Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2018-04-17 City Council Regular Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota City Council Chambers Tuesday, April 17, 2018 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting. V.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session of April 3, 2018 and Regular Meeting of April 3, 2018 B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 3/29/2018 TOTAL: $2,026,567.99 And Per Pre-List Dated 04/05/2018 TOTAL $ 588,311.33 C.Request for Purchase: Well #7 Rehabilitation D.Request For Purchase: 2018 Ford F150 with Ecoboost Engine E.Approve Resolution No. 2018-33: Moving the Polling Place for Edina Precinct 15 to St. Patrick's Catholic Church F.Resolution No. 2018-34: Accepting Livable Communities Demonstration Grant Account Number SG-08939 G.Approve Sub-Grant Agreement: Southdale OCce Partners, LLC H.Resolution 2018-35: Accepting Contamination Cleanup Grant No. CCGP-17-0033-Z-FY17 I.Resolution No. 2018-37: Amending Parking Time Limits in City Owned Parking Facilities J.Resolution No. 2018-40: Extension requesting additional time from the Metropolitan Council for submission of the City of Edina's 2018 Comprehensive Plan K.Approve TraCc Safety Reports of February 16 and March 6, 2018 L.Ordinance No. 2018-06, Resolution No. 2018-41: Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan, and Site Improvement Plan Agreement VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Proclamation: Building Safety Month B.Proclamation: Arbor Day 2018 VII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eCcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2018-07, Resolution No. 2018- 38 & Resolution No. 2018-39; Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for Hazelton LLC at 3650 Hazelton Road VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2018-32: Supporting the 2021 TH169 Noise Wall Improvements by MnDOT B.Edina Dockless Bike Sharing Pilot Program C.2017 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Report D.Sketch Plan Review: 4500 France Avenue E.Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Edina and the East Edina Housing Foundation F.Resolution No. 2018-36: Accepting Various Grants & Donations IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence B.Minutes 1.Minutes: Community Health Commission, January 8, 2018 2.Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission March 13, 2018 X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor And Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments XIII.Schedule of Meetings and Events as of April 17, 2018 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliNcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Work Session of April 3, 2018 and Regular Meeting of April 3, 2018 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Minutes as presented. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft April 3, 2018 Work Session Minutes Draft April 3, 2018 Regular Meeting Minutes MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, APRIL 3, 2018 5:30 P.M. Mayor Jim Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart and Mayor Hovland. Edina City staff attending the meeting were: Ross Bintner, Engineering Services Manager; Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Chante Mitchell, City Management Fellow; Scott Neal, City Manager; Luther Overholt, City Forrester; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager; Tom Swenson, and Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator. Renae Clark, Planner-Project Manager, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Staff COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN – IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSION Jessica Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator, Ross Bintner, Engineering Services Manager and Chad Millner, Engineering Director made a presentation to the Council regarding the implementation of the Comprehensive Management Plan (CWRMP). They reminded that the CWRMP helps to identify issues, define policies, and plan projects/activities to improve surface water outcomes. The plan assists city staff and decision makers in considering impacts from variances and enables development and redevelopment in a systematic, orderly manner while managing water resources. The CWRMP, along with other plans, informs the water resources chapter of the local comprehensive plan. It describes delivery for three core services related to surface water; runoff management, flood control, and clean water. Staff outlined the steps taken to date preparing the draft CWRMP and the next steps before the Council considers the plan for adoption and inclusion in the City’s local Comprehensive Plan. The Council discussed with staff the proposed plan implementation: • Infrastructure and capital investment; including street projects, park improvements and standalone flood mitigation • Development/Redevelopment (Permitting) design standards am to 1) provide 1% annual chance flood risk level of protection in detention area, where feasible; and 2) provide 10% annual chance flood risk level of service, where feasible • Operations and Maintenance, of a system containing more than 2000 structures and about 80 miles of stormwater mains installed in the 1950s and 1960s. Challenges include keeping in mind that the Plan calls for incremental changes that might take a generation to become evident but the Council and staff must still react and assist with immediate issues, i.e. Lake Cornelia, Biscayne Boulevard. It was noted that the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy and Clean Water Strategy would include: • Identify focus geographies • Engage stakeholders • Define the service target • Evaluate strategies (infrastructure, programs, O&M) • Implement (through capital investment, partnerships, private redevelopment, risk management) JOINT WORK SESSION WITH PARKS & RECREATION COMMISION – ARDEN PARK UPDATE Park & Recreation Commissioners attending: Chair Greg Good, Matt Dahlien, Rick Ites, Eileen McAwley, Brenda McCormick, Michael Miller, Koen Hawk Nelson, Julie Strother, and Student Member; Brendan Kiely. Work Session Minutes/Edina City Council/April 3, 2018 2 Director Kattreh, Planner Clark and Manager Bintner updated the Council on the Arden Park Project. The Arden Park design team has been working toward the 60 percent design feedback coming up in May. Ms. Kattreh noted on Saturday, May 5 staff will hold an open house. Staff outlined the proposed storm water plan, explained the location and design of the needed bridges and stairs, and showed examples of the possible North Arden Park creek access and nature trail. They presented more details of the proposed Brookview Trail and the possible ADA trail from Minnehaha Boulevard to the creek planned to have an accessible landing. The cost of the ADA upgrade would be the City’s responsibility. Staff noted that based on the current pre-60 percent design, 68 of 457 trees will need to be removed for construction. Twenty-four ash trees were among the 68 trees slated for removal. Of the 457 trees within the project area, 77 were ash trees. Staff recommended injecting the three significant ash trees in the park to prevent Emerald Ash Borer and hopefully save the trees. Of the significant trees, one sits along Minnehaha Boulevard, one on Brookview Avenue and the other close to the playground. Staff recommended the Council consider removing all 77 ash trees and replacing them with a higher quality tree during the Arden Park project because the trees would be accessible to equipment so removal and replanting could be completed more efficiently. Forrester Overholt explained the difficulty getting equipment in to remove and replant trees once the steps and bridges have been built. Council and the Park & Recreation Commission discussed the design to date, the situation with the trees and the entire Arden Park Project. Council generally was supportive of the design to date but did not have a consensus on the removal of the ash trees and asked for a recommendation from the Park & Recreation Commission. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:58 p.m. Respectfully submitted, _____________________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, April 17, 2018. _____________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 3, 2018 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS AMENDED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to amend the agenda to add Item V.M., Adopt Ordinance No. 2018-05; Final Rezoning: Edina Flats, Valley View Road and Kellogg. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda as amended. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT The Council welcomed freshman students from Edina High School in attendance. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS REVISED Member Fischer a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items V.F. Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Services, LLC, Contract ENG 18-4 Normandale Park D and Bredesen Park A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, $2,353,951.29; and, V.H. Special Permit to Use City Property; 50th and France Business Association, June 1-3, 2018 as follows: V.A. Approve minutes of March 20, 2018, Work Session meeting and March 20, 2018, Regular Council meeting V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on pre-list dated March 15, 2018, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $207,240.60, Police Special Revenue $1.85, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $3,854.95, Conservation & Sustainability $8,326.00, Working Capital Fund $5,993.85, Art Center Fund $9,547.70, Golf Dome Fund $55.00, Aquatic Center Fund $855.14, Golf Course Fund $56,042.04, Ice Arena Fund $22,641.59, Sports Dome Fund $31,161.07, Edinborough Park Fund $5,673.33, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,120.96, Liquor Fund $116,683.58, Utility Fund $49,836.23, Storm Sewer Fund $334.78, Recycling Fund $39,321.72, PSTF Agency Fund $3,724.66, Centennial TIF District, $9,546.75: Total $573,961.80; and per pre-list dated March 15, 2018, Consisting of 1Page: Centennial TIF District: Total $36,727.00; and per pre-list dated March 22, 2018, and consisting of 26 pages: General Fund $156,630.49, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $3,492.20, Working Capital Fund $7,609.24, Equipment Replacement Fund $1,083.50, Art Center Fund $786.38, Golf Dome Fund $2,402.55, Aquatic Center Fund $144.09, Golf Course Fund $5,393.14, Ice Arena Fund $5,904.21, Sports Dome Fund $137.53, Edinborough Park Fund $9,894.41, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $841.27, Liquor Fund $136,531.93, Utility Fund $239,064.25, Storm Sewer Fund $1,934.11, PSTF Agency Fund $7,560.35, Centennial TIF District $8,730.00, Pentagon Park District $14,025.50: Total $602,165.15 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 3, 2018 Page 2 V.C. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, US Digital Design, Fire Station Digital Alerting System, $159,263.00 V.D. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Walser Toyota Scion, Two 2018 Toyota Prius C, $37,768.00 V.E. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Ziegler Cat, 2018 Trail King Trailer, $51,571.49 V.F. Request for Purchase, Contract ENG 18-4 Normandale Park D and Bredesen Park A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction V.G. Cahill Bistro: Approve Amendment to Liquor License Allowing Outdoor Patio V.H. Special Permit to Use City Property; 50th and France Business Association, June 1-3, 2018 V.I. Approve City Manager Employment Agreement V.J. Approve Access Agreement for Morcon Construction – Sherwood Park V.K. Adopt Resolution No. 2018-31 Accepting Livable Communities Demonstration Account Number SG-09008 V.L. Approve Sub-Grant Agreement: Edina Market Street, LLC V.M. Adopt Ordinance No. 2018-05; Final Rezoning: Edina Flats, Valley View Road and Kellogg Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA V.F. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, CONTRACT ENG 18-4 NORMANDALE PARK D AND BREDESEN PARK A NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION – APPROVED The Council noted further information had been requested on how assessments costs were allocated after resident concerns were raised and that after review, the Council was satisfied that staff was allocating costs in an objective manner that varied by project but was fair and consistent. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, approving Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Services, LLC, Contract ENG 18-4 Normandale Park D and Bredesen Park A Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction, $2,353,951.29. Engineer Millner shared a street cross-section and explained how components cost were funded. The Council said they were pleased with communication of street reconstruction projects, adherence to MnDOT standards, and the existing policy but recognized the challenge to address rising costs in general and encouraged re-evaluation to ensure continued fairness. Manager Neal explained the assessment policy was reviewed by Council in 2012 and while there were simpler methods for assessment, those methods were not as fair and the Council decided to remain with the existing policy. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. V.H. SPECIAL PERMIT TO USE CITY PROPERTY; 50TH AND FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, JUNE 1-3, 2018 – APPROVED The Council noted the City-owned parking lot identified as the beer garden area required correction to reflect the Lund’s/Byerly’s surface lot. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to approve Special Permit to use of City property; 50th and France Business Association, June 1-3, 2018 as corrected. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Minutes/Edina City Council/April 3, 2018 Page 3 VI.A. NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS WEEK – PROCLAIMED Lead Dispatcher Martin explained National Telecommunications Week was dedicated to those who serve as Public Safety Telecommunicators and thanked the City’s dispatchers. He explained their work, outlined their challenges, and asked the public to recognize the hard work and dedication of those at the Edina 911 Communications Center. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to proclaim National Telecommunications Week. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. The Council thanked Edina dispatchers for their tremendous crisis management and affirmed the City’s desire to support its own dispatch staff. A round of applause was offered by the audience. VI.B. SPEAK UP, EDINA: BIKE SHARING – PRESENTED Senior Communications Coordinator Kaylin Eidsness outlined the public engagement process used to gather information on bike sharing. Ms. Eidsness presented a summary of comments, requests, and suggestions received and shared the next Speak Up, Edina topic would be the annual tree sale. Mr. Millner indicated a request would be before Council at the next meeting to consider implementation of a pilot bike sharing program. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VII.A. 44TH AND FRANCE SMALL AREA PLAN, RESOLUTION NO. 2018-29 – ADOPTED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague said the Small Area Plan had been reviewed by the Small Area Plan Work Group and found to accurately present outcomes from the 44th/France Small Area Plan study, including the recommended process whereby development proposals could be considered for approval. He noted the 44th/France Small Area Plan Work Group and Planning Commission submitted the plan to the City Council to be adopted as an amendment to the 2008 Comprehensive Plan, which would allow immediate authority upon Metropolitan Council approval. The Small Area Plan would be included in the overall 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. Michael Platterer, 4304 Branson Street, 44th and France Small Area Plan Work Group Member, recognized other group members and outlined the Plan rationale, overall schedule, and explained the iterative process that included feedback and discussion. He outlined the guiding principles, goals and policies, and process following in the Plan creation. Bill Smith, Biko Associates, noted typographical errors within the report for correction, particularly that 30 dwelling units per acre should be reflected as more than 12 dwelling units per acre. The Council discussed the proposed Small Area Plan noting its suggested incentives and process for preserving historically significant structures. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Public Testimony Madelyn Nasser, 3930 W. 44th Street, Morningside Neighborhood Association Steering Committee, addressed the Council. Sara Lathrop, 4008 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Cheryl Appeldorn, 4611 Townes Circle, addressed the Council. Minutes/Edina City Council/April 3, 2018 Page 4 Ted Carlson, 5516 Knoll Drive, addressed the Council. Matt Cramer, 4005 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Richard Cook, 4360 France Avenue South, addressed the Council. Mark Schmidt, 4011 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Charles Myre, 4000 Sunnyside Road, addressed the Council. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. The Council asked questions raised during public testimony regarding the number of attendees at the various neighborhood meetings and limiting building height to a set number of stories and limiting a story to 15 feet. The Council commented on incentives for preserving buildings deemed historic or that contributed to the neighborhood’s character. Mr. Teague explained that zoning ordinance limited buildings to two stories and 24 feet and the Plan allowed up to four stories through a variance or a Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. He said the 30- foot/two stories resulted from the Valleyview and Wooddale Small Area Plan consistent with the height of a single-family home and the reference to 60 feet resulted from recent developments such as Hawthorne at 56 feet tall. The Council referred to traffic calming, potential height, noise, parking and traffic impacts that would be addressed during future projects’ review. Mr. Smith replied language was included regarding traffic study for critical signalized intersection review, especially west to the residential neighborhoods, and referred to including 3907 Sunnyside Road parcel and a second parcel as a buffer. Mr. Teague clarified the Group’s intent that the commercial area would not grow into the residential area. Lisa Fagan, 4164 W. 44th Street, Small Area Plan Group, shared their intent was to include one residential parcel but not both as a compromise. The Council commented on unintended consequences and cautioned about the 20-foot height with two levels of parking noting that while a plan was necessary, some flexibility was desired. The Council suggested using height over the top of a building such as overall maximum heights rather than a specific number of stories, commented on timing of the Small Area Plan and future development applications, and clarified ownership control of the two additional parcels. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Mayor Hovland, to expand the 44th and France Small Area Plan to include 3907 Sunnyside Road to the Study area. Mr. Teague outlined a potential timeline if a Comprehensive Plan amendment was appropriate and noted action would not bind the City to approval of any future rezoning as they would still have the ability to approve or deny a request. He noted the number of stories and height was at Council discretion and Mr. Carlson would then not need a Comprehensive Plan amendment but just rezoning approval. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Stewart, Hovland Nays: Staunton Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved and adoption of Resolution 2018-29 as amended, approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to add the 44th and France Small Area Plan into the City’s Comprehensive with corrections as identified. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Minutes/Edina City Council/April 3, 2018 Page 5 Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Stewart, Staunton, Hovland Motion carried. The Council thanked members of the Small Area Plan Group for their impressive work, as well as the neighborhood members who participated, and noted the Plan created an opportunity to measure a project based on 11 principles, which was key for transition. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS – (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted). VIII.A. AMENDMENT: EDINA AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY – APPROVED Manager Neal said the City’s Affordable Housing Policy included a provision that allowed housing developers to comply with the policy by making a cash payment to the City in lieu of providing affordable housing units He noted the “Buy-In” fee had been left undefined to allow for the opportunity to negotiate unique solutions. Mr. Neal added leaving the fee undefined has led to vague, unpredictable, and unproductive discussions so the Council directed staff to propose an amendment establishing a “Buy-out” amount. He shared that after research, staff was recommending $100,000/unit and explained while the proposed amount was less than other strong residential development markets in the United States, and it far surpassed what other Minnesota cities were doing to generate money for future affordable housing projects. The Council asked how many cities were requiring affordable housing in projects, how many contemplated a buy-in fee, and whether the City was still competitive. Mr. Teague said some cities had similar policies but none had specific zoning Code requirements or a buy-in procedure. He noted the Planned Unit Development tool could create inclusionary zoning. The Council discussed concerns about maintaining a balance for developers, how much of a fee would be too much, but stressed the importance of supporting affordable housing for the future. They concluded that the buy-in fee could be amended if necessary. The Council discussed that after ensuring affordable housing long-term, park dedication needed to be confronted to ensure park sustainability as well. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to adopt the Edina Affordable Housing Policy to establish a buy-in fee of $100,000/unit based on the following: 1. The Total Buy In (TBI) is due in cash or certified funds in full to the City at the time of the issuance of the building permit. A building permit will not be issued unless the TBI is paid in full. 2. The City Council may allow housing developer to pre-pay a TBI to satisfy a future Affordable Housing Obligation, on a case by-case basis. 3. The TBI fee to be reviewed annually and amended as necessary. The Council inquired about possible amendments to park dedication. Mr. Neal referred the Council to Edina’s State Legislators because parkland dedication amounts were determined by Statute. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION 2018-30 ADOPTED - ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS - ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-30 accepting various grants and donations. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. Minutes/Edina City Council/April 3, 2018 Page 6 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES 1. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION, FEBRUARY 13, 2018 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF APRIL 3, 2018 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 17, 2018. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the April 3, 2018, meeting available. Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 3/29/2018 TOTAL: $2,026,567.99 And Per Pre-List Dated 04/05/2018 TOTAL $ 588,311.33 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment. INTRODUCTION: Claims information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Claims Pre-List Dated 03/29/2018 TOTAL: $2,026,567.99 Claims Pre-List Dated 04/05/2018 TOTAL: $588,311.33 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 1 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6215 3/29/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 68.14 456369 2216327 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 51.52 456341 2219942 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 68.50 456333 2219949 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 188.16 6216 3/29/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,284.90 456371 63297000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 251.55 456331 63383600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 81.55 456421 63383700 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 497.30 456434 63383800 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,786.50 456426 63408900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 979.95 456427 63409000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 105.55 456432 63409100 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.55 456422 63409300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 147.68 456396 97328300 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 51.00 456397 97328400 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 57.30 456425 97360100 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.36 456329 97360200 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 81.67 456420 97360300 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,497.86 6217 3/29/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 99.87 INK CARTRIDGE GREEN HOUSE 456681 137467 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 456472 137469 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 123.50 6218 3/29/2018 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 134.84 ANTIFREEZE 456520 1217491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 447.90 ELEMENTS, BRAKES 456522 1217693 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.83- CREDIT MEMO 456653 CM1213730 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.08- CREDIT MEMO 456654 CM1213929 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 482.83 6219 3/29/2018 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 9,490.00 BRIDGE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 456551 B123946 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 9,490.00 6220 3/29/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 270.56 WIPES/SANITIZERS/PENS 456507 OE-475616-1 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 310.34 456337 WO-367672-1 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 — 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 2 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6220 3/29/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS Continued... 44.72 456340 WO-367795-1 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 73.49 SUPPLIES 456662 WO-369686-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 699.11 6221 3/29/2018 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 744.89 MN-TF1: UQT3 OT/BF 456231 18001 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 744.89 6222 3/29/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 168.00 456499 67-3632 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 168.00 6223 3/29/2018 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 251.82 CONCESSIONS FOOD 456657 2394 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 251.82 6224 3/29/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 180.00 ADVERTISING 456659 580128 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENAADMINISTRATION 180.00 6225 3/29/2018 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 48,500.53 LODGING TAX - FEBRUARY 456696 032718 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 48,500.53 6226 3/29/2018 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 2,034.00 SOUTH INHIBITER 456464 57450 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 3,777.87 EAST SHAFT SEAL REPAIR 456465 57452 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,351.00 SOUTH REPAIRS 456466 57453 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 7,162.87 6227 3/29/2018 124541 GEYEN GROUP 256.50 CARPET CLEANING 456552 30767 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 256.50 6228 3/29/2018 129508 IMPACT 3,562.28 456697 131468 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,562.28 6229 3/29/2018 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 73.00 POSTERBOARD FOR INSERVICE 456307 678647 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 - Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6229 3/29/2018 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 127057 MARSDEN BLDG MAINTENANCE LLC Continued... 6230 3/29/2018 73.00 3,099.80 CLEANING SERVICE 456256 258076 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,099.80 6231 3/29/2018 101483 MENARDS 16.86 GENERAL SUPPLIES 456677 064344 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 26.97 BUILDING EXPENSE 456283 63772 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 47.36 BOLTS, BITS 456210 63777 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 62.43 LADDER, WOOD 456211 63906 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 54.88 PD BREAKROOM RENO 456207 63982 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.74 GENERAL SUPPLIES 456675 64171 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 30.87 GENERAL SUPPLIES 456676 64257 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 68.92 CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES 456648 64269 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 20.55 SHEETROCK SUPPLIES 456646 64272 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 52.74 PARACORD, DOORSTOP 456682 64281 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 274.88 1X6X16' GREEN TREATED 456645 64296 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 34.48 GENERAL SUPPLIES 456458 64333 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 59.76 MOVER'S DOLLY X4 456649 64348 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 154.98 TOOLS 456613 64352 5921.6556 TOOLS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 4.58 STORAGE HANGER 456647 64373 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.94 3/4" PLYWOOD 456650 64454 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 382.45 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL 456693 64683 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 54.87 SHELF X2/ BRACKET X2 456694 64704 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,425.26 6232 3/29/2018 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 2,100.00 INFLATION UNIT CONTRACT 456175 7595 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 2,100.00 6233 3/29/2018 129485 PAPCO INC. 239.26 CLEANING SUPPLIES 456623 206158 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 239.26 6234 3/29/2018 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 508.36 TIRES 456515 210336345 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 251.25 TIRES 456516 210338343 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 759.61 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 4 Business Unit 6235 3/29/2018 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. Continued-. 405.41 BOARD BRUSH 456583 0064774-IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 405.41 6236 3/29/2018 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 43.88 BUSINESS CARDS - HALES 456619 99145 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 53.87 BUSINESS CARDS - TUCKER 456619 99145 9210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HRAADMINISTRATION 97.75 6237 3/29/2018 104672 SPRINT 16.91 456609 873184124 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 183-3/18 16.91 456609 873184124 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 183-3/18 50.73 456609 873184124 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 183-3/18 51.60 456609 873184124 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 183-3/18 58.77 456609 873184124 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 183-3/18 87.47 456609 873184124 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 183-3/18 115.30 456609 873184124 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 183-3/18 78.56 456609 873184124 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 183-3/18 476.25 6238 3/29/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 238.60 WTP6 FILTER PARTS 456461 S3574614.001 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 238.60 6239 3/29/2018 101015 STREICHERS 1,234.99 UTM ROUNDS 900 PURCHASED 2017 456309 11298584 1401.6551 AMMUNITION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 1,234.99 6240 3/29/2018 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 58.92 FILTERS 456664 E105254 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.92 6241 3/29/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 5 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6241 3/29/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA Continued... 284.00 456431 203006 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 991.50 456614 203177 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,275.50 6242 3/29/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 596.40 456308 63708 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 725.90 456357 64693 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 382.30 456267 65928 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 735.55 456246 65944 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,440.15 423227 3/29/2018 105696 3CMA 400.00 3CMA DUES 456573 3CMA DUES 2018 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 400.00 423228 3/29/2018 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 171.75 456443 E-5578 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 171.75 423229 3/29/2018 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 159.07 FOR ARNESON ACRES 456630 649560 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 159.07 423230 3/29/2018 129458 ACME TOOLS 1,081.00 456314 5607355 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.93 PASLODE FUEL CELL 456643 5625162 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,106.93 423231 3/29/2018 100271 ALLSTATE PETERBILT 167.92 FILTER 456521 3004140277 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 167.92 423232 3/29/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 172.23 BUILDING - GENERAL SUPPLIES 456590 1FHY-X6G9-3XV9 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 25.17 !PHONE CASE FOR VKONTERS 456570 1FJ9-G7VQ-D3C4 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 71.74 SMOKE ABSORBER FOR SOLDERING 456287 1G LV-TH7V-9C7J 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 34.75 DOOR HANDLES 456578 1GP3-GX91-JQKJ 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 58.76 LADDER ACCESSORIES 456456 1HMY-7KNX-FJ61 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 591.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES 456589 1HYF-N1MT-41T9 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 954.61 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 - Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423232 423233 3/29/2018 3/29/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. Continued... 140.10 456336 1004080527 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 215.53 456660 1004085546 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 355.63 423234 3/29/2018 141972 AP MIDWEST LLC 958,683.95 NORTH RAMP EXPANSION AP 456190 APPL 2 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 958,683.95 423235 3/29/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,067.40 456227 3247825 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,110.50 456370 3248320 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 502.50 456335 3249391 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27.88- 456446 414040 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 52.08- 456363 415404 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 83.10- 456361 415405 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,517.34 423236 3/29/2018 141378 BALD MAN BREWING INC. 133.20 456373 E-2059 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 133.20 423237 3/29/2018 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 79.96 FA SYSTEM BACKUP BATTERIES 456661 018-463053 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 108.95 BATTERY 456667 018-463063 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 188.91 423238 3/29/2018 139805 BAULER, NICK 220.72 EXPENSE REPORT 456248 032018 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION 220.72 423239 3/29/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 34.99 456416 412662 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 595.25 456406 412663 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,543.70 456338 413949A 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,050.98 456214 413952 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 40.00 456418 415250 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 677.15 456453 415251 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 768.90 456297 415389 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 - Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423239 3/29/2018 125139 BERNICK'S Continued... 4,710.97 423240 3/29/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 315.00 456226 2064 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 282.00 456296 2112 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 597.00 423241 3/29/2018 131967 BOLLIG & SONS 2,500.00 5505 KELLOGG AVE DEMO 456266 158956 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 4209 BRANSON ST 456265 160128 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 6104 CRESCENT DR 456598 160564 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 456412 ED157289 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 456410 ED158107 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 456411 ED159856 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 15,000.00 423242 3/29/2018 136726 BOSS CONTROL SYSTEMS INC. 50.30 CUSTOM LABELS 456690 502993 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 50.30 423243 3/29/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 607.50 456437 149116 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 771.50 456249 149500 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 84.00 456355 149501 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,463.00 423244 3/29/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 191.45 456378 1080768912 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 945.09 456239 1080775192 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.30 456238 1080775193 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,624.05 456240 1080775244 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 64.13 456237 1080775245 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,029.91 456300 1080775246 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 80.95 456264 1080775247 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 908.16 456430 1080775249 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,990.04 423245 3/29/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 8,885.31 456383 1090829051 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,249.55 456286 1090834732 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 - Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423245 3/29/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC Continued... 2,457.90 456392 1090834733 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12,592.76 423246 3/29/2018 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 561.60 MERCHANDISE 456556 928798803 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 156.00 MERCHANDISE 456548 928798804 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 673.20 MERCHANDISE 456549 928814597 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 151.85 MERCHANDISE 456550 928851707 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,542.65 423247 3/29/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 7,266.95 456374 2075063 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,796.30 456290 2081007 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,605.95 456387 2081009 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,026.65 456242 2081011 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12,695.85 423248 3/29/2018 141269 CAYAN 678.85 456683 597468 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 330.70 456684 597955 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL 554.80 456685 600580 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,564.35 423249 3/29/2018 102496 CEMSTONE CONTRACTOR SUPPLY- VEND #101515 210.11 PD BREAKROOM RENO 456592 374106 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 210.11 423250 3/29/2018 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 43.04 POLISHING PADS 456641 374384 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 43.04 423251 3/29/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 63.98 450928 0146-12/17 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 176.38 450928 0146-12/17 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 178.65 450928 0146-12/17 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 309.68 450928 0146-12/17 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 310.00 450928 0146-12/17 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 60.26 450928 0146-12/17 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 39.59 450928 0146-12/17 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 591.40 612 E01-0426 451209 0426-1/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 9 Business Unit 423251 3/29/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 93.88 952 941-1019 450931 1019-12/17 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 62.15 952 835-1161 451208 1161-1/18 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 61.91 952 941-1410 450929 1410-12/17 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 64.04 456597 6522-3/18 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 219.87 952 835-6661 451207 6661-1/18 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 591.40 612 E12-6797 451210 6797-1/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 117.15 952 826-7398 450930 7398-12/17 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 2,940.34 423252 3/29/2018 129154 CHECKPOINT WELDING & FAB INC. 1,380.00 FUEL TANK 456313 161444 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,380.00 423253 3/29/2018 129285 CHINOOK BOOK 1,174.60 CHINOOK BOOK AD 456579 1629 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,174.60 423254 3/29/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 14.44 RENTAL UNIFORM 456492 4004534299 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 36.26 LAUNDRY 456490 4004534333 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 49.00 RENTAL UNIFORM 456489 4004534358 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19.89 RENTAL UNIFORM 456491 4004534377 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 37.84 RENTAL UNIFORM 456493 4004534430 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.43 423255 3/29/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 101.63 456626 012920000-3/18 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER YORK OCCUPANCY 101.63 423256 3/29/2018 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 466.88 456423 3641205439 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 466.88 423257 3/29/2018 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 1,054.83 456625 M424-002073-APR 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY IL 1,054.83 423258 3/29/2018 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 879.94 CRAFT SUPPLIES- CLAY 456536 INV000124055 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423258 3/29/2018 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. Continued... 162.15 CRAFT SUPPLIES- CLAY 456537 INV000124056 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,042.09 423259 3/29/2018 102596 CROWN TROPHY 15.95 OFFICER OF THE YEAR TROPHY 456213 21913 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15.95 423260 3/29/2018 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 326.68 CUSTOM MADE HOSE 456528 91450 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 268.63 TWIN LINE HOSE 456680 91508 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 595.31 423261 3/29/2018 142172 DEAN, ROBERT 40.00 AMB REF 42873421 456354 3212018 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 423262 3/29/2018 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 103.71 TOOLS 456566 43864 5921.6556 TOOLS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 28.22 GAUGE 456523 44084 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.04 456656 44214 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 198.97 423263 3/29/2018 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL 513.00 LESSONS 3/8-3/21/18 456564 32318 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 513.00 423264 3/29/2018 122079 EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES 1,431.00 WRESTLING GYM SPACE 456576 1718-2312 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 474.00 ADULT VOLLEYBALL GYM SPACE 456575 1718-2481 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 40.50 WRESTLING GYM SPACE 456574 1718-3535 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 1,945.50 423265 3/29/2018 135843 EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC 699.77 SOUTH WATER SOFTNER REPAIR 456212 903465591 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 699.77 423266 3/29/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 573.22- CREDIT MEMO 456513 1-5521163 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 188.10 GLOVES 456651 1-5530592 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 263.59 BATTERIES 456519 1-Z13956 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 11 Business Unit 423266 3/29/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 115.00 BRAKE DRUMS 456511 69.303920 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.87 OIL 456512 69-304232 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.34 423267 3/29/2018 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 945.00 LESSONS 3/8-3/21/18 456562 32318 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 945.00 423268 3/29/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 49.24 METER PARTS 456691 0275870 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 49.24 423269 3/29/2018 130699 FLEETPRIDE 78.24 SHELVING 456518 92974715 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 78.24 SHELVING 456620 92980130 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 156.48 423270 3/29/2018 142164 FRANKLIN PRESS INCORPORATED 1,146.00 MN-TF1 SHORING OPS GUIDEBOOKS 456232 13305 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,146.00 423271 3/29/2018 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 51.07 MUSIC IN EDINA GEN SUP 456346 032118 2611.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MUSIC IN EDINA 17.70 BUILDING - GENERAL SUPPLIES 456346 032118 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 27.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 456346 032118 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 29.67 GENERAL SUPPLIES -ART CENTER 456346 032118 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 125.80 423272 3/29/2018 102456 GALLS INC. 7.98 RESERVES 456594 007591387 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 56.99 RESERVES 456568 007783891 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 96.99 RESERVES 456593 008119623 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 9.99 RESERVES - OK PER BOERGER 456569 008147259 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 171.95 423273 3/29/2018 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 197.00 SKATE REPAIR AND SHARPENING 456558 93869 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 2,268.75 UNIFORMS 456559 93872 5520.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS 2,465.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 - Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423274 3/29/2018 134210 GOPHER BEARING Continued... 59.55 V-BELT 456612 6340483 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 59.55 423275 3/29/2018 101103 GRAINGER 119.64 BUILDING - ELECTRICAL PARTS 456206 9728772873 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 41.88 TOOLS TK 456508 9731597143 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 28.10 TOOLS TK 456509 9731597150 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 195.12 RAINSUITS 456485 9731919065 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 216.80 RAIN SUITS 456483 9731919073 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 44.80 #2 BITS 456480 9731919081 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.00 456484 9732346391 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.96 RAINSUITS 456484 9732346391 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 200.00 RAINSUITS 456484 9732346391 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 200.00 RAINSUITS 456484 9732346391 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 111.52 REPLACEMENT HINGES 456481 9733141700 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 111.72 RED SPRAY PAINT FOR HYDRANTS 456462 9733482625 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 1,384.54 423276 3/29/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 184.50 456294 MN00036881 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.25 456429 PAV1689287 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 330.75 423277 3/29/2018 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 774.00 LESSONS 3/8-3/21/18 456561 32318 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 774.00 423278 3/29/2018 140010 GROUP HEALTH INC.-WORKSITE 368.00 FEB EAP INVOICE 456403 W814657 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 368.00 423279 3/29/2018 141531 HASTINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT 312.10 MN-TF1: LOGISTICS 3/7/2018 456228 03202018A 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 312.10 423280 3/29/2018 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 28,864.39 APRIL HP INVOICE-NONACTIVES 456469 79793552 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 267,464.00 APRIL HP INVOICE-ACTIVES 456470 79795258 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 296,328.39 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423281 3/29/2018 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER Continued-. 2,550.00 6 EMT REGISTRATIONS 456655 55123 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,550.00 423282 3/29/2018 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 154.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 456457 51489906 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 154.00 423283 3/29/2018 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 656.98 POLICE REC TECH PC 456306 59727061 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 656.98 EQUIP OPER PC 456306 59727061 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9,854.70 EQUIP REPL PC'S 456306 59727061 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,970.94 3 SCADA PC REPL 456306 59727061 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 13,139.60 423284 3/29/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,988.75 456414 950043 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,316.00 456243 952622 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,050.00 456295 952623 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,354.75 423285 3/29/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 17.76 WIPER BLADES 456525 038039120 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.47 FILTERS 456621 038039287 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.97 FILTER 456652 038039385 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 167.45 FILTERS 456668 038039396 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.20 FILTER 456669 038039480 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 326.85 423286 3/29/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 871.20 456442 61463 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 573.20 456419 61927 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 199.50 456533 61930 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 406.20 456271 61931 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.50 456270 61932 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,135.60 423287 3/29/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 6,527.40 456409 2787523 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 118.95 456358 2787526 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 559.13 456303 2787530 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 - Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423287 3/29/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 4,608.85 456375 2787531 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,293.65 456215 2787534 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 46.21- 456377 2787535 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 53.20- 456216 2787536 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14,008.57 423288 3/29/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 656.93 456318 5966567 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,001.18 456319 5966568 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,318.52 456321 5966569 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 628.76 456384 5966570 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 413.02 456322 5966571 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 187.86 456324 5966572 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 115.19 456417 5966573 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,762.76 456347 5966574 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,603.43 456413 5966575 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,125.99 456343 5966577 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 134.38 456382 5966578 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,442.04 456388 5966579 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,687.32 456339 5966581 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,627.16 456448 5966585 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,484.64 456433 5966586 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,582.94 456449 5966587 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 979.17 456447 5966588 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 556.82 456450 5966589 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.33- 456349 659875A 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 205.19- 456268 671117 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.09- 456254 671118 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.44- 456253 671119 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 100.18- 456269 671290 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22,969.88 423289 3/29/2018 133739 KFD TRAINING & CONSULTATION LLC 1,500.00 LEADS COURSE 456624 2349 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,500.00 423290 3/29/2018 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC. 6,661.09 GR GREEN TRANSP STUDY 456398 10934817 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 6,661.09 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 — 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 15 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423291 3/29/2018 115192 KNUDSON, DEBORAH Continued... 1,071.00 LESSONS 3/8-3/21/18 456563 32318 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,071.00 423292 3/29/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 736.84 SCREWS WASHERS TERMINALS NUTS 456665 9305691244 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 736.84 423293 3/29/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 526.92 FEB WC DEDUCTIBLE INVOICE 456401 1003628-3/18 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 526.92 423294 3/29/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,077.43 FEB WC DEDUCTIBLE INVOICE2 456402 0200120002-3/18 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 1,077.43 423295 3/29/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 15,440.96 PD LOSSES FOR CLAIM 1-15-18 456467 3362 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 15,440.96 423296 3/29/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 128,054.00 LMC QUARTERLY INVOICE 456468 40000853030518 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 128,054.00 423297 3/29/2018 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 129.50 456241 13640 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 129.50 423298 3/29/2018 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 1,166.34 MARCH CI AND ACC INVOICE 456404 MARCH2018 9900.2033.28 ACCIDENTAND CRITICAL INS PAYROLL CLEARING 1,166.34 423299 3/29/2018 136027 LINA 4,700.74 MARCH LTD INVOICE 456405 160051180301181 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 80607-3/18 4,700.74 423300 3/29/2018 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 394.90 CYLINDER 456663 351580 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 394.90 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 — Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423301 3/29/2018 141916 LUPULIN BREWING Continued-. 2,004.00 456441 11011 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,004.00 423302 3/29/2018 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 36.42 DIRT DEFLECTOR 456517 P11453 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 139.15 PIVOT SHAFT 456526 P11531 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 114.03 FILTERS 456666 P11590 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 289.60 423303 3/29/2018 142185 MAHCO 100.00 MAHCO DUES - EDINA 456611 03262018 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 100.00 423304 3/29/2018 105297 MAYER ELECTRIC CORP. 458.83 #9 FIRE PULL STATION REPAIR 456658 35287 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 458.83 423305 3/29/2018 100883 MESSERLI & KRAMER 5,000.00 GRANDVIEW GREEN LEGAL 456473 348963 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 5,000.00 423306 3/29/2018 137831 METRO WATERSHED PARTNERS 2,550.00 MEMBERSHIP 456208 2018 CLEAN 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM WATER MN 2,550.00 423307 3/29/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 392.31 CONTRACTED REPAIR 456524 329090 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 392.31 423308 3/29/2018 100019 MIDWEST ART FAIRS 56.85 SUBSCRIPTIONS 456586 1295 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 56.85 423309 3/29/2018 102769 MILLER, TOM 346.50 LESSONS 3/8-3/21/18 456565 32318 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 346.50 423310 3/29/2018 116770 MINNEAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT 13,943.58 MN-TF1: UQT3 OT/BF 456285 031618 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 — 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 17 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423310 3/29/2018 116770 MINNEAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT Continued... 13,943.58 423311 3/29/2018 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.38 456330 180101107 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.51 456332 180101108 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 16.13 456334 180101109 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 5.38 456327 180103182 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.51 456328 180103183 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 69.91 423312 3/29/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 49.00 SPRING EVENT POSTERS 456506 24749 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 54.00 456587 24763 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 103.00 423313 3/29/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 370.13 456428 4732 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 370.13 423314 3/29/2018 140948 MOHAGEN / HANSEN ARCHITECTURAL GROUP 20,145.62 NORTH RAMP EXP - DESIGN 456399 42674 9232,6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 20,145.62 423315 3/29/2018 142174 MP DESIGN 1,700.00 CLASS/INSTRUCTOR FEE 456555 3212018 5420.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CLUB HOUSE 1,700.00 423316 3/29/2018 101796 MPCA 243.53 ANNUAL DUES 456584 10000046831 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 243.53 423317 3/29/2018 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES INC. 49.00 PLAQUE 456474 IN1208325 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 49.00 423318 3/29/2018 130266 MUNICODE 871.00 SUPPLEMENT 8 TO CITY CODE 456284 00305786 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 871.00 423319 3/29/2018 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 - Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423319 3/29/2018 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS Continued... 44.78 FILTER 456622 2122-312268 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.64 HOSE 456671 2122-312545 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.41 HOSE 456670 2122-312576 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 165.83 423320 3/29/2018 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 112.00 ADVERTISING 456588 N10347136 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 112.00 423321 3/29/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 1,412.00 456444 129183 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 89.50 456539 16819 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 187.00 456245 2018 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,688.50 423322 3/29/2018 142161 NEXBELT, LLC 709.80 MERCHANDISE 456540 85411 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 709.80 423323 3/29/2018 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH 156.96 DIETRICH EDINA TV MILEAGE 456304 032018 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 87.20 DIETRICH SVVTV MILEAGE 456305 0320182 1132.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CABLE COMMISSION 244.16 423324 3/29/2018 139023 NUSS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT 133,062.00 EXCAVATOR 456317 1916 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 133,062.00 423325 3/29/2018 134814 NUVEEN ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 6,934.91 4TH QTR. IA FEE 456596 185717 1001.4706 INCOME ON INVESTMENTS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 6,934.91 423326 3/29/2018 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 519.98 WHITE BOARD 456176 113289504001 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 519.98 423327 3/29/2018 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 44.55 LANGUAGE LINE- BOOKING 456591 W18020659 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 44.55 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page- 19 Business Unit 423328 3/29/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES Continued... 183.88 RATCHET BINDER/STRAPS 456642 616141 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 183.88 423329 3/29/2018 142165 OLSON, SEAN 58.50 MN-TF1: UQT3 REHAB SUPPLIES 456233 032018B 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 58.50 423330 3/29/2018 101659 ORKIN 24.20 PEST CONTROL 456531 167720851 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 24.20 PEST CONTROL 456532 167721637 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 135.20 PEST CONTROL 456530 167721643 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 183.60 423331 3/29/2018 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 219.00 456615 17336 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 219.00 423332 3/29/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,019.25 456386 3203 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 982.15 456381 3349 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.00 456376 3350 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,269.37 456436 41534 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 311.00 456288 4895 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,163.50 456236 4896 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,832.27 423333 3/29/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 878.40 456534 61826714 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 315.56 CONCESSIONS FOOD 456557 67339008 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 93.79 PEPSI 456560 67339009 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,287.75 423334 3/29/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 811.90 456368 2324569 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.69 456366 2324572 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,178.86 456364 2324573 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.19 456356 2328198 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.38 456302 2328199 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 330.70 456301 2328200 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,353.80 456326 2328201 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 — Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423334 3/29/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 73.19 456393 2328203 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 925.96 456391 2328204 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,903.82 456390 2328205 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 220.76 456438 2328208 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 462.03 456440 2328209 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,625.07 456439 2328210 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 113.47- 456250 289808 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 89.19- 456252 289809 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 37.19- 456251 289810 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.77- 456538 289922 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11,827.73 423335 3/29/2018 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 237.06 HOSE REPAIR 456554 S2666863.001 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 237.06 423336 3/29/2018 142171 POSTMASTER 225.00 MAILING REQUIREMENTS 456353 02 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 225.00 423337 3/29/2018 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 5,591.94 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 456345 032118 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 5,591.94 423338 3/29/2018 130260 PROFORMA 1,978.58 NORTH RAMP EXP - PR WAYFIND 456627 90M5201606 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,978.58 423339 3/29/2018 135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT 4,160.00 TRACK TIRES 456311 137848 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,160.00 423340 3/29/2018 141552 RANGER CHEVROLET 26,577.40 NEW UNMARKED VEHICLE 456692 23138 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 26,577.40 423341 3/29/2018 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 72.00 456616 K-49854070 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 72.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page - 21 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423342 3/29/2018 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT Continued... 3,219.07 MN-TF1: UQT3 OT/BF 456229 032018C 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 3,219.07 423343 3/29/2018 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,040.04 MN-TF1: EQUIP. & CONSUMABLES 456230 032018D 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,040.04 423344 3/29/2018 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 307.50 456435 18-00952 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 215.04 456289 18-01232 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 522.54 423345 3/29/2018 138162 ROSEMOUNT SAW S, TOOL CO. 249.40 HEDGETRIMMERS 456679 254558 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 249.40 423346 3/29/2018 134173 SAFE-FAST INC. 4.52 SAFETY GLASSES 456494 INV196851 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50.00 SAFETY GLASSES 456494 INV196851 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 SAFETY GLASSES 456494 INV196851 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 100.00 SAFETY GLASSES 456494 INV196851 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 254.52 423347 3/29/2018 100995 SEH 960.92 2017 PARKLAWN 456595 347652 01444.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Parklawn Ave 191.25 2017 PARKLAWN 456595 347652 03501.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Parklawn Ave 113.50 2017 PARKLAWN 456595 347652 04423.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Parklawn Ave 289.21 2017 PARKLAWN 456595 347652 04423.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Parklawn Ave 4,034.09 VERNON/INTERLACHEN 456631 347654 9232.6133 PROFESS SERVICES-ENGINEERING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 5,588.97 423348 3/29/2018 133883 SERVPRO OF EAGAN/APPLE VALLEY 2,104.94 6232 HANSEN BIOHAZARD REMED 456454 5021213 03504.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Birchcrest A/Countryside B 2,104.94 423349 3/29/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 155.11 NORTH RAMP EXP - PR WAYFIND 456628 12717 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 596.00 DASHERBOARD FABRICATION 456572 12731 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 68.00 456686 12753 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 68.00 456686 12753 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page - 22 Business Unit 423349 3/29/2018 120784 SIGN PRO Continued-. 68.00 456686 12753 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 164.16 NORTH RAMP EXP - WAYFIND SIGN 456632 12754 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,119.27 423350 3/29/2018 116501 SIMONSON, JUSTIN 104.00 CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 456209 031618 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 104.00 423351 3/29/2018 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 43.93 ICE MELT 456553 84559265 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 43.93 423352 3/29/2018 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 140.00 WATERSTREET LEADS 456571 9522 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 140.00 423353 3/29/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 27.00- 456365 0038697 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.42- 456367 0038698 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.00- 456362 0038699 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,114.37 456352 01659002 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,964.52 456350 01659004 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .30 456315 1631138 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,017.64 456320 1636070A 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.13 456312 1637301 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,580.91 456360 1656300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 62.66 456395 1656301 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 46.11 456389 1656302 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,132.80 456394 1656303 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,748.40 456372 1656304 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 103.10 456293 1661663 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 262.51 456291 1661664 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,949.68 456299 1661665 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 789.16 456385 1661667 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 103.10 456380 1661669 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,212.91 456535 1661670 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 600.00 456424 1661671 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,475.04 456348 1661672 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.60 456235 1661673 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 347.36 456217 1661674 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page - 23 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423353 3/29/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 1,992.29 456247 1661675 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,340.80 456218 1661676 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,861.80 456234 1661677 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 39,673.77 423354 3/29/2018 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 25,137.46 NORTH RAMP EXP-OWNER REP 456400 10930-6 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 25,137.46 423355 3/29/2018 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 70.49 STAR TRIB SUBSCRIPTION 456257 10129303-3/18 5552.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 70.49 423356 3/29/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 284.00 456445 20277 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 436.80 456244 20530 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 720.80 423357 3/29/2018 135803 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6,753.20 MARCH LIFE INS-ACTIVES 456407 237716-001-3/18 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 185.50 MARCH LIFE INS-NONACTIVES 456408 237716-901-3/18 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 6,938.70 423358 3/29/2018 141470 SUPERION, LLC 480.00 SUPERION TRAINING MOBILE TIME 456581 204890 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 640.00 SUPERION TRAINING CAD TIME 456581 204890 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 1,120.00 423359 3/29/2018 106673 TAPCO 2,626.02 PED. ST. SIGN BASES 456672 1595751 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 2,626.02 423360 3/29/2018 104932 TAYLOR MADE 46.06 MERCHANDISE 451617 32810362 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,252.00- RETURNED PRODUCT 448914 32942666 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 295.00- RETURNED PRODUCT 450021 32952171 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 734.49 MERCHANDISE 454673 33016104 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 569.78 MERCHANDISE 456541 33050171 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 298.59 MERCHANDISE 456542 33050172 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 609.05 MERCHANDISE 456543 33050364 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page - 24 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423360 3/29/2018 104932 TAYLOR MADE Continued... 877.35 MERCHANDISE 456545 33054085 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 716.41 MERCHANDISE 456546 33054095 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 273.34 MERCHANDISE 456547 33054205 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,385.42 MERCHANDISE 456544 33057128 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,963.49 423361 3/29/2018 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 142.00 DRAFT 3/6/18 CC MINUTES 456674 M23629 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 142.00 423362 3/29/2018 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC 212.00 456415 E-2155 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 212.00 423363 3/29/2018 123649 TOWMASTER 633.53- CREDIT MEMO 2018 453243 110505 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.88 VIBRATOR 2018 453242 400581 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 645.09 VIBRATOR 456527 402058 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.44 423364 3/29/2018 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 391.40 FILTERS 456463 0632904-IN 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 391.40 423365 3/29/2018 122321 ULTIMATE DRAIN SERVICES INC. 420.00 CONTRACTED SERVICES 456585 57969 5110.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 420.00 423366 3/29/2018 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 11.45 GLOVE TEST SHIPPING 456510 TRAN: 5968 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 11.16 456678 TRAN:1749 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22.61 423367 3/29/2018 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 90.90 GLOVES 456459 520503 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 230.80 REPAIR PARTS 456459 520503 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 430.76 TOOLS 456459 520503 5915.6556 TOOLS WATER TREATMENT 34.39 FIRSTAID SIGN 456460 520636 5915.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT WATER TREATMENT 786.85 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423368 3/29/2018 101058 VAN PAPER CO. Continued... 82.53 456342 456849-00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 7.07 456689 456849-01 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 625.40 456344 456850-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 33.72 456687 457312-00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 739.61 456688 457313-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,488.33 423369 3/29/2018 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 76.50 ELECTRICAL LUGS 456582 S001350867.001 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 120.93 WELL 6 VFD 456567 S001350867.002 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 197.43 423370 3/29/2018 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 228.62 SAFETY VESTS 456455 3132000 5760.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 228.62 423371 3/29/2018 137833 VIKING TROPHIES AWARDS & RECONGNITION 1,211.50 RECOGNITION AWARDS 456471 133694 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 1,211.50 423372 3/29/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 752.71 50 FRANCE RAMP/BESPOKE 456673 7751687-2282-2 9232.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 752.71 423373 3/29/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 596.40- 456310 63708CR 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 438.57 456452 7175791 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 616.95 456325 7175792 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 438.57 456359 7175793 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 61.07 456351 7175795 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,210.33 456379 7175796 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,547.90 456451 7175797 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,716.99 423374 3/29/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 42.63 456610 582319763 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,115.51 456607 582402272 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,603.62 456607 582402272 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,849.42 456607 582402272 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 535.90 456606 582423378 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:08 Council Check Register by GL Page- 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 3/29/2018 — Inv No 3/29/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423374 3/29/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 2,703.05 456608 582554971 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 36.92 456605 582574059 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 55.61 456600 582787494 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 3,561.47 456601 582930933 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 552.52 456602 582931928 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,487.91 456604 582945976 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 681.05 456603 583307101 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 3,300.33 456599 584568566 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 18,525.94 423375 3/29/2018 104324 YOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO. 49.95 MAPLE BOARDS 456644 00028477-001 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 49.95 423376 3/29/2018 141380 ZEWDIE, YARED 239.47 UNIFORM JEANS, HAT 2018 456316 032018 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 239.47 423377 3/29/2018 101091 ZIEGLER INC 41.98- CREDIT MEMO 456514 PR000160125 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.91 CONTRACTED REPAIR 456529 SW100195074 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.93 2,026,567.99 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,933,335.14 A/P ACH Payment 93,232.85 Total Payments 2,026,567.99 CITY OF EDINA 3/28/2018 10:48:17 Council Check Summary Page - 1 3/29/2018 - 3/29/2018 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 123,780.43 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 640.00 02600 ARTS AND CULTURE FUND 51.07 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 3,609.87 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 960.92 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 26,577.40 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,887.03 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,193.79 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 22,112.91 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 16,096.42 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 563.80 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 1,236.75 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 322.13 05800 LIQUOR FUND 174,122.40 05900 UTILITY FUND 148,831.19 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,992.30 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 441,613.20 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,125.28 07500 MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 20,464.18 09210 HRAADMINISTRATION 53.87 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,022,712.77 09900 PAYROLL FUND 12,620.28 Report Totals 2,026,567.99 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page- 1 Business Unit 6243 4/5/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 147.18 456745 2219945 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 135.30 457119 2221136 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 282.48 6244 4/5/2018 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 1,175.00 456839 23270354.00-236 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 1,175.00 6245 4/5/2018 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 946.99 RENTAL SKATES 456933 1012589 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 946.99 6246 4/5/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,590.60 457117 63498900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 431.82 456970 63499000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 391.75 457120 63507000 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21.64 456955 97328500 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 2,435.81 6247 4/5/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 208.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 457076 137661 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 30.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES 456934 137791 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 239.08 6248 4/5/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 140.91 PAPER, ETC. 457074 WO-370162-1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 140.91 6249 4/5/2018 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 2,884.47 REPLACEMENT SCANNER 456709 60675 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 64.93- IT SUPPLIES 445325 KQR5654 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 912.04 456911 MFH2831 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 57.22 SCANNER PARTS 457047 MFN9440 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,788.80 6250 4/5/2018 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 409.03 457183 6992 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 409.03 6251 4/5/2018 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 — 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page- 2 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6251 4/5/2018 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. Continued... 1,224.00- 455771 7070248285 4090.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,224.00 50TH AND FRANCE MAINTENANCE 457177 7070249361 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,450.00 CITY HALL CLEANING 457176 7070249594 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,450.00 6252 4/5/2018 104020 DALCO 171.65 KAIVAC CLEANING SOLUTION 456762 3297342 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,030.61 CLEAN SUPPLIES UTLEY 456940 3298831 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,202.26 6253 4/5/2018 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 144.00 CARMEL CORN 456763 2393 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 144.00 6254 4/5/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 41.65 CARIBOU PH NOTICE 456803 581347 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 47.60 COMP PLAN AMEND PH 456806 791742 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 89.25 6255 4/5/2018 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 1,994.18 E-83 REPAIRS 456880 98776 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,994.18 6256 4/5/2018 129508 IMPACT 572.23 457001 131615 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 572.23 6257 4/5/2018 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 1,150.00 FIREFIGHTING FOAM 457075 246682 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,150.00 6258 4/5/2018 129635 JESSE JAMES CREATIVE INC. 1,200.00 EDINET SEARCH HOSTING 456946 JJ5965 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 712.50 EDINA EXTRAS WEBSITE HOSTING 457003 JJ5966 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 712.50 SOFTWARE UPGRADE ON WEB 457003 JJ5966 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 2,625.00 6259 4/5/2018 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 74.50 PORTABLES 456757 129077 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page - 3 Business Unit 6259 4/5/2018 6260 4/5/2018 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID Continued... 63.00 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE - HOLSTER 456813 118485 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 63.00 6261 4/5/2018 100858 LOGIS 721.00 456989 45049 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,734.00 456989 45049 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,961.00 456989 45049 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 4,502.00 456989 45049 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,045.00 456989 45049 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 6,961.00 456989 45049 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 7,269.00 456989 45049 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 7,027.00 456989 45049 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 2,820.00 IPT PROJECT - NETWORK PREP 457046 46018 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 270.00 800 MHZ FIBER MEETING 457046 46018 2310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES E911 180.00 IPT PROJECT- NETWORK PREP 457046 46018 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 420.00 WATCHGUARD PROJECT IT CONSULT 457046 46018 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 360.00 GLEASON TOWER SWITCH INSTALL 457046 46018 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 40,270.00 6262 4/5/2018 103944 MED COMPASS 792.00 ANNUAL MEDICAL EXAMS 456876 33177 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 792.00 6263 4/5/2018 101483 MENARDS 79.54 FOLDING SAWHORSE 457051 064685 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 7.97 CAULKING 457053 064804 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 81.13 SUPPLIES 456992 60457 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.40 WATER IN REVOLVING DOOR 456737 64756 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 80.75 SHELF AND BRACKET 457052 64789 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 83.85 PLAUMBING SNAKE 456741 64820 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 55.87 GENERAL SUPPLIES 457089 65037 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 407.51 6264 4/5/2018 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 661.23 CLEANING SUPPLIES 457161 40601 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 661.23 6265 4/5/2018 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 4/5/2018 - Doc No Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6265 4/5/2018 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. Continued... 8,004.30 GROW IN AERATOR 457124 1157316-00 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 19.50 SUPPLIES 456748 1157731-00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8,023.80 6266 4/5/2018 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 246.29 PAPER TOWELS, TISSUE 456759 14014 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 407.67 LINERS, FOAMY CLEANER, GLOVES 456759 14014 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 284.43 COLD CUPS 456758 14016 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 220.65 NAPKINS 456768 14066 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 157.25 PAPER TOWELS, TISSUE 456769 14070 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 484.93 LINERS, FOAMY CLEANER, GLOVES 456769 14070 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 538.28 BATHROOM/CLEANING SUPPLIES 456738 14075 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 28.33 BATHROOM/CLEANING SUPPLIES 456738 14075 5553.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 2,367.83 6267 4/5/2018 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 513.10 457180 73388 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 513.10 6268 4/5/2018 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 2,364.55 CITY LOGO ENVELOPE SHELLS 456944 99010 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 298.56 CITY HALL ENVELOPES 456945 99201 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 57.62 PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 457064 99390 1140.6575 PRINTING PLANNING 2,720.73 6269 4/5/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 1,898.45 PIPE/MAT FOR HUMID INSTALL 456939 S3578797.001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 39.21 WTP6 FILTER PARTS 457088 S3579860.001 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 1,937.66 6270 4/5/2018 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 26.87- CREDIT MEMO 457030 EC06456 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.04 BELTS 456922 E105255 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.07 CYLINDER 456923 E105290 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 241.74 SUPPLIES 456995 E105306 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 345.98 6271 4/5/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 117.00 457111 020353 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 117.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 - Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6271 4/5/2018 6272 4/5/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION Continued... 463.39 CONCESSIONS FOOD 456735 51314253 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 463.39 6273 4/5/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,157.56 457095 65943 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 390.30 456807 66603 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 294.30 456835 66604 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,842.16 423378 4/5/2018 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 408.75 457112 E-5800 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 136.50 456952 E-5801 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 545.25 423379 4/5/2018 138555 ACCELA INC. 4,787.75 ACCELA MOBILE APP 457069 INV-ACC38769 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 401.25 CITYWORKS-APP INTEGRATION 457069 INV-ACC38769 5925.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 401.75 CITYWORKS-APP INTEGRATION 457069 INV-ACC38769 5924.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 401.25 CITYWORKS-APP INTEGRATION 457069 INV-ACC38769 5960.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 5,992.00 423380 4/5/2018 133140 ACROSS THE STREET PRODUCTIONS INC. 1,700.00 TRAINING 456882 12-5955 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,700.00 423381 4/5/2018 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 450.00- RETURNED MERCHANDISE 456852 300165666 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 102.21 MERCHANDISE 456871 905430578 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 350.16 MERCHANDISE 456870 905437052 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 948.18 MERCHANDISE 456986 905444680 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 529.80 MERCHANDISE 456866 905444922 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,480.35 423382 4/5/2018 105571 ADVANTAGE PAPER 132.00 COFFEE SUPPLIES 456991 447970 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 132.00 423383 4/5/2018 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 - Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423383 4/5/2018 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS Continued... 292.00 FEB ALERUS INVOICE 456917 C63544 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 292.00 423384 4/5/2018 141829 ALL TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS 415.00 456826 SIN000315 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 8,005.00 456936 SIN000333 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 8,420.00 423385 4/5/2018 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 197.85 CARIBOU COFFEE 456767 70515 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 197.85 423386 4/5/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 352.58 2 WINTHER SWINGCARDS 456772 177D-QNDV-7QC7 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8.07 FILTER 457034 177D-QNDV-KC4C 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 79.98 RETRACTABLE BELTS 456760 1HYF-N1MT-3YFD 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 50.72 SPRAY NOZZLE 456932 1JV7-YNR4-K936 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 8.49 HOOKS 457135 1R3Q-H4YY-KNKX 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 41.98 JUMP DRIVES 456990 IVDP-7DVVD-1J3P 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 29.46 BUILDING - ELECTRICAL PARTS 457054 IVDP-7DWD-3JMJ 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 24.20 ST. 2 TV BRACKET 457077 1VR7-FDTR-3MGQ 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 13.99 FILTER 456931 1XF3-1CVP-DLVVV 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 63.94 PRINCESS BALL & SUPERHERO EVNT 457070 1XF3-1CVP-FMLG 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 673.41 423387 4/5/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 193.29 LAUNDRY 456877 1004089150 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 140.21 LAUNDRY 456878 1004090832 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 123.82 LAUNDRY 457055 1004095197 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 457.32 423388 4/5/2018 141414 AMF SOUTHTOWN 60.00 EDINA YOUTH BOWLING (AR&LE) 456727 1828973 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 70.00 EDINA YOUTH BOWLING (AR&LE) 456726 1828974 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 130.00 423389 4/5/2018 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 205.38 COPY PAPER 457142 10547725-00 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 205.38 R55 CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page- 7 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423390 4/5/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 24.00 456739 0413118 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,289.00 456954 3249392 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,131.00 456744 3249393 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 819.90 456969 3250883 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,827.50 457159 3250884 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 26.28- 456950 416924 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,065.12 423391 4/5/2018 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 182.93 RUBBISH REMOVAL 457179 1-146354-4/18 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 182.93 423392 4/5/2018 119206 AZTECA SYSTEMS INC. 200.00 456819 13734 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 300.00 456819 13734 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 200.00 456819 13734 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 700.00 423393 4/5/2018 142186 BAYCOM 4,565.00 TOUGHBOOKS FOR STREETS 457188 EQUIPINV_013015 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 4,565.00 TOUGHBOOKS FOR STREETS 457188 EQUIPINV_013015 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 9,130.00 423394 4/5/2018 140485 BERGAN KDV 5,500.00 OUTSOURCED AUDIT WORK 457086 990335 1160.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE 5,500.00 423395 4/5/2018 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 390.00 PIZZA 456766 4744225 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 234.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 456734 D8511057 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 624.00 423396 4/5/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 1,363.20 457116 415248 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.00 456834 416524 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 526.33 456842 416525 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 473.85 456909 416631 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,383.38 423397 4/5/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 - Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423397 4/5/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. Continued... 630.00 457110 2065 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 630.00 456743 2066 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 282.00 456742 2114 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,542.00 423398 4/5/2018 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 19,950.00 PAVER REPLACEMENT 457091 1737-1 PAVER 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT 19,950.00 423399 4/5/2018 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 1,100.00 SOUTH RAMP REPAIR 457158 1705-1 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,100.00 423400 4/5/2018 136855 BOBER, SARAH 150.00 REIMBURSEMENT- JEWELRY SUPPLI 457059 033018 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 150.00 423401 4/5/2018 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 267.91 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 456893 82817077 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 267.91 423402 4/5/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 3,448.50 457102 149499 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 606.86 456710 149608 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,052.50 456832 149638 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,813.00 457099 149751 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10,920.86 423403 4/5/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 4,247.75 456789 1080768913 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,207.11 456788 1080768934 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 73.15 457094 1080775248 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,859.28 457103 1080775250 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 71.11 457092 1080775251 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,855.34 456781 1080778404 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,296.82 456783 1080778405 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 75.75 456782 1080778406 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 605.75 456780 1080778407 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 695.17 456798 1080778408 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page- 9 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423403 4/5/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 431.63 456799 1080778409 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 605.75 456785 1080778410 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,818.48 456820 1080778411 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 234.30 456822 1080778412 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,010.08 456843 1080778413 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 472.55 456844 1080778474 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 605.75 456824 1080778475 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27,165.77 423404 4/5/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 4,133.25 457151 1090834680 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 162.95 456747 1090837766 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,612.25 456747 1090837766 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,009.75 4567.13 1090837767 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.65 456714 1090837768 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,565.25 457113 1090837769 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.65 457105 1090837770 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12,636.75 423405 4/5/2018 122250 BROWN, JEFF 330.27 JB MILEAGE 457039 032918 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 330.27 423406 4/5/2018 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 133.50 MERCHANDISE 457136 928783032 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,973.21 MERCHANDISE 456863 928808242 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 176.00 MERCHANDISE 456849 928808245 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 107.95 MERCHANDISE 456865 928813876 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 804.48 MERCHANDISE 456864 928827595 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 283.50 MERCHANDISE 456850 928829821 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 154.70 MERCHANDISE 456848 928829822 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 144.50 MERCHANIDSE 456899 928829823 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 650.72 MERCHANDISE 456896 928857528 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 148.75 MERCHANDISE 456897 928860339 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 280.80 MERCHANDISE 456898 928860340 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 151.85 MERCHANDISE 456851 928867662 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5,009.96 423407 4/5/2018 142195 CALUMET BRANDED PRODUCTS, LLC 3,640.00 FUEL FOR SMALL FIRE EQUIPMENT 456938 90201442 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 - Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423407 4/5/2018 142195 CALUMET BRANDED PRODUCTS, LLC Continued... 3,640.00 423408 4/5/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,399.35 457160 2083304 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 339.85 456716 2083803 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.60 456773 2083807 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,104.50 456773 2083807 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9.60- 456775 2083809 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.60- 456845 591-0133 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,906.10 423409 4/5/2018 129923 CAWLEY COMPANY, THE 13.33 NAME TAG - J. HALES 456947 V525699 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 13.33 NAME TAG - P. WATERLOO 456947 V525699 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 26.66 423410 4/5/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 95.21 457018 10089900-3/18 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13,192.12 457027 10437426-3/18 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 2,327.38 457016 5546504-3/18 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,193.41 457017 5563827-3/18 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 89.18 457014 5566163-3/18 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 4,486.27 457021 5591458-3/18 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 115.16 457015 5596524-3/18 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 10,679.87 457026 6204072-3/18 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,958.12 457020 8034001-3/18 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 95.94 PW GAS 457166 9546705-3/18 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,105.13 457019 9724639-3/18 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 42,337.79 423411 4/5/2018 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 150.00 TRAINING 456881 00668252 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 423412 4/5/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 134.63 457011 0024-3/18 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 58.05 457082 0297-3/18 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 55.97 457008 1565-3/18 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.32 457010 1586-3/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 85.33 457009 2444-3/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page- 11 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423412 4/5/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 60.32 457182 8632-3/19 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 450.31 457081 8861-3/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 904.93 423413 4/5/2018 135835 CENTURYLINK-ACCESS BILL 1,514.00 457012 5142XLP683-2018 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 067 1,514.00 423414 4/5/2018 101264 CHET'S SAFEY SALES INC. 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS 2018 456823 S16085 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 200.00 SAFETY BOOTS 2018 456823 S16085 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 329.99 SAFETY BOOTS 2018 456823 S16085 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 365.29 SAFETY BOOTS 2018 456823 S16085 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,653.21 SAFETY BOOTS 2018 456823 S16085 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,507.96 SAFETY BOOTS 2018 456823 S16085 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 4,206.45 423415 4/5/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 15.00 SHOP TOWELS 456895 4004673525 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 36.26 LAUNDRY 456729 4004694908 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 14.44 UNIFORM RENTAL 456731 4004694910 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 37.84 UNIFORM RENTAL 456732 4004694957 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.72 UNIFORM RENTAL 456728 4004694962 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19.92 UNIFORM RENTAL 456730 4004694973 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 170.18 423416 4/5/2018 102123 CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES, THE 667.06 MERCHANDISE 456867 64615 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 485.73 MERCHANDISE 456869 64646 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,152.79 423417 4/5/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 2,172.58 456770 0113317143-4/12 5720.6189 SEWER & WATER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4,560.16 WATER 456908 0155200000-3/18 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 2.64 WATER 456906 0155250009-3/18 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 110.47 WATER 456907 0155250018-3/18 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 62.16 WATER 456904 0173001000-3/18 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 113.78 WATER 456905 0173001001-3/18 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 7,021.79 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 — Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423417 4/5/2018 423418 4/5/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC. Continued... 396.20 3/4" CONCRETE PINS 457062 0062301500 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 396.20 423419 4/5/2018 101495 CREATIVE IMAGES ON RIBBON INC. 693.83 SKATE SCHOOL RIBBONS 457068 9974 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 693.83 423420 4/5/2018 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 6,907.78 POPCORN BAGS 456736 59284 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 6,907.78 423421 4/5/2018 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 1,006.00 APRIL NEWSLETTER 456786 314358 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,006.00 423422 4/5/2018 142190 DAKOTA PROPERTIES 30.22 REFUND 456704 123031 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 30.22 423423 4/5/2018 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,893.65 APRIL STD INVOICE 456916 F018342-03/18 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,893.65 423424 4/5/2018 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 52.58 BATTERY MAINT. KIT 457028 45739 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.58 423425 4/5/2018 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 9,932.50 PENTAGON PARK - HILLCREST 456720 3403850 9240.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT 4,858.00 PENTAGON PARK - CHASE 456721 3403853 9210.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL HRAADMINISTRATION 7,710.50 PENTAGON NORTH ESCROW 456975 3409538 9210.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL HRAADMINISTRATION 22,501.00 423426 4/5/2018 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 690.00 PENTAGON NORTH - CHASE 456719 76203 9210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER HRAADMINISTRATION 1,840.00 4040 W 70TH ST APTS 456718 76231 9210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER HRAADMINISTRATION 1,897.50 GR GREEN FINANCIAL CONSULTANT 456971 76373 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 632.50 SOUTHDALE 2/4040 W.70TH 456973 76405 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page - 13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423426 4/5/2018 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. Continued... 1,552.50 5146 EDEN SITE 456972 76406 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,840.00 PENTAGON NO PREP ESCROW 456974 76408 9210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER HRAADMINISTRATION 8,452.50 423427 4/5/2018 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 625.00 REPAIRS SEVERAL SQUADS 456815 MOB18022 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 625.00 423428 4/5/2018 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 231.53 457109 8725 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 231.53 423429 4/5/2018 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 360.00 EXPLORER UNIFORMS 456722 20180328NF 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 360.00 423430 4/5/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 11.86 FILTER 456921 1-5533522 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.48 LUBRICANT 456925 69-305204 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.99 TPMS SENSOR 457031 69-305229 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.99 TPMS SENSOR 457029 75-295400 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 158.32 423431 4/5/2018 130136 FAUS, SUSAN 103.26 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 457057 033018 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 103.26 423432 4/5/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 3,390.00 FLUSHING DIFFUSERS 456804 0275456 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 24.74 METER PARTS 457050 0275940 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 911.34 HYDRANT FLUSHING ADAPTER 457049 275161 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 4,326.08 423433 4/5/2018 142209 FREENOTES HARMONY PARK 7,558.95 INSTR. ROTARY DONATION 457058 033018 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 7,558.95 423434 4/5/2018 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 1,167.23 MERCHANDISE 457137 41465076 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,241.62 MERCHANDISE 457139 41465080 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 4/5/2018 - Doc No Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423434 4/5/2018 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS Continued... 1,344.04 MERCHANDISE 457138 41465081 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,607.16 MERCHANDISE 456874 5981801 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5,360.05 423435 4/5/2018 132603 GOLFNOW G1 LLC 2,500.00 GOLFNOW POS SOFTWARE 456868 5100150019 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,500.00 423436 4/5/2018 101103 GRAINGER 44.36 COMBO LOCK PD EXERCISE ROOM 456707 9735604515 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.65 BROOM 457143 9736073405 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 57.04 KNEELING PADS, CARTS 456956 9739343185 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 373.10 CARTS FOR HYDRANT ADAPTERS 456956 9739343185 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 85.26 TOOL BOXES 457184 9744395170 5915.6556 TOOLS WATER TREATMENT 615.41 423437 4/5/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 487.25 456831 37224 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 245.75 456837 MN00037221 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 345.25 456840 MN00037222 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 427.50 456829 MN00037223 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 246.25 456810 MN00037239 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 323.50 456811 MN00037240 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,075.50 423438 4/5/2018 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 739.43 MERCHANDISE 456875 62348 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 739.43 423439 4/5/2018 142214 GRIEP, ALAN 1,139.94 AMB REF 38888155 457087 4022018 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,139.94 423440 4/5/2018 142216 GUNDERSON, WILL 2,400.00 NO. RAMP SNOW CHUTE 457165 104 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,400.00 423441 4/5/2018 142191 GUNDVALDSON, JEFFERY 189.87 REFUND 456705 119019 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 189.87 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 — Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423441 423442 4/5/2018 4/5/2018 142191 GUNDVALDSON, JEFFERY 100788 H&L MESABI Continued... 2,390.00 CUTTING EDGES 456825 00619 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,390,00 423443 4/5/2018 100797 HAWKINS INC. 4,317.72 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS 456816 4249938 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,317.72 423444 4/5/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 4,002.50 FEBRUARY BOOKING 457065 1000108913 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 4,002.50 423445 4/5/2018 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 1,499.28 JOHN'S WORKAREA UPGRADE 456999 639824 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 1,499.28 423446 4/5/2018 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 467.38 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 457056 51359488 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 467.38 423447 4/5/2018 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 28.27 BACKPACK VAC HOSE 456761 700318979 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPUES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 28.27 423448 4/5/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,035.00 457115 952624 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 353.50 456711 953903 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 846.00 456861 953904 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 30.00 456858 953905 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 658.00 456751 953906 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,922.50 423449 4/5/2018 112935 HUNZELMAN, RENEE 207.71 REFUND 456700 107961 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 207.71 423450 4/5/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 28.84 FILTER 456985 038039673 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.04 FILTER 456984 038039674 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 4/5/2018 - Doc No Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423450 4/5/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC Continued... 18.82 FILTERS 457032 038039888 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 127.44 FILTERS 457033 038039959 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 186.14 423451 4/5/2018 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 439.12 457013 608623397 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 439.12 423452 4/5/2018 105756 IN THE HEART OF THE BEAST 364.00 ADVERTISING 457071 1587 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER . ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 364.00 423453 4/5/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 252.90 457104 61929 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 400.40 456841 62004 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 541.90 456860 62041 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,195.20 423454 4/5/2018 138240 INTERMEDIX 7,318.09 FEB AMBULANCE 456910 INVADPI25564 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 7,318.09 423455 4/5/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 55.36- 456859 2776551 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18.45- 456712 2776552 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 836.30 456715 2776553 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,932.05 456862 2787541 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 50.15 456830 2787542 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,993.10 456752 2787543 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.55 456754 2787544 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9,763.34 423456 4/5/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.19 457154 5925001 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,614.51 456953 5966580 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 815.30 457147 5971722 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 897.29 456959 5971723 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 81.19 456958 5971724 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 103.19 456960 5971725 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 50.99 456957 5971726 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page - 17 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423456 4/5/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 232.38 457127 5971729 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,820.15 457129 5971730 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 500.76 456988 5971731 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,690.71 456961 5971732 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 457146 5971733 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,109.30 457131 5971735 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 38.19 457145 5971736 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,806.13 457132 5971737 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,046.46 457133 5971738 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,472.79 457130 5971739 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.19 457134 5971740 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,095.52 457126 5971741 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.84- 456791 672044 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22,322.59 423457 4/5/2018 142188 JOHNSON, BARBARA 103.00 REFUND 456702 88253 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 103.00 423458 4/5/2018 142207 KIESLER'S POLICE SUPPLY, INC. 710.80 SWAT SMOKE 457063 856242 1401.6551 AMMUNITION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 710.80 423459 4/5/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 66.77 VINLY CLEANER 456924 9305698462 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.77 423460 4/5/2018 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 20.00 LEAGUE OF MN TRAINING 456717 270161 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 20.00 423461 4/5/2018 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 3,603.35 CIGNA P/F 2018 INVOICE 456913 APRIL2018 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 3,603.35 423462 4/5/2018 142192 LIMPERT, HARLAN 85.69 REFUND 456723 79957 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 85.69 423463 4/5/2018 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 — Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423463 4/5/2018 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. Continued... 1,939.69 LOOP ASY, SHAFT 456821 351502 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,939.69 423464 4/5/2018 133185 LOGAN, PATRICK 19.90 CLEANING SUPPLIES 456948 32918 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 19.90 423465 4/5/2018 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 144.00 456708 11312 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 456951 11312-A 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 630.00 457106 11313 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 414.00 456749 11314 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,332.00 423466 4/5/2018 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 670.00 456812 217256 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 938.00 456805 217338 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,608.00 423467 4/5/2018 142187 MALININ, YURIY 34.53 REFUND 456701 105159 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 34.53 423468 4/5/2018 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 8,432.64 UNLEADED FUEL 457172 744415 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8,247.49 UNLEADED FUEL 457173 744416 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,072.65 UNLEADED FUEL 457171 747195 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17,752.78 423469 4/5/2018 142173 MEDINA ELECTRIC LLC 2,700.00 POLE LIGHT REMOVAL C RAMP 456800 15866 1321.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,700.00 423470 4/5/2018 100883 MESSERLI & KRAMER 1,000.00 GRANDVIEW GREEN LEGAL 457167 349012 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,000.00 423471 4/5/2018 104650 MICRO CENTER 7.98 RCAADAPTERS 456928 7036010 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 7.98 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 — Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423471 4/5/2018 423472 4/5/2018 104650 MICRO CENTER 139880 MID CITY SERVICES - INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY Continued... 44.00 RUG LAUNDERING 457072 73906 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.00 423473 4/5/2018 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,890.00 SL REPLACEMENT 457170 35622 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,890.00 423474 4/5/2018 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 205.76 CRAFT SUPPLIES-CLAY TOOLS 457035 103632 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 375.54 CRAFT SUPPLIES-CLAY , TOOLS 457036 103962 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 581.30 423475 4/5/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 75.00 MN LICENSE 456740 747957-711709 5520.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS 75.00 423476 4/5/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 75.00 MN. DEPT HEALTH. VANVALKENGURG 456753 747958-711726 1646.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 75.00 423477 4/5/2018 131739 MINNESOTA DVS 1,762.95 VEHICLE LICENSE FEES 456981 20180329NM 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,762.95 423478 4/5/2018 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION, INC. 270.00 MGA 2018 DUES 457125 5106287 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 270.00 423479 4/5/2018 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY 243.53 MPCA FEES 457144 10000046292 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 243.53 423480 4/5/2018 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 1,710.00 POST LICENSE RENEWALS 457078 20181751 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,710.00 423481 4/5/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 54.71 GENERAL SUPPLIES-GALLERY CARDS 457038 24583 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 4/5/2018 - Doc No Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423481 4/5/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 135.00 NORTH RAMP PR FLYERS 456903 24762 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 23.55 3 NAMEPLATES - COMMISSIONS 456976 24813 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 49.00 457181 24815 5913.6575 PRINTING DISTRIBUTION 16.00 NORTH RAMP WAYFINDING 456978 24816 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 278.26 423482 4/5/2018 141524 MITCHELL, CHANTE 88.81 UBER - NLC 457185 03-26-2018 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 88.81 423483 4/5/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 182.13 457108 4940 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 182.13 456750 4941 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 175.38 456968 5034 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 539.64 423484 4/5/2018 100916 MOOD MEDIA 292.14 MUSIC SERVICE 456930 53825473 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 292.14 423485 4/5/2018 101796 MPCA 243.53 457178 10000046835 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 243.53 423486 4/5/2018 105595 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 2,461.22 SUPPLIES 456746 1157601-00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 130.93 TOOLS 456993 1157922-00 1641.6556 TOOLS MOWING 2,592.15 423487 4/5/2018 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 70.35- CREDIT MEMO 456918 2122-312596 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 110.40 REPAIR PARTS 457152 3599-969390 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.05 423488. 4/5/2018 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 559.35 CINCY TRIP REIMBURSEMENT 457186 04-02-2018 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 598.60 CINCY TRIP REIMBURSEMENT 457186 04-02-2018 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 1,157.95 423489 4/5/2018 100763 NEOPOST USA INC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page - 21 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423489 4/5/2018 100763 NEOPOST USA INC Continued... 251.67 POSTAGE RENTAL 457048 55649848 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 251.67 423490 4/5/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 145.50 457096 129593 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 843.33 456838 129824 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,775.50 456833 129825 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,262.50 456809 129826 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 327.50 457156 129949 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,354.33 423491 4/5/2018 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 3,444.00 SIGN SHEETING MATERIAL 456935 TRFINV000209 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 3,444.00 423492 4/5/2018 104350 NIKE USA INC. 20.00 MERCHANDISE 456873 9912856934 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 20.00 423493 4/5/2018 142201 NORTHWEST LIGHTING SYSTEMS CO. 171.74 LAMPS-PD SIGN/CTS CANS 457041 106699 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 171.74 423494 4/5/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 83.52 SUPPLIES 456756 615877 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 63.12 CHAINS 457000 616701 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 146.64 423495 4/5/2018 101659 ORKIN 150.40 PEST CONTROL 457043 167720759 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.00 PEST CONTROUPAMELA 457044 167722304 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.00 PEST CONTROUARNESON 457045 167722305 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.40 423496 4/5/2018 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 80.00 WINDOW TINT NEW CAR 457040 308376 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 80.00 423497 4/5/2018 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 504.00 457107 17335 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 - Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423497 4/5/2018 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY Continued... 504.00 423498 4/5/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 455.75 457114 4892 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,303.70 456900 5633 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,959.40 456818 5640 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,554.86 456776 5650 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,273.71 423499 4/5/2018 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 MONTHLY UTILITY FEES 457080 70516148 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 39.95 423500 4/5/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 849.02 CONCESSIONS FOOD 456929 54751665 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 202.94 PEPSI 456949 54751666 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,051.96 423501 4/5/2018 138081 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 81.00 SALT - ST. 1 457162 156901 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.00 423502 4/5/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 995.57 457128 2331780 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,188.76 456964 2331781 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 301.19 456967 2331782 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 472.04 456966 2331783 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,315.04 456965 2331784 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 440.51 457123 2331786 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,951.12 457121 2331787 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,315.04 457122 2331788 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 193.15 457157 2332021 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.17- 456796 289919 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21.00- 457100 289920 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.77- 456792 289921 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00- 457097 289924 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.00- 456793 289925 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.00- 456794 289926 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.67- 456795 289927 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14.54- 457098 289972 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page- 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 — Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423502 4/5/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL Continued... 423503 4/5/2018 8,060.27 108.00 RODENT CONTROL 456771 5882721 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 108.00 423504 4/5/2018 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 25.49 UNIFORM LONG UNDERWEAR 2018 457168 033018M 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 25.49 423505 4/5/2018 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 78.79 LOCKER ROOM PAINT 457066 985102046485 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 78.79 423506 4/5/2018 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 900.00 456836 IN200-1016279 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 900.00 423507 4/5/2018 119507 PUKKA INC. 609.60 MERCHANDISE 457140 BU01275-IN 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 609.60 423508 4/5/2018 142176 RASA TROUP, MS, RD, CSSD, LD 400.00 TRAINING 456879 03152018STMT 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 400.00 423509 4/5/2018 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 288.00 457118 K-35334572 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 288.00 423510 4/5/2018 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 946.92 SOFTENER SALT 457067 356048 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 946.92 423511 4/5/2018 139439 RUE 38 LLC 57.50 456808 2951 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 57.50 423512 4/5/2018 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 659.16 CITY HALL ELEVATOR 457169 8104765416 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/5/2018 — Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423512 4/5/2018 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 100995 SEH Continued... 423513 4/5/2018 659.16 12,789.85 CELL TOWER WORK 457175 347627 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 12,789.85 423514 4/5/2018 130047 SELECT ACCOUNT 904.50 MAR SELECT ACCOUNT INVOICE 456912 1224288 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 904.50 423515 4/5/2018 101106 SERVICEMASTER 1,650.00 RAMP FLOOR CLEAN/REFINISH 456802 60280 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,650.00 423516 4/5/2018 101556 SHRED-IT USA 51.90 SHREDDING SERVICES 456706 8124412748 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 51.90 423517 4/5/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 455.01 NORTH RAMP WAYFINDING 456977 12526 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,643.84 NORTH RAMP WAYFINDING 456902 12774 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,098.85 423518 4/5/2018 142189 SOARES, WALTER 335.20 REFUND 456703 118530 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 335.20 423519 4/5/2018 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 69.91 PAPER TOWELS ETC 457073 206481 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 69.91 423520 4/5/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS .80 457101 1661666 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 44.16 456797 1664366 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,350.41 456790 1664367 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,286.56 456787 1664368 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .13 456828 1664369 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 808.50 456846 1664370 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,151.48 456847 1664371 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,831.20 456827 1664372 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page- 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423520 4/5/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 1,018.77 456755 1664373 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 720.00 456779 1664374 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,034.17 456779 1664374 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,072.80 456777 1664375 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,104.24 456778 1664376 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21,423.22 423521 4/5/2018 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION 12,880.00 Q2 DUES 457090 201657 1132.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CABLE COMMISSION 12,880.00 423522 4/5/2018 129891 SPACK CONSULTING 1,800.00 TRAFFIC STUDY - CARIBOU 456997 5810 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 900.00 TRAFFIC STUDY - HAZELTON APTS. 456998 5811 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 2,700.00 423523 4/5/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 314.20 457093 20531 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 160.00 456784 20692 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 153.00 456901 20693 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 627.20 423524 4/5/2018 142200 STEELE FITNESS 83.84 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 456927 032818 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 400.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 456927 032818 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 483.84 423525 4/5/2018 100136 STERLING CUT GLASS 561.60 MERCHANDISE 456894 0425618 IN 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 561.60 423526 4/5/2018 102786 STOP STICK LTD 493.00 STOP STICKS 456814 0011321-IN 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 493.00 423527 4/5/2018 142210 STRAND-CRAWFORD, LAUREL 120.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 457061 033018 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 120.00 423528 4/5/2018 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 4/5/2018 — Doc No Inv No 4/5/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423528 4/6/2018 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. Continued... 596.56 TIRES 456920 10152434 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 596.56 423529 4/5/2018 121681 SUMMIT 1,855.00 FIRE SPRINK SYS REPAIR 456801 1250311 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,855.00 423530 4/5/2018 142175 SUN MOUNTAIN UA GOLF SALES 262.20 MERCHANDISE 456856 479224 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 262.20 423531 4/5/2018 137673 SWEETLAND ORCHARD LLC 360.00 456857 2110 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 360.00 423532 4/5/2018 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 771.21 CONCESSION PRODUCT 456764 147748798 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 440.35 CONCESSION PRODUCT 456765 147755216 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 1,211.56 423533 4/5/2018 104932 TAYLOR MADE 600.00 MERCHANDISE 456855 33064974 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 306.08 MERCHANDISE 456854 33065252 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 353.52 MERCHANDISE 456853 33067088 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 117.72 MERCHANDISE 457141 78477 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,377.32 423534 4/5/2018 136342 TRAVISMATHEW LLC 1,280.85 MERCHANDISE 456872 3403451 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,280.85 423535 4/5/2018 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT 1,550.00 456937 P88689 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,550.00 423536 4/5/2018 138581 TRUST IN US LLC 20.00 Q1 RANDOM DOT 456914 77677 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 176.25 Q2 RANDOM DOT PART2 456915 77696 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 196.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page - 27 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423537 4/5/2018 136104 TRYSTAR INC. Continued... 1,044.63 WELL 6 WIRE VFD 456817 137343 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 1,044.63 423538 4/5/2018 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 306.74 TOM S OFFICE MATERIAL 457042 935741 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 306.74 423539 4/5/2018 140382 UNITED FARMERS COOP 47.45 AIR FILTERS 456774 78003 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.45 423540 4/5/2018 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 42.12 457083 STMT 3/18 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 114.32 457083 STMT 3/18 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 126.36 457083 STMT 3/18 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 318.91 457083 STMT 3/18 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 601.71 423541 4/5/2018 139818 US HEALTHWORKS 170.00 457187 0067430 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 170.00 423542 4/5/2018 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 456.00 RPELACEMENT PARTS 456994 530892 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 456.00 423543 4/5/2018 101058 VAN PAPER CO, 492.95 SUPPLIES 456996 458143-00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 151.30 CAN LINERS 457002 458143-01 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 644.25 423544 4/5/2018 141927 VER-TECH LABS 2,539.69 TRUCK WASH SOAP 457174 INV000015079 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,539.69 423545 4/5/2018 142193 VESTA HOMES LLC 44.59 REFUND 456724 122800 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 44.59 423546 4/5/2018 133629 VON HANSOMS MEATS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423546 4/5/2018 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS Continued-. 197.60 CONCESSIONS FOOD 456733 106159 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 197.60 423547 4/5/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 614.58 GARBAGE 456941 0038093-2808-5 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 614.58 GARBAGE 456941 0038093-2808-5 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,600.00 GARBAGE 456941 0038093-2808-5 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,577.34 NW CENTER RAMP GARBAGE 456943 7751684-2282-9 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,980.18 S RAMP GARBAGE 456942 7751686-2282-4 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 6,386.68 423548 4/5/2018 142194 WE CATER TO YOU 1,075.79 BUNNY BREAKFAST 456725 4234 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 1,075.79 423549 4/5/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 106.38 457149 7176784 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,238.71 456962 7176785 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 40.13 456963 7176786 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.94 457148 7176788 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,069.04 457150 7176789 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,475.20 423550 4/5/2018 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,083.00 AUAR 456982 3-R-011179-000 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 8,056.00 VALLEY VIEW SIDEWALK 456926 R-010516-000 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 5,299.50 69TH FRANCE SHARED ENTRANCE 456979 R-010823-000 9232.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 14,438.50 423551 4/5/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 6,895.43 NORTH RAMP EXP-TEMP PWR 457079 583987014 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 24.79 457024 584431636 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 51.20 457004 584446010 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 41.77 457025 584468096 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 129.31 457023 584494945 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.81 457022 584510425 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 54.77 457005 584988708 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 95.26 457006 585345387 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 14.17 457007 585417620 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,280.74 457085 585622340 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/5/2018 — 4/5/2018 4/4/2018 10:36:36 Page - 29 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423551 4/5/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 8,600.28 457084 586068299 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 18,202.53 423552 4/5/2018 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 125.00 DOOR JAM 456919 17765 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125.00 423553 4/5/2018 101531 ZINN, JUDY 113.18 REIMBURSEMENT- JEWELRY SUPPLI 457060 033018 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 113.18 588,311.33 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 508,066.42 80,244.91 588,311.33 CITY OF EDINA 4/4/2018 10:36:42 Council Check Summary Page - 1 4/5/2018 - 4/5/2018 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 213,144.31 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,784.00 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 8,056.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 30,647.37 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 680.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,412.65 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 6,585.68 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 89.18 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 33,960.01 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 15,685.63 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 13,238.85 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 19,733.46 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,311.91 05800 LIQUOR FUND 157,648.41 05900 UTILITY FUND 26,415.56 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,185.28 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 3,603.35 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 437.75 09210 HRAADMINISTRATION 16,938.50 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 21,294.78 09238 SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 632.50 09240 PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT 9,932.50 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,893.65 Report Totals 588,311.33 Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Dave Goergen, Public Works Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Well #7 Rehabilitation Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to award quote to E.H. Renner and Sons, Inc. INTRODUCTION: See attached Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report For Well #7 Rehabilatation Date: April, 17, 2018 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Brian E. Olson, Director of Public Works Subject: Well #7 Pump Rehabilitation M List Quote/Bid The Purchase FAWithin Budget Subject to: D State Contract Recommended OService Contract Bid is: 0 Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: March 20, 2018 May 20,2018 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: E.H. Renner and Sons, Inc. $44,200.00 Keys Well Drilling Co. $46,725.00 Bergerson — Caswell, Inc. Refused to quote Recommended Quote or Bid: E.H. Renner and Sons, Inc. Quotes are based on estimated quantities and staff does not expect total costs to exceed $80,000.00. City of Edina . 4801 W. 50th St. . Edina, MN 55424 Request for .irchase Budget Impact 0111111.11 • Funding Source — Utility Fund: Water CIP • Repair/Replacement • Negligible cost of disposal Enviro , 1 ental Impact • . • Energy — Improved efficiency of repaired/replaced equipment has a lower electrical demand • Water — n/a • Material Waste —n/a • Natural Resources — n/a • Carbon — n/a • Certification(s) — n/a Community Impact • Well #7 is a primary well which pumps to Water Treatment Plant (WTP) #6, providing filtered system water for central Edina. It has pumped over one billion gallons of water since its last service Department Director Authorization: City Council Authorization Date: (for purchases over $20,000 only) Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operations Supervisor Item Activity: Subject:Request For Purchase: 2018 Ford F150 with Ecoboost Engine Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize purchase of a 2018 Ford F150 pickup with Ecoboost engine to replace 70-287, a 2005 Chevy 1500 pickup with 122,221 miles and 8,621 engine hours. INTRODUCTION: Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs, and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are, 23 for all sedans and light trucks and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating (GVWR) exceeds 10,500. T he higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a heavy duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 28. T his piece of equipment has a score of 30. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase 2018 Ford F150 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: 04/17/2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operation Supervisor Subject: Purchase of a 2018 Ford F150 with Ecoboost engine Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☒State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Midway Ford Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: 03/30/2018 06/02/2018 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Midway Ford 2777 N Snelling Ave Roseville MN 55113 State Contract #74464 $27,369.92 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact • This funding source is allocated in our Utility equipment replacement program. The truck is replacing a 2005 Chevy 1500 pickup(70-287) with 122,221 miles. The new truck will be serviced by our Fleet Maintenance Operation Division, and utilized by the Utility Division within the Public Works Department. Environmental Impact • This 2018 Ford F150 with Ecoboost engine will be replacing a 2005 Chevrolet 1500 pickup (70-287). This Ford F150 with Ecoboost engine has estimated 21 MPG with a carbon footprint of 14,192 pounds in its lifetime use of 12 years. The vehicle it will replace the 2005 Chevy 1500 that had an EPG of 18 MPG and a carbon foot print of 16,557 pounds. The 2005 Chevy 1500 pickup is a Tier 2 Phase 2 of Government CO2 emissions reductions were the 2018 Ford f150 is Tier 2 phase 3 of government reductions for CO2. Community Impact • This new truck will be utilized in Public works Utilities Division of the Public Works Department to preform locating of water and sewer lines and well as helping with cleaning and vacuuming of the sanitary sewer lines. Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Resolution No. 2018-33: Moving the Polling Place for Edina Precinct 15 to St. Patrick's Catholic Church Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-33. INTRODUCTION: Planned construction by Edina P ublic Schools will hinder their ability to provide Valley View Middle School as a polling place for Edina P recinct 15 for the August Primary Election. State law requires that the same location be used for both the Primary and General Elections in the election cycle. The Church of St. Patrick has graciously allowed us use of their location for 2018. In order to accomplish this move, the Council must adopt the attached resolution. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-33 Moving Polling Location Pct 15 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-33 CHANGING LOCATION FOR EDINA PRECINCT 15 Whereas Minnesota Statute 204B.16 Subdivision 1, authorized the governing body of each municipality to designate a polling place for each election precinct; and Whereas, the normal polling location for Edina Precinct 15 will be under construction during the 2018 Primary Election; and Whereas, Minnesota Statutes require the same polling location to be used for both the Primary and General Election during any State General Election cycle. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the polling location for Edina Precinct 15 shall be the Church of St. Patrick located at 6820 St. Patricks Lane, Edina, Minnesota. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City Council of the City of Edina hereby establishes the following polling locations: Precinct 1A Shepherd of Hills Church 500 Blake Road Precinct 1B Chapel Hills Church 6512 Vernon Avenue Precinct 2 Edina Senior Center 5280 Grandview Square Precinct 3 Mercy Commons Covenant Church 4201 West 50th Street Precinct 4 Weber Park Building 4115 Grimes Avenue Precinct 5 Good Samaritan Church 5730 Grove Street Precinct 6 Countryside Elementary School 5701 Benton Avenue Precinct 7 Normandale Lutheran Church 6100 Normandale Road Precinct 8 South View Middle School 4725 South View Lane Precinct 9 Concord Elementary School 5900 Concord Avenue Precinct 10 St. Albans Church 6716 Gleason Road Precinct 11 New Cities Covenant Church 6400 Tracy Avenue Precinct 12 Arneson Acres Park 471 West 70th Street Precinct 13 Centennial Lake Park Centrum 7499 France Avenue Precinct 14 Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West 54th Street Precinct 15 Church of St. Patrick 6820 St. Patricks Lane Precinct 16 Cornelia Elementary School 7000 Cornelia Drive Precinct 17 Southdale Hennepin Library 7001 York Avenue South Precinct 18 Edinborough Park Great Hall 7700 York Avenue South Precinct 19 Calvary Lutheran Church 6817 Antrim Road Dated: April 17, 2018 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-34: Accepting Livable Communities Demonstration Grant Account Number SG-08939 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion approving Resolution No. 2018-34 accepting the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Grant #SG-08939 in the amount of $1,300,000.00. INTRODUCTION: The City was notified in January 2018 that we were the recipient of the Livable Communities Demonstration Account Grant #SG-08939 in the amount of $1,300,000.00. The City should formally accept the grant. Staff has prepared the attached resolution accepting the grant. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-34 LCDA Grant Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 2018-34 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITY ACT GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina, on behalf of Southdale Office Partners, LLC, has applied for and received a grant under the Metropolitan Livable Community Act in the amount of $1,300,000.00 to redevelop portions of a 22-acre office park into a mix of retail, office and residential uses. A primary feature is extensive stormwater management on-site and a pedestrian-oriented spine through the middle of the site as a promenade type space while relocating a majority of the parking to underground structures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Edina City Council hereby accepts Grant No. SG- 08939 and authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its behalf. Passed and adopted this 17th day of April, 2018. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, _________________. _______________________________ Edina City Clerk LIVABLE COMMUNITIES J EMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM GRANTEE: City of Edina GRANT NO. SG-08939 PROJECT: The Avenue on France GRANT AMOUNT: $1,300,000 FUNDING CYCLE: 2017 COUNCIL ACTION: January 10, 2018 EXPIRATION DATE: December 31, 2020 METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS GRANT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by the Metropolitan Council ("Council") and the Municipality, County, or Development Authority identified above as "Grantee." WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.251 creates the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, the uses of which fund must be consistent with and promote the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act ("LCA") and the policies of the Council's Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes sections 473.251 and 473.253 establish within the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund a Livable Communities Demonstration Account and require the Council to use the funds in the account to make grants or loans to municipalities participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 or to Counties or Development Authorities to fund the initiatives specified in Minnesota Statutes section 473.25(b) in Participating Municipalities; and WHEREAS, the Grantee is a Municipality participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254, a County, or a Development Authority; and WHEREAS, the Grantee seeks funding in connection with an application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant program funds submitted in response to the Council's notice of availability of grant funds for the "Funding Cycle" identified above and will use the grant funds made available under this Agreement to help fund the "Project" identified in the application; and WHEREAS, the Council awarded Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant program funds to the Grantee subject to any terms, conditions, and clarifications stated in its Council Action, and with the understanding that the Project identified in the application will proceed to completion in a timely manner, all grant funds will be expended prior to the "Expiration Date" identified above and Project construction will have "commenced" before the Expiration Date. NOW THEREFORE, in reliance on the above statements and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the Grantee and the Council agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS 1.01. Definition of Terms. The terms defined in this Section have the meanings given them in this Section unless otherwise provided or indicated by the context. Page 1 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM (a) Commenced For the purposes of Sections 2.08 and 4.03, "commenced" means significant physical improvements have occurred in furtherance of the Project (e.g., a foundation is being constructed or other tangible work on a structure has been initiated). In the absence of significant physical improvements, visible staking, engineering, land surveying, soil testing, cleanup site investigation, or pollution cleanup activities are not evidence of Project commencement for the purposes of this Agreement. (b) Council Action. "Council Action" means the action or decision of the governing body of the Metropolitan Council, on the meeting date identified at Page 1 of this Agreement, by which the Grantee was awarded Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds. (c) County. "County" means Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington Counties. (d) Development Authority. "Development Authority" means a statutory or home rule charter city, a housing and redevelopment authority, an economic development authority, or a port authority in the Metropolitan Area. (e) Metropolitan Area. "Metropolitan Area" means the seven-county metropolitan area as defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121, subdivision 2. (f) Municipality. "Municipality" means a statutory or home rule charter city or town participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254. (g) Participating Municipality. "Participating Municipality" means a statutory or home rule charter city or town which has elected to participate in the Local Housing Incentive Account program and negotiated affordable and life-cycle housing goals for the Municipality pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.254. (h) Project. Unless clearly indicated otherwise by the context of a specific provision in this Agreement, "Project" means the development or redevelopment project identified in the application for Demonstration Account funds for which grant funds were requested that through its design and execution will deliver benefits such as housing, connections, and jobs to the region. Grant-funded activities typically are components of the Project. II. GRANT FUNDS 2.01. Source of Funds. The grant funds made available to the Grantee under this Agreement are from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund. The grant funds are derived from the property tax authorized by Minnesota Statutes section 473.253, subdivision 1 and are not from federal sources. 2.02 Total Grant Amount. The Council will grant to the Grantee the "Grant Amount" identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Grantee understands and agrees that any reduction or termination of Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds made available to the Council may result in a like reduction in the Grant Amount made available to the Grantee. Page 2 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM 2.03. Authorized Use of Grant Funds. The Grant Amount made available to the Grantee under this Agreement shall be used only for the purposes and activities described in the application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds. A Project summary that describes eligible uses of the grant funds as approved by the Council is attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Attachment A. Aerial photography or drawings that identify the specific location(s) within the Project boundaries for which grant funds must be used is attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Attachment B. Grant funds must be used to fund the initiatives specified in Minnesota Statutes section 473.25(b), in a Participating Municipality. 2.04. Ineligible Uses. Grant funds must be used for costs directly associated with the specific proposed Project activities and shall not be used for "soft costs" such as: administrative overhead; travel expenses; legal fees; insurance; bonds; permits, licenses, or authorization fees; costs associated with preparing other grant proposals; operating expenses; planning costs, including comprehensive planning costs; and prorated lease and salary costs. Grant funds may not be used for costs of Project activities that occurred prior to the grant award. A detailed list of ineligible and eligible costs is available from the Council's Livable Communities program office. Grant funds also shall not be used by the Grantee or others to supplant or replace: (a) grant or loan funds obtained for the Project from other sources; or (b) Grantee contributions to the Project, including financial assistance, real property or other resources of the Grantee; or (c) funding or budgetary commitments made by the Grantee or others prior to the Council Action, unless specifically authorized in Attachment A. The Council shall bear no responsibility for cost overruns which may be incurred by the Grantee or others in the implementation or performance of the Project activities. The Grantee agrees to comply with any "business subsidy" requirements of Minnesota Statutes sections 116J.993 to 1161995 that apply to the Grantee's expenditures or uses of the grant funds. 2.05. Loans for Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Projects. If consistent with the application and the Project activities described or identified in Attachments A and B or if requested in writing by the Grantee, the Grantee may structure the grant assistance to the Project as a loan so the Project Owner can take advantage of federal and state low-income housing tax credit programs. The Grantee may use the grant funds as a loan for a low-income housing tax credit project, subject to the terms and conditions stated in Sections 2.03 and 2.04 and the following additional terms and conditions: (a) The Grantee covenants and represents to the Council that the Project is a rental housing project that received or will receive an award of low-income housing tax credits under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the low-income housing tax credit program administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or a program administered by the Minneapolis/Saint Paul Housing Finance Board or another designated housing credit agency that sub-allocates low-income housing tax credits in the Metropolitan Area. (b) The Grantee will execute a loan agreement with the Project Owner. Prior to disbursing any grant funds for the Project, the Grantee will provide to the Council a copy of the loan agreement between the Grantee and the Project Owner. (c) The Grantee will submit annual written reports to the Council that certify: (1) the grant funds continue to be used for the Project for which the grant funds were awarded; and (2) the Project is a "qualified low-income housing project" under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. This annual reporting requirement is in addition to the reporting requirements stated in Section 3.03. Notwithstanding the Expiration Date identified at Page 1 Page 3 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM of this Agreement and referenced in Section 4.01, the Grantee will submit the annual certification reports during the initial "compliance period" and any "extended use period," or until such time as the Council terminates this annual reporting requirement by written notice to the Grantee. (d) The grant funds made available to the Grantee and disbursed to the Project Owner by the Grantee in the form of a loan may be used only for the grant-eligible activities and Project components for which the Grantee was awarded the grant funds. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term "Project Owner" means the current Project Owner and any Project Owner successor(s). (e) Pursuant to Section 2.04, the grant funds made available to the Grantee and disbursed to the Project Owner in the form of a loan shall not be used by the Grantee, the Project Owner, or others to supplant or replace: (1) grant or loan funds obtained for the Project from other sources; or (2) Grantee contributions to the Project, including financial assistance, real property, or other resources of the Grantee; or (3) funding or budgetary commitments made by the Grantee or others prior to the Council Action, unless specifically authorized in Attachment A. The Council will not make the grant funds available to the Grantee in a lump sum payment, but will disburse the grant funds to the Grantee on a reimbursement basis pursuant to Section 2.11. (f) By executing this Agreement, the Grantee: (1) acknowledges that the Council expects the loan will be repaid so the grant funds may be used to help fund other activities consistent with the requirements of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act; (2) covenants, represents, and warrants to the Council that the Grantee's loan to the Project Owner will meet all applicable low-income housing tax credit program requirements under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and the low-income housing tax credit program administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or a program administered by the Minneapolis/Saint Paul Housing Finance Board or another designated housing credit agency that sub-allocates low-income housing tax credits in the Metropolitan Area; and (3) agrees to administer its loan to the Project Owner consistent with federal and state low-income housing tax credit program requirements. (g) The Grantee will, at its own expense, use diligent efforts to recover loan proceeds: (1) when the Project Owner becomes obligated to repay the Grantee's loan or defaults on the Grantee's loan; (2) when the initial thirty-year "compliance period" expires, unless the Council agrees in writing that the Grantee may make the grant funds available as a loan to the Project Owner for an "extended use period"; and (3) if noncompliance with low-income housing tax credit program requirements or some other event triggers the Project Owner's repayment obligations under its loan agreement with the Grantee. The Grantee must repay to the Council all loan repayment amounts the Grantee receives from the Project Owner. The Grantee shall not be obligated to repay the grant funds to the Council except to the extent the Project Owner repays its loan to the Grantee, provided the Grantee has exercised the reasonable degree of diligence and used administrative and legal remedies a reasonable and prudent housing finance agency would use to obtain payment on a loan, taking into consideration (if applicable) the subordinated nature of the loan. At its discretion, the Council may: (1) permit the Grantee to use the loan repayment from the Project Owner to continue supporting affordable housing components of the Project; or (2) require the Grantee to remit the grant funds to the Council. Page 4 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM (h) If the Grantee earns any interest or other income from its loan agreement with the Project Owner, the Grantee will: (1) use the interest earnings or income only for the purposes of implementing the Project activities for which the grant was awarded; or (2) remit the interest earnings or income to the Council. The Grantee is not obligated to earn any interest or other income from its loan agreement with the Project Owner, except to the extent required by any applicable law. 2.06. Revolving Loans. If consistent with the application and the Project summary or if requested in writing by the Grantee, the Grantee may use the grant funds to make deferred loans (loans made without interest or periodic payments), revolving loans (loans made with interest and periodic payments), or otherwise make the grant funds available on a "revolving" basis for the purposes of implementing the Project activities described or identified in Attachments A and B. The Grantee will submit annual written reports to the Council that report on the uses of the grant funds. The Council will determine the form and content of the report. This annual reporting requirement is in addition to the reporting requirements stated in Section 3.03. Notwithstanding the Expiration Date identified at Page 1 of this Agreement and referenced in Section 4.01, the Grantee will submit the annual reports until the deferred or revolving loan programs terminate, or until such time as the Council terminates this annual reporting requirement by written notice to the Grantee. At its discretion, the Council may: (a) permit the Grantee to use loan repayments to continue supporting affordable housing components of the Project; or (b) require the Grantee to remit the grant funds to the Council. 2.07. Restrictions on Loans or Grants to Subrecipients. The Grantee shall not permit any subgrantee or subrecipient to use the grant funds for loans or grants to any subrecipient at any tier unless the Grantee obtains the prior written consent of the Council. The requirements of this Section 2.07 shall be included in all subgrant and subrecipient agreements. 2.08. Project Commencement and Changes. The Project for which grant funds were requested must be "commenced" prior to the Expiration Date. The Grantee must promptly inform the Council in writing of any significant changes to the Project for which the grant funds were awarded, as well as any potential changes to the grant-funded activities described or identified in Attachments A and B. Failure to inform the Council of any significant changes to the Project or significant changes to grant-funded components of the Project, and use of grant funds for ineligible or unauthorized purposes, will jeopardize the Grantee's eligibility for future LCA awards. Grant funds will not be disbursed prior to Council approval of significant changes to either the Project or grant-funded activities described or identified in Attachments A and B. 2.09 Budget Variance. The Grantee may reallocate up to twenty percent (20%) of the Grant Amount among the grant-funded activities, provided: (a) the grant funds may be used only for Project activities for which the Council awarded the grant funds; (b) the reallocation does not significantly change the Project deliverables; and (c) the Grantee receives written permission from Council staff prior to reallocating any grant funds. Council staff may administratively approve budget reallocation requests that exceed twenty percent (20%) of the Grant Amount only if the reallocation does not significantly change the Project deliverables. Notwithstanding the aggregate or net effect of any variances, the Council's obligation to provide grant funds under this Agreement shall not exceed the Grant Amount identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. 2.10. Loss of Grant Funds. The Grantee agrees to remit to the Council in a prompt manner: any unspent grant funds, including any grant funds that are not expended prior to the Expiration Date identified at Page 1 of this Agreement; any grant funds that are not used for the authorized purposes; Page 5 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LINABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM and any interest earnings described in Section 2.12 that are not used for the purposes of implementing the grant-funded Project activities described or identified in Attachments A and B. For the purposes of this Agreement, grant funds are "expended" prior to the Expiration Date if the Grantee pays or is obligated to pay for expenses of eligible grant-funded Project activities that occurred prior to the Expiration Date and the eligible expenses were incurred prior to the Expiration Date. Unspent or unused grant funds and other funds remitted to the Council shall revert to the Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account for distribution through application processes in future Funding Cycles or as otherwise permitted by law. 2.11. Payment Request Forms, Documentation, and Disbursements. The Council will disburse grant funds in response to written payment requests submitted by the Grantee and reviewed and approved by the Council's authorized agent. Written payment requests shall be made using payment request forms, the form and content of which will be determined by the Council. Payment request and other reporting forms will be provided to the Grantee by the Council. Payment requests must include the following documentation: Consultant/contractor invoices showing the time period covered by the invoice; the specific grant-funded Project activities conducted or completed during the authorized time period within which eligible costs may be incurred; and documentation supporting expenses including subcontractor and consultant invoices showing unit rates, quantities, and a description of the goods or services provided. Subcontractor markups shall not exceed ten percent (10%). The Council will disburse grant funds on a reimbursement basis or a "cost incurred" basis. The Grantee must provide with its written payment requests documentation that shows grant-funded Project activities actually have been completed. Subject to verification of each payment request form (and the required documentation) and approval for consistency with this Agreement, the Council will disburse a requested amount to the Grantee within two (2) weeks after receipt of a properly completed and verified payment request form. 2.12. Interest Earnings. If the Grantee earns any interest or other income from the grant funds received from the Council under this Agreement, the Grantee will use the interest earnings or income only for the purposes of implementing the Project activities described or identified in Attachments A and B. 2.13. Effect of Grant. Issuance of this Grant neither implies any Council responsibility for contamination, if any, at the Project site nor imposes any obligation on the Council to participate in any pollution cleanup of the Project site if such cleanup is undertaken or required. 2.14. Affordability Term. The Grantee shall, through written instruments or otherwise, ensure any affordable units acquired or developed with grant funds made available under this Agreement will remain affordable for a minimum period of fifteen (15) years. The Grantee's obligation under this Section may be satisfied if other Project funding sources (e.g., the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency or the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD")) or state or federal laws (e.g., low-income housing tax credit programs) require an affordability term of at least fifteen (15) years. For the purposes of this Section, "affordable housing unit" means a unit that is affordable to households at eighty percent (80%) or less of the Area Median Income ("AMI"), as established by HUD, unless the Grantee's application stated an affordability standard lower than eighty percent Page 6 of .11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM (80%) of AMI, in which case the Grantee's lower affordability standard shall apply. The affordability requirements of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 2.15. Affirmative Fair Housing Marketing Plans. The Grantee shall, through written instruments or otherwise, ensure the Project owner (and any subsequent owner(s)) adopts and implements an affirmative fair housing marketing plan for all Project housing units (whether market rate or affordable). For the purposes of this Section, "affirmative fair housing marketing plan" means an affirmative fair housing marketing plan that substantially conforms to affirmative fair housing marketing plans published by HUD. The affirmative fair housing marketing plan requirement under this Section shall continue for the minimum affordability term specified in Section 2.14 and shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 2.16. Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers. If the Project for which grant funds were awarded is a housing project, or includes housing units (whether market rate or affordable), and the Grantee stated in its application that Project housing units would be made available to households participating in the federal Housing Choice Voucher program, the Grantee shall, through written instruments or otherwise, ensure the Project owner (and any subsequent owner(s)) adopts and implements a policy under which the Project owner will not refuse to lease Project units to households or individuals participating in the Housing Choice Voucher program because those households or individuals are Housing Choice Voucher program participants. The Housing Choice Voucher requirement under this section shall continue for the minimum affordability term specified in Section 2.14 and shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. III. ACCOUNTING, AUDIT, AND REPORT REQUIREMENTS 3.01. Accounting and Records. The Grantee agrees to establish and maintain accurate and complete accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all grant funds received from the Council. Notwithstanding the expiration and termination provisions of Sections 4.01 and 4.02, such accounts and records shall be kept and maintained by the Grantee for a period of six (6) years following the completion of the Project activities described or identified in Attachments A and B or six (6) years following the expenditure of the grant funds, whichever occurs earlier. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 3.02. Audits. The above accounts and records of the Grantee shall be audited in the same manner as all other accounts and records of the Grantee are audited and may be audited or inspected on the Grantee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations designated and authorized by the Council at any time, following reasonable notification to the Grantee, for a period of six (6) years following the completion of the Project activities or six (6) years following the expenditure of the grant funds, whichever occurs earlier. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05, subdivision 5, the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the Grantee that are relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the Council and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years. 3.03. Report Requirements. The Grantee will report to the Council on the status of the Project activities described or identified in Attachments A and B and the expenditures of the grant funds. Submission of properly completed payment request forms (with proper documentation) required under Section 2.11 will constitute periodic status reports. The Grantee also must complete and submit to the Council a grant activity closeout report. The closeout report form must be submitted within Page 7 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM 120 days after the expiration or termination of this Agreement, whichever occurs earlier. Within 120 days after the Expiration Date, the Grantee must complete and submit to the Council a certification of expenditures of funds form signed by the Grantee's chief financial officer or finance director. The form and content of the closeout report and the certification form will be determined by the Council. These reporting requirements and the reporting requirements of Sections 2.05 and 2.06 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 3.04. Environmental Site Assessment. The Grantee represents that a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment or other environmental review has been or will be carried out, if such environmental assessment or review is appropriate for the scope and nature of the Project activities funded by this Grant, and that any environmental issues have been or will be adequately addressed. IV. AGREEMENT TERM 4.01. Term. This Agreement is effective upon execution of the Agreement by the Council. Unless terminated pursuant to Section 4.02, this Agreement expires on the "Expiration Date" identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. ALL GRANT FUNDS NOT EXPENDED BY THE GRANTEE PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE SHALL REVERT TO THE COUNCIL. 4.02. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the Council for cause at any time upon fourteen (14) calendar days' written notice to the Grantee. Cause shall mean a material breach of this Agreement and any amendments of this Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated prior to the Expiration Date, the Grantee shall receive payment on a pro rata basis for eligible Project activities described or identified in Attachments A and B that have been completed prior to the termination. Termination of this Agreement does not alter the Council's authority to recover grant funds on the basis of a later audit or other review, and does not alter the Grantee's obligation to return any grant funds due to the Council as a result of later audits or corrections. If the Council determines the Grantee has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the applicable provisions of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, the Council may take any action to protect the Council's interests and may refuse to disburse additional grant funds and may require the Grantee to return all or part of the grant funds already disbursed. 4.03. Amendments and Extension. The Council and the Grantee may amend this Agreement by mutual agreement. Amendments or an extension of this Agreement shall be effective only on the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and the Grantee. If the Grantee needs additional time within which to complete grant-funded activities and commence the Project, the Grantee must submit to the Council AT LEAST NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE, a resolution of the Grantee's governing body requesting the extension and a written extension request. THE EXPIRATION DATE MAY BE EXTENDED, BUT THE PERIOD OF ANY EXTENSION(S) SHALL NOT EXCEED TWO (2) YEARS BEYOND THE ORIGINAL EXPIRATION DATE IDENTIFIED AT PAGE 1 OF THIS AGREEMENT. V. GENERAL PROVISIONS 5.01. Equal Opportunity. The Grantee agrees it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local civil rights commission, disability, sexual orientation, or age and will take affirmative action to insure applicants and employees Page 8 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM are treated equally with respect to all aspects of employment, rates of pay and other forms of compensation, and selection for training. 5.02. Conflict of Interest. The members, officers, and employees of the Grantee shall comply with all applicable state statutory and regulatory conflict of interest laws and provisions. 5.03. Liability. Subject to the limitations provided in Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Grantee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Council and its members, employees, and agents from and against all claims, damages, losses, and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from the conduct or implementation of the Project activities funded by this Grant, except to the extent the claims, damages, losses, and expenses arise from the Council's own negligence. Claims included in this indemnification include, without limitation, any claims asserted pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA), Minnesota Statutes chapter 15B, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended, United States Code, title 42, sections 9601 et seq., and the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) as amended, United States Code, title 42, sections 6901 et seq. This obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation of indemnity which otherwise would exist between the Council and the Grantee. The provisions of this Section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. This indemnification shall not be construed as a waiver on the part of either the Grantee or the Council of any immunities or limits on liability provided by Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, or other applicable state or federal law. 5.04. Acknowledgments and Signage. The Grantee will acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the Council in promotional materials, press releases, reports, and publications relating to the Project. The acknowledgment will contain the following or comparable language: Financing for this project was provided by the Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund Until the Project is completed, the Grantee shall ensure the above acknowledgment language, or alternative language approved by the Council's authorized agent, is included on all signs (if any) located at Project or construction sites that identify Project funding partners or entities providing financial support for the Project. The acknowledgment and signage should refer to the "Metropolitan Council" (not "Met Council" or "Metro Council"). 5.05. Permits, Bonds, and Approvals. The Council assumes no responsibility for obtaining any applicable local, state, or federal licenses, permits, bonds, authorizations, or approvals necessary to perform or complete the Project activities described or identified in Attachments A and B. The Grantee and its developer(s), if any, must comply with all applicable licensing, permitting, bonding, authorization, and approval requirements of federal, state, local governmental, and regulatory agencies, including conservation districts. 5.06. Subgrantees, Contractors, and Subcontractors. The Grantee shall include in any subgrant, contract, or subcontract for Project activities appropriate provisions to ensure subgrantee, contractor, and subcontractor compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and this Agreement. Along with such provisions, the Grantee shall require that contractors and subcontractors performing work covered by this Grant comply with all applicable state and federal Occupational Safety and Health Page 9 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM Act regulations. If the Project for which the grant funds were awarded includes affordable units, the Grantee's subgrant agreement(s) shall expressly include the affordability and affirmative fair housing marketing plan requirements of Sections 2.14 and 2.15. 5.07. Stormwater Discharge and Water Management Plan Requirements. If any grant funds are used for urban site redevelopment, the Grantee shall at such redevelopment site meet or require to be met all applicable requirements of: (a) Federal and state laws relating to stormwater discharges including, without limitation, any applicable requirements of Code of Federal Regulations, title 40, parts 122 and 123; and (b) The Council's 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan and the local water management plan for the jurisdiction within which the redevelopment site is located. 5.08. Authorized Agent. Payment request forms, written reports, and correspondence submitted to the Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be directed to: Metropolitan Council Attn: LCA Grants Administration 390 Robert Street North Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-1805 5.09. Non-Assignment. Minnesota Statutes section 473.253, subdivision 2 requires the Council to distribute grant funds to eligible "municipalities," metropolitan-area counties, or "development authorities" for projects in municipalities participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account program. Accordingly, this Agreement is not assignable and shall not be assigned by the Grantee. 5.10. Authorization to Reproduce Images. The Grantee certifies that the Grantee: (a) is the owner of any renderings, images, perspectives, sections, diagrams, photographs, or other copyrightable materials (collectively, "copyrightable materials") that are in the Grantee's application or are submitted to the Council as part of the grant application review process or after grant award, or that the Grantee is fully authorized to grant permissions regarding the copyrightable materials; and (b) the copyrightable materials do not infringe upon the copyrights of others. The Grantee agrees the Council has a nonexclusive royalty-free license and all necessary permissions to reproduce and publish the copyrightable materials for noncommercial purposes, including but not limited to press releases, presentations, reports, and on the internet. The Grantee also agrees the Grantee will not hold the Council responsible for the unauthorized use of the copyrightable materials by third parties. 5.11. Warranty of Legal Capacity. The individuals signing this Agreement on behalf of the Grantee and on behalf of the Council represent and warrant on the Grantee's and the Council's behalf respectively that the individuals are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on the Grantee's and the Council's behalf respectively and that this Agreement constitutes the Grantee's and the Council's valid, binding, and enforceable agreements. Page 10 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantee and the Council have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. This Agreement is effective on the date of fmal execution by the Council. CITY OF EDINA METROPOLITAN COUNCIL By: By: Beth Reetz, Director Title: Community Development Division Date: Date: By: Title: Date: Page 11 of 11 Pages The Avenue on France revised 2/12/2018 DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGAM ATTACHMENT A PROJECT SUMMARY This attachment comprises this page and the succeeding page(s) which contain(s) a summary of the Project identified in the application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds submitted in response to the Council's notice of availability of Demonstration Account grant funds for the Funding Cycle identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. The summary reflects the proposed Project for which the Grantee was awarded grant funds by the Council Action, and may reflect changes in Project funding sources, changes in funding amounts, or minor changes in the proposed Project that occurred subsequent to application submission. The application is incorporated into this Agreement by reference and is made a part of this Agreement as follows. If the application or any provision of the application conflicts with or is inconsistent with the Council Action, other provisions of this Agreement, or the Project summary contained in this Attachment A, the terms, descriptions and dollar amounts reflected in the Council Action or contained in this Agreement and the Project summary shall prevail. For the purposes of resolving conflicts or inconsistencies, the order of precedence is: (1) the Council Action; (2) this Agreement; (3) the Project summary; and (4) the grant application. PROJECT SUMMARY Grant # Type: Applicant: Project Name: Project Location: Council District: SG-08939 LCDA Development City of Edina The Avenue on France 6600 France Ave S District 5 — Steve Elkins Project Detail Project Overview The project is the redevelopment of a 22-acre office park area into a mix of retail, office and residential uses. A primary feature is extensive stonnwater management on-site improving the condition of a nearby lake/wetland and creating a pedestrian-oriented spine through the middle of the site as a promenade type space while relocating a majority of the parking to underground structures. Jobs Temporary (construction): 155 Permanent: 908 FTEs (883 Living Wage) Net tax capacity increase $1,532,598 Total housing units 70 Affordable units 14 A 51-60% AMI, 56 Market Rate Anticipated # bedrooms 14 - Studio/1BR; 56 - 2BR Est. total development $92,416,317 Est. private funds leveraged $91,116,317 Est. other public funds $0 Comments/ Demonstration value • Providing this level of stormwater management is wonderful and should make significant improvements to the water quality of nearby lakes. • Impressive transformation of this area, particularly with placing majority of parking underground. • This curbless street design provides a great precedent for placemaking and prioritizing pedestrians. • Appreciate the design moves providing porosity through the site which better connects Southdale area and nearby neighborhoods. Funding Request $1,300,000 TOTAL $200,000 Stormwater Management $748,990 Placemaking — Paths/walkways, flagpoles, enclosures, benches $209,550 Placemaking — Landscaping, irrigation, water features $138,380 Placemaking — Lighting $3,080 Placemaking — Public art dis slays ATTACHMENT B PROJECT LOCATION(S) This attachment comprises this page and the succeeding page(s) which contain aerial photography or drawings that identify the specific location(s) within the Project boundaries for which the Grantee must use the grant funds. The attached photography or drawings also may identify the types of eligible activities for which the grant funds must be used at specific locations within the Project boundaries. I ~— ro ri •o Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Approve Sub-Grant Agreement: Southdale Office Partners, LLC Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the sub-grant agreement. INTRODUCTION: This item pertains to a grant received from the Metropolitan Council regarding the Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA). On January 10, 2018, the City of Edina received a grant through a competitive process. A private developer will construct the project and will be reimbursed through the terms of the grant agreement. This sub-grant agreement establishes the working relationship and responsibilities so that these grant funds can be used to support new investment in Edina. This agreement was prepared by the City Attorney and is recommended to be approved. ATTACHMENTS: Description LCDA Sub-grant Agreement Southdale Partners 196764v1 1 METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM SUB-GRANT AGREEMENT This Sub-Grant Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into on this ______ day of April, 2018, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Sub-Grantor”) and SOUTHDALE PARTNERS MN, LLC AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER OF SOUTHDALE OFFICE PARTNERS, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as the “Sub-Grantee”). RECITALS WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council (hereinafter referred to as the “Grantor”) and the Sub-Grantor have entered into a Livable Communities Demonstration Account Development Grant Agreement, Grant No. SG08939 (hereinafter “Grant Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Sub-Grantee is the fee owner of property at 6600 France Avenue South, Edina (hereinafter referred to as “Project Location”); and WHEREAS, the Sub-Grantor and Sub-Grantee enter into this Sub-Grant Agreement to fund part of the cost of a 22-acre office park area into a mix of retail, office and residential uses. A primary feature is extensive stormwater management on-site improving the condition of a nearby lake/wetland and creating a pedestrian-oriented spine through the middle of the site as a promenade type space while relocating a majority of the parking to underground structures (hereinafter referred to as the “Project”) at the Project Location and to define the obligations and rights of each under this Sub-Grant. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein, Sub- Grantor and Sub-Grantee do hereby agree as follows: 1. GRANT AGREEMENT. The Grant Agreement is incorporated herein by reference. If there are any inconsistencies or conflicts between this Sub-Grant Agreement and the Grant Agreement, the terms of the Grant Agreement shall control. 2. SUB-GRANT. The Sub-Grantor grants to the Sub-Grantee an amount not to exceed One Million Three Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($1,300,000.00) for the Project at the Project Location. 3. PAYMENT. The Sub-Grantor will disburse grant funds in response to written payment requests submitted by the Sub-Grantee and reviewed and approved by the Sub-Grantor’s authorized agent. Sub-Grantor’s obligation to disburse funds to the Sub-Grantee is contingent upon receipt by the Sub-Grantor of the funds from the Grantor. Written payment requests shall be made using payment request forms, the form and content of which will be determined by the Sub-Grantor. Payment request and other reporting forms will be provided to the Sub-Grantee by the Sub-Grantor. The Sub-Grantor will disburse grant funds on a reimbursement basis or a “cost incurred” basis. The Sub-Grantee must provide with its written payment requests documentation that shows grant-funded Project activities have actually been completed. Subject to verification of each payment request form (and its documentation) and approval for consistency with this Sub-Grant Agreement, the Sub-Grantor will disburse a requested amount to the Sub-Grantee within thirty-five (35) days after receipt of a properly completed and verified payment request form. 196764v1 2 4. MISCELLANEOUS. a. Authorized Representatives. The Sub-Grantor’s Authorized Representative is: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330 Attention: Community Development The Sub-Grantee’s Authorized Representative is: Southdale Partners MN, LLC 6800 France Ave. S #555 Edina, MN 55435 Attention: Gerald T. Jokerst, Wildamere Capital Management b. Assignment. Sub-Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Sub-Grant Agreement without the prior consent of the Sub-Grantor and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this Sub-Grant Agreement, or their successors in office. c. Amendments. Any amendment to this Sub-Grant Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or their successors in office. d. Waiver. If the Sub-Grantor fails to enforce any provision of this Sub-Grant Agreement, that failure does not result in a waiver of the right to enforce the same or another provision of the Agreement in the future. e. Liability and Indemnification. Sub-Grantee will indemnify, save, and hold the Sub-Grantor, its agents, and employees, harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney’s fees incurred by the Sub-Grantor arising from the performance of this Sub-Grant Agreement by Sub-Grantee or Sub-Grantee’s agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies Sub-Grantee may have for the Sub-Grantor’s failure to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. Sub-Grantee shall maintain such books and records as will satisfactorily demonstrate to Federal, State, Grantor’s and Sub- Grantor’s Auditors that Sub-Grantee has used the grant funds in accordance with the Grant Agreement and this Sub-Grant Agreement. f. State Audits. Under Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, subd. 5, Sub-Grantee’s books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years from the end of this Sub-Grant Agreement. 196764v1 3 g. Government Data Practices. Sub-Grantee and Sub-Grantor must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by Sub-Grantee under this Agreement, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Sub-Grantee under this Agreement. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either Sub-Grantee or the Sub-Grantor. If Sub-Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this clause, Sub-Grantee must immediately notify the Sub-Grantor. The Sub-Grantor will give Sub-Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. h. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue. Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this Sub-Grant Agreement. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this Sub-Grant Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Hennepin County, Minnesota. i. Termination for Insufficient Funding. The Sub-Grantor may immediately terminate this Sub-Grant Agreement if it does not obtain funding from the Grantor or if funding cannot be continued at a level sufficient to allow for the payment of the cleanup costs. Termination must be by written or fax notice to Sub-Grantee. The Sub-Grantor is not obligated to pay for any costs incurred after notice and effective date of termination. However, Sub-Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for costs incurred up to the date of termination to the extent that funds are available. Dated: , 2018. CITY OF EDINA BY: James Hovland, Mayor AND Scott Neal, City Manager Dated: , 2018. SOUTHDALE PARTNERS MN, LLC AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER OF SOUTHDALE OFFICE PARTNERS, LLC BY: Dennis Doyle, Chief Manager Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution 2018-35: Accepting Contamination Cleanup Grant No. CCGP-17-0033-Z-FY17 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion approving Resolution No. 2018-35 accepting the Contamination Cleanup Grant No. CCGP-17-0033-Z- FY18 from Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development in the amount of $581,063.00. INTRODUCTION: The City was notified that the grant application submitted November 1, 2017 was awarded a Contamination Cleanup grant in the amount of $581,063.00. Work has begun to complete the environmental remediation identified in the application. This resolution formally accepts the grant award in advance of the City submitting reimbursement requests. Staff has prepared the attached resolution accepting the grant. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-35 DEED grant 49.5 France RESOLUTION NO. 2018-35 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONTAMINATION CLEANUP GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina, on behalf of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and Edina Market Street, LLC, has applied for and received a Contamination Cleanup grant from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development in the amount of $581,063.00 to identify and remediate environmental contaminants found at various parcels located at 3925 to 3944 Market Street as described in the Grant Application dated November 1, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Edina City Council hereby accepts Grant No. CCGP17-0033-Z-FY18 and authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its behalf. Passed and adopted this 17th day of April, 2018. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, _________________. _______________________________ Edina City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT SC#: 137701 DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Contamination Cleanup Grant Contract Grant No: CCGP-17-0033-Z-FYlS 49.5 France Project This grant contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through the Department of Employment and Economic Development, Business and Community Development Division, (STATE) and the City of Edina (GRANTEE). Recitals 1.Under Minn. Stat. § 1161.554 the State is empowered to enter into this grant.2.The State is in need of programs to do the following: reduce the potential threat of harmful contaminantsto the public's health and the environment; to create new jobs and increase the tax base; and provide otherpublic benefits by redeveloping polluted and unproductive sites.3.The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grantcontract to the satisfaction of the State. Grant Contract 1 Term of Grant Contract 1.1 Effective date: December 21, .2017. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B. 98, subds. 5 and 7, no payments will be made to the Grantee until this grant contract is fully executed. 1.2 Expiration date: December 31, 2020. 1.3 Survival of Terms. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant contract: 8.Liability; 9. Accounting; 10. Government Data Practices; 12. Publicity and Endorsement;13.Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; 15. Data Disclosure; 16. Reporting; 18. Conflict ofInterest; 19. Minnesota Business Subsidy Law; and 20. State and Federal Environmental Standards. 2 Grantee's Duties 2. l Duties, Deliverables, and Completion Dates. The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will performthe following duties and provide the deliverables as outlined below. (a)Administer these grant funds in accordance with Minn. Stat. §§ 1161.551 -1161.559 and theapplication submitted on November 1, 2018 for funding for the 49.5 France Project, which isincorporated into this grant agreement and the provisions of this grant agreement. Anymodification made to the approved application must be approved by the State. 1 of 10 Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-37: Amending Parking Time Limits in City Owned Parking Facilities Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-37. INTRODUCTION: With the ongoing construction of the municipal parking ramps, it is necessary to temporarily reduce the allowable time limit so that parking stalls can be available for more customers. The 5-hour limit stalls in the South and North Ramps are recommended to be reduced to 3-hours. This reduction will be in effect Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to 4:00 P M. T his change will be reevaluated in Fall 2018 when the North Ramp is fully restored to use. This strategy was developed in consultation with business owners at 50th & France. T hese new regulations will still allow patrons to enjoy a longer stay in the evenings. P atrons that anticipate a longer visit during the daytime hours are encouraged to use the free valet service. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-37 197279v1 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-37 AMENDING PARKING TIME LIMITS FOR MUNICIPAL PARKING FACILITIES WHEREAS, Division 5, Article VIII of Chapter 24 of the Edina City Code regulates municipal parking facilities; and WHEREAS, Section 24-395 of the City Code provides that time limits for parking within municipal parking facilities are established by resolution of the City Council; and WHEREAS, The City desires to establish time limits for parking within municipal parking facilities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA that the following time limits for municipal parking facilities are hereby adopted: Municipal Parking Facility Level Number of Stalls (approximate) Hourly Time Limits During Business Hours (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday) South Ramp Lower Level 80 2 hours South Ramp First Level 110 2 hours (typical) 15 minutes (1 stall) South Ramp Second Level 110 3 hours South Ramp Third Level 114 3 hours 51st Street Alley Surface 6 1 hour Center Ramp Level P1 North Ramp Lower Level 45 2 hours North Ramp First Level 72 2 hours North Ramp Second Level 72 2 hours North Ramp Third Level 72 3 hours North Ramp Fourth Level (Rooftop) TBD 3 hours 3943 W. 50th Street Lot Surface 15 1 hour (typical) 10 minutes (2 stalls) 197279v1 ADOPTED by the Edina City Council this 17th day of April, 2018. Attest: ____________________________ ______________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) (ss. CITY OF HENNEPIN ) The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the Edina City Council on April 17, 2018 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the same is a correct transcription thereof, WITNESS my hand officially as such City Clerk and the corporate seal of the City this _______ day of __________________, 2018. City Clerk Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-40: Extension requesting additional time from the Metropolitan Council for submission of the City of Edina's 2018 Comprehensive Plan Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-40 requesting the Metropolitan Council an extension for submittal of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan. T his will allow the City more time to complete and provide time for adjacent jurisdictions to review the Plan prior to submital to the Metropolitan Council for review. INTRODUCTION: The Metropolitan Council is requiring cities to decide by May 31, 2018 if they will be submitting their Comprehensive Plans before the December 31 deadline. While it is the City of Edina's goal to have the City's plan completed by the end of the year, an extension will be required, as adjacent cities are allowed up to a six- month review period. Therefore, staff would like to submit an extension for up to one year, just in case more time is required. We have experienced delays from the beginning of the planning process due to the resignation of the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission just before starting the plan, to the Big Ideas Workshop, to each of the small area plans requiring more time to complete. Therefore, staff is asking the City Council to adopt the attached resolution to request the Met Council for an extension. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-40 Staff Report Comp Plan RESOLUTION NO. 2018-40 RESOLUTION REQUESTING ADDITIONAL TIME WITHIN WHICH TO COMPLETE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN “DECENNIAL” REVIEW OBLIGATIONS WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.864 requires local governmental units to review and, if necessary, amend their entire comprehensive plans and their fiscal devices and official controls at least once every ten years to ensure comprehensive plans conform with metropolitan system plans and ensure fiscal devices and official controls do not conflict with comprehensive plans or permit activities that conflict with metropolitan system plans; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes sections 473.858 and 473.864 require local governmental units to complete their “decennial” reviews by December 31, 2018; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.864 authorizes the Metropolitan Council to grant extensions to local governmental units to allow local governmental units additional time within which to complete the “decennial” review and amendments; and WHEREAS, any extensions granted by the Metropolitan Council must be submitted by May 31, 2018, and must include a timetable and plan for completing the review and amendment; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will not be able to complete its “decennial” review by December 31, 2018, for the following reasons: 1. The City experienced delays from the start of the process including the resignation of the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning Commission during the beginning planning phase. 2. The start of the planning process was delayed due to the scope of the work being altered and meetings were added up front. 3. The time frame for each small area plan (44th & France, 70th and Cahill, and 50th and France) were significantly increased to add more public meetings, more work group meetings, and add more time for public input and more time for review of draft plans. WHEREAS, the City Council finds it is appropriate to request from the Metropolitan Council an extension so the City can have additional time to complete and submit to the Metropolitan Council for review an updated comprehensive plan and amend its fiscal devices and official controls. NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL that: 1. The City Planner is directed to submit to the Metropolitan Council no later than May 31, 2018, an application requesting an extension to December 31, 2019. 2. The City Planner is directed to include with the request a reasonably detailed timetable and plan for completing the review and amendment by December 31, 2019, and the review and amendment of the City’s fiscal devices and official controls. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-40 Page 2 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on April 17, 2018. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 April 17, 2018 Mayor and City Council Cary Teague, Community Development Director Resolution No. 2018-40: Extension requesting additional time from the Metropolitan Council for submission of the City of Edina's 2018 Comprehensive Plan Approve the attached resolution requesting an extension for submission of the City of Edina’s 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update to the Metropolitan Council. Information / Background: The Metropolitan Council is requiring City's to decide by May 31st, 2018 if they will be submitting their Comprehensive Plans prior to the December 31st, 2018 deadline. While it is the City's goal to have the City's plan completed by the end of the year, an extension will be required, as adjacent Cities are allowed up to a 6 month review period. Therefore, staff would like to submit an extension for up to one year, just in case more time is required. The Metropolitan Council requires local governmental units to review and, if necessary, amend their entire comprehensive plans and their fiscal devices and official controls at least once every ten years to ensure comprehensive plans conform with metropolitan system plans and ensure fiscal devices and official controls do not conflict with comprehensive plans or permit activities that conflict with metropolitan system plans. Minnesota Statutes sections 473.858 and 473.864 require local governmental units to complete their “decennial” reviews by December 31, 2018. Minnesota Statutes section 473.864 authorizes the Metropolitan Council to grant extensions to local governmental units to allow local governmental units additional time within which to complete the “decennial” review and amendments to their 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. The unanticipated departure of the Planning Commission Chair and Vice-Chair, and an initial delay in approval of the Comprehensive Plan Charter, which in turn delayed appointment of consultants, explains events contributing to submission of an extension request. As part of the 2018 Comp Plan Update, the City of Edina has also initiated three Small Area plans, (44th and France, 70th and Cahill and 50th and France), along with previous on-going work on two District Wide Plans: Grandview and the Greater Southdale, all to be completed and included in the 2018 Comp Plan Update. Each Small Area Plan has taken more time in all respects, including more REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 work group time/meetings, community engagement, drafting and editing. Each Small Area Plan is a concentrated Comprehensive Plan for each of the small areas. The amount of public participation, city staff and consultant time for work on the Small Area Plans is a major contributing factor in the delay request for Plan completion. The delayed start in appointing a consultant and effort and time needed to complete the Small Area Plans along with competition of the over-all Comprehensive Plan is the basis for this request. Attached is a resolution requesting additional time from the Metropolitan Council within which to complete the City of Edina’s 2018 Comprehensive Plan. Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Approve Traffic Safety Reports of February 16 and March 6, 2018 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve the Traffic Safety Reports of February 16 and March 6, 2018. INTRODUCTION: The Edina Transportation Commission (ET C) reviewed the February 16 and March 6, 2018 Traffic Safety Reports at their March 15 meeting and moved to forward the reports to the City Council for approval. See attached draft minutes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Traffic Safety of Feb 16, 2018 Staff Report: Traffic Safety of Mar 6, 2018 DRAFT Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission March 15, 2018 Map: Location of 6400 Xerxes April 17, 2018 Edina City Council Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of February 16, 2018 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on February 16. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, Police Lieutenant, Engineering Director, Public Works Director, Traffic Safety Specialist, Assistant City Planner and Transportation Planner were in attendance for this meeting. For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included on the March 15 Edina Transportation Commission and the April 17 City Council meeting agendas. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action: A1. Request to add signage in front of the residence of 6400 Xerxes Ave A resident recently became an amputee and is requesting a handicap or no parking sign The resident can only enter/leave their home thru the front door because of limitations Resident is concerned with vehicles traveling around their parked car while loading/unloading on York Other vehicles sometimes park in front of this home Southbound Xerxes has no parking restriction in this area Southbound Xerxes has 2 lanes with a width of 35’ STAFF REPORT Page 2 After review, staff recommends adding a handicap parking sign in front of the home of 6400 Xerxes to accommodate the resident. Hennepin County will be contacted as Xerxes Ave is under County jurisdiction and any added signage must be approved thru the County. A2. Request to restrict parking on the south side of Littel St Littel has no parking restrictions Requestor witnessed a garbage truck having difficulties turning onto Littel from Lynn Ave There is one homeowner on the south side of Littel Littel is 20’ wide After review, staff recommends restricting parking on one side of Littel St. Staff will compose a letter for adjacent residents informing them of the purpose to allow adequate space for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to travel thru Littel. A3. Request to add one-sided parking on Creek Valley Rd Request was made from a delivery person who was concerned with the lack of space between cars parked on both sides of Creek Valley Rd Creek Valley Rd has no parking restrictions EHS students tend to park on the street at this location during school days When vehicles are parked along the curve of Creek Valley Rd, 13’ of driving lanes remain available 21’ is required for EMS vehicles to pass thru curves After review, staff recommends restricting parking along the inside portion of the two curves on Creek Valley Rd. This will allow better access for EMS vehicles to travel into the end of Creek Valley Rd. Staff will be composing a letter to residents being immediately impacted of the parking restrictions informing them the purpose of the restrictions. A4. Request to restrict parking on the west side of Oakdale Ave Oakdale has no parking restrictions Map: Location of Littel St Map: Location of Creek Valley Rd with a high level of on‐street parking STAFF REPORT Page 3 Map: Location of Oakdale Ave Map: Location of Cornelia Circle in relation to Rosland Park Concerns towards service and EMS vehicles entering Oakdale Oakdale is measured at 24’ wide Morningside Rd and Branson St lead to Oakdale which has a dead-end The south side of Branson street is restricted parking After review, staff recommends restricting parking to one side of the street. Staff will compose a letter to inform residents along Oakdale of the recommendation placed by the Traffic Safety Committee. Following the feedback from residents, it is recommended restrict parking on the east side of Oakdale. A5. Request for a pedestrian ramp on W 66th St at Cornelia Circle A resident that lives in Cornelia Cir uses the sidewalk on the north side of W 66th St on a regular basis and finds it difficult to cross W 66th and ‘hop the curb’ with bicycles and strollers Total pedestrian crosses at this location are seven with a two hour peak of six crosses ADT on W 66th was 8,161 in 2013with 85% speed of 33.5 mph A pedestrian path from Rosland Park leads to this section of W 66th After review, staff recommends adding a pedestrian ramp to the sidewalk along W 66th St. Staff agrees adding a pedestrian ramp may help pedestrians cross W 66th St using wheelchairs or strollers etc. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Map: Location of W 49th St, Maple and Townes Rd Map: Location of St. Johns Ave and Garrison Ln Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action: B1. Request for one-sided parking along W 49th St, Townes and Maple Rd Resident is concerned with safety when cars are parked along these streets Parking demand on these streets may increase with work taking place on 50th and France North parking structure There are no parking restrictions on both streets Maple is classified as a local connector while W 49th and Townes is a local street The width of Maple, W 49th and Townes is 29’ After review, staff recommends no action towards parking restrictions. Current work taking place near 50th and France is causing workers in the area to park in this neighborhood on a temporary basis. With the increase in on-street parking, this will likely result in slower vehicle speeds. A future study may take place within these limits to see the construction impacts on this neighborhood. B2. Request for an all-way stop at the intersection of St. Johns Ave and Garrison Ln A resident is concerned with pedestrian safety in this area and is requesting an all-way stop Garrison is ‘yield’ controlled as St. Johns is uncontrolled Garrison and St. Johns are classified as local streets Garrison and St Johns have ADTs of 160 and 190 respectively One two-vehicle collision was reported in 2013 A sight-line issue may impact drivers at the north-west quadrant of the intersection After review, staff recommends no action as this intersection does not meet any warrants and placing any stop-control at this location should not increase overall safety. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Map: Location of W 62nd St and Hansen Rd Map: Location of Tracy Ave and Highland Rd (note‐the stars represent all‐way stops) B3. Request for an all-way stop at the intersection of Hansen Rd and W 62nd St A resident is concerned with traffic safety requesting an all-way stop at this 3-legged intersection W 62nd is stop controlled and Hansen is uncontrolled Hansen is classified as a local connector and W 62nd is a local street W 62nd (2016) and Hansen (2013) have ADTs of 340 and 1623 respectively Hansen ADT was collected south of Maddox Ln with an assumption of many vehicles turning onto Maddox as a neighborhood ‘cut-thru’ Three collisions have taken place at this intersection in the last five years 85% speed on Hansen is 30 MPH After review, staff recommends no action as this intersection does not meet warrants to become all-way controlled. B4. Request for an all-way stop at the intersection of Tracy Ave and Highland Rd A resident requested all-way stops citing an increase in traffic, drivers are failing to yield to children in the crosswalk, a home on Tracy built a fence to protect their children from vehicles Highland is stop controlled and Tracy is uncontrolled Tracy is classified as a collector and Highland is a local street Tracy and Highland have ADTs of 5935 and 275 No crashes have been reported at this location in the last five years Tracy has all-way stops at Benton Ave and Olinger Blvd After review, staff recommends no action as an all-way stop is not warranted. Adding an unwarranted all-way stop could lead to increased vehicle speeds on Tracy Ave as drivers may try to ‘make up for lost time’ having to stop at this unwarranted intersection. STAFF REPORT Page 6 Map: Location of West Shore Dr and Upper Ter Map: Location of Valley Ln and Ridgeview Dr being affected during rush hours B5. Request to remove a stop sign at the intersection of West Shore Drive and Upper Terrace Resident who lives near this intersection is concerned with northbound vehicles failing to obey the stop sign Resident is not interested in raising police enforcement This three-legged intersection is all-way stop controlled Northbound, southbound and eastbound ADT at this intersection is 379, 418 and 147 respectively North and southbound vehicles represent 84% of total traffic approaching the intersection Pedestrians entering the intersection totaled 123 with a peak hour of 25 at 6 pm A restricted view exists on the south west corner of the intersection After review, staff recommends no action. This intersection was designed to slow drivers when it was reconstructed. Removing this stop sign could lead to dangerous situations with the amount of pedestrians entering the intersection, especially given the restricted view on the southwest corner of the intersection. B6. Request for traffic calming on Valley Lane and Ridgeview Drive Residents have concerns with the amount of vehicles traveling eastbound on Valley Ln/ southbound on Ridgeview Increased peak hour vehicles are making it difficult for residents to get out of driveway 2014 and 2017 southbound Ridgeview peak hour was 535 and 794 (48% increase) 2014 and 2017 ADT on Ridgeview was 2,724 and 4,563 (68% increase) Southbound vehicles on Ridgeview tend to stack from W 66th to Valley Ln Of the 3,001 southbound vehicles on Ridgeview, 91% turn left onto W 66th St After review, staff recommends no action. Staff is aware this section of roadway is classified as a state-aided “collector” road with a higher volume of traffic. This roadway layout will be considered in future reconstruction in-line with necessary state-aid projects. STAFF REPORT Page 7 Map: The area in red is where parking is taking place Map: The location in the rectangle is where the resident is requesting signage (note‐ the stars are all‐way stops) B7. Request for signage to raise awareness for children at a school bus stop on W 44th St Resident nearby is concerned with the raised traffic and speeds on W 44th when children are waiting for a bus stop Resident is requesting a pedestrian sign or a ‘Bus Stop Ahead’ sign ADT has increased 44% to 4,365 from 2013 to 2016 From 2013 to 2016 the 85% speed has increased from 31.6 MPH to 32.2 MPH W 44th St is classified as a Collector street A sidewalk is located on the north side of W 44th After review, staff recommends no action. This stretch of W 44th St is straight and no signage is warranted for a bus stop ahead as the location is visible from an adequate distance. Section C: Items on which staff recommends further study C1. Request to add restricted parking along McGuire Park A nearby resident is concerned with the level of on-street parking in the neighborhood caused by students Concerns were raised back in 2016 when Edina High School was undergoing renovations and construction was taking up school parking spaces Students began parking along Antrim, W 69th, Brook and McGuire Residents are concerned with vehicles being parked on both sides of the street along the curves at McGuire Park, leaving a narrow travel space Parking restrictions were implemented on the south side of W 69th in the fall of 2016 After review, staff recommends further study before any definite recommendation takes place. The Police Department has been issuing flyers informing drivers parking in this area they are infringing on Edina’s 6-hour parking limit. This area will also be studied when Edina High School conducts a transportation study later this year. STAFF REPORT Page 8 Map: Location of Cornelia Circle in relation to Rosland Park C2. Request for a pedestrian ramp on W 66th St at Cornelia Circle A resident that lives in Cornelia Cir uses the sidewalk on the north side of W 66th St on a regular basis and finds it difficult to cross W 66th and ‘hop the curb’ with bicycles and strollers Total pedestrian crosses at this location are seven with a two hour peak of six crosses ADT on W 66th was 8,161 in 2013with 85% speed of 33.5 mph A pedestrian path from Rosland Park leads to this section of W 66th After initial review, staff recommended no action (staff believed pedestrian activity in this area does not require any pedestrian ramps along W 66th St. and did not want to encourage pedestrian/bicycle crossing at this location for safety reasons). However, the Edina Transportation Commission recommended further study to review the appropriateness of a curb ramp at this location. Staff agreed and will conduct further review. Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. A resident was concerned with vehicle speeds on Blake Rd near Scriver Rd and requested speed bumps. The resident was informed Edina does not place speed bumps on public streets. With the concern of vehicle speeds, a temporary speed trailer request was placed and forwarded to the EPD. D2. A resident is concerned with traffic noise and is requesting a sound wall. The engineering department was informed vehicle noise is an issue in this neighborhood and will keep this in mind with future MnDOT sound wall projects. D3. A resident is requesting a stop light at the intersection of York and Parklawn. The resident is concerned with pedestrian safety despite new RRFB’s being installed in recent years. Edina is reviewing this intersection and has been in contact with Hennepin County for any future improvements. D4. A resident is requesting a crosswalk across France at W 58th St. W 58th St currently has no pedestrian facilities. W 58th Street between Wooddale Ave and France Ave will be reconstructed with new pedestrian facilities in 2020. This will impact possible crossings at France. Hennepin County was informed of this request, and are aware of the W 58th St reconstruction taking place in 2020. D5. A resident was concerned with the amount of on-street parking near the intersection of Benton Ave and Hansen Rd. After review, the issue has not occurred since the concern was reported. This will continue to be monitored. STAFF REPORT Page 9 D6. A resident that lives directly north of HWY 62 off the Wyman Ave Bridge was requesting to restrict parking on Wyman Ave. The resident is concerned with exiting their driveway while vehicles are parked near. This neighborhood was recently reconstructed and Wyman Ave was designed for one-sided parking. D7. A resident requested the pedestrian lights to automatically show walk signs at the beginning of light cycles at the intersection of Interlachen Blvd and Vernon Ave. The resident is concerned vehicles do not yield to pedestrians, as they aren’t given the ‘Walk’ symbol. Hennepin County reviewed this request and since changed the pedestrian crossing time to add a lead pedestrian interval (LPI) to increase the level of safety for crossing pedestrians. D8. A resident was concerned with the reflectivity of median delineators near the entrance of EHS. Upon review, these delineators were brand new and installed in September following the mill and overlay on Valley View Rd. Road grime from vehicles caused the reflectivity to lower, but will improve once rain and snow washes it away. D9. A resident is concerned with on-street parking at Peacedale Ave. The concern was regarding the length of parking and parking overnight on Peacedale. After inspecting, this concern was forwarded to the EPD for future patrolling. D10. A resident contacted traffic safety to report a large build-up of snow in front of an RRFB sign on W 66th St and West Shore Drive. The resident was informed this request was forwarded to Edina Public Works and the concern has been resolved. STAFF REPORT Page 10 Appendix A: Stop Sign Warrants At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.8 and 2B.9). The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and/or C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. STAFF REPORT Page 11 Appendix B: All-Way Stop Warrants Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.4 also apply to multi-way stop applications. The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. Map: Location of Golf Terrace and Lakeview Dr April 17, 2018 Edina City Council Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of March 6, 2018 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on March 6. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, Police Lieutenant, Engineering Director, Public Works Director, Assistant City Planner and Transportation Planner were in attendance for this meeting. The Traffic Safety Specialist was not able to attend and was informed of the decisions and did not object to the recommendations. For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included on the March 15 Edina Transportation Commission and the April 17 City Council meeting agendas. Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action: B1. Request for an all-way stop control at the intersection of Golf Terrace and Lakeview Dr A resident was concerned with the safety of this intersection and requesting an all-way stop This is an uncontrolled three-legged intersection Golf Terrace is all-way stop controlled at St. Johns- one block east of Lakeview Golf Terrace and Lakeview are both classified as local streets Golf Terrace and Lakeview have ADTs of 610 and 135, respectively Golf Terrace and Lakeview have 85% speeds of 29.6 and 24.9 MPH respectively One crash was reported at this location in the last 5 years STAFF REPORT Page 2 Map: Location of request to change parking restriction Map: Location of W 57th St and Abbot Ave After review, staff recommends no action at this intersection. Staff believes adding a stop sign at this intersection when un-warranted, can lead to an increase of dangerous situations. B2. Request for two-way stop control at the intersection of W 57th St and Abbott Ave A resident from this neighborhood is requesting a two-way stop control at this intersection as this intersection has led to near accidents This intersection is all-way uncontrolled W 57th St is two-way stop controlled at Beard Ave- one block west Abbott is two-way stop controlled at W 58th St- one block south Abbott and W 57th are classified as local streets Abbott and W 57th have ADTs of 140 and 225 respectively Abbott and W 57th 85% speeds are 24 and 25 MPH respectively No crashes have been reported at this location in the last five years A large tree in the south west corner of the intersection causes difficulties for approaching drivers After review, staff recommends no action. This intersection does not meet warrants for installing stop controls. No sight line issues were found to impact approaching drivers. Section C: Items on which staff recommends further study C1. Request to change parking restricting on Valley View Rd Resident is concerned with vehicles parking near their driveway which limits their visibility to see passing vehicles Resident’s home is on the south side of Valley View with no parking restriction, the north side of Valley View has restricted parking A sidewalk project is taking place in 2018 on the south side of Valley View, adjacent to this residents’ property ADT on Valley View Rd is 1,970 with an 85% speed of 35.2 MPH STAFF REPORT Page 3 After review, staff recommends reviewing this concern following the summer 2018 sidewalk project. Once the sidewalk is installed, staff will review sight distances to analyze if concerns persist. Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. A resident is requesting Edina to place more sharrows on the road. As a bicyclist, this resident feels comfortable biking on roads when sharrows are present. Edina informed the resident sharrows will be utilized only in a few locations of the city when bikes and vehicles are required to share the road, given road availability. D2. A couple residents submitted an online request to clear sidewalks within days after a snowfall. The residents were informed to contact Public Works for snow clearing requests. By the time the locations were analyzed, snow had been cleared. D3. A resident was concerned with the visibility of delineators at the entrance of Edina High School. After analyzing the delineators, Public Works was informed of this issue and cleaned the reflectors to enhance the visibility. D4. A resident was concerned with vehicles failing to stop at stop signs an requested an ‘All-Way’ sign to be placed below the stop signs at the intersection of Vernon Ave and Tamarac Ave. Public Works was able to install these signs and the Police Department was informed to increase police enforcement in this area. D5. A resident called to report a concern with traffic speeds on W 56th St, West of HWY 100. After analyzing recent, credible data, the 85% speeds in this neighborhood were 28.4 MPH. A request for a temporary speed trailer was made to be placed for westbound traffic entering onto W 56th St from Normandale Rd to raise driver awareness of speeds. D6. A resident was concerned with vehicle backups for east and westbound traffic on W 50th St at France Ave. The Traffic Safety Committee is aware of this issue as current construction on Market Street can be leading to more congestion in this area. This concern was forwarded to the City of Minneapolis to review light timing as this intersection is not under Edina’s jurisdiction. D7. A resident contacted traffic safety in regards to improving the safety of York Ave and Edinborough Way. This intersection borders Edina, Richfield and Bloomington. As York is under Hennepin County jurisdiction, they were informed of the concern to study to find a potential solution to this concern. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Appendix A: Stop Sign Warrants At intersections where a full stop is not necessary at all times, consideration should first be given to using less restrictive measures such as YIELD signs (see Sections 2B.8 and 2B.9). The use of STOP signs on the minor-street approaches should be considered if engineering judgment indicates that a stop is always required because of one or more of the following conditions: A. The vehicular traffic volumes on the through street or highway exceed 6,000 vehicles per day; B. A restricted view exists that requires road users to stop in order to adequately observe conflicting traffic on the through street or highway; and/or C. Crash records indicate that three or more crashes that are susceptible to correction by the installation of a STOP sign have been reported within a 12-month period, or that five or more such crashes have been reported within a 2-year period. Such crashes include right-angle collisions involving road users on the minor-street approach failing to yield the right-of-way to traffic on the through street or highway. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Appendix B: All-Way Stop Warrants Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.4 also apply to multi-way stop applications. The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room March 15, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Richman called the meeting to order II. Roll Call Answering roll call were commissioners Ahler, Johnson, Kane, McCarthy, Olson, Richman, Ruthruff, Scherer, Veluvali, Ma Absent: Commissioner Yaeger III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner Ahler to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by commissioner Ruthruff and seconded by commissioner Kane approving the February 15, 2018 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None. VI. Reports/Recommendations C. Traffic Safety Reports if February 16 and March 6, 2018 February 16th and March 6th reports were reviewed February 16th Traffic Safety Report, Item B7. Move item to “C” for further study Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by Ahler to move item B7 to C on the February 16th Traffic Safety Report and approve the traffic safety report as amended. All voted Aye, motion carried. Motion was made by commissioner Ahler and seconded by Ruthruff to the approve March 6th Traffic Safety Report. All voted Aye, motion carried. Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2018-06, Resolution No. 2018-41: Final Rezoning, Final Development Plan, and Site Improvement Plan Agreement Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-41 and approve the Site Improvement P lan Agreement. INTRODUCTION: The Final Plans are consistent with approved P reliminary Development Plan. T he applicant has designed the access off Interlachen Boulevard to accommodate an additional lane as required by the City Council. (See page A5 of the Final Plans.) ATTACHMENTS: Description Final Plans Preliminary Plans Resolution No. 2018-41 Ordinance No. 2018-06 Caribou Rezoning Site Improvement Agreement D E V E L O P E R : OR I O N I N V E S T M E N T S E D I N A I I I , L L C 45 3 0 W E S T 7 7 t h S T R E E T , S U I T E 3 6 5 ED I N A , M N 5 5 4 3 5 PH O N E : 6 1 2 - 8 1 2 - 7 7 8 8 CO N T A C T : T E D C A R L S O N A R C H I T E C T : ED W A R D F A R R A R C H I T E C T S 77 1 0 G O L D E N T R I A N G L E D R I V E ED E N P R A I R I E , M N 5 5 3 4 4 PH O N E : 9 5 2 - 6 4 2 - 9 6 6 0 CO N T A C T : D O N A N D E R S E N C I V I L E N G I N E E R : AL L I A N T E N G I N E E R I N G , I N C . 23 3 P A R K A V E N U E MI N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 PH O N E : 6 1 2 - 7 5 8 - 3 0 8 0 CO N T A C T : M A R K K R O N B E R G L A N D S C A P I N G : AL L I A N T E N G I N E E R I N G , I N C . 23 3 P A R K A V E N U E MI N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 PH O N E : 6 1 2 - 7 5 8 - 3 0 8 0 CO N T A C T : M A R K K R O N B E R G SH E E T I N D E X A1 . 1 C O V E R S H E E T A1 . 2 E X I S T I N G V I E W S A1 . 3 C O L O R E D S I T E P L A N CI V I L C- 1 . 0 S U R V E Y C- 2 . 0 D E M O L I T I O N P L A N C- 3 . 0 S I T E P L A N C- 4 . 0 G R A D I N G , D R A I N A G E & ER O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N C- 5 . 0 U T I L I T Y P L A N C- 6 . 0 D E T A I L S L- 1 . 0 L A N D S C A P E P L A N P- 1 . 0 P H O T O M E T R I C P L A N AR C H I T E C T U R A L A2 E L E V A T I O N S A3 F L O O R P L A N A4 S I T E S E C T I O N S A5 A R C H I T E C T U R A L S I T E P L A N & SI G N A G E P L A N IN T E R S E C T I O N V E R N O N a n d I N T E R L A C H E N IN T E R L A C H E N E N T R A N C E VI E W A L O N G V E R N O N Sheet Title Project Number Sheet NumberIssued For DateProjectClientProject ManagerDateReg. No.I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or under my dire ct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2017 Location C : \ U s e r s \ D L A \ D o c u m e n t s \ S P R _ 1 7 0 5 7 C a r i b o u - E d i n a I I I 5 0 0 0 V e r n o n _ D L A . r v t 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 9 : 0 0 : 5 5 A M A1-01 17.057COVER SHEETORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLCDate16362DLA CARIBOU COFFEE &EINSTEIN BAGELS 5000 VERNON AVE EDINA, MINNESOTA 50 0 0 Ve r n o n Av e . So u t h Ed i n a , Mi n n e s o t a Ca r i b o u Co f f e e & Ei n s t e i n Ba g e l s xxxxxxxxxxxxxSPR 0 1 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 SPR-RESUBMITTAL 0 1 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 8 SPR-FINAL 0 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 VI E W F R O M I N T E R L A C H E N BE F O R E AF T E R DR I V E T H R U EX I S T I N G V I E W V E R N O N S T R E E T EX I S T I N G I N T E R S E C T I O N V E R N O N a n d I N T E R L A C H E N EX I S T I N G A E R I A L EX I S T I N G B U I L D I N G a n d N E W B U I L D I N G C O M P A R I S O N Sheet Title Project Number S h e e t N u m b e r Issued For D a t e ProjectClientProject ManagerDate R e g . N o . I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or under my dire ct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2017 Location C : \ U s e r s \ D L A \ D o c u m e n t s \ S P R _ 1 7 0 5 7 C a r i b o u - E d i n a I I I 5 0 0 0 V e r n o n _ D L A . r v t 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 9 : 0 0 : 5 9 A M A1-02 17.057EXISTING VIEWSORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLCDate16362DLA CARIBOU COFFEE &EINSTEIN BAGELS 5000 VERNON AVE EDINA, MINNESOTA SPR-RESUBMITTAL 0 1 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 8 SPR-FINAL 0 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 SI T E P L A N NSheet Title Project Number S h e e t N u m b e r Issued For D a t e ProjectClientProject ManagerDate R e g . N o . I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or under my dire ct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2017 Location C : \ U s e r s \ D L A \ D o c u m e n t s \ S P R _ 1 7 0 5 7 C a r i b o u - E d i n a I I I 5 0 0 0 V e r n o n _ D L A . r v t 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 9 : 0 1 : 0 0 A M A1-03 17.057COLORED SITE PLANORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLCDate16362DLA CARIBOU COFFEE &EINSTEIN BAGELS 5000 VERNON AVE EDINA, MINNESOTA SPR-RESUBMITTAL 0 1 / 2 9 / 2 0 1 8 SPR-FINAL 0 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY & EINSTEIN BROS. BAGELS SITE PLAN REVIEW SURVEY 2 3 3 P a r k A v e S , S t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 1 5 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 8 0 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 9 9 w w w . a l l i a n t - i n c . c o m M A I N F A X V E R N O N A V E N U E I N T E R L A C H E N B L V D . SUMMIT AVENUE CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY & EINSTEIN BROS. BAGELS SITE PLAN REVIEW DEMOLITION PLAN K n o w w h a t ' s b e l o w . C a l l b e f o r e y o u d i g . D i a l 8 1 1 2 3 3 P a r k A v e S , S t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 1 5 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 8 0 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 9 9 w w w . a l l i a n t - i n c . c o m M A I N F A X DR I V E TH R U W A I T S T A L L W A I T S T A L L V E R N O N A V E N U E I N T E R L A C H E N B L V D . SUMMIT AVENUE CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY & EINSTEIN BROS. BAGELS SITE PLAN REVIEW SITE PLAN 2 3 3 P a r k A v e S , S t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 1 5 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 8 0 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 9 9 w w w . a l l i a n t - i n c . c o m M A I N F A X K n o w w h a t ' s b e l o w . C a l l b e f o r e y o u d i g . D i a l 8 1 1 DRIVE THRU W A I T S T A L L W A I T S T A L L V E R N O N A V E N U E I N T E R L A C H E N B L V D . SUMMIT AVENUE A D A P A R K I N G A N D A C C E S S D E T A I L N O T T O S C A L E 1 CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY & EINSTEIN BROS. BAGELS GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 2 3 3 P a r k A v e S , S t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 1 5 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 8 0 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 9 9 w w w . a l l i a n t - i n c . c o m M A I N F A X DRIVE THRU W A I T S T A L L W A I T S T A L L V E R N O N A V E N U E I N T E R L A C H E N B L V D . SUMMIT AVENUE CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY & EINSTEIN BROS. BAGELS SITE PLAN REVIEW UTILITY PLAN 2 3 3 P a r k A v e S , S t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 1 5 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 8 0 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 9 9 w w w . a l l i a n t - i n c . c o m M A I N F A X CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY & EINSTEIN BROS. BAGELS SITE PLAN REVIEW DETAILS ROUND BOLLARD WITH ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGENOT TO SCALE 1PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPNOT TO SCALE 8 B 6 1 2 C U R B A N D G U T T E R - O U T F A L L N O T T O S C A L E 3 B612 CURB AND GUTTE R NOT TO SCALE 2 C O N C R E T E S I D E W A L K N O T T O S C A L E 4 C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T N O T T O S C A L E 5 L I G H T - D U T Y B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T N O T T O S C A L E 6 H E A V Y - D U T Y B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T N O T T O S C A L E 7 N O T E : G E O T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T F O R T H C O M I N G . G E O T E C H N I C A L R E C O M E N D A T I O N S T O S U P E R C E E D D E T A I L S I N C A S E O F D I S C R E P E N C Y . 2 3 3 P a r k A v e S , S t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 1 5 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 8 0 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 9 9 w w w . a l l i a n t - i n c . c o m M A I N F A X V E R N O N A V E N U E I N T E R L A C H E N B L V D . SUMMIT AVENUE CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY & EINSTEIN BROS. BAGELS SITE PLAN REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLAN NOT TO SCALENOT TO SCALE K n o w w h a t ' s b e l o w . C a l l b e f o r e y o u d i g . D i a l 8 1 1 2 3 3 P a r k A v e S , S t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 1 5 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 8 0 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 9 9 w w w . a l l i a n t - i n c . c o m M A I N F A X DRIVE THRU W A I T S T A L L W A I T S T A L L V E R N O N A V E N U E I N T E R L A C H E N B L V D . SUMMIT AVENUE EM1 S3 S3 S 3 S 3 S 3 P E - 1 S 3 E M 1 E S3 S3 S3 S 3 S3EM1 E M 1 E M 1 EM1ECC P - 1 C C DD BBBBAA 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.30.60.70 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 5 0 . 7 0 . 6 0 . 2 0 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 4 0 . 3 0.10.20.20.81.00.6 0.5 0.6 0 . 5 0 . 5 0 . 4 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.10.10.10.10.10.20.20.30.40.30.30.30.40.40.30.20.30.30.50.80.70.40.40.20.10.00.0 0.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.00.00.10.00.00.10.10.10.0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.10.10.10.10.10.40.30.20.1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.10.40.2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.10.10.71.31.71.21.4 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.10.21.42.22.22.32.92.91.7 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.10.12.01.82.93.65.35.24.8 2 . 5 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.10.11.52.03.65.16.3 6 . 1 3 . 3 1 . 0 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.00.11.12.24.75.5 6 . 3 5 . 7 3 . 1 1 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.00.11.13.24.3 7 . 3 3 . 8 2 . 2 1 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.00.11.12.44.9 5 . 8 2 . 9 1 . 9 0 . 4 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.00.10.61.11.84.6 1 6 . 5 2 . 9 1 . 9 1 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0.00.10.10.50.81.22.03.6 4 . 2 3 . 1 1 . 9 2 . 0 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.00.10.20.71.01.22.12.73.7 5 . 9 3 . 4 2 . 6 1 . 9 1 . 7 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.10.10.20.91.31.31.52.55.66.5 9 . 1 5 . 0 2 . 4 1 . 7 1 . 5 1 . 5 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.00.10.21.01.81.71.24.35.44.7 4 . 6 3 . 2 1 . 8 1 . 2 1 . 1 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.00.10.11.21.91.92.24.24.53.9 2 . 8 2 . 0 1 . 3 0 . 9 0 . 7 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.00.00.11.32.02.73.33.93.32.6 1 . 9 1 . 3 0 . 8 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.00.00.11.62.33.12.52.72.62.1 1 . 5 0 . 9 0 . 5 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.00.00.11.82.43.01.81.82.12.0 1 . 4 0 . 6 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.00.00.11.52.22.50.91.42.12.1 1 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.00.00.11.21.81.90.91.82.12.1 0 . 6 0 . 1 0 . 1 0 . 0 0.00.00.10.91.61.61.72.32.61.0 0 . 2 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.00.00.00.61.31.82.12.42.5 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.00.00.00.40.91.72.12.71.3 0 . 3 0 . 1 0 . 1 0.00.00.00.31.01.62.30.70.3 0 . 2 0 . 1 0.00.00.00.30.91.41.00.20.2 0 . 1 0.00.00.00.30.60.70.30.10.1 0.00.00.00.20.30.20.00.00.0 0.00.00.10.10.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.0 0.00.0 0.0 L u m i n a i r e S c h e d u l e S y m b o l Q t y L a b e l A r r a n g e m e n t T o t a l L a m p L u m e n s L L F D e s c r i p t i o n L u m . W a t t s 1 A A S I N G L E N . A . 0 . 9 0 0 M C G R A W G L E O N - A F - 0 2 - L E D - E 1 - S L 4 - H S S M O U N T O N 1 6 F T P O L E W I T H 2 F T B A S E 1 1 3 2 B B S I N G L E N . A . 0 . 9 0 0 M C G R A W G L E O N - A F - 0 1 - L E D - E 1 - T 2 M O U N T O N 1 6 F T P O L E W I T H 2 F T B A S E 5 9 2 C C S I N G L E N . A . 0 . 9 0 0 M C G R A W G L E O N - A F - 0 1 - L E D - E 1 - T 4 F T M O U N T O N 1 6 F T P O L E W I T H 2 F T B A S E 5 9 1 D D S I N G L E N . A . 0 . 9 0 0 M C G R A W G W C - A F - 0 1 - L E D - E 1 - T 4 F T W A L L M O U N T A T A P P R O X 1 8 F T 5 9 4 E M 1 S I N G L E N . A . 0 . 9 0 0 M C G R A W I S C - A F - 3 5 0 - L E D - E 1 - T 3 - B Z W A L L M O U N T A T A P P R O X 9 F T 2 0 . 0 9 2 E M 1 E S I N G L E N . A . 0 . 9 0 0 M C G R A W I S C - A F - 3 5 0 - L E D - E 1 - T 3 - B Z - C W B W A L L M O U N T A T A P P R O X 9 F T 2 0 . 0 9 1 P - 1 S I N G L E N . A . 0 . 9 0 0 H A L O P D 6 1 5 E D 0 1 0 B - P D M 6 A 8 4 0 - 6 1 V H W F 1 8 . 5 1 P E - 1 S I N G L E N . A . 0 . 9 0 0 H A L O P D 6 1 5 E D 0 1 0 B I E M - P D M 6 A 8 4 0 - 6 1 V E M H W F 1 8 . 5 1 1 S 3 S I N G L E 6 5 8 . 2 4 0 . 9 0 0 M O D E R N F O R M S W S - W 6 8 6 1 8 - B Z A 0 1 0 4 1 6 W A L L M O U N T A T A P P R O X 7 F T 1 8 . 9 C a l c u l a t i o n S u m m a r y L a b e l C a l c T y p e U n i t s A v g M a x M i n A v g / M i n M a x / M i n E A S T P R O P E R T Y L I N E I l l u m i n a n c e F c 0 . 2 7 0 . 7 0 . 0 N . A . N . A . S I T E G R O U N D I l l u m i n a n c e F c 0 . 9 1 1 6 . 5 0 . 0 N . A . N . A . S O U T H P R O P E R T Y L I N E I l l u m i n a n c e F c 0 . 3 9 1 . 0 0 . 1 3 . 9 0 1 0 . 0 0 W E S T P R O P E R T Y L I N E N O R T H I l l u m i n a n c e F c 0 . 0 4 0 . 1 0 . 0 N . A . N . A . W E S T P R O P E R T Y L I N E R E S I D E N T I A L I l l u m i n a n c e F c 0 . 2 6 0 . 5 0 . 1 2 . 6 0 5 . 0 0 W E S T P R O P E R T Y L I N E S O U T H I l l u m i n a n c e F c 0 . 4 3 0 . 8 0 . 1 4 . 3 0 8 . 0 0 B U I L D I N G R E A R P A R K I N G I l l u m i n a n c e F c 1 . 6 1 2 . 1 1 . 2 1 . 3 4 1 . 7 5 N E P A R K I N G I l l u m i n a n c e F c 2 . 2 3 5 . 6 0 . 5 4 . 4 6 1 1 . 2 0 N W P A R K I N G I l l u m i n a n c e F c 1 . 0 0 1 . 4 0 . 7 1 . 4 3 2 . 0 0 6 1 3 0 B l u e C i r c l e D r . , M i n n e t o n k a , M N 5 5 3 4 3 P h 9 5 2 - 2 1 7 - 0 4 0 0 - F a x 9 5 2 - 9 3 0 - 1 6 3 2 w w w . p u l s e p r o d u c t s . c o m CARIBOU COFFEE COMPANY & EINSTEIN BROS. BAGELS SITE PLAN REVIEW PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 2 3 3 P a r k A v e S , S t e 3 0 0 M i n n e a p o l i s , M N 5 5 4 1 5 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 8 0 6 1 2 . 7 5 8 . 3 0 9 9 w w w . a l l i a n t - i n c . c o m M A I N F A X P L E A S E C O N T A C T S A N D Y A N D E R S O N A T P U L S E F O R P R I C I N G . E - M A I L : s a n d y @ p u l s e p r o d u c t s . c o m P H O N E : ( 9 5 2 ) 8 7 3 - 7 4 7 8 ( O F F I C E ) ( 6 5 1 ) 5 9 2 - 0 1 6 5 ( M O B I L ) T\ H I G H P A R A P E T 20 ' - 0 " T\ M I D P A R A P E T 17 ' - 4 " NO R T H E L E V A T I O N WE S T E L E V A T I O N EA S T E L E V A T I O N SO U T H E L E V A T I O N T\ L O W P A R A P E T 16 ' - 0 " 1 13 4289 3 6 5 13 3 2 1 9 8 82 7 6 14 3 107 7 15 4 4 12 12 11 68 S F 36 S F 36 S F 6 16 MA T E R I A L S : 1. AL U M I N U M T R E L L I S S Y S T E M 2. FA B R I C A W N I N G 3. TE N A N T S I G N A G E 4. LI G H T F I X T U R E 5. DR I V E -TH R U W I N D O W 6. ST O N E C A P 7. PR E -FI N I S H E D M E T A L C O P I N G 8. DO W N S P O U T C O N D U C T O R H E A D - PRE -FINISHED METAL 9. DO W N S P O U T - PREFINISHED METAL 10 . IN S U L A T E D H M D O O R & F R A M E 11 . ME N U B O A R D & S P E A K E R B O X L O C A T I O N IN F O R E G R O U N D 12 . LO C A T I O N O F G A S M E T E R & E L E C T R I C A L UT I L I T I E S 13 . LO W ' E ' I N S U L A T E D G L A S S I N A N O D I Z E D A L U M I N U M F R A M E S 14 . 'G R A I N T E C H ' W O O D EMBOSSED METAL DOOR 15 . HV A C U N I T S 16 . AN O D I Z E D A L U M I N U M D O O R '#'BRICK - BELDEN SEAL BROWN VELOUR BRICK - BELDEN WHEATFIELD VELOUR ENVIRONMENTAL STONEWORKS LANTANA TUSCAN LEDGESTONE Sheet Title Project Number S h e e t N u m b e r Issued For D a t e ProjectClientProject ManagerDate R e g . N o . I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or under my dire ct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2017 Location C : \ U s e r s \ D L A \ D o c u m e n t s \ S P R _ 1 7 0 5 7 C a r i b o u - E d i n a I I I 5 0 0 0 V e r n o n _ D L A . r v t 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 9 : 0 1 : 0 6 A M A2 17.057ELEVATIONSORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLCDate16362DLA CARIBOU COFFEE &EINSTEIN BAGELS 5000 VERNON AVE EDINA, MINNESOTA 0'2'4' 8 ' 0' 2' 4' 8 ' 0' 2' 4' 8 ' 0' 2' 4' 8 ' SPR 0 1 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 SPR-FINAL 0 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 R A M P D O W N 2, 7 4 8 S F BO L L A R D PA T I O BI K E R A C K BO L L A R D PI C K -UP W I N D O W S ME N U B O A R D / BO L L A R D OR D E R P O S T / BO L L A R D CO N C R E T E C U R B RE T A I N I N G W A L L LANDSCAPING LA N D S C A P I N G Sheet Title Project Number S h e e t N u m b e r Issued For D a t e ProjectClientProject ManagerDate R e g . N o . I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or under my dire ct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2017 Location C : \ U s e r s \ D L A \ D o c u m e n t s \ S P R _ 1 7 0 5 7 C a r i b o u - E d i n a I I I 5 0 0 0 V e r n o n _ D L A . r v t 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 9 : 0 1 : 1 1 A M A3 17.057FLOOR PLANORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLCDate16362DLA CARIBOU COFFEE &EINSTEIN BAGELS 5000 VERNON AVE EDINA, MINNESOTA SC A L E : 3 / 1 6 " = 1 ' - 0 " A31 FL O O R P L A N 0 5'10'TRUE NSPR 0 1 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 SPR-FINAL 0 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 TO M A T C H E X I S T I N G NE W R E T A I N I N G W A L L E X I S T I N G R E T A I N I N G W A L L TR A N S F O R M E R W A L L EL E C T R I C A L TR A N S F O R M E R OU T L I N E O F P R O P O S E D BU I L D I N G B E Y O N D DR I V E W A Y EN T R A N C E R . O . W . AR T W O R K T O B E D E T E R M I N E D RO O F T O P ME C H A N I C A L UN I T PR O P O S E D BU I L D I N G PI C K -UP WI N D O W 4 F T T A L L SC R E E N W A L L SI D E W A L K VE R N O N AV E N U E R . O . W . 4 F T T A L L SC R E E N W A L L SI D E W A L K VE R N O N AV E N U E PI C K -UP WI N D O W PR O P O S E D BU I L D I N G ME N U B O A R D RE T A I N I N G WA L L LA N D S C A P E BU F F E R P R O P E R T Y L I N E SUMMIT PLACE (SENIOR LIVING) PA R A P E T A B B A CC . Sheet Title Project Number S h e e t N u m b e r Issued For D a t e ProjectClientProject ManagerDate R e g . N o . I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or under my dire ct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2017 Location C : \ U s e r s \ D L A \ D o c u m e n t s \ S P R _ 1 7 0 5 7 C a r i b o u - E d i n a I I I 5 0 0 0 V e r n o n _ D L A . r v t 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 9 : 0 1 : 1 2 A M A4 17.057SITE SECTIONSORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLCDate16362DLA CARIBOU COFFEE &EINSTEIN BAGELS 5000 VERNON AVE EDINA, MINNESOTA SC A L E : 1 " = 1 0 ' - 0 " A44 SI T E S E C T I O N C - C SC A L E : 1 " = 1 0 ' - 0 " A43 SI T E S E C T I O N B - B SC A L E : 1 " = 1 ' - 0 " A42 SI T E S E C T I O N K E Y M A P SC A L E : 1 " = 1 0 ' - 0 " A41 SI T E S E C T I O N A - A 0' 5' 10 ' 2 0 ' 0'5'10' 2 0 ' 0'5'10' 2 0 ' SPR 0 1 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 SPR-FINAL 0 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 8' - 8"10' - 0"6' - 0"DRIVE THRU EXISTING SIGN POST. PAINTED2 SIDED METAL SIGN BOX INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED (52 SF) V E R N O N A V E N U E I N T ER L A C H E N BL VD V A C A T E D S U M M I T A V E N U E • RE S I D E N T I A L ZO N E PC D ZO N E SP E A K E R P O S T / ME N U B O A R D BI K E R A C K WI D E N E X I S T I N G C U R B C U T RE T A I N I N G W A L L EX I S T I N G C U R B C U T RE M O V E D 5 F T . W I D E C I T Y CL E A R B U F F E R 5' W I D E C I T Y T R A I L PA R K I N G S E T B A C K BU I L D I N G S E T B A C K 3 12 5 2 WI D E N E X I S T I N G CU R B C U T PI C K -UP WI N D O W S B Y - P A S S L A N E S T A C K I N G L A N E S2S3 S3 S1 S3 BR I C K RO O F T O P ME C H A N I C A L U N I T S 17 ' -6" 17 ' -6" LA N D S C A P E I S L A N D BI K E L A N E ( F U T U R E ) RE T A I N I N G W A L L 1 2 3 4 5678 FU T U R E V E R N O N A V E N U E LA N E I M P R O V E M E N T S FU T U R E I N T E R L A C H E N B L V D LA N E I M P R O V E M E N T S PA T I O PE R V I O U S PA V E M E N T EM P L O Y E E PA R K I N G PR E -OR D E R ME N U B O A R D EM P L O Y E E P A R K I N G D N 5 % D N 5 % RA I L I N G LA N D S C A P I N G "P I C K -UP W A I T I N G " SI G N A G E AC C E S S I B L E S I D E W A L K TR A S H EN C L O S U R E LA N D S C A P I N G CI T Y S I D E W A L K 1112 "D O N O T EN T E R " S I G N ST O P S I G N a n d " N O L E F T TU R N B E T W E E N 6 A M a n d 9 A M " (H O U R S T B D ) CR O S S W A L K S T R I P I N G SI G N " D O N O T B L O C K D R I V E W A Y " EX I S T I N G P O W E R P O L E S RE M O V E D B Y O W N E R SI D E W A L K W I T H S T E P S SI D E W A L K W I T H S T E P S 1 3 1 4 16" W x 12" H PLAQUE SIGN VENDOR TO VERIFY -6' - 4"8'-6" 3' - 11"1' - 0" ME S S A G E A S A P P L I C A B L E 2' - 6 " 4 ' - 0 " 1 ' - 7 1 / 2 " DO U B L E F A C E D IN T E R N A L L E D IL L U M I N A T I O N 4 ' - 0 " 10 " - 4 ' - 7 " 7'-5" AL U M I N U M A N O D I Z E D IN T E R N A L L Y I L L U M I N A T E D Sheet Title Project Number S h e e t N u m b e r Issued For D a t e ProjectClientProject ManagerDate R e g . N o . I hereby certified that this plan,specification or report was prepared by me or under my dire ct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota Edward A. Farr ©COPYRIGHT 2017 Location C : \ U s e r s \ D L A \ D o c u m e n t s \ S P R _ 1 7 0 5 7 C a r i b o u - E d i n a I I I 5 0 0 0 V e r n o n _ D L A . r v t 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 9 : 0 1 : 1 4 A M A5 17.057ARCHITECTURAL SITE & SIGNAGE PLANORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLCDate16362DLA CARIBOU COFFEE &EINSTEIN BAGELS 5000 VERNON AVE EDINA, MINNESOTA N 0' 10 ' 20 ' 4 0 ' SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"A52PYLON SIGN S1 SC A L E : 1 " = 2 0 ' - 0 " A51 AR C H I T E C T U R A L S I T E P L AN a n d S I G N A G E P L A N SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0"A53CLEARANCE BAR S2 SC A L E : NO S C A L E A54 DI R E C T I O N A L S I G N A G E S 3 SC A L E : NO S C A L E A55 ME N U B O A R D SPR 0 1 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 8 CITY COMMENTS 0 3 / 0 2 / 2 0 1 9 CITY COMMENTS 3 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 8 SPR-FINAL 0 4 / 1 1 / 2 0 1 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-41 RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL REZONING, AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 5000 VERNON AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Ted Carlson on behalf of Caribou Coffee and Einstein Bagels is proposing to tear down the existing 5,000 square foot structure at 5000 Vernon Avenue and construct a new 2,748 square foot Caribou Coffee and Einstein Bagel Shop and drive-through. Per the Grandview Transportation Study, the applicant is proposing to provide a 5-foot easement on both Interlachen and Vernon to provide for future roadway improvements; and is proposing to bury all above ground utility wires/poles. 1.02 The request requires the following: Rezoning from Planned Commercial District 4, (PCD-4) to Planned Commercial District 2, (PCD-2) Setback Variances as follows: 1. Building Front Yard Setback (Vernon) from 35 to 25 feet 2. Parking/Drive Aisle Setback (Interlachen) from 20 feet to 5 feet (Existing condition) 3. Parking/Drive Aisle Setback (Vernon) from 20 feet to 4 feet (Existing condition) 4. Parking/Drive Aisle Setback (Rear) from 10 feet to 8 feet (Existing condition) 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A. 1.04 On March 14, 2018 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended denial the proposal. Vote: 8 Ayes, 1 Nay. 1.05 On March 20, The City Council held a public hearing and approved the request subject to the findings and conditions outlined below. Vote: 4 Ayes, 1 Nay. 1.06 On April 17, 2018, the City Council considered the Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Section 2. APPROVAL & FINDINGS RESOLUTION NO. 2018-41 Page 2 NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the proposed Final Re-Zoning and Final Development Plan at 5000 Vernon Avenue. 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed uses are allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. 2. The proposed development would be an improvement over the existing use and buildings on the site. 3. The City would receive needed right-of-way along Vernon and Interlachen for future roadway improvements. 4. The existing utility poles and overhead wires would be removed and buried. 5. The proposed variances are reasonable. The practical difficulties for this site include the small lot size, the triangular shape and being a corner lot located on arterial roadways. 6. The existing building and parking areas are considered legal existing non-conforming uses. The proposed development would be more in conformance than existing conditions. 7. Spack consulting has concluded that the existing roadways can support the proposed use, and with proper on site management of the drive-through, the drive-through stacking should not extend on to public roadways. 2.02 Approval is conditions upon the following: 1. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 2. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer’s memo dated March 7, 2018. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks near the building entrances. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent residential property, per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-41 Page 3 6. Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum lighting requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting shall be down lit. 7. Compliance with the recommendations in the Space Traffic Impact Study, with the exception of the reconfiguration of the drive-through to be dual lane. 9. Employees will be encouraged to park in the Jerry’s Public Parking Ramp. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-41 Page 4 Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on April 17, 2018. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - 06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY ZONING MAP FROM PCD-4 to PCD-2, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 36-402 is amended by rezoning from PCD-4 to PCD-2, Planned Commercial District the following described property located within the City of Edina: See attached Exhibit A. Section 2. The official zoning map of the City of Edina referred to and described in Section 36-402 of the Edina City Code shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the zoning map on file in the City Clerk’s office shall be appropriately marked for the purpose of indicating the rezoning provided for in this ordinance. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: March 20, 2018 Second Reading: April 17, 2018 Published: April 26, 2018 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 197149v2 1 (reserved for recording information) SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA 5000 VERNON AVENUE AGREEMENT dated ____________________, 2018, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“City”) and ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLC a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”). 1. BACKGROUND. A. Developer has applied to develop the following legally described property in the City of Edina, Minnesota: Lots 29, 30, 31 and 32, Block 3, "Grand View Heights", except that part of said Lots taken by the State of Minnesota for state highway purposes, and except vacated Summit Avenue adjoining said Lot 29. The Easterly 1.00 foot of that portion vacated Summit Avenue adjoining Block 3, "Grand View Heights" as dedicated in said plat, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 4, "Grand View Heights"; thence Easterly along the Easterly extension of the South line of said Lot 5 to a point on centerline of said Summit Avenue being the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence Northerly along said centerline of Summit Avenue to the Southerly right-of-way of Interlachen Boulevard (County Road No. 20); thence Southeasterly to the most Northerly corner of Lot 32, Block 3, "Grand View Heights"; thence Southerly along the West line of said Block 3 to its intersection with the Easterly extension of the Southerly line of said Lot 5; thence Westerly to the point of beginning. 197149v2 2 Certificate of Title No. 846981 (hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”) B. The City has rezoned the Subject Property to Planned Commercial District 4, (PCD-4). 2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin County Recorder’s Office, 2) the required security has been received by the City, and 3) evidence of the required insurance has been received by the City. 3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The Plans are: Civil Engineering Plans A1.1 COVER SHEET 4-11-2018 A1.2 EXISTING VIEWS 4-11-2018 A1.3 COLORED SITE PLAN 4-11-2018 C-1.0 SURVEY 1-15-2018 C-2.0 DEMOLITION PLAN 1-15-2018 C-3.0 SITE PLAN 1-15-2018 C-4.0 GRADING, DRAINAGE & 1-15-2018 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-5.0 UTILITY PLAN 1-15-2018 C-6.0 DETAILS 1-15-2018 L-1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 3-07-2018 P-1.0 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1-15-2018 A2 ELEVATIONS 4-11-2018 A3 FLOOR PLAN 4-11-2018 A4 SITE SECTIONS 4-11-2018 A5 ARCHITECTURAL SITE 4-11-2018 PLAN & SIGNAGE PLAN 197149v2 3 The Developer may request changes to the Plans. For Plan changes deemed minor, pursuant to City ordinances, changes can be reviewed and approved by City staff. All other Plan changes shall require approval by the City Council. 4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity. Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which may include temporary seed to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City and such failure to comply continues for a period in excess of five (5) days after Developer’s receipt of written notice from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. In the event of an emergency or if Developer’s failure to comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with the Erosion Control Plan will cause imminent damage or destruction to persons or property, then the City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days of receipt of written notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved Erosion Control Plan. 5. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Subject Property to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City as required under this Agreement. 197149v2 4 6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance with the Construction Management Plan. 7. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Public Improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standard specifications and ordinances. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are prohibited between the hours of 9 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. All Public Improvement Plans shall be prepared by a competent registered professional engineer and submitted to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer’s engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s expense, not to exceed $5,000, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City’s inspectors. The Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer’s engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Public Improvements and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible “as constructed” plans and an electronic file of the “as constructed” plans that satisfy the City’s record drawings requirement which are attached. The Record Drawings shall be submitted prior to the Developer receiving an occupancy permit for any building on the Subject Property. 8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. 197149v2 5 9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required Public Improvements by November 20, 2018. 10. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction in the Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control, street cleaning, and street sweeping. 11. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City, the Public Improvements identified in the Plans lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. Prior to acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Developer must furnish the following affidavits: • Contractor’s Certificate • Engineer’s Certificate • Developer’s Certificate certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. All necessary forms will be furnished by the City. Upon receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed public improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the improvements, to the extent not previously delivered to the City, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "record” plans, an electronic file of the “record” plans in accordance with the City’s Design and Construction Manual. 12. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay for in-house engineering administration. City in-house engineering administration will include monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, Project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. The cost of in-house engineering administration shall not exceed $5,000. 13. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement and all of the Plans, payment of the costs of all Public Improvements, and construction of all Public 197149v2 6 Improvements, the Developer shall either deposit cash with the City or furnish the City with a letter of credit in the form attached hereto (or some combination of cash and a letter of credit), from a bank in the total amount of Thirty-Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($35,000.00) ("security") and a cash fee of Five Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($500.00) for City engineering administration. The bank issuing the letter of credit shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager. The City may draw down the security, on five (5) business days written notice to the Developer, for any violation of the terms of this Agreement or without notice if the security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required Public Improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down upon five (5) business days written notice to the Developer and shall hold the same until Developer is entitled to reimbursement or disbursement hereunder. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that the Project has been substantially completed in accordance with the Plans and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%) of the security shall be retained as security until all Public improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a warranty is provided, and the Public Improvements are accepted by the City Council. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures for security reductions. 14. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Public Improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for all Public Improvements is one year and shall commence following completion. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final certified construction costs of the Public Improvements to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty work. The City’s standard specifications for utility construction identify the procedures for final acceptance of utilities. 197149v2 7 15. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. Developer shall comply with all of the conditions outlined in City Council resolution 2018-27 and in the Director of Engineering’s memo dated March 7, 2018. If the Director of Engineering’s memo conflicts with the City Council resolution, the City Council resolution takes precedence. 16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the site and installation of the Public Improvements, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and development of the Subject Property, the preparation of this Agreement, review of any other plans and documents. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Developer’s development of the site and installation of Public Improvements. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including reasonable attorneys' fees. C. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year. 17. MISCELLANEOUS. A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this Agreement. B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including property conveyed to third parties. 197149v2 8 C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Agreement. D. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of Public Improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Public Improvements and damage to Public Improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connections or inspections may be conducted and no one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. F. This Agreement shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property or has obtained consents to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto, from all parties who have an interest in the property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. G. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $100,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on 197149v2 9 the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage. Developer shall cause the City to be provided ten (10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The Developer and contractors must provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements: (1) The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.” (2) Certificate Holder must be City of Edina. (3) Provide copy of policy endorsement showing City of Edina named as Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis. H. The Developer and its general contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to the limit of $100,000.00 each accident. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it. K. An uncured breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer and the failure to cure such breach within the period provided in this Agreement, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy, and the halting of all work on the property. 197149v2 10 L. The Developer represents to the City that the development and construction of improvements on the Subject Property will comply with all city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the development does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the development until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s written demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. M. From time to time, when requested by Developer, the City shall execute and deliver a recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this Agreement. 18. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer beyond the applicable notice and cure periods provided in this Agreement as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any actual, out-of-pocket expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given written notice of the work in default, not less than ten (10) days in advance. This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 19. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: Orion Investments Edina III, LLC, c/o Carlson Commercial, 4530 West 77th Street, Suite 365, Edina, Minnesota 55435. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 197149v2 11 CITY OF EDINA BY: __________________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor AND __________________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2018, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC 197149v2 12 DEVELOPER: ORION INVESTMENTS EDINA III, LLC BY: ___________________________________ Name: _________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________, 2018, by _________________________, the _________________________ of Orion Investments Edina III, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. ______________________________________________ NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 [RNK] 197149v2 13 IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. ___________________ Date: _________________ TO: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 2_____, of (Name of Bank) "; b) Be signed by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2_____. This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty- five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: ____________________________________ Its ______________________________ Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief and Dave Fisher, Chief Building Official Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Building Safety Month Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Proclamation for Building Safety Month - May 2018 INTRODUCTION: The proclamation for May of 2018, as Building Safety Month and demonstrate our commitment to building safety and fire prevention in our community. T his year’s theme is Code Officials— Partners in Community Safety and Economic Growth. Building Safety Month is a public awareness campaign to help individuals, families and businesses understand what it takes to create safe and sustainable structures. T he campaign reinforces the need for adoption of modern, model building codes, a strong and efficient system of code enforcement and a well-trained, professional workforce to maintain the system. The campaign is presented by the ICC and its 57,000 members worldwide along with a diverse partnership of professionals from the building construction, design and safety community. Corporations, government agencies, professional associations, nonprofits and more come together to support Building Safety Month because they understand the need for safe and sustainable structures where we live, work and play. Our department is using Building Safety Month to educate the community. It is an opportunity to increase public awareness of the role building safety and fire prevention officials, local and state building departments and federal agencies play to protect lives and property. They are the “silent defenders” who are seldom seen but work daily to ensure safety in the built environment. ATTACHMENTS: Description Proclamation: Building Safety Month Proclamation BBBBuilding Safety Month uilding Safety Month uilding Safety Month uilding Safety Month ———— May, 20May, 20May, 20May, 2011118888 Whereas, our City is committed to recognizing our growth and strength depends on the safety and economic value of the homes, buildings and infrastructure that serve our citizens, both in everyday life and in times of natural disaster, and; Whereas, our confidence in the structural integrity of these buildings that make up our community is achieved through the devotion of vigilant guardians––building safety and fire prevention officials, architects, engineers, builders, tradespeople, design professionals, laborers and others in the construction industry––who work year-round to ensure the safe construction of buildings, and; Whereas, these guardians are dedicated members of the International Code Council, a U.S. based organization, that brings together local, state and federal officials that are experts in the built environment to create and implement the highest-quality codes to protect us in the buildings where we live, learn, work, worship, play, and; Whereas, our nation benefits economically and technologically from using the International Codes that are developed by a national, voluntary consensus codes and standards developing organization, our government is able to avoid the high cost and complexity of developing and maintaining these codes, which are the most widely adopted building safety and fire prevention codes in the nation; these modern building codes include safeguards to protect the public from natural disasters such as hurricanes, snowstorms, tornadoes, wildland fires, floods and earthquake; and; Whereas, Building Safety Month is sponsored by the International Code Council to remind the public about the critical role of our communities’ largely unknown guardians of public safety––our local code officials–– who assure us of safe, efficient and livable buildings that are essential to keep America great, and; Whereas, “Building Codes Save Lives” the theme for Building Safety Month 2018, encourages all Americans to raise awareness of the importance of building safe and resilient construction; fire prevention; disaster mitigation, and new technologies in the construction industry. Building Safety Month 2018 encourages appropriate steps everyone can take to ensure that the places where we live, learn, work, worship and play are safe, and recognizes that countless lives have been saved due to the implementation of safety codes by local and state agencies, and, Whereas, each year, in observance of Building Safety Month, Americans are asked to consider the commitment to improve building safety and economic investment at home and in the community, and to acknowledge the essential service provided to all of us by local and state building departments, fire prevention bureaus and federal agencies in protecting lives and property. NOW, THEREFORE, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the month of May 2018 as Building Safety Month. Accordingly, I encourage our citizens to join with their communities in participation in Building Safety Month activities. _________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Proclamation: Arbor Day 2018 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adoption of P roclamation INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Arbor Day 2018 Proclamation Proclamation - Arbor Day 2018 April 17, 2018 City Council Ann Kattreh Parks & Recreation Director Arbor Day Proclamation, April 27, 2018 Information / Background: Proclaim April 27, 2018 Arbor Day. Arbor Day is a holiday in which individuals and groups are encouraged to plan and care for trees. It originated in Nebraska City, Nebraska by J. Sterling Morton. The first Arbor Day was held on April 10, 1872 and an estimated one million trees were planted that day. Many countries now observe a similar holiday. Though usually observed in the spring, the date varies, depending on climate and suitable planting season. City Forester, Luther Overholt will recognize Arbor Day by planting trees at Garden Park. The tree planting will take place on Friday, April 27 at 10 a.m. This year staff will be planting four trees, species to be determined by the best available stock at the nursery; they will be 20 gallon containerized trees. PROCLAMATION ARBOR DAY APRIL 27, 2018 WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and WHEREAS, forest soils prevent flooding and reduce storm water by capturing and storing rainwater and snowmelt, which is then slowly released to our lakes, streams and groundwater; and WHEREAS, trees and forests improve our physical health by cleaning the air, reducing exposure to the sun’s UV rays and decreasing temperatures during the summertime; and WHEREAS, One tree provides $62,000 worth of pollution control over a period of 50 years; and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life-giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wildlife, and WHEREAS, forests create high-quality drinking water by acting as a natural filter; and WHEREAS, Edina is proud of the beautiful shade trees which grace our homes and public places; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim April 27, 2018 be Arbor Day and call upon the spirited and foresighted citizens of Edina to plant trees now for our pleasure and that of future generations. Dated this 17th day of April 2018. _________________________________ James B. Hovland Mayor Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2018-07, Resolution No. 2018-38 & Resolution No. 2018-39; Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for Hazelton LLC at 3650 Hazelton Road Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2018-38 Approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Adopt Resolution No. 2018-39 Approving Preliminary Rezoning and Development Plan. Approve first Reading of Ordinance No. 2018-07 INTRODUCTION: On March 28, 2018 the P lanning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 4 Ayes and 1 Nay. See attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report Site Location, Sketch Plan & Guiding Principles & Original AFO Review Applicant Narrative & Plans Engineering Memo Traffic Study Parking Study Resolution No. 2018-38 Resolution No. 2018-39 Ordinance No. 2018-07 Planning Commission Minutes Staff Presentation Developer Presentation March 28, 2018 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, & Preliminary Development Plan for Hazelton Apartments, 3650 Hazelton Road. Information / Background: The applicant, 3650 Hazelton, LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.25 acre parcel at 3650 Hazelton Road. As proposed, the existing Guitar Center would be torn down and a 19-story, 186 unit luxury apartment with underground parking would be constructed. Features of the development include: A Podium structure provided at ground level, with the units opening outward to access directly toward the Promenade. Enclosed and underground parking that is not visible from the Promenade or Hazelton Road. Public plaza and pedestrian connections to the Promenade and Hazelton Road. The applicant is proposing to meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy by providing a dedication of $1.86 million to provide affordable housing within the City. Additionally the applicant is proposing small 1-bedroom and Studio/Micro units. These smaller and very efficient units will provide a new housing option to the Edina marketplace. These micro units would generally range in size from 412 - 446 square feet and would be ideal for a college graduate, young professional, young couple returning home and looking for a new home, corporate transfers interested in Edina, single empty nesters and retired persons. Sustainability. LEED or Green Globe designation would be pursued. Amenity terrace including a pool. STAFF REPORT Page 2 To accommodate the request the following is required: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the height maximum from 8 stories and 96 feet to 19 stores and 218 feet; and increase the density in the MXC, Mixed Use Center in the Greater Southdale Area from 100 units per acre to 150 units per acre; A Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District-3 to PUD-14, Planned Unit Development; and Staff is further recommending that flexibility language be included in the Comprehensive Plan to allow the City the flexibility to approve projects that would exceed the Comprehensive Plan height requirements through rezoning or variance in the Greater Southdale Area and the MXC, Mixed Use Center. After June 30, 2018, the Metropolitan Council will no longer consider amendments to any 2008 Comprehensive Plan. That in effect, could put the City of Edina in a moratorium on development for a minimum of one year. Over the past 10 years in Edina, most re-development proposals in the Greater Southdale Area or in areas guided MXC, Mixed Use Center (50th & France and Grandview) have exceeded the Comprehensive Guide Plan designations for height, and have required a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. If the current 2018 Comprehensive Planning process remains on schedule (concluding in December of 2018), the earliest the Met Council would approve Edina’s Plan would be June of 2019. The Met Council requires a 6-month review process for themselves and adjacent cities. In adopting this amendment, the City would not lose its regulatory controls in these areas as the City amended the Zoning Ordinance regarding height so that the Zoning Ordinance matched the Comprehensive Plan. Building height is typically a function of Zoning regulations and not a Comprehensive Plan. These changes would not impact the recent Small Area Plans at 44th and France, Valley View and Wooddale or 70th and Cahill. The Southdale Area Working Principles were shared with the applicant. (See the attached applicant responses to the Working Principles.) The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson has provided a review of the proposed project; the review is based on the Greater Southdale Area Work Group principles. (See attached.) The applicant has since gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. (See attached sketch plans and minutes.) Based on feedback from the Planning Commission, the City Council, and the review from Mic Johnson, the applicant has: Revised the configuration of the sidewalk on Hazelton Road to be curved. Enhanced the landscaping on all side. Height has increased from 17 to 19 stories (8 feet). (This includes the rooftop mechanical equipment.) Unit increase from 170 to 186 units. Would meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Provided Public Art. Added a green roof. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Modified the west façade. Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone, meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has complete discretion when reviewing this application. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Brandon Square retail shops; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Easterly: Super Target; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Southerly: Think Bank; zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Westerly: Retail Shops; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.25 acres in size, is relatively flat with a retail use and surface parking Planning Guide Plan designation: MXC, Mixed Use Center. Zoning: PCD-3, Planned Commercial District Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1311, 1.25 fully enclosed spaces and .75 surface spaces are required per dwelling unit. (2 spaces per unit.) Therefore, the 186 unit apartment would require 372 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing 298 enclosed parking spaces or 1.6 spaces per unit. Spack Consulting conducted a parking study and determined that 1.6 spaces per unit would be adequate. (See attached study.) Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Access to the proposed development would be off Hazelton Road, into the enclosed and underground parking. Spack Consulting also conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project. The proposed development would generate more traffic than the existing use on the site, but would general less traffic than a code compliant medical office building. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 22 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans show that 32 trees would be planted. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are also proposed. A portion of the landscaping proposed is located on the Promenade. Plans for these areas are conceptual and subject to review and approval of the Parks Department. Final plans would be determined at the time of Final Rezoning. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. A site improvement plan agreement would be required for the construction/repair of sidewalks and utilities and connections to the Promenade. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination of brick, stone, and glass, with metal panel accents. The applicant will have a materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading area would be on the west side of the building west of the entrance. Trucks would pull in forward and would enter the building through the parking garage. Trucks could back out within the project before entering Hazelton Road. Shadow Study As requested at sketch plan, the applicant completed a shadow study to determine impacts the height of the buildings might have. As demonstrated, the biggest impact would be in the winter months. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the STAFF REPORT Page 5 approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The proposal to add 168 units of housing on the Promenade would increase and enhance pedestrian movement in the area. Direct connections to the Promenade would be made from individual units and from the apartment. There would be dedicated bike storage and a bike maintenance area. STAFF REPORT Page 6 COMPLIANCE TABLE While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the underlying zoning: * Variance Required Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment – Density/Height To accommodate the request, the following Comprehensive Plan amendments are requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the MXC, Mixed Use Center in the Greater Southdale Area from 100 units per acre to 150 units per acre; and Regarding height, staff is recommending that flexibility language be included in the Comprehensive Plan to allow the City the flexibility to approve projects that would exceed the Comprehensive Plan height requirements in the Greater Southdale Area and the MXC, Mixed Use Center District through rezoning or variance. As mentioned, after June 30, 2018, the Metropolitan Council will no longer consider amendments to any 2008 Comprehensive Plan. That in effect, could put the City of Edina in a moratorium on development for a minimum of one year. Over the past 10 years in Edina, most re-development proposals in the Greater Southdale Area or in areas guided MXC, Mixed Use Center (50th & France and Grandview) have exceeded the Comprehensive Guide Plan designations for height, and have required a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. If the current 2018 City Standard (PCD-3) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – Hazelton Road Side - East Side – West Rear – North 218 feet (based on height) 218 feet (based on height) 218 feet (based on height) 218 feet (based on height) Podium Tower 51 feet 70 feet* 12 feet* 30 feet* 20 feet* 70 feet* 10 feet* 10 feet* Building Height Eight stories and 96 feet Nineteen stories and 218 feet* Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.00% 6.5%* Parking Stalls 340 enclosed (residential) 298 enclosed* Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet STAFF REPORT Page 7 Comprehensive Planning process remains on schedule (concluding in December of 2018), the earliest the Met Council would approve Edina’s Plan would be June of 2019. The Met Council requires a 6-month review process for themselves and adjacent cities. Therefore, staff recommends the following amendment regarding height. Please note that all of the height requirements shown in Figures 4.6A, 4.6B and 4.6C have been put into law in the City’s Zoning Ordinance. (See the attached Building Height Overlay Districts.) Additionally, this recommendation does not impact the 44th & France, 70th and Cahill, or Valley View/Wooddale Small Area Plans. The following are the recommended changes to the Comprehensive Plan regarding Height: The revision language is in “red.” Plain text – existing language in the 2008 Plan Stricken Language is removed. 10. Building Heights. The question of building height is particularly significant in a largely developed community, where any new building has the potential to block views or cast shadows on established neighborhoods and land uses. The design guidelines above, as well as the recommended building heights in Figures 4.6A, 4.6B, and 4.6C, (Figures are shown on the following pages) provide general guidance for buildings that exceed the typical residential height of 2.5 stories. The City Council may consider individual projects that exceed the height recommendations in 4.6B and in the MXC, Mixed Use Center through a rezoning to PUD or Variance. Consideration for exceeding these height limits shall include but not be limited to: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Meeting and exceeding goals and policies outlined within the Comprehensive Plan Providing exceptional building quality, use of podium or liner buildings Sustainability measures within the development Pedestrian oriented development Providing significant publicly-accessible space, public realm and green space, enhancing the experience in the area where development is proposed Utilizing underground parking Providing affordable housing Proximity to low density uses Utility capacity; level of transit service available; and provisions to reduce negative impact on adjacent roads Meeting Variance and/or PUD Criteria STAFF REPORT Page 8 STAFF REPORT Page 9 STAFF REPORT Page 10 Density. The proposed uses would be an upgrade to the current building on the site. The proposed density (6.5 FAR and 150 units per acre) is very high. (See the tables on the following pages.) The trade-off in allowing more height is the higher quality building/development with connections to the promenade, public space, hidden parking, and a contribution to the City’s affordable housing. Greater height and density has been contemplated in between France and York as part of the STAFF REPORT Page 11 Greater Southdale Area Study. As a comparison of density; the following table represents densities in other Edina multi-family residential developments: High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 6500 France – Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar - Onyx 6725 York 240 52 Hazelton Road Apartments 3650 Hazelton Road 186 150 Bus Garage – Trammel Crow Eden Avenue 165 100 The Collaborative Market Street 131 46 Gateway Point 66th & York 191 96 The Millennium 66th & York 372 60 Lincoln Residences 5901 Lincoln Drive 250 30 Red – Indicates recent projects Example Residential Density Ranges in Surrounding City’s Comprehensive Plans City Range – Per Acre Bloomington High Density Residential No limit Commercial (Community & Regional) 0-83 High Intense mix use 0-60 Airport South mix use 30-131 Richfield STAFF REPORT Page 12 High Density Residential Minimum of 24 Mixed Use 50+ St. Louis Park High Density Residential 20-75 (PUD for high end) Mixed Use 20-75 (PUD for high end) Commercial 20-50 Minnetonka High Density Residential 12+ Mixed Use No range established (density based on site location and site conditions.) Minneapolis High Density (mixed use) 50-120 Very High Density(mixed use) 120+ The MXC District is one of the higher density areas in Edina. This one is located in between France and York Avenue’s which is an area contemplated for higher density and height. The proposed density is reasonable to activate this area and provide more activity in the adjacent public spaces and retail businesses. It is also consistent with densities allowed in Minneapolis and Bloomington’s high density areas. If the adjacent Promenade were included in the overall development calculation the overall density would be 86 units per acre, which is more similar to recent development proposals. MXC Mixed-Use Center Established or emerging mixed use districts serving areas larger than one neighborhood (and beyond city boundaries). Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Maintain existing, or create new, pedestrian and streetscape amenities; encourage or require structured parking. Buildings “step down” in height from intersections. Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code: 100 units/acre The City Council may approve a project for up to 150 units per acre through a PUD rezoning in the Greater Southdale Area MXC, Mixed-Use Center. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, use of podium or liner buildings, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, enhancing the experience in the area where development is proposed underground parking, affordable housing, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. STAFF REPORT Page 13 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most all of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Mixed Use Center” which allows for retail and housing. The proposal is a high quality residential STAFF REPORT Page 14 development that would enhance the surrounding area, taking advantage of the adjacent Promenade and commercial area. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass. They are designed to mix and blend with the existing buildings in the area. The proposal would meet the City’s affordable housing policy to help provide additional affordable housing within the City. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed uses are all consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as MXC, Mixed Use Center. Uses contemplated within MXC include: Established or emerging mixed use districts serving areas larger than one neighborhood (and beyond city boundaries). Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Maintain existing, or create new, pedestrian and streetscape amenities; encourage or require structured parking. Buildings “step down” in height from intersections. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; It would be difficult to put retail into this project given the small lot size and lack of area for parking. Given the close proximity to retail use on all sides, the small lot size, a location on the Promenade, it is reasonable for this site to be a stand alone multi-family development. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned, a single land use is reasonable for this site given the small lot size and proximity to retail uses and public space. STAFF REPORT Page 15 iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As mentioned, the uses allowed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The densities allowed would be specifically stated in the PUD Ordinance. The density proposed is on the higher end than recent developments. However, given the surrounding open space (Promenade) and the large adjacent surface parking lots, the density would be acceptable. Additionally, the Spack Traffic study concludes that the surrounding roadways could support the use. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The table on page 6 shows how the proposed new buildings would comply with the PCD-3 Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in the new PUD-14 District. Flexibility is requested in regard to building height, setbacks, FAR and parking standard. In relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The area would be vastly improved by providing multi- family housing on the Promenade with pedestrian connections. The use will bring more vibrancy to the area. The building is high quality stone, brick, metal and glass. The applicant is providing a significant contribution to affordable housing, $1.86 million. Additionally the applicant is proposing some small 1-bedroom and Studio/Micro units. These smaller and very efficient units will provide a new housing option to the Edina marketplace. These micro units would generally range in size from 412 - 446 square feet and would be ideal for a college graduate, young professional, young couple returning home and looking for a new home, corporate transfers interested in Edina, single empty nesters and retired persons. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding height reasonable for this site, the Greater Southdale Area and the MXC, District? Yes. Staff believes the proposed amendment is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over nine-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying PCD-3 zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings nine-stories tall be setback six times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 218 feet; therefore a 1,308-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 1,450 feet, therefore is code compliant. STAFF REPORT Page 16 2. Building height is typically a function of Zoning and not a Comprehensive Plan requirement. 3. The City’s Zoning Ordinance was amended to reflect all heights recommended in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. 4. After June 30, 2018, the Metropolitan Council will no longer consider amendments to any 2008 Comprehensive Plan. That in effect, could put the City of Edina in a moratorium on development for a minimum of one year. Over the past 10 years in Edina, most re-development proposals in the Greater Southdale Area or in areas guided MXC, Mixed Use Center (50th & France and Grandview) have exceeded the Comprehensive Guide Plan designations for height, and have required a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. If the current 2018 Comprehensive Planning process remains on schedule (concluding in December of 2018), the earliest the Met Council would approve Edina’s Plan would be June of 2019. The Met Council requires a 6-month review process for themselves and adjacent cities. 5. In adopting this amendment for height, the City would not lose its regulatory controls in these areas as the City amended the Zoning Ordinance regarding height so that the Zoning Ordinance matches the Comprehensive Plan. 6. These changes would not impact the recent Small Area Plans at 44th and France, Valley View and Wooddale or 70th and Cahill. • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed density is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. Higher density would seem reasonable in the Greater Southdale area given the proximity to arterial roadways, France Avenue. The floor area ratio (FAR) allowed in this area is 1.5. The prosed FAR for this project is 6.5. FAR is not necessarily a good indicator of residential density; rather a more appropriate measure is units per acre. If you compare a retail or medical office development at an FAR of 1.5 (81,000 square feet of development), the amount of traffic generated from that size of a development would be greater than the housing project proposed. Therefore, staff believes that a residential density of 150 units an acre is appropriate in the MXC District. 2. If the adjacent Promenade were included in the overall development calculation the overall density would be 86 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. (See page 10 of this report.) STAFF REPORT Page 17 4. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. • Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site? Yes. Staff believes the PUD is justified for the following reasons: 1. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks (existing small lot); Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along Hazelton, and would provide a future connection to the Promenade along the north lot line. Provides additional public space adjacent to the Promenade. High quality buildings and design; Public art; Enhances the pedestrian experience along Hazelton Road and the Promenade. Affordable housing; 2. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. STAFF REPORT Page 18 f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. (See pages 13-15 of this report.) In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Creates a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality stone, brick, metal and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would contribute to the City’s Affordable Housing. Additionally, micro units would provide housing for a college graduate, young professional, young couple returning home and looking for a new home, corporate transfers interested in Edina, single empty nesters and retired persons. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 4. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. STAFF REPORT Page 19 Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the MXC, Mixed Use Center in the Greater Southdale Area from 100 units per acre to 150 units per acre; and Flexibility language to be included in the Comprehensive Plan to allow the City Council the flexibility to approve projects that would exceed the Comprehensive Plan height requirements in the Greater Southdale Area (Figure 4.6B) and the MXC, Mixed Use Center District through rezoning or variance. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The City’s Zoning Ordinance was amended to reflect all heights recommended in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan; therefore the City would not lose its regulatory control over height. 2. Building height is typically a function of Zoning regulations and not a Comprehensive Plan. 3. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over nine-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying PCD-3 zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings nine-stories tall be setback six times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 218 feet; therefore a 1,308-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 1,450 feet, therefore is code compliant. 4. These changes would not impact the recent Small Area Plans at 44th and France, Valley View and Wooddale or 70th and Cahill. 5. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed-use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 6. If the adjacent Promenade were included in the overall development calculation the overall density would be 86 units per acre. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District to PUD-14, Planned Unit Development District, including Preliminary Development Plan to construct the multi-family housing development at 3650 Hazelton Road. Approval is subject to the following findings: STAFF REPORT Page 20 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass. They are designed to mix and blend with the existing buildings in the area. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks (existing small lot); Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along Hazelton, and would provide a future connection to the Promenade along the north lot line. Provides additional public space adjacent to the Promenade. High quality buildings and design; Public art; Enhances the pedestrian experience along Hazelton Road and the Promenade. Affordable housing; 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. STAFF REPORT Page 21 f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. v. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. vi. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. vii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. viii. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Creates a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area, and enhance the experience in the district. b. The building would be of high quality stone, brick, metal and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would contribute to the City’s Affordable Housing. Additionally, micro units would provide housing for a college graduate, young professional, young couple returning home and looking for a new home, corporate transfers interested in Edina, single empty nesters and retired persons. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated February 16, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be STAFF REPORT Page 22 submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. A cash-in-lieu of affordable housing in the amount of $1.86 million dollars shall be contributed to the City for affordable housing. Payment shall be received prior to certificate of occupancy. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated March 21, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Spack Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-14, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding, height and density. Deadline for a city decision: June 5, 2018 DATE: March 21, 2018 TO: 3650 Hazelton Road, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner PE – Director of Engineering Charlie Gerk PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 3650 Hazelton Road – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Civil, Landscape, and Survey drawings dated 02/23/2018. Review Comment Required For General 1. Executed site improvement agreement that outlines public vs private responsibilities and ownership for private improvements on public property. Grading/Building Permit 1.1 Fulfill any requirements for rights to proceed with work. Grading/Building Permit 1.2 Fulfill all outstanding requirements. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Due to use of City property for storm water management, “Promenade Conceptual Design” landscaping design shown on sheet L1.0 shall be constructed, at developer’s expense, at the time of construction. Design to be coordinated with Parks Department. Developer, at their cost, will at the request of the City work with a landscape architect of the City’s choice. Grading/Building Permit 3. Proposed designs for private improvements on public property are considered conceptual only at this time. Design to be coordinated with Parks Department. Developer, at their cost, will at the request of the City work with a landscape architect of the City’s choice. Grading/Building Permit 4. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy Survey 5. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 5.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit 6. Clearly denote private sidewalk. Maintenance for non-public sidewalks to be responsibility of property owner. Grading/Building Permit 7. Clearly indicate private vs public utilities. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 8. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 9. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 10. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5’ in width with 5’ planted boulevard. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 11. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 12. Provide traffic study and implement city approved recommendations. Grading/Building Permit 13. Curb cut permit required for entrance movement / reconstruction. Prior to Reconstructing Entrance 14. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540-545. Certificate of Occupancy Sanitary and Water Utilities 15. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 16. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 17. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 18. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with public works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 18.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 18.2 Public works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 19. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. 20. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the city to calculate sewer and water connection charges Grading/Building Permit 21. Fire service should have a PIV or equivalent and the domestic line should have its own gate valve. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 22. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 23. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 24. Provide more detailed information for retention system. Grading/Building Permit 24.1 Ensure influence zone of infiltration chamber does not impact underground parking. Grading/Building Permit 24.2 Retention system engineer required to verify construction of the underground retention systems done per plan. Certificate of Occupancy 24.3 Confirm retention system is structural designed for Edina’s 80,000lb fire truck load and outriggers in parking lot areas. Grading/Building Permit 25. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 26. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site stormwater permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 27. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 28. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 29. Nine Mile Creek and / or Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts permit(s) are required. Grading/Building Permit i I hereby certify this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: _________________________ Bryant J. Ficek, P.E., P.T.O.E. License No. 42802 Date: Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Edina, Minnesota Traffic Impact Study i 3650 Hazelton Apartments Executive Summary Background: A residential redevelopment is proposed on the current site of the Guitar Center store, located in the northeast quadrant of the Hazelton Road roundabout intersection, between the France Avenue and York Avenue intersections in Edina, Minnesota. The purpose of this study is to determine the traffic impacts associated with the build out of the proposed redevelopment on the study roads and intersections where significant impact is anticipated. Results: The principal findings of this traffic study are: The proposed apartment development is expected to generate up to approximately 1,000 new trips during an average weekday, 69 new trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 89 new trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour. This traffic is more than the current site generates and will increase traffic in the area. The proposed redevelopment is expected to generate significantly less traffic compared to the maximum intensity use of the site. A 100,000 square-foot medical would be expected to generate approximately 3,480 daily, 278 a.m. peak hour, and 346 p.m. peak hour trips. All roadways in the study network are forecast to operate within capacity for the number of lanes provided. All study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably in terms of average delay through the build scenarios. Several individual approaches to the signalized intersections have longer delays or vehicle queues than desired. The redevelopment does not significantly change the operations in terms of overall intersection delays or individual approach results. The specific operations of the Auto Arrival Court are unknown. Specific concerns are providing adequate space for drop-offs/pick-ups and visitor parking as well as the service and loading area maneuvers. The site has multiple bicycle, pedestrian, and transit amenities surrounding it, with limited information shown in the site plan about how to connect the redevelopment to these amenities. The Edina Promenade crossing of Hazeltine Boulevard is classified as a low-risk crossing, has no crashes in the past five years, and has more-than-acceptable treatments for safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle crossings. Recommendations: The following items are recommended based on the analyses presented and the results of the study as summarized above: No roadway or traffic control mitigation is necessary to acceptably accommodate traffic expected from the residential redevelopment. However, the Hazelton Road intersections with France Avenue and with York Avenue should continue to be monitored. The City should continue to work with Hennepin County on proper timing for the France Avenue and York Avenue corridors, balancing the needs of the mainline with adequate access for the side streets. Operations of the Auto Arrival Court should be further explored with the developer. Specific pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding amenities should be identified along with plans for bicycle parking or other facilities. Consider striping and ADA treatments for the site access leg of the roundabout. Provide tenants with information regarding transit options as part of a move-in packet and explore the feasibility of a real-time transit screen. Traffic Impact Study ii 3650 Hazelton Apartments TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions .............................................................................. 2 3. Forecasted Traffic ................................................................................ 4 4. Analyses ............................................................................................... 6 5. Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................ 12 6. Appendix ............................................................................................. 14 LIST OF TABLES & CHARTS Table 1 – Study Corridor Characteristics ................................................. 2 Table 2 – New Trip Generation .................................................................. 4 Table 3 – Maximum Commercial Trip Generation .................................... 5 Chart 1 – Study Corridor Volume to Capacity .......................................... 6 Chart 2 – AM Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections .......... 7 Chart 3 – PM Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections .......... 8 Chart 4 – AM Peak Hour Delays: Roundabout-Controlled Intersections 8 Chart 5 – PM Peak Hour Delays: Roundabout-Controlled Intersections 9 Traffic Impact Study 1 3650 Hazelton Apartments 1. Introduction a. Proposed Development A new residential redevelopment is proposed on the current site of the Guitar Center store, located in the northeast quadrant of the Hazelton Road roundabout intersection, between the France Avenue and York Avenue intersections in Edina, Minnesota. Although the current site plan presented consists of 186 dwelling units in a 19-story tower, the actual number of units could be between 100 and 200. For the purposes of this study, the worst-case scenario of 200 units is evaluated. b. Purpose of Study The purpose of this study is to determine the traffic impacts associated with the build out of the proposed residential redevelopment. The traffic impacts are studied on the roads and intersections where significant impact is anticipated, and improvements are recommended where mitigation is needed. For those not familiar with the general concepts and terms associated with traffic engineering, The Language of Traffic Engineering guide is included in the Appendix. c. Study Objectives The objectives of this study are: i. Document how the study intersections and roadways currently operate. ii. Forecast the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development. iii. Determine how the study intersections and roadways will operate in the future with and without the proposed development. iv. Review the site circulation and multi-modal aspects. v. Recommend appropriate mitigation measures if poor operations or areas of concern are identified. The roadway corridors studied in this document include those surrounding the proposed site, which are: i. Hazelton Road ii. France Avenue iii. York Avenue The study intersections closest to the proposed development and where the greatest impact is expected were chosen for review and include: i. Hazelton Road and France Avenue ii. Hazelton Road and Site Driveway Roundabout iii. Hazelton Road and York Avenue For the purposes of this traffic study, the analysis year is 2020, representing the year after full build-out and occupancy expected in 2019. Traffic Impact Study 2 3650 Hazelton Apartments 2. Existing Conditions a. Corridor Characteristics As mentioned, the proposed redevelopment site is located on the north side of Hazelton Road. Figure 1 shows the vicinity of the site and the study area. Figure 2 shows the proposed site’s Concept Plan. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the key roadway corridors around the proposed site and within the study area. Table 1 – Study Corridor Characteristics Name Designation1 Classification2 Speed Limit Lanes Transit3 Peds/ Bicycles Hazelton Road MSAS 166 Collector 30 mph 2 divided (west of site) 4 undivided (east of site) 1 Route 20 Min. Sidewalks on both sides France Avenue CSAH 17 A-Minor Arterial Reliever 40 mph 6 divided 2 Routes 30 Min. Sidewalk on west Trail on east York Avenue CSAH 31 B-Minor Arterial 35 mph 4 divided 4 Routes 15 Min. Sidewalks on both sides 1 MSAS = Municipal State Aid Route, CSAH= County State Aid Highway 2 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan 3 Number of routes around the proposed site followed by the frequency of transit service during the peak periods. b. Traffic Volumes Intersection video was collected at each study intersection under normal weekday conditions in January 2018. Using these videos, 48-hour turning movement counts were obtained at the study intersections. The standard commuter peak hours for this area are 8:00 to 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. The turning movement counts from these two peak hours were used in the intersection analyses. The turning movement count data from the counts are contained in 15-minute intervals in the Appendix. Based on the turning movement volumes and the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s (MnDOT’s) Traffic Mapping Application, the current daily traffic volumes on each study corridor are: i. 30,000 vehicles per day on France Avenue ii. 19,300 vehicles per day on York Avenue north of Hazelton Road iii. 7,600 vehicles per day on Hazelton Road c. Non-Vehicular Traffic Ample pedestrian and bicycle facilities are present in the study area, with sidewalks/trails on both sides of York Avenue, France Avenue, and Hazelton Road, as well as a promenade crossing to the east of the site access roundabout. The Edina Promenade connects various retail, residential, and recreational amenities in the Southdale area. Traffic Impact Study 3 3650 Hazelton Apartments Pedestrian and bicycle activity was recorded with the vehicles at every intersection with crossing movements counted at each intersection. The heaviest non-motorized volume occurred at the Hazelton Road/York Avenue intersection, likely reflecting movements between the residential and commercial areas. MnDOT’s Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool was utilized to assess current pedestrian and bicycle safety on the study roads. From January 2006 to December 2015, three crashes occurred at the Hazelton Road/York Avenue intersection involving pedestrians or bicycles. All crashes were determined to be a result of the driver distraction or failure to yield right-out-way and none resulted in any incapacitating injury. Traffic Impact Study 4 3650 Hazelton Apartments 3. Forecasted Traffic a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the development site based on the methods published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Trip generation rates are provided in the same ITE manual as well as from local data collected by Spack Consulting. The ITE manual compiles studies from across the country to provide a national average traffic for various land uses. Spack Consulting collects current average traffic volumes for various land uses in the Twin Cities regional area for use in our studies. Local data is considered more relevant than the ITE national data as it is generally newer and accounts for our area’s specific characteristics and driving habits. Per the procedure in the Trip Generation Manual, local trip generation data is used when possible and supplemented with national ITE data when local data is not available. For each analysis, the raw trip generation was divided among three types of trips – new, pass-by, and internal. Pass-by trips are those vehicles already on the roads which will stop at the development site in the future. Internal trips are those vehicles within the site visiting two or more stores. New trips represent traffic increasing the overall number of vehicles at the intersections. For this study, with the proposed development being residential, all trips are treated as new. Table 2 shows the new trips generated by the proposed development. Table 2 – New Trip Generation Land Use Code – Source1 Description & Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out In Out 222 - ITE Multi-family Housing (high-rise) (200 dwelling units) 500 500 17 52 47 30 Local Apartment Building (200 dwelling units) 481 481 12 50 56 33 Trip Generation to Use 500 500 17 52 56 33 1 Local = Trip generation data collected by Spack Consulting in this regional area. As shown in Table 2, the ITE and Spack Consulting expected trip generation for the site is similar. To present a conservatively high analysis, the ITE data was used for the Daily and a.m. peak hour. The Spack Consulting data was used for the p.m. peak hour. The close correlation between the data indicates that the ITE data fits well within the Twin Cities region. For comparison purposes, Table 3 presents the trip generation assuming the maximum intensity of development for the site. In this case, the maximum intensity Traffic Impact Study 5 3650 Hazelton Apartments is a medical office of approximately 100,000 square feet. As shown, the proposed development has a much smaller traffic impact compared to the maximum use. Table 3 – Maximum Commercial Trip Generation Land Use Code – Source1 Description & Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out In Out 222 - ITE Multi-family Housing (high-rise) (200 dwelling units) 500 500 17 52 47 30 720 - ITE Medical Office (100,000 sq. ft.) 1,740 1,740 217 61 97 249 Difference 1,240 1,240 200 9 50 219 A trip distribution pattern was developed for the generated traffic of the proposed development. Based on existing counts as well as access to the regional transportation system, the general trip distribution pattern for this study is: i. 31% of the generated traffic to/from the north on France Avenue. ii. 31% of the generated traffic to/from the south on France Avenue. iii. 20% of the generated traffic to/from the north on York Avenue. iv. 17% of the generated traffic to/from the south on York Avenue. v. 1% of the generated traffic to/from the west on Hazelton Road. Traffic generated by the site development was assigned to the area roadways per this distribution pattern. b. Non-site Traffic Forecasting To forecast traffic volumes for the future years 2020 and 2023 beyond the proposed development’s traffic, general growth in traffic was added. Using MnDOT traffic data, the historic roadway volumes in the study area were examined. These volumes show relatively stable or decreasing volumes within the study area. In general, Edina could also be considered a relatively developed city expected to experience a lower growth rate. However, the France Avenue corridor is experiencing an increase in redevelopment. The 2016 Southdale Area Transportation Study was also consulted for expected growth in this area. From this information, a 1.0 percent annual growth rate was applied to the existing volumes to generate the forecast 2020 traffic volumes. This growth was applied to all existing movements in the study network to establish the No-Build forecasts. c. Total Traffic Traffic forecasts were developed for the 2020 Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development to the No-Build forecast volumes. The forecasted peak hour volumes for each study intersection are shown in the Appendix. Traffic Impact Study 6 3650 Hazelton Apartments 4. Analyses a. Corridor Vehicular Analysis While many factors contribute to a road feeling congested, the two biggest factors are volume, how many vehicles are using the road, and capacity, how many vehicles the road can accommodate per day. Transportation professionals use these pieces of information to create a ratio of volume to capacity. For example, a road with a volume to capacity ratio of 1.0, where the traffic demand is equal to the traffic supply, will feel congested to motorists. Below is a rough guide of the maximum daily traffic volumes different types of roads can accommodate based on the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition, Exhibit 16- 16. If the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on a roadway is below the threshold, then it is considered un-congested. If the daily volume is over the threshold, the road is near congestion or is congested. The range in volumes reflect different characteristics such as having exclusive turn lanes, intersection traffic control like signals, and proper access spacing. All study roads would be expected to be at the higher end of these volume ranges for their number of lanes. 2-Lane Roads; volumes between 8,900 to 18,300 vehicles per day. 4-Lane Roads; volumes between 18,600 and 36,800 vehicles per day. 6-Lane Roads; volumes between 29,100 and 55,300 vehicles per day. For an initial planning level screening, Chart 1 provides volume to capacity ratios of the study corridors to determine if any of the roadway corridors are candidates for additional through lanes. As shown, the study roads are all below the planning threshold. In addition, the proposed redevelopment does not significantly change the volume-to-capacity ratios. Chart 1 – Study Corridor Volume to Capacity Congested: volume/capacity of 1.0 or greater 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 Hazelton Road France Avenue York Avenue Vo l u me t o C a p a c i t y R a t i o Existing 2020 No-Build 2020 Future Build Traffic Impact Study 7 3650 Hazelton Apartments b. Intersection Vehicular Analysis Individual intersections can perform poorly during peak periods while the overall roadway corridor is operating with an uncongested daily volume to capacity ratio lower than 1.0. Therefore, capacity analyses are performed for the study intersections to determine if they need improvements, such as turn lanes or an upgrade in traffic control. The existing and forecasted turning movement volumes along with the existing intersection configurations and traffic control were used to develop the average delay per intersection in each study scenario. The delay calculations were done in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition using the Vistro software package. The full calculations for each study scenario, including Level of Service (LOS) grades and queue lengths, are included in the Appendix. Also included in the Appendix is a guide explaining the Level of Service grade concept. Chart 2 (a.m. peak hour) and Chart 3 (p.m. peak hour) show the average peak hour delay per traffic signal-controlled intersection for each study scenario. The LOS D/E boundary of 55 seconds of delay per vehicle is considered the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable traffic signal operation in Minnesota. Chart 2 – AM Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (55 seconds) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 France Avenue & Hazelton Road York Avenue & Hazelton Road Av er a g e D e a l y ( s e c o n d s ) Existing 2020 No Build 2020 Build Traffic Impact Study 8 3650 Hazelton Apartments Chart 3 – PM Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections Chart 4 (a.m. peak hour) and Chart 5 (p.m. peak hour) show the average peak hour delay per all-way stop intersection for each study scenario. The LOS D/E boundary of 35 seconds of delay per vehicle is considered the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable all-way stop operation in Minnesota. Chart 4 – AM Peak Hour Delays: Roundabout-Controlled Intersections Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (55 seconds) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 France Avenue & Hazelton Road York Avenue & Hazelton Road Av er a g e D e a l y ( s e c o n d s ) Existing 2020 No Build 2020 Build Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (35 seconds) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Hazelton Road Roundabout Av er a g e D e a l y ( s e c o n d s ) Existing 2020 No Build 2020 Build Traffic Impact Study 9 3650 Hazelton Apartments Chart 5 – PM Peak Hour Delays: Roundabout-Controlled Intersections As shown in the charts, the study intersections are forecasted to operate with overall acceptable delay through the Build scenario in both the a.m. and p.m. peak hour scenarios. In addition, the overall delays show little change between the existing and Build scenarios, suggesting the proposed development will not significantly impact operations. At the signalized intersections, some approaches show longer delays and/or vehicle queuing than desired in all scenarios. Specifically, the northbound and southbound left turn movements on both France Avenue and York Avenue as well as the westbound approach on France Avenue and eastbound approach on York Avenue. These areas of potential concern match the results of the Southdale Area Transportation Study. The proposed development does not significantly change results for these approaches, increasing the 95th percentile vehicle queue length by only one vehicle. These approaches should continue to be monitored with other future development in the area. The City should also continue to work with the County on signal timing for the France Avenue and York Avenue corridors. Signal timing should be reviewed every few years or with significant development to ensure the timing reflects the current driving patterns. Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (35 seconds) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Hazelton Road Roundabout Av er a g e D e a l y ( s e c o n d s ) Existing 2020 No Build 2020 Build Traffic Impact Study 10 3650 Hazelton Apartments c. Site Plan & Multi-Modal Review The concept site plan contained in the Appendix was reviewed for potential improvements to the circulation and connection of the multi-modal system. The following are the key categories reviewed and highlights of that review: i. Vehicle Circulation: The site uses the existing access from the roundabout, with all traffic entering onto the Auto Arrival Court. This approximately 55-foot by 65-foot square provides access to the underground garage as well as a service and loading area. The Auto Arrival Court has a potential concern in regard to drop-offs/pick-ups. The relatively small area could become congested quickly with only a handful of cars. The service and loading area is also relatively small with a one-lane dead end. Cars or trucks would likely need to back out in the Auto Arrival Court, which increases the risk for any pedestrian in this area. Visitor parking is not marked on the site plan and will need to be identified. More information regarding the circulation and operation expected for visitors, drop-offs/pick- ups, and trucks is necessary. ii. Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure: As mentioned, sidewalks, trails, and the Edina Promenade surround this site providing non-motorized alternatives for reaching other destinations. The site plan shows a sidewalk connection from the ground-level townhomes to the promenade. However, no connection is shown to the lobby, either directly or to the sidewalk on Hazelton Road. This connection should be provided to improve access for all residents. Consideration should also be given to striping the crossing of the site access at the roundabout, formalizing the pedestrian crossings. Upgrading the crossing with full ADA treatments may also be needed. Bicycle facilities are likewise missing from the provided site plan. Ideally, outside short-term bicycle parking would be provided near the front door for residents and guests. Indoor long-term bicycle parking could be provided in the parking garage either at individual stalls or in a bicycle parking room. Other amenities, such as a maintenance stand, would increase the likelihood of bicycle trips, reducing vehicle travel on the roads. All bicycle parking and amenities should be convenient to the entrances and in well-lit locations for safety and visibility. iii. Edina Promenade Crossing of Hazeltine Boulevard: The Edina Promenade is an 80-foot wide greenway through the Southdale area, connecting retail, residential, and recreational amenities via pedestrian and bicycle paths. Just east of the proposed site access, the promenade crosses Hazeltine Boulevard. This crossing provides standard crosswalk pavement markings, advanced pedestrian crossing warning signs, overhead pedestrian and bicycle warning signs at the crossing, and a push- button activated overhead flasher to further notify approaching drivers of a pedestrian or bicycle crossing. Traffic Impact Study 11 3650 Hazelton Apartments iv. Using information from the Minnesota Local Road Research Board (LRRB) and MnDOT standard practices, the key characteristics of a crossing include the number of pedestrian crossings, the number of driving lanes, the average daily vehicle traffic, the speed limit of the road, and the sight distance. For this crossing, these characteristics are: Pedestrian Volume; not specifically counted, but assumed over 20 crossings in one hour to indicate high use. Number of Driving Lanes; Hazeltine Boulevard is a two-lane road in the area of this crossing. Average Daily Traffic; as counted for this study, Hazeltine Boulevard has approximately 7,600 vehicles per day, which is less than the high volume threshold of 9,000 vehicles per day. Speed Limit; the posted speed limit on Hazeltine Boulevard is 30- mph, which is low speed for the purposes of this analysis. The roundabout just west of the crossing also slows the eastbound traffic approaching the crossing. Sight Distance; Pedestrian and drivers are able to see each other from the roundabout to the west of the crossing (about 200 feet away, which provides traffic calming to slow vehicle speeds) and over 300 feet to the east of the crossing. Both distance are acceptable in terms of driver stopping sight distance and pedestrian sight distance. In addition to these characteristics, Hazeltine Boulevard has a center median at this crossing. Pedestrians and bicycles are therefore able to cross one direction of traffic at a time, increasing the safety of the crossing and the comfort level for pedestrians and bicyclists. The Edina Promenade crossing of Hazeltine Boulevard is classified as a low risk location based on this information. Furthermore, an analysis of crashes at the crossing location shows that there were no accidents involving pedestrians within the five years, which reaffirms Hazelton’s low risk classification. For low risk crossings, standard crosswalk treatment is a marked crosswalk with optional warning signs. As the current crossing provides more than suggested for this type of crossing and the crash history confirms its low-risk status, the crossing is currently safe by today’s standards and requires no additional treatments. Adjacent Transit: Bus stops are within walking distance on Hazelton Road, France Avenue, and York Avenue with direct or indirect travel to the Minneapolis and Saint Paul downtowns and other areas. Transit information is recommended to be provided to tenants to inform them of their options, potentially as part of a move-in packet. Real-time transit screens could be explored for the lobby. These screens display the latest, most accurate information, replace printed bulletin board flyers, and are a visible reminder of the transit option. Metro Transit is a willing partner for the developer to further explore this option. Traffic Impact Study 12 3650 Hazelton Apartments 5. Conclusions and Recommendations The traffic impacts of the proposed residential redevelopment were studied, and the principal findings are: The proposed apartment development is expected to generate up to approximately 1,000 new trips during an average weekday, 69 new trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour and 89 new trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour. This traffic is more than the current site generates and will increase traffic in the area. The proposed redevelopment is expected to generate significantly less traffic compared to the maximum intensity use of the site. A 100,000 square-foot medical would be expected to generate approximately 3,480 daily trips, 278 a.m. peak hour trips, and 346 p.m. peak hour trips. All roadways in the study network are forecast to operate within capacity for the number of lanes provided. All study intersections are forecast to operate acceptably in terms of average delay through the build scenarios. Several individual approaches to the signalized intersections have longer delays or vehicle queues than desired. The redevelopment does not significantly change the operations in terms of overall intersection delays or individual approach results. The specific operations of the Auto Arrival Court are unknown. Specific concerns are providing adequate space for drop-offs/pick-ups and visitor parking as well as the service and loading area maneuvers. The site has multiple bicycle, pedestrian, and transit amenities surrounding it, with limited information shown in the site plan about how to connect the redevelopment to these amenities. The Edina Promenade crossing of Hazeltine Boulevard is classified as a low-risk crossing, has no crashes in the past five years, and has more-than-acceptable treatments (single lane crossing with center median refuge, marking crosswalk, advanced and overhead warning signs, and push-button activated overhead flashers) for safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle crossings. The following is recommended based on the analyses presented and the results of the study as summarized above: No roadway or traffic control mitigation is necessary to acceptably accommodate traffic expected from the residential redevelopment. However, the Hazelton Road intersections with France Avenue and with York Avenue should continue to be monitored (specifically the northbound and southbound left turn movements as well as the westbound approach at France Avenue and eastbound approach at York Avenue). Traffic Impact Study 13 3650 Hazelton Apartments The City should continue to work with Hennepin County on proper timing for the France Avenue and York Avenue corridors, balancing the needs of the mainline with adequate access for the side streets. Operations of the Auto Arrival Court should be further explored with the developer, identifying the specifics for various types of passenger and truck traffic in addition to avoiding or minimizing conflicts with pedestrians or bicyclists travelling to the front door. Specific pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding amenities should be identified along with plans for bicycle parking or other facilities. Short-term (outside) and long-term (inside) bicycle parking may be needed and should be convenient to entrances and well-lit for visibility and safety. Consider striping and ADA treatments for the site access leg of the roundabout. Provide tenants with information regarding transit options as part of a move-in packet and explore the feasibility of a real-time transit screen to increase visibility of the transit option and provide the most up-to-date information. Traffic Impact Study 14 3650 Hazelton Apartments 6. Appendix A. Site Plan B. The Language of Traffic Engineering C. Traffic Counts D. Level of Service (LOS) E. Capacity Analysis Backup AM Existing PM Existing AM 2020 No Build PM 2020 No Build AM 2020 Build PM 2020 Build Figure 1 Location Maps Proposed Site Study Area North No Scale Proposed Site Appendix A: Figures A1 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting 1 1 ' - 0 " 2 0, 2 0 5 SF P ar k i n g 1 8' - 0 " T ra s h / Re c y c l i n g 0 ' -5 ' U p D ow n +5 ' 1 62 ' - 0 " 7 69 S F T H 7 13 S F TH 7 13 S F TH 6 56 S F TH 7 13 S F TH -5' 4 ,3 2 3 S F L ob b y 5 88 S F A lc o v e 1 ,6 4 0 S F Ar e a S er v i c e an d Lo a d i n g 2 ' - 6 " 2 0' - 0 " A ut o Ar r i v a l Co u r t 2 8 ' - 0 " P LAN NORTH S cale:1" = 30'-0"L und Edina S treet Level Plan De c e m b e r 5 , 2 0 1 7 3 650 Hazelton Road Ap p e n d i x A : F i g u r e s A2 Tr a f f i c I m p a c t S t u d y 36 5 0 H a z e l t o n A p a r t m e n t s R e d e v e l o p m e n t Spack ConsultingFigure 2 Site Plans Research Brief — Volume No. 15 The Language of Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineering, and Traffic Engineers, often use technical terms or jargon that may be confusing or tough to understand even within the context of a sentence. Key terms and acronyms that can generally be found in all types of traffic studies are defined in this document. Types of Studies Access Management – The practice of government agencies limiting the amount of intersections (both public roadway crossings and private driveways) along a roadway corridor based on the function of the roadway to improve safety and mobility while streamlining access. Corridor Study – A transportation review and analysis of the existing and future traffic operations of a roadway segment. Varies in length from a couple blocks to a few miles and typically covers all modes of travel. Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Report – A document that examines and determines the most appropriate type of control (stop sign, signal, roundabout, or other) at one or more intersections. Safety Study – An examination of crash records to identify potential trends, issues, and problem intersections/ corridors. Usually includes potential mitigation options expected to decrease crash rates in the future. Speed Study – A review of existing travel speeds and the corridor characteristics to determine if speeding is an issue, the appropriate speed to post as the limit, and/or areas to provide reduced speed warnings. Traffic Impact Study (TIS) – A document that addresses the expected traffic impacts of a development and, if necessary, mitigation options that will reduce or eliminate negative impacts. Also referred to as a Traffic Impact Analysis. Transportation Plan – A document developed by a government agency to take inventory of their transportation network, identify concerns or issues and lay out the path for improvement of the system. Travel Demand Management Plan (TDMP) – A plan that documents the existing infrastructure around a site, including transit and non-motorized vehicle options, and develops measures to be implemented to encourage those alternative modes of travel. Warrant Evaluation – Review of traffic volumes and other characteristics at an intersection against thresholds to determine if a traffic signal or other traffic control option is needed/warranted. Key Organizations AASHTO – American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. A nonprofit, nonpartisan association representing transportation departments with a primary goal of fostering the development, operation, and maintenance of an integrated national transportation system. DOT – Department of Transportation. Government organizations within federal and state agencies dedicated to serving the transportation needs of the community and typically responsible for study, design, operation, and maintenance of all facets of transportation. FHWA – Federal Highway Administration. An agency within the US Department of Transportation that supports State and local governments in the design, construction, and maintenance of the highway system. ITE – Institute of Transportation Engineers. An international educational and scientific association of transportation professionals who are responsible for meeting mobility and safety needs. Traffic Engineering is a branch of civil engineering that focuses on the safe and efficient movement of people and vehicles. It is part science and part art, requiring not only technical skills for analysis but an understanding of motivations in choosing travel routes. Source: ETH Zurich Appendix B: The Language of Traffic Engineering Traffic Impact Study Chanhassen Panera Development SiteTraffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment B1 Spack Consulting Resources MUTCD, 2009 Edition, published by FHWA Highway Capacity Manual, HCM2010 Highway Safety Manual, HSM About This Brief Spack Consulting prepared this brief as part of our company’s vision to significantly improve the practice of traffic engineering and transportation planning. Transportation professionals from around the world have assisted us in developing this document. We are providing this brief under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Feel free to use-modify-share this guide, but please give us some credit in your document. To request our whole series of Design Briefs and to be included on our distribution list for new materials, please email mspack@spackconsulting.com. And please reach out if you have any comments or questions related to this Design Brief. Research Brief — Volume No. 15 Important Manuals/Guides HCM – Highway Capacity Manual (released by the Transportation Research Board, or TRB). The guide for engineers and planners to assess traffic and environmental effects of highway projects. This manual presents the foundation of traffic analysis procedures in the US. MUTCD – Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A document that sets minimum standards and provides guidance to ensure uniformity of traffic control devices (such as messages, location, size, shapes, and colors) across the nation. All roads are subject to its jurisdiction. HSM – Highway Safety Manual (released by AASHTO). A guide that presents a variety of methods for quantitatively estimating crash frequency or severity. Results 85th Percentile Speed – Speed at which 85 percent of drivers are traveling at or below. Speed limits are typically set at the 85th percentile speed. 95th Percentile Queue – The distance, generally measured in feet or number of vehicles, which will be exceeded in a lane, typically at an intersection, only five percent of the time. Usually used to help determine intersection turn lane lengths. Control Delay – The total amount of time a motorist takes to get through a road segment or intersection minus the time it would take without stopping due to traffic controls (like stop signs or traffic signals). Control delay includes decelerating and accelerating back to full driving speed. Functional Classification – the grouping of streets and highways into categories according to their characteristics and emphasis on mobility or access. Generally, categories include arterials (emphasizing mobility and fast travel), local roads (emphasizing access to adjoining properties), and collector roads (emphasizing a balance between the two and usually connecting arterials to local roads). Intersection Delay – The average amount of time, usually expressed in seconds, experienced by any vehicle traveling through an intersection. Level of Service (LOS) – Qualitative measure of traffic operations related to the amount of average delay experienced. Expressed in letter grades with LOS A representing the best operations with little to no delay and LOS F representing the worst operations with excessive delays and congestion. Measures of Effectiveness – Performance measures that define how well traffic is moving along a corridor or thru an intersection. The common MOEs are travel time, corridor speed, delay, and queues. Mitigation – Measures intended to reduce the impact of a development or improve an identified traffic issue by either improving capacity (like adding lanes) or reducing demand (like encouraging carpooling). Queue – Length of line of cars waiting at an intersection or at a bottleneck in a corridor, typically measured for each individual lane of traffic in feet or number of vehicles. Volume to Capacity (v/c) ratio – the number of vehicles through an intersection or roadway segment in a specific amount of time divided by the expected capacity of the road. Less than 1.0 indicates available capacity and above 1.0 indicates more vehicles than can be accommodated. Typically, a v/c ratio above 0.85 suggests operational issues. Trip Generation – The amount of vehicle traffic generated by a land use. One trip is equal to one vehicle traveling from an origin to a destination (traveling to and from work equals two trips). Warrants – Criteria based on volumes and other Measures of Effectiveness for determining when all way stop signs, roundabouts, traffic signals, or other type of control should be installed. Appendix B: The Language of Traffic Engineering Traffic Impact Study Chanhassen Panera Development SiteTraffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment B2 Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 12:00 AM 0 0 14 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 12:15 AM 0 0 9 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12:30 AM 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 12:45 AM 0 0 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 Hourly Total 0 0 43 1 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 0 36 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 96 1:00 AM 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 1:15 AM 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1:30 AM 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 13 1:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Hourly Total 0 0 23 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 17 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 46 2:00 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2:15 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2:30 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2:45 AM 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Hourly Total 0 2 11 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 3:00 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 3:15 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 3:30 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3:45 AM 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 Hourly Total 0 3 11 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 37 4:00 AM 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 4:15 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4:30 AM 0 1 10 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 23 4:45 AM 0 8 5 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 18 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 40 Hourly Total 0 11 23 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 33 6 0 0 1 1 0 0 80 5:00 AM 0 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 29 5:15 AM 0 6 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 3 0 0 1 1 0 1 45 5:30 AM 0 13 11 1 0 1 4 0 3 0 0 1 26 14 0 0 1 2 1 0 78 5:45 AM 0 13 32 5 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 33 7 0 0 0 1 1 0 96 Hourly Total 0 35 68 7 0 1 5 1 5 0 0 3 86 25 0 0 2 5 3 2 248 6:00 AM 0 14 35 3 0 0 6 0 5 0 0 2 12 7 0 0 4 2 1 0 91 6:15 AM 0 10 56 1 0 0 7 1 7 0 1 1 15 7 1 0 1 3 1 0 112 6:30 AM 0 15 65 0 1 0 13 0 12 0 0 1 75 10 1 0 2 3 0 0 198 6:45 AM 0 24 101 0 0 0 12 1 7 0 0 0 104 11 0 0 1 2 3 1 267 Hourly Total 0 63 257 4 1 0 38 2 31 0 1 4 206 35 2 0 8 10 5 1 668 7:00 AM 0 22 100 4 0 0 9 0 15 0 0 1 104 15 0 0 1 2 0 0 273 7:15 AM 0 22 143 1 0 0 11 2 7 0 0 2 122 17 0 0 2 0 0 0 329 7:30 AM 0 33 180 0 0 1 11 1 6 0 2 2 117 9 0 0 0 4 3 1 370 7:45 AM 0 28 231 2 1 0 16 2 19 0 1 1 167 12 0 0 6 2 3 0 491 Hourly Total 0 105 654 7 1 1 47 5 47 0 3 6 510 53 0 0 9 8 6 1 1463 Hazelton Rd & France Ave Edina, Minnesota Tuesday, January 9, 2018 TOTAL Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound France Ave Hazelton Rd France Ave Hazelton Rd Appendix C: Traffic Counts C1 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 8:00 AM 1 23 226 1 1 0 19 4 10 0 1 1 158 24 0 0 1 3 3 1 477 8:15 AM 0 31 213 3 1 2 18 2 14 0 2 2 153 22 2 0 3 1 0 1 470 8:30 AM 0 30 221 2 0 2 23 1 19 0 4 1 155 17 0 0 0 4 0 0 479 8:45 AM 1 45 227 4 0 1 21 2 18 0 0 0 182 33 1 0 3 1 1 0 540 Hourly Total 2 129 887 10 2 5 81 9 61 0 7 4 648 96 3 0 7 9 4 2 1966 9:00 AM 0 46 183 2 0 1 18 2 19 0 2 2 178 33 0 0 4 1 1 0 492 9:15 AM 1 48 212 3 0 0 25 3 14 0 2 2 169 34 2 0 2 7 1 2 527 9:30 AM 0 40 183 1 0 0 16 3 20 0 2 1 183 30 0 0 2 1 2 0 484 9:45 AM 1 38 190 3 0 0 22 2 17 1 1 5 193 45 1 0 1 2 0 1 523 Hourly Total 2 172 768 9 0 1 81 10 70 1 7 10 723 142 3 0 9 11 4 3 2026 10:00 AM 0 34 161 6 2 0 25 2 21 2 2 3 190 27 0 0 3 2 2 0 482 10:15 AM 1 37 208 2 0 0 25 4 27 1 1 0 199 34 0 0 5 8 1 0 553 10:30 AM 1 41 180 8 0 0 32 4 34 0 2 4 218 35 1 0 2 8 1 0 571 10:45 AM 3 39 239 2 0 0 35 1 34 0 1 0 259 44 1 0 1 1 0 0 660 Hourly Total 5 151 788 18 2 0 117 11 116 3 6 7 866 140 2 0 11 19 4 0 2266 11:00 AM 1 47 199 7 0 0 41 4 38 1 2 4 222 49 0 0 4 4 3 0 626 11:15 AM 3 52 245 3 0 1 37 4 39 1 4 4 309 50 1 0 6 2 6 0 767 11:30 AM 2 46 213 3 0 1 46 4 45 1 4 4 277 45 2 0 5 3 5 0 706 11:45 AM 1 76 246 1 0 1 53 5 30 0 2 1 303 42 0 0 6 2 4 0 773 Hourly Total 7 221 903 14 0 3 177 17 152 3 12 13 1111 186 3 0 21 11 18 0 2872 12:00 PM 1 78 234 2 0 0 43 4 44 0 3 3 295 64 0 0 4 3 4 0 782 12:15 PM 1 57 227 2 0 1 44 4 52 0 4 2 277 53 2 0 1 3 3 0 733 12:30 PM 4 71 274 5 0 0 55 2 52 2 5 5 293 58 0 0 2 3 3 0 834 12:45 PM 0 58 271 6 0 2 44 5 58 0 4 4 284 46 1 0 4 4 4 1 796 Hourly Total 6 264 1006 15 0 3 186 15 206 2 16 14 1149 221 3 0 11 13 14 1 3145 1:00 PM 0 50 257 5 0 0 57 5 36 0 5 1 235 39 0 0 3 3 2 0 698 1:15 PM 3 49 306 2 0 0 41 5 46 0 3 3 266 54 0 0 0 1 1 0 780 1:30 PM 1 45 283 3 0 2 35 6 43 1 5 0 259 44 1 0 0 4 3 1 736 1:45 PM 0 55 231 4 1 1 43 0 49 2 3 4 291 47 3 0 2 4 5 1 746 Hourly Total 4 199 1077 14 1 3 176 16 174 3 16 8 1051 184 4 0 5 12 11 2 2960 2:00 PM 1 51 239 3 2 1 43 5 42 0 2 2 288 52 0 0 7 8 4 2 752 2:15 PM 0 45 237 0 0 0 34 3 56 1 3 6 278 41 1 0 5 6 2 1 719 2:30 PM 0 44 204 1 0 0 47 1 50 0 3 12 238 32 0 0 4 4 1 0 641 2:45 PM 0 55 260 2 0 1 46 6 52 1 2 2 269 39 0 0 1 3 1 0 740 Hourly Total 1 195 940 6 2 2 170 15 200 2 10 22 1073 164 1 0 17 21 8 3 2852 3:00 PM 1 38 259 1 0 1 29 9 45 1 1 3 285 32 0 0 5 5 2 0 717 3:15 PM 0 42 224 3 1 3 33 4 47 1 1 1 272 33 1 0 2 4 2 1 675 3:30 PM 1 38 276 4 1 0 25 4 25 1 4 3 312 30 2 0 2 7 6 0 741 3:45 PM 4 35 233 3 0 0 34 3 43 0 3 0 267 42 0 0 4 6 3 0 680 Hourly Total 6 153 992 11 2 4 121 20 160 3 9 7 1136 137 3 0 13 22 13 1 2813 France Ave Hazelton Rd Hazelton Rd & France Ave Edina, Minnesota Tuesday, January 9, 2018 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTALFrance Ave Hazelton Rd Appendix C: Traffic Counts C2 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 4:00 PM 0 44 291 2 0 0 23 5 41 1 2 0 314 40 2 0 5 4 0 0 774 4:15 PM 1 35 237 1 0 0 33 6 32 0 0 2 310 53 2 0 4 3 1 0 720 4:30 PM 1 51 237 3 0 0 32 5 42 0 2 2 328 38 1 0 7 8 3 1 761 4:45 PM 0 37 236 1 0 0 36 8 44 0 0 0 322 51 1 0 3 7 1 1 748 Hourly Total 2 167 1001 7 0 0 124 24 159 1 4 4 1274 182 6 0 19 22 5 2 3003 5:00 PM 1 40 222 5 0 0 41 5 41 1 1 2 336 47 1 0 3 9 1 0 756 5:15 PM 1 36 261 4 1 0 40 5 39 0 5 4 328 40 1 0 3 7 2 0 777 5:30 PM 1 43 224 5 0 1 30 4 38 0 2 3 283 41 2 0 3 4 1 0 685 5:45 PM 1 39 192 0 0 2 38 7 46 0 2 4 264 41 0 0 2 4 2 0 644 Hourly Total 4 158 899 14 1 3 149 21 164 1 10 13 1211 169 4 0 11 24 6 0 2862 6:00 PM 1 36 227 0 0 0 26 2 28 0 0 2 297 36 0 0 3 5 1 0 664 6:15 PM 1 40 197 2 0 0 30 3 32 0 2 3 251 40 0 0 4 7 2 0 614 6:30 PM 3 26 148 2 0 0 32 2 31 0 1 1 204 35 1 0 3 2 0 0 491 6:45 PM 0 24 159 1 0 2 28 4 22 1 1 0 204 46 0 0 4 2 1 0 499 Hourly Total 5 126 731 5 0 2 116 11 113 1 4 6 956 157 1 0 14 16 4 0 2268 7:00 PM 0 34 143 4 0 1 32 7 28 0 2 1 194 30 0 0 5 6 0 0 487 7:15 PM 1 31 148 0 0 0 30 2 25 0 4 0 173 26 0 0 1 2 0 0 443 7:30 PM 0 17 147 2 0 0 27 2 14 0 0 3 168 22 0 0 1 0 1 0 404 7:45 PM 0 15 132 0 0 0 18 2 25 0 3 0 125 25 0 0 1 1 1 0 348 Hourly Total 1 97 570 6 0 1 107 13 92 0 9 4 660 103 0 0 8 9 2 0 1682 8:00 PM 0 13 140 0 0 0 26 0 25 0 1 0 117 19 0 0 3 1 0 0 345 8:15 PM 0 17 128 2 0 0 20 4 20 0 1 2 116 22 0 0 0 1 1 0 334 8:30 PM 0 16 102 1 0 1 14 0 22 0 1 0 99 21 1 0 2 0 0 0 280 8:45 PM 1 6 103 0 0 0 19 1 13 0 1 0 71 15 1 0 2 1 0 0 234 Hourly Total 1 52 473 3 0 1 79 5 80 0 4 2 403 77 2 0 7 3 1 0 1193 9:00 PM 0 13 92 0 0 0 22 4 18 0 0 1 84 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 247 9:15 PM 0 7 113 1 1 0 17 2 9 0 0 0 63 12 1 0 0 2 0 0 228 9:30 PM 0 6 65 1 0 0 15 0 4 0 0 0 51 10 0 0 2 2 0 0 156 9:45 PM 1 7 59 0 0 0 13 0 3 0 0 2 55 11 2 0 2 0 1 0 156 Hourly Total 1 33 329 2 1 0 67 6 34 0 0 3 253 45 4 0 4 4 1 0 787 10:00 PM 0 7 43 2 0 0 9 1 6 0 0 0 42 8 0 0 4 1 0 0 123 10:15 PM 0 1 42 1 0 0 7 0 5 0 0 0 44 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 105 10:30 PM 0 0 37 1 0 0 7 3 4 0 0 1 32 9 0 0 2 2 2 0 100 10:45 PM 0 6 19 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 26 4 0 0 1 1 1 0 66 Hourly Total 0 14 141 4 0 0 28 4 18 0 0 1 144 25 0 0 7 4 4 0 394 11:00 PM 0 2 12 0 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 11:15 PM 0 1 23 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 17 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 11:30 PM 0 0 19 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 33 11:45 PM 0 1 16 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Hourly Total 0 4 70 2 0 0 12 0 9 0 1 0 41 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 147 DAILY TOTAL 47 2354 12665 160 14 31 1893 205 1902 20 119 134 13612 2164 41 0 185 224 116 19 35905 Cars 47 2325 12498 158 14 31 1822 203 1882 18 119 130 13441 2082 41 0 185 220 112 17 35345 Heavy Vehicles 0 29 167 2 0 0 71 2 20 2 0 4 171 82 0 0 0 4 4 2 560 Heavy Vehicle %0.00%1.23%1.32%1.25%0.00%0.00%3.75%0.98%1.05%10.00%0.00%2.99%1.26%3.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.79%3.45%10.53%1.56% TOTALFrance Ave Hazelton Rd France Ave Hazelton Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Hazelton Rd & France Ave Edina, Minnesota Tuesday, January 9, 2018 Appendix C: Traffic Counts C3 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 12:00 AM 0 0 11 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12:15 AM 0 2 16 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 12:30 AM 0 1 11 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 12:45 AM 0 1 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Hourly Total 0 4 48 0 0 0 6 0 4 0 1 0 35 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 1:00 AM 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 1:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1:30 AM 0 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 1:45 AM 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Hourly Total 0 1 16 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 2:00 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2:15 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 2:45 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Hourly Total 0 0 13 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 3:00 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3:15 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3:30 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 3:45 AM 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 Hourly Total 0 1 11 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 1 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33 4:00 AM 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 4:15 AM 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 4:30 AM 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 20 4:45 AM 0 5 6 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 15 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 34 Hourly Total 0 8 23 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 1 0 29 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 75 5:00 AM 0 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 36 5:15 AM 0 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 5:30 AM 0 9 16 2 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 29 8 2 0 0 1 0 0 73 5:45 AM 0 7 34 3 0 0 2 1 1 0 1 2 29 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 95 Hourly Total 0 19 82 5 0 0 6 1 3 0 1 3 89 23 2 0 2 5 1 0 242 6:00 AM 1 9 39 2 0 0 4 0 2 0 1 2 39 5 0 0 5 1 0 0 110 6:15 AM 1 10 57 2 0 0 9 0 7 0 0 2 48 14 0 0 2 1 0 0 153 6:30 AM 0 13 74 3 0 0 14 0 11 0 0 0 81 11 0 0 1 3 0 0 211 6:45 AM 1 27 81 0 0 0 9 2 12 0 1 1 93 11 0 0 0 2 1 0 241 Hourly Total 3 59 251 7 0 0 36 2 32 0 2 5 261 41 0 0 8 7 1 0 715 7:00 AM 1 18 90 3 0 0 6 3 7 0 0 1 93 10 1 0 2 2 0 0 237 7:15 AM 0 13 134 1 0 0 12 0 9 0 1 0 124 10 0 0 3 3 1 0 311 7:30 AM 0 30 179 1 1 1 18 1 7 0 0 0 111 16 0 0 2 1 1 1 370 7:45 AM 0 27 240 4 0 0 17 1 20 0 2 3 145 11 0 0 2 4 1 0 477 Hourly Total 1 88 643 9 1 1 53 5 43 0 3 4 473 47 1 0 9 10 3 1 1395 Hazelton Rd & France Ave Edina, Minnesota Wednesday, January 10, 2018 TOTAL Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound France Ave Hazelton Rd France Ave Hazelton Rd Appendix C: Traffic Counts C4 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 8:00 AM 0 28 225 0 0 0 19 1 13 0 0 1 133 17 0 0 1 4 1 0 443 8:15 AM 0 42 222 3 0 0 15 3 15 0 3 0 157 14 1 0 4 3 0 0 482 8:30 AM 1 43 219 3 0 0 17 1 18 0 0 0 149 16 0 0 2 1 0 0 470 8:45 AM 2 26 237 5 0 0 20 5 14 0 0 3 157 31 2 0 1 3 0 0 506 Hourly Total 3 139 903 11 0 0 71 10 60 0 3 4 596 78 3 0 8 11 1 0 1901 9:00 AM 0 35 177 4 0 0 20 3 20 0 3 3 181 24 0 0 1 5 3 2 481 9:15 AM 1 40 191 3 0 1 20 2 18 0 0 2 188 31 0 0 3 4 0 1 505 9:30 AM 1 50 175 3 1 0 21 1 25 0 2 0 174 22 2 0 4 3 0 1 485 9:45 AM 0 36 224 4 0 2 22 10 28 0 1 1 198 31 0 0 3 3 2 3 568 Hourly Total 2 161 767 14 1 3 83 16 91 0 6 6 741 108 2 0 11 15 5 7 2039 10:00 AM 1 45 175 6 2 0 13 3 28 0 2 2 201 31 0 0 7 6 0 0 522 10:15 AM 1 38 184 7 0 0 30 4 28 0 0 0 206 33 0 0 2 1 3 0 537 10:30 AM 1 37 187 4 3 0 28 3 29 0 4 2 201 26 0 0 3 7 2 0 537 10:45 AM 0 44 247 3 0 2 41 4 32 0 0 4 231 33 0 0 2 2 1 0 646 Hourly Total 3 164 793 20 5 2 112 14 117 0 6 8 839 123 0 0 14 16 6 0 2242 11:00 AM 1 53 204 2 0 2 24 5 39 0 2 2 267 47 1 0 4 4 2 0 659 11:15 AM 3 39 212 3 0 0 28 2 45 0 1 3 297 45 2 0 3 2 3 0 688 11:30 AM 1 64 259 1 0 2 34 3 44 0 2 1 285 42 0 0 3 5 0 0 746 11:45 AM 1 56 246 5 0 2 47 3 46 0 0 3 285 41 0 0 2 3 5 0 745 Hourly Total 6 212 921 11 0 6 133 13 174 0 5 9 1134 175 3 0 12 14 10 0 2838 12:00 PM 0 54 261 3 0 1 32 5 45 1 3 3 302 67 0 0 7 10 7 0 801 12:15 PM 0 54 261 3 0 1 40 2 40 0 3 2 293 61 0 0 4 3 1 0 768 12:30 PM 0 53 228 6 0 0 46 4 49 0 5 4 281 51 0 0 3 3 2 0 735 12:45 PM 0 61 263 7 0 0 34 4 55 1 3 7 266 53 0 0 5 5 2 0 766 Hourly Total 0 222 1013 19 0 2 152 15 189 2 14 16 1142 232 0 0 19 21 12 0 3070 1:00 PM 2 60 231 8 0 1 59 6 44 1 4 3 299 49 0 0 4 5 4 0 780 1:15 PM 1 57 268 4 0 0 56 7 41 0 4 8 267 47 0 0 6 4 3 0 773 1:30 PM 2 59 250 7 0 0 58 3 52 0 4 4 303 41 0 0 2 1 5 0 791 1:45 PM 2 43 257 9 0 3 37 6 43 0 3 4 237 39 0 0 4 9 5 0 701 Hourly Total 7 219 1006 28 0 4 210 22 180 1 15 19 1106 176 0 0 16 19 17 0 3045 2:00 PM 1 34 281 3 0 0 40 1 41 1 2 3 269 46 0 0 8 3 4 1 738 2:15 PM 1 53 244 3 0 3 35 4 37 0 4 5 243 49 0 0 2 4 3 1 691 2:30 PM 0 57 214 3 0 2 36 4 48 0 0 2 243 46 0 0 7 4 7 0 673 2:45 PM 0 51 252 4 0 0 36 8 34 0 0 4 259 39 0 0 6 3 3 0 699 Hourly Total 2 195 991 13 0 5 147 17 160 1 6 14 1014 180 0 0 23 14 17 2 2801 3:00 PM 3 42 243 3 1 3 29 3 53 1 1 2 250 42 0 0 5 1 11 0 693 3:15 PM 1 43 287 2 0 0 33 4 44 1 3 4 278 35 0 0 1 6 3 0 745 3:30 PM 3 37 261 1 0 2 42 3 43 0 3 5 279 36 2 0 4 4 0 1 726 3:45 PM 2 41 243 4 0 1 36 5 45 1 3 2 303 45 1 0 4 8 3 0 747 Hourly Total 9 163 1034 10 1 6 140 15 185 3 10 13 1110 158 3 0 14 19 17 1 2911 France Ave Hazelton Rd Hazelton Rd & France Ave Edina, Minnesota Wednesday, January 10, 2018 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTALFrance Ave Hazelton Rd Appendix C: Traffic Counts C5 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 4:00 PM 2 47 267 2 0 0 38 5 32 0 1 3 329 43 1 0 6 7 0 0 783 4:15 PM 2 50 243 0 0 2 26 7 53 0 2 0 348 43 1 0 3 10 0 0 790 4:30 PM 3 49 246 5 0 0 39 7 32 0 1 4 306 39 0 0 2 7 3 0 743 4:45 PM 2 43 228 2 0 2 36 4 49 0 0 2 369 50 0 0 4 6 1 0 798 Hourly Total 9 189 984 9 0 4 139 23 166 0 4 9 1352 175 2 0 15 30 4 0 3114 5:00 PM 2 43 209 2 0 1 37 8 52 0 3 4 316 48 0 0 6 11 1 0 743 5:15 PM 1 45 243 2 0 0 34 5 33 0 1 5 352 45 1 0 1 3 3 3 777 5:30 PM 1 47 232 1 0 0 40 6 38 0 0 3 348 40 0 0 11 7 4 0 778 5:45 PM 2 47 191 5 0 0 32 5 37 0 1 0 279 37 1 0 7 3 1 0 648 Hourly Total 6 182 875 10 0 1 143 24 160 0 5 12 1295 170 2 0 25 24 9 3 2946 6:00 PM 0 41 186 0 0 2 34 4 51 0 0 1 251 36 0 0 3 8 0 0 617 6:15 PM 1 36 213 2 0 2 38 3 30 1 2 4 237 30 0 0 9 3 7 0 618 6:30 PM 2 40 176 0 1 0 31 4 33 0 3 4 198 35 0 0 2 2 1 0 532 6:45 PM 0 32 130 2 0 1 39 2 37 0 0 1 174 30 0 0 4 8 0 0 460 Hourly Total 3 149 705 4 1 5 142 13 151 1 5 10 860 131 0 0 18 21 8 0 2227 7:00 PM 1 39 161 2 0 0 19 4 23 0 2 1 170 29 0 0 3 2 0 4 460 7:15 PM 1 19 154 1 0 0 18 3 31 0 3 1 153 32 0 0 2 4 1 0 423 7:30 PM 0 20 134 1 0 0 19 3 26 0 1 1 129 34 0 0 2 2 2 1 375 7:45 PM 2 21 134 1 0 0 24 3 16 0 1 3 146 18 0 0 3 2 1 0 375 Hourly Total 4 99 583 5 0 0 80 13 96 0 7 6 598 113 0 0 10 10 4 5 1633 8:00 PM 1 17 137 0 1 1 37 1 20 0 2 1 142 22 0 0 2 1 3 1 389 8:15 PM 0 8 120 1 0 0 18 1 26 0 0 0 104 39 0 0 0 2 2 0 321 8:30 PM 1 11 118 0 0 0 19 5 20 0 0 1 107 17 0 0 0 3 0 0 302 8:45 PM 0 12 112 0 0 0 12 1 17 0 0 0 95 18 0 0 2 0 0 0 269 Hourly Total 2 48 487 1 1 1 86 8 83 0 2 2 448 96 0 0 4 6 5 1 1281 9:00 PM 0 12 102 0 0 0 17 3 18 0 0 0 76 6 0 0 2 0 0 0 236 9:15 PM 0 7 95 2 0 0 14 6 7 0 0 0 53 13 0 0 2 1 0 1 201 9:30 PM 0 9 55 0 0 0 11 2 10 0 0 0 61 9 0 0 4 0 2 0 163 9:45 PM 0 7 54 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 52 7 0 0 2 0 0 0 133 Hourly Total 0 35 306 2 1 0 47 11 40 0 0 0 242 35 0 0 10 1 2 1 733 10:00 PM 0 3 46 1 0 0 5 2 8 0 0 0 42 3 0 0 3 1 2 0 116 10:15 PM 0 5 39 1 0 0 7 0 2 0 1 1 40 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 101 10:30 PM 0 1 43 2 0 0 3 1 2 0 0 1 32 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 92 10:45 PM 0 0 28 2 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 1 26 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 66 Hourly Total 0 9 156 6 0 0 18 3 16 0 1 3 140 13 0 0 5 1 4 0 375 11:00 PM 0 3 26 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 0 0 23 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 11:15 PM 0 2 13 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 11:30 PM 0 1 28 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 47 11:45 PM 0 3 13 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Hourly Total 0 9 80 0 0 0 14 1 4 0 0 0 60 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 176 DAILY TOTAL 60 2375 12691 185 11 40 1829 227 1959 8 98 144 13602 2097 19 0 223 244 127 22 35961 Cars 59 2347 12544 182 11 40 1757 225 1936 7 97 140 13431 2022 17 0 219 243 125 21 35423 Heavy Vehicles 1 28 147 3 0 0 72 2 23 1 1 4 171 75 2 0 4 1 2 1 538 Heavy Vehicle %1.67%1.18%1.16%1.62%0.00%0.00%3.94%0.88%1.17%12.50%1.02%2.78%1.26%3.58%10.53%0.00%1.79%0.41%1.57%4.55%1.50% TOTALFrance Ave Hazelton Rd France Ave Hazelton Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Hazelton Rd & France Ave Edina, Minnesota Wednesday, January 10, 2018 Appendix C: Traffic Counts C6 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns to Westboun d Left Turns to Southbou nd 2 Straight Through to Northbou nd Right Turns to Eastboun d Peds U Turns Left Turns to Westboun d Straight Through to Northbou nd Right Turns to Eastboun d Right Turns to Southbou nd 1 Peds U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns to Southbou nd 1 Right Turns to Southbou nd 2 Peds U Turns Left Turns Straight Through to Southbou nd 1 Straight Through to Southbou nd 2 Right Turns Peds U Turns Left Turns to Southbou nd 1 Left Turns to Southbou nd 2 Straight Through Right Turns Peds 00:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 00:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 003:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 004:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 005:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 05:30 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 1 006:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 10 1 0 06:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 12 0 0 06:30 0 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 12 0 006:45 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 14 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 18 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 14 2 0 07:15 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 20 3 0 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 23 2 0 07:45 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 18 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 22 1 0 08:00 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 20 3 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 34 3 0 08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 24 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 34 2 0 08:30 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 21 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 29 4 0 08:45 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 26 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 2 0 2 42 4 0 09:00 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 25 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 5 1 0 52 4 0 09:15 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 30 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 9 3 4 0 0 67 3 0 09:30 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 27 3 1 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 4 0 0 44 2 0 09:45 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10 33 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 6 1 1 57 3 010:00 0 5 1 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 10 38 1 1 0 0 5 0 0 4 2 4 0 0 42 3 0 10:15 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 37 0 4 0 0 7 0 0 5 0 4 0 0 44 5 0 10:30 0 4 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 11 35 1 1 0 0 4 0 0 4 2 9 1 2 46 2 010:45 0 10 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 13 42 2 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 5 1 2 53 3 0 11:00 0 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 7 66 1 3 0 0 2 0 0 7 1 10 0 1 81 4 0 11:15 0 4 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 19 49 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 5 1 14 1 4 70 8 011:30 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 14 79 0 4 0 0 7 1 0 8 1 14 0 4 62 3 0 11:45 0 4 0 3 6 3 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 22 68 1 3 0 0 5 0 0 6 2 9 1 3 81 5 0 12:00 0 3 1 4 6 1 0 2 0 3 0 2 0 15 53 0 5 0 0 8 0 0 11 0 13 0 4 88 3 012:15 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 14 72 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 11 2 6 70 0 0 12:30 0 4 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 16 71 1 3 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 13 0 3 89 4 0 12:45 0 8 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 12 0 4 1 18 62 2 3 0 0 10 0 0 3 3 12 2 4 90 4 013:00 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 2 8 69 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 7 0 5 70 2 0 13:15 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 13 57 0 4 0 0 8 0 1 6 0 14 0 3 80 7 0 13:30 0 6 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 5 0 15 55 1 3 0 0 6 1 0 7 1 6 1 1 63 5 0 13:45 0 4 1 2 6 1 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 15 62 1 1 0 0 4 1 0 2 1 11 1 5 72 7 0 14:00 0 6 0 3 4 2 0 1 0 7 0 5 0 12 55 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 10 1 9 0 3 81 5 0 14:15 0 4 0 3 7 2 0 2 0 6 0 7 0 19 60 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 5 1 9 0 3 57 1 0 14:30 0 7 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 4 1 5 0 16 62 1 1 0 0 6 0 0 10 1 9 1 3 70 4 0 14:45 0 8 0 4 1 1 0 2 0 4 0 9 1 11 79 1 3 0 0 9 1 0 6 2 5 0 6 72 3 1 15:00 0 1 0 3 5 2 0 0 0 7 2 9 0 18 62 0 5 0 0 11 0 0 7 2 8 1 4 60 3 0 15:15 0 4 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 16 57 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 15 2 6 0 1 61 3 015:30 0 2 0 0 3 2 0 3 1 1 0 2 0 16 46 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 11 0 7 0 0 59 4 0 15:45 0 3 0 0 4 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 2 15 49 2 0 0 0 13 0 0 6 0 7 1 6 61 8 0 16:00 0 5 0 4 3 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 18 57 1 2 0 0 7 0 0 9 2 5 2 2 57 3 016:15 0 7 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 13 51 1 2 0 0 9 1 0 9 2 8 0 5 76 3 0 16:30 0 8 0 2 2 2 0 1 0 4 0 2 1 21 57 2 1 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 4 0 2 69 2 0 16:45 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 3 0 18 69 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 10 0 2 75 4 017:00 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 2 1 5 0 3 0 12 69 0 6 0 0 8 0 0 20 3 11 0 4 64 1 0 17:15 0 4 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 14 57 0 5 0 0 4 1 0 11 0 4 0 5 60 3 0 17:30 0 6 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 0 19 50 0 4 0 0 7 0 1 8 0 4 0 3 69 3 017:45 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 1 10 69 1 2 0 0 7 0 0 7 2 14 1 2 59 1 0 18:00 0 9 0 4 6 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 19 34 0 5 0 1 8 0 0 4 0 1 1 1 63 2 0 18:15 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 3 0 6 0 1 1 10 50 0 3 0 0 2 1 0 6 2 5 2 5 48 3 018:30 0 7 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 0 6 41 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 7 0 6 0 3 54 1 0 18:45 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 9 41 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 6 0 3 58 6 0 19:00 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 12 42 0 4 0 0 9 0 0 10 0 1 0 1 44 0 0 19:15 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 34 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 4 1 3 36 2 0 19:30 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 3 32 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 6 0 0 34 1 0 19:45 0 7 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 2 0 2 34 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 33 3 0 20:00 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 5 40 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 26 1 0 20:15 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 2 34 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 35 1 0 20:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 5 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 36 0 0 20:45 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 21 0 0 21:00 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 38 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 21 1 0 21:15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 4 24 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 20 0 0 21:30 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 14 0 0 21:45 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 13 0 0 22:00 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 0 0 10 0 0 22:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 8 0 022:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 023:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 23:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hazelton Rd & Site Driveway, January 9, 2018 Southbound 1 Southbound 2 Westbound Northbound Eastbound Appendix C: Traffic Counts C7 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns to Westboun d Left Turns to Southbou nd 2 Straight Through to Northbou nd Right Turns to Eastboun d Peds U Turns Left Turns to Westboun d Straight Through to Northbou nd Right Turns to Eastboun d Right Turns to Southbou nd 1 Peds U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns to Southbou nd 1 Right Turns to Southbou nd 2 Peds U Turns Left Turns Straight Through to Southbou nd 1 Straight Through to Southbou nd 2 Right Turns Peds U Turns Left Turns to Southbou nd 1 Left Turns to Southbou nd 2 Straight Through Right Turns Peds 00:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 00:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 00:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 02:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 03:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 003:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 04:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 004:30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 005:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 05:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 006:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 06:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 06:30 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 13 1 006:45 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 14 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 22 1 0 07:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 12 2 0 07:15 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 9 2 0 07:30 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 17 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 23 1 0 07:45 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 6 15 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 24 0 0 08:00 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 16 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 36 3 0 08:15 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 19 2 0 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 35 0 0 08:30 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 23 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 27 0 0 08:45 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 24 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 5 0 1 27 4 0 09:00 0 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 18 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 45 3 0 09:15 0 2 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 26 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 2 0 54 0 0 09:30 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 30 2 2 0 0 6 0 0 4 3 6 4 0 41 6 0 09:45 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 3 0 12 46 1 5 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 5 1 2 40 4 010:00 0 5 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 7 39 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 4 2 4 55 2 0 10:15 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 16 48 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 7 1 4 1 1 41 2 0 10:30 0 5 0 1 2 1 0 4 0 4 0 1 0 9 38 1 2 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 8 0 4 44 5 010:45 0 6 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 14 44 2 3 0 0 5 0 0 4 1 2 2 1 46 2 0 11:00 0 5 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 13 48 2 3 0 0 4 1 0 8 2 4 1 5 63 8 0 11:15 0 4 0 1 2 1 0 3 1 2 1 1 0 16 52 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 1 6 1 3 54 5 011:30 0 1 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 12 47 1 2 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 9 0 1 87 5 0 11:45 0 8 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 26 70 0 1 0 0 7 0 1 9 1 12 2 3 70 4 0 12:00 0 9 0 0 6 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 17 54 1 4 0 0 6 0 1 6 0 7 1 2 85 4 012:15 0 5 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 21 59 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 11 0 9 2 3 84 3 0 12:30 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 17 62 0 1 0 0 10 0 0 6 0 3 1 3 89 4 0 12:45 0 6 0 4 5 2 0 1 0 4 0 2 2 19 60 1 2 0 0 7 0 0 8 1 5 2 4 89 5 013:00 0 6 0 2 10 0 0 4 0 6 0 1 0 18 59 2 5 0 0 6 0 0 10 0 9 3 2 84 1 0 13:15 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 24 63 2 0 0 0 8 2 0 8 0 9 4 5 75 3 0 13:30 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 16 75 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 12 0 12 1 3 72 3 0 13:45 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 4 1 0 1 22 54 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 8 0 2 76 4 0 14:00 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 3 1 0 0 16 55 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 12 1 9 1 7 49 5 0 14:15 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 17 53 0 2 1 0 9 0 0 10 1 10 0 4 74 5 0 14:30 0 5 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 7 63 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 8 0 5 81 2 0 14:45 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 17 40 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 8 1 1 60 3 0 15:00 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 18 60 1 3 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 5 1 2 68 4 0 15:15 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 10 54 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 7 0 5 1 3 50 5 015:30 0 3 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 12 55 1 4 1 0 6 0 0 7 0 9 1 3 56 5 0 15:45 0 5 0 0 5 4 0 1 0 5 0 4 0 27 56 1 1 0 0 6 0 0 14 0 7 0 0 66 3 0 16:00 0 3 0 1 2 2 0 3 1 4 0 2 0 19 50 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 11 1 7 0 2 73 5 016:15 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 1 21 45 1 5 0 0 12 0 2 7 1 7 1 4 77 4 0 16:30 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 19 58 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 12 0 1 65 5 0 16:45 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 14 62 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 4 0 13 0 6 76 3 017:00 0 5 0 4 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 19 57 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 10 0 9 1 2 81 5 0 17:15 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 15 60 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 8 1 1 65 4 0 17:30 0 5 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 14 54 0 1 0 0 6 0 0 8 2 11 0 2 65 1 017:45 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 3 27 53 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 8 0 5 0 1 69 5 0 18:00 0 6 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 19 56 0 3 0 1 10 0 0 10 0 13 0 3 61 7 0 18:15 0 3 0 1 3 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 2 9 47 1 0 0 0 7 0 0 2 2 8 1 2 49 4 018:30 0 3 0 2 3 1 0 1 0 4 0 1 2 11 48 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 9 0 11 0 3 49 4 0 18:45 0 3 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 4 0 1 0 13 49 1 1 0 0 3 0 0 7 0 8 0 5 45 1 0 19:00 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 0 0 9 31 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 4 0 1 53 3 0 19:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 29 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 3 1 9 0 3 39 1 0 19:30 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 32 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 5 1 4 0 0 49 0 0 19:45 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 7 36 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 33 1 0 20:00 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 6 34 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 4 0 2 36 0 0 20:15 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 26 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 5 0 1 48 0 0 20:30 0 4 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 31 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 31 0 0 20:45 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 9 19 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 24 3 0 21:00 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 2 32 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 21:15 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 21 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 15 0 0 21:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 17 0 0 21:45 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 22:00 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 22:15 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 7 0 022:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 23:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 023:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 23:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 Hazelton Rd & Site Driveway, January 10, 2018 Southbound 1 Southbound 2 Westbound Northbound Eastbound Appendix C: Traffic Counts C8 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 12:00 AM 0 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 29 12:15 AM 0 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 23 12:30 AM 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 12:45 AM 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Hourly Total 0 0 34 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 23 0 0 0 7 0 6 0 77 1:00 AM 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 18 1:15 AM 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 1:30 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1:45 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Hourly Total 0 0 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 34 2:00 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 2:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 2:30 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Total 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 19 3:00 AM 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 3:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3:30 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 3:45 AM 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 10 Hourly Total 0 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 19 4:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 4:30 AM 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 4:45 AM 0 0 23 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 40 Hourly Total 0 0 29 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 0 0 0 2 0 8 0 59 5:00 AM 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 29 5:15 AM 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 32 5:30 AM 0 0 26 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 2 0 9 0 48 5:45 AM 0 0 45 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 19 0 0 0 3 0 7 0 81 Hourly Total 0 0 102 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 46 0 0 0 7 0 24 0 190 6:00 AM 0 1 26 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 9 41 0 0 0 2 0 5 1 90 6:15 AM 0 0 24 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 32 0 1 0 4 0 8 2 85 6:30 AM 0 0 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 52 0 2 0 11 0 8 0 123 6:45 AM 0 1 51 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 53 0 0 0 5 1 9 2 140 Hourly Total 0 2 139 24 2 0 0 0 1 1 6 24 178 0 3 0 22 1 30 5 438 7:00 AM 1 1 44 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 13 75 1 0 0 10 1 10 1 164 7:15 AM 1 4 79 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 11 64 0 1 0 6 0 6 0 185 7:30 AM 1 4 108 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 80 1 0 0 6 2 7 0 228 7:45 AM 2 4 128 17 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 11 96 3 0 0 7 2 19 0 292 Hourly Total 5 13 359 38 1 0 1 1 1 1 6 45 315 5 1 0 29 5 42 1 869 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound York Ave Hazelton Rd York Ave Hazelton Rd TOTAL Hazelton Rd & York Avenue Edina, Minnesota Tuesday, January 9, 2018 Appendix C: Traffic Counts C9 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 8:00 AM 0 3 104 22 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 10 82 4 0 0 14 2 12 0 259 8:15 AM 1 6 112 24 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 20 98 6 0 0 17 2 9 1 300 8:30 AM 1 3 110 13 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 12 90 4 0 0 18 2 10 0 270 8:45 AM 1 8 123 19 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 16 78 7 1 0 12 1 17 0 287 Hourly Total 3 20 449 78 4 0 4 1 3 2 7 58 348 21 1 0 61 7 48 1 1116 9:00 AM 2 7 99 17 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 25 84 4 0 0 17 3 16 0 279 9:15 AM 3 3 123 20 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 18 106 2 0 0 26 1 24 0 333 9:30 AM 2 5 104 28 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 13 94 3 1 0 20 0 24 0 300 9:45 AM 3 4 98 34 2 0 2 2 4 2 8 18 99 6 1 0 22 2 11 1 319 Hourly Total 10 19 424 99 2 0 3 2 12 4 15 74 383 15 2 0 85 6 75 1 1231 10:00 AM 2 3 100 27 2 0 0 0 2 4 3 21 115 4 1 0 29 0 19 0 332 10:15 AM 1 1 104 25 3 0 0 1 3 3 2 22 107 4 3 0 23 0 15 1 318 10:30 AM 3 3 113 30 1 0 0 0 4 3 2 26 96 0 3 0 33 1 16 0 334 10:45 AM 4 4 115 28 3 0 2 0 3 5 2 36 116 3 4 0 36 0 14 1 376 Hourly Total 10 11 432 110 9 0 2 1 12 15 9 105 434 11 11 0 121 1 64 2 1360 11:00 AM 6 7 117 34 0 0 1 2 2 3 5 41 146 2 3 0 36 0 31 1 437 11:15 AM 5 5 126 38 2 0 2 1 3 0 3 42 164 3 4 0 36 1 31 1 467 11:30 AM 2 7 178 44 0 0 3 1 5 1 8 42 159 6 2 0 33 2 26 1 520 11:45 AM 4 2 136 40 1 0 4 3 4 1 4 32 162 4 3 0 36 1 34 2 473 Hourly Total 17 21 557 156 3 0 10 7 14 5 20 157 631 15 12 0 141 4 122 5 1897 12:00 PM 6 4 156 46 1 0 2 3 3 2 17 40 158 7 1 0 52 0 33 0 531 12:15 PM 0 3 146 42 0 0 3 5 4 2 5 60 166 4 3 0 41 1 29 0 514 12:30 PM 2 2 175 43 2 0 1 1 8 5 4 37 149 4 2 0 54 2 39 0 530 12:45 PM 7 1 189 50 1 0 3 1 5 1 2 51 129 6 2 0 54 1 30 1 534 Hourly Total 15 10 666 181 4 0 9 10 20 10 28 188 602 21 8 0 201 4 131 1 2109 1:00 PM 3 4 150 34 2 0 3 1 4 3 6 38 113 3 4 0 56 1 39 0 464 1:15 PM 1 6 150 33 2 0 2 1 5 2 4 42 125 2 0 0 51 1 35 0 462 1:30 PM 5 4 156 34 1 0 1 3 3 4 6 34 128 4 5 0 37 1 29 2 457 1:45 PM 7 4 167 34 0 0 2 0 4 2 5 27 127 1 0 0 49 1 30 1 461 Hourly Total 16 18 623 135 5 0 8 5 16 11 21 141 493 10 9 0 193 4 133 3 1844 2:00 PM 4 0 134 35 2 0 5 0 7 10 4 46 134 7 4 0 44 1 35 1 473 2:15 PM 4 5 148 34 0 0 2 1 7 3 4 20 129 3 3 0 40 1 20 5 429 2:30 PM 0 2 137 31 3 0 1 1 3 2 5 35 134 3 2 0 51 1 27 0 438 2:45 PM 4 0 163 36 6 0 0 4 5 3 1 31 112 6 1 0 50 0 23 0 445 Hourly Total 12 7 582 136 11 0 8 6 22 18 14 132 509 19 10 0 185 3 105 6 1785 3:00 PM 8 4 133 47 2 0 5 1 4 3 4 35 135 1 3 0 43 3 26 0 457 3:15 PM 6 3 172 37 1 0 4 4 3 3 2 25 124 2 3 0 34 1 26 3 453 3:30 PM 1 2 154 30 1 0 1 0 2 3 2 25 136 1 3 0 50 0 30 1 442 3:45 PM 5 2 172 29 1 0 1 1 6 3 1 26 145 3 1 0 40 0 24 2 462 Hourly Total 20 11 631 143 5 0 11 6 15 12 9 111 540 7 10 0 167 4 106 6 1814 TOTALYork Ave Hazelton Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Hazelton Rd & York Avenue Edina, Minnesota Tuesday, January 9, 2018 York Ave Hazelton Rd Appendix C: Traffic Counts C10 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 4:00 PM 5 4 169 34 1 0 3 0 4 3 2 40 156 1 2 0 34 1 40 0 499 4:15 PM 6 0 148 38 1 0 1 3 3 1 1 39 139 0 2 0 50 0 35 0 467 4:30 PM 2 2 171 37 0 0 3 3 4 4 2 23 190 3 3 0 43 0 36 3 529 4:45 PM 3 2 156 47 0 0 2 5 6 2 4 49 161 2 1 0 42 0 25 0 507 Hourly Total 16 8 644 156 2 0 9 11 17 10 9 151 646 6 8 0 169 1 136 3 2002 5:00 PM 6 4 167 19 1 0 4 3 13 1 4 40 159 1 0 0 47 0 43 1 513 5:15 PM 1 0 175 25 2 0 1 1 7 2 5 37 196 1 1 0 49 0 28 1 532 5:30 PM 3 1 157 46 0 0 3 0 6 0 4 45 153 2 0 0 59 0 25 1 505 5:45 PM 2 0 189 38 0 0 4 0 5 2 4 32 149 2 0 0 32 0 26 0 485 Hourly Total 12 5 688 128 3 0 12 4 31 5 17 154 657 6 1 0 187 0 122 3 2035 6:00 PM 3 1 156 23 3 0 0 1 3 0 3 42 139 0 0 0 55 0 20 0 449 6:15 PM 8 0 117 29 1 0 2 0 2 0 4 25 153 3 0 0 41 0 28 0 413 6:30 PM 3 0 135 28 1 0 1 0 7 1 4 21 123 2 2 0 44 0 32 0 404 6:45 PM 1 1 126 21 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 24 96 0 3 0 39 0 21 1 340 Hourly Total 15 2 534 101 5 0 3 1 13 3 15 112 511 5 5 0 179 0 101 1 1606 7:00 PM 2 0 95 30 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 30 91 0 0 0 34 0 28 0 317 7:15 PM 2 1 91 16 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 21 103 1 1 0 17 0 22 0 280 7:30 PM 4 0 96 19 1 0 1 0 2 3 0 15 84 1 2 0 37 0 23 1 289 7:45 PM 2 0 89 15 3 0 1 0 1 2 1 21 78 1 1 0 26 0 20 0 261 Hourly Total 10 1 371 80 4 0 3 2 6 6 6 87 356 3 4 0 114 0 93 1 1147 8:00 PM 3 1 69 17 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 9 79 0 0 0 24 0 12 0 216 8:15 PM 0 1 89 13 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 8 65 0 0 0 29 0 18 0 227 8:30 PM 0 0 60 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 54 0 0 0 26 0 13 1 180 8:45 PM 0 0 55 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 51 0 1 0 17 0 10 0 155 Hourly Total 3 2 273 50 0 0 0 1 2 0 9 38 249 0 1 0 96 0 53 1 778 9:00 PM 0 1 68 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 6 43 0 0 0 14 0 12 0 157 9:15 PM 1 0 54 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 35 0 0 0 14 0 13 0 136 9:30 PM 1 1 58 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 26 0 0 0 6 0 11 0 116 9:45 PM 3 0 26 7 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 5 36 0 0 0 6 0 8 0 95 Hourly Total 5 2 206 33 0 0 2 0 1 2 2 27 140 0 0 0 40 0 44 0 504 10:00 PM 0 0 31 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 37 0 0 0 14 0 6 0 100 10:15 PM 0 0 41 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 20 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 77 10:30 PM 0 0 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 14 0 1 0 9 0 8 0 63 10:45 PM 0 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 11 0 0 0 5 0 5 1 36 Hourly Total 0 0 106 13 2 0 0 0 1 1 2 14 82 0 1 0 30 0 23 1 276 11:00 PM 0 1 12 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 3 9 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 37 11:15 PM 0 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 26 11:30 PM 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 21 11:45 PM 0 0 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Hourly Total 0 1 48 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 7 27 0 2 0 6 0 1 0 102 DAILY TOTAL 169 153 7930 1686 63 0 85 58 188 106 199 1634 7208 144 89 0 2049 40 1469 41 23311 Cars 169 152 7804 1626 63 0 83 57 186 101 196 1612 7056 141 87 0 1971 40 1437 39 22820 Heavy Vehicles 0 1 126 60 0 0 2 1 2 5 3 22 152 3 2 0 78 0 32 2 491 Heavy Vehicle %0.00%0.65%1.59%3.56%0.00%0.00%2.35%1.72%1.06%4.72%1.51%1.35%2.11%2.08%2.25%0.00%3.81%0.00%2.18%4.88%2.11% Tuesday, January 9, 2018 Hazelton Rd & York Avenue Edina, Minnesota Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTALYork Ave Hazelton Rd York Ave Hazelton Rd Appendix C: Traffic Counts C11 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 12:00 AM 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 14 12:15 AM 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 4 0 5 0 26 12:30 AM 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 12:45 AM 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 Hourly Total 0 0 26 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 5 0 8 1 62 1:00 AM 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 11 1:15 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Total 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 23 2:00 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2:15 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 2:45 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Hourly Total 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 17 3:00 AM 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 7 3:15 AM 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 3:30 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 3:45 AM 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 Hourly Total 0 0 7 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 26 4:00 AM 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 4:15 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 4:30 AM 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 10 4:45 AM 0 0 16 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 29 Hourly Total 0 0 26 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 1 0 5 0 4 0 53 5:00 AM 0 0 16 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 36 5:15 AM 0 0 18 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 33 5:30 AM 0 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 21 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 51 5:45 AM 0 0 30 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 20 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 58 Hourly Total 0 0 81 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 63 0 0 0 5 0 13 0 178 6:00 AM 0 0 30 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 32 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 82 6:15 AM 0 0 23 7 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 6 35 1 0 0 4 1 8 1 89 6:30 AM 0 0 31 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 49 0 0 0 11 1 7 0 115 6:45 AM 0 0 44 12 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 56 1 0 0 6 0 8 1 136 Hourly Total 0 0 128 36 2 0 0 0 1 2 2 23 172 2 0 0 26 2 24 2 422 7:00 AM 2 0 60 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 65 0 0 0 7 0 10 0 157 7:15 AM 1 0 71 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 77 1 1 0 10 1 4 0 185 7:30 AM 0 3 89 11 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 13 71 1 0 0 5 3 9 0 210 7:45 AM 0 10 112 11 1 0 0 1 1 1 3 12 82 3 1 0 6 1 15 0 260 Hourly Total 3 13 332 36 2 0 1 1 2 3 8 38 295 5 2 0 28 5 38 0 812 Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound York Ave Hazelton Rd York Ave Hazelton Rd TOTAL Hazelton Rd & York Avenue Edina, Minnesota Wednesday, January 10, 2018 Appendix C: Traffic Counts C12 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 8:00 AM 1 1 113 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 8 75 2 0 0 15 2 12 0 245 8:15 AM 1 4 115 14 2 0 0 0 1 2 3 14 100 4 0 0 16 3 20 0 299 8:30 AM 4 9 107 16 3 0 1 0 1 1 3 25 107 4 0 0 11 2 17 2 313 8:45 AM 2 2 106 15 0 0 1 0 3 0 2 18 103 7 1 0 11 3 13 1 288 Hourly Total 8 16 441 57 6 0 2 0 5 4 10 65 385 17 1 0 53 10 62 3 1145 9:00 AM 4 7 91 21 2 0 2 2 2 2 7 24 96 3 3 0 18 2 18 2 306 9:15 AM 2 3 116 21 3 0 1 0 1 1 4 20 107 2 0 0 21 2 20 0 324 9:30 AM 1 3 136 23 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 22 102 3 2 0 12 0 15 0 326 9:45 AM 8 2 109 26 0 0 1 1 1 2 5 30 112 4 4 0 16 1 12 2 336 Hourly Total 15 15 452 91 6 0 4 3 4 6 21 96 417 12 9 0 67 5 65 4 1292 10:00 AM 4 4 109 35 1 0 0 1 2 2 1 22 122 7 1 0 28 0 12 1 352 10:15 AM 2 7 102 32 0 0 2 0 7 1 4 33 137 5 1 0 31 1 18 0 383 10:30 AM 5 3 112 32 3 0 1 0 5 3 2 28 128 2 2 0 22 1 32 0 381 10:45 AM 0 4 140 42 1 0 0 0 2 4 5 49 110 3 1 0 31 1 22 0 415 Hourly Total 11 18 463 141 5 0 3 1 16 10 12 132 497 17 5 0 112 3 84 1 1531 11:00 AM 0 4 108 39 5 0 2 1 1 1 6 30 134 1 3 0 38 2 32 2 409 11:15 AM 2 3 150 38 0 0 2 1 3 1 7 39 143 3 0 0 38 0 17 0 447 11:30 AM 3 4 137 31 3 0 5 1 4 2 8 41 178 3 0 0 36 0 35 1 492 11:45 AM 4 1 161 54 2 0 0 5 2 1 5 47 147 2 2 0 41 1 40 1 516 Hourly Total 9 12 556 162 10 0 9 8 10 5 26 157 602 9 5 0 153 3 124 4 1864 12:00 PM 5 1 176 45 1 0 3 2 5 1 5 51 141 3 3 0 47 1 32 1 523 12:15 PM 3 3 168 53 1 0 2 3 0 0 8 39 154 2 1 0 47 2 45 1 532 12:30 PM 7 0 168 32 5 0 2 2 2 4 3 46 158 1 2 0 45 0 42 1 520 12:45 PM 7 3 175 35 0 0 1 1 8 2 3 54 158 7 1 0 48 3 51 0 557 Hourly Total 22 7 687 165 7 0 8 8 15 7 19 190 611 13 7 0 187 6 170 3 2132 1:00 PM 3 3 180 44 1 0 1 1 2 1 5 29 143 2 0 0 43 0 46 2 506 1:15 PM 5 4 140 53 3 0 0 2 6 4 4 37 126 3 5 0 48 1 31 2 474 1:30 PM 2 5 147 43 0 0 3 1 6 1 5 44 129 3 3 0 46 2 35 2 477 1:45 PM 0 4 149 23 0 0 4 2 2 2 2 39 122 4 0 0 42 0 29 0 424 Hourly Total 10 16 616 163 4 0 8 6 16 8 16 149 520 12 8 0 179 3 141 6 1881 2:00 PM 2 3 141 34 2 0 2 5 1 5 4 35 131 5 4 0 50 0 24 1 449 2:15 PM 3 3 162 38 1 0 0 3 2 2 5 33 124 0 2 0 49 3 33 2 465 2:30 PM 12 4 154 43 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 40 114 1 3 0 43 3 32 2 457 2:45 PM 3 3 134 40 1 0 4 0 2 1 2 33 118 1 1 0 44 2 27 1 417 Hourly Total 20 13 591 155 4 0 6 8 8 9 13 141 487 7 10 0 186 8 116 6 1788 3:00 PM 3 0 157 41 0 0 2 2 3 2 7 33 140 0 3 0 43 1 27 3 467 3:15 PM 4 3 164 33 2 0 1 3 5 0 3 28 144 4 1 0 43 0 26 0 464 3:30 PM 6 2 150 32 1 0 0 1 5 2 1 42 149 0 5 0 37 2 29 3 467 3:45 PM 4 2 170 31 1 0 4 2 3 2 6 33 119 3 2 0 36 3 33 2 456 Hourly Total 17 7 641 137 4 0 7 8 16 6 17 136 552 7 11 0 159 6 115 8 1854 TOTALYork Ave Hazelton Rd Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Hazelton Rd & York Avenue Edina, Minnesota Wednesday, January 10, 2018 York Ave Hazelton Rd Appendix C: Traffic Counts C13 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Time U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles U Turns Left Turns Straight Through Right Turns Peds/ Bicycles 4:00 PM 3 0 173 39 0 0 2 2 5 3 4 38 154 0 1 0 51 0 27 1 503 4:15 PM 2 0 168 50 2 0 0 3 6 5 4 37 151 1 4 0 46 0 36 4 519 4:30 PM 5 4 172 34 0 0 4 1 9 2 2 37 206 2 2 0 49 0 26 0 555 4:45 PM 3 2 153 28 1 0 3 3 10 1 2 57 182 1 0 0 57 1 36 0 540 Hourly Total 13 6 666 151 3 0 9 9 30 11 12 169 693 4 7 0 203 1 125 5 2117 5:00 PM 4 3 174 44 0 0 5 2 7 0 3 23 161 2 0 0 43 1 33 0 505 5:15 PM 2 0 167 39 0 0 2 1 5 0 3 48 206 0 0 0 37 1 27 0 538 5:30 PM 6 0 142 29 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 36 155 0 0 0 60 1 29 1 467 5:45 PM 4 2 165 46 0 0 2 1 2 0 4 34 160 1 2 0 29 0 36 0 488 Hourly Total 16 5 648 158 0 0 13 4 18 0 10 141 682 3 2 0 169 3 125 1 1998 6:00 PM 4 0 148 42 1 0 2 1 6 0 4 32 127 0 1 0 40 0 33 1 442 6:15 PM 2 0 128 31 0 0 0 4 2 0 1 39 157 0 0 0 36 0 30 0 430 6:30 PM 2 0 126 21 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 22 124 0 1 0 28 0 21 0 352 6:45 PM 2 1 102 25 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 26 105 0 0 0 35 0 25 0 324 Hourly Total 10 1 504 119 2 0 2 5 11 3 8 119 513 0 2 0 139 0 109 1 1548 7:00 PM 3 0 92 20 1 0 0 0 2 4 3 20 91 0 1 0 32 0 29 0 298 7:15 PM 3 0 104 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 81 0 0 0 42 0 14 1 286 7:30 PM 1 0 109 13 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 13 100 0 1 0 25 0 21 1 291 7:45 PM 0 0 92 19 2 0 0 0 1 1 1 16 76 0 0 0 29 1 21 0 259 Hourly Total 7 0 397 74 5 0 0 0 3 6 8 68 348 0 2 0 128 1 85 2 1134 8:00 PM 8 0 76 19 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 18 69 0 0 0 20 0 18 1 234 8:15 PM 0 0 80 14 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 58 0 0 0 43 0 16 1 220 8:30 PM 2 1 76 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 12 51 0 1 0 16 0 15 0 189 8:45 PM 5 0 63 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 11 50 0 0 0 21 0 16 0 175 Hourly Total 15 1 295 52 1 0 0 2 1 1 6 48 228 0 1 0 100 0 65 2 818 9:00 PM 2 0 82 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 14 56 0 1 0 13 0 11 1 200 9:15 PM 1 0 59 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 9 43 1 0 0 15 0 5 0 144 9:30 PM 1 0 44 6 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 10 36 0 0 0 10 0 4 0 117 9:45 PM 0 0 42 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 34 0 0 0 9 1 18 0 113 Hourly Total 4 0 227 36 0 0 0 0 1 3 7 38 169 1 1 0 47 1 38 1 574 10:00 PM 1 0 42 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 28 0 1 0 9 0 8 1 98 10:15 PM 1 0 26 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 6 0 5 0 59 10:30 PM 2 0 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 0 0 0 6 0 5 0 69 10:45 PM 0 0 15 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 33 Hourly Total 4 0 117 10 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6 75 0 1 0 23 0 19 2 259 11:00 PM 0 0 19 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 6 0 0 0 5 0 3 0 39 11:15 PM 0 0 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 7 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 30 11:30 PM 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 23 11:45 PM 0 0 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 22 Hourly Total 0 0 59 4 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 5 20 0 2 0 8 0 11 1 114 DAILY TOTAL 184 130 7977 1767 62 0 73 63 157 88 199 1727 7389 109 77 0 1986 57 1544 53 23642 Cars 184 130 7847 1706 62 0 73 61 152 86 193 1708 7215 104 76 0 1924 56 1523 53 23153 Heavy Vehicles 0 0 130 61 0 0 0 2 5 2 6 19 174 5 1 0 62 1 21 0 489 Heavy Vehicle %0.00%0.00%1.63%3.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.17%3.18%2.27%3.02%1.10%2.35%4.59%1.30%0.00%3.12%1.75%1.36%0.00%2.07% Wednesday, January 10, 2018 Hazelton Rd & York Avenue Edina, Minnesota Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound TOTALYork Ave Hazelton Rd York Ave Hazelton Rd Appendix C: Traffic Counts C14 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Research Brief — Volume No. 3 Level of Service (LOS) Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative description, similar to typical school grades, that traffic engineers use to communi-cate how good or bad traffic operations are on a corridor, intersection, or interchange. Common Factors Traffic can be a hard thing to quantify as everyone has a different tolerance for congestion. What seems excessively long to one person may seem good enough for another. These differences are readily apparent when comparing small towns or rural areas, where five cars an hour can be the norm, to big cities or downtowns, where less than hundred cars an hour, even in the middle of night, is rare. To combat this issue and provide a consistent measuring tool for traffic studies, a “Level of Service” rating was developed. Level of Service ratings are based on the roadway or intersection characteristics and the amount of traffic. Just like grade school, LOS A represents the best traffic operations, where traffic flows freely. LOS F, on the other hand, represents failing operations, where the road or intersection is congested and running beyond maximum capacity. LOS E is typically considered “at capacity” which means the amount of traffic is right at the level the roadway or intersection can adequately accommodate. Using Level of Service letter grades provides an easy way to convey road operations to the general public and has been adopted across the United States. Level of Service criteria have been developed for multiple types of traffic operations including: • Intersections • Urban Corridors • Freeways • Transit Service • Bicycle Operations • Pedestrian Operations The most common LOS criteria used is for car operations at intersections; both signalized and unsignalized. For an intersection Level of Service analysis, average delay for cars travelling through the intersection is used to determine the appropriate grade. A high delay results in a poor LOS rating and equates to poor operations. Similarly, low delay results in a good LOS rating and equates to good or great operations. LOS can be determined for the intersection as a whole, or for individual movements. It is common during peak periods in major population areas for an intersection to have an acceptable overall LOS rating, but fail to achieve a good grade for individual movements.Common Factors Impacting Level of Service • Number of Lanes. • Traffic Volumes. • Intersection Control (stop sign, signal, roundabout, interchange.) • Amount of access on a corridor. • Percentage of turning traffic. • Traffic signal cycle length (green time devoted to each approach) and phasing (one green for all approach movements or separate green arrows.) • Percentage of heavy trucks. • Roadway Grades. • Distribution of traffic within a peak hour as well as over the course of a day. • Pedestrian activity. • Bicycle activity. Appendix D: Level of Service (LOS) D1 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Resources • Highway Capacity Manual, fifth edition • Nation Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 616; Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets • http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_616.pdf • Florida Department of Transportation Quality/Level of Service Handbook • http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/programs/sm/los/pdfs/2009FDOTQLOS_Handbook.pdf Although a Level of Service rating of A represents the best traffic operations, it is not always the most desirable. Providing LOS A for all corridors and all operations at all times would require a significant amount of land to be devoted to the road infrastructure, which makes it extremely costly to build and maintain. During non-peak times, like overnight, much of that infrastructure would sit unused. On the opposite side of the spectrum, a Level of Service rating of E and F represent traffic operations close to breaking down, or that already have. These ratings mean high delays, long queues, and slow speeds, not to mention driver frustration. Instead of trying to achieve one or the other, government agencies try to strike a balance between providing acceptable operations, neither falling nor flowing too freely. Because of this, LOS D is typically considered the lowest LOS acceptable by government agencies and is reflective of a balanced approach between cost and benefit. About This Brief Spack Consulting prepared this brief as part of our company’s vision to significantly improve the practice of traffic engineering and transportation planning. Transportation professionals from around the world have assisted us in developing this document. We are providing this brief under the Creative Commons Attribution License. Feel free to use-modify-share this guide, but please give us some credit in your document. To request our whole series of Design Briefs and to be included on our distribution list for new materials, please email mspack@spackconsulting.com. And please reach out if you have any comments or questions related to this Design Brief. There are many tools and guidelines used to determine a roads Level of Service rating. Simple tools like generalized roadway capacities allow for planning-level efforts. While inexpensive and quick to complete, they are not as accurate as other options. More complicated tools, such as mi-cro-simulations, provide more accurate results, but cost more and take more time. It is important to understand the trade-offs between the analysis types as well as the purpose of the study. Research Brief — Volume No. 3 Source: Florida Deptarment of Transportation LOS A LOS C LOS D = Acceptable LOS F = Unacceptable Source: City of San Jose, CA. Appendix D: Level of Service (LOS) D2 Traffic Impact Study 3650 Hazelton Apartments Redevelopment Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 1/31/2018Report File: C:\...\AM Existing.pdf Scenario 1 AM ExistingVistro File: C:\...\Hazelton Vistro - Updates.vistro 3650 Hazelton Road V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B13.50.259NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedYork Avenue & Hazelton Road3 A3.7EB ThruHCM 6th EditionRoundaboutHazelton & Site Driveway2 B12.80.279NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedFrance Avenue & Hazelton Road1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E1 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.279Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: France Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 125.00100.00125.00100.00100.0075.00100.00100.00225.00300.00100.00150.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 5005v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 5005v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 461186211999731497167610Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 11321132224337181692Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 42107921088895137656229Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 19001003002200Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.001.003.753.501.800.001.251.301.253.751.253.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 611079310811895137876229Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Volumes Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E2 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0250028001300190Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070070070Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 025002500501505015Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 020002000451004510Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lag--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E3 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 41.129.5182.6711.268.0590.4782.85169.3224.2580.1013.2095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.640.383.310.450.323.623.316.770.973.200.5395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 22.845.2845.936.264.4750.2646.0394.0613.4744.507.3450th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.910.211.840.250.182.011.843.760.541.780.2950th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group CCDCDAADAAELane Group LOS 34.9033.6738.8433.7435.655.865.6252.587.758.5056.36d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.220.040.370.050.040.260.260.820.080.220.43X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.500.070.980.090.060.500.2612.950.170.1712.28d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.110.110.110.500.500.170.500.500.11k, delay calibration 34.4033.6137.8633.6535.595.365.3639.627.588.3344.08d1, Uniform Delay [s] 21326123225023912862461182909307023c, Capacity [veh/h] 15371885135418101398187035801792151851241767s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.030.010.060.010.010.180.180.080.050.130.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.140.140.140.140.140.690.690.100.600.600.01g / C, Green / Cycle 12121212126262954541g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 9090909090909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCLCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E4 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 33.74 33.7435.65 38.84 34.9033.675.8656.36 8.50d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]5.707.75 52.58 C CD CDCAEAMovement LOS AAD 34.52 37.18d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]11.889.06 C DBApproach LOS A 12.84d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.279Intersection V/C Other Modes 0.0 11.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 11.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 0.00 1023.37M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]1160.32 1172.03 0.00 34.6734.67d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]34.67 0.000 2.259I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.9603.178 F BCrosswalk LOS CC 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 456 4561000c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1000 26.90 26.90d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]11.28 11.28 1.598 1.827I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.988 2.183 A ABBicycle LOS A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E5 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with ALevel Of Service: 3.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: RoundaboutControl Type: Intersection 2: Hazelton & Site Driveway Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] Right2RightThruLeftU-turnRightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Intersection Setup 555Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 07992601115021161400170Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02257033810430040Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.880Peak Hour Factor 06872301013221141200150Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 06872301013221141200150Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Volumes Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E6 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 3.72Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 3.583.903.44Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.4411.992.1395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.340.480.0995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.100.140.03X, volume / capacity 130313031123Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 133013301146Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 13518432Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 07992601115021161400170Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 06872301013221141200150Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 16313527Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 3737183Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 111Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E7 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with YesYesCrosswalk 0.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 0000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration SoutheastboundSouthwestboundApproach Business AccessSite AccessName Intersection Setup 55Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 20100000000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1030000000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.8800Peak Hour Factor 2090000000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2090000000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Business AccessSite AccessName Volumes Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E8 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 3.72Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAApproach LOS 3.223.16Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.790.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.030.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.010.00X, volume / capacity 11481138Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 11711162Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 130Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 20100000000Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 2090000000Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 82Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 161169Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 11Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E9 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.259Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 3: York Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report NoYesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00765.00100.00100.00275.00100.00175.00100.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0550v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0550v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 41451117063549301745386Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10113318161377411322Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.8100Peak Hour Factor 3134195751445241436770Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 10014001700500Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.101.752.402.200.003.803.601.600.702.102.001.40Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4135595768445241936770Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Volumes Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E10 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0270025001500100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.53.00.03.53.0Vehicle Extension [s] 025002500601506015Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 020002000551005510Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lag--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E11 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 7.8646.0874.6518.8589.0234.5966.0066.5897.0195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.311.842.990.753.561.382.642.663.8895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 4.3625.6041.4710.4749.4519.2136.6736.9953.8950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.171.021.660.421.980.771.471.482.1650th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group CDDAADAADLane Group LOS 34.0035.4136.316.207.1351.075.875.8651.71d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.040.250.300.060.240.540.190.190.76X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.080.620.630.130.258.010.340.3310.14d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.110.500.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 33.9234.7935.686.076.8843.065.535.5341.57d1, Uniform Delay [s] 21020626897422885512401258113c, Capacity [veh/h] 112115211427152135721800184318701790s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.010.030.060.040.150.020.130.130.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.130.130.130.640.640.030.670.670.06g / C, Green / Cycle 1212125858361616g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 909090909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] CRCRCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E12 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 36.31 35.4136.31 34.00 34.0034.006.2051.71 5.86d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]7.135.87 51.07 D DD CCCADAMovement LOS AAD 35.96 34.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]9.0912.95 D CAApproach LOS B 13.51d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.259Intersection V/C Other Modes 9.0 0.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 682.89 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]887.59 895.39 36.45 0.0036.45d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.45 2.063 0.000I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.8032.582 B FCrosswalk LOS CB 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 456 4561222c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1222 26.90 26.90d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]6.82 6.82 1.801 1.576I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.022 2.103 A ABBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E13 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E14 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Scenario 1: 1 AM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E15 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 1/31/2018Report File: C:\...\PM Existing.pdf Scenario 2 PM ExistingVistro File: C:\...\Hazelton Vistro - Updates.vistro 3650 Hazelton Road V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C24.40.447SB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedYork Avenue & Hazelton Road3 A5.5EB ThruHCM 6th EditionRoundaboutHazelton & Site Driveway2 B13.80.465NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedFrance Avenue & Hazelton Road1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E16 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.465Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: France Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 125.00100.00125.00100.00100.0075.00100.00100.00225.00300.00100.00150.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 124241363261761010187136133611Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 31634174225347343343Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.9830Peak Hour Factor 12224134326176993184134131311Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 41002002004500Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.001.003.753.501.800.001.251.301.253.751.253.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 16324134526178993184179131311Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Volumes Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E17 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0250028001300190Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070070070Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 030003000803008030Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 025002500752507525Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 140Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E18 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 189.3733.72215.5240.9024.7513.289.24280.5432.79108.8521.7395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 7.571.358.621.640.990.530.3711.221.314.350.8795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 105.2418.74124.1522.7213.757.385.14172.7618.2260.4712.0750th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 4.210.754.970.910.550.300.216.910.732.420.4850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group EDEDEAAEAAFLane Group LOS 57.5452.0964.4552.3055.360.690.4870.954.405.0083.78d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.540.090.660.110.080.250.250.880.140.410.49X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.331.331.331.331.331.33Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.940.143.490.180.150.440.2312.920.290.3915.43d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.110.110.110.500.500.130.500.500.11k, delay calibration 55.6051.9660.9652.1255.200.250.2558.034.114.6268.36d1, Uniform Delay [s] 23127120726521713872648212994325023c, Capacity [veh/h] 16021885136118391409187535801792156751241767s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.080.010.100.020.010.190.190.100.090.260.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.140.140.140.140.140.740.740.120.630.630.01g / C, Green / Cycle 20202020201041041789892g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 140140140140140140140140140140140C, Cycle Length [s] RCLCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E19 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 52.30 52.3055.36 64.45 57.5452.090.6983.78 5.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.554.40 70.95 D DE EEDAFAMovement LOS AAE 53.43 60.39d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]11.505.53 D EBApproach LOS A 13.81d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.465Intersection V/C Other Modes 0.0 11.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 11.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 0.00 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 59.4359.43d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]59.43 0.000 2.386I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.1483.439 F BCrosswalk LOS CC 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 364 3641071c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1071 46.82 46.82d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]15.09 15.09 1.639 2.096I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.400 2.222 A BBBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E20 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with ALevel Of Service: 5.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: RoundaboutControl Type: Intersection 2: Hazelton & Site Driveway Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] Right2RightThruLeftU-turnRightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Intersection Setup 555Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 14324873215309141393811330Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 31621814773010100080Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.944Peak Hour Factor 13323469214292131373611310Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 13323469214292131373611310Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Volumes Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E21 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 5.50Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 5.415.894.76Approach Delay [s/veh] 28.2933.716.6195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.131.350.2695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.280.310.08X, volume / capacity 12331209900Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 12581234918Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 34738675Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 14324873215309141393811330Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 13323469214292131373611310Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 34534081Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 91110400Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 111Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E22 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with YesYesCrosswalk 0.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 0000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration SoutheastboundSouthwestboundApproach Business AccessSite AccessName Intersection Setup 55Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1151900013180Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3150003020Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.9440Peak Hour Factor 1051800012180Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1051800012180Base Volume Input [veh/h] Business AccessSite AccessName Volumes Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E23 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 5.50Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAApproach LOS 4.484.26Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.121.9095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.120.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.040.02X, volume / capacity 877892Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 895911Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 3623Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 1151900013180Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 1051800012180Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 515Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 425408Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 11Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E24 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.447Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 24.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 3: York Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report NoYesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00765.00100.00100.00275.00100.00175.00100.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0550v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0550v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 231012972188104682224747174Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 63324147261716118743Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.9790Peak Hour Factor 231012952184102668224731170Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 80032003500200Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1.101.752.402.200.003.803.601.600.702.102.001.40Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3110121272184137668226731170Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Volumes Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E25 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0270025001500100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.53.00.03.53.0Vehicle Extension [s] 040004000703007030Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 035003500652506525Maximum Green [s] 050050055055Minimum Green [s] --------Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 140Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E26 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 62.05137.38281.8264.41226.5541.28192.88193.13272.6495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.485.5011.272.589.061.657.727.7310.9195th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 34.4776.32173.7435.78132.2522.93107.76107.94166.7550th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.383.056.951.435.290.924.314.326.6750th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group DDEBBFAAELane Group LOS 49.1850.8261.3111.9913.9480.998.738.7372.19d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.180.350.710.110.320.580.290.290.87X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.340.765.460.250.3813.090.560.5611.00d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.170.500.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 48.8450.0755.8511.7413.5567.908.168.1661.18d1, Uniform Delay [s] 24927726891921583812961299200c, Capacity [veh/h] 120015331200152035721800186618701790s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.040.060.160.070.190.010.200.200.10(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.180.180.180.600.600.020.700.700.11g / C, Green / Cycle 25252585853979716g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 140140140140140140140140140C, Cycle Length [s] CRCRCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E27 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 61.31 50.8261.31 49.18 49.1849.1811.9972.19 8.73d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]13.948.73 80.99 E DE DDDBEAMovement LOS BAF 57.77 49.18d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.5120.67 E DBApproach LOS C 24.43d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CIntersection LOS 0.447Intersection V/C Other Modes 9.0 0.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 272.44 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]456.50 354.95 61.29 0.0061.29d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]61.29 2.217 0.000I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.1352.740 B FCrosswalk LOS CB 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 507 507929c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]929 39.10 39.10d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]20.14 20.14 2.086 1.647I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.324 2.255 B ABBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E28 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E29 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Scenario 2: 2 PM Existing Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E30 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 1/31/2018Report File: C:\...\AM 2020 No Build.pdf Scenario 3 AM 2020 No BuildVistro File: C:\...\Hazelton Vistro - Updates.vistro 3650 Hazelton Road V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B13.60.265NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedYork Avenue & Hazelton Road3 A3.7EB ThruHCM 6th EditionRoundaboutHazelton & Site Driveway2 B12.90.284NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedFrance Avenue & Hazelton Road1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E31 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.284Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 12.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: France Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 125.00100.00125.00100.00100.0075.00100.00100.00225.00300.00100.00150.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 5005v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 5005v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 471188211999921527368910Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 12322132224838181722Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 43108121088913140676349Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 19001003002200Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 1.001.003.753.501.800.001.251.301.253.751.253.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 611079310811895137876229Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E32 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0250028001300190Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070070070Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 025002500501505015Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 020002000451004510Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lag--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E33 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 42.019.5084.6711.258.0492.9985.16173.9525.1982.6313.2095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.680.383.390.450.323.723.416.961.013.310.5395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 23.345.2847.046.254.4751.6647.3196.6413.9945.917.3450th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.930.211.880.250.182.071.893.870.561.840.2950th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group CCDCDAADAAELane Group LOS 34.9233.6638.9133.7235.645.905.6653.097.838.6156.36d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.220.040.380.050.040.270.270.820.080.230.43X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.520.071.020.080.060.510.2713.550.170.1712.28d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.110.110.110.500.500.180.500.500.11k, delay calibration 34.4033.5937.9033.6435.575.395.3939.547.668.4444.08d1, Uniform Delay [s] 21326123225123912862461185906306023c, Capacity [veh/h] 15371885135418101398187135801792151851241767s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.030.010.060.010.010.180.180.080.050.130.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.140.140.140.140.140.690.690.100.600.600.01g / C, Green / Cycle 12121212126262954541g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 9090909090909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCLCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E34 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 33.72 33.7235.64 38.91 34.9233.665.9056.36 8.61d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]5.747.83 53.09 C CD CDCAEAMovement LOS AAD 34.50 37.23d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]11.989.15 C DBApproach LOS A 12.94d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.284Intersection V/C Other Modes 0.0 11.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 11.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 0.00 1019.76M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]1158.17 1170.84 0.00 34.6734.67d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]34.67 0.000 2.261I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.9673.186 F BCrosswalk LOS CC 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 456 4561000c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1000 26.90 26.90d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]11.28 11.28 1.598 1.832I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.996 2.195 A ABBicycle LOS A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E35 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with ALevel Of Service: 3.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: RoundaboutControl Type: Intersection 2: Hazelton & Site Driveway Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] Right2RightThruLeftU-turnRightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Intersection Setup 555Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 071012601115321161400170Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 02257033810430040Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.880Peak Hour Factor 06892301013521141200150Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 06872301013221141200150Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E36 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 3.73Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 3.603.923.45Approach Delay [s/veh] 8.5812.222.1495th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.340.490.0995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.100.140.03X, volume / capacity 130313031119Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 133013301142Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 13718732Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 071012601115321161400170Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 06892301013521141200150Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 16613727Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 3737186Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 111Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E37 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with YesYesCrosswalk 0.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 0000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration SoutheastboundSouthwestboundApproach Business AccessSite AccessName Intersection Setup 55Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 20100000000Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1030000000Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.8800Peak Hour Factor 2090000000Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2090000000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Business AccessSite AccessName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E38 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 3.73Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAApproach LOS 3.233.17Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.790.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.030.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.010.00X, volume / capacity 11451136Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 11691159Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 130Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 20100000000Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 2090000000Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 82Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 163171Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 11Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E39 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.265Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 13.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 3: York Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report NoYesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00765.00100.00100.00275.00100.00175.00100.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0550v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0550v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 41452117264560301746288Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10113318161407411522Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.8100Peak Hour Factor 3134295852454241437471Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 10014001700500Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 1.101.752.402.200.003.803.601.600.702.102.001.40Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4135595768445241936770Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Volumes Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E40 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0270025001500100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.53.00.03.53.0Vehicle Extension [s] 025002500601506015Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 020002000551005510Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lag--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E41 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 7.8647.0076.6819.2991.7634.5967.5468.1399.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.311.883.070.773.671.382.702.733.9695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 4.3626.1142.6010.7250.9819.2137.5237.8555.0050th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.171.041.700.432.040.771.501.512.2050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group CDDAADAADLane Group LOS 33.9935.4336.406.267.2351.075.905.8951.51d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.040.250.310.070.250.540.190.190.76X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.090.630.660.130.268.010.350.3410.00d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.110.500.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 33.9034.7935.756.136.9743.065.555.5541.50d1, Uniform Delay [s] 20720726797222825512401258115c, Capacity [veh/h] 110115211415152135721800184318701790s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.010.030.060.040.160.020.130.130.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.140.140.140.640.640.030.670.670.06g / C, Green / Cycle 1212125858361616g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 909090909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] CRCRCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E42 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 36.40 35.4336.40 33.99 33.9933.996.2651.51 5.89d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]7.235.90 51.07 D DD CCCADAMovement LOS AAD 36.03 33.99d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]9.1412.97 D CAApproach LOS B 13.56d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.265Intersection V/C Other Modes 9.0 0.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 680.27 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]886.04 892.70 36.45 0.0036.45d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.45 2.065 0.000I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.8102.588 B FCrosswalk LOS CB 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 456 4561222c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1222 26.90 26.90d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]6.82 6.82 1.805 1.576I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.032 2.113 A ABBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E43 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E44 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E45 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume Scenario 3: 3 AM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E46 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 1/31/2018Report File: C:\...\PM 2020 No Build.pdf Scenario 4 PM 2020 No BuildVistro File: C:\...\Hazelton Vistro - Updates.vistro 3650 Hazelton Road V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C24.60.455SB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedYork Avenue & Hazelton Road3 A5.6EB ThruHCM 6th EditionRoundaboutHazelton & Site Driveway2 B14.00.475NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedFrance Avenue & Hazelton Road1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E47 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.475Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: France Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 125.00100.00125.00100.00100.0075.00100.00100.00225.00300.00100.00150.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 127241393271761031191140136211Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 32635174225848353413Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.9830Peak Hour Factor 125241373271761013188138133911Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 41002002004500Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 1.001.003.753.501.800.001.251.301.253.751.253.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 16324134526178993184179131311Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E48 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0250028001300190Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070070070Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 030003000803008030Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 025002500752507525Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 140Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E49 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 192.6933.60219.7842.1924.6615.1510.92286.6735.24116.5521.7395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 7.711.348.791.690.990.610.4411.471.414.660.8795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 107.6218.67127.2723.4413.708.426.06177.4419.5864.7512.0750th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 4.300.755.090.940.550.340.247.100.782.590.4850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group EDEDEAAEAAFLane Group LOS 57.3051.7764.6052.0155.010.770.5671.504.655.3283.78d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.540.090.660.110.080.260.260.890.140.420.49X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.331.331.331.331.331.33Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.930.133.790.180.150.450.2413.680.300.4115.43d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.120.110.110.500.500.130.500.500.11k, delay calibration 55.3751.6460.8051.8354.860.320.3257.824.354.9168.36d1, Uniform Delay [s] 23527621027022113822639216987322623c, Capacity [veh/h] 16021885136018411409187535801792156751241767s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.080.010.100.020.010.190.190.110.090.270.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.150.150.150.150.150.740.740.120.630.630.01g / C, Green / Cycle 21212121211031031788882g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 140140140140140140140140140140140C, Cycle Length [s] RCLCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E50 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 52.01 52.0155.01 64.60 57.3051.770.7783.78 5.32d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.634.65 71.50 D DE EEDAFAMovement LOS AAE 53.09 60.34d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]11.665.83 D EBApproach LOS A 14.01d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.475Intersection V/C Other Modes 0.0 11.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 11.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 0.00 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 59.4359.43d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]59.43 0.000 2.389I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.1583.452 F BCrosswalk LOS CC 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 364 3641071c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1071 46.82 46.82d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]15.09 15.09 1.640 2.106I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.417 2.236 A BBBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E51 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with ALevel Of Service: 5.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: RoundaboutControl Type: Intersection 2: Hazelton & Site Driveway Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] Right2RightThruLeftU-turnRightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Intersection Setup 555Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 14325374215316141403911340Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 31631914793010100080Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.944Peak Hour Factor 13323970214298131383711320Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 13323469214292131373611310Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E52 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 5.57Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 5.485.984.83Approach Delay [s/veh] 29.0534.796.8795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.161.390.2795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.280.320.08X, volume / capacity 12301208892Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 12561233911Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 35339477Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 14325374215316141403911340Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 13323970214298131383711320Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 35234782Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 93111408Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 111Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E53 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with YesYesCrosswalk 0.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 0000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration SoutheastboundSouthwestboundApproach Business AccessSite AccessName Intersection Setup 55Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 1151900013180Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3150003020Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.9440Peak Hour Factor 1051800012180Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1051800012180Base Volume Input [veh/h] Business AccessSite AccessName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E54 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 5.57Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAApproach LOS 4.524.30Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.141.9195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.130.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.040.02X, volume / capacity 869885Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 887903Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 3623Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 1151900013180Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 1051800012180Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 515Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 434416Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 11Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E55 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.455Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 24.6Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 3: York Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report NoYesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00765.00100.00100.00275.00100.00175.00100.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0550v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0550v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 2510121002192107696224762177Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 63325148271746119144Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.9790Peak Hour Factor 241012982188105681224746173Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 80032003500200Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 1.101.752.402.200.003.803.601.600.702.102.001.40Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3110121272184137668226731170Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Volumes Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E56 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0270025001500100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.53.00.03.53.0Vehicle Extension [s] 040004000703007030Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 035003500652506525Maximum Green [s] 050050055055Minimum Green [s] --------Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 140Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E57 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 64.67141.36287.4667.35233.7640.91198.75199.01276.1995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.595.6511.502.699.351.647.957.9611.0595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 35.9378.53178.0437.41137.5822.73111.98112.17169.4550th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.443.147.121.505.500.914.484.496.7850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group DDEBBEAAELane Group LOS 48.9350.5861.5112.3114.3579.818.988.9871.97d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.190.360.720.120.330.560.300.300.87X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.350.765.830.260.4011.990.590.5910.92d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.180.500.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 48.5849.8255.6812.0513.9467.818.398.3961.05d1, Uniform Delay [s] 25228127191121413912901293203c, Capacity [veh/h] 120015331200152035721800186618701790s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.040.070.160.070.190.010.210.210.10(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.180.180.180.600.600.020.690.690.11g / C, Green / Cycle 26262684843979716g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 140140140140140140140140140C, Cycle Length [s] CRCRCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E58 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 61.51 50.5861.51 48.93 48.9348.9312.3171.97 8.98d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.358.98 79.81 E DE DDDBEAMovement LOS BAE 57.79 48.93d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.8320.80 E DBApproach LOS C 24.64d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CIntersection LOS 0.455Intersection V/C Other Modes 9.0 0.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 264.60 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]451.87 346.86 61.29 0.0061.29d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]61.29 2.221 0.000I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.1482.748 B FCrosswalk LOS CB 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 507 507929c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]929 39.10 39.10d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]20.14 20.14 2.098 1.650I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.339 2.269 B ABBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E59 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E60 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E61 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E62 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume Scenario 4: 4 PM 2020 No Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E63 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 1/31/2018Report File: C:\...\AM 2020 Build.pdf Scenario 5 AM 2020 BuildVistro File: C:\...\Hazelton Vistro - Updates.vistro 3650 Hazelton Road V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. B14.10.278NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedYork Avenue & Hazelton Road3 A3.8EB ThruHCM 6th EditionRoundaboutHazelton & Site Driveway2 B14.00.300NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedFrance Avenue & Hazelton Road1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E64 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.300Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: France Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 125.00100.00125.00100.00100.0075.00100.00100.00225.00300.00100.00150.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 5005v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 5005v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 6412105211999921587768910Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 16326132224839191722Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.92000.9200Peak Hour Factor 59119721088913145716349Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 19001003002300Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 16116000005500Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 1.001.003.753.501.800.001.251.301.253.751.253.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 611079310811895137876229Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Volumes Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E65 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0250028001300190Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070070070Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 025002500501505015Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 020002000451004510Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lag--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E66 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 56.6210.14100.9711.007.92100.2491.98183.3628.4088.2513.4895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.260.414.040.440.324.013.687.331.143.530.5495th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 31.455.6356.096.114.4055.6951.10101.8715.7849.037.4950th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.260.232.240.240.182.232.044.070.631.960.3050th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group CCDCCAADAAELane Group LOS 34.2432.5538.6632.5934.836.426.1654.148.579.3957.98d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.270.040.430.050.040.270.270.830.090.230.45X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.610.061.160.070.060.540.2814.750.200.1813.85d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.110.110.110.500.500.190.500.500.11k, delay calibration 33.6332.4937.5032.5234.775.885.8839.398.389.2044.13d1, Uniform Delay [s] 23628824727725312602411191879296922c, Capacity [veh/h] 15411885135718111400187135801792151851241767s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.040.010.080.010.010.180.180.090.050.130.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.150.150.150.150.150.670.670.110.580.580.01g / C, Green / Cycle 141414141461611052521g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 9090909090909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] RCLCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E67 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 32.59 32.5934.83 38.66 34.2432.556.4257.98 9.39d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]6.248.57 54.14 C CC CDCAEAMovement LOS AAD 33.50 36.69d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]12.789.93 C DBApproach LOS A 13.98d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.300Intersection V/C Other Modes 0.0 11.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 11.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 0.00 1012.54M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]1139.87 1150.48 0.00 34.6734.67d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]34.67 0.000 2.272I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.9713.216 F BCrosswalk LOS CC 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 456 4561000c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1000 26.90 26.90d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]11.28 11.28 1.598 1.890I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 1.999 2.199 A ABBicycle LOS A ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E68 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with ALevel Of Service: 3.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: RoundaboutControl Type: Intersection 2: Hazelton & Site Driveway Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] Right2RightThruLeftU-turnRightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Intersection Setup 555Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 7710126011153111161400170Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 22257033830430040Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.8800.880Peak Hour Factor 668923010135101141200150Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000-20000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 6000000100000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 06872301013221141200150Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Volumes Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E69 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 3.83Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 3.684.083.56Approach Delay [s/veh] 9.1813.272.2195th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.370.530.0995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.110.150.03X, volume / capacity 129112731084Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 131713001106Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 14419632Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 7710126011153111161400170Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 668923010135101141200150Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 18917527Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 4659217Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 111Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E70 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with YesYesCrosswalk 0.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 0000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration SoutheastboundSouthwestboundApproach Business AccessSite AccessName Intersection Setup 55Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 2010000380220Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 1030009050Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.88000.8800Peak Hour Factor 209000330190Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000330190Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 2090000000Base Volume Input [veh/h] Business AccessSite AccessName Volumes Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E71 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 3.83Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAApproach LOS 3.443.61Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.854.1895th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.030.1795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.010.05X, volume / capacity 10761136Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 10981159Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 1362Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 2010000380220Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 209000330190Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 811Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 224171Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 11Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E72 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.278Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 3: York Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report NoYesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00765.00100.00100.00275.00100.00175.00100.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0550v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0550v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 41460118467560301746291Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 10115321171407411523Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.81000.8100Peak Hour Factor 3134996854454241437474Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 10016001800500Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0009010300003Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 1.101.752.402.200.003.803.601.600.702.102.001.40Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 4135595768445241936770Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Volumes Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E73 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0270025001500100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.53.00.03.53.0Vehicle Extension [s] 025002500601506015Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 020002000551005510Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lag--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 90Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E74 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 7.8654.4989.2520.5193.0234.5967.9568.54101.9995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.312.183.570.823.721.382.722.744.0895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 4.3730.2749.5811.3951.6819.2137.7538.0856.6650th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.171.211.980.462.070.771.511.522.2750th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group CDDAADAADLane Group LOS 33.9635.6337.066.397.3651.075.945.9351.21d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.050.290.370.070.250.540.190.190.77X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.100.750.860.140.268.010.350.349.82d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.110.500.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 33.8634.8836.196.257.1043.065.605.5941.40d1, Uniform Delay [s] 19120926096722705512371255119c, Capacity [veh/h] 96915211344152135721800184318701790s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.010.040.070.040.160.020.130.130.05(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.140.140.140.640.640.030.670.670.07g / C, Green / Cycle 1212125757361616g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 909090909090909090C, Cycle Length [s] CRCRCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E75 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 37.06 35.6337.06 33.96 33.9633.966.3951.21 5.94d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]7.365.94 51.07 D DD CCCADAMovement LOS AAD 36.50 33.96d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]9.2513.17 D CAApproach LOS B 14.05d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.278Intersection V/C Other Modes 9.0 0.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 672.42 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]873.69 876.51 36.45 0.0036.45d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]36.45 2.078 0.000I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 2.8322.591 B FCrosswalk LOS CB 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 456 4561222c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1222 26.90 26.90d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]6.82 6.82 1.842 1.576I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.034 2.116 A ABBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E76 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E77 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E78 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E79 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume Scenario 5: 5 AM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E80 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 1/31/2018Report File: C:\...\PM 2020 Build.pdf Scenario 6 PM 2020 BuildVistro File: C:\...\Hazelton Vistro - Updates.vistro 3650 Hazelton Road V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. C24.80.458SB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedYork Avenue & Hazelton Road3 A5.8EB ThruHCM 6th EditionRoundaboutHazelton & Site Driveway2 B14.70.484NB LeftHCM 6th EditionSignalizedFrance Avenue & Hazelton Road1 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E81 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.484Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 14.7Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 1: France Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report YesNoYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0040.0040.00Speed [mph] 125.00100.00125.00100.00100.0075.00100.00100.00225.00300.00100.00150.00Pocket Length [ft] 101001001101No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0000v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0000v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 0000v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 0000v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 132231443271761031201151136211Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 33636174225850383413Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.98300.9830Peak Hour Factor 130231423271761013198148133911Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 40002002004600Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] -6-1-50-1000-7-600Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 1001001000171700Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 1.001.003.753.501.800.001.251.301.253.751.253.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 16324134526178993184179131311Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdFrance AveFrance AveName Volumes Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E82 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMaximum Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0250028001300190Pedestrian Clearance [s] 070070070070Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Vehicle Extension [s] 030003000803008030Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 025002500752507525Maximum Green [s] 0100010003050305Minimum Green [s] --------Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 140Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E83 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 198.4232.04226.8941.9924.5317.2112.86301.9941.09126.4721.7395th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 7.941.289.081.680.980.690.5112.081.645.060.8795th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 111.7417.80132.5023.3313.639.567.15189.2022.8370.2612.0750th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 4.470.715.300.930.550.380.297.570.912.810.4850th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoNoNoNoYesNoYesNoCritical Lane Group EDEDDAAEAAFLane Group LOS 57.0751.3264.8651.5854.500.870.6572.815.155.8683.78d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.550.080.670.110.080.260.260.890.160.430.49X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.331.331.331.331.331.33Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 1.950.124.300.170.140.460.2415.500.340.4215.43d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.130.110.110.500.500.160.500.500.11k, delay calibration 55.1251.2060.5651.4154.360.410.4157.324.815.4468.36d1, Uniform Delay [s] 24028321527622613762627225973318023c, Capacity [veh/h] 16021885136018411410187535801792156751241767s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.080.010.110.020.010.190.190.110.100.270.01(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.150.150.150.150.150.730.730.130.620.620.01g / C, Green / Cycle 21212121211031031887872g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.000.002.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 140140140140140140140140140140140C, Cycle Length [s] RCLCLCCLRCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E84 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 51.58 51.5854.50 64.86 57.0751.320.8783.78 5.86d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]0.735.15 72.81 D DD EEDAFAMovement LOS AAE 52.64 60.38d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]12.436.36 D EBApproach LOS A 14.67d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] BIntersection LOS 0.484Intersection V/C Other Modes 0.0 11.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]11.0 11.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 0.00 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.00 0.00 0.00 59.4359.43d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]59.43 0.000 2.395I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.1603.464 F BCrosswalk LOS CC 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 364 3641071c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]1071 46.82 46.82d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]15.09 15.09 1.640 2.119I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.423 2.242 A BBBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E85 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with ALevel Of Service: 5.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: RoundaboutControl Type: Intersection 2: Hazelton & Site Driveway Intersection Level Of Service Report YesYesYesCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] Right2RightThruLeftU-turnRightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Intersection Setup 555Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 21325374215316361403901340Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 51631914799010100080Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.9440.944Peak Hour Factor 20323970214298341383701320Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] -14000000-14000-1000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 21000000350000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 13323469214292131373611310Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdBusiness AccessName Volumes Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E86 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 5.79Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 5.706.234.97Approach Delay [s/veh] 30.7838.016.9995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.231.520.2895th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.290.340.09X, volume / capacity 12041201867Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 12291226885Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 36141776Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 21325374215316361403901340Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 20323970214298341383701320Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 35835581Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 114116437Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 111Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E87 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with YesYesCrosswalk 0.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 0000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftLeft2U-turnRight2RightThruLeftU-turnTurning Movement Lane Configuration SoutheastboundSouthwestboundApproach Business AccessSite AccessName Intersection Setup 55Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 11519000210140Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 3150005030Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.94400.9440Peak Hour Factor 10518000200130Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000-12-1-80Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 0000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000200130Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 0000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 2.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1051800012180Base Volume Input [veh/h] Business AccessSite AccessName Volumes Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E88 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with AIntersection LOS 5.79Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAApproach LOS 4.584.44Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.193.0995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.130.1295th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AALane LOS Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0.040.04X, volume / capacity 858885Capacity per Entry Lane [veh/h] 1.001.00Pedestrian Impedance 875903Capacity of Entry and Bypass Lanes [veh/h] 3636Entry Flow Rate [veh/h] 0.980.98HV Adjustment Factor 0.001020.00102B (coefficient) 1380.001380.00A (intercept) 3.003.00User-Defined Follow-Up Time [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Follow-Up Time 4.004.00User-Defined Critical Headway [s] NoNoOverwrite Calculated Critical Headway Lanes 11519000210140Adjusted Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 10518000200130Demand Flow Rate [veh/h] 537Exiting Flow Rate [veh/h] 447416Circulating Flow Rate [veh/h] 11Number of Conflicting Circulating Lanes Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E89 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0.458Volume to Capacity (v/c): CLevel Of Service: 24.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM 6th EditionAnalysis Method: SignalizedControl Type: Intersection 3: York Avenue & Hazelton Road Intersection Level Of Service Report NoYesYesYesCrosswalk NoNoNoNoCurb Present 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0035.0035.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00100.00765.00100.00100.00275.00100.00175.00100.00100.00160.00Pocket Length [ft] 000100101001No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Intersection Setup 5555Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 5555v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0550v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi 0550v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 5555v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m 5555v_do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing 000000000000Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 000000000000On-Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoPresence of On-Street Parking 2510121032194112696224762179Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 63326149281746119145Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.97900.9790Peak Hour Factor 2410121012190110681224746175Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 80032003500200Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000-30-5-60000-8Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 00060711000010Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.021.02Growth Rate 1.101.752.402.200.003.803.601.600.702.102.001.40Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 3110121272184137668226731170Base Volume Input [veh/h] Hazelton RdHazelton RdYork AveYork AveName Volumes Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E90 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 0Pedestrian Clearance [s] 0Pedestrian Walk [s] 0Pedestrian Signal Group Exclusive Pedestrian Phase 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Length [ft] 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Detector Location [ft] NoNoNoNoNoNoPedestrian Recall NoNoNoNoNoNoMaximum Recall NoNoYesNoYesNoMinimum Recall 0.02.50.00.02.50.00.03.03.00.03.03.0l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.02.00.00.02.00.00.02.02.00.02.02.0l1, Start-Up Lost Time [s] NoNoNoNoRest In Walk 0270025001500100Pedestrian Clearance [s] 050050050050Walk [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.53.00.03.53.0Vehicle Extension [s] 040004000703007030Split [s] 0.01.50.00.01.50.00.02.02.00.02.02.0All red [s] 0.03.00.00.03.00.00.03.03.00.03.03.0Amber [s] 035003500652506525Maximum Green [s] 050050055055Minimum Green [s] --------Lead--LeadLead / Lag Auxiliary Signal Groups 047083061025Signal group PermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissPermissProtectePermissPermissProtecteControl Type Phasing & Timing 0.00Lost time [s] SingleBandPermissive Mode LeadGreenOffset Reference 0.0Offset [s] Fully actuatedActuation Type Time of Day Pattern CoordinatedCoordination Type 140Cycle Length [s] -Signal Coordination Group NoLocated in CBD Intersection Settings Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E91 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with 64.54145.63290.2971.29235.2140.91199.68199.94278.6795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 2.585.8311.612.859.411.647.998.0011.1595th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] 35.8680.90180.2139.61138.6522.73112.65112.84171.3450th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 1.433.247.211.585.550.914.514.516.8550th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] NoNoYesNoYesNoNoNoYesCritical Lane Group DDEBBEAAELane Group LOS 48.7650.5361.6212.5214.5379.819.069.0671.91d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 0.190.360.720.120.330.560.300.300.87X, volume / capacity Lane Group Results 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00PF, progression factor 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Rp, platoon ratio 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.350.786.030.280.4111.990.590.5910.94d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00I, Upstream Filtering Factor 0.110.110.190.500.500.110.500.500.11k, delay calibration 48.4149.7555.6012.2414.1267.818.478.4760.97d1, Uniform Delay [s] 25428327390721333912871290205c, Capacity [veh/h] 120015331200152035721800186618701790s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 0.040.070.160.070.190.010.210.210.10(v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.180.180.180.600.600.020.690.690.11g / C, Green / Cycle 26262684843979716g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 2.502.502.503.003.003.003.003.003.00l2, Clearance Lost Time [s] 2.000.002.000.000.000.000.000.000.00l1_p, Permitted Start-Up Lost Time [s] 4.504.504.505.005.005.005.005.005.00L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 140140140140140140140140140C, Cycle Length [s] CRCRCLCCLLane Group Lane Group Calculations Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E92 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 61.62 50.5361.62 48.76 48.7648.7612.5271.91 9.06d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh]14.539.06 79.81 E DE DDDBEAMovement LOS BAE 57.80 48.76d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh]15.9920.96 E DBApproach LOS C 24.82d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] CIntersection LOS 0.458Intersection V/C Other Modes 9.0 0.0g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s]9.0 9.0 0.00 0.00M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft²/ped]0.000.00 251.54 0.00M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft²/ped]447.25 344.17 61.29 0.0061.29d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s]61.29 2.225 0.000I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersection 3.1522.749 B FCrosswalk LOS CB 2000 20002000s_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 507 507929c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h]929 39.10 39.10d_b, Bicycle Delay [s]20.14 20.14 2.106 1.650I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.341 2.273 B ABBicycle LOS B ----------------Ring 4 ----------------Ring 3 ------------8-65Ring 2 ------------4-21Ring 1 Sequence Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E93 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E94 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E95 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E96 Spack Consulting Version 5.00-03 Generated with Traffic Volume - Future Total Volume Scenario 6: 6 PM 2020 Build Appendix E: Capacity Analysis Backup 3650 Hazelton Road Traffic Impact Study E97 Spack Consulting One SE Main Street, Suite 204, Minneapolis, MN 55414 888.232.5512 www.SpackConsulting.com Technical Memorandum To: Cary Teague, Community Development Director – City of Edina From: Bryant Ficek, PE, PTOE Date: March 7, 2018 Re: 3650 Hazelton - Parking Review Spack Consulting completed a traffic study for a proposed high-rise apartment development located at 3650 Hazelton Road in Edina, Minnesota in February 2018. This technical memorandum is an addendum to that study, providing a review of parking. The purpose is to determine the adequacy of the proposed off-street parking. To that end, this memorandum documents the proposed supply of off-street parking, examine the City code requirements for parking, and review the expected parking demand for the site. Conclusions The principal findings of this technical memorandum are: The proposed high-rise apartment development will provide 298 parking stalls based on the February 23, 2018 site plan. The City of Edina code requires two fully enclosed spaces per dwelling unit or 372 parking spaces. Peak parking demand based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ national data is expected to be 255 occupied stalls during a typical weekday. Peak parking demand based on Spack Consulting local data for similar residential development is expected to be 147 occupied stalls during a typical weekday, 79 occupied spaces on a typical Saturday, and 62 occupied stalls on a typical Sunday. Based on the above findings, we expect the proposed parking supply to adequately accommodate the parking needs even though it does not satisfy the City’s requirements. Site Characteristics The development site is located at the current Guitar Center site on Hazelton Road. The high-rise apartment development is proposed to house 186 dwelling units in 19 levels for approximately 260 new residents. The current planned parking is 298 stalls in a fully-enclosed parking garage, a rate of 1.60 stalls per unit, to accommodate both residents of the building and their guests. The proposed site plan is attached in the Appendix. Spack Consulting 2 of 2 3650 Hazelton Parking Review One SE Main Street, Suite 204, Minneapolis, MN 55414 888.232.5512 www.SpackConsulting.com Parking Review City of Edina Code Per Section 36-1311 of the City of Edina Code of Ordinances, the proposed residential development is required to provide two fully enclosed parking spaces per dwelling unit. With 186 dwelling units, the required parking for the proposed development is 372 parking stalls. Based on the current site plan, the proposed development is short of the require spaces by 74 stalls (372 required against 298 provided). Expected Demand A parking generation analysis was performed for the proposed site based on the methods and average rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Parking Generation, 4th Edition. The ITE Parking Generation is an informational report of compiled parking studies for existing developments throughout the United States. Using the supplied data for a high-rise apartment building, Table 1 shows the weekday parking generation of the proposed development based on the number of dwelling units. Spack Consulting also collects local data to supplement the national ITE data. Local data better reflects our region’s driving habits and can be a more reliable indicator of demand. Table 1 also presented our local parking generation for similar residential developments. Table 1 – Weekday Peak Period Parking Demand – High-Rise Apartment Source - Land Use Code Development Description (size) Peak Parking Occupied Stalls Weekday Saturday Sunday 222 High-Rise Apartment (186 Dwelling Units) 255 N/A N/A Local1 Apartment (186 Dwelling Units) 147 79 62 1 Local = Parking generation data collected by Spack Consulting. The national and local data both suggest the peak demand for the proposed residential development will be less than the proposed supply. Thus, we expect the proposed parking supply to accommodate peak parking demand adequately. Appendix A. Site Plan Appendix A - Site Plan Spack Consulting A1 3650 Hazelton Parking Review RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING DENSITY IN THE MXC, MIXED USE CENTER DISTRICT AND HEIGHT IN THE GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA AND THE MXC, MIXED USE CENTER DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 3650 Hazelton, LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.25 acre parcel at 3650 Hazelton Road. 1.02 The specific proposal is to tear down the existing Guitar Center building and build a 19-story, 186 unit luxury apartment with underground parking. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density in the MXC, Mixed Use Center in the Greater Southdale Area from 100 units per acre to 150 units per acre; and Flexibility language within the Comprehensive Plan to allow the City to approve projects that would exceed the Comprehensive Plan height requirements through rezoning or variance in the Greater Southdale Area and the MXC, Mixed Use Center. 1.04 On March 28, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 4 Ayes and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The City’s Zoning Ordinance was amended to reflect all heights recommended in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan; therefore the City would not lose its regulatory control over height. 2. Building height is typically a function of Zoning regulations and not a Comprehensive Plan. 3. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over nine-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying PCD-3 zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings nine- RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 Page 2 stories tall be setback six times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 218 feet; therefore a 1,308-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 1,450 feet, therefore is code compliant. 4. These changes would not impact the recent Small Area Plans at 44th and France, Valley View and Wooddale or 70th and Cahill. 5. Higher density would seem reasonable in the Greater Southdale area given the proximity to arterial roadways, France Avenue. The floor area ratio (FAR) allowed in this area is 1.5. The prosed FAR for this project is 6.5. FAR is not necessarily a good indicator of residential density; rather a more appropriate measure is units per acre. If you compare a retail or medical office development at an FAR of 1.5 (81,000 square feet of development), the amount of traffic generated from that size of a development would be greater than the housing project proposed. 6. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed-use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 7. If the adjacent Promenade were included in the overall development calculation the overall density would be 86 units per acre. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment as follows, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: Table 4.3. Future Land Use Categories is amended as follows: MXC Mixed-Use Center Established or emerging mixed use districts serving areas larger than one neighborhood (and beyond city boundaries). Primary uses: Retail, office, service, multifamily residential, institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Maintain existing, or create new, pedestrian and streetscape amenities; encourage or require structured parking. Buildings “step down” in height from intersections. Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code: 100 units/acre The City Council may approve a project for up to 150 units per acre through a PUD rezoning in the Greater Southdale Area MXC, Mixed-Use Center. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, use of podium or liner buildings, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, enhancing the experience in the area where development is proposed underground parking, affordable housing, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 Page 3 Guidelines: Medium- and High-Density Design (All Uses) #10 Building Heights is amended as follows: 10. Building Heights. The question of building height is particularly significant in a largely developed community, where any new building has the potential to block views or cast shadows on established neighborhoods and land uses. The design guidelines above, as well as the recommended building heights in Figures 4.6A, 4.6B, and 4.6C, (Figures are shown on the following pages) provide general guidance for buildings that exceed the typical residential height of 2.5 stories. The City Council may consider individual projects that exceed the height recommendations in 4.6B and in the MXC, Mixed Use Center through a rezoning to PUD or Variance. Consideration for exceeding these height limits shall include but not be limited to: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Meeting and exceeding goals and policies outlined within the Comprehensive Plan Providing exceptional building quality, use of podium or liner buildings Sustainability measures within the development Pedestrian oriented development Providing significant publicly-accessible space, public realm and green space, enhancing the experience in the area where development is proposed Utilizing underground parking Providing affordable housing Proximity to low density uses Utility capacity; level of transit service available; and provisions to reduce negative impact on adjacent roads Meeting Variance and/or PUD Criteria RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-38 Page 7 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2018-39 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM PCD-3, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO PUD-14, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 14, INCLUDING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 3650 LLC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 3650 Hazelton, LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.25 acre parcel at 3650 Hazelton Road. As proposed, the existing Guitar Center would be torn down and a 19-story, 186 unit luxury apartments with underground parking would be constructed. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: See Attached Exhibit A. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following is required: A Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District-3 to PUD-14, Planned Unit Development 1.04 On March 28, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requests. Vote: 4 Ayes and 1 Nay. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass. They are designed to mix and blend with the existing buildings in the area. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks (existing small lot); Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along Hazelton, and would provide a future connection to the Promenade along the north lot line. Provides additional public space adjacent to the Promenade. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-39 Page 2 High quality buildings and design; Public art; Enhances the pedestrian experience along Hazelton Road and the Promenade. Affordable housing; 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-39 Page 3 6. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Creates a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area, and enhance the experience in the district. b. The building would be of high quality stone, brick, metal and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would contribute to the City’s Affordable Housing. Additionally, micro units would provide housing for a college graduate, young professional, young couple returning home and looking for a new home, corporate transfers interested in Edina, single empty nesters and retired persons. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District to PUD-14, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for the 3650 Hazelton Road Development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated February 16, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-39 Page 4 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. A cash-in-lieu of affordable housing in the amount of $1.86 million dollars shall be contributed to the City for affordable housing. Payment shall be received prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated March 21, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Spack Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-14, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding, height and density. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-39 Page 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on April 17, 2018. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION APRIL 17, 2018 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-7 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-14, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-14 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-14 (PUD-14) (a) Legal description: See attached Exhibit A (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on _________, 2018 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2018-___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-3 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD-3 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Required Building Setbacks Front – Hazelton Road Side - East Side – West Rear – North Podium Tower 50 feet 70 feet 10 feet 30 feet 20 feet 70 feet 10 feet 10 feet Building Height 19 stories and 225 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 7.0% Parking Stalls 298 stalls enclosed Parking Stall Size 8.5 x 18’ 2 Drive Aisle Width 24 feet (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PRD Zoning District. (h) All new development must conform to the city’s affordable housing policy as determined by the City Council. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: April 17, 2018 Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 1 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers March 28, 2018 C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment for Height and Density and Preliminary Rezoning for 3650 Hazelton Road, Edina, MN. Planner Presentation Planned Aaker informed the Commission he applicant, 3650 Hazelton, LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.25 acre parcel at 3650 Hazelton Road. As proposed, the existing Guitar Center would be torn down and a 19-story, 186-unit luxury apartment with underground parking would be constructed. Features of the development include: A Podium structure provided at ground level, with the units opening outward to access directly toward the Promenade. Enclosed and underground parking that is not visible from the Promenade or Hazelton Road. Public plaza and pedestrian connections to the Promenade and Hazelton Road. The applicant is proposing to meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy by providing a dedication of $1.86 million to provide affordable housing within the City. Additionally the applicant is proposing small 1-bedroom and Studio/Micro units. These smaller and very efficient units will provide a new housing option to the Edina marketplace. These micro units would generally range in size from 412 - 446 square feet and would be ideal for a college graduate, young professional, young couple returning home and looking for a new home, corporate transfers interested in Edina, single empty nesters and retired persons. Sustainability. LEED or Green Globe designation would be pursued. Amenity terrace including a pool. Aaker pointed out to accommodate the request the following is required: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the height maximum from 8 stories and 96 feet to 19 stores and 218 feet; and increase the density in the MXC, Mixed Use Center from 100 units per acre to 150 units per acre; and A Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District-3 to PUD-14, Planned Unit Development. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 2 Staff is further recommending that flexibility language be included in the Comprehensive Plan to allow the City the flexibility to approve projects that would exceed the Comprehensive Plan height requirements through rezoning or variance in the Greater Southdale Area and the MXC, Mixed Use Center. After June 30, 2018, the Metropolitan Council will no longer consider amendments to any 2008 Comprehensive Plan. That in effect, could put the City of Edina in a moratorium on development for a minimum of one year. Over the past 10 years in Edina, most re-development proposals in the Greater Southdale Area or in areas guided MXC, Mixed Use Center (50th & France and Grandview) have exceeded the Comprehensive Guide Plan designations for height, and have required a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. If the current 2018 Comprehensive Planning process remains on schedule (concluding in December of 2018), the earliest the Met Council would approve Edina’s Plan would be June of 2019. The Met Council requires a 6-month review process for themselves and adjacent cities. Aaker explained that in adopting this amendment, the City would not lose its regulatory controls in these areas as the City amended the Zoning Ordinance regarding height so that the Zoning Ordinance matched the Comprehensive Plan. Building height is typically a function of Zoning regulations and not a Comprehensive Plan. These changes would not impact the recent Small Area Plans at 44th and France, Valley View and Wooddale or 70th and Cahill. Aaker noted that the Southdale Area Working Principles were shared with the applicant. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson has provided a review of the proposed project; the review is based on the Greater Southdale Area Work Group principles. Aaker reminded the Commission that the applicant went through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council and based on feedback from the Planning Commission, the City Council, and the review from Mic Johnson, the applicant has: Revised the configuration of the sidewalk on Hazelton Road to be curved. Enhanced the landscaping on all side. Height has increased from 17 to 19 stories (8 feet). (This includes the rooftop mechanical equipment.) Unit increase from 170 to 186 units. Would meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Provided Public Art. Added a green roof. Modified the west façade. Aaker concluded that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the MXC, Mixed Use Center from 100 units per acre to 150 units per acre; and Flexibility language to be included in the Comprehensive Plan to allow the City Council the flexibility to approve projects that would exceed the Comprehensive Plan height Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 3 requirements in the Greater Southdale Area (Figure 4.6B) and the MXC, Mixed Use Center District through rezoning or variance. Approval is also subject to the following findings: 1. The City’s Zoning Ordinance was amended to reflect all heights recommended in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan; therefore, the City would not lose its regulatory control over height. 2. Building height is typically a function of Zoning regulations and not a Comprehensive Plan. 3. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over nine-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying PCD-3 zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings nine-stories tall be setback six times the height of the building from the property line of single-family homes. The building height is 218 feet; therefore, a 1,308-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 1,450 feet, therefore is code compliant. 4. These changes would not impact the recent Small Area Plans at 44th and France, Valley View and Wooddale or 70th and Cahill. 5. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed-use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 6. If the adjacent Promenade were included in the overall development calculation the overall density would be 86 units per acre. Continuing, Aaker recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District to PUD-14, Planned Unit Development District, including Preliminary Development Plan to construct the multi-family housing development at 3650 Hazelton Road. Approval is also subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass. They are designed to mix and blend with the existing buildings in the area. 2. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks (existing small lot); Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along Hazelton, and would provide a future connection to the Promenade along the north lot line. Provides additional public space adjacent to the Promenade. High quality buildings and design; Public art; Enhances the pedestrian experience along Hazelton Road and the Promenade. Affordable housing; Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 4 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary, the PUD zoning would: a. Creates a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area, and enhance the experience in the district. b. The building would be of high quality stone, brick, metal and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 5 d. Project would contribute to the City’s Affordable Housing. Additionally, micro units would provide housing for a college graduate, young professional, young couple returning home and looking for a new home, corporate transfers interested in Edina, single empty nesters and retired persons. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated February 16, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. A cash-in-lieu of affordable housing in the amount of $1.86 million dollars shall be contributed to the City for affordable housing. Payment shall be received prior to certificate of occupancy. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated March 21, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Spack Consulting Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-14, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding, height and density. Appearing for the Applicant Tom Lund, Lund Real Estate Partners, Gretchen Camp, and Trace Jacques, ESG Discussion/Comments/Questions Planner Aaker was asked how the City ensures that the affordable housing “fee” was met in lieu of providing the units. Aaker responded that a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued until the affordable housing fee was paid. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 6 Planner Aaker was asked if the City had “plans” for specific sites to provide affordable units and if so, now what happens? Aaker reported that at this time the HRA is looking into a number of options with how the affordable housing fee in lieu of housing is dispersed. Aaker said that providing funds to the City to establish affordable housing may provide the City with the flexibility to spread units throughout the City. Again, Aaker said the affordable housing options continue to be studied. . Applicant Presentation Mr. Lund informed the Commission that the development team responded to the suggestions made by both the Planning Commission and City Council at Sketch Plan Review and implemented a number of those suggestions. Lund said it was also their intent to meet all the principles established for the Greater Southdale Area. Lund introduced Gretchen Camp with ESG to present the project. Ms. Camp addressed the Commission and listed for them changes made to the proposal since Sketch Plan Review. Camp noted the following changes: • The sidewalk along Hazelton Road was curved; not straight as originally proposed. • Landscaping was enhanced on all sides of the building. • Height was increased by 8-feet to include the mechanical equipment. • Units have been increased from 170 to 186 units. • The project would meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. • Public Art was added. • A green roof was added. • The west façade of the building was modified and enhanced. • Parking proposed at 298 stalls. • Townhome units were increased to six from five. • Lighting was enhanced. • Exterior building materials were enhanced. • Screening of the mechanical equipment. Camp thanked the Commission and introduced Terry Minarik. Mr. Minarik further explained the changes to the proposal since Sketch Plan Review highlighting the enhancement of the public realm, the dog area and the introduction of permeable pavers, swale and other storm water management measures to enhance storm water management. Minarik also pointed out the following: • Created an enhanced “porch”. • The addition of an iconic sculpture. • Introduction of art pieces. • Frame spaces through landscaping and trees. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 7 • Space along the north property line is restricted; however, it would be enhanced with shrubs and lighting. • Front yard aesthetics is provided for the townhouse units. • Amenity Deck. • Mass Plantings. David Bade, Westwood explained to the Commission the proposed storm water management plan to include swale and surface infiltration. Bade said that currently the run-off is unmanaged and the property is almost 100% impervious. The proposed storm water management measures would meet City and Watershed requirements. Ms. Camp thanked the Commission for their time. Commissioners asked the following: • Has a decision been made on the LEED certification level. Camp reported they are exploring LEED (silver level) or Green Globes options. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners expressed the following: • The applicant was asked to explain the dog run area. Camp reported that this area should really be considered a “relief” area for the dogs. She said the surface of the area is specially treated to allow for thorough cleaning. It is believed that those with dogs would walk their dogs along the promenade or neighborhood. • An opinion was expressed that the building design and materials were not unique and a bit of a disappointment. Disappointment was also expressed with the north side of the site. Mr. Jacques with graphics highlighted the design of the building and exterior materials. Jacques further explained the parking and drop-off area in front of the lobby, landscaping and other amenities of the project. Jacques said the site is small and acknowledged the north side is narrow; however, they can revisit the landscaping and lighting in this area to further enhance it. Camp interjected noting that they followed the City’s position to break areas into small blocks, adding this building would be the first building on the “block”. • An opinion was expressed that the building looks great, great public areas and the south façade was done very well. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 8 • An opinion was expressed that the applicant in designing the building and site appears to have paid close attention to the Greater Southdale Area Principles. This project shows how people can live in an “urban” area but be close to nature. • Consider “beefing” up the educational piece, explain better. • An opinion was expressed that the front corner of the building was done well. It was suggested that more work needs to be done on engaging the public so they realize they can enjoy the outdoor amenities the site provides. Consider adding signage to the art pieces to interact with people. • It was acknowledged that the north side of the site was tight; however, ensure that residents feel safe walking in this area. Make sure that the lighting and landscaping along the north-building wall was adequate. Consider a green wall on that side. • The applicant was asked if there were no building restraints placed on this site what would be built. Lund responded that they would probably go taller; however, it was found that providing the underground parking was paramount to a successful site. The water table and soil conditions really dictate building placement and height. Lund also noted that their intent was to build no taller than the Westin. • Disappointment was expressed that the building would not provide affordable housing units within and that the applicant would pay a fee instead of providing those units. Lund informed the Commission the development team met with City staff and elected officials adding all were aware of the intent to pay the fee. He pointed out paying a fee is part of Edina’s Affordable Housing Policy. Lund explained that a number of units would be micro-units; offered at more affordable prices. • Compliments were paid to the applicant on the storm water management measures. • The applicant was asked where the bike parking was located. Jacques with graphics pointed out the underground bike parking facilities. It was suggested that more outdoor bike stalls be added. Jacques agreed • It was suggested that the applicants provide as part of their sustainable measures information on bus routes and times. Camp acknowledged that was a good suggestion, adding placing that information in the lobby area was a good idea. • The applicant was asked the range in rent prices. Lund responded that he believes the micro- units would be priced at $1,000. Other units would range in price above that upwards to $10,000 per month for the penthouses. • An opinion was expressed that the proposal appears too dense. Is the City intent on redeveloping areas of Edina to mirror downtown Minneapolis? It was pointed out that the greater Southdale area was larger than downtown Minneapolis. The Southdale area is the correct area for density. • It was noted that mass transit works best with density and if one of Edina’s goal was to reduce the demand for the automobile, density makes sense. • It was suggested to Staff that it would be helpful if the Greater Southdale Work Group established guidelines to follow within this area and others. Aaker agreed. A lengthy discussion ensued on Edina’s Affordable Housing Policy and the disappointment that in an area where affordable housing units would be of benefit to workers none are offered. The discussion continued on financial aspects of the projects and the density. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 9 Commissioner Lee asked Planner Aaker if under the recommendation for Comprehensive Plan Amendment approval would the two bulleted conditions need to be included in that motion. Planner Aaker responded that both are required for the project to proceed. Lee noted that she had reservations with the flexibility language within the MXC (Mixed Use Center District) zoning, adding in her opinion splitting those bullets would be appropriate. Lee further suggested that separate motions be made for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Motion Commissioner Hamilton moved to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to include: • A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the MXC, Mixed Use Center from 100-units per acre to 150-units per acre; and • Flexibility language to be included in the Comprehensive Plan to allow the City Council the flexibility to approve projects that would exceed the Comprehensive Plan height requirements in the Greater Southdale Area and the MXC, Mixed Use Center district through rezoning or variance. Approval is also subject to staff findings. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Commissioner Miranda commented that he agrees that building height should not be in the Comprehensive Plan; however, the Mixed Use Center also includes 50th & France and Grandview Neighborhood Nodes. Grandview will consider a redevelopment to include building height, adding he is not certain if tower height is appropriate in the 50th & France Neighborhood Node. Aaker agreed and pointed out that zoning requirements remain and a tower would not be permitted in any MXC zone unless approved. Commissioner Lee said in her opinion the flexibility language was added because of the time constraints established by the Met Council in allowing amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Lee stated that she objects to that language. She said eliminating the flexibility language does not mean that a moratorium was placed on all developments - development needs to match zoning requirements. If approved as written the flexibility language would allow construction of a high-rise tower without going through the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. Lee reiterated that the bullet points should be voted on separately. Commissioner Bennet asked the Commission if they believe anything was missing from the proposed language. Commissioners expressed that they were comfortable with the proposed language. Commissioners did not separate the bullet points. Ayes; Miranda, Strauss, Hamilton, Bennett and Olsen. Nays; Lee. Motion carried 4-1 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. 10 Commissioner Strauss moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, and Preliminary Development Plan approval as outlined in the staff report based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions beginning on page 21. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. Commissioner Lee said she could not support the rezoning request to PUD because affordable housing units were not included. If affordable units were included, she could support the rezoning. Ayes; Miranda, Strauss, Hamilton, Bennett, Olsen. Nay; Lee. Motion carried 4-1. I. Adjournment Commissioner Miranda moved meeting adjournment at 10:40 P.M. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. All voted aye. Meeting adjourned. Jackie Jackie Jackie Jackie HoogenakkerHoogenakkerHoogenakkerHoogenakker Respectfully submitted 3650 Hazelton Road Comp Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Final Development Plan EdinaMN.gov 2 EdinaMN.gov 3 EdinaMN.gov 4 EdinaMN.gov 5 EdinaMN.gov 6 EdinaMN.gov 7 EdinaMN.gov 8 Sketch Plan EdinaMN.gov 9 Sketch Plan Revisions from Sketch Plan: EdinaMN.gov 10 EdinaMN.gov 11 Proposal EdinaMN.gov 12 EdinaMN.gov 13 EdinaMN.gov 14 Request Requires: www.EdinaMN.gov 15 A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the height maximum from 8 stories and 96 feet to 19 stores and 218 feet; and increase the density in the MXC, Mixed Use Center in the Greater Southdale Area from 100 units per acre to 150 units per acre; A Rezoning from PCD-3, Planned Commercial District-3 to PUD-14, Planned Unit Development; and Staff is further recommending that flexibility language be included in the Comprehensive Plan to allow the City the flexibility to approve projects that would exceed the Comprehensive Plan height requirements through rezoning or variance in the Greater Southdale Area and the MXC, Mixed Use Center. After June 30, 2018, the Metropolitan Council will no longer consider amendments to any 2008 Comprehensive Plan. That in effect, could put the City of Edina in a moratorium on development for a minimum of one year. Over the past 10 years in Edina, most re-development proposals in the Greater Southdale Area or in areas guided MXC, Mixed Use Center (50th & France and Grandview) have exceeded the Comprehensive Guide Plan designations for height, and have required a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. If the current 2018 Comprehensive Planning process remains on schedule (concluding in December of 2018), the earliest the Met Council would approve Edina’s Plan would be June of 2019. The Met Council requires a 6-month review process for themselves and adjacent cities. Review of the Site Plan EdinaMN.gov 16 EdinaMN.gov 17 EdinaMN.gov 18 EdinaMN.gov 19 Primary Issues Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding height reasonable for this site, the Greater Southdale Area and the MXC, District? Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density reasonable for this site? Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site? EdinaMN.gov 20 Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Height After June 30, 2018, the Metropolitan Council will no longer consider amendments to any 2008 Comprehensive Plan. That in effect, could put the City of Edina in a moratorium on development for a minimum of one year. Over the past 10 years in Edina, most re-development proposals in the Greater Southdale Area or in areas guided MXC, Mixed Use Center (50th & France and Grandview) have exceeded the Comprehensive Guide Plan designations for height, and have required a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. If the current 2018 Comprehensive Planning process remains on schedule (concluding in December of 2018), the earliest the Met Council would approve Edina’s Plan would be June of 2019. The Met Council requires a 6-month review process for themselves and adjacent cities. Building height is typically a function of Zoning and not a Comprehensive Plan requirement. In adopting this amendment for height, the City would not lose its regulatory controls in these areas as the City amended the Zoning Ordinance regarding height so that the Zoning Ordinance matches the Comprehensive Plan. EdinaMN.gov 21 EdinaMN.gov 22 Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Height These changes would not impact the recent Small Area Plans at 44th and France, Valley View and Wooddale or 70th and Cahill. EdinaMN.gov 23 EdinaMN.gov 24 EdinaMN.gov 25 Comprehensive Plan Amendment -Density If the adjacent Promenade were included in the overall development calculation the overall density would be 86 units per acre. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. EdinaMN.gov 26 EdinaMN.gov 27 PUD Justification 1.Addresses Development Principles 2.Meets the PUD Criteria -creates a pedestrian friendly development with connections to the Promenade; buildings would be of high quality architecture; meets affordable housing policy; provision of micro units; eliminates surface parking; and enhance landscaping. 3.Roadways would support the project EdinaMN.gov 28 Division of the property into smaller blocks (existing small lot); Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along Hazelton, and would provide a future connection to the Promenade along the north lot line. Provides additional public space adjacent to the Promenade. High quality buildings and design; Public art; Enhances the pedestrian experience along Hazelton Road and the Promenade. Affordable housing; Recommendation EdinaMN.gov 29 EdinaMN.gov 30 EdinaMN.gov 31 City Range – Per Acre Bloomington High Density Residential No limit Commercial (Community & Regional) 0-83 High Intense mix use 0-60 Airport South mix use 30-131 Richfield High Density Residential Minimum of 24 Mixed Use 50+ St. Louis Park High Density Residential 20-75 (PUD for high end) Mixed Use 20-75 (PUD for high end) Commercial 20-50 Minnetonka High Density Residential 12+ Mixed Use No range established (density based on site location and site conditions.) Minneapolis High Density (mixed use) 50-120 Very High Density(mixed use) 120+ EdinaMN.gov 32 EdinaMN.gov 33 EdinaMN.gov 34 EdinaMN.gov 35 EdinaMN.gov 36 EdinaMN.gov 37 EdinaMN.gov 38 EdinaMN.gov 39 EdinaMN.gov 40 EdinaMN.gov 41 EdinaMN.gov 42 EdinaMN.gov 43 EdinaMN.gov 44 EdinaMN.gov 45 EdinaMN.gov 46 EdinaMN.gov 47 ED I N A P R O M E N A D E R E S I D E N C E S RE D E V E L O P M E N T & L A N D M A R K V I S I O N Ed i n a , M N CI T Y C O U N C I L M E E T I N G Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S L L C | 2 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S ExisƟ ng Site CondiƟ ons | 3 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Context Map F R A N C E A V E S HA Z E L T O N R D Y O R K A V E S H A Z E L T O N R D TA R G E T LU N D S & BY E R L Y S GA L E R I A E D I N A SO U T H D A L E LI B R A R Y W 7 0 T H S T YO R K T O W N S H O P S RU E d e F R A N C E SH O P S US BA N K P R O M E N A D E 36 5 0 | 4 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Project Vision W E A R E C R E A T I N G T H E F I R S T B U I L D I N G B L O C K Έ& C O R N E R S T O N E Ή O F Y O U R N E W D I S T R I C T V I S I O N F O R E D I N A | 5 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S • S M A L L F O O T P R I N T , H I G H E R D E N S I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T ( P E R F E C T L O C A T I O N F O R T H I S H E I G H T ) . • T A L L E R M A S S I N G O F T H E B U I L D I N G I S S E T B A C K F R O M B A S E P O D I U M . • H I G H L Y A C T I V E P E D E S T R I A N F R I E N D L Y B U I L D I N G B A S E D E S I G N . • S U S T A I N A B L E & E N V I R O N M E N T A L L Y R E S P O N S I V E D E S I G N . • F O C U S O N C O N N E C T I V I T Y . • Q U A L I T Y A R C H I T E C T U R E . • Q U A L I T Y B U I L D I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N . • A R C H I T E C T U R A L L Y S C R E E N E D P A R K I N G . Project Vision W E A R E C R E A T I N G T H E F I R S T B U I L D I N G B L O C K Έ& C O R N E R S T O N E Ή O F Y O U R N E W D I S T R I C T V I S I O N F O R E D I N A TH E S O U T H D A L E A R E A F R A M E W O R K D E S I G N P R I N C I P A L S SH A P I N G O U R D E S I G N : | 6 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S • S M A L L F O O T P R I N T , H I G H E R D E N S I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T ( P E R F E C T L O C A T I O N F O R T H I S H E I G H T ) . • T A L L E R M A S S I N G O F T H E B U I L D I N G I S S E T B A C K F R O M B A S E P O D I U M . • H I G H L Y A C T I V E P E D E S T R I A N F R I E N D L Y B U I L D I N G B A S E D E S I G N . • S U S T A I N A B L E & E N V I R O N M E N T A L L Y R E S P O N S I V E D E S I G N . • F O C U S O N C O N N E C T I V I T Y . • Q U A L I T Y A R C H I T E C T U R E . • Q U A L I T Y B U I L D I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N . • A R C H I T E C T U R A L L Y S C R E E N E D P A R K I N G . Project Vision W E A R E C R E A T I N G T H E F I R S T B U I L D I N G B L O C K Έ& C O R N E R S T O N E Ή O F Y O U R N E W D I S T R I C T V I S I O N F O R E D I N A O U R G O A L I S T O S E T A N E W D E S I G N Q U A L I T Y B A R F O R T H E F U T U R E . . . TH E S O U T H D A L E A R E A F R A M E W O R K D E S I G N P R I N C I P A L S SH A P I N G O U R D E S I G N : | 7 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Project Updates PR O J E C T U P D A T E S ͳ B U I L D I N G A R C H I T E C T U R E BA S E D O N P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N / C I T Y C O U N C I L F E E D B A C K & S I T E D U E D IL I G E N C E • O n e l e v e l a d d e d t o t h e p a r k i n g p o d i u m - t o a c c o m m o d a t e g u e s t pa r k i n g a n d h i g h w a t e r t a b l e . P r e v i o u s p l a n ha d 2 5 5 s t a l l s a n d c u r r e n t p l a n h a s 2 9 8 s t a l l s . • C l u b r o o m a n d o u t d o o r r o o f t o p a m e n i t y t e r r a c e h a v e b e e n a d d e d o n t h e n o r t h e n d • O n e a d d i Ɵ o n a l t o w n h o m e a d d e d - c r e a Ɵ n g m o r e a c Ɵ v i t y a l o n g t h e P r o m e n a d e • S u b t l e e x t e r i o r u p - l i g h Ɵ n g h a s b e e n a d d e d t o e m p h a s i z e a n d a c c e n t u a t e t h e b u i l d i n g t o p a n d a r r i v a l a r e a s • E a s t f a ç a d e i n c o r p o r a t e s m o r e g l a s s a n d l e s s b r i c k t o e n s u r e hi g h v i s i b i l i t y o f t h e i n t e r n a l l o b b y s p a c e • A r c h i t e c t u r a l d e t a i l a d d e d t o n o r t h a n d w e s t f a ç a d e s - c o m b i n in g b r i c k a n d m e t a l p a n e l s t o v a r y t h e e x p r e s s i o n • H i g h - q u a l i t y m a t e r i a l s h a v e b e e n f u r t h e r r e f i n e d : b r i c k , p r e - c a s t , m e t a l p a n e l , g l a s s a n d w o o d a c c e n t s • M e c h a n i c a l e q u i p m e n t o n t h e r o o f i s s c r e e n e d b y e x t e n d i n g t h e a r c h i t e c t u r a l f a ç a d e ( p a r a p e t ) • S u s t a i n a b l e d e s i g n s t r a t e g i e s w i l l b e i n c o r p o r a t e d | 8 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S • R e d e f i n e d c o r n e r f e a t u r e a t t h e P r o m e n a d e - b y a d d i n g p l a n Ɵ n g s t h a t d e f i n e p o r c h a n d t h e p u b l i c w a l k • P u b l i c a r t a n d s e a Ɵ n g a t t h e S E c o r n e r c r e a t e i n t e r e s t a n d p u b l i c i n t e r a c Ɵ o n • E n h a n c e d l a n d s c a p e a n d p e d e s t r i a n m o v e m e n t a l o n g H a z e l t o n R o a d - m e a n d e r i n g p a t h a n d p l a n Ɵ ngs • P r o m e n a d e d e s i g n - e n h a n c e d l a n d s c a p e d e s i g n s e t a s a r o o m w i th i n a b o s q u e o f A s p e n • D o g p l a y a r e a - d e f i n e d w i t h p l a n Ɵ n g s o n w e s t e r n b u i l d i n g e d g e a n d t a k i n g a d v a n t a g e o f t h e a Ō ernoon sun • S e r v i c e / L o a d i n g a r e a c a r e f u l l y s c r e e n e d b y l a n d s c a p e p l a n Ɵ n g s • P e r m e a b l e p a v e r s w i l l b e a d d e d t o t h e a u t o c o u r t s u r f a c e • A d d i Ɵ o n a l s t o r m w a t e r f e a t u r e s h a v e b e e n a d d e d , i n c l u d i n g g r e e n i n f r as t r u c t u r e • E n h a n c e d s t o r m w a t e r m a n a g e m e n t i m p r o v e m e n t s w i l l b e i m p l e m e n t ed t o m e e t C i t y & W a t e r s h e d r e q u i r e m e n t s Project Updates PR O J E C T U P D A T E S ͳ S I T E BA S E D O N P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N / C I T Y C O U N C I L F E E D B A C K & S I T E D U E D IL I G E N C E | 9 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S ( P r o m e n a d e ) Au t o Co u r t Pu b l i c Ar t Am e n i t y W a l k - U p U n i t s (T o w e r ) To w e r ( Y e l l o w ) Pl i n t h ( R e d ) Se r v i c e Po r c h (T e r r a c e ) (T e r r a c e ) (T e r r a c e ) (T e r r a c e ) B i k e P a t h W a l k i n g P a t h Site Plan N HA Z E L T O N R O A D (TARGET) (1 - S T O R Y CO M M E R C I A L ) (R O U N D A B O U T ) (1 - S T O R Y C O M M E R C I A L ) | 10 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Street Level PlanN D Ž ǀ Ğ / Ŷ d ƌ Ă Ɛ Ś DĂ ŝ ů KĨĨ ŝ Đ Ğ WĂ Đ Ŭ Ă Ő Ğ Ɛ t hƉ Ž ǁ Ŷ ŝ Ŭ Ğ ^ƚ Ž ƌ Ă Ő Ğ нϲ Ζ Ͳ ϰ Ζ ϲ Η Ž Ő ZƵ Ŷ hƉ WĂ Đ Ŭ Ă Ő Ğ >Ž Đ Ŭ Ğ ƌ Ɛ &ŝƌ Ğ Ž ŵ ŵ Ă Ŷ Ě (P o r c h ) To w n h o m e Un i t Pa r k i n g G a r a g e To w n h o m e Un i t To w n h o m e Un i t To w n h o m e Un i t To w n h o m e Un i t To w n h o m e Un i t Lo b b y S e r v i c e / L o a d i n g | 11 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Building Rendering - Looking Northeast | 12 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Context View - Looking North Along The Promenade | 13 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Building Rendering - Looking Northwest | 14 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S View Of Promenade - Showing Public Art Amenity & Landscape | 15 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Public Lawn At Promenade - With View of Building Lobby | 16 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Townhome Walk-Up Stoops Along Promenade - Looking South | 17 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S View Of Street-Level Porch | 18 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S PerspecƟ ve View of Auto Court | 19 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Entry Lobby | 20 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S View Of Amenity Deck, Looking South | 21 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S View Of North and West ElevaƟ ons | 22 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Context View - Looking Northeast | 23 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Landscape Plan | 24 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Visioning Images - Streetscape and Public Realm Design | 25 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Visioning Images - Outdoor Courtyards | 26 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Visioning Images - Promenade Landscape | 27 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S PerspecƟ ve Views - Landscape Design | 28 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Stormwater Management • C u r r e n t s i t e s t o r m w a t e r i s u n t r e a t e d w i t h a s i g n i f i c a n t p o r Ɵ o n r u n n i n g o f f f r o m t h e p a r k i n g l o t s u r f a c e . • R e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e s i t e i m p r o v e s s t o r m w a t e r m a n a g e m e n t t h r o ug h t h e a d d i Ɵ o n o f g r e e n s p a c e , a n i n f i ltraƟ on ra i n g a r d e n , a s u b s u r f a c e i n f i l t r a Ɵ o n s y s t e m , a n d s i g n i f i c a n t l y r e d u c e d p a r k i n g a r e a . • P e r m e a b l e p a v e r s a r e p l a n n e d f o r t h e a u t o c o u r t a r e a - p r o m o t es h a r d s c a p e p o i n t s o u r c e i n f i ltraƟ on. • I n f i l t r a Ɵ o n b a s i n o n t h e P r o m e n a d e w i l l c o l l e c t c l e a n r o o f r u n - o f f a n d w i l l s u p p o r t t h e l a n d s c a p e i m p r o v e m e n t s . • T h e s u b s u r f a c e i n f i l t r a Ɵ o n s y s t e m c o l l e c t s r u n o f f f r o m t h e m a i n t o w e r a n d d e c k a n d i s s i z e d m o r e t h a n 5 0 % l a r ger th a n t h e b a s e l i n e r e q u i r e d b y t h e W a t e r s h e d . • A d d i Ɵ o n a l l a n d s c a p e / l a w n a r e a s o n t h e r o o f a r e p l a n n e d a n d w i l l a d d t o t h e o v e r a l l e n h a n c e m e n t s . • T h e s e i m p r o v e m e n t s w i l l p o s i Ɵ o n t h e p r o j e c t t o b e p a r t o f t h e W a t e r s h e d S t o r m w a t e r V o l u m e C redit Program. ST O R M W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T | 29 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Stormwater Management E EE HH ST ST E E SS T CO N N E C T T O EX I S T I N G S T M S W R ST M H - 1 0 1 (V E R I F Y I N V E R T ) ST M H 2 0 2 RE = 8 7 1 . 0 0 IE = 8 6 8 . 6 2 SU M P = 8 6 5 . 5 0 33 L F T R E N C H DR A I N 6 L F 1 2 " S T M @ 4 7 . 8 % 5 L F S T M @ 1 . 0 0 % IE = 8 6 5 . 7 5 ST M H 2 0 1 RE = 8 7 2 . 4 0 IE ( N ) = 8 6 6 . 9 0 IE ( W ) = 8 6 5 . 2 5 IE ( S ) = 8 6 5 . 7 5 4 5 L F 1 5 " S T M @ 1 . 0 0 % 2 2 L F 1 2 " S T M @ 5 . 0 % RD I E = 8 6 8 . 0 0 UN D E R G R O U N D I N F I L T R A T I O N S Y S T E M 24 0 L F P E R F 6 0 " C M P IN F V O L . R E Q . = 3 2 0 0 C F IN F . V O L . P R O V I D E D B E L O W O U T L E T = 5 6 0 0 C F 22 L F 1 2 " S T M @ 2 . 0 % OC S - 1 0 2 RE = 8 7 0 . 8 0 IE = 8 6 6 . 8 0 RD IE = 8 7 1 . 0 0 OU T L E T IE = 8 7 0 . 8 0 20 L F 8 " S T M @ 1 . 0 % | 30 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S ( P r o m e n a d e ) Au t o Co u r t Pu b l i c Ar t Am e n i t y W a l k - U p U n i t s (T o w e r ) To w e r ( Y e l l o w ) Pl i n t h ( R e d ) Se r v i c e Po r c h (T e r r a c e ) (T e r r a c e ) (T e r r a c e ) (T e r r a c e ) B i k e P a t h W a l k i n g P a t h Site Plan N HA Z E L T O N R O A D (TARGET) (1 - S T O R Y CO M M E R C I A L ) (R O U N D A B O U T ) (1 - S T O R Y C O M M E R C I A L ) | 31 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Building Rendering - Looking Northeast | 33 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S DĂ ŝ Ŷ ƚ Ğ Ŷ Ă Ŷ Đ Ğ ^Ś Ž Ɖ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ P2 - Parking Plan | 34 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ P1 - Parking Plan | 35 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S D Ž ǀ Ğ / Ŷ d ƌ Ă Ɛ Ś DĂ ŝ ů KĨĨ ŝ Đ Ğ WĂ Đ Ŭ Ă Ő Ğ Ɛ t hƉ Ž ǁ Ŷ ŝ Ŭ Ğ ^ƚ Ž ƌ Ă Ő Ğ Ž Ő ZƵ Ŷ hƉ WĂ Đ Ŭ Ă Ő Ğ >Ž Đ Ŭ Ğ ƌ Ɛ &ŝƌ Ğ Ž ŵ ŵ Ă Ŷ Ě W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ Street Level Plan | 36 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S 7UD V K hƉ Ž ǁ Ŷ Ͳϱ Ζ ϭϮ Ζ KƉ Ğ Ŷ ƚ Ž > Ž ď ď LJ Ğ ů Ž ǁ нϲ нϭ ϳ ϭϮ Ζ Ž Ŷ Ĩ Ğ ƌ Ğ Ŷ Đ Ğ ϭϳ Ζ dž Ϯ Ϭ Ζ tŽ ƌ Ŭ ^ Ɖ Ă Đ Ğ ϭϴ Ζ dž ϭ ϱ Ζ KĨĨ ŝ Đ Ğ ϭϴ Ζ dž ϭ Ϯ Ζ Ž ǁ Ŷ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ Level 2 Plan | 37 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S 7UD V K Ž ǁ Ŷ Ͳϱ Ζ hƉ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ Level 3 Plan | 38 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S 7UD V K Ž ǁ Ŷ Ͳϱ Ζ KƉ Ğ Ŷ ƚŽ Ğ ů Ž ǁ KƵ ƚ ů ŝ Ŷ Ğ Ž Ĩ WŽ Ž ů ď Ž ǀ Ğ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ Level 4 Plan | 39 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S dƌĂ Ɛ Ś ů Ğ Đ &ŝƚ Ŷ Ğ Ɛ Ɛ >Ă ǁ Ŷ WŽ Ž ů W ƌ ŝ ǀ Ă ƚ Ğ d Ğ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ W ƌ ŝ ǀ Ă ƚ Ğ d Ğ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ W ƌ ŝ ǀ Ă ƚ Ğ d Ğ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ W ƌ ŝ ǀ Ă ƚ Ğ d Ğ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ W ƌ ŝ ǀ Ă ƚ Ğ d Ğ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ W ƌ ŝ ǀ Ă ƚ Ğ d Ğ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ ^Ă Ƶ Ŷ Ă &ŝƚ Ŷ Ğ Ɛ Ɛ Ž Ŷ Ğ ŵ Ă Ŷ Ě ͬz Ž Ő Ă ϰϴ Ϭ Ɛ Ĩ DĞ Ŷ tŽ ŵ Ğ Ŷ &ŝƚ Ŷ Ğ Ɛ Ɛ ϭ͕ ϭ ϱ Ϭ Ɛ Ĩ ^ƚĂ ŝ ƌ dž ŝ ƚ Wƌ ŝ ǀ Ă ƚ Ğ ŝŶ ŝ Ŷ Ő ůƵ ď ZŽ Ž ŵ W ƌ ŝ ǀ Ă ƚ Ğ d Ğ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ 'Ƶ Ğ Ɛ ƚ 'Ƶ Ğ Ɛ ƚ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ Level 5 Plan Su n d e c k Ou t d o o r K i t c h e n Yo g a / S p i n P l a ƞ o r m Pr i v a t e Ca b a n a s Fir e p i t s | 40 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S d ƌ Ă Ɛ Ś ů Ğ Đ ŵ Ğ Ŷ ŝ ƚ LJ dĞ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ Ăƚ > Ğ ǀ Ğ ů ϱ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ Levels 6-15 Plan | 41 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S dƌ Ă Ɛ Ś ů Ğ Đ ϭϬ Ζ dž ϵ Ζ ϴΖ dž ϭ Ϯ Ζ ϴΖ dž ϭ Ϭ Ζ ϴΖ dž ϭ Ϭ Ζ ϴΖ dž ϭ Ϭ Ζ ϴΖ dž ϭ Ϭ Ζ ϴΖ dž ϭ Ϭ Ζ ϭϬ Ζ dž ϳ Ζ ϭϬ Ζ dž ϵ Ζ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ Levels 16-17 Plan | 42 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S dƌ Ă Ɛ Ś ů Ğ Đ ϭϲ Ζ dž Ϯ Ϭ Ζ ϭϴ Ζ dž Ϯ ϰ Ζ ϭ Ϭ Ζ dž Ϯ ϰ Ζ ϭϴ Ζ dž ϭ ϱ Ζ Ϯϯ Ζ dž ϭ ϭ Ζ ϮϬ Ζ Ͳ ϭ Ϭ Η dž ϭ ϭ Ζ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ Level 18 Plan | 43 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S KƉ Ğ Ŷ ƚ Ž ǁ Ğ ů ů ŝ Ŷ Ő Ğ ů Ž ǁ dĞ ƌ ƌ Ă Đ Ğ W>EEKZd,^ĐĂůĞ͗ϭΗсϯϬΖͲϬΗ Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ RooŌ op Club Room and Private Dining Sk y L o u n g e | 44 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Ɖ ƌ ŝ ů ϭ Ϯ ͕ Ϯ Ϭ ϭ ϴ P2 - Parking Plan | 45 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Service/Loading -Turning Movements E EE ST ST ST E E SS E EE ST ST ST E E SS T | 46 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Service/Loading -Turning Movements E EE ST ST ST E E SS E EE ST ST ST E E SS T | 47 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S Service/Loading -Turning Movements E EE ST ST ST E E SS E EE ST ST ST E E SS T | 48 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S JU N E 2 1 - M O R N I N G - 9 A M JU N E 2 1 - N O O N MA R / S E P T 2 1 - M O R N I N G - 9 A M JU N E 2 1 - E V E N I N G - 3 P M MA R / S E P T 2 1 - E V E N I N G - 3 P M MA R / S E P T 2 1 - N O O N DE C 2 1 - M O R N I N G - 9 A M DE C 2 1 - N O O N DE C 2 1 - E V E N I N G - 3 P M Shadow Study | 49 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S View of Building Roof | 50 36 5 0 H A Z L E T O N R D . - E D I N A Ap r i l 1 7 , 2 0 1 8 L U N D R E A L E S T A T E P A R T N E R S West Podium ElevaƟ on Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-32: Supporting the 2021 TH169 Noise Wall Improvements by MnDOT Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution. INTRODUCTION: As part of MnDOT's noise abatement program, two locations in Edina are ranked near the top of the list for implementation in the near future along Highway 169. Staff from both agencies will present information for the council to consider a Resolution of Support for the projects. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-32 Feb. 26 Resident Meeting Presentation Info Meeting Sign In Sheet and Comment Cards Resident Emails of Support Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2018-32 SUPPORTING THE 2021 NOISE WALL IMPROVEMENTS BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) conducted a noise abatement study, as required by legislation passed by congress in 1972, finding noise standards had been exceeded in areas along Minnesota freeways and expressways; and, WHEREAS, MnDOT ranked the need for noise walls based on existing noise levels, length of barrier and number of homes. The study put the following locations on the list to be constructed in 2021: • TH-169 NB Waterford Court to 5901 Lincoln Drive • TH-169 NB Valley View Road to Apache Road WHEREAS, noise studies, conducted by MnDOT along the above locations found the traffic noise approaches or exceeds the Federal Highway Criteria of 67dB(A)(LEG) and the Minnesota State daytime noise standard of 65 dB(A) (L10); and, WHEREAS, a noise wall would block the direct path of sound waves from the highway to homes and businesses along the highway reducing traffic noise by at least 3dB(A); and, WHEREAS, the project would include the construction of approximately a 20 foot high, concrete or wood, wall; and, WHEREAS, the project will be funded 90% by MnDOT and 10% by the City of Edina. WHEREAS, the City of Edina funds the 10% cost share requirement using special assessments to benefitting properties; and, WHEREAS, the City of Edina will conduct a public improvement hearing at a future date closer to time of construction to allow public comments on potential property assessments; and, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina supports MnDOT’s continued analysis and design in anticipation of the construction of two new noise walls to reduce noise levels. Adopted this 17th day of April, 2018. ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________ City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk Highway 169 Informational Meeting February 26, 2018 Agenda www.EdinaMN.gov 2 • • • • • • • Location Maps www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Project Details •20-ft high Wood or Concrete Wall (estimate based on wood) •Located within Highway 169 Right-of-Way •Design and Administration by MnDOT www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Project Details Do Taxes Cover Wall Projects? •Roughly 20 percent of your property taxes go to the City for expenses such as Police, Fire, Parks and Public Works (snowplowing, pothole repairs, sealcoating, and other street maintenance). •Your taxes do not pay for wall construction. www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Funding •MnDOT’s Noise Wall Policy •10% Local is funded by special assessments •Special assessments are assigned to adjacent properties that stand to benefit from construction improvements. www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Funding / Costs •Decibel Reduction = Benefit = Assessment * includes inflation and contingency * www.EdinaMN.gov 7 North Wall Total Est. Cost Est.Assessments Wood $682,000 $300-$500 per REU Concrete $1,370,000 $540-$940 per REU South Wall Total Est. Cost Est.Assessments Wood $1,600,000 $1,000-$3,000 per REU Concrete $2,260,000 $2,000-$5,500 per REU Schedule •Feb. 2018 Informational Meeting •March / April 2018 Council Resolution of Support •2020 / 2021 Public Hearing with Council •2021 / 2022 Construction •2022 / 2023 Assessment Hearing www.EdinaMN.gov 8 Payment Options •Timing for the assessment 2022 or 2023 •Assessments are payable over 15 years •Payment options: www.EdinaMN.gov 9 What You Can Expect •We will keep you informed of the project and its progress. •You will have opportunities to provide input. •We will do our best to minimize inconveniences, but construction does not come without pain points. •Dust, noise, vibrations. www.EdinaMN.gov 10 What You Can Expect •You will be notified of all meetings, hearings, and schedules via regular mail. •Public hearing notices are also published in Edina Sun- Current. •Final assessment notices are mailed. www.EdinaMN.gov 11 Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 12 TH169 NOISE WALLS INFORMATIONAL MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 4_ o vc A,- ,, ,/,,,o,, ) (,60, ikt ) L, 4,,e, . 2 e rr 6 / 0-5- c A...1..e., ....__Zd—, 3 1, I ' '' ' 0 - A, 4 (_ ‘.,67 a_-c.--6 .-%- -c.._ (-/ 41-,4,-T,t 1 5 A F.543- 7-2 .1._ € c c9,0t-- (- u -7 i 9 L-)-:-, ksz___ V) 7 0 e_ 6 bt t fa Aey L 7 cl '3 A. ok it 9 0 y c/ 0 r • 8 a\e.v.e Iti,-)0_, .e.--e-)Li & ct91 1 A,_,5,i0o( e--(-- 9 ,„(-7 _e ' g2n,t3----0-0--,--L„---1 Co q 9 S-. (-efr)--/ (,r_2 e9_ c 10 --7 . c€,L,L ct., go-..tLe., (,?(-{c / /ce-1_, 4'/ 4- 11 67L_L..--ht&i 4/4 Lt-44r-r-c- (7,2,( tjc:-r a_A IL- 12 12 1 CA-6- \ t_t_c_ A...., co?; -7 Ii (),,,,J,,,e_ Z8 13 /lAi*CAC4A Mciii 672..r_L.vheset eior- . 14 '//, .e1,9-7 ,A._ /d 15 e,:0,--Lr-/r)--i-D . - 0-y D -:k1 te.5-772 6--( -e_cts -i--) e+ 16 6 (a,„\ k -ra,,y--q Ma-i-LACk.(x- yk- 6 ( 0 c, Lk),d-d-ri'acciit CI-. 17 Tri-7: by yd., c.)((-- ((' 7/ 6, t1/,_C -/— /rte ( I 18 M A.,ov.),a, 4 9 (ov ---/J- t,c 0 )//\ br. 19 irtiii-7 /----Z 7 .---9€1-ffrk-0 7 2-/ v.f).e7,1- 7/---4, 20 C (A -e Kr4_ 6 I e (2____ & f i c 1--qs- 6i,-a(.. KY)-,____ 21 Va,k\i •A, clA 10 751 fk-fAK--VvL. 0-- - 22 (1 1,2.,:^ T---,11-f- a0 Dr) (1.,,,iv. ,‘ S. 23 7, ;) I I A &-71 ki.0 7:Y6.1 ,,-- j. 24 r_,.), --77/XYZ C-,' / ," 7k- .,/,( /ey T;27 Z; 25 rzi.,_e_s)aLti 0,9'/ La.1-1 71-,-,— 26 1 r T 'S) 17c111:DC) li-'f--iy E.) __(----}„,-.C, --Af---)A 27 6/272 c-7272 - , i---/-t-- L7q 4 ,,a--71.1 co / I 29 30 Please share your comments below: Pk-k -exrci, 1 1 _ ikfel1/4--a7les , Email: i4rs-rp, 2 c_-) cis-p-r1C4cf-, WO' Optional: Name: CCW..11J-71•7 ,1-/LIT.,, Please share your comments below: ..A.,.. :)...1..k.t, .—ikA--N 0---Gt • _,N__ .:4 • LO b e..,_ .,,' O Optional: Name: L'S Email: Email: 1..._ sc._ 4 ae 60,5 is.--k--- ."----7 ' \kJ - Nive-4-4 Lt2"(2- c ' 14k- NO<ft Wo\utvt Uivtc.d1-\ DeOle Oat r e-ceiz__ wc..ecc.2 , co-ricvme a_19-0-4 [buidAcki svtircoo,i, avt,u) (A; - 16•1-c 1 ) Jk Lv Orva,frley VI( c UtiffitY-0( Optional: Name: Email: (te,,,, (79 DivA Cr;; i1- c.'I+i. If?, ; C Ovn zgio-ate_d,c4 1-100 C 0-400A o [ c-(5-ce Db.( ,Lt flc,„.5t JAALA-t ; 5 Please share your comments below: (Y c j 4-9 o -RA L.0--1-11 : al ,‘ 5 c_ PIA. CH1— VJJ t,çr c.t. tAh- erob,6) f #1, s kA) 1<c_e LA5 cio XL" f 0)) er i2ece La? ix, 14 11-4° 2O' e' 5+"7 rc? COMMENT CARD Please share your comments below: e>1---fr-vi A z7V,e' /Yo,,fr7 Co', Ir&// ar&i-e or? *7)) aØI4'4& h,271, 1170,d/a,/(Cr oVe/- 7);2g. Optional: NameL Email: 7/ /0 Air-6 rt t7—S72/7:2127 yam, 0-'7 1 Liz Moore From:Chad Millner Sent:Tuesday, February 27, 2018 2:58 PM To:'Mike Anderson' Subject:RE: Noise Wall TH-169 NB Mike, Thanks for the note. So far I would say there is support for both projects. Mostly positive comments. It feels like wood is the preference but there been some comments about concrete on the south one. Thanks for attending and glad you found it helpful, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 952‐826‐0318 | Fax 952‐826‐0392 cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Mike Anderson [mailto:mvanders51@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 11:29 AM To: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Noise Wall TH‐169 NB Hi Chad, I attended the open house discussion on the potential noise wall project along Lincoln Dr. I found the information you presented to be very helpful in my understanding of project details. I would be very much in favor of adding the new sound wall. Either wood or concrete is fine with me. Also wondering whether you are getting positive or negative feedback on this project so far? Thanks again for the open house discussion. You did a great job! Michael Anderson 6991 Langford Ct Edina, Mn 55436‐ 218‐324‐1437 Sent from my iPad 1 Liz Moore From:Chad Millner Sent:Wednesday, February 28, 2018 1:47 PM To:'Paulsen, Grace C' Subject:RE: Noise Wall Improvement TH-169 Thanks for the comments. And yes, we will continue to communicate as we work through the project. Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392 cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Paulsen, Grace C [mailto:GPaulsen@CBBURNET.COM] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 1:45 PM To: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Paulsen, Grace C <GPaulsen@CBBURNET.COM> Subject: Noise Wall Improvement TH‐169 Chad: A note of thanks for bringing us together for a comprehensive meeting about the Noise Wall Improvement on TH-169. To me it is long over-due. I did attend a meeting several years ago about this exact issue and as you know it fell on def ears. I hope we can move forward with this project as soon as possible. I vote for a concrete wall. Your renderings of the two different walls (wood & concrete) were outstanding. I look forward to any additional information as it becomes available. Again, thank you. Gracie Paulsen 6995 Langford Court Edina, MN 55436 Gracie Paulsen ABR GRI CRS Coldwell Banker Burnet Edina Regional Office 7550 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 gpaulsen@cbburnet.com Office: 952‐946‐1714 Cell: 612‐669‐9025 *Wire Fraud is Real*. Before wiring any money, call the intended recipient at a number you know is valid to confirm the instructions. Additionally, please note that the sender does not have authority to bind a party to a real estate contract via written or verbal communication. 1 Liz Moore From:Ryan Hoch <rmhoch@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, April 3, 2018 1:35 PM To:Chad Millner Subject:South 169 Sound Wall Dear Mr. Millner – I am writing to express my strong support in building the soundwall on highway 169 (especially the portion south of Highway 62). Also, I believe extending the height of the full wall to the existing wall on McCauley Trail (rather than a step down) would be very helpful, as the houses located where the current wall ends on McCauley are located higher than the houses that would be covered by the wall further to the south. Thank you for considering this project. I believe it is definitely needed for this area. – Ryan Ryan Hoch 6737 Apache Road Highway 169 Council Meeting April 17, 2018 Project Details www.EdinaMN.gov 2 • • • Location Maps www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Project Details •20-ft high Wood or Concrete Wall (estimate in letter to residents based on wood) •Located within Highway 169 Right- of-Way •Design and Administration by MnDOT www.EdinaMN.gov 4 Funding •MnDOT’s Noise Wall Policy •10% Local is funded by special assessments –City Policy •Special assessments are assigned to adjacent properties that stand to benefit from construction improvements. www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Funding / Costs •Decibel Reduction = Benefit = Assessment *181 REU’s –130 Lincoln Apartments ~72% * includes inflation and contingency * www.EdinaMN.gov 6 North Wall Total Est. Cost Est.Assessments Wood $682,000 $300-$500 per REU Concrete $1,370,000 $540-$940 per REU South Wall Total Est. Cost Est.Assessments Wood $1,600,000 $1,000-$3,000 per REU Concrete $2,260,000 $2,000-$5,500 per REU Payment Options •Timing for the assessment 2022 or 2023 - •Assessments are payable over 15 years •Payment options: www.EdinaMN.gov 7 MnDOT Sound Model www.EdinaMN.gov 8 Public Comments •Feb. 26, 2018 Informational Meeting 26-30 People Attended Wood wall more supported vs concrete wall –cost South wall –some discussion about concrete www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Schedule •Feb. 2018 Informational Meeting •April 17, 2018 Council Resolution of Support •2020 / 2021 Public Hearing with Council •2021 / 2022 Construction •2022 / 2023 Assessment Hearing www.EdinaMN.gov 10 Before and After Graphics www.EdinaMN.gov 11 Before and After Graphics www.EdinaMN.gov 12 Before and After Graphics www.EdinaMN.gov 13 Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 14 Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Edina Dockless Bike Sharing Pilot Program Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the preparation of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with LimeBike to provide bike sharing services on a trial basis for 2018. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report and sample MOU. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Dockless Bike Sharing Pilot Program Draft MOU Between City of Golden Valley and LimeBike April 17, 2018 Mayor and City Council Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Edina Dockless Bike Sharing Pilot Program Information / Background: For the past several years Edina residents, the development community and City Council have discussed with staff the possibility of Edina participating in a bike sharing program. However, the operating model of the sole provider of such services in the Twin Cities – NiceRide Minnesota – does not offer services beyond the Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul. Additionally, the infrastructure costs associated with docking stations can be significant. At its April 3 meeting, City Council received a presentation about the recent Speak Up, Edina! conversation regarding bike sharing in Edina. Based on the interest expressed by the community, staff and City officials, staff would like to continue discussing this topic with Council and ask for their verbal support to proceed with the preparation of a draft memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Neutron Holdings, Inc. (LimeBike) for a trial or “pilot” dockless bike sharing program in 2018. Staff recommends that this trial service runs from early June to the end of the year. Based on the experiences with LimeBike during the pilot program, staff will make recommendations regarding future bike sharing arrangements. Nearby suburban cities (including Golden Valley, St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale, New Hope and others) are also considering agreements with LimeBike; Edina staff has met with staff from these communities (and the City of Minneapolis) to discuss mutual concerns as well as issues that may arise when bicycles are left in neighboring communities. This group plans to meet on a monthly basis, should they implement dockless bike share systems (the City of Minneapolis will be transitioning to a dockless bike share system starting this year and continuing through 2021 with a different vendor). Buck Humphrey, representing LimeBike, will give a presentation on how LimeBike’s system works, some of the lessons learned in other communities, and how they propose to operate a pilot program in Edina. Mr. Humphrey and City staff will answer questions posed by Council regarding the same. STAFF REPORT Page 2 For your information, attached is the draft MOU regarding bike sharing services that the City of Golden Valley is currently considering. The Edina City Attorney has reviewed this MOU and has no issues with it. Staff anticipates that an Edina/LimeBike MOU might look similar to this and could be considered by the Council as soon as May 1 with verbal support tonight. Common Questions About Dockless Bike Sharing and LimeBike 1. Does it cost the agency anything to have them operate in our community? • No. There is no cost to the City for this service. City staff time will be utilized to monitor the program as well as to engage with both other jurisdictions and LimeBike, but there is no financial cost to the City. 2. How does it work? • Bikes are checked out and unlocked using a cell phone app. Fees are based on the type of bike and how long it is used. 3. How is dockless (LimeBike) different from dock-based (Nice Ride)? • Dockless bikes do not require docks. They can be located using either GPS (via a smartphone app) or by simply finding one on the street. Users ride to their destination and then lock the bike, leaving it in an appropriate place anywhere that serves their needs. • Since people can take dockless bikes where they want to go, versus where someone has decided to place stations, LimeBike can more easily serve diverse neighborhoods and the needs of all citizens. • Due to the relatively low cost of building and maintaining a dockless bike sharing operation, LimeBike is able to keep usage costs low - $1/30 minute ride for their standard pedal bikes. They also offer discounts for low income populations. Dockless bike sharing can provide more social equity than dock-based systems. • LimeBike is innovating quickly. In addition to dock free pedal bikes, they now offer dock free electric-assist pedal bikes as well as fully electric scooters. 4. Where will the bikes be left? • LimeBike works with cities to identify best practices; in nearly all cities, bikes are typically left within the right-of-way in designated areas. 5. Do bikes end up in other locations? • Yes. LimeBike has staff that service the area to bring bikes back to appropriate locations or users may be given free uses to return bikes that are outside the designated area. To provide a service that complements privately owned automobiles, LimeBike gives people the ability to cross jurisdictional boundaries to get where they want to go. 6. How many bikes will be implemented with the pilot? • To be determined in collaboration with LimeBike’s City partners. LimeBike is working toward a summer launch of the western suburbs, and LimeBike’s early data suggests a pilot of approximately 750-1000 bikes spread across the geography could be appropriate. Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Bike Sharing Services This Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) is made by and between the City of Golden Valley, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation (the “City”) and Neutron Holdings, Inc. DBA LimeBike ("LimeBike") a _______ corporation with its principle place of business at __________________. RECITALS 1. The City wishes to encourage safe and affordable multi-modal transportation options to all residents, reduce traffic congestion, and maximize carbon free mobility. 2. Bike share and related services are a component to help the City achieve its transportation goals and the City desires to encourage the provision of bike share services to residents and those who work in the City. 3. LimeBike is a provider of bike share and related mobility products and services and wishes to operate a bike share program within the City. 4. LimeBike possesses GPS, 3G, and self-locking technology in its bike fleet such that bikes may be locked and opened by users with an app and tracked to provide data for operations and maintenance. TERMS OF UNDERSTANDING 1. Definitions. a. “Bicycles” means all standard pedal bicycles, electric assist model bicycles and related mobility products such as electric scooters owned by LimeBike. b. “Program” means the bike share program operated by LimeBike in the City of Golden Valley and described in this MOU. c. “Public Way” means public right of way, sidewalks, bike trails, parks, and any other property owned by the City and open to the public. 2. Use of City Property. The City authorizes LimeBike to use the Public Way for the purposes set forth in Section 3 of this MOU and subject to the limitations set forth in herein. This authorization is not a lease or an easement, and is not intended and shall not be construed to transfer any real property interest in City property. 3. Permitted Use. LimeBike and its customers may use the Public Way for riding and parking Bicycles owned and maintained by LimeBike and currently in use in the Program. LimeBike shall not place or attach any personal property, fixtures, or structures to public or private property without the prior written consent of the owner. a. Use of the Public Way and LimeBike’s operations within the City shall not: i. Adversely affect the public’s use of the Public Way; ii. Adversely affect any private property; iii. Inhibit pedestrian or vehicular movement within or along the Public Way or any other property, whether public or private; or iv. Create conditions which are a threat to public safety or security. 4. LimeBike’s Role and Responsibilities. LimeBike agrees to assume the following roles and responsibilities: a. Serve as a Point of Contact as follows: i. Designate a local person to serve as the central point of contact for communication with the City and its representatives regarding the Program. ii. Establish a system to receive notifications from the public (including a 24 hour service) regarding broken, damaged or otherwise unusable Bicycles and abandoned Bicycles or Bicycles that have been placed in inappropriate locations. b. Monitor Bicycles as follows: i. Monitor Bicycle locations 24 hours per day to promptly identify and remedy breaches of the deployment and parking guidelines in this MOU. ii. Provide adequate resources to receive and act on complaints from the public and the City in accordance with the timelines outlined in Exhibit A to this MOU. iii. Prohibit any person under the age of 15 from operating an electric-assisted Bicycle of any kind. iv. Equip all Bicycles to comply with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes section 169.222, subdivision 6 “Bicycle Equipment.” c. Abide by the following Deployment and Density Guidelines: i. Bicycles shall be evenly disbursed throughout the City to in a manner that accounts for citizen demand. LimeBike shall not deploy Bicycles at inappropriate densities and shall monitor Bicycle density at least once every day and relocate Bicycles as needed to comply with these density requirements. ii. LimeBike shall deploy Bicycles in a manner consistent with the parking guidelines in this MOU and shall not obstruct footpaths; trails; grassy areas; parking lots or parking spaces of any kind, including street parking, whether public or privately owned; outdoor businesses; building entrances; driveways; bike lanes; or parks. iii. LimeBike shall deploy and maintain in service a level of Bicycles sufficient to satisfy the demand of the City’s residents and vistors. Bicycles will initially be phased into deployment over a 6-week period and the number of Bicycles in LimeBike’s fleet may be increased based on usage and demand. The City may require LimeBike to decrease the number of Bicycles in its fleet at any time. d. Abide by the following Parking Guidelines: i. LimeBike shall encourage appropriate rider behavior by providing customer education materials that, at a minimum, contain all of the requirements of Minnesota Statutes section 169.222 “Operation of a Bicycle.” Educational materials need not be available in print but shall be available in LimeBike’s App, and on its website. ii. Bicycles must not obstruct safe, accessible and equitable access for people walking or traveling along the street, sidewalk or bike lanes. iii. Where possible, Bicycles must be parked near existing bike parking. iv. Bicycles must not be parked on sidewalks, paths or trails that are too narrow or busy or in any place where they could pose a safety hazard. v. Bicycles must not be parked on ramps or steps or in places where they interfere with directional assistance to people with vision impairment. vi. Bicycles must not be parked in traffic islands, in the street, or in a manner that obstructs the sightlines of any intersection. Bicycles parked between the curb and the sidewalk must be parked at least 2 feet from the edge of the curb so as to minimize the risk of Bicycles falling into the street. vii. Bicycles must be parked upright and may not be leaned against trees, buildings, poles, traffic lights, benches, or any other structure. viii. Bicycles must not obstruct access to or from any building. ix. Bicycles shall not be parked in landscaped areas. x. The City may, at any time and in its sole discretion, designate certain areas where Bicycles may not be parked. e. Abide by the following Collection, Relocation and Maintenance Guidelines: i. All Bicycles deployed by LimeBike in the City shall be "smart bikes" equipped with self-locking technology and GPS or another comparable tracking technology that allows LimeBike to manage its Bicycle fleet in accordance with the requirements herein. ii. LimeBike shall cover all maintenance costs for its Bicycles and shall maintain them in an excellent state of cleanliness and repair, in compliance with the requirements of Minnesota Statutes section 169.222, and at or above the performance and service benchmarks identified in Exhibit B. At a minimum, 90% of deployed Bicycles shall be operable at all times. iii. Ensure that all Bicycles are identifiable as LimeBike Bicycles. iv. Any third-party advertising on the Bicycles or in LimeBike’s App shall be approved by the City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. 5. The City’s Role. The City may, in its sole discretion, support the Program by designating certain areas as recommended Bicycle parking spots to assist with the orderly parking of Bicycles throughout the City. The City may also, in its sole discretion, engage local stakeholders by promoting and drawing attention to the Program. 6. Condition of City Property. The City makes the public way available to LimeBike in “as is” condition and makes no representations or warranties concerning the condition of the public way or its suitability for use by LimeBike or its customers. The City assumes no duty to warn either LimeBike or its customers concerning conditions that exist now or may arise in the future. 7. Maintenance and Care of Property: LimeBike expressly agrees to repair, replace or otherwise restore any part or item of real or personal property that is damaged, lost or destroyed as a result of the LimeBike’s operations. Should LimeBike fail to repair, replace or otherwise restore such real or personal property, LimeBike expressly agrees to reimburse the City for the full cost it incurs to repair, replace or restore the damaged property. 8. Indemnification. LimeBike shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, invitees and volunteers (collectively “City Parties”) from any liability, claims, demands, suits, penalties, personal injury, judgments and costs of any kind whatsoever (collectively, “Claims”), including but not limited to Claims for bodily injury, loss of life or damage to property, arising out of or in any way relating to or resulting, whether wholly or in part, from: a. The acts or omissions of LimeBike; b. LimeBike’s use of or entry upon City property or the Public Way, or any third party’s use of City Property or the Public Way at the invitation or sufferance of LimeBike; c. Use of LimeBike’s Bicycles by any individual, regardless of whether such use was with or without the permission of LimeBike and regardless of whether such use was on public or private property. 9. Limitation of Liability. The City assumes no liability for loss or damage to LimeBike's Bicycles or other property or for damages to any third-party or the property of another arising out of or in any way relating to or resulting from LimeBike’s operations. The City shall not be responsible for providing security at any location where LimeBike's Bicycles are stored or located. LimeBike hereby waives any claim against the City in the event LimeBike’s Bicycles or other property are lost or damaged. 10. Insurance. LimeBike shall procure and maintain for the duration of this agreement insurance that meets the following minimum requirements: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance with coverage limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate. Said policy shall include coverage for bodily injury, personal injury, property damage, personal and advertising injury and blanket contractual liability. b. Business Automobile Liability Insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and with coverage for claims of damages for bodily injury, including death, and for claims for property damage resulting from the ownership, operation, maintenance or use of all automobiles which may arise from LimeBike’s operations. The following coverages must be included: Owned, Hired, and Non-owned Automobiles. Each insurance policy shall name the City, including its elected officials, employees and agents, as an additional insured using ISO Form CG 20 10 or equivalent, and shall be endorsed to state that Coverage shall not be suspended, voided, or cancelled by either party, or reduced in coverage or in limits unless the City has been given 30 calendar days’ prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, or 10 days’ written notice for non-payment of premium. Each policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, including its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents for losses arising from LimeBike’s activities. LimeBike’s policies shall be procured from an insurance company having an AM BEST rating of A- or better and authorized to do business in the state of Minnesota. Said policies shall be primary, non-contributory to any other insurance available to the City and shall be provided on an occurrence basis. Any insurance available in excess of the minimum limits required herein shall be available to the City. LimeBike shall submit proof of insurance acceptable to the City as evidence of the required insurance coverage requirements. Umbrella or excess liability insurance may be used to supplement the policy limits to satisfy the required policy limits. The City reserves the right to immediately terminate this MOU if LimeBike is not in compliance with the insurance requirements and retains all rights to pursue any legal remedies against the LimeBike. All insurance policies must be open to inspection by the City, and copies of policies must be submitted to the City’s authorized representative upon written request. 11. Compliance with Law. LimeBike at its own cost and expense, shall comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements of all governmental entities applicable to its use of the Public way, its use of City property, and the operation of the Program, including but not limited to laws governing operation of bicycles in Minnesota. If any license, permit, or other governmental authorization is required for LimeBike's lawful use or occupancy of City property or any portion thereof, LimeBike shall procure and maintain such license, permit and governmental authorization throughout the term of this MOU. The City shall reasonably cooperate with LimeBike, at no additional cost to City, to assist LimeBike in complying with this Section. LimeBike shall abide by all City ordinances and rules governing the use of the public way and City property to efficiently and effectively provide the services contemplated in this MOU. 12. Required Reports. LimeBike shall provide reports to the City containing, at a minimum, the performance, utilization and service metrics indicated in Exhibit B. LimeBike shall provide such reports at least quarterly and shall cooperate with the City in the collection and analysis of aggregated data concerning its operations. 13. No Joint Venture. Nothing herein shall be in any way construed as expressing or implying that LimeBike and the City have joined together in any joint venture or are in any manner agreeing to or contemplating the sharing of profits and losses among themselves in relation to any matter relating to this MOU. 14. Term. This MOU shall commence on April 1, 2018, (the "Commencement Date") and shall expire on December 31, 2018, unless earlier terminated pursuant to Section 15, below. 15. Termination. This MOU may be terminated prior to the expiration date set forth in Section 14 above under the following circumstances: a. By the City, with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to LimeBike. b. By LimeBike, with or without cause, upon 180 days’ written notice to the City. c. If either party attempts to transfer or assign this MOU, either party may terminate this MOU and such termination shall be effective immediately. Upon termination or expiration of this MOU, LimeBike shall, at its sole cost and expense, immediately remove all of its Bicycles and property from the Public Way. 16. Amendment. The parties may amend this MOU by mutual written agreement. Any such amendment shall only be effective if duly executed by the authorized representatives of each party. 17. Permits. The City shall notify LimeBike of any local permits required for LimeBike’s operation. 18. Applicable Law and Venue. The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern the interpretation and enforcement of this MOU and any actions arising out of or relating to this MOU shall be brought in Hennepin County District Court in the state of Minnesota. 19. Notice. Any notice, demand or request required to be given under this agreement shall be deemed given or made when delivered in person, by mail or by email to a party at its address specified below: If to the City: If to LimeBike: City of Golden Valley Attn: Marc Nevinski 7800 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55427 mnevinski@goldenvalleymn.gov 20. Counterparts. This agreement may be executed simultaneously or in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Executed the day and year first above written, by the parties as follows: NEUTRON HOLDINGS, DBA LIMEBIKE: CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY: By: _________________________________ Name: ______________________________ Title: _______________________________ By: _________________________________ Shepard M. Harris, Mayor By: _________________________________ Timothy J. Cruikshank, City Manager Exhibit A: Collection, Relocation and Maintenance Guidelines Incident Required Response Time Required Action Dangerously placed Bicycle Within 2 hours of report Where a Bicycle is causing an unreasonable hazard (i.e. parked across a road, bike lane, etc.) LimeBike shall relocate the Bicycle within 2 hours. The City may remove and impound the Bicycle at any time and may charge LimeBike an impound fee as reimbursement for the actual cost to the City of impounding the Bicycle. Bicycle reported as faulty / damaged / unsafe Upon receipt LimeBike shall immediately deactivate the Bicycle from service. LimeBike shall check the Bicycle for safety concerns, damage, and other faults and shall remove the Bicycle from service until it is repaired. Inappropriate bicycle density Within 24 hours of report Where excessive numbers of Bicycles are present, LimeBike shall reduce the number of Bicycles at a single location by relocating the excessive Bicycles. Bicycle tipped- over Within 24 hours of report LimeBike shall upright bicycle. Inappropriately placed Bicycle Within 24 hours of report Where a Bicycle is parked in an inappropriate location, but where it is not causing an unreasonable hazard, LimeBike shall relocate the Bicycle. Exhibit B: Reporting Requirements Description of LimeBike’s Service Level Agreement The following performance indicators shall be met and reported to help the City measure LimeBike’s success serving its citizens and improving livability and mobility in the City. Performance Indicator Description Measurement Tool Minimum Performance Standard Reporting Frequency App & customer service support portal LimeBike reservation system fully operational Uptime reporting 99.5% uptime. quarterly Bicycle distribution Maps identifying trends in peak Bicycle distribution Maps showing aggregate usage patterns Fleet will focus on serving the City of Golden Valley quarterly Bicycles in service Bicycles in service Daily uptime reports LimeBike shall deploy and maintain in service a level of Bicycles sufficient to satisfy the demand of the City’s residents and visitors. Bicycles will be phased into deployment over a 6-week period and may be increased based on usage and demand. The City may require LimeBike to decrease the number of Bicycles in its fleet at any time. quarterly Report- responsive Response time to incident reports contained in Exhibit A. Log showing length of time between reported incident and LimeBike response See Exhibit A quarterly Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark K Nolan, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:2017 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Report Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The attached staff report summarizes how the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund was budgeted and utilized in 2017. This annual report was presented to the Transportation Commission at their March 15 meeting. Staff will present this report, along with anticipated PACS-funded projects for 2018 and 2019. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: 2017 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Summary Table: 2017 PACS Fund Expenditures Map: 2017 PACS Fund Projects Staff Presentation April 17, 2018 Mayor and City Council Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Summary Report: 2017 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Information / Background: Below is a summary of how the PACS Fund was budgeted and utilized in 2017. Its primary intent is to indicate what share non-motorized transportation infrastructure construction projects have of the Fund’s expenditures for last year, in addition to general information for 2017. As shown below (and in the attached table), the PACS Funds available in 2017 was $985,240. This includes a “negative” rollover of $190,845 of PACS Funds from 2016. This is due to some 2016 construction costs being higher than expected, as well as delayed grant payments from Hennepin County. Note that only approximately $11,000 is estimated to roll over from 2017 into the 2018 (current) PACS Fund. $973,930 of available funds (see attached summary table) was spent on PACS-related projects and items in 2017 (a decrease of approximately $940,000 or 97% over 2016). This decrease in available PACS Funds was expected and results from the significant Fund rollover from 2015 to 2016 (note that the annual PACS Fund revenue from franchise fees is approximately $1.2 million). Of the $973,930, nearly 80% ($774,842) was spent on construction projects, with over 59% spent on sidewalks and new bike facilities. Of the 2017 sidewalk and bicycle projects expenditures, 65% went to projects associated with the 2016 Neighborhood Roadway Improvement and State-Aid reconstruction projects, while the remaining 35% went to “stand-alone” projects. The percentage of funds spent on Neighborhood Roadway Improvement projects was higher in 2017 when compared to past years. Overall, approximately 2.2 miles of new sidewalk was installed in 2017 using the PACS Fund, a decrease of 0.9 miles (or 29%) over 2016. This is due to the lower amount of available funds as described above, as well as the relatively higher share of funds spent on pedestrian crossing/safety improvements (21% of overall PACS Funds expenditures). STAFF REPORT Page 2 Please note that while most of the costs indicated on the attached table are actual construction costs, some costs are estimated based on pending final payments to contractors (some of which will be paid for out of 2018 PACS Funds). The construction costs above also do not include approximately $150,400 in grants from Hennepin County (for the 2016 Xerxes Ave S and 2018 France Ave sidewalk projects), as these will be credited to the 2018 PACS Fund when they are received later this year. Additionally, as of the time of this memorandum the 2017 utility franchise fees for the fourth quarter have yet to be received; these have been estimated. PACS Project Type Cost Total Percentage Sidewalks & Bike Facilities $574,328 58.6% Pedestrian Crossing Improvements $204,313 21.0% Total Construction: $774,842 79.6% Consulting Fees $77,470 8.0% Other (labor, etc.) $121,618 12.5% Total Fees/Other: $199,088 20.4% Total 2016 PACS Expenditures: $973,930 100.0% 20 1 7 Pe d e s t r i a n an d Cy c l i s t Sa f e t y Fu n d Ex p e n d i t u r e s Av a i l a b l e PA C S Fu n d s (2 0 1 7 ut i l i t y fr a n c h i s e fees + 2016 rollover ) = 9 8 5 , 2 4 0 $ 95 % of PA C S Fu n d s (use for 2017 budget) = 9 3 5 , 9 7 8 $ Pr o j e c t Ty p e S t r e e t / I t e m L o c a t i o n Ma p Ke y Ap p r o x . LF of Fa c i l i t y No t e s C o s t Ha n s e n Ro a d (w e s t sid e ) D a r c y Ln to W 60 t h St Va l l e y Vi e w Ro a d / Ma d d o x La n e (n o r t h si d e ) C o d e Av e to Tr a c y Av e Ol i n g e r Ro a d (w e s t si d e ) V e r n o n Av e to Ol i n g e r Bl v d B 1 , 6 1 5 C o u n t r y s i d e G Ne i g h b o r h r o o d Im p r o v e m e n t s 5 4 , 9 4 4 $ Oa k l a w n Av e n u e (w e s t sid e ) W 72 n d St to so u t h of Gi l f o r d Av e C 1 , 5 0 0 A c t i v e Ro u t e s to Sc h o o l Re c o m m e n d a t i o n 1 8 4 , 0 0 2 $ Pa r k l a w n Av e n u e (w e s t / n o r t h sid e ) W 76 t h St to Fr a n c e Av e D 9 3 0 M u n i c i p a l St a t e Ai d ro a d re c o n s t r u c t i o n 1 4 , 7 0 1 $ Ed i n a In d u s t r i a l Bo u l e v a r d (s o u t h si d e ) M e t r o Blv d to No r m a n d a l e Bl v d E 4 7 0 C o n s t r u c t e d by Pu b l i c Wo r k s cr e w s (materials) 4 , 8 5 8 $ Fi n a l pa y m e n t s fo r 20 1 6 pr o j e c t s 104,981 $ Ve r n o n Av e n u e (2 0 1 6 pr o j e c t ) G l e a s o n Rd to Bl a k e Rd H e n n e p i n Co u n t y gr a n t pa y m e n t for 2016 project (39,050)$ Va l l e y Vi e w Ro a d (2 0 1 5 st a t e ‐ai d pr o j e c t ) M c C a u l e y Tr to Ma r k Te r r a c e Dr S t a t e ‐Aid re i m b u r s e m e n t fo r 20 1 5 project (74,082)$ La k e Ed i n a tr a i l co n n e c t i n to Ni n e Mi l e Cr e e k Re g Tr H i b i s c u s Av e to Ni n e Mi l e Cr e e k Re g Tr F 5 0 0 C o n s t r u c t e d by Pu b l i c Wo r k s cr e w s ‐‐ W 70 t h St r e e t H w y 10 0 to Va l l e y Vi e w Rd R e p l a c e bi k e sy m b o l ma r k i n g s (maintenance) 4 , 3 5 2 $ Va l l e y Vi e w Ro a d Pe d e s t r i a n Br i d g e V a l l e y Vi e w Rd / Co u r t n e y Fi e l d tr a i l G C o n s u l t a n t an d co n s t r u c t i o n fe e s 1 8 4 , 0 9 5 $ Ne w "R R F B " Pe d e s t r i a n Cr o s s i n g W 50 t h St & Ed e n Av e H P e d e s t a l ‐mo u n t e d , pe d e s t r i a n ‐activated flashers 1 2 , 7 5 5 $ Ne w "R R F B " Pe d e s t r i a n Cr o s s i n g C a h i l l Rd & Am u n d s o n Av e I P e d e s t a l ‐mo u n t e d , pe d e s t r i a n ‐activated flashers 7 , 4 6 3 $ Do n c a s t e r Wa y Pe d e s t r i a n Cr o s s i n g Im p r o v e m e n t s D o n c a s t e r Wa y & en t r a n c e to Hi g h l a n d s J C o n s t r u c t e d by Pu b l i c Wo r k s cr e w s ‐‐ Va l l e y Vi e w Ro a d Pe d e s t r i a n Cr o s s i n g Im p r o v e m e n t s V a l l e y Vi e w Rd & en t r a n c e to Hi g h Sc h o o l K C o n s t r u c t e d by Pu b l i c Wo r k s cr e w s ‐‐ Pe d e s t r i a n an d Bi c y c l e Ma s t e r Pl a n Pl a n n i n g / e n g i n e e r i n g fe e s 5 8 , 4 0 4 $ Va l l e y Vi e w Ro a d Sid e w a l k Co n c e p t De s i g n W e s t of Gl e a s o n Rd E n g i n e e r i n g fe e s 1 9 , 0 6 6 $ Li v i n g St r e e t s "C h a m p i o n s " Ph o t o g r a p h y , pr i n t i n g fe e s 5 5 6 $ St a f f La b o r Co s t s , In t e r n a l Se r v i c e Fu n d On e FT E (d i r e c t an d in d i r e c t la b o r costs) 1 2 1 , 0 6 2 $ TOTAL 2014: 9 7 3 , 9 3 0 $ * So m e co s t s ab o v e ar e es t i m a t e d , pe n d i n g fi n a l co n t r a c t o r pa y m e n t s an d re c e i p t of fo u r t h ‐qu a r t e r 20 1 7 ut i l i t y fr a n c h i s e fe e s Remaining in 2017 budget: ( 3 7 , 9 5 2 ) $ Rollover to 2016: 1 1 , 3 1 0 $ 315,823 $ Ot h e r Co n s u l t a n t Fe e s Bi r c h c r e s t A / Co u n t r y s i d e B Ne i g h b o r h o o d Improvements 7, 2 5 0 A Pe d e s t r i a n Sa f e t y Si d e w a l k Bi k e Fa c i l i t y ?ÞA@ ?úA@ ?úA@ ?ÞA@ A B C DE FG H I K J Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake C e n t e n n i a l L a k e Minnehaha Creek Ni ne Mile Creek Nine Mile Creek C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d C a n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St PetersLutheran School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance PublicLibrary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool HighlandSchool EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace School SouthviewMiddleSchool CountrysideSchool Valley ViewMiddle School Creek Valley School NormandaleElementary EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessor CalvinChristianSchool FireStation B L A K E R D S C H A E F E R R D V E R N O N A V E F R A N C E A V E S X E R X E S A V E S C A H I L L R D 70TH ST W 66TH ST W Y O R K A V E S INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 4 4 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W G L E A S O N R D 70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W /Engineering DeptMarch 2018 Legend ExistingSidewalk City of Edina2017 PACS Fund Projects FutureActive RoutesTo School Sidewalk Future State-Aid Sidewalk FutureCity Sidewalk Nine Mile CreekRegional Trail 2017 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund: Summary Report City Council April 17, 2018 Agenda •How Was the PACS Fund Used in 2017? •Comparison with 2014- 2016 Fund Usage •2017 Project Photos •Proposed 2018 PACS Fund Projects www.EdinaMN.gov 2 PACS Fund Overview •Approved by Council Dec 2012 •Revenue from utility franchise fees ~ $1.2 million annually •Used exclusively for non-motorized transportation network •Bias towards construction for early years of Fund www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Review of 2017 PACS Fund •$985,240 available in 2017 •$973,930 spent on PACS projects (80% on construction) www.EdinaMN.gov 4 PACS Project Type Cost Total Percentage Sidewalks & Bike Facilities $574,328 58.6% Pedestrian Crossing Improvements $204,313 21.0% Total Construction:$774,842 79.6% Consulting Fees $77,470 8.0% Other (labor, etc.)$121,618 12.5% Total Fees/Other:$199,088 20.4% Total 2016 PACS Expenditures: $973,930 100.0% 2014-2017 PACS Funds www.EdinaMN.gov 5 www.EdinaMN.gov 6 Doncaster Way / Highlands Pedestrian Crossing W 50th St / Eden Ave RRFB 2017 PACS Fund Project Locations Olinger Road Sidewalk www.EdinaMN.gov 7 Valley View Rd / Maddox Ln Sidewalk Valley View Road / Roundabout Pedestrian Bridge 2017 PACS Fund Project Locations www.EdinaMN.gov 8 Cahill Road / Amundson RRFB Industrial Boulevard Sidewalk 2017 PACS Fund Project Locations www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Oaklawn Avenue Sidewalk Lake Edina Trail Connection to NMCRT 2017 PACS Fund Project Locations 2018 Proposed PACS Projects www.EdinaMN.gov 10 •W 60th St sidewalk (Concord G: School Rd to Concord Ave) •W 62nd St shared use path and sidewalk (State-Aid: Valley View Rd to France Ave) •Brookview Ave sidewalk (62nd St to Valley View Rd) 2018 Proposed PACS Projects www.EdinaMN.gov 11 •Valley View Rd sidewalk (ARTS: Gleason Rd to upper Mark Terrace Dr) •France Ave sidewalk (County grant, w/ St Louis Park: 39th St to 42nd St) www.EdinaMN.gov 12 •Interlachen Blvd & Vernon Ave pedestrian improvements (w/ intersection improvements) •W 69th St shared use path (w/ roundabout at Galleria/Southdale entrances) 2018 Proposed PACS Projects www.EdinaMN.gov 13 •Other sidewalk projects (potentially by Public Works) •Vernon Ave (Arcadia to SB Hwy 100 ramp) •Doncaster Way (Ayrshire to Highlands Park) •W 64th St (York Ave to Xerxes Ave) •W 74th St (east of Bush Lake Rd) 2018 Proposed PACS Projects Questions / Discussion www.EdinaMN.gov 14 Questions/ Discussion Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Sketch Plan Review: 4500 France Avenue Discussion CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: No action is requested. INTRODUCTION: Provide the applicant non-binding comments on a potential redevelopment application at 4500 France Avenue. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Review Memo Site Location & Small Area Plan Background Proposed Plans & Narrative 4500 France Developer Presentation City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861 Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com Date: April 11, 2018 To: Planning Commission From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director Re: Sketch Plan Review – 4500 France Avenue The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to redevelop the site at 4500 France Avenue. The applicant would tear down the former movie theater and dry cleaners building and build a new 52 unit rental apartment with 6,400 square feet of restaurant and retail space. There would be 77 underground parking stalls for the apartments and 40 covered parking stalls for the retail uses at grade. Amenities for the apartments include: a fitness center, rooftop patio, club room and an outdoor courtyard with grilling stations, seating and landscaping. The property is 1.05 acres (45,738 s.f.) in size. The density proposed in the project would be 50 units per acre. This site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as NN, Neighborhood Node, which allows over 12 units per acre up to a maximum height of 4-stories. The plans are generally consistent with the 44th & France Small Area Plan. (See portions of the Plan attached, including the guiding principles.) The applicant has responding the guiding principles within their narrative. The request would require the following: A Rezoning from R-1 and PCD-1 to PUD, Planned Commercial District. The table on the following page is a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the existing PCD-1 Standards on the lot. Please note that several variances would be required under the existing zoning standards. Flexibility is requested through the PUD in regard to setback and height. The PUD Zoning enables the City to require affordable housing. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Compliance Table City Standard (PCD-2) Proposed Lot line Street Front – France Avenue Front – Sunnyside Road Side – West Side – South 50 feet 50 feet 30 feet 50 feet 6 feet* 15 feet 5 feet* 16 feet 20 feet* (45 feet at the street) 20 feet* Building Height 2-stories & 24 feet 2 stories & 30 feet to 4 stories and 50 feet* Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 1.3* Density 12+ units per acre with a limit of 4 stories in height 50 units per acre & 4 stories Parking 6,413 s.f. spaces (40 spaces) 1.5 stalls/unit-1,500 s.f.+ (5)=8 enclosed 1 stall/unit under-1,500 s.f.(47)=47 enclosed 40 enclosed spaces 70 enclosed spaces *Variances required Highlights/Issues: The proposed mixed use re-development is generally consistent with the small area plan. Density and scale fit the Small Area Plan. Height matches adjacent single-family home height maximum. 10% of the area is proposed for affordable housing within the proposed project to meet the City’s affordable housing policy. Per the Small Area Plan, Open/Public space is suggested at the Sunnyside/France Avenue corner, and adjacent to the single-family homes on Sunnyside to provide a buffer. The applicant is open to ideas on how the Sunnyside Open space area could be used. Suggestions include: open green space with landscaping, future parking, art or memorial, park or plaza space. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Staff raises some concern that the building does not interact with the public realm open space on the west side of the project. There are no direct connections from the building to the green space. Pedestrian Connections/boulevard sidewalks. Curb cuts would be reduced and the sidewalk experience along Sunnyside and France would be enhanced. Store and building fronts. Should follow the guidelines in the Small Area Plan. Staff is concerned that the proposal along Sunnyside does not activate the street. There are no store fronts on that side, only parking for the retail. Project does minimize the impact of automobiles by providing all the parking within and under the development. The applicant would bury utility lines. Traffic and parking impact study required, but would likely generate less traffic than fully occupied retail uses. Hennepin County will need to review the elimination of the turn lane off Sunnyside. Plans were sent to the County for their review and input. Turning radius in the enclosed and underground parking area appears to be tight. Sustainability. The applicant has responded to the city’s Sustainability Questionaire. (See attached. 4500 FRANCE APARTMENTS Edina, MN SKETCH PLAN MEETING April 11, 2018 April 11, 2018 | 24500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Context Map SUNN Y S I D E R O A D W 44TH STREET FR A N C E A V E N U E S W 45TH STREET 30,695 SF Parking Elec Rm W a t e r R o o m Transformer locationat grade above PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S P1 Parking Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option April 11, 2018 | 34500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Retail Trade Area: 4500 France Avenue, Minneapolis, MN Surrounding Business Map 30,695 SF Parking Elec Rm W a t e r R o o m Transformer locationat grade above PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S P1 Parking Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option April 11, 2018 | 44500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Site Plan SUNN Y S I D E R O A D FR A N C E A V E N U E S W 45TH STREET 30,695 SF Parking Elec Rm W a t e r R o o m Transformer locationat grade above PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S P1 Parking Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option April 11, 2018 | 54500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Floor Plans France Avenue South Sunnyside Avenue West 45th Street 17,163 SF Parking 3,700 SF Restaurant 2,724 SF Lobby Parking Entry/Exit OutdoorSeating 528 SF Trash M a i l 1,525 SF Retail 1,188 SF Retail 901' 899' 897' 894' 892' 890' 899.5' 903' 904' 902' 900' 898.5' 898' 901' 900' 899' 900' 890' 2 2' - 0 " 1 8 ' - 0 " 815 SF Bikes 854 SF 1 BR 411 SF Stor 1,080 SF 2 BR Leasing Lounge 906' 908' 37,490 sf Trans 908' PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S Street Level Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option SUN N Y S I D E R O A D FR A N C E A V E N U E S W 45TH STREET Ground Floor Plan 30,695 SF Parking Elec Rm W a t e r R o o m Transformer locationat grade above PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S P1 Parking Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option April 11, 2018 | 64500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Floor Plans Elec 1,171 SF 2 BR 1,207 SF 2 BR 1,229 SF 2 BR 857 SF 1 BR 1,358 SF 2 BR 825 SF 1 BR 1,358 SF 2 BR 920 SF 1 BR DEN 830 SF 1 BR 830 SF 1 BR 792 SF 1 BR 1,136 SF 2 BR 797 SF 1 BR 1,040 SF 1 BR DEN Tr 904 SF 1 BR 830 SF 1 BR AmenityTerrace 1,978 SF Amenity 895 SF 1 BR1,086 SF 2 BR 669 SF 1 BR 774 SF 1 BR PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S Level 2 Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option 30,695 SF Parking Elec Rm W a t e r R o o m Transformer locationat grade above PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S P1 Parking Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option 2nd Floor Plan Scale: 1” = 30’-0” 3rd Floor Plan Elec 1,171 SF 2 BR 1,207 SF 2 BR 1,229 SF 2 BR 857 SF 1 BR 1,358 SF 2 BR 825 SF 1 BR 1,358 SF 2 BR 920 SF 1 BR DEN 830 SF 1 BR 830 SF 1 BR 791 SF 1 BR 791 SF 1 BR 792 SF 1 BR 1,136 SF 2 BR Storage 797 SF 1 BR 1,040 SF 1 BR DEN Tr 904 SF 1 BR 830 SF 1 BR 1,086 SF 2 BR 896 SF 1 BR 774 SF 1 BR669 SF 1 BR PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S Level 3 Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option April 11, 2018 | 74500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Floor Plans 30,695 SF Parking Elec Rm W a t e r R o o m Transformer locationat grade above PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S P1 Parking Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option 4th Floor Plan Scale: 1” = 30’-0” Roof Plan RooftopTerrace749 sf 580 SF Elevator PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S Roof Level Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option Elec 1,236 SF 2 BR1,508 SF 2 BR Tr 1,432 SF 2 BR Roof ofLevel Below 1,220 SF 2 BR1,665 SF 2 BR 1,960 SF 2 BR 1,551 SF 2 BR 1,753 SF 2 BR PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S Level 4 Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option April 11, 2018 | 84500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Parking Plans 30,695 SF Parking Elec Rm W a t e r R o o m Transformer locationat grade above PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S P1 Parking Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option Lower Level Parking Scale: 1” = 30’-0” 30,695 SF Parking Elec Rm W a t e r R o o m Transformer locationat grade above PLAN NORTH Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 4500 France Ave S P1 Parking Plan March 9, 2018 4-Story Option April 11, 2018 | 94500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA France Ave & Sunnyside AveCurrent Condition April 11, 2018 | 104500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA France Ave & Sunnyside AveProposed Development April 11, 2018 | 114500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA France Ave - Current Condition April 11, 2018 | 124500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA France Ave Proposed Development FRANCE AVENUE April 11, 2018 | 134500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Sunnyside AveCurrent Condition April 11, 2018 | 144500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Sunnyside AveProposed Development SUNNYSIDE A V E April 11, 2018 | 154500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Concept Rendering - Intersectionof France & Sunnyside FRANCE AV E N U E SUNN Y S I D E A V E April 11, 2018 | 164500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Concept Rendering - Aerial View of Corner Plaza SU N N Y S I D E A V E FRANCE A V E N U E April 11, 2018 | 174500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Concept Rendering - PedestrianView of Corner Plaza April 11, 2018 | 184500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Concept Rendering - SidewalkAlong France Avenue April 11, 2018 | 194500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Current And ProposedSunnyside Ave Building Heights 30’-0” Black Outline Denotes Existing Buildings 49’-4” Elev: 898’Elev: 906’ 8 FOOT ELEVATION DIFFERENCE ON SUNNYSIDE April 11, 2018 | 204500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Small Area Plan Principles 44th & France Small Area Plan Principles Guiding Principle #1 – Safe & Inviting: • Pedestrian safety is a primary focus • Eliminate the sharp right-hand turn lane from eastbound on Sunnyside to southbound on France • Additional space generated by removing the turn-lane will improve pedestrian safety Guiding Principle #2 – Community Gathering: • The removal of the sharp right will create an outdoor gathering area with landscaping and artwork • Public art piece for the corner • Purchase the home at 3907 Sunnyside Road to provide a buffer and creating: a. Open greenspace landscaped to match the development b. Future parking c. Service member & first-responder tribute or memorial d. Park or plaza space Guiding Principle #3 – Circulation and Connections: • Reduce curb cuts onto France Ave • The removal of the sharp right will ease bus stop access • A bike locker will be provided within the building and bike racks provided along France Ave • Enhanced boulevard with elevated landscaping beds Guiding Principle #4 – Neighborhood Oriented Business Mix: • Ownership of the adjacent property to the south features three locally-owned and operated businesses as tenants • Tenants for this project will likely include: a. A local restaurant tailored to the neighborhood b. Other retail focused Tenants c. All complimentary to existing retail uses Guiding Principle #5 – Housing: • Meet housing needs of a wide range of likely residents – from affordable units to penthouse units • Appealing to an aging demographic • Older residents moving from their homes creates housing options for younger families • The demographic mix of the project will offer solutions to young professionals and empty-nesters alike • Work with the Edina HRA to offer affordable units April 11, 2018 | 214500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Small Area Plan Principles • 44th & France Small Area Plan Principles Guiding Principle #6 – Height & Size of Buildings: • 4 stores along France Ave; 2.5 stories along Sunnyside Ave (height guidelines specified within the Small Area Plan) • Comparable density of nearby projects: Project Units Units/Acre Linden 43 29 63 Market Street 110 72 Elements 31 72 Proposed 52 53 Guiding Principle #7 – Parking: • 40 public parking stalls for retail use (6.25 / 1,000 sf) exceeding code guidelines • Residents’ private entrance to 77 underground stalls -- 1 stall per bedroom • Maintaining the current on-street parking on Sunnyside Avenue Guiding Principle #8 – Streets & Sidewalks: • Meeting/exceeding sidewalk widths; Pedestrian friendly boulevard; Seat height elevated planters • Large trees; Areas to congregate; Pedestrian protection • Maintain the existing free, on-street parking • Spur removal of power poles along France Avenue Guiding Principle #9 – Sustainability & Resiliency: • Current site is environmentally contaminated (petroleum, asbestos & other soil contaminants) • Current industrial dry-cleaning site as no on-site storm water management or renewal resources/initiatives • Redevelopment features storm-water management in accordance with all watershed guidelines • Bold greenspace elements including: large boulevard planters, a potential pocket park; preservation of two large trees on Sunnyside Avenue • Installation of electric car charging stations in the retail parking area; Electric car charging in all 77 private resident parking stalls • Green roofs and solar panels are being explored and considered • Building assemblies will include the latest in energy efficiency strategies to minimize impacts on the environment and reduce ongoing operating costs • Seeking assistance from the City, County and State agencies for clean-up and remediation Guiding Principles #10 & 11 – Visual Quality & Aesthetics: • Inspired by 1920’s era brick construction; Emulates the first buildings constructed within the Small Area Plan • Changed the exterior elements as building steps down to 2.5 stories to provide visual relief • Gives row-style townhome feel; Composed of stone, brick and metal on all public-facing facades • Raised sidewalk planters will include soft decorative lighting April 11, 2018 | 224500 FRANCE APARTMENTS - EDINA Project Metrics Site Area = Approx 43,124 sf or .99 acres LOBBY TRASH/ TOTAL GSF PARKING STALLS* RETAIL AMENITY STORAGE APT GSF APT RSF DUs LEVEL P1 30,695 30,695 70 LEVEL 1 30,213 17,163 40 6,413 2,724 1,754 2,159 1,934 2 LEVEL 2 25,449 2,003 23,446 19,498 20 LEVEL 3 25,449 25,449 21,080 22 LEVEL 4 14,581 14,581 12,336 8 ROOF 580 580 126,967 47,858 110 6,413 5,307 1,754 65,635 54,848 52 *Total does not include up to 7 Tandem spaces on Level P1 RSF/UNIT 1055 GSF/UNIT 1262 4500 France Apartments BUILDING AREA SUMMARY Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Scott H. Neal, City Manager Item Activity: Subject:Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Edina and the East Edina Housing Foundation Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the attached "Third Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Edina and the East Edina Housing Foundation," which provides an agreement for the funding of the Affordable Housing Manager position. This document has been drafted and edited by both the city attorney and foundation's attorney. INTRODUCTION: On April 3, 2018, the Edina Housing Foundation unanimously approved the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report: Affordable Housing Manager Proposal Third Amendment to Agreement between the City & the Foundation April 17, 2018 Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Scott Neal, City Manager Edina Affordable Housing Manager Proposal Information / Background: In the City’s 2017 biennial Quality of Life Survey, residents were asked to write in their own words what they felt was the most serious issue facing Edina. 31% of the comments were related to housing concerns, including tear downs, overdevelopment, affordability, etc. This was the highest ranked serious concern offered by Edina residents in the 2017 survey. The next highest ranked serious concern was traffic and infrastructure at 17%. We don’t need a community survey to tell us that the lack of affordable housing in Edina is a threat to the community’s future quality of life. We already know that. I believe it’s time that we - the City of Edina and the Edina Housing Foundation – decide to make Edina’s most serious issue a more serious organizational priority. The Foundation and the City have considerable human and fiscal resources that, if properly coordinated and managed, could make considerable progress to solving this issue in Edina. Both the City and the Foundation can look back in time and find past examples of affordable housing success. But, as long as affordable housing is not at the top of someone’s day-to-day prioritized work plan, we will not succeed in making sufficient progress in resolving it today. During the past five years, the City has experienced success in several specified policy areas by pursuing a strategy of identifying a revenue stream from the policy area in question and then using that dedicated revenue stream to employ a dedicated City staff person for whom the specified policy area is their highest, if not only, priority. This strategy has led to success in specific policy areas of economic development, pedestrian and cyclist transportation, conservation and sustainability planning and residential redevelopment management. I believe we should employ this same strategy for affordable housing. There is an existing agreement between the City and the Foundation that has been in place for over 30 years that describes the terms under which the City provides services to the Foundation. The agreement has enabled the City and the Foundation to maintain a close, positive working relationship over those thirty years; provide significant housing benefits to Edina residents; and, has allowed the Foundation to accomplish its mission without the administrative burdens and costs of having its own employees. I propose the City and the Foundation reaffirm their mutual dedication to the mission of resolving the housing STAFF REPORT Page 2 affordability issue is Edina by doubling down on the strengths of its past relationship by agreeing to the following: 1. The City will hire a new fulltime employee to be completely devoted to affordable housing issues in Edina. The employee will be a division manager level employee within the City’s organizational hierarchy and report directly to the Community Development Director. 2. The new employee will serve as lead City staff member for the Foundation and will coordinate all City support services to and for the Foundation, including administrative and fiscal management services. 3. The Foundation will provide fiscal support to the City for this new position that will phase out as the City has time to establish new revenue stream(s) to support the new position into the future. 4. The City will designate the Foundation to act as the official policy advisory body to the City Council/Housing & Redevelopment Authority for all housing related issues in the City. The Council/HRA will meet jointly with the Foundation on a quarterly basis to facilitate the relationship and mission. 5. The Foundation and the City will agree to jointly create, adopt and implement a community housing strategy. I envision the essential duties of the new employee position as follows: • Serve as the primary housing policy advisor to the City Council/HRA and Housing Foundation • Facilitate all City staff services to the Housing Foundation • Represent the City to federal, state, regional and county government on housing related issues • Represent the City to builders, developers, lenders, NGOs and other housing sector organizations • Monitor state and federal affordable housing legislation • Manage the City’s affordable housing administrative, contractual and compliance obligations and responsibilities • Manage the City’s Affordable Housing Fund, Southdale II TIF District and future Affordable Housing TIF Districts I’m thinking the minimum desired qualifications: • Bachelor’s degree or higher; ability read, write, talk, etc. • Experience with the creation of affordable housing • Public engagement and speaking experience • Previous experience with LIHTC, TIF and other affordable housing finance tools • Legislative or policy development experience • Demonstrated knowledge and understanding of the housing sector The financial pro forma of this proposal looks like this: Proposed Budget • Personnel Costs $119,400 • Operating costs $20,000 • Capital Setup $ 8,000 • Other $ 2,000 TOTAL $149,400 STAFF REPORT Page 3 *For the purposes of this proposal, I applied an annual cost inflator of 4% to each year going forward. To create this new position and to make meaningful, persistent progress toward our affordable housing goals, the City will need the financial support of the Housing Foundation. The City’s budget position for 2018 and 2019 does not allow for the City to unilaterally fund this position. However, the City could phase in its fiscal support over a five-year time frame. If we, City and HF, want to get started on this new affordable housing initiative right now, I propose the following cost sharing formula: Year Budget Cost Share HF City 2018 149,400 90/10 134,000 14,940 2019 155,376 80/20 124,300 31,075 2020 161,591 50/50 80,795 80,795 2021 168,054 50/50 84,027 84,027 2022 174,776 20/80 34,995 139,920 2023> 181,767 10/90 18,176 163,590 476,693 514,347 The proposed cost share over five-year introductory period is 48% HF and 52% City. The cost sharing proposal recognizes that the City needs HF’s help in 2018 and 2019 because our budget is set for those two years, but reflects the fact that the City can plan to absorb a larger share of the costs in 2020, 2021 and beyond. The Housing Foundation has reviewed the proposal and the attached "Third Amendment" and unanimously approved the agreement. 196998v1 1 THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION AGREEMENT made this _______ day of ___________, 2018 by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("Edina") and the East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ("Foundation"), collectively “the Parties.” WHEREAS, Edina and Foundation are parties to an Agreement dated December 1, 1985, as amended by a First Amendment dated August 19, 2009 and a Second Amendment dated January 25, 2011 (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the Parties want to amend the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Amendment. The Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, except as amended by this Third Amendment. 2. Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is amended to provide as follows: This Agreement shall commence on December 4, 1985 and shall continue until December 31, 2024, and shall continue thereafter on a year-to-year basis unless and until terminated by either party hereto by notice given to the other party on or before June 1 of any year, and this Agreement shall then terminate at the end of the calendar year in which such notice is given. 3. Paragraph 3a of the Agreement is amended to provide as follows: The Foundation shall pay Edina for money due Edina under the Agreement. Such payments shall be made annually, following receipt of an invoice from the City, by February of the year following the year in which the payment accrued. 4. The City will hire an Affordable Housing Manager. The Affordable Housing Manager will be a full-time City employee devoted to affordable housing issues in Edina. The 196998v1 2 City reserves the right not to fill the position and to terminate the position at any time. The Affordable Housing Manager will be the primary City liaison with the Foundation. The Foundation will reimburse the City for a portion of the costs the City incurs related to the Affordable Housing Manager Position, not paid for by a grant or TIF funds, including personnel costs, operating costs, capital setup and other related costs. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Agreement, the reimbursements made by the Foundation to the City will also reimburse the City for all services provided to the Foundation by the City. The Foundation will reimburse the City the following cost percentages subject to the not to exceed amounts: 2018 – 90% of costs, not to exceed $134,000 2019 – 80% of costs, not to exceed $124,300 2020 – 50% of costs, not to exceed $80,795 2021 – 50% of costs, not to exceed $$84,027 2022 – 20% of costs, not to exceed $34,995 2023 and thereafter - 10% of the costs, not to exceed $18,176. 5. The Foundation is designated as an official policy advisory body for the City and the City’s Housing and Redevelopment Authority for all housing related issues. 6. The Foundation and the City will jointly create, adopt and implement a community housing strategy. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION BY: ________________________________ BY: ________________________________ James Hovland, Its Mayor ____________________ and_________________________________ and_________________________________ Scott Neal, Its City Manager ____________________ Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-36: Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion adopting Resolution No. 2018-?. INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-36 Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2018-36 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation: Edina Art Center David Kelser Paint Art Supplies Parks & Recreation: Centennial Lakes Edina Community Foundation $15,792.50 Arneson Acres Memory Garden Renovation Design Edina Garden Council $9,280.00 Arneson Acres Memory Garden Renovation Design Dated: April 17, 2018 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Sharon Allison, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondence Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached are correspondences received since the last City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondences City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council David and Sheri Peterson 6121 Arctic Way Edina Minnesota 55436 9529390445 no dashes or spaces sherimotz@aol.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Dear Mayor and Edina City Council, Regarding the proposed development of the Former Public Works Site, we implore you to not build a 17 story apartment building. The Grandview area is residential in character, with thriving businesses that have maintained a neighborly low profile. Such a tall building would be out of place and an eyesore for our community. More importantly, the high traffic and congestion that would be created by the proposed plan in its entirety boggles one's mind and would have distressing long term effects on our community. Not only does the proposal include the 17 story apartment building, but also a 3 story affordable housing 'artist lofts' building, another building with 20,000- 30,000 square feet (for the relocated Edina Art Center and maybe an active adult center) and also underground parking ramps with a public park on top. Too many disparate groups using the roads and the parking us too small a space! Pentagon Park for tall buildings! Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council donna callender 5415 Countryside Rd Edina MN 55436 9529209344 no dashes or spaces merlin1954@aol.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Mr. Hovland, Mr. Stewart, Mr. Fischer, Mr. Staunton, Ms. Brindle: Which council members went to Washington DC on official business last month? What meetings were attended by each member, including what was learned and specific examples of how it would benefit the people of Edina? Also, which officials brought family members with them? Thank you. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Laura Keegan-Plaetzer 4058 Sunnyside Road Edina MN 55424 6129404804 no dashes or spaces laura@plaetzer.us Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. The sketch at 4500 France shows a garage door opening on Sunnyside to allow cars in and out. This is so potentially dangerous for the number of bikers, especially little kids on bikes, walkers and walkers with dogs and even car traffic. There is a constant flow of people all day long on every nice day engaged in various activities on Sunnyside. Seeing people constantly on our street is what makes living here so charming and friendly. Sunnyside is the epitome of a living street, (isn't that an Edina goal?). You can't buy or build charm--it is created by the people that live here. That charm is worth saving and needs to be acknowledged in any plans for redevelopment. Morningside, White Oaks and CC are neighborhoods worth preserving. Any redevelopment needs to acknowledge the adjoining neighborhoods. My hope is that the City Council acknowledges how Sunnyside is actually used by the residents, respects height issues, and makes Ted Carlson eliminate the garage door on Sunnyside. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Mary Kay Reistad 4055 Sunnyside Road Edina MN 55424 6122722230 no dashes or spaces mkreistad@me.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. Re: France/Sunnyside Proposed Apt. Sketch The contemporary design of the developer’s sketch for France/Sunnyside completely contradicts the proposed SAP and completely contradicts the aesthetic of the neighborhood. “If one were to compare the two sides of France Avenue, the Edina side would be identified as more historic based on its buildings and more streetcar-oriented and village-like in terms of physical form…” … “It is the intent of this plan to recognize and preserve the unique history and culture of the study area.” The current sketch disregards the outlined objectives and sets the wrong precedent for the rest of the area. This neighborhood deserves to have a building with an historic appearance that preserves the character of the area. The four-story height on much of Sunnyside exceeds the SAP and is a glaring design flaw so close to single family homes. The garage door on Sunnyside will pour hundreds of added cars into an already very dangerous, busy node. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Ross Plaetzer 4058 Sunnyside Road Edina MN 55424 6129918896 no dashes or spaces ross@plaetzer.us Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. My concerns re: 4500 France 1. The garage door on Sunnyside clearly is dangerous to the many walker, bikers and cars and needs to be eliminated. 2. Impossible turning radius right turn on France. Needs no right turn 3. A 5000 square foot popular restaurant in that location would have 200 seats generating at least 130 cars per night with guests and staff. Where are they all going to park? This could significantly impact the neighborhood in a negative way. 3. This is a lot of development on a small 1 acre lot. The project was first presented as being neighborhood friendly. That was lost by the scale, the garage door on Sunnyside and the lack of sidewalk space on Sunnyside. What is left is a huge brick wall with a unsightly garage door that creates a potentially dangerous hazard for the vast amount of people traffic on Sunnyside. Sunnyside is a living street in an historic neighborhood with lots of charm, bikes, walkers-this needs to be acknowledge preserved as such. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Susan Peterson 4060 Sunnyside Road Edina MN 55424 9522015569 no dashes or spaces dsklpeterson@gmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. 4500 France Avenue 1.The building’s modern, industrial design is oblivious to its surroundings. It's a generic design seen all around Twin Cities suburbs striving to look hip – think Apple Valley. The stretch along Sunnyside is a dead brick wall interrupted by an entrance for a parking garage, which itself is a traffic/safety hazard. 2. The four-story height on a good portion of Sunnyside exceeds what is called for in the SAP and creates a fortress-like edifice facing and close to single-family homes. The developer says he has downsized the project, but that only means his plans were too grandiose to begin with. He says he can only make money with a project this size, but it's not our job to bail him out. Perhaps he should have negotiated better purchase prices for the property. 3. The two-story section closest to the neighborhood is a cheap- looking, boxy appendage. It looks like it was tacked on as an afterthought.Think about what that "park" will look like in the winter. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png MINUTES Community Health Commission January 8, 2018 at 6:30 PM City Hall, Community Room I. Call To Order II. Roll Call Present: Britta Orr, Alison Pence, Amanda Herr, Andrew Johnson-Cowley, Steve Sarles, Marnie Pardo. Edina Transportation Commission Members: Aboubekrine Kane and Lori Richman. Absent: Greg Wright, Christy Zilka, Connie Weston, Om Jahagirdar III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Item 6.B. removed from Agenda. Motion by Alison Pence to Approve Meeting Agenda. Seconded by Steve Sarles. Motion Carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Andrew Johnson-Cowley to Approve December 11, 2017 Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Alison Pence. Motion Carried. A. December 11, 2017 Draft Minutes V. Community Comment VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Comprehensive Plan Review - Transportation Presentation by Commission Member Andrew Johnson-Cowley and group discussion of Transportation chapter in 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Sections 7-3 – 7-15: Current conditions within the city of Edina •Of note – nothing in the vehicular or transit portion of the report discuss the health attributes of transportation at all. •Pedestrian facilities discusses the future sidewalk strategies and improvements. •In 2006, the BETF received a grant from BCBS and prepared a report – Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan Sections 7-15 – 7-38: Trends and Challenges •Sidewalks and paths provide for safe movement of individuals and encourages active lifestyles. •Identification of current conditions and problem areas within the city •Provide a vision for system-wide improvements •Guiding principle for the vision of bicycles within the city related to health is to promote it to improve community health – no specifics were given. •TDM – Transportation Demand Management •Requirements for TDM in any redevelopment proposal – more “teeth” •As Edina ages, the demand for transit services will increase •Focus on vehicular use is discussed. Recommendations: •Include strategies for transportation needs in the underserved/elderly population as they relate to community health (food, exercise, safety) •Increase visibility of strategies to encourage walking and bicycling as HEALTHY alternatives to driving. •Increase support facilities for walkers and bicyclers – water, directions, distance markers, sidewalks, bicycle lanes, etc. •Recognize that lighting is an important aspect to a transportation plan as a way to provide security and safety for walkers and bicyclers. •Require a health assessment to major redevelopment areas to include benefits of the redevelopment plan to community health strategies Discussion with ETC members regarding focus on Health and Transportation coordination. Commissions will work with one another in future to incorporate Health-in-all-Policies concepts into transportation planning and design. B.Comprehensive Plan Chapter Review - Energy and Environment Removed from Agenda VII.Chair And Member Comments VIII.Staff Comments IX.Adjournment Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: B.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission March 13, 2018 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission March 13, 2018 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/10/2018 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Edina Parks & Recreation Commission Braemar Arena Tuesday, March 13, 2018 7 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Good called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Good, Dahlien, Ites, McAwley, Nelson, Strother and Student Members Kiely and Schieffert. Commissioner Miller arrived at 7:05 p.m. Commissioner Burke arrived at 7:10 p.m. Commissioner Willette arrived at 7:50 p.m. Absent was Commissioner McCormick Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton and General Manager Braemar Arena/Sports Dome Chad Eischens III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Nelson to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Strother. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Dahlien to approve the Feb. 13, 2018 minutes. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. V. Community Comment None VI. Special Recognitions and Presentations Chair Good introduced the new Parks & Recreation Commissioner Rick Ites. Commissioner Ites took a few minutes to introduce himself to the commission. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Braemar Arena Tour Chad Eischens, General Manager of Braemar Arena and Sports Dome, gave the commission a tour of Braemar Arena and Sports Dome. Commissioners asked questions throughout the tour and after. B. Comprehensive Plan Update Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/10/2018 Chair Good introduced Planning Commissioner Todd Thorsen. The Parks & Recreation Commission will provide their section of the Comprehensive Plan to the Planning Commission and from there it will go to the City Council. Chair Good went over the fourth iteration of the Comprehensive Plan and shared the changes that were made from inputs he received last month. He added that the input he recently received from Commissioner McCormick will be included in the fifth iteration. Chair Good then reviewed the structure. Commissioners asked questions and gave input. Chair Good noted their next large goal is to review their section of the Comprehensive Plan with the Planning Commission on April 11. Planning Commissioner Thorsen added that at some point it will be handed off to the consultant to put it all together. C. Annual City Council Joint Work Session Prep Chair Good informed the commission the Annual City Council Joint Work Session will be held on Tuesday, April 3 at 6:15 p.m. Chair Good asked the commissioners for their input and insights on what they would like to discuss with the City Council during their joint work session. The following items were discussed: • Arden Park – Update • Braemar Comp Plan – Next steps • Fred Richards Park – Update • Funding for the Future – Consideration of exploring alternative funding sources for parks Chair Good asked each of the commissioners what their first and second priorities would be. It was noted Arden Park was the most popular followed closely by the Braemar Comp Plan. D. 2018 Work Plan Update Updates were given for the following 2018 Work Plan initiatives: • Arden Park Natural Resource Plan – Staff Liaison Kattreh has been working with the Arden Park Neighborhood Association to find a shelter Building/Playground Committee. They also need to start talking about the large number of ash trees on the property because at some point they will be impacted with Emerald Ash borer. A big decision will need to be made regarding how aggressive hey want to be in a plan to remove and replace ash trees. It was also noted to add Commissioners Ites and Nelson to this initiative. • Weber Woods – There was no update; this initiative will probably not happen this year. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/10/2018 • Study and Report for Field, Court and Rink Capacity and Utilization – Chair Good noted this initiative should be started in the next 30 days. It was noted to add Commissioner Burke to this initiative. • Comprehensive Plan – Everything is going good. • More Clearly Define Formal Relationship between the City and the John Philip Sousa Band – Commissioners Miller and Kiely will be meeting with Scott Neal and Scott Crosbie in the next week to hear both sides. There should be more information in the near future. VIII. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioner Dahlien asked if there is a master calendar indicting when and what tournaments are being held at the various facilities. Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus indicated there is not one master calendar for all of the facilities. The best place to find that type of information would be on the website in the calendar section of each of the facilities. • Chair Good formally thanked Mr. Eichsens for hosting tonight’s Parks & Recreation Commission meeting and giving them a tour; it is nice to see what is happening at Braemar Arena and Sports Dome. • Chair Good formally thanked Planning Commissioner Thorsen for representing the Planning Commission and attending tonight’s Parks & Recreation Commission meeting and appreciates the insights he gave the commission on their Comprehensive Plan. • Chair Good recognized and congratulated the Edina High School Girl’s Hockey team for taking first place in the Minnesota State High School Girl’s Hockey Tournament and the Edina High School Boys Hockey team for taking third place in the Minnesota State High School Boy’s Hockey Tournament. • Chair Good indicated he recently saw some discussion on social media regarding heavy use and possible safety issues at the sports dome on Family Night (which is held on Saturday nights from 6:30 – 8:30 p.m.). Commissioner Dahlien indicated he was at that Family Night and there were all kinds of team events going on, balls flying all over and men playing football and baseball. He noted the two staff members behind the desk didn’t go into the facility at all which was a little concerning since there was a little bit of policing that needed to be done. Commissioner Dahlien suggested some parameters be set around what is Family Night. Chair Good commented the general premise seemed to be what exactly is family night; is it really just an open dome or is it intended to designate some specific types of activity. IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh gave the following updates: Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 4/10/2018 • On March 21 the annual Chair and Vice Chair liaison meeting will take place at 6 p.m. • The Board and Commission Annual Recognition event that will take place on April 16 at 5:30 p.m. at Braemar Golf Course; commissioners will be receiving an invitation to this event. • Three of the four restaurants who submitted Request for Proposals for the Braemar Golf Course restaurant were interviewed. The interview team was unanimous in their choice of Red River Kitchen. The hope is to have the lease ready to present to the City Council at their second meeting in April. • Tom Swenson, Maintenance Superintendent of Braemar Golf Course, has been hired to be the new Assistant Director of Parks & Natural Resources. He will work both positions until his current position at Braemar Golf Course is filled. • Staff Liaison Kattreh today met with the Executive Director of People for Parks; one of the fundraising arms for the Minneapolis Park Board to discuss fundraising opportunities in Edina. If the commission is looking to add an additional initiative to their Work Plan this may be something to look into. X. Adjournment Motion made by McAwley to adjourn the March 13, 2018 meeting at 8:45 p.m. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. Date: April 17, 2018 Agenda Item #: XII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Meetings and Events as of April 17, 2018 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Schedule of Meetings & Events as of April 17, 2018 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF APRIL 17, 2018 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Mon Apr 16 Annual Meeting of Boards and Commissions 5:00 – 7:30 P.M. BRAEMAR CLUB HOUSE Tues Apr 17 Work Session: Race and Equity Check In 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Sat Apr 21 Town Hall Meeting 10:00 A.M.-Noon BRAEMAR CLUB HOUSE Thur April 26 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 1 Work Session: Comp Plan Update, Southdale 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur May 10 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues May 15 Work Session: CRBBS Asset Management Public Works 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting: Energy & Environment Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur May 24 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon May 28 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues June 5 Joint Meeting: Transportation Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting: Community Health Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur June 14 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues June19 Joint Meeting: Hyman Rights & Relations Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session: City Enterprises 6:15 P.M., COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur June 28 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed July 4 Edina’s Fourth of July Parade – Starts behind Edina City Hall 10:00 A,M, Thur July 12 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 17 Work Session: 50th & France 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Capital Improvement Plan 2019-2023 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues July 31 City Council Candidate Filing Opens 8;00 A.M. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE