The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-05-15 City Council Regular Meeting PacketAgenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota City Cou n cil Cham be rs Tuesday, May 15, 2018 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment A.Mohammed Rasulberbiev, Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting. V.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All a genda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be remov ed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session of May 1, 2018 and Regular Meeting of May 1, 2018 B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre List Dated 04/26/2018 TOTAL: $891,547.72 And Pre-List Dated 05/03/2018 TOTAL: $2,153,240.29 And Credit Card Transactions 02/27/2018- 03/26/2018 TOTAL: $56,950.03 C.Request For Purchase: 2018 Ford F150 with Ecoboost Engine D.Request for Purchase: SCADA PLC and Panel View Upgrades E.Request for Purchase: Engineering Services for Lift Station #6 F.Resolution No. 2018-46: Approve Quit Claim Deed with Southdale OEce Partners, LLC. G.Approve TraEc Safety Report of April 3, 2018 H.Resolution No. 2018-44: Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Agreement I.Community Health Commission Appointment J.2018 City Council Meeting Schedule Change K.Contract Addendum: Mid America Golf and Landscape L.Braemar Lease Agreement Approval: Red River Kitchen VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Edina Girls Hockey Team 2018 State Champions Recognition B.Proclamation: 2018 EMS Week C.Proclamation: 2018 National Police Week Proclamation D.Proclamation: Preservation Month May 2018 and 2018 Edina Heritage Award E.Proclamation: 2018 National Public Works Week F.Race & Equity Final Report & Recommendations VII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eEcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.Ordinance No. 2018-09, Resolution Nos. 2018-47 & 2018-48; Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan for France Equities LLC, 7250 France Avenue VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Arden Park Sixty Percent Design Check-In B.Resolution No. 2018-43: Accepting Various Grants & Donations IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence B.Correspondence C.Minutes 1.Minutes: Parks & Recreation Commission April 10, 2018 D.Advisory Communication 1.Advisory Communication: Parks & Recreation Commission- Additional Work Plan Item - Explore Alternative Funding Model(s) X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor And Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments A.2018 Q1 Quarterly Business Report B.2017 Preliminary Year End Financial Report XIII.Schedule of Meetings and Events as of May 15, 2018 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampliNc ation, an interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861 72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: O ther F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk Item Activity: Subject:Mohammed R asulberbiev, C ommunity C omment C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ubmittal during C ommunity Comment AT TAC HME N T S: Description Mohammed Rasulberbiew Submittal During Community Comment Why the City should give me the preference to buy the plot on 7500 Xerxes Ave South 1 November 2017 — I discovered the plot of land. 2. December 2017 — My numerous discovery calls and emails with the City of Edina triggered the City to review the plot, eventually, confirming that the City owns this land, which it had not previously known about and therefore was not collecting any property taxes. 3. Mid-December 2017 — Attended the City Council meeting to inquire further about the land and the next steps to acquire it. 4. In conversations with Scott Neil right after the council meeting, Scott shared that the City would go through the steps of assessing the land and putting it up for sale. In the same discussion Scott confirmed that — since I am an eager and ready buyer — the City would take a passive approach, giving me the first opportunity to make an offer for that land. I am asking for the City Council to present me with that opportunity to buy the plot since it was me who brought this land to your attention. 5. After persistent semi-monthly follow ups with Emily since January, learned that the lot, RID # 3202824310002, will be finally placed on MLS for sale, some time the week of May 14th. 6. I would like to make the City an offer for the assessed value and I would like the City to accept the offer. Why this plot is important to me My simple goal for the plot is to build a single-family home and raise my family in the City of Edina. My brother moved to the City of Edina in 2016 (picture attached). He has two young kids. We've just had our first kid (attached picture). I would really like these kids to grow up together. This plot of land is, literally, a half of block away, which would truly enable for our two families to help each other, provide emotional support, create a strong family bond and be part of the community. We always have been good citizens and good members of the community, who pays their taxes on time. In fact, I have helped the City to discover this land, which would bring in new sustainable tax revenue. In my opinion, as a good citizen, I deserve the opportunity to purchase the land first. Thank you for your consideration. Muhammad Rasulberdiev Rasulberdievgmail.com 612-598-2839 :11:111r, "It:4:4.11 Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: Minutes F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes : Work S es s ion of May 1, 2018 and R egular Meeting of May 1, 2018 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve M inutes as presented. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft May 1, 2018 Work Session Minutes Draft May 1, 2018 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2018 5:30 P.M. Mayor Jim Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Brindle, Stewart and Mayor Hovland. Members Fischer and Staunton entered the meeting at 5:40 p.m. Edina City staff attending the meeting were: Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator; Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Chante Mitchell, City Management Fellow; Scott Neal, City Manager; Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager; Cary Teague, Community Development Director; and Don Uram, Finance Director. City Consultants in attendance included: Katie Clark Sieben, Mic Johnson, AFO; and Terry Minarik, Confluence GRANDVIEW GREEN: UPDATED CONCEPT FOR FREEWAY LID OVER HIGHWAY 100 Economic Development Manager Neuendorf reminded the Council the concept of building a "freeway lid" over a portion of Highway 100 has been further explored for several years. The new structure above the highway lanes would be used as a new public park. The land next to the park would be used for new development - a combination of residential, commercial and civic uses. Mr. Neuendorf explained the work done to date: • City staff and representatives have met with MnDOT officials to explore this concept, • Outside planning and development experts have been engaged, • Preliminary engineering studies have been prepared, • Input has been collected from Boards and Commissions • Public open houses have been held to gather input. He introduced the team that would be presenting the findings to date on the Grandview Green concept of a freeway lid over Highway 100. Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Katie Clark Sieben, Project Consultant; and Terry Minarik, Confluence. Project Consultant Sieben began the presentation giving a brief history of steps taken from 2017-2018 that led to the current concept. Mr. Neuendorf, Mr. Millner, Ms. Brown, Mr. Minarik and Mr. Johnson all participated in the presentation. The presentation included: Grandview Green history (including Grandview District Guiding Principles), concept update (mission, vision, and parcels), brief review of technical studies (market research study, property research, transportation study, sanitary sewer study, water main study, storm sewer study, and sustainability study); update on proposed legislation, and a preliminary financial assessment. Staff and the Council discussed the next steps including; the Vision and Mission Statement of the proposed Grandview Green, housing density and green space, should the City enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with MnDOT regarding Highway 100 airspace use and lease negotiations, should the project be included in the updated Comprehensive Plan, should any development be phased and what would be the financial model supporting the project. Council directed staff to proceed with accumulating further data, continue gathering public input, to pursue the MOU with MnDOT and begin lease negotiations. Work Session Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2018 2 ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, _____________________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, May 15, 2018. _____________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 1, 2018 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Staunton, Stewart and Mayor Hovland. Member Fischer was absent. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS AMENDED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, amending the agenda to add Item VI.D., Proclamation for Palmer Rockswold Day. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT IV.A. MANOR HOMES OF EDINA COMPLAINT PETITION – RECEIVED Bruce Botten, 6940 Langford Drive, shared a petition from property owners affected by Loden Apartments and commented on decreased resale value, increased taxes, harsh lighting, speed concerns, noise from the amenity area, and impacts from dog park location. Fredrick Allen Constantini, 6942 Langford Drive, shared his disappointment regarding the dog park location that would result in odor and noise concerns. The Council stated they would meet with the developer to review the neighbor’s concerns. IV.B. CREEK KNOLL NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER – RECEIVED Tim O’Neil, 3537 W. Fuller Street, presented a petition requesting new streets, curb, and gutter. He shared that work was originally scheduled for 2019 and noted St. Peter’s Church was planning a campaign for their new parking area and would like to do it in conjunction with street improvements to correct water flow and erosion issues. Danny Rohloff, 3525 W. Fuller Street, shared concerns about resident safety, washouts, property damage, and environmental impact to Minnehaha Creek and requested the Council consider the street surfacing project. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Brindle a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving the consent agenda as follows: V.A. Approve minutes of April 17, 2018, Work Session meeting and April 17, 2018, Regular Council meeting, and April 21, 2018, Town Hall Meeting V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on pre-list dated April 12, 2018, and consisting of 35 pages: General Fund $160,546.28, Conservation & Sustainability $17,297.05, Working Capital Fund $49,083.92, Equipment Replacement Fund $5,797.08, Art Center Fund $5,090.74, Golf Dome Fund $2,399.27, Aquatic Center Fund $848.77, Golf Course Fund $14,876.81, Ice Arena Fund $24,442.42, Sports Dome Fund $30,023.74, Edinborough Park Fund $17,415.41, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,555.41, Liquor Fund $135,451.70, Utility Fund $549,650.44, Storm Sewer Fund Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2018 Page 2 $12,610.67, Recycling Fund $39,321.72, PSTF Agency Fund $3,984.06, HRA Administration $1,600.00, Centennial TIF District $30,505.77: Total $1,106,501.26; and per pre-list dated April 19, 2018, consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $221,780.60, Police Special Revenue $12,571.49, Conservation & Sustainability $1,723.38, Working Capital Fund $5,153.49, Equipment Replacement Fund $37,758.00, Art Center Fund $973.78, Golf Dome Fund $632.68, Aquatic Center Fund $259.09, Golf Course Fund $13,293.33, Ice Arena Fund $9,411.40, Sports Dome Fund $50.95, Edinborough Park Fund $15,666.11, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $5,774.29, Liquor Fund $171,948.34, Utility Fund $133,530.96, Storm Sewer Fund $786.45, Risk Mgmt ISF $4,759.55, PSTF Agency Fund $7,486.81, Centennial TIF District $52,059.22, Payroll Fund $11,832.76, Total $707,452,68; and credit card transactions dated January 26, 2018-February 26, 2018, and consisting of 15 pages: General Fund $27,406.83, Police Special Revenue $139.00, Arts and Culture Fund $38.22, PIR Construction Fund $800.00, Equipment Replacement Fund $290.00, Art Center Fund $765.85, Golf Dome Fund $132.69, Golf Course Fund $5,569.90, Ice Arena Fund $1,160.49, Sports Dome Fund $358.06-, Park Fund $87.83, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,694.12, Liquor Fund $717.27, Utility Fund $709.00, PSTF Agency Fund $1,424.18, Mn Task Force 1 Fund $440.14, Centennial TIF District $50.00: Total $41,067.46 V.C. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Avolve Software Corporation, ProjectDox Upgrade, $31,747.00 V.D. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidders, CS McCrossan, Bituminous Roadways, Cemstone, DPC, Hawkins and ESS as outlined in the 2018 Commodities Tabulation V.E. Approve Pilot Dockless Bike Sharing Program V.F. Approve Extension of Final Site Plan Approval for the Millennium Project at 3250 66th Street West and 6550 Xerxes Avenue V.G. Adopt Resolution No. 2018-45 Providing for the Sale of $5,780,000 General Obligation Bonds Series 2018A Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI.A. EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND MIKE SIITARI OFFICER OF THE YEAR: BRIAN HUBBARD – RECOGNIZED Police Chief Nelson presented the Edina Crime Prevention Fund Mike Siitari Officer of the Year Award to Officer Brian Hubbard. He shared Officer Hubbard’s background and said he built many positive relationships through Beyond the Badge, Citizens Academy, School Liaison Officer, DARE, Special Olympics, Neighborhood Officer Engagement Program, Night to Unite, and Law Enforcement Memorial. Chief Nelson shared a clip featuring Officer Hubbard that raised awareness for the Minnesota Law Enforcement Council and recognized members of the Crime Prevention Board. Officer Hubbard thanked his wife, children, family, friends, Chief Nelson, City administration, Police staff, Fire Department, and the community for their support and said it was an honor to serve the residents and his fellow officers. A round of applause was offered by the audience and the Council thanked Officer Hubbard. VI.B. THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT UPDATE: JOHN GUNYOU – PRESENTED Three Rivers Park District Board Chair John Gunyou shared the mission of the Three Rivers Park District, noted they served 11 million visitors each year and protected quality of life through environmental education. He explained the Mississippi Gateway Regional Park was a joint development with Brooklyn Park and would be a gateway as an environmental education center and outlined other park partnerships with Sochacki Park, Taft, MAC Nature Center, Centennial Park, and Schaper Park that provided access and programs to first Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2018 Page 3 tier suburbs and expanded trail connections. He explained community engagement efforts that engaged populations and geographic areas that have not used the parks through programs such as Parks on the Go, Explorer Camps, and others. The Council offered assistance with north/south trail connections, said the scope of the Three Rivers Park District was impressive, and encouraged the community to explore and take advantage of this amazing resource. Chair Gunyou commented on the Crosstown Bridge cost of $25 million and said half was funded through Federal funds and half through District funds. The Council inquired about maintenance costs to fulfil usage and Mr. Gunyou said costs were based on classification and a joint project with surrounding cities. The Council commended staff on their problem solving and how they balanced the concerns of the neighbors and shared comments regarding the trail project, noting it was a good learning experience. VI.C. KIDS TO PARKS DAY MAY 19, 2018 – PROCLAIMED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to declare May 19, 2018, as Kids to Parks Day. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D. PALMER ROCKSWOLD DAY APRIL 30, 2018 – PROCLAIMED The Council shared a photo and history of Mr. Rockswold and his family and congratulated him on his 102nd birthday on April 30. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to declare April 30, 2018 as Palmer Rockswold Day. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS – (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted). VII.A. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING – APPROVED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf said for the past several months, City representatives had been meeting with MnDOT staff to discuss how the two agencies could work together on local improvements to the Highway 100 interchanges at Vernon Avenue / 50th Street and Eden Avenue and explored the potential construction of a "freeway lid" over a portion of the highway. He said MnDOT officials were open to exploring this concept further and recommended entering into the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to clarify the working relationship and mutually agreed-upon intentions. Mr. Neuendorf noted the MOU had been co-written by MnDOT and City representatives, reviewed by the City Attorney, and would serve as a non-binding document that solidified the preliminary partnership. The Council asked questions regarding shared goals and suggested the combination of Items 3.9 and 3.10 as they both related to increased economic productivity of City and State land. Mr. Neuendorf explained MnDOT would retain ownership of the land, while the City was interested in air rights. The project would not be constructed on the highway but above it. He noted City Hall parking lot was included as a City parcel. The Council shared how they would build on the community comments and planned public input and noted while this was a non-binding MOU, it reflected the City’s goals and purposes. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve the Minnesota Department of Transportation Memorandum of Understanding to continue the planning, Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2018 Page 4 construction, maintenance and usage of a highway cover over Highway 100, and utilization of state public lands in Edina. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VII.B. RESOLUTION 2018-42 ADOPTED – ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS – ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-42 accepting various grants and donations. Member Staunton seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. VIII.B. MINUTES 1. ENERGRY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION, MARCH 8, 2018 2. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION, MARCH 13, 2018 3. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION, FEBRUARY 27, 2018 4. PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 28, 2018 Informational; no action required. IX. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XI. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XI.A. HRA STANDING MEETING SCHEDULE Mr. Neal shared input on the current HRA meeting schedule. After discussion, Council consensus was to continue the meeting schedule as proposed. XII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF MAY 1, 2018 – Received XIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, May 15, 2018. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the May 1, 2018, meeting available. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.B. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: C laims F rom:Don Uram, F inance Director Item Activity: Subject:R eceive P ayment of C laims As P er: P re List Dated 04/26/2018 TO TAL: $891,547.72 And P re-List Dated 05/03/2018 TO TAL: $2,153,240.29 And C redit C ard Transac tions 02/27/2018-03/26/2018 TO TAL: $56,950.03 Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve claims for payment. I N TR O D U C TI O N: C laim information for approval is attached. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 04/26/2018 TOTAL $891,547.72 Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 05/03/2018 TOTAL $2,153,240.29 Credit Card Transactions 02/27/2018-03/26/2018 TOTAL $56,950.03 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 - 4/26/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6334 4/26/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 51.51 458443 2223023 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 80.96 458516 2224421 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 113.99 458760 2225638 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.99 458781 2225645 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 323.45 6335 4/26/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 81.55 458517 63074600 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 123.55 458446 63550100 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 266.65 458445 63604200 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,971.60 458941 63702600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,372.16 458782 63813000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.55 458767 63813200 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 113.55 458779 63813300 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,810.77 458775 63813400 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 162.76 458444 97422400 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 136.83 458780 97488900 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 70.32 458788 97489000 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,195.29 6336 4/26/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 41.73 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 458888 138401 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 41.73 6337 4/26/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 117.60 POSTIT/CORRTAPE/ERASER/PADS 458968 OE-478468-1 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 70.36 SUPPLIES 458985 WO-377132-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.37 SUPPLIES 458984 WO-377133-1 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 236.33 6338 4/26/2018 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 35,430.57 LEGAL BILL 458942 2851-DOUG 133 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 35,430.57 6339 4/26/2018 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 352.50 SUPPLIES FOR OCE 458962 902695000 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 352.50 6340 4/26/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 215.00 458937 67-3841 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6340 6341 4/26/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 104020 DALCO Continued-. 4/26/2018 215.00 718.40 CITY HALL SOAP 458840 3306448 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 718.40 6342 4/26/2018 129157 DO-GOOD.BIZ INC 409.29 POST CARD MAIL HOUSE 458933 11122-01 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 504.71 POSTAGE EARLY BIRD POSTCARD 458933 11122-01 5310.6235 POSTAGE POOL ADMINISTRATION 914.00 6343 4/26/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 409.00 458718 588285 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 613.70 458717 588286 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 1,022.70 6344 4/26/2018 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 17.99 SUPPLIES 458721 2649385000 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 17.99 6345 4/26/2018 129508 IMPACT 1,955.34 458917 132129 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 1,955.34 6346 4/26/2018 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 64.86 LEWIS BATH 458908 129786 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 64.86 6347 4/26/2018 100858 LOGIS 721.00 458822 45123 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,734.00 458822 45123 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,961.00 458822 45123 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 4,502.00 458822 45123 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,045.00 458822 45123 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 6,961.00 458822 45123 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 7,269.00 458822 45123 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 7,027.00 458822 45123 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 44.55 IT SUPPLIES 458494 45216 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 36,264.55 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 - 4/26/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Page - 3 Business Unit 6348 4/26/2018 101483 MENARDS Continued-. 130.27 PD BREAKROOM REMODEL 458973 066383 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 88.82 PLANTER REPAIR 458798 66023 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 281.30 POLY POLES FOR OFFICE REMOD 458681 66026 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 31.30 SPONGES, PINEOL, ZEP 458928 66029 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 80.36 PLANTERS 458799 66053 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 63.47 PPE 458720 66229 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 131.50 MAILBOXES 458686 66285 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 80.59 PLANTER 458814 66293 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.20 OFFICE REMODEL SUPPLIES 458853 66353 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 173.99 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL 458865 66364 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 72.16 TIM TOOLS 458914 66366 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 68.94 GENERAL TOOLS 458854 66390 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 23.47 3/4 DIAMOND DRILL BIT 458981 66431 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 107.80 SKATE SHOW SUPPLIES 458995 66694 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 54.11 PD BREAKROOM REMODEL 458974 66710 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 15.78 SOUTH WATER HEARTER REPAIR 458994 66752 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,432.06 6349 4/26/2018 129485 PAPCO INC. 43.26 CLEANING SUPPLIES 458719 206158-1 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 43.26 6350 4/26/2018 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 1,439.70 NORTH RAMP EXPANSION -SITEWRK 458843 73548 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,439.70 6351 4/26/2018 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 56.18 MAYOR'S BUSINESS CARDS 458842 98807 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 102.93 PUBLIC HEARING ENVELOPES 458842 98807 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 160.26 ENVELOPES 458887 99634 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 57.62 ROTTY BUSINESS CARDS 458997 99706 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 376.99 6352 4/26/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 127.50 458440 0203993 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 549.00 458763 0204996 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.50 458758 0204997 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 151.25 458412 204472 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 150.50 458753 204998 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,019.75 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6352 6353 4/26/2018 4/26/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION Continued... 147.61 CONCESSIONS FOOD 458983 51558264 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 147.61 6354 4/26/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,438.85 458482 67883 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 385.00 458743 68539 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 744.30 458744 68546 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 865.15 458519 68547 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,433.30 423972 4/26/2018 100612 A.M. LEONARD 46.51 WORK GLOVES 458489 C118059009 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 46.51 423973 4/26/2018 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 148.00 458466 E-5942 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 148.00 458511 E-5943 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 296.00 423974 4/26/2018 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 110.07 ADT 458919 5813499/4-2018 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 110.07 423975 4/26/2018 141768 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC. 26.40 VALVE 458911 10929510 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.40 423976 4/26/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 38.42 FILTER CARTRIDGE 458827 1CH6-N6V9-9JGV 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 11.42 SUPERHERO SATURDAY 458861 1DQX-GQ36-KL7R 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 138.00 ADAPTORS HCL 458893 1JFC-PXLW-R9XQ 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 20.81 CRAFT SUPPLY 458704 1K7W-VX1L-K7J1 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 42.94 POPCORN SUMMER CAMPS 458701 1P RG-33C3-XGYL 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 44.97 WOOD CARVING CHISEL 458700 1QFL-7Q93-M644 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 90.99 FIBERGLASS 458688 1R37-KYRF-RJMX 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 21.98 ST. 1 SHOWER CURTAINS 458934 1XK6-PJXY-RGCV 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 17.64 MAILING LABELS 458703 1YJP-R4G3-1NCX 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 427.17 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 — Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423976 423977 4/26/2018 4/26/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. Continued... 140.10 458369 1004106542 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 215.53 458895 1004112917 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 355.63 423978 4/26/2018 134924 ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC. 1,719.06 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 458907 95494450 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,719.06 423979 4/26/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,470.00 458793 3254163 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,664.00 458938 3254166 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,952.40 458820 3255826 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,582.20 458759 3255829 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,832.50 458479 3262595 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11,501.10 423980 4/26/2018 142322 BANK OF AMERICA 5,841.84 VEHICLE FORFEITURE PROCEEDS 458550 20180417NM 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 5,841.84 423981 4/26/2018 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 38.95 WAY FIND BATTERY 458924 018-P912249 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 38.95 423982 4/26/2018 127908 BAZILLIONS, THE 250.00 PERFORMER ON MAY 17, 2018 458923 051718 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 250.00 423983 4/26/2018 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 156.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 458829 4748979 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 156.00 423984 4/26/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 40.00 458423 419108 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,505.65 458422 419109 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,348.78 458752 420405 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 906.90 458518 420502 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,801.33 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423984 423985 4/26/2018 4/26/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY Continued... 304.82 CONCESSIONS FOOD 458828 553209 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 304.82 423986 4/26/2018 141961 BHE COMMUNITY SOLAR LLC 5,572.77 458875 8388956 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 5,572.77 423987 4/26/2018 131967 BOLLIG & SONS 2,500.00 5913 GRIMES ESCROW REFUND 458946 161700 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 5933 ST JOHNS - ESCROW REFUND 458957 161886 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 5,000.00 423988 4/26/2018 140149 BORGSTROM, ERIK JON 533.33 458367 E0013 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 533.33 458367 E0013 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 533.34 458367 E0013 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 1,600.00 423989 4/26/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 601.00- 458447 149866 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 601.00- 458447 149866 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 601.00 458447 149866 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 601.00 458447 149866 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 601.00 458447 149866 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,521.00 458939 150020 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 444.50 458520 150136 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 375.50 458768 150141 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,942.00 423990 4/26/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 145.10 458480 1080784449 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 996.21 458431 1080784450 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,792.08 458432 1080784451 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,109:51 458784 1080787658 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 55.72 458514 1080787659 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,134.34 458513 1080787660 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 80.47 458411 1080787661 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,208.25 458410 1080787662 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 - 4/26/2018 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Page- 7 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423990 4/26/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 182.32 458499 1080787663 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,037.78 458408 1080787734A 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 124.60 458500 1080787735 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,656.91 458449 1080787736 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18,523.29 423991 4/26/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 5,183.85 458436 1090842708 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.65 458435 1090842709 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 111.85 458785 1090845502 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 651.93 458475 1090845503 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.56 458476 1090845504 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,565.40 458451 1090845505 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 127.75 458450 1090845506 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13,793.99 423992 4/26/2018 137691 BY THE YARD INC. 2,165.00 PRESS BOX CHAIRS 458698 110527 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,165.00 423993 4/26/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,345.65 458439 2089036 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 135.80 458438 2089837 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,180.20 458463 2092921 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,705.10 458465 2092922 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,316.95 458787 2092923 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 89.40 458789 2092924 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.45- 458464 591-0140 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,749.65 423994 4/26/2018 102496 GEMSTONE CONTRACTOR SUPPLY- VEND #101515 24.00 POLISHING PADS 458491 376325 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 24.00 423995 4/26/2018 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 7,000.00 BRAEMAR ARENA RECOMMISSION 458831 15299 2710.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES CAS ADMINISTRATION 7,000.00 423996 4/26/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 71.72 458882 10089900-04/18 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 423996 4/26/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 9,595.68 458879 10437426-4/18 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,765.08 458884 546504-04/18 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,775.77 458885 5563827-04/18 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 89.18 458878 55661631-04/18 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 99.68 458883 5596524-04/18 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 6,258.51 458870 62040720-04/18 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,092.24 458881 8034001-04/18 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,384.38 458880 9724639-04/18 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 26,132.24 423997 4/26/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 164.65 458877 2951-4/18 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 71.10 RICHFIELD RADIO TOWER CIRCUIT 458693 612E77-0056/4-2 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 018 70.60 458876 6522-4/18 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 429.09 BACKUP NONEMERGENCY LINES 458696 952-920-9996/4- 2310.6188 TELEPHONE E911 2018 735.44 423998 4/26/2018 100683 CHEMSEARCH 657.77 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 458690 3087775 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 657.77 423999 4/26/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 14.44 UNIFORMS 458815 4005199757 1640.6201 LAUNDRY PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 36.26 LAUNDRY 458683 4005199771 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 45.97 UNIFORM RENTAL 458682 4005199772 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19.92 UNIFORM RENTAL 458684 4005199791 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 37.84 UNIFORM RENTAL 458685 4005199804 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 154.43 424000 4/26/2018 129826 CITIZENS LEAGUE 20,000.00 RACE & EQUITY PAYMENT 3 OF 3 458841 PAY #3 1500.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONTINGENCIES 20,000.00 424001 4/26/2018 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 55,217.00 458987 15528 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 55,217.00 424002 4/26/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 - 4/26/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Page- 9 Business Unit 424002 4/26/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Continued-. 741.59 LIBRARY SENIOR CENTER WATER 458897 0203600013-4/18 1653.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 35.57 GRANDVIEW IRRIGATION 458896 0203610011-4/18 1653.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 777.16 424003 4/26/2018 142333 CLOW, KARLA 381.00 DOME CANCEL REIMBURSE 458862 04182018.2 5552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 381.00 424004 4/26/2018 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 420.00 458468 3641205760 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 315.16 458512 3647201820 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 735.16 424005 4/26/2018 120433 COMCAST 42.69 CABLE TV 458691 877210614054037 5553.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 2/4-2018 42.69 424006 4/26/2018 120433 COMCAST 33.93 CABLE TV 458982 877210614037302 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2/4-2018 33.93 424007 4/26/2018 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 39.81 458699 180415 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 39.81 424008 4/26/2018 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 418.80 CONCRETE PINS 30" AND 36" 458493 0167812-IN 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 418.80 424009 4/26/2018 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 220.87 CLAY 458918 INV000124691 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 220.87 424010 4/26/2018 101704 COOK, BARBARA 315.00 ADAPTIVE BOWLING 458958 18-1795 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 315.00 424011 4/26/2018 100012 CORE & MAIN R55CKR2 LOG1S101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 — 4/26/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424011 4/26/2018 100012 CORE & MAIN Continued... 1,470.94 REPAIR PARTS 458833 1729271 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,470.94 424012 4/26/2018 122132 CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC. 648.31 DARE SUPPLIES 458857 113891 1425.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DARE 648.31 424013 4/26/2018 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 1,025.00 MAY NEWSLETTERS 458821 314647 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,025.00 424014 4/26/2018 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 5,066.20 SCADA PROGRAMMING 458733 10861 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 5,066.20 424015 4/26/2018 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 1,614.80 PAMELA 458800 1803-687533 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 348.77- LUMBER RETURN 458816 1803-687686 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,266.03 424016 4/26/2018 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC. 349.50 REMOTE START FOR NEW SQUAD 458825 1-104065 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 349.50 424017 4/26/2018 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 15,524.51 MARCH 2018 SURCHARGE 458591 032018 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 15,524.51 424018 4/26/2018 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 270.00 INSTRUCTOR SHIRTS 458860 62894 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 270.00 424019 4/26/2018 102831 DEXYP 90.31 YELLOW PAGES AD 458689 650487671/4-201 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION 8 90.31 424020 4/26/2018 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL 697.50 LESSONS 4/5-4/18 458900 41819 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 697.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 — Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424020 424021 4/26/2018 4/26/2018 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL 121103 DIRECTV Continued... 101.51 CABLET TV 458729 33977797746 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 101.51 424022 4/26/2018 142325 DR NAIP TUNA 205.41 REFUND 458556 87779 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 205.41 424023 4/26/2018 142339 DRUGGE, CRAIG 724.59 AMB REF 38888154 458864 04202018 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 724.59 424024 4/26/2018 100737 E. H. RENNER & SONS 12,812.73 FINAL PAYMENT FOR REHAB 458834 000160640000-3/ 05570.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS General Rehab - Water 18 12,812.73 424025 4/26/2018 142227 EBSEN, JENNIFER 275.28 REFUND 458551 0120757 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 275.28 424026 4/26/2018 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 575.00 PUB FIN CONSULT 458966 76565 9210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER HRAADMINISTRATION 2,012.50 GRANDVIEW GREEN CONSULT 458965 76578 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,200.00 RATE STUDY UPDATE 458916 76593 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 920.00 5146 EDEN REDEV FIN 458963 76595 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 575.00 AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONSULT 458964 76597 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 5,282.50 424027 4/26/2018 142326 EINERTSON, TOM 86.02 DOME CANCEL REIMBURSMENT 458679 04182018.1 5552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 86.02 424028 4/26/2018 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 855.00 RADAR INSTALL MOTORCYCLE 458678 MOB18019 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 855.00 424029 4/26/2018 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 220.50 458766 8903 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424029 424030 4/26/2018 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 4/26/2018 220.50 88.04 CONNECTORS 458954 1-5555329 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 596.75 BATTERIES 458706 1-Z14186 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.75 BATTERY 458949 69-307813 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 769.54 424031 4/26/2018 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,548.00 LESSONS 4/5-4/18 458899 41918 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,548.00 424032 4/26/2018 142350 FAIRCON SERVICE COMPANY 628.62 WEST FREEZER REPAIR 458993 60024 5520.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA CONCESSIONS 628.62 424033 4/26/2018 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 150.28 NUTS AND BOLTS 458931 MNTC2152057 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 9.95 STRIP 458915 MNTC2152090 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 160.23 424034 4/26/2018 134850 FISHER, DAVID 300.30 MILEAGE 458680 4-12-2018 1495.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE INSPECTIONS 300.30 424035 4/26/2018 102727 FORCE AMERICA 563.88 COUPLER, HARNESS 458705 IN001-1234094 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 563.88 424036 4/26/2018 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 227.70 CONTRACTED SERVICE 458950 01S6339040 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 227.70 424037 4/26/2018 142323 FRIEDRICHS, LAWRENCE 84.92 REFUND 458554 87567 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 84.92 424038 4/26/2018 142024 FSSOLUTIONS 437.25 1ST QUARTER RANDOM DOT 458960 FL00210556 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 437.25 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 - 4/26/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Page - 13 Business Unit 424038 424039 4/26/2018 4/26/2018 142024 FSSOLUTIONS 142334 FURTHER Continued... 905.50 APRIL SELECTACCOUNT INVOICE 458999 008816/4-2018 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 905.50 424040 4/26/2018 141336 GEOGRAPHIC INDUSTRIES INC. 9,990.00 PARK SIGNS 458837 16156 47093.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK SIGNAGE IMPRVMNT PROJECT 9,990.00 424041 4/26/2018 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 210.00 ARTWORK SOLD 458969 042318 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 210.00 424042 4/26/2018 101103 GRAINGER 15.43 TAPE 458797 9757504213 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.54 SCRAPER 458711 9759608269 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.74 SHOVEL 458713 9759608277 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.71 424043 4/26/2018 102202 GRAND VIEW LODGE 156.76 MOORE BCA CONFERENCE HOTEL 458726 R7F597 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 156.76 KUSKE BCA CONFERENCE HOTEL 458725 R7FEF4 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 78.38 WATERSTREET BCA CONF HOTEL 458728 R8031E 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 156.76 SCHULTZ BCA CONFERENCE HOTEL • 458727 R80817 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 548.66 424044 4/26/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 660.50 458441 1713611 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 194.50 458905 MN00038259 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 715.25 458776 MN00038286 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,570.25 424045 4/26/2018 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 387.00 LESSONS 4/5-4/18 458898 41918 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 387.00 424046 4/26/2018 100788 H&L MESABI 981.50 PLOW BLADES 458956 00954 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 981.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424047 4/26/2018 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC Continued... 34.10 ETHERNET CABLE 458855 189693-2 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 156.84 458856 191718-1 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 190.94 424048 4/26/2018 139501 HCT 60.00 LICENSE TABS 458926 042018SW 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.00 424049 4/26/2018 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 28,022.33 MAY HP INVOICE - NONACTIVES 458737 80497198 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 269,592.66 MAY HP INVOICE -ACTIVES 458736 80501860 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 297,614.99 424050 4/26/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,276.38 HENN CO P WORKS RADIO FEE 458694 1000109308 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,276.38 424051 4/26/2018 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 275.80 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 458732 52171829 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 275.80 424052 4/26/2018 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 30.81 ARENA CONF ROOM EQUIP 458722 59858578 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 248.85 SPEAKER BARS FOR SHELF 458731 59859747 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 27.65 SPEAKER BAR FOR NATE 458731 59859747 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 307.31 424053 4/26/2018 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 125.00 PERFORMER ON MAY 3, 2018 458921 050318 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 125.00 424054 4/26/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 859.00 458473 000282 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,962.50 458437 956523 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,319.85 458472 957933 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,227.50 458786 957934 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,368.85 424055 4/26/2018 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 630.45 POOL LIFT BATTERY & BOX 458930 180322018 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424055 4/26/2018 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY Continued... 199.15 HANDSET FOR POOL LIFT 458929 180326019 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 829.60 424056 4/26/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 12.05 FILTERS 458948 038041806 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.56 FILTER 458710 038041857 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.50 OIL SPILL ABSORBANTS 458947 038041878 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.16 SEALS 458952 038042054 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 210.27 424057 4/26/2018 101146 IMPACT TELECOM 379.07 458945 608627765 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 379.07 424058 4/26/2018 142335 INTEGRAL ADVISORS, INC 1,500.00 458886 678 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 1,500.00 424059 4/26/2018 138240 INTERMEDIX 6,335.14 MARCH AMB BILLING 458980 INVADPI25802 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,335.14 424060 4/26/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,165.60 458421 2809036 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,165.60 424061 4/26/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,836.67 458416 5982383 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 123.19 458419 5982384 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 38.19 458418 5982398 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,556.36 458427 5982399 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,433.56 458426 5982400 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,459.62 458430 5982401 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 417.45 458429 5982402 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.19 458417 5982403 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,568.63 458428 5982404 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 689.94 458740 5987811 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,281.81 458739 5987812 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 340.06 458738 5987813 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 951.94 458818 5987814 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424061 4/26/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 479.48 458817 5987815 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,393.21 458765 5987818 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 367.72 458769 5987819 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,183.14 458777 5987820 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,605.98 458754 5987822 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 323.57 458771 5987823 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,829.84 458770 5987824 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.13- 458457 675066 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.01- 458456 675067 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.41- 458748 675300 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 73.30- 458749 675301 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.67- 458761 675303 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.82- 458762 675304 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27,777.21 424062 4/26/2018 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 48.20 AC KEYS 458932 S1059248 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 40.00 EP KEYS 458932 S1059248 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 88.20 424063 4/26/2018 133739 KFD TRAINING & CONSULTATION LLC 4,000.00 LE DIFFUSION STRATEGIES COURSE 458990 2337 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 4,000.00 424064 4/26/2018 115192 KNUDSON, DEBORAH 1,008.00 LESSONS 4/5-4/18 458902 41918 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,008.00 424065 4/26/2018 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 225.91 TOWING FEE 458702 77253 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 225.91 424066 4/26/2018 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 3,266.40- LANDS' END 450581 SCR680537 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 60.00- LANDS' END 450580 SCR680539 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 665.95 457507 SIN6018398 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 665.96 457507 SIN6018398 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 665.96 457507 SIN6018398 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5,280.00 2018 LANDS END ORDER 458998 SIN6093598 1556.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,951.47 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 — Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424066 4/26/2018 424067 4/26/2018 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 142336 LEGACY COMPANIES Continued... 30.00 7711 COMPUTER AVE 458868 162172 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 30.00 424068 4/26/2018 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 364.50 458470 14112 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 364.50 424069 4/26/2018 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 1,811.59 APRIL CI AND ACC INVOICE 458961 AL960627 9900.2033.28 ACCIDENT AND CRITICAL INS PAYROLL CLEARING 1,811.59 424070 4/26/2018 102464 LIGHTING PLASTICS OF MINNESOTA INC. 28.70 LENS 458912 INV80496 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.70 424071 4/26/2018 139469 LUBE TECH LIQUID RECYCLING 100.00 458951 1133719 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 424072 4/26/2018 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 162.00 458420 11650 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 162.00 424073 4/26/2018 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 142.80 P&E SUPPLIES 458920 343465 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 142.80 424074 4/26/2018 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 52.98 VEHICLE REPAIR PARTS 458935 P00967 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 781.48 SHEAR BOLTS AND NUTS 458707 P12104 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 771.54 ECM SOFEWARE UPDATE 458716 W02328 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 328.20 REPAIR OF WATER PUMP 458715 W02380 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,934.20 424075 4/26/2018 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 37.84 REPAIR PARTS 458906 17417594 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 37.84 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 — 4/26/2018 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424076 4/26/2018 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC Continued... 210.00 PHONE SUPPORT 458806 210730 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 210.00 424077 4/26/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 453.64 CONTRACTED REPAIR 458955 331005 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 453.64 424078 4/26/2018 139880 MID CITY SERVICES - INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY 44.00 RUG LAUNDERING 458991 75856 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.00 424079 4/26/2018 102769 MILLER, TOM 355.50 LESSONS 4/5-4/18 458901 41918 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 355.50 424080 4/26/2018 122772 MINGER CONSTRUCTION INC. 21,962.30 PRESIDENTS AREA PAY #2 458959 PRESIDENTS AREA 03500.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Presidents Area Rehab Phase 2 4/18 21,962.30 424081 4/26/2018 142341 MINNEAPOLIS BRASS 50.00 PERFORMER ON MAY 6, 2018 458927 050618 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 50.00 424082 4/26/2018 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 43.01 458796 180105263 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 43.01 424083 '4/26/2018 102233 MINNESOTA PRIMA 425.00 2018 ANNUAL CONF-STAUNTON 458976 271445 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 425.00 424084 4/26/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 182.13 458448 5125 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 344.17 458764 5398 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 197.96 458903 5403 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 724.26 424085 4/26/2018 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 92.04 BUSHINGS, LINKS 458712 556710 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 — Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424085 424086 4/26/2018 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 100912 MOTOROLA INC. Continued... 4/26/2018 92.04 9,471.00 2 NEW OFFICER PORTABLE RADIOS 458695 13211127 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9,471.00 424087 4/26/2018 101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS 1,802.70 MGAAD 458791 2018-81795 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,802.70 424088 4/26/2018 142346 NASIEDLAK, ALEXA 13.00 ARTWORK SOLD 458970 042318 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 424089 4/26/2018 124203 NAVIKA USA INC. 331.36 MERCHANDISE 458547 00055794 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 331.36 424090 4/26/2018 141215 NEGOCE LLC 185.46 458751 5/17/2018 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 185.46 424091 4/26/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 268.50 458481 130306 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,099.50 458746 130480 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,368.00 424092 4/26/2018 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 PERFORMER ON MAY 13, 2018 458925 051318 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 75.00 424093 4/26/2018 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 6,600.79 WELL 9 REMODEL 458835 #7-4/18 05569.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Well #9 Building and Rehab 6,600.79 424094 4/26/2018 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 20.25 LANGUAGE LINE BOOKING 458943 W18030641 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20.25 424095 4/26/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424095 4/26/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES Continued... 69.34 RATCHET BINDER X 2 458988 617207 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 72.08 GOAL PARTS 458801 617576 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 141.42 424096 4/26/2018 142348 OPITZ, MAX 19.50 ARTWORK SOLD 458972 042318 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 424097 4/26/2018 101659 ORKIN 24.20 RAMP PEST CONTROL TRASH AREA 458839 169017285 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 24.20 RAMP PEST CONTROL 458838 169018138 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 30.00 EDINA SPORTS STORAGE PAM PARK 458977 169018891 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.00 HIST SOCIETY ARNESON PEST 458978 169018892 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 200.00 GRANGE CAHIL FLY CONTROL 458979 172496684 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 338.40 424098 4/26/2018 142347 PALMER, FRANKIE 22.75 ARTWORK SOLD 458971 042318 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 424099 4/26/2018 141248 PAPER ROLL PRODUCTS 997.50 SQUAD PAPER 458859 41933 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 997.50 424100 4/26/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 245.25 458433 6200 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 924.95 458434 7350 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 748.70 458474 8162 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.00 458407 8163 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 820.10 458515 8174 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,826.00 424101 4/26/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 372.92 CONCESSIONS FOOD 458687 48920302 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 372.92 424102 4/26/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 3,918.91 458477 2332019 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,084.55 458940 2332020 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,260.84 458492 2335650 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 - 4/26/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Page- 21 Business Unit 424102 4/26/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 894.83 458414 2339320 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,397.44 458415 2339321 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.69 458452 2340277 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 187.14 458453 2340280 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 121.19 458741 2343022 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 121.19 458756 2343023 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 178.50 458742 2343024 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,383.36 458745 2343025 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 125.07 458755 2343028 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,941.12 458757 2343029 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,161.85 458747 2343030 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.42- 458459 291700 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 44.80- 458458 291701 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17,753.46 424103 4/26/2018 100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 14.33 SPRING 458953 01AY7945 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.33 424104 4/26/2018 134007 PJ TAILORS & CLEANERS 18.00 LAUNDER JAIL BLANKET 458724 3904 1400.6201 LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 36.00 LAUNDER JAIL BLANKETS 458723 8926 1400.6201 LAUNDRY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 54.00 424105 4/26/2018 140243 PK BLOODY MARY CORP. 216.00 458454 214165 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 216.00 424106 4/26/2018 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 46.68 PEST CONTROL 458730 5901257 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.68 424107 4/26/2018 128861 PRIMARY PRODUCTS COMPANY 654.50 MEDICAL GLOVES 458692 63858 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 654.50 424108 4/26/2018 120783 R E CARLSON INC. 125.99 HUMID PROB AHU1 458989 0049140 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 125.99 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page- 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 — Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424109 4/26/2018 142337 R PLUMBING CO Continued... 56.68 5421 MALIBU DR-JOB CANCELLED 458869 161759 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 56.68 424110 4/26/2018 142324 RATELLE, THERESE 135.76 REFUND 458555 100733 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 135.76 424111 4/26/2018 141962 REAL LIFE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 475.00 ADVANCED CARRY CLASS 458824 04202018 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 475.00 424112 4/26/2018 134496 REFINED LLC 24.81 REFUND 458552 120061 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 24.81 424113 4/26/2018 142340 RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD 3,000.00 NORTH RAMP EXT. DESIGN 458967 194570 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,000.00 424114 4/26/2018 139439 RUE 38 LLC 89.50 458467 3058 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 89.50 424115 4/26/2018 142252 SEECLICKFIX 8,057.88 SEECLICKFIX 458992 2017-1551 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 630.04 SEECLICKFIX 458992 2017-1551 5924.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 630.04 SEECLICKFIX 458992 2017-1551 5925.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 630.04 SEECLICKFIX 458992 2017-1551 5960.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 9,948.00 424116 4/26/2018 100995 SEH 5,755.08 458836 348744 05572.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-572 RAW WTR WELL 21 TO VVTP 5,755.08 424117 4/26/2018 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 47.00 LETTERING ON OFFICE SIGN 458986 61477 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 47.00 424118 4/26/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 335.77 NORTH RAMP EXP - WAYFINDING 458849 12807 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 23 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424118 4/26/2018 120784 SIGN PRO Continued... 174.00 NORTH RAMP EXP-TEMP PARKING 458850 12821 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 35.00 NORTH RAMP EXP - WAYFINDING 458852 12840 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 544.77 424119 4/26/2018 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 63.62 PUNCH SET 458708 35808582 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.91 WRENCH SET, HEX KEYS 458709 35822286 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.65 CRIMP CUTTER 458714 ARV/35877722 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 115.18 424120 4/26/2018 105739 SNAZA, DAVID 260.00 458669 20180418 5919.6106 MEETING EXPENSE TRAINING 260.00 424121 4/26/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 62.66 458488 1669564 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 357.60 458485 1669565 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 104.76 458487 1669566 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 788.58 458484 1669567 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,740.00- 458483 1669568 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,740.00 458483 1669568 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,740.00 458483 1669568 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 128.80 458486 1669569 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4.00 458936 1670893 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,048.00 458406 1672117 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 858.24 458478 1672118 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 200.80 458409 1672119 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,165.73 458461 1672120 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,050.48 458460 1672121 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 176.80 458469 1672122 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,136.00 458462 1672123 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,843.00 458471 1672124 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 128.80 458508 1672125 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,793.51 458783 1672127 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,232.00 458510 1672128 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17,819.76 424122 4/26/2018 129891 SPACK CONSULTING 900.00 TRAFFIC STUDY 458735 5820 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 900.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424122 424123 4/26/2018 4/26/2018 129891 SPACK CONSULTING 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Continued... 21,186.44 NORTH RAMP EXP - OWNER REP 458844 10930.00-7 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 21,186.44 424124 4/26/2018 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 8,122.88 GARBAGE CANS 458913 19716 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8,122.88 424125 4/26/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 388.00 458442 20889 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 294.00 458750 21012 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 682.00 424126 4/26/2018 102786 STOP STICK LTD 662.00 STOP STICK AND EQUIP 458858 0011582-IN 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 662.00 424127 4/26/2018 141470 SUPERION, LLC 906.00 SUPERION ADMIN TRAIN 458867 206466 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,288.00 SUPERION ADMIN TRAIN 458867 206466 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 366.00 SUPERION ADMIN TRAIN 458867 206466 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 640.00 RMS PURGE 458866 206467 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,200.00 424128 4/26/2018 142338 THOMAS, DIANE 303.43 REFUND 458863 121038-16056119 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 2 303.43 424129 4/26/2018 138283 TIN WHISKERS BREWING CO LLC 265.00 458790 E-2293 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 351.80 458778 E-2315 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 616.80 424130 4/26/2018 136022 TRI-K SPORTS 483.87 RANGER TIRES 458996 8471 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 53.76 RANGER TIRES 458996 8471 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 537.63 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 - 4/26/2018 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424131 4/26/2018 114236 USA BLUE BOOK Continued-. 417.57 PRESSURE GAUGES 458826 547020 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 417.57 424132 4/26/2018 100050 USPS 500.00 POSTAGE 458553 20180418 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 500.00 POSTAGE 458553 20180418 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1,000.00 424133 4/26/2018 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 4.03 458368 447574-00 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 394.82 458370 459464-00 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 500.38 458371 459465-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 61.92 458372 459467-00 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 961.15 424134 4/26/2018 132751 WARNING LITES OF MN 44.95 ADAM TRAIN 458910 200026 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 44.95 VVIERKE TRAIN 458909 200027 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 89.90 424135 4/26/2018 122059 WASHINGTON COUNTY FINANCIAL SERVICES 1,603.85 911 DATA CTR/FIBER LEASE 458697 137655 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,603.85 424136 4/26/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 88.57 FS 2 458734 0039270-2808-8 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 125.91 FS 1 458734 0039270-2808-8 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 215.47 SENIOR CTR 458734 0039270-2808-8 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 353.06 CITY HALL 458734 0039270-2808-8 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 498.87 ROSLAND PARK 458734 0039270-2808-8 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 717.19 PW BLDG 458734 0039270-2808-8 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 717.20 PW MAINT 458734 0039270-2808-8 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 93.49 ART CENTER 458734 0039270-2808-8 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 227.15 GOLF DOME 458734 0039270-2808-8 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 116.95 BRAE CLB HOUSE 458734 0039270-2808-8 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 141.45 BRAE MAINT 458734 0039270-2808-8 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,624.43 ARENA 458734 0039270-2808-8 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,719.04 EDINBOU 458734 0039270-2808-8 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 107.89 GV LIQ 458734 0039270-2808-8 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 171.12 YORK LIQ 458734 0039270-2808-8 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 4/26/2018 - Inv No 4/26/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424136 424137 4/26/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC. Continued... 4/26/2018 6,917.79 717.09 LEAK LOCATES 458823 8498 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 717.09 424138 4/26/2018 100509 WATERLOO, PATRICK 99.74 MILEAGE 458894 41818 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 99.74 424139 4/26/2018 130574 WATSON COMPANY 273.15 CONCESSIONS FOOD 458830 886751 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 273.15 424140 4/26/2018 142194 WE CATER TO YOU 580.64 PRINCESS BALL 458975 4322 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 580.64 424141 4/26/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 2.38 458425 7178761 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,416.42 458424 7178765 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.88 458413 7178766 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 194.38 458819 7179729 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 760.33 458772 7179730 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,709.33 458773 7179732 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.88 458774 7179733 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 175.19 458904 7179952 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,341.79 424142 4/26/2018 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY 195.00 458455 1012 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 195.00 424143 4/26/2018 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 812.80 458509 1672126 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 812.80 424144 4/26/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 3,402.22 458871 586935792 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 558.14 458874 587049003 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/26/2018 — 4/26/2018 4/25/2018 12:22:10 Page- 27 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424144 4/26/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 594.28 3,661.69 4,616.91 12,833.24 458873 587155199 458872 587526001 458944 588180417 Continued... 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 891,547.72 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 798,902.34 92,645.38 891,547.72 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 4/25/2018 12:22:15 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page - 1 4/26/2018 - 4/26/2018 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 234,670.95 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 6,982.31 02700 CONSERVATION & SUSTAINABILITY 7,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 14,379.57 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 349.50 05100 ART CENTER FUND 816.04 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 5,002.92 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,232.96 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 6,626.20 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 8,732.10 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 10,159.15 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 15,019.60 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,837.61 05800 LIQUOR FUND 167,810.19 05900 UTILITY FUND 73,890.15 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 630.04 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 297,614.99 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,728.44 09210 HRAADMINISTRATION 575.00 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 29,103.41 09238 SOUTH DALE 2 DISTRICT 575.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 1,811.59 Report Totals 891,547.72 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6355 5/3/2018 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 519.09 REEL CORD, SWITCH 459196 155790-IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 519.09 6356 5/3/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 117.31 459009 2225641 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 49.68 459361 2229019 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 110.39 459263 2229022 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 277.38 6357 5/3/2018 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 451.41 COFFEE - FIRE 459247 11318900 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 451.41 6358 5/3/2018 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 1,575.00 459071 23270354.00-237 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 10,128.50 LIFT STATION #6 459284 23271638.00-1 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 11,703.50 6359 5/3/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,709.20- 459038 63813100. 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,709.20- 459038 63813100 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,709.20 459038 63813100 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,709.20 459038 63813100 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,709.20 459038 63813100 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 794.20 459168 63897200 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,608.60 459373 63897400 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 710.30 459367 63897500 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 253.41 459037 97489100 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,075.71 6360 5/3/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 134.81 PW OFFICE SUPPLIES 459420 138661 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 134.81 6361 5/3/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 13.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 459129 WO-377175-1 1600.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 13.26 6362 5/3/2018 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 435.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES 459251 519370 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 — 5/3/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page- 2 Business Unit 6362 5/3/2018 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD Continued... 435.00 6363 5/3/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 56.00 459025 443326 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,446.00 459024 67-3888 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 245.00 459169 67-3929 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 335.00 459375 67-3930 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 304.00 459528 67-3953 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,386.00 6364 5/3/2018 101345 COLOURS 8,644.00 ABOUT TOWN - SPRING DESIGN 459416 10580 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 8,644.00 6365 5/3/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 130.90 PUBLISH 2018 BOARD OF REVIEW N 459104 589652 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 59.50 PUBLISH ORD 2018-5 459103 589654 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 190.40 6366 5/3/2018 134730 EXPLORE EDINA 28,877.03 MARCH LODGING TAX 459407 043018 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES 28,877.03 6367 5/3/2018 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 73.15 459027 154613 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 73.15 6368 5/3/2018 128215 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA 3,680.00 FRANCE/HAZELTON LANDSCAPING 459215 7736 01267.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MSA Maintenance Projects 3,680.00 6369 5/3/2018 128215 HOFFMAN & MCNAMARA 3,680.00 FRANCE & HAZELTON LANDSCAPING 459484 7737 01267.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MSA Maintenance Projects 3,680.00 6370 5/3/2018 129508 IMPACT 570.99 459216 132247 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 570.99 6371 5/3/2018 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page- 3 Business Unit 6371 5/3/2018 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. Continued... 756.00 PPE FOR BALL & LARSON 459426 247535 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 756.00 6372 5/3/2018 100858 LOGIS 780.00 WATCHGUARD CONSULT 459085 45188 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,257.50 IT CONSULTING 459085 45188 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,800.00 PHONE NETWORK PREP 459085 45188 421554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT IT CENTRAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT 2,580.00 WATCHGUARD CONSULT 459085 45188 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 7,417.50 6373 5/3/2018 101483 MENARDS 98.00- CREDIT- PD BREAKROOM REMODEL 459454 66380CR 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.83 GOAL PAINT SUPPLIES 459049 66464 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4.28 459083 66506 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 54.83 SKATE SHOW SUPPLIES 459048 66559 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 23.63 GENERAL SUPPLIES 459110 66679 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 52.56 PAMELA SUPPLIES 459205 66697 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 14.88 TAPE 459246 66768 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 15.97- CREDIT- PD BREAKROOM REMODEL 459455 66770 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 36.92 PD BREAKROOM REMODEL 459456 66773 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 41.09 PIPE 459188 66775 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 108.81 CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES 459422 66783 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 37.45- PLUMBING SUPPLIES 459421 66805 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 49.94 PAMELA ROOF 459501 66947 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 238.37 4X4X8' CEDAR POST 459494 67182 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 80.41 TIM SUPPLIES 459508 67197 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 634.13 6374 5/3/2018 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 211.60 459088 40688 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 255.31 459088 40688 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 466.91 6375 5/3/2018 100898 MINVALCO 346.01 HEAT PUMP REPAIR MAT 459089 118252 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 346.01 6376 5/3/2018 129485 PAPCO INC. 121.79 CLEANING SUPPLIES 459489 206784 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 121.79 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6376 6377 5/3/2018 5/3/2018 129485 PAPCO INC. 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. Continued... 95.00 TIRES 459447 210341482 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.00 SCRAP TIRE PICKUP 459446 210342138 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,678.00 TIRES, SCRAP PICKUP 459517 210342765 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,853.00 6378 5/3/2018 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 157.25 PAPER TOWELS, TISSUE 459228 14203 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 479.01 LINERS, FOAMY CLEANER, GLOVES 459228 14203 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 95.82 BACKPACK VAC PARTS 459229 14204 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 190.78 9600 COMPOSTABLE STRAWS 459465 14209 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 922.86 6379 5/3/2018 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC. 1,221.58 ARNESON PROTEC 459487 85360 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,221.58 6360 5/3/2018 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 82.93 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 459424 42718 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 82.93 6381 5/3/2018 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 107.73 CARDS 459187 99819 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 107.73 6382 5/3/2018 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 1,812.50 459135 1971 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,812.50 459135 1971 05570.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS General Rehab - Water 4,625.00 6383 5/3/2018 104672 SPRINT 16.85 459408 873184124 1553.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 185-4/18 16.85 459408 873184124 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 185-4/18 39.99 459408 873184124 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 185-4/18 55.85 459408 873184124 1322.6188 TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 185-4/18 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page- 5 Business Unit 6383 5/3/2018 104672 SPRINT Continued... 62.12 459408 873184124 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 185-4/18 94.11 459408 873184124 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 185-4/18 121.84 459408 873184124 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 185-4/18 78.29 459408 873184124 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 185-4/18 485.90 6384 5/3/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 79.66 TOILET REPAIR 459186 S3589150.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.47 SLOAN PARTS 459507 S3589150.002 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 68.48 STA. 1 BOILER REPAIR 459427 S3591338.001 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 169.61 6385 5/3/2018 101015 STREICHERS 948.50 BALLISTIC VEST - CSO 459226 11311672 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 948.50 6386 5/3/2018 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 1,109.10 MOWER PARTS 459185 E105565 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 1,109.10 6387 5/3/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 129.00 459039 0204990 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 129.00 459363 0205498 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 658.00 459364 0205499 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 121.50 459165 0205500-IN 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 521.00 459166 205501-IN 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 228.50 459167 205502-IN 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,787.00 6388 5/3/2018 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 282.89 CONCESSIONS FOOD 459482 51618468 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 282.89 6389 5/3/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,679.80 459006 68540 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 989.45 459116 69275 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6389 5/3/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE Continued... 472.25 459348 69345 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,463.80 459272 69346 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,605.30 424145 5/3/2018 108757 3D SPECIALTIES 1,076.82 TELSPAR SIGN POST 459522 202107 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,076.82 424146 5/3/2018 100609 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION 2,910.00 459079 2228 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 2,910.00 424147 5/3/2018 142327 56 BREWING, LLC 370.00 459115 5602146 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 184.00 459283 5602147 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 340.00 459350 5602148 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 894.00 424148 5/3/2018 100611 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 25.07 SUCTION CUP HANDLES 459493 124753 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 25.07 424149 5/3/2018 142371 ACCOUNTING RESOURCE GROUP INC. 31.37 REFUND 459234 100992 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 31.37 424150 5/3/2018 129458 ACME TOOLS 358.98 DRILL TK 459130 5696369 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 499.99 459182 5696399 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 858.97 424151 5/3/2018 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 117.06 MERCHANDISE 459056 905643914 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 99.37 MERCHANDISE 459054 905653873 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 193.74 MERCHANDISE 459055 905653874 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 85.11 MERCHANDISE 459057 905682040 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 187.98 MERCHANDISE 459459 905715160 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 119.00 MERCHANDISE 459457 905724457 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 119.72 MERCHANDISE 459458 905735462 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 921.98 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424151 424152 5/3/2018 5/3/2018 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 101166 AHEAD INC Continued... 1,549.08 MERCHANDISE 459316 INV0364565 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,549.08 424153 5/3/2018 142387 AIRSTAR AMERICA INC 4,081.25 BALLOON LIGHTS 459520 SR-INV-FL-01869 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 5 4,081.25 424154 5/3/2018 120984 ALL GOALS INC. 1,947.00 NETS 459505 21110 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 564.00 NETS 459506 21113 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 2,511.00 424155 5/3/2018 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 108.00 CARIBOU COFFEE 459466 71127 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 108.00 424156 5/3/2018 103160 AL'S VACUUM & JANITORIAL 12.70 VACUUM BAGS 459308 28690 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 12.70 424157 5/3/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 48.98 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 459315 114M-GLXX-6GKK 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 14.99 HORTICULTURE SUPPLIES 459075 133T-HMKG-QG4C 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 101.94 PICKLEBALLS FOR LEAGUE 459414 13PV-9F1K-NDV9 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 131.95 EDINBPARK MICE AND KEYBOARD 459139 1G6V-31HK-3TRQ 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 2.95 SCISSORS 459051 1JHM-LYVVV-RJ69 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 31.99 PENS 459180 1KL4-QCFP-QTH7 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 15.54 BACKPACK 459050 1THJ-NYTM-GKDN 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 174.52 BOAT REPAIR SUPPLIES 459076 1VJH-CHQD-C3FY 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 69.98 USB C VIDEO ADAPTERS 459087 1VJH-CHQD-NKKF 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 592.84 424158 5/3/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 193.29 LAUNDRY 459122 1004116527 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 140.21 LAUNDRY 459121 1004118265 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 123.82 LAUNDRY 459331 1004122579 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 457.32 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424158 424159 5/3/2018 5/3/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER Continued-. 1772.75 FIBER WORK FOR SECOND RADIO 459063 77630 2310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES E911 1,772.75 424160 5/3/2018 119976 AP LAWN 1,639.50 SNOW REMOVAL 459232 EDPARK-418S 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,639.50 424161 5/3/2018 141972 AP MIDWEST LLC 1,028,712.16 459532 APPL 3 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,028712.16 424162 5/3/2018 137556 ARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE 3,250.00 COMP. PLAN 459413 201811 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 806.25 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW- PROJECTS 459498 201814 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 4,056.25 424163 5/3/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 168.00 459010 3255828 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,334.10 459011 3255830 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1700.50 459170 3257512 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,886.70 459366 3257513 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.16- 459171 419644 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,084.14 424164 5/3/2018 106304 ASPEN MILLS 199.85 UNIFORMS 459126 215124 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,452.45 UNIFORMS 459124 215125 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 284.35 UNIFORMS 459123 215126 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 370.55 UNIFORMS 459125 215128 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.50 UNIFORMS 459334 215491 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.50 UNIFORMS 459333 215492 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 98.85 UNIFORMS 459335 215493 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 122.95 UNIFORMS 459336 215524 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,574.00 424165 5/3/2018 142368 BACHRACH, RICHARD 30.39 REFUND 459225 88353 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 30.39 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424165 424166 5/3/2018 5/3/2018 142368 BACHRACH, RICHARD 102195 BATTERIES PLUS Continued... 38.95 WAYFIND BATTERY 459132 P912249 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 38.95 424167 5/3/2018 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 390.00 PIZZA 459467 4749907 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 390.00 424168 5/3/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 1,093.21 459003 420407 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 60.00 459369 421718 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,054.62 459368 421719 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 40.00 459290 421721 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,946.10 459288 421722 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,082.90 459142 421851 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,276.83 424169 5/3/2018 140365 BIKO ASSOCIATES INC. 10,578.75 COMP. PLAN 457619 14-170105 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 6,831.50 COMP. PLAN 457620 4-170505 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 17,410.25 424170 5/3/2018 103832 BLACK & DECKER U.S. INC. 5.58 GRIND NUT KR 459452 8802460299 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 5.58 424171 5/3/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 144.00 459028 2225 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 459013 2226 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.00 459119 2276 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 441.00 459352 2286 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,062.00 424172 5/3/2018 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 273.90 GROUND LIGHTS TRIM RING 459131 915153966 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 273.90 424173 5/3/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 342.00 459092 150254 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424173 5/3/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS Continued... 194.68 459347 150345 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,040.17 459529 150465 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,198.00 459035 15072 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,774.85 424174 5/3/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 2,183.12 BRAKE SHOES, DRUMS 459512 1222544 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,933.20 BRAKE DRUMS 459511 1222544X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 698.94 BRAKE DRUMS, SEALS 459202 1223132 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.01 ROLLER, BRAKE VALVE 459201 1223185 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.54 STING ARM, NUTS 459175 1224192 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.38 LAMP 459179 1224623 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,937.19 424175 5/3/2018 120798 BOYER TRUCKS LAUDERDALE 78,074.00 2019 STERLING TRUCK 459510 WS19688 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 78,074.00 424176 5/3/2018 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 270.00 B/C & VOLUNT RECOGNITIONS 459248 9835 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 270.00 424177 5/3/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,191.33 459267 1080790752 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 90.30 459268 1080790753 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,085.73 459269 1080790824 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,434.17 459253 1080791797 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,388.24 459254 1080791798 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 103.16 459360 1080791799 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,820.73 459362 1080791800 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,004.89 459356 1080791801 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 328.58- 459031 2080199527 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 26.63- 459032 2080200070 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15,763.34 424178 5/3/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 6,220.95 459005 1090845501 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,850.00 459279 1090848246 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.65 459280 1090848247 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,801.85 459097 1090848248 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 11 Business Unit 424178 5/3/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC Continued... 7,068.90 459033 1090848249 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 723.99 459523 1090851157 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19,742.34 424179 5/3/2018 136782 C&C COURTS INC. 450.00 FUTSAL INSTALL 459485 2018-231 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 450.00 424180 5/3/2018 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 198.58 MERCHANDISE 459059 928967251 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 163.86 MERCHANDISE 459060 928967253 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 827.19 EQUIPMENT FOR CLINIC 459324 929001354 5410.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,189.63 424181 5/3/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 926.05 459096 2095061 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 50.00 459343 2095862 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,486.45 459343 2095862 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 58.25 459344 2095863 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.35 459095 2095864 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 132.00- 459282 2095865 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 132.00 459282 2095865 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 132.00 459282 2095865 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,927.10 459282 2095865 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 151.25- 459524 2098987 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 132.00 459525 2098988 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,294.80 459525 2098988 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16,877.75 424182 5/3/2018 142365 CARTUS 37.21 REFUND 459222 122162 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 37.21 424183 5/3/2018 141269 CAYAN 379.20 459080 624448 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL 607.70 459081 627373 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 790.75 459082 627444 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,777.65 424184 5/3/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424184 5/3/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 71.73 NEW CLASSROOM HEAT 459105 10633418-8/4-20 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 18 1,208.16 MAIN BLDG HEAT 459127 5584304.9/4-201 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 8 50.21 FIRE TOWER HEAT 459106 5584310-6/4-201 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 8 29.71 SIM FUEL 459107 5590919-6/4-201 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 8 3,863.90 459406 591458-4/18 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 79.78 459405 9546705-4/18 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5,303.49 424185 5/3/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 129.53 459436 0024-4/18 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 60.88 459434 1565-4/18 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.22 459433 1586-4/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 84.74 459435 2444-4/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 65.22 459417 9529208632/4-20 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 18 400.59 424186 5/3/2018 100683 CHEMSEARCH 250.00 EAST CONDENSOR 459133 3093010 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 250.00 424187 5/3/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 14.44 RENTAL UNIFORM 459120 4005368508 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 37.84 RENTAL UNIFORM 459069 4005368509 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.60 LAUNDRY 459068 4005368514 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 45.97 RENTAL UNIFORM 459070 4005368515 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19.92 RENTAL UNIFORM 459067 4005368555 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 152.77 424188 5/3/2018 102123 CIT GROUP/COMMERCIAL SERVICES, THE 624.20 MERCHANDISE 459460 80140 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 624.20 424189 5/3/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 90.77 459077 0200862003-4/18 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER YORK OCCUPANCY 106.38 459078 0203163003-4/18 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424189 5/3/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Continued... 197.15 424190 5/3/2018 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 1,054.83 459084 M424-002073-MAY 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 1,054.83 424191 5/3/2018 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC. 737.11 CONCESSIONS FOOD 459481 6487374 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 737.11 424192 5/3/2018 133672 CROIX OIL COMPANY 343.00 SQUAD CAR WASHES 459227 479351 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 343.00 424193 5/3/2018 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 489.52 CUSTOM HOSE 459150 91793 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 489.52 424194 5/3/2018 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 840.00 ANNUAL SERVICE - ST. 2 459328 120380 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 820.00 ANNUAL SERVICE - ST. 1 459329 120381 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,660.00 424195 5/3/2018 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 828.23 REPLACE SEAL ON HOUSE BOILER 459472 3177519 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 828.23 424196 5/3/2018 116713 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CO., THE 150.00 TREE DIAGNOSIS 459531 912359193 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 150.00 424197 5/3/2018 142378 DAVIES, PAT 14.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 459241 042718 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 186.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 459241 042718 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 424198 5/3/2018 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 37.98 IMPACT GLOVES 459197 40550 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119.38 PRYBAR SET 459198 40627 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 153.99 WRENCH 459438 52123 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424198 5/3/2018 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Continued... 141.26 USB LIGHTS 459480 52381 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 452.61 424199 5/3/2018 118805 DISCOUNT STEEL INC. 404.37 STEEL 459152 4327598 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 404.37 424200 5/3/2018 142384 DWYER, STEVEN 339.54 REFUND 459314 202281066 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 339.54 424201 5/3/2018 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 75.00 REFUND VOLUNTEER RECOGN EVENT 459244 04-27-2018 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 75.00 424202 5/3/2018 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 62.36 GAS SPRING FOR K-9 SQUAD 459338 AW041318-6 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 62.36 424203 5/3/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 7.65 BELT 459174 1-5557740 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 137.71 BATTERY 459440 1-5560419 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.42 BATTERY 459176 1-Z14260 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 204.58 HUB ASSY 459151 69-307799 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.16 TENSIONER 459203 69-308310 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.07 BATTERY 459442 69-308326 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.23 FUNNEL BODY 459444 69-308473 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.06 BATTERY 459441 69-308652 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.05 BATTERY 459445 69-308676 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 189.82 HUB ASSY 459431 69-308748 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 934.75 424204 5/3/2018 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 86.48 NUTS AND BOLTS 459300 MNTC2152183 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 86.48 424205 5/3/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,909.48 METERS 459516 278292 5916.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER READING 989.56- RETURNS 459296 CM025689 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 919.92 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424205 424206 5/3/2018 5/3/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 142369 FISCHER, DAVID Continued... 139.50 REFUND 459233 93179 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 139.50 424207 5/3/2018 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 702.25 459304 22309 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 702.25 424208 5/3/2018 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 227.70 SCISSOR LIFT INSPECTION 459157 01S6342160 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 175.95 LIFT INSPECTION 459159 01S6342180 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 403.65 424209 5/3/2018 137685 FORTERRA PIPE & PRECAST 1,016.60 ADJUSTING RINGS 459519 SH00010947 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,016.60 424210 5/3/2018 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 774.24 MERCHANDISE 459323 5981790 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 32.50- DAMAGED MEERCH CREDIT 459052 80160599 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 741.74 424211 5/3/2018 100773 GENERAL PARTS LLC 165.42 SANITIZER 459488 1664000 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 165.42 424212 5/3/2018 101103 GRAINGER 126.81 LOCATING WAND 459281 9762910496 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 9.99 BRUSH 459195 9764604154 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.16 MAGNETS 459439 9769346884 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 156.36 LOCATE PAINT 459451 9770224989 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 67.90 HOUR METERS 459497 9772604659 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 54.00 HAND CLEANING TOWELS 459496 9772927175 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 421.22 424213 5/3/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 509.00 459015 MN00038270 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 514.50 459271 MN00038517 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 760.27 459355 MN00038556 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 — Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424213 5/3/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Continued... 596.50 459099 MN00038558 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,380.27 424214 5/3/2018 121256 GREAT RIVERS PRINTING 400.00 BAGS FOR OPEN HOUSE 459418 56201 5913.6575 PRINTING DISTRIBUTION 400.00 424215 5/3/2018 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 225.00 FIDELITY CLINIC 459305 42518 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 225.00 424216 5/3/2018 124340 GRIMES, DORIS 22.00 SMART DRIVING CLASS REFUND 459212 04262018 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 22.00 424217 5/3/2018 138213 GUTIERREZ, RACHEL 75.00 ARTWORK REIMBURSEMENT 459491 043018 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 75.00 424218 5/3/2018 100788 H&L MESABI 1,235.60 PLOW BLADES 459518 00997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,235.60 424219 5/3/2018 142363 HAFNER, TOM 39.45 REFUND 459220 121020 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 39.45 424220 5/3/2018 142367 HALLING, BARTON 32.31 REFUND 459224 111927 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 32.31 424221 5/3/2018 103884 HANCO CORPORATION 64.23 FIBERGLASS WHEEL 459161 411526 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.23 424222 5/3/2018 142372 HARTIG, JOHN 649.68 REFUND 459235 80332 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 649.68 424223 5/3/2018 100797 HAWKINS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 — 5/3/2018 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 17 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424223 5/3/2018 100797 HAWKINS INC. Continued... 4,302.72 CHEMICALS 459515 4268258 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,302.72 424224 5/3/2018 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 850.00 EMT 2 OFFICERS 459210 55762 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 850.00 424225 5/3/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 26,219.49 1ST HALF TAXES 459211 03272018 1503.6915 SPECIALASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 22,729.02 1ST HALF TAXES 459211 03272018 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 5,484.78 1ST HALF TAXES 459211 03272018 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 54,433.29 424226 5/3/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 816.75 HENN. CO. ROOM & BOARD 459401 1000109834 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 816.75 424227 5/3/2018 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 2,771.95 RAISING/LOWERING DESK 459337 642675 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 2,771.95 424228 5/3/2018 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 160.75 CONCESSIONS FOOD 459483 52835322 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 160.75 424229 5/3/2018 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 1,875.00 EQUIP REPL MONITORS 459181 59877686 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,875.00 424230 5/3/2018 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 185.60 FLOOR SCRUBBER PARTS 459134 700329794 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 185.60 424231 5/3/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,286.85 459093 959230 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 569.75 459526 960731 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,923.00 459012 969232 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,779.60 424232 5/3/2018 142364 HOLIDAY-LYNCH, NINA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424232 5/3/2018 142364 HOLIDAY-LYNCH, NINA Continued... 42.00 PARTIAL REFUND FOR YOGA 459221 04262018 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 42.00 424233 5/3/2018 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 81.86 FIRE #1 SINK FILTERS AND REPAI 459425 3567090 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.86 424234 5/3/2018 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 276.58 CHLORINE, ACID 459471 180424003 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 276.58 424235 5/3/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 37.06 FILTERS 459192 038042247 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.28 LUBRICANT 459177 038042675 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.32 FILTERS 459430 038042717 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.49 FILTERS 459432 038042907 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125.15 424236 5/3/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 342.50 459118 63104 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 502.00 459351 63105 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 243.13 459286 63106 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,087.63 424237 5/3/2018 130048 JANEX INC. 333.97 FLOOR SCRUBBER REPAIRS 459326 2986 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 333.97 424238 5/3/2018 142375 JB PATNAUDE 200.00 REFUND 459238 78568 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 200.00 424239 5/3/2018 142373 JENSEN, ELIZABETH 150.00 REFUND 459236 114403 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 150.00 424240 5/3/2018 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 2.39 ICE SCRAPER KR 459453 4/18-ELECTRICAL 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 4.39 SURFACE PEN BATTERY 459453 4/18-ELECTRICAL 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 8.79 459403 4/18-ENGINEERIN 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 19 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424240 5/3/2018 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE Continued... G 40.08 STATION SUPPLIES 459476 4/18-FIRE 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 59.15 PATROL SUPPLIES 459402 4/18-POLICE 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3.30 459500 4/18-STREETS 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 32.76 459500 4/18-STREETS 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 213.61 459500 4/18-STREETS 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 340.02 459500 4/18-STREETS 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 6.79 GENERAL SUPPIES 459474 4/18-UTILITIES 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 15.42 GENERAL SUPPIES 459474 4/18-UTILITIES 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT 54.22 GENERAL SUPPIES 459474 4/18-UTILITIES 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 105.47 GENERAL SUPPIES 459474 4/18-UTILITIES 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 10.49 REPAIR PARTS 459474 4/18-UTILITIES 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER 896.88 424241 5/3/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 3,418.70 459091 2809073 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 194.65 459173 2809074 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 167.90 459358 2809076A 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 94.10 459255 2809078 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,978.75 459265 498778 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,854.10 424242 5/3/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 296.38 459001 5987816 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12,016.99 459072 5987821 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,686.27 459034 5987828 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 242.13 459023 5987829 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,253.58 459021 5987830 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 456.44 459018 5987831 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,569.64 459000 5987832 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,322.20 459022 5987833 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .10 459382 5993192 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 38.19 459147 5993193 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 530.48 459146 5993194 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 757.77 459164 5993195 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 846.13 459149 5993196 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 232.76 459148 5993197 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 162.58 459380 5993198 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 193.63 459386 5993199 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 162.58 459260 5993200 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424242 5/3/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 763.45 459163 5993201 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 81.19 459295 5993202 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 88.88 459384 5993204 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,305.38 459376 5993205 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,767.71 459379 5993206 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 874.90 459385 5993207 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,596.46 459374 5993208 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,196.88 459381 5993209 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 91.00 459383 5993210 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,286.08 459393 5993211 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,401.96 459378 5993212 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 38.19 459259 5993216 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,547.12 459293 5993217 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,635.60 459292 5993218 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,362.56 459257 5993219 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,010.71 459258 5993220 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,361.20 459252 5993221 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 675.57 459391 5994451 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 53,852.69 424243 5/3/2018 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 60.23 RTU CONTROL 459492 1144240 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 60.23 424244 5/3/2018 102603 JONAS, LENORE 127.79 GALLERY SUPPLIES 459341 042718 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 127.79 424245 5/3/2018 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 170.00 TOWING FEE 459245 81670 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 170.00 424246 5/3/2018 133189 LANDMARK BUILDING CONTRACTORS 10,000.00 4608 CASCO AVE NEW HOM ESCROW 459207 151923 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 424247 5/3/2018 142374 LARIATE COMPANIES INC 90.00 REFUND 459237 123174 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 90.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 21 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424248 5/3/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Continued... 93.61 FITTINGS 459156 9305757821 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 490.84 NUTS BOLTS SCREWS TERMINALS 459158 9305757822 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 242.04 SCREWS, BITS 459178 9305768641 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 826.49 424249 5/3/2018 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 331,323.47 WC HOME QUARTERLY INVOICE 459461 4THQTR 2017 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 331,323.47 424250 5/3/2018 135867 LIBATION PROJECT 129.50 459278 14243 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 129.50 424251 5/3/2018 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 489.88 LIFT CYLINDER 459193 351902 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 489.88 424252 5/3/2018 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 17,442.00 CIP LOGGER REPLACEMENT 2017 459209 2777459 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT E911 1,500.00 CIP LOGGER REPLACEMENT 459062 2790054 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT E911 2,540.00 CIP LOGGER REPLACEMENT 2017 459061 2790690 2310.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT E911 21,482.00 424253 5/3/2018 142007 LUNNEBORG, MEGAN 15.81 459172 042418 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 15.81 424254 5/3/2018 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 360.00 459098 11786 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,080.00 459026 11787 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 774.00 459016 11788 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,214.00 424255 5/3/2018 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 238.50 P&E SUPPLIES 459217 343922 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 143.00 P&E SUPPLIES 459214 343923 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 381.50 424256 5/3/2018 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 6,000.00 459513 G00432 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 22 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 — Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424256 5/3/2018 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. Continued... 79.67 DIRT SHOE RUNNERS 459443 P12322 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,079.67 424257 5/3/2018 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 9,425.70 GAS 459138 772721 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9,101.67 GAS 459137 772722 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18,527.37 424258 5/3/2018 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 277.07 OXYGEN - ST. 2 459330 17447731 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 746.53 OXYGEN - ST. 1 459332 17454240 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,023.60 424259 5/3/2018 142349 MAX TREE FARM 6,180.00 TREES 459204 1031-18R 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 6,180.00 424260 5/3/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 2,624.16 CONTRACTED REPAIR 459136 330621 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,624.16 424261 5/3/2018 118464 MIDWEST TESTING LLC 430.00 METER TESTING 459287 4484 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR 430.00 424262 5/3/2018 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 204.00 APS ANNUAL FEE 459400 400413007107 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 204.00 424263 5/3/2018 116770 MINNEAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT 5,409.36 MN-TF1 MFD UQT3, EQUIP, CONSUM 459219 032318 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 5,409.36 424264 5/3/2018 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 228.00 459090 20063195 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 228.00 424265 5/3/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 367.00 3500 RACK CARDS 459230 24955 5710.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 719.82 4360 POSTCARDS 459231 25011 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 23 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424265 5/3/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued_ 1,086.82 424266 5/3/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 305.92 459036 5400 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 301.50 459365 5547 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 607.42 424267 5/3/2018 141377 MONTGOMERY BREWING COMPANY LLC 312.00 459345 42318_EDINAYORK 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 312.00 424268 5/3/2018 105595 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 255.31 REPAIR PARTS - TRACTOR REMOTE 459291 1158483-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 251.97 AXLE AND WHEEL ASSY 459153 1159982-00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 507.28 424269 5/3/2018 142385 MURPHY, MEREDITH 302.00 SKATE SCHOOL REFUND 459464 04302018 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 302.00 424270 5/3/2018 141215 NEGOCE LLC 159.48 459270 190387 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 159.48 424271 5/3/2018 142380 NEVILLE, REGINA 25.00 REFUND VOLUNT RECOGN EVENT 459249 04-27-2018 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 25.00 424272 5/3/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 275.00 459007 130479 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,098.50 459273 130715 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,098.50 459346 130716 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 532.00 459117 130717 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,004.00 424273 5/3/2018 122449 NEW LIFE ENTERPRISES INC. 34.20 INTRO CLASS HANDBOOKS 459490 12064 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 34.20 424274 5/3/2018 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424274 5/3/2018 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS Continued... 5,098.00 STREET SIGN MATERIAL 459521 TRFINV001211 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 5,098.00 424275 5/3/2018 105968 NHA HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING INC. 9,208.48 VFD WELL CONTROL 459183 19607982 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 9,208.48 424276 5/3/2018 104350 NIKE USA INC. 1,426.11 MERCHANDISE 459053 9917590917 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,426.11 424277 5/3/2018 142201 NORTHWEST LIGHTING SYSTEMS CO. 338.30 W LED 459479 107033 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 248.75 LED LAMPS 459448 107057 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 294.00 LED LAMPS FOR MECHANICS 459449 107080 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 881.05 424278 5/3/2018 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 22.80 SWIFTERS 459307 123121712001 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 51.09 CLEANING SUPPLIES 459309 123121872001 5210.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 22.80 SVVIFTERS 459306 123462887001 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 84.33 BATTERIES AND BAND AIDS 459311 123463000001 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 170.88 THERMAL PAPER 459313 125061648001 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 351.90 424279 5/3/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 32.50 LINKS 459294 618090 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 79.27 TOOLS 459298 618199 5921.6556 TOOLS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 111.77 424280 5/3/2018 101659 ORKIN 84.20 RAMP PEST CONTROL 459429 169018138-17249 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 6649 60.00 NORTH RAMP PEST CONTROL 459419 172496649 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 60.00 RAMP PEST CONTROL 459475 172496651 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 204.20 424281 5/3/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,888.40 459266 8899 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 614.85 459100 8902 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 25 Business Unit 424281 5/3/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 88.25 459101 8903 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,084.20 459354 8915 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.00 459349 8916 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,762.70 424282 5/3/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 167.48 PEPSI 459310 48920301 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 224.32 PEPSI 459468 53551553 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 391.80 424283 5/3/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 110.27 459008 2343033 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,503.40 459020 2343034 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,004.83 459019 2343035 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.00 459029 2343189 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 72.00 459030 2343190 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 648.00 459014 2343191 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 459141 2346678 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 158.69 459299 2346679 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 459261 2346680 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 845.95 459144 2346681 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,477.04 459145 2346682 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,616.35 459377 2346684 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,445.70 459370 2346685 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,837.57 459256 2346688 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 238.57 459264 2346689 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 716.40 459473 2346883 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 600.00 459397 2346884 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 600.00 459396 2346886 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 557.20 459395 2346888 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17,512.73 424284 5/3/2018 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC. 50.00 EMS FAXING 459477 418091446 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 EMS FAXING 459478 418091447 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 350.00 424285 5/3/2018 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC 623.60 PLAY PARTS 459206 1400220857 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 623.60 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 — Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424285 5/3/2018 424286 5/3/2018 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC 101138 PLEAA Continued... 210.00 PLEAA SPRING TRAINING 459303 20180427175 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 210.00 424287 5/3/2018 119507 PUKKA INC. 1,854.00 JR. LEAGUE HATS 459339 BU01274-IN 5410.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,854.00 424288 5/3/2018 141962 REAL LIFE TRAINING SOLUTIONS 250.00 VENDOR INSTRUCTOR 459108 20180423 7414.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 250.00 424289 5/3/2018 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC, 72.00 459017 K-49854440 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 72.00 424290 5/3/2018 142366 RNP ENTERPRISES 160.00 REFUND 459223 120717 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 160.00 424291 5/3/2018 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 946.92 SOFTNER SALT 459530 356906 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 946.92 424292 5/3/2018 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 121.50 459094 18-01914 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 385.20 459342 18-01915 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 65.46 459527 18-02065 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 572.16 424293 5/3/2018 141532 ROSEMOUNT FIRE DEPARTMENT 480.00 MN-TF1: UQT3 DYSON MILLER 459218 042618A 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 480.00 424294 5/3/2018 139439 RUE 38 LLC 89.50 459357 3108 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 89.50 424295 5/3/2018 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 27 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424295 5/3/2018 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. Continued... 845.64 NORTH RAMP ELEVATOR 459428 8104789365 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 845.64 424296 5/3/2018 142376 SCHULTZ, SCOTT 350.00 REFUND 459239 87047 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 350.00 424297 5/3/2018 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 485.00 SCOTT COUNTY WARRANT 459398 20180430PP 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 485.00 424298 5/3/2018 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 318.00 SCOTT COUNTY WARRANT 459399 D43018DB 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 318.00 424299 5/3/2018 134715 SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC. 127.11 REFUND 459213 124168 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 127.11 424300 5/3/2018 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 126.55 PAINT/ PAINT BRUSHES 459423 5861-1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 126.55 424301 5/3/2018 101556 SHRED-IT USA 81.85 SHREDDING SERVICES 459128 8124616270 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 81.85 424302 5/3/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 170.00 NORTH RAMP EXP - WAYFINDING 459045 12842 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 327.60 SAFETY: TRAINING SIGNS 459495 12848 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 70.00 NORTH RAMP EXP WAYFINDING 459499 12880 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 567.60 424303 5/3/2018 127004 SIGN SOURCE INC. 322.58 NORTH RAMP-WAYFINDING 459415 56769 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 322.58 424304 5/3/2018 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 26.65 CRIMP CUTTER 459199 35877722 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 106.04 DRIVER SET 459155 ARV/35907965 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424304 5/3/2018 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL Continued... 262.71 PLIERS, RATCHETS 459160 ARV/35909012 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 395.40 424305 5/3/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 260.80 459114 1674686 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 319.02 459112 1674687 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,498.87 459113 1674688 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,145.78 459111 1674689 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,811.96 459394 1674690 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9,640.09 459387 1674691 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,906.40 459388 1674692 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,096.09 459389 1674693 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,476.62 459274 1674694 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,492.62 459275 1674695 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,360.00 459276 1674696 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,564.29 459277 1674697 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 604.80 459392 1676216 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 26,177.34 424306 5/3/2018 142229 ST. CROIX ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. 3,525.00 WELL MONITORING DATA COLLECTIO 459514 991874 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 3,525.00 424307 5/3/2018 105387 ST. PAUL LINOLEUM & CARPET CO. 390.00 LABOR FOR CARPET PATCHING 459109 94833 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 390.00 424308 5/3/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 202.00 459004 21011 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 249.00 459285 21120 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 211.00 459359 21121 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 662.00 424309 5/3/2018 136030 STEWART, ROBERT J. 77.00 NAT'L LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF. 459325 03-10-2018 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 77.00 424310 5/3/2018 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. 600.96 CABLING FOR NEW CUBE 459086 20879 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 600.96 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 29 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424310 5/3/2018 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. Continued... 424311 5/3/2018 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 51.30 TIRE DISPOSAL 459191 10152824 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.30 424312 5/3/2018 142259 SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. 195.00 LIFT CERTIFICATION 459046 77275994-0001 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 213.75 LIFT CERTIFICATION 459047 77276205-0001 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 11.25 LIFT CERTIFICATION 459047 77276205-0001 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 420.00 424313 5/3/2018 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 583.54 GROW-IN FERTILIZER 459301 14423 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 583.54 424314 5/3/2018 130867 SUSSMAN, PETER 25.00 REFUND VOLUNTEER RECOG EVENT 459242 04-27-2018 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 25.00 424315 5/3/2018 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 42.81 2 DIGITAL THERMOMETERS 459470 147808009 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 648.09 CONCESSION PRODUCT 459469 147812965 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 690.90 424316 5/3/2018 104932 TAYLOR MADE 909.26 MERCHANDISE 459317 33130622 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 301.19 MERCHANDISE 459322 33136605 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 353.52 MERCHANDISE 459320 33138119 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 315.81 MERCHANDISE 459321 33139162 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,879.78 424317 5/3/2018 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 142.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 459302 4-19-2018 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 142.85 424318 5/3/2018 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 314.50 DRAFT 4/3/18 CC MINUTES 459102 M23715 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 314.50 424319 5/3/2018 134841 TRUEMAN WELTERS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424319 5/3/2018 134841 TRUEMAN WELTERS Continued... 79.58 TIRES 459189 ID53664A 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.25 NUTS 459190 ID57671 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 93.83 424320 5/3/2018 140009 U.S. KIDS GOLF 123.83 MERCHANDISE 459318 IN1260849 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 123.83 424321 5/3/2018 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 851.83 BILL RAKES TOOLS 459504 150-0036299-01 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 127.98 BILL RAKE 459502 150-0036727-01 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 335.94 PAINT 459503 1501-008197 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 439.98 BASES MARSHALL 459509 1501-008210 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,755.73 424322 5/3/2018 140954 URBAN GROWLER BREWING COMPANY LLC 264.00 459143 E-20754 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 176.00 459353 E-20755 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 440.00 424323 5/3/2018 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 94.65 459073 460232-00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 764.98 459074 460234-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 648.93 CAN LINERS, PAPER GOODS 459312 460486-00 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 19.97 HAND SOAP 459463 460486-01 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 1,528.53 424324 5/3/2018 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 35.01 FINANCE VZ MIFI 459184 9804524198 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 70.02 ADMIN VZ IPADS 459184 9804524198 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 70.02 PARKSREC VZ IPADS 459184 9804524198 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 70.02 PW ELECTRICAL VZ DATA 459184 9804524198 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 85.84 PLANNING VZ TABLETS 459184 9804524198 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 105.03 IT VZ DEVICES 459184 9804524198 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 105.03 CTS VZ IPADS 459184 9804524198 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 175.05 PARK MAINT VZ DEVICES 459184 9804524198 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 203.32 ASSESSING VZ TABLETS 459184 9804524198 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 245.07 ENGINEERING VZ DEVICES 459184 9804524198 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 490.14 INSPECTIONS VZ DEVICES 459184 9804524198 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 770.22 FIRE VZ DEVICES 459184 9804524198 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Page - 31 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424324 5/3/2018 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS Continued... 1,260.38 POLICE VZ DATA 459184 9804524198 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 35.01 BGC SUP VZ TABLETS 459184 9804524198 5422.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 50.83 MWOOLDRIDGE VZ TABLETS 459184 9804524198 5422.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 35.01 TSHIRLEY VZ IPAD 459184 9804524198 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 70.02 LIQ 50TH VZ IPADS 459184 9804524198 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 70.02 LIQ SDALE VZ IPADS 459184 9804524198 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 70.02 LIQ GVIEWVZ IPADS 459184 9804524198 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 700.20 PUBLIC WORKS VZ DATA 459184 9804524198 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 50.84 RESCUE 91 IPHONE 459140 9804582185 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 133.06 PARK MAINT VZ PHONES 459140 9804582185 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 412.81 PLANNING VZ PHONES 459140 9804582185 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 1,029.62 POLICE VZ PHONES 459140 9804582185 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 295.76 PUBLIC WORKS VZ PHONES 459140 9804582185 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 92.22 SMTF VZ PHONES 459140 9804582185 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 6,730.57 424325 5/3/2018 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY 717.56 PIV REPAIR 459486 1025-F027354 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 717.56 424326 5/3/2018 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 266.55 WIRE 459289 S001435468.001 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 266.55 424327 5/3/2018 142361 VISTA OUTDOOR SALES, LLC 244.81 459340 879077 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 244.81 424328 5/3/2018 121568 WALTER MECHANICAL INC. 62.08 6316 MILDRED AVE JOB CANCELLED 459208 162596 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 62.08 424329 5/3/2018 142351 WATCHGUARD VIDEO 18,500.00 NEW SQUAD VIDEO SOFTWARE 459064 4BOINV0003177 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 16,860.00 NEW SQUAD VIDEO SYSTEM 459065 4REINV0007121 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 99,441.00 NEW SQUAD VIDEO SYSTEM 459066 4REINV0007122 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 134,801.00 424330 5/3/2018 108597 WEEKS, DEANNA 25.00 REFUND VOLUNT RECOGN EVENT 459243 04-27-2018 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page - 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/3/2018 - Inv No 5/3/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424330 424331 5/3/2018 108597 WEEKS, DEANNA 120816 WEST COAST TRENDS INC. Continued... 5/3/2018 25.00 102.35 MERCHANDISE 459319 40497557 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 102.35 424332 5/3/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 2,754.98 459002 7179734 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.94 459040 7179735 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,804.71 459162 7180686 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 89.19 459390 7180687 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.94 459372 7180690 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,306.80 459371 7180691 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,492.69 459262 7180692 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.94 459297 7180693 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15,511.19 424333 5/3/2018 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 545.00 AUAR - TRAFFIC STUDY 459250 4-R-011179-000 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 545.00 424334 5/3/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 51.72 459404 588243262 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 26.75 459410 588265465 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 37.93 459409 588274766 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 115.98 459412 588316035 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.81 459411 588323620 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 381.08 459437 589494031 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 628.27 424335 5/3/2018 142377 ZACH, EVAN 30.48 REFUND 459240 118846 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 30.48 424336 5/3/2018 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 165.65 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES 459462 54065296 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 165.65 424337 5/3/2018 101091 ZIEGLER INC 43.52 AIR PRMYRS 459200 PC001963998 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:35 Council Check Register by GL Page- 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/3/2018 — 5/3/2018 Check # Date 424337 5/3/2018 424338 5/3/2018 Amount Supplier / Explanation 101091 ZIEGLER INC 43.52 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION 4,289.60 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 4,289.60 Continued... 459327 90021662 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,153,240.29 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 2,057,584.82 A/P ACH Payment 95,655.47 Total Payments 2,153,240.29 CITY OF EDINA 5/2/2018 11:56:44 Council Check Summary Page - 1 5/3/2018 - 5/3/2018 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 180,051.14 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 23,424.75 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 30,123.59 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 217,255.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 202.79 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 315.60 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 719.82 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 22,066.71 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 27,758.75 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 11.25 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 5,960.42 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 224.52 05800 LIQUOR FUND 239,374.29 05900 UTILITY FUND 34,147.47 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 2,602.09 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 331,323.47 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,514.53 07500 MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 5,889.36 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,029,274.74 Report Totals 2,153,240.29 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD 265.00 EASTER BUNNY 458145 AMANDA 2/27 272 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 100.59 EASTER EGGS 458585 AMANDA 3/22 273 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 43.41 EASTER CANDY 458587 AMANDA 3/23 274 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 200.00 BUNNY BREAKFAST PHOTOS 458294 AMANDA 3/23 275 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Supplier 142299 IN *KAISERCLIX - PCARD 90.40 BUILDING SUPPLIES 458889 AMY 2/27 230 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 49.00 SCHEDULING APP 458891 AMY 3/17 232 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 5.18 CREAM 458890 AMY 3/2 231 5420.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 281.05 EVENT FOOD 458892 AMY 3/22 233 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 140.71 458153 ANDERSON 3/15 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 220 Supplier 130424 MICRO CENTER - PCARD 269.95 458154 ANDERSON 3/22 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 221 Supplier 141458 SONETICS-FIRECOMFLIGHTCOM - PCARD 82.26 458146 ANDERSON 3/7 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 213 82.26 458147 ANDERSON 3/7 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 214 82.26 458148 ANDERSON 3/7 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 215 82.26 458150 ANDERSON 3/7 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 216 82.26 458149 ANDERSON 3/7 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 217 82.26 458151 ANDERSON 3/7 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 218 82.26 458152 ANDERSON 3/7 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 219 Supplier 131306 RESIDENCE INNS - PCARD 62.40 MEETING EXPENSE 458157 ANN 2/28 264 1600.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL Supplier 142298 REPUBLIC - PCARD 29.00 458649 BRIAN 3/13 164 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD Supplier R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued_ 130424 MICRO CENTER - PCARD 99.00 458648 BRIAN 3/15 165 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 35.56 COMP PLAN TREATS 458174 CARY 2/28 333 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 66.50 MEETING EXPENSES 458155 CARY 3/2 334 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 4,846.25 LEARN TO SKATE MEMBERSHIP 458182 CHAD 2/26 132 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION Supplier 139263 LEARN TO SKATE USA- PCARD 127.93 BOTTLE FILLER REPAIR 458161 CHAD 2/28 133 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 52.30 TAX ADJUSTMENT 458162 CHAD 3/16 134 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 747.30 SOUTH ZAM HOSE REEL 458163 CHAD 3/16 135 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 747.30- SOUTH ZAM HOSE REEL 458164 CHAD 3/16 136 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT Supplier 130690 WW GRAINGER - PCARD 30.26 SCREWS 458183 CHAD 3/21 137 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD 75.00 MIAMA SPRING CONFERNCE 458184 CHAD 3/22 138 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENAADMINISTRATION Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD 140.77 RUN REVIEW 458616 CRAIG 2/26 97 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 855.00 FDIC CONFERENCE 458618 CRAIG 2/28 98 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 133784 PEN*FDIC/FIRE ENGINEER-PCARD 508.60 FDIC CONFERENCE 458617 CRAIG 2/28 99 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130386 DELTAAIR - PCARD 20.00 NREMTP RECERTIFICATION 458523 CRAIG 3/10 104 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00 NREMTP RECERTIFICATION 458619 CRAIG 3/13 101 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00 NREMTP RECERTIFICATION 458521 CRAIG 3/14 102 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00 NREMTP RECERTIFICATION 458524 CRAIG 3/14 103 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20.00 NREMTP RECERTIFICATION 458522 CRAIG 3/9 100 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 136647 NATIONAL REGISTRY EMT- PCARD 114.98 UNIFORM AND EQUIP 458140 DANIEL 3/13 258 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 142297 VEDDER HOLSTERS - PCARD 998.00 458073 DAVE 2/27 256 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 142296 IN *EDUCATION & TRAINING - PCARD 330.00 458074 DAVE 3/19 257 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION Supplier 130417 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS - PCARD 21.39 SCAN CARD 458676 DAVID 2/26 184 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS Supplier 130382 OFFICE MAX - PCARD 65.00 CERT DUES MIKE R. 458135 DAVID 2/26 326 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 109.90 GUN PERMITS 458206 DAVID 2/26 61 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130666 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE- PCARD 26.43 GAS - DULUTH CONFERENCE 458210 DAVID 3/15 65 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 32.68 DULUTH CONFERENCE GAS 458211 DAVID 3/15 66 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 132305 CANAL PARK MARKET - PCARD 85.68 MEMORY CARD 458207 DAVID 3/2 62 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130394 BEST BUY- PCARD 296.14 TRAINING 458677 DAVID 3/21 185 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 142291 DELTA BY MARRIOTT - PCARD 206.96- CREDIT 458647 DAVID 3/23 67 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 206.96 DAVE LINDMAN 458646 DAVID 3/23 68 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 142278 FRG*FANATICS.COM - PCARD 95.24 CHIP READER 458208 DAVID 3/3 63 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130382 OFFICE MAX - PCARD 93.65 OFFICER INTERVIEWS 458209 DAVID 3/5 64 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130523 DAVANNI'S - PCARD 480.00 BOOKS 458137 DAVID 3/7 327 1495.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS INSPECTIONS Supplier 130651 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC - PCARD 138.29 SOCKS 458212 DAWN 2/26 226 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS Supplier 130362 TARGET- PCARD 39.00 WHEN I WORK CONTRACT 458213 DAWN 3/11 227 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCAR D 9.00 PARKING AT FOOD SHOW 458214 DAWN 3/13 228 5710.6106 MEETING EXPENSE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Supplier 142295 PARKING RAMP - PCARD 137.87 SOCKS 458187 DAWN 3/23 229 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 140.00 SAM'S CLUB MEMBERSHIP FEE 458573 DEB 2/24 346 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 11.98 GENERAL SUPPLIES 458574 DEB 2/28 347 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD 191.50 LEADS COURSE LUNCH INCLUDED 458577 DEB 3/21 350 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 15.00 LEADS COURSE LUNCH INCLUDED 458578 DEB 3/21 351 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130551 JASONS DELI - PCARD 224.98 OFFICE CHAIR REPLACEMENT SEAT 458579 DEB 3/22 352 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 142308 OFFICEREPLA - PCARD 95.00 EMAIL MARKETING 458580 DEB 3/25 353 7410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 137757 CTC*CONSTANTCONTACT.COM - PCARD 89.20 2 SMALL COUNTER HGH TABLES 458165 DEB 3/5 17 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD 163.73 STAFF MEETING-FIRSTAID 458576 DEB 3/7 349 7410.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 130523 DAVANNI'S - PCARD 22.34 GENERAL SUPPLIES 458575 DEB 3/8 348 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 50.00 MN GFOA 458281 DONALD 3/1 277 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE Supplier 133780 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT-PCARD 300.00 CPA DUES 458280 DONALD 3/21 278 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE Supplier 131242 MNSOCIETYCPAS - PCARD 1.00 UB TEST 458279 DONALD 3/3 276 5902.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE Supplier 133103 CITY OF EDINA- PCARD 34.89 RANGE CLEANING SUPPLIES 458561 GERALD 3/10 57 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 48.36 GENERAL SUPPLIES 458562 GERALD 3/13 58 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 94.76 BREAKROOM SUPPLIES 458563 GERALD 3/23 59 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD 171.38 AMMO FOR INTRO TO HANDGUNS 458564 GERALD 3/23 60 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS Supplier 133101 CABELAS - PCARD 17.97 TRASHBAGS 458560 GERALD 3/7 56 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD 124.36 GENERAL SUPPLIES 458572 GREG 3/22 139 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 24.66 458139 GREGORY 3/19 95 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS - PCARD 45.36 458141 GREGORY 3/22 96 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE-PCARD 77.37- REFUND ON ROOM 458298 GUNNAR 2/28 105 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE Supplier 131306 RESIDENCE INNS - PCARD 12.56 STORAGE CONTANERS 458299 GUNNAR 2/28 106 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 157.60 AIRFARE TO TRUCK TRAINING 458300 GUNNAR 3/1 107 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 138036 AMERICAN Al 0012360434559 - PCARD 109.20 NEW PAD LOCKS 458334 GUNNAR 3/14 123 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Supplier 132707 MINNEAPOLIS LOCK AND KEY-PCARD 62.00 SNAP LINKS 458326 GUNNAR 3/19 124 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 276.08 DOOR OPENERS 458327 GUNNAR 3/19 125 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,199.99 REPAIR RAMP PARTS 458645 GUNNAR 3/20 126 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.95 OIL CAN HOLDERS 458328 GUNNAR 3/22 127 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 23.82 SPARK PLUGS 458329 GUNNAR 3/22 128 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.96 FUEL GAUGE 458330 GUNNAR 3/22 129 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Page- 5 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit Inv No 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD 23.82 SPARK PLUGS 458331 GUNNAR 3/22 130 1553.6530 Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 19.88 ID PLATE 458332 GUNNAR 3/23 131 1553.6585 Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 354.99 VISE FOR TRUCK Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - 458301 GUNNAR 3/4 108 1553.6585 PCARD 458302 GUNNAR 3/5 109 1553.6406 23.38 ID PLATE Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD .42 SERVICE FEE 458303 GUNNAR 3/5 110 17.25 DUPLICATE TITLE 458304 GUNNAR 3/5 111 Supplier 140435 SOUTHDALE SERV CTR - PCARD 15.80 FOOD WHEN TRAINING OUT OF STAT 458305 Supplier 142281 SLIPPERY NOODLE INN - PCARD 21.75 FOOD TRANING OUT OF STATE 458307 Supplier 142283 THE ALEXANDER F AND B - PCARD 18.04 FOOD WHEN TRIANING OUT OF STAT 458306 GUNNAR 3/8 113 Supplier 142282 PEARL STREET PIZZE - PCARD 183.81 M.G. REPLACEMENT BATTERY 458323 GUNNAR 3/8 120 Supplier 134386 WILD PRAIRIE HARLEY-DAVE - PCARD 224.75 458308 GUNNAR 3/9 115 RENTAL CAR ROUTES CAR RENTAL USA - PCARD Supplier 142284 10.55 458309 GAS SPEEDWAY 06809 NOR - PCARD Supplier 142285 39.05 458310 RENTAL CAR GAS Supplier 142286 CRAZY DS - PCARD 7.61 FOOD OUT STATE TRAINING 458311 GUNNAR 3/9 118 1281.6104 Supplier 142287 STEAK-N-SHAKE#0258 Q99 - PCARD 7.72 FOOD TRAINING OUT STATE 458312 GUNNAR 3/9 119 1281.6104 Supplier 131981 ARBYS - PCARD 779.22 HOTEL STAY 458324 GUNNAR 3/9 121 1281.6104 Supplier 142288 THE ALEXANDER HOTEL - PCARD 90.00 PARKING AT HOTEL 458325 GUNNAR 3/9 122 1281.6104 Supplier 142289 ABM PARKING CITY WAY SO 8 - PCARD 53.00 HEADSET REPAIR 458559 JASON 2/27 78 1401.6203 Supplier 137876 SAFARILAND LLC - PCARD 206.24 K9 HANDLER CONFERENCE HOTEL 458582 JASON 2/27 79 206.24 K9 HANDLER CONFERENCE 458583 JASON 2/27 80 Supplier 131018 COUNTRY INN - PCARD 142.97 SNOW REMOVAL TOOLS 458185 JASON 2/28 296 5511.6406 Continued... REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES ACCESSORIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GUNNAR 3/7 112 1553.6406 1553.6406 1281.6104 GUNNAR 3/7 114 GUNNAR 3/9 116 GUNNAR 3/9 117 1281.6104 1281.6104 1553.6530 1281.6104 1281.6104 1281.6104 1400.6104 1400.6104 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TRAINING TRAINING TRAINING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TRAINING TRAINING TRAINING TRAINING TRAINING TRAINING TRAINING EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 7.52 SNOW REMOVAL TOOLS 458185 JASON 2/28 296 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD 39.87 SNOW EQUIPMENT 458558 JASON 2/28 297 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2.10 SNOW EQUIPMENT 458558 JASON 2/28 297 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS Supplier 130418 NORTHERN TOOL - PCARD 15.00 NREMT: MKI ROFIDAL 458586 JASON 3/1 81 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 136647 NATIONAL REGISTRY EMT- PCARD 120.00 USPCA REGION 12 PD1 YOUNG 458590 JASON 3/12 88 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD 250.00 GLOCK ARMORER SCHOOL 458504 JASON 3/14 89 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 131608 GLOCK PROFESSIONAL INC - PCARD 650.00 FBI LEEDA ELI THOLEN 458506 JASON 3/14 90 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 650.00 FBI LEEDA CLI THOLEN 458507 JASON 3/14 91 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 140075 FBI LEEDA INC - PCARD 229.00 PENMAN BULLETPROOF GROSSMAN 458592 JASON 3/22 92 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130748 CALIBRE PRESS - PCARD 250.00 GLOCK ARMORER SCHOOL 458501 JASON 3/5 82 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 GLOCK ARMORER SCHOOL 458502 JASON 3/5 83 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 GLOCK ARMORER SCHOOL 458503 JASON 3/5 84 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 131608 GLOCK PROFESSIONAL INC - PCARD 300.00 SCHULTZ BCA MISSING PERSONS 458588 JASON 3/5 85 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD 650.00 FBI LEEDA ELI WHITE 458505 JASON 3/6 86 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 140075 FBI LEEDA INC - PCARD 58.23 MISC. SUPPLIES 458557 JASON 3/7 298 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3.06 MISC. SUPPLIES 458557 JASON 3/7 298 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD 125.00 BCA HOTEL INTERDICTION BOERGER 458589 JASON 3/7 87 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD 161.99 458084 JEFF 3/19 311 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH Supplier 133136 THERMOWORKS INC - PCARD 61.50 458096 JEFF 3/20 312 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH Supplier 142304 DEP OF AG REGISTRATION AM - PCARD 109.61 REPAIRS - ST. 1 458614 JEFFREY 3/1 299 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD 1,500.00 CHAIRS 458613 JEFFREY 3/2 300 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 142301 IN *FIRESTATIONFURNITURE. - PCARD 32.24 REPAIRS - ST. 1 458612 JEFFREY 3/5 301 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 32.24- REPAIRS - ST. 1 458293 JEFFREY 3/6 302 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 — 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 20.00 NREMTP RECERTIFICATION 458610 JEFFREY 3/7 303 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 136647 NATIONAL REGISTRY EMT- PCARD 102.69 REPAIRS - ST. 1 458615 JEFFREY 3/7 304 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 139349 POKORNY COMPANY- PCARD 100.00 ELEVATOR LICENSE 458611 JEFFREY 3/9 305 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD 76.50 NORTHERN LIGHTS AWARD ENTRY 458041 JENNIFER 2/26 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 140 Supplier 130420 MAGC - PCARD 53.75 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - CARON 458064 JENNIFER 2/27 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 141 Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD 399.00 ARCHIVESOCIAL SUBSCRIPTION 458045 JENNIFER 2/27 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 142 Supplier 136288 ARCHIVESOCIAL.COM - PCARD 53.06 PROMOTED FACEBOOK POSTS 458296 JENNIFER 2/28 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 143 2.67 PROMOTED FACEBOOK POSTS 458297 JENNIFER 2/28 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 144 14.81 NORTH RAMP EXP - DESIGN 458851 JENNIFER 2/28 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 145 35.19 NORTH RAMP EXP - DESIGN 458845 JENNIFER 2/28 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 146 Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD 183.60 MAILCHIMP SUBSCRIPTION 458043 JENNIFER 3/10 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 152 Supplier 135752 MAILCHIMP - PCARD 53.75 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - BENNEROTT 458063 JENNIFER 3/13 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 153 53.75 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - EIDSNESS 458490 JENNIFER 3/14 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 154 Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD 29.95 FRESHBOOKS SUBSCRIPTION 458046 JENNIFER 3/17 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 156 Supplier 132480 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS - PCARD 58.00 HOT JAR SUBSCRIPTION 458343 JENNIFER 3/17 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 157 Supplier 141643 HOTJAR - PCARD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Page- 8 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 25.00 SEASON PASS FB POST 458922 JENNIFER 3/19 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 155 Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD 60.00 NORTH RAMP EXP - DESIGN 458846 JENNIFER 3/20 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 158 60.00 NORTH RAMP EXP - DESIGN 458847 JENNIFER 3/20 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 159 Supplier 130552 ISTOCK INTERNATIONAL- PCARD 87.23 MAILCHIMP EMAIL CLEAN 458362 JENNIFER 3/24 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 160 Supplier 136291 BRITEVERIFY - PCARD 240.00 NORTHERN LIGHTS AWARD ENTRIES 458042 JENNIFER 3/6 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 147 Supplier 140304 MINNESOTAASSOCIATION OF - PCARD 329.00 GLASSES FOR JAKE MILLER 458047 JENNIFER 3/7 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 148 Supplier 142290 ENCHROMA INC - PCARD 306.00 NORTHERN LIGHTS AWARD ENTRIES 458062 JENNIFER 3/8 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 149 Supplier 130420 MAGC - PCARD 26.02 DRYMOUNTING 458044 JENNIFER 3/9 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 150 Supplier 135879 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING - PCARD 150.00 VALUES VIPS GIFT CARDS 458014 JENNIFER 3/9 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 151 Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD 32.24 DRILL BIT 458581 JOHN 3/14 77 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE Supplier 132010 ROCKLER WOOD - PCARD 48.61 MUCK BUCKETS X2 458584 JOHN 3/15 76 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE Supplier 142279 TRACTOR SUPPLY #1156 - PCARD 1,502.88 CONFERENCE ROOM TABLE 458378 JOSEPH 2/26 306 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Supplier 142302 SOS OFFICE FURNITURE - PCARD 227.60 CONFERENCE ROOM COAT RACK 458365 JOSEPH 3/12 310 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Supplier 142303 AVADENALICOM - PCARD 537.52 CONFERENCE ROOM CHAIRS 458363 JOSEPH 3/6 307 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 430.01 CONFERENCE ROOM CHAIRS 458364 JOSEPH 3/6 308 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130892 STAPLES - PCARD 82.64 DOME COGS - CANDY BARS 458366 JOSEPH 3/9 309 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 68.24 458794 JOSHUA 2/28 265 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 68.24 458794 JOSHUA 2/28 265 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 68.24 458794 JOSHUA 2/28 265 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 98.45 458795 JOSHUA 2/28 266 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 98.45 458795 JOSHUA 2/28 266 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 98.45 458795 JOSHUA 2/28 266 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD 334.05 458497 JOSHUA 3/12268 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 334.05 458497 JOSHUA 3/12 268 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 334.05 458497 JOSHUA 3/12 268 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY Supplier 141664 LIGHTSPEED RETAIL INC. - PCARD 75.00 458498 JOSHUA 3/13 269 5820.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 50TH STREET GENERAL 75.00 458498 JOSHUA 3/13 269 5840.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 75.00 458498 JOSHUA 3/13 269 5860.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL Supplier 132000 MN LICENSED BEVERAGE - PCARD 26.33 458375 JOSHUA 3/21 270 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH ST SELLING 26.33 458375 JOSHUA 3/21 270 5862.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON SELLING 26.34 458375 JOSHUA 3/21 270 5842.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS YORK SELLING Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 171.35- 458374 JOSHUA 3/22 271 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 171.35 458373 JOSHUA 3/8 267 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE-PCARD 80.00 CANVAS FOR PHOTO WINNER 458160 KATHARINE 3/16 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 263 Supplier 141291 CANVASPOP - PCARD 53.75 ADOBE 458159 KATHARINE 3/17 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 262 Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD 9.99 ICONS 458186 KATHARINE 3/5 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 259 Supplier 138384 NOUNPROJECT.COM - PCARD 29.00 EDINA LIQUOR IMAGES FOR BOX BA 458158 KATHARINE 3/6 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 260 Supplier 139339 GETTY IMAGES - PCARD 26.40 NORTH RAMP EXP - DESIGN 458848 KATHARINE 3/9 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 261 Supplier 130552 !STOCK INTERNATIONAL- PCARD 7.48 COFFEE 458565 KATHRYN 3/1 69 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 29.99 OFFICE LABELS 458565 KATHRYN 3/1 69 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 26.95 OFFICE LABELS 458566 KATHRYN 3/1 70 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 14.45 OFFICE LABELS 458567 KATHRYN 3/1 71 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 29.84 INTRO TO HANDGUNS SNACKS 458570 KATHRYN 3/12 74 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS - PCARD 27.95 INTRO TO HANDGUNS SNACKS 458571 KATHRYN 3/15 75 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 8.98 OFFICE LABELS 458568 KATHRYN 3/2 72 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 12.98 OFFICE LABELS 458569 KATHRYN 3/2 73 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 277.50 HARASSMENT PREVENTION VIDEO 458345 KELLY 3/14 212 1170.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES HUMAN RESOURCES Supplier 142294 MEDIA PARTNERS CORP - PCARD 3,469.71- US BANK REBATE 458121 KYLE 2/27 354 1001.8070 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE GENERAL FUND REVENUES Supplier 133796 US BANK - PCARD 89.39 LAURIE'S RETIREMENT 458114 KYLE 2/28 192 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 29.99 IDENTITY MONITORING 458115 KYLE 3/1 193 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE Supplier 138122 IDENTITY GUARD - PCARD 24.45 PAYPAL 458119 KYLE 3/2 194 1160.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES FINANCE Supplier 130375 PAY FLOW PRO - PCARD 305.00 GFOA MEMBERSHIP - DON AND KYLE 458116 KYLE 3/20 195 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE Supplier 133585 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICE - PCARD 620.00 CPE COURSES - KYLE 458118 KYLE 3/23 196 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE Supplier 131242 MNSOCIETYCPAS - PCARD 520.00 2018 MCMA CONF 458192 LISA 3/21 235 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION Supplier 131609 GTS EDUCATIONAL EVE - PCARD 10.00 VOLUNTEERS-MAR 458667 LISA 3/3 234 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION Supplier 138626 YOUCANBOOKME - PCARD 125.04 POPCORN MACHINE 458654 LUTHER 3/21 342 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL Supplier 142307 EPIC EVENT RENTAL - PCARD 340.00 JOHN HARRIS CLASS 458655 LUTHER 3/21 343 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 190.00 458653 LUTHER 3/6 341 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 3.00 PARKING FOR MTG 458546 MARY 2/28 328 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 142305 PK 2069 7 CORNERS - PCARD 200.00 EXEC WMN DUES 458543 MARY 3/19 329 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 142306 SQ *EXECUTIVE WOMENS GOLF - PCARD 59.90 BUNNY BREAKFAST 458792 MARY 3/22 330 5420.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CLUB HOUSE 121.44 DOME EVENT 458792 MARY 3/22 330 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 — 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD 23.64 OFFICCE SUPPLIES 458544 MARY 3/24 331 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130892 STAPLES - PCARD 20.00 IPAD SERVICE 458545 MARY 3/25 332 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130880 VERIZON WIRELESS - PCARD 98.70 CRAFT SUPPLIES 459533 MICHAEL 3/12 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 339 Supplier 133387 BLICK ART - PCARD 18.47 458813 MICHAEL 3/17 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 320 Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 57.92 458810 MICHAEL 3/2 318 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 4.99 458811 MICHAEL 3/20 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 321 Supplier 130428 GOOGLE - PCARD 28.17 SEE ATTACHMENT 459534 MICHAEL 3/21 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 340 Supplier 134579 SAVOY PIZZA- PCARD 10.82 458808 MICHAEL 3/23 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 322 Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 8.05 458807 MICHAEL 3/24 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 324 Supplier 130750 WALGREENS - PCARD 14.44 458803 MICHAEL 3/25 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 323 Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD 7.99- 458495 MICHAEL 3/25 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 325 7.99 458495 MICHAEL 3/25 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 325 7.99 458495 MICHAEL 3/25 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 325 Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 8.89 458812 MICHAEL 3/3 317 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET Supplier 131250 LUNDS - PCARD 19.35 458809 MICHAEL 3/9 319 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Page- 12 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 200.00 NORMANDALE PARK D MPCA PERMIT 458188 MILLNER 2/27 01446.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Normandale Park D 335 200.00 BREDESEN PARK E MPCA PERMIT 458188 MILLNER 2/27 01450.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Bredesen Park A 335 400.00- CHOWEN D MPCA PERMIT REFUND 458189 MILLNER 3/1 336 01439.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Chowen Park D Supplier 131625 POLLUTION CONTROLAGENCY- PCARD 604.00 MARK APA MEMBERSHIP DUES 458190 MILLNER 3/16 1262.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS TRANSPORTATION 337 Supplier 134075 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC - PCARD 130.00 CHARLIE PLANNING TRAINING 458191 MILLNER 3/20 1263.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENVIRONMENT 338 Supplier 139922 U OF M CONTLEARNING - PCARD 765.00 MRWA CONFERENCE 458176 NATHAN 2/27 286 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 142137 PSN*MINNESOTA RWA MN - PCARD 415.00 MPCA CONFERENCE 458180 NATHAN 3/12 290 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 55.00 TESTING 458549 NATHAN 3/12 291 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 390.00 MPCA CONFERENCE 458548 NATHAN 3/13 292 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 415.00 MPCA CONFERENCE 458181 NATHAN 3/13 293 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 131625 POLLUTION CONTROLAGENCY- PCARD 11.22 ALCOHOL WIPES 458175 NATHAN 3/16 294 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT Supplier 130750 WALGREENS - PCARD 415.00 MPCA CONFERENCE 458170 NATHAN 3/16 295 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 131625 POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY - PCARD 523.87 TOOLS 458177 NATHAN 3/5 287 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION Supplier 130534 ACME TOOLS - PCARD 390.00 MPCA CONFERENCE 458178 NATHAN 3/7 288 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 390.00 MPCA CONFERENCE 458179 NATHAN 3/9 289 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 131625 POLLUTION CONTROLAGENCY - PCARD 272.52 ART WALL REPLACEMENT PARTS 458066 NICOLE 3/14 93 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 17.53- REFUND-TAX EXEMPT PURCHASE 458067 NICOLE 3/15 94 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS Supplier 142280 WALKER DISPLAY INC - PCARD 324.30 HUMID PERMIT-EDINA 458113 NOAH 3/14 282 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING Supplier 133103 CITY OF EDINA- PCARD 179.00 JOHN S - BUILDING FOOT SUPPORT 458117 NOAH 3/17 283 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL Supplier 142300 JUMPSPORT.INC/WURF.COM - PCARD 77.50 HUMID PERMIT- EDINA 458072 NOAH 3/2 279 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING Supplier 140174 EDINA INSPECTIONS DEPT - PCARD 36.00 HUMID ELEC PERMIT 458120 NOAH 3/20 284 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Page - 13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 23.61 MOTHER'S ROOM WINDOW BLOCK 458123 NOAH 3/22 285 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING Supplier 130389 MICHAELS - PCARD 4.00 GRANT WRITE CLASS PARKING 456076 NOAH 3/8 280 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 4.00 GRANT WRITE TRAINING PARKING 458496 NOAH 3/9 281 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING Supplier 130370 U OF M PARKING - PCARD 7.50- CC MACHINE TEST REFUND 458166 PATRICIA 2/27 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 180 7.50 CC MACHINE TEST 458167 PATRICIA 2/27 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 181 Supplier 135746 EDINBOROUGH PARK - PCARD 27.49 METER RENTAL 458169 PATRICIA 3/13 5710.6235 POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 183 Supplier 130400 PITNEY BOWES - PCARD 126.00 AED BATTERY 458168 PATRICIA 3/9 5710.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 182 Supplier 131016 AED SUPERSTORE - PCARD 5.90 MN-TF1 HELMET MARKING 458171 PETER 3/1 222 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION Supplier 132882 ACE HARDWARE - PCARD 9.65 MN-TF1 POSTAGE 458143 PETER 3/21 224 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION Supplier 133727 SQ*POSTAL DISPATCH BUSIN-PCARD 132.90 MN-TF1: VERIZON PAYMENT 458144 PETER 3/21 225 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION Supplier 140194 VZWRLSS*IVR VB - PCARD 266.71 MN-TF1: UQT3 FOOD 458142 PETER 3/3 223 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION Supplier 141459 PIZZA MAN - PCARD 195.86 IAAI CONFERENCE 458602 RICK 3/23 188 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 195.86 IAAI CONFERENCE 458603 RICK 3/23 189 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 195.86 IAAI CONFERENCE 458604 RICK 3/23 190 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 195.86 IAAI CONFERENCE 458605 RICK 3/23 191 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130654 HOLIDAY INN - PCARD 26.06 DUES 2018 458202 RICK 3/5 186 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 304.12 IAAI CONFERENCE 458156 RICK 3/5 187 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD 267.00 REAL ESTATE SUMMIT 458674 ROBERT 3/12 54 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING Supplier 140298 REAL ESTATE SUMMITS - PCARD 159.96 TABLET CASES 458675 ROBERT 3/23 55 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING Supplier 130424 MICRO CENTER - PCARD 119.00 2ND Q MLS DUES 458670 ROBERT 3/5 50 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING Supplier 131920 REALTOR ASSOCIATION - PCARD 545.00 PWC REAL ESTATE 458671 ROBERT 3/6 51 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING Supplier R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Page- 14 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD 131919 PRICE WATERHOUSE COOPER - PCARD Continued..., 295.00 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 458673 ROBERT 3/7 53 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING Supplier 136926 FINANCE AND COMMERCE - PCARD 58.97 458672 ROBERT 3/8 52 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 806.38 VMWARE UPGRADES 458805 RYAN 3/13 163 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS Supplier 136299 DRI*VMWARE - PCARD 182.42 IT SOFTWARE 458802 RYAN 3/2 161 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS Supplier 133134 TECHSMITH CORPORATION - PCARD 40.00 SHAREFILE DAVE AND JULIE 458804 RYAN 3/8 162 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.64 SHAREFILE 458804 RYAN 3/8 162 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS Supplier 139266 NLI*SHAREFILE - PCARD 40.00 NLC REGIST-B.STEWART 458196 SCOTT 2/26 18 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 80.00 NLC REGIST-NEAL/CHANTE 458196 SCOTT 2/26 18 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 133236 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES - PCARD 100.00 FACEBOOK POSTS 458621 SCOTT 2/28 166 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD 50.54 NEAL/MAYOR/MONDALE-ATOMICDATA 458197 SCOTT 2/28 19 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130368 EDINA GRILL - PCARD 570.00 NATOA 2018 MEMBERSHIP 458627 SCOTT 3/1 167 1132.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CABLE COMMISSION Supplier 140180 NATOA- PCARD 857.55 NLC HOTEL-STEWART 458201 SCOTT 3/10 23 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 1,373.00 NLC HOTEL- STAUNTON 458172 SCOTT 3/10 24 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 140293 THE CHURCHILL HOTEL - PCARD 160.00 NLC REGIST-STEWART 458593 SCOTT 3/10 26 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 133236 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES - PCARD 11.52 NLC - TAXI - NEAL 458594 SCOTT 3/11 27 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 142272 SQ *GRAND CAB COMPANY - PCARD 127.88 INDIANAPOLIS TRIP-MAYOR 458595 SCOTT 3/11 28 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 127.88 INDIANAPOLIS TRIP-NEAL 458595 SCOTT 3/11 28 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130683 HOTELS.COM - PCARD 891.99 NLC HOTEL - FISCHER 458599 SCOTT 3/11 30 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 140293 THE CHURCHILL HOTEL - PCARD 28.09 NLC - MEAL- NEAL 458600 SCOTT 3/11 32 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 140291 NEW BIG WONG RESTAUR - PCARD 69.00 NEW LAV MIC FOR CHAMBERS AN 458639 SCOTT 3/12 173 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT Supplier 131597 B & H PHOTO-VIDEO.COM - PCARD 252.08 NLC DINNER-NEAL/CHANTE 458598 SCOTT 3/12 31 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 378.11 NLC DINNER-BOB/MIKE/KEVIN 458598 SCOTT 3/12 31 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 15 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD 142273 THE HAMILTON - PCARD 13.28 NLC - TAXI - NEAL 458601 SCOTT 3/12 33 1120.6106 Supplier 142274 SQ *UVC - PCARD 102.95 NLC - MEAL-STEWART/FISCHER 458620 SCOTT 3/12 34 1100.6106 102.95 NLC - MEAL-NEAL/CHANTE 458620 SCOTT 3/12 34 1100.6106 Supplier 140289 SETTE OSTERIA - PCARD 24.16 NLC - TAXI - NEAL 458622 SCOTT 3/13 35 1120.6106 Supplier 142274 SQ *UVC - PCARD 24.84 NLC - TAXI - NEAL 458623 SCOTT 3/13 36 1120.6106 Supplier 142275 SQ *ASAMENEW GEBEYFI LI - PCARD 27.76 NLC - TAXI - NEAL 458624 SCOTT 3/13 37 1120.6106 30.02 NLC - TAXI - NEAL 458625 SCOTT 3/13 38 1120.6106 Supplier 142274 SQ *UVC - PCARD 12.91 NLC - MEAL- NEAL 458628 SCOTT 3/13 40 1120.6106 1,120.44 NLC - HOTEL- CHANTE 458629 SCOTT 3/13 41 1120.6106 Supplier 140293 THE CHURCHILL HOTEL - PCARD 29.38 NLC - TAXI - NEAL 458597 SCOTT 3/13 43 1120.6106 Supplier 140728 TAXI SVC WASHINGTON - PCARD 12.95 NLC - MEAL- STEWART 458626 SCOTT 3/14 39 1100.6106 12.95 NLC - MEAL - NEAL 458626 SCOTT 3/14 39 1120.6106 Supplier 142276 CAVA MEZZE MEDITERRANE - PCARD 23.00 MPLS BISNOW EVENT 458630 SCOTT 3/14 42 1120.6106 Supplier 141460 INTERSTATE PARKING 2056 - PCARD 110.94 HEADPHONE REPLACEMENT PARTS 458640 SCOTT 3/16 174 421130.6710 Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 33.95 BREAKFAST MTG-BRINDLE/NEAL 458633 SCOTT 3/16 44 1120.6106 Supplier 135373 HILLTOP PUB AND RESTAURANT - PCARD 520.00 MCMA CONFERENCE-NEAL 459779 SCOTT 3/16 45 1120.6104 Supplier 131609 GTS EDUCATIONAL EVE - PCARD 130.00 NATOAAWARD ENTRIES 458643 SCOTT 3/19 176 1130.6105 Supplier 140180 NATOA- PCARD 195.00 MCMA REGISTRATION-CHANTE 458637 SCOTT 3/19 46 1120.6106 Supplier 131609 GTS EDUCATIONAL EVE - PCARD 181.00 NLC FLIGHT-STEWART 458198 SCOTT 3/2 20 1100.6106 Supplier 130386 DELTA AIR - PCARD 74.97- RETURN OF HEADPHONE PARTS 458641 SCOTT 3/20 175 421130.6710 89.85 HEADPHONE REPLACEMENT PARTS 458642 SCOTT 3/20 177 421130.6710 Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 65.37 MEAL - MAYOR/CITY MANAGER 458657 SCOTT 3/20 47 1120.6106 Supplier Check # Date 20180410 4/10/2018 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT ADMINISTRATION Continued-. MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEETING EXPENSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS MEETING EXPENSE MEETING EXPENSE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEETING EXPENSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Page- 16 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/1012018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 142277 COCONUT THAI RESTAURANT - PCARD 53.75 CREATIVE CLOUD 458634 SCOTT 3/22 178 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD 248.34 MCMA CONF LODGING-CHANTE 458659 SCOTT 3/22 48 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 215.40 MCMA CONF LODGING-NEAL 458656 SCOTT 3/22 49 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130415 GRAND VIEW LODGE - PCARD 15.00 MACTA EVENT 458644 SCOTT 3/23 179 1132.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CABLE COMMISSION Supplier 134365 MACTA- PCARD 120.50 NLC FLIGHT-CHANTE 458199 SCOTT 3/5 21 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 131318 SOUTHWEST- PCARD 53.75 CREATIVE CLOUD 458631 SCOTT 3/6 168 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD 40.00- NLC REGIST-STEWART 458200 SCOTT 3/6 22 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 133236 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES - PCARD 53.75 CREATIVE CLOUD 458632 SCOTT 3/7 169 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD 242.00 NEW MIC FOR COMMUNITY ROOM 458635 SCOTT 3/7 170 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT Supplier 131597 B & H PHOTO-VIDEO.COM - PCARD 76.50 MAGC ENTRY 458636 SCOTT 3/8 171 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 76.50 MAGC ENTRY 458638 SCOTT 3/9 172 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS Supplier 130420 MAGC - PCARD 17.00 NLC - METRORAIL 458173 SCOTT 3/9 25 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 142271 METRO 005-DUPONT CIRCLE S - PCARD 29.09 NLC- TAXI - NEAL 458596 SCOTT 3/9 29 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 140728 TAXI SVC WASHINGTON - PCARD 153.00 SWC PRECONF-TARA 458660 SHARON 2/26 197 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD 88.00 VOLUNTEER RECORDS - FEB 458662 SHARON 2/27 199 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION Supplier 134155 VOLGISTICS INC - PCARD 50.00 CITY CLERK TRAINING-SHARON 458661 SHARON 2/28 198 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION Supplier 139859 MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES - PCARD 50.00 WORKFORCE/AFFORDHOUSING-NEAL 458665 SHARON 3/16 206 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION Supplier 142292 MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL CHAM - PCARD 475.00 CITY CLERK INSTITUTE - SHARON 458664 SHARON 3/17 205 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION Supplier 139859 MINNESOTA STATE COLLEGES - PCARD 72.17 R&E TASKFORCE MAR 19 458666 SHARON 3/19 207 1500.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CONTINGENCIES Supplier 130523 DAVANNI'S - PCARD 236.23 COUNCIL MEALS - MAR 20 458668 SHARON 3/20 208 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 142293 44 PIADA EDINA - PCARD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page- 17 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 349.28 B/C ALL-CHAIR ANNUAL MEETING 458195 SHARON 3/21 209 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 135150 LEEANN CHIN - PCARD 19.31 LIQUOR STORE STAFF EVENT 458194 SHARON 3/22 210 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD 3.98 WATER 458193 SHARON 3/24 211 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 11.76 B/C ANNUAL RECOGNITION 458656 SHARON 3/3 200 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 17.64 COUNCIL WATER 458656 SHARON 3/3 200 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD 20.39 B/C ANNUAL MEETING 458663 SHARON 3/4 201 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS - PCARD 136.44 COUNCIL MEALS - MAR 6 458652 SHARON 3/5 202 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 77.89 COUNCIL MEALS - MAR 6 458651 SHARON 3/5 203 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 13.97- COUNCIL FOOD -MAR 6 458650 SHARON 3/6 204 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL Supplier 130374 D BRIAN'S DELI - PCARD .39 LICENSE TABS 458068 SUSAN 3/13 344 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.00 LICENSE TABS 458069 SUSAN 3/13 345 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Supplier 140435 SOUTHDALE SERV CTR - PCARD 48.66- FRAUD CREDIT 458540 TOM 1/1 239 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 16.00- FRAUD CREDIT 458541 TOM 1/1 240 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 45.75- FRAUD CREDIT 458538 TOM 12/31 237 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 23.71- FRAUD CREDIT 458539 TOM 12/31 238 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Supplier 140448 UBER US - PCARD 514.70 OAK FOR BOARDROOM 458376 TOM 2/21 236 5420.6577 LUMBER CLUB HOUSE 49.96 MISC ITEMS 458313 TOM 3/1 1 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 150.00 MGCSA BRYAN 458542 TOM 3/1 241 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD 19.99 ITUNES APP 458609 TOM 3/11 316 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 134734 APL*ITUNES.COM/BILL - PCARD 199.95 TIRES 458333 TOM 3/11 5 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 142268 GOLFCARTTIRESUPPLY.COM - PCARD 478.70 WELLNESS EVENT 458322 TOM 3/13 6 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES Supplier 130679 PINSTRIPES - PCARD 180.68 TRELLIS REPAIR SUPPLIES 458318 TOM 3/14 7 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 150.12 PAINT 458532 TOM 3/15 250 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD 133.05 GENERAL SUPPLIES 458319 TOM 3/15 8 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 22.50 PICTURE HANGER 458531 TOM 3/16 249 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Page- 18 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued... 63.45 OUTLET 458533 TOM 3/17 251 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 5.00 LEVITON QUICK POR T 458534 TOM 3/17 252 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD 39.99 OUTLET 458535 TOM 3/17 253 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 29.00 SCHEDULING APP 458339 TOM 3/17 90 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD 149.07 PAINTAND PAINTING SUPPLIES 458320 TOM 3/19 10 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 58.13 CLEANING 458377 TOM 3/2 242 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD 360.74 BOARDROOM OUTLETS 458525 TOM 3/2 243 5420.6577 LUMBER CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 150.00 CLIA LAB FEE 458606 TOM 3/2 313 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 138191 CLIA LABORATORY PROGRAM - PCARD 79.89 PAINTING SUPPLIES 458321 TOM 3/20 11 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 500.00 COUNTERTOP REPAIR 458317 TOM 3/20 12 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD 30.88 OAK 458536 TOM 3/20 254 5420.6577 LUMBER CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 107.51 SCREEN 458335 TOM 3/21 13 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD 199.98 SAW EXTENSION 458337 TOM 3/21 15 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 142270 RWD*WORX YARD TOOLS - PCARD 158.74 SPRAYER ATTACHMENT 458338 TOM 3/21 16 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 140175 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS - PCARD 117.99 DOG WASTE BAGS 458336 TOM 3/22 14 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 142269 DOG WASTE DEPOT - PCARD 155.29 PLYWOOD 458537 TOM 3/23 255 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 59.99 ITUNES APP 458607 TOM 3/3 314 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39.97 ITUNES APP 458608 TOM 3/4 315 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Supplier 134734 APL*ITUNES.COM/BILL - PCARD 195.00 GCSAA BRYAN 458526 TOM 3/6 244 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION Supplier 131479 GCSAA- PCARD 49.84 OAK TRIM 458527 TOM 3/8 245 5420.6577 LUMBER CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:41 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 4/10/2018 — 4/10/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20180410 4/10/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued-. 599.27 FLOOR FINISH, SUPPLIES 458316 TOM 3/8 4 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD 105.65 TIRES 458314 TOM 3/9 2 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 138123 JACKS SMALL ENGINES & GEN - PCARD 18.27 OAK 458528 TOM 3/9 246 5420.6577 LUMBER CLUB HOUSE 62.54 OAK 458529 TOM 3/9 247 5420.6577 LUMBER CLUB HOUSE Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD 10.28 CAULK 458530 TOM 3/9 248 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 125.00 COUNTERTOP RESURFACING 458315 TOM 3/9 3 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD 56,950.03 56,950.03 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks EFT Payments Total Payments 56,950.03 56,950.03 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 33,006.68 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 436.82 05100 ART CENTER FUND 126.87 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 82.64 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 25.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 5,391.46 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 5,244.88 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 140.61 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 477.65 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 2,735.74 05800 LIQUOR FUND 2,056.16 05900 UTILITY FUND 5,099.09 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,514.87 07500 MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 415.16 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 196.40 Report Totals 56,950.03 CITY OF EDINA 5/8/2018 11:38:45 Council Check Summary Page - 1 4/10/2018 - 4/10/2018 Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.C . To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eques t F or P urchas e F rom:G unnar Kaasa, Equipment O perations S upervisor Item Activity: Subject:R equest F or P urc hase: 2018 F ord F 150 with Ecoboost Engine Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Authorize purchase of a 2018 Ford F150 pickup with E coboost engine to replace 70-292, a 2008 Chevy 1500 pickup with 82,221 miles, 6,621 engine hours and is rusting out. I N TR O D U C TI O N: Our new equipment replacement scoring methodology uses six performance and cost variables including age, usage, type of service, condition, repair costs, and reliability. Replacement qualification scores are 23 for all sedans and light trucks, and 28 for heavy duty vehicles and off road equipment whose gross weight rating exceeds 10,500. T he higher the score, the higher the need to replace the vehicle. In other words, we will not replace a light duty vehicle that does not have a minimum score of 23. T his piece of equipment has a score of 26. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Request for Purchase: 2018 F150 Ecoboost City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: 05/15/2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Gunnar Kaasa, Equipment Operation Supervisor Subject: Request for Purchase: 2018 Ford F150 with Ecoboost Engine Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☒State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Midway Ford Service one. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: 03/30/2018 06/02/2018 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Midway Ford 2777 N Snelling Ave Roseville MN 55113 State Contract #74464 Service one 45 east HWY 61 Esko MN 55733 State # 765-(5) $27,369.93 $7,244.00 $34,613.93 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact • This funding source is allocated in our Utility equipment replacement program. The truck is replacing a 70-292, 2008 Chevy 1500 pickup with 82,221 miles, in our fleet. It will be serviced by our fleet maintenance operation division, and utilized by the Utility division within the Public Works department. Environmental Impact • This 2018 Ford F150 with Ecoboost engine will be replacing a 2008 Chevrolet 1500 pickup (70-292). This Ford F150 with Ecoboost engine has estimated MPG of 21 with a carbon foot print of 14,192 pounds in its lifetime use of 10 years. The vehicle it will replace has an EPG of 18 MPG and a carbon foot print of 16,557 pounds. The 2008 Chevy 1500 pickup is a Tier 2 Phase 2 of Government CO2 emissions reductions and the 2018 Ford F150 is Tier 2 phase 3 of government reductions for CO2. Community Impact • This piece of equipment will be utilized by Public Works Utilities department to perform locating of water and sewer lines and with repair and servicing of the City’s filtering and pumping stations. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.D. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eques t F or P urchas e F rom:Brian O ls on, Direc tor of P ublic Works Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: S C ADA P LC and P anel View Upgrades Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion to award quote for S C AD A P L C and P anel View Upgrades to E E S C O in the amount of $36,937.20. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee attached staff report. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Request for Purchase: SCADA PLC and Panel View Upgrade City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: May 15, 2018 To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL From: Brian Olson, Director of Public Works Subject: Request for Purchase: SCADA PLC and Panel View Upgrades Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget EESCO $36,937.20 This purchase will move forward a 2018 Capital Improvement Project for materials and programming of Programmable Logic Computers (PLC) that run the City’s individual wells, treatment plants and lift stations, and provide the data relayed through the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system to allow centralized remote control and monitoring of the utility infrastructure. Current equipment is approaching or is at the end of expected life and will be unsupported. PanelViews (PV) are touch screen interfaces that allow for onsite control and monitoring. Current model is approaching or is at the end of expected life and is not fully compatible with PLC upgrades. This is Phase II of a two phase upgrade. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: April 26, 2018 May 26, 2018 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: EESCO Spring Lake Engineering Werner Electric $36,937.20 $38,508.32 $46,037.12 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact • Funding Source – Water Utility Fund • Replacement of existing hardware • Negligible cost of disposal Environmental Impact • Energy – Improved efficiency of new hardware has lower electrical demand • Water – n/a • Material Waste – n/a • Natural Resources – n/a • Carbon – n/a • Certification(s) – n/a Community Impact • PLC and PVs have a 10+ year life expectancy Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.E. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eques t F or P urchas e F rom:C had A. Millner, P E, Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: Engineering S ervic es for Lift S tation #6 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve Engineering S ervices with B arr Engineering C ompany. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee detailed R equest for P urchase AT TAC HME N T S: Description Request for Purchase Lift Station 6 Propos al from BARR City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: May 15, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Subject: Engineering Services for Lift Station #6 Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☒Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: May 7, 2018 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: BARR Engineering Co. $35,000.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: BARR Engineering Co. $35,000.00 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact Staff had concerns with the structural integrity of the walls near the wet well of lift station #6. BARR Engineering was called to conduct an inspection of the facility since they had previously assisted the city with this lift station. Inspections included not only the walls but also the overall condition of the 60+ year old station. The inspection noted no eminent concerns at this time but improvements are needed to ensure the long-term operation. The project will be funded from the sanitary sewer fund. Environmental Impact Understanding the integrity of the lift station will ensure continued operations of a facility that supports nearly 2/3 of town. A lift station failure here could cause environmental impacts such as overland spills and/or basement backups depending on the length and scope of the failure. The project will create a maintenance matrix on key elements to determine expected life, remaining life, by-pass pumping determination and station importance. Conceptual layouts and cost estimates will be prepared for the technical memorandum. Community Impact Understanding the integrity of the lift station will ensure continued operations of a facility that supports nearly 2/3 of town. A lift station failure here could cause environmental impacts such as overland spills and/or basement backups depending on the length and scope of the failure. This lift station is a major asset to support the core service of sanitation. Lift station #6 is a long- term asset and this contract ensures we understand how to keep it functioning well into the future while also keeping it current with today’s standards. G:\PW\UTIL\SANITARY SEWER\Lift Stations\#06\2018 Wall Deteriotation\RFP_LS6_20180507 CIP Scope.docx May 7, 2018 Mr. Chad Millner City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Re: Proposal for Engineering Services for Edina Lift Station Number 6 Improvements Project Barr Project No. 23271638 Dear Mr. Millner: On behalf of Barr Engineering Co., we are pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Edina for engineering services for the Lift Station Number 6 Improvements. Our proposal is based on information gathered at an initial site visit meeting with operations staff on March 21, 2018; project scoping meeting with engineering and operations staff on April 13, 2018; and our experience on similar projects. Understanding of the Project Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) understands that the City of Edina (City) desires to review the condition of existing Lift Station Number 6 (LS #6) to document current issues and deficiencies so that a maintenance/replacement plan can be developed that results in reliable long-term service. LS #6 was originally constructed in the late 1950s, with improvements made in the 1960s, early 2000s, and 2015. It is the largest and most important sanitary lift station in the City, providing service to nearly two-thirds of the community. The existing wet well metals and concrete are corroding in isolated areas, raising concerns for the overall integrity of the wet well. In addition, operations personnel note there are problems with the HVAC, pump-lifting system, operational flexibility, pump impeller wear, and noted that rainwater enters the control room through the walls in specific locations. The purpose of this project is to document the current condition of the station and provide the City with the information it needs to plan out future maintenance projects to ensure reliable long-term service at this key location. Some near-term maintenance is expected to at least correct the cause of the concrete corrosion noted during our recent inspection. The full scope of this maintenance will be determined during this project. If plans and specifications for bidding are needed, Barr proposes to perform the work in five phases: (1) conceptual design (15% complete), (2) preliminary design (60% complete), (3) final design (100% complete), (4) bidding/permitting, and (5) construction engineering support. Phase 1 is described in more detail below. Mr. Chad Millner Re: Proposal for Engineering Services for Edina Lift Station Number 6 Improvements - Barr Project No. 23271638 May 7, 2018 Page 2 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271638 Lift Station #6 Improvements\ProjRiskMgmt\Edina LS 6 Engineering Proposal_Facility Eval_Final R1.docx Proposed Scope of Work Barr proposes to approach this project in a phased approach as follows. Phase 1 Conceptual Design In Phase 1, we propose to complete our work in the following steps to allow for review and evaluation before progressing on to the next step. Step 1: Data Collection/Review In this step, Barr will collect available data from readily available sources and City records for use in development of the alternatives. During this step, we will conduct two site visits, the first of which was completed on March 21, and identify the need for additional data to complete this phase of the work. We anticipate that the following data will be reviewed in this step: • Existing topography and property lines • Existing utilities (water, sewer, gas, electricity, communications) • Existing facility conditions focused on the wet well (completed March 21 inspection) • Existing facility conditions focused on the external site and electrical and control features • Existing and future sewage flows • Existing facility drawings • Existing sewer piping televising, provided by the City (limited to main trunk ~1,000 feet upstream of LS #6, the forcemain, and ~1,000 feet of main trunk downstream of the forcemain discharge) Deliverables for this step include: • LS #6 condition assessment report based on observation notes from the two site visits. The assessment will be consistent with the City’s asset-management system and set up in a way so that station condition can be easily tracked over time. Step 2: Alternatives Development In this step, Barr will use the results of the site visits and other relevant information from Step 1 to estimate the remaining useful life of each major lift station element or grouping of elements. For example, the coating in the wet well would be at the end of its useful life since it is delaminating from the concrete substrate, while the meters installed in 2015 would be considered to have approximately 17 years remaining. Using this information, we will develop a maintenance schedule for each element or grouping of elements that is broken down into different time frames: 1. Those recommended to be repaired or replaced in the next 5 years 2. Those recommended to be repaired or replaced in 5 to 10 years 3. Those recommended to be repaired or replaced in more than 10 years Mr. Chad Millner Re: Proposal for Engineering Services for Edina Lift Station Number 6 Improvements - Barr Project No. 23271638 May 7, 2018 Page 3 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271638 Lift Station #6 Improvements\ProjRiskMgmt\Edina LS 6 Engineering Proposal_Facility Eval_Final R1.docx Following this, we will further evaluate each major element or grouping of elements according to the following two specific project constraint categories relative to the effort needed to replace or repair the element: 1. Those that can be replaced or repaired without by-pass pumping 2. Those that require by-pass pumping to be replaced or repaired Finally, the same elements or grouping of elements will be categorized by their importance to station operation and placed in one of the following groups: 1. Critical to station operation (i.e., pumps, pipes, electrical service; if they fail, the station fails) 2. Critical to operator safety (i.e., lights, ventilation, walkways; if they fail, human injury could occur) 3. Convenience (i.e., lifting lugs, meters, flow split) 4. Aesthetic/protective/security (i.e., odor control, brick façade, coatings, doors) 5. Other Using these categorizations, Barr will develop five conceptual projects as follows: 1. Repair or replace elements with 0-5 years remaining life without by-pass pumping 2. Repair or replace elements with 0-5 years remaining life with by-pass pumping 3. Repair or replace all elements with less than 10 years remaining life critical to station operation and operator safety 4. Combined project developed with collaborative owner and engineer input 5. Full station replacement as a baseline consideration The five projects will be simply described by the elements they include. From these, Barr will prepare additional information for three projects of the City’s choosing. Alternatives development would include the following tasks: • Prepare schematic or conceptual-level CAD drawings for each option including: o General arrangement per floor o Cross section(s) o Site plan if appropriate • Prepare construction cost estimates (including an estimate for a full station replacement to use as a baseline condition; note that no drawings will be prepared for the full station replacement) • Provide reliability risk analysis • Define operation and maintenance constraints and improvements • Two meetings with engineering and operations staff—one to provide a project update and develop alternative project #4 described above, and one to review the draft alternatives technical memorandum Mr. Chad Millner Re: Proposal for Engineering Services for Edina Lift Station Number 6 Improvements - Barr Project No. 23271638 May 7, 2018 Page 4 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271638 Lift Station #6 Improvements\ProjRiskMgmt\Edina LS 6 Engineering Proposal_Facility Eval_Final R1.docx Deliverables for this step include: • Maintenance matrix including key elements/groupings of elements with the following data for each: expected life, remaining life, by-pass pumping determination, and station importance • Conceptual layout drawings for three projects • Construction cost estimates for three projects • Alternatives technical memorandum Future Phases Future phases of work will include preliminary design, final design, permitting, bidding, and construction. The scope of future phases will be developed upon completion of the Phase 1 work on this project. Project Management and Meetings Barr will provide the City with weekly update emails throughout the Phase 1 work. The City will review the deliverables prepared by Barr and provide comments to verify that the work addresses requirements. Barr will provide ongoing project management services for the duration of the project. This will include: • Preparing and managing work tasks, schedules, staffing, and budgets • Reviewing and submitting invoices • Attending two meetings—one to develop project 4 and one to present final findings Project Assumptions Our scope of work assumes: • No additional field data collection will be required beyond that described in Phase 1 Owner’s Responsibility Our scope of work for Phase 1 assumes that the City will be responsible for: • Providing all existing available data defined in Step 1 above • Providing input on the conceptual designs and participate in selecting the option • Assist Barr staff during the second field inspection described in this proposal • Provide input on any other items known to need attention at LS #6 which may not be readily observed during a station inspection (i.e., SCADA or operational glitches, etc.) Mr. Chad Millner Re: Proposal for Engineering Services for Edina Lift Station Number 6 Improvements - Barr Project No. 23271638 May 7, 2018 Page 5 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\23271638 Lift Station #6 Improvements\ProjRiskMgmt\Edina LS 6 Engineering Proposal_Facility Eval_Final R1.docx Schedule and Budget We estimate that our work on Phase 1 will require approximately 4-6 weeks. We propose to charge for these services on a time-and-expenses basis as shown in the following table. Estimated Cost Phase Labor (hours) Expense Total Cost Phase 1 – Conceptual design Step 1 – Data Collection/Review 50 $200 $7,000 Step 2 – Alternative Development 240 $20 $28,000 Total 290 $220 $35,000 Note: Project management and meeting hours are embedded within the tasks noted above. Data Collection/Review and costs are over and above what has already occurred. We will not exceed that amount without prior approval from an authorized City representative. We appreciate the opportunity to offer our services for this project and hope to provide the City with the benefits of our highly qualified, committed, and invested staff; the knowledge and understanding that comes with experience at the site; and the reassurance of previous work on successful, complex projects. Please contact Brian (blemon@barr.com; 952-832-2774) or Jon (jminne@barr.com; 218-262-8688) if you have any questions. Sincerely, Brian K. LeMon, PE Jon M. Minne, PE Vice President, Project Principal Sr. Civil Engineer, Project Manager c: File Accepted this ____________ day of ___________________, 20____ City of Edina By Its Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.F. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:C had A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:R es olution No. 2018-46: Approve Q uit C laim Deed with S outhdale O ffic e P artners, LLC . Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve R esolution No. 2018-46 and Q uit C laim Deed to Southdale Office P artners, L L C , for the portion of right-of-way that was vacated as part of their development project I N TR O D U C TI O N: I n 1954, D ayton B ros provided the City a Quit Claim D eed to a large portion of 66th and Valley View Rd. Within this deed was the portion of the property the C ity agreed to vacate in R esolution 2016-125 dated October 31, 2016. T he City continues to be fee owner until this item is approved and filed with H ennepin C ounty to the new owner. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Resolution No. 2018-46 Quit Claim Deed RESOLUTION NO. 2018-46 APPROVING QUIT CLAIM DEED BETWEEN SOUTHDALE OFFICE PARTNERS, LLC AND CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, in 1954, Dayton Brothers provided the City a Quit Claim Deed to a large portion of 66th and Valley View Road, and; WHEREAS, the City agreed to vacate a portion of this property in Resolution 2016- 125 dated October 31, 2016, and; WHEREAS, The City remains a fee owner until the Quit Claim is approved and filed with Hennepin County to Southdale Office Partners, LLC, and; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina: 1. The transfer of the Subject Property to Southdale Office Partners, LLC is approved. 2. The City Council finds that the transfer of the Subject Property to Southdale Office Partners, LLC has no relationship to the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The requirements of Minn. Stat. §462.356 are hereby dispensed with as the same relate to the transfer of the Subject Property from the City to Southdale Office Partners, LLC. 4. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute any and all documents as necessary to complete the sale transaction. Adopted this 15th day of May, 2018. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _______ day of _____________, 20___. City Clerk 1 197454v1 QUIT CLAIM DEED STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ 1.65 Dated: _________________, 2018. FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to SOUTHDALE OFFICE PARTNERS LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, Grantee, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference. THE GRANTOR CERTIFIES THAT THE GRANTOR DOES NOT KNOW OF ANY WELLS ON THE DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY. The consideration for this transfer is less than $500.00. CITY OF EDINA BY: James Hovland, Mayor AND: Scott Neal, City Manager 2 197454v1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of _____________, 2018, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ___________________________________ Notary Public Tax Statements for the real property described in this instrument should be sent to: Southdale Office Partners LLC 6800 France Avenue South Suite 55 Edina, Minnesota 55435 DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A. Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000 AMP/smt 3 197454v1 EXHIBIT “A” Legal Description That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as commencing at a point 55.00 feet south of the north line of said Southeast Quarter and 190.00 feet west of the east line of said Southeast Quarter as measured along a line parallel with said north line of the Southeast Quarter, said north line having an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 49 minutes 52 seconds West; thence South 89 degrees 49 minutes 52 seconds West 85.02 feet; thence westerly 32.57 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 294.71 feet and a central angle of 06 degrees 19 minutes 55 seconds to the point of beginning; thence continuing westerly and southwesterly 389.38 feet, along said curve, having a central angle of 75 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds; thence South 07 degrees 47 minutes 52 seconds West, tangent to said curve, 164.99 feet; thence northwesterly 19.65 feet, along a nontangential curve, concave to the northeast, having a radius of 19.00 feet, a central angle of 59 degrees 14 minutes 39 seconds and a chord that bears North 30 degrees 45 minutes 07 seconds West; thence North 01 degree 07 minutes 47 seconds West, tangent to said curve, 61.46 feet; thence northerly 110.49 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the west; having a radius of 1735.00 feet and a central angle of 3 degrees 38 minutes 55 seconds; thence northerly 22.56 feet along a reverse curve, concave to the east, having a radius of 250.00 feet and a central angle of 5 degrees 10 minutes 16 seconds ; thence North 00 degrees 23 minutes 33 seconds East, tangent to last described curve, 118.54 feet; thence northerly, northeasterly and easterly 142.13 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the southeast, having a radius of 91.00 feet and a central angle of 89 degrees 29 minutes 18 seconds; thence North 89 degrees 52 minutes 51 seconds East, tangent to last described curve, 158.65 feet; thence South 85 degrees 57 minutes 21 seconds East 48.23 feet to the point of beginning. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.G . To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Mark Nolan, AI C P, Transportation P lanner Item Activity: Subject:Approve Traffic S afety R eport of April 3, 2018 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: R eview and approve the T raffic S afety R eport of April 3, 2018. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he E dina Transportation Commission (E T C) reviewed the April 3, 2018, Traffic Safety Report at their April 19 meeting and moved to forward the report to the C ity C ouncil for approval. See attached draft minutes. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report: Traffic Safety of Apr 3, 2018 DRAFT Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission April 19, 2018 May 15, 2018 Edina City Council Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator Traffic Safety Report of April 3, 2018 Information / Background: The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on April 3. The Traffic Safety Coordinator, Engineering Director, Public Works Director, Assistant City Planner and Transportation Planner were in attendance for this meeting. The Traffic Safety Specialist and Police Lieutenant were not able to attend and were informed of the decisions and did not object to the recommendations. For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included on the April 19 Edina Transportation Commission and the May 15 City Council meeting agendas. Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action A1. Request to change parking restrictions on Bush Lake Rd and W 74th St  A worker at 7421 Bush Lake Rd is requesting on street parking as a new business is causing customers to park in adjacent parking lots impacting neighboring businesses  Parking is restricted on both sides of Bush Lake and W 74th  Bush Lake and W 74th have widths of 39’  Bush Lake and W 74th have ADTs of 3,747 and 3,420 respectively  Bush Lake and W 74th have 85% speeds of 34.2 and 30.9 MPH respectively Map: Location of 7421 Bush Lake (note: the location in red is where on street parking is recommended) STAFF REPORT Page 2 After review, staff recommends removing parking restriction on the east side of Bush Lake Rd and the south side of W 74th St. Staff is also recommending adding signage indicating “No Parking Here to Corner” at the intersections of Bush Lake and W 74th and W 76th. A2. Request to change horizontal alignment signage on Lincoln Dr  Requestor is concerned with vehicles traveling too fast and causing dangerous situations for pedestrians  Resident is requesting changing the current signage looking to raise driver caution while approaching the turns  A reverse curve sign is currently placed, and it is requesting to place a reverse turn sign  Lincoln Dr is a State-Aided Collector street with an ADT of 2,500  A calculated radii of 200’ at this curve, creates a recommended speed 25 MPH based on AASHTO measurements  85 % speed collected south of Maloney is 36.5 MPH After review, staff recommends changing the current signage to a reverse turn sign, along with adding a 25 mph speed limit placard beneath to inform drivers of recommended speeds thru the curves along Lincoln Dr. A3. Request for a pedestrian ramp on W 66th St at Cornelia Circle  A resident that lives in Cornelia Cir uses the sidewalk on the north side of W 66th St on a regular basis and finds it difficult to cross W 66th and ‘hop the curb’ with bicycles and strollers  Total pedestrian crosses at this location are seven with a two hour peak of six crosses  ADT on W 66th was 8,161 in 2013 with 85% speed of 33.5 mph  A pedestrian path from Rosland Park leads to this section of W 66th After review, staff recommends adding a pedestrian ramp on W 66th St sidewalk to the north east corner of Cornelia Cir. Staff agrees a marked crosswalk is unwarranted, but Map: Location of Lincoln utilizing horizontal alignment signage Photo: Current horizontal alignment signage Map: Location of Cornelia Circle in relation to Rosland STAFF REPORT Page 3 given the features of Cornelia Cir and W 66th St, pedestrians with limited conditions would benefit from a pedestrian ramp directly north of Cornelia Cir. Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action B1. Request for all-way stop at W 56th St and Warwick Place / Yvonne Terrace  Resident is concerned with the safety of this intersection and is requesting an all-way stop  Warwick and Yvonne is stop controlled while W 56th is uncontrolled  W 56th and Warwick/Yvonne are classified as local streets  ADT entering this intersection along W 56th and Warwick/Yvonne is 460 and 90, respectively  85% speed on W 56th is 28.6 MPH  No crashes have been reported at this intersection in the last five years After review, staff recommends no action as this intersection does not meet warrants for all-way stop controls. Staff believes there is no sight line issues or concerns in which adding all-way stop control will improve the current level of safety. B2. Request to restrict parking on Ridgeview Dr, south of W 63rd St  A resident that travels thru this neighborhood notices many close-calls when parking is being utilized on both sides of Ridgeview  After video review, cars utilized parking on both sides of Ridgeview during afternoon hours  Ridgeview is classified as a Local Connector  ADT on Ridgeview is 541  Ridgeview has a width of 29 feet  Traveling east/south from W 63rd a ‘curve’ sign with a 20 MPH placard is present which recommends drivers lower their speeds upon approaching this curve After review, staff recommends no changes. The Traffic Safety Committee agrees drivers traveling east/south from W 63rd can see a ‘curve’ sign with a 20 MPH speed placard which signifies a slower speed is necessary when traveling thru this curve. Photo: Vehicles parking on both sides of Ridgeview Map: Location of W 56th and Warwick / Yvonne Map: Location of Ridgeview with on‐street parking concern STAFF REPORT Page 4 Section C: Items on which staff recommends further study C1. Request to change lane designations on Hazelton Rd at France Ave  A resident was concerned with vehicles traveling west on Hazelton would turn left (southbound) onto France from the center (straight) lane  Westbound lane designations on Hazelton are left turn, straight and right turn  Hazelton is classified as a state-aid collector street  The following data shows westbound turning movements After review, staff recommends further study regarding vehicle queueing along westbound Hazelton Rd, turning movements and input from Hennepin County. Section D: Other traffic safety items handled D1. A resident contacted traffic safety to report a large pothole which caused damage to their vehicle. Upon finding the location of the pothole, the construction companies working along 50th & France were informed of the issue and placed a ‘BUMP’ sign to warn drivers to be cautious when navigating thru this area. D2. A postal worker was concerned with the level of safety for drivers and pedestrians at the intersection of W 56th St and Xerxes Ave. This worker requested stop lights at this intersection believing it will increase overall safety. Upon contacting Hennepin County about this request, no physical changes were recommended to this intersection, but increasing police patrol should improve the safety of drivers and pedestrians. EPD was contacted to increase patrol at W 56th and Xerxes. Direction Left Turn Thru Middle Lane, Left Turn Right Turn ADT 1965 230 18 2184 % 44.7 5.2 0.4 49.7 Map: Location of France and Hazelton Photo: Hazelton facing west showing lane markings STAFF REPORT Page 5 Appendix A: All-Way Stop Warrants Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist. Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting roads is approximately equal. The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.4 also apply to multi-way stop applications. The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. The following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation: A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic control signal. B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions. C. Minimum volumes: 1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and 2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour; but 3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2. D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80 percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition. Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include: A. The need to control left-turn conflicts; B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian volumes; C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of the intersection. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room April 19, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Richman called the meeting to order II. Roll Call Answering roll call were commissioners Johnson, Kane, McCarthy, Olson, Richman, Ruthruff, Scherer, Veluvali, Yeager Absent: Commissioners Ahler, Ma III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by commissioner Kane and seconded by commissioner Olson to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by commissioner Johnson and seconded by commissioner Ruthruff approving the March 15, 2018 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations Melissa Madison from commuter services presented on Commuter Services/I-494 Corridor Commission, and Travel Demand Management (TDM). Motion was made by commissioner McCarthy and seconded by Johnson to investigate options and make suggestions to develop a Traffic Demand Management Ordinance. All voted aye. Motion carried. A committee was formed of members McCarthy, Kane and Johnson to work on TDM recommendations. VI. Community Comment None. VII. Reports/Recommendations D. Traffic Safety Report of April 3, 2018 Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by Johnson to the approve April 3rd, 2018 Traffic Safety Report. All voted Aye, motion carried. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.H. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Jeff Brown, C ommunity Health Adminis trator Item Activity: Subject:R es olution No. 2018-44: P ublic Health Emergenc y P reparedness G rant Agreement Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt R esolution No. 2018-44 Authorizing P ublic H ealth Emergency P reparedness G rant Agreement with the M innesota D epartment of Health. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T his annual grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of H ealth provides funding for public health planning and response to emergencies, including mass dispensing and extreme weather events. T he City of E dina partners with C ity of B loomington P ublic H ealth to complete these grant duties. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Resolution No. 2018-44: Authorize Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Agreement 2018-2019 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 RESOLUTION NO 2018-44 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO ENTER INTO A PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services, and WHEREAS, the STATE and the City of Edina have entered into a master grant contract effective January 1, 2015, and WHEREAS, the STATE has entered into an agreement with the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to assist local health departments in demonstrating measurable and sustainable progress toward achieving public health preparedness capabilities and other activities that promote safer and more resilient communities, and implement and carry out the CDC's Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Agreement Amendment with the Minnesota Department of Health to successfully complete administrative and programmatic duties contained within this grant agreement. Passed and adopted this 15th day of May 2018. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ City Clerk Amendment # 1 for Grant Project Agreement # 127913 Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB CHB Grant Project Agreement Amendment (02/2017) Page 1 of 3 Minnesota Department of Health Community Health Board Grant Project Agreement Amendment Grant Project Agreement Start Date: 7/1/2017 Current Project Amendment Amount $ 52,330 Original Grant Project Agreement Expiration Date: 6/30/2022 Original Grant Project Agreement Amount: $ 52,280 Current Grant Project Agreement Expiration Date: 6/30/2022 Previous Project Amendment(s) Total: $ ‐0‐ Requested Grant Project Agreement Expiration Date: 6/30/2019 Requested Total Grant Project Agreement Amount: $ 104,610 This Grant Project Agreement Amendment is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Health (hereinafter “State”) and City of Edina Community Health Board 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (hereinafter “Grantee”). Recitals 1. The State has a grant project agreement with the Grantee identified as SWIFT Contract # 127913 (“Original Grant Project Agreement”) to provide measurable and sustained progress in the implementation and execution of the CDC’s Public Health Preparedness Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning. Funding and activities for this agreement are authorized under Section 319 C ‐1 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act (47 USC § 247d‐3a, as amended. If applicable, contingent supplemental emergency response awards are authorized under 317 (a) and 317 (d) of the Public Health Service Act (42 USC § 247b (a) and (d) subject to available funding and other requirements and limitations. 2. This amendment provides supplemental federal funding based on continuation funding from CDC for grant duties, exercises, plans, and other deliverables. Funding requires the successful completion and acceptance of all duties and deliverables including AARIPs by the State prior to June 30, 2019. 3. This amendment serves as notification to funded entities that the current period of performance originally scheduled to end on June 30, 2022 will now end of June 30, 2019. 4. The State and the Grantee are willing to amend the Original Grant Project Agreement as stated below. Grant Agreement Amendment Amended or deleted grant project agreement terms will be struck out, and the added grant project agreement terms will be underlined. REVISION 1. Clause 2. “Term of Agreement” is amended as follows: 2.1 Effective date. This grant project agreement shall be effective on July 1, 2017, or the date the STATE obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes 16B.98. Subd. 5(a), whichever is later. The GRANTEE must not begin work until this contract is fully executed and the State’s Authorized Representative has notified the GRANTEE that work may commence. 2.2 Expiration date. June 30, 2022, June 30, 2019 or until all obligations have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the STATE, whichever occurs first, except for the requirements specified in this grant Amendment # 1 for Grant Project Agreement # 127913 Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB CHB Grant Project Agreement Amendment (02/2017) Page 2 of 3 project agreement with completion dates which extend beyond the termination date specified in this sentence. . REVISION 2. Clause 4.1. “Consideration” is amended as follows: 4.1 Consideration. The STATE will pay for all services performed by the GRANTEE under this grant project agreement as follows: (a) Compensation. The GRANTEE will be paid on a reimbursement basis only. Budget Period Award Amounts Each specific Budget Period award is available only for the specific Budget Period for which it is awarded. Funds remaining and not fully liquidated at the end of each Budget Period will be cancelled and will not be available to the GRANTEE in any subsequent Budget Period. Award Name Budget Period Award Amount Budget Period 1 PHEP Budget Period 1 July 1, 2017‐June 30, 2018 $40,280 Budget Period 1 CRI Budget Period 1 July 1, 2017‐June 30, 2018 $12,000 Budget Period 2 Budget Period1 Supplement PHEP Budget Period 2 Budget Period 1 Supplement July 1, 2018‐June 30, 2019 $ 40,330 Budget Period 2 Budget Period1 Supplement CRI Budget Period 2 Budget Period 1 Supplement July 1, 2018‐June 30, 2019 $ 12,000 Budget Period 3 PHEP Budget Period 3 July 1, 2019‐June 30, 2020 $ To Be Determined Budget Period 3 CRI Budget Period 3 July 1, 2019‐June 30, 2020 $ To Be Determined Budget Period 4 PHEP Budget Period 4 July 1, 2020‐June 30, 2021 $ To Be Determined Budget Period 4 CRI Budget Period 4 July 1, 2020‐June 30, 2021 $ To Be Determined Budget Period 5 PHEP Budget Period 5 July 1, 2021‐June 30, 2022 $ To Be Determined Budget Period 5 CRI Budget Period 5 July 1, 2021‐June 30, 2022 $ To Be Determined (b) Total Obligation. The total obligation of the STATE for all compensation and reimbursements to the GRANTEE under this grant project agreement will not exceed Fifty‐two thousand two hundred eighty dollars ($52,280) One hundred four thousand six hundred ten dollars ($ 104,610). Except as amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Grant Project Agreement and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect. The Original Grant Project Agreement, and all previous amendments, are incorporated by reference into this amendment. Amendment # 1 for Grant Project Agreement # 127913 Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB CHB Grant Project Agreement Amendment (02/2017) Page 3 of 3 APPROVED: 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A.15 and 16C.05. Signed: Date: SWIFT Contract/PO No(s). 2. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant project agreement amendment on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: Title: Date: By: Title: Date: 3. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH By: (with delegated authority) Title: Date: Distribution:  MDH – Original (fully executed) Grant Project Agreement Amendment  Grantee  State’s Authorized Representative Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.I. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:MJ Lamon, P rojec t C oordinator Item Activity: Subject:C ommunity Health C ommis s ion Appointment Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Appoint D ena Soukup to the C ommunity H ealth C ommission with a partial term ending 3/1/19. I N TR O D U C TI O N: Dena S oukup was selected as an alternate for the Community Health Commission during the 2018 annual on boarding session. S he will be replacing C aleb Schultz who resigned April 2018. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.J. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk Item Activity: Subject:2018 C ity C ouncil Meeting S c hedule C hange Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion approving moving the first meeting in August to Wednesday August 8, 2018. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he first meeting in August was scheduled for T uesday, August 7, however this is N ite to Unite so staff is suggesting that meeting be moved to Wednesday, August 8, 2018. T here are no other conflicts with the Wednesday date. I have attached an updated calendar showing City Council, H R A, legal holidays and days of religious observation. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Revised 2018 City Council & HRA Meeting Calendar 2018 City Council & HRA Meeting Schedules Holidays City Council Nite to Unite HRA Meeting Date Indicates a religious holiday's observance Election Day Caucus Night With Legal Holidays, Religious Observance Days, Elections & Caucus Dates JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 1 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER Adopted January 3, 2018 HRA Adopted December 19, 2017 Council Revised May 15, 2018 Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.K. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Jos eph Abood, G eneral Manager Item Activity: Subject:C ontract Addendum: Mid America G olf and Landsc ape Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve C ontract Addendum for the Braemar Master P lan P roject. I N TR O D U C TI O N: M id-America Golf & L andscape has requested the C ity change the B raemar M aster P lan P roject S ubstantial C ompletion date from S eptember 29, 2017, to June 29, 2018, by way of an addendum to the original contract. I n return, M id-America is offering "C ontract B etterments" to improve the overall project without adding cost to the City. T he Contract will be amended to change the S ubstantial C ompletion D ate as well as to add the following work: A. Install bent grass sod from H & E S od on the 2 chipping greens. B . P rovide greens covers for grow-in of #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #16, #17 and #18 putting surfaces. C . Install the synthetic turf surface on the multipurpose area bid as bocce ball courts. D. I nstall the concrete surface-patio around the multipurpose area per the R M G A landscape plan. E. P rovide three (3) people with grow-in experience and fertility assistance from M ay 2018 to J uly 31, 2018. F. H ydro mulch remaining T urf G rass areas beyond the sixty (60) acres in the contract. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Contract Addendum Mid-America Letter 1 196001v1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE RENOVATION CONTRACT AGREEMENT made this _______ day of ___________, 2018 by and between the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and Mid-America Golf and Landscape Inc., a Missouri corporation ("Contractor"), collectively “the Parties.” WHEREAS, the City and Contractor entered into the Braemar Golf Course Renovation Contract dated July 14, 2016 (“Contract”); and WHEREAS, the Contract provides that the work required to be performed by the Contractor had to be completed by September 29, 2017 and the work has not been completed; and WHEREAS, the Parties agree the Contract should be amended. NOW, THEREFORE, the City and the Contractor agree as follows: 1. The Contract shall remain in full force and effect, except as amended by this First Amendment. 2. The Work must be completed and ready for final payment by June 29, 2018. If the work has not been completed by the completion date, the Contractor shall pay the City liquidated damages of One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollars per calendar day until completion. 3. The City agrees to pay the Contractor and the Contractor agrees to accept payment of Five Million Three Hundred Three Thousand Seven Hundred Twelve and 83/100 ($5,303,712.83) Dollars. This includes change orders previously approved by the Parties and the additional Work set forth in paragraph 4 of this First Amendment. The current unpaid balance, 2 196001v1 including retainage, is Eight Hundred Seventy Eight Thousand Six Hundred Forty Six and 66/100 ($878,646.66) Dollars. 4. The Contract is amended to add the following work: A. Install bent grass sod from H & E Sod on the 2 chipping greens. B. Provide greens covers for grow-in of #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #16, #17 and #18 putting surfaces. C. Install the synthetic turf surface on the multipurpose area bid as bocce ball courts. D. Install the concrete surface-patio around the multipurpose area per the RMGA landscape plan. E. Provide three (3) people with grow-in experience and fertility assistance from May 2018 to July 31, 2018. F. Hydro mulch remaining Turf Grass areas beyond the sixty (60) acres in the contract. CITY OF EDINA MID-AMERICA GOLF AND LANDSCAPE, INC. BY: ______________________________ BY: ______________________________ James Hovland, Mayor Name: _________________________ Title: __________________________ AND _____________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager Mid-America Golf and Landscape, Inc. 1621 Southeast Summit Street, Lee’s Summit, MO 64081 Ph. 816-524-0010 Fax. 816-524-0150 Website: www.mid-americagolf.com March 7, 2018 Mr. Joe Abood General Manager Braemar Golf Course 6364 John Harris Drive Minneapolis, MN 55439 Re: Contract Betterements Mr. Joe The following are the agreed upon contract betterments offered to the city of Edina in lieu of the Liquidated Damage clause of the contract for the reconstruction of the Braemar Golf Course. 1. Install bentgrass sod from H & E Sod on the 2 chipping greens. 2. Provide greens covers for grow-in of #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #16, #17 & #18 putting surfaces. 3. Install the synthetic turf surface on the multipurpose area bid as bocce ball courts. 4. Install the concrete surface-patio around the multipurpose area per the RMGA landscape plan. 5. Provide 3 guys with grow in experience and fertility assistance from May 2018 to July 31, 2018. 6. Hydro mulch remaining Turf Grass areas beyond the 60 acres in the contract. Mid America Golf has agreed to do the above mentioned additions to the Braemar golf course project provided the Liquidated Damage Clause is removed from the contract. These items and all work outlined in the included work plan will be completed for substantial completion June 29, 2018 with all grassing complete by June 15, 2018. Sincerely Larry Barefield Project Manager Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.L. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Jos eph Abood, G eneral Manager Item Activity: Subject:Braemar Leas e Agreement Approval: R ed R iver Kitc hen Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion approving Lease Agreement with O'R eilly Custom 4, L L C to operate Red R iver K itchen at Braemar Golf C ourse. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he C ity of E dina and B raemar G olf C ourse wish to enter into a L ease Agreement with O 'R eilly C ustom 4, L L C to operate the R ed R iver K itchen at Braemar G olf C ourse. A R equest F or P roposals (R F P ) was advertised on D ecember 15, 2017 by the C ity of E dina and B raemar G olf C ourse for its F ood & Beverage Operation at the Braemar C lubhouse. On F ebruary 7, 2018, four proposals were received by the C ity to operate the concession. An extensive review and interview process was conducted by C ity S taff that included the Golf Operations Team, P arks and R ecreation C ommission members, non-golf C ity S taff, L eague M embers and general golf patrons. As a result of this process, a recommendation to enter into a L ease Agreement with O’R eilly Custom 4, L L C to operate as the R ed River Kitchen at B raemar is being presented. T he City of E dina Attorney's O ffice drafted this agreement with O ’Reilly C ustom 4, L L C. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Leas e Agreement - Red River Kitchen at Braemar 196887v10 LEASE AGREEMENT By and Between CITY OF EDINA (“CITY”) And O’REILLY CUSTOM 4, LLC (“TENANT”) BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE RESTAURANT 2 196887v10 LEASE REFERENCE PAGES (Page 1 of 2) FACILITY: Braemar Golf Course, 6364 John Harris Drive Edina, MN 55439 CITY/LANDLORD: City of Edina CITY’S ADDRESS: 4801 West 50th St, Edina. MN 55424 LEASE REFERENCE DATE: May _______, 2018 TENANT: O’REILLY CUSTOM 4, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company TENANT’S ADDRESS: 221 Cedar Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55454 PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse Restaurant (identified as “Restaurant“ on Exhibit B) TOTAL CLUBHOUSE SQUARE FOOTAGE: Approximately 24,298 square feet LEASED PREMISES AREA: Approximately 7,161 sq. ft. TENANT’S PROPORTIONATE SHARE: 29% USE (AUTHORIZED BUSINESS): Red River Kitchen TENANT’S TRADE NAME: Red River Kitchen POSSESSION DATE: June 1, 2018 COMMENCEMENT DATE: June 1, 2018 SCHEDULED RENT COMMENCEMENT DATE: June 1, 2018 TERMINATION DATE: May 31, 2023 3 196887v10 LEASE REFERENCE PAGES (Page 2 of 2) TERM OF LEASE: Five (5) years beginning on the Commencement Date and ending on the Termination Date (unless sooner terminated pursuant to this Lease) with options for two (2) additional 5-year terms BASE RENT: 12.50% of gross sales during peak months and 10.50% of gross sales during off-peak months Temporary Reduction: 6.0% during peak and off- peak months prior to Course Re-Opening; See Article 3 for Rent, Additional Rent CAM $2,000.00/month Temporary Reduction: $1,000.00/month prior to Course Re-Opening SECURITY DEPOSIT: $5,000.00 due at signing of this Lease The Reference Page information is incorporated into and made a part of the Lease between Tenant and the City dated as of _______________________, 2018 (“Lease”). In the event of any conflict between any Reference Page information and the Lease, the Lease shall control. The Lease includes Exhibits A, B, and C which are all made a part of this Lease. LANDLORD/CITY: TENANT: CITY OF EDINA O’REILLY CUSTOM 4, LLC By: By: James Hovland, Mayor Matty O’Reilly Its: And:________________________ Date: _______________ _____, 2018 Scott Neal, City Manager Date: __________ _________, 2018 4 196887v10 THIS LEASE AGREEMENT made and entered into this ____ day of ______________ 2018, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, (“City”) and O’REILLY CUSTOM 4, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Tenant”). RECITALS A. The City owns and operates the Braemar Golf Course located at 6364 John Harris Drive, Edina, Minnesota, 55439 (“Golf Course”), as legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto; B. The Golf Course facility is configured with 18-regulation holes of golf, driving range, putting green, clubhouse, 9 par 3 holes of golf, Academy 9 clubhouse and miscellaneous outbuildings (“Facility”); C. The 18-regulation holes of golf is not yet completed and is expected to be fully open in the Summer of 2019 (“Course Re-Opening); D. The clubhouse located within the Facility is a two-level structure (“Clubhouse”) that includes the following: Upper Level: a pro shop (“Pro Shop”), banquet room (“Banquet Room”), full service kitchen area, catering kitchen area, public seating/dining area (“Club Room”), restrooms and circulation space, and decks, approximately 16,133 total square feet; and Lower Level: golf cart storage, men’s and women’s locker rooms, restrooms, three lounge/meeting rooms and miscellaneous storage and mechanical space, approximately 11,524 square feet in area; E. The City desires to lease the restaurant area and Banquet Room of the Clubhouse to the Tenant for restaurant and event service to the public consistent with the quality of the Golf Course, including service to all patios/decks, on-course beverage cart service, the Academy 9 Clubhouse, Golf Dome, and the multi-use lawn area (the “Authorized Business Purpose”); F. The Tenant desires to operate the restaurant and on-course food and beverage services and related services at the Facility; G. The City and the Tenant desire to coordinate the Tenant operations with the Golf Course to provide a seamless first class experience for those interested in utilizing the Clubhouse; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein the parties hereto agree as follows: 5 196887v10 ARTICLE 1 – LEASED PREMISES Subject to the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease, the City does hereby lease and let unto Tenant, and Tenant does hereby hire, lease and take from the City, approximately 7,161 square feet of upper level space in the Clubhouse containing the commercial kitchen, customer service counters, Banquet Room, portion of outdoor deck and areas specifically marked on said Exhibit B (the “Premises”). The Premises consists of approximately twenty-nine percent (29%) of the total Clubhouse area, excluding outdoor deck and patio areas. ARTICLE 2 - USE A. The Premises will be used by the Tenant only for the Authorized Business Purpose, and related activities, including on-site food and beverage services, catering services, and operation of food and beverage carts for the Golf Course. The Tenant operation will be commensurate with a first class golf operation and banquet facility. Tenant shall have the exclusive right to serve food in indoor and outdoor common areas of the facilities designated by the City and specifically marked on Exhibit C (the “Common Areas”) with the permission of the General Manager. B. Tenant shall apply for all such licenses, permits and approvals necessary for it to conduct the Authorized Business within the Premises and on the Facility, and shall diligently pursue such applications, and take all reasonable actions within its control to obtain such licenses, permits and approvals. The obtaining and retaining of such licenses shall be Tenant’s sole responsibility, the failure of which shall be deemed a Default hereunder. C. The Tenant is permitted to use and store food trucks at the Facility, subject to the prior approval of the General Manager concerning storage, location, operation, days and hours of Tenant’s food trucks. D. Tenant shall always conduct its operations in the Premises and at the Facility under its present trade name, unless the City shall otherwise consent in writing to a different name, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld by the City E. Tenant is permitted to prepare food in the Premises for off-site consumption. F. Tenant, its employees, agents, guests and invitees shall have the reasonable non- exclusive right to use the Common Areas (as hereinafter defined) of the Facility, including, but not limited to, upper level circulation corridors, lower and upper level restrooms, Club Room seating area, outdoor patio near front entrance of Clubhouse, upper level of Academy 9 Clubhouse, outdoor deck abutting restaurant, parking facilities, sidewalks, driveways, access ways, and common hallways as shown on Exhibit “C” (“Common Areas”) and as further detailed under Article 7 and the City shall have the full control, management and direction of the Common Areas. The Club Room will be the primary restaurant patron seating area. G. Except as otherwise provided herein, Tenant shall keep the Premises (including all windows and doors leading to the Premises) clean and in an orderly and presentable manner. 6 196887v10 H. Tenant further agrees not to commit or permit any act to be performed on the Premises or any omission to occur which shall be in violation of any statute, regulation or ordinance of any governmental body or which will increase the insurance rates on the Facility or which will be in violation of any insurance policy carried on the Facility by the City. Tenant, at its expense, shall comply with all governmental laws, ordinances, rules and regulations applicable to the use of the Premises and its occupancy and shall promptly comply with all governmental orders, rulings and directives for the correction, prevention and abatement of any violation upon, or in connection with, the Premises or Tenant's use or occupancy of the Premises, including the making of any alterations or improvements to the Premises, all at Tenant's sole cost and expense. I. Tenant shall comply with the non-smoking requirements for the Facility and Clubhouse. J. Tenant shall maintain a record of all Banquet Room rentals scheduled by Tenant and provide weekly update of rentals to General Manager. Tenant may not schedule events in the Club Room without prior approval of the General Manager. K. Tenant must be able to serve food and beverages to all patrons of the Golf Course and restaurant and for all golf events of any size scheduled by the City at the Golf Course even when Banquet Room is rented. City will provide Tenant with reasonable notice of all scheduled golf events. L. City shall have the right to use the Banquet Room for 4 events each month at no cost. These events shall be scheduled between Monday at 7:00 a.m. and Friday at 5:00 p.m. City shall provide reasonable notice to Tenant regarding the date and time of the event and the need for catering services by the Tenant. City events where food is served by Tenant will not be included as an event under this provision. ARTICLE 3 – TERM OF LEASE A. The term of this lease shall be five (5) years as set forth in the Reference Page (hereafter referred to as the “Initial Term”) upon the rentals and subject to the conditions set forth in this Lease, and the Exhibits attached hereto. The Commencement Date and the Termination Date are specifically subject to the provisions of Article 6 hereof. B. Tenant shall, provided this Lease is in full force and effect and Tenant is not in Default under any of the other terms and conditions of this Lease at the time of notification, have the option to renew (“Renewal Option”) this Lease for two 5 year terms (“Renewal Terms”) on the same terms and conditions set forth in this Lease, except as modified by the terms, covenants and conditions as set forth below in this Section 3(B): 1. If Tenant elects to exercise the Renewal Options, then Tenant shall provide the City with written notice no earlier than a date which is one year prior to the Termination Date of the this Lease but no later than a date which is one hundred eighty (180) days prior to the Termination Date. If Tenant fails to provide such notice, Tenant 7 196887v10 shall have no further or additional right to extend or renew the Lease. The notice shall be given in the manner provided in this Lease for the giving of notices to the City. 2. The Renewal Options are not transferable and the parties acknowledge and agree that they intend that the aforesaid Renewal Options of this Lease shall be “personal” to Tenant as set forth above and that in no event will any assignee or sublessee have any rights to exercise the aforesaid options to renew. 3. If both Renewal Options provided for above are exercised, Tenant shall have no further right to extend the Term of the Lease. 4. If the Renewal Options are exercised, the parties will review and renegotiate Rent, CAM and other fees under the Renewal Term to better reflect taxes and actual costs and usage at the time the renewal is exercised, not to exceed 10% of the rates currently in effect. If the parties cannot agree on these terms, no renewal will take effect. ARTICLE 4 - RENT A. Rent. Tenant agrees to pay to the City as rent (hereinafter called “Rent”) for the Premises, without notice, setoff, or demand, except as specifically set forth herein, monthly rent as follows: April 1 – September 30th: twelve and a half percent (12.5%) of Tenant’s gross sales October 1 – March 31st: ten and a half percent (10.5%) of Tenant’s gross sales Gross sales shall be derived from all of Tenant’s operations on the Facility, including Food Truck sales and sales conducted on publicly owned and operated property located within the City of Edina, subject to the adjustments, as hereinafter set forth. For each month during the Lease Term, said monthly installments to be due and payable by Tenant on or before the fifth day after every month for the prior month. Each payment shall be accompanied by a statement showing the gross sales during the payment period itemized by total daily receipts. One quarter percent (.25%) of Tenant’s gross sales (included as part of the Rent payment) will be held in a capital reserve by the City to re-invest in the food and beverage operation and Leased Premises at the Facility. The capital reserve will be administered by City and improvements will be made at its discretion. Tenant may submit recommendations concerning such improvements to City for consideration. B. Adjustments to Rent. Notwithstanding any other terms, covenants or conditions herein, the Rent may be adjusted by written addendum to this Lease as follows: 1. Reduced Rent. The monthly rent for all months during course construction and prior to Course Re-Opening shall be six percent (6%) of Tenant’s gross sales as calculated pursuant to Paragraph A of Article 4. 8 196887v10 C. Records. Tenant shall maintain complete and accurate financial books and records of its operations at the Facility in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The City or its representatives shall be entitled to inspect the books and records of Tenant’s operations at the Facility identified in Article 2, during regular business hours at least once per month. In the event that such audit by the City or its representatives determines that the City has been underpaid or overpaid: the amount of any such underpayment shall be remitted to the City within ten (10) days of written notice to Tenant; and any such overpayment may be subtracted from future payments by Tenant. D. Late Rent. Tenant recognizes that late payment of Rent or any other sum due under this Lease will result in administrative expense to the City, the extent of which additional expense is extremely difficult and economically impractical to ascertain. Tenant therefore agrees that if rent or any other sum is not paid when due and payable pursuant to this Lease, a late charge shall be imposed in an amount equal to: Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00), plus interest equal to five percent (5%) per annum for the unpaid rent or other payment. Any rent payment which is made late shall be accompanied by Tenant payment of the late payment fees. In addition, Tenant may be assessed a customary service fee for any check which is returned as NSF non-sufficient funds. The provisions of this Section do not relieve Tenant of the obligation to pay Rent, Additional Rent or other payments on or before the date on which they are due, nor do the terms of this Section in any way affect the City’s remedies pursuant to Article 21 of this Lease in the event Rent or other payment is unpaid after date due. E. Security Deposit. Tenant shall deposit the Security Deposit, Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), with the City upon the execution of this Lease. Said sum shall be held by the City as security for the faithful performance by Tenant of all the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease to be kept and performed by Tenant and not as an advance rental deposit or as a measure of the City’s damage in case of Tenant’s Default. If Tenant Defaults with respect to any provision of this Lease, the City may use any part of the Security Deposit for the payment of any Rent or any other sum in default, or for the payment of any amount which the City may spend or become obligated to spend by reason of Tenant’s default, or to compensate the City for any other loss or damage which the City may suffer by reason of Tenant’s Default. If any portion is so used, Tenant shall within five (5) days after written demand therefor, deposit with the City an amount sufficient to restore the Security Deposit to its original amount, and Tenant’s failure to do so shall be a material breach of this Lease. Except to such extent, if any, as shall be required by law, the City shall not be required to keep the Security Deposit separate from its general funds, and Tenant shall not be entitled to interest on such deposit. If Tenant shall fully and faithfully perform every provision of this Lease to be performed by it, the Security Deposit or any balance thereof shall be returned to Tenant upon the second anniversary of the Commencement Date of this Lease. ARTICLE 5 - CONSTRUCTION Tenant agrees to take and shall take the Premises in its “as is” condition. Any improvements to the Premises shall be made by Tenant at the sole cost and expense of Tenant, subject to all other provisions of this Lease, including compliance with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances and regulations. 9 196887v10 ARTICLE 6 – POSSESSION AND MOVE-IN PERIOD A. Except as otherwise provided, the City shall deliver possession of the Leased Premises on the Possession Date set forth on the Reference Page to allow Tenant to install trade fixtures and equipment (“Move-in Period”). Failure of the City to deliver possession of the Premises by the Possession Date, shall automatically postpone the Commencement Date of this Lease and shall extend the Termination Date by periods equal to those which shall have elapsed between and including the date specified for commencement of the Move-in Period and the date on which possession of the Premises is delivered to the Tenant. Tenant’s occupancy during the Move- in Period shall in all respects be the same as that of the Tenant under this Lease, with the exception of the payment of Rent. The Rent herein reserved shall commence on the Scheduled Rent Commencement. During the Move-in Period, the City shall have no responsibility or liability for loss or damage to fixtures, facilities or equipment installed or left within the Leased Premises. ARTICLE 7 – USE OF COMMON AREAS A. Except as otherwise provided herein, Tenant, and its licensees, concessionaires, employees and customers (for purposes of this Article, collectively "Tenant") shall have the non-exclusive right to use the Common Areas in common with the City, other users and tenants of the Facility and other persons entitled to use the same. The City may require that automobiles operated by Tenant or its employees be parked in specific portions of the Common Areas or other parking areas outside the Facility which are in reasonable proximity thereto. Tenant shall not interfere with the rights of other persons to use the Common Areas. The City may temporarily close parts of the Common Areas for such periods of time as may be necessary for (i) temporary use as a work area in connection with the construction of buildings or other improvements within the Facility or contiguous property, (ii) repairs or alterations in or to the Common Areas or to any utility type facilities, (iii) security reasons, (iv) doing and performing such other acts as in the use of good business judgment the City shall determine to be appropriate for the Facility, or (v) private rentals of areas of the Facility for catered events; provided however, that the City shall use reasonable efforts not to unduly interfere with or disrupt Tenant's business. The City shall have the right at any time to change the dimensions and location of any buildings in the Clubhouse and the arrangement and/or locations of entrances, parking areas, sidewalks, landscaped areas, passageways or other parts of the Common Areas and to change the name, number or designation by which the Clubhouse is commonly known. Tenant's use of the Common Areas shall be subject to such rules and regulations as may from time to time be made by the City or General Manager for the safety, comfort and convenience of the owners, occupants, tenants and invitees of said Facility. B. The City and Tenant agree that the City will not be responsible for any loss, theft or damage to vehicles, or the contents thereof, parked or left in the Common Areas. The parking areas shall include those areas designated by the City, in its sole discretion, as either restricted or unrestricted parking areas. Tenant further agrees not to use or permit its employees, visitors or invitees to use the parking areas for overnight storage of vehicles, other than food trucks complying with Article 2, without the prior permission of the City. 10 196887v10 C. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the control, general cleanliness, operation, repair and maintenance of the Common Areas and any changes thereto shall be subject to the City’s sole management and control and the expenditures therefore shall be at the sole discretion of the City. The City shall maintain the Clubhouse in a first-class condition. D. The City shall take reasonable provisions to secure access to the Club Room from other Common Areas of the Clubhouse during non-business hours of the Tenant. E. Tenant shall be responsible for daily, routine and operational cleaning of the Club Room. ARTICLE 8 – COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE AND UTILITIES A. Except as otherwise provided for herein, for its share of Common Area Maintenance ("CAM"), Tenant shall pay as Additional Rent Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) per month. This amount is based on an estimate of costs for the Facility and the Tenant’s expected use of utilities that will not be separately metered. Tenant’s CAM charge shall increase each year of this Lease by two percent (2%). The CAM may change from time to time, if e.g., the Premises area changes due to a lease amendment, Clubhouse is expanded, etc. Tenant's initial CAM Charge is set forth on the Reference Page. CAM payments pursuant to this Article shall be paid in monthly installments as provided in paragraph A of Article 4. 1. "CAM" shall be defined as: all direct costs of operation, maintenance, repair and management of the Clubhouse, as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, including the following costs by way of illustration, but not limitation: insurance charges relating to all insurance policies and endorsements deemed by City to be reasonably necessary or desirable for the protection, preservation or operation of all or any part of the Clubhouse; utility costs for all parts of the Clubhouse shared in common by tenants of the Clubhouse and tenants' utility costs to the extent not separately metered such as natural gas, electricity, water and sewer; the cost of security and alarm services (including any central station signaling system); the cost of maintaining, repairing and replacing any heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems not otherwise being paid for by tenants; trash removal (excluding grease removal); the cost of landscaping and seasonal decorations; the cost of maintaining and repairing any exterior stairway, truck way, loading dock, package pick-up station, pedestrian sidewalk; the cost of maintaining, repairing, operating and policing the buildings and improvements in the Clubhouse, and its appurtenances and equipment, including, without limitation, the roof, common signage, the parking lot and any driveway areas, including the construction and maintenance of lighting facilities therefor, comfort stations and first aid stations, exterior window cleaning costs; labor costs; all management costs including: management fees, if any; employee benefits and payroll taxes; accounting and legal fees; material costs; equipment costs, including the cost of service agreements on equipment; tool costs; the costs of licenses, permits and inspection fees, and any sales, use or service taxes incurred in connection therewith. Excluded are amounts chargeable to specific tenants of the Clubhouse and amounts 11 196887v10 resulting from structural replacements to the exterior of any individual store buildings of the Clubhouse which are normally chargeable to capital account under sound accounting principles. CAM shall not include depreciation or amortization of the Clubhouse or equipment in the Clubhouse except as provided herein, loan principal payments, costs of alterations of tenants' premises, leasing commissions, interest expenses on long-term borrowings, advertising costs or management salaries for executive personnel other than personnel located at the Clubhouse. In addition, City shall be entitled to amortize and include as an additional rental adjustment: (i) an allocable portion of the cost of capital improvement items which are reasonably calculated to reduce operating expenses; (ii) fire sprinklers and suppression systems and other life safety systems; and (iii) other capital expenses which are required under any governmental laws, regulations or ordinances which were not applicable to the Clubhouse at the time it was constructed. All such capital costs shall be amortized over the reasonable life of such improvements in accordance with such reasonable life and amortization schedules as shall be determined by the City in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, with interest on the unamortized amount at one percent (1%) in excess of the prime lending rate announced from time to time as such by U.S. Bank National Association. No ongoing costs of the current construction (noted in Recital C, above) will be included as adjusted rent in this lease, and the parties hereto agree that any increased costs to the City from said construction have already been considered in negotiating the Rent in this Agreement. 2. From the Commencement Date until the Course Re-Opening, the CAM payment due each month shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%). The reduced CAM payment will apply for each month during which the Course Re-Opening has not occurred by the second Sunday of the month. ARTICLE 9 - UTILITIES AND SERVICE A. Commencing with the date on which the City delivers the Premises to Tenant, Tenant shall be responsible for the payment of all separately metered utilities required for the proper operation of Tenant's business, together with all taxes levied or other charges on such utilities and governmental charges based on utility consumption. Tenant shall allow the City any access to the Premises necessary to meter, submeter and/or monitor usage of gas, water, sewer and electricity. Tenant agrees to maintain and clean Premises and keep the same in a sanitary and orderly manner. Tenant shall remove its own organics, recycling and trash and deposit in dumpsters provided by the City adjacent to the Clubhouse. Should Tenant fail to clean and maintain the Premises and remove waste therefrom as required herein, after reasonable written notice to Tenant of the failure and continued failure to so clean and maintain the Premises subsequent to that written notice, the City shall have the right to complete such services and charge Tenant such costs as additional rent. Tenant agrees not to waste any utilities and will adopt affirmative practices and policies so as to maximize a conservative use of all utilities. B. The City agrees to provide the heating, ventilating and air conditioning units ("HVAC") currently servicing the Premises, which shall be maintained by the City, the costs and expenses of which shall be part of CAM. The City will also bear the full cost of any sanitary sewer 12 196887v10 access charges (SAC) assessed to the Facility as a result of the Lease and use of the Premises as a restaurant. C. No temporary interruption or failure of such services incidental to the making of repairs, alterations or improvements, or due to accidents or strike or conditions or events not under the City’s control shall be deemed as an eviction of the Tenant or relieve the Tenant from any of the Tenant's obligations hereunder. D. The Tenant shall pay for all other services it needs to operate on the Premises including telephone and other telecommunications services used in or charged against the Premises during the term of the lease. The Tenant agrees to coordinate these services with the City where reasonably available to promote communication between the City and the Tenant operations and shall allow for maintenance and repair of all apparatus providing such utilities and services provided by the City to the Premises. The Tenant shall be responsible for all maintenance and repair of utilities and other services supplied or ordered solely by the Tenant. E. Prior to installing any equipment in the Premises that generates more than a minimum amount of heat, or places a substantial demand for electrical power on the Clubhouse electrical system, or a substantial demand for utility consumption or transmission of any kind on any system, the Tenant shall obtain the written permission of the City. The City may refuse to grant such permission if the City determines the installation would place an undue burden on the Clubhouse HVAC systems or the amount of power required would place an undue burden on the Clubhouse electrical system, but such permission will not otherwise be unreasonably withheld. F. Tenant shall employ the services of a pest control company to reasonably ensure that the Premises and waste dumpster area for the Clubhouse are free from pests. Tenant shall be responsible for all costs associated with the pest control services. G. The City of Edina is proud of their commitment to energy efficiency – including completely embracing Energy Star products at its facilities. The Tenant must only procure Energy Star rated kitchen equipment, unless approved by the City upon demonstration that the relevant product is cost prohibitive. ARTICLE 10 – TAXES A. Tenant is responsible for and shall pay any sales taxes, personal property taxes, real estate taxes or special assessments incurred by the City or Tenant as a result of this Lease or Tenant’s activities under the Lease, including use of the Executive Clubhouse. B. The Tenant shall be responsible for payment of personal property taxes in the event that they are assessed against Tenant by reason of Tenant’s operations conducted on public property under this Agreement. Tenant shall give written notice of such assessment to the City. C. Failure to pay such taxes when due shall constitute a breach of this Agreement entitling City to terminate this Agreement or the Tenant’s right to possession of the Premises or both, but only after the City has given the Tenant ten days’ notice in writing ordering the Tenant to make said tax payment. 13 196887v10 D. City and Tenant agree that the Property is currently exempt from taxes pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 272.02. In the event taxes are assessed against either the City or Tenant as a result of this Lease and pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 272.01, Tenant shall pay such taxes. The City agrees to cooperate with Tenant to reduce taxes if Tenant contests, protests, petitions for review, or otherwise seeks a reduction of Taxes. During the second through fifth year of the Initial Term of this Lease, if Tenant’s gross sales are Three Hundred Thousand ($300,000.00) Dollars or less for the previous year, then the Tenant shall have the right to request a rent reduction if taxes assessed against the City or Tenant as a result of this Lease and pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 272.01 exceeds Twelve Thousand ($12,000.00) Dollars per annum. The City will not unreasonably withhold consent in granting such reduction. ARTICLE 11 - NON-LIABILITY OF CITY Except in the event of negligence of the City, its agents, employees or contractors, the City shall not be liable for any loss or damage for failure to furnish heat, air conditioning, electricity, water, sprinkler system, sewer or gas service. The City shall not be liable for personal injury, death, unauthorized access or any damage from any cause about the Premises or the Facility except if caused by City’s gross negligence. ARTICLE 12 - CARE OF FACILITY A. Tenant agrees: 1. To keep the Premises in as good condition and repair as they were in at the time of Possession, reasonable wear and tear and damage from fire and other casualty for which insurance is normally procured excepted; 2. To keep the Premises in a safe, clean and sanitary condition and in compliance with all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of governmental authority, or of any company or companies insuring against losses resulting from damage or destruction to the Clubhouse or from personal injuries, deaths or property damage occurring in, on or about the Clubhouse; 3. Not to commit any nuisance or waste on the Premises, overload the Premises or the electrical, water and/or plumbing facilities in the Premises or Facility, throw foreign substances in plumbing facilities, or wastefully use any of the utilities furnished by the City; and 4. To abide by such rules and regulations as may from time to time be reasonably promulgated by the City or General Manager; 5. To maintain a controlled access to the Premises. Tenant shall provide to the General Manager a key to access the Premises. B. If Tenant shall fail to keep and preserve the Premises in the state of condition required by the provisions of this Lease Agreement, after reasonable written notice to Tenant of the 14 196887v10 failure and continued failure to so keep and preserve the Premises subsequent to that written notice, the City may at its option put or cause the same to be put into the condition and state of repair agreed upon, and in such case the Tenant, on demand, shall pay the cost thereof, as additional rent. C The Tenant shall be responsible for maintenance, repair and replacement of all specialty equipment fixtures and furniture used or supplied by the Tenant in the operation of its business on the Premises, including all utility and fire suppression systems within the Premises. D. The City will provide for Tenant’s use an existing double-door refrigerator, double door freezer, and icemaker in the catering kitchen area and a single door refrigerator and display refrigerator in the restaurant kitchen area. Tenant is responsible for all maintenance and repair of these appliances. If these appliances require replacement, Tenant will be responsible for purchasing replacements. E. The City will provide for Tenant’s use 3 walk-in coolers in the restaurant kitchen and a walk-in cooler in the basement of the Clubhouse. Tenant will be responsible for all maintenance and repair of these appliances. The City will be responsible for the cost of replacement of the appliances, if necessary. F. The City shall maintain and repair, at its cost, the roof, structural components of exterior walls (including doors and windows), HVAC equipment, structural parts of the floors, and the exterior components of the Clubhouse. The Tenant shall immediately notify the City, in writing, of the need for repair of items which the City is obligated to maintain and repair, after which time, the City shall have a reasonable opportunity and time to repair same The City liability with respect to any repairs or maintenance for which the City is responsible shall be limited to the City cost of such repair or maintenance. G. Notwithstanding the foregoing allocation of responsibility for repair and maintenance, the Tenant shall bear the expense of any damage to the Premises, whether caused to roof structure, walls, appliances or any other portion of the Premises and Common Areas caused by the Tenant, its officers, employees, agents, or invitees, or their guests. The City shall repair at its expense any damage to the Premises or Common Areas caused by the City, its officers, employees, agents, or attendees of City events. For the purposes of this paragraph, golfers shall be considered City invitees when they enter the Premises for the purpose of purchasing food or beverages. ARTICLE 13 - INSPECTION The City or its employees or agents shall have the right without any diminution of rent or other charges payable hereunder by Tenant to enter the Premises at all reasonable times, upon 24 hours advance notice to Tenant, for the purpose of exhibiting the Premises to prospective tenants or purchasers and/or inspection, cleaning, repairing, testing, altering or improving the same or said Clubhouse, but nothing contained in this Article shall be construed so as to impose any obligation on the City to make any repairs, alterations or improvements. No notice shall be required under this Article in the event of an emergency. 15 196887v10 ARTICLE 14 - ALTERATIONS A. Tenant will not make any alterations, repairs, additions or improvements in or to the Clubhouse or Premises or add, disturb or in any way change any locks, plumbing or wiring therein without the prior written consent of the City as to the character of the alterations, additions or improvements to be made, the manner of doing the work, and the contractor doing the work. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed, if such alterations, repairs, additions or improvements are required of Tenant or are the obligation of Tenant pursuant to this Lease Agreement. All such work shall comply with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. The City as a condition to said consent may require a surety performance and/or payment bond from the Tenant for said actions. Tenant agrees to indemnify and hold the City free and harmless from any liability, loss, cost, damage or expense (including attorneys' fees) by reason of any said alteration, repairs, additions or improvements not performed by the City or its agents, for the remainder of the Term of this Lease. B. By written addendum to this Lease Agreement, the Tenant may make additional improvements to the Clubhouse and adjacent public areas and the costs of such improvements shall be paid in accordance with the applicable addendum. ARTICLE 15 – SIGNS AND ADVERTISING A. The Tenant shall not cause or permit the display of any sign notice or advertising in or about the Premises or Facility without the prior written consent of the City as to the number, size and location of all Tenant signs at the Facility. The City shall have sole discretion whether to approve or disapprove such signage. The Tenant shall remove, at its sole expense, all of its signs or other advertising on or about the Facility prior to vacating the Premises, and shall repair any damage to the Facility caused by such removal. B. Tenant will be allowed a sign on the City’s monument sign and will also be allowed two exterior signs to be attached to the Clubhouse, subject to review and approval by the City. Tenant will pay for its share of the cost for all signs. The City and the Tenant will work together to ensure that any signage on the Clubhouse is consistent with the architectural theme of the Premises. All Tenant signs shall comply with City Codes. C. The Tenant shall maintain its signage in at least as good a condition as the City maintains the rest of the signage for the Clubhouse. D. Tenant’s use of the City or Golf Course logo or reference to the City or Golf Course in its advertising shall be permitted, subject to the review and approval by City prior to use. City’s use of Tenant name or logo shall be permitted, subject to review and approval by Tenant prior to use. Approval under this section shall not be unreasonably denied by either party. 16 196887v10 E. The City shall work cooperatively (but not exclusively) to promote the Tenant to users at other nearby City recreation facilities including the Braemar Golf Dome and the Braemar Ice Arena and Braemar Field. ARTICLE 16 OPERATION, HOURS OF BUSINESS AND MENU A. Tenant shall open for business in the Premises on the Commencement Date and shall operate its business continuously during the term of this lease. Tenant agrees to open the Premises for business and provide food and beverage service each day during the golfing season from at least 6:30 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., unless otherwise agreed upon by the City and Tenant in writing. During the non-golfing season the Premises shall be open and Tenant shall provide food and beverage service at hours agreed to by the City in writing based on Facility usage. Service outside of the hours identified herein is subject to advance notification of and approval by the General Manager or the General Manager’s designee, not to be unreasonably withheld. B. Tenant shall provide restaurant menu items of a consistent quality as offered by at higher end golf course facilities in the twin cities metro area which shall include children’s menu items. C. Tenant shall not provide food, beverages or merchandise to City employees at a discount or without charge, except as otherwise offered to the public generally. D. Tenant shall maximize composting, re-usability and recycling in its restaurant operations, including the kitchen area and customer service areas. E. For the purposes of any on-sale liquor license issued to the Tenant, the licensed area shall include the Premises and be consistent with the license for a golf course. The Tenant shall comply with all federal, state and local laws relative to the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages. Tenant agrees that nothing contained herein shall absolve it from responsibility for full compliance with all laws relative to the sale and distribution of alcoholic beverages. The Tenant shall maintain a liquor license continuously during possession of the Premises under this lease. Failing to maintain a liquor license will be considered a material default of the lease conditions. F. The Tenant shall obtain and maintain during the existence of this Lease all licenses permits or certifications as may be required by law to operate its business in the Premises or on the Golf Course. G. The Tenant will be allowed to cater events at the Clubhouse. H. Tenant shall supply the Facilities Manager with a marketing plan for the Authorized Business Purpose on an annual basis on or before December 15th of each year for the following year. The City and the Tenant agree that the City golf operations and the Tenant restaurant and associated operations are synergistic and that coordination between the two operations is vital to success of both. To that end, the City and the Tenant agree that at least two 17 196887v10 (2) times per year, the Tenant will meet with the City Park and Recreation Director or their designee to discuss overall operations. In addition, the Tenant marketing promotions staff will meet with the City golf operations staff at least once every month to coordinate golf events, cross marketing and promotions and coordination of operational activities. I. The Tenant agrees to observe the City rules and policies for the Facility, Clubhouse, and Premises. The City may amend these rules and policies and such amended rules and policies shall be binding on the Tenant, provided such changes do not contradict the terms and conditions of this Lease. The rules and policies will not unreasonably interfere with the operations of the Tenant as contemplated at the time of the execution of this Lease. J. The City shall furnish the Club Room and Banquet Room with tables and chairs. The number, style, form and color of tables and chairs shall be subject to the mutual approval of the City and Tenant. K. Tenant shall operate a Beverage Cart Service (“Beverage Cart Service”) on the grounds of the Golf Course as follows: (1) Upon Course Re-Opening, Tenant is responsible for providing a minimum of two (2) operational beverage carts for the Beverage Cart Service. Prior to Course Re- Opening, Tenant shall be responsible for operating a single beverage cart on the Academy 9 course. Tenant shall be responsible for all costs associated with the Tenant’s beverage carts. Tenant shall be responsible for replacing any beverage carts. (2) Tenant shall operate beverage carts seven days per week during the golf season. Tenant shall operate at least 2 beverage carts on all Saturdays, Sundays and holidays throughout the golf season. Holidays shall include: Memorial Day, Independence Day and Labor Day. (3) Tenant shall operate beverage carts during the golf course hours such that each round of golf shall have the ability to purchase items from the beverage cart at least once during the round of golf. Tenant is not required to operate beverage carts during inclement weather as determined jointly by Golf Management staff and Tenant. (4) The Beverage Cart Service menu may include non-alcoholic beverages, alcoholic beverages, food items and sundries. Tenant shall establish all prices for goods and services provided by Tenant in the Concession Areas and beverage carts. Prices are anticipated to reflect the premium nature of the service provided while remaining competitive with other local golf courses. The City retains the right to periodically review the price schedules for all food, beverages and other goods to ensure competitive pricing with other golf course concessions, restaurants and catering facilities. Prices of sundries offered by both City and Tenant shall be similarly priced to provide a unified experience to guests. In the event that the City and Tenant disagree on pricing, both parties agree to resolve the disagreement in accordance with the dispute resolution process provided under the terms of the Lease. 18 196887v10 (5) Tenant shall be responsible for obtaining and maintaining a liquor license for serving of alcohol from the beverage carts. (6) Tenants shall train Tenant’s employees in the proper operation of the beverage carts. Tenant shall operate beverage carts within travel routes mutually agreed upon with the Golf Management staff. (7) Tenant may not subcontract all or any portion of the Beverage Cart Service, without the express written consent of the City. (8) The City shall provide a covered parking space for Tenant beverage carts during the golf season and an enclosed parking space during the remainder of the year. (9) As a condition of project financing, the total amount of sales revenue attributed solely to the beverage carts shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total City sales revenue from the Driving Range, Academy Nine and 18-hole course. The Tenant shall track revenues solely attributed to the beverage cart service separately from the Clubhouse sales. At least once per year, the Golf Management staff shall review the beverage cart sales revenue to ensure that it is within the ten percent (10%) limit Tenant and City agree to implement temporary changes to service provided by either or both parties so as to remain within the ten percent (10%) limit for the year. If Tenant and City are unable to reach agreement on any temporary changes in service, both parties agree to resolve the disagreement in accordance with the dispute resolution process provided under the terms of the Lease. L. Tenant shall provide vending services within the Clubhouse at the current locations within the Golf Course: golf course during golf season, Academy 9 Clubhouse and Golf Dome. M. The City will provide Tenant with reasonable notification regarding all tournament and special event functions to be held at the Golf Course related to Tenant’s services. ARTICLE 17 - LOSS BY CASUALTY If more than thirty-three percent (33%) of the Facility or more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the Clubhouse is damaged or destroyed by fire or other casualty, the City shall have the right to terminate this Lease Agreement, provided it gives written notice thereof to Tenant within ninety (90) days after such damage or destruction. If a portion of the Premises is damaged by fire or other casualty, and City does not elect to terminate this Lease Agreement, the City shall, at its expense, restore the Premises to as near the condition which existed immediately prior to such damage or destruction, as reasonably possible, and the rentals shall abate during such period of time as the Premises are untenantable, in the proportion that the untenantable portion of the Premises bears to the entire Premises. 19 196887v10 ARTICLE 18 - WAIVER OF SUBROGATION The City and Tenant hereby release the other from any and all liability or responsibility to the other or anyone claiming through or under them by way of subrogation or otherwise for any loss or damage to property caused by fire or any of the extended coverage or supplementary contract casualties, even if such fire or other casualty shall have been caused by the fault or negligence of the other party, or anyone for whom such party may be responsible; provided however, that this release shall be applicable and in force and effect only with respect to loss or damage occurring during such times as the releasing party's policies shall contain a clause or endorsement to the effect that any such release would not adversely affect or impair said policies or prejudice the right of the releasing party to recover thereunder. The City and Tenant agree that they will request their insurance carriers to include in their policies such a clause or endorsement. If extra cost shall be charged therefor, each party shall advise the other of the amount of the extra cost, and the other party, at its election, may pay the same, but shall not be obligated to do so. ARTICLE 19 - EMINENT DOMAIN If the entire Facility is taken by eminent domain, this Lease Agreement shall automatically terminate as of the date of taking. If a portion of the Facility is taken by eminent domain, the City shall have the right to terminate this Lease Agreement, provided it gives written notice thereof to the Tenant within ninety (90) days after the date of taking. If a portion of the Premises is taken by eminent domain and this Lease Agreement is not terminated by the City, the City shall, at its expense, restore the Premises to as near the condition which existed immediately prior to the date of taking as reasonably possible, and the rentals shall abate during such period of time as the Premises are untenantable, in the proportion that the untenantable portion of the Premises bears to the entire Premises. All damages awarded for such taking under the power of eminent domain shall belong to and be the sole property of the City, irrespective of the basis upon which they are awarded; provided, however, that nothing contained herein shall prevent Tenant from making a separate claim to the condemning authority for its moving expenses and trade fixtures. For purposes of this Article, a taking by eminent domain shall include the City's giving of a deed under threat of condemnation. ARTICLE 20 - SURRENDER On the last day of the Term of this Lease Agreement or on the sooner termination thereof in accordance with the terms hereof, Tenant shall peaceably surrender the Premises in good condition and repair consistent with Tenant's duty to make repairs as provided in Article 12 hereof. On or before said last day, Tenant shall, at its expense, remove all of its portable and detached equipment from the Premises, except as otherwise provided herein, repairing any damage caused thereby, and any property not removed shall be deemed abandoned. All alterations, additions, coolers, freezers, custom-installed appliances, exhaust hoods and fixtures other than Tenant's trade fixtures, which have been made or installed by either the City or Tenant upon the Premises shall remain as the City's property and shall be surrendered with the Premises as a part thereof, or shall be removed by Tenant, at the option of the City, in which event Tenant shall at its expense repair any damage caused thereby. It is specifically agreed that any and all telephonic, coaxial, ethernet, or other computer, word processing, facsimile, or electronic wiring installed by Tenant within the Premises (hereafter "Wiring") shall be removed at Tenant's cost at 20 196887v10 the expiration of the Term, unless the City has specifically requested in writing that said Wiring shall remain, whereupon said Wiring shall be surrendered with the Premises as the City's property. If the Premises are not surrendered at the end of the Term or the sooner termination thereof, Tenant shall indemnify the City against loss or liability resulting from delay by Tenant in so surrendering the Premises, including, without limitation, claims made by any succeeding tenant founded on such delay. Tenant shall promptly surrender all keys for the Premises to the City at the place then fixed for payment of rent and shall inform the City of combinations on any locks and safes on the Premises. ARTICLE 21 - NONPAYMENT OF RENT, DEFAULTS A. If any one or more of the following occurs: (1) a rent payment or any other payment due from Tenant to the City shall be and remain unpaid in whole or in part for more than twenty (20) days after same is due and payable; (2) Tenant shall violate or default on any of the other covenants, agreements, stipulations or conditions herein, or in any parking agreement(s) or other agreements between the City and Tenant relating to the Premises, and such violation or default shall continue for a period of twenty (20) days after written notice from the City of such violation or default; or (3) if Tenant shall commence or have commenced against Tenant proceedings under a bankruptcy, receivership, insolvency or similar type of action, then it shall be optional for the City, without further notice or demand, to cure such default or to declare this Lease Agreement forfeited and the said Term ended, the liability of Tenant for the rent and all other sums provided herein shall not be relinquished or extinguished for the balance of the Term of this Lease Agreement, and the City shall be entitled to periodically sue Tenant for all sums due under this Lease Agreement or which become due prior to judgment, but such suit shall not bar subsequent suits for any further sums coming due thereafter. Tenant shall be responsible for, in addition to the rentals and other sums agreed to be paid hereunder, the cost of any necessary maintenance, repair, restoration, reletting (including related cost of removal or modification of tenant improvements) or cure, as well as reasonable attorneys' fees incurred or awarded in any suit or action instituted by the City to enforce the provisions of this Lease Agreement, regain possession of the Premises, or the collection of the rentals due the City hereunder. Tenant agrees to pay interest at the highest permissible rate of interest allowed under the usury statutes of the State of Minnesota, or in case no such maximum rate of interest is provided, at the rate of fifteen percent (15%) per annum, on all rentals and other sums due the City hereunder not paid within twenty (20) days from the date same become due and payable. Each right or remedy of the City provided for in this Lease Agreement shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other right or remedy provided for in this Lease Agreement now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. B. If the Tenant defaults three (3) times within any twelve (12) month period and receives a notice of default from the City, then regardless of whether such defaults are, or have been, timely cured, the City may, at its sole option, be entitled to terminate this lease by giving sixty (60) days written notice to the Tenant. ARTICLE 22 - CITY'S DEFAULT The City shall not be deemed to be in default under this Lease Agreement until Tenant has given the City written notice specifying the nature of the default and the City does not cure 21 196887v10 such default within fifteen (15) business days after receipt of such notice or within such reasonable time thereafter as may be necessary to cure such default where such default is of such a character as to reasonably require more than fifteen (15) business days to cure. ARTICLE 23 - HOLDING OVER Tenant will, at the expiration of this Lease Agreement, whether by lapse of time or termination, give up immediate possession to the City. If Tenant fails to give up possession the City may, at its option, serve written notice upon Tenant that such holdover constitutes any one of (i) renewal of this Lease Agreement for one year, and from year to year thereafter, or (ii) creation of a month-to-month tenancy, or (iii) creation of a tenancy at sufferance. If the City does not give said notice, Tenant's holdover shall create a tenancy at sufferance. In any such event the tenancy shall be upon the terms and conditions of this Lease Agreement, except that the Minimum Rental shall be double the Minimum Rental Tenant was obligated to pay the City under this Lease Agreement immediately prior to termination (in the case of tenancy at sufferance such Minimum Rental shall be prorated on the basis of a 365 day year for each day Tenant remains in possession); excepting further that in the case of a tenancy at sufferance, no notices shall be required prior to commencement of any legal action to gain repossession of the Premises. In the case of a tenancy at sufferance, Tenant shall also pay to the City all damages sustained by the City resulting from retention of possession by Tenant. The provisions of this paragraph shall not constitute a waiver by the City of any right of reentry as otherwise available to the City; nor shall receipt of any rent or any other act consistent with continued tenancy operate as a waiver of the right to terminate this Lease Agreement for a breach by Tenant hereof. ARTICLE 24 - SUBORDINATION Tenant agrees that this Lease Agreement shall be subordinate to any mortgage(s) that may now or hereafter be placed upon the Facility or any part thereof, and to any and all advances to be made thereunder, and to the interest thereon, and all renewals, replacements, and extensions thereof, provided the mortgagee named in such mortgage(s) shall agree to recognize this Lease Agreement or Tenant in the event of foreclosure provided the Tenant is not in default. In confirmation of such subordination, Tenant shall promptly execute and deliver any instrument, in recordable form, as required by a landlord mortgagee. In the event of any mortgagee electing to have the Lease Agreement a prior encumbrance to its mortgage, then and in such event upon such mortgagee notifying Tenant to that effect, this Lease Agreement shall be deemed prior in encumbrance to the said mortgage, whether this Lease Agreement is dated prior to or subsequent to the date of said mortgage. ARTICLE 25 - INDEMNITY, INSURANCE AND SECURITY A. Tenant will keep in force at its own expense for so long as this Lease Agreement remains in effect public liability insurance with respect to the Premises in which the City shall be named as an additional insured, in companies and in form acceptable to the City with a minimum combined limit of liability of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00). This limit shall apply per location. Said insurance shall also provide for contractual liability coverage by endorsement. Tenant shall further provide for business interruption insurance to cover a period of not less than six (6) months. Tenant will further deposit with the City the policy or policies of such insurance or certificates thereof, or other acceptable evidence that such insurance is in effect, which 22 196887v10 evidence shall provide that the City shall be notified in writing thirty (30) days prior to cancellation, material change, or failure to renew the insurance. Tenant further covenants and agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its officers, employees and agents harmless for any claim, loss or damage, including reasonable attorney's fees, suffered by the City, the City's employees or the City's other tenants caused by: i) any act or omission by Tenant, Tenant's employees or anyone claiming through or by Tenant in, at, or around the Premises or the Facility; ii) the conduct or management of any work or thing whatsoever done by Tenant in or about the Premises or from transactions of the Tenant concerning the Premises; or iii) Tenant's failure to comply with any and all governmental laws, rules, ordinances or regulations applicable to the use of the Premises and its occupancy. Tenant shall also comply with all applicable state and local laws, statutes, ordinances and regulations, including applicable provisions of Minn. Stat. §340A.408 et. seq. regarding dispensing or selling of alcohol in the event Tenant should ever obtain license to sell beer and/or wine; and Tenant shall at all times maintain such "dram shop insurance" having limits in compliance with the provisions of Minn. Stat. §340A.409. If Tenant shall not comply with its covenants made in this Article 25, the City may, at its option, cause insurance as aforesaid to be issued and in such event Tenant agrees to pay the premium for such insurance promptly upon the City's demand. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant shall not sell or dispense beer, wine, liquor or any other alcoholic beverages from the Premises without the prior consent of the City, which consent the City may grant or withhold for any or no reason. B. Tenant shall be responsible for the security and safeguarding of the Premises and all property kept, stored or maintained in the Premises. The City will make available to Tenant, at Tenant's request, the plans and specifications for construction of the Premises. Tenant represents that it is satisfied that the construction of the Premises, including the floors, walls, windows, doors and means of access thereto are suitable for the particular needs of Tenant's business. Tenant further represents that it is satisfied with the security of the Clubhouse and Premises for the protection of any property which may be owned, held, stored or otherwise caused or permitted by Tenant to be present upon the Premises, including the City’s method of securing the Club Room to restrict access from other common areas of the Clubhouse during non-business hours of the Tenant. The placement and sufficiency of all safes, vaults, cash or security drawers, cabinets or the like placed upon the Premises by Tenant shall be at the sole responsibility and risk of Tenant. Tenant shall maintain in force throughout the Term, insurance upon all contents of the Premises, including that owned by others and Tenant's equipment and any alterations, additions, fixtures, or improvements in the Premises acknowledged by the City to be the Tenant's. C. The City shall carry and cause to be in full force and effect a fire and extended coverage insurance policy on the Facility, but not Tenant's merchandise, trade fixtures, furnishings, operating equipment, wall, floor and window coverings, nor any other contents owned, leased or otherwise in possession of Tenant. The cost of such insurance shall be a CAM expense. 23 196887v10 ARTICLE 26 - NOTICES All notices from Tenant to the City required or permitted by any provisions of this Lease Agreement shall be directed to the City postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, at the address provided for the City in the preamble to this Lease Agreement or at such other address as Tenant shall be advised to use by the City. All notices from the City to Tenant required or permitted by any provision of this Lease Agreement shall be directed to Tenant, postage prepaid, certified or registered mail, at the Premises and at the address, if any, set forth on the signature page of this Lease Agreement. The City and Tenant shall each have the right at any time and from time to time to designate one (1) additional party to whom copies of any notice shall be sent. ARTICLE 27 - APPLICABLE LAW This Lease Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARTICLE 28 - MECHANICS’ LIEN In the event any mechanic's lien shall at any time be filed against the Premises or any part of the Facility by reason of work, labor, services or materials performed or furnished to Tenant or to anyone holding the Premises through or under Tenant, Tenant shall forthwith cause the same to be discharged of record. If Tenant shall fail to cause such lien forthwith to be discharged within five (5) days after being notified of the filing thereof, then, in addition to any other right or remedy of the City, City may, but shall not be obligated to, discharge the same by paying the amount claimed to be due, or by bonding, and the amount so paid by the City and all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees incurred by the City in procuring the discharge of such lien, shall be due and payable in full by Tenant to the City on demand. ARTICLE 29 - SECURITY INTEREST Tenant hereby grants to the City a security interest in all goods, chattels, fixtures and personal property belonging to Tenant, except for food trucks, which now is or may hereafter be placed in the Premises, to secure all rents due hereunder and all other covenants and obligations of Tenant hereunder. In the event there exists any security interest in said property which security interest is paramount and superior to the security interest herein created, the City may satisfy said paramount security interest, and all sums paid in satisfying said security interest will be considered additional sums owed the City by Tenant hereunder. Tenant hereby acknowledges receipt of a true, full and complete copy of this Lease Agreement. The City, in the event of a default by Tenant of any covenant or condition herein contained, may exercise, in addition to any rights and remedies herein granted, all the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code or any other applicable law. Tenant agrees upon request of the City to execute and deliver to the City a financing statement evidencing such security interest. A copy of this Lease Agreement may be filed as a financing statement. ARTICLE 30 - BROKERAGE Each of the parties represents and warrants that there are no claims for brokerage commissions or finder's fees in connection with this Lease Agreement, and agrees to indemnify 24 196887v10 the other against, and hold it harmless from all liabilities arising from any such claim, including without limitation, the cost of attorney's fees in connection therewith. ARTICLE 31 - ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATES Each party hereto agrees that at any time, and from time to time during the Term of this Lease Agreement (but not more often than twice in each calendar year), within ten (10) days after request by the other party hereto, it will execute, acknowledge and deliver to such other party or to any prospective purchaser, assignee or mortgagee designated by such other party, an estoppel certificate in a form acceptable to the City. Tenant agrees to provide the City (but not more often than twice in any calendar year), within fifteen (15) days of request, the then most current financial statements of Tenant and any guarantors of this Lease Agreement, which shall be certified by Tenant, and if available, shall be audited and certified by a certified public accountant. The City shall keep such financial statements confidential, except the City shall, in confidence, be entitled to disclose such financial statements to existing or prospective mortgagees or purchasers of the Facility. ARTICLE 32 - GENERAL This Lease Agreement does not create the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint venture or of any association between the City and Tenant, the sole relationship between the City and Tenant being that of the City and Tenant. No waiver of any default of Tenant hereunder shall be implied from any omission by the City to take any action on account of such default if such default persists or is repeated, and no express waiver shall affect any default other than the default specified in the express waiver and that only for the time and to the extent therein stated. The covenants of Tenant to pay Rent and the Additional Rental are each independent of any other covenant, condition, or provision contained in this Lease Agreement. The marginal or topical headings of the several Articles, paragraphs and clauses are for convenience only and do not define, limit or construe the contents of such Articles, paragraphs or clauses. All provisions hereof shall be binding upon the heirs, successors and assigns of each party hereto. No receipt or acceptance by the City from Tenant of less than the monthly rent herein stipulated shall be deemed to be other than a partial payment on account for any due and unpaid stipulated rent; no endorsement or statement of any check or any letter or other writing accompanying any check or payment of rent to the City shall be deemed an accord and satisfaction, and the City may accept and negotiate such check or payment without prejudice to the City's rights to (i) recover the remaining balance of such unpaid rent or (ii) pursue any other remedy provided in this Lease Agreement. Neither party shall record this Lease Agreement nor any memorandum thereof, and any such recordation shall be a breach of this Lease Agreement void, and without effect. Submission of this instrument for examination does not constitute a reservation of or option for the Premises and this Lease Agreement shall become effective only upon execution and delivery thereof by the City and Tenant. ARTICLE 33 - EXCULPATION Tenant agrees to look solely to the City’s interest in the Facility for the recovery of any judgment from the City, it being agreed that the City and the City's officials, employees, and agents shall never be personally liable for any such judgment. 25 196887v10 ARTICLE 34 - CONTINGENCIES The City's obligations under this Lease Agreement are expressly contingent upon the following items: (a) the City securing all required approvals to entitle the project; (b) approval of the Edina City Council of the project; and (c) approval of the Edina City Council of this Lease Agreement. ARTICLE 35 – DISPUTE RESOLUTION In the event that a dispute arises under this Lease that is not deemed a default and that the parties cannot resolve, they shall allow the dispute to be decided by a Dispute Panel in the following manner: each party to this Lease shall appoint one person who is not involved in the dispute to the Dispute Panel and the members so appointed shall jointly appoint an additional member to the Dispute Panel. The Dispute Panel shall review the facts, Lease terms and applicable statutes, rules and policies, and make a determination of the dispute. The determination of the Dispute Panel shall be final and binding on the parties hereto. ARTICLE 36 – SUBLETTING AND ASSIGNMENT The Tenant shall not have the right to transfer, assign, sublease, or license the Premises or any portion thereof without the prior written consent of the City which consent may not be unreasonably denied. A transfer under this Article shall not prohibit Tenant’s transfer of all of Tenant’s stock or assets to an entity in which Tenant owns greater than a fifty percent (50%) interest. ARTICLE 37 – MISCELLANEOUS A. Time is of the Essence. The Tenant’s performance of its obligations under this Lease is a condition as well as a covenant. Time is of the essence in the performance of all conditions and covenants. B. Non-discrimination. The Tenant agrees that while using the Premises as allowed by this Lease the Tenant will not discriminate against any person upon the basis of race, creed, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, veteran status, or physical or mental disability. C. Data Practices. As a tenant of the City, the Tenant will comply with the Minnesota Data Practices Act (“Act”) as it may apply to the Tenant rights under this Lease. The City will cooperate with the Tenant in complying with the Act. If the Tenant receives a data request under the Act, the Tenant shall immediately notify the City compliance official who will work with the Tenant in responding to the request in a reasonable manner and time frame. D. Authority to Execute. The individual executing this Lease on behalf of the Tenant hereby represents that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Lease on behalf of the Tenant and that this Lease shall be binding upon said entity in accord with its terms. E. Entire Agreement. This Agreement restates the entire understandings and agreements between the parties, whether oral or written, and supersedes all prior agreements and 26 196887v10 amendments thereto. This Agreement may be amended only in writing, signed by the parties hereto. This Agreement is binding on the parties hereto their assigns and successors. F. Severability. If any portion of this Agreement is found invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction all other provisions remain in full force and effect. G. Counterparts. This Lease may be executed in counterparts and each counterpart constitutes an original document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written. [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank. Signature pages follow.] 27 196887v10 CITY OF EDINA By:________________________________ James Hovland, Mayor By:_________________________________ Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ______ day of __________________, 2018, by James Hovland and Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. ______________________________________ Notary Public 28 196887v10 O’REILLY CUSTOM 4, LLC By: Matty O’Reilly Its _____________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of __________________, 2018, by Matty O’Reilly, the _______________________ of O’Reilly Custom 4, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. __________________________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell, Knutson Professional Association Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: 651-452-5000] AMP 29 196887v10 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Golf Course Property The following described land situated in the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota: The South 1/2 of the Northeast Quarter; The South 10 acres of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, except that part thereof lying Northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said South 10 acres, distant 790 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof; thence Southwesterly at an angle of 34 degrees with said North line a distance of 273 feet; thence Northwesterly to a point on the West line of said South 10 acres, distant 64 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof and there terminating; The West 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter excepting the West 550 feet thereof; and except that part thereof lying West of the Easterly line of a strip of land lying within a distance of 112.5 feet on each side of a center line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of Section 18, Township 116, Range 21, distant 852.5 feet East of the Northwest corner of said Section; thence Southeasterly at an angle of 73 degrees and 42 minutes (as measured from East to South) a distance of 200 feet; thence deflect to the right at an angle of 180 degrees a distance of 100 feet to actual point of beginning of line to be described; thence continue on said course a distance of 894.4 feet; thence deflect to the right along a 1 degree 30 minute curve (delta angle 17 degrees 27 minutes, tangent distance 586.2 feet) a distance of 1163.3 feet and there terminating; The East 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter; All of the Southeast Quarter; The South 1/2 of the Northwest Quarter except that part thereof lying between the North line of said South 1/2 of the Northwest Quarter and the center line of County Road Number 39 and except the West 950 feet thereof, all in Section 7, Township 116, Range 21. Subject to a power line easement in favor of Northern States Power Company over the South 20 feet of Section 7, Township 116, Range 21, as granted and set forth in paragraph II of that certain stipulation dated October 18, 1951, filed November 8, 1951 executed by and between Samuel G. Smilow as attorney for F.J. Hays and W.S. Hooper attorney for Northern States Power Company as set forth in deed of record in Book 1051 of Deeds, page 639. Together with 3 public road easements in a width of at least 60 feet over and across the following described property to-wit: The West 550 feet of the Southwest 1/4 and the West 950 feet of the South 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 lying South of the center line of County Road No. 39, all in Section 7, Township 116, Range 21 as shown in deed Doc No 528524. See instrument as to termination of said easements. 30 196887v10 EXHIBIT B Premises Tenant Premises – Main Level Restaurant Kitchen – 1,978 square feet – Green Banquet Kitchen – 364 square feet – Red Banquet Room & Bar – 3,452 square feet – Orange Banquet Deck – 1,118 square feet – Blue Total Tenant Premises – Main Level – 6,912 square feet 31 196887v10 Tenant Premises – Lower Level Dry Storage Kitchen – 108 square feet – Green Dry Storage Beverage Cart – 91 square feet – Green Walk-in Cooler Beverage Cart – 50 square feet – Green Total Tenant Premises – Lower Level – 249 square feet 32 196887v10 EXHIBIT C Common Areas Common Areas – Main Level Restrooms – 330 square feet – Pink Banquet Entrance – 670 square feet – Pink Restaurant Front Patio – 920 square feet – Pink Clubroom – 1,140 square feet – Pink Restaurant Deck – 2,241 square feet – Pink Total Common Areas – Main Level – 5,301 square feet Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: O ther F rom:James B. Hovland, Mayor Item Activity: Subject:Edina G irls Hockey Team 2018 S tate C hampions R ecognition Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. I N TR O D U C TI O N: I 've invited the E dina Girls Hockey Team to attend the Council M eeting on May 15 so we can recognize their achievement in winning the 2018 State Championship. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: O ther F rom:Tom M. S c hmitz, F ire C hief Item Activity: Subject:P roclamation: 2018 EMS Week Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt 2018 E mergency M edical Services (E M S ) Week P roclamation I N TR O D U C TI O N: M ay 20-26, 2018, is the 44th annual N ational E M S Week. In 1974, P resident G erald Ford authorized E M S Week to celebrate E M S practitioners and the important work they do in our nation's communities. E M S Week brings together local communities and medical personnel to honor the dedication of those who provide the day-to- day lifesaving services of medicine's "front line." E M S Week is the perfect time to recognize E M S and all that its practitioners do for our nation. AT TAC HME N T S: Description 2018 EMS Week PROCLAMATION EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK MAY 20 – 26, 2018 EMS STRONG: STRONGER TOGETHER WHEREAS, emergency medical services is a vital public service; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services has grown to fill a gap by providing important, out of hospital care, including preventative medicine, follow-up care, and access to telemedicine; and WHEREAS, the emergency medical services system consists of first responders, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, emergency medical dispatchers, firefighters, police officers, educators, administrators, pre-hospital nurses, emergency nurses, emergency physicians, trained members of the public, and other out of hospital medical care providers; and WHEREAS, the members of emergency medical services teams, whether career or volunteer, engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of emergency medical services providers by designating Emergency Medical Services Week. NOW THEREFORE, the Edina City Council in recognition of this event does hereby proclaim the week of MAY 20-26, 2018 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK With the theme, EMS Strong: Stronger Together, we encourage the community to observe this week with appropriate programs, ceremonies and activities. Dated this 15th day of May, 2018. _______________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.C . To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Dave Nels on, C hief of P olice Item Activity: Subject:P roclamation: 2018 National P olice Week P roclamation Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt the attached P roclamation of N ational P olice Week in the C ity of Edina for the week of May 13-19, 2018. I N TR O D U C TI O N: I n 1962, P resident John F. K ennedy signed a proclamation which designated May 15 as P eace Officers M emorial D ay and the week in which that date falls as P olice Week. Currently, tens of thousands of law enforcement officers from around the world converge on Washington, D .C ., to participate in a number of planned events which honor those that have paid the ultimate sacrifice. Let this be a time to thank and honor those who dedicate their lives to serving the public. I t is a week that should be set aside so everyone can be made aware of their hard work and dedication of the officers of the Edina P olice Department. AT TAC HME N T S: Description 2018 National Police Week Proclamation PROCLAMATION NATIONAL POLICE WEEK 2018 WHEREAS the week of May 13–19, 2018, is National Police Week in the United States; and WHEREAS there are approximately 900,000 law enforcement officers service in communities across the United States, including the dedicated members of the Edina Police Department; and WHEREAS over 58,000 assaults against law enforcement officers are reported each year, resulting in approximately 17,000 injuries; and WHEREAS since the first recorded death in 1791, a total of 21,541 law enforcement officers in the United States have made the ultimate sacrifice and been killed in the line of duty; and WHEREAS the names of these dedicated public servants are engraved on the walls of the National Law Enforcement Memorial in Washington, D.C., and WHEREAS 360 new names of fallen heroes are being added to the National Law Enforcement Memorial this spring, including 129 officers killed in 2017 and 231 officers who died in previous years but whose stories of sacrifice had been lost to history until now; and WHEREAS the service and sacrifice of all officers killed in the line of duty will be honored during the National Law Enforcement Officer Memorial Fund’s 30th Annual Candlelight Vigil, on May 13, 2018, in Washington, D.C.; and WHEREAS the Candlelight Vigil is part of National Police Week, which takes place this year on May 13– 19; and WHEREAS May 15 is designated as Peace Officers Memorial Day, in honor of all the fallen officers and their families and U.S. Flags should be flown at half-staff; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, MN, hereby proclaims May 13-19, 2018, as NATIONAL POLICE WEEK In the City of Edina, MN, and call upon the people of Edina to observe this week in honor of the men and women whose diligence and professionalism keep the residents and City of Edina safe. Dated this 15th day of May, 2018. _______________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: O ther F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:P roclamation: P res ervation Month May 2018 and 2018 Edina Heritage Award Action C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt the P roclamation for P reservation M onth, May 2018. Award the 2018 Edina H eritage Award to the M ueller Residence at 6400 P arnell Avenue South. I N TR O D U C TI O N: None AT TAC HME N T S: Description Proclamation Poster 6400 Parnell Avenue Nomination 6400 Parell Avenue Photos PROCLAMATION PRESERVATION MONTH MAY 2018 WHEREAS, historic preservation is an effective tool for managing growth and sustainable development, revitalizing neighborhoods, fostering local pride and maintaining community character while enhancing livability; and WHEREAS, historic preservation is relevant for communities across the nation, both urban and rural, and for Americans of all ages, all walks of life, and all ethnic backgrounds; and WHEREAS, it is important to celebrate the role of history in our lives and the contributions made by dedicated individuals in helping to preserve the tangible aspects of the heritage that has shaped us as a people; and WHEREAS, “This Place Matters” is the theme for Preservation Month 2018, sponsored by the Edina Heritage Preservation Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, we, the City Council of the City of Edina, do proclaim May 2018, as Preservation Month, and call upon the people of Edina to join their fellow citizens in recognizing and participating in this special observance. Dated this 15th day of May 2018. ________________________ James B. Hovland Mayor May is Historic Preservation Month! Created in 1971 by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Preservation Month is observed by small towns and big cities across the country. Since 2002 the Edina Heritage Preservation Commission has sponsored educational programs and award ceremonies. For additional information, please contact Emily Bodeker at 952-826-0462 or ebodeker@edinamn.gov, or visit bit.ly/HeritageLandmarks. May is Preservation Month, a celebration of all things heritage in Edina. The theme for this year's celebration, "This Place Matters," puts a spotlight on efforts to preserve, protect, and enhance Edina's cultural and historical resources. 1 Emily Bodeker From:noreply@civicplus.com Sent:Wednesday, March 28, 2018 12:12 PM To:Emily Bodeker Subject:Online Form Submittal: Heritage Award Nomination Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Heritage Award Nomination Nominations are now being accepted for the 2018 Heritage Award.The Heritage Award is given to a local business, person or neighborhood for their commitment to preserving, rehabilitating or restoring a historical place in Edina. The Edina Heritage Award is given to an individual, family, company or organization that has contributed to the historic fabric of the community and made an outstanding contribution to the preservation, rehabilitation, restoration and use of Edina’s heritage resource. The heritage resource must be located in the City of Edina. The deadline to submit a nomination is 4:30 p.m. Wednesday, April 11. Nominations can also be mailed to the Edina Heritage Award, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. Submitter First Name Bob Submitter Last Name Moore Preferred Phone Number Preferred Email (Section Break) Name of Property Mueller Residence Owner of Property Nate and Tiffany Mueller Email Address Address of Property 6400 Parnell Avenue South City Edina State MN Zip Code 55435 Fax Number none 2 Reason: What was done to preserve and/or restore the historic integrity of the nominated property? Nate and Tiffany Mueller are both designers who were living on the west coast, where mid-century homes were everywhere. As they both have always loved 50s and 60s architecture, they knew that was what they wanted when they moved the family back to Minnesota. Having looked at available properties online, they had daily alerts set up to email them when new homes were posted in Edina and a few other cities. Among their email alerts was the property at 6400 Parnell. But, there were no pictures—just a date of construction (1964), so they knew there was a chance that it would be a mid-century gem. Tiffany then looked it up on Google Street View and saw the outside of the house with the amazing A frame window that was a staple of that era of architecture. Immediately, they set up a time for their realtor to walk through the home and FaceTime video the property with Nate and Tiffany so they could see the inside. They were blown away by the bones of the house. It was one of the most incredible homes they had ever seen and knew that moment that they wanted it. Upon their offer being accepted, it was Tiffany who made the trip to Minnesota for the closing and final inspection and to physically walk through the house for the first time! The downside of their purchase was that the home had not been cared for; it had rotting siding and soffits, there were drainage issues with rainwater leaking into the basement, the bathrooms hadn't been touched since the home was first built and had mold growing in the walls and even some mold growing in the kitchen cupboards. The landscaping hadn't been touched in years and was overgrown covering much of the front of the house first floor. Recently Nate and Tiffany were told by their neighbor that the owners were selling the house as a tear down. The Mueller’s decided that it was going to be their project to restore this home to its original glory while adding their personal stamp on it. They’ve had all the siding replaced and repainted the house to a period appropriate charcoal color. They updated both upstairs bathrooms to remove the mold while adding period appropriate light fixtures and vanities. They are about to undertake gutting the kitchen and revive it to be an amazing gathering place for family and guests. They also plan to update the entire home piece by piece to continue to revive it back to its original glory. Nate and Tiffany know a lot of care and thought went into building this house and they want to honor that by bringing it back to life and creating a home their family will stay in as their forever home. To document their journey of restoration and updating, Tiffany started an almost monthly blog: “HelloRefuge.com”. Here, she writes and documents with photos the transformation of their amazing home. With her great eye for interior design, Tiffany’s Instagram photos of the renovation caught the eye of the editor 3 of ‘Atomic Ranch’ magazine, a national publication published quarterly that features stunning mid-century homes from around the United States. The Mueller home is currently featured in a 12-page spread of the latest issue! Image Upload 6400 Winter.JPG Image Upload 6400 1972.JPG Image Upload 6400 living room.png Professionals (if any) involved in the project; please provide contact information for any realtors, architects, builders, designers, or other professionals. Owners Nate and Tiffany Mueller are both designers Data Advisory I understand that some of the information provided in this form will be public data. Public data is available to anyone who makes a request for such information. Acknowledgment I understand the public data advisory Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Brian O ls on, P ublic Works Direc tor Item Activity: Subject:P roclamation: 2018 National P ublic Works Week Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion adopting proclamation. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T his year National P ublic Works Week celebrates the "P ower of P ublic Works". T he theme gives voice to the impact many facets of public works have on modern civilization. F rom providing clean water to disposing of solid waste, to building roads and bridges or planning for and implementing mass transit, to removing snow on roadways or devising emergency management strategies to meet natural or manmade disasters, public works services determine a society’s quality of life. . http://www.apwa.net/. AT TAC HME N T S: Description 2018 National Public Works Week Proclamation City of Edina Proclamation WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens’ everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, and streets; and WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design, and construction, is vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill of public works official; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people’s attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform, NOW THEREFORE, I, James Hovland, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the week of May 20-26, 2018, as “National Public Works Week” in the City of Edina, and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort, and quality of life. Dated: May 15, 2018 James B. Hovland, Mayor Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.F. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:MJ Lamon, P rojec t C oordinator Item Activity: Subject:R ace & Equity F inal R eport & R ecommendations Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. I N TR O D U C TI O N: Edina's R ace and E quity initiative started in F ebruary 2017. T he Task F orce and three working groups convened in M arch 2017 and completed recommendations in April 2018. T he Task Force has provided the final report for C ouncil's review. T he Task Force has a presentation to share with C ouncil and is prepared to address questions. AT TAC HME N T S: Description R & E Final Report and Recommendations Race & Equity Initiative Final Report & Recommendations May 15, 2018 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 2 PREPARED BY Edina Race & Equity Task Force James Pierce, Co-Chair Jessica Kingston, Co-Chair Chris Smith Leonel Dorvil Ramla Hasanali Michelle Meek Katherine Bass Thuy Anh Fox City Staff MJ Lamon, Race & Equity Staff Liaison Consultant Citizens League 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Five Themes -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 Appendix ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Implementation Recommendation --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 The City of Edina Overview ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 Experiences -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Race and Equity Task Force ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 14 Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE) -------------------------------------------------------------------- 17 The Approach--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 The Orange Method --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 Research Methodologies --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 Timeline of Community Input & Data ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 Summary Findings --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 Overview of Community Data Collection------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 Demographic Information Collected ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 22 Community Findings ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 24 Experiences, Observations, and Awareness of Race-Based Discrimination ----------------------------------- 24 Summary of Community Reactions/Responses to Race-Based Discrimination ------------------------------- 29 Where Do Community Members Feel and Not Feel a Sense of Belonging in Edina? ------------------------ 32 City Government Findings and Recommendations --------------------------------------------------------------------- 36 Recommendations Summary --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 36 Twenty-One Recommendations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 36 Next Steps & Conclusion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44 After the Final Report ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 44 Appendix--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 45 4 Executive Summary Change happens when people recognize (i) why change is needed; (ii) understand that the proposed solutions are attainable; and (iii) have a shared vision of the challenges and opportunities in making lasting change. In 2016, Edina’s city council recognized long term racial inequities have manifested in our community for decades. These inequities have prevented Edina from realizing its vision and values for all community members. Change was needed in the city’s policies and procedures with respect to the operation of its facilities, institutions and services. The city wanted to take a proactive approach to identify, repair and prevent future disparate outcomes in our community. Thirty community members were appointed to serve on the Race and Equity Task Force and Working Groups to assess each of these areas and develop recommendations to address issues of race and inequity within the City. Over the past 18 months, we have worked to assess the City’s facilities, institutions and services. To assist in the framing content, we have categorized the recommendations into five themes; (i) Accountability; (ii) Building Relationships with Communities of Color; (iii) Gather Data; (iv) Belonging (community feeling); and (v) Policies. Each theme has a summary and is accompanied by a unique identifier of each specific recommendation. We have included each original recommendation submitted by the working groups and any data sources we felt were pertinent to understanding the original intent expressed within each recommendation. Five Themes Accountability We believe success requires a high degree of commitment and accountability from both City Council and City Staff. The recommendations which are associated with the accountability theme are generally related to ensuring we have the adequate resources to maintain the level of commitment we believe is required to achieve the desired outcomes. Associated Recommendations: TF-1, I-4, F-3, I-8, I-11, S-3, S-4 Building Relationships with Communities of Color The recommendations associated with this theme represent the most frequently mentioned pain points across all data sources. These tend to pertain to the most public-facing city functions. Associated Recommendations: I-5, I-6, S-8, S-2, F-2 5 Gather Data Many recommendations include a theme of 1) collecting new or different data and/or 2) analyzing and reporting on existing data in a way that helps us understand the difference in experiences of residents of color. Understanding those differences is critical first step to addressing them. Associated Recommendations: I-3, S-1, I-8, I-7, I-9, I-10, S-5, I-1, I-2, S-6, S-9, S-10, S-7, S-11 Belonging (community feeling) Again and again, community members talked about not feeling welcome or a sense of belonging in the City. Recommendations associated with this theme address this feeling by taking concrete steps to address – for example - inclusion in city staffing, communications and appointments. Associated Recommendations: TF-2, I-4, F-3, S-1, I-6, S-8, F-1, F-2, S-11 Policies Task Force and Working Group members understood that the City’s efforts have to focus on policy and institutional strategies that create and maintain inequities. This includes outward, public facing city business as well as the many invisible, behind the scenes ways that we conduct day-to-day work. Associated Recommendations: I-3, I-5, I-6, I-9, S-8, S-3, I-1, I-2, S-7 Appendix The appendix includes any document or information used as data sources for working group recommendations. Implementation Recommendation We have a responsibility to fix the racial inequities now to achieve the City’s Budget Goal: Foster Inclusive and Engaged Community. All the recommendations should be implemented by the City. There are recommendations that are community facing and recommendations that are targeting both implicit and explicit racial biases. Many recommendations also address how we interact with City Government and how we address the decades of systems, polices, practices and procedures that continue to perpetuate racial inequities in our community. This is a complex problem. It is because of this complexity that a comprehensive effort is required. To choose a subset of recommendations, while excluding others, would further propagate the many factors that brought us here today. With that backdrop, we do believe it is very important that we are fast first movers. We would recommend a balanced set of first actions, bold first steps that suggest we mean business. This set of recommendations are very visible to the community and would begin to change the tone. This could include aspects of: TF-1 TF-2 I-3 I-4 I-5 F-1 F-3 F-2 S-2 6 We would recommend that in parallel, we also begin focusing on how we address other less visible but systemic issues. Addressing these issues will give us the sustainability we need. This could include aspects of: I-1 I-4 I-7 I-10 S-1 S-3 S-4 This approach would provide a meaningful beginning and frames a way forward to sustain our success. The final suggestion is that as you assess all recommendations, find those that you believe can be incorporated in your current department goals. Doing so should allow for each recommendation to have a home and if we execute on the accountability recommendations, we now can ensure that all recommendations are executed within a reasonable timeframe. 7 Introduction The City of Edina Overview Background Edina is a first-ring suburb southwest of Minneapolis. It is known as a highly desirable community due to its close proximity to Minneapolis, its academic institutions, its well-appointed homes, and plentiful amenities such as parks, retail, and restaurants. The city is often highly ranked for its safety, quality of life, and public school district. Many take immense pride in being a part of the Edina community, which includes a strong sense of achievement and excellence in all facets of family and community life. This desirability is a driving factor in Edina’s continued development and growth. The city bounds occupy 16 square miles and is home to over 50,000 residents. Longtime residents would say there is a close-knit community full of shared values and culture. This sense of community is fostered within Edina’s many neighborhoods, parks, schools, sporting venues, and its Community Center. Edina also has a drastically low crime rate, which is 20% lower than the Minnesota average, and 33% lower than the national average.1 This makes it an ideal, safe place to raise a family, in addition to its high performing public- school district. Businesses also aspire to call Edina home. With regards to commerce, Edina is home to more than 4,000 active and innovative businesses that are local, regional, and international in reach. Many of these are in shopping areas (e.g. 50th and France, the Galleria mall) and various office parks throughout the city (e.g. Centennial Lakes). Academic excellence is another highly valued aspect of Edina community life. The city is particularly known for its high-achieving public-school district, which prides the green and white school colors that are ubiquitous throughout the community. Edina Senior High School is perennially ranked as one of the top schools in the state of Minnesota, and it also receives high marks on a national basis.2 That same excellence is pursued on the athletic fields, as Edina holds great history and a tradition of success in many sports. Although several sports are both popular and competitive, perhaps the one most commonly associated with Edina is hockey. Both the girls’ and boys’ hockey programs hold several state championship trophies. Additionally, championships have been captured in a host of other sports, so much so that in 2000, Edina was recognized as the first school in Minnesota to have won 100 state high school championships. Today, that number stands at 170 championships.3 Demographics Although the Edina community includes people and families of all races, most residents are white (85%). Additionally, around 7% are Asian, 3.5% are Latino, 2% are more than one race and 2% are black. These figures stand in contrast to the city’s history – black families were among the first to settle in Edina. 1 Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2016 Uniform crime reports: Edina, MN., (2016). 2 US News Education, Edina Senior High School.,(2017). 3 Edina Public Schools, Athletic Department: State Championships., (2018). 8 However, over the course of the 20th and 21st centuries, white families grew to represent an increasing majority within the community.4 Wealth and prosperity are also defining characteristics of Edina. This manifests through the high median single-family home value of $455,500. Additionally, the median household income is around $88,000 and the city touts a high homeownership rate, with 73.4% of residents owning their home.5 Government Structure (Plan B City) To support those who live in, work within, and visit Edina, the city government is designed to provide governance and the necessary city-based services and assistance for the community. The city accomplishes this by incorporating leadership and decision-making authority through several governing bodies. These include the Mayor and City Council, and City Manager’s office, all of whom work to foster the city’s mission and vision. Edina City Government Mission: Our mission is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses Edina City Government Vision: Edina holds a well-earned reputation as a city of choice. It is the model of a successful, mature, and progressive urban community, that strives to lead in a modern and evolving world. We maintain our heritage and attractiveness, and afford our residents the highest quality of life, while actively embracing the future. City Council The City Council, which is accountable to the residents of Edina, holds legislative authority. It is comprised of an elected Mayor and four elected at-large Council (in staggered terms) who hold an equal vote in setting policies and ordinances for the city. Specific responsibilities of the Council include approving the budget, taxation, and management of city property. Additionally, the Council hires, fires, and supervises the City Manager, as well as holds them accountable to their responsibilities. The Council meets twice per month in the Council Chambers at City Hall, all of which are open to the public. 4 The City of Edina, A Rich History. A Bright Future., (2017). 5 Department of Administration, Minnesota State Demographic Center., (2017). 9 Mayor The Mayor of Edina has the same responsibilities and authority as other council members, but also holds the responsibility for running Council meetings and signing documents. Since 2005, Jim Hovland has served as Mayor of Edina. Mayor Hovland’s current term expires in January of 2021. Prior to his service as the Mayor, he was a City Council member from 1997-2005. In addition to serving as the Mayor, Hovland practices law at the Edina-based firm Hovland & Rasmus, PLLC where he is a partner. He is a resident of Edina and is white. City Manager The City Manager holds management and administrative authority within the city government, which includes carrying out all city operations as well as managing city staff, employees, and contractors. Within the city government, approximately 285 full- time and 300-700 part-time/seasonal employees support all city operations. These employees provide a vast array of services to those who work, live, and visit Edina. Various government-run facilities are located throughout Edina, including city hall, two fire stations, a senior center, an aquatic center, Edinborough Park, and Braemar golf course, just to name a few. Additionally, statutory duties of the City Manager include hiring and firing city employees, enforcing city ordinances, exercising control over city departments, attending and participating in city meetings without a vote, recommending measures necessary for the welfare of the city, reporting financial condition and needs of the city, and preparing the annual budget. Under the City Manager’s management are the various operating departments of the city government. These include: Community Development, Engineering, Fire, Parks and Recreation, Police, and Public Works. Additionally, there are four functional departments to support the city, including administration, finance, communications and technology services, and human resources. The current City Manager, Scott Neal, has held the position since 2010. He is not a resident of Edina and he is white. See Appendix A for additional detail on the government structure and department functions. Racial Issues In 1889, two black men help create the village of Edina. Active in all aspects of the community, whites and blacks appeared to live in harmony. Unfortunately, in the 1920’s, discriminatory housing policies limited the number of people of color moving into the city, including the original Country Club District. These policies, in addition to other exclusionary practices and cultural norms, made Edina known as a “sundown town”, where only white people were allowed after the sun went down.6 In the 1950’s the Morningside Neighborhood began allowing settlement for anyone who wished to buy property. This initially resulted in an increase of Jewish residents. In 1960, the first black family moved 6 The City of Edina, A Rich History. A Bright Future., (2017). 10 into the neighborhood and immediately faced a sublet complaint in attempts to keep them out. In response, 250 Morningside residents signed a “Fairness Petition” to support the black family.7 While Edina is seen a very prestigious city when it comes to work ethic, academics, and family orientation, remnants from this history remain. Many of the home deed covenants of Edina residents, which are a part of private property ownership and are outside of city jurisdiction, still include language that prohibits the sale of homes to people of color and Jewish individuals and families. Although these deed covenants may not be enforced due to provisions of Federal law, they continue to exist in formal homeownership documents of many current Edina residents. Several recent incidents have contributed to an escalated climate of racial tension within the community, some of which have attracted media attention. One such incident included a police stop when an off duty officer arrested a black man for walking in a heavily-trafficked Edina street while the sidewalk was under construction. The incident was captured on video by a passerby and subsequently went viral. The video generated a great deal of attention, both by residents of the Edina community as well those far beyond. This incident is described in more detail in the following section. More recently, Edina High School has been highlighted in the news due to accusations of racial identity policies, violence and a lawsuit related to disputes about the school’s authority over a student group. At a school-wide Veterans Day assembly, a handful of students of color chose not to stand during a school- wide gathering in appreciation of U.S. veterans. This upset other students, particularly within the Young Conservatives Club student organization, who made their frustrations known. Some perceived the opposition of the Young Conservatives Club as racially-motivated towards the students of color. After the Edina High School administration moved to shut down the student organization, this prompted the lawsuit against the school.8 This lawsuit went to Federal court and was ultimately voluntarily dismissed by the Plaintiffs.9 The school district released a statement on the settlement agreement on March 1st, 2018 emphasizing that, “the District strongly disagreed with all allegations that it had violated the rights of any student. However, in the spirit of cooperation with current students and to avoid the significant costs and expenses of continuing with the litigation, the District entered into the settlement agreement”.10 While there are signs that the community is growing more diverse, it is clear that Edina is still largely a white community, with more than 85% of its residents identifying as white/Caucasian. In contrast to some beliefs, Edina’s demographics are not a mere product of the city’s high cost of housing and living. Many people of color who live in or visit Edina note not feeling welcome in the community, which could be for many reasons, including race- based discrimination. A definition of race-based discrimination is 7 The City of Edina, A Rich History. A Bright Future., (2017). 8 Star Tribune, Five students, parents sue Edina High, district on free speech grounds., (2017). 9 Star Tribune, Edina school district settles free-speech lawsuit., (2018). 10 Edina Public Schools, District Statement on Settlement Agreement., (2018). Race: a grouping of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into categories generally viewed as inherently distinct by society. 11 treating someone unfavorably due to the color of their skin or a characteristic of their race.11 This could include skin color, hair, facial features, attitudes, or behaviors. Whether the feelings of not being welcome are due to race- based discrimination or not, the Edina city government has recognized the unwelcoming dynamic experienced by some community members, including people of color. A summary of these experiences and feelings are summarized below. Experiences Within City Government Facilities  Parks: Edina parks are places where community members have experienced racism primarily through racial slurs and race-based vandalism.  Other Facilities: There are observations and experiences of race-based harassment and race- based violence at various city facilities, such as Braemar arena and the Senior Center. Institutions  Lack of Representation/Decision Making: Many observe that there are few to no people of color that represent the city of Edina in government leadership, nor in government-appointed groups.  Hiring Practices and Procedures: There is uneasiness and suspicion around how race plays a role in government hiring practices.  Responsiveness to Race-Based Concerns: Many feel the city responds poorly to reports of race- based discrimination, or that the city does not respond at all. Services  Police Department: There is significant concern about police conduct with people of color.  City Housing Programs: Perceptions exist that city-based housing programs and policies are contributing to the lack of people of color in Edina.  Other Services: There is a perceived lack of inclusion in the process for how city services are designed and delivered. Outside City Government  Public Schools: There are various concerns about the Edina Public School system, including race- based discrimination, reverse racism, and frustrations with academics and administration.  Real Estate: There are perceptions that realtors are contributing to the lack of racial diversity within the community. 11 Barnshaw, John (2008). "Race". In Schaefer, Richard T. Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Society, Volume 1. SAGE Publications. pp. 1091–3. People of Color: a person who is not white or of European parentage. 12  Neighborhoods: Some people of color feel uneasy and insecure when walking around affluent neighborhoods at night in fear of being followed by the police.  Libraries: Some community members experience and observe race-based discrimination in public libraries within Edina.  Athletic Associations: Perceptions exist that athletic associations intentionally limit the involvement of community members of color. Race-based Discrimination Between Community Members  Cultural Insensitivity: There is an overall sense that Edina community members are insensitive to non-white cultures.  Racial Slurs: Throughout the community, people of all races are verbalizing racial slurs.  Micro-aggressions: Instances of indirect, subtle, or unintentional discrimination against community members of color are widespread across Edina.  Otherness: Many do not feel welcome or a sense of belonging based on the cultural norm that people who differ from the typical Edina profile do not belong in the community.  Weariness/Discomfort to Inter-Racial Families: Inter-racial families hear insensitive comments and receive questions about how their family members are related, which leaves them with a feeling of discomfort and that they do not belong.  Insensitivity to Experiences of Non-White People: White community members demonstrate little sympathy toward the experiences of their community members of color.  Neighbors: There are observations and experiences of race-based discrimination between neighbors. Summary of Community Reactions/Responses to Race-Based Discrimination Six recurring themes emerged in how the community reacts and responds to race-based discrimination. I. Does not do anything because they are not directly involved and/or feel it is not their place: Countless community members share this sentiment. II. Does not think anything can be done: There are several people from across the community that express a feeling that nothing can be done to resolve race-based discrimination. III. Does not know what to do/Wish they knew what to do: Many community members report feeling unsure of how to respond to instances of race-based discrimination, and some express interest in being educated on how to appropriately respond. IV. Wish they had done something: Community members often note reflecting upon an observed incident and wish they had confronted the situation or intervened. V. Engages on the topic of race within the community: Many people react to observing and/or hearing about race-based discrimination by becoming engaged on the topic of race within the Edina community. VI. Reports Incident: Many community members who experience and observe race-based discrimination report the situations to authorities. 13 Where Do Community Members Feel and Not Feel a Sense of Belonging in Edina? Community members voice a range of experiences and perspectives around which places and people within Edina foster a sense of belonging. Additionally, there’s a similar range of experiences in the places and people that do not engender a sense of belonging.  There is a significant disparity in how white community members and people of color perceive being welcome by people and at places within Edina.  Many white community members note feeling a sense of belonging everywhere.  Many community members of color feel a sense of belonging nowhere.  Regardless of race, country clubs and the Galleria are places where Edina community members note not feeling welcome nor a sense of belonging.  Within the city government, many mention an absence of belonging at the police station, located in city hall, and not feeling welcome in situations that involve Edina police officers.  Regardless of race, places of worship are places that Edina community members feel a sense of belonging and that they are welcome.  Many have experiences or observations of race-based discrimination at Jerry’s Foods and/or within Edina schools.  A great deal of tension within the community exists in how the school system is addressing race. October 14, 2016 Pedestrian-Police Incident On October 14, 2016, an incident involving an Edina police officer and a black pedestrian occurred. The pedestrian, Larnie Thomas, was walking along Xerxes Avenue at West 60th Street in the southbound lane of traffic due to the sidewalk being under construction. A quick web search leads to the police report of the incident (see Appendix B).12 The incident escalated and led to a confrontation and physical contact between Mr. Thomas and the officer when the officer grabbed his coat near his shoulder. Mr. Thomas, in an attempt to keep walking, shrugged off clothing to remove himself from the hold of the officer. A woman driving past the scene pulled over and began to record the event on her cell phone. To de-escalate the situation, she inserted herself by suggesting that the officer should show him where to walk. The situation further escalated when a second officer appeared on the scene, exited his vehicle, and told Mr. Thomas that his partner had said he was under arrest. Mr. Thomas and the second officer engaged in a verbal dispute about the nature of his arrest. Mr. Thomas was eventually arrested. He was cited for disorderly conduct and pedestrian failure to obey a traffic signal. The officer later released Mr. Thomas and dropped him off at a shopping mall. The video captured by the bystander subsequently went viral on the internet when she posted it on YouTube, creating outrage among many community members and individuals from near and far. 12 Legalectric, Incident/Investigation Report., (2016). Racial Equity: the condition that would be achieved if one's racial identity no longer predicted, in a statistical sense, how one fares. 14 Mayor Jim Hovland responded in regard to this case stating that the police officer followed proper protocol and noted that Mr. Thomas was not taken to jail. The citation issued to Mr. Thomas was later dismissed. This incident created unrest among some residents regarding racial equity within Edina.13 Soon after the incident, at a City Council meeting on October 18, 2016 approximately 150 community members and advocates voiced their feelings and perspectives on the incident. This meeting allowed individuals to question the City Council on the situation and the protocol that the officer had taken.14 Mayor Hovland opened the meeting explaining that the City Council was there to listen. He also confirmed his belief that proper protocol had been taken but that the protocol was wrong and ineffective. There were many concerns, questions, and sentiments of outrage expressed at the City Council Meeting. During the meeting Mayor Hovland asked the community of advocates, residents, and others to generate ideas, solutions, and changes to create positive changes within Edina.15 Race and Equity Task Force Establishment: The Edina community had experienced several incidents and events that suggested racial tensions and possible racial discrimination for some who live in, work within, or visit the city of Edina. This included, but was not limited to, the October 14, 2016incident described above. To better understand how such racial tensions and disparities impact the community and to subsequently ensure that Edina is a welcoming community for all people, the City Council voiced an interest in creating an initiative to “eliminate disparate impact of city policies and operations that is caused by race.” This was officially articulated in a staff report from City Manager Scott Neal at a City Council meeting on December 6, 2016. The creation of a resident-led Task Force to undertake this work and its structure were approved during that meeting and development of the initiative was subsequently initiated by the City Manager and his staff. Structure The structure of this initiative is multi-tiered. It was agreed to that the Task Force, formally named the Edina Race & Equity Task Force, is the ultimate decision-making group of this initiative and is composed of nine members, all Edina residents, who were appointed by the City Council after an open application process. The City Manager advised and assisted the City Council with the selection of Task Force members. Additionally, the Task Force is supported by three Working Groups focused on key areas of the city government: Facilities, Services and Institutions. The following includes the scope of each group: 13 W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Racial equity resource guide: glossary., (2009). 14 Star Tribune, At Edina City Council anger over police incident., (2016). 15 Star Tribune, At Edina City Council anger over police incident., (2016). 15  Facilities: prepare recommendations for ensuring racial equity in City facilities (physical spaces). These include, but are not limited to, parks and trails, City Hall, and recreation facilities such as Braemar.  Institutions: prepare recommendations for ensuring racial equity in representation in City government. These include, but are not limited to, elected official representation, advisory board and commission recommendation, employment practices, and communication protocol.  Services: prepare recommendations for ensuring racial equity in access of use City Services. Some examples include street and utility maintenance, parks maintenance, recreation programs, police, fire, ambulance, and community health. These Working Groups are accountable to the Task Force. Each Working Group is composed of:  One or two members of the Task Force  Five members appointed by the City Council  Two members that work for the city government and a City Staff Support, all of whom were appointed by the City Manager Apart from the City Manager’s appointments, all members of the Working Groups are Edina residents. To lead these various groups, two co-chair positions for the Task Force and chair and vice-chair roles for each Working Group were named by the Council. Support was provided by a professional Task Force facilitator that partnered with the Task Force and Working Groups to accomplish the identified set of objectives. Member Selection In December of 2016, the Council published an online posting to solicit applications from community members who hoped to contribute in the work of the Task Force, either by participating on the Task Force or one of the Working Groups. As noted above, the Council and City Manager informed the selection process, which was announced in February of 2017. Additionally, the City Manager made his city staff appointments in that month as well. 16 The following includes those selected to participate in each group: Facilitator Selection In March of 2017, the city released a request for proposals (RFP) from firms or teams interested in facilitating the initiative (see Appendix C). The RFP was distributed through various channels – it was posted on the city’s public notice webpage, it was included in a press release, and it was directly sent to ten organizations that contacted the city. The city received four proposals from the following organizations: Citizens League, Ethical Leaders in Action, GrayHall, and YWCA of Minneapolis. The Task Force and City Manager reviewed and scored the proposals using scoring criteria developed as a team. Subsequently, three of the four organizations were selected to interview for the role: Citizens League, Ethical Leaders in Action, and GrayHall. All interviews took place on April 24, 2017. Following interviews, the Task Force and City Manager deliberated and decided to recommend Citizens League as the project facilitator team. The Citizens League facilitator team included named partners: Joi Unlimited and Turnlane in the proposal (see Appendix D). The facilitation team met with the Task Force for the first time in May 2017 to articulate the work plan. 17 Purpose and Objectives The purpose of the Task Force was to make recommendations on policies, practices, and strategies for the city of Edina to identify and eliminate race-based disparities in Edina city government facilities, services and institutions. The objective of this initiative is to determine what changes could be made to ensure that Edina is a welcoming community for all people. The primary Task Force responsibilities include assigning charges to and overseeing the development of the Working Groups, reviewing analysis and recommendations from Working Groups, and developing overall recommendations to the City Council. Much of the work development occurs at the Working Group level. Each Working Group is responsible for researching, evaluating, and preparing recommendations for ensuring racial equity in their given area of the city department. For example, the Services Working Group focuses on city-delivered services within Edina, such as street & utility maintenance, parks maintenance, recreation programs, police, fire, ambulance, and community health. The Facilities Working Group focuses on facilities (physical spaces), including parks & trails, City Hall, recreation facilities, and other public buildings, while the Institutions Working Group focuses on things such as elected official representation, advisory board and commission representation, employment practices, and communication protocol. Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE) It is important to note that the city of Edina has taken other steps to address race-based discrimination. Prior to the city initiating the Race & Equity Task Force, Edina joined the Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE), which is a national network of governments working to achieve racial equity and advance opportunities for all. GARE brings together jurisdictions across the county seeking to lead racial equity, collaborate across municipalities, and form local and regional coalitions. This work includes leveraging a racial equity framework that identifies individual, institutional, and structural racism. Additionally, GARE provides equity tools for city governments to utilize in redesigning more equitable approaches to governing. The GARE Racial Equity Took Kit can be found in Appendix E. Although the work of GARE is related to the work of the Race & Equity Task Force, it is a separate body of work with a different scope. There are, however, a number of individuals that serve on Edina’s GARE team who also serve on either the Race & Equity Task Force or one of the Working Groups. 18 The Approach From the outset of this initiative, the Citizens League facilitation team informed the city of Edina and the Race and Equity Task Force that holding uncomfortable conversations about racial discrimination and inequities were necessary to identify race-based disparities and create solutions to the city government policies and operating practices. These were two goals stated in the city of Edina’s Request for Proposal. The Orange Method Holding these conversations required creating spaces that emphasize belonging and shared humanity. In selecting the Citizens League team for this ten-month process, the Race and Equity Task Force agreed to use the Orange Method, a process developed by Dr. Joi Lewis, Founder and CEO of Joi Unlimited, www.joiunlimited.com, as a way to convene community members with the framework of using their multiple and intersecting identities and gather input from all people and perspectives. The Orange Method is an iterative model of community engagement. It helps individuals and institutions to transform against the backdrop of oppression-induced trauma. This is done by creating boundaries at work, committing to self and community, and developing better access to the healthy expression of grief and pain.  Utilizing the Orange Method, team member Dr. Joi Lewis led facilitated community conversations/gatherings with the objective to:  Create safe space + self-reflection + establish common ground = provide opportunities to increase trust, Increase sense of belonging through re-connecting with self and others. This method was used throughout the entirety of the ten-month process, which included the facilitating meetings and conversations with the Task Force, Working Groups, and city staff. Additionally, it was used during the large community convenings, as well as the small group community conversations. More information on The Orange Method can be found in Appendix F. Dr. Joi Lewis facilitates a Task Force meeting using the Orange Method. 19 Research Methodologies To understand the scope of race-based discrimination and feelings of being unwelcome in the Edina community, data was collected from a range of Edina community members during the summer, fall, and winter months of 2017. The data was gathered from many community members through a number of mechanisms, including interviews, group conversations, and an anonymous online survey. All information in this report maintains confidentiality of those who shared their perspectives and experiences. Additionally, the task force, working groups, and community meetings were also critical in creating a variety of entry points for people to share their insights about race based discrimination in the City of Edina. Across all mechanisms of data collection, four questions were consistently asked in an attempt to acquire information about race-based discrimination occurring within the city of Edina. We were interested in learning about the Faces (people), Places (specific locations) and Spaces (climate and culture) where people did or did not feel a sense of belonging. The four guiding questions are as follows:  Question 1: Have you experienced, observed, and/or heard race-based discrimination in Edina’s city government, specifically within facilities, services, and institutions?  Question 2: If you have experienced, observed, and/or heard race-based discrimination, what did you do or wished that you had done to respond to the incident/situation?  Question 3: What are spaces, places, and faces within the city of Edina that you feel a sense of belonging and that you matter?  Question 4: What are spaces, places, and faces within the city of Edina that you do not feel a sense of belonging and that you are not welcomed? Timeline of Community Input & Data 20 The results in this report are intended to represent survey responses of community members, not formal research. With this community input, we sought to understand what people’s experiences are and what they say they know. Since these are responses and not formal research, responses are presented as-is, and may not reflect actual Edina city policy and/or practices. One-On-One Interviews One-on-one interviews were conducted by two members of the Citizens League team: Pahoua Yang Hoffman and Alex Clark. This included the city of Edina Executive Leadership Team members, eight Task Force members, nine-teen Working Group members, and Edina’s Human Rights and Relations Commission. Interviews took place in the initial stages of the initiative and were conducted in a number of community venues, as well as over the phone. Large Group Community Gatherings Two large-group community convenings took place on October 23, 2017 and December 4, 2017 at Southview Middle School. These gatherings were advertised to the community through the city’s various communications channels including a press release, social media, paper invitations that were handed out, and listings on city website and calendar as well as word of mouth through the members of the Task Force and Working Groups. The convenings were facilitated by Dr. Joi Lewis from the Citizens League team using the Orange Method. Those attending were deeply engaged in a process that allowed them to use themselves as instruments to examine the difficult notions of race and belonging. Attendees participated in a number of dyad and small group conversations on the topics of community life and race-based discrimination in Edina. The participants recorded their own answers to the four guiding questions in small-groups, which were subsequently collected by the facilitators for inclusion in the broader community data. The process, although unconventional, yielded opportunities for participants to connect with others they may never have before. Many connections across differences were made. Small Group Community Gatherings In addition to the large community gatherings, three small community gatherings took place within community spaces or homes during the fall of 2017. These conversations were attended by 5-15 community members and were facilitated by various Task Force and Working Group members. Those A Large Group Community Gathering discussing community life and race-based discrimination in Edina. 21 attending had been invited by those who were facilitating. During these conversations, attendees were asked the same four questions that were consistently asked throughout the process. Online Survey An anonymous online survey was available to the public from October to December 2017. This survey was created by the Citizens League and developed using the Survey Monkey online tool. The city of Edina posted it on the Race and Equity Task Force web site and was advertised to the community through the city’s various communications channels. There were a total of 219 Edina community members whom completed the survey. The same four questions asked of other community members were utilized within the survey. An additional three questions were including in the survey to gather optional demographic information and other comments for the Task Force to consider. The survey largely relied on open-ended text boxes (see below for example) for all questions except for question 6. Due to this survey design with open-ended text boxes, the amount of information shared varied by individual and by question. The questions and number of respondents for each are exhibited below.  Q1 Please describe your experiences, observations, and/or reports of race-based discrimination that have occurred in Edina including interactions with city government employees, within the city’s facilities, services, and organization (such as communication practices, boards and commissions or elected officials). Answered: 219 Skipped: 0  Q2 If you shared an example in the previous question, what did you do or wished that you had done to respond to the incident/situation? Answered: 162 Skipped: 57  Q3 Describe which spaces, places, and faces (people) within Edina that give you a sense of belonging and gives you a feeling that you matter. Answered: 219 Skipped: 0  Q4 Are there spaces, places, and faces (people) within Edina that make you feel that you do not belong or that you are not welcomed? If yes, please describe the where in the city that occurs and/or the faces. Please include why you feel that way. Answered: 219 Skipped: 0  Q5 Is there anything else you would like us to know? Answered: 185 Skipped: 34 22  Q6 Do you live and/or work in the City of Edina? Answered: 219 Skipped: 0  Q7 OPTIONAL - Demographics (tell us your gender, race & ethnicity, etc. that you wish us to know) Answered: 139 Skipped: 80 Summary Findings Overview of Community Data Collection Through various interviews, gatherings, and survey responses, experiences and observations of race- based discrimination within the city of Edina were shared and subsequently distilled into themes. These themes are intended to provide insight into the policies and procedures within Edina’s city government that could be altered or created as a means to create equitable change. Demographic Information Collected Throughout the data collection process, demographic information was obtained using a variety of approaches depending on the mechanism of data collection. The following includes the demographic information obtained during collection. Additionally, a table below summarizes all demographics. Race and Equity Task Force The Race and Equity Task Force consists of eight individuals who were selected by the City Council or City Manager. Five of the members are people of color while three of are white. All Task Force members live in Edina, and it is unknown if any of them also work in Edina. The Task Force data summary can be found in Appendix G. Race and Equity Working Groups Nineteen of the 21 total members that make up the three Working Groups, of which 13 are white and six are people of color. Women make up 12 of the 19, and seven are men. Thirteen live in Edina and six work in Edina. The Working Group data summary can be found in Appendix H. City Executive Leadership The City Executive Leadership Team is comprised of 11 individuals leading departments or management functions within the Edina city government. All team members report to the City Manager and Assistant City Manager. All of the individuals are white and all reside outside Edina. Four of them identify as female and seven as male. Additionally, one key support staff was interviewed who identifies as a white female. The Executive Leadership Team data summary can be found in Appendix I. 23 Large Group Community Gatherings There were two large group community gatherings both consisting of 30-50 participants. Although demographic data was not formally recorded, it is estimated from community member-introductions and facilitator observations, that 80% were white and 20% people of color. 60% were female and 40% were male, 80% only live in Edina, only 1% work in Edina, and 19% both live and work in Edina. The Large Group Community Gathering data summary can be found in the Edina Community Data in Appendix J. Small Group Community Gatherings Three small-group community gatherings were led by various Working Group and Task Force members between the months of October and November of 2017. These gatherings were comprised of 25 total community members. 64% of the participants were people of color while 36% were white. Women made up 72% of the voices and men 28%. There were 80% Edina residents present, and 20% work in Edina. The Small Group Community Gathering summary data can be found in the Edina Community Data in Appendix J. Online Survey Collection Demographic information on the online survey was optional. Only about half of the total 219 participants provided this information. From that information it’s gathered that 85% are white, 15% are people of color. 69% are female, and 39% male. 66% of them only live in Edina, 3% only work in Edina, and 30% both live and work in Edina. The online survey data summary can be found in the Edina Community Data in Appendix J, while a link to the survey results can be found in Appendix K. 24 Community Findings Experiences, Observations, and Awareness of Race-Based Discrimination Across all interviews, group gatherings, and online survey responses, 20 themes consistently emerged surrounding experiences, observations, and awareness of race-based discrimination. Facilities I. Parks Edina parks are places where community members have experienced racism primarily through racial slurs and race-based vandalism. Input from community:  A Working Group member mentioned an incident at Edinborough Park where an employee asked a family of color to move so a white family could have access to the space. The family of color perceived the action of the staff member to be racially motivated.  While at an Edina playground, a Working Group member heard a child remark that they didn’t want to play with brown kids.  A person of color known to a Task Force member was at a park with a child. When returning to their car, etched in dust on the vehicle was, “F- all you monkeys.” II. Other Facilities There are observations and experiences of race-based harassment and race-based violence at various city facilities, such as Braemar Arena and the Senior Center. Input from community:  A community member shared a story of race-based violence via the online survey: “I was invited to skate in the high school's hockey captain’s practices at Braemar Arena. In the locker room after the first practice, some senior guys started calling a younger, black player racial slurs and eventually started punching him and choking him while calling him the n-word.”  When a Working Group member’s spouse was dropping off their parent, who is a person of color, at the Senior Center for a community activity, an employee of the Center asked them, “Where are you busing this woman from?” and also remarked, “This isn’t a place to dump people (in the lobby)”, while many white people sat all around in the lobby during this incident.  A survey respondent shared, “My African-American family went to open ice skating at Braemar Arena. A young Caucasian male was practicing hockey on the ice shooting a puck at high speeds near us. The Braemar staff made him stop because it was dangerous. He made several racial statements to my family and scraped ice by stopping that sprayed on my son when he fell - he did this twice. We were the only people on the ice. We skated a little while longer, I talked to the young man’s parents then we left.” 25 City’s current practice/policy on this issue: The city does not currently require organizations or individuals using city facilities to uphold a code of conduct. There are no visible signs around facility conduct at city facilities. Institutions III. Lack of Representation/Decision Making Many observe that there are few to no people of color that represent the city of Edina in government leadership, nor in government-appointed groups. In particular, they noted the city Council and the city’s Executive Leadership Team. Additionally, a lack of diversity is also noticed in citizen participation of city-appointed groups, such as boards, task forces, and commissions. Input from Community:  A Working Group member shared that they feel it’s clear that there is racism in the selection of city-appointed boards, commissions, and task forces, which result in a lack of representation from people of color. As an example, the liquor store Task Force was comprised of all white people.  One Task Force member shared their feeling that there’s a common practice of “color blindness” where decisions are made thinking race isn’t a factor in decision-making processes when it absolutely is.  During one of the large group community gatherings, many people mentioned that having an all-white City Council does not represent the diversity and the lived experiences of others who live in Edina.  One responded from the online survey shared, “My experience within Edina suggest that the systems, policies and practices are geared toward white families and serve me well. Our government/governing bodies are white and therefore may not have the insight to more actively explore how to dismantle some of those policies UNLESS there is an active, intentional willingness to do so.”  An online survey response stated, “structural inequality exists because government and economic power in the city is controlled by one race and (largely) one economic class (upper income).” City’s current practice/policy on this issue: When appointing positions to city groups, the city does not require demographic information. The City recently conducted a survey on demographics for city-appointed boards and commissions which resulted in similar demographics of the city (see Appendix L). IV. Hiring Practices and Procedures There is uneasiness and suspicion around how race plays a role in government hiring practices. There are varying opinions of the city’s use, or lack of use, of affirmative action practices. 26 Input from community and Executive Leadership Team:  An Executive Leadership Team member pointed out that during the hiring process for a City Hall position, the search committee advised against hiring a candidate, as they did not think the person was a good fit because they had an accent.  An Executive Leadership Team member and a Working Group member mentioned that a complaint was received from a resident about the choice of a city vendor who was Latino. The resident inquired why the city did not hire someone who represents the community.  A finalist for a city government position who met the required qualifications was noted by a selection committee member (a member of city staff) as not having good enough eye contact. An Executive Leadership Team member thought this was due cultural differences in eye contact and tried to explain it to the hiring committee  An online survey participant noted, “I notice that the people of color I see working at the Edina schools are usually janitors, traffic directors, etc., rather than teachers.”  An online survey respondent shared, “Edina does not need to change ‘faces’ in order for people to feel welcome. This leads to hiring unqualified people in order to show good statistics.” City’s current practice/policy on this issue: The city government files equal employment opportunity reports (EE0-4) on the representation of its staff on odd numbered years, but does not publish this information. V. Responsiveness to Race-Based Concerns Many feel the city responds poorly to reports of race-based discrimination, or that the city does not respond at all. Input from community:  A Task Force member mentioned that when race-based incidents are brought to city staff, it seems as though they’re not sure how to respond, if at all.  A Task Force member pointed out that the delayed response from the Mayor and city officials after the Larnie Thomas incident made people question the integrity of the city government and the unwavering endorsement of police actions.  An Executive Leadership Team member noted that the efforts from the city government around race and equity seem disingenuous, like a check the box type of feel.  When a race-based incident was reported to police by a Task Force member, a police officer responded, “That’s the worst you’ve gotten?” City’s current practice/policy on this issue: The city currently has a five-step protocol for responding to reports of bias offense like race-based discrimination.16 However, the city does not currently categorize reports of race-based discrimination, nor does the city track the volume of reports. 16 The City of Edina, Bias Offense Response Plan., (1997). 27 Services VI. Police Department There is significant concern about police conduct with people of color. Various individuals shared experiences of racial profiling or perceiving there to be a disproportionate number of police situations that involved people of color. Most of the instances were traffic stops, but also includes instances of police following people of color within Edina. Additionally, police suspicion is perceived to be racially motivated in situations where people of color are in high-income neighborhoods and when people of color are in possession of expensive goods. Input from Community:  One community member noted in the online survey, “One of my biggest observations is how many people of color are pulled over by police officers in the city. In a two week period of time, I saw five African-American people pulled over and in that same period of time I saw no white people pulled over.”  After noticing people of color frequently being pulled over, a Working Group member began slowing down to take a tally of cars being pulled over and estimated about 90% of stops involved a person of color.  One community member mentioned in the online survey, “As a female minority, I notice that police cars follow me when driving. In fact one followed right behind me (about 1 foot from the bumper of my car - which I assume he was trying to be intimidating and to see if I would pull over). I was not speeding, so I kept driving until I got home to and opened my garage door (which is when he quickly sped by me and left). I live in a neighborhood where our houses sell for up to $3M, so I'm pretty sure he thought I must be a criminal since I was a minority in a nice neighborhood. This has happened more than once.”  A Task Force member gave an example of cars being parked on the street in the winter. The car belonging to the person of color was ticketed while white individual got a warning.  After a Task Force member purchased expensive bikes for their nephews who are black, their nephews were pulled over by police who ran their bike tags to see if they were stolen, handcuffed them and brought them to the Task Force member’s home in the back of a squad car. After the Task Force member produced bike receipts and packaging, the officer apologized. Asked why they were handcuffed and whether their nephews had committed a crime, the officer said it was their policy to handcuff individuals in a squad car.  A number of community members shared their experiences with police officers who used condescending approaches and micro-aggressions towards people of color. 28 City’s current practice/policy on this issue: The Edina police department has the capability to collect demographic data for arrests and citations. However, the consistency and processes of collection are not uniform. The police department and the Race & Equity Services Working Group recognize the challenges in determining best practices for this type of data collection, analysis, and impact. There are 53 Edina police officers on the police force, two of which identify as people of color, and specifically African American. 17 VII. City Housing Programs Perceptions exist that city-based housing programs and policies are contributing to the lack of people of color in Edina. Input from community:  A Working Group member noted believing that CommonBond low-income Edina housing projects are not allowed to be developed in the Edina school district.  A Working Group member pointed out that developers can buy their way out of Section 8 housing requirements, which limits the number of low income residents.  A Working Group member felt that some housing programs aim to keep people already from Edina to remain in Edina (e.g. Come Home to Edina program) instead of creating pathways for people new to the city to buy home in Edina. VIII. Other Services There is a perceived lack of inclusion in the process for how city services are designed and delivered. Input from community:  A Working Group member of color shared that an arborist showed up to their home to take down a tree. When the Working Group member called the city about this, a city employee said they had received an anonymous tip from a neighbor about a sick tree. The arborist now comes back every year to monitor their property.  From the online survey, one community member said, “We had troubles with one city inspector during our house renovation process. My husband felt like the inspector was "extra" hard on our house because we are an interracial couple.”  A white school district staff member asked the child (who is black) of a Working Group member if they received free/reduced lunch. The white school district staff member seemed to assume that because the child was black, they were in the A Better Chance program, lived in Minneapolis, and were in need of assistance (in the form of tickets to an event) from the program.  The large group community gathering collected thoughts that the lack of public transit contributes to a lack of diversity and inclusion in Edina. 17 The City of Edina, Edina Police Department., (2018). Section 8 Housing: authorizes the payment of rental housing assistance to private landlords on behalf of low-income households (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities). 29  A Working Group member has had issues with city codes for things like visible trash cans when other neighbors have visible trash cans. They described it as a form of racial harassment.  A city employee shared that there have been race-based graffiti offenses which have included offensive language. The cost common locations where this has occurred include 50th and France, parking garages, parks, well houses. City’s current practice/policy on this issue: The city currently has a five-step protocol for responding to reports of race-based vandalism. 18 Additional Findings In addition to the community findings listed above, findings that go beyond the scope of the city government were also captured and synthesized. Many themes revolve around the public-school district, athletic associations, micro-aggressions, otherness, and cultural insensitivity. These findings can be found in Appendix M. Summary of Community Reactions/Responses to Race-Based Discrimination In addition to soliciting input on instances of race-based discrimination, community members were also asked about their reactions and responses to such instances. The following includes six recurring themes that emerged from the community’s reactions and responses. I. Does not do anything because they are not directly involved and/or feel it is not their place Countless community members share this sentiment. Often, there is a feeling that it is not one’s place to respond since they are not directly involved in a situation, or they believe that there are already authorities and policies in place that would address the situation. Input from community (from the online survey):  “I don't have to do anything about it. Others are.”  “There’s nothing I could have done, since I did not witness it myself.”  “It didn’t happen to me.”  “I have not been in a position to personally respond to any incident.”  “I wasn’t able to do anything and I believe everything was ironed out.”  “I was alone and in no position to handle it.” 18 The City of Edina, Bias Offense Response Plan., (1997). 30 II. Does not think anything can be done There are several people from across the community that express a feeling that nothing can be done to resolve race-based discrimination. Some of this stems from the sense that racism is part of our society and cannot be eliminated. Input from community:  An online survey respondent’s reaction to observed social media racism was, “Unfortunately social media is a necessary part of our culture.”  A Task Force member “felt as though there’s nothing that could be done.”  One community shared in the survey, “Stop trying to fix humanity.”  A respondent to the survey shared, “Any discrimination I've seen is more normal, at best. Edina is wasting it's time and resources trying to fix something that isn't broken!”  The following was mentioned in a survey response: “It's not an issue in Edina, there are so many activities and groups people can belong to. If there are issues in some cases, it stems from one's family or one's own behavior. That's terribly sad, but it's still not an issue that the local government, school administrators, teachers, etc. can really fix. It seems the more people in those positions try to 'fix' things that are really the job of families and parents, the worst that topic tends to get.” III. Does not know what to do/Wishes they knew what to do Many community members report feeling unsure of how to respond to instances of race-based discrimination, and some express interest in learning how to appropriately respond. Input from community:  An online survey participant shared their reaction to observed race-based violence, “Being both new and young, I sat in the locker room in shock. I did not know what to do.”  A community member from the large community gathering stated that they wished they knew how to respond to racist cyber comments.  A community member from a small group gathering expressed that they didn’t know what to say or if it was ok to say something.  It was shared in a small group community gathering that someone didn’t know what to do but wants to learn how to respond. IV. Wish they had done something Community members often note reflecting upon an experienced or observed incident and wishing they had confronted the situation or intervened. This includes wishing they had directly intervened or contacted an authority. Input from community:  A Task Force member mentioned not having the courage to confront individuals who made discriminatory statements but wishing they had.  A community member shared in the online survey, “I probably wish I would have been able to contact someone within the city to relay the incident, but frankly I felt that 31 nothing would happen even if I did, and I might be labeled a "troublemaker" rather than a good citizen.”  A survey respondent shared, “I wish I would have told the (Braemar) staff. We paid our money and are residents of Edina – we have just as much right to use the facility as they do.”  A large group community gathering participant shared that they wished they had stood up for themselves in a race-based incident. V. Engages on the topic of race within the community Many people react to observing and/or hearing about race-based discrimination by becoming engaged on the topic of race within the Edina community. This includes talking to their families and friends, educating themselves, and getting involved in the community’s efforts to disrupt racism. Input from community:  A Task Force member shared that they joined committees and groups to try to make policy and conduct changes and bring broader awareness to the issue of race.  Another Task Force member noted that they showed up and participated in the hearing in October after the Larnie Thomas incident as a sign to demonstrate that Edina can do better.  A Working Group member took an inclusion training program at the University of Minnesota and now feels more equipped to acknowledge and respond when observing race-based discrimination.  A participant in the large community gathering shared that they asked questions to understand the motivations of those who expressed race-based discrimination. VI. Reports Incident Many community members who experience and observe race-based discrimination report the situations to authorities. The situational circumstances dictate who the appropriate authority is to contact but some examples provided by community members include the police, city staff, and authorities within the school system. Input from community:  A Task Force member reported an instance of race-based discrimination to the Human Rights and Relations Commission.  A small group gathering participant spoke to a teacher and the administration.  An Executive Leadership Team member mentioned trying to address hiring practices with the city’s human resources department.  An online survey respondent shared, “I wrote a letter to the Mayor.”  A Task Force member went to the police department with their friend whose car had been vandalized with hateful language.  Many community members from the large group community gatherings noted that they went to or contacted the police department. 32 Where Do Community Members Feel and Not Feel a Sense of Belonging in Edina? Community members voice a range of experiences and perspectives around which places and people within Edina foster a sense of belonging. Additionally, there’s a similar range of experiences in the places and people that do not engender a sense of belonging. There is a significant disparity in how white community members and community members of color perceive being welcome by people and places within Edina. Specifically, in some cases, places where white community members feel like they belong are the very places where community members of color either do not feel a sense of belonging or have experienced race-based discrimination. White community members don’t feel a sense of belonging White community members feel a sense of belonging People of color don’t feel a sense of belonging People of color feel a sense of belonging Southdale Jerry’s Jerry’s Southdale 50th and France 50th and France YMCA Everywhere No Where Country Clubs Places of Worship Country Clubs Places of worship Galleria Galleria Schools Schools Input from community:  A community member shared in the survey, “Jerry's is a great community spot to meet. There are students and community members always there meeting to talk or study and it's a diverse group of people.”  One community member recounted in the survey a particular experience: “I experienced racism at Jerry's by a customer. It was terrifying. She came barreling at us physically, screaming at our 3-year-olds while they held our hands. The customer made comments about this being Trump's time now, "goojs" not welcome, etc. Jerry's did nothing, even though we felt unsafe.”  A member of the City Executive Leadership Team stated: "I feel comfortable in all places but I'm a white male. I wouldn’t feel comfortable anywhere in the city if I were a person of color."  A survey respondent shared, “When going to a grocery store like Jerry's at Vernon Avenue, you can see how people stare at you when you are not speaking English. That grocery store has a customer base that is predominantly the "old Edina" residents.”  A Task Force member shared the following: "I feel a sense of belonging because I fit the mainstream profile for the Edina woman - white, homeowner, drive a car, shop at Galleria."  A survey respondent shared, “As I am white, I feel I belong everywhere. I'm not so sure about people of color.”  A community member mentioned in the survey, “There are no places in Edina that make me feel as if I do not belong.” I. When asked which places and people within Edina do not create a sense of belonging, many community members of color responded everywhere. 33 Input from community:  An online survey respondent shared, “Everywhere in Edina (makes me feel unwelcome).”  In both of the two large community gatherings, several community members shared not feeling a sense of belonging anywhere in Edina.  A Task Force member of color answered that there are no places in Edina where they feel welcome or that they belong. II. Regardless of race, Edina community members note not feeling welcome or a sense of belonging at more affluent places such as Country Clubs and the Galleria or in specific neighborhoods. Input from community:  An online survey participant mentioned that they, “Often don’t feel comfortable around the extreme wealth that exists within the city.”  An Executive Leadership Team member said, “If there were any places that make me feel unwelcome, it would be the country club neighborhoods like Rolling Green, Hilldale.”  Another survey response shared, “the country clubs in town have never felt welcoming”  Multiple small group gatherings noted that they do not feel like they belong at the Galleria.  One community member noted in the survey, “I don't feel like I belong in the fanciest subdivisions of the city, particularly around the country club, and in the warren of streets between 44th and 50th. The confusing street layouts seem to communicate "you're an outsider", and "you don't belong here". Also, when giant homes go up it makes me feel like the community is too wealthy, and I won't fit in.” III. Within the city government, many mention an absence of belonging at the police station or at other city facilities. Additionally, some community members do not feel a sense of belonging in situations that involve Edina police officers. Input from community:  An online survey participant shared a place they do not feel welcome as, “City Hall: when we go in with a question, we get looked at as if we are speaking in French!! Police: when you call to report unsafe road conditions, especially when Edina High School had construction and 169 construction and back up on ramp for Gleason, they would simply say that they can’t respond till an accident occurs. This is very disappointing to a concerned Edina citizen who is making an attempt to prevent something bad from happening!! I wish the city officials and phone responders get some training on how to respond better.”  A Task Force member shared that they no longer feel welcomed in the Galleria shopping center after a white policeman observed them. 34  In both large community gatherings, and one of the small group gatherings, the police station was brought up as a place where community members do not feel welcome.  One community member shared in the survey, “Police officers (make me feel unwelcome).”  A community member shared in the online survey that, “I don't find Edina to be an especially welcoming community. There are pockets of residents who are open and welcoming but the dominant culture in Edina is not and I think City Hall reflects the dominant culture rather than the open, welcoming and more progressive spirit of many of its residents.” IV. Regardless of race, Edina community members feel a sense of belonging and that they are welcome in places of worship. From the online survey, churches and places of worship were the second most noted places that make community members feel welcome. Input from community:  A respondent to the survey noted, “My church community (makes me feel welcome), because they see me as a multi-faceted contributing member, not just a face.”  Many survey respondents and a Working Group member shared they feel welcome at Our Lady of Grace church and school.  Survey respondents mentioned other places of worship including: “Good Samaritan Church, Christ Presbyterian Church”, “Edina Morningside Community Church”, “Edina Community Lutheran Church”  Church was brought up as a place of feeling welcome and belonging in a large community gathering and a small-group community gathering. V. Many white community members note not feeling welcome or comfortable at Southdale, especially at night. Input from community (from the online survey):  “Yes, I am uncomfortable and on edge at Southdale Mall area, particularly the parking lot as there are many unattached men present in that space. My past experience has been that young unattached men can cause trouble for women or someone traveling alone. I don’t shop at Southdale anymore other than Macy’s because of how I feel unsafe in the Mall.”  “Sometimes at Southdale gangs of thugs are intimidating and scary.”  “Southdale can feel unsafe at times. Every mall has predators so it is good to see security available... and when they are not present then it can feel ominous at times if they are larger groups of older youth without any adult supervision.”  “Southdale mall feels unsafe to me at night. Many gangs of young adult wander around and are intimidating.”  “Dave and Busters after dark and all of Southdale is slowly becoming as well. Too many unsupervised teens. Disrespectful teens are causing many issues in the schools and public spaces.” 35 VI. A great deal of tension within the community exists in how the school system is addressing race. Input from community (from the online survey):  “I don’t feel that all are equally welcome and respected at the schools based on recent events and the response of the administration.”  “At Edina Public School, staff meeting is where I’d feel least welcome.”  “Edina Schools are making my kids feel guilty for being white” 36 City Government Findings and Recommendations The recommendations section was written by the Task Force and Working Groups. The Citizens League team was absent from the development of this section. The full recommendations can be located in the Appendix. Recommendations Summary The Task Force compiled a summary of the recommendations which allowed them to fold similar recommendations amongst the working groups together. The recommendation unique identifier(s) are listed next to the recommendations. The summary lists twenty-one recommendations, however, each recommendation has several tasks under the overarching big picture recommendation. Recommendations Key  TF = Task Force  I = Institutions  F = Facilities  S = Services Twenty-One Recommendations 1. Race Equity Accountability Measures (TF-1)  Hire or identify a Race Equity manager/director, whose accountabilities include oversight of the Racial Equity Implementation Plan, monitoring, assessing and evaluating progress toward goals. This person should be part of the City’s Leadership Team.  Provide an annual report to Council and the public on progress toward established racial equity goals. More frequent reporting can be provided to Boards and Commissions on elements of the plan within their scope of work.  Include implementation of race equity implementation plan as a formal annual performance goal for all City Executive Leadership. 2. Attribution for historically significant contribution of Yancey Family to Edina’s history (TF-2)  Name a public facility in the Grandview area, if not Edina City Hall, after BC and Ellen Yancey. Race and Equity Lens: when those most impacted by structural racial inequity are meaningfully involved in the creation and implementation of the institutional policies and practices that impact their lives (source). 37 3. Complaint Response (I-3)  Develop City-wide procedure and policy for responding to complaints that are perceived by staff as possibly racially motivated. Provide direction and support for all City staff when navigating this type of complaint. Collect data on complaints that seem discriminatory in nature, including who makes the complaints and about whom. Apply this policy also to complaints against those belonging to other protected groups. 4. Staff Diversity and Training – City Departments (I-4, F-3)  Increase the number of people of color, and people with Multi Language skills within City Departments to more closely reflect the demographics of Hennepin County, including leadership and staff. City goals should reflect the demographics of Hennepin County, as they interact with residents from surrounding communities as well as Edina residents. For example: A. Participate in the POC (People of Color) Job Fairs. B. Set measurable goals and develop specific action plans for increase staff of color and staff that speak multiple languages (based on LEP policy) to account for shifting City demographics. C. Publicly report on the progress of these goals on an annual basis. D. Assess and revise job descriptions, prioritizing public-facing jobs (e.g., facilities workforce, police department), to include racial equity competencies. E. Review and adopt inclusive hiring practices to include more racially and culturally diverse outreach, inclusive application questions, recruitment, selection and interview processes. F. Explore programs like Pathway to Policing and Youth Development Programs to help create opportunities for diverse candidates, and add one FTE for police department to participate in Pathways to Policing Program as soon as possible. G. Offer additional incentives to diversify recruitment (e.g. offer admission to Edina schools for children). H. Promote Exchange Programs for police and fire professionals to spend time in Edina. I. Create pipeline of potential candidates by engaging children of color within the school system to highlight career pathways within City government. J. Identify specific opportunities to increase racial and cultural diversity on work teams. For example, identify ways to include racially and culturally diverse perspectives for action planning and implementation of these guidelines. 5. Community Engagement Policy Plan and Staffing (I-5)  Develop a policy and procedures that includes the city’s philosophy about the purpose and value of the city’s efforts in community engagement. Create an intentional community engagement plan that outlines the city’s community engagement approach and task a city employee with overseeing /directing community engagement work either by revising a current employee’s job duties or creating a new position, i.e., a plan/person to: 38 A. Oversee building relationships with all residents, paying particular attention to understand experience of communities of color, with time designated to visit neighborhood events, establish relationships with religious leaders, and neighborhood and ethnic associations; B. Coordinate volunteer opportunities and public participation when there are decisions for which the city is seeking public feedback and other types of public involvement, such as Boards, Commissions, Task Forces and other appointed positions to ensure that residents of color are included and heard  Revise the Human Services RFP to include a deliverable around funding community-based organizations lead by communities of color to assist the city with engagement. 6. Records Management (S-1)  Review Record Management - Data Practices Policy (Data Request) and rewrite this using Obama’s Plain Language Initiative Hemingway Application.  Have the city review all policies for plain language; all new policies should go through a plain language review 7. Budget (I-8)  Using best available data, disaggregate maps of resident population by race.  Apply race equity criteria for allocating funds through city budgeting process for Capital Improvement Projects, Pedestrian and Cycling Safety (PACS) Fund and Operating Budget. 8. Inclusive Communications and Technology Services(I-6, S-8, S-11)  The city’s communications are an important way we convey answers to the following questions: A. Who are we? B. What are our values? C. What is our past? D. Who are we becoming?  If it is the city’s intention to ensure that all residents feel they are a part of that story, this needs to be strategically and systematically operationalized. This work should be informed by ongoing relationship with residents, residents of color and residents for whom English is a second language – a robust community engagement approach (see Recommendation on Community Engagement).  Establish a community advisory board for city communications. There is a closed feedback loop for quality improvement of communications tactics and vehicles. When community input is gathered, it is largely through reader surveys (those already consuming the publications). Particular emphasis should be placed on reaching residents of color and those new to the community.  Apply race and equity lens to the process for developing communications content: Who writes the stories? Whose stories are included? Whose voices are included?  Formally set and implement plain language targets for city communications.  Review of the city’s Limited English Proficiency (LEP) policy. Is a policy in place? If not, develop an LEP policy and implement. 39  Using insights gained from new partnerships and relationships with community, partner with City departments to find new ways to market and communicate to POC in our community. 9. Quality of Life Survey (I-7)  Report of Results of Biennial Quality of Life Survey should include survey results compared by race/ethnicity to determine how well residents of color are served by city programs, services and policies; to identify issues faced by residents of color; and to determine whether residents of color believe they have an opportunity to participate in community and government matters and have their voice heard, so that survey results can be used to better inform the city’s race equity goals and to benchmark progress toward those goals. This data should be reviewed by staff and addressed in the staff report to council.  For the next Biennial Quality of Life Survey, rewrite the module that was added in the 2017 Survey to query race equity work; the module used in 2017 was incomplete/insufficient, and equates this work with “cultural events” and learning about other cultures and traditions. Only one question addresses inclusion or representation. This module was added due to the focus on Race and Equity work, but not a single question uses the word “race” or “equity.”  Add module related to Police and public interaction to the Quality of Life Survey. The current question asks respondents to rate the “quality” of police services. This may or may not be an indicator of satisfaction with experience, visibility or community interactions. Given the amount of attention public interaction with law enforcement receives, it would be very useful to have a more robust understanding of the public’s views. 10. Crimes Report (I-9)  Review Police Department policy for posting individual names on the department website’s “Crimes Report”; revise to balance public safety with protection of due process through a racial equity lens. 11. Police Data Collection and Management (I-10)  Require Data Collection to provide the ability to make informed policy and procedure adjustments. A. Collect data regularly on community attitudes and perceptions about local law enforcement through an anonymous survey, including race data. B. Collect and analyze demographic data, including but not limited to race, on all stops (with outcome, by race), searches and seizures (all detentions) in accordance with 21st Century Policing’s best practices C. Collect data about non-criminal tickets to create transparency. D. Analyze the data on a regular basis and share the information with the public. Put actions in place when adjustments to policy or practices are needed. E. After a process is developed for the collection of race data the department should provide the officers training on why it is important to collect race data and how the data will be collected and used. 40 12. Public Safety Training Standards (I-11)  Ensure that police officers and fire department personnel have the knowledge and skills to be racially and culturally responsive and treat each person with dignity and respect. A. Incorporate Best Practice Racial Equity Training to include implicit bias, microaggressions, etc. similar to what the city of Seattle is doing B. Align field training officer processes with 21st Century Policy to ensure that they match up with the guardian culture of policing. (from 21st Century Policing) C. Include community members as trainers – for example in sessions on community perceptions about law enforcement tactics, levels of trust, and areas for dialogue. D. Update performance reviews to ensure racial equity competency requirements are met. 13. Police Department Community Outreach (S-2)  Place the Department Policy Manual on the Department website for public viewing.  Develop a strategy to improve Police Department communications. The Work Group feels the department needs to develop an ongoing strategy to publicize and promote the Police Department, including but not limited to the increased aggressive use of social media.  Evaluate and improve the Department’s current community outreach programs.  Build trust between Police and Community A. Create Resident Oversight Board to review complaints of police misconduct. B. Review current outreach (community involvement) programs, evaluate the efficacy of each of those programs, prioritize department focus to ensure participation of people of color, and introduce new ones as needed. 14. Police Policies (S-3)  Analyze policies related to external and independent criminal investigations and prosecutions for Officer Involved shootings and In-Custody death incidents. (Policies 500.00 – Authorized Use of Force, 520.00 – Deadly Force, 530.00 – Discharge of Firearms, 720.00 – City Jail: Booking Intake Release).  Evaluate Department Policy Manual through a race and equity lens, related to Use of Force, specifically focusing on training, investigations, prosecution, data collection and information. (Policies 500.00 – Authorized Use of Force, 510.00 – Use of Non-Lethal Force, 520.00 – Deadly Force, 530.00 – Discharge of Firearms).  Review and add provision to current policy requiring officers to identify to individuals stopped or detained as soon as practical and reasonable the following (Policies 320.00 – Conduct of Department Members, 605.00 – Persons Detained or In-Custody): A. The reason for their stop, and B. The reason a search is being conducted, if applicable.  Review the department’s Policy 690.00 – Impartial Policing. Ensure that this policy meets the stated goal of “reaffirming the Department’s commitment to impartial/unbiased policing and to reinforce procedures that serve to assure the public that the Department is providing service and enforcing laws in a fair and equitable manner to all.” 41 15. Training (S-4)  Research and implement successful models for training in the areas of implicit bias, cultural diversity, police legitimacy, and procedural justice. The work could potentially coincide, at least in part, with the GARE/Race and Equity Task Force work currently underway. 16. Affordable Housing (I-1)  Language edit to the Edina Affordable Housing Policy: The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing in order to create and maintain a diverse population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the City.  Require review of above Policy at a frequency sufficient to address current conditions and needs of constantly changing housing market and City demographics. Review policy with a race and equity lens to include language relating housing to equity and disparities.  As part of this review, address the significant need for affordable housing of the types desired by families of color who wish to live in Edina, such as single family housing, rental units that that will not become unaffordable after a set period of time, and units within the Edina Public School District boundaries. Use and expand the existing Come Home 2 Edina program and aggressively advertise available properties and program requirements to families of color who may wish to live in Edina, perhaps starting with families of color whose children are already attending Edina Public Schools or who have applied to attend Edina public schools, as well as employees of the city of Edina and Edina businesses.  Develop and maintain a database on the number and location of affordable units throughout Edina, including rented and owned, existing and new single and multi-family family homes, condominiums, apartments. Inventory the most vulnerable properties to redevelopment and renter displacement. Include in this database those rental units for which Section 8 vouchers can be used.  Review the affordable housing policy with a race-equity lens and consider removing the option for the developers to opt-out of building affordable units.  Apply race and equity lens to the affordable housing funds that the developers pay into if they opt-out and develop a policy to ensure that those funds are deployed with the aim of increasing racially equitable affordable housing.  There is no incentive for the sellers to take FHA loans resulting in discrimination. The City should develop a policy to address this issue.  Develop specific goals to increase the number of affordable housing units by “X” and the rental units where section 8 vouchers can be used by “Y”. These goals should be included in the comprehensive plan. The city should work with tenants, property owners and developers to develop a plan to ensure that the affordable housing goals are achieved. 17. Zoning / Code (I-2)  Develop a tool (or adopt one used by another city) to review Edina zoning regulations through a racial equity lens to change or remove language that may contribute to racial disparities.  Develop and include language with the intention of reducing inequities. 42  This type of review will be resource intensive, and we recommend contracting with or hiring a racial equity consultant or manager to lead this project and oversee others as needed. 18. Ensure the following set of guidelines to create an environment where people of all races, ethnicities and cultural backgrounds feel welcome and included is implemented and delivered consistently across all Edina city facilities. (F – 1)  Conduct regular (at least annual) training for all employees in customer service, racial/cultural awareness and responsiveness, conflict resolution, city-wide procedures and policies, and other training needs as identified to ensure that all facility guests, regardless of race or background, enjoy a consistent welcoming experience.  Ensure employees are trained on how to support key situations, including first-time guests and users, who may need special support to have a strong first experience.  Ensure that all Staff, full or part time, are aware of City code of conduct, safety and security procedures and language interpretation services, cost options based on age, family groups for scholarship categories. Ensure all City staff also are aware of current equity and inclusion initiatives. Conduct annual reporting regarding such training and outcomes.  Ensure each facility has wayfinding signage (to help guests navigate the facility and know where to go) and printed materials in multiple languages (at least top 3 non-English primary languages in the community – example: Spanish, Hmong, Somali). Ensure digital and printed communications reflects racial and cultural diversity through images, stories and voices.  If the facility has artwork and décor, ensure that it reflects diversity of race and culture.  Implement a process and channel by which facilities share and utilize racial equity best practices. 19. Equitable Access to City Facilities (F – 2)  Access to information and opportunity for input: Review web, print and social media materials to ensure they serve a racially and culturally diverse population, and implement translation services for the website and include print materials in appropriate multiple languages (based on top non-English primary languages in Minnesota). A. Implement access to translation services for staff to access when working with guests who speak English as a second language. B. Ensure any and all facility and park plans reflect a racial equity lens by intentionally seeking input from a racially, culturally and geographically diverse group in planning and review (ex: Braemar Master plan, establishing new or expanded facilities, etc.) C. Ensure that City Council presentation (ex: Annual Report) are delivered across multiple locations, to ensure people who live in different parts of the city have access.  Financial access: Deliver staff training on scholarship fund availability so that all staff are familiar with and know how to speak about them or know where to direct guests for more information. Consider a sliding scale fee structure or identify other ways to ensure consistency and increase affordability for guests. 43  Transportation access: Add Metro transit link to website to highlight public transportation options if available to the facility and add printed transit information at facility kiosks or on-site. For those facilities currently difficult to access via public transportation, develop a plan to create new transportation options to address the gap (example: a new shared shuttle service).  Access to programming: Develop alternate ways to register for programs or use of facility, to accommodate those who do not have ready access to a computer. Establish time for staff to do in-person outreach to areas in the city to reach and welcome new and underserved populations in the community 20. Parks and Rec Data and Utilization (S-5, S-6, S-9, S-10)  Parks and recreation programs should collect demographic data about program utilization across all users or participants.  In partnership with communities of color, identify if barriers to utilization exist and elicit solutions from community members and users. Barriers might include price, programming, location, sense of belonging, language and cultural or religious values. 21. Parks and Rec Policy for associations and race-based complaints (S-7)  Require youth sports associations and any association that utilize Edina Park and Rec facilities/parks to operate in accordance with the city's expectation regarding race equity and inclusion.  Establish policy for use and create enforcement mechanism for abuse or lack of enforcement of such policy.  Create clear city expectation regarding Race Equity policy and post within all sports facilities. Provide written policy to all associations and organizations using Edina Park and Rec Facilities.  Establish expectations that all outside vendors will adhere to and established process and procedure for dealing with race-based issues and discriminatory practices. 44 Next Steps & Conclusion After the Final Report June 25, 2018 Race & Equity Team Final Check in Meeting 45 Appendix Appendix Guide A. Edina Race & Equity Full Recommendations B. City Government Structure and Department Functions C. Police Report for October 14th Incident D. Facilitator RFP E. Citizens League RFP Submission F. GARE Racial Equity Tool Kit G. Orange Method H. Task Force Data Summary I. Working Group Data Summary J. Executive Leadership Team Data Summary K. Edina Community Data Summary L. Link to Online Survey Results M. Survey of Demographics for City-Appointed Boards and Commissions N. Findings Outside of City Government Scope O. Facilities Working Group Assessment tool P. 2017 Edina Quality of Life Survey Q. Next Steps After Final Report R. Glossary F-1, F-2, F-3 Edina Race & Equity Taskforce – Facilities Working Group Edina Race & Equity Task Force Purpose The Edina Race & Equity Taskforce’s purpose is to make recommendations on policies, practices and strategies for the City of Edina to address, identify and eliminate racial disparities with the project scope of work of: • Identify race based disparities in Edina’s city government, facilities, services and institutions. • Propose remedies and solution to the city government policies and operating practices that are creating the disparities. • Encourage stronger connection and sense of belonging to and in the City of Edina to ensure that Edina is a welcoming community for all people. Race & Equity Facilities Working Group Objectives The Facilities Working Group objectives were to research, evaluate, and prepare recommendations for ensuring racial equity in City facilities (physical spaces). The vision of the Facilities Working Group was informed in part by Edina’s Vision statement. Our vision is for the experience in facilities across Edina to be inclusive and connected… • welcoming to people of all races, cultures and backgrounds • delivering a consistent experience across the network of facilities, and • accessible (in transportation, affordability and opportunity) to all current and future users of Edina facilities Our Approach: Research and Evaluation The Facilities Working Group did the following to meet its responsibilities: • Assessed 10 facilities applying an assessment tool developed by the group. • Reviewed reports provided by Citizens League for its community input/data collection resources – interviews, community online survey, small community group discussions and large community meetings. • Reviewed reports provided by the City – Vision Edina, City of Edina Park, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan, and Human Rights and Relations Commission reports. • Researched best practices from other cities, including Seattle and St. Paul. The Facilities Working Group made a decision early to spend the majority of its time focusing on 10 of Edina’s facilities, its 9 enterprise facilities and its main public office, City Hall. Time and the limited size of the working group were determining factors as well as the fact that these 10 facilities are staffed by the City of Edina regularly and are open to the public. Liquor stores were not visited. Outdoor parks and trails were not visited and reviewed through its strategic plan and community reporting mentioned above and included in the recommendations. The 10 facilities reviewed were: 1. Edina Aquatic Center 2. Edina Art Center 3. Centennial Lakes Park 4. City Hall 5. Edinborough Park 6. Braemar Arena 7. Braemar Field 8. Braemar Golf Course & Club House 9. Braemar Golf Dome 10. Edina Senior Center The Facilities Working Group developed a Facilities Assessment Tool that assessed the following: (A copy of the assessment tool is attached.) • General Welcoming • Décor & Artwork • Diversity of Staff & Management • Attendees/Participants – who comes • Accessibility of Location (transportation bus/bike/walk – we did not look at ability accessibility) • Operating Hours • Fee Structure • Signage and Way Finding • Facility Promotion and Marketing • Food Choices At least two team members visited each site and completed assessments that were reviewed at group meetings. Comments from other team members who had visited or used the facilities were also considered. The above process to research and evaluate facilities led to the Facilities Working Group’s recommendations to help ensure racial equity in the City of Edina facilities. High-Level Overview of Facilities Working Group Recommendations The Goal: All guests, of all races, ethnicities, cultures and backgrounds, have equitable access and experience a welcoming and inclusive consistent experience at all Edina city facilities, making them feel like it is a place they belong. How We Propose to Get There: Recommendation #1: Implement guidelines consistently across all Edina city facilities to create environments where people of all races, ethnicities, cultures and backgrounds feel welcome and included Recommendation #2: Ensure racially and culturally equitable access to our City facilities and related information and opportunities through 4 key categories of recommendations Recommendation #3: Increase the racial and cultural diversity of the City facilities workforce, including leadership staff, through 4 key recommended actions Recommendation #1: Ensure the following set of guidelines to create an environment where people of all races, ethnicities and cultural backgrounds feel welcome and included is implemented and delivered consistently across all Edina city facilities. 1. Conduct regular (at least annual) training for all employees in customer service, racial/cultural awareness and responsiveness, conflict resolution, city-wide procedures and policies, and other training needs as identified to ensure that all facility guests, regardless of race or background, enjoy a consistent welcoming experience. Ensure employees are trained on how to support key situations, including first-time guests and users, who may need special support to have a strong first experience. Ensure that all Staff, full or part time, are aware of City code of conduct, safety and security procedures and language interpretation services, cost options based on age, family groups for scholarship categories. Ensure all City staff also are aware of current equity and inclusion initiatives. Conduct annual reporting regarding such training and outcomes. 2. Ensure each facility has wayfinding signage (to help guests navigate the facility and know where to go) and printed materials in multiple languages (at least top 3 non- English primary languages in the community – example: Spanish, Hmong, Somali). 3. Ensure digital and printed communications reflects racial and cultural diversity through images, stories and voices. 4. If the facility has artwork and décor, ensure that it reflects diversity of race and culture. 5. Implement a process and channel by which facilities share and utilize racial equity best practices. Data Supporting Recommendation: Facilities working group members used an assessment tool to gather data on each of the 10 facilities. This tool was created to evaluate the facilities based on the input gathered from the community meetings and surveys and identify the most significant areas of opportunity. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Site visits, research and information from Citizens league How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Describe how this change impacts racial equity? What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Is this a long-term project? yes Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Additional staff Other Working Group Comments: 1. Continue to assess additional facilities within the city including parks and trails. Recommendation #2: We strive to ensure racially and culturally equitable access to all of our City facilities. Implement the guidelines below across these categories of access: 1. Access to information and opportunity for input: Review web, print and social media materials to ensure they serve a racially and culturally diverse population, and implement translation services for the website and include print materials in appropriate multiple languages (based on top non-English primary languages in Minnesota). Implement access to translation services for staff to access when working with guests who speak English as a second language. Ensure any and all facility and park plans reflect a racial equity lens by intentionally seeking input from a racially, culturally and geographically diverse group in planning and review (ex: Braemar Master plan, establishing new or expanded facilities, etc.) Ensure that City Council presentation (ex: Annual Report) are delivered across multiple locations, to ensure people who live in different parts of the city have access. 2. Financial access: Deliver staff training on scholarship fund availability so that all staff are familiar with and know how to speak about them or know where to direct guests for more information. Consider a sliding scale fee structure or identify other ways to ensure consistency and increase affordability for guests. 3. Transportation access: Add Metro transit link to website to highlight public transportation options if available to the facility and add printed transit information at facility kiosks or on-site. For those facilities currently difficult to access via public transportation, develop a plan to create new transportation options to address the gap (example: a new shared shuttle service). 4. Access to programming: Develop alternate ways to register for programs or use of facility, to accommodate those who do not have ready access to a computer. Establish time for staff to do in-person outreach to areas in the city to reach and welcome new and underserved populations in the community Data Supporting Recommendation: Work Group Site visits, website information review, informal information sharing from community members and neighbors and information garnered from the Citizens League reports Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? • Yes Is the activity in scope? • Yes What is community feedback? • Multiple work group assessments, citizens league work & observation How will recommendation impact system changes etc.? • It will create better trained & prepared staff. It will enhance staff practices, accountability & impact. Is this a long-term project? • yes Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what resources will be required? • Yes – it will require a commitment to additional staff resources and perhaps a commitment to contracted services for training and measurement tools to assess progress Other Working Group Comments: Actively invite input from more people who live and/or work in Edina in all neighborhoods. We need deeper research into the full range of our community o People working in Edina, especially in service jobs (labor, restaurant, child care, residential services etc.) o Our more diverse populations ▪ Southdale area Edinborough, Parklawn & Cornelia neighborhoods ▪ Early Learning Center families ▪ 66 West residents ▪ YMCA members ▪ Oak Glen Housing residents ▪ Cultural Liaison’s from Edina Public Schools Recommendation #3: Increase the racial and cultural diversity of the City facilities workforce, including leadership staff. 1. Set goals and develop specific action plans to increase staff of color and staff that speak multiple languages, including Spanish, Hmong and Somali and others. 2. Publicly report on the progress of these goals on an annual basis. 3. Review and adopt inclusive hiring practices to include more racially and culturally diverse outreach, inclusive application questions, recruitment, selection and interview processes. This may overlap with recommendations from other Working Groups and can be consolidated. We recommend identifying someone to be charged with developing an inclusive hiring toolkit and process, including a plan to train all hiring managers on those practices and accountability measures. 4. Identify specific opportunities to increase racial and cultural diversity on work teams. For example, identify ways to include racially and culturally diverse perspectives for action planning and implementation of these guidelines. Data Supporting Recommendation: Visits to facilities from work group, research of best practices in other cities, information from Citizens League Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? • Yes Is the activity in scope? • Yes What is community feedback? • multiple work group assessments, citizens league work & observation How will recommendation impact system changes etc.? • It will create an accountability loop in reaching diversity goals that are set Is this a long-term project? • Yes Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what resources will be required? • Yes – it will require a commitment to additional staff resources and perhaps a commitment to contracted services for training. Consider hiring an Equity & Inclusion person to monitor, assess and evaluate progress toward goals I-1 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendation Submitted By: C. Bremer, E. Rehm, J. Brown Recommendation: A. Language edit to the Edina Affordable Housing Policy: The City recognizes the need to provide affordable housing in order to create and maintain a diverse population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the City. B. Require review of above Policy at a frequency sufficient to address current conditions and needs of constantly changing housing market and City demographics. Review policy with a race and equity lens to include language relating housing to equity and disparities. C. As part of this review, address the significant need for affordable housing of the types desired by families of color who wish to live in Edina, such as single family housing, rental units that that will not become unaffordable after a set period of time, and units within the Edina Public School District boundaries. Use and expand the existing Come Home 2 Edina program and aggressively advertise available properties and program requirements to families of color who may wish to live in Edina, perhaps starting with families of color whose children are already attending Edina Public Schools or who have applied to attend Edina public schools, as well as employees of the city of Edina and Edina businesses. . D. Develop and maintain a database on the number and location of affordable units throughout Edina, including rented and owned, existing and new single and multi-family family homes, condominiums, apartments. Inventory the most vulnerable properties to redevelopment and renter displacement. Include in this database those rental units for which Section 8 vouchers can be used.. E. Review the affordable housing policy and consider removing the option for the developers to opt-out. F. Apply race and equity lens to the affordable housing funds that the developers pay into if they opt-out and develop a policy to ensure that those funds are appropriately deployed. G. There is no incentive for the sellers to take FHA loans resulting in discrimination. The City should develop a policy to address this issue. H. Develop specific goals to increase the number of affordable housing units by “X” and the rental units where section 8 vouchers can be used by “Y”. These goals should be included in the comprehensive plan. The city should work with tenants, property owners and developers to develop a plan to ensure that the affordable housing goals are achieved. Data Supporting Recommendation: From Edina Comp. Plan Update 2008: “An inventory of estimated market values of Edina’s housing stock reveals that about 20 percent or 3,467 housing units are valued at/or below the Council’s affordable home purchase price. The type of housing deemed affordable within the city is overwhelmingly multi-family. One percent of single-family and duplex homes are deemed affordable for purchase by this analysis.” (p. 5-3) Edina's Racist Past is Focus of Wikipedia "Edit War" Minneapolis StarTribune 02-05-2015 Edina's Confused Racial History, from Utopian Village to Bleached Suburb City Pages 02-20-2017 Maggie Yancey's 1881 Geology Book Hennepin History Museum Blog 03-06-2017 New Research Explores History of Housing Discrimination in Minneapolis Minnesota Daily 03-29-2017 Discrimination is Not De Facto (Review of the book, “The Color of Law”) Slate 05-05-2017 Come Home 2 Edina Edina Housing Foundation, edinamn.gov Map: Predominant racial or ethnic group, U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 Minnesota State Demographic Center The Racist Housing Policy That Made Your Neighborhood The Atlantic 05-22-2014 Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes, the affordable housing policy as an institution of the City. What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Some low-income Edina residents of color have expressed a desire for their students to attend Edina schools, but they cannot afford housing within the school district boundaries. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Likely language edits to Affordable Housing Policy and Increase Planning Commission, Community Development, and Housing and Edina Housing Foundation workload. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? Explicit language within the City’s Housing policy regarding intention to make housing more safe and affordable, which will make it more available to families of color whose incomes are typically lower than those of white families in the region. Making Edina accessible to individuals and families who have been able to consider living in Edina previously will help to build the diversity of Edina into the future. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Continued exclusion people of color - especially those who are Black, Hispanic and indigenous - from Edina housing because of high prices and perceptions of being unwelcome based on history.. Is this a long-term project? Yes, long term change over time . Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes, additional assessment and policy development needed. Implementation would require additional staff time from Community Development staff to support regular review of Affordable Housing Policy through Race and Equity lens. Working Group Comments: Quality, safe and affordable housing is a fundamental factor in the quality of life for all residents, and inequities in housing contribute to disparities in many other areas including income and health. Planning and zoning regulations around construction and maintenance of the housing stock in Edina are integral to maintaining quality housing for all residents. By adding the word “create” in Recommendation A, the Working Group is responding to the history of housing discrimination in Edina and surrounding communities that pushed early black residents out of their Edina homes. Discriminatory policies and practices, while not unique to Edina, had an exceptionally perverse effect in Edina because families of color were denied the ability to build wealth and obtain excellent educations for their children. For those not allowed to live in Edina and other desirable locations much was lost, affecting subsequent generations. We believe that Edina must do more than avoid discrimination going forward. We also need to work to redress inequalities and injustices created in the past that continue to benefit the largely white population of Edina. Our elected representatives and skilled city staff can build on our recommendations to move this intention forward. Task Force Comments: Map of Affordable Housing in Edina 1. Yorktown Continental 2. Yorkdale Townhomes 3. Oak Glen Townhomes 4. Edinborough/Centennial Lakes 5. Summit Point 6. South Haven 7. 66 West 8. Yorktown Gardens 9. 6500 France I-2 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Institutions Submitted By: Chris Bremer, Jeff Brown, Eric Rehm Recommendation: Zoning Code Develop a tool (or adopt one used by another city) to review Edina zoning regulations through a racial equity lens to change or remove language that may contribute to racial disparities. Develop and include language with the intention of reducing inequities. This type of review will be resource intensive, and we recommend contracting with or hiring a racial equity consultant or manager to lead this project and oversee others as needed. Data Supporting Recommendation: Racial Origins of Zoning in American Cities book chapter from “Urban Planning and the African American Community” 1997 'Snob Zoning' is Racial Housing Segregation by Another Name The Washington Post 09-25-2017 Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes, the zoning code, in coordination with the comprehensive plan, is the backbone of land use regulation in the City. What is the community feedback about this recommendation? The zoning regulations are so lengthy and complex that the community only becomes aware of them when they are immediately impacted. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Likely language edits to the zoning chapter of City Code, affecting land use, home occupations, and district regulations in the City. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? Zoning rules about apartment buildings and lot sizes can limit availability of affordable housing (see ‘Snob Zoning’ link). Also, some items in the zoning regulations, for example those related to loitering and noise, are enforced based on complaints and may be used as means to engage City staff as proxies to harass people of color. Other regulations, such as the requirement to store trash cans out of sight, place unequal burdens on owners of smaller affordable homes in light of today’s larger trash and recycling containers and the smaller garages of older homes. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Lower income people and people of color can be harassed using zoning regulations. Is this a long-term project? Yes, the zoning chapter is extensive and a comprehensive review would need to be done over time. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes. It is not known whether the zoning code has been reviewed in this way previously. Implementation would require staff and consultant time to review code through a racial equity lens. Working Group Comments: The City’s zoning code is lengthy and contains a wide range of regulations regarding land use in the City. Some of these regulations may have unintended consequences for people of color. Task Force Comments: I-3 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Institutions Submitted By: Chris Bremer, Jeff Brown, Eric Rehm Recommendation: Complaint Response Develop City-wide procedure and policy for responding to complaints that are perceived by staff as possibly racially motivated. Provide direction and support for all City staff when navigating this type of complaint. Collect data on complaints that seem discriminatory in nature, including who makes the complaints and about whom. Apply this policy also to complaints against those belonging to other protected groups. Data Supporting Recommendation: Website Meant to Connect Neighbors Hears Complaints of Racial Profiling New York Times 05-19-2016 When Racial Boundaries Are Blurry, Neighbors Take Complaints Straight to 311 CityLab 08-24-2015 Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes, complaint response is a function in many departments. What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Staff members have said that this problem exists. It is commonly reported elsewhere (see linked articles). How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? A uniform policy or language must be developed and distributed to all staff who respond to complaints, providing direction for how to respond to complaints that seem to be based on discrimination. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? By having direction and support, City staff will be able to avoid being used as proxy harassers and can follow up on complaints appropriately without fearing they will run afoul of City policy or practice. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Currently, complainants can remain anonymous and use City staff to harass neighbors with repeated complaint investigations. Is this a long-term project? No, policy and philosophy can be evaluated and determined in the short term. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? No. Working Group Comments: The City has received feedback regarding the use of the City’s response to complaints to harass people of color. Multiple departments in the City, including the Community Development Department, respond to resident complaints on a wide variety of issues. In some cases, residents of color have felt targeted by the City while the identity of the complainant is protected by data privacy rules. Task Force Comments: I-4 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendation Submitted By: K. Puram, R. Cooper, T. Fox Recommendation: City Department Demographic Representation Increase the number of people of color, and people with Multi Language skills within City Departments to more closely reflect the demographics of Hennepin County. City goals should reflect the demographics of Hennepin County, as they interact with residents from surrounding communities as well as Edina residents. For example: a) Participate in the POC (People of Color) Job Fairs. b) Set measurable goals for diversifying workforce to account for shifting City demographics. c) Assess and revise job descriptions, prioritizing public-facing jobs, to include racial equity competencies. d) Explore programs like Pathway to Policing and Youth Development Programs to help create opportunities for diverse candidates, and add one FTE for police department to participate in Pathways to Policing Program as soon as possible. e) Offer additional incentives to diversify recruitment (e.g. offer admission to Edina schools for children). f) Promote Exchange Programs for police and fire professionals to spend time in Edina. g) Create pipeline of potential candidates by engaging children of color within the school system to highlight career pathways within City government. Data Supporting Recommendation: 1. Fire Department does not have any people of color, and only one woman serving (and she is not Full-Time) 2. Police Department has two people of color, and seven women serving. 3. Survey respondents feel the city poorly responds to reports of race-based discrimination. 4. Survey respondents express concern about police conduct with non-white community members. 5. Survey respondents feel that there is uneasiness and suspicion around how race plays a role in government hiring practices. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? See Above How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Hiring guidelines will change by requiring the city to expand its channels for reaching out. The scoring process of the current state- mandated point system (Veterans Preference) for hiring should include race and equity considerations. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? More people of color and women will make it into the talent pool. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? No racial and gender balance in the Police and Fire departments. Is this a long-term project? Yes Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? HR Department needs to assess the Police and Fire Department’s hiring practices. Working Group Comments: We know the budget for 2018 includes the funding of three new hires within the Police Department. Based on our recommendations, one person of color should be hired. City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendations Submitted By: K. Puram, R. Cooper, T. Fox, K. Bass, P. Arsenault I-5 Recommendation: Community Engagement Plan and Staffing 1. Develop a policy and procedures that includes the city’s philosophy about the purpose and value of the city’s efforts in community engagement. Create an intentional community engagement plan that outlines the city’s community engagement approach and task a city employee with overseeing /directing community engagement work either by revising a current employee’s job duties or creating a new position, i.e., a plan/person to: ● Oversee building relationships with all residents, paying particular attention to understand experience of communities of color, with time designated to visit neighborhood events, establish relationships with religious leaders, and neighborhood and ethnic associations; ● Coordinate volunteer opportunities and public participation when there are decisions for which the city is seeking public feedback and other types of public involvement, such as Boards, Commissions, Task Forces and other appointed positions to ensure that residents of color are included and heard 2. Revise the Human Services RFP to include a deliverable around funding community-based organizations lead by communities of color to assist the city with engagement. Data Supporting Recommendation: (1) 2017 Quality of Life Survey data Edina is becoming more diverse. Police need to adapt and be sensitive to the cultural diversity. There is a perception of police racism, driving while brown/black, privacy violations through Google searches by police. About half of respondents felt that expanding cultural events, enhancing promotion and awareness of cultural events and providing educational opportunities about different cultures and customs locally and around the world. (2) Community Data (Collected as part of Race Equity Initiative) Many observe that there are few or no people of color /American Indian that represent the city in government leadership n government-appointed groups. (3) HRRC Community Conversations December 2015 Report included the following comments: “Resident who are not citizens feel like they have no voice in Edina.” “My language and culture make me feel like there are barriers to participating.” “There is no art from my culture in the Edina art events or fairs.” Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? See Above How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Good community outreach and successful community engagement with all voices heard leads to better understanding of what polices, processes and procedures need to be improved to ensure people of color participate in government appointed groups and feel welcome in all areas of the community. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? Government makes decisions without knowing how they impact communities of color. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Few people of color are in government leadership and appointed taskforces/boards/commissions. Lack of effective community outreach and inclusion lead to distrust in the government, and decisions that do not serve people of color well because their voice is not included in the decision making process. Is this a long-term project? Yes Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Funding a community engagement division / position. Recommend city review all RFPs for the past 3 years to identify public dollars spent on community engagement efforts by consultants. This may be a revenue neutral decision if resources are deployed differently. How are we spending these dollars and what value are we getting in return? Working Group Comments: What VALUE (beyond input) do our community engagement efforts bring to the city? Other decision making including policies, quality of city services and relevance of city programming flows from the intention, skill and racial equity competence in the city’s community engagement practice. Do we aspire to be in relationship with residents to improve services and meet needs? Then we must consider the infrastructure, resources and skills attendant to building those relationships. Developing a community engagement philosophy, approach and infrastructure to support will take time to implement. Review models and best practices from other communities. In the interim, considering revising the Human Services RFP to include a deliverable around funding community-based organizations with relationships in communities of color to assist the city with engagement. Task Force Comments: I-6 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendation Submitted By: Recommendation: City Communications and Technology Services The city’s communications are an important way we convey answers to the following questions: Who are we? What are our values? What is our past? Who are we becoming? 1. If it is the city’s intention to ensure that all residents feel they are a part of that story, this needs to be and systematically operationalized. This work should be informed by ongoing relationship ts, residents of color and residents for whom English is a second language – a robust engagement approach (see Recommendation on Community Engagement). 2. Establish a community advisory board for city communications. There is a closed feedback loop for quality improvement of communications tactics and vehicles. When community input is gathered, it is largely der surveys (those already consuming the publications). Particular emphasis should be aching residents of color and those new to the community. 3. Apply race and equity lens to the process for developing communications content: Who writes the stories? Whose stories are included? Whose voices are included? 4. Formally set and implement plain language targets for city communications. 5. Review of the city’s Limited English Proficiency (LEP) policy. Is a policy in place? If not, develop an LEP policy and implement. Data Supporting Recommendation: 2017 Quality of Life Survey collects demographic data on race of respondents; whether respondents are Spanish, Hispanic or Latino; and whether a language of than English is spoken at home; however, the report does not differentiate responses by Race/ethnicity. For example: • The 2017 Report highlights that three quarters of residents evaluated “sense of community” as “excellent” or “good” however, when that response is disaggregated by race, there is a statistically significant difference in the answer - only 59% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and / or not white evaluated “sense of community” as “excellent” or “good.” • The job Edina does at welcoming resident involvement was rated as “excellent” or “good” by 65% of respondents overall and 48% of Hispanic and/or not white respondents. Communications is an important tool for conveying a sense of welcome to all residents. • Similarly, 83% of respondents overall evaluated “value of services for taxes paid” as “excellent” or “good” and only 66% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and / or not white agreed (again, statistically significant difference in evaluation). • “Opportunities to participate in community matters” was evaluated as “excellent” or “good” by 78% of respondents who identified as white/not Hispanic, but by only 67% by Hispanic and / or not white respondents. HRRC Community Conversations December 2015 Report included the following participant observations: • “Edina feels like a close knit and superior group that doesn’t let others in.” • “Residents who are not citizens feel like they have no voice in Edina.” • “My language and culture make me feel like there are barriers to participating.” • “Sometimes the city is not responsive to citizen issues.” “About Town [doesn’t] reflect the diversity of Edina.” Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force ? What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Through the Race Equity survey and focus groups, there is a pervasive sense of not feeling welcome. City Communications are an important vehicle to address this finding. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Expanding the range of community voices contributing to our communications strategies, tactics and methods will ensure that communications services are effective and of value for all residents. Changes will include: --Selection of communications methods we deploy; --Increasing the effectiveness and value of printed materials; --Ensuring all residents’ experiences and history are represented in the stories we tell. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? City communications ensure that all residents experience the same level of service. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? City fails to effectively reach all residents with important communications, and is limited in its ability to create a sense of belonging and welcome via communications Is this a long-term project? No Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Working Group Comments: Re Rec 1: Review comp city Bellevue, WA example: https://www.bellevuewa.gov/discover-bellevue/about- us/ Re Rec 2: Message Matters: Inclusive Communications in a Diverse World https://www.lmc.org/page/1/MessageMattersMarApr2017.jsp Re Rec 3: Example: Review Hometown Heroes feature on city’s website. How are these individuals identified? What is the process? What are the criteria? Who chooses them? Re Rec 4: A free online software tool that calculates readability https://www.online- utility.org/english/readability_test_and_improve.jsp Re Rec 5: A request can be made to translate materials, but the city’s ability to do so is written in English and difficult to locate on the city’s website. The ability to translate materials should be clearly stated in the top 3- 4 languages (guided by LEP policy) of the city prominently on our website and in printed materials. Task Force Comments: I-7 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendation Submitted By: K. Bass, P. Arseneault, K. Curtin Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force ? Recommendation: Data – Quality of Life Survey Biennial Quality of Life Survey: 1. Report of Results of Biennial Quality of Life Survey should include survey results compared by race/ethnicity to determine how well residents of color are served by city programs, services and policies; to identify issues faced by residents of color; and to determine whether residents of color believe they have an opportunity to participate in community and government matters and have their voice heard, so that survey results can be used to better inform the city’s race equity goals and to benchmark progress toward those goals. This data should be reviewed by staff and addressed in the staff report to council. 2. For the next Biennial Quality of Life Survey, rewrite the module that was added in the 2017 Survey to query race equity work; the module used in 2017 was incomplete/insufficient, and equates this work with “cultural events” and learning about other cultures and traditions. Only one question addresses inclusion or representation. This module was added due to the focus on Race and Equity work, but not a single question uses the word “race” or “equity.” 3. Add module related to Police and public interaction to the Quality of Life Survey. The current question asks respondents to rate the “quality” of police services. This may or may not be an indicator of satisfaction with experience, visibility or community interactions. Given the amount of attention public interaction with law enforcement receives, it would be very useful to have a more robust understanding of the public’s views. Data Supporting Recommendation: 2017 Quality of Life Survey collects demographic data on race of respondents; whether respondents are Spanish, Hispanic or Latino; and whether a language of than English is spoken at home; however, the report does not differentiate responses by Race/ethnicity. For example: ● The 2017 Report highlights that three quarters of residents evaluated “sense of community” as “excellent” or “good” however, when that response is disaggregated by race, there is a statistically significant difference in the answer - only 59% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and / or not white evaluated “sense of community” as “excellent” or “good.” ● Similarly, 79% of respondents overall evaluated “opportunities to volunteer” as “excellent” or “good” and only 63% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and / or not white agreed (again, statistically significant difference in evaluation). ● “Opportunities to participate in community matters was evaluated as “excellent” or “good” by 78% of respondents who identified as white/not Hispanic, but by only 67% by Hispanic and / or not white respondents. ● 67% of Hispanic and / or not white respondents said it was “essential” or “very important” to promote and provide opportunities for diverse representation in local leadership, advisory and policy making roles, versus only 55% of white respondents rating the importance as “essential” or “very.” What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Many observe there are few or no people of color in Government leadership and appointed groups How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Data on disparate impact can be used to recognize need for Change and can support changes in policies, processes and Procedures e.g.: When survey responses on quality of Edina services are disaggregated by race, there is a statistically significant difference in answers -- 92% of respondents overall evaluated “snow removal” as “excellent” or “good” and only 78% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and / or not white evaluated “snow removal” as “excellent” or “good; --75% % of respondents overall evaluated “sidewalk maintenance” as “excellent” or “good” and only 62% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and / or not white evaluated “sidewalk maintenance” as “excellent” or “good” --81% of respondents overall evaluated “value of services for taxes paid” as “excellent” or “good” and only 66% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and / or not white evaluated “value of services for taxes paid” as “excellent” or “good.” Describe how this change impacts racial equity? Data can be used to benchmark progress towards race equity goals What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? City fails to recognize that race can determine how well the city is serving its residents Is this a long-term project? no Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? ? Working Group Comments: The working group has questions about whether the current Quality of Life survey vendor is comfortable discussing issues of race and equity. Task Force Comments: I-8 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendation Submitted by: K. Bass Recommendation: Using best available data, disaggregate maps of resident population by race. Apply race equity criteria for allocating funds through city budgeting process for Capital Improvement Projects, Pedestrian and Cycling Safety (PACS) Fund and Operating Budget. Data Supporting Recommendation In 2011, Bloomington Public Health completed an environmental scan, inventory and focus groups of residents of the Parklawn neighborhood in Edina to assess barriers to physical activity and access to nutritious foods. This area is racially and ethnically diverse (36.7% in the 240.03 Census Tract) and lower income (18% lives under 200% of the Federal Poverty level) compared to other parts of the City. The assessment found that the area, home to many families and children, is bounded by busy streets with few sidewalks and trails. Further, there are no amenities in the neighborhood park. This finding, “Lake Edina Park, near the Fred Richards Golf Course, is an open space that many of the children, parents, school staff, program directors and apartment complex managers mentioned as a desirable location for a park with amenities.” In 2012-13, community organizers from the do.town project, funded by Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota, again worked with Parklawn neighbors to advocate for a play structure or other amenities in Lake Edina Park. Funding for the planning of a play structure was proposed in the 2013 Capital Improvement Plan budget. As of 2018, however, children in the Parklawn neighborhood still lack a play structure in their neighborhood park while upgrades and investments in park facilities have been made across the city in the intervening years. From the City Quality of Life Survey, 79% of white residents evaluated sidewalk maintenance as “excellent” or “good” compared to 62% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and/or not white. This is a statistically significant difference. 83% of respondents overall evaluated “value of services for taxes paid” as “excellent” or “good” and only 66% of respondents who identified as Hispanic and/or not white agreed. Again, a statistically significant difference. http://voicesforracialjustice.org/from-colorblind-to-race-conscious-two-very-different-sets-of-metrics/ Criteria checklist: Does the city have decision-making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Different criteria will need to be developed and applied to develop budgets Describe how this change impacts racial equity Distribution of public dollars in a race conscious way acknowledges the disparities in living conditions and takes into disinvestment in neighborhoods of color over generations What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? We perpetuate the idea that the distribution of public resources and public policy has been “colorblind.” A colorblind framework pretends as if race has not been a determining factor when making investments and setting public policy. A colorblind approach does not see the dramatic disparities in living conditions between white, affluent residents and communities of color and low wealth European Americans. Is this a long-term project? No Working Group Comments: The Edina Transportation Commission has done some work already to develop equity based criteria for the PACS fund. An example is attached to this recommendation. Task Force Comments: PROPOSED Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS) Fund Equity Scoring Criteria BACKGROUND In the November 2016 ETC packet, staff proposed a set of projects for the PACS Fund. An excerpt from the staff cover letter discuss the current criteria: “In recommending sidewalk construction projects, staff considers a number of criteria. Several factors can affect if and how each criterion is applied and the relative weight given to each. Often, opportunities such as planned road construction projects and outside funding present themselves, and the sometimes fluid nature of these opportunities can affect if and when sidewalk projects are recommended and constructed. Below are some of the key criteria staff considers, generally listed in descending order of relative weight. • Part of neighborhood street reconstruction project (up to 50 percent cost savings) • Part of state-aid reconstruction project (state-aid funds pay up to 80 percent of construction) • Active Routes to School Sidewalk (recommended in the ARTS Plan) • Included in the Comprehensive Plan (on the sidewalk facilities map) • Estimated cost of project relative to remaining PACS Fund budget • Additional funding/grant opportunities • Surveys and/or design documents completed • Petition for a sidewalk submitted by residents” Nearly all criteria focus on cost. There is an assumption inherent in current budgeting that all residents and all neighborhoods have the same relationship to public dollars. An equity lens says that we make decisions about the distribution of resources based on need and equal outcomes. RECOMMENDATION In selecting projects to be funded by the PACS fund, the ETC recommends a set of equity-based criteria for prioritizing capital investment in pedestrian and bicycling facilities. This effort is meant to quantifiably evaluate neighborhoods, and ensure that investments are equitably targeted and support [Policy Basis – community vision, comprehensive plan, policy goals]. The criteria are a combination of community, neighborhood, infrastructure and cost characteristics using multiple data sources. Infrastructure projects that rank high are prioritized for investment. Questions to consider: Are there criteria missing? What points should be assigned? (This conveys community values) What data sources should be referenced? Community Characteristics•Concentration of race/ethnicity other than white•Density of transit riders in the neighborhood•Population density in the neighborhood•Youth density of the neighborhood Neighborhood Characteristics•Proportionality of investment•Active Routes to School Sidewalk•Proximity to other facilities (park, commercial, etc.)•Resident petition•Neighborhood safety (history of crashes or crime) Cost Characteristics•Asset lifespan•Asset condition•Part of neighborhood reconstruction project•Part of state-aid reconstruction project•Estimated cost of project relative to remaining PACS Fund budget•Additional funding/grant opportunities•Surveys and/or design documents completed PACS Fund Capital Project Selection Community Characteristics 1. Neighborhood concentration of race/ethnicity other than white 2. Density of transit riders in the neighborhood 3. Population density in the neighborhood where the facility is proposed (2 possible points). The more densely populated neighborhoods will be a higher priority. This metric takes into account extra wear and tear on infrastructure in high density areas and the proportional value of public investment dollars per person in those areas. 4. Youth density of the neighborhood where the park is located (3 possible points). The higher the youth density of the neighborhood, the higher it is scored and it is moved up the list for priority. Same logic as the above metric applies with an extra focus on the needs of families and the needs of children who are dependent on sidewalk and bicycle facilities for independent mobility. Neighborhood Characteristics 1. Proportionality of investment (3 possible points if no other facility was constructed in this quadrant in the last year). Referring to the amount of capital invested in each quadrant. 2. Neighborhood safety – history of crashes or crime (2 possible points). Neighborhood crime statistics are looked at to determine need, with more crashes or crime in an area resulting in a higher score and increased priority for capital investment. This is a public health and racial equity approach to crash and crime reduction, grounded in the understanding that these are outcomes of disinvestment. 3. Active Routes to School Sidewalk 4. Indicated in the Comprehensive Plan (Sidewalk Facilities Map or Master Bicycle Plan) 5. Resident petition – petition for sidewalk submitted by residents Cost Characteristics 6. Asset lifespan (3 possible points). Facilities are evaluated and higher points are given to infrastructure more than five years past its lifespan. 7. Asset condition (5 possible points). Assets in worse condition receive higher priority for rehab. 8. Part of neighborhood reconstruction project 9. Part of state-aid reconstruction project 10. Estimated cost of project relative to remaining PACS Fund budget 11. Additional funding/grant opportunities 12. Surveys and/or design documents completed I-9 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendations Submitted By: P. Arsenault, K. Bass, K. Curtin Recommendation: Review Police Department policy for posting individual names on the department website’s “Crimes Report”; revise to balance public safety with protection of due process through a racial equity lens. Data Supporting Recommendation: It is likely that the department data follows national trends where people of color are disproportionately arrested by police. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/07/data-police-racial-bias Thus, the publication of individuals’ names are likely to disproportionately impact people of color who live and visit the city. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? See Above How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? EPD process for posting individual’s names with Crime Report may change Describe how this change impacts racial equity? This will help the Department build a culture of trust and respect with the community What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Bringing public shame on community members without due process; violating privacy of individuals who may never be convicted of a crime; may have long-lasting effect such as impeding individuals from gaining employment Is this a long-term project? Yes Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes Working Group Comments: Including the names of individuals in online arrest reports can bring public judgment and scrutiny, before due process and may bring shame and have long lasting effects on individuals who may never be convicted of a crime. It is likely that this practice has a disproportionate impact on people of color who live in and visit Edina. The EPD posting policy should weigh the impact on an individual’s due process and risk to community trust with the benefit to public safety and transparency. Could arrest type and location be posted without naming individuals? Could individual names be posted and removed in 7 days? Task Force Comments: I-10 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendations Submitted By: K. Puram, R. Cooper, T. Fox Recommendation: PD Data Collection and Management Require Data Collection to provide the ability to make informed policy and procedure adjustments. a. Collect data regularly on community attitudes and perceptions about local law enforcement through an anonymous survey, including race data. b. Collect and analyze demographic data, including but not limited to race, on all stops (with outcome, by race), searches and seizures (all detentions) in accordance with 21st Century Policing’s best practices c. Collect data about non-criminal tickets to create transparency. d. Analyze the data on a regular basis and share the information with the public. Put actions in place when adjustments to policy or practices are needed. Data Supporting Recommendation: 1. Based on feedback from community survey, there is a perception of racial bias in traffic stops and other interactions with the police. Here are some examples of the survey responses: a) One of my biggest observations is how many people of color are pulled over by police officers in the City. In a two week period of time I saw five African-American people pulled over and in that same period of time I saw no white people pulled over. b) Various experiences of police officers using condescending approaches and micro aggressions towards people of color. c) Neighbors call police for suspicious behavior of people of color in their neighborhoods. d) A person of color in the community gets pulled over by police frequently. e) As a person of color, a community member is always concerned about being pulled over. 2. When a racial incident happens, there is no data to confirm or to deny that these incidents are happening in isolation, or if there is a pattern. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? See Above How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Based on data collected, there may be a need for changes in all three. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? If the data shows a pattern of racial bias, policy and procedural changes will bring about racial equity. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Lack of trust between the community and police. Is this a long-term project? Yes Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Once data is collected, an independent body must analyze the data and provide recommendations based on the outcome. This may require additional resources. City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Services Submitted By: S. Allison S-1 Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? None. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? We see this as a starting point to review all city policies for Plain language purposes. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? Plain language will help everyone but especially people of Color for whom English is a 2nd language. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? An individual who struggles with English will have difficulty understanding the process for requesting data and may not complete forms correctly, or may simply give up requesting the data. Is this a long-term project? No Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Not necessarily. There is a Records Management Committee that could add this to their agenda. Working Group Comments: Task Force Comments: Recommendation: Step One: Review Record Management - Data Practices Policy (Data Request) and rewrite this using Obama’s Plain Language Initiative Hemingway Application. Step Two: Have the city review all policies for plain language; all new policies should go through a plain language review. Data Supporting Recommendation: In a bubble chart survey conducted by the group, Record Management rose to the top as an area for the group to examine. Daily filing and maintenance of City records do not appear to be an area that would negatively impact people of color. Data Practices Policy (part of Record Management) that explains how to make a Data Request to the City, is difficult to read. It is a “Legalese” style of writing which is necessary to some degree because it is governed by State Statute; however, it could be Written in plain language. This is an area that could impact people of color. S-2 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Services . Submitted By:_E. Allenberg, B. Hubbard, D. Nye____ Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Communities traditionally want a high level of transparency And community engagement with law enforcement. This increases community trust and legitimacy. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? See Above. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? See Above. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Specific communities (communities of color) feeling disengaged and distrustful. Is this a long-term project? Yes – Short-Term & Long-Term Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes, this requires more assessment. Depending on the outcome of the analysis, additional resources may be needed to facilitate these recommendations. Working Group Comments: Community engagement is key to police accountability, police legitimacy, positive community relationships and crime fighting. The Work Group is hopeful more positive marketing and public relations and giving officers more opportunities to interact with the Edina community will serve these purposes. The Work Group’s recommendations are rooted in the following: Recommendation 1 : Specific sections of the manual include sensitive tactical and operational information that should not Recommendation: Police Community Engagement 1. Place the Department Policy Manual on the Department website for public viewing. 2. Develop a strategy to improve Police Department communications. The Work Group feels the department needs to develop an ongoing strategy to publicize and promote the Police Department, including but not limited to the increased aggressive use of social media. 3. Evaluate and improve the Department’s current community outreach programs. Review current outreach (community involvement) programs, evaluate the efficacy of each of those programs, prioritize department focus to ensure participation of people of color, and introduce new ones as needed. 4. Build trust between Police and Community. Create Resident Oversight Board to review complaints of police misconduct. Data Supporting Recommendation: *2017 Race & Equity Community Survey information -Some respondents mentioned that some people of color do not feel welcome in situations that involve Edina police officers. *”President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing” (2015) S-2 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Services . Submitted By:_E. Allenberg, B. Hubbard, D. Nye____ be generally distributed. Placing other non-sensitive policies on the website provides a simple, but meaningful, exercise that shows the community the department is completely transparent about their policies related to officer conduct and performance. It also creates ease for the department and city if someone is looking for a policy. Optimally the manual would be available in multiple languages. Recommendation 2: Developing a positive message for the police department not only will increase the accountability, transparency and great goodwill, but this goodwill allows the police department to fight crime more effectively through partnership with the community. The Work Group feels it is key for this marketing strategy to acknowledge the different segments and demographics within the Edina community and tailor both outreach and messages for such communities. The Work Group is concerned the current marketing capability is inadequate from a focus perspective for the unique needs of the police department in its important work of connecting with the community. The Work Group also feel this messaging must include interaction with someone who has expertise in policing in general and community policing. Recommendation 3: The Work Group feels the department could see significant benefit from a strategic, well-executed and consistent community outreach program. The Work Group understands there are many ways the department already engages the community and those efforts are appreciated, but feels these measures could be greatly increased. The Work Group feels a strategy and format should be developed for regular forums, meetings, and other types of public engagement throughout the community. Through this engagement, community members and residents can positively interact with law enforcement, assist in the identification of problem areas and solutions, and influence department programs, services, and policies. The Work Group also feels there is a need to identify communities that are traditionally underserved by current programs and develop outreach programs for these communities. Task Force Comments: S-3 City of Edina Race and Equity Services Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Services . Submitted By:_E. Allenberg, B. Hubbard, D. Nye____ Recommendation: Police Department Policies 1: Analyze policies related to external and independent criminal investigations and prosecutions for Officer Involved Shootings and In-Custody death incidents. (Policies 500.00 – Authorized Use of Force, 520.00 – Deadly Force, 530.00 – Discharge of Firearms, 720.00 – City Jail: Booking Intake Release). 2: Evaluate the Department Policy Manual through a race and equity lens, related to Use of Force, specifically focusing on training, investigations, prosecution, data collection and information. (Policies 500.00 – Authorized Use of Force, 510.00 – Use of Non-Lethal Force, 520.00 – Deadly Force, 530.00 – Discharge of Firearms). 3: Review and consider adding a provision to current policy requiring officers to identify to individuals stopped or detained as soon as practical and reasonable the following: 1. The reason for their stop, and 2. The reason a search is being conducted, if applicable. (Policies 320.00 – Conduct of Department Members, 605.00 – Persons Detained or In-Custody). 4: Review the department’s Policy 690.00 – Impartial Policing. Ensure that this policy meets the stated goal of “reaffirming the Department’s commitment to impartial/unbiased policing and to reinforce procedures that serve to assure the public that the Department is providing service and enforcing laws in a fair and equitable manner to all.” Data Supporting Recommendation: *2017 Race & Equity Community Survey information -Some respondents mentioned a perception that people of color are stopped and/or arrested more often by Edina Police. -Some respondents mentioned that some people of color do not feel welcome in situations that involve Edina police officers. *”President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing” (2015) Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? See Above. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? After adequate review, these changes would have direct impact on Police Department policies. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? If it is determined that any current policies would have a disparaging effect on communities of color, changes to these policies would have a significant impact for racial equity. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? If policies are not equitable, communities of color could be significantly impacted by Police Department policies. Is this a long-term project? Yes – Short-term and Long-term Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? The listed policies should be assessed however, this should not require significant additional resources to complete. S-3 City of Edina Race and Equity Services Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Services . Submitted By:_E. Allenberg, B. Hubbard, D. Nye____ Working Group Comments: The department has a very thorough and comprehensive policy manual. When reviewing the manual through the lens of equity and community policing opportunities, the Work Group identified key areas where the department could review policies for possible improvements and to ensure the current policies encourage inclusiveness for all. Recommendation 1 - External and independent criminal investigations of these incidents is current department practice. However, a review of these policies would be beneficial to ensure transparency. Recommendation 2 – The Work Group felt that all police departments should periodically review their use of force policies and it would be a good time to make sure the Edina Police Department’s Use of Force policy has been reviewed. Recommendation 3 - Although this is current practice, the Work Group felt requiring this information would provide for transparency and would also serve to protect both the citizens of Edina and arresting officers if there were discrepancies about stop/arrest reasons. Task Force Comments: S-4 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Services Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Services . Submitted By:_E. Allenberg, B. Hubbard, D. Nye____ Recommendation: Police Department Training Recommendation Research and implement successful models for training in the areas of implicit bias, cultural diversity, police legitimacy, and procedural justice. The work could potentially coincide, at least in part, with the GARE/Race and Equity Task Force work currently underway. Data Supporting Recommendation: *2017 Race & Equity Community Survey information - some respondents mentioned that some people of color do not feel welcome in situations that involve Edina police officers. *”President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing” (2015) *Review best practices from the cities, including cities of Seattle and St. Paul. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? See Above. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? Ensuring that all police officers are properly trained will ensure that all processes and procedures are being correctly implemented. Describe how this change impacts racial equity? Ensuring that all police officers are properly trained will ensure that all people of all races are treated equitably. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? Incidents of police officer implicit bias and a lack of police legitimacy in the eyes of some, or more, members of the community. Is this a long-term project? Yes – Short-Term and Long-Term Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? The Police Department currently puts resources towards successful officer training. Any changes in this area may require additional resources to properly facilitate. Working Group Comments: The Department currently takes great pride in having robust and varied opportunities for officers to be well-trained in various aspects of law enforcement. This time and commitment is very valued by the Department, but the Working Group feels it is very important to ensure that there is specific training offered on various subjects dealing with race and equity. This view is rooted in a feeling that the city or Department only get better with more knowledge. The Working Group suggests any training recommendations are done jointly between department and non-police personnel with recognition that neither entity controls this issue completely. S-4 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Services Working Group Recommendation Working Group: Services . Submitted By:_E. Allenberg, B. Hubbard, D. Nye____ Task Force Comments: S-5, S-6, S-7, S-8, S-9 S-5 Parks and Recreation Recommendation One: Parks and recreation programs should start collecting demographic data about program utilization to ensure their programs are being utilized across all Edina residents. Data Supporting Recommendation: There is currently no data tracking to know if our parks and rec programs utilization and participation are representative of Edina city demographics. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Many community members of color during the community conversations mention not feeling comfortable at various youth sports programs and recreation programs in Edina. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? It will depend on the data that is tracked. It could potentially change park and recreation offerings and communications of offerings, but it would depend on analysis of data. Describe how this change impact racial equality? This is merely the first step in understanding in our park and recreation utilization and making sure it is responsive to all community members. What are the unintended consequences of existing practices? Certain Edina community members feeling unwelcome at parks and recreation programs, having parks and recreation programs that are not of interest to certain community members, certain programs being cost- prohibitive. Is this a long term-project? Short and long term. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes, this is purely an assessment request. Additional resources are required from the perspective of setting up accurate data collection processes and back end data analysis. Working Group Comments: Task Force Comments: S-6 Parks and Recreation Recommendation Two: City staff currently oversee certain city associations and city associations utilize city parks and recreation facilities in partnership with the city (Braemar Ice Arena, domed facility, fields, etc…), but do not have any enforcement power or mechanism in place currently to assure that associations are operating in accordance with the city's expectation regarding race equity and inclusion. The city also contracts with outside vendors for parks and recreation programs and needs to establish expectations that all outside vendors will adhere to and established process and procedure for dealing with race based issues and discriminatory practices. Data Supporting Recommendation: Anecdotal feedback from community surveys: community members of color during the community conversations mention not feeling comfortable at various youth sports programs and recreation programs in Edina. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Maybe Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Many community members of color during the community conversations mention not feeling comfortable at various youth sports programs and recreation programs in Edina. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? It would require a process to be established between the city and sports associations if there are issues involving race based discrimination or equity issues. Describe how this change impact racial equality? It would allow for an established process to ensure the city has established oversight over the associations under its purview and that utilize its facilities. It would give show Edina residents the city is serious about taking racial discrimination complaints seriously by offering a transparent process. What are the unintended consequences of existing practices? That there is no oversight and racial biased events could happen without consequence. Is this a long term-project? Mid to long term. Goal is to improve oversight of internal associations programs and outside vendors management to assure that all activities meet or exceed city goals for race, equity and inclusion. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? The city would need to assess the existing relationship with city associations, where they have existing relationships and oversight and where they don’t and if there are opportunities to establish processes. The city needs to review and understand how their partnerships with city associations in utilization of city facilities give them an opportunity to establish oversite in this area. Working Group Comments: Task Force Comments: S-7 Parks and Recreation Recommendation Three: Improve marketing and communication about parks and recreation programs to different audiences/demographics within Edina (also see marketing recommendations). Intentionally target underrepresented groups. Are current communications effective for underrepresented populations: Channel? Need translation services? This recommendation includes reviewing the parks and rec webpage to ensure it is user-friendly for all audiences. Data Supporting Recommendation: See data recommendation #1 and marketing data collection recommendation #1. There is little data collected other than anecdotal data Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Many community members of color during the community conversations mention not feeling comfortable at various youth sports programs and recreation programs in Edina. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? This does not require a change in policy, but potentially a change in marketing and communication practices to identify segments within the community and market/communicate to them based on how they are receptive to communication. Describe how this change impact racial equality? It could potentially have a very positive impact if community members that are underrepresented in programs feel like they are being more welcomed into the programs and are better educated on what programs exist in the city. The first step is to better understand what barriers there are to utilization of programs and what communication barriers exist. What are the unintended consequences of existing practices? Under-representation of persons of color in parks and recreation programs, feelings of not belonging. Is this a long term-project? Short and long term. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes, this would be a two step process in conjunction with our marketing and communications recommendation. One, to better assess and understand how we can communicate better with underrepresented populations and then to change communications practices accordingly. Working Group Comments: S-8 Parks and Recreation Recommendation Four: Review price points of park and recreational programs, determine if this is a barrier to utilization and if so, come up with programs to reduce this barrier. Data Supporting Recommendation: See data recommendation #1. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Many community members of color during the community conversations mention not feeling comfortable at various youth sports programs and recreation programs in Edina. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? It could potentially impact pricing structure or the city can look into actively partnering with programs like Edina Give and Go. Highlighting how to give access to programs instead of pricing feeling like a barrier to entry. Describe how this change impact racial equality? In Edina people of color have a higher rate of poverty than the rest of the population. Pricing structures can greatly impact the ability to utilize programs and the city need to review these structures to ensure that all citizens can access our programs. What are the unintended consequences of existing practices? Under-representation of persons of color in parks and recreation programs, feelings of not belonging. Is this a long term-project? Short and long term. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes, this would be a two step process. One, to better assess if pricing is a barrier to utilization of parks and recreation programs and then how does the city affect change accordingly. Working Group Comments: Task Force Comments: S-9 Parks and Recreation Recommendation Five: Recognize the evolving demographics of our community and develop new programming to meet the needs of all community members. Develop new programming for underrepresented community members. Data Supporting Recommendation: See data recommendation #1. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Many community members of color during the community conversations mention not feeling comfortable at various youth sports programs and recreation programs in Edina. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? It could potentially impact pricing structure or the city can look into actively partnering with programs like Edina Give and Go. Highlighting how to give access to programs instead of pricing feeling like a barrier to entry. Describe how this change impact racial equality? In Edina people of color have a higher rate of poverty than the rest of the population. Pricing structures can greatly impact the ability to utilize programs and the city need to review these structures to ensure that all citizens can access our programs. What are the unintended consequences of existing practices? Under-representation of persons of color in parks and recreation programs, feelings of not belonging. Is this a long term-project? Short and long term. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes, this would be a two step process. One, to better assess if pricing is a barrier to utilization of parks and recreation programs and then how does the city affect change accordingly. Working Group Comments: Task Force Comments: S-10 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Services Group - Marketing and Communications Recommendations Submitted by Chris Smith Recommendation One: Collect data to determine if media is reaching and whether message pertains to POC in Edina. We feel this is an area the city needs more surveying and a media assessment to understand who reads specific publications/channels and if city publications are not reaching/resonating with POC, this can be a barrier to feeling welcome in the city and to accessing programs and institutions. Data Supporting Recommendation: There is currently no data tracking to know if the current marketing and communications from the city effectively communication with all demographics within the city. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Many persons of color report not feeling welcome at many places within the city, nor do they utilize programs within the city. While working on the institutions and services themselves is important, how we message and communicate to persons of color is also an important aspect of city services. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? It will depend on the data that is tracked. It could potentially change city communication processes. Describe how this change impact racial equality? Proactive inclusion. What are the unintended consequences of existing practices? Continued perception that POC are not supported or encouraged by the community. Is this a long term-project? Continuous. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Yes, this is purely an assessment request. Additional resources are required from the perspective of setting up accurate data collection processes and back end data analysis. Working Group Comments: Part of the recommendation of the initiative should be marketing so that the whole community understands the goal of inclusivity. Would be nice for the city to host community cultural events and market them via city communications; spotlight minority owned businesses in city publications, etc… Task Force Comments: S-11 Recommendation Two: Create a holistic communications strategy with a racial equity lens in mind. 1. Make sure all demographics within the city are communicate to via appropriate channels and messaging. Review if translation services are needed. 2. Share best practices within other city departments to determine overall best practices from a communications perspective. 3. Find new ways to communicate with POC in our community. 4. Highlight POC, cultural events and more in city publications = are our publications truly a reflection of the demographics of our city? Data Supporting Recommendation: There is currently no data tracking to know if the current marketing and communications from the city effectively communication with all demographics within the city. But many persons of color report not feeling welcome at many places within the city, nor do they utilize programs within the city. There could be a correlation between these two things. Criteria Checklist: Does the City have decision making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? Many persons of color report not feeling welcome at many places within the city, nor do they utilize programs within the city. While working on the institutions and services themselves is important, how we message and communicate to persons of color is also an important aspect of city services. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? It will change how we communicate to being more inclusive and strategic. Describe how this change impact racial equality? Proactive inclusion. What are the unintended consequences of existing practices? Continued perception that POC are not supported or encouraged by the community. Is this a long term-project? Continuous. Is this an area of the City government that needs more assessment and if so, what additional resources will be required? Potentially more communications/marketing resources; this will require a more strategic approach to communication, potentially creating new channels for communication, translation services, reviewing current best practices, etc... Working Group Comments: Part of the recommendation of the initiative should be marketing so that the whole community understands the goal of inclusivity. Would be nice for the city to host community cultural events and market them via city communications; spotlight minority owned businesses in city publications, etc… Task Force Comments: TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION: City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Submitted by: Task Force TF – 1 Recommendation: Racial Equity Accountability Measures 1. Hire or identify a Race Equity manager/director, whose accountabilities include oversight of the Racial Equity Implementation Plan, monitoring, assessing and evaluating progress toward goals. This person should be part of the City’s Leadership Team. 2. Create an ordinance that staff shall provide an annual report to Council and the public on progress toward established racial equity goals. Provide quarterly/interim progress reports to the City Manager and HRRC. Reporting can be provided to other Boards and Commissions on elements of the plan within their scope of work at least annually. 3. Include execution of race equity implementation plan as a formal annual performance goal for all City Executive Leadership. 4. Include the implementation of recommendations on each department’s workplan on an annual basis. 5. Develop communications plan, including an asset-based narrative about the focus of this work that reflects community voice. 6. Keep the Race Equity Task Force in place through the development of the operational plan to provide a community feedback loop. Staff could utilize the task force and working groups to answer questions and offer feedback, May – August 2018. RETF would also review implementation report and offer community comment (similar to an Advisory Communication) on the implementation report in Oct. 2018. Data Supporting Recommendation The comparison city of Bellevue, WA, “Diversity Advantage Initiative” provided 60 recommendations for the City and the community to fulfill. It includes a robust staffing model, stated commitments, website presence including regular progress updates to the public, guiding principles and other elements. The comparison city of Appleton, WI, has a full-time Diversity and Inclusion coordinator in the Mayor’s Office. https://www.appleton.org/government/mayor-s-office/diversity-inclusion Criteria checklist: Does the city have decision-making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? The task force and working groups want to ensure that there are a comprehensive set of accountability measures to ensure implementation of the recommendations. How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? This recommendation works to integrate and embed racial equity into decision-making structures of the city and creates the infrastructure, staffing and support to ensure the effort is broad and sustained. Describe how this change impacts racial equity This recommendation is about integrating racial equity across work streams, departments and leadership accountabilities. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? If these accountability mechanisms are not enacted, we risk making little progress on the recommendations. Is this a long-term project? No Working Group Comments: Task Force Comments: This is one of the most important recommendations to implement early, as it sets the framework for decision-making chains and direction for leadership and staff. TF-2 City of Edina Race and Equity Initiative Working Group: Institutions Working Group Recommendation Submitted by: K. Bass Recommendation: Attribution for historically significant contribution of Yancey Family to Edina’s history Name a public facility in the Grandview area, if not Edina City Hall, after BC and Ellen Yancey. Data Supporting Recommendation Beverly Claiborne (BC) Yancey was a Union soldier in the Civil War, a farmer, a founding member of the local Grange and the recorder for the 1888 vote that created the Village of Edina. In fact, the decision to name the city “Edina” was not without controversy. Yancey appeared to have served something of a peacemaker and mediator role in the debate. "Meeting was somewhat boisterous for a few minutes until, through the efforts of Mr. Yancy, order was restored. “ https://edinamn.gov/1016/Edinas-Name The whole family played a prominent role in Edina’s early days. BC served on the Village Council. The Yancey berry and potato farm was located at present day Hwy 100 and Eden Ave, where city hall now sits. His wife, Ellen Maria Bruce Yancey, founded the first PTA in Edina. BC is described as “industrious” with an interest in self-improvement. He was trusted, serving as a “gatekeeper” of the Grange, which at the time operated as a “secret society.” The Yanceys were one of at least 17 Black families that lived in Edina between the Civil War and the 1930s. The reasons for the families’ departure from the city in the early part of the 20th century has been a subject of study and speculation, but may be linked to the racial covenants introduced during the development the Country Club neighborhood in the 1920s and increasing white racial animus of post-Civil War Reconstruction. http://www.startribune.com/edina-s-historical-mystery-black-flight/184985461/ https://hennepinhistorymuseumblog.wordpress.com/2017/03/06/maggie-yanceys-1881-geology-book/ http://yanceyfamilygenealogy.org/edina.htm Criteria checklist: Does the city have decision-making authority? Yes Is the activity in the scope defined by the City and the Task Force? Yes What is the community feedback about this recommendation? According to the 1-1-13 Star Tribune article, “With city redevelopment plans for the nearby Grandview area advancing, some residents have suggested that the Yancey name should be used somewhere to salute the prominent role the family played in Edina's early days.” How will the recommendation impact system changes for policies, processes and procedures in the City? It will not. This is largely symbolic. Describe how this change impacts racial equity The acknowledgement of the important contributions of a Black family in the very establishment of the City would signal inclusion and belonging of residents of color. What are the unintended outcomes of existing practices? The omission of the Yanceys from public discourse and spaces has hidden the contribution of Black families to the early years of the Village, while many white City leaders are acknowledged in street names, public parks and on the walls of City Hall. This erasure serves to perpetuate the idea that Edina “has always” been a white enclave. That is not the case. Is this a long-term project? No Working Group Comments: BC and Ellen Yancey were a founding family of Edina, have been deceased for 100+ years and influenced Edina’s history. Task Force Comments: Appendix A City Government Structure and Departments Functions Appendix B Police Report for October 14th, 2016 Incident Full Report: Click Here Appendix C Facilitator RFP RFP PROCESS TIMELINE Proposal Submittal Deadline: April 14, 2017 Interviews for Selected Deadline Consultants: Week of April 24, 2017 City Council Approval of Consultant Contract: May 2, 2017 LIMITATION The Request for Proposal does not commit the City of Edina (City) to award a contract or pay any cost incurred in the preparation of the proposal. The City reserves the right to reject any of all proposals or portions thereof, to accept a proposal or portion thereof, and to waive any informality. QUESTIONS All questions regarding this request for proposal should be directed to Project Coordinator, MJ Lamon by April 5. MJ Lamon Project Coordinator mlamon@edinamn.go v 952.826.0360 CONTENTS RFP Process ....................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Organization Background ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Deliverables ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Submission Contents ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 Evaluation Criteria and Procedures .......................................................................................................................... 8 City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal PROJECT INTRODUCTION SITUATION The City of Edina wants to be known as a welcoming community that values the diverse communal contributions and quality of life for all residents, employees, and visitors within our community. Incidents within our community have created an opportunity to look at policy and procedures that have in the past and could in the future provide unequal treatment of our community members. Our goal is to take a proactive approach to identify, repair and prevent future disparate outcomes within our community through city policies and procedures. Trust by all our community members that our policies and operating practices are equitable to our diverse community’s needs will improve the quality of life for our community members and provide a trusting environment to live, work and play. The City of Edina is seeking a firm or team to facilitate a community task force and working groups to accomplish the following objectives. PROJECT OBJECTIVES � Identify race-based disparities in Edina’s city government facilities, services, and institutions. � Propose remedies and solutions to the city government policies and operating practices that are creating the disparities. WORK FLOW The firm or team will work directly with the Race and Equity Task Force and report to the City Manager. TASK FORCE The City of Edina has convened an Ad Hoc Task Force to ultimately make a recommendation on policies, practices and strategies for the City of Edina to address, identify and eliminate disparities. WORKING GROUPS (WG) The City also created civilian working groups who will focus on one of the three following areas: Facilities, Services, and Institutions. The working groups will advise and report to the Race and Equity Task Force. City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal GOVERNMENT ALLIANCE ON RACE AND EQUITY (GARE) TEAM GARE is a national network of governments working to achieve racial equity and advance opportunities for all. Across the country, governmental jurisdictions are: making a commitment to achieve racial equity; focusing on the power and influence of their own institutions; and working in partnership with others. When this occurs, significant leverage and expansion opportunities emerge, setting the stage for the achievement of racial equity in our communities. Edina has nine representatives in the 2017 GARE Minnesota cohort comprised of City staff, an elected official, and Human Rights and Relation Commissioners. These representatives are also involved in the Task Force and Working Groups and will bring their learnings to help those groups achieve optimal outcomes. ORGANIZATION BACKGROUND The City of Edina is home to more than 50,000 residents. It is a first-ring suburb located in Hennepin County and bisected by major highways, making it highly accessible to all within the metro area. From its incorporation in 1888 as a milling area on the banks of Minnehaha Creek, Edina has evolved to be a model among municipalities in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The City offers high quality single and multifamily housing along with successful commercial and retail centers in Southdale and its thriving downtown area at 50th and France, among others. The City of Edina employs over 250 people and more than 300 seasonal workers, many of whom serve at its seven enterprise facilities. Three school districts serve Edina families: Edina, Richfield, and Hopkins. The City of Edina is known for excellent city services and sound fiscal management. VISION EDINA The City completed a visioning process in 2015. Vision Edina is a long-term strategic framework that informs the community and our decision-making to remain a relevant, competitive, resilient and progressive city. Five feature areas emerged through the Vision Edina process and now define the future of the community. 1) Inclusive and Connected 2) Built-To-Scale Development 3) Sustainable Environment 4) Community of Learning 5) Future-Orientated “Edina holds a well-earned reputation as a city of choice. It is the model of a successful, mature, and progressive urban community, that strives to lead in a modern and evolving world. We maintain our heritage and attractiveness, and afford our residents the highest quality of life, while actively embracing the future.” City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal EDINA’S MISSION “Our mission is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” DEMOGRAPHICS � � � Population = 50,138 45 Neighborhoods Ownership Rate = 73.5% � � � Population under age 18 = 18.2% Population over age 65 = 20.3% Median Age = 44.7 years of age � Median Home Value = $466,500 � 16 Square Miles � 208 miles of city streets � 77 miles of sidewalks � 43 Parks and open spaces � 285 FT City employees � 15 City Facilities � 300-700 PT and seasonal City employees SCOPE OF WORK The consultant will take a lead role in all public forums, workshops, meetings, and hearings. City staff shall be available to the consultant in a supporting role, consisting of scheduling and meeting arrangements for meetings, during this period. The consultant will work closely with the appointed Task Force and report to the City Manager. PURPOSE The purpose of this initiative has not been designed to investigate and remedy any specific city government employee group, department, function, activity or program. It has been designed to examine our entire array of policies and operations. The project is limited to the policies and operations that are under the control of the Edina city government and its elected leaders so that Edina city government could, at Council discretion, modify the project to achieve the desired outcomes. METHODOLOGY The suggested methodology for the process is “Assess-Plan-Act-Evaluate”, or APAE. The consultant should use this methodology when presenting their proposal. City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal Phase 1 - Assess – This is the discovery stage where more questions are asked than answered. For example, what are examples of racial disparities in city services? Or, is there evidence that institutional bias is repressing people of color from participating on City boards and commissions? At the end of this stage, we have narrowed our planning focus and identified priorities and opportunities. This phase of the process is characterized by inquiry processes such as public meetings, community conversations, web-based forums, personal testimony, etc. Phase 2 - Plan – During the planning stage, the task force and working groups are researching and proposing potential solutions to the problems and opportunities identified during the Assess stage of the process. At the end of this stage, the task force will present its prioritized list of important actions, accompanied by a timeline and a description of desired outcomes and results. Phase 3 - Act – The Act stage begins to shift the process from the task force to City Council and staff. Task force members and working groups remain engaged during the Act stage to assist in supporting the plans and recommendations, and to serve as an agent of accountability. Phase 4 - Evaluate – The final stage of the APAE process is evaluation. The evaluation stage makes heavy use of the task force to measure and report the outcomes and results of the City’s planning and acting efforts. The task force reports its findings directly to the City Council. The consultant will support the Task Force to identify outcomes and measures that can be tracked over time as part of ongoing continuous improvement and accountability. If necessary, the Evaluate stage of the process can lead directly into a new round of APAE process with a new Assess stage. EXPECTATIONS The City expects the facilitator to demonstrate their comfort and experience holding and applying a racial equity lens while completing the following tasks. Analyze the current state of Edina’s facilities, services, and institutions � Assist with inventory procurement process. � Initial meeting with City staff and Task Force to review the project scope, work program, overall schedule, and to set dates for significant public meetings/workshops. � Obtain and review existing documents relevant to the project. Facilitate the community engagement efforts � Create and lead a public engagement process to obtain input, guidance, and opinions on the areas of potential change, and build consensus on the future of these areas of change and develop goals for future programs. � Develop innovative ways to engage the community. � Develop partnerships with community organizations. City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal Develop proposals and ideas based on the input received for the task force to review � Conduct weekly review meetings and/or phone conferences with City staff to discuss project progress. � Conduct meetings with key elected and appointed officials. � Make periodic presentations to the Human Rights and Relations Commission and to City Council to update them on project progress. Some of these sessions may be joint meetings. � Conduct monthly review meetings with the Task Force to discuss project progress. Assist the Task Force with creating a recommendation to Council � Develop goals and objectives. � Create presentations and reports to support the recommendations. � Assist the Task Force in understanding community input and developing recommendations. Provide an implementation plan around the recommendations � Develop implementation strategies PROPOSED TIMELINE May 2, 2017 City Council approves facilitator contract May 2, 2017 Task force, WG begin formal meetings; Phase 1 begins June 16, 2017 Phase 1 ends; report prepared for Council review June 20, 2017 Council reviews Phase 1 Report and provides direction for Phase 2 June 26, 2017 Phase 2 begins August 30, 2017 Phase 2 ends; report prepared for Council review September 6, 2017 Council reviews Phase 2 Report and provides direction for Phase 3 December 12, 2017 Phase 3 ends; report prepared for Council review December 19, 2017 Council review Phase 3 Report; provides direction for Phase 4 December 20, 2017 Phase 4 begins February 27, 2018 Phase 4 ends; report prepared for Council review March 6, 2018 Council reviews Phase 4 Report; provides direction for the future BUDGET This project is budgeted at $60,000. DELIVERABLES At the end of this project the City of Edina will be able to: � Identify areas where change is needed and implement policies and procedures that provide for equal treatment of our community members. This project will also City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal � Create the ability to make continuous improvements in the areas which could have a potential for unequal treatment in our diverse and every changing population, services, facilities and institutions. � Attach research, verifiable data and public opinion as to Edina's current and future needs. SUBMISSION CONTENTS The Proposal response should be fully self-contained, and display clearly and accurately the capabilities, knowledge, experience, and capacity of the respondent to meet the expectations the project. REQUIRED CONTENT At a minimum, the proposal should include the following information: A. Overview & Qualifications: � Firm Description � Types of service(s) provided � Community partnerships or collaborations � Achievements, strengths and specialty of the proposer � Philosophy and experience providing services like this project � Project Team (and sub-consultants, if applicable) by expertise including education and training B. Project Examples � Provide past examples of similar projects or assignments completed by the proposer (and sub-consultants, if applicable) � Describe how the team has performed � Explain final outcomes of the past projects or assignments � Provide professional references and contact information C. Approach & Ability � Describe in detail the proposers approach to fulfilling the scope of work � Describe how the team has performed in the past on projects or similar assignments � Provide a community engagement plan using a variety of techniques and approaches in addition to traditional methods � Provide a meeting schedule for the following groups: Task Force and Working Groups (monthly), City Council (minimum 5), City Staff (monthly), and the Human Rights and Relations Commission (minimum 3). D. Price � Provide the total cost to complete the project � Include a rate schedule breakdown by professional service City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS The proposer should submit: � Twelve (12) bound copies � One electronic copy on a flash drive Submit copies and the flash drive to: City of Edina Administration Department / MJ Lamon 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Submittal Deadline: Friday, April 14 no later than 4:00 pm. Interviews with the most qualified firms will be held on the week of April 24, 2017. To be considered, all requested information below and above shall be submitted. The City will not be responsible for proposals delivered to a person/location other than that specified above. EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES SELECTION TEAM The Race & Equity Task Force will rate prospective consultants for this work using only objective criteria based upon the information obtained from the proposal. The consultants with the highest ranking based on experience and qualifications as described in the proposal will be invited for interviews. The proposed project manager and personnel will be requested to represent the firm at the interviews. SELECTION CRITERIA The task force will evaluate the applicant’s proposal answers to the questions below. A. Explain why your organization can do this work. Rated on background, services provided, strengths, experience, and technical qualifications of the organization and personnel. (20 points) B. Provide examples of similar projects. How has the organization and the personnel proposed for this project, performed in the past on similar assignments? Provide detailed case studies. Provide professional references for organization and sub-contractors, if applicable. (30 points) C. In detail, describe how your organization will approach this work? Outline the proposed approach to the project incorporating the recommended methodology. This section should demonstrate the organizations ability to meet tasks outlined in the Expectations section. (40 points) D. Price. Provide the total cost to complete the project and the breakdown of each professional’s rate schedule. (10 points) City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal SELECTION PROCEDURES Consideration of a prospective consultant’s (firm’s) proposal will be made only if the prospective consultant meets all the minimum requirements of this RFP. Request for Supplemental Information The City reserves the right to require, from any or all consultants (firms), supplemental information that clarifies submitted materials. Questions All questions regarding this solicitation should be directed to the City representative listed in this RFP. Do not attempt to contact other City staff members regarding your submittal or any related proposal submittal. Incomplete Proposals Incomplete and/or unsigned submissions will not be considered. However, if a submission is incomplete, and if it appears that the omission can be corrected promptly, the affected firm may be contacted and offered the opportunity to complete the proposal and provide the required information within a prescribed period, which will not be extended. If a firm does not respond within the time stated, the Proposal will not be considered. Rejection of Submitted RFP Proposals that are not current, accurate, and/or completed accurately in accordance with the prescribed format shall be considered non-responsive and eliminated from further consideration. Selection Process Termination The City reserves the right to terminate the selection process, at any time, without making an award to any or all consultants. Disqualification Factors such as, but not limited to, any of the following may be considered just cause to disqualify a proposal without further consideration: � Any attempt to improperly influence any member of the selection staff; � Existence of any lawsuit, unresolved contractual claim or dispute between consultant and the City; � Evidence of consultant’s inability to successfully complete the responsibilities and obligations of the proposal; and � Consultant’s default under any agreement, which results in termination of the agreement. City of Edina Race & Equity Request for Proposal Appendix D Citizens League RFP Submission SUBMISSION TO CITY OF EDINA RACE & EQUITY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL The Citizens League and its partners (sub-consultants) are submitting this proposal in response to the City of Edina’s Race & Equity Request for Proposal (RFP). The City of Edina has articulated the following objectives for the project, which we believe we can meet: • Identify race-based disparities in Edina’s city government facilities, services, and institutions. • Propose remedies and solutions to the city government policies and operating practices that are creating the disparities. Through our process of one-on-one meetings and facilitated convenings, we will be able to assist the City of Edina: • Identify areas where change is needed and implement policies and procedures that provide for equal treatment of our community members. • Create the ability to make continuous improvements in the areas which could have a potential for unequal treatment in our diverse and every changing population, services, facilities and institutions. • Provided written reports based on research with verifiable data and public opinion as to Edina's current and future needs. A. PROJECT TEAM: QUALIFICATIONS AND SERVICES PROVIDED The Citizens League rarely completes a project alone. Since most of the problems the Citizens League wants to solve are large and complex, we subscribe to a collective impact model, relying heavily on collaborations with partners who bring in their expertise, experience, and their networks so that a project can succeed. The Citizens League’s point of difference is our constant and unwavering focus on politically viable recommendations. While we are skilled community facilitators—able to engage stakeholders at all levels—where we excel is taking insights from facilitated conversations and research and advancing these towards recommendations and final implementation. Our ability to collaborate and effectively share resources has earned us the badge of being a trusted partner. Below is the team we have assembled for this project. CITIZENS LEAGUE Since 1952, the Citizens League has created common ground across parties and ideologies to solve some of the biggest challenges facing Minnesota. From charter schools to the "MN Miracle" to the Metropolitan Council, the League’s tradition of informing and engaging Minnesotans has resulted in real and lasting innovations in public policy and improvements in Minnesota's quality of life. The Citizens League is non-partisan and multi-issue. The Citizens League’s mission is to champion the role of all Minnesotans to govern for the common good and promote democracy. We do this by developing civic leaders in all generations so that they can effectively organize and cultivate the individuals and institutional relationships necessary to achieve these goals. In so doing, we help to create the sustaining civic infrastructure needed to govern and solve problems for the common good in and across all institutions. Services Provided: • Serve a primary contact to City of Edina. This will include but not limited to: o Monitoring and report on progress on project. o Deliver written reports on time. • Manage sub-consultants o Each partner will adhere to Citizens League principles and values. (See attached Citizens League Governing document.) For this project, the Citizens League will be bringing on two sub-consultants as partners: JOI UNLIMITED Dr. Joi Lewis is the founder of Joi Unlimited, a crisis, conflict and change management firm specializing in transformation of systems and self for collective and individual liberation, www.joiunlimited.com Joi Unlimited’s niche is holding space for communities, cities, non-profits, faith-based and educational organizations to build connections across differences and navigate challenging situations in professional and personal journeys. Joi Unlimited is unique in its approach because of its coaching and consulting team is comprised of those most affected by structural inequality and/or those most committed to transforming those structures. Joi Unlimited values those experiences and commitments as high intellectual, cultural and economic capital. Joi Unlimited values content experts who possess a high degree of emotional intelligence to fulfill a growing need for skilled cultural brokers and interpreters of community, organizations, government, and private agency culture. Joi Unlimited is often called to use their strengths in facilitation and communications around issues of mindful leadership, creating a sense of belonging, building authentic relationships across difference, holding space for courageous conversations and social justice for self and systems change. The coaching and consulting team of Joi Unlimited is skilled at interrupting the notion of monolithic leadership in an effort to increase public trust for organizations, institutions, and cities to address crisis, conflict and change. The firm is in the business of transformation of self and systems through the theoretical framework of The Orange Method (OM), which includes the principles and practices of: radical-self-care (healing justice), radical hospitality (diversity, inclusion and equity/social justice) and radical leadership (creating a sense of belonging) as pathways to building effective and well organizations, communities and cities. OM is grounded in the values of personal and collective responsibility. OM ensures that people of color, women, young people and their allies are at the core of the work. The Orange Method is built on principles and practices of restorative social justice, mindful leadership, and building a sense of belonging. The process of transformation is accessed through coaching and consulting sessions, workshops, guided meditation, healing circles, retreats, and community gatherings. The firm provides organizational consultation and executive/leadership coaching as both architects and developers of capacity building for organizations and leaders to not only manage, but deeply engage with conflict, crisis and change. Services Provided: • Key facilitator for race-based discussions. • Review and synthesize finding from discussions. • Provide input on reports. TURNLANE Founded on the idea that vibrant, diverse communities are only built and rebuilt upon authentic human connection, turnlane was created to support relational capacity building at a community level. In this work, turnlane partners with the courageous leaders, teams, and organizations that serve community change efforts in the health, aging, and social justice arenas. The sweet spot of turnlane’s competency set is in the development and facilitation of community process toward social progress. This work includes collective trust building, shared agenda creation, stakeholder value mapping, assessment and analysis of the current state, implementation of shared priorities and initiatives, and evaluation of interventions and initiatives. The result is sustainable, collective progress on the most pressing needs of a given community. Services Provided: • Lead the current state assessment and analysis of Edina’s facilities, services, and institutions. This may include but is not limited to: o A series of one-on-one meetings with both Edina city employees and Edina residents. o Facilitate smaller convenings (example: convene separate conversations for each workgroup, etc.) • Provide facilitation support to Dr. Joi Lewis. • Design an action plan based on the shared priorities and desired outcomes that will support lasting community change, specifically in the areas identified where change is most needed. • Lead in drafting and publishing written reports to support action planning and implementation (including phase reports and final report). B. PROJECT EXAMPLES City of Minneapolis Dialogue and Action Convening (Joi Unlimited) Since 2015, Joi Unlimited has been the lead facilitator holding space for strategic and meaningful conversations in the city of Minneapolis, between city leaders (mayor’s office, city attorney, Minneapolis police department, the Police Oversight Committee, leaders of Black Lives Matter, NAACP and Neighborhoods Organizing for Change. Dr. Joi Lewis has also been a lead facilitator nationally for the National Initiative for Building Trust and Justice in Communities, sponsored by the Department of Justice. This work began in the summer of 2015, before the shooting of Mike Brown in Ferguson and has continued after the shooting of Jamar Clark in Minneapolis. Dr. Joi continues to lead this work with key leaders from the entities named above as well as broader community conversations. This work has been extremely successful as evidenced by the city and community leaders remaining committed to coming to the table at least monthly to address the on-going challenges experienced in the city, particularly after civil unrest. Outcomes and On-going Work Despite the fact that challenging situations have persisted in the city of Minneapolis, much progress has been made through these unlikely relationships being built between community and city leaders. The work is sponsored by the Minneapolis Foundation and the focus now is on what does “Safety Beyond Policing” look like. A city-wide convening is being planned with national thought leaders on this subject for the summer 2017. References for this work: 1. Nicole Archbold- City of Minneapolis Mary Betsy Hodges Office 612.558.1622, Nicole.archbold@minneapolismn,gov 2. Medaria “Rondo” Arradondo, Deputy Police Chief, City of Minneapolis 612.673.3550, medaria.arrandondo@minneapolismn.gov 3. Lena Gardner, Black Lives Matter- Minneapolis and BLUU, 612.747.2324, lenakatherine@gmail.com 4. Luz Maria Frias, CEO- YWCA Minneapolis 612.215.4135, lfrias@ywcampls.org The Mill City Kids Initiative (turnlane) Given the ongoing educational and socioeconomic disparities that persist among populations of children across the state of Minnesota, a coalition of cross-sector stakeholders convened in the fall of 2015 to explore ways to foster needed community and systems change. Through months of intentional trust-building and shared agenda creation that was co-led by Alex Clark, the Mill City Kids Initiative was born to address the impacts of structural racism and historical trauma on children (ages prenatal to five) within African American and Native American communities. The process identified the following Theory of Change elements: • Frame child (prenatal to age 5) well-being within the context of historical trauma and structural racism • See each individual’s stake in the issues surrounding these children and the responsibility to respond differently • Mobilize leaders across systems to foster needed short-term change • Adopt/Invest In child, family, and community-centered approaches This process included broad engagement from various stakeholders, which included: people and families within the African- American and Native American communities, government leaders (city, county, and state), health care, child protection, housing, social services, education, and early childhood development. Outcomes and On-going Work Today, the Mill City Kids Initiative is engaging with communities and systems to foster a deeper understanding of trauma and inequities, equip and activate parents and families to better support child development, and affect multi-system change for child and family well-being. Community healing and dialogue is being pursued while system changes are being explored across a number of sectors. References for this work: 1. Dr. Helen Kim – Mother-Baby Program Director, Hennepin County Medical Center (HCMC) 612.702.4410, kimxx237@umn.edu 2. Christine Smith, Health Equity/Tribal Grants Supervisor, Minnesota Department of Health 651.201.5813, christine.smith@state.mn.us 3. Daniel Gumnit – CEO of People Serving People 612.332.4500, dgumnit@peopleservingpeople.org Metropolitan Council Task Force (Citizens League) In 2015, the Citizens League convened a study committee to examine the concerns and criticisms around the Metropolitan Council (Council). The Council plays a key in transportation, housing, parks and trails, and issues of equity in the region and the state. Because of these important responsibilities and its large budget to accomplish its goals, it has always been a political target by both the left and the right. Anticipating that Council reforms would play a role in the 2016 legislative discussions, the Citizens League assembled a diverse task force representing different sectors, ideologies, geographic locations, and experience. Some members had direct experience with the Council while others had none. The goal was to ensure that the committee’s conversations and deliberations reflected the conversations and disagreements that were taking place in the larger community. This task force or study committee started with a strong foundation of data from community experts and staff research. Next, the study committee developed consensus about the facts in order to arrive at conclusions. The committee then developed recommendations. From beginning to end, the Citizens League work impacted legislators, Council leadership, the Governor’s office, lobbyists/special interest groups, and of course citizens. We were quoted in numerous articles and legislative hearings as having an inclusive process that resulted in a balance set of policy solutions. Many were adopted in legislative bills. References for this work: 1. Senator Scott Dibble – Transportation Finance and Policy, Ranking Minority Member 651.296.4191, scottd@senate.mn 2. Susan Arntz, City Administrator, City of Waconia (Dakota County) 952.442.3100, sarntz@waconia.org 3. Peter Bell, former Chair, Metropolitan Council pbell51@gmail.com C. APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY Phase 1 – Assess Fact-Finding and other Discovery Activities During this discovery stage, Citizens League staff and the turnlane team will hold a series of one-on-one meetings and small group discussions with City Council members, the City Manager, members of the Race & Equity Task Force, the various working groups that serve Facilities, Services, and Institutions, as well as members from the Government Alliance on Race and Equity Team (GARE). Additionally, members of the broader Edina community will be engaged in these initial conversations. The goal of this work is to learn about possible racial disparities that might exist in city services and/or whether there is evidence that institutional bias is repressing people of color from participating on City boards and commissions. The careful handling of this highly sensitive topic is critical. We will make clear to participants that we do not have priori conclusions and therefore are not looking for evidence to support presumptions. Instead, we are looking to understand the questions they may have. The surfacing of questions and insights will help to inform later facilitated discussions. At the end of this stage, we will report out what we have heard and learned from these various community stakeholders. They will have the opportunity to confirm their input was included in the synthesis of this phase. If necessary, we will facilitate a prioritization exercise to narrow the planning focus and opportunities for action. This phase of the process may also include public meetings, community conversations, and web-based forums. Schedule: May –August 2017 Phase 2 – Plan Community Conversation Design, Strategy, and Methodology In Phase 2, we will use what we learned in Phase 1 to inform a series of facilitated race-based discussions led by Dr. Joi Lewis. For the facilitated discussions, we recommend the use of the Orange Method (OM) created by Dr. Joi Lewis along with the Citizens League’s governing principles (see attached Citizens League Governing Document). The Orange Method (OM) is an iterative process of crowd sourcing in the field and community engagement. Joi Unlimited applies it with clients in coaching and consulting through intergenerational practices from our ancestors, elders, and young people in the context of present day opportunities and challenges. These offer a meaningful approach for fully reclaiming humanity and building authentic relationships across differences. This method of facilitation, consultation, and coaching is grounded in the principles of, Radical Leadership, Radical Hospitality, Radical Self-Care and energy management as strategies for self and system transformation. Dr. Joi Lewis will lead in the facilitated discussions with the City Council (including city manager), the Edina Race & Equity Task Force, the various Working Groups, and GARE to accomplish the following objectives: • Encourage stronger connection and sense of belonging to and in the City of Edina (particularly in light of an intense political terrain in the U.S. and around the world) • Create safe spaces to heal from historic and present day trauma and an emphasis on Radical Self-Care in community. • Agreement on desired next steps and outcomes. To meet these objectives, we will create and facilitate a meaningful and engaging dialogue experience leading to a stronger grounding for the community to build capacity and deepen the commitment and approach toward social justice/healing justice and liberation. The work would be guided by the context of the City of Edina, our state, the country and the world more broadly. We view the facilitated dialogue as a prime opportunity to increase capacity for understanding and engaging with the shifts in the organizational culture in the context of the history and current day reality of the community and the larger society at the individual and group level. Therefore, we recommend these overall objectives for the community conversations/gatherings: • Create safe space + self-reflection + establish common ground = provide opportunities to increase trust, • Re-affirm the City’s commitment to social justice and liberation in the context of organizational structure and change, and • Increase sense of belonging through re-connecting with self and others. Mix-Method Model The intent is to employ a mix-method model approach grounded in the context of the history and contemporary narrative of the City of Edina and the U.S. in the context of world. This kind of approach will build on the strong foundation, while at the same time build capacity for success as a more “culturally responsive” internal and external organization. The space holding and facilitation methods will be engaging and delivered through a variety of learning and development methods, modes, and take-away practices and tools. Some of the techniques we employ are: the use of circle, narrative as liberatory pedagogy, movement, mindfulness and meditation, concentric circles, writing and reflection, and other active and passive learning modalities. Learning Outcomes We will provide facilitation that is designed to deepen capacity of four key areas: 1. Self-Awareness 2. Awareness of Others 3. Courageous Action 4. Collaboration Required Pre-work 1. Confirm goals and objectives in RFP with City of Edina. 2. Complete Phase 1 Assessment. 3. Community Conversation Design: The consultants will custom design the workshops in partnership with the City of Edina to meet goals and outcomes. (During the design process, we will also decide together how many facilitated discussions are appropriate.) 4. Material Development: The consultants will develop materials for participant use and work with the City of Edina for material duplication or reimbursement. 5. Self-awareness: The consultants will use the Orange Method process to create opportunities for self-awareness. Schedule: July–August 2017 Phase 3 – Act Creating Action for Impact After the series of facilitated discussions, we will assist the City of Edina in facilitating and leading a process to compile the prioritized list of desired outcomes—a deliverable from the discussions—and begin to work closer with the City Council and staff in designing an action plan based on shared priorities and those desired outcomes that will support lasting community change. During this stage of the work, ongoing stakeholder engagement (across groups) will be key to fostering the necessary support for the plans and recommendations and maintaining a level of trust needed for widespread implementation. As such, it will be critical to continue working with the Task Force members and the various Working Groups, especially as any major decisions or activities are being considered. This Phase will require ongoing coordination with City Council and staff. The final work product of this Phase will be a fully developed action plan that is supported by the various stakeholders engaged in the process. This plan will include clear steps to be taken and accountabilities. Scheduled: September – November 2017 Phase 4 – Evaluate and Final Report Fostering activities to sustain lasting change While the RFP lists evaluation only in the last stage (Phase 4), we would employ continuous evaluation activities after each phase of this project to assess progress on stated goals of the project. Specific to this final Phase, we see Phase 4 as the formal compiling and review of all evaluation activities, which would gauge progress in achieving various process and outcomes measures that have been identified within the RFP. Additionally, our project team will support the Task Force in identifying long-term outcomes and measures that can be tracked over time as part of ongoing continuous improvement and accountability efforts for the city. Finally, during this Phase, a final report that highlights the City’s process and action plan will be delivered to inform future implementation activities and to guide ongoing work the city may undertake in ensuring Edina is a welcoming community for all. Schedule: December 2017 – March 2018 D. PRICE CITIZENS LEAGUE Overall Project Management • Key liaison between consultants and City of Edina • Overall project management • Administrative support to sub-consultants • Assist in project design • Meetings and debriefs $15,000 JOI UNLIMITED Race-Based Facilitated Discussions • Pre-meetings (consultation time) • Project design (prep and consulting time) • Material preparation • Dialogues and community gatherings • Debrief meetings and report prep/review $20,000 TURNLANE Planning and Documentation • Identify goals and outcomes for project • Establish targeted meetings and small forums • Design questions, plan agendas, and create evaluation methods for meetings and discussions • Assist in the consultation with project team • Provide synthesis of key take-aways from meetings and discussions that can be shared with City Council and other stakeholders • Work with project team and City of Edina to identify follow up interviewees and shape next steps • Lead in the development of final evaluations and report $25,000 Total Project Budget $60,000 Contact information for any questions or concerns related to this proposal: Pahoua Yang Hoffman, Policy Director, Citizens League 651.289.1071, phoffman@citizensleague.org Citizens League’s Governing Document June 1, 2016 An internal document for Citizens League Board, staff, members and key partners that describes who we are, how we do our work, and how we measure success. Mission. The Citizens League is a member-supported nonpartisan nonprofit organization that champions the role of all Minnesotans to govern for the common good and promote democracy. Vision Statement. Through our work: • Minnesotans of all backgrounds, parties and ideologies are engaged, inspired and empowered to see the role they play in public policy and act on it, reigniting Minnesota’s ability to implement innovative and effective policy solutions for the 21st Century; and • The Citizens League is a relevant and respected policy resource, leveraging the strength of our 60-year legacy with a focus on solving tomorrow’s problems, and earning the ongoing support of our members, board, leadership and staff. Operating Guidelines. We are unique in our ability to address how policy happens. We do this by: • Bringing diverse perspectives and people together. We serve as a rare neutral convener – true “common ground for the common good” – in a fractured political and policy landscape. o Standard: People impacted by a problem should help to define it in light of their own self-interest and the common interest of all Minnesotans. Bringing people together across boundaries of ideology, backgrounds, race/ethnicity, geography, sectors and parties produces a better definition of the problem. Ideally, this process should help clarify the role that individuals and organizations can and should play in policy questions. • Advancing policy solutions in collaboration with a broad base of support. Engaging diverse stakeholders creates the breadth of resources necessary to impact policy. o Standard: Transparency and good governance are critical to building trust between all parties involved in the process, and evaluation is critical at every stage. If people trust the process, they are more likely to trust the outcome. • Reframing the conversation. People look to the Citizens League for objectivity: weighing short- term self-interests of all parties involved and long-term needs of Minnesota. We work with all types of Minnesotans to understand important public policy issues and the role citizens can play in contributing to solutions. o Standard: Data and evidence-based research should be the foundation for decision- making, and policy statements of all types must be accessible and connect the larger systemic policy issues to the real stories of Minnesotans impacted by these policies. • Considering political pragmatism along with policy idealism. The goal is not just to promote a set of ideas or proposals, but to have a real and sustained impact on the policies and systems that impact the quality of life and economic health of Minnesotans. o Standard: Our proposals should be politically achievable and plausible inside a variety of organizations and sectors, including but not limited to government, without sacrificing the long-term interests of Minnesotans. Appendix E GARE Racial Equity Tool Kit Racial Equity Toolkit An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity RACIALEQUITYALLIANCE.ORG TOOLKIT This toolkit is published by the Government Alliance on Race and Equity, a national network of government working to achieve racial equity and advance opportunities for all. AUTHORS Julie Nelson, Director, Government Alliance on Race and Equity Lisa Brooks, University of Washington School of Social Work COPYEDITING Ebonye Gussine Wilkins, Haas Institute LAYOUT/PRODUCTION Ebonye Gussine Wilkins and Rachelle Galloway-Popotas, Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society CONTACT INFO Julie Nelson jnelson@thecsi.org 206-816-5104 GARE IS A JOINT PROJECT OF RACIALEQUITYALLIANCE.ORG UPDATED DEC 2016 Government Alliance on Race and Equity ABOUT THE GOVERNMENT ALLIANCE ON RACE & EQUITY The Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE) is a national network of government working to achieve racial equity and advance opportunities for all. Across the country, governmental jurisdictions are: • making a commitment to achieving racial equity; • focusing on the power and influence of their own institutions; and, • working in partnership with others. When this occurs, significant leverage and expansion opportunities emerge, setting the stage for the achievement of racial equity in our communities. GARE provides a multi-layered approach for maximum impact by: • supporting jurisdictions that are at the forefront of work to achieve racial equity. A few jurisdictions have already done substantive work and are poised to be a model for others. Supporting and providing best practices, tools and resources is helping to build and sustain current efforts and build a national movement for racial equity; • developing a “pathway for entry” into racial equity work for new jurisdictions from across the country. Many jurisdictions lack the leadership and/or infrastructure to address issues of racial inequity. Using the learnings and resources from jurisdictions at the forefront will create pathways for the increased engagement of more jurisdictions; and, • supporting and building local and regional collaborations that are broadly inclusive and focused on achieving racial equity. To eliminate racial inequities in our communities, devel- oping a “collective impact” approach firmly grounded in inclusion and equity is necessary. Government can play a key role in collaborations for achieving racial equity, centering community, and leveraging institutional partnerships. To find out more about GARE, visit www.racialequityalliance.org. TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity 3 I. What is a Racial Equity Tool? Racial equity tools are designed to integrate explicit consideration of racial equity in decisions, including policies, practices, programs, and budgets. It is both a product and a process. Use of a racial equity tool can help to develop strategies and actions that reduce racial inequities and improve success for all groups. Too often, policies and programs are developed and implemented without thoughtful con- sideration of racial equity. When racial equity is not explicitly brought into operations and decision-making, racial inequities are likely to be perpetuated. Racial equity tools provide a structure for institutionalizing the consideration of racial equity. A racial equity tool: • proactively seeks to eliminate racial inequities and advance equity; • identifies clear goals, objectives and measurable outcomes; • engages community in decision-making processes; • identifies who will benefit or be burdened by a given decision, examines potential unin- tended consequences of a decision, and develops strategies to advance racial equity and mitigate unintended negative consequences; and, • develops mechanisms for successful implementation and evaluation of impact. Use of a racial equity tool is an important step to operationalizing equity. However, it is not sufficient by itself. We must have a much broader vision of the transformation of government in order to advance racial equity. To transform government, we must normalize conversations about race, operationalize new behaviors and policies, and organize to achieve racial equity. For more information on the work of government to advance racial equity, check out GARE’s “Advancing Racial Equity and Transforming Government: A Resource Guide for Putting Ideas into Action” on our website. The Resource Guide provides a comprehensive and holistic ap- proach to advancing racial equity within government. In addition, an overview of key racial equity definitions is contained in Appendix A. II. Why should government use this Racial Equity Tool? From the inception of our country, government at the local, regional, state, and federal level has played a role in creating and maintaining racial inequity. A wide range of laws and policies were passed, including everything from who could vote, who could be a citizen, who could own property, who was property, where one could live, whose land was whose and more. With the Civil Rights movement, laws and policies were passed that helped to create positive changes, including making acts of discrimination illegal. However, despite progress in addressing explicit discrimination, racial inequities continue to be deep, pervasive, and persistent across the country. Racial inequities exist across all indicators for success, including in education, criminal justice, jobs, housing, public infrastructure, and health, regardless of region. Many current inequities are sustained by historical legacies and structures and systems that repeat patterns of exclusion. Institutions and structures have continued to create and per- petuate inequities, despite the lack of explicit intention. Without intentional intervention, institutions and structures will continue to perpetuate racial inequities. Government has the ability to implement policy change at multiple levels and across multiple sectors to drive larger systemic change. Routine use of a racial equity tool explicitly integrates racial equity into gov- ernmental operations. Local and regional governmental jurisdictions that are a part of the GARE are using a racial eq- uity tool. Some, such as the city of Seattle in Washington, Multnomah County in Oregon, and TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity Government Alliance on Race and Equity 4 Government Alliance on Race and Equity the city of Madison in Wisconsin have been doing so for many years: • The Seattle Race and Social Justice Initiative (RSJI) is a citywide effort to end institution- alized racism and race-based disparities in City government. The Initiative was launched in 2004. RSJI includes training to all City employees, annual work plans, and change teams in every city department. RSJI first started using its Racial Equity Tool during the budget process in 2007. The following year, in recognition of the fact that the budget process was just the “tip of the ice berg,” use of the tool was expanded to be used in policy and pro- gram decisions. In 2009, Seattle City Council included the use of the Racial Equity Tool in budget, program and policy decisions, including review of existing programs and policies, in a resolution (Resolution 31164) affirming the City’s Race and Social Justice Initiative. In 2015, newly elected Mayor Ed Murray issued an Executive Order directing expanded use of the Racial Equity Tool, and requiring measurable outcomes and greater accountability. See Appendix B for examples of how Seattle has used its Racial Equity Tool, including legisla- tion that offers protections for women who are breastfeeding and use of criminal background checks in employment decisions. Multnomah County’s Equity and Empowerment Lens is used to improve planning, deci- sion-making, and resource allocation leading to more racially equitable policies and programs. At its core, it is a set of principles, reflective questions, and processes that focuses at the indi- vidual, institutional, and systemic levels by: • deconstructing what is not working around racial equity; • reconstructing and supporting what is working; • shifting the way we make decisions and think about this work; and, • healing and transforming our structures, our environments, and ourselves. Numerous Multnomah County departments have made commitments to utilizing the Lens, including a health department administrative policy and within strategic plans of specific de- partments. Tools within the Lens are used both to provide analysis and to train employers and partners on how Multnomah County conducts equity analysis. Madison, Wisconsin is implementing a racial equity tool, including both a short version and a more in-depth analysis. See Appendix D for a list of the types of projects on which the city of Madison has used their racial equity tool. For jurisdictions that are considering implementation of a racial equity tool, these jurisdictions examples are powerful. Other great examples of racial equity tools are from the Annie E. Casey Foundation and Race Forward. In recognition of the similar ways in which institutional and structural racism have evolved across the country, GARE has developed this Toolkit that captures the field of practice and commonalities across tools. We encourage jurisdictions to begin using our Racial Equity Tool. Based on experience, customization can take place if needed to ensure that it is most relevant to local conditions. Otherwise, there is too great of a likelihood that there will be a significant investment of time, and potentially money, in a lengthy process of customization without experience. It is through the implementation and the experience of learning that leaders and staff will gain experience with use of a tool. After a pilot project trying out this tool, jurisdictions will have a better understanding of how and why it might make sense to customize a tool. For examples of completed racial equity analyses, check out Appendix B and Appendix D, which includes two examples from the city of Seattle, as well as a list of the topics on which the city of Madison has used their racial equity tool. Please note: In this Resource Guide, we include some data from reports that fo- cused on whites and African Americans, but otherwise, pro- vide data for all ra- cial groups analyzed in the research. For consistency, we refer to African Americans and Latinos, although in some of the original research, these groups were referred to as Blacks and Hispanics. TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity 5 I. Who should use a racial equity tool? A racial equity tool can be used at multiple levels, and in fact, doing so, will increase effectiveness. • Government staff: The routine use of a racial equity tool by staff provides the opportunity to integrate racial equity across the breadth, meaning all governmental functions, and depth, meaning across hier- archy. For example, policy analysts integrating racial equity into policy development and implementation, and budget analysts integrating racial equity into budget proposals at the earliest possible phase, increases the likelihood of impact. Employees are the ones who know their jobs best and will be best equipped to integrate racial equity into practice and routine operations. • Elected officials: Elected officials have the opportunity to use a racial equity tool to set broad priorities, bringing consistency between values and practice. When our elected officials are integrating racial equity into their jobs, it will be reflected in the priorities of the jurisdiction, in direction provided to department directors, and in the questions asked of staff. By asking simple racial equity tool questions, such as “How does this decision help or hinder racial equity?” or “Who benefits from or is burdened by this decision?” on a routine basis, elected officials have the ability to put theory into action. • Community based organizations: Community based organizations can ask questions of government about use of racial equity tool to ensure accountability. Elected officials and government staff should be easily able to describe the results of their use of a racial equity tool, and should make that information readily available to community members. In addi- tion, community based organizations can use a similar or aligned racial equity tool within their own organizations to also advance racial equity. II. When should you use a racial equity tool? The earlier you use a racial equity tool, the better. When racial equity is left off the table and not addressed until the last minute, the use of a racial equity tool is less likely to be fruitful. Using a racial equity tool early means that individual decisions can be aligned with organizational racial equity goals and desired outcomes. Using a racial equity tool more than once means that equity is incorporated throughout all phases, from development to implementation and evaluation. III. The Racial Equity Tool The Racial Equity Tool is a simple set of questions: 1. Proposal: What is the policy, program, practice or budget decision under consideration? What are the desired results and outcomes? 2. Data: What’s the data? What does the data tell us? 3. Community engagement: How have communities been engaged? Are there opportunities to expand engagement? 4. Analysis and strategies: Who will benefit from or be burdened by your proposal? What are your strategies for advancing racial equity or mitigating unintended consequences? 5. Implementation: What is your plan for implementation? TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity Government Alliance on Race and Equity 6 Race and Equity 1. Accountability and communication: How will you ensure accountability, communicate, and evaluate results? The following sections provide a description of the overall questions. Once you are ready to jump into action, please check out the worksheet that can be found in Appendix C. STEP #1 What is your proposal and the desired results and outcomes? While it might sound obvious, having a clear description of the policy, program, practice, or budget decision (for the sake of brevity, we refer to this as a “proposal” in the remainder of these steps) at hand is critical. We should also be vigilant in our focus on impact. The terminology for results and outcomes is informed by our relationship with Results Based Accountability™. This approach to measurement clearly delineates between community con- ditions / population accountability and performance accountability / outcomes. These levels share a common systematic approach to measurement. This approach emphasizes the impor- tance of beginning with a focus on the desired “end” condition. • Results are at the community level are the end conditions we are aiming to impact. Com- munity indicators are the means by which we can measure impact in the community. Community indicators should be disaggregated by race. • Outcomes are at the jurisdiction, department, or program level. Appropriate performance measures allow monitoring of the success of implementation of actions that have a rea- sonable chance of influencing indicators and contributing to results. Performance mea- sures respond to three different levels: a. Quantity—how much did we do? b. Quality—how well did we do it? c. Is anyone better off? We encourage you to be clear about the desired end conditions in the community and to emphasize those areas where you have the most direct influence. When you align community indicators, government strategies, and performance measures, you maximize the likelihood for impact. To ultimately impact community conditions, government must partner with other institutions and the community. You should be able to answer the following questions: 1. Describe the policy, program, practice, or budget decision under consideration? 2. What are the intended results (in the community) and outcomes (within your organization)? 3. What does this proposal have an ability to impact? • Children and youth • Community engagement • Contracting equity • Criminal justice • Economic development • Education • Environment • Food access and affordability • Government practices • Health • Housing • Human services • Jobs • Planning and development • Transportation • Utilities • Workforce equity TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity Government Alliance on 7 Government Alliance on Race and Equity STEP #2 What’s the data? What does the data tell us? Measurement matters. When organizations are committed to racial equity, it is not just an as- piration, but there is a clear understanding of racial inequities, and strategies and actions are developed and implemented that align between community conditions, strategies, and actions. Using data appropriately will allow you to assess whether you are achieving desired impacts. Too often data might be available, but is not actually used to inform strategies and track results. The enormity of racial inequities can sometimes feel overwhelming. For us to have impact in the community, we must partner with others for cumulative impact. The work of government to advance racial equity is necessary, but not sufficient. Nevertheless, alignment and clarity will increase potential impact. We must use data at both levels; that is data that clearly states 1) community indicators and desired results, and 2) our specific program or poli- cy outcomes and performance measures. Performance measures allow monitoring of the success of implementation of actions that have a reasonable chance of influencing indicators and contributing to results. As indicated in Step 1, performance measures respond to three different levels: Quantity—how much did we do? Quality—how well did we do it? Is anyone better off? Although measuring whether anyone is actually better off as a result of a decision is highly de- sired, we also know there are inherent measurement challenges. You should assess and collect the best types of performance measures so that you are able to track your progress. In analyzing data, you should think not only about quantitative data, but also qualitative data. Remember that sometimes missing data can speak to the fact that certain communities, issues or inequities have historically been overlooked. Sometimes data sets treat communities as a monolithic group without respect to subpopulations with differing socioeconomic and cultur- al experience. Using this data could perpetuate historic inequities. Using the knowledge and expertise of a diverse set of voices, along with quantitative data is necessary (see Step #3). You should be able to answer the following questions about data: 1. Will the proposal have impacts in specific geographic areas (neighborhoods, areas, or regions)? What are the racial demographics of those living in the area? 2. What does population level data tell you about existing racial inequities? What does it tell you about root causes or factors influencing racial inequities? 3. What performance level data do you have available for your proposal? This should include data associated with existing programs or policies. 4. Are there data gaps? What additional data would be helpful in analyzing the proposal? If so, how can you obtain better data? Data Resources Federal • American FactFinder: The US Census Bureau’s main site for online access to population, housing, economic and geographic data. http://factfinder.census.gov • US Census Quick Facts: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html • Center for Disease Control (CDC) http://wonder.cdc.gov TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity 8 State • American FactFinder and the US Census website also have state data. http://factfinder.census.gov • Other sources of data vary by state. Many states offer data through the Office of Financial Management. Other places to find data include specific departments and divisions. Local • American FactFinder and the US Census website also have local data. http://factfinder.census.gov • Many jurisdictions have lots of city and county data available. Other places to find data include specific departments and divisions, service providers, community partners, and research literature. STEP #3 How have communities been engaged? Are there opportunities to expand engagement? It is not enough to consult data or literature to assume how a proposal might impact a com- munity. Involving communities impacted by a topic, engaging community throughout all phases of a project, and maintaining clear and transparent communication as the policy or program is implemented will help produce more racially equitable results. It is especially critical to engage communities of color. Due to the historical reality of the role of government in creating and maintaining racial inequities, it is not surprising that commu- nities of color do not always have much trust in government. In addition, there is a likelihood that other barriers exist, such as language, perception of being welcome, and lack of public transportation, or childcare. For communities with limited English language skills, appropriate language materials and translation must be provided. Government sometimes has legal requirements on the holding of public meetings. These are often structured as public hearings, with a limited time for each person to speak and little op- portunity for interaction. It is important to go beyond these minimum requirements by using community meetings, focus groups, and consultations with commissions, advisory boards, and community-based organizations. A few suggestions that are helpful: • When you use smaller groups to feed into a larger process, be transparent about the recommendations and/or thoughts that come out of the small groups (e.g. Have a list of all the groups you met with and a summary of the recommendations from each. That way you have documentation of what came up in each one, and it is easier to demonstrate the process). • When you use large group meetings, provide a mix of different ways for people to engage, such as the hand-held voting devices, written comments that you collect, small groups, etc. It is typical, both because of structure and process, for large group discussions to lead to the participation of fewer voices. Another approach is to use dyads where people “interview” each other, and then report on what their partner shared. Sometimes people are more comfortable sharing other people’s information. • Use trusted advocates/outreach and engagement liaisons to collect information from communities that you know are typically underrepresented in public processes. Again, sharing and reporting that information in a transparent way allows you to share it with TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity 9 others. For communities that have concerns about documentation status and interaction with government in general, this can be a particularly useful strategy. Here are a few examples of good resources for community engagement: • The City of Seattle Inclusive Outreach and Public Engagement Guide • The City of Portland’s Public Engagement Guide You should be able to answer the following questions about community engagement and in- volving stakeholders: 1. Who are the most affected community members who are concerned with or have expe- rience related to this proposal? How have you involved these community members in the development of this proposal? 2. What has your engagement process told you about the burdens or benefits for different groups? 3. What has your engagement process told you about the factors that produce or perpetuate racial inequity related to this proposal? STEP #4 Who benefits from or will be burdened by your proposal? What are your strategies for advancing racial equity or mitigating unintended consequenc- es? Based on your data and stakeholder input, you should step back and assess your proposal and think about complementary strategies that will help to advance racial equity. Governmental decisions are often complex and nuanced with both intended and unintend- ed impacts. For example, when cities and counties face the necessity of making budget cuts due to revenue shortfalls, the goal is to balance the budget and the unintended consequence is that people and communities suffer the consequences of cut programs. In a situation like this, it is important to explicitly consider the unintended consequences so that impacts can be mitigated to the maximum extent possible. We often tend to view policies, programs, or practices in isolation. Because racial inequities are perpetuated through systems and structures, it is important to also think about comple- mentary approaches that will provide additional leverage to maximize the impact on racial inequity in the community. Expanding your proposal to integrate policy and program strate- gies and broad partnerships will help to increase the likelihood of community impact. Here are some examples: • Many excellent programs have been developed or are being supported through health programs and social services. Good programs and services should continue to be support- ed, however, programs will never be sufficient to ultimately achieve racial equity in the community. If you are working on a program, think about policy and practice changes that can decrease the need for programs. • Many jurisdictions have passed “Ban-the-Box” legislation, putting limitations on the use of criminal background checks in employment and/or housing decisions. While this is a policy that is designed to increase the likelihood of success for people coming out of in- carceration, it is not a singular solution to racial inequities in the criminal justice system. To advance racial equity in the criminal justice system, we need comprehensive strategies that build upon good programs, policies, and partnerships. You should be able to answer the following questions about strategies to advance racial equity: 1. Given what you have learned from the data and stakeholder involvement, how will the TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity Government Alliance on Race and Equity 10 Race and Equity proposal increase or decrease racial equity? Who would benefit from or be burdened by your proposal? 1. What are potential unintended consequences? What are the ways in which your proposal could be modified to enhance positive impacts or reduce negative impacts? 2. Are there complementary strategies that you can implement? What are ways in which existing partnerships could be strengthened to maximize impact in the community? How will you partner with stakeholders for long-term positive change? 3. Are the impacts aligned with the your community outcomes defined in Step #1? STEP #5 What is your plan for implementation? Now that you know what the unintended consequences, benefits, and impacts of the proposal and have developed strategies to mitigate unintended consequences or expand impact, it is important to focus on thoughtful implementation. You should be able to answer the following about implementation: 1. Describe your plan for implementation. 2. Is your plan: • realistic? • adequately funded? • adequately resourced with personnel?; • adequately resourced with mechanisms to ensure successful implementation and enforcement? • adequately resourced to ensure on-going data collection, public reporting, and community engagement? If the answer to any of these questions is no, what resources or actions are needed? STEP #6 How will you ensure accountability, communicate, and evaluate results? Just as data was critical in analyzing potential impacts of the program or policy, data will be important in seeing whether the program or policy has worked. Developing mechanisms for collecting data and evaluating progress will help measure whether racial equity is being ad- vanced. Accountability entails putting processes, policies, and leadership in place to ensure that pro- gram plans, evaluation recommendations, and actions leading to the identification and elimi- nation of root causes of inequities are actually implemented. How you communicate about your racial equity proposal is also important for your success. Poor communication about race can trigger implicit bias or perpetuate stereotypes, often times unintentionally. Use a communications tool, such as the Center for Social Inclusion’s Talking About Race Right Toolkit to develop messages and a communications strategy. Racial equity tools should be used on an ongoing basis. Using a racial equity tool at different phases of a project will allow now opportunities for advancing racial equity to be identified and implemented. Evaluating results means that you will be able to make any adjustments to maximize impact. You should be able to answer the following questions about accountability and implementation: TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity Government Alliance on 11 1. How will impacts be documented and evaluated? Are you achieving the anticipated out- comes? Are you having impact in the community? 2. What are your messages and communication strategies that are will help advance racial equity? 3. How will you continue to partner and deepen relationships with communities to make sure your work to advance racial equity is working and sustainable for the long haul? I. What if you don’t have enough time? The reality of working in government is that there are often unanticipated priorities that are sometimes inserted on a fast track. While it is often tempting to say that there is insufficient time to do a full and complete application of a racial equity tool, it is important to acknowledge that even with a short time frame, asking a few questions relating to racial equity can have a meaningful impact. We suggest that the following questions should be answered for “quick turn around” decisions: • What are the racial equity impacts of this particular decision? • Who will benefit from or be burdened by the particular decision? • Are there strategies to mitigate the unintended consequences? II. How can you address barriers to successful implementation? You may have heard the phrase, “the system is perfectly designed to get the outcomes it does.” For us to get to racially equitable outcomes, we need to work at the institutional and struc- tural levels. As a part of institutions and systems, it is often a challenge to re-design systems, let alone our own individual jobs. One of the biggest challenges is often a skills gap. Use of a racial equity tool requires skill and competency, so it will be important for jurisdictions to provide training, mentoring, and support for managers and staff who are using the tool. GARE has a training curriculum that supports this Toolkit, as well as a “train-the-trainer” program to increase the capacity of racial equity advocates using the Toolkit. Other barriers to implementation that some jurisdictions have experienced include: • a lack of support from leadership; • a tool being used in isolation; • a lack of support for implementing changes; and, • perfection (which can be the enemy of good). Strategies for addressing these barriers include: • building the capacity of racial equity teams. Training is not just to cultivate skills for indi- vidual employees, but is also to build the skill of teams to create support for group imple- mentation and to create a learning culture; • systematizing the use of the Racial Equity Tool. If the Racial Equity Tool is integrated into routine operations, such as budget proposal forms or policy briefing forms, then manage- ment and staff will know that it is an important priority; • recognizing complexity. In most cases, public policy decisions are complex, and there are numerous pros, cons and trade-offs to be considered. When the Racial Equity Tool is used on an iterative basis, complex nuances can be addressed over time; and, TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity Government Alliance on 12 Government Alliance on Race and Equity • maintaining accountability. Build the expectation that managers and directors routinely use the Racial Equity Tool into job descriptions or performance agreements. Institutionalizing use of a racial equity tool provides the opportunity to develop thoughtful, realistic strategies and timelines that advance racial equity and help to build long-term com- mitment and momentum. I. How does use of a racial equity tool fit with other racial equity strategies? Using a racial equity tool is an important step to operationalizing equity. However, it is not sufficient by itself. We must have a much broader vision of the transformation of government in order to advance racial equity. To transform government, we must normalize conversations about race, operationalize new behaviors and policies, and organize to achieve racial equity. GARE is seeing more and more jurisdictions that are making a commitment to achieving racial equity, by focusing on the power and influence of their own institutions, and working in part- nership across sectors and with the community to maximize impact. We urge you to join with others on this work. If you are interested in using a racial equity tool and/or joining local and regional government from across the country to advance racial equity, please let us know. TOOLKIT Racial Equity Toolkit: An Opportunity to Operationalize Equity 13 Appendix F Orange Method The Orange Method (OM) Practice of Radical Self-Care & Radical Hospitality Our process offers hope and practical application in challenging time. Yes, really awful things, like oppression and trauma, keep getting in the way of us getting to fully have each other, to get to reclaim our full humanity and to see the humanity of others. The Orange Method expects no DEMANDS, that we interrupt and end cycles of OPPRESSION in our lifetime! We need for folks from our communities to get to be the thought leaders and healers in this work. Dr. Joi Lewis, Founder and CEO of Joi Unlimited, www.joiunlimited.com developed a process of TRANSFORMATION & HEALING called the Orange Method (OM); it reminds us of our inherent goodness, to help us build a strong sense of belonging, to promote personal and communal liberation, and to help us reclaim our full humanity. OM is a sacred sound meaning self within and the entirety of the universe. I was reminded of the deep powerful meaning of OM during my yoga teacher training and I return to it again and again, in my healing practices; these are legacies from my ancestors and yours. “Dr. Joi” Lewis, incorporated the energy of OM into the creation of the Orange Method (OM). It is a process of transformation and liberation that mirrors the yoga tradition of knowing your limitations. Like yoga, the Orange Method encompasses the need for therapeutic spaces, healthy eating, conscious movement, and emotional liberation. OM is grounded in the deep concept of Healing Justice. The Orange Method helps individuals and institutions to transform against the backdrop of oppression-induced trauma. We do this by creating boundaries at work, falling in love with self and community again or perhaps for the first time, and developing better access to the healthy expression of grief and pain. Similarly, yoga asks the student to detach, find self-acceptance, and face their emotions with honesty. Transformation lies in getting at the core of your symptoms. The Orange Method, combined with radical self-care strategies, offers us a start, one that is accessible to every human being who truly believes in transformation and liberation, particularly those of us who have been historically left out. The Orange Method(OM) invites us to walk the journey of liberation and building a sense of belonging together, we then become co-conspirators in making our world better for all. OM invites us to bring our wholeselves to this process: every part of you is welcome, the joy and the pain. OM is a both a kind and rigorous progress it requires much of us, because healing is serious business. Sometimes the process may cause you to feel overwhelmed. Take a minute to breathe deeply. OM ask a lot of us iin the process,, please know it is because you are that important and this work is that important. This is indeed part of the process of healing justice, personal and collective liberation. As Cara Page and Susan Raffo wrote in a healing justice document for the 2014 U.S. Social Forum, “We are choosing to define a healer as someone who works with both the individual body and the collective body towards shifting patterns that cause disconnection.” What We Do The firm provides facilitation, consultation and executive/leadership and community coaching as curators, architects and developers of capacity building for organizations, foundations, cities, communities and leaders to not only manage, but deeply engage with conflict, crisis and change. We approach our work as coaches and curators as healers (body workers) for the individual and the collective body, identifying the tension points that are causing disconnection and finding ways to release that energy in the service of system and self- transformation. Joi Unlimited has operated as a coaching and consulting firm specializing in crisis, conflict and change. We are now transitioning to a tech-enabled firm to further our mission and reach to put "healing in the hands of anyone, anywhere". We do our work grounded in our theoretical framework, the Orange Method of Radical Self-Care and Radical Hospitality as liberation for us all. We are transforming lives and healing communities. We are trusted facilitators and space holders between city enterprises, activists, community organizers, civic leadership and communities on such issues as racial justice, healing, safety beyond policing, trauma and public policy. Our Commitment to Make an Impact The Orange Method is a process for those most affected by structural inequality and those most committed to transforming those structures. We value those experiences and commitments as high intellectual, cultural and economic capital to fulfill a growing market need of skilled cultural brokers and interpreters of community, organizations, government, and private agency culture. Our team are experts in nuance and obvious matters in the same space. We draw from a broad network of local and global artist, healers, space holders, lightworkers, community organizers and leaders as partners to do this important work. Our coaches and consultants are called Orange Methodologist/OMies. Methodology: The Orange Method Application of the Orange Method 1. Meditations: Practices and tools on how to get grounded. 2. Mindfulness: Practices and tools on how to get present. 3. conscious Movement- practices and tools on how to get up/unstuck. 4. e-Motional liberation- practices and tools on how to get free from past and present toxic stress and trauma. Supporting Principles ● Creating a sense of belonging ● Understanding ACES and healing from trauma ● Racial justice reconciliation ● Circle as a critical praxis ● Narrative as liberatory pedagogy ● Self as instrument ● Community Cultural Wealth and Cultural Capital ● Building well and connected communities The Context We live in an ever-changing local and global community and workforce impacted by abundance, injustice, opportunities, and trauma all at once. Joi Unlimited works with visionary leaders, exhausted executives, healing communities, isolated transplants, hopeful humanitarians, seeking sojourners, and progressive organizations. Joi Unlimited’s niche is holding space for individuals in the context of community, government, corporate, faith- based and educational organizations, and we build connections across differences and navigate challenging situations in professional and personal journey. We believe people when they share they have experienced trauma and we believe that you can heal from it. At Joi Unlimited we partner with communities to assist institutions and organizations to build well-connected communities that honor multiple and intersecting identities while transforming systems. We support individuals and organizations who are transitioning to new (or changing) environments, positions, and experiences and understand that leadership has to be met with the life we live. We value individuals in the context of the collective community. We believe that mental and emotional challenges are not the fault of the individual but rather steeped in systems of oppression that manufactures trauma. We honor the healing power of emotional liberation grounded in the Orange Method. Should you want to work with Joi Unlimited as a potential partner or collaborator, please see our interest form below. If you have further interest in launching or participating in an OM Community Coach Cohort, please send us an e-mail and we can set up a time to discuss. Contact Information Joi Unlimited, Coaching and Consulting info@joiunlimited.com www.joiunlimited.com 651.564.4665 Interest form https://goo.gl/forms/wA75BYBdDNFNPS0s2 Dr. Joi Lewis, CEO and Founder “Dr. Joi” is the CEO and Founder of Joi Unlimited Coaching & Consulting www.joiunlimited.com and the Orange Method. Her work is deeply grounded in healing justice as a “body worker” of the collective body (systems) and individual bodies (self), holding space for discovering critical pressure points for transformation, particularly in terms of trauma. Dr. Joi completed her doctoral work at the University of Pennsylvania, was a Bush Fellow, conducted research in South Africa, had a 20-year career in higher education, and engaged in a year of radical self-care practice through yoga meditation and community healing circles. She is a social entrepreneur, facilitator, coach, healer, space holder, lightworker, yogi and “joy” instigator, who believes in interrupting her own oppressor patterns with loving kindness to have more access to humanity and encourages others to do the same. She recently launched the OM Community Coach Certification Program in Healing Justice. “Dr. Joi” uses the four principles of the Orange Method: Mindfulness, Meditation, conscious Movement, eMotional liberation, to hold space for transformation of systems and self. She offers her gifts of holding space, posing tough questions, inspiring accountability and the next right action. She encourages us to embrace the heartbreak and “joy” as we reach for more of our own humanity and each other’s. Dr. Joi helps us make connections across differences and navigate challenging and tense situations in professional and personal journeys. She offers a practice of Radical Self-Care to be "awake" that requires our ultimate health not just our ultimate sacrifice. She believes that when individuals, institutions and organizations “practice” compassion, loving kindness and radical self-care it becomes simple to do well and do good and build sustainable and reciprocal relationships in local and global communities. Appendix G Task Force Data Summary Appendix H Working Group Data Summary Appendix I Executive Leadership Team Data Summary Appendix J Edina Community Data Summary Appendix K Link to Online Survey Results The results of the online survey may be found here (insert link). In some instances, specific names were removed. Appendix L Survey of Demographics for City-Appointed Boards and Commissions Administration Department Edina’s Advisory Boards and Commissions Date: January 24, 2017 To: Mayor & City Council cc: Scott Neal, City Manager From: MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Subject: Board and Commission 2017 Diversity Survey The City conducted a demographic study of its current Board and Commission members. The intent was to use the data to better understand the demographics of who is serving and who is represented so the City can work towards a Board and Commission member base reflective of the community. The survey results may be available for consideration for other city initiatives. The report does not include any identifying data. The survey was sent to ninety-eight active 2017 Board and Commission members. Sixty-four members responded or there was a 65% response rate. Every survey question included a “prefer not to answer” option. The results of the survey have been provided to Council for review and consideration as the City conducts Board and Commission annual onboarding. Attached to this report is a portion of the 2017 Current Edina Demographics presentation provided by the Minnesota State Demographic Center. This presentation was provided to the Community Council in Edina. City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Edina Board and Commission Diversity Survey Q1 What Board or Commission do you currently serve on? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Arts and Culture... Board of Appeals and... Community Health... Construction Board of... Energy and Environment... Heritage Preservation... Human Rights and Relation... Parks and Recreation... Planning Commission Transportation Commission 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Arts and Culture Commission 15.63% 10 Board of Appeals and Equalization 4.69% 3 Community Health Commission 17.19% 11 Construction Board of Appeals 1.56% 1 Energy and Environment Commission 9.38% 6 Heritage Preservation Commission 6.25% 4 Human Rights and Relations Commission 17.19% 11 Parks and Recreation Commission 12.50% 8 Planning Commission 4.69% 3 Transportation Commission 10.94% 7 64 TOTAL Q2 What is your gender? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Female Male Prefer not to answer Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Female 54.69% 35 Male 45.31% 29 Prefer not to answer 0.00% 0 Other 0.00% 0 TOTAL 64 Q4 What ethnicity and/or race do you identify with? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 American Indian or... Asian or Pacific... Black or African... Hispanic or Latino White / Caucasian Two or More Races Prefer not to answer Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES American Indian or Alaskan Native 0.00% 0 Asian or Pacific Islander 7.81% 5 Black or African American 0.00% 0 Hispanic or Latino 1.56% 1 White / Caucasian 87.50% 56 Two or More Races 3.13% 2 Prefer not to answer 0.00% 0 Other (please specify) 0.00% 0 TOTAL 64 Q5 Do you identify as LGBTQ (Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Transgender or Queer)? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Yes No Prefer not to answer 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 9.38% 6 No 90.63% 58 Prefer not to answer 0.00% 0 TOTAL 64 Q6 Are you a person living with a disability? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Yes No Prefer not to answer 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 1.56% 1 No 98.44% 63 Prefer not to answer 0.00% 0 TOTAL 64 Q7 What is the highest level of education you have completed? Answered: 63 Skipped: 1 Did not attend school Graduated from high school Some College Associates Degree (2 year) Bachelors Degree (4 year) Some graduate school Completed graduate school Prefer not to answer 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Did not attend school 0.00% 0 Graduated from high school 4.76% 3 Some College 3.17% 2 Associates Degree (2 year) 1.59% 1 Bachelors Degree (4 year) 15.87% 10 Some graduate school 3.17% 2 Completed graduate school 63.49% 40 Prefer not to answer 7.94% 5 TOTAL 63 Q8 How long have you lived in Edina? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Q9 Do you rent or own the place where you live? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Own Rent Prefer not to answer Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Own 85.94% 55 Rent 3.13% 2 Prefer not to answer 3.13% 2 Other (please specify) 7.81% 5 TOTAL 64 Q10 Does your neighborhood have a City Recognized Neighborhood Association? Neighborhood Connections map can be viewed here. Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Yes No Not Sure 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 59.38% 38 No 26.56% 17 Not Sure 14.06% 9 TOTAL 64 Q11 What quadrant of the City do you reside in? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 North West North East South West South East Not sure 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES North West 18.75% 12 North East 37.50% 24 South West 21.88% 14 South East 15.63% 10 Not sure 6.25% 4 TOTAL 64 Q12 Where did you grow up? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Edina, MN Twin Cities metro area Outside of the metro area, ... Outside of Minnesota, b... Outside of the United States Prefer not to answer 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Edina, MN 18.75% 12 Twin Cities metro area 31.25% 20 Outside of the metro area, but in Minnesota 9.38% 6 Outside of Minnesota, but in the United States 39.06% 25 Outside of the United States 1.56% 1 Prefer not to answer 0.00% 0 64 TOTAL Q14 What is your approximate average income? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Less than $25,000 $25,000-$49,000 $50,000-$74,999 $75,000-$199,00 0 $200,000+ Prefer not to answer 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Less than $25,000 4.69% 3 $25,000-$49,000 1.56% 1 $50,000-$74,999 6.25% 4 $75,000-$199,000 35.94% 23 $200,000+ 35.94% 23 Prefer not to answer 15.63% 10 TOTAL 64 Q15 What religion are you affiliated with? Answered: 64 Skipped: 0 Christian Muslim Jewish Buddhist Hindu Unaffiliated (No religiou... Prefer not to answer Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Christian 56.25% 36 Muslim 0.00% 0 Jewish 9.38% 6 Buddhist 0.00% 0 Hindu 6.25% 4 Unaffiliated (No religious identification) 28.13% 18 Prefer not to answer 0.00% 0 Other (please specify) 0.00% 0 TOTAL 64 Appendix M Findings Outside of City Government Scope Experiences, Observations, and Awareness of Race-Based The following includes themes and data from community members about experiences and input that reach beyond the Edina City government. Outside City Government Scope 1. Public Schools There are various concerns about the Edina Public School system, including race-based discrimination, reverse racism, and frustrations with academics and administration. Additionally, there is an overall frustration with the perceived decline of the school system’s academic performance. Input from community: Several examples of race-based discrimination between students, as well as examples described by community members as reverse racism from teachers and administrators surfaced, largely within the online survey. • A Task Force member mentioned that teachers tend to react more and discipline more harshly the “aggressive” boys of color and are less forgiving, while it seems that many equally aggressive white kids are treated more favorably. Disciplinary consequences for students seem to sometimes be inequitable. An example of a fight that involved two girls: an African-American girl and a white girl. Only the African-American girl was suspended. • A survey respondent noted, “The entire Edina Public School system is shaming white people with the "white privilege" curriculum. I don't understand how you teach tolerance through racism.” • A survey respondent mentioned, “My kids left Edina PS because of being told they were bad because they have white skin. I pulled my kids out entirely. Decline in quality of schools and curriculum drove us out, insane focus on ideology instead of core curriculum and math, reading, classics, etc.” • A community member showed frustration in the online survey, “My child has been bullied by two children of color for three years, and the elementary principal is not proactive nor does she protect my child. My child has been punched—punched!—twice at school, and the response we get is: “The parents of the [aggressor/bully] are not responsive.” Why aren’t these kids suspended from the bus when they tell the bus driver to “eff off”? Why don’t they have to apologize when they beat my child?” • A survey respondent said, “When we are more concerned about how we treat those that choose to enroll in our schools thru open enrollment vs the majority of our taxpaying citizens, we have an issue.” 2. Real Estate Some feel that realtors are contributing to the lack of racial diversity within the community by acting as “gate keepers.” Input from community: • A realtor told a Task Force member of color [when they were searching for a home] that they would not feel comfortable in the Indian Hills area of Edina, which also happened to be where the realtor lived. • A Task Force member tried buying a home in Edina but after losing to two legitimate bids and also being told by realtors they would not belong, they decided to rent. • During a small group community conversation, a community member noted having experienced housing discrimination in attempting to purchase a home, and subsequently filed a complaint with the U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 3. Neighborhoods Some people of color feel uneasy and insecure when walking around certain neighborhoods at night in fear of being followed by the police. Additionally, experiences were cited where the police were called by white community members that felt uncomfortable with their presence. Input from community: • When walking in the neighborhood, a Task Force member is careful to bring their license with them to prove they live in Edina. Their spouse does the same. • From the large group community gatherings, many black men shared feeling uncomfortable walking alone in Edina neighborhoods. • It was mentioned in the large community gatherings that neighbors call police for ‘suspicious behavior’ of people of color in their neighborhoods. 4. Athletic Associations Perceptions exist that athletic associations intentionally limit the involvement of community members of color. Most athletic associations host events at either city facilities or within the public schools. Input from community: • It was mentioned by an Executive Leadership Team member that last winter, an athletic association was accused of discrimination when a basketball team from North Minneapolis was deemed ineligible from participating in a tournament at Edina High School because their team certification had been revoked for previous conduct. • An Executive Leadership Team Member feels as though athletic associations limit inclusiveness through cost prohibitive fees that are charged to participate on traveling sports teams. • In the survey, a community member shared, “I don't feel welcomed by Edina sports associations.” • In a large community gathering, a participant noted that their kid’s youth sporting events do not give them a sense of belonging. • A Task Force member mentioned that they feel there are unsaid rules. They described a time when they were signing up their daughter up for Powder Puff football. After registering and paying for it, they were told it was already full. The Task Force member then questioned why the system would allow them to register and pay for it if it was in fact full. The program said they would make an exception. The Task Force member explained that they do not like being an exception to the rules. They just want the rules to be clear so they can follow them like everyone else. He did not like how this process seemed opaque and not transparent. Race-based Discrimination Between Community Members 1. Cultural Insensitivity There is an overall sense that Edina community members are insensitive to non-white cultures. This is seen from the general community, but also by city staff members. Input from community: • A community member shared in a small group gathering that they had heard biased comments at the Edina Art Center. “People coming from developing countries do not have etiquette about cleaning their household.” • A small group community gathering member stated that Edina residents are ignorant about non-white cultures. • A strong finalist for a city government position met qualifications and was noted by a selection committee member, a member of city staff, as not having good enough eye contact. An Executive Leadership Team member thought this was due cultural differences in eye contact and tried to explain it to the hiring committee. • A Working Group member noted that they often educate and explain cultural differences noting that some race-based behavior stems from fear/mistrust from lack of information. 2. Racial Slurs People have heard racial slurs or have had racial slurs directed at them in Edina. Input from community: • The young child of a Working Group member brushed against a car in a parking lot and the car owner yelled the n-word at her. • Large group community gathering members noted that racist comments and slurs are often heard by white community members from white community members. • A Task Force member mentioned examples of slurs via Facebook, such as use of pictures, the use of KKK, N-word, and phrases like “Muslims should go back.” • A Task Force member shared that their a teacher read aloud a story in their daughter’s class that had offensive words such as the N-word. She was upset that the teacher read out loud each word in front of the class. • An online survey participant shared, “Saw a Caucasian man I would estimate in his 50’s made several racist statements after I walked by him with my son in Jerry’s Foods. I wanted to confront him, but I was with my son. I also thought why risk everything I worked so hard for because this racist is spewing out his venom.” • One online survey respondent noted, “Edina YCC [Young Conservative Club] at Edina High School has said very racist things towards the students of color.” 3. Micro-aggressions Instances of indirect, subtle, or unintentional discrimination against people of color in the community have been experienced in Edina. Input from community: • An Executive Leadership Team member responded that most instances of race-based discrimination are indirect and does not believe come with ill intentions. • A Task Force member of color mentioned a situation at a restaurant when someone made an accusation that they took $20 when they had not. • Large group community gathering participants shared that micro-aggressions are common in the workplace. • A small group community gathering member saw a white parent pull their kid closer to them when an African-American was walking by. • An Executive Leadership Team member mentioned that during a conversation to create the city’s “Vision of Edina” strategic plan, a white man stood up in a group of 100 people and said that the reason he moved and chose to live in Edina was so that he would be living in a white community. 4. Otherness Many do not feel welcome or feel a sense of belonging based on the Edina cultural norm that people who differ from the Edina status quo do not belong in the community. This is not bound to just race, but also socioeconomic status and being native to Edina. Input from community: • One survey respondent shared, “There is an overall sense of, You are OTHER. I will be polite and let you sit, but the truth is you don't belong at our lunch table." • An Executive Leadership Team member hears things from residents like, “they look like they don’t belong.” • An online survey respondent stated, “There is discrimination between the haves and supposedly have nots, and the generational Edina people and new ones.” • A community member expressed on the online survey, “I think there is a certain population in Edina that does not like diversity, people who are different and think differently as a result and are very intolerant. Also a large portion of these people also seem to feel entitled and above everyone else because they live in Edina. Edina is very “cliquey.” • An online respondent mentioned, “I also have always been distinctly uncomfortable with the overall whiteness here after experiencing a much more diverse population in my early life. That has never changed. Things are much better than when I first came here and there are many things I have come to love and respect in Minnesota but I will never get used to the overall pervasive feeling I get in Edina of the importance of economic advantage and white privilege.” 5. Reactions Towards Inter-Racial Families Bi-racial families hear insensitive comments and receive questions about how their family members are related, which leaves them with a feeling of discomfort and contribute to not belonging. Input from community: • The spouse of a Working Group member, who is white, has been asked if their children are foster kids. • A community member shared in the survey, “I look racially ambiguous, but my children do not. I am welcomed until people see my child and suddenly I’m held at arm’s length.” • A survey respondent shared, “My bi-racial daughters have been questioned by community members and children about being adopted, questioned about what they and about their hair constantly touched.” 6. Insensitivity to Racial Equity Some white Edina citizens reported having little sympathy toward the experiences of community members of colors. There are also participants of color who felt that their white community members care little about their negative experience in the community. Input from community: • An Executive Leadership Team member mentioned that while they did raise their hand to serve as part of the initiative, they did not see it as a high priority. • The same Executive Leadership Team member mentioned a couple of times that the issue of racial equity does not bring about a lot of emotions for them like it does others. • A survey participant shared, “Stop persecuting white people. Do not make us feel demised. We are not the reason for other races problems.” • An Executive Leadership Team member shared that they were extremely uncomfortable when the Black Lives Matter group showed up to the Council meeting after the October 14th incident. They did not like that the Mayor and City Council allowed the group to take as much time as they did at the meeting, as this was not normal protocol. • One survey respondent shared, “You’re trying to fix something that isn’t a problem.” Appendix N Facilities Working Group Assessment Tool Appendix O 2017 Edina Quality of Life Survey Responses in the following table show only the proportion of respondents giving a certain answer; for example, the percent of respondents “excellent” or “good.” ANOVA and chi-square tests of significance were applied to these comparisons of survey questions. A “p-value” of 0.05 a 5% probability that differences observed between subgroups are due to chance; or in other words, a greater than 95% probability that the differences were statistically significant, they have been shaded grey. Quality of Life by Respondent Characteristics How would you rate the quality of life in Edina? (Percent "excellent" or "good") Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race How would you rate the quality of life in Edina? 97% 98% 97% General Community Characteristics by Respondent Characteristics following characteristics as they relate to Edina as a community: (Percent "excellent" or "good") Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Overall feeling of safety in Edina 96% 98% 97% Overall ease of getting to the places you usually have to visit 86% 90% 87% Quality of overall natural environment in Edina 87% 95% 88% Overall established “built environment” of Edina (including overall design, buildings, parks and transportation systems) 83% 78% 82% Health and wellness opportunities in Edina 93% 91% 92% Overall opportunities for education and enrichment 95% 95% 95% Overall economic health of Edina 96% 91% 95% Sense of community 76% 59% 74% Overall image or reputation of Edina 87% 84% 87% Neighborliness of residents in Edina 75% 76% 75% Likelihood of Recommending or Remaining in Edina by Respondent Characteristics unlikely you are to do each of the following: (Percent "very" or "somewhat" likely) Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Recommend living in Edina to someone who asks 97% 93% 96% Remain in Edina for the next five years 96% 76% 94% Feelings of Safety by Respondent Characteristics Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel: (Percent "very" or "somewhat" safe) Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race In your neighborhood 98% 100% 98% In the 50th & France area (downtown area) 97% 91% 96% In the Southdale area 76% 89% 77% Specific Community Characteristics by Respondent Characteristics following characteristics as they relate to Edina as a whole: (Percent "excellent" or "good") Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Traffic flow on major streets 63% 78% 63% Ease of public parking 73% 72% 72% Ease of travel by car in Edina 83% 89% 82% Ease of travel by public transportation in Edina 37% 50% 40% Ease of travel by bicycle in Edina 50% 55% 49% Ease of walking in Edina 68% 65% 66% Availability of paths and walking trails 60% 61% 60% Air quality 89% 82% 88% Cleanliness of Edina 93% 91% 91% Public places where people want to spend time 84% 77% 82% Variety of housing options 57% 49% 55% Availability of affordable quality housing 40% 21% 37% Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) 79% 62% 75% Recreational opportunities 84% 72% 82% K-12 education 96% 97% 96% Adult educational opportunities 90% 81% 89% Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities 81% 80% 80% Employment opportunities 67% 69% 69% Shopping opportunities 93% 89% 91% Cost of living in Edina 50% 31% 47% Overall quality of business and service establishments in Edina 92% 91% 90% Overall quality of commercial redevelopment in Edina 76% 68% 72% Overall quality of residential redevelopment in Edina 66% 76% 67% Opportunities to participate in social events and activities 75% 63% 73% Opportunities to volunteer 82% 63% 79% Opportunities to participate in community matters 78% 67% 75% Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds 46% 56% 46% Importance of Diversity-Inclusive Programs by Respondent Characteristics How important, if at all, do you Race/ethnicity think it is for the City to implement each of the White alone, not Hispanic and/or following? Hispanic other race Overall Expand the types of cultural events that are offered within the community 45% 58% 46% Enhance the promotion and awareness of cultural events that take place in the community 52% 54% 53% Provide educational opportunities to learn about different cultures and customs locally and around the world 48% 52% 48% Promote and provide opportunities for diverse representation in local leadership, advisory and policy making roles 55% 67% 57% Use of Parks and Recreation Amenities by Respondent Characteristics In the last 12 months, about how many times, if ever, have you or other household members used any of the following Edina Parks & Recreation Department amenities? Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Trails 80% 81% 80% Neighborhood parks 90% 89% 89% Large community athletic fields 50% 51% 49% Edinborough Park 46% 59% 48% Centennial Lakes Park 75% 75% 75% Edina Aquatic Center 29% 28% 28% Edina Senior Center 21% 12% 20% Braemar Arena (ice arena) 25% 25% 24% Edina Art Center 28% 27% 28% Braemar Golf Course 35% 17% 32% Braemar Golf Dome 22% 15% 20% Braemar Field (sports dome) 25% 20% 24% Quality of Parks and Recreation Amenities by Respondent Characteristics following Edina Parks & Recreation Department amenities: (Percent "excellent" or "good") Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Trails 81% 89% 81% Neighborhood parks 88% 92% 88% Large community athletic fields 92% 92% 92% Edinborough Park 90% 93% 91% Centennial Lakes Park 95% 99% 95% Edina Aquatic Center 88% 77% 88% Edina Senior Center 88% 96% 89% Braemar Arena (ice arena) 90% 80% 90% Edina Art Center 86% 89% 86% Braemar Golf Course 84% 100% 85% Braemar Golf Dome 92% 100% 92% Braemar Field (sports dome) 93% 100% 93% Quality of Services by Respondent Characteristics Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Edina: (Percent "excellent" or "good") Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Police services 89% 89% 89% Fire services 99% 100% 99% Ambulance or emergency medical services 99% 100% 99% Crime prevention 88% 85% 86% Fire prevention and education 94% 90% 91% Traffic enforcement 77% 87% 77% Street repair 56% 51% 54% Street cleaning 82% 79% 80% Street lighting 70% 74% 70% Snow removal 94% 78% 92% Sidewalk maintenance 79% 62% 75% Traffic signal timing 70% 81% 70% Bus or transit services 55% 52% 54% Garbage collection 88% 79% 86% Recycling 87% 81% 86% Yard waste pick-up 84% 82% 83% Storm drainage 83% 69% 80% Drinking water 70% 61% 68% Sewer services 91% 85% 88% Utility billing 82% 68% 79% City parks 91% 98% 91% Park maintenance 91% 88% 90% Condition of trails and sidewalks 86% 87% 84% Recreation programs or classes 88% 81% 87% Recreation centers or facilities 88% 91% 86% Land use, planning and zoning 60% 71% 60% Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) 68% 70% 67% Animal control 85% 83% 84% Economic development 81% 78% 79% Public health services 88% 84% 86% Public information services/communication from the City 79% 82% 78% Cable television 61% 67% 60% Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) 82% 81% 80% Edina open space 69% 72% 68% City-sponsored special events 78% 74% 77% Overall quality of services provided by the City of Edina 89% 95% 89% Opinions of Property Taxes by Respondent Characteristics Thinking about your property taxes in comparison with neighboring cities, do you consider property taxes in Edina to be…? (Percent "very" or "somewhat" high) Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Thinking about your property taxes in comparison with neighboring cities, do you consider property taxes in Edina to be…? 58% 76% 58% Level of Support for Increasing Property Taxes by Respondent Characteristics support or oppose an increase in your property taxes to maintain City services at their current level? (Percent "strongly" or "somewhat" support) Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race To what extent would you support or oppose an increase in your property taxes to maintain City services at their current level? 45% 42% 44% Government Performance by Respondent Characteristics Please rate the following categories of Edina government performance: (Percent "excellent" or "good") Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race The value of services for the taxes paid to Edina 83% 66% 81% The job Edina government does at welcoming resident involvement 65% 48% 61% Overall confidence in Edina government 72% 67% 69% Generally acting in the best interest of the community 71% 66% 69% Treating all residents fairly 72% 61% 69% Managing Community Tensions by Respondent Characteristics Problems in Edina by Respondent Characteristics Please rate how much of a problem, if at all, you feel each of the following is in Edina. (Percent "not a problem" or "minor problem") Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Traffic speeding in your neighborhood 44% 27% 42% Stop sign violations in your neighborhood 26% 12% 27% Violent crime 3% 0% 3% Drugs 15% 4% 15% Youth crimes 11% 5% 11% Vandalism and property crimes 18% 16% 19% Identity theft 24% 13% 23% Domestic abuse 17% 7% 16% How well, if at all, do you feel the City is managing tensions in the community related to residential redevelopment in Edina? (Percent "very" or "somewhat" well) Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race How well, if at all, do you feel the City is managing tensions in the community related to residential redevelopment in Edina? 71% 63% 68% Methods of Garbage Collection by Respondent Characteristics Most communities have one of two systems for garbage collection. To what extent do you support the City changing from the current system in which residents may choose from several different haulers to a system where the City chooses one hauler for the whole community? (Percent "strongly" or "somewhat" support) White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Overall Most communities have one of two systems for garbage collection. To what extent do you support the City changing from the current system in which residents may choose from several different haulers to a system where the City chooses one hauler for the whol 47% 72% 49% Aspects of Drinking Water by Respondent Characteristics Please rate the following aspects of drinking water in Edina: (Percent "excellent" or "good") Race/ethnicity Overall White alone, not Hispanic Hispanic and/or other race Appearance 87% 71% 85% Taste 65% 51% 63% Odor 75% 51% 72% Hardness 36% 39% 36% Reliability 89% 76% 87% Safety 85% 68% 83% Race/ethnicity Appendix P Next Steps After Final Report Appendix Q Glossary The following includes relevant terminology and acronym definitions that can be found throughout the report. CIP: Capitol Improvement Plan CTS: Communication and Technology Services GARE: Government Alliance on Race and Equity (see appendix E) PACS Fund: Pedestrian and Cycling Safety Fund PD: Police Department People of Color: a person who is not white or of European parentage. Community Members of Color: a community member who is not white or of European parentage. Race: a grouping of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into categories generally viewed as inherently distinct by society. Race and Equity Lens: when those most impacted by structural racial inequity are meaningfully involved in the creation and implementation of the institutional policies and practices that impact their lives. Race-based Discrimination: treating someone unfavorably due to the color of their skin or a characteristic of their race. Racial Equity: the condition that would be achieved if one's racial identity no longer predicted, in a statistical sense, how one fares. Section 3 Housing: guarantee that the employment and other economic opportunities created by Federal financial assistance for housing and community development programs should, if possible, be directed toward low- and very- low income persons, particularly those who are recipients of government assistance for housing. Section 8 Housing: authorizes the payment of rental housing assistance to private landlords on behalf of low-income households. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:O rdinanc e No. 2018-09, R esolution Nos. 2018-47 & 2018-48; C omprehens ive P lan Amendment & P reliminary R ezoning with P reliminary Development P lan for F rance Equities LLC , 7250 F ranc e Avenue Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2018-09 creating P U D District 15. (first reading) Approve R esolution No. 2018-47 C omprehensive P lan Amendment. Approve R esolution No. 2018-48 P reliminary Rezoning and P reliminary Development P lan. I N TR O D U C TI O N: On April 25, 2018, the P lanning Commission recommended approval of both the C omprehensive P lan Amendment and P reliminary R ezoning. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 N ay. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Planning Commission Staff Report Resolution No. 2018-47 Resolution No. 2018-48 Ordinance No. 2018-09 Site Location, Sketch Plan & AFO Review (2 Reviews) & Engineering Staff Review Applicant Narrative Proposed Plans Traffic Study Greater Southdale Area Traffic Study April 25, 2018 Planning Commis s ion Minutes Petition Received 2018-05-15 During Meeting April 25, 2018 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, & Preliminary Development Plan for 7250 France Avenue. Information / Background: The applicant, France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68 acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. As proposed the development would include the following: A 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135 unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. Twenty percent (20%) of the unit area would be for affordable housing, which exceeds the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Retail & Office space totaling 19,000 square feet. Thirty-five (35) surface parking spaces for the retail use. Sustainability. LEED or Green Globe designation would be pursued. Pedestrian and vehicular access is proposed to the lot to the north (7200 France). Amenity terrace including a pool. Primary vehicle access points would be off France Avenue and Gallagher Drive. This access road would also serve the 7200 France site to the north to reduce traffic on 72nd, as has been recommended in previous development proposals for that site. The applicant has gone through the sketch plan process, and the Greater Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson of AFO, Architecture Field Office has provided a STAFF REPORT Page 2 review as well. The applicant has responded to the development principles, AFO’s comments, and feedback received from the sketch plan, and has revised the plans as follows: Increased the Setback on France Avenue to 50 Feet at the base, retaining podium set back of approximately 10 more feet at floors 2-6 on the majority of the façade. Increased setback at rear property (west side) to bring access street out from under the building. Incorporated a walkway on the west side adjacent to the building and maintained the landscape buffer to the west. Build steps down along the west side to 5 stories with a setback at the 6th floor. Overall project size is approximately 8% smaller than the previous iteration. From 2.36 FAR to 2.18. North and west facades have greater development and improved pedestrian realm experience. Increased green roof area at 2nd floor plaza roof. AFO has reviewed the revised plans (See attached memo) and offered the following: The building is now a “four-sided” building, whereby all four facades are treated as primary. The building’s relationship to the woonerf on the west side of the site is vastly improved, in that the drive is no longer underneath the building. The pedestrian pattern seems appropriate and thought out. The woonerfs on the west and north are pedestrian friendly, suggesting use by pedestrians first, bikes second, cars third and service vehicles fourth. The public realm design, including the variety in paving and landscaping depicted in the renderings reinforces the pedestrian experience. The scale and treatment of the public realm/pedestrian experience along France and Gallagher is open and flexible. The building’s northwest corner is better scaled in relation to the adjacent three story buildings. To accommodate the request the following is required: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and A Rezoning from POD-1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone, meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has complete discretion when reviewing this application. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided OR, Office Residential. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Easterly: Macy’s Home Store; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Southerly: Office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided OR, Office Residential. Westerly: Apartments; zoned PRD, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.68 acres in size, contains an existing 4-story office building and parking ramp. The parking ramp is in an extremely poor condition. Planning Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential. Zoning: POD, Planned Office District Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1311, 1.25 fully enclosed spaces and .75 surface spaces are required per dwelling unit. (2 spaces per unit.) Therefore, the 135 unit apartment would require 270 parking spaces. The19,000 square feet of retail/office would require 76 spaces (4 spaces per 1,000 s.f.). Therefore, 346 spaces are required between the two uses. The project would provide 320 parking stalls, 285 of which would be underground, and 35 on level one. Wenck Associates conducted a parking study and determined that the proposed parking spaces would be adequate for the development. (See attached study.) The study assumed a 4,000 square foot restaurant within the retail space. Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Primary access to the proposed development would be off Gallagher Drive. A right in and right out is proposed off France Avenue. This access would have to be approved by Hennepin County, as France Avenue is a County Road. The County has provided a preliminary review and found they would not grant the access. The spacing between adjacent intersections/driveways would not be adequate. Future access is proposed to the 7200 France property to the north; this would reduce traffic on 72nd Street, which was required as part of a previous development proposal for the 7200 France site. This access road would also serve the 7200 France site to the north to reduce traffic on 72nd, as has been recommended in previous development proposals for that site. To ensure that this access is available to the property to the north, staff would recommend that an access easement be provided over these drive aisles along the west and north lot lines. Wenck Consulting also conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project. The level of service at adjacent intersections would not be impacted, even if the County does not allow the right-in and right out on France. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 27 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans show that 55 trees would be planted. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are also proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. A site improvement plan agreement would be required to outline public vs. private responsibilities and ownership for private improvement on public property. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination of stucco, architectural metal panels, stone, and glass, with metal panel accents. The applicant will have a materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading area and trash enclosures would be on the inside of the building/parking ramp. Shadow Study As requested at sketch plan, the applicant completed a shadow study to determine impacts the height of the buildings might have. As demonstrated, the biggest impact would be in the winter months. Building Height The building height requirement for this site is 4 stories and 48 feet. (See attached building height overlay district map.) The applicant is requesting flexibility from this standard through the PUD rezoning. Additionally, the City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 90 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 360- STAFF REPORT Page 5 foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 520 feet, therefore would be code compliant. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The proposal to add 135 units of housing on France Avenue with extensive pedestrian walkway opportunities around the entire perimeter of the site would enhance the pedestrian experience in the area. The plans are consistent with the vision document for the Greater Southdale Area by providing a 50 foot setback on France and 30 feet on Gallagher Drive. There would be dedicated bike storage and a bike maintenance area on the first level of the project. STAFF REPORT Page 6 COMPLIANCE TABLE While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the underlying zoning: *Not code compliant Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment – Density To accommodate the request, the following Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. The Office Residential area is located west of France Avenue and into the Pentagon Park Area. The OR, Office Residential Area allows up to 30 units per acre. This density is low given the density that has been considered as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study. Densities that have been contemplated to date have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. The thinking behind that density has been to allow greater densities in between France and York (100- 125 units per acre; the CAC, Community Activity Center allows up to 105 units per acre in the existing Comprehensive Plan); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per City Standard (POD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – France Front – Gallagher Side – North Rear – West 90 feet (based on height) 80 feet (based on height) 80 feet (based on height) 80 feet based on height Four times the height from R-1 for 7 story building = 320 (based on 80 feet) 30-40 feet* (50 feet to curb) 30 & 55 feet* 35-40 feet* 20 feet* 400 feet Building Height Four stories and 48 feet 7 stories and 90 feet* Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .50% 2.2%* Parking Stalls 270 enclosed (residential) 76 surface spaces Council may require surface stalls if deemed necessary. 320 enclosed total 35 surface* Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ STAFF REPORT Page 7 acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. Below is table of existing high density developments in the City. Note that the trend in multi- family development is higher density. This is due to the high cost of land in Edina, the City’s requirement for affordable housing, and the added cost of redeveloping a site with existing buildings. High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 6500 France – Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar - Onyx 6725 York 240 52 7250 France Project 7250 France 135 80 5000 France 5000 France 23 29 Hazelton Road Apartments 3650 Hazelton Road 186 150 Bus Garage – Trammel Crow Eden Avenue 165 100 The Collaborative Market Street 131 46 Gateway Point 66th & York 191 96 The Millennium 66th & York 372 60 Lincoln Residences 5901 Lincoln Drive 250 30 Red – Indicates recent projects STAFF REPORT Page 8 Example Residential Density Ranges in Surrounding City’s Comprehensive Plans City Range – Per Acre Bloomington Medium Density Residential 5-10 High Density Residential No limit General Business 0-83 Commercial (Community & Regional) 0-83 High Intense mix use 0-60 Airport South mix use 30-131 Richfield Medium Density Residential 7-12 High Density Residential Minimum of 24 High Density Res./Office Minimum of 24 Mixed Use 50+ St. Louis Park Medium Density Residential 6-30 High Density Residential 20-75 (PUD for high end) Mixed Use 20-75 (PUD for high end) Commercial 20-50 Minnetonka Medium Density Residential 4-12 High Density Residential 12+ Mixed Use No range established (density based on site location and site conditions.) Minneapolis Medium Density (mixed use) 20-50 High Density (mixed use) 50-120 Very High Density(mixed use) 120+ The site’s location on an arterial roadway provides a good location for higher density. The Comprehensive Plan currently suggests allowing higher density subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. The proposed project would contain most of these elements. There is adequate utility capacity available. A traffic study was done by Wenck Associates and concludes that there would be minimal impact to the roads, and the existing roads could support the development. (See attached study.) Additionally, WSB did a traffic study of the entire Southdale area and contemplated densities higher than proposed. (See attached study.) STAFF REPORT Page 9 Underground parking would be included; the at-grade parking lot would be behind the retail/office uses on the street; open space/public area is provided along the street fronts and the pedestrian and vehicle access along the north and west lot lines. Affordable housing is proposed to exceed the City of Edina policy by providing 20% of the units as affordable. The trade-off in allowing more height and density includes: A more creative site plan with improved site circulation and public space; Collaborative design with parcel to the north (7200 France). The plans allow access for the 7200 parcel to take traffic to be away from 72nd and the low density residential area to the north and west; Underground and hidden parking; Improved pedestrian and vehicle access and connections; Significant affordable housing provided within the development; Pedestrian and bicycle oriented design would include bike and pedestrian paths through the site to connect to the north and along France and Gallagher. The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be accomplished as follows: OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The City Council may approve a project for up to 80 units per acre through a PUD rezoning. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, underground parking, provision of affordable housing, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code: maximum of 0.5 to 1.0 Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. STAFF REPORT Page 10 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most all of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Office Residential” which allows for retail, office and housing. The proposal is a high quality residential development that would enhance the surrounding area and add pedestrian activity to the STAFF REPORT Page 11 area with housing on France Avenue. The proposed buildings would be a high quality architectural metal, stone and glass. The proposal would exceed the City’s affordable housing policy to help provide additional affordable housing within the City. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed uses are all consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as OR, Office Residential, which encourages a mixture of uses. Uses include: Offices, attached or multifamily housing. Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; This project would be a true mixed use development with residential, retail and office uses. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned, the proposal includes vertical mixed uses. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As mentioned, the uses allowed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The densities contemplated are consist with discussions by the Greater Southdale Area Visioning. Additionally, the Wenck Traffic study concludes that the surrounding roadways could support the use. STAFF REPORT Page 12 iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The table on page 6 shows how the proposed new buildings would comply with the POD Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in the new PUD-15 District. Flexibility is requested in regard to building height, setbacks, FAR and parking standard. In relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The area would be vastly improved from existing conditions on the site. The blighted parking ramp would be removed. The provision of housing on France Avenue would increase pedestrian activity on France Avenue. The use will bring more vibrancy to the area with a true mixed use project. The applicant is providing a significant contribution to affordable housing, by providing twenty percent of the units within the project for affordable housing, double the City’s policy. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed amendment is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I- 494. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. STAFF REPORT Page 13 5. Traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. • Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site? Yes. Staff believes the PUD is justified for the following reasons: 1. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Public art; and Significant affordable housing within the project. 2. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. STAFF REPORT Page 14 f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. (See pages 10-12 of this report.) In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Creates a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 4. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 90 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 360-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 520 feet, therefore would be code compliant. 5. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Associates conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. STAFF REPORT Page 15 Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District in the Greater Southdale Area from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I- 494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 5. The traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for 7250 France Avenue. Approval is subject to the following findings: STAFF REPORT Page 16 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass, designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Public art; and Significant affordable housing within the project. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. v. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. STAFF REPORT Page 17 vi. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. vii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. viii. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 90 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 360-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 520 feet, therefore would be code compliant. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 8. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 9. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 28, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. STAFF REPORT Page 18 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Of the proposed housing units, 20% must be dedicated for affordable housing and meet the conditions of the City’s affordable housing policy. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 18, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Wenck Associates Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. 13. Dedication of public access easements along the west and north lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the property to the north, 7200 France Avenue. Deadline for a city decision: June 19, 2018 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING DENSITY IN THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68 acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. 1.02 The proposal is to build a 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135-unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 1.04 On April 25, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.05 On May 15, 2018, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: Table 4.3. Future Land Use Categories is amended as follows: OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The City Council may approve a project for up to 80 units per acre through a PUD rezoning. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, underground parking, provision of affordable housing, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code: RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 Page 2 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50- 80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 5. The traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. maximum of 0.5 to 1.0 Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 Page 3 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT TO PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 15, INCLUDING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7250 LLC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68 acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. As proposed the development would include the following: A 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135 unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. Twenty percent (20%) of the unit area would be for affordable housing, which exceeds the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Retail & Office space totaling 19,000 square feet. Thirty-five (35) surface parking spaces for the retail use. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 44 Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following is required: A Rezoning from Pod, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development 1.04 On April 25, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requests. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.05 On May 15, the City Council had a public hearing and considered the requests. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass, designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 Page 2 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Public art; and Significant affordable housing within the project. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 Page 3 6. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 90 feet in the seven-story portion of the building; therefore a 360-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 520 feet, therefore would be code compliant. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenk conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 8. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 9. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from POD-1, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for the 7250 France Avenue Development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 28, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 Page 4 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Of the proposed housing units, 20% must be dedicated for affordable housing and meet the conditions of the City’s affordable housing policy. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 18, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Wenck Associates Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. 13. Dedication of public access easements along the west and north lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the property to the north, 7200 France Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 Page 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on May 15, 2018. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION MAY 15, 2018 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-15 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-15 (PUD-15) (a) Legal description: Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition, Hennepin County. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on _________, 2018 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2018-___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD-2 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Required Building Setbacks Front – France Side – Gallagher Side – North Rear – West 30-40 feet 30-55 feet 35-40 feet 20 feet Building Height 7 stories and 90 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2.5% Parking Stalls 320 stall Parking Stall Size 8.5 x 18’ Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 2 (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD Zoning District. (h) Twenty percent (20%) of the dwelling units in the building shall be dedicated for affordable housing for a minimum of 15 years from the date of certificate of occupancy. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: May 15, 2018 Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk WENCK File #3022-09 April 2, 2018 Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic Impact Study for 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN April 2018 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................................... 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES............................................ 4-4 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................. 5-5 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................... 5-6 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: April 2, 2018 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 April 2018 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new residential and retail/office development located at 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northwest corner of the France Avenue/Gallagher Drive intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by an office building and parking structure. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue/Hazelton Road • France Avenue/72nd Street • France Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/proposed access • Gallagher Drive/proposed access The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office building and constructing a new residential and retail/office building. The project includes 316 on-site parking spaces. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2019. As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on both Gallagher Drive and France Avenue. The access on Gallagher Drive is a full movement access. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. In order to account for concerns expressed by Hennepin County, the study also includes analysis of an alternative with access provided solely on Gallagher Drive. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 33 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 65 net trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 931 net weekday daily trips. • Traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at the intersections analyzed to accommodate the proposed project. • From a traffic operations perspective, both access options result in minimal impacts to operations on France Avenue. The option with all access on Gallagher Drive results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher access location, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. • France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines April 2018 1-2 and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. From these comments it appears Hennepin County will likely not allow access on France Avenue. • The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on pedestrian and bicycle operations in this area. The number of trips generated by the proposed project has minimal impact on operations at the nearby intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle operations. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. April 2018 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new residential and retail/office development located at 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northwest corner of the France Avenue/Gallagher Drive intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by an office building and parking structure. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue/Hazelton Road • France Avenue/72nd Street • France Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/proposed access • Gallagher Drive/proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office building and constructing a new residential and retail/office building. The project includes 316 on-site parking spaces. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2019. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The proposed land uses and sizes are shown in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Proposed Land Uses and Sizes Land Use Size Unit Apartments 135 DU Sit-down restaurant 4,000 SF General retail 7,000 SF Office 8,000 SF SF = square feet, DU = dwelling units As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on both Gallagher Drive and France Avenue. The access on Gallagher Drive is a full movement access. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. In order to account for these concerns, the study also includes analysis of a n alternative with access provided solely on Gallagher Drive. April 2018 2-2 April 2018 2-3 April 2018 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site is currently occupied by an office building and parking structure. The site is bounded by France Avenue to the east, Gallagher Drive to the south, office uses to the north, and residential areas to the west. Near the site location, France Avenue is a six-lane divided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. Gallagher Drive is a two-lane roadway. Existing conditions at intersections near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. France Avenue/Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach proves one left turn and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. France Avenue/72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound 72nd Street approach. The eastbound approach provides one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and three through lanes. The southbound approach provides two through lanes and one through/right turn lane. Left turns are not allowed from 72nd Street onto France Avenue. France Avenue/Gallagher Drive (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach proves one left turn and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound Gallagher Drive approach. All approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. Turn movement data for the intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in March 2018. April 2018 3-2 April 2018 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2020. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2018 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses currently on the site. • 2020 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2020 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth in the area. • 2020 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2020 No-Build volumes to determine 2020 Build volumes. In addition, existing trips generated by the uses currently on the site were subtracted from the total volume. Trip Generation Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trips generated by the existing uses were based on the traffic count data. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed Project Apartments 135 DU 13 36 49 36 23 59 734 Office 8,000 SF 8 1 9 1 8 9 78 Restaurant 4,000 SF 22 18 40 24 15 39 449 General Retail 7,000 SF 4 3 7 13 14 27 264 Existing Uses Removed Medical office 55,000 SF (58) (14) (72) (25) (44) (69) (594) Net Trips (11) 44 33 49 16 65 931 DU=dwelling unit, SF=square feet Table 1 shows the net number of trips generated by the proposed development including reductions for existing trips. As shown, the project adds 33 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 65 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 931 net trips daily. April 2018 4-2 Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population con centrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 55 percent to/from the north on France Avenue • 30 percent to/from the south on France Avenue • 10 percent to/from the west on Parklawn Avenue • 5 percent to/from the east on Gallagher Drive Site Access Options As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on both Gallagher Drive and France Avenue. The access on Gallagher Drive is a full movement access. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. In addition to the proposed access configuration, this study also reviewed the impacts of eliminating the access on France Avenue and providing all access on Gallagher Drive. It was assumed that under this scenario the access on Gallagher Drive would be the same configuration as shown on the site plan. Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. April 2018 4-3 April 2018 4-4 April 2018 5-1 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, b ut with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffi c flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. April 2018 5-2 The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Figures 6 and 7 and discussed below. France Avenue/Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/Gallagher Drive (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS E for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. April 2018 5-3 Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive (minor street stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Gallagher Drive/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal imp act on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue Access As shown in the traffic analysis results, all intersections operate at acceptable levels of service both with and without the proposed access on France Avenue. From a traffic operations perspective, both access options result in minimal impacts to operati ons on France Avenue. The option with all access on Gallagher Drive results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher access location, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. As described earlier, Hennepin County staff expressed concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. April 2018 5-4 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided both sides of France Avenue and the north/west side of Gallagher Drive west of France Avenue. On the south/east side of Gallagher Drive west of France Avenue, a paved trail is provided. Striped crosswalks and pedestrian signal heads are provided at all signalized intersections along France Avenue. The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on pedestrian and bicycle operations in this area. The number of trips generated by the proposed project has minimal impact on operations at the nearby intersections, including pedestrian and b icycle operations. The full sidewalk and bicycle facility plan maps are included in the Appendix. April 2018 5-5 April 2018 5-6 April 2018 6-1 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project will include 316 on -site parking spaces. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 4th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site occurs between 6 pm and 9 pm. The peak parking demand during that time period is 177 spaces. The 316 spaces provided can accommodate the expected peak parking demand. April 2018 7-1 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 33 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 65 net trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 931 net weekday daily trips. • Traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at the intersections analyzed to accommodate the proposed project. • From a traffic operations perspective, both access options result in minimal impacts to operations on France Avenue. The option with all access on Gallagher Drive results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher access location, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. • France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. From these comments it appears Hennepin County will likely not allow access on France Avenue. • The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on pedestrian and bicycle operations in this area. The number of trips generated by the proposed project has minimal impact on operations at the nearby intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle operations. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. April 2018 8-1 8.0 Appendix • Bicycle and Sidewalk Facilities Maps • Level of Service Worksheets ¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñBrae mar Golf Cour se Bredes en Park Rosland Park Pamela Park Lewis Par k Highlands Par k Walnut Ridge Park Todd Par k Gar den Park Heights Park Van Valkenburg Par k Fr ed Richar ds G olf Course Cree k Valle y Park Lake Edina Park Krahl H ill Nor mandale Par k We ber Field Park Arneson A cre s Park Countryside Park Alde n Park Utley Park Yorktown Park Wooddale Park Arden Par k York Par k Cor ne lia Par k Str ac hauer Par k Fox Me adowPark Edinborough Par k Koje tinPark Mc GuirePark Bir chcr estPark Sher woodPark Me lody LakePark Williams Park Chowe nPark St. John'sPark TingdalePark Brow ndalePark GrandviewSquar e Fr ankTupa Par k Courtne y Fields ?ÞA@ ?úA@?vA@ ?úA@ ?ÞA@ ?vA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirr o r L a k e Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Me l o d y L a k e LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Ce n t e n n i a l L a k e Minneh a h a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine Mil e C r e e k Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St PetersLutheran School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance PublicLibrary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool HighlandSchool EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace School SouthviewMiddleSchool CountrysideSchool Valley ViewMiddle School Creek Valley School NormandaleElementary EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessor CalvinChristianSchool FireStation BL A K E R D SC H A E F E R R D VERN O N A V E FR A N C E A V E S X E R X E S A V E S CA H I L L R D 70T H ST W 66T H ST W Y O R K A V E S INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44T H S T W 50T H S T W 54T H ST W 58T H ST W GL E A S O N R D 70T H ST W 76T H ST W DEWE Y HILL RD VALLEY V I E W R D VALLEY VIE W RD MINNESOT A D R 78T H ST W / Engineering Dept November 2014Sidewalk Facilities Legend Existing Sidewalk City of Edina2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Future Active Routes To School Sidewalk Future State-Aid Sidewalk Future City Sidewalk Future Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail æ ¹» ¹» æ æ æ æ æ¹»æ æ ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹»æ æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ ¹º æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ æ ñ æ ¹º ñ æ ñ ?úA@ ?ÞA@ ?vA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mi r r o r L a k e Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Me l o d y L a k e LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Ce n t e n n i a l L a k e AldenPark VanValkenburgPark FoxMeadowPark HighlandsPark Todd Park Weber FieldPark KojetinPark BrowndalePark WooddaleParkWilliamsParkUtleyPark FrankTupaPark SherwoodPark ArdenPark YorkPark ChowenPark PamelaPark St JohnsPark StrachauerPark RoslandPark BristolParkCorneliaPark ArnesonAcresPark LakeEdinaParkFred RichardsGolf Course YorktownPark EdinboroughPark GardenPark MelodyLakePark TingdalePark CountrysidePark BredesenPark WalnutRidgePark KrahlHill Creek Valley Park HeightsPark NormandalePark McGuirePark LewisParkBraemar Park and Golf Course(Courtney Fields) Minneh a h a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine Mil e C r e e k Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St Peters Lutheran Church & School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance CalvaryChurchPublicLibrary ConcordSchool EdinaCovenant CorneliaSchool ColonialChurch HighlandSchool CalvaryLutheran EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace Church& School SouthviewJr High CrossviewLutheran CountrysideSchool St Albans Episcopal Valley ViewJr High Creek Valley School NormandaleLutheran WooddaleChurch St PatricksCatholic New CityCovenantChurch NormandaleElementary St StephensEpiscopal EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessori CalvinChristianSchool GoodSamaritanMethodist EdinaMorningsideChurch ChristPresbyterianChurch ChapelHillsCongregtional Shepard of the HillsLutheran Edina Community Lutheran Church FireStation Bl a k e R d Vernon A v e Fr a n c e A v e S Xe r x e s A v e S Ca h i l l R d 70th St W Interlachen Blvd Maloney Ave 44th St W 50th St W 54th St W 58th St W Gl e a s o n R d 70th St W 76th St W Dewey Hill Rd Valley Vie w R d Valley View Rd Minnesota Dr78th St W Wo o d d a l e A v e Tr a c y A v e Parklawn Ave Co n c o r d A v e Benton Ave G l e a s o n R d Ma l i b u R d Gr e e n F a r m s R d Mc C a u l e y T r l S Mi r r o r L a k e s D r Lin c o l n D r Wa s h i n g t o n A v e Division St Verno n A v e Golf Ter Co d e A v e Wi l r y a n A v e No r m a n d a l e R d We s t S h o r e D r Corn e l i a D r Fr a n c e A v e S Yo r k A v e S 77th St W Oh m s L n Hilary Ln Oling e r B l v d 66th St W An t r i m R d 63rd St W Xe r x e s A v e S 69th St W Bu s h L a k e R d Me t r o B l v d 66th St W 62nd St W Valley Ln Br o o k s i d e A v e ?úA@ ?ÞA@ ?vA@ 74th St W Valley V i e w R d Engineering Dept January 2016 / Bicycle Facilities Bike Routes (signed and/or marked as) Green Shared Bike Lanes Advisory Bike Lanes Bike Lanes Bike Boulevards Signed Bike Routes Bike or Shared Use Paths Shared Lane Markings Approved Primary Route Approved Secondary Route O:\Users\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Comprehensive.mxd 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 78 14 75 7 573 67 129 793 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 78 14 75 7 573 67 129 793 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 17 2 81 15 78 7 597 70 134 826 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 132 13 261 255 216 47 855 99 919 3520 30 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.52 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 545 972 98 1393 1870 1585 1781 4640 538 1781 5222 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 0 81 15 78 7 436 231 134 538 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1615 0 0 1393 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1862 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.8 4.9 0.4 13.8 14.0 4.3 6.7 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.8 4.9 0.4 13.8 14.0 4.3 6.7 6.7 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 0 0 261 255 216 47 628 327 919 2294 1255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.06 0.36 0.15 0.70 0.71 0.15 0.23 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 423 0 0 401 442 375 275 1176 613 919 2294 1255 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 0.0 43.2 41.4 43.2 53.3 48.6 48.7 13.9 6.9 6.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.0 1.5 6.3 12.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.2 6.9 7.8 1.7 2.3 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.0 0.0 0.0 43.9 41.5 44.2 54.8 54.9 60.8 14.0 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS D A A D D D D D E B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 33 174 674 967 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 43.8 56.9 8.2 Approach LOS D D E A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.7 26.3 21.0 8.9 80.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 38.0 26.0 17.0 49.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.3 16.0 3.7 2.4 8.7 7.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.2 0.1 0.0 6.1 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.9 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 69 2 27 34 8 5 43 617 27 21 849 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 69 2 27 34 8 5 43 617 27 21 849 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 70 2 28 35 8 5 44 630 28 21 866 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 245 14 202 229 145 91 799 3193 141 115 1222 96 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1401 107 1495 1380 1076 673 1781 5013 222 1781 4829 378 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 70 0 30 35 0 13 44 427 231 21 610 324 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1401 0 1601 1380 0 1749 1781 1702 1830 1781 1702 1802 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 0.0 1.8 2.5 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.4 11.4 1.3 19.2 19.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 0.0 1.8 4.3 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.4 11.4 1.3 19.2 19.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 0 216 229 0 236 799 2168 1166 115 861 456 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.14 0.15 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 0 364 356 0 398 799 2168 1166 308 1454 770 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.0 0.0 41.9 43.9 0.0 41.5 26.8 20.3 20.3 51.0 46.4 46.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 4.9 9.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.0 5.2 5.7 0.6 9.3 10.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.6 0.0 42.2 44.2 0.0 41.6 26.9 20.5 20.7 51.7 51.3 55.6 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D C C C D D E Approach Vol, veh/h 100 48 702 955 Approach Delay, s/veh 43.9 43.5 20.9 52.8 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.1 76.1 20.8 55.3 33.8 20.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 48.0 25.0 20.0 47.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 13.4 7.8 4.3 21.3 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.5 0.3 0.1 6.6 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.6 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1> 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 44 43 69 52 40 55 89 588 73 111 746 46 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 43 69 52 40 55 89 588 73 111 746 46 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 46 45 72 54 42 57 93 612 76 116 777 48 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 366 88 141 353 103 140 582 859 267 654 1064 330 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 648 1036 1781 719 976 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 46 0 117 54 0 99 93 612 76 116 777 48 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1684 1781 0 1695 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 0.0 7.1 2.6 0.0 5.8 4.1 12.5 3.4 6.4 16.4 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 0.0 7.1 2.6 0.0 5.8 4.1 12.5 3.4 6.4 16.4 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 366 0 230 353 0 243 582 859 267 654 1064 330 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.51 0.15 0.00 0.41 0.16 0.71 0.29 0.18 0.73 0.15 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 458 0 276 432 0 277 582 1485 461 654 1485 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.8 0.0 44.1 32.4 0.0 42.8 26.3 43.2 21.7 33.4 48.2 22.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.7 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.0 2.7 0.1 4.3 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.1 0.0 2.5 1.7 5.6 2.0 2.9 7.9 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 45.8 32.6 0.0 43.9 26.4 48.2 24.3 33.5 52.5 23.4 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 163 153 781 941 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 39.9 43.3 48.7 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.4 24.5 18.1 21.0 42.0 28.9 17.3 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 14.5 4.6 9.1 6.1 18.4 4.2 7.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.5 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 75 44 647 862 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 75 44 647 862 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 79 46 681 907 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 460 919 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 469 428 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 469 428 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.2 0.9 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)428 - 469 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.108 - 0.168 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 - 14.2 - - HCM Lane LOS B - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 91 42 10 54 18 Future Vol, veh/h 28 91 42 10 54 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 31 100 46 11 59 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 57 0 - 0 214 52 Stage 1 - - - - 52 - Stage 2 - - - - 162 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1547 - - - 774 1016 Stage 1 - - - - 970 - Stage 2 - - - - 867 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1547 - - - 758 1016 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 758 - Stage 1 - - - - 950 - Stage 2 - - - - 867 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.7 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1547 - - - 809 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - - - 0.098 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 84 5 30 62 24 5 1 10 4 1 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 84 5 30 62 24 5 1 10 4 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 88 5 32 65 25 5 1 11 4 1 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 90 0 0 93 0 0 240 251 91 245 241 78 Stage 1 - - - - - - 97 97 - 142 142 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 143 154 - 103 99 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1505 - - 1501 - - 714 652 967 709 660 983 Stage 1 - - - - - - 910 815 - 861 779 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 860 770 - 903 813 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1505 - - 1501 - - 699 636 967 687 644 983 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 699 636 - 687 644 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 908 813 - 859 761 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 838 752 - 890 811 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1.9 9.4 10.1 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)839 1505 - - 1501 - - 715 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.002 - - 0.021 - - 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 585 68 132 809 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 585 68 132 809 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 17 2 83 15 80 7 609 71 138 843 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 132 13 261 255 216 47 870 100 913 3520 29 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.51 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 545 972 98 1393 1870 1585 1781 4643 535 1781 5223 43 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 0 83 15 80 7 445 235 138 549 301 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1614 0 0 1393 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1863 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.1 14.3 4.5 6.9 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.1 14.3 4.5 6.9 6.9 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 0 0 261 255 216 47 638 333 913 2294 1255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.06 0.37 0.15 0.70 0.71 0.15 0.24 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 423 0 0 401 442 375 275 1176 613 913 2294 1255 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 0.0 43.3 41.4 43.2 53.3 48.5 48.6 14.2 7.0 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.1 1.5 6.2 12.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.2 7.0 7.9 1.8 2.3 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 41.5 44.3 54.8 54.7 60.6 14.2 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS D A A D D D D D E B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 33 178 687 988 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 43.9 56.8 8.3 Approach LOS D D E A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.4 26.6 21.0 8.9 80.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 38.0 26.0 17.0 49.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 16.3 3.7 2.4 8.9 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.3 0.1 0.0 6.3 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.9 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 70 2 28 35 8 5 44 629 28 21 866 68 Future Volume (veh/h) 70 2 28 35 8 5 44 629 28 21 866 68 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 71 2 29 36 8 5 45 642 29 21 884 69 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 246 14 202 228 145 91 790 3189 143 115 1245 97 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1401 103 1498 1378 1076 673 1781 5009 225 1781 4831 376 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 71 0 31 36 0 13 45 435 236 21 622 331 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1401 0 1601 1378 0 1749 1781 1702 1830 1781 1702 1803 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 0.0 1.9 2.6 0.0 0.7 2.4 11.6 11.7 1.3 19.6 19.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 0.0 1.9 4.5 0.0 0.7 2.4 11.6 11.7 1.3 19.6 19.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 246 0 216 228 0 236 790 2168 1165 115 877 465 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.14 0.16 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 0 364 355 0 398 790 2168 1165 308 1454 770 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.0 0.0 42.0 43.9 0.0 41.5 27.1 20.4 20.4 51.0 46.3 46.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 4.8 9.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.0 5.3 5.8 0.6 9.5 10.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.6 0.0 42.3 44.3 0.0 41.6 27.2 20.6 20.8 51.7 51.1 55.3 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D C C C D D E Approach Vol, veh/h 102 49 716 974 Approach Delay, s/veh 43.9 43.5 21.0 52.6 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.1 76.0 20.9 54.8 34.3 20.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 48.0 25.0 20.0 47.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 13.7 7.8 4.4 21.7 6.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.3 0.1 6.7 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.6 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1> 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 600 74 113 761 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 600 74 113 761 47 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 46 73 55 43 58 95 625 77 118 793 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 366 89 141 353 103 140 575 874 271 647 1081 336 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 651 1033 1781 722 973 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 119 55 0 101 95 625 77 118 793 49 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1684 1781 0 1695 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.7 3.4 6.6 16.7 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.7 3.4 6.6 16.7 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 366 0 230 353 0 243 575 874 271 647 1081 336 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.52 0.16 0.00 0.42 0.17 0.72 0.28 0.18 0.73 0.15 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 456 0 276 431 0 277 575 1485 461 647 1485 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.7 0.0 44.1 32.4 0.0 42.9 26.6 43.1 21.4 33.7 48.1 22.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.0 2.6 0.1 4.3 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.2 0.0 2.6 1.8 5.7 2.0 3.0 8.1 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 46.0 32.6 0.0 44.1 26.8 48.0 24.0 33.8 52.4 23.2 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 166 156 797 960 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 40.0 43.2 48.6 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.0 24.8 18.2 21.0 41.5 29.3 17.4 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 14.7 4.6 9.2 6.2 18.7 4.3 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.5 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 77 45 660 879 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 77 45 660 879 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 81 47 695 925 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 469 937 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 463 420 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 463 420 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.4 0.9 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)420 - 463 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.113 - 0.175 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 - 14.4 - - HCM Lane LOS B - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 93 43 10 55 18 Future Vol, veh/h 29 93 43 10 55 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 102 47 11 60 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 58 0 - 0 219 53 Stage 1 - - - - 53 - Stage 2 - - - - 166 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 769 1014 Stage 1 - - - - 970 - Stage 2 - - - - 863 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 752 1014 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 752 - Stage 1 - - - - 949 - Stage 2 - - - - 863 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1546 - - - 803 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.1 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 10 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 86 5 31 63 24 5 1 10 4 1 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 86 5 31 63 24 5 1 10 4 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 91 5 33 66 25 5 1 11 4 1 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 91 0 0 96 0 0 246 257 94 251 247 79 Stage 1 - - - - - - 100 100 - 145 145 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 146 157 - 106 102 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - 1498 - - 708 647 963 702 655 981 Stage 1 - - - - - - 906 812 - 858 777 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 857 768 - 900 811 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - 1498 - - 693 631 963 680 639 981 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 693 631 - 680 639 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 904 810 - 856 759 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 835 750 - 887 809 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 2 9.4 10.1 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)834 1504 - - 1498 - - 709 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.002 - - 0.022 - - 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 600 68 132 799 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 600 68 132 799 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 17 2 83 15 80 7 625 71 138 832 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 132 13 261 255 216 47 890 100 907 3520 30 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.51 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 545 972 98 1393 1870 1585 1781 4657 524 1781 5223 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 0 83 15 80 7 455 241 138 542 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1614 0 0 1393 1870 1585 1781 1702 1776 1781 1702 1862 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.4 14.6 4.5 6.8 6.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.4 14.6 4.5 6.8 6.8 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 0 0 261 255 216 47 651 340 907 2294 1255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.06 0.37 0.15 0.70 0.71 0.15 0.24 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 423 0 0 401 442 375 275 1176 614 907 2294 1255 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 0.0 43.3 41.4 43.2 53.3 48.4 48.5 14.4 7.0 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.1 1.5 6.1 11.8 0.1 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.2 7.1 8.1 1.8 2.3 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 41.5 44.3 54.8 54.6 60.4 14.5 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS D A A D D D D D E B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 33 178 703 977 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 43.9 56.6 8.3 Approach LOS D D E A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.0 27.0 21.0 8.9 80.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 38.0 26.0 17.0 49.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 16.6 3.7 2.4 8.8 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.4 0.1 0.0 6.2 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.2 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 86 5 34 35 8 5 43 624 28 29 868 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 86 5 34 35 8 5 43 624 28 29 868 42 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 88 5 35 36 8 5 44 637 29 30 886 43 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 247 27 192 221 146 91 801 3098 140 146 1251 61 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1401 202 1414 1367 1076 673 1781 5007 227 1781 4989 242 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 88 0 40 36 0 13 44 432 234 30 604 325 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1401 0 1616 1367 0 1749 1781 1702 1830 1781 1702 1827 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 0.0 2.4 2.6 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.6 11.7 1.8 19.0 19.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.1 0.0 2.4 5.0 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.6 11.7 1.8 19.0 19.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 247 0 219 221 0 237 801 2106 1132 146 853 458 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.00 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 0 367 346 0 398 801 2106 1132 308 1454 781 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.5 0.0 42.1 44.4 0.0 41.4 26.8 21.3 21.3 50.0 46.5 46.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.7 4.9 9.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 1.0 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.0 5.3 5.8 0.8 9.3 10.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.4 0.0 42.5 44.7 0.0 41.5 26.8 21.5 21.7 50.7 51.4 55.5 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D C C C D D E Approach Vol, veh/h 128 49 710 959 Approach Delay, s/veh 44.5 43.8 21.9 52.8 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 74.1 20.9 55.5 33.6 20.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 48.0 25.0 20.0 47.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 13.7 9.1 4.3 21.1 7.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.3 0.1 6.5 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 40.1 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1> 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 594 74 113 770 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 594 74 113 770 47 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 46 73 55 43 58 95 619 77 118 802 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 366 89 141 353 103 140 572 867 269 650 1091 339 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 651 1033 1781 722 973 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 119 55 0 101 95 619 77 118 802 49 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1684 1781 0 1695 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.6 3.4 6.6 16.9 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.6 3.4 6.6 16.9 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 366 0 230 353 0 243 572 867 269 650 1091 339 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.52 0.16 0.00 0.42 0.17 0.71 0.29 0.18 0.74 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 456 0 276 431 0 277 572 1485 461 650 1485 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.7 0.0 44.1 32.4 0.0 42.9 26.8 43.1 21.5 33.6 48.1 22.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.0 2.7 0.1 4.3 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.2 0.0 2.6 1.8 5.6 2.0 3.0 8.2 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 46.0 32.6 0.0 44.1 26.9 48.1 24.2 33.7 52.4 23.0 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 166 156 791 969 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 40.0 43.2 48.6 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.1 24.7 18.2 21.0 41.3 29.5 17.4 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 14.6 4.6 9.2 6.2 18.9 4.3 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.6 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 49 675 869 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 49 675 869 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 78 52 711 915 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 464 927 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 466 424 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 466 424 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.3 1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)424 - 466 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.122 - 0.167 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 - 14.3 - - HCM Lane LOS B - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 93 43 10 55 21 Future Vol, veh/h 26 93 43 10 55 21 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 102 47 11 60 23 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 58 0 - 0 213 53 Stage 1 - - - - 53 - Stage 2 - - - - 160 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 775 1014 Stage 1 - - - - 970 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 760 1014 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 760 - Stage 1 - - - - 951 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.6 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1546 - - - 817 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.102 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 83 5 31 63 24 5 1 10 35 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 83 5 31 63 24 5 1 10 35 1 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 87 5 33 66 25 5 1 11 37 1 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 91 0 0 92 0 0 243 253 90 247 243 79 Stage 1 - - - - - - 96 96 - 145 145 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 147 157 - 102 98 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - 1503 - - 711 650 968 707 659 981 Stage 1 - - - - - - 911 815 - 858 777 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 856 768 - 904 814 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - 1503 - - 694 634 968 685 643 981 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 694 634 - 685 643 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 909 813 - 856 759 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 832 750 - 891 812 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 2 9.4 10.4 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)837 1504 - - 1503 - - 705 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.002 - - 0.022 - - 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.4 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.2 11: CSAH 17/France Ave & access 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 0 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 17 0 724 924 19 Future Vol, veh/h 0 17 0 724 924 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 18 0 762 973 20 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 497 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 444 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 444 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.4 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)- 444 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.04 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 13.4 - - HCM Lane LOS - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - - 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 600 68 132 799 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 600 68 132 799 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 17 2 83 15 80 7 625 71 138 832 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 132 13 261 255 216 47 890 100 907 3520 30 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.51 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 545 972 98 1393 1870 1585 1781 4657 524 1781 5223 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 0 83 15 80 7 455 241 138 542 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1614 0 0 1393 1870 1585 1781 1702 1776 1781 1702 1862 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.4 14.6 4.5 6.8 6.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.4 14.6 4.5 6.8 6.8 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 0 0 261 255 216 47 651 340 907 2294 1255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.06 0.37 0.15 0.70 0.71 0.15 0.24 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 423 0 0 401 442 375 275 1176 614 907 2294 1255 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 0.0 43.3 41.4 43.2 53.3 48.4 48.5 14.4 7.0 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.1 1.5 6.1 11.8 0.1 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.2 7.1 8.1 1.8 2.3 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 41.5 44.3 54.8 54.6 60.4 14.5 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS D A A D D D D D E B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 33 178 703 977 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 43.9 56.6 8.3 Approach LOS D D E A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.0 27.0 21.0 8.9 80.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 38.0 26.0 17.0 49.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 16.6 3.7 2.4 8.8 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.4 0.1 0.0 6.2 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.2 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 94 5 43 35 8 5 43 624 28 21 860 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 94 5 43 35 8 5 43 624 28 21 860 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 96 5 44 36 8 5 44 637 29 21 878 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 247 22 197 213 146 91 795 3183 144 115 1238 87 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1401 164 1446 1356 1076 673 1781 5007 227 1781 4870 343 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 96 0 49 36 0 13 44 432 234 21 613 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1401 0 1610 1356 0 1749 1781 1702 1830 1781 1702 1809 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 3.0 2.7 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.5 11.6 1.3 19.3 19.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 0.0 3.0 5.7 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.5 11.6 1.3 19.3 19.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.19 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 247 0 219 213 0 238 795 2164 1163 115 865 460 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.22 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 0 366 337 0 398 795 2164 1163 308 1454 773 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.7 0.0 42.3 44.9 0.0 41.4 27.0 20.4 20.4 51.0 46.4 46.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 4.9 9.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 0.0 1.2 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.0 5.2 5.7 0.6 9.4 10.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.7 0.0 42.9 45.2 0.0 41.5 27.0 20.6 20.8 51.7 51.3 55.5 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D C C C D D E Approach Vol, veh/h 145 49 710 961 Approach Delay, s/veh 44.8 44.2 21.0 52.7 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.1 75.9 21.0 55.1 34.0 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 48.0 25.0 20.0 47.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 13.6 9.8 4.3 21.4 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.4 0.1 6.6 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.8 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1> 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 594 74 113 770 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 594 74 113 770 47 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 46 73 55 43 58 95 619 77 118 802 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 366 89 141 353 103 140 572 867 269 650 1091 339 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 651 1033 1781 722 973 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 119 55 0 101 95 619 77 118 802 49 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1684 1781 0 1695 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.6 3.4 6.6 16.9 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.6 3.4 6.6 16.9 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 366 0 230 353 0 243 572 867 269 650 1091 339 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.52 0.16 0.00 0.42 0.17 0.71 0.29 0.18 0.74 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 456 0 276 431 0 277 572 1485 461 650 1485 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.7 0.0 44.1 32.4 0.0 42.9 26.8 43.1 21.5 33.6 48.1 22.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.0 2.7 0.1 4.3 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.2 0.0 2.6 1.8 5.6 2.0 3.0 8.2 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 46.0 32.6 0.0 44.1 26.9 48.1 24.2 33.7 52.4 23.0 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 166 156 791 969 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 40.0 43.2 48.6 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.1 24.7 18.2 21.0 41.3 29.5 17.4 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 14.6 4.6 9.2 6.2 18.9 4.3 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.6 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 49 675 869 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 49 675 869 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 78 52 711 915 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 464 927 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 466 424 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 466 424 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.3 1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)424 - 466 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.122 - 0.167 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 - 14.3 - - HCM Lane LOS B - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 93 43 10 55 21 Future Vol, veh/h 26 93 43 10 55 21 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 102 47 11 60 23 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 58 0 - 0 213 53 Stage 1 - - - - 53 - Stage 2 - - - - 160 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 775 1014 Stage 1 - - - - 970 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 760 1014 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 760 - Stage 1 - - - - 951 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.6 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1546 - - - 817 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.102 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 83 5 31 63 43 5 1 10 52 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 83 5 31 63 43 5 1 10 52 1 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 87 5 33 66 45 5 1 11 55 1 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 111 0 0 92 0 0 253 273 90 257 253 89 Stage 1 - - - - - - 96 96 - 155 155 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 157 177 - 102 98 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1479 - - 1503 - - 700 634 968 696 650 969 Stage 1 - - - - - - 911 815 - 847 769 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 845 753 - 904 814 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1479 - - 1503 - - 683 618 968 674 633 969 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 683 618 - 674 633 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 909 813 - 845 751 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 820 735 - 891 812 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1.7 9.4 10.7 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)830 1479 - - 1503 - - 688 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.002 - - 0.022 - - 0.087 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.4 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.3 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 105 21 122 19 1314 152 182 915 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 105 21 122 19 1314 152 182 915 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 24 9 111 22 128 20 1383 160 192 963 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 96 88 27 216 208 176 104 1689 195 697 3658 15 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.39 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 519 795 246 1376 1870 1585 1781 4641 537 1781 5249 22 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 0 111 22 128 20 1014 529 192 625 342 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1561 0 0 1376 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1866 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 5.4 1.4 10.5 1.4 34.4 34.4 9.9 9.2 9.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 9.5 1.4 10.5 1.4 34.4 34.4 9.9 9.2 9.2 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 0 216 208 176 104 1239 646 697 2372 1301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.11 0.73 0.19 0.82 0.82 0.28 0.26 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 0 0 297 319 270 198 1614 841 697 2372 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.1 0.0 0.0 57.3 54.0 58.0 59.2 31.0 31.0 28.0 7.6 7.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.2 5.6 0.9 6.1 11.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.5 0.7 13.8 15.3 4.3 3.2 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 0.0 0.0 59.2 54.2 63.6 60.1 37.1 42.1 28.2 7.9 8.1 LnGrp LOS E A A E D E E D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 57 261 1563 1159 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.8 61.0 39.1 11.3 Approach LOS E E D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.9 55.1 21.0 13.9 100.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 64.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.9 36.4 6.1 3.4 11.2 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 12.8 0.2 0.0 7.7 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.7 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 115 6 54 85 10 68 42 1382 92 77 903 88 Future Volume (veh/h) 115 6 54 85 10 68 42 1382 92 77 903 88 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 119 6 56 88 10 70 43 1425 95 79 931 91 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 194 24 219 210 31 214 158 1901 127 582 2965 289 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.33 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh/h 1319 156 1453 1340 202 1414 1781 4890 326 1781 4730 461 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 119 0 62 88 0 80 43 992 528 79 669 353 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1319 0 1609 1340 0 1616 1781 1702 1812 1781 1702 1787 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 0.0 4.6 8.4 0.0 6.0 3.2 37.9 37.9 4.2 12.3 12.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.9 0.0 4.6 13.0 0.0 6.0 3.2 37.9 37.9 4.2 12.3 12.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.26 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 194 0 243 210 0 244 158 1323 704 582 2133 1120 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.00 0.26 0.42 0.00 0.33 0.27 0.75 0.75 0.14 0.31 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 288 0 358 306 0 359 238 1715 913 582 2133 1120 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.2 0.0 50.6 56.3 0.0 51.2 61.2 52.5 52.5 32.0 11.7 11.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 0.0 0.5 1.3 0.0 0.8 0.7 3.2 6.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.2 0.0 1.9 2.9 0.0 2.5 1.5 18.0 19.7 1.8 4.6 5.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.3 0.0 51.2 57.7 0.0 52.0 62.0 55.8 58.5 32.1 12.1 12.5 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D E E E C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 181 168 1563 1101 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.5 54.9 56.8 13.6 Approach LOS E D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 50.1 58.5 26.4 18.0 90.6 26.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 68.0 30.0 18.0 69.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 39.9 19.9 5.2 14.4 15.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.5 0.5 0.0 8.4 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.0 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 60 75 86 60 121 100 1324 67 139 929 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 71 60 75 86 60 121 100 1324 67 139 929 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 74 62 78 90 62 126 104 1379 70 145 968 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 339 84 105 284 214 181 616 2518 782 197 1318 409 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.35 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 753 947 1781 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 74 0 140 90 62 126 104 1379 70 145 968 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1700 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 0.0 10.8 5.6 4.1 10.3 5.5 25.3 3.2 10.9 25.0 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.6 0.0 10.8 5.6 4.1 10.3 5.5 25.3 3.2 10.9 25.0 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 339 0 189 284 214 181 616 2518 782 197 1318 409 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.74 0.32 0.29 0.70 0.17 0.55 0.09 0.74 0.73 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 352 0 227 304 263 223 616 2518 782 290 2269 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 58.1 43.9 54.8 57.5 30.7 23.8 18.1 63.1 57.2 25.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 10.1 0.6 0.7 6.9 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.0 3.5 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.2 2.6 2.0 4.5 2.4 10.2 1.2 5.5 11.9 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 0.0 68.2 44.5 55.5 64.4 30.8 24.6 18.4 68.1 60.7 25.6 LnGrp LOS D A E D E E C C B E E C Approach Vol, veh/h 214 278 1553 1130 Approach Delay, s/veh 59.7 56.0 24.8 61.1 Approach LOS E E C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.9 72.6 20.5 21.0 52.7 40.9 20.1 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 55.0 16.0 18.0 17.0 60.0 15.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.9 27.3 7.6 12.8 7.5 27.0 6.6 12.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 11.9 0.1 0.3 0.1 7.9 0.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.8 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 69 80 1485 998 31 Future Vol, veh/h 0 69 80 1485 998 31 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 73 84 1563 1051 33 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 542 1084 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 415 356 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 415 356 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.5 0.9 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)356 - 415 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.237 - 0.175 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 18.2 - 15.5 - - HCM Lane LOS C - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 76 102 74 23 44 Future Vol, veh/h 50 76 102 74 23 44 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 80 107 78 24 46 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 185 0 - 0 332 146 Stage 1 - - - - 146 - Stage 2 - - - - 186 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1390 - - - 663 901 Stage 1 - - - - 881 - Stage 2 - - - - 846 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1390 - - - 636 901 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 636 - Stage 1 - - - - 846 - Stage 2 - - - - 846 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.1 0 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1390 - - - 788 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 - - - 0.09 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 87 5 10 123 4 10 1 40 24 1 3 Future Vol, veh/h 1 87 5 10 123 4 10 1 40 24 1 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 92 5 11 129 4 11 1 42 25 1 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 133 0 0 97 0 0 252 252 95 271 252 131 Stage 1 - - - - - - 97 97 - 153 153 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 155 155 - 118 99 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1452 - - 1496 - - 701 651 962 682 651 919 Stage 1 - - - - - - 910 815 - 849 771 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 847 769 - 887 813 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1452 - - 1496 - - 693 645 962 647 645 919 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 693 645 - 647 645 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 909 814 - 848 765 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 836 763 - 846 812 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.5 9.3 10.6 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)886 1452 - - 1496 - - 668 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.001 - - 0.007 - - 0.044 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 7.5 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1340 155 186 933 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1340 155 186 933 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 24 9 113 22 131 20 1411 163 196 982 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 95 88 27 216 208 176 104 1717 198 687 3658 15 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 518 794 246 1376 1870 1585 1781 4642 536 1781 5249 21 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 0 113 22 131 20 1035 539 196 637 349 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1559 0 0 1376 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1867 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.4 9.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 9.7 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.4 9.4 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 0 216 208 176 104 1259 656 687 2372 1301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.74 0.19 0.82 0.82 0.29 0.27 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 0 0 297 319 270 198 1614 841 687 2372 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.1 0.0 0.0 57.4 54.0 58.1 59.2 30.5 30.5 28.6 7.6 7.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 6.1 0.9 6.1 11.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.6 0.7 14.0 15.5 4.4 3.3 3.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.2 64.2 60.1 36.6 41.6 28.9 7.9 8.1 LnGrp LOS E A A E D E E D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 57 266 1594 1182 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.8 61.3 38.6 11.4 Approach LOS E E D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.1 55.9 21.0 13.9 100.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 64.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 37.0 6.1 3.4 11.4 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 12.9 0.2 0.0 7.9 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.5 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 117 6 55 87 10 69 43 1410 94 79 921 90 Future Volume (veh/h) 117 6 55 87 10 69 43 1410 94 79 921 90 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 121 6 57 90 10 71 44 1454 97 81 949 93 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 196 23 223 212 31 217 160 1934 129 566 2950 288 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.32 0.62 0.62 Sat Flow, veh/h 1317 153 1455 1339 199 1416 1781 4890 326 1781 4729 462 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 0 63 90 0 81 44 1012 539 81 682 360 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1317 0 1608 1339 0 1615 1781 1702 1812 1781 1702 1787 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.2 0.0 4.7 8.6 0.0 6.0 3.3 38.7 38.7 4.4 12.7 12.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.2 0.0 4.7 13.2 0.0 6.0 3.3 38.7 38.7 4.4 12.7 12.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.26 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 196 0 246 212 0 247 160 1347 717 566 2123 1115 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.00 0.26 0.42 0.00 0.33 0.28 0.75 0.75 0.14 0.32 0.32 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 287 0 357 305 0 359 238 1715 913 566 2123 1115 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.1 0.0 50.4 56.2 0.0 51.0 61.2 52.3 52.3 32.9 11.9 12.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 0.0 0.5 1.3 0.0 0.8 0.7 3.2 5.9 0.1 0.4 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.2 0.0 1.9 3.0 0.0 2.5 1.5 18.3 20.0 1.9 4.8 5.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.2 0.0 50.9 57.6 0.0 51.7 61.9 55.5 58.1 33.0 12.3 12.7 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D E E E C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 184 171 1595 1123 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.4 54.8 56.6 14.0 Approach LOS E D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 48.9 59.4 26.7 18.1 90.2 26.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 68.0 30.0 18.0 69.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 40.7 20.2 5.3 14.8 15.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.7 0.5 0.0 8.6 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.0 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1351 68 142 948 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1351 68 142 948 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 64 80 92 64 128 106 1407 71 148 988 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 338 84 105 281 214 181 606 2517 781 197 1344 417 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 756 945 1781 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 0 144 92 64 128 106 1407 71 148 988 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1700 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.0 3.2 11.1 25.5 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.0 3.2 11.1 25.5 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 338 0 189 281 214 181 606 2517 781 197 1344 417 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.76 0.33 0.30 0.71 0.17 0.56 0.09 0.75 0.73 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 350 0 227 300 263 223 606 2517 781 290 2269 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 58.3 43.9 54.8 57.6 31.2 24.0 18.2 63.2 57.0 25.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.7 0.8 7.5 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.8 3.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.4 2.6 2.1 4.6 2.5 10.5 1.2 5.6 12.1 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 0.0 70.0 44.6 55.6 65.1 31.4 24.9 18.4 68.9 60.5 25.2 LnGrp LOS D A E D E E C C B E E C Approach Vol, veh/h 219 284 1584 1153 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.0 56.3 25.0 61.0 Approach LOS E E C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.9 72.5 20.5 21.0 51.9 41.5 20.1 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 55.0 16.0 18.0 17.0 60.0 15.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.1 28.0 7.7 13.1 7.6 27.5 6.7 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 12.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 8.1 0.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 70 82 1515 1018 32 Future Vol, veh/h 0 70 82 1515 1018 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 74 86 1595 1072 34 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 553 1106 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 408 348 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 408 348 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.8 1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)348 - 408 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.248 - 0.181 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 18.7 - 15.8 - - HCM Lane LOS C - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 0.7 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 51 78 104 75 23 45 Future Vol, veh/h 51 78 104 75 23 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 54 82 109 79 24 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 188 0 - 0 339 149 Stage 1 - - - - 149 - Stage 2 - - - - 190 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 657 898 Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 842 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 630 898 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 630 - Stage 1 - - - - 843 - Stage 2 - - - - 842 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3 0 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1386 - - - 785 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 - - - 0.091 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 89 5 10 125 4 10 1 40 24 1 3 Future Vol, veh/h 1 89 5 10 125 4 10 1 40 24 1 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 94 5 11 132 4 11 1 42 25 1 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 136 0 0 99 0 0 257 257 97 276 257 134 Stage 1 - - - - - - 99 99 - 156 156 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 158 158 - 120 101 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1448 - - 1494 - - 696 647 959 676 647 915 Stage 1 - - - - - - 907 813 - 846 769 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 844 767 - 884 811 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1448 - - 1494 - - 688 641 959 641 641 915 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 688 641 - 641 641 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 906 812 - 845 763 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 833 761 - 843 810 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.5 9.3 10.7 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)882 1448 - - 1494 - - 662 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.001 - - 0.007 - - 0.045 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 7.5 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1341 155 186 948 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1341 155 186 948 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 24 9 113 22 131 20 1412 163 196 998 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 95 88 27 216 208 176 104 1718 198 687 3659 15 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 518 794 246 1376 1870 1585 1781 4642 536 1781 5250 21 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 0 113 22 131 20 1035 540 196 647 355 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1559 0 0 1376 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1867 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.6 9.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 9.7 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.6 9.6 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 0 216 208 176 104 1260 657 687 2372 1301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.74 0.19 0.82 0.82 0.29 0.27 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 0 0 297 319 270 198 1614 841 687 2372 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.1 0.0 0.0 57.4 54.0 58.1 59.2 30.5 30.5 28.6 7.7 7.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 6.1 0.9 6.1 11.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.6 0.7 14.0 15.5 4.4 3.4 3.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.2 64.2 60.1 36.6 41.6 28.9 7.9 8.2 LnGrp LOS E A A E D E E D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 57 266 1595 1198 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.8 61.3 38.6 11.4 Approach LOS E E D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.0 56.0 21.0 13.9 100.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 64.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 37.0 6.1 3.4 11.6 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 12.9 0.2 0.0 8.1 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.4 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 118 7 51 87 14 69 61 1401 94 88 924 86 Future Volume (veh/h) 118 7 51 87 14 69 61 1401 94 88 924 86 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 122 7 53 90 14 71 63 1444 97 91 953 89 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 197 29 222 219 42 212 179 1923 129 565 2899 270 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.32 0.61 0.61 Sat Flow, veh/h 1313 188 1425 1343 268 1358 1781 4887 328 1781 4752 443 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 122 0 60 90 0 85 63 1006 535 91 682 360 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1313 0 1614 1343 0 1626 1781 1702 1811 1781 1702 1791 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.3 0.0 4.4 8.5 0.0 6.3 4.7 38.5 38.5 5.0 13.2 13.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.6 0.0 4.4 12.9 0.0 6.3 4.7 38.5 38.5 5.0 13.2 13.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.25 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 197 0 252 219 0 253 179 1339 713 565 2077 1093 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.00 0.24 0.41 0.00 0.34 0.35 0.75 0.75 0.16 0.33 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 284 0 359 308 0 361 238 1715 912 565 2077 1093 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.0 0.0 50.0 55.6 0.0 50.8 60.9 52.4 52.4 33.1 12.8 12.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.5 1.2 0.0 0.8 0.9 3.2 5.9 0.1 0.4 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.3 0.0 1.8 3.0 0.0 2.6 2.2 18.2 19.9 2.2 5.0 5.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.2 0.0 50.4 56.8 0.0 51.5 61.9 55.6 58.2 33.3 13.3 13.6 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D E E E C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 182 175 1604 1133 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.3 54.3 56.7 15.0 Approach LOS E D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 48.8 59.1 27.0 19.6 88.4 27.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 68.0 30.0 18.0 69.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 40.5 20.6 6.7 15.2 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.7 0.4 0.1 8.6 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.4 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1360 68 142 947 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1360 68 142 947 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 64 80 92 64 128 106 1417 71 148 986 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 338 84 105 281 214 181 607 2517 781 197 1342 416 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 756 945 1781 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 0 144 92 64 128 106 1417 71 148 986 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1700 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.3 3.2 11.1 25.4 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.3 3.2 11.1 25.4 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 338 0 189 281 214 181 607 2517 781 197 1342 416 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.76 0.33 0.30 0.71 0.17 0.56 0.09 0.75 0.73 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 350 0 227 300 263 223 607 2517 781 290 2269 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 58.3 43.9 54.8 57.6 31.2 24.0 18.2 63.2 57.1 25.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.7 0.8 7.5 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.8 3.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.4 2.6 2.1 4.6 2.5 10.6 1.2 5.6 12.1 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 0.0 70.0 44.6 55.6 65.1 31.3 24.9 18.4 68.9 60.5 25.2 LnGrp LOS D A E D E E C C B E E C Approach Vol, veh/h 219 284 1594 1151 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.0 56.3 25.1 61.1 Approach LOS E E C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.9 72.5 20.5 21.0 52.0 41.5 20.1 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 55.0 16.0 18.0 17.0 60.0 15.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.1 28.3 7.7 13.1 7.6 27.4 6.7 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 12.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 8.0 0.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 82 1516 1033 32 Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 82 1516 1033 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 78 86 1596 1087 34 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 561 1121 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 403 342 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 403 342 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)342 - 403 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.252 - 0.193 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 19 - 16.1 - - HCM Lane LOS C - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 0.7 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 78 104 75 23 45 Future Vol, veh/h 55 78 104 75 23 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 58 82 109 79 24 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 188 0 - 0 347 149 Stage 1 - - - - 149 - Stage 2 - - - - 198 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 650 898 Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 621 898 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 621 - Stage 1 - - - - 840 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.2 0 10.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1386 - - - 780 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - - 0.092 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 88 5 10 125 33 10 1 40 42 1 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 88 5 10 125 33 10 1 40 42 1 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 93 5 11 132 35 11 1 42 44 1 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 167 0 0 98 0 0 281 295 96 299 280 150 Stage 1 - - - - - - 106 106 - 172 172 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 175 189 - 127 108 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1411 - - 1495 - - 671 616 960 653 628 896 Stage 1 - - - - - - 900 807 - 830 756 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 827 744 - 877 806 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1411 - - 1495 - - 660 609 960 618 620 896 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 660 609 - 618 620 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 896 804 - 827 750 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 814 738 - 834 803 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.4 9.4 11.1 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)872 1411 - - 1495 - - 639 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 0.004 - - 0.007 - - 0.079 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.6 0 - 7.4 0 - 11.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 11: CSAH 17/France Ave & access 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 0 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 18 0 1597 1079 29 Future Vol, veh/h 0 18 0 1597 1079 29 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 19 0 1681 1136 31 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 584 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 390 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 390 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.7 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)- 390 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.049 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 14.7 - - HCM Lane LOS - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - - 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1341 155 186 948 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1341 155 186 948 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 24 9 113 22 131 20 1412 163 196 998 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 95 88 27 216 208 176 104 1718 198 687 3659 15 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 518 794 246 1376 1870 1585 1781 4642 536 1781 5250 21 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 0 113 22 131 20 1035 540 196 647 355 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1559 0 0 1376 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1867 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.6 9.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 9.7 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.6 9.6 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 0 216 208 176 104 1260 657 687 2372 1301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.74 0.19 0.82 0.82 0.29 0.27 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 0 0 297 319 270 198 1614 841 687 2372 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.1 0.0 0.0 57.4 54.0 58.1 59.2 30.5 30.5 28.6 7.7 7.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 6.1 0.9 6.1 11.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.6 0.7 14.0 15.5 4.4 3.4 3.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.2 64.2 60.1 36.6 41.6 28.9 7.9 8.2 LnGrp LOS E A A E D E E D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 57 266 1595 1198 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.8 61.3 38.6 11.4 Approach LOS E E D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.0 56.0 21.0 13.9 100.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 64.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 37.0 6.1 3.4 11.6 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 12.9 0.2 0.0 8.1 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.4 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 127 7 60 87 14 69 61 1401 94 79 915 115 Future Volume (veh/h) 127 7 60 87 14 69 61 1401 94 79 915 115 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 131 7 62 90 14 71 63 1444 97 81 943 119 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 206 27 235 220 44 221 179 1923 129 554 2772 349 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.31 0.60 0.60 Sat Flow, veh/h 1313 163 1447 1332 268 1358 1781 4887 328 1781 4593 578 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 131 0 69 90 0 85 63 1006 535 81 698 364 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1313 0 1610 1332 0 1626 1781 1702 1811 1781 1702 1766 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.2 0.0 5.1 8.6 0.0 6.2 4.7 38.5 38.5 4.4 13.8 13.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 19.5 0.0 5.1 13.6 0.0 6.2 4.7 38.5 38.5 4.4 13.8 13.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.33 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 206 0 262 220 0 264 179 1339 713 554 2055 1066 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.00 0.32 0.35 0.75 0.75 0.15 0.34 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 284 0 358 299 0 361 238 1715 912 554 2055 1066 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.6 0.0 49.5 55.4 0.0 50.0 60.9 52.4 52.4 33.6 13.3 13.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.5 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.9 3.2 5.9 0.1 0.5 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 0.0 2.1 3.0 0.0 2.6 2.2 18.2 19.9 1.9 5.3 5.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.8 0.0 50.0 56.7 0.0 50.7 61.9 55.6 58.2 33.7 13.8 14.2 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D E E E C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 200 175 1604 1143 Approach Delay, s/veh 57.7 53.7 56.7 15.3 Approach LOS E D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 48.0 59.1 27.9 19.6 87.5 27.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 68.0 30.0 18.0 69.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 40.5 21.5 6.7 15.9 15.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.7 0.5 0.1 8.8 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.5 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1360 68 142 947 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1360 68 142 947 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 64 80 92 64 128 106 1417 71 148 986 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 338 84 105 281 214 181 607 2517 781 197 1342 416 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 756 945 1781 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 0 144 92 64 128 106 1417 71 148 986 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1700 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.3 3.2 11.1 25.4 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.3 3.2 11.1 25.4 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 338 0 189 281 214 181 607 2517 781 197 1342 416 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.76 0.33 0.30 0.71 0.17 0.56 0.09 0.75 0.73 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 350 0 227 300 263 223 607 2517 781 290 2269 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 58.3 43.9 54.8 57.6 31.2 24.0 18.2 63.2 57.1 25.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.7 0.8 7.5 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.8 3.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.4 2.6 2.1 4.6 2.5 10.6 1.2 5.6 12.1 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 0.0 70.0 44.6 55.6 65.1 31.3 24.9 18.4 68.9 60.5 25.2 LnGrp LOS D A E D E E C C B E E C Approach Vol, veh/h 219 284 1594 1151 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.0 56.3 25.1 61.1 Approach LOS E E C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.9 72.5 20.5 21.0 52.0 41.5 20.1 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 55.0 16.0 18.0 17.0 60.0 15.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.1 28.3 7.7 13.1 7.6 27.4 6.7 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 12.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 8.0 0.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 82 1516 1033 32 Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 82 1516 1033 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 78 86 1596 1087 34 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 561 1121 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 403 342 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 403 342 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)342 - 403 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.252 - 0.193 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 19 - 16.1 - - HCM Lane LOS C - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 0.7 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 78 104 75 23 45 Future Vol, veh/h 55 78 104 75 23 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 58 82 109 79 24 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 188 0 - 0 347 149 Stage 1 - - - - 149 - Stage 2 - - - - 198 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 650 898 Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 621 898 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 621 - Stage 1 - - - - 840 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.2 0 10.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1386 - - - 780 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - - 0.092 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 88 5 10 123 62 10 1 40 60 1 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 88 5 10 123 62 10 1 40 60 1 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 93 5 11 129 65 11 1 42 63 1 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 194 0 0 98 0 0 293 322 96 311 292 162 Stage 1 - - - - - - 106 106 - 184 184 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 187 216 - 127 108 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1379 - - 1495 - - 659 595 960 642 619 883 Stage 1 - - - - - - 900 807 - 818 747 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 815 724 - 877 806 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1379 - - 1495 - - 648 588 960 607 612 883 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 648 588 - 607 612 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 896 804 - 815 741 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 803 718 - 834 803 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.4 9.4 11.5 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)867 1379 - - 1495 - - 622 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 0.004 - - 0.007 - - 0.112 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.6 0 - 7.4 0 - 11.5 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.4 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 1 of 11 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers April 25, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Commissioners Miranda, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Chair Olsen. Student Members, Jones. Staff, City Planner, Teague, Assistant Planner, Bodeker, Communication Cord, Eidsness, Support Staff, Hoogenakker III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the April 25, 2018, meeting agenda. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A motion was made by Commissioner Strauss to approve the minutes of the April 11, 2018, meeting minutes. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Berube. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Public Hearings A. Variance request for setback from Lake Cornelia continued to May 9, 2018. Commission Thorsen moved to continue the variance request for May 9, 2018. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Variance Request. 5801 Abbott Avenue, Edina, MN. Staff Presentation Planner Bodeker reported that Ron Sonnek with Sicora Design Build, the applicant, has submitted a 9.3-foot side yard setback variance at 5801 Abbott Avenue on behalf of the homeowners. The proposed project includes a whole house remodel, which involves constructing a second story above the existing first floor and building a Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 2 of 11 detached two-stall garage. To accommodate the proposed changes the applicant is requesting a variance due to the existing non-conforming setback on the north property line. Bodeker explained that the existing non-conforming setback on the north side property line is 5.7 feet. The zoning code requires a 15-foot side street setback. The applicant is asking for a variance to maintain the current 5.7-foot setback on the north side of the property while adding a second floor above the existing one story home. Bodeker concluded that staff recommends approval of a 9.3-foot side yard setback variance for the north property line at 5801 Abbott Avenue, subject to staff findings and subject to the following conditions: • Survey dated 1-29-18 (emailed to staff April 11, 2018) • Elevations and building plans date stamped March 16, 2018 • Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo. Appearing for the Applicant Ron Sonnek, Sicora Design Build Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Miranda moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions A comment was expressed that it was positive to see only an addition of a 2nd story vs. the teardown rebuild the Commission usually sees. Commissioners indicated that as presented the variance made sense, there was obvious non-conformity and the request was reasonable. Motion Commissioner Lee moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. 7250 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 3 of 11 Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the applicant, France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68-acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. As proposed, the development would include the following: A 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135-unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. Twenty percent (20%) of the unit area would be for affordable housing, which exceeds the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Retail & Office space totaling 19,000 square feet. Thirty-five (35) surface parking spaces for the retail use. Sustainability. LEED or Green Globe designation would be pursued. Pedestrian and vehicular access is proposed to the lot to the north (7200 France). Amenity terrace including a pool. Teague explained that the primary vehicle access points would be off France Avenue and Gallagher Drive. This access road would also serve the 7200 France site to the north to reduce traffic on 72nd, as has been recommended in previous development proposals for that site. Teague asked the Commission to note that the applicant has gone through the sketch plan process, and the Greater Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson of AFO, Architecture Field Office has provided a review as well. The applicant has responded to the development principles, AFO’s comments, and feedback received from the sketch plan, and has revised the plans as follows: Increased the Setback on France Avenue to 50 Feet at the base, retaining podium set back of approximately 10 more feet at floors 2-6 on the majority of the façade. Increased setback at rear property (west side) to bring access street out from under the building. Incorporated a walkway on the west side adjacent to the building and maintained the landscape buffer to the west. Build steps down along the west side to 5 stories with a setback at the 6th floor. Overall project size is approximately 8% smaller than the previous iteration. From 2.36 FAR to 2.18. North and west facades have greater development and improved pedestrian realm experience. Increased green roof area at 2nd floor plaza roof. AFO has reviewed the revised plans and offered the following: The building is now a “four-sided” building, whereby all four facades are treated as primary. The building’s relationship to the woonerf on the west side of the site is vastly improved, in that the drive is no longer underneath the building. The pedestrian pattern seems appropriate and thought out. The woonerfs on the west and north are pedestrian friendly, suggesting use by pedestrians first, bikes second, cars third and service vehicles fourth. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 4 of 11 The public realm design, including the variety in paving and landscaping depicted in the renderings reinforces the pedestrian experience. The scale and treatment of the public realm/pedestrian experience along France and Gallagher is open and flexible. The building’s northwest corner is better scaled in relation to the adjacent three story buildings. Teague told the Commission to accommodate the request the following is required: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and A Rezoning from POD-1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. In conclusion, Teague recommended that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District in the Greater Southdale Area from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and Approval is also subject to the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed-use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 5. The traffic study done by Wenck Associates concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. Teague noted he has provided findings for denial if the Commission so decides based on the following findings: 1. This area west of France and north of I-494 is considered a transition area between the high- density commercial development on the east side of France and the single-family homes to the west and north. 2. The density proposed is too high for the OR, Office residential district. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 5 of 11 Continuing, Teague recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1 based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site and connect to the Regional Trail and Fred Richards Park to the north. Provides the potential for additional public space along the north lot line in conjunction with Fred Richards Park; Opportunity to provide increased stormwater and ponding features in connection to Fred Richards Park; High quality building design; and The potential for significant affordable housing within the project. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 6 of 11 ii. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 8. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 28, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Of the proposed housing units, 20% must be dedicated for affordable housing and meet the conditions of the City’s affordable housing policy. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 18, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Wenck Associates Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 7 of 11 13. Dedication of public access easements along the west and north lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the property to the north, 7200 France Avenue. Appearing for the Applicant Dean Dovolis and Sheldon Berg, DJR Architects. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners raised the following: • It was pointed out that the proposal as submitted incorporates a number of the Greater Southdale Area Guiding Principles. Teague agreed, noting the favorable comments from Mic Johnson, Consultant. • A question was raised if the Commission can suggest a limited approval (Rezoning/Comp Plan). Approve the rezoning; and not approve an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague responded that can be done; however, the guide designation for this site is OR and that definition would not change if not amended. Teague said he was unsure if the proposal could proceed without that amendment. Amending the Comprehensive Plan in the areas guided OR would only allow (if certain conditions are met) an increase in density from the allowed 30-units. Any requests for rezonings, development plan, etc. would continue to need review and approval from the Commission and Council. • Planner Teague was asked if there was any consideration on increasing the height of the building along France Avenue because of its distance from the single dwelling unit district. Planner Teague responded he believes the applicant is satisfied with the building height as presented. • It was suggested for future projects that bus stops be highlighted. Teague agreed that was a good suggestion. • It was noted that the County was not very receptive to the City’s goal of creating “mini” blocks that would require access to France Avenue. Teague agreed that was true; however, the applicant indicated they would continue to petition the County for those cuts and would keep the north area between 7250 and 7200 France available for access to France. Applicant Presentation Mr. Dovolis addressed the Commission and informed them Planner Teague was correct in reporting that the County was hesitant to allow additional curb cuts onto France Avenue. Dovolis said in his opinion the County wants “superblocks”. Dovolis said he was aware that the City Council has been in talks with Hennepin County about France Avenue and the greater Southdale Area, adding he supports those talks and would appreciate it if the Council continued with those talks. Continuing, Dovolis reiterated that the County was hesitant to allow mid-block curb cuts; however, one was allowed in the Byerly’s redevelopment project. Dovolis said the County appears to respond on an individual site basis. With graphics, Dovolis highlighted the project as follows: • Increased setback on France Avenue. • The building is a “four-sided” building. • Podium setback of approximately 10 more feet at all floors 2-6 on the majority of the façade. • Increased landscaping. • Increased pedestrian amenities on France Avenue • Increased setback at rear of property (west side “woonerf). This brings the access-street out from under the building as depicted at Sketch Plan. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 8 of 11 • Overall size is approximately 8% smaller. • Increased Green Roof area. • North and west facades have greater development and improved pedestrian realm experience. • Indoor and outdoor bike parking stalls are provided. • Fast Charge EV Charging Stations are planned. • Enhanced Storm Water Management. • Provides affordable housing near commercial nodes. Ed Tehar, Wenck continued the presentation and agreed that there needs to be continued work with the County to allow additional curb cuts on France Avenue; however, Tehar said the site as proposed is designed to function if the curb cuts are not permitted. It was further pointed out the County has been allowing mid-block curb cuts on York Avenue. With graphics, Tehar highlight aspects of the traffic report. Continuing, Tehar noted that the traffic generated by the proposed development would have minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service movements. Tehar said if the County does not allow France Avenue access Gallagher Drive would result in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher intersection. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners expressed the following: • Concern was expressed that during peak hours a southbound turn onto Gallagher and a northbound turn onto Gallagher could become problematic. Dovolis agreed that certain movements could increase backup. It was suggested that signs be posted prohibiting turns during peak hours. Tehar said that step would only be effective if there was an enforcement element present. • Dovolis was asked the reason affordable housing was provided at 20%. Dovolis said in his opinion the 20% ratio works best in providing housing for support staff, teachers, etc. • Teague was asked if a rezoning to PCD would allow the project. Teague responded in the affirmative. Dovolis commented that the requested rezoning to PUD is the right designation for this site. Affordable housing is encouraged under the PUD zoning. • Staff was asked if the subject site were redeveloped to strictly office use would the traffic impact be less. Mr. Tehar responded that it would depend on the type of office use. If the use were medical office, there would be greater impact; however, if it were zoned straight office he believes the result would be comparable to what was proposed. • Mr. Dovolis was asked what would happen if the County prohibits additional curb cuts on France Avenue. Dovolis responded that he would continue to work with the County for this right. He said as previously noted that the site could function without the additional curb cuts; however, he feels confident curb cuts would be granted especially if 7200 were redeveloped. • It was suggested that more attention be paid to the west elevation. More articulation needs to be introduced. It appears too flat. • A suggestion was made to consider that all sides of the building appear active – consider more retail. • A concern was expressed about the woonerf on the north side of the building and if that area would be safe for pedestrians and bikers. Dovolis explained that around the building there are defined sidewalk areas to ensure safety for all pedestrians. With regard to bike trails, Dovolis stated they would need to work with the County especially along the south side and France Avenue. It was noted that it was Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 9 of 11 important for the project to be able to connect to the trails. Dovolis agreed adding the key is connections to cross the streets. • It was pointed out that the subject site is served by bus lines, adding it would be important for the residents of the building to be aware of this amenity. Dovolis agreed, adding they will work with the MTC on the possibility of providing protected bus stops. • Support was expressed for the project; to include its height, access, shadow study, affordable housing, building materials etc. • On the west side, ensure that the covered pedestrian pathway is a safe and desirable place to walk as it abuts vehicle space. Consider adding public art to that building wall and create a flexible space. Find a subtle way to also educate people Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. The following residents spoke for the project: • Mr. and Mrs. John Carlson, 4433 Ellsworth Drive, Edina, MN • Bill Griffith, representing the property owners of the Cedars Apartment Buildings. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions A discussion ensued on Affordable Housing, unit pricing and renters vs. property owners. It was noted except for the Estelle proposal, which was denied that all new housing in Edina appears to be rental. Teague agreed adding while the City has development policies; one being affordable units the decision by the Commission cannot be based on if the units are for rent or to own, luxury or market rate. Commissioners shared the following comments and opinions: • The project as proposed “hits” on a number of issues and has the support of the consultant for the Greater Southdale Area. A concern was expressed that it appears Hennepin County has a “big” say in France Avenue, noting if there was a weak point in this project it was the north side. Dovolis agreed, stressing they would continue to work with Hennepin County, adding he appreciates any help the City of Edina can be in securing the curb cuts on France Avenue. • The project is much improved from Sketch Plan. Great job! • The commitment to long-term thinking was much appreciated. • Continue to pay attention to the details of the project. The finishing details are very important. • Asked the Council to continue to support the goal of developing smaller blocks with access to France Avenue. • The project as presented meets the concerns expressed by the Commission and Council at Sketch Plan Review. A discussion ensued on the projects requested approvals especially amending the Comprehensives Plan OR designation. An opinion was expressed that re-guiding the entire OR district for just one project seems extreme. Teague stated the City’s policy is to amend/re-guide the entire district; it does not re-guide on a site- by-site basis. Teague explained that re-guiding the OR District does not mean that all OR designations can now have up to 80 units per acre. It only gives the properties designated OR the opportunity to achieve 80 units per Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 10 of 11 acre. Every parcel in the OR, Office Residential District that requests redevelopment would still be required to go through the process. Continuing, Teague said allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units; however, he reiterated re-guiding the designation does not mean, “blanket approval”. There is and will continue to be a public hearing process. The discussion continued on approval and if the Commission can require curb cuts as part of the conditions for approval. It was noted that if the County prohibits those curb cuts and the curb cuts were a condition of approval the project would not proceed. Dovolis stressed that he would continue to work with the County on the curb cuts, if not today in the future. He reiterated the project as designed functions without the curb cuts; however, it was acknowledged that the curb cuts are important. It was acknowledged that the Commission would prefer the curb cuts onto France Avenue as a condition of approval. However, Commissioners expressed the opinion that if approved without the curb cuts as a condition that that more attention be paid to the north side, better articulate and enhance it. It was also expressed that the project is best with access onto France Avenue. Motion Commissioner Hamilton moved to recommend preliminary approval of the rezoning and amendment to the Comprehensive Plan based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Thorsen. Ayes; Miranda, Thorsen, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Olsen. Nays; Olsen. Motion carried 8-1. VI. Reports/Recommendations None. VII. Community Comment None. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close public comment. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. VIII. Chair And Member Comments Commissioner Strauss said the 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan Group is continuing to review the final plan. When the plan is in its final form, it will be presented to the Commission and Council for comments. Commissioner Hamilton and Nemerov said volunteers are still needed to serve on the 50th and France Small Area Plan Work Group. The application deadline date is May 30th. Commissioner Lee announced there would be a Community Housing Forum held on Thursday, May 31, 2018 at the Southdale Library from 7-8:30 PM. IX. Adjournment Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 11 of 11 Commissioner Thorsen moved to adjourn the January 24, 2018, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 9:30 PM. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Jackie Hoogenakker Jackie Hoogenakker Jackie Hoogenakker Jackie Hoogenakker Respectfully submitted City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 501I' Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK 0 ALLEY PAVING 0 STORM SEWER 0 SANITARY SEWER q CURB AND GUTTER ONLY q PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER 0 WATER MAIN 0 STREET LIGHTING El OTHER: — See Below fieg/ 7R50 40,03 The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the b een SOW ed and LOCATION Of IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. U• 3o,rleee LO of Edi na, mM41.iv. the City Council 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. J. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. petition was circulated by: • WOOKIRMINSION6~.111 NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 To the Mayor and City Council: locations listed below. ADDRESS and and and ADDRESS ADDRESS an between and an an ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS between between between ME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NA ME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NA ADDRESS City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 501h Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEWED: Ph TITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL I I SIDEWALK ri ALLEY PAVING I 1 STORM SEWER P SANITARY SEWER I 1 CURB AND GUTTER ONLY I PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER WATER MAIN STREET LIGHTING OTHER: — See Below To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations 'listed below. IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS P TITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMP OVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: C(gkeP°'/Ille— - NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 NO 7: PLEASE READ THE 7250 prTITION ON THE LOME'S. F THE ii)OVER PAGE. TI-E..)%r IOU! 3-11-1-ciA41 6Li b LI riAmdi e ery This petition was circulated ( y: 1) NAME L/73 L%//51,a/99(.12-- 6/Y„.2 ?oZ DDRESS PHONE PHONE PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) The tvlinnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. A APRIL 2008 PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE 17-_,Eir-A11) THE 7250 Pn,Irr '\7 .7-1 PAGE. THS 7. This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 Er ace - 33 V VII VII V V V V II VVVVVV / 11 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL q SIDEWALK q ALLEY PAVING q WATER MAIN q STORM SEWER q SANITARY SEWER q STREET LIGHTING q CURB AND GUTTER ONLY q PERMANENT STREET 1:81 OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER — See Below — To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. K_6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. s petit' n was circulated by: Q c NAME lAcr 4-00 oaq_, R coa 1,C4L\ A DRESS PHONE his petition was circulated by: ,---- )?--QI W\ A NA E e-,c04 ADDRESS PHONE PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER PART OF THE COVER AGE THANK YOU! :Aav kAhFri-e. 1-4 (ir u\-Cet\i\--c---Ror, a A/40 ot)m)-fri- ouvvt litio-r2.e-kc-_,,/ ArrE, ii (4- 1 r Con,v\ e, Evi an 5 k_ri z.„4 75...)17 5v' NU, ClOv-AA---' kAsA6." V\1\a,v6, 11\1 ckkuf &.)ase,/,.-6 .4aS 144 vv0A Ja 1-c Av QS th./2.77-r R 751/ 4s0/ 6X(,;47/:-2, - --rt-tor-cA^P 6/301 C19-e&wit jive Us-(171 /41 The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform von of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL 0 SIDEWALK 0 ALLEY PAVING 0 STORM SEWER 0 SANITARY SEWER 0 WATER MAIN 0 STREET LIGHTING 0 CURB AND GUTTER ONLY 0 PERMANENT STREET 1:81 OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER — See Below To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. and and and and between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories148 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France ,from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: ISQ f\ A r4-- N E y 4504 QD0ANA\-z_ck Nu1S91 ADDRESS PHONE PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER ART'ra F THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! ‘.:<74/ C 6'7/3 - 22)2_ Chery I earl,/ / ?-(31 Opp, Terr, fil-A51-09 AL/4(174W f/5 - 41.5621_, /2)/7 -Pc9' y • 1-f -0 to 6 go - Kt re_ M ,1+ 5-Li 14,1 KA -e lor34 Cetrbyi e 41-ije/ 6C290 dieg779,/ leW 136ek-N l c. J4 Cifre -n4 Vc.A/ rem viocicv(c40, h45 6,(7, (Pfr--e /-\ f'V7 L r /7e da kos 7 c kesiYo"J ,4 S /2 I k_aiJcr- CQ 6 S C V€540V-, red r t.t(\o\4r 4g4 z„ ns petition was circulated by: iirzq v\5*-\ ADD SS PHONE NA The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 W City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL 0 SIDEWALK q ALLEY PAVING q WATER MAIN El STORM SEWER D SANITARY SEWER D STREET LIGHTING q CURB AND GUTTER ONLY q PERMANENT STREET 1,74 OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER — See Below — To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between between between between ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS In the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: V de-ILA 1 NAME '\1\/ 6—-oTs :512-Z -jqj ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER RT OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! 44140." G 4r r 7b mo4c-cd -s. 0,6k416( '1),41,010(t._ srt fra,J44',t oletkt, (04'C rii1442- 4J1-. \Cr -j>47N- Wirvzit i 2-- FD ebr• 2:77 c 012 711d/ W--r-7-f,4o rq r 44 °I 654 5 This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of'your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50 th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL I I SIDEWALK q ALLEY PAVING I 1 STORM SEWER 7 SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ri PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: q WATER MAIN STREET LIGHTING X OTHER: See Below The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. e, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: ADDRESS There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 NAME --9ec PHONE This petition was circulated by: 6 4, ,)ff -9-Z PHONE W 3 3 54 244 NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER PART OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! K OA s ct rov--et (-)4eif Koo.f L )01 RG, tvscifirivei qoelEttn 9A- (-:;•Al '441 a..A.CZ d t hiao t 1-P433 El 1scuo,i1 r4,-e L-Hqy -110 w.Ci4orf—Di: t/ 1 7 Lz.tt' Tit 1ite5 TZ-- "0 fing Ens wortb Dr, q‘17?7 Eiftl/uovitt. 1 At if FolG,L( Li 37 oupiitti 0-, be-, W37 t&- 4(07 9(//y z--/754,)/// The tlilinnesola Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) KnIFF: PLEASE RE' THE 7250 PEflTIOH ON I 7 OF THE COVER AGE. THA( YOUR 1* PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) HE 11P17---R This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this J61771. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL I I SIDEWALK 0 ALLEY PAVING q STORM SEWER q SANITARY SEWER n CURB AND GUTTER ONLY 7 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: WATER MAIN 0 STREET LIGHTING X OTHER: See Below The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations, listed below. LOCATION;OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS between and and and and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS between between between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: 01A KK CPpoira-kc._,9 bi ) .-way Bet5ivz_ gz_vi) NAME ADDRESS 15-2— —92 2 —6 53/f0 PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 atiNAO 137.1-on _ A MAI2.,01 700 7/714 Pie-r- iz i~ziz .3=t4-6-zoR QR, E - Cle-wonb:i (I WO Br t'S-KI B( 1,2 1 7, /4 5 /---,,L-ELI./_2s ) OP ii-ccAn4urn r-. 71 Og Rat:0\ff ki‘Tr.. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: L LEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWE — PART Ce THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! 11/, lq 4.(1 Rr6 )11. It) M6:_tir-e. eh PI( al D Ma) LOA ‘E-- /1/74- ( 0 7:77 C)4.- This petitiOn was circulated by: e//4 1114 /-14f1 r/Vo/ gAd f_C-2 -gz a-6 w o NAME ADDRESS PHONE The IlilinnesOta Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of pour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 /1' irT(/Ptia. ?-5" ec-75- \ L, e4m — 6 3L-] 117 A )/( --(/-( 7f-r: r; e4 7 b 3 all S /4q 73Ze) -7 z-o ,., W2 224/Z 4 3 0-(3 / (g1400 )tre 67 - 7V0 92 Z Z. 3:4) PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER PART OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! C0 12)24 12)/4 0,314 Or 'Y\t oir• ;e4cCIU 70D8 869. 15toj )311/1 967)---,431 -710-1 52_A2c--gac- (M-2_ W This petition was circulated by: IV1 "(c C/1/4 M 4/ n 7t 8Y rt'SYgg NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we infirm you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under thelaw, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 V atL City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50 th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL Li SIDEWALK q ALLEY PAVING STORM SEWER [1] SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY q PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: q WATER MAIN [I] STREET LIGHTING 'X OTHER: See Below The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE RE 0 THE 7250 PETITIC. ON ThE LOWE1 PART OF '1'HE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! (VOLAKA:---)401S 691 SOut+hc0-46:?_0 5+00/n 5sz L.).) 6 2/ 7 (r,- .1,4' Pr cpw s-vvz-zykal_12_ rd(,_ ‘126 inOvelk oal/' t-t2-cT 4/1411EL-L-E: 49/0- GO fi i/1/ n k kr r ,s / i 4 lee; ch faC)te 111-Lc6/4 Lc_ 17 D‘(1 9 6.11-`0 OA el."k) 14— oe 06e,u6A.) A-2 , 6p--)--s 0(17' /IP Lo 30 J -1rt- h_ :6 6 / 3 2 Cornebk r. LAI—) O yk)-r_s e"-3 Ji 1 \ Pec" t4,17 Atvi-/„-/ WVIeiest Ist;pa_. Mt& N i•Am &re e itY41,11 (,,2, Sk d This petit* was circulated by: (9-krt. VIA c4A3- NAME vi ) 0 k cits to—ev, ADDRESS PHONE The MinnesOta Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under thelaw, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 ' PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER PART OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! 5tAe1 qe1s (060g (1,()Ket(i -k D E--11\iy.A LN) 70 tt e_tikok qpir•L 6B Y -91,i,--eA ntrfrult,a-- 64-ga Pckrn‘QA A v to +32- A9&_cne-AC AOg. 1 '(;70c ,Saute, cao Pd ( za773-5-7A/tqctelka ct,4 avz 51;4464,/,‹_, iee/ 6 ct 50,-416 ked V Ljaricll erlo I<C1 r Sc. e l 1)-1c-11/w) S-a4)-1,tdcl,sz_. 17 a This petition was circulated by: qcvvkyv\. cikdr ) NAME 6e_' kni)44 /Aay-s \,\ a R ._30 L4, c,/6 °grit' &MI & 102 S - 4 1_ / PHONE S 0 AALR---c) ADDRESS bqc),?te autA)s.oYLJ-1. "7/G( COft(1,2-ki Or;v-e_ The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we infirm you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 1 1 t-7\ ta. ii A 1.1). Mo..0 ,1%.7"t•-( PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER PART OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! A-L4LkeZ UfrNt_i IKr^i 461\ 1166 it/1 / se Ed (4 ()1 /b/LiA-) tb4,, rg,J1 W74I6V"It /3eekl I•tAlye . raitl i[,Cna Pt YeF B 3ca3c,t s Sej C-re--po l 5E-t ss- 57 .3 j 2_, f.„ Ye_ Crci< //,'/C12'9,61.7Z41k 6425 Shosi,e Dr, &,3 13 Pe-6.-646_k. A u 5, c f / --Cc,u1-114(e, toe" I L I I eksQ. ct- J-11 s I (r; I c. i1- Cc AA Wa.z) taci 615 rcti.1--c- L4 .2 1-1Ave.11 e DYi ye. 4111 J&A1eL Le DR.. 114-Luu-4-4LN.9 161,4LA, I\4 a.,r i oklAK. Key\ c 1611/4 1 5 Fl I ky-ts1- 1-4.q t;V-Z) Ce.4?)tiLE r Ee ti JIM Kiktlen go 1er t ht ( This petition was circulated by: G6-1 lU c3 c, 614 (kR 0 ADDRESS 95D - a 9 - Z.. I PHONE NAME The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we infirm you ()limn,- rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 kq PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION OM 17 7: LC -. Mr. PAR OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! ,----------)--T-,. q_)„„ \c- \)v_., (1;70' V_ai1V--‘1\ )-4ki\ ,,, •-_, \‘..._,1)1,k L t4,6u/(j bAitilt 1-- He_ re (i 6 fd ? 69/A,,,,,--- ,,E. `'15- v--ircei &S Li 0 a t;L-t` vse' P /LA3 -4-iraTs'n L iece(a„4- R v6fe- t- 04i/ Gy-KJ07-‘ CA,a,—/e_s Car0 1146 OlAtti Cti,zL FY\ 6-1 Li() kLt av-et k \\kive Z ( 1 (kit- n Wt{kf (AY' t. 1. Li (-1-0 This petition was circulated by: iiXt*i0oiitt Dvi Low) br/ 09,s tk t,rms-1-1--(Ve.h,e4:17, [4 Co clgc- tAiccit-eA- Ui If 14 Arilb-eirlij 1,-,A:c_4 604 YV\ NAME G9 a o,.A-k 43L4 ADDRESS PHONE The MinnesOta Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the'l law, your telephone number is priVate data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 ert-r6tY T\6)14,oe_ r-- I-1-6«s ( NA Sir] (A) CW- Ae.p n VOin /9//cZ,-7-fe/7 (\)4 YlCibt s -C1-0,44C' Gpsr?,LA f -T‘f \ackvvic- rvu/Pflo' 71/1 : `fs-Ac 61N/ii -e PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON TG =I"" LC X117'1 )"El OF T[ lE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! ArP r-tadalli Arzaiimmart aft, 111111+ 1,, 4 °i f Pc elf c Li`s4- This petition was circulated by: rk.kA_ NAME ‘r--) ri)4 L ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this farm. Under thelaiv, your telephone number is private data. This petition wizen submitted will become public it formation. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL I I SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING I I STORM SEWER q SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY (7 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: WATER MAIN ri STREET LIGHTING rg OTHER: See Below The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed abOve to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 ADDRESS 7(51 (ts gvoitA, 51R1026.7") PHONE This petition was circulated by: g4/44L., NAME PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) EnTiEE: PEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER PART OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! rfc3b.,u4iLl .4. 4 kai 1)36, 61)014401 Ave cA-Gt-t1 7/30 6Lbacilesti1/917 731 CocAtl:e\ 11-1 41 Claremore .Or 2111--6 )/0„.4,,,t-e.„-AN, Dias- '112 4 gIrtAkul %IVA. DtActin? 6/ 2\4.: r Cv\1`;S:k_. Ehzedoe,VkjoyWf Volt, i°0 51.(t ) Mew ivez_`) The ivlinnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this Prin. Undeti the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refitsing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) WE IP,- EASE REA THE 7250 PETEITOON O THE LOWER 7.7 TEE COVER PAGE THAW If'Oqj This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this firm. Under the law, our telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK Uj ALLEY PAVING STORM SEWER J SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY n PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: WATER MAIN ri STREET LIGHTING 21 OTHER: See Below The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 F cnVM.1 PAGE THANK YOU! K-6( 71-2 /114'pm y co-0 C-W-Q,viActspi,„ L(0)-0 tlatdk PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PL «A NRiarip THE 7250 PETITION ON TKE LOWER This petition was circulated by: Ctd4 (-3QS/1-4tAna Wc)a(1-- (01(\ Li)s- NAME ADDRESS PHONE The A/finneSota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50 th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK STORM SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY I I ALLEY PAVING SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STREET LIGHTING OTHER: PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER N See Below To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION -OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: 7 9,-c d)2.4.,,, co, ---T7? NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 ,- 7 54-,3 0,9L) /1/ig Tic/ 4 V_ r CM-thin Awlagby-I' 4/1102D FPficteii Dr;v.e, Liti1170 fth othv-u PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: F_ EASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER PART OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! This petition was circulated by: C VV3 3 /ghlt}d/Mr- ?:>2 NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PF,TITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK I I ALLEY PAVING STORM SEWER I SANITARY SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY E PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: WATER MAIN II STREET LIGHTING xi OTHER: See Below The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-sto 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: u Ct ik L/93 3 E--//54br'gk. 001- -9,26 NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space'for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 C IMO 6takvv- bkat /t? PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON TI1 LO' ART O THE COVER EIPte. Tr :ANK YOU! t'7?‹ Z.-cv:rop eueetet.. I l ,2," 1 6-1,4/64-e__,S-1-e-1 ron44(a, _o n tf_Li )31-0,76 --H1,Cf 1/0 WDer U1 ,cfore ry 723 az /et/)1 ,7 d/Z-- 7Y 61 1V o7 O r/ This tion was circulated by: Pl3agc/( 026, -O.ys NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50111 Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY CO CIL SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING H WATER MAIN pi STORM SEWER E SANITARY SEWER pi STREET LIGHTING II CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET [Z OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER — See Below To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATIONOF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: 71712 0 d 7„2o Li A ft LA LAI .A1 ilaigji6eP NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 Al/ hkoe-L )2111(-n u ro( % Pk • -i): .0 it \elk.,k Rai i eitWq (CL \<gr\cPc. ?-eK_IA1(10 44/a/AaL. 5 3E.14 nvm ‘021iniz i61. A-11 S-ko n xd.14/ s 1st This peti tion was circulated by: .-771 U. t ? 7,). 0 1-1 OAS,L A xl NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) MOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITUON NAM OF I E C VER PAGE. THAN IK YOU * N THE LOWER `7.20 4 Fc /),/d 72o5 00-Law( ,44. 72aff Orip_kim Yutz- 12_ t ak.trA C.U1 Q. Ed iv 7020S- KI ct e ve r o C\ or{vmd“.4 C1- 7110u a 4 o Oh-if biAtikt 14A/( 5 30, frves* 0 ,-(wr. 7337 0(1k I (WM, 7-y(Va44-A-,_,A 7 3Z-I Oa-Hawn 41/Q,. —)7305 OILA-1 4,d( ?"30/ PaL/&a.cc-n6 -713/ Cor(t,eiio-ar 7)37 5 Se Luo t-c.t ,e 7.01,0ythA4uAet, $ia X39 6P9b PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the lazy, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) Fail SE READ THE 7250 PET! r:,OVEE ?AGE. THANK THE C„hri s4i e fde 77.4 goarnk, ((e,t, . /q'Lt. 4 ridliii`^ 7z z/ 7zzo e0{77( ,S-14-Sckil roc k S-4-uR 5mq 1( 6 i'cha p4 W. , L -12 (61`14q/vt (Z_, Co r vke 1; G_4-1 fohit t( •7(.2 )-i(P), 5 L.,) 5 Je Ude.±.3 0,0,frk $/6 L 71 I( 0 si 7Yx'y JA(nt Orz Dick ck. PO 00.cjA (1 .;3 r\vviuvo)it LJ -R-1 et -vz)ildv k, 'u.,2 1%M t k--"i 1(1'6A ('-dct-r-rt IN/AA P is cly Xt,,ss-d( 1j sit Yetticati meter K,e t( 75e,5 el -11u r Le, 7 9"e)1 /-,je /Ay? a-4,-e $ t/I s k6Lit,py -732-47i L9C4-. kr-tAM This petition was circulated by: "64A) i °sit lady 04 t.c t.../qtA04 til a P,99 b&qo HL-1 33 LAAktolifv0 NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) (PRINTED) E READ THE 7253 PETMON rr THE LOWER '71 TH .01%!/F.R PA GE. THANK Yk c*- L,e12 uh-t ,C&A-44. 7 (-I/ 7 e-etre &#fOI grp, Ayenk-e, This petition was circulated by: J-c`7 7../O9 1041-(LA NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this Ibrm. Under the law, your telephone munber is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL '4801 West 50 th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING STORM SEWER ri SANITARY SEWER F CURB AND GUTTER ONLY F-1 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ri WATER MAIN STREET LIGHTING f OTHER: See Below The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1 Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. Th i • petition was circulated by: bi3L4kyr NAME d, L/ ELLS paifig C1.5z,-956,-.24/Z,() ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) (PRINTED) iL)A-tk" NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LO!.." PART O THE C VEE{ ?Aela, THANK YOU! gthAdvbt Of51..,1-47) 1-160A0 111-12•1 ONO, b/2417-1 Ogoce . .rdiat Da- v(A, 1 70:3 7 5 419.1-1A 14-5 5'Lam. 6 A 4_ t L osT-0,1,3 77/11171 bA1/1 340-e'2)' 2,e> 'Bezri3 la* /6 07,1 ji<tc1117 ,54/A-0 1yx 4kone-4-1 )147-ei/L(__ batie e5› OcMty 71/1 R iv 'Mb La L. Sot /40•00,irai2 12 0. u1s1L 2-6 A 4 I er 4ral Ancovc,ii . o I 1.,1,/a (3f4-1_0 )0 1 14,1 ef,›7- 5, 'G ie , 7/bie-)-5 7020 t1J 5 I/0& Pf 11-5b' LLP)ihibr:i ) 1-5 -46 ki Eta-Z 14/ 41 /7 13e4.-/sciefe e/a/e/rk/(5 V5-7 e%)/erfLeA---.0 LOX ei(cor-ewlere_ 46-.3oZtilmfitm a.e.d etition was 144, irculated by: ttA4) NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50 th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: V PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK n ALLEY PAVING STORM SEWER n SANITARY SEWER Li WATER MAIN [7 STREET LIGHTING 1 CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET Xi OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. See Below between between between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: 0i3 deizu z LiJs Welk Da, qs-Z - -zy NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ THE 7250 PETITION ON THE LOWER A T OF THE COVER PAGE, THANK YOU! ..,- 112/lie hilLSTtriv.So4 - (45-6L( A Li/00,-, A4 -f r•iipe-- . Ati.ft Lm*e , azry .NiniruAnbc 40 INcy,nSzNym0 tt aoctusi5A/ e 0 ka ," \ 7. t/Vea /PA% 73v- 6-4, ct k te 73 12 I-Voo)010Lf -;'7Lii&'e a-ge -7 3C6 Ao-e 1 This petition was circulated by: (»-E47/E--k 6(-) flAbt 41421/ &I'61110M -t1 D,, ocKz ,9A NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, ,your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 Ct-k MEM 0 I '/ i3197,04hAtil LtS1 6 DiAnkoluiv\ Dr -3"21) A.94(Idate k7 Yel-u73 --72_0g woad; Ie P P S _ 72o 000.111, (\iu ).. City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50 th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL 1 I SIDEWALK STORM SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY I 1 ALLEY PAVING SANITARY SEWER PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER WATER MAIN E STREET LIGHTING 21 OTHER: See Below To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. 3. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. 4. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. Eleny_approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: S //j/TMeg 4 27/5-0 S6i)01.0-t 2-4Kr NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 /16(1z-&-c./- vi c rb,e;p7 zei/7---7-/ez-wf 1,Ar, A . Veliersei olkW iStr<() tz // t€L2Okie„,a): 4 / / kr 6 4ClA Wavoo-vA z.k g ) Arru ko 0 (1415 ,44' /(/v a,/ ci/r7 LA 11 I . vouvk k;civ.v.1 L b 4 )cr /fib, 7_, r) .S K 4 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) NOTE: PLEASE READ 71-=[117_ 7250 PET TION ON THE PART OF THE COVER PAGE. THANK YOU! _OWER L%/. 67.1/4/41 (is 14 secii,, 1/57 ell'Za 514'1 40e 111 VT t --\Cile-rN1-0, 75e,_,.; At / p 79 Qom- S 75 os /-(,//o , 7V. / 47/0,7 2-71P--e —PI H 141* I 1 or) 4a_ c 1-4-00 16 (A 1- . 'inn) 1(.4k1 /(6/-wtis 1/37; 44 „,"74/.4. Lis-0 s d ry 5 CtA -pore Kell° A ve Tiewa This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50 th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY CO CIL CURB AND GUTTER ONLY PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER E WATER MAIN E STREET LIGHTING OTHER: See Below SIDEWALK n ALLEY PAVING STORM SEWER E SANITARY SEWER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locationS listed below. between between between between and and and and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS LOCATIONFOF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATIONOF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. We, residents of Edina, petition the City Council to: 1. Maintain TRANSITION ZONES around Edina's single family residential neighborhoods to buffer them from taller buildings. 2. Bring back HEIGHT LIMITS in the Comprehensive (Comp) Plan that were recently abolished by the City Council for the 50th and France, Grandview, and Southdale Areas. Maintain the west side of France as a TRANSITION zone with HEIGHT limits of 4 stories/48 ft. Deny the Comp Plan amendment that would increase DENSITY on the west side of France from 12 - 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 5. Deny Comp Plan amendments and zoning changes that would permit developers to build high rises and skyscrapers along the west side of France. 6. Deny approval of the 7-story 7250 France project. This petition was circulated by: IvilloFREts NAME barvolm. 6R Pi04, ycz-D26-34,_ ADDRESS / PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) /1 HE L PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 44145 t.kiNf-1-41M iif ENNA `1414-5 D bunho IA Dr) Ed': if,q_ t-H2_1 bt,i,J A ctievn. Do_ Etii141 LLQ S(-4A-ic\an pfA,(Jor Ur; G)orci 14/ 15' b- 44- 3 2 Doso-//4/-7 19„4\r-i'l")Q 4 436- baphoat? 41-44- 6Lowtt • .# L 1.4.:46/1 fr/f /AR% --, IA( V DO YZA;(-) Sefen-- 00111 eat,f/y1L/ bctil/op ei its .44.4_se.i--t iSSe tia s c' gY(/ I OtIAA)970 44+1 bttelhaax 4)litti-k ,v ofzgautitctim ,-- zo-f zosarrapihrif 71 II "lawsimp.,0,24,124 411111 .., DaltliOM bK, M Obi 1.\/-A 9ip----.9 PHONE Qc-3 0-2 ADDRESS / The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition wizen submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 This petition was circulated by: MAK (V)/10FkEb NAME READ THE 7250 PEN ‘,00WEE PAGE. THAN.. eiets, W TS C itLF-TA_Qi-4 6-0 Lief) m cc-- 6' at 71 et)c-ein etc e_ EASE MEAD THE 7250 PETF. WE' F1 PAGE. THANr. Bow e 0/Ai A eoc s i/i(A ,vok- 6cu btc.c ' ALE ?, Oeikit, Oapio i51 L 1-1'1 ))vallick_jrn Y. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SIGNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) This petition was circulated by: PAAPI M/WFRP1 bt-AJWIIM Edi PA _92.c-3142- NAME ADDRESS tit PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we infirm you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the lain, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS SI GNATURE (PRINTED) (PRINTED) EASE READ THE 7250 PETOTIVOIM 9E LOWER PART OF THE COVER Riz\GE. THAM PA This petition was circulated by: MAN f\4AKIFRL6 buNt-v, EIA, 9S-z- NAME ADDRESS • N PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform von ofyour rights about the private data we are requesting on this Jbrm. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I I.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Ann Kattreh - P arks & R ecreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Arden P ark S ixty P ercent Des ign C heck-In Action, Disc ussion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: 1. Authorize staff to continue moving forward with the 90% design phase of the Arden P ark renovation project. 2. Authorize staff to finalize and publish E nvironmental Assessment Worksheet (E AW). 3. P rovide direction on Ash tree management as part of the project. I N TR O D U C TI O N: P lease review attached staff report and attachments. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report Public Engagement Boards Shelter Engagement Boards Draft EAW Draft EAW Exhibits Draft Maintenance Plan May 15, 2018 Mayor and City Council Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager Arden Park 60% Design Report Information / Background: On Aug. 2, 2017 the City Council received a final Arden Park concept plan report. The council elected to hold a public hearing at the Sept. 6, 2017 meeting. The council then approved the Arden Park concept plan at the Sept. 19, 2017 meeting with the following motion: Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the concept plan for Arden Park, authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign the agreement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and creating a public engagement process during the design process such as an Advisory Committee. On Nov. 21, 2017 the City Council approved a Community Engagement Plan for the design phase of Arden Park. Per the plan, the first report to the PARC and City Council at the 30% design stage occurred in January 2018. This is the second report back to the community, PARC, City Council and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. History: On Aug. 16, 2016 the City Council authorized a Memorandum of Agreement with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) to develop the Arden Park Concept Plan. The process to develop this plan included extensive public engagement. The concept was developed by an integrated project team that consisted members of the city and MCWD staff, and Parks & Recreation Commission, and consulting park and stream design specialists. The concept plan is an integrated project development that addresses needs in five categories identified in the 2015 Parks, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan. 1) natural resources, 2) trails, connections, health and safety, 3) park buildings, 4) playgrounds and play areas, and 5) community gathering areas. The plan is also consistent with and advances shared city and MCWD goals of environmental sustainability, clean surface waters, flood protection, wetland preservation, and improved habitat for wildlife. The concept planning process established following design goals: • Maintain rustic character of the park • Improve public experience throughout the park STAFF REPORT Page 2 o Increased fishing and in-stream recreation opportunities o Improved visual and physical access to Minnehaha Creek • Update aging park facilities • Public safety • Improved biological and geological function and value of creek and surrounding corridor • Regional stormwater management The approved 2017 concept plan represents a feasible and desirable integrated project scope that renews aged park facilities park paths, ,trail connections and in partnership with MCWD improvements to enhance stormwater and ecological health. Tree Removal Update and Ash Trees Based on the current status of 60 percent design, approximately 68 of 457 trees will have to be removed for construction. Tree removal during the concept phase of the design was estimated at over 90 trees for the creek remeandering alone. Twenty-four of the 68 trees slated for removal are ash trees. Of the 457 trees within the project scope, 77 are ash trees. Of the 77 ash trees, 47 have a DBH (diameter at breast height) less than 12” and 30 ash trees have a DBH greater than 12”. Of the 24 ash trees proposed to be removed for construction, 7 have a DBH of 12” or greater. City Forester Luther Overholt recommends injecting 3 trees in the park to prevent Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) and hopefully save the trees. Of these significant trees, one of the trees is along Minnehaha Boulevard, one is on Brookview Avenue and the other is close to the playground. It is also worth noting that a significant additional part of the Arden Park plan will be to remove buckthorn in the park. It should be recognized that the removal of this invasive species will significantly change the look of the landscape. Views of the creek are currently mostly blocked by thick stands of buckthorn. EAB-killed trees dry out quickly and become hazard trees in less time than after a normal tree death. Hazard trees are trees that can be dangerous because of the possibility of them falling over or large branches breaking off with a potential to cause personal injury to people. Minnesota Department of Agriculture considers May 1 – September 30 to be the flight season for emerald ash borer (EAB). This means that EAB adult beetles are emerging from infested wood or trees and flying in search of new hosts during this time. EAB larvae complete their development by pupating into adult beetles in the spring and early summer. However, this process only occurs when temperatures are sufficiently warm and the whole process requires a certain amount of accumulated heat – i.e., development time. This project provides a unique opportunity to remove and replace ash trees which will surely die eventually. Emerald Ash Borer has been found in all surrounding communities and was confirmed in Edina for the first time on Friday, April 13 2018. This first tree with EAB was identified on private property in northwest Edina. It is estimated that Edina has 50,000 Ash trees, most located on private property. The City Forester would like to remove as many of the ash trees as possible at Arden Park and replace them with much higher quality trees. It will be less expensive, less impactful to new park construction and easier to access many ash tree locations during project construction. While the larger trees with a DBH of greater than 12” have a greater impact to tree canopy, they are also more difficult, costly and dangerous to remove in future years as they die. The ash trees on the north half of the park would definitely be the most difficult and costly to remove in the future. It is recommended to remove at least those during construction. STAFF REPORT Page 3 At a joint work session with the City Council and Parks & Recreation Commission (PARC) on April 3, 2018 the Council asked the PARC to make a recommendation to the Council on Ash trees at Arden Park. At the April 10, 2018 Parks & Recreation Commission (PARC) meeting, Commissioners were asked to make a recommendation for the City Council on ash trees. The PARC was given the following options: a) Does the Parks & Recreation Commission support the removal of at least 50 of the 77 ash trees in the park project area? 24 of the 50 are part of the creek construction. This would remove approximately 94 total trees in the park. These trees would be replaced at a minimum of 1 to 1 with high value trees. This is 21 percent of the tree cover in the project area. OR b) Does the Parks & Recreation Commission support the removal of all 77 of the ash trees in the park project area? 24 of the 77 are part of the creek construction. This would remove approximately 121 total trees in the park. These trees would be replaced at a minimum of 1 to 1 with high value trees. This is 26 percent of the tree cover in the project area. The PARC passed the following motion: Motion made by Nelson to remove all 77 ash trees in the Arden Park project area to be replaced with one for one replacement with the largest size possible to fit park design and budget. Motion was seconded by Willette. Motion carried. 60% Design Phase Update The 60% design update will focus on creek alignment, trail alignment, stormwater management and natural resources enhancement strategies. The 60% design has added detail while staying true to the established design goals. The public engagement process helps restate the values of the community to inform the design. The design of the park shelter started in April. Eight residents are participating in the design process along with PARC commissioners Ites, Nelson, McAwley and Strother. The shelter design process will be completed this fall. The playground design process will begin with a request for proposal going out to potential playground vendors in May. A public engagement process to design the playground will take place between June and August. An open house to present the 60% update was held at Arden Park on Saturday, May 5. Feedback forms were collected at the open house and the presentation materials and the feedback form are available online as well. Another open house was conducted from 5:00 – 7:00pm prior to the PARC meeting and presentation on May 8 and the same presentation will be made to the City Council on May 15. Under the project agreement approved by the Council on September 19, 2017 the MCWD has provided a 60% design and preliminary cost estimate and draft maintenance plan for city consideration. The District is asking for input and concurrence on the design direction. Following City concurrence the District will proceed with preparing 90% design and cost estimates and return for City concurrence again before letting the project for bid. Prior to and following 90%, the City will review the project for compliance with grading STAFF REPORT Page 4 and land use permits and maintains the ability to terminate the agreement up until project award by the District. The 60% plan includes grading, stormwater, trails and coordination of the park shelter pad and utilities for the overlapping City project. The 60% plan does not yet contain all draft plan sheets, soils, soil quality, contamination, and groundwater elevation information or a cut / fill balance, as borings were just complete. Environmental Assessment The District has drafted the attached Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) because a stream diversion is a mandatory EAW classification (greater than 500’ of stream) and the City is the Responsible Government Unit (RGU) that will process the EAW application under State statute. An EAW provides information about the project, identifies areas of environmental impact and describes resource protection measures in the design, and assesses compatibility with local plans. Staff is seeking authorization to finalize the EAW and seek public comment by publishing for public review. Staff will edit the draft document to include soils information and publish. Following a 30 day comment period, staff will review comments received, and prepare responses to comments and a recommended decision will be returned for council consideration. Maintenance Plan Attached is a draft maintenance plan drafted by the MCWD. Upon completion of the park improvements, inspection and maintenance burden will be shared by the City and District according to this plan and a future agreement. This item is informational and will be finalized at the 90% check in. Budget The MCWD has prepared a 60% cost estimate. The following section summarizes the 60% estimate and notes areas of change from the concept estimate. The design team also has noted some risk in the estimate due to their perception of the market for bidding the job and is asking to increase the contingency held in the budget. The team will assess that risk and may propose alternate bid scope that could mitigate that risk. Item Concept Cost Estimate 60% Cost Estimate Difference Notes Facilities $1,284,000 $1,403,950 $119,950 City Trail/Sidewalk $335,000 $294,555 -$40,445 City Creek $1,313,600 $1,069,475 -$244,123 District Nature Trails / Bridges $497,000 $558,685 $61,685 Split Stormwater $890,000 $1,032,523 $142,523 Split TOTAL $4,154,600 $4,359,188 $39,588 City Total $2,322,500 $2,494,109 $181,609 The following are notable changes from the preliminary estimate for various scope of work: Park shelter; building +$150,000, Fiber optic to shelter building +$57,000, Utilities to building +73,000. Trail; Block retaining wall +$55,200, -$40,000 Brookview overlook, Nature trails; +28,000 boardwalk/helical piers. Stormwater; Bioretention raingardens, +165,000, Shelter LID elements -$138,735. STAFF REPORT Page 5 Next Steps: • Q3 2018 90% plan check in, final design and bidding • Q3-Q4 2018 Bid award • Q4 2018 Begin construction of creek, utilities and stormwater • Q1-Q2 2019 final construction of creek, utilities and stormwater, begin construction of trails and park facilities • Q2 2019 final construction of trail and park facilities • Q2-Q3 2019 final restoration creek, construct playground and shelter building Actions Requested: 1. Authorize staff to continuing to move forward with the 90% design phase of the Arden Park renovation project. 2. Authorize staff to finalize and publish EAW. 3. Provide direction on Ash tree management as part of the project. The PARC made and passed the following motion: a. Motion made by Nelson to remove all 77 ash trees in the Arden Park project area to be replaced with one for one replacement with the largest size possible to fit park design and budget. Motion was seconded by Willette. Motion carried. Attachments Public Engagement Boards • Overall Concept • Trails • Planting zones • Stormwater • 54th Bridge Channel • Creek Design Details • Tree removal Shelter Engagement Boards Draft Environmental Assessment Worksheet • Plans • Exhibits Public Comments Received Maintenance Plan May 7, 2018 ARDEN PARK Edina, Minnesota© 2018 HART HOWERTON. Th e designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. Th e drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. PRELIMINARY PLANTING RESTORATION 1/8 ac 1/16 ac 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 400' 1" = 50' at full size (30" x 42") 1 min. Walk MIN N E H A H A B L V D . 52ND STREET B R O O K V I E W A V E N U E O a k l a w n A v e n u e 53rd Street 54TH STREET A r d e n A v e n u e Bruce Pl a c e Park Shelter & Viewing Terrace GREEN SPACE Bridge Proposed Boardwalk Creek Access Existing Trail (8 ft.) Proposed Park Trail (8 ft.) Proposed Stairs Playground Proposed Nature Trail (4 ft.) Winter Skating Area Proposed Trail (6 ft.) Proposed Sidewalk (5 ft.) Existing Sidewalk (5 ft.) Existing Sidewalk (5 ft.) Proposed Sidewalk Extension (5 ft.) Creek Access Vegetated Drainage Depressions for Rainwater Fishing & Creek Access with Underground Treatment Repair Erosion Modified Trail for ADA Winter Ice Rink & Summer Dog Park LEGEND Forest/Natural Area Restoration Wetland/Floodplain Restoration Lawn May 3 2018 ARDEN PARK Edina, Minnesota© 2018 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. PAVING CONCEPT PLAN 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 320' 1" = 40' at 30" x 42" 1 min. Walk Draft Layout Draft Layout May 3 2018 ARDEN PARK Edina, Minnesota© 2018 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. PRELIMINARY PLANTING RESTORATION 1/8 ac 1/16 ac 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 400' 1" = 50' at full size (30" x 42") 1 min. Walk MIN N E H A H A B L V D . 52ND STREET B R O O K V I E W A V E N U E O a k l a w n A v e n u e 53rd Street 54TH STREET A r d e n A v e n u e Bruce Plac e Upland Zone Riparian Zone Biofiltration Zone Upland Zone Riparian Zone Riparian Zone Upland Zone Turf / Trees & Park Space Natural Area Management Existing Shelter and Bridge LEGEND Upland Zone Riparian Zone Biofiltration Zone 888 890 886 884 878 880 882 884 886 882 888 886 884 882 880 878 877 877 PARK SHELTER FFE 866.1 LANDING BOARDWALK RENOVATED PARK LAWN RE-CONFIGURED ICE RINK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FLOODPLAIN FOREST FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FLOODPLAIN FOREST FLOODPLAIN FOREST LANDING CREEK ACCESS RELOCATE UTILITY POLE RELOCATE HYDRANT # # # # # # # # # # 5 / 1 / 1 8 # # # # # # 7 0 0 7 - 0 0 0 2 A R D E N P A R K E D I N A , M N P r e l i m i n a r y N o t f o r C o n s t r u c t i o n O V E R A L L S T O R M S E W E R A N D B M P P L A N C - 5 0 1 STORM WATER FROM OFF-SITE 85 ACRES DIVERSION STRUCTURE DIVERSION STRUCTURE PRE-TREATMENT STRUCTURE OVERFLOW TO CREEK INFILTRATION TRENCH SPLITTER STRUCTURE BIORETENTION FILTRATION SWALE CELL FILTERED STORMWATER DISCHARGE TO CREEK FILTERED STORMWATER DISCHARGE TO CREEK UNDERGROUND FILTRATION FILTERED STORMWATER DISCHARGE TO CREEK STORM WATER FROM OFF-SITE 5.7 ACRES STORM WATER FROM OFF-SITE 1.9 ACRES STORM WATER FROM OFF-SITE 1.9 ACRES BIORETENTION FILTRATION SWALE CELL BIORETENTION FILTRATION SWALE CELL BIORETENTION FILTRATION SWALE CELL STORM WATER BMP DESIGN STORM WATER FILTERED THROUGH BIORETENTION FILTRATION SWALES TO REMOVE TSS AND PHOSPHOROUS SWALES DESIGNED TO DRAIN DOWN WITHIN 48 HOURS SWALE PLANTINGS TO MATCH OVERALL PARK DESIGN DESIGN WATER QUALITY SUMMARY CONTRIBUTING AREA = 94.5 ACRES TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS REMOVED = 8 TONS/YR TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS REMOVED = 30.9 LBS/YR Low Flow Channel Concrete Concrete Rounded Cobble Existing Channel Bottom 54th St Bridge 54th St Bridge Existing Area beneath 54th St Bridge Proposed Area beneath 54th St Bridge High Scouring Flows (800 cfs) Modelled Elevation 861.39 ft High Scouring Flows (800 cfs) Modelled Elevation 861.49 ft Low Flow Channel Proposed Conditions Flow 800 cfs Channel Shear = 0.07 lb/sq ft Velocity = 1.96 ft/s Flow at 800 cfs Channel Shear = 0.15 lb/sq ft Velocity = 6.54 ft/s Flow at 800 cfs Channel Shear = 0.11 lb/sq ft Velocity = 2.08 ft/s Flow at 800 cfs Channel Shear = 0.75 lb/sq ft Velocity = 4.65 ft/s Existing Conditions Cut low flow channel through existing concrete apron beneath 54th ST Naturalize low flow channel with rounded cobbles Low flow channel facilitates fish and canoe passage Channel shear and velocity maintain existing fishing hole Arden Park Restoration 54th ST Bridge Channel 54th ST 54th ST Mi n n e h a h a Cr e e k Mi n n e h a h a Cr e e k Creek Design Details Pools - Deep slow flow - Logs provide habitat complexity - Provide refuge during dry conditions - Provide fish habitat Riffles - Fast shallow flow - Rocks provide habitat complexity - Promotes oxygenation of water - Provides fish spawning area 52nd Street52ndStreet 53rd Street 54th Street J u a n i t a A v e n u e I n d i a n o l a A v e n u e Arden Avenue K e l l o g g A v e n u e O a k l a w n A v e n u e B r o o k v i e w A v e n u e Park Place M i n n e h a h a B o u l e v a r d ¯0 250Feet Arden Park Restoration Project Proposed Channel Area of Potential Effect Ash Trees > 12 inch DBH Ash Trees < 12 inch DBH Ash Trees inoculated Trees removed for construction Unaffected Trees Notes:1. Proposed tree removals for construction based onpre-60% design plans and are subject to change asdesign develops2. Aerial imagery from MnGeo WMS service 2016color 7-county ARDEN PARK Edina, Minnesota SHELTER BUILDING CONCEPT May 5, 2018 FORM STUDIES BUILDING MATERIAL OPTIONSEXISTING PARK BUILDINGS 55 OCC HD HD HD HD 1725 SF - building footprint 2500 SF - including covered outdoor space ORIGINAL FOOTPRINT 936 SF PAMELA PARK MAIN PROGRAM 1840 SF ADD. STORAGE 450 SF WELL HOUSE 365 SF TOTAL − 2650 SF COUNTRYSIDE PARK MAIN PROGRAM − 1680 SF OUTDOOR SPACE − 540 SF TOTAL − 2220 SF ARDEN PARK EXISTING BUILDING − 936 SF WALNUT RIDGE & TODD PARKS EXISTING BUILDING − 1 0 SF CORNELIA & WEBER PARKS EXISTING BUILDING − 1 0 SF WOODDALE PARK EXISTING SHELTER − 600 SF PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 1900 SF + COVERED OUTDOOR SPACE 4 168 36 2 PAMELA PARK PAMELA PARK PAMELA PARK COUNTRYSIDE PARK WALNUT RIDGE PARK VIEWS NEW SHELTER BUILDING CONCEPTS V I E W S 1890 SF - building footprint 2490 SF - including outdoor space Open House presentation board HD HD 68 OCC VIEWS OPTION A [68 OCCUPANTS] 1890 SQ. FT. BLDG FOOTPRINT 2490 SQ. FT. INCL COVERED OUTDOOR SPACE CEDAR SIDING STONE BASE FIBER CEMENT SIDING GREEN ROOF ASPHALT SHINGLES CEDAR SHAKE METAL ROOF OPTION B [55 OCCUPANTS] 1725 SQ. FT. BLDG FOOTPRINT 2500 SQ. FT. INCL COVERED OUTDOOR SPACE TOWARD PLAYGROUND T O W A R D F I E L D / F R E E S K A T E TOWARD BRIDGE & RINK VIEWS V I E W S VIEWS TOWARD PLAYGROUND T O W A R D F I E L D / F R E E S K A T E TOWARD BRIDGE & RINK P A T H P A T H BATHROOMS COMMUNITY ROOM MECHANICAL CIRCULATION BLDG FOOTPRINT ROOF LINE OUTDOOR SEATING DRINKING FOUNTAIN TALL STORAGE CABINETS ENTRANCES PLAN KEY 1890 SF - building footprint 2490 SF - including outdoor space OPTION E 1740 SF - building footprint 2340 SF - including outdoor space OPTION E-2 1560 SF - building footprint 2160 SF - including outdoor space Can also work w/ bathroom layout in Option E Can work as mirror image w/ mech room to south OPTION E-3 1380 SF - building footprint 1980 SF - including outdoor space HD HD HD HD HD HD HD HD OPTION E-4 68 OCC 65 OCC 48 OCC 47 OCC HD HD HD HD including OPTION E-4 55 OCC HD HD HD HD 1660 SF - building footprint 2400 SF - including covered outdoor space Can also work w/ bathroom layout in Option E OPTION E-4 55 OCC HD HD HD HD 1725 SF - building footprint 2500 SF - including covered outdoor space Can also work w/ bathroom layout in Option E (B)(C) page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET This Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) form and EAW Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board’s website at: http://www.eqb.state.mn.us/EnvRevGuidanceDocuments.htm. The EAW form provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW Guidelines provide additional detail and resources for completing the EAW form. Cumulative potential effects can either be addressed under each applicable EAW Item, or can be addresses collectively under EAW Item 19. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project title: Arden Park Restoration Project 2. Proposer: 3. RGU Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and City of Edina City of Edina Renae Clark, Planner-Project Manager Ross Bintner, 15320 Minnetonka Boulevard Engineering Services Manager Minnetonka, MN 55345 7450 Metro Boulevard Phone: 952-641-4510 Edina, MN 55439 Fax: 952-471-0682 Phone: 952-903-5713 Email: rclark@minnehahacreek.org Fax: 952-826-0392 Email: rbintner@edina.mn.gov 4. Reason for EAW Preparation: (check one) Required: Discretionary:  EIS Scoping  Citizen petition X Mandatory EAW  RGU discretion  Proposer initiated If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number(s) and name(s): Minnesota Administrative Rules 4410.4300 Mandatory EAW Categories, Subpart 26, Stream diversion > 500’ 5. Project Location: County: Hennepin City/Township: Edina PLS Location (¼, ¼, Sec.18, Township 028N, Range 24W Watershed (81 major watershed scale): Upper Mississippi River Basin GPS Coordinates 44.907606°, -93.333572° Tax Parcel Number: 1802824430095, 1802824430097, 1802824440001, 1802824440002, 1802824430096, 1802824420003, 1902824120158, 1902824110063 page 2 Attachments to the EAW: 1. County map showing the general location of the project; 2. U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries 3. Project Plans (DRAFT) 4. Wellhead Protection Exhibit 5. Arden North Catchment Stormwater Exhibit 6. Arden South Catchment Stormwater Exhibit 7. Wetland Delineation Map 8. Tree Survey Map 9. Groundwater Map 10. Bedrock Map page 3 6. Project Description: a. Provide the brief project summary to be published in the EQB Monitor, (approximately 50 words). Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) is proposing restoration of 14.5 acres of urban Minnehaha Creek Corridor within the City of Edina through the removal of a 4-foot high dam in Minnehaha Creek, restoration of approximately 2,000 linear feet of stream channel and approximately 90 acres of regional stormwater watershed treatment. The project also includes replaced and add new trails with improved accessibility and replacement of a park shelter building and playground. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction, including infrastructure needs. If the project is an expansion include a description of the existing facility. Emphasize: 1) construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes, 2) modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes, 3) significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures, and 4) timing and duration of construction activities. The Arden Park Restoration Project includes the restoration of approximately a 2000 feet section of meandering stream in Minnehaha Creek, including the removal of a 4-foot high dam; approximately 90 acres of regional stormwater management through underground filtration and above-ground filtration swales; construction of new and replacement trail, sidewalk, and boardwalk; demolition and replacement of a park shelter building and playground; and natural area restoration through invasive species removal, planting and management. This project is centered around a restored Minnehaha Creek channel which has been impacted from an existing dam installed before 1938. Restoration techniques include excavation for dam removal and re- shaping the creek cross section within the existing impoundment area. The dam removal and new stream cross section will provide new habitat, stream function and ecological value. Creek banks will be reconstructed using fabric encapsulated soil lifts and other soil bioengineering techniques including the incorporation of large wood for stabilization and habitat. Bioengineered bank construction is accomplished by confining soil with a combined layer of both woven and non-woven biodegradable coir fiber blankets. Native vegetation establishment is a critical part of the project, with native plant root systems growing and replacing the biodegradable fabrics over time. Large woody habitat will be secured and incorporated into banks to provide unobtrusive fish and macroinvertebrate cover, to help define banks and also allow for the natural maintenance of pool habitat. The inside of meander bends will be stabilized by grading and shaping of banks and trenching of biodegradable erosion control fabrics. Between meander bends, small gravel will be incorporated into riffles to provide suitable substrate for fish spawning. Sediment transport analysis will ensure proper sizing of riffle material to minimize deposition of fine material in areas in pools and on riffles and prevent bank erosion and riffle migration. Excavated soil will be stockpiled on site and managed in accordance with the plans and specifications. The total excavated quantity for all site construction is approximately 16,800 cubic yards. Approximately 4,000 cubic yards will be regraded on site as fill for former channel areas, creating new creek banks, and grading within the upland park areas. The remaining material will be hauled off-site and disposed of in accordance with the plans and specifications. Recorded Creek flow varies depending on the time of year and operation of Gray’s Bay dam outlet structure from Lake Minnetonka to Minnehaha Creek. According to the Operating Plan for Gray’s Bay page 4 dam, the structure is closed during winter months typically from December – March. Creek construction is planned to occur during the timeframe between December and March when Creek flow is at its lowest. It is likely that some dewatering or diversion of the creek flow will be needed. This can be accomplished through coffer dam construction and pumping, or through the construction of diversion channels or water diverting barriers. Groundwater in the project area, if a significant issue during winter construction, will be pumped out of the constructed area into temporary basins established onsite in accordance with guidelines set forth in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) water appropriation permit conditions for stream construction dewatering. If the bioswales are utilized as temporary basins for dewatering, they will be scarified and ripped to at least 3-feet to improve infiltration and groundwater connectivity. Soils in the project area will require special construction techniques for wetland stream channels. The channel will be constructed in segments between 100-500 feet in length by building a temporary haul road over the proposed channel alignment or across the existing lawn surface in the park. This temporary road may be composed of wood or plastic mats, or could be lined with geotextile fabric and a layer of gravel or wood chips. Construction equipment will travel up and down the temporary road, thus minimizing impacts to the surrounding park and wetland surface. Channel construction will be primarily from the east site of the park from Minnehaha Boulevard. This basic plan may have some variation in methodology depending on the contractor used. Staging of stockpiles and construction equipment and material will occur within the upland area on the east side of Arden Park with ingress/egress anticipated off of Minnehaha Boulevard. New constructed channel segments will be connected to the existing ditch when the new constructed channel segments are established with all erosion control measures in place. Once this temporary connection is made, the Minnehaha Creek flow will be diverted on the upstream end into the new channel. The old channel segments will be partially filled with onsite soils, creating depressional wetlands. Old channels are susceptible to being recaptured by the stream during flood flows in channel restoration projects such as this one. Thus, partial filling is required to raise the old channel bed. The need for partial filling of the old channel will allow for re-use of some material during construction and reduces the need for off-site disposal of excavated soils. This fill area will also provide a base for roughness elements such as large wood to help prevent channel avulsion (stream recapture) during flood events and will also provide reptile, amphibian, mammal, and bird habitat. The channel ends will be secured and stabilized with the same bioengineering techniques used in the channel construction. Flow will be diverted from active construction areas using sediment booms and other pre-approved methods for in-stream construction if there is significant flow during the winter construction period. Stormwater best management practices (BMPs) will be constructed as part of the Arden Park Restoration Project to capture and treat drainage from an 85 acre drainage area north and east of the site and a 5.7 acre drainage area south and west of the site as shown on the attached Stormwater Catchment Exhibits. BMP’s for the drainage area northeast of the site include diversion structures that route flow from existing storm sewer to a SAFL Baffle for pretreatment, which outlets to above ground filtration swales which will drain and discharge to Minnehaha Creek. (Exhibit X). The above ground filtration swales consist of five cells. The swales are designed such that one to two feet of storm water are detained and filtered through sand media, which removes phosphorus and suspended sediments. Filtered stormwater is collected by drain tile, which discharges the treated water directly to the Creek. Approximately one third of the flow is routed to page 5 Cell 1, the westernmost cell. Cell 1 overflows and discharges directly to the Creek at a depth of approximately 1.1-feet. Two thirds of the flow is routed to Cell 2, the northeastern-most swale. Overflow from Cell 2 discharges to the south to Cell 3, which discharges to Cell 4, which discharges to Cell 5, which overflows to the Creek. Outlet invert elevations were designed such that the swales will drain dry up to the two-year flow event on the Creek. The BMP for the southwest drainage area consists of a diversion structure, a SAFL Baffle for pretreatment, and an underground filtration basin. The filtration basin is sized such that the first flush of sediment and phosphorus rich runoff is diverted to the basin for treatment; high flow with relatively clean runoff bypasses the treatment device and discharge directly to the Creek. Like the above ground swales, a layer of sand media will be used to filter runoff, removing phosphorus and sediment. Filtered stormwater is collected by drain tile, and discharges to the Creek. Existing storm sewer elevations and the surrounding topography were taken into consideration to locate the underground storage system such that positive drainage is maintained, and adequate cover is provided. Downstream outlets are set such that the BMP will drain dry up to the two-year flow event in the Creek. Stormwater BMP construction will consist of excavation, site grading and a planting plan and is anticipated to begin spring of 2019 following creek construction. Trails, sidewalk and boardwalk will be constructed beginning spring 2019. Layout, typical construction details and proposed surfaces are shown on the Project Plans. Trails are providing increased circulation, handicap accessibility by reducing slopes of existing trail access points, promoting public safely by adding new sidewalk along Brookview Avenue, and providing a connection to natural areas. Two new bridges are proposed as shown on Project Plans. The southern bridge in the center of the park replaces and existing bridge. The northern bridge constitutes a new creek crossing for pedestrian circulation. Both bridges will be steel beam construction on concrete foundations with helical supports. Bridges are designed to provide three feet of freeboard between to 100 year high water elevation and lowest cord. The north bridge will be pedestrian only and consist of a 6-foot wide bridge deck with an approximate 50’ span. The south bridge will be for pedestrian and maintenance truck traffic and consist of a 10 foot wide bridge at approx. 65’ span. Both bridges will be constructed of weathered steel beam with wood railings and painted steel posts. Bridge abutments will be poured concrete and may include spread footing or helical pile foundations, depending on soil conditions. A boardwalk approximately 200 Feet in length will be constructed through forested floodplain on the northwest portion of the park to provide a pedestrian connection and circulation. The boardwalk will be elevated 1foot above the floodplain forest for the first ~100 ft. to facilitate flow passage during high flow events. Construction for the boardwalk will include installation of helical supports with a small, tracked machine and hand construction of wood decking and associated railing. Helical supports will be spaced approximately every 12 ft. The boardwalk deck will consist of pressure treated wood with wood railings and painted metal gridded guard between wood posts. The project area currently has two canoe launch locations, one on each side of W. 54th Street. The launch south of W. 54th Street will be eliminated. Three new creek access points will be constructed as part of the creek restoration. Access will accommodate in-stream recreation within the park such as tubing and kayaking loops while also proving a canoe/kayak launch site on this regional recreational system. Natural area and vegetation management will include buckthorn and invasive species removal and management, primarily within the wooded area on the west side of the park. Phasing of removals and page 6 management will be considered to reduce erosion potential. The project includes will include a robust planting plan. Planting and natural areas management will be implemented in accordance with a Management Plan to be prepared in concurrence with design. A tree survey for the project site was completed which identifies 457 trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) of eight inches or greater. An estimated 68 trees will be removed as part of construction activities. Of the 68 trees anticipated to be removed, 24 are ash trees (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). There are a total of 77 ash trees surveyed. Emerald ash borer has been confirmed in surrounding communities and will eventually impact ash trees on this site. As part of site restoration, an ash tree management plan will be developed which includes treating specimen trees – three have been identified – and taking ash trees to the extent practical and feasible as to be determined during project design. Trees removed as part of project construction will be reused on site as woody habitat in creekbank construction. A planting robust revegetation plan will be implemented as part of the project, replacing trees at a minimum of 1:1 ratio. The final site grading plan will establish preliminary grades for a new shelter building and playground structure. Construction of these new facilities is preliminarily planned to occur August – November 2019 following substantial completion of the creek restoration, site grading, planting and vegetation establishment plan, stormwater facilities, and trails. The project is planned to begin January 2019 and is expected to be substantially complete November 2019. c. Project magnitude: Total Project Acreage 19 Acres Linear project length 1,924 Feet (stream) Number and type of residential units N/A Commercial building area (in square feet) N/A Industrial building area (in square feet) N/A Institutional building area (in square feet) 1800 Other uses – specify (in square feet) Structure height(s) 30’ d. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. Minnehaha Creek is a regional, recreational and ecological system that is part of a 47 square mile geography which includes five urbanized cities including Minneapolis and the Chain of Lakes. The project serves local community members, canoers and kayakers from the Twin Cities region and beyond. Development in the Minnehaha Creek watershed has significantly changed the hydrology, resulting in increased storm water volumes and flow peaks compounded by reduced infiltration and base flow. Wetlands and depression storage that naturally extend the period of flow have largely been eliminated in the Minnehaha Creek watershed. Large volumes of surface runoff are produced by impervious surfaces and are discharged over a short period, increasing peak discharge rates and increasing polluted runoff to the Creek system and downstream. Also as a result of urbanization, the creek has been ditched and the surrounding corridor has been fragmented. Minnehaha Creek and Lake Hiawatha appear on Minnesota’s §303(d) list of impaired waters for E. coli, chloride, and dissolved oxygen, as well as due to its impaired page 7 biological community. Downstream Lake Hiawatha is impaired due to excess nutrients. In response, a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) has been developed to address these impairments. e. Are future stages of this development including development on any other property planned or likely to happen?  Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. f. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project?  Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. 7. Cover types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development: Before After Before After Wetlands (total) 6.2 6.7 Lawn/landscaping 3.7 1.9 Deep water/streams 2.5 1.9 Impervious surface 1.0 1.2 Wooded/forest 4.5 4.5 Stormwater Swales 0 0.5 Brush/Grassland - - Other (Floodplain Forest) 2.5 3.5 Cropland - - Other (Fresh – Wet Meadow Wetland) 0.3 1.3 Other (Shallow Marsh / Deep Marsh Wetland 0.8 0 TOTAL 21.5 21.5 8. Permits and approvals required: List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals, certifications and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. All of these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410.3100. Unit of government Type of application Status Government Unit Type of Application Status U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit for impacts to navigable waters/jurisdictional wetlands Application to be submitted (Included in the DNR Public Waters Work Permit) City of Edina Permit to work in city property Application to be submitted page 8 Floodplain No-Rise Application Approval Application to be submitted Grading Permit Application to be submitted Building Permit Application to be submitted Approval of Planting Plan Application to be submitted to City Forester Conditional Use Permit Application to be submitted if needed (removal or exporting of fill in excess of 400 cubic yards) Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) MPCA dredge disposals confirmation of no permit required. Confirmation will be made prior to construction NPDES general permit for discharge of stormwater during construction activities Application to be submitted Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Public Waters Work Permit Application to be submitted Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Wetlands Conservation Act determination Application to be submitted Combined Joint Notification Water Resource Application Form (includes permits for: Erosion control, stormwater management, floodplain alteration, dredging, wetland alteration, waterbody crossing and shoreline/streambank improvements Application to be submitted Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Landowner Statement and Contractor Responsibility for Work in Wetlands or Public Waters Application to be submitted Cumulative potential effects may be considered and addressed in response to individual EAW Item Nos. 9-18, or the RGU can address all cumulative potential effects in response to EAW Item No. 19. If addressing cumulative effect under individual items, make sure to include information requested in EAW Item No. 19 9. Land use: a. Describe: i. Existing land use of the site as well as areas adjacent to and near the site, including parks, trails, prime or unique farmlands. The project area is approximately 14.5 acres and is designated neighborhood parkland owned by the City Edina. Approximately four acres are maintained parkland as grass which includes sidewalk, bituminous trail with a bridge over Minnehaha Creek, hockey rink, playground, and creek canoe access. The remainder of the site includes open water wetland and creek and forest. The Site is bordered by City streets and single family residential development with on street parking. page 9 ii. Plans. Describe planned land use as identified in comprehensive plan (if available) and any other applicable plan for land use, water, or resources management by a local, regional, state, or federal agency. In 2015 the City of Edina adopted a Strategic Plan for Parks. The proposed project in Arden Park aligns with the Strategic Plan goals which include: protect, enhance and restore the City’s natural resources and natural areas, create more resilient and sustainable parks, facilities and landscapes, protect and restore Edina’s water resources, and increase facility accessibility and consistency throughout the City. The project is also consistent with key recommendations from park assessments which include: • Provide greater access for passive recreation and interpretation. • Protect and improve Edina’s water resources. • Provide more environmental education opportunities. • Replace insufficient play areas/playgrounds and provide new facilities to fill gaps. • Improve branding and wayfinding to parks. • Provide additional community gathering areas. • Develop community driven master plans for parks. • Replace or decommission community park buildings that have outlived lifespan. A Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) plan for Minnehaha Creek and downstream Lake Hiawatha to address impairments of Minnehaha Creek and Lake Hiawatha which include E. coli, chloride, dissolved oxygen, and biological community for Minnehaha Creek and excess nutrients for downstream Lake Hiawatha. Removal of the existing dam at W. 54th Street, the ecological restoration of Minnehaha Creek to recreate natural stream function and processes, and regional stormwater management are proposed to achieve progress towards the TMDL. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District’s 2018 Comprehensive Plan, section 3.9.8 identifies this project within the Minnehaha Creek Subwatershed Implementation Plan. iii. Zoning, including special districts or overlays such as shoreland, floodplain, wild and scenic rivers, critical area, agricultural preserves, etc. The project site has a designation of OpenSpace and Parks surrounded by Low Density Residential within the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan (2008). b. Discuss the project’s compatibility with nearby land uses, zoning, and plans listed in Item 9a above, concentrating on implications for environmental effects. The propose project is a natural resources restoration project to improve the biological and ecological function of Minnehaha Creek through Arden Park while providing enhanced park user experience consistent with the goals identified in the City of Edina Strategic Plan for Parks (2015). c. Identify measures incorporated into the proposed project to mitigate any potential incompatibility as discussed in Item 9b above. The project does not change current land use and is consistent with current zoning. page 10 10. Geology, soils and topography/land forms: a. Geology - Describe the geology underlying the project area and identify and map any susceptible geologic features such as sinkholes, shallow limestone formations, unconfined/shallow aquifers, or karst conditions. Discuss any limitations of these features for the project and any effects the project could have on these features. Identify any project designs or mitigation measures to address effects to geologic features. Bedrock underlying the project area consists of middle Ordovician sandstones, limestones and shales (Depth to Bedrock figure) at a depth of approximately 60 ft. (https://umn.maps.arcgis.com/apps/StorytellingSwipe/index.html?appid=c36a3951cc174e6f9bdee7514b1 1b7e7). Since no shallow bedrock is present in the project area, no any susceptible geologic features are identified. b. Soils and topography - Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications and descriptions, including limitations of soils. Describe topography, any special site conditions relating to erosion potential, soil stability or other soils limitations, such as steep slopes, highly permeable soils. Provide estimated volume and acreage of soil excavation and/or grading. Discuss impacts from project activities (distinguish between construction and operational activities) related to soils and topography. Identify measures during and after project construction to address soil limitations including stabilization, soil corrections or other measures. Erosion/sedimentation control related to stormwater runoff should be addressed in response to Item 11.b.ii. Soils primarily consist of U5A – Urban land Udorthents with L52C – Urban land-Lester complex around the periphery of the project site. Topographically, the project area primarily consists of valley bottom with steep slopes along the western edge of the project area. This topographic change is associated with a transition from hummocky glacial moraine deposits, to relatively flat glacial-fluvial outwash deposits. Minnehaha Creek runs along this boundary for much of its length. Two trails will be constructed along the valley slope with the remainder of construction occurring on relatively flat valley bottom and bluff top. Approximately 7.2 acres of soil will be disturbed during construction. 16,500 cubic yards of soil is to be excavated, 3,500 cubic yards will be reused on site and the remainder will be removed from the site. All disturbed areas will be replanted and revegetated to minimize future erosion potential NOTE: For silica sand projects, the EAW must include a hydrogeologic investigation assessing the potential groundwater and surface water effects and geologic conditions that could create an increased risk of potentially significant effects on groundwater and surface water. Descriptions of water resources and potential effects from the project in EAW Item 11 must be consistent with the geology, soils and topography/land forms and potential effects described in EAW Item 10. page 11 11. Water resources: a. Describe surface water and groundwater features on or near the site in a.i. and a.ii. below. i. Surface water - lakes, streams, wetlands, intermittent channels, and county/judicial ditches. Include any special designations such as public waters, trout stream/lake, wildlife lakes, migratory waterfowl feeding/resting lake, and outstanding resource value water. Include water quality impairments or special designations listed on the current MPCA 303d Impaired Waters List that are within 1 mile of the project. Include DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s), if any. Minnehaha Creek flows through Arden Park (PWI # MhC). Minnehaha Creek and downstream Lake Hiawatha appear on Minnesota’s §303(d) list of impaired waters for E. coli, chloride, and dissolved oxygen, as well as due to its impaired biological community. Downstream Lake Hiawatha is impaired due to excess nutrients. In response a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) has been developed to address these impairments. ii. Groundwater – aquifers, springs, seeps. Include: 1) depth to groundwater; 2) if project is within a MDH wellhead protection area; 3) identification of any onsite and/or nearby wells, including unique numbers and well logs if available. If there are no wells known on site or nearby, explain the methodology used to determine this. The project site does not have any known or identified springs or seeps. Depth to groundwater figure is attached. The project is located in an area primarily noted as Low Vulnerability, with the exception of the southern end of the project, which is in a Moderate Vulnerability area. The project is not within a well-head protection zone. The highest potential impact to groundwater is via the stormwater infiltration on the site. The stormwarter systems are planned for the north portion of the site, within the Low Vulnerability Zone. Due to the high water table, the majority of stormwater will be filtered and discharged to the creek, rather than infiltrating. The project is not anticipated to have any impact on groundwater resources. City wellhead area map is attached. b. Describe effects from project activities on water resources and measures to minimize or mitigate the effects in Item b.i. through Item b.iv. below. i. Wastewater - For each of the following, describe the sources, quantities and composition of all sanitary, municipal/domestic and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. Not applicable. 1) If the wastewater discharge is to a publicly owned treatment facility, identify any pretreatment measures and the ability of the facility to handle the added water and waste loadings, including any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal wastewater infrastructure. Not applicable. page 12 2) If the wastewater discharge is to a subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), describe the system used, the design flow, and suitability of site conditions for such a system. Not applicable. 3) If the wastewater discharge is to surface water, identify the wastewater treatment methods and identify discharge points and proposed effluent limitations to mitigate impacts. Discuss any effects to surface or groundwater from wastewater discharges. Not applicable. ii. Stormwater - Describe the quantity and quality of stormwater runoff at the site prior to and post construction. Include the routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site (major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters). Discuss any environmental effects from stormwater discharges. Describe stormwater pollution prevention plans including temporary and permanent runoff controls and potential BMP site locations to manage or treat stormwater runoff. Identify specific erosion control, sedimentation control or stabilization measures to address soil limitations during and after project construction. Stormwater runoff discharges through Arden Park to Minnehaha Creek through storm sewer. There is some existing in-line pretreatment, however the contributing drainage area is largely untreated. The Arden Park Restoration Project is being construction to provide regional stormwater treatment for up to 90 acres of urban stormwater runoff. Drainage patterns are shown on the attached stormwater exhibits. The project is being constructed to reduce nutrient loading to Minnehaha Creek. Stormwater quantity and quality data is summarized below. Catchment BMP Catchment Area (ac) Imp. Surface (ac) Phosphorus Load (lbs./yr.) Phosphorus Load Removed (lbs. /yr.) MC-85 Existing Infiltration Pipe 33.1 23.8 43.2 12.1 MC-85 and MC-86 Filtration Basin (underground) 84.0 40.9 64.1 9.5 Filtration Basins (above ground) 84.0 40.9 64.1 20.8 MC-87 Pre-treatment manhole structure 5.92 2.1 4.1 - 17.52 6.3 12.1 - (Underground) 5.72 2.1 3.9 2.3 Stormwater Best Management Practices BMP Water Quality Volume Provided (cf) TSS TP Influent Load (lb/yr) Total Trapped (lb/yr) Removal Efficiency Influent Load (lb/yr) Total Trapped (lb/yr) Removal Efficiency page 13 Filter Swales 82,000* 16,151 15,875 98% 88.9 43.5 49% MC-87 |BMP 600 924 221 24% 5.1 2.3 45% Underground treatment area and MC-87 BMP are designed for 1” runoff. Treatment volume provided by the swales is more than the 1” runoff volume. Removal rates are based on MIDS calculator. A P8 water quality model was created to evaluate total phosphorus (TP) removal effectiveness of two proposed best management practices (BMPs): filtration swales passing through Arden Park, and an underground filtration practice southwest of the 54th Street Bridge (assumed filtration will be required rather than infiltration due to the adjacent Creek and assumed high groundwater levels). A P8 model was initially constructed to determine the minimum swale footprint to remove 29.9 pounds of TP per year (lb-TP/yr), and the minimum underground system footprint capable of removing 3.0 lb-TP/yr. Target values were extrapolated from the 2014 Stormwater Management Plan for the 54th Street and Arden Park Area, prepared by SEH. The proposed swales and underground filtration system combine to remove approximately 16,000 pounds of total suspended solids per year and approximately 33 pounds of total phosphorus per year. The City of Edina’s XP-SWMM stormwater model was updated to reflect proposed changes in Arden Park based on the propose grading plan. The inter-swale outlets are designed such that the 100-year storm event is contained within the swales and does not overflow into the surrounding park. The proposed swales and underground filtration system combine to remove approximately 16,000 pounds of total suspended solids per year (lb-TSS/yr), and approximately 33 lb-TP/yr. The project will have a storm-water pollution prevention plan, NPDES permit, and implement erosion control measures throughout construction. Erosion control measures for this project include the following:  General silt fence installation for general construction site erosion control in accordance with MNDOT and MNDNR guidelines  Off-set channel relocation to eliminate moving water through the newly constructed channel  Dewatering using guidelines set forth in the MNDOT/MNDNR document Best Management Practices for Meeting DNR General Public Waters Work Permit GP 2004-0004 (March 2014)  Fabric encapsulation and bioengineering of streambanks and floodplain wetland construction areas  Sediment boom capture of in-stream sediment  In-situ dewatering of newly constructed channel areas including temporary infiltration basins  Planting of native species including wetland mixes, wetland plants, eastern cottonwood and black willow  Temporary wetland haul road construction  Temporary stabilization of soil stockpiles Overall, the project will improve watershed quality by providing new, regional stormwater treatment of runoff which discharges largely untreated to Minnehaha Creek today. page 14 iii. Water appropriation - Describe if the project proposes to appropriate surface or groundwater (including dewatering). Describe the source, quantity, duration, use and purpose of the water use and if a DNR water appropriation permit is required. Describe any well abandonment. If connecting to an existing municipal water supply, identify the wells to be used as a water source and any effects on, or required expansion of, municipal water infrastructure. Discuss environmental effects from water appropriation, including an assessment of the water resources available for appropriation. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects from the water appropriation. Based on two similar projects completed previously upstream on Minnehaha Creek, the project does not anticipated a need for significant dewatering during construction. The closure of Gray’s Bay dam, low probability of significant precipitation during construction, and the anticipated winter construction all result in very little flow into the project site. Further, the potential for dewatering is limited by off- channel construction, which avoids the need to manage active flow in many areas of the project. In areas within existing channel, bulk bag diversions will be implemented. iv. Surface Waters a) Wetlands - Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to wetland features such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging and vegetative removal. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of wetlands, including the anticipated effects that any proposed wetland alterations may have to the host watershed. Identify measures to avoid (e.g., available alternatives that were considered), minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to wetlands. Discuss whether any required compensatory wetland mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts will occur in the same minor or major watershed, and identify those probable locations. As noted above, wetlands on the project site will increase from 6.5 acres to 7.2 acres. The project involves conversion of an open water pond to a functioning lotic system, and the result is an increase in vegetated wetlands within the restored riparian area. Given the nature of the project, impact to the stream and adjacent wetlands is unavoidable. The project will include specific access areas for work, but will temporarily impact existing wetland areas. Overall, the increased wetland area and the conversion of the reach from a lentic to lotic system will improve overall ecological health within Minnehaha Creek. Invasive reed canary grass (Phalaris arudinacea) will be removed with sediment excavation in bordering areas, and native vegetation will be planted on all newly constructed streambanks and disturbed floodplain areas, resulting in a functional improvement to the wetland complex. The project has been designed to minimize impacts to existing canopy trees within the immediate riparian zone. Additional native trees and shrubs are also being planted. Fish passage will also be included at the 54th Street Bridge, via a saw cut and naturalization of the existing concrete slab that underlies the bridge. This will provide improved fisheries and macrobiotic connectivity between the stream upstream and downstream of the project reach. b) Other surface waters- Describe any anticipated physical effects or alterations to surface water features (lakes, streams, ponds, intermittent channels, county/judicial ditches) such as draining, filling, permanent inundation, dredging, diking, stream diversion, impoundment, aquatic plant removal and riparian alteration. Discuss direct and indirect environmental effects from physical modification of water page 15 features. Identify measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate environmental effects to surface water features, including in-water Best Management Practices that are proposed to avoid or minimize turbidity/sedimentation while physically altering the water features. Discuss how the project will change the number or type of watercraft on any water body, including current and projected watercraft usage. The project includes the re-meander of a straightened and impounded segment of Minnehaha Creek. The reach will increase in length approximately 150 linear feet, from 1780 ft. to 1925ft. The designed meander pattern is based on previously completed geomorphic assessment data from 2003 and 2012, historic meander patterns identified in aerial imagery, hydraulic modeling and field depth-to-refusal (historic channel bed) investigation. The dam removal and meander restoration is anticipated to increase the number of recreational boaters and anglers utilizing the creek within the park. 12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes: a. Pre-project site conditions - Describe existing contamination or potential environmental hazards on or in close proximity to the project site such as soil or ground water contamination, abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Discuss any potential environmental effects from pre-project site conditions that would be caused or exacerbated by project construction and operation. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from existing contamination or potential environmental hazards. Include development of a Contingency Plan or Response Action Plan. No abandoned dumps, closed landfills, existing or abandoned storage tanks, and hazardous liquid or gas pipelines are located within the project site. Elevated levels of arsenic and PAH’s were detected during sediment sampling within the impounded sediment within the project area. These elevated levels are believed to be naturally occurring, but merit special disposal in certain areas. Contaminated sediments will be disposed of based on MPCA guidelines. b. Project related generation/storage of solid wastes - Describe solid wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from solid waste handling, storage and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of solid waste including source reduction and recycling. There are no known sources of solid waste in the project area. Any solid waste for project materials such as erosion control materials or plant packaging will be disposed of through existing trash hauling companies as a responsibility of the contractor. c. Project related use/storage of hazardous materials - Describe chemicals/hazardous materials used/stored during construction and/or operation of the project including method of storage. Indicate the number, location and size of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum or other materials. Discuss potential environmental effects from accidental spill or release of hazardous materials. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the use/storage of chemicals/hazardous materials including source reduction and recycling. Include development of a spill prevention plan. Equipment using petroleum fuels, oils, and lubricants and other hazardous materials will be used during project construction and is the most likely source of hazardous or toxic materials to impact the project. page 16 No storage of any chemicals or hazardous materials would occur onsite. Equipment will be inspected daily for leaks and petroleum contamination and refueling will occur away from surface waters. Accidental releases of these materials could occur. A spill could result in surface contamination of soils and groundwater. The contractor would be required to prepare a Spill Prevention and Response Plan that would address measures to avoid and minimize spills or releases of hazardous materials or petroleum products during construction. Spills would be reported to the MPCA Duty Officer. d. Project related generation/storage of hazardous wastes - Describe hazardous wastes generated/stored during construction and/or operation of the project. Indicate method of disposal. Discuss potential environmental effects from hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. Identify measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects from the generation/storage of hazardous waste including source reduction and recycling. Generation or storage of hazardous wastes are not anticipated as part of this project. 13. Fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources (rare features): a. Describe fish and wildlife resources as well as habitats and vegetation on or in near the site. There are no state endangered or threatened species or rare plant communities or rare ecological resources known on the site. b. Describe rare features such as state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, native plant communities, Minnesota County Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance, and other sensitive ecological resources on or within close proximity to the site. Provide the license agreement number (LA-____) and/or correspondence number (ERDB _____________) from which the data were obtained and attach the Natural Heritage letter from the DNR. Indicate if any additional habitat or species survey work has been conducted within the site and describe the results. c. Discuss how the identified fish, wildlife, plant communities, rare features and ecosystems may be affected by the project. Include a discussion on introduction and spread of invasive species from the project construction and operation. Separately discuss effects to known threatened and endangered species. The project will result in lower stream temperatures, improved riverine (lotic) habitat and improved riparian canopy cover. Lower stream temperatures benefit fish, mussels and macroinvertebrates, while improved habitat in the form of riffles, pools, bank cover and riparian vegetation improves conditions for aquatic and terrestrial invertebrates, fish, amphibians, reptiles and mammals. Improved riparian corridor vegetation creates additional habitat for migrating and residential bird species. Invasive reed canary grass (Phalaris arudinacea), buckthorn (Rhamnus sp.) and any other invasive plants within the excavation areas will be removed, and native vegetation will be planted on all newly constructed streambanks and disturbed floodplain areas. The project has been designed to minimize impacts to existing canopy trees within the immediate riparian zone. Additional native trees and shrubs are also being planted. d. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to fish, wildlife, plant communities, and sensitive ecological resources. page 17 Minnehaha Creek contains warm water and pollution tolerant fish community originating primarily from out migrants from Lake Minnetonka. Minnehaha Creek is prone to freezing solid in cold winters (e.g. 2010), drying up completely in dry summers (2012), and flooding in wet periods (2014, 2015), the impact of restoration activities is comparatively minimal and of short duration. The project will not adversely affect fish or wildlife populations, but will in fact improve instream, riparian, wetland and upland habitat conditions for fish and wildlife. During construction, fish will be rescued from any dewatered segments of the channel or wetland areas to be graded, and will be relocated upstream of the project area. Dewatering activities will include diversion and in-situ dewatering to minimize downstream transport of fine sediment. 14. Historic properties: Describe any historic structures, archeological sites, and/or traditional cultural properties on or in close proximity to the site. Include: 1) historic designations, 2) known artifact areas, and 3) architectural features. Attach letter received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Discuss any anticipated effects to historic properties during project construction and operation. Identify measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects to historic properties. An Archaeology and Architectural History Literature Review and Archaeological Assessment for the project was conducted and has been submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for coordination with the State Historic Preservation Office. The report finds that no previously recorded archaeological sites are located within the project area and no listed architectural history properties are located on the site. 15. Visual: Describe any scenic views or vistas on or near the project site. Describe any project related visual effects such as vapor plumes or glare from intense lights. Discuss the potential visual effects from the project. Identify any measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate visual effects. The project site is located in a residential neighborhood with open views in the northeast portion of the park and minimal views of Minnehaha Creek except at crossings. The western portion of the site is relatively higher in elevation but dense with buckthorn which obstructs views through the woodland area. There will be temporary visual impact from active construction which will include excavation and dirt moving activities, tree removals, and trail and shelter building construction activities during the construction period of January – September 2019. 16. Air: a. Stationary source emissions - Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources such as boilers or exhaust stacks. Include any hazardous air pollutants, criteria pollutants, and any greenhouse gases. Discuss effects to air quality including any sensitive receptors, human health or applicable regulatory criteria. Include a discussion of any methods used assess the project’s effect on air quality and the results of that assessment. Identify pollution control equipment and other measures that will be taken to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse effects from stationary source emissions. Not applicable. page 18 b. Vehicle emissions - Describe the effect of the project’s traffic generation on air emissions. Discuss the project’s vehicle-related emissions effect on air quality. Identify measures (e.g. traffic operational improvements, diesel idling minimization plan) that will be taken to minimize or mitigate vehicle-related emissions. Not applicable. Temporary hauling of excess earthwork from the project site is anticipated, but there are no long term impacts to vehicle emissions associated with the project. c. Dust and odors - Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of dust and odors generated during project construction and operation. (Fugitive dust may be discussed under item 16a). Discuss the effect of dust and odors in the vicinity of the project including nearby sensitive receptors and quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of dust and odors. Because of the wetland soil conditions, it is unlikely that significant dust will be generated. Odors from digging saturated soils and construction equipment exhaust are likely. 17. Noise Describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities, and intensity of noise generated during project construction and operation. Discuss the effect of noise in the vicinity of the project including 1) existing noise levels/sources in the area, 2) nearby sensitive receptors, 3) conformance to state noise standards, and 4) quality of life. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate the effects of noise. Noise will be generated by equipment and machinery during construction. Equipment is anticipated to include two small to medium sized excavators, two track mounted skid loaders, trucks, small bulldozers, manual vibratory soil compactors, compressors, and de-watering pumps. Although these machines generate noise, it is unlikely that more than three machines will be running at any given time, and there is a considerable buffer (150 ft. +) between the park construction area and the majority of adjacent homes. Operation of construction equipment will meet City of St. Louis Park noise ordinance requirements and occur during allowable working hours set by the City of Edina. 18. Transportation a. Describe traffic-related aspects of project construction and operation. Include: 1) existing and proposed additional parking spaces, 2) estimated total average daily traffic generated, 3) estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of occurrence, 4) indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates, and 5) availability of transit and/or other alternative transportation modes. On-street parking exists today. No new parking is proposed as part of the project. b. Discuss the effect on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project’s impact on the regional transportation system. If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2,500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of the EAW. Use the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Access Management Manual, Chapter 5 (available at: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/accessmanagement/resources.html) or a similar local guidance, page 19 Not Applicable. c. Identify measures that will be taken to minimize or mitigate project related transportation effects. Not Applicable. 19. Cumulative potential effects: (Preparers can leave this item blank if cumulative potential effects are addressed under the applicable EAW Items) a. Describe the geographic scales and timeframes of the project related environmental effects that could combine with other environmental effects resulting in cumulative potential effects. b. Describe any reasonably foreseeable future projects (for which a basis of expectation has been laid) that may interact with environmental effects of the proposed project within the geographic scales and timeframes identified above. c. Discuss the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects. The project has the potential to further remediation efforts in Minnehaha Creek and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The cumulative effect of these efforts would result in only positive impacts, including the greater health and restoration of the watershed and contributing toward the Minnehaha Creek/Hiawatha Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) goals. 20. Other potential environmental effects: If the project may cause any additional environmental effects not addressed by items 1 to 19, describe the effects here, discuss the how the environment will be affected, and identify measures that will be taken to minimize and mitigate these effects. RGU CERTIFICATION. (The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.) I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9c and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature ________________________________ Date _______________________________ Title ________________________________ © 2018 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2018) Distribution Airbus DS © 2018 Microsoft Corporation © 2018 HERE 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 1 SHEET INDEX 1 - TITLE SHEET & SHEET INDEX 2 - NOTES & LEGEND 3 - SITE PLAN 4 - REMOVAL 5 - EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 6 - PLAN & PROFILE 1 OF 3 7 - CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTIONS 1 OF 3 8 - PLAN & PROFILE 2 OF 3 9 - CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTIONS 2 OF 3 10 - PLAN & PROFILE 3 OF 3 11 - CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTIONS 3 OF 3 12 - TYPICAL SECTIONS 13 - TYPICAL SECTIONS 14 - TYPICAL DETAILS POOL CONSTRUCTION & LOG CONNECTIONS 15 - TYPICAL DETAILS FES LIFTS 16 - TYPICAL DETAILS FES LIFTS C-501 - OVERALL STORM SEWER AND BMP PLAN C-502 - STORM SEWER AND BMP PLAN NORTH C-503 - STORM SEWER AND BMP PLAN SOUTH C-801 - DETAILS VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SITE MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' TITLE SHEET & SHEET INDEX MINNEAPOLIS & ST. PAUL ROCHESTER DULUTH GRAND RAPIDS BEMIDJI FARGO STATE MAP - MINNESOTA NOT TO SCALE ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA 60% DESIGN, May 9, 2018 PROJECT LOCATION MINNEHAHA CREEK W 54TH ST W 52ND ST WO O D L A N D A V E FR A N C E A V E S ARDEN PARK 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 2NOTES & LEGEND PLAN LEGEND EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING 1 FT CONTOUR NEW 1 FT CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STAGING AREA TEMPORARY STOCKPILE - TBD STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SILT FENCE - TBD RIFFLE POOL FABRIC ENCAPSULATED SOIL (FES) LIFT STONE TOE STONE TOE (4 FT) GRADING EXTENTS NATIVE SEEDING TREE TO BE REMOVED 601 CP SPK 602 CP SPK 603 CP SPK 604 CP SPK 605 CP SPK 606 CP SPK 607 CP 608 CP 610 CP 611 CP SPK 612 CP SPK 613 CP SPK 614 CP SPK 615 CP 616 CP SPK 617 CP SPK 0+ 0 0 1+00 2+0 0 3+ 0 0 4+00 5+00 6+ 0 0 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+00 10+0 0 11+0 0 12+0 0 13+ 0 0 14+ 0 0 15+0 0 16+00 17+00 18+0 0 19+0 0 20+00 21+0 0 22+00 23 + 0 0 2 4 + 0 0 0+961+00 2+0 0 3+ 0 0 4+0 0 5+00 6+0 0 7+00 8 + 0 0 9 + 0 0 10 + 0 0 11+00 12+00 13+ 0 0 1 4 + 0 0 15+ 0 0 16+00 17+ 0 0 18 + 0 0 19+00 20+00 21+00 21+ 7 0 CONTROL POINT TABLE Point # 616 608 615 607 606 603 614 610 613 601 605 604 612 600 602 611 Raw Description CP SPK CP CP CP CP SPK CP SPK CP SPK CP CP SPK CP SPK CP SPK CP SPK CP SPK CP SPK CP SPK CP SPK Elevation 869.07 882.82 872.65 880.92 864.39 884.27 872.24 872.44 871.77 891.65 891.67 877.32 865.62 896.47 885.31 867.73 Northing 141687.78 141663.05 141903.72 141972.81 142140.96 142201.66 142162.99 142161.95 142249.67 142442.72 142458.16 142515.55 142615.73 142768.46 142864.06 142989.50 Easting 512842.55 512455.73 512775.01 512412.79 512566.21 512476.42 512922.70 512959.59 512993.25 512364.58 512377.96 512453.82 512876.76 512089.56 512232.23 512574.02 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT SCALE IN FEET 0 240120 PLAN LEGEND EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING 1 FT CONTOUR NEW 1 FT CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STAGING AREA TEMPORARY STOCKPILE - TBD 3SITE PLAN SH E E T 6 SHEET 8 SHEET 10 W 5 4 T H S T BROOKVIEW AVE W 5 3 R D S T MINNEHAHA BLVD W 5 2 N D S T ARDEN AVE FLOW FLOW FLOW NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT SUGGESTED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING TBD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES SURFACE NEW STA.CUT (Cu Yd)FILL (Cu Yd) RE-MEANDER REACH INCLUDING FLOODPLAIN 0+95 - 21+70 14,095 2,263 LANDSCAPE RIVER RIGHT GRADING LANDSCAPE RIVER LEFT GRADING DO NOT DISTURB DO NOT DISTURB DO NOT DISTURB DO NOT DISTURB STAGING AREA 600 CP SPK 601 CP SPK 602 CP SPK 603 CP SPK 604 CP SPK 605 CP SPK 606 CP SPK 607 CP 608 CP 610 CP 611 CP SPK 612 CP SPK 613 CP SPK 614 CP SPK 615 CP 616 CP SPK CP SPK 0+961+00 2+0 0 3+ 0 0 4+0 0 5+00 6+0 0 7+00 8 + 0 0 9 + 0 0 10 + 0 0 11+00 12+00 13+ 0 0 1 4 + 0 0 15+ 0 0 16+00 17+ 0 0 18 + 0 0 19+00 20+00 21+00 21+ 7 0 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT SCALE IN FEET 0 200100 PLAN LEGEND EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING 1 FT CONTOUR NEW 1 FT CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED TREE TO BE REMOVED 4REMOVAL W 5 4 T H S T BROOKVIEW AVE W 5 3 R D S T MINNEHAHA BLVD W 5 2 N D S T ARDEN AVE FLOW FLOW FLOW EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE DO NOT DISTURB DO NOT DISTURB DO NOT DISTURB EXISTING DAM TO BE REMOVED EXISTING PARK SHELTER TO BE REMOVED EXISTING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING PLAYGROUND TO BE REMOVED NOTE: ADDITIONAL TREES MAY HAVE TO BE REMOVED BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS AND/OR AT THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF EDINA 600 CP SPK 601 CP SPK 602 CP SPK 603 CP SPK 604 CP SPK 605 CP SPK 606 CP SPK 607 CP 608 CP 610 CP 611 CP SPK 612 CP SPK 613 CP SPK 614 CP SPK 615 CP 616 CP SPK 617 CP SPK 0+ 0 0 1+00 2+0 0 3+ 0 0 4+00 5+00 6+ 0 0 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+00 10+0 0 11+0 0 12+0 0 13+ 0 0 14+ 0 0 15+0 0 16+00 17+00 18+0 0 19+0 0 20+00 21+0 0 22+00 23 + 0 0 2 4 + 0 0 25+00 2 6 + 0 0 26 + 4 5 0+961+00 2+0 0 3+ 0 0 4+0 0 5+00 6+0 0 7+00 8 + 0 0 9 + 0 0 10 + 0 0 11+00 12+00 13+ 0 0 1 4 + 0 0 15+ 0 0 16+00 17+ 0 0 18 + 0 0 19+00 20+00 21+00 21+ 7 0 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT SCALE IN FEET 0 240120 5 EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLAN LEGEND EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING 1 FT CONTOUR NEW 1 FT CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STAGING AREA TEMPORARY STOCKPILE - TBD STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NATIVE SEEDING SILT FENCE - TBD W 5 4 T H S T BROOKVIEW AVE OAKLAWN AVE W 5 3 R D S T MINNEHAHA BLVD W 5 2 N D S T ARDEN AVE FLOW FLOW FLOW NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DO NOT DISTURB DO NOT DISTURB STAGING AREA DO NOT DISTURB DO NOT DISTURB NATIVE SEEDING 607 CP 615 CP 616 CP SPK 617 CP SPK 1+ 0 0 2+00 3+0 0 4+0 0 5 + 0 0 6 + 0 0 7 + 0 0 0+ 9 6 1+ 0 0 2+00 3+0 0 4+00 5+ 0 0 6 + 0 0 7 + 0 0 4 7 5 7 6 7 3 7 86 4 8 6 2 8 6 1 8 6 2 86 3 87 0 8 7 4 8 6 1 862 86 1 8 6 2 862 8 6 3 8 6 4 8 6 3 860 858 861 8 5 9 8 6 0 857 1 7 2 7 7 9 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+961+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 7+50 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT SCALE IN FEET 0 8040 PLAN LEGEND EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING 1 FT CONTOUR NEW 1 FT CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TEMPORARY STOCKPILE - TBD RIFFLE POOL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE STONE TOE STONE TOE (4FT) GRADING EXTENTS FES LIFTS 6PLAN & PROFILE 1 OF 3 S C A L E I N F E E T 10 60 NEW GRADE PROFILE AVERAGE SLOPE 0.30% EXISTING GRADE NEW GRADE NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT FL O W FL O W FLO W W 5 4 T H S T MINNEHAHA BLVD GRADING EXTENTS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE RIFFLE, TYP.2 12 POOL, TYP.1 12 TIE IN FOR FLANK PROTECTION STONE TOE KAYAK LAUNCH DETAILS - SEE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DRAWINGS STONE TOE (4 FT ABOVE AVERAGE BED ELEVATION) STONE TOE (3 FT ABOVE AVERAGE BED ELEVATION) FES LIFT, TYP.1 16 DO NOT DISTURB 54TH ST GRADING AND DETAIL TO BE PROVIDED AT 90% SUBMITTAL 850 860 870 880 850 860 870 880 0+00 1+00 1+11 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 0+85 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 0+99 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 0+77 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+27 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+83 1 6 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 2+28 2 6 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 2+92 3 6 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 3+78 4 6 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 4+65 5 6 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 5+93 6 6 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 7+22 ST A : 0 + 1 4 . 8 9 EL E V : 8 6 5 . 0 0 ST A : 0 + 3 1 . 6 9 EL E V : 8 5 5 . 8 2 STA:0+64.13 ELEV:855.83 STA:0+72.00 ELEV:863.77 STA:0+70.65 ELEV:860.00 ST A : 0 + 0 6 . 9 6 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 6 0 ST A : 0 + 2 3 . 7 1 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 0 0 ST A : 0 + 3 1 . 8 3 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 0 0 ST A : 0 + 3 9 . 5 1 EL E V : 8 5 6 . 0 2 ST A : 0 + 7 1 . 5 5 EL E V : 8 5 6 . 0 2 ST A : 0 + 7 9 . 2 0 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 9 0 STA:0+76.56 ELEV:858.54 ST A : 0 + 0 3 . 1 6 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 0 2 ST A : 0 + 1 6 . 8 2 EL E V : 8 5 8 . 7 6 ST A : 0 + 2 1 . 8 8 EL E V : 8 5 6 . 2 6 ST A : 0 + 5 4 . 2 5 EL E V : 8 5 6 . 2 7 ST A : 0 + 5 9 . 2 9 EL E V : 8 5 8 . 7 7 ST A : 0 + 6 6 . 6 3 EL E V : 8 5 8 . 7 8 ST A : 0 + 2 9 . 8 3 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 9 2 ST A : 0 + 4 3 . 0 8 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 0 2 ST A : 0 + 4 8 . 0 9 EL E V : 8 5 6 . 5 2 ST A : 0 + 8 0 . 2 0 EL E V : 8 5 6 . 5 3 ST A : 0 + 8 5 . 2 1 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 0 3 ST A : 0 + 9 3 . 4 1 EL E V : 8 6 7 . 6 2 ST A : 0 + 2 3 . 8 2 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 1 0 ST A : 0 + 4 4 . 4 0 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 4 1 ST A : 0 + 4 9 . 4 0 EL E V : 8 5 6 . 9 1 ST A : 0 + 8 1 . 4 0 EL E V : 8 5 6 . 9 1 ST A : 0 + 8 6 . 4 0 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 4 1 ST A : 1 + 0 6 . 4 2 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 4 1 ST A : 1 + 1 3 . 9 0 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 1 6 ST A : 0 + 0 9 . 4 0 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 2 2 ST A : 1 + 2 0 . 6 9 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 7 9 ST A : 1 + 2 5 . 6 9 EL E V : 8 5 7 . 2 9 ST A : 1 + 5 7 . 7 3 EL E V : 8 5 7 . 3 0 ST A : 1 + 6 9 . 9 6 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 4 1 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 7 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTIONS 1 OF 3 S C A L E I N F E E T 10 20 LEGEND EXISTING GRADE NEW GRADE 606 CP SPK 7+ 0 0 8+ 0 0 9+00 10+0 0 11+0 0 12+0 0 13+ 0 0 8 + 0 0 9 + 0 0 10 + 0 0 11+00 12+00 13+ 0 0 1 4 + 0 0 15+ 0 0 8 9 9 9 11 11 8 6 2 8 6 1 862 862 864 86 6 86 4 862 863 865 874 864 863 8 6 6 865 8 6 6 861 866 861 864 860 860 8 6 1 858 860 862 865 864 866 862 865 8 5 9 7 9 10 9 850 860 870 850 860 870 7+50 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT SCALE IN FEET 0 8040 8PLAN & PROFILE 2 OF 3 S C A L E I N F E E T 10 60 NEW GRADE PROFILE EXISTING GRADE NEW GRADE NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT F L O W FL O W FLOW MI N N E H A H A B L V D AVERAGE SLOPE 0.30% GRADING EXTENTS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING 1 FT CONTOUR NEW 1 FT CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STAGING AREA TEMPORARY STOCKPILE - TBD RIFFLE POOL STONE TOE GRADING EXTENTS FES LIFTS RIFFLE, TYP.2 12 POOL, TYP.1 12 STONE TOE (3 FT ABOVE AVERAGE BED ELEVATION) KAYAK LAUNCH DETAILS - SEE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DRAWINGS FES LIFT, TYP.1 16 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+82 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+53 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+81 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+27 7 8 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 8+61 8 8 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 10+20 9 8 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 12+50 10 8 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 14+50 ST A : 0 + 1 2 . 5 1 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 8 6 ST A : 1 + 1 2 . 5 6 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 2 1 ST A : 1 + 1 7 . 5 6 EL E V : 8 5 7 . 7 1 ST A : 1 + 4 9 . 5 6 EL E V : 8 5 7 . 7 1 ST A : 1 + 5 4 . 5 7 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 2 1 ST A : 1 + 7 0 . 6 2 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 6 8 ST A : 0 + 1 7 . 2 5 EL E V : 8 6 1 . 2 3 ST A : 0 + 2 3 . 3 2 EL E V : 8 5 8 . 1 8 ST A : 0 + 5 5 . 3 2 EL E V : 8 5 8 . 1 8 ST A : 0 + 6 0 . 3 2 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 6 8 ST A : 1 + 4 9 . 9 7 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 0 7 ST A : 0 + 0 1 . 1 2 EL E V : 8 6 5 . 7 0 ST A : 0 + 1 4 . 8 0 EL E V : 8 5 8 . 8 7 ST A : 0 + 4 6 . 8 5 EL E V : 8 5 8 . 8 6 ST A : 0 + 5 1 . 8 6 EL E V : 8 6 1 . 3 6 ST A : 1 + 7 7 . 0 2 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 0 0 ST A : 0 + 2 1 . 8 5 EL E V : 8 6 6 . 0 0 ST A : 0 + 3 7 . 4 1 EL E V : 8 6 4 . 0 0 ST A : 0 + 4 6 . 6 1 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 4 7 ST A : 0 + 7 8 . 6 0 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 4 6 ST A : 0 + 9 2 . 1 3 EL E V : 8 6 6 . 0 0 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 9 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTIONS 2 OF 3 S C A L E I N F E E T 10 20 LEGEND EXISTING GRADE NEW GRADE 604 CP SPK 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 15+0 0 16+00 17+00 18+ 0 0 19+00 20+ 0 0 21+00 21+70 12 11 14 11 13 11 11 11 865 8 6 8 86 7 8 6 6 865 864 861 86 2 864 863 864 8 6 6 866 8 6 4 8 6 4 865 86 0 864 86 3 868 865 86 7 86 6 864 861 863 863 865 863 10 9 15 11 850 860 870 850 860 870 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 22+50 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT SCALE IN FEET 0 8040 10PLAN & PROFILE 3 OF 3 S C A L E I N F E E T 10 60 NEW GRADE PROFILE EXISTING GRADE NEW GRADE NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT FLOW FLOW FLOW AVERAGE SLOPE 0.30% GRADING EXTENTS LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING CHANNEL ALIGNMENT NEW CHANNEL ALIGNMENT EXISTING 1 FT CONTOUR NEW 1 FT CONTOUR PROPERTY BOUNDARIES LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE STAGING AREA TEMPORARY STOCKPILE - TBD RIFFLE POOL STONE TOE GRADING EXTENTS FES LIFTS RIFFLE, TYP.2 12 POOL, TYP.1 12 STONE TOE (3 FT ABOVE AVERAGE BED ELEVATION) STONE TOE (3 FT ABOVE AVERAGE BED ELEVATION) FOR BRIDGE DETAIL AND ABUTMENT DETAILS, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR PARK AND STORMWATER AMENITIES, SEE LA AND CIVIL DRAWINGS FES LIFT, TYP.1 16 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 0+93 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+39 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+36 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+34 850 860 870 850 860 870 0+00 1+00 1+49 11 10 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 15+65 12 10 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 16+89 13 10 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 17+86 14 10 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 18+93 15 10 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTION STA: 20+75 ST A : 0 + 0 0 . 1 8 EL E V : 8 6 4 . 0 0 ST A : 0 + 3 3 . 3 6 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 0 0 ST A : 0 + 3 9 . 9 7 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 8 1 ST A : 0 + 7 1 . 9 8 EL E V : 8 5 9 . 8 1 ST A : 0 + 7 6 . 9 8 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 3 1 ST A : 0 + 7 9 . 7 5 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 3 1 ST A : 0 + 1 2 . 0 9 EL E V : 8 6 4 . 6 7 ST A : 0 + 2 1 . 1 0 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 1 8 ST A : 0 + 5 3 . 1 2 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 1 8 ST A : 0 + 5 8 . 1 2 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 6 8 ST A : 1 + 3 0 . 0 9 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 8 9 ST A : 0 + 1 8 . 1 6 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 9 6 ST A : 0 + 6 4 . 0 9 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 9 7 ST A : 0 + 6 9 . 1 0 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 4 7 ST A : 1 + 0 1 . 1 2 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 4 7 ST A : 1 + 0 6 . 1 2 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 9 7 ST A : 1 + 1 5 . 8 2 EL E V : 8 6 2 . 9 7 ST A : 0 + 0 9 . 9 7 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 3 9 ST A : 0 + 7 8 . 8 1 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 3 0 ST A : 0 + 8 3 . 9 5 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 8 0 ST A : 1 + 1 6 . 3 5 EL E V : 8 6 0 . 7 8 ST A : 1 + 2 5 . 0 0 EL E V : 8 6 5 . 0 4 ST A : 0 + 4 1 . 6 3 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 8 3 ST A : 0 + 6 7 . 2 7 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 8 3 ST A : 0 + 7 2 . 2 7 EL E V : 8 6 1 . 3 3 ST A : 1 + 0 4 . 2 8 EL E V : 8 6 1 . 3 3 ST A : 1 + 0 9 . 4 5 EL E V : 8 6 3 . 9 1 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 11 CONSTRUCTION CROSS SECTIONS 3 OF 3 S C A L E I N F E E T 10 20 LEGEND EXISTING GRADE NEW GRADE POOL LOW FLOW 0. 5 F T 15 1 LOW FLOW 1 2 2 1 5 1 42' +/-, TOTAL WIDTH VARIES 32' +/-, TOTAL WIDTH VARIES MA X P O O L D E P T H 2 ' 17 1 2 1 1' +/- 10 - 20 FT VARIABLE STREAMBED EXISTING GROUND LARGE WOOD PLACEMENT CABLE LOGS AT CONTACT POINTSNATIVE GROUND MATERIAL KEY TRENCH NEW GRADE EXISTING GROUND KEY TRENCH ANCHOR FABRIC BENEATH GRAVEL WHERE TREATMENTS COINCIDE WITH KEY TRENCH (ALTERNATE TOE TREATMENT) 1' FABRIC EMBEDMENT WOODEN STAKE 2 FES LIFTS TYP. MINIMUM OF 1 FES LIFT ABOVE LOG NATURAL LEVEE FEATURE SELECT LOCATIONS GRAVEL SPAWNING PAD: STREAMBED GRAVEL, 1' THICK NOT AT ALL LOCATIONS, SEE PLAN AND PROFILE SHEETS TYPICAL SECTION POOL NOT TO SCALE 1 TYP TYPICAL SECTION RIFFLE NOT TO SCALE 2 TYP FES LIFT (NUMBER OF LIFTS VARIES, NOT AT ALL LOCATIONS) SAND AND GRAVEL POINT BAR FEATURE ENCAPSULATED GRAVEL TOE 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 12TYPICAL SECTIONS TYPICAL SECTION RIFFLE WITH 3 FT & 4 FT STONE TOE STA: ~ 1+75 - 4+00 NOT TO SCALE 1 TYP EXISTING GROUND KEY TRENCH NEW GRADE 4 F T 3 F T 1 F T TIE SURFACE FABRIC INTO EXISTING SLOPE RIFFLE MATERIAL 4 FT STONE TOE 3 FT STONE TOE FES LIFTSSURFACE FABRIC 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 13TYPICAL SECTIONS BOLTED CONNECTION NOTES PIN LOGS TO LOGS 1.DRILL 7/8" DIA HOLE THROUGH LOGS. 2.INSERT 7/8" DIA THREADED ROD. 3.INSTALL STEEL PLATES AND HEAVY HEX NUTS. SECURE NUTS BY CHISELING THREADS OR MUSHROOMING EXPOSED ENDS OF ROD. 4.FILE OR GRIND OFF SHARP EDGES SQUARE WASHER AND HEAVY HEX NUT PRE-DRILL 7/8 IN. DIA. HOLE, 7/8 IN. DIA. THREADED ROD TYPICAL DETAIL LOG-LOG CONNECTIONS NOT TO SCALE 2 TYP EMBEDMENT DEPTH 10 FT (MIN.) EQUAL TO EMBEDMENT DEPTH TYPICAL SECTION LOG PULL OUT TEST NOT TO SCALE 1 TYP EXCAVATOR BUCKET SHORT CABLE RATED FOR WORKING LOAD EXCEEDING 12 TONS TENSION METER SHACKLE RATED FOR 12 TON (MIN.) WORKING LOAD CHOKER RATED FOR 12 TON (MIN.) WORKING LOAD EXCAVATOR TRACKS LOG PILE RIGGING RIGGING FOR PILE TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE TENSION SCALE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. CHOKERS, CABLES AND AND SHACKLES SHALL HAVE MINIMUM WORKING LOAD RATING OF 12 TONS. FITTINGS SHALL BE SIZED ACCORDINGLY. TESTING TESTING OF PILES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE ENGINEER. UP TO FOUR LOAD TESTS SHALL BE APPLIED TO EACH TESTED PILE. EACH OF THE FOUR LOAD TESTS SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE PILE WITH A DIFFERENT INSTALLED DEPTH. EACH PILE TEST SHALL HAVE UPWARD LOAD GRADUALLY INCREASED AND AS CLOSELY ALIGNED TO AXIS OF PILE AS POSSIBLE. RECORD THE PILE DIAMETER, EMBEDMENT DEPTH AND MAXIMUM FORCE REQUIRED TO MOVE THE PILE VERTICALLY APPROXIMATELY 1 INCH. THEN DRIVE THE PILE TO A NEW DEPTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S ENGINEER IN CONSULTATION WITH THE ENGINEER. APPLY NEW LOAD AND RECORD MAX FORCE THAT CAUSES THE PILE TO MOVE VERTICALLY 1 INCH. REPEAT FOR THIRD AND FOURTH TEST. PROOF LOAD TESTS MAY BE REQUIRED AT UP TO THREE DEPTHS FOR EACH PILE PENDING RESULTS AND APPROVAL BY ENGINEER. DEPTHS SHALL BE DETERMINED IN THE FIELD. AS A GUIDELINE, TEST EMBEDMENT DEPTHS MAY INCLUDE 8 FT, 10 FT, 12 FT, AND 14 FT. TESTS AT 12 FT AND 14 FT WILL ONLY BE REQUIRED IF PILES MUST BE DRIVEN DEEPER THAN 10 FT TO ACHIEVE TARGET PULLOUT RESISTANCE. SEE NOTE BELOW. EXCAVATOR CONDUCTING PULL OUT LOADING SHALL BE POSITIONED NO CLOSER THAN EMBEDMENT DEPTH OF PILE, IF POSSIBLE. IF A CLOSER POSITIONING IS REQUIRED, EXCAVATOR SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN THAT REQUIRED TO GENERATE DESIRED LOADING WITH DISTANCE FROM PILE NOTED IN THE TEST RECORD. LIMIT COMPRESSIVE LOADING OF THE TRACKS ON THE GROUND BY DRIVING THE EXCAVATOR ONTO LOGS LAID ON THE GROUND TO DISTRIBUTE THE WEIGHT OVER A LARGER AREA. PULL OUT RESISTANCE READING SHALL BE COMPARED AGAINST EXCAVATOR MAX LIFT OFFSET TABLE. UP TO 10% OF PRODUCTION PILINGS SHALL BE PROOF TESTED. IF RESULTS VARY MORE THAN 50% THEN IT SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED THAT UP TO 25% OF THE PRODUCTION PILINGS SHALL BE PROOF TESTED. PILE EMBEDMENT DEPTH SPECIFIED IN THESE DRAWINGS MAY BE INCREASED, AT NO ADDITIONAL COST, PENDING COMPARISON OF PULL OUT TEST RESULTS TO AN ASSUMED RAW PULLOUT RESISTANCE OF 15,000 POUNDS. IF TESTING REVEALS FIELD PULLOUT RESISTANCE VALUES THAT ARE LESS THAN THE ASSUMED VALUES, PILES MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE DRIVEN UP TO 5 FT DEEPER THAN INDICATED. ENGINEER WILL DETERMINE WHETHER THE NUMBER OF PILES MAY BE REDUCED IF TESTING YIELDS VALUES THAT EXCEED ASSUMED VALUES, BASED ON EVALUATION OF VERTICAL PULLOUT AND LATERAL BRACING OBJECTIVES AT EACH LOCATION. LOG LOG LO G LOG 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 14 TYPICAL DETAILS POOL CONSTRUCTION & LOG CONNECTIONS LEG WIDTH 0.6" TAPERED TO POINT STAPLE THICKNESS 0.4" WOODEN STAKE AND STAPLES FABRICATING DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2 X 4 STUD CUT TO 18" LONG FINISHED STAKES 1 FT MIN. 2 FT MIN. KEY TRENCH DETAIL TERMINATION TRENCH NOT TO SCALE 1 FT MIN. 2 FT MIN. KEY TRENCH DETAIL TRANSITION TRENCH NOT TO SCALE TOE DETAIL BIODEGRADABLE FABRICS AND STAKES NOT TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES ON SECURING COIR FABRIC 1. SECURE THE OUTER FABRIC (WOVEN, WHERE APPLICABLE), WITH A WOODEN STAKE THROUGH THE FABRIC ON 3 FT CENTERS (SEE DETAIL VIEW 2) NOTE: THE HOLES FOR STAKES SHALL NOT BE PRECUT. ALLOW THE STAKE TO BREAK THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF STRANDS AS IT IS BEING DRIVEN IN. DRIVE STAKES SO THAT 2" TO 3" OF THE TOP OF THE STAKE IS LEFT EXPOSED. 2. OUTER FABRIC ENDS SHALL BE JOINED BY LAPPING THE UPSTREAM PIECE OF FABRIC OVER THE DOWNSTREAM PIECE AS SHOWN IN SECTION B-B. OVERLAPS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 FT, INNER FABRIC ENDS SHALL BE BUTTED TOGETHER, NOT OVERLAPPED. OVERLAPS SHALL BE STAGGERED FROM LIFT TO LIFT BY A MINIMUM OF 15 FT. 3. STAKE AND STAPLE SPACING IS DEFINED IN SPECIFICATIONS FOR FES LIFT AND SURFACE FABRIC. 3/4" PLYWOOD 8 FT 1. 5 F T M A X . 2 FT 90° 1 FT2 FT TYPICAL DETAIL STREAM BANK CONSTRUCTION FORM - FES LIFT NOT TO SCALE 90° TYPICAL DETAIL STREAM BANK CONSTRUCTION FORM - FES LIFT NOT TO SCALE 1 - 1 . 5 F T 3 FT 1. 2.3.4.5.6. 1 - 1.5 FT SUGGESTED CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE FES LIFT - BOX ENDS NOT TO SCALE 3 FT DOWNSTREAM FABRIC LAYER LAPS UNDER TYPICAL DETAIL FABRIC JOINING 3 FT MIN. OVERLAP FLOW NOT TO SCALE B B' FLOW SECTION A - A' FABRIC FOLD NOT TO SCALE FLOW 1 FT MIN 2 FT UPSTREAM FABRI C L A P S O V E R DOWNSTREAM F A B R I C L A P S U N D E R ISOMETRIC DETAIL FABRIC JOINING NOT TO SCALE UPSTREAM FABRIC LAYER LAPS OVER BY 3 FT MIN. 45° SECTION B - B' FABRIC JOINING NOT TO SCALE FLOW 3 FT MIN. OVERLAP DOWNSTREAM FABRIC LAYER LAPS UNDER UPSTREAM FABRIC LAYER LAPS OVER TYPICAL DETAIL FOLDING OF OUTER FABRIC NOT TO SCALE FLOW A' A ALL FABRIC FORMS WILL BE LAPPED IN AN UPSTREAM TO DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION MAX. ANGLE 15° 1 FT 1 TYP 4 TYP 5 TYP 6 TYP 7 TYP 2 TYP 3 TYP 9 TYP 10 TYP 8 TYP FILL KEY TRENCH WITH TOPSOIL AND COMPACT OVER COIR FABRIC STAKE FABRIC TO BOTTOM OF KEY TRENCH EVERY 3 L.FT FILL KEY TRENCH WITH TOPSOIL AND COMPACT OVER COIR FABRIC WOVEN COIR FABRIC WRAP WOVEN (OUTER) COIR FABRIC NON-WOVEN (INNER) COIR FABRIC NATIVE SEED MIX FILL OR NATIVE SOIL WOODEN STAKES ON 3 FT CENTERS 1/4" LAG BOLT WITH NUT AND WASHER (TYPICAL) 1 " SQUARE STEEL TUBING UPRIGHT 1/4" X 2" STRAP STEEL LEGS RECTANGULAR FRAME 1 " SQUARE STEEL TUBING 1/4" LAG BOLT WITH NUT AND WASHER (TYPICAL) WELDED JOINTS (TYPICAL) 3/4" PLYWOOD BOLTED TO STEEL FRAME 1/4" X 2" STRAP STEEL LEG EDGE OF EXCAVATION CUT EXISTING STREAMBANK OR ADJACENT TREATMENT WHERE PRESENT, EMBED FABRICS INSTALLED ON ADJACENT SLOPE BEHIND FES LIFTS FES LIFT EXCAVATION LIMIT BOX END SEQUENCE DETAIL REMOVE SHADED PORTION NOTE: FES LIFT INNER FABRIC SHOULD BE INSTALLED WITHIN BOTH VERTICAL FACES OF THE BOX END STAKES THROUGH BOTTOM FABRIC LAYERSTAKES 3 FT OC IN STAGGERED ROWS CONSTRUCTION FORM STAKES THROUGH BOTH FABRIC LAYERS KEY TRENCH STAKE THROUGH BOTTOM FABRIC LAYER STAKES THOUGH BOTH FABRIC LAYERS INNER FABRIC TO BE BUTTED TOGETHER CONSTRUCTION FORM STAKES 3 FT OC IN STAGGERED ROWS FABRIC FOLD STAKES STAPLES 18 IN OC IN STAGGERED ROWS STAPLES 18 IN OC IN STAGGERED ROWS EDGE OF FABRIC 4 IN. (MIN.) FROM STAKE EDGE OF FABRIC 4 IN. (MIN.) FROM STAKE) STAKE FABRIC TO BOTTOM OF KEY TRENCH EVERY 3 L. FT 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 15 TYPICAL DETAILS FES LIFTS 3 FT EMBEDMENT 1 FT INNER (NON-WOVEN) FABRIC APPLY SEED TO FIRST 3 FT OF SOIL FIG D. FIG B. FIG A. FIG C. BANK SIDE STREAM SIDE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR FABRIC ENCAPSULATED LIFTS 1.BANKS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN EITHER AN UPSTREAM OR DOWNSTREAM DIRECTION, AS LONG AS THE FABRIC IS OVERLAPPED IN THE PROPER DIRECTION. 2.PLACE A SERIES OF THREE OR MORE FORMS ON THE GROUND SO THAT THE FORMS FOLLOW THE PROPOSED STREAM BANK ALIGNMENT. BUTT THE ENDS OF THE FORMS TIGHTLY TOGETHER. 3.UNROLL THE OUTER FABRIC PARALLEL TO THE LONG AXIS OF THE CHANNEL AND POSITION IT SO THAT 3 FEET EXTENDS FOR EMBEDMENT ON THE BANK SIDE OF THE FORMS (FIG B), AND A MINIMUM 3 FEET EXTENDS LENGTHWISE BEYOND THE LAST FORM FOR OVERLAP. DRAPE THE REMAINDER OF THE FABRIC OVER THE TOP OF THE FORMS ON THE STREAM SIDE (FIG B). 4.UNROLL THE INNER FABRIC OVER THE TOP OF THE WOVEN COIR FABRIC (FIG B) AND POSITION IT SO THAT AT LEAST 1 FOOT OF THE INNER FABRIC EXTENDS AS AN EMBEDMENT LENGTH ON THE BANK SIDE OF THE FORMS (FIG C). DRAPE THE REMAINDER OF THE FABRIC OVER THE TOP OF THE FORMS ON THE STREAM SIDE AND ALIGN THE LONG EDGES OF THE FABRICS. STRETCH AND PULL THE FABRIC LAYERS TO REMOVE WRINKLES. 5.APPLY NATIVE SEED MIX TO INNER FABRIC ALONG VERTICAL EDGE OF LIFT (FIG C). PLACE TOPSOIL/CHANNEL BANK STONE OVER THE FABRIC ON THE BANK SIDE OF THE FORMS. 6.APPLY NATIVE SEED MIX TO TOP OF FILL (FIG C). 7.FOLD THE LOOSE ENDS OF THE TWO COIR FABRIC LAYERS BACK OVER THE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL AND STRETCH TIGHTLY TO REMOVE WRINKLES (FIG D). SECURE WITH WOODEN STAKES 1 PER 3 L.F. ALONG THE BACK EDGE AND INTO UNDISTURBED SOIL. 8.REMOVE THE FORMS FROM THE FRONT OF THE COMPLETED LIFTS (FIG. 2). LEAVE THE LAST FORM IN PLACE AT THE END OF THE NEWLY CONSTRUCTED LIFT (FIG. 2). 9.WHERE THE TOP OF THE LIFT MEETS THE GROUND SURFACE, EXCAVATE A KEY TRENCH 1 FOOT DEEP ALONG THE EDGE OF THE OUTER FABRIC LAYER, PARALLEL TO THE FORMS. SEED ENTIRE AREA OF TOP LIFT. SECURE FABRIC IN THE TRENCH WITH WOODEN STAKES, 3 FT O.C. TO TRANSITION TO EITHER SURFACE FABRIC OR STRAW EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. 10.SUPPLEMENT LIFT STAKING WITH ADDITIONAL WOODEN STAPLES ON 18" CENTERS EXCEPT WHERE WOODEN STAKES HAVE ALREADY BEEN PLACED. 9 15 2 15 1 15 FIG E. SUGGESTED SEQUENCE FOR PLACEMENT OF FORMS PROFILE VIEW LOOKING INTO BANK FIG 1. PLACE A ROW OF CONSTRUCTION FORMS ALONG DESIRED CHANNEL ALIGNMENT FOR FIRST FES LIFT. FIG 2. CONSTRUCT FES LIFTS ALONG LENGTH OF FIRST SET OF FORMS AND THEN BEGIN PLACEMENT OF FORMS AND CONSTRUCTION OF SECOND LIFT. COMPLETED LENGTH OF FES LIFT CONSTRUCTION FORM OUTER FABRIC (WOVEN) INNER FABRIC (NON-WOVEN) APPLY SEED TO FABRIC FACE STAKE THROUGH BOTH LAYERS 6" BACK FROM FRONT EDGE EXISTING GROUND FOLD BOTH INNER AND OUTER FABRIC OVER SOIL FILL WITH TOPSOIL AFTER SEEDING FACE PREPARE LEVEL SUB-GRADE REMOVE CONSTRUCTION FORM PRIOR TO FLATTENING LIFT TO 45° FLATTEN STREAM SIDE OF LIFT TO 45° FOLLOWING INSTALLATION PLACE STAPLES ON 18 IN. CENTERS TIE INTO SURFACE FABRIC OR STRAW EROSION CONTROL BLANKET STAKE FABRICS IN PLACE ON 3 FT CENTERS. SEE FABRIC STAKING AND TRENCHING SHEET 14 162121 Randolph Ave, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55105 (651) 243-9700 www.interfluve.comDATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKED APPROVED DRAWN DATE DESIGNED SHEET OF CP DM MM, DM 5/9/2018 MM, DM 18-04-01 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT EDINA, MINNESOTA ARDEN PARK CREEK RESTORATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Signature: ______________________________________________ Typed or Printed Name: ___________________________________ Date: _________________ License Number: __________________5/9/18 44129 JONATHON KUSADRAFT 16 TYPICAL DETAILS FES LIFTS TRD 128 TRD 2089 TRD 2483 TRD 2090 TRD 2486 TRD 2091 TRC 2484 TRD 2092 TRC 2485 TRD 2498TRD 2488 TRC 2500 TRD 2094 TRC 2093 TRC 2096 TRC 2493 TRC 2492 TRD 2095TRC 2066 TRC 2487 TRC 2067 TRC 2480 TRD 2068 TRD 2482 TRD 2481 TRC 2070 TRD 2069 TRC 2071 TRC 2073 TRC 2475 TRD 2072 TRD 2081 TRD 2413 TRD 2469 TRD 2082 TRC 2489 TRD 2478 TRD 2412 TRD 2410 TRD 2433 TRD 2432 TRD 2060 TRC 2061 TRD 2062 TRC 2064 TRC 2065 TRC 2086 TRC 2088 TRD 2087 TRC 2083 TRD 2084 TRD 2455 TRC 2063 TRC 2467 TRD 2409 TRD 2423 TRD 2424 TRC 2443 TRD 2434 TRD 2422 TRD 136 TRD 134TRD 2447 TRD 2453 TRD 133 TRD 2454 TRD 129 TRD 131 TRD 132 TRD 2415 TRD 2057TRD 2056 TRD 2056 TRD 2058 TRD 2059 TRD 2420 TRD 2055 TRD 2436 TRD 265 TRD 2439 TRD 2456TRD 2459 TRD 2460 TRD 2435 TRD 2414TRD 689TRD 688 TRD 700 TRD 699 TRD 697 TRD 692 TRD 695 TRD 694 TRD 687 TRD 693 TRD 698 TRD 696 TRD 690 TRD 691 TRD 679 TRD 680 TRD 681 TRD 682 TRD 683TRD 684 TRD 685 TRD 2465 TRD 517 TRD 410 TRD 412 TRD 420 TRD 446 TRD 135 TRD 686 TRD 2425 TRD 2427 TRD 411 TRD 178 TRD 173 TRD 174 TRD 175 TRD 153 TRD 154 TRD 148 TRD 138 TRD 141 TRD 140TRD 139 TRD 2188 TRD 172 TRD 2187 TRD 2184 TRD 162 TRD 161 TRD 160 TRD 2100 TRD 159 TRD 158 TRD 2287 TRD 157 TRD 156 TRD 155 TRD 151TRD 2289 TRD 2297 TRD 2296 TRD 150 TRD 149 TRD 2290 TRD 2288 TRD 147 TRD 146 TRD 145 TRD 2202TRD 2291TRD 2294 TRD 143 TRD 2203 TRD 2204 TRD 2299 TRD 2300 TRC 2205 TRC 2207 TRD 2295 TRD 2208 TRD 2235 TRD 2293 TRD 2298 TRD 2292 TRD 2234 TRD 2233 TRD 2210 TRD 2212 TRD 2211 TRD 2213 TRD 2232 TRD 2231 TRD 2229 TRD 2228 TRD 2217 TRD 2221TRD 2220 TRD 2216 TRD 2222 TRD 2223 TRD 2264 TRD 2265 TRD 2226 TRD 2226 TRD 2225 TRD 2227 TRD 2269TRD 2270 TRD 2268 TRD 2267 TRD 142 TRD 2218TRD 2286 TRD 2247 TRD 2246 TRD 2285 TRD 2245 TRD 2281 TRD 2244 TRD 2243 TRD 2242 TRD 2241 TRD 2239TRD 2240 TRD 2238 TRD 2248 TRD 2249 TRD 2263TRD 2250 TRD 2251 TRD 2236 TRD 2237 TRD 2253 TRD 2252 TRD 2254 TRD 2255 TRD 2256 TRD 2257 TRD 2258 TRD 2278 TRD 2277 TRD 2259 TRD 2260 TRD 2261 TRD 2276 TRD 2275 TRD 2262 TRD 2282 TRD 2283 TRD 2272 TRD 2274TRD 2284 TRD 2273 TRD 2519 TRD 2518 TRD 2517 TRD 2516 TRD 2515 TRD 2514 TRD 2513 TRD 2512 TRD 2512 TRD 2510 TRD 2509 TRD 2508 TRD 2507 TRD 2506 TRD 2505 TRD 2501 TRD 2503 TRD 2502 TRD 2520 TRD 2582 TRD 2521 TRD 2504 TRD 2561 TRD 2574TRD 2573 TRD 2572 TRD 2571 TRD 2522 TRD 2523 TRD 2569 TRD 2568TRD 2524 TRD 2566 TRD 2525 TRD 2567 TRD 2526 TRD 2527 TRD 2570 TRD 2528 TRD 2529 TRD 2532 TRD 2531TRD 2530TRD 2533 TRD 2557 TRD 2565 TRD 2560 TRD 2564 TRD 2556 TRD 2554 TRD 2546 TRD 2545TRD 2541 TRD 2540 TRD 2539 TRD 2538 TRD 2600 TRD 2537 TRD 2535 TRD 2581 TRD 2580 TRC 2534 TRD 2536TRD 2575 TRD 2576 TRD 2599 TRD 2583 TRD 2598 TRD 2597 TRD 2577 TRD 2578 TRD 2563 TRD 2562 TRD 2596TRD 2595 TRD 2594 TRD 2593 TRD 2592 TRD 2590TRD 2591 TRD 2588 TRD 2589 TRD 2587 TRD 2586 TRD 2558 TRD 2279 TRD 2585 TRD 2584 TRD 2579 TRD 2542 TRD 2559 TRD 2543 TRD 2547 TRD 2548 TRD 2549 TRD 2550 TRD 2551 TRD 2552 TRD 2553 TRD 2555 TRD 2544 TRD 2801 TRD 2802 TRD 2803 TRD 2804 TRD 2805 TRD 2806 TRD 2807 TRD 2808 TRD 2810 TRD 2811 TRD 2812 TRD 2813 TRD 2814 TRD 2815 TRD 2816 TRD 2817 TRD 2818 TRD 2819 TRD 2820 TRD 2821 TRD 2827 TRD 2826TRD 2824 TRD 2809 TRD 2876 TRD 2875 TRD 2900 TRD 2825 TRD 2823 TRD 2822 TRD 2828 TRD 2829 TRD 2830 TRD 2831 TRD 2832 TRD 2833TRD 2834 TRD 2835 TRD 2839 TRD 2840 TRD 2841 TRD 2836 TRD 2631 TRD 2632 TRD 2633 TRD 2634 TRD 2636 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II III IIIIIIIII II II II II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II II IIIII II III I I I I I I I I I I I I IIII II II IIIIIII II II II I I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I IIII IIIIIIIIII I I II I I II I I II I I II I III III I I I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I IIIIIIIIIII II I II IIII IIIIIII III I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II IIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II II >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX X XXXXXXX XXXXX X XXXXXX XXX XX XXXXX XXX XX X X X X XXXXXXX X XXX X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 888 886 884 LANDING BOARDWALK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN RENOVATED PARK LAWN RE-CONFIGURED ICE RINK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FLOODPLAIN FOREST FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FLOODPLAIN FOREST FLOODPLAIN FOREST LANDING LANDING CREEK ACCESS RELOCATE UTILITY POLE RELOCATE HYDRANT EXISTING HOCKEY RINK N O T E : T H I S D R A W I N G I S 2 2 " X 3 4 " . D O N O T S C A L E D R A W I N G S . U S E F I G U R E D D I M E N S I O N S O N L Y , O R S E E K C L A R I F I C A T I O N F R O M A R C H I T E C T F O R M E A S U R E M E N T S T H A T A R E N O T I N D I C A T E D . I S S U E D A T E N O S C A L E : D A T E / R E V I S I O N S D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : R O L A N D S . A B E R G I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n , s p e c i f i c a t i o n , o r r e p o r t w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d I a m a d u l y l i c e n s e d L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . L i c e n s e N o : 4 7 4 5 4 D a t e : © 2 0 1 7 H A R T H O W E R T O N , L T D . P L A N N E R S , A R C H I T E C T S , L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S T h e d e s i g n s a n d c o n c e p t s s h o w n a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f H a r t H o w e r t o n . T h e d r a w i n g s m a y n o t b e u s e d e x c e p t w i t h t h e e x p r e s s e d w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f H a r t H o w e r t o n . # # # # 5 / 1 3 / 1 8 # # # # # # # # 6 0 % S E T # # # # # # # # # # # # City of Edina Edina, Minnesota NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN PATH LIGHTING PEDESTRIAN A S N O T E D Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ARDEN PARK1 6 - 0 2 8 L - 4 . 1 R S A J A L FIXTURE SHOWN: STERNBERG LIGHTING MODEL SOLANA SL660 LED PEDESTRIAN POST TOP LIGHT. POWDER COAT COLOR FINISH TO BE DETERMINED. 12 TOTAL FIXTURES AS SHOWN PEDESTRIAN POLE LIGHT ON CONCRETE BASE, 12 FT. MOUNTING HEIGHT 100 FT. MAXIMUM SPACING DIMENSION TRD 128 TRD 2089 TRD 2483 TRD 2090 TRD 2486 TRD 2091 TRC 2484 TRD 2092 TRC 2485 TRD 2498TRD 2488 TRC 2500 TRD 2094 TRC 2093 TRC 2096 TRC 2493 TRC 2492 TRD 2095TRC 2066 TRC 2487 TRC 2067 TRC 2480 TRD 2068 TRD 2482 TRD 2481 TRC 2070 TRD 2069 TRC 2071 TRC 2073 TRC 2475 TRD 2072 TRD 2081 TRD 2413 TRD 2469 TRD 2082 TRC 2489 TRD 2478 TRD 2412 TRD 2410 TRD 2433 TRD 2432 TRD 2060 TRC 2061 TRD 2062 TRC 2064 TRC 2065 TRC 2086 TRC 2088 TRD 2087 TRC 2083 TRD 2084 TRD 2455 TRC 2063 TRC 2467 TRD 2409 TRD 2423 TRD 2424 TRC 2443 TRD 2434 TRD 2422 TRD 136 TRD 134TRD 2447 TRD 2453 TRD 133 TRD 2454 TRD 129 TRD 131 TRD 132 TRD 2415 TRD 2057TRD 2056 TRD 2056 TRD 2058 TRD 2059 TRD 2420 TRD 2055 TRD 2436 TRD 265 TRD 2439 TRD 2456TRD 2459 TRD 2460 TRD 2435 TRD 2414TRD 689TRD 688 TRD 700 TRD 699 TRD 697 TRD 692 TRD 695 TRD 694 TRD 687 TRD 693 TRD 698 TRD 696 TRD 690 TRD 691 TRD 679 TRD 680 TRD 681 TRD 682 TRD 683TRD 684 TRD 685 TRD 2465 TRD 517 TRD 410 TRD 412 TRD 420 TRD 446 TRD 135 TRD 686 TRD 2425 TRD 2427 TRD 411 TRD 178 TRD 173 TRD 174 TRD 175 TRD 153 TRD 154 TRD 148 TRD 138 TRD 141 TRD 140TRD 139 TRD 2188 TRD 172TRD 2187 TRD 2184 TRD 162 TRD 161 TRD 160 TRD 2100 TRD 159 TRD 158 TRD 2287 TRD 157 TRD 156 TRD 155 TRD 151TRD 2289 TRD 2297 TRD 2296 TRD 150 TRD 149 TRD 2290 TRD 2288 TRD 147 TRD 146 TRD 145 TRD 2202TRD 2291TRD 2294 TRD 143 TRD 2203 TRD 2204 TRD 2299 TRD 2300 TRC 2205 TRC 2207 TRD 2295 TRD 2208 TRD 2235 TRD 2293 TRD 2298 TRD 2292 TRD 2234 TRD 2233 TRD 2210 TRD 2212 TRD 2211 TRD 2213 TRD 2232 TRD 2231 TRD 2229 TRD 2228 TRD 2217 TRD 2221TRD 2220 TRD 2216 TRD 2222 TRD 2223 TRD 2264 TRD 2265 TRD 2226 TRD 2226 TRD 2225 TRD 2227 TRD 2269TRD 2270 TRD 2268 TRD 2267 TRD 142 TRD 2218TRD 2286 TRD 2247 TRD 2246 TRD 2285 TRD 2245 TRD 2281 TRD 2244 TRD 2243 TRD 2242 TRD 2241 TRD 2239TRD 2240 TRD 2238 TRD 2248 TRD 2249 TRD 2263TRD 2250 TRD 2251 TRD 2236 TRD 2237 TRD 2253 TRD 2252 TRD 2254 TRD 2255 TRD 2256 TRD 2257 TRD 2258 TRD 2278 TRD 2277 TRD 2259 TRD 2260 TRD 2261 TRD 2276 TRD 2275 TRD 2262 TRD 2282 TRD 2283 TRD 2272 TRD 2274TRD 2284 TRD 2273 TRD 2519 TRD 2518 TRD 2517 TRD 2516 TRD 2515 TRD 2514 TRD 2513 TRD 2512 TRD 2512 TRD 2510 TRD 2509 TRD 2508 TRD 2507 TRD 2506 TRD 2505 TRD 2501 TRD 2503 TRD 2502 TRD 2520 TRD 2582 TRD 2521 TRD 2504 TRD 2561 TRD 2574TRD 2573 TRD 2572 TRD 2571 TRD 2522 TRD 2523 TRD 2569 TRD 2568TRD 2524 TRD 2566 TRD 2525 TRD 2567 TRD 2526 TRD 2527 TRD 2570 TRD 2528 TRD 2529 TRD 2532 TRD 2531TRD 2530TRD 2533 TRD 2557 TRD 2565 TRD 2560 TRD 2564 TRD 2556 TRD 2554 TRD 2546 TRD 2545TRD 2541 TRD 2540 TRD 2539 TRD 2538 TRD 2600 TRD 2537 TRD 2535 TRD 2581 TRD 2580 TRC 2534 TRD 2536TRD 2575 TRD 2576 TRD 2599 TRD 2583 TRD 2598 TRD 2597 TRD 2577 TRD 2578 TRD 2563 TRD 2562 TRD 2596TRD 2595 TRD 2594 TRD 2593 TRD 2592 TRD 2590TRD 2591 TRD 2588 TRD 2589 TRD 2587 TRD 2586 TRD 2558 TRD 2279 TRD 2585 TRD 2584 TRD 2579 TRD 2542 TRD 2559 TRD 2543 TRD 2547 TRD 2548 TRD 2549 TRD 2550 TRD 2551 TRD 2552 TRD 2553 TRD 2555 TRD 2544 TRD 2801 TRD 2802 TRD 2803 TRD 2804 TRD 2805 TRD 2806 TRD 2807 TRD 2808 TRD 2810 TRD 2811 TRD 2812 TRD 2813 TRD 2814 TRD 2815 TRD 2816 TRD 2817 TRD 2818 TRD 2819 TRD 2820 TRD 2821 TRD 2827 TRD 2826TRD 2824 TRD 2809 TRD 2876 TRD 2875 TRD 2900 TRD 2825 TRD 2823 TRD 2822 TRD 2828 TRD 2829 TRD 2830 TRD 2831 TRD 2832 TRD 2833TRD 2834 TRD 2835 TRD 2839 TRD 2840 TRD 2841 TRD 2836 TRD 2631 TRD 2632 TRD 2633 TRD 2634 TRD 2636 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II IIIIIII IIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II III I I I I I I I I I I I I II II IIIIIII II II IIIIII I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I IIIIIIII IIIII I I I II I I II I I II I I II I I I I III I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I IIIIIIIIIII II I IIIIII IIII IIIIII I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II IIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II II >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X XX X XX XXXXX X XXXXX X X XXXXX X XXXXX X XXXXXX X XXXXX X XXXXXX X XXXXX X XXX XXXXXXX XXX X XX X X X XX XXXXX X X X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 888 890 886 884 878 880 882 884 886 882 888 886 884 882 880 878 877 877 PARK SHELTER FFE 866.1 LANDING BOARDWALK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN RENOVATED PARK LAWN RE-CONFIGURED ICE RINK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FLOODPLAIN FOREST FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FLOODPLAIN FOREST FLOODPLAIN FOREST LANDING LANDING CREEK ACCESS RELOCATE UTILITY POLE RELOCATE HYDRANT EXISTING HOCKEY RINK N O T E : T H I S D R A W I N G I S 2 2 " X 3 4 " . D O N O T S C A L E D R A W I N G S . U S E F I G U R E D D I M E N S I O N S O N L Y , O R S E E K C L A R I F I C A T I O N F R O M A R C H I T E C T F O R M E A S U R E M E N T S T H A T A R E N O T I N D I C A T E D . I S S U E D A T E N O S C A L E : D A T E / R E V I S I O N S D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : R O L A N D S . A B E R G I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n , s p e c i f i c a t i o n , o r r e p o r t w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n a n d I a m a d u l y l i c e n s e d L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e S t a t e o f M i n n e s o t a . L i c e n s e N o : 4 7 4 5 4 D a t e : © 2 0 1 7 H A R T H O W E R T O N , L T D . P L A N N E R S , A R C H I T E C T S , L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S T h e d e s i g n s a n d c o n c e p t s s h o w n a r e t h e s o l e p r o p e r t y o f H a r t H o w e r t o n . T h e d r a w i n g s m a y n o t b e u s e d e x c e p t w i t h t h e e x p r e s s e d w r i t t e n c o n s e n t o f H a r t H o w e r t o n . # # # # 5 / 1 3 / 1 8 # # # # # # # # 6 0 % S E T # # # # # # # # # # # # City of Edina Edina, Minnesota NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE OVERALL A S N O T E D Minnehaha Creek Watershed District ARDEN PARK1 6 - 0 2 8 L - 0 . 1 R S A J A L N O R T H L - 0 . 1 O V E R A L L L A N D S C A P E S I T E P L A N L - 1 . 1 S I T E L A Y O U T A N D G R A D I N G P L A N L - 1 . 2 S I T E L A Y O U T A N D G R A D I N G P L A N L - 1 . 3 S I T E L A Y O U T A N D G R A D I N G P L A N L - 2 . 1 P L A N T I N G P L A N L - 2 . 2 P L A N T I N G P L A N L - 2 . 3 P L A N T I N G P L A N L - 2 . 4 P L A N T L I S T A N D P L A N T I N G D E T A I L S L - 3 . 1 N O R T H B R I D G E P L A N A N D E L E V A T I O N L - 3 . 2 S O U T H B R I D G E P L A N A N D E L E V A T I O N L - 3 . 3 D E T A I L E D P L A N S A N D S E C T I O N S L - 3 . 4 D E T A I L E D P L A N S A N D S E C T I O N S L - 3 . 5 L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S A N D S E C T I O N S L - 4 . 1 P E D E S T R I A N P A T H L I G H T I N G P L A N L A N D S C A P E S H E E T I N D E X TRD 128 TRD 2089 TRD 2483 TRD 2090 TRD 2486 TRD 2091 TRC 2484 TRD 2092 TRC 2485 TRD 2498TRD 2488 TRC 2500 TRD 2094 TRC 2093 TRC 2096 TRC 2493 TRC 2492 TRD 2095TRC 2066 TRC 2487 TRC 2067 TRC 2480 TRD 2068 TRD 2482 TRD 2481 TRC 2070 TRD 2069 TRC 2071 TRC 2073 TRD 2081 TRD 2413 TRD 2469 TRD 2082 TRC 2489 TRD 2478 TRD 2412 TRD 2410 TRD 2433 TRD 2432 TRD 2060 TRC 2061 TRD 2062 TRC 2064 TRC 2065 TRC 2086 TRC 2088 TRD 2087 TRC 2083 TRD 2084 TRD 2455 TRC 2063 TRC 2467 TRD 2409 TRD 2423 TRD 2424 TRC 2443 TRD 2434 TRD 2422 TRD 136 TRD 134TRD 2447 TRD 2453 TRD 133 TRD 2454 TRD 129 TRD 131 TRD 132 TRD 2415 TRD 2057TRD 2056 TRD 2056 TRD 2058 TRD 2059 TRD 2420 TRD 2055 TRD 2436 TRD 265 TRD 2439 TRD 2456TRD 2459 TRD 2460 TRD 2435 TRD 2414TRD 689TRD 688 TRD 700 TRD 699 TRD 697 TRD 692 TRD 695 TRD 694 TRD 687 TRD 693 TRD 698 TRD 2519 TRD 2518 TRD 2517 TRD 2516 TRD 2515 TRD 2514 TRD 2513 TRD 2512 TRD 2512 TRD 2510 TRD 2509 TRD 2508 TRD 2507 TRD 2506 TRD 2505 TRD 2568TRD 2524 TRD 2566 TRD 2525 TRD 2567 TRD 2526 TRD 2527 TRD 2570 TRD 2528 TRD 2529 TRD 2532 TRD 2531TRD 2530TRD 2533 TRD 2557 TRD 2565 TRD 2560 TRD 2564 TRD 2556 TRD 2554 TRD 2546 TRD 2545TRD 2541 TRD 2540 TRD 2539 TRD 2538 TRD 2600 TRD 2537 TRD 2535 TRD 2581 TRD 2580 TRC 2534 TRD 2536TRD 2575 TRD 2576 TRD 2599 TRD 2583 TRD 2598 TRD 2597 TRD 2577 TRD 2578 TRD 2563 TRD 2562 TRD 2596TRD 2595 TRD 2594 TRD 2593 TRD 2592 TRD 2590TRD 2591 TRD 2588 TRD 2589 TRD 2587 TRD 2586 TRD 2558 TRD 2279 TRD 2585 TRD 2584 TRD 2579 TRD 2542 TRD 2559 TRD 2543 TRD 2547 TRD 2548 TRD 2549 TRD 2550 TRD 2551 TRD 2552 TRD 2553 TRD 2555 TRD 2544 TRD 2801 TRD 2802 TRD 2803 TRD 2804 TRD 2805 TRD 2806 TRD 2807 TRD 2808 TRD 2810 TRD 2811 TRD 2812 TRD 2813 TRD 2814 TRD 2815 TRD 2816 TRD 2817 TRD 2818 TRD 2819 TRD 2820 TRD 2821 TRD 2827 TRD 2826TRD 2824 TRD 2809 TRD 2876 TRD 2875 TRD 2900 TRD 2825 TRD 2823 TRD 2822 TRD 2828 TRD 2829 TRD 2830 TRD 2831 TRD 2832 TRD 2833TRD 2834 TRD 2835 TRD 2839 TRD 2840 TRD 2841 IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II III II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIIIII II II IIII I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I II II II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIII I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I II I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIII I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I II I II I III I I II I I II I I I I I II I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I II I I II I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIII II I >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> PARK SHELTER FFE 866.1 LANDING BOARDWALK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN RENOVATED PARK LAWN RE-CONFIGURED ICE RINK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FLOODPLAIN FOREST FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND LANDING RELOCATE UTILITY POLE NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 60% SET05/13/18 Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N GR A D I N G P L A N LA Y O U T A N D SI T E AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-1.1 RSA JAL . NORTH NOTES AND LEGEND 8' WIDE MAIN PARK BITUMINOUS TRAIL, OR PERMEABLE UNIT PAVER (ALTERNATE) BIOFILTRATION SWALE TYPICAL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 5' WIDE BIT.TRAIL, OR PERMEABLE UNIT PAVER (ALT.) LAWN LAWN WOOD SWALE CROSSING, SEE 2/L-3.4 SOUTH BRIDGE, SEE L-3.2 PLAZA, N.I.C N.I.C 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK WOOD STAIRS, SEE 2/L-3.3 REALIGNED CREEK WOOD SWALE CROSSING, SEE 1/L-3.4 5' WIDE BITMINOUS TRAIL, OR PERMEABLE UNIT PAVER (ALTERNATE) LANDING, SEE 7/L-3.5 WOOD BOARDWALK, SEE 4,5/L-3.4 NORTH BRIDGE, SEE L-3.1 N.I.C SEE 7/L-3.5 MATCH LINE, SEE L-1.2 CULVERT, TYPICAL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS TRD 2069 TRC 2071 TRC 2073 TRC 2475 TRD 2072 TRC 2443 TRD 2434 TRD 2422 TRD 697 TRD 692 TRD 695 TRD 694 TRD 687 TRD 693 TRD 698 TRD 696 TRD 690 TRD 691 TRD 679 TRD 680 TRD 681 TRD 682 TRD 683TRD 684 TRD 685 TRD 2465 TRD 517 TRD 410 TRD 412 TRD 420 TRD 446 TRD 135 TRD 686 TRD 2425 TRD 2427 TRD 411 TRD 178 TRD 173 TRD 174 TRD 175 TRD 153 TRD 154 TRD 148 TRD 138 TRD 141 TRD 140TRD 139 TRD 2188 TRD 172 TRD 2187 TRD 2184 TRD 162 TRD 2267 TRD 142 TRD 2218TRD 2286 TRD 2247 TRD 2246 TRD 2285 TRD 2245 TRD 2281 TRD 2244 TRD 2243 TRD 2242 TRD 2241 TRD 2239TRD 2240 TRD 2238 TRD 2248 TRD 2249 TRD 2263TRD 2250 TRD 2251 TRD 2236 TRD 2237 TRD 2253 TRD 2252 TRD 2254 TRD 2255 TRD 2256 TRD 2257 TRD 2258 TRD 2278 TRD 2277 TRD 2259 TRD 2260 TRD 2261 TRD 2276 TRD 2275 TRD 2262 TRD 2282 TRD 2283 TRD 2272 TRD 2274TRD 2284 TRD 2273 TRD 2501 TRD 2503 TRD 2502 TRD 2520 TRD 2582 TRD 2521 TRD 2504 TRD 2561 TRD 2574TRD 2573 TRD 2572 TRD 2571 TRD 2522 TRD 2523 TRD 2569 TRD 2568TRD 2524 TRD 2566 TRD 2525 TRD 2567 TRD 2526 TRD 2527 TRD 2570 TRD 2528 TRD 2529 TRD 2532 TRD 2531TRD 2530TRD 2533 TRD 2557 TRD 2565 TRD 2560 TRD 2564 TRD 2545TRD 2541 II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIIIII II II II IIIII II II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II III II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I IIII IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I III I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I III IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I IIII IIII IIIIIII IIII IIIIII I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I IIIIII II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIII II II II II X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X XXXXXXX X XXXXX XXXXXXX X XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX X XXXXXXX XXXXX X XXXXXXX XXXXX X XXXXXXX XX XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XX XX X XX XXXXXX XX XXX X X XXX XXX X XXX X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 888 890 886 884 888 886 884 882 880 EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FLOODPLAIN FOREST FLOODPLAIN FOREST LANDING EXISTING HOCKEY RINK NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 05/13/18 60% SET Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N GR A D I N G P L A N LA Y O U T A N D SI T E AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-1.2 RSA JAL NORTH NOTES AND LEGEND BIOFILTRATION SWALE; TYPICAL SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS 4' WIDE CRUSHED GRANITE PATH REALIGNED CREEKEXISTING STAIRS; REPLACE WITH 4/L3.5 (SIMILAR). INSTALL HANDRAIL ON ONE SIDE, SEE 5/L3.5 SECTION WITH TRAIL AND WALL, SEE 2/L-3.5 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ICE HOCKEY RINK TO REMAIN SECTION WITH TRAIL AND WALL, SEE 1/L-3.5 MATCH LINE, SEE L-1.3 MATCH LINE, SEE L-1.1 8' WIDE PARK TRAIL, BITUMINOUS 5' WIDE CONCRETE SIDEWALK CULVERT, TYPICAL, SEE CIVIL DRAWINGS TRD 153 TRD 154 TRD 148 TRD 138 TRD 141 TRD 140TRD 139 TRD 172 TRD 2187 TRD 2184 TRD 162 TRD 161 TRD 160 TRD 2100 TRD 159 TRD 158 TRD 2287 TRD 157 TRD 156 TRD 155 TRD 151TRD 2289 TRD 2297 TRD 2296 TRD 150 TRD 149 TRD 2290 TRD 2288 TRD 147 TRD 146 TRD 145 TRD 2202TRD 2291TRD 2294 TRD 143 TRD 2203 TRD 2204 TRD 2299 TRD 2300 TRC 2205 TRC 2207 TRD 2295 TRD 2208 TRD 2235 TRD 2293 TRD 2298 TRD 2292 TRD 2234 TRD 2233 TRD 2210 TRD 2212 TRD 2211 TRD 2213 TRD 2232 TRD 2231 TRD 2229 TRD 2228 TRD 2217 TRD 2221TRD 2220 TRD 2216 TRD 2222 TRD 2223 TRD 2264 TRD 2265 TRD 2226 TRD 2226 TRD 2225 TRD 2227 TRD 2269TRD 2270 TRD 2268 TRD 2267 TRD 142 TRD 2218TRD 2286 TRD 2247 TRD 2246 TRD 2285 TRD 2245 TRD 2281 TRD 2244 TRD 2243 TRD 2242 TRD 2241 TRD 2239TRD 2240 TRD 2238 TRD 2248 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 878 880 882 884 886 882 882 880 878 877 877 EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FLOODPLAIN FOREST LANDING CREEK ACCESS RELOCATE HYDRANT NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 60% SET05/13/18 Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N GR A D I N G P L A N LA Y O U T A N D SI T E AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-1.3 RSA JAL NORTH NORTH OF 54TH ST. ACCESS AND OVERLOOK, SEE 1/L-3.3 BOULDERS CREEK ACCESS SEE 7/L-3.5, SIMILAR EXISTING BENCH TO REMAIN 4' WIDE CRUSHED GRANITE PATH EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO REMAIN CANOE LANDING, SEE 7/L-3.5 8' WIDE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE TRAIL, BITUMINOUS REALIGNED CREEK SECTION WITH TRAIL AND WALL, SEE 2/L-3.5, SIMILAR NOTES AND LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXTENSION. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED MATCH LINE, SEE L-1.2 FLOODPLAIN FOREST TREES BIOFILTRATION SWALE TREES UPLAND FLOODPLAIN TREES AND NEAR LANDINGS FLOODPLAIN FOCAL TREES - TAMARACK FLOODPLAIN FOCAL TREES FLOODPLAIN FOREST SHRUBS - 8FT O.C. MOWED TURF - SODDED CUSTOM WETLAND MEADOW MIX WITH FORBS FLOODPLAIN FOCAL SHRUBS - 6FT O.C. UPLAND FLOODPLAIN SHRUBS AND NEAR LANDINGS - 5FT O.C. CREEK BANK SHRUBS - 3FT O.C., LIVE STAKE BIOFILTRATION SWALE NATIVE GRASS AND PERENNIAL PLANTS TRD 128 TRD 2089 TRD 2483 TRD 2090 TRD 2486 TRD 2091 TRC 2484 TRD 2092 TRC 2485 TRD 2498TRD 2488 TRC 2500 TRD 2094 TRC 2093 TRC 2096 TRC 2493 TRC 2492 TRD 2095TRC 2066 TRC 2487 TRC 2067 TRC 2480 TRD 2068 TRD 2482 TRD 2481 TRC 2070 TRD 2069 TRC 2071 TRC 2073 TRD 2081 TRD 2413 TRD 2469 TRD 2082 TRC 2489 TRD 2478 TRD 2412 TRD 2410 TRD 2433 TRD 2432 TRD 2060 TRC 2061 TRD 2062 TRC 2064 TRC 2065 TRC 2086 TRC 2088 TRD 2087 TRC 2083 TRD 2084 TRD 2455 TRC 2063 TRC 2467 TRD 2409 TRD 2423 TRD 2424 TRC 2443 TRD 2434 TRD 2422 TRD 136 TRD 134TRD 2447 TRD 2453 TRD 133 TRD 2454 TRD 129 TRD 131 TRD 132 TRD 2415 TRD 2057TRD 2056 TRD 2056 TRD 2058 TRD 2059 TRD 2420 TRD 2055 TRD 2436 TRD 265 TRD 2439 TRD 2456TRD 2459 TRD 2460 TRD 2435 TRD 2414TRD 689TRD 688 TRD 700 TRD 699 TRD 697 TRD 692 TRD 695 TRD 694 TRD 687 TRD 693 TRD 698 TRD 2519 TRD 2518 TRD 2517 TRD 2516 TRD 2515 TRD 2514 TRD 2513 TRD 2512 TRD 2512 TRD 2510 TRD 2509 TRD 2508 TRD 2507 TRD 2506 TRD 2505 TRD 2568TRD 2524 TRD 2566 TRD 2525 TRD 2567 TRD 2526 TRD 2527 TRD 2570 TRD 2528 TRD 2529 TRD 2532 TRD 2531TRD 2530TRD 2533 TRD 2557 TRD 2565 TRD 2560 TRD 2564 TRD 2556 TRD 2554 TRD 2546 TRD 2545TRD 2541 TRD 2540 TRD 2539 TRD 2538 TRD 2600 TRD 2537 TRD 2535 TRD 2581 TRD 2580 TRC 2534 TRD 2536TRD 2575 TRD 2576 TRD 2599 TRD 2583 TRD 2598 TRD 2597 TRD 2577 TRD 2578 TRD 2563 TRD 2562 TRD 2596TRD 2595 TRD 2594 TRD 2593 TRD 2592 TRD 2590TRD 2591 TRD 2588 TRD 2589 TRD 2587 TRD 2586 TRD 2558 TRD 2279 TRD 2585 TRD 2584 TRD 2579 TRD 2542 TRD 2559 TRD 2543 TRD 2547 TRD 2548 TRD 2549 TRD 2550 TRD 2551 TRD 2552 TRD 2553 TRD 2555 TRD 2544 TRD 2801 TRD 2802 TRD 2803 TRD 2804 TRD 2805 TRD 2806 TRD 2807 TRD 2808 TRD 2810 TRD 2811 TRD 2812 TRD 2813 TRD 2814 TRD 2815 TRD 2816 TRD 2817 TRD 2818 TRD 2819 TRD 2820 TRD 2821 TRD 2827 TRD 2826TRD 2824 TRD 2809 TRD 2876 TRD 2875 TRD 2900 TRD 2825 TRD 2823 TRD 2822 TRD 2828 TRD 2829 TRD 2830 TRD 2831 TRD 2832 TRD 2833TRD 2834 TRD 2835 TRD 2839 TRD 2840 TRD 2841 II II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II I I II I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I IIIIIIIIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II I I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II IIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIII I II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II II >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> LANDING BOARDWALK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN RENOVATED PARK LAWN RE-CONFIGURED ICE RINK EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FLOODPLAIN FOREST FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND LANDING RELOCATE UTILITY POLE NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 60% SET05/13/18 Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PL A N PL A N T I N G AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-2.1 RSA JAL . NORTH NOTES MATCH LINE, SEE L-2.2 LEGEND TRD 2069 TRC 2071 TRC 2073 TRC 2475 TRD 2072 TRC 2443 TRD 2434 TRD 2422 TRD 697 TRD 692 TRD 695 TRD 694 TRD 687 TRD 693 TRD 698 TRD 696 TRD 690 TRD 691 TRD 679 TRD 680 TRD 681 TRD 682 TRD 683TRD 684 TRD 685 TRD 2465 TRD 517 TRD 410 TRD 412 TRD 420 TRD 446 TRD 135 TRD 686 TRD 2425 TRD 2427 TRD 411 TRD 178 TRD 173 TRD 174 TRD 175 TRD 153 TRD 154 TRD 148 TRD 138 TRD 141 TRD 140TRD 139 TRD 2188 TRD 172 TRD 2187 TRD 2184 TRD 162 TRD 2267 TRD 142 TRD 2218TRD 2286 TRD 2247 TRD 2246 TRD 2285 TRD 2245 TRD 2281 TRD 2244 TRD 2243 TRD 2242 TRD 2241 TRD 2239TRD 2240 TRD 2238 TRD 2248 TRD 2249 TRD 2263TRD 2250 TRD 2251 TRD 2236 TRD 2237 TRD 2253 TRD 2252 TRD 2254 TRD 2255 TRD 2256 TRD 2257 TRD 2258 TRD 2278 TRD 2277 TRD 2259 TRD 2260 TRD 2261 TRD 2276 TRD 2275 TRD 2262 TRD 2282 TRD 2283 TRD 2272 TRD 2274TRD 2284 TRD 2273 TRD 2501 TRD 2503 TRD 2502 TRD 2520 TRD 2582 TRD 2521 TRD 2504 TRD 2561 TRD 2574TRD 2573 TRD 2572 TRD 2571 TRD 2522 TRD 2523 TRD 2569 TRD 2568TRD 2524 TRD 2566 TRD 2525 TRD 2567 TRD 2526 TRD 2527 TRD 2570 TRD 2528 TRD 2529 TRD 2532 TRD 2531TRD 2530TRD 2533 TRD 2557 TRD 2565 TRD 2560 TRD 2564 TRD 2545TRD 2541 II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II II IIIIIII II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II II IIIIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II IIIIIII II II II IIIII II II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II III II II II IIIII II II II IIIII II II II II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I II I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I IIII IIII I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I III I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I III IIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II I I I II I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I I IIII IIII IIIIIII IIII IIIIII I I II I I I I I II I I II I I I IIIIII II II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II IIIIIIIII II II II II X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XX X X X X X XXXXXXX X XXXXX XXXXXXX X XXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXXX X XXXXXXX XXXXX X XXXXXXX XXXXX X XXXXXXX XX XXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX XX XX X XX XXXXXX XX XXX X X XXX XXX X XXX X X X XX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 888 886 884 EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FLOODPLAIN FOREST FLOODPLAIN FOREST LANDING EXISTING HOCKEY RINK FLOODPLAIN FOREST TREES BIOFILTRATION SWALE TREES UPLAND FLOODPLAIN TREES AND NEAR LANDINGS FLOODPLAIN FOCAL TREES - TAMARACK FLOODPLAIN FOCAL TREES FLOODPLAIN FOREST SHRUBS - 8FT O.C. MOWED TURF - SODDED CUSTOM WETLAND MEADOW MIX WITH FORBS FLOODPLAIN FOCAL SHRUBS - 6FT O.C. UPLAND FLOODPLAIN SHRUBS AND NEAR LANDINGS - 5FT O.C. CREEK BANK SHRUBS - 3FT O.C., LIVE STAKE BIOFILTRATION SWALE NATIVE GRASS AND PERENNIAL PLANTS NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 05/13/18 60% SET Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PL A N PL A N T I N G AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-2.2 RSA JAL NORTH MATCH LINE, SEE L-2.3 LEGEND NOTES MATCH LINE, SEE L-2.1 TRD 153 TRD 154 TRD 148 TRD 138 TRD 141 TRD 140TRD 139 TRD 172 TRD 2187 TRD 2184 TRD 162 TRD 161 TRD 160 TRD 2100 TRD 159 TRD 158 TRD 2287 TRD 157 TRD 156 TRD 155 TRD 151TRD 2289 TRD 2297 TRD 2296 TRD 150 TRD 149 TRD 2290 TRD 2288 TRD 147 TRD 146 TRD 145 TRD 2202TRD 2291TRD 2294 TRD 143 TRD 2203 TRD 2204 TRD 2299 TRD 2300 TRC 2205 TRC 2207 TRD 2295 TRD 2208 TRD 2235 TRD 2293 TRD 2298 TRD 2292 TRD 2234 TRD 2233 TRD 2210 TRD 2212 TRD 2211 TRD 2213 TRD 2232 TRD 2231 TRD 2229 TRD 2228 TRD 2217 TRD 2221TRD 2220 TRD 2216 TRD 2222 TRD 2223 TRD 2264 TRD 2265 TRD 2226 TRD 2226 TRD 2225 TRD 2227 TRD 2269TRD 2270 TRD 2268 TRD 2267 TRD 142 TRD 2218TRD 2286 TRD 2247 TRD 2246 TRD 2285 TRD 2245 TRD 2281 TRD 2244 TRD 2243 TRD 2242 TRD 2241 TRD 2239TRD 2240 TRD 2238 TRD 2248 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EXISTING FOREST TO REMAIN FRESH MEADOW WETLAND FLOODPLAIN FOREST LANDING CREEK ACCESS RELOCATE HYDRANT FLOODPLAIN FOREST TREES BIOFILTRATION SWALE TREES UPLAND FLOODPLAIN TREES AND NEAR LANDINGS FLOODPLAIN FOCAL TREES - TAMARACK FLOODPLAIN FOCAL TREES FLOODPLAIN FOREST SHRUBS - 8FT O.C. MOWED TURF - SODDED CUSTOM WETLAND MEADOW MIX WITH FORBS FLOODPLAIN FOCAL SHRUBS - 6FT O.C. UPLAND FLOODPLAIN SHRUBS AND NEAR LANDINGS - 5FT O.C. CREEK BANK SHRUBS - 3FT O.C., LIVE STAKE BIOFILTRATION SWALE NATIVE GRASS AND PERENNIAL PLANTS NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 60% SET05/13/18 Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PL A N PL A N T I N G AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-2.3 RSA JAL NORTH LEGEND NOTES MATCH LINE, SEE L-2.2 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 4/23/18 60% SET Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N DE T A I L S AN D P L A N T I N G PL A N T L I S T AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-2.4 RSA JAL KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QUANT.SIZE UPLAND PLANTING ZONE A.CENTRAL PARK AND MINNEHAHA BLVD 1 TREES ACR ACER RUBRUM RED MAPLE 2" CAL. QUB QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 2"CAL. QUM QUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2"CAL. PID PICEA G. "DENSATA"BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 8 FT TALL TIR TILIA A. "REDMOND"REDMOND LINDEN 2"CAL. ULP ULMUS A. "PRINCETON"PRINCETON ELM 2"CAL. VIL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM #15 CONT. 2 SHRUBS/PERENNIALS DIL DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. HES HEMEROCALLIS SPECIES DAYLILY #1 CONT. RGL RHUS A. "GRO‐LO"GRO‐LO SUMAC #2 CONT. SYV SYRINGA VULGARIS COMMON PURPLE LILAC #2 CONT. B.MINNEHAHA BLVD SWALE 1 TREES ALH ALNUS H. "HARBIN"PRAIRIE HORIZON ALDER #20 CONT. AME AMELANCHIER SP SERVICEBERRY 8 FT. TALL POT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN #20 CONT. 2 SHRUBS/PERENNIALS ASI AESCLEPIAS INCARNATA MARSH MILKWEED #1 CONT. ASN ASTER NOVAE‐ANGLIAE NEW ENGLAND ASTER #1 CONT. CAR CAREX SP.SEDGES #1 CONT. CHL CHELONE "HOT LIPS"TURTLEHEAD #5 CONT. COS CORNUS SERICEA RED‐OSIER DOGWOOD #5 CONT. IRS IRIS VERSICOLOR BLUE FLAG IRIS #1 CONT. JUE JUNCUS EFFUSUS SOFT RUSH #1 CONT. SPH SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED C.RIPARIAN SWALE 1 TREES AME AMELANCHIER SP SERVICEBERRY 8 FT. TALL POT POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN #20 CONT. 2 SHRUBS/PERENNIALS CAR CAREX SP.SEDGES #1 CONT. CHL CHELONE "HOT LIPS"TURTLEHEAD #5 CONT. COS CORNUS SERICEA RED‐OSIER DOGWOOD #5 CONT. DIL DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. FER FERN SP.FERN VARIETIES #1 CONT. IRS IRIS VERSICOLOR BLUE FLAG IRIS #1 CONT. JUE JUNCUS EFFUSUS SOFT RUSH #1 CONT. D.PARK SHELTER TERRACE AND ADJACENT 1 TREES ACF ACER X FREMANII "JEFFERSRED"AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE #15 CONT. AME AMELANCHIER SP SERVICEBERRY 8 FT. TALL 2 SHRUBS/PERENNIALS AMR AMELANCHIER A. "REGENT"REGENT SERVICEBERRY #5 CONT. DIL DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. RGL RHUS A. "GRO‐LO"GRO‐LO SUMAC #2 CONT. IFI'S CUSTOM WETLAND MEADOW MIX (SEE FLOODPLAIN GRASSES AND FORBS) E.WEST PARK ‐ BROOKVIEW AVE 1 TREES AME AMELANCHIER SP SERVICEBERRY 8 FT. TALL CEL CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS HACKBERRY 2"CAL. QUB QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK 2"CAL. QUM QUERCUS MACROCARPA BUR OAK 2" CAL. QUR QUERCUS RUBRA RED OAK 5 8 FT TALL PID PICEA G. "DENSATA"BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 2"CAL. 2 SHRUBS/PERENNIALS COA CORNUS ALTERNIFOLIA PAGODA DOGWOOD #10 CONT. DIL DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. RHA RHUS AROMATICA FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT. RGL RHUS A. "GRO‐LO"GRO‐LO SUMAC #2 CONT. KEY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME QUANT.SIZE FLOODPLAIN PLANTING ZONE A.UPLAND FLOODPLAIN FOREST AREAS 1 TREES ACF ACER X FREMANII "JEFFERSRED"AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE #15 CONT. ACS ACER SACCHARINUM SILVER MAPLE #15 CONT. POS POPULUS D. "SIOUXLAND"SIOUXLAND POPLAR #20 CONT. VIL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM #15 CONT. 2 SHRUBS COS CORNUS SERICEA RED‐OSIER DOGWOOD #5 CONT. DIL DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. RHA RHUS AROMATICA FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT. RGL RHUS A. "GRO‐LO"GRO‐LO SUMAC #2 CONT. B.FOCAL VIEW AREAS 1 TREES AML AMELANCHIER LAEVIS ALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRY #10 CONT. LAL LARIX LARICINA TAMARACK 6 FT TALL PRA PRUNUS AMERICANA AMERICAN PLUM #10 CONT. SAC SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS AMERICAN ELDER #10 CONT. SAN SALIX NIGRA BLACK WILLOW #15 CONT. 2 SHRUBS/PERENNIALS EUM EUPATORIUM MACULATUM JOE PYE WEED #1 CONT. COS CORNUS SERICEA RED‐OSIER DOGWOOD #5 CONT. COR CORNUS RACEMOSA GRAY DOGWOOD #5 CONT. ILV ILEX VERTICILATA WINTERBERY #1 CONT. C.UPLAND AREAS NEAR LANDINGS 1 TREES AML AMELANCHIER LAEVIS ALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRY #10 CONT. POS POPULUS D. "SIOUXLAND"SIOUXLAND POPLAR #20 CONT. SAD SALIX DISCOLOR PUSSY WILLOW #10 CONT. VIL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM #10 CONT. 2 SHRUBS COR CORNUS RACEMOSA GRAY DOGWOOD #5 CONT. COS CORNUS SERICEA RED‐OSIER DOGWOOD #5 CONT. DIL DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT. RHA RHUS AROMATICA FRAGRANT SUMAC #5 CONT. RGL RHUS A. "GRO‐LO"GRO‐LO SUMAC #2 CONT. D.CREEK BANKS 1 SHRUBS/VINES AMF AMORPHA FRUTICOSA INDIGIO BUSH LIVE STAKE/ CEO CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS BUTTONBUSH LIVE STAKE/ COA CORNUS AMOMUM SILKY DOGWOOD #5 CONT. COR CORNUS RACEMOSA GRAY DOGWOOD LIVE STAKE/ COS CORNUS SERICEA RED‐OSIER DOGWOOD LIVE STAKE/ SAH SALIX H. VAR. "HUMILIS"PRAIRIE WILLOW LIVE STAKE/ VIR VITIS RIPARIA RIVERBANK GRAPE #1 CONT. AML AMELANCHIER LAEVIS ALLEGHENY SERVICEBERRY #10 CONT. VIT VIBURNUM TRILOBUM HIGHBUSH CRANBERRY #5 CONT. VIL VIBURNUM LENTAGO NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM #10 CONT. SAD SALIX DISCOLOR PUSSY WILLOW #10 CONT. FLOODPLAIN GRASSES AND FORBS A.IFI'S CUSTOM WET MEADOW SEED MIX Common Name Scientific Name % of Mix (% by wt) Big Bluestem Andropogon gerardii 6.25% Blue Joint Grass Calamagrostis canadensis 0.63% Virginia wild rye Elymus virginicus 25.00% Reed manna grass Glyceria grandis 3.75% Rice cut grass Leersia oryzoides 2.50% Switchgrass Panicum virgatum 3.13% Fowl bluegrass Poa palustris 15.00% Prairie Cord Grass Spartina pectinata 6.25% Total Grasses 62.50% Bebb's Oval Sedge Carex bebbii 1.88% Bottlebrush Sedge Carex comosa 1.88% Porcupine Sedge Carex hystricina 1.88% Fox Sedge Carex stipata 1.88% Brown Fox Sedge Carex vulpinoidea 2.50% Green Bulrush Scirpus atrovirens 0.63% Woolgrass Scirpus cyperinus 0.63% Softstem Bulrush Scirpus validus 1.25% Total Sedges and Rushes 12.53% Swamp Milkweed Asclepias incarnata 3.75% New England Aster Aster novae‐angliae 1.25% Nodding Bur Marigold Bidens cernua 1.63% Joe Pye Weed Eupatorium maculatum 0.63% Boneset Eupatorium perfoliatum 0.63% Sneezeweed Helenium autumnale 1.25% Great St. John's Wort Hypericum pyramidatum 0.38% Monkey flower Mimulus ringens 0.10% Wild Bergamot Monarda fistulosa 1.25% Mountain Mint Pycnanthemum virginianum 0.38% Yellow Coneflower Ratibida pinnata 3.00% Black‐eyed Susan Rudbeckia hirta 2.75% Brown‐eyed Susan Rudbeckia triloba 3.00% Blue Vervain Verbena hastata 3.00% Common Ironweed Vernonia fasciculata 2.00% Total Forbs 25.00% Totals: 100.00% B.HERBACEOUS FORB PLUGS TO SUPPLEMENT SEED MIX ASTER LUCIDULUS SWAMP ASTER ASTER PUNICEUS RED‐STEMMED ASTER AGASTACHE FOENICULUM GIANT HYSSOP EUPATORIUM MACULATUM JOE‐PYE‐WEED HELNIUM AUTUMNALE SNEEZEWEED IRIS VERSICOLOR BLUE FLAG IRIS LIATRIS LIGUALISTYLIS MEADOW BLAZINGSTAR SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA BROADLEAVED ARROWHEAD SCIRPUS FLUVIATILIS RIVER BULRUSH SCIRPUS VALIDUS SOFT‐STEM BULRUSH SILPHIUM PERFOLIATUM CUP PLANT SPARGANIUM CURYCARPUM GIANT BUR‐REED VERNONIA FASCICULATA IRONWEED VERBENA HASTATA BLUE VERVAIN STANDARD PLANTING DETAIL Scale: NTS1 STANDARD SLOPE DETAIL Scale: NTS2 STANDARD MULCH DETAIL Scale: NTS3 LIVE STAKE DETAIL Scale: NTS4 LANDSCAPE EDGER DETAIL Scale: NTS5 5/13/18 NORTH BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH BOTTOM OF CREEK 861.15 OHW 863.2 100YR 865.1 FINISH GRADE 50 FT SPAN TRAIL (12" CAMBER SHOWN) RETURN CONC. @90d TO MEET GRADE CONC. BRIDGE FOUNDATION ON HELICALS 3" WOOD DECK OVER 18" WEATHERING STEEL BEAM 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL, SEE DETAIL DRAWING APPROACH RAILING TO MATCH BRIDGE RAILING BOARDWALK ON HELICALS WITH 42" GUARDRAIL; SEE 4,5/L3.4 (OPEN)(OPEN)(OPEN)(FILL)866.2866.2 867.95 867.95 2:1 2.5:1 2:1 TOP OF 3 FT BANK TOP OF 3 FT BANK BOARDWALK ON HELICALS WITH 42" GUARDRAIL GUARDRAIL, POST, SEE DETAIL DRAWING RETURN CONC. @90d TO MEET GRADE CONC. BRIDGE FOUNDATION ON HELICALS CONC. BRIDGE FOUNDATION ON HELICALS 3"X8" WOOD DECK 18" WEATHERING STEEL BEAM BOTTOM OF CREEK 861.15 CR E E K B A N K C R E E K B A N K CONC. BRIDGE FNDN ON HELICALS 5' WIDE PERMEABLE CONCRETE PAVER TRAIL 3/4"X2" STL BAR TO SUPPORT TOP RAIL2X6 IPE WOOD HANDRAIL (NOTCH TO RECEIVE STL PLATES) 2"X2" STL TUBE 3/4" SOLID STL PICKET; 4" O.C. 2"X2" STL TUBE 2"X2" STL TUBE 4"X4" STL TUBE (W/BLOCKING) 2"X8" WOOD DECK W/OVERHANG WEATHERING STEEL BRIDGE BEAM ALL STEEL GUARDRAIL PARTS TO BE PAINTED PER MNDOT STD. FOR 3 COAT ZINC RICH PAINT SYSTEM (UPPER RAIL ON SOUTH BRIDGE ONLY) ALL STEEL TO BE HIGH STRENGTH NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 60% SET05/13/18 Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N EL E V A T I O N PL A N A N D NO R T H B R I D G E AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-3.1 RSA JAL NORTH NORTH BRIDGE ELEVATION NORTH BRIDGE PLAN BRIDGE GUARDRAIL ELEVATION (CREEK SIDE VIEW) SOUTH BRIDGE LOOKING NORTH BOTTOM OF CREEK 859.65 OHW 861.6 100YR 865.1 65 FT SPAN MAIN TRAIL MAIN TRAIL AND PAVILION PLAZA (15" CAMBER SHOWN) RETURN CONC. @90d TO MEET GRADE CONC. BRIDGE FOUNDATION ON HELICALS 3" WOOD DECK OVER 21" WEATHERING STEEL BEAM 42" HIGH GUARDRAIL, SEE DETAIL DRAWING APPROACH RAILING TO MATCH BRIDGE RAILING (FILL)(FILL) CONC. BRIDGE FOUNDATION ON HELICALS RAILING EXTENSION TO 54" AT SOUTH BRIDGE; SEE DETAIL DRAWING 866.6866.6 864.6864.6 GUARDRAIL, POST, SEE DETAIL DRAWING RETURN CONC. @90d TO MEET GRADE CONC. BRIDGE FOUNDATION ON HELICALS CONC. BRIDGE FOUNDATION ON HELICALS 3"X8" WOOD DECK 21" WEATHERING STEEL BEAM BOTTOM OF CREEK 859.65 CR E E K B A N K C R E E K B A N K 8' WIDE PERMEABLE CONCRETE PAVER TRAIL RETURN CONC. @90d TO MEET GRADE 8' WIDE BITUMINOUS TRAIL NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 05/13/18 60% SET Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N EL E V A T I O N PL A N A N D SO U T H B R I D G E AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-3.2 RSA JAL NORTHSOUTH BRIDGE ELEVATION SOUTH BRIDGE PLAN TRD 157 TRD 156 TRD 155 TRD 151TRD 2289 TRD 2297 TRD 2296 TRD 150 TRD 149 TRD 2290 TRD 2288 LANDING NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 05/13/18 60% SET Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N SE C T I O N S PL A N S A N D DE T A I L E D AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-3.3 RSA JAL . NORTH 2. NORTH BROOKVIEW AVE. STAIRS HAND RAIL SEE 3/L3.5 TYPICAL STAIR SECTION, SEE 4/L3.5 SECTION, SEE 4/L-3.6 5' WIDE CONCRETE WALK 1. NORTH OF 54TH ST CREEK ACCESS NORTH 5' WIDE BITUMINOUS WALK BITUMINOUS PAVING OR PERMEABLE CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (ALTERNATE) LANDING, SEE 7/L-3.5 4' WIDE CRUSHED GRANITE PATH 2.5:1 FILL SLOPE SECTION, SEE 6/L-3.5 >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 8'-0" CLEAR SLOPE 1 8"/FT. 6X6; CHAMFER AT ENDS 4X4X8'-7" 6X14 BOTTOM OF SWALE 12" DIA. CONCRETE FOOTING OR HELICALS. TYPE, SIZE AND SPACING TO BE DETERMINED BY STRUCTURALENGINEER TOP OF BANK BEYOND 2X6X24" SPACER, 4 EACH SIDE NOTES: 1.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY HARDWARE. ALL HARDWARE TO BE COUNTERSUNK 2.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWING 3.ALL LUMBER TO BE PRESSURE TREATED FIR-S4S WITH STAIN. COLOR TO BE SELECTED 4.ALL HARDWARE TO BE GALVANIZED 30 " M A X . 18'-0" 4'-0" 4X4 DECKING WITH 1 4" GAP BETWEEN 6X6 CURB, WITH 2X6 SPACERS BENEATH.ATTACH TO DECK W/LAG SCREWS, COUNTERSUNK 6X14X18' BEAM (ENGR. TO VERIFY) MOUNTING BRACKET BOTTOM OF SWALE SIDE SLOPE OF SWALE; 2:1 CONCRETE PATH CONCRETE PATH 2'-0"3'-4" (TYP. OF 4 SPACERS)(TYP. OF 3 OPENINGS)END DECK PIECE TO BE 4X8 (2 TOTAL) NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 05/13/18 60% SET Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N SE C T I O N S PL A N S A N D DE T A I L E D AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-3.4 RSA JAL . 1. PLAN AT 2. PLAN AT SWALE CROSSING - MAIN TRAIL SWALE CROSSING - SECONDARY TRAIL 3. SWALE CROSSING SECTION BIOFILTRATION SWALE BIOFILTRATION SWALE NORTH NORTH 4. TYPICAL BOARDWALK SECTION 5. TYPICAL WOOD BOARDWALK WITH GUARDRAIL ELEVATION 6. SWALE CROSSING ELEVATION FINISH GRADE WHERE DECK HEIGHT ABOVE FINISH GRADE EXCEEDS 30", INSTALL BOARDWALK GUARDRAIL IN LIEU OF CURB RAILS, SEE 5/L3.4 FOR ELEVATION, 130 LINEAR FEET TOTAL 3X8 DECK BOARDS 1X4 SCREWED TO EACH POST TO ANCHOR WIRE MESH CURB RAIL, 270 LINEAR FEET, TOTAL 4X4, CONTINOUS 2X4X24" SPACER AT 6'-0" ON CENTER BOLT THROUGH X2 6X BEAMS (3 TOTAL) CONCRETE COLUMN CAP ON CENTER SPACING TO BE DETERMINED 2X6 IPE WOOD TOP RAIL 4X4 WOOD POST HELICAL PILES,TO BE DETERMINED HEAVY DUTY WELDED WIRE MESH, BLACK FINISH, 2X2 OPENINGS 1X4 WOOD RAIL 2X6 IPE WOOD TOP RAIL 1X4 WOOD RAIL 3X8 WOOD DECK BOARDS FINISH GRADE 6X BEAM COLUMN CAP TO BEAM CONNECTOR 4X4 WOOD POST SEE 6/L3.4 FOR ELEVATION SET POSTS 8" DEEP IN CONC. FOOTING CENTER LINE OF POST, TYP. CENTER LINE OF POST, TYP. STAIR LANDING STAIR LANDING PROFILE OF STEPS BEYOND; 6" RISER X 18" TREAD SOIL GRADE ADJACENT TO STEPS SET RAILING 6" FROM SIDE OF STEPS 1-1/2" O.D. SCH 40 STEEL PIPE, ALL MEMBERS. HOT DIP GALVANIZED AND PAINTED PER MNDOT STANDARDS. . NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS 22"X34". DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. USE FIGURED DIMENSIONS ONLY, OR SEEK CLARIFICATION FROM ARCHITECT FOR MEASUREMENTS THAT ARE NOT INDICATED. ISSUEDATENO S C A L E : DATE/REVISIONS D R A W I N G N O : P R O J E C T # : D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W I N G T I T L E : © 2017 HART HOWERTON, LTD. PLANNERS, ARCHITECTS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 05/13/18 60% SET Ci t y o f E d i n a Ed i n a , M i n n e s o t a NO T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N AN D S E C T I O N S DE T A I L S LA N D S C A P E AS NOTED Mi n n e h a h a C r e e k W a t e r s h e d D i s t r i c t AR D E N P A R K 16-028 L-3.5 RSA JAL . 8' WIDE BITUMINOUS TRAIL MODULAR BLOCK WALL, SEE 3/L-3.5 2 MAX 1 1. SECTION AT MAIN TRAIL 6. TRAIL LANDING AT MINNEHAHA AVE 7. REINFORCED SLOPE AT CANOE LANDING 2. SECTION AT MAIN TRAIL 3. HANDRAIL AT STAIRS 4. STAIRS AT BROOKVIEW AVE 2 MAX 1 DRAIN ROCK DRAIN TILE COMPACTED AGGREGATE EPOXIED CAP UNIT ANCHOR, 6" 'BRISA' STYLE MODULAR BLOCK WALL, INSTALL PER MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS 8' WIDE BITUMINOUS TRAIL HANDRAIL, SEE 3/L-3.5 6X6X4' TREATED WOODTIMBER 2X6 TREATED WOOD RETURN CRUSHED ROCK 4 SOUTH LANDING 1 6X6 RECYCLED PLASTIC TIMBER, DARK BROWN COLOR. LENGTH VARIES, SEE PLANS. ANCHOR INTO GROUND 1" DIA. ROUNDED RIVER ROCK, TYPE AS PER INTERFLUVE. PROVIDE GEOFABRIC BENEATH CREEK BOTTOM 2.5 1 2% CITY SIDEWALK BITUMINOPUS PAVING OR PERMEABLE CONCRETE UNIT PAVER (ALTERNATE) MODULAR BLOCK WALL, SEE 2/L-3.5 6 MIDDLE LANDING 1 8 NORTH LANDING 1 DRAIN TILE 890 878 880 882 884 886 882 888 886 884 882 880 878 877 877 PARK SHELTERFFE 866.1 2 1 2 1 R a n d o l p h A v e , S u i t e 2 0 0 S t . P a u l , M N 5 5 1 0 5 ( 6 5 1 ) 2 4 3 - 9 7 0 0 w w w . i n t e r f l u v e . c o m DATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKEDAPPROVEDDRAWNDATEDESIGNED S H E E T ---5/9/2018 -18-04-01MINNEHAHA CREEK WAT E R S H E D D I S T R I C T EDINA, MINN E S O T A ARDEN PARK CREEK R E S T O R A T I O N D R A F T O V E R A L L S T O R M S E W E R A N D B M P P L A N C - 5 0 1 890888 P A R K S H E L T E R F F E 8 6 6 . 1 INV=862.45127 LF OF 6" D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 2 7 % W/ SOCK 5 9 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 5 8 % I N V = 8 6 2 . 1 1 5 4 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E 0 . 1 4 % N O N - P E R F O R A T E D I N V = 8 6 1 . 0 0 I N V = 8 6 2 . 3 0 1 3 5 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 2 0 % W / S O C K I N V = 8 6 2 . 0 0 2 9 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 2 0 % N O N - P E R F O R A T E D I N V = 8 6 1 . 9 4 1 3 5 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 2 0 % W / S O C K I N V = 8 6 1 . 6 7 8 2 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 2 0 % N O N - P E R F O R A T E D I N V = 8 6 1 . 5 1 1 3 2 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 2 0 % W / S O C K I N V = 8 6 1 . 2 5 4 0 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 2 5 % N O N - P E R F O R A T E D 6 8 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 1 5 % W / S O C K I N V = 8 6 1 . 0 0 S P L I T T E R - 8 N W I N V = 8 6 2 . 5 0 I N V E = 8 6 3 . 5 0 S I N V = 8 6 2 . 5 0 I N V W = 8 6 3 . 5 0 W E I R = 8 6 4 . 5 0 SPLITTER-6N INV=862.40SE INV=863.40SW INV=863.40W INV=862.40 O C S - 5 I N L E T = 8 6 3 . 2 0 S I N V = 8 6 2 . 4 0 F E S - 4 N I N V = 8 6 2 . 3 0 O C S - 4 I N L E T = 8 6 3 . 0 0 S W I N V = 8 6 2 . 0 0 F E S - 2 N E I N V = 8 6 1 . 9 0 FES-7NE INV=863.20 F E S - 6 N W I N V = 8 6 3 . 0 5 F E S - 5 N E I N V = 8 6 3 . 7 0 ( F I E L D V E R I F Y ) 2 2 L F O F 4 8 " R C P @ 0 . 1 8 % 1 2 8 L F O F 2 1 " R C P @ 0 . 2 7 % 94 LF OF 15" RCP @ 0.21% 6 9 L F O F 2 3 " X 3 6 " A R C H R C P @ 0 . 1 4 % ( T W O B A R R E L S ) 3 0 L F O F 2 3 " X 3 6 " A R C H R C P @ 0 . 3 3 % ( T W O B A R R E L S ) PRE-TREATMENT-7N INV=862.46S INV=862.46SUMP=859.00(MIN. 3' DEEP SUMP) 3 2 L F O F 4 8 " R C P @ 0 . 1 9 % SPLITTER-9RIM=866.78SE INV=862.8974 LF OF 24" RCP @ 0.53%83 LF OF 12" RCP @ 0.00%STMH-10RIM=867.79W INV=862.0370 LF OF 54" RCP @ 1.45%FES-8E INV=861.01OCS-11RIM=865.99SW INV=862.2546 LF OF 18"X29" ARCH RCP @ 0.55%FES-9NE INV=862.00 F E S - 3 I N V = 8 6 2 . 5 4 I N V = 8 6 1 . 1 5 I N V = 8 6 1 . 0 5 3 0 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 1 7 % N O N - P E R F O R A T E D C E L L 5 O V E R F L O W = 8 6 3 . 0 0 1 0 0 Y R H W L = 8 6 3 . 2 5 C E L L 4 O V E R F L O W = 8 6 3 . 0 0 1 0 0 Y R H W L = 8 6 4 . 4 8 C E L L 3 O V E R F L O W = 8 6 3 . 2 0 1 0 0 Y R H W L = 8 6 4 . 7 5 C E L L 2 O V E R F L O W = 8 6 4 . 5 0 1 0 0 Y R H W L = 8 6 4 . 9 9 INFILTRATION TRENCH TODRAIN VOLUME BETWEEN862.40 AND 863.40CELL 1OVERFLOW=864.00100 YR HWL=864.86 I N V = 8 6 2 . 4 5 3 2 L F O F 6 " D R A I N T I L E @ 0 . 1 4 % I N V = 8 6 2 . 1 5 INV=862.00 I N V = 8 6 2 . 0 8 19 LF OF 6" DRAINTILE @ 0.14%CONNECT TO EX.54" CMPCLEANOUT C L E A N O U T C L E A N O U T C L E A N O U T C L E A N O U T C L E A N O U T C L E A N O U T C L E A N O U T C O N N E C T T O E X . 1 2 " C M P C O N N E C T T O E X . 1 2 " C M P 2 1 2 1 R a n d o l p h A v e , S u i t e 2 0 0 S t . P a u l , M N 5 5 1 0 5 ( 6 5 1 ) 2 4 3 - 9 7 0 0 w w w . i n t e r f l u v e . c o m DATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKEDAPPROVEDDRAWNDATEDESIGNED S H E E T ---5/9/2018 -18-04-01MINNEHAHA CREEK WAT E R S H E D D I S T R I C T EDINA, MINN E S O T A ARDEN PARK CREEK R E S T O R A T I O N D R A F T S T O R M S E W E R A N D B M P P L A N N O R T H C - 5 0 2 BIORETENTION BASIN 3UNDERGROUND STORAGE CHAMBERSWITH FILTER MEDIA AND UNDERDRAIN.APPROXIMATELY 50'x25'x2'MINIMUM FINISHED GRADE EL.=865.33TOP OF STORAGE=863.75TOP OF MEDIA=861.75BOTTOM OF MEDIA=859.756" DRAINTILE INVERT OUT=859.75 6" DRAINTILE @ 0.50%SPLITTER-3RIM=870.00SE INV=864.5044 LF OF 18" RCP @ 5.00%STMH-2RIM=868.72NW INV=862.28SE INV=862.28 18 LF OF 18" RCP @ 3.02%22 LF OF 18" RCP @ 0.46%OCS-1RIM=863.86W INV=861.65SW INV=859.65E INV=859.65WEIR=863.50 1 3 L F O F 1 8 " R C P @ 1 . 1 9 % F E S - 1 W I N V = 8 5 9 . 5 0 2 1 2 1 R a n d o l p h A v e , S u i t e 2 0 0 S t . P a u l , M N 5 5 1 0 5 ( 6 5 1 ) 2 4 3 - 9 7 0 0 w w w . i n t e r f l u v e . c o m DATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKEDAPPROVEDDRAWNDATEDESIGNED S H E E T ---5/9/2018 -18-04-01MINNEHAHA CREEK WAT E R S H E D D I S T R I C T EDINA, MINN E S O T A ARDEN PARK CREEK R E S T O R A T I O N D R A F T S T O R M S E W E R A N D B M P P L A N S O U T H C - 5 0 3 2 1 2 1 R a n d o l p h A v e , S u i t e 2 0 0 S t . P a u l , M N 5 5 1 0 5 ( 6 5 1 ) 2 4 3 - 9 7 0 0 w w w . i n t e r f l u v e . c o m DATENO.REVISION DESCRIPTION PROJECT CHECKEDAPPROVEDDRAWNDATEDESIGNED S H E E T ---5/9/2018 -18-04-01MINNEHAHA CREEK WAT E R S H E D D I S T R I C T EDINA, MINN E S O T A ARDEN PARK CREEK R E S T O R A T I O N D R A F T D E T A I L S C - 8 0 1 Hennepin County Anoka County Dakota County Scott County Carver County Wright County Ramsey County Sherburne County Sibley County Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Project Area Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Project Area 52nd Street52ndStreet 53rd Street 54th Street Ju a n i t a A v e n u e In d i a n o l a A v e n u e Arden Avenue Ke l l o g g A v e n u e Oa k l a w n A v e n u e Br o o k v i e w A v e n u e Pa rk Place M i n n e h a h a B o u l e v a r d ¯0 250Feet Arden Park Tree Survey Map Ash Trees > 12 inch DBH Ash Trees < 12 inch DBH Ash Trees inoculatedProject Area Proposed Channel Unaffected Trees Trees removed for construction Notes:1. Proposed tree removals for construction based onpre-60% design plans and are subject to change asdesign develops2. Aerial imagery from MnGeo WMS service 2016color 7-county ¯ Notes:1. Depth to water table from Minnesota DNR. (2015).Water-TableElevation and Depth to Water Table, Minnesota Hydrogeology Atlasseries HG-03.2. Aerial imagery from MnGeo WMS service 2016 color 7-county 0 5,000Feet Arden Park Restoration Project Depth toGroundwater Project Area Depth to Water Table (ft) 0-10 >10-20 >20-30 >30-40 >40-50 >50 water 54th Street B r o o k v i e w A v e M i n n e h a h a B l v d Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, ±±0 200100 Feet 1 inch = 125 feet Arden Park: Delineated Wetland Boundary Legend Existing Wetland Boundary Existing Emergent Wetland Area Existing Channel Area Notes: -Existing wetland areas digitized from wetland types shownin MCWD's Wetland Delineation Report: Arden Park October 2016-Wetland area shown truncated to Arden Park general boundary- Remaining area within Wetland Boundary delineated as a Floodplain Forest Wetland Type Wellhead Protection Exhibit Legend Wells - Verified County Well Index (CWI) - Unverified Potential Contaminate Source Inventory (PCSI) Emergency Response Area Inner Wellhead Management Zone Vulnerability Classification High Vulnerability Moderate Vulnerability Low Vulnerability May 4, 2018 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 300 ft / Edina, Hennepin, MetroGIS | © WSB & Associates 2013, HN Aerial 2015, ©WSB & Associates 2013 Arden North Catchment Legend Control Valve Control Backflow Control Outlet Inlet Lift Station Pump Station Manhole Catch Basin Gate Valve Gate Valve Manhole Manhole Sump Treatment Structure Unknown Structure Sump Cleanout Sump Draintile Drain Tile Service Gravity Main Collector, Abandoned Collector, Active May 4, 2018 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 400 ft / Arden South Catchment Legend Control Valve Control Backflow Control Outlet Inlet Lift Station Pump Station Manhole Catch Basin Gate Valve Gate Valve Manhole Manhole Sump Treatment Structure Unknown Structure Sump Cleanout Sump Draintile Drain Tile Service Gravity Main Collector, Abandoned Collector, Active Pressurized Main Abandoned Active BMP May 4, 2018 Map Powered by DataLink from WSB & Associates 1 in = 100 ft / Arden Park Operations and Maintenance Plan May 2018 1 Arden Park Restoration Project Operations and Maintenance Plan May 2018 Insert Arden Park Aerial Image EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Edina and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District have partnered to improve the creek, habitat and the public use experience in Arden Park. A conceptual plan was developed based on public input received over a period of 12 months, and this plan is a balance of enhancements to the park that improve fish passage, wildlife habitat and water quality, while retaining the park’s natural character. Project elements included replacing the 4-foot dam at 54th Street with a rock rapids upstream, re- meandering the creek, and providing more access for fishing and other recreation. Project design based on the concept plan will progress throughout 2018 with opportunities for community engagement at key milestones throughout project development. To ensure that maintenance roles and responsibilities for Arden Park are clearly communicated between parties, this Operations and Maintenance (O&M) plan has been prepared as a cooperative effort by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the City of Edina. In fulfillment of the conditions of the Cooperative Agreement, and in furtherance of the mutual goals of the District and the City, the goals of this plan are to outline specific roles and responsibilities for the periodic and long-term maintenance of project elements associated with the Arden Park project. This O&M plan fulfills obligations proposed under the Cooperative Agreement dated January 17, 2018. It authorizes no acts contrary to the Cooperative Agreement, and in the case of ambiguity, the O&M plan Arden Park Operations and Maintenance Plan May 2018 2 should be interpreted consistent with the Cooperative Agreement. Any activities not consistent with the Cooperative Agreement and this O&M Plan must be agreed to, in writing, by both parties. All use will contribute to the rational management of the facilities as a whole. This O&M Plan is organized into the following sections: I. Introduction II. Project Elements Requiring Maintenance III. Site Boundaries and Posting Protected Areas IV. Law Enforcement and Site Protection and Safety V. Conclusion I. Introduction A Cooperative Agreement between Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and the City of Edina (Edina) was executed on January 17, 2018 (Attachment X) and describes roles and responsibilities related to the design and construction of the Arden Park Improvement Project. The Cooperative Agreement also states that the design phase of the project will include a maintenance plan that specifies inspection and maintenance terms for Stormwater Management improvements and native vegetation management. This O&M Plan aims to fulfill this purpose. According to the Cooperative Agreement, when the District engineer has certified completion and delivered record drawings to the City, ownership of all improvements will vest in the City. At this time, MCWD and Edina will record mutual covenants in which Edina will maintain the paths, trails, vegetation, and stormwater management improvements and MCWD will maintain the creek restoration improvements. On MCWD’s request, Edina will make reasonable arrangements for MCWD to access and occupy the park property for maintenance. The duration of the maintenance responsibilities will, at a minimum, meet applicable grant requirements. This O&M plan will provide a quick reference to specific maintenance needs, the frequency at which inspection and maintenance should occur, the responsible party, and any coordination that must occur to perform maintenance. All maintenance and other activities will be performed in a manner that reasonably minimizes impact to the surrounding natural environment and to any prior-constructed improvements. Each party is responsible for any damage it causes to the facilities owned by the other party due to maintenance and other activity. The regular safety inspections and associated maintenance of these facilities will be performed to reduce the risk of hazards. Further, the documentation of inspections and maintenance tasks is important to combat possible liability claims. Inspection records (Attachment X) should be completed during each inspection and follow-up maintenance should be documented. Arden Park Operations and Maintenance Plan May 2018 3 II. Project Elements Requiring Maintenance Table 1: Inspection, Operations, and Maintenance Tasks and Responsibilities for the Arden Park Restoration Project Table 1 specifies the facilities that require routine inspection and maintenance, potential issues with those facilities, frequency at which inspection and/or maintenance is to occur, and the party responsible for inspection and/or maintenance. The timing and inspection frequency for items listed below are based on a consideration of potential hazards, public use patterns, the benefits of early identification of maintenance and repair needs, and staff/contractor costs. The attached Site Plan (Attachment X) identifies location(s) of those facilities. Each responsible party will also respond to information and complaints received about site conditions involving the facility. Facility to be Maintained or Inspected Description Frequency Comments/Responsible Party Bituminous, concrete, or crushed rock paths, steppers, and pavers Freeze/thaw or tree roots cause trail materials to heave; Unstable slopes adjacent to paths cause erosion and trail failure Annually in spring Edina inspects and maintains Bridges and landings Inspection by Professional Engineer Every 2 years by PE; Annually by Staff Edina inspects and maintains Abutments connecting bridge to trail Frost and water cause path and abutment to become askew; Timbers can degrade over time Annually in spring Edina inspects and maintains Storm pipes under trail Trail settles on either side of storm pipe causing uneven trail Annually in spring Edina inspects and maintains Path: debris Leaves, sticks, dirt accumulate on trail and boardwalk Annually in spring Edina inspects and maintains with blower/sweeper Path: snow removal Snow and ice accumulate during the winter months November-March Edina inspects and maintains select trails; boardwalk is not maintained during winter months Boardwalk, landings, and stairs surface and structure Boardwalk, landing, and stair materials can warp and degrade over time Twice annually in spring and fall Edina inspects and maintains Inspect for bee/wasp nests Railings, boardwalk, and stairs may be a location for bee/wasp nests As needed Edina inspects and maintains Benches Materials can degrade over time; benches may be vandalized Twice annually in spring and fall Edina inspects and maintains Park shelter All components can degrade over time, may be vandalized, may require repair due to ordinary wear and tear As needed Edina inspects and maintains Arden Park Operations and Maintenance Plan May 2018 4 Maintenance or Inspection Activity Description Frequency Comments/Responsible Party Electrical utility and lighting maintenance Utilities may require repair due to regular use; replacement of lighting components will be required over time Twice annually in spring and fall Edina inspects and maintains Playground structure Structure may require repair due to ordinary use or vandalism As needed Edina inspects and maintains Stormwater filtration structure, outfall structure, storm sewer, fishing terrace with underground treatment Monitor for performance: if not performing as designed, determine cause; filter media will need replacement every X years Monitor X times annually after precipitation events; inspect filter media/outfall MCWD performs storm sampling; Edina inspects and maintains infrastructure as needed Bio-filtration swales Monitor for performance: if not performing as designed, determine cause; monitor vegetation condition Twice annually in spring and fall Edina inspects and maintains Removal of trees/limbs capable of falling Evaluation/ removal of unhealthy or dead trees and limbs Twice annually in spring and fall and after major storms Edina inspects and maintains Turf maintenance Mowing, weed treatment, fertilization, and adjustment of irrigation As needed throughout growing season Edina inspects and maintains Landscape vegetation management within the programmed park space [Indicated in red on Site Plan] Weed treatment (herbicide application or hand weeding), plant replacement, pruning Weed treatment 3 times during growing season at minimum; plant replacement and pruning once annually or as needed Edina inspects and maintains Landscape vegetation management within the woodland areas to the east of Brookview Avenue [Indicated in blue on Site Plan] Weed treatment (herbicide application or hand weeding), plant replacement, pruning Weed treatment 3 times during growing season at minimum; phased enhancement planting to improve understory vegetation MCWD inspects and maintains; Edina manages downed trees Streambank/floodplain vegetation management and erosion control prevention Weed treatment (herbicide application or hand weeding), plant replacement, pruning, application of erosion control practices Weed treatment during growing season; plant replacement, pruning and erosion control as needed MCWD inspects and maintains; Edina manages downed trees Arden Park Operations and Maintenance Plan May 2018 5 Facility to be Maintained or Inspected Description Frequency Comments/Responsible Party Hardwood mulch maintenance within mulched areas Replace shredded hardwood mulch Once annually in spring Edina inspects and maintains Wildlife control Wildlife abatement Annual evaluation by MCWD Addressed on as-needed basis Graffiti control Remove graffiti, re-paint surfaces As required Edina inspects and maintains Trash receptacles maintenance Removal of trash from receptacles Weekly Edina maintains Litter removal Trail side litter pickup; Parking area litter pickup Weekly or as required Edina maintains Interpretive signage Develop, locate, and maintain informational and interpretive signs Twice annually in spring and fall MCWD develops, installs, and maintains (City review and permitting as required) Wayfinding/directional signage Develop, locate, and maintain wayfinding and directional signs Twice annually in spring and fall Edina develops, installs, and maintains (City review and permitting as required) III. Site Boundaries and Key Areas of Inspection and Maintenance Attachment X, Site Plan, details the site boundaries of the project area subject to this Operations and Maintenance Plan and key areas of inspection and maintenance identified in Table 1. IV. Site Protection and Safety The park is open from X time to X time. Any party will not authorize public motorized use of the park paths, however, each party may cross the facilities owned by the other party and may operate motorized equipment to perform its roles and responsibilities. MCWD will coordinate with the City of Edina to designate location names for various areas of Arden Park to aid emergency personnel in locating park users in need of assistance. Trimming of vegetation will be completed to maintain adequate sight distance for crime prevention purposes. The City of Edina and MCWD will work in coordination to identify areas that require open sight lines, and the City and MCWD will complete necessary pruning and trimming within their respective areas of management. The City of Edina regulates the removal of graffiti by City ordinance (City Code Section ___) and the owner of the property must remove the graffiti at their expense V. Communication and Coordination Arden Park Operations and Maintenance Plan May 2018 6 VI. Conclusion The City of Edina and MCWD accept perpetual maintenance responsibility for the project elements detailed within this Operations and Maintenance Plan and will work to coordinate specific maintenance tasks determined to be necessary. Both parties will work in a good faith effort toward the rational management of the facilities as a whole. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Operations & Maintenance Plan by their authorized officers. CITY OF EDINA By__________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Its City Manager MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By _________________________________________________ Date: ____________________________ Its Administrator Approved for form and execution: ___________________________________________________ MCWD Counsel Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I I.B. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk Item Activity: Subject:R es olution No. 2018-43: Acc epting Various G rants & Donations Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion adopting R esolution No. 2018-43. I N TR O D U C TI O N: I n order to comply with S tate S tatutes, all donations to the C ity must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the C ouncil accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Resolution No. 2018-43 Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2018-43 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Fire Department: Eagle Scout Service Project $690.00 Service Project to build compost & garden boxes at Fire Station One Parks & Recreation Braemar Golf Course Memorial Fund: Richard Brozic $100.00 Memorial Fund Dated: May 15, 2018 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: I X.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: F rom:S haron Allis on, Executive As s is tant Item Activity: Subject:C orres pondence Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T here are no correspondences since the last City Council meeting. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: I X.B. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: F rom:S haron Allis on, Executive As s is tant Item Activity: Subject:C orres pondence Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T here are no correspondences since the last City Council meeting. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: C .1. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: Minutes F rom:Ann Kattreh, P arks & R ecreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : P arks & R ec reation C ommission April 10, 2018 Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Minutes : Parks & Recreation Commission April 10, 2018 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/8/2018 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Edina Parks & Recreation Commission City Hall, Council Chambers Tuesday, April 10, 2018 7 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Good called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners McCormick, Dahlien, Good, Ites, Strother, Nelson and Student Members Schieffert and Kiely. Commissioner Miller arrived at 7:02 p.m. Commissioner Willette arrived at 7:08 p.m. Absent were Commissioners McAwley and Burke Staff present: Staff Liaison Ann Kattreh, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Susan Faus, Administrative Coordinator Janet Canton, Assistant Director – Parks & Natural Resources Tom Swenson and City Forester Luther Overholt III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Nelson to approve the meeting agenda. Motion seconded by Strother. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Dahlien to approve the March 13, 2018 minutes. Motion seconded by Nelson. Motion carried. V. Special Recognitions and Presentations Staff Liaison Kattreh introduced the new Assistant Director - Parks & Natural Resources Tom Swenson. Assistant Director – Parks & Natural Resources Swenson took a few minutes to introduce himself to the commission. VI. Community Comment Geoff Workinger, 5224 Kellogg Ave., shared his concerns on the importance of doing the Arden Park Project with sensitivity while maintaining and improving the natural beauty of the park. Frank Lorenz, 7151 York Ave. S., Unit 720, shared his concerns about the ash trees. He would like the city to look into a firm called “Woods from the Hood” who pay for trees that have been cut down in the metro area and make it into dimensional lumber and furniture. This will help the city save some money. VII. Reports/Recommendations A. Memory Garden Renovation Design Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/8/2018 Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus informed the commission that the Edina Garden Council has been planning for the redesign of the Memory Garden at Arneson Acres Park for several years now and have been actively fundraising to finance the entire project. The project will be completed in different phases as money is raised; the anticipated cost for the entire project is $60,000. City staff has been involved in the design and fully support the project. Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Faus introduced Tony Siebenaler-Ransom of Tsuke Studio, who gave a brief presentation on the project and process and provided information to the commission on the overall design. She also introduced the Co-Chairs of the Memory Garden Committee: Liz Genovese and Karen Platt. Liz Genovese and Karen Platt spoke about the Garden Council and the process of how they got to where they currently are. It was also noted that the project has been re-named the Tranquility Garden through suggestions from members and by a final vote. Commissioners asked questions and had discussions. Chair Good and Staff Liaison Kattreh thanked the Garden Council for all of their hard work. B. Arden Park Ash Trees Staff Liaison Kattreh gave a brief presentation on the ash trees at Arden Park. The Parks & Recreation Commission was asked at last week’s work session with the City Council to consider making a recommendation to the City Council on the ash trees at Arden Park. She also introduced City Forester, Luther Overholt, who can answer any questions the commission may have. Staff Liaison Kattreh noted, tomorrow, April 11 the working group will be meeting for the first time regarding the new shelter building at Arden Park. The working group consists of eight residents, as well as commissioners Nelson, Strother, McAwley and Ites in addition to staff and the consulting team. Staff Liaison Kattreh gave two suggestions for a recommendation for the commission to consider or come up with a completely different recommendation. The following are the two suggested recommendations: 1) Does the Parks & Recreation Commission support the removal of at least 50 of the 77 ash trees in the park project area? Twenty-four of the 50 are part of the creek construction. This would remove approximately 94 total trees in the park. These trees would be replaced at a minimum of one to one with high value trees. This is 21 percent of the tree cover in the project area. OR Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/8/2018 2) Does the Parks & Recreation Commission support the removal of all 77 ash trees in the park project area? Twenty-four of the 77 are part of the creek construction. This would remove approximately 121 total trees in the park. These trees would be replaced at a minimum of one to one with high value trees. This is 26 percent of the tree cover in the project area. The commissioners asked City Forester Overholt a lot of questions regarding the ash trees and Emerald Ash Borer Disease. Commissioners gave their views, comments and suggestions. Motion made by Nelson to remove all 77 ash trees in the Arden Park Project area to be replaced with the one for one replacement with the largest size possible to fit park design and budget. Motion seconded by Willette. Motion Carried. It was also stressed by the Parks & Recreation Commission that a communication plan will need to be a big part of this project and should be started now. Chair Good thanked Forester Overholt for his input and advice. C. Braemar Park Master Plan Review Staff Liaison Kattreh indicated that in January the City Council asked the Parks & Recreation Commission to prioritize the projects for the Braemar Park Master Plan, put a budget to that prioritization and report back to the City Council. She asked the commissioners to provide any recommendations to the committee for their consideration in the prioritization of the project. Chair Good asked each commissioner for any reaction or input they may have about prioritization before they begin work as a smaller committee. Staff Liaison Kattreh thanked the commissioners for all of their feedback. D. Comprehensive Plan Update Chair Good went over the fifth iteration of the Comprehensive Plan and pointed out the changes and input he received since last month’s meeting. He also pointed out the input he received from a couple of other commissions. Commissioners asked questions and gave input. Chair Good asked the commissioners if they have any other input or are there any items they should be addressing that may be missing from the fifth iteration. He indicated the plan will go in front of the Planning Commission tomorrow, April 11. Chair Good thanked the commissioners for all of their input and insights. VIII. Chair and Member Comments • Commissioner Ites informed the commission that at the recent Braemar Golf Association meeting he attended he was informed the Driving Range Academy was up 40% in revenue Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/8/2018 and the golf dome was up 9% in revenue. He thanked the Parks & Recreation staff for all of their hard work in making this possible despite not having a golf course open. • Commissioner McCormick thanked Chair Good for all the hard work he has done on the Comprehensive Plan; this is a huge project and he has put a lot of time into it to which they have ended up in a really good place. • Commissioner Nelson asked what the approved Access Agreement is for at Sherwood Park. Staff Liaison Kattreh replied there is a siding project that is happening with the condo units immediately adjacent to the park. The construction company doing the work has requested access along the edge of Sherwood Park so they are able to get access for their materials and scaffolding. • Chair Good gave Commissioner McCormick thank you cards as a way to say thank you to her for all of the hard work she has done and also for helping to prepare him for his role as Chair. IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Kattreh gave the following updates: • The Golf Dome had their busiest week in the history of the dome last week with 3,400 customers who hit over 270,000 golf balls. • The Third Annual Bunny Breakfast was held on Saturday, March 24 at Braemar Golf Course; there were over 150 kids in attendance. • The Princess Ball event will take place at Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse on April 20 and the Superhero Saturday event will take place on Saturday, April 28 at the Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse. • Work has started on the restoration of the main slides at the Edina Aquatic Center; both the inside and outside of the slides are being resurfaced. • Edinborough Park had an incredibly busy March; their attendance as up 10% ahead of last year with a total of 20,274 paid daily admissions. The concession revenue was also up 10%. • The Parks & Recreation Department is currently in major hiring mode; the department hires over 600 part-time and seasonal employees annually. X. Adjournment Motion made by Willette to adjourn the April 10, 2018 meeting at 9:41 p.m. Motion seconded by Miller. Motion carried. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: D.1. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: Advisory C ommunic ation F rom:Ann Kattreh, P arks & R ecreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Advisory C ommunic ation: P arks & R ec reation C ommis s ion-Additional Work P lan Item - Explore Alternative F unding Model(s) Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: We are requesting the addition of a previously requested P arks & Recreation C ommission Work P lan item, namely exploring creative options to supplement city funding of park plans. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he P arks & Recreation Director supports this recommendation by the P arks & R ecreation Commission. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Advis ory Communication: Additional Work Plan Item - Explore Alternative Funding Model(s) Date: May 15, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Parks & Recreation Commission Subject: Additional Work Plan Item – Explore Alternative Funding Model(s) Action Requested: We are requesting the addition of a previously requested Parks & Recreation Commission Work Plan item, namely exploring creative options to supplement city funding of park plans. Situation: The Parks & Recreation Commission would like to study long term funding options for the Parks & Recreation Department that would supplement the city’s budgeting and CIP process; for example – Professional fundraising, endowment fund, friends of the parks, corporate branding, etc. Background: The initiative was included in the original Work Plan recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Commission. It was excluded due to other priorities that the council had for the final plan. Since the 2018 Work Plan was approved, activity on Weber Woods has been delayed and it appears unlikely that this initiative will get any action this year. Assessment: Due to the delay in Weber Woods, we have an opportunity to revisit other initiatives of importance for the Parks & Recreation Department. It is clear from work efforts the previous few years (Edina Parks & Recreation Strategic Plan, Fred Richards Master Plan, Braemar Master Plan, Arden park redesign, etc.) that we have many strong initiatives that will require future funding. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Parks & Recreation Commission that we reinstate a 2018 work initiative to investigate possible alternative funding options to support future growth and development of Edina’s parks, programs and green spaces. Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: XI I.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: O ther F rom:Lis a A. S chaefer, As s is tant C ity Manager Item Activity: Subject:2018 Q 1 Q uarterly Busines s R eport Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. I N TR O D U C TI O N: Attached are the Quarterly B usiness Reports for Q 1 2018. T he reports include: 1. Q uarterly Financial Report from the Finance D epartment 2. E dina Liquor S corecard 3. Q uarterly U pdate for 2018-19 B udget Work P lan AT TAC HME N T S: Description Quarterly Financial Report Edina Liquor Scorecard Quarterly Update CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 1 GENERAL FUND Revenues: General Fund revenues total $4.8M through March 31st which represent 12% of total budgeted revenues compared to 12% in 2017. Property taxes are the primary revenue source and represent 69% of the City’s budgeted revenue. Property taxes are received in June and December. Franchise fees are received quarterly, generally the month after quarter close. First quarter 2018 revenues are up $274k versus prior year mostly due to the following increases:  $79k in Licenses and Permits  $24k in Intergovernmental  $37k in Fire Charges for Services  $49k in Parks & Recreation Charges for Services  $84k in investment income The increase in Licenses and Permits is driven by an increase in the number of building and mechanical permits. Increase in Intergovernmental is due to receipt of the State of Minnesota grant in January this year versus May of 2017. Charges for Services are up in Fire due to an increase in SAC charges. Charges for Services are up in Parks & Recreation due to increased registration for the Minihawk program. Investment income is up year over year due to the increase in short term interest rates. Expenditures: General Fund expenditures total $9.3M through March 31st which represent 23% of total budgeted expenditures compared to 23% in 2017. General Fund departments include Administration, Communications and Technology Services, Human Resources, Finance, Public Works, Public Safety, Parks and Recreation and Community Development. Generally, City expenditures are consistently distributed throughout the year, meaning that in most years, the City uses about 25% of the budget every quarter. The departments are largely aligned with the consistent expenditure distribution and comparable to first quarter of the prior year (e.g., Parks & Recreation is at 20% this year versus 21% in the prior year). Human Resources is running at a slightly higher percentage due to severance. Severance expenditures for all General Fund employees, including those employees who work in other functions are included in Human Services. This spending category can be influenced significantly by just a few retirements of long-tenured employees. Severance expenditures have increased $114k over the first quarter of 2017. In years when severance expenditures are higher than budgeted, the excess is paid for by assigned fund balance (reserves) that we hold in the general fund for this purpose. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 2 Full Year Budget 2018 Mar YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget Used Mar YTD Actual 2017 Fav/ (Unfav) Revenues: Property Taxes 28,493,077 - 0%- - Franchise Fees 870,500 - 0%- - Lodging Tax 22,000 4,224 19%2,975 1,249 Licenses and Permits 4,351,930 2,809,815 65%2,731,057 78,758 Intergovernmental 1,308,977 220,200 17%195,936 24,264 Charges for Services 4,592,004 957,266 21%860,195 97,071 Fines and Forfeitures 900,000 149,897 17%151,513 (1,616) Investment Income 120,000 318,953 266%235,388 83,566 Other Revenues 8,000 17,488 219%46,381 (28,894) Rental of Property 449,550 272,032 61%252,376 19,657 Transfers In 50,000 - 0%- - Total Revenues 41,166,038 4,749,877 12%4,475,822 274,055 Expenditures: Administration (2,100,761) (531,737) 25%(472,116) (59,621) Communicaiton & Technology (1,268,558) (257,497) 20%(277,192) 19,695 Human Resources (862,435) (378,335) 44%(251,073) (127,262) Finance (1,048,449) (224,477) 21%(191,319) (33,158) Public Works (6,435,698) (1,358,801) 21%(1,239,820) (118,980) Engineering (1,789,862) (356,097) 20%(350,741) (5,356) Police (12,243,160) (2,829,682) 23%(2,864,117) 34,435 Fire (8,226,139) (1,871,376) 23%(1,797,190) (74,186) Parks & Recreation (5,393,882) (1,088,867) 20%(1,011,451) (77,416) Community Development (1,797,094) (436,552) 24%(409,946) (26,606) Total Expenditures (41,166,038) (9,333,421) 23%(8,864,964) (468,456) Revenues over/ (under) expenditures - (4,583,544) (4,389,142) (194,402) General Fund Revenues and Expenditures - Budget and Actual As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 3 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Aquatic Center Revenues: Aquatic Center revenues total $94k for the first quarter of 2018 compared to $31k in prior year and consist of early season pass sales. Increase over prior year is due to an email reminder of early bird purchasing and an increase in the rate. The Aquatic Center’s season runs from the beginning of June through late August. Expenses: Aquatic Center expenses are slightly ahead of prior year due to an increase in depreciation expense. Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4414 - MISC RETAIL SALES 7,000 - 0%30 (30) 4521 - CONCESSION SALES 135,000 - 0%45 (45) 4532 - SEASON TICKETS 435,000 94,552 22%30,785 63,767 4317 - ADVERTISING SALES 250 - 0%284 (284) 4541 - GENERAL ADMISSIONS 405,000 - 0%- - 4602 - LESSONS 400 - 0%- - 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - - -0 (0) 4551 - BUILDING RENTAL 47,000 - 0%- - 4557 - BIRTHDAY RENTAL 5,000 - 0%- - TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 1,034,650 94,552 9%31,144 63,408 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (42,000) - 0%(2,388) 2,388 6001:6099 - Personal Services (375,996) (3,522) 1%913 (4,435) 6101:6299 - Contractual Services (176,200) (7,379) 4%(10,187) 2,808 6401:6699 - Commodities (109,600) (1,660) 2%(4,927) 3,267 6801:6899 - Central Services (35,316) (8,829) 25%(9,599) 770 6901:6999 - Depreciation (306,500) (85,911) 28%(69,462) (16,449) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (1,045,612) (107,301) 10%(95,649) (11,652) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(10,962) (12,749) 116%(64,505) 51,756 Aquatic Center Revenues and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 4 Art Center Revenues: Art Center revenues total $167k through March 31st which represent 33% of total budgeted revenue. Class Registrations account for about 77% of total budgeted revenues at the Art Center. The first quarter is showing an increase of $17k or 14% in class registrations year over year attributed to new class listings on the website. Expenses: Art Center expenses total $170k through March 31st which represent 24% of total budgeted expenses. Unfavorability in commodities compared to the first quarter of last year is attributed to timing of purchases. Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4413 - ART WORK SOLD 13,000 3,046 23%3,156 (111) 4414 - MISC RETAIL SALES 28,000 6,245 22%6,576 (331) 4521 - CONCESSION SALES 350 99 28%80 19 4531 - MEMBERSHIPS 18,000 4,458 25%3,607 852 4607 - CLASS REGISTRATION 388,000 137,016 35%120,283 16,733 4608 - FIRING FEES 40,000 10,025 25%9,909 117 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - 17 -(8) 25 4610 - MEDIA STUDIO FEES - - -- - 4614 - POTTERY FEES 17,000 6,206 37%4,354 1,852 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 504,350 167,112 33%147,956 19,155 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (500) - 0%(92) 92 6000:6099 - Personal Services (475,576) (112,710) 24%(110,350) (2,360) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (112,300) (22,066) 20%(17,537) (4,529) 6400:6699 - Commodities (61,700) (21,126) 34%(13,692) (7,433) 6700:6799 - Capital Outlay - - -- - 6800:6899 - Central Services (42,276) (10,569) 25%(11,461) 892 6901:6999 - Depreciation (14,000) (3,501) 25%(6,000) 2,499 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (706,352) (169,972) 24%(159,132) (10,840) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(202,002) (2,860) 1%(11,176) 8,316 Art Center Revenues and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 5 Braemar Arena Revenues: Braemar Arena revenues total $348k through the first quarter of 2018 which represent 15% of budgeted revenue (compared to 17% in prior year). Ice Rental revenue is 67% of total budgeted revenue. Ice Rental is down year over year due to the automatic reversal of year end accruals in January. Building rental fluctuations are based on timing of lease payments. Spectator Fees represent the Arena’s share of high school game admissions which are collected and tracked by the high school. Twice per year, the high school pays the Arena 50% of the gate. November/December gate is paid in January, and January through March gate is paid in April. Expenses: Braemar Arena operating expenses total $685k through March 31st compared to $668k in 2017. Adjusting for depreciation (not yet allocated for 2018), prior year operating expenses, less depreciation, are $504k, which is comparable to current year. Differences in individual line items are due to more accurate invoice coding. Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/(Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4414 - MISC RETAIL SALES 1,000 90 9%10 80 4317 - ADVERTISING SALES 45,000 14,490 32%4,937 9,553 4607 - CLASS REGISTRATION 135,000 15,574 12%16,396 (822) 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT (61) 253 (315) 4611 - SKATE SHARPENING - 106 - 106 4415 - VENDING SALES 3,000 2,450 82%3,642 (1,192) 4521 - CONCESSION SALES 295,200 90,756 31%89,300 1,456 4532 - SEASON TICKETS - - - - 4542 - SPECTATOR FEES 40,000 13,322 33%16,959 (3,637) 4544 - DAILY SKATING FEES 25,000 15,546 62%10,412 5,134 4551 - BUILDING RENTAL 200,300 42,407 21%66,316 (23,909) 4556 - ICE RENTAL 1,545,000 150,133 10%167,398 (17,265) 4558 - OTHER RENTAL - - - 4581 - SKATE RENTAL 4,000 3,018 75%1,884 1,134 4584 - LOCKER RENTAL - - - - TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 2,293,500 347,829 15%377,507 (29,677) OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (125,250) (44,004) 35%(25,808) (18,197) 6000:6099 - Personal Services (1,049,920) (277,605) 26%(262,321) (15,283) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (793,600) (152,336) 19%(183,582) 31,246 6400:6699 - Commodities (122,750) (23,044) 19%(14,312) (8,732) 6800:6899 - Central Services (95,508) (23,877) 25%(18,797) (5,080) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (655,000) (163,749) 25%(163,509) (240) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (2,842,028) (684,616) 24%(668,330) (16,286) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(548,528) (336,786) 61%(290,823) (45,963) Arena Revenues and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 6 Centennial Lakes Revenues: Centennial Lakes revenues total $242k through March 31st compared to $114k in the prior year. Revenues such as Concessions, General Admissions, Skate Rental, Equipment Rental and Green Fees are dependent upon appropriate seasonal weather. Skate Rental and Equipment Rental items are up over prior year due to the extended winter this year. The increase in activity also drives an increase in Concessions. Increase in Association Fee is due to a one-time payment for past due park maintenance fees of $75k. Expenses: Centennial Lakes expenses total $204k through March 31st compared to $209k in the prior year. The increase in Personal Services is due to staffing the longer season which is partially offset by a decrease in Contractual Services. First quarter of prior year Contractual Services included the floor resurfacing project. Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4524 - CONCESSIONS - CENTENNIAL 30,000 10,884 36%8,353 2,531 4541 - GENERAL ADMISSIONS - - -(5) 5 4555 - CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK 110,000 6,814 6%8,033 (1,220) 4558 - OTHER RENTAL 7,000 - 0%- - 4581 - SKATE RENTAL 60,000 47,962 80%36,128 11,834 4583 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL 90,000 6,238 7%- 6,238 4593 - GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE 210,000 - 0%- - 4604 - SPONSORSHIP INCOME - - -72 (72) 4606 - ASSOCIATION FEE 305,000 170,046 56%60,720 109,326 4607 - CLASS REGISTRATION - 420 -300 120 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - (6) -(10) 5 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 812,000 242,358 30%113,591 128,767 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (13,000) (3,620) 28%(1,035) (2,585) 6000:6099 - Personal Services (664,114) (141,772) 21%(131,141) (10,631) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (190,300) (19,617) 10%(31,092) 11,476 6400:6699 - Commodities (138,800) (12,798) 9%(16,481) 3,683 6800:6899 - Central Services (72,516) (18,129) 25%(18,483) 354 6901:6999 - Depreciation (42,500) (7,920) 19%(10,626) 2,706 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (1,121,230) (203,855) 18%(208,858) 5,003 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(309,230) 38,503 (12)%(95,267) 133,769 Centennial Lakes Revenues and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 7 Edinborough Park Revenues: Edinborough Park revenues total $496k through March 31st which represent 36% of total budgeted revenues. Overall revenue is comparable to prior year. Season Tickets, General Admissions and Birthday Rental are down slightly versus prior year. Increase in Other Rental is offset by decrease in Edinborough Park line item due to separating pool revenue for increased visibility. Increase in Association Fees is due to timing of payments and a one-time payment of past due fees for $2,500. Expenses: Edinborough Park expenses total $388k through the first quarter compared to $372k in the prior year. The overall increase $16k is attributable to an increase in Cost of Goods Sold which is due to the timing of purchases. Favorability in Contractual Services is driven by energy savings. Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4521 - CONCESSION SALES - 398 -456 (59) 4523 - CONCESSIONS - EDINBOROUGH 135,000 53,094 39%53,028 66 4532 - SEASON TICKETS 130,000 38,630 30%45,189 (6,559) 4541 - GENERAL ADMISSIONS 620,000 248,648 40%254,613 (5,965) 4557 - BIRTHDAY RENTAL 194,000 60,796 31%70,400 (9,604) 4558 - OTHER RENTAL 58,000 25,216 43%- 25,216 4584 - LOCKER RENTAL 1,500 914 61%- 914 4585 - SOCK RENTAL 10,000 1,450 15%1,238 212 4554 - EDINBOROUGH PARK 14,000 825 6%22,811 (21,986) 4605 - LESSON PROGRAM INCOME 3,000 218 7%1,034 (816) 4606 - ASSOCIATION FEE 224,000 66,281 30%46,726 19,556 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - 28 -(10) 38 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 1,389,500 496,496 36%495,484 1,012 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (80,000) (31,245) 39%(17,326) (13,920) 6000:6099 - Personal Services (804,918) (187,722) 23%(182,201) (5,521) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (354,300) (77,808) 22%(78,077) 269 6400:6699 - Commodities (178,950) (24,284) 14%(27,078) 2,794 6800:6899 - Central Services (79,092) (19,773) 25%(21,483) 1,710 6901:6999 - Depreciation (183,250) (47,265) 26%(45,441) (1,824) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (1,680,510) (388,097) 23%(371,606) (16,491) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(291,010) 108,400 (37)%123,879 (15,479) Edinborough Park Revenues and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 8 Braemar Golf Course Revenues: Golf Course revenues total $406k through March 31, 2018 compared to $387k a year ago. Overall revenues reflect the closure of the regulation course. Increase over prior year is due to favorable Golf Dome Receipts caused by a late spring arrival. Increase is Golf Dome Receipts is partially offset by a decrease in the Driving Range year over year. Expenses: Golf Course operating expenses total $555k through March 31st compared to $603k in the prior year. Primary driver of the decrease in Operating Expense is the decrease in Depreciation. Also of note, is that in prior years Pro Shop inventory purchases were expensed to Cost of Goods Sold when purchased. Beginning January 1, 2018, Cost of Goods Sold reflect the cost of the item at time of sale to better match revenues with expenses. Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/(Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4406 - SALES BEER - 3,908 - 3,908 4412 - PRO SHOP SALES 90,000 23,763 26%20,342 3,421 4414 - MISC RETAIL SALES - - - - 4521 - CONCESSION SALES 1,500 2,445 163%93 2,352 4531 - MEMBERSHIPS 22,000 4,832 22%5,700 (868) 4543 - GOLF DOME RECEIPTS 350,000 285,254 82%261,732 23,523 4551 - BUILDING RENTAL 4,000 2,348 59%- 2,348 4553 - CLUBHOUSE 50,000 14,847 30%9,961 4,885 4562 - RENTAL GOLF CARS 38,000 - 0%90 (90) 4571 - RENTAL CLUBS & PULL CARTS 6,200 - 0%3 (3) 4584 - LOCKER RENTAL - - - - 4591 - GREEN FEES EIGHTEEN HOLES - (11) 5,099 (5,110) 4592 - GREEN FEES NINE HOLES - 7,536 9,502 (1,966) 4593 - GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE 325,000 4,836 1%3,065 1,771 4601 - DRIVING RANGE 340,000 (5) (0)%14,726 (14,731) 4602 - LESSONS 42,500 52,719 124%53,243 (524) 4603 - COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 1,500 3,421 228%3,535 (114) 4604 - SPONSORSHIP INCOME 1,000 - 0%361 (361) 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - 529 (94) 623 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 1,271,700 406,423 32%387,358 19,065 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (72,500) (17,366) 24%(23,515) 6,149 6000:6099 - Personal Services (758,350) (254,921) 34%(257,440) 2,519 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (377,700) (74,909) 20%(87,481) 12,572 6400:6699 - Commodities (120,000) (17,976) 15%(21,919) 3,943 6800:6899 - Central Services (144,516) (36,129) 25%(35,591) (538) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (832,500) (154,089) 19%(177,501) 23,412 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (2,305,566) (555,389) 24%(603,447) 48,057 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(1,033,866) (148,966) 14%(216,088) 67,122 Golf Course Revenues and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 9 Braemar Field Revenues: Braemar Field revenues total $96k through first quarter 2018 compared to $102k in the prior year. General Admissions are up over prior year due to the late spring and high demand on indoor practice space. Building Rental is down to the automatic reversal of year end accrual entries. Expenses: Braemar Field expenses total $230k through March 31st vs $203k for the prior year’s first quarter. Increase of $26k is due to Contractual Services ($17k) and Personal Services ($11k). Increase in Personal Services is due to allocation of staff time to Braemar Field as well as staffing the admission desk at the Dome, which is assisting in an increase in General Admissions. Increase in Contractual Services is due to Dome repairs and an overall increase in utility cost. Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/(Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4317 - ADVERTISING SALES 500 - 0%- - 4607 - CLASS REGISTRATION - 651 -- 651 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - (4) -0 (4) 4415 - VENDING SALES 1,000 - -- 4541 - GENERAL ADMISSIONS 13,000 13,599 105%11,049 2,549 4544 - DAILY SKATING FEES - - -- - 4551 - BUILDING RENTAL 300,000 81,727 27%91,177 (9,449) 4556 - ICE RENTAL 85,000 - 0%- - TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 399,500 95,973 24%102,226 (6,253) OPERATING EXPENSE 6000:6099 - Personal Services (160,855) (35,199) 22%(24,150) (11,049) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (163,250) (59,130) 36%(42,260) (16,870) 6400:6699 - Commodities (14,250) (1,883) 13%(4,781) 2,898 6800:6899 - Central Services (17,568) (4,392) 25%(3,019) (1,373) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (516,000) (129,000) 25%(128,961) (39) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (871,923) (229,604) 26%(203,171) (26,433) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(472,423) (133,631) 28%(100,945) (32,686) Sports Dome Revenues and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 10 Edina Liquor Revenues: Retail sales total $2.9M through the first quarter this year compared to $2.7M for the same period in the prior year. Sales are up 5% across Liquor, Wine and Beer Sales. Increase in revenue is driven by a reduction in the number of wine products in the value price point ($7.99- $10.99) and an increase in the mid-tier price point ($11.99-$14.99), the addition of new to market products from regional and local beer manufacturers, as well as increased staff engagement with product training and tastings. Expenses: Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) totals $2M this year versus $2.1M for the same period in the prior year. Decrease in Cost of Goods Sold is due to buying strategy such as strategic buys on top 30 SKUs. Gross Margin increased for Liquor from 16% to 27%, increased for Wine 27% to 33% and remained relatively flat at 25% for Beer. Beer sales are up due to an increased focus in regional and local beer manufacturers where we maintain competitive pricing. Effective January 1, 2018, Cost of Goods Sold reflects the actual cost of items sold, not expensing of items purchased. Historically, invoices have been coded directly to Cost of Goods Sold where the timing of purchases impacted Gross Margin. With the change in process, Cost of Goods Sold will match expenses to revenues. Other expenses include Administrative, Occupancy and Selling. On a whole, current period of $612k is up $65k versus the prior year total of $547k. Increase is due to an increase in Personal Services ($75k), partially offset by a decrease in Contractual Services ($11k). Increase in Personal Services is due to severance ($58k) and increased hours with the addition of Sunday hours beginning July 1, 2017. The Liquor enterprise has reduced hours of operation during the week (opening at 10AM versus 9AM daily) to reduce the impact on expenses and continues to monitor Sunday traffic to determine optimal staff levels. Following are the liquor sales by type, by store: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 11 Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/(Unfav) 4404 - Sales Liquor 50th 631,367 133,437 21%126,492 6,945 Southdale 1,705,141 347,964 20%338,709 9,255 Grandview 1,290,414 274,961 21%258,813 16,148 Total Sales Liquor 3,626,922 756,362 21%724,014 32,348 4405 - Sales Wine 50th 1,341,921 278,342 21%268,471 9,870 Southdale 2,287,218 492,033 22%460,702 31,331 Grandview 2,627,435 536,820 20%521,696 15,125 Total Sales Wine 6,256,574 1,307,195 21%1,250,869 56,326 4406 - Sales Beer 50th 609,790 133,995 22%124,758 9,237 Southdale 1,728,693 353,747 20%342,761 10,987 Grandview 1,278,798 265,643 21%247,465 18,178 Total Sales Beer 3,617,281 753,386 21%714,984 38,402 4407:4409 - Sales Other 50th - 6,323 -9,940 (3,618) Southdale - 17,284 -22,068 (4,784) Grandview - 18,353 -20,324 (1,971) Total Sales Other - 41,960 -52,332 (10,372) Total 50th 2,583,078 552,097 21%529,662 22,435 Southdale 5,721,052 1,211,028 21%1,164,240 46,789 Grandview 5,196,647 1,095,778 21%1,048,297 47,480 Total Retail Sales 13,500,777 2,858,903 21%2,742,199 116,704 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 12 Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/ (Unfav) SALES 4404 - SALES LIQUOR 3,626,922 756,362 21%724,014 32,348 4405 - SALES WINE 6,256,574 1,307,195 21%1,250,869 56,326 4406 - SALES BEER 3,617,281 753,386 21%714,984 38,402 4407 - SALES ICE/MISC - 5,967 - 5,967 4408 - COUPONS/DISCOUNTS - (25) - (25) 4409 - SALES CIGS/MISC - 36,019 52,332 (16,313) 4400:4499 - Total Retail Sales 13,500,777 2,858,903 21%2,742,199 116,704 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5512 - COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR (2,614,463) (551,423) 21%(609,134) 57,711 5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE (4,198,819) (870,651) 21%(907,827) 37,176 5514 - COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER (2,850,203) (564,584) 20%(531,501) (33,082) 5515 - COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX (181,345) (27,372) 15%(39,805) 12,433 5500:5599 - Total Cost of Sales and Services (9,844,830) (2,014,030) 20%(2,088,268) 74,238 GROSS MARGIN 3,655,947 844,873 23%653,931 190,941 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (5860,5840,5820) 6000:6099 - Personal Services (487,341) (127,413) 26%(79,547) (47,866) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (270,007) (75,076) 28%(67,161) (7,915) 6400:6599 - Commodities (6,848) - 0%(499) 499 6800:6899 - Central Services (280,248) (70,062) 25%(66,845) (3,217) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (500) (126) 25%(126) - TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (1,044,944) (272,677) 26%(214,178) (58,498) OCCUPANCY EXPENSES (5861,5841,5821) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (112,648) (22,116) 20%(17,969) (4,147) 6400:6599 - Commodities (18,200) (4,799) 26%(6,999) 2,199 6901:6999 - Depreciation (101,000) (23,718) 23%(25,044) 1,326 TOTAL OCCUPANCY EXPENSES (231,848) (50,633) 22%(50,012) (622) SELLING EXPENSES (5862,5842,5822) 6000:6099 - Personal Services (1,017,894) (267,215) 26%(239,874) (27,341) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (147,450) (16,490) 11%(32,927) 16,437 6400:6599 - Commodities (51,387) (4,591) 9%(10,012) 5,420 TOTAL SELLING EXPENSES (1,216,731) (288,296) 24%(282,813) (5,484) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES (2,493,523) (611,606) 25%(547,003) (64,603) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)1,162,424 233,267 20%106,929 126,338 Liquor Fund Revenues and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 13 Utility Fund Revenues: For the first quarter of 2018, Utility Fund revenue is $4.6M versus $4.3M in 2017. The more material components of Utility Fund revenue are the Sale of Water, Sewer Charges and Storm Sewer Charges. Historically, approximately 17% of Sale of Water is collected in the first quarter with Sewer Charges and Storm Sewer Charges each collecting 25%. The increase year over year is due to rate increases of 5%, 4% and 7% for water, sewer and storm, respectively. Expenses: First quarter Total Operating Expense of $4.3M is higher than prior year by $135k due to increases in personnel costs and depreciation expense. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update March 2018 14 Mar YTD Budget 2018 Mar YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget Used Mar YTD Actual 2017 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE Water/Sewer Fund (5900) Intergovernmental 100,000 - 0%- - Sale of Water 7,579,054 1,201,475 16%1,155,987 45,488 Sale of Water Meters 40,000 14,112 35%10,448 3,664 Penalties 104,000 18,872 18%18,502 370 State Health Charge 92,000 22,089 24%22,065 24 Sewer Charges 9,157,511 2,218,166 24%2,084,508 133,658 Water Rec Fee 549,552 38,178 7%19,400 18,778 Sewer Rec Fee 274,776 19,089 7%9,700 9,389 Certification Fee 12,500 - 0%- - Other Revenue - 1,691 -1,887 (196) Total Water/Sewer Fund (5900)17,909,393 3,533,671 20%3,322,497 211,174 Storm Sewer Fund (5930) Penalties 16,000 3,572 22%3,579 (8) Storm Sewer Charges 3,561,218 929,980 26%876,985 52,995 Total Storm Sewer Fund (5930)3,577,218 933,552 26%880,565 52,987 Recycling Fund (5950) Intergovernmental 110,000 - 0%- - Penalties 2,000 787 39%597 190 Recycling Charges 372,300 90,980 24%86,295 4,685 Total Recycling Fund (5950)484,300 91,766 19%86,891 4,875 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 21,970,911 4,558,990 21%4,289,953 269,037 OPERATING EXPENSE Water/Sewer Fund (5900) Personal Services (2,032,922) (504,097) 25%(399,279) (104,818) Contractual Services (7,116,726) (2,015,818) 28%(2,074,907) 59,089 Commodities (922,750) (134,252) 15%(89,023) (45,229) Central Services (768,948) (192,237) 25%(175,609) (16,628) Depreciation (3,595,000) (919,332) 26%(875,556) (43,776) Total Water/Sewer Fund (5900)(14,436,346) (3,765,736) 26%(3,614,375) (151,361) Storm Sewer Fund (5930) Personal Services (406,448) (48,229) 12%(67,545) 19,316 Contractual Services (291,500) (21,105) 7%(44,651) 23,545 Commodities (124,800) (6,218) 5%(15,357) 9,139 Depreciation (1,400,000) (372,201) 27%(338,652) (33,549) Total Storm Sewer Fund (5930)(2,222,748) (447,753) 20%(466,204) 18,451 Recycling Fund (5950) Personal Services (48,743) (9,953) 20%(10,384) 431 Contractual Services (463,155) (78,643) 17%(76,364) (2,280) Commodities (4,500) - 0%- - Central Services (6,144) (1,536) 25%(1,967) 431 Total Recycling Fund (5950)(522,542) (90,132) 17%(88,714) (1,418) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (17,181,636) (4,303,622) 25%(4,169,294) (134,328) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)4,789,275 255,368 5%120,660 134,708 Utilities Fund Revenue and Expenses As of March 31, 2018 SCORECARD SALES Q1 2017 Q1 2018 Year Over Year Gross Profit Margin 2017 Gross Profit Margin 2018 2017 Profit 2018 Profit % to Budget Edina Liquor Total Sales $2,742,199 $2,858,903 4%27.5%29.75%$108,015 $258,853 22% Southdale $1,164,240 $1,211,028 4%27.2%29.52% Grandview $1,048,297 $1,095,778 5%27.9%29.9% 50th & France $529,662 $552,097 4%27.7%29.95% Cost of Goods Sold $2,088,268 $2,014,030 STORE OPERATIONS 2017 2018 Year Over Year Notes Operating Expenses $547,033 $587,762 7% Southdale $266,267 17% Grandview 50th & France Customer Count March, 2018 •239% Increase in Profitability •$60K increase in Wine Revenue, $40K Increase in Beer Revenue •11% Increase in Labor Costs ($27,341) Sundays are primary driver •Trending to 30% GP •Q1 2017 Traffic Trend 3% decline, significant turn around year over year ($76,636)$44,549 $122,913 $116,707 5% $196,236 $204,787 4% $92,677 $123,379 $91,507 $90,924 $227,853 4% 9% 33% 31% Shrink/ Inventory Loss N/A Coming Soon 107,890 110,718 3% Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 1 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n DE F I N I T I O N S : Bu d g e t G o a l : De s c r i b e s th e b r o a d o u t c o m e s t h a t m u s t b e a c h i e v e d t h r o u g h t h e b u d g e t . Bu d g e t O b j e c t i v e : De f i n e s t h e m e a s u r a b l e r e s u l t s t h a t n e e d t o b e a c h i ev e d t h i s b u d g e t , t o m e e t t h e g o a l s . St r a t e g y / A c t i o n : De t a i l s t h e s p e c i f i c a c t i o n s t o b e t a k e n t h i s b u d g e t t o m e e t t h e o b j e c t i v e s . KE Y Q U A L I T Y O F L I F E SU R V E Y R E S U L T S (su r v e y c o n d u c t e d i n o d d y e a r s ) 2017 2015 % o f r e s i d e n t s w h o r a t e t h e q u a l i t y o f l i f e i n E d i n a a s “ E x c e l l e n t ” o r “ G o o d ” 97% 96% % o f r e s i d e n t s w h o t h i n k t h i n g s i n E d i n a a r e g e n e r a ll y h e a d e d i n t h e r i g h t d i r e c t i o n 75% 73% % o f r e s i d e n t s w h o r a t e t h e v a l u e o f s e r v i c e s f o r t he t a x e s p a i d to t h e C i t y o f E d i n a a s “ E x c e l l e n t ” o r “ G o o d ” 81% 78% % o f r e s i d e n t s w h o r a t e t h e o v e r a l l c o n f i d e n c e i n E di n a g o v e r n m e n t a s “ E x c e l l e n t ” o r “ G o o d ” 69% 72% % o f r e s i d e n t s w h o r a t e p e r f o r m a n c e o f E d i n a g o v e r n me n t i n “ t r e a t i n g a l l r e s i d e n t s f a i r l y ” a s “E x c e l l e n t ” o r “G o o d ” 69% 72% Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 2 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n BU D G E T G O A L 1 : M A I N T A I N P H Y S I C A L A S S E T S & I N F R A S T R UC T U R E An e f f e c t i v e m a i n t e n a n c e p l a n : 1 ) f a c t o r s f i n a n c i a l , s o c i e t a l a n d e n v i r o n m e n t a l c o s t s ( t r i p l e - b o t t o m l in e ) i n t o p r o j e c t s a n d d e c i s i o n m a k i n g ; 2 ) al l o w s m o r e i n f o r m e d d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g b y i n c o r p o r a t i ng l i f e c y c l e a n d m a i n t e n a n c e c o s t s ; 3 ) o p t i m i z e f i n an c i a l r e s o u r c e s b y r e p l a c i n g eq u i p m e n t a n d v e h i c l e s a t t h e m o s t c o s t - e f f e c t i v e t im e ; a n d 4 ) m e e t s o u r s u s t a i n a b i l i t y g o a l s t o e n s u r e t h e C i t y c a n c o n t i n u e t o p r o v i d e re s i d e n t s t h e h i g h e s t q u a l i t y o f l i f e . De f e r r e d m a i n t e n a n c e c a n l e a d t o c o s t l y u n p l a n n e d r ep a i r s a n d r e p l a c e m e n t s w i t h d e c i s i o n s b a s e d o n s h o rt - t e r m i m p l e m e n t a t i o n c o s t s , ve r s u s l o n g - t e r m m a i n t e n a n c e c o s t s . P r o p e r l y m a i n t a in e d s t r e e t s , w a t e r m a i n , s a n i t a r y s e w e r a n d s t o r m se w e r s y s t e m s p r o v i d e r e l i a b l e a n d ef f i c i e n t o p e r a t i o n s t h a t l e s s e n t h e C i t y ’ s c a r b o n fo o t p r i n t , a n d r e d u c e e n e r g y c o s t s . 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 O B J E C T I V E S : • In c o r p o r a t e s u s t a i n a b i l i t y p r a c t i c e s i n t o a l l C i t y ma i n t e n a n c e a n d c a p i t a l i m p r o v e m e n t d e c i s i o n s . • Re d u c e t h e C i t y o p e r a t i o n s ’ e l e c t r i c i t y G H G e m i s s i o ns b y 5 % , 8 9 3 , 0 0 0 k W h e a c h y e a r t h r o u g h o n g o i n g f a c ility maintenance, capital im p r o v e m e n t s , a n d o p e r a t i o n a l b e h a v i o r c h a n g e . • In c r e a s e t h e C I P l e v y t o $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 b y 2 0 2 1 t h r o u g h a c o m b i n a t i o n o f s t a g e d i n c r e a s e s a n d t h e r o l l o v e r o f e x p i r i n g l e v i e s ( W e b e r Wo o d s , C i t y H a l l ) . C o n t i n u e t o d i r e c t g e n e r a l f u n d su r p l u s e s a n d l i q u o r p r o f i t s . • In c r e a s e C i t y ’ s i n v e s t m e n t i n s t r e e t s a n d b r i d g e m a in t e n a n c e b y $ 5 5 0 , 0 0 0 i n 2 0 1 8 a n d $ 6 0 5 , 0 0 0 i n 2 0 1 9 . 20 1 8 -20 1 9 S t r a t e g i e s / A c t i o n s : Pr o g r e s s : 1. Cr e a t e a n d i m p l e m e n t a g r e e n b u i l d i n g p o l i c y f o r C i ty f a c i l i t i e s b y Q4 o f 2 0 1 8 . (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . N o s t a r t e d y e t . 2. Cr e a t e a m a s t e r r e p l a c e m e n t s c h e d u l e a n d b u d g e t f o r p h y s i c a l bu i l d i n g s , p l u m b i n g , H V A C a n d o t h e r m e c h a n i c a l s y s t em s , IN P R O G R E S S . W e a r e p r e s e n t i n g t o t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n M a y 15 t o p r e s e n t t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e F a c i l i t i e s A s s e t M a nagement pr o j e c t . Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 3 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n fu r n i t u r e , f i x t u r e s , a n d e q u i p m e n t t h a t o p t i m i z e s l on g - t e r m f i n a n c i a l re s o u r c e s t o m e e t s u s t a i n a b i l i t y g o a l s b y Q 3 o f 2 0 1 8. (P u b l i c W o r k s ) 3. Cr e a t e a n d i m p l e m e n t e n e r g y - e f f i c i e n c y p l a n f o r C i t y H a l l , B r a e m a r Ar e n a , E d i n b o r o u g h P a r k , a n d C e n t e n n i a l L a k e s b y Q 4 o f 2 0 1 8 . (P u b l i c W o r k s ) IN P R O G R E S S . B a s e o n t h e r e s u l t s o f t h e d i s c u s s i o n r e g a r d i n g th e f i r s t g o a l , w e w i l l b e g i n c r e a t i o n o f t h e e n e r g y efficiency plan. We h a v e p e r f o r m e d a c o m m i s s i o n i n g s t u d y o n t h e B r a e mar ar e n a , w h i c h w i l l b e i n s t r u m e n t a l i n f o r m i n g t h e p l an for that fa c i l i t y . 4. Co m p l e t e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f W a t e r T r e a t m e n t P l a n t N o . 5. – b y Q 3 o f 20 1 9 . (E n g i n e e r i n g ) IN P R O G R E S S . D e s i g n i s o n g o i n g ; c o n s t r u c t i o n d e l a y e d t o de t e r m i n e a r c h i t e c t u r a l f i t i n S o u t h d a l e A r e a . 5. Co m p l e t e u p d a t e t o t h e W a t e r R e s o u r c e s M a n a g e m e n t C ha p t e r o f th e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n – W a s t e w a t e r , S u r f a c e W a t e r , a n d W a t e r Su p p l y b y Q 4 o f 2 0 1 8 . (E n g i n e e r i n g ) IN P R O G R E S S . Al l s t u d i e s n e a r i n g c o m p l e t i o n a n d c h a p t e r la n g u a g e e d i t s a r e u n d e r w a y . 6. Id e n t i f y f u n d i n g s o u r c e a n d t i m e l i n e f o r i m p l e m e n t a ti o n o f t h e F r e d Ri c h a r d s P a r k M a s t e r P l a n b y Q 2 o f 2 0 1 8 . (P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . We h a v e n o t s t a r t e d w o r k i n g o n t h i s y e t . 7. Id e n t i f y f u n d i n g s o u r c e a n d t i m e l i n e f o r i m p l e m e n t a ti o n f o r Br a e m a r P a r k M a s t e r P l a n b y Q 2 o f 2 0 1 8 . (P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . P r o j e c t s h a v e b e e n p r i o r i t i z e d . T h i s w i l l b e co m p l e t e d b y t h e e n d o f Q 2 . 8. Pa r t n e r w i t h S t . L o u i s P a r k t o d e v e l o p W e b e r W o o d s Ma s t e r P l a n , id e n t i f y f u n d i n g s o u r c e a n d t i m e l i n e f o r i m p l e m e n t a ti o n b y Q 4 o f 20 1 8 . (P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . S t . L o u i s P a r k h a s r e q u e s t e d t h a t w e d e l a y t h e st a r t o f t h i s p r o j e c t . A t t h i s t i m e a d e l a y u n t i l 2 019 is anticipated. 9. Id e n t i f y f u n d i n g s o u r c e f o r A r d e n P a r k M a s t e r P l a n im p l e m e n t a t i o n . Be g i n d e s i g n p h a s e ( Q 1 2 0 1 8 ) . B e g i n c o n s t r u c t i o n ( Q 4 2 0 1 8 o r Q 1 20 1 9 ) . (P a r k s & R e c r e a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . A f u n d i n g s o u r c e h a s b e e n i d e n t i f i e d a n d t h e Ci t y C o u n c i l w i l l b e a s k e d f o r f o r m a l i z e t h e f u n d i n g source when we r e a c h t h e a p p r o p r i a t e s t a g e i n t h e p r o c e s s . A t t he 60% phase in M a y t h e C o u n c i l w i l l b e a s k e d i f w e s h o u l d p r o c e ed with the pr o j e c t d e s i g n . Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 4 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n BU D G E T G O A L 2 : MA I N T A I N S E R V I C E - L E V E L S T H A T B E S T M E E T T H E N E E D S O F T H E C O M M U N I T Y . Ma i n t a i n i n g s e r v i c e - l e v e l s c o n t r i b u t e s t o t h e o v e r a ll q u a l i t y o f l i f e , s a f e t y a n d w e l l b e i n g f o r o u r r e si d e n t s a n d g u e s t s . I t i s i m p o r t a n t b e c a u s e ef f e c t i v e s e r v i c e - l e v e l s : 1 ) e n s u r e s c o m p l i a n c e w i th s t a t e s t a t u t e s a n d c i t y c o d e ; 2 ) m a i n t a i n s a d e q u at e r e s p o n s e t i m e s ; 3 ) e n s u r e s r e s o u r c e s ar e m a t c h e d t o s e r v i c e - l e v e l r e q u i r e m e n t s ; a n d 4 ) e ns u r e s l i m i t e d r e s o u r c e s ( m o n e y , e q u i p m e n t , a n d t i m e) a r e d e p l o y e d i n a n e q u i t a b l e ma n n e r . To m a i n t a i n s e r v i c e - l e v e l s , t h e C i t y n e e d s a s t r o n g w o r k f o r c e t h a t h a v e t h e r e s o u r c e s n e e d e d t o e f f e c t iv e l y p e r f o r m t h e i r w o r k . T o r e c r u i t an d r e t a i n a s t r o n g w o r k f o r c e , t h e C i t y n e e d s t o p r ov i d e c o m p e t i t i v e c o m p e n s a t i o n , b e n e f i t s , a n d w o r k - li f e b a l a n c e . I n v e s t i n g i n t e c h n o l o g y al l o w s s t a f f t o m o r e e f f i c i e n t l y m a i n t a i n a n d l o c a t e d a t a f o r t h e p u b l i c , p r o v i d e b e t t e r d a t a a n d a n a l ys i s f o r i n f o r m e d d e c i s i o n - m a k i n g b y el e c t e d o f f i c i a l s a n d s t a f f , r e d u c e s r i s k o f l o s t d at a o r h u m a n e r r o r , a n d a l l o w s m o r e e f f e c t i v e u s e o f o u r r e a l e s t a t e b y r e d u c i n g p a p e r st o r a g e s p a c e . 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B U D G E T O B J E C T I V E S : • Pr o v i d e i n c r e a s e s t o c o m p e n s a t i o n a n d b e n e f i t s n e e d ed t o a t t r a c t a n d r e t a i n s k i l l e d a n d h i g h - p e r f o r m i n g e m p l o y e e s . • Ad d s t a f f n e e d e d t o m a i n t a i n p u b l i c s a f e t y s e r v i c e - le v e l s i n r e s p o n s e t o g r o w t h i n n u m b e r a n d c o m p l e x i ti e s o f c a l l s f o r s e r v i c e s . • In v e s t i n t e c h n o l o g y u p g r a d e s t o i m p r o v e d a t a c o l l e ct i o n , d a t a m a n a g e m e n t , a n d s t a f f e f f i c i e n c y . 20 1 8 -20 1 9 S t r a t e g i e s / A c t i on s : Pr o g r e s s : 1. Ad d 4 p u b l i c s a f e t y p o s i t i o n s i n 2 0 1 8 i n c l u d i n g 2 p ol i c e of f i c e r s , 1 9 - 1 1 d i s p a t c h e r , a n d 1 p o l i c e a d m i n i s t r at i v e s u p p o r t po s i t i o n b y Q 2 2 0 1 8 . (H u m a n R e s o u r c e s ) IN P R O G R E S S . Re c r u i t i n g p r o c e s s n e a r l y c o m p l e t e w i t h t w o p o l i c e of f i c e r s a n d A d m i n i s t r a t i v e p o s i t i o n i n f i n a l s t a g e s of background sc r e e n i n g . 2. Ad d 4 p u b l i c s a f e t y p o s i t i o n s i n 2 0 1 9 , i n c l u d i n g 3 pa r a m e d i c / f i r e f i g h t e r s a n d 1 E M S c a p t a i n b y Q 1 2 0 1 9 . (H u m a n R e s o u r c e s ) IN P R O G R E S S . N o Q 1 p r o g r e s s t o r e p o r t . Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 5 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n 3. HR a n d F i n a n c e t o j o i n t l y r e s e a r c h f i n a n c i a l / H R I S s y st e m s b y Q2 2 0 1 8 , i d e n t i f y i n g f u n d i n g a n d d e v e l o p p r o j e c t t i me l i n e b y Q3 2 0 1 8 . (H u m a n R e s o u r c e s ) IN P R O G R E S S . C o m p l e t e d a n d p u b l i s h e d R F P f o r E R P c o n s u l t a n t . Q2 : C u r r e n t l y r e v i e w i n g R F P s f o r E R P C o n s u l t a n t , s e l ection to take pl a c e f i r s t w e e k i n M a y . 4. De v e l o p b u d g e t , i d e n t i f y f u n d i n g , a n d t i m e l i n e f o r im p l e m e n t a t i o n o f b o d y - w o r n c a m e r a i n i t i a t i v e f o r P ol i c e De p a r t m e n t b y Q 4 2 0 1 8 . (P o l i c e ) IN P R O G R E S S . R e s e a r c h i n g p r i c i n g f o r C I P p r o c e s s . G a t h e r i n g in f o r m a t i o n f o r a d r a f t p o l i c y . 5. Id e n t i f y f u n d i n g a n d s t a g e d s t r a t e g y t o c o n t i n u e t o u p g r a d e an d e x p a n d G I S . Q 1 2 0 1 8 . (C T S ) IN P R O G R E S S . A m e e t i n g h a s b e e n s c h e d u l e d w i t h r e p r e s e n t a t i v e s o f the Ad m i n i s t r a t i o n , C o m m u n i c a t i o n s & T e c h n o l o g y S e r v i c e s, Engineering and Fi n a n c e d e p a r t m e n t s t o s t a r t t o i d e n t i f y a f u n d i n g source. 6. De v e l o p a n d i m p l e m e n t a r e n t a l h o u s i n g l i c e n s e a n d in s p e c t i o n p r o g r a m b y Q 1 2 0 1 9 . (P u b l i c H e a l t h ) IN P R O G R E S S . C o o r d i n a t i o n b e t w e e n H e a l t h a n d F i r e t o d e v e l o p p r oposal. In i t i a l d r a f t p r o p o s a l t o b e p r e s e n t e d t o C o u n c i l a t work session in Summer 20 1 8 , w i t h f i n a l p r e s e n t a t i o n i n F a l l . BU D G E T G O A L 3 : P L A N F O R C O N N E C T E D & S U S T A I N A B L E D E VE L O P M E N T Re d e v e l o p m e n t a n d r e n e w a l o f c o m m e r c i a l a n d r e s i d e n ti a l r e a l e s t a t e i s e s s e n t i a l t o t h e v i b r a n c y o f t h e c o m m u n i t y . R e d e v e l o p m e n t w i l l pl a y a n i n t e g r a l p a r t o f p r o v i d i n g a n i n c l u s i v e , h i gh - q u a l i t y o f l i f e t h a t t h e E d i n a c o m m u n i t y e x p e c t s . I n c o r p o r a t i n g s u s t a i n a b i l i t y p r i n c i p l e s a n d st a n d a r d s d u r i n g r e d e v e l o p m e n t w i t h t h e g o a l o f r e d uc i n g t h e c o m m u n i t y ’ s c a r b o n f o o t p r i n t w i l l b e c r i t ic a l t o h u m a n h e a l t h a n d s a f e t y . Cr e a t i n g s u s t a i n a b l e r e d e v e l o p m e n t r e q u i r e s f o r w a r d t h i n k i n g a n d p r e p a r i n g f o r t h e f u t u r e . An e f f e c t i v e p l a n f o r c o n n e c t e d a n d s u s t a i n a b l e d e v el o p m e n t : 1 ) i n c o r p o r a t e s s u s t a i n a b i l i t y p r i n c i p l e s a n d s t a n d a r d s c r i t i c a l t o d e c o u p l i n g ec o n o m i c g r o w t h a n d g r e e n h o u s e g a s ( G H G ) e m i s s i o n s gr o w t h ; 2 ) i s g e n e r a t i o n a l l y r e l e v a n t a n d y e t f l e x i bl e e n o u g h t o m e e t c h a n ging future Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 6 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n ne e d s ; 3 ) i n c l u d e s a n e f f e c t i v e a n d m u l t i -mo d a l m u n i c i p a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s y s t e m w h i c h b a l a n c e s e f f e c t i v e a n d e f f i c i e n t p e r s o n a l m o b i l i t y w i t h th e g o a l s o f r e d u c i n g t h e c o m m u n i t y ’ s c a r b o n f o o t p r in t a n d n e g a t i v e i m p a c t s o n h u m a n h e a l t h a n d s a f e t y . 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B U D G E T O B J E C T I V E S : • Su p p o r t s u s t a i n a b l e b u i l d i n g p r a c t i c e s a n d p o l i c i e s t h a t m e e t t h e n e e d o f r e d e v e l o p m e n t a n d r e n e w a l w h il e a c c o m p l i s h i n g o u r su s t a i n a b i l i t y g o a l s a r o u n d c a r b o n e m i s s i o n r e d u c t i on , w a s t e , a n d w a t e r q u a l i t y . • Su p p o r t r e d e v e l o p m e n t t h a t i n c o r p o r a t e s t r a n s p o r t a t io n d e s i g n t h a t m a k e s i t e a s y t o w a l k , b i k e , a n d m o ve a r o u n d w i t h i n a n d be t w e e n n e i g h b o r h o o d s . • In c r e a s e t h e n u m b e r o f a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g u n i t s w i t hi n E d i n a . 20 1 8 -20 1 9 S t r a t e g i e s / A c t i o n s : Pr o g r e s s : 1. Co m p l e t e C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n U p d a t e b y Q 4 2 0 1 8 . (C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t ) IN P R O G R E S S . 44 th a n d F r a n c e S A P i s c o m p l e t e d ; 7 0 th & Cahill SAP is in d r a f t f o r m ; a n d 5 0 th a n d F r a n c e S A P i s s t a r t i n g . A l l c o m m i s s i o n s su b m i t t e d d r a f t s o f t h e i r i s s u e s , g o a l s a n d p o l i c i e s for their portion of th e P l a n . P u b l i c h e a r i n g s o n t h e c o m p l e t e d P l a n i s anticipated in No v e m b e r w i t h t h e P l a n n i n g C o m m i s s i o n a n d D e c e m b e r by the City Co u n c i l . 2. Cr e a t e a n d i m p l e m e n t a g r e e n b u i l d i n g p o l i c y t o i n c en t su s t a i n a b l e b u i l d i n g a n d o p e r a t i o n a l p r a c t i c e s f o r ne w de v e l o p m e n t a n d r e d e v e l o p m e n t b y Q 1 2 0 1 9 . (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . No t s t a r t e d y e t . 3. Ap p r o v e p r e l i m i n a r y r e d e v e l o p m e n t p l a n o f 7 0 0 1 Y o r k Av e n u e ( S o u t h d a l e R e g i o n a l L i b r a r y S i t e ) Q 4 2 0 1 8 . (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . H e n n e p i n C o u n t y L i b r a r y s t a f f h a v e s c h e d u l e d c o m m unity me e t i n g s f o r M a y 2 1 a n d J u l y 2 3 t o c o l l e c t f e e d b a c k on the design of the li b r a r y . Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 7 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n 4. Im p l e m e n t t h e C o n s t r u c t i o n M i t i g a t i o n a n d P a r k i n g Ma n a g e m e n t P l a n f o r t h e M a r k e t S t r e e t r e d e v e l o p m e n t pr o j e c t f o r c o m p l e t i o n b y Q 4 2 0 1 9 ? (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . T h i s P l a n i s a c t i v e l y b e i n g i m p l e m e n t e d . I t h a s b e en su p p l e m e n t e d b y a d d i t i o n a l m i t i g a t i o n s t e p s s u c h a s off-site employee shuttle. 5. De t e r m i n e t h e v i a b i l i t y o f t h e G r a n d v i e w G r e e n a n d de c i d e wh e t h e r t o i n c l u d e i n G r a n d v i e w A r e a M a s t e r P l a n b y Q 2 20 1 8 . (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . A c o n c e p t u p d a t e w a s d e l i v e r e d i n A p r i l . T h e g e n e r al di r e c t i o n w a s t o a l l o w f o r t h i s t y p e o f p r o j e c t i n s tead of preventing it in the fu t u r e . 6. Ap p r o v e a m a s t e r p l a n f o r t h e r e d e v e l o p m e n t o f t h e Gr a n d v i e w a r e a , i n c l u d i n g t h e f o r m e r P u b l i c W o r k s s it e b y Q 4 20 1 8 . (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . N e g o t i a t i o n s w i t h t h e D e v e l o p m e n t P a r t n e r a r e o n g o ing. 7. Im p l e m e n t s h o r t - a n d m i d - t e r m i m p r o v e m e n t s f r o m t h e Gr a n d v i e w D i s t r i c t T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S t u d y b y Q 4 2 0 1 9 . (E n g i n e e r i n g ) IN P R O G R E S S . Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t s b e i n g c o n s i d e r e d a s re d e v e l o p m e n t o c c u r s a n d G r a n d v i e w G r e e n d i s c u s s i o n s continue. 8. Im p l e m e n t S o u t h d a l e A r e a C i r c u l a t o r p i l o t b y Q 4 2 0 1 8. (E n g i n e e r i n g ) IN P R O G R E S S . T a s k f o r c e d e v e l o p i n g r o u t e s a n d s e r v i c e l o c a t i o n s for a J u n e 2 0 1 8 l a u n c h . 9. De t e r m i n e s t r a t e g y a n d t i m e l i n e f o r m e e t i n g w a s t e r ed u c t i o n go a l s w i t h r e s i d e n t i a l o r g a n i c s r e c y c l i n g b y Q 2 2 0 1 8. (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . C o n d u c t e d w o r k s e s s i o n w i t h C i t y C o u n c i l i n M a r c h . Po l i c y o p t i o n s w i l l b e p r e s e n t e d t o E E C i n M a y . BU D G E T G O A L 4 : F O S T E R I N C L U S I V E A N D E N G A G E D C O M M U N IT Y . It i s i m p o r t a n t t h a t t h e C i t y h e l p s t o f o s t e r a c o m mu n i t y t h a t i s w e l c o m i n g a n d i n c l u s i v e t o a l l w h o l iv e , w o r k , a n d s p e n d t i m e w i t h i n i n Ed i n a . T h e C i t y w a n t s t o e n s u r e t h a t i t w o r k s f o r a ll o f t h e c o m m u n i t y , a n d t h a t i t s p o l i c i e s a n d p r a c ti c e s d o n o t h a v e d i s p a r a t e i m p a c t s ba s e d o n r a c e , c o l o r , c r e e d , r e l i g i o n , a g e , s e x , s e xu a l o r i e n t a t i o n , g e n d e r e x p r e s s i o n , m a r i t a l s t a t u s , d i s a b i l i t y , s t a t u s w i t h r e g a r d t o p u b l i c as s i s t a n c e , f a m i l i a l s t a t u s o r n a t i o n a l o r i g i n . E f fo r t s t o e n g a g e t h e c o m m u n i t y w i l l u t i l i z e m u l t i p l e p l a t f o r m s , b e i n f o r m a t i v e , t r a n s p a r e n t , re s p o n s i v e a n d i n v o l v e v o l u n t e e r s a n d C i t y C o m m i s s i on s . Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 8 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n To a c h i e v e t h i s , t h e C i t y n e e d s t o 1 ) c l e a r l y u n d e r st a n d c o m m u n i t y n e e d s , e x p e c t a t i o n s a n d o p i n i o n s , 2) c o n s i s t e n t l y s e e k t h e i n p u t o f a br o a d r a n g e o f s t a k e h o l d e r s i n m e a n i n g f u l a n d i n t e r ac t i v e c o m m u n i c a t i o n , 3 ) d e v e l o p c l e a r r o l e s a n d e x pe c t a t i o n s , a n d 4 ) “ r i g h t - s i z e ” co m m u n i t y e n g a g e m e n t e f f o r t s t o e n s u r e t h a t i n v e s t m en t s a r e f o c u s e d o n b r o a d e n i n g s t a k e h o l d e r s r e a c h e d . 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B U D G E T O B J E C T I V E S : • De v e l o p a m o r e s t r a t e g i c a p p r o a c h t o C o m m u n i t y E n g a ge m e n t . • Ad v a n c e r a c i a l e q u i t y w i t h i n C i t y G o v e r n m e n t . • In c r e a s e t h e n u m b e r o f a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g u n i t s w i t hi n t h e C i t y . 20 1 8 -20 1 9 S t r a t e g i e s / A c t i o n s : Pr o g r e s s : 1. In c o r p o r a t e i n c l u s i v e p r i n c i p l e s i n t o C o m p r e h e n s i v e P l a n Up d a t e , i n c l u d i n g r a c e , r e l i g i o n , a g e , g e n d e r , e t c . b y Q 4 2 0 1 8 . (C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t ) IN P R O G R E S S . S a m e a s a b o v e . 2. Pr o v i d e r e s o u r c e s a n d s t a f f s u p p o r t t o R a c e & E q u i t y T a s k Fo r c e / W o r k i n g G r o u p s . (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN P R O G R E S S . Ra c e & E q u i t y T a s k F o r c e m e t w i t h C i t y C o u n c i l o n Ap r i l 1 7 t o r e v i e w a h i g h - l e v e l s u m m a r y o f t h e r e c o mmendations. The fi n a l t a s k f o r c e r e p o r t w i l l b e p r e s e n t e d t o C i t y C ouncil on May 15, at wh i c h p o i n t s t a f f w i l l b e g i n t h e i r r e v i e w . 3. De v e l o p a n d i m p l e m e n t a p l a n t o i n c r e a s e d i v e r s i t y of t h e Ci t y ’ s w o r k f o r c e b y Q 2 2 0 1 8 . ( H u m a n R e s o u r c e s ) IN P R O G R E S S . In p r o c e s s . 4. In c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h t h e E d i n a H o u s i n g F o u n d a t i o n , d e ve l o p an d i m p l e m e n t s t r a t e g y t o c r e a t i n g a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i ng u n i t s wi t h r e v e n u e f r o m A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g P o l i c y b y Q 2 2 01 8 . (C o m m u n i t y D e v e l o p m e n t ) IN P R O G R E S S . T h e h o u s i n g f o u n d a t i o n i s c o n s i d e r i n g a s t r a t e g y and is c u r r e n t l y a d v e r t i s i n g f o r a n A f f o r d a b l e H o u s i n g Coordinator to assist wi t h t h i s g o a l . Up d a t e d 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 2 2 Q1 U p d a t e 2 0 1 8 . 0 5 . 1 0 Pa g e 9 20 1 8 - 2 0 1 9 B u d g e t W o r k P l a n 5. De v e l o p c o m m u n i t y e n g a g e m e n t p r o t o c o l s b a s e d o n I A P 2 Sp e c t r u m M o d e l o f I n f o r m , C o n s u l t , I n v o l v e , C o l l a b o ra t e , Em p o w e r o r o t h e r b y Q 4 2 0 1 8 . (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) IN - P R O G R E S S . P r o j e c t C o o r d i n a t o r a n d A s s i s t a n t C i t y M a n a g e r w e r e ce r t i f i e d i n F o u n d a t i o n s o f P u b l i c P a r t i c i p a t i o n f r o m IAP2 and co n d u c t e d C i t y C o u n c i l w o r k s e s s i o n i n M a r c h . S t a f f are developing to o l s a n d p l a n t o p r e s e n t r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s t o c o u n c i l in August. 6. As s i g n i n d i v i d u a l c o u n c i l m e m b e r s t o s p e c i f i c in t e r g o v e r n m e n t a l a s s i g n m e n t s b y Q 1 2 0 1 8 a n d a n n u a l ly th e r e a f t e r . (A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ) RE M O V E D . Th e c o u n c i l d i s c u s s e d t h i s i d e a a t t h e J a n . 1 7 w o r k se s s i o n , a n d u l t i m a t e l y d e c i d e d a g a i n s t i t . Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: XI I.B. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: O ther F rom:Don Uram, F inance Director Item Activity: Subject:2017 P reliminary Year End F inancial R eport Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: I N TR O D U C TI O N: Attached is the quarterly financial update for the fourth quarter of 2017. T he final audited financial statements will be presented in June. W hile these amounts are presented as "unaudited", we don't anticipate any changes. F or 2017, G eneral Fund revenues exceed expenditures by $1.2M, Enterprise Fund operating revenues exceed operating expenses (before amortization of bond premiums/discounts, transfers, etc.) by $3.4M. T he $3.4M breaks down as $4.6M U tilities and $1M Liquor offset by ($1.2M) G olf Course, ($328k) Arena and ($746k) in other Nonmajor E nterprise F unds. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Q4 2017 Update CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 1 GENERAL FUND Revenues: General Fund revenues of $41M exceeded prior year actuals and budget by $1.3M and $2.3M, respectively. Property taxes are the primary revenue source. Overall favorability to prior year and budget is driven by favorable property taxes partially offset by a decrease in land donations year over year (Parkland Dedication). Other revenue variances to note include favorability in Licenses and Permits, Charges for Services, and Fines and Forfeitures. Licenses and Permits are favorable due to Liquor License ($15k), Building Permits ($20k), Plumbing Permits ($31k) and Mechanical Permits ($63k). Charges for Services favorability is driven by ambulance fees. Fine and Forfeitures favorability is driven by type and number of fine. Fines and Forfeitures represent our portion of state and federal fines. Expenditures: 2017 total expenditures include $1.9M transfer to the Construction Fund (Resolution 17-76). Excluding the transfer, expenditures were 98% of the budgeted amount ($750k under budget). General Fund departments include Administration, Communications and Technology Services, Human Resources, Finance, Public Works, Public Safety and the Community Development Departments. Favorable expenses to budget for all departments are $96k for Personal Services, $303k for Contractual Services, $129k in Commodities and $220k in Central Services. The percentage of budget used by department approximated 100% for all departments. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 2 Business Unit Full Year Budget 2017 Dec YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget Used Dec YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) Revenues: Property Taxes 26,860,319 26,783,198 100%24,681,407 2,101,792 Franchise Fees 790,000 889,872 113%870,690 19,182 Lodging Tax 20,000 21,006 105%22,624 (1,618) Licenses and Permits 4,192,660 5,324,710 127%5,192,934 131,776 Intergovernmental 1,195,550 1,383,606 116%1,398,980 (15,375) Charges for Services 4,017,973 4,729,419 118%4,449,894 279,525 Fines and Forfeitures 975,000 1,064,271 109%946,199 118,072 Investment Income 120,000 171,094 143%125,095 45,999 Other Revenues 8,100 97,596 1,205%127,496 (29,900) Rental of Property 470,700 459,099 98%514,955 (55,855) Parkland Dedication - 33,460 -1,250,000 (1,216,540) Transfers In 50,000 50,000 100%100,000 (50,000) Total Revenues 38,700,302 41,007,330 106%39,680,274 1,327,057 Expenditures: Administration (1,839,504) (1,752,738) 95%(1,915,629) 162,890 Communicaiton & Technology (1,204,517) (1,171,130) 97%(1,106,679) (64,451) Human Resources (812,755) (808,422) 99%(793,195) (15,227) Finance (880,745) (896,527) 102%(802,791) (93,736) Public Works (9,727,954) (9,375,913) 96%(8,464,788) (911,125) Engineering (1,642,170) (1,501,354) 91%(1,469,706) (31,649) Police (11,438,368) (11,391,701) 100%(10,798,813) (592,889) Fire (7,746,806) (7,661,357) 99%(7,609,838) (51,519) Parks & Recreation (1,597,506) (1,680,908) 105%(1,505,397) (175,511) Community Development (1,809,977) (1,709,336) 94%(1,536,967) (172,369) Transfers Out - (1,880,405) -(804,542) (1,075,863) Total Expenditures (38,700,302) (39,829,790) 98%(36,808,343) (3,021,448) Revenues over/ (under) expenditures - 1,177,540 -2,871,931 (1,694,391) General Fund Revenues and Expenditures - Budget and Actual As of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 3 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Aquatic Center Revenues: Aquatic Center revenues total $962k and represent 95% of the total budgeted revenues for 2017. Total revenues are slightly higher than 2016. The Aquatic Center’s season runs from the beginning of June through late August. The increase over prior year is due to increases in Season Tickets, Building Rental and Concession Sales, partially offset by a decrease in General Admissions. The Aquatic Center revenue was impacted by the closure June 12-16 for repair work and above average rainfall in August keeping the General Admissions (6,077 in 2017 compared to 10,509 in 2016) and Concession Sales lower than expected. Expenses: Aquatic Center expenses total $1,004k compared to $914k in 2016 for a difference of $90k. The increase is mostly due to an increase Depreciation and Personal Services. The increase in Personal Services is due to lifeguard wage adjustments and an additional position for the new play structure. Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4414 - MISC RETAIL SALES 6,300 6,050 96%6,224 (174) 4521 - CONCESSION SALES 135,000 120,138 89%113,971 6,167 4532 - SEASON TICKETS 428,899 407,297 95%389,818 17,479 4317 - ADVERTISING SALES - 998 -998 4541 - GENERAL ADMISSIONS 393,987 370,366 94%392,752 (22,387) 4602 - LESSONS - - -340 (340) 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - (29) -86 (116) 4551 - BUILDING RENTAL 45,000 51,776 115%48,131 3,645 4557 - BIRTHDAY RENTAL 5,000 6,261 125%4,745 1,516 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 1,014,186 962,857 95%956,068 6,789 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (42,000) (47,330) 113%(40,442) (6,888) 6001:6099 - Personal Services (342,914) (384,512) 112%(359,044) (25,467) 6101:6299 - Contractual Services (179,200) (136,359) 76%(147,228) 10,869 6401:6699 - Commodities (89,150) (72,368) 81%(86,024) 13,656 6801:6899 - Central Services (38,396) (37,391) 97%(32,557) (4,833) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (246,500) (325,623) 132%(248,242) (77,382) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (938,160) (1,003,583) 107%(913,537) (90,046) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)76,026 (40,726) (54)%42,531 (83,257) Aquatic Center Revenue and Expenses As of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 4 Art Center Revenues: Art Center revenues total $494k exceeding budget and prior year by $41k and $8k, respectively. Increase is due to an increase in class registrations. Class Registrations account for about 75% of total revenues at the Art Center. Expenses: Art Center expenses total $724k, exceeding budget by $15k, but decreasing versus prior year by $4k. Favorability compared to prior year is mostly due to commodities. The Art Center purchased three HVAC units in 2016. Current year credit balance in Cost of Goods Sold is due to coding inventory purchases to other line items. Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4413 - ART WORK SOLD 12,000 13,216 110%17,236 (4,020) 4414 - MISC RETAIL SALES 28,000 29,289 105%31,801 (2,512) 4521 - CONCESSION SALES 350 652 186%391 261 4531 - MEMBERSHIPS 23,500 14,213 60%14,937 (724) 4607 - CLASS REGISTRATION 355,000 378,897 107%367,311 11,586 4608 - FIRING FEES 25,000 41,252 165%38,493 2,759 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - (13) -89 (102) 4610 - MEDIA STUDIO FEES - - -- - 4614 - POTTERY FEES 9,500 16,866 178%15,971 894 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 453,350 494,372 109%486,229 8,143 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (2,750) 1,581 (57)%(1,766) 3,347 6000:6099 - Personal Services (455,163) (494,763) 109%(492,501) (2,262) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (107,950) (95,853) 89%(92,730) (3,123) 6400:6699 - Commodities (73,800) (68,689) 93%(77,502) 8,813 6800:6899 - Central Services (45,844) (44,451) 97%(39,394) (5,057) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (24,000) (22,032) 92%(23,930) 1,898 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (709,507) (724,207) 102%(727,823) 3,616 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(256,157) (229,835) 90%(241,594) 11,758 Art Center Revenues and Expenses As of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 5 Braemar Arena Revenues: Braemar Arena revenues total $2.5M compared to a budget of $2.25M and prior year of $2.3M. Ice Rental revenue is 67% of total budgeted revenue. Ice Rental is greater than budget and prior year mostly due to increase in rates. Spectator Fees represent the Arena’s share of high school game admissions. The high school game admissions are earned in November and December, but not collected until January. Expenses: Braemar Arena operating expenses total $2.8M which represent 112% of total budgeted expenses. Contractual expenses are higher compared to budget and the prior year due to work done to resolve the melting ice issues in the south arena. To diagnose and help resolve this issue, air in the lines under the ice was purged and additional filters were installed to decrease the sludge level in the lines allowing for better, more consistent coolant flow. Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2018 % of Budget 2018 YTD Actual 2017 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4414 - MISC RETAIL SALES 750 389 52%1,334 (945) 4317 - ADVERTISING SALES 40,000 38,569 96%38,909 (340) 4607 - CLASS REGISTRATION 130,000 158,112 122%141,492 16,621 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT (84) (416) 332 4611 - SKATE SHARPENING - - - - 4415 - VENDING SALES 1,000 10,128 1013%6,287 3,841 4521 - CONCESSION SALES 260,000 306,305 118%321,114 (14,810) 4532 - SEASON TICKETS 5,000 - 0%- - 4542 - SPECTATOR FEES 97,500 24,906 26%(2,698) 27,605 4544 - DAILY SKATING FEES 22,500 38,164 170%29,245 8,919 4551 - BUILDING RENTAL 190,000 205,759 108%205,125 633 4556 - ICE RENTAL 1,500,000 1,691,934 113%1,543,282 148,652 4558 - OTHER RENTAL 26,960 26,000 960 4581 - SKATE RENTAL 3,750 5,171 138%5,084 87 4584 - LOCKER RENTAL - 708 - 708 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 2,250,500 2,507,020 111%2,314,758 192,263 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (105,500) (109,842) 104%(124,582) 14,740 6000:6099 - Personal Services (901,750) (995,357) 110%(986,767) (8,590) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (729,950) (898,906) 123%(783,974) (114,932) 6400:6699 - Commodities (104,750) (100,109) 96%(126,274) 26,165 6800:6899 - Central Services (75,189) (72,879) 97%(66,969) (5,910) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (610,000) (657,763) 108%(622,911) (34,852) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (2,527,139) (2,834,856) 112%(2,711,477) (123,379) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(276,639) (327,836) 119%(396,719) 68,883 Arena Revenues and Expenses As of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 6 Centennial Lakes Revenues: Centennial Lakes revenues total $778k which represent 99% of total budgeted revenue. Revenues such as Concessions, General Admissions, Skate Rental, Equipment Rental and Green Fees are dependent upon appropriate seasonal weather. The warmer 2016/17 winter resulted in lower concessions and skate rental; however, the 2017 spring/summer/fall weather was conducive for Green Fees. Decrease in the Centennial Lakes Park revenue is mostly driven by one-time park maintenance fees of $127k paid in 2016. Expenses: Centennial Lakes expenses total $1,019k which is 93% of total budgeted expenses. Personal Services is higher than prior year due to cost of living adjustment. Contractual Services expenses pertain to live performances at Centennial Lakes Park, as well as programming and licensing. The expense for Contractual Services is favorable to prior year as well as budget due to type of repairs performed each year. In 2016, the large repair was the pond repair and replacement of two water features. Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4317 - ADVERTISING SALES - 91 -91 4524 - CONCESSIONS - CENTENNIAL 34,000 22,998 68%23,069 (71) 4541 - GENERAL ADMISSIONS - (5) -- (5) 4555 - CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK 108,000 81,706 76%103,115 (21,409) 4558 - OTHER RENTAL 8,000 4,346 54%5,290 (945) 4581 - SKATE RENTAL 70,000 50,521 72%54,186 (3,665) 4583 - EQUIPMENT RENTAL 75,000 69,473 93%105,423 (35,949) 4593 - GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE 205,000 247,326 121%232,700 14,626 4604 - SPONSORSHIP INCOME - 231 -- 231 4606 - ASSOCIATION FEE 284,000 300,503 106%415,507 (115,003) 4607 - CLASS REGISTRATION - 1,258 -120 1,138 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - (40) -12 (53) TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 784,000 778,408 99%939,422 (161,014) OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (14,000) (8,488) 61%(11,149) 2,661 6000:6099 - Personal Services (657,428) (644,002) 98%(620,235) (23,767) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (183,925) (144,192) 78%(157,147) 12,955 6400:6699 - Commodities (123,800) (116,002) 94%(124,922) 8,920 6800:6899 - Central Services (73,931) (71,105) 96%(58,503) (12,602) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (42,500) (35,551) 84%(39,595) 4,044 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (1,095,584) (1,019,339) 93%(1,011,552) (7,788) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(311,584) (240,931) 77%(72,130) (168,802) Centennial Lakes Revenues and Expenses AS of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 7 Edinborough Park Revenues: Edinborough Park revenues total $1.6M which represent 116% of total budgeted revenues and an increase over prior year of $219k. Increase is due to one time park maintenance fee catch ups of $109k, 30th Anniversary season pass sales of $20k, and General Admissions which also drives an increase in Concessions. Expenses: Edinborough Park expenses total $1.5M for the year which represent 91% of total budgeted expenses. Contractual Services are higher in 2017 due to building maintenance and staff vacancies. Staff vacancies are also reflected in the lower expense versus budget for Personal Services. Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4521 - CONCESSION SALES - 1,432 -- 1,432 4523 - CONCESSIONS - EDINBOROUGH 130,000 149,195 115%135,136 14,059 4532 - SEASON TICKETS 65,000 148,235 228%125,641 22,594 4541 - GENERAL ADMISSIONS 695,000 716,309 103%617,989 98,320 4557 - BIRTHDAY RENTAL 168,000 182,557 109%191,254 (8,697) 4558 - OTHER RENTAL 58,000 830 1%- 830 4584 - LOCKER RENTAL 1,800 - 0%1,398 (1,398) 4585 - SOCK RENTAL 9,000 11,418 127%10,619 799 4554 - EDINBOROUGH PARK 12,000 59,988 500%59,872 116 4605 - LESSON PROGRAM INCOME - 820 -2,950 (2,130) 4606 - ASSOCIATION FEE 224,000 314,097 140%220,612 93,485 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - (48) -472 (520) TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 1,362,800 1,584,833 116%1,365,945 218,888 OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (85,000) (71,514) 84%(79,385) 7,871 6000:6099 - Personal Services (802,264) (710,275) 89%(704,081) (6,194) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (351,750) (340,886) 97%(288,240) (52,646) 6400:6699 - Commodities (169,800) (136,232) 80%(124,011) (12,221) 6800:6899 - Central Services (85,932) (83,017) 97%(67,005) (16,012) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (176,750) (183,781) 104%(180,550) (3,230) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (1,671,496) (1,525,704) 91%(1,443,272) (82,432) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(308,696) 59,129 (19)%(77,327) 136,456 Edinborough Park Revenues and Expenses As of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 8 Braemar Golf Course Revenues: Golf Course revenues total $1.3M and represent 99% of total budgeted revenues for 2017. Overall revenues are down significantly from 2016 because of the closure of the regulation course. Compared to the prior year with an open regulation course, Green Fees on the regulation course are down $1.2M; Rental Golf Carts are down $274k; Pro Shop Sales are down $125k; Memberships and Building Rental are also down $55k and $42k, respectively. Even with a closed regulation course, Green Fees on the Academy Course are up $148k and Driving Range income is up $23k. Budgets were an estimate with the closed course. Total revenue versus budget is within $19k, but with variances among the revenue line items. Expenses: Golf Course expenses total $2.4M which represent 124% of total budgeted expenses. Due to the closure of the regulation course, the 2017 expenditure budget was reduced to $1.9M compared to $3.1M in 2016. Personal Services are over budget due to the retention of talented employees during the closure. The departure of Tin Fish had a negative impact of $129k on Contractual Services. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 9 Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4406 - SALES BEER - 7,305 -3,144 4,161 4412 - PRO SHOP SALES 40,264 91,739 228%216,537 (124,798) 4414 - MISC RETAIL SALES 112 - 0%- - 4521 - CONCESSION SALES - 3,109 -577 2,532 4531 - MEMBERSHIPS 8,823 22,863 259%77,544 (54,681) 4543 - GOLF DOME RECEIPTS 353,069 346,461 98%319,938 26,523 4551 - BUILDING RENTAL 9,435 9,763 103%51,322 (41,559) 4553 - CLUBHOUSE 91,353 60,459 66%64,394 (3,934) 4562 - RENTAL GOLF CARS 27,484 37,985 138%311,830 (273,845) 4571 - RENTAL CLUBS & PULL CARTS 2,221 6,169 278%25,180 (19,011) 4584 - LOCKER RENTAL 559 - 0%15 (15) 4591 - GREEN FEES EIGHTEEN HOLES - (3,701) -668,312 (672,014) 4592 - GREEN FEES NINE HOLES - 12,054 -544,426 (532,371) 4593 - GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE 338,261 295,833 87%147,453 148,380 4601 - DRIVING RANGE 354,328 330,053 93%306,601 23,452 4602 - LESSONS 40,716 27,496 68%55,185 (27,689) 4603 - COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 95 4,500 4737%11,226 (6,726) 4604 - SPONSORSHIP INCOME 6,818 2,165 32%5,763 (3,598) 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT (237) 161 (68)%(45) 206 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 1,273,301 1,254,412 99%2,809,401 (1,554,989) OPERATING EXPENSE 5500:5599 - Cost of Goods Sold (37,120) (82,968) 224%(169,131) 86,164 6000:6099 - Personal Services (581,231) (860,176) 148%(1,342,085) 481,909 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (367,175) (523,042) 142%(456,824) (66,218) 6400:6699 - Commodities (104,085) (140,868) 135%(260,721) 119,854 6800:6899 - Central Services (142,365) (138,155) 97%(127,369) (10,786) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (710,000) (664,003) 94%(612,166) (51,837) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (1,941,976) (2,409,212) 124%(2,968,297) 559,085 OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(668,675) (1,154,800) 173%(158,895) (995,904) Golf Course Revenues and Expenses As of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 10 Braemar Field Revenues: Braemar Field revenues total $490k through year end which represent 122% of total budgeted revenues. Increase over prior year and budget is driven by an increase in General Admissions and Building Rental due to increased demand and staffing at Braemar Field admissions front desk. Expenses: Braemar Field expenses total $825k which represent 112% of total budgeted expenses. Personal Services expenses increased due to a new maintenance employee and allocation of other staff time to Braemar Field. Depreciation expense increased year over year due to addition of half a year of depreciation for 2016 completed projects such as retaining wall, parking lot, landscape/irrigation and foundation/utilities. Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE 4317 - ADVERTISING SALES - 122 -- 122 4607 - CLASS REGISTRATION 4,500 977 22%28 949 4609 - ENTERPRISE CASH OVER/SHORT - (8) -78 (86) 4415 - VENDING SALES 1,000 - -- - 4541 - GENERAL ADMISSIONS - 19,299 -7,605 11,695 4544 - DAILY SKATING FEES 1,000 2,582 258%2,629 (47) 4551 - BUILDING RENTAL 300,000 383,625 128%307,217 76,408 4556 - ICE RENTAL 95,310 83,280 87%81,150 2,130 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 401,810 489,877 122%398,707 91,170 OPERATING EXPENSE 6000:6099 - Personal Services (60,314) (121,400) 201%(80,492) (40,908) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (149,930) (150,863) 101%(142,499) (8,364) 6400:6699 - Commodities (3,725) (29,648) 796%(17,199) (12,449) 6800:6899 - Central Services (12,074) (11,772) 98%(11,464) (309) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (510,000) (511,578) 100%(418,792) (92,786) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (736,043) (825,262) 112%(670,445) (154,816) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(334,233) (335,385) 100%(271,739) (63,646) Sports Dome Revenue and Expenses As of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 11 Edina Liquor Revenues: Retail sales total $13M through year end which represent 103% of total budgeted sales, and an increase of $56k over 2016. Increase in revenue is driven by a reduction in the number of wine products in the value price point ($7.99-$10.99) and an increase in the mid-tier price point ($11.99-$14.99), the addition of new to market products from regional and local beer manufacturers, as well as increased staff engagement with product training and tastings resulting in increased Average Transaction Value (ATV) and Units per Transaction (UPT). Expenses: Cost of goods sold (COGS) totals $9.4M through year end which represents 99% of total budgeted COGS, a decrease of $183k over 2016. For 2017 the Liquor enterprise implemented new buying strategies such as strategic buys on top 30 SKUs. Total Operating Expenses, including Administrative, Occupancy and Selling Expenses are slightly over budget and prior year by approximately $30k. Increase in 2017 is due to addition of Sunday hours beginning July 1st, Sunday sales added an additional day of business. The Liquor enterprise has reduced the hours of operation during the week (opening at 10AM versus 9AM daily) to reduce the impact on expenses. Following are the liquor sales by type, by store: Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2016 Fav/(Unfav) 4404 - Sales Liquor 50th 555,654 605,248 109%595,138 10,109 Southdale 1,647,479 1,529,915 93%1,574,650 (44,735) Grandview 1,246,777 1,255,270 101%1,194,582 60,688 Total Sales Liquor 3,449,910 3,390,433 98%3,364,371 26,062 4405 - Sales Wine 50th 1,133,494 1,251,631 110%1,264,919 (13,288) Southdale 2,160,628 2,107,275 98%2,155,973 (48,698) Grandview 2,443,683 2,510,735 103%2,476,668 34,067 Total Sales Wine 5,737,805 5,869,641 102%5,897,560 (27,919) 4406 - Sales Beer 50th 533,408 621,250 116%574,799 46,451 Southdale 1,512,440 1,623,342 107%1,629,498 (6,156) Grandview 1,196,906 1,261,847 105%1,205,419 56,428 Total Sales Beer 3,242,754 3,506,439 108%3,409,717 96,723 4407:4409 - Sales Other 50th 38,396 38,696 101%49,959 (11,263) Southdale 95,607 93,806 98%105,948 (12,142) Grandview 103,474 94,375 91%110,103 (15,728) Total Sales Other 237,477 226,878 96%266,011 (39,133) Total 50th 2,260,952 2,516,824 111%2,484,815 32,009 Southdale 5,416,154 5,354,339 99%5,466,070 (111,731) Grandview 4,990,840 5,122,228 103%4,986,774 135,455 Total Retail Sales 12,667,946 12,993,391 103%12,937,659 55,732 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 12 Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) SALES 4404 - SALES LIQUOR 3,449,910 3,390,433 98%3,364,371 26,062 4405 - SALES WINE 5,737,805 5,869,641 102%5,897,560 (27,919) 4406 - SALES BEER 3,242,754 3,506,439 108%3,409,717 96,723 4407 - SALES ICE/MISC - 239 -398 (159) 4408 - COUPONS/DISCOUNTS (16,400) (11,420) 70%(10) (11,410) 4409 - SALES CIGS/MISC 253,877 238,059 94%265,622 (27,564) 4400:4499 - Total Retail Sales 12,667,946 12,993,391 103%12,937,659 55,732 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5512 - COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR (2,525,993) (2,543,947) 101%(2,604,817) 60,870 5513 - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE (4,051,367) (3,985,057) 98%(4,155,143) 170,086 5514 - COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER (2,762,908) (2,719,336) 98%(2,700,738) (18,598) 5515 - COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX (176,803) (193,913) 110%(164,516) (29,397) 5500:5599 - Total Cost of Sales and Services (9,517,071) (9,442,253) 99%(9,625,214) 182,961 GROSS MARGIN 3,150,875 3,551,138 113%3,312,445 238,694 ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (5860,5840,5820) 6000:6099 - Personal Services (574,223) (476,200) 83%(429,133) (47,067) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (269,839) (309,709) 115%(305,739) (3,969) 6400:6599 - Commodities (6,570) (13,326) 203%(4,947) (8,379) 6800:6899 - Central Services (267,380) (263,570) 99%(253,823) (9,747) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (500) (536) 107%(537) 1 TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES (1,118,512) (1,063,341) 95%(994,180) (69,161) OCCUPANCY EXPENSES (5861,5841,5821) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (110,840) (97,901) 88%(130,003) 32,102 6400:6599 - Commodities (18,115) (17,781) 98%(16,224) (1,557) 6901:6999 - Depreciation (94,000) (100,675) 107%(108,185) 7,510 TOTAL OCCUPANCY EXPENSES (222,955) (216,357) 97%(254,412) 38,055 SELLING EXPENSES (5862,5842,5822) 6000:6099 - Personal Services (970,601) (1,098,441) 113%(1,060,973) (37,469) 6100:6299 - Contractual Services (146,200) (115,077) 79%(149,521) 34,444 6400:6599 - Commodities (50,347) (42,517) 84%(45,953) 3,436 TOTAL SELLING EXPENSES (1,167,148) (1,256,036) 108%(1,256,447) 412 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES (2,508,615) (2,535,733) 101%(2,505,039) (30,695) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)642,260 1,015,405 158%807,406 207,999 Liquor Fund Revenues and Expenses As of December 31, 2017 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 13 Utility Fund Revenues: 2017 revenues of $22.4M exceeded prior year of $19.9M and budget of $20.8M by $2.5M and 1.6M, respectively. Versus the prior year, increase in Sale of Water, Sewer Charges, and Storm Sewer Charges make up $668k of the increase due to an increase in rates. $1.2M of the increase is attributable to Water Rec Fee and Sewer Rec Fee for new construction connection charges. Intergovernmental charges within the Storm Sewer Fund represent state funding. Expenses: Total Operating Expense for 2017 is $16.7M versus $16.2M for the prior year and $16.1M annual budget. Increase in expense year over year is due to an increase in Depreciation associated with addition of half a year of depreciation expense for projects completed in 2016. Contractual Services in total are up $43k where the increase in Contractual Services in the Storm Sewer Fund is offset by the decrease in Contractual Services in the Water/Sewer Fund. In 2016, the Water/Sewer fund expensed $490k for the water tower rehab project. In 2017, the Storm Sewer Fund incurred professional service cost for storm water modeling updates. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update December 2017 (Unaudited) 14 Dec YTD Budget 2017 Dec YTD Actual 2017 % of Budget 2017 Dec YTD Actual 2016 Fav/ (Unfav) OPERATING REVENUE Water/Sewer Fund (5900) Intergovernmental - 1,208 177,692 (176,484) Charges for Services (1,662) 16,510 (18,172) Sale of Water 7,213,719 6,774,422 94%6,558,578 215,844 Sale of Water Meters 31,000 50,896 164%48,458 2,438 Penalties 174,691 87,662 50%85,543 2,119 State Health Charge 122,987 88,269 72%88,271 (2) Sewer Charges 8,748,685 8,465,891 97%8,197,120 268,771 Water Rec Fee 513,600 1,305,540 254%493,000 812,540 Sewer Rec Fee 256,800 652,770 254%246,875 405,895 Certification Fee 15,000 10,890 73%11,550 (660) Other Revenue - 11,042 9,305 1,737 Total Water/Sewer Fund (5900)17,076,482 17,446,928 102%15,932,902 1,514,026 Storm Sewer Fund (5930)- Intergovernmental 904,201 25,000 879,201 Charges for Services 32,501 30,051 2,450 Penalties 14,784 16,566 112%15,747 819 Storm Sewer Charges 3,222,289 3,516,000 109%3,332,458 183,542 Other Revenue - 31,700 (31,700) Total Storm Sewer Fund (5930)3,237,073 4,469,268 138%3,434,956 1,034,312 Recycling Fund (5950)- Intergovernmental 112,000 138,334 124%142,405 (4,071) Penalties 2,000 2,736 137%2,501 235 Recycling Charges 365,000 346,739 95%336,678 10,061 Total Recycling Fund (5950)479,000 487,809 102%481,585 6,224 TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 20,792,555 22,404,004 108%19,849,443 2,554,562 OPERATING EXPENSE Water/Sewer Fund (5900) Personal Services (1,791,560) (1,682,770) 94%(1,763,347) 80,577 Contractual Services (6,879,557) (7,054,353) 103%(7,303,694) 249,340 Commodities (961,100) (742,481) 77%(768,320) 25,839 Central Services (702,436) (674,695) 96%(643,114) (31,580) Depreciation (3,274,500) (3,534,142) 108%(3,239,886) (294,256) Total Water/Sewer Fund (5900)(13,609,153) (13,688,441) 101%(13,718,361) 29,920 Storm Sewer Fund (5930) Personal Services (288,506) (470,173) 163%(441,519) (28,654) Contractual Services (276,500) (498,714) 180%(304,356) (194,358) Commodities (152,100) (156,557) 103%(70,667) (85,890) Depreciation (1,225,000) (1,394,242) 114%(1,191,746) (202,496) Total Storm Sewer Fund (5930)(1,942,106) (2,519,686) 130%(2,008,288) (511,398) Recycling Fund (5950) Personal Services (47,393) (41,800) 88%(39,722) (2,078) Contractual Services (448,965) (458,221) 102%(446,297) (11,924) Commodities (3,500) (2,443) 70%(2,161) (282) Central Services (7,866) (7,695) 98%(7,383) (312) Total Recycling Fund (5950)(507,724) (510,158) 100%(495,563) (14,595) TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSE (16,058,983) (16,718,286) 104%(16,222,213) (496,073) OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)4,733,572 5,685,719 120%3,627,230 2,058,489 Utilities Fund Revenue and Expenses As of December 31, 2017 Date: May 15, 2018 Agenda Item #: XI I I. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk Item Activity: Subject:S chedule of Meetings and Events as of May 15, 2018 Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Schedule of Meetings and Events as of May 15, 2018 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF MAY 15, 2018 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues May 15 Work Session: Edina Public Schools Superintendent Dr. John Schultz 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting: Energy & Environment Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur May 24 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon May 28 MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Tues June 5 Joint Meeting: Transportation Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting: Community Health Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur June 14 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues June19 Joint Meeting: Hyman Rights & Relations Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session: City Enterprises 6:15 P.M., COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur June 28 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed July 4 Edina’s Fourth of July Parade – Starts behind Edina City Hall 10:00 A,M, Thur July 12 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 17 Work Session: 50th & France 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Capital Improvement Plan 2019-2023 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues July 31 City Council Candidate Filing Opens 8:00 A.M. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE