Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-06-05 City Council Regular Meeting PacketAgenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota City Cou n cil Cham be rs Tuesday, June 5, 2018 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting. V.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All a genda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be remov ed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes: Work Session of May 15, 2018, and Regular Meeting of May 15, 2018 B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre List Dated 05/10/2018 TOTAL: $901,343.18, Pre-List Dated 05/17/2018 TOTAL: $962,693.09 AND Pre-List Dated 05/24/2018 TOTAL: $784,896.54 C.Second Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement with Edina Market Street, LLC D.Resolution 2018-49: Supporting A)ordably-Priced Housing at 4100 West 76th Street and Receptivity to Metropolitan Council Funding E.Resolution No. 2018-52: Authorizing Edina Liquor On-Sale Distillery For Charitable Event June 25, 2018 at Centennial Lakes F.Ordinance 2018-08: Boards, Committees, Commissions Student Membership City Code Section 2-80 G.Second Amendment to Lease: Hornets Nest H.Response to Creek Knoll A Neighborhood Petition Received May 1, 2018 I.Revised Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy J.Request for Purchase: ENG 18-6 France Avenue Sidewalk K.Request for Purchase: ENG 18-10 Valley View Sidewalk Phase 1 L.Request for Purchase: York Avenue Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension Planning M.Request for Purchase: Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation N.Parks & Recreation Commission Work Plan Addition VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Speak Up, Edina! Municipal Tree Sales VII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eJcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2018-11 and Resolution No. 2018-50; Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for Pentagon Park South, 4815 & 4901 77th Street and 7710 Computer Avenue for Solomon Real Estate Group VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Resolution No. 2018-51: Awarding the Sale of $5,780,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A B.Ordinance No. 2018-10: Amend City Code Concerning Limited Parking Zones C.Ordinance No. 2018-09, Resolutions Nos. 2018-47 & 2018-48; Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Preliminary Rezoning with Preliminary Development Plan for France Equities LLC, 7250 France Avenue IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondence B.Minutes 1.Minutes: Energy & Environment Commission Aril 12, 2018 2.Minutes: Heritage Preservation Commission, April 10, 2018 3.Minutes: Planning Commission April 25, 2018 4.Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission, April 24, 2018 X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor And Council Comments A.Race & Equity Task Force Final Report Follow-up XII.Manager's Comments XIII.Schedule of Meetings and Events as of June 5, 2018 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all res idents to be c om fortable being part of the public proc ess . If you need as sistance in the way of hearing ampliNc ation, an interpreter, large-print documents or s om ething els e, pleas e c all 952-927-8861 72 hours in advanc e of the m eeting. Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: Minutes F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes : Work S es s ion of May 15, 2018, and R egular Meeting of May 15, 2018 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve M inutes as presented. I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Draft May 15, 2018 Work Session Minutes Draft May 15, 2018 Regular City Council Minutes MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TUESDAY, MAY 15, 2018 5:30 P.M. Mayor Jim Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:32 p.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Brindle, Stewart and Mayor Hovland. Members Fischer and Staunton entered the meeting at 5:40 p.m. Edina City staff attending the meeting were: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communication and Technology Services, Director; Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Chante Mitchell, City Management Fellow; Scott Neal, City Manager and Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager. EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT DR. JOHN W. SCHULTZ Dr. Schultz updated the City Council regarding: the increasing diversity of the student body, consistency of resident vs. open enrollment, four-year graduation rate of 96.2%, average ACT scores remain high, as well as many other standards of excellence at Edina Public Schools. JOINT MEETING: ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION (ECC) Energy and Environment Commissioners attending: Carolyn Jackson, Chair, Richard Manser, Vice Chair and Melissa Seeley. Chair Jackson along with Vice Chair Manser and Commissioner Seeley updated the Council on the ECC’s 2018 Work Plan. Items to note: the working groups Education and Residential Outreach have merged, the involvement in actively getting organics in Edina, input into the Comprehensive Plan so that environmental and energy concerns are reviewed before decisions are made yielding practical outcome, and possible development of annual energy awards. The Council thanked the EEC for their work. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, _____________________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by the Edina City Council, May 1, 2018. _____________________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 15, 2018 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS PRESENTED Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to approve the agenda as presented. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT Arnie Bigbee, 7621 Edinborough, congratulated the Council on its established goals and objectives for 2018- 2019. He said the Council reflected important goals for the City. Mr. Bigbee thanked the Council for making the goals available for the community to read. Mohammed Rasulberbiev, 7400 3rd Avenue, Richfield, noted he had presented an offer for the City-owned land at 7500 Xerxes Avenue South. He outlined reasons why he should be given the opportunity to purchase this property. Manager Neal explained that a sealed bid process would occur on June 12, 2018, for the property. Chris Hubert, 5845 Creek Valley Road, shared concerns regarding the lower fields at Edina High School noise, traffic, speed, safety, and parking on their cul-de-sac. It was noted that staff would address traffic, parking, and speed, but the property operation was under Edina Public Schools. Jim Walsh, 5853 Creek Valley Road, referred to the Edina High School athletic fields problems with traffic and speed and requested a better police presence. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, stated he was not pleased with the Council’s approval of the Guitar Center site since in his opinion the structure was not an appropriate height for Edina. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Fischer a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as follows: V.A. Approve minutes of May 1, 2018, Work Session meeting and May 1, 2018, Regular Council meeting V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on pre-list dated April 26, 2018, and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $234,670.95, Police Special Revenue $6,982.31, Conservation & Sustainability $7,000.00, Working Capital Fund $14,379.57, Equipment Replacement Fund $349.50, Art Center Fund $816.04, Golf Dome Fund $5,002.92, Aquatic Center Fund $1,232.96, Golf Course Fund $6,626.20, Ice Arena Fund $8,732.10, Sports Dome Fund $10,159.15, Edinborough Park Fund $15,019.60, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $3,837.61, Liquor Fund $167,810.19, Utility Fund $73,890.15, Storm Sewer Fund $630.04, Risk Mgmt ISF $297,614.99, PSTF Agency Fund $4,728.44, HRA Administration $575.00, Centennial TIF District $29,103.41, South Dale 2 District $575.00, Payroll Fund $1,811.59: Total $891,547.72; and per pre-list dated Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2018 Page 2 May 3, 2018, consisting of 33 pages: General Fund $180,051.14, Police Special Revenue $23,424.75, Working Capital Fund $30,123.59, Equipment Replacement Fund $217,255.00, Art Center Fund $202.79, Golf Dome Fund $315.60, Aquatic Center Fund $719.82, Golf Course Fund $22,066.71, Ice Arena Fund $27,758.75, Sports Dome Fund $11.25, Edinborough Park Fund $5,960.42, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $224.52, Liquor Fund $239,374.29, Utility Fund $34,147.47, Storm Sewer Fund $2,602.09, Risk Mgmt ISF $331,323.47, PSTF Agency Fund $2,514.53, MN Task Force 1 Fund $5,889.36, Centennial TIF District $1,029,274.74Total $2,153,240.29; and credit card transactions dated February 27-March 26, 2018, and consisting of 19 pages: General Fund $33,006.68, PIR Construction Fund, Equipment Replacement Fund $436.82, Art Center Fund $126.87, Golf Dome Fund $82.64, Aquatic Center Fund $25.00, Golf Course Fund $5,391.46, Ice Arena Fund $5,244.88, Sports Dome Fund $140.61, Edinborough Park Fund $477.65, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $2,735.74, Liquor Fund $2,056.16, Utility Fund $5,099.09, PSTF Agency Fund $1,514.87, MN Task Force 1 Fund $415.16, Centennial TIF District $196.40: Total $56,950.03 V.C. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midway Ford, 2018 Ford F150 with Ecoboost Engine, $34,613.93 V.D. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidders, EESCO, SCADA PLC and Panel View Upgrades, $36,937.20 V.E. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidders, Barr Engineering, Engineering Services for Lift Station #6, $35,000 V.F. Adopt Resolution No. 2018-46 Approving Quit Claim Deed with Southdale Office Partners, LLC V.G. Approve Traffic Safety Report of April 3, 2018 V.H. Adopt Resolution 2018-44 Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Agreement V.I. Appoint Dena Soukup to the Community Health Commission with a partial term ending 3/1/19. V.J. Approve 2018 City Council Meeting Schedule Change V.K. Approve Contract Addendum: Mid America Golf and Landscape V.L. Approve Braemar Lease Agreement: Red River Kitchen Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS VI.A. EDINA GIRLS HOCKEY TEAM 2018 STATE CHAMPIONS – RECOGNIZED Mayor Hovland introduced the Edina High School girls hockey team and congratulated them on their 2018 State Championship. Team members included: Emily Oden, Brooke Tucker, Tella Jungels-Mallory Uihlein, Lucy Bowlby, Eva Hendrikson, CC Bowlby, Savanna Atol, Loli Fidler, Megan Smith, Hannah Chorske, Elli Strittmater, Olivia Swaim, Kristina Collins, Annie Kuehl, Bella Orthey, Aliyah Lance, Maggie Dronen, and Sophia Doll, and coaches: Sami Reber, Edina Girls Hockey Head Coach; Josh Reber, Edina Girls Hockey Assistant Coach; Ellie Lee, Edina Girls Hockey Assistant Coach; andScott Ryerse, Edina Girls Hockey Assistant Coach. VI.B. 2018 EMS WEEK – PROCLAIMED Fire Chief Schmitz shared his pride in his staff for their response and delivery of emergency services to the community and thanked the Council for the Proclamation. Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, adopting the proclamation declaring May 20-26, 2018, as 2018 EMS Week. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VI.C. 2018 NATIONAL POLICE WEEK PROCLAMATION – PROCLAIMED Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2018 Page 3 Mayor Hovland announced Peace Officers Memorial Day and referred to the ceremony held earlier in the day that honored all members and thanked the Police Department for their service to the City. Police Sergeant Aaron White thanked the Council for the Proclamation and recognized Wayzata Police Department Officer William Matthews whose name was added to the memorial and Edina Officer Mike Blood who was seriously injured during a bank robbery. He thanked everyone for their support of police officers. The Council thanked the members for their service and a round of applause was offered by the audience. Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, adopting the proclamation declaring May 13-19 National Police Week. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VI.D. PRESEVERATION MONTH MAY 2018 AND 2018 EDINA HERITAGE AWARD – PROCLAIMED Member Stewart made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, adopting the proclamation declaring May 2018 as Preservation Month. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. Assistant Planner Bodecker presented the 2018 Edina Heritage Award to the Mueller family, shared photos of their home at 6500 Parnell Avenue South and commended the Muellers for restoring their home to its original condition. Mr. Mueller thanked the Council for the recognition and shared how pleased they were to be residents of Edina. A round of applause was offered by the audience. VI.E. 2018 NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK – PROCLAIMED Public Works Director Olson shared the 2018 National Public Works Week theme was the "Power of Public Works" and recognized all staff who worked hard to provide clean water, dispose solid waste, build roads and bridges and remove snow on roadways and invited the community to the Public Works Open House on Saturday, May 19, 2018. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, adopting the proclamation declaring May 20-26, 2018, as 2018 National Public Works Week. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VI.F. RACE AND EQUITY FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS – RECEIVED Jessi Kingston, Co-Chair of the Race and Equity Task Force, thanked the Council for their support of Edina’s Race and Equity initiative and requested adoption of the Task Force recommendations. She shared an overview of the process used that included interviews and online surveys and shared the 2017 quality of life survey results. Co-Chair James Pierce said the report outlined 21 recommendations with key themes and reviewed a subset of recommendations that included ensuring a feeling of belonging and the recommendation to name a future facility after Beverly and Ellen Yancey. He said explained a demonstrated commitment and accountability to eliminate racial inequities should include hiring a Race and Equity Manager who would ensure policies and procedures that eliminated racial inequities and the creation of a resident oversight board. Ms. Kingston shared best practices examples and the remaining evaluation process with an expectation of the plan to go into practice by the year end. Mr. Pierce recognized all who participated in the process and the City’s goal to foster inclusivity. A round of applause was offered by the audience. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2018 Page 4 The Council thanked the Task Force for their hard work and stressed how important this was to ensure that all residents felt that they belonged in the community. Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart and Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart and Mayor Hovland, to accept the Race and Equity Final Report and refer to staff for further analysis with respect to recommendations made by the Task Force. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS VII.A. ORDINANCE NO. 2018-09, RESOLUTION NOS. 2018-47 AND 2018-48: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY REZONING WITH PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FRANCE EQUITIES LLC, 7250 FRANCE AVENUE - POSTPONED Community Development Director Presentation Community Development Director Teague said France Equities LLC was requesting redevelopment of the 1.68-acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue that included a 6-7-story, 135-unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces, 20% of the units would meet the affordable housing requirement, and retail and office space of 19,000 square feet. He explained that 35 surface parking spaces would be for the retail use and the project would be sustainable with pedestrian and vehicular access proposed to the lot to the north (7200 France) with an amenity terrace and pool. He outlined the site plan, closest residential properties, zoning, and sketch plan revisions that included an increased setback on France Avenue on the west side and a walkway. Mr. Teague noted Hennepin County was not allowing City access but the applicant was willing to dedicate an easement for future access should the City acquire it and would still construct the woonerf. He commented on the traffic study which noted no necessary road improvement at this time and that parking was adequate as well. Mr. Teague outlined building materials and explained the primary issue was whether the Comprehensive Plan amendment regarding density was reasonable and justified the PUD rezoning of the site. The Council asked questions regarding the Greater Southdale Working Group comments and the access of France Avenue. Mr. Teague shared the Working Group’s concerns with the 50-foot setback and the way the building covered the pedestrian and roadway connection which had been addressed as well as the stepped-in sixth story to address the mass feel of the building towards the residential homes and explained the County’s unwillingness to provide additional access due to spacing of stoplights to the south. Applicant Presentation Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects, highlighted the regional bikeway accommodations and commented if Hennepin County continued to limit access it would result in a different vision of France Avenue. He explained how they attempted to create smaller blocks and connectivity and were limited in the number of stories due to materials. He said they wanted to incorporate affordable housing units into the scope and include a bike shop for bikeway and pedestrian traffic but would not go all the way to 72nd Street. He described underground parking that allowed for additional retail in the future, reviewed selected materials, and the green roof component. The Council inquired about the extent of stucco, the affordable housing component that satisfied the City policy based on height, mid-block connections, and ways to engage dialogue again with Hennepin County. Mr. Dovolis said they chose 20% affordable units because it provided a broader breadth of opportunity. Mr. Neal noted the County was open to the easement in late 2014 but with staff changes had since changed their direction. The Council inquired asked about safety of the existing parking structure. Mr. Teague said the parking ramp was in poor condition and may be closed to parking access yet this summer. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2018 Page 5 Public Testimony Mike Linfield, 6913 Hillcrest Lane, addressed the Council. Dan Petrosky, 7204 Oaklawn, addressed the Council. Megan Wetzel, 7333 Gallagher Drive, addressed the Council. Avan Johnson, 7137 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Marie Johnson, 7137 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Emily Christy, 7316 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Patricia Schreiber, 6713 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Yolanda Petre, 6930 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. John Carlson, 4433 Ellsworth Drive, addressed the Council. Matthew McGivney, 6901 Hillcrest Lane, addressed the Council. Paul Rosenthal, 4722 Hibiscus Avenue, addressed the Council. Steve Brown, 7205 Bristol Circle, addressed the Council. Dennis Withers, 4504 Sedum Lane, addressed the Council. Mark Peterson, 7330 - Cedars of Edina, addressed the Council. Bob Gubrud, 4421 Ellsworth Drive, addressed the Council. Rebecca Nye, 6313 Peasedale, addressed the Council. Matt Prok, 7009 Heatherton Trail, addressed the Council. Lisa Roberts, 6801 Southdale Road, addressed the Council. Nora Davis, 6921 Southdale Road, addressed the Council. Bruce McCarthy, 6708 Point Drive, addressed the Council. Ralph Zickert, 4311 Cornelia Circle, addressed the Council. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council. Frank Lorenz, 7151 York Avenue South, addressed the Council. Sandy Carlson, 4433 Ellsworth Drive, addressed the Council. Mark Chamberlain, 7004 Bristol Boulevard, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2018 Page 6 Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland. Motion carried. Ed Terhaar, Wenck, answered questions raised during public testimony regarding the traffic study and using 72nd Street as result of this development. He said the proposed development would take into account those trips already on site, noting there was not enough traffic added to affect capacity today. He stated the level of service did not change at the intersection of 72nd Street and France Avenue and the number of trips added minimized that impact. The Council asked about increased traffic on Gallagher and the differences between traffic impacts from a medical office and residential. Mr. Terhaar said the access location was similar to the existing location and with one removed and the other remaining, they did not anticipate increased traffic impacts with this project. He explained the net increase would only be one trip every one-two minutes because the site already had traffic. Mr. Teague responded to concerns raised about the PUD and said it met the goals of pedestrian-oriented development, affordable housing, enhanced greenspace, and additional connections that satisfied the PUD criteria. He explained the give-to-get concept and how the PUD was a tool to acquire affordable housing and right-of-way access to the north that could not be required through standard zoning. The Council asked about concerns around transparency, notification requirements, property description discrepancy, and stormwater concerns. Mr. Teague explained that all legal requirements were met but noted the South Cornelia neighborhood was not notified for the Planning Commission public hearing as staff was unaware that they were an official neighborhood association. He added there were neighborhood meetings and notices sent to homes within 1,000 feet, two public hearings, and notice in the local newspaper and website. City Attorney Knutson confirmed while the number of stories in the notice differed the property description was adequate in the notice. Mr. Millner said the existing site had little to no affect on stormwater management and noted the project would likely improve rate and water control. The Council referred to comments in the public testimony regarding population doubling in the Southdale district and potential overbuilding. Mr. Teague said the Comprehensive Plan envisioned a high population only if fully developed which would be 50+ years into the future. Mr. Neal commented on unit absorption and stated the economy and market were strong that allowed for quite a bit of capacity for units within the Twin Cities. The Council inquired about height limit implementation and Corridors of Commerce funding for lane capacity on France Avenue. Mr. Teague said the Comprehensive Plan suggested heights but the zoning allowed for Council consideration of any height above the restriction which did not require Metropolitan Council approval. Mr. Terhaar said there would be some increased cut-through traffic from this project but most would use Gallagher instead of 72nd Street. The Council confirmed the traffic study was sufficient and clarified that while the developer pays, the City hires the consultant. They commented on using height as a way to achieve affordable housing and how changes affected an entire area. Mr. Teague said cost had to be offset so increased density was one way to provide affordable housing and suggested a sub-district could be created to increase density on this site but not throughout the entire zoned area. The Council raised concerns about stormwater solutions for this site only and that it should be more comprehensive. Mr. Millner agreed but noted it would be difficult to coordinate the developers’ projects. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2018 Page 7 The Council asked about process and combining building approval with the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Teague said the project could not occur without a Comprehensive Plan amendment and the sub-district concept would create a density within a district different than others in the area. Mr. Knutson clarified that any precedent would not apply for future projects and the rationale would be the basis for the Council’s decision instead. He advised the applicant, by law, had the right to apply for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning simultaneously. The Council shared comments about the Southdale Working Group and their work, how France Avenue/Gallagher had outstanding public realm but did not make a reasonable effort to transition to the west side, and feeling that the project was too much for the area. The Council indicated the goal was to make the neighborhood better and recognized that effort and work towards that goal. Motion by Member Fischer, seconded by Member Brindle, to postpone consideration of Resolution No. 2018-47 Approving a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Regarding Density in the OR, Office Residential District; Resolution No. 2018-48 Approving Preliminary Rezoning From POD, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development – 15, including Preliminary Development Plan for 7250 LLC; and, Ordinance No. 2018-09 Amending the Zoning Ordinance to Establish the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development-15 Zoning District to the June 5, 2018. Regular City Council meeting. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS – (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted). VIII.A. ARDEN PARK SIXTY PERCENT DESIGN CHECK-IN – REPORT RECEIVED Parks and Recreation Director Kattreh reviewed the Arden Park concept plan 60% design check-in and asked Council to authorize staff to proceed to the 90% design check-in, complete and publish the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), and provide direction on Ash tree management. She shared an overview of the project and status briefing, reviewed the Pamela Park Building, design goals and project elements, and outlined the schedule and budget. Renae Clark, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, shared an updated sketch plan that incorporated changes from April’s meeting, new storm water management features, trails, orientation location of the shelter building with respect to the trail, creek alignment that provided access for fishing and recreational access, the area around the 54th Street bridge, and trails and bridge materials that included the boardwalk. The Council asked questions regarding the need for a railing and funding assistance for tree removal. Ms. Clark confirmed a railing was intended to be part of the stair design and that there would be some shared costs and funding established for this project. Ms. Kattreh said there were 457 trees in the project area with an estimated 68 trees to be removed, significantly lower than the last estimate. She said staff recommended treatment of three significant trees and shared how the Parks and Recreation Commission recommended removal of all 77 trees with 1:1 replacement plan with the largest diameter tree possible. She noted staff did not want to remove too many trees in order to not destabilize the area. Ms. Kattreh shared the park building design with the favored shed roof design. She said the orientation would be north/south and included gender-neutral restrooms, views from the south towards the creek, and would value exterior and interior space equally. The Council expressed concerns regarding maintenance for both sedum and cedar roofs and suggested location of snow barriers above any doorways. They said they were pleased the Pamela Park building’s maximized windows and suggested pulling the creek in on the west side to focus on the beauty of the creek. Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2018 Page 8 Engineering Services Manager Bintner shared stormwater management system details, swales, mandatory EAW requirements, budget and funding estimates for a total scope close to the preliminary estimate but was currently $181,609 over budget at this point. The Council requested trees identified in the inventory be clearly marked and staked prior to removal. The Council inquired about the warming house and keeping the building on the same pad as a fixed point, the boardwalk and remeandering the stream, and replanking the existing bridge. Mr. Bintner explained the boardwalk relocation was not realistic due to the current flood plain which could affect design choices, adding changes could affect channel dynamics. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to: 1. Authorize staff to continue moving forward with the 90% design phase of the Arden Park renovation project; 2. Authorize staff to finalize and publish the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW); and, 3. Authorize removal of 77 Ash trees as part of Ash tree management. The Council acknowledged the three treatable Ash trees were in accessible locations. The Council thanked staff and the Park and Recreation Commission for its work on this project. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION 2018-43 ADOPTED - ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS - ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-43 accepting various grants and donations. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES 1. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION APRIL 10, 2018 Informational; no action required. IX.C. ADVISORY COMMUNICATION IX.C.1. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION – ADDITIONAL WORK PLAN ITEM – EXPLORE ALTERNATIVE FUNDING MODEL(S) – Received X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XII.A. 2018 Q1 QUARTERLY BUSINESS REPORT – Received XII.B. 2017 PRELIMINARY YEAR END FINANCIAL REPORT – Received Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2018 Page 9 XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF MAY 15, 2018 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 12:43 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 5, 2018. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the May 15, 2018, meeting available. Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.B. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: F rom:Don Uram, F inance Director Item Activity: Subject:R eceive P ayment of C laims As P er: P re List Dated 05/10/2018 TO TAL: $901,343.18, P re-List Dated 05/17/2018 TO TAL: $962,693.09 AND P re-Lis t Dated 05/24/2018 TO TAL: $784,896.54 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve claims for payment. I N TR O D U C TI O N: C laim information for approval is attached. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Claims Pre List Dated 05/10/2018 TOTAL: $901,343.18 Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 05/17/2018 TOTAL: $962,693.09 Claims Pre-Lis t Dated 05/24/2018 TOTAL: $784,896.54 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page- 1 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 - Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6390 5/10/2018 133644 A DYNAMIC DOOR CO INC. 3,529.62 DOOR REPAIR 459850 21803224 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,526.27 DOOR REPAIR 459851 21804241 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,461.67 DOORS 459848 21805014 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 340.88 DOOR REPAIR 459761 21805015 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 825.28 DOORS 459770 21805017 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9,683.72 6391 5/10/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 51.87 459777 2230821 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 51.87 6392 5/10/2018 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 162.48 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE 459723 162033 5422.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 119.25 FIRE EXTIGUISHER INSPECTION 459678 162034 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 281.73 6393 5/10/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 89.55 459682 63976400 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,579.40 459672 64027900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 268.65 459861 64058500 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 49.67 459671 97550200 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,987.27 6394 5/10/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 81.94 MID-TERM CHECK IN MEETING 459811 138857 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING 11.63 PAPER 459841 138885 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 93.57 6395 5/10/2018 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 27,704.75 NORTH RAMP - SPECIAL INSPECTIO 459609 B126428 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 27,704.75 6396 5/10/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 16.75- OFFICE SUPPLIES 459612 M-16190004 1600.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 34.16 SUPPLIES 459814 WO-380404-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 17.41 6397 5/10/2018 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 69.45 PARTS FOR PRINTERS IN SQUADS 459607 MMT6328 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.45 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page- 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 — Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6397 6398 5/10/2018 5/10/2018 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 102519 CHIEF'S TOWING INC Continued... 337.10 459756 634045 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 337.10 6399 5/10/2018 105693 CITYSPRINT 19.36 DELIVERY TO CAMPBELL KNUTSON 459840 41167 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 19.36 6400 5/10/2018 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 1,224.00 50TH STREET RAMPS CLEANING 459853 7070250423 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,450.00 CITY HALL CLEANING 459852 7070250650 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 3,674.00 6401 5/10/2018 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL 733.50 LESSONS 4/18-5/2/18 459712 5418 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 733.50 6402 5/10/2018 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 459816 2476987 1263.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENT 425.00 6403 5/10/2018 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 8,290.00 SNYDER S/W 62ND 459752 15063 01445.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION W 62nd St 8,290.00 6404 5/10/2018 132592 J.F. AHERN CO. 260.00 GOLF DOME SPRINKLER INSPECTION 459725 254646 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 260.00 6405 5/10/2018 115192 KNUDSON, DEBORAH 1,286.00 LESSONS 4/18-5/2/18 459711 5418 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,286.00 6406 5/10/2018 100869 MARTIN-MCALLISTER 1,000.00 459803 11716 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 1,000.00 6407 5/10/2018 103944 MED COMPASS 168.00 ANNUAL MEDICAL EXAMS 459605 32839 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 - Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6407 6408 5/10/2018 103944 MED COMPASS 101483 MENARDS Continued-. 5/10/2018 168.00 208.80 TAKEDOWN SUPPLIES 459797 066855 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 5.99 KICKDOWN DOOR STOP 459584 67196 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 81.04 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL 459684 67303 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 52.86 LUMBER FOR MAILBOX POST 459683 67304 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 98.81 CONSTRUCTION MATREIAL 459706 67440 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 55.96 NET MAINTENANCE 459798 67461 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 503.46 6409 5/10/2018 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPPLY 618.24 STEEL 459843 405900 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 618.24 6410 5/10/2018 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 172.71 TISSUE, PAPER TOWELS 459582 14210 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 385.54 FOAMY CLEANER, SOAP, LINERS 459582 14210 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 558.25 6411 5/10/2018 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. 4,806.00 2001 PUMP REPAIR 459634 0064959-IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 4,806.00 6412 5/10/2018 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 3,668.53 REPLACE VALVE IN WEST 459862 73759 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,668.53 6413 5/10/2018 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 57.62 BUSINESS CARDS FOR ADAM L. 459751 99843 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.62 6414 5/10/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 16.73 VACUUM REPAIR 459822 S3595334.001 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 324.69 ST. 1 BOILER REPAIR 459839 S3596468.001 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 341.42 6415 5/10/2018 101015 STREICHERS 3,179.40 10 CASES 9MM DUTY AMMO 459622 11312423 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,179.40 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 - Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6415 6416 5/10/2018 5/10/2018 101015 STREICHERS 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Continued... 93.50 GUARDS 457948 337307 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.03 MIRROR 458348 338674 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,617.60 459849 738343 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.00- CREDIT MEMO 459774 CM329864 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.20- CREDIT MEMO 458097 CM335212 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 76.18- CREDIT MEMO 458127 CM335340 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,563.75 6417 5/10/2018 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 540.80 GENERATOR 459820 E105883 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,781.11 CONTRACTED REPAIR 459844 EW08672 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.59 BELT 459771 0144787 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 594.33 GENERATOR 459648 0144792 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,983.83 6418 5/10/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 182.50 459695 0206031 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 487.50 459694 0206032 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 670.00 6419 5/10/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,276.19 459629 70107 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,276.19 424359 5/10/2018 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 236.00 459628 E-6073 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 236.00 424360 5/10/2018 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 26.48 TOM S OFFICE 459650 660204 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 26.48 424361 5/10/2018 129458 ACME TOOLS 166.61 CORDLESS RATCHET KIT 459645 5705796 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 166.61 424362 5/10/2018 132835 ADCOCK, MARIAN 2.37 ARTWORK SOLD 459864 050818 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424362 424363 5/10/2018 132835 ADCOCK, MARIAN 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Continued-. 5/10/2018 2.37 325.80 3 FIRST AID KITS 459873 193R-PYP3-V3N7 5710.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 119.97 WIRELESS MICE FOR PATROL ROOM 459680 1DXK-7W39-FHQD 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 63.80 DOOR HINGES 459871 1LYG-FJ9G-H9WG 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 163.76 TP/KLEENEX/SUPPLIES 459625 1LYG-FJ9G-LLLH 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 96.19 COFEEE SUPPLIES 459819 1QYD-TYMY-Y1 KD 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5.32 ASPIRIN 459624 1RH3-H4DF-G1NK 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 64.97 POPCORN 459630 1RH3-H4DF-LGJ6 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 11.99 MOUSE FOR SKARTAK 459686 1RH3-H4DF-PR4C 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 51.16 POLO SHIRTS 459813 1V39-13TQ-4RYN 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 31.96 SHOULDER STRAPS FOR PCR'S 459635 1WPW-HNCT-F1MC 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 934.92 424364 5/10/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 140.10 459700 1004120928 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 103.67 459701 1004120939 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 267.97 459730 1004125799 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 194.79 LAUNDRY 459758 1004129144 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 706.53 424365 5/10/2018 134182 ANGELICA, MARION 72.00 ARTWORK SOLD 459876 050818 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 72.00 424366 5/10/2018 135988 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. 876.15 APPRIZE MAY INVOICE 459875 16110 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 876.15 424367 5/10/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 2,322.50 459681 3259311 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 28.00- 459721 420951 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 36.90- 459720 420971 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,257.60 424368 5/10/2018 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 182.93 RUBBISH REMOVAL 459763 1-1463540501201 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 8 182.93 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page - 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 — Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424368 424369 5/10/2018 5/10/2018 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 102195 BATTERIES PLUS Continued... 863.84 BACKUP BATTERIES FOR 8 LIFTS 459760 P1039197 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 297.90 BACKUP BATTERIES FOR 72ND LIFT 459759 P1039242 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,161.74 424370 5/10/2018 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,747.50 SNOW REMOVAL 459652 150141 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 744.43 SPRING PREP 459716 150265 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 2,491.93 424371 5/10/2018 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 234.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 459796 4751914 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 234.00 424372 5/10/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 1,204.10 459626 423263 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,204.10 424373 5/10/2018 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 31.16 PLIERS AND DRIVER 459726 5418 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 31.16 424374 5/10/2018 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 29.99 UNIFORM SHORTS 459805 050718DB 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 29.99 424375 5/10/2018 122248 BLICK ART MATERIALS 24.51 SUPPLIES 459570 215774 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 10.16 CRAFT SUPPLIES 459571 216159 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 34.67 424376 5/10/2018 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,071.12 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 459606 82851764 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 570.38 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 459757 OZO<4053 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,641.50 424377 5/10/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 11.62 HOSE ELBOW 459644 1222983X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11.79 BRAKE VALVE, PIN 459643 1223185X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 — Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424377 424378 5/10/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 5/10/2018 23.41 1,048.66 459568 1080794485 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.64 459566 1080794486 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,408.23 459565 1080794487 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 31.15 459569 1080794488 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,934.85 459594 1080794489 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,607.74 459597 1080794490 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.64 459600 1080794491 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 120.84- 459655 2080199525 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,935.07 424379 5/10/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 10,440.10 459697 1090851159 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,310.40 459860 1090854298 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14,750.50 424380 5/10/2018 104481 BREDE EXPOSITION SERVICES 2,035.00 SKATE SHOW CURTIN 459802 983863 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 2,035.00 424381 5/10/2018 137691 BY THE YARD INC. 55.00 CHAIR REPAIR 459677 111079 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 55.00 424382 5/10/2018 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 122.40 MERCHANDISE 459740 929045167 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,440.20 MERCHANDISE 459741 929057498 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,562.60 424383 5/10/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3,050.55 459585 2090990 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 176.70 459586 2098991 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.20- 459596 2099093 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 180.00 459794 2101456 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.55 459859 2102143 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,711.40 459859 2102143 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,128.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page- 8 Business Unit 424384 5/10/2018 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 57.89 459788 8000014561-4/18 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 213.45 459788 8000014561-4/18 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 686.39 459788 8000014561-4/18 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 939.29 459788 8000014561-4/18 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 2,559.44 459788 8000014561-4/18 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 833.11 459788 8000014561-4/18 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 256.81 459788 8000014561-4/18 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 829.63 459788 8000014561-4/18 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 5,846.99 459788 8000014561-4/18 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,013.75 459788 8000014561-4/18 5761.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 58.40 459788 8000014561-4/18 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 216.11 459788 8000014561-4/18 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 292.08 459788 8000014561-4/18 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 538.61 459788 8000014561-4/18 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 762.11 459788 8000014561-4/18 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 2,064.91 459788 8000014561-4/18 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 17,168.97 424385 5/10/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 63.32 459792 0297-4/18 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 449.62 459838 8861-4/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 512.94 424386 5/10/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 309.87 MARCH LINENS 459734 4004188387 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 199.11 LINENS 459733 4005429687 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 20.88 RUG SERVICE 459633 4005505261 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 14.44 UNIFORM RENTAL 459689 4005541699 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 34.60 LAUNDRY 459691 4005541709 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.92 UNIFORM RENTAL 459690 4005541712 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 45.97 RENTAL UNIFORM 459687 4005541736 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 37.84 UNIFORM RENTAL 459688 4005541774 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 682.63 424387 5/10/2018 103235 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 422.05 BORDER BATTLE EXPENSES 459735 5118 1556.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 422.05 424388 5/10/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 470.81 SEWER/STORMWATER 459623 0120835016/4-20 5111.6189 SEWER & WATER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page - 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 — Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424388 5/10/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES Continued-. 18 470.81 424389 5/10/2018 120433 COMCAST 105.18 CABLE 459746 0177449-4/18 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 105.18 424390 5/10/2018 120433 COMCAST 20.35 CABLE TV 459832 0161120-4/18 5511.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 20.35 424391 5/10/2018 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 1,116.15 CLAY 459572 INV000125044 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,116.15 424392 5/10/2018 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 70.70 WATER COOLER 459653 114X65617405 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 14.35 WATER 459738 114X65768802 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 85.05 424393 5/10/2018 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 3,197.50 SCADA PROGRAMMING 459845 10825 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 4,136.00 WTP 2 EMERGENCY REPAIRS 459846 10826 05571.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WTP Emergency Repairs 7,333.50 424394 5/10/2018 100130 DAKOTA COUNTY 200.00 DAKOTA COUNTY WARRANT 459808 20180507KK 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 424395 5/10/2018 142401 DAWSON, ROSALYN 3.01 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 459809 050418 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 40.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 459809 050418 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 43.01 424396 5/10/2018 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC. 349.50 REMOTE START INSTALL 459642 1-104133 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 349.50 REMOTE START INSTALL 459641 1-104134 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 699.00 424397 5/10/2018 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page- 10 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424397 5/10/2018 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. Continued... 377.20 SIGN POST STABILIZER 459707 0117193-IN 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 377.20 424398 5/10/2018 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 1,111.96 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 459868 1978152 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 186.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 459866 1978528 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 474.70 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 459867 1978689 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 849.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 459869 1980994 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,621.76 424399 5/10/2018 142397 ESPOSITO, ROBERT 35.37 REFUND 459620 122881 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 35.37 424400 5/10/2018 142392 ESTATE OF ARNOLD HYMANSON 28.82 REFUND 459615 84273 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 28.82 424401 5/10/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 527.20 DEF FLUID 459764 1-5565521 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.20 GARB CLEANER 459639 69-308559 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 76.59 BATTERY 459748 69-308920 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.94 WIPER BLADES 459772 69-309624 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 664.93 424402 5/10/2018 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,809.00 LESSONS 4/18-5/2/18 459710 5418 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,809.00 424403 5/10/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,779.36 METERS 459847 0278292-1 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 303.64 METER PARTS 459667 0278293-1 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 2,083.00 424404 5/10/2018 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 342.58 MERCHANIDSE 459739 6256309 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 342.58 424405 5/10/2018 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 82.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIALS SHIRTS 459856 94149 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page- 11 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 - Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424405 424406 5/10/2018 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC. Continued... 5/10/2018 82.50 793.20 APRIL TIX 459753 8040344 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 793.20 424407 5/10/2018 101103 GRAINGER 1,014.53 LIGHTS FOR THEATER 459581 9770074129 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 35.71 FR ANTI-SLIP TAPE 459583 9772927167 5330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FLOWRIDER 161.50 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 459728 9773173183 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 67.24 HOUR METERS 459664 9773684049 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 67.90- RETURN 459661 9773684056 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 833.20 BALLASTS - LIGHTING 459699 9776625601 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 113.04 TIRE INFLATOR 459708 9777162828 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,157.32 424408 5/10/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,078.00 459580 MN00038852 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 363.50 459598 MN00038872 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,441.50 424409 5/10/2018 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 1,476.00 LESSONS 4/18-5/2/18 459709 5418 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,476.00 424410 5/10/2018 142390 GRUBER, CHRISTOPHER 120.00 REFUND 459613 122191 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 120.00 424411 5/10/2018 142402 HAMMER, DEBRA LYNN 500.56 REFUND 459825 342363007 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 500.56 424412 5/10/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 169.00 MAY BUNDLED SERVICES 459827 1000110219 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 169.00 424413 5/10/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 804.00 APRIL BOOKINGS 459828 1000110098 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 804.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 — Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424413 424414 5/10/2018 5/10/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. Continued_ 55.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 459675 52917302 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 55.00 424415 5/10/2018 116680 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY 616.84 EQUIP REPL PC 459679 59890601 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 616.84 PC FOR ARENA CONFROOM 459679 59890601 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 1,233.68 424416 5/10/2018 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 366.50 REPAIR ALL CLEAN MACHINE 459870 700324932 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 366.50 424417 5/10/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,574.00 459587 959231A 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,569.00 459590 960732 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 30.00 459858 962167 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,173.00 424418 5/10/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 88.65 FILTERS 459640 038042983 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 324.10 COMPRESSOR 459773 038043307 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.26 FILTER 459747 038043593 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.48 FILTERS 459775 038043662 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 428.49 424419 5/10/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 2,348.00 459631 63431 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,348.00 424420 5/10/2018 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 132.35 SILICONE SEALANT, PAINT, BLEAC 459637 4/18-EQUIPMENT 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN OPERATIONS 867.23 JERRYS 459717 4/18-PARKS 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE 999.58 424421 5/10/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,027.60 459575 2809093 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page - 13 Business Unit 424421 5/10/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 173.60 BEER 459718 2838863 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,201.20 424422 5/10/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 586.02 459670 5998934 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 516.60 459669 5998935 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 544.76 459668 5998936 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,130.90 459674 5998938 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.19 459666 5998939 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 195.18 459665 5998940 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,638.96 459663 5998942 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,637.61 424423 5/10/2018 120296 KAASA, GUNNAR 45.98 UNIFORM 2018 459693 050318GK 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.98 UNIFORM PANTS 459804 050718GK 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.96 424424 5/10/2018 100845 KREMER SERVICES LLC 579.19 CONTRACTED REPAIR 459749 55623 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 579.19 424425 5/10/2018 142393 KROSSCHELL, NATHAN 40.04 REFUND 459616 117436 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 40.04 424426 5/10/2018 142394 LAUKKA, MICHAEL 209.19 REFUND 459617 109083 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 209.19 424427 5/10/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 233.90 BOLTS, SCREWS, FITTINGS 459646 9305779694 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 233.90 424428 5/10/2018 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 20,757.40 APRIL ATTY FEES 459874 0656.001-4/18 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 20,757.40 424429 5/10/2018 142391 LOUGH, WILLIAM 26.45 REFUND 459614 81561 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page - 14 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 — Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424429 424430 5/10/2018 5/10/2018 142391 LOUGH, WILLIAM 139469 LUBE TECH LIQUID RECYCLING Continued... 26.45 100.00 RECYCLE USED OIL 459769 1153955 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 424431 5/10/2018 122878 MART]], DOROTHEA 371.25 "AGENDA: EDINA" HOSTING FEE 459750 #238 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 371.25 424432 5/10/2018 137819 MCCONNACH, COREY 43.60 MILEAGE 459817 05032018.1 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENAADMINISTRATION 43.60 424433 5/10/2018 142396 MCNAUGHT, DONALD 120.00 REFUND 459619 87940 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 120.00 424434 5/10/2018 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 105,786.45 APRIL SAC CHARGES 459722 042018 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 105786.45 424435 5/10/2018 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERV 441,406.31 JUNE SERVICE 459696 0001082933 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 441,406.31 424436 5/10/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 179.84 PROGRAM NEW KEY 459638 331634 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 353.68 LAMP ASSY 459768 507960 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 533.52 424437 5/10/2018 102769 MILLER, TOM 2,155.50 LESSONS 4/18-5/2/18 459713 5418 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 2,155.50 424438 5/10/2018 103942 MINN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION BOARD 25.00 459755 5456 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 424439 5/10/2018 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page - 15 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424439 5/10/2018 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY Continued... 50.40 CO2, METHAIR GASSES 459833 00025582 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 50.40 424440 5/10/2018 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC 100.00 GM ART CENTER POSTING 459824 9470 1170.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL HUMAN RESOURCES 100.00 424441 5/10/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 182.25 459673 5656 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 182.25 424442 5/10/2018 101796 MPCA 45.00 S-B LICENSE FEE 459865 5082018 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 45.00 424443 5/10/2018 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 112.00 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS. ADVERT. 459632 N10379878 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 112.00 424444 5/10/2018 132509 NOLAN, MARK 350.29 EXPENSE REPORT 459604 050218 1262.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TRANSPORTATION 350.29 424445 5/10/2018 142398 NORTH LAKES CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1,350.00 WEST ARENA GUTTERS 459800 04-25-2018 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,350.00 424446 5/10/2018 142201 NORTHWEST LIGHTING SYSTEMS CO. 551.36 459704 107105 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 66.00 PW BUILDING LAMPS 459857 107142 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 290.00 COURTNEY FIELD LAMPS 459857 107142 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 907.36 424447 5/10/2018 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 27.70 459785 W18030557 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 27.70 459785 W18030557 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 55.40 459785 W18030557 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 83.10 459785 W18030557 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 83.22 459785 W18030557 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 193.90 459785 W18030557 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page - 16 Business Unit 424447 5/10/2018 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES Continued... 304.70 459785 W18030557 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 55.40 459785 W18030557 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 27.70 459785 W18030557 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 110.80 459785 W18030557 5410.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 124.65 459785 W18030557 5710.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 124.65 459785 W18030557 5760.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 55.40 459785 W18030557 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 83.10 459785 W18030557 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 83.10 459785 W18030557 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 55.40 459785 W18030557 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 291.28 459786 W18030562 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1787.20 424448 5/10/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 271.50 ROPE FOR THE ZIP LINE 459872 618767 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 271.50 424449 5/10/2018 101659 ORKIN 135.20 PW PEST CONTROL 459731 170171441 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 135.20 424450 5/10/2018 136189 P&W GOLF SUPPLY LLC 327.29 GOLF BALLS 459815 INV33455 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 327.29 424451 5/10/2018 142395 PAMPUSCH, POLLY 20.56 REFUND 459618 118079 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 20.56 424452 5/10/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 636.85 459591 9633 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 88.25 459588 9634 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 408.70 459576 9645 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,133.80 424453 5/10/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 246.03 459791 29356208 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 224.00 459790 32468610 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 940.61- 459830 32562806 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 379.56 CONCESSIONS FOOD 459676 50892566 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page - 17 Business Unit 424453 5/10/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY Continued... 392.28 PEPSI PRODUCT W 459855 52086166 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 338.11 PEPSI 459736 53445002 5420.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CLUB HOUSE 761.69 459789 65021168 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 24.17- 459829 84751066 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 12.03 459836 LF170317156462 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 14.30 459835 LF170518178168 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 3.36 459834 LF170918227645 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 11.43 459837 LF180418305048 1280.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 1,418.01 424454 5/10/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2,035.69 459662 2350598 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 115.38 459657 2350599 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,321.72 459656 2350600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 33.19- 459685 293183 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,439.60 424455 5/10/2018 106152 POWERPLAN 5,900.00 BACKHOE RENTAL OVER WINTER 459854 R21803 5913.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL DISTRIBUTION 757.52 DAMAGE REPAIRS ON RENTAL 459654 W44175 5913.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL DISTRIBUTION 6,657.52 424456 5/10/2018 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 124.86 NE PW OFFICE PAINT 459567 985103095304 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 124.86 424457 5/10/2018 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 950.00 459636 IN200-1016708 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 950.00 424458 5/10/2018 131064 PRECISION PRINTING INC. 552.00 PLAYERS CARDS 459742 3118 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 552.00 424459 5/10/2018 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 120.00 SHARPEN ZAM BLADES 459799 282280 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 120.00 424460 5/10/2018 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 114.00 HOIST RELAY 459776 28912-1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOG1S101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 - Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424460 424461 5/10/2018 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 139392 Q-FREE TCS INC. Continued... 5/10/2018 114.00 320.00 WAYFIND COMMUNICATION SUPPORT 459698 11805 4090.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 320.00 424462 5/10/2018 135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT 921.36 TUBE ASSY AND WHEEL 459765 138664 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 921.36 424463 5/10/2018 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 300.44 MAT TEES 459737 87380 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 300.44 424464 5/10/2018 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 206.00 459863 K-35335086 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 206.00 424465 5/10/2018 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 208.48 JACK, DRAWBAR GAUGE 459154 1927980196 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 320.42- CREDIT MEMO 459194 1927980586 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 143.68 JACK MOUNTS 459767 1927985383 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.74 424466 5/10/2018 129562 RISCHMILLER, KEITH 43.00 LICENSE FEE 459823 05072018 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 43.00 424467 5/10/2018 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. 109.90 459732 IND016051 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 109.90 424468 5/10/2018 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 320.00 SCOTT COUNTY WARRANT 459807 20180507CL 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 320.00 424469 5/10/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 1,631.26 NORTH RAMP WAYFINDING 459608 12850 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 68.00 459702 12870 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 68.00 459702 12870 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page - 19 Business Unit 424469 5/10/2018 120784 SIGN PRO Continued... 68.00 459702 12870 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 232.00 NORTH RAMP EXP CONSTR SIGNS 459826 12892 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 2,067.26 424470 5/10/2018 140828 SISK, MINDY 34.00 ARTWORK REIMBURSEMENT 459831 050718 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 34.00 424471 5/10/2018 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 89.78 GOLF COURSE ROPE 459727 85356194 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 574.05 TIM FERTILIZER 459715 85558095 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 663.83 424472 5/10/2018 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 89.46 PLIERS SET 459766 ARV/35960397 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 89.46 424473 5/10/2018 129587 SOLBERG, DAVID 195.49 SAFETY BOOTS 2018 459692 050318DS 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 195.49 424474 5/10/2018 142399 SONTERRE, CHRIS 11.60 EDGER PLUG 459818 05032018 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 11.60 424475 5/10/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 145.00 459578 1677590 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 993.08 459577 1677591 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,021.20 459621 1677592 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,326.80 459579 1677593 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.40 459601 1677594 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 607.33 459593 1677595 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,059.49 459592 1677596 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,226.80 459589 1677597 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,533.40 459595 1677598 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,881.60 459719 1678931 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 161.60 459599 5029681 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16,958.70 424476 5/10/2018 141066 SOUTHWEST LAWN & SNOW R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page - 20 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424476 5/10/2018 141066 SOUTHWEST LAWN & SNOW Continued... 1,260.00 LAWN SERVICE 459801 971 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,260.00 424477 5/10/2018 105152 SPAIN, MARK - PW 19.00 DMV CLASS A UPGRADE 459778 05032018MS 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 134.97 CLOTHING 459714 05-04-2018 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 153.97 424478 5/10/2018 130091 SPARTINA 449 LLC 130.92 MERCHANDISE 459745 IN69648 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 130.92 424479 5/10/2018 129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SOLUTIONS 416.40 STA. 2 ALARM REPAIRS 459754 15535332 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 416.40 424480 5/10/2018 123359 STAUNTON, KEVIN 148.14 NLC CONFERENCE 459787 04/04/2018 NLC 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL CONE 148.14 424481 5/10/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 185.00 459627 21237 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 185.00 424482 5/10/2018 104932 TAYLOR MADE 301.19 MERCHANDISE 459744 33162564 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 861.77 MECHANDISE 459743 33162881 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,162.96 424483 5/10/2018 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 47.42- CREDIT ON TANKS 457163 10167808 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 215.79 WELDING GAS 459821 10242051 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.11 PW INVOICE, APPLY CREDIT 457164 40080158 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 65.15 WELDING GAS 459649 40081631 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 266.63 424484 5/10/2018 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 123.25 APRIL USAGE 459611 269634/4-2018 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 123.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/10/2018 - Inv No 5/10/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424484 424485 5/10/2018 5/10/2018 131040 TRANS UNION RISK AND ALTERNATIVE 139818 US HEALTHWORKS Continued... 115.00 459842 008375-MN 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 320.00 459603 0083833-MN 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 270.00 459806 0084120-MN 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 705.00 424486 5/10/2018 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 308.22 GOLF CART TOW BAR 459724 3306 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 308.22 424487 5/10/2018 141927 VER-TECH LABS 895.74 NOZZLES FOR TRUCK WASH 459647 INV000015396 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 895.74 424488 5/10/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 61.96 459729 7792579-2282-2 1646.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 61.96 424489 5/10/2018 130574 WATSON COMPANY 459.09 CONCESSIONS FOOD 459795 887193 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 459.09 424490 5/10/2018 131648 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. 4,718.80 7250 TRAFFIC STUDY 459812 11802283 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 4,718.80 424491 5/10/2018 129756 WINDSTAR PROMOTIONS 84.73 459703 3892 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 84.74 459703 3892 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 84.74 459703 3892 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 254.21 424492 5/10/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 20.94 459660 7181638 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,217.66 459659 7181640 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,363.14 459658 7181642 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,601.74 424493 5/10/2018 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/10/2018 — 5/10/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/9/2018 11:24:26 Page- 22 Business Unit 424493 5/10/2018 124503 WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued... 10.73 CLAMPS FOR MECH LIGHTS 459651 159026 00 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 10.73 424494 5/10/2018 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 3,780.00 VALLEY VIEW SIDEWALK 459602 R-010516-000-7 2501.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PACS IS 23,538.50 69TH ST MALL ENTRANCE 459610 R-010823-000-7 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,166.25 PARKING STUDY 459810 R-011664-000-1 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 30,484.75 424495 5/10/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 52.91 459781 589109527 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 101.83 459782 589175021 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 14.19 459783 589180742 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 6,840.02 459784 589845597 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 21,274.31 459793 590003261 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,388.75 459793 590003261 5553.6185 LIGHT & POWER SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 23,340.76 459780 590186468 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 56,012.77 424496 5/10/2018 104324 YOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO. 87.20 FORMICA 459705 00031526-001 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 87.20 424497 5/10/2018 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 95.20 SAFETY 459762 54065297 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 95.20 901,343.18 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 823,033.76 78,309.42 901,343.18 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2018 11:24:32 Council Check Summary Page - 1 5/10/2018 - 5/10/2018 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 185,200.57 02500 PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 3,780.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 9,938.84 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 8,290.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,060.75 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 260.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 599.71- 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 16,006.42 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 43,193.65 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 4,597.55 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 2,699.56 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 1,427.21 05800 LIQUOR FUND 80,206.83 05900 UTILITY FUND 487,362.31 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,812.69 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 53,106.51 Report Totals 901,343.18 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page- 1 Business Unit 6420 5/17/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 58.74 460028 02209789 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 201.95 459997 2230813 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 100.20 459910 2230817 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 186.74 460247 2232531 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 253.18 460594 2232534 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 95.96 460066 2233229 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 46.35 460266 2233822 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 943.12 6421 5/17/2018 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 553.72 COFFEE-CITY HALL 460735 1320941 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 553.72 6422 5/17/2018 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 688.00 EMP LAW-ATTORNEY 460673 187443 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 688.00 6423 5/17/2018 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 389.00 TIE NEW NET 459925 1013042 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 345.82 GOAL NET SUPPLIES 459926 1013043 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 734.82 6424 5/17/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,089.45 460346 63897300 , 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 280.65 460069 63976300 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 89.55 459906 63976500 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 255.10 459995 64024300 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,810.05 460078 64024400 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,783.15 459908 64026500 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 268.65 460623 64058600 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 268.65 460276 64058700 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,361.48 460613 64119900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,302.68 460282 64120000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,074.40 460181 64120100 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 42.50 459911 97550100 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 203.62 459911 97550100 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 277.52 460065 97550300 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13.56 460654 97586700 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 133.31 460281 97586800 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20,254.32 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 2 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 - Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6424 6425 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS Continued... 198.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES 460534 139029 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 198.98 6426 5/17/2018 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 2,253.89 TURBO GP, SEALS, GASKETS 460770 1226150 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,253.89 6427 5/17/2018 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 9,912.05 5146 EDEN - REDEV PLANNING 460708 B127624 9232.6133 PROFESS SERVICES-ENGINEERING CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 6,592.77 NORTH RAMP EXP - SOIL TEST 460709 B127857 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 16,504.82 6428 5/17/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 432.89 FOLDERS/CLIPS/ 460736 OE-480292-1 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 134.89 PAPER, CC RECEIPT ROLLS 460372 WO-381658-1 5310.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 45.40 PAPER 460372 WO-381658-1 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 613.18 6429 5/17/2018 116114 CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. 813.01 CANON PRINTING SUPLIES 460407 902701519 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 112.94 OCE MAINTENANCE 460717 989028002 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 925.95 6430 5/17/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 356.00 460326 104-0335 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 245.00 460345 67-3931 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 965.00 460055 67-3951 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 386.00 460340 67-3952 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 90.00 460277 985 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,042.00 6431 5/17/2018 104020 DALCO 92.88 COURTNEY FIELDS GLASS CLEANER 460366 3315142 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 137.72 PW CLEAN ING SUPP LIES 460689 3316228 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 230.60 6432 5/17/2018 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC 452.64 CARMEL CORN 460099 2411 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page- 3 Business Unit 6432 5/17/2018 129718 DREW'S CONCESSIONS LLC Continued... 144.00 CARMEL CORN 460099 2411 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 596.64 6433 5/17/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 59.50 PUBLISH PC PUB HRN NOTICE 4/25 460682 589653 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 77.35 PUBLISH PC PUB HRN NOTICE 5/9 460684 593613 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 166.60 AFB FRANCE AV SIDEWALK 460687 595811 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 154.70 AFB VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK 460688 595812 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 458.15 6434 5/17/2018 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 178.38 AFB VALLEY VIEW RD SIDEWALK 460690 743771589 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 185.65 AFB FRANCE AVE SIDEWALK 460692 743771590 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 364.03 6435 5/17/2018 100858 LOGIS 721.00 460587 45257 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,734.00 460587 45257 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,961.00 460587 45257 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 4,502.00 460587 45257 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,045.00 460587 45257 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 6,961.00 460587 45257 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 7,269.00 460587 45257 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 7,027.00 460587 45257 5902.6160 DATA PROCESSING UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 2,790.00 IT CONSULTING 460565 45316 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 39,010.00 6436 5/17/2018 101483 MENARDS 50.78 COPPER PIPE, COUPLING 460412 67432 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 136.55 FILTER, BROOM, TOILET CLEANER 460411 67439 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 35.11 LUMBER 460151 67510 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 55.71 STA. 1 BOILER REPAIR 459932 67533 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11.72 DRAIN CLEANER 459924 67556 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 19.96 NAILS PAMELA 460155 67651 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 229.22 DOME SUPPLIES 460576 67730 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 51.59 DRILL BIT/ PAINT SUPPLIES 460730 67736 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 38.44 EAST SUPPLIES 460578 67812 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 11.18 CONE RM TVANCHORS 460577 67815 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 98.32 CEDAR BOARDS 460728 67829 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 156.62 TOOLS 460727 67851 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 4 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 - Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6436 5/17/2018 101483 MENARDS Continued... 16.20 PAINTING SUPPLIES 460731 68156 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 148.88 AC2 GREEN TREATED 460733 68160 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 33.17 CONCRETE PATCH MIX 460732 68164 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,093.45 6437 5/17/2018 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 49.85 460718 40691 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 106.75 460718 40691 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 119.20 460718 40691 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 513.85 460718 40691 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 789.65 6438 5/17/2018 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 780.00 HVAC CONTRACT 460554 77819 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 780.00 6439 5/17/2018 129485 PAPCO INC. 115.77 CLEANING SUPPLIES 460102 206913 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 115.77 6440 5/17/2018 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 725.10 TIRE SERVICE 460083 210344614 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 725.10 6441 5/17/2018 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 208.16 BDAY PLATES 9" 460100 14287 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 568.23 CLEANING SUPPLIES 460582 14291 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 29.91 CL 460582 14291 5553.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 121.54 CLEANING SUPPLIES 460581 14299 5520.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA CONCESSIONS 462.91 CLEANING SUPPLIES 460581 14299 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 24.36 CLEANING SUPPLIES 460581 14299 5553.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 1,415.11 6442 5/17/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 227.43 METER PLUMBING 460087 S3597967.001 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 227.43 6443 5/17/2018 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 435.84 JAC PARTS 460153 E105902 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 986.76 CONTRACTED REPAIR 460536 EW08708 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page- 5 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6443 5/17/2018 118190 TURFWERKS LLC Continued... 594.33- CREDIT MEMO 460545 0001404 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 828.27 6444 5/17/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 304.75 460070 0206039 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 298.50 460317 0206509 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 746.00 460316 0206510 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 160.75 460315 0206511 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 626.75 460167 0206537 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.25 460166 0206538 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 121.50 460343 205503 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.00 459895 206033 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 487.50 459894 206034 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 127.50 459893 206035 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 33.25 460595 206516 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 105.25 460596 206521 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,386.00 6445 5/17/2018 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 959.22 CONCESSIONS FOOD 460163 51675305 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 8.03- RAMON RETURN 460165 51706881 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 485.96 CONCESSIONS FOOD 460674 51734244 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,437.15 6446 5/17/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,504.18 460631 70109 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 424.80 460050 70124 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,211.55 460012 70797 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 668.25 460642 70800 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 898.85 460331 70818 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,707.63 424498 5/17/2018 142327 56 BREWING, LLC 216.00 459900 5602280 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 154.00 460324 5602299 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 370.00 424499 5/17/2018 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 105.80 460714 208562-001 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 105.80 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 - Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424499 424500 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER LLC 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY Continued... 293.00 459998 E-6074 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.00 459915 E-6075 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 234.00 460645 E-6145 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 673.00 424501 5/17/2018 129458 ACME TOOLS 831.00 460711 5724888 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 915.93 460712 5733971 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 1,746.93 424502 5/17/2018 135922 ACUSHNET COMPANY 759.25 MERCHANDISE 460551 905760572 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 86.24 MERCHANDISE 460549 905779746 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 57.18 MERCHANDISE 460550 905781707 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 96.48 MERCHANDISE 460547 905788973 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,566.82 MERCHANDISE 460573 905803645 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 70.73 MERCHANDISE 460574 905804383 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 760.71 MERCHANDISE 460548 905804475 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 3,397.41 424503 5/17/2018 135313 AIR CLIMATE CONTROL INC. 403.68 ICE MACHINE SERVICE 460782 50397 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 403.68 424504 5/17/2018 142387 AIRSTAR AMERICA INC 1,382.37 460759 SR-INV-FL-01894 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 5 1,382.37 424505 5/17/2018 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS 236.00 APRIL ALERUS INVOICE 460771 C65763 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 236.00 424506 5/17/2018 141768 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC. 5.30 FITTING 460517 10942904 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.30 424507 5/17/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 7 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424507 5/17/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES Continued... 97.75 VALVE REPAIR KIT 460561 11D3-GW1F-QDC7 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 184.31 FLUSH VALVE 460555 17QK-COM1-3T4H 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 133.94 DISENFECTANT LIQUID EMS 460567 17QK-CQM1-6CTF 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 17.99 BOAT REPAIR PARTS 460558 17QK-CQM1-QXJ7 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 67.93 KICKBALL BALLS 460683 17QK-CQM1-TVTG 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 79.96 IT SUPPLIES 460400 199N-JIXG-QQRW 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 94.95 TRAINING LIT 460400 199N-J1XG-QQRW 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 7.99 CONFERENCE ROOM UPGRADE 460720 DTJ-P9R3-MTGQ 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 23.49 STA. 1 CONFERENCE ROOM POWER C 460569 1LNQ-G9TF-KCYD 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5.99 VOICE TUBE - E911 460737 1MGD-RXHH-RVVYD 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 226.06 DISENFECTANT WIPES EMS 460566 1NHT-XXRD-QR1X 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 45.84 BOAT REPAIR 460553 1WGX-7FYD-KXND 5761.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 60.91 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE STATION 460568 1WNK-C MW-93 L6 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.97 DIAPER BIN BAGS 460416 1XLQ-TYLL-C3VR 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 32.59 CONFERENCE ROOM UPGRADE 459933 1XRP-PFQ4-7PHT 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,109.67 424508 5/17/2018 108533 AMERICAN ACCOUNTS & ADVISERS 213.68 460729 74530 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 213.68 424509 5/17/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 141.71 LAUNDRY 460441 1004131531 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 157.52 460447 1004131535 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 141.60 460424 1004133980 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 154.07 LAUNDRY 460748 1004136169 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 594.90 424510 5/17/2018 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 193.00 ALARM TEST - TUPA 460112 211960 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 193.00 424511 5/17/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 264.00 460058 3259310 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,881.00 460056 3259312 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,719.10 460320 3261049/3261052 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,251.00 460168 3261050 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 186.70 460598 3261051 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,379.00 460599 3261053 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,188.50 460349 8267614 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424511 5/17/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY Continued... 2,492.00 459907 8269809 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 14,361.30 424512 5/17/2018 106304 ASPEN MILLS 189.00 OUTER VEST CARRIER 460361 215525 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 92.59 UNIFORMS 460753 216277 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 156.90 UNIFORMS 460752 216278 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 450.50 UNIFORMS 460751 216279 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 540.75 UNIFORMS 460750 216280 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,429.74 424513 5/17/2018 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON INC. 189.95 CONTRACTED REPAIR 460531 161313 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 189.95 424514 5/17/2018 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 40.80 ARTWORK SOLD 460064 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.80 424515 5/17/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 296.00 460397 303300 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,429.35 460034 423119 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,145.90 459921 423122 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 80.00 460298 424595 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,542.87 460294 424596 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.66 460601 424599 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,862.00 460602 424600 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,806.72 460182 424743 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11,179.50 424516 5/17/2018 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 444.16 CONCESSIONS FOOD 460162 557923 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 444.16 424517 5/17/2018 132641 BEST, KATIE 26.40 ARTWORK SOLD 460061 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.40 424518 5/17/2018 140365 BIKO ASSOCIATES INC. 8,832.00 COMP. PLAN 2018 460704 15-170105 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 — Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424518 5/17/2018 140365 BIKO ASSOCIATES INC. Continued... 4,772.50 COMP. PLAN 2018 460705 5-170505 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 13,604.50 424519 5/17/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 189.00 460283 2342 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 189.00 424520 5/17/2018 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 9,294.30 RETAINING WALL REPAIR 460746 1899-02A 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 9,294.30 424521 5/17/2018 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 2,873.26 RETAINING WALL REPAIR 460747 1899-028 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 2,873.26 424522 5/17/2018 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES, LLC 386.00 50TH FRANCE COMPACTOR 460370 MAY2018-3 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 386.00 424523 5/17/2018 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 75.06 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 460749 8286287 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 75.06 424524 5/17/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 478.00 460348 150365 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,561.17 460027 150546 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 442.48 459909 150596 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,663.50 459944 150691 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 706.00 460328 150696 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,208.50 460597 150754 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,059.65 424525 5/17/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 77.60 LAMP 460451 1221523X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 228.20 FILTER ASSY 460079 1227202 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.08- RETURNED PART 460453 CM1222542 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.77- RETURNED PART 460452 CM1222603 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 153.95 424526 5/17/2018 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page- 10 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424526 5/17/2018 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Continued-. 4,572.50 2018 GOLF LEAGUE PAYMENT 460107 20180508 1628.6103.02 GOLF PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 4,572.50 424527 5/17/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,267.95 460635 1080794392 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,525.50 460636 1080794393 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 92.04 460637 1080794484 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,072.12 460621 1080797653 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,051.89 460620 1080797684 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 828.49 459940 1080797685 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 355.32 459939 1080797686 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 140.55 460013 1080797687 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 681.61 460271 1080797688 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,687.04 460273 1080797690 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,951.49 460272 1080797691 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 17.44 460280 1080797692 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 129.95 460327 1080797693 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13,801.39 424528 5/17/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 2,502.80 460337 1090851158 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 492.00 460036 1090851936 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,529.10 460603 1090854296 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 127.75 460604 1090854297 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11,829.60 459938 1090854299 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 111.85 459877 1090854300 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23,593.10 424529 5/17/2018 142457 BULLARD, WHITNEY 10.50 TAX ON REFUND FOR OCT. 6 460355 CLP10618RF 5750.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE CENTENNIAL LAKES BALANCE SHEET 139.50 REFUND FOR OCT. 6 RENTAL 460355 CLP10618RF 5751.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES REVENUE 150.00 424530 5/17/2018 140494 C. VISION PRODUCTIONS LLC 50.00 TASTE OF EDINA CAMERA RENTAL 460706 135533 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 50.00 424531 5/17/2018 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 630.94 MERCHANDISE 460570 929076509 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 612.49 MERCHANDISE 460571 929076510 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 11 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424531 5/17/2018 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF Continued.. 618.42 MECHANDISE 460572 929076511 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 182.00 MERCHANDISE 460552 929091759 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 2,043.85 424532 5/17/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3,129.05 459919 2098992 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 44.70 460338 2098993 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 278.20 459920 2099082 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 240.00 460067 2101458 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 176.70 459878 2102142 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,441.20 459881 2102145 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 132.00 460652 2102146 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,253.55 460652 2102146 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12,695.40 424533 5/17/2018 134978 CATHERWOOD, JILL 21.00 ARTWORK SOLD 460057 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 21.00 424534 5/17/2018 103300 CENTER FOR ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 18,995.25 GRANDVIEW GREEN SUSTAIN STUDY 460776 15366 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 18,995.25 424535 5/17/2018 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 4,905.72 460584 6204072-5/18 5720.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 4,905.72 424536 5/17/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 47.19 460210 0146-4/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 57.96 460210 0146-4/18 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 58.09 460210 0146-4/18 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 58.09 460210 0146-4/18 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 60.22 460210 0146-4/18 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 60.22 460210 0146-4/18 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 60.22 460210 0146-4/18 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 65.60 460210 0146-4/18 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 262.45 460210 0146-4/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 60.22 460210 0146-4/18 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 351.73 460210 0146-4/18 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 60.22 460210 0146-4/18 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 12 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 - Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424536 5/17/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 39.55 460210 0146-4/18 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 591.40 460214 0426-5/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 95.48 460211 1019-4/18 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 62.05 460322 1161-5/18 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 164.65 460586 2951-5/18 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 221.13 460321 6661-5/18 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 591.40 460213 6797-5/18 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 118.73 460212 7398-4/18 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 3,086.60 424537 5/17/2018 141062 CHAMP VA 94.74 AMB REF 46429133 460788 51518 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 94.74 424538 5/17/2018 100683 CHEMSEARCH 657.77 WATER TREATMENT PROGRAM 460676 3123299 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 657.77 424539 5/17/2018 104283 CHISAGO COUNTY 200.00 CHISAGO COUNTY WARRANT 460742 20180514TP 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 424540 5/17/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 37.84 RENTAL UNIFORM 460393 4005722511 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.26 LAUNDRY 460420 4005722539 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 38.30 RENTAL UNIFORM 460419 4005722547 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 11.78 UNIFORM RENTAL 460392 4005722575 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.92 UNIFORM RENTAL 460421 4005722576 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 144.10 424541 5/17/2018 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 PHONE, NETWORK 460103 COM-1549 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 424542 5/17/2018 140274 CIVICPLUS 300.00 ADD CALENDAR TEMPLATE WEBSITE 460024 171782 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 300.00 424543 5/17/2018 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 540.68 460296 3641205932 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 5/17/2018 — Doc No Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424543 5/17/2018 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 120433 COMCAST Continued... 424544 5/17/2018 540.68 24.83 CABLE TV 460562 23973-5/18 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 24.83 424545 5/17/2018 120433 COMCAST 86.02 RAMP INTERNET 460719 0540232-5/18 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 86.02 424546 5/17/2018 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 3,481.23 460758 180430 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,481.23 424547 5/17/2018 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 49.62 PATCHING CEMENT 460121 0168637-IN 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 648.00 DETECTABLE WARNING PLATES 460726 0168897-IN 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 697.62 424548 5/17/2018 100012 CORE & MAIN 119.78 HYDRANT WRENCHES 460086 1830127 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 119.78 424549 5/17/2018 136899 CORRIGAN, KAT 6.00 ARTWORK SOLD 460053 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.00 424550 5/17/2018 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 2,209.11 UNIFORMS 460409 60452 5761.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 2,209.11 424551 5/17/2018 123653 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE & BRICK PAVING INC. 3,482.00 PAVER REPAIRS 460557 05042018 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,482.00 424552 5/17/2018 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 405.25 BOTTLED WATER SUPPLY 460113 114-10014090-3/ 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5-2018 405.25 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 — 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page- 14 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424553 5/17/2018 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE Continued... 2.40 ARTWORK SOLD 460043 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.40 424554 5/17/2018 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 15.60 ARTWORK SOLD 460017 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.60 424555 5/17/2018 129884 DEARBORN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. 2,853.10 MAY STD INVOICE 460773 F018342-4/18 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 2,853.10 424556 5/17/2018 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 10,615.30 APRIL SURCHARGE 2018 459991 042018 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 10,615.30 424557 5/17/2018 123995 DICK'S/LAKEVILLE SANITATION INC. 1,909.90 460215 DT0002166935 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,909.90 424558 5/17/2018 101766 DISPLAY SALES 1,960.00 FLAGS 460563 INV-015111 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 1,960.00 424559 5/17/2018 123942 DODGE OF BURNSVILLE INC. 24,740.00 NEW UNMARKED VEHICLE 460791 N29092 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 24,720.00 NEW UNMARKED VEHICLE 460792 N29106 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 49,460.00 424560 5/17/2018 129079 DRAIN KING INC. 1,250.00 PWFLOOR DRAIN LINE CLEAN 460762 WO 2572 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,250.00 424561 5/17/2018 140431 EARTH NETWORKS INC. 1,500.00 WEATHER STATION ANNUAL FEE 460781 WBB0035944 5422.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,500.00 424562 5/17/2018 140559 EDEN COMPANY, THE 7,500.00 GRANDVIEW GREEN COORD/HRA 459960 12 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 7,500.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 15 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424563 5/17/2018 122079 EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES Continued-. 169.00 SOCCER SHOTS GYM SPACE 460157 1718-4033 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP 169.00 SOCCER SHOTS GYM SPACE 460158 1718-4187 1626.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS CAMP 338.00 424564 5/17/2018 103594 EDINALARM INC. 68.40 460422 31414 5861.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 34.20 460450 31415 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY 102.60 424565 5/17/2018 137586 EGAN, WENDY 19.20 ARTWORK SOLD 460032 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.20 424566 5/17/2018 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC. 240.00 TIF REPORTING 460585 76816 9238.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER SOUTHDALE 2 TIF DISTRICT 240.00 424567 5/17/2018 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,558.00 LIGHTS FOR VARIOUS SQUADS 460402 SVC26432 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,558.00 424568 5/17/2018 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 939.80 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 460443 1986523 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 939.80 424569 5/17/2018 136689 ENKI BREWING COMPANY INC. 247.94 459922 8952 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 220.50 460330 9004 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 468.44 424570 5/17/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 82.66 FITTINGS 460075 1-5570887 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 134.31 HUB ASSY 460532 1-5575949 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 135.12 BATTERIES 460512 1-Z14411 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.49 PRESSURE GAUGE 460513 69-308616 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.66 FAN AND MOTOR 460525 69-308811 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.96 BATTERY 460519 69-309209 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.66 FILTER 460082 69-309412 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 513.71 ALTERNATOR 460524 69-309747 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 78.76 TENSIONER , BELT 460515 69-310173 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 — Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424570 5/17/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY Continued... 515.46 BRAKE KITS, ROTORS 460526 69-310394 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.05 BATTERIES 460527 69-310400 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,788.84 424571 5/17/2018 122549 FARNER-BOCKEN COMPANY - USE 140999 531.39 CONCESSIONS FOOD 460575 6501770 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 531.39 424572 5/17/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 553.72 METER FLANGE KIT 459927 279417 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 553.72 424573 5/17/2018 141837 FIRST CHOICE COFFEE SERVICES 74.93 COFFEE 459953 350923 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 164.31 COFFEE 460023 356648 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 239.24 424574 5/17/2018 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 575.00 RAMP WINDOW CLEANING 460368 2315-25588 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 570.00 RAMP WINDOW CLEANING 460367 2315-25771 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,145.00 424575 5/17/2018 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 479.37 MERCHANDISE 459954 11773763 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 479.37 424576 5/17/2018 142466 GEAR WASH 2,437.74 C-SHIFT PPE REPAIR & MAINT. 460721 14110 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,437.74 424577 5/17/2018 141336 GEOGRAPHIC INDUSTRIES INC. 2,000.00 FINAL RETAINAGE 460123 16184 47093.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK SIGNAGE IMPRVMNT PROJECT 2,000.00 424578 5/17/2018 142407 GO PERMITS, LLC 98.16 REF: 10437733 460009 159657 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 100.07 REF: 10727097 460008 162008 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 198.23 424579 5/17/2018 101103 GRAINGER R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page- 17 Business Unit 424579 5/17/2018 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 100.00 EAR PLUGS, MARKERS, BATTERIES 460520 9780585148 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 124.98 EAR PLUGS, MARKERS, BATTERIES 460520 9780585148 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 EAR PLUGS, MARKERS, BATTERIES 460520 9780585148 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 422.48 PAPER PLATES 460394 9780952777 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,332.80 LIGHTING BALLASTS 460149 9781140240 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 112.58 PLASTIC UTENSILS 460395 9781242814 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 128.50 PLASTIC UTENSILS 460396 9782652003 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 9.54 HIGHLIGHTERS 460542 9784019722 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 267.29 CLEANER DEGREASER 460543 9785096786 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,598.17 424580 5/17/2018 120201 GRANICUS INC. 500.00 SPEAK UP, EDINA 460564 97383 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 690.00 WEBSTREAMING 460564 97383 1554.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,190.00 424581 5/17/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 729.75 459914 00038869 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 181.75 460072 MN00038918 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 150.25 460279 MN00039185 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 208.75 460278 MN00039186 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 677.50 460323 MN0003979 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 212.25 460626 MN00039229 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,160.25 424582 5/17/2018 136517 GRAY, SUSAN 61.20 ARTWORK SOLD 460018 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.20 424583 5/17/2018 142446 GREEN, AMY 420.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE MODELING 460122 051018 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 420.00 424584 5/17/2018 137730 HAACK, BRENDA 51.60 ARTWORK SOLD 460068 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 51.60 424585 5/17/2018 100797 HAWKINS INC. 6,280.44 H2O CHEMICALS 460766 4277067 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 6,280.44 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 18 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 — Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424585 424586 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 100797 HAWKINS INC. 142440 HEARTLAND SPORTS, LLC Continued... 498.00 GOAL 460159 H2506 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 498.00 424587 5/17/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,620.80 FIRE DEPT RADIO FEES 460115 1000110282 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,620.80 424588 5/17/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 2,451.46 POLICE DEPT RADIO FEES 460116 1000110283 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,451.46 424589 5/17/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 169.00 HENN CO INFO TECH 460663 1000110218 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 169.00 424590 5/17/2018 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 29.52 ICE PACKS 460025 52837879 5710.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 29.52 424591 5/17/2018 141418 HILL, STEVEN 60.00 ARTWORK SOLD 460092 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 60.00 424592 5/17/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 902.00 460339 960733 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,139.00 460183 962166 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,757.90 460288 962168 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.50- 460289 962169 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,921.50 460605 962170 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,694.90 424593 5/17/2018 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 111.97 TESTING SOLUTIONS 460418 180504105 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 111.97 424594 5/17/2018 103869 HOTSYMINNESOTA.COM 367.28 NOZZLES, TRIGGERS 460521 59404 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 367.28 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 19 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 - Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424594 424595 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 103869 HOTSYMINNESOTA.COM 124698 HOYE, PAMELA Continued... 2.25 ARTWORK SOLD 460020 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.25 424596 5/17/2018 139772 HUSEBY, MARY 24.00 ARTWORK SOLD 460014 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 24.00 424597 5/17/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 7.54 FILTERS 459959 038043942 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.48 FILTERS 460538 038044680 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13.99 VALVE 460537 038044688 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.01 424598 5/17/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 1,038.50 460629 63415 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,601.00 460052 63419 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,406.00 460297 63715 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,469.00 460644 63716 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,514.50 424599 5/17/2018 140784 JEFF'S TRANSPORT 550.00 TRANSPORT ZAM TO R AND R 460678 1196 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 550.00 424600 5/17/2018 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 265.00 WATER SHUTOFF NOTICES 460081 78380 5924.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 265.00 424601 5/17/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 17,171.80 459937 2809075 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.55 460031 2809094 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,207.75 460035 2809095 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,445.06 459918 2809096 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21.50 459917 2809097 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,395.70 460300 2809121 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,539.05 459948 2809122 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 99.35 460295 2809123 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.55 460625 2809124 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 20 Business Unit 424601 5/17/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued-. 3,675.85 460643 3675 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 44,607.16 424602 5/17/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 732.95 460169 1004375 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 661.83 460170 1004376 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,791.29 460172 1004379 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,012.49 460171 1004380 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,450.94 460174 1004381 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 81.19 460173 1004382 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 208.10 460303 1004383 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.38 460175 1004385 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,963.35 460176 1004386 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.38 460302 1004389 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,624.36 460301 1004390 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,968.25 460304 1004391 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,394.09 460306 1004392 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,120.92 460305 1004393 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,829.27 460309 1004394 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.19 460308 1004395 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 799.70 460307 1004396 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 38.19 460627 1004400 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,603.86 460607 1004401 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,317.85 460647 1004402 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,335.86 460609 1004403 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,848.99 460651 1004404 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,970.62 460608 1004405 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.19 460650 1004406 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 342.20 460649 1004407 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,945.45 460589 1004408 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,172.76 460318 1005639 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 293.19 460591 1005640 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,262.96 460045 5998937 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 232.76 460040 5998941 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,120.98 460063 5998944 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.38 460038 5998945 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,509.02 460049 5998946 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,685.04 460059 5998947 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,676.88 460060 5998948 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 560.11 460046 5998949 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 21 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424602 5/17/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 2,361.25 460047 5998950 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 114.57 459912 5998954 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,786.30 459890 5998955 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,291.66 459891 5998956 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,856.96 459887 5998957 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,202.10 459886 5998958 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,037.89 459882 5998959 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 49.19 459885 5998960 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12.48 459889 5998961 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,434.64 459888 5998962 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7.68- 460073 676335 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 71,994.33 424603 5/17/2018 141864 JOSEPH E JOHNSON & SONS CONSTRUCTION 1,620.00 460681 1020 5553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 2,448.00 ROPE 460681 1020 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 5,500.00 DOME TAKEDOWN CORDINATION 460681 1020 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 9,568.00 424604 5/17/2018 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 150.00 DOOR REKEY 460691 S1060085 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 424605 5/17/2018 130215 KUEHL, RHONDA 15.60 ARTWORK SOLD 460011 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 15.60 424606 5/17/2018 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 124.00 CONTRACTED REPAIR 460540 81663 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.00 424607 5/17/2018 142438 LAMBRECHT, JOSEPH 194.50 SPRINKLER REIMBURSEMENT 460010 20180509 01441.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Birchcrest A 194.50 424608 5/17/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 807.19 NUTS, WASHERS, BITS, SCREWS 459936 9305796733 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.15 WHITE MARKER PAINT 460119 9305796734 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 645.13 FUSE HOLDERS, BITS, CONNECTORS 460546 9305814495 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,537.47 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check 4 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO it CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 — 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page- 22 Business Unit 424608 424609 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Continued... 3,234.16 PD LOSSES FOR CLAIM 3-5-18 460772 3475 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 3,234.16 424610 5/17/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 5,581.80 APRIL WC DEDUCTIBLE 460774 1003628/5-2018 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 5,581.80 424611 5/17/2018 113952 LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC. 1,340.00 SURVEY EQUIPMENT/SOFTWARE 460080 901348511 1261.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 1,340.00 424612 5/17/2018 142444 LUNDEEN, CORT 34.50 REFUND 460098 117392 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 34.50 424613 5/17/2018 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 16,616.77 UNLEADED FUEL 459946 797257 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,117.71 UNLEADED FUEL 459945 798618 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9,093.65 DIESEL FUEL 460769 800194 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,558.51 DIESEL FUEL 460768 801033 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31,386.64 424614 5/17/2018 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 570.00 ST. PAUL SAINTS GAME TRIP 460106 SAINTS 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GAME-5/23 570.00 424615 5/17/2018 103720 MEDTECH 440.46 8000 FLOWRIDER WRISTBANDS 460417 65646 5330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FLOWRIDER 440.46 424616 5/17/2018 137195 MELBY, MELISSA 16.20 ARTWORK SOLD 460004 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.20 424617 5/17/2018 100883 MESSERLI & KRAMER 5,000.00 GRGREEN LEGIS REPR 460740 350334 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV-LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,000.00 GRGREEN LEGIS REPR 460739 350335 9232.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 — 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 23 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424617 5/17/2018 100883 MESSERLI & KRAMER Continued... 6,000.00 424618 5/17/2018 100885 METRO SALES INC 14.34 MFP SUPPLIES 459930 INV1064236 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 14.34 424619 5/17/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 332.20 CONTRACTED REPAIR 460528 331665 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,285.18 CONTRACTED REPAIR 460757 331949 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,617.38 424620 5/17/2018 139880 MID CITY SERVICES - INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY 44.00 RUG LAUNDERING 460104 80105 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.00 424621 5/17/2018 142453 MIDWEST ASPHALT SERVICES, LLC 54,336.20 PAY #1 460710 NORMANDALE PAY 01446.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 1 5,700.00 PAY #1 460710 NORMANDALE PAY 03508.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 1 21,375.00 PAY #1 460710 NORMANDALE PAY 05576.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 1 8,265.00 PAY #1 460710 NORMANDALE PAY 04434.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 1 89,676.20 424622 5/17/2018 100892 MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO. INC. 11.60- GALLERY- GENERAL SUPPLIES 460793 114437 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 11.60 460793 114437 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 11.60 GALLERY- GENERAL SUPPLIES 460793 114437 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 11.60 424623 5/17/2018 122201 MILLER TOWING INC. 500.00 TOWING SERVICE 460518 258903 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 500.00 424624 5/17/2018 122473 MILLER, KATHERINE 4.74 ARTWORK SOLD 460005 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 4.74 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 - Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424625 5/17/2018 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT Continued... 11,762.64 460217 431-0005.300-5/ 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 18 11,762.64 424626 5/17/2018 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 10.75 460389 180105263-A 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5.38 460448 180107142 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.51 460449 180107143 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 37.64 424627 5/17/2018 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 1,154.14 460794 104151 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,154.14 424628 5/17/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 CFM 460795 05152018 5520.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA CONCESSIONS 35.00 424629 5/17/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 52.00 A.C.60TH POSTERS 459929 25087 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 51.00 460406 25106 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 51.00 460406 25106 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 51.00 460406 25106 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,271.00 SUMMER ENTERTAINMENT SCH. 460559 25126 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 21.50 OPEN HOUSE CARDS 460734 25160 5913.6575 PRINTING DISTRIBUTION 1,497.50 424630 5/17/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 175.50 460347 5548 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 112.50 460071 5657 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 279.00 459901 5658 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 592.00 460284 5720 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 307.25- 460593 5721 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 307.25 460593 5721 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 307.25 460593 5721 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,466.25 424631 5/17/2018 141377 MONTGOMERY BREWING COMPANY LLC 130.50 460314 051118 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 205.50 460592 50105 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 - Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424631 424632 5/17/2018 141377 MONTGOMERY BREWING COMPANY LLC 105595 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. Continued... 5/17/2018 336.00 82.43 REPAIR PARTS 460780 1163293-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 82.43 424633 5/17/2018 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.04 SWITCH 460516 2122-3291521 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.04 424634 5/17/2018 141215 NEGOCE LLC 143.46 459892 6/3/2018 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 143.46 424635 5/17/2018 100763 NEOPOST USA INC 251.67 POSTAGE RENT AND MAINT 460399 55734083 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 251.67 424636 5/17/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 179.00 460630 130907 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 73.50 460051 130908 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 89.50 459942 131145 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 474.50 460299 131146 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 534.50 460641 131147 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 121.50 460606 131202 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,472.50 424637 5/17/2018 141357 NIEHAUS, CJ 57.00 ARTWORK SOLD 459992 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 57.00 424638 5/17/2018 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 218.63 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 460442 902887101 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 218.63 424639 5/17/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 120.78 RATCHET ASSEMBLY 460076 618850 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 120.78 424640 5/17/2018 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 26 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424640 5/17/2018 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC Continued... 285.00 460341 E-2181 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 325.00 459941 E-2231 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 325.00 460646 E-2232 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 325.00 460329 E-2233 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,260.00 424641 5/17/2018 139247 OMNI RAIL PRODUCTS INC. 6,957.50 MSA MAINTENANCE 460432 M031028 01267.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS MSA Maintenance Projects 6,957.50 424642 5/17/2018 102440 PASS, GRACE 23.40 ARTWORK SOLD 459993 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 23.40 424643 5/17/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,533.00 459943 10342 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,451.00 460274 10345 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.00 460275 10346 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,632.45 460622 10355 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,562.35 460633 9639 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 87.00 460632 9640 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,352.80 424644 5/17/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 909.30 460029 48254956 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 583.41 CONCESSIONS FOOD 460164 52847459 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 672.98 SODAAND WATER 460556 52847468 5761.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 355.30 460624 53114764 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,520.99 424645 5/17/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 3,857.27 460344 2345851 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 600.00 460342 2346887 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 421.20 460391 2346889 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,728.03 460054 2350593 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,796.68 460048 2350594 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 86.84 460037 2350595 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,141.85 460653 2350596 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 689.83 459913 2350597 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,321.72 459899 2350601 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 27 Business Unit 424645 5/17/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 3.57 459897 2350602 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 459898 2350603 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,322.91 460042 2350604 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3.57 460044 2350605 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 164.65 459896 2350609 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,771.94 460177 2354401 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 262.04 460178 2354402 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 606.76 460179 2354403 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 74.38 460180 2354404 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 237.16 460311 2354406 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,167.34 460310 2354407 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,334.79 460312 2354408 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 341.95- 460610 2354411 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 341.95 460610 2354411 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 341.95 460610 2354411 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,210.16 460611 2354412 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,328.41 460612 2354413 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.72- 460077 292529 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 31,474.90 424646 5/17/2018 132808 PLANTE, WILLIAM 1,902.00 AMB REF 44261861 460789 051518 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,000.00 AMB REF 46719641 460790 51518 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,902.00 424647 5/17/2018 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC 1,669.70 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 460156 1400221188 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,669.70 424648 5/17/2018 131291 PPG ARCHITECTURAL FINISHES 38.26 PAINT PAMELA PARK 460364 985102047350 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.26 424649 5/17/2018 106072 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC. 255.00 BRAEMAR MAINTENANCE REPORT 460127 11168 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 255.00 424650 5/17/2018 131064 PRECISION PRINTING INC. 262.00 JR PASS KEY TAGS 460778 3133 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 262.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 — Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424650 424651 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 131064 PRECISION PRINTING INC. 123377 PROFESSIONAL BEVERAGE SYSTEMS INC. Continued... 127.50 POP FACHINE ICE REPAIR 460677 42916 5520.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA CONCESSIONS 127.50 424652 5/17/2018 123078 QUALIFIED LABORATORIES INC. 300.13 PW SUPPLIES URINAL SCREEN 460369 56483 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 300.13 PARKS SUPPLIES URINAL SCREEN 460369 56483 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 600.26 424653 5/17/2018 133091 RANGE SERVANT AMERICA INC. 162.33 REPAIR PARTS BALL PICKER 460783 87556 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 162.33 424654 5/17/2018 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 966.85 460713 6522 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 966.85 424655 5/17/2018 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 193.00 460325 K-35335138 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 193.00 424656 5/17/2018 141687 REIKER, PAT 81.00 ARTWORK SOLD 459990 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 81.00 424657 5/17/2018 142443 REMES, JOHN 87.57 REFUND 460096 100238 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 87.57 424658 5/17/2018 133627 REPUBLIC SERVICES #894 39,321.72 460216 0894-004623098 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 39,321.72 424659 5/17/2018 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 22.68 TIE DOWN RINGS 460514 1927987653 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 275.11 TOOL BOX 460530 1927989273 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 297.79 424660 5/17/2018 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 29 Business Unit 424660 5/17/2018 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. Continued... 946.92 SOFTNER SALT 460675 357389 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 946.92 424661 5/17/2018 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 93.54 459880 18-02208 5800.1353 INVENTORY WNE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 93.54 424662 5/17/2018 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 183.45 BRAKE CLEANER 460539 76566959 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.21 PARTS WASHER CLEAN 460510 R002495320 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 307.66 424663 5/17/2018 129828 SAUNDERS, NATE 12.00 ARTWORK SOLD 459988 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.00 424664 5/17/2018 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 927.84 LIBRARY SENIOR ELEVATOR 460365 8104788767 1653.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 927.84 424665 5/17/2018 142215 SCHOOL SPACE MEDIA, LLC 385.20 SCHOOL SPACE MEDIA 460125 4508 1600.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 385.20 SCHOOL SPACE MEDIA 460125 4508 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 385.20 SCHOOL SPACE MEDIA 460125 4508 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 385.20 SCHOOL SPACE MEDIA 460125 4508 5710.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 385.20 SCHOOL SPACE MEDIA 460125 4508 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 1,926.00 424666 5/17/2 018 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 40.80 ARTWORK SOLD 459987 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 7.47 REIMBURSEMENT ART SUPPLIES 460435 051118 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 9.98 REIMBURSEMENT 460350 051118-2 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 40.78 REIMBURSEMENT ART SUPPLIES 460351 051118-3 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 13.68 ART SUPPLIES 460352 051118-4 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 49.18 ART SUPPLIES 460353 051118-5 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 28.95 ART SUPPLIES REIEMBURSEMENT 460354 051118-6 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 190.84 424667 5/17/2018 101556 SHRED-IT USA 78.05 SHREDDING 460440 8124636810 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 30 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424667 5/17/2018 101556 SHRED-IT USA Continued... 258.70 SHREDDING SERVICE 459931 8124639312 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 336.75 424668 5/17/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 183.32 COMPRESSOR SIGNS 460583 12889 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 96.00 SIGN FOR THE CITY LOTS FOR SAL 460664 12900 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 50.62 NORTH RAMP EXP - CONST SIGNAGE 460775 12906 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 329.94 424669 5/17/2018 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 681.03 LOGO APPAREL 460101 912627 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 681.03 424670 5/17/2018 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 120.69 WEED KILLER 460120 85581536 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 227.89 PIPE REPAIR 460154 85647749 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 348.58 424671 5/17/2018 141689 SMISEK, JAIME 25.20 ARTWORK SOLD 459986 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.20 424672 5/17/2018 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 128.88 PICK SET, STETHOSCOPE 459934 ARV/36064327 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.81 PICK SET, PRYBAR 459935 ARV/36066406 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.69 BATTERY 460535 ARV/36118454 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 357.72 SOCKETS 460544 ARV/36125438 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 644.10 424673 5/17/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 596.58 460332 1677599 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,197.65 460638 1677600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,388.47 460333 1677601 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 62.66 460336 1677602 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,881.60 460033 1678932 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,881.60 459905 1678933 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 90.80 459902 1678934 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .40 459904 1678935 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 459903 1678936 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 880.00 459947 1679528 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 31 Business Unit 424673 5/17/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 880.00 459879 1679529 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 880.00 460640 1679530 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 785.97 459949 1680222 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,214.16 459950 1680223 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,166.00 459952 1680224 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,605.20 459951 1680225 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,377.56 460290 1680226 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,987.18 460293 1680227 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,767.74 460287 1680228 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,029.60 460291 1680229 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 921.66 460617 1680230 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 243.20 460616 1680231 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,002.20 460615 1680232 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 317.60 460619 1680233 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,268.00 460618 1680234 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,157.60- 460590 1681627 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,157.60 460590 1681627 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,157.60 460590 1681627 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 526.87 460292 5029680 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 526.87 460639 5029682 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 346.40 460334 5029683 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 39,984.37 424674 5/17/2018 110977 SOW, ADAMA 75.60 ARTWORK SOLD 459983 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 75.60 424675 5/17/2018 142441 SPINOSA, PAT 2.40 ARTWORK SOLD 460094 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.40 424676 5/17/2018 134700 SPOK INC. 189.60 PAGERS 460541 B0319246Q 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 189.60 424677 5/17/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 395.00 459916 21235 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 160.00 460030 21236 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 242.00 460614 21359 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 198.00 460286 21360 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 32 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 — Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424677 424678 5/17/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 142468 STEPHEN DONNELLY COMPANY INC Continued... 5/17/2018 995.00 4,200.00 STUCCO REPAIRS TO WESTARENA 460741 22276 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 4,200.00 424679 5/17/2018 142442 STORCK, SUSAN 104.40 ARTWORK SOLD 460095 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 104.40 424680 5/17/2018 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC. 193.99 CABLING WORK 460401 20916 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 193.99 424681 5/17/2018 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 285.10 TIRES 460523 10153032 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 285.10 424682 5/17/2018 142447 SUNDICK, LAUREN 1.75 RESERVATION FEE REFUND 460124 51018 1000.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 23.25 RESERVATION FEE REFUND 460124 51018 1600.4722.02 ATHLETIC FIELDS RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 25.00 424683 5/17/2018 134963 TC HOMEBUILDERS INC. 10,000.00 5433 OAKLAWN ESCROW REFUND 459994 151051 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 424684 5/17/2018 102798 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 686.80 APRIL CHARGES 460533 838163560 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 686.80 424685 5/17/2018 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA 346.66 460423 2018-194015 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 346.66 460423 2018-194015 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 346.68 460423 2018-194015 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,040.00 424686 5/17/2018 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 418.00 DRAFT CC MINUTES 4/17 460686 M23760 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 418.00 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page- 33 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 — Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424686 424687 5/17/2018 5/17/2018 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 136802 TINBERG, TIM Continued... 85.91 CABLE SUPPLIES 460743 51318 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 85.91 424688 5/17/2018 120595 T-MOBILE 35.00 SURVEY GPS 460371 477067848-4/18 1261.6188 TELEPHONE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 35.00 424689 5/17/2018 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 617.46 WELDING REGULATOR, TIPS 460511 23600 10242596 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 617.46 424690 5/17/2018 123649 TOWMASTER 121.92 REPLACEMENT PLATE 460529 403904 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.92 424691 5/17/2018 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 125.06 AIR FILTERS 460580 0635865-IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 125.06 424692 5/17/2018 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 823.75 TOM S OFFICE DOOR 460377 943202 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 145.87- TOM S. OFFICE DOOR FRAME 459450 PSCO26721 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 677.88 424693 5/17/2018 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 79.90 FLOWER FERT 460161 42076 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 79.90 424694 5/17/2018 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC. 3,796.23 MAN LIFT RENTAL 460579 156690022-001 5521.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ICE MAINT 3,796.23 424695 5/17/2018 141397 UPTOWN PLUMBING HEATING & COOLING 245.54 DUPLICATE PERMIT 459996 162780 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 245.54 424696 5/17/2018 140954 URBAN GROWLER BREWING COMPANY LLC 264.00 460634 E-20816 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 34 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/17/2018 - Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424696 424697 5/17/2018 140954 URBAN GROWLER BREWING COMPANY LLC 101058 VAN PAPER CO. Continued... 5/17/2018 264.00 674.26 460429 462529-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 111.46 460430 462533-00 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 61.92 460431 462533-01 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 336.14 460428 462549-00 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 29.85 460425 462550-00 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 488.98 460426 462555-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 30.10 460427 462556-00 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,732.71 424698 5/17/2018 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 165.45 ELECT MATERIAL FOR TOM S OFFIC 459928 S001491879.001 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 165.45 424699 5/17/2018 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 183.91 460716 3136238 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 128.00 460715 3136239 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 311.91 424700 5/17/2018 102886 WAGNERS 1,107.22 FLOWERS AND ANNUALS 460560 22180 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,107.22 424701 5/17/2018 116436 WALTERS GARDENS INC. 529.80 FLOWERS AND BULBS 459923 00080388 5765.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS PROMENADE EXPENSES 529.80 424702 5/17/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 5,813.65 50TH AND FRANCE TRASH PICKUP 460745 7793861-2282-3 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,644.40 50TH TRASH CENTER 460764 7793862-2282-1 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,910.37 50TH TRASH SOUTH 460765 7793863-2282-9 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 1,178.01 50TH AND FRANCE TRASH BESPOKE 460763 7793864-2282-7 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 13,546.43 424703 5/17/2018 142194 WE CATER TO YOU 222.58 SUPERHERO LUNCH 460787 4359 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 222.58 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page- 35 Business Unit 424704 5/17/2018 137134 WEIERS, STEVE Continued... 159.98 UNIFORM JEANS 460744 051418SW 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 159.98 424705 5/17/2018 141991 WEISGRAM, MARY 88.80 ARTWORK SOLD 459963 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 88.80 424706 5/17/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 625.14 459883 7181639 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 105.19 460041 7181641 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.88 460039 7181644 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,514.55 460062 7181645 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,864.58 459884 7181647 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 460269 7182596 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,037.17 460313 7182598 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 338.38 460268 7182599 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 460656 7182600 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,623.85 460270 7182603 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 845.95 460655 7182604 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 83.76 460319 7182605 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,447.27 460628 7182606 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 847.14 460600 7182607 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.88 460648 7182608 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 507.57 460267 7182667 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 30,926.69 424707 5/17/2018 141271 WOLFF, MELINDA 52.80 ARTWORK SOLD 459964 050918 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 52.80 424708 5/17/2018 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,369.67 GIS ONSITE TIME 460707 R-011528-000-3 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 394.94 GIS ONSITE TIME 460707 R-011528-000-3 5924.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - WATER 394.95 GIS ONSITE TIME 460707 R-011528-000-3 5925.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - SEWER 394.94 GIS ONSITE TIME 460707 R-011528-000-3 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 3,554.50 424709 5/17/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 28.58 460258 589230489 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 47.07 460254 589230861 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Council Check Register by GL Page - 36 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # 5/17/2018 - Doc No Inv No 5/17/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424709 5/17/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued-. 57.26 460220 589289898 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 89.64 460259 589305714 5937.6185 LIGHT & POWER INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 14.22 460257 589317814 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 11.00 460218 589342558 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 23.22 460230 589351387 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 23.79 460256 589351907 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 17.65 460227 589355607 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 226.78 460231 589355641 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 86.19 460229 589355937 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 14.71 460225 589365101 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 39.01 460209 589366319 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 15.43 460224 589367330 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 24.30 460253 589370894 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 43.41 460261 589375716 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 69.45 460226 589375947 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.40 460223 589377753 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 40.52 460255 589378884 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 20.55 460260 589386203 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 15.23 460228 589405642 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 38.19 460264 589413399 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 29,487.52 460221 589470430 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,139.33 460249 589475475 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,050.55 460243 589483549 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 701.44 460245 589516101 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 166.27 460239 589518925 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 166.31 460263 589524178 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 12.02 460219 589525318 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 8,792.10 460250 589528549 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 235.92 460246 589528770 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 1,966.40 460248 589532623 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 24.88 460244 589538738 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 16.39 460242 589539425 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 14.01 460251 589544092 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 74.66 460241 589547684 5936.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRC 16.39 460240 589547971 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 15.04 460265 589551584 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.78 460262 589572798 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 33.20 460238 589579856 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 716.12 460233 589655270 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/17/2018 — 5/17/2018 5/16/2018 11:47:14 Page - 37 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424709 6/17/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued-. 182.78 460234 589659152 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 510.41 460235 589659423 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,493.95 460235 589659423 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 529.25 460232 589692184 5765.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE EXPENSES 40.00 460252 589703207 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,410.07 460236 589830838 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 2,341.27 460237 590002181 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 4,240.69 460222 590757675 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 3,246.22 460588 590951462 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59,640.57 424710 6/17/2018 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 452.00 460285 20211 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 452.00 424711 5/17/2018 101091 ZIEGLER INC 40.79 HOSE, RINGS, SEALS 460522 PC001968505 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 921.72 CONTRACTED REPAIR 460074 SW140161590 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 962.51 962,693.09 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 860,815.31 101,877.78 962,693.09 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 5/16/2018 11:47:25 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 1 5/17/2018 - 5/17/2018 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 218,462.10 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 5.99 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 39,668.13 04100 PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 54,530.70 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 49,460.00 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,805.50 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,006.40 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 2,216.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 13,225.65 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 16,431.34 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 9,851.49 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 5,921.99 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 11,462.45 05800 LIQUOR FUND 368,279.85 05900 UTILITY FUND 55,361.97 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 10,567.05 05950 RECYCLING FUND 39,321.72 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 8,815.96 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,155.01 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 49,050.69 09238 SOUTHDALE 2 DISTRICT 240.00 09900 PAYROLL FUND 2,853.10 Report Totals 962,693.09 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 1 Business Unit 6447 5/24/2018 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 268.97 HANDLE, HANGER, TUBE SECTION 461008 0156012 IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 268.97 6448 5/24/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 120.01 461310 2234955 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24.91 461316 2234958 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.92 6449 5/24/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,903.60 461062 64235300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.55 460948 64235500 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,365.25 460947 64236300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 322.07 461061 97626200 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 115.34 460946 97626300 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,791.81 6450 5/24/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 20.77 STAPLE PULLERS 461167 139242 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 174.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 461193 139279 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 194.97 6451 5/24/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 397.25 460965 67-4058 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 522.00 461313 67-4059 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 919.25 6452 5/24/2018 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES INC. 822.00 CUSTODIAL SERVICES - MARCH 460826 7070250891 5720.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 822.00 6453 5/24/2018 104020 DALCO 93.78 SPECTRUM EXTRACT 461272 3224529 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 332.07 KAIVAC CLEANING SOLUTION 460833 3316176 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 425.85 6454 5/24/2018 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL 769.50 LESSONS 5/4-5/16/18 461108 51718 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 769.50 6455 5/24/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 2 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6455 5/24/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. Continued... 575.65 EDITION: EDINA PRINTING 460822 596306 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 353.00 HRRC DOR MARKETING 461122 596307 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 383.00 EDITION: EDINA PRINTING 460823 596308 1130.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 1,311.65 6456 5/24/2018 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1,656.00 LESSONS 5/3-5/16/18 461001 51718 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,656.00 6457 5/24/2018 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 454.00 EAST CHILLER REPAIR 460862 57888 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,740.50 SOUTH CHILLER REPAIR 460863 57890 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 3,510.32 EASTALARM ISSUE 460864 57894 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 5,704.82 6458 5/24/2018 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 535.50 LESSONS 5/3-5/16/18 461000 51718 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 535.50 6459 5/24/2018 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 17.28 WHITE PAINT 461185 03268322 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.28 6460 5/24/2018 129508 IMPACT 3,298.17 461289 132750 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,298.17 6461 5/24/2018 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 72.44 IRRIGATION REPAIR 461150 INV037528 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 72.44 6462 5/24/2018 108618 JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC. 81.37 FIRE HYDRANT ADAPTERS 461140 245369 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 81.37 6463 5/24/2018 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 34.00 CV BATH 461164 130749 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 34.00 ROSLAND BATH 461165 130750 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 59.50 LEWIS BATH 461166 130751 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 127.50 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 3 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 - Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6463 6464 5/24/2018 5/24/2018 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 115192 KNUDSON, DEBORAH Continued... 1,174.50 LESSONS 5/3-5/16/18 461002 51718 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 1,174.50 6465 5/24/2018 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 26.54 IACIS TRAINING EXPENSE 461155 540671596 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 101.21 IACIS TRAINING EXPENSE 461155 540671596 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 127.75 6466 5/24/2018 101483 MENARDS 77.11 SPRAY 460872 67832 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.04 RAZOR BLADES, SCRAPER 460831 67923 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 139.79 CLR FOR PLAY STRUCTURE 460834 67962 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 49.99- ST. 1 FAN REPAIR 461053 67974 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 49.99 CEILING FAN FOR FIRE 1. 461053 67974 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 49.99 FIRE ST. 1 APPARATUS CEILING F 461053 67974 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.35 MATERIAL FOR LS TRUCK 460989 68174 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 34.99 CB TRAILER HOSE 460989 68174 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 145.80 RANGE SUPPLIES 461271 68245 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 24.95 MAG BIT HOLDER 461188 68282 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 40.67 BALLARD PAINT 461224 68329 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 63.13 CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES 461121 68332 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 115.36 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL 461120 68354 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 23.80 CONSTRUCTION LUMBER 461187 68408 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 589.46 EAGLE PROJECT 461160 68416 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE 96.96 NET SUPPLIES 461225 68457 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 99.47 MAILBOX POST MATERIAL 461197 68675 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 1,574.87 6467 5/24/2018 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS LLC 865.00 AERATOR SERVICE 460865 2639 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR( 1,130.00 AERATOR SERVICE 460866 2640 5937.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INDIANHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTR 1,995.00 6468 5/24/2018 129485 PAPCO INC. 177.90 CLEANING 461275 207085 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 177.90 6469 5/24/2018 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 4 Business Unit 6469 5/24/2018 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN INC. Continued... 9,082.31 ANNUAL ZAM MAINTENANCE 461094 0065016-IN 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 62.05 BATTERY CAPS 461221 0065023-IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 9,144.36 6470 5/24/2018 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 670.70 RPZ TEST 461127 73829 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 670.70 6471 5/24/2018 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 57.62 BUSINESS CARDS FOR SCHWEITZER 461054 100129 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 57.62 6472 5/24/2018 135312 SUSSMAN, MIKE 56.17 MICROWAVE FOR PRECINCT 461261 20180522MS 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 56.17 6473 5/24/2018 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 101.14 SWEEPER PART 460871 E105929 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 762.52 TAILGATE 460870 E105903 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 863.66 6474 5/24/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 301.00 461311 207011 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 301.00 6475 5/24/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,663.15 461029 71525 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,217.83 460905 71526 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,880.98 424712 5/24/2018 105696 3CMA 380.00 2018 SAVVY AWARD ENTRIES 461111 2018SAWYAWARDS 1130.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 380.00 424713 5/24/2018 100611 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 130.95 EQUIPMENT RENTAL- SAW 460971 125947 5422.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 130.95 424714 5/24/2018 129458 ACME TOOLS 663.90 POWER BROOM 461043 5735463 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 5 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424714 5/24/2018 129458 ACME TOOLS Continued... 474.00 CHARGER AND FUEL COMBO KIT 461125 5747281 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 392.16 461145 5748872 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 265.99 TOOLS BS 461133 5750925 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 647.00 TOOLS BS 461134 5752172 1321.6556 TOOLS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,443.05 424715 5/24/2018 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 50,195.00 SWTV HD CABLECAST INSTALLATION 460874 SYSINV22347DB 1132.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES CABLE COMMISSION 50,195.00 424716 5/24/2018 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 219.73 COFFEE SUPPLIES 461325 156403 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 219.73 424717 5/24/2018 141768 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC. 185.00 PUMP 460868 10948850 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 185.00 424718 5/24/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 39.96 PAINT SPRAYER 461171 13PL-Y7LD-KT6H 5761.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 42.67 SIGNS 460820 17WN-M9T6-CH1F 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 65.98 CHRIS ROTTY 460817 17WN-M9T6-KLGX 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENAADMINISTRATION 29.43 SUNSCREEN 460821 19TY-VRT6-JNJL 5760.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 45.84 GEL COAT 461172 1WH3-3DHJ-1FPW 5761.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 223.88 424719 5/24/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 194.79 LAUNDRY 461281 1004142627 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 141.71 LAUNDRY 461282 1004144682 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 336.50 424720 5/24/2018 142495 APEX ENERGY SOLUTIONS 90.00 APP FEE - WRONG PERMIT 461267 163158 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 74.00 APP FEE - WRONG PERMIT 461268 163159 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 143.50 APP FEE - WRONG PERMIT 461266 163160 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 71.50 APP FEE-WRONG PERMIT 461265 163161 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 379.00 424721 5/24/2018 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 3,670.80 PAMELA REPAIR 461148 85756 1643.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL TURF CARE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 6 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 — Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424721 424722 5/24/2018 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 137556 ARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE Continued... 5/24/2018 3,670.80 2,081.25 GRANDVIEW GREEN ARCH CONCEPT 461014 201808-3/18 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,293.75 GRANDVIEW GREEN ARCH CONCEPT 461015 201808-4/18 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,375.00 424723 5/24/2018 129829 ARCMATE MANUFACTURING CORP. 414.87 LITTER PICKERS 460873 INV108727 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 414.87 424724 5/24/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 1,602.00 460964 3262770 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 168.00 461056 3262772 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,913.00 461057 3262774 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 246.36- 461048 422323 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,436.64 424725 5/24/2018 119465 ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA COUNTIES 150.00 461077 49812 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 150.00 424726 5/24/2018 136687 BALLANTINE PAINTING 1,963.00 NORTH RAMP EXP WAYFINDING 461016 1013 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 1,963.00 424727 5/24/2018 118883 BAN-KOE SYSTEMS INC. 327.75 LOBBY ALARM REPAIR 461220 85030 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 327.75 424728 5/24/2018 139473 BENGTSON, MIKE 325.00 TASER RECERT REIMBURSEMENT 461156 20180517175 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 325.00 424729 5/24/2018 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC. 312.00 PIZZA 460829 4752787 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 312.00 424730 5/24/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 20.00 460908 426056 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 7 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 - Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424730 5/24/2018 125139 BERNICK'S Continued-. 568.90 460910 426057 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 897.78 461030 426211 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,486.68 424731 5/24/2018 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 349.55 CONCESSIONS FOOD 461213 560808 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 349.55 424732 5/24/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 441.00 460911 2365 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 441.00 461066 2367 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 882.00 424733 5/24/2018 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 4,556.97 REPLACEMENT LED HEADS 461256 915306662 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 7,342.50 461260 915315989 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 11,899.47 424734 5/24/2018 140149 BORGSTROM, ERIK JON 533.33 460875 E0014 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 533.33 460875 E0014 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 533.34 460875 E0014 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,600.00 424735 5/24/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,318.50 460876 150876 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,241.50 461312 150989 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,165.00 461319 151071 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,725.00 424736 5/24/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 114.34 SURGE TANK 461189 1226591 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 68.64 RADIATOR, PIN 461190 1226628 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.00 U-JOINT KIT 461191 1227541 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 542.97 INPUT SHAFT 461192 1227581 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 775.95 424737 5/24/2018 142477 BOYLE, PATRICK 175.57 REFUND 461201 00116094 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 175.57 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page - 8 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424737 424738 5/24/2018 5/24/2018 142477 BOYLE, PATRICK 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA Continued... 4,200.36 461039 1080801072 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.30 461021 1080801073 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,744.83 461038 1080801114 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 226.20 461040 1080801115 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,206.93 460900 1080801116 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 563.74 460898 1080801117 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.30 460882 1080801118 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,256.50 460886 1080801119 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,316.46 460885 1080801120 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 121.80 460883 1080801121 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13,929.42 424739 5/24/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 4,966.60 461034 1090857221 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,706.50 460879 1090857222 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,652.05 460891 1090857223 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 127.75 460889 1090857224 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,264.27 461328 1090860206 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13,717.17 424740 5/24/2018 103239 BRIN GLASS CO. 1,291.52 TOM S WINDOW GLASS 461255 3034 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,291.52 424741 5/24/2018 121118 BRUESKE, JEFFREY 200.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 6/12/18 461245 CLP6/12/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 424742 5/24/2018 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 499.80 461144 27640 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 547.33 461143 27641 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 1,047.13 424743 5/24/2018 140319 BUBANY, MARY 14.20 BOOKS SOLD 461223 052118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 14.20 424744 5/24/2018 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 9 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424744 5/24/2018 100144 BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION Continued... 3,000.00 PRE-PAYACCOUNT 461157 TERRI 1556.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 3,000.00 424745 5/24/2018 140503 BURNSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 2,069.54 MN-TF1: BURNSVILLE, MULTIPLE 461087 051818C 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 2,069.54 424746 5/24/2018 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 250.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 6/14/18 461247 CLP 6/14/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 424747 5/24/2018 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 189.08 MERCHANDISE 460976 929113113 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 162.68 MERCHANDISE 460977 929121125 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 222.30 MERCHANDISE 460978 929126354 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 222.30 MERHANDISE 460979 929126358 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 591.98 MERCHANDISE 460980 929126380 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 369.68 MERCHANDISE 460981 929126382 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 375.08 MERCHANDISE 460985 929126383 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 375.08 MERCHANDISE 460982 929126384 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 692.44 MERCHANDISE 460990 929126386 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 190.58 MERCHANDISE 460983 929126389 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 66.02 DISPLAY 460984 929126390 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 217.80 MERCHANDISE 460991 929126391 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 101.70 MERCHANDISE 460992 929132346 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 631.80 MERCHANDISE 460993 929134084 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 96.08 MERCHANDISE 460994 929134085 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,424.94 MERCHANDISE 460995 929134087 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 90.86- CREDIT FOR INCORRECT MERCH 460998 929141033 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 141.50 MERCHANDISE 460996 929141855 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 217.80 MERCHANDISE 460997 929141856 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 6,197.98 424748 5/24/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 362.75 460877 2105331 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,521.35 460892 2105332 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 44.70 460894 2105333 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,009.50 461031 2105334 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 124.25 461032 2105657 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,038.35 461320 2108608 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 10 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 - Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424748 424749 5/24/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY Continued... 5/24/2018 9,100.90 618.38 MAIN BLDG HEAT 461276 5584304.9-5/18 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 31.99 FIRE TOWER HEAT 461277 584310.6-5/18 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 36.63 SIM FUEL 461279 590919.6-5/18 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 44.69 NEW CLASSROOM HEAT 461278 633418.8-5/18 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 731.69 424750 5/24/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 44.09 461306 6522-5/18 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 44.09 424751 5/24/2018 127227 CFA SOFTWARE INC. 2,995.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 461078 13794 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,995.00 424752 5/24/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 12.00 SHOP RAGS 461315 4005683441 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 11.78 UNIFORM RENTAL 461131 4005905952 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.92 RENTAL UNIFORM 461130 4005905978 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 37.84 RENTAL UNIFORM 461132 4005905987 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.30 RENTAL UNIFORM 461128 4005906005 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 34.60 LAUNDRY 461129 4005906006 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 15.36 RUG SERVICE 461218 4006061246 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 38.30 RENTAL UNIFORM 461292 4006097741 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.26 LAUNDRY 461294 4006097753 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 19.92 RENTAL UNIFORM 461295 4006097837 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 264.28 424753 5/24/2018 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 150.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 6/11/18 461242 CLP 6/11/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 424754 5/24/2018 129517 CITY OF EDINA - PUBLIC WORKS 168.00 INV. 23658, MN-TF1 TRUFUEL 461158 23658 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 168.00 424755 5/24/2018 114639 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 1,642.55 MN-TF1: SLP WAGES 461212 28183 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page - 11 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424755 5/24/2018 114639 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Continued... 1,642.55 424756 5/24/2018 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 8,781.16 MN-TF1: ST. PAUL LABOR/EQUIP 461100 IN00028296 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 8,781.16 424757 5/24/2018 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 237.00 MN DATA PRACTICES X3 461119 IN00028208 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 237.00 424758 5/24/2018 142476 CLURE, CAROL 167.31 REFUND 461093 120845 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 167.31 424759 5/24/2018 120433 COMCAST 29.02 460825 0220686-5/2018 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 29.02 424760 5/24/2018 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 5,044.81 461211 180515 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 5,044.81 424761 5/24/2018 135711 CONFLUENCE 5,835.21 GRANDVIEW GREEN RENDERINGS 461012 15526 9232.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 5,835.21 424762 5/24/2018 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 144.00 SILICONE CAULKING 461198 0169431-IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 144.00 424763 5/24/2018 142486 CORNELISON, PETER 210.00 REFUND 461210 00077230 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 210.00 424764 5/24/2018 142488 COWAN, ROBERT 61.04 REFUND 461329 00112259 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 61.04 424765 5/24/2018 137086 CRAFTSMEN HOME IMPROVEMENT 43.53 APP FEE - WRONG PERMIT 461264 163287 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 12 Business Unit 424765 5/24/2018 137086 CRAFTSMEN HOME IMPROVEMENT Continued... 43.53 424766 5/24/2018 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 538.13 AC 60TH MAGNETS 460819 60771 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 538.13 424767 5/24/2018 103833 CROW-HASSAN NURSERY L.L.C. 2,800.00 TREES 460919 3255 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,800.00 424768 5/24/2018 130169 CUSTOM BUSINESS FORMS 1,027.00 JUNE NEWSLETTER 461326 314943 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 1,027.00 424769 5/24/2018 133169 DAIKIN APPLIED 892.33 POOL HEAT ACTUATOR FAILED 460824 3178513 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 892.33 424770 5/24/2018 140322 DEESE, BARBARA 28.40 BOOK SALES 461222 052118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 28.40 424771 5/24/2018 101644 DICK BLICK COMPANY 25.20 SUPPLIES 461118 216524 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 25.20 424772 5/24/2018 121103 DIRECTV 101.51 TV 461274 34195784636 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 101.51 424773 5/24/2018 124438 DONNAY HOMES 2,500.00 6613 PARKWOOD RD DEMO ESCROW 461263 161126 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 424774 5/24/2018 140501 EAGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT 210.00 MN-TF1: UQT3 EAGAN 461085 051818A 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 210.00 424775 5/24/2018 103594 EDINALARM INC. 343.07 SECURITY SYSTEM-CLUBHOUSE 461104 31567 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page - 13 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 — Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424775 424776 5/24/2018 103594 EDINALARM INC. 142473 ELWOOD, DENNIS C Continued... 5/24/2018 343.07 1,563.42 AMB REF 45962144 461090 51518 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,563.42 424777 5/24/2018 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC. 4,059.90 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 461006 1987130 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 165.75 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 461005 1987817 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,225.65 424778 5/24/2018 117483 ENGELE, LEE 200.00 CLFM PERFORMANCE 6/14/18 461244 CLFM 6/14/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 424779 5/24/2018 142506 ENGLER, ANNE 72.00 SUPER 6/7 REFUND 461286 052118 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARKADMIN. GENERAL 72.00 424780 5/24/2018 142481 ER, ONCU 134.05 REFUND 461205 00121814 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 134.05 424781 5/24/2018 142492 ERDAHL JR, ALBERT 24.69 REFUND 461333 00086143 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 24.69 424782 5/24/2018 142497 ESTATE OF MARJORIE HUGHES 15.07 REFUND 461336 00086049 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 15.07 424783 5/24/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 644.52 BATTERIES 461175 1-Z14493 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 644.52 424784 5/24/2018 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 106.16 FASTENERS 461173 MNTC2152517 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 106.16 424785 5/24/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 14 Business Unit 424785 5/24/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS Continued... 1,816.24 METER 461083 0279416 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 1,816.24 424786 5/24/2018 141881 FIDELITY SECURITY LIFE 1,383.88 VISION MAY INVOICE 461235 1975778 9900.2033.27 VISION INS PAYROLL CLEARING 1,383.88 424787 5/24/2018 142456 FIRST SERVICE 1,329.98 LR JBENCHES 460832 1805023 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,329.98 424788 5/24/2018 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 645.00 PW WINDOW CLEANING 461257 2315-25885 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 645.00 424789 5/24/2018 137685 FORTERRA PIPE & PRECAST 3,292.50 STRUCTURES FOR BISCAYNE 461082 ST00006057 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,292.50 424790 5/24/2018 137554 FRED HOLASEK & SON INC. 3,459.30 PLANTS AND FLOWERS 461170 00020040 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 3,459.30 424791 5/24/2018 136271 FREELAND, MELISSA 160.00 TRAVELIN TEENS REFUND 461283 052218 1600.4390.31 TRAVELIN TEENS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 160.00 424792 5/24/2018 142024 FSSOLUTIONS 127.50 461088 FL00212342 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 127.50 424793 5/24/2018 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 659.24 MERCHANDISE 460974 41486280 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 659.24 424794 5/24/2018 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 150.00 BASKETBALL CHAMP SHIRTS 461186 93988 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 102.10 SKATING SUPPLIES 461219 94207 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 252.10 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 15 Business Unit 424795 5/24/2018 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 222.06 PUMP 460869 9784681018 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 74.14 TORCH AND LIGHTER 461124 9788850031 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.76 MAGNETS 461126 9789413136 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.64 STROBE LIGHT 461181 9792151244 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.00 SUNSCREEN 461284 9792467582 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 22.96 SUNSCREEN 461284 9792467582 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10.00 SUNSCREEN 461284 9792467582 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 430.56 424796 5/24/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,115.50 461027 39667 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,299.25 460909 MN00039668 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,414.75 424797 5/24/2018 140010 GROUP HEALTH INC.-WORKSITE 371.00 APRIL EAP INVOICE 461230 W814844 1556.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 371.00 424798 5/24/2018 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 65.00 REPAIR HANDLE 461044 4-325777 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 65.00 424799 5/24/2018 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 250.00 CLP 6/5/18 461238 CLP 6/5/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 424800 5/24/2018 142479 HARRIS, JOAN 8.74 REFUND 461203 00089808 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 8.74 424801 5/24/2018 142472 HARVEY, RUTH N 1,656.99 AMB REF 45145481 461089 51418 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,656.99 424802 5/24/2018 141531 HASTINGS FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,153.42 MN-TF1: UQT3 HASTINGS FIRE 461086 051818B 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,153.42 424803 5/24/2018 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,127.29 WATER CHEMICALS 461252 4281882 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 16 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424803 5/24/2018 100797 HAWKINS INC. Continued... 2,722.40 WATER CHEMICALS 461253 4281888 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,849.69 424804 5/24/2018 142480 HEINMILLER, JOSEPH 155.00 REFUND 461204 00119103 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 155.00 424805 5/24/2018 106371 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 3,400.00 EMT FOR 8 OFFICERS 461103 55892 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,400.00 424806 5/24/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 1,471.50 APRIL ROOM & BOARD 461228 1000110561 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 1,471.50 424807 5/24/2018 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 1,499.66 DENFELD WORKSTATION 461112 643557 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 1,499.66 424808 5/24/2018 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 496.75 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 461163 52892509 1470.6510 FIRSTAID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 175.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 461019 53376711 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 671.75 424809 5/24/2018 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 34.68 SWITCH FOR BACKPACK VAC 460835 700333387 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 34.68 424810 5/24/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,571.00 461033 963541 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,258.50 460893 963542 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,138.40 460878 963543 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,244.00 461327 964926 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,211.90 424811 5/24/2018 142489 HOPPENRATH, CAROLINE 10.42 REFUND 461330 00087513 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 10.42 424812 5/24/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 17 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424812 5/24/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC Continued... 13.04 HARDWARE 461007 038044200 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.31 FILTER 461178 038045446 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 143.84 BRAKES 461177 038045517 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 159.19 424813 5/24/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 155.62 460907 63968 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 159.13 461026 63970 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 314.75 424814 5/24/2018 142335 INTEGRAL ADVISORS, INC 1,500.00 460986 688 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 1,500.00 424815 5/24/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,630.93 460904 2809146 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,325.40 461025 2809149 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 130.60 BEER 461105 2838958 5420.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CLUB HOUSE 5,086.93 424816 5/24/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 3,289.18 460895 01004397 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.62 460890 1004377 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 38.19 460962 1009946 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 233.63 460959 1009947 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 125.23 461071 1009949 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 687.29 460958 1009950 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 209.18 460957 1009951 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 486.77 460956 1009952 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 602.38 461064 1009953 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,839.44 460955 1009954 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,072.15 460954 1009955 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 220.56 461072 1009969 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,717.49 461063 1009970 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,443.33 461068 1009971 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,489.16 461060 1009972 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,249.86 461065 1009973 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 170.38 461070 1009974 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,239.73 461067 1009975 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 41.66- 460960 679054 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 18 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424816 5/24/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. Continued... 47.70- 460961 679237 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 55.49- 460963 679238 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24,970.72 424817 5/24/2018 142490 JOHNSON, ANDREW 70.00 REFUND 461331 00119855 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 70.00 424818 5/24/2018 142493 JOHNSON, RICHARD 100.62 REFUND 461334 00087563 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 100.62 424819 5/24/2018 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 295.00 STA. 1 BOILER REPAIR 460967 1145675 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 295.00 424820 5/24/2018 141864 JOSEPH E JOHNSON & SONS CONSTRUCTION 12,732.50 DOME DOOR REPLACEMENT AND REPA 461138 1021 5550.1720 BUILDINGS SPORTS DOME BALANCE SHEET 12,732.50 424821 5/24/2018 102080 KATTREH, ANN 590.79 MILEAGE JANUARY -APRIL 2018 461322 051718 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 590.79 424822 5/24/2018 142478 KHANNA, GOPAL 383.46 REFUND 461202 00078435 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND, UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 383.46 424823 5/24/2018 136686 KIDCREATE STUDIO 132.00 PLAYDATE WITH MOM 460816 8866 1630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS 132.00 424824 5/24/2018 105730 KJOS, PHIL 125.00 PIANO TUNING 461324 051618 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 125.00 424825 5/24/2018 142485 KSCIELAK, JOSEPH 66.87 REFUND 461209 00114616 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 66.87 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 19 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424826 5/24/2018 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS Continued... 167.50 TOW VEHICLE 461110 81596 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 167.50 424827 5/24/2018 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 150.00 TOWING FEE 461195 81685 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 150.00 424828 5/24/2018 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 175.00 TOWING FEE 461196 17909 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 175.00 424829 5/24/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 177.43 NUTS, SCREWS 461114 9305814496 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 695.68 TERMINALS, NUTS, FITTINGS 461180 93058287/11 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 482.70 WASHERS, SCREWS, DRILL BITS 461182 93058287/12 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 1,355.81 424830 5/24/2018 104670 LAWYER NURSERY INC. 401.23 TREES 461161 10156238 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 401.23 424831 5/24/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 925.00 MN-TF1: JPA LIABILITY INSURANC 461101 40002183 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 925.00 424832 5/24/2018 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 494.89 MAY ACC AND CI INVOICE 461232 C1960620/5-2018 9900.2033.28 ACCIDENT AND CRITICAL INS PAYROLL CLEARING 494.89 424833 5/24/2018 102464 LIGHTING PLASTICS OF MINNESOTA INC. 184.80 PLASTIC BELL STREET LIGHTS 461194 INV80939 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 184.80 424834 5/24/2018 136027 LINA 4,659.38 MAY LTD INVOICE 461231 416005118000005 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 0118181211 4,659.38 424835 5/24/2018 141434 LUBE TECH 342.00 CAR WASH DRYING AGENT 461010 103782 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 20 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 — Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424835 5/24/2018 141434 LUBE TECH Continued_ 342.00 424836 5/24/2018 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 99.00 460966 12282 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 99.00 424837 5/24/2018 129657 M.S. INDUSTRIES INC. 729.50 461270 218668 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 729.50 424838 5/24/2018 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 661.18 CONTRACTED REPAIR 461009 W02568 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 661.18 424839 5/24/2018 142491 MAPLE PARTNERS LLC 146.00 REFUND 461332 00120883 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 146.00 424840 5/24/2018 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 83.27 CARBON DIOXIDE 461162 17587641 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 83.27 424841 5/24/2018 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 70.00 PHONE SUPPORT 461117 210994 1554.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 70.00 424842 5/24/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 162.70 PROGRAM KEY 461176 332856 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 162.70 424843 5/24/2018 142482 MEYER, CAROLYN 114.83 REFUND 461206 00076140 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 114.83 424844 5/24/2018 102769 MILLER, TOM 693.00 LESSONS 5/3-5/16/18 461109 51718 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 693.00 424845 5/24/2018 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER 2,210.00 SL LEAK REPAIR 461079 35646 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page - 21 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 4 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424845 5/24/2018 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & WATER Continued... 2,380.00 6104 ASHCROFT SL REPAIR 461251 35647 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 4,590.00 424846 5/24/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,241.00 461321 1270011-5/18 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22,241.00 424847 5/24/2018 101966 MINNESOTA SYMPHONIC WINDS 150.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 6/13/18 461246 CLP 6/13/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 424848 5/24/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 387.00 RACK CARDS 461183 25198 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 387.00 424849 5/24/2018 132597 MIXMI BRANDS LLC 48.00 FROZEN YOGURT 460830 3191 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 48.00 424850 5/24/2018 140948 MOHAGEN / HANSEN ARCHITECTURAL GROUP 29,281.69 NORTH RAMP EXP-ARCHITECT 461258 42826 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 29,281.69 424851 5/24/2018 102776 MRPA 195.00 MRPA BANQUET 461215 9112 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENAADMINISTRATION 195.00 424852 5/24/2018 105595 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. - USE 100906 166.60 REPAIR PARTS - FUEL PUMP 461151 1164722-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 166.60 424853 5/24/2018 104671 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING LLC 201,194.00 COURTNEY FIELD #1 LIGHTS 461139 308983 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 201,194.00 424854 5/24/2018 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 31.99 VALVE 461011 2122-330147 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.99 424855 5/24/2018 103665 NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF EMERGENCY DISPATCH R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page - 22 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424855 5/24/2018 103665 NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF EMERGENCY DISPATCH Continued... 50.00 LUKE PRICE EMD RECERT 461018 SIN110347 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 50.00 424856 5/24/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 627.50 461028 131356 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 179.00 460906 131357 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 806.50 424857 5/24/2018 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 181.07 DATE STICKERS FOR SIGNS 461184 TRFINV002031 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 181.07 424858 5/24/2018 132620 NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT 18,927.50 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 461017 2018-04RJA 9240.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT 18,927.50 424859 5/24/2018 131740 NISSEN, DIETRICH 169.50 DIETRICH EDINA MILEAGE 461153 MAR-MAY 2018 1130.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 50.14 DIETRICH SWTV MILEAGE 461154 MAY 2018 1132.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CABLE COMMISSION 219.64 424860 5/24/2018 105672 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC. 13.82 FILTERS 460867 282391 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 13.82 424861 5/24/2018 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 89.30 SKATE SHOW BLACK PAPER 460818 131160555001 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 67.57 CLOCK, TAPE 461314 132364295001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 156.87 424862 5/24/2018 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 10.80 LANGUAGE LINE IN BOOKING 461141 W18040635 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.80 424863 5/24/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 255.60 WORK GLOVES 461042 619100 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 255.60 424864 5/24/2018 101659 ORKIN 24.20 RAMP PEST CONTROL 461074 170170479 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page - 23 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424864 5/24/2018 101659 ORKIN Continued... 24.20 RAMP PEST CONTROL 461075 170171435 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 48.40 424865 5/24/2018 104916 PAINTERS GEAR INC. 777.20 SM PAINT SPRAYER KIT 461200 45603 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 330.63 PAINT SPRAYER GUNS 461199 45893 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1,107.83 424866 5/24/2018 142437 PATRICK DORN CONSTRUCTION 3,200.00 DAMAGE TO PLAZA 461013 1548 9210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT HRAADMINISTRATION 3,200.00 424867 5/24/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 116.25 460899 11125 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,411.40 461023 11126 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 176.50 461022 11127 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,277.20 460884 11128 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,981.35 424868 5/24/2018 142483 PECKHAM, JOHN 160.00 REFUND 461207 00090893 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 160.00 424869 5/24/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 1,327.74 CONCESSIONS FOOD 461115 47878869 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 430.75 PEPSI 460999 50582006 5420.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CLUB HOUSE 1,758.49 424870 5/24/2018 138081 PETERSON SALT & WATER TREATMENT 81.00 SALT - ST. 1 461003 158006 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 27.00 SALT - ST. 2 461004 158007 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 108.00 424871 5/24/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 19.19 460953 2358290 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 628.09 460952 2358291 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,933.75 460951 2358292 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,198.14 461069 2358300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,490.43 461058 2358301 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8,269.60 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page - 24 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 — Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424871 424872 5/24/2018 5/24/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 100953 PHYSIO-CONTROL INC. Continued... 15,805.93 CPR LUCAS FOR 4TH AMBULANCE 461102 118036259 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 15,805.93 424873 5/24/2018 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 46.68 PEST CONTROL 461050 5928901 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.68 424874 5/24/2018 142507 PODRATZ, MOLLY 54.00 REVSPORTS REFUND 461287 052218 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 54.00 424875 5/24/2018 138292 PRECISE IRRIGATION 1,551.94 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 461051 2196 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 275.78 IRRIGATION REPAIR 461052 2199 5761.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,827.72 424876 5/24/2018 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 40.14 WATER 460827 622833-04-18 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 40.14 424877 5/24/2018 135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT 648.00 DOME TAKEDOWN FORKLIFT 460860 R22335 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 648.00 424878 5/24/2018 104643 RECREATION SUPPLY COMPANY 1,471.26 GOGGLES/POOL TOYS 461159 339803 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,471.26 424879 5/24/2018 142498 RECTOR, CHARLES 160.00 REFUND 461337 00116662 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 160.00 424880 5/24/2018 142471 RICH, ANDREA 728.01 GFOA REIM 461098 GFOA 2018 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 728.01 424881 5/24/2018 140922 RICHARDS, BRIAN 250.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 6/7/18 461241 CLP 6/7/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 25 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 — Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424881 5/24/2018 140922 RICHARDS, BRIAN Continued... 250.00 424882 5/24/2018 134832 RICHFIELD BLACKTOP & CONCRETE 2,300.00 461249 3904 04432.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Concord A/G 2,300.00 424883 5/24/2018 108659 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 6/6/18 461240 CLP 6/6/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 100.00 424884 5/24/2018 139927 ROCHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT 1,244.83 MN-TFI:ROCHESTER FIRE 461099 051818D 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 1,244.83 424885 5/24/2018 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 250.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 6/12/18 461243 CLP 6/12/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 250.00 424886 5/24/2018 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 93.54 461317 18-02516 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 93.54 424887 5/24/2018 139439 RUE 38 LLC 243.00 461318 3313 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 243.00 424888 5/24/2018 117099 SAFETY SIGNS 4,050.00 TRAFIC CONTROL 461095 0117305-IN 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 4,050.00 424889 5/24/2018 142474 SAIGN, ETHEL MARIAN 90.04 AMB REF 46039481 461091 51518 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 90.04 424890 5/24/2018 142496 SCHLAEFER, PAUL 26.10 REFUND 461335 00081536 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 26.10 424891 5/24/2018 140902 SCHULZ, JILANE 124.00 SKYHAWKS REFUND 461226 052218 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page - 26 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 — Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424891 424892 5/24/2018 140902 SCHULZ, JILANE 100995 SEH Continued... 5/24/2018 124.00 4,155.42 PED CROSSING UPDATE 461250 349224 1262.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION 11,933.40 461116 350053 05572.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-572 RAW WM WELL 21 TO VVTP 16,088.82 424893 5/24/2018 142508 SEWARD, JULIE 40.00 PLAYGROUND AND TENNIS REFUND 461288 052218 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 60.00 PLAYGROUND AND TENNIS REFUND 461288 052218 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 100.00 424894 5/24/2018 103249 SHANNON, JIM 150.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 6/5/18 461239 CLP 6/5/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 150.00 424895 5/24/2018 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 1,413.00 CRIME ANALYST SOFTWARE 460861 808182687 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,413.00 424896 5/24/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 20.68 COMPRESSOR SIGNS 461055 12945 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 282.00 SIGNS 461168 12955 5760.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 302.68 424897 5/24/2018 137482 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 169.77 SPRAYER 461147 65831427 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 91.87 IRRIGATION REPAIR COURTNEY 461149 85861124 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 261.64 424898 5/24/2018 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 106.89 HAMMER, RATCHETS 461179 ARV/36190697 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 106.89 424899 5/24/2018 142467 SOMERSET COUNTRY CLUB 1,500.00 GROW-IN CUSHMAN GA-60 460968 646302 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,500.00 424900 5/24/2018 117819 SOUTH OF THE RIVER COMMUNITY BAND 50.00 6.3.18 CONCERT 461236 CLP6318 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page- 27 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No 5/24/2018 - Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424900 424901 5/24/2018 117819 SOUTH OF THE RIVER COMMUNITY BAND 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 5/24/2018 50.00 812.80 461291 1672126 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,138.80 461290 1677603 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 267.73 460901 1682807 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,225.12 460903 1682808 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 243.20 460902 1682809 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 260.80 460896 1682810 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 315.20 460897 1682811 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 80.00 460888 1682812 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,751.22 460887 1682813 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 272.40 460881 1682814 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,195.80 460880 1682815 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,598.30 461036 1682816 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,670.17 461037 1682817 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,210.40 461035 1682818 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 278.80 461024 1682819 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 278.80 461047 1684116 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .80 461046 1684117 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,508.80 461309 1684121 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,925.00 461296 5028957 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 35,034.14 424902 5/24/2018 103273 SOUTHSIDE BIG BAND 200.00 CLP PERFORMANCE 461237 CLP6/4/18 5760.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC-OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 200.00 424903 5/24/2018 130091 SPARTINA 449 LLC 93.11 DISPLAY PIECE 460975 IN70126 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 93.11 424904 5/24/2018 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 18,526.42 NORTH RAMP - OWNERS REP 461259 10930.00-8 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 939.50 2017 BUDGET 461135 11329.00-1 1262.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION 19,465.92 424905 5/24/2018 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 681.84 GARBAGE CAN LID 460918 19733 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 681.84 R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Council Check Register by GL Page - 28 Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO it Doc No 5/24/2018 — Inv No 5/24/2018 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424905 424906 5/24/2018 5/24/2018 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC Continued... 298.00 461073 21462 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 298.00 424907 5/24/2018 135803 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6,375.00 MAY LIFE INS -ACTIVES 461233 237716-001/5-20 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 18 211.70 MAY LIFE INS - NONACTIVES 461234 237716-901/5-20 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 18 6,586.70 424908 5/24/2018 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 727.72 CONCESSION PRODUCT 460828 147838995 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 727.72 424909 5/24/2018 104932 TAYLOR MADE 301.19 MERCHANDISE 460973 33177581 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 306.08 MERCHANDISE 460972 33188153 5400.1356 INVENTORY SUPPLIES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 607.27 424910 5/24/2018 112362 TEAM LAB 2,442.50 LIFT STATION CLEANER 461080 INV0010953 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 2,442.50 424911 5/24/2018 122768 TEE TIMES PRESS 225.00 TEE TIME MAGAZINE-JUNIOR AD 460969 24484 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 250.00 ADVERTISING 461169 24495 5760.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 475.00 424912 5/24/2018 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 807.25 FLAGSTICKS/SUPPLIES 460970 S270449-IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 807.25 424913 5/24/2018 142465 THE ARBITRAGE GROUP INC 750.00 ARBITRAGE 2009A BONDS 460987 82099 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 750.00 ARBITRAGE 2009C BONDS 460988 82101 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENAADMINISTRATION 1,500.00 424914 5/24/2018 142475 THOMAS, TRICIA R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page - 29 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424914 5/24/2018 142475 THOMAS, TRICIA Continued... 225.00 PAYMENT FOR EP YOGA CLASS 461092 51618 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 225.00 424915 5/24/2018 120700 TIGER OAK MEDIA 305.00 ADVERTISING 461123 2018-187630 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 305.00 424916 5/24/2018 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 82.06 WELDING GAS 461174 23600 10244091 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.00 BALLOON FILLER 461280 23600 10244407 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 87.06 424917 5/24/2018 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 219.53 PRINTER 461273 68367236 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 219.53 424918 5/24/2018 142455 TRACER ELECTRONICS, LLC 1,311.00 METAL LOCATOR 461081 107267 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 1,311.00 424919 5/24/2018 142484 TURNER, CAROL A 150.00 REFUND 461208 00081899 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 150.00 424920 5/24/2018 142505 TWIN CITIES SISTERS IN CRIME 196.98 ARTWORK SOLD 461285 052118 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 196.98 424921 5/24/2018 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 121.00 SEED AND MULCH 461045 42083 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 287.50 SEED AND PEN MULCH 461041 42123 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 330.35 461269 42296 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 738.85 424922 5/24/2018 131957 UNIVERSAL ATHLETIC BOZEMAN 455.00 STAFF SUPPLIES 461217 150-0036962 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 338.00 STAFF SUPPLIES 461216 150-0036965 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 793.00 424923 5/24/2018 141397 UPTOWN PLUMBING HEATING & COOLING R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 30 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424923 5/24/2018 141397 UPTOWN PLUMBING HEATING & COOLING Continued... 234.10 80% PERMIT FEE REFUND 461262 ED163200 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 234.10 424924 5/24/2018 140954 URBAN GROWLER BREWING COMPANY LLC 264.00 461076 E-20958 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 264.00 424925 5/24/2018 139818 US HEALTHWORKS 115.00 461227 0084933-MN 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 115.00 424926 5/24/2018 141927 VER-TECH LABS 2,850.00 SOAP 461096 NV000015508 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,850.00 424927 5/24/2018 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 538.92 LED RETRO LAMPS 460914 S001361025.001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 538.92- LED RETRO LAMPS 460913 5001361025.002 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,255.00 REPLACEMENT POLES 461254 S001374951.002 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 22.95 CORD CONNECTOR 460916 S001511742.001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 82.84 HANDHOLE COVER 461137 S001520799.001 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 653.20 UNDERGROUND TAPS 461136 S001527157.001 1321.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 4,013.99 424928 5/24/2018 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 691.25 461142 3136806 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 691.25 424929 5/24/2018 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 199.45 CONCESSIONS FOOD 461214 106201 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 199.45 424930 5/24/2018 141052 WALLIN, LYNETTE 880.00 SIT FIT INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 461323 SPRING 2018 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 880.00 424931 5/24/2018 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 200.00 WASHINGTON COUNTY WARRANT 461248 20180521RK 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 R55CKR2 Check # LOGIS101 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page - 31 Business Unit 424932 5/24/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN Continued... 88.57 FS2 461084 40437-2808-0 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 125.91 FS1 461084 40437-2808-0 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 231.60 SEN CTR 461084 40437-2808-0 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 353.06 CITY HALL 461084 40437-2808-0 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 498.86 ROSLAND PARK 461084 40437-2808-0 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 717.20 PW MAINT 461084 40437-2808-0 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 717.20 PW BLDG 461084 40437-2808-0 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 93.49 ART CENTER 461084 40437-2808-0 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 181.72 GOLF DOME 461084 40437-2808-0 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 116.95 CLUB HOUSE 461084 40437-2808-0 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 141.45 BRAEMAR MAINT 461084 40437-2808-0 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,624.43 ARENA TRASH 461084 40437-2808-0 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,719.04 EDINBOU 461084 40437-2808-0 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 107.89 GV LID 461084 40437-2808-0 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 171.12 YORK LID 461084 40437-2808-0 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 6,888.49 424933 5/24/2018 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 1,605.35 FUEL 461152 46041 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,605.35 424934 5/24/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 74.13 460949 7183599 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,674.23 460950 7183600 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,143.35 461059 7183603 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,891.71 424935 5/24/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 1,243.68 461297 589836680 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 38.70 461299 590124159 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.74 461308 590206582 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,047.93 461308 590206582 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,253.87 461308 590206582 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,421.88 461308 590206582 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 396.33 461298 590283087 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 3,420.25 461300 590385204 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 47.79 461301 590590418 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 3,262.75 461303 590948474 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 461.94 461302 590964400 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 460.04 461304 591132522 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKR2 LOGIS101 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 5/24/2018 — 5/24/2018 5/23/2018 10:30:30 Page- 32 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424935 5/24/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY Continued... 1,264.38 461305 591498413 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 6,031.55 461307 592194754 5915.6185 LIGHT & POWER WATER TREATMENT 20,386.83 424936 5/24/2018 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 2,137.72 CONTRACTED REPAIR 461097 17993 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,137.72 424937 5/24/2018 142509 ZHANG, YAN 70.00 VOLLEYBALL ASSOC. REFUND 461293 052218 1600.4390.69 PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS PARKADMIN. GENERAL 70.00 424938 5/24/2018 101531 ZINN, JUDY 185.38 JEWELRY SUPPLY REIMBURSMENT 461229 052218 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 185.38 784,896.54 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 745,730.03 39,166.51 784,896.54 R55CKS2 LOGIS100 CITY OF EDINA 5/23/2018 10:30:36 Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. Council Check Summary Page- 1 5/24/2018 - 5/24/2018 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 357,175.11 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 375.00 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 750.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 3,311.15 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,499.66 05100 ART CENTER FUND 848.65 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 181.72 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 2,584.22 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 18,063.64 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 21,066.24 05550 SPORTS DOME FUND 13,380.50 05700 EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 6,511.98 05750 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 9,441.30 05800 LIQUOR FUND 155,803.49 05900 UTILITY FUND 66,993.83 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 7,622.49 06000 RISK MGMT ISF 211.70 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,516.89 07500 MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 16,194.50 09210 HRAADMINISTRATION 3,200.00 09232 CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 66,323.82 09240 PENTAGON PARK DISTRICT 18,927.50 09900 PAYROLL FUND 12,913.15 Report Totals 784,896.54 Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.C . To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:S econd Amendment to R edevelopment Agreement with Edina Market S treet, LLC Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion approving the second amendment to the Redevelopment Agreement. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T his item pertains to the 2017 R edevelopment Agreement with the co-developers of the Nolan Mains/Center R amp project. An amendment is necessary to clarify the cost-sharing arrangement for the valet parking and the parking management. T he developer will pay 22% of valet and management costs to address the basic need. T he H R A will cover 78% of costs to improve business conditions during the nine-month construction period. AT TAC HME N T S: Description 2nd Amendment: Edina Market Street LLC SECOND AMENDMENT to REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT by and among THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, and EDINA MARKET STREET LLC Dated as of May PO4 , 2018 THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP 50 South Sixth Street, Suite 1500 Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 4835-1551-3701\2 SECOND AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made and entered into this day of May, 2018 ("Second Amendment Effective Date"), among the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota statutory city (the "City"), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Authority") and EDINA MARKET STREET LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company ("Developer") (together, the "Parties"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the City, the Authority and Developer are parties to a Redevelopment Agreement dated June 27, 2017, as amended by First Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement dated December 19, 2017 (collectively, the "Redevelopment Agreement") and all capitalized telins used in this Amendment shall have the meaning given them in the Redevelopment Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to amend the Redevelopment Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual obligations of the Parties hereto, each of them does hereby covenant and agree with the other as follows: 1. Valet Parking. The following is hereby added at the end of Section 5.10 of the Redevelopment Agreement: "Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 5.10, the following provisions shall control as of the Second Amendment Effective Date and any of the provisions of Section 5.10 not inconsistent with the following shall remain in full force and effect after the Second Amendment Effective Date: As of the Second Amendment Effective Date, the City has hired and holds the contracts for (i) a parking management service to oversee public parking operations in the Project Area and (ii) a valet parking service to provide the valet services described in Section 5.10. The City shall continue to hold and manage such contracts and service providers through the substantial completion of the North Ramp Improvements (anticipated to be on or about September 30, 2018). Each such service provider will be a reputable vendor who is mutually acceptable to the City and Developer Developer shall be responsible for 22% of all costs incurred by the City or Developer for such parking management services and such valet parking services, including miscellaneous costs, such as signage and banners, related to the valet parking, for the period from January 1, 2018 through September 30, 2018. The City shall be responsible for the remaining 78% of all such costs and 100% of such costs incurred after September 30, 2018. For such costs incurred by either 4835-1551-370112 party prior to the Second Amendment Effective Date, Developer and the City shall reconcile such costs and reimburse each other as necessary based on the foregoing 22%/78% cost allocation and actual invoices and other documentation of such costs. Following the Second Amendment Effective Date, Developer shall reimburse. the City for Developer's share of actual costs incurred on a monthly basis upon presentation of invoices and other documentation of such costs. Any increase or decrease in the level or hours of valet service must be mutually agreed upon. Developer shall continue to be solely responsible for the cost of securing the off-site parking at Mercy Covenant Church in accordance with this Section 5.10." 2. Entire Agreement. Except as herein amended, other terms and provisions of the Development Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. 3. Ratification. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Redevelopment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 4. Binding Effect. This Amendment amends and supplements the Redevelopment Agreement. If there is a conflict between the provisions of the Redevelopment Agreement and this Amendment, the provisions of this Amendment shall control. This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the City, the Authority, Developer, and their respective successors and assigns. 5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile or email copies shall be deemed originals. [SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] 2 4835-1551-3701\2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City, the Authority and Developer have caused this Amendment to be duly executed in their names and on their behalf, all on or as of the date first above written. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: Mayor By: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by James B. Hovland and Scott Neal, the Mayor and City Manager respectively, of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of the City of Edina. Notary Public [Signature Page to Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement] 4835-1551-3701\2 By: )'l)116/fAi Secretary HOUSING AN 1 REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I I THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOT B • air Reviewed and Approved: Scott H. Neal Executive Director I VA The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this all day of , 2018, by James B. Hovland and Robert Stewart, the Chair and Secretary respec , of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on behalf of said Authority. SHARON M. ALLISON Notary Public-Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2020 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) [Signature Page to Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement] 4835-1551-3701\2 EDINA MARKET STREET LLC a Minnesota limited liability company By: Edina Market Street Manager LLC a Minnesota limited liability company Its: Managing Member By: Peter Deanovic Its: Chief Executive Officer STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2018, by Peter Deanovic, the Chief Executive Officer of Edina Market Street Manager LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, the Managing Member of Edina Market Street LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the limited liability company. Notary Public [Signature Page to Amendment to Redevelopment Agreement] 48354551-3701\2 Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.D. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Bill Neuendorf, Economic Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:R es olution 2018-49: S upporting Affordably-P riced Housing at 4100 Wes t 76th S treet and R eceptivity to Metropolitan C ounc il F unding Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion to acknowledge the C ity's receptivity of a Livable Communities Act Award and to authorize the C ommunity D evelopment D irector and City Manager to implement the award should the application be funded.. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T his item pertains to a funding request to the Metropolitan Council for new affordably-priced housing located at 4100 West 76th Street. Aeon, a non-profit developer has site control and is seeking funding from a variety of sources in hopes of constructing a new apartment building in 2019. T he Metropolitan Council requires local municipalities to acknowledge their receptivity to grant funding if awarded through a competitive process. P lease note that this acknowledgement pertains to financing only. T he developer is still required to go through the C ity's standard development review process. T he execution of this form does not waive the developers responsibility to secure rezoning and entitlements for the potential project. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Resolution 2018-49 Aeon Support Receptivity of LCA Award Form - Edina Aeon RESOLUTION NO. 2018-49 SUPPORTING AFFORDABLY-PRICED HOUSING AT 4100 WEST 76TH STREET AND RECEPTIVITY TO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL FUNDING BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: WHEREAS, as a participant in the Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities Local Housing Incentives Account program , the City of Edina supports the affordable and life-cycle objectives of the Livable Communities Act (LCA), and, WHEREAS, Aeon, a Minnesota Nonprofit Corporation, is applying through a Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Request for Proposal (RFP) for affordable housing funds that could include Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities Local Housing Incentives Account (LCA) program funds for its proposed affordable housing development at 4100 West 76th Street in Edina: THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that, accordingly, the City of Edina will accept and make available in a timely manner to Aeon, any LCA award to the City to assist the housing program or activity proposed at 4100 West 76th Street, if such an award is made. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Edina, by its acknowledgement to being receptive to LCA program funds for this project, has no obligation to the Metropolitan Council or to Aeon, to approve any land use, permitting or any other current or future request related to any current or future proposed development of 4100 West 76th Street by Aeon. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Council authorizes the City Manager to sign the attached Acknowledgement of Receptivity to a Metropolitan Council LCA Funding Award form on behalf of the Council. Adopted by the Edina City Council this 5th day of June, 2018. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 5, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of the City this ___________ day of ___________________, 20________. ___________________________________ City Clerk ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEPTIVITY OF A METROPOLITAN COUNCIL LCA FUNDING AWARD The ______________________________ (“Grantee”) agrees to accept and make available in a timely manner to (city/township, county, development authority) the Request for Proposal (RFP) Applicant, ___________________________, any Local Housing Incentives Account (LHIA) award to the Grantee to assist the housing development or activity proposed in this application, if such an award is made, and to provide the funding match as required by state statute. The Grantee certifies that the housing development, for which the application is submitted, is located in _______________________, which is a (city/township) participant in the Metropolitan Council’s Livable Communities LHIA program. By: ________________________________________ (Authorized City Official) PROPOSED PROJECT INFORMATION (Required for grant contracting purposes) PROJECT INFORMATION 4100 Apartments Project Name 4100 76th Street West Project Address Edina Project City Street boundaries or major intersections: France Avenue South and 76th Street West PROJECT STAFF CONTACT INFORMATION Aubrie Gould Contact Name 901 N. 3rd Street, Suite 150 Address Minneapolis City 55401 Zipcode (612) 746-0537 ____________________________ _ Phone Number (612) 341-4208 Fax Number agould@aeonmn.org E-mail address GRANTEE (CITY/TOWNSHIP, HOUSING/DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY) CONTACT INFORMATION _____________________________ Contact Name _______________ Title ______________ Phone _________________________ E-mail Address Signature GRANTEE’S “AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL” CONTACT INFORMATION _____________________________ Name _______________ Title ______________ Phone _________________________ E-mail Address Signature City of Edina Edina Cary Teague Director of Community Development 952-826-0460 cteague@EdinaMN.gov Scott Neal City Manager SNeal@EdinaMN.gov952-927-8861 Aeon Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.E. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk Item Activity: Subject:R es olution No. 2018-52: Authorizing Edina Liquor O n-S ale Distillery F or C haritable Event June 25, 2018 at C entennial Lakes Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion to adopt R esolution No. 2018-52 granting Edina L iquor a temporary dispensary to serve on-sale intoxicating liquor during a fundraising event at Centennial L akes on J une 25, 2018. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he Southdale Y M C A is hosting a fundraising event at Centennial L akes on Monday J une 25, 2018. Fulton B rewery is providing alcohol for the event and Edina L iquor will do the serving. T his is the same event the C ouncil authorized the temporary distillery for Edina L iquor in 2017. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Resolution No. 2018-52 Temporary Dis pens ary RESOLUTION 2017-52 ESTABLISHING TEMPORARY ON-SALE MUNICIPAL DISPENSARY FOR EDINA LIQUOR DURING A YMCA CHARITABLE EVENT IN THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Section 24-254 of the City Code, permits the establishment of municipal dispensaries of liquor within the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby establishes a temporary on-sale dispensary allowing Edina Liquor to participate in the fundraising event for the Southdale YMCA at Centennial Lakes on Monday, June 25, 2018. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that on-sale shall be limited to strong beer and wine. Passed and adopted this 5th day of June 2018. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of June 5, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ______________, 2018. _______________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.F. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:MJ Lamon, P rojec t C oordinator Item Activity: Subject:O rdinanc e 2018-08: Boards, C ommittees, C ommis s ions S tudent Members hip C ity C ode S ection 2-80 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2018-08 including waiver of second reading. I N TR O D U C TI O N: Ordinace 2018-08 will change membership of student commissioners to not be limited to only E dina residents. T he change will allow a student attending E dina High S chool (even in an open enroll capacity) to be considered for appointment to an E dina Advisory C ommission. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Ordinance No. 2018-08 DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION JUNE 5, 2018 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 CONCERNING BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 2, Article III, Division 1 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. -2-80 Membership (a) Regular members. Regular members of boards and commissions established by the council shall be adult residents of the city unless otherwise expressly stated by ordinance. Members who discontinue legal residency in the city shall automatically be deemed to have resigned from office as of the date of such discontinuance. (b) Student members. Student members shall be residents of the city or officially open enrolled as a student at Edina High School and entering sophomore, junior or senior year. Student members shall be nonvoting. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon adoption. First Reading: June 5, 2018 Second Reading: Waived Published: June 14, 2018 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send invoice and two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.G . To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:S cott H. Neal, C ity Manager Item Activity: Subject:S econd Amendment to Leas e: Hornets Nes t Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: M otion to approve the Second Amendment to R etail L ease Agreement. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee staff report. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Second Amendment to Retail Lease Agreement Staff Report 1 SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE (hereinafter referred to as this (“Second Amendment”) is entered into as of this 30th day of May, 2018, by and between THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (hereinafter referred to as “Landlord”), and VELOCITY HOCKEY CENTER, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as “Tenant”). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Lease dated July 17, 2012 and amended by a First Amendment dated XXXXXX(the “Lease”), pursuant to which Tenant leased certain premises known as Suite 201 on the upper floor of the building known as “THE HORNET’S NEST” located at Braemar Sports Facility, 7505 Ikola Way, Edina, Minnesota 55439 (hereinafter referred to as the “Building”), which premises are more particularly described in the Lease as the Tenant’s “Premises”); and, WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant disagreed on certain Lease provisions concerning Property Tax, CAM and Utilities, and after discussions and clarifications with the assistance of counsel, Landlord and Tenant mutually agree to clarify those provisions of the Lease. More specifically, this Second Amendment will address Landlord’s billing methodology and Tenant’s payment obligations, calculation of credits due Tenant, Landlord’s billing reconciliation processes and methods for Tenant verification; and, WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to evidence the mutual agreement on these issues effective as of January 1, 2017, with credits to be applied by Landlord to Tenant’s rent obligations, and to amend certain other terms and conditions of the Lease and evidence their agreements and other matters by means of this Second Amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant hereby agree to amend the Lease terms as follows: 1. Property Tax. With respect to Article 6.A, Landlord and Tenant discovered an error in the assignment of the Property Identification Number (PID) resulting in an increased property tax valuation for the Building (defined in the Lease as the “Retail Center”) due to an additional tenancy outside the definition and scope of the Building being included in the Building PID tax assessment. The misapplied PID determination resulted in an overstated tax valuation assessment for the Building. Landlord represents the tax valuation assessment issue has been corrected for taxes payable 2019, and the market value for the Building PID will be determined solely by the tenants of the Building in tax year payable 2019 and thereafter. Landlord reviewed and reconciled Tenant’s tax obligations with the City Assessor for tax years payable 2016, 2017 and 2018 and determined the correct valuation amount, excluding valuation of all leases or assessments outside the PID directly attributable to the Building, and Landlord confirms only tax year payable 2018 was impacted, and Tenant’s allocation of taxes payable for 2016 and 2017 was limited to the net amount applicable to the Tenant’s Premises (77.40%) multiplied by the Total Market Value assessed for the actual PID location of Building alone, exclusive of outside tenants, if any. 2 For the avoidance of doubt, it is understood that the valuation for tax year payable 2018 likely included valuation associated with a separate tenant of Landlord outside the Building’s specific PID, and to the extent such valuation was included, Landlord agrees to credit Tenant with any excess Tenant tax payments attributed to the increased tax resulting therefrom. Notwithstanding the foregoing and regardless of any credit determination by Landlord, Tenant’s tax payment allocation for 2018 shall be capped at 77.40% of $1,027,900 as reflected in the City Assessor tax records for valuation of the Building for tax year payable 2018. 2. CAM. With respect to Article 6.A, Landlord and Tenant have disagreed on CAM reconciliation during the Lease Term and mutually desire to clarify the amount of Tenant’s total monthly CAM obligations effective as of January 1, 2017 through termination of the Lease. Notwithstanding Article 6 methodology for CAM calculation, Landlord and Tenant agree effective as of January 1, 2017, that Tenant’s total monthly CAM amount shall be a flat rate of $100 per month through December 31, 2018. Any excess CAM payments during 2017 and through the date of execution of this Second Amendment shall be credited back to Tenant. Additionally, Landlord agrees to provide Tenant an additional one-time rent credit in the amount of $3000 in exchange for Tenant’s waiver of claims to the extent existing prior to January 1, 2017. Each calendar year following 2018, Tenant shall pay an additional $20.00 per month in CAM until termination of the Lease according to the following schedule: CAM Year Total Monthly CAM 2017 $100.00 2018 $100.00 2019 $120.00 2020 $140.00 2021 $160.00 2022 $180.00 3. UTILITIES. With respect to Article 7, Landlord and Tenant have disagreed on calculations and reconciliation of utility obligations during the Lease Term and mutually desire to clarify the utility obligations effective as of January 1, 2017 through termination of the Lease. Notwithstanding Article 7, Landlord and Tenant agree effective as of January 1, 2017, that Tenant’s utility obligations shall be calculated pursuant to this Second Amendment. Any excess utility payments from January 1, 2017 through the date of execution of this Second Amendment shall be credited back to Tenant. Landlord agrees to restructure the procedures for calculating Tenant’s share of the total natural gas bill and determination of electricity meter readings. Landlord’s practice of determining Tenant’s share of the natural gas bill previously was based on the number of HVAC units (3) that served the Tenant’s Premises (three of the ten HVAC units served the Building square footage and Landlord’s methodology assessed 30% of every monthly natural gas bill to Tenant). Landlord and Tenant determined the lack of separate metering attributable to Tenant in the Building for natural gas, and prior inconsistent billing practices in general with respect to natural gas and electricity, necessitated a different 3 methodology with respect to natural gas charges attributable to Tenant. However, the cost to separately meter Tenant’s premises is substantial. Therefore, Landlord and Tenant desire to clarify allocations attributed to Tenant for natural gas charges billed for the Premises within the Building alone, and hereby outline a process for consistent meter reading for electricity with verification by Tenant. As for natural gas billings attributable to the Building, Tenant’s proportionate share of such amounts through the remainder of the Lease Term shall be calculated under a new methodology to assess a variable percentage of each month’s natural gas bill to Tenant based on the following monthly percentages: Month of Lease Term Building Allocation Percentage January, February, and March 25% April and May 10% June, July and August September and October November and December 5% 10% 25% With respect to the process for verification of meter reading for electricity charges applicable to Tenant, Landlord agrees to establish a fixed date and time for the meter reading and to notify Tenant so Tenant may attend, but regardless, Landlord’s representative shall take a date stamped photograph of the meter at the time of reading and include it with any invoicing notwithstanding Tenant’s attendance or lack of attendance at the meter reading. Further, Landlord shall allow Tenant to perform quarterly inspections of the deduct meter at Tenant’s option in order to compare the KWh numbers on the deduct meter with the billed KWh by Landlord. Regarding water and sewer charges, Landlord and Tenant mutually agree that Landlord will charge Tenant as additional rent a flat monthly charge of $50.00 to cover water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer utility charges, based on Tenant’s current nominal water consumption, subject to Landlord’s further review should Tenant take future action that abnormally increases the current consumption of water within the Premises. There are no changes to the Lease regarding garbage collection or cost sharing and the Landlord will continue to allocate the garbage collection 50/50 between the two primary upper floor Tenants of the Building. 4. Ratification of Lease and Waiver of claims. Tenant hereby affirms that as of the date hereof the Lease is in full force and effect, that the Lease has not been modified or amended (except as provided in this Second Amendment) and that all of Landlord’s obligations accrued to date have been performed, except as outlined in this Second Amendment as a continuing obligation of Landlord. Tenant hereby ratifies the provisions of the Lease on behalf of itself and its successors and assigns and agrees to attorn and be bound to Landlord and its successors and assigns as to all of the terms, covenants and conditions of the Lease as amended hereby. Tenant further agrees to fulfill all of its obligations under the Lease as amended hereby to Landlord throughout the remainder of the Term, and waives known and unknown claims for damages, reimbursements and data practices requests accruing before January 1, 2017. 4 5. Miscellaneous. Tenant hereby agrees that there are, as of the date hereof, regardless of the giving of notice or the passage of time, or both, no defaults or breaches on the part of Landlord or Tenant under the Lease. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Lease. The headings used herein are provided for convenience only and are not to be considered in construing this Amendment. This Amendment shall not be valid and binding on Landlord and Tenant unless and until it has been completely executed by and delivered to both parties. EXCEPT AS expressly amended and modified hereby, the Lease shall otherwise remain in full force and effect, the parties hereto hereby ratifying and confirming the same. To the extent of any inconsistency between the Lease and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have duly executed this Amendment under seal as of the day and year first above written. LANDLORD: THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: ___ Its: By: ____ Its: TENANT: VELOCITY HOCKEY CENTER, LLC By: Name: Noel Rahn Title: Chief Manager June 5, 2018 Mayor and City Council Scott Neal, City Manager Second Amendment to Lease: Hornets Nest Information / Background: The City of Edina and Velocity Hockey entered into an initial retail lease agreement on July 17, 2012, in which the City leased retail space in the Hornets Nest addition at Braemar Arena to Velocity Hockey for the operation of a hockey training and skills development business. The agreement was modified by a First Amendment to the lease on December 5, 2012, to specify the respective costs shares for a lighting improvement. Since the adoption of the First Amendment, the agreement has been unchanged. Representatives from Velocity began to request changes to the lease in 2016. After over two years of negotiations, the parties have reached a tentative agreement on a Second Amendment to the lease agreement. A high-level summary of the material changes to the lease that are included in the Second Amendment are as follows: 1. Property Taxes – The Second Amendment corrects an error in the assignment of property tax valuations between the Hornets Nest and Braemar Golf Course. 2. Common Area Maintenance (CAM) – The Second Amendment reduces, stabilizes and simplifies the methodology for computing Velocity’s monthly share of the Hornets Nest’s common area maintenance (CAM) charges. The amendment also provides for the reasonable growth of the CAM into the future. 3. Utilities – The current lease agreement requires Velocity to pay 30% of Braemar’s monthly natural gas bill. The 30% was included in the initial lease as an estimate of Velocity’s fair share of the Arena’s total monthly natural gas bill. Experience has shown that the 30% share is higher than Velocity’s probable natural gas consumption. The Second Amendment includes provisions which allow a variable share of the Arena’s natural gas bill to be charged to Velocity, depending on the month of the year. The parties believe this methodology more fairly distributes this cost among those consuming the natural gas. The Second Amendment also describes a detailed process for computing the monthly electrical consumption cost shares. STAFF REPORT Page 2 4. Waiver of Claims – The Second Amendment requires Velocity to waive all claims for damages, reimbursements and past data practices requests related to these subjects accruing before January 1, 2017. The Second Amendment does not extend Velocity’s lease term, which is currently scheduled to expire 2022. Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.H. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:C had A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:R es ponse to C reek Knoll A Neighborhood P etition R eceived May 1, 2018 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve staff recommendations to reschedule Creek Knoll A to 2021 for street reconstruction. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee detailed staff report. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Report June 5, 2018 Mayor and City Council Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Response to Creek Knoll A Neighborhood Petition Received May 1, 2018 Executive Summary: Staff recommends rescheduling the Creek Knoll A Neighborhood Street Reconstruction from 2022 to 2021. Information / Background: At the May 1, 2018, City Council meeting, the Council received a petition from residents of the Creek Knoll A Neighborhood. The petition requested the City reconstruct their streets in 2019 or 2020, instead of the current planned reconstruction year 2022. The City’s street reconstruction program is prioritized based on the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) of individual roads which are grouped into neighborhoods. Additional needs within a neighborhood are also determined using watermain break data and non-invasive testing information, sanitary sewer televising reports, stormwater drainage and flooding, and transportation needs such as parking, sidewalks and bike facilities. Neighborhoods appear on the anticipated reconstruction map 6 years prior to construction with year 1 being the current construction year and years 2, 3 and 4 beginning their detailed needs determination and communication schedule. Non-invasive watermain testing occurs 2 years prior to street reconstruction. This information is vital to determine the magnitude of watermain replacement associated with each neighborhood. Watermain replacement has the biggest impact on how many streets we can reconstruct each year. The City contracts with an outside vendor to complete this testing. We just completed testing watermain pipes in the neighborhoods scheduled for 2020. The 6-year anticipated roadway reconstruction map has three Morningside neighborhoods scheduled for 2021 and 2023. Staff is aware there are stormwater drainage and flooding issues in the Morningside Area, and are currently reviewing the feasibility of addressing some of these issues. If it is feasible and financially viable, moving the street reconstruction in this area to consecutive years may provide contractual benefits. Staff has met with the petitioner to discuss this response. There was an understanding about the amount of information required by staff to determine the scale of a project. In some cases, it takes years to collect the STAFF REPORT Page 2 necessary information. The information allows staff to make better decisions about scope of projects and the related funding. Staff recommends moving the Creek Knoll A Neighborhood Street Reconstruction to 2021and moving the Morningside D and E Neighborhoods back one year to 2022. Moving the Morningside neighborhoods back a year would allow staff the time to determine the feasibility of addressing stormwater drainage and flooding issues in back-to-back years. \\Ed-fs1\engpubwks$\ENG\CONST\IMPRS\BAxxx Creek Knoll A 2022\ADMIN\LEGAL\Petition Response 20180605.docx Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.I. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Mark Nolan, AI C P, Transportation P lanner Item Activity: Subject:R evised Edina P edes trian C rossing P olicy Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve revised P edestrian Crossing P olicy. I N TR O D U C TI O N: While preparing the recently-approved P edestrian and B icycle Master P lan, staff determined that it was necessary to take a closer look at revising Edina's existing crosswalk policy (attached). S E H , Inc. was contracted to prepare an update to the policy that better reflects current trends and best practices developed over the past ten years. T he attached D raft P edestrian C rossing P olicy was reviewed by the Traffic Safety Committee and approved unanimously by the E T C at its M ay 17 meeting. T he revised policy will replace the existing policy and used by staff during the traffic safety review process and engineering design efforts. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Exis ting Marked Crosswalk Policy Proposed Pedestrian Crossing Policy Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks The City of Edina's local traffic control policy regarding marked pedestrian crosswalks is as follows: • Marked crosswalks are placed at locations that are unusually hazardous or at locations not readily apparent as having pedestrian movement • Marked crosswalks will only be placed in an area that has 20 or more pedestrian crossings in a two-hour period • Marking for crosswalks will be established by measuring the "Vehicle Gap Time." This is the total number of gaps between vehicular traffic recorded during the average five minute period in the peak hour. Criteria for markings are: o More than five gaps - pavement marking and signage only o Less than five gaps - add actuated pedestrian signals • Crosswalks will not be placed on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 mph unless in conjunction with signalization • Other conditions that warrant crosswalks include: o Routes to schools o Locations adjacent to libraries, community centers, and other high use public facilities o Locations adjacent to public parks o Locations where significant numbers of handicapped persons cross a street o Locations where significant numbers of senior citizens cross a street • Crosswalks should be placed at intersections or - if deemed needed and appropriate by an engineering study or judgement - at mid-block locations No Action Recommended Direct Pedestrians to nearest marked or protected crossing Consider installing “unmarked pedestrian crossing facilitations”(5), subject to staff review/ engineering judgment Direct pedestrians to nearest marked or protected crossing or consider HAWK beacon, traffic signal or grade separated crossing Go to Table 1 ADT ≥1,000 vpd (1) School Crossing* or School Zone**? Multi-Use Path Crossing? Adequate stopping sight distance? (8x speed limit) Meets min. pedestrian volume thresholds? (2) Nearest marked or protected crossing ≥ 300’ away? (4) Remove sight distance obstructions or lower speed limit Crossing serves transit stop or other noticeable, defined and regular crossing? (3) N N N N N N N Y Y Y Feasible Not Feasible Y Y (1) Exception to the 1,000 vpd min. roadway volume threshold may be made for School Crossings* where the peak hour traffic exceeds 10% of the daily traffic (2) Minimum Pedestrian Volume Thresholds: • 20 peds per hour*** in any one hour, or • 18 peds per hour*** in any two hours, or • 15 peds per hour*** in any three hours * School Crossing defined as a crossing location where ten or more student pedestrians per hour are crossing ** School Zone defined as A segment of street or highway that abuts school grounds where children have access to the roadway or where a school crossing is in place *** Young, elderly, and disabled pedestrians count 2x towards volume thresholds (3) Refer to note 2 for guidance on reasonable volume thresholds (4) Distance to the nearest marked or protected crossing may be reduced to 200’ in urban conditions, subject to engineering judgment, where crossing treatments and crossing activity would not create undue restrictions to vehicular traffic operations. (5) An “unmarked pedestrian crossing facility” is any treatment that improves a pedestrian’s ability to cross a roadway, short of the marked, signed and enhanced crossings detailed in Table 1. Installation of this type of pedestrian facilitation is subject to engineering judgment and may include curb ramps and/or a raised median refuge. However, no effort is made to attract pedestrians or recommend that pedestrians cross at this location. The treatments simply provide an improvement for a low volume pedestrian crossing where pedestrians are already crossing and will like continue to cross. City of Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Location Treatment Flowchart Y Start Here Roadway Configuration # of lanes crossed to reach a refuge(1) # of multiple threat lanes(2) per crossing Roadway ADT and Posted Speed 1,000-9,000 vpd (3) 9,000-12,000 vpd 12,000-15,000 vpd > 15,000 vpd ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph 2 Lanes (one way street)2 1 A B C A B C B B C B C C 2 Lanes (two way street with no median)2 0 A B C A B C B B C B C C 3 Lanes (w/raised median)1 or 2 0 or 1 A B D A C D B D D C D D 3 Lanes (w/striped median)3 0 or 1 C C D C C D C C E C D E 4 Lanes (two way street with no median)4 2 A D D B D D B D E D D E 5 Lanes (w/raised median)2 or 3 2 A B D B C D B C E C C E 5 Lanes w/striped median 5 2 D D D D D D D D E D D E 6 Lanes (two way street with or without median)3 to 6 4 E E E E E E E E E E E E Notes: 1. Painted medians can never be considered a refuge for a crossing pedestrian. Similarly, a 4 foot wide raised median next to a left turn lane can only be considered a refuge for pedestrians if the left turning volume is less than 20 vehicles per hour (meaning that in most cases the left turn lane is not occupied while the pedestrian is crossing). 2. A multiple threat lane is defined as a through lane where it is possible for a pedestrian to step out from in front of a stopped vehicle in the adjacent travel lane (either through or turn lane). 3. Additional treatments may be considered if suitable gaps in traffic for safe crossing are not available. Treatment Descriptions A Install marked crosswalk with road-side signs Specific Guidance: Install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) with standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. B Install marked crosswalk with road-side and in-roadway (bollard mounted) signs Specific Guidance: Install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) and “State Law – Stop for Pedestrian” (R1-6) signs mounted on in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. C Install marked crosswalk with signs and geometric improvements to increase pedestrian visibility and reduce exposure Specific Guidance: For 2-lane roadways, install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) and “State Law – Stop for Pedestrian” (R1-6) signs mounted on in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. Add curb extensions (concrete, paint, flexible delineators) or median refuge islands to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists. For 3+ lane roadways, install marked crosswalk with advance regulatory “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) signs mounted on the side of the roadway, (W11-2 and W16-7P) mounted at the crossing location on the side of the roadway and “State Law – Stop for Pedestrian” (R1-6) signs mounted on in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. Add curb extensions or median refuge islands to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists. Advance stop bars may be used in combination with “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) sign. D Install marked crosswalk with advanced “Stop here for Pedestrians” signs, pedestrian activated Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), and geometric improvements to increase pedestrian visibility and reduce exposure Specific Guidance: Install raised median refuge island (unless it is a one-way street or one already exists) to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists. [If a median refuge cannot be constructed on a two-way street, go to Treatment E]. Install marked crosswalk with signs (W11-2 and W16-7P) WITH pedestrian activated RRFBs mounted on the side of the roadway and on median mounted signs AND advance regulatory “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) signs mounted on the side of the roadway; use standard (W11-2) advance warning pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. Consider adding curb extensions at the crossing if on-street parking exists on the roadway and storm drain considerations will allow. Advance stop bars may be used in combination with “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) sign. E Do not install marked crosswalk at uncontrolled crossing. Consider HAWK beacon, pedestrian traffic signal, or grade-separated crossing Specific Guidance: Consider HAWK beacon, pedestrian traffic signal or grade-separated crossing; application of these treatments will consider, corridor signal progression, existing grades, physical constraints, and other engineering factors. City of Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy Table 1. Decision Guide for Crossing Treatments Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.J. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eques t F or P urchas e F rom:C arter A. S c hulze, P E, Assitant C ity Engineer Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: ENG 18-6 F ranc e Avenue S idewalk Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve attached request for purchase for France Avenue sidewalk. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee attached request for purchase report. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Eng 18-6 Reques t for Purchas e City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: June 5, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Subject: Request for Purchase – Contract ENG 18-6 France Avenue Sidewalk Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: May 24, 2018 July 24, 2018 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: GL Contracting Inc. Pember Companies, Inc. Meyer Contracting Inc. Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc. Urban Companies $209,069.30 $220,862.80 $227,777.25 $240,217.50 $283,302.50 Recommended Quote or Bid: GL Contracting Inc. $209,069.30 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This is a joint project between the Cities of St. Louis Park and Edina which will complete a gap in the sidewalk network on France Avenue between W 42nd St and W 39th St. A Joint Powers agreement between the two Cities describes the funding responsibilities for the project. Edina’s portion will be funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety fund. In addition, Hennepin County will provide $75,600 towards the project as part of a County cooperative agreement signed and approved on November 8, 2017. Environmental Impact This project involves installing a new sidewalk along France Avenue. Recycled aggregate material will be used as base for the sidewalk. Community Impact This sidewalk is identified in the Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk Facilities Map. The proposed sidewalk would connect to the existing sidewalk to the south at W 42nd Street, and southward to the 44th & France commercial/retail node. This project will provide a long term solution while enhancing safety and convenience. It is necessary comply with Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.K. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eques t F or P urchas e F rom:C arter A. S c hulze, P E, Assistant C ity Engineer Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: ENG 18-10 Valley View S idewalk P has e 1 Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve attached request for purchase for Valley View S idewalk. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee attached request for purchase report. AT TAC HME N T S: Description ENG 18-10 Request for Purchase City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: June 5, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Carter A. Schulze, PE, Assistant City Engineer Subject: Request for Purchase – Contract ENG 18-10 Valley View Sidewalk Phase 1 Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: May 24, 2018 July 24, 2018 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc. GL Contracting Inc. Meyer Contracting Inc. Rosti Construction Pember Companies, Inc. Urban Companies $349,232.25 $387,435.90 $396,898.85 $449,057.00 $451,994.35 $493,227.80 Recommended Quote or Bid: Ti-Zack Concrete, Inc. $349,232.25 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This project is listed in the 2017-2021 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) under CIP #17-070. This project will be funded by the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) fund. Environmental Impact This project involves installing a new sidewalk along Valley View Road. Recycled aggregate material will be used as base for the sidewalk. Also, as part of this project, existing storm sewer manholes that are leaking and deficient will be replaced and rehabilitated. Community Impact This sidewalk is identified in the Comprehensive Plan Sidewalk Facilities Map and recommended in the City’s Active Routes to School Plan. It is the first phase of three to eventually connect the sidewalks at the High School and Valley View Middle School to the recently installed sidewalk at Valley View Road and Braemar Boulevard. This project will provide a long term solution while enhancing safety and convenience. It is necessary comply with Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure”. Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.L. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eques t F or P urchas e F rom:R os s Bintner P.E., Engineering S ervic es Manager Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: York Avenue Trunk S anitary S ewer Extension P lanning Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve the supplemental letter agreement with S E H , Inc for York Avenue T runk Sanitary S ewer E xtension P lanning. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee attached request for purchase form. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Request for Purchase Supplemental Letter Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: June 5, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Ross Bintner P.E., Engineering Services Manager Subject: Request for Purchase: York Avenue Trunk Sanitary Sewer Extension Planning Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☒Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget SEH, Inc. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: 5/23/2018 n/a Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: SEH, Inc $49,353.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact CIP 15-147, includes $1,000,000 for planning, design and construction. Following this plan a proposal for design of the first phase will be forwarded to Council for consideration. Environmental Impact This is a planning project, but the resulting capital improvements that follow will have impact. The selected combination of options chooses an alignment that avoids the need for lift stations that consume electric power. Community Impact The project serves the purpose planning extended trunk sanitary sewer capacity in south east Edina to prepare for growth. The need for the project is described in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 8 – Water Resource Management and the Southeast Edina Sanitary Sewer preliminary engineering study, Barr Engineering April 2017. The attached proposal from SEH, Inc, proposes to plan a phased alignment for the York Avenue sanitary sewer extension. Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 952.912.2600 | 800.734.6757 | 888.908.8166 fax SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT May 23, 2018 RE: City of Edina York Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension – Engineering Study SEH No. EDINA145878 10.00 Mr. Chad Millner, PE Director of Engineering City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Chad: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH®) is pleased to submit this proposal to the City of Edina (City) for engineering services related to the referenced project. This proposal is based on our discussions with City staff and review of the City’s Southeast Edina Sanitary Sewer Preliminary Engineering study in April 2017. We understand the City desires to better define the proposed sanitary sewer system in the York Avenue (Hennepin County CSAH 31) corridor. This definition will allow staff to proactively program and execute future improvements. Improvements are needed due to current and projected future redevelopment in southeastern Edina. The results of the study will provide the City with the following critical data:  A defined sanitary sewer system alignment within Adams Hill Park, along York Avenue and 65th/66th Streets as shown in Exhibits 1 & 2 attached.  A preliminary horizontal and vertical sanitary sewer system alignment that is feasible to construct and to what extent impacts will be to achieve installation.  Hennepin County approval of the proposed alignment and improvements.  Further refined cost estimates to better inform the City’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for future implementation of phased infrastructure projects. If accepted, this supplemental letter agreement describes how we will provide these services for a not-to-exceed fee of $49,353.00. This amount is detailed in the attached Task Hour Budget (THB) and includes our reimbursable expenses. We will bill the City monthly for reimbursable expenses and on an hourly basis for labor. We will provide these services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated June 4, 2013, herein called the Agreement. Mr. Chad Millner, PE May 23, 2018 Page 2 Our anticipated project production schedule is given in the table below. Anticipated Project Schedule Work Item No. Work Item Description Work Item Key Milestone Date 1 Begin Data Collection June 5, 2018 2 Meeting with Hennepin County to Discuss Opportunities and Constraints along York Avenue Corridor Week of June 11 or 18, 2018 3 Progress Meeting with City Staff to Review Feasible Sanitary Sewer Alignments Week of July 16 4 Meeting with Hennepin County to Review Proposed Sanitary Sewer Alignment Week of August 6 5 Complete Draft Engineering Study September 2018 6 Complete Final Engineering Study October 2018 This Supplemental Letter Agreement, THB, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if signed by both parties. We appreciate the opportunity to offer our professional services to the City and continuing our valuable working relationship. Please contact me at 952.912.2616 or tmuse@sehinc.com with questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Toby Muse, PE Project Manager Enclosures p:\ae\e\edina\145878\1-genl\10-setup-cont\03-proposal\sla ltr york san swr extnsn 052118.docx Accepted on this ___day of________________, 2018 City of Edina, Minnesota By: _________________________________ Name _________________________________ Title AREA 1 AREA 2AREA 3AREA 4 " UN K - 12 " R C P - 6" - 12" VCP- 8" PVC- 12 " - 12 " - 0" PVC- 8"PVC- 1 2 " - 6" - 8" PVC- 12" VCP- 8" HDPE - 10 " P V C - 12 " V C P - 8" P V C - 1 2 " R C P - 10" VCP- 33" R C P - 6 " V C P - 10 " P V C - 8" - 1 2 " P V C - 8" PVC- 6" - 6" PVC- 8" H D P E - 33 " R C P - C I P P 8" - 9" V C P - 33 " R C P - 8" - 10 " V C P - 8" V C P - 9 " V C P - 12" R C P - 12"VCP-CIPP " - 33 " R C P - 9" VCP- 8" P V C - 0" - 8 " P V C - 10" VCP- " U N K - 9" VCP- VINCENT AVENUE SOUTH YORK AVENUE SOUTH 7 0 T H S T R E E T W E S T 7 2 N D S T R E E T W E S T 6 9 T H S T R E E T W E S T 6 8 T H S T R E E T W E S T 6 7 T H S T R E E T W E S T 6 6 T H S T R E E T W E S T S O U T HDAL E C E N TER S O U T H D AL E C E N T E R C O V E N T R Y P L A C E WASHBURN AVENU E SOUTH XERXES AVENUE SOUTH 7 1 1 /2 S T R E E T W E S T WASHBURN AVENUE SOUTH 7 0 1 /2 S T R E E T W E S T PRO ME N A D E VINCENT AVENUE SOUTH 7 1 S T S T R E E T W E S T S O U T H D ALE C ENTER SOUTHDALE CENTER H A Z E L T O N R O A D 6525 3101 3230 3220 3200 3240 6755 67756725 6600 56 24 6825 3100 6975 6803 6805 3210 6905 3121 3209 3201 6800 7001 7000 7101 3383 3443 7141 7151 7298 7201 7355 7335 7230 7200 7330 7320 7300 73507340 I 0 300 600150 Feet Legend $1 SCleanout SCoupling E STee SManhole !!2 QL-A !!2 QL-B !!2 QL-C !!2 QL-D SGravityMain SCollector, Active SLateralLine SCommercial SDomestic 12" VCT-12" VCT- 12" DIP-" U N K - 10" VCT - 8" VCP- " UNK-12"VCT- 12" VCT- 12" DIP- 9" V C P - 9" V C P - 9 " V C P - C I P P 12" VCT- 9" VCP- 12" DIP- 9" V C P - 9" V C P - 9" V C P - 9" V C P - 9" V C P - 9" C P - 9" U N K - 6304 24 6301 6309 6315 6300 6311 6533 6517 3625 3400 6409 6405 64236363 6401 6544 3316 6415 6515 6519 3330 6500 6450 6408 6416 6420 6426 64326438 6444 6453 6455 6457 6459 6461 6463 6465 6467 6469 6471 6473 6475 6477 6479 6481 6483 6485 6487 6489 6491 6493 6495 6497 6499 6400 6525 3250 6550 31013200660056 62ND STREET WEST Z E N I T H A V E N U E S O U T H 66TH STREET WEST BE A R D AV E N U E SO U T H AB B O T T AV E N U E SO U T H X E R X E S A V E N U E S O U T H 64TH STREET WEST 65TH STREET W E S T 6 2 N D STREET WEST 62ND STREET WEST HERITAGE DRIVE UP T O N AV E N U E SO U T H V I N C E N T A V E N U E S O U T H WA S H B U R N AV E N U E SO U T H X E R X E S A V E N U E S O U T H Y O R K A V E N U E S OU T H V A L L E Y V I E W R O A D 65THSTREET WEST S T H Y 6 2 F R O N T A G E R O A D S O U T HDALE CENTER T H O M A S A V E N U E S O U T H Y O R K A V E N U E S O U T H U P T O N A V E N U E S O U T H D R E W A V E N U E S O U T H STAT E H I G H W A Y 6 2 CO L O N Y W A Y PEACEDALE AVENUE F R A N C E A V E N U E S O U T H C H O W E N A V E N U E S O U T H BE A R D P L A C E E W I N G A V E N U E S O U T H T H O M A S A V E N U E S O U T H W A S H B U R N A V E N U E S O U T H HA L I F A X A V E N U E I 0 300 600150 Feet Legend E STee SManhole !!2 QL-A !!2 QL-B !!2 QL-C !!2 QL-D SGravityMain SCollector, Active SLateralLine SCommercial SDomestic SPressurizedMain LifeCycleStatus ! ! !Active SubType %SGate SCasing Subtype SProtectiveTunnel Reimbursable Expenses (25) Total 1.1 12 $1,888.19 1.2 10 2 14 12 4 $5,227.32 2.1 12 3 2 2 $2,234.49 2.2 2.3 2.4 4 4 $902.29 Task #1 - Project Management City Council meeting (4) Draft final engineering study meeting (5) Meetings (Notice, Agenda, Materials, Minutes) Predesign meeting with private utilities Hennepin County meetings (2) Preliminary design review meeting (3) Client: City of Edina Aerial mapping Subtotal Fees Contract and General Contract Administration Preliminary scoping meetings with Client (1) Task #2 - Preliminary Engineering & Study (6) Subtotal Fees SEH Project #145878 Date: May 23, 2018 Data Collection Collect Data from Client/Hennepin County (CAD, GIS, Utility/Street As-Builts, Structure Surveys, etc) (7) Digital parcel mapping (8) Existing sanitary sewer system evaluation (24) Private Utility Coordination Process Conduct Utility Gopher State One Call & Collect Private Utility Maps Subtotal Fees Geotechnical Investigation (9) Topographic Survey (10) Subtotal Fees Field Investigation Review Fairview Area existing conditions (11) Review Adams Hill Park existing conditions (11) Project Name: York Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension - Engineering Study Page 1 of 4 Reimbursable Expenses (25) Total Client: City of Edina SEH Project #145878 Date: May 23, 2018 Project Name: York Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension - Engineering Study 2.5 20 28 7 17 61 25 30 44 $25,386.47 2.6 5 5 $1,095.17 2.7 23 48 17 5 $11,224.50 Preliminary Sanitary Sewer Design (12)(13)(14) Identify and list potential public/private utility conflicts (17)(18) Create CAD base file Incorporate available data info into basemap (Utility Maps, City GIS linework, Data Collection information, etc.) (15) Develop project existing surface model (16) Develop typical sections for construction methods proposed (open-cut installation vs. trenchless pits) Establish proposed pipe alignment (horizontal/vertical) and stationing; identify proposed manhole locations Setup initial pipe model (profile, assemblies, corridor) Sanitary sewer capacity analysis (23) Subtotal Fees Right of Way/Easements (21) Identify permanent right of way/easement needs Quantity Calculations and Feasibility Level Cost Estimating (20) Drainage/Storm Sewer Design (19) Water Main Design (19) Traffic Control Design (19) Street Lighting (19) Identify temporary right of way/easement needs Subtotal Fees Develop draft engineering study Develop final engineering study Prepare and submit pdf copies of the study Prepare Engineering Study (22) Prepare project area figures Subtotal Fees Page 2 of 4 Reimbursable Expenses (25) Total Client: City of Edina SEH Project #145878 Date: May 23, 2018 Project Name: York Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension - Engineering Study N/A 54 $237.70 $7,353.21 N/A 362 $1,156.87 $41,999.78 N/A 416 $1,394.57 $49,353.00 Notes: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) Preliminary design deliverable will be feasiblity level plan and profile sheets (11x17) showing: the proposed alignment and associated profile of the sanitary sewer system including proposed manhole locations, aerial photography, existing contours, base map, street names, and potential utility conflicts. Does not include sanitary sewer service location, sizing, or cost estimating since the scope of future development is unknown. Includes tabular summary of anticipated conflicts with public/private utilities The first scoping kickoff meeting was already held at Edina Public Works on March 29, 2018. The second kickoff meeting was held at Edina Public Works on May 8, 2018. Assumes SEH will lead up to three (3) meetings with Hennepin County staff. The first meeting will be held to determine sanitary sewer alignment opportunities/constraints from County perspective. The second meeting will be held to review the proposed alignment and discuss anticipated impacts to York Avenue during construction. The third meeting is included for reviewing the draft study. Assumes two (2) meetings with City staff during preliminary design to review project design issues/constraints/opportunities Assumes City Council meeting attendance will not be required Assumes one (1) meeting with City staff to review the draft engineering study Preliminary engineering tasks will use sanitary sewer data/recommendations from the City's Southeast Edina Sanitary Sewer Preliminary Engineering Study dated April 2017. Geotechnical investigations are not included. Instead, SEH will use previous soil boring data A topographic survey is not included. Instead, SEH will use Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data and/or topographic survey information obtained during the data collection phase from the City/Hennepin County/others, if available. Includes field review and photos of existing conditions where proposed sanitary sewer alignment is not located in a street. If as-built drawing information does not agree with line work in the GIS data, the City will resolve the disagreement and transmit updated data to SEH. This proposal assumes all utility data is complete within the City's geodatabase (and does not include any time to add or update any utility features) during the project. If updates are requested by the City, we will provide them as an additional service. Obtain latest edition of digital GIS parcel mapping data from Hennepin County's property database. Task Fee Summary Task #1 - Project Management Project Hours Summary Project Fee Summary Project Summary Task Hours Summary Task Fee Summary Task #2 - Preliminary Engineering Task Hours Summary Page 3 of 4 Client: City of Edina SEH Project #145878 Date: May 23, 2018 Project Name: York Avenue Sanitary Sewer Extension - Engineering Study (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) Includes employee mileage, reproductions and computer charges. Based on discussions with City staff, an existing condition evaluation of the existing sanitary sewer system is not required. The scope of work contained herein excludes review and evaluation of closed circuit television (CCTV) video/logs, structure inventory reports, recommended rehabilitation Includes executive summary, introduction, background, and summary of preliminary designs and opinions of probable costs. Discussion will include why particular alignments reviewed during preliminary engineering were not feasible and/or not included. The appendix will include project cost and preliminary plans for each area analyzed. The report will be submitted in .pdf format. Assumes paper copy submittal is not required. Assumes use of utility pothole data obtained from Centerpoint Energy design from 2016 Beltline project, GSOC utility mapping provided by private utilities and City GIS utility information. Utility conflicts will be identified on the preliminary plan and profile sheets Not included with this proposal. Opinion of probable cost will be considered a Class 3 estimate (plus 50%/minus 20%) based on ASTM E2516-11 Standard Classification for Cost Estimate Classification System Includes identifying locations of temporary or permanent easement needs beyond the right of way only. Locations will be shown on the preliminary plan and profile sheets. Right of way easement sketches/documents and estimating acquisition costs are not included in this proposal. Assumes York Avenue corridor will be split up into 5 areas as shown in Exhibit 1 & 2. Assumes 2 iterations of proposed sanitary sewer alignment per area. Assumes capacity analysis, if required to determine pipe diameter sizes based on future development needs, will be completed by others. Includes review comparison between City utility as-built/structure data vs. GIS data Assumes use of topographic survey data obtained from Centerpoint Energy 2016 Beltline project. Page 4 of 4 Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.M. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:R os s Bintner P.E., Engineering S ervic es Manager Item Activity: Subject:R equest for P urc hase: Minnehaha Trunk S ewer R ehabilitation Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Approve supplemental letter agreement with Bolton and M enk, Inc. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee attached request for purchase form. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Request for Purchase Supplemental Letter Agreement City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: June 5, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Ross Bintner, P.E., Engineering Services Manager Subject: Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Bolton and Menk, Inc. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: May 25, 2018 Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Bolton and Menk, Inc. $72,616 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact Capital improvement item 15-150 includes $1,100,000 in funding for this professional service and the resulting project to rehabilitate a section of trunk sewer. The CIP has the funds expended in 2018, but the project will be complete in the winter of 2018/19 so a portion of the expense will come later than scheduled. Environmental Impact The purchase is for a professional service, but the resulting project will use energy and materials in its construction. Pipe lining and repair does not create significant waste. The project repairs leaking pipes and reduces leaks into the wastewater system, reducing the need for other capacity related improvements. Community Impact The project serves the purpose of repairing aging infrastructure, reducing infiltration and inflow of stormwater into the sanitary sewer system, and rehabilitating a sanitary system. The need for the project is described in the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Infiltration Study Report (December 2013). The attached proposal from Bolton & Menk, Inc, proposes to develop plans and specifications for project areas 3 and 5 and a portion upstream of area 5, and rehabilitate as much of the system as possible under the budget described in the CIP. N:\Proposals\Edina\2018 Trunk Sewer Rehab\0525 Final Design Proposal.docx May 25, 2018 Mr. Ross Bintner, P.E. Engineering Services Manager RBintner@EdinaMN.gov RE: PROPOSAL: SS-511, CIP 15-150 Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehab City of Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Bintner, Bolton & Menk, Inc. is pleased to present this proposal to you for professional engineering services in support of its Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation. As a part of this proposal, we describe our understanding of the project, detail our proposed scope of work, and provide our fees for service. This proposal is being offered as a Supplemental Agreement to our June 18, 2013 Master Agreement for Professional Engineering Services with the City of Edina. PROJECT UNDERSTANDING The City of Edina completed an evaluation of its trunk sanitary sewer system in 2013 in order to identify sewer segments susceptible to infiltration problems and to prioritize trunk sewer lines for future rehabilitation and renewal. The study concluded that the 24” vitrified clay pipe (VCP) along Minnehaha Creek has a high potential for infiltration. This conclusion was confirmed via subsequent televising of the sewer pipe, which revealed active infiltration into the pipe. The City secured grant monies from the Metropolitan Council as a part of the 2017 State Bond Funded Municipal I & I Grant Program. At this time, the City is interested in proceeding with a grant-eligible cured in place pipe (CIPP) lining project of the trunk sewer along Minnehaha Creek. The segments of trunk sewer encompassed by this project are identified as Areas 3 and 5 in the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Infiltration Study that was completed in December 2013. The trunk sewer line in Area 3 stretches from Minnehaha Blvd, at W. 54th Street, downstream along Minnehaha Creek to the intersection of Woodland Lane and Woodland Circle. Area 5 begins in Utley Park, and continues downstream along Minnehaha Creek to a manhole on the east side of Minnehaha Creek near W. 52nd Street and Minnehaha Blvd. The length of this sewer is approximately 4500 feet (Area 3: 2373 feet, Area 5: 2142 feet). As an “add” alternate, if bid prices are favorable, the City is also looking at an additional segment of trunk sewer in the Mill Pond area. This segment begins next to Mill Pond, at MH 405 and continues south to MH 410, in Utley Park, just south of 50th Street. The length of this segment is approximately 950 linear feet. The City of Edina has requested this proposal from Bolton & Menk to complete final design, bidding, and construction observation and administration services in support of this project. Proposal: Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehab Date: May 25, 2018 Page: 2 N:\Proposals\Edina\2018 Trunk Sewer Rehab\0525 Final Design Proposal.docx SCOPE OF WORK Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the following services: Final Design and Bidding 1. Kick-off meeting with City staff 2. Project base mapping, utilizing existing City of Edina GIS map layers. 3. Field confirmation of existing ground cover conditions and sewer manhole locations, conditions and accessibility. 4. Resident Communications a. Informational mailing to affected residents. b. Follow-up phone calls to residents to discuss specific project issues and concerns. c. Up to ten (10) meetings with selected adjacent property owners to discuss and negotiate temporary access to trunk sewer system for construction purposes. 5. Prepare technical construction plans and specifications for CIPP lining improvements and manhole improvements along the trunk sewer. 6. Identify temporary sewer bypassing needs and establish parameters for inclusion in bidding documents (assumes City will provide flow information for trunk sewer line). 7. Conduct a neighborhood open house to discuss the proposed project and expectations during construction. 8. Complete and submit required construction permit applications (fees to be paid by City). 9. Prepare project cost estimates. 10. Prepare bidding documents. 11. Advertise project according to standard City practices. 12. Address contractor questions during the bidding period and distribute any necessary addenda. 13. Conduct bid opening, evaluate bids, and make recommendation for project award. 14. City progress meetings (up to 2 meetings). Construction Services 1. Facilitate execution of construction contract between City and contractor. 2. Conduct preconstruction meeting. 3. Review construction material submittals and shop drawings. 4. Conduct preconstruction neighborhood open house. 5. Provide construction observation and administration services including, but not limited to, conducting weekly construction meetings, serve as a liaison between the City, its residents and the contractor, review of the work for general conformance with construction documents, review of material test results, maintenance of construction documentation, preparation of pay estimates and any necessary change orders. 6. Completion of record drawings. We understand the City may desire to utilize its own staff to provide construction services to the extent practical during construction. Therefore we are prepared to adjust our levels of construction services in accordance with the City’s requests and requirements. Proposal: Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehab Date: May 25, 2018 Page: 3 N:\Proposals\Edina\2018 Trunk Sewer Rehab\0525 Final Design Proposal.docx PROPOSED FEES Estimated fees for the final design and bidding services as described above are summarized as follows: Base Mapping and Field Verifications $ 8,748 Resident Communication $ 6,576 Technical Construction Plans & Specifications $37,640 Design Phase Open House $ 1,748 Permit Applications $ 1,244 Project Cost Estimates $ 3,584 Bidding Documents & Assistance $ 10,464 City Meetings $ 2,612 TOTAL $ 72,616 The costs for these individual work tasks are estimates. Bolton & Menk proposes to complete the final design and bidding services on an hourly basis for a not-to-exceed fee of $72,616. Because the consultant does not have direct control over the construction contractor’s operations or schedule, our construction observation and administration services are provided on an hourly basis. Personnel rates for anticipated staffing are as follows: Principal Engineer: $158 per hour Project/Survey Manager: $145 per hour Project Surveyor: $135 per hour Construction Observer: $140 per hour Engineering Technician: $120 per hour Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal to you. Please call if you wish to discuss this proposal further. If you find this proposal satisfactory, your signature of this proposal will constitute acceptance of the terms outlined and your authority for us to proceed. We look forward to providing these professional engineering services to you on this project and appreciate your consideration of Bolton & Menk, Inc. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Sarah E. Lloyd, P.E. Principal Engineer _________________________________________ _______________________________ Signed Date _________________________________________ Printed Name Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: I V.N. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Ann Kattreh, P arks & R ecreation Director Item Activity: Subject:P arks & R ecreation C ommis s ion Work P lan Addition Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Add the following item to the P arks & R ecreation Commission Work P lan: E xplore long term funding options for the P arks & Recreation Department that would supplement the city's budget and C I P. I N TR O D U C TI O N: P lease see attached staff report and Advisory Communication. AT TAC HME N T S: Description PARC Work Plan Addition Staff Report PARC Advis ory Communication June 5, 2018 Mayor and City Council Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director Parks & Recreation Commission Work Plan Addition Information / Background: At the May 8, 2018 Parks & Recreation Commission (PARC) meeting the Commission approved a motion to add an item to their work plan. The PARC originally requested the following item to be included on their work plan: Explore Alternative Funding Models. PARC would like to study long term funding options for the Parks & Recreation Department that would supplement the City’s budgeting and CIP process. Some examples are professional fundraising, endowment fund, friends of the parks, corporate branding, etc. City Administration and the City Council were concerned at the time of assigning work plan items that the PARC had an excessively large work plan and removed this item. Early in 2018 the City of St. Louis Park informed Edina staff that they will not be able to work on the Weber Woods master plan again in 2018. Since the Weber Woods master plan will not be completed this year, this frees up PARC Commissioners’ time and the PARC is requesting that their original item be reinstated on their work plan. The Advisory Communication to the City Council from May 15, 2018 is attached. Date: May 15, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Parks & Recreation Commission Subject: Additional Work Plan Item – Explore Alternative Funding Model(s) Action Requested: We are requesting the addition of a previously requested Parks & Recreation Commission Work Plan item, namely exploring creative options to supplement city funding of park plans. Situation: The Parks & Recreation Commission would like to study long term funding options for the Parks & Recreation Department that would supplement the city’s budgeting and CIP process; for example – Professional fundraising, endowment fund, friends of the parks, corporate branding, etc. Background: The initiative was included in the original Work Plan recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Commission. It was excluded due to other priorities that the council had for the final plan. Since the 2018 Work Plan was approved, activity on Weber Woods has been delayed and it appears unlikely that this initiative will get any action this year. Assessment: Due to the delay in Weber Woods, we have an opportunity to revisit other initiatives of importance for the Parks & Recreation Department. It is clear from work efforts the previous few years (Edina Parks & Recreation Strategic Plan, Fred Richards Master Plan, Braemar Master Plan, Arden park redesign, etc.) that we have many strong initiatives that will require future funding. Recommendation: It is the recommendation of the Parks & Recreation Commission that we reinstate a 2018 work initiative to investigate possible alternative funding options to support future growth and development of Edina’s parks, programs and green spaces. Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: O ther F rom:Kaylin Eidsnes s , S enior C ommunications C oordinator Item Activity: Subject:S peak Up, Edina! Munic ipal Tree S ales Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: No action requested. I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ince J une 2012, the C ity of E dina has used the online engagement website, SpeakUpE dina.org, to collect ideas and opinions from residents. Since January 2014, organized monthly discussions have been held on the site. T he April 2018 conversation focused on municipal tree sales. To keep the tree canopy in Edina strong, the C ity of Edina is looking to gauge resident interest in the C ity partnering with an organization such as T ree Trust to bring discounted trees to residents. Currently, in cities such as S t. Louis P ark and Minneapolis, residents are able to purchase trees at a deeply discounted price through the program. I n St. L ouis P ark, the trees cost residents $35 each and measure 4 to 6 feet. R esidents can select from seven trees purposely selected for their tolerance and environmental impact. T he trees can be ordered online. R esidents are asked to pick up their trees from a specific site during specific dates and times. I n this conversation, the City asked: Would you be interested in purchasing a tree through this program? I f so, why? How much would you be willing to pay for a 4- to 6-foot tree through the program? I f the City were to hold a tree planting workshop for participants to learn more about tree plantings and maintenance, would you be interested in attending? What barriers are holding you back from planting a tree in your yard? T he discussion was open for comments between April 2 and M ay 4. D uring that time, 119 comments were made and the site was viewed 3,350 times. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Speak Up Edina Conversation Staff Pres entation Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes 40 4 104 2 43 PARTICIPANTS TOPICS ANSWERS REPLIES VOTES SUMMARY OF TOPICS BARRIERS 17 Answers · 1 Replies What barriers are holding you back from planting a tree in your yard? Kent Kramer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 4:20 pm 0 Votes Delivery. If some number of local neighbors participated an efficient distribution of trees might result. Dietrich Nissen · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 04, 2018 4:38 pm 0 Votes Delivery and I don't have enough room in my yard for more. FC Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 4:50 pm 1 Votes Cost of removing huge aging trees, over 50 years old. Response: Linda Damman · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 05, 2018 4:53 pm I agree. We have 2 huge Ash trees--already removed one. It's very costly. I would love to see the city offer a group discount for removing diseased trees. Mark Habas · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 5:04 pm 0 Votes nothing. Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 04, 2018 5:18 pm 0 Votes Picking up the tree may be problematic if there's no delivery option. 1 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Anne Salmen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 5:31 pm 2 Votes At the present time, cost and lack of knowledge of what to plant. I'd be very willing to plant if prices were subsidized by the city and there was a limited menu of species from which to choose and information what what would be ideal for different settings/conditions, etc. Kathy Laabs · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 5:47 pm 2 Votes Price and knowing when to plant them and how to care for them. Beth Helgen · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:27 pm 0 Votes Picking up trees to plant them. Laura Kondrick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 7:52 pm 0 Votes I am in a condo assn. how would you work with associations? JoAnn Knutson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 8:42 pm 1 Votes We don't know which kind of trees we should plant so having a special selection that is good here might help us make up our minds. But I would like to know the 7 types of trees that are available. Laurie Greeno · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 9:04 pm 0 Votes Knowing the best type of tree(s) to replace removed boulevard elms, finding an affordable and high quality source of larger trees Dianne Latham · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 8:09 am 1 Votes We do not personally need more trees because we have already planted many and are inoculating our 3 mature Ash trees, Nevertheless, I know that many residents would like to have more trees and this program would surely encourage them to do so. Many local organizations such as the Edina Garden Council would promote the program among their membership and I am certain that such a program would be well utilized. Todd Schenk · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 3:41 pm 1 Votes 2 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes High price and lack of information. Jean Mitchell · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 18, 2018 11:46 am 1 Votes The additional cost of delivery and planting. Randy Evans · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 24, 2018 8:58 pm 0 Votes no barriers- looking forward to seeing a program in Edina Jon DeMars Victorsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 03, 2018 4:38 pm 0 Votes We have at least 2500 new residents moving into apartments in our city, most with not a bit of soil to plant a tree. Is there a way to have them participate, perhaps planting trees in our parks? WORKSHOP 23 Answers · 0 Replies If the city were to hold a tree planting workshop, for participants to learn more about tree plantings and maintenance, would you be interested in attending? Kent Kramer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 4:18 pm 0 Votes Sure, meet more of my neighbors and arrange a planting party on my block. Karen Bertulli · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 4:21 pm 0 Votes Yes. Dietrich Nissen · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 04, 2018 4:38 pm 0 Votes Sure! FC Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 4:49 pm 2 Votes Is there a fee or does this come with the tree purchase so we don't kill it? I would be interested in attending. I would like more than one date option to be made available. 3 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Mark Habas · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 5:03 pm 0 Votes yes Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 04, 2018 5:16 pm 0 Votes Potentially, yes. Anne Salmen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 5:29 pm 3 Votes Potentially, but I have small children and a busy schedule. I would highly recommend also offering an online tutorial via YouTube for those who want to do it right but can't attend. Kathy Laabs · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 5:46 pm 0 Votes Absolutely - I would like to make sure that the trees survive and I do not have a green thumb;) Sandy Martin · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:14 pm 0 Votes comment...no, I will read instructions and follow them Beth Helgen · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:29 pm 1 Votes Probably not. I like the idea of an online tutorial and, as I said in a precious post, this program would be especially appealing if there were a way to arrange to have it planted. Laura Kondrick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 7:49 pm 0 Votes No JoAnn Knutson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 8:52 pm 1 Votes Yes but I like the idea of an online class if I couldn't make the class when it was offered. 4 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Laurie Greeno · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 9:00 pm 0 Votes Potentially yes depending on specifics ( date, amount of time, time of day). Assume it would be free of chargw Dianne Latham · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 8:20 am 1 Votes There is already much information on-line. Just google How to Plant a Tree. Nevertheless, a live workshop is important so that participants can ask questions. In addition, the workshop can be geared to those trees selected for the program. Although I would not attend such a workshop because we already have all the trees we need in our yard, I feel it is very important for those who may not be experienced at tree planting. This would help insure that the tree would not be killed in the first couple of years. Local organizations such as the Edina Garden Council would be sure to promote such a workshop among their membership. Todd Schenk · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 3:39 pm 1 Votes Sure. Mpls requires going to the tree workshop to get a good price for the tree. Lorraine Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 05, 2018 9:32 pm 1 Votes I think I'm able to plant the tree, but if attending reduces the price, I would consider attending a class. Andrew Langfield · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 08, 2018 7:17 pm 0 Votes Yes to attending. Having a YouTube tutorial as backup makes sense. Jean Mitchell · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 18, 2018 11:44 am 0 Votes Probably not. Rich Sinykin · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 1:46 pm 1 Votes Would prefer instructions with the tree or an option to have the tree planted. Adam R. · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 18, 2018 5:31 pm 0 Votes 5 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes I'd be interested in attending as I'd like to learn more about trees from experts, including where/how to plant and how to maintain. Luke Strauss · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 20, 2018 8:31 am 0 Votes I'd be interested in attending, but as a working professional with a kid, it would almost certainly need to be a weekend workshop for me to be able to make it. Randy Evans · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 24, 2018 8:57 pm 0 Votes sure! want to make sure the trees are panted correctly and survive. Jon DeMars Victorsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 03, 2018 4:26 pm 0 Votes If only to suggest that residents notify Gopher State One Call at least two working days in advance before digging in their yard to plant the tree(s). I wouldn't mind clarification about mulching around the trunk of trees. I understand it's harmful to the trees, yet it's so popular?! PURCHASE A TREE 40 Answers · 1 Replies Would you be interested in purchasing a tree through this program? If so, why? Kent Kramer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 4:16 pm 2 Votes Yes, I like shade. Karen Bertulli · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 4:20 pm 1 Votes Yes, trees are vital to the health of our city. Claudia Pennella · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 4:27 pm 0 Votes comment...I would be willing to purchase seveal trees Dietrich Nissen · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 04, 2018 4:30 pm 0 Votes 6 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Sure! Oxygen = Good! FC Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 4:45 pm 1 Votes For all of the above reasons, I would be interested in purchasing a tree. Also, we have an Ash that we might have to replace. Mark Habas · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 5:03 pm 0 Votes Yes. We had to have a tree removed and want to replace it. Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 04, 2018 5:12 pm 0 Votes Yes, I would be interested. Marilyn Christensen · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 5:23 pm 1 Votes Yes, I would like to purchase a tree. We have a lovely ash tree in our yard. A new tree could be growing just in case something should happen to the ash. Anne Salmen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 5:27 pm 3 Votes Yes!! I used to live in Mpls and have always admired their strong arborist programs. They replace lost trees, plant for beautification and make it easier for citizens to plant trees (via discounted sales, etc.). With all the infill construction and the trend toward a warming plant, it seems especially imperative that Edina adopt a more aggressive program. It's good for our health, it's good for our environment and it's likely good for property values as it enhances the beauty of our homes and neighborhoods. Kathy Laabs · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 5:45 pm 0 Votes Yes!! We have a very large yard and very few trees. This has been something my husband and I have been discussing. Sandy Martin · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:13 pm 1 Votes comment...Yes! The trees selected will do well in the area and are affordable. 7 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Beth Helgen · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:24 pm 0 Votes Yes. We have removed several trees and need to replace them. deanne miller · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 6:40 pm 1 Votes Yes! I would love to be able to purchase affordable Trees Anne McShane · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:58 pm 1 Votes Yes. We had 3 ailing crabapples we had to take down last summer. We want to plant native species to support other native plants, animals, and insects. Laura Kondrick · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 7:48 pm 0 Votes I think city should also coordinate with Arbor Day Foundation. They offer free tress with membership. JoAnn Knutson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 8:45 pm 0 Votes Yes we want to replace two trees that are gone. Laurie Greeno · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 8:55 pm 0 Votes Yes, we have lost 3 elms ( despite treating them) the last 3 years Jan Johnson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 11:08 pm 0 Votes Yes. We have taken down a few trees and replaced them already. We have a few more older trees that we would like to replace as they come down. Dianne Latham · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 8:06 am 1 Votes This would be an outstanding program which the Edina Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) asked the city to implement some years ago when I was on the commission. EEC suggested that Edina use the successful St Louis Park program as a model and I am happy to see that is being done! 8 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes John King · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 10:12 am 2 Votes No one has mentioned SAVING the existing Ash trees from the Emerald Ash Borer. All of the arborists like Davey Tree offer injections that will save the Ash trees. Each injection lasts two years and costs about $82 per year. That way you can keep your full size tree rather than plant a small one and wait for it to mature. Response: Jon DeMars Victorsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 03, 2018 3:40 pm We have been having a very large Green Ash for about eight years. Its every-other year cost is about $480. In 2010-2011 it was given Xytect Soil Injections. 2012 & 2014 it was given TREE-age Injections. 2016 & 2018 it was/will be injected with Emamectin Benzoate. It's costly, but a magnificent tree if we can keep it! Jeff Waychoff · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 05, 2018 10:58 am 0 Votes I would definitely be interested in this. Keep us apprised of where to purchase if all moves forward. Todd Schenk · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 3:37 pm 1 Votes We'd like to replace trees that a former owner removed. We would purchased from a tree program, and have done so at previous residences. Lorraine Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 05, 2018 9:24 pm 0 Votes Yes, I would be very interested in this and want to replace our ash trees with other, more suitable trees. Andrew Langfield · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 08, 2018 7:11 pm 0 Votes Yes we would be interested in purchasing trees. We had to remove two trees over the last 3 years due to carpenter ant damage. Michelle Grey · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 10, 2018 11:41 am 0 Votes Yes, would be interested in adding more trees to our yard, especially fruit trees. Jean Mitchell · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 18, 2018 11:40 am 0 Votes It depends, probably. 9 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Colin Peterson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 11:41 am 1 Votes Yes. The city should start this program as soon as possible. Joan Wallner · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 18, 2018 12:11 pm 0 Votes We'd be interested in buy at least 3-4 trees! Judith Zerbe · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 12:40 pm 0 Votes We would be interested in buying a couple of trees CHase Peterson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 1:34 pm 0 Votes For sure! This would be a great program for the city of edina to offer to its residents. Peggy Smith · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 1:40 pm 0 Votes Yes. Rich Sinykin · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 1:40 pm 0 Votes Yes Adam R. · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 18, 2018 5:28 pm 0 Votes Yes please! We have space for trees and some trees that it would be great to replace (box elders and other "undesirable" trees. Lisa Ellison · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55410) · Apr 19, 2018 7:04 am 0 Votes Yes, we need trees kristen rice · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 19, 2018 9:41 am 0 Votes Yes 10 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Jami Bly · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 19, 2018 10:19 am 0 Votes Yes, trees make our city beautiful, give us clean air, and provide shelter for birds. Luke Strauss · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 20, 2018 8:27 am 0 Votes Absolutely yes, I would buy several. Randy Evans · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 24, 2018 8:53 pm 0 Votes yes- I participated in the program in SLP years ago and it's a great idea- long overdue. Jon DeMars Victorsen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · May 03, 2018 4:06 pm 0 Votes I have participated with purchasing and planting trees in bulk, and will probably do so again. I would caution folks that these may not be the specimen-quality tree that you would expect to plant in the middle of your front yard; maybe the supplier and trees will be top-notch. My second caution is of Ginkgo trees. They are well suited for their "tolerance" of harsh urban sites. I am not an expert, but I am avoiding this species because of reports that they have nasty allergenic qualities, both from contact with their leaves and with the sap when cutting limbs. WILLING TO PAY 24 Answers · 0 Replies How much would you be willing to pay for a 4- to 6-foot tree through the program? Kent Kramer · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 4:17 pm 1 Votes I suppose it depends on the species. Maybe 20 to 25% less than going rate to be part of a bulk program. Claudia Pennella · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 4:28 pm 2 Votes I suppose I would pay whatever the going rate is., My guess is that these would be cheaper then anywhere else in town. 11 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Dietrich Nissen · Admin · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 04, 2018 4:37 pm 1 Votes Depends. Would the cost also include planting the tree? FC Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 4:46 pm 5 Votes $35 like St Louis Park seems acceptable. Mark Habas · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 5:03 pm 1 Votes $50. Jennifer Hennemuth · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 04, 2018 5:16 pm 4 Votes The price of $35 like St. Louis Park would incentivize tree purchases. Having the additional option of professional planting would also be a nice option to have. And it would be nice to have a variety of trees to choose from, i.e. Birch, maple, flowering, evergreens etc. Anne Salmen · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 5:28 pm 3 Votes $35 would be ideal. I'd be likely to buy more than one at that price point, too. Kathy Laabs · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 5:46 pm 2 Votes $35 to $50 seems like a bargain and I would buy at least 2 or 3. Sandy Martin · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:13 pm 0 Votes comment...up to $50 Beth Helgen · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:26 pm 1 Votes $50-75. It would be more appealing to us if we had an option to have it planted, even for an additional fee. deanne miller · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55435) · Apr 04, 2018 6:42 pm 1 Votes 12 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Depends on the tree - but the more affordable they are, the more we could plant - and certainly, promote to neighbors - many of my neighbors are retired and on fixed income - but I would be very willing to help them plant more trees, if they wanted them Anne McShane · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 6:59 pm 1 Votes Agree with $35-70, with additional for planting. JoAnn Knutson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 04, 2018 8:50 pm 1 Votes I think it is more important to be really nice trees than to really cheap. If they were misshaped or two little I don't think I would buy them. Laurie Greeno · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 04, 2018 8:57 pm 1 Votes Price would be dependent on variety and size. We'd be interested in the option to buy larger trees ( than the 4-6ft) if that would be possible. Hope that all varieties made available would be disease resistant. Dianne Latham · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 8:13 am 0 Votes $35 for a 4 - 6 ft tree is a real bargain! Moving and planting a tree that size is not a problem if a resident has access to a SUV, Outback, pick-up truck, or other such vehicle. Todd Schenk · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 05, 2018 3:38 pm 1 Votes Trees in the Mpls tree program have been $25. That seems like a good price. Lorraine Hanson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 05, 2018 9:29 pm 0 Votes $25 to $35 seems like a good price for a 4-6 foot tree that could transported and planted more easily by home gardeners, Andrew Langfield · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55424) · Apr 08, 2018 7:22 pm 0 Votes $35 - $50 per tree. 13 of 14 Full Report Municipal Tree Sale Closed May 04, 2018 · Discussion · 40 Participants · 4 Topics · 104 Answers · 2 Replies · 43 Votes Colin Peterson · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 11:41 am 0 Votes $35-50. Jean Mitchell · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 18, 2018 11:43 am 0 Votes It depends on the type of tree and comparable costs at nurseries. Also, is there a warranty? Judith Zerbe · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 12:42 pm 0 Votes A range around St Louis Park seems more than reasonable Rich Sinykin · Citizen · (Postal Code: unknown) · Apr 18, 2018 1:43 pm 0 Votes Price similar to what St. Louis Park is charging and Minneapolis are charging. Luke Strauss · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55436) · Apr 20, 2018 8:30 am 0 Votes Depends on the tree and the comparable retail price, I'd be willing to pay up to $50 a tree if it made sense. I'd rather get a slightly smaller tree for less than 50, instead of paying more to get the 4-6' tall one. Randy Evans · Citizen · (Postal Code: 55439) · Apr 24, 2018 8:55 pm 0 Votes again- depends on the tree- but $35-50 seems like a great deal. Would like to see evergreens available, although cost may be more for a tree of 4-6 feet 14 of 14 Full Report The CITY of EDINA Speak Up, Edina! April Discussion: Municipal Tree Sale The CITY of EDINASpeakUpEdina.org EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINAMunicipal Tree Sale In this discussion, the City posed the following questions: •Would you be interested in purchasing a tree through this program? If so, why? •How much would you be willing to pay for a 4-to 6-foot tree through the program? •If the city were to hold a tree planting workshop, for participants to learn more about tree plantings and maintenance, would you be interested in attending? •What barriers are holding you back from planting a tree in your yard? EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINAApril Discussion •Open April 2-May 4 •119 comments (Includes comments on Nextdoor and Facebook) •3,350 page views EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA •Nearly everyone in the discussion said they would participate in the program. •People, on average, would pay between $30-$75 per tree; some more if the tree could be delivered and/or planted. •Many would be interested in attending a tree planting workshop; some prefer the workshop to be online. •Minneapolis lowers the cost of the trees for those who attend a tree planting workshop. •Barriers mentioned include: •-Transporting the tree •-Labor to plant a tree •-Cost to remove older trees in poor shape •-Lack of knowledge of what to plant In Summary EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINASpeak Up, Edina! Questions? SpeakUpEdina.org EdinaMN.gov 6 Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:P UBLI C HEAR I NG : O rdinanc e No. 2018-11 and R es olution No. 2018-50; R ezoning and P reliminary Development P lan for P entagon P ark S outh, 4815 & 4901 77th S treet and 7710 C omputer Avenue for S olomon R eal Estate G roup Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2018-11 creating P U D D istrict 17 (first reading), and approve Resolution N o. 2018-50 P reliminary Rezoning and P reliminary Development P lan. I N TR O D U C TI O N: On M ay 9, 2018, the P lanning Commission recommended approval of the Rezoning and P reliminary Development P lan. Vote: 8 Ayes & 1 Nay. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Planning Commission Staff Report Applicant Narrative Proposed Plans 1 of 2 Proposed Plans 2 of 2 Engineering & AFO Review Memos Site Location Maps & Previous Site Development Plans Traffic Study Minutes - May 9, 2018 Planning Commission Sustainability Coordinator's review memo Sustainability Questionnaire Resolution No. 2018-50 Ordinance No. 2018-11 Staff Pres entation May 9, 2018 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Rezoning, Subdivision & Preliminary Development Plan for Pentagon Park South. (4815 & 4901 77th Street and 7710 Computer Avenue.) Information / Background: Solomon Real Estate Group is requesting a Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-17 to develop the vacant 12.5 acre Pentagon South Parcel (4900 77th Street). The first phase would include 11,800 square feet of retail space, a 193-room hotel, a 153 room hotel, and a parking ramp. The second phase would be two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and no Final Development Plan was approved. (See attached 2014 draft Overall Development Plan.) The uses proposed here are generally consistent with the south portion of the draft overall development plan for Pentagon South. Pentagon Park North will be reviewed as a separate future development, as that plan is very different than the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). Therefore the applicant is proposing a revised PUD and Overall Development Plan to just include the south parcel. At full development build out, the project would include 225,000 square feet of office space, 2 hotels (346 rooms), 30,800 square feet of retail and two parking structures with a total of 1,545 spaces. As proposed the development would require the following: Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development, Overall Development Plan; Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1; and Subdivision. STAFF REPORT Page 2 The Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The applicant has responded. (See the attached applicant narrative.) The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson, AFO, has also reviewed the plans and provided feedback. (See attached memo from AFO). The following highlights some of the comments: The plan has retained the central park feature from the draft PUD but at a much reduced scale. In place of larger buildings fronting W. 77th Street, the proposal suggests 2 retail pads with parking and a mixed use retail/office on the corner of W. 77th and Computer Avenue. This would suggest a more typical suburban development approach, not consistent with primary buildings facing W. 77th as delineated in the approved PUD. Incorporating retail into office buildings could enliven these buildings during more times of day, supporting the goal of a 24/7 community. Having retail, hotel and office surrounding all sides of the central park as outlined in the PUD, along with a direct connection to Pentagon Park North, begins to create a relationship between both sides of 77th. We would suggest moving all components of the proposal closer together with greater density of activity closer to 77th. On grade parking should be considered as a placeholder for future development and not as part of the overall plan in phase one. The west office building terrace at the 2nd level should face the park, which would create a stronger semi-urban identity. All building should create program space for street fronting buildings on secondary streets around the whole development. The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. (See attached sketch plans and minutes.) Based on feedback from the Planning Commission, the City Council, the applicant has: Eliminated the drive-through; Reduced the amount of surface parking; Increased setback on Viking Drive from 5 to 10 feet; Increased the setback on Computer Drive from 10 feet to 18 & 20 feet; and Combined the parking structures with buildings. Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone, meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has considerable discretion when reviewing this application. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Multi-family residential and retail; zoned MDD-6, Mixed Development District and guided OR, Office Residential. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Easterly: Office/light industrial uses; zoned PID, Planned Industrial District and guided OR, Office Residential. Southerly: City of Bloomington. Westerly: Highway 100. Existing Site Features The proposed redevelopment site is currently vacant. All the buildings on the site were removed a few years ago. The site is 12.5 acres in size, and relatively flat. Planning Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential. Zoning: MDD-6, Mixed Development District Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1311, at full build out the development would require 1,718 parking stalls. As proposed, the development would provide 1,422 parking stalls total. This includes the surface parking (195 stalls) and the two ramps. Flexibility is requested through the PUD Rezoning to reduce the number of stalls. WSB conducted a parking study and determined that 1,359 spaces would be adequate. (See attached study.) Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Access to the proposed development would be off all four sides of the site; 77th Street, Normandale Road, Computer Avenue and Viking Drive. There is internal access to all uses within the site. The main entrance to the site is off 77th Street. WSB also conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project subject to the following road improvements: 1. Addition of a northbound left turn lane, southbound striped left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Commercial Access driveway. 2. Addition of a northbound dual left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Computer Avenue. Per the existing development agreement with the property owner in 2014 was that the applicant/landowner is responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Staff would recommend that that same condition apply to this new proposal. Final plans would be subject to the recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer. The above road improvements should also be a condition of any approval. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 50 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans show that 150 overstory trees would be planted. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are also proposed. Every overstory tree on the subject property would be removed. At full build out of the project, the landscaping would be a vast improvement over existing landscaping and trees. Grading/Drainage/Utilities Within the project there are two water features; one in the center plaza area and the other along Normandale Road adjacent to the office building. There would also be underground storage. The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. A site improvement plan agreement would be required for the construction/repair of the public drive to the park, sidewalks and utilities. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination of stone, metal panel and glass. The applicant will have a materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading and trash areas would be adjacent to the buildings and within the parking ramps. Building Height The building height requirement for this site is 12 stories and 144 feet. (See attached building height overlay district map.) The proposed projects meets the City’s height standards. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: STAFF REPORT Page 5 (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The proposal would enhance pedestrian, bike and vehicular connections in the area. A boulevard sidewalk is proposed along all four streets, as well as a series of internal pedestrian connections. There are also pedestrian crosswalks proposed across 77th street. (See attached plans.) Bike racks shall be provided to meet City Code as highlighted in (6) above, which would be 87 stalls for bikes. STAFF REPORT Page 6 COMPLIANCE TABLE While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the existing MDD-6 District: *Does not meet City Code Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; City Standard (MDD-6) Proposed – PUD Rough Estimates Setbacks - Buildings Front Setback Setbacks - Parking Structures 35 feet + ½ foot for each foot the building height exceeds minimum setback 20 feet or the height of the structure 17, 25, & 30 feet (77th Street)* 18 & 20 feet (Computer Ave)* 50 Feet (Normandale Blvd.)* 10 feet (Viking Drive)* Building Height 12 stories south of 77th Street 6 stories Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street) 20 feet Building Coverage 30% 29% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50% - Non-residential Uses 50% - Residential Uses 527,947 SF Total 494,000 s.f. mixed use Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District 1,718 required 1,422 proposed* STAFF REPORT Page 7 b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Some of the above criteria are included with this development proposal. The project is mixed use (retail, office, hotel) though the buildings themselves are not. The proposal would provide improved vehicle and pedestrian connections in and around the site. The proposed plans are generally consistent with the draft overall development plan for this site, which included two large parking ramps and three large office buildings. The proposed plan introduces retail and restaurants to the site. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed uses are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as OR, Office Residential, which encourages a mixture of uses. Uses include: STAFF REPORT Page 8 Offices, attached or multifamily housing. Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; This project would be a mixture of uses, though no individual building contains mixed use. There is potential for the Phase 2 retail and office building on the corner of Computer and 77th to contain mixed uses. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; This is a mixed use proposal. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and The uses allowed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The square footage of the proposed development is within the AUAR development scenarios. Additionally, the WSB Traffic study concludes that the surrounding roadways could support the use, subject to roadway improvements. iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The table on page 6 shows how the proposed new buildings would comply with the MDD-6 Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in the new PUD-17 District. The only flexibility requested is in regard to setbacks and parking. In relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above should be met. The area would be improved from existing conditions on the site, and the pedestrian and vehicle connections would be improved. There also would be an increase in green space. STAFF REPORT Page 9 AUAR (Alternative Urban Areawide Review) As part of a rezoning of the Pentagon Park Area to MDD-6, Mixed Use Development, an AUAR, Environmental Study was completed in 2007, to examine impacts of the proposed development, and development scenarios beyond the densities suggested by the development. The proposed development in 2007 was to tear down the buildings on the Pentagon Tower and Pentagon Quads site and build the following: 634 senior housing units An 80,000 square foot hotel Two office towers that would total 737,000 square feet, and two above ground parking structures. The 2007 project was never developed; and the property ownership has since changed to Hillcrest Development. The study was updated in 2013 to consider the Hillcrest proposal. (See attached.) The following is a breakdown of the anticipated land uses at that time: Office – 1,420,000 square feet. Retail – 40,000 square feet. Hotel – 250,000 square feet (375-425 rooms) Parking structures – 6,400 parking stalls. Housing (would replace some of the office if built.) An AUAR allows the flexibility to examine different development scenarios, including what would be allowed under the current zoning and comprehensive plan; and other development scenarios, including, what the developer is considering. An AUAR enables cities to evaluate how much development can be accommodated in an area without significant environmental impacts. The proposed office, hotel and retail development is consistent with the south parcel scenario 3 contemplated. (See the attached AUAR.) PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site? This site has some significant development challenges to redevelop. There is a high water table and peat soils, which prevents a significant amount of parking to go underground. The soils are very poor for re-development. Pilings would be required due to the peaty soils. Pilings would add significant development cost to the project. The applicant has tried to address the site issues and respond to the comments from the sketch plan. Since the project closely resembles STAFF REPORT Page 10 the draft preliminary development plan, and the plan approved in 2007, staff supports the proposed project for the following reasons: 1. Conformance with the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. Provide a “come to” and “stay at” development with mixed uses, retail, restaurant, public space including seating areas, and a center plaza; High quality buildings and design; Provision of added shared public parking. Public art; and Economic vitality brought to Pentagon Park. 2. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. STAFF REPORT Page 11 i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. (See pages 6-8 of this report.) In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provides a mixed-use development by including retail, office, hotel and restaurants. b. Creates a very pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of sidewalks through and around the site. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with the draft Preliminary Plan, the 2007 Plan, and goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 4. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking, subject to roadway improvements. (See attached traffic & parking study.) Conclusion/Recommendation As this is a request for a Rezoning, the City has substantial discretion as to approving or denying this request. (See the pyramid of discretion on page.) Below are the alternative actions to be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council: Preliminary Rezoning to PUD, Overall Development Plan & Preliminary Development Plan Approval Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, Subdivison, and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF REPORT Page 12 2. Conformance with the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. Provide a “come to” and “stay at” development with mixed uses, retail, restaurant, public space including seating areas, and a center plaza; High quality buildings and design; Provision of added shared public parking. Public art; and Economic vitality brought to Pentagon Park. 3. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. STAFF REPORT Page 13 iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 4. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provides a mixed-use development by including retail, office, hotel and restaurants. b. Creates a very pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of sidewalks through and around the site. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with the draft Preliminary Plan, the 2007 Plan, and goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking, subject to road improvements. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. The exterior treatment on the parking garage facing the internal street must be matched on the exterior of the parking garage that faces Bloomington. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May 3, 2018. STAFF REPORT Page 14 9. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations including: A. Addition of a northbound left turn lane, southbound striped left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Commercial Access driveway. B. Addition of a northbound dual left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Computer Avenue. 10. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th Street is required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the applicant/landowner is responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans would be subject to the recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer. 11. All crosswalks shall be marked with “duraprint” type stamping, or whatever is the city standard at the time of installation, to clearly identify the pedestrian crossings. 12. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. 13. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-17, Planned Unit Development for this site. Denial Recommend the City Council deny the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, Subdivison and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1, subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal does not adequately address the guiding principles regarding Green Streets, Integrated Stormwater, Pedestrian Friendly 77th Street, Connections from West to East, Multimodal Connections and Shared Parking. 2. The proposal does not adequately meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning, including vertical mixed uses, sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, and pedestrian oriented design. 3. The current zoning, MDD-6 provides a reasonable use of the property and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff Recommendation: STAFF REPORT Page 15 Based on the findings outlined above, staff recommends approval of the proposed Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, Subdivision, and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1, subject to the findings and conditions above. Deadline for a city decision: August 7, 2018 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 1 of 25 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers May 9, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Miranda, Lee, Strauss, Mittal, Jones, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Olsen. Staff Present: Cary Teague, City Planner, Kris Aaker and Emily Bodeker, Assistant Planners, Kaylin Eidsness, Communications Coord, Jackie Hoogenakker, Support Staff Absent from the roll: Todd Thorsen III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Miranda moved to approve the May 9, 2018, Planning Commission Agenda. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Commissioner Strauss moved to approve the April 25, 2018, meeting minutes. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Commissioners Lee and Berube offered a change to the April 25th meeting minutes. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Public Hearings A. Variance. 6612 Cornelia Drive, Edina, MN. New home construction. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reported that the applicant is requesting to rebuild a home in the same location as the existing home and not construct a basement given the Flood Plain elevation of 863.6 at 6612 Cornelia Drive. This property is located in the Cornelia Neighborhood backs up to Lake Cornelia with a portion of the property located within the floodplain. The existing home is nonconforming and is within the minimum 75-foot setback from Lake Cornelia. The property is also bisected by the 100 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 2 of 25 year/1% chance per year Flood. The City of Edina’s Engineering standards require the basement elevation of the new home to be 2 feet higher than the FEMA base flood elevation. The requirement for increased height in basement elevation impacts the ability for the project to conform to the basement requirement or the maximum first floor height requirement of 1 foot. Instead of elevating the basement and asking for a 1st floor height variance, the homeowner is proposing to ask for a variance from the basement requirement for single dwelling units. Aaker explained that the property is located south Cornelia Drive and backs up to Lake Cornelia. The existing rambler on the property was built in 1955 prior to the FEMA floodplain study conducted in 1979 to determine flood risk areas. The lowest level of the home is at 862.2, which is approximately 3.4 feet lower than the minimum flood protection elevation of 865.6. The existing basement is lower than the minimum required by ordinance so the homeowner is proposing a crawl space and no basement. It is a City and Watershed District goal to elevate and remove homes out of the flood hazard areas when the opportunity presents itself. The new first floor will be at the same elevation as the existing first floor. This can be accomplished given that there will be no basement; only crawl space below the first floor. The home backs up to Lake Cornelia and is nonconforming regarding existing setback from the lake. The current ordinance requires a minimum 75-foot setback from Lake Cornelia. The existing home provides a setback to the lake of approximately 53 feet. The proposed new home will match the nonconforming setback of the existing home. Conforming to the required 75-foot setback from Lake Cornelia and the minimum front yard setback of 34.15 feet allows for an impractical building depth of 21 feet, rendering the lot unbuildable. The property owner is hoping to maintain the existing nonconforming Lake setback of the current home. Aaker noted that the variance is requested to allow no basement and maintain the existing nonconforming Lake setback. The current home located at 6612 Cornelia Drive has a basement elevation of 862.2 feet above sea level. The established floodplain elevation is 863.6. The minimum basement elevation must be no less than 2 feet above the flood elevation so the minimum basement elevation for the property is at 865.5 feet. The proposal is to forgo a basement. Generally, property owners contending with nonconforming basement elevations request a 1st floor height variance. The City Code has specific language in place to allow, (in appropriate circumstances), variances from the 1st floor height requirement when dealing with the flood zone and nonconforming basements. In this instance the owner would like to comply with the 1st floor height requirement, however, cannot do that without eliminating the basement. Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of the variance, as requested subject to the findings listed in the staff report above, and subject to the following conditions: 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans: Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 3 of 25 • Survey date stamped April 19, 2018. • Building plans and elevations date stamped April 19, 2018. 2. Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo dated May 2, 2018. Appearing for the Applicant Ron Rasley, property owner. Discussion/Comments/Questions Planner Aaker was asked if she knows why the City requires basements. Aaker explained the City has always had this requirement, adding she is unsure of the exact reason. Continuing, Aaker noted basements are typical in Minnesota; reasons could be the weather, safety, addition space, etc. It was noted that the requirement of limiting monies spend on a non-conforming property in the flood plain was an interesting requirement. Aaker explained that FEMA encourages minimal disruption and enhancement for properties located in the flood plain. She pointed out if properties continue to build and expand in the flood plain and if flooding continues to be an issue insurance payout and rates continue to increase. Whenever possible FEMA would like properties brought out of the flood plain; however, it was understood that many properties are already located in a flood areas. A brief discussion ensued on the topic of the City requiring basements. It was noted that in certain instances that is unrealistic. It was suggested that requiring basements be added as a discussion topic on the Planning Commission’s Work Plan. Applicant Presentation Mr. Rasley addressed the Commission and explained he has lived in Edina for a number of years and when a house came available on Lake Cornelia, he decided to move. He stated it was very important for him to stay in and invest in Edina. Rasley told the Commission they removed scrub trees from the lot and have a landscaping plan. He said there would be no change in drainage. Concluding, Rasley said he was happy to be able to stay in Edina and be a good neighbor. Mr. Rasley was asked if he had heard from any of the immediate neighbors. Rasley responded that they hosted a neighborhood open house and shared their house plans. He said his wife also had phone conversations with neighbors. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 4 of 25 Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. Mark Peterson, MA Peterson told the Commission he was the lead designer for the project. He said they did draft plans with a basement area; however, because of the requirements the house looked very awkward. Peterson said he believes what was agreed on best fits the site and neighborhood. Peterson thanked the Commission. Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners were in agreement that the house and plans presented were beautiful and fit the scale of the neighborhood very well. The site was not overbuilt. Motion Commissioner Nemerov moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Variance. 6540 Navaho Trail, Edina, MN. Addition to home. Planner Presentation Planner Aaker reported that the applicant is proposing to remodel the existing first floor, add a second floor addition on top of the existing 1st floor of the home, and add a porch to the rear of the home. The existing structure does not meet the required front yard setback of 36.2 feet. The existing 26.4- foot front yard setback is non-conforming. The proposed second floor will match the existing setback but requires a variance given the nonconforming 1st floor. Planner Aaker explained that the existing 27,759 square foot lot is located on the east side of Navaho Trail within the Indian Hills neighborhood. The existing first floor of the house will remain and be remodeled. The new proposed second floor will match the exterior walls of the existing first floor. The existing side yard setback on the south side of the property is 10.2 feet with over 100 feet towards the north side yard. The existing setback on the west side of the house along Navaho Trail is 26.4 feet. The required front yard setback is determined by the front yard setback of the adjacent neighbor. The neighbor to the south provides a front yard setback of 36.2 feet, which is the required Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 5 of 25 front yard setback of the subject home. The subject home has always been forward of the home to the south. The setback of the subject house to the front lot line is currently non-conforming. The proposed project is adding above the existing 1st floor, which is considered adding to the non- conforming setback, so therefore needs a variance. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends approval of a 9.8-foot front yard setback variance for the north property line at 6540 Navaho Trail. as requested subject to the findings, and subject to the following conditions: • Survey date stamped, April 10, 2018 • Elevations and building plans date stamped April 10, 2018 • Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo. Appearing for the Applicant Matthew and Kate Woelffer, Property Owners Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners expressed the following: Planner Aaker was asked if the setback for this house was established by one house. Aaker responded in the affirmative. She said the code was written for grid lots and in large lot areas because of the topography and lot size houses front setback varies. Planner Aaker was asked the maximum roof height. Aaker responded that the subject lot is large allowing roof height up to 40-feet. The new house is proposed at 35-feet. Applicant Presentation Kate Woelffer addressed the Commission and explained they are excited to live in Indian Hills and waited until they found the right house. Woelffer stated their intent was to upgrade the existing house to be more in keeping with the rest of the houses in this neighborhood. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that remodeling the house vs. a tear down rebuilt was a good option. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 6 of 25 Motion Commissioner Berube moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. Variance. 6005 Porter Lane, Edina, MN. Addition. Staff Presentation Planner Bodeker informed the Commission that Dan Wallace, the applicant on behalf of the property owner, has submitted a variance request to exceed the 25% building coverage requirement for residential lots over 9,000 square feet. An existing rear yard accessory structure was removed in November of 2016. The applicant is requesting to reinstall an accessory structure in the rear yard and reduce the size of an existing patio. The proposed project, even with the reduction of the patio, is still over the maximum building coverage allowed by code. The proposed building coverage is 29.4% of the lot area. The building coverage calculations include the house, patio (after the first 150 square feet), and the proposed sauna/shed. It does not include the driveway, sidewalk, special pool, and required pool decking. Planner Bodeker concluded that staff recommends denial of the variance to exceed the 25% building coverage requirement at 6005 Porter Lane. She explained that It is difficult for staff to support or recommend approval of a variance from the code to exceed the building coverage requirement. Staff does not believe there are unique circumstances to the subject property. Staff’s recommendation for denial of the requested variance is based on the following findings: • Historically staff has not recommended approval of lot coverage variances based on all lot coverage requirements being calculated the same on all single-family residential lots. • Variances must be based on the unique characteristics of a lot and not on an owner’s use of the property. • Approving the variance sets a precedent that could negatively affect surrounding properties and neighborhoods with stormwater concerns. Appearing for the Applicant Don Wallace, architect. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners expressed the following: Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 7 of 25 Commissioners observed that the lot was already over on lot coverage pointing out that there is no way to add to the house without requiring a variance. Bodeker agreed. Continuing, Commissioners also stated if the hard cover concern is storm water run-off a rain garden could be added as a condition of approval if the Commission recommends approval of the variance request. Staff was asked if the City had ever considered a similar variance. Planner Teague responded that a lot coverage variance was requested and approved for a property on Stewart. Conditions of approval included reducing existing decking area and construction of a rain garden. A discussion ensued on Edina’s lot coverage requirement and what is and what is not included in lot coverage. It was noted by Commissioners that the City does not differentiate between pervious and impervious surfaces, adding that is something the City should discuss and add it to the Commission Work Plan. Applicant Presentation Mr. Wallace addressed the Commission and explained the property was already over on lot coverage, adding any additions to the property would require a variance. Wallace said modifications would be made to the property to minimize lot coverage. Wallace noted that with the introduction of the special purpose therapy pool and sauna/storage structure lot coverage would be less than what exists today. Continuing, Wallace stated the property owner requires the heated therapy pool and sauna to continue his ongoing physical therapy. Wallace noted a storm water management plan was developed, adding the entire house would be remodeled including the façade with gutters and downspouts added to ensure proper drainage. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Bennett moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. A discussion ensued on the options available to the property owner to achieve the pool and sauna needed for the property owners’ physical therapy. It was noted that what they are trying to achieve does not increase lot coverage and adding a special purpose pool seems reasonable, reiterating that the lot coverage is actually reduced with this proposal. There was a discussion on if granting this variance would create a precedent. A pool and sauna could be considered unnecessary; and there is nothing unique about the subject lot. The discussion further continued on lot coverage, what is and what is not counted and if there should be a consideration for pervious materials. Commissioners asked staff to add a discussion on lot coverage to the Commission Work Plan. Continuing, it was pointed out that every variance should be considered on its own merits; there may be no other similar properties over on lot coverage with the property owner requiring therapy pool. Planning Staff agreed and added Edina does not require a permit for a patio or a “shed” under 200-square feet, adding the City is unsure on “what is out there”. When a plan is presented indicating all surfaces lot coverage Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 8 of 25 can be calculated. There is a 150-squre foot one-time credit for a deck or patio, reiterating a permit is not required for patio. Motion Commissioner Hamilton moved variance approval noting the nonconformity is created by the existing structure and the plan as presented actually reduces lot coverage. Approval is also conditioned on implementing the storm water management plan as presented. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. Ayes; Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Olsen. Nay, Miranda, Lee, Strauss. Motion carried 5-3. D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan for Pentagon Park North. (4820, 4510-4660 77th Street West and 7600 Parklawn Avenue, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Teague reported that Pentagon Revival LLC is requesting an all-housing redevelopment of the Pentagon Park parcels located north of 77th Street. All parcels combined the site is 28.91 acres in size. A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and no Final Development Plan was approved. Teague noted that the use and overall development plan proposed for the north parcel (residential) is very different than the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). At that time, however, the Planning Commission and City Council both expressed a desire to develop this site with some residential uses to create a mixed-use development. Residential uses are permitted under the current MDD-6 zoning designation. The approved preliminary plan contemplated four stories adjacent to Fred Richards Park, and five stories on 77th Street. The Comprehensive Plan allows up to 12 stories; while the current Zoning Ordinance maximum is four stories. At full development build out, the project would include 1,500 new housing units. The overall density would be 52 units per acre. The first phase of the project is proposed by Chase Real Estate Group to develop a 10.86-acre portion of the site (4600-4660 77th Street west), with a 360-unit market rate apartment and a 225-unit senior apartment (585 total units). As proposed, the development would require the following: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density from 30 to 80 units per acre. (This amendment is currently under consideration by the City Council as part of the 7250 France Avenue project and will be acted on May 15th); and Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 9 of 25 Teague explained that the applicant for the first phase does not intend to provide any affordable housing within the project. Pentagon Revival is proposing to dedicate the 4820 site for a 100-unit affordable housing project. However, there is not a development partner that has been signed to construct that housing at this time. The Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The applicant has responded. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson has also reviewed the plans and provided feedback. . The applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council and based on feedback from the Planning Commission, the City Council, the applicant has: Removed two surface lots, including one on 77th Street; Decreased private parking from 310 to 207 surface stalls; Increased the shared Park Parking from 40 to 93 stalls; Increased the underground parking from 442 to 558 stalls; Increase courtyard size, opened up more landscape view, broke up the mass of the buildings; Market-rate plaza entry and corner off West 77th and lobby + common spaces to spill out on for more glass store-front architecture and active corner; Increased green space along 77th and brought the buildings closer to 77th; Added a 3rd public connection to the Park and Nine Mile Creek Trail along the west lot line Added a community dog park; Added a community garden, park benches and public artwork; Improved the architecture with 5th floor setbacks and terraces. Variations in balcony setback and styles. Added a 5th floor clubroom and outdoor terrace over-looking the park. More contemporary design with glass corners; Dedicated land for the Park, including a new driveway connection to the Park including landscaped boulevards, area monument sign, in/out drive lines, parallel parking, 10 foot bike pedestrian trail and perimeter boulevards; and Chase will be building the Park Access road and dedicate the right-of-way to the City in the Phase 1 improvements. Planner Teague noted to accommodate the request; the following Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. The Office Residential area is located west of France Avenue and into the Pentagon Park Area. Teague explained that the OR, Office Residential Area guides up to 30 units per acre. This density is low given the density that has been considered as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study. Densities that have been contemplated to date have been 80 units per acre over the whole of the district. The thinking behind that density has been to allow greater densities in between France and York (100-125 units per acre; the CAC, Community Activity Center allows up to 105 units per acre in the existing Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 10 of 25 Comprehensive Plan); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. Teague stated he would provide findings to support both approval and denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District in the Greater Southdale Area from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and If the Commissioner recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment , approval is based upon the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed-use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. If the Commission recommends denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, denial would be based on the following: 1. The area west of France and south of the Fred Richard Park is considered a transition area between the high-density commercial development on the east side of France and South of 77th Street and the single-family homes to the west and north. 2. The density proposed is too high for this area. Continuing, Teague further informed the Commission he drafted language to support or to deny the rezoning request. If the Commission recommends Rezoning approval the approval should be subject to the following findings: Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 11 of 25 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site and connect to the Regional Trail and Fred Richards Park to the north. Provides the potential for additional public space along the north lot line in conjunction with Fred Richards Park; Opportunity to provide increased stormwater and ponding features in connection to Fred Richards Park; High quality building design; and The potential for significant affordable housing in a future phase of development. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development overall in Pentagon Park where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. h. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the existing roads could support the proposed development and proposed parking, subject to conditions. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 12 of 25 7. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and Fred Richard Park. The project would bring more vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality brick architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project could significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock in the future. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 8. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. Rezoning approval would also be subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Work with the City to expand the public space north of the parking area into the Fred Richards Park including expansion of the dog park area, pedestrian connection and stormwater retention. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. A letter of credit, cash escrow or bond in the amount of $5.85 million be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit to ensure that affordable housing occurs within the development prior to issuance of a building permit. These monies would be given back to the property owner upon delivering the affordable housing units within the development that would meet the City’s affordable housing policy. If the property owner does not deliver the affordable units within 3 years, the City would cash in the money to be used elsewhere in the City to deliver affordable housing. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the sustainability coordinator’s memo dated May 2, 2018. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May 3, 2018. 11. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th Street is required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the applicant/landowner is responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans would be subject to the recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer. 12. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 13 of 25 13. All crosswalks shall be marked with ground-in premark preformed thermoplastic in a standard or “continental” pattern per Edina Standard Plate No. 716 to clearly identify the pedestrian crossings. 14. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-16, Planned Unit Development for this site. 15. Dedication of public access easements along the entrance to Fred Richards Park and the drive aisle and parking stalls along the north lot line subject to review and approval of the city attorney. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the Park. 16. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. If the Commission recommends Rezoning denial, denial is based on the following: Teague stated staff recommends that the City Council deny the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1, subject to the following findings: 1. The proposal does not adequately address the guiding principles regarding Green Streets, Integrated Stormwater, Pedestrian Friendly 77th Street, Connections from West to East, Multimodal Connections and Shared Parking. 2. The proposal does not adequately integrate stormwater into the development. 3. The overall development plan does not meet the Greater Southdale Area development principle of redeveloping property into smaller blocks. The size of these blocks is more like 400 x 600 feet as opposed to 200 x 200 feet suggest in the Framework Vision. The previously approved Overall Development for this site in 2014 better addressed the Development Principles and divided the site into 18 blocks; the proposal divides the site into 7 blocks.4. The proposal does not meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning, including a lack of mixed uses; no affordable housing in Phase 1; no creative or efficient development of the site; lack of creative stormwater management; no podium height. 5. Lack of affordable housing within the project. 6. The current zoning, MDD-6 provides a reasonable use of the property and is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In conclusion, Teague stated staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density to up to 80 units an acre in the OR, Office Residential District. Teague further stated that staff recommends denial of the proposed Rezoning to PUD. Appearing for the Applicant Scott Takenoff and Kristina Smitten Hillcrest Development, Joe McElwain and Andy Chase, Chase Real Estate Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners expressed disappointment that affordable housing was not included in this phase and the difficulty in approving housing without assurances that affordable housing would be built in future Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 14 of 25 phases. It was noted that the MDD-6 zoning designation would continue to work for this project questioning the reasoning behind the request for PUD zoning. Teague agreed that the MDD would work for this project; however, PUD is a tool the City can use to provide affordable housing. Concern was expressed on the parking and that access to the park needs to be more visible. Applicant Presentation Scott Takenoff addressed the Commission and noted that much has changed since their 2014 proposal. Takenoff stated that the site continues to have its challenges, one being the floodplain and the projects interaction with the Fred Richards Golf Course the “Fred” and the 9-mile trail. Takenoff stated this is a big project that would be redeveloped in phases. Kristina Smitten gave a brief history of the property, adding in her opinion this area is very different from France Avenue. She noted that 77th Street is an east/west truck route. Smitten shared the following: • The properties are divided by West 77th Street • The subject properties are near France and the Greater Southdale Area; however there are differences • Tenants have been consolidated in 6 of the office buildings. Occupancy is at 90% in those buildings. • 4 blighted buildings remain; however they can be repositioned to office space if needed. • The south tower was demolished in 2015. • The project follows the principles established for the Pentagon Park area and for the Greater Southdale area. • The project in its entirety provides for flexibility of uses • The north properties are proposed as housing in keeping with the suggestions from the City Council in 2014. • Through numerous neighborhood meetings, the residents of the area expressed the opinion that they are comfortable with the housing option on the north properties. • Although 4820 is not part of this redevelopment proposal that site is earmarked for the affordable housing units (workforce or senior) • There will be connectivity between north south/east west. • The redevelopment would be pedestrian and bike friendly. • Access to trail and park would be provided for not only the residents of the new apartment complex but by the public. • The addition of sidewalks linking properties. • Living street elements would be incorporated into the project. • Access to the “Fred” would follow the living streets guide for both pedestrian and bikes. • Storm water management would be addressed and efficiently measured in the transition zone. Celebrating water as previously thought would be very difficult. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 15 of 25 • Not much can be done to mitigate the flooding issues; however, will work closely with the Watershed District and the City. • Visitors can use the pentagon parking to park for the “Fred”. • Master Plan for the Fred approved in 2017. Access to the Fred comes from this project. • Enhanced bus stops is important. • Public art would be incorporated. Andy Chase addressed the Commission and explained his company has built over 2000 single-family homes and apartments. Chase clarified that his Company is not “dodging” the affordable housing requirement, adding their task within the overall development plan was to construct market rate apartment homes and senior continuum care suites. Chase said they build to own and introduced Joe McElwain to present the project. Mr. McElwain told the Commission he is very happy to introduce Sienna on the Park. McElwain said their goal is to “kick-start” a new residential community in this location. McElwain noted that the site as it exists is a difficult site to redevelop because of the high water table, the 100-year flood plain and unsuitable soils. Mr. McElwain presented the following on the development proposal: • Buildings would be constructed closer to the street. • No parking lots along West 77th Street • Increased shared parking. • Increased underground parking from 442 to 558 stalls • Increased courtyard sizes to open up the site to more landscaped views and to better expose the transition between the project and park. • Sidewalk connections to West 77th, Nine-Mile Creek and the “Fred”. • Enhanced right-of-way connections and enhanced center boulevard • All water would be kept on the property. • Exterior building materials composed of brick, metal panel and concrete masonry. • Buildings would have inset balconies. • Meandering north drive. • Addition of artwork. • The site would allow residents to experience outdoor living • Building height at 5-stories is the correct height. • Residents would be able to experience living in a beautiful park like location with access to amenities. McElwain concluded that they look forward to working with the City. Discussion/Comments/Questions • Commissioners asked the development team to identify where public parking would occur for the park. McElwain pointed out that the shared stall. abut their north property line with the park • Commissioners questioned if smaller building footprints would work to help accommodate a water feature. Mr. Chase responded that developing a water feature would be difficult because Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 16 of 25 of the lowlands. Commissioners expressed disappointment that a water feature was not included in the property reiterating that a different design could be considered to add that feature and provide more transparency to the park. • An opinion was expressed that the buildings and connections would provide a good pedestrian experience; however, there is nowhere to go. It was noted that no retail component was added to this proposal. Mr. McElwain agreed there is no mixed use with this proposed; however, the senior building would provide dining experiences for the residents and residents would also have full amenities to include a library. The market rate apartments would have amenities and they envision rooftop space and work from home areas. McElwain said he is sure that, as the Pentagon Park site is redeveloped that more mixed use would be introduced; noting the mixed use proposed on the south parcel. • The applicant was asked if there would be townhouse units incorporated into one of these buildings. McElwain said there would be no townhouses; however, there would be first floor walkouts. All units would be rental. It was mentioned that different housing types are needed in the City, noting many apartments have recently been built in Edina. Affordable housing was also a goal of the City. Mr. Chase commented with regard to affordable housing that he is confident that affordable housing would be developed in Pentagon Park. He explained that the affordable housing process takes time and as previously mentioned by Ms. Smitten that affordable housing is planned for 4820. A discussion ensued on the proposals connection to the “Fred” with Commissioners expressing the opinion that the connections could be better and more transparent. Commissioners said if it would be difficult for visitors to find a way to access the park from 77th Street. The lack of affordable housing was also of concern to Commissioners. Commissioners also noted there are some concerns that were expressed by Mic Johnson, City Consultant for the Greater Southdale Area. Mr. Takenoff explained that there is no issue in providing affordable housing; however, prior to the affordable housing units being built these buildings need to be built to help facilitate construction of the affordable units. Takenoff said the can provide a purchase agreement with Dominion, reiterating affordable units cannot be built first and that Chase was only responsible for the senior and market rate housing on this site. Commissioners asked Planner Teague if Pentagon Park was considered part of the Greater Southdale Area. Teague responded that had been discussed; however, it was not official. McElwain told the Commission it was difficult to respond to a third party adding their discussions have been with City of Edina staff; however, they have responded to the principles established for the greater Southdale area. An opinion was expressed that the Commission thought they would see something different, something for the future. This development could be missing the point especially without a mix of uses and no assurances that the affordable housing would be built. Mr. McElwain said he could understand their point; however, stressed their charge was to develop market rate and senior housing. It was felt that this development project would “jump start” the redevelopment of the housing for the rest of Pentagon Park to include the affordable component. Smitten pointed out to the Commission the site to be redeveloped by Chase is only one part of the whole. When considering redevelopment of the area Chase considered the principles established for Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 17 of 25 the Pentagon Park area and also considered the Greater Southdale Area Guiding Principles. Chase told the Commission that he was sorry that he was not aware that their proposal would need to include mixed use. A discussion ensued on mixed use, where it was appropriate and if mixed use was still viable. Tankenoff pointed out the Pentagon Park area has been blighted for 30 plus years, his company has been renovating the offices adding the redevelopment vision for the entire site would include mixed use to include office, housing, hotel, restaurant and other amenities. Takenoff stressed that they want this project to work, adding they are very excited about the vision and would rather under promise and over deliver. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. The following resident spoke regarding the proposal. Jim Nelson, 7790 Lochmere Terrace, Edina, MN Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners shared the following: • There was a concern expressed that long term promises could fall away. • A goal for this project was to develop a community with less focus on the car. Focus on a more modern redevelopment approach with public transit, pedestrian trails and bikes. Also safe and easy access north/south. Less reliance on the vehicle. • Trust is very important with this large redevelopment. Concern was expressed that what was envisioned would not be achieved. • Acknowledge that the vision for this important area was to develop a community; something similar to the north loop, build a future community with amenities, parks, connectivity, everything. • Not a bad project; however, it was not what was envisioned. Affordable housing was a major goal and again the City must rely on trust to ensure affordable units are built. This just appears too piecemeal. • Commissioners stated they continue to struggle; while the proposal for housing was good, this plan just misses the vision for housing. Where is the bigger picture; how will it work, will it be built. The discussion continued with Commissioners suggesting that the requested approvals for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Preliminary Rezoning be voted on separately. Support was expressed for amending the Comprehensive Plan; however, a discussion ensued on if the amendment Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 18 of 25 could be site specific. A majority of the Commissioners indicated they could not support the preliminary rezoning as presented, without a mix of uses and without assurances on the affordable housing noting too much was left in the “air”. Motion Commissioner Hamilton moved to recommend the City Council approve of the request for an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Ayes; Miranda, Strauss Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Olsen. Nays; Lee. Motion carried. Commissioner Lee explained she voted no because she believes there are better ways to approve an increase in density instead of amending the entire OR District. Lee stated she believes any approval should be site specific. Lee noted she felt similar with the last months Comprehensive Plan Amendment for 7250 France Avenue. Commissioner Nemerov moved to recommend that the City Council deny the request for Preliminary Rezoning and Development Plan based on staff findings (page 20 of the staff report). Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. Ayes; Miranda, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Olsen. Nays; Lee, Strauss Berube. Motion denied 5-3. E. Preliminary Rezoning, Subdivision & Preliminary Plat for Pentagon Park South (4815 & 4901 77th Street West and 7710 Computer Avenue Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that Solomon Real Estate Group is requesting a Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-17 to develop the vacant 12.5 acre Pentagon South Parcel (4900 77th Street). The first phase would include 11,800 square feet of retail space, a 193-room hotel, a 153-room hotel, and a parking ramp. The second phase would be two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and no Final Development Plan was approved. The uses proposed here are generally consistent with the south portion of the draft overall development plan for Pentagon South. Pentagon Park North will be reviewed as a separate future development, as that plan is very different from the uses and development plan proposed in 2014 (office). Therefore, the applicant is proposing a revised PUD and Overall Development Plan to just include the south parcel. At full development build out, the project would include 225,000 square feet of office space, 2 hotels (346 rooms), 30,800 square feet of retail and two parking structures with a total of 1,545 spaces. As proposed, the development would require the following: Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 19 of 25 Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development, Overall Development Plan; Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1; and Subdivision. Teague explained that the Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The applicant has responded.) The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson, AFO, has also reviewed the plans and provided feedback. The following highlights some of the comments: The plan has retained the central park feature from the draft PUD but at a much reduced scale. In place of larger buildings fronting W. 77th Street, the proposal suggests 2 retail pads with parking and a mixed-use retail/office on the corner of W. 77th and Computer Avenue. This would suggest a more typical suburban development approach, not consistent with primary buildings facing W. 77th as delineated in the approved PUD. Incorporating retail into office buildings could enliven these buildings during more times of day, supporting the goal of a 24/7 community. Having retail, hotel and office surrounding all sides of the central park as outlined in the PUD, along with a direct connection to Pentagon Park North, begins to create a relationship between both sides of 77th. We would suggest moving all components of the proposal closer together with greater density of activity closer to 77th. On grade, parking should be considered as a placeholder for future development and not as part of the overall plan in phase one. The west office-building terrace at the 2nd level should face the park, which would create a stronger semi-urban identity. All building should create program space for street fronting buildings on secondary streets around the whole development. Teague asked the Commission to note that the applicant has gone through the Sketch Plan process before the Planning Commission and City Council. Based on feedback from the Planning Commission, the City Council, the applicant has: Eliminated the drive-through; Reduced the amount of surface parking; Increased setback on Viking Drive from 5 to 10 feet; Increased the setback on Computer Drive from 10 feet to 18 & 20 feet; and Combined the parking structures with buildings. Planner Teague told the Commission that Staff would recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, Subdivision, and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 20 of 25 2. Conformance with the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. Provide a “come to” and “stay at” development with mixed uses, retail, restaurant, public space including seating areas, and a center plaza; High quality buildings and design; Provision of added shared public parking. Public art; and Economic vitality brought to Pentagon Park. 3. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region . d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 4. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary, the PUD zoning would: a. Provides a mixed-use development by including retail, office, hotel and restaurants. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 21 of 25 b. Creates a very pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of sidewalks through and around the site. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with the draft Preliminary Plan, the 2007 Plan, and goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking, subject to road improvements. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. The exterior treatment on the parking garage facing the internal street must be matched on the exterior of the parking garage that faces Bloomington. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May 3, 2018. 9. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations including: A. Addition of a northbound left turn lane, southbound striped left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Commercial Access driveway. B. Addition of a northbound dual left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Computer Avenue. 10. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th Street is required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the applicant/landowner is responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans would be subject to the recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer. 11. All crosswalks shall be marked with “duraprint” type stamping, or whatever is the city standard at the time of installation, to clearly identify the pedestrian crossings. 12. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. 13. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-17, Planned Unit Development for this site. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 22 of 25 Teague concluded that based on the findings outlined above, staff recommends approval of the proposed Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, Subdivision, and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1, subject to the findings and conditions. Appearing for the Applicant Jay Scott, Solomon Real Estate Group Applicant Presentation Scott addressed the Commission and reported he was very happy to be moving forward on this great project. Scott explained that the south development plan would be built in phases with the first phase consisting of two hotels, including the parking garage beneath the south hotel and the two small retail buildings that would frame the front entry to the project. Continuing, Scott said Phase I would include mass grading of the entire property and the installation of all utilities and storm water management systems. Scott noted that the remainder of the property would be graded and seeded and maintained until redevelopment. Scott stated the site would be developed as a mixed-use site intended to increase density and to promote internal connectivity to buildings within the site as well as to connect uses and amenities of the surrounding community. Concluding, Scott said the master plan anticipates a variety of uses including multi-story offices, hotels, retail, restaurants and parking structures to support all uses. Commissioners asked Mr. Scott if their project was market tested and if clients want to locate in this area. Scott responded in the affirmative. Bill Wittrock, RSP addressed the Commission and with graphics highlighted aspects of the project. He pointed out the following: • The proposal maintains a development pattern consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the plan approved in 2014. • An efficient approach to land use was made to promote the health, safety, comfort, and aesthetics of the City. • The project provides sustainable design, new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, storm water management and pedestrian oriented design. • Pentagon Park South further provides for high quality of design that is aesthetically compatible with the surrounding land uses; • Improves the efficiency of public streets and utilities; • Delivers a mix of land uses within the proposed development; and • Established appropriate transitions between land uses. • Safe connection to the “Fred”. The park is considered a large amenity. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 23 of 25 • Bus line connections and intregated bus stops into the plan. • 4-sided buildings. Mr. Wittrock was asked if he received comments from the City Sustainable Coordinator. Wittrock said comments were received and they would develop the site responsibility. Planner Teague added if the Commission were to approve the project as presented, they could include the comments from the Sustainable Coordinator as a condition of approval. The applicant was asked what types of hotels would be built. Steve Olson with Waterwalk told the Commission his company proposes to build an extended stay hotel. The extended stay units would be from one to three bedrooms. The average length of stay averages 77 nights. The hotel would be full service to include dog walkers. Olson said they operate a similar facility in Plymouth. The other hotel is proposed as a dual brand hospitality hotel. The applicant was asked if there would be public art throughout the site. Mr. Wittrock responded in the affirmative. He explained a water feature is planned within the green area to include pathways. Public art would be introduced throughout the campus. Continuing, Wittrock said the entrance into the site was designed to pull people inside. Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Strauss moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners expressed their support for the project indicating this is a step in the right direction and is an excellent use of the PUD process. The applicants were further thanked for the attention they paid to the comments from the Commission and Council at Sketch Plan. Opinions were expressed that the project still feels too suburban; surface parking could be reduced and buildings could be oriented closer to the street; however, it was pointed out not every development needs to be downtown Minneapolis. A discussion ensued on the project, its location and positive impact on the area situated off a highway. Motion Commissioner Hamilton moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Plan approval for Pentagon South based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions to include sustainability requirements. Commissioner Nemerov seconded the motion. Ayes; Miranda, Lee, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube. Nay Olsen. Motion carried 8-1. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 24 of 25 VII. Community Comment None. Commissioner Hamilton moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. VI. Reports/Recommendations None VII. Correspondence And Petitions Chair Olsen acknowledged back of packet materials. VIII. Chair And Member Comments Commissioner Nemerov reported that he and Commissioner Hamilton were happy with the response they received from residents and business owners who want to serve on the 50th and France Small Area Plan Work Group. Commissioner Miranda briefed the Commission on the Edina Senior Bus Service, Met Transit ABRT Commissioner Lee noted that last week the Commission attended a Comprehensive Plan Boards and Commission Workshop. Lee said at this time the Commission should consider their role in the Land Use Chapter and how that chapter would evolve. Commissioner Lee further noted that the Commission should add to their work plan for further study basements yes or no, and pervious and impervious surfaces. IX. Staff Comments Commissioner Bennett asked Planner Teague if there would be a Comp Plan Work Session in two weeks. Teague responded possibly, however, the topic has not been chosen. X. Adjournment Commissioner Hamilton moved to adjourn the May 9, 2018, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 12:05. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Click here to enter a date. Page 25 of 25 Jackie HoogenakkerJackie HoogenakkerJackie HoogenakkerJackie Hoogenakker Respectfully submitted www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 DATE: May 9, 2018 TO: Pentagon Park South Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Tara Brown – Sustainability Division RE: – Pentagon Park South Site Plan Review Staff has reviewed the Sustainable Development Questionnaire provided by the developer. Majority of responses were ‘TBD’. The only commitments for increased sustainable development was increasing the tree canopy from 8.2% to 12% and managing stormwater onsite. If funds are being allocated to a development and to be re-zoned to PUD , the development should meet higher sustainability standards that support healthy living for the residents and environment. Current community goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 30% by 2025 and 80% by 2050. Buildings in the US are responsible for 39% of CO2 emissions, 40% of energy consumption, 13% of water consumption and 15% of GDP per year. It is critical that city funding be invested in developments that will assist the community in reaching its sustainability goal. We are in initial research phase of a Green Building Policy for developments that utilize City funding. Below are gaps identified in current development and higher sustainability standards that would meet the community’s sustainability goal. Below are conditions for approval of a PUD and any funding: • Sustainable Design and Energy Design Assistance - In 2017, 40% of the electricity efficiency in Edina’s commercial sector came from Energy Design Assistance. All buildings greater than 20,000 sq ft should go through the Energy Design Assistance program. Additionally, buildings should be built to B2 2030 Energy Standard. • Sustainable building operations – While a building can be designed to LEED standards, there is no guarantee it will operate at a more efficient manner unless managed and monitored. To ensure the building can operate to the sustainability design standards, the building should be built to and operated through meeting the B3 2030 Energy Standard. There will need to be three years of building energy data inputted into Energy Star Performance Portfolio to receive the SB2030 Building Label. • Renewable energy – These buildings carry a significant footprint which makes it ripe for some form of renewable energy. Hotels have a heavy energy load, and would be a great building to invest in renewables. Whether it’s making the rooves solar ready, utilizing the green space for geo-thermal, or thermal storage within the stormwater storage www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 tanks, there should be some kind of renewable energy use on site to lower the carbon footprint and reduce operating energy costs. • Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure - Current EV penetration in the Edina market is 3% with anticipated penetration to grow to 10% in the coming decade. There are currently 1,422 parking stalls planned for this development. At the very least, each ramp needs to have four electric vehicle parking spaces with EV charging capabilities and have 5% of the parking spaces should be EV capable as future tenants request access. There should be an additional two EV charging spots in Lot 1 or Lot 2 of the proposal for easier access on the north side of the development. A request of 10 EV Charging parking spaces would take up 0.7% of the current parking spots. EV charging capacity not only meets the sustainability needs, but is becoming a differentiator and selling point for retailers, hoteliers, and both office and residential rental properties. • Energy Star appliances in Businesses – Energy Star appliances are not only for residential uses, but for commercial businesses on site. For example, a commercial kitchen uses three times the amount of energy per square foot than most other types of commercial buildings. Through the Xcel and Centerpoint Energy Design Assistance process and through negotiations with business tenants, it will be critical to identify the appliances that should be Energy Star rated and save the business 10% - 30% in energy expenses overtime. • Organics recycling – One of the top barriers to future organics recycling is space to collect and space at hauler pick up for additional bins. If the space is not designed in original plans, the cost to make room has been too high for many to take on this additional service in the future. All collection spots within the building and areas outside the building for trash collection must have space for three or more bins: recycling, organics recycling, and waste bins. Page 2 Development Questionnaire Over What this is: A brief questionnaire to help community decision makers understand how this development aligns with key focus area of sustainability that ensures both developers and the community long-term value. Why? Through the 2014 Visioning process, environmental stewardship is one of seven strategic focus areas. Vision Edina’s Environmental Stewardship states: “There is a growing awareness of the impact that the built environment has on the natural environment, and the individual and collective responsibility we all have towards good environmental stewardship. Community residents and stakeholders believe that Edina can take an active and ambitious internal and regional leadership role in promoting more comprehensive recycling, smart building, and energy efficiency practices. These themes couple well with the parallel benefits in smarter urban planning, increased transportation options, and application of technology.” Questions Answers Sustainable Design & Energy Have you utilized Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? May be considered at SD phase Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals and/or will they be Energy Star certified? If not, please share the steps you are taking to support energy conservation. Sustainability and energy conservation strategies will be implemented throughout, though specifics have not been determined yet. Will you be optimizing the roof by installing a green roof? Each building will be determined based on type, tenant and conditions Will there be any renewable energy generation on site? Wind and solar may be used where appropriate Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)? Comments: This project will be guided by sustainable building practices. However, while only being at the site plan stage, it is too early to know specifics of which specific strategies and solutions will be implemented until further into the design process. Managing Water What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 25.8 25.3 What new services will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking) Landscape planter areas, park areas, street boulevards, and pervious pavement areas. Development Questionnaire Over How will the landscaping support the natural ecosystem? (i.e. Rain gardens, % native plants, % bee friendly pollinator plants) Landscaping for the site will include a large variety of perennials and flowering trees and shrubs. The landscape plan proposes many native plant material with a variety of pollinator plants that will bloom at different times of the year. Comments: Stormwater will be managed on the site by utilizing pervious pavements to encourage surface infiltration and below-ground storage tanks that will control runoff rates, provide stormwater treatment and infiltration, and also provide significant floodplain storage. Managing Tree Canopy What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment? What is the percent post development? 8.2 12.0 Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)? The public plaza area and larger open planting areas will have larger than ordinance-required tree sizes. In those locations the larger trees will have a better chance of survival. Ordinance- sized trees are proposed in the more typical planting areas since they will better acclimate and Development Questionnaire Over survive in the available planting area. Comments: Managing Waste Will a recycling service be provided to all businesses on site? Yes Will an organic (i.e. food waste) recycling service be provided to all businesses on site? No Comments: In partnering with the specific users for the property, we will incorporate organic recycling services based upon the needs and desires of the users. Sustainable Transportation Will there be bike parking near main entrance for guests? TBD Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners or guests to use? TBD Will there be parking spaces provided for car-sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars? Yes Comments: We will have significant bike parking within the overall project and at various location throughout the property and within various buildings. Specific locations will be determined as the site and building plans are finalized. EV Charging Stations are envisioned to be a part of the office buildings when they are constructed. If there is an need and interest from the hotel or retail users within the project, EV Charging Stations can be added where appropriate to meet those needs. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-50 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM MDD-6, MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PUD-17, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 17, INCLUDING A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PHASE 1 AND A SUBDIVISION FOR SOLOMON REAL ESTATE GROUP BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Solomon Real Estate Group is requesting a Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-17 to develop the vacant 12.5 acre Pentagon South Parcel. The first phase would include 11,800 square feet of retail space, a 193-room hotel, a 153 room hotel, and a parking ramp. The second phase would be two 5-story office buildings, a parking ramp and 19,000 square feet of office/retail. At full development build out, the project would include 225,000 square feet of office space, 2 hotels (346 rooms), 30,800 square feet of retail and two parking structures with a total of 1,545 spaces. 1.02 A Preliminary Rezoning to PUD with a draft Overall Development Plan was approved for these parcels for an office development in 2014, however, no Final Rezoning was sought and no Final Development Plan was approved. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A. 1.04 To accommodate the request, the following is required: Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development, Overall Development Plan; Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1; and Subdivision. 1.05 On May 9, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requests. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.06 On June 5, 2018 the City Council had a public hearing and considered the requests. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: Approval is subject to the following findings: RESOLUTION NO. 2018-50 Page 2 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Conformance with the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. Provide a “come to” and “stay at” development with mixed uses, retail, restaurant, public space including seating areas, and a center plaza; High quality buildings and design; Provision of added shared public parking. Public art; and Economic vitality brought to Pentagon Park. 3. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. Buildings “step down” at boundaries with lower-density districts and upper stories “step back” from street. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-50 Page 3 iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 4. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Provides a mixed-use development by including retail, office, hotel and restaurants. b. Creates a very pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of sidewalks through and around the site. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with the draft Preliminary Plan, the 2007 Plan, and goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking, subject to road improvements. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan, Subdivision, and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated April 10, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. The exterior treatment on the parking garage facing the internal street must be matched on the exterior of the parking garage that faces Bloomington. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-50 Page 4 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated May 3, 2018. 9. Compliance with the WSB Traffic & Parking Study recommendations including: A. Addition of a northbound left turn lane, southbound striped left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Commercial Access driveway. B. Addition of a northbound dual left turn lane and eastbound right turn lane at 77th Street and Computer Avenue. 10. Per the Master Development Agreement, dated May 20, 2014, reconstruction of 77th Street is required with the construction of 100,000 square feet. Therefore, the applicant/landowner is responsible for roadway improvements to 77th Street. Final plans would be subject to the recommendations in the WSB traffic study and approval of the city engineer. 11. All crosswalks shall be marked with “duraprint” type stamping, or whatever is the city standard at the time of installation, to clearly identify the pedestrian crossings. 12. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. 13. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-17, Planned Unit Development for this site. 14. Compliance with the recommendation in the city’s sustainability coordinator’s memo dated May 9, 2018. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on June 5, 2018. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-50 Page 5 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 5, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION ORDINANCE NO. 2018-11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-17, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-17 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-17 (PUD-17) Pentagon Park South (a) Legal description: See attached Exhibit A (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on _________, 2018 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2018-___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the MDD-6 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the MDD-3-6 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. Required Setbacks - Buildings 77th Street Computer Avenue Normandale Boulevard Viking Drive 15 feet 15 feet 50 feet 10 Feet Building Height 12 stories & 144 feet per the height overlay district Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet Building Coverage 30% 2 (g) Signs shall be regulated per the Mixed Development District. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.5% Parking Stalls – Mixed Development District 1,422 stalls at full buildout Pentagon Park (South) –Rezoning including an Overall Development Plan and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1 www.EdinaMN.gov 2 www.EdinaMN.gov 3 www.EdinaMN.gov 4 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 www.EdinaMN.gov 6 www.EdinaMN.gov 7 www.EdinaMN.gov 8 www.EdinaMN.gov 9 www.EdinaMN.gov 10 www.EdinaMN.gov 11 Sketch Plan Revisions from Sketch Plan: EdinaMN.gov 12 Eliminated the drive-through; Increased setback on Viking Drive from 5 to 10 feet; Increased the setback on Computer Drive from 10 feet to 18 & 20 feet; and Combined the parking structures with buildings. www.EdinaMN.gov 13 www.EdinaMN.gov 14 www.EdinaMN.gov 15 www.EdinaMN.gov 16 www.EdinaMN.gov 17 www.EdinaMN.gov 18 www.EdinaMN.gov 19 www.EdinaMN.gov 20 www.EdinaMN.gov 21 www.EdinaMN.gov 22 www.EdinaMN.gov 23 www.EdinaMN.gov 24 www.EdinaMN.gov 25 www.EdinaMN.gov 26 Request Requires: Rezoning from MDD-6 to PUD-17, Planned Unit Development, Overall Development Plan; Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1; and Subdivision. www.EdinaMN.gov 27 Review of the Site Plan EdinaMN.gov 28 www.EdinaMN.gov 29 www.EdinaMN.gov 30 City Standard (MDD-6) Proposed –PUD Rough Estimates Setbacks - Buildings Front Setback Setbacks -Parking Structures 35 feet + ½ foot for each foot the building height exceeds minimum setback 20 feet or the height of the structure 17, 25, & 30 feet (77th Street)* 18 & 20 feet (Computer Ave)* 50 Feet (Normandale Blvd.)* 10 feet (Viking Drive)* Building Height 12 stories south of 77th Street 6 stories Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street)20 feet Building Coverage 30%29% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50% -Non-residential Uses 50% -Residential Uses 527,947 SF Total 494,000 s.f. mixed use Parking Stalls –Mixed Development District 1,718 required 1,422 proposed* Primary Issues Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site? EdinaMN.gov 31 PUD Justification EdinaMN.gov 32 1.Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included:  Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site.  Provide a “come to” and “stay at” development with mixed uses, retail, restaurant, public space including seating areas, and a center plaza;  High quality buildings and design;  Provision of added shared public parking.  Public art; and  Economic vitality brought to Pentagon Park. www.EdinaMN.gov 33 PUD Justification EdinaMN.gov 34 2.The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, including: Ped. friendly environment, encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities, enhance commercial areas, increase mixed use development, 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. a. Provides a mixed-use development by including retail, office, hotel and restaurants. b. Creates a very pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of sidewalks through and around the site. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with the draft Preliminary Plan, the 2007 Plan, and goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. PUD Justification EdinaMN.gov 35 4.The existing roadways and parking would support the project. The WSB traffic impact study concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking, subject to roadway improvements. Recommendation EdinaMN.gov 36 www.EdinaMN.gov 37 Recommendation EdinaMN.gov 38 www.EdinaMN.gov 39 www.EdinaMN.gov 40 www.EdinaMN.gov 41 www.EdinaMN.gov 42 www.EdinaMN.gov 43 www.EdinaMN.gov 44 www.EdinaMN.gov 45 www.EdinaMN.gov 46 www.EdinaMN.gov 47 www.EdinaMN.gov 48 PUD Justification The Plan does not meet the Greater Southdale Area Development Principle and the 2014 draft Overall Development Plan of dividing the site into smaller blocks. The previously approved Overall Development for this site in 2014 better addressed the Development Principles and divided the site into 18 blocks; the proposal divides the site into 7 blocks. www.EdinaMN.gov 49 www.EdinaMN.gov 50 www.EdinaMN.gov 51 PUD Justification The proposal does not adequately meet the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. (See pages 10-12 of this report.) The proposal would not create a more creative and efficient approach to development of the site. As mentioned above, the Overall Development Plan proposal divides the property up into 7 very large blocks, rather than 18 as recommended in the 2014 Preliminary Rezoning/Overall Development Plan for the site. The City’s sustainability coordinator has reviewed the proposal and has offered recommendations to improve sustainability. (See attached memo dated May 2, 2018.) On its own, this project is entirely residential and not mixed use. Lack of affordable housing within the project. While the proposal is to construct100 units of affordable housing within the overall development, staff is concerned that there are no guarantees for this future development. www.EdinaMN.gov 52 www.EdinaMN.gov 53 www.EdinaMN.gov 54 www.EdinaMN.gov 55 www.EdinaMN.gov 56 www.EdinaMN.gov 57 www.EdinaMN.gov 58 www.EdinaMN.gov 59 www.EdinaMN.gov 60 www.EdinaMN.gov 61 www.EdinaMN.gov 62 EdinaMN.gov 63 www.EdinaMN.gov 64 www.EdinaMN.gov 65 www.EdinaMN.gov 66 www.EdinaMN.gov 67 www.EdinaMN.gov 68 www.EdinaMN.gov 69 www.EdinaMN.gov 70 www.EdinaMN.gov 71 www.EdinaMN.gov 72 www.EdinaMN.gov 73 Questions? www.EdinaMN.gov 74 www.EdinaMN.gov 75 www.EdinaMN.gov 76 Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:Don Uram, F inance Director Item Activity: Subject:R es olution No. 2018-51: Awarding the S ale of $5,780,000 G eneral O bligation Bonds, S eries 2018A Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt R esolution No. 2018-51 Awarding the sale of $5,780,000 General Obligation Bonds, S eries 2018A. I N TR O D U C TI O N: Attached is the resolution awarding the sale of bonds as drafted by the City's bond counsel, D orsey & Whitney. T he Bonds are being issued by the C ity, pursuant to M innesota Statutes, Chapters 429, 444, and 475. T he series 2018A issue will not count against the City's debt limit because C hapter 429 allows cities to issue debt without limitation as long as at least 20% of the project is expected to be paid from assessments and C hapter 444 allows cities to issue debt without limitation as long as debt service is expected to be paid from water and sewer revenues. T he $5,780,000 General Obligation Bonds, S eries 2018A has three purposes: 1. $2,280,000 is for 2018 local street improvements and will be repaid with special assessments over a fifteen year period starting in 2019. Benefitting properties are expected to be assessed in Fall 2018. 2. $1,990,000 is for water utility improvements and will be repaid with water revenue over a ten year period. 3. $1,510,000 is for storm sewer utility improvements and will be repaid with storm sewer revenue over a ten year period. T he various 2018 projects also include $565,000 of sanitary sewer improvements which will be financed by surplus revenue in the U tility Fund. T he bids will be received and tabulated by the City's financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. on Tuesday, June 5. Ehlers and C ity staff will present the bids to the City Council at the J une 5 C ouncil meeting. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Bond Resolution No. 2018-51 - Edina 2018A S&P Rating Report Moody's Rating Report Edina Bond Sale Day Report Revised Resolution No. 2018-51 Series 2018A Staff Pres entation 4827-2352-0613\2 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $5,780,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2018A Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on June 5, 2018 at 7:00 o’clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): RESOLUTION NO. _________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $5,780,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2018A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this ______ day of June, 2018. _________________________________________ Debra Mangen, City Clerk 4827-2352-0613\2 It was reported that [_______] ([__]) proposals had been received prior to 11:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $5,780,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A of the City in accordance with the Preliminary Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] 4827-2352-0613\2 Councilmember ___________________________ then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. ___________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $5,780,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2018A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City”), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-70, adopted on August 16, 2005, the City created a revolving fund as contemplated by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 7a (the “Act”), designated as the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund, and established certain accounts within such Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. The City owns and operates a municipal storm sewer utility (the “Storm Water Utility”) and a municipal water utility (the “Water Utility,” which together with the Storm Water Utility is called the “Utilities”). This Council hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the City to issue its $5,780,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A (the “Bonds”) for the purpose of (i) financing from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the cost of the construction of various local street improvement projects designated as Concord A & G, West 62nd Street, Normandale Park D, Chowen Park D, Bredesen Park A, and Country Club C (together, the “Improvements”); and (ii) financing various improvements to the Utilities, including water and storm sewer improvement projects (together, the “Utilities Improvements”). This Council hereby determines to issue and sell the Bonds to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in making the Improvements and the Utilities Improvements, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65. The portion of the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements are referred to as the “Improvement Bonds” and are issued pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Chapter 475, and the portion of the Bonds issued to finance the Utilities Improvements are designated as the “Utilities Bonds” and are issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 and Chapter 475. The allocation of the Bonds for this purpose is set forth in Section 2.01 hereof. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent municipal advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, [_________] ([__]) -2- 4827-2352-0613\2 proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of [____________________________], of [_________], and associates (the “Purchaser”), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $[_____________], the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.04. Performance of Requirements. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, to issue and sell the Utilities Bonds to pay the costs of the Utilities Improvements, and to pledge to the payment of the Utilities Bonds net revenues to be derived from charges for the service, use and availability of the Utilities. The City presently has certain outstanding obligations which constitute a lien on the net revenues of the Utilities. Such obligations permit further pledges and appropriations of net revenues of the Utilities to be made superior or subordinate to or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation of net revenues of the Utilities to pay such obligations. The City Council hereby determines that the estimated net revenues of the Utilities will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to or projected to be used, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Utilities Bonds and such outstanding obligations which constitute a lien on the net revenues of the Utilities. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Utilities Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Utilities Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Utilities Bonds forthwith. 1.05. Maturities. This Council finds and determines that the maturities of the Improvement Bonds, as set forth in Section 2.01 hereof, are warranted by the anticipated collection of the assessments to be levied for the cost of the Improvements. Section 2. Bond Terms; Registration; Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; Payment. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A, shall be originally dated as of June 28, 2018, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall bear interest, computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, from June 28, 2018, until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: -3- 4827-2352-0613\2 Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2020 2028 2021 2029 2022 2030 2023 2031 2024 2032 2025 2033 2026 2034 2027 2035 [REVISE MATURITY SCHEDULE FOR TERM BONDS] The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Improvement Bonds: -4- 4827-2352-0613\2 Year Amount Year Amount 2020 2028 2021 2029 2022 2030 2023 2031 2024 2032 2025 2033 2026 2034 2027 The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Utilities Bonds: Year Water Utility Storm Utility Total 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2019, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the “Registrar”). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or -5- 4827-2352-0613\2 more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner’s order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already -6- 4827-2352-0613\2 matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. (j) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Paying Agent. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days’ notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the year 2028 and later years shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 2027, and on any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing on February 1, 20__ are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: Bonds Maturing on February 1, 20 Sinking Fund Aggregate Payment Date Principal Amount] Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption thereof to be published as required by law and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds -7- 4827-2352-0613\2 to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.06. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2.08. Use of Securities Depository; Book-Entry Only System. The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book-Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the “DTC Participants”), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the -8- 4827-2352-0613\2 Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the “Beneficial Owners”). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC’s nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words “CEDE & CO.” in this Resolution shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City’s obligations with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book-Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book-Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, -9- 4827-2352-0613\2 whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (e) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of principal and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. (f) In the event that the Book-Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued, except as provided in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book-Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements with the securities depository described herein, and thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository’s rights under clause (e) above. Section 3. Use of Proceeds. 3.01. General Obligation Bonds, Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund. The City hereby establishes within the Construction Fund of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund a special subbaccount designated as the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund (the “Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund”) as a separate bookkeeping account on its books and records. There shall be deposited into the Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund, when and as received, proceeds of the Improvement Bonds in the amount of $[____________]. There shall be established a separate account within the Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund to record expenditures for each Improvement. The moneys in the Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund will be disbursed by the City, in accordance with this Resolution and the City’s normal procedures, to pay (or reimburse the City for) the costs of the Improvements, including the issuance costs of the Improvement Bonds pursuant to Section 9 hereof. At such time as the Improvements are completed the City shall transfer any remaining balance in the Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund as provided in Resolution No. 2005-70. 3.02. General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund. There is hereby established in the official books and records of the City, a separate General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund (the “Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund”). The City hereby appropriates to the Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund proceeds of the Utilities Bonds in the amount of $[____________]. The Series 2018A Utilities -10- 4827-2352-0613\2 Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Utilities Improvements, including but not limited to the transfer to the Utilities Bond Fund created in Section 4.02 hereof, of amounts sufficient for the payment of interest due upon the Utilities Bonds prior to the completion of the Utilities Improvements and the payment of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Utilities Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Utilities Improvements, any balance of the proceeds of Utilities Bonds remaining in the Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund may be used to pay the cost, in whole or in part, of any other improvements to the Utilities, as directed by the City Council, but any balance of such proceeds not so used shall be credited and paid to the Utilities Bond Fund. Section 4. Bond Funds. 4.01. General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2018A Bond Fund. So long as any of the Improvement Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City shall maintain a separate debt service fund on its official books and records to be known as the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2018A Bond Fund (the “Improvement Bond Fund”) within the Debt Service Account of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (the “Debt Service Account”), and the principal of and interest on the Improvement Bonds shall be payable from the Improvement Bond Fund. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Improvement Bond Fund (a) proceeds of the Improvement Bonds in the amount of $[______________]; (b) all moneys transferred with respect to the Improvement Bonds from other accounts within the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Debt Service Account; and (c) all other moneys as shall be appropriated by the City Council to the Improvement Bond Fund from time to time. On the business day preceding each date on which principal of or interest on the Improvement Bonds are to be paid by the City in accordance with this Resolution, the City Finance Director shall, without further direction by the Council, transfer from the Debt Service Account in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Improvement Bond Fund an amount sufficient to pay such principal and interest. If the aggregate balance in the Improvement Bond Fund is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all Improvement Bonds payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any fund of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund when the balance therein is sufficient, and the City Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient amount of ad valorem taxes to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or statutory limitation. 4.02. Utilities Bond Fund. The Utilities Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Utilities Bonds, Series 2018A Bond Fund (the “Utilities Bond Fund”), which the City agrees to maintain until the Utilities Bonds have been paid in full. If the balance in the Utilities Bond Fund is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on bonds payable therefrom, the City Finance Director shall nevertheless provide sufficient money from any other funds of the City which are available for that purpose, and such other funds shall be reimbursed from subsequent receipts of net revenues of the Utilities appropriated to the Utilities Bond Fund and, if necessary, from the proceeds of the taxes levied for the Utilities Bond Fund. The City Finance Director shall deposit in the Utilities Bond Fund (a) proceeds of the Utilities Bonds in -11- 4827-2352-0613\2 the amount of $[______________] and (b) all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of such bonds and interest, including the net revenues of the Utilities herein pledged and appropriated to the Utilities Bond Fund and all collections of any ad valorem taxes levied for the payment of the Utilities Bonds. Section 5. Levy of Special Assessments; Full Faith and Credit Pledged. 5.01. Levy of Special Assessments. The City hereby covenants and agrees that for payment of the cost of each of the Improvements it will do and perform all acts and things necessary for the full and valid levy of special assessments against all assessable lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefor, based upon the benefits received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less than twenty percent (20%) of the cost of the Improvements. In the event that any such assessment shall be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by the City or this Council or any of the City’s officers or employees, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and this Council hereby covenant and agree that they will forthwith do all such further acts and take all such further proceedings as may be required by law to make such assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property. The Council presently estimates that the special assessments levied for payment of the cost of the Improvements shall be in the principal amount of $2,280,000 payable in not more than 15 installments, the first installment to be collectible with taxes during the year 2020, and that deferred installments shall bear interest at the rate of 4.150% per annum from the date of the resolution levying said assessment until December 31 of the year in which the installment is payable. 5.02. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and the interest on the Bonds, and the Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Funds in accordance with the provisions and covenants contained in this Resolution. It is estimated that the special assessments levied and to be levied for the payment of the Improvements and net revenues of the Utilities pledged to the payment of the Utilities Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent (5%) in excess of the annual principal and interest requirements of the Improvement Bonds and Utilities Bonds. Section 6. Imposition of Charges; Additional Bonds. The City hereby covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Utilities Bonds that so long as any of the Utilities Bonds are outstanding, the City will impose and collect reasonable charges for the service, use and availability of the Utilities to the City and its inhabitants according to schedules calculated to produce net revenues which, will be sufficient to pay all principal and interest when due on the Utilities Bonds and all other obligations payable from the net revenues of the Utilities. Net revenues of the Utilities, to the extent necessary, are hereby irrevocably pledged and appropriated to the payment of the principal of the Utilities Bonds and interest thereon, provided that nothing herein shall preclude the City from hereafter making further pledges and -12- 4827-2352-0613\2 appropriations of net revenues of the Utilities for the payment of additional obligations of the City hereafter authorized if the City Council determines before the authorization of such additional obligations that the estimated net revenues of the Utilities will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to or projected to be used, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Utilities Bonds and paid therefrom and such additional obligations. Such further pledges and appropriations of said net revenues may be made superior or subordinate to or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation herein made, as to the application of net revenues received from time to time. Section 7. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank or trust company qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder’s option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 8. County Auditor Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money, Arbitrage and Official Statement. 8.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 8.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. -13- 4827-2352-0613\2 8.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Regulations”) as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered “private activity bonds” or “private loan bonds” pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 8.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this Resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 8.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 8.06. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2-12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. 8.07. Reimbursement. The City certifies that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure with respect to the financed facilities which the City paid or will have paid more than 60 days prior to the issuance of the Bonds unless, with respect to such prior expenditures, the City shall have made a declaration of official intent which complies with the provisions of Section 1.150-2 of the Regulations, provided that a declaration of official intent shall not be required (i) with respect to certain de minimis expenditures, if any, with respect to the financed facilities meeting the requirements of Section 1.150-2(f)(1) of the Regulations, or (ii) with respect to “preliminary expenditures” for the financed facilities as defined in Section 1.150-2(f)(2) of the Regulations, including engineering or architectural -14- 4827-2352-0613\2 expenses and similar preparatory expenses, which in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the “issue price” of the Bonds. 8.08. Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. The City Council hereby designates the Bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code relating to the disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions, and hereby finds that the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt governmental obligations (within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code) which will be issued by the City and all subordinate entities during calendar year 2018 does not exceed $10,000,000. Section 9. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the Purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2-12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the Rule), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds. The City is the only obligated person in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this section, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this section, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this section constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this section, Owner or Bondowner means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any Beneficial Owner (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, Beneficial Owner means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (ii) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before twelve months after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the Disclosure Information): -15- 4827-2352-0613\2 (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) to the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type contained in the Official Statement under headings: “VALUATIONS—Current Property Valuations,” “DEBT—Direct Debt,” and “TAX RATES, LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS—Tax Levies and Collections” and “GENERAL INFORMATION—US Census Data-Population Trend” and “—Employment / Unemployment Data,” which information may be unaudited. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been filed with the SEC or have been made available to the public on the Internet Web site of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the MSRB. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) hereof), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this section is amended as permitted by this paragraph (b)(1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of ten business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events (each a Material Fact): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; -16- 4827-2352-0613\2 (B) Non-payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (H) Bond calls, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entry into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; and (N) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. As used herein, for those events that must be reported if material, an event is “material” if it is an event as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, an event is also “material” if it is an event that would be deemed material for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. For the purposes of the event identified in (L) hereinabove, the event is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for an obligated person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person, or if such jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person. -17- 4827-2352-0613\2 (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (b)(1) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this section pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under subsection (d)(2); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this section pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). (2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this section shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this section shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this section will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This section (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) hereof) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the -18- 4827-2352-0613\2 effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this section as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This section is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 10. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds. The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Klein Bank, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City’s financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. Adopted this 5th day of June, 2018. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember ______________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: -19- 4827-2352-0613\2 and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. A-1 4827-2352-0613\2 EXHIBIT A BOND FORM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2018A R- $________ Interest Rate Maturity Date Date of Original Issue CUSIP ____% February 1, 20__ June 28, 2018 REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2019 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. A-2 4827-2352-0613\2 This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $5,780,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to serial number, maturity date, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on June 5, 2018 (the “Resolution”), to maintain the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund of the City, a permanent fund established for the financing of local improvements for which special assessments may be levied against property specifically benefited thereby, and to finance the costs of improvements to the storm sewer utility and to the water utility of the City and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Section 444.075 and Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered Bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds of this issue maturing in 2028 and earlier years are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in 2027 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds maturing on the same date, on February 1, 2027 and any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. [Bonds maturing in the year 20__ shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium.] At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of the Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bond or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon the partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner’s attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City A-3 4827-2352-0613\2 will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The Bonds have been designated as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” pursuant to Section 265(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied or agreed to levy special assessments on property specially benefited by the improvements financed by the Bonds collectible in the years and amounts required to produce sums not less than five percent in excess of the principal of and interest on such portion of the Bonds as such principal and interest respectively become due, and has appropriated such special assessments to the Revenue Account (the Revenue Account) of its Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund previously established by the City; and that, on or before each date the City is obligated to pay principal of or interest on such portion of the Bonds, the City will transfer from its Revenue Account to a separate General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2018A Bond Fund an amount sufficient for the payment of such principal and interest on such date; and the City has pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds net revenues of the storm water utility and water utility of the City; that in and by the Resolution, the City has covenanted and agreed with the owner of the Bonds that it will impose and collect charges for the service, use and availability of its storm water utility and water utility at the time and in the amounts required to produce net revenues adequate to pay all principal of and interest on the Bonds and on all other bonds payable from net revenues of the storm water utility and water utility as such principal and interest respectively become due; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. A-4 4827-2352-0613\2 This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. CITY OF EDINA ___________________________________ __________________________________ City Manager Mayor CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants UTMA …………….. Custodian …………………. in common (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act………………. TEN ENT -- as tenants (State) by entireties JT TEN -- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common A-5 4827-2352-0613\2 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. _______________________ ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________________________________________________________________ the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints ____________________________________________________________________ attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER NOTICE: The signature(s) to this assignment OF ASSIGNEE: must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration, enlargement or any change / / whatsoever. Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an “eligible guarantor institution” meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medallion Program (STAMP) or such other “signature guaranty program” as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 4827-2352-0613\2 COUNTY AUDITOR’S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on June 5, 2018, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $5,780,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A, dated as of June 28, 2018. I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. WITNESS my hand and official seal this ______ day of __________, 2018. County Auditor (SEAL) Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation Primary Credit Analyst: Cora Bruemmer, Chicago + 1 (312) 233 7099; cora.bruemmer@spglobal.com Secondary Contact: Scott Nees, Chicago (1) 312-233-7064; scott.nees@spglobal.com Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Related Research WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 25, 2018 1 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation Credit Profile US$5.78 mil GO bnds ser 2018A due 02/01/2035 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable New Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Rationale S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'AAA' long-term rating to Edina, Minn.'s series 2018A general obligation (GO) bonds. At the same time, we affirmed our 'AAA' long-term rating on the city's existing GO debt and our 'AA+' long-term rating on its existing lease-revenue debt issued by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA). The outlook on all ratings is stable. The city's unlimited-tax, full faith and credit GO pledge secures the series 2018A bonds. Proceeds will finance the city's 2018 street and utility improvement projects. Some of the city's outstanding GO debt is additionally secured by various revenue sources, but all existing GO debt is rated to the GO pledge. The 'AA+' appropriation rating is based on the city's pledge to annually appropriate the necessary lease payments to make annual debt service; accordingly, the lease bonds are rated one notch below the city's general credit-worthiness. The city's GO bonds are eligible to be rated above the sovereign because we believe the city can maintain better credit characteristics than the U.S. in a stress scenario. Under our criteria, titled "Ratings Above The Sovereign—Corporate And Government Ratings: Methodology And Assumptions" (published Nov. 19, 2013, on RatingsDirect), U.S. local governments are considered to have moderate sensitivity to country risk. The institutional framework in the U.S. is predictable for local governments, allowing them significant autonomy, independent treasury management, with no history of federal government intervention, and we believe Edina's financial flexibility is sufficiently demonstrated by its very strong budgetary reserves and liquidity. The ratings reflect our assessment of the following factors for Edina, specifically its: • Very strong economy, with access to a broad and diverse metropolitan statistical area (MSA); • Very strong management, with "good" financial policies and practices under our Financial Management Assessment (FMA) methodology and the ability to consistently maintain balanced operations; • Strong budgetary performance, with operating surpluses in the general fund and at the total governmental fund level in fiscal 2017; WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 25, 2018 2 • Very strong budgetary flexibility, with an available fund balance in fiscal 2017 of 90% of operating expenditures; • Very strong liquidity, with total government available cash at 143.1% of total governmental fund expenditures and 10.9x governmental debt service, and access to external liquidity we consider strong; • Adequate debt and contingent liability position, with debt service carrying charges at 13.1% of expenditures and net direct debt that is 160.9% of total governmental fund revenue, as well as rapid amortization, with 75.9% of debt scheduled to be retired in 10 years; and • Strong institutional framework score. Very strong economy We consider Edina's economy very strong. The city, with an estimated population of 50,889, is in Hennepin County in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington MSA, which we consider to be broad and diverse. The city has a projected per capita effective buying income of 205% of the national level and per capita market value of $230,535. Overall, market value grew by 4.1% over the past year to $11.7 billion in 2017. The county unemployment rate was 3.4% in 2016. Edina remains one of the Twin Cities' premiere, wealthy, inner-ring suburbs. Despite being fully built-out, the city has seen substantial growth over the last five years, as residents and business owners tear down and replace older homes and buildings with new construction. There have been over 750 teardowns since 2012. In addition, luxury residential buildings are being added in already-developed areas, especially around the Southdale shopping area. Over 1,700 apartment units have been added since 2012, and 600 more have been approved for development. All of this new development has resulted in over a 30% increase in the city's net tax capacity over the last five years. We expect the growth to continue, and therefore believe that the city's economy will remain very strong. Very strong management We view the city's management as very strong, with "good" financial policies and practices under our FMA methodology, indicating financial practices exist in most areas, but that governance officials might not formalize or monitor all of them on a regular basis. In addition, our assessment of management indicates the city's consistent maintenance of balanced operations. Over the past three years, general fund operating results have ranged from 4.0% to 8.1%. The city council adopts a detailed two-year budget and maintains a five-year capital improvement plan (CIP) that is updated every two years and identifies sources and uses of funds. The council reviews budget-to-actual results during quarterly workshops. Edina meets its policy to maintain an unassigned general fund balance at 42% to 47% of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue. When the unassigned fund balance falls below or exceeds this range, the city council then either creates a plan to restore fund balance or considers transferring the excess to other funds. In the past several years, the council has made transfers to the construction fund. It also has its own debt management policy. Edina has its own investment policy, but historically only reported on investment holdings to the council annually. In the future, it is planning to do reporting on a quarterly basis. Strong budgetary performance Edina's budgetary performance is strong, in our opinion. The city had operating surpluses of 8.1% of expenditures in the general fund and 6.6% across all governmental funds in fiscal 2017. Our assessment accounts for the fact that we expect budgetary results could deteriorate somewhat from 2017 results in the near term. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 25, 2018 3 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation We have adjusted 2017 figures to exclude a discretionary transfer of the prior-year surplus from the general fund to the construction fund, in line with the city's fund balance policy. We adjusted total governmental fund revenue to include recurring transfers from its enterprise funds. We also adjusted 2017 total governmental fund expenditures to exclude debt service related to refundings. The 2017 budget called for balanced operations, but the year closed $3 million better than budget due to strong building permit and ambulance fee revenue, as well as lower expenditures. The 2018 budget also calls for balanced operations. Year-to-date, management reports that revenue and expenditures are tracking in line with budget. Given the city's history of outperforming its budget and its growing revenue related to the ongoing development, we believe it is likely the year will close with another surplus. Similarly, the city has demonstrated strong performance across total governmental funds, after adjustments for one-time expenditures, which we expect to continue. The city's golf course, arena, and nonmajor enterprise funds' performance has been somewhat weaker. These funds rely on partial support from the city's liquor enterprise fund. Officials have a long-term plan to improve golf course operations. It has closed one course and is reconstructing the existing 27-hole course into an 18-hole championship course that will elevate the quality of its golf operations. Because the golf course was closed for renovations during all of fiscal 2017, the fund reported a large $2.2 million deficit, including an $875,000 one-time disposal of assets related to the old golf course. The course is still undergoing construction during fiscal 2018, so management expects another deficit, although not as large as in fiscal 2017. The city is optimistic that the golf course fund will be able to achieve break-even operation in fiscal 2019 or 2020. Officials expect the other enterprises (Ice Arena, Aquatic Center, Arts Center, and Centennial Lakes Park) to continue to require subsidies from the liquor fund, though management would like to reduce the support that they require. Historically, the enterprises have not required general fund support because the operating deficits have been relatively small, and strong operations in the city's liquor enterprise have provided enough cushion. The city has a locally derived revenue base: Over two-thirds of its total governmental fund revenue is from local taxes (including property taxes, tax-increment and special assessments, and franchise taxes). We believe property taxes are a stable revenue source for Edina, and the city is insulated from fluctuations in state or federal revenue. Very strong budgetary flexibility Edina's budgetary flexibility is very strong, in our view, with an available fund balance in fiscal 2017 of 90% of operating expenditures, or $34.0 million. We expect the available fund balance to remain above 30% of expenditures for the current and next fiscal years, which we view as a positive credit factor. The available fund balance includes $17.4 million (45.8% of expenditures) in the general fund and $16.6 million (44%) that is outside the general fund but legally available for operations. The amount of available fund balance outside the general fund consists of the liquor fund's unrestricted balance ($929,183) and the assigned portion of the construction fund balance ($15.7 million), which the general fund contributes to each year through transfers. The construction fund portion has been growing each year, and while it is assigned for capital purposes (equipment, vehicles, etc.), it could be reassigned for general operations at any time without restrictions. We expect general fund reserves to remain in compliance with the city's policy to maintain 42%-47% of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue, and so we expect budgetary flexibility will remain very WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 25, 2018 4 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation strong. Very strong liquidity In our opinion, Edina's liquidity is very strong, with total government available cash at 143.1% of total governmental fund expenditures and 10.9x governmental debt service in 2017. In our view, the city has strong access to external liquidity if necessary. The city has issued bonds frequently during the past 15 years and maintains a strong credit profile, so we believe it would have strong market access if needed for external liquidity. The city recently moved a large portion of its cash to an outside investment advisor. The majority of its investments remain in municipal securities, U.S. agencies, and U.S. treasury bonds and notes, though it does have a small amount in commercial paper. Overall, we do not view these investments as aggressive. Edina has no direct-purchase or variable-rate debt. We expect its liquidity profile to remain very strong. Adequate debt and contingent liability profile In our view, Edina's debt and contingent liability profile is adequate. Total governmental fund debt service is 13.1% of total governmental fund expenditures, and net direct debt is 160.9% of total governmental fund revenue. Approximately 75.9% of the direct debt is scheduled to be repaid within 10 years, which is, in our view, a positive credit factor. The city plans to issue approximately $20 million of GO debt over the next two years for street and utility improvements. Additionally, it has identified a $15 million project related to its water plant for which it could issue debt in 2019, though management expects it will likely be later than that. Depending on the size and timing of these issuances, the city's debt profile could weaken. However, we do not believe such a change will have a material effect on the overall credit quality given its other strengths. Edina's combined required pension and actual other postemployment benefit (OPEB) contributions totaled 4.8% of total governmental fund expenditures in 2017. The city made its full annual required pension contribution in 2017. It participates in two cost-sharing multiple-employer defined-benefit pension plans, including the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). Required pension contributions to these plans are determined by state statute. Statutory contributions rates have generally not kept pace with actuarially determined contribution (ADC) rates, indicating potential for future payment acceleration. The GERF and PEPFF were 75.9% and 85.4% funded, respectively, in fiscal 2017. The city's proportionate share of the net pension liability for these plans totaled $28.5 million in fiscal 2017. We consider historical plan funding levels somewhat weak, and we believe that the history of pension contributions below ADC increases the risk of payment acceleration. Additionally, in our view, the plan's investment portfolio is exposed to significant market risk, with only 22% of its investments allocated to fixed income and cash, which increases the risk for volatility in plan funding levels. Despite these weaknesses, we believe the city has sufficient taxing and operational flexibility to manage future increases in pension contributions. However, in the future, if pension contributions absorb a larger share of the city's budget, our view of its debt and contingent liability profile could weaken. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 25, 2018 5 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation The city is legally required to include any retirees in the same insurance pool as its active employees, but the premiums are paid by the retiree, resulting in an implicit rate subsidy. The city funds its OPEBs on a pay-as-you-go basis. As of Jan. 1, 2016, the most recent actuarial valuation date, the city's unfunded actuarial accrued liability was $2.5 million. Strong institutional framework The institutional framework score for Minnesota cities with a population greater than 2,500 is strong. Outlook The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Edina will maintain its strong budgetary performance and very strong budgetary flexibility and liquidity, supported by very strong management and a robust tax base. Given these very strong credit quality characteristics, including access to the Minneapolis-St. Paul MSA, we do not anticipate changing the rating within the two-year outlook horizon. Downside scenario Significant financial deterioration could result in a lower rating, but we do not expect that to occur. Related Research • S&P Public Finance Local GO Criteria: How We Adjust Data For Analytic Consistency, Sept. 12, 2013 • Incorporating GASB 67 And 68: Evaluating Pension/OPEB Obligations Under Standard & Poor's U.S. Local Government GO Criteria, Sept. 2, 2015 Ratings Detail (As Of May 25, 2018) Edina GO recreational rev bnds ser 2017B dtd 06/29/2017 due 02/01/2033 Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO CIP rfdg bnds Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 25, 2018 6 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation Ratings Detail (As Of May 25, 2018) (cont.) Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina GO Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina Hsg & Redev Auth, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota Edina Hsg & Redev Auth (Edina) Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Edina Hsg & Redev Auth (Edina) APPROP Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Edina Hsg & Redev Auth (Edina) APPROP Long Term Rating AA+/Stable Affirmed Certain terms used in this report, particularly certain adjectives used to express our view on rating relevant factors, have specific meanings ascribed to them in our criteria, and should therefore be read in conjunction with such criteria. Please see Ratings Criteria at www.standardandpoors.com for further information. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.capitaliq.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on S&P Global Ratings' public website at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column. WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 25, 2018 7 Summary: Edina, Minnesota; Appropriations; General Obligation WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT MAY 25, 2018 8 STANDARD & POOR’S, S&P and RATINGSDIRECT are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Copyright © 2018 by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE CREDIT OPINION 29 May 2018 Contacts Brandi Head +1.312.706.9976 VP-Senior Analyst brandi.head@moodys.com Adebola Kushimo +1.214.979.6847 VP-Senior Analyst adebola.kushimo@moodys.com CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 Edina (City of) MN Update to credit analysis Summary Edina, MN (Aaa) benefits from a large tax base and above average income indices in the twin cities area. Another credit strength is the city's history of healthy reserve balances supported by strong financial management and budgeting practices. The city's credit profile is constrained by an elevated, growing debt burden as a result of ongoing growth in the local area requiring infrastructure improvements. The city's fixed costs are elevated when compared to operating revenues due to its combined debt and pension burden. Credit strengths »Large and affluent tax base located in the twin cities metropolitan area »Healthy operating reserves and liquidity Credit challenges »Above average debt and pension burdens relative to operations Rating outlook Outlooks are generally not applicable for local government credits with this amount of debt. Factors that could lead to an upgrade »Not applicable Factors that could lead to a downgrade »Narrowing of operating reserves and liquidity »Growth in the city's debt or pension burden MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE Key indicators Exhibit 1 Edina (City of) MN 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Economy/Tax Base Total Full Value ($000)$9,360,281 $9,322,091 $9,922,330 $10,890,198 $11,272,241 Population 48,155 48,574 48,940 49,373 49,976 Full Value Per Capita $194,378 $191,915 $202,745 $220,570 $225,553 Median Family Income (% of US Median)185.5% 190.4% 198.7% 197.2% 201.5% Finances Operating Revenue ($000)$39,514 $40,146 $42,105 $41,742 $46,505 Fund Balance ($000)$21,151 $20,235 $20,223 $20,508 $23,385 Cash Balance ($000)$24,248 $22,120 $29,355 $22,321 $30,422 Fund Balance as a % of Revenues 53.5% 50.4% 48.0% 49.1% 50.3% Cash Balance as a % of Revenues 61.4% 55.1% 69.7% 53.5%65.4% Debt/Pensions Net Direct Debt ($000)$61,719 $61,972 $78,921 $79,965 $81,918 3-Year Average of Moody's ANPL ($000)$75,326 $81,311 $91,265 $87,121 $100,228 Net Direct Debt / Operating Revenues (x)1.6x 1.5x 1.9x 1.9x 1.8x Net Direct Debt / Full Value (%)0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% 0.7% Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Revenues (x) 1.9x 2.0x 2.2x 2.1x 2.2x Moody's - adjusted Net Pension Liability (3-yr average) to Full Value (%) 0.8% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 0.9% Source: Moody's Investors Service, City of Edina's, MN audited financial statements, and U.S. Census Bureau Profile The City of Edina encompasses an area of approximately 16.5 square miles in Hennepin County (Aaa stable) and is a southwestern suburb in the Minneapolis (Aa1 negative) metropolitan area. The city's population is currently estimated at nearly 50,000. Detailed credit considerations Economy and tax base: affluent and mature Twin Cities suburb exhibiting growth Edina's tax base will maintain long-term stability due to its high resident income levels, favorable location and continued development. The city is a wealthy inner-ring twin cities suburb located in Hennepin County bordering western Minneapolis. Edina's substantial $11.7 billion tax base, as measured by economic market value, grew by 4.6% annually over the five years ending in 2017 due to continued residential and commercial development. Full value is expected to increase to $12 billion for the upcoming year with $187 million in construction, 65% of which will be residential. One of the city's larger employers, International Dairy Queen headquarters, will be moving its offices two miles away to Bloomington. The move will not materially impact the city's employment base, and the company is not a major taxpayer. Officials report stable operations and collections among larger employers and taxpayers. As of March 2018, the city's unemployment rate of 2.4% was lower than both state (3.8%) and national (4.1%) levels for the same time period. The city's resident income levels are high, with the median family income estimated at 201.5% of the US. Full value per capita is very strong at $225,553. Financial operations and reserves: strong financial position, strong liquor fund performance mitigates poor performance of other non-essential enterprises The city's financial operations will remain stable given recent and expected growth in its property tax base. The city's primary revenue source is property taxes, which comprised 63.8% of fiscal 2016 operating fund revenues. The second largest revenue sources are This publication does not announce a credit rating action. For any credit ratings referenced in this publication, please see the ratings tab on the issuer/entity page on www.moodys.com for the most updated credit rating action information and rating history. 2 29 May 2018 Edina (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE charges for services and licenses and permits (combined 21%) of operating revenues. Notably, these revenues have been increasing since 2009 due to continued development activity. The city's general fund closed fiscal 2016 on December 31, 2016, with an available (unassigned plus committed plus assigned) balance of $16.2 million, or a healthy 40.9% of general fund revenues. The city's general fund surplus of $2.9 million would have been larger but for a $805,000 transfer to the construction fund in fiscal 2016. The city has historically transferred prior-year surplus revenues to the construction fund to finance capital investments on a pay-go basis. The construction fund held $13.7 million in reserves at the end of 2016. Across the city's major operating funds (general and debt service), the city closed fiscal 2016 with an available fund balance of $23.4 million, or a healthy 50.3% of operating revenues. Although fiscal 2017 audited statements are not yet available, officials report a $1.2 million surplus, well in line with its adopted budget, primarily due to favorable license and permit revenues, as well as good expense planning. For fiscal 2018, officials have adopted a balanced budget. The city's municipal liquor fund provides modest support to a city-owned golf course and ice arena. Transfers to the two enterprises combined were $350,000 and $485,000 million in fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively. The liquor fund had a surplus of over $100,000 after transfers and held a cash balance of $1.2 million in fiscal 2016. The combined golf course and arena expenditures are small compared with governmental activities at approximately 12% of the city's operating fund revenues. LIQUIDITY The city closed fiscal 2016 with an unrestricted cash and investment balance of $30.4 million, or 65% of operating fund revenues. Debt and pensions: above average debt and pension obligations compared with operations The city's debt and pension burden will remain above average. Following an upcoming bond issue for road and utility improvements, the city's net direct debt will total $81 million, which is above average at 1.74x operating revenues, though more moderate compared with the tax base at 0.72% of full value. More than half of the city's outstanding GOULT debt is expected to be repaid with special assessments. Officials report special assessments are levied on occupied existing properties and that collection rates are generally high. In fiscal 2019, the city anticipates the need for $15 million additional debt for a water treatment plant. Given ongoing growth within the city, its five-year capital improvement plan incorporates a total of $30 - $40 million in debt through 2021 for more utility and street improvements. The city’s three year average Moody's Adjusted Net pension Liability (ANPL) totals $100.2 million, equal to 0.9% of full value and 2.2x fiscal 2016 operating revenue. The city’s reported unfunded net pension liability, based on an 7.5% discount rate, was $51.9 million. While relatively consistent in recent years, pension costs will likely grow because statutory contribution levels have not kept pace with growing unfunded liabilities in state-wide pension plans. The city’s total fixed costs, inclusive of debt service and retirement contributions, were 22% of fiscal 2016 operating fund revenues. DEBT STRUCTURE All of the city's debt is fixed rate and 75.8% of principal is scheduled to be retired within ten years. DEBT-RELATED DERIVATIVES The city is not a party to any derivative agreements. PENSIONS AND OPEB The city participates in two multiple-employer cost-sharing plans, the General Employees Retirement Fund (GERF) and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF). While ultimately dependent on state legislative action, pension contributions will likely rise due to growing unfunded liabilities. Growing pension costs could pressure Minnesota cities’ operating budgets. Minnesota statutes establish local government retirement contributions as a share of annual payroll. The employer contribution rates are currently set at 7.5% of payroll for GERF and at 16.2% of payroll for PEPFF. The city’s total fiscal 2016 pension contribution was $2.4 million, or 5.3% of operating revenues. In fiscal 2016, contributions to PEPFF from all participating governments in aggregate amounted to only 91.9% of the plan’s “tread water” indictor. Employer contributions that tread water equal the sum of current year service cost and interest on reported net pension liabilities at the start of the year. If plan assumptions are met exactly, contributions equal to the tread water indicator will prevent the reported net pension liabilities from growing. 3 29 May 2018 Edina (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE Other post-employment benefit (OPEB) obligations do not represent a material credit risk for the city. The city does not offer explicit OPEB benefits, but allows retired employees to stay on its health care plan, creating an implicit rate subsidy. The city’s most recent unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) was $2.5 million. Management and governance: strong institutional framework reflects capacity to adjust revenue and expenditures Minnesota cities have an Institutional Framework score of Aa, which is high compared to the nation. Institutional Framework scores measure a sector's legal ability to increase revenues and decrease expenditures. The sector has one or more major revenue sources that are not subject to any caps. Revenues tend to be predictable, as cities rely primarily on property taxes and state Local Government Aid (LGA), which is distributed based on demographic and tax base factors. Revenue-raising flexibility is moderate as cities generally benefit from unlimited levying authority, except during years in which the state has imposed limits. Levy limits are not in place for the 2018-2019 biennium. Across the sector, fixed and mandated costs are generally moderate. Minnesota has public sector unions, which can limit the ability to cut expenditures. Expenditures mostly consist of personnel costs, which are highly predictable. The city's formal fund balance policy is to maintain 42% to 47% of the next year's tax revenues in unassigned fund balance, while transferring any surplus out of operating funds for purposes designated by the City Council. In fiscal 2016, the city reported an unassigned general fund balance of $14.6 million, consistent with policy. 4 29 May 2018 Edina (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE © 2018 Moody’s Corporation, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., Moody’s Analytics, Inc. and/or their licensors and affiliates (collectively, “MOODY’S”). All rights reserved. CREDIT RATINGS ISSUED BY MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. AND ITS RATINGS AFFILIATES (“MIS”) ARE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES, AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY INCLUDE MOODY’S CURRENT OPINIONS OF THE RELATIVE FUTURE CREDIT RISK OF ENTITIES, CREDIT COMMITMENTS, OR DEBT OR DEBT-LIKE SECURITIES. MOODY’S DEFINES CREDIT RISK AS THE RISK THAT AN ENTITY MAY NOT MEET ITS CONTRACTUAL, FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AS THEY COME DUE AND ANY ESTIMATED FINANCIAL LOSS IN THE EVENT OF DEFAULT. CREDIT RATINGS DO NOT ADDRESS ANY OTHER RISK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: LIQUIDITY RISK, MARKET VALUE RISK, OR PRICE VOLATILITY. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S OPINIONS INCLUDED IN MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT STATEMENTS OF CURRENT OR HISTORICAL FACT. MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS MAY ALSO INCLUDE QUANTITATIVE MODEL-BASED ESTIMATES OF CREDIT RISK AND RELATED OPINIONS OR COMMENTARY PUBLISHED BY MOODY’S ANALYTICS, INC. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS DO NOT CONSTITUTE OR PROVIDE INVESTMENT OR FINANCIAL ADVICE, AND CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT AND DO NOT PROVIDE RECOMMENDATIONS TO PURCHASE, SELL, OR HOLD PARTICULAR SECURITIES. NEITHER CREDIT RATINGS NOR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS COMMENT ON THE SUITABILITY OF AN INVESTMENT FOR ANY PARTICULAR INVESTOR. MOODY’S ISSUES ITS CREDIT RATINGS AND PUBLISHES MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WITH THE EXPECTATION AND UNDERSTANDING THAT EACH INVESTOR WILL, WITH DUE CARE, MAKE ITS OWN STUDY AND EVALUATION OF EACH SECURITY THAT IS UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PURCHASE, HOLDING, OR SALE. MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY RETAIL INVESTORS AND IT WOULD BE RECKLESS AND INAPPROPRIATE FOR RETAIL INVESTORS TO USE MOODY’S CREDIT RATINGS OR MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS WHEN MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION. IF IN DOUBT YOU SHOULD CONTACT YOUR FINANCIAL OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL ADVISER. ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COPYRIGHT LAW, AND NONE OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED, FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD, OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT MOODY’S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. CREDIT RATINGS AND MOODY’S PUBLICATIONS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR USE BY ANY PERSON AS A BENCHMARK AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES AND MUST NOT BE USED IN ANY WAY THAT COULD RESULT IN THEM BEING CONSIDERED A BENCHMARK. All information contained herein is obtained by MOODY’S from sources believed by it to be accurate and reliable. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as well as other factors, however, all information contained herein is provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind. MOODY'S adopts all necessary measures so that the information it uses in assigning a credit rating is of sufficient quality and from sources MOODY'S considers to be reliable including, when appropriate, independent third-party sources. However, MOODY’S is not an auditor and cannot in every instance independently verify or validate information received in the rating process or in preparing the Moody’s publications. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability to any person or entity for any indirect, special, consequential, or incidental losses or damages whatsoever arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information, even if MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers is advised in advance of the possibility of such losses or damages, including but not limited to: (a) any loss of present or prospective profits or (b) any loss or damage arising where the relevant financial instrument is not the subject of a particular credit rating assigned by MOODY’S. To the extent permitted by law, MOODY’S and its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors and suppliers disclaim liability for any direct or compensatory losses or damages caused to any person or entity, including but not limited to by any negligence (but excluding fraud, willful misconduct or any other type of liability that, for the avoidance of doubt, by law cannot be excluded) on the part of, or any contingency within or beyond the control of, MOODY’S or any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, representatives, licensors or suppliers, arising from or in connection with the information contained herein or the use of or inability to use any such information. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY’S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody’s Corporation (“MCO”), hereby discloses that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to approximately $2,500,000. MCO and MIS also maintain policies and procedures to address the independence of MIS’s ratings and rating processes. Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually at www.moodys.com under the heading “Investor Relations — Corporate Governance — Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy.” Additional terms for Australia only: Any publication into Australia of this document is pursuant to the Australian Financial Services License of MOODY’S affiliate, Moody’s Investors Service Pty Limited ABN 61 003 399 657AFSL 336969 and/or Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd ABN 94 105 136 972 AFSL 383569 (as applicable). This document is intended to be provided only to “wholesale clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. By continuing to access this document from within Australia, you represent to MOODY’S that you are, or are accessing the document as a representative of, a “wholesale client” and that neither you nor the entity you represent will directly or indirectly disseminate this document or its contents to “retail clients” within the meaning of section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. MOODY’S credit rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a debt obligation of the issuer, not on the equity securities of the issuer or any form of security that is available to retail investors. It would be reckless and inappropriate for retail investors to use MOODY’S credit ratings or publications when making an investment decision. If in doubt you should contact your financial or other professional adviser. Additional terms for Japan only: Moody's Japan K.K. (“MJKK”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of Moody's Group Japan G.K., which is wholly-owned by Moody’s Overseas Holdings Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of MCO. Moody’s SF Japan K.K. (“MSFJ”) is a wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary of MJKK. MSFJ is not a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”). Therefore, credit ratings assigned by MSFJ are Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings. Non-NRSRO Credit Ratings are assigned by an entity that is not a NRSRO and, consequently, the rated obligation will not qualify for certain types of treatment under U.S. laws. MJKK and MSFJ are credit rating agencies registered with the Japan Financial Services Agency and their registration numbers are FSA Commissioner (Ratings) No. 2 and 3 respectively. MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) hereby disclose that most issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds, debentures, notes and commercial paper) and preferred stock rated by MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) have, prior to assignment of any rating, agreed to pay to MJKK or MSFJ (as applicable) for appraisal and rating services rendered by it fees ranging from JPY200,000 to approximately JPY350,000,000. MJKK and MSFJ also maintain policies and procedures to address Japanese regulatory requirements. REPORT NUMBER 1126458 5 29 May 2018 Edina (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE U.S. PUBLIC FINANCE CLIENT SERVICES Americas 1-212-553-1653 Asia Pacific 852-3551-3077 Japan 81-3-5408-4100 EMEA 44-20-7772-5454 6 29 May 2018 Edina (City of) MN: Update to credit analysis June 5, 2018 Sale Day Report for City of Edina, Minnesota $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Prepared by: Nick Anhut, CIPMA Senior Municipal Advisor and Bruce Kimmel, CIPMA Senior Municipal Advisor Sale Day Report City of Edina, Minnesota June 5, 2018 Sale Day Report – June 5, 2018 City of Edina, Minnesota $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Purpose: Financing for various 2018 street and utility public improvement projects within the Ci ty. Rating Affirmed : Moody's Investor's Service "Aaa" and S&P Global Ratings "AAA" Number of Bids: 6 Low Bidder: Baird, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Comparison from Lowest to Highest Bid: (TIC as bid) Low Bid High Bid Interest Difference 2.7006% 2.8845% $84,420 Summary of Results: Presale Estimates: Results of Sale Principal Amount*: $5,780,000 $5,515,000 Reoffering Premi um: $0 $262,305 Prepaid Assessments : $909,348 $909,348 Underwriter’s Discount: ($46,240) ($45,666) Capitalized Interest: ($105,715) ($112,956) Costs of Issuance: ($80,000) ($72,875) Net Proceeds for Projects : $6,457,393 $6,455,156 True Interest Cost *: 2.9796% 2.7053% Yield: 2.00 – 3.45% 1.75% - 3.15% Total Net P&I: $6,974,582 $6,826,279 Notes: *The final principal amount was reduced due to the reoffering premium within the winning bid and lower than budgeted financing costs. The final True Interest Cost figure is recalcula ted to reflect the adjustment. Closing Date: June 27, 2018 City Council Action: Adopt a resolution authorizing issuance, awarding sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A . Attachments: • Bid Tabulation • Sources and Uses of Funds • Updated Debt Service Schedules • Bond Resolution (Draft distributed in City Council Packets ) BID TABULATION $5,780,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A City of Edina, Minnesota SALE: June 5, 2018 AWARD: BAIRD Rating: Moody's Investor's Service "Aaa" S&P Global Ratings "AAA" BBI: 3.78% Bank Qualified NAME OF BIDDER MATURITY (February 1) RATE REOFFERING YIELD PRICE NET INTEREST COST TRUE INTEREST RATE BAIRD $6,006,437.95 $1,249,201.43 2.7006% Milwaukee, Wisconsin 2020 3.000% 1.750% C.L. King & Associates WMBE Dougherty & Company, LLC Vining-Sparks IBG, Limited Partnership Edward Jones Fidelity Capital Markets SAMCO Capital Markets WNJ Capital Crews & Associates, Inc. Davenport & Co. L.L.C. Duncan-Williams, Inc. Ross, Sinclaire & Associates, LLC Loop Capital Markets Country Club Bank Oppenheimer & Co. SumRidge Partners R. Seelaus & Company., Inc. Sierra Pacific Securities Isaak Bond Investments, Inc IFS Securities First Empire Securities UMB Bank,N.A. W.H. Mell Associates Wayne Hummer & Co. FMS Bonds Inc. First Kentucky Securities Corp. Midland Securities Alamo Capital WMBE Multi-Bank Securities Inc. First Southern Securities Wedbush Securities Inc. 2021 3.000% 1.850% 2022 3.000% 1.900% 2023 3.000% 2.000% 2024 3.000% 2.150% 2025 4.000% 2.300% 2026 4.000% 2.400% 2027 4.000% 2.500% 2028 3.000% 2.600% 2029 3.000% 2.700% 20301 3.000% 2.850% 20311 3.000% 2.850% 20322 3.000% 3.000% 20332 3.000% 3.000% 20343 3.125% 3.150% 20353 3.125% 3.150% * Subsequent to bid opening the issue size was decreased to $5,515,000. Adjusted Price - $5,731,639.83 Adjusted Net Interest Cost - $1,207,595.91 Adjusted TIC - 2.7053% 1 $315,000 Term Bond due 2031 with mandatory redemption in 2030. 2 $335,000 Term Bond due 2033 with mandatory redemption in 2032. 3 $355,000 Term Bond due 2035 with mandatory redemption in 2034. NAME OF BIDDER MATURITY (February 1) RATE REOFFERING YIELD PRICE NET INTEREST COST TRUE INTEREST RATE Bid Tabulation June 5, 2018 City of Edina, Minnesota $5,780,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Page 2 STIFEL, NICOLAUS $5,900,896.30 $1,243,719.10 2.7148% Birmingham, Alabama 2020 3.000% 2021 3.000% 2022 3.000% 2023 3.000% 2024 3.000% 2025 3.000% 2026 3.000% 2027 3.000% 2028 3.000% 2029 3.000% 2030 3.000% 2031 3.000% 2032 3.000% 2033 3.125% 2034 3.125% 2035 3.125% PIPER JAFFRAY $6,219,027.70 $1,288,372.16 2.7241% Minneapolis, Minnesota 2020 4.000% 2021 4.000% 2022 4.000% 2023 4.000% 2024 4.000% 2025 4.000% 2026 4.000% 2027 4.000% 2028 4.000% 2029 4.000% 2030 4.000% 2031 4.000% 2032 3.000% 2033 3.000% 2034 3.500% 2035 3.500% NAME OF BIDDER MATURITY (February 1) RATE REOFFERING YIELD PRICE NET INTEREST COST TRUE INTEREST RATE Bid Tabulation June 5, 2018 City of Edina, Minnesota $5,780,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Page 3 NORTHLAND SECURITIES, INC. $6,030,994.50 $1,300,892.10 2.8165% Minneapolis, Minnesota 2020 3.000% 2021 4.000% 2022 4.000% 2023 4.000% 2024 4.000% 2025 4.000% 2026 4.000% 2027 4.000% 2028 3.000% 2029 3.000% 2030 3.000% 2031 3.000% 2032 3.000% 2033 3.000% 2034 3.125% 2035 3.125% FTN FINANCIAL CAPITAL MARKETS $5,889,473.85 $1,317,979.07 2.8727% Memphis, Tennessee 2020 3.000% 2021 3.000% 2022 3.000% 2023 3.000% 2024 3.000% 2025 3.000% 2026 3.000% 2027 3.000% 2028 3.000% 2029 3.000% 2030 3.500% 2031 3.500% 2032 3.500% 2033 3.500% 2034 3.500% 2035 3.500% NAME OF BIDDER MATURITY (February 1) RATE REOFFERING YIELD PRICE NET INTEREST COST TRUE INTEREST RATE Bid Tabulation June 5, 2018 City of Edina, Minnesota $5,780,000* General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Page 4 RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. $6,032,629.50 $1,333,621.68 2.8845% Memphis, Tennessee 2020 4.000% 2021 4.000% 2022 4.000% 2023 4.000% 2024 4.000% 2025 4.000% 2026 4.000% 2027 4.000% 2028 3.000% 2029 3.000% 2030 3.250% 2031 3.250% 2032 3.250% 2033 3.250% 2034 3.250% 2035 3.250% City of Edina, Minnesota $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Issue Summary Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 06/27/2018 | Delivered 06/27/2018 PIR Water Storm Issue Summary Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds $2,210,000.00 $1,880,000.00 $1,425,000.00 $5,515,000.00 Reoffering Premium 74,787.70 106,775.30 80,742.55 262,305.55 Prepaid Assessments 909,348.00 --909,348.00 Total Sources $3,194,135.70 $1,986,775.30 $1,505,742.55 $6,686,653.55 Uses Of Funds Total Underwriter's Discount (0.828%)18,299.41 15,566.92 11,799.39 45,665.72 Costs of Issuance 31,274.60 24,842.24 16,758.16 72,875.00 Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund 112,956.43 --112,956.43 Deposit to Project Construction Fund 3,031,605.26 1,946,366.14 1,477,185.00 6,455,156.40 Total Uses $3,194,135.70 $1,986,775.30 $1,505,742.55 $6,686,653.55 Series 2018A GO Bonds - F | Issue Summary | 6/ 5/2018 | 11:41 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Issue Summary Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 06/27/2018 ----- 02/01/2019 --107,204.34 107,204.34 107,204.34 08/01/2019 --90,171.88 90,171.88 - 02/01/2020 285,000.00 3.000%90,171.88 375,171.88 465,343.76 08/01/2020 --85,896.88 85,896.88 - 02/01/2021 405,000.00 3.000%85,896.88 490,896.88 576,793.76 08/01/2021 --79,821.88 79,821.88 - 02/01/2022 420,000.00 3.000%79,821.88 499,821.88 579,643.76 08/01/2022 --73,521.88 73,521.88 - 02/01/2023 440,000.00 3.000%73,521.88 513,521.88 587,043.76 08/01/2023 --66,921.88 66,921.88 - 02/01/2024 455,000.00 3.000%66,921.88 521,921.88 588,843.76 08/01/2024 --60,096.88 60,096.88 - 02/01/2025 460,000.00 4.000%60,096.88 520,096.88 580,193.76 08/01/2025 --50,896.88 50,896.88 - 02/01/2026 480,000.00 4.000%50,896.88 530,896.88 581,793.76 08/01/2026 --41,296.88 41,296.88 - 02/01/2027 505,000.00 4.000%41,296.88 546,296.88 587,593.76 08/01/2027 --31,196.88 31,196.88 - 02/01/2028 520,000.00 3.000%31,196.88 551,196.88 582,393.76 08/01/2028 --23,396.88 23,396.88 - 02/01/2029 540,000.00 3.000%23,396.88 563,396.88 586,793.76 08/01/2029 --15,296.88 15,296.88 - 02/01/2030 155,000.00 3.000%15,296.88 170,296.88 185,593.76 08/01/2030 --12,971.88 12,971.88 - 02/01/2031 160,000.00 3.000%12,971.88 172,971.88 185,943.76 08/01/2031 --10,571.88 10,571.88 - 02/01/2032 165,000.00 3.000%10,571.88 175,571.88 186,143.76 08/01/2032 --8,096.88 8,096.88 - 02/01/2033 170,000.00 3.000%8,096.88 178,096.88 186,193.76 08/01/2033 --5,546.88 5,546.88 - 02/01/2034 175,000.00 3.125%5,546.88 180,546.88 186,093.76 08/01/2034 --2,812.50 2,812.50 - 02/01/2035 180,000.00 3.125%2,812.50 182,812.50 185,625.00 Total $5,515,000.00 -$1,424,235.74 $6,939,235.74 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $43,563.36 Average Life 7.899 Years Average Coupon 3.2693431% Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.7720449% True Interest Cost (TIC)2.7053309% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.5755674% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)2.8937033% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 2.5600496% Weighted Average Maturity 7.856 Years Series 2018A GO Bonds - F | Issue Summary | 6/ 5/2018 | 11:41 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Issue Summary Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I CIF Net New D/S 105% of Total Assessments Water Revenue Storm Revenue Levy/ (Surplus) 02/01/2019 --107,204.34 107,204.34 (42,112.67)65,091.67 68,346.25 -38,885.58 29,460.67 - 02/01/2020 285,000.00 3.000%180,343.76 465,343.76 (70,843.76)394,500.00 414,225.00 -233,415.00 180,810.00 - 02/01/2021 405,000.00 3.000%171,793.76 576,793.76 -576,793.76 605,633.45 201,781.44 233,625.00 176,872.50 (6,645.49) 02/01/2022 420,000.00 3.000%159,643.76 579,643.76 -579,643.76 608,625.95 201,781.44 233,677.50 178,185.00 (5,017.99) 02/01/2023 440,000.00 3.000%147,043.76 587,043.76 -587,043.76 616,395.95 201,781.45 238,822.50 179,340.00 (3,548.00) 02/01/2024 455,000.00 3.000%133,843.76 588,843.76 -588,843.76 618,285.95 201,781.45 238,402.50 180,337.50 (2,235.50) 02/01/2025 460,000.00 4.000%120,193.76 580,193.76 -580,193.76 609,203.45 201,781.45 237,825.00 175,927.50 (6,330.50) 02/01/2026 480,000.00 4.000%101,793.76 581,793.76 -581,793.76 610,883.45 201,781.44 235,095.00 180,547.50 (6,540.49) 02/01/2027 505,000.00 4.000%82,593.76 587,593.76 -587,593.76 616,973.45 201,781.45 237,405.00 179,497.50 (1,710.50) 02/01/2028 520,000.00 3.000%62,393.76 582,393.76 -582,393.76 611,513.45 201,781.45 234,045.00 178,237.50 (2,550.50) 02/01/2029 540,000.00 3.000%46,793.76 586,793.76 -586,793.76 616,133.45 201,781.45 237,930.00 178,447.50 (2,025.50) 02/01/2030 155,000.00 3.000%30,593.76 185,593.76 -185,593.76 194,873.45 201,781.44 --(6,907.99) 02/01/2031 160,000.00 3.000%25,943.76 185,943.76 -185,943.76 195,240.95 201,781.44 --(6,540.49) 02/01/2032 165,000.00 3.000%21,143.76 186,143.76 -186,143.76 195,450.95 201,781.45 --(6,330.50) 02/01/2033 170,000.00 3.000%16,193.76 186,193.76 -186,193.76 195,503.45 201,781.45 --(6,278.00) 02/01/2034 175,000.00 3.125%11,093.76 186,093.76 -186,093.76 195,398.45 201,781.44 --(6,382.99) 02/01/2035 180,000.00 3.125%5,625.00 185,625.00 -185,625.00 194,906.25 201,781.44 --(6,875.19)0 Total $5,515,000.00 -$1,424,235.74 $6,939,235.74 (112,956.43)$6,826,279.31 $7,167,593.28 $3,026,721.68 $2,399,128.08 $1,817,663.17 (75,919.66) Significant Dates Dated 6/27/2018 First Coupon Date 2/01/2019 Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $43,563.36 Average Life 7.899 Years Average Coupon 3.2693431% Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.7720449% True Interest Cost (TIC)2.7053309% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.5755674% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)2.8937033% Series 2018A GO Bonds - F | Issue Summary | 6/ 5/2018 | 11:41 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $1,880,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Water Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 06/27/2018 ----- 02/01/2019 --37,033.89 37,033.89 37,033.89 08/01/2019 --31,150.00 31,150.00 - 02/01/2020 160,000.00 3.000%31,150.00 191,150.00 222,300.00 08/01/2020 --28,750.00 28,750.00 - 02/01/2021 165,000.00 3.000%28,750.00 193,750.00 222,500.00 08/01/2021 --26,275.00 26,275.00 - 02/01/2022 170,000.00 3.000%26,275.00 196,275.00 222,550.00 08/01/2022 --23,725.00 23,725.00 - 02/01/2023 180,000.00 3.000%23,725.00 203,725.00 227,450.00 08/01/2023 --21,025.00 21,025.00 - 02/01/2024 185,000.00 3.000%21,025.00 206,025.00 227,050.00 08/01/2024 --18,250.00 18,250.00 - 02/01/2025 190,000.00 4.000%18,250.00 208,250.00 226,500.00 08/01/2025 --14,450.00 14,450.00 - 02/01/2026 195,000.00 4.000%14,450.00 209,450.00 223,900.00 08/01/2026 --10,550.00 10,550.00 - 02/01/2027 205,000.00 4.000%10,550.00 215,550.00 226,100.00 08/01/2027 --6,450.00 6,450.00 - 02/01/2028 210,000.00 3.000%6,450.00 216,450.00 222,900.00 08/01/2028 --3,300.00 3,300.00 - 02/01/2029 220,000.00 3.000%3,300.00 223,300.00 226,600.00 Total $1,880,000.00 -$404,883.89 $2,284,883.89 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $11,997.56 Average Life 6.382 Years Average Coupon 3.3747199% Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.6144952% True Interest Cost (TIC)2.5332216% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.5755674% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)2.7568164% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 2.3414567% Weighted Average Maturity 6.408 Years Series 2018A GO Bonds - F | Water | 6/ 5/2018 | 11:41 AM City of Edina, Minnesota $1,425,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Storm Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total 06/27/2018 ----- 02/01/2019 --28,057.78 28,057.78 28,057.78 08/01/2019 --23,600.00 23,600.00 - 02/01/2020 125,000.00 3.000%23,600.00 148,600.00 172,200.00 08/01/2020 --21,725.00 21,725.00 - 02/01/2021 125,000.00 3.000%21,725.00 146,725.00 168,450.00 08/01/2021 --19,850.00 19,850.00 - 02/01/2022 130,000.00 3.000%19,850.00 149,850.00 169,700.00 08/01/2022 --17,900.00 17,900.00 - 02/01/2023 135,000.00 3.000%17,900.00 152,900.00 170,800.00 08/01/2023 --15,875.00 15,875.00 - 02/01/2024 140,000.00 3.000%15,875.00 155,875.00 171,750.00 08/01/2024 --13,775.00 13,775.00 - 02/01/2025 140,000.00 4.000%13,775.00 153,775.00 167,550.00 08/01/2025 --10,975.00 10,975.00 - 02/01/2026 150,000.00 4.000%10,975.00 160,975.00 171,950.00 08/01/2026 --7,975.00 7,975.00 - 02/01/2027 155,000.00 4.000%7,975.00 162,975.00 170,950.00 08/01/2027 --4,875.00 4,875.00 - 02/01/2028 160,000.00 3.000%4,875.00 164,875.00 169,750.00 08/01/2028 --2,475.00 2,475.00 - 02/01/2029 165,000.00 3.000%2,475.00 167,475.00 169,950.00 Total $1,425,000.00 -$306,107.78 $1,731,107.78 - Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars $9,072.08 Average Life 6.366 Years Average Coupon 3.3741729% Net Interest Cost (NIC)2.6142244% True Interest Cost (TIC)2.5329830% Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes 2.5755674% All Inclusive Cost (AIC)2.7322579% IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost 2.3409580% Weighted Average Maturity 6.394 Years Series 2018A GO Bonds - F | Storm | 6/ 5/2018 | 11:41 AM CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO $5,515,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2018A Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting held on June 5, 2018 at 7:00 o’clock P.M., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (including): RESOLUTION NO. _________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $5,515,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2018A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this ______ day of June, 2018. Debra Mangen, City Clerk It was reported that six (6) proposals had been received prior to 11:00 A.M., Central Time today for the purchase of the $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A of the City in accordance with the Preliminary Official Statement distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the Bonds. The proposals have been read and tabulated, and the terms of each have been determined to be as follows: Bid for Interest Net Interest Name of Bidder Principal Rates Cost [See Attached] Councilmember ___________________________ then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. ___________ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE, AWARDING SALE, PRESCRIBING THE FORM AND DETAILS AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF $5,515,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2018A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the “City”), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization of Bonds. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2005-70, adopted on August 16, 2005, the City created a revolving fund as contemplated by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.091, Subdivision 7a (the “Act”), designated as the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund, and established certain accounts within such Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund. The City owns and operates a municipal storm sewer utility (the “Storm Water Utility”) and a municipal water utility (the “Water Utility,” which together with the Storm Water Utility is called the “Utilities”). This Council hereby determines that it is in the best interest of the City to issue its $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A (the “Bonds”) for the purpose of (i) financing from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund the cost of the construction of various local street improvement projects designated as Concord A & G, West 62nd Street, Normandale Park D, Chowen Park D, Bredesen Park A, and Country Club C (together, the “Improvements”); and (ii) financing various improvements to the Utilities, including water and storm sewer improvement projects (together, the “Utilities Improvements”). This Council hereby determines to issue and sell the Bonds to defray the expense incurred and estimated to be incurred by the City in making the Improvements and the Utilities Improvements, including every item of cost of the kinds authorized in Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.65. The portion of the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements are referred to as the “Improvement Bonds” and are issued pursuant to the Act and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Chapter 475, and the portion of the Bonds issued to finance the Utilities Improvements are designated as the “Utilities Bonds” and are issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075 and Chapter 475. The allocation of the Bonds for this purpose is set forth in Section 2.01 hereof. 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Ehlers & Associates, Inc., an independent municipal advisor, to assist the City in connection with the sale of the Bonds. The Bonds are being sold pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), without meeting the requirements for public sale under Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 1. Pursuant to the Terms and Conditions of Sale for the Bonds, six (6) proposals for the purchase of the Bonds were received at or before the time specified for receipt of proposals. -2- The proposals have been opened and publicly read and considered, and the purchase price, interest rates and true interest cost under the terms of each bid have been determined. The most favorable proposal received is that of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and associates (the “Purchaser”), to purchase the Bonds at a price of $5,731,639.83, the Bonds to bear interest at the rates set forth in Section 2.01. The proposal is hereby accepted, and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute a contract on the part of the City for the sale of the Bonds with the Purchaser. The good faith checks of the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned forthwith. 1.04. Performance of Requirements. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, to issue and sell the Utilities Bonds to pay the costs of the Utilities Improvements, and to pledge to the payment of the Utilities Bonds net revenues to be derived from charges for the service, use and availability of the Utilities. The City presently has certain outstanding obligations which constitute a lien on the net revenues of the Utilities. Such obligations permit further pledges and appropriations of net revenues of the Utilities to be made superior or subordinate to or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation of net revenues of the Utilities to pay such obligations. The City Council hereby determines that the estimated net revenues of the Utilities will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to or projected to be used, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Utilities Bonds and such outstanding obligations which constitute a lien on the net revenues of the Utilities. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Utilities Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now necessary for this Council to establish the form and terms of the Utilities Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Utilities Bonds forthwith. 1.05. Maturities. This Council finds and determines that the maturities of the Improvement Bonds, as set forth in Section 2.01 hereof, are warranted by the anticipated collection of the assessments to be levied for the cost of the Improvements. Section 2. Bond Terms; Registration; Execution and Delivery. 2.01. Maturities; Interest Rates; Denominations; Payment. The Bonds shall be designated General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A, shall be originally dated as of June 28, 2018, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 each, or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February 1 in the respective years and amounts stated below, and shall bear inter est, computed on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, from June 28, 2018, until paid or duly called for redemption at the respective annual rates set forth opposite such years and amounts, as follows: -3- Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2020 $285,000 3.000% 2027 $505,000 4.000% 2021 405,000 3.000 2028 520,000 3.000 2022 420,000 3.000 2029 540,000 3.000 2023 440,000 3.000 2031 315,000 3.000 2024 455,000 3.000 2033 335,000 3.000 2025 460,000 4.000 2035 355,000 3.125 2026 480,000 4.000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar for the Bonds appointed herein. The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Improvement Bonds: Year Amount Year Amount 2020 0 2027 $145,000 2021 $115,000 2028 150,000 2022 120,000 2029 155,000 2023 125,000 2031 315,000 2024 130,000 2033 335,000 2025 130,000 2035 355,000 2026 135,000 The portion of the Bonds maturing in the following years and amounts constitute the Utilities Bonds: Year Water Utility Storm Utility Total 2020 $160,000 $125,000 $285,000 2021 165,000 125,000 290,000 2022 170,000 130,000 300,000 2023 180,000 135,000 315,000 2024 185,000 140,000 325,000 2025 190,000 140,000 330,000 2026 195,000 150,000 345,000 2027 205,000 155,000 360,000 2028 210,000 160,000 370,000 2029 220,000 165,000 385,000 2031 0 0 0 2033 0 0 0 2035 0 0 0 -4- 2.02. Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall be dated by the Registrar as of the date of its authentication. The interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2019, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 2.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the “Registrar”). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Register. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bonds are surrendered by the registered owner for exchange the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is valid and genuine and that the requested transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for the refusal, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon -5- the owner’s order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes, Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated, Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be destroyed, stolen or lost, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond destroyed, stolen or lost, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was destroyed, stolen or lost, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, destroyed, stolen or lost Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. (i) Authenticating Agent. The Registrar is hereby designated authenticating agent for the Bonds, within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, as amended. (j) Valid Obligations. All Bonds issued upon any transfer or exchange of Bonds shall be the valid obligations of the City, evidencing the same debt, and entitled to the same benefits under this Resolution as the Bonds surrendered upon such transfer or exchange. 2.04. Appointment of Registrar and Paying Agent. The City hereby appoints U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as the initial Registrar. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute and deliver, on behalf of the City, a contract with U.S. Bank National Association, as Registrar. Upon merger or consolidation of the Registrar with another corporation, if the resulting corporation is a bank or trust company authorized by law to conduct such business, such corporation shall be authorized to act as successor Registrar. The City agrees to pay the reasonable and customary charges of the Registrar for the services performed. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days’ notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar. 2.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the year 2028 and later years shall be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds having the same maturity date, on February 1, 202 7, -6- and on any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof and accrued interest to the date of redemption. Bonds maturing on February 1, 2031, 2033, and 2035 are subject to mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to their principal amount plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium, on February 1 in each of the years shown below, in an amount equal to the following principal amounts: Bonds Maturing on February 1, 2031 Sinking Fund Payment Date Aggregate Principal Amount 2030 $155,000 2031 160,000 Bonds Maturing on February 1, 2033 Sinking Fund Payment Date Aggregate Principal Amount 2032 $165,000 2033 170,000 Bonds Maturing on February 1, 2035 Sinking Fund Payment Date Aggregate Principal Amount 2034 $175,000 2035 180,000 Prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond prior to its stated maturity date, the City Finance Director shall cause notice of the call for redemption thereof to be published as required by law and, not more than sixty (60) and not fewer than thirty (30) days prior to the designated redemption date, shall cause notice of the call to be mailed to the registered holders of any Bonds to be redeemed at their addresses as they appear on the bond register described in Section 2.03 hereof, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed -7- shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redem ption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive without charge, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 2.06. Execution, Authentication and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager, provided that all signatures may be printed, engraved or lithographed facsimiles of the originals. In case any officer whose signature or a facsimile of whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature or facsimile shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes, the same as if he or she had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this Resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this Resolution. When the Bonds have been so prepared, executed and authenticated, the City Finance Director shall deliver them to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 2.07. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be typed or printed in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. 2.08. Use of Securities Depository; Book-Entry Only System. The provisions of this Section shall take precedence over the provisions of Sections 2.01 through 2.07 to the extent they are inconsistent therewith. (a) The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) has agreed to act as securities depository for the Bonds, and to provide a Book-Entry Only System for registering the ownership interest of the financial institutions for which it holds the Bonds (the “DTC Participants”), and for distributing to such DTC Participants such amount of the principal and interest payments on the Bonds as they are entitled to receive, for redistribution to the beneficial owners of the Bonds as reflected in their records (the “Beneficial Owners”). (b) Initially, and so long as DTC or another qualified entity continues to act as securities depository, the Bonds shall be issued in typewritten form, one for each maturity in a principal amount equal to the aggregate principal amount of each maturity, shall be registered in the name of the securities depository or its nominee, shall be subject to the provisions of this Section 2.08, and no Beneficial Owner shall have the right to receive a certificate of ownership -8- or printed Bond. While DTC is acting as the securities depository, the Bonds shall be registered in the name of the DTC’s nominee, CEDE & CO; provided that upon delivery by DTC to the City and the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of CEDE & CO., the words “CEDE & CO.” in this Resolution shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. With respect to Bonds registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, the City and the Registrar shall have no responsibility or obligation to any DTC Participant or Beneficial Owner with respect to the following: (i) the accuracy of the records of any securities depository or its nominee with respect to any ownership interest in the Bonds, (ii) the delivery to any DTC Participant or other person or any other person, other than DTC, of any notice with respect to the Bonds, including any notice of redemption, or (iii) the payment to any DTC Participant or any other person, other than DTC, of any amount with respect to the principal of or premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. The Registrar shall pay all principal of and premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds only to or upon the order of DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the City’s obligat ions with respect to the principal and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. So long as the Book-Entry Only System is in effect, no person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond. (c) Upon receipt by the City and the Registrar of written notice from the securities depository to the effect that it is unable or unwilling to discharge its responsibilities under the Book-Entry Only System, the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange Bonds of the initial series as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts, and whenever the securities depository requests the City and the Registrar to do so, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice (i) to arrange for a substitute depository willing and able, upon reasonable and customary terms, to maintain custody of the Bonds, or (ii) to make available Bonds registered in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owner registering ownership transferring or exchanging such Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (d) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interests of the Beneficial Owner that they be able to obtain printed Bonds, the City may so notify the securities depository and the Registrar, whereupon the securities depository shall notify the Beneficial Owners of the availability through the securities depository of such printed Bonds. In such event, the City shall cause to be prepared and the Registrar shall issue, transfer and exchange the printed Bonds fully executed and authenticated, as requested by the securities depository in appropriate amounts and, whenever the securities depository requests, the City and the Registrar shall cooperate with the securities depository in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to make available printed Bonds registered on the Bond Register in whatever name or names the Beneficial Owners entitled to receive Bonds shall designate, in accordance with clause (f) or clause (g) below, whichever is applicable. (e) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Resolution to the contrary, so long as any Bond is registered in the name of a securities depository or its nominee, all payments of -9- principal and interest on the Bond and all notices with respect to the Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to the securities depository. (f) In the event that the Book-Entry Only System established pursuant to this Section is discontinued, except as provided in clause (g), the Bonds shall be issued through the securities depository to the Beneficial Owners. (g) In the event of termination of the Book-Entry Only System, the City shall have the right to terminate, and shall take all steps necessary to terminate, all arrangements with the securities depository described herein, and thereafter shall issue, register ownership of, transfer and exchange all Bonds as provided in Section 2.03. Upon receipt by the securities depository of notice from the City, the securities depository shall take all actions necessary to assist the City and the Registrar in terminating all arrangements for the issuance of documents evidencing ownership interests in the Bonds through the securities depository. Nothing herein shall affect the securities depository’s rights under clause (e) above. Section 3. Use of Proceeds. 3.01. General Obligation Bonds, Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund. The City hereby establishes within the Construction Fund of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund a special subbaccount designated as the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund (the “Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund”) as a separate bookkeeping account on its books and records. There shall be deposited into the Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund, when and as received, proceeds of the Improvement Bonds in the amount of $2,122,257.26. There shall be established a separate account within the Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund to record expenditures for each Improvement. The moneys in the Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund will be disbursed by the City, in accordance with this Resolution and the City’s normal procedures, to pay (or reimburse the City for) the costs of the Improvements, including the issuance costs of the Improvement Bonds pursuant to Section 10 hereof. At such time as the Improvements are completed the City shall transfer any remaining balance in the Series 2018A Improvement Construction Fund as provided in Resolution No. 2005-70. 3.02. General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund. There is hereby established in the official books and records of the City, a separate General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund (the “Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund”). The City hereby appropriates to the Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund proceeds of the Utilities Bonds in the amount of $3,423,551.14. The Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund shall be used solely to defray expenses of the Utilities Improvements, including but not limited to the transfer to the Utilities Bond Fund created in Section 4.02 hereof, of amounts sufficient for the payment of the expenses incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Utilities Bonds. Upon completion and payment of all costs of the Utilities Improvements , any balance of the proceeds of Utilities Bonds remaining in the Series 2018A Utilities Construction Fund may be used to pay the cost, in whole or in part, of any other improvements to the Utilities, as directed by the City Council, but any balance of suc h proceeds not so used shall be credited and paid to the Utilities Bond Fund. -10- Section 4. Bond Funds. 4.01. General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2018A Bond Fund. So long as any of the Improvement Bonds are outstanding and any principal of or interest thereon unpaid, the City shall maintain a separate debt service fund on its official books and records to be known as the General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2018A Bond Fund (the “Improvement Bond Fund”) within the Debt Service Account of the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (the “Debt Service Account”), and the principal of and interest on the Improvement Bonds shall be payable from the Improvement Bond Fund. The City irrevocably appropriates to the Improvement Bond Fund (a) proceeds of the Improvement Bonds in the amount of $112,956.43 representing capitalized interest on the Improvement Bonds; (b) all moneys transferred with respect to the Improvement Bonds from other accounts within the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Debt Service Account; (c) special assessments levied and collected in accordance with Section 5 hereof; and (d) all other moneys as shall be appropriated by the City Council to the Improvement Bond Fund from time to time. On the business day preceding each date on which principal of or interest on the Improvement Bonds are to be paid by the City in accordance with this Resolution, the City Finance Director shall, without further direction by the Council, transfer from the Debt Service Account in the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund to the Improvement Bond Fund an amount sufficient to pay such principal and interest. If the aggregate balance in the Improvement Bond Fund is at any time insufficient to pay all interest and principal then due on all Improvement Bonds payable therefrom, the payment shall be made from any fund of the City which is available for that purpose, subject to reimbursement from the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund when the balance therein is sufficient, and the City Council covenants and agrees that it will each year levy a sufficient amount of ad valorem taxes to take care of any accumulated or anticipated deficiency, which levy is not subject to any constitutional or statutory limitation. 4.02. Utilities Bond Fund. The Utilities Bonds shall be payable from a separate General Obligation Utilities Bonds, Series 2018A Bond Fund (the “Utilities Bond Fund”), which the City agrees to maintain until the Utilities Bonds have been paid in full. If the balance in the Utilities Bond Fund is ever insufficient to pay all principal and interest then due on bonds payable therefrom, the City Finance Director shall nevertheless provide sufficient money from any other funds of the City which are available for that purpose, and such other funds shall be reimbursed from subsequent receipts of net revenues of the Utilities appropriated to the Utilities Bond Fund and, if necessary, from the proceeds of the taxes levied for the Utilities Bond Fund. The Ci ty Finance Director shall deposit in the Utilities Bond Fund (a) proceeds of the Utilities Bonds in the amount of $0 and (b) all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of such bonds and interest, including the net revenues of the Utilities herein pledged and appropriated to the Utilities Bond Fund and all collections of any ad valorem taxes levied for the payment of the Utilities Bonds. Section 5. Levy of Special Assessments; Full Faith and Credit Pledged. 5.01. Levy of Special Assessments. The City hereby covenants and agrees that for payment of the cost of each of the Improvements it will do and perform all acts and things -11- necessary for the full and valid levy of special assessments against all assessable lots, tracts and parcels of land benefited thereby and located within the area proposed to be assessed therefor, based upon the benefits received by each such lot, tract or parcel, in an aggregate principal amount not less than twenty percent (20%) of the cost of the Improvements. In the event that any such assessment shall be at any time held invalid with respect to any lot, piece or parcel of land, due to any error, defect or irregularity in any action or proceeding taken or to be taken by the City or this Council or any of the City’s officers or employees, either in the making of such assessment or in the performance of any condition precedent thereto, the City and this Council hereby covenant and agree that they will forthwith do all such further acts and take all such further proceedings as may be required by law to make such assessments a valid and binding lien upon such property. The Council presently estimates that the special assessments levied for payment of the cost of the Improvements shall be in the principal amount of $2,280,000 payable in not more than 15 installments, the first installment to be collectible with taxes during the year 2020, and that deferred installments shall bear interest at the rate of 3.770% per annum from the date of the resolution levying said assessment until December 31 of the year in which the installment is payable. 5.02. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit of the City are irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and the interest on the Bonds, and the Bonds shall be payable from the Bond Funds in accordance with the provisions and covenants contained in this Resolution. It is estimated that the special assessments levied and to be levied for the payment of the Improvements and net revenues of the Utilities pledged to the payment of the Utilities Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent (5%) in excess of the annual principal and interest requirements of the Improvement Bonds and Utilities Bonds. Section 6. Imposition of Charges; Additional Bonds. The City hereby covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Utilities Bonds that so long as any of the Utilities Bonds are outstanding, the City will impose and collect reasonable charges for the service, use and availability of the Utilities to the City and its inhabitants according to schedules calculated to produce net revenues which, will be sufficient to pay all principal and interest when due on the Utilities Bonds and all other obligations payable from the net revenues of the Utilities. Net revenues of the Utilities, to the extent necessary, are hereby irrevocably pledged and appropriated to the payment of the principal of the Utilities Bonds and interest thereon, provided that nothing herein shall preclude the City from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of net revenues of the Utilities for the payment of additional obligations of the City hereafter authorized if the City Council determines before the authorization of such additional obligations that the estimated net revenues of the Utilities will be sufficient, together with any other sources pledged to or projected to be used, for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Utilities Bonds and paid therefrom and such additional obligations. Such further pledges and appropriations of said net revenues may be made superior or subordinate to or on a parity with the pledge and appropriation herein made, as to the application of net revenues received from time to time. -12- Section 7. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this Resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may neverthele ss be discharged by depositing with the Registrar a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued from the due date to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bonds called for redemption on any date when they are prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date an amount equal to the principal, interest and redemption premium, if any, which are then due, provided that notice of such redemption has been duly given as provided herein. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank or trust company qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing or callable at the holder’s option on such dates as shall be required to pay all principal, interest and redemption premiums to become due thereon to maturity or said redemption date. Section 8. County Auditor Registration, Certification of Proceedings, Investment of Money, Arbitrage and Official Statement. 8.01. County Auditor Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as the County Auditor shall require, and to obtain from said County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on his bond register as required by law. 8.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be requi red to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 8.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the registered owners of the Bonds, that it will not take, or permit to be taken by any of its offi cers, employees or agents, any action which would cause the interest payable on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the “Regulations”) as are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become includable in gross income of the recipient under the Code and the Regulations. The facilities financed by the Bonds shall at all times during the term of the Bonds be owned and maintained by the City and the City shall not enter into any lease, use agreement, management agreement, capacity agreement or other agreement or contract with any -13- nongovernmental person relating to the use of the facilities financed by the Bonds, or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered “private activity bonds” or “private loan bonds” pursuant to Section 141 of the Code. 8.04. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and the City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this Resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser a certification in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and the Regulations, stating the facts, estimates and circumstances in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of the Code and Regulations. 8.05. Arbitrage Rebate. The City shall take such actions as are required to comply with the arbitrage rebate requirements of paragraphs (2) and (3) of Section 148(f) of the Code. 8.06. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Ehlers and Associates, Inc., is hereby approved. Ehlers and Associates, Inc. is hereby authorized on behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2-12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. 8.07. Reimbursement. The City certifies that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used by the City to reimburse itself for any expenditure with respect to the financed facilities which the City paid or will have paid more than 60 days prior to the issuance of the Bon ds unless, with respect to such prior expenditures, the City shall have made a declaration of official intent which complies with the provisions of Section 1.150-2 of the Regulations, provided that a declaration of official intent shall not be required (i) with respect to certain de minimis expenditures, if any, with respect to the financed facilities meeting the requirements of Section 1.150 -2(f)(1) of the Regulations, or (ii) with respect to “preliminary expenditures” for the financed facilities as defined in Section 1.150-2(f)(2) of the Regulations, including engineering or architectural expenses and similar preparatory expenses, which in the aggregate do not exceed 20% of the “issue price” of the Bonds. 8.08. Qualified Tax-Exempt Obligations. The City Council hereby designates the Bonds as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” for purposes of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code relating to the disallowance of interest expense for financial institutions, and hereby finds that the reasonably anticipated amount of tax-exempt governmental obligations (within the meaning of Section 265(b)(3) of the Code) which will be issued by the City and all subordinate entities during calendar year 2018 does not exceed $10,000,000. -14- Section 9. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the Purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2-12 promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2-12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the Rule), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds. The City is the only obligated person in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this section, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this section, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this section constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this section, Owner or Bondowner means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any Beneficial Owner (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, Beneficial Owner means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (ii) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before twelve months after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the Disclosure Information): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with the governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and -15- (B) to the extent not included in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type contained in the Official Statement under headings: “VALUATIONS—Current Property Valuations,” “DEBT—Direct Debt,” and “TAX RATES, LEVIES AND COLLECTIONS—Tax Levies and Collections” and “GENERAL INFORMATION—US Census Data-Population Trend” and “— Employment / Unemployment Data,” which information may be unaudited. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been filed with the SEC or have been made available to the public on the Internet Web site of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB). If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the MSRB. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) hereof), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this section is amended as permitted by this paragraph (b)(1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner not in excess of ten business days after the occurrence of the event, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events (each a Material Fact): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non-payment related defaults, if material; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; -16- (F) Adverse tax opinions, the issuance by the Internal Revenue Service of proposed or final determinations of taxability, Notices of Proposed Issue (IRS Form 5701-TEB) or other material notices or determinations with respect to the tax status of the security, or other material events affecting the tax status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders, if material; (H) Bond calls, if material, and tender offers; (I) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution, or sale of property securing repayment of the securities, if material; (K) Rating changes; (L) Bankruptcy, insolvency, receivership or similar event of the obligated person; (M) The consummation of a merger, consolidation, or acquisition involving an obligated person or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the obligated person, other than in the ordinary course of business, the entr y into a definitive agreement to undertake such an action or the termination of a definitive agreement relating to any such actions, other than pursuant to its terms, if material; and (N) Appointment of a successor or additional trustee or the change of name of a trustee, if material. As used herein, for those events that must be reported if material, an event is “material” if it is an event as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, an event is also “material” if it is an event that would be deemed material for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. For the purposes of the event identified in (L) hereinabove, the event is considered to occur when any of the following occur: the appointment of a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer for an obligated person in a proceeding under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or in any other proceeding under state or federal law in which a court or governmental authority has assumed jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person, or if suc h jurisdiction has been assumed by leaving the existing governing body and officials or officers in possession but subject to the supervision and orders of a court or governmental authority, or the entry of an order confirming a plan of reorganization, arrangement or liquidation by a court or governmental authority having supervision or jurisdiction over substantially all of the assets or business of the obligated person. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: -17- (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (b)(1) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this section pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under subsection (d)(2); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this section pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in the accounting principles pursuant to which the financi al statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. (1) The City agrees to make available to the MSRB, in an electronic format as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time, the information described in subsection (b). (2) All documents provided to the MSRB pursuant to this subsection (c) shall be accompanied by identifying information as prescribed by the MSRB from time to time. (d) Term; Amendments; Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this section shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this section shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final judicial or administrative actions or proceedings, the failure of the City to comply wit h the requirements of this section will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This section (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (c)(3) hereof) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of -18- operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this section as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This section is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 10. Authorization of Payment of Certain Costs of Issuance of the Bonds . The City authorizes the Purchaser to forward the amount of Bond proceeds allocable to the payment of issuance expenses to Klein Bank, on the closing date for further distribution as directed by the City’s financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. -19- Adopted this 5th day of June, 2018. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember ______________________ and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. PROJECTED LEVIES A-1 EXHIBIT A BOND FORM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND, SERIES 2018A R- $________ Interest Rate Maturity Date Date of Original Issue CUSIP ____% February 1, 20__ June 27, 2018 REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: THOUSAND DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the City), acknowledges itself to be indebted and for value received hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the principal sum specified above on the maturity date specified above, and to pay interest thereon from the date of original issue specified above, or the most recent interest payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for, at the annual rate specified above, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 2019 (each such date, an Interest Payment Date), to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month immediately preceding the payment date, all subject to the provisions referred to herein with respect to redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest so payable on any Interest Payment Date shall be paid to the person in whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the fifteenth day (whether or not a business day) of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date. Interest hereon shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof, the principal hereof are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft by U.S. Bank National Association in St. Paul, Minnesota, as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar), or its designated successor under the resolution described herein. For the prompt and full payment of such principal and interest as the same respectively become due, the full faith and credit and taxing powers of the City have been and are hereby irrevocably pledged. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of $5,515,000, all of like date and tenor, except as to serial number, maturity date, interest rate, redemption privilege and denomination issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on June 5, 2018 (the “Resolution”), to maintain the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund of the City, a permanent fund established for the financing of local improvements for which special assessments may be levied against property A-2 specifically benefited thereby, and to finance the costs of improvements to the storm sewer utility and to the water utility of the City and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and Section 444.075 and Chapter 475. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. The Bonds of this series are issuable only as fully registered Bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds of this issue maturing in 2028 and earlier years are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in 2027 and later years are each subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part in such order as the City shall determine and by lot as to Bonds maturing on the same date, on February 1, 2027 and any date thereafter (whether or not an interest payment date), at a price equal to the principal amount thereof plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 2031, 2033, and 2035 shall be subject to mandatory redemption prior to maturity by lot pursuant to the mandatory sinking fund requirements of the Resolution on February 1 in the years and in the principal amounts set forth in the Resolution at a redemption price equal to the stated principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, without premium. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of the Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bond or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon the partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Registrar , by the registered owner hereof in person or by the owner’s attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or the owner’s attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transfer or exchange the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. The Bonds have been designated as “qualified tax-exempt obligations” pursuant to Section 265(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The City and the Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name this Bond is registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. A-3 Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Bond, so long as this Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Depository Trust Company, or in the name of any other nominee of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on this Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to this Bond, only to Cede & Co. or other nominee in accordance with the operational arrangements of The Depository Trust Company or other securities depository as agreed to by the City. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed preliminary to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City in accordance with its terms, have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has levied or agreed to levy special assessments on property specially benefited by the improve ments financed by the Bonds collectible in the years and amounts required to produce sums not less than five percent in excess of the principal of and interest on such portion of the Bonds as such principal and interest respectively become due, and has appropriated such special assessments to the Revenue Account (the Revenue Account) of its Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund previously established by the City; and that, on or before each date the City is obligated to pay principal of or interest on such portion of the Bonds, the City will transfer from its Revenue Account to a separate General Obligation Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2018A Bond Fund an amount sufficient for the payment of such principal and interest on such date; and the City has pledged to the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds net revenues of the storm water utility and water utility of the City; that in and by the Resolution, the City has covenanted and agreed with the owner of the Bonds that it will impose and collect charges for the service, use and availability of its storm water utility and water utility at the time and in the amounts required to produce net revenues adequate to pay all principal of and interest on the Bonds and on all other bonds payable from net revenues of the storm water utility and water utility as such principal and interest respectively become due; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any constitutional or statutory limitation. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Resolution described herein until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Registrar by manual signature of one of its authorized representatives. A-4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed on its behalf by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager, and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the Date of Original Issue set forth above. CITY OF EDINA City Manager Mayor ________________ CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned within. Date of Authentication: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Registrar By Authorized Representative ________________ A-5 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM --as tenants in common UTMA ………….…. as Custodian for ………….….. (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT --as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act ...................…….. (State) JT TEN --as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. ________________ ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto ________________________________________________________________________ the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints ____________________________________________________________________ attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: NOTICE: The assignor's signature to this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever. Signature Guaranteed: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an “eligible guarantor institution” meeting the requirements of the Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in STAMP or such other “signature guaranty program” as may be determined by the Registrar in addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Please insert social security or other identifying number of assignee:______________________ 4827-2352-0613\4 COUNTY AUDITOR’S CERTIFICATE AS TO REGISTRATION The undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby certifies that there has been filed in my office a certified copy of a resolution duly adopted on June 5, 2018, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, setting forth the form and details of an issue of $5,515,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2018A, dated as of June 28, 2018. I further certify that said Bonds have been entered on my bond register as required by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 475.61 to 475.63. WITNESS my hand and official seal this ______ day of __________, 2018. County Auditor (SEAL) The CITY of EDINA The CITY of EDINA City of Edina $5,515,000 G.O. Bonds Series 2018A Rating Agency Report Summaries The CITY of EDINARatings History •Moody’s Investor Services AAA since 2000 •S&P Global Ratings AAA since 2003 www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINAMoody’s Investors Service •Credit Strengths Economy and Tax Base Financial Operations and Reserves Liquidity •Credit Challenges Debt Pensions www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINAS&P Global Ratings •Credit Strengths Very Strong Economy Very Strong Management Very Strong Budgetary Flexibility and Liquidity Strong Budgetary Performance •Credit Challenges Adequate Debt and Contingent Liability Position www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINABond Summary Number of Bids: 6 Low Bidder: Baird, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Comparison from Lowest to Highest Bid: (TIC as bid) Low Bid High Bid Interest Difference 2.7006% 2.8845% $84,420 Summary of Results: Presale Estimates: Results of Sale Principal Amount*: $5,780,000 $5,515,000 Reoffering Premium: $0 $262,305 Prepaid Assessments: $909,348 $909,348 Underwriter’s Discount: ($46,240) ($45,666) Capitalized Interest: ($105,715) ($112,956) Costs of Issuance: ($80,000) ($72,875) Net Proceeds for Projects: $6,457,393 $6,455,156 True Interest Cost*: 2.9796% 2.7053% Yield: 2.00 – 3.45% 1.75% - 3.15% Total Net P&I: $6,974,582 $6,826,279 www.EdinaMN.gov 5 Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.B. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:C had A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:O rdinanc e No. 2018-10: Amend C ity C ode C onc erning Limited P arking Zones Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt Ordinance 2018-10 including waiver of second reading to Amend Chapter 26 of the Edina City Code concerning L imited P arking Z ones I N TR O D U C TI O N: C ouncil requested changes to C ity C ode to allow staff the ability to make temporary changes to limited parking zones including public parking ramps. T he current language requires a resolution be adopted by C ity C ouncil. T he ordinance was drafted by City Attorney K nutson. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Ordinance No. 2018-10 197641v1 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING LIMITED PARKING ZONES THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. The definition of “time limits” in Section 24-395 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Time limits mean hourly parking restrictions, as specified by the City Manager or the Manager’s designee for all or certain portions of any one or more of the municipal parking facilities. SECTION 2. Section 26-41(a) of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 26-41 – Limited parking zones. (a) Generally. Except on Sundays and legal holidays, no person shall park any vehicle for a longer period than is designated on the signs marking the zone in any limited parking zone designated by the City Manager or the City Manager’s designee. SECTION 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: ______________________________ ______________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 197641v1 Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of ___________________, 2018 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of ____________, 2018. ________________________________ City Clerk Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I.C . To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: R eport / R ecommendation F rom:C ary Teague, C ommunity Development Director Item Activity: Subject:O rdinanc e No. 2018-09, R esolutions Nos. 2018-47 & 2018-48; C omprehens ive P lan Amendment & P reliminary R ezoning with P reliminary Development P lan for F rance Equities LLC , 7250 F ranc e Avenue Ac tion C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: Adopt Ordinance No. 2018-09 creating the P U D D istrict 15 (first reading). Approve R esolution No. 2018-47 C omprehensive P lan Amendment (for the 7250 Site only). Approve R esolution No. 2018-48 P reliminary Rezoning and P reliminary Development P lan. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T his item was continued from the May 15, 2018 City Council meeting. T he public hearing has been closed. S taff prepared three alternatives for the City Council to consider: 1) Denial of the Comprehensive P lan Amendment, P reliminary R ezoning & P reliminary D evelopment P lan. 2) Approval of the C omprehensive P lan Amendment for just the 7250 F rance Avenue site; P reliminary R ezoning & P reliminary Development P lan. 3) Approval of the C omprehensive P lan, P reliminary R ezoning & P reliminary D evelopment P lan as originally recommended by staff and the P lanning Commission. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Resolution No. 2018-47 (Denial of the Comp. Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan) Resolution No. 2018-47 (Approval of the Comp. Plan Amendment for just the 7250 France s ite) Resolution No. 2018-47 (Approval - Staff & Planning Commission recommendation on the Comp Plan Amendment) Resolution No. 2018-48 (Approval of the Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan Ordinance No. 2018-09 Planning Commission Staff Report Proposed Plans Applicant Narrative Site Location & AFO Review & Engineering Review Traffic & Parking Study Verizon Wireles s - Temporary Cell Pole/Antenna 7250 France Pres entation RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 RESOLUTION DENYING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING DENSITY IN THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT TO PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 15, INCLUDING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7250 LLC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68 acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. As proposed, the development would include the following: A 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135 unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. Twenty percent (20%) of the unit area would be for affordable housing, which exceeds the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Retail & Office space totaling 19,000 square feet. Thirty-five (35) surface parking spaces for the retail use. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 44 Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance are requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. A Rezoning from Pod, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development 1.04 On April 25, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.05 On May 15, 2018, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. The Council tabled the decision on the proposal to June 5, 2018. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 Page 2 Section 2. DENIAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning from POD-1, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for the 7250 France Avenue subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is not appropriate at this time as the City is currently considering the density in the transition area west of France as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan update. 2. The proposed rezoning is not consistent with the 2008 City of Edina Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed development does not provide an adequate transition to the west. 4. The density proposed is too high for this area. 5. This area will be studied closer as part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 5, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING DENSITY IN THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68 acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. 1.02 The proposal is to build a 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135-unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 1.04 On April 25, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.05 On May 15, the City Council held a public hearing and continued the decision on the proposal to June 5, 2018. Section 2. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment as written below, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: Table 4.3. Future Land Use Categories is amended as follows: OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The property at 7250 France Avenue or legally described as Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts First Addition, Hennepin County Minnesota, may have a density up to 80 units per acre through a PUD rezoning. Twenty percent (20%) of the dwelling units on the site shall be dedicated for affordable housing at 60% or less of area median gross income, for a minimum of 15 years from the date of certificate of occupancy. Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code: maximum of 0.5 to 1.0 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 Page 2 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50- 80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Aria Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 5. The traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 Page 3 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 5, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING DENSITY IN THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68 acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. 1.02 The proposal is to build a 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135-unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. 1.04 On April 25, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.05 On May 15, 2018, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. Section 2. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 Page 2 Table 4.3. Future Land Use Categories is amended as follows: Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50- 80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Aria Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 5. The traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The City Council may approve a project for up to 80 units per acre through a PUD rezoning. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, underground parking, provision of affordable housing, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code: maximum of 0.5 to 1.0 Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-47 Page 3 ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 5, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT TO PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 15, INCLUDING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7250 LLC BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68 acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. As proposed the development would include the following: A 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135 unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. Twenty percent (20%) of the unit area would be for affordable housing, which exceeds the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Retail & Office space totaling 19,000 square feet. Thirty-five (35) surface parking spaces for the retail use. 1.02 The property is legally described as follows: Lot 44 Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following is required: A Rezoning from Pod, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development 1.04 On April 25, 2018, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requests. Vote: 8 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.05 On May 15, the City Council had a public hearing and considered the requests. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass, designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 Page 2 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Public art; and Significant affordable housing within the project. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 Page 3 6. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 90 feet in the seven-story portion of the building; therefore a 360-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 520 feet, therefore would be code compliant. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenk conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 8. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 9. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from POD-1, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for the 7250 France Avenue Development. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 28, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 Page 4 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Of the proposed housing units, 20% must be dedicated for affordable housing and meet the conditions of the City’s affordable housing policy. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 18, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Wenck Associates Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. 13. Dedication of public access easements along the west and north lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the property to the north, 7200 France Avenue. 14. A temporary cell pole would be constructed at 7200 France in the location proposed to house the existing cellular antennas on the 7250 Building. This pole must be removed upon the reinstallation of the antennas back on the new building at 7250 France. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-48 Page 5 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on May 15, 2018. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION JUNE 5, 2018 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-15 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-15 (PUD-15) (a) Legal description: Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition, Hennepin County. (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on _________, 2018 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2018-___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD-2 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Required Building Setbacks Front – France Side – Gallagher Side – North Rear – West 30-40 feet 30-55 feet 35-40 feet 20 feet Building Height 7 stories and 90 feet Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 2.5% Parking Stalls 320 stall Parking Stall Size 8.5 x 18’ Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 2 (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD Zoning District. (h) Twenty percent (20%) of the dwelling units in the building shall be dedicated for affordable housing at 60% or less of area median gross income, for a minimum of 15 years from the date of certificate of occupancy. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: June 5, 2018 Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk April 25, 2018 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, & Preliminary Development Plan for 7250 France Avenue. Information / Background: The applicant, France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68 acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. As proposed the development would include the following: A 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135 unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. Twenty percent (20%) of the unit area would be for affordable housing, which exceeds the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Retail & Office space totaling 19,000 square feet. Thirty-five (35) surface parking spaces for the retail use. Sustainability. LEED or Green Globe designation would be pursued. Pedestrian and vehicular access is proposed to the lot to the north (7200 France). Amenity terrace including a pool. Primary vehicle access points would be off France Avenue and Gallagher Drive. This access road would also serve the 7200 France site to the north to reduce traffic on 72nd, as has been recommended in previous development proposals for that site. The applicant has gone through the sketch plan process, and the Greater Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson of AFO, Architecture Field Office has provided a STAFF REPORT Page 2 review as well. The applicant has responded to the development principles, AFO’s comments, and feedback received from the sketch plan, and has revised the plans as follows: Increased the Setback on France Avenue to 50 Feet at the base, retaining podium set back of approximately 10 more feet at floors 2-6 on the majority of the façade. Increased setback at rear property (west side) to bring access street out from under the building. Incorporated a walkway on the west side adjacent to the building and maintained the landscape buffer to the west. Build steps down along the west side to 5 stories with a setback at the 6th floor. Overall project size is approximately 8% smaller than the previous iteration. From 2.36 FAR to 2.18. North and west facades have greater development and improved pedestrian realm experience. Increased green roof area at 2nd floor plaza roof. AFO has reviewed the revised plans (See attached memo) and offered the following: The building is now a “four-sided” building, whereby all four facades are treated as primary. The building’s relationship to the woonerf on the west side of the site is vastly improved, in that the drive is no longer underneath the building. The pedestrian pattern seems appropriate and thought out. The woonerfs on the west and north are pedestrian friendly, suggesting use by pedestrians first, bikes second, cars third and service vehicles fourth. The public realm design, including the variety in paving and landscaping depicted in the renderings reinforces the pedestrian experience. The scale and treatment of the public realm/pedestrian experience along France and Gallagher is open and flexible. The building’s northwest corner is better scaled in relation to the adjacent three story buildings. To accommodate the request the following is required: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and A Rezoning from POD-1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone, meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has complete discretion when reviewing this application. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided OR, Office Residential. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Easterly: Macy’s Home Store; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Southerly: Office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided OR, Office Residential. Westerly: Apartments; zoned PRD, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 1.68 acres in size, contains an existing 4-story office building and parking ramp. The parking ramp is in an extremely poor condition. Planning Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential. Zoning: POD, Planned Office District Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1311, 1.25 fully enclosed spaces and .75 surface spaces are required per dwelling unit. (2 spaces per unit.) Therefore, the 135 unit apartment would require 270 parking spaces. The19,000 square feet of retail/office would require 76 spaces (4 spaces per 1,000 s.f.). Therefore, 346 spaces are required between the two uses. The project would provide 320 parking stalls, 285 of which would be underground, and 35 on level one. Wenck Associates conducted a parking study and determined that the proposed parking spaces would be adequate for the development. (See attached study.) The study assumed a 4,000 square foot restaurant within the retail space. Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Primary access to the proposed development would be off Gallagher Drive. A right in and right out is proposed off France Avenue. This access would have to be approved by Hennepin County, as France Avenue is a County Road. The County has provided a preliminary review and found they would not grant the access. The spacing between adjacent intersections/driveways would not be adequate. Future access is proposed to the 7200 France property to the north; this would reduce traffic on 72nd Street, which was required as part of a previous development proposal for the 7200 France site. This access road would also serve the 7200 France site to the north to reduce traffic on 72nd, as has been recommended in previous development proposals for that site. To ensure that this access is available to the property to the north, staff would recommend that an access easement be provided over these drive aisles along the west and north lot lines. Wenck Consulting also conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project. The level of service at adjacent intersections would not be impacted, even if the County does not allow the right-in and right out on France. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 27 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans show that 55 trees would be planted. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are also proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. A site improvement plan agreement would be required to outline public vs. private responsibilities and ownership for private improvement on public property. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination of stucco, architectural metal panels, stone, and glass, with metal panel accents. The applicant will have a materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading area and trash enclosures would be on the inside of the building/parking ramp. Shadow Study As requested at sketch plan, the applicant completed a shadow study to determine impacts the height of the buildings might have. As demonstrated, the biggest impact would be in the winter months. Building Height The building height requirement for this site is 4 stories and 48 feet. (See attached building height overlay district map.) The applicant is requesting flexibility from this standard through the PUD rezoning. Additionally, the City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 90 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 360- STAFF REPORT Page 5 foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 520 feet, therefore would be code compliant. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The proposal to add 135 units of housing on France Avenue with extensive pedestrian walkway opportunities around the entire perimeter of the site would enhance the pedestrian experience in the area. The plans are consistent with the vision document for the Greater Southdale Area by providing a 50 foot setback on France and 30 feet on Gallagher Drive. There would be dedicated bike storage and a bike maintenance area on the first level of the project. STAFF REPORT Page 6 COMPLIANCE TABLE While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the underlying zoning: *Not code compliant Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment – Density To accommodate the request, the following Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre. The Office Residential area is located west of France Avenue and into the Pentagon Park Area. The OR, Office Residential Area allows up to 30 units per acre. This density is low given the density that has been considered as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study. Densities that have been contemplated to date have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. The thinking behind that density has been to allow greater densities in between France and York (100- 125 units per acre; the CAC, Community Activity Center allows up to 105 units per acre in the existing Comprehensive Plan); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per City Standard (POD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – France Front – Gallagher Side – North Rear – West 90 feet (based on height) 80 feet (based on height) 80 feet (based on height) 80 feet based on height Four times the height from R-1 for 7 story building = 320 (based on 80 feet) 30-40 feet* (50 feet to curb) 30 & 55 feet* 35-40 feet* 20 feet* 400 feet Building Height Four stories and 48 feet 7 stories and 90 feet* Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .50% 2.2%* Parking Stalls 270 enclosed (residential) 76 surface spaces Council may require surface stalls if deemed necessary. 320 enclosed total 35 surface* Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ STAFF REPORT Page 7 acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. Below is table of existing high density developments in the City. Note that the trend in multi- family development is higher density. This is due to the high cost of land in Edina, the City’s requirement for affordable housing, and the added cost of redeveloping a site with existing buildings. High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 Walker Elder Suites 7400 York 72 40 7500 York Cooperative 7500 York 416 36 Edinborough Condos 76xx York 392 36 South Haven 3400 Parklawn 100 42 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 6500 France – Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar - Onyx 6725 York 240 52 7250 France Project 7250 France 135 80 5000 France 5000 France 23 29 Hazelton Road Apartments 3650 Hazelton Road 186 150 Bus Garage – Trammel Crow Eden Avenue 165 100 The Collaborative Market Street 131 46 Gateway Point 66th & York 191 96 The Millennium 66th & York 372 60 Lincoln Residences 5901 Lincoln Drive 250 30 Red – Indicates recent projects STAFF REPORT Page 8 Example Residential Density Ranges in Surrounding City’s Comprehensive Plans City Range – Per Acre Bloomington Medium Density Residential 5-10 High Density Residential No limit General Business 0-83 Commercial (Community & Regional) 0-83 High Intense mix use 0-60 Airport South mix use 30-131 Richfield Medium Density Residential 7-12 High Density Residential Minimum of 24 High Density Res./Office Minimum of 24 Mixed Use 50+ St. Louis Park Medium Density Residential 6-30 High Density Residential 20-75 (PUD for high end) Mixed Use 20-75 (PUD for high end) Commercial 20-50 Minnetonka Medium Density Residential 4-12 High Density Residential 12+ Mixed Use No range established (density based on site location and site conditions.) Minneapolis Medium Density (mixed use) 20-50 High Density (mixed use) 50-120 Very High Density(mixed use) 120+ The site’s location on an arterial roadway provides a good location for higher density. The Comprehensive Plan currently suggests allowing higher density subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. The proposed project would contain most of these elements. There is adequate utility capacity available. A traffic study was done by Wenck Associates and concludes that there would be minimal impact to the roads, and the existing roads could support the development. (See attached study.) Additionally, WSB did a traffic study of the entire Southdale area and contemplated densities higher than proposed. (See attached study.) STAFF REPORT Page 9 Underground parking would be included; the at-grade parking lot would be behind the retail/office uses on the street; open space/public area is provided along the street fronts and the pedestrian and vehicle access along the north and west lot lines. Affordable housing is proposed to exceed the City of Edina policy by providing 20% of the units as affordable. The trade-off in allowing more height and density includes: A more creative site plan with improved site circulation and public space; Collaborative design with parcel to the north (7200 France). The plans allow access for the 7200 parcel to take traffic to be away from 72nd and the low density residential area to the north and west; Underground and hidden parking; Improved pedestrian and vehicle access and connections; Significant affordable housing provided within the development; Pedestrian and bicycle oriented design would include bike and pedestrian paths through the site to connect to the north and along France and Gallagher. The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan would be accomplished as follows: OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The City Council may approve a project for up to 80 units per acre through a PUD rezoning. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, underground parking, provision of affordable housing, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Floor to Area Ratio-Per current Zoning Code: maximum of 0.5 to 1.0 Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. STAFF REPORT Page 10 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most all of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Office Residential” which allows for retail, office and housing. The proposal is a high quality residential development that would enhance the surrounding area and add pedestrian activity to the STAFF REPORT Page 11 area with housing on France Avenue. The proposed buildings would be a high quality architectural metal, stone and glass. The proposal would exceed the City’s affordable housing policy to help provide additional affordable housing within the City. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed uses are all consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as OR, Office Residential, which encourages a mixture of uses. Uses include: Offices, attached or multifamily housing. Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; This project would be a true mixed use development with residential, retail and office uses. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned, the proposal includes vertical mixed uses. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and As mentioned, the uses allowed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The densities contemplated are consist with discussions by the Greater Southdale Area Visioning. Additionally, the Wenck Traffic study concludes that the surrounding roadways could support the use. STAFF REPORT Page 12 iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The table on page 6 shows how the proposed new buildings would comply with the POD Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in the new PUD-15 District. Flexibility is requested in regard to building height, setbacks, FAR and parking standard. In relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The area would be vastly improved from existing conditions on the site. The blighted parking ramp would be removed. The provision of housing on France Avenue would increase pedestrian activity on France Avenue. The use will bring more vibrancy to the area with a true mixed use project. The applicant is providing a significant contribution to affordable housing, by providing twenty percent of the units within the project for affordable housing, double the City’s policy. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed amendment is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I- 494. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. STAFF REPORT Page 13 5. Traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. • Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site? Yes. Staff believes the PUD is justified for the following reasons: 1. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Public art; and Affordable housing within the project. (20%) 2. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. STAFF REPORT Page 14 f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. (See pages 10-12 of this report.) In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Creates a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 4. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 90 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 360-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 520 feet, therefore would be code compliant. 5. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Associates conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. STAFF REPORT Page 15 Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District in the Greater Southdale Area from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I- 494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 5. The traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for 7250 France Avenue. Approval is subject to the following findings: STAFF REPORT Page 16 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass, designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Public art; and Significant affordable housing within the project. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. v. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. STAFF REPORT Page 17 vi. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. vii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. viii. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 90 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 360-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 520 feet, therefore would be code compliant. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 8. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 9. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 28, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. STAFF REPORT Page 18 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Of the proposed housing units, 20% must be dedicated for affordable housing and meet the conditions of the City’s affordable housing policy. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 18, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Wenck Associates Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. 13. Dedication of public access easements along the west and north lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the property to the north, 7200 France Avenue. Deadline for a city decision: June 19, 2018 WENCK File #3022-09 April 2, 2018 Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic Impact Study for 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN April 2018 i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 7-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-2 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-3 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................................... 4-3 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES............................................ 4-4 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................. 5-5 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................... 5-6 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: April 2, 2018 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 April 2018 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new residential and retail/office development located at 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northwest corner of the France Avenue/Gallagher Drive intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by an office building and parking structure. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue/Hazelton Road • France Avenue/72nd Street • France Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/proposed access • Gallagher Drive/proposed access The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office building and constructing a new residential and retail/office building. The project includes 316 on-site parking spaces. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2019. As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on both Gallagher Drive and France Avenue. The access on Gallagher Drive is a full movement access. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. In order to account for concerns expressed by Hennepin County, the study also includes analysis of an alternative with access provided solely on Gallagher Drive. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 33 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 65 net trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 931 net weekday daily trips. • Traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at the intersections analyzed to accommodate the proposed project. • From a traffic operations perspective, both access options result in minimal impacts to operations on France Avenue. The option with all access on Gallagher Drive results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher access location, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. • France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines April 2018 1-2 and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. From these comments it appears Hennepin County will likely not allow access on France Avenue. • The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on pedestrian and bicycle operations in this area. The number of trips generated by the proposed project has minimal impact on operations at the nearby intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle operations. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. April 2018 2-1 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic Impact Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new residential and retail/office development located at 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located in the northwest corner of the France Avenue/Gallagher Drive intersection. The proposed project location is currently occupied by an office building and parking structure. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue/Hazelton Road • France Avenue/72nd Street • France Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/proposed access • Gallagher Drive/proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office building and constructing a new residential and retail/office building. The project includes 316 on-site parking spaces. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2019. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The proposed land uses and sizes are shown in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Proposed Land Uses and Sizes Land Use Size Unit Apartments 135 DU Sit-down restaurant 4,000 SF General retail 7,000 SF Office 8,000 SF SF = square feet, DU = dwelling units As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on both Gallagher Drive and France Avenue. The access on Gallagher Drive is a full movement access. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. In order to account for these concerns, the study also includes analysis of a n alternative with access provided solely on Gallagher Drive. April 2018 2-2 April 2018 2-3 April 2018 3-1 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site is currently occupied by an office building and parking structure. The site is bounded by France Avenue to the east, Gallagher Drive to the south, office uses to the north, and residential areas to the west. Near the site location, France Avenue is a six-lane divided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. Gallagher Drive is a two-lane roadway. Existing conditions at intersections near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3 and described below. France Avenue/Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach proves one left turn and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. France Avenue/72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound 72nd Street approach. The eastbound approach provides one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and three through lanes. The southbound approach provides two through lanes and one through/right turn lane. Left turns are not allowed from 72nd Street onto France Avenue. France Avenue/Gallagher Drive (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach proves one left turn and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound Gallagher Drive approach. All approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. Turn movement data for the intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in March 2018. April 2018 3-2 April 2018 4-1 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2020. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2018 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses currently on the site. • 2020 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2020 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth in the area. • 2020 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2020 No-Build volumes to determine 2020 Build volumes. In addition, existing trips generated by the uses currently on the site were subtracted from the total volume. Trip Generation Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trips generated by the existing uses were based on the traffic count data. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed Project Apartments 135 DU 13 36 49 36 23 59 734 Office 8,000 SF 8 1 9 1 8 9 78 Restaurant 4,000 SF 22 18 40 24 15 39 449 General Retail 7,000 SF 4 3 7 13 14 27 264 Existing Uses Removed Medical office 55,000 SF (58) (14) (72) (25) (44) (69) (594) Net Trips (11) 44 33 49 16 65 931 DU=dwelling unit, SF=square feet Table 1 shows the net number of trips generated by the proposed development including reductions for existing trips. As shown, the project adds 33 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 65 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 931 net trips daily. April 2018 4-2 Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population con centrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 55 percent to/from the north on France Avenue • 30 percent to/from the south on France Avenue • 10 percent to/from the west on Parklawn Avenue • 5 percent to/from the east on Gallagher Drive Site Access Options As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on both Gallagher Drive and France Avenue. The access on Gallagher Drive is a full movement access. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. In addition to the proposed access configuration, this study also reviewed the impacts of eliminating the access on France Avenue and providing all access on Gallagher Drive. It was assumed that under this scenario the access on Gallagher Drive would be the same configuration as shown on the site plan. Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. April 2018 4-3 April 2018 4-4 April 2018 5-1 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, b ut with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffi c flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. April 2018 5-2 The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Figures 6 and 7 and discussed below. France Avenue/Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/Gallagher Drive (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS E for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. April 2018 5-3 Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive (minor street stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2020 No-Build, and 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Gallagher Drive/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2020 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal imp act on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue Access As shown in the traffic analysis results, all intersections operate at acceptable levels of service both with and without the proposed access on France Avenue. From a traffic operations perspective, both access options result in minimal impacts to operati ons on France Avenue. The option with all access on Gallagher Drive results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher access location, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. As described earlier, Hennepin County staff expressed concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. April 2018 5-4 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided both sides of France Avenue and the north/west side of Gallagher Drive west of France Avenue. On the south/east side of Gallagher Drive west of France Avenue, a paved trail is provided. Striped crosswalks and pedestrian signal heads are provided at all signalized intersections along France Avenue. The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on pedestrian and bicycle operations in this area. The number of trips generated by the proposed project has minimal impact on operations at the nearby intersections, including pedestrian and b icycle operations. The full sidewalk and bicycle facility plan maps are included in the Appendix. April 2018 5-5 April 2018 5-6 April 2018 6-1 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project will include 316 on -site parking spaces. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 4th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site occurs between 6 pm and 9 pm. The peak parking demand during that time period is 177 spaces. The 316 spaces provided can accommodate the expected peak parking demand. April 2018 7-1 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 33 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 65 net trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 931 net weekday daily trips. • Traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at the intersections analyzed to accommodate the proposed project. • From a traffic operations perspective, both access options result in minimal impacts to operations on France Avenue. The option with all access on Gallagher Drive results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher access location, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. • France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. From these comments it appears Hennepin County will likely not allow access on France Avenue. • The proposed project is expected to have minimal impact on pedestrian and bicycle operations in this area. The number of trips generated by the proposed project has minimal impact on operations at the nearby intersections, including pedestrian and bicycle operations. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. April 2018 8-1 8.0 Appendix • Bicycle and Sidewalk Facilities Maps • Level of Service Worksheets ¹» ¹» ¹» ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹» ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ¹º ñ ¹º ñ ñBrae mar Golf Cour se Bredes en Park Rosland Park Pamela Park Lewis Par k Highlands Par k Walnut Ridge Park Todd Par k Gar den Park Heights Park Van Valkenburg Par k Fr ed Richar ds G olf Course Cree k Valle y Park Lake Edina Park Krahl H ill Nor mandale Par k We ber Field Park Arneson A cre s Park Countryside Park Alde n Park Utley Park Yorktown Park Wooddale Park Arden Par k York Par k Cor ne lia Par k Str ac hauer Par k Fox Me adowPark Edinborough Par k Koje tinPark Mc GuirePark Bir chcr estPark Sher woodPark Me lody LakePark Williams Park Chowe nPark St. John'sPark TingdalePark Brow ndalePark GrandviewSquar e Fr ankTupa Par k Courtne y Fields ?ÞA@ ?úA@?vA@ ?úA@ ?ÞA@ ?vA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirr o r L a k e Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Me l o d y L a k e LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Ce n t e n n i a l L a k e Minneh a h a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine Mil e C r e e k Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St PetersLutheran School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance PublicLibrary ConcordSchool CorneliaSchool HighlandSchool EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace School SouthviewMiddleSchool CountrysideSchool Valley ViewMiddle School Creek Valley School NormandaleElementary EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessor CalvinChristianSchool FireStation BL A K E R D SC H A E F E R R D VERN O N A V E FR A N C E A V E S X E R X E S A V E S CA H I L L R D 70T H ST W 66T H ST W Y O R K A V E S INTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44T H S T W 50T H S T W 54T H ST W 58T H ST W GL E A S O N R D 70T H ST W 76T H ST W DEWE Y HILL RD VALLEY V I E W R D VALLEY VIE W RD MINNESOT A D R 78T H ST W / Engineering Dept November 2014Sidewalk Facilities Legend Existing Sidewalk City of Edina2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Future Active Routes To School Sidewalk Future State-Aid Sidewalk Future City Sidewalk Future Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail æ ¹» ¹» æ æ æ æ æ¹»æ æ ¹º¹º ¹º ñ ñ ñ ¹»æ æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ ¹º æ æ ¹º ¹º æ æ æ ñ æ ¹º ñ æ ñ ?úA@ ?ÞA@ ?vA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mi r r o r L a k e Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Me l o d y L a k e LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Ce n t e n n i a l L a k e AldenPark VanValkenburgPark FoxMeadowPark HighlandsPark Todd Park Weber FieldPark KojetinPark BrowndalePark WooddaleParkWilliamsParkUtleyPark FrankTupaPark SherwoodPark ArdenPark YorkPark ChowenPark PamelaPark St JohnsPark StrachauerPark RoslandPark BristolParkCorneliaPark ArnesonAcresPark LakeEdinaParkFred RichardsGolf Course YorktownPark EdinboroughPark GardenPark MelodyLakePark TingdalePark CountrysidePark BredesenPark WalnutRidgePark KrahlHill Creek Valley Park HeightsPark NormandalePark McGuirePark LewisParkBraemar Park and Golf Course(Courtney Fields) Minneh a h a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine Mil e C r e e k Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d Ca n a d i a n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d CityHall St Peters Lutheran Church & School FireStation Public Works &Park Maintenance CalvaryChurchPublicLibrary ConcordSchool EdinaCovenant CorneliaSchool ColonialChurch HighlandSchool CalvaryLutheran EdinaHighSchool Our Lady ofGrace Church& School SouthviewJr High CrossviewLutheran CountrysideSchool St Albans Episcopal Valley ViewJr High Creek Valley School NormandaleLutheran WooddaleChurch St PatricksCatholic New CityCovenantChurch NormandaleElementary St StephensEpiscopal EdinaCommunityCenter GoldenYearsMontessori CalvinChristianSchool GoodSamaritanMethodist EdinaMorningsideChurch ChristPresbyterianChurch ChapelHillsCongregtional Shepard of the HillsLutheran Edina Community Lutheran Church FireStation Bl a k e R d Vernon A v e Fr a n c e A v e S Xe r x e s A v e S Ca h i l l R d 70th St W Interlachen Blvd Maloney Ave 44th St W 50th St W 54th St W 58th St W Gl e a s o n R d 70th St W 76th St W Dewey Hill Rd Valley Vie w R d Valley View Rd Minnesota Dr78th St W Wo o d d a l e A v e Tr a c y A v e Parklawn Ave Co n c o r d A v e Benton Ave G l e a s o n R d Ma l i b u R d Gr e e n F a r m s R d Mc C a u l e y T r l S Mi r r o r L a k e s D r Lin c o l n D r Wa s h i n g t o n A v e Division St Verno n A v e Golf Ter Co d e A v e Wi l r y a n A v e No r m a n d a l e R d We s t S h o r e D r Corn e l i a D r Fr a n c e A v e S Yo r k A v e S 77th St W Oh m s L n Hilary Ln Oling e r B l v d 66th St W An t r i m R d 63rd St W Xe r x e s A v e S 69th St W Bu s h L a k e R d Me t r o B l v d 66th St W 62nd St W Valley Ln Br o o k s i d e A v e ?úA@ ?ÞA@ ?vA@ 74th St W Valley V i e w R d Engineering Dept January 2016 / Bicycle Facilities Bike Routes (signed and/or marked as) Green Shared Bike Lanes Advisory Bike Lanes Bike Lanes Bike Boulevards Signed Bike Routes Bike or Shared Use Paths Shared Lane Markings Approved Primary Route Approved Secondary Route O:\Users\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Comprehensive.mxd 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 78 14 75 7 573 67 129 793 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 78 14 75 7 573 67 129 793 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 17 2 81 15 78 7 597 70 134 826 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 132 13 261 255 216 47 855 99 919 3520 30 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.52 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 545 972 98 1393 1870 1585 1781 4640 538 1781 5222 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 0 81 15 78 7 436 231 134 538 295 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1615 0 0 1393 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1862 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.8 4.9 0.4 13.8 14.0 4.3 6.7 6.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.4 0.8 4.9 0.4 13.8 14.0 4.3 6.7 6.7 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 0 0 261 255 216 47 628 327 919 2294 1255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.06 0.36 0.15 0.70 0.71 0.15 0.23 0.23 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 423 0 0 401 442 375 275 1176 613 919 2294 1255 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 0.0 43.2 41.4 43.2 53.3 48.6 48.7 13.9 6.9 6.9 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.0 1.5 6.3 12.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.2 6.9 7.8 1.7 2.3 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.0 0.0 0.0 43.9 41.5 44.2 54.8 54.9 60.8 14.0 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS D A A D D D D D E B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 33 174 674 967 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 43.8 56.9 8.2 Approach LOS D D E A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.7 26.3 21.0 8.9 80.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 38.0 26.0 17.0 49.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.3 16.0 3.7 2.4 8.7 7.4 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.2 0.1 0.0 6.1 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.9 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 69 2 27 34 8 5 43 617 27 21 849 67 Future Volume (veh/h) 69 2 27 34 8 5 43 617 27 21 849 67 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 70 2 28 35 8 5 44 630 28 21 866 68 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 245 14 202 229 145 91 799 3193 141 115 1222 96 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1401 107 1495 1380 1076 673 1781 5013 222 1781 4829 378 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 70 0 30 35 0 13 44 427 231 21 610 324 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1401 0 1601 1380 0 1749 1781 1702 1830 1781 1702 1802 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 0.0 1.8 2.5 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.4 11.4 1.3 19.2 19.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 0.0 1.8 4.3 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.4 11.4 1.3 19.2 19.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 245 0 216 229 0 236 799 2168 1166 115 861 456 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.14 0.15 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 0 364 356 0 398 799 2168 1166 308 1454 770 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.0 0.0 41.9 43.9 0.0 41.5 26.8 20.3 20.3 51.0 46.4 46.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 4.9 9.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.0 5.2 5.7 0.6 9.3 10.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.6 0.0 42.2 44.2 0.0 41.6 26.9 20.5 20.7 51.7 51.3 55.6 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D C C C D D E Approach Vol, veh/h 100 48 702 955 Approach Delay, s/veh 43.9 43.5 20.9 52.8 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.1 76.1 20.8 55.3 33.8 20.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 48.0 25.0 20.0 47.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 13.4 7.8 4.3 21.3 6.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.5 0.3 0.1 6.6 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.6 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1> 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 44 43 69 52 40 55 89 588 73 111 746 46 Future Volume (veh/h) 44 43 69 52 40 55 89 588 73 111 746 46 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 46 45 72 54 42 57 93 612 76 116 777 48 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 366 88 141 353 103 140 582 859 267 654 1064 330 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.33 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 648 1036 1781 719 976 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 46 0 117 54 0 99 93 612 76 116 777 48 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1684 1781 0 1695 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 0.0 7.1 2.6 0.0 5.8 4.1 12.5 3.4 6.4 16.4 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.2 0.0 7.1 2.6 0.0 5.8 4.1 12.5 3.4 6.4 16.4 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.62 1.00 0.58 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 366 0 230 353 0 243 582 859 267 654 1064 330 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.51 0.15 0.00 0.41 0.16 0.71 0.29 0.18 0.73 0.15 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 458 0 276 432 0 277 582 1485 461 654 1485 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.8 0.0 44.1 32.4 0.0 42.8 26.3 43.2 21.7 33.4 48.2 22.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.7 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.0 2.7 0.1 4.3 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.1 0.0 2.5 1.7 5.6 2.0 2.9 7.9 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 45.8 32.6 0.0 43.9 26.4 48.2 24.3 33.5 52.5 23.4 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 163 153 781 941 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.2 39.9 43.3 48.7 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.4 24.5 18.1 21.0 42.0 28.9 17.3 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.4 14.5 4.6 9.1 6.1 18.4 4.2 7.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.5 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 75 44 647 862 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 75 44 647 862 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 79 46 681 907 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 460 919 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 469 428 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 469 428 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.2 0.9 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)428 - 469 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.108 - 0.168 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.4 - 14.2 - - HCM Lane LOS B - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 28 91 42 10 54 18 Future Vol, veh/h 28 91 42 10 54 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 31 100 46 11 59 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 57 0 - 0 214 52 Stage 1 - - - - 52 - Stage 2 - - - - 162 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1547 - - - 774 1016 Stage 1 - - - - 970 - Stage 2 - - - - 867 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1547 - - - 758 1016 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 758 - Stage 1 - - - - 950 - Stage 2 - - - - 867 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.7 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1547 - - - 809 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 - - - 0.098 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 AM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 84 5 30 62 24 5 1 10 4 1 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 84 5 30 62 24 5 1 10 4 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 88 5 32 65 25 5 1 11 4 1 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 90 0 0 93 0 0 240 251 91 245 241 78 Stage 1 - - - - - - 97 97 - 142 142 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 143 154 - 103 99 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1505 - - 1501 - - 714 652 967 709 660 983 Stage 1 - - - - - - 910 815 - 861 779 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 860 770 - 903 813 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1505 - - 1501 - - 699 636 967 687 644 983 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 699 636 - 687 644 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 908 813 - 859 761 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 838 752 - 890 811 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1.9 9.4 10.1 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)839 1505 - - 1501 - - 715 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.002 - - 0.021 - - 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 585 68 132 809 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 585 68 132 809 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 17 2 83 15 80 7 609 71 138 843 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 132 13 261 255 216 47 870 100 913 3520 29 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.51 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 545 972 98 1393 1870 1585 1781 4643 535 1781 5223 43 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 0 83 15 80 7 445 235 138 549 301 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1614 0 0 1393 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1863 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.1 14.3 4.5 6.9 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.1 14.3 4.5 6.9 6.9 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 0 0 261 255 216 47 638 333 913 2294 1255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.06 0.37 0.15 0.70 0.71 0.15 0.24 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 423 0 0 401 442 375 275 1176 613 913 2294 1255 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 0.0 43.3 41.4 43.2 53.3 48.5 48.6 14.2 7.0 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.1 1.5 6.2 12.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.2 7.0 7.9 1.8 2.3 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 41.5 44.3 54.8 54.7 60.6 14.2 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS D A A D D D D D E B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 33 178 687 988 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 43.9 56.8 8.3 Approach LOS D D E A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.4 26.6 21.0 8.9 80.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 38.0 26.0 17.0 49.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 16.3 3.7 2.4 8.9 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.3 0.1 0.0 6.3 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 29.9 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 70 2 28 35 8 5 44 629 28 21 866 68 Future Volume (veh/h) 70 2 28 35 8 5 44 629 28 21 866 68 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 71 2 29 36 8 5 45 642 29 21 884 69 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 246 14 202 228 145 91 790 3189 143 115 1245 97 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1401 103 1498 1378 1076 673 1781 5009 225 1781 4831 376 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 71 0 31 36 0 13 45 435 236 21 622 331 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1401 0 1601 1378 0 1749 1781 1702 1830 1781 1702 1803 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 0.0 1.9 2.6 0.0 0.7 2.4 11.6 11.7 1.3 19.6 19.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.8 0.0 1.9 4.5 0.0 0.7 2.4 11.6 11.7 1.3 19.6 19.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.21 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 246 0 216 228 0 236 790 2168 1165 115 877 465 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.00 0.14 0.16 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 0 364 355 0 398 790 2168 1165 308 1454 770 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.0 0.0 42.0 43.9 0.0 41.5 27.1 20.4 20.4 51.0 46.3 46.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.6 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 4.8 9.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.8 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.0 5.3 5.8 0.6 9.5 10.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 44.6 0.0 42.3 44.3 0.0 41.6 27.2 20.6 20.8 51.7 51.1 55.3 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D C C C D D E Approach Vol, veh/h 102 49 716 974 Approach Delay, s/veh 43.9 43.5 21.0 52.6 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.1 76.0 20.9 54.8 34.3 20.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 48.0 25.0 20.0 47.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 13.7 7.8 4.4 21.7 6.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.3 0.1 6.7 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.6 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1> 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 600 74 113 761 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 600 74 113 761 47 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 46 73 55 43 58 95 625 77 118 793 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 366 89 141 353 103 140 575 874 271 647 1081 336 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 651 1033 1781 722 973 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 119 55 0 101 95 625 77 118 793 49 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1684 1781 0 1695 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.7 3.4 6.6 16.7 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.7 3.4 6.6 16.7 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 366 0 230 353 0 243 575 874 271 647 1081 336 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.52 0.16 0.00 0.42 0.17 0.72 0.28 0.18 0.73 0.15 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 456 0 276 431 0 277 575 1485 461 647 1485 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.7 0.0 44.1 32.4 0.0 42.9 26.6 43.1 21.4 33.7 48.1 22.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.0 2.6 0.1 4.3 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.2 0.0 2.6 1.8 5.7 2.0 3.0 8.1 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 46.0 32.6 0.0 44.1 26.8 48.0 24.0 33.8 52.4 23.2 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 166 156 797 960 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 40.0 43.2 48.6 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.0 24.8 18.2 21.0 41.5 29.3 17.4 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 14.7 4.6 9.2 6.2 18.7 4.3 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.5 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 77 45 660 879 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 77 45 660 879 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 81 47 695 925 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 469 937 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 463 420 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 463 420 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.4 0.9 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)420 - 463 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.113 - 0.175 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 - 14.4 - - HCM Lane LOS B - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 93 43 10 55 18 Future Vol, veh/h 29 93 43 10 55 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 32 102 47 11 60 20 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 58 0 - 0 219 53 Stage 1 - - - - 53 - Stage 2 - - - - 166 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 769 1014 Stage 1 - - - - 970 - Stage 2 - - - - 863 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 752 1014 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 752 - Stage 1 - - - - 949 - Stage 2 - - - - 863 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1546 - - - 803 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.1 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 10 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 86 5 31 63 24 5 1 10 4 1 1 Future Vol, veh/h 3 86 5 31 63 24 5 1 10 4 1 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 91 5 33 66 25 5 1 11 4 1 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 91 0 0 96 0 0 246 257 94 251 247 79 Stage 1 - - - - - - 100 100 - 145 145 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 146 157 - 106 102 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - 1498 - - 708 647 963 702 655 981 Stage 1 - - - - - - 906 812 - 858 777 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 857 768 - 900 811 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - 1498 - - 693 631 963 680 639 981 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 693 631 - 680 639 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 904 810 - 856 759 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 835 750 - 887 809 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 2 9.4 10.1 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)834 1504 - - 1498 - - 709 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.002 - - 0.022 - - 0.009 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.4 0 - 7.5 0 - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 600 68 132 799 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 600 68 132 799 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 17 2 83 15 80 7 625 71 138 832 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 132 13 261 255 216 47 890 100 907 3520 30 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.51 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 545 972 98 1393 1870 1585 1781 4657 524 1781 5223 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 0 83 15 80 7 455 241 138 542 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1614 0 0 1393 1870 1585 1781 1702 1776 1781 1702 1862 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.4 14.6 4.5 6.8 6.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.4 14.6 4.5 6.8 6.8 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 0 0 261 255 216 47 651 340 907 2294 1255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.06 0.37 0.15 0.70 0.71 0.15 0.24 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 423 0 0 401 442 375 275 1176 614 907 2294 1255 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 0.0 43.3 41.4 43.2 53.3 48.4 48.5 14.4 7.0 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.1 1.5 6.1 11.8 0.1 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.2 7.1 8.1 1.8 2.3 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 41.5 44.3 54.8 54.6 60.4 14.5 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS D A A D D D D D E B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 33 178 703 977 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 43.9 56.6 8.3 Approach LOS D D E A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.0 27.0 21.0 8.9 80.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 38.0 26.0 17.0 49.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 16.6 3.7 2.4 8.8 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.4 0.1 0.0 6.2 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.2 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 86 5 34 35 8 5 43 624 28 29 868 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 86 5 34 35 8 5 43 624 28 29 868 42 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 88 5 35 36 8 5 44 637 29 30 886 43 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 247 27 192 221 146 91 801 3098 140 146 1251 61 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1401 202 1414 1367 1076 673 1781 5007 227 1781 4989 242 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 88 0 40 36 0 13 44 432 234 30 604 325 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1401 0 1616 1367 0 1749 1781 1702 1830 1781 1702 1827 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 0.0 2.4 2.6 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.6 11.7 1.8 19.0 19.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.1 0.0 2.4 5.0 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.6 11.7 1.8 19.0 19.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.13 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 247 0 219 221 0 237 801 2106 1132 146 853 458 V/C Ratio(X) 0.36 0.00 0.18 0.16 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 0 367 346 0 398 801 2106 1132 308 1454 781 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.5 0.0 42.1 44.4 0.0 41.4 26.8 21.3 21.3 50.0 46.5 46.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.9 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.7 4.9 9.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.3 0.0 1.0 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.0 5.3 5.8 0.8 9.3 10.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.4 0.0 42.5 44.7 0.0 41.5 26.8 21.5 21.7 50.7 51.4 55.5 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D C C C D D E Approach Vol, veh/h 128 49 710 959 Approach Delay, s/veh 44.5 43.8 21.9 52.8 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.0 74.1 20.9 55.5 33.6 20.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 48.0 25.0 20.0 47.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.8 13.7 9.1 4.3 21.1 7.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.3 0.1 6.5 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 40.1 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1> 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 594 74 113 770 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 594 74 113 770 47 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 46 73 55 43 58 95 619 77 118 802 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 366 89 141 353 103 140 572 867 269 650 1091 339 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 651 1033 1781 722 973 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 119 55 0 101 95 619 77 118 802 49 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1684 1781 0 1695 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.6 3.4 6.6 16.9 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.6 3.4 6.6 16.9 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 366 0 230 353 0 243 572 867 269 650 1091 339 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.52 0.16 0.00 0.42 0.17 0.71 0.29 0.18 0.74 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 456 0 276 431 0 277 572 1485 461 650 1485 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.7 0.0 44.1 32.4 0.0 42.9 26.8 43.1 21.5 33.6 48.1 22.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.0 2.7 0.1 4.3 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.2 0.0 2.6 1.8 5.6 2.0 3.0 8.2 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 46.0 32.6 0.0 44.1 26.9 48.1 24.2 33.7 52.4 23.0 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 166 156 791 969 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 40.0 43.2 48.6 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.1 24.7 18.2 21.0 41.3 29.5 17.4 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 14.6 4.6 9.2 6.2 18.9 4.3 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.6 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 49 675 869 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 49 675 869 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 78 52 711 915 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 464 927 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 466 424 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 466 424 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.3 1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)424 - 466 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.122 - 0.167 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 - 14.3 - - HCM Lane LOS B - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 93 43 10 55 21 Future Vol, veh/h 26 93 43 10 55 21 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 102 47 11 60 23 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 58 0 - 0 213 53 Stage 1 - - - - 53 - Stage 2 - - - - 160 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 775 1014 Stage 1 - - - - 970 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 760 1014 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 760 - Stage 1 - - - - 951 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.6 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1546 - - - 817 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.102 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 83 5 31 63 24 5 1 10 35 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 83 5 31 63 24 5 1 10 35 1 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 87 5 33 66 25 5 1 11 37 1 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 91 0 0 92 0 0 243 253 90 247 243 79 Stage 1 - - - - - - 96 96 - 145 145 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 147 157 - 102 98 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - 1503 - - 711 650 968 707 659 981 Stage 1 - - - - - - 911 815 - 858 777 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 856 768 - 904 814 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1504 - - 1503 - - 694 634 968 685 643 981 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 694 634 - 685 643 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 909 813 - 856 759 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 832 750 - 891 812 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 2 9.4 10.4 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)837 1504 - - 1503 - - 705 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.002 - - 0.022 - - 0.06 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.4 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.4 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.2 11: CSAH 17/France Ave & access 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 0 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 17 0 724 924 19 Future Vol, veh/h 0 17 0 724 924 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 18 0 762 973 20 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 497 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 444 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 444 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.4 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)- 444 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.04 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 13.4 - - HCM Lane LOS - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.1 - - 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 600 68 132 799 7 Future Volume (veh/h) 13 16 2 80 14 77 7 600 68 132 799 7 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 14 17 2 83 15 80 7 625 71 138 832 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 121 132 13 261 255 216 47 890 100 907 3520 30 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.01 0.06 0.06 0.51 0.67 0.67 Sat Flow, veh/h 545 972 98 1393 1870 1585 1781 4657 524 1781 5223 44 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 33 0 0 83 15 80 7 455 241 138 542 297 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1614 0 0 1393 1870 1585 1781 1702 1776 1781 1702 1862 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.4 14.6 4.5 6.8 6.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.8 5.1 0.4 14.4 14.6 4.5 6.8 6.8 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.02 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 266 0 0 261 255 216 47 651 340 907 2294 1255 V/C Ratio(X) 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.06 0.37 0.15 0.70 0.71 0.15 0.24 0.24 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 423 0 0 401 442 375 275 1176 614 907 2294 1255 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 41.8 0.0 0.0 43.3 41.4 43.2 53.3 48.4 48.5 14.4 7.0 7.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.1 1.1 1.5 6.1 11.8 0.1 0.2 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.8 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.4 2.0 0.2 7.1 8.1 1.8 2.3 2.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 42.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 41.5 44.3 54.8 54.6 60.4 14.5 7.2 7.4 LnGrp LOS D A A D D D D D E B A A Approach Vol, veh/h 33 178 703 977 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.0 43.9 56.6 8.3 Approach LOS D D E A Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 62.0 27.0 21.0 8.9 80.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 28.0 38.0 26.0 17.0 49.0 26.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.5 16.6 3.7 2.4 8.8 7.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.3 4.4 0.1 0.0 6.2 0.5 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.2 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 94 5 43 35 8 5 43 624 28 21 860 61 Future Volume (veh/h) 94 5 43 35 8 5 43 624 28 21 860 61 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 96 5 44 36 8 5 44 637 29 21 878 62 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 247 22 197 213 146 91 795 3183 144 115 1238 87 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.02 0.08 0.08 Sat Flow, veh/h 1401 164 1446 1356 1076 673 1781 5007 227 1781 4870 343 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 96 0 49 36 0 13 44 432 234 21 613 327 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1401 0 1610 1356 0 1749 1781 1702 1830 1781 1702 1809 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.0 0.0 3.0 2.7 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.5 11.6 1.3 19.3 19.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 0.0 3.0 5.7 0.0 0.7 2.3 11.5 11.6 1.3 19.3 19.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.38 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.19 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 247 0 219 213 0 238 795 2164 1163 115 865 460 V/C Ratio(X) 0.39 0.00 0.22 0.17 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.71 0.71 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 375 0 366 337 0 398 795 2164 1163 308 1454 773 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 44.7 0.0 42.3 44.9 0.0 41.4 27.0 20.4 20.4 51.0 46.4 46.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.8 4.9 9.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.5 0.0 1.2 0.9 0.0 0.3 1.0 5.2 5.7 0.6 9.4 10.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 45.7 0.0 42.9 45.2 0.0 41.5 27.0 20.6 20.8 51.7 51.3 55.5 LnGrp LOS D A D D A D C C C D D E Approach Vol, veh/h 145 49 710 961 Approach Delay, s/veh 44.8 44.2 21.0 52.7 Approach LOS D D C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.1 75.9 21.0 55.1 34.0 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 48.0 25.0 20.0 47.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 3.3 13.6 9.8 4.3 21.4 7.7 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.0 4.6 0.4 0.1 6.6 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 39.8 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1> 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 594 74 113 770 47 Future Volume (veh/h) 45 44 70 53 41 56 91 594 74 113 770 47 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 47 46 73 55 43 58 95 619 77 118 802 49 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 366 89 141 353 103 140 572 867 269 650 1091 339 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.14 0.14 0.32 0.17 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 651 1033 1781 722 973 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 47 0 119 55 0 101 95 619 77 118 802 49 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1684 1781 0 1695 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.6 3.4 6.6 16.9 2.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 2.3 0.0 7.2 2.6 0.0 6.0 4.2 12.6 3.4 6.6 16.9 2.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.61 1.00 0.57 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 366 0 230 353 0 243 572 867 269 650 1091 339 V/C Ratio(X) 0.13 0.00 0.52 0.16 0.00 0.42 0.17 0.71 0.29 0.18 0.74 0.14 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 456 0 276 431 0 277 572 1485 461 650 1485 461 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.97 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 32.7 0.0 44.1 32.4 0.0 42.9 26.8 43.1 21.5 33.6 48.1 22.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.0 1.8 0.2 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.0 2.7 0.1 4.3 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.0 0.0 3.1 1.2 0.0 2.6 1.8 5.6 2.0 3.0 8.2 1.3 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.9 0.0 46.0 32.6 0.0 44.1 26.9 48.1 24.2 33.7 52.4 23.0 LnGrp LOS C A D C A D C D C C D C Approach Vol, veh/h 166 156 791 969 Approach Delay, s/veh 42.3 40.0 43.2 48.6 Approach LOS D D D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.1 24.7 18.2 21.0 41.3 29.5 17.4 21.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 19.0 32.0 17.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 8.6 14.6 4.6 9.2 6.2 18.9 4.3 8.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 4.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 4.6 0.1 0.3 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 45.4 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 49 675 869 11 Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 49 675 869 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 78 52 711 915 12 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 464 927 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 466 424 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 466 424 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.3 1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)424 - 466 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.122 - 0.167 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 14.7 - 14.3 - - HCM Lane LOS B - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 93 43 10 55 21 Future Vol, veh/h 26 93 43 10 55 21 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 102 47 11 60 23 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 58 0 - 0 213 53 Stage 1 - - - - 53 - Stage 2 - - - - 160 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 775 1014 Stage 1 - - - - 970 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1546 - - - 760 1014 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 760 - Stage 1 - - - - 951 - Stage 2 - - - - 869 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.6 0 9.9 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1546 - - - 817 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.102 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.4 0 - - 9.9 HCM Lane LOS A A - - A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 AM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 83 5 31 63 43 5 1 10 52 1 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 83 5 31 63 43 5 1 10 52 1 4 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 3 87 5 33 66 45 5 1 11 55 1 4 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 111 0 0 92 0 0 253 273 90 257 253 89 Stage 1 - - - - - - 96 96 - 155 155 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 157 177 - 102 98 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1479 - - 1503 - - 700 634 968 696 650 969 Stage 1 - - - - - - 911 815 - 847 769 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 845 753 - 904 814 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1479 - - 1503 - - 683 618 968 674 633 969 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 683 618 - 674 633 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 909 813 - 845 751 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 820 735 - 891 812 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1.7 9.4 10.7 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)830 1479 - - 1503 - - 688 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.02 0.002 - - 0.022 - - 0.087 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.4 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0.1 - - 0.3 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 105 21 122 19 1314 152 182 915 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 105 21 122 19 1314 152 182 915 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 24 9 111 22 128 20 1383 160 192 963 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 96 88 27 216 208 176 104 1689 195 697 3658 15 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.39 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 519 795 246 1376 1870 1585 1781 4641 537 1781 5249 22 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 0 111 22 128 20 1014 529 192 625 342 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1561 0 0 1376 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1866 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 5.4 1.4 10.5 1.4 34.4 34.4 9.9 9.2 9.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 9.5 1.4 10.5 1.4 34.4 34.4 9.9 9.2 9.2 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 0 216 208 176 104 1239 646 697 2372 1301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.11 0.73 0.19 0.82 0.82 0.28 0.26 0.26 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 0 0 297 319 270 198 1614 841 697 2372 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.1 0.0 0.0 57.3 54.0 58.0 59.2 31.0 31.0 28.0 7.6 7.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.2 5.6 0.9 6.1 11.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.5 0.7 13.8 15.3 4.3 3.2 3.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 0.0 0.0 59.2 54.2 63.6 60.1 37.1 42.1 28.2 7.9 8.1 LnGrp LOS E A A E D E E D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 57 261 1563 1159 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.8 61.0 39.1 11.3 Approach LOS E E D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.9 55.1 21.0 13.9 100.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 64.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 11.9 36.4 6.1 3.4 11.2 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 12.8 0.2 0.0 7.7 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.7 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 115 6 54 85 10 68 42 1382 92 77 903 88 Future Volume (veh/h) 115 6 54 85 10 68 42 1382 92 77 903 88 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 119 6 56 88 10 70 43 1425 95 79 931 91 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 194 24 219 210 31 214 158 1901 127 582 2965 289 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.33 0.63 0.63 Sat Flow, veh/h 1319 156 1453 1340 202 1414 1781 4890 326 1781 4730 461 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 119 0 62 88 0 80 43 992 528 79 669 353 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1319 0 1609 1340 0 1616 1781 1702 1812 1781 1702 1787 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.0 0.0 4.6 8.4 0.0 6.0 3.2 37.9 37.9 4.2 12.3 12.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 17.9 0.0 4.6 13.0 0.0 6.0 3.2 37.9 37.9 4.2 12.3 12.4 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.26 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 194 0 243 210 0 244 158 1323 704 582 2133 1120 V/C Ratio(X) 0.61 0.00 0.26 0.42 0.00 0.33 0.27 0.75 0.75 0.14 0.31 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 288 0 358 306 0 359 238 1715 913 582 2133 1120 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.2 0.0 50.6 56.3 0.0 51.2 61.2 52.5 52.5 32.0 11.7 11.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 0.0 0.5 1.3 0.0 0.8 0.7 3.2 6.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.2 0.0 1.9 2.9 0.0 2.5 1.5 18.0 19.7 1.8 4.6 5.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.3 0.0 51.2 57.7 0.0 52.0 62.0 55.8 58.5 32.1 12.1 12.5 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D E E E C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 181 168 1563 1101 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.5 54.9 56.8 13.6 Approach LOS E D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 50.1 58.5 26.4 18.0 90.6 26.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 68.0 30.0 18.0 69.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.2 39.9 19.9 5.2 14.4 15.0 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.5 0.5 0.0 8.4 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.0 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 71 60 75 86 60 121 100 1324 67 139 929 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 71 60 75 86 60 121 100 1324 67 139 929 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 74 62 78 90 62 126 104 1379 70 145 968 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 339 84 105 284 214 181 616 2518 782 197 1318 409 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.35 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 753 947 1781 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 74 0 140 90 62 126 104 1379 70 145 968 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1700 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 0.0 10.8 5.6 4.1 10.3 5.5 25.3 3.2 10.9 25.0 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.6 0.0 10.8 5.6 4.1 10.3 5.5 25.3 3.2 10.9 25.0 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 339 0 189 284 214 181 616 2518 782 197 1318 409 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.74 0.32 0.29 0.70 0.17 0.55 0.09 0.74 0.73 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 352 0 227 304 263 223 616 2518 782 290 2269 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 58.1 43.9 54.8 57.5 30.7 23.8 18.1 63.1 57.2 25.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 10.1 0.6 0.7 6.9 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.0 3.5 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.2 2.6 2.0 4.5 2.4 10.2 1.2 5.5 11.9 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 0.0 68.2 44.5 55.5 64.4 30.8 24.6 18.4 68.1 60.7 25.6 LnGrp LOS D A E D E E C C B E E C Approach Vol, veh/h 214 278 1553 1130 Approach Delay, s/veh 59.7 56.0 24.8 61.1 Approach LOS E E C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.9 72.6 20.5 21.0 52.7 40.9 20.1 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 55.0 16.0 18.0 17.0 60.0 15.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.9 27.3 7.6 12.8 7.5 27.0 6.6 12.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 11.9 0.1 0.3 0.1 7.9 0.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 42.8 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 69 80 1485 998 31 Future Vol, veh/h 0 69 80 1485 998 31 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 73 84 1563 1051 33 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 542 1084 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 415 356 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 415 356 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.5 0.9 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)356 - 415 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.237 - 0.175 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 18.2 - 15.5 - - HCM Lane LOS C - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - 0.6 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 50 76 102 74 23 44 Future Vol, veh/h 50 76 102 74 23 44 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 53 80 107 78 24 46 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 185 0 - 0 332 146 Stage 1 - - - - 146 - Stage 2 - - - - 186 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1390 - - - 663 901 Stage 1 - - - - 881 - Stage 2 - - - - 846 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1390 - - - 636 901 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 636 - Stage 1 - - - - 846 - Stage 2 - - - - 846 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.1 0 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1390 - - - 788 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 - - - 0.09 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn T:\3022\09\synchro\2018 PM.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 87 5 10 123 4 10 1 40 24 1 3 Future Vol, veh/h 1 87 5 10 123 4 10 1 40 24 1 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 92 5 11 129 4 11 1 42 25 1 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 133 0 0 97 0 0 252 252 95 271 252 131 Stage 1 - - - - - - 97 97 - 153 153 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 155 155 - 118 99 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1452 - - 1496 - - 701 651 962 682 651 919 Stage 1 - - - - - - 910 815 - 849 771 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 847 769 - 887 813 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1452 - - 1496 - - 693 645 962 647 645 919 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 693 645 - 647 645 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 909 814 - 848 765 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 836 763 - 846 812 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.5 9.3 10.6 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)886 1452 - - 1496 - - 668 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.001 - - 0.007 - - 0.044 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 7.5 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.6 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1340 155 186 933 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1340 155 186 933 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 24 9 113 22 131 20 1411 163 196 982 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 95 88 27 216 208 176 104 1717 198 687 3658 15 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 518 794 246 1376 1870 1585 1781 4642 536 1781 5249 21 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 0 113 22 131 20 1035 539 196 637 349 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1559 0 0 1376 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1867 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.4 9.4 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 9.7 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.4 9.4 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 0 216 208 176 104 1259 656 687 2372 1301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.74 0.19 0.82 0.82 0.29 0.27 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 0 0 297 319 270 198 1614 841 687 2372 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.1 0.0 0.0 57.4 54.0 58.1 59.2 30.5 30.5 28.6 7.6 7.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 6.1 0.9 6.1 11.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.6 0.7 14.0 15.5 4.4 3.3 3.7 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.2 64.2 60.1 36.6 41.6 28.9 7.9 8.1 LnGrp LOS E A A E D E E D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 57 266 1594 1182 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.8 61.3 38.6 11.4 Approach LOS E E D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.1 55.9 21.0 13.9 100.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 64.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 37.0 6.1 3.4 11.4 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 12.9 0.2 0.0 7.9 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.5 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 117 6 55 87 10 69 43 1410 94 79 921 90 Future Volume (veh/h) 117 6 55 87 10 69 43 1410 94 79 921 90 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 121 6 57 90 10 71 44 1454 97 81 949 93 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 196 23 223 212 31 217 160 1934 129 566 2950 288 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.32 0.62 0.62 Sat Flow, veh/h 1317 153 1455 1339 199 1416 1781 4890 326 1781 4729 462 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 121 0 63 90 0 81 44 1012 539 81 682 360 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1317 0 1608 1339 0 1615 1781 1702 1812 1781 1702 1787 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.2 0.0 4.7 8.6 0.0 6.0 3.3 38.7 38.7 4.4 12.7 12.8 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.2 0.0 4.7 13.2 0.0 6.0 3.3 38.7 38.7 4.4 12.7 12.8 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.26 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 196 0 246 212 0 247 160 1347 717 566 2123 1115 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.00 0.26 0.42 0.00 0.33 0.28 0.75 0.75 0.14 0.32 0.32 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 287 0 357 305 0 359 238 1715 913 566 2123 1115 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.1 0.0 50.4 56.2 0.0 51.0 61.2 52.3 52.3 32.9 11.9 12.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.1 0.0 0.5 1.3 0.0 0.8 0.7 3.2 5.9 0.1 0.4 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.2 0.0 1.9 3.0 0.0 2.5 1.5 18.3 20.0 1.9 4.8 5.2 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.2 0.0 50.9 57.6 0.0 51.7 61.9 55.5 58.1 33.0 12.3 12.7 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D E E E C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 184 171 1595 1123 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.4 54.8 56.6 14.0 Approach LOS E D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 48.9 59.4 26.7 18.1 90.2 26.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 68.0 30.0 18.0 69.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 40.7 20.2 5.3 14.8 15.2 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.7 0.5 0.0 8.6 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.0 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1351 68 142 948 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1351 68 142 948 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 64 80 92 64 128 106 1407 71 148 988 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 338 84 105 281 214 181 606 2517 781 197 1344 417 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 756 945 1781 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 0 144 92 64 128 106 1407 71 148 988 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1700 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.0 3.2 11.1 25.5 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.0 3.2 11.1 25.5 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 338 0 189 281 214 181 606 2517 781 197 1344 417 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.76 0.33 0.30 0.71 0.17 0.56 0.09 0.75 0.73 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 350 0 227 300 263 223 606 2517 781 290 2269 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 58.3 43.9 54.8 57.6 31.2 24.0 18.2 63.2 57.0 25.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.7 0.8 7.5 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.8 3.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.4 2.6 2.1 4.6 2.5 10.5 1.2 5.6 12.1 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 0.0 70.0 44.6 55.6 65.1 31.4 24.9 18.4 68.9 60.5 25.2 LnGrp LOS D A E D E E C C B E E C Approach Vol, veh/h 219 284 1584 1153 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.0 56.3 25.0 61.0 Approach LOS E E C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.9 72.5 20.5 21.0 51.9 41.5 20.1 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 55.0 16.0 18.0 17.0 60.0 15.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.1 28.0 7.7 13.1 7.6 27.5 6.7 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 12.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 8.1 0.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 70 82 1515 1018 32 Future Vol, veh/h 0 70 82 1515 1018 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 74 86 1595 1072 34 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 553 1106 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 408 348 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 408 348 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.8 1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)348 - 408 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.248 - 0.181 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 18.7 - 15.8 - - HCM Lane LOS C - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 0.7 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.8 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 51 78 104 75 23 45 Future Vol, veh/h 51 78 104 75 23 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 54 82 109 79 24 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 188 0 - 0 339 149 Stage 1 - - - - 149 - Stage 2 - - - - 190 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 657 898 Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 842 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 630 898 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 630 - Stage 1 - - - - 843 - Stage 2 - - - - 842 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3 0 10 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1386 - - - 785 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.039 - - - 0.091 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM nb.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 1 89 5 10 125 4 10 1 40 24 1 3 Future Vol, veh/h 1 89 5 10 125 4 10 1 40 24 1 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 94 5 11 132 4 11 1 42 25 1 3 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 136 0 0 99 0 0 257 257 97 276 257 134 Stage 1 - - - - - - 99 99 - 156 156 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 158 158 - 120 101 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1448 - - 1494 - - 696 647 959 676 647 915 Stage 1 - - - - - - 907 813 - 846 769 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 844 767 - 884 811 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1448 - - 1494 - - 688 641 959 641 641 915 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 688 641 - 641 641 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 906 812 - 845 763 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 833 761 - 843 810 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 0.5 9.3 10.7 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)882 1448 - - 1494 - - 662 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.061 0.001 - - 0.007 - - 0.045 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 7.5 0 - 7.4 0 - 10.7 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.1 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1341 155 186 948 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1341 155 186 948 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 24 9 113 22 131 20 1412 163 196 998 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 95 88 27 216 208 176 104 1718 198 687 3659 15 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 518 794 246 1376 1870 1585 1781 4642 536 1781 5250 21 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 0 113 22 131 20 1035 540 196 647 355 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1559 0 0 1376 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1867 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.6 9.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 9.7 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.6 9.6 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 0 216 208 176 104 1260 657 687 2372 1301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.74 0.19 0.82 0.82 0.29 0.27 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 0 0 297 319 270 198 1614 841 687 2372 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.1 0.0 0.0 57.4 54.0 58.1 59.2 30.5 30.5 28.6 7.7 7.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 6.1 0.9 6.1 11.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.6 0.7 14.0 15.5 4.4 3.4 3.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.2 64.2 60.1 36.6 41.6 28.9 7.9 8.2 LnGrp LOS E A A E D E E D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 57 266 1595 1198 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.8 61.3 38.6 11.4 Approach LOS E E D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.0 56.0 21.0 13.9 100.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 64.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 37.0 6.1 3.4 11.6 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 12.9 0.2 0.0 8.1 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.4 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 118 7 51 87 14 69 61 1401 94 88 924 86 Future Volume (veh/h) 118 7 51 87 14 69 61 1401 94 88 924 86 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 122 7 53 90 14 71 63 1444 97 91 953 89 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 197 29 222 219 42 212 179 1923 129 565 2899 270 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.32 0.61 0.61 Sat Flow, veh/h 1313 188 1425 1343 268 1358 1781 4887 328 1781 4752 443 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 122 0 60 90 0 85 63 1006 535 91 682 360 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1313 0 1614 1343 0 1626 1781 1702 1811 1781 1702 1791 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.3 0.0 4.4 8.5 0.0 6.3 4.7 38.5 38.5 5.0 13.2 13.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.6 0.0 4.4 12.9 0.0 6.3 4.7 38.5 38.5 5.0 13.2 13.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.25 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 197 0 252 219 0 253 179 1339 713 565 2077 1093 V/C Ratio(X) 0.62 0.00 0.24 0.41 0.00 0.34 0.35 0.75 0.75 0.16 0.33 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 284 0 359 308 0 361 238 1715 912 565 2077 1093 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 59.0 0.0 50.0 55.6 0.0 50.8 60.9 52.4 52.4 33.1 12.8 12.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.5 1.2 0.0 0.8 0.9 3.2 5.9 0.1 0.4 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.3 0.0 1.8 3.0 0.0 2.6 2.2 18.2 19.9 2.2 5.0 5.4 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 62.2 0.0 50.4 56.8 0.0 51.5 61.9 55.6 58.2 33.3 13.3 13.6 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D E E E C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 182 175 1604 1133 Approach Delay, s/veh 58.3 54.3 56.7 15.0 Approach LOS E D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 48.8 59.1 27.0 19.6 88.4 27.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 68.0 30.0 18.0 69.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.0 40.5 20.6 6.7 15.2 14.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.7 0.4 0.1 8.6 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.4 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1360 68 142 947 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1360 68 142 947 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 64 80 92 64 128 106 1417 71 148 986 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 338 84 105 281 214 181 607 2517 781 197 1342 416 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 756 945 1781 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 0 144 92 64 128 106 1417 71 148 986 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1700 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.3 3.2 11.1 25.4 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.3 3.2 11.1 25.4 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 338 0 189 281 214 181 607 2517 781 197 1342 416 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.76 0.33 0.30 0.71 0.17 0.56 0.09 0.75 0.73 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 350 0 227 300 263 223 607 2517 781 290 2269 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 58.3 43.9 54.8 57.6 31.2 24.0 18.2 63.2 57.1 25.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.7 0.8 7.5 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.8 3.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.4 2.6 2.1 4.6 2.5 10.6 1.2 5.6 12.1 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 0.0 70.0 44.6 55.6 65.1 31.3 24.9 18.4 68.9 60.5 25.2 LnGrp LOS D A E D E E C C B E E C Approach Vol, veh/h 219 284 1594 1151 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.0 56.3 25.1 61.1 Approach LOS E E C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.9 72.5 20.5 21.0 52.0 41.5 20.1 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 55.0 16.0 18.0 17.0 60.0 15.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.1 28.3 7.7 13.1 7.6 27.4 6.7 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 12.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 8.0 0.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 82 1516 1033 32 Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 82 1516 1033 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 78 86 1596 1087 34 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 561 1121 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 403 342 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 403 342 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)342 - 403 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.252 - 0.193 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 19 - 16.1 - - HCM Lane LOS C - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 0.7 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 78 104 75 23 45 Future Vol, veh/h 55 78 104 75 23 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 58 82 109 79 24 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 188 0 - 0 347 149 Stage 1 - - - - 149 - Stage 2 - - - - 198 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 650 898 Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 621 898 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 621 - Stage 1 - - - - 840 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.2 0 10.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1386 - - - 780 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - - 0.092 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 88 5 10 125 33 10 1 40 42 1 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 88 5 10 125 33 10 1 40 42 1 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 93 5 11 132 35 11 1 42 44 1 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 167 0 0 98 0 0 281 295 96 299 280 150 Stage 1 - - - - - - 106 106 - 172 172 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 175 189 - 127 108 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1411 - - 1495 - - 671 616 960 653 628 896 Stage 1 - - - - - - 900 807 - 830 756 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 827 744 - 877 806 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1411 - - 1495 - - 660 609 960 618 620 896 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 660 609 - 618 620 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 896 804 - 827 750 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 814 738 - 834 803 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.4 9.4 11.1 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)872 1411 - - 1495 - - 639 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 0.004 - - 0.007 - - 0.079 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.6 0 - 7.4 0 - 11.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.3 11: CSAH 17/France Ave & access 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b with France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 0 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 18 0 1597 1079 29 Future Vol, veh/h 0 18 0 1597 1079 29 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 19 0 1681 1136 31 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 584 - 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 - - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 390 0 - - - Stage 1 0 - 0 - - - Stage 2 0 - 0 - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 390 - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 14.7 0 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)- 390 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.049 - - HCM Control Delay (s) - 14.7 - - HCM Lane LOS - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - 0.2 - - 21: CSAH 17/France Ave & Hazelton Rd 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 1 1 1 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1341 155 186 948 4 Future Volume (veh/h) 23 23 9 107 21 124 19 1341 155 186 948 4 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 24 24 9 113 22 131 20 1412 163 196 998 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 95 88 27 216 208 176 104 1718 198 687 3659 15 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.49 0.49 0.39 0.70 0.70 Sat Flow, veh/h 518 794 246 1376 1870 1585 1781 4642 536 1781 5250 21 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 57 0 0 113 22 131 20 1035 540 196 647 355 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1559 0 0 1376 1870 1585 1781 1702 1774 1781 1702 1867 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.4 0.0 0.0 5.6 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.6 9.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 0.0 0.0 9.7 1.4 10.8 1.4 35.0 35.0 10.3 9.6 9.6 Prop In Lane 0.42 0.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.01 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 211 0 0 216 208 176 104 1260 657 687 2372 1301 V/C Ratio(X) 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.11 0.74 0.19 0.82 0.82 0.29 0.27 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 300 0 0 297 319 270 198 1614 841 687 2372 1301 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 1.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 55.1 0.0 0.0 57.4 54.0 58.1 59.2 30.5 30.5 28.6 7.7 7.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 6.1 0.9 6.1 11.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.7 4.6 0.7 14.0 15.5 4.4 3.4 3.8 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 55.8 0.0 0.0 59.4 54.2 64.2 60.1 36.6 41.6 28.9 7.9 8.2 LnGrp LOS E A A E D E E D D C A A Approach Vol, veh/h 57 266 1595 1198 Approach Delay, s/veh 55.8 61.3 38.6 11.4 Approach LOS E E D B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 58.0 56.0 21.0 13.9 100.1 21.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 30.0 64.0 23.0 15.0 79.0 23.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 12.3 37.0 6.1 3.4 11.6 12.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.5 12.9 0.2 0.0 8.1 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 30.4 HCM 6th LOS C 26: CSAH 17/France Ave & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1> 0 1 1> 0 1 3> 0 1 3> 0 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 127 7 60 87 14 69 61 1401 94 79 915 115 Future Volume (veh/h) 127 7 60 87 14 69 61 1401 94 79 915 115 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 131 7 62 90 14 71 63 1444 97 81 943 119 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 206 27 235 220 44 221 179 1923 129 554 2772 349 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.31 0.60 0.60 Sat Flow, veh/h 1313 163 1447 1332 268 1358 1781 4887 328 1781 4593 578 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 131 0 69 90 0 85 63 1006 535 81 698 364 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1313 0 1610 1332 0 1626 1781 1702 1811 1781 1702 1766 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.2 0.0 5.1 8.6 0.0 6.2 4.7 38.5 38.5 4.4 13.8 13.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 19.5 0.0 5.1 13.6 0.0 6.2 4.7 38.5 38.5 4.4 13.8 13.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.90 1.00 0.84 1.00 0.18 1.00 0.33 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 206 0 262 220 0 264 179 1339 713 554 2055 1066 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.00 0.32 0.35 0.75 0.75 0.15 0.34 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 284 0 358 299 0 361 238 1715 912 554 2055 1066 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.81 0.81 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 58.6 0.0 49.5 55.4 0.0 50.0 60.9 52.4 52.4 33.6 13.3 13.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.2 0.0 0.5 1.2 0.0 0.7 0.9 3.2 5.9 0.1 0.5 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 4.6 0.0 2.1 3.0 0.0 2.6 2.2 18.2 19.9 1.9 5.3 5.6 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 61.8 0.0 50.0 56.7 0.0 50.7 61.9 55.6 58.2 33.7 13.8 14.2 LnGrp LOS E A D E A D E E E C B B Approach Vol, veh/h 200 175 1604 1143 Approach Delay, s/veh 57.7 53.7 56.7 15.3 Approach LOS E D E B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 48.0 59.1 27.9 19.6 87.5 27.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 19.0 68.0 30.0 18.0 69.0 30.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.4 40.5 21.5 6.7 15.9 15.6 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.1 12.7 0.5 0.1 8.8 0.6 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 41.5 HCM 6th LOS D 1: CSAH 17/France Ave & Parklawn Ave 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 <1 0 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1360 68 142 947 16 Future Volume (veh/h) 72 61 77 88 61 123 102 1360 68 142 947 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 75 64 80 92 64 128 106 1417 71 148 986 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, veh/h 338 84 105 281 214 181 607 2517 781 197 1342 416 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.49 0.49 0.04 0.09 0.09 Sat Flow, veh/h 1781 756 945 1781 1870 1585 1781 5106 1585 1781 5106 1585 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 75 0 144 92 64 128 106 1417 71 148 986 17 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1781 0 1700 1781 1870 1585 1781 1702 1585 1781 1702 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.3 3.2 11.1 25.4 1.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 0.0 11.1 5.7 4.2 10.5 5.6 26.3 3.2 11.1 25.4 1.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 338 0 189 281 214 181 607 2517 781 197 1342 416 V/C Ratio(X) 0.22 0.00 0.76 0.33 0.30 0.71 0.17 0.56 0.09 0.75 0.73 0.04 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 350 0 227 300 263 223 607 2517 781 290 2269 704 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 43.4 0.0 58.3 43.9 54.8 57.6 31.2 24.0 18.2 63.2 57.1 25.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.0 11.8 0.7 0.8 7.5 0.1 0.9 0.2 5.8 3.4 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 2.1 0.0 5.4 2.6 2.1 4.6 2.5 10.6 1.2 5.6 12.1 0.5 Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 43.7 0.0 70.0 44.6 55.6 65.1 31.3 24.9 18.4 68.9 60.5 25.2 LnGrp LOS D A E D E E C C B E E C Approach Vol, veh/h 219 284 1594 1151 Approach Delay, s/veh 61.0 56.3 25.1 61.1 Approach LOS E E C E Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 20.9 72.5 20.5 21.0 52.0 41.5 20.1 21.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 22.0 55.0 16.0 18.0 17.0 60.0 15.0 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 13.1 28.3 7.7 13.1 7.6 27.4 6.7 12.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.2 12.2 0.1 0.3 0.1 8.0 0.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 43.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes User approved volume balancing among the lanes for turning movement. 24: CSAH 17/France Ave & 72nd St 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 1 1 3 3> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 74 82 1516 1033 32 Future Vol, veh/h 0 74 82 1516 1033 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 175 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 78 86 1596 1087 34 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 561 1121 0 - 0 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - 7.14 5.34 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - 3.92 3.12 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 403 342 - - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 0 - - - - - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 403 342 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.1 1 0 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h)342 - 403 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.252 - 0.193 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 19 - 16.1 - - HCM Lane LOS C - C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 0.7 - - 5: Parklawn Ave & Gallagher Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1 1> 0 1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 55 78 104 75 23 45 Future Vol, veh/h 55 78 104 75 23 45 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 58 82 109 79 24 47 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 188 0 - 0 347 149 Stage 1 - - - - 149 - Stage 2 - - - - 198 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 650 898 Stage 1 - - - - 879 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Platoon blocked, %- - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1386 - - - 621 898 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 621 - Stage 1 - - - - 840 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 3.2 0 10.1 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)1386 - - - 780 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - - - 0.092 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.3 2: access & Gallager Dr 03/29/2018 T:\3022\09\synchro\2020 PM b without France access.syn Synchro 10 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 0 <1> 0 Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 88 5 10 123 62 10 1 40 60 1 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 88 5 10 123 62 10 1 40 60 1 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - - - - - - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 93 5 11 129 65 11 1 42 63 1 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 194 0 0 98 0 0 293 322 96 311 292 162 Stage 1 - - - - - - 106 106 - 184 184 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 187 216 - 127 108 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1379 - - 1495 - - 659 595 960 642 619 883 Stage 1 - - - - - - 900 807 - 818 747 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 815 724 - 877 806 - Platoon blocked, %- -- - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1379 - - 1495 - - 648 588 960 607 612 883 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 648 588 - 607 612 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 896 804 - 815 741 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 803 718 - 834 803 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.4 0.4 9.4 11.5 HCM LOS A B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1 Capacity (veh/h)867 1379 - - 1495 - - 622 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.062 0.004 - - 0.007 - - 0.112 HCM Control Delay (s) 9.4 7.6 0 - 7.4 0 - 11.5 HCM Lane LOS A A A - A A - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0 - - 0 - - 0.4 The CITY of EDINA 7250 France Avenue –Comp. Plan Amendment & Rezoning The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 7 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 8 Sketch Plan The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Sketch Plan The CITY of EDINARevisions from Sketch Plan: EdinaMN.gov 10 ➢ Increased the Setback on France Avenue to 50 Feet at the base, retai ning podium set back of approximately 10 more feet at floors 2-6 on the majority of the façade. ➢ Increased setback at rear property (west side) to bring access street out from under the building. ➢ Incorporated a walkway on the west side adjacent to the buil ding and maintained the landscape buffer to the west. ➢ Build steps down along the west side to 5 stories with a setback at the 6th floor. ➢ Overall project size is approximately 8% smaller than the previous iteration. From 2.36 FAR to 2.18. ➢ North and west facades have greater development and improved pedestrian realm experience. ➢ Increased green roof area at 2nd floor plaza roof. The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 12 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 13 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 14 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 16 The CITY of EDINARequest Requires: ➢Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and ➢A Rezoning from POD-1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. www.EdinaMN.gov 17 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 18 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 19 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 20 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 21 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 22 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 23 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 24 City Standard (POD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – France Front – Gallagher Side – North Rear – West 90 feet (based on height) 80 feet (based on height) 80 feet (based on height) 80 feet based on height Four times the height from R-1 for 7 story building = 320 (based on 80 feet) 30-40 feet* (50 feet to curb) 30 & 55 feet* 35-40 feet* 20 feet* 400 feet Building Height Four stories and 48 feet 7 stories and 90 feet* Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) .50% 2.2%* Parking Stalls 270 enclosed (residential) 76 surface spaces Council may require surface stalls if deemed necessary. 346 Total 320 enclosed total 35 surface* 355 total Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issues ➢Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density reasonable? ➢Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site? EdinaMN.gov 25 The CITY of EDINAComprehensive Plan Amendment -Density ➢Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th street which connects France Avenue to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. EdinaMN.gov 26 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 27 Arterials The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 28 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 29 OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The City Council may approve a project for up to 80 units per acre through a PUD rezoning. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, underground parking, provision of affordable housing, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. The CITY of EDINAComprehensive Plan Amendment -Density ➢The densities are consistent with density considered in the Greater Southdale Area Study. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Aria Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. EdinaMN.gov 30 The CITY of EDINAComprehensive Plan Amendment -Density ➢Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. ➢Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units . ➢Traffic studies done by Wenk Associates & WSB conclude that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. EdinaMN.gov 31 The CITY of EDINAPUD Justification 1.Addresses Development Principles 2.Meets the PUD Criteria -creates a pedestrian friendly development with connections to adjacent property; buildings would be of high quality architecture; meets the affordable housing policy; eliminates surface parking; and enhance landscaping. 3.Roadways would support the project EdinaMN.gov 32 ➢ Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; ➢ Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; ➢ Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; ➢ High quality design; ➢ Public art; and ➢ Affordable housing within the project. (20%) The CITY of EDINARecommendation EdinaMN.gov 33 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 34 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 35 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 36 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 37 Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI I I.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: F rom:S haron Allis on, Executive As s is tant Item Activity: Subject:C orres pondence Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None. I N TR O D U C TI O N: T here are no correspondences since the last City Council meeting. Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: B.1. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: Minutes F rom:S haron Allis on, Executive As s is tant Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : Energy & Environment C ommission Aril 12, 2018 Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: I N TR O D U C TI O N: R eceive the April 12 minutes of the E nergy & E nvironment C ommission. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Minutes : EEC April 12, 2018 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 05/10/18 Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Energy and Environment Commission Edina City Hall, Community Room April 12, 2018, 7:00 p.m. I. Call To Order Chair Manser called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Fernands, Horan, Hussain, Jackson, Kostuch, Manser, Satterlee, and Seeley Late Arrival: Absent: Glahn, Hoffman, Madhok, and Waddick Staff Present: Staff Liaison Tara Brown III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Commissioner Jackson and seconded by Commissioner Kostuch to approve the April 12, 2018, meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Commissioner Kostuch and seconded by Commissioner Seeley to approve the March 8, 2018, meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. Community Comment – None. VI. Reports and Recommendations A. Election of 2018 Commission Chair and Vice Chair Chair Manser nominated Commissioner Jackson as chair and himself as vice chair. Motion made by Commissioner Jackson and seconded by Commissioner Seeley to approve Commissioner Jackson as EEC Chair and Commissioner Manser as EEC Vice Chair. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. Comprehensive Plan Discussion Chair Jackson updated the group on her presentation of EEC’s Comprehensive Plan recommendations to the Planning Commission. Planning Commission liked the matrix and agreed trade-offs are a part of the discussion. Recommended the residential definition used align with Planning Commission’s definition and add transportation as a topic area. Discussed the top three messages for the May 3rd meeting. C. Education and Outreach Update The Education and Outreach Working Group is finalizing events. The July Fourth Parade will be a main event and tabling other Edina events. Commissioners discussed a working group’s interest in representing the EEC during door knocking this month with Student Earth. Commissioners did not want the group to represent the EEC and the city, but they are free to represent themselves other organizations. Commissioner Satterlee discussed potential ideas for a 2019 Earth Day Event. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 05/10/18 VII. Correspondence and Petitions A. Working Group Minutes • Minutes received from Education and Outreach Working Group. VIII. Chair and Member Comments Chair Jackson shared updates from the CERTs Conference and recognized the group for the Clean Energy Award. Chair Jackson and other commissioners attended an event where 30 cities were invited and 28 participated. There was discussion and sharing of initiatives and challenges. Motion made by Commissioner Jackson and seconded by Commissioner Manser to remove Peter Liska from the Business Energy Efficiency Working Group. All voted aye. Motion carried. Vice Chair Manser shared a New York Times article on reducing your carbon footprint. Commissioner Horan shared that there is a pre-emption bill at the state to pre-empt municipalities on banning particular to-go packaging. Commissioner Fernands shared the Student Earth Group will have an event on May 5. IX. Staff Comments Next month’s meeting will be filled with staff presentation and updates on the Conservation and Sustainability Fund and Green Fleet work. Staff recognized there is an opportunity to share more than just the increase in the Conservation and Sustainability Fund by sharing the uses and impacts. X. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Manser to adjourn the meeting. Motion seconded by Commissioner Seeley. All voted aye. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 05/10/18 J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 4 NAME Glahn, William 1 1 1 3 75% Hoffman, Howard 1 1 1 3 75% Horan, Michelle 1 1 1 3 75% Hussian, Paul 1 1 Jackson, Carolyn 1 1 1 1 4 100% Kostuch, Keith 1 1 1 1 4 100% Manser, Richard 1 1 1 1 4 100% Satterlee, Lauren 1 1 1 1 4 100% Seeley, Melissa 1 1 1 1 4 100% Waddick, Louise 1 1 1 3 75% Fernands, Madeline (s) 1 1 1 1 4 100% Madhok, Gauri (s) 1 1 1 3 75% ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: B.2. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: Minutes F rom:Emily Bodeker, As s is tant C ity P lanner Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : Heritage P res ervation C ommis s ion, April 10, 2018 Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description Minutes : Heritage Preservation Commis s ion, April 10, 2018 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 8, 2018 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Heritage Preservation Commission Edina City Hall Tuesday, May 8, 2018 I. Call To Order Vice Chair Birdman called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call was Chair Birdman and members Aderhold, Schilling, Davis, Kelly, Nymo, Mondry, and student member Sipes. Staff Liaison, Emily Bodeker, and Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel were also in attendance. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion was made by Nymo and seconded by Schilling to approve the meeting agenda. All voted aye. The Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion was made by Kelly and seconded by Davies to approve the minutes from the March 13, 2018 Heritage Preservation Commission meeting. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Community Comment: None VI. Reports/Recommendations A. Certificate of Appropriateness: 4610 Drexel Avenue Staff Liaison Bodeker explained that the Certificate of Appropriateness request for the Tudor Revival style home built in 1936 entailed removing and replacing the existing attached garage (and adding on 6 feet to the west) and a small addition to the rear of the home. Ms. Bodeker concluded that she agreed with Consultant Vogel’s positive evaluation of the request and recommended approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness conditioned on the plans presented. Applicant Present- Kevin Becker and Susan Jalics Becker Motion was made by Kelly and seconded by Aderhold to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness request for the new attached garage subject to the plans presented. All voted aye. The motion carried. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: May 8, 2018 B. Heritage Preservation Award As of the meeting date, the City received one nomination for the 2018 Preservation Award. Nominations were due Wednesday, April 11th. The Commission decided to review the one application received. If another nomination is submitted, the Board will review all applications at the May 8th HPC meeting. Motion was made by Birdman and seconded by Kelly to accept the Heritage Award nomination as submitted with the condition that no other nominations are submitted by the deadline. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. Preservation Basics Preservation Consultant Vogel told the Commission he plans to go over some preservation basics over the next few meetings. He discussed how the State Preservation Office is now housed in the Office of Administration. VII. Correspondence And Petitions: None VIII. Chair And Member Comments: IX. Staff Comments: A. Staff informed the Commission that the State Preservation Office requested a picture to use for the National Alliance of Preservation Commission’s FORUM 2018 in Des Moines this summer. Staff will send out an email to the Commission with dates and times for the picture. X. Adjournment: 9:00 p.m. Motion made by Nymo to adjourn the April 10, 2018 meeting at 9:00 p.m. Motion seconded by Davis. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Emily BodekerEmily BodekerEmily BodekerEmily Bodeker Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: B.3. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: Minutes F rom:Jackie Hoogenakker, P lanning Divis ion Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : P lanning C ommis s ion April 25, 2018 Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None required. I N TR O D U C TI O N: P lease see approved April 25, 2018, P lanning C ommission Meeting Minutes. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Minutes : Planning Commis s ion April 25, 2018 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 1 of 11 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers April 25, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:05 P.M. II. Roll Call Answering the roll were: Commissioners Miranda, Lee, Thorsen, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Chair Olsen. Student Members, Jones. Staff, City Planner, Teague, Assistant Planner, Bodeker, Communication Cord, Eidsness, Support Staff, Hoogenakker III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda A motion was made by Commissioner Thorsen to approve the April 25, 2018, meeting agenda. Commissioner Berube seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes A motion was made by Commissioner Strauss to approve the minutes of the April 11, 2018, meeting minutes. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Berube. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. Public Hearings A. Variance request for setback from Lake Cornelia continued to May 9, 2018. Commission Thorsen moved to continue the variance request for May 9, 2018. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Variance Request. 5801 Abbott Avenue, Edina, MN. Staff Presentation Planner Bodeker reported that Ron Sonnek with Sicora Design Build, the applicant, has submitted a 9.3-foot side yard setback variance at 5801 Abbott Avenue on behalf of the homeowners. The proposed project includes a whole house remodel, which involves constructing a second story above the existing first floor and building a Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 2 of 11 detached two-stall garage. To accommodate the proposed changes the applicant is requesting a variance due to the existing non-conforming setback on the north property line. Bodeker explained that the existing non-conforming setback on the north side property line is 5.7 feet. The zoning code requires a 15-foot side street setback. The applicant is asking for a variance to maintain the current 5.7-foot setback on the north side of the property while adding a second floor above the existing one story home. Bodeker concluded that staff recommends approval of a 9.3-foot side yard setback variance for the north property line at 5801 Abbott Avenue, subject to staff findings and subject to the following conditions: • Survey dated 1-29-18 (emailed to staff April 11, 2018) • Elevations and building plans date stamped March 16, 2018 • Compliance with the conditions and comments listed in the Environmental Engineer’s memo. Appearing for the Applicant Ron Sonnek, Sicora Design Build Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. No one spoke to the issue. Commissioner Miranda moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions A comment was expressed that it was positive to see only an addition of a 2nd story vs. the teardown rebuild the Commission usually sees. Commissioners indicated that as presented the variance made sense, there was obvious non-conformity and the request was reasonable. Motion Commissioner Lee moved variance approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Thorsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. 7250 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 3 of 11 Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the applicant, France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of the 1.68-acre parcel at 7250 France Avenue. As proposed, the development would include the following: A 6-7-story, 76-89 foot tall, 135-unit apartment with 320 underground parking spaces. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. Twenty percent (20%) of the unit area would be for affordable housing, which exceeds the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. Retail & Office space totaling 19,000 square feet. Thirty-five (35) surface parking spaces for the retail use. Sustainability. LEED or Green Globe designation would be pursued. Pedestrian and vehicular access is proposed to the lot to the north (7200 France). Amenity terrace including a pool. Teague explained that the primary vehicle access points would be off France Avenue and Gallagher Drive. This access road would also serve the 7200 France site to the north to reduce traffic on 72nd, as has been recommended in previous development proposals for that site. Teague asked the Commission to note that the applicant has gone through the sketch plan process, and the Greater Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson of AFO, Architecture Field Office has provided a review as well. The applicant has responded to the development principles, AFO’s comments, and feedback received from the sketch plan, and has revised the plans as follows: Increased the Setback on France Avenue to 50 Feet at the base, retaining podium set back of approximately 10 more feet at floors 2-6 on the majority of the façade. Increased setback at rear property (west side) to bring access street out from under the building. Incorporated a walkway on the west side adjacent to the building and maintained the landscape buffer to the west. Build steps down along the west side to 5 stories with a setback at the 6th floor. Overall project size is approximately 8% smaller than the previous iteration. From 2.36 FAR to 2.18. North and west facades have greater development and improved pedestrian realm experience. Increased green roof area at 2nd floor plaza roof. AFO has reviewed the revised plans and offered the following: The building is now a “four-sided” building, whereby all four facades are treated as primary. The building’s relationship to the woonerf on the west side of the site is vastly improved, in that the drive is no longer underneath the building. The pedestrian pattern seems appropriate and thought out. The woonerfs on the west and north are pedestrian friendly, suggesting use by pedestrians first, bikes second, cars third and service vehicles fourth. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 4 of 11 The public realm design, including the variety in paving and landscaping depicted in the renderings reinforces the pedestrian experience. The scale and treatment of the public realm/pedestrian experience along France and Gallagher is open and flexible. The building’s northwest corner is better scaled in relation to the adjacent three story buildings. Teague told the Commission to accommodate the request the following is required: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and A Rezoning from POD-1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. In conclusion, Teague recommended that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District in the Greater Southdale Area from 30 units per acre to 80 units per acre; and Approval is also subject to the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-90 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed-use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units. 5. The traffic study done by Wenck Associates concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. Teague noted he has provided findings for denial if the Commission so decides based on the following findings: 1. This area west of France and north of I-494 is considered a transition area between the high- density commercial development on the east side of France and the single-family homes to the west and north. 2. The density proposed is too high for the OR, Office residential district. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 5 of 11 Continuing, Teague recommended that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from MDD-6, Mixed Development District to PUD-16, Planned Unit Development District, including an Overall Development Plan and Preliminary Development Plan for Phase 1 based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site and connect to the Regional Trail and Fred Richards Park to the north. Provides the potential for additional public space along the north lot line in conjunction with Fred Richards Park; Opportunity to provide increased stormwater and ponding features in connection to Fred Richards Park; High quality building design; and The potential for significant affordable housing within the project. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 6 of 11 ii. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 7. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 8. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated March 28, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. Of the proposed housing units, 20% must be dedicated for affordable housing and meet the conditions of the City’s affordable housing policy. 9. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated April 18, 2018. 10. Compliance with the Wenck Associates Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 11. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 12. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 7 of 11 13. Dedication of public access easements along the west and north lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the property to the north, 7200 France Avenue. Appearing for the Applicant Dean Dovolis and Sheldon Berg, DJR Architects. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners raised the following: • It was pointed out that the proposal as submitted incorporates a number of the Greater Southdale Area Guiding Principles. Teague agreed, noting the favorable comments from Mic Johnson, Consultant. • A question was raised if the Commission can suggest a limited approval (Rezoning/Comp Plan). Approve the rezoning; and not approve an Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Teague responded that can be done; however, the guide designation for this site is OR and that definition would not change if not amended. Teague said he was unsure if the proposal could proceed without that amendment. Amending the Comprehensive Plan in the areas guided OR would only allow (if certain conditions are met) an increase in density from the allowed 30-units. Any requests for rezonings, development plan, etc. would continue to need review and approval from the Commission and Council. • Planner Teague was asked if there was any consideration on increasing the height of the building along France Avenue because of its distance from the single dwelling unit district. Planner Teague responded he believes the applicant is satisfied with the building height as presented. • It was suggested for future projects that bus stops be highlighted. Teague agreed that was a good suggestion. • It was noted that the County was not very receptive to the City’s goal of creating “mini” blocks that would require access to France Avenue. Teague agreed that was true; however, the applicant indicated they would continue to petition the County for those cuts and would keep the north area between 7250 and 7200 France available for access to France. Applicant Presentation Mr. Dovolis addressed the Commission and informed them Planner Teague was correct in reporting that the County was hesitant to allow additional curb cuts onto France Avenue. Dovolis said in his opinion the County wants “superblocks”. Dovolis said he was aware that the City Council has been in talks with Hennepin County about France Avenue and the greater Southdale Area, adding he supports those talks and would appreciate it if the Council continued with those talks. Continuing, Dovolis reiterated that the County was hesitant to allow mid-block curb cuts; however, one was allowed in the Byerly’s redevelopment project. Dovolis said the County appears to respond on an individual site basis. With graphics, Dovolis highlighted the project as follows: • Increased setback on France Avenue. • The building is a “four-sided” building. • Podium setback of approximately 10 more feet at all floors 2-6 on the majority of the façade. • Increased landscaping. • Increased pedestrian amenities on France Avenue • Increased setback at rear of property (west side “woonerf). This brings the access-street out from under the building as depicted at Sketch Plan. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 8 of 11 • Overall size is approximately 8% smaller. • Increased Green Roof area. • North and west facades have greater development and improved pedestrian realm experience. • Indoor and outdoor bike parking stalls are provided. • Fast Charge EV Charging Stations are planned. • Enhanced Storm Water Management. • Provides affordable housing near commercial nodes. Ed Tehar, Wenck continued the presentation and agreed that there needs to be continued work with the County to allow additional curb cuts on France Avenue; however, Tehar said the site as proposed is designed to function if the curb cuts are not permitted. It was further pointed out the County has been allowing mid-block curb cuts on York Avenue. With graphics, Tehar highlight aspects of the traffic report. Continuing, Tehar noted that the traffic generated by the proposed development would have minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service movements. Tehar said if the County does not allow France Avenue access Gallagher Drive would result in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher intersection. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners expressed the following: • Concern was expressed that during peak hours a southbound turn onto Gallagher and a northbound turn onto Gallagher could become problematic. Dovolis agreed that certain movements could increase backup. It was suggested that signs be posted prohibiting turns during peak hours. Tehar said that step would only be effective if there was an enforcement element present. • Dovolis was asked the reason affordable housing was provided at 20%. Dovolis said in his opinion the 20% ratio works best in providing housing for support staff, teachers, etc. • Teague was asked if a rezoning to PCD would allow the project. Teague responded in the affirmative. Dovolis commented that the requested rezoning to PUD is the right designation for this site. Affordable housing is encouraged under the PUD zoning. • Staff was asked if the subject site were redeveloped to strictly office use would the traffic impact be less. Mr. Tehar responded that it would depend on the type of office use. If the use were medical office, there would be greater impact; however, if it were zoned straight office he believes the result would be comparable to what was proposed. • Mr. Dovolis was asked what would happen if the County prohibits additional curb cuts on France Avenue. Dovolis responded that he would continue to work with the County for this right. He said as previously noted that the site could function without the additional curb cuts; however, he feels confident curb cuts would be granted especially if 7200 were redeveloped. • It was suggested that more attention be paid to the west elevation. More articulation needs to be introduced. It appears too flat. • A suggestion was made to consider that all sides of the building appear active – consider more retail. • A concern was expressed about the woonerf on the north side of the building and if that area would be safe for pedestrians and bikers. Dovolis explained that around the building there are defined sidewalk areas to ensure safety for all pedestrians. With regard to bike trails, Dovolis stated they would need to work with the County especially along the south side and France Avenue. It was noted that it was Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 9 of 11 important for the project to be able to connect to the trails. Dovolis agreed adding the key is connections to cross the streets. • It was pointed out that the subject site is served by bus lines, adding it would be important for the residents of the building to be aware of this amenity. Dovolis agreed, adding they will work with the MTC on the possibility of providing protected bus stops. • Support was expressed for the project; to include its height, access, shadow study, affordable housing, building materials etc. • On the west side, ensure that the covered pedestrian pathway is a safe and desirable place to walk as it abuts vehicle space. Consider adding public art to that building wall and create a flexible space. Find a subtle way to also educate people Public Hearing Chair Olsen opened the public hearing. The following residents spoke regarding the project: • Mr. and Mrs. John Carlson, 4433 Ellsworth Drive, Edina, MN • Bill Griffith, representing the property owners of the Cedars Apartment Buildings. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Bennett seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Discussion/Comments/Questions A discussion ensued on Affordable Housing, unit pricing and renters vs. property owners. It was noted except for the Estelle proposal, which was denied that all new housing in Edina appears to be rental. Teague agreed adding while the City has development policies; one being affordable units the decision by the Commission cannot be based on if the units are for rent or to own, luxury or market rate. Commissioners shared the following comments and opinions: • The project as proposed “hits” on a number of issues and has the support of the consultant for the Greater Southdale Area. A concern was expressed that it appears Hennepin County has a “big” say in France Avenue, noting if there was a weak point in this project it was the north side. Dovolis agreed, stressing they would continue to work with Hennepin County, adding he appreciates any help the City of Edina can be in securing the curb cuts on France Avenue. • The project is much improved from Sketch Plan. Great job! • The commitment to long-term thinking was much appreciated. • Continue to pay attention to the details of the project. The finishing details are very important. • Asked the Council to continue to support the goal of developing smaller blocks with access to France Avenue. • The project as presented meets the concerns expressed by the Commission and Council at Sketch Plan Review. A discussion ensued on the projects requested approvals especially amending the Comprehensives Plan OR designation. An opinion was expressed that re-guiding the entire OR district for just one project seems extreme. Teague stated the City’s policy is to amend/re-guide the entire district; it does not re-guide on a site- by-site basis. Teague explained that re-guiding the OR District does not mean that all OR designations can now have up to 80 units per acre. It only gives the properties designated OR the opportunity to achieve 80 units per Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 10 of 11 acre. Every parcel in the OR, Office Residential District that requests redevelopment would still be required to go through the process. Continuing, Teague said allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units; however, he reiterated re-guiding the designation does not mean, “blanket approval”. There is and will continue to be a public hearing process. The discussion continued on approval and if the Commission can require curb cuts as part of the conditions for approval. It was noted that if the County prohibits those curb cuts and the curb cuts were a condition of approval the project would not proceed. Dovolis stressed that he would continue to work with the County on the curb cuts, if not today in the future. He reiterated the project as designed functions without the curb cuts; however, it was acknowledged that the curb cuts are important. It was acknowledged that the Commission would prefer the curb cuts onto France Avenue as a condition of approval. However, Commissioners expressed the opinion that if approved without the curb cuts as a condition that that more attention be paid to the north side, better articulate and enhance it. It was also expressed that the project is best with access onto France Avenue. Motion Commissioner Hamilton moved to recommend preliminary approval of the rezoning and amendment to the Comprehensive Plan based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Thorsen. Ayes; Miranda, Thorsen, Strauss, Nemerov, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Olsen. Nays; Lee. Motion carried 8-1. VI. Reports/Recommendations None. VII. Community Comment None. Commissioner Thorsen moved to close public comment. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. VIII. Chair And Member Comments Commissioner Strauss said the 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan Group is continuing to review the final plan. When the plan is in its final form, it will be presented to the Commission and Council for comments. Commissioner Hamilton and Nemerov said volunteers are still needed to serve on the 50th and France Small Area Plan Work Group. The application deadline date is May 30th. Commissioner Lee announced there would be a Community Housing Forum held on Thursday, May 31, 2018 at the Southdale Library from 7-8:30 PM. IX. Adjournment Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/9/2018 Page 11 of 11 Commissioner Thorsen moved to adjourn the January 24, 2018, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 9:30 PM. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Jackie Hoogenakker Jackie Hoogenakker Jackie Hoogenakker Jackie Hoogenakker Respectfully submitted Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: B.4. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: Minutes F rom:C hante Mitchell, C ity Management F ellow Item Activity: Subject:Minutes : Human R ights and R elations C ommission, April 24, 2018 Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: April 24 M inutes I N TR O D U C TI O N: AT TAC HME N T S: Description April 24 Minutes Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/22/18 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights and Relations Commission Edina City Hall, Community Room April 24, 2018 7:02pm I. Call To Order Chair Nelson called the April 24, 2018, meeting of the Human Rights and Relations Commission to order at 7:02pm. II. Roll Call Answering Roll Call: Chair Nelson and Commissioners Arseneault, Beringer, Edelson, Edwards, Epstein, Kennedy, Meek, Moore Stringer, and Student Commissioner Sinha. Staff Present: Staff Liaison, MJ Lamon. Absent: Student Commissioner Mangalick. III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Commissioner Kennedy to approve the meeting agenda for April 24, 2018. Seconded by Commissioner Edelson. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Commissioner Kennedy to approve the April 3, 2018, Human Rights and Relations Commission meeting minutes. Seconded by Commissioner Edelson. Motion carried. V. Community Comment Community member Rebecca Nicklay, 5920 Bonnie Brae Drive, spoke about her family’s experience when her son was cut from an Edina Baseball Association team this spring. She described the issue as a matter of how we treat kids with special needs. Kids Playing For Kids, a nonprofit organization that connects chronically ill kids with local sports team, was working with the family to get their son on a baseball team but when they were not successful in Edina, the organization was able to place their son on a Bloomington team. VI. Reports and Recommendations A. 2018 Work Plan Updates Sharing Values, Sharing Community Initiative Update: Commissioner Edelson reported that committee members will be meeting in May. Race and Equity Update: Staff Liaison Lamon gave an update on the Race and Equity Task Force work session with City Council on April 17. The Final Report will go to Council on May 15, and then the Report goes Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/22/18 to staff. Staff will provide comments on recommendations which they will put into an operational report. Lamon noted that the Taskforce has not completed their Accountability recommendation. Kennedy moved that HRRC would like to be a consulting partner in the ongoing implementation of the race and equity recommendations set forth by the Taskforce. Commissioner Beringer seconded. Motion carried. B. Comprehensive Plan Submission Chair Nelson discussed the work session meeting with the Planning Commission on April 25. Chair Nelson and Commissioner Kennedy summarized the commission’s recommendations for presentation to Planning Commission on April 25. Kennedy will present the HRRC’s proposed Human Rights Chapter and Chair Nelson will present an overall summary of the HRRC’s recommendations. Commissioner Arseneault will attend the Comprehensive Plan check-in meeting on May 3. C. 2018 Days of Remembrance Commissioner Arseneault reviewed the logistics for the May 6 event. The Mayor will give opening remarks. It was agreed that Commissioner Stringer Moore will MC the event. Commissioners volunteered for event day set up and poster distribution duties. VII. Correspondence None. VIII. Chair and Member Comments Nelson: Commented on article in Minnesota History magazine (published by Minnesota Historical Society) on slave holders making money in Minnesota even though slavery was not legal in Minnesota. Edelson: Reported on Bus Circular Taskforce meeting, including the outcome of the survey of seniors, and the plan to operate the bus on Fridays from 10 – 3, with 15 stops (grocery stores and medical places) during a one-hour loop. It will be free for seniors to ride. Meek: Advised that she has been talking to the public schools about race and equity and feels there is an opportunity for better communication with the schools about the work of the HRRC and the Taskforce. Kennedy: Informed about a Community Housing Forum on May 31 at 7 pm at Southdale library; and, that World Without Genocide will present an Upstanders Award to a Turkish scholar on the Armenian Genocide, Dr. Taner Akcam, on May 14. Also noted that the untested rape kits legislation is pending in the Minnesota House and Senate. Moore Stringer: Inquired whether there is a possibility to do a community round table discussion on the day of Starbuck’s training on May 29. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 5/22/18 Beringer: Noted that the Beacon Cooperative on 66 West has a request for funding for affordable housing organizations in the current bonding bill pending at the Minnesota legislature. IX. Staff Comments Staff Liaison Lamon reminded commissioners about the midpoint check-in meeting for the Comprehensive Plan with Councilmember Fischer on May 3 at 6:00 pm at Public Works. X. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Kennedy to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Edelson. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:07pm. Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: X.A. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: F rom:James B. Hovland, Mayor Item Activity: Subject:R ace & Equity Task F orc e F inal R eport F ollow-up C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: I N TR O D U C TI O N: T he Mayor will give a verbal report at the meeting. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Staff Pres entation The following report contains more than 200 anonymous comments provided by community members who shared their experiences in Edina through a survey. The survey did not ask for any identifying information such as people’s names or dates and therefore likely includes recent experiences as well as incidents that occurred years or decades ago. The report also contains experiences captured through phone interviews, large community dialogue sessions and small gatherings hosted in people’s homes. In order to get the most honest feedback possible, confidentiality and/or anonymity was at the heart of the feedback tools used in the Race & Equity Task Force’s process. Living through the experiences shared in this report may feel frightening, isolating and traumatizing.Talking about them can stir up those same feelings again. Hearing about them may feel very uncomfortable and unsettling. And, yet, they must be considered in order to attend to the impacts on our community members and ensure that the circumstances and conditions under which they occurred are changed forever. The Task Force’s intent was not to gather information for individual response, and therefore the incidents reported have not been investigated. Acquiring honest and confidential feedback was important because it helped the Task Force and working groups develop more specific recommendations. Regardless of any specific situation, the survey comments show that there are people in Edina who do not feel welcome because of their race. Further, because of the distress caused by incidents like the ones included in the report, it may be assumed that there are experiences yet unshared and invisible to the Task Force and the broader community. We are all accountable for creating a community where every person can contribute, thrive and enjoy the benefits of all our city has to offer. “I was invited to [participate in a youth sports activity in a City facility]. In the locker room after the first practice, [some of the older players] started calling a younger, black player racial slurs and eventually started punching him and choking him while calling him the n-word.” Date: June 5, 2018 Agenda Item #: XI I. To:Mayor and C ity C ouncil Item Type: F rom:Debra A. Mangen, C ity C lerk Item Activity: Subject:S chedule of Meetings and Events as of June 5, 2018 Information C ITY O F E D IN A 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov A C TI O N R EQ U ES TED: None I N TR O D U C TI O N: S ee attached. AT TAC HME N T S: Description Schedule of Meetings & Events as of June 5, 2018 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF JUNE 5, 2018 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues June 5 Joint Meeting: Transportation Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting: Community Health Commission 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur June 14 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues June19 Joint Meeting: Human Rights & Relations Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session: Golf Course Construction Update 6:15 P.M., COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur June 28 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed July 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed July 4 Edina’s Fourth of July Parade – Starts behind Edina City Hall 10:00 A,M, Tues July 17 Work Session: CRBPS Assess Management 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Southdale Small Area Plan 6:15 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur July 26 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues July 31 City Council Candidate Filing Opens 8:00 A.M. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE Tues Aug 7 Nite To Unite Wed Aug 8 Work Session: CIP 2-19-2023/City Enterprises (Cost Recovery Formulas) 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 14 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY – Polls open 7 A.M. THROUGH 8 P.M, City Council Candidate Filing Closes – City Clerk’s Office remains open until 5:00 p.m. CITY CLERK’S OFFICE Thur Aug 16 HRA Meeting 7:30-9:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 21 Work Session: Community Engagement Planning 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS