Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19561008_REGULARI L lo/$/% MINUTES OF THE REG= "I'ING OF THE EDINA ) 293 .VILLAGE COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY, OCTOBER 8, 1956, AT 7:30 P.M., AT THE EDINA VILLAGE HALL i INVOCATION was given by the Rev. J. L. Ran? of Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church. ROLLCALL was answered by Trustees Bank, Bredesen, Fronk and Tupa, and by Mayor Er icks on. NINUTES of the Regular Meeting of September 24, 1956, were approved as submitted, by Motion Fronk, seconded by Tupa and carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PFDPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: Clerk presented Affidavits of Publi- cation in Edina-Morningside Carrier September 27 and October 4, 1956, of !*Notice of Hearing .on Proposed Storm Server hprovementy11 and "Notice of Hearing on Pro- posed Blacktopping Xmprovementtt . Affidavits were approved as to form and .ordered placed on file, and, pursuant to said Notices, the following Public Hearings were conducted, and action taken: 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED STORM SEWEB AND APPURTENANCES IN NORHANDALE COURT (NORTH) FROM THE LOW POINT 250 FT. IdEST OF STATE HIGHWAY #lo0 TO POND IBST. Manager Hyde reported Engineer Zikan's Estimate of Cost at $5,530.00 as against 158,300 Square Feet, for about $6 per assessable square foot. He explained that the low bid received today was $5,212.50, as compared with engineer's construction estimate of $4,937.50, making cost very Slightly higher than estimate. ELr. John 71. Bishop, 5037 Normandale Court, filed a written complaint against the improvement, complaint being based upon his opinion that proposed taxation for improvement is not equitable. Ralph Peterson, stated that the proposed cost per lot is far beyond the expectations of the Normandale Court residents as to cost; that his client, Dr. Peterson, tvants the rest of the people in Normandale Court satisfied, even if he loses the dirt he put into the street; that Dr. Peterson is very much opposed to a storm sewer if it ~iiU mean hardship to the residents concerned; that he is here to advise the Council that, rather than construction of a storm sewer, Dr. Peterson prefers that the road be left at its present level--in which case he will have to seek other methods of recourse for his damages. Nr. Folke Victorsen, developer of IJVictorsen's Addition to Nomandale Court11, explained once again that he had taken dirt from Normandale Court North at the request of the Village; that he ~dl1 now be substantially danaged if there is any change from Village plans of two weeks ago, because he has since laid two concrete driveways and done some other related work. had been reached at the last meeting, between the Council and all those then present, with the exception of Nr. Taylor. Resolution and moved its adoption: Attorney Barto, representing IINorrnandale Courtll developer, Dr. Trustee Bank reminded Council and audience that an agreement He then offered the following RESOLUTION ORDERING IHPR(lVE2~ STORM SEbER IMPRUDVEtBNl! NO. 37 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published-on the follow- ing proposed improvement: CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE STORM SEWER Ah! APPUEETENANCES IN NOR1ANDAL;E COURT (NCBZTH) FROM THE LOW POIWT 250 FT. W. OF STATE HIGHWAY #lo0 TO POND NEST and at the hearing held at the time and place spcified in said notice the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement; that said improvement is hereby desig- nated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as STOR14 SEXtER DPROVEbEHT NO. 37, and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall be as follows: I~Comm. at intersection of Ely extension of N. line of Lot 1, Victorsen's Addn. to Normandale Court and Centerline of State Hw-y.#lOO; th. Sly along centerline of State Hwy.#lOO to its intersection with Ely exbension of S. line of Lot 1, B1. 2, Normandale Court; th. Wly to Sf Cor. of said Lot 1; th. NCLy to a pt . on NWly line of Lot 2, B1. 2, Normandale Court, which pt. is 35 Ft. SKLy, measured along saLd NWly line from SWly line of Normandale Court; th. NI4l.y parallel to and 35 Ft. Dist. from tlny line of Normandale Court to N. line of Lot 6, B1. 2, Nomandale Court; th. Illy along N. line of said Lot 6 to a pt. 30 Ft. W. of SE Cor. of Lot 6, Victorsen's Addn. to Normandale Court; th. Nly, NEly and Ely, parallel to and 30 Ft. Dist. from Fny line of Turn-around at W. end of Normandale Court to W. line of Lot 4, Victorsen's Addn. to Normmdale Court;th.El.y:ta-a pt. on E.line of said Lot 4, which point is 35. Ft. N. of SE Cor. of said Lot 4; th. Ely to a pt. on W, line of Lot 2, Victorsen's Addn. 10/8/56 29f2to Zormandale Court, which point is 35 Ft. N. of SW Cor. of said Lot 2; th. Ely to a pt. on the E. line of said Lot 2, which point is 30 Ft. S. of the N[;' Cor. of Lot I, Victorsen's Ad&. to Normandale Court; th. Nly to the fiT[.l Cor. of said Lot 1; th. Ely along the 11. line of said Lot 1 and its extension to the centerline of State Highway 130, 100, which is the point of beginning,'( Notion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Fronk, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as follows: B Tupa, aye; and Erickson, aye; and the Reso 2. PUBLIC HEXRING ON PROPOSED BLACKTOPPING OF RYAN AVENUE EEWEEN vamy vmr ROAD $ND 11,62ND STRE%p, Re. Zikan's Estimate of Cost was read at 84,267.20, as against 1,821.81 Assessable Feet, for $2.34 per Assessable Foot. explained to Council that street must be blacktopped (or additional gravel must be put in for a stretch of about 150 feet south from Valley View Road) if the street is to drain, Er. Kirk, 6121 Ryan, tho had filed a petition for Oiling with the Village Clerk between the last Council 3feeting and this date, stated he is opposed to Blacktopping; and 1-fessrs. Allivato, Hutton, Olson and Johnson all confirmed his opinion, stating they are so loaded with assessments now that they do not want another major hpmvement at this time. property owners vere of the opinion that the developers should be obliged to furnish the extra gravel, but it was explained that Ryan is 2j1 below Valley View because Valley View has been blacktopped; that, had the additional 2" of gravel been placed on the road by the developer, it would have to be removed at the time of blzcktopping. Residents explained that this is not a heavily traveled street; that blacktopping is not needed. It was explarined to them that an Oil Coat is a one-year project, that they will be assessed each time they petition for oil, whereas blacktop VU be maintained by the Village. a question to 1-ir. Zikan concerning cost of additional gravel needed to raise the road to the grade of Valley View, he explained this cost should be around $7.9. Tupa moved that Council abandon proposed Blacktop project; that Petition for Oil be accepted and that necessary gravel be included in the Oiling Project. Motion seconded by Bank and carried. Engineer All these On I CONTINTJ-@ION OF PUBLIC HEARING OF AUGUST 27. ON PROPOSED BLACKTOPPING OF AYRSHIRE BLXD., DONCASTER WAY TO l7. LINE OF EDINA HIGHLANDS ADDITION. Council was reminded that Hearing had been continued to this date because 3lr. Rosendahl. is constructing a home in the area and had felt that heavy construction trucks would break up the new improvement. agreed that construction of improvement be postponed until nex* spring, Bredesen's motion, that Public Hearing on BlackLopping be continued to the spring of 1957, was seconded by Fronk and carried. I&. Victorsen, petitioner for the improvement, stated he has A3TAR.D OF BIDS TMZN PRIOR TO 3SEEZING. Manager Hyde presented tabulation of bids taken at 1O:OO A.N., today, on the following, and made his recommendations as hereinafter recorded: Phelps-Drake Go., with bid of $88,262.10, which is slightly below Estimate. Hyde recommended award to 1017 bid, subject to the Village's securing easements, which are still to be obtained. carried, Art Bolier, with bid of7$5,212.50, which is slightly above Estimate. Bredesen moved for award of contract to low bidder. Only one bid received-that of Earl Sewall at $3,570.00. heldthis evening, Bredesen moved for rejection of bid. and earied. I. STOFilf SBfER NO, 35 - (Birchcrest Area). Low Bidder of three bids received, &. Fronk so moved. Hotion seconded by Bredesen and Low Bidder of two -0 bids received, 2. STO€U-I SErn NO. 3 - (Normand&e Court) , Notion seconded by Tupa ad carried. 3. BLP,Ck"rOPPIfCG OF RYAN Am, 9W062ND ST, TO VAIJAY VIEN ROAD. In view of outcome of Public Hearing Hotion seconded by Fro& BLAC-XTOPPnG OF AYRSHIBE BLVD., DONCASTER WAY TO I.I.LINE OF EDINA HIGHLANDS--Bids taken August 2.7, 1956. Because of outcome of tonight's Hearing, Bredesen moved for rejection of all bids. Hotion seconded by Fronlc and carried, PWLIC HEARINGS ON PEOPOSED SPECIAL ASsESSl.mWS FOR IKFFtOVEI~~S. Afzidavit of Publication in Edina-Norningside Courier on September 20 and 27, 1956, of "Notice of Assessent Hearings on Sanitary Lateral Sewer Improvements Nos. 80, 101,103,10?,10S,109,1~0,~,~,113,~ andIl5," and, pursuant to said Notice, the followiing Public Hearings were conducted, and action taken: Josephine Ave, betireen Benton Ave. and V.60th St., and in W.6Oth St. between Hwy. #lo0 and Code Ave. (15 Yr. Assessment). at $l.4,579.97, as against 2,585.1 Assessable Feet, for $5.64 per Assessable Foot, against an Estimate of Cost of $5.08. There were no objections registered at the Hearing, and none had been received prior thereto. (See Resolution of later in Neeting, approving.) Clerk presented 1, PUBLIC €iiL~DlG ON PROPOSED AssEsS?*m FOR SANfi'ARY LATERAL Smm NO. 8O--k Hanager Hyde read Tabulation of Assessment 2. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMXNT FOR SANITARY ILATU SENE8 NO. 101--k Mendelssohn Lane from Naloney Ave. to Blake Rd. Assessment at $8,928.65 as against 1,644.3 Assessable Feet, for $5-59 per Assess- able Foot, as compared with Estimate of $4.32. project. assessment be placed on a fifteen-year basis if possible; and, after checking the bond covenant, Attorney Xindhorst advised that this can be done; although first year's payment should- be one-tenth the cost because time is now too short €or correction of the assessaent. assessment at one-tenth payment for first year; balance over fourteen years.) Valley View Road from St.Johns Ave. to 160 Ft. E,; Valley View Road from St.Johns Ave. to 168 Ft. If. against 577 Assessable Feet, for $&8? per Assessable Foot, as compared with Estimate of $6,82, No objectiors were registered from the floor, and none had been placed prior to the Hearing. Brookview Ave. from W.63rd St. to W.64th St. Nanager Hyde read Tabulation of Assessment as $4,207.45, of which $1,899.45 is to be charged against Sanitary Trunk Sewer No. 69, leaving a balance of $2,308.00 to be assesssd against owners of abutting properties having a total of 577 Assessable Feet, for an Assessment of $4.08 per Assessable Foot, as compared with Estimate of Cost, of 57.62. were no objections from the audience, and no objections had been received prior to the Hearing. (See Resolution of later in meeting, approving.) Benton Ave. , from existiing Nanhole W. of Code Ave. to Approx. 80 Ft . 11. of Assessment was read as $828.74, as against 251.9 Assessable Feet, for $3.29 per Assessable Foot, as compared with $3.01 Estimate of Cost. registered from the floor, and no written objections had been received prior to the Hearing. Code live., to serve #58O8 and #5816. $1,750.97, as against 265.7 Assessable Feet, for $6.59 per Assessable Foot, for favorable comparison with Estimate of $6.70. There were no objections from the floor, and no written objections had been filed prior to the Hearhg. Resolution of later in meeting, approving.) Glengarxy Parkway from Ayrshire Blvd. to Hwy.#l69. read as $6,981.52, as against 1,918 Assess8ble Feet, for $3.64 per Assessable Foot, compared with Estimate of $3.98. and no written objections had been received prior to the Hearing. of later in meeting, approving.) Tracy Ave., Grove St. to Grove St6 (South EA.); Grove St., Tracy Ave. to Stuart Ave.; Stuart Ave. from Grove St. to Broadview Rd.; Bmadview Rd. from Stuart Ave. to Tracy Ave. Tabulation of Assessment was read as $18,318.l4, as against 2,792.4 Assessable Feet, for $6.56 per Assessable Foot, as compared with $6.51 Estimate. Fredlund complained that there is now only hll to 611 of gravel on his road, whereas there was formerly l2**. matter. There were no objections from the floor, and no written objections had been received prior Lo the Hearing. Naloney he., Nendelssohn Lane to serve 6420 and 6424 Naloney Ave. Assessment was read at $1,858.61, as against 221 Assessable Feet, for $8.LJ per Assessable Foot, as compared with Estimate of $8.84. from the floor, and none had been received prior to the Hearing. of later in meeting, approving.). Hanson Rd., Birchcrest Dr, to Valley View Rd.; Illaddox Lane, TQ?man Ave. to 345 Ft, ?I.; W.62nd St., Wyman Ave. to Hanson Rd. Tabulation of Assessment was read at $17,069.66, as against 2,927.9 Assessable Feet, for $5.83 per Assessable Foot, as compared with $6.19 Estimate. There were no objections registered from the floor, and none had been received prior to the Hearing. in meeting, approving,) Bernard Place from W.6Oth St. to Grove St. &3,4.72,67 as against 2,223.8 Assessable Feet, for $3.81 per Assessable Foot, as compared with Estjmate of $4.28. Hexing, and no written objections had been received prior thereto. Resolution of later in meeting, approving.) Manager Hyde read Tabulation of Audience was reminded that cost is above estimate because developers decided upon winter work for this \ Dr. Peterson, one of the developers of the addition, asked that I (See Resolution of later in meeting, approving 3. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSNENT FOR SANITARY UTERAL SENER NO. 103--b I1.lanager Hyde read Tabulation of Assessment as #2,f$3.&9, as . (See Resolution of later in meeting, approving.) 46 PUBLIC KEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR SANITARY LATERAL SENE3 NO. 107--lh There 5. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESS= FOR SANITARY UTERAL SEI.ER NO. 108--In Tabulation No objections were (See Resolution of later in meeting, approvhg.) 6. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSIV'T FOR SANITP!Y LATERAL SEWER NO. 109--Ln Tabulation of Assessment was read as (See 7. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSNENT FOR SANITARY LATERAL SEWER NO. llO--k Tabulation of Assessment was There were no objections from the floor, (See Resolution 8. -- PUBLIC HEXRING ON PROPOSED ASSBSTm FOR SANITmY LATEULL SE'WEFt NO. lll--ln He was informed this is a maintenance (See Resolution of later in meeting, approving.) 9. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSIENT FOR SANITARY L4TERAL Smm NO. 112--In Tabulation of There were no objections (See Resolution 10. PUBLIC €IEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSJGNT FOR SANITARY LATERAL sE(2fER NO. 113--In (See Resolution of later 11, PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSTJIEiVT FOR SANITARY L!I'ERAL SEXFB NO. 114--In Tabulation of Assessment was read as There were no objections registered at the (See io/&r/56 29612, ?UBT-;IC: €IXEXNG 014 PBOPOSED ASSESSUEHT FOR SAIJfTARY LATERAL SENER 140, U5--In Grandview Lane from existing manhole on Grandview Lane to W. 52nd St, ; V.%nd St. , Grandview Lane to Bedford Ave,; Bedford he., i.t.52nd St. to Interlachen Blvd.; Interlachen Blvd., IJilliam Ave. to Bedford Ave.; Vandervork Ave., Interlachen Blvd, to Hollywood 8d.; Hollywood Rd., Vandervork Ave. to Rutledge Ave.; Rutledge Ave., HoU-yr.~ood Rd. to tJ.48th St.; XXLian Ave., 7’1.52nd St. to Interlachen Blvd.; Hollywood Rd., Word Ave. to Vandervork kve. Tabulation of Assessment was read as $58,66,?+&, as against 6,918 Assessable Feet, for $8.48 per Assessable Foot, compared xith Estlbte of $7.58, residents had asked for a fifteen-year assessment at the Hearing on Improvenent, because ofthe very high cost of this improvement. He asked, once again, that Council approve a fifteen-year term. Attorneylfindhorst stated he believes bond fund can carry this; and audience was informed that, because time is so shorb, it will, be impossible to correct this .yeas’s assessment, but that Council will comply 16th request insofar as possible, by dividing nine-yeas babnce over . fourteen years. protested to pamg for the replacement of blacktopping as part of their assess- ment, claiming they could have been served from the main a% IT.52nd St., but I.%.. Zikan stated tha1.t; their cost would have been greater, had a small contract been awarded for just this project. 14r. Robert TI. Nolting, 514.0 ITiU-iUn, complained that the street has already been oiled, but that the 611 of gravel, in the street before it vas dug up for the sewer, has not been replaced. He was bformed that this matter would be investigated and corrected. (See Resolution adopting assess- ment on one-tenth the first year, balance o§er fourf;een-years basis) Fro& offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: I&. William Duggan reminded Council that a The oimers of residences at 5113, 5116 and 5133 IJilliam Ave. €ESOLUTION ilDOPTING AND CONFIRNING ASSESSJEI@S FOR smnmy mm ~mmmm NOS. m, 101, 103, 107, 108, I.o~;u-Q, xn, ‘~1~2,-ii3,. L~,AND n.5 BE IT RESOLVED by the ViUage Council of the Village of Edina, 1-besota, as follo-rus : 1, SANlfiraRY sEI.IER IEPR0VEf~I’~S NOS. 80, 101, 103, 107, 108, 109, U-0, lll and 112, and each of them, have been properly calculated in accordance with the provisions of Ennesota Statutes Section 4l2.443.; that notice has been duly published as required by law, that this Council tJould,meet to hear and pass upon a11 objections, if any, to amend said proposed assessments as mi&t be necessary, and to adopt the same by resolution; that said proposed assessments have at all times since their filing been open for public inspection, and 0pportUni”cy has been given to all interested persons to present their objections; and that each ofthe lots, pieces and parcels of land enumerated in the res-pective assessment;s was and is specially benefited by the construction of the improvement for which assessment is levied 5n the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece and parcel of land respectively, 2, The mounts so set out are hereby levied against the respective lots, pieces and parcels of lsnd described in said respective assessments, and said proposed assess- ments we herebr adopted and confirmed as the proper special assessments for said improvements respectively, together with the interest accruing on the SUU amount thereof from tirne to time unpaid, & the rate of five percent per annum from the date of this resolution, shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes upon $he property described therein and all thereof, The total atnount of each such assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No.80 shall be payable in equal consecutive annual installments exbending over a period of fifteen years, the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1957, to be payable t6.h the general taxes. for the year 1956, and one of the remaining installments, with one year‘s interest on that and all subsequent instaUments, to be payable with general tws for the years 1957 through 1970, collectible in the respective ensuing years. The total amount of each such assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvaent No, 101, and for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 115, shall be payable in consecutive annual. installments exbending over a period of fifteen yqas, the first of said instalhents being one-tenth of the principal assessment, together with interest on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1957, to be payable wLth the general taxes for the year 1956; and each of the remaining assessments to be one-fourteenth of the balance of the principal assessment, with one year’s interest on that and all subsequent installments, to be payable %kth general taxes fbY the years 1957 through 1970, collec-t;ible in the respective ensuing yeas. The total amount of each such assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvements Nos. 103, 107, 108, 109, llO,lll, U2, U-3 and ll.4 shall be Rayable in equal consecu- tive annual installments extending over a period of ten years, the 3irs-L of .said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1957, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 2956;and one of the remaining installments, with one year‘s interest on that and all subsequent installments, to be payable with general tws for the year 1957 through 1961, collectible in the respective ensuing years. It is hereby found, determined and declared that the proposed assessments for B The assessment against each lot , tract or parcel, ~ 10/&2/56 Prior to certification of the assessments to the County Auditor, the owner of 297 3. any lot, piece or parcel of land assessed hereby may pay the whole of such assess- ment or any installment thereof without interest to the Village Treasurer and thereafter such payment may be made with accrued interest to the County Treasurer; provided that if any assessments or installments thereof be prepaid to the Village Treasurer, they shall be cancelled on the books of the Village Treasurer, and he shall promptly notify the Village Clerk and County Auditor, and the assessment or installment so prepaid shall'be cancelled on the books of the County Auditor. &, The Clerk shall, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessments, with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter cause said assessments to be collected in the manner provided by law. designated as ASSESSMENT ROU FOR SAIVITARY SEfiJER IWROVEMENTS ROS. 80, 101, 102, 107, 108, 109, 210, 111, 112, 113, 1l.4 and 115; and all amounts collected in respect of the assessments therein contained shall be similarly designated by the County Treasurer and remitted to the Village Treasurer, and by him credited to the BOND INRI OVEMENT R.EDEt!E" ION FUNI) . I' \ Said duplicate assessment roll shall be Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there were aye; Fronk, aye; Tupa, aye; REQUEST FOR RETURN OF EASDGNT. Storm Sewer Easement dated April 1, 1953, in the S.10 Ft, of N.109.98 Ft. of S 1/2 of NEl/l+ of NE1/4 of NE1/4, Sec0l9,T.28, R.24W. was filed and considered. Bredesen's motion, that action on request be delayed to next meeting, for Engineer's report as to Village need for easement, was seconded by Tupa and carried. REQUEST FOR CHAJJGE IN STmT NAME. the change of the name of "Roycar Road" was submitted. petitioner be asked to have Post Office approve names submitted, vias seconded by Bredesen and carried. I&. Douglas E. Reite's request for return of The October 4th request of HOC. Ormes, for Fronk's motion, that l4.IINN. Rn eC FJHSE. COMMISSION'S ORDm TO EXTEND BUSES INTO SOUTHDALE, dated October 1, 1956--and establishing fares as follows: Tare beyond city limits of Ifieapolis shall be 15$ for transportation between two points on said route both of which are outside the City of Minneapolis; a fare of lo$ in addition to the prevailing fare in the City of Minneapolis for transportation between a point on said route without the City of Knneapolis and a point within the City of Minneapolis . "--was submitted and ordered placed on file. PROTEST AGAINST PROPOSED llINDUSTRIAL PARK", filed by E.W. Johnson, 4.426 Chowen Ave., who is building in Edina, was reviewed and ordered placed on file, ER. E.C.STO(rJ'S RE&UEST FOR ANS?ER TO HIS LETTER OF OCTOBER 3RD received the following Council attention: Manager Hyde reviewed for I&. Stow and the Council action taken in 1952 and 1953 abandoning procedure on this same sewer for the reason that owners of abutting properties did not favor it, I&. Stow maintained that the majority of the property owners would now be in favor of the improvement; and Bank moved that the Council schedule Public Hearing on the project for Nonday, October 22, 1956, and that bids also be taken on that date. Notion seconded by Tupa and carried. reported that Nr. Stow's Engineer, Mr. Arle Smith, had submitted plans to this office only todaz-and then, only after we had called him; that EJLr. Zikan plans to schedule Public Hearing on this project for October 22. His request for a service road along Lake Edina Addition. Concerning this request, Mr. Stow's letter stated the Highway Department has informed him that one thing which is delaying the road is Mr. Chapmen's property directly South of Lake Edina, which has not yet been dedicated. I&. Chapman protested this from the audience. He stated he did not know there had ever been any request for a dedication of land for Highway purposes; that the Highway Department is set up in a way to be able to purchase such rights of way; that there is no zeason why he should make dedication of his land, onlyto have the Highway Department purchase land in Bloomington. Engineer Zikan contradicted lab. Chapman's first statement, reporting 14r. Chapman had been informed upon platting his preliminary plat that a dedication for street would be expected. highway service roads are the responsibility of the State Highway Department, that the Village can do little to expedite construction. the letter of inquiry mitten by him to I@. E. J, McCubrey of the Highway Deparbment, on October 18, 1955, inquiring about proposed plans for the service road. E-, Stow explained he is unable to get gas mains for the Addition unless plans for roads are 1. His request for Sanitary Sewer to serve his home at 3913 W.Wh St. 2. His request for Storm Sewer for Rookview Heights Second Addn. Nanager Hyde 3. Manager Hyde explained that the He read for the Council lo/& i/56 zqq completed; or, as an alternative, if the mains can be put in Wrough in an easement for an east-west road in the Chapan plat. FINAL PLAT OF ROJLAND'S ADDITION, a re-plat of Lots 4 and 5, Block 3, ation for approval. carried. ( Heights Addition, vas presented, pith Planning Commission's October 3rd recornend- Bredesen's motion approving plat was seconded by Tupa and the back Brookside FINAL PUT OF **DANIJOHW, the H.11. Johnson plat North of Hi&wa,y 169 and East of Victorsent s Addition to Edina Highlands, was presented. Nr. Victorsen protested that the School Board has planned the new school in this area, with only one entrance; that fire equipment and maintenance crews must lrgo round robin-hood's barn11 to reach the building, Mr. Hyde informed the Council the School Board had notified him that they Itdo not care to get in from Highway jf16911. Tictorsen asked that Council give additional thought to another road, and Bredesen moved that plat be referred to School Board for study and report as to access road to School. Motion seconded by Fro& and carried. FINAL PUT OF RYAN AVENUE SECOND ADDITION, the plat of Mr. Harold Hardacker or" one lot on the West side of Ryan Avenue between Valley View Road and N.62nd St., came before the Council with Planning Commission's recommendation for approval subject to engineering check. Jfr. Craig Wing asked that Hr. Hardacker be required to pay for his share of the graveling of Ryan Avenue. objected on the grounds that he is platting only one lot; that he was not informed of such requirement. Nk. Zikan reported that final. cross-sections must be had on the street before final approval is given. pending report by Zikan as to acceptance of street. Rr, Er. Hardacker Natter tabled HOPKINS' PROPOSAL BEGAFLDDIG ROAD BEX" HAREISON AVENUE &?D BLAKE ROAD was tabled in zccord with Planning Commissionts recommendation of October 3, by motion Bedesen, seconded by Fronk and carried. for the tabling of the matter until neighborhood could be contacted with regard to use of Spruce Place, and to opening of Dearborn, Arthur and Griffit Streets , Conrmissionts suggestion PELS FINJL PUT 'OF RICHARD R. LUNDGREN ADDITION, a re-plat of lots in Norinandale Second Addition, was approved by motion Bredesen, seconded by Fronk and carried, This in accordance with Planning Commission's recornendations of October 3. FIiIAL PLAT OF fEL0DY icN0ZJ;s SInH ADDITTION, by Ernest Hansen, tms presented, carrying the Planning Commission's October 3rd recommendation for approval subject to approval of a storm sewer after public hearing thereon. Council suggested that developer be required to construct his 0r.m stom sewer, but Engineer Zikan reported that the drainage area is larger than this particular plat; that properties in the other %elody KnollsI' plats have now passed from the hands of the original developers. Bredesen's motion, concurring in Planning Connnission1 s recommendation, was seconded by Tupa and carried, COUIJCIL, PWJING COXMISSIOX, PARK BOARD joint discussion meeting to be held the l5th, TELS called to Council's attention by 'lhnager Hyde. l?EEI;DflXJ5iY PLAT BY E. F. GARRISON, for a portion of the Streetcar Right-of- Way between Harrison and Hadison Avenues, was studied, and Bredesen moved for concurrence with Planning Commission's recommendation of October 3rd, that plat be returned to developer for re-submission. Hotion seconded by Fronk and carried. - TCX.JN "G ON YOUTH. Council discussed matter of proposed Town Neeting on Youth, as advocated by Parent and Teachers Coordinating Council. that a Citizens Committee of six be vested with the responsibilities of the meeting, including scheduling of the time therefor, securing site, speakers, and establishing topics to be discussed, three of which members trill be appoinked by the Council, and the other three to be appointed by the School Board. Notion seconded by Tupa and carried. Bredesen moved PBOPOSED RECIpEIlCAL UTILITIES AGEtEEXENT WECH RICHFIEID. This agreement, as discussed at the last meeting, was brought to Council's attention by lhnager Byde, who suggested that the 'IConnection Charge" for water in Xerxes Avenue Tron W.62nd St, to 11.66th St. be reduced from $5.40 to $2.50 per front foot, for the reason tht the developers are putting in their opm laterals in this area. Attorney Windhorst suggested that the Council approve the agreement this evening, subject to Bk, Hydefs recommended change and subject to Richfieldts approving the reduced figure. Fronk's motion, for authorization to the Iiagor and Village T-hger to sign the agrement in accord with recommendations by Hr, Windhorst and T-b, Hyde, was seconded by Tupa and carried. 10/8 2/56 PROPOSED SPECIAL POLICE ORDINANCE. Council reviewed draft of proposed ordinance, presented to them earlier, and discussed ordinance. adoption of Ordinance, and the entrance by the Village into an agreement with Southdale whereby Southdale agrees to indemnify the Village and save it harmless from claims resulting from ,!3ctions of Southdale's special police, the following Ordinance for adoption, moving that Council waive second reading and adopt Ordinance as submitted: 2% Village Attorney advocated / + Bank offered ORDINANCE NO. 12-4 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE APPOINTNENT OF PEACE OFFICERS ABENDING ORDINANCE NO, I2 THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: read Section 1, Section 2 of Ordinance No, 12, is amended to read as follows: All offices and positions in "Section 2, the municipal employ, now existing or hereafter created, shall be subject to the provisions of this ordinance, except that: (1) The following offices and positions shall be wholly exempt from the provisions of this ordinance: (a) (b) (c) Village attorneys. (d) Village Manager and Engineer. (e) Clerks of Court (f) Health Officers. (g) Volunteer Fire Department . (h) Those employees who are subject to the provisions of Civil Service Status and ordinances shall be exempt fromthose provisions of this ordinance which are inconsistent with Civil Service provisions of law. Section 2, Positions Covered by the Ordinance. Officials elected by the people. Members of Boards and Commissions. Peace officers appointed pursuant to Section 6.51 of Ordinance No. 12, (2) Tberecshall be added to Ordinance No, 12 a new Section to as follows: Section 6.51 Special Peace Officers, When circumstances warrant, the Village Manager may, from time to time, appoint special peace officers to supplement the police force of the Village in protecting and pre- serving order upon and adjacent to private premises. peace officers may be compensated by private persons, but shall receive no compensation from the Village, shall not be employees of the Village for any purpose whatsoever, and shall not be subject to the provisions of Ordinance No. 12, Such specid. peace officers shall be appointed on such terms and conditions as the Village Nanager may deem proper, shall serve under the direction and supervision of the Chief of Police, and shall have their jurisdiction limited to such geographical =ea as the Village 14anager shall direct. The Village lhager shall make each such appoint- ment in writing, which written appointment shall contain the tern and conditions of the appointment, the geographical area to which the juris- diction of the appointee is limited and the consent of the appoihtee to the appointment. on being filed with the Village Clerk. Such special Each such written appointment shall become effective Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in effect from its passage and publi- Notion for waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance as submiked was (cation. seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as follows: Bank, aye; Bredesen, aye; Fronk, aye; Tupa, aye; Ordinance was adopted. ATTEST: son, aye; and the -,&&e/& / Village Clerk Bank then moved, authorizing Mayor and Village Manager to sign agreement with Southdale, on behalf of the Village, saving Village harmless from liability and/ or expense arising out of activities of persons employed by Southdale and appointed as special peace officers by Edina. carried, Hotion seconded by Tupa and PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 191-3, Ordinance, and its relation to traffic activities in Southdale. the following Resolution, moving that Council waive second reading and adopt Discussion was had on adoption of this proposed Bank offered Ordinance as submitted: ORDICJAT!JCE NO. 191-3 AN ORDINANCE TO PROMOTE AND CONSEEtVX THE; PUBLIC SAFETY ON PRIVATE ROADS AND DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING LOTS WEHIN THE VILLAGE AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 191 THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDIHA, MINNEXOTA, ORDXIItS: read as follows: - Section 1. Ordinance No, 191 is amended by adding a new Section to lO/G ,156 3?0 W. Application to Private Pmper%g. All provisions of this ordinanca applicable to pedestrians or the drivers of vehicles or bicycles upon the streets, highways, or sidewalks of the Village shall qply, except where clearly inapplicable, to pedestrians and the drivers of vehicles and bicycles on private roads and driveways of the Village, including off-the-street parldng areas in or adjacent to Automobile Parking, Community Store, Commercial, Regional Shopping and Regional Nedical Districts Eanager may from time to time establish the mash speeds at w'hich vehicles and bicycles maybe driven in such off-the-street parking areas. and shall be based on .the reqyirements of safety in the parking areas affected. Each such tpeed limit shall be established in writing, filed with the Village Clerk and shall become effective as an absolute speed lirnit on being sign-posted at each entrance to the parking area affected thereby and no person shall drive a vehicle or bicycle on such parking area at a speed in excess thereof. The Village Such speed Limits may vary from parking area to parking area Section 2, This Ordinance shall be 5n effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Eotion for waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance as read was seconded by Fro&, and on Rollcall there were f Bredesen, aye; Fronk, aye; Tupa, aye; adopted. PROPOSED li.PROVET~~ OF FMCE A"lE BE2IEEN 'Tf.54TH STREET &JD APPROX. W.64TH STREFT ?.knager Hyde reported that a former Estimate on acquisition of right-of-my can be revised frm $9,050 to $6,050. He explained that, in line with other work done, the proposal wuld be to assess residential property along France Avenue for 1/3 the cost of the paving and the full cost of the curb and gutter; that commercial property xould be assessed full cost of construction, both paving and curb and gutter; that Village General Fund would bear the balance of the Village share of this work, it being understood that the County will bear its share of the paving. He suggested that, if Council decides to ini.ia€e. @Pocedure; :a hblic Hearing be scheduled, soon, on this improvement. Fronkcs motion, that Hearing be scheduled for Honday, November 12, was seconded by Tupa and carried, SPECIAL MSESSbmfl POLICY REGARDING *1TANGENTII ASSEsSI4El!lT ON COli!lJEFt LOTS. Report by Don Brauer, Administrative Assistant , advocating a "per benefit unit" assessment on contow+pht%ed lots; and also advocating that, if Council does not wish to establish this form of special assessment levy, tangent lots be assessed on a tangent of not more than fifteen feet, vas reviewed and discussed. Zr. OrDonnell, Naomi Drive, explained procedures practiced by other municipalities, one of these procedures Being to spread 60% of the assessment on a front-footage basis and the other 40% on the interior lots as well as the corner lot. Some considerable discussion was had, and Bredesen moved that Council adopt the policy of a ma3drmunl+foot assessment $or tangents on corner lots, and that any further action be tabled pending further study. Motion seconded by Fronk and carried, I PROCEDURE OI? OILING ASSESSI-ENTS vas reviewed &- Council by Attorney t'iindhorst, who suggested that if' Council wishes to include anything but just the ordin- "dust coating" in an Oiling improvement, a regular Vublic Hearing on be conducted before improvement is constructed. PROPOSED PUBLIC HEXRINGS, AND BIDS: Cost for proposed storm semr in brook vier^ Heights Additions, as prepared by Kr. hleigh C. Smith, engineer employed by developer Stow. He suggested that Council conduct a Public Hearing on this proposed improvement on October 22, if possible, Bredesen offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina: The Village Engineer, having submitted to the Council a prel.iminary reporb as to the feasibility of the proposed Storm Sewer Impmvment described %n the Form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improve- ment, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on 2U-e in the office of the Village Clerk. Edina VZUage Rally to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said proposed jmprnxmrent. Engineer Zikan presented Plan and Estimate of RESOLUTION PROVIDIXG FOR PUBLIC €EAlUNG PROPOSED STCRM SEHEX?, IC*lPROVEMEXiT 1. 2. This Council shall meet on Nonday, October 22, 1956, at 7:30 P.l-I,, in the lo/’ Q/56 3. The Clerksis hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, SF$ place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper oncer a week for two successive weeks, the second of FJhich publications is to be not less than three days from date of said meeting, which notice shall be in sub- stantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEIBING ON PROPOSED STO~JT SEWEB IMPROVEMZNT NOTICE IS mEBY GrvEN that the Edina Village Council will meet at the Village Hal on Mondzy, October 22, 1956, at 7:30 P&e, to consider the following pr6posed improvemat to be constructed under the authority graded by Minnesota Laws of 1953, Chapter 398, Consulting Engineer, Arleigh C. Smith, as set forth below: CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE STORM SEx”tTER AND APPURTENANCES IN: Everett Place, from Nine-Mile Creek to Duggan Plaza; Duggan Plaza from Everett Place to Duggan Plaza Circle; Tifton Drive from Everett Place to Ridgeview Drive The approximate cost of said improvement is estimated by the EST. COST $l-4,500 .OO The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of said improvement includes all lots and tracts of land within the following described boundaries: flCommencing at a point in the Westerly line of Lot 19, Block 7, Brookview Heights Sednd Addition, distant 30 feet Southerly of the South line of Abercrombie Drive; thence in a Southeasterly direction, parallel to and 30 feet from the South line of Abercrombie Drive to the centerline of Lot 16, said Block 7; thence North- easterly to a poin-b on the West line of Lot 4 in the Beplat of Lots 6 through 13, Sotic herly line of Tifbon Drive; thence Sou-bheasterly, Easterly and Northeasterly, parallel to the Soubherly and Easterly line of Tifton Drive, to the North line of Lot 10, Block 2, Brookview Heights 2nd Addition; thence Northwesterly to a point on the South line of Lot U, Block 6, Brookview Heights Ist Addition, distant 94 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Lot 11; thence Northerly and North- westerly, parallel to and distant 40 feet from the Southwesterly line of Meadow Ridge, to the Easterly line of Lot 5, Block 6, Brookview Heights 1st Addition; thence Southwesterly to a point on the West line of Lot 2, Block 6, distant 130 feet Southwesterly of the South line of Meadow Ridge; thence Northwesterly to the Northwest comer of Lot 6 in the Replat of the Southerly 1/2 of Block 7, Brookview .,<..* Heights lst Addition; thence Southwesterly dong the Northwesterly lot line of said Lot 6 and its extension, to the cederline of Duggan Plaza; thence North- c* westerly along said centerline and its extension to a point on the Northerly he of Lot 17, Block 8, Brookview Heights 1st Addition, distant 30 feet Westerly of the Northeast corner of said Lot 17; thence Southerly and Southeasterly, parallel to and 30 feet from the Westerly and Southwesterly lines of Ridgeview Drive and Abercrombie Drive to the point of beginning.” I , Block 6, Brookview Heights Second Addition, distant 50 feet Southwesterly of the GRETCHEN S. ALDEN Village Clerk I , aye; Fronk, aye; Tupa, Village Clerk Elr. Zikan then presented plans and specifications $6~1 the proposed Brookview Heights Storm Sewer, and Bredesen offered the foUowing Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PIXbIS ALUD SmCIE’ICBTZONS FOR PROPOSED STORM SBJER D@ROVENEXT, AND €jJRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS I BE IT RESOLVXI by the Village Council of the Village of Edina: 1, The plans and specifications for the proposed Storm Sewer Improvement set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the Village Engineer and now on file in the office of the Village Clerk .we hereby approved. 2. Courier and the Construction Bulletin the following notice gor bids for said impr oveme nt : The Clerk shall cause to be published twice in the Edina-Morningside ADVERT1SE”T FOR BIDS STORN SBER NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that sealed bids will be received and opened in the office of the Village Manager in the Edina Village Hall, @Ol W. 9th St., at 1O:OO A.M., Monday, October 22, 1956, for the following improvement: CONSTRUCTION OF BILLAGE :STOEOf .’-I SElfEB AND APPURTENANCES IN: Everett Place, from Nine-Nile Creek to Duggan Plaza; Duggan Plaza from Everett Place to Du-ggan Plaza Circle; Tifton Drive from Everett Place to Ridgeview Drive. The Edina Village Council will meet at 7:30 P.Me, on Monday, October 22, 1956, to consider said bids. lob ./56 Vork must be done as described in the plans and specifications on file in Plans and specifications are available for a 302 the office of the Village Clerk. deposit of $10.00, which deposit will be ref'unded upon return of said plans and specifications, No bids 1~3.1 be considered unless sealed and filed with under- signed before 1O:OO A.I1., October 22, 1956, accompanied by cash deposit, bid bond or certified check payable to the Village Clerk in amount of at least Len percent of amount of base bid, The Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids, BY ORDER OF THE VILZAGE CWTJCIL. GRFTCHEN S. ALDEX Village Clerk 3. Each and aJl of *e terms of the foregoing advertisement for bids are hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of award of the contract for said hpm -rem nt . Hotion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no naTys, as follows: Bank, edesen, aye; Fronk, axe; Tupa, aye; and Erickson, aye; and the Resoluti PROPOSEXI MATIZRJI.WN E4PIiOVFZENT FOR NCR5WNDALE SECOND ADDDION, Engineer Zikan presented plans for a comprehensive watermain improvement in Nomandale Second Addition, explaining that there are scattered petitions for watermain in blocks throughout this area but not for benefit of 51% of the properties as yet; that he feels it more economical. in the long run to install main in the entire area; that scattered areas cannot be served without setting up a trunk district. Bredesen movedthat Council schedule Public Hearing on proposed improvement at the Village Engineer's earliest possible convenimce; that publicity be had on this proposed hpmvement, in addition..to the usual notice of hearing, Motion seconded by Tupa and carried. PROPOSED NINE-I~ELF, CREFX TRUNK SEI.IER, AND AUXILIARY TRUNK FOR SOUTH POX'ION OF VfI;LAGE, Engineer Zikan presented tentative plan for the much-discussed proposed Nine-Nile Creek Trunk Sewer, which is proposed to begin at County Road No. 18 and Naloney Avenue, running South from there to Nine-I-Iile Creek, then in a generally meandering South-east direction, along Nine-Nile Creek, to Normandale Road and approximately W.73rd Street, then Easterly, Southerly, Easterly and Northerly to a propdsed Lift Station at approximately Wooddale Ave. extended South, and W,73rd St., then Easterly to the Richfield-Edina Trunk at Xerxes Avenue. particular Trunk Sewer also presented plan for the route of the proposed sewer to serve the exbeme Southwest part of the Village. This, he stated, would begin on County Road No. 18, just South of Highway No. 169, running Southeasterly from there to a point which would be Dakota Trail extended South and W.74th St.I1; then East -to Normandale Road; thence North to approximately W.73rd Street, where it would enter proposed Trunk Sewer No. C-1. No. C-2. Nr. Zikan e-xplained that that portion of proposed Improvment No, C-1 between Normandale Road and Xerxes Avenue is planned to be 2&,lr pipe, in order that No. C-2 may be served by it in the future; that the area to be benefited by C-2 cannot be served in the future unless its Trunk Sewer ties into C-1; that he,feels, therefore, that the C-2 area should pay for its proportionate share of the Lift Station and for the difference in cost between the 2&ll pipe required to serve both proposed trunks and the 21" pipe required to serve only proposed C-1, He explained that the C-2 area is still largely unplatted; that it is difficult to determine whether owners of unplatted properties r.Jill be rKLl_ing to see this trunk constructed now, but he added he feels it vril.3.. be to everyone's advantage to have all the work done at one time; that, should the C-2 area reject construction of a trunk at this time, they should still be assessed their proportionate share of the C-1 24'' pipe and Lift Station because they can never be served unless this provision is made for them. the Council. that there are many, nany easements to be secured if Council should 1 decide to construct either or both sewers, and he recommended that proceedings be initiated as soon as possible on the proposed improvements, so that action can be taken either one way or the other. He reminded Council that it must determine the proportion of the proposed assessment to be paid by unplatted properties, and one formula advocated vas to assess unplatted properties at the rate of 25 lots per acre. service from the proposed C-L Trunk, but Nr. Zikan stated he feels we do not have sufficient flowage space at the Richfield Trunk to comply with Hopkins's request , November 19, 1956, at 7:30 P,f"I., for the purpose of conducting a Public Hearing on the C-2 portion of this proposed Sanitary Sewer Improvement, vas seconded by Fro& and unanimously carried. This is labeled Improvement No. C-1 on the plan, E?. Zikan The latter plan is entitled Improvement . He reminded Trustee Tupa inquired about Hopkinst request for Tupa's motion, that Council schedule Special 14eeting for llondag, Bredesen moved, approving payment of the following Claims, as listed in Pre-List flat rate of $35 per month as mileage, and suggested that his mileage be kept on saving was being effected for the Village by this method but he is agreeable to the other method if the Council so wishes. Tupa then seconded Bredesen's motion and it carried:. . 1 ,J .) No. 19, dated October 8,' Trustee Tupa objected to Mr. Adam Batko's receiving a a tfper-milell basis in the future. Manager Hyde reported he had felt that a General Fund ---- $6,754. 48 FIatemorks Fund--- 807 . 60 TOTAL Sewer Rental Fund I---- $39304.63 Parks Fund ---- 3,545.95 Garbage Fund ----- 140 .OO 25 856 71 Construction Fund- 3,134.25 Liquor Fund -----$iD&e33 FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BANK A DEPOSITORY. First Southdale Bank a depository for Village funds, and Bank offered the follow- ing Resolution and moved its adoption: Discussion was had as to appointing RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORY FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL, BANK BE IT RESOLVED, that FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BANK of Edina. be and hereby is. designated as & official depository for the Public Funds 02 the General iewe; Rental, Garbage Collection, Waterworks, Liquor, Peuriaanent Tmprovement Revolving, Permanent Improvement Revolving Debt .Service, and Improvement Funds of the Village of Edina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, for the balance of the calendar year 1956. Notion for adoption of Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there edesen, aye; Fronk, aye; , Bank then offered the following Resolution and moved it's adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU O??B3w3ND FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BANK RESOLVED, that the Village Council ofthe Village of Edina approve the assignment by its depositorg, FIRST SOUTI$ALE NATIONAL BANK, of the following securities as good and sufficient collateral for the Village of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: US. Serbificate of Indebtedness Series D-l.956 - . 2-5/8% Due 12/1/1956, Dated 12-1-55 ~100,000.00 Motion for adoption of Resolution was sec were five ayes and no nays, as follows: Tupa, aye; and Erickson, aye; and the Reso on Rollcall there , aye; Fronk, aye; ;F&-&k&d illage Clerk And Bank offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption:. SIGNATORY RESOLUTION FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BANK BE IT RESOLVED, that the persons holding office as Mayor, Nayor Pro-Tem, Manager, Engineer, Treasurer and Deputy Treasurer of the Village of Edina be, and they hereby are, authorized to act-for this Village in thetransaction of any banking business with FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BANK (Hereinafter referred to as the bank), such aubhority including authority on behalf of or in the name of the Village from time to time and until written notice to the bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said account, which checks shall be signed by the Mayor or Mayor Pro-Tern, Village Manager or Village Engineer, and Village Treasurer 'or Deputy Treasurer. The bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any check against such account which is signed as above described, whether or not said check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of., any officer or officers of the Village, including the signer or signers of the checks. Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there rickson, aye; and the Resolution was a 3 .-t 4 .. 3.0/8/56 , I- SIGN ORDINANCE-PROPO3EIl ATENDI-ENI' , A proposed Ordinance was submitted and dis- In this connection Trustee Tupa objected to construction \ cussed at sone length. of a sign by SouthddLe, at the corner of 11,70th St, &d Nohandale Road, and Manager Hyde stated he had no choice but to approve the application, in accordance with the present Ordinance. Attorney l?indhorst asked for some time to review this proposed ordinance, and Bredesen moved that proposed Ordinance be referred to Village Attorney Ilindhorst, with instructions to incorporate a section prohibiting outdoor advertising signs along Normandale Road, in accordance with I*, Tupa's suggestion, and to study other provisions of ordinance, was seconded Qy Tupa and carried CROSST@N HIGHWAY REPORT. 3rd, by 14r. L. P. Pederson, County Engheer, replying to his letter of September 13th; the first letter requesting that Council adopt a resolution designating proposed highway as State Aid Road No. 62, in order that County might present Resolution to the state for action in requesting Federal Funds for use on the project; and the second letter reading, in part, as follovs: llAlso, since the County wuld obligate itself to pay the entire cost for %e construction of the Crosstmm Highway and for right of way and construction for State Aid Road No. 18 in the future, the Village of Edina could and should bear the cost for the purchase of right of wqy for the Crosstotm Highway as requested". Goiiig back %-o Hr. Pederson's letter of September 24, it was noted that it stated, tlHaving th2s route designated a State Aid Road by your Council muld have no effect on any division of cost for right of way or construction, which will have to be worked otrt between the County and the Village.11 of the Resolution requested by the County, and Attorney Thdhorst suggested an additional clause setting forth Villagels understanding that adoption of the Resolution does not obligate Village for any specified division of cost for acquisition of right of way, Bank offered Resolution and moved adoption: knager Hyde read letters of September 24th and October Hanager Hyde recommended adoption RESOLUTION ON STATE AID ROAD NO. 62 T.JHEREAS, the County Board of the County of Hennepin did adopt a resolution altering the designation of State Aid Road No. 62, within the corprate limits of the Village of Edina as follows: No. 62 as described in Commissioner of Hightmyrs Order No. 23952, dated September 1, 1954, be altered and extended to read as follows: "Beginning at the intersection of Trunk Highway No. 55 in Section 20, Township 28 Nor-bh, Range 23 Vest, i.lith the extension Easterly of East 5Sth Street in the City of IGnneapolis; thence Westerly along said East- erly extension and said East 58th Street to the intersection with 28th Avenue South in Section 24, Totmship 28 North, Range 24 West; thence Ilesterly and Southwesterly through said Section 24 and Section 23, Tom- ship 28 North, Range 24 West to the intersection with 12th Avenue South and East 62nd Street; thence Westerly along East 62nd Street and exken- sions thereof to the intersection 76th said 62nd Street and Xerxes Avenue South at the j$ corner between Sections 20 ad 29, Township 28 North, Fknge Ur. Vest; thence 1lesterl;y on the extension of Vest 62nd Street a distance of 179.U feet; thence deflecting to the left along a 4 degzee curve (delta angle r3. degrees 45 minutes and tangent distance 546.26 feet) a distance of 1043.75 feet; thence along tangent to last mentioned curve a distance of 1049.0 feet; thence deflecting to the right along a 4 degree curve (delta angle 538.6 feet) a distance of 1030.3 feet; thence along tangent to last mentioned curve a distance of 3000,65 feet; thence deflecting to the right along a 4 degree 30 minute curve (delta ande 29 degrees 55 minutes and tangent distance 340.24 feet) a distance of 664.81 feet; thence along tangent to last mentioned curve a distance of 1463.46 feet; thence de- flecting to the left along a 4 degree curve (delta angle 30 degrees 48 minutes and tangent distance 394.63 feet) a distance of 770 feet; thence along tangent to last mentioned curve to the intersection with County Road No. 39 in the North $j of Section 4, Township U6 North, Ranfe 21 Ilest, Sections 4, 5, and 6, Tor;nship 116 North, Range 21 Vest, to the inter- section wLth County Road No. 62 on the line between 1-iinnetonka and Eden Prairie Townships; thence continuing Westerly along the line between Ennetonka and Eden Prairie Townships to the intersection with the proposed U, S, outer Belt Line Highmy and there terminating. BE IT RESOLVED, that the present designation of State Aid Eoad degrees 13 minutes and tangent distance Thence continuing in a IIesterly direction across the North 2 of NOX, THZREFOA%, be it resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that said resolution as it affects the Village of Edina, is in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that by agreeing to the foregoing this Council is not agreeing to any specified division of cost for said State Aid Road No.62, Eotion for adoption of the Resolution was were five ayes and no nays, as follows: B esen, aye; Fronk, aye; Tupa, aye; and Erickson, aye; and the Reso W" T: pa, and on Rollcall there F&//&d Village Clerk f3P5 1 10/8/56 PROPOSXD COUNTY PARK PROGRAN, Park and Recreation Director French to vote in favor of a Resolution to be presented to the meeting, Friday, of the League of Rural. Hennepin County Municipalities, in favor of proceeding with proposed ltCounty Park" program. Authority informally granted. EIZCTION OFFICIALS FOR GEI\IERAL=VILUGE EI;ECTION TO BE HELD NOVEEEBR 6, 1956. Clerk presented following list of Election Officials for the Election to be held November 6, and Bredesen moved that roster be approved and that Clerk be authorized to make such substitutions and additions as are needed to complete. Tupa and carried. Clerks, Nines. Seth Iqitts and Roy Drake, 14cCall. Ethel Parker. Mmes a Edith Waste, and Elizabeth IC. Covnick. Ballot Clerks, Nnes. Ann Fiedler and Mn. R. McKaig. Clerks, Nmes. Carl Vieth and Orville Hint5. Ballot Clerks, Bines. W, A, Ryan and Roger Taney. Clerks, lhes. Gladys Cameron and Flora 14. Berkmoes. Peterson. Fmes. E. W. Spencer and E. L, Nodlin. Clerks, Mmes. Vernon Calauson and Norman .Johnson. Clerks, hes. Elmer Soderberg and Vergil Edwards. Norford. Hagen. Stnong, Clerks, Ymes Allen Ode11 and Wm. A. Green. C, Bailey. Nargaret Quist. Clerks, lhes. E, W. Blanch and James Hetland. Ballot Clerks, lhes. Irene Bach and Ruby Schroeder. DIST3ICT NO. 12- Judges, Nmes. Eleanor Oren, Mildred L, Bagley and Hilda R, Sievertson, Clerks, Nmes. Clarice A, Hollingsworbh and Kenneth Hyde. Ballot Judge, 14~s. &rie Kane. Attorney Windhorst advocated the Council' s authorizing Motion seconded by DISTRICT NO. 1 - Zudges, Mmes. L, Dyregrov, Harry A, Perlich and Adelaide CZu5.m. DISTRICT NO. 2 - Judges, Mtnes. Marjorie S. Rossiter, Howard L. Scott and Max W, Ballot Judge, lks. Frances Ashley. Clerks, Nmes. Erle Tornstrom and Orville F. Lawson. Ballot Judge, lfm. Ballot Clerks, Miues. George Church and W. W. Feidt. DISTRICT NO. 3 - Judges, Mmes Ida L, Smith, Ruth 14, Zipoy, and Ruth Volk. Clerks, Ballot Judge, lilrs . Phillip Havrthorne. DISTRICT NO. 4 - Judges, Ymes. Florence Hallberg, Frank Sweeney and Alice Twite, Ballot Judge, IJIrs. Lamence Berglund. DISTRICT NO. 5 - Judges, Mmes. D,W, Amundson, Frances Wood and GOT, Kesler, DISTRICT NO. 6 - Judges, Ymes. 0, M. Bye, Roy M$hr and LeFris E. Jones. Clerks, DISTRICT NO, 7 - Judges, Mines. Nellie Strate, Glenn Hsl1 and R. Sonnenberg. Ballot Clerks, lvlmes , Adolph S chreiber and Donald Doolittle, DISTRICT ItTO. 8 - Judges, Eines. Bertha McCraney, Patricia Salisbury and Susan Ballot Judge, &so Atley 5. Ballot Clerks, Nnes. Paul Gunderson and Dorothy Norgren. Ballot Judge, IJ~s, K, $1. Nakala. Ballot Ballo-b Judge, 141%. Christine Clerks, Ikes . Carl Wakt chow and David Platter. Ballot Judge, P4rs . Geo. DISTRICT NO. 9 - Judges, Mines. Camille Kortum, Ethel S. Link and Herbert Brand, DISTRICT NO.' 10- Judges, Enes. Peter Henningsen, &bel 11. Ifillson and Marian Ballot Judge, Mrs. Frank J. Tupa. Clerks, 3hes . Nabel Zeimes and A. E. Stiff. Ballot Judge, l\.lrs . Ballot Clerk, Mrs. Wm, Dahlke. DISTRICT NO. ll- Judges, Eines. Hazel C, Swanson, R,G. B ennett, Earl Halvorson. Ballot Judge, 14rs. Harry Zirmneman. - RECESS was called for tmty minutes at the request of Mayor Erickson, and Council recessed to conference room at 11:lO P.M. A% U:3O P,IG Meeting was reconvened, with all members present, Bank moved for adjournment of meeting to IJednesday, October LO, at 7:30 P.11, Motion seconded by Tupa and carried.