dog parks, frisbee golf; etc. RECREATION FACILITIES 1. Consider adding a multi-generational community/ recreation center that is all-inclusive. 2. Replace or decommission community park buildings that have outlived lifespan. 3. Consider relocation of the Edina Art Center to support successful programs. 4. Develop an FFE program for parts, furnishings, etc. to unify aesthetics and streamline maintenance and replacement. RECREATION PROGRAMS 1. Provide a variety of programs that meet community needs and interests and maintain the highest level of excellence. 2. Deliver park and recreation programming more efficiently and effectively utilizing City Staff and partnership with outside agencies like the Edina Community Education. 3. Provide more community building/ socialization programming. FINANCE & MANAGEMENT 1. Improve marketing and communication delivery. 2. Dedicate staff specifically to EPRD marketing and communication. 3. Strengthen financial sustainability. 4. Develop business plans for all enterprise facilities. Figure 1.3 - Key Recommendations from Assessments PARKS, RECREATION & TRAILS STRATEGIC PLAN I 13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDINA TOMORROW TREND ANALYSIS Tracking parks and recreation trends across the country, state, and region help.EPRD maintain a level of excellence in providing opportunities for their residents. A direct correlation exists between the national participatory trends and the local market trends, in that the service area shows a high propensity to engage in recreational activities pertaining to fitness. Based on market potential index figures, the Department should expect residents to participate in fitness activities at a much higher rate than the national average. This would indicate that the Department should offer a wide variety of fitness programming, with a willingness to introduce innovative and trending activities. The local participatory trends also show that residents of Edina attend sporting events and theme parks at a high level, as index figures for these categories are well above average. This demonstrates that the local community is ve►y social and residents enjoy attending a variety of events. From a programming standpoint, this presents an opportunity for the department to offer more special events and excursions, such as day trips for seniors or a community day at the ballpark. From an infrastructure standpoint, EPRD should look to provide facilities that accommodate and encourage this socialization, which corresponds to many other initiatives in the City that strive to further build community. Based on the findings from the demographic and trends analysis, the Department is very fortunate to have an ideal service area. Not only are income characteristics well above average, but the user base also has a strong tendency to spend their time and money on activities that are in the Department's wheelhouse. The future success of the Department will rely heavily on its ability to capitalize on these favorable market conditions by providing facilities, amenities, and programs that are geared toward the needs and interests of the local community. COMMUNITY RECOMMENDED ACTIVITIES AND FACILITIES Additional activities and facilities were identified by the public through the input sessions that directly relate to the changing needs of the community and their expectations for the EPRD. While some of the activities identified currently exist within the park system and are successful or show signs of growth, others were new ideas presented by the public. PICKLE BALL COURTS OUTDOOR SPLASH PADS FRISBEE GOLF ARCHERY RANGE COMMUNITY GARDENS/ URBAN AGRICULTURE INDOOR FITNESS 14 I CITY OF EDINA CLIMATE CHANGE HEALTHY, ACTIVE AGING PA. HEALTH CONSCIOUS & ACTIVE ACCESSIBILITY FOR ALL NATURE AND HEALTH ,e . t .2 • ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHANGING COMMUNITY, CHANGING NEEDS The community needs assessment and trends analysis paints a picture of Edina as a changing community with changing needs. Addressing these needs is a focus of the Strategic Plan and critical for EPRD to continue their high standard of excellence in meeting the Community's needs into the future. The following issues provide a glimpse of how the park system could support residents in the future, and the opportunities and challenges that have emerged during analysis for this Strategic Plan. FINANCIAL COMPETITION YOUTH AND FAMILY FOCUS TIME AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS, RECREATION & TRAILS STRATEGIC PLAN I 15 EXECUTIVE SUM MARY STRATEGY AND PLAN The synthesis of significant data collection and inventories; system analysis; community and staff input; and consultant experience is the creation of the Strategic Plan and Implementation Framework. Full details of the Implementation Framework can be found in Appendix A. The Implementation Framework is broken down by purpose statements, goals, strategies, and tactics that are intended to be a living document; evaluated and updated every 5-years to gauge progress and adapt to changing needs and realities. The Implementation Framework was informed by EPRD's existing vision and mission statements and will be critical to achieving them. The EPRD vision and mission are as follows: EDINA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT VISION To be recognized as having Minnesota's premier parks, recreation and trail system that provides unrivaled opportunities to maximize Edina quality of life by nurturing the health and well-being of our people, our community, our environment, and our econonly. EDINA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT MISSION We create parks facilities, and programs to foster a healthy inclusive community. We accomplish this through creative leadership, collaborations, environmentally sustainable practices, and the responsible use of available resources. GUIDING PRINCIPLES Guiding principles were crafted for the strategic plan to establish the fundamental directives that represent what is desirable for the park system. The principles should remain constant regardless of changes in goals, strategies, and types of projects embarked upon. Park board members and staff developed the following Guiding Principles for the Strategic Plan: Promote community health and wellness for residents in our • Protect Edina's assets through strong financial stewardship parks and programming. and creative funding. Provide excellence and innovation in parks and recreation • Connect residents to park facilities and their programs. services and facilities to meet the needs of the community. • Advance environmental stewardship and conservation to Promote equity and engagement within the parks system and preserve and protect natural resources and build excellence its programs. through sustainability. 16 I CITY OF EDINA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY KEY AREAS OF DEVELOPMENT Five key areas of development have been identified that constitute broad categories of EPRD improvements, activities, and initiatives necessary to implement the Strategic Plan. These areas allow focused investigation and recommendations to be explored that will have the greatest impact on the overall Park system. The key areas of development include: • Natural Resources & Sustainable Parks • Recreation Programs; • Parks, Open Spaces & Trails • Finance & Management • Recreation Facilities IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK Each of the key areas of development are further broken down to create an Implementation Framework that can act as a road map to implementing the Strategic Plan. The following aspects further break down the Key Areas of Development to define the Implementation Framework: • Purpose - statements that recognize the critical elements and over-arching philosophy of approach for each key area of development. • Goals - define the most critical objectives that will need to be focused on under each key areas of development to ensure the purpose is addressed. • Strategies - provide guidance on actions necessary to accomplish the goals. • Tactics - are specified in Appendix A - Implementation Plan and list specific actions to achieve the strategies. The tactics are intended to be actionable items, where progress and timelines can be tracked, evaluated, and modified as needed. Together, the purpose, goals, strategies and tactics are intended to serve as a flexible guide to adapt to changing trends, needs, and City priorities. They should be re-evaluated and updated every 5-years to gauge progress and ensure that the master plan truly serves as a living document, that is dynamic and pro-actively meeting the Community's needs and vision. GUIDING PRINCIPLES KEY 0 Promote community health and wellness by engaging all residents in our parks and programming alcith —VI nZ Provide excellence and innovation in parks and recreation services to meet the needs of the community Develop creative fimding opportunities and programming partnerships to ensure excellence in facilities, programs, and financial stewardship for future generations SS Advance environmental stewardship and conservation to preserve and protect natural resources and build excellence through sustainability C . ) Connect residents to park facilities and their programs OR n Promote social equity and engagement within the parks system and its Figure 1.4 Guiding Principles Key KEY PROJECTS OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN The following key projects have been identified based on community engagement, city staff and park board recommendations, and focus group and stakeholder input. These projects will require a variety of strategies and tactics to achieve - as defined in this document and Appendix A - Implementation Framework. The implementation will require continued efforts from the Park Board, Parks and Recreation Staff, other City Departments and Administration and support from the community. Progress will be evaluated annually and presented in the EPRD Annual Report. The key projects identified are supported by the guiding principles and the icons in Figure 1.4 link the projects back to the applicable guiding principles. PARKS, RECREATION & TRAILS STRATEGIC PLAN 17 scr: 555 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Applicable Guiding Principles: SC11:011:)313# 01k114144 tCAt*5-31) i#M7T:10Th tle/C41 7'11: cCji 006], PiT4Th 1. CREATE A MULTI-USE TRAIL SYSTEM THROUGH THE CITY TO CONNECT PARKS AND ENTERPRISE FACILITIES. 2. EXPLORE A MULTI-GENERATIONAL COMMUNITY CENTER THAT IS ALL-INCLUSIVE. 3. CREATE A NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGER TO GUIDE PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF NATURAL AREAS, ACCESS AND INTERPRETIVE / EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES. 4. IMPROVE MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION DELIVERY. 5. REPLACE OR DECOMMISSION COMMUNITY PARK BUILDINGS THAT HAVE OUTLIVED THEIR DESIGNED LIFESPAN AND ARE CURRENTLY INSUFFICIENT IN PROVIDING SERVICES. 6. RELOCATE THE EDINA ART CENTER TO PROVIDE A FACILITY THAT BEST SUPPORTS THEIR PROGRAMMING NEEDS. 7. REPLACE INADEQUATE AND OUTDATED PLAY AREAS AND PLAYGROUNDS AND PROVIDE NEW FACILITIES TO ADDRESS UNDER SERVED AREAS. 8. IMPROVE BRANDING AND WAYFINDING TO PARKS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND INTERNALLY. 9. STRENGTHEN FINANCIAL SUSTAINABILITY. 10. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY GATHERING AREAS. -1-7) 1 1 . DEVELOP COMMUNITY DRIVEN MASTER PLANS FOR PARKS THROUGHOUT THE SYSTEM. 12. DEVELOP BUSINESS PLANS FOR ALL ENTERPRISE FACILITIES THROUGHOUT THE PARK SYSTEM. 18 I CITY OF EDINA /1e, (4t,i1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PROGRESS MEASUREMENT Measuring progress of the Implementation Framework and overall park system is valuable, to justify and validate funds, staff time, and overall progress. Regular evaluations can help EPRD continually gauge which improvements better serve system users and provide excellence for the Park system. EPRD already conducts some periodic evaluation of its services, including surveys distributed to members of the community, recreation program participants and users of its fee based services. Collecting both quantitative and qualitative data will be important for EPRD to evaluate their progress and the overall system. Additionally, EPRD will be reviewing the Implementation Framework annually in order to update the Board, Council and community on progress toward the strategic implementation framework and Priority Projects identified in this plan. An annual report will be the primary communication tool and document generated by EPRD in this effort. LIVING DOCUMENT The premier park and recreation system in Minnesota will not only measure progress by assessing community needs and satisfaction, but will also adapt to meet those changing needs. Recreation is dynamic and is constantly changing. New recreation activities and equipment emerge (in-line skates, the mountain bike, etc.) and recreation trends ebb and flow. Inherently, this means flexible and adaptive facilities and programs. It also means regular review and refinement of the Strategic Plan based on community feedback. Annual review of this plan is necessary to make sure that priority projects, recommendations, and the implementation framework are still relevant and updated to reflect progress is an essential component of becoming the premier park and recreation system in Minnesota. HARITIALFEESOLIOC. GOAL 2 -22-EaTE WiarE FE:Sr/JEW r2r0 SiCarft 25 NO lairriSAPES Man:an eras:race b 10ark mahanaia 7 criarnaaA con., • to .Pere eVrormalbly IrwAV a.... pac-r.,, err, ,xra.....• a I a-eas rraieernxe e.gr.r.s ero d ilat, Tan. atartnan Irriplari Year Parkanrccre lama. 21.1 Fear. acaniarrirtatans el 2.2012 UM i,cira 2015 lifnian via. 4 rem.. ca.i.V0n. 212 &Wax res-rana PI Clerbl iritie.as ins tirrIgnas .....-44 2015 Crean aring mama. and port in ger/tire, 0, 0ressalians throrraxia Gan 212 C2 -0.1ak ar,./ tarn 11 a-4,52122.1[2g Lana cc., Lererincr ear awn rra ramaare vs. rulral amas ani arrrixiacata reruns 27 Perk Bard Orr Canaval, ani11,262 2012 Cie. imanting malaria, and past in perk eraltirg'or laraarnliars 1.2512. Gra 221 10..1 .7.apares es ',sang ,mangys02.2 II raasint, If, C., Ina narean. ha,. anl rranrrrar Aare rnarianaad • seek a.Canit.Cliala gam 2016 Ca,. 1 roam Val clarmenYeon gasten in pair. 1.5 Pon.Iraarg,r Park latersanceenn to max.. 0,u, r.. pd,y 0 ral,e1r..--......s.,,,re,n, 201 7 tlraral 'war= rrinnagantr2 (.1 ilinred tr.-4a 226 Gen., hang na,. g r.as o vri sa anin naa n9aaa 2. aaOrVo 2017 a y.: .7, a 12arennarreadt,ra a snfrAnngscsfloop,..tad n m1 is,,,,.2 0? 2,2. o>,,nurs susr.... parks Autloals kintrucege th d re rEzTfol to rr,ca of dorsa don, 2,,,,,,, InsarrnerniMan War Parlanamain liessua 221 Certact nem..., . nasaarn-sa for, Ina, 1a.arrs. cute wa2sturin, and anainsan,..10, is 20. Compare crinen rrersa rriaarar.arinna_ 2 ....a...V....an arreci. intaa. or dau Nage en. pa, aistem - coadnata nth Pub, 1 tanste dr. 2017 Cananasra_smaa . crmnrackainn risit 2.23 Ike ale Sta2ranain 51.111a12 23111-3.) as a Bidekit, rev 2, clinstaurea: rid ram, an] 2...aa3 rig oprafraa plan WES' a . 'ran—, ant s» aarvilierato 21E0 and a . inert Geriiiaarannae mrd °Ware siratira,tr rang a's., ler aa Wriscann maw anlahatikaleaali 2017 l2.7a MI 0.01.111 focal reared rnara rarraaran Para.. 22. 1.1222i1Lesdersho in Ertagy Eria pnagn 02.0. !Formal's ea r.saina ri,riar1ani,rial ..., 0a.lanriga la 0..ide is parks 2ral trc.`ens ancyinani r nrel r const.....1 rvr.dez. Pro,r, e.egy crr....4-, unar conscriaaan and mina trardeg liectitas sta area cost inpacia 20. larrnarain Waal ma:Ca' raans and a...pm.. g.ides.t...1... rants] rarist_nna. fle,-..E. 3cArcetratm for me flu... Figure 1.5 - Implementation Framework PARKS, RECREATION & TRAILS STRATEGIC PLAN I 19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CONCLUSION AND NEXT STEPS The Edina Parks and Recreation Department (EPRD) has provided City residents with excellent parks and recreation facilities that are currently well used and appreciated by the community. Moving forward, additional actions are required to maintain a quality system and stay ahead of the park infrastructure and asset needs of the Department. Improving the existing park system to address underserved populations and changing needs will ensure the system continues to meet the high expectations of Edina's residents. For each element of key development areas the Strategic Plan outlines many recommendations, which will require government and resident support. These recommendations address un-met community needs and expectations and have been cross referenced with other existing City programs. The Strategic Plan is intended to support and provide synergies with efforts such as the City's Comprehensive Plan; Vision Edina; Bike Edina; Living Streets; Active Routes to School; Neighborhood Small Area Plans; and several other programs currently underway in the City. The Strategic Plan highlights the importance of creating master plans for several existing parks, and how these efforts will contribute to the overall success and sustainability of the system. The Implementation Framework will inform, and be informed by, these master plans and other planning projects throughout the city. Intended to be a "living document", EPRD staff can utilize the Implementation Framework to track progress and modify to meet changing needs, realities, and opportunities available. This Strategic Plan allows the department to manage proactively. EPRD has become a major service provider to the community and has helped develop one of the key quality of life components that make the City of Edina such a great place to live, work, and play. Community support follows great vision and the Strategic Plan is a critical step in communicating EPRD's vision to the City. 20 CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA Budget & CIP June 13, 2017 CITY OF EDINA Included all enterprise & other funds in budget book implemented 2-yearbudget cycle Introduced City and Department workplans Prioritized CIP according to strategic objectives ICMA performance measures Implemented Hubble budget module Improved performance measures Reorganized budget book & won the GFOA award for budgets Added more details in CIP project narratives forbetter clarity Expanded City Manager's message and added Citizen's Report Won second consecutive GFOA award for budget Updated CIP funding sources for better clarity El 6/13/2017 CITY OF EDINA s Budget Timeline • April Budget Managers enter budgets & comments in Hubble. May 12 Department Heads review budgets & comments entered in Hubble by Budget Managers.Malce changes as necessary. April 17 ELT Retreat— develop proposal for Workplan Themes & Key Performance Indicators. April 27 Council Retreat— develop 2018-2019 Work Plan Themes June 1 Department Heads finalize Hubble budgets/comments and forward updated budget book narratives to Finance. Finance reviews Hubble & budgetbook narratives. City Managerreviews surnmaryand directs revisions as necessary. July 12 ELT reviews 2018-2019 budget draft. August 2 City Managerpresents 2018-2019 budgetproposal to City Council at work session. Sept &Dec Coundl adopts preliminary (Sept) and final (Dec) levy and budget. CITY OF EDINA Budget vs. CIP • $20,000 threshold • CIP — Very similar two year process to budget. • CIP Request Form submitted for each CIP project • Director Ranking Form — Fiscal, Health, Economic, Community, Strategy and Opportunity • Approximately 80 projects requested in 2016 for 2017 - 2021 CITY 01: EDINA 2018-2019 Budget Plan Hubble is our internal communication platform — Budget Manager/Contributor enters numbers for 2017 estimate, 2018 budget and 2019 budget. — Use comment fields for description — Department Head approves Hubble by June 1. — Finance compiles, reviews & reports results. — Review with finance committee on June 29. Wages & benefits estimates are prepared by Finance and HR. This is based on past staffing. — New FT hire form is completed if requesting a new FT employee. CITY OF EDINA €83 Eltli , _ 2018-2019 Budget Plan (Cont.) • The budget book is our external communication platform. • Department Heads updated the narrative for each department in the budget book by June 1. — Accomplishments — Goals — Performance Measures — Review Org charts COASInatem 6/13/2017 2 6/13/2017 CITY OF EDINA Budget • Recreation Administration • Recreation Programming • ParkMaintenance • Aquatic Center • Arena • Braemar Field • Art Center • Arts & Culture — Public Art & Concerts • Braemar Golf Course • Braemar Memorial Fund • Centennial Lakes • Edinborough Park CITY OF EDINA Questions? Cdr.L'aintea 3 Board/Commission: Park Board 2017 Annual Work Plan Initiative Council Charge 1 q 1 q 2 03 q 4 N New Initiative q Continued Initiative q Ongoing Responsibility Target Completion Budget Required Staff Support Required Date (Staff Liaison) (Staff Liaison) Dec. 2017 $0 Ann Kattreh — 40 hours Arden Park Natural Resource Plan Progress Report: Julie Strother and Eileen McAwley Initiative Council Charge Target Completion Budget Required Staff Support Required 2 q 1 q 2 03 q 4 Date (Staff Liaison) (Staff Liaison) 10 New Initiative q Continued Initiative q Ongoing Responsibility Dec. 2017 $0 Ann Kattreh — 160 hours, Susan Faus, 100 hours & Janet Canton - 40 hours, Park Maintenance — 20 hours Braemar Park Master Plan Progress Report: Greg Good, Brenda McCormick, Mike Miller, Ben Gustafson Initiative Council Charge 3 q 1 q 2 03 q 4 q New Initiative 0 Continued Initiative q Ongoing Responsibility Target Completion Date Oct. 2017 Budget Required (Staff Liaison) $0 Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Ann Kattreh — 160 hours, Susan Faus, 100 hours & Janet Canton - 40 hours, Park Maintenance — 20 hours Fred Richards Master Plan Progress Report: Eileen McAwley, Matt Dahlien, Dan Gieseke, Greg Good Katherine Hulbert, Koren Nelson (alternate due to quorum) Initiative Council Charge Target Completion Budget Required Staff Support Required 4 q 1 1112 q 3 q 4 Date (Staff Liaison) (Staff Liaison) q New Initiative N Continued Initiative q Ongoing Responsibility July 2017 $0 Susan Faus — 120 hours, Janet Approved by Council 12/6/16 December 2017 ZI New Initiative q Continued Initiative q Ongoing Responsibility Assist as requested with development of the City's new Comprehensive Guide Plan. Initiative Council Charge 6 q 1 q 2 qX3 q 4 Target Completion Budget Required Staff Support Required Date (Staff Liaison) (Staff Liaison) Target Completion Budget Required Date (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Progress Report: Park Board Initiative Council Charge 5 q I. qX2 q 4 Park Signage Replacement Project Canton — 40 hours, Ann Kattreh — 40 hours Progress Report: Mike Miller, Trevor Mohs, Koren Nelson, Dan Gieseke New Initiative q Continued Initiative q Ongoing Responsibility December 2017 $0 Weber Woods Master Plan [Partner with St. Louis Park] Progress Report: Matt Dahlien, Brenda McCormick, Koren Nelson, Julie Strother Proposed Month for Joint Work Session (one time per year, up to 60 minutes): April Approved by Council 12/6/16 PARK ASSIGNMENTS Matt Dahlien — (7 parks) Birchcrest Highlands Rosland Van Valkenburg Weber Woods Tingdale Utley Dan Gieseke — (5 parks) Arneson Acres Centennial Lakes Cornelia School Edinborough Rosland Greg Good — (7 parks) Fred Richards Fox Meadow Strachauer Van Valkenburg Walnut Ridge Williams Wooddale Ben Gustafson — (3 parks) Countryside Heights Normandale Katherine Hulbert — (4 parks) Arneson Acres Cornelia School Garden Strachauer Eileen McAwley — (6 parks) Arden Bredesen Fred Richards Highlands Todd Weber Woods Brenda McCormick - (4 parks) Browndale Fox Meadow Garden Pamela Miller — (5 parks) Braemar Bredesen Creek Valley Lewis McGuire Koren Nelson — (6 parks) Alden Arden Countryside Melody Lake Tupa Weber Julie Strother — (8 parks) Chowen Grandview Square Kojetin Pamela Sherwood Utley York Yorktown Unassigned Parks — (4 parks) Heights Park Normandale Park St. John's Park York Park Park Adopt-a-Park/Adopted By Park Board Member(s) Assigned Alden Park Kaiser and Blackman Families Nelson Arden Park Arden Park Neighbor Assoc. McAwley and Nelson Arneson Acres Park Edina Garden Council Gieseke and Hulbert Birchcrest Park OPEN Dahlien Bredesen Park OPEN McAwley and Miller Browndale Park Browndale Park Association McCormick Chowen Park Wells Fargo Global Fund Services Strother Cornelia School Park Sprague Family Gieseke and Hulbert Countryside Park Edina Democrats Gustafson and Nelson Creek Valley School Park Edina KIDS Club - Creek Valley Miller Fox Meadow Park OPEN Good and McCormick Garden Park Musolf, Goldman and Saxton Families Hulbert and McCormick Grandview Square Park Residents of Grandview Sq. I, II & Ill Strother Heights Park Families of Heights Park Gustafson Highlands Park Bruce Carlson Dahlien and McAwley Kojetin Park Gateway Bank Strother Lake Edina Park Edina Robotics First Team 1816 Good and McCormick Lewis Park Dow Water & Process Solutions Miller McGuire Park OPEN Miller Melody Lake Park OPEN Nelson Normandale Park Tradition Gustafson Pamela Park Edina Girls Fastpitch Association McCormick and Strother Rosland Park The North Face - Galleria/Edina Dahlien and Gieseke St. John's Park The Voreis Team @ Keller Williams Realty Sherwood Park OPEN Strother Strachauer Park Strachauer Park Neighborhood Assn. Good and Hulbert Tingdale Park OPEN Dahlien Todd Park Neighbors of Todd Park McAwley Tupa Park Briggs Family Nelson Utley Park Rotary Club of Edina Dahlien and Strother Van Valkenburg Park Dog Park Scoopy Poo Dahlien and Good Walnut Ridge Park Parkwood Knolls Association Good Weber Park Calvin Christian School Nelson Williams Park OPEN Good Wooddale Park Edina Noon Rotary Good York Park Nunn Family Strother Yorktown Park OPEN Strother City Council Updates By Scott Neal May 16, 2017 • Approved a new five-year beverage services agreement with PepsiCo. • Adopted a proclamation declaring May 20 to be National Kids to Parks Day in Edina. • Authorized staff to proceed with the park signage replacement project, replacing most of the city’s current park signs at a cost of $500,000. June 6, 2017 • Agreed to sell $7.4 million of general obligation funds to Raymond James & Associates of St. Petersburg, Florida, to fund projects at the City’s aquatic center and golf course. The average interest rate for the bonds will be 2.26 percent. • Awarded a $55,003 consulting contract to SRF Consulting to prepare the Braemar Park master plan. Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 1:42 PM To: Ann Kattreh Subject: FW: Arden Park Improvement Plan-Attention: Mayor and City Council Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Ginny Anderson [mailto:ginny4@me.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 1:30 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Improvement Plan-Attention: Mayor and City Council Dear Mayor and City Council: On behalf of several of my neighbors surrounding Arden Park, I, a 22 year resident in Arden Park, have been urged to notify you each of our neighborhood's deep support in favor of this incredible and long overdue Arden Park Improvement Plan. Our wonderful neighborhood families have enjoyed this very special public park through all phases of our families' growth. A singular continuing lament through these many years has been the lack of a few enhancements we have so wished for that are welcomingly addressed in the proposal now before you. Specially, with the new Minnehaha Creek bridge and road construction completed, it makes sense to take the opportunity to remove the dam, improve the creek water quality, and reduce the threat of flooding as discussed in the proposal. Additionally, the current Arden Park Shelter building as it stands has been an eye soar to an otherwise charming neighbor park. The ice rink is one of the park's great assets with its unique setting among the trees and separated from the hidden hockey rink over the bridge. The new playground will provide years of joy and entertainment to the remarkable number of new residents with small children whom have been moving into the neighborhood. We understand as a civically minded community, there will be some who find objection to aspects of the Arden Park Improvement Plan. However, the overwhelming benefits to the neighborhood and the opportunity to take advantage of funding presented through the Watershed District is more than sufficient to compel the Mayor and City Council to vote in favor of this very important project. Thank you for the time and important consideration of this invaluable opportunity to significantly impact the Arden Park neighborhood. Sincerely, Ginny Anderson 5029 Indianola Avenue 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 11:04 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Improvements Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Susan Brown [mailto:sbrown@visi.com] Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 8:36 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Improvements To the Parks and Rec Department - Thank you for your thoughtful plans to improve Arden Park. I am particularly impressed with your initiative to work with the Minnehaha Watershed District on this project. It is wonderful to see the synergies of both the talent and economic resources. I am excited that the new Arden Park will have better human access to the creek, while making the creek healthier overall. And I am thrilled that that storm water issue (the oh so less glamorous part of the re-do) is being addressed. There are a few who would like to see the damn saved. I am not one of them. The damn does have a sweet old-timey feel. Given the larger the needs of the community, I can see the future of a better park and creek without the damn. Best, Sue Susan Brown 5528 Halifax Lane Edina, MN 612.670.5644 susanpampersandpartners.conn 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 11:05 AM Subject: FW: 54th street dam Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Ann Kattreh. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Judy Carver [mailto:iudycarver@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2017 3:27 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: 54th street dam Please please reconsider the decision to take away the dam! If you could see all the kids and adults there fishing and enjoying the spot below the dam, I can't see how you could vote to remove it! Judy Carver Sent from my iPhone 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 12:50 PM Subject: FW: Save the Waterfall at 54th street Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Lisa Turner [mailto:Lisa@turnerhospitality.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 12:01 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: DJ Turner Subject: Save the Waterfall at 54th street To the Parks and Rec Commission and the Edina City Council, I grew up 3 blocks away from the waterfall, we've had family photos there for years. Its such a peaceful and serene walk around and through Arden Park. The city installed sidewalks just so people could enjoy walking over the waterfall. We often see ducks and Egrets swimming and fishing for food near the waterfall. Why, after all this time is taking it out a necessity? It doesn't sound like the residents were consulted and it's an added cost when our property tax dollars are skyrocketing. Please consider whether this is a necessity. At least take the time to listen to the local reaction. There should be a really good reason to spend the money and change something that has been around for as long as I can remember. We currently walk by several times a week and live a few blocks away. Thank you for your consideration, Lisa Turner 29 Woodland Road 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 2:03 PM Subject: FW: Arden Park Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 - IbiunnoEdinaMN.qov I EdinaMN.gov From: Stephanie Oyen [mailto:stephanieoyen@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2017 1:15 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park To the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council, My family recently moved to Edina and live 8 blocks from Arden Park. We were delighted to discover this park as it is one of the few "unmanicured" areas in Edina. It's truly a city treasure and we have spent countless hours fishing in the creek. I was dismayed to hear of a plan to disrupt this vibrant section of the creek. I do not believe that there have been any scientific studies to back up the need to alter the creek. I strongly urge you to reconsider these plans until there has been time for public comment and study. Thank you. Stephanie 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 10:57 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Dam Removal Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoAEdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Michael Bahr [mailto:mbahr54©hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 1:19 PM To: Renae Clark; Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson Cc: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: Re: Arden Park Dam Removal Dr. Michael S. Bahr 5417 Woodcrest Drive Edina, MN 55424 May 20, 2017 Re: Arden Park construction project Dear Ms. Renae Clark and Jessica Wilson Vanderwerff: I have several concerns about the Arden Park construction project. Your proposal is to remove the dam located at the 54thstreet bridge. Along with many others, I enjoy the dam as it is and I do not want it removed. Further, as a resident living just downstream from the dam, if in fact the dam is removed, then I have concerns, as follows: 1. This dam has been in place (likely) for over 80 years. Regarding the sediment stored behind this dam: • Did you quantify the amount of sediment stored? • For this stored sediment, has contaminate testing been performed? • How does the proposed design manage for this sediment? 2. If the dam is removed, how will your plan utilize the loss in grade that occurs at the dam? 3. Do you plan to simply install a rock rapids/ramp in its place? 4. If not, where & how do you plan to distribute bed grade control through the project? 1 5. Has an Environment Assessment Worksheet or Environmental Impact Statement been performed? If so, how can I review and comment on these? 6. When the restored channel plan is established, can I please review the channel and floodplain design? I know that you have put a lot of time and effort into this project. My inquiries are all made to ensure the success of this project, that it fits into our community's desires and is best for our valuable resource. Thank you for your cooperation, and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Dr. Michael Bahr 2 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:23 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Restoration Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Bodin, Anne [mailto:anne.bodin@sirva.com] Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 7:24 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Restoration Dear Park and Recreation Commission/City Counsel, We are writing to share our lack of support of the proposed Arden Park modification by the Watershed District. As residents who live on the creek (and are impacted by the creek re-routing proposal) we enjoy the immense wildlife outside our back door daily. The idea of changing the creek's flow and destroying wildlife habitats is completely unnecessary. We enjoy the eagles, ducks, cranes, deer and countless other animals everyday. Beyond destroying our amazing view we feel the changes could impact home values along the area of the creek we live on and therefore real estate tax revenue. We ask that you please hear the voice of your residents and stop this plan from moving forward. Thank you so much for your consideration! Anne and Jake Bodin 5032 Bruce Place, Edina, MN CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the original message and all copies from your computer. 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:30 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Plan Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. 41\1, Lynette Biunno, Receptionist E g 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoPEdinaMN.qov I EdinaMN.gov From: julie turnbull [mailto:jhturnbull(ahotmail.conn] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 2:55 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Plan City Council Members: We have lived in the neighborhood near Arden Park for almost 40 years. We are avid canoeists/kayakers; nordic walkers and lovers of the outdoors. Every summer, multiple times, we paddle Minnehaha Creek from Minnetonka to our house on Halifax Lane. We are very familiar with all aspects of the creek and parks surrounding it. The plan for updating Arden Park, as put forth by the Watershed District and Edina Park Dept. is a perfect solution for the neighborhood. It addresses many of the concerns and requests from the neighbors. The fact that a few folks think the fishing area on the creek is going away is detracting from the positive aspects of the plan. We ask that you approve the plan as presented to the community May 1. Thanks for your consideration Julie and Andy Turnbull 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 9:33 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Waterfall Plans Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist \ 41 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoCa I EdinaMN.gov From: Tom Ewers [mailto:tomewers@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2017 5:10 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Waterfall Plans Hello - Please send to the Edina City Council and Parks & Recreation Commission: I live at 5308 Kellogg Ave, which is just a few blocks from the creek and Arden Park that the commission plans to adjust with it's latest plan. While there are definitely many improvements to this area that can be made given it's age, disrupting the natural ecosystem is not one of them in our opinion. I can't tell you how special it is to see kids playing in the creek and falls area each day when my kids and I walk the dog or ride our bikes along the bridge. This time of year, it's also increasingly fun to see the water flow so rapidly and the amount of fisherman that come to this area to catch some impressive fish, all in the confines of a residential area. That is something that is extremely unique and it would be a shame if a design commission looks to over-engineer an update to the area by taking away the very "nature" that it embodies. I urge you to listen to the feedback of the direct residents of the area as this is a park that is used by the residents of this area more exclusively vs. other parks (Pamela, Todd, Wooddale, etc.) and it's untouched aspects are some of the best parts of it. People live in this area because it's quiet, it doesn't have cut through streets and yes, the park is hard to get too for those outside of walking distance, but that's the point. We have such a beauty of in this area that having a raw nature. Regards, 1 Tom & Kristen Ewers 5308 Kellogg Ave. 2 Dr. Michael S. Bahr 5417 Woodcrest Drive Edina, MN 55424 May 20, 2017 Re: Arden Park construction project Dear Ms. Renae Clark and Jessica Wilson Vanderwerff: I have several concerns about the Arden Park construction project. Your proposal is to remove the dam located at the 54thstreet bridge. Along with many others, I enjoy the dam as it is and I do not want it removed. Further, as a resident living just downstream from the dam, if in fact the dam is removed, then I have concerns, as follows: 1. This dam has been in place (likely) for over 80 years. Regarding the sediment stored behind this dam: • Did you quantify the amount of sediment stored? • For this stored sediment, has contaminate testing been performed? • How does the proposed design manage for this sediment? 2. If the dam is removed, how will your plan utilize the loss in grade that occurs at the dam? 3. Do you plan to simply install a rock rapids/ramp in its place? 4. If not, where & how do you plan to distribute bed grade control through the project? 5. Has an Environment Assessment Worksheet or Environmental Impact Statement been performed? If so, how can I review and comment on these? 6. When the restored channel plan is established, can I please review the channel and floodplain design? I know that you have put a lot of time and effort into this project. My inquiries are all made to ensure the success of this project, that it fits into our community's desires and is best for our valuable resource. Thank you for your cooperation, and I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, Dr. Michael Bahr 3 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:12 PM Subject: FW: Arden Park Dam Removal Attachments: Final Concept Perspective.pdf; Arden Park City Council Fact Sheet 05_2017_web2.pdf Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Renae Clark [mailto:RCIark@minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Monday, May 22, 2017 4:17 PM To: Michael Bahr; Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson Cc: James Hovland; Mary Brindle; Mike Fischer; Kevin Staunton; Robert Stewart Subject: RE: Arden Park Dam Removal Dear Dr. Bahr, We appreciate your email and thoughtful questions below. Thanks for the opportunity to respond. The Arden Park concept plan does include removal of the dam at W. 54th street while integrating creek restoration, stormwater management and recreational improvements (in-stream and within the park). In recent weeks we have heard that the community values the sound and aesthetic of the water falls that the dam creates and the good fishing below the dam. The integrated investment in the park is intended to accomplish natural resources goals in addition to better visual and physical connections to the creek throughout the 10 acre park, particularly in the north half where the creek is not very visible or accessible except at the pedestrian bridge crossing. There will be flowing water throughout the park, enhanced access for fishing, and a safer canoe/kayak/tubing loop (with no portage across the street) indicated as the dotted line in the creek on the concept plan in the north part of the park. The greenspace in the park will be dryer and more usable. Overall the project provides benefits to natural resources and the community throughout this park. Here is a link to the project website http://www.minnehahacreek.org/project/arden-park-restoration and a project information sheet is attached. I've also attached a concept level rendering that depicts a view across the creek looking towards Minnehaha Ave and the proposed new shelter building and greenspace area. Responses to your questions are highlighted as follows: 1. This dam has been in place (likely) for over 80 years. Regarding the sediment stored behind this dam: Did you quantify the amount of sediment stored? • The amount of sediment stored will be quantified during the final design phase. The current impounded sediment has been included in the overall earthwork computations for costing purposes, which currently estimates approximately 8,400 cubic yards of removed material. For this stored sediment, has contaminate testing been performed? • Not yet, but will be completed this summer per MPCA requirements in advance of the initiation of final design. How does the proposed design manage for this sediment? • Depending on the impounded sediment testing results, the sediment would either remain on site or be transported off site. 1 2. If the dam is removed, how will your plan utilize the loss in grade that occurs at the dam? • The new stream will be at least 400 feet longer to make of the grade difference 3. Do you plan to simply install a rock rapids/ramp in its place? • No. The grade can be made up to a greater or lesser degree throughout the approx.. 2,000 feet of channel length. A design consideration could incorporate a rock vein in the creek at that location near the W. 54th St. bridge and keep some slope steepness in this area. The concept design considers putting slope steepness of the creek in the north half of the park for a tubing/canoe/paddle board loop as part of an active recreation area. (with the southern half of the park generally more passive). It is possible to do both. 4. If not, where & how do you plan to distribute bed grade control through the project? • Where the slope steepness goes in a newly constructed creek channel is a design detail as noted in my response to #3. 5. Has an Environment Assessment Worksheet or Environmental Impact Statement been performed? If so, how can I review and comment on these? • An EAW would be part of the design development process and the public does have the opportunity to review and comment. 6. When the restored channel plan is established, can I please review the channel and floodplain design? • As part of the design process there will be an opportunity for public input — likely through a community meeting. This would occur at a 60% design phase. You can also meet with me individually or just request the information for your own review. Thank you again for the opportunity to respond. Please reply or call if you would like to discuss further. Renae Renae Clark Planner & Project Manager Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka, MN, 55345 Direct: 952-641-4510 Office: 952-471-0590 www.minnehah•creek.o g From: Michael Bahr [mailto:mbahr54@hotmail.corn] Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 1:19 PM To: Renae Clark <RCIark@minnehahacreek.org>; Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson <Iwilson@edinannn.gov> Cc: ihovland@EdinaMN.gov; mbrindle@EdinaMN.gov; mfischer@EdinaMN.gov; kstaunton@EdinaMN.gov; rstewart@EdinaMN.gov Subject: Re: Arden Park Dam Removal 2 IMPROVING ARDEN PARK 7 WWW.MINNEHAHACREEK.ORG/ARDEN-PARK RENAE CLARK • MCWD • RCLARK@MINNEHAHACREEK.ORG • (952) 641-4510 JESSICA WILSON • CITY OF EDINA • JWILSON@EDINAMN.GOV • (952) 826-0445 WHAT WILL CHANGE? • Removes the pre-1938 four foot dam, improving passage for paddlers and fish • Adds approximately 500 feet of stream through existing wetlands and floodplain • Potential to treat over 100 acres of regional stormwater • Addresses scientifically-documented impairments to improve the index of biological integrity (IBI) and biota* • Contributes to more consistent creek flow • Improves habitat for fish, birds, and other wildlife • New walking trails and potential new bridges • New park building • Drier and more usable lawn area • Retains existing playground and ice skating area • New areas to sit and enjoy natural beauty of the creek FUNDING There are currently no funding commitments from either the City of Edina or MCWD. The total project cost is approximately $4 million. We anticipate that the project cost would be shared across the project partners and would qualify for some grant funding. The CITY of 0 EDINA 50.ANHOIERSARY MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT QUALITY OF WATER, QUALITY OF LIFE *2003 Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment and the 2013 Total Maximum Daily Load Study for Minnehaha Creek www.minnehahacreek.org FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS WHY ARDEN PARK? Arden Park would be the latest in a series of improvements along Minnehaha Creek working to restore the creek from Minnetonka to Minneapolis in a way that connects people and communities to a vibrant, healthy, beautiful natural resource. WHY REMOVE THE DAM? Minnehaha Creek is listed on the state's impaired waters list due to low dissolved oxygen, high chloride, and high E. coli bacteria which has led to poor biological communities.* Over the last century, the creek has been ditched, dammed, wetlands filled, and urban runoff has increased. The dam exacerbates the impact of runoff on the creek by warming water, increasing algal growth, accumulating decaying vegetation, and hindering fish spawning and foraging. WHY NOW? The Arden Park project is a collaboration between MCWD and the City of Edina originating back to 2014 when the city reconstructed area streets and the 54th Street bridge. The project layers natural resource benefits with community goals and plans and maximizes public investment. WHAT WILL CHANGE? Currently, the area around the dam is energized with activity, but the areas upstream are not accessible. The project will bring energy and access throughout the park, along with new proposed amenities (see reverse and right). The plan does not call for filling in the fishing hole below the dam, but the hole will fill naturally over time as the creek moves sediment. Fishing will still be accessible along the creek. COMMUNITY INPUT We hosted 3 public meetings and asked for comments online to solicit community input. Public input informed the final draft concept (see reverse) . Existing Pat Proposed Stairs Landing Park Shelte & Viewing Terrace OVERLOOK PARK 1..51..f.11.ron.. 427 Proposed BoardWalk ARDEN PARK * 1.11 , I UV, • . ,11;1:: 1'. : 1 •s: HA ETIHOWE ATOM ARDEN PARK CONCEPT PLAN NI, I. 201, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) is a regional unit of government that collaborates with public and private partners to protect and improve land and water in the 181 square mile Minnehaha Creek watershed. MINNEHAHA GREENWAY Arden Park would be the latest in a series of improvements along Minnehaha Creek that is returning the formerly ditched and ignored stream into a vibrant, healthy and beautiful natural resource that connects and enhances the communities it flows through. The project will complement this work by enhancing wildlife habitat, treating polluted stormwater, adding flood storage and improving access for recreation. ••• Pre • „de ' :Alei g1101.1-.41 •••••• "14'Lle". r -I ,.••••- N 3 • • `z•-•' -.4P 7-A•• ‘-rti //,; , • '.,„,;‘.,,-....•7•••___rjx••-, !CV ---‘‘r --• a - , t ••,`:L-• • 7•-e, ^-:• fi • • !••• S 117:- - r- Irtfri • 6-• - ••••-r„ •q4, • r ,1" ,=-1Y§` ' - • • 14/i/ '1' 1 • ;"1„i ▪ 1:i. w••• %•< Va,91261.P • , IV/ -.-:t7t1// l'• (// , • :71 ./ rV p4 -_,---,--_,----',--T.: 7,r •_,,-c--.‹ : , 0 _ 11.. ,-4( ' , , VIN• 1-7//j(re' , , _14 ,. , L-4- _....-_,,,,.,._,_. -=<'—‘1,••r,r-.4-• - ..7,-4, --1 g---,- • _ _.- •••-<, • 1 ti ;1/47 - 4' i ,n' z-- ,.-:,5,•• , , • ' ' ••••• . , ;-;,.4.17 -.-----;), -----v-, { — ; • < 1 V s'i .- --'- - >1241,0 '1,121-41 j/ - (,.t r of ./„.1,/ ff. ) ' ,•... !.....),j4 - ,::_. •,_,... ,„,:.'"'..\_7.7.4,-i, '? ,:i'•• ' „*._:,,,,. , ,::::„._, ,: -,-,f __ „9 -- "ci'yl,./i.p. — / i 'r4i, ' -','. ti -, i,":„.tt, r. ..,5-5__;., ..„;*. :;.4:1 , "•;_,-,„,..,.,..z.„t.,i'L ..,, . , ......1---„,.., ...,:.•••:,.„-, - __"-',, 9 0_ c,. . • tp.,-, .2\ 42::(.. r-„ ,,,t, -„,t.„4,0.H--;•.-A i . ''`Tr ;c------r.,-3(4-•,----.1,)'-,--7;.-„•1‘,,v .`.A- ,-f--, ,,..,,, -4-2, .i C.71A1, V- 3 ' ‘.-) ri't-----;-- ..,••1" # - t11 ..„, , ..„4,,, .I. ' 1111 ir:AliilliP' . '‘' — - • ik-v= >. •-••-• - ti • 7./ ti 2. 111•'.Z.,‘ J . !•• 1%.5 • c- —A X • ;•1: /, , 4 s' t •••••••"4 er Nk • • - • • . • . "?/Y- -1•0.-Lt; ••slt1 14- -1- • - •.) L., :3 • 1-1\147/1.- - sr • • il I 1;.= .-C„,\•/ . \I t* 1. '45 • ▪ ; I I •,( .0-4),430 I —4 • 4' • JC -47 • • • V•-"?' " • `• . yr , 4 '7").? i • 11 A HART HOWERTON ARDEN PARK PARK SHELTER AND VIEWING TERRACE Edina, Minnesota May 1, 2017 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:10 PM Subject: FW: Save the Falls at 54th Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: BRH [mailto:burtonrandall@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:36 PM To: James Hovland Subject: Save the Falls at 54th Hi, Mr. Mayor. I've lived in the Arden neighborhood for 43 years and respectfully urge you to do what you can to "save" the falls at 54th in substantially the condition it's in. I walk by it every day on my Arden walk on Wooddale, West 50th, Arden/Bruce, West 54th -- "the daily circle." Some things ought to stay the same in this too-rapidly- changing world. "The Falls" is one of Edina's landmarks, worth preserving, like the other falls, the farm house at 4400 W. 50th, the Grange Hall, Wooddale bridge, Grandpa Al and Grandma Franny's magical corner for kids at Morningside and Crocker (if you haven't visited it, you ought to), the Edina Theater, etc. Sincerely, Burton Hanson Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of James Hovland Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 4:12 PM Subject: FW: AGAINST Removal of the Falls at 54th Street Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 1952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Paul Hanson [mailto:paulh@woodstoneinc.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:19 PM To: James Hovland Subject: AGAINST Removal of the Falls at 54th Street Hello, Mayor Hovland: I would like you to know that my wife and I are AGAINST the removal of the waterfall at 54th Street. We often canoe the creek and the falls are always exciting. I am all for the other improvements at Arden Park, but the falls need to stay. Thank you for your service to the City of Edina! Paul and Sue Hanson 4520 Garrison Lane Edina, MN 55424 Cell Phone: (612) 325-8677 Phone: (952) 920-7930 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 8:42 AM Subject: FW: Minnehaha Creek Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.00v I EdinaMN.gov From: Carolynn Kimmes [mailto:cmkimmes@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 8:10 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Minnehaha Creek Hello I am an Edina resident, and just read the article in the StarTribune regarding Minnehaha creek in Arden Park. I am a strong supporter of the changes proposed in the park. Minnehaha creek is not an "urban waterway", it is a creek that existed long before the "urban" arrived, and I am very happy that there are plans to re-meander the creek. Please do not let the loud voices of a few override the realization that when we change waterways instead of living around them in their natural state, we often realize later that we create more problems than we "fix". I wholeheartedly support the proposal between the city and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed district to renovate the creek in Arden Park. Please keep this in mind while you are listening to the small minority of Edina residents who are opposed to this plan, and who would put their personal use of a small area of the creek over the health of the waterway, which will be here long after we are all gone. Thank you, Carolynn Kimmes 6730 Vernon Ave #116 Edina, 55436 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:07 AM Subject: FW: Save the 54th St waterfall Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoPEdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Alissa Collins [rnailto:ahcollins@me.com] Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 3:18 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the 54th St waterfall Please do not remove be the waterfall at 54th St. The fishing hole is a neighborhood and city of Edina gem. In fact, my husband just walked down there right now with my 5 yr old to go fishing. This has become a favorite activity for our son and I'd hate to see it be taken away. Alissa Collins 5501 Brookview Ave 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:20 AM Subject: FW: Save the waterfall Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: ELIZABETH A MADSON [mailto:fourmadsons@me.com] Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 8:13 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the waterfall Please listen to the citizens, save the falls! Betsy Madson There's a great big beautiful tomorrow ... Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:25 AM Subject: FW: Waterfall Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Biz Mcshane [mailto:bizmcshane@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 12:59 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Waterfall To City Council Members, I am writing to express my concern over the proposed changes to Arden park including altering the creek flow. I feel a thorough study should be done to understand the environmental impact. Nature has adjusted to the current creek flow and disrupting it again may do more harm than good. Please request a detailed study from the watershed district. This decision should not be take lightly. Biz Sent from my iPhone 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:30 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Waterfall Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist );,-! 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Mary Ballintine [nnailto:ballintnn(agmail.conn] Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 4:46 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Waterfall We write in support of keeping the lovely waterfall in Arden Park. We have resided in Edina for 36 years and recognize with each passing year what a treasure our community is. Let us maintain some of the beautiful, natural features that make our city the "enclave" that drew us and our felliw residents here in the first place. Robert and Mary Ballintine 4620 West 56th Street Edina MN 55424 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:33 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park-waterfall Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ).,) 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.qov I EdinaMN.gov From: mamasny13@aol.com [mailto:nnamasny13@aol.com] Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2017 5:53 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park-waterfall Dear City Council members and Mayor Hovland, I just want to voice my concern about the possible removal of the waterfall at Arden Park. This waterfall and park are a very important part of our city. They are used by residents and non-residents all of the time! If the Watershed council wanted to get rid of it, why did they wait until after all of improvements happened last year! Really poor planning on their part. It seems to me that many of the facts that they are using are not true. I would like to see you save the waterfall for current as well as future residents! Cathy Snyder Resident-5501 Wooddale Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 9:37 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park/ May 30,2017 Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoPEdinaMN.gov 1 EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Jane Fuegner [mailto:ianefuegner@vahoo.com] Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 4:13 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park/ May 30,2017 Dear Council Members, PLEASE, keep Arden Park rustic, without a lot of fixing that many of us neither need nor want.True, there are some things in the proposal that would enhance the existing space, but our serene park is fine without the the addition of the proposed new and extended trails and ALL of the creek "improvements." As the saying goes,"Less is more," especially for our Edina neighborhood, which we can enjoy without the 4 million dollar price tag. Yours truly, Jane Fuegner (Kellogg resident since 1971) 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:29 AM Subject: FW: Strongly support the Arden Park Restoration project Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: DIANE LINDGREN [nnailto:dianelindgren@me.corn] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 12:44 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Strongly support the Arden Park Restoration project Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, and Stewart, I laud Edina's partnering with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District on the Arden Park Project. When it's completed it will be a real jewel for Edina. Edina has undertaken so many wonderful forward looking park projects. Of course Centennial Lakes and my own neighborhood's Pamela Park come quickly to mind. I hope you'll support this project so that Arden Park will be another one we can all be proud of. Sincerely, Diane Lindgren Sent from my iPad Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:31 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Project-- YES!!! Good morning, This message has been forwarded to Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Janey Westin [mailto:ianevwestin@usa.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 1:42 AM To: Edina Mail; Mary Brindle (Comcast); Bob Stewart; Robert Stewart; Kevin Staunton; Kevin Staunton; Mike Fischer Subject: Arden Park Project-- YES!!! Hello Edina City Council Members and Mayor Hovland. I am writing to voice my wholehearted SUPPORT of proposed changes to Arden Park and its portion of Minnehaha Creek, working with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). I have seen other portions of Minnehaha Creek upstream from Edina, before and after MCWD guided improvements-- by Minnetonka City Hall, Minnetonka Mills/Burwell House Park, by Blake Road in St. Louis Park, and by Methodist Hospital. All were well planned and executed, using good scientific reasoning, and help the creek to be cleaner with better wildlife habitat. I grew up around Minnetonka Mills, kayaking down Minnehaha Creek every year-- sometimes all the way from Grays Bay to Minnehaha Falls. I know what it was like before. The MCWD is doing excellent work to improve the creek and surrounding areas for everyone. Arden Park's proposed new looping pathways, footbridge and observation area will draw regular walkers, runners, strollers and rollers of all ages and mobilities. More meandering of the creek will be better fish habitat for better fishing along a greater length of creek. Please do a little 'research' and take a drive out to Minnetonka Mills/Burwell House Park, about half a mile east of 494 on the north side of Minnetonka Blvd. Walk the newer done boardwalk paths, check out the fantastic fieldstone walls, the big boulders giving access to the creek, sit on a bench to view the creek and watch the kayakers, admire the artist done wrought iron archway, look at the beautiful plantings, and then walk another block east and have a treat at the local Dairy Queen. This park was a joint City of Minnetonka/MCWD project. It is beautiful. Edina can do all of this too. Okay... well, not the Dairy Queen a block away, but Arden Park can be even better than what it is now-- a treasured gem for the whole community. Very Sincerely in Support, Janey Westin, Edina resident since 1980 6136 Brookview Ave. (4, 83q-3191 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 9:25 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Melissa Seeley [mailto:msee10@me.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 8:52 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Hello, I am writing in strong opposition to the proposed plan at Arden Park. This park was one of the reasons we chose the home we did. My children have played there, my dog loves to walk there and it is a beautiful oasis in the middle of our neighborhood. Our neighborhood endured an extraordinarily long road construction project not long ago. I cannot imagine the turmoil this project would cause in this otherwise quiet, peaceful neighborhood. Construction would be the first problem. The increased traffic flow would be the second. This neighborhood is not equipped to handle parking for all the assumed visitors to this park. There are others places within the city that meet the need for residents to take advantage of the outdoors. While I certainly see the need for some improvements, such as the warming house, the project as proposed is overkill. The loss of the falls, while a major concern, pales in comparison to all the other losses we in the neighborhood would incur. Please take the very real concerns of Edina residents into consideration as you make your decision. Thank you, Melissa Seeley 5136 Indianola Avenue 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 1:14 PM Subject: FW: ARDEN PARK WATERFALL Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoaEdinaMN.00v I EdinaMN.gov From: Bruce Blumenthal [mailto:bblumenthal19410gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:29 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: ARDEN PARK WATERFALL Dear Mayor Hovland, I am not a resident of Edina (though six of my family are), but I am a user of the waterway below that waterfall. I do not think anyone backing the proposed removal of the falls/rapids, and other changes, is evil or stupid. There is no question in my mind that they are good people, who are proposing what they feel is for the best. Along with numerous others, I respectfully disagree with the proposal, and would like to tell you my two objections. First objection is on a more emotional level. Specifically, the incredible resource that will be lost to hundreds, if not more, folks from Edina and beyond. Do not know if you, or anyone else in authority, attended the rally there last night. If you did, you heard residents, nonresidents, kids, young adults and old folks like me, speak about how much they love that tiny slice of paradise. We heard from people, who fish, tube, kayak, canoe, swim, play, walk and sit and admire. As an avid fisherman, I undertook an adventure two years ago, and fished the entire creek. Started at Lake Minnetonka, and fished twenty-two different spots, before finishing at the Mississippi River. No place along the route, nor in most of the places I been privileged to fish across this country, offer the serenity, and variety of use that this one does. It would be a shame to move it. We, adults, can find other places to fish and recreate, and maybe most of the kids can to. The questions that should be asked: "Is this a good use of Edina's resources?" Have those, who have proposed this plan actually visited the area, and spent time there? Have they spoken to the folks using the area? Has there been a fair, and reasonable outreach to the community? The, answers to virtually all of those, based upon those to whom I have spoken, and those at the rally last night, is an overwhelming NO. And that greatly saddens me. Second objection: Let's remove, Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer from the equation, as one speaker did last night, and focus on the plan. There is no question that it will result in a massive loss of, mostly, old growth, trees. That will result in the loss of habitat for birds, such as owls and eagles. To be told that someone(s) have actually said this will be better for the fish, has very little knowledge of fish and their habitat. Based upon what was said last night, and the plans that I have been able to view on-line, there appear to be serious flaws in the cost estimates. Specifically, MPCA, Corps of Engineers, and OSHA regulations seem highly unlikely to be properly met with the $4,000,000.00 apparently allocated for this project. I am not an engineer, nor a contractor, but have been involved in enough building projects, and studied water flows for rivers and creeks long enough to know that some of the statements are either highly speculative, and/or naive. In fairness to your tax-paying citizens, believe this item should be tabled until this proposal can be studied by "experts" in this field, as well as organizations like The Audubon Society, Isaac Walton League, The Sierra Club, DNR and any other relevant folks. I join with many of your residents, and others in believing that the cost of the plan in dollars, environmental damage, and human enjoyment, far exceed and perceived value. Thank you very much for your consideration. Bruce Blumenthal 3820 Grand Way #402 St. Louis Park, Mn 55416** (Just a few blocks from Edina) 952-913-7592 2 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 3:34 PM Subject: FW: Arden Park renovation Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 1 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoAEdinaMN.qov I EdinaMN.gov From: betty workinger [mailto:bettyworkinger@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 3:22 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park renovation Jim, please say no to this absurd waste of money. We like the creek just as it is. Wild and wonderful and a treasure to have in our city. Betty and Geof Workinger Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 9:21 AM Subject: FW: ARDEN PARK WATERFALL Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov l EdinaMN.gov From: Bruce Blumenthal [mailto:bblumenthal1941@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 5:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Re: ARDEN PARK WATERFALL Thank you for your prompt, and nice, reply. Thought you all deserved to know what occurred when I came home today, and discussed this with my spouse of 52 years. We are likely going to move from here when our lease is up. Monday, a couple from this building told us they had signed a lease for the new apartments on York, and asked us to join them there. The Southdale area moved to the top of our list. That was yesterday. Today, Karen said to me; "If this destruction passes the city council, I do not want to live in Edina !! Both of us agree, that it is not that we will be on the losing side, but that the process was so disrespectful and unfair, that we could not in good faith, live in Edina. In addition, we agreed to not stop there. We have contacted friends and relatives, with whom we spend a considerable of time shopping, eating and seeing movies...much of that in Edina. We have advised them that if this passes, we will no longer spend any money in Edina. If just a dozen families, who were at that rally react the same way, the dollar cost to city's businesses will not be insignificant. Again, I want to emphasize, that this has nothing to do with not getting our way. It is based upon the lack of fair procedure, the misinformation supplied by other entities, and the apparent lack of fiduciary responsibility from the council, and park board. Respectfully, Bruce and Karen Blumenthal On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Edina Mail <mail@edinamn.gov> wrote: Dear Bruce, 1 Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. I have forwarded your message to the Mayor and Council members and the Parks & Recreation Director, Ann Kattreh. If I can be of additional assistance to you please contact me. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.qov I EdinaMN.gov From: Bruce Blumenthal [mailto:bblumenthal1941@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 11:29 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: ARDEN PARK WATERFALL Dear Mayor Hovland, I am not a resident of Edina (though six of my family are), but I am a user of the waterway below that waterfall. I do not think anyone backing the proposed removal of the falls/rapids, and other changes, is evil or stupid. There is no question in my mind that they are good people, who are proposing what they feel is for the best. Along with numerous others, I respectfully disagree with the proposal, and would like to tell you my two objections. 2 First objection is on a more emotional level. Specifically, the incredible resource that will be lost to hundreds, if not more, folks from Edina and beyond. Do not know if you, or anyone else in authority, attended the rally there last night. If you did, you heard residents, nonresidents, kids, young adults and old folks like me, speak about how much they love that tiny slice of paradise. We heard from people, who fish, tube, kayak, canoe, swim, play, walk and sit and admire. As an avid fisherman, I undertook an adventure two years ago, and fished the entire creek. Started at Lake Minnetonka, and fished twenty-two different spots, before finishing at the Mississippi River. No place along the route, nor in most of the places I been privileged to fish across this country, offer the serenity, and variety of use that this one does. It would be a shame to move it. We, adults, can find other places to fish and recreate, and maybe most of the kids can to. The questions that should be asked: "Is this a good use of Edina's resources?" Have those, who have proposed this plan actually visited the area, and spent time there? Have they spoken to the folks using the area? Has there been a fair, and reasonable outreach to the community? The, answers to virtually all of those, based upon those to whom I have spoken, and those at the rally last night, is an overwhelming NO. And that greatly saddens me. Second objection: Let's remove, Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer from the equation, as one speaker did last night, and focus on the plan. There is no question that it will result in a massive loss of, mostly, old growth, trees. That will result in the loss of habitat for birds, such as owls and eagles. To be told that someone(s) have actually said this will be better for the fish, has very little knowledge of fish and their habitat. Based upon what was said last night, and the plans that I have been able to view on-line, there appear to be serious flaws in the cost estimates. Specifically, MPCA, Corps of Engineers, and OSHA regulations seem highly unlikely to be properly met with the $4,000,000.00 apparently allocated for this project. I am not an engineer, nor a contractor, but have been involved in enough building projects, and studied water flows for rivers and creeks long enough to know that some of the statements are either highly speculative, and/or naive. In fairness to your tax-paying citizens, believe this item should be tabled until this proposal can be studied by "experts" in this field, as well as organizations like The Audubon Society, Isaac Walton League, The Sierra Club, DNR and any other relevant folks. I join with many of your residents, and others in believing that the cost of the plan in dollars, environmental damage, and human enjoyment, far exceed and perceived value. Thank you very much for your consideration. Bruce Blumenthal 3820 Grand Way #402 St. Louis Park, Mn 55416** (Just a few blocks from Edina) 3 952-913-7592 4 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 9:43 AM Subject: FW: Waterfall Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno(EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Nick L [mailto:nick878450gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 12:02 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Waterfall Hello, My name is Nick Lugo and I am emailing you concerning the West 54th Street waterfall. As you know the watershed district wants to remove the dam therefore destroying the fish hole that draws many fisherman to the site everyday. The West 54th Street Waterfall has been there since the 1930's, why does it need change. If you want to restore a place, restore Lake Cornelia, because it is the garbage dump of Edina. Please do not vote to try and fix something that does not need change, me and my friends are only some of the many fisherman who catch large fish in the creek every time we are there and we do not want that to end. Please read and consider this letter, help us fight the destruction of the waterfall. Thank you Nick Lugo - Eagle Scout and Junior from Edina High School 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 2:56 PM Subject: FW: Arden Park Good afternoon, Tis message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Tom Jones [mailto:torn@renex.us] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 2:50 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park To Whom It May Concern, I am a resident, and for the past 30 years have faced the west ridge of the park, and have lived within blocks of the park since 1965. I am opposed to the "restoration" plan! During my tenure near the park, I have played, fished tubed, coached over a dozen different years, and have shared the same activities with my children. I have 38 years in real estate as a broker and agent, and during that time have been involved as a partner or consultant to numerous developments, owned construction and architectural firms, and have had numerous projects far larger in both terms of size/scope and financial investment than the Arden Park project. I have also engaged in construction projects next to the west ridge, witnessed and studied the soils and topography ( and have the experience and expertise to understand the impactful elements related therein). I have also been present for the "100 year storm" ( twice in 10 years), the record high water of 2014, and at least 5 occasions where the park has flooded far in excess of the height of the dam/falls. I have also noted ( available via photo images contained in the Hennepin County interactive map site), whereby numerous years from 1999-2011, document the creek having changed course numerous times ( a situation, due to soil types, and permanent flood plain ( not rectified by a control change at 54th), will continue to happen, (as illustrated by numerous instances of documented water level and flow rates, predominantly influenced by weather and the Gray's Bay Dam) and guarantee that many of the new paths will be submerged as a result. In the case of the 2 "100 year" events, will likely destroy many proposed improvements. So needless to say, there is not only no evidence that the "meander" flow, and access will change and improve, there is significant data that suggests that vegetation and tree removal will more than likely destabilize soils, including the sandy west ridge, and exacerbate flooding and shore erosion. These conditions, plus the fact of decreased aeration, and added material to the water, as well as likely elevated water temperatures at the park, are all consistent with poor fish health have also acted as a fishing guide in the 2nd largest body of water in the state, other bodies, and have well above average knowledge of fish habitat and health). The proposal fails to substantiate this claim, beyond just making it. What is perhaps the largest ( likely to be the most expensive and damaging) part of the proposal, that is most disturbing, is the "deflection" of questions and concerns for the quantity, size, elevation, and subsequent necessity for extensive land retention, where the paths along the west sandy ridge are proposed. The plan ( as an illustration...cartoon) is 1 shown inserted into actual aerial photos, however, showing green space and tree cover inaccurately. Between 53rd street and Oaklawn, running along Brookview, is a section where the oldest, largest oaks and tallest elevation trees are on the path ( many more north of the "fork" in the path and accessing observation platforms, those paths, decks and stairs, not only remove 100s of trees, but also occur in a location where the grades exceed 45%, and the elevation in a matter of 10' laterally, changes by 6-25'. Uniform building codes require fencing or railings for retention walls exceeding 30", step back requirements for heights of more than 6'. Additionally OSHA requires stable, level, work spaces for scaffolding and ladders, but especially for equipment, and equipment access. The requirements ( one simple need look at the OSHA regulations, and Uniform building codes concerning retaining walls, the topographic maps ( same interactive site), or physically walk the site with the proposal and Hennepin Cty. topo maps in hand to see that the engineering demands for the west ridge are daunting. The resulting cost, soil destabilizing, erosion risk, wildlife habitat there are 3 species of nesting raptors and 2 owl species, all on watch, of concern, or critical lists of the DNR), and visual impact is devastating! This is also "toothpaste that can't be put back in the tube". The representations are not supported by fact, science, history, or an philosophies concerning habitat and wildlife preservation. The amount of work needed is inaccurate and disingenuous in its portrayal verbally and in the plan "image". The innuendo regarding the Park as being part of the "impaired waters", is just that, innuendo at best, deception at worst, as the portion of the creek at the park is not currently included as an impaired water, and all but 1 of the several dozen waters one finds on the actual report, flow into Lk. Minnetonka ( primarily from the north and west, and in areas of predominantly private sewer and over 10000 head livestock). Not applicable to Arden Park, other than these water eventually flow to here. This proposal is objected to by close to 80% of the residents, has been presented as a proposal absent compromise, and that with the implication that extensive deferred maintenance and neglect ( rundown warming house, sign with swastikas etc.), will not be addressed absent a partnership with the watershed. This in spite of the Park board having more than adequate monies to address, improvements, maintenance and repair, and some additional erosion control and accessibility. Thank you for your diligent and timely attention to this matter. Tom Jones Sent from my iPhone 2 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 4:17 PM Subject: FW: I support! fwd: Arden Park plan to be presented to Council June 20 Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Jim Korslund [mailto:jrkorslund@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 3:59 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: I support! fwd: Arden Park plan to be presented to Council June 20 Thanks to City Staff for giving us a chance for input! I live relatively close to the creek and the park, and am an active parishioner at St. Stephen's Church, so the health of the creek and the watershed are important to me. I support the proposed plan, and the removal of the dam. I like that your team has considered the health of the creek & the surrounding area, and has reviewed the science of the overall situation. I suppose that plan might impact the small area of the fishing hole BELOW the dam, but this impact is far outweighed, in my mind, by the overall improvement to the creek. Please take this email as full support for moving forward; I'd be pleased if both the City and the MCWD can proceed as discussed. Again, many thanks! -- Jim Korslund 4606 Casco Avenue Edina, MN 55424 m) 320 260 8911 jrkorslund@gmail.com Forwarded message From: Nextdoor Country Club <reply@rs.email.nextdoor.com> Date: Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:57 AM Subject: Arden Park plan to be presented to Council June 20 To: jim.korslund@yahoo.com O 1 City Staff, City of Edina AGENCY The Arden Park Concept Plan will be presented to City Council at its June 20 meeting. The City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District are working together to restore the creek, improve fish and wildlife habitat, and add features to the park to enhance the enjoyment of nature. The June 20 presentation format doesn't include public testimony; people are encouraged to submit written comments to EdinaMail@edinamn.gov. To learn more, visit EdinaMN.gov/ardenparkconceptplan. Jun 1 in General to 7 neighborhoods in City of Edina Thank Private message You can also reply to this email or use Nextdoor for iPhone or Android This message is intended for jim.korslund@yahoo.com. Not interested in hearing from the City of Edina? Adjust your email settings Nextdoor. 875 Stevenson Street, Suite 700, San Francisco, CA 94103 2 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 10:10 AM Subject: FW: Contact Us form submission Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoAEdinaMN.qov I EdinaMN.gov From: michelle(aredpillchicago.com [mailto:michelle(aredpillchicago.com] Sent: Friday, June 02, 2017 9:29 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Contact Us form submission Name: Michelle Meek Organization: Resident Website: Address_l : 5228 Kellogg Ave Address_2: City: Edina State: MN Zip_Code: 55424 Email: michelle@redpillchicago.com Phone: michelle@redpillchicago.com Referrer: other Message: Good morning, I'd like to voice my opposition to the $4mm Arden park restoration project - specifically, the demolition of the Minnehaha Creek waterfall. I am all for updating the park (e.g., fields, warming house), but $4mm seems an awful lot to spend on the already beautiful creek area. I especially want the falls to remain as is. As a resident who goes there regularly with my sons and dog, it would be devastating to lose such an amazing natural area. Please keep the falls as they are and consider taking a less expansive approach to the restoration of Arden Park. Sincerely, Michelle Meek Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 4:20 PM Subject: FW: Save The Waterfall Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. /(61 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: tgholmes@juno.com [mailto:tgholmes@juno.com] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 4:07 PM To: Edina Mail Cc: tgholmes@juno.com Subject: Save The Waterfall To the Mayor of Edina and the Edina City Council: I recently returned home from a long trip to discover the City of Edina wants to destroy the Arden Park Waterfalls. This is very distressing to me. I have lived across from the falls since it was built in the early sixties to replace the dam under the 54th street bridge. When the neighborhood study about the new bridge was done a few years ago, there was overwhelming support to NOT change the falls or the waterflow. For the city to ignore these findings is astonishing to me. The falls have provided a unique environment I have not seen anywhere else in any of my travels. The falls provide kayaking, rafting, canoeing and tubing excitement for many without being dangerous. The fishing opportunities are legendary to those who know, with bass, northern, muskie etc reported to have been taken here. The night heron can be found here frequently looking for the same fish. Other birds, including egrets, great blue heron and bald eagles, have also been seen fishing here. I have watched deer, coyote, beaver, bald eagles, red pileated woodpeckers, eastern screech owl, muskrat, fox, ducks, and geese through the years. Obviously these wild animals all live and thrive here with the park as it is. The northern part of the park provides dirt paths and trails used by many while walking their dogs, riding bicycles, or simply enjoying a deep woods experience without a developed walking path. All this is in the middle of our city. With the new proposed bridge, paths and observation deck, many of these trees will be cut down, I'm told, because of OSHA regulations for the operation of the heavy equipment necessary for the projects. So the north part of the park will also be destroyed. What's to be gained by all this? Edina will get matching funds, 2 million for 2 million, making this a "buy one get one free" type of bargain. Who can resist that? But all 4 million dollars are still our tax dollars. A new warming house and raised paths to fix flooding, and concrete repair to the dam could surely be done for less than 2 million. In short, this is a bad proposal that a majority of homeowners near the park do not want. I urge you to vote NO on the proposal. Sincerely, Todd Holmes Arden Park Resident for 50+ years 2 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:08 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Diane Rice [mailtojclarice@msn.com] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 10:43 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Unfortunately we will not be able to be at the meeting on the 20th to hear the presentation and hear you discuss it. And apparently audience discussion will not be allowed. So our feelings about the project are the following. 1. Please redo, rebuild the warming house. That's a necessity that is used by many and is in need of improvement. This is an important part of Arden Park. 2. More playground equipment, picnic tables and benches around the playground would be wonderful. More landscaping here too.. This area gets so much use. 3. The "skating rink" field. Please just fill in the low spots so the area isn't mushy in the spring. Reseed, and it will be good for soccer, baseball... running and having fun. 4. I walk through this park daily. Honestly, the walk through the park and now around it are just fine. Please leave a little bit of nature. Really, we don't need a guided path everywhere! 5. And finally. If this latest water plan is s00000 important, can you please tell me why it wasn't done 2 years ago when the 54th St. bridge was being done!? That construction was a mess for the neighborhood and now the plan is to repeat it??? I'm not sure where the funds are coming from to do yet another beautification and wise project but we really think this is silly and abusive. The river does flow through it.... just please leave it alone. Please be considerate of the neighborhood and those who truly do use it. Thank you, Diane and Jim Rice Diane Rice Jdarice@ymsn.com 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:15 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Natural Resource Concept Plan Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.00v I EdinaMN.gov From: Jim Alt [rnailto:altjimOhotmail.conn] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 7:53 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Natural Resource Concept Plan I am writing in support of the Arden Park Natural Resource Concept Plan, which I understand is scheduled for a City Council vote on June 20. As a member of the neighborhood, I know that the park is long overdue for the kinds of improvements that are proposed, and especially for mitigation of the sogginess that pervades a good-sized portion of the park. Although opposition recently has materialized regarding removal of the dam under the 54th Street bridge, I'd note that the number of people who actually use the pool just south of the bridge is very small, as I know from frequent walks in the neighborhood and drives over the bridge. Thank you for your attention to this communication. Jim Alt 5617 Oaklawn Avenue Edina 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:30 AM Subject: FW: Removal of the Waterfall Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. (.; Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoEdinaMN.00v I EdinaMN.gov From: LINDA J PARELL [mailto:LJPJJP@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 9:15 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Removal of the Waterfall I am so perplexed as to why the Watershed District thinks that the removal of the dam will be beneficial to the current environment. I have never seen so many fishermen at this spot in the 10+ years I have lived on the creek. I did not attend the city council meeting(s) because I was not informed. I did watch the video where public comment regarding the removal was not allowed. My understandingding is that the creek is not sustainable in its current condition due to the amount of fish that presently exist and therefore by meandering the creek, the outside parts of the creek would become deeper and accomodate more fish is what I have read. I have no reason to doubt this, but there are plenty of fish in the creek. this is self evident by the number of predators of fish now very common on the creek and by the amount of fishermen I see there on a daily basis, weather permitting. The area on both sides of 54th is a treasure that has been enjoyed by generations. Since I feel strongly that this project has been poorly communicated thus far, I am not sure that my thoughts will be heard, but I would be remiss if I didn't attempt to send my objection to someone who has the authority to influence it. 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 10:45 AM Subject: FW: Save the Waterfall Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno(EdinaMN.qov I EdinaMN.gov From: Rob Gottsch [mailto:rogottsch@wlgore.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 10:36 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the Waterfall Please save the waterfall. This is a community icon that is hard to replicate in suburbia America. Many young children will learn one the Minnesota's true identities, fishing. Be mindful of the impact your decisions have both financially, and on the community. The watershed district needs to find away to work together with the citizens of Edina and meet their goals. Find a way to update Arden and keep the waterfall! Best Regards, Robert Gottsch This email may contain trade secrets or privileged, undisclosed or otherwise confidential information. If you have received this email in error, you are hereby notified that any review, copying or distribution of it is strictly prohibited. Please inform us immediately and destroy the original transmittal. Thank you for your cooperation. Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:58 PM Subject: FW: Save the Waterfall Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Gottsch, Katherine [JANUS] [mailto:KGottsc1(aits.jnj.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:56 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Save the Waterfall Dear Mayor and City Council of Edina, I'm writing as a concerned citizen. I have been reading about the potential watershed project that would affect the waterfall at the 54th St. bridge. My family, particularly my 10 year old son and his friends, are finding much joy in fishing in the creek at the waterfall. In an effort to raise a healthy and well-rounded family, we encourage outdoor play, love of nature and personal relationships. The creek and particulary the fishing hole at the 54th street bridge, afford our kids just this opportunity. What a great local spot! Although I understand that there's money in the budget both from the watershed and from Edina, my concerns are the unnecessary spending of both watershed and city money just because it's available. I wanted to express my family's lack of interest in any change to the waterfall. I imagine there are more pressing and immediate needs that could be addressed with those funds or perhaps just not spending money if there aren't. Thanks for your consideration. Kate Gottsch 1. Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 1:01 PM Subject: FW: Arden Park Attachments: IMG_0559.PNG; ATT00001.txt Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoPEdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Tom Jones [nnailto:tom@renex.us] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 12:57 PM To: jinn@iimgrotz.com; edinacreekside@yahoo.com; Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Tweeted today in response to city of Edina tweet. As you know, I/we have all the accurate maps, topos, grade percentage, quantity of trees and 1000s of feet of retention and access, safety work conditions per OSHA, Uniform Building Code, and physical examination of impacted west ridge areas ( inaccurate in proposal, preceding ignored or eliminated from research and preceding request for funding approval). At least one council member has stated " will go on watershed expert recommendations". This in spite of nearly unanimous neighborhood objections ( most living on or facing park not contacted for input, contrary to "pitch" for funding representation). What is the point of a council voting on major impactful issues, that are unwilling to look at the hard data, or listen to residents? Look at the "tweet" and its appurtenant links to the watershed document, and ask why the city is ignoring public outcry, the facts concerning immediate 6-30' elevation changes at the work site and construction access requirements, the retention, access roads, "struck by" and soil stabilization and level work spaces, grades exceeding 45% ( all addressed by OSHA and codes, and all applicable), the 100s of healthy native trees to be removed ( habitat and soil stabilization on a sand ridge), the non insurable components of working in a floodway together with liability risks probable therein, and the likely millions of dollars in retention, fencing, and falling safety requirements during and after construction and unmentioned in the proposal? The population needs to be aware of this position, who the responsible voting parties are, and the level of due diligence undertaken by these individuals ( or lack thereof). Please tweet additional comments and concerns, publish contact info for responsible parties, and email via contacts and ND, the several hundred people that have already signed a petition and the 80+% that have indicated they oppose the present plan ( noting the watershed has been adamant in their position that it is " an all or nothing" proposal, and the precedent facts do not support the claim by them of "extensive neighborhood input and support". Under laws concerning and affecting homeowners and real estate professionals in the state, people should be required to disclose in any potentially impacted property in the area ( up or down stream) "material facts". That defined as information pertinent to a dwelling or changes proposed or planned for an area, that affect the quiet enjoyment or value of the property. This clearly falls meets the threshold of mandatory disclosure. T 1 Thomas L. Jones islandinangle Replying to @EdinaMN Map ( and scale) don't match actual, 100s of trees, floodway disruption, OSHA laws, elevation issues ignored. Destruction with a "pitch" No! 6/6/17, 12:18 PM ill VIEW TWEET ACTIVITY 4N% ta.4, Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 4:19 PM Subject: FW: Arden Park attention city council and mayor and Commissioner Jan Callison, Chair of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. ;. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: stan davis [mailto:edinacreekside@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 2:51 PM To: Tom Jones; jim@jimgrotz.com; Edina Mail; janis.callison@hennepin.us; JWisker@minnehahacreek.org Subject: Re: Arden Park attention city council and mayor and Commissioner Jan Callison, Chair of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. to the city council and the mayor and Ms. Callison, Jay Wisker, Tom has stated some real concerns about this project from both the economic and the ecologic sides of this poorly thought out proposal. I would go so far as to say that whomever concocted this plan, and the primary drivers of it from the MCWD should be fired. I am starting an email campaign with this email to give the Chair of the Hennepin County Board some appreciation for the concerns of her constituents. Since she is ultimately responsible, along with the board, as to who sits on the board of MCWD, it makes since that she would be concerned. perhaps I'm wrong. Only 2 and a half years ago, Mike Osterholm, a well know infectious disease expert who travels the world to conferences and has had many meetings with various federal and local agencies, stated about the MCWD, I've never seen any organization in Minnesota in my 40 years with more dysfunction and lack of good governance." Star Tribune, 10/14/2014 At the time he was serving as one among a citizens advisory board. This would beg for more oversight at the time of the quote and for the last 2 and a half years, but i don't see it. That lack of oversight and the current bullying of the MCWD can only come down to one body's accountability...the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. This MCWD proposal has been disingenuous from the start and "disingenuous" has become my operative word for this whole process. I will give more information about this during my 3 minutes tonight at City Hall, if they have me. It won't be all of the information i have but will be damning of the MCWD and the Edina Park and Rec Boards with regards to poor communication in all facets and a "stink" factor that leads one to believe that this project was railroaded through at the behest of the MCWD. It appears this project is now an "all or none" proposition for the City of Edina. So, let me get this straight: 1 An entity has a vested interest in government official(s) following through with an entity's plan. The entity offers a government official(s) a large sum of money ($1.6 million) only if those officals act in the entity's interest. If not the offer of money is withdrawn. Or... The entity, now healthier from the official(s) accepting of the gift, finds itself in a more favorable position (through something as minimal as public perception or the ability to raise more funds). I'm no lawyer, but i do have a pretty good sense of right and wrong. This to me has at least the appearance of bribery. Maybe the Star Tribune would call it undue influence. Or perhaps "business as usual" in a system of government run by different government agencies' quid pro quos where neither government agency is accountable to its citizenry but to other government agencies. I would think the MCWD would have a great interest in improving the creek as it runs through Arden Park. They could just be more creative, and head to the drawing board without removing a beloved waterfall where people come together to relax and enjoy some of their favorite activities. What would it cost? I'm certain a lot less than $1.6 million. Below are the "guiding principles" as to be seen on the MCWD's website: Guiding Principles • Partnership — We seek to understand the goals of others so that we can meaningfully integrate our work to add broader value to the community. • Innovation — We are flexible and creative in our approach and strive for continuous improvement. • Excellence — We commit to work that achieves outstanding results and honors our partners. • Sound Science — We are a trusted source of scientific data and analyses that provide the foundation for wise decisions. • Service — We are responsive and accountable to our communities and careful stewards of public funds. The highlights are mine, the unenlisted guiding principles are the MCWDs. stan p.s. i wouldn't want to have to explain to a government oversite board why my project was an "all or none" in terms of helping the areas of human endeavor that i am charged with. that can lead to questions about agendas. Stanley Edgar Davis MD, FACOG 5509 Woodcrest Drive Edina, Minnesota 55424 Cell: 612 839-7322 (Please text if convenient.) 2 E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication, along with any documents, files or attachments, is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of any information contained in or attached to this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original communication and its attachments without reading, printing or saving in any manner. Thank you. From: Tom Jones <tomrenex.us> To: jimjimgrotz.com; edinacreeksideyahoo.com; EdinaMail@edinamn.gov Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 12:57 PM Subject: Arden Park Tweeted today in response to city of Edina tweet. As you know, I/we have all the accurate maps, topos, grade percentage, quantity of trees and 1000s of feet of retention and access, safety work conditions per OSHA, Uniform Building Code, and physical examination of impacted west ridge areas ( inaccurate in proposal, preceding ignored or eliminated from research and preceding request for funding approval). At least one council member has stated " will go on watershed expert recommendations". This in spite of nearly unanimous neighborhood objections ( most living on or facing park not contacted for input, contrary to "pitch" for funding representation). What is the point of a council voting on major impactful issues, that are unwilling to look at the hard data, or listen to residents? Look at the "tweet" and its appurtenant links to the watershed document, and ask why the city is ignoring public outcry, the facts concerning immediate 6-30' elevation changes at the work site and construction access requirements, the retention, access roads, "struck by" and soil stabilization and level work spaces, grades exceeding 45% ( all addressed by OSHA and codes, and all applicable), the 100s of healthy native trees to be removed ( habitat and soil stabilization on a sand ridge), the non insurable components of working in a floodway together with liability risks probable therein, and the likely millions of dollars in retention, fencing, and falling safety requirements during and after construction and unmentioned in the proposal? The population needs to be aware of this position, who the responsible voting parties are, and the level of due diligence undertaken by these individuals ( or lack thereof). Please tweet additional comments and concerns, publish contact info for responsible parties, and email via contacts and ND, the several hundred people that have already signed a petition and the 80+% that have indicated they oppose the present plan ( noting the watershed has been adamant in their position that it is " an all or nothing" proposal, and the precedent facts do not support the claim by them of "extensive neighborhood input and support". Under laws concerning and affecting homeowners and real estate professionals in the state, people should be required to disclose in any potentially impacted property in the area ( up or down stream) "material facts". That defined as information pertinent to a dwelling or changes proposed or planned for an area, that affect the quiet enjoyment or value of the property. This clearly falls meets the threshold of mandatory disclosure. T Sent from my iPhone 3 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 4:19 PM Subject: FW: Arden Park Restoration Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Jfisherl7 [mailtolisher17@conncast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 4:07 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Restoration Mayor Hovland: As a resident of 5232 Brookview Ave. for the past 32 years, I urge you reconsider this restoration plan as it has been presented. Across the street from me and along the creek, many trees, as I understand, will have to be cut down for the viewing areas and for the path. There is no need to cut down trees, and no need for a path. People have gotten along just fine without those for many years. If people want to "view the park", let them go down to the park to view it. On top of that, where would they park except probably in front of many of our driveways? I myself would much rather look at trees than the park-that's why the location of this house interested me in the first place. Plus, aren't we supposed to be for wildlife? Why disturb an area that's teeming with the views of nature. There's a bald eagle pair that visits the area regularly. I've seen fox, coyotes, raccoons, owls, and hawks. I can understand getting rid of the buckthorn, but please leave the trees and don't disturb the area with a path that is totally unnecessary. Thanks, Jim Fisher 5232 Brookview Ave. So. Sent from my iPad 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 8:30 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park attention city council and mayor and Commissioner Jan Callison, Chair of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov From: Tom Jones [mailto:tom@renex.us] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 8:59 PM To: stan davis Cc: jim@jimgrotz.com; Edina Mail; janis.callison@hennepin.us; JWisker@minnehahacreek.org Subject: Re: Arden Park attention city council and mayor and Commissioner Jan Callison, Chair of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. Amen. To elaborate, I have contacted several contractors with experience and expertise regarding code and OSHA concerns on the West Bank, and the floodway. The consensus thus far, is that the proposal is at least 2 million under actual likely cost, presents significant liability issues, and have had parties in the legal community suggest that the gross negligence may subject not only the governing bodies and agencies to liability, but in the case of no evidence of reasonable care and due diligence, subject the negligent individuals to liability, to include monetary, punitive, and criminal damages. I have personally participated in over a dozen developments, as a contractor, partner, architectural firm owner, feasibility consultant, and marketing consultant, and for approaching 40 years. I have never seen anything lacking accountability to this degree. There are dozens, if not hundreds of people prepared to make sure appropriate light is shed on this, and the responsibility of the concerned parties at the city and the watershed. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 6, 2017, at 2:51 PM, stan davis <edinacreekside@yahoo.com> wrote: to the city council and the mayor and Ms. Callison, Jay Wisker, Tom has stated some real concerns about this project from both the economic and the ecologic sides of this poorly thought out proposal. I would go so far as to say that whomever concocted this plan, and the primary drivers of it from the MCWD should be fired. I am starting an email campaign with this email to give the Chair of the Hennepin County Board some appreciation for the concerns of her constituents. Since she is ultimately responsible, along with the board, as to who sits on the board of MCWD, it makes since that she would be concerned. perhaps I'm wrong. Only 2 and a half years ago, Mike Osterholm, a well know infectious disease expert who travels the world to conferences and has had many meetings with various federal and local agencies, stated about the MCWD, I've never seen any organization in Minnesota in my 40 years with more dysfunction and lack of good governance." Star Tribune, 10/14/2014 At the time he was serving as one among a citizens advisory board. This would beg for more oversight at the time of the quote and for the last 2 and a half years, but i don't see it. That lack of oversight and the current bullying of the MCWD can only come down to one body's accountability...the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. This MCWD proposal has been disingenuous from the start and "disingenuous" has become my operative word for this whole process. I will give more information about this during my 3 minutes tonight at City Hall, if they have me. It won't be all of the information i have but will be damning of the MCWD and the Edina Park and Rec Boards with regards to poor communication in all facets and a "stink" factor that leads one to believe that this project was railroaded through at the behest of the MCWD. It appears this project is now an "all or none" proposition for the City of Edina. So, let me get this straight: An entity has a vested interest in government official(s) following through with an entity's plan. The entity offers a government official(s) a large sum of money ($1.6 million) only if those officals act in the entity's interest. If not the offer of money is withdrawn. or... The entity, now healthier from the official(s) accepting of the gift, finds itself in a more favorable position (through something as minimal as public perception or the ability to raise more funds). I'm no lawyer, but i do have a pretty good sense of right and wrong. This to me has at least the appearance of bribery. Maybe the Star Tribune would call it undue influence. Or perhaps "business as usual" in a system of government run by different government agencies' quid pro quos where neither government agency is accountable to its citizenry but to other government agencies. I would think the MCWD would have a great interest in improving the creek as it runs through Arden Park. They could just be more creative, and head to the drawing board without removing a beloved waterfall where people come together to relax and enjoy some of their favorite activities. What would it cost? I'm certain a lot less than $1.6 million. Below are the "guiding principles" as to be seen on the MCWD's website: Guiding Principles 2 • Partnership — We seek to understand the goals of others so that we can meaningfully integrate our work to add broader value to the community. • Innovation — We are flexible and creative in our approach and strive for continuous improvement. • Excellence — We commit to work that achieves outstanding results and honors our partners. • Sound Science — We are a trusted source of scientific data and analyses that provide the foundation for wise decisions. • Service — We are responsive and accountable to our communities and careful stewards of public funds. The highlights are mine, the unenlisted guiding principles are the MCWDs. stan p.s. i wouldn't want to have to explain to a government oversite board why my project was an "all or none" in terms of helping the areas of human endeavor that i am charged with. that can lead to questions about agendas. Stanley Edgar Davis MD, FACOG 5509 Woodcrest Drive Edina, Minnesota 55424 Cell: 612 839-7322 (Please text if convenient.) E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication, along with any documents, files or attachments, is intended only for the use of the addressee(s) and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of any information contained in or attached to this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original communication and its attachments without reading, printing or saving in any manner. Thank you. From: Tom Jones <tom@renex.us> To: jimjimgrotz.com; edinacreeksideyahoo.com; EdinaMailedinamn.gov Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 12:57 PM Subject: Arden Park Tweeted today in response to city of Edina tweet. As you know, I/we have all the accurate maps, topos, grade percentage, quantity of trees and 1000s of feet of retention and access, safety work conditions per OSHA, Uniform Building Code, and physical examination of impacted west ridge areas ( inaccurate in proposal, preceding ignored or eliminated from research and preceding request for funding approval). At least one council member has stated " will go on watershed expert recommendations". This in spite of nearly unanimous neighborhood objections ( most living on or facing park not contacted for input, contrary to "pitch" for funding representation). What is the point of a council voting on major impactful issues, that are unwilling to look at the hard data, or listen to residents? 3 Look at the "tweet" and its appurtenant links to the watershed document, and ask why the city is ignoring public outcry, the facts concerning immediate 6-30' elevation changes at the work site and construction access requirements, the retention, access roads, "struck by" and soil stabilization and level work spaces, grades exceeding 45% ( all addressed by OSHA and codes, and all applicable), the 100s of healthy native trees to be removed ( habitat and soil stabilization on a sand ridge), the non insurable components of working in a floodway together with liability risks probable therein, and the likely millions of dollars in retention, fencing, and falling safety requirements during and after construction and unmentioned in the proposal? The population needs to be aware of this position, who the responsible voting parties are, and the level of due diligence undertaken by these individuals ( or lack thereof). Please tweet additional comments and concerns, publish contact info for responsible parties, and email via contacts and ND, the several hundred people that have already signed a petition and the 80+% that have indicated they oppose the present plan ( noting the watershed has been adamant in their position that it is " an all or nothing" proposal, and the precedent facts do not support the claim by them of "extensive neighborhood input and support". Under laws concerning and affecting homeowners and real estate professionals in the state, people should be required to disclose in any potentially impacted property in the area ( up or down stream) "material facts". That defined as information pertinent to a dwelling or changes proposed or planned for an area, that affect the quiet enjoyment or value of the property. This clearly falls meets the threshold of mandatory disclosure. T Sent from my iPhone 4 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 9:02 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoPEdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Elizabeth McGarry [mailto:eimcgarry@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 12:55 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park I have learned recently that many mature trees are to be cut down to accommodate the restructuring of the creek in Arden Park, including the beautiful, graceful willows near the bridge. I object! Elizabeth McGarry Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 9:06 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Jen Augustson [mailto:Ien.augustson@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 3:45 PM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Hello, I am a resident in the Arden Park neighborhood. I am impressed with the comprehensive plan for the park that will make it more usable; however, almost every neighbor I talk with is shocked that the plan doesn't include an update to the playground. Arden Park's playground is outdated compared to other parks in the city. In addition, the gravel surface is a terrible concept for playgrounds. I know we had them when we were growing up, but between thrown rocks and hidden objects, it does not promote safety. My neighbors are saying, "they're going to spend millions moving the creek, but not update the part of the park that gets the most frequent use??!" I'm wondering if the Council could ask the park planners: - What would need to be delayed or dropped from the current plan to include the replacement of the current playground with new equipment and a new surface? - What would need to be delayed or dropped from the current plan to replace at least the surface of the playground? Thank you! Jen Augustson 5000 Arden Ave 1 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 9:18 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Attachments: IMG_0563.PNG; ATT00001.txt; IMG_0564.PNG; ATT00002.txt; IMG_0565.PNG; ATT00003.txt Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members , Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Tom Jones [mailto:tom@renex.us] Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 10:17 PM To: iim@jimgrotz.com; edinacreekside@yahoo.com; Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park The MCWS board has been presented and supplied copious documentation concerning FEMA violations present in proposed, a non eminent domain "taking" as described by FEMA in documents concerning working in or placing encroachments in an A floodway, topography maps from Hennepin County, depicting the predominantly 45+% grade on the West Bank of the Park, and laws concerning necessary retention, creation of lesser grade access roads, level stable work surfaces ( all documented by numerous OSHA, and Uniform Code laws), as well as the minimum of 5 listed critical species on the DNR list, and the necessity of mature tree root structures to stabilize a predominantly sand hill. There response is to add the additional photos of high and low water flow at 54th St. ( both photos are pre bridge improvement, and both drought years). A clear and intentional misrepresentation of the facts. To persist with the misleading statement that "this is to improve the water quality, whereas Minnehaha Creek is included as an impaired water, and whereas it is factual that parts of the creek are on the DNR impaired waters report, Arden Park is not. This is just heinous and gross misrepresentation. The actual photos of the park ( absent the proposal overlay) show the actual location of the trees and road, and Park boundary ( note that topo maps have already been supplied and further evidence the exact location of the paths, observation decks and stairs, note as well the photos and proposal are both on a 50' scale ( to help visualize the road is 35'), evidencing to an even greater extent that the "improvements" are proposed in areas of 6-28' elevation changes. The overlay shows a fictional depiction of the trees, and expands to covering the right of way ( Brookview/Oaklawn confluence was not built consistent with plans, survey, and has caused necessity for variances for homeowners in recent years). Even were one to "assume" the drawings are "hypothetical", why would they be represented as otherwise, why would this even be considered for a funding vote absent the overwhelming lack of due diligence and misrepresentation? This and the other supporting documents need to be widely distributed, so as not to be considers "conjecture" by a "layman". They ( the people) need to know experienced, licensed by the Department of Commerce ( in various disciplines), licensed general contractors and contractors, specializing in the construction of walls, for both the private 1 and public sectors, have been consulted and agree with all the findings considered by FRMA, OSHA, and Code. ( they were also of the opinion that project bid, will likely be exceeded on just the West side alone). Just this Saturday alone, dozens of canoe, kayak, tubers, and people fishing at 54th were present, many more walking, ( many with pets) biking, and playing on the West side. I doubt any 18 acres in Edina had more activity. The representation that these activities have declined or have diminished appeal is a "bald faced lie". Reprehensible behavior by the MCWS, just as bad the silence or support of this by the Mayor, Council, and Park Park Board. They need to listen to the overwhelming responses, petition, read the Change.Org comments and "reverse field" or expect a similar legal action to the one resulting from the Braemar Park "ski hill" nonsense recently. Where there one could interpret a degree of ambiguity with regard to the damages from a "taking". This project as enough hard data, misrepresentation, and high risk of property damage, illegal activity, and evidence that the budget is "fiction" based largely on unsubstantiated claims and blatant deception. Here lies a level of culpability where I think the people in civic positions may rise to a level of being found personally liable, or unfit for their positions. 2 11 101.C111U41 G 1 i.:1%...n.J j 10 Cl 11011111U1 LW 11011 FJC-400CIUU CII 1U LolUU1 Au aquatic habitat. From an ecological view, the dam has altered the function and value of the creek system by removing a mile of habit for spawning and forage for fish below. It increases residence time of water and surface area making the wat€ warmer, increasing algal growth and accumulation of decaying vegetation which uses oxygen and creates an environment that is not good for fish or the in-stream inset that fish eat. To learn more about project benefits see link below. The darn with water (on left) and when dry (on right) Public Input During project development, a bypass pipe alternate was designed to provide fish passage while preserving a value recreational benefit associated with the dam. However, the standing wave no longer forms following flooding in 2014, multi-purpose shelter building. • Existing Path Proposed Stairs Landing Ptoposcd Stairs Propris4t1 lioardssalk Proposed Stairs OVERLOOK PARK-. Park & Viewing Te r rase Rcalig Trait r 54TH STR---E11*.11 STREET Proposed Stairs !XI C zJ rn hR Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:52 PM Subject: FW: Arden meeting 13th Attachments: IMG_0568.PNG; ATT00001.txt Good afternoon, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Tom Jones [mailto:tom@renex.us] Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:03 PM To: edinacreekside@yahoo.com; Edina Mail; jim@jimgrotz.com Subject: Arden meeting 13th Thought I would include this as a "case in point". I now have enough of these, if I print them out, I could wallpaper a powder room ( or same room different use). I have never gotten a call, text, email, letter or any response beyond this exact same reply. So to reiterate, what I thought I had communicated before. I am booked Tuesday, will not be in attendance, am traveling on the 20th will not be in attendance, and have 50 out of town relatives arriving on Wednesday for one of my sons wedding this week, and booked all of today and tomorrow. I do not have the "larger" email list of 110, and have previously stated my reasons for not being the one to post on Next Door, all of my documents and images ( many have been sent to Jim, all have been contained in emails to Stan, along with an exhaustive explanation of all the relevant data). No one has yet distributed the data in any form, as prepared, supplied drafted, other than Jim to the MCWS board. I will reiterate for the last time. "Fight the battle, argue the points, and base it on tubers, kayak, canoe, fishing, meditation, and the nostalgia of the falls and you will lose!!!!" Those arguments have been presented and not just ignored, someone has instead admonished Stan as to his demeanor in communication, I've been referred to as "opining facts I'm uninformed of, as a "layman" ( I guess 9 figures of development, construction, and consulting experience only qualifies as a layman), and once again there is a short notice announcement for a meeting. Previously stated, in spite of the claim "after extensive neighborhood input", I've to date received one post card concerning a meeting in the evening with 2 business days notice. Period! This is consistent with what my other neighbors facing or bordering the park have received. They don't want non controlled input. They do not want the absence of due diligence and quantitative data in the record. They do not want accountability. They do not want to stop! They will go to great lengths to misrepresent the facts. They will continue to ignore the facts, people's opinions, and to do so in deceptive and aggressive fashion. 1 They will not change their position until they are convinced enough people know they are wrong, have intentionally misrepresented, and legal actions will include going after the negligent parties personally, and that their employment suitability be subjected to review. Jim has provided much of the documentation to the MCWS board, and one could presume that helped prompt the 13th meeting ( with their engineer present). When water quality and impaired water come up. I would simplify preemptively state " we have no need to argue or prove what is already in the DNR record, and that clearly excludes Arden Park". When and if the engineer speaks concerning the West Bank, I would again preemptively state there have been no borings, there has likely been no preparation of a "commercial engineering report" ( as required by OSHA per conditions present), the codes and retention requirements are unarguable given the scaled proposal and elevations and topography of record at Hennepin County. That encroachment in a floodway is not permissible, and that irrespective of the work being conducted in the park, the work, encroachments therein, impact up and downstream properties currently in the FEMA flood insurance program ( in the event of catastrophic collapse of the sand hill West Bank, there is the potential to actually change the flood zones, now impacting properties previously not even qualified to purchase flood insurance). The time to stop talking about the falls is now! They don't care! In fact there they have incorporated extraordinary effort to argue the point, and primarily based on inaccurate or non relevant data. The time to expand the dialogue to include the far larger and impactful aspects of the proposal is now! The proposal ends, the destruction of everything ends. Someone needs to make these other points more transparent in a larger format, and before the 13th. I believe they are counting on the public failure to accomplish this. There are many that are convinced none of the big trees would ever be disturbed on the West Bank ( once access roads, retention, stable work surfaces, and paths and decks are constructed, it will look post apocalyptic). That and the noise, equipment storage, and likely 2 years of disruption, only to be followed by the eyesore, liability, road wear and tear ( not to mention the likely enormous budget shortfall). I would strongly consider selling and moving now, but as a homeowner I have a disclosure obligation, as a licensed broker, I'm held to an even higher standard of disclosure. State law requires mandatory disclosures for "material facts that affect the quiet enjoyment or value of the property". Two attorneys have already confirmed this activity and its associated risks, more than exceed the threshold of mandatory disclosure. Please keep notes as to who and what was said, who ( if anyone votes for this, and it passes) as I will need some specifics in this regard, if passed, to begin to seek injunctive relief, begin the likely class action, and suits against those that have misrepresented material facts, facts of record, and have therefor been contributing to damages and losses through gross negligence or deceptive practices. Sadly updating the "warming house" similarly to other facilities, continue buckthorn removal ( believe last, recent effort was free, as a " community service" project for juvenile offenders), remove repair the Nazi swastika signs, clean the bridge construction debris including stump removal ( and then in that location expand/develops better access), add rip rap up and down stream and near upper canoe landing to aid shore stabilization, and many other improvements could be made for far less than $1.5 million ( certainly less than the 5-7 million "Hoveyworld" will cost). None of these are remotely on the MCWS agenda, why aren't they on the Park Board agenda? 2 Janet Canton From: Lynette Biunno on behalf of Edina Mail Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 11:07 AM Subject: FW: Arden Park Restoration Good morning, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Ann Kattreh and Janet Canton. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 Ibiunno@EdinaMN.gov I EdinaMN.gov Original Message From: Chris Wilson [mailto:cwilson@splitrockstudios.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 10:45 AM To: Edina Mail Subject: Arden Park Restoration Re: Arden Park Restoration This project seems like a huge waste of money to us. Restoration of Minnehaha Creek through Arden Park to some prehistoric state without taking out the mill dam at 50th street (a much larger impediment and impoundment), reworking the Lake Nokomis and other lake connections and building a bridge under France Ave. is a pretty meaningless gesture. The notion of habitat restoration is laughable without removing the 50th street dam. Allowing fish to swim perhaps another 1/2 mile in search of better habitat is pretty meaningless. The turbulence of the mill dam at 50th and the low dam at 54th must certainly mitigate the warming and oxygen levels effect of pooling within the 1 mile of creek described in this project. Flood mitigation already occurs in Arden Park. The low land of the park floods with no danger to surrounding homes and ultimately recedes back to recreational area. Flood mitigation will not be affected for people living at the lower end of Woodland Lane until the creek flow under France Ave. is greatly increased with a bridge rather than a culvert. Storm water run off does not really seem to be addressed in your plan. We don't see any retention ponds or diversion channels associated with this project. Quite frankly this project has the smell of a back room deal. I do not know who will benefit financially from the deal but it won't be the people who enjoy the small rapid created by the 54th street dam for fishing, swimming, and boating and we have serious doubts that fish habitat and water quality will benefit either. Jane and I recommend that our city council not proceed with this project. Chris and Jane Wilson 62 Woodland Circle Edina, Mn 55424 952-925-4725 1