Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19581222_regularMINUTES VILLAGE AT 7:OO 43 1 12/22/58 OF THE REGULAR MEETfNG OF THE EDI" COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY, DECEMBER 22, 1958, P.M.7 AT THE EDINA VILLAGE HALL Members answering Rollcall were Bank, Dickson, Kohler, Tupa and Bredesen. MINUTES AMENDED AND APPROVED. of December 8, 1958 be amended as follows: That the "RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF $300,000 TEMPORARY IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES B", as recorded on Pages 39 and 40 of Minute Book No. 22, be amended to show Paragraph 4 as reading "The bonds of said series shall be forthwith prepared for execution under the direction of the Village clerk and executed on behalf of the Village by the manual signature of the Mayor---", was seconded by Dickson and carried. Dickson then moved that the Minutes of November 24, 1958 be approved as submitted and that the amended Minutes of the Meeting of December 8, 1958 be approved. Motion seconded by Bank and carried. Bank's motion, that Minutes of the Regular Meeting "HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS" AMENDMENT TO REGIONAL SHOPPING DISTRICT SECTION OF ZONING ORDINANCE - CONTINUATION OF DECEMBER 8TH PUBLIC HEARING. Mr. Robert crabb of Southdale Realty Company reviewed for the Council and the audience the Company's reasons for requesting change in "setback" and "height" provisions of the ordinance--that the change in the "setback" provision will allow the placing of a building closer to France Avenue than is now permitted; and that the requested change in 'the. 4-'heighttf provision would, of course, provide for taller buildings than are now permitted (present ordinance provides a 70-f oot masimum, whereas change would provide for 109-foot maximum height). the change in the setback provision will not affect the setback from Valley View Road. He stated that the request for relief from the "height" provision had been made pursuant to experience with the medical building, which showed that con- struction of this type of building less than six stories high would not be economically sound--but that the Company is willing to delay this part of its request until further studies have been made on the matter of structural economics insofar as office buildings are concerned. Messrs. J.C. Armstrong, 6624 Southdale Road, and Warren A. Sturm, 6713 Southdale Road, led a delegation of about twenty Southdale residents protesting the "height" change. They stated that although they knew the property was zoned "Regional Shopping District" when they purchased their residential properties, most of them believed the maximum height was 40 feet; that they feel their properties will be devaluated if the proposed change is effected; that the view from their residences will be impaired by the construction of "skyscrapers". making no objection to the proposed "s&tback" change. the "control" provision of the ordinance be changed, to provide that "written consent of 3/4 of the owners of property located within 500 feet" be required for construction higher than 40 feet. original ordinance was written the Company owned both the Regional Shopping District and the residential property for blocks around; that, should the ordinance be changed now, provision could still be circumvented by division of ownership into "subsidiary" companies. Trustee Bank suggested that the height limitation be placed at 75 feet, which would permit the erection of a six-story building without further discussion before the Council, but Messrs. Armstrong and Sturm were adamant in their protest against any change in the height provision. They stated they would be willing and happy to discuss the matter with the Company at such time as survey might show construction of less than six stories to be impractical. contain the clause contained in the original ordinance, proh5biting lie9ng quarters above the office buildings. moving that Council dispense with second reading and adopt Ordinance as sub- mitted: ORDINANCE NO. 261-39 Mr. Crabb pointed out that They expressed themselves as Delegation requested that It was pointed out that at the time the They also asked that the proposed amendment Tupa offered the following Ordinance, AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE HEIGHT OF BUILDING IN THE REGIONAL SHOPPING DISTRICT, AND AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph (b) of paragraph 3 of Section 8 (Regional Shopping Distrmdinance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village, as-,amended, is hereby .amended to read as follows: No building shall be erected to a height greater than 40 feet above the average surrounding ground level, except that a building may be erected to a height no greater than 70 feet if the following conditions are observed: "(b) Heiqht of Buildinqs. (1) That for each foot of height above the average surrounding ground level, one foot of street set-back is provided. That the building or portion of the building greater than 40 feet in height is not less than 250 feet from the centerline of any public street dividing the building site from an area zoned either Open Development District or Multiple Residence District. (2) 12/22/58 (3) That the owner of the property on which a building or a portion of a building is proposed to be erected to a height greater than 40 feet first obtains the mitten consent of the owners of 3/4 of the property located within 500 feet in all directions from any portion of the building proposed to be erected to a height greater than 40 feet. No portion of any building more than 40 feet above the surrounding ground level shall be used for dwelling purposes. 44 Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage .and publication. Motion for waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance as submitted was seconded by Dickson, and on Rollcall follows: Bank, aye; Dickson, aye; and the Resolution was adopted. Mayor dillage Clerk MORTUARY - PUBLIC HEARIWG ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO ALLOW. This Public Hearing was conducted on proposed amendment to the Village Zoning Ordinance, to allow a mortuary at Lots 15,16,17,18,19 and 20 and the South 15 Ft. of Lot 14, Block 1, Brookside Heights (5108-5118 Highway #169, otherwise known as 5105-5119 Hankerson Avenue), pursuant to a request for this land useage by Messrs. Dick Enroth and Marv. Rosene. Clerk presented Affidavits of Publication in Edina-' Morningside Courier December 11 and 18, 1958, and of Posting on December 9, 1958, of "Notice of Hearing"; which affidavits were approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Messrs. Maurice Hessian and Dick Enroth presented the case for the mortuary to a delegation of some 30 neighboring residents and the Council. Mr. Enroth showed sketches of the front and rear views of the proposed building, the rear view, which can be seen from Hankerson Avenue, to be treated the same as the front of the building, in brick and glass; the building to be 120x50', to be located on Lots 17 and 18, on a tract some 350 feet wide on Hankerson by 327 feet on Highway #169; to face Highway No. 169. He explained that the idea for the business originated with the petitioners; that they will own the building and lease to Welander-Quist on long-term lease; that the rear of the property will be screened by either a wall or plantings; that the service drive and the parking lots will accommodate sufficient vehicles so that there will be no need for parking on Hankerson Avenue; that processions will follow #169 and not be routed on Hankerson; that there will be an "emergency only" exit onto Hankerson Avenue; that a hearse will never be parked on the premises except immediately before a service. Asked what proportion of the cars attendant at funeral or visitation would be accommodated by parking lots, Mr. Enroth explained that the lots will accommodate at least 60 vehicles, whereas lessee has asked for space for 25 to 35 cars. To a question as to the feasibility of starting a procession along #169, PAr. Enroth replied that special deputies are usgally employed to direct traffic. Mr. Mathieu objected to this operation on the grounds that there will be parking on Hankerson and that it is depressing to look out over a funeral. was directed to the Council, about prohibiting parking on the east side of Hankerson, and Mr. Bredesen replied that, at least, "NO Chapel Parking" could be established. 1,k. Enroth stated there would be no objection to this on the part of the petitioners. he has been delegated to speak for his neighbors on Hankerson; that their objections are complete, unequivocal and violent; that they have been unable to secure any information on this matter until this evening; that, because of Christmas, some of his neighbors could not be here tonight. some of Mr. Enroth's arguments good; that he believes some of his neighbors would feel considerably better about the project if they were better informed. that the Council delay action for 30 days, to give his neighbors time to investigate the project further, It was pointed out to P4r. Gislason that his neighbors have had their Notice of Hearing for over a week; that the Council has considered uses for this property for some years, many of which requests have been denied before even coming to public hearing because they were considered to be not in the public interest; that many of the neighbors are here this evening; that the Planning Commission has recommended favorably on this request. feels that Council should act tonight, o e way or the other. Mr. Morris Nash, 5124 Hankerson, who had previously questioned traffic problems, stated that property owners would like to protect their values as much as they can; that they realize some commercial use must be made of the property, but that there are other uses which would be more agreeable. asked that Council protect residence properties by delaying action until final building plans are presented, showing both treatment of exterior of building, and treatment of screening. not enter into plans for screening; that the type installed will be the type which will best do the job; that the building is proposed to be brick. Bank offered the following Ordinance and moved its adoption: I A question . Mr. R. VJ. Gislason, 5024 Hankerson Avenue, stating that Kw. Gislason stated that he considers He asked Mayor Bredesen stated he Mr. Gislason had presented a petition, signed by ovmers/g g me 44 neighboring properties, objecting. !Ar. Mark J. Dougall, 5116 William, To this Mr. Enroth replied that the cost factor will 12/22/58 45 ORDINANCE NO. 261-40 TL AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF EDINA BY PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL PERMITS FOR FUNERAL CHAPELS, AND BY CHANGING THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH ALL SPECIAL PERMITS SHALL REMAIN IN FORCE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph 4 of Section 11 (Special Permits for Particular Uses) of Ordinance No, 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village of Edina is hereby amended by adding thereto the followins: I Use Chapel - 5. Funeral (1) (3) (5) Minimum Required Conditions Districts Community Store, Commercial, At least one off-street parking space provided on the premises for each five chapel and visitation room seats. Regional Shopping All off-street parking areas to be screened by either fencing or plantings. Location and design of all access drives to be approved by the Village Engineer. All drives and off-street parking facili- ties to be paved with an all-weather surface, and the drainage thereof to be approved by the Village Engineer so as to prevent,overflowing of streets and public places. , No structure to be located closer than 50 feet to any property zoned for resi- dential use or occupied by a one-family, two-family or multiple-family dwelling. All signs to be attached to the structure and not to protrude more than 6 inches from the face of the building, no signs to be placed above the eave line of a structure . Section 2. "5. Paragraph 5 of said Section 11 of said Ordinance No. 261 is hereby amended to read as follows: to which the permit applies are used and occupied for the use stated in such permit. and not resumed within a year after the date of abandonment." cation*according to law. All special permits shall remain in force only as long as the premises A special permit shall become void if such use or occupancy is abandoned Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publi- Motion for adoption of the Ordinah6e.as-submittedy with waiver of second reading, was seconded by Dickson, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as follows: Bank, aye; Dickson, aye; Kohler, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and the Ordinance was adopted. 7 Bank then offered the following Ordinance, moving that Council dispense with second reading and adopt Ordinance as submitted: ORDINANCE NO. 261-41 k AN ORDINADJCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF EDINA BY. ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL .. COMMUNITY 'STORE DISTRICT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6, Community Store-District, of Ordinance No. 261 of the Revised Ordinances of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding at the end of paragraph 1 of said Section 6 an additional sub- paragraph as follows: "(ii) The South Fifteen (15) Feet of Lot Fourteen and all of Lots Fifteen, Sixteen, Eighteen, Nineteen and Twenty, Block One, Brookside Heights Addition." Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publi- cation according to law. Motion for waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance as submitted was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there were four ayes and one nay as follows: Bank, aye; Dickson, aye; Kohler, nay; Tupa, aye;,aqd Bredesen, aye; and the Ordinance was adopted, Mayor Village Clerk 46 12/22/58 Bank then moved for the granting of Special Permit for Mortuary to be located at Lots 15 through 20 and S. 15 Ft. of Lot 14, Block 1, Brookside Heights Addition, (5108-5118 Hr.jy.lfl69, otherwise known as 5109-5119 Hankerson Ave. ) . seconded by Dickson and carried, with Kohler voting no. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSAL FOR PERMIT FOR DOUBLE BURGALOYJS ON VALLEY VIElrJ ROAD BETWEEN W.62VD AND W.64TH STREETS. Affidavits of hblication and Posting of "Notice of Public Hearing" were submitted, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. of a recommendation by the Planning Commission for granting of permission to construct double bungalOVJs facing Valley View Road between W.62nd and yj.64th streets (several lots along the streetrhaving already been granted permits). Messrs Linnell and Ahnert were present at the hearing, and questioned the Council as to location of proposed permits and as to minimum lot size for the proposed doubles, but no objections were made to the proposal from the floor, and none had been received prior to the Hearing. Council grant permits for construction of double bungalows on the following lots and tracts of land, subject to favorable review of construction plans by the Planning Commission, was seconded by Tupa and carried: Motion was . c Mayor Bredesen explained that this Hearing is being held as the result Dickson's motion, that the Lots 4,5,6, and Lots 14 to 22 inclusive, Block 2, Peacedale Acres Lot 1, Ahnert's Addition (4232 Valley View Road) That part of Parcel 5800, Section 30, ~tvp. 28, Range 24, lying South of Valley View Road (4300 Valley View Road) That triangular portion of said Parcel 5800 bounded by I"J.62nd Street, Valley View Road and Brookview Avenue (4301 Valley View Road). (4237,4233 and 4229; 4220, 4224, 4228, 4236, 4240, 4241, 4245 and 4249 Valley View Road) OUTLOT ONE. LYLE FIRST ADDITION--EXCHANGE OF DEEDS APPROVED, Village Attorney Hasselquist explained that developer Lyle Otto has had trouble giving clear title to his "Lyle First Addition" because he has deeded Outlot One (a strip of land to be used for street purposes) to the Village without reservation, an'exchange of deeds, whereby the Village will deed back to Mr. Otto "Outlot l", and he will immediately tender the deed to the Village containing the "street purposestf provision. He recommended ASPHALT EJIIXER CONTRACT AYJARDED. today, on the Asphalt Mixer; bid being that of Road Machinery and Supplies Coo, filinneapolis, for a McConnaughay Model HTO-4T; said equipment to be sold with either a butane burner or a kerosene burner. Considerable discussion was had on the safety factor, Manager Hyde recommended award of contract to the only bidder; and Dickson moved that bid of Road Machinery and Supplies Company, amount $1,675.00, be accepted, with understanding that kerosene burner is to be tried with this equipment. Manager Hyde reported receipt of only one bid Motion seconded by Kohler and carried. GRADER CONTRACT A?IARDED. Const. Equip. Co., at $23,474.00 for a Huber-piarco 6-D2, less trade-in of $7,500 on Village Caterpillar Mo. 12 of 1940, for net bid of $15,974.00. $16,892.00. Kohler and carried. Manager Hyde recommended award of contract to H.C. Ormes Next net bid was Tupa's motion for award as recommended by Manager was seconded by STREET VACATION HEARIKG SCHEDULED FOR JANUARY 26. appeared before the Council to present the petition of Dr. and hks. Harold F. Wahlquist for vacation of that part of Halifax Avenue originally dedicated for a turn-around, and adjoining Lot 5, Southridge. Engineer Zikan showed plat of this turn-around, recommending that Council vacate that part of the turn-around outside the regular width street, and adjoining Lots 4,5,6, and 7, Southridge. Attorney Hasselquist reminded Council that, by its action of November 10cit has already signified its willingness for vacation; but that because of a state statute requiring a public hearing the Council must schedule a public hearing before. formal action is taken. Kohler's motion, scheduling public hearing for January 12, was seconded by Dickson and carried. +WE+ Later in the evening it was ascertained that because of the Courier's deadline's having been set ahead for the holidays, proper legal publication could not be had for the hearing, and it was re-scheduled for January 26, by common consent of Council. RESOLUTION ORDERING SANITARY SE!!JER IlVIPROVEMENT NO. 153 AA4ENDED. LAttorney Hasselquist offered for Council consideration a resolution, clarifying the resolution adopted by the Council on September 8, ordering Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 153. Dickson offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: Attorney Nat I'J. Johnson t RESOLUTIOIT AMENDING RESOLUTION ACOPTED SEPTEMBER 8 , 1958 , ENTITLED "RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEENTS - SANITARY SEVER IIWROVEhlEJT NO. 153 AND WATERMAIN IhlPROVBENT NO. 133" BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that that portion of the resolution adopted by this Council on September 8, 1958, entitled "Resolution Ordering Improvements - Sanitary Sewer Improvement 140- 153 and Watermain Improvement No. 133", which designates the area to be specially assessed 47 12/22/58, for sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 153 as "all lots and tracts of land abutting on the street proposed to be improved", be amended to read as follows: Lots 48 and 49, Auditor's Subdivision No. 176; Lot -1, Block 4, Grandview Heights; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Brookside Heights; Lots 1 through 5, Block 2, Brookside Heights; Parcels 1800, 20d.0, 2205 and 2215, all in Section 28, Township 117, Range 21. and that the remainder of said resolution of September 8, 1958, is hereby ratified and confirmed. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Kohler, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as f aye; Tupa, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and the R * ATTk/Q&* ,L. pillage clerk PURCHASE OF JUDICIAL ROBE QUESTIONED. Judge Burris' notification to the Council of purchase of a $90.00 judicial robe met with questions by the council, inasmuch as there had been no requisition to central purchasing therefor. motion that claim be referred back to Judge Burris, with information that all purchases must be requisitioned through the general office, was seconded by Kohler and carried. Tupa's 'SANITARY SnnJER IMPROVEMENT NO. 146 - SPECIAL TREATMENT THROUGH EASEMENT PERMITTED. Engineer Zikan informed the Council that the contractor has agreed, for an extra cost of $2,000, to jack a pipe from the street, through the Dobbelman-Shuler sanitary sewer easement to the back yards of these properties and then to lay the sewer line inside this pipe; that he recommends this work because the frost is now so deep that the contractor will find it impossible to stay within the easement with regular type of digging and, should the easement line be exceeded the Village will be liable for damages. seconded by Dickson and carried. Tupa's motion, authorizing this extra work, was WATERWORKS REVENUE BONDS SALE APPROVED. Pursuant to direction at last Council Meeting, Manager Hyde presented a plat of the Village, showing watermain "deadends" and plans to loop them. He informed the Council that it may be possible to make assessment against abutting properties for some of the cost of construction, but that most of it should be borne by the waterworks fund, for the reason that most abutting property is non-benefited. Mr. Hyde's preliminary estimate of cost of construction was $47,666.50. It was noted that these plans did not include the looping of the dead end main at Sunnyside Road--which is probably the most troublesome one in the Village--but Mr. Hyde explained that this is difficult to do because the next nearest main is some distance down Highway No. 100 and construction would be unusually expensive. At the direction of the Council, however, he will investigate this cost further. Manager Hyde advocated that Council sell $275,000 of Waterworks Revenue Bonds to finance the proposed main construction and that portion of the Reservoir which the Council has already determined to finance by bond issue. bonds will be 17-year (rather than 15-year) bonds. authorize the sale of $275,000 of Waterworks Revenue Bonds on the 26th of January, 1959, was seconded by Dickson and unanimously carried. EDINA-COU"Y-HOPKINS JOINT STORM SOPdER HEARING POSTPONED. Manager Hyde recommended postponement of this Hearing, scheduled for January 12. Because Grandview Cemetery is located in this drainage district and is non-assessableJ the cost will be very high; that Council must determine a method of paying for the improvement. He suggested that proposed public hearing be postponed pending completion of his report on cost figures. seconded by Bank and carried. "REFUND OF BUILDING PERMIT FEES" ORDINANCE ADOPTED. by the Council, Attorney Hasselquist presented a draft of an ordinance to provide for the withholding of a certain amount from refund of building permit fee, upon request for cancellation of permit. Ordinance, moving that Council dispense with second reading and adopt Ordinance as submitted : Finance Director Dalen then reported that Tupa's motion, that Council Dickson's motion accepting Manager's recommendation was Pursuant to previous direction Discussion had, and Bank offered the following ORDINANCE NO. 51A-1 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR REFUND OF FEES PAID FOR BUILDING PERMITS IN CERTAIN CASES, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 51A THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 4 of Ordinance No. 51A of the Village is hereby amended by adding thereto a new subsection (da), reading as follows: Section 1. 12/22/58 Section 303 shall be amended by adding thereto a further 4s "(da) paragraph (c) , reading as follows: by a holder thereof, with proof satisfactory to the Building Official that no construction was undertaken pursuant thereto, he shall re€und to the holder the building permit fee paid under subsection (a) hereof, except that he shall retain and withhold from such refund 5$ of the amount of the fee paid, or the sum of $25.00, whichever is greater. A similar refund shall be made in such cases of any plan-checking fee paid under subsection (b) hereof, except that no refund shall be made if the Village has caused the plans to be checked.". and publication. "(c) Refund of Fees. Upon return of a building permit to the Village Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage Motion for waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance as submitted was seconded by Dickson, and on folloas: Bank, aye; Dickson, and the Ordinance was adopted. MAYOR Dickson then offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AT RETIREMENT FROM VILLAGE COUACIL EVALD C. BANK WHEREAS, Evald c. Bank has completed nearly five years of service to the Village of Edina, two years as elected Village Clerk, and then later graciously accepted an appointment as a Trustee; and WHEREAS, 1.k. Bank, because of other civic and community interests, chose not to be a candidate for re-election; and WHEREAS, the years of Mr. Bank's office saw exceptional growth in the Village of Edina, involving troublesome planning, zoning, construction and financing problems; and VEIEREAS, Ek. Bank's clear-sightedness, ability to weigh all problems without prejudice and in the interests of the progress of the community as a whole, and initiative in taking action, have been instrumental in solving many controversial matters in a just and expeditious manner: Edina that this Council commend Evald C. Bank for his public spirited service to ths citizens of the Village of Edina. Motion €or adoption of Resolution was secon were four ayes and one not voting, as follo k, not voting; Dickson, aye; Kohler, aye; Tupa, aye; and Bredesen, aye ATTE T: EOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of c upa, and on Rollcall there &&HJJU* Village Clerk DOVJNIAG STREET OFFICIALLY DEDICATED.SPursuant to July 28th instructions by the Council, Administrative Asst., George Hite, presented plan for the new Downing Street. plan showed street to be 40 feet wide and to contain an "S" curve. Dr. Swendseen, representing owners of commercial property at the eastern end of the street, objected to the proposed width, asking that right-of-way be dedicated at 50 feet. asked that the street be screened from that part of the property which is intended by the Village to be used a storage dump. hlr. Hite explained that, while it is not imperative that the street be kept at 40 feet, a dedication of 50 feet will cut down Village storage space; that, because this is Village property and, therefore, a boulevard is not needed, traveled roadway could be as wide as 36 feet in a 40-foot right-of-way. dedication of a 50-foot right-of-way. moved its adoption: His He also Some considerable discussion was had, with Council agreeing on Bank offered the following Resolution and RESOLUTION DEDICATING DOIVNIRG STREET a: WHEREAS, the Village of Edina is the owner of the followin described ropert A 50-4ot right:of%yay tKe situated in Hennepin County, State of hqinnesota, to-wit: centerllne of rFjhlch Road, said point being 25 feet South of the Southwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Edenmoor Addition; thence Easterly parallel to and 25 feet Southerly of the South line of said Lot 3 a distance of 80 feet to'a point of'curve to the right, having a radius of 70 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees; thence along the arc of said curve to the right a distance of 109.96 feet to the end of said curve; thence south and tangent to the last described curve a distance of 12.51 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 70 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees; thence along the arce of said curve a distance of 109.96 feet to the end of said curve; thence Easterly to a point on the Easterly line of Edenmoor Addition, said point being 177.51 feet South of the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Block I, Edenmoor Addition, Said point being the termination point of the roadvlay". aescr b K~~a~x~xaa~xn~xann~"~ommencing at a point on the Easterly line of Sherwood as %OFi! 49 12/22/58 and , that said property be hereafter used and dedicated as a public street, that said property as heretofore.described be and is hereby dedicated for public street purposes. WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary and advisable and to be in the public intarest WW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the village Council of the Village of Edina Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as follows: Tupa, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and the Resol ATTE : &dd/W Village Clerk RE-ALLOCATION OF BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS FOR YEAR 1958 APPROVED, Finance Director Dalen presented for council oonstderation a table showing actual expenditures to November 30, 1958, estimate of expenditures for December, 1958, appropriations for year, and recommended transfers. moved its adoption: Tupa offered the following Resolution and I RESOLUTION RE-ALLOCATING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE YEAR 1958 1. It is hereby deemed that certain appropriations made by this Council for the year 1958 are unexpended, unencumbered and not needed; and that their balances be transferred to other appropriations as hereinafter set forth: GENERAL FUND: GENERAL FUND: TRANSFER FROM : TRANSFER TO: General Government: General Government: P1 anning $ 100.00 Administration $1 , 500.00 Finance 400,OO Legal Services 1 , 150.00 As se s s ing 900.00 Protection of Persons & Elections 100.00 Library LOO. 00 Engineering 5,500.00 Property: Protection of Persons & Fire 1,900.00 Propezty : Central Services: Police 300.00 Genes a1 3,000.00 Public Health 150.00 Equipment Operation 3,000.00 civil Defense 200.00 Village Hall 800.00 Animal Control 400.00 Inspec tion 900.00 Miscellaneous & Contingencies : Contingencies 750.00 Settlement of suits 400.00 Capital Outlay-Garage 400.00 Garage 800.00 Power & Small Tools 150.00 $11 , 450.00 Central Services $11 , 450.00 PARK FUND: PARK FUND: TRANSFER FROM: TRANSFER TO: Recreation $ 3,660.00 Supervision and O'head $2,360.00 Maintenance 550.00 $ 3,660.00 Capital Outlay 750.00- $ 3,660.00 2. It is further determined that receipts for Swimming Pool Fees have exceeded the amount estimated to be received by $9,166.00; and that $7,500.00 of this amount be transferred to appropriation for Swimming Pool Operation, for year 1958. Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Dickson, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as follows: Ba aye; and Bredesen, aye; and the Resolution ATT T: W Mayor Village Clerk I .Q&d CLAIMS PAID. Dickson's motion for payment of the following claims, as per Pre-List dated December 22, 1958: General Fund, $60,742.28; Construction Fund, $42,768.10; Park Fund, $7,402.68; waterworks Fund, $52,126.18; Liquor Fund, $101,855.16; Sewer Rental Fund, $513.54; Improvement Funds, $474,049.34; Temporary Im gjy,jement Fund and JSD fil Fund, $320,542.53-- Total, $1,059,999.81; and for Transfer from P irst Series Improvement Fund of $1,857.63 and from 1950 Second Series Improvement Fund, $1,178.09--Total, $3,035,72 to Assessment Refund Account--was seconded by Tupa and carried. Tupa then moved for adjournment. Motion adjourned at 11:io P.M.