HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-06-19 City Council Regular Meeting PacketAgenda
City Council Meeting
City of Edina, Minnesota
City Cou n cil Cham be rs
Tuesday, June 19, 2018
7:00 PM
I.Call To Order
II.Roll Call
III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda
IV.Community Comment
During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents
to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the
past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future
consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three
minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same
issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that
are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during
Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or
Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council
might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting.
V.Adoption Of Consent Agenda
All a genda items listed on the consent agenda are considered
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed
from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such
cases the item will be remov ed from the Consent Agenda and
considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent
Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members
present to approve.)
A.Approve Minutes: Work Session of June 5, 2018 and Regular
Meeting of June 5, 2018
B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 05/31/2018
TOTAL: $1,125,591.67, Pre-List Dated 06/07/2018 TOTAL:
$1,904,194.22 And Credit Card Transactions 03/27/2018-
04/25/2018 TOTAL: $41,868.50
C.Request for Purchase: Microsoft Enterprise Agreement
D.Request for Purchase: One 2018 Marked Police Vehicle
E.Request for Purchase: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Software Selection Consultant
F.Request for Purchase: DARTS Circulator Bus Service
G.Approve Master Agreement for Professional Engineering
Services with Wenck Associates Inc.
H.Request for Purchase: 2018 Stormwater Projects
I.Approve Development Contract for Edina Flats
J.Resolution No. 2018-52 Supporting Hennepin County's Vernon
Avenue Bridge Regional Solicitation
K.Approve TraEc Safety Report of May 1, 2018
L.Energy & Environment Commission Appointment
M.Accept Public Easement from 3948 Market Street
VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations
A.Accept Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) For Year
Ended December 31, 2017
B.Speak Up, Edina!: On-Street Parking
VII.Public Hearings
During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony
after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to
testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your
testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all
speakers and to allow the eEcient conduct of a public hearing,
speakers must observe the following guidelines:
Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor
may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks
or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the
matter under consideration.
In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in
attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any
other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed.
A.PUBLIC HEARING: Moderna Kouzina, LLC, DBA Moderna Kouzina
New On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sale Liquor
Licenses
B.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution Nos. 2018-54 & 2018-55, and
Ordinance No 2018-9; Comprehensive Plan Amendment,
Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary
Development Plan for Pentagon Park North for Pentagon
Revival LLC.
VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council
Members present to approve except where noted)
A.Sketch Plan Review: 4532 France Avenue
B.2018-2019 Student Commission Appointments
C.Resolution No. 2018-53: Accepting Various Grants & Donations
IX.Correspondence And Petitions
A.Correspondence
B.Minutes
X.Aviation Noise Update
XI.Mayor And Council Comments
XII.Manager's Comments
XIII.Schedule of Meetings and Events as of June 19, 2018
XIV.Adjournment
The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public
proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampliMc ation, an
interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861
72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting.
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
Minutes
F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Minutes : Work S es s ion of June 5, 2018 and
R egular Meeting of June 5, 2018
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve M inutes as presented.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Draft Minutes of June 5, 2018 Work Session Meeting
Draft Minutes of June 5, 2018 Regular Meeting
MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 2018
5:30 P.M.
Mayor Jim Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Answering roll call were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart and Mayor Hovland.
Edina City staff attending the meeting were: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communication and Technology
Services, Director; Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator; Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator;
Casey Casella, City Management Fellow; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director;
; Scott Neal, City Manager; Mark Nolan, Transportation Planner; and Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager.
JOINT MEETING: EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Transportation Commissioners attending the meeting included: Mindy Ahler, Vice Chair, Kirk Johnson,
Bocar Kane, Bruce McCarthy, Larry Olson, and Lori Richman, Chair.
Chair Richman and the Commissioners gave a report on the Commissions progress on its 2018 Work
Plan. It was noted that the Edina Transportation Committee would be meeting with the Richfield
Commission. The Commission reported that the City has begun a joint traffic study with Edina Public
Schools and they will report to the Council when the study results become available. In addition, the
Commission has completed its review of the Comprehensive Plan Update and gave the data to staff to
draft it. Staff reported that there was a plan being developed with Three Rivers Parks to take care of snow
removal of the Regional Trail. The Commission and Council briefly discuss the work plan parking lot
item: Define and implement equity criteria for Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund projects, and
integrate with the City’s Race and Equity Task Force efforts.
Planner Nolan updated the Council on Clover Ride: the circulator bus that will begin operation on June
22 and make a circular loop from the south end of Edinborough Park to Centennial Lakes to Lund’s,
Aurora, Southdale., Cub Foods, south to the Y and Target, Yorktown Continental, Common Bond Building
to Brookdale as fixed stops and with on-demand stops as time permits. Mr. Nolan explained the goal was
to make one loop in an hour with five loops proposed on Fridays the day the bus will operate in Edina. If
the driver drops off a patron the driver will make sure to pick them up during one of the five loops.
Estimated ride cost be $3.00, but if a patron cannot pay the fare they can still ride and pay the next time.
City staff will be doing the marketing and will be seeking sponsors to cover the $25,000 annual costs. Staff
will report on the circulator after its begun operations.
JOINT MEETING: EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION
Health Commissions attending were: Amanda Herr, Britta Orr, Chair, Alison Pence, Vice Chair, Julia
Selleys. Dena Soukup and Student Commissioner Om Jahagirdar.
Vice Chair Pence gave an update on the Edina Public Schools mental health initiative. She noted the
increases in staff of mental health professionals in the schools, that next year the third, sixth and ninth
grades will take a social emotional survey and that the District’s goal was to build a continuum of services
for mental health within the district.
Edina City Council Work Session/June 5, 2018
The Commission informed the Council of their work on the public health portion of the Comprehensive
Plan update. They discussion methods of gathering data to be able to make better-informed decisions and
possible items for the 2019 Work Plan.
RENTAL HOUSING LICENSE UPDATE
Mr. Brown gave a brief update on the development of a rental housing licensing program.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:02 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, June 19, 2018.
_____________________________________________
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Page 1
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 5, 2018
7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:09 p.m.
II. ROLLCALL
Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland.
III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED
Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, approving the meeting agenda
as presented.
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT
Frank Lorenz, 7151 York Avenue South, shared a statement about municipal governments attempting to
accomplish everything at once and how providing affordable housing in conflict with management of historic
preservation results in higher cost housing.
David Frankel, Edina, commented on the need to increase safety in public schools and requested increased
police presence at Edina public schools by four additional police officers.
V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED
Member Brindle a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, approving the consent agenda as
presented:
V.A. Approve minutes of May 15, 2018, Work Session meeting and May 15, 2018, Regular
Council meeting
V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on pre-list dated May 10,
2018, and consisting of 22 pages: General Fund $185,200.57, Pedestrian and Cyclist
Safety $3,780.00, Working Capital Fund $9,938.84, PIR Construction Fund $8,290.00,
Art Center Fund $3,060.75, Golf Dome Fund $260.00, Aquatic Center Fund $599.71-,
Golf Course Fund $16,006.42, Ice Arena Fund $43,193.65, Sports Dome Fund $4,597.55,
Edinborough Park Fund $2,699.56, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $1,427.21, Liquor Fund
$80,206.83, Utility Fund $487,362.31, PSTF Agency Fund $2,812.69, Centennial TIF
District $53,106.51: Total $901,343.18; and per pre-list dated May 17, 2018, consisting
of 37 Pages: General Fund $218,462.10, Police Special Revenue $5.99, Working Capital
Fund $39,668.13, PIR Construction Fund $54,530.70, Equipment Replacement Fund
$49,460.00, Art Center Fund $3,805.50, Golf Dome Fund $2,006.40, Aquatic Center
Fund $2,216.00, Golf Course Fund $13,225.65, Ice Arena Fund $16,431.34, Sports Dome
Fund $9,851.49, Edinborough Park Fund $5,921.99, Centennial Lakes Park Fund
$11,462.45, Liquor Fund $368,279.85, Utility Fund $55,361.97, Storm Sewer Fund
$10,567.05, Recycling Fund $39,321.72, Risk Mgmt ISF $8,815.96, PSTF Agency Fund
$1,155.01, Centennial TIF District $49,050.69, Southdale 2 District $240.00, Payroll
Fund $2,853.10: Total $962,693.09; and per pre-list dated May 24, 2018, consisting of
32 Pages: General Fund $357,175.11, Police Special Revenue $375.00, General Debt
Service Fund $750.00, Working Capital Fund $3,311.15, Equipment Replacement Fund
$1,499.66, Art Center Fund $848.65, Golf Dome Fund $181.72, Aquatic Center Fund
$2,584.22, Golf Course Fund $18,063.64, Ice Arena Fund $21,066.24, Sports Dome Fund
$13,380.50, Edinborough Park Fund $6,511.98, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $9,441.30,
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 5, 2018
Page 2
Liquor Fund $155,803.49, Utility Fund $66,993.83, Storm Sewer Fund $7,622.49, Risk
Mgmt ISF $211.70, PSTF Agency Fund $1,516.89, MN Task Force 1 Fund $16,194.50,
HRA Administration $3,200.00, Centennial TIF District $66,323.82, Pentagon Park
District $18,927.50, Payroll Fund $12,913.15: Total $784,896.54
V.C. Approve Second Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement with Edina Market
Street, LLC
V.D. Adopt Resolution 2018-49; Supporting Affordably-Priced Housing at 4100 West 76th
Street and Receptivity to Metropolitan Council Funding
V.E. Adopt Resolution No. 2018-52; Authorizing Edina Liquor On-Sale Distillery for
Charitable Event June 25, 2018 at Centennial Lakes
V.F. Adopt Ordinance 2018-08: Boards, Committees, Commissions Student Membership
City Code Section 2-80
V.G. Approve Second Amendment to Lease: Hornets Nest
V.H. Receive Response to Creek Knoll A Neighborhood Petition Received May 1, 2018
V.I. Approve Revised Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy
V.J. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, GL
Contracting, Inc., ENG 18-6 France Avenue Sidewalk, $209,069.30
V.K. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Ti-
Zack Concrete, Inc., ENG 18-10 Valley View Sidewalk Phase 1, $349,232.25
V.L. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, SEH,
Inc., York Avenue Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension Planning, $49,353.00
V.M. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder,
Bolton & Menk, Inc., Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation, $72,616.00
V.N. Approve Parks and Recreation Commission Work Plan Addition
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
Manager Neal introduced Management Fellow Intern Casey Casella who described her education and
background. Ms. Casella told the Council she was excited to learn about the City.
VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
VI.A. SPEAK UP, EDINA: MUNICIPAL TREE SALES – PRESENTED
Senior Communications Coordinator Eidsness outlined the public engagement process used to gather
information on municipal tree sales. Ms. Eidsness presented a summary of comments, requests, and
suggestions received and shared the next Speak Up, Edina topic would be on-street parking followed by a
summer break.
VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file.
VII.A. REZONING AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PENTAGON PARK SOUTH,
4815 AND 4901 77TH STREET AND 7710 COMPUTER AVENUE FOR SOLOMON REAL
ESTATE GROUP – ORDINANCE NO. 2018-11 FIRST READING GRANTED – RESOLUTION
NO. 2018-50 – ADOPTED
Community Development Director Presentation
Community Development Director Teague said Solomon Real Estate Group was requesting a rezoning from
MDD-6 to PUD-17 to develop the vacant 12.5-acre Pentagon South Parcel (4900 77th Street). The first
phase would include 11,800 square feet of retail space, a 193-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking
ramp with a second phase that included two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp and 19,000 square feet
of office/retail. Mr. Teague stated at full development build out, the project would include 225,000 square
feet of office space, 2 hotels (346 rooms), 30,800 square feet of retail and two parking structures with a total
of 1,545 spaces. He reviewed changes that resulted from sketch plan review that included eliminating the
drive-thru, increased setbacks on Viking Drive and Computer Drive, and combined parking structures with
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 5, 2018
Page 3
the building. Mr. Teague described the phasing and explained the primary issue was if the proposal was
reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning, noting the Planning Commission approved the project 8-1. He
outlined justification included improved pedestrian connections, high-quality building and design, public
parking, public art, and economic vitality.
Chuck Rickert, WSB Associates, responded to the Council’s questions relating to reasons the PUD was a
better zoning fit and transportation improvements needed for this project. Mr. Rickert said a mitigation plan
for the entire area was determined that included both the north and south phases after review of
environmental impacts and additional turn lanes would be needed at the main intersection off 77th Avenue
as well as review of signal system timing from Highway 100 to these intersections.
Applicant Presentation
Scott Tankenoff, property owner, shared that Pentagon Park was a challenged and blighted area and he was
excited to bring a project that provided transition for best uses. He thanked City staff for their work on
this project.
Christina Smitten, Hillcrest Development, explained the project of six existing buildings, four of which were
currently vacant, would bring a complementary mix of uses that would be market viable and begin
transformation of the area.
Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate Group, introduced his team and thanked the City for its consideration.
Bill Wittrock, RSP Architects, said the project was created with Edina’s design guidelines in mind. It created
several open spaces, aligned front doors with visibility to art and greenspace, connected pathways and green
streets, incorporated water elements, shared parking, and an extensive pedestrian-friendly network with
bike trail connections and strong connections to the park across street. He shared the proposed tree plan
and artistic developed zone with seating and architectural edge to tie buildings together.
The Council referred to the parking structure’s base and inquired about its effects on more than parking.
Mr. Wittrock agreed the ground level needed work with pedestrian access and explained they would address
ground points on the streetscape.
Mr. Scott pointed out the lobby feature in front of the parking garage, stating access to the hotel and street
level would be highlighted with pavers, crossings, and artwork that would be inviting but not the quickest
path for travel. Mr. Scott responded to the Council’s inquiries about Centennial Lakes-type greenway
connectivity north to south and plans to connect to the park and regional trail. He said they wanted to
make an inviting entrance and were committed to get people to the park once the City created appropriate,
safe crossings.
The Council stressed the importance of internal streets; how Viking Street on the south side needed to be
inviting, inquired about the metal skin building material, and long-term maintenance. Council Members
commented on the master plan versus individual projects and the importance of keeping as much life on the
street as possible. Mr. Wittrock agreed some metals do not perform well over time but said this material
was quite durable.
Prince Bhakta, JR Hospitality, a locally-based company, expressed excitement about the development. He
explained that dual-branding provided both extended and daily-stay concepts utilizing shared guest amenities
of a pool, fitness center, and conference room between the hotels.
Steve Lavan, Design Partners and franchisee for WaterWalk, described their developed corporate lodging
concept that provided longer term stays with 1-3-bedroom units for business travelers, transition stays for
corporate housing, and families during home transition such as construction.
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 5, 2018
Page 4
Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:06 p.m.
Public Testimony
Judy Halper, 4437 Rutledge Avenue, addressed the Council.
Tom Fletcher, 4445 W. 70th Street, Suite 170, addressed the Council.
Mark Peterson, 7330 Gallagher Drive, addressed the Council.
Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing.
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland.
Motion carried.
Mr. Teague responded to tree concerns raised during public testimony, stating additional trees could be
required and addressed now or later, noting that while City Code required 50 overstory the applicant was
proposing 150 trees.
In response to Council’s inquiries about stormwater management and timing of city street improvement
projects, Engineering Director Millner referred to environmental and development scenarios and explained
some would require full street reconstruction while others would not require full reconstruction.
The Council applauded the design work but stressed the importance of parking and asked if the project was
under parked. Mr. Rickart said the 1,400 parking stalls was sufficient due to shared parking and projected
times of day and proposed use. Mr. Rickart said public parking was in the parking calculations. Mr. Teague
said this site was not considered for public parking which would be addressed on the site to the north. Mr.
Solomon assured the Council that parking was sufficient but since some would expect parking close to
restaurants, he requested restricted parking.
The Council shared photographs of bike rack concepts and raised roundabouts to separate pedestrians and
bicyclists from vehicle traffic, noting this was a gateway into the City. Council Members commented on
sustainability and Hennepin County’s goals of 75% recycling and zero waste by 2030 that included
restaurants; final landscape plan and the desire for increased greenspace as an additional condition to increase
overstory trees where appropriate and the challenge to turn lanes on 77th and Computer Avenues; future
desire to park near restaurants; and, suggested unrestricted parking. Mr. Teague said that would be difficult
to enforce but suggested preventing signage from being posted. Mr. Scott requested reasonable minimum
restrictions for uses such as to-go parking for restaurants.
Attorney Knutson said the term ‘reasonable’ would be difficult to enforce and suggested a percentage
instead. Mr. Teague requested the correction of the term ‘subdivision’ by replacing it with ‘preliminary plat’
throughout the resolution. Member Staunton made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance
No. 2018-11, amending the Zoning Ordinance to establish the PUD-17, Planned Unit
Development-17 Zoning District, and introduced and moved adoption of Resolution 2018-50
approving Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17,
Planned Unit Development – 17, including a Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1 and a
preliminary plat for Solomon Real Estate Group based on the following conditions as amended:
1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary
Development Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the
Planning Commission.
2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter
36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 5, 2018
Page 5
submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required
landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit.
3. The exterior treatment on the parking garage facing the internal street must be matched
on the exterior of the parking garage that faces Bloomington.
4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the
City Code.
5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code.
6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require
revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements.
7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval.
8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated
May 3, 2018.
9. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations including:
A. Addition of a northbound left turn lane, southbound striped left turn lane and eastbound
right turn lane at 77th Street and Commercial Access driveway.
B. Addition of a northbound dual left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street
and Computer Avenue.
10. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th
Street is required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the
applicant/landowner is responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans
would be subject to the recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city
engineer.
11. All crosswalks shall be marked with “duraprint” type stamping, or whatever is the city
standard at the time of installation, to clearly identify the pedestrian crossings.
12. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the
automobile parking space requirement.
13. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-17, Planned Unit
Development for this site.
14. Compliance with the recommendation in the city’s sustainability coordinator’s memo
dated May 9, 2018.
15. Applicant to work with the City Forester to create a landscape plan to add additional trees
and greenspace where possible.
16. Applicant to ensure that 90% of surface parking be unrestricted.
Member Fischer seconded the motion.
The Council noted the possibility of TIF in the future to enhance public infrastructure to make pedestrian
access as strong as possible.
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS – (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to
approve except where noted).
VIII.A. AWARDING THE SALE OF $5,780,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2018A –
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-51 ADOPTED
Finance Director Uram stated bonds were being issued by the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes and
would not count against the City's debt limit. He shared the City’s AAA bond rating history and outlined
the credit strengths and challenges, fund balance, and liquidity. Mr. Uram shared the bonds would be used
for local street, water utility, storm utility, and sanitary sewer improvements and would be paid back through
special assessments and various revenues over a 10-year period.
The Council asked questions regarding debt perspective and thanked the team for their work. Nick Anhut,
Ehlers and Associates, said their report focused on primary debt matrix and overlapping debt such as school
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 5, 2018
Page 6
districts, noting the City had no control over items such as PERA. He shared results which included six bids
with the low bid from Baird at 2.7%. He referred to the re-offering premium possibility and stated closing
would occur at the end of the month. Mr. Anhut said the short-term rates might increase based on the
current economy. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-
51 Authorizing Issuance, Awarding Sale, Prescribing the Form and Details and Providing for
the Payment of $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A. Member Stewart seconded
the motion.
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.B. AMEND CITY CODE CONCERNING LIMITED PARKING ZONES – ORDINANCE NO. 2018-
10 ADOPTED
Mr. Neal shared that Council requested amendments to City Code to allow staff the ability to make
temporary changes to limited parking zones including public parking ramps. He said the current language
required adoption of a resolution by City Council and the ordinance was drafted by Attorney Knutson.
The Council indicated this was suggested to allow more flexibility for temporary changes than an ordinance
allowed and clarified the maximum parking limit was six hours but the ordinance would allow the parking
limit to vary in special circumstances. Member Stewart made a motion to grant First reading and
waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2018-10, amending Chapter 26 of the Edina
City Code concerning limited parking zones. Member Fischer seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland
Motion carried.
VIII.C. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY REZONING WITH
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FRANCE EQUITIES LLC, 7250 FRANCE
AVENUE – RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 ADOPTED DENYING REQUEST– ORDINANCE NO.
2018-09 AND RESOLUTION 2018-48 NOT ADOPTED
Community Development Director Presentation
Mr. Teague said this item was continued from the May 15, 2018, Council meeting after the public hearing
was closed. He reviewed the three options available to Council regarding the request included: denial of
the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan; approval of
the Comprehensive Plan Amendment for just the 7250 France Avenue site; Preliminary Rezoning and
Preliminary Development Plan; or, approval of the Comprehensive Plan, Preliminary Rezoning and
Preliminary Development Plan as originally recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. He noted
existing cellular antennas would be provided a temporary pole while any new building was constructed and
if approved, the applicant would work with the property owner to the north to accomplish that relocation.
The Council shared comments regarding how Southdale Mall was constructed 60 years ago as a Town
Center surrounded by neighborhoods including multi-family and towers but it did not materialize as
envisioned without the housing. The Council explained how retail had evolved and commented on resident
input regarding height and density in the Comprehensive Plan process and the importance of retaining
neighborhood character. The Council spoke about the creation of a developer panel to address economics
and how current tear-down homes never result in the same housing type but were all larger because of
economics and taller developments makes sense in some locations as it freed up land space. The Council
clarified how uses created traffic, not building heights, and the need for a more nuanced approach on
transition in order to make the best decision for the community. The Council spoke about the work of the
Southdale Area Working Group as well as the long-time property owner to resolve some of the City’s
issues, adding the City cannot tell owners when to develop or to develop at the same time. The Council
expressed confidence in the County’s replacement of curb cuts and the benefits of affordable housing but
suggested the mezzanine be removed and the number of stores reduced to five on the west side.
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 5, 2018
Page 7
The Council shared concerns about the length of time between the public hearing and a decision on the
project and commented on the importance of public trust. Council Members shared comments on how the
west side was not as engaged, the tunnel-like feeing that could better engage pedestrians and cyclists, and
cautioned against redesigning at this point.
The Council thanked the neighborhood for the dialogue and encouraged the Southdale Working Group to
complete their work as it was difficult to make development decisions otherwise. The Council
acknowledged the building needed replacement as it would be condemned soon for safety reasons and
commented on the recession and current high property values. The Council noted there were many issues
common to these sites and the Cedars of Edina and commented on how one site affected adjacent sites so
they should be developed together. The Council suggested not including affordable housing in a high-end
project as one way to reduce height and to make them companion buildings with affordable housing in one,
which alleviated a single access point into two developments.
The Council shared the importance of balancing potential adverse effects on a neighborhood with the overall
benefit to the community. The Council noted the Comprehensive Plan was a guide and commented on the
give to get principle which would result in additional public realm, greenspace, enhanced nearby access, and
connectivity. The Council explained approval would not result in a precedent at the 7200 building and would
create a very sophisticated storm water management system for future plans. It was explained how a medical
building would generate more traffic while this project offered improved quality of life for the neighborhood
with Fred Richards Park, trail and retail and restaurant access without having to cross France Avenue. The
Council also commented on the importance of the greater Southdale area as an asset for the neighborhoods
to the west and the need for a broad community discussion on transition as the City’s job was to recognize
that growth would occur and then manage that growth by creating appropriate infrastructure.
Member Fischer introduced and moved and adoption of Resolution No. 2018-47 approving a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density in the OR Office Residential District for
7250 France Avenue with conditions to limit to five stories on the west side and no mezzanine
on France Avenue. Mayor Hovland seconded the motion.
Roll call:
Ayes: Fischer, Hovland
Nays: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart
Motion failed.
Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-47 seconded by
Member Brindle denying a Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density in the OR
Office Residential District and Preliminary Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District to
PUD-15, Planned Unit Development – 15, including Preliminary Development Plan for 7250
France Avenue per findings outlined in the Resolution as follows:
1. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is not appropriate at this time as the City
is currently considering the density in the transition area west of France as part of the 2018
Comprehensive Plan update.
2. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the 2008 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed development does not provide an adequate transition to the west.
4. The density proposed is too high for this area.
5. This area will be studied closer as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update.
The applicant inquired about withdrawing the application. Mr. Neal explained if withdrawn, the applicant
could continue to work and refine the project for further Council consideration but if denied, it would
prohibit another application for one year unless the applicant brought forward a plan that was substantially
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 5, 2018
Page 8
different. The Council discussed what would be substantial changes in order to reconsider after which the
motion maker and seconder indicated an unwillingness to withdraw their motion for denial.
Roll call:
Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart
Nays: Fischer, Hovland
Motion carried.
IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS
IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE
Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence.
IX.B. MINUTES
1. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION APRIL 12, 2018
2. HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 10, 2018
3. PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 25, 2018
4. HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION APRIL 24, 2018
Informational; no action required.
X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received
XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received
XI.A. RACE AND EQUITY TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT FOLLOW-UP
Mayor Hovland said the City recently met regarding the recent Race and Equity Task Force final report that
might have included identifiers of dates and people surveyed. He explained the intent of the survey was to
encourage people to share their experiences anonymously, was an important data gathering exercise, and
not for accusation or investigation. He read into the record a letter he intended to submit to the Sun Current
that explained the decision that balanced input with a safe haven to report and asked for Council comment.
The Council commented on the need to engage the community in order to have people share their stories
and while some believed they included identifiers, it was inadvertent and a small number but leaving as
described could do a disservice. The Council discussed alternatives that included removal of identifiers to
generalize or inclusion of a foreword; not redacting information; and, intent to leave stories in place but to
protect identities and the mission of the report. The Council stated this was the beginning of the process,
must engage efforts together, and cautioned about re-writing the report without including the Task Force.
Mr. Neal shared an example of generalization of a comment that could address concerns and convey a less
specific reference but still show intent. The Council noted no corroboration of the event was included and
concluded that generalization should be done where needed and to include a foreword to convey that stories
shared were respected. The Council commented on how too much specificity could create more
divisiveness and its desire for a community united to move forward.
XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received
XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF JUNE 5, 2018 – Received
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at
11:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Minutes/Edina City Council/June 5, 2018
Page 9
Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 19, 2018.
James B. Hovland, Mayor
Video Copy of the June 5, 2018, meeting available.
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
C laims
F rom:Don Uram, F inance Director
Item Activity:
Subject:R eceive P ayment of C laims As P er: P re-Lis t Dated
05/31/2018 TO TAL: $1,125,591.67, P re-List Dated
06/07/2018 TO TAL: $1,904,194.22 And C redit C ard
Transac tions 03/27/2018-04/25/2018 TO TAL:
$41,868.50
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve claims for payment.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
C laim information for approval is attached.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 05/31/2018 TOTAL: $1,125,591.67
Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 06/07/2018 TOTAL: $1,904,194.22
Credit Card Transactions 03/27/2018-04/25/2018 TOTAL: $41,868.50
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page- 1
Business Unit
6476 5/31/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
156.24 461678 2234952 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
180.30 461711 2239048 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
165.72 461557 2239050 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
38.14 461524 2239054 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
540.40
6477 5/31/2018 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
449.57 COFFEE - FIRE 461636 11322473 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
449.57
6478 5/31/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
361.19 461414 64166500 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
161.55 461673 64166600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
822.48 461676 64235600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,733.45 461672 64236200 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,386.43 461709 64333800 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
860.00 461494 64333900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
134.97 461674 97626400 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
211.25 461708 97660200 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
6,671.32
6479 5/31/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
121.08 PW SUPPLIES 461365 139347 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
81.86 PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES 461617 139530 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
202.94
6480 5/31/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS
32.46 BINS 461565 0E-480797-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
72.46 LABELS 461565 0E-480797-1 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION
17.87 FILE POCKETS 461567 OE-480913-1 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
14.72 461522 WO-383396-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING
68.99 461520 WO-383411-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING
18.34 461523 WO-383923-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING
224.84
6481 5/31/2018 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON
13,639.18 LEGAL SERVICES 461571 2851-015G 97 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY
13,639.18
6482 5/31/2018 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 — 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page - 2
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
6482 5/31/2018 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIPMENT Continued...
511.12 GAS MONITOR SUPPLIES 461375 177184 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
511.12
6483 5/31/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO
790.00 461677 67-4035 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
790.00
6484 5/31/2018 104020 DALCO
813.42 PARKS SUPPLIES 461364 3319019 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
813.42
6485 5/31/2018 134730 EXPLORE EDINA
33,818.92 APRIL LODGING TAX 461720 052518 1001.4030 LODGING TAX GENERAL FUND REVENUES
33,818.92
6486 5/31/2018 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURING
1,619.52 PAINT 461745 121002 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE
1,619.52
6487 5/31/2018 129508 IMPACT
458.57 LATE NOTICES 461562 132900 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
458.57
6488 5/31/2018 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
44.21 CARWASH PART 461618 INV038934 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING
44.21
6489 5/31/2018 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC.
564.08 PPE ALTERATION 461630 248143 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
798.92 PPE ALTERATION 461631 248144 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,363.00
6490 5/31/2018 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC.
151.50 OPEN HOUSE 461751 130900 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL
151.50
6491 5/31/2018 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI
7,791.32 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 1160.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT FINANCE
142.84 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5110.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
109.88 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5210.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page- 3
Business Unit
6491 5/31/2018 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI Continued..
188.88 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5310.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT POOL ADMINISTRATION
297.40 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5410.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
534.33 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5510.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT ARENA ADMINISTRATION
148.18 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5552.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION
336.51 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5710.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
220.57 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5760.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
410.64 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5820.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT 50TH STREET GENERAL
940.23 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5860.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,070.20 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5840.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
2,892.31 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5902.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE
416.71 2017 AUDIT 461721 44559 5932.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT GENERAL STORM SEWER
15,500.00
6492 5/31/2018 101483 MENARDS
79.88- CREDIT MEMO 461398 068277 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
35.96 LUMBER 461437 68279 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
45.48 461347 68411 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY
5.67 PLUMBING PARTS 461442 68423 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
13.94 SUPPLIES 461587 68759 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
21.41 DROP CLOTH 461581 68828 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
135.36 MAILBOX POST MATERIAL 461580 68912 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
177.94
6493 5/31/2018 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
147.10 NAPKINS 461441 14303 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
157.25 TISSUE, PAPER TOWELS 461441 14303 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
788.64 FOAMY CLEANER, SOAP, LINERS 461441 14303 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
1,092.99
6494 5/31/2018 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
1,297.20 ST 1. & 2 RPZ REPAIR 461432 73827 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
394.10 RPZ REPAIR STA.1 461433 73828 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,691.30
6495 5/31/2018 101015 STREICHERS
128.49 BALLISTIC VEST CARRIER 461351 11315129 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
128.49
6496 5/31/2018 103277 TITAN MACHINERY
114.11 BLADE 461383 10866989 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 4
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 -
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
6496
6497
5/31/2018 103277 TITAN MACHINERY
119454 VINOCOPIA
Continued...
5/31/2018
114.11
93.58 461589 0207009 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
125.00 461590 02070104 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
340.00 461710 207489 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
489.00 461556 20749 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
129.00 461553 207490 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
91.50 461554 207491 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
489.00 461526 207493-IN 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
161.50 461555 207523 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,918.58
6498 5/31/2018 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION
405.35 CONCESSIONS FOOD 461534 51791577 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
405.35
6499 5/31/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
2,006.72 461573 71538 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
906.85 461404 72241 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
715.55 461479 72242 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,708.75 461572 72260 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
5,337.87
424939 5/31/2018 142327 56 BREWING, LLC
160.00 461679 5602363 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
186.00 461578 5602392 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
210.00 461716 5602393 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
308.00 461592 5602394 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
864.00
424940 5/31/2018 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY
206.00 461574 E-6204 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
410.00 461689 E-6285 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
297.50 461459 E-6286 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
302.50 461493 E-6287 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,216.00
424941 5/31/2018 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
163.90 CARIBOU COFFEE 461429 71583 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 5
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424941
424942
5/31/2018 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
141768 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC.
Continued...
5/31/2018
163.90
188.36 PUMP 461741 10928371 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
188.36
424943 5/31/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
18.89 WALL CLOCK 461443 166Q-Y6Y4-GHGW 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
33.95 KEYBOARD FOR PLANDE 461424 1DH9-DGPH-VFMP 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
21.76 SMART STRAW 461727 1DYV-QJH1-9MK6 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
56.67 WALL CLOCK FOR POOL 461736 1DYV-QJH1-NYNN 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
92.85 3 FOOTRESTS FOR OFFICE 461724 1KJL-R9DN-4HKJ 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
18.89- CREDIT FOR WALL CLOCK 461738 1KQ1-V1P9-WF7D 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
13.99 PHONE HOLDER 461726 1RPD-RQ96-113Q 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
157.96 60TH RUBBER DUCKIES 461434 1W7N-RDFG-GVR7 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION
335.90 2 TRIKES FOR GYM 461435 1VV7N-RDFG-LPC1 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
119.38 2 OSCILLATING FANS 461436 1VV7N-RDFG-M71X 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
36.52 461722 1VVTY-99CT-KKTJ 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
868.98
424944 5/31/2 018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC.
217.03 461366 1004139100 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL
141.60 461754 1004146953 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY
125.32 LAUNDRY 461632 1004149134 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
483.95
424945 5/31/2018 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY
750.00 COPY PAPER 461566 10553059-00 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
750.00
424946 5/31/2018 142531 ANDERSON, EDWARD
159.88 REFUND FOR B-DAY PARTY CHARGE 461627 15988 5701.4557 BIRTHDAY RENTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES
159.88
424947 5/31/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
2,179.00 461568 3264584 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
204.50 461714 3264585 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
204.50 461519 3264586 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,065.00 461715 3264587 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,688.50 461518 3264588 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL Page- 6
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 -
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424947 5/31/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued...
26.12- 461490 422324 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,493.70 461681 8282771 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
12,809.08
424948 5/31/2018 106304 ASPEN MILLS
298.95 VEST CARRIER 461536 216321 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
298.95
424949 5/31/2018 138681 AVOLVE SOFTWARE CORP.
15,873.75 UPGRADE SOFTWARE FOR P-REVIEW 461634 4348 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS
15,873.75
424950 5/31/2018 102195 BATTERIES PLUS
116.36 461733 P1651512 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION
116.36
424951 5/31/2018 100645 BEACON ATHLETICS
308.00 GOAL PARTS 461742 0488032-IN 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
308.00
424952 5/31/2018 120517 BEITEL, DAWN
294.08 JAN-APRIL MILEAGE DAWN 461756 05242018 5710.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
294.08
424953 5/31/2018 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.
390.00 PIZZA 461728 4754235 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
156.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 461531 4754242 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
468.00 PIZZA 461735 4755125 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
1,014.00
424954 5/31/2018 125139 BERNICK'S
20.00 461657 426206 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
445.72 461482 427588 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
60.00 461685 427721 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,017.20 461687 427722 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
60.00 461498 427725 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,395.50 461499 427726 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,998.42
424955 5/31/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC.
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page - 7
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424955 5/31/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. Continued-.
315.00 461658 2366 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
315.00
424956 5/31/2018 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
1,172.83 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 461376 82871583 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,172.83
424957 5/31/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
1,195.50 461655 150900 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
135.00 461596 151069 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
395.00 461415 151070 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
412.50 461706 151211 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,018.50 461717 151212 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,159.50
424958 5/31/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS
47.04 TAILLIGHTS 461381 1229793 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
30.00- CREDIT MEMO 461382 CM1227541 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17.04
424959 5/31/2018 142532 BRAATEN, EYLEEN
79.00 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS REFUND 461628 052518 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
79.00
424960 5/31/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
2,887.84 461410 1080804397 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
43.25 461411 1080804398 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,802.65 461421 1080804399 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,835.07 461355 1080804400 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,389.52 461358 1080804401 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
6,109.78 461610 1080804402 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
132.06 461613 1080804403 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,293.24 461612 1080804474 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
18,493.41
424961 5/31/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC
7,480.10 461483 1090860204 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
127.75 461484 1090860205 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
9,030.60 461591 1090860207 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
16,638.45
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 8
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 -
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424961
424962
5/31/2018
5/31/2018
124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC
122250 BROWN, JEFF
Continued...
236.53 461346 05212018 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH
236.53
424963 5/31/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
1,525.15 461600 2108609 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
53.85 461595 2108610 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,917.65 461419 2108611 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
108.15 461418 2108612 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
6,604.80
424964 5/31/2018 141269 CAYAN
362.10 461447 651941 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL
805.00 461449 654061 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
597.10 461448 654760 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,764.20
424965 5/31/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
38.25 461541 9546705-5/18 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION
38.25
424966 5/31/2018 141762 CHIRPICH, EVAN
45.00 DECOY -ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 461594 20180523EC 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION
45.00
424967 5/31/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION
37.84 UNIFORM RENTAL 461392 4006097843 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
11.78 RENTAL UNIFORM 461391 4006097876 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
49.62
424968 5/31/2018 142530 CLANCY, CRYSTAL
100.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 461626 052318 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
100.00
424969 5/31/2018 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION
311.36 461403 3638206379 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
311.36
424970 5/31/2018 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 — 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page - 9
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424970 5/31/2018 129820 COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL Continued...
1,054.83 461729 M424-002073-JUN 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY
E
1,054.83
424971 5/31/2018 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC.
47.63 CONCRETE 461564 0169454-IN 5932.6556 TOOLS GENERAL STORM SEWER
908.80 CONCRETE 461564 0169454-IN 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER
956.43
424972 5/31/2018 116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC.
999.30 METAL CONCRETE PINS 461579 0062301900 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
999.30
424973 5/31/2018 140057 CRAFT HOMES LLC
1,875.00 REFUND APP FEE NOT DEDUCTED 461730 162432 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS
1,875.00
424974 5/31/2018 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO.
303.96 PAMELA GARAGE 461750 1804-689784 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
303.96
424975 5/31/2018 101534 DELI DOUBLE
500.00 Q2 IQS LEADERSHIP TRAIN FOOD 461606 05172018 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
500.00
424976 5/31/2018 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS
668.00 ROAD PAINT 461582 802180958 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS
668.00
424977 5/31/2018 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
1,306.66 461446 39659 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
1,306.67 461446 39659 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
1,306.67 461446 39659 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
3,920.00
424978 5/31/2018 140433 ENDANGERED RESOURCE SERVICES LLC
3,442.00 MACROPHYTE SURVEYS 461641 ERS-003-2018 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
3,442.00
424979 5/31/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 10
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 -
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424979 5/31/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued-.
57.04 CONNECTORS 461380 1-5585072 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
343.32 BATTERIES 461390 1-Z14580 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
312.06 WHEEL BEARING AND HUB ASSY 461397 69-312206 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
20.24 CONNECTORS 461384 75-301791 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
732.66
424980 5/31/2018 130136 FAUS, SUSAN
103.01 MILEAGE 461753 122418 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
103.01
424981 5/31/2018 138104 FINANGER, PHILLIP
720.00 EHS PE INSTRUCTION 461755 52418 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
720.00
424982 5/31/2018 114661 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME
142.33 REFUND 80% - JOB CANCELLED 461731 161664 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS
142.33
424983 5/31/2018 102418 GARDENSIDE LTD
3,760.00 SWINGING BENCHES 461525 28488 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
3,760.00
424984 5/31/2018 142466 GEAR WASH
2,553.51 PPE GEAR WASH & REPAIR 461537 14149 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2,553.51
424985 5/31/2018 101103 GRAINGER
14.04 OIL FOR PAINT TRUCK 461387 9794592726 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
66.22 PIPE TAP 461388 9794592734 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
11.81 BOX KNIVE 461389 9794819988 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
179.52 FILTERS 461725 9795354464 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
271.59
424986 5/31/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
866.00 461653 MN00039636 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
248.25- 461654 MN00039637 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
500.75 461609 MN00039903 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
346.50 461356 MN00039986 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,465.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 — 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page - 11
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424987 5/31/2018 142526 HANG, ELIZABETH Continued...
60.00 REFUND TENNIS 461622 052318 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
60.00
424988 5/31/2018 103835 HANRAHAN, BRIAN
47.71 NFA CLASS 461629 052418 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
53.13 NFA CLASS 461629 052418 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
100.84
424989 5/31/2018 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS
25,424.77 JUNE HP INVOICE-NONACTIVES 461529 81220449 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
262,542.76 JUNE HP INVOICE 461528 81221245 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
287,967.53
424990 5/31/2018 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG
2,268.96 OFFICE CLOSET 461521 645634 1190.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSING
2,268.96
424991 5/31/2018 142527 HIGHER GROUND ACADEMY
35.00 OVERPAYED W/CHECK-REFUND 461623 52318 5701.4541 GENERALADMISSIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES
35.00
424992 5/31/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
2,116.25 461616 964927 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,549.00 461413 964928 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,665.25
424993 5/31/2018 103932 HOPKINS POLICE DEPARTMENT
35.00 REGIONAL RESPONSE PENMAN 461757 20180529 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
35.00
424994 5/31/2018 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
236.87 CHLORINE, ACID 461723 180515109 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
4,702.00 ACCU-TABS, HYDROCHLORIC ACID 461737 180517060 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION
4,938.87
424995 5/31/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC
10.22 FILTER 461386 038046000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
19.18 FILTERS 461395 038046097 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
29.40
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL Page- 12
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 -
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424996 5/31/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY Continued...
199.00 461683 63969 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
223.62 461480 64222 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
157.50 461648 64223 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
580.12
424997 5/31/2018 100828 JERRY'S FOODS
20.36 SUPPLIES FOR CIT 461496 00363924 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
20.36
424998 5/31/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
6,456.08 461575 2809147 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
99.35 461651 2809148 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
5,869.13 461646 2809184 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,408.10 461357 2809185 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
50.40 461647 2809186 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,682.40 461401 2809187 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
21.50 461402 2809188 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
19,586.96
424999 5/31/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO,
112.44 461665 1009948 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
73.80 461666 1009957 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
38.19 461670 1009958 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
815.26 461671 1009959 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,125.80 461669 1009960 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,983.67 461667 1009961 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,739.44 461675 1009962 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,826.55 461662 1009963 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
246.38 461661 1009964 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,494.34 461660 1009965 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
800.22 461474 1015297 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,099.38 461476 1015298 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,265.95 461477 1015299 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
298.38 461460 1015300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
599.60 461702 1015301 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
103.86 461503 1015302 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
582.22 461461 1015303 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
85.19 461462 1015304 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
174.07 461467 1015305 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,734.82 461468 1015306 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page- 13
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
424999 5/31/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued...
1,987.27 461694 1015308 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,068.91 461701 1015310 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,614.76 461699 1015311 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
916.90 461703 1015312 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
5,081.32 461690 1015313 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
585.95 461697 1015314 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,682.59 461698 1015316 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
88.88 461501 1015320 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,707.73 461505 1015321 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,188.31 461512 1015322 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,588.93 461516 1015323 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
25.19 461506 1015324 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
663.12 461504 1015325 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,562.05 461508 1015326 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,111.90 461507 1015327 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,759.77 461514 1015328 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
260.47 461583 1015648 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
89.99 461577 1015649 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
94.27 461718 1015650 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
148.17 461576 1015652 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
99.57 461712 1015653 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
17.16- 461602 5871774A 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1.19- 461599 5909687A 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
7.67- 461598 5920056A 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
11.90- 461604 5930536A 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
13.43- 461495 677630 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
31.95- 461659 679239 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
10.17- 461659 679239 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
53,432.14
425000 5/31/2018 139688 KEEPSAKE CIDERY LLP
120.00 461464 EDINA5052418 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
120.00
425001 5/31/2018 141763 KNIGHT, GABRIELLE
45.00 DECOY -ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 461593 20180523GK 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION
45.00
425002 5/31/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
25,460.85 PD LOSSES FOR CLAIM 2/9/18 461530 3519 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 — 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page- 14
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425002 5/31/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Continued...
25,460.85
425003 5/31/2018 142007 LUNNEBORG, MEGAN
13.08 APRIL MILEAGE 461344 052118 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
13.08
425004 5/31/2018 141916 LUPULIN BREWING
99.00 461680 12281 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
252.00 461693 12494 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
189.00 461465 12495 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
315.00 461492 12496 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
855.00
425005 5/31/2018 100865 MAGNUSON SOD
87.00 BLACK DIRT FOR WMB RESTORATION 461370 2-209412 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION
58.00 BLACK DIRT FOR WMB RESTORATION 461369 2-209563 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION
87.00 BLACK DIRT FOR WMB RESTORATION 461371 4-329666 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION
232.00
425006 5/31/2018 142525 MALLOW, SAMANTHA
45.00 DECOY -ALCOHOL COMPLAINCE 461621 20180523SM 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION
45.00
425007 5/31/2018 142503 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC
100,476.75 CONCORD/CC/CHOWEN 1 461373 ENG 18-3 01447.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Concord A & G
PAYMENT 1
77,227.40 CONCORD/CC/CHOWEN 1 461373 ENG 18-3 05574.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Concord A/G
PAYMENT 1
177,704.15
425008 5/31/2018 100883 MESSERLI & KRAMER
5,000.00 GRGREEN LEGISLATIVE REP 461570 351526 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
1,000.00 GRGREEN LEGISLATIVE REP 461569 351527 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
6,000.00
425009 5/31/2018 134067 METRO BLOOMS
958.33 WORKSHOPS AND BLUETHUMB MEMBER 461444 RES YARDS/ALT 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
TURF WS 2
958.33
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 — 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page - 15
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425010 5/31/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued...
202.36 TPM KIT 461396 507784 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
202.36
425011 5/31/2018 139880 MID CITY SERVICES - INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY
44.00 RUG LAUNDERING 461585 79456 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY
44.00
425012 5/31/2018 142453 MIDWEST ASPHALT SERVICES, LLC
22,562.50 W 62ND PAYMENT 1 461374 W 62ND ST 01445.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS W 62nd St
PAYMENT 1
2,850.00 W 62ND PAYMENT 1 461374 W 62ND ST 05573.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS West 62nd Street
PAYMENT 1
25,412.50
425013 5/31/2018 142502 MIKE MOTORS OF MINNESOTA INC
25,369.00 NEW UNMARKED SQUAD 461428 8460J-2018 JEEP 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
25,369.00 NEW UNMARKED SQUAD CAR 461427 8461J-2018 JEEP 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
50,738.00
425014 5/31/2018 120304 MINNEAPOLIS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
35.00 MAY CRITICAL ISSUES FORUM 461563 113220 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL
35.00
425015 5/31/2018 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC.
188.95 T-STAT 461538 1 585939-00 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
89.18 WELL AIR CONTROLLER 461739 1586778-00 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
278.13
425016 5/31/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
40.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 461372 753944 5760.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
40.00
425017 5/31/2018 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT
403.57 ROLLER, BLADES 461746 P57344 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING
47.80 WHEEL 461747 P57447 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING
50.34 SPINDLE 461748 P57449 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING
25.64 WHEEL 461749 P57504 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING
527.35
425018 5/31/2018 126724 MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 16
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425018 5/31/2018 126724 MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSN Continued...
220.00 2018 MTOA REGISTRATION 461608 05242018SWAT 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
3,000.00 2018 MTOA REGISTRATION 461608 05242018SWAT 1401.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
3,220.00
425019 5/31/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC
175.50 461682 5959 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
427.50 461466 6094 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
371.25 461696 6095 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
364.50 461491 6096 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,338.75
425020 5/31/2018 141377 MONTGOMERY BREWING COMPANY LLC
256.50 461584 051118-YORK 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
237.00 461719 52118_EDINAYORK 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
493.50
425021 5/31/2018 126981 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC.
108.00 DRINKING FOUNTAIN REPAIR 461743 INV5098D 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
108.00
425022 5/31/2018 105595 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. - USE 100906
16,246.37 MOWER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 461378 1161358-00 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT
17,396.37 MOWER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 461377 1161361-00 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT
33,642.74
425023 5/31/2018 141215 NEGOCE LLC
185.46 461692 198445 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
185.46
425024 5/31/2018 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING
112.00 ADVERTISING 461367 N10412389 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
112.00
425025 5/31/2018 142524 NELSON, CATHERINE
45.00 DECOY -ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE 461620 20180523CN 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION
45.00
425026 5/31/2018 130461 NEOGOV
13,760.00 NEOGOV 17-18 461350 INV 23460 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
13,760.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 17
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 -
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425026
425027
5/31/2018
5/31/2018
130461 NEOGOV
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
Continued...
507.50 461656 131358 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
259.00 461368 131610 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
677.50 461650 131611 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
409.00 461405 131612 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,853.00
425028 5/31/2018 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC
452.40 LIGHTHEADS 461385 45865 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
452.40
425029 5/3112018 101659 ORKIN
146.52 CITY HALLL PEST CONTROL 461353 169018297 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL
90.00- NORTH RAMP CREDIT 461352 172496652 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
56.52
425030 5/31/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
132.50 461605 11804 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
373.00 461420 11805 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,471.75 461359 11833 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,077.00 461611 11835 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
776.50 461399 11836 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
549.60 461360 11837 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,380.35
425031 5/31/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
754.60 SODAAND WATER 461527 46464515 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
321.12 CONCESSIONS FOOD 461533 47475466 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
398.10 461558 50264903 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
185.60 PEPSI 461431 51908366 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
1,659.42
425032 5/31/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
964.59 461664 2358295 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,275.71 461663 2358296 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
311.19 461471 2361958 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
65.19 461470 2361959 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
933.57 461707 2361960 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
622.38 461510 2361961 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 18
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 -
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425032 5/31/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued...
771.96 461472 2361962 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,750.44 461469 2361963 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
41.69 461704 2361965 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
290.13 461700 2361966 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
6,100.04 461688 2361967 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
199.75 461509 2361970 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
488.61 461511 2361971 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,360.18 461513 2361972 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,055.47 461713 2362198 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
12.63- 461486 294157 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
9.00- 461487 294158 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
8.58- 461488 294159 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
11.93- 461489 294173 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
20,188.76
425033 5/31/2018 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC.
412.65 LUCAS PARTS 461633 60693 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT
412.65
425034 5/31/2018 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC.
2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 461440 348536 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
2,223.86
425035 5/31/2018 142500 PLM LAKE AND LAND MANAGEMENT CORP
1,225.00 ARROWHEAD APM PERMIT 461638 12624 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC
1,155.00 INDIANHEAD APM PERMIT 461639 12625 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR
487.00 ARROWHEAD DYE TREATMENT 461640 12628 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC
2,867.00
425036 5/31/2018 141673 PREMIER LIGHTING INC.
8,647.94 BRAEMAR ARENA EAST LIGHTING 461445 45165 2710.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CAS ADMINISTRATION
8,647.94
425037 5/31/2018 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC.
823.59 CONTRACTED REPAIR 461379 M92443-1 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
823.59
425038 5/31/2018 141962 REAL LIFE TRAINING SOLUTIONS
750.00 INSTRUCTOR FEE 461586 20180522 7414.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC PROGRAMS
750.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 19
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 —
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425038 5/31/2018
425039 5/31/2018
141962 REAL LIFE TRAINING SOLUTIONS
101698 RECREONICS
Continued...
102.26 DIVING BOARD NUTS & BOLTS 461439 110/CITIE 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
102.26
425040 5/31/2018 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC.
216.00 461412 49854805 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
216.00
425041 5/31/2018 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
205.12 WATER SOFTNER SALT 461539 357799 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
205.12
425042 5/31/2018 139439 RUE 38 LLC
243.00 461417 3311 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
243.00 461607 3312 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
486.00
425043 5/31/2018 137771 SAND CREEK GROUP LTD, THE
2,498.97 LEADERSHIP COACHING 461349 96171 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
2,498.97
425044 5/31/2018 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC.
182.68 HVAC FILTERS 461540 142355 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
182.68
425045 5/31/2018 142499 SHERMIK TREE FARM
6,500.00 TREE PLANTING 461740 170 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE
6,500.00
425046 5/31/2018 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
52.70 TIMECLOCK RENTAL 461438 13085290 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION
52.70
425047 5/31/2018 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC
584.73 461734 85981872 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION
584.73
425048 5/31/2018 142529 SMITH, RACHEL
160.00 TRAVELIN TEENS REFUND 461625 052318 1600.4390.31 TRAVELIN TEENS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL Page - 20
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
5/31/2018 -
Doc No Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425048 5/31/2018 142529 SMITH, RACHEL Continued.,.
160.00
425049 5/31/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
4.53 461597 1684118 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3.20 461416 1684120 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,179.20 461354 1685343 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,622.45 461361 1685344 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,442.27 461363 1685345 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4.00 461645 1685346 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,445.37 461614 1685347 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
579.28 461644 1685348 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,733.26 461637 1685349 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,431.83 461615 1685350 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
278.80 461643 1685351 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,338.40 461642 1685352 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2.40 461407 1685353 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,809.80 461408 1685354 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
5,643.89 461400 1685355 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,635.73 461406 1685356 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,839.60 461409 1685357 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,770.88- 461458 9107012X 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
133.56- 461543 9120921 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,452.00- 461451 9128220 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
250.98- 461544 9128222 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
378.00- 461549 9128395 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
153.00- 461548 9128396 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
42.00- 461547 9128397 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
196.00- 461452 9128483 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
716.00- 461546 9128485 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
50.20- 461450 9128489 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
160.00- 461545 9128491 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
8.79- 461550 9129307 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
250.00- 461453 9130305 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
225.00- 461551 9131275 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
550.00- 461552 9131902 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
365.00- 461454 9133344 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
890.00- 461559 9133346 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
96.00- 461457 9135072 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
15.66- 461456 9135073 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
100.00- 461455 9135994 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 — 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page - 21
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425049 5/31/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued...
.80- 461560 9139806 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
21,190.14
425050 5/31/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
740.00 461485 21605 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
572.00 461686 21606 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
224.00 461481 21607 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,536.00
425051 5/31/2018 142528 STEPHAN, TIERZA
25.00 PICKLEBALL REFUND 461624 052318 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS
25.00
425052 5/31/2018 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
570.36 TIRES 461393 10153447 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
51.30 TIRES 461394 10153450 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
621.66
425053 5/31/2018 141470 SUPERION, LLC
114,764.06 2018 SERVICE CONTRACT 461426 201352 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
114,764.06
425054 5/31/2018 137673 SWEETLAND ORCHARD LLC
360.00 461684 2191 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
180.00 461649 2203 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
540.00
425055 5/31/2018 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA
293.44 461430 147850484 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
293.44
425056 5/31/2018 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC.
211.00 DRAFT CC MIN 5/1/2018 461343 M23805 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
211.00
425057 5/31/2018 134841 TRUEMAN WELTERS
504.93 DECK REPAIR 461744 ID60317 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING
504.93
425058 5/31/2018 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
5/30/2018 10:37:59
Page - 22
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425058 5/31/2018 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Continued...
327.50 SEED COURTNEY 461752 42273 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE
327.50
425059 5/31/2018 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC.
896.29 TAKE DOWN BOOM LIFT 461348 156931427-001 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
896.29
425060 5/31/2018 140954 URBAN GROWLER BREWING COMPANY LLC
528.00 461588 E-20959 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
528.00
425061 5/31/2018 101058 VAN PAPER CO.
68.00 461345 462533-02 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY
68.00
425062 5/31/2018 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
35.01 FINANCE VZ MIFI 461422 9806372157 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE
70.02 PARKSREC VZ IPAD 461422 9806372157 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
70.02 PLANNING VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING
70.02 PW-ELECTRICAL VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
105.03 IT VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
105.03 CTS VZ IPADS 461422 9806372157 1130.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS
140.04 ASSESSING VZ TABLETS 461422 9806372157 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING
175.05 PARK MAINT VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
245.07 ENGINEERING VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL
254.23 ADMIN VZ IPAD 461422 9806372157 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION
490.14 INSPECTIONS VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS
770.22 FIRE VZ MIFI 461422 9806372157 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,260.36 POLICE VZ DATA 461422 9806372157 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
70.02 BGC VZ TABLETS 461422 9806372157 5422.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
35.01 TSHIRLEY VZ TABLETS 461422 9806372157 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
70.02 LIQ-50TH VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
70.02 LIQ-SDALE VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY
70.02 LIQ-GVIEWVZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY
700.20 PW VZ DEVICES 461422 9806372157 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING)
50.84 RESCUE 91 IPHONE 461423 9806429743 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
114.82 PLANNING IPHONES 461423 9806429743 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING
133.06 PARK MAINT VZ PHONES 461423 9806429743 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
1,029.10 POLICE VZ PHONES 461423 9806429743 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
295.84 PUBLIC WORKS VZ PHONES 461423 9806429743 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING)
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
5 /30/2018 10:37:59
Page- 23
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425062 5/31/2018 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS Continued...
92.22 SMTF VZ PHONES 461423 9806429743 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY
6,521.41
425063 5/31/2018 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY
560.00 ANNUAL FIRE SPRINKLER INSP. 461535 1025-F028928 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
560.00
425064 5/31/2018 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.
89.52 CORD 461732 S001517033.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
89.52
425065 5/31/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN
66.43 PW MAINT 461362 7795772-2282-0 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
66.43 PW BLDG 461362 7795772-2282-0 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING
132.86
425066 5/31/2018 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICES INC.
586.02 LEAK LOCATES 461542 8549 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
586.02
425067 5/31/2018 130574 WATSON COMPANY
356.80 CONCESSIONS FOOD 461532 887681 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
356.80
425068 5/31/2018 142523 WESTGARD, MARY
31.44 REFUND 461619 77079 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
31.44
425069 5/31/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
81.19- 461601 7152474A 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
19.00- 461603 7173104A 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,300.03 461668 7183602 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,854.80 461473 7184618 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1.19 461475 7184619 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
41.88 461705 7184621 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
704.14 461695 7184622 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
83.76 461515 7184624 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,207.95 461502 7184625 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
5,093.56
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:37:59
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 24
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
5/31/2018 —
Inv No
5/31/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425070 5/31/2018 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY Continued...
210.00 461478 1031 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
220.00 461500 1032 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
468.00 461691 1033 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
898.00
425071 5/31/2018 116774 WOODLAKE NATURE CENTER
440.00 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS 461425 0065 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
440.00
425072 5/31/2018 120099 Z WINES USA LLC
85.00 461497 20212 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
85.00 461463 20253 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
170.00
1,125,591.67 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Checks 1,037,926.53
A/P ACH Payment 87,665.14
Total Payments 1,125,591.67
CITY OF EDINA 5/30/2018 10:38:04
Council Check Summary Page - 1
5/31/2018 - 5/31/2018
R55CKS2 LOGIS100
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 244,515.35
02700 CONSERVATION & SUSTAINABILITY 8,647.94
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 90.00-
04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 123,039.25
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 84,793.39
05100 ART CENTER FUND 443.79
05200 GOLF DOME FUND 109.88
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,259.42
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 1,176.60
05500 ICE ARENA FUND 2,333.60
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 1,044.47
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 6,720.16
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 4,810.18
05800 LIQUOR FUND 228,506.60
05900 UTILITY FUND 85,312.03
05930 STORM SEWER FUND 8,640.47
06000 RISK MGMT ISF 313,428.38
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 900.16
09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 6,000.00
Report Totals 1,125,591.67
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 -- 6/7/2018
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page- 1
Business Unit
6500 6/7/2018 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
2,635.00 INVERTER 462112 0156087-IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,635.00
6501 6/7/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
16.98 461789 2240565 5600.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
115.48 461924 2240571 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
86.04 461788 2240576 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
134.45 461940 2241246 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
231.10 462037 2241451 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
91.14 461996 2241456 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
58.87 462006 2242249 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
734.06
6502 6/7/2018 100575 ALL SAFE INC.
124.05 MONTHLY FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSP 462101 162794 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
124.05
6503 6/7/2018 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
396.15 COFFEE-FIRE 462183 1326006 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
396.15
6504 6/7/2018 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC.
389.00 GOAL NETTING 461800 1013216 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
389.00 GOAL NETTING 462104 1013311 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
778.00
6505 6/7/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
266.65 462026 64372300 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
569.75 462027 64428400 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,048.90 461944 64428600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,654.85 462025 64428800 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
770.95 461987 64428900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
129.59 462004 97693400 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
144.86 461945 97693500 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
87.40 462024 97693700 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
7,672.95
6506 6/7/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
76.38 SUPPLIES 461797 139549 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING
76.38
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 — 6/7/2018
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 2
Business Unit
6506
6507
6/7/2018
6/7/2018
122688 BMK SOLUTIONS
100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
Continued...
5,800.00 MASTER PLAN BRIDGE DESIGN 461863 B129952 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
5,800.00
6508 6/7/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS
35.77 SUPPLIES FOR KERSTEN 462170 M-16190005/31/2 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
018
49.03 SUPPLIES FOR KERSTEN 462169 OE-481692-1 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
84.80
6509 6/7/2018 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON
8,402.59 462316 2851G-4/18 BAL 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY
8,402.59
6510 6/7/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO
1,703.00 462039 67-4143 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
290.00 461995 67-4145 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,993.00
6511 6/7/2018 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC.
1,224.00 RAMP AND SIDEWALK CLEANING 462188 7070251488 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
2,450.00 CITY HALL CLEANING 462189 7070251712 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL
3,674.00
6512 6/7/2018 104020 DALCO
584.14 W CLEANING SUPPLIES 461792 3320034 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
658.18 PW CLEANING SUPPLIES 462146 3323192 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1,242.32
6513 6/7/2018 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL
958.50 LESSONS 5/17-5/30/18 462063 53118 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
958.50
6514 6/7/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.
156.66 461790 596309 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
156.67 461790 596309 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
156.67 461790 596309 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
353.00 PW OPEN HOUSE PRINTING 461908 600034 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
823.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 3
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 -
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
6514
6515
6/7/2018
6/7/2018
132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.
102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER
Continued...
1,345.50 LESSONS 5/17-30/18 462061 53118 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
1,345.50
6516 6/7/2018 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC.
750.70 HAZMAT SENSOR 462273 248347 1470.6550 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
750.70
6517 6/7/2018 115192 KNUDSON, DEBORAH
1,071.00 LESSONS 5/17-5/30/18 462062 53118 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
1,071.00
6518 6/7/2018 101792 LUBE-TECH
7,251.49 LUBRICANTS 461811 1164706 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
110.00 USED OIL FILTER PICK UP 462116 1168823 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
7,361.49
6519 6/7/2018 101483 MENARDS
37.95 OFFICE REMODEL 462110 068775 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION
81.47 GENERAL SUPPLIES 462110 068775 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
125.62 SEALER BREDESEN 461794 68760 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE
47.86 SUPPLIES 461804 68863 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
4.84 CONFERENCE ROOM 461802 68884 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION
11.24 SUPPLIES 461803 68928 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
91.92 MAILBOX MATERIAL 462128 69277 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
61.83 SEALANT/RAIN BOOTS 462130 69279 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
50.29 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL 462133 69281 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
46.53 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL 462129 69309 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
83.16 EQUIPMENT CAGE WELDING SUPPLIE 462280 69340 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
250.39 MAILBOX MATERIAL 462131 69356 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
44.65- CEDAR CREDIT 462158 69359 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
33.49 MAILBOX MATERIAL 462132 69360 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
15.49 CONCRETE SUPPLIES ROSLAND 462159 69371 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
49.98 462240 69441 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY
105.38 CONCRETE ROSLAND 462160 69451 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
22.97 PICKAXE 462103 69490 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
23.16 CAGE CASTERS 462103 69490 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
46.57 NETTING GROUND SLEEVE REPAIR 462108 69721 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
1,145.49
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 4
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 -
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
6519
6520
6/7/2018
6/7/2018
101483 MENARDS
102769 MILLER, TOM
Continued...
652.50 LESSONS 5/17-5/30/18 462064 53118 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES
652.50
6521 6/7/2018 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
113.16 TINES 462151 1167587-00 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
84.32 TINES 462164 1167587-01 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
175.61 MOWER REPAIR PARTS 462274 1168418-00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
373.09
6522 6/7/2018 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC.
79.95 461973 210347594 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,795.83 TIRES FOR BIG TOW TRUCK 462139 210347801. 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,875.78
6523 6/7/2018 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
435.10 GLOVES, LINERS, SANITIZER 462265 14306 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
186.54 BATHROOM SUPPLIES 462105 14307 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
20.73 BATHROOM SUPPLIES 462105 14307 5553.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
901.73 LINERS, SOAP, TOWELS 462141 14313 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
157.79 PAPER TOWELS, TISSUE 462263 14315 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
156.12 BDAY 9" PLATES 462264 14316 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
92.91 2 GARBAGE CANS 462266 14317 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION
190.78 COMPOSTABLE STRAWS 9600 462266 14317 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS
2,141.70
6524 6/7/2018 105690 PRO-TEC DESIGN INC.
176.00- SECURITY CAMERA SERVICE 461862 85346CR 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLUB HOUSE
2,890.27 ARNENSON ACRES GREEN BATHROOM 461813 85866 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2,714.27
6525 6/7/2018 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC.
175.00 ZAM MAINTENANCE SEMINAR 462220 06042018.1 5510.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ARENA ADMINISTRATION
175.00
6526 6/7/2018 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
231.00 REPAIR LEAK SOUTH ZAM ROOM 462109 73969 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT
231.00
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 - 6/7/2018
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page- 5
Business Unit
6527 6/7/2018 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS Continued...
46.99 BUSINESS CARDS-KERSTEN 461879 100226 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
46.99
6528 6/7/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC.
36.04 REPAIR PARTS FOR PLUMBING 462177 S3611016.001 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS WATER TREATMENT
36.04
6529 6/7/2018 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
71.81 WIRING HARNESS 462246 351212X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
71.81
6530 6/7/2018 118190 TURFWERKS LLC
76.22 PTO SWITCH 462163 E106430 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING
76.22
6531 6/7/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA
487.50 462038 0207888 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,046.00 462034 0207890 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
487.50 461991 207886-1N 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
500.75 461992 207887-IN 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
127.50 462035 207889 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
881.50 461946 207891 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,530.75
6532 6/7/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
817.90 461951 72873 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
608.40 461890 72874 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
466.65 461926 72892 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,892.95
425073 6/7/2018 100611 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER
85.79 RENTAL EQUIPMENT- MAINTENANCE 461839 126460 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
85.79
425074 6/7/2018 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY
71.20 MERCHANDISE 461857 905880020 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
165.50 MERCHANDISE 461859 905899160 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
262.36 MERCHANDISE 461858 905899163 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
499.06
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 6
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 - 6/7/2018
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425075 6/7/2018 132835 ADCOCK, MARIAN Continued...
2.37 ARTWORK SOLD 461902 053018 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
2.37
425076 6/7/2018 130792 AIRGAS NATIONAL CARBONATION
498.55 CARBON DIOXIDE FOR FR 462262 34736332 5330.6545 CHEMICALS FLOWRIDER
498.55
425077 6/7/2018 142387 AIRSTAR AMERICA INC
4,760.00 462187 SR-INV-FL-01896 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
6
4,760.00
425078 6/7/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
23.98 SIGNS 461821 13VR-JYCV-TXNJ 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
248.08 TENNIS BALLS 461801 13VR-JYCV-V4GR 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION
12.95 BELL 462098 16XT-VVV74-KN NC 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION
4.79 SUPPLIES 462154 16XT-VVV74-LV61 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
22.12 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 462282 174G-47C7-63FF 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
39.78 PLAYGROUND PROGRAM 462285 19YR-C99N-GLET 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
51.62 TENNIS SUPPLIES 462184 19YR-C99N-GXJR 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION
62.46 OUTDOOR LIGHT BULBS 461865 1DYV-QJ H 1-Q FCW 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE
23.70 IT SUPPLIES 461869 1KQ1-V1P9-VYVG 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
64.40 GAME SUPPLIES 462286 1KX3-PHPW-CMLF 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
119.38 OSCILLATING FANS FOR TRACK 462261 1QXV-K6C6-MF9V 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
32.66 BALLOONS 462152 10.XV-K6C6-RCNQ 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
68.97 FAN 462153 1QXV-K6C6-VPFR 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
132.77 TENNIS SUPPLIES 461798 1 RPD-RQ96-9PNH 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION
89.99 TENNIS BALLS 461799 1RPD-RQ96-QN7G 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION
42.96 SPRAY BOTTLES, DIAPER LINERS 462267 1VRQ-DWQ9-7LKW 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
36.48 CARPET CLEANING SOLUTION 462155 1VRQ-DWQ9-Y9NF 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
22.99 LOCK FOR GARDEN GATE 461805 1WTY-99CT-LTVVX 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL
12.99 SIGNAGE 461820 1WTY-99CT-YVDC 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
66.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 461833 1Y9F-L163-46VVT 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,179.83
425079 6/7/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC.
194.79 LAUNDRY 462207 1004154915 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
105.17 461791 103533424 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
299.96
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 — 6/7/2018
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 7
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425080 6/7/2018 135278 ANNMADE INC. Continued...
16.80 ARTWORKSOLD 461901 053018 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
16.80
425081 6/7/2018 141972 AP MIDWEST LLC
933,614.40 462317 APPL 4 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
933,614.40
425082 6/7/2018 137556 ARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE
337.50 GR GREEN ARCH CONSULTING 462182 201816 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
3,000.00 COMP. PLAN UPDATE - GREATER S 462202 201817 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING
1,318.75 PROJECT REVIEW- SOUTHDALE ARE 462203 201818 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING
4,656.25
425083 6/7/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY
9.68- 461937 3250884A 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,798.20 461984 3266054 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
44.50 462008 3266582 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
8,258.70 462036 3266583 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER- LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
12.24- 461884 423093 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
42.02- 462029 423124 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
25.50- 461888 423125 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
13,011.96
425084 6/7/2018 100639 BAILEY NURSERIES
2,510.75 TREES AND SHRUBS 462142 INV0528568 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
2,510.75
425085 6/7/2018 142583 BEHM, KIM
79.00 SUMMER PROGRAMS REFUND 462087 053118 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
90.00 SUMMER PROGRAMS REFUND 462087 053118 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL
169.00
425086 6/7/2018 100661 BENN, BRADLEY
10.80 ARTWORK 461903 053018 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
10.80
425087 6/7/2018 125139 BERNICK'S
597.30 461981 426207A 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
40.00 461935 428912 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,482.43 461929 428913 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 8
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 —
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425087 6/7/2018 125139 BERNICK'S Continued...
619.89 461968 428915 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
456.16 461897 429048 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,195.78
425088 6/7/2018 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY
17.85 SUGAR 462102 564463 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
17.85
425089 6/7/2018 141961 BHE COMMUNITY SOLAR LLC
5,853.19 462294 8455121 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
5,853.19
425090 6/7/2018 142577 BIG LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT
49.00 REFUND FOR SFST 462081 053118 7401.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PSTF REVENUE
49.00
425091 6/7/2018 142579 BIRELEY, MEGAN
67.00 SUPER 6/7 REFUND 462083 053118 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
67.00
425092 6/7/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC.
116.00 461896 2461 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
116.00 461931 2462 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
116.00 461939 2463 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
348.00
425093 6/7/2018 142610 BLOOMINGTON PUBLIC HEALTH
45.00 HEP B SCREENING 462221 060418 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
45.00
425094 6/7/2018 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY
7,790.00 461816 915355293 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
7,790.00
425095 6/7/2018 142593 BOSLEY, KATIE
117.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462074 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
117.00
425096 6/7/2018 142591 BOUNDS, AMY
141.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462094 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 - 6/7/2018
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 9
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425096 6/7/2018 142591 BOUNDS, AMY Continued...
141.00
425097 6/7/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS
255.00 461928 151271 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
176.22 461948 151342 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
431.22
425098 6/7/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS
2.43 MOUNTING GASKET 462241 1230777 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
36.97 STUD, GASKET 462244 1230777X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
67.80 SLACK ADJUSTER, CLAMP 462243 1231369 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
107.20
425099 6/7/2018 142566 BRASS FOUNDRY BREWING CO.
230.80 462028 E-1033 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
230.80
425100 6/7/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA
1,334.50 461953 1080807405 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
5,736.18 461954 1080807406 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
503.00 461955 1080807407 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
71.26 461956 1080807408 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
542.90 461881 1080807409 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
740.20 461883 1080807410 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,073.62 461917 1080807411 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,047.88 461916 1080807412 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
11.50 461919 1080807413 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
31.15 461912 1080807454 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
15,092.19
425101 6/7/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC
5,913.05 461961 1090863022 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,361.45 461834 1090863023 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
9,486.10 461923 1090863024 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
76.65 461922 1090863025 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
17,837.25
425102 6/7/2018 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
1,095.12 462137 12892327-00 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
1,095.12
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 10
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 -
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425102
425103
6/7/2018
6/7/2018
100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.
Continued...
257.41 462185 28076 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION
257.41
425104 6/7/2018 141596 BUSHLAND, TIFFANY
180.50 TIFFANY MILES 462259 FEB 11-MAY 10 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARKADMIN. GENERAL
2018
180.50
425105 6/7/2018 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
535.50 MERCHANDISE 461849 929147854 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
222.30 MERCHANDISE 461851 929147855 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
1,068.54 MERCHANDISE 461853 929147856 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
923.41 MERCHANDISE 461850 929147858 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
108.90- MERCHANDISE 461852 929160847 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
2,640.85
425106 6/7/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
1,152.65 461836 2111480 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
22.35 461835 2111481 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
6,072.60 461938 2111482A 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
85.80 461963 2111484 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,496.55 461962 2241453 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
143.00- 461921 625-0037 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
11,686.95
425107 6/7/2018 129923 CAWLEY COMPANY, THE
12.16 NAME BADGE 461787 V540907 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION
12.16 NAME BADGE 461787 V540907 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE
12.16 NAME BADGE - MOLD 461787 V540907 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
24.32 NAME BADGES - ROTTY 461787 V540907 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION
177.50 461910 V541697 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
177.50 461910 V541697 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
177.51 461910 V541697 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
593.31
425108 6/7/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY
39.03 462296 10089900-5/18 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
3,315.85 462301 10437426-5/18 5553.6186 HEAT SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 - 6/7/2018
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 11
Business Unit
425108 6/7/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued...
963.75 462302 5546504-5/18 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
90.52 462304 5566163-5/18 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION
2,011.69 462303 5591458-5/18 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL
63.40 462298 5596524-5/18 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
2,756.51 462295 563827-5/18 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
969.73 462297 8034001-5/18 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING
834.38 462299 9724639-5/18 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
11,044.86
425109 6/7/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK
134.53 462290 0024-5/18 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
57.96 462292 0297-5/18 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
60.88 462287 1565-5/18 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE
60.22 462289 1586-5/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
84.74 462288 2444-5/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
65.22 VVTP 6 PHONE LINE 462111 8632-5/18 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION
457.04 462291 8861-5/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
920.59
425110 6/7/2018 142533 CES IMAGING
69.75 CANON PRINTER LEASE 461822 INV086243 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
209.25 CANON PRINTER LEASE 461822 INV086243 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL
279.00
425111 6/7/2018 100683 CHEMSEARCH
115.45 SOUTH FILTERS 462278 3143773 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
115.45
425112 6/7/2018 142585 CHOI, EUNHEE
40.00 REFUND TEAM TENNIS 462089 053118 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
40.00
425113 6/7/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION
80.22 LINENS 461854 4006046074 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL
15.12 RUG SERVICE 462106 4006215247 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
36.26 LAUNDRY 462055 4006255424 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
38.30 UNIFORM RENTAL 462056 4006255441 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE
11.78 UNIFORM RENTAL 462053 4006255511 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
19.92 UNIFORM RENTAL 462054 4006255532 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION
55.23 UNIFORM RENTAL 462052 4006255559 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 12
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 —
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425113 6/7/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION Continued...
8.00 SHOP TOWELS 462249 4006424329 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
264.83
425114 6/7/2018 139668 CITY HOMES LLC
100.00 PULLED BY MISTAKE 462075 163256 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS
100.00
425115 6/7/2018 142578 COLLINS, ALISSA
79.00 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS REFUND 462082 053118 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARKADMIN. GENERAL
79.00
425116 6/7/2018 120433 COMCAST
33.87 CABLE TV 461830 877210614037302 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2-5/18
33.87
425117 6/7/2018 120433 COMCAST
20.31 CABLE TV 462277 0161120-5/18 5511.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
20.31
425118 6/7/2018 124118 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES
294.90 CONTRACTED REPAIR 462121 27781 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
294.90
425119 6/7/2018 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC.
908.80 SPEC MIX FOR STRUCTURES 462178 0170051-IN 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER
908.80
425120 6/7/2018 100012 CORE & MAIN
145.60 PIPE FOR STORM STRUCTURES 462175 1925055 5932.6535 PIPE GENERAL STORM SEWER
145.60
425121 6/7/2018 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC.
531.39 CONCESSIONS FOOD 462279 6501770 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS
531.39
425122 6/7/2018 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES
2,350.60 TOWELS FOR AC TO BE SOLD 462167 60770 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION
2,350.60
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 — 6/7/2018
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 13
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425123 6/7/2018 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. Continued...
85.98 CANOPY STRUT 462242 173090 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
85.98
425124 6/7/2018 103176 DANICIC, JOHN
25.20 ARTWORK SOLD 462045 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
25.20
425125 6/7/2018 142607 DAVIS, STEPHEN
96.77 REFUND 462079 0201104009 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
96.77
425126 6/7/2018 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
2,754.85 JUNE STD INVOICE 461900 F018342-5/18 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING
2,754.85
425127 6/7/2018 124357 DELANEY, ALICE
30.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462046 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
30.00
425128 6/7/2018 140797 DIETZEN, KRISTINA
210.00 REFUND TEAM TENNIS 462069 053118 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
210.00
425129 6/7/2018 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
288.00 NORTH RAMP EXP-LEGAL 462225 3409539 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
6,918.50 5146 REDEV PLAN LEGAL 462235 3409541 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
2,329.00 GR GREEN LEGAL 462238 3416276 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
2,260.50 5146 SITE REDEV LEGAL 462236 3416277 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
4,389.00 NORTH RAMP EXP LEGAL 462224 3416279 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
3,151.00 GR GREEN LEGAL 462237 3420153 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
2,055.00 5146 REDEV PLAN LEGAL 462234 3420155 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
7,310.00 NORTH RAMP EXP - LEGAL 462226 3420161 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
4,521.00 PENTAGON NORTH ESCROW 462232 3420162 9210.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL HRAADMINISTRATION
1,575.50 PENTAGON SOUTH ESCROW 462231 3420165 9210.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL HRAADMINISTRATION
1,697.50 7250 REDEV LEGAL REVIEW ESCROW 462233 3420181 9210.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL HRAADMINISTRATION
36,495.00
425130 6/7/2018 142584 DUDA, MARGARET
14.00 ARNESON DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 462088 053118 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
186.00 ARNESON DAMAGE DEPOSIT REFUND 462088 053118 1000.2065 DEPOSITS PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL Page - 14
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 --
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425130 6/7/2018 142584 DUDA, MARGARET Continued...
200.00
425131 6/7/2018 140357 DUDAK PRODUCTION INC.
483.33 462250 3239 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
483.33 462250 3239 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
483.34 462250 3239 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
1,450.00
425132 6/7/2018 104192 DYNAMIC BRANDS
188.45 PULL CART REPAIR PARTS 461823 1153812 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE
188.45
425133 6/7/2018 119082 EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION
260,000.00 6120 KELLOGG - LAND SALE 461982 060418 9235.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST
260,000.00
425134 6/7/2018 104645 EDINA GARDEN COUNCIL
1.05 ARTWORK SOLD 461904 053018 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
1.05
425135 6/7/2018 142458 EDINA MARKET STREET LLC
42,589.24 NORTH RAMP EXP - VALET 462222 05-11-2018 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
13,935.66 NORTH RAMP EXP SITE WORK 462213 05-25-2018 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
56,524.90
425136 6/7/2018 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC.
747.50 PENTAGON NORTH 462229 76775 9210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER HRAADMINISTRATION
2,472.50 SOUTHDALE 2 462228 76810 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT
632.50 4500 FRANCE 462230 76811 9210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER HRAADMINISTRATION
402.50 5146 REDEV PLAN 462227 76812 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
1,092.50 GR GREEN CONCEPT 462239 76813 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
5,347.50
425137 6/7/2018 139948 EISCHENS, CHAD
175.27 MILEAGE 462217 05302018 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENAADMINISTRATION
175.27
425138 6/7/2018 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
4,969.80 BUILD FOR 26-146 462147 JOR18034 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT
4,969.80
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 15
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 -
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425138
425139
6/7/2018
6/7/2018
122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC.
Continued...
1,279.98 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 462205 1991107 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,279.98
425140 6/7/2018 137587 EMMER, JILL
2.97 ARTWORK SOLD 461905 053018 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
2.97
425141 6/7/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
320.22 HUB ASSEMBLY 461974 1-5589426 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
189.82- CREDIT MEMO 462123 1-5589607 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
654.97 TENSIONER, HUB ASSEMBLY 462115 1-5595202 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
53.34 BRAKE LINING KIT 461971 69-312270 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
238.60 ROTOR ASSEMBLIES 461975 69-312426 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
65.35- CREDIT MEMO 462122 69-312430 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
26.63 WHEEL WEIGHTS 462118 69-312855 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
103.19 SPARK PLUGS, FILTER KITS 462114 69-313051 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
9.78 WHEEL WEIGHT 462119 75-302842 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
29.75 SPARK PLUGS 462113 75-303047 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,181.31
425142 6/7/2018 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY
35.29 462318 MNTC2152791 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
35.29
425143 6/7/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS
4,358.25 METERS 462192 0283357 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR
2,889.43 SL PARTS 462197 0283370 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
969.64 SL REPAIR PARTS 462174 0283573 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
8,217.32
425144 6/7/2018 138685 FIRE GATT LLC
3,162.55 NFPA LADDER AND HOSE TESTING. 462272 MN - 6579 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
3,162.55
425145 6/7/2018 140276 FISCHER, MICHAEL A
616.11 NATIONAL LEAGUE CONF REIMB 462201 05-23-2018 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL
616.11
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 16
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/7/2018 --
Doc No Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425146 6/7/2018 130699 FLEETPRIDE Continued...
71.58 EXHAUST PARTS 462245 94562470 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
71.58
425147 6/7/2018 137554 FRED HOLASEK & SON INC.
226.40 FLOWERS 462140 00019797 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
226.40
425148 6/7/2018 142571 FREDERICK, KIRSTEN
158.00 REFUND - HIGHLANDS EXPLOERS 462072 053018 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
158.00
425149 6/7/2018 136688 FUN EXPRESS LLC
920.25 ARTS & CRAFTS SUPPLIES 462284 689996584-01 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
920.25
425150 6/7/2018 142334 FURTHER
913.50 MAY SELECTACCOUNT INVOICE 461899 008816-5/18 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
913.50
425151 6/7/2018 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS
901.32 461843 41487737 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
901.32
425152 6/7/2018 141080 GODDARD, LUCY
79.00 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS REFUND 462067 053118 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
79.00
425153 6/7/2018 101103 GRAINGER
93.44 PIPE 461976 9796656255 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
31.32 AIR GUN 461979 9798236270 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
59.57 PIPE 462247 9800054018 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
437.64 SAFETY GLOVES 462156 9802564758 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
347.00 EAR PLUGS, GLASSES 462157 9802686627 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE
968.97
425154 6/7/2018 102202 GRAND VIEW LODGE
267.90 SEEGER MNSANI LODGING 462125 R7F591 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
267.90
425155 6/7/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 -- 6/7/2018
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page- 17
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425155 6/7/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Continued...
2.25- 461894 MN00031676-A 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
447.00 461918 MN00040261 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,665.00 461892 MN00040262 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
82.75 461959 MN00040264 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,192.50
425156 6/7/2018 136517 GRAY, SUSAN
28.80 ARTWORK SOLD 461906 053018 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
28.80
425157 6/7/2018 120834 GREEN, RICK
107.50 STAND ASSEMBLY 462218 53018 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
107.50
425158 6/7/2018 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES
341.81 BALL MARKERS/DIVOT REPAIR 461845 62956 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
341.81
425159 6/7/2018 142592 GUNDERSON, MARY
15.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462073 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
15.00
425160 6/7/2018 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC.
111.00 MULCH 461911 4-331160 5761.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
111.00
425161 6/7/2018 100797 HAWKINS INC.
4,119.55 TREATMENT CHEMICALS 462196 4290054 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
9,205.93 WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS 462191 4291131 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
13,325.48
425162 6/7/2018 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
2,870.01 EMS DIRECTOR FEES 462210 56129 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
2,870.01
425163 6/7/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
243.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY 462161 0093757 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
243.00
425164 6/7/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 - 6/7/2018
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 18
Business Unit
425164 6/7/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. Continued...
1,085.00 461837 966090 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,012.25 461930 966091 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,208.00 461942 966092 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
5,305.25
425165 6/7/2018 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
228.84 CHLOR 462268 180522008 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
228.84
425166 6/7/2018 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS
366.79 MILAGE 462216 05-31-2018 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE
366.79
425167 6/7/2018 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES
2,222.42 CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT 462200 05-23-2018 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL
2,222.42
425168 6/7/2018 136125 HYDRO-KLEEN LLC
938.00 GAS MONITOR REPAIRS 462176 60173 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION
938.00
425169 6/7/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC
35.48 FILTERS 461972 038046303 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
23.16 OIL FILTER 462269 038046948 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17.29 FILTER 462195 038046976 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
13.03 FILTERS 462276 038047424 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
88.96
425170 6/7/2018 101146 IMPACT TELECOM
499.60 462293 608632112 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS
499.60
425171 6/7/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY
1,347.00 461927 64538 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
256.00- 461957 64539 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
256.00 461957 64539 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
256.00 461957 64539 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,603.00
425172 6/7/2018 138240 INTERMEDIX
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 - 6/7/2018
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page- 19
Business Unit
425172 6/7/2018 138240 INTERMEDIX Continued...
6,002.95 462171 INVADPI26227 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
6,002.95
425173 6/7/2018 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
78.00 FORMS 462120 78501 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
166.00 SEASON PASS FORMS 462168 78596 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION
244.00
425174 6/7/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
2,057.01 461887 2835017 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
73.80 461885 2835018 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
9,474.02 461920 2835019 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
21.50 461958 2835022 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
304.25 BEER 461855 2845671 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE
296.85 BEER 462043 2845770 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE
5,813.25 461949 5813 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
18,040.68
425175 6/7/2018 136082 JOFIT LLC
191.09 MERCHANDISE 461860 209245 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
1,442.05 MERCHANDISE 461846 212281 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
1,633.14
425176 6/7/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
401.62 461998 1020054 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
38.19 462003 1020055 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
193.15 461999 1020056 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
260.20 462001 1020057 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,421.60 462000 1020058 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,411.06 461993 1020060 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
887.91 462002 1020061 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,588.92 462018 1020062 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
98.88 462010 1020063 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,025.86 462012 1020064 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,428.51 462017 1020065 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
426.76 462013 1020066 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,700.84 462023 1020067 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
25.19 462009 1020068 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,266.55 462014 1020069 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,417.02 462022 1020070 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 20
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 -
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425176 6/7/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued...
4,471.45 462016 1020071 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
.59 462030 5956357 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
.04- 462032 681468 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
30.78- 462033 681861 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
25,033.48
425177 6/7/2018 142504 JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE PROTECTION LP
327.95 ANNUAL FIRE ALARM INSPECTION 461980 20209090 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
492.40 JOHNSON CONTROLS SERVICE 461838 20210741 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE
820.35
425178 6/7/2018 142572 JOHNSON, TRACEY
131.00 REFUND SOCCER SHOTS 462095 053018 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
131.00
425179 6/7/2018 130789 KATZ, DAVID
141.75 HOMETOWN HEROES STORIES 461831 833 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
166.25 PUBLIC WORKS PIPELINE STORIES 461831 833 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
365.95 ABOUT TOWN HISTORICAL COLUMN 461831 833 1130.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
673.95
425180 6/7/2018 136686 KIDCREATE STUDIO
150.00 SPECIAL VISIT-ART IN THE PARK 462283 8883 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
150.00
425181 6/7/2018 124002 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC.
6,359.68 SOUTH RAMP WORK 461819 11291398 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
6,359.68
425182 6/7/2018 105887 KOESSLER, JOE
314.00 AQUARIUM MAINTENANCE 462258 MAY-JUNE 2018 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS
314.00
425183 6/7/2018 137679 LANG, CARRIE
79.00 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS REFUND 462068 053118 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
79.00
425184 6/7/2018 115852 LANO EQUIPMENT INC.
936.77 BELTS, FILTERS, PUMP 461969 01-562176 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
936.77
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 21
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 —
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425184
425185
6/7/2018
6/7/2018
115852 LANO EQUIPMENT INC.
135227 LANO EQUIPMENT-LORETTO
Continued...
108.85 LUBRICANT 462117 03-562588 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
108.85
425186 6/7/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
606.71 BOLTS,GENERAL HARWARE 462275 9305865370 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
606.71
425187 6/7/2018 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
130.00 2018 MN MAYORS CONF 462181 271769 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL
130.00
425188 6/7/2018 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
22,643.64 1ST Q WC HOME PAYMENT 462214 1STQTR 2018 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
22,643.64
425189 6/7/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
3,542.95 PD LOSSES FOR CLAIM 2/23/18 461898 3578 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE
3,542.95
425190 6/7/2018 142575 LEINBERGER, JEREMY
43.50 CITATION #270618204139 REIMB 462080 05-30-2018 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
43.50
425191 6/7/2018 140403 LEOTEK ELECTRONICS USA LLC
14,750.00 LED POLE LIGHTS 462194 4109619472 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
14,750.00
425192 6/7/2018 135867 LIBATION PROJECT
139.50 461960 14999 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
139.50
425193 6/7/2018 116575 LIFELINE INC.
590.00 AED TRAINING 461970 LL-10298 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
590.00
425194 617/2018 121078 LMS IRRIGATION INC.
153.75 IRRIGATION REPAIR 462320 29616 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
153.75
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 22
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/7/2018 —
Doc No Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425194 6/7/2018
425195 6/7/2018
121078 LMS IRRIGATION INC.
141916 LUPULIN BREWING
Continued...
126.00 461947 12873 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
126.00 461936 12874 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
126.00 461994 12875 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
378.00
425196 6/7/2018 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC.
1,019.30 461815 218601 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
3,402.00 461808 218695 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
2,291.20 461809 218725 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
2,311.20 462138 218759 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION
9,023.70
425197 6/7/2018 131685 MAILFINANCE INC,
209.22 MAIL MACHINE RENTAL 462271 N7169902 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
209.22
425198 6/7/2018 137819 MCCONNACH, COREY
42.51 MILEAGE 462256 06042018 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENAADMINISTRATION
42.51
425199 6/7/2018 134646 MCGRATH, PATTY
1,600.00 AQUATIC CENTER CHANGE 462215 05302018 5300.1030 PETTY CASH AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
1,600.00
425200 6/7/2018 102281 MENARDS
34.99 CLOCK 461909 69488 5921.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
71.71 WATER PARTS FOR PARKS BUILDING 461909 69488 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION
106.70
425201 6/7/2018 100885 METRO SALES INC
2,244.30 QTRLY HP SERVICE 461868 INV1078786 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
2,244.30
425202 6/7/2018 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER
2,210.00 SL REPAIR 462198 35652 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
1,700.00 SL REPAIR 462190 35653 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
1,870.00 SERVICE LINE REPAIR 462199 35654 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION
5,780.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 23
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 -
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425202 6/7/2018
425203 6/7/2018
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER
127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC.
Continued...
5.38 462251 180109178 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
21.51 462253 180109179 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY
16.13 462252 180109180 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY
43.02
425204 6/7/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
40.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 462162 753921 5110.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
40.00
425205 6/7/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
40.00 HOSPITALITY FEE 462219 530 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION
40.00
425206 6/7/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS
35.00 EDITION: EDINA REPRINTS 461829 25199 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS
35.00
425207 6/7/2018 108537 MOORE, JOEL
300.00 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 461886 05/29/2018 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
300.00
425208 6/7/2018 102776 MRPA
264.00 2018 MRPA SOFTBALL TEAM REG 461875 9517 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
264.00
425209 6/7/2018 105595 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. - USE 100906
48.78 REPAIR PARTS - TORO 461826 1165401-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
354.47 REPAIR PARTS - TORO 461842 1166632-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
328.44 REPAIR PARTS - TORO 461841 1166960-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
731.69
425210 6/7/2018 142608 NAI ARCHITECTS, INC.
500.00 ARCHITECT FOR WEST HANDICAP SE 462281 2018019-01 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
500.00
425211 6/7/2018 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS
223.79 TRAILER REPAIR 462248 2122-338500 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
223.79
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 24
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 -
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425211
425212
6/7/2018
6/7/2018
100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS
132644 NELSON LINDALL, ALICE
Continued...
7.20 ARTWORK SOLD 462047 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
7.20
425213 6/7/2018 130988 NEUENDORF, BILL
384.06 EXPENSE REPORT 462315 05-25-2018 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
409.00 EXPENSE REPORT 462315 05-25-2018 9232.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
792.62 EXPENSE REPORT 462315 05-25-2018 9232.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
1,585.68
425214 6/7/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
199.00 461925 131807 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
211.00 461950 131808 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
231.00 461889 131810 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
524.00 461997 131839 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,165.00
425215 6/7/2018 104350 NIKE USA INC.
219.56 MERCHANDISE 461848 9918846205 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
219.56
425216 6/7/2018 102557 NTOA
598.00 CRISIS NEGOTIATIONS CONE 462126 1992 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
598.00
425217 6/7/2018 117423 O'BRIEN, CHIAKI
24.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462070 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
24.00
425218 6/7/2018 103578 OFFICE DEPOT
54.14 SUPPLIES 461856 138610109001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
54.14
425219 6/7/2018 123786 OLSON, VICKI
18.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462060 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
18.00
425220 6/7/2018 101659 ORKIN
150.40 GRANGE CAHILL PEST CONTROL 462143 170170388 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
R55CKR2
Check #
LOGIS101
Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
,6/7/2018 - 6/7/2018
Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 25
Business Unit
425220 6/7/2018 101659 ORKIN Continued...
30.00 PAMELA EQUIPMENT STORAGE PEST 462145 170172196 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
60.00 HISTORICAL SOCIETY PEST CONTRO 462144 170172197 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
240.40
425221 6/7/2018 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC.
3,025.86 SM. PAINT STRIPPER 461807 45738 1335.6531 SIGNS & POSTS PAVEMENT MARKINGS
3,025.86
425222 6/7/2018 142589 PALKA, YVONNE
17.94 ARTWORK SOLD 462092 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
17.94
425223 6/7/2018 102440 PASS, GRACE
90.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462048 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
90.00
425224 6/7/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY
779.30 461932 12339 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
220.25 461876 12347 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,630.45 461952 12348 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1.25- 462031 12846 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
16.00- 461895 6553-A 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,612.75
425225 6/7/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY
325.94 PEPSI 462044 47991353 5420.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CLUB HOUSE
932.97 PW OPEN HOUSE 462041 73244035 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
568.52- PW OPEN HOUSE (CREDIT) 462042 73244047 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
690.39
425226 6/7/2018 103512 PETTY CASH
5.00 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 462270 20180605PC 1400.4121 OFF-LEASH DOG PARK PERMIT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
13.50 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 462270 20180605PC 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
15.00 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 462270 20180605PC 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
27.00 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 462270 20180605PC 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH
44.35 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 462270 20180605PC 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
55.94 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 462270 20180605PC 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
388.31 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 462270 20180605PC 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
549.10
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 26
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/7/2018 -
Doc No Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425227 6/7/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued...
2,067.74 461986 2365138 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
706.45 461988 2365139 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
117.50 461985 2365140 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
146.38 461989 2365141 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,614.57 462011 2365142 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
117.50 462015 2365143 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,478.01 462019 2365144 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
134.56 462020 2365145 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,091.90 462005 2365428 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
9,474.61
425228 6/7/2018 142581 POTTER, STEPHANIE
134.00 SKYHAWKS FLAG REFUND 462085 053118 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
134.00
425229 6/7/2018 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC
900.00 462186 IN200-1017018 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
900.00
425230 6/7/2018 123377 PROFESSIONAL BEVERAGE SYSTEMS INC.
3,425.00 MAIN STAND ICE MACHINE 462040 43025 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS
3,425.00
425231 6/7/2018 130260 PROFORMA
888.25 NORTH RAMP EXP - VALET 462223 90M5201661 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
888.25
425232 6/7/2018 142588 QUALITY RESOURCE GROUP
448.93 SAFETY VEST 462077 0266437-IN 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS
4,247.15 CLOTHING 462076 1489344 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS
4,696.08
425233 6/7/2018 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC.
138.95 RANGE PICKER REPAIR PARTS 461824 87755 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE
138.95
425234 6/7/2018 142582 RANGER, MICHELE
70.00 FASTAND FLAG REFUND 462086 053118 1600.4390.68 FLAG FOOTBALL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
180.00 FAST AND FLAG REFUND 462086 053118 1600.4390.69 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
250.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 27
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO #
6/7/2018 —
Doc No Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425234 617/2018
425235 6/7/2018
142582 RANGER, MICHELE
104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC.
Continued...
1,00345 461814 6548 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,003.45
425236 6/7/2018 139804 REICHENBACH, EMILY
35.00 REFUND TENNIS #1 462066 052918 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARKADMIN. GENERAL
35.00
425237 6/7/2018 141687 REIKER, PAT
48.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462049 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
48.00
425238 6/7/2018 141554 RESPONDER GEAR INC.
361.15 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 462206 4909 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
361.15
425239 6/7/2018 142586 RINGKOB, JENNIFER
63.00 REFUND TENNIS PARENT/CHILD 462090 060118 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
63.00
425240 6/7/2018 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
946.92 SOFTNER SALT 462099 357787 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
205.12 WATER SOFTENER SALT 461806 357899 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
1,152.04
425241 6/7/2018 100981 ROCHESTER MIDLAND CORP.
2,403.64 YEARLY REST ROOM SANITIZER 461864 INV00043713 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE
2,403.64
425242 6/7/2018 100982 ROTO-ROOTER
658.50 CLEAR MAIN SEWER AND SHOWER 462260 04820241573 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION
658.50
425243 6/7/2018 142573 SAVELL, KRISTIN
134.00 REFUND FLAG FOOTBALL OWEN 462096 053018 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARKADMIN. GENERAL
134.00
425244 6/7/2018 100349 SCOTT COUNTY
548.00 SCOTT COUNTY WARRANT 462212 20180604MM 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 28
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 —
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425244
425245
6/7/2018 100349 SCOTT COUNTY
100995 SEH
Continued..
6/7/2018
548.00
2,910.35 CELL TOWER ENGINEERING 461818 350185 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES
2,910.35
425246 6/7/2018 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP
16,226.50 2018 MS TRUEUP 461893 B08219288 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
16,226.50
425247 6/7/2018 101556 SHRED-IT USA
55.90 SHRED SERVICES 462135 8124825244 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
55.90
425248 6/7/2018 120784 SIGN PRO
250.34 COURSE CONSTRUCTION SIGNAGE 461866 12948 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET
81.00 A-FRAME SIGN 461861 12959 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
13.16 SIGN 462166 12962 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
344.50
425249 6/7/2018 140828 SISK, MINDY
175.80 ARTWORK SOLD 462065 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
175.80
425250 6/7/2018 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC
69.04 CHEMICALS 461840 85921359 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
85.25 IRRIGATION PARTS 461793 85986039 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
26.75 IRRIGATION PARTS 462148 86102824 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE
121.90 WEED SPRAY 462149 86107544 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING
302.94
425251 6/7/2018 103339 SMITH-SHARPE FIRE BRICK SUPPLY
1,660.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES- KILN PARTS 461832 131288 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
1,660.00
425252 6/7/2018 133014 SOCCER SHOTS
3,990.00 SOCCER SHOTS SPRING 461870 05/15/2018 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP
3,762.00 SOCCER SHOTS SPRING 461867 05-15-2018 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP
4,247.50 461874 5/15/2018 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP
4,446.00 461873 5-15-2018 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 — 6/7/2018
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 29
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425252 6/7/2018 133014 SOCCER SHOTS Continued...
5,928.00 SOCCER SHOTS SPRING 461872 INVOICE 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP
05/15/2018
4,332.00 SOCCER SHOTS SPRING 461871 INVOICE 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP
05-15-2018
26,705.50
425253 6/7/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS
50.44 461891 1687817 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,488.87 461877 1687818 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,708.40 461880 1687819 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,771.60 461878 1687820 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,114.00 461882 1687821 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
1,719.97 461915 1687822 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
13,393.81 461983 1687823 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,072.40 461934 1687824 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3.27 461914 1687825 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,322.00 461913 1687826 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,314.20 461933 1687827 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
337.53 461966 1687828 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
7,303.38 461943 1687829 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,584.00 461964 1687830 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,248.80- 461967 1687831 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,248.80 461967 1687831 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,248.80 461967 1687831 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
4,304.00 461965 1687833 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
52,736.67
425254 6/7/2018 141066 SOUTHWEST LAWN & SNOW
1,134.00 LAWN SERVICE 462107 1003 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
126.00 LAWN SERVICE 462107 1003 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
1,260.00
425255 6/7/2018 110977 SOW, ADAMA
57.60 ARTWORK SOLD 462050 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
57.60
425256 6/7/2018 129891 SPACK CONSULTING
8,640.00 TRAFFIC STUDY 462204 5854 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES
8,640.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 — 6/7/2018
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 30
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425257 6/7/2018 130091 SPARTINA 449 LLC Continued...
78.97 MERCHANDISE 461847 IN70680 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
78.97
425258 6/7/2018 134925 STACON
1,129.50 LEVEL TRANSDUCER AND PARTS 462193 IN00082472 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
1,129.50
425259 6/7/2018 101007 STAR TRIBUNE
127.40 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 462100 12416723-5/20 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION
127.40
425260 6/7/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC
125.00 461941 21713 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
125.00
425261 6/7/2018 129409 STEEN, BARB
49.20 ARTWORK SOLD 462051 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
49.20
425262 6/7/2018 142590 STONELAKE, ROGER
1,618.00 AMB REF 39805555 462093 06012018 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,618.00
425263 6/7/2018 142442 STORCK, SUSAN
81.60 ARTWORK SOLD 462071 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
81.60
425264 6/7/2018 142611 STRODL, AMY
60.00 REFUND TENNIS #1 462078 060418 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
60.00
425265 6/7/2018 104932 TAYLOR MADE
356.54 MERCHANDISE 461844 33196701 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET
356.54
425266 6/7/2018 121253 THAYER, LARRY
136.25 MILES 462257 06-05-2018 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING
136.25
425267 6/7/2018 136589 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS INC.
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 -- 6/7/2018
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Page - 31
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425267 6/7/2018 136589 TITAN ENERGY SYSTEMS INC. Continued...
428.00 SEMI-ANNUAL GENERATOR SERVICE 461828 171102-039 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
294.00 SEMI-ANNUAL GENERATOR SERVICE 461827 171102-042 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM
722.00
425268 6/7/2018 128835 TOWN & COUNTRY CLEANING CO. INC.
6,745.00 CITY HALL GLASS 461812 W518 437 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL
6,745.00
425269 6/7/2018 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE
179.25 MAY USAGE 462136 269634-6/18 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
179.25
425270 6/7/2018 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT
93.12 SIDE MIRROR KIT 461977 P92054 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
93.12
425271 6/7/2018 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
470.00 SEED 461795 42314 1642.6547 SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE
705.00 SEED 462150 42371 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE
102.50 SEED FOR WMB AND PLOW DAMAGE 462172 42398 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION
185.00 MULCH 462319 42442 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION
1,462.50
425272 6/7/2018 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN
2,762.50 2018 SOFTBALLS-SUMMER 461907 150-0035153-01 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES
2,762.50
425273 6/7/2018 142587 VAN DER HAEGHEN, CHARLOTTE
120.00 REFUND 462091 060118 7414.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PUBLIC PROGRAMS
120.00
425274 6/7/2018 101058 VAN PAPER CO.
859.32 462254 464658-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
38.11 462255 464660-00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY
652.06 TRASH BAGS 462165 464849-00 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL
1,549.49
425275 6/7/2018 101064 VESSCO INC.
270.00 WALL BRACKET FOR CHEMICAL FEED 462173 73158 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
270.00
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 32
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 —
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425275 6/7/2018 101064 VESSCO INC, Continued...
425276 6/7/2018 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC.
3,456.96 TRACY LIFT AND 72ND 461810 S001498175.001 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
1,083.36 LIBRARY LOT LIGHTS 461817 S001539963.001 1653.6530 REPAIR PARTS SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE
102.15 LOW VOLTAGE WIRE - HORNETS NES 461796 S001543842.001 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
364.49 WIRE FO INVERTER 461978 S001550005.001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
5,006.96
425277 6/7/2018 142574 WAGNER, NICOLE
43.50 CITATION #270618204156 REIMB 462097 05-30-2018 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
43.50
425278 6/7/2018 140473 WALLACE, HARRY
13.20 ARTWORK SOLD 462058 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
13.20
425279 6/7/2018 133515 WASHINGTON COUNTY COURT ADMIN
500.00 WASHINGTON COUNTY WARRANT 462211 20180604DJ 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
500.00
425280 6/7/2018 141991 WEISGRAM, MARY
123.00 ARTWORK SOLD 462057 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
123.00
425281 6/7/2018 142580 WILLIAMSON, LESLIE
158.00 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS REFUND 462084 053118 1600.4390.67 ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
158.00
425282 6/7/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS
1.19 462007 7185476 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
931.14 461990 7185477 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
2,561.32 462021 7185478 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
3,493.65
425283 6/7/2018 130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC
46.99- VGM CREDIT 457153 000062201843 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
2,204.99 FERTILIZER 461825 000062357951 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
21.61- REBATE 450670 62068214 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
62.92- CREDIT 457155 SWS000558896 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
2,073.47
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 33
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
6/7/2018 --
Inv No
6/7/2018
Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425283
425284
6/712018
6/7/2018
130471 WINFIELD SOLUTIONS LLC
118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC.
Continued...
128.97 PPE FOR BALL & LARSON 462134 E1713259.003 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
128.97
425285 6/7/2018 141271 WOLFF, MELINDA
13.20 ARTWORK SOLD 462059 060118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
13.20
425286 6/7/2018 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC.
2,123.50 TRAFFIC STUDY - PENTAGON 462179 R-011952-000-1 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES
940.50 TRAFFIC STUDY - PENTAGON 462180 R-011953-000-1 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES
3,064.00
425287 6/7/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY
53.26 462306 592058911 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS
34.71 462310 592089275 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
29.31 462307 592090551 1646.6185 _ LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE
97.20 462309 592119162 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
14.81 462308 592140044 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
53.52 462312 592767371 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL
14.25 462313 593019411 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE
3,138.50 462305 593305631 5720.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS
205.97 462300 593817822 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
25,026.96 462300 593817822 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
2,613.00 462300 593817822 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
27,827.95 462314 593996285 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS
59,109.44
425288 6/7/2018 114504 XCEL ENERGY
9,844.53 462311 593745210 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL
9,844.53
425289 6/7/2018 122316 ZACK'S INC.
206.57 STREET HAND BROOMS 462127 32756 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE
206.57
425290 6/7/2018 101091 ZIEGLER INC
242.28 COOLANT 462124 PC001973534 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
242.28
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/6/2018 9:01:14
Council Check Register by GL Page - 34
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
6/7/2018 — 6/7/2018
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
425290 6/7/2018 101091 ZIEGLER INC Continued_
425291 6/7/2018 136192 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION
1,017.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
359.25 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
462209 2692883
462208 2693962
1470.6510
1470.6510
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
FIRSTAID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,376.25
1,904,194.22 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Checks 1,842,307.14
A/P ACH Payment 61,887.08
Total Payments 1,904,194.22
CITY OF EDINA 6/6/2018 9:01:24
Council Check Summary Page - 1
6/7/2018 - 6/7/2018
R55CKS2 LOGIS100
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 188,228.35
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 19,494.42
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 4,969.80
05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,262.39
05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,806.46
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,647.86
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,129.04
05500 ICE ARENA FUND 34,958.87
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 6,228.47
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 10,195.28
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 3,786.85
05800 LIQUOR FUND 204,904.96
05900 UTILITY FUND 61,746.40
05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,054.40
06000 RISK MGMT ISF 26,186.59
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 169.00
09210 HRAADMINISTRATION 9,174.00
09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,031,023.73
09235 VALLEY VIEW/WOODDALE TIF DIST 260,000.00
09238 SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 2,472.50
09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,754.85
Report Totals 1,904,194.22
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page - 1
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD
325.00 PRINCESS BALL 460701 AMANDA 4/16 241 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Supplier 142428 IN *PRINCESS PARTY PALS - PCARD
365.08 SANDWCH PROJECT 460700 AMANDA 4/18 242 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
Supplier 130661 COBORN'S - PCARD
106.69 PRINCESS BALL 460702 AMANDA 4/20 243 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
126.21 TRAVELIN' TEENS 460697 AMANDA 4/5 240 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER
Supplier 141122 291 -AMF - EC SOUTHTO - PCARD
49.00 SCHEDULING APP 460779 AMY 4/18 211 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
82.26 460796 ANDERSON 4/16 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
195
82.26 460797 ANDERSON 4/16 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
196
82.26 460798 ANDERSON 4/16 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
197
82.26 460799 ANDERSON 4/16 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
198
82.26 460800 ANDERSON 4/16 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
199
82.26
82.26
460801 ANDERSON 4/16,
200 ,
460802 ANDERSON 4/16
1318.6406
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
201
82.26 460803 ANDERSON 4/16 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
202
82.26 460804 ANDERSON 4/16 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
203
Supplier 131306 RESIDENCE INNS - PCARD
40.86 IPAD CHARGER 460126 ANN 3/31 232 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKADMIN. GENERAL
Supplier 131252 APPLE STORE - PCARD
99.00 460019 BRIAN 4/15 152 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCAR D
45.95 DINNER COMP PLAN 460114 CARY 4/11 292 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 130523 DAVANNI'S -PCARD
390.00 PC CONTINUING ED 460738 CARY 4/20 293 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING
Supplier 131609 GTS EDUCATIONAL EVE -PCARD
16.25- LEARN TO SKATE REFUND 460504 CHAD 3/26 110 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION
16.25- LEARN TO SKATE REFUND 460505 CHAD 3/26 111 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
,. :..
C/TY OF EDINA 6/12/2018 8:45:46
: . , Council Check Register by GL Page - 2
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDiT CARD Continued...
1625- LEARN TO SKATE REFUND 460506 CHAD 3/26 112 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION
16.25- LEARN TO SKATE REFUND 460507 CHAD 3/26 113 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENAADMINISTRATION
Supplier 139263 LEARN TO SKATE USA - PCARD
80.00 DOME TOUR LUNCH 460490 CHAD 3/29 114 5552.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 142418 CROOKED PINT - CHASKA- PCARD
162.29 MICROWAVE 460497 CHAD 4/13 119 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS
Supplier 137190 THE WEBSTAURANT STORE - PCARD
96.76 SALT SPREADER 460496 CHAD 4/14 118 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO'IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
50.00 CHRIS S. BOILERS LICENSE 460492 CHAD 4/2 112 5511.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD
96.74 WELDING EXTENSION CORD 460493 CHAD 4/3 116 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
Stip6Ilei' 130421 THE HOME DEPOT - PCARD
119.50 SOUTH ZAk,1 WATER REEL 460494 CHAD 4/6 117 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT
StIpllsr 133404 MENARDS - PCADD
165.00 CHRIS R SAFE FOOD TRAiNiNG 460.9 CHRISTOPHER 5520.6123 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS
4/24 252
Supplier 122336 SAFE FOOD TRAINING - ?CARD
133.99 RUN REVIEW 460386 CRAIG 3/26 92 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
57.00 DUES 2018 460387 CRAIG 3/29 93 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 137780 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEF - PCARD
80.97 UNIFORMS 460388 CRAIG 4/1 94 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
10.00 FDIC CONFERENCE 460444 CRAIG 4/23 95 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 142415 GOEXPRESSTRAVEL.COM - PCARD
27.57 FDIC CONFERENCE 460445 CRAIG 4/23 96 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134372 NT- IKES MSP 20358776 - PCARD
80.60 FLASH DRIVES (5) 460363 DANIEL 4/17 224 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
62.24 HOLSTER - ROFIDAL 460362 DANIEL 4/17 225 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 142297 VEDDER HOLSTERS - PCARD
56.42 DRE EQUIPMENT 460404 DANIEL 4/24 226 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE
Supplier 142425 5.11 TACTICAL.COM ECOMM - PCARD
2,062.50 APWA MEMBERSHIPS 460767 DAVE 4/24223 5913.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DISTRIBUTION
Supplier 130656 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS - PCARD
530.00- CHIEF CONFERENCE REIMBURSEMENT 460508 DAVID 3/26 44 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130666 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE - PCARD
135.00 DUES FOR ICC MEMBERSHIP 460006 DAVID 3/27 278 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page - 3
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued-.
130651 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC - PCARD
33.87 ROSIN SOLDER 460503 DAVID 3/28 45 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
133.99 VARIOUS COMPUTER ITMES 460509 DAVID 3/29 46 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
9.68 SCRAPER KNIFE TOOL 460502 DAVID 3/29 47 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
29.90 KESTER SOLDER 460501 DAVID 3/31 48 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
75.92 DISPATCH WEEK TREATS 460489 DAVID 4/10 51 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130753 DAIRY QUEEN - PCARD
159.48 DRUG TESTING AMPULES 460500 DAVID 4/11 52 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 141283 NARTEC INC. - PCARD
41.00 CHIEFS CONVENTION - DULUTH 460491 DAVID 4/24 53 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 142413 OMC SMOKEHOUSE - PCARD
500.00 TEDD & JOHN STATE SEMINAR 460007 DAVID 4/5 279 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS
Supplier 141464 EB EAGAN-2012 IBC EXT- PCARD
36.87 TUBING DISPENSER 460498 DAVID 4/5 49 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 132722 ULINE - PCARD
157.84 PENS - CHIEF 460495 DAVID 4/5 50 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 142412 NATIONAL PEN CO LLC - PCARD
39.00 WHEN I WORK CONTRACT 460376 DAWN 4/11 209 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
23.45 GOGURT 460373 DAWN 4/3 206 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD
276.50 CPO TRAINING-ROGER 460374 DAWN 4/4 207 5710.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 133228 HORIZON POOL SUPPLY- PCARD
5.37 GRILL BRUSH 460375 DAWN 4/6 208 5730.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS
Supplier 130362 TARGET - PCARD
21.17 BREAK ROOM SUPPLIES 460189 DEB 4/10 303 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130692 CUB FOODS- PCARD
147.88 BREAK ROOM SUPPLIES 460190 DEB 4/11 304 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD
17.99 460403 DEB 4/12 305 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
Supplier 133402 HIRSHFIELDS - PCARD
58.00 MEMBER BRINDLE TO ULI SEMINAR 460680 DEB 4/17 11 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 130406 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION - PCARD
31.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 460191 DEB 4/21 306 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
48.56 FIRE ONLY SIGN FOR DOOR 460192 DEB 4/24 307 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER
Supplier 130429 SMARTSIGN - PCARD
10.36 MEETING SNACKS 460193 DEB 4/24 308 7410.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PSTF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page - 4
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued-.
130692 CUB FOODS-PCARD
5.18 SOAP 460194 GERALD 3/26 34 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130362 TARGET-PCARD
62.53 RANGE LIGHTBULBS 460195 GERALD 3/26 35 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
Supplier 142411 MARSHALL WOLF AUTOMATION - PCARD
37.75 TOOLS 460196 GERALD 3/26 36 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
41.56 GLOVES 460197 GERALD 3/28 37 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130561 MILLS FLEET FARM - PCARD
170.98- REFUND 460198 GERALD 3/29 38 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
159.98 AMMO 460199 GERALD 3/29 39 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS
Supplier 133101 CABELAS - PCARD
344.18 FIRE TOWER SUPPLIES 460202 GERALD 4/11 42 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER
Supplier 132715 SPS COMPANIES - PCARD
279.43 RANGE MODULE 460203 GERALD 4/21 43 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
Supplier 131272 DIGI KEY CORP - PCARD
107.91 PAINT 460200 GERALD 4/6 40 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
117.70 PILOT LIGHT BULB 460201 GERALD 4/9 41 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 142411 MARSHALL WOLF AUTOMATION - PCARD
19.31 RANGE SUPPLIES 460206 GREG 3/27 121 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
5.58 FIRE TOWER EXPENSE 460205 GREG 3/28 120 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
31.67 RANGE CAULK GUN 460185 GREG 4/11 125 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
62.28 RANGE PAINT 460186 GREG 4/17126 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
211.70 CASTERS 460187 GREG 4/18 127 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 142419 MINNESOTA CASTERS - PCARD
41.94 WATER 460188 GREG 4/19 128 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
192.44 RANGE SUPPLIES 460207 GREG 4/3 122 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
23.24 HINGE, DOOR PULL, INSULATION 460208 GREG 4/5 123 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
69.85 RANGE SUPPLIES 460184 GREG 4/6 124 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
23.66 460090 GREGORY 4/10 89 5842.6496 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
19.95 460091 GREGORY 4/12 90 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page-
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2016 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued..
130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE-PCARD
25.00 460084 GREGORY 4/20 91 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
Supplier 130733 HOLIDAY STATION - PCARD
16.12 460088 GREGORY 4/3 86 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
7.75 460085 GREGORY 4/4 87 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
Supplier 132707 MINNEAPOLIS LOCK AND KEY-PCARD
43.58 460089 GREGORY 4/8 88 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
98.00 FUEL LEVEL SENSOR 460133 GUNNAR 3/26 97 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 142416 CENTROID PRODUCTS INC - PCARD
67.92 FUEL CAP 460134 GUNNAR 3/27 98 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
32.14 TRAILER PINS 460135 GUNNAR 3/28 99 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
31.81 REAR VEIM MIRROR FOR CUSHMAN 460138 GUNNAR 4/10 102 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
495.00 OIL MATS 460139 GUNNAR 4/11 103 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 134371 NPC*NEW PIG CORP - PCARD
143.39 VISE FOR UTILTY TRUCK 460140 GUNNAR 4/11 104 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE- PCARD
59.43 DIODES FOR SWEEPER 460141 GUNNAR 4/14 105 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
93.98 FUEL NOZZLE 460142 GUNNAR 4/18 106 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
31.70 SOLENOID FOR PLOW 460143 GUNNAR 4/18 107 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 131271 WAYTEK - PCARD
19.88 NAME PLATE 460144 GUNNAR 4/20 108 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL- PCARD
416.68 DIFF REPLACEMENT GEARS 460145 GUNNAR 4/23 109 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
500.00 PAYMENT TO HOLD NEW CARS 460136 GUNNAR 4/4 100 421495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS EQUIPMENT
Supplier 142417 WALSER TOYOTA- PCARD
374.25 SPRAY LUBE 460137 GUNNAR 4/9 101 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Supplier 141114 KANO LABORATORIES INC. - PCARD
8.05 KEYS 460679 JASON 11/30 254 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
Supplier 142431 USA TECH-VENDING 31 - PCARD
100.00 LEA DATABASE SOFTWARE UPDATE 460915 JASON 3/26 56 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 141284 LEA DATA TECHNOLOGIES - PCARD
556.44 MEALS FOR SWAT TRAINING 460917 JASON 3/27 57 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 131002 JIMMY JOHNS - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page- 6
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
285.00 KUSKE SOTA 460920 JASON 3/27 58 1401.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM
Supplier 135729 ACT*SPECIAL OPERATIONS - PCARD
20.00 SWAT MEAL TIP 461020 JASON 3/29 59 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 131002 JIMMY JOHNS - PCARD
40.24 SWAT WATER AND GATORAID 460921 JASON 3/29 60 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
15.00 NREMT MKI MELANDER 460922 JASON 3/29 61 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
15.00 NREMT MKI LHEUREUX 460923 JASON 3/29 62 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 136647 NATIONAL REGISTRY EMT- PCARD
209.48 SOTA CONFERENCE HOTEL 460935 JASON 4/10 74 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
209.48 SOTA CONFERENCE HOTEL 460936 JASON 4/10 75 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
209.48 SOTA CONFERENCE HOTEL 460937 JASON 4/10 76 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
209.48 SOTA CONFERENCE HOTEL 460938 JASON 4/10 77 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 131892 BEST WESTERN - PCARD
150.38 IN-SERVICE MEALS 460933 JASON 4/11 72 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 142414 HAMS SANDWICH SHOP - MN - PCARD
33.82 IN-SERVICE SNACKS 460934 JASON 4/11 73 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
118.16 IN-SERVICE MEALS 460939 JASON 4/13 78 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 142414 HAMS SANDWICH SHOP - MN - PCARD
27.44 IN-SERVICE SNACKS 460940 JASON 4/13 79 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
288.40 NTOA FLIGHT WHITE 460942 JASON 4/16 81 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
288.40 NTOA FLIGHT KAPALA 460943 JASON 4/16 82 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130386 DELTAAIR - PCARD
50.00 MNATSA CONFERENCE 460941 JASON 4/17 80 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
650.00 FBI LEEDA CLI BOERGER 460944 JASON 4/19 83 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
650.00 FBI LEEDA CLI MELANDER 460945 JASON 4/19 84 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 140075 FBI LEEDA INC - PCARD
117.39 VAL 3 BUTTON OPENER 460685 JASON 4/2 253 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS
Supplier 142430 PUGLEASA COMPANY INC. - PCARD
250.00 BCA LHEUREUX 460924 JASON 4/2 63 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
250.00 BCA J BEHR 460925 JASON 4/2 64 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD
34.69 IN-SERVICE DRINKS 460926 JASON 4/3 65 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD
202.61 IN-SERVICE MEALS 480927 JASON 4/4 66 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 142414 HAMS SANDWICH SHOP - MN - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 7
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued_
30.13 IN-SERVICE SNACKS 460928 JASON 4/4 67 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
4.49 IN-SERVICE ICE 460929 JASON 4/4 68 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
149.00 A BEHR TACTICS IN TRAFFIC 460930 JASON 4/5 69 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130748 CALIBRE PRESS - PCARD
38.30 IN-SERVICE DRINKS 460931 JASON 4/9 70 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD
250.00 BCA ROFIDAL 460932 JASON 4/9 71 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134736 BCA TRAINING EDUCATION - PCARD
337.03 460461 JEFF 4/10 263 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
Supplier 130377 RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LODGE - PCARD
80.00 460464 JEFF 4/11 264 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
337.04 460460 JEFF 4/12 265 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
168.51 460458 JEFF 4/23 266 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
337.03 460476 JEFF 4/23 267 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
293.95 460477 JEFF 4/23 268 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
Supplier 130377 RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LODGE - PCARD
80.00 460465 JEFF 4/23 269 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
80.00 460462 JEFF 4/4 262 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
212.79 SHIPPING CHARGES 460385 JEFFREY 3/26 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
259
Supplier 130524 THE UPS STORE - PCARD
134.77 NORTH RAMP EXP - WAYFINDING 460488 JENNIFER 3/26 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
129
Supplier 132487 DOLLAR TREE - PCARD
399.00 ARCHIVESOCIAL SUBSCRIPTION 460481 JENNIFER 3/27 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
130
Supplier 136288 ARCHIVESOCIAL.COM - PCARD
53.75 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - CARON 460484 JENNIFER 3/30 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
135
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
18.62 FACEBOOK POSTS 461106 JENNIFER 3/31 1600.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
131
37.14 PROMOTED FACEBOOK POSTS 460487 JENNIFER 3/31 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
132
32.56 FACEBOOK POSTS 461107 JENNIFER 3/31 1600.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
133
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 — 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page - 8
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
43.61 PROMOTED FACEBOOK POSTS 460485 JENNIFER 3/31 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
134
Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD
181.25 MAILCHIMP SUBSCRIPTION 460480 JENNIFER 4/10 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
136
Supplier 135752 MAILCHIMP - PCARD
22.44 REPORTER'S NOTEBOOKS 460474 JENNIFER 4/11 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
137
Supplier 130382 OFFICE MAX - PCARD
53.75 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - EIDSNESS 460483 JENNIFER 4/13 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
139
53.75 ADOBE SUBSCRIPTION - BENNEROTT 460486 JENNIFER 4/14 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
140
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
25.00 FACEBOOK PROMOTED POST 461113 JENNIFER 4/15 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
138
Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD
29.95 FRESHBOOKS SUBSCRIPTION 460467 JENNIFER 4/17 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
1410
Supplier 132480 2NDSITE FRESHBOOKS - PCARD
29.97 POST-ITS 460475 JENNIFER 4/17 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
142
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
58.00 HOT JAR SUBSCRIPTION 460473 JENNIFER 4/17 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
143
Supplier 141643 HOTJAR - PCARD
75.00 GIFT CARDS FOR FOCUS GROUPS 460482 JENNIFER 4/18 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
144
Supplier 131258 STARBUCKS - PCARD
17.66 KEYS 460470 JENNIFER 4/23 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
145
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
68.58 LUNCHES FOR EDINET KICKOFF MEE 460479 JENNIFER 4/23 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS
146
Supplier 131002 JIMMY JOHNS - PCARD
5.29 COOKIES FOR FOCUS GROUP 460469 JENNIFER 4/23 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
147
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
265.00 AWARD PLAQUES 459969 JOSEPH 3/28 260 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page - 9
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
142433 SHOWMARK MEDIA- PCARD
228.08 ACADEMY 9 COGS 459975 JOSEPH 4/24 261 5420.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CLUB HOUSE
Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD
66.95 460383 JOSHUA 3/31 233 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
66.95 460383 JOSHUA 3/31 233 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
66.96 460383 JOSHUA 3/31 233 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
113.61 460384 JOSHUA 3/31 234 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
113.61 460384 JOSHUA 3/31 234 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
113.61 460384 JOSHUA 3/31 234 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD
26.33 460439 JOSHUA 4/21 238 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH ST SELLING
26.33 460439 JOSHUA 4/21 238 5842.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS YORK SELLING
26.34 460439 JOSHUA 4/21 238 5862.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON SELLING
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
725.69 460446 JOSHUA 4/23 239 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY
Supplier 142427 FIRE KING INTERNATIONAL- PCARD
499.00 460436 JOSHUA 4/5 235 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
499.00 460437 JOSHUA 4/5 236 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING
499.00 460438 JOSHUA 4/5 237 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING
Supplier 140733 UNTAPPD INC. - PCARD
53.75 CREATIVE CLOUD 460410 KATHARINE 4/17 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
231
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
63.21 PHOTO AWARD CANVAS 460379 KATHARINE 4/3 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
227
Supplier 142426 EASYCANVASPRINTS.COM - PCARD
58.51 FAMILY FUN NIGHT STICKERS 460815 KATHARINE 4/4 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
228
Supplier 135882 DRI*PRINTING SERVICES - PCARD
9.99 ICONS 460408 KATHARINE 4/5 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
229
Supplier 138384 NOUNPROJECT.COM - PCARD
29.00 SAFETY SIGNS- CPR 460672 KATHARINE 4/6 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
230
Supplier 139339 GETTY IMAGES - PCARD
64.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES 460204 KATHRYN 4/12 54 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE - PCARD
153.02 CONF- CAR 460665 KELLY 3/27 188 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 142422 HOLIDAYCARS.COM - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page - 10
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
9.00 PARKING HP SUMMIT 460666 KELLY 3/28 189 1170.6106 MEETING EXPENSE HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 142423 LEMI MPLSPARKING - PCARD
19.65 LUNCH-CONFERENCE 460671 KELLY 4/17 194 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 130396 MARRIOTT - PCARD
57.22 CONFERENCE- CAR 460670 KELLY 4/18 193 1170.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS HUMAN RESOURCES
Supplier 140968 BUDGET - PCARD
40.00 ERROR/FRAUD LOOKING INTO 460667 KELLY 4/5 190 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
100.00 AFFORD HSG JOB POSTING 460668 KELLY 4/6 191 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
Supplier 142424 MIMA.ORG - PCARD
159.00 AFFORDABLE HOUSING POSTING 460669 KELLY 4/9 192 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES
Supplier 133406 MN COUNCIL OF NONPROFIT- PCARD
325.00- MNCPA COURSE REFUND 459999 KYLE 3/26 168 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE
Supplier 131242 MNSOCIETYCPAS - PCARD
550.00 GFOA BUDGET APPLICATION 460000 KYLE 3/29 169 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE
Supplier 133585 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICE - PCARD
30.65 PAYPAL 460001 KYLE 4/2 170 1160.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES FINANCE
Supplier 130375 PAY FLOW PRO - PCARD
29.99 IDENTITY MONITORING 460002 KYLE 4/2 171 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE
Supplier 138122 IDENTITY GUARD - PCARD
275.40 GFOA CONFERENCE FLIGHT 460003 KYLE 4/2 172 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE
Supplier 130386 DELTAAIR - PCARD
215.40 MCMA MAY CONFERENCE . 461561 LISA 3/27 212 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130415 GRAND VIEW LODGE - PCARD
1,395.76 B/C ANNUAL - DINNER 459977 LISA 4/12 214 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 131250 LUNDS - PCARD
10.00 BOARDS & COMMISSION 460381 LISA 4/3 213 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 138626 YOUCANBOOKME - PCARD
55.03 FRAMES FOR SIGNAGE 459955 MARY 3/29 280 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
Supplier 130739 DISPLAYS2GOCOM - PCARD
145.34 CART GARAGE-PAINT 460021 MARY 3/29 281 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
36.50 BLDG SUPPLIES-CONF. RM 459976 MARY 4/11 285 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
242.64 LOGO PENS 459958 MARY 4/12 284 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 142412 NATIONAL PEN CO LLC - PCARD
10.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES 460015 MARY 4/12 287 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130382 OFFICE MAX - PCARD
48.36 DISPLAYS 460022 MARY 4/14 286 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
Supplier 132317 HOMEGOODS - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page- 11
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
64.81 PEST CONTROL SUPPLIES 460026 MARY 4/16 288 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
180.02 PAINT/CLEANING SUPPLIES 459974 MARY 4/19 2890 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
15.35 PAINT SUPPLIES 459982 MARY 4/19 290 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
53.74 DISPLAYS 460016 MARY 4/21 291 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
Supplier 132317 HOMEGOODS - PCARD
76.52 DEMO NIGHT 459956 MARY 4/5 282 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM
151.94 DEMO NIGHT 459956 MARY 4/5 282 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130760 COSTCO.COM - PCARD
125.21 LOGO PENS 459957 MARY 4/7 283 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 142412 NATIONAL PEN CO LLC - PCARD
39.38 460360 MICHAEL 3/26 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
270
Supplier 130358 AMAZON MARKETPLACE-PCARD
12.99 460784 MICHAEL 3/27 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
271
Supplier 134881 AMAZONRPIME MEMBERSHIP - PCARD
8.54 460359 MICHAEL 3/28 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
272
9.16 460358 MICHAEL 3/30 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
273
15.06 460356 MICHAEL 4/20 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
277
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
11.99 460786 MICHAEL 4/3 274 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
Supplier 130428 GOOGLE - PCARD
16.65 460357 MICHAEL 4f7 275 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
21.86 460785 MICHAEL 4/7 276 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
200.00 JESSICA MGWA CONF 460129 MILLNER 4/11 1263.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENVIRONMENT
295
Supplier 142434 IN *MGWA- PCARD
157.02 COUNT CAM 460130 MILLNER 4/12 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION
296
Supplier 142435 SP * COUNTINGCARS - PCARD
138.31 TUBE ACCESORIES 460131 MILLNER 4/12 1262.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRANSPORTATION
297
Supplier 138042 IN *TIMEMARK INC- PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page - 12
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
122.50 CARTER LICENSE RENEWAL 460150 MILLNER 4/17 1261.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
298
Supplier 130659 BOARD OF AELSLAGID - PCARD
23.05 JESSICAAIS GRANT 460146 MILLNER 4/17 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM
299
Supplier 133592 MCMASTER-CARR - PCARD
122.50 CHAD LICENSE RENEWAL 460132 MILLNER 4/19 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL
300
Supplier 130659 BOARD OF AELSLAGID - PCARD
330.00 COUNTY PERMIT 460147 MILLNER 4/23 01439.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Chowen Park D
301
330.00 COUNTY PERMIT 460148 MILLNER 4/23 01445.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS W 62nd St
302
Supplier 130417 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS - PCARD
76.06 ROSS JJ 460128 MILLNER 4/4 294 1263.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ENVIRONMENT
Supplier 131002 JIMMY JOHNS - PCARD
595.18 TOOLS 460093 NATHAN 3/26 249 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION
Supplier 130736 DEWALT - PCARD
44.95 TRAFFFIC CONTROL SCHOOL 461342 NATHAN 4/11 250 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 134003 WARNING LITES - PCARD
29.39 TOOLS 460097 NATHAN 4/20 251 5921.6556 TOOLS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT
Supplier 130890 SEARS - PCARD
45.91 CARDS FOR SENIOR CENTER 460108 NICOLE 4/17 85 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS
Supplier 140964 CURRENT CATALOG - PCARD
71.00 ELECT PERMIT TOM S OFFICE 460105 NOAH 3/27 244 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Supplier 131007 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR - PCARD
995.00 HVAC AUTOMATION CLASS TK 460109 NOAH 3/28 245 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 142429 SETPOINT SYSTEMS CORPORA- PCARD
35.16 LOCKER PINS 460110 NOAH 4/16 246 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING
Supplier 139865 SNIFFLER EQUIPMENT - PCARD
11.00 PARKING 460111 NOAH 4/18 248 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
Supplier 136630 HAAF MPLSPARKING - PCARD
227.94 LAMPS 460152 NOAH 4/19 247 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Supplier 136752 E-CONOLIGHT - PCARD
27.49 METER RENTAL 460413 PATRICIA 4/11 5710.6235 POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
164
Supplier 130400 PITNEY BOWES - PCARD
99.00 RISK MANAGMENT TRAINING 460414 PATRICIA 4/13 5710.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
165
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Council Check Register by GL
Page- 13
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
130755 MN RECREATION AND PARK -PCARD
189.32 STRATEGIC PLANNING: FOOD 460117 PETER 3/27 204 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 140695 EZCATERWHICH WICH - PCARD
157.97 STRATEGIC PLANNING: FOOD 460118 PETER 3/29 205 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 133224 DICKEYS MN - PCARD
45.00 NICET EXAM 460754 RICK 4/2 166 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
165.00 NICET EXAM 460755 RICK 4/5 167 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 142420 NATL INST CERT ENGR TE - PCARD
79.98- RETURN 460693 ROBERT 3/26 24 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING
Supplier 130424 MICRO CENTER - PCARD
74.65 COMP PLAN MTG 460694 ROBERT 3/28 25 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING
Supplier 130523 DAVANNI'S - PCARD
156.91 BOARD ORIENTATION 460659 ROBERT 4/12 30 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING
Supplier 130374 D BRIAN'S DELI - PCARD
5.98 BOARD MTG 460660 ROBERT 4/12 31 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
.49 NOTARY RECORD FEE 460661 ROBERT 4/24 32 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
20.00 NOTARY RECORD FEE 460662 ROBERT 4/24 33 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING
Supplier 140435 SOUTHDALE SERV CTR - PCARD
200.00 TRENDS SEMINAR 460695 ROBERT 4/4 26 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING
200.00 TRENDS SEMINAR 460696 ROBERT 4/4 27 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING
Supplier 130410 APPRAISAL INSTITUE - PCARD
180.00 SUMMER SEMINARS 460657 ROBERT 4/6 28 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING
180.00 SUMMER SEMINARS 460658 ROBERT 4/6 29 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING
Supplier 130413 MN ASSOC OF ASSESSING - PCARD
276.50 CPO TRAINING 460415 ROGER 4/11 210 5710.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 133228 HORIZON POOL SUPPLY-PCARD
110.00 IT SOFTWARE 460378 RYAN 3/26 148 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 141645 NINITE.COM - PCARD
342.50 IT SUPPLIES 460398 RYAN 4/19 151 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 131597 B & H PHOTO-VIDEO.COM - PCARD
375.00 LYNDA TRAINING 460380 RYAN 4/4 149 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS
Supplier 134136 LYNDA.COM - PCARD
20.00 SHAREFILE DEB 460777 RYAN 4/6 150 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS
20.64 SHAREFILE IT 460777 RYAN 4/6 150 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS
40.00 SHAREFILE DAVE AND JULIE 460777 RYAN 4/6 150 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 139266 NLI*SHAREFILE - PCARD
160.99 GENERAL SUPPLIES - POTTERY 460382 SANDRA 3/28 255 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page - 14
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
11.65 GALLERY-MAILING 460405 SANDRA 4/23 256 5110.6803 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130548 USPS - PCARD
98.78 CRAFT SUPPLIES-CLAY 460912 SANDRA 4/23 257 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
183.30 CRAFT SUPPLIES 461517 SANDRA 4/23 258 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 142432 BIGCERAMICSTORE.COM - PCARD
40.97 MEAL - INDY TRIP 459962 SCOTT 3/2613 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 142409 LOUGHMILLERS PUB & EATERY - PCARD
186.33 MEAL - INDY TRIP 459961 SCOTT 3/27 12 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 142408 HYDE PARK INDIANAPOLIS 23 - PCARD
191.31 CAR RENTAL- INDY TRIP 459965 SCOTT 3/27 14 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 132695 ALAMO RENT-A-CAR - PCARD
34.72 CINCl/INDY TRIP 462321 SCOTT 3/27 15 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 136931 MARATHON PETRO - PCARD
37.10 MEAL - INDY/OH TRIP 459966 SCOTT 3/27 16 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 142410 MAPLEWOOD KITCHEN & BAR - PCARD
9.00 CINCY/INDY TRIP 462322 SCOTT 3/27 17 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130731 MACY'S - PCARD
48.00 CINCY/INDY TRIP 462323 SCOTT 3/27 18 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130520 MSP AIRPORT PARKING - PCARD
6.76 WIRE BRUSH PROP FOR VIDEO 460454 SCOTT 3/29 153 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 131611 JERRYS DO IT BEST HARDWARE - PCARD
50.00 FACEBOOK POST BOOSTS 460455 SCOTT 3/31 154 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
49.93 NORTH RAMP FACEBOOK POST 460455 SCOTT 3/31 154 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT
Supplier 132896 FACEBOOK - PCARD
190.00 3CMAAWARD ENTRIES 460466 SCOTT 4/16 160 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
70.99 TRIPOD BAG 460471 SCOTT 4/18 161 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 131597 B & H PHOTO-VIDEO.COM - PCARD
81.18 MTG: C.FOREST/G.GUY 460703 SCOTT 4/2 19 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 133135 THE ORIGINAL PANCAKE HOUSE - PCARD
78.10 MEAL - RACE & EQUITY MTG 459967 SCOTT 4/2 20 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130523 DAVANNI'S - PCARD
76.67 GOLF OPS/EDINA GOLF ASSC MTG 460698 SCOTT 4/20 23 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130368 EDINA GRILL - PCARD
53.75 CREATIVE CLOUD 460459 SCOTT 4/22 162 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
20.00 MAGC AWARDS DINNER 460472 SCOTT 4/24 163 1130.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 140304 MINNESOTAASSOCIATION OF - PCARD
31.63 MTG: GUITAR CENTER 460699 SCOTT 4/3 21 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier
R55CKR2 LOGIS101
CITY OF EDINA
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Council Check Register by GL
Page - 15
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
130368 EDINA GRILL- PCARD
32.91 460478 SCOTT 4/4 155 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 134733 AMAZON.COM - PCARD
224.28 SCOTT'S PHONE 461652 SCOTT 4/4 22 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130407 SPRINT- PCARD
53.75 CREATIVE CLOUD 460456 SCOTT 4/6 156 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
53.75 CREATIVE CLOUD 460457 SCOTT 4/7 157 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 130360 ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC. - PCARD
246.40 STYLE EDINA RENTAL EQUIPMENT 460463 SCOTT 4/9 158 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 131600 CINEQUIPT - PCARD
64.51 FLASH DRIVE FOR VIDEO RECORDER 460468 SCOTT 4/9 159 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS
Supplier 130424 MICRO CENTER - PCARD
88.00 VOLUNTEER SOFTWARE 459968 SHARON 3/27 175 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 134155 VOLGISTICS INC - PCARD
116.67 B/C ANNUAL-HOTBOX RENTAL 459972 SHARON 4/13 179 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 131250 LUNDS - PCARD
450.00 MJ-COMM ENGAGEMENT 459985 SHARON 4/13 180 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
150.00 MJ-CULTURAL EXPLORATION 459989 SHARON 4/16 181 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 142421 EB TAPPING THE POTENT- PCARD
10.73 FLOWERS FOR B/C ANNUAL 459980 SHARON 4/16 182 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 134381 TRADER JOE'S - PCARD
198.60 COUNCIL MEAL -APR 17 459981 SHARON 4/17 183 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 130679 PINSTRIPES - PCARD
53.64- B/C ANNUAL-HOTBOX RETURN 459973 SHARON 4/17 184 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 131250 LUNDS - PCARD
35.00 CHGFACEOFSO'DALE-NEAL 459984 SHARON 4/19 185 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 133399 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -PCARD
21.34 B/C ANNUAL DRINKS 459979 SHARON 4/23 186 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
1,768.63 VOLUNTEER RECOG DINNER 459978 SHARON 4/23 187 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 142293 44 PIADA EDINA - PCARD
261.18 COUNCIL MEAL -APR 3 459970 SHARON 4/3 176 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 130373 D'AMICO & SONS - PCARD
475.00 IAP2 MEMBERSHIP 461635 SHARON 4/9 177 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
Supplier 130422 PAYPAL - PCARD
35.00 CRITICAL ISSUES FORUM-STEWART 459971 SHARON 4/9 178 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL
Supplier 142292 MINNEAPOLIS REGIONAL CHAM - PCARD
258.58 CONCESSION SUPPLIES 460160 TIFFANY 4/24 55 4075.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VANVALKENBURG
Supplier 138386 SAMS CLUB - PCARD
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
6/12/2018 8:45:46
Page- 16
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
20180509 5/9/2018 129962 US BANK - CREDIT CARD Continued...
43.00 PARKS VACUUM REPAIR 460390 TIM 4/2 173 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Supplier 130741 ORECK FLOOR CARE - PCARD
95.12 PW SUPPLIES 460434 TIM 4/23 174 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
Supplier 136150 S & S SALES CORP - PCARD
19.99- ITUNES APP 460724 TOM 3/11 218 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134734 APL*ITUNES.COM/BILL - PCARD
251.15 TIRES 460805 TOM 3/26 1 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
69.11 SPINDLE ASSEMBLY 460806 TOM 3/28 2 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 138123 JACKS SMALL ENGINES & GEN - PCARD
238.08 LED EXIT LIGHTS 460807 TOM 3/28 3 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
59.99- !TUNES APP 460722 TOM 3/3 216 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
39.97- ITUNES APP 460723 TOM 3/4 217 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134734 APL"ITUNES.COM/BILL - PCARD
69.53 PAINTAND SUPPLIES 460808 TOM 4/11 4 5761.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130404 MENARDS - PCARD
222.14 SHOP SUPPLIES 460809 TOM 4/11 5 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
12.89 REPLACEMENT HEAD 460433 TOM 4/13 222 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
Supplier 130561 MILLS FLEET FARM - PCARD
29.00 SCHEDULING SERVICE 460814 TOM 4/17 6 5760.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
Supplier 135907 WHENIWORK.COM - PCARD
95.20 SWVEL CASTERS 460810 TOM 4/19 7 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
56.27 GENERAL SUPPLIES 460811 TOM 4/19 8 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130404 MENARDS-PCARD
162.95 PAINTING SUPPLIES 460812 TOM 4/19 9 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING
Supplier 130421 THE HOME DEPOT- PCARD
9.99 !TUNES APP 460761 TOM 4/2 215 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
9.99- !TUNES APP 460725 TOM 4/2 219 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 134734 APL*ITUNES.COM/BILL - PCARD
100.00 STAMPS 460813 TOM 4/23 10 5760.6235 POSTAGE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE
Supplier 131250 LUNDS - PCARD
90.18 RUN REVIEW 460756 TOM 4/23 220 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 130411 JERRY'S FOODS - PCARD
315.00 DUES 2018 460760 TOM 4/23 221 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
Supplier 136065 NFPA NATL FIRE PROTECT- PCARD
41,868.50
41,868.50 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 6/12/2018 8:45:46
Council Check Register by GL
Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary
5/9/2018 — 5/9/2018
Page- 17
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
41,868.50 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals
Checks
EFT Payments
Total Payments
41,868.50
41,868.50
CITY OF EDINA 6/12/2018 8:45:51
Council Check Summary Page - 1
5/9/2018 - 5/9/2018
R55CKS2 LOGIS100
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
Company Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND 26,919.43
02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 56.42
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 258.58
04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 660.00
04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 500.00
05100 ART CENTER FUND 454.72
05200 GOLF DOME FUND 76.52
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 1,684.37
05500 ICE ARENA FUND 633.34
05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 197.39
05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 747.31
05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,293.43
05800 LIQUOR FUND 3,115.07
05900 UTILITY FUND 2,732.02
05930 STORM SEWER FUND 23.05
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,984.86
07500 MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 347.29
09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 184.70
Report Totals 41,868.50
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.C .
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eques t F or P urchas e
F rom:Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:R equest for P urc hase: Mic ros oft Enterpris e
Agreement
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve the payment for the third and final year of the Microsoft E nterprise Agreement.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
T his is the final year of a three-year agreement with Microsoft for the licensing of our current (356) E nterprise
S oftware Agreement licenses. T his contract allows the City the ability to upgrade server software and Office
S uite software for its employees for the life of our three-year contract.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Request for Purchase: Microsoft Enterprise Agreement
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Date: June 19, 2018
To: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
From: Ryan Browning, I.T. Manager
Subject: Request for Purchase: Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Renewal
Purchase
Subject to:
☐List Quote/Bid
☒State Contract
☐Service Contract
The
Recommended
Bid is:
☒Within Budget
☐Not Within Budget
Software House International - MN State Contract # 48196 release C1046(5) $50,965.50
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
May 30, 2018 N/A
Company: Amount of Quote or Bid:
Software House International - MN State Contract #
48196 release C1046(5)
$50,965.50
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Page 2
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________
City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Budget Impact
This is the final year of a three-year agreement with Microsoft for the licensing of our current (356)
Enterprise Software Agreement licenses. This contract allows the City the ability to upgrade server
software and Office Suite software for its employees for the life of our three-year contract.
This expense will be paid for out of the General Fund and is within budget. Staff recommends we proceed
with this agreement.
Environmental Impact
This purchase is not expected to have an environmental impact
Community Impact
The Community benefits by achieving standardization, software upgrades for the life of the contract,
priority Microsoft support and city-wide system compatibility.
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.D.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:Jeff Elasky, Deputy C hief of P olic e
Item Activity:
Subject:R equest for P urc hase: O ne 2018 Marked P olic e
Vehic le
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve the purchase of one 2018 marked police vehicle.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
T he P olice D epartment is replacing a marked police vehicle that was in an accident on J une 5, 2018, at X erxes
Avenue and W. 76th Street. T he officer and other driver were not injured. O ur insurance representative declared
the vehicle a total loss. R eplacement of this vehicle does not increase our allotted patrol fleet of 17 vehicles.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
RFP: One Marked Police Vehicle
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Date: June 19, 2018
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Jeff Elasky, Deputy Chief of Police
Subject: Request for Purchase: One 2018 Marked Police Vehicle
Purchase
Subject to:
☒List Quote/Bid
☐State Contract
☐Service Contract
The
Recommended
Bid is:
☐Within Budget
☒Not Within Budget
Nelson Auto Center is not on the state contract, but has the vehicle in stock with requested
specific options and can deliver the vehicle within a few days of approval. The state contract
vendor has a police utility vehicle in stock, but the factory options do not conform to City
specifications and costs $737.45 more than the police vehicle at Nelson Auto Center. If a vehicle
were ordered from the state contract vendor, the City would not receive the vehicle until late fall
of 2018.
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
June 11, 2018
July 11, 2018
Company:
Amount of Quote or Bid:
Nelson Auto Center
2228 College Way, PO Box 338
Fergus Falls, MN 56538
$27,644.00
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Page 2
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________
City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Budget Impact
Replacement of one marked Police utility that was totaled out in a vehicle accident on 6-5-2018:
• Payment will be from the City’s insurance deductible account and the League of MN
Cities, if the City’s deductible has been met.
• Most of the emergency equipment from the totaled vehicle will be reused in the
new squad. Emergency equipment was not damaged in the accident.
• Vehicle is in stock at dealership and the City will not have to wait months to order
from a factory. New vehicle can be added to the fleet within just a few weeks vs. a
few months.
Environmental Impact
The Interceptor utility fuel efficiency is not significantly different from that of the sedan. Taking in
consideration societal and budget impacts, the utility provides the best value for tasks it needs to
perform.
Community Impact
The Utility was chosen for the following reasons:
• Easier to keep emergency first aid equipment at the proper temperature for correct
operation (oxygen and defibrillator).
• More room to carry the necessary equipment required to provide emergency services.
• Vehicle sits high for better visibility while driving in City traffic.
• Better ergonomics for the patrol officer, reducing workman’s compensation claims.
• All-wheel drive and higher frame clearance makes it less prone to getting stuck during
heavy snow events.
• The center console rear cage area and emergency lights are vehicle specific and we have
outfitted our current fleet with Utilities.
• Changing to another vehicle model will cost thousands of dollars per vehicle.
• Ford is discontinuing the sedan in 2019.
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.E.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eques t F or P urchas e
F rom:Don Uram, F inance Director and Kelly C urtin,
Human R esources Director Item Activity:
Subject:R equest for P urc hase: Enterpris e R esource P lanning
(ER P ) S oftware S election C onsultant
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve P rofessional S ervices Agreement with BerryD unn to assist in the selection of a new E nterprise
R esource P lanning (E R P ) system including Finance, Human Resources, and U tility Billing.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
S ee attached Request for P urchase for more detail.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Request for Purchase
HRIS - CIP Project # 17-192
Berry Dunn Contract
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Date: June 19, 2018
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Don Uram, Finance Director
Kelly Curtin, Human Resources Director
Subject: Request for Purchase: Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Software
Selection Consultant
Purchase
Subject to:
☐List Quote/Bid
☐State Contract
☒Service Contract
The
Recommended
Bid is:
☒Within Budget
☐Not Within Budget
BerryDunn will assist staff with the selection of a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
Software System to serve the City’s financial and human resource needs. BerryDunn was
unanimously selected by staff from 25 consultants to assist the City.
Background
At the end of 2011, the City Council authorized staff to reserve funds for a new Human Resource
Information System (HRIS) and for a compensation study. The compensation study was
completed in 2012 but the HRIS project did not move forward because of a lack of staff resources.
With the development of the 2017-2021 CIP, the HRIS was given a high priority ranking by the
prioritization committee. Additionally, staff concluded significant financial and operational benefits
could be achieved by integrating the with a new financial software system, which is also in need of
replacement. The two department currently use five different applications hosted by LOGIS, in
addition to other third-party software programs.
Current Situation
In 2017, staff developed a Request for Proposal (RFP) for system selection based on the City’s
requirements outlined in CIP #17-192 (attached). Staff met with several ERP vendors and based on
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
April 20, 2018 July 20, 2018
Company: Amount of Quote or Bid:
Berry Dunn McNeil & Parker, LLC (BerryDunn)
100 Middle Street
Portland, ME 04101
$59,800.00
Recommended Quote or Bid:
BerryDunn ($59,800)
Page 2
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________
City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only)
the benefits, staff developed a budget and financing plan to replace the HRIS
and Finance systems. Some of the benefits are:
• Lower IT Costs
• Improved access to Information
• Improved Reporting and Planning
• Complete Customization
• Improved Efficiency
• Improved Customer Service
• Improved Collaboration and Workflows
• Improved Data Quality and Accessibility
• Standardized Business Processes
This initiative supports the 2018-2019 Budget Goal # 2 which is “Maintain Service-Levels That
Best Meet the Needs of The Community” and the Budget Objective of “Investing in technology
upgrades to improve data collection, data management, and staff efficiency.” Investing in
technology is critical because it allows staff to more efficiently maintain and locate data for the
public, provide better data and analysis for informed decision-making by elected officials and staff,
and reduces risk of lost data or human error.
Funding
Currently, the City pays LOGIS and other software vendors approximately $300,000 annually for
HR, Finance, and Utility Billing. Based on input from other cities, ERP vendors, and consultants,
staff estimated that the acquisition of a fully integrated ERP would cost between $750,000 and
$1,000,000 plus ongoing annual licensing fees of $50,000 to $75,000. There is currently $120,000
reserved for this project of which $59,800 will be used for this contract. Funding for the
remaining amount ($900,000) is proposed to come from the issuance of a short-term equipment
note with a local financial institution. Repayment of the note will come from a continuation of the
levy amount we currently use to pay LOGIS. Based on these assumptions, it is expected that the
note will be paid off in less than 4 years. Following the repayment of the note, costs associated
with the new ERP system would be limited to annually licensing.
Page 3
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________
City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Budget Impact
The funding source for this purchase is the Construction Fund. This is a new service and there are
no additional costs related to managing this portion of the service.
Environmental Impact
• Effective use of real estate space (gain work space by reducing storage space).
• Reduce trips to and from City Hall for information.
• Potential for significant energy savings and material waste savings through a reduction in
the use of paper, toner, and electricity due to a substantial decrease in the amount of
printing required daily.
Community Impact
• Investing in this technology allows staff to more efficiently maintain and locate data for the
public, and provide better data and analysis for informed decision-making by Council and
staff.
• Improve accuracy and loss due to human error.
• Increase efficiency (managers’ accessibility/time spent getting and maintaining data).
Project # 17-192
Project Name mils
Description
Type New
Useful Life
Category Technology
Priority 2
Status Active
Total Project Cost: $120,000
Implement an I-IRIS system with the ability to manage employee information including employee demographic information, electronic personnel
files and time entry, compensation administration, benefits administration, performance management, and possibly talent acquisition.
The functions of the human resources department are critical to supporting departments citywide. In effort to support departments in the most
effective and efficient manner, the department would greatly benefit from the implementation of a Human Resource Information System (HRIS) to
streamline administrative and transactional tasks not only within the department but also across departments.
Each year, the City hires approximately 10-30 full-time employees and 500 new and returning seasonal employees. Approximately the same
number leaves employment each year. There are also numerous changes to individual compensation, benefits, and other information throughout
the year. The structure of our current systems includes utilizing JDE software for payroll and compensation information, NeoGov for talent
acquisition and onboarding, Apprise for online benefits, and a hosted software managing workplace injuries/OSHA. We also have an
informational benefits portal hosted on Edinet. Using multiple systems does not allow us to easily track, change, and access information in an
efficient manner
In past years the HR Department has taken steps to modernize and streamline HR systems. Previously, most HR transactions (job applications,
time card entry, benefits elections, etc.) required extensive manual tracking. In 2012, the City launched an online applicant tracking system,
NeoGov Insight. In 2015, the City completed rolled out a second phase, NeoGov Onboard, to more efficiently onboard new employees by allowing
new employees to complete new employee paperwork online, resulting in paperless processes.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS:
An HRIS would allow for a significant reduction in the use of paper, toner, and energy as transactions would occur electronically reducing
operating costs as well as environmental impact.
COST CONSIDERATIONS:
It is anticipated that ongoing costs will be approximatley $100,000 per year.
Capital Improvement Plan 2017 thru 2021
Department Human Resources
City of Edina, Minnesota Contact Kelly Curtin
Justification
The benefits of an HRIS affirm the values set forth in Edina IQS. Edina IQS: Integrity- "We wisely use all City resources, including money
equipment and time. We are honest, ethical and transparent in our actions." Quality- "We do accurate, high-quality work. We show initiative by
continuously improving our operations. We take smart risks and look for innovative solutions." Service- "We strive to anticipate the needs of
others and to exceed their expectations."
HRIS provides greater quality by increasing transparency through centralization and self-service. It improves integrity by providing increased
accuracy in transactional tasks and reporting; provides innovative solution to inefficiency. It promotes service as it is more effective service
provided to internal and external customer and in a more efficient manner.
In 2017, the City hopes to take the next step in planning for and implementing a new HRIS, which would alleviate most of our current systems,
with implementation being completed in 2018. Some of the critical components hosted within the HRIS would ideally include electronic personnel
files and timecards, compensation administration, benefits administration, performance management, and possibly talent acquisition.
• Data integration: Data integrity, improved consistency, and redundant data entry is alleviated.
• Reporting: Accurate and consolidated reports on compensation, benefits, performance reviews, disciplinary actions, and other pertinent employee
information. Alleviates the need for manual intervention across multiple systems; reports located in one system.
• Benefits: Streamlines the administration of employee benefits. Will ideally have self-service capabilities to monitor coverage elections.
• Talent Acquisition: Hiring managers and HR work off of one system so there will be faster and more streamlined tracking and evaluation of
applications, resulting in an increased efficiency among supervisors.
• Employee Self-Service: Convenient for employees to view different personnel data, benefits, pay, etc.
• Scalability: Will allow us to function efficiently on a small scale yet as the city continues to grow, we will be able to better keep up with a
growing number of users, transactions and process complexities.
The useful life of an HRIS is anticipated to be ten years.
Page 1 Wednesday, June 13, 2018
Capital Improvement Plan
City of Edina, Minnesota
2017 thru 2021 Department Human Resources
Contact Kelly Curtin
Expenditures 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Software 100,000 100,000
Installation/Maintenance 20,000 20,000
Total 100,000 20,000 120,000
Funding Sources 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Construction Fund: Equipment 100,000 20,000 120,000
Levy
Total 100,000 20,000 120,000
Budget Impact/Other
Page 2 Wednesday, June 13, 2018
196825v1 1
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT made this ________ day of June 2018, by and between the CITY OF
EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City") and BERRYDUNN, an
___________________________ existing under the laws of the State of Maine ("Consultant").
IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE
PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The City retains Consultant to assist in the selection of a
new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system including Finance, Human Resources, and Utility
Billing. Services to be provided are:
A. Project Management
B. ERP System Requirements Planning and Development
C. RFP Development
D. Short-List Identification
E. Preferred Vendor Identification
F. Contract Negotiation Assistance
2. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The following documents shall be referred to as the
"Contract Documents," all of which shall be taken together as a whole as the contract between the
parties as if they were set verbatim and in full herein:
A. This Professional Services Agreement; and
B. Consultant’s Proposal dated April 20, 2018.
In the event of conflict among the provisions of the Contract Documents, the order in which they
are listed above shall control in resolving any such conflicts. Contract Document “A” has the first
priority and Contract Document “B” has the last priority.
3. COMPENSATION. The City shall pay the Consultant and the Consultant shall
accept as payment Fifty-Nine Thousand, Eight Hundred and 00/100 Dollars ($59,800), inclusive of
reimbursable, taxes and all other charges (the “fee”). This fee shall not be adjusted if the estimated
hour to perform a task, the number of required meetings, or any other estimate or assumption is
exceeded. The City shall make payments on the basis of work performed upon receipt of an
invoice from the Consultant. Payment shall be made by the City within thirty-five (35) days of
receipt of an invoice, unless the invoice is disputed.
4. COMPLETION DATE. The Consultant’s work under this Agreement must be
completed on or before December 21, 2018.
196825v1 2
5. OWNERSHIP. All reports, plans, models, software, diagrams, analyses, and
information generated in connection with performance of this Agreement shall be the property of
the City. The City may use the information for its purposes. The City shall have all common
law, statutory and other reserved rights. The City shall not acquire any ownership interest in any
intellectual property (including but not limited to reports, plans, models, software, diagrams,
analyses, and information) that was owned by Consultant prior to the execution of this
Agreement.
6. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders, regardless of amount, must be
approved in advance and in writing by the City. No payment will be due or made for work done
in advance of such approval.
7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS AND REGULATIONS. In providing services
hereunder, Consultant shall abide by all statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations pertaining to the
provisions of services to be provided.
8. STANDARD OF CARE. Consultant shall exercise the same degree of care,
skill, and diligence in the performance of the services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by
a professional consultant under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied,
is included in this Agreement. City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the
accuracy of Consultant’s services.
9. INDEMNIFICATION. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the City,
its officers, and employees harmless from any liability, claims, damages, costs, judgements, or
expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from a negligent act or
omission (including without limitation professional errors or omissions) of the consultant, its agents,
employees, or subcontractors in the performance of the services provided by this Agreement and
against all losses by reason of the failure of said consultant fully to preform, in any respect, all
obligations under this Agreement.
10. INSURANCE. Consultant shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect
Consultant from claims under the Worker’s Compensation Acts, and from claims for bodily injury,
death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this Agreement.
Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than:
Commercial General Liability $1,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate
Professional Liability $1,000,000 each claim
The City shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability policy. Before commencing
work, the Consultant shall provide the City a certificate of insurance evidencing the required
insurance coverage in a form acceptable to City.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains Consultant as an
independent contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. Consultant is not
an employee of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Consultant
shall be responsible for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Consultant shall
196825v1 3
furnish any and all supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Consultant’s performance
under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree that Consultant shall not at any time or in any
manner represent that Consultant or any of Consultant's agents or employees are in any manner
agents or employees of the City. Consultant shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement
for Consultant’s own FICA payments, workers compensation payments, unemployment
compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-employment taxes if any such payments,
amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or regulation.
12. SUBCONTRACTORS. Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for services
provided under this Agreement without the express written consent of the City. Consultant shall
comply with Minnesota Statutes § 471.425. Consultant must pay subcontractor for all
undisputed services provided by subcontractor within ten (10) days of Consultant’s receipt of
payment from City. Consultant must pay interest of one and five-tenths percent (1.5%) per
month or any part of a month to subcontractor on any undisputed amount not paid on time to
subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid balance of One
Hundred and no/100 Dollars ($100.00) or more is Ten and no/100 Dollars ($10.00).
13. CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. In the event of litigation, the
exclusive venue shall be in the District Court of the State of Minnesota for Hennepin County
14. MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. Consultant must
comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it
applies to (1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created,
collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Consultant pursuant to this
Agreement. Consultant is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices
Act, including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes § 13.08, as if it were a
government entity. In the event Consultant receives a request to release data, Consultant must
immediately notify City. City will give Consultant instructions concerning the release of the data to
the requesting party before the data is released. Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold
City, its officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting
from Consultant’s officers’, agents’, city’s, partners’, employees’, volunteers’, assignees’ or
subcontractors’ unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall
survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement.
15. COPYRIGHT. Consultant shall defend actions or claims charging infringement
of any copyright or software license by reason of the use or adoption of any software, designs,
drawings or specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the City from loss or damage
resulting therefrom.
16. PATENTED DEVICES, MATERIALS AND PROCESSES. If the Contract
requires, or the Consultant desires, the use of any design, device, material or process covered by
letters, patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, the Consultant shall provide for such use by
suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed
with the City. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, the Consultant shall indemnify and
hold harmless the City from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such
196825v1 4
patented design, device, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in
connection with the services agreed to be performed under the Contract, and shall indemnify and
defend the City for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such
infringement.
17. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party shall assign this Agreement, or any interest arising
herein, without the written consent of the other party.
18. WAIVER. Any waiver by either party of a breach of any provisions of this
Agreement shall not affect, in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this Agreement.
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. The entire agreement of the parties is contained herein.
This Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the
subject matter hereof, as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between the parties
relating to the subject matter hereof. Any alterations, amendments, deletions, or waivers of the
provisions of this Agreement shall be valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the
parties, unless otherwise provided herein.
20. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason
or for convenience upon giving thirty (30) days written notice to the Consultant. In the event of
termination, the City shall pay the Consultant for completed work.
Dated: __________________. CITY OF EDINA
BY: _______________________________
James Hovland, Mayor
BY: ________________________________
Scott Neal, City Manager
Dated: __________________. __________________________________
BY: _______________________________
Its: _______________________
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.F.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eques t F or P urchas e
F rom:Mark Nolan, AI C P, Transportation P lanner
Item Activity:
Subject:R equest for P urc hase: DART S C irc ulator Bus
S ervic e
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve request for purchase and authorize M ayor and City Manager to sign contract agreement.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
S ee attached request for purchase and contract/agreement.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Request for Purchase with DARTS
Agreement with DARTS
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Date: June 19, 2018
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner
Subject: Request for Purchase: DARTS Circulator Bus Service
Purchase
Subject to:
☐List Quote/Bid
☐State Contract
☒Service Contract
The
Recommended
Bid is:
☒Within Budget
☐Not Within Budget
DARTS ($25,000)
Information/Background:
The service provider will work with City of Edina staff and decision makers to provide a fixed-
route circulator bus service within the City of Edina as a pilot program. The service provider will
provide bus(es), qualified drivers, necessary insurance, licensing and training certification, and
quarterly reporting on ridership. The provider will work with City staff and the Edina
Transportation Commission to evaluate and make adjustments to the route, schedule, fares
sponsorships, etc.
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
June 11, 2018 N/A
Company: Amount of Quote or Bid:
DARTS $25,000.00
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Page 2
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________
City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Budget Impact
The project will be funded through the City’s general tax levy, and has an approved budget of
$100,000. The circulator bus service was recommended in the 2008 Comprehensive Plan and will
be a new service to the City.
Environmental Impact
A primary goal of this service is to provide increased mobility and access for residents and visitors
to the City who can’t or choose not to drive. These trips are often taken in single- or low-
occupancy vehicles (rides from family, etc.). The circulator bus will replace many of these trips
with a higher-occupancy vehicle, resulting in a reduction of energy use and carbon emissions.
Community Impact
As stated above, some segments of the City’s population either are unable or choose not to own
an automobile, (e.g. the elderly, those with disabilities and children) these members of the
community will particularly benefit from the improved mobility and convenience provide by the
circulator bus service. The growing and increasingly active senior population in Edina stands to
benefit from this service.
AGREEMENT
Agreement entered into this 12th day of June, 2018, and covering the period from June 15, 2018
through June 14, 2019, by and between the DARTS and the City of Edina.
Whereas, the City of Edina desires to pilot a transportation method in their City, DARTS will provide a
fixed-route bus circulator that will run at least one weekday per week.
The parties agree as follows:
City of Edina:
1. The City of Edina will lead the communications and marketing of the bus circulator.
2. The City of Edina will identify task force participants and actively participate in the planning
and design of the route.
DARTS:
1. DARTS will provide bus, qualified drivers and all necessary documentation of bus insurance,
driver licenses and training certification. DARTS will also provide quarterly reporting on
ridership.
2. DARTS will regularly (not less than twice per year) convene the Clover Ride Task Force to
discuss measures of success, adjustments to the route, schedule, fares, sponsorships, etc.
Compensation
DARTS compensation for this 12-month pilot program, effective June 15, 2018 through June 14,
2019, will be $25,000.
Method of Payment
The City of Edina will send the compensation amount of $6,250 quarterly to DARTS by the 15th
of the month following the start of the quarter, beginning July 15, 2018 without need of a
request for payment. Remit Payment to:
DARTS
414 South 8th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55404
City of Edina:
By: ______________________________
Mayor
By: ______________________________
City Manager
DARTS:
By: ______________________________
President
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.G .
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:R os s Bintner, P E, Engineering S ervic es Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Master Agreement for P rofessional
Engineering S ervic es with Wenc k Assoc iates Inc.
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Authorize M ayor and City Manager to sign agreement with Wenck Associates, Inc.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
T he City Attorney recommends that we enter into a M aster Agreement for P rofessional E ngineering Services
with all of our consultants.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Master Agreement for Professional Services
MASTER AGREEMENT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
AGREEMENT made between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation,
hereinafter called the "OWNER", and WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC., a Minnesota business
corporation, hereinafter called the "ENGINEER". OWNER intends to secure professional
ENGINEERING services, according to the terms of this Agreement.
1. SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
OWNER intends to secure professional consulting engineering, architectural, planning and/or land
survey services on an ongoing basis for general City services and multiple projects, according to the
terms of this agreement. OWNER and ENGINEER shall enter into project specific supplemental
agreements. This Master Agreement shall be deemed incorporated into the Supplemental Agreements
unless a Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that it is not incorporated. If there is a conflict
between the terms of the Supplemental Agreement and the Master Agreement, the terms of the Master
Agreement shall control unless the Supplemental Agreement specifically provides that despite the
conflict the terms of the Supplemental Agreement apply.
2. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER
2.1 STUDY AND REPORT PHASE / FEASIBILITY REPORT
2.1.1. Consult with OWNER to clarify and define OWNER'S requirements for the Project,
review available data and attend necessary meetings and be available for general consultation.
2.1.2. Advise OWNER as to the necessity of OWNER'S providing or obtaining from others
data or services of the types described in paragraph 4, and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and
services.
2.1.3. Identify and analyze requirements of governmental authorities having jurisdiction to
approve the design of the Project and participate in consultations with such authorities.
2.1.4. Provide analyses of OWNER'S needs, planning surveys, site evaluations and
comparative studies of prospective sites and solutions.
2.1.5. Provide a general economic analysis of OWNER'S requirements applicable to various
alternatives.
2.1.6. The ENGINEER shall conduct and prepare preliminary studies, layouts, sketches,
preliminary field work, preliminary cost estimates, estimates of assessment rates, and shall assist the
1
198015v1
OWNER in obtaining required subsurface investigations as required for the preparation of the
Feasibility Reports. The Feasibility Reports shall conform to the requirements of Minn Stat. Chapter
429 if the cost of the project may be assessed in whole or part. The report shall contain schematic
layouts, sketches and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to indicate clearly the
considerations involved (including applicable requirements of governmental authorities having
jurisdiction as aforesaid) and the alternative solutions available to OWNER and setting forth
ENGINEERS findings and recommendations. This Report will be accompanied by ENGINEER'S
opinion of probable costs for the Project, including the following which will be separately itemized:
construction cost and indirect cost consisting of engineering costs and contingencies, and (on the basis
of information furnished by OWNER) allowances for such other items as charges of all other
professionals and consultants, for the cost of land and rights-of-way, for compensation for or damages
to properties, for interest and financing charges and for other services to be provided by others for
OWNER. The total of all construction and indirect costs are hereinafter called "Total Project Costs".
2.1.7. Furnish five (5) printed copies of the Study and Report documents and one (1)
electronic file and review them in person with OWNER.
2.1.8. The ENGINEER shall assist with presenting the Feasibility Reports to the proper
reviewing agencies and to the City Council. The ENGINEER shall appear at the public hearing to
present the information.
2.2 PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE
2.2.1. In consultation with OWNER and on the basis of the accepted Study and Report
documents, determine the general scope, extent and character of the Project; attend necessary
meetings and be available for general consultation.
2.2.2. Prepare Preliminary Design documents consisting of final design criteria, preliminary
drawings, outline specifications and written descriptions of the Project.
2.2.3. Advise OWNER if additional data or services of the types described in paragraph 4.4
are necessary and assist OWNER in obtaining such data and services.
2.2.4. Based on the information contained in the Preliminary Design documents, submit a
revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs.
2.2.5. Furnish preliminary legal descriptions and exhibits for all permanent and temporary
easements anticipated to construct the Project.
2.2.6. Furnish three (3) copies of the above Preliminary Design documents and one (1)
electronic copy and present and review them in person with OWNER
2.3 FINAL DESIGN PHASE
2.3.1. On the basis of the accepted Preliminary Design documents, the City's design
standards, and the revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs prepare for incorporation in the
2
198015v1
Bidding Documents final drawings to show the general scope, extent and character of the work to be
furnished and performed by Contractor(s) (hereinafter called "Plans") and Specifications.
2.3.2. Provide technical criteria, written descriptions and design data for use in filing
applications for permits with or obtaining approvals of such governmental authorities as have
jurisdiction to approve the design of the Project, and assist OWNER in consultations with appropriate
authorities. The ENGINEER shall submit all applications and permit support data to the appropriate
agencies and submit copies to the OWNER.
2.3.3. Based on property information received from Owner in accordance with Paragraph
4.4, provide legal descriptions and exhibits for all easements, property surveys or related engineering
services needed for the transfer of interests in real property and field surveys for design purposes and
engineering surveys and staking to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with their work.
2.3.4. Advise OWNER of any adjustments to the latest opinion of probable Total Project
Costs caused by changes in general scope, extent or character or design requirements of the Project
or Construction Costs. Furnish to OWNER a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs based
on the Plans and Specifications.
2.3.5. Prepare for review and approval by OWNER, its legal counsel and other advisors
contract agreement forms, general conditions and supplementary conditions, and (where appropriate)
bid forms, invitations to bid and instructions to bidders, and assist in the preparation of other related
documents.
2.3.6. Attend necessary hearings and meetings and be available for general consultation.
2.3.7. Furnish three (3) copies of the listed Final Design documents, including the Plans and
Specifications, and present and review them in person with OWNER.
2.3.8. The ENGINEER shall furnish one copy of all design calculations when requested by
OWNER.
2.4 BIDDING OR NEGOTIATING PHASE
2.4.1. The ENGINEER shall prepare and forward the Advertisement for Bids to the
designated publications, official newspaper and the OWNER. The ENGINEER shall supply up to
thirty (30) sets of full size final Plans and Specifications for use in obtaining bids and submitting for
general review. The ENGINEER shall maintain a record of prospective bidders to whom Bidding
Documents have been issued, attend pre-bid meetings and receive and process deposits for Bidding
Documents.
2.4.2. Prepare Contract Documents.
2.4.3. Issue addenda as appropriate to interpret, clarify or expand the Bidding Documents.
3
9801.50.
2.4.4. Consult with and advise OWNER as to the acceptability of the prime contractor and
subcontractors, suppliers, and other persons and organizations proposed by the prime contractor(s)
(herein called "Contractor(s)") for the portions of the work where acceptability is required by the
Bidding Documents.
2.4.5. Consult with and advise OWNER concerning and determining the acceptability of
substitute materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s) when substitution prior to the award of
contracts is allowed by the Bidding Documents.
2.4.6. Attend the bid opening, prepare bid tabulation sheets and assist OWNER in evaluating
bidder qualifications and recommendations on bids, and in assembling and awarding contracts for
construction, materials, equipment and services.
2.5 CONSTRUCTION PHASE
2.5.1. General Administration of Construction Contract. ENGINEER shall consult with and
advise OWNER and act as OWNER'S representative. All of OWNER'S instructions to Contractor(s)
will be issued through ENGINEER who will have authority to act on behalf of Owner to the extent
provided in the General Conditions except as otherwise provided in writing. The General Conditions
shall not be modified without the written agreement of the OWNER.
2.5.2. Visits to Site and Observation of Construction. In connection with observations of the
work of Contractor(s) while it is in progress:
2.5.2.1. ENGINEER shall make visits to the site at intervals appropriate to the
various stages of construction as ENGINEER deems necessary in order to
observe as an experienced and qualified design professional the progress
and quality of the various aspects of Contractor(s) work. In addition, if
requested by OWNER, ENGINEER shall provide the services of a
Resident Project Representative (and assistants as agreed) at the site to
assist ENGINEER and to provide more continuous observation of such
work. Based on information obtained during such visits and on such
observations, ENGINEER shall endeavor to determine in general if the
work is proceeding in accordance with the Contract Documents and
ENGINEER shall keep OWNER informed of the progress of the work.
2.5.2.2. The Resident Project Representative (and any assistants) will be
ENGINEER'S agent or employee and under ENGINEER'S supervision.
2.5.2.3. The purpose of the ENGINEER'S visits to and representation by the
Resident Project Representative (and assistants, if any) at the site will be
to enable ENGINEER to better carry out the duties and responsibilities
assigned to and undertaken by ENGINEER during the Construction
Phase, and, in addition, by exercise of ENGINEER'S efforts as an
experienced and qualified design professional, to provide for OWNER a
greater degree of confidence that the completed work of Contractor(s) will
4
198015vl
conform to the Contract Documents and that the integrity of the design
concept as reflected in the Contract Documents has been implemented and
preserved by Contractor(s). On the other hand, ENGINEER shall not,
during such visits or as a result of such observations of Contractor(s)' work
in progress, supervise, direct, or have control over Contractor(s)' work, nor
shall ENGINEER have control or charge of and shall not be responsible
for the Contractor(s)' means, methods, techniques, sequences, or
procedures of construction selected by Contractor(s), for safety
precautions and programs incident to the work of Contractor(s) or for any
failure of Contractor(s) to comply with laws, rules, regulations,
ordinances, codes, or orders applicable to Contractor(s) furnishing and
performing their work. Accordingly, ENGINEER can neither guarantee
the performance of the construction contracts by Contractor(s) nor assume
responsibility for Contractor(s)' failure to furnish and perform their work
in accordance with the Contract Documents.
2.5.2.4. If ENGINEER observes or otherwise becomes aware of defects or
deficiencies in the work, or nonconformance to the Contract Documents,
ENGINEER shall promptly give written notice thereof to OWNER.
2.5.3. Defective Work. During such visits and on the basis of such observation, ENGINEER
may disapprove of or reject Contractor(s) work while it is in progress if ENGINEER believes that
such work will not produce a completed Project that conforms generally to the Contract Documents
or that it will prejudice the integrity of the design concept of the Project as reflected in the Contract
Documents.
2.5.4. Interpretations and Clarifications. ENGINEER shall issue necessary interpretations
and clarifications of the Contract Documents and in connection therewith prepare work directive
changes and change orders as required for OWNERS approval.
2.5.5. Shop Drawings. ENGINEER shall review and approve (or take other appropriate
action in respect of) Shop Drawings, samples and other data which Contractor(s) are required to
submit, but only for conformance with the design concept of the Project and compliance with the
information given in the Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action shall not
extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction or to safety
precautions and programs incident thereto.
2.5.6. Substitutes. ENGINEER shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute
materials and equipment proposed by Contractor(s).
2.5.7. Inspections and Tests. ENGINEER shall have authority, as OWNER'S representative,
to require special inspection or testing of the work by Contractor, and shall receive and review all
certificates of inspections, testing and approvals required by laws, rules, regulations, ordinances,
codes, orders or the Contract Documents (but only to determine generally that their content complies
with the requirements of, and the results certified indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents).
ENGINEER shall be entitled to rely on the results of such tests.
5
198015v1
2.5.8. ENGINEER shall respond to all written claims submitted by Contractor in a timely
fashion. ENGINEER shall not be liable for the results of any such interpretations or decisions
rendered in good faith.
2.5.9. Applications for Payment. Based on ENGINEERS on-site observations as an
experienced and qualified design professional, on information provided by the Resident Project
Representative and on review of applications for payment and the accompanying data and schedules:
2.5.9.1. ENGINEER shall determine the amounts owing to Contractor(s) and
recommend in writing payments to Contractor(s) in such amounts and the
OWNER shall verify the amounts. Such recommendations of payment
will constitute a representation to OWNER, based on such observations
and review, that the work has progressed to the point indicated, and that,
to the best of ENGINEERS knowledge, information and belief, the
quality of such work is generally in accordance with the Contract
Documents (subject to an evaluation of such work as a functioning whole
prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent
tests called for in the Contract Documents and to any other qualifications
stated in the recommendation). In the case of unit price work,
ENGINEER'S recommendations of payment will include final
determinations of quantities and classifications of such work (subject to
any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Contract Documents).
2.5.9.2. By recommending any payment ENGINEER will not thereby be deemed
to have represented that exhaustive, continuous or detailed reviews or
examinations have been made by ENGINEER to check the quality or
quantity of Contractor(s)' work as it is furnished and performed beyond
the responsibilities specifically assigned to ENGINEER in this Agreement
and the Contract Documents. ENGINEER'S review of Contractor(s)' work
for the purposes of recommending payment will not impose on
ENGINEER responsibility to supervise, direct or control such work or for
the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of construction
or safety precautions or programs incident thereto or Contractor(s)'
compliance with laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders
applicable to their furnishing and performing the work. It will also not
impose on ENGINEER responsibility to make any examination to
ascertain how or for what purposes any Contractor has used the money
paid on account of the Contract Price, or to determine that title to any of
the work, materials or equipment has passed to OWNER free and clear of
any lien, claims, security interests or encumbrances, or that there may not
be other matters at issue between OWNER and Contractor that might
affect the amount that should be paid.
2.5.10. Contractor(s)' Completion Documents. ENGINEER shall receive and review
maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds and certificates of insurance,
6
1980150.
tests and approvals which are to be assembled by Contractor(s) in accordance with the Contract
Documents (but such review will only be to determine that their content complies with the
requirements of, and in the case of certificates on inspection, tests and approvals the results certified
indicate compliance with, the Contract Documents); and shall transmit them to OWNER with written
comments.
2.5.11. Inspections. ENGINEER shall conduct an inspection to determine if the work is
substantially complete and a final inspection to determine if the completed work is acceptable so that
ENGINEER may recommend, in writing, fmal payment to Contractor(s) and give written notice to
OWNER and the Contractor(s) that the work is acceptable (subject to any conditions therein
expressed), but any such recommendation and notice will be subject to the limitations expressed in
paragraph 2.5.5.
2.5.12. Limitation of Responsibilities. ENGINEER shall not be responsible for the acts or
omissions of any Contractor, or of any subcontractor or supplier, or any of the Contractor(s)' or
subcontractors' or suppliers' agents or employees of any other persons (except ENGINEER'S own
employees and agents) at the site or otherwise furnishing or performing any of the Contractor(s)'
work; however, nothing contained in paragraphs 2.5.1 through 2 5 12 inclusive, shall be construed to
release ENGINEER from liability for failure to properly perform duties and responsibilities assumed
by ENGINEER in the Contract Documents.
2.6 OPERATIONAL PHASE
2.6.1. Provide assistance in the closing of any financial or related transaction for the Project.
2.6.2. Provide assistance in connection with the refining and adjusting of any equipment or
system.
2.6.3. Assist OWNER in training OWNER'S staff to operate and maintain the Project.
Extensive training shall be mutually agreed upon within the Supplemental Agreement as Additional
Services as defined in Section 3 of this agreement.
2.6.4. Assist OWNER in developing systems and procedures for control of the operation and
maintenance of and record keeping for the Project.
2.6.5. Within ninety (90) days after completion of a Project, prepare a set of reproducible
record prints of Drawings and an electronic version that satisfy the City of Edina Record Drawing
requirements, attached hereto, showing those changes made during the construction process, based
on the marked-up prints, drawings and other data furnished by Contractor(s) to ENGINEER and
which ENGINEER considered significant. ENGINEER will not be responsible for any errors or
omissions in the information provided by Contractor that is incorporated in the record drawings and
record documents. Final payment will be made only after record drawings are received by the
OWNER.
2.6.6. In company with OWNER, visit the Project to observe any apparent defects in the
completed construction, assist OWNER in consultations and discussions with Contractor(s)
7
198015v1
concerning correction of such deficiencies, and make recommendations as to replacement or
correction of defective work.
2.6.7. Assist OWNER in preparation of assessment roll for City improvement projects, and
attend assessment hearings.
3. ADDITIONAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SERVICES OF ENGINEER
3.1 SERVICES REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. If authorized in writing by
OWNER, ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from others Additional Services of the types listed in
paragraphs 3.1.1 through 3.1.12, inclusive. These services are not included as part of Basic Services
except to the extent provided otherwise by attached Supplemental Agreement or Work Order and will
be paid for by OWNER as indicated in Section 6.
3.1.1. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (in addition to those furnished
under Basic Services) for private or governmental grants, loans or advances in connection with the
Project; preparation or review of environmental assessments and impact statements; review and
evaluation of the effect on the design requirements of the Project of any such statements and
documents prepared by others; and assistance in obtaining approvals of authorities having jurisdiction
over the anticipated environmental impact of the Project.
3.1.2. Field Services to make measured drawings of or to investigate existing conditions or
facilities, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished to OWNER by others,
including surveys to verify location or improve accuracy of record information provided by
Contractor under Paragraph 2.6.5.
3.1.3. Services resulting from significant changes in the general scope, extent or character
of the Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, OWNER'S
schedule, character of construction or method of financing; and revising previously accepted studies,
reports, design documents or Contract Documents when such revisions are required by changes in
laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, codes or orders enacted subsequent to the preparation of such
studies, reports or documents, or are due to any other causes beyond ENGINEER'S control.
3.1.4. Providing renderings or models for OWNER'S use.
3.1.5. Preparing documents for alternate bids requested by OWNER for Contractor(s)' work
which is not executed or documents for out-of-sequence work.
3.1.6. Investigations and studies involving, but not limited to, detailed consideration of
operations, maintenance and overhead expenses; providing value engineering during the course of
design; the preparation of feasibility studies, cash flow and economic evaluations, rate schedules and
appraisals; assistance in obtaining financing for the Project; evaluating processes available for
licensing; assisting OWNER in obtaining process licensing; detailed quantity surveys of material,
equipment and labor; and audits or inventories required in connection with construction performed
by OWNER.
8
198015v1
3.1.7. Furnishing services of independent professional associates and consultants for other
than Basic Services (which include, but are not limited to, customary civil, structural, mechanical and
electrical engineering and customary architectural design incidental thereto); and providing data or
services of the types described in paragraph 4.4 when OWNER employs ENGINEER to provide such
data or services in lieu of furnishing the same in accordance with paragraph 4.4.
3.1.8. Services during out-of-town travel required of ENGINEER other than visits to the site
or OWNER'S office.
3.1.9. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding or renegotiating contracts for
construction, materials, equipment or services, except when such assistance is required to complete
services called for in paragraph 2.4.
3.1.10. Preparation of operating, maintenance and staffing manuals to supplement Basic
Services under paragraph 2.5.10.
3.1.11. Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for OWNER in any litigation,
arbitration or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Project unless the ENGINEER is
a defendant (except for assistance in consultations which is included as part of Basic Services.
3.1.12. Additional services in connection with the Project, including services which are to
be furnished by OWNER in accordance with Section 4, and services not otherwise provided for in
this Agreement.
3.2 SERVICES NOT REQUIRING ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION. When required by the
Contract Documents in circumstances beyond ENGINEER'S control, ENGINEER shall furnish or
obtain from others, as circumstances require during construction and without waiting for specific
authorization from OWNER, Additional Services listed in paragraphs 3.2.1 through 3.2.5, inclusive.
These services are not included as part of Basic Services except to the extent provided otherwise by
attached Supplemental Agreement. ENGINEER shall advise OWNER promptly after starting any
such additional services which will be paid for by OWNER.
3.2.1. Services in connection with work directive changes and change orders to reflect
changes requested by OWNER if the resulting change in compensation for Basic Services is not
commensurate with the additional services rendered.
3.2.2. Services in making revisions to Plans and Specifications occasioned by the acceptance
of substitutions proposed by Contractor(s); and services after the award to each contract in evaluating
and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable or excessive number of substitutions proposed
by Contractor.
3.2.3. Services resulting from significant delays, changes or price increases occurring as a
direct or indirect result of material, equipment or energy shortages.
3.2.4. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary by (I) work
damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) a significant amount of defective or neglected
9
19801.5v1
work of any Contractor, (3) acceleration of the progress schedule involving services beyond normal
working hours, and (4) default by any Contractor.
3.2.5. Services (other than Basic Services during the Operational Phase) in connection with
any partial use of any part of the Project by OWNER prior to Substantial Completion.
4. OWNER'S PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RESPONSIBILITIES OWNER
shall do the following:
4.1 Designate in writing a person to act as OWNER'S representative with respect to the services
to be rendered under this Agreement, such person shall have complete authority to transmit
instructions, receive information, interpret and define OWNER'S policies and decisions with respect
to ENGINEER'S services for the Project.
4.2 Provide criteria and information as to OWNER'S requirements for the Project, including
design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and
expandability, and any budgetary limitations; and furnish copies of design and construction standards
OWNER will require to be included in the Plans and Specifications.
4.3 Assist ENGINEER by placing at ENGINEER'S disposal all available information pertinent
to the Project including previous reports and any other data relative to design or construction of the
Project.
4.4 Furnish to ENGINEER as required for performance of ENGINEER'S Basic Services except
to the extent provided otherwise by attached amendment, the following•
4.4.1. Data prepared by or services of others, including without limitation, borings, and
subsurface explorations, hydrographic surveys, laboratory tests and inspections of samples, materials
and equipment;
4.4.2. Appropriate professional interpretations of all the foregoing;
4.4.3. Environmental assessment and impact statements, if needed;
4.4.4. Property, boundary, easement, right-of-way, topographic and utility surveys;
4.4.5. Property descriptions; and
4.4.6. Zoning, deed and other land use restrictions;
All of which ENGINEER may use and rely upon in performing services under this Agreement.
4.5 Provide engineering surveys or authorize ENGINEER to establish reference points for
construction to enable Contractor(s) to proceed with the layout of the work.
10
198015v I
4.6 Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER to enter upon public and private
property as required for ENGINEER to perform services under this Agreement.
4.7 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, Drawings, Specifications, proposals and other
documents presented by ENGINEER. Obtain advice of an attorney, insurance counselor and other
consultants as OWNER deems appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions
pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of ENGINEER.
4.8 Prepare applications and provide support for approvals and permits from all governmental
authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from others as may
be necessary for completion of the Project.
4.9 Provide such accounting, independent cost estimating and insurance counseling services as
may be required for the Project, such legal services as OWNER may require or ENGINEER may
reasonably request with regard to legal issues pertaining to the Project including any that may be
raised by Contractor(s), such auditing service as OWNER may require to ascertain how or for what
purpose any Contractor has used the monies paid under the construction contract, and such inspection
services as OWNER may require to ascertain that Contractor(s) are complying with any law, rule,
regulations, ordinance, code or order applicable to their furnishing and perfonning the work.
4.10 If OWNER designates a person to represent OWNER at the site who is not ENGINEER or
ENGINEERS agent or employee, the duties, responsibilities and limitations of authority of such other
person and the affect thereof on the duties and responsibilities of ENGINEER and the Resident Project
Representative (and any assistants) will be set forth in a supplemental agreement.
4.11 If more than one prime contract is to be awarded for construction, materials, equipment and
services for the entire Project, designate a person or organization to have authority and responsibility
for coordinating the activities among the various prime contractors.
4.12 Furnish to ENGINEER data or estimated figures as to OWNER'S anticipated costs for
services to be provided by others for OWNER so that ENGINEER may make the necessary findings
to support opinions of probable Total Project Costs.
4.13 Attend the pre-bid meeting, bid opening, pre-construction meetings, construction progress and
other job related meetings and substantial completion inspections and final payment inspections.
4.14 Give prompt written notice to ENGINEER whenever OWNER observes or otherwise
becomes aware of any development that affects the scope of timing of ENGINEER'S services, or any
defect or nonconformance in the work of any Contractor.
4.15 Furnish, or direct ENGINEER to provide, Additional Services as stipulated in paragraph 3.1
of this Agreement or other services as required.
4.16 Require all Private Utilities with facilities in the OWNER'S right of way to:
(a) Locate and mark said utilities upon request;
11
198015v1
(b) Relocate and/or protect said utilities as determined necessary to accommodate the
proposed Work;
(c) Submit a schedule of the necessary relocation/protection activities to the OWNER for
review.
4.17 Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of this Section 4.
5. PERIODS OF PROJECT SERVICE
5.1 The provisions of Section 6 and the various rates of compensation for ENGINEERS services
provided for elsewhere in this Agreement have been agreed to in anticipation of the orderly and
continuous progress of the Project through completion of the Construction Phase. ENGINEERS
obligation to render services hereunder will extend for a period which may reasonably be required for
the design, award of contracts, construction and initial operation of the Project including extra work
and required extensions thereto.
5.2 The services called for in the Study and Report Phase will be completed and the Report
submitted within the agreed period after written authorization to proceed with that phase of services
which will be given by OWNER.
5.3 After acceptance by OWNER of the Study and Report Phase documents indicating any
specific modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by
OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, ENGINEER shall proceed with the
performance of the services called for in the Preliminary Design Phase, and shall submit preliminary
design documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project Costs within the agreed period.
5.4 After acceptance by OWNER of the Preliminary Design Phase documents and revised
opinion of probable Total Project Costs, indicating any specific modifications or changes in the
general scope, extent or character of the Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization
from OWNER, ENGINEER shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in the Final
Design Phase; and shall deliver Contract Documents and a revised opinion of probable Total Project
Costs for all work of Contractor(s) on the Project within the agreed period.
5.5 ENGINEER'S services under the Study and Report Phase, Preliminary Design Phase, and
Final Design Phase, shall each be considered complete when the submissions for that phase have been
accepted by OWNER.
5.6 After acceptance by OWNER of the ENGINEER'S Drawings, Specifications and other Final
Design Phase documentation including the most recent opinion of probable Total Project Costs and
upon written authorization to proceed, ENGINEER shall proceed with performance of the services
called for in the Bidding or Negotiating phase. This Phase shall terminate and the services to be
rendered thereunder shall be considered complete upon commencement of the Construction Phase or
upon cessation of negotiations with prospective Contractor(s).
5.7 The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the first prime contract to be
executed for the work of the Project or any part thereof, and will terminate upon written
12
198015v1
recommendation by ENGINEER of final payment on the last prime contract to be completed.
Construction Phase services may be rendered at different times in respect of separate prime contracts
if the Project involves more than one prime contract.
5.8 The Operational Phase will commence during the Construction Phase and will terminate upon
the last of the following events: (1) one year after the date of Substantial Completion, as defined in
the Contract Documents, if the last prime contract for construction, materials and equipment on which
substantial completion is achieved; (2) after final payment to the Contractor(s); (3) after all known
issues have been satisfactorily resolved.
5.9 If OWNER requests significant modifications or changes in the general scope, extent or
character of the Project, the time of performance of ENGINEERS services shall be adjusted
equitably.
5.10 OWNER shall give prompt authorization to proceed or not proceed with any phase of services
after completion of the immediately preceding phase.
5.11 In the event that the work designed or specified by ENGINEER is to be furnished or
performed under more than one prime contract, or if ENGINEERS services are to be separately
sequenced with the work of one or more prime contractors (such as in the case of fast-tracking),
OWNER and ENGINEER shall, prior to commencement of the Final Design Phase, develop a
schedule for performance of ENGINEERS services during the Final Design, Bidding or Negotiating
and Construction Phases in order to sequence and coordinate properly such services as are applicable
to the work under such separate contracts.
6. PAYMENTS TO ENGINEER
6.1 PAYMENT. For Project services, ENGINEER will be paid in accordance with the
Supplemental Agreement between the parties for the Project.
6.2 OTHER PROVISIONS CONCERNING PAYMENTS.
6.2.1. If OWNER fails to make any payment due ENGINEER for services and expenses
within thirty five (35) days after receipt of ENGINEER'S statement therefor, the amounts due
ENGINEER will be increased at the rate of one-half percent (1/2%) per month from said thirtieth day,
and in addition, ENGINEER may, after giving seven (7) days' written notice to OWNER, suspend
services under this Agreement until ENGINEER has been paid in full all amounts due for services,
expenses and charges.
6.2.2. In the event of termination by OWNER under paragraph 8.1 upon the completion of
any phase of the Basic Services, progress payments due ENGINEER for services rendered through
such phase shall constitute total payment for such services. In the event of such termination by
OWNER during any phase of the Basic Services, ENGINEER will be paid for services actually and
necessarily rendered during that phase by ENGINEER'S principals and employees engaged directly
on the Project, on the basis of ENGINEER'S Hourly Costs based upon the fee schedule on file with
the City.
13
198015v1
In the event of any such termination, ENGINEER also will be reimbursed for the reasonable
charges of independent professional associates and consultants employed by ENGINEER to render
Basic Services, and paid for all unpaid Additional Services and unpaid reimbursables.
6.2.3. Records of ENGINEER'S time pertinent to ENGINEER'S compensation under this
Agreement will be kept in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Copies will be
made available to OWNER at cost on request prior to final payment for ENGINEER'S services.
6.2.4. ENGINEER shall comply with Minnesota Statute § 471.425. ENGINEER must pay
Subcontractor for all undisputed services provided by Subcontractor within ten (10) days of
ENGINEER'S receipt of payment from OWNER. ENGINEER must pay interest of one and five-
tenths percent (1.5%) per month or any part of a month to Subcontractor on any undisputed amount
not paid on time to Subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty payment for an unpaid
balance of One Hundred Dollars ($100) or more is Ten Dollars ($10).
7. CONSTRUCTION COST AND OPINIONS OF COST
7.1 CONSTRUCTION COST. The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as
"Construction Cost") means the total cost to OWNER of those portions of the entire Project designed
and specified by ENGINEER, but it will not include indirect costs such as ENGINEER'S
compensation and expenses, the cost of land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or damages to,
properties unless this Agreement so specifies, nor will it include OWNER'S legal, accounting,
insurance counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges incurred in connection
with the Project or the cost of other services to be provided by others to OWNER pursuant to
paragraph 4. (Construction Cost is one of the items comprising Total Project Cost which is defined in
paragraph 2.2.6).
7.2 OPINIONS OF COST. Since ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials,
equipment or services furnished by others, or over the Contractor(s) methods of determining prices,
or over competitive bidding or market conditions, ENGINEER'S opinions of probable Total Project
Costs and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of ENGINEER'S
experience and qualifications and represent ENGINEER'S best judgment as an experienced and
qualified professional engineer, familiar with the construction industry; but ENGINEER cannot and
does not guarantee that proposals, bids or actual Total Project or Construction Costs will not vary
from opinions of probable cost prepared by ENGINEER.
8. GENERAL
8.1 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. The City hereby retains the Engineer as an independent
contractor upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Engineer is not an employee
of the City and is free to contract with other entities as provided herein. Engineer shall be responsible
for selecting the means and methods of performing the work. Engineer shall furnish any and all
supplies, equipment, and incidentals necessary for Engineer's performance under this Agreement.
City and Engineer agree that Engineer shall not at any time or in any manner represent that Engineer
or any of Engineer's agents or employees are in any manner agents or employees of the City. Engineer
14
198015v1
shall be exclusively responsible under this Agreement for Engineer's own FICA payments, workers
compensation payments, unemployment compensation payments, withholding amounts, and/or self-
employment taxes if any such payments, amounts, or taxes are required to be paid by law or
regulation.
8.2 TERMINATION. OWNER may terminate this Agreement and any Supplemental
Agreement without cause by written notice delivered to the ENGINEER. Upon termination under
tliii&provision if there is no fault of the ENGINEER the ENGINEER shall be paid for services
rendered and reimbursable expenses until the effective date if termination. If however the
OWNER terminates the A 'cement because the ENGINEER has failed to erform in accordance
thisit A ement o further 'a ment shall be made to the ENGINEER and the OWNER ma
retain another contractor to undertake or com ile he work identified in the Contract Documents.
If as a result the OWNER incurs total costs for the work (including payments to both the present
contractor and a future contractor which exceed t e not to exceed amount specified in the Contract
Documents if an then the ENGINEER shall be responsible for the difference between the cost
actually incurred and the A reement amount.
8.3 DOCUMENTS. All documents including Plans and Specifications prepared or furnished by
ENGINEER (and ENGINEER'S independent professional associates and consultants) pursuant to this
Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the Project and the OWNER will be provided with
information and reference in connection with the use and occupancy of the Project by OWNER and
others; however, such documents are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by OWNER
or others on extensions of the Project or on any other project. Any reuse without written verification
or adaptation by ENGINEER for the specific purpose intended will be at OWNER'S sole risk. If the
OWNER or ENGINEER terminates this Agreement, copies of all files, records, and drawings in
ENGINEER'S possession relating to service performance for OWNER shall be turned over to
OWNER without cost to OWNER.
8.4 MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT. The ENGINEER must comply
with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to
(1) all data provided by the City pursuant to this Agreement, and (2) all data, created, collected,
received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the ENGINEER pursuant to this Agreement.
The ENGINEER is subject to all the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act,
including but not limited to the civil remedies of Minnesota Statutes Section 13.08, as if it were a
government entity. In the event the ENGINEER receives a request to release data, the ENGINEER
must immediately notify the OWNER. The OWNER will give the ENGINEER instructions
concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released and the
ENGINEER will be reimbursed as Additional Public Improvement Services by OWNER under
Paragraph 3.1for ENGINEER'S reasonable costs in complying with a request to release data.
ENGINEER agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold the OWNER, its officials, officers, agents,
employees, and volunteers harmless from any claims resulting from ENGINEER'S officers', agents',
owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or
use of protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this
Agreement.
8.5 INSURANCE
15
198015v I
8.5.1. ENGINEER shall secure and maintain such insurance as will protect ENGINEER
from claims under the Worker's Compensation Acts, automobile liability, and from claims for bodily
injury, death, or property damage which may arise from the performance of services under this
Agreement. Such insurance shall be written for amounts not less than:
Commercial General Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate
Automobile Liability $2,000,000 combined single limit
Excess/Umbrella Liability $2,000,000 each occurrence/aggregate
The OWNER shall be named as an additional insured on the general liability and umbrella policies
on a primary and non-contributory basis. That part of the Excess/Umbrella Liability Insurance limit
in excess of the required Excess/Umbrella coverage may be utilized to supplement and meet the
required limits for Commercial General and Automobile Liability Insurance.
8.5.2. Professional Liability Insurance. The ENGINEER shall secure and maintain a
professional liability insurance policy. Said policy shall insure payment of damages for legal liability
arising out of the performance of professional services for the OWNER, in the insured's capacity as
ENGINEER, if such legal liability is caused by a negligent act, error or omission of the insured or
any person or organization for which the insured is legally liable. Said policy shall provide minimum
limits of $1,000,000 with a deductible maximum of $50,000 unless the OWNER agrees to a high
deductible.
8.5.3. Before commencing work the ENGINEER shall provide the OWNER a certificate of
insurance evidencing the required insurance coverage in a form acceptable to OWNER. The
certificate shall provide that such insurance will not be canceled, reduced, or renewal refused until
at least 10 days prior written notice has been given to ENGINEER and OWNER in the case of
cancellation due to non-payment of premium and at least 30 days prior written notice for any other
reason, or such longer notification periods as may be required by statute. Within three days of
receipt of such written notice, ENGINEER shall provide a copy of the notice to OWNER.
8.6 INDEMNIFICATION. The ENGINEER agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to
indemnify and hold OWNER harmless from any damage, liability, or cost (including reasonable
attorney's fees and costs of defense) to the extent caused by ENGINEER's negligent acts, errors, or
omissions in the performance of professional services under this Agreement and those of his or her
subcontractors or anyone for whom the ENGINEER is liable.
8.7 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS. ENGINEER shall exercise the same degrees of care, skill,
and diligence in the performance of the Services as is ordinarily possessed and exercised by a
professional engineer under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is
included in this Agreement. ENGINEER shall comply with applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, and
regulations and the OWNER's mandated standards that OWNER has provided ENGINEER in
writing. OWNER shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies in the accuracy of
ENGINEER'S services.
16
198015v1
8.8 NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to
give any rights to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER.
8.9 CONTROLLING LAW/VENUE. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, without giving effect to the principles of
conflict of laws. All proceedings related to this contract shall be venued in the Hennepin County
District Court.
8.10 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
8.10.1. OWNER and ENGINEER each is hereby bound and the partners, successors,
executors, administrators and legal representatives of OWNER and ENGINEER are hereby bound to
the other party, to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, executors, administrators and legal
representatives (and said assigns) of such other party, in respect of all covenants, agreements, and
obligations of this Agreement.
8.10.2. Neither OWNER nor ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or transfer any rights under or
interest in (including, but without limitation, monies that may become due or monies that are due)
this Agreement without the written consent of the other, except to the extent that any assignment,
subletting or transfer is mandated by law or the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law.
Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an assignment, no assignment will
release or discharge the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing
contained in this paragraph shall prevent ENGINEER from employing such independent professional
associates and consultants as ENGINEER may deem appropriate to assist in the performance of
services hereunder.
8.10.3. Nothing under this Agreement shall be construed to give any rights or benefits in this
Agreement to anyone other than OWNER and ENGINEER, and all duties and responsibilities
undertaken pursuant to this Agreement will be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the OWNER and
ENGINEER and not for the benefit of any other party.
8.11 PROMPT PAYMENT TO SUBCONTRACTORS. Pursuant to Mimi Stat. §471.25, Subd.
4a, the Contractor must pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of the Contractor's receipt of
payment from the City for undisputed services provided by the subcontractor. The Contractor
must pay interest of 11/2 percent per month or any part of the month to the subcontractor on any
undisputed amount not paid on time to the subcontractor. The minimum monthly interest penalty
payment for an unpaid balance of $100.00 or more is $10.00. For an unpaid balance of less than
$100.00, the Contractor shall pay the actual penalty due to the subcontractor. A subcontractor who
prevails in a civil action to collect interest penalties from the contractor shall be awarded its costs
and disbursements, including attorney's fees, incurred in bringing the action.
8.12 COPYRIGHT/PATENT INFRINGEMENT. ENGINEER shall defend actions or claims
charging infringement of any copyright or patent by reason of the use or adoption of any designs,
Drawings or Specifications supplied by it, and it shall hold harmless the OWNER from loss or damage
resulting there from.
17
198015v1
8.13 NOTICES. Any notice required under this Agreement will be in writing, addressed to the
appropriate party at its address on the signature page and given personally, by facsimile, by registered
or certified mail postage prepaid, or by a commercial cotter service. All notices shall be effective
upon the date of receipt.
8.14 SURVIVAL. All express representations, waivers, indemnifications, and limitations of
liability included in this Agreement will survive its completion or termination for any reason.
8.15 SEVERABILITY. Any provision or part of the Agreement held to be void or unenforceable
under any Laws or Regulations shall be deemed stricken, and all remaining provisions shall continue
to be valid and binding upon OWNER and ENGINEER, who agree that the Agreement shall be
reformed to replace such stricken provision or part thereof with a valid and enforceable provision that
comes as close as possible to expressing the intention of the stricken provision.
8.16 WAIVER. A party's non-enforcement of any provision shall not constitute a waiver of that
provision, nor shall it affect the enforceability of that provision or of the remainder of this Agreement.
9. PRIOR AGREEMENT
This Agreement supersedes all prior written and oral contracts and agreements except for the
following:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first above written.
OWNER:
CITY OF EDINA
BY:
Its Mayor
AND
Its City Manager
ENGINEER•
WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC.
BY:
Its { rest cle
ADDRESS FOR OWING NOTICES:
Chad A. Milkier, PE
Director of Engineering
City of Edina
7450 Metro Boulevard
Edina, MN 55439
ADDRESS FOR OWING NOTICES:
Risk Management Department
Wend( Associates, Inc.
1800 Pioneer Creek Center
P.O. Box 249
Maple Plain, MN 55359
18
198015v1
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.H.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:R os s Bintner, P E, Engineering S ervic es Manager
Item Activity:
Subject:R equest for P urc hase: 2018 S tormwater P rojec ts Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve attached request for purchase.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
R equest for purchase and supplemental letter agreement with Wenck Associates I nc are attached for your review
and approval. N ote, one project is within the Minnehaha Creek Watershed D istrict. Wenck is the watershed
district engineer so an agreement is required from the watershed. T his will be considered at their J une 28 Board
M eeting.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Request for Purchase
Supplemental Letter Agreement
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Date: June 19, 2018
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Ross Bintner PE – Engineering Services Manager
Subject: 2018 Stormwater Projects
Purchase
Subject to:
☐List Quote/Bid
☐State Contract
☒Service Contract
The
Recommended
Bid is:
☒Within Budget
☐Not Within Budget
Wenck Associates, Inc.
Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date:
May 25, 2018
Company: Amount of Quote or Bid:
Wenck Associates, Inc.
$66,789
Recommended Quote or Bid:
Page 2
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Request for Purchase
Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________
City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only)
Budget Impact
This project includes projects from three sources to create an efficiency of scale:
-Capital Improvement Program (CIP) item 17-082 includes stabilization of a stream bank on a road
embankment of Sunnyslope road near Mill Pond. The CIP included $75,000 from the stormwater
utility in 2018.
-CIP item 17-084 includes 3 projects from the 2011 comprehensive water resource management
plan that seems simple and achievable and did not associated with any upcoming street
reconstruction. The CIP included $190,000 from the stormwater utility in 2018.
-Additional scope was added to review a low point in the road at Biscayne Blvd that has generated
notable complaints. This project will be funded from the stormwater utility fund, but the expense
was not planned.
Environmental Impact
The purchase is for a professional service, but the resulting project will use energy and materials in
its construction. Impact to water resources and wildlife habitat during construction are
accounted for and permitted by local and state regulatory bodies.
Community Impact
The project serves the purpose of repairing aging infrastructure, reduce flood risk and improving
drainage flow and soil stability.
-
Wenck Associates, Inc. | 7500 Olson Memorial Highway | Suite 300 | Golden Valley, MN 55427
Toll Free 800-472-2232 Main 763-252-6800 Email wenckmp@wenck.com Web wenck.com
19 June 2018
Mr. Ross Bintner
The City of Edina
4801 W 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Supplemental Letter Agreement for Stormwater CIP projects
Dear Mr. Bintner:
Thank you for the opportunity to provide the City of Edina with this scope of work to complete
technical design, bidding and construction services for the following 2011 Comprehensive Water
Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) projects and to study the Biscayne Boulevard Area. This
proposal is being offered as a Supplemental Agreement to our June 19 , 2018 Master Agreement
for Professional Engineering Services with the City of Edina. We are excited to partner with you
on these stormwater issues. Below is a description of the issues identified and the associated
costs for the scope of work.
We understand the City has a robust feasibility level analysis in place that aided in the
development of these Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) project descriptions (except Biscayne
Blvd which is not identified in the CWRMP). Using this analysis, you seek final design for the
Sunnyslope Road Shoreline Stabilization and the three project areas covered under CIP Project
17-082. You also seek an assessment, feasibility level analysis and development of alternatives
for solution of the flooding issue at Biscayne Boulevard.
We understand that there will be some coordination with residents. Costs for a meeting with
residents for each project location are included if they become necessary. There is also a
possibility that further analysis may show that one or more of the alternatives identified in the
CIP is not feasible and that additional design may be required. Time is included in the scope
should additional design be necessary. Below is a description of the locations identified and the
associated costs for services.
CIP Project 17-082:
The proposed Sunnyslope Road Shoreline Stabilization Project entails stabilizing a ~200 lf
section of the shoreline adjacent to the road on Mill Pond of Minnehaha Creek while maintaining
aesthetics and resident viewshed. This project has the potential to b e a demonstration project.
The cross section for the bank is consistent throughout the project area. The project is within
the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and we act as their District Engineer.
We are at liberty to assist on this project if you believe that Wenck is the best choice to
facilitate the best outcome for the resource, the city infrastructure and the residents. Since we
act as the District Engineer, we are required to receive approval from the MCWD Administrator
James Wisker to participate in projects within the District. It is our understanding that James
would approve our participation at your request.
Ross Bintner
City of Edina
19 June 2018
2
V:\Technical\Scope May 25, 2018_r.docx
The costs include coordination time with the DNR area hydrologist as well as the USACE. Based
on the current solution identified permits should not be required, but close regulatory
coordination is advised. A watershed district permit will be needed. Costs associated with these
tasks are summarized in the table below.
CIP Project 17-084:
o Location 1 near 7709 Stonewood Court (NM494_4): The purpose of the project is to lower
the 100-year flood elevation of a nearby pond to protect adjacent properties from the current
flood risk, protecting the home with the lowest floor elevation (LFE). The CIP identified
replacement of approximately 275 feet of existing 12” storm sewer pipe with 24” storm sewer
pipe on Gleason Road near 78th Street to meet that goal.
o Location 2 near 7411 Coventry Way (SWP_14): The purpose of this project is to lower the
flood risk to adjacent properties. The CIP identified installation of a flap gate in an existing
storm sewer manhole.
o Location 3 near 6309 Post Lane (AH_31): The purpose of the project is to reduce the flow
rate and lower the 100-year flood elevation to protect nearby structures. The CIP identified
replacement of storm sewer control structures nearby to achieve this.
We propose to critically evaluate the solutions proposed in the CIP prior to final design using
Edina’s existing storm water model, survey data, and as-built information. We understand that
some surveying may be necessary to facilitate final design. We understand that some survey
work, if needed, can be provided by the City staff or by Wenck staff.
We will meet with city staff to review final design results. With your approval of a final design,
we will move forward and prepare bidding documents and specifications, support bidding, and
observe construction as needed. The costs include some time for coordination with residents as
well. If additional coordination is needed, it can be provided at the hourly rates listed. Costs
associated with these tasks are summarized in the table below.
Rebecca
Carlson
Eileen
Weigel
Jared
Ward
Roshaan
Greime Expenses Total
Project Task $195 $127 $186 $127
CIP Project 17-082: SunnySlope Road Shoreline Stabilization 7,863$
Data collection, field visit 1 50$ 177$
Staff meeting 1 1 25$ 347$
Meeting with residents 2 25$ 415$
Surveying 4 120$ 628$
Design, Plans, Specs 16 2,032$
Permit coordination 2 6 1,152$
Bidding 2 8 1,388$
Construction support 12 200$ 1,724$
Ross Bintner
City of Edina
19 June 2018
3
V:\Technical\Scope May 25, 2018_r.docx
* Indicates that these tasks will only be undertaken with staff approval, and only if the existing
alternative identified in the CIP is not feasible and development of additional design alternatives
is required.
Rebecca
Carlson
Eileen
Weigel
Jared
Ward
Roshaan
Greime Expenses Total
Project Task $195 $127 $186 $127
CIP Project 17-084:
Location 1 near 7709 Stonewood Court (NM494_4)20,135$
Data collection, field visit 1 50$ 177$
Modeling to verify feasiblity 1 8 1,211$
Staff meeting 1 1 25$ 347$
Surveying 4 120$ 628$
Meeting with residents 2 25$ 415$
Develop alternatives*2 8 20 20$ 3,966$
Design, Plans, Specs 71 9,017$
Bidding 2 8 1,388$
Construction support 12 200$ 1,724$
As-Builts 6 500$ 1,262$
Location 2 near 7411 Coventry Way (SWP_14): 12,957$
Data collection, field visit 1 50$ 177$
Modeling to verify feasiblity 1 8 1,211$
Staff meeting 1 1 25$ 347$
Meeting with residents 2 25$ 415$
Develop alternatives*2 8 12 2,930$
Surveying 4 120$ 628$
Design, Plans, Specs 32 4,064$
Bidding 2 4 880$
Construction support 12 200$ 1,724$
As-Builts 3 200$ 581$
Location 3 near 6309 Post Lane (AH_31): 15,497$
Data collection, field visit 1 50$ 177$
Modeling to verify feasiblity 1 8 1,211$
Staff meeting 1 1 25$ 347$
Meeting with residents 2 25$ 415$
Develop alternatives*2 8 16 3,438$
Surveying 4 120$ 628$
Design, Plans, Specs 48 6,096$
Bidding 2 4 880$
Construction support 12 200$ 1,724$
As-Builts 3 200$ 581$
Ross Bintner
City of Edina
19 June 2018
4
V:\Technical\Scope May 25, 2018_r.docx
Biscayne Boulevard:
This project entails evaluating the localized flooding issues on Biscayne B oulevard at Deville
Drive. The flooding appears to result from a combination of excessive tree litter and sediment
wash-off from the adjacent landscape, and sedimentation at the now-submerged outfall. The
goal is to determine the cause of the flooding and develop alternatives for consideration by City
Council that could reduce or eliminate the flooding. Alternatives would detail work that can be
accomplished by City maintenance staff as well as potential capital improvements. Estimated
costs for each capital improvement option will be provided. The time estimated for engineering
includes presentation at one City Council meeting as well as some coordination with residents.
If an alternative is selected by the City Council, staff would discuss an additional supplemental
letter agreement to complete final design, bidding documents and construction support.
Summary:
We understand that time is critical and that the projects need to be constructed this year.
Below is a summary of the costs anticipated for each project. We will review the alternatives
and meet with City staff prior to preparation of the design plans and specifications. Construction
support and surveying hours beyond what is anticipated in the level of effort tables is available
at an hourly rate $127 + expenses. The table below summarizes anticipated costs for each
project scope described above. The total for the initial tasks is not to exceed $66,789 and
services will be billed hourly and only for charges incurred.
Rebecca
Carlson
Eileen
Weigel
Jared
Ward
Roshaan
Greime Expenses Total
Project Task $195 $127 $186 $127
Biscayne Blvd 10,337$
Data collection, field visit 1 50$ 177$
Modeling to verify feasiblity 1 12 1,719$
Sediment Investigation in
Wetland 4 2 100$ 980$
Surveying 6 120$ 882$
Design alternatives 2 2 1 24 3,878$
Staff meeting 2 2 4 25$ 1,295$
Meeting with residents 3 25$ 610$
Council meeting 3 1 25$ 796$
Cost
CIP Project 17-082: Sunnyslope Road Shoreline Stabilization 7,863$
CIP Project 17-084:
Location 1 near 7709 Stonewood Court (NM494_4)20,135$
Location 2 near 7411 Coventry Way (SWP_14): 12,957$
Location 3 near 6309 Post Lane (AH_31): 15,497$
Biscayne Blvd 10,337$
66,789$
Project
TOTAL
Ross Bintner
City of Edina
19 June 2018
5
V:\Technical\Scope May 25, 2018_r.docx
On behalf of the 275+ employee-owners of Wenck, I thank you for this opportunity to provide
the City of Edina with this scope of work for these CIP stormwater projects. Should you have
any questions or need clarification of anything presented in the attached proposal, please do
not hesitate to call me at 763-252-6824.
Sincerely,
Wenck Associates, Inc.
Rebecca Carlson, P.E. (MN
Principal
If you accept the scope as is, please sign and date below:
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.I.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:C had A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Development C ontract for Edina F lats Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve Development C ontract with Edina Flats, L L C .
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
T his development contract is for the development project at Valley View R d and Kellogg Avenue & Valley View
R oad and O aklawn.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Development Contract
Revised Development Contract June 18, 2018
1
197964v1
(reserved for recording information)
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
CITY OF EDINA
4404 & 4416 VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND
6108, 6112, 6116 AND 6120 KELLOGG AVENUE
AGREEMENT dated _______________, 2018, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota
municipal corporation (“City”) and Edina Flats L. L. C., a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”).
1. BACKGROUND.
A. Developer has applied to develop the following legally described property in the City
of Edina, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”).
B. Contingent upon the authorization by the Metropolitan Council of a Comprehensive
Plan amendment, the City has rezoned the Subject Property to PCD-1, Planned Commercial Development.
A Development Contract is required.
2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise
disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the
following conditions have been satisfied: 1) The City Council has approved the conditional use permit to
allow multi-family residential uses and building setbacks and height variances for the Subject Property; 2)
This Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin
2
197964v1
County Recorder’s Office; 3) The required security has been received by the City; 4) The required insurance
has been received by the City; and 5) The Metropolitan Council has authorized the City to adopt a
comprehensive plan amendment.
3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans
which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the
written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The Plans are:
Final Civil Plans dated February 13, 2018 prepared by Larson Engineering, Inc. (MJW)
Final Landscaping Plan dated March 9, 2018 prepared by Oslund & Associates
Prior to the Developer’s initiating construction, Developer will submit final construction drawings for the work
for the City’s review and approval. Following the City’s approval of those final construction drawings, the
term “Plans” as used in this Agreement will include the approved final construction drawings and in the event
of a conflict between the approved final construction drawings and the above referenced Development Plans,
the approved final construction drawings will control. The Developer may request changes to the Plans. For
Plan changes deemed minor, changes can be reviewed and approved by City staff. All other Plan changes
shall require approval by the City Council.
4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be
implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional
erosion control obligations if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be
stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity.
Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which may include temporary seed
to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc
anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling
erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with
the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may
take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in
3
197964v1
advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights
or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such
work within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any
costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed on the Subject Property and no building permits
will be issued for the Subject Property unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved
Erosion Control Plan.
5. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors
a license to enter the Subject Property to perform (a) all work permitted to be performed by the City under
this Agreement, and (b) all inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development.
6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance
with the Traffic Management Plan.
7. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements: Plaza,
sidewalks, curbs and hydrants as described in the Public Improvement Plans (the “Public Improvements).
The Developer, its successors and assigns shall maintain the Private Improvements in perpetuity. The Public
Improvements and Private Improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standard specifications
and ordinances and the Plans. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are prohibited
between the hours of 9 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. The Plans for Private and Public Improvements shall
be prepared by a competent registered professional engineer and submitted to the City for approval by the
City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to
assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer’s engineer will be able to certify
that the construction work complies with City standard specifications and ordinances and the Plans as a
condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s
expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The
Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all reasonable instructions received from the City’s
inspectors. The Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer’s
engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the
4
197964v1
Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a
mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program
for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Private and Public Improvements
and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible
“as constructed” plans and an electronic file of the “as constructed” plans that satisfy the City’s record
drawings requirements (the “Record Drawings”). The Record Drawings shall be submitted prior to the
Developer receiving an occupancy permit for any building on the Subject Property.
8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is
the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any
necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and
regulations.
9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install the Public Improvements by June 1,
2020.
10. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from the
construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction on the
Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control,
street cleaning, and street sweeping.
11. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required
by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City Engineer, the Public Improvements shall become City
property without further notice or action. Prior to acceptance of the Public Improvements by the City, the
Developer must furnish the following affidavits:
• Contractor’s Certificate
• Engineer’s Certificate
• Developer’s Certificate
certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon
receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed Public
Improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the Public Improvements and before the
5
197964v1
security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible Record Drawings
as described in Section 7. The City’s standard specifications for utility construction identify the procedures
for final acceptance of utilities.
12. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The
Developer shall pay for in-house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include
monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems
regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, Project monitoring during the
warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security.
13. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement,
payment of the costs of all Public Improvements, and construction of all Public Improvements in accordance
with the Plans, the Developer shall, before the Developer may proceed with the construction of the Public
Improvements, furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank
for Eighty Thousand Five Hundred ($80,500.00) Dollars, plus a cash fee of Two Thousand Five Hundred
($2,500.00) Dollars for City engineering administration (the "Security"). The bank shall be subject to the
approval of the City Manager. The City may draw down the Security, on five (5) business days written notice
to the Developer, to cure any violation of the terms of this Agreement which is not cured within said five (5)
business day period. If the Public Improvements are not completed and accepted by the City at least thirty
(30) days prior to the expiration of the Security, the City may also draw it down without notice. If the Security
is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City
that a portion of the Public Improvements has been substantially completed in accordance with the Plans
and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from
time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%)
of the security shall be retained as security until all Public Improvements have been completed, all financial
obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a
warranty security is provided (as set forth in Section 14 below), and the Public Improvements are accepted
by the City Engineer. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures
6
197964v1
for security reductions. If the City has not previously drawn on the Security in accordance with the preceding
sentence, then, upon the Developer’s satisfaction of the conditions precedent to the City Engineer’s
acceptance of the Public Improvements, the City Engineer’s acceptance of the Public Improvements in
accordance with this Agreement, and the Developer’s delivery of the maintenance bonds or other security
as described in Section 14, the City shall return the Security to the Developer.
14. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Public Improvements required to be constructed
by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for all
Public Improvements is one year and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City
Engineer. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final
certified construction costs of the Public Improvements to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten
percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City
or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty
work.
15. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The Developer shall comply with City Resolution 2018-26 and the
Engineering Department Development Review Memorandum dated September 20, 2017.
16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS.
A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction
with the installation of the Public Improvements, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and
inspection expenses incurred in connection therewith, the preparation of this Agreement, and the review of
any other plans and documents related thereto.
B. Except in the case of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers,
employees, and agents, the Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless
from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from
Developer’s installation of the Public Improvements. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers,
employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence
of such claims, including attorneys' fees.
7
197964v1
C. In the event the City is successful in litigation to enforce the terms of this Agreement,
the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in litigation and subsequent enforcement of this
Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees.
D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed
obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not
paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid
within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year.
17. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this
Agreement.
B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of
building permits, including lots sold to third parties.
C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this
Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this Agreement.
D. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of Public Improvements, the
Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Public Improvements and
damage to Public Improvements caused by the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men,
employees, agents, or third parties. No one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on
either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous
surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer.
E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the
provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties
and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to
enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
8
197964v1
F. This Agreement shall run with the Subject Property and may be recorded against the
title to the Subject Property. .
G. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire public liability and property damage
insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of
the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of
them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars
for one person and One Million ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall
be not less than Two Hundred Thousand ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single
limit policy of One Million ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured
on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the
City a certificate evidencing coverage. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given at least ten
(10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The Developer and contractors must
provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements:
(1) The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is
named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto
Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.”
(2) Certificate Holder must be City of Edina.
(3) Provide copy of policy endorsement showing City of Edina named as
Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.
H. The Developer and its general contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation
Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to
the limit of One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars each accident.
I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in
addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City,
at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set
forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be
9
197964v1
deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any
other right, power or remedy.
J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the
City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer
sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it.
K. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of
billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy for and the
halting of all work on, the Subject Property.
L. The Developer represents to the City that the Public Improvements comply with all
city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision
ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Public
Improvements do not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work
on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall
cease work until there is compliance.
M. From time to time, when requested by Developer, the City shall execute and deliver a
recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this
Agreement.
18. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to
be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly
reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as
determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than thirty (30) days in advance.
This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order
for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other
remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part.
19. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand
delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the
10
197964v1
following address: Edina Flats LLC, 3918 Sunnyside Rd, Edina, MN 55424. Notices to the City shall be in
writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care
of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-
1330.
[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.
Signature pages follow.]
11
197964v1
CITY OF EDINA
BY: __________________________________________
James Hovland, Mayor
AND __________________________________________
Scott Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2018, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina,
a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its
City Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
12
197964v1
DEVELOPER:
Edina Flats L. L. C.
BY: ___________________________________
Name: _________________________________
Title: __________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2018, by ____________________________, the _________________________ of Edina Flats L. L. C., a
Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company.
______________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A.
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290
Eagan, MN 55121
Telephone: 651-452-5000
[RNK]
13
197964v1
Exhibit A
Legal Description
14
197964v1
MORTGAGE CONSENT
TO
SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
____________________, which holds a mortgage on the Subject Property, agrees that the foregoing
Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its
mortgage.
Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2018.
____________________
BY: ______________________________________
Its: _________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2018, by __________________________, the _________________________ of ___________________.
________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
15
197964v1
MORTGAGE CONSENT
TO
SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
_______________, which holds a mortgage on the Subject Property, agrees that the foregoing Site
Improvement Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its
mortgage.
Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2018.
_________________
BY: ______________________________________
Its: _________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2018, by ___________________________, the _________________________ of ___________________.
________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
197964v1 16
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT
No. ___________________
Date: _________________
TO: City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330
Dear Sir or Madam:
We hereby issue, for the account of Edina Flats LLC and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in
the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank.
The draft must:
a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 20___, of
(Name of Bank) ";
b) State that Edina Flats LLC is in default, beyond any applicable notice and cure periods, under that
certain Site Improvement Performance Agreement between the City of Edina and Edina Flats LLC;
c) Be signed and sworn to by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina; and
d) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30,
20___.
This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45)
days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written
notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written
notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45)
days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 W.
50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to
the renewal date.
This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended,
amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein.
This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be
made under this Letter of Credit.
This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice
for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600.
We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored
upon presentation.
BY: ____________________________________
Its ______________________________
1
197964v1
REVISED JUNE 18, 2018
(reserved for recording information)
DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT
CITY OF EDINA
4404 & 4416 VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND
6108, 6112, 6116 AND 6120 KELLOGG AVENUE
AGREEMENT dated _______________, 2018, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota
municipal corporation (“City”) and Edina Flats L. L. C., a Minnesota limited liability company (“Developer”).
1. BACKGROUND.
A. Developer has applied to develop the following legally described property in the City
of Edina, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”).
B. Contingent upon the authorization by the Metropolitan Council of a Comprehensive
Plan amendment, the City has rezoned the Subject Property to PCD-1, Planned Commercial Development.
A Development Contract is required.
2. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property, the Developer may not grade or otherwise
disturb the earth, remove trees, construct public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the
following conditions have been satisfied: 1) The City Council has approved the conditional use permit to
allow multi-family residential uses and building setbacks and height variances for the Subject Property; 2)
This Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with both the City Clerk and the Hennepin
2
197964v1
County Recorder’s Office; 3) The required security has been received by the City; 4) The required insurance
has been received by the City; and 5) The Metropolitan Council has authorized the City to adopt a
comprehensive plan amendment.
3. PLANS. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the following Plans
which are on file with the City. The Plans shall not be attached to this Agreement. If the Plans vary from the
written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The Plans are:
Final Civil Plans dated February 13, 2018 prepared by Larson Engineering, Inc. (MJW)
Final Landscaping Plan dated March 9, 2018 prepared by Oslund & Associates
Prior to the Developer’s initiating construction, Developer will submit final construction drawings for the work
for the City’s review and approval. Following the City’s approval of those final construction drawings, the
term “Plans” as used in this Agreement will include the approved final construction drawings and in the event
of a conflict between the approved final construction drawings and the above referenced Development Plans,
the approved final construction drawings will control. The Developer may request changes to the Plans. For
Plan changes deemed minor, changes can be reviewed and approved by City staff. All other Plan changes
shall require approval by the City Council.
4. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating construction, the Erosion Control Plan shall be
implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. The City may impose additional
erosion control obligations if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the grading operations shall be
stabilized per the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity.
Seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification, which may include temporary seed
to provide ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc
anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling
erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the MPCA Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity or with
the Erosion Control Plan or any schedule of supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may
take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in
3
197964v1
advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights
or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such
work within thirty (30) days of receipt of notice thereof, the City may draw on the letter of credit to pay any
costs. No development or utility construction will be allowed on the Subject Property and no building permits
will be issued for the Subject Property unless the Subject Property is in full compliance with the approved
Erosion Control Plan.
5. LICENSE. Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors
a license to enter the Subject Property to perform (a) all work permitted to be performed by the City under
this Agreement, and (b) all inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with site development.
6. CONSTRUCTION ACCESS. Construction traffic access and egress must be in accordance
with the Traffic Management Plan.
7. IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer shall construct the following public improvements: Plaza,
sidewalks, curbs and hydrants as described in the Public Improvement Plans (the “Public Improvements).
The Developer, its successors and assigns shall maintain the Private Improvements in perpetuity. The Public
Improvements and Private Improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standard specifications
and ordinances and the Plans. Grading, construction activity, and the use of power equipment are prohibited
between the hours of 9 o’clock p.m. and 7 o’clock a.m. The Plans for Private and Public Improvements shall
be prepared by a competent registered professional engineer and submitted to the City for approval by the
City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to
assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer’s engineer will be able to certify
that the construction work complies with City standard specifications and ordinances and the Plans as a
condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City’s discretion and at the Developer’s
expense, have one or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a part-time basis. The
Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all reasonable instructions received from the City’s
inspectors. The Developer’s engineer shall provide for on-site project management. The Developer’s
engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the
4
197964v1
Developer’s contractor. The Developer or its engineer shall schedule a pre-construction meeting at a
mutually agreeable time at the City with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program
for the construction work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Private and Public Improvements
and before the security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible
“as constructed” plans and an electronic file of the “as constructed” plans that satisfy the City’s record
drawings requirements (the “Record Drawings”). The Record Drawings shall be submitted prior to the
Developer receiving an occupancy permit for any building on the Subject Property.
8. DEWATERING. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and stormwater flows, it is
the Developer’s responsibility to satisfy itself with regard to the elevation of groundwater and to perform any
necessary dewatering and storm flow routing. All dewatering shall be in accordance with applicable laws and
regulations.
9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install the Public Improvements by June 1,
2020.
10. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from the
construction work by the Developer, subcontractors, their agents or assigns. Prior to any construction on the
Subject Property, the Developer shall identify in writing a responsible party and schedule for erosion control,
street cleaning, and street sweeping.
11. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required
by this Agreement and final acceptance by the City Engineer, the Public Improvements shall become City
property without further notice or action. Prior to acceptance of the Public Improvements by the City, the
Developer must furnish the following affidavits:
• Contractor’s Certificate
• Engineer’s Certificate
• Developer’s Certificate
certifying that all construction has been completed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon
receipt of affidavits and verification by the City Engineer, the City Engineer will accept the completed Public
Improvements. Within thirty (30) days after the acceptance of the Public Improvements and before the
5
197964v1
security is released, the Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible Record Drawings
as described in Section 7. The City’s standard specifications for utility construction identify the procedures
for final acceptance of utilities.
12. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The
Developer shall pay for in-house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include
monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and its engineer on status or problems
regarding the Project, coordination for final inspection and acceptance, Project monitoring during the
warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security.
13. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this Agreement,
payment of the costs of all Public Improvements, and construction of all Public Improvements in accordance
with the Plans, the Developer shall, before the Developer may proceed with the construction of the Public
Improvements, furnish the City with a cash escrow or letter of credit in the form attached hereto, from a bank
for Eighty Thousand Five Hundred ($80,500.00) Dollars, plus a cash fee of Two Thousand Five Hundred
($2,500.00) Dollars for City engineering administration (the "Security"). The bank shall be subject to the
approval of the City Manager. The City may draw down the Security, on five (5) business days written notice
to the Developer, to cure any violation of the terms of this Agreement which is not cured within said five (5)
business day period. If the Public Improvements are not completed and accepted by the City at least thirty
(30) days prior to the expiration of the Security, the City may also draw it down without notice. If the Security
is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City
that a portion of the Public Improvements has been substantially completed in accordance with the Plans
and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval the security may be reduced from
time to time by ninety percent (90%) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Ten percent (10%)
of the security shall be retained as security until all Public Improvements have been completed, all financial
obligations to the City satisfied, the required "as constructed" plans have been received by the City, a
warranty security is provided (as set forth in Section 14 below), and the Public Improvements are accepted
by the City Engineer. The City’s standard specifications for utility and street construction outline procedures
6
197964v1
for security reductions. If the City has not previously drawn on the Security in accordance with the preceding
sentence, then, upon the Developer’s satisfaction of the conditions precedent to the City Engineer’s
acceptance of the Public Improvements, the City Engineer’s acceptance of the Public Improvements in
accordance with this Agreement, and the Developer’s delivery of the maintenance bonds or other security
as described in Section 14, the City shall return the Security to the Developer.
14. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all Public Improvements required to be constructed
by it pursuant to this Agreement against poor material and faulty workmanship. The warranty period for all
Public Improvements is one year and shall commence following completion and acceptance by City
Engineer. The Developer shall post maintenance bonds in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of final
certified construction costs of the Public Improvements to secure the warranties. The City shall retain ten
percent (10%) of the security posted by the Developer until the maintenance bonds are furnished to the City
or until the warranty period expires, whichever first occurs. The retainage may be used to pay for warranty
work.
15. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The Developer shall comply with City Resolution 2018-26 and the
Engineering Department Development Review Memorandum dated September 20, 2017.
16. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS.
A. The Developer shall pay all reasonable costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction
with the installation of the Public Improvements, including but not limited to legal, planning, engineering and
inspection expenses incurred in connection therewith, the preparation of this Agreement, and the review of
any other plans and documents related thereto.
B. Except in the case of the negligence or willful misconduct of the City or its officers,
employees, and agents, the Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless
from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from
Developer’s installation of the Public Improvements. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers,
employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence
of such claims, including attorneys' fees.
7
197964v1
C. In the event the City is successful in litigation to enforce the terms of this Agreement,
the Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in litigation and subsequent enforcement of this
Agreement, including reasonable engineering and attorneys' fees.
D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for undisputed
obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the undisputed bills are not
paid on time, the City may halt site development and construction until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid
within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per year.
17. MISCELLANEOUS.
A. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City or the Developer under this
Agreement.
B. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for denial of
building permits, including lots sold to third parties.
C. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this
Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
of this Agreement.
D. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of Public Improvements, the
Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of Public Improvements and
damage to Public Improvements caused by the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, material men,
employees, agents, or third parties. No one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on
either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous
surface and the utilities are accepted by the City Engineer.
E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the
provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties
and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to
enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
8
197964v1
F. This Agreement shall run with the Subject Property and may be recorded against the
title to the Subject Property. .
G. The Developer and its contractors shall acquire public liability and property damage
insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of
the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of
them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars
for one person and One Million ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall
be not less than Two Hundred Thousand ($200,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence; or a combination single
limit policy of One Million ($1,000,000.00) Dollars or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured
on the policy on a primary and noncontributory basis, and the Developer and contractors shall file with the
City a certificate evidencing coverage. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given at least ten
(10) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. The Developer and contractors must
provide a Certificate of Insurance which meets the following requirements:
(1) The Description section of the Accord form needs to read “City of Edina is
named as Additional Insured with respect to the General Liability and Auto
Liability policies on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.”
(2) Certificate Holder must be City of Edina.
(3) Provide copy of policy endorsement showing City of Edina named as
Additional Insured on a Primary and Non-Contributory Basis.
H. The Developer and its general contractor shall obtain Workmen’s Compensation
Insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, including Employer’s Liability Insurance, to
the limit of One Hundred Thousand ($100,000.00) Dollars each accident.
I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in
addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City,
at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set
forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be
9
197964v1
deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any
other right, power or remedy.
J. The Developer may not assign this Agreement without the written permission of the
City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer
sells one or more lots, the entire Subject Property, or any part of it.
K. Breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer, including nonpayment of
billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits and certificates of occupancy for and the
halting of all work on, the Subject Property.
L. The Developer represents to the City that the Public Improvements comply with all
city, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision
ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Public
Improvements do not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work
on the Subject Property until the Developer does comply. Upon the City’s demand, the Developer shall
cease work until there is compliance.
M. From time to time, when requested by Developer, the City shall execute and deliver a
recordable certificate confirming the satisfaction or completion of certain requirements contained in this
Agreement.
18. DEVELOPER’S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to
be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly
reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as
determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than thirty (30) days in advance.
This Agreement is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order
for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other
remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part.
19. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand
delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the
10
197964v1
following address: Edina Flats LLC, 3918 Sunnyside Rd, Edina, MN 55424. Notices to the City shall be in
writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care
of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424-
1330.
[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.
Signature pages follow.]
11
197964v1
CITY OF EDINA
BY: __________________________________________
James Hovland, Mayor
AND __________________________________________
Scott Neal, City Manager
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2018, by James Hovland and by Scott Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina,
a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its
City Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
12
197964v1
DEVELOPER:
Edina Flats L. L. C.
BY: ___________________________________
Name: _________________________________
Title: __________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2018, by ____________________________, the _________________________ of Edina Flats L. L. C., a
Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company.
______________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON, P.A.
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290
Eagan, MN 55121
Telephone: 651-452-5000
[RNK]
13
197964v1
Exhibit A
Legal Description
Hennepin County PID No: Property Address: Legal Description:
19.028.24.42.0061 4416 Valley View Road Lot 9, Block 21, Fairfax
Hennepin County, Minnesota
19.028.24.42.0060 4416 Valley View Road Lot 8, Block 21, Fairfax
Hennepin County, Minnesota
A portion of
19.028.24.43.0119
4420 Valley View Road Lot 7, Block 21, Fairfax
Hennepin County, Minnesota
19.028.24.43.0076 4404 Valley View Road Lots 11 and 12, Block 22, Fairfax
Hennepin County, Minnesota
19.028.24.43.0058 6120 Kellogg Avenue Lot 6, Block 21, Fairfax
Hennepin County, Minnesota
19.028.24.43.0057 6116 Kellogg Avenue Lot 5, Block 21, Fairfax
Hennepin County, Minnesota
19.028.24.43.0056 6112 Kellogg Avenue Lot 4, Block 21, Fairfax
Hennepin County, Minnesota
19.028.24.43.0055 6108 Kellogg Avenue Lot 3, Block 21, Fairfax
Hennepin County, Minnesota
14
197964v1
MORTGAGE CONSENT
TO
SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
____________________, which holds a mortgage on the Subject Property, agrees that the foregoing
Site Improvement Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its
mortgage.
Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2018.
____________________
BY: ______________________________________
Its: _________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2018, by __________________________, the _________________________ of ___________________.
________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
15
197964v1
MORTGAGE CONSENT
TO
SITE IMPROVEMENT PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT
_______________, which holds a mortgage on the Subject Property, agrees that the foregoing Site
Improvement Performance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its
mortgage.
Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2018.
_________________
BY: ______________________________________
Its: _________________________________
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF __________ )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of ______________,
2018, by ___________________________, the _________________________ of ___________________.
________________________________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
197964v1 16
IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT
No. ___________________
Date: _________________
TO: City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424-1330
Dear Sir or Madam:
We hereby issue, for the account of Edina Flats LLC and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in
the amount of $____________, available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank.
The draft must:
a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. __________, dated ________________, 20___, of
(Name of Bank) ";
b) State that Edina Flats LLC is in default, beyond any applicable notice and cure periods, under that
certain Site Improvement Performance Agreement between the City of Edina and Edina Flats LLC;
c) Be signed and sworn to by the City Manager or Finance Director of the City of Edina; and
d) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) , on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30,
20___.
This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless, at least forty-five (45)
days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written
notice to the Edina Finance Director that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written
notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45)
days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 W.
50th Street Edina, MN 55424-1330, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to
the renewal date.
This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended,
amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein.
This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be
made under this Letter of Credit.
This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and Practice
for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600.
We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored
upon presentation.
BY: ____________________________________
Its ______________________________
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.J.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:C had A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering
Item Activity:
Subject:R es olution No. 2018-52 S upporting Hennepin
C ounty's Vernon Avenue Bridge R egional S olic itation
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Approve R esolution No. 2018-52 S upporting the Regional Solicitation by H ennepin C ounty Supporting the
Vernon Avenue Bridge R eplacement P roject.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
T he Vernon Avenue B ridge west of H ighway 100 is at the end of its useful life and warrants replacement.
Hennepin County is seeking federal funding support to replace the bridge in 2022-2023 to improve safety for all
modes.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Resolution No. 2018-52
Letter of Support
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-52
SUPPORTING THE REGIONAL SOLICITATION BY HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORTING
THE VERNON AVENUE BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, Hennepin County, through the Metropolitan Council is submitting an application to
obtain federal funding for the Vernon Avenue Bridge Replacement over the CP Rail; and,
WHEREAS, the funding would be available for the years 2022-2023
WHEREAS, the existing bridge, built in 1927, has reached the end of its useful life and warrants
replacement; and,
WHEREAS, the existing bridge, currently has weight restrictions and is classified as structurally
deficient; and,
WHEREAS, a new bridge would address a critical asset near TH 100 and provide improved safety
for all modes; and,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina supports Hennepin County’s regional
solicitation through Hennepin County for federal funding to replace the Vernon Avenue Bridge over the CP Rail.
Adopted this 19th day of June, 2018.
ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________
City Clerk Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached
and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2018,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__.
__________________________________
City Clerk
June 19, 2018
Carla Stueve, P.E., P.T.O.E
Hennepin County Engineer
Transportation Project Delivery
1600 Prairie Drive
Medina, MN 55340
RE: Support for Regional Solicitation Application
Vernon Avenue (CSAH 158) Bridge #4510 Project over CP Rail
Dear Ms. Stueve:
The City of Edina hereby expresses its support for the Hennepin County Regional Solicitation federal funding
application for the proposed bridge project at CSAH 158 (Vernon Avenue) for Bridge #4510 over CP Rail.
The existing bridge, built in 1927, has reached the end of its useful life and warrants replacement. The bridge
is currently weight restricted and is classified as structurally deficient. The new bridge will address a critical
asset near TH 100 and will provide an opportunity to improve safety for all modes.
Thank you for making us aware of this application effort and the opportunity to provide support. The city
looks forward to working with you on this project.
Sincerely,
Chad A. Milner, P.E.
Director of Engineering
City of Edina
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.K.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:Mark Nolan, AI C P, Transportation P lanner
Item Activity:
Subject:Approve Traffic S afety R eport of May 1, 2018 Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
R eview and approve the T raffic S afety R eport of May 1, 2018.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
T he E dina Transportation Commission (E T C) reviewed the M ay 1, 2018, Traffic Safety Report at their May 17
meeting and moved to forward the report to the C ity C ouncil for approval. See attached draft minutes.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Staff Report: Traffic Safety of May 1, 2018
DRAFT Minutes: Edina Transportation Commission May 17, 2018
June 19, 2018
Mayor and City Council
Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator
Traffic Safety Preview of May 1, 2018
Information / Background:
The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 1. The Traffic Safety
Coordinator, Engineering Director, Police Lieutenant and Assistant City Planner were in attendance for this
meeting. The Traffic Safety Specialist, Public Works Director and Transportation Planner were not able to
attend and were informed of the decisions and did not object to the recommendations.
For these reviews, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have
been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were informed that if
they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, these comments can be included
on the May 17 Edina Transportation Commission and the June 19 City Council meeting agendas.
Section A: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends action
A1. Request to add temporary on-street parking on W 51st St
Construction taking place near 50th & France
is causing an increase in parking demand
ADT on W 51st is 6,100
85% speed is 27 mph
The width of 51st is 46’
After review, staff recommends allowing
temporary on-street parking along this area of
W 51st St. Staff is comfortable of the width of
W 51st St and believes allowing on-street
parking may lower vehicle speeds in the area
as well. Staff also agrees parking demand is
high in this area with the current
redevelopment taking place.
Map: Location to add temporary on‐street parking on
W 51st St
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action
B1. Request to change lane designations on Hazelton Rd at France Ave
A resident was concerned with vehicles
traveling west on Hazelton would turn left
(southbound) onto France from the center
(straight) lane
Westbound lane designations on Hazelton
are left turn, straight and right turn
Hazelton is classified as a state-aid collector
street
Hennepin County recommends making no
turning movement change for this
intersection
County’s recommendation includes requiring new developers in the area to change the
layout of this portion of Hazelton
The following data shows westbound turning movements
After review, staff recommends no action as Hennepin County recommended changing
the layout of Hazelton east of France Ave in lieu of a double-left turn lane. County staff
believes that changing the lane designation would not improve the overall level of
service to this intersection. Staff agrees and will be aware of this stretch of Hazelton
during future nearby developments.
Section C: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends further study
C1. Request to change on-street parking restriction
on Xerxes Ave between W 66th and W 67th St
A developer at Xerxes and W 66th St is
requesting to allow on-street parking
Parking has been restricted on the west side
of Xerxes as this was formerly commercially
zoned leading to high number of vehicles
parking on Xerxes
On-street parking is allowed on the east side
of Xerxes
Xerxes has a width of 32’
The east side of Xerxes restricts parking to
2-hour parking from 9 am to 6 pm
Direction Left
Turn
Thru Middle Lane,
Left Turn
Right
Turn
ADT 1965 230 18 2184
% 44.7 5.2 0.4 49.7
Map: Location of France and Hazelton
Photo: Hazelton facing west showing lane markings
Map: Location of Xerxes Ave requesting to remove on
street parking restriction
STAFF REPORT Page 3
After review, staff recommends contacting Richfield to find what their interest would
be to change the current on-street parking matter along Xerxes. Staff also wants
feedback from current residents living on Xerxes.
C2. Request for all-way stop at the intersection of Tracy Ave and Valley View Rd
Residents in this area have concerns with
overall safety entering onto Tracy from
Valley View or exiting from HWY 62
Tracy is classified as a collector street with
an ADT of nearly 8,300 with a peak hour of
921 at 4:15 pm
ADT of vehicles entering the intersection
from the east and west legs is roughly 3,450
with a peak hour of 312 at 7:15 am
85% speed on Tracy was 34 MPH in 2015
As a major approach, Tracy exceeds 300
vehicles/hour 13 times per day
As a minor approach, Valley View and HWY
62 exceeds 200 vehicles/hour 8 times per
day
10 crashes have taken place at this intersection since August 2016
After review, staff recommends further study. Although this intersection does meet
warrants for all-way stop controls, staff points out there will be many intersections
impacted by this change. Staff wants input from MnDOT as they have resources and
knowledge regarding to what may be the best outcome for this request.
Map: Location of Tracy Ave and Valley View Rd
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Section D: Other traffic safety items handled
D1. A resident contacted Traffic Safety requesting a crosswalk over France Ave at Morningside Rd. The
resident was concerned with the level of safety for pedestrians that cross over this busy area of France.
Hennepin County was contacted regarding this request. There is a marked crosswalk nearly 250 feet
south at W 44th St. Hennepin County recommended no crosswalk to be placed as no crosswalks can be
placed within 500 feet of another. The purpose to keep 500 feet between crosswalks is to prevent
overuse and maintain effectiveness.
D2. A resident contacted Traffic Safety concerned with traffic signal timing at the intersection of
Interlachen and Vernon. Southeast traffic on Interlachen are being impacted with the short signal timing,
causing a higher vehicle delay. A concern was submitted into Hennepin County as traffic signals at this
location are under County jurisdiction.
D3. A resident who lives on France Ave, north of W 49th St is requesting to restrict parking further
from their driveway as sightlines are causing difficulties exiting onto France. The resident was informed
current parking on France is temporary and was recommended to maintain caution when exiting and
entering France.
D4. A resident contacted traffic safety concerned with the placement of a STOP sign along the Nine
Mile Creek Regional Trail next to Gleason Rd. The resident was concerned with this sign thinking
drivers unfamiliar to this area may stop at this sign on Gleason when it is designed only for trail users.
Upon contacting Three Rivers Park District, they are substituting the current STOP sign with an
intersection warning sign for trail users.
D5. A resident was concerned with other residents on Parklawn Ave parking their vehicles on the Nine
Mile Creek Regional Bike trail, while attempting to have their vehicles parked on their driveway which
is connected to the bike trail. Upon visiting the bike path, the majority of the bike path is available for
bicyclists and it appears the owners of the vehicles are making adequate attempts to not block the bike
trail. The resident was informed no action will be taken and with any future vehicles blocking the
majority of the bike path, they must contact the EPD.
STAFF REPORT Page 5
Appendix A:
All-Way Stop Warrants
Multi-way stop control can be useful as a safety measure at intersections if certain traffic conditions exist.
Safety concerns associated with multi-way stops include pedestrians, bicyclists, and all road users expecting
other road users to stop. Multi-way stop control is used where the volume of traffic on the intersecting
roads is approximately equal.
The restrictions on the use of STOP signs described in Section 2B.4 also apply to multi-way stop
applications. The decision to install multi-way stop control should be based on an engineering study. The
following criteria should be considered in the engineering study for a multi-way STOP sign installation:
A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be
installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the installation of the traffic
control signal.
B. Five or more reported crashes in a 12-month period that are susceptible to correction by a
multi-way stop installation. Such crashes include right-turn and left turn collisions as well as right-angle
collisions.
C. Minimum volumes:
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches (total of
both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day; and
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection from
the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200 units per hour for the
same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per
vehicle during the highest hour; but
3. If the 85th-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 mph, the
minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of the values provided in Items 1 and 2.
D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where Criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80
percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Other criteria that may be considered in an engineering study include:
A. The need to control left-turn conflicts;
B. The need to control vehicle/pedestrian conflicts near locations that generate high pedestrian
volumes;
C. Locations where a road user, after stopping, cannot see conflicting traffic and is not able to
negotiate the intersection unless conflicting cross traffic is also required to stop; and
D. An intersection of two residential neighborhood collector (through) streets of similar design and
operating characteristics where multi-way stop control would improve traffic operational characteristics of
the intersection.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Transportation Commission
Community Conference Room
May 17, 2018
I. Call To Order
Chair Richman called the meeting to order
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call were commissioners Ahler, Johnson, Kane, Ma, McCarthy, Olson, Richman, Ruthruff,
Veluvali, Yeager
Absent: Commissioners Scherer
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion was made by commissioner Johnson and seconded by commissioner Ruthruff to
approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner McCarthy
approving the March 15, 2018 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried.
V. Community Comment
None.
VI. Reports/Recommendations
E. Traffic Safety Report of May 1, 2018
Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner Johnson to the
approve May 1st, 2018 Traffic Safety Report. All voted Aye, motion carried.
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.L.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:MJ Lamon, P rojec t C oordinator
Item Activity:
Subject:Energy & Environment C ommis s ion Appointment Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Appoint Bayardo Lanzas to the E nergy and E nvironment C ommission for a partial term ending 3/1/20.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
T he E nergy and E nvironment C ommission recently had an unscheduled vacancy. B ayardo L anzas was selected
as an alternate and is still interested in serving.
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.M.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
F rom:Brian E. O ls on, Direc tor of P ublic Works
Item Activity:
Subject:Acc ept P ublic Easement from 3948 Market S treet
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Accept easement from 3948 Market Street
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
To facilitate the construction of the N orth P arking R amp E xpansion and R etail Shell construction, I mprovement
P roject 18-001, the property owner directly to the west has granted an 8' x 8' easement for permanent location of
a power pole in the northeast corner of their site.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
3948 Market Street easement document
GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT
LB 49th 'A STREET, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, hereinafter referred
to as "Grantor", in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant
unto the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, as grantee, hereinafter referred
to as "City", its successors and assigns, a non-exclusive permanent easement for electric utility
purposes including lines, a pole, and appurtenances, hereinafter referred to as "public utilities",
over, across, on, under, and through land situated within the County of Hennepin, State of
Minnesota, as legally described on the attached Exhibit "A".
INCLUDING the rights of the City, its contractors, agents, servants and assigns, to enter
upon the permanent easement premises at all reasonable times to construct, reconstruct, inspect,
repair, and maintain said public utility systems over, across, on, under, and through the
permanent easement premises, together with the right to grade, level, fill, drain and excavate the
permanent easement premises, and the further right to remove trees, bushes, undergrowth, and
other obstructions interfering with the location, construction, and maintenance of said public
utility easement. Grantee shall perform, or require to be performed, all of work on the easement
197946v1
parcel as permitted by this agreement in a commercially reasonable manner. Grantee shall not
generate, store, transport, treat, dispose of, release or use any hazardous substances on Grantor's
parcel. Grantee shall keep Grantor's free and clear of mechanic's, materialmen's and other similar
liens filed by reason of work, labor, services or materials supplied or claimed to have been
supplied in connection with any such work, and shall pay and discharge when due any and all
lawful claims upon which such lien may or could be based.
Subject to the terms of this agreement, this agreement is binding upon and inures to the
benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal heirs, successors and assigns. This agreement
runs with the land as set forth in this agreement.
The partners, shareholders, directors, officers and employees of each party hereto, as the
case may be, are not liable for any obligation under this agreement. Neither party hereto is liable
to the other under, or in connection with, this agreement for any consequential damages, and both
parties hereto waive, to the full extent permitted by law, any claim for consequential damages.
This agreement, and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto, must be construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.
[The balance of this page is intentionally left blank.]
197946v1
JENNIFER L. KENT
Notary Public-Minnesota
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this document this
day of June, 2018.
GRANTOR:
LB 49th 1/2 STREET, LLC
By
Its t.hca
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2018, by \„; Cryvic i , the k (Yr j of
LB 49th 'A Street, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the entity.
fr
197946v1
GRANTEE: EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
By:
James B. Hovland, Its President
By:
Robert J. Stewart, Its Secretary
Attest:
Scott Neal, Its Executive Director
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
)ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2018, by James B. Hovland, Robert J. Stewart, and Scott Neal, respectively the
President, Secretary and Executive Director of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, a
body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the entity.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
CAMPBELL KNUTSON
Professional Association
Grand Oak Office Center I
860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Telephone: (651) 452-5000
RNK
197946v1
EXHIBIT "A"
TO
GRANT OF PERMANENT EASEMENT
Legal description of the subject property:
Lot 1, Block 1, Replat of Lot 6, Block 1, Lund Kruse Addition, and the West 35 feet of the East
172 feet of the South 125 feet of the North 272.5 feet of Lot 36, Auditors Subdivision Number
172; together with that portion of West 49th 1/2 Street now vacated described as follows:
The North 1.25 feet of the east 68.76 feet of that part of West 49th 1/2 Street abutting the
south boundary of the tract of land described as "Lot 1, Block 1, Replat of Lot 6, Block 1,
Lund Kruse Addition, and the West 35 feet of the East 172 feet of the South 125 feet of the
North 272.5 feet of Lot 36, Auditors Subdivision Number 172",
according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder,
Minnesota.
Legal description of easement area:
A permanent easement for public utility purposes (including utility lines, utility poles, and
appurtenances) over, across, on, under, and through the North 8.00 feet of the West 8.00 feet of
the East 145.00 feet of the South 150.00 feet of the North Half of Lot 36, AUDITOR'S
SUBDIVISION NO. 172, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
[Property address: 3948 Market Street, Edina, MN 55424; PIN 18.028.24.14.0108; abstract]
197946v1
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:Kyle S awyer, As s is tant F inance Director
Item Activity:
Subject:Acc ept C omprehens ive Annual F inanc ial R eport
(C AF R ) F or Year Ended December 31, 2017
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Adopt a motion accepting the 2017 C omprehensive Annual F inancial R eport (C AF R ).
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
M M K R audited the financial statements of the City and issued an unqualified opinion, meaning in their judgment
the City's financial records and statements are fairly presented, and in accordance with Generally Accepted
Accounting P rinciples (G AAP ). J ames E ichten, C PA, from M alloy, M ontague, K arnowski, R adosevich, & Co.,
P.A., (M M K R) the P rinciple in charge of the audit, will be present at the meeting to do a presentation on the
audit results.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
2017 CAFR
Management Report
Special Purpos e Audit Report
PowerPoint: City of Edina
2017 Audit Pres entation
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
City of Edina, Minnesota
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2017
Prepared by:
Department of Finance
Donald Uram – Finance Director
Kyle Sawyer – Assistant Finance Director
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
I. INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Letter of Transmittal 1
GFOA Certificate of Achievement 4
Organization 5
Organization Chart 6
II. FINANCIAL SECTION
Independent Auditors' Report 7
Management's Discussion and Analysis 11
Basic Financial Statements:
Government-wide Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Position 23
Statement of Activities 24
Fund Financial Statements:
Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 26
Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Statement
of Net Position 27
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Governmental Funds 28
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities 29
Statement of Net Position - Proprietary Funds 30
Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position -
Proprietary Funds 31
Statement of Cash Flows - Proprietary Funds 32
Statement of Fiduciary Net Position - Agency Funds 34
Notes to Financial Statements 35
Required Supplementary Information:
Budgetary Comparison Information:
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund 75
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Fund 78
Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan Schedule of Funding Progress 79
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans GERF/PEPFF Retirement Funds
GERF Schedule of City's and Non-Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
& Schedule of City Contributions 80
PEPFF Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
& Schedule of City Contributions 81
Notes to Required Supplementary Information 82
Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements and Schedules:
Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds 88
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds 89
Special Revenue Fund - Community Development Block Grant
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 90
Special Revenue Fund - Police Special Revenue
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 91
Special Revenue Fund - Braemar Memorial
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 92
Special Revenue Fund - Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 93
Special Revenue Fund - Arts and Culture
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 94
Special Revenue Fund - Conservation and Sustainability
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 95
Capital Projects Fund - Environmental Efficiency
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 96
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Governmental Fund - Debt Service
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 98
Governmental Fund - Construction
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund
Balances - Budget and Actual 99
Combining Statement of Net Position - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 102
Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in
Fund Net Position - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 103
Combining Statement of Cash Flows - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 104
Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities - Agency Funds 107
Supplementary Financial Information:
Tax Capacity, Tax Levies and Tax Capacity Rates 109
Combined Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness 110
Schedule of Balance Sheet Accounts - Tax Increment Financing Districts 112
Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -
Tax Increment Financing Districts 113
III. STATISTICAL SECTION (UNAUDITED)
Financial Trends:
Net Position by Component 116
Changes in Net Position 118
Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 120
Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds 122
Revenue Capacity:
Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property 124
Direct and Overlapping Tax Capacity Rates 125
Principal Property Tax Payers 126
Property Tax Levies and Collections 127
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
No.
Debt Capacity:
Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type 128
Ratios of General Bonded Debt Outstanding 129
Direct and Overlapping Governmental Activities Debt 130
Legal Debt Margin Information 131
Pledged Revenue Coverage 132
Demographic and Economic Information:
Demographic and Economic Statistics 133
Principal Employers 134
Operating Information:
Full-Time Equivalent City Government Employees by Function 135
Operating Indicators by Function 136
Capital Asset Statistics by Function 137
1
June 6, 2018
To the Honorable Mayor, City Council, and Citizens of the City of Edina (City):
Minnesota statutes require that every city publish within six months of the close of each fiscal year a
complete set of audited financial statements. This report is published to fulfill that requirement for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.
Management assumes full responsibility for the completeness and reliability of all of the information
presented in this report, based upon a comprehensive framework of internal control that it has
established for this purpose. Because the cost of internal control should not exceed anticipated
benefits, the objective is to provide reasonable rather than absolute assurance that the financial
statements are free from material misstatement.
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich, & Co. P.A., a firm of licensed certified public accountants,
has issued an unmodified (“clean”) opinion on the City’s financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2017. The independent auditor’s report is located at the front of the financial section of
this report.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) immediately follows the independent auditor’s report
and provides a narrative introduction, overview, and analysis of the basic financial statements. The
MD&A complements this letter of transmittal and should be read in conjunction with it.
Profile of the City
The City, incorporated in 1888, is a fully developed first-ring suburb of Minneapolis. The City currently
occupies a land area of 16 square miles and serves a population of 51,804. Currently, 98% of the City
is developed with 55.5% of the land attributed to residential uses, 13.1% to roadways and 11.8%
supporting the park and open spaces. The remainder of the land is used for commercial, industrial and
public/semi-public uses. The City is empowered to levy a property tax on both real and personal
property located within its boundaries.
The City has operated under the Council-Manager form of government since 1955. Policy-making and
legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor and four other
members, all elected on a non-partisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for
passing ordinances, adopting the budget, appointing committees, and hiring the City Manager. The City
Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Council, for overseeing the
day-to-day operations of the city government, and for appointing the heads of the various departments.
Council members serve four-year terms, with two Council members elected every two years. The Mayor
also serves a four-year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large.
The City provides a full range of services, including police and fire protection; the construction and
maintenance of highways, streets, and other infrastructure; water and sewer services and recreational
and cultural activities and events.
The Council is required to adopt a final budget by no later than the close of the fiscal year. The annual
budget serves as the foundation for the City’s financial planning and control. The budget is prepared
by fund, function (e.g. public safety), and department (e.g. police). Department heads may use
resources within a department as they see fit. The City Manager may authorize transfers of budgeted
amounts between departments.
2
Local economy
The City currently enjoys a favorable economic environment and local indicators point to continued
stability. The region, while noted for a strong retail sector, enjoyed considerable re-development in
recent years. The re-development consisted of varied manufacturing, medical and high-tech base that
adds to the relative stability of the unemployment rate. Major industries with headquarters or divisions
within the government’s boundaries or in close proximity include medical services, retail operations and
banking services. Edina is home to over 50,000 jobs that are expected to remain stable over the coming
years.
The City has become known for its quality residential housing stock and attractive neighborhoods. To
date, approximately 98% of the available housing stock is in place. Although the emphasis has changed
over the years from exclusively single family housing to a more balanced mix of housing types, the
City’s concern for overall quality in residential development remains a top priority.
The City enjoys a AAA bond rating and a Aaa bond rating from Standard and Poors and Moody’s,
respectively.
Long-term financial planning
The Metropolitan Council requires all cities in the seven-county metropolitan area to have a
Comprehensive Plan and State law requires cities to update their plans every 10 years. The
Comprehensive Plan guides development and redevelopment and addresses changes likely to occur
due to various social and market forces. The City updated our Comprehensive Plan and submitted it to
the Metropolitan Council for review in 2008. A final version was adopted by the City Council in 2009.
The City continues to focus on quality of life improvements throughout Edina. These efforts cover a
broad array of areas including protecting and improving the environment, revitalization of parks and
public areas, expanding recreational opportunities, expanding City services, and increasing
communication between City representatives and the public.
The City is working closely with state government, federal government and neighboring communities
to improve the area’s state and county transportation network, which includes upgraded highways and
well-placed pathways. Funding for most of the transportation improvements will need to come from
state, county and federal sources, with some minor portion supported by the local taxpayers.
Relevant financial policies
The City has adopted a set of financial management policies that focus on long-term financial planning.
Policies cover areas such as cash and investments, the operating budget, revenue, fund balance,
capital outlay, and debt management.
Assignments for fund balances and compensated absences are all calculated as specified in the
policies. In addition, the City has $15,656,518 unassigned fund balance in the general fund. This
amount is $2,264,772 above the goal range identified in the policy.
Major initiatives
The City is continually working to update our aging infrastructure. Our annually adopted five-year
Capital Improvement Plan includes spending and financing projections for these projects.
3
Awards and Acknowledgements
The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a
Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Edina for its
comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. This was the
eighth consecutive year that the government has achieved this prestigious award. In order to be
awarded a Certificate of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently
organized comprehensive annual financial report. This report must satisfy both generally accepted
accounting principles and applicable legal requirements.
A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year only. We believe that our current
comprehensive annual financial report continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program’s
requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.
The preparation of this report would not have been possible without the dedicated services of the
Finance Department staff. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the department
who assisted and contributed to the preparation of this report. Credit also must be given to the Mayor
and the City Council for their unfailing support for maintaining the highest standards of professionalism
in the management of the City’s finances.
Respectfully submitted,
Donald Uram
Finance Director
Kyle Sawyer
Assistant Finance Director
Government Finance Officers Association
Certificate of
Achievement
for Excellence
in Financial
Reporting
Presented to
City of Edina
Minnesota
For its Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report
for the Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016
P AgriAA:a
Executive Director/CEO
4
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
ORGANIZATION
December 31, 2017
Term Expires
Mayor:
James Hovland December 31, 2020
Council Members:
Mary Brindle December 31, 2020
Mike Fischer December 31, 2020
Kevin Staunton December 31, 2018
Bob Stewart December 31, 2018
City Manager:
Scott Neal Appointed
Finance Director/Treasurer:
Donald Uram Appointed
City Clerk:
Debra Mangen Appointed
5
CI
T
Y
O
F
E
D
I
N
A
,
M
I
N
N
E
S
O
T
A
6
C ERTIFIED
A CCOUNTANTS
P UBLIC
PRINCIPALS
Thomas A. Karnowski, CPA
Paul A. Radosevich, CPA
William J. Lauer, CPA
James H. Eichten, CPA
Aaron J. Nielsen, CPA
Victoria L. Holinka, CPA/CMA
Malloy, Montague, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co., P.A.
5353 Wayzata Boulevard • Suite 410 • Minneapolis, MN 55416 • Phone: 952-545-0424 • Fax: 952-545-0569 • www.mmkr.com
7
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
REPORT ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type
activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes to the financial
statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of
contents.
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes
the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair
presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error.
AUDITOR’S RESPONSIBILITY
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit . We conducted
our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and
the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the
Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error .
In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the City’s preparation
and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s
internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our audit opinions.
(continued)
8
OPINIONS
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to on the previous page present fairly, in all material
respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of December 31, 2017, and the
respective changes in financial position and, where applicable, cash flows thereof , for the year then
ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
OTHER MATTERS
Required Supplementary Information
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management’s
discussion and analysis and the required supplementary information (RSI), as listed in the table of
contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information, although not a part
of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, who
considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an
appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to
the RSI in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which
consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the
information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial stat ements,
and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an
opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us
with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance.
Other Information
Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively
comprise the City’s basic financial statements. The introductory section, combining and individual fund
financial statements and schedules, supplementary financial information, and statistical section, as listed
in the table of contents, are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not required part s of the
basic financial statements.
The combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of
management and were derived from and relate directly to the underlying accounting and other records
used to prepare the basic financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures,
including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other
records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and
other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules are
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole.
The introductory section, supplementary financial information, and statistical section have not been
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and,
accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on them.
(continued)
9
OTHER REPORTING REQUIRED BY GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated June 6, 2018 on
our consideration of the City’s internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance
with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose
of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and
compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s
internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit
performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control
over financial reporting and compliance.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 6, 2018
10
This page left blank intentionally.
11
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
As management of the City of Edina (the City), we offer readers of the City’s financial statements this
narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the City for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2017. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in conjunction with
additional information that we have furnished in our letter of transmittal, which precedes this report.
Financial Highlights
The assets and deferred outflows of resources of the City exceeded its liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources at the close of the most recent fiscal year by $251,522,963 (net position). Of
this amount, $48,856,247 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet the City’s ongoing
obligations to citizens and creditors in accordance with the City's fund designations and fiscal
policies.
The City’s total net position increased by $11,972,008 from current year operations. Of that total,
$5,403,222 is due to licenses and permits revenues from continued residential and commercial
redevelopment of the City. Also, $5,209,735 of the increase is due to Utility revenues over
expenses, which are being reinvested in new or rebuilt infrastructure according to the City’s Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) and Utility Rate Study.
As of the close of the current fiscal year, the City’s governmental funds reported combined ending
fund balances of $65,613,539, an increase of $11,431,662 over the prior year. The increase can
be attributed to the general obligation bond, series 2017C that was issued in 2017 in the amount
of $8,955,000 with the proceeds used to refund $9,480,000 of governmental fund bonds in
February 2018.
At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned fund balance for the general fund was $15,656,518
or 41% of total general fund expenditures.
The City’s total bonded debt increased by $11,788,625 during the current fiscal year, from
$116,893,220 to $128,681,845. The City issued new debt during the year consisting of $8,590,000
general obligation bonds to finance various street and utility infrastructure improvement projects,
$7,425,000 general obligation bonds to finance improvements to the golf course and aquatic center,
and $10,595,000 general obligation bonds to refund old debt, paid in February 2018.
Overview of the Financial Statements
This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the City’s basic financial
statements. The City’s basic financial statements comprise three components: 1) government-wide
financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements. This report
also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves.
Government-wide financial statements. The government-wide financial statements are designed to
provide readers with a broad overview of the City’s finances, in a manner similar to a private-sector
business.
The statement of net position presents information on all of the City’s assets, deferred outflows of
resources, liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between them reported as
net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of
whether the financial position of the City is improving or deteriorating.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
12
The statement of activities presents information showing how the City’s net position changed during
the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event
giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and
expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal
periods (e.g. uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave).
Both of the government-wide financial statements distinguish functions of the City that are principally
supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that
are intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges
(business-type activities). The governmental activities of the City include general government, public
safety, public works and parks. The business-type activities of the City include utilities, liquor, aquatic
center, golf course, arena, and community activity centers.
Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control
over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state
and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-
related legal requirements. All of the funds of the City can be divided into three categories:
governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds.
Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same
functions reported as governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
However, unlike the government-wide financial statements, governmental fund financial
statements focus on near-term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on
balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may
be useful in evaluating a government’s near-term financial requirements.
Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government-wide
financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds
with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government-wide financial
statement. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the City's near
term financial decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and governmental fund
statement of revenues, expenditures, and change in fund balances provide a reconciliation to
facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities.
The City maintains four individual major governmental funds. Information is presented
separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of
revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances for the general fund, Housing and
Redevelopment Authority fund, debt service fund and the construction fund.
Data from the other governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
Individual fund data for each of these non-major governmental funds are provided in the form
of combining statements elsewhere in this report.
The City adopts an annual appropriated budget for all governmental and proprietary funds. A
budgetary comparison statement has been provided for all governmental funds to demonstrate
compliance with these budgets.
Proprietary funds. The City maintains five major enterprise funds and one internal service
fund. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business-type
activities in the governmental-wide financial statements. The City’s major enterprise funds are
used to account for its utility, liquor, aquatic center, golf course and arena operations.
Data from the other proprietary funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation.
Individual fund data for each of these non-major proprietary funds are provided in the form of
combining statements elsewhere in this report.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
13
Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the government-wide financial
statements, only in more detail.
Internal service funds. Internal service funds are used as an accounting device to accumulate
and allocate costs internally among the City’s various functions. The City uses its internal
service fund to account for risk management activities, including worker’s compensation,
volunteer accident, and property/casualty insurance. Because the internal service activities
predominantly benefit government rather than business-type functions, these services have
been included within governmental activities in the government-wide financial statements.
Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of
parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government-wide
financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the
City’s own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for
proprietary funds.
Notes to the financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full
understanding of the data provided in the government–wide and fund financial statements.
Other information. The combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non-major
governmental and enterprise funds are presented immediately following the required supplementary
information.
Government-wide Financial Analysis
As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial
position. In the case of the City, assets and deferred outflows of resources exceeded liabilities and
deferred inflows of resources by $251,522,963 at the close of the most recent fiscal year.
The largest portion of the City's net position ($178,487,571 or 71%) reflects its investment in capital
assets (e.g. land, buildings, machinery, and equipment) less any related debt used to acquire those
assets that is still outstanding. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens;
consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the City's investment in its
capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this
debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to
liquidate these liabilities.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
14
City of Edina’s Net Position
2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Assets:
Current and
other assets 95,973,528$ 81,778,994$ 38,768,461$ 26,967,470$ 134,741,989$ 108,746,464$
Capital assets 164,516,480 164,999,307 131,969,914 128,110,759 296,486,394 293,110,066
Total assets 260,490,008$ 246,778,301$ 170,738,375$ 155,078,229$ 431,228,383$ 401,856,530$
Deferred outflows of resources:
Pension plan deferments 18,890,117$ 29,550,556$ 1,381,652$ 2,612,692$ 20,271,769$ 32,163,248$
Liabilities:
Long-term liabilities
outstanding 90,975,197$ 118,112,504$ 54,320,014$ 45,828,525$ 145,295,211$ 163,941,029$
Other liabilities 22,182,641 16,358,130 10,726,721 7,862,253 32,909,362 24,220,383
Total liabilities 113,157,838$ 134,470,634$ 65,046,735$ 53,690,778$ 178,204,573$ 188,161,412$
Deferred inflows of resources:
Pension plan deferments 20,819,966$ 5,571,402$ 952,650$ 736,009$ 21,772,616$ 6,307,411$
Net position:
Net investment in
capital assets 96,149,011$ 93,247,973$ 82,338,560$ 85,158,869$ 178,487,571$ 178,406,842$
Restricted 22,840,869 20,892,680 1,338,276 804,393 24,179,145 21,697,073
Unrestricted 26,412,441 22,146,168 22,443,806 17,300,872 48,856,247 39,447,040
Total net position 145,402,321$ 136,286,821$ 106,120,642$ 103,264,134$ 251,522,963$ 239,550,955$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
An additional portion of the City’s net position ($24,179,145) represents resources that are subject to
external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position
($48,856,247) may be used to meet the City's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City is able to report positive balances in all of the categories
of net position reported, both for the government as a whole, as well as for its separate governmental
and business-type activities. The same situation held true for the prior fiscal year.
There was an increase of $9,409,207 in unrestricted net position, largely due to positive operating
results in the Utility and General Funds and a large new assessment for the Golf Terrace B
neighborhood reconstruction project.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
15
As shown below, the City’s net position increased by $11,972,008 during the current fiscal year.
Factors contributing to this change are discussed in the next two sections.
City of Edina's Changes in Net Position
2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues:
Program revenues:
Charges for services 12,057,694$ 11,738,825$ 42,427,825$ 41,714,434$ 54,485,519$ 53,453,259$
Operating grants and
contributions 2,194,336 2,751,495 179,086 445,464 2,373,422 3,196,959
Capital grants and
contributions 9,775,184 15,252,861 904,201 - 10,679,385 15,252,861
General revenues:
Property taxes 33,665,029 31,396,421 - - 33,665,029 31,396,421
Other taxes 5,852,788 5,148,144 - - 5,852,788 5,148,144
Gain on disposal
of assets - 65,044 6,554 35,946 6,554 100,990
Unrestricted investment
earnings 514,073 344,277 254,990 136,208 769,063 480,485
Total revenues 64,059,104 66,697,067 43,772,656 42,332,052 107,831,760 109,029,119
Expenses:
General government 9,164,272 9,587,567 - - 9,164,272 9,587,567
Public safety 21,815,101 20,243,209 - - 21,815,101 20,243,209
Public works 17,750,505 19,444,472 - - 17,750,505 19,444,472
Parks 4,222,431 3,822,716 - - 4,222,431 3,822,716
Interest on long-term debt 1,996,354 2,133,474 - - 1,996,354 2,133,474
Utilities - - 17,361,659 16,780,474 17,361,659 16,780,474
Liquor - - 12,007,885 12,130,254 12,007,885 12,130,254
Aquatic center - - 1,015,328 915,560 1,015,328 915,560
Golf course - - 3,469,121 3,041,169 3,469,121 3,041,169
Arena - - 2,961,787 2,842,660 2,961,787 2,842,660
Community activity
centers - - 4,095,309 3,853,091 4,095,309 3,853,091
Total expenses 54,948,663 55,231,438 40,911,089 39,563,208 95,859,752 94,794,646
Increase in net position
before transfers 9,110,441 11,465,629 2,861,567 2,768,844 11,972,008 14,234,473
Transfers 5,059 99,573 (5,059) (99,573) - -
Change in net position 9,115,500 11,565,202 2,856,508 2,669,271 11,972,008 14,234,473
Net position - January 1 136,286,821 124,721,619 103,264,134 100,594,863 239,550,955 225,316,482
Net position - December 31 145,402,321$ 136,286,821$ 106,120,642$ 103,264,134$ 251,522,963$ 239,550,955$
Governmental Activities Business-type Activities Totals
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
16
Governmental Activities
Governmental activities increased the City's net position by $9,115,500, accounting for 76% of the total
growth in net position. Key elements of the increase are as follows.
Charges for services increased by $318,869, or 3% in 2017. This is primarily a result of
increased building and permit revenue due to continuing residential and commercial
redevelopment growth throughout the City.
Property taxes increased by $2,268,608 as the result of an increased general operating levy
that provides funding to continue existing service levels.
Investment earnings increased by $169,796, or 49% in 2017 due to increased interest rates.
Other taxes increased by $704,644 due to an increase in tax increment collections from the
Southdale 2 tax increment financing district.
Below are specific graphs which provide comparisons of the governmental activities revenues and
expenses:
Charges for services
19%
Operating grants and
contributions
3%
Capital grants and
contributions
15%
Property taxes
53%
Other taxes
9%
Other
1%
Revenues by Source - Governmental Activities
-
5
10
15
20
25
General
government
Public safety Public works Parks Interest on
long-term
debt
Millions
Expenses and Program Revenues - Governmental
Activities
expenses
program revenue
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
17
Business-type Activities
Business-type activities increased net position by $2,856,508, accounting for 24% of the City's growth
in net position. Key elements of the current year increase are as follows:
The utility fund had income before transfers of $5,209,735 for 2017. This additional equity is
used to invest in new and rebuilt utility infrastructure according to the City’s CIP and utility rate
study.
The liquor fund had income before transfers of $1,007,132 for 2017. The majority of the
additional equity is used to subsidize operations at other enterprise facilities.
The golf course fund had a loss before capital contributions and transfers of $2,189,040 for
2017. This is due to construction of the new championship 18-hole course that resulted in the
closure of the old 27-hole course it will be replacing.
Charges for
services
97%
Capital grants
and
contributions
2%
Unrestricted
investment
earnings
1%
Revenues by Source - Business-type Activities
-
5
10
15
20
25
Utilities Liquor Aquatic
center
Golf course Arena Community
activity
centers
Millions
Expenses and Program Revenues - Business-type
Activities
expenses
program revenue
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
18
Financial Analysis of the City's Funds
As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance-
related legal requirements.
Governmental Funds. The focus of the City’s governmental funds is to provide information on near-
term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing
the City’s financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful
measure of a government’s net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year.
At the end of the current fiscal year, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund
balances of $65,613,539, an increase of $11,431,662 in comparison with the prior year. Approximately
24% of this total amount ($15,656,518) constitutes unassigned fund balance. The remainder of the fund
balance is 1) nonspendable due to prepaid items ($13,124), 2) restricted by external creditors, grantors,
laws or regulations ($32,494,197), or 3) assigned by internal constraints ($17,449,700).
The general fund is the chief operating fund of the City. At the end of the current fiscal year, unassigned
fund balance of the general fund was $15,656,518. As a measure of the general fund’s liquidity,
unassigned fund balance represents 41% of total general fund expenditures.
The fund balance of the City’s general fund increased by $1,177,543 during the current fiscal year. Key
factors in this increase are as follows:
Total general fund revenues were $2,307,029 over budget, including higher than expected
building permit activity. General fund license and permit revenues increased by 2.5% in the
current fiscal year after a 7.6% and 7.5% increase in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Total general fund expenditures were $750,919 under budget. Much of this savings occurred
in the public works and engineering departments as a result of less being spent on contractual
services and personal services than anticipated. The City’s central service divisions also came
in under budget in 2017 resulting in fewer expenses being charged back to the general fund.
The liquor fund transferred $50,000 of profits to the general fund, as planned in the 2017
budget.
Transfers out of the general fund totaled $1,880,405 related to the 2016 unassigned fund
balance and parkland dedication fees transferred to fund various construction projects.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund balance increased by $1,647,449 in the current fiscal
year due to higher than anticipated tax increment collections in the Southdale 2 district. In addition,
there was less capital outlay spending than anticipated. Discussions were held regarding various
redevelopment projects, and increased capital outlay spending is anticipated for future years.
The debt service fund has a total fund balance of $17,000,806, all of which is restricted for the payment
of debt service. The net increase in fund balance during the current year in the debt service fund was
$5,813,338. Fund balance increased as the result of the general obligation refunding bond, series
2017C that was issued in 2017 in the amount of $8,955,000 and refunded $9,480,000 of debt service
fund bonds in February 2018.
The construction fund balance increased by $2,601,183 in 2017 due to a $1,880,405 transfer in of the
2016 general fund surplus. In addition, new debt was issued in 2017 to help finance various street
improvement projects and special assessment revenues increased as a result of collection for various
neighborhood reconstructions that were expenditures in previous years.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
19
Proprietary funds. The City’s proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the
government-wide financial statements, but in more detail.
Unrestricted net position of the utility fund at the end of the year amounted to $19,555,562. The total
growth in net position from current year operations was $5,109,735. Operating revenues in the utilities
fund increased by 9.7% while expenses increased by 3.1% in 2017. The revenue increase was due to
an increase in the water, sewer and storm rates along with increased water and sewer connection fees
collected as the result of increased development. Expenses increased as a result of higher depreciation
expenses related to infrastructure projects completed in recent years, along with increased fees set by
the Metropolitan Council for sewer service. The City invested $6,618,816 in utility fund capital assets
during 2017.
Unrestricted net position of the liquor fund at the end of the year amounted to $929,183. Total net
position increased by $257,132 from current year operations. The liquor fund continues to transfer
profits back into other City funds, including the general, construction, golf course, arena, centennial
lakes and art center funds. The liquor fund made transfers totaling $750,000 to other funds during 2017.
Unrestricted net position of the aquatic center fund at the end of the year amounted to $275,190.
Aquatic center revenues increased by 0.7% from 2016 due to minimal fee increases. Expenses
increased by 9.9% from 2016 due to the capitalization of the new zero depth play structure resulting in
increased depreciation.
Unrestricted net position of the golf course fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of
($261,273) an improvement of $594,761 from the prior year. The 27-hole regulation course closed in
October 2016 and was closed for all of 2017 for renovations, resulting in $1,555,290 in less revenue
compared to 2016. The decrease in revenue was offset by a decrease in expenses of $559,085 along
with the issuance of $6,585,000 general obligation bonds issued to fund the aforementioned
renovations.
Unrestricted net position of the arena fund at the end of the year amounted to a deficit of ($271,490),
an improvement of $137,980 from the prior year. Revenues increased by $192,260 due to increased
revenues related to ice time rental while expenses increased by $123,375 due to unforeseen repairs
and maintenance expenses.
General Fund Budgetary Highlights
During the year, there was an $1,880,405 increase in appropriations between the original and final
amended budget. The increase is the result of transfers to the construction fund of unassigned general
fund balance according to the City’s fund balance policy.
During the year, revenues were $2,307,029 more than budget, as the continued commercial and
residential redevelopment of the City increased our licenses and permits, which exceeded budget by
$1,132,050. In addition, charges for services exceeded budget by $711,446 due to increased
recreational program revenue from parks and recreation and increased ambulance revenue from the
fire department.
During the year, expenditures were $750,919 under budget; much of this savings occurred in the
public works and engineering departments as a result of less being spent on contractual services and
personal services than anticipated. The City’s central service divisions also came in under budget in
2017 resulting in fewer expenses being charged back to the general fund.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
20
Capital Asset and Debt Administration
Capital assets. The City’s investment in capital assets for its governmental and business type activities
as of December 31, 2017, amounted to $296,486,394 (net of accumulated depreciation). This
investment in capital assets included land, land improvements, intangible assets such as easements,
infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), buildings, vehicles, equipment,
parks, and construction in progress. The total increase in the City’s investment in capital assets for the
current fiscal year was 1.2% (a 0.3% decrease for governmental activities and a 3.0% increase for
business-type activities).
Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following:
The City replaced the old zero depth play structure and pool filters at the aquatic center; the
project was capitalized at a cost of $851,644.
The City continued construction on the new 18-hole championship golf course; construction in
progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $5,495,376.
A variety of street construction, sidewalk and park projects; construction in progress as of the
close of the fiscal year reached $6,874,775.
A variety of utility infrastructure improvements, including watermain, sanitary and storm sewer,
construction in progress as of the close of the fiscal year reached $6,261,065 in the utility fund.
The City completed the Golf Terrace B and Strachauer Park A neighborhoods utility and street
reconstruction projects; total construction cost was $7,978,908.
City of Edina’s Capital Assets
(Net of Depreciation)
2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
Land and land
improvements 29,193,198$ 29,081,323$ 5,092,477$ 5,544,269$ 34,285,675$ 34,625,592$
Easements 253,000 253,000 35,600 - 288,600 253,000
Buildings and structures 40,198,991 41,999,729 21,940,265 23,207,049 62,139,256 65,206,778
Machinery and equipment 6,018,012 6,210,384 6,507,805 6,738,236 12,525,817 12,948,620
Infrastructure 71,232,508 63,484,786 86,637,326 83,361,780 157,869,834 146,846,566
Parks 10,745,996 11,793,813 - - 10,745,996 11,793,813
Construction in progress 6,874,775 12,176,272 11,756,441 9,259,425 18,631,216 21,435,697
Total 164,516,480$ 164,999,307$ 131,969,914$ 128,110,759$ 296,486,394$ 293,110,066$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
Additional information on the City’s capital assets can be found in Note 3.
Long-term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, the City had total bonded long-term debt
outstanding of $128,681,845, an increase of $11,788,625 from 2016. This increase resulted from
$26,610,000 in new debt, offset by payment of previously scheduled principal payments.
$30,630,000 is for general obligation improvement debt that is supported by property tax levies and
special assessments. This amount increased from 2016 due to a new debt issue that will refund the
2009A bond in February 2018.
$25,810,000 is for permanent improvement revolving (PIR) bonds, which finance the City’s special
assessment program. This amount decreased from 2016 due to regularly scheduled principal payments
offset by newly issued debt of $1,995,000.
Also outstanding is $19,485,000 HRA public project revenue bonds which financed two gymnasiums,
the new public works facility, sports dome, outdoor rink at the arena, and improvements to Pamela
Park. This amount decreased in 2017 due to regularly scheduled principal payments.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
21
There is a total of $52,740,000 in revenue bonds for improvements to the enterprise funds. This amount
increased $10,120,000 during the year due to $15,660,000 in issued debt offset by $5,540,000 in
regularly scheduled principal payments. The issued debt is being used to finance various utility
infrastructure improvement projects, improvements to the golf course and aquatic center. In addition,
$1,640,00 of the issued debt will refund the 2009C bond in February 2018.
City of Edina’s Outstanding Debt
2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
General obligation bonds 30,630,000$ 27,935,000$ -$ -$ 30,630,000$ 27,935,000$
Public improvement bonds 25,810,000 25,920,000 - - 25,810,000 25,920,000
Public project revenue bonds 19,485,000 20,390,000 - - 19,485,000 20,390,000
Edina emerald energy program bonds 16,845 28,220 - - 16,845 28,220
Revenue bonds - - 52,740,000 42,620,000 52,740,000 42,620,000
Total 75,941,845$ 74,273,220$ 52,740,000$ 42,620,000$ 128,681,845$ 116,893,220$
Governmental Activities Business-Type Activities Totals
The City maintains an Aaa rating from Moody's and an AAA rating from Standard & Poor’s.
State statutes limit the amount of general obligation debt a Minnesota city may issue up to 3% of total
Estimated Market Value. The current debt limitation for the City is $323,555,954. Only $50,115,000 of
the City's outstanding debt is counted within the statutory limitation.
Additional information on the City’s long-term debt can be found in Note 4.
Economic Factors and Next Year’s Budget
The City strives to provide an uncommonly high quality of life for our residents and businesses and the
relatively healthy local economy helps to make this goal a reality. The unemployment rate in Edina for
December 2017 was 2.83%, well below the state and national levels. The City is home to Southdale
Center, the nation’s first fully enclosed climate-controlled regional shopping mall, Fairview Southdale
hospital, as well as several corporate headquarters. In addition to its healthy economy, Edina is known
for excellent public schools, as the Edina school system has been consistently selected as one of the
best in the country. Ninety-eight percent of students graduate, with eighty-eight percent pursuing some
sort of post-secondary education.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Continued)
22
Property values in Edina increased for several years through 2008, but values declined from 2009-
2012 and are back on the rise in 2013-2017. Estimated market value of real estate increased 6.9% for
taxes payable in 2018.
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Market Value and Tax Capacity
Annual Changes Tax Capacity
Market Value
The City collects property taxes based on tax capacity, which roughly equals estimated market value
multiplied by class rates for different types of parcels (commercial, residential, etc.). Class rates are set
by state statute. Tax capacity for real estate increased 7.4% for taxes payable in 2018, and remained
positive for the fifth consecutive year.
All of these factors above were considered in preparing the City’s budget for the 2018 fiscal year. The
City’s adopted 2018 budget includes a property tax levy of $35,784,777 for all funds, an increase of
5.8% from the 2017 levy, with the increase being attributed to increased levies for the City’s capital
improvement plan, HRA operating expenses, and general operating levy.
Requests for Information
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City’s finances for all those with
an interest in the government’s finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this
report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to the Office of the Finance
Director, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. The City’s Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report can also be found on the internet at www.edinamn.gov.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
December 31, 2017
Governmental Business-type
Activities Activities Total
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and investments 58,239,807$ 25,048,419$ 83,288,226$
Restricted cash and investments 9,653,329 7,235,450 16,888,779
Accrued interest 147,217 68,534 215,751
Accounts receivable, net 1,028,455 4,350,240 5,378,695
Special assessments receivable 23,228,238 293,592 23,521,830
Due from other governments 1,604,410 7,672 1,612,082
Prepaid items 301,719 478,240 779,959
Inventory - 1,286,314 1,286,314
Total current assets 94,203,175 38,768,461 132,971,636
Noncurrent assets:
Investment in joint powers agreement 1,770,353 - 1,770,353
Nondepreciable capital assets 29,194,058 12,077,382 41,271,440
Depreciable capital assets (net) 135,322,422 119,892,532 255,214,954
Total noncurrent assets 166,286,833 131,969,914 298,256,747
Deferred outflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 18,890,117 1,381,652 20,271,769
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 279,380,125 172,120,027 451,500,152
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 1,936,916 756,928 2,693,844
Salaries payable 688,695 166,630 855,325
Accrued interest payable 884,570 705,359 1,589,929
Contracts payable 408,239 1,259,104 1,667,343
Due to other governments 14,849 184,541 199,390
Deposits payable 1,526,551 - 1,526,551
Unearned revenue 52,731 119,540 172,271
Compensated absences payable 1,670,090 357,619 2,027,709
Bonds payable 15,000,000 7,177,000 22,177,000
Total current liabilities 22,182,641 10,726,721 32,909,362
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 2,112,415 220,968 2,333,383
Net pension liability 23,336,849 5,131,918 28,468,767
Compensated absences payable 2,505,136 536,428 3,041,564
Bonds payable, net 63,020,797 48,430,700 111,451,497
Total noncurrent liabilities 90,975,197 54,320,014 145,295,211
Deferred inflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 20,819,966 952,650 21,772,616
Total liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources 133,977,804 65,999,385 199,977,189
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 96,149,011 82,338,560 178,487,571
Restricted for tax increments 11,420,325 - 11,420,325
Restricted for affordable housing 2,026,871 - 2,026,871
Restricted for debt service 7,347,478 1,338,276 8,685,754
Restricted for pedestrian and cyclist improvements 23,765 - 23,765
Restricted for energy efficiency projects 78,702 - 78,702
Restricted for parkland dedication 961,133 - 961,133
Restricted for police special revenue 583,959 - 583,959
Restricted for braemar golf donations 130,933 - 130,933
Restricted for arts and culture donations 20,781 - 20,781
Restricted for conservation and sustainability initiatives 246,922 - 246,922
Unrestricted 26,412,441 22,443,806 48,856,247
Total net position 145,402,321$ 106,120,642$ 251,522,963$
Primary Government
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
23
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Operating Capital
Charges for Grants and Grants and
Expenses Services Contributions Contributions
Functions/Programs
Primary government:
Governmental activities:
General government 9,164,272$ 1,142,120$ 695,896$ -$
Public safety 21,815,101 9,627,122 1,274,911 -
Public works 17,750,505 439,035 199,848 9,731,774
Parks 4,222,431 849,417 23,681 43,410
Interest on long-term debt 1,996,354 - - -
Total government activities 54,948,663 12,057,694 2,194,336 9,775,184
Business-type activities:
Utilities 17,361,659 21,361,972 139,542 904,201
Liquor 12,007,885 12,991,764 9,111 -
Aquatic center 1,015,328 962,857 - -
Golf course 3,469,121 1,254,412 - -
Arena 2,961,787 2,508,192 50 -
Community activity centers 4,095,309 3,348,628 30,383 -
Total business-type activities 40,911,089 42,427,825 179,086 904,201
Total primary government 95,859,752$ 54,485,519$ 2,373,422$ 10,679,385$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Program Revenues
24
Governmental Business-type
Activities Activities Total
(7,326,256)$ -$ (7,326,256)$
(10,913,068) - (10,913,068)
(7,379,848) - (7,379,848)
(3,305,923) - (3,305,923)
(1,996,354) - (1,996,354)
(30,921,449) - (30,921,449)
- 5,044,056 5,044,056
- 992,990 992,990
- (52,471) (52,471)
- (2,214,709) (2,214,709)
- (453,545) (453,545)
- (716,298) (716,298)
- 2,600,023 2,600,023
(30,921,449) 2,600,023 (28,321,426)
General revenues:
Property taxes 33,665,029 - 33,665,029
Tax increment collections 3,422,898 - 3,422,898
Franchise taxes 2,408,884 - 2,408,884
Lodging taxes 21,006 - 21,006
Unrestricted investment earnings 514,073 254,990 769,063
Gain on disposal of capital assets - 6,554 6,554
Transfers - capital assets (68,083) 68,083 -
Transfers - internal activities 73,142 (73,142) -
Total general revenues and transfers 40,036,949 256,485 40,293,434
Change in net position 9,115,500 2,856,508 11,972,008
Net position - beginning 136,286,821 103,264,134 239,550,955
Net position - ending 145,402,321$ 106,120,642$ 251,522,963$
Net (Expense) Revenue and
Changes in Net Position
25
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
BALANCE SHEET
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2017
Housing & Nonmajor Total
Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental
General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds
Assets
Cash and Investments 20,557,003$ 13,513,449$ 7,299,243$ 15,314,753$ 1,075,396$ 57,759,844$
Restricted cash and
investments - - 9,651,935 1,394 - 9,653,329
Accrued interest 51,303 42,933 - 50,651 1,847 146,734
Accounts receivable 605,816 (759) - 53,537 353,333 1,011,927
Special assessments
receivable - - 2,476,028 20,752,210 - 23,228,238
Due from other funds - - - 68,351 - 68,351
Due from other governments 732,153 39,480 78,327 745,012 9,438 1,604,410
Prepaid items 13,124 - - - - 13,124
Total assets 21,959,399$ 13,595,103$ 19,505,533$ 36,985,908$ 1,440,014$ 93,485,957$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 1,168,852$ 145,471$ 1,585$ 291,401$ 93,640$ 1,700,949$
Salaries payable 679,444 3,195 - 1,640 4,416 688,695
Contracts payable - - - 219,794 188,445 408,239
Due to other funds - - - - 68,351 68,351
Due to other governments 14,849 - - - - 14,849
Deposits payable 1,526,551 - - - - 1,526,551
Unearned revenue 53,490 (759) - - - 52,731
Total liabilities 3,443,186 147,907 1,585 512,835 354,852 4,460,365
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue - taxes 146,359 - 27,114 10,242 100 183,815
Unavailable revenue -
special assessments - - 2,476,028 20,752,210 - 23,228,238
Total deferred inflows of
resources 146,359 - 2,503,142 20,762,452 100 23,412,053
Fund balance:
Nonspendable 13,124 - - - - 13,124
Restricted 961,133 13,447,196 17,000,806 - 1,085,062 32,494,197
Assigned 1,739,079 - - 15,710,621 - 17,449,700
Unassigned 15,656,518 - - - - 15,656,518
Total fund balance 18,369,854 13,447,196 17,000,806 15,710,621 1,085,062 65,613,539
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources,
and fund balances 21,959,399$ 13,595,103$ 19,505,533$ 36,985,908$ 1,440,014$ 93,485,957$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
26
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE BALANCE SHEET OF GOVERNMENTAL
FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
December 31, 2017
Total fund balances - governmental funds 65,613,539$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Position are different because:
Cost of capital assets 292,786,073
Accumulated depreciation (128,269,593)
Bonds payable (75,941,845)
Premium on bonds (2,492,924)
Discount on bonds 413,972
Compensated absences payable (4,175,226)
Net OPEB obligation (2,112,415)
Net pension liability (23,336,849)
(884,570)
1,770,353
Deferred outflows - pension plans 18,890,117
Deferred inflows - pension plans (20,819,966)
Deferred inflows - property taxes 183,815
Deferred inflows - special assessments 23,228,238
549,602
Total net position - governmental activities 145,402,321$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
The recognition of certain revenues and expenditures differ between the full accrual governmental
activities financial statements and the modified accrual governmental fund financial statements.
Capital assets are included in net position, but are excluded from fund balances because they do not
represent financial resources.
Long-term liabilities are included in net positon, but are excluded from fund balances until due and
payable. Debt issuance premiums and discounts are excluded from net position until amortized, but are
included in fund balances upon issuance as other financing sources and uses
Accrued interest payable on long-term debt is included in net position, but is excluded from fund
balances until due and payable.
Investment in joint powers agreement are not available to pay for current-period expenditures, and
therefore, are not reported in the funds.
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual
funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service fund are included in the governmental activities
in the Statement of Net Position.
27
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Housing & Nonmajor Total
Redevelopment Debt Governmental Governmental
General Authority Service Construction Funds Funds
Revenues:
General property taxes 26,783,198$ 95,414$ 4,560,803$ 2,237,135$ 20,000$ 33,696,550$
Tax increment collections - 3,422,898 - - - 3,422,898
Franchise taxes 889,872 - - 100,277 1,418,735 2,408,884
Lodging tax 21,006 - - - - 21,006
Special assessments - - 207,504 5,123,262 - 5,330,766
License and permits 5,324,710 - - 78,512 - 5,403,222
Intergovernmental 1,383,606 3,046 - 2,041,288 259,322 3,687,262
Charges for services 4,729,419 42,400 - 145,354 - 4,917,173
Fines and forfeitures 1,064,271 - - - 71,715 1,135,986
Investment income 171,094 143,481 19,925 174,069 3,879 512,448
Rental of property 459,099 - - - - 459,099
Parkland dedication 33,460 - - - - 33,460
Other revenues 97,596 - - 537,055 126,630 761,281
Total revenues 40,957,331 3,707,239 4,788,232 10,436,952 1,900,281 61,790,035
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 6,338,153 474,923 - - 252,653 7,065,729
Public safety 19,053,058 - - 30,719 149,609 19,233,386
Public works 10,877,264 - - 416,313 231,319 11,524,896
Parks 1,680,908 - - 2,910 11,579 1,695,397
Capital outlay:
General government - 1,584,867 - 1,051,159 - 2,636,026
Public safety - - - 650,679 7,094 657,773
Public works - - - 6,436,448 919,095 7,355,543
Parks - - - 330,987 72,883 403,870
Debt service:
Bond principal - - 5,496,375 - - 5,496,375
Interest and fiscal charges - - 2,359,551 - - 2,359,551
Total expenditures 37,949,383 2,059,790 7,855,926 8,919,215 1,644,232 58,428,546
Revenues over
(under) expenditures 3,007,948 1,647,449 (3,067,694) 1,517,737 256,049 3,361,489
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 50,000 - 3,000,000 2,080,405 - 5,130,405
Transfers out (1,880,405) - - (3,112,958) (63,900) (5,057,263)
Sale of capital assets - - - 84,388 - 84,388
Bonds issued - - 107,886 1,887,114 - 1,995,000
Refunding bonds issued - - 8,955,000 - - 8,955,000
Refunded bonds paid from escrow - - (3,785,000) - - (3,785,000)
Premium on bonds issued - - 642,105 156,686 - 798,791
Discount on bonds issued - - (38,959) (12,189) - (51,148)
Total other financing
sources (uses) (1,830,405) - 8,881,032 1,083,446 (63,900) 8,070,173
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance 1,177,543 1,647,449 5,813,338 2,601,183 192,149 11,431,662
Fund balance - January 1 17,192,311 11,799,747 11,187,468 13,109,438 892,913 54,181,877
Fund balance - December 31 18,369,854$ 13,447,196$ 17,000,806$ 15,710,621$ 1,085,062$ 65,613,539$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
28
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES,
EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Total net change in fund balances - governmental funds 11,431,662$
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:
Capital outlays 8,938,029
Contributed assets (68,083)
Depreciation expense (9,184,823)
(167,950)
2,267,444
(10,950,000)
9,281,375
110,426
(494,872)
Net pension liability 23,824,193
Net OPEB obiligation (166,613)
Compensated absences payable (144,626)
Deferred outflows - pension plans (10,660,439)
Deferred inflows - pension plans (15,248,564)
348,341
Change in net position - governmental activities 9,115,500$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Capital assets are recorded in net position and the cost is allocated over their estimated useful lives as
depreciation expense. However, fund balances are reduced for the full cost of capital outlays at the
time of purchase.
Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities to individual
funds. The change in net position of the internal service funds is included in the governmental activities
in the Statement of Activities.
A gain or loss on the disposal of capital assets, including the difference between the carrying value and
any related sale proceeds, is included in the change in net position. However, only the sale proceeds and
insurance recoveries are included in the change fund balances.
Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources (property tax
and special assessment receivables) are not reported as revenues in the funds.
The amount of debt issued is reported in the governmental funds as a source of financing. Debt
obligations are not revenues in the Statement of Activities, but rather constitute long-term liabilities.
Certain expenses are included in the change in net position, but do not require the use of current
funds, and are not included in the change in fund balances.
The recognition of certain revenues and expenditures differ between the full accural governmental
activities financial statements and the modified accrual governmental fund financial statements.
Repayment of long-term debt does not affect the change in net position. However, it reduces fund
balances.
Debt issuance premiums and discounts are included in the change in net position as they are
amortized over the life of the debt. However, they are included in the change in fund balances upon
issuance as other financing sources and uses.
Interest on long-term debt is included in the change in net position as it accrues, regardless of when
payment is due. However, they are included in the change in fund balances when due.
29
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
December 31, 2017
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Assets:
Current assets:
Cash and investments 16,990,124$ 1,593,310$ 1,627,938$ 918,724$ 83,905$ 3,834,418$ 25,048,419$ 479,963$
Restricted cash and investments 2,961,937 - 83,537 2,549,446 1,640,530 - 7,235,450 -
Interest receivable 42,241 4,238 4,639 5,835 - 11,581 68,534 483
Accounts receivable, net 3,940,123 457 150 2,046 387,082 20,382 4,350,240 16,528
Special assessments receivable 293,592 - - - - - 293,592 -
Due from other governments 7,672 - - - - - 7,672 -
Prepaid expenses 477,406 - - 834 - - 478,240 288,595
Inventory 13,956 1,210,533 - 53,107 - 8,718 1,286,314 -
Total current assets 24,727,051 2,808,538 1,716,264 3,529,992 2,111,517 3,875,099 38,768,461 785,569
Noncurrent assets:
Net capital assets 97,776,714 1,576,386 2,311,578 11,728,752 9,252,874 9,323,610 131,969,914 -
Deferred outlflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 333,502 333,502 - 190,573 142,930 381,145 1,381,652 -
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 122,837,267 4,718,426 4,027,842 15,449,317 11,507,321 13,579,854 172,120,027 785,569
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 327,261 208,934 2,160 44,585 84,006 89,982 756,928 235,967
Salaries payable 42,498 36,458 - 19,857 21,778 46,039 166,630 -
Accrued interest payable 477,709 - 16,960 157,956 52,734 - 705,359 -
Contracts payable 323,740 - - 854,707 - 80,657 1,259,104 -
Due to other governments 5,827 148,062 141 3,863 8,374 18,274 184,541 -
Unearned revenue - 13,394 - 96,584 317 9,245 119,540 -
Compensated absences payable 65,378 118,116 - 87,599 25,672 60,854 357,619 -
Bonds payable - current 4,980,000 - 80,000 185,000 1,932,000 - 7,177,000 -
Total current liabilities 6,222,413 524,964 99,261 1,450,151 2,124,881 305,051 10,726,721 235,967
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 57,625 42,030 - 51,300 24,580 45,433 220,968 -
Net pension liability 1,238,739 1,238,739 - 707,851 530,888 1,415,701 5,131,918 -
Compensated absences payable 98,067 177,174 - 131,397 38,508 91,282 536,428 -
Bonds payable, net of
unamortized discounts and premiums 33,681,389 - 854,991 10,001,211 3,893,109 - 48,430,700 -
Total noncurrent liabilities 35,075,820 1,457,943 854,991 10,891,759 4,487,085 1,552,416 54,320,014 -
Deferred inflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 229,950 229,950 - 131,400 98,550 262,800 952,650 -
Total liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources 41,528,183 2,212,857 954,252 12,473,310 6,710,516 2,120,267 65,999,385 235,967
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 61,753,522 1,576,386 1,460,124 3,237,280 5,068,295 9,242,953 82,338,560 -
Restricted for debt service - - 1,338,276 - - - 1,338,276 -
Unrestricted 19,555,562 929,183 275,190 (261,273) (271,490) 2,216,634 22,443,806 549,602
Total net position 81,309,084$ 2,505,569$ 3,073,590$ 2,976,007$ 4,796,805$ 11,459,587$ 106,120,642$ 549,602$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
30
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Operating revenues:
Sales - liquor -$ 12,766,514$ -$ 7,305$ -$ -$ 12,773,819$ -$
Sales - retail - 225,250 6,050 91,739 38,958 42,504 404,501 -
Sales - utilities 19,153,949 - - - - - 19,153,949 -
Sales - concessions - - 120,138 3,109 316,432 174,277 613,956 -
Memberships - - 407,297 22,863 - 162,448 592,608 -
Admissions - - 370,365 346,461 63,070 738,191 1,518,087 -
Building rental - - 58,038 70,222 1,924,652 795,496 2,848,408 -
Rental of equipment - - - 44,153 5,879 132,242 182,274 -
Greens fees - - - 304,185 - 247,326 551,511 -
Other fees 2,206,313 - 969 364,375 158,028 1,056,144 3,785,829 942,886
Total operating revenues 21,360,262 12,991,764 962,857 1,254,412 2,507,019 3,348,628 42,424,942 942,886
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales and services - 9,442,254 47,330 82,968 109,842 80,002 9,762,396 -
Personal services 2,194,745 1,574,642 384,513 860,175 995,354 1,970,438 7,979,867 20,099
Contractual services 8,011,288 522,687 136,359 523,042 898,906 731,795 10,824,077 576,071
Commodities 901,481 74,304 72,368 140,868 100,109 348,990 1,638,120 -
Central Services 682,390 263,570 37,391 138,156 72,879 210,345 1,404,731 -
Depreciation 4,928,384 101,211 325,623 664,003 657,763 752,941 7,429,925 -
Total operating expenses 16,718,288 11,978,668 1,003,584 2,409,212 2,834,853 4,094,511 39,039,116 596,170
Operating income (loss)4,641,974 1,013,096 (40,727) (1,154,800) (327,834) (745,883) 3,385,826 346,716
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Intergovernmental 139,542 - - - - - 139,542 -
Investment income (charges) 159,125 14,142 16,892 25,669 530 38,632 254,990 1,625
Donations - - - - 50 28,638 28,688 -
Interest and fiscal charges (982,841) - (16,973) (208,374) (126,918) - (1,335,106) -
Amortization of bond premiums
(discounts) 339,470 - 5,229 22,304 (16) - 366,987 -
Gain (loss) on sale of capital assets 6,554 (29,217) - (873,839) - (798) (897,300) -
Miscellaneous 1,710 9,111 - - 1,173 1,745 13,739 -
Total nonoperating
revenues (expenses)(336,440) (5,964) 5,148 (1,034,240) (125,181) 68,217 (1,428,460) 1,625
Income (loss) before contributions
and transfers 4,305,534 1,007,132 (35,579) (2,189,040) (453,015) (677,666) 1,957,366 348,341
Contributions and transfers:
Intergovernmental 904,201 - - - - - 904,201 -
Capital contributions from other funds - - - 19,739 48,344 - 68,083 -
Transfers in - - - 200,000 283,887 292,971 776,858 -
Transfers out (100,000) (750,000) - - - - (850,000) -
Total contributions and transfers 804,201 (750,000) - 219,739 332,231 292,971 899,142 -
Change in net position 5,109,735 257,132 (35,579) (1,969,301) (120,784) (384,695) 2,856,508 348,341
Net position - January 1 76,199,349 2,248,437 3,109,169 4,945,308 4,917,589 11,844,282 103,264,134 201,261
Net position - December 31 81,309,084$2,505,569$ 3,073,590$ 2,976,007$ 4,796,805$ 11,459,587$106,120,642$ 549,602$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
31
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Cash flows from operating activities:
Receipts from customers and users 21,427,135$ 12,992,793$ 954,307$ 1,273,827$ 2,432,075$ 3,341,158$ 42,421,295$ 944,828$
Payment to suppliers (9,955,596) (10,305,397) (205,754) (860,569) (1,158,094) (1,349,331) (23,834,741) (419,311)
Payment to employees (2,122,941) (1,519,163) (384,513) (807,529) (951,627) (1,850,144) (7,635,917) (20,099)
Donations received - - - - 50 28,638 28,688 -
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities 9,348,598 1,168,233 364,040 (394,271) 322,404 170,321 10,979,325 505,418
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
State grant 139,542 - - - - - 139,542 -
Transfer from other funds - - - 200,000 283,887 292,971 776,858 -
Transfer to other funds (100,000) (750,000) - - - - (850,000) -
Proceeds from interfund borrowing - - - - - 44,719 44,719 -
Payment of interfund borrowing - - - - (44,719) - (44,719) (26,597)
Miscellaneous received 1,710 9,111 - - 1,173 1,745 13,739 -
Net cash provided by (used in)
noncapital financing activities 41,252 (740,889) - 200,000 240,341 339,435 80,139 (26,597)
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
State grant 904,201 - - - - - 904,201 0
Proceeds from capital debt 7,350,420 - 940,221 7,216,360 1,640,000 - 17,147,001 -
Acquisition of capital assets (6,618,816) (88,638) (846,020) (3,419,151) (120,141) (31,176) (11,123,942) -
Proceeds from disposals
of capital assets 6,554 - - 5,500 - - 12,054 -
Principal paid on bonds (5,040,000) - (85,000) (185,000) (230,000) - (5,540,000) -
Interest and fiscal charges paid on bonds (930,123) - (1,275) (87,984) (128,699) - (1,148,081) -
Net cash provided by (used in)
capital and related
financing activities (4,327,764) (88,638) 7,926 3,529,725 1,161,160 (31,176) 251,233 -
Cash flows from investing activities:
Interest received 139,931 13,138 16,356 22,493 530 36,237 228,685 1,142
Net increase (decrease)
in cash and investments 5,202,017 351,844 388,322 3,357,947 1,724,435 514,817 11,539,382 479,963
Cash and investments -
January 1 14,750,044 1,241,466 1,323,153 110,223 - 3,319,601 20,744,487 -
Cash and investments -
December 31 19,952,061$ 1,593,310$ 1,711,475$ 3,468,170$ 1,724,435$ 3,834,418$ 32,283,869$ 479,963$
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
32
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Governmental
Activities
Risk
Nonmajor Total Management
Aquatic Golf Enterprise Enterprise Internal
Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Funds Funds Service Fund
Business-type Activities - Enterprise Funds
Reconciliation of operating income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Operating income (loss) 4,641,974$ 1,013,096$ (40,727)$ (1,154,800)$ (327,834)$ (745,883)$ 3,385,826$ 346,716$
Adjustments to reconcile operating income
(loss) to net cash flows provided by
(used in) operating activities:
Depreciation 4,928,384 101,211 325,623 664,003 657,763 752,941 7,429,925 -
Donations - - - - 50 28,638 28,688 -
Changes in assets, deferred outflows of resources,
liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources:
Decrease (increase) in receivables (283,965) (48) (150) 9,326 (74,944) (7,470) (357,251) 1,942
Decrease (increase) in
special assessments 350,612 - - - - - 350,612 -
Decrease (increase) in
due from other governments 226 - - - - - 226 -
Decrease (increase) in inventory (1,977) 120,298 - 10,485 - (1,732) 127,074 -
Decrease (increase) in
prepaid expenses (441,406) - 86,275 (834) - - (355,965) 785
Decrease (increase) in deferred
outflows of resources 297,148 297,148 - 169,798 127,348 339,598 1,231,040 -
Increase (decrease) in
accounts payable 82,721 (124,669) 1,353 14,823 23,258 20,802 18,288 155,975
Increase (decrease) in
salaries payable 2,973 (300) - (2,320) 159 8,587 9,099 -
Increase (decrease) in
due to other governments 225 1,789 66 (9) 384 2,731 5,186 -
Increase (decrease) in
deposits payable - - (8,400) (5,000) - - (13,400) -
Increase (decrease) in
unearned revenue - 1,077 - 15,089 - - 16,166 -
Increase (decrease) in
net OPEB obligation 2,483 3,264 - 2,058 1,219 3,458 12,482 -
Increase (decrease) in
net pension liability (270,839) (270,839) - (154,765) (116,074) (309,531) (1,122,048) -
Increase (decrease) in
compensated absences (12,254) (26,087) - 7,994 8,664 18,419 (3,264) -
Increase (decrease) in deferred
inflows of resources 52,293 52,293 - 29,881 22,411 59,763 216,641 -
Total adjustments 4,706,624 155,137 404,767 760,529 650,238 916,204 7,593,499 158,702
Net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities 9,348,598$ 1,168,233$ 364,040$ (394,271)$ 322,404$ 170,321$ 10,979,325$ 505,418$
Noncash investing activities:
Increase (decrease) in
fair value of investments (14,765)$ (1,062)$ (618)$ 1,498$ -$ (2,564)$ (17,511)$ (477)$
Noncash capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets with
contracts payable (177,981)$ -$ -$ (806,806)$ 34,254$ (55,877)$ (1,006,410)$ -$
Capital assets contributed from
other funds -$ -$ -$ 19,739$ 48,344$ -$ 68,083$ -$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
33
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
AGENCY FUNDS
December 31, 2017
Agency Funds
Assets
Cash and investments 662,903$
Due from other governmental units 50,193
Total assets 713,096$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 240,181$
Salaries payable 8,731
Due to other governmental units 464,184
Total liabilities 713,096$
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
34
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
35
Note 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The City of Edina (the City) was incorporated in 1888 and operates under the State of Minnesota
Statutory Plan B form of government. The governing body consists of a five-member City Council
elected by voters of the City.
The financial statements of the City have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (generally accepted accounting principles) as
applied to governmental units by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The
following is a summary of significant accounting policies.
A. FINANCIAL REPORTING ENTITY
The City’s financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, (b)
organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other
organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary
government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity’s financial
statements to be misleading or incomplete. The primary government is financially
accountable for the component unit if it appoints a voting majority of the component unit’s
governing body and is able to impose its will on the component unit or there is a potential
for the component unit to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial
burdens on, the primary government.
As required by generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of the
reporting entity include those of the City of Edina (the primary government) and its
component units. The component unit discussed below is included in the City's reporting
entity because of the significance of its operational or financial relationships with the City.
COMPONENT UNIT
In conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, the financial statements of
the component unit have been included in the financial reporting entity as a blended
component unit.
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) is an entity legally separate from the
City. However, for financial reporting purposes, the HRA is reported as if it were part of
the City’s operations for two reasons. First, the HRA’s governing body is substantively the
same as the governing body of the City. Specifically, the HRA board consists of five
members, all of which are City Council members. Second, management of the City has
operational responsibility for the HRA. Specifically, sales of bonds or other obligations of
the HRA are approved by the City Council; the HRA follows the budget process for City
departments in accordance with City policy; the annual HRA budget is approved by City
Council; the HRA submits its plan for development and redevelopment to the City Council
for approval; lastly, the administrative structure and management practices and policies
of the HRA are approved by the City Council. The activity of the HRA is reported in the
Special Revenue Funds. Separate financial statements are not prepared for the HRA.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
36
B. GOVERNMENT-WIDE AND FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The government-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the
statement of activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the City.
Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental
revenues, are reported separately from business-type activities, which rely to a significant
extent on fees and charges for support.
The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a
given function or business-type activity are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses
are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or business-type activity.
Program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or
directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or
business-type activity and 2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the
operational or capital requirements of a particular function or business type activity.
Taxes and other items not included among program revenues are reported instead as
general revenues.
Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds,
and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government-wide
financial statements. Major individual governmental funds and major individual enterprise
funds are reported as separate columns in the fund financial statements. Aggregated
information for the remaining nonmajor governmental and enterprise funds is reported in
a single column in the fund financial statements
C. MEASUREMENT FOCUS, BASIS OF ACCOUNTING, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT
PRESENTATION
The government-wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources
measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as are the proprietary fund and
fiduciary fund financial statements. The City’s only fiduciary fund type, agency funds, are
custodial in nature and do not have a measurement focus. Revenues are recorded when
earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of
related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they
are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all eligibility
requirements imposed by the provider have been met.
Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial
resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues
are recognized as soon as they are both measurable and available. Revenues are
considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon
enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the City
considers all revenues, except reimbursement grants, to be available if they are collected
within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. Expenditures generally are recorded
when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service
expenditures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences, other post-
employment benefits (OPEB), net pension liabilities, and claims and judgments are
recorded only when payment is due.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
37
Property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for services
and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible
to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. Only the
portion of special assessments receivable due within the current fiscal period is
considered to be susceptible to accrual as revenue of the current period. All other
revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received
by the City.
The City reports the following major governmental funds:
The general fund is the government’s primary operating fund. It accounts for all
financial resources of the general government, except those required to be
accounted for in another fund.
The special revenue Housing and Redevelopment Authority fund is used to account
for revenues from several sources (property taxes, bond proceeds, investment
earnings, etc.) that are restricted for housing and redevelopment.
The debt service fund accounts for the payment of principal and interest on General
Obligation, Permanent Improvement Revolving, Public Project Revenue Bonds, and
Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds.
The capital projects construction fund accounts for the various special assessment
and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides financing for
capital improvements as restricted in the City’s capital improvement budget.
The City reports the following major proprietary funds:
The utility fund accounts for the provision of water, sewer and recycling services to
the City’s residents.
The liquor fund accounts for the operation of the City’s three liquor stores.
The aquatic center fund accounts for the operation of the City’s aquatic center.
The golf course fund accounts for the operation of the City’s two golf courses and a
golf dome.
The arena fund accounts for the operation of the City’s ice arena.
Additionally, the City reports the following fund types:
Internal service funds - the risk management internal service fund accounts for
worker’s compensation, volunteer accident, and property/casualty insurance. Internal
service funds operate in a manner similar to enterprise funds; however, it provides
services primarily to other departments within the City.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
38
Agency funds - the police seizure, Public Safety Training Facility, and Minnesota
Task Force 1 funds account for fees collected for other government agencies, and
the payroll fund accounts for payroll deductions withheld from employee paychecks
but not yet sent to the appropriate party (includes federal and state taxes, health care
deductions, etc).
As a general rule the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the
government-wide financial statements. Exceptions to this general rule are transactions
that would be treated as revenues, expenditures or expenses if they involved external
organizations, such as buying goods and services or payments in lieu of taxes, are
similarly treated when they involve other funds of the City of Edina. Elimination of these
charges would distort the direct costs and program revenues reported for the various
functions concerned.
Amounts reported as program revenues include 1) charges to customers or applicants for
goods, services, or privileges provided, 2) operating grants and contributions, and 3)
capital grants and contributions, including special assessments. Internally dedicated
resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise,
general revenues include all taxes.
Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items.
Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing
and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund’s principal ongoing operations.
The principal operating revenues of the City’s enterprise funds and internal service fund
are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for the enterprise
funds and internal service fund include the cost of sales and services, administrative
expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting
this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses.
Aggregated information for the internal service fund is reported in a single column in the
proprietary fund financial statements. Because the principal user of the internal services
is the City’s governmental activities, the financial statements of the internal service funds
are consolidated into the governmental column when presented in the government-wide
financial statements. The cost of these services is reported in the appropriate functional
activity.
Depreciation expense is included in the direct expenses of each function. Interest on
long-term debt is considered an indirect expense and is reported separately on the
Statement of Activities.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
39
D. CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash and Investments
The cash balances of the City and its component unit are pooled and invested for the
purpose of increasing earnings through investment activities. The pool’s investments are
reported at fair value at year end, except for investments in external investment pools,
which are stated at amortized cost. The City has the ability and intent to hold its
investments to maturity. The individual funds’ portions of the pool’s fair value are
presented as “Cash and investments.” Earnings from such investments are allocated to
the respective funds on the basis of applicable cash balance participation by each fund.
The City provides temporary advances to funds that have insufficient cash and
investment balances by means of an advance from another fund shown as interfund
receivables in the advancing fund, and an interfund payable in the fund with the deficit,
until adequate resources are received. These interfund balances are eliminated on the
government-wide financial statements.
The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy
established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the
valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other
observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs.
Debt securities classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are valued using
evaluations based on various market and industry inputs.
See Note 2 for the City’s recurring fair value measurements as of the current year-end.
Restricted Cash and Investments
Restricted cash and investments represent bond proceeds held for specific purposes.
Earnings on these investments are allocated directly to these funds.
Cash Equivalents
For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the City considers all highly liquid debt
instruments with an original maturity from the time of purchase by the City of three
months or less to be cash equivalents. The proprietary funds’ portion in the government-
wide cash and investment management pool is considered to be cash equivalent.
E. RECEIVABLES AND PAYABLES
During the course of operations, numerous transactions occur between individual funds
for goods provided or services rendered. Short-term interfund loans are classified as “due
to/from other funds.” All short-term interfund receivables and payables at December 31,
2017 are planned to be eliminated in 2018. Any residual balances outstanding between
the governmental activities and business-type activities are reported in the government-
wide financial statements as “internal balances.”
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
40
Property taxes and special assessments receivables have been reported net of estimated
uncollectible accounts. Because utility bills are considered liens on property, no
estimated uncollectible amounts are established. Uncollectible amounts are not material
for other receivables and have not been reported.
F. REVENUE RECOGNITION
1. PROPERTY TAX REVENUE RECOGNITION
The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County in
December (levy/assessment date) of each year for collection in the following
year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for
itself, the City, the local School District and other taxing authorities. Such taxes
become a lien on January 1 and are recorded as receivables by the City at that
date. Real property taxes are payable (by property owners) on May 15 and
October 15 of each calendar year. Personal property taxes are payable by
taxpayers on February 28 and June 30 of each year. These taxes are collected
by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 7 and December 2 of the
same year. Delinquent collections for November and December are received the
following January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes
by property owners. The County possesses this authority.
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes property tax revenue in the period for which the taxes were
levied. Uncollectible property taxes are not material and have not been reported.
GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and
available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current and
delinquent taxes and State credits received by the City in July, December and
January are recognized as revenue for the current year. Taxes collected by the
County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following January) and taxes
and credits not received at the year-end are classified as delinquent and due
from County taxes receivable. The portion of delinquent taxes not collected by
the City in January are fully offset by deferred inflows of resources because they
are not available to finance current expenditures.
2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REVENUE RECOGNITION
Special assessments are levied against benefited properties for the cost or a
portion of the cost of special assessment improvement projects in accordance
with State Statutes. These assessments are collectible by the City over a term of
years usually consistent with the term of the related bond issue. Collection of
annual installments (including interest) is handled by the County Auditor in the
same manner as property taxes. Property owners are allowed to (and often do)
prepay future installments without interest or prepayment penalties.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
41
Once a special assessment roll is adopted, the amount attributed to each parcel
is a lien upon that property until full payment is made or the amount is
determined to be excessive by the City Council or court action. If special
assessments are allowed to go delinquent, the property is subject to tax forfeit
sale. Pursuant to State Statutes, a property shall be subject to a tax forfeit sale
after three years unless it is homesteaded, agricultural or seasonal recreational
land in which event the property is subject to such sale after five years.
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The City recognizes special assessment revenue in the period that the
assessment roll was adopted by the City Council. Uncollectible special
assessments are not material and have not been reported.
GOVERNMENTAL FUND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Revenue from special assessments is recognized by the City when it becomes
measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current fiscal period. In
practice, current and delinquent special assessments received by the City are
recognized as revenue for the current year. Special assessments that are
collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City the following
January) and are also recognized as revenue for the current year. All remaining
delinquent, deferred and special deferred assessments receivable in
governmental funds are completely offset by deferred inflows of resources. The
following is a breakdown of special assessments receivable at December 31,
2017:
Enterprise
Funds
Debt
Service Construction Utilities
Special assessments receivable
Delinquent 35,453$ -$ 32,839$
Deferred 2,440,575 20,752,210 260,753
Total 2,476,028$ 20,752,210$ 293,592$
Governmental Funds
G. INVENTORIES AND PREPAID ITEMS
Inventories of the proprietary funds are stated at cost and are recorded as expenses
when consumed rather than when purchased. All inventories use the first-in/first-out
(FIFO) method.
Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are
recorded as prepaid items in both government-wide and fund financial statements and
are recorded as expenditures or expenses when consumed.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
42
H. CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital assets, which include property, buildings, improvements, equipment, parks,
infrastructure assets (roads, bridges, sidewalks, and similar items), and intangible assets
such as easements, are reported in the applicable governmental or business-type
activities columns in the government-wide financial statements. Capital assets are also
reported in the proprietary fund financial statements but not in the governmental fund
financial statements.
Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial, individual cost of
more than $10,000 (amount not rounded) and an estimated useful life in excess of three
years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if
purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated acquisition
value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not
add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized.
Infrastructure assets include all of the City’s assets since inception.
Property, plant and equipment of the primary government are depreciated using the
straight line method over the following estimated useful lives:
Assets Life
Golf course 10 - 35 years
Land improvements 15 - 50 years
Buildings and structures 15 - 40 years
Furniture and office equipment 5 - 10 years
Vehicles and equipment 3 - 20 years
Parks 5 - 100 years
Utility infrastructure 20 - 50 years
Capital assets that are not depreciated include land, easements, and construction in
progress.
I. COMPENSATED ABSENCES
It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and
sick pay benefits. All vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government-wide and
proprietary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is reported in
governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee
resignations and retirements. In accordance with the provisions of generally accepted
accounting principles no liability is recorded for nonvesting accumulating rights to receive
sick pay benefits. However, a liability is recognized in the government-wide and
proprietary fund financial statements for that portion of accumulating sick leave benefits
that is vested as severance pay. According to City policy, vested sick leave benefits are
liquidated into a health care savings plan upon separation.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
43
J. STATE-WIDE PENSION PLANS
For purposes of measuring the net pension liability, deferred outflows/inflows of
resources, and pension expense, information about the fiduciary net position of the Public
Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and additions to/deductions from the PERA’s
fiduciary net position have been determined on the same basis as they are reported by
the PERA except that the PERA’s fiscal year-end is June 30. For this purpose, plan
contributions are recognized as of employer payroll paid dates and benefit payments and
refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the benefit terms.
Investments are reported at fair value.
The PERA has a special funding situation created by a direct aid contribution made by
the state of Minnesota. The direct aid is a result of the merger of the Minneapolis
Employees Retirement Fund in the PERA on January 1, 2015.
K. LONG-TERM OBLIGATIONS
In the government-wide financial statements and proprietary fund types in the fund
financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as
liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business-type activities, or proprietary
fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and
amortized over the life of the bond using the straight-line method. Bonds payable are
reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount.
In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and
discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of
debt issued plus any premium received is reported as other financing sources. Discounts
on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not
withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service
expenditures.
L. DEFERRED OUTFLOWS/INFLOWS OF RESOURCES
In addition to assets, the statement of financial position will sometimes report a separate
section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element,
deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net position that applies to a
future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources
(expense/expenditure) until then. The City has one item that qualifies for reporting in this
category. It is the deferred outflows of resources related to pensions reported in the
government-wide and enterprise funds Statement of Net Position. This deferred outflow
results from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of
assumptions, differences between projected and actual earnings on pension plan
investments, and contributions to the plan subsequent to the measurement date and
before the end of the reporting period. These amounts are deferred and amortized as
required under pension standards.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
44
In addition to liabilities, statements of financial position or balance sheets will sometimes
report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial
statement element represents an acquisition of net position that applies to future periods
and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The City
has two items which qualify for reporting in this category.
The first item, unavailable revenue, is reported only in the governmental funds Balance
Sheet. The governmental funds report unavailable revenue from two sources: property
taxes and special assessments. These amounts are deferred and recognized as an
inflow of resources in the period the amounts become available.
The second item, deferred inflows of resources related to pensions, is reported in the
government-wide and enterprise fund Statement of Net Position. This deferred inflow
results from differences between expected and actual experience, changes of
assumptions, and the difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan
investments. These amounts are deferred and amortized as required under pension
standards.
M. INTERFUND TRANSACTIONS
Interfund services provided and used are accounted for as revenues, expenditures or
expenses. Transactions that constitute reimbursements to a fund for
expenditures/expenses initially made from it that are properly applicable to another fund,
are recorded as expenditures/expenses in the reimbursing fund and as reductions of
expenditures/expenses in the fund that is reimbursed. Interfund loans are reported as an
interfund loan receivable or payable which offsets the movement of cash between funds.
All other interfund transactions are reported as transfers and are eliminated to the extent
possible on the government-wide statements.
N. FUND BALANCE CLASSIFICATION
In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report fund balance in classifications
that disclose constraints for which amounts in those funds can be spent. These
classifications are as follows:
Nonspendable – Consists of amounts that are not in spendable form, such as
prepaid items, inventory, and other long-term assets.
Restricted – Consists of amounts related to externally imposed constraints
established by creditors, grantors, or contributors; or constraints imposed by state
statutory provisions.
Committed – Consists of internally imposed constraints that are established by
resolution of the City Council. Those committed amounts cannot be used for any
other purpose unless the City Council removes or changes the specified use by
taking the same type of action it employed to previously commit those amounts.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
45
Assigned – Consists of internally imposed constraints. These constraints consist of
amounts intended to be used by the City for specific purposes but do not meet the
criteria to be classified as restricted or committed. In the general fund, assigned
amounts represent intended uses established by the City Council. In the fund
balance policy, authority to assign amounts for specific purposes is limited to the City
Council.
Unassigned – The residual classification for the general fund which also reflects
negative residual amounts in other funds.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy
to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed.
When committed, assigned, or unassigned resources are available for use, it is the City’s
policy to use resources in the following order: 1) committed, 2) assigned, and 3)
unassigned.
O. NET POSITION
In the government-wide and proprietary fund financial statements, net position represents
the difference between assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, and deferred
inflows of resources. Net position is displayed in three components:
Net investment in capital assets - Consists of capital assets, net of accumulated
depreciation, reduced by the outstanding balance of any long-term debt used to build
or acquire the capital assets.
Restricted net position – Consists of net position restricted when there are
limitations imposed on their use through external restrictions imposed by creditors,
grantors, or laws or regulations of other governments.
Unrestricted net position – All other net position that do not meet the definition of
“restricted” or “net investment in capital assets.”
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available for use, it is the City’s policy
to first use restricted resources, and then use unrestricted resources as they are needed.
P. USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates that affect amounts
reported in the financial statements during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from such estimates.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
46
Note 2 CASH AND INVESTMENTS
A. COMPONENTS OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS
Cash and investments at year-end consist of the following:
Deposits (163,338)$
Cash on hand 18,890
Investments 100,984,356
100,839,908$
Cash and investments are presented in the financial statements as follows:
Cash and investments - Statement of Net Position 83,288,226$
Restricted cash and investments - Statement of Net Position 16,888,779
Cash and investments - Statement of Fiduciary Net Position 662,903
100,839,908$
The negative deposits are a result of outstanding checks as of December 31, 2017.
When checks are cashed, funds are automatically transferred from the City’s money
market investment account into the City’s operating bank account.
The City had restricted investments of $16,888,779 as of December 31, 2017 that
represent unspent bond proceeds to be used for construction projects and debt
payments.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
47
B. DEPOSITS
In accordance with applicable Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at
depository banks authorized by the City Council, including checking accounts, savings
accounts and certificates of deposit.
The following is considered the most significant risk associated with deposits:
Custodial credit risk – In the case of deposits, this is the risk that in the event of
a bank failure, the City’s deposits may be lost.
Minnesota Statutes require that all deposits be protected by federal deposit
insurance, corporate surety bond, or collateral. The market value of collateral
pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by federal deposit
insurance or corporate surety bonds. Authorized collateral includes treasury bills,
notes, and bonds; issues of U.S. government agencies; general obligations rated
“A” or better; revenue obligations rated “AA” or better; irrevocable standard
letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank; and certificates of
deposit. Minnesota Statutes require that securities pledged as collateral be held
in safekeeping in a restricted account at the Federal Reserve Bank or in an
account at a trust department of a commercial bank or other financial institution
that is not owned or controlled by the financial institution furnishing the collateral.
The City’s investment policy does not contain further restrictions on the types of
collateral required.
At year-end, the carrying amount of the City’s deposits was $(163,338) while the
balance on the bank records was $382,117. At December 31, 2017, all deposits
were fully covered by federal depository insurance, surety bonds, or by collateral
held by the City’s agent in the City’s name.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
48
C. INVESTMENTS
The City has the following investments at year end:
Fair Value
Measurements
Rating Agency Using < 1 1 to 5 6 to 10 > 10 Total
U.S. Treasuries AA+ S&P Level 1 264,751$ -$ 457,952$ 837,607$ 1,560,310$
SBA Notes AA+ S&P Level 1 - 96,718 108,562 - 205,280
U.S. Agencies AA+ S&P Level 2 1,375,456 9,042,722 1,093,357 2,378,929 13,890,464
Commerical Paper A1+ S&P Level 2 4,243,189 - - - 4,243,189
Municipals AAA S&P Level 2 - 1,071,445 81,685 - 1,153,130
Municipals AA+ S&P Level 2 1,126,585 1,024,187 805,000 180,000 3,135,772
Municipals AA S&P Level 2 783,087 1,313,397 40,623 - 2,137,107
Municipals A+ S&P Level 2 - - 32,639 - 32,639
Municipals Aaa Mdy's Level 2 - 1,000,170 - - 1,000,170
Municipals Aa1 Mdy's Level 2 1,693,745 249,630 29,821 - 1,973,196
Municipals Aa2 Mdy's Level 2 248,478 1,255,711 183,344 - 1,687,533
Municipals Aa3 Mdy's Level 2 - 989,465 - - 989,465
Negotiable CD's N/R N/A Level 2 10,528,755 10,561,120 235,445 - 21,325,320
20,264,046$ 26,604,565$ 3,068,428$ 3,396,536$ 53,333,575
Money Market*AAAm S&P Level 2 31,939,141
4M Fund* N/R N/A N/A 15,711,640
Total investments 100,984,356$
N/A - Not Applicable
N/R - Not Rated
* - The City's money market investments do not have maturities
Credit Risk
Investment
Maturity Duration in Years
Interest Risk -
The Minnesota Municipal Money Market Fund (4M Fund) is regulated by Minnesota
Statutes and the Board of Directors of the League of Minnesota Cities. The 4M Fund is
an external investment pool not registered with the Securities Exchange Commission
(SEC) that follows the same regulatory rules of the SEC. The City’s investment in the 4M
Fund is measured at amortized cost which approximates fair value. The fair value of its
position in the pool is the same as the value of the pool shares. The fund does not have
any limitations or restrictions on participant withdrawals.
Investments are subject to various risks, the following of which are considered the most
significant:
Custodial credit risk – For investments, this is the risk that in the event of a
failure of the counterparty to an investment transaction (typically a broker-dealer)
the City would not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral
securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The City’s investment
policy specifically addresses custodial credit risk, requiring the City to limit its
exposure by purchasing insured or registered investments, or by the control of
who holds the securities.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
49
Credit risk – This is the risk that an issuer or other counterparty to an investment
will not fulfill its obligations. Minnesota Statutes limit the City’s investments to
direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies;
shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment
Company Act of 1940 that receive the highest credit rating, are rated in one of
the two highest rating categories by a statistical rating agency, and all of the
investments have a final maturity of thirteen months or less; general obligations
rated “AA” or better; general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency rated “A” or better; bankers’ acceptances of United States banks eligible
for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; commercial paper issued by
United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries, rated of the highest
quality category by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies, and
maturing in 270 days or less; Guaranteed Investment Contracts guaranteed by a
United States commercial bank, domestic branch of a foreign bank, or a United
States insurance company, and with a credit quality in one of the top two highest
categories; repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending
agreements with financial institutions qualified as a “depository” by the
government entity, with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System
with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, that are a primary reporting dealer in
U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain
Minnesota securities broker-dealers. The City’s investment policies specifically
address credit risk, further limiting the City’s exposure to credit risk by requiring
that all state and local government obligations to be rated “AA” or better by a
national rating agency.
Concentration risk – This is the risk associated with investing a significant
portion of the City’s investment (considered 5 percent or more) in the securities
of a single issuer, excluding U.S. guaranteed investments (such as Treasuries),
investment pools, and mutual funds. The City’s investment policies specifically
address the City’s desire to limit concentration risk, but do not set specific
guidelines for measurement of this risk. At year-end, the City did not hold any
investments with a concentration greater than 5 percent.
Interest rate risk – This is the risk of potential variability in the fair value of fixed
rate investment resulting in changes in interest rates (the longer the period for
which an interest rate is fixed, the greater the risk). The City’s investment policies
specifically address the City’s desire to limit interest rate risk, but do not set
specific guidelines for measurement of this risk.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
50
Note 3 CAPITAL ASSETS
Capital asset activity for the year ended December 31, 2017 is as follows:
Beginning Ending
Balance Increases Decreases Transfers Balance
Governmental activities:
Capital assets not being depreciated:
Land 22,066,283$ -$ -$ -$ 22,066,283$
Easements 253,000 - - - 253,000
Construction in progress 12,176,272 7,604,177 (12,905,674) - 6,874,775
Total capital assets not being depreciated 34,495,555 7,604,177 (12,905,674) - 29,194,058
Capital assets being depreciated:
Land improvements 24,494,391 886,409 (117,978) - 25,262,822
Buildings and structures 64,027,086 48,344 - (48,344) 64,027,086
Furniture and office equipment 4,198,472 - - - 4,198,472
Vehicles and equipment 16,037,676 1,505,874 (1,143,082) (19,739) 16,380,729
Infrastructure 120,605,784 11,798,899 (957,633) - 131,447,050
Parks 22,309,866 - (34,010) - 22,275,856
Total capital assets being depreciated 251,673,275 14,239,526 (2,252,703) (68,083) 263,592,015
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Land improvements (17,479,351) (745,066) 88,510 - (18,135,907)
Buildings and structures (22,027,357) (1,800,738) - - (23,828,095)
Furniture and office equipment (3,326,142) (274,398) - - (3,600,540)
Vehicles and equipment (10,699,622) (1,324,283) 1,063,256 - (10,960,649)
Infrastructure (57,120,998) (3,992,521) 898,977 - (60,214,542)
Parks (10,516,053) (1,047,817) 34,010 - (11,529,860)
Total accumulated depreciation (121,169,523) (9,184,823) 2,084,753 - (128,269,593)
Total capital assets being depreciated, net 130,503,752 5,054,703 (167,950) (68,083) 135,322,422
Governmental activities capital assets, net 164,999,307$ 12,658,880$ (13,073,624)$ (68,083)$ 164,516,480$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
51
Beginning Ending
Balance Increases Decreases Transfers Balance
Business-type activities:
Capital assets not being depreciated:
Land 285,341$ -$ -$ -$ 285,341$
Easements - 35,600 - - 35,600
Construction in progress 9,259,425 11,712,225 (9,215,209) - 11,756,441
Total capital assets not being depreciated 9,544,766 11,747,825 (9,215,209) - 12,077,382
Capital assets being depreciated:
Land improvements & golf course 11,374,875 880,806 (3,720,692) - 8,534,989
Buildings and structures 38,496,071 387,106 (98,623) 48,344 38,832,898
Furniture and office equipment 153,303 - (12,855) - 140,448
Vehicles and equipment 12,473,080 592,073 (256,263) 19,739 12,828,629
Utility infrastructure 131,610,194 7,737,750 (213,552) - 139,134,392
Lease property capital lease 430,614 - - - 430,614
Total capital assets being depreciated 194,538,137 9,597,735 (4,301,985) 68,083 199,901,970
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Land improvements & golf course (6,115,947) (457,258) 2,845,352 - (3,727,853)
Buildings and structures (15,289,022) (1,697,437) 93,826 - (16,892,633)
Furniture and office equipment (149,441) (1,547) 12,855 - (138,133)
Vehicles and equipment (5,738,706) (811,479) 227,046 - (6,323,139)
Utility infrastructure (48,248,414) (4,462,204) 213,552 - (52,497,066)
Lease property capital lease (430,614) - - - (430,614)
Total accumulated depreciation (75,972,144) (7,429,925) 3,392,631 - (80,009,438)
Total capital assets being depreciated, net 118,565,993 2,167,810 (909,354) 68,083 119,892,532
Business-type activities capital assets, net 128,110,759$ 13,915,635$ (10,124,563)$ 68,083$ 131,969,914$
The conservation and sustainability (CAS) fund contributed energy efficient building
improvements with a cost of $48,344 to the arena and the braemar memorial fund contributed
equipment with a cost of $19,739 to the golf course fund.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
52
Depreciation expense was charged to functions/programs of the primary government as follows:
Governmental activities:
General government 499,566$
Public safety 1,047,540
Public works 5,293,069
Parks 2,344,648
Total depreciation expense - governmental activities 9,184,823$
Business-type activities:
Utilities 4,928,384$
Liquor 101,211
Aquatic Center 325,623
Golf Course 664,003
Arena 657,763
Art Center 22,032
Edinborough Park 183,781
Centennial Lakes 35,551
Sports Dome 511,577
Total depreciation expense - business-type activities 7,429,925$
CONSTRUCTION COMMITMENTS
At December 31, 2017, the City had construction project contracts in progress. The commitments
related to the remaining contract balances are summarized as follows:
Contract Remaining
Project # Project Description Amount Commitment
17-3 Eng Countryside G Neighborhood 1,227,331$ 48,459$
17-1 Eng Parklawn Avenue Neighborhood 2,669,959 210,416
17-9 Eng Presidents Area Sewer Rehab 235,289 43,023
16-14 Eng Wooddale Bridge Storm Sewer 58,410 4,014
NA Well #9 415,931 19,430
NA Golf Course 5,303,713 699,609
1,024,951$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
53
Note 4 LONG-TERM DEBT
The City has five types of bonded debt outstanding at December 31, 2017: general obligation
bonds, permanent improvement revolving bonds, public project revenue bonds, Edina emerald
energy program revenue bonds and G.O. revenue bonds. The first type is payable from general
property taxes. The second type is payable solely from special assessments with any deficiency
to be provided for by general property taxes. The third type is payable solely from annual
appropriation lease payments received from the City of Edina pursuant to a lease between the
Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City. The fourth type is payable solely from
special assessments. The fifth type is payable primarily from enterprise revenue with any
deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The reporting entity’s long-term debt is
segregated between the amounts to be repaid from governmental activities and amounts to be
repaid from business-type activities.
GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
As of December 31, 2017, the governmental long-term bonded debt of the financial reporting
entity consisted of the following:
Final
Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable
Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2017
General Obligation Bonds:
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2009A 3.00-4.40% 4/29/2009 2/1/2018 14,000,000 10,105,000
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2010A 2.00-4.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2021 8,285,000 3,370,000
General Obligation - Capital Improvement Plan, 2013A - Refunding 3.00-3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 5,710,000 4,565,000
General Obligation - 2016A - Refunding 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2028 3,635,000 3,635,000
General Obligation - 2017C - Refunding 2.05-4.00% 12/14/2017 2/1/2029 8,955,000 8,955,000
Total General Obligation Bonds 40,585,000 30,630,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds:
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2010B 2.00-3.00% 11/18/2010 2/1/2022 2,305,000 1,210,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2011A 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2023 3,320,000 2,080,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2029 2,675,000 2,240,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2012A - Refunding 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2019 1,990,000 585,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2013A 3.00-3.50% 10/10/2013 2/1/2030 2,555,000 2,275,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2014B - Refunding 2.00-3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2020 4,075,000 2,540,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2015A 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2032 6,545,000 6,545,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2015A - Parking 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2036 2,495,000 2,400,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2016A 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2033 3,940,000 3,940,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving, 2017A 3.00-4.00% 6/29/2017 2/1/2034 1,995,000 1,995,000
Total PIR Bonds 31,895,000 25,810,000
Public Project Revenue Bonds:
Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10-4.55% 11/24/2009 2/1/2030 2,595,000 1,645,000
Public Project Revenue, Series 2014A 2.00-3.625% 7/15/2014 2/1/2035 16,155,000 14,910,000
Public Project Revenue, Series 2015A - Refunding 2.50-3.00% 7/9/2015 5/1/2026 3,490,000 2,930,000
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 22,240,000 19,485,000
Edina Emerald Energy Program (EEEP) Revenue Bonds:
Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds, 2012A 7.00% 2/25/2012 1/1/2023 33,690 16,845
Total bonded indebtedness - governmental activities 94,753,690$ 75,941,845$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
54
BUSINESS-TYPE ACTIVITIES
Final
Interest Issue Maturity Original Payable
Rates Date Date Issue 12/31/2017
Revenue Bonds:
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009C 2.00-4.00% 12/10/2009 2/1/2018 2,440,000 1,750,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B .45-1.60% 11/15/2012 2/1/2020 815,000 330,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00-3.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2033 2,100,000 2,100,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00-3.45% 10/10/2013 2/1/2029 1,125,000 945,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2015B 2.00-3.25% 7/9/2015 2/1/2031 2,140,000 2,020,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2017B 3.00-4.00% 6/29/2017 2/1/2033 7,425,000 7,425,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2017D - Refunding 2.00% 12/20/2017 2/1/2030 1,640,000 1,640,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00-3.00% 10/27/2011 2/1/2022 11,230,000 5,945,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00-4.00% 11/15/2012 2/1/2023 6,100,000 3,960,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00-3.00% 7/15/2014 2/1/2024 5,680,000 4,060,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00% 12/11/2014 2/1/2019 5,710,000 2,960,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A 2.00-4.00% 7/9/2015 2/1/2025 5,235,000 4,235,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2.00-3.00% 7/6/2016 2/1/2027 8,775,000 8,775,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 3.00-4.00% 6/29/2017 2/1/2028 6,595,000 6,595,000
Total bonded indebtedness - business-type activities 67,010,000$ 52,740,000$
Annual debt service requirements to maturity for the City’s bonds are as follows:
Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest
2018 11,475,000$ 733,895$ 2,480,000$ 746,023$ 1,045,000$ 607,198$
2019 2,055,000 588,775 2,630,000 668,163 1,080,000 574,566
2020 2,180,000 510,175 2,570,000 599,675 1,115,000 540,690
2021 2,250,000 427,825 1,750,000 543,600 1,145,000 505,649
2022 1,405,000 361,125 1,795,000 489,300 1,185,000 472,949
2023-2027 7,795,000 1,048,183 6,895,000 1,731,088 6,105,000 1,806,443
2028-2032 3,470,000 108,633 6,415,000 700,670 4,710,000 951,508
2033-2036 - - 1,275,000 63,206 3,100,000 170,475
Total 30,630,000$ 3,778,611$ 25,810,000$ 5,541,725$ 19,485,000$ 5,629,478$
Principal Interest Principal Interest
2018 -$ 590$ 7,177,000$ 1,543,295$
2019 3,369 1,061 6,534,000 1,310,645
2020 3,369 825 5,171,000 1,139,740
2021 3,369 590 5,324,000 980,410
2022 3,369 354 5,476,000 812,770
2023-2027 3,369 118 16,947,000 2,121,351
2028-2032 - - 5,376,000 447,251
2033 - - 735,000 11,025
Total 16,845$ 3,538$ 52,740,000$ 8,366,487$
Governmental Activities
General Public Improvement
Obligation Bonds Revolving Bonds
Public Project
Revenue Bonds
Year Ending
December 31
Year Ending
December 31
Governmental Activities
Edina Emerald Energy Program
Revenue Bonds Bonds
Business-type Activities
Revenue
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
55
CHANGE IN LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Long-term liability activity for the year ended December 31, 2017, was as follows:
Beginning Ending Due Within
Balance Additions Reductions Balance One Year
Governmental activities:
Bonds payable:
General obligation 27,935,000$ 8,955,000$ (6,260,000)$ 30,630,000$ 11,475,000$
PIR 25,920,000 1,995,000 (2,105,000) 25,810,000 2,480,000
Public project revenue 20,390,000 - (905,000) 19,485,000 1,045,000
EEEP revenue 28,220 - (11,375) 16,845 -
Less deferred amounts:
Discount on bonds (405,596) (51,148) 42,772 (413,972) -
Premiums 1,989,676 798,791 (295,543) 2,492,924 -
Total bonds payable 75,857,300 11,697,643 (9,534,146) 78,020,797 15,000,000
Compensated absences 4,030,600 1,949,663 (1,805,037) 4,175,226 1,670,090
Governmental activity
Long-term liabilities 79,887,900$ 13,647,306$ (11,339,183)$ 82,196,023$ 16,670,090$
Business-type activities:
Bonds payable:
Revenue bonds 42,620,000$ 15,660,000$ (5,540,000)$ 52,740,000$ 7,177,000$
Less deferred amounts:
Discount on bonds (133,653) (88,558) 20,216 (201,995) -
Premiums 1,881,340 1,575,559 (387,204) 3,069,695 -
Total bonds payable 44,367,687 17,147,001 (5,906,988) 55,607,700 7,177,000
Compensated absences 897,311 282,082 (285,346) 894,047 357,619
Business-type activity
Long-term liabilities 45,264,998$ 17,429,083$ (6,192,334)$ 56,501,747$ 7,534,619$
For governmental activities, compensated absences are generally liquidated by the general
fund.
In 2016, the City issued $3,635,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2016A to finance a
crossover refunding of the 2018 through 2028 maturities of the City’s $5,865,000 General
Obligation capital improvement plan bonds, Series 2007A. Savings from the current proceeds
were placed in escrow and the General Obligation capital improvement plan bonds, Series
2007A were redeemed February 1, 2017. The crossover refunding was undertaken to reduce
total debt service payments by $565,794 and resulted in an economic gain of $512,801. The
City anticipates that ad valorem taxes will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this
issuance.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
56
In 2017, the City issued $8,955,000 of General Obligation bonds, Series 2017C to finance a
current refunding of the 2019 through 2030 maturities of the City’s $14,000,000 General
Obligation capital improvement plan bonds, Series 2009A. Savings from the current proceeds
were not placed in escrow. The General Obligation capital improvement plan bonds, Series
2009A will be redeemed February 1, 2018. The current refunding was undertaken to reduce
total debt service payments by $1,440,308 and resulted in an economic gain of $1,186,683.
The City anticipates that ad valorem taxes will be sufficient to pay future debt service on this
issuance. The City also issued $1,640,000 of General Obligation recreational revenue bonds,
series 2017D to finance a current refunding of the 2019 through 2030 maturities of the City’s
$2,440,000 General Obligation Recreational Revenue bonds, Series 2009C. Savings from
the current proceeds were not placed in escrow. The General Obligation recreational
revenues bonds, Series 2009C will be redeemed February 1, 2018. The current refunding
was undertaken to reduce total debt service payments by $235,874 and resulted in an
economic gain of $202,100. The City anticipates Arena revenue will be sufficient to pay future
debt service on this issuance.
REVENUE PLEDGED
Future revenue pledged for the payment of long-term debt is as follows:
% of Total Remaining Principal Pledged
Debt Term of Principal and Interest Revenue
Bond Issue Use of Proceeds Type Service Pledge and Interest Paid Received
2009C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2010-2030 1,784,025$ 174,625$ 2,507,019$
2012B Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2013-2020 336,839 130,280 2,507,019
2012C Recreational Facility Bonds Arena improvements Arena 100% 2013-2033 2,625,709 53,794 2,507,019
2013B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf dome improvements Golf 100% 2014-2029 1,138,177 95,540 1,254,412
2015B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf course improvements Golf 100% 2016-2031 2,471,035 177,444 1,254,412
2017B Recreational Facility Bonds Golf course improvements Golf 100% 2018-2033 8,731,070 - 1,254,412
2017B Recreational Facility Bonds Pool improvements Pool 100% 2018-2027 1,019,987 - 962,857
2017D Recreational Facility Bonds Refunding 2009C Arena 100% 2018-2030 1,857,026 - 2,507,019
2011A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2012-2022 6,376,975 1,281,600 21,360,262
2012A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2013-2023 4,339,675 717,650 21,360,262
2014A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2014-2024 4,461,025 640,250 21,360,262
2014B Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2014-2019 3,049,550 2,468,975 21,360,262
2015A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2016-2025 4,811,400 603,150 21,360,262
2016A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2017-2027 9,972,756 258,498 21,360,262
2017A Utility Revenue Bonds Utility infrastructure Utility 100% 2018-2028 8,131,239 - 21,360,262
Revenue Pledged Current Year
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
57
Note 5 LEGAL DEBT MARGIN
The City is subject to a statutory limitation by the State of Minnesota for bonded indebtedness
payable principally from property taxes. The City of Edina's legal debt margin for 2017 is
computed as follows:
December 31, 2017
Market Value (after fiscal disparities) 10,785,198,454$
Debt Limit (3% of Market Value) 323,555,954$
Amount of debt applicable to debt limit:
Total bonded debt 128,681,845$
Less:
Public improvement revolving bonds (25,810,000)
Revenue bonds (52,740,000)
EEEP revenue bonds (16,845)
Total debt applicable to debt limit 50,115,000$
Legal debt margin 273,440,954$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
58
Note 6 DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS - STATEWIDE
The City participates in various pension plans, total pension expense for the year ended
December 31, 2017 was $5,324,060. The components of pension expense are noted in the
following plan summaries:
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
The City participates in the following cost-sharing multiple-employer defined benefit
pension plans administered by the PERA. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are
established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and
356. PERA’s defined benefit pension plans are tax qualified plans under Section 401 (a)
of the Internal Revenue Code.
1. General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF)
All full-time and certain part-time employees of the City are covered by the General
Employees Retirement Fund (GERF). GERF members belong to either the
Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social
Security and Basic Plan members are not. The Basic Plan was closed to new members
in 1967. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan.
2. Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF)
The PEPFF, originally established for police officers and firefighters not covered by a
local relief association, now covers all police officers and firefighters hired since 1980.
Effective July 1, 1999, the PEPFF also covers police officers and firefighters belonging
to local relief associations that elected to merge with and transfer assets and
administration to the PERA.
B. BENEFITS PROVIDED
The PERA provides retirement, disability, and death benefits. Benefit provisions are
established by state statute and can only be modified by the State Legislature.
Benefit increases are provided to benefit recipients each January. Increases are related
to the funding ratio of the plan. Members in plans that are at least 90 percent funded for
two consecutive years are given 2.5 percent increases. Members in plans that have not
exceeded 90 percent funded, or have fallen below 80 percent, are given 1.0 percent
increases.
The benefit provisions stated in the following paragraphs of this section are current
provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are
entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at
the time they last terminated their public service.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
59
1. GERF Benefits
Benefits are based on a member’s highest average salary for any five successive years
of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods
are used to compute benefits for the PERA’s Coordinated and Basic Plan members.
The retiring member receives the higher of a step-rate benefit accrual formula (Method
1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for
a Basic Plan member is 2.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years of
service and 2.7 percent for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a
Coordinated Plan member is 1.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years
and 1.7 percent for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is
2.7 percent of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7 percent for Coordinated
Plan members for each year of service. For members hired prior to July 1, 1989, a full
annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90 and normal retirement
age is 65. For members hired on or after July 1, 1989, normal retirement age is the
age for unreduced Social Security benefits capped at 66.
2. PEPFF Benefits
Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2010, but before July 1, 2014,
vest on a prorated basis from 50 percent after five years up to 100 percent after 10
years of credited service. Benefits for PEPFF members first hired after June 30, 2014,
vest on a prorated basis from 50 percent after 10 years up to 100 percent after 20
years of credited service. The annuity accrual rate is 3 percent of average salary for
each year of service. For PEPFF members who were first hired prior to July 1, 1989, a
full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal at least 90.
C. CONTRIBUTIONS
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353 sets the rates for employer and employee contributions.
Contribution rates can only be modified by the State Legislature.
1. GERF Contributions
Coordinated Plan members were required to contribute 6.5 percent of their annual
covered salary in calendar year 2017. The City was required to contribute 7.5 percent
for Coordinated Plan members in calendar year 2017. The City’s contributions to the
GERF for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $1,317,596. The City’s
contributions were equal to the required contributions as set by state statute.
2. PEPFF Contributions
Plan members were required to contribute 10.8 percent of their annual covered salary
in calendar year 2017. The City was required to contribute 16.2 percent of pay for
PEPFF members in calendar year 2017. The City’s regular contributions to the PEPFF
for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $1,335,917. The City’s contributions were
equal to the required contributions as set by state statute.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
60
D. PENSION COSTS
1. GERF Pension Costs
At December 31, 2017, the City reported a liability of $17,519,302 for its
proportionate share of the GERF’s net pension liability. The City’s net pension liability
reflected a reduction due to the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $6 million to the
fund in 2017. The State of Minnesota is considered a non-employer contribution
entity and the State’s contribution meets the definition of a special funding situation.
The State of Minnesota’s proportionate share of the net pension liability associated
with the City totaled $220,299. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30,
2017, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was
determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportion of the net
pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by the PERA during
the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2017, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the
PERA’s participating employers. At June 30, 2017, the City’s proportionate share was
.2772 percent, which was an increase of .0116 percent from its proportion measured
as of June 30, 2016.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the City recognized pension expense of
$2,448,671 for its proportionate share of the GERF’s pension expense. In addition, the
City recognized an additional $6,363 as pension expense (and grant revenue) for its
proportionate share of the State of Minnesota’s contribution of $6 million to the General
Employees Fund.
At December 31, 2017, the City reported its proportionate share of the GERF’s
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources, and its contributions
subsequent to the measurement date, related to pensions from the following sources:
Deferred Deferred
Outflows Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience 577,383$ 1,082,224$
Changes in actuarial assumptions 2,786,864 1,756,312
Differences between projected and actual investment earnings – 9,507
Changes in proportion 699,334 404,102
Contributions paid to the PERA subsequent to the measurement
date 653,093 –
Total 4,716,674$ 3,252,145$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
61
$653,093 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from
city contributions subsequent to the measurement date that will be recognized as a
reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2018. Other
amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions
will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Pension
Year Ended Expense
December 31, Amount
2018 560,627$
2019 1,126,812$
2020 (132,345)$
2021 (743,658)$
2. PEPFF Pension Costs
At December 31, 2017, the City reported a liability of $10,949,465 for its proportionate
share of the PEPFF’s net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as
of June 30, 2017, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability
was determined by an actuarial valuation as of that date. The City’s proportion of the
net pension liability was based on the City’s contributions received by the PERA during
the measurement period for employer payroll paid dates from July 1, 2016 through
June 30, 2017, relative to the total employer contributions received from all of the
PERA’s participating employers. At June 30, 2017, the City’s proportion was
.811 percent, which was an increase of .012 percent from its proportion measured as
of June 30, 2016.
For the year ended December 31, 2017, the City recognized pension expense of
$2,707,714 for its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s pension expense. The City also
recognized $72,990 for the year ended December 31, 2017, as pension expense (and
grant revenue) for its proportionate share of the state of Minnesota’s on-behalf
contributions to the PEPFF. Legislation passed in 2013 required the state of Minnesota
to begin contributing $9 million to the PEPFF each year, starting in fiscal year 2014.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
62
At December 31, 2017, the City reported its proportionate share of the PEPFF’s
deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions
from the following sources:
Deferred Deferred
Outflows Inflows
of Resources of Resources
Differences between expected and actual economic experience 252,036$ 2,892,748$
Changes in actuarial assumptions 14,117,532 15,545,523
Differences between projected and actual investment earnings 104,677 –
Changes in proportion 401,315 82,200
Contributions paid to the PERA subsequent to the measurement
date 679,535 –
Total 15,555,095$ 18,520,471$
$679,535 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to pensions resulting from
city contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a
reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended December 31, 2018. Other
amounts reported as deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pensions
will be recognized in pension expense as follows:
Pension
Year Ended Expense
December 31, Amount
2018 188,619$
2019 188,628$
2020 (210,789)$
2021 (832,937)$
2022 (2,978,432)$
E. ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
The total pension liability in the June 30, 2017 actuarial valuation was determined using
the following actuarial assumptions:
Inflation 2.50% per year
Active member payroll growth 3.25% per year
Investment rate of return 7.50%
Salary increases were based on a service-related table. Mortality rates for active members,
retirees, survivors, and disabilitants were based on RP 2014 tables for all plans for males
or females, as appropriate, with slight adjustments to fit PERA’s experience. Cost of living
benefit increases for retirees are assumed to be 1.0 percent per year for GERF through
2044 and PEPFF through 2064 and then 2.5 percent thereafter for both plans.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
63
Actuarial assumptions used in the June 30, 2017 valuation were based on the results of
actuarial experience studies. The most recent four-year experience study in the GERF was
completed in 2015. The most recent five-year experience study for PEPFF was completed
in 2016.
The following changes in actuarial assumptions occurred in 2017:
GERF
The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) loads were changed from 0.8 percent for
active members and 60 percent for vested and non-vested deferred members. The
revised CSA loads are now 0.0 percent for active member liability, 15.0 percent for
vested deferred member liability and 3.0 percent for non-vested deferred member
liability.
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0
percent per year for all years to 1.0 percent per year through 2044 and 2.5
percent per year thereafter.
PEPFF
Assumed salary increases were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2016
experience study. The net effect is proposed rates that average 0.34 percent lower
than the previous rates.
Assumed rates of retirement were changed, resulting in fewer retirements.
The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) load was 30 percent for vested and non-
vested deferred members. The CSA has been changed to 33 percent for vested
members and 2.0 percent for non-vested members.
The base mortality table for healthy annuitants was changed from the RP-2000
fully generational table to the RP-2014 fully generational table (with a base year of
2006), with male rates adjusted by a factor of 0.96. The mortality improvement
scale was changed from Scale AA to Scale MP-2016. The base mortality table for
disabled annuitants was changed from the RP-2000 disabled mortality table to the
mortality tables assumed for healthy retirees.
Assumed termination rates were decreased to 3.0 percent for the first three years
of service. Rates beyond the select period of three years were adjusted, resulting
in more expected terminations overall.
Assumed percentage of married female members was decreased from 65 percent
to 60 percent.
Assumed age difference was changed from separate assumptions for male
members (wives assumed to be three years younger) and female members
(husbands assumed to be four years older) to the assumption that males are
two years older than females.
The assumed percentage of female members electing Joint and Survivor annuities
was increased.
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent
for all years to 1.0 percent per year through 2064 and 2.5 percent thereafter.
The single discount rate changed from 5.6 percent to 7.5 percent.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
64
The State Board of Investment, which manages the investments of the PERA, prepares an
analysis of the reasonableness of the long-term expected rate of return on a regular basis
using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future rates of
return are developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce
an expected long-term rate of return by weighting the expected future rates of return by the
target asset allocation percentages. The target allocation and best estimates of geometric
real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table:
Asset Class
Target
Allocation
Long-Term Expected
Real Rate of Return
Domestic stocks 39% 5.10%
International
stocks
19% 5.30%
Bonds 20% .75%
Alternative assets 20% 5.90%
Cash 2% 0.0%
F. DISCOUNT RATE
The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability in 2017 was 7.5 percent. The
projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that contributions from
Plan members and employers will be made at rates set in Minnesota Statutes. Based on those
assumptions, the fiduciary net position of the GERF and PEPFF was projected to be available
to make all projected future benefit payments of current Plan members. Therefore, the long-
term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected
benefit payments to determine the total pension liability.
G. PENSION LIABILITY SENSITIVITY
The following presents the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability for all plans it
participates in, calculated using the discount rate disclosed in the preceding paragraph, as well
as what the City’s proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated
using a discount rate 1.0 percentage point lower or 1.0 percentage point higher than the current
discount rate:
1% Decrease in 1% Increase in
Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate
(6.5%) (7.5%) (8.5%)
The City’s proportionate share of the
GERF net pension liability 27,173,740$ 17,519,302$ 9,615,392$
1% Decrease in 1% Increase in
Discount Rate Discount Rate Discount Rate
(6.5%) (7.5%) (8.5%)
The City’s proportionate share of the
PEPFF net pension liability 20,621,037$ 10,949,465$ 2,965,048$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
65
H. PENSION PLAN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION
Detailed information about each pension plan’s fiduciary net position is available in a
separately-issued PERA financial report that includes financial statements and required
supplementary information. That report may be obtained on the PERA website at
www.mnpera.org.
I. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN (DCP)
Board members of the City are covered by the DCP, a multiple-employer deferred
compensation plan administered by PERA. The DCP is a tax qualified plan under Section
401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and all contributions by or on behalf of employees are tax
deferred until time of withdrawal.
Plan benefits depend solely on amounts contributed to the plan plus investment earnings, less
administrative expenses. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 353D.03, specifies plan provisions,
including the employee and employer contribution rates for those qualified personnel who elect
to participate. An eligible elected official who decides to participate contributes 5.0 percent of
salary which is matched by the elected official’s employer. For ambulance service personnel,
employer contributions are determined by the employer, and for salaried employees must be a
fixed percentage of salary. Employer contributions for volunteer personnel may be a unit value
for each call or period of alert duty. Employees who are paid for their services may elect to
make member contributions in an amount not to exceed the employer share. Employer and
employee contributions are combined and used to purchase shares in one or more of the seven
accounts of the Minnesota Supplemental Investment Fund. For administering the plan, PERA
receives 2.0 percent of employer contributions and twenty-five hundredths of 1.0 percent
(.0025) of the assets in each member’s account annually.
Total contributions made by the City during fiscal year 2017 were:
Employee Employer Employee Employer Required Rate
1,783$ 1,783$ 5% 5% 5%
Contribution Amount Percentage of Covered Payroll
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
66
Note 7 MULTIPLE-EMPLOYER DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLAN
City employees belonging to International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) are participants
in a multiple-employer defined benefit pension plan Central Pension Fund of the International
Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers (CRF) administered by the Board of
Trustees of the Central Pension Fund. The plan is a cost-sharing pension plan that is not a state
or local governmental pension plan, is used to provide defined benefit pensions both to
employers that are not state or local governmental employers, and has no predominant state or
local government employer. The Plan issues a publicly available financial report located on their
website at www.cpfiuoe.org.
The City has 52 employees who are covered by the pension plan. The plan provides benefits
such as monthly retirement income, special and early retirement benefits, post-retirement
surviving spouse benefits, and disability benefits. The CPF is a supplemental Pension Fund
authorized by Minnesota Statutes, 356.24, subdivision 1(9). The CPF Plan of Benefits and the
Agreement and Declaration of Trust will serve as the governing documents.
The City’s contributions to the plan are pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement with the
IUOE which expires December 31, 2019. The required contribution rate is $0.75 per hour, which
is applied to all compensated hours, and capped at $5,000 per year. Total employer contributions
for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $86,539. With regard to withdrawal from the pension
plan, the parties agree that the amount that would otherwise be paid in salary or wages will be
contributed instead to the CPF as pre-tax employer contributions.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
67
Note 8 OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN
A. PLAN DESCRIPTION
The City provides post-employment insurance benefits to certain eligible employees
through City’s Other Post-Employment Benefits Plan, a single-employer defined benefit
plan administered by the City. All post-employment benefits are based on contractual
agreements with employee groups. These contractual agreements do not include any
specific contribution or funding requirements. The plan does not issue a publically available
financial report. These benefits are summarized as follows:
Post-Employment Insurance Benefits – All retirees of the City have the option
under state law to continue their medical insurance coverage through the City from
the time of retirement until the employee reaches the age of eligibility for Medicare.
For members of all employee groups, the retiree must pay the full premium to
continue coverage for medical and dental insurance.
The City is legally required to include any retirees for whom it provides health
insurance coverage in the same insurance pool as its active employees, whether
the premiums are paid by the City or the retiree. Consequently, participating
retirees are considered to receive a secondary benefit known as an “implicit rate
subsidy.” This benefit relates to the assumption that the retiree is receiving a more
favorable premium rate than they would otherwise be able to obtain if purchasing
insurance on their own, due to being included in the same pool with the City’s
younger and statistically healthier active employees.
B. FUNDING POLICY
The required contribution is based on projected pay-as-you-go financing requirements,
with additional amounts to pre-fund benefits as determined annually by the City. Historically
the City has chosen pay-as-you-go financing for OPEB, generally this liability is liquidated
by all funds that employ full-time employees on a pro-rata basis.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
68
C. ANNUAL OPEB COST AND NET OPEB OBLIGATION
The City’s annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on annual required
contributions (ARC) of the City, an amount determined on an actuarially determined basis
in accordance with the parameters of codification Statement Nos. 43 and 45. The ARC
represents a level funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal
costs each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities (or funding excess) over a
period not to exceed 30 years. The following table shows the components of the City’s
annual OPEB cost for the year, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the
changes in the City’s net OPEB obligation to the plan:
Annual required contribution 284,564$
Interest on net OPEB obligation 96,944
Adjustment to annual required contribution (84,099)
Annual OPEB cost (expense) 297,409
Contributions made (118,314)
Increase in net OPEB obligation 179,095
Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year 2,154,288
Net OPEB obligation - end of year 2,333,383$
The City’s annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan,
and the net OPEB obligation for the past three years are as follows:
Percentage of
Fiscal Annual Employer Annual OPEB Net OPEB
Year Ended OPEB Cost Contribution Cost Contributed Obligation
December 31, 2015 329,182$ 119,780$ 36.4% 1,929,174$
December 31, 2016 287,036 61,922 21.6% 2,154,288
December 31, 2017 297,409 118,314 39.8% 2,333,383
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
69
D. FUNDED STATUS AND FUNDING PROGRESS
As of January 1, 2016, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the plan was zero percent
funded. The actuarial accrued liability for benefits was $2,546,522, and the actuarial value
of assets was $0, resulting in an unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) of $2,546,522.
The covered payroll (annual payroll of active employees covered by the plan) was
$21,590,000, and the ratio of the UAAL to the covered payroll was 11.8 percent.
Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts
and assumptions about the probability occurrence of events far into the future. Examples
include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend.
Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and ARCs of the employer
are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared with past expectations and
new estimates are made about the future. The Schedule of Funding Progress immediately
following the notes to the basic financial statements presents multi-year trend information
about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time
relative to the actuarial accrued liabilities for benefits.
E. ACTUARIAL METHODS AND ASSUMPTIONS
Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the substantive plan
(the plan as understood by the employer and the plan members) and include the types of
benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of
benefit costs between the employer and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods
and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce the effects of short-
term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent
with the long-term perspective of the calculations.
In the January 1, 2016 actuarial valuation, the projected unit credit actuarial cost method
was used. The actuarial assumptions included: a 4.5 percent investment rate of return (net
of administrative expenses) based on the City’s own investments; a payroll growth rate of
3.5 percent, and an annual healthcare cost trend rate of 9.0 percent initially, reduced by
decrements to an ultimate rate of 5.0 percent after twelve years. The UAAL is being
amortized as a level percentage of payroll. The remaining amortization period at January
1, 2016 was 30 years on an “open” basis.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
70
Note 9 INTERFUND RECEIVABLES, PAYABLES, AND TRANSFERS
The composition of due from other funds and due to other funds account balances as of
December 31, 2017, is as follows:
Payable Fund Amount
Construction Nonmajor - Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety 68,351$
Receivable Fund
The City’s interfund receivable and payable eliminates what would have been a negative cash
balance.
Debt Nonmajor
General Service Construction Golf Course Arena Enterprise Total
Transfer out:
General Fund -$ -$ 1,880,405$ -$ -$ -$ 1,880,405$
Construction Fund - 3,000,000 - - 83,887 29,071 3,112,958
Nonmajor Governmental - - - - - 63,900 63,900
Utilities Fund - - 100,000 - - - 100,000
Liquor Fund 50,000 - 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 750,000
50,000$ 3,000,000$ 2,080,405$ 200,000$ 283,887$ 292,971$ 5,907,263$
Transfer In:
Interfund transfers allow the City to allocate financial resources to the funds that receive benefit
from services provided by another fund. Some of the City’s interfund transfers fall under that
category. Non-routine transfers include the following:
1. The liquor fund transferred $50,000, $200,000, $200,000, $100,000 and $100,000 to the
general, golf course, arena, art center, and centennial lakes funds, respectively, to
subsidize operations.
2. The construction fund transferred $83,887 and $29,071 to the arena and edinborough
park, respectively, to subsidize capital improvements to those facilities.
3. The environmental efficiency fund transferred $63,900 to the edinborough fund to
subsidize capital improvements.
4. The utilities fund and liquor fund transferred $100,000 each to the construction fund to
fund the capital improvement program, as planned in the 2017 budget.
5. The general fund transferred $1,880,405 of the 2016 unassigned fund balance to the
construction fund to subsidize the capital improvement program.
6. The construction fund transferred $3,000,000 of PIR assessment revenue to the debt
service fund for related debt payments.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
71
Note 10 TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
The Housing Redevelopment Authority and City of Edina are the administering authorities for the
following Tax Increment Districts:
District number 1208 (Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District) is an economic development
district established in 2012 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2022.
District number 1211 (Pentagon Park Increment Financing District) is an economic development
district established in 2014 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2043.
District number 1212 (Grandview 2 Increment Financing District) is an economic development
district established in 2016 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2045.
District number 1214 (66 West Increment Financing District) is an economic development district
established in 2016 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2045.
District number 1215 (50th and France 2) is an economic development district established in 2017
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2045.
The following table reflects values as of December 31, 2017:
TIF #1208 TIF #1211 TIF #1212 TIF #1214 TIF #1215 Total
Original tax capacity 7,289,563$ 691,608$ 44,026$ 32,456$ 15,148$ 8,072,801$
Current tax capacity 12,825,962 854,460 44,026 32,456 15,148 13,772,052
Fiscal Disparities 1,121,666 52,458 - - - 1,174,124
Tax capacity change 4,414,733 110,394 - - - 4,525,127
Captured tax capacity value:
Retained captured tax capacity 4,414,733$ 110,394$ -$ -$ -$ 4,525,127$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
72
Note 11 CONTINGENCIES
A. RISK MANAGEMENT
The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to and
destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters.
Worker’s compensation insurance was provided through the League of Minnesota Cities
Insurance Trust. There is no deductible. The City has an annual deposit premium that is
subject to adjustment based on the actual audited payroll.
A package policy; including property, general liability, and automobile coverage, is
provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. Under this policy, the
City pays an annual premium and had a $50,000 per occurrence deductible and is
subject to an annual aggregate deductible of $150,000, with a $1,000,000 per occurrence
maximum.
Liquor liability coverage is provided through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance
Trust. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage and has a $1,000,000 annual
maximum.
Settlement claims have not exceeded insurance coverage for each of the past three
years. There were no significant decreases in insurance coverage during 2017.
B. LITIGATION
The City attorney has indicated that existing and pending lawsuits, claims and other
actions in which the City is a defendant are either covered by insurance; of an immaterial
amount; or, in the judgment of the City attorney, remotely recoverable by plaintiffs.
C. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS
The City receives financial assistance from federal and state governmental agencies in
the form of grants. The disbursement of funds received under these programs generally
requires compliance with the terms and conditions specified in the grant agreements and
is subject to audit by the grantor agencies. Any disallowed claims resulting from such
audits could become a liability of the applicable fund. However, in the opinion of
management, any such disallowed claims will not have a material effect on any of the
financial statements of the individual fund types included herein or on the overall financial
position of the City at December 31, 2017.
D. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS
The City’s tax increment districts are subject to review by the State of Minnesota Office of
the State Auditor (OSA). Any disallowed claims or misuse of tax increments could
become a liability of the applicable fund. Management is not aware of any instances of
noncompliance which would have a material effect on the financial statements.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
73
Note 12 CONDUIT DEBT OBLIGATION
As of December 31, 2017, the City of Edina had four series of Housing and Health Care Revenue
Bonds, with an aggregate principal amount payable of $28,690,000. The bonds are payable
solely from revenues of the respective organizations and do not constitute an indebtedness of the
City, and are not a charge against its general credit or taxing power. Accordingly, the bonds are
not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements.
Note 13 JOINT VENTURE
The City is a participant with the City of Bloomington, the City of Eden Prairie and the
Metropolitan Airport Commission in a joint venture to construct and operate a facility to be used
for the training of law enforcement officers and firefighters. The South Metro Public Safety
Training Facility Association (PSTF) is governed by a Board consisting of one representative from
each Member. On dissolution of the Association, the Facility shall revert to the City of Edina, and
all remaining assets shall be divided among the members based on the Cost Sharing Formula. In
accordance with the joint venture agreement, each member of the association will share in the
cost of the construction and operation based on the Cost Sharing Formula. The City’s equity
interest in the capital assets of the PSTF was $1,770,353. Complete financial statements for
PSTF can be obtained from the City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424.
Note 14 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The City pays an annual membership fee to the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility as
part of the joint venture agreement. The membership fee is paid by the Police and Fire
departments and is based on a Cost Sharing Formula. For the year ended December 31, 2017,
the City paid a total of $59,052 in membership fees to the PSTF.
Note 15 SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On June 5, 2018 the City issued General Obligation bonds, Series 2018A totaling $5,515,000.
These bonds were issued with interest rates ranging from 3.0 to 4.0 percent with a final maturity
of February 1, 2035.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2017
74
Note 16 FUND BALANCES
A. Classifications
At December 31, 2017, a summary of the City’s governmental fund balance classifications
are as follows:
General Fund HRA Fund
Debt Service
Fund
Construction
Fund
Nonmajor
Funds Total
Nonspendable
Prepaid items 13,124$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 13,124$
Restricted
Park dedication 961,133 - - - - 961,133
Tax increments - 11,420,325 - - - 11,420,325
Affordable housing - 2,026,871 - - - 2,026,871
Debt service - - 17,000,806 - - 17,000,806
Pedestrian and cyclist improvements - - - - 23,765 23,765
Energy efficiency projects - - - - 78,702 78,702
Forfeitures - - - - 498,362 498,362
Grant funds - - - - 85,597 85,597
Arts and culture - - - - 20,781 20,781
Donations - - - - 130,933 130,933
Conservation and sustainability initiatives - - - - 246,922 246,922
Total Restricted 961,133 13,447,196 17,000,806 - 1,085,062 32,494,197
Assigned
Compensated absences 1,670,090 - - - - 1,670,090
Race and equity 68,989 - - - - 68,989
Construction commitments - - - 258,875 - 258,875
Special projects - - - 1,849,513 - 1,849,513
Equipment - - - 3,877,575 - 3,877,575
PIR - - - 3,015,909 - 3,015,909
Construction - - - 6,708,749 - 6,708,749
Total Assigned 1,739,079 - - 15,710,621 - 17,449,700
Unassigned 15,656,518 - - - - 15,656,518
Total Fund Balance 18,369,854$ 13,447,196$ 17,000,806$ 15,710,621$ 1,085,062$ 65,613,539$
B. Unassigned Fund Balance Policy
The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for
unassigned fund balance for the general fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned
general fund balance of 42%-47% of the subsequent year’s budgeted property tax revenue.
As of December 31, 2017, the City has $15,656,518 of unassigned fund balance in the
general fund, or 54.9% of 2018 budgeted property tax revenue. This amount is $2,264,772
above the goal range identified in the policy.
C. Deficit Fund Equity
The following funds had deficit fund balance/net position at December 31, 2017:
Nonmajor Proprietary Funds:
Art Center (113,135)$
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Revenues:
Taxes:
General property taxes 26,860,319$ 26,860,319$ 26,783,198$ (77,121)$
Franchise taxes 790,000 790,000 889,872 99,872
Lodging tax 20,000 20,000 21,006 1,006
Total taxes 27,670,319 27,670,319 27,694,076 23,757
Licenses and permits: 4,192,660 4,192,660 5,324,710 1,132,050
Intergovernmental:
Federal: 56,000 56,000 56,730 730
State:
Municipal state aid 195,000 195,000 195,000 -
Other 130,000 130,000 165,169 35,169
State aid - police 320,000 320,000 419,165 99,165
State aid - fire 375,573 375,573 428,565 52,992
Health programs 118,977 118,977 118,977 -
Total intergovernmental 1,195,550 1,195,550 1,383,606 188,056
Charges for services:
Administration - - 23,089 23,089
Communications & Technology 132,966 132,966 102,821 (30,145)
Finance 510,936 510,936 484,469 (26,467)
Public Works 170,000 170,000 42,463 (127,537)
Engineering 225,400 225,400 293,414 68,014
Police 321,706 321,706 644,516 322,810
Fire 2,270,160 2,270,160 2,465,678 195,518
Parks & Recreation 281,505 281,505 599,741 318,236
Community Development 105,300 105,300 73,228 (32,072)
Total charges for services 4,017,973 4,017,973 4,729,419 711,446
Fines and forfeits 975,000 975,000 1,064,271 89,271
Miscellaneous:
Investment income 120,000 120,000 171,094 51,094
Rental of property 470,700 470,700 459,099 (11,601)
Parkland dedication - - 33,460 33,460
Other 8,100 8,100 97,596 89,496
Total miscellaneous 598,800 598,800 761,249 162,449
Total revenues 38,650,302 38,650,302 40,957,331 2,307,029
Budgeted Amounts
75
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Expenditures:
Current:
General government:
Administration:
Personal services 892,228$ 892,228$ 941,398$ 49,170$
Contractual services 752,135 752,135 672,052 (80,083)
Commodities 91,100 91,100 36,429 (54,671)
Central services 104,041 104,041 102,859 (1,182)
Total administration 1,839,504 1,839,504 1,752,738 (86,766)
Communications & technology:
Personal services 706,856 706,856 741,426 34,570
Contractual services 259,700 259,700 232,318 (27,382)
Commodities 85,500 85,500 49,081 (36,419)
Central services 152,461 152,461 148,304 (4,157)
Total communications & technology 1,204,517 1,204,517 1,171,129 (33,388)
Human Resources:
Personal services 744,076 744,076 752,130 8,054
Contractual services 37,200 37,200 27,003 (10,197)
Commodities 2,500 2,500 1,888 (612)
Central services 28,979 28,979 27,401 (1,578)
Total human resources 812,755 812,755 808,422 (4,333)
Finance:
Personal services 546,638 546,638 562,736 16,098
Contractual services 267,100 267,100 269,444 2,344
Commodities 14,100 14,100 12,572 (1,528)
Central services 52,907 52,907 51,776 (1,131)
Total finance 880,745 880,745 896,528 15,783
Community development:
Personal services 1,330,210 1,330,210 1,330,551 341
Contractual services 343,200 343,200 238,573 (104,627)
Commodities 8,200 8,200 15,229 7,029
Central services 128,367 128,367 124,983 (3,384)
Total community development 1,809,977 1,809,977 1,709,336 (100,641)
Total general government 6,547,498 6,547,498 6,338,153 (209,345)
Public safety:
Police:
Personal services 8,985,956 8,985,956 8,963,122 (22,834)
Contractual services 1,081,870 1,081,870 1,124,893 43,023
Commodities 95,715 95,715 75,957 (19,758)
Central services 1,274,827 1,274,827 1,227,729 (47,098)
Total police 11,438,368 11,438,368 11,391,701 (46,667)
Fire:
Personal services 6,321,685 6,321,685 6,303,397 (18,288)
Contractual services 583,750 583,750 557,776 (25,974)
Commodities 250,100 250,100 239,183 (10,917)
Central services 591,271 591,271 561,001 (30,270)
Total fire 7,746,806 7,746,806 7,661,357 (85,449)
Total public safety 19,185,174 19,185,174 19,053,058 (132,116)
Budgeted Amounts
76
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - GENERAL FUND (CONTINUED)
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final Budget
Budgeted Amounts
Public works:
Public works:
Personal services 4,688,732$ 4,688,732$ 4,622,704$ (66,028)$
Contractual services 1,709,600 1,709,600 1,571,369 (138,231)
Commodities 1,679,150 1,679,150 1,652,258 (26,892)
Central services 1,650,472 1,650,472 1,529,579 (120,893)
Total public works 9,727,954 9,727,954 9,375,910 (352,044)
Engineering:
Personal services 1,370,923 1,370,923 1,269,697 (101,226)
Contractual services 116,500 116,500 79,705 (36,795)
Commodities 25,000 25,000 30,231 5,231
Central services 129,747 129,747 121,721 (8,026)
Total engineering 1,642,170 1,642,170 1,501,354 (140,816)
Total public works 11,370,124 11,370,124 10,877,264 (492,860)
Parks:
Parks & recreation:
Personal services 997,720 997,720 1,002,090 4,370
Contractual services 435,522 435,522 506,885 71,363
Commodities 86,800 86,800 96,549 9,749
Central services 77,464 77,464 75,384 (2,080)
Total parks & recreation 1,597,506 1,597,506 1,680,908 83,402
Total parks 1,597,506 1,597,506 1,680,908 83,402
Total expenditures 38,700,302 38,700,302 37,949,383 (750,919)
Revenues over (under) expenditures (50,000) (50,000) 3,007,948 3,057,948
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfer from other funds 50,000 50,000 50,000 -
Transfer to other funds - (1,880,405) (1,880,405) -
Total financing sources (uses) 50,000 (1,830,405) (1,830,405) -
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance -$ (1,880,405)$ 1,177,543 3,057,948$
Fund balance - January 1 17,192,311
Fund balance - December 31 18,369,854$
77
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
BUDGETARY COMPARISON SCHEDULE - HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HRA) FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,414$ 414$
Tax increment collections 2,500,000 2,500,000 3,422,898 922,898
Intergovernmental - - 3,046 3,046
Investment income 62,000 62,000 143,481 81,481
Charges for services 7,275,000 7,275,000 42,400 (7,232,600)
Total revenues 9,932,000 9,932,000 3,707,239 (6,224,761)
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services 129,068 129,068 135,740 6,672
Contractual services 679,865 679,865 337,062 (342,803)
Commodities 1,500 1,500 2,121 621
Capital outlay 10,150,000 10,150,000 1,584,867 (8,565,133)
Total expenditures 10,960,433 10,960,433 2,059,790 (8,900,643)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (1,028,433)$ (1,028,433)$ 1,647,449 2,675,882$
Fund balance - January 1 11,799,747
Fund balance - December 31 13,447,196$
Budgeted Amounts
78
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLAN
SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Unfunded Unfunded
Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Actuarial Liability as a
Valuation Accrued Value of Accrued Funded Covered Percentage of
Date Liability Plan Assets Liability Ratio Payroll Payroll
January 1, 2012 2,959,876$ -$ 2,959,876$ 0.0% 18,220,189$ 16.2%
January 1, 2014 3,026,848$ -$ 3,026,848$ 0.0% 20,305,179$ 14.9%
January 1, 2016 2,546,522$ -$ 2,546,522$ 0.0% 21,590,000$ 11.8%
79
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
12/31/2015 6/30/2015 0.2683% 13,765,652$ -$ 13,765,652$ 15,508,173$ 88.76% 78.20%
12/31/2016 6/30/2016 0.2656% 21,349,748 278,868 21,628,616 16,481,973 131.23% 68.91%
12/31/2017 6/30/2017 0.2772% 17,519,302 220,299 17,739,601 17,858,560 99.33% 75.90%
12/31/2015 1,248,845$ 1,248,845$ -$ 16,651,267$ 7.50%
12/31/2016 1,265,817 1,265,817 - 16,877,560 7.50%
12/31/2017 1,317,596 1,317,596 - 17,567,947 7.50%
Schedule of City's and Non-Employer Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
Covered
Payroll
Contributions as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll
Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to present 10-year trend information.
Additional years will be added as they become available.
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
PERA Fiscal
Year End Date
(Measurement
Date)
City's Covered
Payroll
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
Statutorily
Required
Contributions
Contribution
Deficiency
(Excess)
City's
Proportion of
the Net
Pension
Liability
City's
Proportionate
Share of the
Net Pension
Liability
Contributions
in Relation to
the Statutorily
Required
Contributions
Schedule of City Contributions
State's
Proportionate
Share of the
Net Pension
Liability
Associated
with the City
City's Proportionate Share
of the Net Pension Liability
and the State's
Proportionate Share of the
Net Pension Liability
Associated with the City
City's
Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability
as a Percentage
of Covered
Payroll
Plan Fiduciary
Net Position
as a
Percentage of
the total
Pension
Liability
80
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES POLICE AND FIRE FUND
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
12/31/2015 6/30/2015 0.8070% 9,169,408$ 7,797,803$ 117.59% 86.60%
12/31/2016 6/30/2016 0.7990% 32,065,260 7,699,821 416.44% 63.88%
12/31/2017 6/30/2017 0.8110% 10,949,465 8,322,605 131.56% 85.43%
12/31/2015 1,268,476$ 1,268,476$ -$ 7,830,099$ 16.20%
12/31/2016 1,272,485 1,272,485 - 7,854,846 16.20%
12/31/2017 1,335,917 1,335,917 - 8,246,401 16.20%
Note: The City implemented GASB Statement No. 68 in fiscal 2015 (using a June 30, 2015 measurement date). This schedule is intended to
present 10-year trend information. Additional years will be added as they become available.
Schedule of City Contributions
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
Statutorily
Required
Contributions
Contributions
in Relation to
the Statutorily
Required
Contributions
Contribution
Deficiency
(Excess)
Covered
Payroll
Contributions as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll
Schedule of City's Proportionate Share of Net Pension Liability
City Fiscal
Year End
Date
PERA Fiscal
Year End Date
(Measurement
Date)
City's
Proportion of
the Net
Pension
Liability
City's
Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability
City's Covered
Payroll
City's Proportionate
Share of the Net
Pension Liability as a
Percentage of Covered
Payroll
Plan Fiduciary Net
Position as a
Percentage of the
total Pension Liability
81
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
December 31, 2017
82
Note A LEGAL COMPLIANCE – BUDGETS
The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the preceding
schedules:
1. The City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the fiscal year
commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures
and the means of financing them.
2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments.
3. The budget is legally enacted by the passage of a resolution by the City Council.
4. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year.
5. Budgets for all governmental funds are adopted on a basis consistent with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
6. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by Council-approved
supplemental appropriations and budget transfers.
7. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department in the General Fund
unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year-end.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
December 31, 2017
83
Note B EXCESS OF EXPENDITURES OVER APPROPRIATIONS
The General Fund is legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department
level for the General Fund. The following is a listing of General Fund departments whose
expenditures exceed budget appropriations.
Final Over
Budget Actual Budget
General Fund
General Government
Finance 880,745$ 896,528$ 15,783$
Parks
Parks & recreation 1,597,506 1,680,908 83,402
Excess expenditures in the General Fund finance department are due to an increase in salaries due
to a new position being added in 2017 that was not budgeted for.
Excess expenditures in the General Fund parks and recreation department are due to increased
programming expenses that resulted in additional revenue.
The remaining governmental funds budgets are legally adopted on a basis consistent with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control is
at the fund level for these funds. The following is a listing of funds whose expenditures exceed budget
appropriations.
Final Over
Budget Actual Budget
Debt Service Fund 7,765,961$ 7,855,926$ 89,965$
Construction Fund 7,596,772 8,919,215 1,322,443
PACS Fund 1,005,365 1,083,506 78,141
CAS Fund 157,495 174,606 17,111
Police Fund 140,500 156,703 16,203
CDBG Fund 125,000 131,191 6,191
Excess expenditures in the debt service fund are the result of unbudgeted refunding’s of debt.
Excess expenditures in the construction fund are the result of unbudgeted projects, with expenditures
offset by alternative funding sources such as intergovernmental funding and state aid maintenance.
Excess expenditures in the PACS fund are the result of project costs and consulting services being
higher than anticipated.
Excess expenditures in the CAS fund are the result of energy efficiency capital asset upgrades being
purchased for the arena.
Excess expenditures in the police fund are the result of purchasing new squad car technology.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
December 31, 2017
84
Note C PENSION INFORMATION
General Employees Retirement Fund
2017 Changes
Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) loads were changed from 0.8 percent for active
members and 60 percent for vested and non-vested deferred members. The revised CSA
loads are now 0.0 percent for active member liability, 15.0 percent for vested deferred
member liability and 3.0 percent for non-vested deferred member liability.
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent per
year for all years to 1.0 percent per year through 2044 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter.
2016 Changes
Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent per year
through 2035 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.0 percent per year for all years.
The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9 percent to 7.5 percent. The single
discount rate was changed from 7.9 percent to 7.5 percent.
Other assumptions were changed pursuant to the experience study dated June 30, 2015.
The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25
percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.5 percent for inflation.
2015 Changes
Changes in Plan Provisions:
On January 1, 2015 the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund was merged into the
General Employees Fund, which increased the total pension liability by $1.1 billion and
increased the fiduciary plan net position by $892 million. Upon consolidation, state and
employer contributions were revised.
Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent per year
through 2030 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.0 percent per year through 2035 and
2.5 percent per year thereafter.
Public Employees Police and Fire Fund
2017 Changes
Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
Assumed salary increases were changed as recommended in the June 30, 2016 experience
study. The net effect is proposed rates that average 0.34 percent lower than the previous
rates.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTES TO REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
December 31, 2017
85
Assumed rates of retirement were changed, resulting in fewer retirements.
The Combined Service Annuity (CSA) load was 30 percent for vested and non-vested
deferred members. The CSA has been changed to 33 percent for vested members and 2
percent for non-vested members.
The base mortality table for healthy annuitants was changed from the RP-2000 fully
generational table to the RP-2014 fully generational table (with a base year of 2006), with
male rates adjusted by a factor of 0.96. The mortality improvement scale was changed from
Scale AA to Scale MP-2016. The base mortality table for disabled annuitants was changed
from the RP-2000 disabled mortality table to the mortality tables assumed for healthy retirees.
Assumed termination rates were decreased to 3.0 percent for the first three years of service.
Rates beyond the select period of three years were adjusted, resulting in more expected
terminations overall.
Assumed percentage of married female members was decreased from 65 percent to 60
percent.
Assumed age difference was changed from separate assumptions for male members
(wives assumed to be three years younger) and female members (husbands assumed to
be four years older) to the assumption that males are two years older than females.
The assumed percentage of female members electing Joint and Survivor annuities was
increased.
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent for all
years to 1.0 percent per year through 2064 and 2.5 percent thereafter.
The single discount rate changed from 5.6 percent to 7.5 percent.
2016 Changes
Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent per year
through 2037 and 2.5 percent thereafter to 1.0 percent per year for all future years.
The assumed investment return was changed from 7.9 percent to 7.5 percent. The single
discount rate changed from 7.9 percent to 5.6 percent.
The assumed future salary increases, payroll growth, and inflation were decreased by 0.25
percent to 3.25 percent for payroll growth and 2.5 percent for inflation.
2015 Changes
Changes in Plan Provisions:
The post-retirement benefit increase to be paid after attainment of the 90 percent funding
threshold was changed, from inflation up to 2.5 percent, to a fixed rate of 2.5 percent.
Changes in Actuarial Assumptions:
The assumed post-retirement benefit increase rate was changed from 1.0 percent per year
through 2030 and 2.5 percent per year thereafter to 1.0 percent per year through 2037 and
2.5 percent per year thereafter.
86
This page left blank intentionally.
A Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue
sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes.
The following are nonmajor special revenue funds:
Community Development Block Grant Fund - This fund was established to
account for funds received under Title I of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974.
Police Fund - This fund was established to account for funds received for
specific purposes within the police department, including E-911 and
forfeiture funds.
Braemar Memorial Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing the Braemar golf course
with equipment and amenities that might not otherwise be affordable or viewed
as a necessity to the golf course.
Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund - This fund was established to account for
funds received from gas and electric franchise fees to be used for pedestrian
and cyclist improvements included in future street reconstruction projects.
Arts and Culture Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
donated to the City for the purpose of enhancing public arts and culture related
activities.
Conservation and Sustainability Fund - This fund was established to account for
funds received from gas and electric franchise fees to be used for initiatives
focused on conservation and sustainability.
A Capital Project Fund is used to account for and report financial resources
used for the acquisition of capital assets.
The following is a nonmajor capital project fund:
Environmental Efficiency Fund - This fund was established to account for funds
received through energy cost savings to be reinvested in future energy efficiencies.
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
Special Revenue Funds
Capital Project Funds
87
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING BALANCE SHEET
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
December 31, 2017
Capital
Projects
Community Pedestrian Conservation Total Nonmajor
Development Braemar and Cyclist Arts and and Environmental Governmental
Block Grant Police Memorial Safety Culture Sustainability Efficiency Funds
Assets
Cash and investments -$ 583,634$ 129,821$ -$ 20,729$ 199,453$ 141,759$ 1,075,396$
Accrued interest - - 462 - 52 640 693 1,847
Accounts receivable - - 650 292,289 - 60,394 - 353,333
Due from other governments - 9,338 - - 100 - - 9,438
Total assets -$ 592,972$ 130,933$ 292,289$ 20,881$ 260,487$ 142,452$ 1,440,014$
Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of
Resources, and Fund Balance
Liabilities:
Accounts payable -$ 9,013$ -$ 9,357$ -$ 11,520$ 63,750$ 93,640$
Salaries payable - - - 2,371 - 2,045 - 4,416
Contracts payable - - - 188,445 - - - 188,445
Due to other funds - - - 68,351 - - 68,351
Total liabilities - 9,013 - 268,524 - 13,565 63,750 354,852
Deferred inflows of resources
Unavailable revenue - taxes - - - - 100 - - 100
Fund balance:
Restricted - 583,959 130,933 23,765 20,781 246,922 78,702 1,085,062
Total liabilities, deferred
inflows of resources,
and fund balance -$ 592,972$ 130,933$ 292,289$ 20,881$ 260,487$ 142,452$ 1,440,014$
Special Revenue
88
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES
AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Capital
Projects
Community Pedestrian Conservation Total Nonmajor
Development Braemar and Cyclist Arts and and Environmental Governmental
Block Grant Police Memorial Safety Culture Sustainability Efficiency Funds
Revenues:
General property taxes -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 20,000$
Franchise taxes - - - 1,176,085 - 242,650 - 1,418,735
Intergovernmental 131,191 15,000 - 113,131 - - - 259,322
Fines and forfeitures - 71,715 - - - - - 71,715
Investment income - 21 1,539 - 174 2,145 - 3,879
Other revenues - 112,061 1,050 8,900 2,631 1,988 - 126,630
Total revenues 131,191 198,797 2,589 1,298,116 22,805 246,783 - 1,900,281
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 131,191 - - - - 121,462 - 252,653
Public safety - 149,609 - - - - - 149,609
Public works - - - 231,319 - - - 231,319
Parks - - - - 11,579 - - 11,579
Capital Outlay:
Public safety - 7,094 - - - - - 7,094
Public works - - - 852,187 - - 66,908 919,095
Parks - - 19,739 - - 53,144 - 72,883
Total expenditures 131,191 156,703 19,739 1,083,506 11,579 174,606 66,908 1,644,232
Revenues over (under)
expenditures - 42,094 (17,150) 214,610 11,226 72,177 (66,908) 256,049
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers out - - - - - - (63,900) (63,900)
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance - 42,094 (17,150) 214,610 11,226 72,177 (130,808) 192,149
Fund balance (deficits) -
January 1 - 541,865 148,083 (190,845) 9,555 174,745 209,510 892,913
Fund balance -
December 31 -$ 583,959$ 130,933$ 23,765$ 20,781$ 246,922$ 78,702$ 1,085,062$
Special Revenue
89
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Intergovernmental 125,000$ 125,000$ 131,191$ 6,191$
Expenditures:
Current:
Contractual services 125,000 125,000 131,191 6,191
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance -$ -$ - -$
Fund balance - January 1 -
Fund balance - December 31 -$
Budgeted Amounts
90
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - POLICE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Intergovernmental 36,000$ 36,000$ 15,000$ (21,000)$
Fines and forfeiture - - 71,715 71,715
Investment income 300 300 21 (279)
Other revenues 134,061 134,061 112,061 (22,000)
Total revenues 170,361 170,361 198,797 28,436
Expenditures:
Current:
Contractual services 98,000 98,000 44,122 (53,878)
Commodities 15,000 15,000 105,487 90,487
Capital outlay 27,500 27,500 7,094 (20,406)
Total expenditures 140,500 140,500 156,703 16,203
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 29,861$ 29,861$ 42,094 12,233$
Fund balance - January 1 541,865
Fund balance - December 31 583,959$
Budgeted Amounts
91
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - BRAEMAR MEMORIAL
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Investment income 200$ 200$ 1,539$ 1,339$
Donations 5,000 5,000 1,050 (3,950)
Total revenues 5,200 5,200 2,589 (2,611)
Expenditures:
Capital outlay 79,000 79,000 19,739 (59,261)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (73,800)$ (73,800)$ (17,150) 56,650$
Fund balance - January 1 148,083
Fund balance - December 31 130,933$
Budgeted Amounts
92
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Franchise taxes 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ 1,176,085$ (23,915)$
Intergovernmental - - 113,131 113,131
Other revenues - - 8,900 8,900
Total revenues 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,298,116 98,116
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services 116,531 116,531 119,608 3,077
Contractual services 20,000 20,000 108,161 88,161
Commodities 20,000 20,000 2,816 (17,184)
Central services 734 734 734 -
Capital outlay 848,100 848,100 852,187 4,087
Total expenditures 1,005,365 1,005,365 1,083,506 78,141
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 194,635$ 194,635$ 214,610 19,975$
Fund balance (deficits) - January 1 (190,845)
Fund balance - December 31 23,765$
Budgeted Amounts
93
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - ARTS AND CULTURE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ -$
Investment income - - 174 174
Other revenues 5,350 5,350 2,631 (2,719)
Total revenues 25,350 25,350 22,805 (2,545)
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services - - 22 22
Contractual services 20,425 20,425 10,825 (9,600)
Commodities 2,025 2,025 732 (1,293)
Total expenditures 22,450 22,450 11,579 (10,871)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 2,900$ 2,900$ 11,226 8,326$
Fund balance - January 1 9,555
Fund balance - December 31 20,781$
Budgeted Amounts
94
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SPECIAL REVENUE FUND - CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
Franchise taxes 250,000$ 250,000$ 242,650$ (7,350)$
Investment income - - 2,145 2,145
Other revenues - - 1,988 1,988
Total revenues 250,000 250,000 246,783 (3,217)
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services 106,761 106,761 102,941 (3,820)
Contractual services 35,000 35,000 17,531 (17,469)
Commodities 15,000 15,000 256 (14,744)
Central services 734 734 734 -
Capital outlay - - 53,144 53,144
Total expenditures 157,495 157,495 174,606 17,111
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 92,505$ 92,505$ 72,177 (20,328)$
Fund balance - January 1 174,745
Fund balance - December 31 246,922$
Budgeted Amounts
95
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Expenditures:
Capital outlay 67,900 67,900 66,908 (992)
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers out - - (63,900) (63,900)
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (67,900)$ (67,900)$ (130,808) (62,908)$
Fund balance - January 1 209,510
Fund balance - December 31 78,702$
Budgeted Amounts
96
Debt Service Fund - This fund was established to account for the payment of
principal and interest on the General Obligation, Permanent Improvement
Revolving, Public Project Revenue, and Edina Emerald Energy Program Bonds.
Construction Fund - This fund was established to account for various special
assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. This fund also provides
financing for capital improvements as designated in the City's capital
improvement budget.
MAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
97
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GOVERNMENTAL FUND - DEBT SERVICE
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 4,595,500$ 4,595,500$ 4,560,803$ (34,697)$
Special assessments - - 207,504 207,504
Investment income 10,000 10,000 19,925 9,925
Total revenues 4,605,500 4,605,500 4,788,232 182,732
Expenditures:
Debt Service 7,765,961 7,765,961 7,855,926 89,965
Revenues over (under) expenditures (3,160,461) (3,160,461) (3,067,694) 92,767
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 2,850,783 2,850,783 3,000,000 149,217
Bonds issued - - 107,886 107,886
Refunding bonds issued - - 8,955,000 8,955,000
Refunded bonds paid from escrow (3,785,000) (3,785,000) (3,785,000) -
Premium on bonds issued - - 642,105 642,105
Discount on bonds issued - - (38,959) (38,959)
Total other financing
sources (uses) (934,217) (934,217) 8,881,032 9,815,249
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance (4,094,678)$ (4,094,678)$ 5,813,338 9,908,016$
Fund balance - January 1 11,187,468
Fund balance - December 31 17,000,806$
Budgeted Amounts
98
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GOVERNMENTAL FUND - CONSTRUCTION
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Actual Variance with
Original Final Amounts Final budget
Revenues:
General property taxes 2,251,550$ 2,251,550$ 2,237,135$ (14,415)$
Franchise taxes 105,000 105,000 100,277 (4,723)
Special assessments 4,612,026 4,612,026 5,123,262 511,236
License and permits 90,000 90,000 78,512 (11,488)
Intergovernmental 1,375,000 1,375,000 2,041,288 666,288
Charges for services 35,000 35,000 145,354 110,354
Investment income 70,000 70,000 174,069 104,069
Other revenues - - 537,055 537,055
Total revenues 8,538,576 8,538,576 10,436,952 1,898,376
Expenditures:
Current:
Personal services 107,237 107,237 104,861 (2,376)
Contractual services 221,203 221,203 300,210 79,007
Commodities 26,933 26,933 43,101 16,168
Central services 1,968 1,968 1,770 (198)
Capital outlay 7,239,431 7,239,431 8,469,273 1,229,842
Total expenditures 7,596,772 7,596,772 8,919,215 1,322,443
Revenues over (under) expenditures 941,804 941,804 1,517,737 575,933
Other financing sources (uses):
Transfers in 200,000 200,000 2,080,405 1,880,405
Transfers out (2,850,783) (2,850,783) (3,112,958) (262,175)
Sale of capital assets - - 84,388 84,388
Bonds issued 3,108,982 3,108,982 1,887,114 (1,221,868)
Premium on bonds issued - - 156,686 156,686
Discount on bonds issued - - (12,189) (12,189)
Total other financing -
sources (uses) 458,199 458,199 1,083,446 625,247
Net increase (decrease) in fund balance 1,400,003$ 1,400,003$ 2,601,183 1,201,180$
Fund balance - January 1 13,109,438
Fund balance - December 31 15,710,621$
Budgeted Amounts
99
This page left blank intentionally.
100
Enterprise funds account for the financing of self-supporting activities of
governmental units which render services to the general public on a user charge
basis. The following are nonmajor enterprise funds:
Art Center Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the City's Art Center.
Edinborough Park Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to Edinborough
Park.
Centennial Lakes Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to
Centennial Lakes Park.
Sports Dome Fund - This fund accounts for activities related to the
Sports Dome.
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
Enterprise Funds
101
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
December 31, 2017
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and investments 199,908$ 2,244,161$ 794,124$ 596,225$ 3,834,418$
Interest receivable 635 6,745 2,604 1,597 11,581
Accounts receivable - 1,891 91 18,400 20,382
Inventory 8,718 - - - 8,718
Total current assets 209,261 2,252,797 796,819 616,222 3,875,099
Noncurrent assets:
Net capital assets 68,439 1,040,616 215,899 7,998,656 9,323,610
Deferred outflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 95,286 142,930 95,286 47,643 381,145
Total assets and deferred
outflows of resources 372,986 3,436,343 1,108,004 8,662,521 13,579,854
Liabilities:
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 10,563 45,052 10,421 23,946 89,982
Salaries payable 6,398 21,034 15,535 3,072 46,039
Contracts payable - 80,657 - - 80,657
Due to other governments 721 9,667 1,613 6,273 18,274
Unearned revenue 9,215 30 - - 9,245
Compensated absences payable 12,016 14,188 34,650 - 60,854
Total current liabilities 38,913 170,628 62,219 33,291 305,051
Noncurrent liabilities:
Net OPEB obligation 9,558 19,084 16,791 - 45,433
Net pension liability 353,925 530,888 353,925 176,963 1,415,701
Compensated absences payable 18,025 21,281 51,976 - 91,282
Total noncurrent liabilities 381,508 571,253 422,692 176,963 1,552,416
Deferred inflows of resources:
Defined benefit pension plans 65,700 98,550 65,700 32,850 262,800
Total liabilities and deferred
inflows of resources 486,121 840,431 550,611 243,104 2,120,267
Net position:
Net investment in capital assets 68,439 959,959 215,899 7,998,656 9,242,953
Unrestricted (181,574) 1,635,953 341,494 420,761 2,216,634
Total net position (113,135)$ 2,595,912$ 557,393$ 8,419,417$ 11,459,587$
102
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES
AND CHANGES IN FUND NET POSITION
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Operating revenues:
Sales - retail 42,504$ -$ -$ -$ 42,504$
Sales - concessions 652 150,627 22,998 - 174,277
Memberships 14,213 148,235 - - 162,448
Admissions - 716,309 - 21,882 738,191
Building rental - 242,545 86,047 466,904 795,496
Rental of equipment - 12,248 119,994 - 132,242
Greens fees - - 247,326 - 247,326
Class registration & other fees 437,004 316,007 302,043 1,090 1,056,144
Total operating revenues 494,373 1,585,971 778,408 489,876 3,348,628
Operating expenses:
Cost of sales and services - 71,514 8,488 - 80,002
Personal services 494,764 710,273 644,001 121,400 1,970,438
Contractual services 95,853 340,886 144,192 150,864 731,795
Commodities 67,108 136,232 116,002 29,648 348,990
Central Services 44,451 83,017 71,105 11,772 210,345
Depreciation 22,032 183,781 35,551 511,577 752,941
Total operating expenses 724,208 1,525,703 1,019,339 825,261 4,094,511
Operating income (loss) (229,835) 60,268 (240,931) (335,385) (745,883)
Nonoperating revenues (expenses):
Investment income 2,113 22,501 8,684 5,334 38,632
Donations 20,138 - 8,500 - 28,638
Gain (loss) on sale of capital asset - (798) - - (798)
Miscellaneous - 1,690 55 - 1,745
Total nonoperating
revenues (expenses) 22,251 23,393 17,239 5,334 68,217
Income (loss) before transfers (207,584) 83,661 (223,692) (330,051) (677,666)
Transfers:
Transfers in 100,000 92,971 100,000 - 292,971
Change in net position (107,584) 176,632 (123,692) (330,051) (384,695)
Net position - January 1 (5,551) 2,419,280 681,085 8,749,468 11,844,282
Net position - December 31 (113,135)$ 2,595,912$ 557,393$ 8,419,417$ 11,459,587$
103
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Total Nonmajor
Art Edinborough Centennial Sports Proprietary
Center Park Lakes Dome Funds
Cash flows from operating activities:
Receipts from customers and users 494,373$ 1,589,062$ 779,834$ 477,889$ 3,341,158$
Payment to suppliers (210,538) (612,968) (345,043) (180,782) (1,349,331)
Payment to employees (466,505) (664,216) (610,761) (108,662) (1,850,144)
Donations received 20,138 - 8,500 - 28,638
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (162,532) 311,878 (167,470) 188,445 170,321
Cash flows from noncapital financing activities:
Transfer from other funds 100,000 92,971 100,000 - 292,971
Proceeds from interfund borrowing - - - 44,719 44,719
Miscellaneous received - 1,690 55 - 1,745
Net cash provided by noncapital
financing activities 100,000 94,661 100,055 44,719 339,435
Cash flows from capital and related financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets - (29,072) - (2,104) (31,176)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Interest received 2,136 21,076 8,218 4,807 36,237
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and investments (60,396) 398,543 (59,197) 235,867 514,817
Cash and investments - January 1 260,304 1,845,618 853,321 360,358 3,319,601
Cash and investments - December 31 199,908$ 2,244,161$ 794,124$ 596,225$ 3,834,418$
Reconciliation of operating income (loss) to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
Operating income (loss) (229,835)$ 60,268$ (240,931)$ (335,385)$ (745,883)$
Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss)
to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation 22,032 183,781 35,551 511,577 752,941
Donations 20,138 - 8,500 - 28,638
Changes in assets, deferred outflows of resources,
liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources:
Decrease (increase) in receivables - 3,091 1,426 (11,987) (7,470)
Decrease (increase) in inventory (1,732) - - - (1,732)
Decrease (increase) in deferred outflows
of resources 84,900 127,348 84,900 42,450 339,598
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable (1,404) 17,963 (5,830) 10,073 20,802
Increase (decrease) in salaries payable 1,265 2,105 3,708 1,509 8,587
Increase (decrease) in due to
other governments 10 718 574 1,429 2,731
Increase (decrease) in net OPEB obligation 1,155 1,627 676 - 3,458
Increase (decrease) in net pension liability (77,383) (116,074) (77,383) (38,691) (309,531)
Increase (decrease) in
compensated absences 3,381 8,640 6,398 - 18,419
Increase (decrease) in deferred inflows
of resources 14,941 22,411 14,941 7,470 59,763
Total adjustments 67,303 251,610 73,461 523,830 916,204
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities (162,532)$ 311,878$ (167,470)$ 188,445$ 170,321$
Noncash investing activities:
Increase (decrease) in
fair value of investments 9$ (1,522)$ (507)$ (544)$ (2,564)$
Noncash noncapital financing activities:
Acquisition of capital assets with
contracts payable -$ (57,981)$ -$ 2,104$ (55,877)$
104
Agency funds are used to report resources held by the City in a purely custodial
capacity. The following are agency funds:
Police Seizure Fund - This fund accounts for assets seized by the Police
Department.
Public Safety Training Facility - This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the
South Metro Public Safety Training Facility, which is a joint venture that the City has
fiduciary responsibilities for.
Minnesota Task Force 1 - This fund accounts for assets and liabilities of the
Minnesota Task Force 1, which is comprised of personnel and equipment from
public safety and specialist personnel from supporting entities that operates as
part of a joint powers agreement that the City has administrative responsibilities for.
Payroll Fund - This fund accounts for assets withheld from employee paychecks
that the City plans to remit to various third parties, including state & local
governments, insurance providers, and others.
FIDUCIARY FUNDS
Agency Funds
105
This page left blank intentionally.
106
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINING STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
AGENCY FUNDS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Balance Balance
January 1 Additions Deductions December 31
POLICE SEIZURE
Assets:
Cash and investments 707$ -$ -$ 707$
Liabilities:
Due to other governmental units 707$ -$ -$ 707$
PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY
Assets:
Cash and investments 706,815$ 873,420$ 1,136,849$ 443,386$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 23,188$ 292,467$ 294,284$ 21,371$
Contracts payable 292,373 13,350 305,723 -
Salaries payable 5,241 283,499 282,816 5,924
Due to other governmental units 386,013 284,104 254,026 416,091
Total Liabilities 706,815$ 873,420$ 1,136,849$ 443,386$
MINNESOTA TASK FORCE 1
Assets:
Due from other governmental units -$ 1,070,207$ 1,020,014$ 50,193$
Liabilities:
Salaries payable -$ 140,826$ 138,019$ 2,807$
Due to other governmental units - 929,381 881,995 47,386
Total Liabilities -$ 1,070,207$ 1,020,014$ 50,193$
PAYROLL
Assets:
Cash and investments 16,306$ 20,489,539$ 20,287,035$ 218,810$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 16,306$ 20,489,539$ 20,287,035$ 218,810$
TOTALS - ALL AGENCY FUNDS
Assets:
Cash and investments 723,828$ 21,362,959$ 21,423,884$ 662,903$
Due from other governmental units - 1,070,207 1,020,014 50,193
Total Assets 723,828$ 22,433,166$ 22,443,898$ 713,096$
Liabilities:
Accounts payable 39,494$ 20,782,006$ 20,581,319$ 240,181$
Contracts payable 292,373 13,350 305,723 -
Salaries payable 5,241 424,325 420,835 8,731
Due to other governmental units 386,720 1,213,485 1,136,021 464,184
Total Liabilities 723,828$ 22,433,166$ 22,443,898$ 713,096$
107
This page left blank intentionally.
108
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TAX CAPACITY, TAX LEVIES AND TAX CAPACITY RATES
(shown by year of tax collectibility)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Total tax capacity 108,069,277$ 117,907,214$ 125,663,820$ 132,180,439$ 141,934,212$
Increment valuation (4,948,237) (1,618,920) (2,493,368) (3,474,097) (4,525,127)
Contribution to fiscal
disparities pool (9,513,808) (9,626,075) (10,679,187) (11,851,919) (12,166,916)
Tax capacity used
for rate calculation 93,607,232 106,662,219 112,491,265 116,854,423 125,242,169
Fiscal disparities distribution 2,548,571 2,540,472 2,636,381 2,901,964 3,210,559
Adjusted net tax capacity 96,155,803$ 109,202,691$ 115,127,646$ 119,756,387$ 128,452,728$
Tax levies:
General fund 22,509,403$ 22,933,958$ 25,023,952$ 26,860,319$ 28,493,077$
Arts & culture fund - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000
Equipment 992,072 1,617,072 1,680,000 2,251,550 2,567,000
Debt service 3,325,597 4,510,380 4,503,521 4,595,500 4,579,700
HRA operating - - - 95,000 125,000
Total certified tax levies 26,827,072 29,081,410 31,227,473 33,822,369 35,784,777
Referendum market value levy 627,800 618,600 571,650 - -
Total levy 27,454,872$ 29,700,010$ 31,799,123$ 33,822,369$ 35,784,777$
Tax capacity rate:
General fund revenue 24.458 22.477 23.223 24.348 24.187
Bonds & interest 3.462 4.128 3.914 3.841 3.564
Total tax capacity rate 27.920 26.605 27.137 28.189 27.751
Market value rate 0.00695 0.00631 0.00550 - -
109
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMBINED SCHEDULE OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS
December 31, 2017
Final
Interest Maturity Original
Rates Date Date Issue Redeemed
General Obligation Bonds:
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2007A 4.00 - 4.25 05/24/07 02/01/28 5,865,000 1,810,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2009A 3.00 - 4.40 04/29/09 02/01/18 14,000,000 3,290,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2010A 2.00 - 4.00 11/18/10 02/01/21 8,285,000 4,155,000
GO Capital Improvement Plan, Series 2013A -
Refunding 3.00 - 3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 5,710,000 860,000
GO Refunding, Series 2014B 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/17 1,105,000 550,000
GO Refunding, Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/28 3,635,000 -
GO Refunding, Series 2017C 2.05 - 4.00 12/14/17 02/01/29 - -
Total General Obligation Bonds 38,600,000 10,665,000
Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds:
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2010B 2.00 - 3.00 11/18/10 02/01/22 2,305,000 870,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00 10/27/11 02/01/23 3,320,000 920,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2012A 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/29 2,675,000 285,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2012A - Refunding 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/19 1,990,000 1,020,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2013A 3.00 - 3.50 10/10/13 02/01/30 2,555,000 140,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2014B - Refunding 2.00 - 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/20 4,075,000 745,000
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2015A 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/32 6,545,000 -
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2015A - Parking 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/36 2,495,000 -
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/33 3,940,000 -
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving
Series 2017A 3.00 - 4.00 06/29/17 02/01/34 - -
Total PIR Bonds 29,900,000 3,980,000
Public Project Revenue Bonds:
Taxable Public Project Revenue, Series 2009A 2.10 - 4.55 11/24/09 02/01/30 2,595,000 950,000
HRA Public Project Revenue, Series 2014A 2.00 - 3.625 07/15/14 02/01/35 16,155,000 615,000
HRA Public Project Revenue, Series 2015A -
Refunding 2.50 - 3.00 07/09/15 05/01/26 3,490,000 285,000
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 22,240,000 1,850,000
Edina Emerald Energy Program Revenue Bonds:
Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012A 7.00 02/25/12 01/01/23 33,690 13,476
Edina Emerald Energy Progrm Revenue, 2012B 5.50 08/28/12 01/01/18 40,030 32,024
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 73,720 45,500
Revenue Bonds:
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009B 2.00 - 3.00 04/29/09 01/01/17 2,010,000 1,925,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2009C 2.00 - 4.00 12/10/09 02/01/18 2,440,000 585,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012B .45 - 1.60 11/15/12 02/01/20 815,000 360,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2012C 2.00 - 3.00 11/15/12 02/01/33 2,100,000 -
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2013B 3.00 - 3.45 10/10/13 02/01/29 1,125,000 115,000
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2015B 2.00 - 3.25 07/09/15 02/01/31 2,140,000 -
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2017B 3.00 - 4.00 06/29/17 02/01/33 - -
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 2017D -
Refunding 2.00 12/20/17 02/01/30 - -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A 2.00 - 3.00 10/27/11 02/01/22 11,230,000 4,170,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A 3.00 - 4.00 11/15/12 02/01/23 6,100,000 1,565,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00 - 3.00 07/15/14 02/01/24 5,680,000 1,090,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/17 1,830,000 895,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2014B - Refunding 3.00 12/11/14 02/01/19 5,710,000 1,340,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A 2.00 - 4.00 07/09/15 02/01/25 5,235,000 525,000
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2016A 2.00 - 3.00 07/06/16 02/01/27 8,775,000 -
Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2017A 3.00 - 4.00 06/29/17 02/01/28 - -
Total Public Project Revenue Bonds 55,190,000 12,570,000
Total - Bonded indebtedness 146,003,720$ 29,110,500$
Prior Years
110
Principal Interest Interest
Outstanding Payable Due Due Payable
12/31/2016 Issued Payments 12/31/2017 In 2018 In 2018 to Maturity
4,055,000 - 4,055,000 - - - -
10,710,000 - 605,000 10,105,000 10,105,000 195,662 195,662
4,130,000 - 760,000 3,370,000 790,000 119,000 276,600
4,850,000 - 285,000 4,565,000 295,000 131,250 953,038
555,000 - 555,000 - - - -
3,635,000 - - 3,635,000 285,000 94,875 543,400
- 8,955,000 - 8,955,000 - 193,108 1,809,911
27,935,000 8,955,000 6,260,000 30,630,000 11,475,000 733,895 3,778,611
1,435,000 - 225,000 1,210,000 230,000 29,613 87,075
2,400,000 - 320,000 2,080,000 325,000 52,550 185,200
2,390,000 - 150,000 2,240,000 155,000 67,250 430,675
970,000 - 385,000 585,000 360,000 16,200 20,700
2,415,000 - 140,000 2,275,000 145,000 65,425 475,725
3,330,000 - 790,000 2,540,000 815,000 55,175 94,250
6,545,000 - - 6,545,000 355,000 199,125 1,738,689
2,495,000 - 95,000 2,400,000 95,000 77,200 868,800
3,940,000 - - 3,940,000 - 109,550 982,375
- 1,995,000 - 1,995,000 - 73,935 658,236
25,920,000 1,995,000 2,105,000 25,810,000 2,480,000 746,023 5,541,725
1,645,000 - - 1,645,000 125,000 64,604 406,998
15,540,000 - 630,000 14,910,000 635,000 462,594 4,837,367
3,205,000 - 275,000 2,930,000 285,000 80,000 385,113
20,390,000 - 905,000 19,485,000 1,045,000 607,198 5,629,478
20,214 - 3,369 16,845 - 590 3,538
8,006 - 8,006 - - - -
28,220 - 11,375 16,845 - 590 3,538
85,000 - 85,000 - - - -
1,855,000 - 105,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 34,025 34,025
455,000 - 125,000 330,000 125,000 3,999 6,839
2,100,000 - - 2,100,000 - 53,794 525,709
1,010,000 - 65,000 945,000 65,000 28,590 193,177
2,140,000 - 120,000 2,020,000 120,000 55,044 451,035
- 7,425,000 - 7,425,000 80,000 298,606 2,326,056
- 1,640,000 - 1,640,000 57,000 20,136 217,026
7,060,000 - 1,115,000 5,945,000 1,130,000 144,150 431,975
4,535,000 - 575,000 3,960,000 605,000 119,050 379,675
4,590,000 - 530,000 4,060,000 540,000 99,550 401,025
935,000 - 935,000 - - - -
4,370,000 - 1,410,000 2,960,000 1,455,000 66,975 89,550
4,710,000 - 475,000 4,235,000 485,000 118,550 576,400
8,775,000 - - 8,775,000 765,000 230,237 1,197,756
- 6,595,000 - 6,595,000 - 270,589 1,536,239
42,620,000 15,660,000 5,540,000 52,740,000 7,177,000 1,543,295 8,366,487
116,893,220$ 26,610,000$ 14,821,375$ 128,681,845$ 22,177,000$ 3,631,001$ 23,319,839$
2017
111
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SCHEDULE OF BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
December 31, 2017
Grandview Centennial Valley View Southdale 2 Pentagon Park 66th West Total
District District District District District District Tax Increment
No. 1202 No. 1203 No. 1207 No. 1208 No. 1211 No. 1214 Financing Districts
Assets
Cash and Investments (85)$ 5,193,809$ 358,444$ 5,866,683$ 61,299$ -$ 11,480,150$
Accrued interest 95 18,755 1,217 15,724 281 - 36,072
Due from other districts - 3,450,000 - 275,000 - - 3,725,000
Due from other governments - - - 38,373 - - 38,373
Total assets 10$ 8,662,564$ 359,661$ 6,195,780$ 61,580$ -$ 15,279,595$
Liabilities
Accounts payable 10$ 142,925$ -$ -$ 2,537$ -$ 145,472$
Salaries payable - 1,239 - - - - 1,239
Due to other districts - - - 3,350,000 100,000 275,000 3,725,000
Total liabilities 10 144,164 - 3,350,000 102,537 275,000 3,871,711
Fund balance:
Restricted - 8,518,400 359,661 2,845,780 (40,957) (275,000) 11,407,884
Total liabilities and
fund balance 10$ 8,662,564$ 359,661$ 6,195,780$ 61,580$ -$ 15,279,595$
112
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
For The Year Ended December 31, 2017
Grandview Centennial Valley View Southdale 2 Pentagon Park 66th West Total
District District District District District District Tax Increment
No. 1202 No. 1203 No. 1207 No. 1208 No. 1211 No. 1214 Financing Districts
Revenues:
Tax increment collections -$ -$ -$ 3,422,898$ -$ -$ 3,422,898$
Intergovernmental - 3,046 - - - - 3,046
Charges for services - 40,000 - - - - 40,000
Investment income 304 62,498 4,058 52,651 935 - 120,446
Total revenues 304 105,544 4,058 3,475,549 935 - 3,586,390
Expenditures:
Current:
General government 54,100 286,851 - 19,509 29,088 - 389,548
Capital outlay:
General government - 1,309,867 - - - 275,000 1,584,867
Total expenditures 54,100 1,596,718 - 19,509 29,088 275,000 1,974,415
Revenues over
(under) expenditures (53,796) (1,491,174) 4,058 3,456,040 (28,153) (275,000) 1,611,975
Other financing sources (uses):
Interfund loan interest - 155,000 - (155,000) - - -
Net increase (decrease)
in fund balance (53,796) (1,336,174) 4,058 3,301,040 (28,153) (275,000) 1,611,975
Fund balance - January 1 53,796 9,854,574 355,603 (455,260) (12,804) - 9,795,909
Fund balance - December 31 -$ 8,518,400$ 359,661$ 2,845,780$ (40,957)$ (275,000)$ 11,407,884$
113
This page left blank intentionally.
114
Contents
Financial Trends
Revenue Capacity
Debt Capacity
Demographic and Economic Information
Operating Information
STATISTICAL SECTION
This part of the City's comprehensive annual financial report presents
detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in
the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary
information says about the City's overall financial health.
Page
116
Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules is derived from the
comprehensive annual financial reports for the relevant year.
These schedules contain trend information to help the
reader understand how the City's financial performance
and well-being have changed over time.
These schedules contain information to help the reader
assess the City's most significant local revenue source,
the property tax.
These schedules contain information to help the reader
assess the affordability of the City's current levels of
outstanding debt and the City's ability to issue additional
debt in the future.
These schedules offer demographic and economic
indicators to help the reader understand the
environment within which the City's financial activities
take place.
These schedules contain service and infrastructure data
to help the reader understand how the information in the
City's financial report relates to the services the City
provides and the activities it performs.
124
128
133
135
115
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NET POSITION BY COMPONENT
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(accrual basis of accounting)
2008 2009 2010 2011
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets 71,601,227$ 69,622,370$ 69,783,162$ 75,045,018$
Restricted 3,362,446 7,132,865 9,952,443 22,915,776
Unrestricted 29,577,462 30,705,600 41,709,528 29,544,149
Total governmental
activities net position 104,541,135$ 107,460,835$ 121,445,133$ 127,504,943$
Business-type activities
Net investment in capital assets 46,851,736$ 47,333,794$ 48,807,806$ 56,877,100$
Restricted 954,486 624,837 618,852 623,099
Unrestricted 12,071,776 15,158,720 17,041,122 12,926,674
Total business-type
activities net position 59,877,998$ 63,117,351$ 66,467,780$ 70,426,873$
Primary government
Net investment in capital assets 118,452,963$ 116,956,164$ 118,590,968$ 131,922,118$
Restricted 4,316,932 7,757,702 10,571,295 23,538,875
Unrestricted 41,649,238 45,864,320 58,750,650 42,470,823
Total primary government
net position 164,419,133$ 170,578,186$ 187,912,913$ 197,931,816$
a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of
this change in accounting principle.
b The City implemented GASB 68 in fiscal year 2015. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of
this change in accounting principle.
Fiscal Year
116
2012 2013a 2014 2015b 2016 2017
78,644,392$ 83,842,970$ 85,708,114$ 85,838,618$ 93,247,973$ 96,149,011$
23,215,910 20,289,579 18,268,724 16,925,171 20,892,680 22,840,869
29,587,700 33,242,317 31,316,605 21,957,830 22,146,168 26,412,441
131,448,002$ 137,374,866$ 135,293,443$ 124,721,619$ 136,286,821$ 145,402,321$
63,766,144$ 66,126,387$ 75,803,672$ 83,395,794$ 85,158,869$ 82,338,560$
876,909 611,377 619,295 793,664 804,393 1,338,276
14,390,609 16,867,459 21,176,026 16,405,405 17,300,872 22,443,806
79,033,662$ 83,605,223$ 97,598,993$ 100,594,863$ 103,264,134$ 106,120,642$
142,410,536$ 149,969,357$ 161,511,786$ 169,234,412$ 178,406,842$ 178,487,571$
24,092,819 20,900,956 18,888,019 17,718,835 21,697,073 24,179,145
43,978,309 50,109,776 52,492,631 38,363,235 39,447,040 48,856,247
210,481,664$ 220,980,089$ 232,892,436$ 225,316,482$ 239,550,955$ 251,522,963$
Fiscal Year
117
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN NET POSITION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(accrual basis of accounting)
2008 2009 2010 2011
Expenses
Governmental activities:
General government 6,836,248$ 7,362,560$ 6,961,082$ 7,013,231$
Public safety 14,833,647 14,751,479 15,543,594 16,024,575
Public works 9,046,873 8,993,290 8,558,363 9,193,336
Parks 5,971,565 7,732,777 5,608,758 5,540,585
Interest on long-term debt 1,923,821 2,129,490 2,528,424 2,339,370
Total governmental activities expenses 38,612,154 40,969,596 39,200,221 40,111,097
Business-type activities:
Utilities 10,625,811 11,833,994 11,848,538 12,130,685
Liquor 11,049,223 11,449,194 11,594,643 11,727,106
Aquatic center 787,663 798,369 769,608 718,027
Golf course 3,612,482 3,588,831 3,561,573 3,390,949
Arena 1,689,660 1,665,082 1,527,536 1,689,001
Community activity centers 2,813,189 2,971,293 2,965,243 2,998,915
Total business-type activities expenses 30,578,028 32,306,763 32,267,141 32,654,683
Total primary government expenses 69,190,182$ 73,276,359$ 71,467,362$ 72,765,780$
Program Revenues
Governmental activities:
Charges for services:
General government 840,070$ 811,087$ 946,107$ 969,745$
Public safety 5,839,683 5,081,563 5,448,505 5,988,485
Other activities 763,130 804,500 723,559 775,676
Operating grants and contributions 1,170,183 1,377,785 1,162,411 1,392,892
Capital grants and contributions 7,710,015 2,582,999 13,325,431 5,770,912
Total governmental activities program revenues 16,323,081 10,657,934 21,606,013 14,897,710
Business-type activities:
Charges for services:
Utilities 13,713,249 14,858,488 15,036,016 15,873,937
Liquor 12,122,599 12,655,777 12,857,064 13,172,484
Aquatic center 925,388 859,816 945,529 913,383
Golf course 3,680,584 3,660,466 3,443,204 3,285,741
Arena 1,399,599 1,414,410 1,301,506 1,315,435
Community activity centers 2,117,619 2,192,274 2,194,476 2,331,136
Operating grants and contributions 147,456 135,917 373,230 135,428
Capital grants and contributions - - - -
Total business-type activities program revenues 34,106,494 35,777,148 36,151,025 37,027,544
Total primary government program revenues 50,429,575$ 46,435,082$ 57,757,038$ 51,925,254$
Net (Expense)/Revenue
Governmental activities (22,289,073)$ (30,311,662)$ (17,594,208)$ (25,213,387)$
Business-type activities 3,528,466 3,470,385 3,883,884 4,372,861
Total primary government net expense (18,760,607)$ (26,841,277)$ (13,710,324)$ (20,840,526)$
General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position
Governmental activities:
Property taxes 22,242,276$ 23,834,274$ 25,122,113$ 25,040,871$
Tax increment collections 8,578,434 7,587,386 4,488,073 4,083,345
Franchise taxes 647,466 667,791 692,288 722,160
Lodging taxes - - - -
Unrestricted investment earnings 1,185,899 387,177 474,444 601,250
Gain on disposal of capital assets 1,265 11,709 35,594 131,365
Insurance recovery - - - -
Transfers 967,800 743,025 765,994 694,206
Total governmental activities 33,623,140 33,231,362 31,578,506 31,273,197
Business-type activities:
Property taxes -$ 300,372$ -$ -$
Unrestricted investment earnings 607,312 209,371 205,965 280,438
Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets 14,505 2,250 26,574 -
Transfers (967,800) (743,025) (765,994) (694,206)
Total business-type activities (345,983) (231,032) (533,455) (413,768)
Total primary government 33,277,157$ 33,000,330$ 31,045,051$ 30,859,429$
Change in Net Position
Governmental activities 11,334,067$ 2,919,700$ 13,984,298$ 6,059,810$
Business-type activities 3,182,483 3,239,353 3,350,429 3,959,093
Total primary government 14,516,550$ 6,159,053$ 17,334,727$ 10,018,903$
a The City implemented GASB 65 in fiscal year 2013. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle.
b The City completed a major departmental reorganization in 2014, moving parks maintenance activities from parks to public works. Prior year
information has not been modified as a result of this change.
c The City implemented GASB 68 in fiscal year 2015. Prior year information has not been restated as a result of this change in accounting principle.
Fiscal Year
118
2012 2013a 2014b 2015c 2016 2017
12,598,979$ 8,256,261$ 8,522,319$ 8,518,236$ 9,587,567$ 9,164,272$
16,598,423 17,117,693 18,145,498 19,507,770 20,243,209 21,815,101
9,437,285 11,502,250 15,553,852 15,284,777 19,444,472 17,750,505
5,904,724 6,132,709 3,330,781 3,385,367 3,822,716 4,222,431
2,222,392 2,024,749 1,989,863 2,180,678 2,133,474 1,996,354
46,761,803 45,033,662 47,542,313 48,876,828 55,231,438 54,948,663
12,610,875 13,748,186 14,207,197 14,963,304 16,780,474 17,361,659
11,740,744 12,261,413 12,393,218 11,818,602 12,130,254 12,007,885
866,944 822,932 827,485 872,960 915,560 1,015,328
3,293,192 3,199,815 3,342,544 3,409,343 3,041,169 3,469,121
2,182,200 2,272,510 2,375,173 2,642,097 2,842,660 2,961,787
2,842,139 2,967,115 2,975,782 3,436,325 3,853,091 4,095,309
33,536,094 35,271,971 36,121,399 37,142,631 39,563,208 40,911,089
80,297,897$ 80,305,633$ 83,663,712$ 86,019,459$ 94,794,646$ 95,859,752$
1,142,984$ 1,259,908$ 1,529,555$ 1,322,430$ 1,453,009$ 1,142,120$
6,549,929 7,410,755 8,102,352 8,683,465 8,996,046 9,627,122
913,864 846,999 960,261 1,158,207 1,289,770 1,288,452
1,685,026 2,283,007 1,578,538 3,122,178 2,751,495 2,194,336
9,137,011 6,372,735 8,244,695 10,044,077 15,252,861 9,775,184
19,428,814 18,173,404 20,415,401 24,330,357 29,743,181 24,027,214
17,729,589 17,831,225 17,550,802 19,335,443 19,505,905 21,361,972
13,230,941 13,711,557 13,515,168 12,462,387 12,937,092 12,991,764
1,001,946 928,055 918,412 971,936 956,068 962,857
3,225,591 2,711,743 3,229,348 2,857,190 2,809,702 1,254,412
1,452,435 1,942,971 2,092,567 2,316,853 2,314,892 2,508,192
2,399,090 2,625,633 2,583,257 3,119,789 3,190,775 3,348,628
1,042,195 516,242 428,416 595,141 445,464 179,086
- - - - - 904,201
40,081,787 40,267,426 40,317,970 41,658,739 42,159,898 43,511,112
59,510,601$ 58,440,830$ 60,733,371$ 65,989,096$ 71,903,079$ 67,538,326$
(27,332,989)$ (26,860,258)$ (27,126,912)$ (24,546,471)$ (25,488,257)$ (30,921,449)$
6,545,693 4,995,455 4,196,571 4,516,108 2,596,690 2,600,023
(20,787,296)$ (21,864,803)$ (22,930,341)$ (20,030,363)$ (22,891,567)$ (28,321,426)$
25,884,662$ 26,894,161$ 27,062,224$ 29,632,072$ 31,396,421$ 33,665,029$
3,536,935 3,981,938 5,052,705 1,792,896 2,779,097 3,422,898
815,530 1,891,967 2,055,396 2,089,038 2,346,423 2,408,884
- - 11,301 22,716 22,624 21,006
341,986 (96,390) 440,051 195,620 344,277 514,073
- 16,654 29,037 41,900 65,044 -
- 816,654 - - - -
696,935 133,907 (9,605,225) (2,230,966) 99,573 5,059
31,276,048 33,638,891 25,045,489 31,543,276 37,053,459 40,036,949
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
113,177 (77,848) 191,974 91,907 136,208 254,990
2,644,854 17,587 - 39,427 35,946 6,554
(696,935) (133,907) 9,605,225 2,230,966 (99,573) (5,059)
2,061,096 (194,168) 9,797,199 2,362,300 72,581 256,485
33,337,144$ 33,444,723$ 34,842,688$ 33,905,576$ 37,126,040$ 40,293,434$
3,943,059$ 6,778,633$ (2,081,423)$ 6,996,805$ 11,565,202$ 9,115,500$
8,606,789 4,801,287 13,993,770 6,878,408 2,669,271 2,856,508
12,549,848$ 11,579,920$ 11,912,347$ 13,875,213$ 14,234,473$ 11,972,008$
Fiscal Year
119
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
2008 2009a 2010 2011b
General fund
Reserved 13,982$ 18,241$ 10,258$ -$
Unreserved 14,365,021 12,031,358 12,868,952 -
Nonspendable - - - 10,871
Restricted - - - 178,295
Assigned - - - 1,539,286
Unassigned - - - 11,744,764
Total general fund 14,379,003$ 12,049,599$ 12,879,210$ 13,473,216$
All other governmental funds
Reserved 8,467,918$ 15,223,353$ 9,460,834$ -$
Unreserved, reported in:
Special revenue funds 14,950,538 12,813,439 15,333,460 -
Capital projects funds 4,270,440 6,683,668 12,150,968 -
Restricted, reported in:
Special revenue funds - - - 17,178,857
Debt service funds - - - 8,068,183
Construction funds - - - 2,087,548
Assigned, reported in:
Capital projects funds - - - 8,098,935
Unassigned, reported in:
Special revenue funds - - - -
Total all other governmental funds 27,688,896$ 34,720,460$ 36,945,262$ 35,433,523$
a The substantial decrease in general fund unreserved fund balance in 2009 is due to the transfer
of the equipment replacement program to the construction fund.
The substantial increase in other governmental funds reserved fund balance in 2009 is due to
unspent bond proceeds related to the new Public Works Facility, which is under construction.
b The City implemented GASB Statement No. 54, "Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental
Fund Type Definitions" in 2011. The City did not apply the statement retroactively.
c The substantial increase in other governmental funds restricted fund balance in is due to unspent
bond proceeds related to the current refunding that took place on February 1 of the following year
Fiscal Year
120
2012 2013 2014c 2015 2016c 2017c
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
- - - - - -
413,200 13,322 240,291 529,513 27,643 13,124
880,395 185,395 757,673 417,673 927,673 961,133
1,643,077 1,559,461 1,566,329 1,547,398 1,612,240 1,739,079
11,902,462 12,573,457 11,429,444 11,825,799 14,624,755 15,656,518
14,839,134$ 14,331,635$ 13,993,737$ 14,320,383$ 17,192,311$ 18,369,854$
-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
- - - - - -
- - - - - -
13,185,962 13,040,516 9,719,309 9,405,757 12,673,995 14,453,556
9,704,408 6,246,769 12,678,291 7,134,575 11,187,468 17,000,806
2,759,463 3,318,947 6,598,832 551,132 209,510 78,702
7,159,890 8,354,268 7,046,610 13,127,881 13,109,438 15,710,621
- - - - (190,845) -
32,809,723$ 30,960,500$ 36,043,042$ 30,219,345$ 36,989,566$ 47,243,685$
.
Fiscal Year
121
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(modified accrual basis of accounting)
2008 2009 2010 2011
Revenues
General property taxes 22,242,276$ 23,834,274$ 25,122,113$ 24,972,166$
Tax increment collections 8,578,434 7,587,386 4,488,073 4,083,345
Franchise taxes 647,466 667,791 692,288 722,160
Lodging fees - - - -
Special assessments 2,442,490 2,703,833 6,746,186 4,502,112
License and permits 2,915,455 2,104,967 2,410,314 2,724,763
Intergovernmental 3,005,883 1,507,170 3,726,849 3,059,964
Charges for services 3,093,941 2,905,410 3,014,894 3,181,961
Fines and forfeitures 1,073,174 1,224,983 1,203,767 1,243,426
Investment income 1,185,899 387,177 474,444 601,250
Rental of property 255,607 343,616 426,517 539,091
Parkland dedication - - - -
Other revenues 126,723 160,035 413,400 156,231
Total revenues 45,567,348 43,426,642 48,718,845 45,786,469
Expenditures
General government 6,235,352 6,895,329 6,523,398 5,739,481
Public safety 13,788,797 13,692,686 14,177,387 14,668,772
Public works 6,189,594 5,911,758 5,898,023 6,000,539
Parks 3,693,595 3,688,063 3,524,950 3,633,922
Capital outlay: 14,666,907 22,997,065 13,505,827 14,235,496
Debt service
Principal 7,090,000 7,415,000 2,975,000 4,480,000
Interest and other charges 1,967,021 1,841,342 2,584,006 2,278,068
Total expenditures 53,631,266 62,441,243 49,188,591 51,036,278
Revenues over (under) expenditures (8,063,918) (19,014,601) (469,746) (5,249,809)
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Transfers in 7,983,585 11,347,773 2,903,762 5,615,669
Transfers out (7,015,785) (10,604,748) (2,137,768) (4,921,463)
Sale of capital assets 96,825 34,592 134,329 209,773
Insurance recovery - - - -
Bonds issued 7,755,000 22,950,000 2,535,000 3,320,000
Refunding bonds issued - - 8,285,000 -
Premium on bonds issued - 64,765 898,658 108,097
Discount on bonds issued (35,848) (75,621) - -
Payment to refunding escrow - - (9,094,822) -
Total other financing sources (uses) 8,783,777 23,716,761 3,524,159 4,332,076
Net change in fund balances 719,859$ 4,702,160$ 3,054,413$ (917,733)$
Debt service as a percentage of
noncapital expenditures 22.6% 21.7% 15.4% 17.8%
Fiscal Year
122
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
25,838,422$ 26,891,756$ 26,988,493$ 29,535,270$ 31,354,023$ 33,696,550$
3,536,935 3,981,938 5,052,705 1,792,896 2,779,097 3,422,898
815,530 1,891,967 2,055,396 2,089,038 2,346,423 2,408,884
- - 11,301 22,716 22,624 21,006
4,975,641 4,884,510 4,606,010 4,132,128 5,276,194 5,330,766
3,155,351 4,150,512 4,583,183 4,907,364 5,268,519 5,403,222
2,032,966 2,509,166 3,961,509 6,093,966 5,775,114 3,687,262
3,708,482 3,667,612 4,270,720 4,414,991 4,689,389 4,917,173
1,195,054 1,109,710 1,163,907 1,195,271 1,016,817 1,135,986
341,986 (96,390) 440,051 195,314 344,344 512,448
506,276 518,862 546,874 416,522 514,955 459,099
702,100 - 757,278 800,000 1,250,000 33,460
240,841 278,607 78,775 361,425 2,599,830 761,281
47,049,584 49,788,250 54,516,202 55,956,901 63,237,329 61,790,035
6,624,573 7,351,556 7,625,826 6,337,944 6,815,725 7,065,729
14,985,068 15,859,622 16,647,821 17,537,528 18,554,507 19,233,386
6,277,506 7,018,614 10,201,335 10,578,472 10,474,008 11,524,896
3,852,260 3,915,568 1,341,884 1,416,858 1,529,384 1,695,397
13,622,443 10,690,207 19,883,144 19,912,565 16,787,575 11,053,212
6,620,000 14,531,375 4,096,375 13,276,375 5,246,375 5,496,375
2,292,394 2,270,259 1,923,647 2,375,613 2,360,827 2,359,551
54,274,244 61,637,201 61,720,032 71,435,355 61,768,401 58,428,546
(7,224,660) (11,848,951) (7,203,830) (15,478,454) 1,468,928 3,361,489
4,495,940 3,472,964 1,404,975 3,232,770 3,504,542 5,130,405
(3,799,005) (3,339,057) (11,010,200) (6,472,066) (3,404,969) (5,057,263)
94,975 61,642 70,603 78,509 65,044 84,388
- 816,654 - 167,167 - -
2,748,720 2,555,000 16,155,000 9,040,000 3,940,000 1,995,000
1,990,000 5,710,000 5,180,000 3,490,000 3,635,000 8,955,000
436,148 275,360 327,987 492,838 450,409 798,791
- (60,334) (179,891) (47,815) (16,805) (51,148)
- - - - - (3,785,000)
5,966,778 9,492,229 11,948,474 9,981,403 8,173,221 8,070,173
(1,257,882)$ (2,356,722)$ 4,744,644$ (5,497,051)$ 9,642,149$ 11,431,662$
19.4% 32.2% 13.7% 28.9% 16.2% 15.9%
Fiscal Year
123
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
ASSESSED VALUE, ACTUAL VALUE AND TAX CAPACITY OF TAXABLE PROPERTY
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
City Tax City
Used Adjusted Capacity Referendum
Estimated Limited Taxable Total for Rate Net Rate Rate
9,986,738$ 9,933,166$ 9,928,907$ 120,084$ 100,954$ 103,850$ 21.197% 0.00601% 2.204$
10,112,498 10,091,005 10,079,499 122,532 101,831 105,130 22.447% 0.00597% 2.334
9,960,341 9,960,341 9,949,807 120,817 104,914 108,452 22.972% 0.00606% 2.501
9,441,688 9,441,688 9,431,941 113,981 98,897 102,319 24.660% 0.00654% 2.672
9,179,305 9,179,305 9,025,565 109,013 94,811 97,879 26.247% 0.00667% 2.799
8,955,431 8,955,431 8,798,601 106,530 93,504 96,120 27.216% 0.00690% 2.921
9,065,550 9,065,550 8,911,695 108,069 93,607 96,156 27.920% 0.00695% 2.961
9,837,972 9,837,972 9,701,677 117,907 106,662 109,203 26.605% 0.00631% 2.953
10,420,339 10,420,339 10,296,342 125,664 112,491 115,128 27.137% 0.00550% 2.998
10,902,621 10,902,621 10,785,198 132,180 116,854 119,756 28.189% 0.00000% 3.096
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
a Property in the City is assessed annually. Assessed value is equal to market value, although taxable value may be different, as shown.
The City receives reports from Hennepin County showing total market value, but not separated by property classification.
b This value is estimated by the City Finance Department by taking City taxes as a rate of estimated market value (rate per $1,000 of
assessed value). The property tax system in Minnesota uses a tax capacity system whereby each parcel is assigned a tax capacity
based on taxable value and class. In Minnesota, local taxes are usually expressed as a percentage of this calculated tax capacity
(see column titled "City Tax Capacity Rate"). Therefore, this rate is only theoretical and shown for comparative purposes only.
Estimated
Rate b
Market Value (In Thousands) a Tax Capacity (In Thousands)
2014
Fiscal Direct
2012
2013
2008
2009
2010
2011
2017
Year
2015
2016
124
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING TAX CAPACITY RATES
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Total
Basic Debt Total Tax Direct &
Rate Rate Capacity RMV Hennepin Tax Cap. RMV Other Overlap
19.563% 1.634% 21.197% 0.006% 38.571% 16.951% 0.177% 8.546% 85.265%
20.204% 2.243% 22.447% 0.006% 40.413% 17.766% 0.183% 8.413% 89.039%
20.004% 2.968% 22.972% 0.006% 42.640% 18.746% 0.194% 9.431% 93.789%
21.548% 3.112% 24.660% 0.007% 45.840% 21.786% 0.196% 10.489% 102.775%
23.131% 3.116% 26.247% 0.007% 48.231% 27.565% 0.215% 10.911% 112.954%
23.762% 3.454% 27.216% 0.007% 49.461% 27.762% 0.217% 11.483% 115.922%
24.458% 3.462% 27.920% 0.007% 49.959% 27.556% 0.223% 12.051% 117.486%
22.477% 4.128% 26.605% 0.006% 46.398% 27.344% 0.215% 11.100% 111.447%
23.223% 3.914% 27.137% 0.006% 45.356% 34.898% 0.201% 11.254% 118.645%
24.348% 3.841% 28.189% 0.000% 44.087% 34.798% 0.188% 11.057% 118.131%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
RMV: Referendum Market Value
Geographic boundaries for overlapping district are not identical to the City's boundaries. City boundaries contain six different
school districts but only ISD #273 is shown here. Other districts include Mosquito Control, Met Council, Metro Transit,
Hennepin Parks, Park Museum and Regional Railroad Authority. In addition, there are two watershed districts in the City,
Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek, and rates for Nine Mile are included in Other. Total rates do not include RMV rates.
2017
2012
2013
2008
2009
2010
2011
2014
2015
2016
City Rates Overlapping Rates
ISD #273 EdinaFiscal
Year
125
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL PROPERTY TAX PAYERS
CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO
Percentage Percentage
of Total of Total
Tax Capacity Rank Capacity Tax Capacity Rank Capacity
Southdale Shopping Center 3,011,180$ 1 2.28% 3,497,098$ 1 2.91%
Galleria Shopping Center 2,662,551 2 2.01% 1,300,806 2 1.08%
Southdale Medical Building 1,310,247 3 0.99% DNA DNA DNA
Centennial Lakes Retail 914,184 4 0.69% 926,094 3 0.77%
Southdale Office Center 913,294 5 0.69% 910,362 4 0.76%
Centennial Lakes Phase V 772,440 6 0.58% 756,518 5 0.63%
Centennial Lakes Phase IV 757,480 7 0.57% 741,842 6 0.62%
7700 France 598,664 8 0.45% DNA DNA DNA
The District 588,448 9 0.45% DNA DNA DNA
Westin Galleria 547,949 10 0.41% DNA DNA DNA
National Car - 0.00% 631,752 7 0.53%
Macy's Department Stores - 0.00% 520,174 8 0.43%
Target - 0.00% 510,186 9 0.42%
Centennial Lakes Medical Building - 0.00% 483,056 10 0.40%
Totals 12,076,437$ 9.14% 10,277,888$ 8.56%
Source: City of Edina Assessing Office
DNA: Historical data is not available
20082017
Taxpayer
126
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PROPERTY TAX LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
Total Collections in
Tax Percentage Subsequent Percentage
Levy Amount of Levy Years Amount of Levy
22,605,669$ 22,178,719$ a 98.11%a 174,769$ 22,353,488$ 98.88%
24,153,933 23,484,137 b 97.23%b 69,437 23,553,574 97.51%
25,492,973 24,904,346 97.69% (310,913) 24,593,433 96.47%
25,786,217 25,067,625 97.21% (202,079) 24,865,546 96.43%
26,248,226 25,983,685 98.99% (132,633) 25,851,052 98.49%
26,747,384 26,545,984 99.25% (201,738) 26,344,246 98.49%
27,454,872 27,326,092 99.53% (65,036) 27,261,056 99.29%
29,700,010 29,497,362 99.32% (94,658) 29,402,704 99.00%
31,799,123 31,383,415 98.69% 14,869 31,398,284 98.74%
33,822,369 33,645,085 99.48% - 33,645,085 99.48%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services.
a In 2008 the State of Minnesota reimbursed the City for only 50% of MVHC.
b In 2009 the State of Minnesota once again quit reimbursing the City for MVHC.
2017
Collected within the
Fiscal Year of the Levy
2011
2008
2009
2010
2015
2014
2016
Total Collections to Date
Taxes
Payable
2012
2013
127
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RATIOS OF OUTSTANDING DEBT BY TYPE
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands, except per capita)
General Public Tax Permanent EEEP Rec. Utility Total Percentage
Obligation Project Increment Improvement Revenue Facility Revenue Primary of Personal Per
Debt Revenue Bonds Revolving Bonds Bonds Bonds Government Income Capita
a
10,393$ 14,531$ 10,000$ 14,719$ -$ 2,835$ 23,779$ 76,257$ 2.99% 1,583$
24,057 22,442 4,115 14,574 - 4,479 21,713 91,380 3.54% 1,897
32,595 13,282 3,314 16,254 - 4,059 19,507 89,011 3.39% 1,857
30,417 13,077 2,477 18,353 - 3,569 28,800 96,693 3.66% 2,004
28,318 11,787 550 22,067 74 5,952 33,160 101,908 3.71% 2,087
32,035 5,627 - 18,889 62 6,540 29,635 92,788 2.91% 1,885
30,806 21,445 - 21,554 51 6,249 39,633 119,738 3.97% 2,382
27,225 21,300 - 24,776 40 8,055 32,575 113,971 3.62% 2,245
28,560 20,395 - 26,874 28 7,677 36,691 120,225 3.68% 2,321
31,748 19,485 - 26,772 17 16,946 38,661 133,629 4.09% 2,580
Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements.
All figures are presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments if applicable.
a Population data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council found on page 133.
Business-Type Activities
Year
Fiscal
2017
2008
2009
2010
2011
2014
2015
2012
2013
2016
Governmental Activities
128
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
RATIOS OF GENERAL BONDED DEBT OUTSTANDING
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands, except per capita)
Less: Amounts Available Percentage of
General Obligation Debt a in Debt Service Fund b Total Property Value
c Per Capita
10,393$ 3,669$ 6,724$ 0.07% 216$
24,057 5,454 18,603 0.18% 499
32,595 6,105 26,490 0.27% 680
30,417 8,068 22,349 0.24% 630
28,318 9,704 18,614 0.20% 580
32,035 6,247 25,788 0.29% 651
30,806 12,678 18,128 0.20% 613
27,225 7,135 20,090 0.20% 536
28,560 11,187 17,373 0.17% 551
31,748 17,001 14,747 0.14% 613
Details regarding the City's outstanding debt may be found in the notes to the financial statements.
a Presented net of related premiums, discounts, and adjustments.
b This is the amount restricted for debt service principal payments.
c See statistical schedule titled "Assessed Value, Actual Value and Tax Capacity of Taxable Property" for
estimated property value data.
Year
Fiscal
2012
2017
2015
2014
2013
2008
2009
2010
2011
2016
129
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DIRECT AND OVERLAPPING GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES DEBT
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2017
Net General Percentage
Obligation Bonded Applicable City Share
Debt Outstanding in City a of Debt
Overlapping Debt:
Hennepin County 911,083,511$ 7.43% 67,695,505$
Hennepin Suburban Park District 45,784,829 10.37% 4,747,887
Hennepin Regional Rail Authority 26,942,546 10.37% 2,793,942
School Districts:
ISD No. 273 (Edina) 181,497,226 98.60% 178,956,265
ISD No. 270 (Hopkins) 140,286,562 7.62% 10,689,836
ISD No. 271 (Bloomington) 74,094,529 0.01% 7,409
ISD No. 272 (Eden Prairie) 58,290,831 1.01% 588,737
ISD No. 280 (Richfield) 21,321,981 30.97% 6,603,418
ISD No. 283 (St. Louis Park) 33,819,742 0.01% 3,382
Metro Council 12,606,580 3.80% 479,050
Total Overlapping Debt 1,505,728,337 272,565,431
City of Edina 78,020,797 100.00% 78,020,797
Total Overlapping and Direct Debt 1,583,749,134$ 350,586,228$
Ratio of debt per capita (51,804 population) 6,768$
Ratio of debt to estimated market valuation of $10,902,621,300 3.22%
Source: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services
a The percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using tax capacity. Applicable percentages
were estimated by determining the portion of another governmental unit's tax capacity that is within
the City's boundaries and dividing it by each unit's total tax capacity.
Direct Debt:
Debt Ratios:
130
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
LEGAL DEBT MARGIN INFORMATION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
(dollars in thousands)
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Debt limit 302,385$ 301,369$ 298,494$ 282,958$ 270,767$ 263,958$ 267,351$ 291,050$ 308,890$ 323,556$
Total net debt
applicable
to limit 25,095 46,670 45,170 42,860 39,545 37,030 51,760 48,000 48,325 50,115
Legal debt
margin 277,290$ 254,699$ 253,324$ 240,098$ 231,222$ 226,928$ 215,591$ 243,050$ 260,565$ 273,441$
Total net debt
applicable to
the limit as a
percentage of
debt limit 8.30% 15.49% 15.13% 15.15% 14.60% 14.03% 19.36% 16.49% 15.64% 15.49%
Market value (after fiscal disparities)
Debt limit (3% of market value)
Debt applicable to limit:
General obligation bonds
Public project revenue bonds
Total debt applicable to limit
Legal debt margin
323,555,954
19,485,000
273,440,954$
Fiscal Year
10,785,198,454$
30,630,000
50,115,000
Legal Debt Margin Calculation for Fiscal Year 2017
131
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PLEDGED REVENUE COVERAGE
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Less: operating Net available
Revenue expenses revenue Principal Interest Total Coverage
Public Project Revenue Bonds (Annual Appropriation Lease Revenue)
2008 1,425,186$ -$ 1,425,186$ 715,000$ 696,118$ 1,411,118$ 1.01
2009 1,424,405 - 1,424,405 745,000 665,193 1,410,193 1.01
2010 1,421,354 - 1,421,354 9,280,000 901,535 10,181,535 0.14
2011 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 210,000 574,681 784,681 1.72
2012 1,362,444 - 1,362,444 1,295,000 548,691 1,843,691 0.74
2013 1,346,294 - 1,346,294 6,225,000 589,734 6,814,734 0.20
2014 1,356,844 - 1,356,844 235,000 223,754 458,754 2.96
2015 2,521,840 - 2,521,840 3,760,000 729,879 4,489,879 0.56
2016 2,499,521 - 2,499,521 900,000 654,473 1,554,473 1.61
2017 2,496,500 - 2,496,500 905,000 633,527 1,538,527 1.62
Tax Increment Bonds
2008 8,578,434 - 8,578,434 5,650,000 445,694 6,095,694 1.41
2009 7,587,386 - 7,587,386 5,890,000 244,236 6,134,236 1.24
2010 4,488,073 - 4,488,073 805,000 125,820 930,820 4.82
2011 4,083,345 - 4,083,345 840,000 94,359 934,359 4.37
2012 3,536,935 - 3,536,935 1,930,000 48,445 1,978,445 1.79
2013 3,981,939 - 3,981,939 550,000 9,350 559,350 7.12
2014 5,052,705 - 5,052,705 - - - -
2015 1,792,896 - 1,792,896 - - - -
2016 2,779,097 - 2,779,097 - - - -
2017 3,422,898 - 3,422,898 - - - -
Permanent Improvement Revolving Bonds (Special Assessment)
2008 564,534 - 564,534 155,000 306,759 461,759 1.22
2009 1,508,662 - 1,508,662 150,000 513,708 663,708 2.27
2010 1,339,350 - 1,339,350 655,000 520,278 1,175,278 1.14
2011 2,466,395 - 2,466,395 1,330,000 524,964 1,854,964 1.33
2012 2,520,862 - 2,520,862 1,375,000 557,514 1,932,514 1.30
2013 2,837,227 - 2,837,227 5,745,000 567,551 6,312,551 0.45
2014 2,870,102 - 2,870,102 1,555,000 548,927 2,103,927 1.36
2015 3,732,374 - 3,732,374 6,015,000 503,029 6,518,029 0.57
2016 4,727,881 - 4,727,881 1,925,000 705,628 2,630,628 1.80
2017 4,746,414 - 4,746,414 2,105,000 745,783 2,850,783 1.66
Utility Bond
2008 13,544,728 10,076,422 3,468,306 1,485,000 459,983 1,944,983 1.78
2009 14,857,798 10,815,216 4,042,582 2,045,000 803,157 2,848,157 1.42
2010 15,034,881 11,119,053 3,915,828 2,185,000 768,160 2,953,160 1.33
2011 15,871,102 11,438,288 4,432,814 2,270,000 693,285 2,963,285 1.50
2012 17,723,103 11,811,468 5,911,635 2,360,000 811,990 3,171,990 1.86
2013 17,830,425 12,893,159 4,937,266 3,400,000 933,970 4,333,970 1.14
2014 17,548,883 13,443,940 4,104,943 3,670,000 884,075 4,554,075 0.90
2015 19,334,023 14,387,132 4,946,891 12,300,000 882,427 13,182,427 0.38
2016 19,472,645 16,222,211 3,250,434 4,925,000 814,238 5,739,238 0.57
2017 21,360,262 16,718,288 4,641,974 5,040,000 930,123 5,970,123 0.78
Recreational Facility Bonds
2008 6,005,571 5,972,558 33,013 845,000 135,956 980,956 0.03
2009 5,932,900 5,977,793 (44,893) 860,000 92,128 952,128 (0.05)
2010 5,690,239 5,822,861 (132,622) 415,000 100,926 515,926 (0.26)
2011 5,510,043 5,760,947 (250,904) 485,000 115,050 600,050 (0.42)
2012 5,679,972 6,240,222 (560,250) 520,000 105,000 625,000 (0.90)
2013 5,582,769 6,118,195 (535,426) 550,000 138,127 688,127 (0.78)
2014 6,239,445 6,358,030 (118,585) 290,000 176,197 466,197 (0.25)
2015 6,137,111 6,258,138 (121,027) 350,000 176,808 526,808 (0.23)
2016 6,080,529 6,593,312 (512,783) 375,000 231,285 606,285 (0.85)
2017 4,724,288 6,247,649 (1,523,361) 500,000 217,958 717,958 (2.12)
Debt service requirementsFiscal
Year
132
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC STATISTICS
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Estimated
Personal Per Capita High School
Income Personal Graduation Unemployment
Population (In thousands) Income Rate Rate
48,169 2,547,369$ 52,884$ 92.0% 4.33%
48,169 2,582,436 53,612 92.4% 6.38%
47,941 2,622,564 54,704 91.6% 5.56%
48,262 2,640,124 54,704 92.2% 5.25%
48,829 2,749,854 56,316 97.4% 4.56%
49,216 3,193,922 64,896 97.7% 3.98%
50,261 3,018,676 60,060 97.8% 3.10%
50,766 3,146,680 61,984 97.9% 2.82%
51,804 3,264,895 63,024 97.7% 3.08%
51,804 3,264,895 63,024 97.9% 2.83%
Sources:
Population data from U.S. Census Bureau/Metropolitan Council. 2016 is the most recent.
Personal income and per capita income estimates based on MN Department of Employment
and Economic Development Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages. 2016 is the most recent.
High school graduation rate data from U.S. Census Bureau for all of Hennepin County.
Unemployment rate data from State of Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.
2017
2014
2015
Fiscal
Year
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2016
133
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PRINCIPAL EMPLOYERS
CURRENT YEAR AND NINE YEARS AGO
Percentage of Percentage of
Total City Total City
Employees Rank Employment Employees Rank Employment
Fairview Southdale Hospital 2,613 1 10.62% 2,500 2 11.47%
Edina Public Schools ISD #273 1,343 2 5.46% 1,172 4 5.38%
BI Worldwide 1,000 3 4.06% DNA DNA DNA
Regis Corporation 900 4 3.66% DNA DNA DNA
City of Edina 883 5 3.59% 262 7 1.20%
Spartan Nash 450 6 1.83% DNA DNA DNA
Edina Realty 400 7 1.63% 210 9 0.96%
International Dairy Queen Inc. 400 8 1.63% 300 6 1.38%
Lund Food Holdings, Inc 400 9 1.63% DNA DNA DNA
FilmTec Corporation 375 10 1.52% DNA DNA DNA
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. - 0.00% 4,500 1 20.64%
Macy's (Marshall Field's or Dayton's) - 0.00% 1,200 3 5.50%
Nash Finch Co. - 0.00% 350 5 1.61%
JC Penny Co. - 0.00% 250 8 1.15%
Con Agra Foods - 0.00% 196 10 0.90%
Totals 8,764 35.61% 10,940 50.17%
Sources:
2017 data from ReferenceUSA, written and telephone survey (May 2017) done by Ehlers,
and the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.
2008 data from previous CAFR.
DNA: Historical data is not available
20082017
Employer
134
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT CITY GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 b 2013 b 2014 b 2015 2016 2017
Administration
General Fund 9.25 9.25 9.25 9.25 6.85 5.85 4.85 4.85 5.00 5.00
HRA Fund - - - - - - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Liquor Fund 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00
Communications and Technology Services
General Fund 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.50 4.65 5.15 6.15 6.15 6.00 6.00
Central Services 3.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Community Development
General Fund 10.75 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 10.85 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Engineering
General Fund 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 10.50 12.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 14.00
Finance
General Fund 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 6.00 6.00 5.00 5.00
Utilities Fund 1.75 2.75 2.75 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Liquor Fund 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 - - - -
Fire Protection
General Fund 40.50 40.50 40.50 39.50 39.75 42.75 42.85 43.85 45.90 45.90
Utilities Fund 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 - -
Human Resources
General Fund - - - - 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 5.00
Parks & Recreation
General Fund 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 6.80 8.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00
Aquatic Center 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.60 0.60
Golf Course 13.00 13.00 13.00 11.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 8.05 8.05
Arena 6.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.85 4.85
Sports Dome - - - - - - - - 0.15 0.15
Art Center 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
Edinborough Park 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 7.00 5.80 5.80 5.80 5.80 5.80
Centennial Lakes 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00
Police Protection
General Fund 73.75 74.65 73.65 71.15 71.65 70.65 72.50 70.50 72.55 72.55
Utilities Fund 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.45 0.45
Public Works
General Fund 48.40 47.40 47.40 47.20 48.20 46.40 43.35 43.35 43.45 43.45
Construction Fund 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.10
Utilities Fund 13.25 15.25 15.25 14.45 13.95 13.75 15.20 15.20 16.85 16.85
Central Services 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 8.50 11.00 11.00 10.25 10.25
Other 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - - - - -
Total 278.00 281.00 280.00 274.00 278.00 281.00 285.00 285.00 287.00 287.00
Source: City of Edina 2016-2017 Budget
a Full-time employee counts do not include Council members, part-time, contract or seasonal employees. In a typical
year the City will employ an additional 600-700 people in these categories.
b The City completed a major departmental reorganization that is reflected on this chart between years 2012-2014.
In some cases, data for years before the reorganization has been modified from what was originally reported to
improve comparisons.
Budgeted Full-time Employees for Fiscal Year a
Function
135
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
OPERATING INDICATORS BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
General Government
Total City employees 918 885 869 892 989 1,040 1,093 1,077 1,155 1,067
Votes cast a 31,512 2,733 25,463 7,957 31,841 3,480 24,049 9,370 31,986 11,440
Public Works
Asphalt placed (tons) 7,500 9,500 7,643 8,500 9,000 9,273 8,383 8,888 9,298 11,176
Concrete (cu. yds.) 480 640 503 558 667 560 396 670 897 708
Public Safety
Crimes reported 2,025 1,985 1,890 1,590 1,628 1,594 1,571 2,015 2,143 N/A
Fire calls 913 852 910 960 858 893 926 1,251 1,276 1,220
Medical calls 3,516 3,496 3,599 3,652 3,946 3,803 3,982 3,818 4,063 4,508
Central Services
Vehicle fixes 2,967 2,539 2,431 2,331 2,546 3,493 3,277 2,923 2,721 2,478
Utilities
Daily consumption b 7,376 7,596 6,790 6,909 7,613 6,652 6,489 6,308 6,047 5,950
Aquatic Center
Attendance 110,000 64,836 86,654 77,696 139,909 91,340 92,200 128,523 108,609 89,318
Golf Course
Total rounds played 112,663 117,819 101,314 95,771 96,496 79,529 85,231 66,483 61,256 23,241
Source: Various City departments
N/A Data not available
a The City Elections department runs general elections in even-numbered years and school district elections in odd-numbered years.
Number of votes cast tend to vary between even and odd-numbered years and based on presidential election cycles.
b Daily average of water pumped from city wells, measured in thousands of gallons.
Fiscal Year
Function
136
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CAPITAL ASSET STATISTICS BY FUNCTION
LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Public Works
Miles of streets 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224 224
City parking ramps 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Public Safety
Fire stations 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Parks & Recreation
City parks 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Acreage of parks 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553 1,553
Park buildings 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27
Utilities
Wells 19 19 19 18 18 18 18 18 18 18
Watermain miles 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199
Sanitary sewer miles 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186 186
Sewer connections 14,851 13,933 13,933 13,933 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979 13,979
Arena
Ice sheets 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
Source: Various City departments
Fiscal Year
Function
137
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
EdinaMN.gov
952-826-0366
Management Report
for
City of Edina, Minnesota
December 31, 2017
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
We have prepared this management report in conjunction with our audit of the City of Edina, Minnesota’s
(the City) financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017. We have organized this report into
the following sections:
•Audit Summary
•Governmental Funds Overview
•Enterprise Funds Overview
•Government-Wide Financial Statements
•Legislative Updates
•Accounting and Auditing Updates
We would be pleased to further discuss any of the information contained in this report or any other
concerns that you would like us to address. We would also like to express our thanks for the courtesy and
assistance extended to us during the course of our audit.
The purpose of this report is solely to provide those charged with governance of the City, management,
and those who have responsibility for oversight of the financial reporting process comments resulting
from our audit process and information relevant to city finances in Minnesota. Accordingly, this report is
not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 6, 2018
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-1-
AUDIT SUMMARY
The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider
important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged
with governance of the City.
OUR RESPONSIBILITY UNDER AUDITING STANDARDS GENERALLY ACCEPTED IN THE UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA AND GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each
major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2017, and the related notes to the financial statements. Professional standards require that
we provide you with information about our responsibilities under auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards, as well as certain information related
to the planned scope and timing of our audit. We have communicated such information to you verbally
and in our audit engagement letter. Professional standards also require that we communicate the following
information related to our audit.
PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT
We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated
in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit.
AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS
Based on our audit of the City’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017:
• We have issued an unmodified opinion on the City’s basic financial statements.
• We reported no deficiencies involving the City’s internal control over financial reporting that we
consider to be material weaknesses.
• The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance required to be reported under
Government Auditing Standards.
• We reported one finding based on our testing of the City’s compliance with Minnesota laws and
regulations:
o Two of twenty-five claims for payment tested were not paid within thirty-five days of the
receipt of goods or services, or receipt of the invoice for goods or services, whichever is
later, as required by Minnesota Statutes.
-2-
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant
accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements.
No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during
the year ended December 31, 2017; however, the City implemented the following governmental
accounting standards during the fiscal year:
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 79, Certain External
Investment Pools and Pool Participants, which enhanced disclosures regarding investments.
• GASB Statement No. 82, Pension Issues, an amendment of GASB Statements No. 67, No. 68, and
No. 73, which addressed certain issues related to pension reporting and disclosures.
We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative
guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statement s in the
proper period.
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND MANAGEMENT JUDGMENTS
Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are
based on management’s knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about
future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the
financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ
significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimates affecting the financial statements were:
• Depreciation – Management’s estimates of depreciation expense are based on the estimated
useful lives of the assets.
• Compensated Absences – Management’s estimate is based on current rates of pay and sick leave
balances.
• Net Other Post-Employment Benefit (OPEB) Liabilities – Actuarial estimates of the net OPEB
obligation is based on eligible participants, estimated future health insurance premiums, and
estimated retirement dates.
• Pension Benefits – Actuarial estimates of net pension liabilities (assets) are calculated using
actuarial calculations that include significant assumptions, including projected changes,
investment returns, retirement ages, proportionate share, and employee turnover.
We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used by management to develop these accounting estimates
in determining that they are reasonable in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
The financial statement disclosures are neutral, consistent, and clear.
CORRECTED AND UNCORRECTED MISSTATEMENTS
Professional standards require us to accumulate all known and likely misstatements identified during the
audit, other than those that are trivial, and communicate them to the appropriate level of management.
Where applicable, management has corrected all such misstatements. In addition, none of the
misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management, when applicable,
were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to each opinion unit’s financial statements taken as
a whole.
-3-
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN PERFORMING THE AUDIT
We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our
audit.
DISAGREEMENTS WITH MANAGEMENT
For purposes of this report, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting, or
auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial
statements or the auditor’s report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the
course of our audit.
MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIONS
We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management
representation letter dated June 6, 2018.
MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIONS WITH OTHER INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting
matters, similar to obtaining a “second opinion” on certain situations . If a consultation involves
application of an accounting principle to the City’s financial statements or a determination of the type of
auditor’s opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the
consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts . To our
knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants.
OTHER AUDIT FINDINGS OR ISSUES
We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing
standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City’s auditors . However, these
discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a
condition to our retention.
OTHER MATTERS
We applied certain limited procedures to the management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) and the
remaining required supplementary information (RSI) that supplements the basic financial statements. Our
procedures consisted of inquiries of management regarding the methods of preparing the information and
comparing the information for consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic
financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements.
We did not audit the RSI and do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the RSI.
We were engaged to report on the combining and individual fund financial statements and schedules
accompanying the financial statements, which are not RSI. With respect to this supplementary
information, we made certain inquiries of management and evaluated the form, content, and methods of
preparing the information to determine that the information complies with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, the method of preparing it has not changed from the prior
period, and the information is appropriate and complete in relation to our audit of the financial statements.
We compared and reconciled the supplementary information to the underlying accounting records used to
prepare the financial statements or to the financial statements themselves.
We were not engaged to report on the introductory section, the supplementary financial information, and
the statistical section, which accompany the financial statements, but are not RSI. Such information has
not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and,
accordingly, we do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on it.
-4-
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS OVERVIEW
This section of the report provides you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City’s
governmental funds, which include the General, special revenue, debt service, and capital project funds.
These funds are used to account for the basic services the City provides to all of its citizens, which are
financed primarily with property taxes. The governmental fund information in the City’s financial
statements focuses on budgetary compliance, and the sufficiency of each governmental fund’s current
assets to finance its current liabilities.
PROPERTY TAXES
Minnesota cities rely heavily on local property tax levies to support their governmental fund activities.
For the 2016 fiscal year, local ad valorem property tax levies provided 39.8 percent of the total
governmental fund revenues for cities over 2,500 in population, and 36.4 percent for cities under 2,500 in
population.
The total market value of property in Minnesota cities increased about 5.6 percent for the 2017 levy year,
which followed an increase of 5.7 percent for levy year 2016. T he market values used for levying
property taxes are based on the previous fiscal year (e.g., market values for taxes levied in 2017 were
based on assessed values as of January 1, 2016), so the trend of change in these market values lags
somewhat behind the housing market and economy in general.
The City’s taxable market value increased 6.1 percent for taxes payable in 2016 and increased 4.7 percent
for taxes payable in 2017. The following graph shows the City’s changes in taxable market value over the
past 10 years:
$–
$2,000,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$8,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000
$12,000,000,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Taxable Market Value
-5-
Tax capacity is considered the actual base available for taxation. It is calculated by applying the state’s
property classification system to each property’s market value . Each property classification, such as
commercial or residential, has a different calculation and uses different rates . Consequently, a city’s total
tax capacity will change at a different rate than its total market value, as tax capacity is affected by the
proportion of its tax base that is in each property classification from year -to-year, as well as legislative
changes to tax rates. The City’s tax capacity increased 6.6 percent and decreased 5.2 percent for taxes
payable in 2016 and 2017, respectively.
The following graph shows the City’s change in tax capacities over the past 10 years:
$–
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
$140,000,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Local Tax Capacity
The following table presents the average tax rates applied to city residents for each of the last three levy
years, along with comparative state-wide and metro area average rates from the two most recent years for
which the information is available:
2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Average tax rate
City 46.9 46.5 43.4 43.0 26.6 27.1 28.2
County 44.7 44.1 42.9 42.3 46.4 45.4 44.1
School 27.1 27.5 28.3 28.6 27.4 33.7 34.8
Special taxing 6.9 6.9 8.8 8.7 11.3 10.9 11.0
Total 125.6 125.0 123.4 122.6 111.7 117.2 118.1
Note: State-wide and metro area average tax rates are not available for 2017.
Rates Expressed as a Percentage of Net Tax Capacity
City of EdinaMetro Area
Seven-CountyAll Cities
State-Wide
The City’s portion of the tax capacity rates for its residents has historically been well below the state-wide
and metro area averages.
-6-
GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES
The following table summarizes the changes in the fund balances of the City’s governmental funds during
the year ended December 31, 2017, presented both by fund balance classification and by fund:
Increase
2017 2016 (Decrease)
Fund balances of governmental funds
Total by classification
Nonspendable 13,124$ 27,643$ (14,519)$
Restricted 32,494,197 24,998,646 7,495,551
Assigned 17,449,700 14,721,678 2,728,022
Unassigned 15,656,518 14,433,910 1,222,608
Total – governmental funds 65,613,539$ 54,181,877$ 11,431,662$
Total by fund
General 18,369,854$ 17,192,311$ 1,177,543$
Housing and Redevelopment Authority 13,447,196 11,799,747 1,647,449
Debt Service 17,000,806 11,187,468 5,813,338
Construction 15,710,621 13,109,438 2,601,183
Nonmajor funds 1,085,062 892,913 192,149
Total – governmental funds 65,613,539$ 54,181,877$ 11,431,662$
as of December 31,
Fund Balance
Governmental Funds Change in Fund Balance
In total, the fund balances of the City’s governmental funds increased by $11,431,662 during the year
ended December 31, 2017. The significant increase in the Debt Service Fund is due to the City issuing
refunding bonds in the current year, the proceeds of which are restricted until the bonds are refunded.
-7-
GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
The following table presents the per capita revenue of the City’s governmental funds for the past
three years, along with state-wide averages.
We have included the most recent comparative state-wide averages available from the Office of the State
Auditor to provide a benchmark for interpreting the City’s data. The amounts received from the typical
major sources of governmental fund revenue will naturally vary between cities based on factors such as a
city’s stage of development, location, size and density of its population, property values, services it
provides, and other attributes. It will also differ from year-to-year due to the effect of inflation and
changes in its operation. Also, certain data on these tables may be classified differently than how they
appear on the City’s financial statements in order to be more comparable to the state -wide information,
particularly in separating capital expenditures from current expenditures.
We have designed this section of our management report using per capita data in order to better identify
unique or unusual trends and activities of the City. We intend for this type of comparative and trend
information to complement, rather than duplicate, information in the MD&A. An inherent difficulty in
presenting per capita information is the accuracy of the population count, which for most years is based
on estimates.
Year 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 50,766 51,804 51,804
Property taxes 443$ 455$ 582$ 605$ 650$
Tax increments 37 42 35 54 66
Franchise taxes 39 45 42 46 47
Special assessments 59 59 81 102 103
Licenses and permits 43 42 97 102 104
Intergovernmental revenues 156 152 120 111 71
Charges for services 94 103 87 91 95
Other 58 54 58 111 56
Total revenue 929$ 952$ 1,102$ 1,222$ 1,192$
Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
City of EdinaState-Wide
The City has historically received more of its governmental fund revenue from property taxes than the
average Minnesota city, while having a lower tax rate, as shown on the table above. Property tax revenue
increased by $45 per capita, due to an increased property tax levy. Other revenues decreased by $55 per
capita due to unanticipated revenue received from a development to be spent on affordable housing and
parkland dedication fees in the previous year.
-8-
The expenditures of governmental funds will also vary from state -wide averages and from year-to-year,
based on the City’s circumstances. Expenditures are classified into three types as follows:
• Current – These are typically the general operating type expenditures occurring on an annual
basis, and are primarily funded by general sources such as taxes and intergovernmental revenues.
• Capital Outlay and Construction – These expenditures do not occur on a consistent basis, more
typically fluctuating significantly from year-to-year. Many of these expenditures are
project-oriented, and are often funded by specific sources that have benefited from the
expenditure, such as special assessment improvement projects.
• Debt Service – Although the expenditures for debt service may be relatively consistent over the
term of the respective debt, the funding source is the important factor. Some debt may be repaid
through specific sources such as special assessments or redevelopment funding, while other debt
may be repaid with general property taxes.
The City’s expenditures per capita of its governmental funds for the past three years, together with
state-wide averages, are presented in the following table:
Year 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 50,766 51,804 51,804
Current
89$ 97$ 125$ 132$ 136$
261 273 345 358 371
99 95 208 202 222
94 95 28 30 33
89 91 – – –
Total current 632$ 651$ 706$ 722$ 762$
Capital outlay
and construction 286$ 301$ 392$ 324$ 213$
Debt service
117$ 115$ 262$ 101$ 106$
33 34 47 46 46
150$ 149$ 309$ 147$ 152$
General government
City of EdinaState-Wide
Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
Total debt service
Interest and fiscal charges
Public safety
Streets and highways
Parks and recreation
All other
Principal
The City’s governmental funds current per capita expenditures are higher than state -wide averages for
cities in the same population class. The City’s current operating costs are higher than average for public
safety service costs, which is partially caused by the City having a full-time fire department.
-9-
GENERAL FUND
The City’s General Fund accounts for the financial activity of the basic services provided to the
community. The primary services included within this fund are the administration of the municipal
operation, police and fire protection, building inspection, streets and highway maintenance, and parks and
recreation. The graph below illustrates the change in the General Fund financial position over the last
five years. We have also included a line representing annual expenditures to reflect the change in the size
of the General Fund operation over the same period.
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Fund Balance $14,331,635 $13,993,737 $14,320,383 $17,192,311 $18,369,854
Cash (Net)$15,923,685 $16,722,406 $15,206,793 $19,275,123 $20,557,003
Expenditures $32,196,789 $33,439,347 $34,432,954 $36,003,803 $37,949,383
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
General Fund Financial Position
Year Ended December 31,
The City’s General Fund cash and investments balance (net of interfund borrowing) at December 31,
2017 was $20,557,003. Total fund balance at December 31, 2017 was $18,369,854, which is an increase
of $1,177,543 from the prior year.
As the graph illustrates, the City has generally been able to maintain healthy cash and fund balance levels
as the volume of financial activity has grown. This is an important factor because a government, like any
organization, requires a certain amount of equity to operate. A healthy financial position allows the City
to avoid volatility in tax rates; helps minimize the impact of state funding changes; allows for the
adequate and consistent funding of services, repairs, and unexpected costs; and is a factor in determining
the City’s bond rating and resulting interest costs.
A trend that is typical to Minnesota local governments, especially the General Fund of cities, is the
unusual cash flow experienced throughout the year. The City’s General Fund cash disbursements are
made fairly evenly during the year other than the impact of seasonal services such as snowplowing, street
maintenance, and park activities. Cash receipts of the General Fund are quite a different story. Taxes
comprise about 65.4 percent of the fund’s total annual revenue. Approximately half of these revenues are
received by the City in July and the rest in December. Consequently, the City needs to have adequate cash
reserves to finance its everyday operations between these payments.
The City Council has formally adopted a fund balance policy regarding the desired range for unassigned
fund balance for the General Fund. The policy establishes a goal for unassigned General Fund balance of
42.0 percent to 47.0 percent of the subsequent year’s budgeted tax revenue. As of December 31, 2017, the
City has $15,656,518 of unassigned fund balance in the General Fund, or 54.9 percent, of 2018 budgeted
tax revenue. This amount is $2,264,772 above the goal range identified in the policy.
-10-
The following chart reflects the City’s General Fund revenue sources for 2017 compared to budget:
Other
Charges for Services
Intergovernmental
Licenses and Permits
Taxes
General Fund Revenue
Budget and Actual
Budget Actual
General Fund revenue for 2017 was $40,957,331, which was $2,307,029 (6.0 percent) greater than
budget. Licenses and permits revenue was over budget by $1,132,050, due to a continued increase in the
number of projects during the year and an increase in the number of building permits issued. Charges for
services revenue was over budget by $711,446, primarily related to outsourced police service revenues
and increased participation in parks and recreation programs that were not anticipated in the 2017 budget.
The following graph presents the City’s General Fund revenues by source for the last five years . The
graph reflects the City’s reliance on property taxes and other local sources of revenue.
Taxes Licenses and
Permits Intergovernmental Charges for
Services Fines and Forfeits Other
2013 $22,006,527 $4,122,305 $1,234,425 $3,564,341 $1,017,219 $1,372,245
2014 $22,147,135 $4,490,993 $1,197,284 $4,236,442 $993,954 $2,290,609
2015 $23,678,386 $4,827,634 $1,477,694 $4,226,690 $1,033,116 $1,364,374
2016 $25,574,720 $5,192,934 $1,398,980 $4,449,894 $946,199 $2,017,546
2017 $27,694,076 $5,324,710 $1,383,606 $4,729,419 $1,064,271 $761,249
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
General Fund Revenue by Source
Year Ended December 31,
Total General Fund revenue for 2017 was $1,377,058 (3.5 percent) higher than last year. Property taxes
increased $2,119,356 from the increased levy and collections. Other revenues decreased due to a
significant parkland dedication received in calendar 2017 not reoccurring in the current year.
-11-
The following graphs illustrate the components of General Fund spending for 2017 compared to budget:
Parks
Public Works
Public Safety
General Government
General Fund Expenditures
Budget and Actual
Budget Actual
Total General Fund expenditures for 2017 were $37,949,383, which was $750,919 (1.9 percent) under
budget. Public works expenditures were under budget by $492,860, due to employee turnover and lower
than budgeted amounts spent on street, public works equipment, and general maintenance.
The following graph presents the City’s General Fund expenditures by function for the last five years:
General
Government Public Safety Public Works Parks
2013 $5,883,436 $15,749,935 $6,690,986 $3,872,432
2014 $6,024,288 $16,462,293 $9,669,174 $1,283,592
2015 $5,771,748 $17,314,312 $9,981,474 $1,365,420
2016 $6,155,261 $18,408,651 $9,934,494 $1,505,397
2017 $6,338,153 $19,053,058 $10,877,264 $1,680,908
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
General Fund Expenditures by Function
Year Ended December 31,
Total General Fund expenditures for 2017 were $1,945,580 (5.4 percent) higher than the previous year.
Public works expenditures increased $942,770, due to increased bridge and street maintenance activity.
Public safety expenditures increased $644,407, mainly due to increased personnel expenditures.
During 2014, the City changed the allocation of expenditures between public works and parks, which can
be seen in the graph above.
-12-
ENTERPRISE FUNDS OVERVIEW
The City maintains a number of enterprise funds to account for services the City provides that are
financed primarily through fees charged to those utilizing the service. This section of the report provides
you with an overview of the financial trends and activities of the City’s enterprise funds, which include
the Utilities, Liquor, Aquatic Center, Golf Course, Arena, Art Center, Edinborough Park, Centennial
Lakes, and Sports Dome Funds.
ENTERPRISE FUNDS FINANCIAL POSITION
The following table summarizes the changes in the financial position of the City’s enterprise funds during
the year ended December 31, 2017, presented both by classification and by fund:
Increase
2017 2016 (Decrease)
Net position of enterprise funds
Total by classification
Net investment in capital assets 82,338,560$ 85,158,869$ (2,820,309)$
Restricted for debt service 1,338,276 804,393 533,883
Unrestricted 22,443,806 17,300,872 5,142,934
Total – enterprise funds 106,120,642$ 103,264,134$ 2,856,508$
Total by fund
Utilities 81,309,084$ 76,199,349$ 5,109,735$
Liquor 2,505,569 2,248,437 257,132
Aquatic Center 3,073,590 3,109,169 (35,579)
Golf Course 2,976,007 4,945,308 (1,969,301)
Arena 4,796,805 4,917,589 (120,784)
Nonmajor funds 11,459,587 11,844,282 (384,695)
Total – enterprise funds 106,120,642$ 103,264,134$ 2,856,508$
Enterprise Funds Change in Financial Position
Net Position
as of December 31,
In total, the net position of the City’s enterprise funds increased by $2,856,508 during the year ended
December 31, 2017. The increase is mainly due to positive operating results in the Utilities Fund.
-13-
UTILITIES FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Utilities Fund:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $17,830,425 $17,548,883 $19,334,023 $19,472,645 $21,360,262
Operating Expenses, Including
Interest Expense $13,873,400 $14,340,612 $15,234,135 $17,091,043 $17,701,129
Operating Income (Loss), After
Interest Expense $3,957,025 $3,208,271 $4,099,888 $2,381,602 $3,659,133
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
Utilities Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Utilities Fund ended 2017 with a net position of $81,309,084, an increase of $5,109,735 from the
prior year. Of this, $61,753,522 represents the investment in utility distribution system capital assets,
leaving $19,555,562 of unrestricted net position.
Utilities Fund operating revenue was $21,360,262 for 2017, an increase of $1,887,617, or 9.7 percent,
mostly due to increased rates and additional water and sewer connection fees. Operating expenses,
including interest expense, were $17,701,129, or 3.6 percent, more than last year, mainly due to increased
depreciation expense.
-14-
LIQUOR FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Liquor Fund:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Sales $13,711,557 $13,515,168 $12,462,387 $12,937,092 $12,991,764
Cost of Sales $9,964,763 $9,936,468 $9,415,449 $9,625,215 $9,442,254
Operating Expenses $2,299,650 $2,450,384 $2,403,153 $2,505,039 $2,536,414
Operating Income (Loss)$1,447,144 $1,128,316 $643,785 $806,838 $1,013,096
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
Liquor Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Liquor Fund ended 2017 with a net position of $2,505,569, an increase of $257,132 from the prior
year. Of the net position balance, $1,576,386 represents the investment in liquor capital assets, leaving
$929,183 of unrestricted net position.
Liquor sales for 2017 were $12,991,764, an increase of $54,672 (0.4 percent) from the previous year. The
increase in Liquor Fund sales during the current year is due to strategies to combat increased competition
in the market place combined with Sunday liquor sales starting in 2017. The Liquor Fund generated a
gross profit of $3,549,510 in 2017, or 27.3 percent of gross sales. This compares to an average gross
profit of 26.2 percent experienced over the previous five years. This increase is the result of a streamlined
inventory purchasing process in calendar 2017, which resulted in lower cost of sales. Operating expenses
for 2017 were $2,536,414, which is $31,375, or 1.3 percent, higher than last year.
-15-
AQUATIC CENTER FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Aquatic Center Fund:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $928,055 $918,412 $971,936 $956,068 $962,857
Operating Expenses, Including
Interest Expense $823,472 $828,025 $873,500 $916,099 $1,020,557
Operating Income (Loss), After
Interest Expense $104,583 $90,387 $98,436 $39,969 $(57,700)
$(200,000)
$–
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
Aquatic Center Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Aquatic Center Fund ended 2017 with a net position of $3,073,590, a decrease of $35,579 from the
prior year. Of the net position balance, $1,460,124 represents investments in Aquatic Center capital assets
and $1,338,276 restricted for debt service, leaving $275,190 of unrestricted net position.
Aquatic Center Fund operating revenues for 2017 were $962,857, which is $6,789 (0.7 percent) higher
than last year. Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2017, were $1,020,557, an increase of
$104,458 (11.4 percent) from the prior year, mainly in depreciation expense.
-16-
GOLF COURSE FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Golf Course Fund:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $2,711,743 $3,229,348 $2,857,190 $2,809,702 $1,254,412
Operating Expenses, Including
Interest Expense $3,199,962 $3,343,376 $2,943,614 $3,059,216 $2,617,586
Operating Income (Loss), After
Interest Expense $(488,219)$(114,028)$(86,424)$(249,514)$(1,363,174)
$(2,000,000)
$(1,000,000)
$–
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
Golf Course Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Golf Course Fund ended 2017 with a net position of $2,976,007, a decrease of $1,969,301 from the
prior year. Of this, $3,237,280 represents the investment in golf course land and capital assets, leaving a
deficit ($261,273) of unrestricted net position. This major decrease in net position from the previous year
is a result of losses on capital asset disposals totaling $873,839 made while the 27-hole course is closed
and under reconstruction.
Golf Course Fund operating revenues for 2016 were $1,254,412, which is $1,555,290 (55.4 percent) less
than the previous year, mainly due to the 27-hole course being closed the entire year for reconstruction.
Operating expenses, including interest expense for 2017, were $2,617,586, down $441,630 due to limited
operations resulting from the noted reconstruction. The Golf Course Fund also reported a loss on disposal
of capital assets of $897,300 related to the reconstruction at the golf course.
Due to the cash flow losses over recent years, management has developed a plan to support the operations
of this fund by making transfers from other funds. The transfer from the Liquor Fund made during 2017
totaled $200,000.
-17-
ARENA FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Arena Fund:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $1,942,971 $2,091,685 $2,307,985 $2,314,759 $2,507,019
Operating Expenses, Including
Interest Expense $2,272,494 $2,375,157 $2,642,081 $2,842,644 $2,961,771
Operating Income (Loss), After
Interest Expense $(329,523)$(283,472)$(334,096)$(527,885)$(454,752)
$(1,000,000)
$(500,000)
$–
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
Arena Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Arena Fund ended 2017 with a net position of $4,796,805, a decrease of $120,784 from the prior
year. Of this, $5,068,295 represents the investment in arena capital assets, leaving a deficit of ($271,490)
of unrestricted net position.
Arena Fund operating revenues for 2017 were $2,507,019, $192,260 more than last year. This increase
mostly relates to additional building rental in 2017. Operating expenses, including interest expense, for
2017 were $2,961,771, an increase of $119,127 from the prior year, mainly in rink and Zamboni repairs.
As the graph above illustrates, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has
been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from other funds on an annual basis.
These transfers totaled $283,887 in fiscal 2017 from the Liquor Fund and Construction Fund.
-18-
ART CENTER FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Art Center Fund:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $467,021 $480,882 $516,429 $486,229 $494,373
Operating Expenses $607,649 $654,310 $673,583 $727,822 $724,208
Operating Income (Loss)$(140,628)$(173,428)$(157,154)$(241,593)$(229,835)
$(400,000)
$(200,000)
$–
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
Art Center Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Art Center Fund ended 2017 with a net position deficit of ($113,135), a decrease of $107,584 from
the prior year. Of this, $68,439 represents the investment in capital assets, leaving a deficit ($181,574) of
unrestricted net position.
Art Center Fund operating revenues for 2017 were $494,373, $8,144 more than the prior year. Operating
expenses for 2017 were $724,208, which decreased $3,614 from the prior year.
As the graph above illustrates, this fund has continually operated at a net loss. As a result, the City has
been supporting the operations of this fund by making transfers from the Liquor Fund on an annual basis.
These transfers totaled $100,000 in fiscal 2017.
-19-
EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Edinborough Park Fund:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $1,423,056 $1,325,608 $1,336,873 $1,366,418 $1,585,971
Operating Expenses $1,415,094 $1,340,243 $1,394,373 $1,443,272 $1,525,703
Operating Income (Loss)$7,962 $(14,635)$(57,500)$(76,854)$60,268
$(200,000)
$–
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
$1,800,000
Edinborough Park Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Edinborough Park Fund ended 2017 with a net position of $2,595,912, an increase of $176,632 from
the prior year. Of this, $959,959 represents the net investment in capital assets, leaving $1,635,953 of
unrestricted net position.
Edinborough Park Fund operating revenues for 2017 were $1,585,971, which was $219,553, or
16.1 percent, more than fiscal year 2016. This increase was mainly in admission and class registration
fees. Operating expenses also increased $82,431, or 5.7 percent, from fiscal year 2016.
-20-
CENTENNIAL LAKES FUND
The following graph presents five years of operating results for the Centennial Lakes Fund:
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $735,556 $758,893 $801,023 $939,421 $778,408
Operating Expenses $944,372 $966,266 $971,777 $1,011,551 $1,019,339
Operating Income (Loss)$(208,816)$(207,373)$(170,754)$(72,130)$(240,931)
$(400,000)
$(200,000)
$–
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
Centennial Lakes Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Centennial Lakes Fund ended 2017 with a net position of $557,393, a decrease of $123,692 from the
prior year. Of this, $215,899 represents the net investment in capital assets, leaving $341,494 of
unrestricted net position.
Centennial Lakes Fund operating revenues for 2017 were $778,408, which was $161,013, or 17.1 percent,
lower than the prior year, mainly in class registration and other fees. Operating expenses increased
$7,788, or 0.8 percent.
-21-
SPORTS DOME FUND
The following graph presents three years of operating results for the Sports Dome Fund:
2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $465,464 $398,707 $489,876
Operating Expenses $396,592 $670,446 $825,261
Operating Income (Loss)$68,872 $(271,739)$(335,385)
$(400,000)
$(200,000)
$–
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
Sports Dome Fund
Year Ended December 31,
The Sports Dome Fund was established by the City starting in fiscal 2014 and began limited operations in
late 2014. Of the $8,419,417 total net position at year-end, $7,998,656 represents the investment in capital
assets, leaving $420,761 of unrestricted net position.
The Sports Dome Fund had operating revenues for 2017 of $489,876, which was $91,169 higher than the
prior year. Operating expenses of $825,261 were $154,815 higher than the prior year due to increased
depreciation. Depreciation expense for 2017 was $511,577, which accounts for 62 percent of the
operating expense in this fund.
-22-
GOVERNMENT-WIDE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In addition to fund-based information, the current reporting model for governmental entities also requires
the inclusion of two government -wide financial statements designed to present a clear picture of the City
as a single, unified entity. These government-wide financial statements provide information on the total
cost of delivering services, including capital assets and long-term liabilities.
STATEMENT OF NET POSITION
The Statement of Net Position essentially tells you what the City owns and owes at a given point in time,
the last day of the fiscal year. Theoretically, net position represents the resources the City has leftover to
use for providing services after its debts are settled. However, those resources are not always in spendable
form, or there may be restrictions on how some of those resources can be used. Therefore, net position is
divided into three components: net investment in capital assets, restricted, and unrestricted.
The following table presents the components of the City’s net position as of December 31, 2017 and
2016, for governmental activities and business-type activities:
Increase
2017 2016 (Decrease)
Net position
Governmental activities
Net investment in capital assets 96,149,011$ 89,415,993$ 6,733,018$
Restricted 22,840,869 24,724,660 (1,883,791)
Unrestricted 26,412,441 22,146,168 4,266,273
Total governmental activities 145,402,321 136,286,821 9,115,500
Business-type activities
Net investment in capital assets 82,338,560 85,158,869 (2,820,309)
Restricted 1,338,276 804,393 533,883
Unrestricted 22,443,806 17,300,872 5,142,934
Total business-type activities 106,120,642 103,264,134 2,856,508
Total net position 251,522,963$ 239,550,955$ 11,972,008$
As of December 31,
The City’s total net position at December 31, 2017 was $12.0 million higher than the previous year-end.
Of the increase, $9.1 million came from governmental activities and $2.9 million came from
business-type activities. Net investment in capital assets increased in the governmental activities due to
significant capital projects occurring in the fiscal year . The decline in business-type net investment in
capital assets mostly relates to renovation activity at the golf course . The increase in the unrestricted net
position in the governmental activities relates to positive operating results in the General and HRA funds
in 2017. The increase in unrestricted net position in the business-type activities relates to positive
operating results in the Utilities Fund.
-23-
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
The Statement of Activities tracks the City’s yearly revenues and expenses, as well as any other
transactions that increase or reduce total net position. These amounts represent the full cost of providing
services. The Statement of Activities provides a more comprehensive measure than just the amount of
cash that changed hands, as reflected in the fund-based financial statements. This statement includes the
cost of supplies used, depreciation of long-lived capital assets, and other accrual-based expenses.
The following table presents the change in net position of the City for the years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016:
2016
Program
Expenses Revenues Net Change Net Change
Net (expense) revenue
Governmental activities
General government 9,164,272$ 1,838,016$ (7,326,256)$ (4,956,712)$
Public safety 21,815,101 10,902,033 (10,913,068) (9,936,402)
Public works 17,750,505 10,370,657 (7,379,848) (7,209,156)
Parks and recreation 4,222,431 916,508 (3,305,923) (1,252,513)
Interest on long-term debt 1,996,354 – (1,996,354) (2,133,474)
Business-type activities
Utilities 17,361,659 22,405,715 5,044,056 3,070,528
Liquor 12,007,885 13,000,875 992,990 818,188
Aquatic Center 1,015,328 962,857 (52,471) 70,508
Golf course 3,469,121 1,254,412 (2,214,709) (214,485)
Arena 2,961,787 2,508,242 (453,545) (525,255)
Community activity centers 4,095,309 3,379,011 (716,298) (622,794)
Total net (expense) revenue 95,859,752$ 67,538,326$ (28,321,426) (22,891,567)
General revenues
Property taxes and tax increments 37,087,927 34,175,518
Franchise and lodging taxes 2,429,890 2,369,047
Unrestricted investment earnings 769,063 480,485
Gain on disposal of capital assets 6,554 100,990
Total general revenues 40,293,434 37,126,040
11,972,008 14,234,473
Net position – beginning 239,550,955 225,316,482
Net position – ending 251,522,963$ 239,550,955$
2017
Change in net position
One of the goals of this statement is to provide a side-by-side comparison to illustrate the difference in the
way the City’s governmental and business-type operations are financed. The table clearly illustrates the
dependence of the City’s governmental operations on general revenues, such as property taxes and
unrestricted grants. It also shows if the City’s business-type activities are generating sufficient program
revenues (service charges and program-specific grants) to cover expenses. This is critical given the
current downward pressures on the general revenue sources.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-24-
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES
The 2017 legislative session began with a full agenda, which included adopting a fiscal year 2018–2019
biennial state budget. The February 2017, state budget forecast projected that the state General Fund
would end the 2016–2017 biennium with a surplus of $743 million, eliminating the need for budget cuts
or transfers to balance the fund. However, the Legislature was expected to address several significant
spending areas for which successful funding appropriations had not been passed in recent legislative
sessions. The 2017 regular legislative session ended with four omnibus budget bills being vetoed,
potentially leaving a number of these same areas without appropriations. After a three-day special session,
the Governor and Legislature were able to agree on budget and appropriation bills addressing most of the
state budgetary needs for the upcoming biennium, albeit not without several line item vetoes invoked by
the Governor, including striking the appropriations for operating the House and Senate from the bills.
The following is a summary of recent legislation affecting Minnesota cities:
Omnibus Bonding Bill – The omnibus bonding bill authorizes financing for approximately $1.1 billion
in capital improvements. Included in the approved funding was $255 million for transportation
infrastructure, $83 million for economic development, $116 million for Public Financing Agency water
infrastructure loans and grants to municipalities, and $4 million for Metropolitan Council inflow and
infiltration improvement grants to metro area cities.
Omnibus Transportation Bill – The omnibus transportation bill appropriates $2.95 billion in fiscal 2018
and $2.87 billion in fiscal 2019, for a wide variety of transportation related projects. Included in the
appropriations are approximately $191 million and $198 million for municipal state aid street fund
purposes in fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2019, respectively.
Property Tax Relief – The omnibus tax bill contained a number of property tax relief measures,
including:
• Elimination of the implicit price deflator annual increase for the state general property tax
levy, effectively freezing it at the payable 2018 level for many property classes;
• Exempting the first $100,000 of each commercial-industrial parcel’s tax capacity from the
state general property tax levy;
• Expanding eligibility for homestead or agricultural property classification exemptions for
certain types of resort and conservation property for general property taxes; and
• Increasing the minimum value for a storage shed, deck, or similar structure on a leased
mobile home to be considered taxable from $1,000 to $10,000.
Local Government Aid – The annual appropriation for Local Government Aid (LGA) for cities was
increased $15.0 million to $534.4 million for aid payable in 2018 and thereafter, and the LGA payment
schedule was accelerated for fiscal 2019 only. Several corrections were also made to the city LGA
formula calculation, and a sparsity adjustment was incorporated for certain medium and small cities
beginning in 2018.
Minnesota Investment Fund – The omnibus jobs and economic growth bill appropriates $12.5 million
for each year of the biennium for the Minnesota Investment Fund, which is available for municipalities to
provide loans to assist with the expansion of local businesses.
Electronic Funds Transfers – Effective August 1, 2017, home rule charter cities of the second, third, or
fourth class are added to the list of local government entities allowed to pay certain claims using
electronic funds transfers. To be eligible, local governments must enact specified policy controls
governing the initiation, authorization, and documentation of electronic funds transfers.
Claims Declaration – The requirement to obtain a specific form of written claim declaration was also
repealed based on the understanding that by making the claim, the party making the claim is declaring
that the claim is just and correct and has not been paid previously.
-25-
City E-mail Address Required to Receive State Aid – Effective for state aids payable in 2018 and
thereafter, cities will be required to register an official e-mail address with the Commissioner of the state
Department of Revenue in order to receive state aid payments.
Workforce Housing Tax Increment Financing – The omnibus tax bill created a new authorized use of
tax increment financing (TIF), for workforce housing in cities located outside of the statutorily defined
metropolitan area that meet certain criteria.
Tax Increment Financing Interfund Loans – Interfund loan provisions for TIF were amended to make
it easier for cities and development authorities to make and document interfund loans. Loans may now be
made or documented up to 60 days after the actual transfer or expenditure occurs. Interfund loan
resolutions may now be passed prior to the final approval of the related TIF plan. Loan terms may be
amended after the loan has been made if the TIF district has not been decertified.
Public Debt – The Legislature passed several amendments to statutes governing public debt that took
effect on July 1, 2017, including:
• Allowing both home rule charter and statutory cities to issue 20-year capital notes for projects
to eliminate R-22 Freon-based refrigerant;
• Increasing the maximum dollar limit on Housing and Redevelopment Authority general
obligation bond issues from $3 million to $5 million; and
• Modifying the requirements for street reconstruction bonds to be approved by a two -thirds
majority of the governing body rather than requiring unanimous approval.
Local Housing Trust Funds – The omnibus jobs and economic growth appropriations bill established
authority for cities to create a local housing trust fund by ordinance, or to participate in a joint powers
agreement to establish a regional housing trust fund. The funds, which may be financed from sources such
as local government appropriations or housing and redevelopment authority levies, may be used for grants
or loans for development, rehabilitation, financing of housing to match federal or state or private funds for
housing, down payment assistance, rental assistance, or homebuyer counseling.
Long-Term Equity Investment Authority – Effective July 1, 2017, cities with a population of more
than 100,000 or those that had their most recently issued general obligation bonds rated in the highest
category, are authorized to invest in an expanded list of authorized investments that includes certain
equity-based investments. The amount invested in equity-based investments cannot exceed 15 percent of
the sum of a city’s assigned cash, cash equivalents, deposits, and investments. Before investing in the
expanded list of authorized investments, the governing body of the municipality must adopt a resolution
acknowledging the risks assumed.
Border-to-Border Broadband Grants – The Legislature appropriated $20 million in fiscal 2018 for the
Border-to-Border Broadband Grant Program. The grants, available through the Office of Broadband
Development in the Department of Employment and Economic Development, provide funding to help
communities meet state goals for the development of state-wide, high-speed broadband access, focusing
on areas currently considered to be underserved or with a high concentration of low-income households.
Elections – An omnibus elections law was passed making several modifications to election
administration, including: requiring special elections conducted by local governments be held on one of
five uniform election dates, clarifying the timeline for municipalities to change from odd to even-year
election cycles or vise-versa, allowing municipalities to canvass the results of a primary election on the
second or third day after the primary, and appropriating $7 million for grants to replace aging e lection
equipment or purchase electronic poll books.
-26-
Workers’ Compensation and PERA Retirement Benefits – A statutory change was adopted based on
the results of recent court rulings that Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) reti rement
benefits should not be offset against workers’ compensation permanent total disability benefits. Under the
new law, claimants would receive all past and future permanent and total disability benefits without a
PERA retirement offset.
Notice of Proposed Ordinances – A new statute was created requiring cities to provide a 10-day notice
prior to a scheduled final vote on most new proposed ordinances or amendments to ordinances, and
specifying the various acceptable means of providing the required notification.
State Building Code Applicability – Construction, additions, and alterations to places of public
accommodation; defined as publicly or privately-owned facilities designed for occupancy by 200 or more
people as a sports or entertainment arena, stadium, theater, community or convention hall, special event
center, indoor amusement facility or water park, or indoor swimming pool; must comply with the state
building code.
Sunday Liquor Sales – Minnesota Statutes were amended to allow for the sale of i ntoxicating liquor on
Sundays between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. by off-sale licensees, effective July 1, 2017.
REAL ID Act – Minnesota Statutes were amended to make the state compliant with federal REAL ID
Act requirements, which will change identity verification and security related to state-issued identification
cards and driver’s licenses.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-27-
ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING UPDATES
GASB STATEMENT NO. 75, ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING FOR POSTEMPLOYMENT
BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS
GASB Statement No. 75, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Postemployment Benefits Other Than
Pensions, establishes new accounting and financial reporting requirements for governments whose
employees are provided with other post-employment benefits (OPEB), as well as for certain nonemployer
governments that have a legal obligation to provide financial support for OPEB provided to the
employees of other entities. This statement replaces the requirements of GASB Statement Nos. 45 and 57.
This statement establishes standards for recognizing and measuring liabilities, deferred outflows of
resources, deferred inflows of resources, and expense/expenditures. Similar to changes implemented for
pensions, this statement requires the liability of employer and nonemployer contributing entities to
employees for defined benefit OPEB (net OPEB liability) to be measured as the portion of the present
value of projected benefit payments to be provided to current active and inactive employees that is
attributed to those employees’ past periods of service (total OPEB liability), less the amount of the OPEB
plan’s fiduciary net position. Note disclosure and RSI requirements about defined benefit OPEB also are
addressed.
The requirements for this statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2017. Earlier
application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 83, CERTAIN ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
This statement addresses accounting and financial reporting for certain asset retirement obligations
(ARO), which are legally enforceable liabilities associated with the retirement of a tangible capital asset.
This statement establishes criteria for determining the timing and pattern of recognition of a liability and a
corresponding deferred outflow of resources for ARO. A government that has legal obligations to perform
future asset retirement activities related to its tangible capital assets should recognize a liability when it is
both incurred and reasonably estimable. The measurement of an ARO is req uired to be based on the best
estimate of the current value of outlays expected to be incurred, and a deferred outflow of resources
associated with an ARO is required to be measured at the amount of the corresponding liability upon
initial measurement.
This statement requires the current value of a government’s AROs to be adjusted for the effects of general
inflation or deflation at least annually, and a government to evaluate all relevant factors at least annually
to determine whether the effects of one or more of the factors are expected to significantly change the
estimated asset retirement outlays. A government should remeasure an ARO only when the result of the
evaluation indicates there is a significant change in the estimated outlays. Deferred outflows of resources
should be reduced and recognized as outflows of resources in a systematic and rational manner over the
estimated useful life of the tangible capital asset.
If a government owns a minority interest in a jointly owned tangible asset where a nongovernmental
entity is the majority owner or has operational responsibility for the jointly owned asset, the government’s
minority share of an ARO should be reported using the measurement produced by the nongovernmental
majority owner or the nongovernmental minority owner that has operational responsibility, without
adjustment to conform to the liability measurement and recognition requirements of this statement.
-28-
The statement also requires disclosures of any funding or financial assurance requirements a government
has related to the performance of asset retirement activities, along with any assets restricted for the
payment of the government’s AROs. This statement also requires disclosure of information about the
nature of a government’s AROs, the methods and assumptions used for the estimates of the liabilities, and
the estimated remaining useful life of the associated tangible capital assets. If an ARO (or portions
thereof) has been incurred by a government but is not yet recognized because it is not reasonably
estimable, the government is required to disclose that fact and the reasons therefor. This statement
requires similar disclosures for a government’s minority shares of AROs.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2018.
Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 84, FIDUCIARY ACTIVITIES
This statement establishes criteria for identifying fiduciary activities of all state and local governments.
The focus of the criteria generally is on (1) whether a government is controlling the assets of the fiduciary
activity and (2) the beneficiaries with whom a fiduciary relationship exists. Separate criteria are included
to identify fiduciary component units and post-employment benefit arrangements that are fiduciary
activities.
An activity meeting the criteria should be reported in a fiduciary fund in the basic financial statements,
which should present a statement of fiduciary net position and a statement of changes in fiduciary net
position. This statement describes four fiduciary funds that should be reported, if applicable: (1) pension
(and other employee benefit) trust funds, (2) investment trust funds, (3) private -purpose trust funds, and
(4) custodial funds. Custodial funds generally should report fiduciary activities that are not held in a trust
or equivalent arrangement that meets specific criteria.
A fiduciary component unit, when reported in the fiduciary fund financial statements of a primary
government, should combine its information with its component units that are fiduciary component units
and aggregate that combined information with the primary government’s fiduciary funds.
This statement also provides for recognition of a liability to the beneficiaries in a fiduciary fund when an
event has occurred that compels the government to disburse fiduciary resources, defined as when a
demand for the resources has been made or when no further action, approval, or condition is required to
be taken or met by the beneficiary to release the assets.
The requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018.
Earlier application is encouraged.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 85, OMNIBUS 2017
The objective of this statement is to address issues that have been identified during implementation and
application of certain GASB statements. The statement addresses a variety of topics, including issues
related to blending component units, goodwill, fair value measurement and application, and
post-employment benefits (pensions and OPEB). The statement is meant to enhance consistency in the
application of recent accounting and financial reporting standards. The requirements of this statement are
effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2017.
-29-
GASB STATEMENT NO. 86, CERTAIN DEBT EXTINGUISHMENT ISSUES
Current GASB guidance requires that debt be considered defeased in substance when the debtor
irrevocably places cash or other monetary assets acquired with refunding debt proceeds in a trust to be
used solely for satisfying scheduled payments of both principal and interest of the defeased debt. This
new standard establishes essentially the same requirements for when a government places cash and other
monetary assets acquired with only existing resources in an irrevocable trust to extinguish the debt.
The primary objective of this statement is to improve consistency in accounting and financial reporting
for in-substance defeasance of debt by providing guidance for transactions in which cash and other
monetary assets acquired with only existing resources—resources other than the proceeds of refunding
debt—are placed in an irrevocable trust for the sole purpose of extinguishing debt. This statement also
improves accounting and financial reporting for prepaid insurance on debt that is extinguished and notes
to financial statements for debt that is defeased in substance. The requirements of this statement are
effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2017.
GASB STATEMENT NO. 87, LEASES
A lease is a contract that transfers control of the right to use another entity’s nonfinancial asset as
specified in the contract for a period of time in an exchange or exchange -like transaction. Examples of
nonfinancial assets include buildings, land, vehicles, and equipment. Any contract that meets this
definition should be accounted for under the leases guidance, unless specifically excluded in this
statement.
Governments enter into leases for many types of assets. Under the previous guidance, leases were
classified as either capital or operating depending on whether the lease met any of four tests. In many
cases, the previous guidance resulted in reporting lease transactions differently than similar nonlease
financing transactions.
The goal of this statement is to better meet the information needs of users by improving accounting and
financial reporting for leases by governments. It establishes a single model for lease accounting based on
the principle that leases are financings of the right to use an underlying asset. This statement increases the
usefulness of financial statements by requiring recognition of certain lease assets and liabilities for leases
that previously were classified as operating leases and recognized as inflows of resources or outflows of
resources based on the payment provisions of the contract.
Under this statement, a lessee is required to recognize a lease liability and an intangible right -to-use lease
asset, and a lessor is required to recognize a lease receivable and a deferred inflow of resources, thereby
enhancing the relevance and consistency of information about governments’ leasing activities.
To reduce the cost of implementation, this statement includes an exception for short -term leases, defined
as a lease that, at the commencement of the lease term, has a maximum possible term under the lease
contract of 12 months (or less), including any options to extend, regardless of their probability of being
exercised. Lessees and lessors should recognize short-term lease payments as outflows of resources or
inflows of resources, respectively, based on the payment provisions of the lease contract. The
requirements of this statement are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Special Purpose Audit Reports
Year Ended
December 31, 2017
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Page
Independent Auditor’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial
Statements Performed in Accordance With Government Auditing Standards 1–2
Independent Auditor’s Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 3
Schedule of Findings and Responses 4
Table of Contents
CITY OF EDINA
Year Ended December 31, 2017
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
-1-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of
the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the related
notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and
have issued our report thereon dated June 6, 2018.
INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the City’s internal control
over financial reporting (internal control) to determine the audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the financial statements, but not for the
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control. Accordingly, we do
not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal control.
A deficiency in internal control exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow
management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent, or
detect and correct, misstatements on a timely basis. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination
of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the City’s financial statements will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis. A
significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control that is less
severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged with
governance.
Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this
section and was not designed to identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be material
weaknesses or significant deficiencies. Given these limitations, during our audit we did not identify any
deficiencies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses. However, material weaknesses
may exist that have not been identified.
(continued)
-2-
COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City’s financial statements are free from
material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the
determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those
provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The
results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be
reported under Government Auditing Standards.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control and compliance
and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City’s internal
control or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with
Government Auditing Standards in considering the City’s internal control and compliance. Accordingly,
this report is not suitable for any other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 6, 2018
-3-
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
To the City Council and Management
City of Edina, Minnesota
We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards,
issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental
activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of
the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the related
notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements, and
have issued our report thereon dated June 6, 2018.
MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE
The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding,
deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements,
miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our audit considered all of the listed categories.
In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to
comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Cities, except as
described in the Schedule of Findings and Responses as item 2017-001. However, our audit was not
directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed
additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City’s noncompliance
with the above referenced provisions.
CITY’S RESPONSE TO FINDING
The City’s response to the legal compliance finding identified in our audit ha s been included in the
Schedule of Findings and Responses. The City’s response was not subject to the auditing procedures
applied in our audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it.
PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of
that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this report is not suitable for any
other purpose.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 6, 2018
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF EDINA
Schedule of Findings and Responses
Year Ended December 31, 2017
-4-
A. FINDINGS – MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE AUDIT
2017-1 PAYMENT OF INVOICES
Criteria – Minnesota Statutes § 471.425, Subd. 2.
Condition – Minnesota Statutes require prompt payment of local government bills within a
standard payment period of 35 days from the receipt of goods and services for governing boards
that meet at least once a month. Two disbursements tested were not paid within the statutory time
limit.
Context – Two of twenty-five disbursements tested were not in compliance. This is a current year
finding.
Cause – This was an oversight by city personnel.
Effect – Certain payments made to vendors were not paid within the timeframe as required by
state statutes.
Recommendation – We recommend that the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) review current
procedures in place to ensure that all invoices are paid within statutory requirements.
Corrective Action Plan
Actions Planned – The City will review the procedures in place to ensure future compliance
with the statutes.
Official Responsible – The Assistant Finance Director.
Planned Completion Date – June 30, 2018.
Disagreement With or Explanation of Finding – The City is in agreement with this
finding.
Plan to Monitor – The Assistant Finance Director will review invoices on a monthly basis to
ensure invoice payments are made in a timely manner.
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
CITY OF EDINA
AUDIT REPORT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
James H. Eichten, CPA
Opinion on Financial Statements
Financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
Internal Controls and Compliance
Proper internal controls over financial reporting
Compliance with laws and regulations related to financial reporting
State Laws and Regulations
Compliance with Minnesota state laws and regulations
Single Audit of Federal Awards
Not required for 2017
AUDITOR’S ROLE
Opinion on Financial Statements
Unmodified or “clean” opinion
Internal Controls and Compliance
No findings
State Laws and Regulations
One finding
Timely Payment of Invoices
AUDIT RESULTS
Audit Summary
Planned scope and timing of audit
Formal required communications
MANAGEMENT REPORT
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$2,000,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$8,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000
$12,000,000,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Taxable Market Value
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Tax Rates
2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Average tax rate
City 46.9 46.5 43.4 43.0 26.6 27.1 28.2
County 44.7 44.1 42.9 42.3 46.4 45.4 44.1
School 27.1 27.5 28.3 28.6 27.4 33.7 34.8
Special taxing 6.9 6.9 8.8 8.7 11.3 10.9 11.0
Total 125.6 125.0 123.4 122.6 111.7 117.2 118.1
Note: State-wide and metro area average tax rates are not available for 2017.
Rates Expressed as a Percentage of Net Tax Capacity
City of EdinaMetro Area
Seven-CountyAll Cities
State-Wide
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Year 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 50,766 51,804 51,804
Property taxes 443$ 455$ 582$ 605$ 650$
Tax increments 37 42 35 54 66
Franchise taxes 39 45 42 46 47
Special assessments 59 59 81 102 103
Licenses and permits 43 42 97 102 104
Intergovernmental revenues 156 152 120 111 71
Charges for services 94 103 87 91 95
Other 58 54 58 111 56
Total revenue 929$ 952$ 1,102$ 1,222$ 1,192$
Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
City of EdinaState-Wide
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Year 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 50,766 51,804 51,804
Current
89$ 97$ 125$ 132$ 136$
261 273 345 358 371
99 95 208 202 222
94 95 28 30 33
89 91 – – –
Total current 632$ 651$ 706$ 722$ 762$
Capital outlay
and construction 286$ 301$ 392$ 324$ 213$
Debt service
117$ 115$ 262$ 101$ 106$
33 34 47 46 46
150$ 149$ 309$ 147$ 152$
General government
City of EdinaState-Wide
Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
Total debt service
Interest and fiscal charges
Public safety
Streets and highways
Parks and recreation
All other
Principal
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Fund Balance $14,331,635 $13,993,737 $14,320,383 $17,192,311 $18,369,854
Cash (Net)$15,923,685 $16,722,406 $15,206,793 $19,275,123 $20,557,003
Expenditures $32,196,789 $33,439,347 $34,432,954 $36,003,803 $37,949,383
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
General Fund Financial Position
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Taxes Licenses and
Permits Intergovernmental Charges for
Services Fines and Forfeits Other
2013 $22,006,527 $4,122,305 $1,234,425 $3,564,341 $1,017,219 $1,372,245
2014 $22,147,135 $4,490,993 $1,197,284 $4,236,442 $993,954 $2,290,609
2015 $23,678,386 $4,827,634 $1,477,694 $4,226,690 $1,033,116 $1,364,374
2016 $25,574,720 $5,192,934 $1,398,980 $4,449,894 $946,199 $2,017,546
2017 $27,694,076 $5,324,710 $1,383,606 $4,729,419 $1,064,271 $761,249
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
General Fund Revenue by Source
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks
2013 $5,883,436 $15,749,935 $6,690,986 $3,872,432
2014 $6,024,288 $16,462,293 $9,669,174 $1,283,592
2015 $5,771,748 $17,314,312 $9,981,474 $1,365,420
2016 $6,155,261 $18,408,651 $9,934,494 $1,505,397
2017 $6,338,153 $19,053,058 $10,877,264 $1,680,908
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
General Fund Expenditures by Function
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $17,830,425 $17,548,883 $19,334,023 $19,472,645 $21,360,262
Operating Expenses, Including
Interest Expense $13,873,400 $14,340,612 $15,234,135 $17,091,043 $17,701,129
Operating Income (Loss), After
Interest Expense $3,957,025 $3,208,271 $4,099,888 $2,381,602 $3,659,133
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
Utilities Fund
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Sales $13,711,557 $13,515,168 $12,462,387 $12,937,092 $12,991,764
Cost of Sales $9,964,763 $9,936,468 $9,415,449 $9,625,215 $9,442,254
Operating Expenses $2,299,650 $2,450,384 $2,403,153 $2,505,039 $2,536,414
Operating Income (Loss)$1,447,144 $1,128,316 $643,785 $806,838 $1,013,096
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
Liquor Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
Legislative Updates
Accounting and Auditing Updates
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Clean Opinion on Basic Financial Statements
No Findings in Internal Controls and
Compliance Testing and One Finding in the
Minnesota Legal Compliance Testing
City is experiencing Continued Improvement in
Overall Financial Results
Noted Continued Ongoing Assessment of
Financial Projections and Results, Including
General, Other Operational, and Enterprise
Fund Activities
Financial Records in Excellent Condition
SUMMARY
CITY OF EDINA
AUDIT REPORT
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
James H. Eichten, CPA
Opinion on Financial Statements
Financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
Internal Controls and Compliance
Proper internal controls over financial reporting
Compliance with laws and regulations related to financial reporting
State Laws and Regulations
Compliance with Minnesota state laws and regulations
Single Audit of Federal Awards
Not required for 2017
AUDITOR’S ROLE
Opinion on Financial Statements
Unmodified or “clean” opinion
Internal Controls and Compliance
No findings
State Laws and Regulations
One finding
Timely Payment of Invoices
AUDIT RESULTS
Audit Summary
Planned scope and timing of audit
Formal required communications
MANAGEMENT REPORT
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
$–
$2,000,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$6,000,000,000
$8,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000
$12,000,000,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Taxable Market Value
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Tax Rates
2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Average tax rate
City 46.9 46.5 43.4 43.0 26.6 27.1 28.2
County 44.7 44.1 42.9 42.3 46.4 45.4 44.1
School 27.1 27.5 28.3 28.6 27.4 33.7 34.8
Special taxing 6.9 6.9 8.8 8.7 11.3 10.9 11.0
Total 125.6 125.0 123.4 122.6 111.7 117.2 118.1
Note: State-wide and metro area average tax rates are not available for 2017.
Rates Expressed as a Percentage of Net Tax Capacity
City of EdinaMetro Area
Seven-CountyAll Cities
State-Wide
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Year 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 50,766 51,804 51,804
Property taxes 443$ 455$ 582$ 605$ 650$
Tax increments 37 42 35 54 66
Franchise taxes 39 45 42 46 47
Special assessments 59 59 81 102 103
Licenses and permits 43 42 97 102 104
Intergovernmental revenues 156 152 120 111 71
Charges for services 94 103 87 91 95
Other 58 54 58 111 56
Total revenue 929$ 952$ 1,102$ 1,222$ 1,192$
Governmental Funds Revenue per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
City of EdinaState-Wide
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Year 2015 2016 2015 2016 2017
Population 20,000–100,000 20,000–100,000 50,766 51,804 51,804
Current
89$ 97$ 125$ 132$ 136$
261 273 345 358 371
99 95 208 202 222
94 95 28 30 33
89 91 – – –
Total current 632$ 651$ 706$ 722$ 762$
Capital outlay
and construction 286$ 301$ 392$ 324$ 213$
Debt service
117$ 115$ 262$ 101$ 106$
33 34 47 46 46
150$ 149$ 309$ 147$ 152$
General government
City of EdinaState-Wide
Governmental Funds Expenditures per Capita
With State-Wide Averages by Population Class
Total debt service
Interest and fiscal charges
Public safety
Streets and highways
Parks and recreation
All other
Principal
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Fund Balance $14,331,635 $13,993,737 $14,320,383 $17,192,311 $18,369,854
Cash (Net)$15,923,685 $16,722,406 $15,206,793 $19,275,123 $20,557,003
Expenditures $32,196,789 $33,439,347 $34,432,954 $36,003,803 $37,949,383
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000
General Fund Financial Position
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Taxes Licenses and
Permits Intergovernmental Charges for
Services Fines and Forfeits Other
2013 $22,006,527 $4,122,305 $1,234,425 $3,564,341 $1,017,219 $1,372,245
2014 $22,147,135 $4,490,993 $1,197,284 $4,236,442 $993,954 $2,290,609
2015 $23,678,386 $4,827,634 $1,477,694 $4,226,690 $1,033,116 $1,364,374
2016 $25,574,720 $5,192,934 $1,398,980 $4,449,894 $946,199 $2,017,546
2017 $27,694,076 $5,324,710 $1,383,606 $4,729,419 $1,064,271 $761,249
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
General Fund Revenue by Source
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
General Government Public Safety Public Works Parks
2013 $5,883,436 $15,749,935 $6,690,986 $3,872,432
2014 $6,024,288 $16,462,293 $9,669,174 $1,283,592
2015 $5,771,748 $17,314,312 $9,981,474 $1,365,420
2016 $6,155,261 $18,408,651 $9,934,494 $1,505,397
2017 $6,338,153 $19,053,058 $10,877,264 $1,680,908
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
General Fund Expenditures by Function
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Operating Revenue $17,830,425 $17,548,883 $19,334,023 $19,472,645 $21,360,262
Operating Expenses, Including
Interest Expense $13,873,400 $14,340,612 $15,234,135 $17,091,043 $17,701,129
Operating Income (Loss), After
Interest Expense $3,957,025 $3,208,271 $4,099,888 $2,381,602 $3,659,133
$–
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
Utilities Fund
Year Ended December 31,
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Sales $13,711,557 $13,515,168 $12,462,387 $12,937,092 $12,991,764
Cost of Sales $9,964,763 $9,936,468 $9,415,449 $9,625,215 $9,442,254
Operating Expenses $2,299,650 $2,450,384 $2,403,153 $2,505,039 $2,536,414
Operating Income (Loss)$1,447,144 $1,128,316 $643,785 $806,838 $1,013,096
$–
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
Liquor Fund
Year Ended December 31,
Audit Summary
Property Taxes
Governmental Funds Overview
Enterprise Funds Overview
Legislative Updates
Accounting and Auditing Updates
MANAGEMENT REPORT (CONT.)
Clean Opinion on Basic Financial Statements
No Findings in Internal Controls and
Compliance Testing and One Finding in the
Minnesota Legal Compliance Testing
City is experiencing Continued Improvement in
Overall Financial Results
Noted Continued Ongoing Assessment of
Financial Projections and Results, Including
General, Other Operational, and Enterprise
Fund Activities
Financial Records in Excellent Condition
SUMMARY
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
O ther
F rom:Kaylin Eidsnes s , S enior C ommunications
C oordinator Item Activity:
Subject:S peak Up, Edina!: O n-S treet P arking Information
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
No action required.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
S ince J une 2012, the City of E dina has used the online engagement website, S peakU pEdina.org, to collect ideas
and opinions from residents. Since January 2014, organized monthly discussions have been held on the site.
T he May 2018 conversation focused on on-street parking. T he E ngineering, P olice and P ublic Works department
were looking for feedback on the City’s street parking ordinance, as it’s been many years since it’s been
reevaluated. P er Chapter 26 of the C ity C ode, no one can park a vehicle for more than six consecutive hours on a
street unless in areas designated by signs or if the driver is actively engaged in performing services. It also states
from Nov. 1 to M arch 31, no one can park on any street from 1 a.m. to 6 a.m.
I n this conversation, the City asked:
Other than the seasonal parking restrictions, did you know there was a six-hour parking limit on C ity
streets?
S hould the City consider changing the six-hour time limit to a shorter limit, a longer limit or no limit at all.
Why do you feel that way?
S tudents and participants in P arks & R ecreation events sometimes use all the available parking spots in an
area, so residents are unable to use them. S hould there be specific parking restrictions around schools and
parks? (i.e., No P arking 8 a.m.-4 p.m. Monday through Friday.) K eep in mind, residents would also not be
able to park on the streets in the specified areas during those dates and times either.
W hat are your biggest concerns with parking on City streets? Any suggestions to improve them?
T he discussion was open for comments between April 30 and M ay 31. D uring that time, 127 comments were
made and the site was viewed 5,403 times.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
On-Street Parking Dis cussion
Speak Up Edina Presentation
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
68 4 127 9 85
PARTICIPANTS TOPICS ANSWERS REPLIES VOTES
SUMMARY OF TOPICS
SIX-HOUR PARKING LIMIT 42 Answers · 1 Replies
Other than the seasonal parking restrictions, did you know there was a six-
hour parking limit on City streets?
Paul Juhl · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 05, 2018 7:28 am
5 Votes
As with many posters I have lived in Edina for years and have never heard of this rule. I
live on an alley with no driveway so on street parking is very important, particularly for
guests who sometimes stay for several days. This rule should be dropped as I don't see
a good reason for it in most areas. If there are issues around schools or businesses, for
example, I can understand further discussion and possible restrictions in those areas.
Kaylin Eidsness · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 07, 2018 1:48 pm
17 Votes
[Comment from Joel Stegner] I have lived in Edina since 1985, served on board and
faithfully read everything I see including you website and online alerts. I was unaware
of the 6 hour limit and never heard of any enforcement action. The seasonal parking
and overnight parking bans are prominently communicated each year and I know they
are enforced.
Such unknown and unenforced bans should be eliminated. I can see them to being used
selectively to punish a unliked neighbor or a racial minority, which only makes the police
look bad. Making police come off as bad guys is another reason for drop it.
Beth Psihos · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 11:27 am
9 Votes
I did not know this. I am aware of the seasonal and no overnight parking. I think this is
not needed, and since they recently started enforcing this around the high school, the
kids can no longer park on the streets. This was due to neighbor complaints, but you
bought a house by a high school. Unless there are actual violations other than having
cars parked, I don't think this is a fair way to solve the issue.
1 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
Doug Haining · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 11:34 am
15 Votes
I think the 6 hour limit should be removed. It's pointless. If a limit is needed, make it 6
days or something longer term. If I have a house guest, and they park on the street, it
would likely be longer than 6 hours anyway. Remove the restriction. Thank you.
Kyle Moldenhauer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 11:39 am
4 Votes
I was not aware of the 6 hour limit but was aware of the seasonal parking restrictions.
Da x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 11:44 am
11 Votes
I did not know this, and I follow many of the city of Edina threads. I am aware of the
seasonal and no overnight parking. We live by Creek Valley/lower EHS and were recently
ticketed for parking our car in the street next to our driveway for the day (which we have
done many times) - not student day parking. I think this is not needed, and the
inconsistent enforcement of the rule is unfair.
Rick Treece · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:05 pm
4 Votes
I was not aware of the 6-hour rule. Doug Haining's approach makes the most sense to
me.
Roger Scharton · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:48 pm
2 Votes
I've been an Edina resident for 30 years and have always been aware of the parking
ordinance. Managing and restricting on street parking is a needed safety and traffic
congestion solution. Public streets should not be used for long term parking. Consider
the problems Minneapolis has with its residential street parking. Six hours is perhaps too
short a time period but an unlimited parking time limit should not be permitted.
Tom LaForce · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 12:51 pm
9 Votes
6 years on the Transportation Commission and this is the first I've heard of it. I don't see
it being necessary. Sometimes we have guests and want to leave their cars in the street
so as to not run into cars parked in what's normally an empty driveway.
2 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
Scott Busyn · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 12:53 pm
5 Votes
While I do like a law that prevents long term car parking on the streets, 6 hours seems
too short. 24 hours makes more sense to allow for visitors but prevents the streets being
uses for long term parking.
Ann Swenson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 12:55 pm
4 Votes
The six hour rule was put in years ago for several reasons.
1. So that neighborhoods near business areas did not have employees parking in front of
their houses while at work. Ie 50 and France or Grandview area
2. So that streets by a bus stop did not turn into a park and ride. Ie curently a number of
cars park on Concord and valleyview to ride the bus leaving no parking for neighbors.
Response:
Tom Koon · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 3:41 pm
The city council has failed to provide enough park and rides. We must encourage bus
ridership by allowing riders to park near a bus stop. Buses do not serve those living in
the Edina subdivisions very well. However, if one can drive to an express bus it is a
good alternative and competitive time wise with driving to and from downtown
Minneapolis during rush hour. Also the city's expensive misguided obsession with
calming traffic could be resolved cheaply with lots of cars parked on the street as
opposed to narrowing streets and other expensive solutions. We could then have wider
streets when needed. Edina is now a prosperous urban area in many parts of a
community originally designed for households that had only one car.. Therefore, there
are lots of cars owned by residents and the home service providers residents require.
The school board has consolidated its schools and located schools in neighborhoods
with little or no side walks so that students who cannot or will not ride a bus must drive
or rely on their parents to drive.
Melissa Schmidt · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:59 pm
6 Votes
I am aware of the seasonal parking restrictions but did not know about there was an
ordinance for a 6 hour limit that applies all day every day. The timing of this discussion
is relevant to our family since my high school daughter almost had her car towed for
parking on the street in front of my parents' house during the school day. My parents
live near the high school but on a street that is far enough away that there's NEVER an
issue with high school kids parking there. I agree that there should be an ordinance that
applies to neighborhoods affected by high schoolers parking their vehicles and it should
be clearly marked. What I find frustrating is that my daughter has never parked on the
street in front of my parents' house until this week and two different police officers
approached her car; one chalked the tire. This was after my dad talked with the first
officer and said it was his granddaughter's car and he would ensure she parked in their
driveway next time (he was not aware of the 6 hour rule either). My neighbors frequently
have overnight/weekend guests that park on the street. To my knowledge this has never
been an issue because it happens often - as recently as last weekend when one neighbor
had 3-4 cars on the street for much longer than 6 hours. If it's a rule that's going to be
3 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
enforced then enforce it. If certain vehicles are going to be targeted it's time to
eliminate or change the rule.
Rick Hendrickson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 2:47 pm
2 Votes
Lived in Edina since 5 years old and was never aware of a parking time restriction. I am
aware of the seasonal overnight restrictions. Why are they needed? Other cities and
municipalities have one night week restrictions for street cleaning and use 'snow
emergencies' when applicable. As for parking in residential areas there should be no on
street parking time limit as there is no purpose. I paid for the street in front of my
property!
Tom Koon · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 3:04 pm
4 Votes
I was aware of the six hour rule. I do not support it. We should allow people to park on
the street especially in areas where the city thinks we need traffic calming measures its
cheaper then narrowing the streets or other devices used.
As Edina becomes more urban we need to change the rules. Think of all the construction
and remodeling projects that are going on around the community, the lack of a park and
rides because the city has failed to develop for bus riders who wish to use mass transit
to go downtown, the lack of off street parking for employees making very little money,
households with more cars then space to park on their property in the older
neighborhoods and the inconsistent lack of enforcement that leads to disputes. I
suggest changing the limit to 72 hours.
James Peterson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 10, 2018 5:01 pm
2 Votes
comment...I was not aware of the 6-hour limit and I think it is to short for nighttime
parking. It essentially eliminates guest overnight parking. I was aware of the seasonal
restrictions
Bonnie Guari · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55123) · May 10, 2018 6:53 pm
1 Votes
I've lived in Edina since 1980 and only recently learned about the 6-hour on street
parking limit. I have never read about it nor have I ever seen the limit posted anywhere.
If you have overnight guests, a six-hour limit is too short. If the city has parking
problems in some areas, it will need to get more creative about addressing the
problems. Work with the high school on its parking issues. The seasonal parking
restrictions (Nov.1-May 1) make sense since the streets need to be clear for plowing.If
the city chooses to make the parking restrictions more complicated in some areas, it will
cost money for signs and communications. If the city chooses to use a resident parking
system, say with dashboard signs or tabs, administrative costs will increase for issuing
the permits.
4 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 8:04 pm
4 Votes
I was not aware of the 6 hour limit and think it should be eliminated.
David Frenkel · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 9:33 pm
2 Votes
It is never enforced. Bottom line if you don't enforce a law get rid of it. According to the
Edina City manager the city does 'passive enforcement' of city ordinances.
Judy Randall · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 5:55 am
2 Votes
I was not aware of the 6-hour limit and think it should be eliminated.
Gramt Johnson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 8:59 am
1 Votes
I was aware of the seasonal ban but not the 6 hour limit. It seems to be a citywide
solution to a problem only experienced by small sections of neighborhoods. I am in favor
of a longer time period and controlling parking in the problem areas with time limits
and/or permits for street parking.
Judie Erickson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 9:06 am
1 Votes
I did not know of the 6-hour limit. I was aware of the seasonal ban. I am in favor of
dropping the ban. My driveway is narrow and my guests park in the street.
Kevin Merrigan · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 11:40 am
1 Votes
I did not know of the 6-hour limit. I did find out when my high school son was recently
given a ticket parking by the school, in a spot he has parked at all year. The 6-hour limit
needs to be increased or eliminated. There are quite a few high school drivers that were
not able get a school parking permit and thus have to park around the school, who now
are forced to leave during school to move their car (or risk a ticket). 6-hours is not an
average school day. Not sure this is the best use of school time.
Marc Donnelly · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 12:18 pm
0 Votes
I'm aware of the 6 hour limit because I recently looked it up in regards to EHS students
using neighborhoods around EHS for school parking.
5 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
Trent Luger · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · May 13, 2018 8:14 pm
0 Votes
I was not aware of the 6 hour limit. It should be enforced on Morningside Road.
Janet Conn · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 13, 2018 10:28 pm
0 Votes
No, I did not know about the 6-hour limit.
Mary Palmer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 14, 2018 5:08 am
2 Votes
I was not aware of the 6 hour limit on parking. I feel this rule should be dropped. I also
feel there should be overnight parking on the street too year round if there is no snow in
the forecast.
Mark Kaiser · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 14, 2018 12:25 pm
1 Votes
It is not broken so please don't fix it! If I wanted to live in a city full of parked cars on the
street I would move to Mpls. If I lived near a school the last thing I would want is some
random kid's jalopy parked in front of my house all day every day. What's next?
Contractor trailers parked for months on end on already tight streets?
mary everett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 60487) · May 14, 2018 1:14 pm
1 Votes
I have lived here for 32 years and had no idea. I know about the seasonal night time
restrictions but never heard of the other and no one that has parked at my house outside
the seasonal restriction dates has EVER been ticketed. I think it is ridiculous because
what if you don't have driveway space and overnight family or guests???? I do however
like restrictions regarding boats, RV's etc that are not allowed to be parked in driveways
or at properties for more than the allowed period of time so that a neighbor does not
need to look at an eye soar because someone decides not to provide proper storage for
their items.
Brian Durst · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 15, 2018 6:39 pm
2 Votes
I knew about the seasonal restriction but not the 6 hour limit. I would like to see the 6
hour limit removed. Thank you.
Kevin Kajer · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 16, 2018 12:08 pm
2 Votes
A 6 hour limit is antiquated and unreasonable. It fails to recognize that most high school
kids and kids returning from college need and have a car that has to be parked
6 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
somewhere. Also, the limit does seem to be bias against the less fortunate who may not
have a three (or more) car garage.
Elizabeth Cecchi · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 16, 2018 3:59 pm
2 Votes
20th year of Edina residency, first I've heard of the six-hour on street parking limit. I live
in Morningside, an area that was developed earlier than most of the rest of Edina. Think
narrow lots, small garages, shared driveways - and we have all three. Our garage is so
small we cannot park a car inside and since we share a driveway with our neighbours
there's no way we can ever allow guests to park on it. This already causes difficulties in
the winter when we have overnight guests; we frequently have to borrow spaces in
other's driveways (luckily we have extremely nice neighbors). Each year we look forward
to April 15 with eagerness because it makes life so much easier to be able to park our
own vehicles on the street. Remove the six hour on-street parking limit.
Kris Paul · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 16, 2018 5:11 pm
1 Votes
I also have never heard of the 6 hour parking restriction, and I have lived in the
Morningside neighborhood for 16 years. I completely agree with most of the responses
that the City should do away with this restriction for the many reasons already stated.
Specifically, many people have to park one of their own cars on the street overnight,
overnight guests need a place to park, and at times like this when we have painters
taking up our driveway and access to our garage for several days, we have to keep our
cars on the street during the day so we can come and go. There is no sense to a parking
limit in front of our own homes except for the winter overnight ban so the streets can get
plowed.
Bill Johnson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 16, 2018 5:31 pm
3 Votes
I am aware of the seasonal and 6 hour parking limits and I am in favor of the restrictions.
The 6 hour limit prevents long-term parking issues, decreases congestion and improves
pedestrian and motorist safety.
Richard Bragg · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 17, 2018 12:22 pm
0 Votes
I was unaware of the 6 hour restriction and am certain that it is not enforced because I
have a number of neighbors that park in the street at all times (except during winter
restrictions). It is not ideal as it creates a narrow path for two way traffic, even worse on
trash days as people place trash containers in the street, and creates blind areas beyond
cars when children are playing nearby (cars still drive too fast in neighborhoods).
Although I prefer to have everyone park in their garage or driveway, it is not practical to
expect a six hour window for those who don't or can't. Some neighbors have healthcare
providers visiting during the day for special needs residents but only during the day. I
know that some have responded that having out of town guests makes even a 24hr
restriction not feasible and should be removed in its entirety. I do see the value in
placing some limitations for the benefits listed above and would like to see it remain, be
7 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
enforced but have rules that make it convenient for those having long term guests.
There could be an option to go on the City website and register guest cars, etc. and print
out a temporary parking pass (much like one does today to give notice of a backyard
bonfire). This pass can be printed from home and placed on the vehicles parked long
term for, say more than 48hrs. Hope this option is helpful.
Chris Hubert · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 17, 2018 3:12 pm
1 Votes
I did not know about the 6 hour restriction.
In general, I think 6 hours is unreasonably short. However, I think certain neighborhoods
may have legitimate needs to reduce parking / flow of traffic and that a one size-fits all
policy may not work for such neighborhoods. For example, it may be beneficial to have
permitted parking for residents in a given area (e.g., near schools and businesses) to
allow residents of those areas to utilize street parking.
Susan McCarthy · Citizen · (Postal Code: 53189) · May 17, 2018 5:38 pm
0 Votes
A 6 hour limit probably should be considered for specific residential zones, if necessary. I
may feel it is not necessary for my particular neck of the woods, but I understand that it
has benefits where some neighborhoods border schools, parks, commercial, etc.
Isaac Broberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 17, 2018 9:43 pm
0 Votes
Been here 10 years and never heard of it. I don't think its enforced.
Sue Gormley · Citizen · (Postal Code: 60629) · May 19, 2018 4:50 pm
0 Votes
I have lived in Edina for 50 years and am aware of the 6 hour parking limit because I
read the mailings I am sent from the city. I understand that not everyone has off street
parking and may have guests on occasion who need to park in the street for the
weekend but unlimited street parking would make Edina look just like Minneapolis, which
is a a nightmare. I agree with Richard Bragg that if you need to have long term parking
for guests that a permit could be requested from the city. Even just notifying the Police
department and neighbors could work. My biggest objection to unlimited street parking
is when the parking is in front of my home and the people are not my guests. I do not
want cars parked in the street in front of my house and I have many neighbors who
agree but have not posted on this site yet. There is a bus stop near us and the thought
of people parking on the street all day every day in front of our homes is the last thing
we want. There is no one size fits all here. For those who need to park in front of their
own homes maybe the rule can be adjusted temporarily but in general, the six hour rule
is very generous and should be left in place.
Deb Grewe · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 19, 2018 6:47 pm
0 Votes
8 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
I am in favor of retaining the 6 hour parking limit. I live near a bus route and don’t want
the front of my property to become a park and ride. With the narrowed streets, it
becomes a safety issue, especially with small children. I agree that a temporary permit
system could be put into place for those that have guests that come into town.
Sarah Franssen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 22, 2018 10:46 am
0 Votes
Yes, but just because I read the city's publications.
cecil bassett · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 30, 2018 10:52 pm
0 Votes
I have lived in two homes in Edina, since 1994, and I knew of the restrictions since
moving here. When I lived on Maple Road, I had one guest who left the car on the road
and he was ticketed. None of my neighbors left their cars on the road. We currently live
on a cul-de-sac and neighbors and guests have left cars on the road, over the 6 hours
and sometimes over 48 hours, without moving them. Some neighbors and myself, have
needed to leave the cars on the road over the time limits and with notifying the city of
the need, no tickets or fines have been levied. Granted, the 6 hour and the overnight
parking is not strictly enforced.
Residents and guests should be able to move the cars as needed. While this is an
inconvenience moving the car from the drive way to the road and back, it should likely
be a minor one. The increasing density will necesitate better parking regulations, but
this should be addressed with on-site parking.
Aesthetically, it is better to have less cars parked on the road and the aesthetics is a
reason to move to Edina. However, safety should be priority; cars left on the street allow
for children to run between cars into the street and not be seen until it might be too late.
CHANGING THE TIME LIMIT 37 Answers · 3 Replies
Should the City consider changing the six-hour time limit to a shorter limit, a
longer limit or no limit at all and why?
Kaylin Eidsness · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 07, 2018 1:48 pm
1 Votes
[Comment from Joel Stegner] If you keep the overnight restriction, here is what you
could do. For cars found parked after 10, put a warning under the wiper. Note the
location. If the warning is still there in the morning, write a ticket. If it is there, but with
no warning, then no ticket.
Expecting the car to move every day is frequent enough. If you find the car and ticket
still there the next day, write another ticket.
Ryn Melberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 11:27 am
4 Votes
No, please keep it and do more to enforce the over night parking. I live in an older part
9 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
of town with narrow streets that are reduced to one lane when someone is parked there.
These restrictions are a reasonable balance.
Can we have signs posting the restrictions in the neighborhoods?
Jean-Charles Compagnon · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 11:33 am
9 Votes
Home owners should not be restricted to park in front of their home.
Doug Haining · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 11:38 am
17 Votes
The 6 hour limit should go the way of the dinosaurs... It should be eliminated. Many
families have more cars than will fit in their driveways. They should not be penalized for
parking on the street. Many people have visiting guests who park on the street. Those
folks should not be penalized either. Remove the restriction. Thank you.
Response:
Paul Juhl · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 05, 2018 7:49 am
I agree. I live on an alley without a driveway so street parking is very important.
Kyle Moldenhauer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 11:43 am
6 Votes
While I have no issue with a parking restriction, 6 hours seems a bit short to me. An
extension to an overnight time (like 8-10 hours) seems reasonable. In particular, for
visiting overnight guests to residents for those who have short driveways.
Da x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 11:47 am
8 Votes
Home owners should not be restricted to park in front of their home, except in the
winter/snow plowing season.
Rick Treece · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:10 pm
7 Votes
A longer limit, in days rather than hours.
Dylan Noonan · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:11 pm
1 Votes
I did not know about the time limit but I am very pleased to hear there is one. I would
even vote to shorten the limit or even remove completely. We live near 50th and France
and we constantly have cars parked in the front of our house. Maybe the city can post 6
hour parking limit signs on the streets around the shops.
10 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
Steven Anderson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:14 pm
4 Votes
I completely agree that home owners should be allowed to park in front of or at least
near to their homes when plowing is not necessary. Perhaps a permit that can be placed
on the dash of the parked vehicle would be OK.
Roger Scharton · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:53 pm
3 Votes
Day parking is understandable but overnight parking should continue to be restricted.
Public streets should not be view as a long term parking solution.
Response:
Isaac Broberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 17, 2018 9:47 pm
Overnight is hardly a long term parking "solution". What exactly is a parking solution
anyways? Do you expect out of town guests to park in the closest pay lot and take a
Lyft to their friend's/family member's home?
Tom LaForce · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 12:55 pm
9 Votes
The streets are public. There shouldn't be an exemption made for the homeowner. I'm in
favor of eliminating or lengthening the time restrictions.
Don Rahe · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 2:38 pm
0 Votes
I almost got towed last summer while our house was being remodeled and the driveway
was occupied by a large dumpster. So, I parked my second car under a tree by my
neighbor's house with his permission. I moved it one day around the corner because a
new neighbor was having things delivered with a huge truck, only to see a chalked tire
and a notice on the windshield that evening that less than an hour from then it was to be
towed. Apparently the old retired attorney there knew the law and could have
successfully done this to my car. The city told me this when I inquired that these are the
current rules but that they do not enforce the time restriction or overnight rule in
summer unless somebody complains.
So I returned to parking in front of my neighbor's house without incident, except that a
week later some anonymous person mistook my nice car which I had just bought months
earlier as some other car he claimed incorrectly in an angry note of being "parked there
again like all last summer" and demanded it to be taken off the street.
So, to me the current rules are not practical in summer for a neighborhood where there
are seldom more than a couple cars ever parked on any block late at night and even in
the height of the day. I always have known and followed the winter restrictions because
they make common sense and one expects that type of rule, but neither I nor my Edina
based contractor had suspected that there was an issue of parking on the street by my
house with my neighbor's permission overnight. So, please allow that, maybe with some
permit sticker for street parking during construction when the situation easily can allow
or to park overnight or if one has house guests for a week and parking in front of one's
11 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
house would helpful.
Kaycie Bellanger · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 2:58 pm
6 Votes
I feel I should be able to park infront of my house over night. As long as it does not
conflict with the snow plows or maintaince there should be no issues
Cyd P. · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 3:11 pm
2 Votes
I've seen policies elsewhere that give only the homeowners the right to park their cars
in front of their homes... it's essentially "permit" parking for the homeowner.... during
specific hours (like 4 pm - 9 am) This prevents employees or others in busy areas from
long term parking their cars in front of someones home. But it does allow shoppers or
park visitors some parking hours in the busy areas of town. It also allows homeowners
the right to keep their vehicle parked on the street overnight or during the day.
Exceptions could be made in edina for snow emergencies. Not saying this approach is
needed on every street... but perhaps in the busy areas where residents are being left
without parking or have concerns about park and ride issues.
Tom Koon · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 3:17 pm
3 Votes
Besides parking in front or near my home, I should be able to park near a bus stop
especially stops for express buses as the city has failed to develop an adequate supply
of park and rides. We are not the Edina of the 1940's with one car in a household and
everyone else rode the street car or a bus, walked to school and shopped near their
home. There is a constant need for construction workers to park all day and various
services coming to a home owner. Further most families have a car for everyone over
the age of 16 and in neighborhoods that were designed for families with one car in the
1910s and 1920s.
James Peterson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 10, 2018 5:15 pm
1 Votes
comment...I think we need a two-tiered ordnance that allows overnight parking in the
residential areas and perhaps shorter than 6-hours daytime parking in the business
district and around the schools. I feel for people who live around the soccer/baseball
fields but I don't think there should be any restrictions that limits access to the kid's
sports programs.
I do think there should be signs posted where necessary, whatever the limits are.
Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 8:12 pm
7 Votes
I think the parking restriction should be eliminated. Residents and their guests should be
able to park in front of their house whenever they want. A 6 hour time limit is
12 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
ridiculously too short and there should not be such restrictions on residential streets.
Judy Randall · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 6:01 am
4 Votes
Please remove the 6-hour parking restriction, it does not serve residents' needs. From
my observations walking around our neighborhood, most residents are not aware of the
restriction and appreciate the ability to park in the street. Additionally, a 6-hour parking
restriction does not allow for overnight or out-of-town guests.
Judie Erickson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 9:08 am
2 Votes
Drop the limit. If there are areas where street parking is an issue, these should be
addressed on an individual basis, not a blanket restriction throughout the whole city.
Marc Donnelly · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 12:21 pm
0 Votes
I'd decrease the limit to less then 6 hours, but allow homeowners (or homeowner
guest/contractors) to park longer in front of their house.
Eric Schuler · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 12:57 pm
0 Votes
I was aware of the 6 hour parking restriction, but assumed it was never really enforced. 6
hours seems far too short. There is a long list of legitimate reasons why someone may
need to leave their car parked on the street for more than 6 hours. If the goal is to avoid
cars staying in one spot for days or weeks at a time why not make the limit 24 hours?
Marie Thorpe · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 13, 2018 1:12 am
2 Votes
People should be able to park in front of their homes. The limit should be extended.
When did the 6-hr limit originate? Seems archaic.
Trent Luger · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · May 13, 2018 8:16 pm
0 Votes
I would not support increasing or removing the 6 hr limit. Reducing to 4 hr would be okay
if it makes enforcement easier.
Janet Conn · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 13, 2018 10:30 pm
0 Votes
I think the 6-hour limit should be extended to 48 hours, if not dropped altogether.
13 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
Mary Palmer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 14, 2018 5:15 am
0 Votes
I feel the 6 hour limit is too short. People should be able to park in front of their house
overnight and guests should be able to park there too.
mary everett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 60487) · May 14, 2018 1:14 pm
0 Votes
No limit except in winter, at night, so streets can be cleaned.
Brian Durst · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 15, 2018 6:42 pm
1 Votes
I think the 6 hour limit should be removed.
Joyce Mellom · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 16, 2018 4:29 pm
0 Votes
I am in favor of time limits on parking cars on residential streets. Cars parked for long
hours or overnight on the street are a nuisance and an eyesore. School buses, garbage
trucks, etc cannot pass through and the streets cannot be swept or plowed.
Susan McCarthy · Citizen · (Postal Code: 53189) · May 17, 2018 5:40 pm
0 Votes
No comment on time limits, as it would not impact where I live in the Cornelia Lake area.
Isaac Broberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 17, 2018 9:53 pm
0 Votes
I would support a limit in the business districts if there are residences nearby. Otherwise
there shouldn't be any restrictions to parking on public roads. There are other ways to
address any nuisance cars, most often just being a friendly neighbor solves an issue.
Anne Kaminsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55343) · May 19, 2018 2:01 pm
0 Votes
I think 6 hours is definitely too short. It makes Edina seem exceedingly unfriendly to
visitors. I think it would be reasonable for cars to be moved say every three days.
Sarah Franssen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 22, 2018 10:47 am
0 Votes
Six hours seems pretty reasonable to me, but I could understand eight hours for
14 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
overnight guests.
Annie O'Neill · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 29, 2018 8:23 pm
0 Votes
The 6 hour limit should be removed. It serves no useful purpose and seems archaic. As
many have noted, homeowners and their guests should be allowed to park in front of
their homes overnight. Think of the implication for people who attend gatherings at
friends' homes and decide to uber/lyft home or catch a ride with a sober friend if they
have been drinking --- only to return the following day to see that their car has been
ticketed or towed after making the responsible decision to get home safely! Think of
similar implications for young people attending overnight gatherings at friends' houses
and deciding to spend the night. The restriction only makes sense in the winter months
for street cleaning purposes; the remaining restrictions should be eliminated.
richard young · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 30, 2018 8:54 am
0 Votes
The present ordinance is fine. It just needs to be enforced. The issue I have is with
student parking on residential streets from 8 am until 3:30. The police department has
not been enforcing the ordinance . The parking creates a safety problem (narrow
streets) and is not the intended use for residential streets. The ordinance needs to on
the books otherwise the police cannot enforce the proper use of residential streets. The
ordinance could be modified to only deal with student parking, but that might be difficult
to enforce. I am not in favor of more street signs they just move the problem. For first
time offenders a warning can be issued (solving the problem of evening parties parking),
Warnings have been used to limited effect regarding the student parking.
NO PARKING SIGNS 19 Answers · 1 Replies
Students and participants in Parks & Recreation events sometimes use
all the available parking spots in an area, so residents are unable to use
them. Should there be specific parking restrictions around schools and
parks? (i.e., No Parking 8 a.m. – 4 p.m. Monday – Friday.) Keep
in mind, residents would also not be able to park on the streets in the
specified areas during those dates and times either.
Paul Juhl · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 05, 2018 8:33 am
1 Votes
I feel there ought to be few restrictions for parking but if there are certain areas where
it's a consistent problem, there should be a mechanism for residents to be able to park
in front of their homes. Perhaps a limit on the # of hours parked during certain time
periods or being able to get a permit. Regarding the high school, I have no idea of the
school's policy on student parking or the capacity in the lot. When I went to high school
decades ago, at old Edina in fact, some kids needed a car to get to an after school job
but many just didn't want to ride the bus. If there is a consistent overflow of student
parking onto streets these days I can understand residents and their guests being
15 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
frustrated.
Kaylin Eidsness · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 07, 2018 1:49 pm
1 Votes
[Comment from Joel Stegner] I was involved at starting the Yorktown Community Garden.
There was literally no city parking for that park - none on York and no on the adjacent
street in Richfield. The limited parking at the Southdale Y was being used.
The Y was a good neighbor and didn’t challenge this, but when I suggested the city
provide parking, Y helped with $50,000 and 30+ spots were added to be used jointly, a
win-win solution.
Parks need city parking. People object to paving green space, but since the lot was built
park and Y use has increased. Some street parking should always be available for park
use. Residents can use their garages and driveways, but their visitors also need places.
As Edina has way too many busy streets with no sideways, you need solutions so young
children and older adults with walkers aren’t In the street, forced to walk rather than
more safely drive.
Ryn Melberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 11:29 am
1 Votes
I'm on Pamela Park and appreciate the cooperation from the police when there are all-
day events; they allow extended parking on the street since there is not enough parking
for these events in the lots.
Beth Psihos · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 11:30 am
5 Votes
If you buy a house by a park or a school, you should expect that people who use the
park or the school will park there. To restrict or eliminate parking around these areas
because someone might have a visitor at some point is crazy.
Da x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 11:50 am
2 Votes
No, there should not be restrictions unless parking on both sides of the street causes
traffic flow issues. In that case, restrictions on certain sides should be allowed
Rick Treece · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:17 pm
4 Votes
To me parks and schools are not equivalent re: parking. Schools have all-day, regular
users and should provide adequate parking for them. Parks have sporadic short-term
users. But the same solution can work in both cases. Put up signs that limit street
parking to 3 hours in those areas 8 a.m. - 8 p.m., say. Maybe 4 hours around parks – do
16 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
baseball games last over 3 hours or does it just feel that way?
Roger Scharton · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 12:59 pm
5 Votes
Students should not use city streets for parking in lieu of on campus parking. Way to
many potential problems. Residents should have the right to post parking restrictions
adjacent to their as needed.
Melissa Schmidt · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 1:04 pm
4 Votes
Public streets are public. Residents should not be given priority use of street parking
over someone there to attend an event at a nearby park. Traffic flow is a different issue.
If a street is too narrow for a parked car on either side and a moving vehicle can't get
through then there shouldn't be parking on one side of the street.
Michelle Collette · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 10, 2018 2:21 pm
3 Votes
I live on a cul de sac street next to the high school. Despite no parking signs, thus block
is still an active drop off/pick up spot. I understand why the signs were put up before we
lived here as the circle can become a parking lot. That said, it would be helpful to have
a mechanism for residents to have house maintenance work done without either vendor
or resident being ticketed when both the driveway and one street spot are needed. I
moved here from a NYC suburb where street parking was also restricted. The town
issued "Resident" passes where during the specified hours, one car registered associated
with that address could park directly in front.
Rick Hendrickson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 3:09 pm
1 Votes
As for scheduled sporting activities in Parks; what ever happened to team members
carpooling or cycling to their games? As for school parking; the only students of age
would be in high-school. As there is only one and the existing on premise parking egress
is congested at best given staff for both Valley View and the High School the solution
might be to charge even more for permits. If the residents surrounding the school
believe parking and increased traffic is a menace they should request permit only
parking restictions such as those surround the private colleges in Mpls and St. Paul. At
least in the past St. Patricks either opened their lot for free or permits. Do they still do
this and is the church on Antrum open to the possibility. In the past they have posted No
Parking signs with the threat of towing. Perhaps a teachable moment for students to
grow beyond the feeling of entitlement to understanding and feeling the positive
emotions of empathy can bring.
Tom Koon · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 3:21 pm
0 Votes
17 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
How about finding alternatives that encourage students to walk to school or take a bus?
Beyond that, no restrictions regarding parking on the street. .
Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 8:15 pm
3 Votes
Residents should never be restricted from parking in front of their own homes. And
streets need to be wide enough to allow street parking and adequate passing traffic
lanes. The policy of narrowing streets just creates more conflict, congestion and safety
concerns when there is not adequate street space to accommodate the traffic, parking,
pedestrians and bicyclists.
Trent Luger · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · May 13, 2018 8:20 pm
1 Votes
Schools and Parks aren't the only areas that need to be addressed. Neighborhood streets
adjacent to business districts with insufficient employee parking should be included in
the discussion.
Janet Conn · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 13, 2018 10:36 pm
1 Votes
If there are areas where the intention is to prevent all-day parking by students,
employees, etc., I suggest that residents be given two or three tags they could use for
guests, repairmen, etc. that exempt them from the parking prohibition. I. e., let residents
and their visitors park on the street during the otherwise 'no parking' hours.
Chris Hubert · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 17, 2018 3:27 pm
1 Votes
Neighborhoods around schools and businesses should have the option to restrict parking
if parking and the associated traffic causes problems (e.g., safety concerns). I suggest
permitted parking to allow those residents to still utilize street parking.
Isaac Broberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 17, 2018 9:54 pm
0 Votes
Its ridiculous that Edina is being passive aggressive to avoid the concept of resident only
parking signs.
Response:
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2018 10:49 pm
Isaac, I know I'm a little slow, but I don't understand the meaning of your sentence.
It would help if you could explain its intent more clearly. Thank you
Sarah Franssen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 22, 2018 10:50 am
1 Votes
18 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
With all of the changes to Pamela Park combined with the ridiculous number of
construction vehicles, it is *really* hard for residents to get around, much less park their
cars. I've been literally blocked into my driveway at times when I need to get to work.
I've seen buses have to reroute on the fly because they can't make it down the streets.
This is my kids' reality. I can't let them ride their bikes much of the time because it is a
safety hazard. Does anyone care about the people who live here?
Judith Felker · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 26, 2018 10:45 pm
0 Votes
1. I agree with the majority of posts here, that the six hour parking rule should be
eliminated.
2. School personnel should poll students who drive about their reasons for driving, and
create a remedy. If, for example, kids remain on school grounds for after-school
activities, there should be a (certain time) bus when it's needed, and (another certain
time) for "last bus leaving".
Students should be well informed that taking the bus is better for the environment, more
respectful of residents living near the schools, and safer because of congestion on
streets during school starting hours. LISTEN to the H.S. drivers to ascertain their NEED
to drive, and then meet their needs by changing the bus service system.
3. The city should immediately create more "park and ride" lots to encourage commuting
by bus,
This may require builders to provide space for these lots in their building plans.
No one enjoys sitting in traffic, concerned about getting to work on time. MEET THE
NEED!
4. The city should create more bus routes to and from main business areas to reduce the
need for parking on residential streets.
PARKING COMMENTS 29 Answers · 4 Replies
What are your biggest concerns with parking on City streets? Any
suggestions to improve them?
Kaylin Eidsness · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 07, 2018 1:50 pm
3 Votes
[Comment by Joel Stegner] I have called communicated this concern many times,
Pedestrian safety. I live on Barrie Road, a busy, curving street with only one outlet on
the north. There are no sidewalks, so all pedestrians up in the street.
On the part in front of my condo, parking is allowed on both sides of the street. When
people park across from each other, there is only space for one car to pass through, and
if car doors are open, it is tight for one. The same things happen when pedestrians or
bicyclists pass. Cars come from the north around a blind curve with some speed and
one has to take extreme care leaving our parking garage.
Banning parking on one side would lessen the problem as would painting a center line or
building sidewalks. The whole street is like that. Even where parking is banned, walking
in the street very dangerous, especially at night because street lighting is poor. Turning
onto a dark street and immediately encounter a senior with a walker or a mother with a
stroller and one or more young children is stressful. Parked cars is only a part of the
problem.
19 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
It seems as if highend neighborhoods get these things fixed, but nothing has happened
since I arrived in 2011 and I am not aware of anything on the books.
Beth Psihos · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 11:34 am
9 Votes
My biggest issue is the new streets that Edina is creating when they "redo" streets. They
have made them so narrow that you can hardly get by if one person is parked, much less
cars on both sides. Valley view east of Tracy is especially treacherous, and parking is
only allowed on one side. I think for the narrow streets they are now creating, parking
should only be allowed on one side.
Ryn Melberg · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 11:36 am
1 Votes
Parking in bike lanes! The new bike lane configuration is helping but this is still a
problem in some areas.
Neighbors parking their commercial vehicles on the street over night. The police seem to
give all commercial vehicles a free-pass when violating the parking rules. A maintenance
van is not parked at 2 am in front of a house with all the lights off if they are there on
business!
The police routinely violating the parking rules, including state laws. The police should
be modeling the behavior we all want from our fellow citizens. So please stop parking in
bike lanes, fire lanes, blocking hydrants, too close to the corner, etc. Sure, the police
want to "quick" run in and do something. So do we. Park legally like the rest of us,
please.
Da x · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 10, 2018 11:53 am
5 Votes
Increased density will lead to increased need for street parking. Increasing restrictions is
counter-intuitive.
Steve Young · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 10, 2018 12:10 pm
0 Votes
The 44th & France commercial node is always parking challenged and needs more
parking for its surrounding businesses and residents. Street parking exists on France
Ave between 44th St & Sunnyside. Please extend street parking on France Ave south of
44th Street.
Scott Busyn · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 12:55 pm
5 Votes
Keep the no parking rule overnight during the winter. This allows the streets to be
plowed curb to curb. Minneapolis is a disaster during the winter and one of the big
20 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
reasons is they allow overnight parking in the winter.
Response:
Don Rahe · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 05, 2018 4:32 am
I agree in general with the winter overnight restriction. I find it is safer driving at night
on my local not busy street in the winter darkness when there are very few cars parked
on the street. Others, however, have mentioned parking permits one could purchase
for temporary use, and I never knew about those, but it would have helped me last
summer during remodeling when our driveway was closed for three months and I
parked on the street but almost got towed due to an anonymous neighbor who called
the cops. I had been unaware of the six hour rule that applies both winter and summer
and enables somebody do that to another person, and the city staffer said the rule is
not generally enforced unless someone calls in with a complaint. I think that
temporary permits that were public knowledge could solve some of these issues and
yet keep the streets from becoming a crowded unpleasant sight full of cars day and
night.
Sean Hayford Oleary · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55423) · May 10, 2018 1:34 pm
0 Votes
I'd like to see more on-street parking in commercial areas. When a private parking lot
reaches capacity, the only option is to illegally park in a neighboring private lot. Plus, on-
street parking would allow you to park once and walk to multiple businesses without
moving your car each time. I'd especially like to see this in the Southdale area. (50th &
France already has ample public parking options)
Barb Fraley · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 2:25 pm
11 Votes
I agree with Beth P. The new narrower streets are causing drivers to cross into the other
lane. Valley View by Tracy is a good example. So is Hansen Road between the pond and
the park., near Forslin Drive. If the rationale for narrowing the streets was to get people
to slow down, it is not working. The other issue I have is when people park directly
across from the entrance to my driveway. Now that the streets are even narrower,
getting safely out of the driveway without hitting someone is a challenge.
Response:
Linda Damman · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 10, 2018 4:04 pm
Completely agree. Within the first year of our new and “improved” streets one of our
guests had his car backed into by a neighbor trying to get out of his driveway. A huge
inconvenience for our guest and an embarrassment to both our neighbor and us.
Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 8:26 pm
7 Votes
I agree with the comments that the streets are too narrow. I brought this up long before
this was even implemented. There is not enough space and it is a safety hazard. No
further streets should be narrowed. Density needs to be controlled to avoid congestion
and lack of parking. Lack of parking and ramp parking is not convenient.
21 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
David Frenkel · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 10, 2018 9:39 pm
2 Votes
The south side of Golf Terrace along Lake Harvey should be marked no parking since it is
a tight corner on a narrow street. Not sure why Edina narrows its streets and Minneapolis
has been keeping its sometimes very wide streets in SW Minneapolis. I know the
reason....$$$
Jim Platt · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · May 11, 2018 8:54 am
0 Votes
We live on a cul-de-sac and parking is problematic .. as the cul-de-sac turns to the right
on entering .. it is problematic when someone parks on the corner .. and does this over
night .. also when neighbors run a business out of their home and have employees park
for extended times in front of driveways or houses .. this creates an issue .. personally in
residential areas I feel their should not be overnight parking and or long term day-time
parking .. if something is needed to address a long term guest for whatever reason .. it
would be more considerate of the neighbors if they purchased a parking permit from the
city.
Rhoda Bernstein · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 10:51 am
2 Votes
I became aware of the 6 hour rule as we are “ground zero” with high school students
parking in front of our home. We have lived here for almost a decade and our next door
neighbor for over 30 years. When the high school construction project began 2 years ago
we were told that it would be a necessary and TEMPORARY situation to allow high school
students to park on our street. It turned out NOT to be temporary at all. Students
continue to park here.
Here are some issues we’ve encountered during the past 24 months:
- Driveway partially blocked
- Snow removal hindered
- Street sweeping ineffective due to the curbs being blocked by student cars
- Trash left in the street
- A student driving across the church property adjacent to our home to clear a walking
path. They drove over the corner of our property ruining a bricked garden bed. A police
report was filed.
We do have a student who was unable to get a high school permit parking in our
driveway so we are trying to be part of a solution.
Everyone should also realize that about 2800 high school students qualify to ride the
bus. Only about 800 are doing so.
We also live across from Maguire Park. We have folks come and park all the time, but
they are usually only there for 1-2 hours. This has always been the parking pattern since
we moved here. To be clear, the opposite is true of student parking.
We are open to change, but over the past two years we have been disproportionately
impacted and so we ask that our fellow Edina residents consider our experience.
22 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
Marty Miller · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 12:29 pm
4 Votes
A Winter Parking Restriction is needed but our current one makes no sense unless the
purpose of it is to generate revenue for the city with parking tickets.
I have lived in Edina for 20 years and there are many years when there is no measurable
snow until the middle of December. When there is a measurable snow, the plows come
through overnight and the streets are completely open until the next snow sometimes
weeks later. What we have now are streets empty for 5 months or about 150 nights for
plowing when the plows are only out maybe 15 or 20 nights. Even in a high snowfall
winter, maybe 30 nights they need to be empty for plowing, 150 makes no sense at all.
What this does for a decent number of Edina residents with single car garages or small
driveways is a constant shuffling of cars. When weekend guests are in town or over the
holidays with family visiting, I have to call neighbors and ask to use their driveways so
we don't get ticketed.
Make some simple rule like "No parking on Edina streets for 24 hours after a snowfall
greater than 1 inch." Easy to follow and if we need to generate some parking ticket
revenue because of this policy change, dispatch every squad we have out to the streets
on those nights and we should be flush with cash and enjoy clean plowed streets.
Response:
Paul Juhl · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · May 05, 2018 8:45 am
I could've written this exact comment. I live on an alley with no driveway and parking
for overnight guests in the winter is challenging. Have to find a neighbor with a wide
driveway who might let us park. No reason to have the overnight restriction if there is
no snowfall.
Eric Schuler · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 11, 2018 1:10 pm
1 Votes
I am against the overnight/6 hour parking restrictions. As many have pointed out this
can cause issues when having house guests, even for just a night. Many of the lots
around me are small and do not have room for driveways where guests can get their
cars off the streets. Also in regards to the seasonal restrictions I do not understand why
the fall and winter months should be handled differently (with the exception of plowing
after snow fall of course).
Different parts of the city have different parking needs and I don't think one blanket
policy is the solution. A 6 hour limit might make sense around businesses, but doesn't fit
for more residential areas.
As someone who is impacted by these restrictions I am encouraged the city has decided
to look at these parking issues and hope they implement some more common sense
changes to laws that appear out of date to me.
Rich Haddad · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 13, 2018 6:39 pm
0 Votes
Parked cars on streets perpendicular to 50th that are too close to the intersection create
23 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
accident potential whenever two cars are trying to get on 50th and off 50th at the same
time. The parked car takes up half the street leaving a single "lane" when two are
needed,
Rob Webb · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 13, 2018 6:55 pm
1 Votes
The overnight parking restriction during winter is a significant inconvenience in the parts
of the city with limited garage and driveway capacity. If the city utilized the restriction to
actually plow (other than active storms, when parking is restricted anyway), it might
make some sense, but the restriction is rarely used for plowing. Even if they do, it is so
rare, that I'd prefer they do a temporary restriction.
Trent Luger · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55416) · May 13, 2018 8:33 pm
0 Votes
The City must start enforcing the no parking when 1.5" of snow have fallen until the
street has been plowed to curbline. Cars are routinely parked after 1.5" of snow have
fallen and plows can't effectively remove snow. The next the day the parked cars park
further away from the curb, narrowing the traveling lanes and making it very difficult to
back out of a driveway. As the winter progresses the situation gets worse and safety is
compromised. At an absolute minimum the City should be notifying area businesses and
placing signage calling attention to the law on affected streets. Enforcing the law during
the first couple of snowfalls would also go a long ways. Enforcing 6hr limit would also
help.
Janet Conn · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 13, 2018 10:42 pm
0 Votes
I did not no the prohibition on overnight parking was seasonal. It makes sense that it
applies only in the winter. Of course, if we maintain the 6-hour limit, that precludes
overnight parking any time of the year. Get rid of the 6-hour limit.
Mary Palmer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 14, 2018 5:30 am
0 Votes
There should be a new rule for overnight parking in the winter. For example if it snows
more than two inches, no parking until streets are plowed curb to curb. Like in previous
posts, there are many many nights when there is no snow in the forecast. I also agree
with other residents that the narrower streets are not safe and make it more dangerous
for pedestrians and just people getting out of their driveways. We pay a lot of money to
get our streets repaired and it is unfair to make them narrower!!
mary everett · Citizen · (Postal Code: 60487) · May 14, 2018 1:17 pm
0 Votes
My only comment is that parking in front of someones sidewalk that leads directly to the
front door should not be allowed and it is rude besides. I have no problem with people
parking on my street but when guests cannot access the sidewalk that is directly in front
24 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
of our house and goes out to the street that is upsetting.
Brian Durst · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 15, 2018 6:45 pm
0 Votes
One of my biggest concerns has been safety when my kids are playing. I think generally
cars parked on the street have been a positive, forcing drivers driving too fast down the
street to slow down to go around the cars. On the other hand, it does impact the
visibility those drivers have with kids around. Overall, I think it slows other drivers down
(a good thing) and street parking also provides flexibility for the residents and their
guests.
Andrea Bender · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · May 19, 2018 7:24 pm
1 Votes
Can something be done about the parking on Acadia near Starbucks and The Hilltop?
Heading south, I often have to drive in the northbound lane because of cars parked
along the roadside. It seems that if cars have to drive in the opposite lane then parking
should not be allowed along that stretch of road.
Sarah Franssen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · May 22, 2018 10:56 am
0 Votes
*I beg of you*, if you are going to have a parking restriction, please enforce it. If you
require the residents to call in to complain, you put us in a position of angering our
neighbors and creating a really uncomfortable/impossible relationship with them. My
neighbors and I spend all summer looking out our front windows at our neighbors' large
vehicles parked in front of our houses on Wooddale because they don't want to use their
driveways. They sometimes get left literally all weekend. My friends and elderly relatives
end up parking around the corner because they are never able to park in front of our
house. This is ridiculous. Don't create a policy you are unwilling to enforce regularly.
Lynn Burke · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 29, 2018 3:25 pm
0 Votes
Do not change the 6 hour limit please! Our streets were redone 2 years ago. They were
made more narrow at that time. I have noticed a huge difference in driving down
Chowen now. People there tend to leave their cars on that street more than some other
streets for some reason. I frequently have to stop and take turns going around cars with
other vehicles coming from the other direction as well as neighbors walking their dogs. I
also think it is dangerous because little children are less visible when there are more cars
on the street. It is also dangerous for people backing out of their driveways. it takes a
few minutes to juggle cars in the driveway but it is worth the effort. Also the
neighborhood looks crowded with all the vehicles in the street.
alice taylor · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · May 30, 2018 9:40 pm
0 Votes
25 of 26 Full Report
Street Parking
Closed May 31, 2018 · Discussion · 68 Participants · 4 Topics · 127 Answers · 9 Replies · 85 Votes
This is also a very good post which I really enjoyed reading. It is not everyday that I have
the possibility to see something
Run 3
26 of 26 Full Report
The CITY of
EDINA
Speak Up, Edina!
May Discussion: On-Street Parking
The CITY of
EDINASpeakUpEdina.org
EdinaMN.gov 2
The CITY of
EDINAOn-Street Parking
In this discussion, the City posed the following questions:
•Other than the seasonal parking restrictions, did you know there was a six -hour parking limit
on City streets?
•Should the City consider changing the six-hour time limit to a shorter limit, a longer limit or
no limit at all. Why do you feel that way?
•Students and participants in Parks & Recreation events sometimes use all the available parking
spots in an area, so residents are unable to use them. Should there be specific parking
restrictions around schools and parks? (i.e., No Parking 8 a.m.-4 p.m. Monday through Friday.)
Keep in mind, residents would also not be able to park on the streets in the specified areas
during those dates and times either.
•What are your biggest concerns with parking on City streets? Any suggestions to improve
them?
EdinaMN.gov 3
The CITY of
EDINAMay Discussion
•Open April 30-May 31
•127 comments, by 68 participants
•5,403 page views
EdinaMN.gov 4
The CITY of
EDINAIn Summary
EdinaMN.gov 5
•More people were not aware of the six-hour parking limit than were aware
•Many people said six hours is too short of a time; more suggested eliminating
the ordinance as they feel it’s rarely enforced
•Suggestions to enforce more strongly, not only on a complaint basis
•Homeowners should be able to park in front of their home with no restrictions
•Some people appreciated the ordinance to prevent the streets in the front of
their home from becoming employee parking spots and park n’ ride lots
•Suggestions to increase time limit during the overnight hours to 8 to 10 hours
•City should provide more park n’ rides
•Limit the on-street parking times around business districts and schools only
•With narrower streets, hard to back out of driveway with cars parked in street
The CITY of
EDINASpeak Up, Edina!
Questions?
SpeakUpEdina.org
EdinaMN.gov 6
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk
Item Activity:
Subject:P UBLI C HEAR I NG : Moderna Kouzina, LLC ,
DBA Moderna Kouzina New O n-S ale Intoxicating
Liquor and S unday S ale Liquor Lic enses
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
M otion approving new O n-S ale I ntoxicating and S unday S ale Liquor Licenses to Moderna Kouzina, L L C, dba
M oderna K ouzina, 3910 France Avenue, E dina for the period beginning June 19, 2018, ending March 31, 2019.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
S ee attached staff reports.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Moderna Kouzina Staff Report
Lt. Conboy's Report
June 19, 2018
Mayor and City Council
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
PUBLIC HEARING: Moderna Kouzina, LLC, DBA Moderna Kouzina New On-Sale Intoxicating
Liquor and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses
Information / Background:
Moderna Kouzina, LLC applied for new On-Sale Intoxicating and Sunday Sale Liquor Licenses. Moderna
Kouzina will be located at 3910 France Avenue South. As required by Edina City Code the necessary public
hearing notice has been published for this requested liquor license. The City Council must conduct a public
hearing for this license request.
The Administration Department has reviewed the submittals and finds that they comply with code
requirements.
The Health Department is satisfied with the applicant’s plan for storage and service.
The Planning Department has reviewed the application and finds that it complies with code requirements.
The Police Department has completed their investigation. I have attached Lt. Conboy’s memo stating the
findings of the Police Department’s background investigation.
Staff recommends the Council grant the requested licenses.
The licenses are placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council.
BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION SUMMARY
ON-SALE WINE AND ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE
Establishment: Moderna Kouzina, LLC, DBA: Moderna Kouzina
License: Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sale
In April of 2018, the Edina Police Department began a background investigation relating to a City
of Edina application for an Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sale License. The application was
submitted by Moderna Kouzina, LLC, DBA: Moderna Kouzina. Moderna Kouzina will operate
from 3910 W. 50th Street, Edina.
Moderna Kouzina is authorized to do business in Minnesota and is registered with the State of
Minnesota. Moderna Kouzina is currently active and in good standing with the Minnesota Secretary
of State.
Moderna Kouzina and/or its representatives are aware of the City of Edina's requirement relating to
employee alcohol awareness training. The training date is not currently scheduled.
Owners/Partners/Members: Moderna Kouzina:
Ashii Vrohidis Minneapolis, MN
The owners/partners/members have been investigated. No criminal records which would negatively
affect their license application were found. Checks were made with the following agencies:
NCIC
MINCIS
Hennepin County
Minnesota Secretary of State
Minnesota Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division
Personal, business and bank references were contacted and responded positively.
From the information gathered during the course of the investigation, I found nothing to prevent,
Moderna Kouzina from obtaining an Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sale license.
I would support a positive recommendation from the Police Department in regard to the issuance of
this license.
Lt. Dan Conboy #1.4:3/
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director
Item Activity:
Subject:P UBLI C HEAR I NG : R es olution Nos . 2018-54 &
2018-55, and O rdinanc e No 2018-9; C omprehensive
P lan Amendment, P reliminary P lat, P reliminary
R ezoning and P reliminary Development P lan for
P entagon P ark North for P entagon R evival LLC .
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
S taff and the P lanning Commission R ecommended approval of the C omprehensive P lan Amendment at the M ay
9, 2019 P lanning C ommission meeting. P lanning Commission Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay.
S taff and the P lanning Commission R ecommended denial of the P reliminary Rezoning & P reliminary
Development P lan at the May 9, 2019 P lanning C ommission meeting. P lanning Commission Vote: 5 Ayes and 3
Nays.
S taff has outlined three alternatives for City Council C onsideration:
1. D enial of the C omprehensive P lan Amendment, P reliminary Rezoning & P reliminary Development P lan.
2. Approval of the Comprehensive P lan Amendment & D enial of the P reliminary Rezoning & P reliminary
Development P lan as recommended by staff and the P lanning Commission.
3. Approval of the C omprehensive P lan Amendment & Approval of the P reliminary Rezoning and P reliminary
Development P lan.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
P entagon Revival L L C and C hase R eal Estate are requesting an all housing redevelopment of the P entagon P ark
parcels located north of 77th Street. All parcels combined the site is 28.91 acres in size. A P reliminary Rezoning
to P U D with a draft Overall Development P lan was approved for these parcels for an office development in
2014, however, no F inal Rezoning was sought and no Final Development P lan was approved. (S ee attached 2014
draft O verall D evelopment P lan.)
T he use and overall development plan proposed for the north parcel (residential) is very different than the uses
and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). At that time, however, the P lanning C ommission and C ity
C ouncil both expressed a desire to develop this site with some residential uses to create a mixed use development.
R esidential uses are permitted under the current M D D-6 zoning designation. T he approved preliminary plan
contemplated four stories adjacent to Fred R ichards P ark, and five stories on 77th S treet. T he C omprehensive
P lan allows up to 12 stories; while the current Z oning O rdinance maximum is four stories.
At full development build out, the project would include 1,500 new housing units. T he overall density would be
52 units per acre.
T he first phase of the project is proposed by C hase R eal Estate Group to develop a 10.86 acre portion of the site
(4600-4660 77th S treet west), with a 360-unit market rate apartment and a 225-unit senior apartment (585 total
units). As proposed the development would require the following:
A Comprehensive P lan Amendment to increase the density from 30 to 55 units per acre; and
R ezoning from M D D-6 to P U D -15, P lanned U nit Development.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Planning Commission Staff Report
Planning Commission Minutes - May 9, 2018
Site Location and Previous Development Proposals
Engineering s taff and AFO (Mic Johns on) Review memos
Sketch Plan
Applicant Narrative
Proposed Plans
WSB Traffic Study
Southdale Area Traffic Study
AUAR
Resolution No. 2018-54 (Denial of the Comp. Plan & Rezoning)
Resolution No. 2018-55 (Approval of the Prelim. Rezoning & Prelim Dev. Plan and Overall Dev. Plan)
Resolution No. 2018-54 (Approval of the Comp. Plan jus t for the Pentagon Park Site)
Ordinance No. 2018-09
Revised Res 2018-54
Revised Res. 2018-55
Pentagon Park North Staff Pres entation
Pentagon Park North Developer Pres entation
May 9, 2018
Planning Commission
Cary Teague, Community Development Director
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, & Preliminary Development Plan for
Pentagon Park North. (4820, 4510-4660 77th Street West, and 7600 Parklawn Avenue.)
Information / Background:
Pentagon Revival LLC and Chase Real Estate are requesting an all housing redevelopment of the
Pentagon Park parcels located north of 77th Street. All parcels combined the site is 28.91 acres in
size. A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for
these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and no
Final Development Plan was approved. (See attached 2014 draft Overall Development Plan.)
The use and overall development plan proposed for the north parcel (residential) is very different
than the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). At that time, however, the Planning
Commission and City Council both expressed a desire to develop this site with some residential
uses to create a mixed use development. Residential uses are permitted under the current MDD-6
zoning designation. The approved preliminary plan contemplated four stories adjacent to Fred
Richards Park, and five stories on 77th Street. The Comprehensive Plan allows up to 12 stories;
while the current Zoning Ordinance maximum is four stories.
At full development build out, the project would include 1,500 new housing units. The overall
density would be 52 units per acre.
The first phase of the project is proposed by Chase Real Estate Group to develop a 10.86 acre
portion of the site (4600-4660 77th Street west), with a 365-unit market rate apartment and a 225-
unit senior apartment (590 total units). There would be 135 independent units, 46 assisted units, 32
memory care units, 12 care suites. As proposed the development would require the following:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density from 30 to 80 units per acre.
(This amendment was denied by the City Council as part of the 7250 France Avenue
project); and
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development.
The applicant for the first phase does not intend to provide any affordable housing within the
project. Pentagon Revival is proposing to dedicate the 4820 site for a 100-unit affordable housing
project. However, there is not a development proposal to construct that housing at this time.
The Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The applicant
has responded. (See attached.) The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan,
Mic Johnson has also reviewed the plans and provided feedback. (See attached).
The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City
Council. (See attached sketch plans and minutes.) Based on feedback from the Planning
Commission, the City Council, the applicant has:
Removed two surface lots, including one on 77th Street;
Decreased private parking from 310 to 207 surface stalls;
Increased the shared Park Parking from 40 to 93 stalls;
Increased the underground parking from 442 to 558 stalls;
Increase courtyard size, opened up more landscape view, broke up the mass of the
buildings;
Market-rate plaza entry and corner off West 77th and lobby + common spaces to spill out
on for more glass store-front architecture and active corner;
Increased green space along 77th and brought the buildings closer to 77th;
Added a 3rd public connection to the Park and Nine Mile Creek Trail along the west lot line
Added a community dog park;
Added a community garden, park benches and public artwork;
Improved the architecture with 5th floor setbacks and terraces. Variations in balcony
setback and styles. Added a 5th floor club room and outdoor terrace over-looking the park.
More contemporary design with glass corners;
Dedicated land for the Park, including a new driveway connection to the Park including
landscaped boulevards, area monument sign, in/out drive lines, parallel parking, 10 foot bike
pedestrian trail and perimeter boulevards; and
Chase will be building the Park Access road and dedicate the right-of-way to the City in the
Phase 1 improvements.
Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone,
meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has considerable discretion when reviewing
this application.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Fred Richards Park; zoned Park and Guided Open Space/Park.
Easterly: Office uses; zoned POD, Planned Office District and guided OR, Office Residential.
STAFF REPORT Page 3
Southerly: Office/Industrial Uses; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District and guided OR,
Office Residential.
Westerly: Mixed Use apartments and Retail; zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District and
guided OR, Office Residential.
Existing Site Features
The proposed redevelopment site is 10.8 acres in size, is relatively flat and contains 4 office
buildings that would be removed. The overall site is 28.91 acres in size and contains a variety of
office buildings.
Planning
Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential.
Zoning: MDD-6, Mixed Development District
Parking
Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1311, 1.25 fully enclosed spaces and .75
surface spaces are required per dwelling unit. (2 spaces per unit.) Therefore, the 360 unit
apartment would require 720 parking spaces, 450 enclosed. The applicant is proposing 553
stalls with 423 enclosed stalls and 130 surface stalls. An additional 56 stalls are available as part
of the shared parking arrangement with Fred Richards.
For the senior housing .5 surface stalls and .25 enclosed stalls are required for parking.
Therefore, the 225 unit senior apartment would require 168 stalls; 112 surface stalls and 56
enclosed. The applicant proposes 194 stalls including 135 enclosed stalls and 59 surface stalls.
WSB conducted a parking study and determined that 493 spaces would be adequate for the
market rate apartments and 133 stalls for the senior housing. (See attached study.) Therefore,
the amount of parking proposed for the development is adequate.
Site Circulation/Access/Traffic
Access to the proposed development would be off 77th Street. Access would also be provided
directly off 77th into Fred Richards Park. This would improve access and visibility to the Park,
compared to the existing access off Parklawn. (See attached.) WSB also conducted a traffic
study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project subject
to the following road improvement:
1. Addition of a westbound right turn lane on W. 77th Street at the East Site access/Fred
Richards Park entrance.
This improvement would be required as a condition of any approval.
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Per the existing development agreement with the property owner in 2014 was that the
applicant/landowner is responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street with the
construction of 100,000 square feet. Staff would recommend that that same condition apply to
this new proposal. Final plans would be subject to the recommendations in the WSB traffic
study and approval of the city engineer.
Landscaping
Based on the perimeter of the site, 75 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans
show that 102 overstory trees would be planted. A full complement of understory shrubs and
bushes are also proposed. Every overstory tree on the subject property would be removed. At
full build out of the project, the landscaping would be a vast improvement over existing
landscaping and trees.
Grading/Drainage/Utilities
While there are some above ground stormwater management areas, the majority of the
stormwater would be stored and treated underground. One of the primary goals of the
redevelopment of this site contemplated in 2014 was as follows:
“A majority of the storm water retention shall be developed as an amenity and integrated into the
overall development.”
Staff does not believe this goal has been met. The stormwater is not “integrated” into the
development. Staff does acknowledge that improvements have been made with the stormwater
areas along the west and north lot lines. There are opportunities to expand water features to
the regional trail. Additionally the parking stalls along the park would be constructed with
pervious pavers.
The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and has offered recommendations and
condition outlined in the attached memo. A site improvement plan agreement would be
required for the construction/repair of the public drive to the park, sidewalks and utilities. Any
approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site.
Building/Building Material
The building materials would be a combination of brick, stone, and glass, with metal panel
accents. The applicant will have a materials board for review at the Planning Commission
meeting.
Sustainability
The applicant has filled out the sustainability questionnaire. (See attached.) The City’s
sustainability coordinator has reviewed the proposed plans and has made several
recommendations to improve the project. (See attached memo.) Should the City approve this
STAFF REPORT Page 5
project, a condition of approval should be to include the recommendations of the City’s
sustainability coordinator.
Mechanical Equipment
Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent
property lines.
Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures
Loading and trash areas would be in the underground garage. There would be two elevators up
in the garage area for each building.
Building Height
The building height requirement for this site is 4 stories and 48 feet. (See attached building
height overlay district map.) The applicant is requesting flexibility from this standard through
the PUD rezoning, to allow 5 stories and 60 feet.
Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration
Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities.
(a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and
encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following
improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the
approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant
to article V of this chapter:
(1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails
wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout
the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the
applicant's property:
a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and
b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks
and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other
existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities.
(2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks
or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section.
(3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining
properties where appropriate.
(4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit
stations or transit stops adjoining the property.
(5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer.
(6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement
of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where
bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum
number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile
STAFF REPORT Page 6
parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces
and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the
city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50
feet of a public entrance to a principal building.
(b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be
borne by the applicant.
The proposal would enhance pedestrian, bike and vehicular connections in the area. A
boulevard sidewalk is proposed along 77th street; there would be four pedestrian connections
and a bike access to Fred Richards Park to the north. (See attached plans.) A vehicular entrance
to the Park is also proposed. The additional 590 residential units would increase and enhance
pedestrian movement in the area. There would be dedicated bike storage and a bike
maintenance area in the apartments.
COMPLIANCE TABLE
While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table
demonstrates compliance with the current MDD-6 zoning:
*Does not meet City Code
City Standard (MDD-6) Proposed
(Rough Estimates)
Setbacks - Buildings
Front Setback
35 feet + ½ foot for each
foot the building height
exceeds minimum setback
60 feet Required
32 & 35 feet (77th Street)*
114 feet (Fred Richards Park)
100 Feet (west side)
Building Height 4 stories and 48 feet 5 stories and 60 feet*
Parking lot and drive
aisle setback
20 feet (street)
10 feet (park)
5 feet (side)
20 feet
10-30 feet (Fred Richards
Park)
20 feet
Building Coverage 30% 22%
Maximum Floor Area
Ratio (FAR)
50% - Non-residential Uses
50% - Residential Uses
473,061 SF Total
540,000 s.f. all
residential* (Compliant if
the Pentagon Park South
Parcel is included)
Parking Stalls – All Age
Senior
1.25 enclosed per unit (450)
.75 surface per unit (270)
.25 enclosed per unit (112)
.50 surface per unit (56)
423 enclosed proposed*
130 surface proposed*
194 enclosed
59 surface
STAFF REPORT Page 7
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment – Density
To accommodate the request, the following Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office
Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. The Office
Residential area is located west of France Avenue and into the Pentagon Park
Area.
The OR, Office Residential Area guides up to 30 units per acre. This density is low given the
density that has been considered as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study. Densities that have
been contemplated to date have been 80 units per acre over the whole of the district. The thinking
behind that density has been to allow greater densities in between France and York (100-125 units
per acre; the CAC, Community Activity Center allows up to 105 units per acre in the existing
Comprehensive Plan); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York.
The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre;
and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project
(senior housing) is 80 units per acre.
Below is table of existing high density developments in the City. Note that the trend in multi-
family development is higher density. This is due to the high cost of land in Edina, the City’s
requirement for affordable housing, and the added cost of redeveloping a site with existing
buildings.
High Density Development in Edina
Development Address Units Units Per Acre
Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45
The Durham 7201 York 264 46
7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36
South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42
The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22
6500 France – Senior
Housing
6500 France 188 80
Lennar - Onyx 6725 York 240 52
7250 France Project 7250 France 135 80
Pentagon Park North 4820, 4510-4660 77th
Street West, and 7600
Parklawn Avenue
1500 52
5000 France 5000 France 23 29
STAFF REPORT Page 8
Hazelton Road Apartments 3650 Hazelton
Road
186 150
Bus Garage – Trammel Crow Eden Avenue 165 100
Gateway Point 66th & York 191 96
The Millennium 66th & York 372 60
Lincoln Residences 5901 Lincoln
Drive
250 30
Red – Indicates recent projects
Example Residential Density Ranges in Surrounding City’s Comprehensive Plans
City Range – Per Acre
Bloomington
Medium Density Residential 5-10
High Density Residential No limit
General Business 0-83
Commercial
(Community & Regional)
0-83
High Intense mix use 0-60
Airport South mix use 30-131
Richfield
Medium Density Residential 7-12
High Density Residential Minimum of 24
High Density Res./Office Minimum of 24
Mixed Use 50+
St. Louis Park
Medium Density Residential 6-30
High Density Residential 20-75 (PUD for high end)
Mixed Use 20-75 (PUD for high end)
Commercial 20-50
Minnetonka
Medium Density Residential 4-12
High Density Residential 12+
Mixed Use No range established (density
based on site location and site
conditions.)
Minneapolis
Medium Density (mixed use) 20-50
High Density (mixed use) 50-120
Very High Density(mixed use) 120+
STAFF REPORT Page 9
The site’s location on an arterial roadway provides a good location for higher density. The
Comprehensive Plan currently suggests allowing higher density subject to proximity to utilities
capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to
allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space,
affordable housing, sustainable design principles, pedestrian circulation, and podium height.
The proposed project would contain some of these elements. There is adequate utility capacity
available. A traffic study was done by WSB and concludes the existing roads could support the
development subject to roadway improvements. (See attached study.) WSB has also done a traffic
study of the entire Southdale Area, and also concludes that the proposed density could be
supported by the roadway network.
The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be accomplished as follows (this
language was denied by the City Council as part of the 7250 France Project):
OR
Office-
Residential
No current
examples in City.
Potential
examples include
Pentagon Park
area and other I-
494 corridor
locations
Transitional areas along major
thoroughfares or between higher-
intensity districts and residential
districts. Many existing highway-
oriented commercial areas are
anticipated to transition to this
more mixed-use character.
Primary uses are offices, attached
or multifamily housing.
Secondary uses: Limited retail and
service uses (not including “big
box” retail), limited industrial
(fully enclosed), institutional uses,
parks and open space. Vertical
mixed use should be encouraged,
and may be required on larger
sites.
Upgrade existing streetscape
and building appearance,
improve pedestrian and
transit environment.
Encourage structured
parking and open space
linkages where feasible;
emphasize the enhancement
of the pedestrian
environment.
12-30 residential dwelling units/acre
The City Council may approve a project for
up to 80 units per acre through a PUD or
rezoning. Criteria to justify greater density
includes: Addressing the City’s Working
Principles for Development Building quality,
sustainability, pedestrian oriented
development, additional public space and
public realm, provision of more green space,
underground parking, affordable housing,
proximity to low density uses, utilities
capacity, level of transit service available, and
impact on adjacent roads.
Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code:
maximum of 0.5 to 1.0
Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case
by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities
capacity, level of transit service available, and
impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items
to allow greater density or density on the high
end of the residential housing range above,
would include: Below grade parking,
provision of park or open space, affordable
housing, sustainable design principles,
provision of public art, pedestrian circulation,
and podium height.
STAFF REPORT Page 10
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD:
1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive
procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site
plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The
decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council
to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include
most or all of the following:
a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning
districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a
development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan;
b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City,
while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety,
comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City;
c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in
order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time
incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the
effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable
design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special
construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management,
pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to
residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses;
d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land
uses, including both existing and planned;
e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities;
f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland
protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening;
g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development;
h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and
i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land
uses.
Some, but not all of the above criteria are included with this development proposal. There
is a proposed affordable housing element; however, there are no assurances of a specific
development. The proposal would provide improved vehicle and pedestrian connections to
the park. However, staff is not sure it would create a more creative and efficient approach
STAFF REPORT Page 11
to development of the site. As mentioned the site is divided up into very large block, unlike
the previous draft Overall Development Plan. On its own, this project is entirely residential
and not mixed use. That said, it would introduce a use to the area that currently does not
exist in Pentagon Park, but the use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Applicability/Criteria
a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses
allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts
defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within
a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the
Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is
designated as OR, Office Residential, which encourages a mixture of uses. Uses include:
Offices, attached or multifamily housing.
Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail),
Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger
sites.
The proposal is for an entirely residential development over the 28+ acres.
b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development
should be in compliance with the following:
i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1)
land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD
include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the
designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve
the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan;
This project would not be a mixed use development. Should the City approve this
project, staff would recommend that future phases be required to include a mixture
of office and/or retail.
ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be
permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of
this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan;
This is a single use PUD proposal. However, that use is allowed in the
Comprehensive Plan. After development of the first phase the uses would be mixed
with the existing office the east and the new residential. As mentioned above, future
development phases should be encouraged to be a mixture of uses, including retail
and office.
STAFF REPORT Page 12
iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate
planned development designation and shall be in general conformance
with the Comprehensive Plan; and
The uses allowed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The densities
contemplated are consistent with discussions by the Greater Southdale Area
Visioning. Additionally, the WSB traffic study concludes that the surrounding
roadways could support the use subject to conditions.
iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the
most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered
presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the
purpose and intent described in #1 above.
The table on page 6 shows how the proposed new buildings would comply with the
MDD-6 Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in the new PUD-16
District. Flexibility is requested in regard to building height, setbacks, FAR and
parking standards. In relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described
in #1 above should be met.
The area would be improved from existing conditions on the site, and the pedestrian
and vehicle connections to the park would be improved. There also would be an
increase in green space. The applicant is proposing future affordable housing on
another site within the development.
AUAR (Alternative Urban Areawide Review)
As part of a rezoning of the Pentagon Park Area to MDD-6, Mixed Use
Development, an AUAR, Environmental Study was completed in 2007, to examine
impacts of the proposed development, and development scenarios beyond the
densities suggested by the development.
The proposed development in 2007 was to tear down the buildings on the Pentagon
Tower and Pentagon Quads site and build the following:
634 senior housing units
An 80,000 square foot hotel
Two office towers that would total 737,000 square feet, and two above
ground parking structures.
The proposed project was never developed; and the property ownership has since
changed to Hillcrest Development. The study was updated in 2013 to consider the
Hillcrest proposal. (See attached.) The following is a breakdown of the anticipated
land uses at that time:
Office – 1,420,000 square feet.
Retail – 40,000 square feet.
STAFF REPORT Page 13
Hotel – 250,000 square feet (375-425 rooms)
Parking structures – 6,400 parking stalls.
Housing (would replace some of the office if built.)
An AUAR allows the flexibility to examine different development scenarios, including
what would be allowed under the current zoning and comprehensive plan; and other
development scenarios, including, what the developer is considering. An AUAR
enables cities to evaluate how much development can be accommodated in an area
without significant environmental impacts.
The proposed housing development is consistent with the residential scenario
contemplated. (See page scenario 2&4, Figure 4-2&4.4 in the attached AUAR.)
Essentially, residential uses are replacing the office square footage contemplated.
Housing would have a lesser impact on traffic in the area.
PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Primary Issues
• Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density reasonable?
Yes. Staff believes the proposed amendment is reasonable for the following reasons:
1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally
located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th
street which connects France Avenue to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial
roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area.
2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study
have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is
contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the
existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per
acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east
side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the
west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre.
3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding
communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis
Park.
4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable
housing units.
5. Traffic studies done by WSB conclude that densities contemplated on the west side of
France can be supported by the existing roadway system. (See attached Greater Southdale
Area Transportation Study & the AUAR.)
STAFF REPORT Page 14
• Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site?
Staff recognizes that this site has some significant development challenges to redevelop. There
is a high water table and peat soils, which prevents a significant amount of parking to go
underground. The soils are very poor for re-development. Pilings would be required due to the
peaty soils. Pilings would add significant development cost to the project. Also, the City is
requesting shared parking along the park and a new entrance to the park.
While the applicant has done a nice job addressing the difficult site development issues, and has
tried to respond to the comments from the Planning Commission and City Council Sketch Plan
review, staff does not believe a PUD is justified in this instance for the following reasons:
1. The proposal does not adequately address the guiding principles established with the
Preliminary Rezoning for this site. The principles include providing: Green Streets,
Integrated Stormwater, Pedestrian Friendly 77th, Connections from West to East,
Multimodal Connections and shared parking. The streets are not necessarily “green;” the
parkway shown on the approved preliminary plan is a traditional two-way driveway with
parking on both sides.
One the conditions of Preliminary Rezoning for this site in 2014 was as follows:
“A majority of the storm water retention shall be developed as an amenity and integrated into the
overall development.”
Staff does not believe this condition has been met; the stormwater plan primarily addresses
the issue by storing and treating the water underground and is not necessarily “integrated”
into the development. Staff does acknowledge that improvements have been made with the
stormwater areas along the west and north lot lines; and there is more opportunity in this
area to integrate into the Park.
The proposal is a vast improvement to the pedestrian movement in the area. The east-west
connection would begin to be improved with the boulevard style sidewalk on the north side
of 77th. In regard to multimodal connections the applicant is showing a bus stop along 77th
Street, and has provided bike connections to the regional trail through the development.
The shared parking appears to be provided more for the residential use and not users of
the park.
2. The applicant has addressed the Greater Southdale Area Development Principles; however,
the overall development plan does not meet the development of smaller block principles.
The size of these blocks is more like 400 x 600 feet as opposed to 200 x 200 feet suggest in
the Framework Vision. The previously approved Overall Development for this site in 2014
better addressed the Development Principles and divided the site into 18 blocks; the
proposal divides the site into 7 blocks.
Mic Johnson, has provided a review of the project and offered the following issues:
STAFF REPORT Page 15
The site plan does not conform to the approved preliminary PUD. The current plan
has buildings with facades in excess of 400 feet long, with correspondingly long interior
corridors. On grade parking surrounds all buildings. The distance between buildings
with access streets is approximately 150 feet, all of which create a very low density.
Architecture variety and interest is limited to one style, with small variations creating a
mundane and non-transformative architectural expression that will easily look dated.
There is minimal variety in programming of the ground floor. Services are limited to
basic apartment needs without the opportunity for diverse activities such as coffee
shops, cafes, etc. This does not reinforce the vision of a more lively and prosperous
social/cultural experience within the Pentagon Park neighborhood.
Streets throughout the proposal are not streets but rather access to on-grade parking.
All streets become the same instead of offering a variety of diverse use and landscaped
pedestrian ways through the site. Each street could have a specific identity that would
encourage a diversity of uses and appropriateness for social interaction.
Courtyards are themed but do not indicate an overall theme or connection to one
another through specific pedestrian connection and/or street address.
The shared parking on the north edge of the development puts cars facing the park. It
is not integrated into the park, nor does it promote a larger connection east-west
pedestrian such as a promenade, specific connections to the new buildings, or an
overall characteristic that would communicate the development’s unique relationship
to the park.
Although the images used to promote the ideal characteristics that the proposal
attempts to convey, there is a lack of integration of these ideas into an overall plan. As
an example, not one of the images shows cars around three primary sides of the
development—as is demonstrated in this proposal. In our opinion, this proposal depicts
a more typical suburban development, which may not be in alignment with the city’s
broader goals of a more vibrant, mixed-use community within the Pentagon Park
neighborhood.
3. The proposal does not adequately meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. (See pages 10-12
of this report.) The proposal would not create a more creative and efficient approach to
development of the site. As mentioned above, the Overall Development Plan proposal
divides the property up into 7 very large blocks, rather than 18 as recommended in the
2014 Preliminary Rezoning/Overall Development Plan for the site. The City’s sustainability
coordinator has reviewed the proposal and has offered recommendations to improve
sustainability. (See attached memo dated May 2, 2018.)
4. On its own, this project is entirely residential and not mixed use.
5. Lack of affordable housing within the project. While the proposal is to construct100 units of
affordable housing within the overall development, staff is concerned that there are no
guarantees for this future development. Should the City approve the project staff would
recommend the following conditions be placed to ensure meeting the City’s affordable
housing policy:
Prior to issuance of a building permit, $100,000 per unit, or $5.46 million must be
submitted to the City in the form of a cash escrow, letter of credit, or bond to
STAFF REPORT Page 16
ensure that affordable housing occurs within the development. These monies would
be given back to the property owner upon delivering the affordable housing units
within the development that would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. If the
property owner does not deliver the affordable units within 3 years, the City would
use cash in the money to be used elsewhere in the City to deliver affordable
housing.
The Zoning Ordinance establishing the PUD-16 Zoning District shall designate 4820
77th Street as an affordable housing site.
Conclusion/Recommendation
As this is a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, the City has substantial
discretion as to approving or denying this request. (See the pyramid of discretion on page.)
Below are the alternative actions to be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Approval
Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as
follows:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office
Residential District in the Greater Southdale Area from 30 units per acre to
80 units per acre; and
Approval is based upon the following findings:
1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is
generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-
494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are
arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated
for this area.
2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area
Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density
is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per
acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities
50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater
densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is
52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior
housing) is 80 units per acre.
STAFF REPORT Page 17
3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding
communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St.
Louis Park.
4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable
housing units.
5. Traffic studies done by WSB conclude that densities contemplated on the west side
of France to Pentagon Park can be supported by the existing roadway system.
Denial
Recommend the City Council deny the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Denial is
based on the following findings:
1. The area west of France and south of the Fred Richard Park is considered a transition area
between the high density commercial development on the east side of France and South of
77th Street and the single family homes to the west and north.
2. The density proposed is too high for this area.
Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Overall Development Plan
& Preliminary Development Plan
Approval
Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed
Development District to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall
Development Plan and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1.
Approval is subject to the following findings:
1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass.
3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the
site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council.
4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning
Framework Vision. The following principles are included:
Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site and
connect to the Regional Trail and Fred Richards Park to the north.
Provides the potential for additional public space along the north lot line in
conjunction with Fred Richards Park;
Opportunity to provide increased stormwater and ponding features in connection to
Fred Richards Park;
STAFF REPORT Page 18
High quality building design; and
The potential for significant affordable housing in a future phase of development.
5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan:
a. Movement Patterns.
Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent
neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways.
Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-
scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.)
A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern
discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship
between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement.
b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure
and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character.
c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and
the larger region.
d. Increase mixed-use development overall in Pentagon Park where supported by
adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify
the tax base.
e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between
neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation
infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car.
f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian
scale.
g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a
consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian
environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of
liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement.
h. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather
than between buildings and the street.
6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic
and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be
supported by the existing roads and proposed parking, subject to conditions.
7. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would:
a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved
sidewalks and connections to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and Fred Richard
Park. The project would bring more vibrancy to the area.
b. The building would be of high quality brick architectural metal, stone, and glass.
c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site,
unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council.
d. Project could significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock in the future.
e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the
Comprehensive Plan.
f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts.
STAFF REPORT Page 19
8. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site.
Approval is subject to the following Conditions:
1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development
Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission.
2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of
the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be
submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required
landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit.
3. Work with the City to expand the public space north of the parking area into the Fred
Richards Park including expansion of the dog park area, pedestrian connection and
stormwater retention.
4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City
Code.
5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code.
6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require
revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements.
7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval.
8. A letter of credit, cash escrow or bond in the amount of $5.46 million must be submitted to
the City prior to the issuance of a building permit to ensure that affordable housing occurs
within the development prior to issuance of a building permit. These monies would be given
back to the property owner upon delivering the affordable housing units within the
development that would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. If the property owner
does not deliver the affordable units within 3 years, the City would cash in the money to be
used elsewhere in the City to deliver affordable housing.
9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the sustainability coordinator’s memo dated
May 2, 2018.
10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated
May 3, 2018.
11. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th Street
is required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the applicant/landowner
is responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans would be subject to the
recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer.
12. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations.
STAFF REPORT Page 20
13. All crosswalks shall be marked with ground-in premark preformed thermoplastic in a
standard or “continental” pattern per Edina Standard Plate No. 716 to clearly identify the
pedestrian crossings.
14. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-16, Planned Unit
Development for this site.
15. Dedication of public access easements along the entrance to Fred Richards Park and the drive
aisle and parking stalls along the north lot line subject to review and approval of the city
attorney. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the Park.
16. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density.
Denial
Recommend the City Council deny the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development
District to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan
and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1, subject to the following findings:
1. The proposal does not adequately address the guiding principles regarding Green Streets,
Integrated Stormwater, Pedestrian Friendly 77th Street, Connections from West to East,
Multimodal Connections and Shared Parking.
2. The proposal does not adequately integrate stormwater into the development.
3. The overall development plan does not meet the Greater Southdale Area development
principle of redeveloping property into smaller blocks. The size of these blocks is more like
400 x 600 feet as opposed to 200 x 200 feet suggest in the Framework Vision. The previously
approved Overall Development for this site in 2014 better addressed the Development
Principles and divided the site into 18 blocks; the proposal divides the site into 7 blocks.
4. The proposal does not meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning, including a lack of mixed uses;
no affordable housing in Phase 1; no creative or efficient development of the site; lack of
creative stormwater management; no podium height.
5. Lack of affordable housing within the project.
6. The current zoning, MDD-6 provides a reasonable use of the property and is consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff Recommendation:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density to up to 80
units an acre in the OR, Office Residential District.
STAFF REPORT Page 21
Rezoning to PUD
Based on the findings outlined above, staff recommends denial of the proposed Rezoning to PUD.
Deadline for a city decision: August 7, 2018
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 1 of 18
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Planning Commission
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
May 9, 2018
I. Call To Order
Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M.
II. Roll Call
Answering the roll were: Miranda, Lee, Strauss, Mittal, Jones, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube,
Olsen. Staff Present: Cary Teague, City Planner, Kris Aaker and Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planners, Kaylin
Eidsness, Communications Coord, Jackie Hoogenakker, Support Staff
Absent from the roll: Todd Thorsen
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Commissioner Miranda moved to approve the May 9, 2018, Planning Commission Agenda. Commissioner
Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Commissioner Strauss moved to approve the April 25, 2018, meeting minutes. Commissioner Berube
seconded the motion. Commissioners Lee and Berube offered a change to the April 25th meeting minutes.
Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
V. Public Hearings
D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan
for Pentagon Park North. (4820, 4510-4660 77th Street West and 7600 Parklawn Avenue, Edina,
MN
Staff Presentation
Planner Teague reported that Pentagon Revival LLC is requesting an all-housing redevelopment of the
Pentagon Park parcels located north of 77th Street. All parcels combined the site is 28.91 acres in size.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 2 of 18
A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for these parcels
for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and no Final Development
Plan was approved.
Teague noted that the use and overall development plan proposed for the north parcel (residential) is
very different than the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). At that time, however,
the Planning Commission and City Council both expressed a desire to develop this site with some
residential uses to create a mixed-use development. Residential uses are permitted under the current
MDD-6 zoning designation. The approved preliminary plan contemplated four stories adjacent to Fred
Richards Park, and five stories on 77th Street. The Comprehensive Plan allows up to 12 stories; while
the current Zoning Ordinance maximum is four stories.
At full development build out, the project would include 1,500 new housing units. The overall density
would be 52 units per acre.
The first phase of the project is proposed by Chase Real Estate Group to develop a 10.86-acre portion
of the site (4600-4660 77th Street west), with a 360-unit market rate apartment and a 225-unit senior
apartment (585 total units). As proposed, the development would require the following:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density from 30 to 80 units per acre. (This
amendment is currently under consideration by the City Council as part of the 7250 France
Avenue project and will be acted on May 15th); and
Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development.
Teague explained that the applicant for the first phase does not intend to provide any affordable
housing within the project. Pentagon Revival is proposing to dedicate the 4820 site for a 100-unit
affordable housing project. However, there is not a development partner that has been signed to
construct that housing at this time.
The Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The applicant has
responded. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson has also
reviewed the plans and provided feedback. .
The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City
Council and based on feedback from the Planning Commission, the City Council, the applicant has:
Removed two surface lots, including one on 77th Street;
Decreased private parking from 310 to 207 surface stalls;
Increased the shared Park Parking from 40 to 93 stalls;
Increased the underground parking from 442 to 558 stalls;
Increase courtyard size, opened up more landscape view, broke up the mass of the buildings;
Market-rate plaza entry and corner off West 77th and lobby + common spaces to spill out on
for more glass store-front architecture and active corner;
Increased green space along 77th and brought the buildings closer to 77th;
Added a 3rd public connection to the Park and Nine Mile Creek Trail along the west lot line
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 3 of 18
Added a community dog park;
Added a community garden, park benches and public artwork;
Improved the architecture with 5th floor setbacks and terraces. Variations in balcony setback
and styles. Added a 5th floor clubroom and outdoor terrace over-looking the park. More
contemporary design with glass corners;
Dedicated land for the Park, including a new driveway connection to the Park including
landscaped boulevards, area monument sign, in/out drive lines, parallel parking, 10 foot bike
pedestrian trail and perimeter boulevards; and
Chase will be building the Park Access road and dedicate the right-of-way to the City in the
Phase 1 improvements.
Planner Teague noted to accommodate the request; the following Comprehensive Plan amendment is
requested:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office
Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. The Office
Residential area is located west of France Avenue and into the Pentagon Park
Area.
Teague explained that the OR, Office Residential Area guides up to 30 units per acre. This density is
low given the density that has been considered as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study. Densities
that have been contemplated to date have been 80 units per acre over the whole of the district. The
thinking behind that density has been to allow greater densities in between France and York (100-125
units per acre; the CAC, Community Activity Center allows up to 105 units per acre in the existing
Comprehensive Plan); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The
City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the
Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing)
is 80 units per acre.
Teague stated he would provide findings to support both approval and denial of the Comprehensive
Plan Amendments as follows:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office
Residential District in the Greater Southdale Area from 30 units per acre to 80
units per acre; and
If the Commissioner recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment , approval is based
upon the following findings:
1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located
on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th street which
connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is
consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area.
2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have
been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 4 of 18
between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area
allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and
East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105
units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on
France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre.
3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed-use areas for surrounding
communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park.
4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing
units.
If the Commission recommends denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, denial would be based
on the following:
1. The area west of France and south of the Fred Richard Park is considered a transition area
between the high-density commercial development on the east side of France and South of 77th
Street and the single-family homes to the west and north.
2. The density proposed is too high for this area.
Continuing, Teague further informed the Commission he drafted language to support or to deny the
rezoning request.
If the Commission recommends Rezoning approval the approval should be subject to the following
findings:
1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass.
3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the
site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council.
4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework
Vision. The following principles are included:
Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site and
connect to the Regional Trail and Fred Richards Park to the north.
Provides the potential for additional public space along the north lot line in conjunction
with Fred Richards Park;
Opportunity to provide increased stormwater and ponding features in connection to
Fred Richards Park;
High quality building design; and
The potential for significant affordable housing in a future phase of development.
5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan:
a. Movement Patterns.
Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods
along secondary streets or walkways.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 5 of 18
Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale
lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.)
A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern
discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship
between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement.
b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure
and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character.
c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the
larger region.
d. Increase mixed-use development overall in Pentagon Park where supported by adequate
infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base.
e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between
neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure
and reduce dependence on the car.
f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale.
g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a
consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian
environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of
liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement.
h. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than
between buildings and the street.
6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic and
parking impact study, and concluded that the existing roads could support the proposed
development and proposed parking, subject to conditions.
7. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would:
a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved
sidewalks and connections to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and Fred Richard Park.
The project would bring more vibrancy to the area.
b. The building would be of high quality brick architectural metal, stone, and glass.
c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless
an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council.
d. Project could significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock in the future.
e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the
Comprehensive Plan.
f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts.
8. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site.
Rezoning approval would also be subject to the following Conditions:
1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development
Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission.
2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the
Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 6 of 18
one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or
erosion control measures at the time of any building permit.
3. Work with the City to expand the public space north of the parking area into the Fred Richards
Park including expansion of the dog park area, pedestrian connection and stormwater retention.
4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City
Code.
5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code.
6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions
to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements.
7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval.
8. A letter of credit, cash escrow or bond in the amount of $5.85 million be submitted to the City
prior to the issuance of a building permit to ensure that affordable housing occurs within the
development prior to issuance of a building permit. These monies would be given back to the
property owner upon delivering the affordable housing units within the development that would
meet the City’s affordable housing policy. If the property owner does not deliver the affordable
units within 3 years, the City would cash in the money to be used elsewhere in the City to
deliver affordable housing.
9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the sustainability coordinator’s memo dated
May 2, 2018.
10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May
3, 2018.
11. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th Street is
required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the applicant/landowner is
responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans would be subject to the
recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer.
12. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations.
13. All crosswalks shall be marked with ground-in premark preformed thermoplastic in a standard or
“continental” pattern per Edina Standard Plate No. 716 to clearly identify the pedestrian
crossings.
14. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development
for this site.
15. Dedication of public access easements along the entrance to Fred Richards Park and the drive
aisle and parking stalls along the north lot line subject to review and approval of the city attorney.
The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the Park.
16. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density.
If the Commission recommends Rezoning denial, denial is based on the following:
Teague stated staff recommends that the City Council deny the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6,
Mixed Development District to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall
Development Plan and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1, subject to the following findings:
1. The proposal does not adequately address the guiding principles regarding Green Streets, Integrated
Stormwater, Pedestrian Friendly 77th Street, Connections from West to East, Multimodal Connections and
Shared Parking.
2. The proposal does not adequately integrate stormwater into the development.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 7 of 18
3. The overall development plan does not meet the Greater Southdale Area development principle
of redeveloping property into smaller blocks. The size of these blocks is more like 400 x 600 feet
as opposed to 200 x 200 feet suggest in the Framework Vision. The previously approved Overall
Development for this site in 2014 better addressed the Development Principles and divided the
site into 18 blocks; the proposal divides the site into 7 blocks.4. The proposal does not meet
the City’s criteria for PUD zoning, including a lack of mixed uses; no affordable housing in Phase 1;
no creative or efficient development of the site; lack of creative stormwater management; no
podium height.
5. Lack of affordable housing within the project.
6. The current zoning, MDD-6 provides a reasonable use of the property and is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
In conclusion, Teague stated staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to
increase density to up to 80 units an acre in the OR, Office Residential District. Teague further stated
that staff recommends denial of the proposed Rezoning to PUD.
Appearing for the Applicant
Scott Takenoff and Kristina Smitten Hillcrest Development, Joe McElwain and Andy Chase, Chase Real
Estate
Discussion/Comments/Questions
Commissioners expressed disappointment that affordable housing was not included in this phase and
the difficulty in approving housing without assurances that affordable housing would be built in future
phases.
It was noted that the MDD-6 zoning designation would continue to work for this project questioning
the reasoning behind the request for PUD zoning. Teague agreed that the MDD would work for this
project; however, PUD is a tool the City can use to provide affordable housing.
Concern was expressed on the parking and that access to the park needs to be more visible.
Applicant Presentation
Scott Takenoff addressed the Commission and noted that much has changed since their 2014 proposal.
Takenoff stated that the site continues to have its challenges, one being the floodplain and the projects
interaction with the Fred Richards Golf Course the “Fred” and the 9-mile trail. Takenoff stated this is
a big project that would be redeveloped in phases.
Kristina Smitten gave a brief history of the property, adding in her opinion this area is very different
from France Avenue. She noted that 77th Street is an east/west truck route. Smitten shared the
following:
• The properties are divided by West 77th Street
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 8 of 18
• The subject properties are near France and the Greater Southdale Area; however there are
differences
• Tenants have been consolidated in 6 of the office buildings. Occupancy is at 90% in those
buildings.
• 4 blighted buildings remain; however they can be repositioned to office space if needed.
• The south tower was demolished in 2015.
• The project follows the principles established for the Pentagon Park area and for the Greater
Southdale area.
• The project in its entirety provides for flexibility of uses
• The north properties are proposed as housing in keeping with the suggestions from the City
Council in 2014.
• Through numerous neighborhood meetings, the residents of the area expressed the opinion that
they are comfortable with the housing option on the north properties.
• Although 4820 is not part of this redevelopment proposal that site is earmarked for the
affordable housing units (workforce or senior)
• There will be connectivity between north south/east west.
• The redevelopment would be pedestrian and bike friendly.
• Access to trail and park would be provided for not only the residents of the new apartment
complex but by the public.
• The addition of sidewalks linking properties.
• Living street elements would be incorporated into the project.
• Access to the “Fred” would follow the living streets guide for both pedestrian and bikes.
• Storm water management would be addressed and efficiently measured in the transition zone.
Celebrating water as previously thought would be very difficult.
• Not much can be done to mitigate the flooding issues; however, will work closely with the
Watershed District and the City.
• Visitors can use the pentagon parking to park for the “Fred”.
• Master Plan for the Fred approved in 2017. Access to the Fred comes from this project.
• Enhanced bus stops is important.
• Public art would be incorporated.
Andy Chase addressed the Commission and explained his company has built over 2000 single-family
homes and apartments. Chase clarified that his Company is not “dodging” the affordable housing
requirement, adding their task within the overall development plan was to construct market rate
apartment homes and senior continuum care suites. Chase said they build to own and introduced Joe
McElwain to present the project.
Mr. McElwain told the Commission he is very happy to introduce Sienna on the Park. McElwain said
their goal is to “kick-start” a new residential community in this location. McElwain noted that the site
as it exists is a difficult site to redevelop because of the high water table, the 100-year flood plain and
unsuitable soils. Mr. McElwain presented the following on the development proposal:
• Buildings would be constructed closer to the street.
• No parking lots along West 77th Street
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 9 of 18
• Increased shared parking.
• Increased underground parking from 442 to 558 stalls
• Increased courtyard sizes to open up the site to more landscaped views and to better expose the
transition between the project and park.
• Sidewalk connections to West 77th, Nine-Mile Creek and the “Fred”.
• Enhanced right-of-way connections and enhanced center boulevard
• All water would be kept on the property.
• Exterior building materials composed of brick, metal panel and concrete masonry.
• Buildings would have inset balconies.
• Meandering north drive.
• Addition of artwork.
• The site would allow residents to experience outdoor living
• Building height at 5-stories is the correct height.
• Residents would be able to experience living in a beautiful park like location with access to
amenities.
McElwain concluded that they look forward to working with the City.
Discussion/Comments/Questions
• Commissioners asked the development team to identify where public parking would occur for
the park. McElwain pointed out that the shared stall. abut their north property line with the
park
• Commissioners questioned if smaller building footprints would work to help accommodate a
water feature. Mr. Chase responded that developing a water feature would be difficult because
of the lowlands. Commissioners expressed disappointment that a water feature was not
included in the property reiterating that a different design could be considered to add that
feature and provide more transparency to the park.
• An opinion was expressed that the buildings and connections would provide a good pedestrian
experience; however, there is nowhere to go. It was noted that no retail component was
added to this proposal. Mr. McElwain agreed there is no mixed use with this proposed;
however, the senior building would provide dining experiences for the residents and residents
would also have full amenities to include a library. The market rate apartments would have
amenities and they envision rooftop space and work from home areas. McElwain said he is sure
that, as the Pentagon Park site is redeveloped that more mixed use would be introduced;
noting the mixed use proposed on the south parcel.
• The applicant was asked if there would be townhouse units incorporated into one of these
buildings. McElwain said there would be no townhouses; however, there would be first floor
walkouts. All units would be rental. It was mentioned that different housing types are needed
in the City, noting many apartments have recently been built in Edina. Affordable housing was
also a goal of the City. Mr. Chase commented with regard to affordable housing that he is
confident that affordable housing would be developed in Pentagon Park. He explained that the
affordable housing process takes time and as previously mentioned by Ms. Smitten that
affordable housing is planned for 4820.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 10 of 18
A discussion ensued on the proposals connection to the “Fred” with Commissioners expressing the
opinion that the connections could be better and more transparent. Commissioners said if it would be
difficult for visitors to find a way to access the park from 77th Street. The lack of affordable housing
was also of concern to Commissioners. Commissioners also noted there are some concerns that
were expressed by Mic Johnson, City Consultant for the Greater Southdale Area.
Mr. Takenoff explained that there is no issue in providing affordable housing; however, prior to the
affordable housing units being built these buildings need to be built to help facilitate construction of the
affordable units. Takenoff said they can provide a purchase agreement with Dominion, reiterating
affordable units cannot be built first and that Chase was only responsible for the senior and market
rate housing on this site.
Commissioners asked Planner Teague if Pentagon Park was considered part of the Greater Southdale
Area. Teague responded that had been discussed; however, it was not official. McElwain told the
Commission it was difficult to respond to a third party adding their discussions have been with City of
Edina staff; however, they have responded to the principles established for the greater Southdale area.
An opinion was expressed that the Commission thought they would see something different,
something for the future. This development could be missing the point especially without a mix of uses
and no assurances that the affordable housing would be built. Mr. McElwain said he could understand
their point; however, stressed their charge was to develop market rate and senior housing. It was felt
that this development project would “jump start” the redevelopment of the housing for the rest of
Pentagon Park to include the affordable component.
Smitten pointed out to the Commission the site to be redeveloped by Chase is only one part of the
whole. When considering redevelopment of the area Chase considered the principles established for
the Pentagon Park area and also considered the Greater Southdale Area Guiding Principles. Chase told
the Commission that he was sorry that he was not aware that their proposal would need to include
mixed use.
A discussion ensued on mixed use, where it was appropriate and if mixed use was still viable.
Tankenoff pointed out the Pentagon Park area has been blighted for 30 plus years, his company has
been renovating the offices adding the redevelopment vision for the entire site would include mixed
use to include office, housing, hotel, restaurant and other amenities. Takenoff stressed that they want
this project to work, adding they are very excited about the vision and would rather under promise
and over deliver.
Public Hearing
Chair Olsen opened the public hearing.
The following resident spoke regarding the proposal.
Jim Nelson, 7790 Lochmere Terrace, Edina, MN
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 11 of 18
Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Miranda
seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
Discussion/Comments/Questions
Commissioners shared the following:
• There was a concern expressed that long term promises could fall away.
• A goal for this project was to develop a community with less focus on the car. Focus on a more
modern redevelopment approach with public transit, pedestrian trails and bikes. Also safe and
easy access north/south. Less reliance on the vehicle.
• Trust is very important with this large redevelopment. Concern was expressed that what was
envisioned would not be achieved.
• Acknowledge that the vision for this important area was to develop a community; something
similar to the north loop, build a future community with amenities, parks, connectivity,
everything.
• Not a bad project; however, it was not what was envisioned. Affordable housing was a major
goal and again the City must rely on trust to ensure affordable units are built. This just appears
too piecemeal.
• Commissioners stated they continue to struggle; while the proposal for housing was good, this
plan just misses the vision for housing. Where is the bigger picture; how will it work, will it be
built.
The discussion continued with Commissioners suggesting that the requested approvals for
Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Rezoning be voted on separately. Support was
expressed for amending the Comprehensive Plan; however, a discussion ensued on if the amendment
could be site specific. A majority of the Commissioners indicated they could not support the
preliminary rezoning as presented, without a mix of uses and without assurances on the affordable
housing noting too much was left in the “air”.
Motion
Commissioner Hamilton moved to recommend the City Council approve of the request
for an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan based on staff findings and subject to staff
conditions. Ayes; Miranda, Strauss Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Olsen. Nays;
Lee. Motion carried.
Commissioner Lee explained she voted no because she believes there are better ways to approve an
increase in density instead of amending the entire OR District. Lee stated she believes any approval
should be site specific. Lee noted she felt similar with the last months Comprehensive Plan
Amendment for 7250 France Avenue.
Commissioner Nemerov moved to recommend that the City Council deny the request
for Preliminary Rezoning and Development Plan based on staff findings (page 20 of the
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 12 of 18
staff report). Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Ayes; Miranda, Nemerov,
Hamilton, Bennett, Olsen. Nays; Lee, Strauss Berube. Motion denied 5-3.
E. Preliminary Rezoning, Subdivision & Preliminary Plat for Pentagon Park South (4815
& 4901 77th Street West and 7710 Computer Avenue
Planner Presentation
Planner Teague reported that Solomon Real Estate Group is requesting a Rezoning from MDD-6 to
PUD-17 to develop the vacant 12.5 acre Pentagon South Parcel (4900 77th Street). The first phase
would include 11,800 square feet of retail space, a 193-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking
ramp. The second phase would be two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp and 19,000 square feet
of office/retail. A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved
for these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and no
Final Development Plan was approved.
The uses proposed here are generally consistent with the south portion of the draft overall
development plan for Pentagon South. Pentagon Park North will be reviewed as a separate future
development, as that plan is very different from the uses and development plan proposed in 2014
(office). Therefore, the applicant is proposing a revised PUD and Overall Development Plan to just
include the south parcel.
At full development build out, the project would include 225,000 square feet of office space, 2 hotels
(346 rooms), 30,800 square feet of retail and two parking structures with a total of 1,545 spaces.
As proposed, the development would require the following:
Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development, Overall Development Plan;
Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1; and
Subdivision.
Teague explained that the Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the
applicant. The applicant has responded.) The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area
Plan, Mic Johnson, AFO, has also reviewed the plans and provided feedback. The following
highlights some of the comments:
The plan has retained the central park feature from the draft PUD but at a much
reduced scale.
In place of larger buildings fronting W. 77th Street, the proposal suggests 2 retail pads
with parking and a mixed-use retail/office on the corner of W. 77th and Computer
Avenue. This would suggest a more typical suburban development approach, not
consistent with primary buildings facing W. 77th as delineated in the approved PUD.
Incorporating retail into office buildings could enliven these buildings during more times
of day, supporting the goal of a 24/7 community.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 13 of 18
Having retail, hotel and office surrounding all sides of the central park as outlined in the
PUD, along with a direct connection to Pentagon Park North, begins to create a
relationship between both sides of 77th. We would suggest moving all components of
the proposal closer together with greater density of activity closer to 77th.
On grade, parking should be considered as a placeholder for future development and
not as part of the overall plan in phase one.
The west office-building terrace at the 2nd level should face the park, which would
create a stronger semi-urban identity.
All building should create program space for street fronting buildings on secondary
streets around the whole development.
Teague asked the Commission to note that the applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process
before the Planning Commission and City Council. Based on feedback from the Planning Commission,
the City Council, the applicant has:
Eliminated the drive-through;
Reduced the amount of surface parking;
Increased setback on Viking Drive from 5 to 10 feet;
Increased the setback on Computer Drive from 10 feet to 18 & 20 feet; and
Combined the parking structures with buildings.
Planner Teague told the Commission that Staff would recommend that the City Council approve the
Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17, Planned Unit
Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, Subdivision, and Preliminary
Development Plan for Phase 1based on the following findings:
1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Conformance with the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area
Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included:
Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site.
Provide a “come to” and “stay at” development with mixed uses, retail, restaurant, public space
including seating areas, and a center plaza;
High quality buildings and design;
Provision of added shared public parking.
Public art; and
Economic vitality brought to Pentagon Park.
3. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan:
a. Movement Patterns.
▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods
along secondary streets or walkways.
▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale
lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.)
▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment.
b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure
and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 14 of 18
c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the
larger region
. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to
minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base.
e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between
neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure
and reduce dependence on the car.
f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale.
Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories
“step back” from street.
g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a
consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian
environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of
liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement.
i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots.
ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to
any entries oriented towards parking areas.
iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with
windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade.
iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings,
rather than between buildings and the street.
4. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary, the PUD zoning would:
a. Provides a mixed-use development by including retail, office, hotel and restaurants.
b. Creates a very pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of sidewalks
through and around the site.
c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless
an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council.
d. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with the draft Preliminary Plan, the
2007 Plan, and goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB Consulting conducted a
traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the
existing roads and proposed parking, subject to road improvements.
Approval is also subject to the following Conditions:
1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development
Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission.
2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the
Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for
one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or
erosion control measures at the time of any building permit.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 15 of 18
3. The exterior treatment on the parking garage facing the internal street must be matched on the
exterior of the parking garage that faces Bloomington.
4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City
Code.
5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code.
6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions
to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements.
7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval.
8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May
3, 2018.
9. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations including:
A. Addition of a northbound left turn lane, southbound striped left turn lane and eastbound right
turn lane at 77th Street and Commercial Access driveway.
B. Addition of a northbound dual left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and
Computer Avenue.
10. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th Street is
required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the applicant/landowner is
responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans would be subject to the
recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer.
11. All crosswalks shall be marked with “duraprint” type stamping, or whatever is the city standard at
the time of installation, to clearly identify the pedestrian crossings.
12. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile
parking space requirement.
13. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-17, Planned Unit Development
for this site.
Teague concluded that based on the findings outlined above, staff recommends approval of the
proposed Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17, Planned Unit
Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, Subdivision, and Preliminary
Development Plan for Phase 1, subject to the findings and conditions.
Appearing for the Applicant
Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate Group
Applicant Presentation
Scott addressed the Commission and reported he was very happy to be moving forward on this great
project. Scott explained that the south development plan would be built in phases with the first phase
consisting of two hotels, including the parking garage beneath the south hotel and the two small retail
buildings that would frame the front entry to the project. Continuing, Scott said Phase I would include
mass grading of the entire property and the installation of all utilities and storm water management
systems. Scott noted that the remainder of the property would be graded and seeded and maintained
until redevelopment.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 16 of 18
Scott stated the site would be developed as a mixed-use site intended to increase density and to
promote internal connectivity to buildings within the site as well as to connect uses and amenities of
the surrounding community.
Concluding, Scott said the master plan anticipates a variety of uses including multi-story offices, hotels,
retail, restaurants and parking structures to support all uses.
Commissioners asked Mr. Scott if their project was market tested and if clients want to locate in this
area. Scott responded in the affirmative.
Bill Wittrock, RSP addressed the Commission and with graphics highlighted aspects of the project.
He pointed out the following:
• The proposal maintains a development pattern consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan
and the plan approved in 2014.
• An efficient approach to land use was made to promote the health, safety, comfort, and
aesthetics of the City.
• The project provides sustainable design, new technologies in building design, special construction
materials, landscaping, lighting, storm water management and pedestrian oriented design.
• Pentagon Park South further provides for high quality of design that is aesthetically compatible
with the surrounding land uses;
• Improves the efficiency of public streets and utilities;
• Delivers a mix of land uses within the proposed development; and
• Established appropriate transitions between land uses.
• Safe connection to the “Fred”. The park is considered a large amenity.
• Bus line connections and intregated bus stops into the plan.
• 4-sided buildings.
Mr. Wittrock was asked if he received comments from the City Sustainable Coordinator. Wittrock
said comments were received and they would develop the site responsibility. Planner Teague added if
the Commission were to approve the project as presented, they could include the comments from the
Sustainable Coordinator as a condition of approval.
The applicant was asked what types of hotels would be built.
Steve Olson with Waterwalk told the Commission his company proposes to build an extended stay
hotel. The extended stay units would be from one to three bedrooms. The average length of stay
averages 77 nights. The hotel would be full service to include dog walkers. Olson said they operate a
similar facility in Plymouth. The other hotel is proposed as a dual brand hospitality hotel.
The applicant was asked if there would be public art throughout the site. Mr. Wittrock responded in
the affirmative. He explained a water feature is planned within the green area to include pathways.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 17 of 18
Public art would be introduced throughout the campus. Continuing, Wittrock said the entrance into
the site was designed to pull people inside.
Public Hearing
Chair Olsen opened the public hearing.
No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner
Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
Discussion/Comments/Questions
Commissioners expressed their support for the project indicating this is a step in the right direction
and is an excellent use of the PUD process. The applicants were further thanked for the attention
they paid to the comments from the Commission and Council at Sketch Plan.
Opinions were expressed that the project still feels too suburban; surface parking could be reduced
and buildings could be oriented closer to the street; however, it was pointed out not every
development needs to be downtown Minneapolis.
A discussion ensued on the project, its location and positive impact on the area situated off a highway.
Motion
Commissioner Hamilton moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning, Subdivision and
Development Plan approval for Pentagon South based on staff findings and subject to staff
conditions to include sustainability requirements. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the
motion. Ayes; Miranda, Lee, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube. Nay Olsen.
Motion carried 8-1.
VII. Community Comment
None.
Commissioner Hamilton moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss
seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried.
VI. Reports/Recommendations
None
VII. Correspondence And Petitions
Chair Olsen acknowledged back of packet materials.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date: Click here to enter a date.
Page 18 of 18
VIII. Chair And Member Comments
Commissioner Nemerov reported that he and Commissioner Hamilton were happy with the response
they received from residents and business owners who want to serve on the 50th and France Small Area
Plan Work Group.
Commissioner Miranda briefed the Commission on the Edina Senior Bus Service, Met Transit ABRT
Commissioner Lee noted that last week the Commission attended a Comprehensive Plan Boards and
Commission Workshop. Lee said at this time the Commission should consider their role in the Land Use
Chapter and how that chapter would evolve. Commissioner Lee further noted that the Commission
should add to their work plan for further study basements yes or no, and pervious and impervious
surfaces.
IX. Staff Comments
Commissioner Bennett asked Planner Teague if there would be a Comp Plan Work Session in two weeks.
Teague responded possibly, however, the topic has not been chosen.
X. Adjournment
Commissioner Hamilton moved to adjourn the May 9, 2018, Meeting of the Edina Planning
Commission at 12:05. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. All voted aye. The
motion carried.
Jackie HoogenakkerJackie HoogenakkerJackie HoogenakkerJackie Hoogenakker
Respectfully submitted
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-54
RESOLUTION DENYING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
REGARDING DENSITY IN THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND
PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM MDD-6, MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT-6 TO
PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 15, INCLUDING PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PENTAGON REVIVAL LLC
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. BACKGROUND.
1.01 Pentagon Revival LLC and Chase Real Estate are requesting an all housing redevelopment of
the Pentagon Park parcels located north of 77th Street. All parcels combined, the site is 28.91
acres in size.
1.02 The property is legally described as follows:
See attached Exhibit A.
1.03 A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for
these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and
no Final Development Plan was approved.
1.04 The use and overall development plan proposed for the north parcel (residential) is very
different than the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). At that time,
however, the Planning Commission and City Council both expressed a desire to develop this
site with some residential uses to create a mixed use development. Residential uses are
permitted under the current MDD-6 zoning designation. The approved preliminary plan
contemplated four stories adjacent to Fred Richards Park, and five stories on 77th Street. The
Comprehensive Plan allows up to 12 stories; while the current Zoning Ordinance maximum is
four stories.
1.05 At full development build out, the project would include 1,500 new housing units. The overall
density would be 52 units per acre.
1.06 The first phase of the project is proposed by Chase Real Estate Group to develop a 10.86
acre portion of the site (4600-4660 77th Street west), with a 360-unit market rate apartment
and a 225-unit senior apartment (585 total units).
1.07 As proposed the development would require the following:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density from 30 to 80 units per acre;
and
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-50
Page 2
Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development.
1.08 On May 9, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval
of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay.
1.09 On May 9, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended denial of
the Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 5 Ayes and 3 Nays.
1.10 On May 15, 2018, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request.
Section 2. DENIAL
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District-6
to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for 4820, 4510-
4660 77th Street West, and 7600 Parklawn Avenue subject to the following findings:
1. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is not appropriate at this time as the City
is currently considering the density in the transition area west of France as part of the
2018 Comprehensive Plan update.
2. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the 2008 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan.
3. The area west of France and south of the Fred Richard Park is considered a transition area
between the high density commercial development on the east side of France and South of
77th Street and the single family homes to the west and north. The proposed development
does not provide an adequate transition.
4. The density proposed is too high for this area.
5. This area will be studied closer as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update.
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-50
Page 3
ATTEST:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that
the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of June 19, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018.
_________________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-55
APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM MDD-6, MIXED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT TO PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 15, INCLUDING A
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PHASE 1 AND AN OVERALL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR CHASE REAL ESTATE AND PENTAGON REVIVAL LLC
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. BACKGROUND.
1.01 Pentagon Revival LLC and Chase Real Estate are requesting an all housing redevelopment of
the Pentagon Park parcels located north of 77th Street. All parcels combined, the site is 28.91
acres in size.
1.02 The property is legally described as follows:
See attached Exhibit A.
1.03 A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for
these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and
no Final Development Plan was approved.
1.04 The use and overall development plan proposed for the north parcel (residential) is very
different than the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). At that time,
however, the Planning Commission and City Council both expressed a desire to develop this
site with some residential uses to create a mixed use development. Residential uses are
permitted under the current MDD-6 zoning designation. The approved preliminary plan
contemplated four stories adjacent to Fred Richards Park, and five stories on 77th Street. The
Comprehensive Plan allows up to 12 stories; while the current Zoning Ordinance maximum is
four stories.
1.05 At full development build out, the project would include 1,500 new housing units. The overall
density would be 52 units per acre.
1.06 The first phase of the project is proposed by Chase Real Estate Group to develop a 10.86
acre portion of the site (4600-4660 77th Street west), with a 360-unit market rate apartment
and a 225-unit senior apartment (585 total units).
1.07 As proposed the development would require the following:
Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development;
Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1; and
An Overall Development Plan.
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-55
Page 2
1.08 On May 9, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended denial of
the Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 5 Ayes and 3 Nays.
1.10 On May 15, 2018, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request.
Section 2. FINDINGS
2.01 Approval is based on the following findings:
1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass.
3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the
site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council.
4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning
Framework Vision. The following principles are included:
Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site and
connect to the Regional Trail and Fred Richards Park to the north.
Provides the potential for additional public space along the north lot line in
conjunction with Fred Richards Park;
Opportunity to provide increased stormwater and ponding features in connection to
Fred Richards Park;
High quality building design; and
The potential for significant affordable housing in a future phase of development.
5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan:
a. Movement Patterns.
▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods
along secondary streets or walkways.
▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale
lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.)
▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern
discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship
between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement.
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-55
Page 3
b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure
and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character.
c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and
the larger region.
d. Increase mixed-use development overall in Pentagon Park where supported by
adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify
the tax base.
e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between
neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure
and reduce dependence on the car.
f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian
scale.
g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a
consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian
environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of
liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement.
h. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings,
rather than between buildings and the street.
6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic
and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be
supported by the existing roads and proposed parking, subject to conditions.
7. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would:
a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved
sidewalks and connections to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and Fred Richard
Park. The project would bring more vibrancy to the area.
b. The building would be of high quality brick architectural metal, stone, and glass.
c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless
an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council.
d. Project could significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock in the future.
e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the
Comprehensive Plan.
f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts.
8. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site.
Section 3. APPROVAL
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves
the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-15, Planned Unit
Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, and Preliminary Development Plan for
Phase 1.
Approval is subject to the following conditions:
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-55
Page 4
1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development
Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission.
2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of
the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted
for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening,
or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit.
3. Work with the City to expand the public space north of the parking area into the Fred Richards
Park including expansion of the dog park area, pedestrian connection and stormwater
retention.
4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City
Code.
5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code.
6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require
revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements.
7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval.
8. A letter of credit, cash escrow or bond in the amount of $5.46 million must be submitted to
the City prior to the issuance of a building permit to ensure that affordable housing occurs
within the development prior to issuance of a building permit. These monies would be given
back to the property owner upon delivering the affordable housing units within the
development that would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. If the property owner does
not deliver the affordable units within 3 years, the City would cash in the money to be used
elsewhere in the City to deliver affordable housing.
9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the sustainability coordinator’s memo dated
May 2, 2018.
10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May
3, 2018.
11. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th Street is
required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the applicant/landowner is
responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans would be subject to the
recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer.
12. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations.
13. All crosswalks shall be marked with ground-in premark preformed thermoplastic in a standard
or “continental” pattern per Edina Standard Plate No. 716 to clearly identify the pedestrian
crossings.
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-55
Page 5
14. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development
for this site.
15. Dedication of public access easements along the entrance to Fred Richards Park and the drive
aisle and parking stalls along the north lot line subject to review and approval of the city
attorney. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the Park.
16. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density.
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-55
Page 6
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 19, 2018.
ATTEST:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that
the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of June 19, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018.
_________________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-54
RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
REGARDING DENSITY IN THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
Section 1. BACKGROUND.
1.01 Pentagon Revival LLC and Chase Real Estate are requesting an all housing redevelopment of
the Pentagon Park parcels located north of 77th Street. All parcels combined, the site is 28.91
acres in size.
1.02 The property is legally described as follows:
See attached Exhibit A.
1.03 A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for
these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and
no Final Development Plan was approved.
1.04 The use and overall development plan proposed for the north parcel (residential) is very
different than the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). At that time,
however, the Planning Commission and City Council both expressed a desire to develop this
site with some residential uses to create a mixed use development. Residential uses are
permitted under the current MDD-6 zoning designation. The approved preliminary plan
contemplated four stories adjacent to Fred Richards Park, and five stories on 77th Street. The
Comprehensive Plan allows up to 12 stories; while the current Zoning Ordinance maximum is
four stories.
1.05 At full development build out, the project would include 1,500 new housing units. The overall
density would be 52 units per acre.
1.06 The first phase of the project is proposed by Chase Real Estate Group to develop a 10.86
acre portion of the site (4600-4660 77th Street west), with a 365-unit market rate apartment
and a 225-unit senior apartment (590 total units).
1.07 As proposed the development would require the following:
A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density from 30 to 55 units per acre;
and
Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development.
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-54
Page 2
1.08 On May 9, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval
of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay.
1.09 On May 9, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended denial of
the Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 5 Ayes and 3 Nays.
1.10 On May 15, 2018, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request.
Section 2. APPROVAL
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the
Comprehensive Plan amendment as written below, subject to Metropolitan Council approval:
Table 4.3. Future Land Use Categories is amended as follows:
Approval is based on the following findings:
1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is
generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494,
and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial
roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this
area.
2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area
Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is
contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per
acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-
80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater
densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52
units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior
housing) is 80 units per acre.
OR
Office-Residential
No current examples in
City. Potential examples
include Pentagon Park
area and other I-494
corridor locations
Transitional areas along major
thoroughfares or between higher-
intensity districts and residential
districts. Many existing highway-
oriented commercial areas are
anticipated to transition to this
more mixed-use character.
Primary uses are offices, attached
or multifamily housing.
Secondary uses: Limited retail and
service uses (not including “big
box” retail), limited industrial
(fully enclosed), institutional uses,
parks and open space. Vertical
mixed use should be encouraged,
and may be required on larger
sites.
Upgrade existing streetscape
and building appearance,
improve pedestrian and
transit environment.
Encourage structured
parking and open space
linkages where feasible;
emphasize the enhancement
of the pedestrian
environment.
12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The
properties at 4820, 4510-4660 77th Street West, and
7600 Parklawn Avenue or legally described in attached
Exhibit A, may have a density up to 55 units per acre
through a PUD rezoning.
Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code
Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by
case basis, subject to proximity to utilities
capacity, level of transit service available, and
impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to
allow greater density or density on the high end of
the residential housing range above, would
include: Below grade parking, provision of park or
open space, affordable housing, sustainable design
principles, provision of public art, pedestrian
circulation, and podium height.
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-54
Page 3
3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding
communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis
Park.
4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable
housing units.
5. Traffic studies done by WSB conclude that densities contemplated on the west side of
France to Pentagon Park can be supported by the existing roadway system.
ATTEST:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that
the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of June 19, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018.
_________________________________
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION
ORDINANCE NO. 2018-09
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-15 ZONING
DISTRICT
The City Of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following:
Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-15 (PUD-15) Pentagon Park North
(a) Legal description:
See attached Exhibit A
(b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans,
including the master development plan for the site received by the City on
_________, 2018 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2018-___ on
file in the Office of the Planning Department.
(c) Principal Uses:
All uses allowed in the MDD-6 Zoning District.
Multi-family Apartments/Condos.
Senior Housing
Assisted Living including care suites and rehabilitation
Memory Care
4820 77th Street West shall be re-developed with affordable housing only.
(d) Accessory Uses:
All accessory uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District.
(e) Conditional Uses:
All conditional uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District.
(f) Development Standards.
Required
Setbacks - Buildings
77th Street (Front Street)
North (Rear-Park)
West
Parklawn Ave. (Front Street)
30 feet
100 feet
100 Feet
30 feet
Building Height 5 stories and 60 feet
2
(g) Signs shall be regulated per the Mixed Development District.
Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the
Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on:
Send two affidavits of publication.
Bill to Edina City Clerk
Parking lot and drive aisle
setback
Street
Side & Park
20 feet
10 feet
Building Coverage 22%
Maximum Floor Area Ratio
(FAR)
1.5 FAR
Parking Stalls Phase 1
Other uses determined by the
Use in Sec. 36-1311
423 enclosed proposed
130 surface proposed
194 enclosed
59 surface
The CITY of
EDINA
Pentagon Park (North) –Comp. Plan
Amendment, Rezoning including an Overall
Development Plan, Preliminary Plat and
Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 2
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 3
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 4
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 5
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 6
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 7
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 8
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 9
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 10
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 11
Sketch Plan
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 12
Sketch Plan
The CITY of
EDINARevisions from Sketch Plan:
EdinaMN.gov 13
➢Removed two surface lots, including one on 77th Street;
➢Decreased private parking from 310 to 207 surface stalls;
➢Increased the shared Park Parking from 40 to 93 stalls;
➢Increased the underground parking from 442 to 558 stalls;
➢Increase courtyard size, opened up more landscape view, broke up the mass of the buildings;
➢Market-rate plaza entry and corner off West 77th and lobby + common spaces to spill out on
for more glass store-front architecture and active corner;
➢Increased green space along 77th and brought the buildings closer to 77th;
➢Added a 3rd public connection to the Park and Nine Mile Creek Trail along the west lot line
➢Added a community dog park;
The CITY of
EDINARevisions from Sketch Plan:
EdinaMN.gov 14
➢Added a community garden, park benches and public artwork;
➢Improved the architecture with 5th floor setbacks and terraces. Variations in balcony setback
and styles. Added a 5th floor club room and outdoor terrace over-looking the park. More
contemporary design with glass corners;
➢Dedicated land for the Park, including a new driveway connection to the Park including
landscaped boulevards, area monument sign, in/out drive lines, parallel parking, 10 foot bike
pedestrian trail and perimeter boulevards; and
➢Chase will be building the Park Access road and dedicate the right-of-way to the City in the
Phase 1 improvements.
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 15
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 16
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 17
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 18
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 19
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 20
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 21
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 22
The CITY of
EDINARequest Requires:
➢A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density from 30 to 55 units
per acre; and
➢Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development.
www.EdinaMN.gov 23
The CITY of
EDINAReview of the Site Plan
EdinaMN.gov 24
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 25
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 26
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 27
City Standard (MDD-
6)
Proposed
(Rough Estimates)
Setbacks -
Buildings
Front Setback
35 feet + ½ foot for each
foot the building height
exceeds minimum setback
60 feet Required
32 & 35 feet (77th Street)*
114 feet (Fred Richards Park)
100 Feet (west side)
Building Height 4 stories and 48 feet 5 stories and 60 feet*
Parking lot and drive
aisle setback
20 feet (street)
10 feet (park)
5 feet (side)
20 feet
10-30 feet (Fred
Richards Park)
20 feet
Building Coverage 30%22%
Maximum Floor
Area Ratio (FAR)
50% -Non-residential
Uses
50% -Residential Uses
473,061 SF Total
540,000 s.f. all
residential*
(Compliant if the
Pentagon Park South
Parcel is included)
Parking Stalls –All
Age
Senior
1.25 enclosed per unit
(450)
.75 surface per unit
(270)
.25 enclosed per unit
(112)
.50 surface per unit
(56)
423 enclosed
proposed*
130 surface
proposed*
194 enclosed
59 surface
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 28
The CITY of
EDINAPrimary Issues
➢Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density
reasonable?
➢Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site?
EdinaMN.gov 29
The CITY of
EDINAComprehensive Plan Amendment
-Density
➢Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on
France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th street which connects France
Avenue to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the
AUAR densities contemplated for this area.
➢The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80 -90
units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue
and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and
lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater
densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On
the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre.
EdinaMN.gov 30
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 31
The CITY of
EDINAComprehensive Plan Amendment
-Density
➢Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities
including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park.
➢Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units .
➢Traffic studies done by WSB conclude that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be
supported by the existing roadway system.
EdinaMN.gov 32
The CITY of
EDINA➢PUD Justification
EdinaMN.gov 33
➢The proposal does not adequately address the guiding principles established with the 2014
Preliminary Rezoning for this site. The principles include providing: Green Streets, Integrated
Stormwater, Multimodal Connections and shared parking. The streets are not necessarily
“green;” the parkway shown on the approved preliminary plan is a traditional two -way
driveway with parking on both sides.
One the conditions of Preliminary Rezoning for this site in 2014 was as follows:
“A majority of the storm water retention shall be developed as an amenity and integrated into the
overall development.”
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 34
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 35
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 36
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 37
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 38
The CITY of
EDINAPUD Justification
➢The previously approved Overall Development for this site in 2014
better addressed the Development Principles and divided the site
into 18 blocks; the proposal divides the site into 7 blocks.
www.EdinaMN.gov 39
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 40
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 41
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 42
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 43
The CITY of
EDINAPUD Justification
➢On its own, this project is entirely residential and not mixed use.
➢Lack of affordable housing within the project. While the proposal is to construct100 units of
affordable housing within the overall development, staff is concerned that there are no
guarantees for this future development.
www.EdinaMN.gov 44
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 45
The CITY of
EDINARecommendation
EdinaMN.gov 46
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 47
The CITY of
EDINARecommendation
EdinaMN.gov 48
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 49
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 50
The CITY of
EDINA
EdinaMN.gov 51
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 52
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 53
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 54
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 55
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 56
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 57
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 58
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 59
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 60
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 61
The CITY of
EDINAQuestions?
www.EdinaMN.gov 62
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 63
The CITY of
EDINA
www.EdinaMN.gov 64
City Council
SIENNA ON THE PARK
PENTAGON NORTH REDEVELOPMENT
June 19, 2018
DAMON FARBER ASSOC IATES
BOB CLOSE STUDIO ,LLC AREA CONTEXT
EDINA.MN APRIL 21,2014 PENTAGON PAR K
135 Acres Gateway AUAR Study Area
43 Acres Fred R. Park
178 Acres in the City of Edina Ripe for Transformation
43 Acres Fred R. Park
MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
THE LINK -EDINA
Sienna on the Park
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Redevelopment
• 11+ Acres of work including public improvements
• 1000’ of West 77th street frontage
• Demolition West to East - 4 buildings
• One phase
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Project Goals:
1) Transform an underutilized, blighted 60’s era office park.
2) Redevelop a new community - bring diversity of residential
offerings to all ages and needs - and kickstart future growth.
-Pedestrian scaled - transition from office, industrial
-Urban living, nature connected
3) Partner with the City in providing public improvements
and activate the Fred Richards Park.
4) Meet guiding principals of the Redevelopment plan.
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Transformation
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Transformation
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
‘Good to Great’
- Blight to Great -
• Demolition of vacant office buildings and 1000 surface parking stalls
• 300 total site stalls - incl. nearly 100 shared stalls for public park
• 70% reduction in surface parking area (290k sf reduced to 137k sf)
• No parking lots facing 77th Street
• 550 underground stalls = 175,000 SF garage
• 90,000+ SF of new green space
• 190,000 SF future tree canopy (40%)
• 1,000 linear feet of 77th Street revitalized and 500’ road access to park
• 5,000+ feet of new sidewalk and trails
• Public art, enhanced street lighting, boulevards, way finding,
monument signs, elec car charging stations, bus stop
• Investment and funding source to kickstart the Fred’s park
improvement plans
• Fred Richards Park public access road, boulevard + 10’ walk & bike trail
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
‘Good to Great’
- Blight to Great -
• Enhanced water features, berms and landscaping along park
• Community Dog Park, community garden, picnic areas, outdoor games
• 4 Trail connections to Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail
• 575 new apartment homes and senior suites community.
• Jumpstarting a new neighborhood from vacant office/industrial setting
into a new community; one that begins with a variety of residents in
ages, needs and services.
• 100 affordable homes being delivered with Dominium partner.
• Bring further investment into remaining phases.
• Influx of future residents will support the complimentary mixed-use
projects of Pentagon South and surrounding neighborhood businesses
• Project value and tax increases of 25x and 10x.
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
THE LINK - FRED RICHARDS PARK REDEVELOPMENT
Urban Location
-Nature Connected
Support surrounding
business - generate future
neighboring investment
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Total Development Cost
$141M
Opening Fall 2020 thru Spring 2021
+ approx. 100 affordable apartment homes
with partner Dominium at 4820 property
225 Senior Care Suites
-135 Independent
-46 Assisted
-32 Memory Care
-12 Rehab Care Suites
365 Market-Rate
-Range from 500-1500 SF
-Studios to 2Bed+Dens
Avg: 1bd+Den 900 SF
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Value Created:
10x
Tax Increase
Current: $200,000Proposed: $2,000,000
27X
Property Value Increase
Current: $5.8MProposed: $160M
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
CHASE REAL ESTATE - THE LINK
Edina, MN
12
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
9
98
8
10
10
1
SITE PLAN
SHARED PAR
K
I
N
G
SHARED PARKINGSHARED PAR
K
I
N
G
BUS STOP
PLAZA SENIOR
PLAZA
PUBLIC
TRAIL
GARDEN DOG
PARK
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Connection + views to outdoors
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Urban + Nature
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
W 7 7 t h S t
H
w
y
1
0
0
N
i
n
e
-
M
i
l
e
C
r
e
e
k
Park
l
a
w
n
A
v
e
W 76th
S
t
Franc
e
A
v
e
S
260+ stalls 100 + stalls 8 stalls
1
2
3
1 2 3
INVITE THE WHOLE COMMUNITY
shift the center of gravity
*
*
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
INVITE THE WHOLE COMMUNITY
-All ages
-various uses
-enjoyment for all
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Create Pathways for Play + HealthRestore Nature’s RoleEcosystem services are a critical part of the city’s infrastructure that will be re-stored.Invite the Whole CommunityProviding year-round access, activities, and spaces for all of edina’s residents to build community and pride. Major nature bank the Great Lawnthe loop neighborhood park
central
green
PARK MASTER PLAN
Ready to get started
Blur the property line
Sienna on the Park - Pentagon North Redevelopment
Edina, MN | City Council - June 19, 2018
Tr
a
n
s
i
Ɵ
o
n
a
l
s
i
t
e
t
h
a
t
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
s
t
w
o
d
i
s
Ɵ
n
c
t
l
y
d
i
f
f
e
r
e
n
t
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
s
.
E
a
s
t
a
n
d
We
s
t
.
F
a
s
t
p
a
c
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
,
s
o
Ō
e
d
g
e
o
n
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
1. vic park?
we have always looked at plan from 20,000 feet, not
focusing on the paths and trails
THE LINK - EDINA 04.09.2018
THE FRED
EXISTING
PARKING
W 77TH STREET
MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
PA
R
K
L
A
W
N
A
V
E
NORTH075’ 150’ 300’
1
11
Pedestrian Friendly 77th
connect west to east
Integrated Stormwater
Green Corridor
Multimodal Transportation
Potential Shared
Parking
Pedestrian Campus
Connections
Pedestrian Access to The
Fred Pavilion & Park
Vehicular Access to The Fred
Pavilion & Park
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
THE LINK - EDINA 04.09.2018
THE FRED
EXISTING
PARKING
W 77TH STREET
MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
PA
R
K
L
A
W
N
A
V
E
NORTH075’ 150’ 300’
8
Pedestrian Friendly 77th
connect west to east
Integrated Stormwater
Green Corridor
Multimodal Transportation
Potential Shared
Parking
Pedestrian Campus
Connections
Pedestrian Access to The
Fred Pavilion & Park
Vehicular Access to The Fred
Pavilion & Park
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
THE LINK - EDINA 04.09.2018
THE FRED
EXISTING
PARKING
W 77TH STREET
MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
PA
R
K
L
A
W
N
A
V
E
NORTH075’ 150’ 300’
7
7
7
777
Pedestrian Friendly 77th
connect west to east
Integrated Stormwater
Green Corridor
Multimodal Transportation
Potential Shared
Parking
Pedestrian Campus
Connections
Pedestrian Access to The
Fred Pavilion & Park
Vehicular Access to The Fred
Pavilion & Park
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
7
7
THE LINK - EDINA 04.09.2018
THE FRED EXISTING
PARKING
W 77TH STREET
MASTER PLAN CONCEPT
PA
R
K
L
A
W
N
A
V
E
NORTH075’ 150’ 300’
6
6
3
6
Pedestrian Friendly 77th
connect west to east
Integrated Stormwater
Green Corridor
Multimodal Transportation
Potential Shared
Parking
Pedestrian Campus
Connections
Pedestrian Access to The
Fred Pavilion & Park
Vehicular Access to The Fred
Pavilion & Park
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
6
6
Edina Inspiration
Edina Inspiration
Edina Inspiration
Edina Inspiration
Pers of entry
Edina for a Lifetime
HEALTHY HOUSING
• Downsizing opportunity for Changing Familes in Edina
• Home for young adults returning
HEALTHY ECONOMY
• Housing and destination amenities support local economies
• Our typical residents spend and shop locally
HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT
• Improved Sidewalks and trails that connect to parks and transit
• Improved Stormwater Quality
• Improved Landscape
• Architecture that supports growth and connectivity along 77th
Grow Up---Raise a Family---Retire
Edina for a Lifetime
Grow Up---Raise a Family---Retire
• Zillow Nationwide Survey - 64% of Renters buy in the same city
• Millenials purchase expensive homes. Nat’l. Avg = $217,000 per home.
• National Multihousing Council Survey - Renters spend locally $421.5 billion per year.
• This will be a location where citizens of Edina will move to, freeing up current housing stock.
• City sees immediate benefit of trails, storm water quality, open space, landscape.
Edina for a Lifetime
1. What we are asking for tonight is consistant with your published vision of Edina
2. It is consistant with what we have conveyed in neighborhood meetings and received well
3. We want to partner with you as a city and share parking for the park access to the park and
help with stormwater in the park.
a. this plan connects 77th to emerging areas of the city, and gives space to move along the park.
b. Could there be more space along the park? sure, but density brings quality, quality of
materials, and roof tops that support local businesses
c. demonstrated tonight we are more connected to trails, landscape and amenities than meets
the eye
1. Grow Up---Raise a Family---Retire
Stand for Questions
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director
Item Activity:
Subject:S ketch P lan R eview: 4532 F rance Avenue Disc ussion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
No action requested.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
P rovide the applicant non-binding comments on a potential future re-development proposal at 4532 France
Avenue.
T he applicant would tear down the existing single family home that is currently occupied as an office and build a
new two-story, 10,000 square-foot retail/office building. T he building would include roof terrace with outdoor
seating for employees. T here would be eight parking spaces provided in front of the building to resemble the
recently constructed bank and retail space to the north.
T he proposal is significantly short parked as fifty spaces would be required.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Planning Commission Review Memo
Site Location & 44th & France Small Area Plan
Proposed Plans
Additional rendering of the back
Sketch Plan Presentation
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
City Hall • Phone 952-927-8861
Fax 952-826-0389 • www.CityofEdina.com
Date: May 23, 2018
To:
Planning Commission
From: Cary Teague, Community Development Director
Re:
Sketch Plan Review – 4532 France Avenue
The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan request to redevelop the site at 4532
France Avenue. The applicant would tear down the existing single family home that is currently
occupied as an office and build a new two-story, 10,000 square-foot retail/office building. The
building would include roof terrace with outdoor seating for employees. There would be eight
parking spaces provided in front of the building to resemble the recently constructed bank and
retail space to the north. The proposal is significantly short parked as fifty spaces would be
required. The site slopes down to the rear of the property, so the elevations on the west side
would appear to be three stories to the residential uses to the west.
The property is .21 acres (8,971 s.f.) in size. This site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as NN,
Neighborhood Node, which has a height limit of 2-4 stories. (See portions of the Plan attached,
including the guiding principles.) The applicant has responded to the guiding principles within their
narrative. The proposed development plans assume district parking, which is recommended in the
Comprehensive Plan; however, there is no district parking available at this time. The City Council
will begin to consider the idea through the City’s Capital Improvement Plan and their Work Plan
in 2018-19.
The site is currently zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, but is used as office space. The existing
use is nonconforming within the single-family home. Assessing records of the City indicate it has
been an office use since the mid 1970’s. The home was built in 1924. There are no planning
records that indicate the change in use.
The request would require the following:
1. A Rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District.
2. The following Variances would be required (See compliance table on the following page):
Side & Rear Yard Setback (building)
Building height
Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Parking stalls
Side & Front Yard Setback (parking lot)
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Below is a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the
proposed PCD-1 Standards on the lot. Please note that several variances would be required under
the existing zoning standards, most notably the parking requirements.
Compliance Table
City Standard
(PCD-1)
Proposed
Lot line Street
Building Setbacks
Front – France Avenue
Rear
Side – North
Side – South
Parking Lot Setbacks
Front – France Avenue
Side – North
Side – South
35 feet
25 feet
NA
25 feet
20 feet
5 feet
5 feet
48 feet 62 feet
13 feet*
NA
14 feet*
4 feet* 18 feet
0 feet*
0 feet*
Building Height 2-stories & 24 feet
2 stories & 30 feet*
38 feet to the top of the
elevator/stair/storage area
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 1.1*
Parking 10,000 s.f.
1 space/200 s.f.
50 spaces required
8 spaces*
*Variances required
Highlights/Issues:
The proposed site plan is designed to resemble the site plan layout of the adjacent property to
the north.
Height matches adjacent single-family home height maximum.
There is very little landscaping, public realm or public space proposed.
City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424
Traffic and parking impact study would be required. Staff has significant concern over the lack of
parking proposed, without a specific plan in place for district parking. A contribution to future
cost of public parking would be essential if this project were to move forward. The applicant is
suggesting opening up parking on France on the West side. Even if that were to happen, there
would not be adequate nearby parking to the site.
Sustainability. The applicant has responded to the city’s Sustainability Questionnaire within their
submitted plans.
The building materials on the elevator and stair on the roof should match rest of the building.
The site slopes down to the rear of the property, so the elevations on the west side would
appear to be three stories to the residential uses to the west.
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018
Landmark Building Sketch Plan Submission
4532 France Avenue South
Edina, Minnesota
Submitted on:
May 4,2018
Submitted to:
City of Edina
Community Development Department
Planning Division
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Team
Project Description
Page 3
Pages 4
Contents (“Attachment X” references original submittal)
Additional information provided for discussion is shown in italics
Existing Survey
Vicinity Map
Approved Small Area Plan Concept
Buildable Area vs. Parking Requirement Illustrations
Architectural Plans
Architectural Exterior Renderings
Sustainable Development Questionnaire
France Avenue Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Attachment D
Attachment E
Attachment F
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 3
PROJECT TEAM
Owner: Landmark Build Co.
2116 2nd Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55404
612.817.5483
Architect: PLAAD, LLC
Matthew Byers, AIA
P.O. Box 184
Stillwater, MN 55082
651.336.1393
matt@plaadoffice.com
Civil Engineering: Solution Blue, Inc.
444 Cedar Street, Suite 1005
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
651.294.0038
mcookas@solutionblue.com
Landscape Architect: Solution Blue, Inc.
444 Cedar Street, Suite 1005
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
651.294.0038
mcookas@solutionblue.com
Builder Landmark Build Co.
2116 2nd Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55404
612.817.5483
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
May 4, 2018
Dear City of Edina Planning Division,
Thank you for the opportunity to submit a sketch plan for a proposed development at 4532 France Avenue South
in Edina, Minnesota.
In the following pages you will find what we believe to be a thoughtfully articulated, appropriately scaled and
aesthetically compelling addition to the 44th & France Neighborhood.
The property currently houses a single-family residential structure being used for various small businesses. This
new proposal provides for over 10,000 sf of new retail and business space and includes a rooftop deck for use by
the businesses residing in the building.
The property is targeted for redevelopment and rezoning in the new small area plan for the neighborhood, and,
after a series of design iterations over the past six months while the small area plan was being developed, we feel
that the proposed design effectively balances the need for a financially feasible development while addressing
many of the goals of the small area plan guiding principles.
We sincerely thank you for your time and consideration, and look forward to answering any additional questions
that you may have. You may reach me directly at 651.336.1393 or matt@plaadoffice.com.
Sincerely,
Matthew M. Byers, AIA, LEED AP BD+C
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 5
ATTACHMENT A Existing Survey
Fr
a
n
c
e
A
v
e
n
u
e
EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That portion of Block 20, Waveland Park, an Addition to Minneapolis, bounded by a line described as follows:
Beginning at a point of beginning on the West boundary line of France Avenue, which point is approximately 30
feet West of the East line of Section 7, Township 28, Range 24, and 200 feet North of the South line of said Section
7, Township 28, Range 24;running thence North along the West boundary line of France Avenue a distance of 60
feet; thence at right angles West a distance of 150 feet; thence at right angles South a distance of 60 feet to a point
which is directly West of and 150 feet feet distant from the point of beginning; thence East to the point of
beginning.
PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO FIX GAPS AND OVERLAPS:
That portion of Block 20, Waveland Park, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block
1, Mark Nelson First Addition; thence westerly along the North line of said Lot 1 a distance of 150.00 feet to a line
that is 150 feet West of the West line of France Avenue; thence northerly and parallel with the West line of said
France Avenue a distance of 60 feet to a line that is parallel with and 260 feet North of the South line of Section 7,
Township 28, Range 24; thence easterly parallel with the South line of said Section 7 a distance of 150 feet more or
less to the West line of said France Avenue; thence southerly along the West line of said France Avenue a distance
of 60.00 feet to the point of beginning.
SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:
1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above.The scope of our
services does not include determining what you own,which is a legal matter.Please check the legal
description with your records or consult with competent legal counsel,if necessary,to make sure that it is
correct and that any matters of record,such as easements,that you wish to be included on the survey have
been shown.
2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey.
3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property.
4.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of such
governmental agencies that may have jurisdiction over these requirements to verify they are correctly shown
before proceeding with construction.
5.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site.We
have also provided a benchmark for your use in determining elevations for construction on this site.The
elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on this survey.Use that benchmark and check at least
one other feature shown on the survey when determining other elevations for use on this site or before
beginning construction.
6.We notice that the existing legal description creates gaps and overlaps with the North and South properties.As
per our conversation with the title company involved,we have written a proposed description to close those
gaps and overlaps. The boundary line shown on the survey reflects the proposed legal description.
7.Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines,are taken from the siding
and or stucco of the building.
STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS:
"●" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted.
# 42379
LICENSE NO.
Thomas M. Bloom
DATE
S1AUGUST 17, 2017
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345
Phone (952) 474-7964
17917 Highway 7
Web: www.advsur.com SHEET 1 OF 1
40200
AUGUST 8, 2017
AUGUST 17, 2017
EXISTING HARDCOVER
House 1,016 Sq. Ft.
Bituminous 5,786 Sq. Ft.
Concrete Surfaces 428 Sq. Ft.
Ret. Walls 37 Sq. Ft.
Wood Steps 15 Sq. Ft.
TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 7,282 Sq. Ft.
AREA OF LOT 9,001 Sq. Ft.
PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 80.9%
LEGEND
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 6
ATTACHMENT B Vicinity Map
Neighborhood map, with subject property highlighted in green.
Existing parking at neighboring building
Existing parking at neighboring building
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 7
Approved Small Area Plan Concept
ILLUSTRATED SITE BOUNDARY
IN SAP
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 8
Approved Small Area Plan Concept
ACTUAL SITE BOUNDARY
NEIGHBORING SITE
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 9
Buildable Area vs. Parking Requirement Illustration
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 10
Buildable Area vs. Parking Requirement Illustration
Scale of typical car
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 11
Buildable Area vs. Parking Requirement Illustration
50 Parking Spots at Southdale Target
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 12
Buildable Area vs. Parking Requirement Illustration
50 Parking Spots at Southdale Target
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 13
Buildable Area vs. Parking Requirement Illustration
50 parking spots
requires 144’ width and 120’ depth
50 parking spots
requires 60’ width and 214’ depth
4532 France Avenue (site)
60’ width and 150’ depth
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 14
Buildable Area vs. Parking Requirement Illustration
4532 France Avenue (site)
double-loaded parking not possible with required parking setbacks
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 15
Buildable Area vs. Parking Requirement Illustration
Completely parked site
4532 France Avenue (site)
completely parked on grade
34 stalls possible
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 16
ATTACHMENT C Architectural Plans
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 17
ATTACHMENT C Architectural Plans
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 18
ATTACHMENT C Architectural Plans
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 19
ATTACHMENT C Architectural Plans
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 20
ATTACHMENT D Architectural Exterior Rendering
Street view from France Avenue, looking southwest
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 21
ATTACHMENT D Architectural Exterior Rendering
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 22
PREVIOUS STUDIES
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 23
PREVIOUS STUDY - REAR PARKING WITH TWO-SIDED PARKING ACCESS
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 24
PREVIOUS STUDY - REAR PARKING WITH TWO-SIDED PARKING ACCESS
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 25
PREVIOUS STUDY - REAR PARKING WITH TWO-SIDED PARKING ACCESS
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 26
COVERED ENTRY WALK
OUTDOOR DISPLAY AREA
NORTH
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
K
(
F
R
A
N
C
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
I
D
E
)
PREVIOUS STUDY - UNDERGROUND PARKING WITH SOUTH SIDE PARKING ACCESS
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 27
ATTACHMENT E Sustainable Development Questionnaire
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Sustainable Design & Energy
Have you utilized Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development?
As we are in the early stages of schematic design, we have not yet engaged Xcel Energy or Centerpoint Energy.
However, the developer fully intends to utilize these programs during the development of the project.
Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals and/or will they be Energy Star certified? If not, please share the steps you are taking to support energy conservation.
While the developer is not intending to meet the standards required for compliance with SB2030, they will seek
Energy Star certification.
Will you be optimizing the roof by installing a green roof?
The developer has expressed interest in developing a small portion of the roof as an extensive green roof. A
larger section of the roof that was initially conceived of as a green roof is instead being investigated as a location
for photovoltaic panels.
Will there be any renewable energy generation on site?
The developer is performing a life-cycle assessment on the costs of installing photovoltaic panels over
approximately one-third of the roof.
Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)?
The developer is currently investigating the feasibility of this strategy.
What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment?What is the percent post development?
Based upon the survey dated August 17, 2017, performed by Advance Survey & Engineering, the total existing
impervious hardcover is 7,282 sf. With a lot size of 9,001 sf, this represents a pervious cover percentage of 19%
and an impervious cover percentage of 81%.
With a combination of intensive green roof strategies and ground-level landscaping, we are proposing no
increase/decrease in impervious cover.
What new services will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking)
Currently, the design team is researching pervious pavers at the rear patio and walkways.
How will the landscaping support the natural ecosystem? (i.e. Rain gardens, % native plants, % bee friendly pollinator plants)
Although not developed with our landscape architect yet, we will be investigating native plantings and bee-friendly
pollinator plants. Furthermore, we will be working to divert roof drain runoff into above-ground cisterns to collect
rainwater for use as landscape irrigation water.
What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment?What is the percent post development?
Currently, due to a substantial amount of borrowed canopy coverage from the neighboring properties, the site
has about 30% canopy coverage. A large tree just over the property line to the south currently contributes to
the canopy coverage. Given that the proposed redevelopment is only two stories tall, and the new proposed
development is pulled back off of the southern property line, this canopy will remain. There will be a few trees that
will need to be removed at the north property line, but we propose to replace those with new trees in the side yard
setbacks at the south and west sides of the property. We will attempt, as much as possible, to match the existing
canopy cover.
Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)?
Yes. The new trees shown in the south and west side yard setbacks will be at least 4-5 inches in diameter.
Will a recycling service be provided to all businesses on site?
Yes
Will an organic (i.e. food waste) recycling service be provided to all businesses on site?
To the extent that it is necessary with incidental food waste for the office uses on site, we will investigate the
options available to us.
Will there be bike parking near main entrance for guests?
Yes. Additionally, we are proposing a shower and changing room in the lower level to encourage non-vehicular
transportation and commuting for employees on site.
Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners or guests to use?
Yes, one space will be reserved.
Will there be parking spaces provided for car-sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars?
Due to the limited parking available on site, no.
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 28
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 29
FRANCE AVENUE AREA WORKING PRINCIPLES AND SUPPORTING QUESTIONS
Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district
principles.
How does the proposal contribute to the realization of the principles for the district?
The proposed redevelopment provides a thoughtfully articulated two-story mixed-use commercial building
that aesthetically enhances and unifies the overall district image using traditional building materials, and
programmatically provides desired retail and business space.
How can the proposal move beyond the principles for the district?
What tangible and intangible outcomes might be offered by the proposal but cannot be achieved by the project on its own?
We believe that the City wants the site redeveloped, as evidenced by its inclusion in the small area plan. With
the current residential structure on the site, the site is not being put to its best potential use. The site, however,
is narrow compared to its neighbors in the district. Due to the 60’ width and two-way drive aisle minimums, a
maximum of 32 parking spaces would be possible if the entire ground level was developed as a parking lot. This
is neither practical from a development standpoint, nor desirable from a public experience concern. In order to
develop a project that is financially feasible and one which we feel will beneficially augment the character of the
district, we are proposing providing eight parking spots at the front of the building. This is not enough to support
all of the full-time employees expected on the site. Therefore, district parking, or agreements with neighboring
developers will be required to provide the parking necessary for some of the employees. In a current political and
cultural environment that is actively pushing for alternative methods of multi-modal transportation, providing fewer
parking spaces will encourage the use of alternative mass-transit options.
What does the proposal offer as a way of balancing those outcomes provided by others?
The first floor of the proposed development will primarily house an established and proven retail business
focused on home furnishings, along with real estate offices. The pedestrian traffic encouraged by both of these
businesses will add to the economic vitality of the district.
What alternatives were explored to arrive at a proposal that is best aligned with the principles and the opportunities of the district?
This proposal represents the fourth iteration of the design. The development team was initially interested in
achieving four floors of development on the site with underground parking. With the progression of the small area
plan over the course of the last few months, and recognizing the investment required to achieve only 10 parking
spaces underground (after clearances, aisle widths and turning radii were calculated), the development team
considered a structure with parking at grade at the rear of the site and a building with a mixed height profile: three
stories at France Avenue and two stories at the rear of the site. In this scheme, with parking at the rear of the
site, vehicular access was needed on both sides of the building to facilitate logical parking access and prevent
dead-end parking. While this was beneficial from a site circulation viewpoint, it limited the amount of impervious
surface we would have been able to provide. Finally, better understanding the desires of the City with the small
area plan that was adopted, the development team re-envisioned the project as a two-story project with a walk-out
lower level and roof deck. To reduce the impervious surface required to access parking in the rear of the site, and
to provide better visual access to the retail environment, the parking was pulled to the front of the building. This
allowed the design team to eliminate the two vehicular access aisles on either side of the building.
Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly
accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy.
Discuss the materials and construction techniques intended for the building and the site with attention
directed to ensuring an enduring quality is achieved, especially considering whether the proposal is a
background or foreground element of the district.
The building is proposed to be clad in brick with thoughtful fenestration and surface articulation. Large windows
will permit access to daylight for the interior spaces and help activate the pedestrian experience with unobstructed
views into the retail space. Divided lites in the windows and a steel protective canopy over the entry walkways will
help relate the larger openings down to the human scale. Landscaping on the south, north and west side yards
will provide much needed pervious surface and help to soften the edge conditions of the property.
What qualities of the proposal will be most valued by the community in 50 years?
As a traditional two-story brick building with hints of cleaner, modern lines and materials (the steel entry canopy
and pergola on the roof deck) the proposed structure will have an enduring aesthetic that will age gracefully and
not date itself to any particular decade.
Describe the ways in which the proposal highlights human activity in the building and on the site,
especially when viewed from adjacent or nearby public ways?
As mentioned above, the large windows will allow the public a clear view into the first floor retail spaces of the
building. The large widows on the second floor will communicate the business activity occurring on the second
floor, while the partially vegetated roof deck at the front of the building will introduce additional visual interest to
the district.
In what ways does the proposal enhance the economic vibrancy of the district?
The proposed building is a mixed-use structure, with retail on the ground floor and business offices on the lower
walk-out and second levels. This diversity of uses is critical to ensuring a long-term viability of the project.
How does the proposal adapt itself to changing economic opportunities of the community and the
district?
As mentioned above, the diversity of uses within the building will allow the building to adapt to changing market
demands. Should market forces favor one use over another, there would be little difficulty in making the
necessary changes to the spaces to allow flexibility of uses.
Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive
and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district.
Describe the ways in which the proposal is self-supporting related to on- and off-site infrastructure and
resources.
As discussed in previous responses, we will need to supplement on-site parking with district or contracted parking
elsewhere. The developer is undertaking a life-cycle cost analysis on installing photovoltaic panels over roughly
one-third of the roof area. Coupled with LED lighting, occupancy sensors and large south-facing windows, the
developer is attempting to reduce demand to the existing electrical grid. The project will connect into existing
public utilities below France Avenue, and storm water will be managed on site to meet city requirements, such that
there is no peak increase in net flow to neighboring properties.
What impacts does the proposal pose on existing on- and off-site infrastructure?
Please see above response.
What elements of the proposal support infrastructure needs of adjacent or nearby sites?
None.
Describe the infrastructure features of the proposal that are truly extraordinary by relating the
ATTACHMENT F France Avenue Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 30
performance of those features to current standards, requirements, or best practices.
We are not able to comment in detail at this stage of the design process.
How the proposal relies on infrastructure of the district for baseline performance?
We are not able to comment in detail at this stage of the design process.
Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating movement of
people within and to the district.
What features and amenities does the proposal lend to the public realm of the district?
The developer is proposing placing bike racks on the site and will be investigating the potential of creating one EV
charging/parking station.
What features and amenities does the proposal introduce to extend the sense of an expansive and engaging public realm to its site?
Ground level retail and site lighting will help to enliven the pedestrian experience
Demonstrate the ways in which the proposal supports pedestrians and bicyclists movement and identify those nearby district features that are important destinations.
Bicycle parking will be provided near the front to the proposed building. The curb cut and concrete valley gutter at
the entrance will employ markings to alert motor vehicle operators of the crossing bike and pedestrian paths
What features does the proposal employ to ensure a safe and inviting pedestrian experience on the site?
Please see previous answer. Additionally, a concrete entry walk will provide separation between the building
entrances and asphalt drive area.
Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive
relationships without “leftover” spaces on sites.
How does the proposal relate in terms of scale to it neighbors?
The proposed development is two levels above grade with a walk-out lower level at the back of the site. The
existing property to the south contains a two-level structure, and the property to the north houses a one-level retail
development.
How does the proposal make full use of the available site, especially those portions of the site not occupied by parking and buildings?
The side yard setback on the south, and the rear yard setback at the west will be planted with trees, native and
pollinator-friendly plants. These areas will be utilized to help mitigate storm water run-off.
How does the proposal interact with its neighbors?
Describe the zones of activity created by the proposal and compare those areas to zones of activity on adjacent and nearby sites.
As described in previous responses, for many reasons, the parking is proposed to be located at the front of the
structure, accessed directly off of France Avenue. The parking on either side of the proposed development is also
located in the front yard setback, accessed directly off of France Avenue. The front face of the new proposed
building is located very close to the front face of the existing structure on site as well as the existing neighboring
buildings on the north and south. The proposed development sits near the southern end of the district. One
additional commercial parcel exists to the south of the proposed development, after which, the neighborhood
quickly transitions to single-family residential. We feel that since the immediately adjacent neighboring building to
the north is relatively new, and set back with parking in the front, it would not make sense to have our proposed
development pulled closer to the street. This would reduce visibility for existing vehicles from their parking lot,
but also create a stepped street presence with the buildings, negating the desire for a gradual transition from the
higher density intersection of Sunnyside Road and France Avenue to the residential properties to the south of the
proposed development.
Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves.
How does this proposal enhance key elements of environmental health (air, water, noise, habitat)?
As discussed previously, although not developed with our landscape architect yet, we will be investigating native
plantings and bee-friendly pollinator plants. Furthermore, we will be working to divert roof drain runoff into above-
ground cisterns to collect rainwater for use as landscape irrigation water. A partially vegetated roof will assist in
reducing heat-island effects and capturing storm water and the developer is investigating photovoltaic panels on
the roof as a method for partially offsetting demand on the local power grid.
How does proposal mitigate any negative impacts on environmental health on its own site?
Please see previous answer.
How does proposal provide for a healthful environment beyond the current condition?
Please see previous answer.
Describe ways in which human health needs are advanced by the proposal.
With a narrow floor plate and large windows on the south side, natural daylight will penetrate deep into the retail
and office spaces. While the potential heat gains can be mitigated with coatings and shading devices, the natural
daylight and operable windows for all employees is incredibly important to mental and physical health.
Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated problems.
Identify the problems posed by the proposal or the district requiring innovative solutions and describe the ways in which the proposal responds?
As previously discussed, parking will be the biggest obstacle to overcome. Parking agreements with adjacent
developments and/or district parking, coupled with on-street parking on the west side of France Avenue will help
to mitigate the issue. Without flexibility on parking requirements, the site becomes financially infeasible and
undevelopable, except as a surface parking lot. With the narrow width of the lot, the district’s desire for first floor
retail instead of covered parking, and the circulation requirements of vehicles, sub-surface parking would need to
extend down 5 levels to come close to providing the amount of parking currently required by strict adherence to
the zoning ordinances.
Describe the metrics to be used to compare the innovations posed by the proposal.
N/A at this time
For those solutions posed by the proposal as innovative, describe how they might become “best practices” for the district.
N/A at this time
Describe innovations in systems and aesthetics and the ways in which systems and aesthetics for integrated solutions.
N/A at this time
Describe other projects where innovations similar to those included in the proposal have been employed.
N/A at this time
ATTACHMENT F France Avenue Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions
plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.comLandmark Building Proposed Development June 19, 2018 Page 31
ATTACHMENT F France Avenue Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions
Promote well-balanced aggregations of “come to” and “stay at” places focused on
human activity and linked to an engaging public realm.
How does the proposal complement the mix of uses in the district?
The 44th and France business area is rich with a mix of retail, small business and hospitality establishments. The
proposed development’s mix of retail and small business will provide much desired additional economic vitality.
Describe the proposal in terms of “come to” and/or “stay at” places.
The first floor of the proposed development will primarily house an established and proven retail business
focused on home furnishings, along with real estate offices. The pedestrian traffic encouraged by both of these
businesses will add to the economic vitality of the district.
What adjacent or nearby “come to” or “stay at” places does the proposal rely on for vitality?
The on-site employees of the business offices on the lower and upper levels of the proposed development will
add to the local population that support the local businesses on a regular basis.
Demonstrate the flows of activity generated by the site during a typical weekday and weekend day.
In what ways does the proposal interact with surrounding sites to encourage an engaging public realm?
During the weekday, the main level retail space will be welcoming patrons throughout the day. The employees
of the lower and upper level business will be coming and going, perhaps enjoying lunch or dinner on the rooftop
patio dedicated to the users of the building. The main level real estate offices and retail space will be welcoming
customers and walk-ins throughout the weekend.
Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district
and the community.
Describe the proposal in terms of its economic contributions to the district.
The on-site employees of the business offices on the lower and upper levels of the proposed development will
add to the local population that support the local businesses on a regular basis.
How does the proposal enhance development on adjacent or nearby sites?
This proposal enhances the development opportunities on adjacent or nearby sites by holding a high standard of
design and best use on the smaller sites available in the district. Our proposal provides the desired mixed-use,
bringing more people into the district to support new development.
What features of the site or district limit the potential of the proposal from being fully realized?
The site provides many challenges due to its limited size. The development team has thoughtfully created a
proposal that enhances, without maximizing, the site to its best use.
Why is the proposal best situated on its proposed site from the perspective of economic vitality?
The proposed uses and tenants in this proposal will provide continued services and support to the district as well
as Edina as a whole.
How does the proposal make the district and the community a better place?
The proposal will provide a first-class, timeless and approachable building that compliments the historic nature of
the district. The full-time office and retail workers will support the surrounding restaurants and retail shops and
service offerings. The scale of the building enhances and supports the vision of the district.
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.B.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:MJ Lamon, P rojec t C oordinator
Item Activity:
Subject:2018-2019 S tudent C ommis s ion Appointments Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
Adopt the recommended student appointments.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
S ee staff report.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Staff Report
June 19, 2018
Mayor & City Council
MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator
2018-2019 Student Commission Appointments
Information / Background:
This year the City received 29 applications for student commission positions. There are 16 commission
seats available for student members every year.
Council members, Bob Stewart and Mary Brindle interviewed the applicants on May 30 and June 4.
The following are the recommended alternates and appointments to start 9/1/18 and end 9/1/19:
Commission Appointed Alternate
Arts & Culture Commission Marnie Pardo
Shreya Konkimalla
Tayden Erickson
Community Health Commission Om Jahagirdar
Anushka Thorat
Matthew Ruppert
Energy & Environment Commission Madeline Fernands
Chloe Maynor
Libby Heitzman
Heritage Preservation Commission Arjun Maheshwari
Simon Venell
Keegan Clark
Human Rights & Relations Commission Shin Bee Waldron
Tiara Moss-Keys
Mythili Iyer
Park & Recreation Commission Bryn Osborne
Aiden Anderson
Owen Brown
Planning Commission Isabel Melton
Yash Mangalick
Isaac Owens-Pierre
Transportation Commission Yeukai Zimbwa
Emmanuel Ayelomi
Theo Teske
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.C .
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
R eport / R ecommendation
F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk
Item Activity:
Subject:R es olution No. 2018-53: Acc epting Various G rants &
Donations
Ac tion
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
M otion adopting R esolution No. 2018-53.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
To comply with S tate S tatutes, all donations to the C ity must be adopted by a resolution approved by four
favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the
various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Resolution No. 2018-53 Donations
RESOLUTION NO. 2018-53
ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or
personal property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two
thirds majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere
appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens.
Parks & Recreation: Braemar Memorial Fund
E.L. Nord $25.00 Braemar Memorial Fund
Jack Isaaman $50.00 Braemar Memorial Fund
Parks & Recreation:
Andy Warczak $1,400.00 Two-nine foot spaded trees Strauchauer Park
Fire Department:
Edina Community Foundation $10,900.00 Lucas 3 CPR Device
SMSC Organics Recycling Facility 12 yards brown mulch Fire Station 1 Landscape
Dated: June 19, 2018
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 19, 2018, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________.
City Clerk
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I I.A.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
F rom:S haron Allis on, Executive As s is tant
Item Activity:
Subject:C orres pondence Information
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
None.
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
T here are no correspondences since the last City Council meeting.
Date: June 19, 2018 Agenda Item #: XI I.
To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type:
F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk
Item Activity:
Subject:S chedule of Meetings and Events as of June 19, 2018 Information
C ITY O F E D IN A
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED:
None
I N TR O D U C TI O N:
S ee attached.
AT TAC HME N T S:
Description
Schedule of Meetings & Events as of June 19, 2018
CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF JUNE 19, 2018
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS
Thur June 14 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Mon June 18 Special HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Mon June 18 Race & Equity Final Check-in & Recognition Event 6:00-8:00 P.M. VALLIERE RM @ BRAEMAR
Tues June19 Joint Meeting: Human Rights & Relations Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Work Session: Golf Course Construction Update 6:15 P.M., COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thur June 28 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Wed July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed
Wed July 4 Edina’s Fourth of July Parade – Starts behind Edina City Hall 10:00 A,M,
Tues July 17 Work Session: CRBPS Assess Management 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Southdale Small Area Plan 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thur July 26 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues July 31 City Council Candidate Filing Opens 8:00 A.M. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
Tues Aug 7 Nite To Unite
Wed Aug 8 Work Session: CIP 2-19-2023/City Enterprises (Cost Recovery Formulas) 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues Aug 14 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY – Polls open 7 A.M. THROUGH 8 P.M,
City Council Candidate Filing Closes – City Clerk’s Office remains open until 5:00 p.m. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE
Thur Aug 16 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Tues Aug 21 Work Session: Community Engagement Planning 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS