HomeMy WebLinkAbout19621008_regular256 10/8/62
?II!JUTES OF THE REGULAR HEETING OF THE
EDIIJA VLLLAGE COU;JCIL,' HELD tIClNDAY,
OCTOBER 8, 1962, AT THE EDIiIA VILLAGE
HALL
'lembers answering Rollcall were Dickson , Eacllillan , Tupa , VanValkenburg and
3redesen.
MINUTES OF bIEETIi4GS of September 24 and October 1, 1962 were approved as submitted,
by motion VanValkenburg, seconded by Dickson and carried.
aommi, GRAIJTS SPECIAL PEWIT FOR GASOLIHE SERVICE STATIO~I AT ~.49-1/2 ST. AND
FRANCE AVEXUE.
of Public Hearing on Petition for Permit for Gasoline Filling Station", which
Affidavits and flotice were approved as to form and orderEd placed on file.
Pursuant to said Ilotice, Public Hearing was called on the Petition of The Stow
Conpany and "obi1 Oil Conpany for a Gasoline Filling Station on the 1Jorthwest
Corner of France Avenue and 1!.49-1/2 Street, extending 135 feet Xorth from !J,59-1/2
Street and 135 feet !!est from France Avenue, on the following described property:
"Tne South 27.5 Feet of Lot 20, all of Lots 21 and 22, and the Jorth 7,5
Feet of Lot 23, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172".
Showing a Vu-Graph Slide of the area under consideration
surrounding area, Planning Director Hite reported the Planning Conmission has
recommended denial of the request for permit, for reasons contained in the Xinutes
of the Seytember 5th Commission Heeting (which, Elr. Hite re?orted had not yet been
approved by the Conmission because they have not met between that date and this).
He also referred Council to the Flanning Conmission Ilinutes of August 8, relative
to -this matter.
Hite reported it krill face France Avenue, is a two-stall service station, rrith
two driveways on France and two on V.49-1/2 Street; that the buildins meats all
design standards, and the layout meets standards in relation to setbacks and
screening,
before on behalf of this petition, asked if Council had raceived a report from
its engineers concerning traffic.
the station will not add to the traffic problem -.,t this corner, but will alleviate
it by creating additional visibility at this corner.
report filed by Chief of Police :!ape 9. 3annett, the substance of which cas th3t
the station operations rrould not have any serious effect on the traffic situation
in t'nis area.
Tlrs. "argsret Johnson, 4913 France Ave. SO.^ presented a petiti.cn signed by
sixteen residents of the Xnneapolis side of France, and Ewing Avenue, objectin2
to ?reposed permit on grounds that 3 filling station wuld "Creatly de2reciate the
value of our ?roperties, and make it a less desirable residential area in dnich to
live"; and a like petition v:.:as filed by thirteen residents of-the 4300-Prance znd
3900-:F. 49th St. blocks.
permit for Silling station, asking for &zoning to Connunity Store of fifteen feet
inmediately to the 14orth of the presently zoned tract, and extension of the gasoline
filling station permit to contain this Fifteen feet
property under consideration is already zoned "Community Stare"; that there rrill b3
a ccmmercial operation on this cornw, 6netlier it is a gasoline statio3 or not, and
that therefore the reason given in their objecting petitions is con?letely non-
a?plicable to the matter.
if this permit is granted, the oetitioners would immediately apply for multiple dvelling
zoning for the North part of the property (abutting !J.49th St,); and bfr. aril1 re?lied
that petitioners expect to apply for an apartment house on this corner, so that the
people on the Edina side will be effectively screened frcn the easoline station.
the premise that a gasoline filling station is not more detrimental to an adjoining
residential neighborhood than other uses of the Community Store District; that there
are other criteria to be considered (besides traffic considerations), such as the
keeping of flammable liquids, the intense lightinz, late hours of operation, etc.,
which must be considered by the Council in detemininz this.
Saying he feels that in view of the legal decision; arid'the report of the
Chief of Police relative to traffic, he feels the Council has little choise but to
issue the permit, Trustee Dickson moved that Permit for Gasoline Filling Station be
granted.
only mean expenditure of Village funds uith the high probability of having Council's
decision reversed by the Courts, although he, personally, feels that there are other
Cornnunity Store uses which Would be less objectionable to the neighborins residential
properties.
Clerk presented Affidavit of Publication and Hailing of llilotice
together with the
Presenting a sketch of the site plan of the proposed station, I?r.
:Ir. Josiah Brill, representing petitioners, reminding Council he had qoken
He stated it is petitioners' petition that
llayor 3redesen revieved I
3. ;lite re?orted that an arnended petition has bein made by qetitioners for
iIr. aril1 asked that objecting petitioners be clearly inforned that the
ifayor Bredesen asked fclr 3 confirmation of :Ir. 3rill's statenent to him that
Mr. Hite reported that the Planning Commission and Nr, Brill do not agree on
Xayor Bredesen stated he, too, feels .that to fight the permit would
'
Trustee Tupa secohded Dickson's motion, and it carried,
10/8/62
ADDITIOX4L - ._. . FIVE-FOOT . _- . DEDICAT1Oi.J FOR STREET TlIDENIilG AT :I. 49-1/2 ST. AXD FR/U?CE ..) TEiKIL WF~;F!XED 1% PLAIlrIi.JG COllMISSION , TOGmlI !lm-l XEqUEST FO3 REZOilIilG OF
ADDITIONAL 15 FEET TO, IIORTH OF PRESEXT ZOIIIIilG.
KGasoli-e Station Permit, asked once aaain concernin2 Council's opinion
on petitioners' offer to dedicate five feet for the widening of !1,49-1/2 Street,
Manager Hyde said he thought this dedication would be of little value; that it
certain1:y should not be accepted with petitioners' stiwlation that they be
relieved of any assessment for the worK of wideniug the street. Mr, Stow told
Council he feels that a five-foot extension would help the flow of traffic
considerably; and Ilr. Brill added that Tlr, Stow has novr consented to grant this
five feet without stipulation for alleviation OF assessment,
matter of widening W,49-1/2 Street by five feet at this corner be referred back to
the Planning Conmission for study and recommend3tion3 togethsr with the request
for tlis Zoninz to Co.nmunity Store of an additional flfteen feet to the Xorth os'
the ?resently zoned Froperty, and extension of the Gasoline Service Station
permit to contain this fifteen feet.
Yr. 2rill$ representing petitioners
Tup moved that the
I tlotion seconded by Dickson 2nd carried.
TJATCPnlAiI AVEIIUE STP.EET ITIPROVEtu5EZJT ORDERED.
contmfromTeptember 10th and 24th, €or Council investisation as to methods
of assessnent and traffic control, was reconvened by Flayor 3rzdesen,
it is the Pronosed flGradin% and Graveling and Asdialt Concrete PavinZ; of 'latamm
,Avenue Ercm 31ake Road to 813 Feet East".
citi-ncl; th5 JJillage Attorney's opini-on that It rtould be nro?er and mandatnry for
the Council to assess Interlachen Country Club in accordance with the impravenwit
bcneFits to the Club; and recommended that residents be assessed an Estimated
$3.00 Fer front foot, with the Club being assessed for the balmce,
tias azain present to orotest use of the streat by commercial vchicles--semi-~railers,
buses, etc.
aeainst trucks of over four ton axle loads.
the settling of the street after construction of the trunk seuer, Flr, Fralick
inquired as to when it is intended to do the work.
be necessar;r to delay until sprine, in view of the 5cmr construction now under
my; that the Engineers will determine this.
control of sneed; was answered that all possible vi11 be done to control sreed
along this street.
pro?osed assessment, all feeling that ?{re Hyde's recommendation is a fair one;
This Public rIearinn, which had been
Snecifically,
?Iana?er Xyde ?resented a memorandum
m
(23 b a 02
'fr. T'ralick
Tlanager Hyde informed him the Council can ?est the improved street
53 Citing the trouble experienced Erom
Hr. Hgde reprtcd that it m3y
Tlr. rralick then inquired ahout
Council discussed PTanager's recommendation, relative to
(and Tupa moved th3t the Council go on record as establis'aing as a,nethod of
)assessment for t'nis proposed improvement LILG i ollbwing :
(
(Avenue as access to its ?arking lot)
(the actual Total Assessable Cost as $1,658.00 bears to $6,777.00,
(
(An amount which bears the same ratio'to the actual Total Assessable Cost as
($5,119.00 bears to $6,777.00; said amount to be pro-rated to the individual
(properties on a "per front foot" basis. hlotion was seconded by Dickson and
(carried.
(
( RESOLUTION ORDERING IIIPROVENEENT
tllC
Pro9osed Assessment to the Interlachen Country Club (which uses \laterman - An amount w'nich bears tha same ratio to
Proposed Assessments to Residential Properties Abutting I.laterman Avenua - I
Tuna then offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
( STREET INPROVEMENT NO, A-154
3E IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Pfinnesota, that this Council
heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published on the fol1owin.y pronosed
imwovenent :
COWSTTIUCTION '3F GRADING AND GriAVELIHG PiJD ASPHALT COIICRETE PAVIiTG 114
!IAT~RIIAU AlJEMUE FROPi BLAKE ROAD TO 813 FEET EAST
and at the hearinss held at the time and place specified in said notice the Counci.1
has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of
the oertinent facts does hereby determine to Droceed with the construction of said
improvement; that said improvement is hereby desiqnated and shall be referred to in
all subsequent proceedings as STREET IP4PROVEYIENT ;?O. A-154, and the area to be
specially assessed therefor shall include all lots and tracts of land abuttin;: the
street to be improved.
Jlotion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Dickson, and on 2ollcalltherc I
>/ATERXAI? AVEWUE TO BE POSTED AGALIIST HEAVY LOADS.
Avenuerposted to Four-Ton Axle Load as of now.
Tu?a then moved that Xaterman
Potion seconded by Dickson and carried.
13/5/62
SFZCIAL ASSESS?"E;IT H%P.?.I:!GS CO:TDUCTED.
published in Edina-Zorningside Courier September 20 and 27, 1962, Council conducted
Public ifear inrJs on the Eo1lo:rinT nro9osed assesswnts for com?leted fnprovenents ,
and action was taken as hereinafter recorded;
of ;Jotices ;.rere presented by Clerk, approved as to fom and ordered placed on ??le.
SA?JITP,Ff. l'P,U%(\ $,tJE< ii<D: C-1.
at Totalk $5,459.16, proposed to be assessed agarnst 1,629.6 front feet at
$3.35 per front fcot,
levied against properties r.!:ii.ch ars recerving service frcx Lateral Sanitary Scvar
r:ith a connection to San%tary Trunk Sewer ;lo, C-1; that these ?po?srties ?rere on
t'ne boundary of the original district wonoyed tc be assessed, P~o~osal includes
Trovision for assessment to bz spread over 16 years, 1963 throush 1978.
objections were received at the Heariny, and none had been rec5ived rrior thereto,
IEckson's motion for aproval of proposed assessment ;.:as seconded by VanV3lkenbur~
and unanincusly carried,
Confirming fissessnent .I
PL,IJT i40. 175A &iD '.IATSR':241:J I'fPRC)!rE~!Ei?l' IfO. 15214 - In Xorth line of Lct 1, a1QCk 5,
Edina Highlands froxjrshire 31vd, to :lest line or' Lot 6, 3lock 5, Edins iiighlznds.
30th these Inproveqents are to serve the premises at No, 5304 Glenbrae Circle.
Uanager Hyde read tabulations of assesment for these projects as follows:
Sanitary Sewer
Sanitary Sexer Inprovenent !IO, 175); for the'Tktermain - $736.07 (the same cost 2s
that charged to neighboring lots for Watermain Improvement No. 152,
explained that in the case of both improvements the actual construction cost vas
less than that incurred for construction of the Lateral facilities to which this
one lot is connected, but that it is considerzd only fair and equitable to make the
same charge for these servTces as paid by those assessed for the original lzteral
servkes,
prior thereto,
unanimously carried,
Assessment.)
Construction of Concrete Ca and Gutter in Virginia Lane €rm Concord Avenue to
Yirginia Avenue.
against 660.8 feet for $3 ,$4 per Assessable Foot, as conpared with $4.29 as Riven at
Improvement Hearing. '
received prior to the Hearing , flac'.lillan ' s motLon approvinz assessqent as proFosed
was seconded by Tupa and unanimously carried. (See Resolution of later in :.lseting,
AdoDting and eonfirmin? Assessnent),
Construction'of Portland Cen"ent: Concrete Paving and Inteeral Curb in :.T. 70th Street
from fii~h~iay >ioD 100 to France Avenue. Total Assessale Cost was read as $41,476.50,
?reposed to be assessed azainst 8,294.1 Assessable Feet at $5,00 per Foot, this bzing
a standard assessment for streets designated as "State Aid" Streets.
project was $198,066.95, State Aid (Gasoline Tax) Funds Dayin9 the balance.
were no objections froq the audience, and none had been received prior to the Xearing.
VanValkenburg's notion, approvin? assessment as proposed, xas seconded by Dickson and
unani.nously carr ied
Assessment).
5.
Iknager Hyde ex?lainer thrlt the assessment for this St or9 Ses~er ITnwyxewCt has been
divided into t~ro different rates, becausa of the Fact that a napt of the syiste-? hzs
received Stat2 Ald, the Total Cost of th3t wrt of the sy3tem beinz $161,022.35, v~tth
State Aid naying $33,550.99, leavLn3 $127,461.36 proposed to be ass%ssed against
4,059,279 Fssessable Squara Faet, for $.a314 per Square Foot, as ccxP3red with
Improvement Hearing Zstinate of $.038, The cost for thizt ?art 02 the system to
which State kid did not contribute ;.:as $67 ,n73 99 , ?roFcsed to Be assessed 3gsinst
2,362,425 Assessable Squsre Feet, for 5.02845 per Square Foot, as ccrnnwsd \!ith
Inprovement 3earinz Estinate OF s.032. ner Square Foot. There :ras ane ohjec-ticn
from the audience-that Chap1 Hills area should receive credlt for a stcrn se-s'e~
constructed by the developer before.this present project vas conceived; thst ?ro.nise
of this credit had been made at neizhborhood meetinzs en this qroject dian it :ras
propxed.
constructed swer, Planning Diractor Hite bras desnatched to secure them, and Ccuncil
continued this Hearin5 until thq could be secured,
As a matter of infornation, that portion of Storm Sewer In?rove!nent iQc. 60
to which State Aid contributed was as follows: hook Drive frm 9-'.!i. Creek to
3illside Lane; 3rook Driva, to Y.70th St. on Limerick Lane; !!,70th St., Cahill ?d.
to Antrim Pd,; Tracy Ave., !?.70th St. to W.66th St,; KaGuire ?mad, Tracy '4ve. to
Antrim Xd. ; Antrim lid., ':cGuire Rd. to Valley View Fd. ; Valley Vie77 Xd, , Antrim to
425' 3. of Antrim Xd. ; e'napel Dr., Antrim Rd. to II. line of Lot 8, i3lock 4, Chapel
Ilill.
That portion of the system to which State Aid did not contribute is as fol10t:s:
Y.68th St., 9-Xi. Creek to Limerick Lane; Easernent Line from intersection af Ely line
of L.1 an ~~66th St, to Tracy; th* S. on Tracy hve. to Susan; also Galrray Drive frcrn !J,66th St. LO 3rook Drive.
Pursuant to "lfotices of Assessment 3eearin~s"
Affidavits of Publicaticn and :'ailing
1. PUSLIC HE/I.RIXG @2 P?'OPniiED ASSCSS'TEIIT , 3EINC SUFPLE:E~STAL ASSS;SS"TEilT Tr)
'Tabulation OF Assessment vas read by ?Imager ;-1yde,
::anager Hyde eglained that this assesment is nox beinz
20
(Sez ?esolution of later in llastinrj, Adopting and
2. PU3LIC 2EAXIJG 3;? PYOPOSED ASSESSUEiITS rO? SAi?ITARY LATEFAL SE:?EX I!PBV!E- -- -... --. . , , r7.
For -the
$1,753.63 (the same cost as th2t charged to neighborins lots for
blr. Hyde
There :.rere no objections raised at the I-learinz, and none had been received
Tupa's motion aFprovinp7 asssssment was seconded by Dickson and
(Sea Resolution of later in Fleeting, Adapting and Ccnfirrning
3. PUaLLC IIEARIMG ON PROPOSED ASSESSNENT FOR STPSET I?IPROVE!%3T IfO. i3-69--
Total Assessable Cost was read as $2,603.55, proposed to be assessed
There were no objections frcm the floor, and none had been
4 .. PU3LLC HEAYIiTG OiJ PflOPQSED ASSESSENT FOP. STREET IIIP??OVE?-'EiJT HO. E-14-- .
Total Cost of
There
(See Resolution of later in ?feetin%, ,Ado?ting and Confirming
PUBLIC HEA2I:IG @:I PP,?POSED ASSESS'TEHT Fn2 STQVi SE!:ER II:P?.O?Et%i4T 1413, GO,
Fiecause firm fi-Ewes could net be had at the ncnent, on cost oP developer-
(See action of later in :.:cering).
31.1, 3rookvie:.1 Hts. 4th Addn., SVly to ;I.G6tli St, or its extension; th. :?.
10/8/62 259
E, ?USLIC HEARING OM PROPOSED ASSESSFENT FOR. STREET IbIPSOVEFIENT NO, E-9 --' 5
Cons%rL&fon omtland Cement Concrete Raving and Integral Curb in ';.?,69th Sf;',
Antrim Road to VcGuire Rd.; Brook Drive, Y.69th St. to iJ. end of La3uena Vista
Addn. ; McGuire Road, .F1,69th St, to Brook Dr. j Tracy Ave, , W.70th St I to N, end
of LaBuena Vista Addn, ;. Galway Dr, , Spook Dr, to Y.66th St, ; Hillside Lane,
ti.70th St. to !J.66th St.; Limerj-ck Lane, Hillside Lane to !l,66th St,; IJ,68th
St., Antrim 'Rd., to k. 'end of The Heights 3rd Addn,; 5i,66th St,, Valley View
Rd. to E, end of The Heights 3rd Addn,; I4.67th St,, Limerick Lane to E, line
of The Heights 3rd Addn, Blanager Hyde read the Total Assessable Cost as
$263,743.25, proposed to be assessed against 24,557.1 Assessable Feet, for $10.74
per Assessable Foot. He explained that, had the Estimate been fisured on the
full-corner-lot assessment basis, rather than on the method of corner lots
receiving assessment for only 1/3 Tneir side lot footage (in addition-€0 full
front footage) the assessable. cost would have been $9,50 per Assessable Foot.
Estimate given at Improvement Hearing was $9.57 per Assessable Foot,
Reporting that he had had some meetings with a committee appointed by the
neiqhborhood to review the costs relative to the proposed assessment, Kr, i-ldyde
explained that the committee had asked for an explanation of the over-runs an
the contract, He told Council that on Stabilized Base the contract ran over
estimated quantities by about 8,000 Yards at 15$ per yard; that excavation
over-ran estimated quantities by 10,000 Yards, because of poor sub-soil; that
there were over-runs because of intersection chanps and because several
residences were built during construction, Also explaining that there had
been some questions by the committee relative to work orders issued by the
Sillap on this project, Vr, Hyde referred to IJork Order Xo. 2041, in the
amount of $4,399.53, which is for "Creek job on Brook Drive--retaining tiall
and added drainage structures", 'Vr. Hyde reported that while this work tras
done as a part of the paving project, if was actually reinforcenent of bridp
over 9-i.Tile Creek, and should not be charged to this project,
Public liearinz there vias sone considerable discussion as to whether or not
this yrticular charge should be added to assessment for Storm Setter Improve-
ment Tlo, 60--rr'nich proposal. met with objection from !!IT, Ford Detzel, 5809
"kCtuire Road, who inquired as to how such an assessment (for a bridge) could
be justified.
water from this area enters the system at this point,
di-scussed was No, 2041A, 2mount $4,908.41, for "Limei-ick Lane and i-IilLs<.de
inters9ctlon1',
fs a just charge azainsi: this pro2ect, with the balance of $3,187.96 chwzsahle
tc the Park Fund (wi-th $2,000 of this $3,187.96 being .3 credit due this 3rza
For fill from this area used in the Hays Farm Park ?roosrty).
rcyxted that the elimination of tvro charges--$4,399,53 and $3,187 '96, will
reduce the ?reposed assessment to $10,44 per Assessable Foot; and that it
is recommended that the proposed assessment be amended in this manner, He
added that "ha neighborhood committee has inquil-ed as to why a penalty vras
not charged to the contractor ; that in view of the circumstances under M'nich
the contracror operated the Village did not feel that it was justifJed in
exzcting a ?enalty.
.intraduced amther member of the committee, who objected to a contract over-run
n.F ~omd $1,350.00 saying that if Barton Contracting Comyany and the Villase
had pursued the job diligently a great deal of this over-run could have been
eliminated, because a larze nart of the charge is for a street in rdnich a storm
sever was not gut in. He objected to assessment OF the $1,350 against this
?rcrfect; also asked that penalty be imnosed against 3arton for the delay in
ccmpletlon of woject.
assessment on the grounds that the road work has devaluated his pronerty rather
than increased its value, because he has lost a driveway, Plr. Hyde explained
that this is the properti in which underground springs were discovered, and that
in addition to this, there were trees which had to be saved; that the Villaze
has had meetings with tlr, Olson on the matter now under discussion, and has dclne
the best it possibly could under most. unfavorable circumstances,
were received on the matter of contract over-runs, and Yr, Hyde explained that
contracts are awarded on unit prices because it is believed that contractors
biddin:: on the frjob" basis would have to provide so much cushion to protect
themselves the price of the jobs would be coqpletely prohibitive; that award
on "unit" basis is standard practice,
contract price of the three coordinated projects (Storm Sewer Improvement 80, 60
and Street Improvements Nos, E-8 and E-9) was sone $6,000 less than estimate,
flr. Porter, Chairman of the neighborhood committee, asked to be allowed to thank
!IC, Hyde and the other Villqe officials with whom the connittee had met, for the
courtesy and attention given to the committee's requests. He brought a lauzh
when he added, "It was more than we had expected,"
~3s had by the Council concernincr, the two work orders under consideration for
deletion of the assessment. Kayor Bredesen said he believes the bridze order
is more appropriately charged to the Storm Sewer than to the Street Imnrovement;
uhereunon Hr. Hyde suggested that it is difficult to tell whether to charge this
to the area under consideration for assessment now, or to the entire area to the
iIorthr.iest, He added that perhaps the cost should be paid from the Cencral Fund,
I
During the
Hr. Hyde replied that it can be justified on the theory that
Another work order
fpir. Hyde told Council he believes that only $1,720.45 o-F this
ilanager 3yde
Blr. Frank Porter, Chairman of the neighborhood committee,
Mr, R. D, Olson, 6900 Hillside Lane, objected to the
Other questions
He added that, injustification, the
Some considerable discussion
2660 10/8/62
) JS it covers the reinforcinz and bolsterinp, up of that papt of the street over the
Creak.
':r. Kyde reolied in the qf'firmative,
assessment for STREET I!TPXr)VE:IEXT NO. E-9 be amended by deductinp, therefrm :?ark
Order ;To. 1098A in arnount of $4,399.53, and $3,187,96 of York Qrder Ifo. 23411?,
:iiiich mounts are to be paid by General Fund and Park Fund resnectively, and rrhicn
deductions will reduce ths assessnent frc;? $10.74 per Assessable Foot to $10,44 ner
Assessable Foot ; and Dlckson so moved.
(qee 3:esolution a? later in ;kctin?
Asked by I"r. Tuva if this were actu2lly a "re?lace%ent and rapair" job,
It was concensus of Council that the proposed (\
?lot ion seconded ?an?alkenSurz and unaninouslg
(carried.
(
Amendh? Assessment ) *
7IaniZ:er Hyde report& that becmse it is ncw so clcse to the deadline for
certification of assessrnlcnt to tne County Auditor, this amendmnt nqy not ba raflected
in. the first year's assessnent, but that adjustment will be made in the second and
succeeding assessment years.
3l-rlost irncossible to make correction in tine for certifi-cation to Auditor by Pctobsr 10.
SZCElVE C?E:E)IT F3" DE~!ELnTZF-COi:ST~UCC"ED STOP'C SE'IER,,
c&<c' b'f -cn& Stsir; S&;&- construcied by the develclner os' Ciapel ail1 vas $3,250 .00; anti
Council disciissed the request received ear1ierthi.s evenin?, that the Chapel i-lill
woperty owners be .s,iven credit on their proTor;ed assessment for Stom Smar Ho. 63,
for this cast--rr'nich was &sorbed by them in the cost of their lots.
reconmended al1o:rance of this credit to Chap1 IIill lots, ::ith amount of credit to be
aljsorbad by the llReserve for Assessment account. Dicltson's notion, that
woposed assesmlent for STO?!: SE'ICX I'IP3OVET'EiJT 30. 60 be amended to show a crzdit
to C'napel Hill lots for anlount Daid €or Dsveloper-Constructed Storm Sei:ar. Hction
seconded by VanValkenburg and unanimously carried. (See Resolution OF later in
( Once again Ilana.;r,er Hyde reported that it may not be possible to reflect this
anendment in the Cirst year's assessaent (because it is necessary to certifIj assessments
to County Auditor by October 104-but that adjustrnent will be made in the second and
succeedin2 assessnent years, and Council agreed to this arranzement.
Construct2on of- Cement Concrete Favinp, and Integral Curb in '*1,7(3th St, from
Antrim goad to A-nundson's Addn., and in Antrim Road fron ?alley View Iioad to :1,70th St.
iIan7ger Hyde explained that inasmuch as these are "State Aidvr Streets, the Assessakle
Cost is $32,150.00, Droposed to be assessed against 6,430 feet at the standard assessment
of $5.00 ?er Assessable Foot; that the Total Cost of the project was $134,036.27, >:ith
State Aid Funds beino, used for the balance of the cost.
received at the Hearing, and ncne had been received prior thereto.
that proposed Assessment be approved was seconded by Dickson and unanimously carried,
(See following Yesolution Adoptin2 and Confirming Assessment),
Dickson then offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
Council asreed to this arran?ement, inssnuch 3s it is I 5. STOXII SZT?3? I':P?@?E:'U"iJT ;TO, 60 ASSESS:E;IT HEA?I;JC, FZCO.P~E;%I: C;lAPEL HILL TI?
:Ir. Hite reported that the
I'anqer SIgde
.t >eeting, Amending Assessnent).
7. PU3LIC HEARLlC 03 PROPOSED ASSESSWJT FOR STREET IIIFRQVENENT il0, E-8 -
There were no objecrions
Tupa's moticn I
ItESQLUTIGf ADDPTIITG AXD COIIYIR'IIiJG ASSESST'EiJTS
FOX SUPPLE'1E;IT TO SAIJITAXY TRUiIK SCUEEP YO, C-1,
SK?ITARY LATERAL SEVER ;JQ *
TlAIIJ Itil?POVE:IZI?T 140 I 152P,, AlJD STREET IIEPRO?EfIENTS
lTOS. B-69, E-8 , AND E-14: AXD f\I:EiJDIi?G ASSESS'IEiJTS
F3R STOR:I SE'IER IIIPRC!VETEi?T IJO. 60 AilD STEET
1IlPROVEFZE;JT 210. E-9, ADOPTING SAID A'IENDED
175A, LATERAL IJATER-
ASSESSIIE~ITS
3E IT RESOLVED by the Villageruncil of the Village of Edina, t"lnnesota, as follows:
1, It is hereby found, determined and declared that the proposed assassaents for
SUPFLEIE3T TO SNJITAZY TRUX SE'IE!: HQ. C-1, SMITAW LATERAL SEIIE!? 210, 1754, LATERAL
.?OS. 3-69, E-8, E-9 AilD E-14, and each of them, have been calculated in accordance
with the provisions of 'Xnnesota Statutes Sections 429.051 and 429.051; that notice
has been duly published, as required by law, that this Council muld meet to hear and
pass upor! all objections, if any, to anend said pro?osed assessments as night be
necessary, and to ado?t the same by resolution; that s3Lid yoposed assessments hava
at 211times since their filing been open For Fublic ins?eCti.cn, and o??orrunit:l hzs.
been 3iven to all Lnterasted mrson.; to ?resent their objecticns; and that each of the
lots, ?ieces and prcels of land enumerat2d in t5e resqective assessments for SUFPLE'%i:T
TO SKIIT4'XY TRUiIX SET!% ;J3. C-1, SXiITAT LATERAL SZ;!CP, iJ3. 1754, LATER,?L 2ATPPAI:~
1:IFFQVETIXi' 110, 152P., .\;ID STREST I'fPY:(?\'E:IE;JTS ::OS. 3-69, Z-3, KID E-14 :-?as and is
specially benefited by the construction of the improvewnt for vhhich such assessment
is levied in the aqount set oposite the description of each such lot, niece arid
aarcel of land, res?ectively.
It is hereby found, determined and declared that each of the lots, pieces anti
qarcels of land enumerated in the res?zctivo assessnlent .?or STREET Ir*PRni7Er'EiiT J@. E-9
iras and is srecially benefi-ted b;r the cmstructSon of sa55 5mwcvenent in m amunt.
equal to the amount of footaze set o??osite the descriytion of each such lot, $ece and
narcel of land, respstivel:r, multiplied by $10.44; this declaration amendinz rhe
mount of the Fromsed assessment as heretofora calcuhted, by rsduclnq thz arlount of
szid ~rcposed assessrlent as:3inst ewh lot, ?iece and rmcel of lsnd, ros?sctivel::, by
=n mount equ21to the mount of footaze set opposite the descrtwtion of each Such lots
?Lscc and ?arcel of land .?ulTi?lled by $0.30.
?arcels of land enun2ratsd Sn the asscssnent for 5TQYI SC'IE? I'T,py+2\VE'1EiIT UO. 60 K3.S and
:'ATZRI.IAIIJ 1fIPROVETIE:JT :J@. 152A, §TOT1 SEllER 1I~PROVEF:ZXT iJ0, 60, AiTD STREET 1'IFROVE;E~ITS
2.
3. It is hereby r'ounti, detexlined and declared that each of the lots, ?ieces and
10/2/62
specially benefited by the construction of the improvement for vl'nbch such assess-
mnt is levied in the amount set opgosite the descri7tion of each such lot, piece
and parcel of lan8, respectively, EXCEPT that all those lots and tracts: of land in
CHAPEL HILL ADDITIOX, as the sane is filed and of record in the 7iegister of Deeds
Office, IIennepin County, Minnesota, are hereby found, determined and declared to
be benefited in the amount set opposite the description of each such lot, piece
and parcel of land, respectively, LESS an amount 'equal to $3,250.00 divided by
the nuqber of lots, pieces and Yarcels of land in said CIiAPEL HILL ADDITION; this
declaration amending the proposed assessment for STOR?.! SEWER IW?ROVEMENT 140. 60
foln NJLY those lots, pieces and parcels of land contained in said CHA?EL HILL
P,DDITION,
pieces
assessments are hereby adopted and conEiFmed as the proper special assessments for
said improvements, respectively.
together with the interest accruing on'the full amount thereof Eron time to time
unnaid, at the rate of five percent per annum from the date of this resolution,
shall be a lien concurrent with general taxes uDon the property described therein
'and all thereof,
5, The total amount of each such a.ssessment for .SUPPLE!,lE;IJT TO SANITAW
TRUiU SEWER C-1 sahll be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of sixteen years, the first of said installments, to,zether with interest on
the entire assessment from the date hereof to Decembe5.-~31, 1963, to be payable with
general taxes for the year 1962, and one of tha remaining installments, with one
year's interest on that and all subsequent installments, to be payable with general
taxes for the years 1963 through 1977, collectible in the respective ensuing years,
175A, LATERAL i7ATERMAIIJ IElPROVEFlENT NO
shall be payable in equal annual installments extendins over a neriod of ten years,
the first of said installments, together with interest on the entire assessment
from the date hereof to December 31, 1963, to be payable with general taxes for
the year 1962, and one of the rernaininp, installments, with one year's interest on
that and all subsequent installments, to be payable vrith senera1 tases for the years
1963 through 1971, collectible in the respective ensuing yeam.
shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of five years,
the first of said installnents, together with interest on the entire assessment
from the date hereof to December 31, 1963, to be payable rrith general taxes for
the year 1'362, and one 'of the remaining installments, v:tith one year's interest on
that and all subsequent installments, to be r?ayable xith generrll taxes for the year-,
1963 through 1965, collectible in the respective ensuhg years
The total amount of each such assessaent for STREET IF?TZROVE?.TEt?TS ZOS, E-8,
E-9 AXD E-14 shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over 2 period
of fifteen years, the first of said installments, together t.ri.th interest on the entire
assessment from the date hereef to December 31, 1963, to be. payable with general taxes
for the ysar 1962, and one of the remaining installments, with one year's inti-rest on
thtlt and a11 subsequent installments, to be payable with general taxes for the years
1963 through 1976, collecttble in the respective ensuins years.
CC amy lot, piece or narcel of land assessed hereby may pay the whole of such assess-
ment or any installment thereof without interest to the '?illage Treasurer and
thereaft& such pipent may be made wj.tli accrued interest, to the County Treasure-)?;
provided that if any assessments or installments thereof be prepid to the Village
Treasurer, he shall prcbmptly notify the Village Clerk and County Auditor, and the
sss5ssment or installment so prepaid shall be cancelled on the books of the County
Audit or. .,
Auditor a certified duplicate of said assessments, with each then unpaid installment
and interest set forth separately, to be extended upon the proper tax lists of the
County, and the County Auditor shall thereafter cause said assessments to-be
collected in the manner provided by law.
ibiOv 175A, LATERAL '.JATCRa!AIN IT~IPROVEHENT iJ0, 152A, STORTl SEVER IFIPROVE!.EXT 110. GO,
AND STREET IMFROVEflENTS E-8, E-9, E-14 AMD 3-69, and all amounts collected in respect
of the assessments therein contained shall be similarly designated by the County
Treasurer and remitted to the Village Treasurer and by her credited to the
I
'b
4. The amounts so set out are hereby levied against the respective lots,
and parcels of land described in said respective proposed, and amended
The assessment against each lot, tract or oarcel,
6. The total amount of each such assessment for SPJITAXY LATERAL SE'IEP, i?O,
152A, AIJD STORfil SEYJER IYPF,OVEFlEi4T NO, 60
7. The total amount of each such assessment for STREET IHFROVET.!EI.IT NO, 8-69
8.
9. Prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, the ow-w
10, The Clerk shall,, as soon as may be, prepare and transmit to tlia County
Said duplicate shall be designated as
ASSESSME8T ROLL FOE SUPPLEMENT TO SANITARY TRUlX SEkIER C-1, SAIUTARY LATERAL SE!,IGR
1IPROVEZIE:JT DOND 2EDE!4PTION FUND.
frotion for adoption of Resolution was seconded by VanVallienburg, and on Rollcall there
were fivw sysa and no nays ., as follows: ; Mac:Iillan, aye; Tu~a, aye;
enburg, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and
10/8/62
CQHTRACTS AVllRDED FOR 171P??(3VE'fEi?T PROJECTS,
September 7, for two proposed Impmvements; action on samt needing to be taken
this even ins :
CmnciL rzvierred bids opened
1. STEEET I;TPR!Y!E:IEilT iJO. A-154 - Construction of Grading and ?ravelling
and Asuhalt Concrste Paving in ',laterman Avenue frm 3lake Road to 813 Feet East.
flanager idyde reconmended award of Contract to Black Top Service Company at
$5,404.70, as part of a "Tied" low bid on Sanitary Sewer for nortion of street,
plus Street Improvement, (Sanitary Sewer portion had been awarded at an earlier
meeting).
recomnendation a was seconded by "IacTlillan and cirried.
R03ERTS PLACE FROiI T!ILRYArJ AVE. TO WOLF AVE. : ?'.r)LF AVE, FRO71 ROBERTS PLACZ TO
VALLEY VIE:! RD. : -._ ;7.621.ID . .->.. . STREET . . - rl?nrl VIL2YAZi AVE. TO VALLEY VIE:? RnAD, - Asnhalt
Cozcrete Pavlrand Ccncretemand qutter,
Village has been able to obtain no in:ormatim fron the State which xould le2d
us to believe that the State will ?anticipate in the iinnrovenent of either
Roberts Flace or Rolf Avanuc frca either its Vaintenance op-its Construction
Fund (it has already been determined that the State cannot bz assessed for this
imprcrvenent) .
contract involvin5 Pclberte Fixe and Rolf Avenue,
it has already ordered in the entir? yoposed Improvcnlant (See Resoluticn
Orderin2 Sweet Improvenent Xo, 3A-55, Paze 232, 'Tinute 30Ck 251, with the
understanding that a rmrtion of the im?rovement be dropped at a later date
if State particination could not be secured, Fir, 3yde rayorted thxt becausa
neither '.1,62nd Street fron :li.lrym Ave, to ?alley Vier "oad, nor :!ilrgan .4venue
fron Valley Yiew Road to Pobcrts Place abut on State-oxneb properties, that, if
ikprovenent is nade on Ynese str3ets, with Pull cast to be assessed to omers
of abuttin? provzrties, the cost will be an Estjmated $11.63, as coapared 16th
the Improvenent Hearing Cost of $13.44 without EIi&r:lay Farticipatlon and $9.99
with l-Ii$ixa:y pwticipatlcn.
?%tition from :lilryan :Ivenue for the vork, resardless of State partici+ion,
(and a nisunders-tandin2 by himself and rhe Village Ennineer, vho belizved this
sentiment ?rev3Lled on 'I .62nd Street also) lor:. bidder, 14orth:iest 3ituninous
CO:, Inc. (bid of SeDtemSer 7) vas given perxission to go ahead rith vork on
lfilryan Ave, from Valley Viev~ Road to 1015 Feet South, and on :?.62nd Strsei
from 3ilryan Avenue to Valley View Pcad, at a contract ?rice of $19,508.03, using
unit prices, and estbated quantities applicable to these two streets, fro3 the
original bid of Septeqber 7--this becsuse of the necessity for doing this vork
yet this fall, in line with the petition frm :iClryan Avenue, Vr. 3yde stated
that while the Yilryan omers are 'satisfied vrith this arrangenent , conplaints
have been received from the :!,62nd Street people that they did not mnt the
improvement.
a necessity for both 7ilryan Ave, and '1.62nd St.
confirm avard of contract for Yilryan Ave, and !?,62nd St. a and raject that
portion of contract for Rolf Rve, and qoherts ?lace, Dickson's motion, that
Impmvenent as ori7inally ordered b!7 Council on Septeaber 10, 1962, be reduced
by the elinination of Xolf Avenue fron Foberts Place to '?alley V.ierr P.oad and
Roberts Place from Yilryan Aver to Rolf Ave. from sai-d improvsment; that
Council reject all bids on that ?ortion of in?rovcment, and that Council
confirm avrard of contract to ilorthvrest Bituminous Co,, Inc, for Construction of
Asphalt Concrete Paving and Concrate Curb and Gutter in Yilryan hve, from Valley
Vie1.r Road to 1015 Feet South, and in t1.62nd Street fron Yilryan Avenue to Valley
Viev Road, at $24,157.06$ was seconded by Tups and carried.
Tupa's motion, for award of contract in accordance with Vanager's
2. STREET II.EPP,OVET[EXT IN :!ILRYAN AVE, PE31: VALLEY VIEY RD. TO ROSERTS PLACE:
I 'ir. Hyde raTorted that the
lie therefore reccmended rejection OF that portion of the
?mindins the Council rhat
He added that pursuant to the supplenentary
-
He stated, too, that because of topography curb and zutter t.tas
Eie asked that Council
PICK-UP TRUCIKs TO BE PURCrIASED FROM SOUTIiDALE lIOTORS .
Tabulation of yids received tcday, pursuant to Advertisement for 3ids ?ublished
in Edina-Xorningside Courier and Construction aulletin, September 27 and October 4,
Tabulation shot:ed receipt of bids fron International Harvestw Co., Southdale
Yotors , and Hull-Dobbs, with Southdale Ilotors presenting both lot-I and second-lo.;r
bids. Recommendation was for acceptance of the Southd le Tot r bid $05 a gori BodSt
a 1954 Ford Pruck--this bein2 the secand-lo:? bid and $86 abova the lox bid, vhich
specified a !lomison Service aody,
bid, by Southdale Yotors, in accordance xith I!anager's recommendat ion, was
secoDded by Dickson and carried,
Inspector; Service Body Truck, bg Bater Depzirtment,
!lanager Hyde yesanted
F-100 with KcCabe-Povers Service aody , /Z-$5,876,08;7$e83 T. F! .i$;k? %$i8e-fRnoflr
Tupa's notion for xceptance of second-lar
Standard Scdg Truck to be used by Plumbing
CAfI FOR IIATER DEPART'?EXT TO 3E PURCHASCD FWX SOUTHDALE n2TW.S.
Tabula<<on'of 3$ds'-t&&i- Octdber a', on Ckk 2-Door Sedan, to replace a 1959 rambler .
Ainerican used by the Flirter Department.
Fairlane, beiing Southdale rfotors, low bidder at net bid, includin? Trade-In on
Xanbler, of $1,394.61, and iiull-Dobbs Ford at net bid of $1,498.91.
~73s for axard of bid to Sout'ndale Eotcrs, and Tuna so voved.
?iacl:illan and carried I
Tlr. +de presented
Two bids tiere received, both on 1963 Ford
Recornendation
?lotion seconded by
ST.JOXJS AVEWE LOTS 23'
received zn17 bids on thc zzk of four lots on St.do:?ns Avenue, Tn rzswnse to its
XDS, !k. Hyde reportcd that the Village has not
advertisement, snrl is therefore free to negotiate for the sale OF these lots, bain?
Lots 1,2 93,4,310cf: 2 , Valley Viex Terrace 3rd Pddition,
10/8/62 263
VALLEY VIE?? ROAD 3ARRICADE ???TESTED 3Y PESIDEiITS Iii AREAS TO XOnTE &ID :!EST.
i'tr. .J. 2. Lozleben, 4813 :I, 60th Street, open& tha discussion on the \?all57
T:ievT noad 3arricade by raquestinq that !.1,53th Street and '7.60th Strse-t be
barriczded for the term. of the trial Valley Vieu ?Dad barricade. ;-Ie told
Council that yoperty owners on these streets do not feel they should assume.
the trafEic that formerly traveled Balley View Soad. Dr, E, F, Allis, owner
of ccrmmercial propzrty on the idorthvest corner of Valley Viev Road and
Yooddale reported that he was given a Demit by the Srilla.Se to construct -r
bushess buildin:: at this location; thzt the barricading of Valley ?iew has
already cut off considerable of his tenants' business; thzt if T1.59-th and
;!.Goth Streets are barricaded, too, access to these business will be nearly
impossible. Ilrs, J. G. Veisbrod, 6116 Birchcrest Drive, renorted rasidents
in this area have a very dangerous hairpin turn to make to get to their homes
from the Crosstown Hightray; that they were promised a bridge ac~oss I-It~hmy
#LOO. for their children, and service roais for access, She added thst only
ten fmilies had purchased thelr homes on Valley View east 'of #lo0 before it
was made a heavy-traffic street, Tlayor Bredesen i-nformed audience that the
Council ha.s closed Valley View for a 30-to-45-day trid, hoping to educate
thru-traff ic to use the Crosstotrn 'Highway,
Drive, re?orted that if :1,59th and IJ.60th Streets are barricaded, in accordance
with sug,zestion by Vr. Losleben, turnin:: movements off and onto Highrray 100
will just be rushed further iIorth.
Streets had been presented to Council earlier this evening, siped by some
YO r2sident.s in the immediate area.
as being at corner of 66th and Wilryan, reported that the barricading of
Valley Vj-ew Road is severely handicapping those from 'Jest side of Highway
100 who wish to use the bus which terminates at Valley View Road and Concord
Avenue. Flrs, H, J, True, 4733 School Road, asked that Y,59th Street be
posted prohibiting left turns, citing danger at this intersection; and %.-o
True asked that the center stri? on Highway 100 be continued North.
Shmitka, 5121 9,59th St., objected to the island's being extended at3 far north
as !lest '-1.60th St., saying that entrance onto Hizhtray 100 is extremely
hazardous because of 60th Street i-Iill,
reported that Y.6Oth Street is now getting a11 the conmercial traffic vhich
formerly used Valley View Road,
use the Cross Town Highway, because it doesn't help anyone".
6101 Ashcroft Avenue, stated that Cross Tom traffic is increasing since
the barricading of Valley View Road.
qusstioned the authority of the Council to close Valley View %ad, inasmuch
as tli2 barricading of the street cuts off one area of the village fro% another
area.
School Road and ?f,60th Street the same consideration as that accorded to
Valley View Road and for the same period of time. FTr. ?fayne Rubel, 5112
3enton Avenue, reported that the primary interest of the residents in his
mea is getting safely across Highway 100.
speaking for idormandale Lutheran Church, asked that Valley View Road b4 opned
to traffic east and nest ,
permnently barricading Valley View
is improved the street vi11 be barricaded.
T~7dley View road asked that barricades be left u? prmanently.
objections stated here tonight 3y residents of other streets, vho arc ex?ariencin;
3n increas2 in traffic, saying there is no Jore re3.son vr%y \?alley Vim Doad
residents should hme this traffic than that any other street should ha~re it.
fi lady, vho described herself as the mother of vnrce small children, asked
that action be taken to control 60th Street traffic. She added that, novr,
she is fearful for the sai'ety of children rralkin.z-to school, ths3t sh3 cannot
let her smaller childrsn out of the house,
b1ocl;ade Valley View Road zt ths point where it goes into Crosstom Hightray.
7%. ;-bycie stated this has been ccnsidered, but bacause of traffic movement at -tiiis
particular location, sign must be very clearly stated.
suzg,i.,sted sizns for southbound traffic cn i-Iishvmy 100 ~ 5113 'f. 59th St, ,
prohibiting left turns at 59th and 60th Streets,
CouncS1, and audience was notified that Council excscts to take no zcticn on
the V8lley Vieti Road barricade until Jovenber 12.
FIana,pr I-Iyde to ?ost an informational sizn at Vallev 'clievr ?ooad and Trcsent
over?ass of Crosstown Hizhway,
the closing of Valley View Road," signed by representatives cf some 29 families
in the Birchcrest area, was 'left with Council,
..
1
flr. John Gibson, GO12 3irchcrest
Petition for barricading I.1.59th and fl.6Oth
One gentleman, who described his rasidence
!fr. R,C,
ifr. Sherman Eolian, 4820 il.60th St,,
Nr, Glenn Carlson reoorted that "no one will
Mr, YcDepmott,
The gentleman at 66th and llilryan
Hr, Dan Leach, School Road, asked that Council 3ive !1,59th Street,
One gentleman fmm Rolf Avenue,
Question was asked ccncarning pox'babil5ty. 0-F
and 'tias informed that when Hightray LOO
One resident from the East side of
He cited t%e
One man asked if it is Fossible to
i:r. ?. 1. &nnsd;r
Soma discussicn vas had IS<:
3irecticn vias Tivan to
Petition , simply stating "'.?e !.dsh to prot-zst
IIID EDIUA TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION PETITIOIJS FOX STOP SIGIIS OiI STPEETS THAT EIJTZR
TR,4C~AjIE~U~.
on entrances to Tracy Avenue and for Speed Limit qigs alonz Trac~7 hvcnuc vras
AIlD SFEdD LUIIT SIGidS ALOI'JG Ti?,4C'I AY2XUE. -
Fatition for Stop Sinns
.. supported by TIr. Kennoth 0. Olson, President of the Association. 1.y~. 3on
Berryhill, 5616 Grove Street, added his plea for a sto? sip in the vicinity OF
Grov? Street and Tracy Avenue, for traffic fron Hizhvay $E9. ?IP. Dick RO~FS,
5708'Tracy, spoke for traffic control at Tracy ,Avenue and 'jarden Avenuc, for
the new TJethodist Church,
SO U? immediately, but
!4rv Hrde informed them that Spead Limit si.zns could
request for Stop Signs should be referred to
10 /8 /62
Police Department for racomendation before action is taken by Council, iianager'
Hydo directsd to install spsed limit signs, and matter of Sto? Signs referred to
Police Department for investigation and ra?ort,
SSJTH GARDZ? kSSOCIATfQ21 REQUEST fr)R TERFIIXATIOi1 OF DUW AT '1.78TN ST. AND
264
FIWJCE AYEXJZ SUBAiIITTED,
signed by South Garden Association residents, notLfyin(l; the City of 3loonington
of opposition to the pay dump on France and 78th Street, because of the tfsmoke,
ash, smell and other health hazards", together tdth a request by South Garden
Associaticn that Edina officials request the City of 3loonington to terminate the
authority under which the dunp now ogerztes.
August 29, sent to r:r. Joe Garrison, operator of the dump, with a co?y sent to
City Council of 3loorningtcn
Xanazer Hyde subrtitted f o~ Council review a peritcon
Council revierred the letter dated
C9UXCIL FORWALIZES SEPTZIi3ER 24TH ACTIOif ARPBOVLIG FEdCETIZ TLP:TS FOR HIGKIAP 100
aETI!ELJ 0.03 I:I. SO, OF r7,64TrI ST, AiJD VALLEY VIE;? ??r)AD. "anapr Hyde reqarted
that
3e?artment requires a fcrnal resolution for its files,
following Resolation and moved its adofl-tion:
althouzh the= s fencing plm has been itanroved b~r "otion, the i-Ii.c$rmy
II&c!filfan offered the
P5;SOLUTIQiI APPROYEJG SPECIAL PS0,VLSIOJS Far: S. P.
2733-35 (T.H. 100-130) - :;LIIii[ZS3TA PPnJECT U 030-1(31)
€'E;ICI;JC ~ 9UAFD RAIL AiID PE9SA3GIT 3l\PEICADES dET-IEE;I
'I!EST @+Til STPEET PJJD VALLEY VIZ! TOAD 111 EDIilf,
!!SEl?EfiS, the Ccxnissioner of Highways has ?raparzd plans, snecial prnv?.;inns
and specifications for the ii?rovement of a part of Trunk HiSi1i-q 3unber 130
renun7bered as Trunk Highway Xumber 100 t.iithin the cor9orate linits of the VLlla3e
of Zdina fro3 0.03 'file South of Vest 64th Street to Valley 1Jiew ?cad; and
IIHERERS, said plans sre on file in the office of the Depaptment of Highwq~s,
Sdnt Paul, Tlinnesota, bein:: narked, labeled, and identified as S.P. 2733-35
(T.iI.100-130); and
i-Iighvays, Saint Paul, Cinnesota, being marked, labeled, and identified as S,P. 2733-
35 (T.H. 100-130) Ilinnesota Project U 030-1 (311, which, tcgether with the :finnesota
Department of Highways SFecifications for Highway Construction
on file in the office of the Co-R?lissioner of Highways, constitute the specifications
for said immovexent of Trunk Highway IJumber 130 renumbered as Trunk Hightray :luxbar
100; and
identified are also on file in the office of the Villaze Clerk; and
the body of this resolution shall be deerned and intended to mean, refer to, and
incorporate the plans and special provisions in the foregoing recitals F3rticularly
identified and described.
2JO!!, THE;?, 3E IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the
hmovenent of Trunk Highway Number 130 renumbered as Trunk Hishway Munber 100
within the limits of the V'illa~e of Edina be and hereby are approved;
and special ?revisions be and they $are hereby approved and consent is hereby Ziven
to any and all changes in grade occasioned by the construction of said Trunk
i3ig'nway i4u.nber 130 renu-nbered as Trunk Highway Xumber 100 in accordance vrith said
plans and special provisions,
~ME??EP,S said special provisions are on file in the office of the De2artmen-t oE
dated :Tag 1, 1959,
IIHEXEAS coDies of said plans and special provisions as so marked, labeled and
:7HEQEAS the tern "said plans and special provisions1f as hereinafter used in
, BE IT FURTHER RES@LT?ED that the elevations and zrades as shom in said plans
I PETIT1O;J FOR SA;JITARY SZYER E;iTE:JSIOX TOR EAST P.MD, OFF SKYLINE DRIVE
REFERRED TO VILLAGE EiIGIlIEER F(d9 PROr3RA:IP:IBG.
Lots 26 a= 27, Skyline Addition, was submitted by Clerk, and, by !lotion VanValkenburg,
seconded by Dickson and carried, was referred to the Village EnZinzsr for programing.
$1,,,7pP- :&A?>!. FOP DJ;;AGES FO? 111 JURIES SUFFE9ED Til FALL AT 50TH MD HALIFAX R.EFERPED
Tq JlfSLJRfiJCE, CASPI-ER AXD ?ILLAGE ATTOF$IEY,
mace, was suhitted
SU31:ITTED AHD
This petition , signed by otmers of
The clah of !lrs,. Illlda C, Hoag, 5015 Jay
reviewed, and ref erred to Insurance Carrier and SillaZe At'torney
for investigation, rcI
FIIJAL- PLAT- OF a1'~1d4~~E:1 AC%S-LAYSO:I FEPLAT" APPROVED SUSECT TO PLPiTITIIIG CWIISSIO~J
APPF?J7,AL,
Lots 1 a<d 2, :farden ,Ftcrdsft
ation that it be ap?roved subject to Planninz Ccnaission's aprctral*
Bowtheast corner Higi?r:ay 20. 159 and Trscy Avsnue, and involves no nev roads,
This Final Platy being The subdivisim into four lots,nof "tne Ys1/2 OF
presented by Plannins Diractor FIite, 15th reccmend-
Flat lccatecl at
- -.. 2 -- --
265 10/3/62
*lac'jillan'~ motion, that Final Plat of Cardm Acres
subject to aporoval by Planning Commission vas seconded by Dickson and carried,
ELECTION OFFICIALS APPOINTED FOR YOVEr43EF: 6T3 r;EIJEPAL-VILLAGE ELECTIOil , ?aster
-:-on 0- placed in noxination by Clerk, and VmVa1kenbix-g mcved
for anpoi-ntment of offjctals named on szid roster.
carried e
Larson Ye?lat be a?woved
\.
Yotion seconded bv Dickson and
PUBLIC HEARIXGS @:I I~TPWVE'I.IE16TS SCXDULED FOP FIQ;\ID(\Y, QCT03P 22.
GieflJy revwthe CoFil the imyovemsnts For rThi-cii he rzcommends Fublfc
lienrin~s on October 22 , and VanValkenburg offerad the follouinz Desolution and
moved its adoption:
Enzineer 'Ic?nzs
RESOLIJTIOJ PFOVIDIIIS FOR PU3LIC HCAPI'lSf OiI
AXD 4SPHALT REPLACEVEHT 1F'lPROVEZ.IEiJTS
PROPOSED SANITARY SE'TE?, STOT'I SETJEP, 'JP.TEl?'lAILl
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edins:
as to the feasjbility of the prooosed SA;JITP.?Y SEVER, 'dATERHAIII, STQW SETUP AiJD
ASPHALT PJPLACEVEYT IflPWVEF'ENTS described in the three (3) Forms OF iTotj.ce of
Hearings set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such 3'.mprovcaents, sa?d
report 3's herebv anproved and directed to be phced on file In the office of the
Village Clerk,
Edina Villa9e Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all oersons interested
in said ?roposad improvements,
place and rrurposg of said meeting to be published in the official newsflaper once a
rreek for two successive weeks, the second of which publications is to be not
less than three days from date of said meetinz:, trhich notice shall be in substantially
the follovin;: forms :
1, The Village Engineer, havin$ submitted to thz Council a Frelimiriary report
2. This Council shall meet on Fbnd?y, 9ctober 22, 1962, at 7:OO Pallr, in the
3. The Clerk is herebv authorized and dir-tcted to cause notice of the time,
(1) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 014
STOP,?! SET!ER ." GDGIA VILLPGE COUNCIL will meet at the Edina Village Hall on !Ionday, 9ctober 22,
1962, at 7:OO P.F.I., to consider the followin.5 proposed improvement to be constructed
under the authority granted by 74innesota Laws of 1953, Chapter 338. T'ne approximate
cclst of said improvement is estimated by the, Village Engineer as set forth below:
COHSTRUCTIOH OF VILLAGE STORb? SEWER AUD APPURTENAi6CES
IN THE FOLLO!?ING:
ES TI NATED COST
Zalifax Lane from a point in existing storn sewer
line 330' S, ofJJ.54th St.; thence S, to a point
3' N. of the S. line of Lot 1, Block 4, Elmwood
I'
Terrace ; thence !I, to Plinnehaha Creek, $ 9,77.87
The area Froposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Storm Sewer includes
all lots and tracts of land within the following described boundaries:
"Beginning at a point on the If. line of Lot 2, B1, 1, Elmwood Terrace, said point
being 15' i4, of the N,E, corner of said lot; th, S, and parallel to the E. line of
said Lot 2 to a point on the S, line of Lot 1, 31. 1, Elnnond Terr, ; th, S!Ily to a
point on the N, line of the 21.55.47' of the S, 164,97' of the E, 197.67' of the
H.E.1/4 of the 1T.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of: Sec.19, Twp,28, Ra, 24, dist, 140' :I. of
the N.E. corner thereof; th, S. to a point on the N, line of Lot 2, 31. 2, Elmwood
Terrzice, said point being 140' !?I. from the-N.E, corner of said lot; th, SCly to a
point on the E. line of Lot 2, 81. 2, Elmwood Terrace, said point being 50.04' S.
of the iJ.E. corner thereof; th. E. to a point on the E. line of France Ave,, said
point being 20' S, of the S,Yi corner of Lot 4, 31. 5, 3oodbury Park Wear Lake
Harriet; th. 14. along the E, line of France Ave, to the S, line of 'Jest Fuller St,;
th. E. along the S. line' of Vest Fuller St. 3. dist. of 227' ; th, NVly to the S,E.
corner of Lot 13, Bl. 4, Ivandale Par?< Hear Lake ilarriet; th, N:iTly to the J.!?,
corner of Lot 12, B1. 4* Ivandale Fark Near Lake Harrie't; th. I(. to the ZsZ, corner
of Lot 6, 31, 4, Ivandale Park Near Lake Harriet; th, E, to the H.E. corner'of Lot 3,
31. 4, Ivandale Park Near Lake Harriet; th, S. cn E. lins of Lot 3, 31, 4, lvandale
Fark ilear Lake Zarriet a dist. of 30'; th, E, znd parallel to the IJ, line of Lots 1
and 2, 31. 4, Ivandale ?ark Xear Lake Harriet, to th3 E, line of slid Lot 1, 31, 4,
Ivandale Park 2ear Lake Harriet; th, ;,?E~v to the S,U, corner of Lot 16, 31. E,
%avthorne Park Second Division; th, MEly to a point in Lot 16, 31, 6, ilawthorne
Park Second Division, said point beinp, 30' E. of and 5' i?. of the Sa\?, corner
of said Lot 16; tho 14, and parallel to the center line of S. E~7inz AVP-. to a wint
in Lot 30, 21, 6, Hawthorne Park Second Diyision, said point bein2 30' E, OF a.nd 5'
S, of the N,F?. corner of said Lot 30; th, N!Jly to the iJ,TqI. corner 01 Lot 30, 31.6,
3avrthorne Park Second Division; th. !.T, to the N,!J, corner of Lot 1, 31. 5, i4azthorna
Park Second Divison; th, SF?ly to a point in Lot 1, 21, 5, Havthorne Park Second
Divlsion, said noint beinz 30' 1J, of and 5' S, of the M,E, corner of said Lot 1; tls,
S. ?arallel to the center line of S. Evlinr: Ave, and to a yoint on the S, 1j.m OF
Lot 4, 31. 5, Iiawthorne Park Second Division, saLd point bein2 30' E. of the S,E,
cerner of said Lot 4, 13lock 5 iiavrthornen .Park Second Divis;..on; th. S!Tly to the i?.!T,
corner of Lot 6, 21. 5, Hawthorne Park Second Division; th, 7. to the N.E. cornar of
I
10/8/62
Lot 25, 31. 5, ;-:awthorne Park Second Division;
,24, 31. 5, Havthorns Park Second Division; th,
31. 1, South 3srriet Park Seccnd Addn.: th. '?,
th. SYly to the Serf, corner of Lot
S"!ljr to the X,E, corner of Lot 17,
to a ooint on the 3. line OF Lot 17,
Block 1, South HwEiet ?ark Second AdditLon, said noint being 25'
corner of said lot; th, S:.117 to a point in Lot 18, 31. 1, South harriet Park Second
Addn., said point being 35' :I, of the E. lot line and 147' ;I. of the S. lot line
of said Lot 18; th, Y, to a point in Lot 18, 31. 1, South Harriet Park Second
Addition, said ?oint being 143' ?I, of the E. lot line and 147' 24. of the S. lot line
of said lot; th. S. to a ooint on the S. lot line of Lot 18, 51, 1, South Harriet
Park Second Addn,, said mint being 143' :J, of the S,M. corner of said lot; th.
S'Jly to a point on the S. line of ?1,54th St., said point being 30' E, of the i1.E.
corner of Lot 10, South I"id2e Addn., th. S. to a point on the S. line extended of
Lot 8, South ?id=e Addn., said point being 30' E. of the S,%, corner of said Lot 8;
th, SEly to Foint of beginnin?."
Eron the il.€,
GRETCHEN S, ALDEX
Village Clerk
(2) HOTICE 9F PUBLIC HEARI3GS OJ
LRTESAL SA'IIITARY SEVER, LATERAL :?ATZR?'AI,i?
TRUX SATEI?'IAIiJ, ABD ASPIf ALT CORCPETE PEPLACEFIEXT
EDIQA VILLAGE COUlJCIL ~i.11 meet at the Edina Villsge ilall on :;onday, October 22, 1962,
at 7:OO €'.;I., to consider the Followin:! yoposed inorovaments to br- constructed under
the authority granted by Yinnesota La:m of 1953, Chapter 398,
of said improvements is estimated by the Villase Enzineer as set forth belcx:
1. CQXSTRUCTIOiI OF SI LLAGE LATERAL SPJ.IITA2Y SE!ER AND APPURTEIIAXES
The ayprosinate cost
ESTIXATED COST :
13 TIE FOLLW7IIJG :
A. Laracla Lane fron Parkwocd Road to 450 feet north
2 C0;iSTTIUCTIOH OF VILLAGE L.4TE??AL 'JATER'7AIN AiID APPURTE3AIICES
I3 THE FOLLOXIIS:
A. /$arkwood Xd, fro1 a notnt 115 feet, more or less, north
harkwood Lane from Parkvood rid, to the south line of
dLondonderry Xd, frm the north end of Stauder Circle
/Parkwood Rd, froin Londonderry Rd, to Lsrada Lane
r/Larada Lane fron ?arkwood Rd, to north line of
$ 9,102,32
of the north line of Lot 1, Block 2, Parkwocd Knolls 4th
Addition to Londonderry Rd,
Ppkwccd Knolls 4th Addn,
south to Parkvrood Pd,
Parkviocd Knolls Addn. $35,334.99
3, COidSTRUCTIOiJ OF VILLAGE TRUXX KID LATERAL :IATEEIIAI;I AXD
APPURTEIJANCES IiJ THE FOLL3:IIJC; :
A, dhew Lane from Xighway $169-212 to Schaefer Rd.;
Achaefer Yd, fron View Lane to the 2esterly line of
Parkwood :(nolls 11th Addn . ;
distance of 525 feet;
distance of 525.07 feet;
10' E. of the centerline of Londonderry Ed. extended S.
/Londcnd@rry Rd. frcrn 10' S. of Farkriood Knolls Addn. PI,
to :lest Stauder Circle;
(:Jest Stauder, Circls fron Londcnderry Rd. :I, to
Londonderry nd. ;
V/Londcnderry Rd. fron '?est Stauder Circle to a ?o?'nt on
Parhiood Qd. 115' more or less, IT. of the X. line of
Lot 1, 31. 2, Par!:mod Knolls 4th Addn.
C0;SSTXUCTICXJ OF ASPHALT CCCJCPZTE S!E?LACZ'IEiIT 011 TiIE FOLLr)T?C:IS :
P,, &arada Lme fron Park:ioad Rd. to :I, fine of Parkercscd Knolls
L,4%ir?i?7c03 ?d, frm Larada Lane to Londcnderry Rd , ;
i/fiondondarry Wd. fro3 S. lins of Farlniood Knolls Addn. to
harkvocd Yd. fron intersection of Londonderrg Fld. and
+ktauder Circle fro7 Parlmocd Rd. to Londonderry Rd , ;
/Parkwood Lane fro9 Parkwood Rd. S. to S. ltne of
Thence S!.?ly at a deflection angle to the left 68O30' a
TQence E?ly at a deflection angle to the rizht 56OOO' a
Thence 3, 10' S, of Parknood Knolls Addn, to a point
$81,106,30
4.
2. Par?twood 3d.j
Stauder Circle to Londcnderry Yd.;
.
farhood ;inolls 4t'l I\.ddn , Sa ,535 69
The apez proposed to be assessed for the cost of thz pronosed Lateral Sanitary Sav:er
under 1-8 above includes Lots 3 CS 4, Block 2; Lots 1, 2 8 3, alcck 3, all in Dar!aood
:<nolls P'ddn ..
Tie area proposed to b-3 assessed for the cost of the pro?osed Lateral '!atermin under
2-1? above includes Lots 3 E 4, 31. 2, Lots 1 thru 7 incl., 31, 3; Lots 2 thru 5 incl.,
31. 5, all in Parkrood ::nolls Addn,; Lots 6 thru 9 Lncl., 31. 1; Lots 1 thru 6, incl.,
81. 2, all in Parkwood bolls 2nd Addn, ; Lots 5 thru 9 incl., 31. 1; Lots 1 thru 9
incl., 31. 2, all Ln Farl;r.racd :<nolls 4th Addn,; and 1 unplatted lot for Parcel (0375)
in Sec, 30, T.117, X,21.
297 10/8/62
The area pronosed to be assessed for the cost of the pro?osed Lateral i7atermaf
iindSr 3-A above includes Lots 2 E 3, Block 6, Parkwood dnolls Addn.; Lots 1 thru
5 incl. Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 2nd Addn. ; Lot 1, slack 1, Parkwood Knolls 9th
A&~n.; Lot 1, Eilocl: 1, Parkwood Knolls 10th Addn.;
Lots 1 thru 6 incl,, Slock 2, Lots 1 tliru 8 incl., Block 3, Lots 1 thru 6 incl,,
3lock 4, all in Parkwood Knolls 11th Addn,; 9 unplatted lots in Parcel (2720) in
aec, 30, T. 117, 7.. 21; 8 un~latted lots in Parcel (0375) in Sec. 30, T. 117,
2, 21; Lots'l thru 4 incl,, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 4th Addn,
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Trunk :.latermain
under 3-A above includes all lots and tracts of land within the following
described boundaries:
"Comnencing at N,Y. corner of Sec,31,T.l17,R..21; th, S, along the center lina
of Cty. Rd.#18 to center line of Roushar Rd.; th, E. alon? center line. OF Roushar
Rd. to center line of State Hrry,#lG9-212; th, NEly alonq center lhe of State
Hwy.8169-212 to W, line of Parkwood Knolls 8th Addn, extended S, to center line
of Hwy,#169-212; th, NIJly, XEly, I?, , 1J\lly, and idEly along I!, line of Parkwood
Knolls 8th Addn. to H.E. corner of Lot 1, B1. 1, Parkwood Knolls 8th Addn,; th.
HVly to S.E. corner of Lot 5, Bl, 2, Parkwood Knolls 5th Addn.; th, 1I'ITly to S,E,
corner of Lot 5 B1. 2 Parkwood Knolls 5th Addn, ; th. NVly a1on.t; rear lot lines
of Lots 1 thru 5 of said B1, 2, to center line of Schaefer Rd,; th, il, alonz
center line of Schaefer 'id, to i?, line of Sec. 319T,117,R.21; th, t!. along id,
line of said Section to Wl/4 corner thereof; th, $1. aloq E, line of SU1/4 Sec.
30, T.l17,R,21, a dist. of 215'; th, lWli2 Vly and SVly parallel to and 215' ii*?
!!, , and Sly of center line of Parkwood Rd, to N.:J. corner of I$.El/4 02 N.;J,1/4
of Sec. 3l9T.117,R.2L; th. N, along 14. line of Sec, 3l9T,1l7,R,21, to 9oint of
Lots 1 thru 4 incl,, 3lock 1,
rl
beg inning , It .
The area proposed to be assessed for
Replacement under 4-A above includes
streets pronosed to be improved.
(3) I6r)TICE OF PUBLIC
SANITARY SEIsIER,
the cost of the propxed Asphalt Concpete
all lots and tracts of land abuttin2 the
GRETCHEN S. ALDElT
Village Clerk
HEARI8CS ON
TlATEi?%UN,
AND STORM SEVER
EDIN.4 VILLAGE COUXCIL will meet at the Edina Villa.;e Hall on llonday, October 22,
1962, at 7:OO P.M., to consider the followinq yoposed improvements to be con-
structed under the authority granted by Flinnesota Laws of 1953
The approximate cost of said improvements is estimated by the Village Engineer
as set forth below: ESTTHATED COST
1, CONSTRUCTIO~LJ OF' VILLAGE SAHITARY SEVER AND AP?URTEMAI;ICSS
Cha?ter 398,
IN THE FOLLOIII11C; :
~T?est Shore Drive from Hibiscus Ave, to Hriy.fj100
yPoppy Lane from \?est Shore Drive to Hr2ry.1'#100
g.!::ellog,g Ave, from Hibiscus Ave, to 466' S,
+,5edurn Lane from Vest Shore Drive to Kellogg Ave.
*,Hibiscus Ave. fpom Vest Shore Drive .to Kellogg Ave,
THE FOLLOWIISG :
$62,925.15
2, CQHSTRUCTIOIJ OF VILLAGE WATEF%AfN PsND APPURTENANCES Iid
j.I1ibiscus Avet from :Jest Shore Dr, to Kellogg Ave.
I/";Jest Shore Dr. from Hibiscus Aver to ilwy,#lOO
v qpy Lane from Yest Shore Drive to II./~y,#100
Jedum Lane from 'lest Shore Drive to Ksllogq Ave,
Ir;;;~-llogg Ave, from Gilford Dr, to S. line of
Lake Edina 4th Addn.
East Ssrvice Dr. of Hi/iy,#lOO fro= West Show Dr,
to Poyy Lane $75,236 I 59
3. CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE ST09rl SEIIER AlJD APIUQ.TEIJA,ICES 11.1
Tl-LE FflLLOI!IIIG :
/:lest Shore Drive at the intersect?-on of ??. curb line 3nd
ii. line of Lcit 21, 31, 1, Lake Edina 3rd Addn. extended Ely;
r)n an easenent line b$tr:.een Lots 15 and 16, 3lock 1, Lake
. Edina 3rd ,"idn, from !Test Shore Dr, to Lake Edina;
rjn an easement line between Lots 7, 8, ,md 9, 310~1: 1,
Lske Edina 3rd Addn. from :!est Shore Drive to Lake Zdina $ 5,978.90
Th,? pro7osad to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Sanitary Sever
under L a.bcsvc includes Lots 1 thru 21, incl;, 31. 1; Lots 1 thru 12, incl., 31, 2;
Lots1 thru 13, incl., Block 3; Lots 1 thru 3, incl., B1. 4; all in Lakz Edlna 3rd
Addn. ; Lots 7 thru 13, hcl, , 31. 2; Lots 1 thru 7, incl, , 31, 3; Lots .1 tliru 8,
Lncl,, 21. 4, all i.n Lake Edina 4th Addn.;.and 7 unnlatted lots in Tract A of
R,L.S, 2679, Sec. 3lgT,28,R.24.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the yopsed watemain under
2 above includes Lots 1 thru 21, incl,, El. 1; Lots 1 thru 12, j.ncl., 31, 2; Lots
1 thru 13, incl., 31. 3; and Lots 1 thru 4, incl,, 31, 4; all in Lake Zdina. 3rd
Addn,; Lots 1 thru 9, incl,, 31, 1; Lots 1 thru 13, incl,, 31. 2; Lots L thru 7,
incl., 31. 3; Lots 1 thru 8, incl., 51. 4, all in Lake Zdina 4th Addn,; ad 7
unplatted lots in Tract A of R.L,S, #G79, Ssc, 31, T.28, P,,24.
10/8/62
The area yroFosad to be asssssod for -the ccst oE the prooosed sTorm semr 268
under 3 above includes a11 lots and tracts of land within the folloving
described boundaries:
"Conmencinz at center of intersection of Hibiscus five, and :lest Shore Dr, S,;
th. SSly to X.E. corner of Lot 21, B1. 1, Lake Edina 3rd Addn,; th. Silly along
16. line of Lot 21 a dist. of 35' ; th. Sly, SVly and illy parallel to and 35'
1Tly and Ely of the X. line of Vest Shore Dr. . and the E line of Poppy Lane to
a point on E. line of Lot 4, 31. 1, Lake Edina 3rd Addn., said point being 35' IJ.
of S.3. corner thereof; th, S. to 3.W. corner of Lot 5, B1. 2, Lake Edina 3rd
Addn.; th. S. to S+21e corner of Lot 8, 31. 2, Lake Edina 3rd Addn,; th. SE1y to
the 1d.W. corner or' Lot I, 31. 3, Lake Edina 3rd Addn. ; th, 1TEl;r to a point on
the E, line of said Lot 1, said point being 35' S, of ;{.E* corner thereof; th.
E., HEly, SEly, and ;fly parallel to and 35' S, of the S. line of :Jest Shore Dr.
. to a point on the iIly line of Lot 12, €31. 3, Lake Edina 3rd Addn. , said point
being 35' S. of the i?,W. corner thereof; th. iily to the I?.:]. corner of Lot 13,
B1. 3, Lake Edina 3rd Addn.; th. Nly to S.Y, comer of Lot 1, Bl. 4, Lake Edina
3rd Addn,; th. IIEly to a point on il, line of said Lot 1, said point beinE 35' E.
of H.Y. corner thereof; th, Hly parallel to and 35' E, of E, line of Ikst Shora
Dr. to a point in Lot 4, 51, 4, Lake Edina 3rd Addn,, said point bein3 35' S.
and 35? E, of 7,t.l. corner of said lot; th, E. parallel to and 35' S, of S. line
of Hibiscus Ave, to a point in Lot 4, B1. 2, Lake Edins 4th Addn,, said point
being 35' S, and 35' 9, of 11,E. corner of said Lot 4; th, 3, to center line, of
Xibiscus Ave. ; th. :I. to point of bezinning."
t
GRETCKEN S. ALDEi?
Village (!lei-k
were five ayes and no nays, as follows:
VanValkenburg , aye ; and Bredesen , aye ; and
Di
COU!?CIL AUTHOPIZES BIDS FOP. 1F:PROVE'IENT PRQJECTS , LETTING TO 3E OCTOSER 22.
Village En2ineer TJegner advocated taking bid: October 22nd on several inprove-
nents, for which plans have been prepa'red,
and VanValkenburg offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption :
3rief review was made of projects,.
RESOLUTIOiT APPRC)VIXG PLAXS AtID SPECIFICATIOX FOX
I?lPROVZ!iE:$T~ DIRECTING ADVERT1SE:IEHT FOR BIDS D PROPOSED SAiJITARY SE:?ER , '.IATER!4AI:J1 A:JD STOR'I SEPER
3E IT YSSOLVED by the Sillage Council of the Village of Edina:
A;iD STOW SE!EP. I'IPE(fVE15E:ITS set forth in the follo!.rin:: Advertise-nent for 3ids
fom, heretofore preparad by the Village Engineer and no!-? on fila in the office
of tine I'illaze Clerk arz hsreby ziF?raved ,
2.
Courier and the Constructton 3ulletin ths followhq notice for bids for said
iii?rcrvenents :
1. The ?lans and saec5.fications for the pro?osed SP.Z?ITAYY SC:!%F',, :?STZP'"AI:T
T'ne Clerk shall cause to be published t:;ice in the Edina-*tTorninqsicie
ADI%RTISE::EIIT FOR BIDS
SAiIIT,4RY SEVER ~ VRTES"IAI;I I
PHD STORI: SEIERS
SEALED 3IDS will be received and opened in the office of the Village 'Yanqer
in the Edina Village Hall, 4531 :J.SOth St,, at 1l:i)O Ifonday, Octobar 22,
1962, and the Edina Vlillaga Council will meet Tt 7:OO P,':,, on '.;onda;7, October
22, 1962, ta considel. said bids, bein3 for the follor+:inz:
I, C[>IISTEUCTIO:I OF '!ILLt4C, SAINITIZRY SElfER AT4D ATFUBTET %ICES Iil 'f,E FOLLO'.:I;J? :
A, Yest Shore Drive fron 'rIibiscus Ave. to H.;!g.;~lOO
Poppy Lane from T,?est Shora Drive to Ht~~7,tEloO
Kellogg Ave. fro.? dibiscus Ave. to 466' S.
SedaT Lane frcn :!est Shore Drive to Xellcgg Ave,
Hibiscus hve. fron 9e3t Shore Drive to Xellozg .Five,
2. CCC6SPFUCTZO;d OF PI LLArjE :lATER'?AIH NJD APPU?TEIXTCES I;! TIIE FQLL9:!IilZ :
A, Hibiscus Ave, fro? :lest Shore Dr, to Xe11ozg Ava.
:!est Shore nr. frcn Hibiscus Ave, to Iir.iy,$lOO
Poipi Lane from Sest Shore Drive to Hwy.$100
Sedun Lane Trm Yest Shore Dr. to %ellog2 Ave,
:/\ellog9 five, Erc-n Gilford Dr, to S, line of
East Service Dr. of iIwy,#lOO fron !!est Shore Dr,
Lake Edina 4th Addn.
to Pappj Lano.,
*.
3 CGJSTSUCTICXJ OF VILLAG'% STDY.1 SGIIERS A;ID AFTU2TEiJARCZS 111 TiiE FOLLO:fI;dG:
A, Uest Shore Drive at intersection of 'I, curb line and I?, line of Lot 21,
Block 1, Lake Xi-na 3rd Addn. extended easterly;
On an easement line betvzen Lots 15 and 16, 3lock 1, Lake Edina 3rd
Addn, fron !led Share Dr. to Lake Edina;
OR an easement line betwen Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 1, Lake Edina 3rd
, Addn. frci :lest Shore Drive to Lake Edina.
10/8/62 269
3, 1Ialifax.Lane from a point in existing storm semr line
330' S. of V.54th St,; th. S, to a point 3' 14, of the
S1 line of Lot 1, B1. 4, Elmwood Terrace; th. !*T, to
2linnehaha Creek,
!lark must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the
office of the Village Clerk,
deposit of $10.00 (by check), which deposit will be refunded upn return of
said plans and sp3cifications.
accompanied by cash deposit, bid bond or certified check 2ayable to the
Villaee Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10) Fwcent of amount OF base
bi-d.
3Y ORDER OF THE EDIiJA VILLAGE COUi6CIL.
Plans and speciEications are available for a
Xo bids will be considered unless sealed and
The Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids,
GRETCHEH '3, ALDEi'4
6 Village Clerk
Each and all of the terms of the forngoing advertisement for bids ars 3.
hereby adopted as the terms and condTtions of award of the contract for said
imnrovement.
Votion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Dickson, and an Rollcall
diPPR.AISAL FOR 40-ACRF DAVIS TRACT $43,750 ,OO, YIanager Hyde reported he hw
received word that the Appraisal- for the 40-acre Davis Tract, just I'lorth of
the School-owned property on Valley View Road, is $43,750.00, rrinich amount
includes $8,752 delinquent taxes; that this is about the valuation expected
by the Village.
BOND SALE FORMALLY APPROVED,
timi' 'r&tive to ?ne sale of bonds, Finance Director Dalen $resented Resolution
for Council consideratj-on, pertinent to said sale,
TuFa offered the following resolution and moved its ado$ ion :
Pursuant to the discussions held fron time to
After review b57 Council,
RESOLUTIOX PROVIDIIJG FOR PU3LIC SALE OF
$150,000 PAFX SYSTQ4 BQIJDS AHD $1,000,000
IMPROVEME~~iT BOlJDS
3E IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina,
Yinnesota, as follows :
1.
form of notice hereinafter contained for the purpose of receiving and con-
s;-dering sealed bids for, and avarding the sale of $150,000 Park System Sonds
of said Village, authorized to be issued by vote of the electors votin? at an
election duly called and held, and $1,000,000 ImpTovernent 3onds to be iswad
nursuznt to the authority of Chapter 429
af vzrious local improvements,
2.. The Clerk has heretofore been authorized and directed tn cause
notice of the tlme, ?lace and purpose of said neetln? to be publlsh2d at least
ten days in advance of the time of said meeting .in the official ner.rspa?or of
the VCllage and in the Commercial Hest, a Feriodical ?ubli,_shed in Pinneapolis,
?;innesota
vrhfch notices are in substantially the folloxing forin:
This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the
?,!innesota Statutes, for the Financing
giving financial news and of general circul3ttioi-1 thkou+out the state,
!JOTICE r)F SALE
$1,150,000 GEliERP..L O2LIGATiO;J 30idDS
VILLAGE 3F EDLNA ~ I-IEXINEPLY CDGJTY TfI:JiJESCITh
i?OTICE IS iIEXZ3Y GIVZll t'nat the Council of the Village oE Edinl,
:* Irnn~zsata., .irill meet at the Village Hall, 4SOl :lest 50th StrGet, Edin3 24, Vinre-
sota on lfonday, October 22, 1962, at 7:OO o'clock P,?f,, Central Standard TCn.s, to
open, receive and consider
bonds OP th% Village in the aggregate amount of $1,150,000, including $l,r100,000
Ivprovenent 3onds to be issued yrsuant to Cha?ter 429, 1iinneso-k Statute-,, for thc
financing of the construction of various water main, sanitary and storrq semi- and
strezt improvements, in antici~ation of the collection of snecial assessments
levied and to ba levied therefor; and $150,000 Park System 3onds, to fie iszued
pursuant to Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes, for the finmcinz of the acquisition
of pwks and playgrounds, and to be payable ?rimariljj fro3 taxes u5on all taxable
propzrty within the municipality, levied pior to the issuance OB the bonds. The
full faith and credit of the Village will be pledged for the payment OF both
issues, with interest, and for the lev37 of any additional ta'xes necessapy for
deficiencies, The bonds of both issues mill be dated as of December 1, 1962,
2nd will bear interest at a rate or rates to be desiznated by tha succsssful
bidder, payable semiannually on June 1 and Decenber 1 in each year* The
Improvenent Bonds vfll mature serially in the mount of $100,000 on December 1
tn each of the yeaws 1964 through 1373, without option of orior papent. The
Park System aonds dl1 mature serially on December 1 in the amount of $15,000
in each of the years 1963 through 1966 and $10,000 in each of the ~reql*s 1967
sealed bids for and award the sale of general obliration -1
270 10/8/62
1975, vithout owtion of prior paynent,
the 2urchaser r-rithout cost and xithin forty-five days after the date of sale the
printed and executed bonds of each issue and the approving lezal opinion thereon
of 'iessrs . Dorszy , Oven
together vith the custmary certificate evidencing absence of threatened or
2snding litigation affecting the validity of the bonds,
mailed or delivered to the undersiped Clerk, and must be received at her office
?rior to the time of the meeting,
companied by a cashier's or certified check or bank draft in an mount not less
than $23,000, payable to the Villaee Treasurer, to be retained by the Village as
liquidzted dama2es if th~ bid should be acce?ted and the bidder shall fail to
comdy therewith,
cost, conputed to the stated maturities of the bonds at the cou?on rate or rates
specified, less the mount cf any premium offered, Each coxpon rate stated, and
the aggregate interest rate vhen represented by more than one set of coupons,
must be an integral multiple of 1/4 or 1/10 of 1% per annum. 3ids must spcify a
uniform rate of interest from date of issue to maturity for all bonds maturing
on a single date, but may specify an additi-onal rate of interest to be Fayable on
any or all bonds For any portion of their tern, reprssented by suylemental couFons.
The bcnds will be issued in the denominaticn of $1,000 o~ $5,000 each, 2s specified
by the purchsser vithin 48 hcurs after the sale.
than the par value of all of the bonds, ?ius accrued intere%t, rrill be considered.
The Counc5.L reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to ::-.,ive any Snfor3alitp
in any bid, an6 to adfourn the sale iB deened ex2edient.
The Village t.:ill furnish and deliver to
!:arquart , Yindhorst G Mest, of :Iinneanolis , Yinnesot3,
Sealed bids marked "Bid for $1,150,000 qeneral Obltgation 3onds" nay be
Eac?i bid must be unconditional and must be ac-
30nds will be preferred on the basis of the lorrest net interest I
~Jc! oral bid and no bid For less
3Y n?DE2 nF THE VILLAGE C'I'J;:CIL
GRETC3E:f S , ALDZJ
Village Clerk
4801 'lest 50th Street
Edina 24, "?innseota
3, Each and all of the terns and movisions of t:ie foreyoin?
nctice are hereby sdopted as the terns and conditions OF said bcnds and
sale thereof.
f0r.n of .
of the
:fotion for adoation of the foreZoin2 resolution was duly seconded by Vember
VanValkenburg, and u?on vote beinq takzn thereon, the Followinc: menhers voted in
I
CLAI:IS PAID.
dated October 8, 1962, vas seconded by Dickson and carried:
$11.06.69; %ter Fund, $1,067.70; Liquor Fund, $25,596-94; Set+sr ?ental Fund, $132.76;
P.I.X. and Poor Funds, S144.29-Tota1, $36,979.69.
?:c;tion by Tup, for ?aynint of the follovinn, ClaiTs, as per Prs-List
General Fund, $3,316.59; Constructicn Fund, $254.72; Park 15 Park Canst. FunGL,
The meeting's a7enda's haviq been covered, 'iac'lillan naveci for adjcurnwnt.
Xotion seccnded TUPS and carried. b.djournmentAst 10:40 P.::,
.