HomeMy WebLinkAbout19640302_regular21 2/17/64
MAYOR BREDESEN'S BIRTHDAY CELEBRATED.
recessed for a few minutes while Mayor Bredesen received felicitations (in song
and verse) on the occasion of his birthday.
CLAIMS PAID.
List.dated February 17, 1964, was seconded by Tupa and carried:'
General Fund, $9,075.81; Park, Park Sinking Fund and Golf Course Fund,
$31,550.35; Waterworks Funds, $28,179.12; Liquor Dispensary Fund, $54,496.95;
Sewer Rental Fund, $353.98; Improvement Funds, $627,210.76; Poor Fund, $154.90-
TOTAL, $751,021.87.
The formal business of the Council was
MacMillan's motion for payment of the following Claims as!per Pre-
Meeting's agenda's having been covered, Tupa moved for adjournment.
by MacMillan and carried.
Motion second'ed
Adjournment at 9
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA
VILLAGE COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY, MARCH 2, 1964,
AT 7:OO P.M., AT THE EDINA VILLAGE HALL.
Members answering Rollcall were MacMillan, Rixe,'Tupa; VanValkenburg and Bredesen.
MINUTES of the February 3rd and 17th, 1964 Meetings were approved as submitted, by
VanValkenburg, seconded ,by Rixe and carried.
COUNCIL AUTHORIZES BUILDING OF APARTPENT AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF VALLEY VIEW ROAD
AND WOODDALE AVENUE UNDER PROVISIONS OF "COMMUNITY STORE DISTRICT" PORTION OF
ZONING ORDINANCE. Mayor Bredesen announced that Council would conduct Public
Hearing--continued from Hearing of February 17--on the proposed Rezoning from
Community Store District to R-5 Multiple Residence District of the area at the
Southwest Corner of Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue, -He reviewed for Council
and audience the communication dated February 27, 1964, from Mr. Kenneth W. Green,
attorney for the proponents of the 80-unit apartment building proposed to be
constructed on this site.. Letter stated that Mr. Green's clients "do not need
and do not.desire rezoning from community store district to R-5--that they desire
that the zoning continue as community store; they simply request the Council's
approval and request the granting of a building permit for the erection of an
apartment building under the current zoning of community store district". The
letter went on to state that proponents are willing to eliminate the penthouses
from the apartment to reduce the height, and are willing to meet the 40' height
requirement of the cornunity store district by such excavation or other adjust-
ments as are needed.
Bredesen as to whether "the building will be basically the same, with the exception
that the penthouses will be eliminated and building will be lowered to aeet the
Mr. Green was present, and at a question from Hayor
. 40-foot median at Valley View Road", he replied, lgBasically, yes."
Mr. Flaskamp, attorney for the apposition,told Council that if proponents
have decided to ask for permit under present zoning there is nothing for his
group to say.
build right up to the street.
be the same as that formeUy proposed when rezoning to R-5 was being considered,
Ppopanents said nothing to the contrary,
constructed under the R-5 Multiple Residence requirements, but that inasmuch as
proponents now wish to comply with Community Store requirements rather than
attempt further to overcome neighbors' objections to the R-5*, there is little
Council can do require R-5.
a great deal since this particular property was rezoned ttComunity Store"; that
there are only a very few parcels of undeveloped property in the Village zoned
in.this manner.
permit for building apartment at Southwest Corner Valley View and Wooddale Avenue
under the conditions outlined in Mr, Green's communication dated February 27, 1964,
and MacMillan so moved.
A question was asked as to whether this action means that proponents may
Manager Hyde said he presumes the setback will
Trustee MacMillan informed audience that there may have been a better building
Village Attorney Hasselquist added that village zoning ordinance has changed
Mayor Bredesen entertained a motion instructing Building Inspector to issue
Motion seconded by Rixe and carried.
PEARCE SISTERS REQUEST REPORT ON ASSESSMENT FOR STORM SEWER: TO BE MADE MARCH 16.
At a request from the Misses Katherine and M.E. Pearce, and Mr. A.C.Godward, that
they be given a full report as to the status of their storm sewer assessment (the
Pearces maintained they are being assessed $25,000 for a storm sewer for which their
property receives no benefit; and Mr. Godward added that at one time, in about 1960,
one plan showed storm drains on crosstown highway land, extended to take care of
the Southdale and Pearce properties; that ibis plan was referred to him, and he
reported that proposed assessment .was fair-but that this plan was later abandoned)
Council referred matter to Village Engineer Hite for report at the meeting of
March 16. Miss Katherine Pearce had told Council that pursuant to the statement
of the Village Engineer, as recorded in the Minutes of Febr.17th relative to the
3/2/'64 :
2 Devco Petition for Rezoning, she had inspected plans and found nothing to show
any proposed extension of the BarrieeRoad storm drain to her property line.
220-UNIT APARTIENT PROPOSAL AT BROOKSIDE AVENUE AND MOTOR STREET 1.IEETS WITH
NEIGHBORHOOD OBJECTION: HEARING CONTINUED TO APRIL 6TH FOR TRAFFIC STUDIES.
Public Hearing was announced on the petition of Dietrich-Frances Co:, Inc., 4824
I4arkey Ridge , Minneapolis , for the rezoning from Open Development Dlstrict to "R-4
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT" Of BLOCKS TWENTY( 20) AND TWENTY-ONE (21) , EMMA ABBOTT
PARK, AND PART OF VACATED MINNEAPOLIS, ST.PAUL AND SUBURBAN RAILROAD UWT-OF-WAY",
this property being located, generally, between the North Village Limits and Motor
Street, and between Brookside Avenue and Cleveland Avenue extended North.
Affidavits of Publication of ,"Notice of Hearing" in Edina-Morningside Courier
February 20 and 27, of mailing, and of posting Notice, were presented, approved
as to form and ordered placed on file*
proposal in some detail, with the aid of Vu-Graph Slides, showing the area
proposed for rezdning, and the land use of the surrounding area. He resrted
that this is good, buildable land, that some of it is heavily wooded.
the attention of the Council to Blocks 17, 18 and 19, Emma Abbott Park, which
will be permanently set aside so that they cannot-be built upon, saying this
is one ofthe considerations which caused Planning Commission to recommend
favorably on the proposal.
the project ,
of about 220 one and two-bedroom units to include both townhouses and walk-up apart-
ments, with a peripheral road, access to on-site parking from this road, a series
of internal courts, outdoor recreational facilities including swimming pool,
wading pool, etc.
five stages, the first stage to comprise 32 town houses in the Northeast corner;
with 48 apartments to be built in each of the 2nd through the 5th stages.
Council was appraised of a petition in opposition to the proposal, bearing
signatures of some 50 neighboring Edina and St.Louis Park residents, filed with
Clerk this afternoon.
Ave. ;St .Louis Park, who inquired as to disposition of the additional traffic to
be engendered by such a large residential development,.and by someone who directed
a question to the Council abouf what would happen to Minnehaha Creek.
proposing some improvements this summer, to improve traffic in this area.
explained these proposed improvements--the re-routing of Brookside Avenue into
Interlachen Blvd. being one; and stated-that any '19 vement or changes to the
Creek would require a permit from the Conservation, IF vision of Haters. He added
the proposal does include some storage, where there is now periodic flooding, in
the Northeast corner of the area; that this will neither add nor detract from the
amount of water entering or leaving the site.
Idre Frank Novotny, 4425 Rutledge Avenue, and Hr. R. A. Schmitt, 4377 Thielen
Avenue, both expressed themselves as being much concerned about the traffic. Idr.
Schmitt sited W.44th Street, the narrow bridge over the creek, the bad corner at
44th and Brookside, all as reasons why the impact of increased traffic should be
thoroughly studied before Council gives consideration to allowing construction of
this large develop&; and the matter of traffic came up several times during
the ensuing discussion.
Ehs Charaes Bateson, Planner for the City of St.Louis Park, told Council
that for some time St.Louis Park has had Brookside Avenue projected right through
the center of the property proposed for the apartment, ending at either Motor St.
or W.44th Street, realizing of course, that should some development be proposed before its plans were fully formulated, there would have to be some changes in
the Park's thinking. As to this particular plan, Mr. Bateson stated the Park feels
it aligns itself satisfactorily with what now exists;.the buffer as shown on the .
plan 'is adequate and acceptable to the City.
the Village has no assurance that once this property is zoned it will be developed;
and suggested it would be a good thing to have title to Blocks 17, 18 and 19 before
balance is zoned, so that Edina and Park can develop as a joint park facility.
llr. William Bale-, 4380 Thielen Avenue, asked that Council not consider this
zoning request because residents have purchased property with understanding that
neighborhood will be one of single family residences, because of the enormous size
of the proposed apartment project, and because of the impact of traffic on this
residential neighborhood.
gentleman who expressed himself as a resident newly moved from Chicago, concurred
in Mr.. Bale's requesi.
Mr4 Dick Vogel, Attorney for*tie promotion asked if the traffic matter and
the zoning matter before the Council tonight are not two entirely unrelated problems.
Mr. Hite's answer was that he does not agree that these two matters are unrelated,
but does agree that the increase in traffic from this development will not be too
great and does not have much impact upon the traffic problem as it now exists. He added, at a question from the audience, that W.44th Street will have to be improved,
regardless of action taken on this development.
300 more trips per day would be generated from this multiple residence development
than from a single-fqily development; and Iilr. Hite stated he believes the improve-
Planning Director Hite explained the
He called
Mr. Hite introduced Mr. Leonard Parke rchitedht for $a who explained the proposed project , being a multiple-dwelling project
Mr. Parker added that it is proposed to develop the area in
,
.
-
Discussion was opened for the opposition by llrs. vonLorenz of 4332 Brookside
Planning Director Hite explained that with regard to traffic, the Village is
He
I
,
He added that he understands that
Nr, Ray Denison, 4500 Rutledge Avenue, and another
Mr. Bredesen said he felt some
ments proposed for this
greater extent than the
Council that 75% of the
23 3/2/64
year's work in this area will alleviate traffic to a
expected 300 trips per day.
access is from Brookside Avenue.
'+ t Mr. Parker reminded
3a 30 0 z U u
I
Mr. Vogel explained that owners feel that if they can't help Edina they
will be doing themselves no good; that this particular property is especially
suited to an apartment development because (1) it is buffered on one side by
the raieroad track, and (2) it can be landscaped and beautified-to receive this
type of development. He added that the owners will be contributing to Edina
insofar as the tax dollar is concerned, and that they will be bringing in fewer
children than would a single-family development.
Mr. Parker added that in presenting plans to Councils throughout the
metropolitan area he has found that the assumption of many persons is that
apartments are a blight on a residential neighborhood; that it is his considered
judgment that because of this development residential property in the area will
increase, rather than decrease, in value; that there is a valid concern about
traffic but would like to point out that the traffic problem is not related to
the people who live in the area.
There were other objections from the audience, one lady saying she much
disliked having the only "country" tract in the area used for apartments, and
a gentieman suggesting that the proposal is "just too large" and there should be
some way to agree upon a lesser plan.
and Mr. Dietrich, one of the developers, answered rather heatedly that the.
area of development (the Northeast corner for the first stage) is the idea of
the Village, rather than the developer, to assure that the beat property will
not be developed until last.
until he sees the results of some of the proposed traffic improvements suggested
by the Fillage this evening, he wishes Council would postpone action.
For the proponents, Mr. Vogel asked that Council vote on issue at this
meeting.
Trustee M acMillan, saying he feels that the traffic question has not been
completely answered, asked Engineer Hite if he could have a traffic report for
the Council within two weeks.
report in this short time; that, within four weeks he could have an estimate of
the change rerouting Brookside Avenue would make in the area trafific pattern- -
but that this is the very best he could do.
personally, believes traffic does have an affect on zoning, insofiar as safety
is concerned, Mr..Bredesen also suggested that traffic studies be made.
MacMillan then moved that Public Hearing be continued to April 6, to give
the Engineer time to make studies of present and projected traffic relative to
proposed traffic improvements and proposed apartment dwelling project.
Tupa stated that in deference to. the wishes of the residents, and in order to
get a better understanding of what is required for more efficient traffic pattern,
he would second Mr. MacMillan's mothion..
VanValkenburg suggested that Engineer's report include recommendation as to
provision for Sanitary Sewer and Water in this area.
There was some objection on the matter of lack of guaranty of development;
Mr. Schmitt said he feels that the developers' intentions are good, but that
Mr. Hite .replied that he could not have such a
Reporting to Mr. Vogel that he,
&.
Discussion was had on the motion: and
Motion unanimously carried.
COUNCIL DELAYS ACTION ON REZONING OF BERTELSON-RAUENHORST PROPERTIES PENDING
AGREEMENT ON PARK. Clerk presented Affidavits of Publication in Edina-Morningside
Courier February 20 and 27, 1964, of Posting, and of Mailing tca owners of affected
properties, a "Notice of Public Hearing It on the rezoning of the following described
properties :*
FROM OPEN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT -
1. The Proposed Bertelsen Plat, as follows:
&b.TO R-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT - Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lots 1
2.
a.TO R-3 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT - Lots 13 through 19, Block.2
through 12, Block 2. .f*
The proposed Rauenhorst Registered Land Survey, as follows:
a. TO R-3 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRZCT - Tract A.
b. TO R-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT - Tract B.
C.
d.
TO OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT - Tracts C, D, E, F and G.
TO PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT - Tracts H, I, J, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, S, T and U.
this area lying, generally, South of W.73rd St. and between France Ave. and
Highway LOO.
Affidavits were approved as to form and ordered placed on file; and pursuant thereto,
Public Hearing was held on these petitions, being by Minneapolis.Builders Supply Co.
for the Bertelson property; by.Rauenhorst Development Co. for the other tract.
Planning Director Hite told Council this plan, entitled "Plan C'l, has the Planning
Commission's favorable recommendation. With the aid of a drawing he explained the
pian in some detail, pointing out the proposed R-1 and R-2 Districts; and telling
Council this plan, revised a pumber of times, is for the rezoning of between 110
and 115 acres to a number of different zoning districts.
Mr. Harold A. Dickson, 7312 Eest Shore Drive, appearing on behalf of the South
Gardens Associations, inquired about R-5 zones; was informed that R-5 zoning is not
under consideration this evening; then asked concerning proposed park area in the
24 3/2/64
Bertelson Tract, and was informed by Mr. Hite that the matter of the park has
not yet been settled, andsthat the recommendation of the Planning Commission
for approval is contingent upon.the Park Board and Mr. Bertelson's arriving at
a satisfactory agreement on the additional park area.
comments from the floor, and none had been received prior to the Hearing.
Mayor Bredesen entertained a motion to continue Public Hearing until park
matter is settled, and VanValkenburg so moved.
carried.
company has several applications for permits pending and would like rezoning
now; that delay will work hardship on them.
had attempted to get in touch with Park Department today, but was unable to
do so-that be believes the matter can be worked out. Upon advice that Park
Board will meet next Nonday evening, VanValkenburg moved that Public Hearing
be continued to March 16
MGtiontGeconded by Rixe and carried.
There were no other
Motion seconded by Rixe and
Mr. Rauenhorst asked for re-consideration by Council, saying his
Mr. Bertelson told Council he
I smThBt -n'a%teT of taddition, to Park might. be settled. .
VARIANCES FROM SIDE YARD SETBACK REQUISMENTS OF ZONING ORDINANCE GRANTED AFTER
PUBLIC HEARINGS.
"Notices of Public Hearings" on the following petitions for variances from
Planning Director Hite presented Affidavits of Mailing of
side yard requirements of zoning ordinance;' and these affidavits were approved
as to form and ordered placed on file.
with Notice, and action was taken as hereinafter recorded:
to construct addition to home at rear of attached garage, eight feet from side
lot line (ordinance requires ten-foot side yard).
from the floor, and none had been received prior to Hearing.
had recommended favorably on request, as of January 15. VanValkenburg's motion
for approval of petition for variance, was seconded by Tupa and carried.
PETITION OF GENE BENNETT, 4901 BROWNDALE AVENUE - Petition for permit
to enclose present garage for use as porch and build new garage on NE side of
house, set back 20 ft. from Country Club Road, rather than 30 feet bequired by
Zoning Ordinance.
at its meeting of Pebruary 5.
had been received-prior to Public Hearing,
variance in accord with Planning Commission's recommendations, was seconded by
Tupa and carried.
Public Hearings were conducted in accord
1. PETITION OF E. E. SAMUELSON, 4503 W(EV1EIJ DRIVE - Petition for permit
There were no objections
Planning.Commission
* 2.
Planning Commission had recommended favorably on this request,
There were no objections from the floor, and none
VanValkenburg's motion, approving
I
TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEHENT NO. T-4 ORDERED AFTER PUBLIC HEARING.
Affidavit of Publication in Edina-Morningside Courier on February 20 and 27, 1964,
and Affidavits of Posting and of Mailing to owners of affected properties, a
"Notice of Public Hearing" on a proposed tree trimming improvement. These notices
contained a listing of several streets in the White Oaks" area, stating the
proposal was to trim trees along these boulevards.
Hyde explained that Notice is in error; that Bridge Lane is the only street where
it is proposed to trim boulevard trees.
4800 Block on Tomes Road, objecting to general improvement for reason that there
is not a sipgle boulevard tree in this block.
petition for Blvd. Tree Trimming had been for Bridge Lane; that action had been
taken to initiate public hearing for entire area before survey was made, and that
notices had been sent out to area before it became apparent that'only Bridge Lane
trees need trirmning.
was $10.00 per boulevard tree, and Manager Hyde added that the Village will probably
have this work done by our own force, rather than take bids.
Meadow Road, asked that his very large boulevard elm be included in the improvement,
saying he feels that an assessment of $25 or $30 would be reasonable for this
improvement.
clieck this tree &d make estimate for Mr. Duffy.
Mr. R. L. MacPhail, 2 Bridge Lane, and others on Bridge Lane, assenting to improve-
ment, and there were no dther objections offered.
following Resolution and moved its adoption:
Clerk presented
Mayor Bredesen and Efanager
Mm H. 0. Berg presented petition from
Manager Hyde told audience that
Estimate of Cost for the proposed improvement on Bridge Lane
Mr. W. H. Duffy, 4707
Manager Hyde told Council this could be arranged; that crew could
Mayor Bredesen read letter from
VanValkenburg offered the
RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. T-4
BE IT RESOLYED by the.Counci1 of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council
heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published on tne following proposed
improvement:
Maple Road from W.48th St. to W.50th St.; Townes Road from Sunnyside Rd. to W.49th
St. ;. Tomes Circ e; White Oaks Road; Meadow Road; I.1.48th St. from Maple Road to
France Ave.; W.4 il th St. from Maple Road to France Ave.; Bridge Lane
and at the hearing held at the time and-place specified in said notice the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully
advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the construction
of said improvement as follows:
TRIIIIMING BOULEVARD TREES IN THE FOLLOlJING STREETS, with bolting and cabling
where deemed necessary:
TRIMMING BOULEVARD TREES , with bolting and cabling where deemed necessary,
IN BRIDGE LANE AND AT 4707 MEADOW ROAD
that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent
25 3/2/64
therefor shall include all lots and tracts of land abutting Bridge Lane, and
4707 Meadow Road.
Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there
Mayor Bredesen was excused from the meeting at this time, and Mayor Pro Tem
VanValkenburg presided for the balance of the meeting.
THREZ SEVEN-GANG HYDRAULIC MOWERS PURCHASED FOR GOLF COURSE AND PARKS.
Hyde presented tabulation of bids taken today, together with the recommendation of
the Park Department for award, covering Three Seven-Gang Hydraulic Mowers.
two bids had been received;
$5,078.40 for Park Unit and $10,409.60 for 2 Golf Course Units-Total, $15,488.00;
and high bid of Minnesota Toro (Toro Mower) at $6,705.00 and $12,230.00 respectively,
with Total of $18,935.00.
for award of the Park Unit to Minnesota Tore; of the two Golf Course Units to R. L.
Gould *
recornended award is fair and would give all equipment-a good test.
for award in accord with Park Department recommendations.
Rixe and carried.
Manager
Only
the low bid of R. L. Gould (Jacobsen Mower) at
Park Department's recommendations dated this date were
After reatiew of the recommendations, Tupa stated he believes this
He then moved
Motion seconded by
CONTRACT FOR BUS TRANSPORTATION FOR SWIMMING INSTRUCTION AWARDED TO KOTTKE BUS
SERVICE, ANOKA.
Transportation for Swimming Instructions. Heretofore, this bus transportation has
been furnished by the Edina-Morningside School District, at 51C: per mile.
Hyde reported to Council that before taking these bids he had called Mr, Don Pryor
of the School District and informed him of the Village's intentions, and had been
told to go ahead--that the District could furnish buses at no lower a rate than
that of last year.
Service, Anoka, which serves the Anoka Schools, at $.35 per Mile or $4.75 per Hr.
for 48-Passenger Bus, and $.40 per Mile or $5.00 per Hour for a 54-Passenger Bus,
being the low bid.
$5.75 per Hr. for a 54-Passenger Bus.
Hr., respectively; and Colubia Transit was high bidder with $.31 per Mi. plus $2.00
per Hr., and $.32 per Ni., and $2.00 per hr., respectively.
was for award of contract to Kottke Bus Service, Anoka, at $.35 and s.40 per mile,
depending on size of bus needed; he infomed Council that on the basis of the low
bid the Village should save some $2,000 over what was paid to School District
last year.
in accordance with Manager's recommendation, was seconded by HacMillan and carried.
"PETITION" FOR SANITARY SEWER AND WATER TO SERVE 5717 HIGHWAY NO. 169 REFERRED
TO VILLAGE ENGINEER FOR PROGRAMMING. Manager Hyde recommended that the letter
received from Mr. Elmer F. Eike, 5717 Highway 169, asking for Sanitary Sewer and
Water, be treated as a petition and refetred to the Village Engineer for programming.
He added that this is a difficult situation because serving Mr. Eike's property
will mean tunneling under the Highway.
and referral to Village Engineer was seconded by Rixe and carried.
PETITIQN FOR WATERMAIN IN WOODCREST DRIVE ACCEPTED.
Woodcrest Drive from Park Place to 5500 Noodcrest Drive was filed, reviewed, and
by motion Rixe seconded by MacMillan and carried was accepted and referred to the
Village Engineer for programming.
'Pro Tem
Manager Hyde presented Tabulation of bids taken today on Bus
Mr.
Tabulation showed receipt of four bids, that of Kottke Bus
Bloomington Bus Company was second-low at $.48 per Mi. or
Richfield Bus Company bid $.55 and $.60 per
Mr. Hyde's recommendation
Tupa's motion, that contracr be awarded to Kottke Bus Service, Inc.,
I..
Tupa's motion for acceptance of petition
Petition for Watermain in
RESIGNATION OF MR. PAUL FOSS FROM PARK BOARD ACCEPTED WITH REGRET. Mayor/accepted
with regret the resignation of Mr. Paul Foss from the Park Board. tendered because - of ill health.
U. OF Ma CIVIL DEFENSE CLASSES TO BE HELD MARCH 12TH FOR MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS.
Announcement was made of these classes, to be held at Prudential Building, with -- invitation to all municipal officials to attend.
PETITION FOR VACATION OF UNNAMED STREET BETWEEN LEE VALLEY CIRCLE AND SOUTH LINE
OF CAROLANE ADDITION TO HAVE PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 6.
filed February 28, for Vacation of an Unnamed Street lying between Lee Valley Circle
Clerk presented petition
--
and the South line of Carolane Addition.
wes no longer any need for the street, and recommended Public Hearing on petition.
MacMillan's motion, setting date of Public Hearing on Petition as April 6, was
seconded by Tupa and carried.
Planning Director Hite told Council there
26 .. 1 3/2/64
COUNCIL TAKES ACTION BY RESOLUTION TO EFFECT TRADE OF PARK LANDS. Clerk reported
that Village Attorneys desire Council to formalize action taken recently with regard
to trade of park lands and acquisition of certain other lands for park (See Council
action of December 2, 1963, Page 257, Book 26, and action of January 20, 1964, Page
289, Book 261, as an aid to Court procedure.
Resolution and moved its adoption:
MacMillan offered the following
- RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it is necessary, advisable and in the public interest that the
Village of Edina acquire certain land situated in the Village of Edina for public
park purposes, said property being described as follows, to-wit:
Lot 3 and 4, Block 1, The Heights Third Addition, according to the plat
thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles
in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
.
-I WHEREAS, in order to acquire said property the Village of Edina has
entered into.that certain contract providing for an action to be brought by Roycar,
Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, at the expense of the Village to release from the
restriction that it be used for park purposes the property situated in the Village
of Edina and described as follows, to-wit:
That part of the tract of land designated.as PARK in the duly recorded.
plat of THE EIGHTS, lying Westerly of a line 60 feet Easterly of and
parallel with the following described line: Beginning at a point on -. the South line of said PARK, distant 154.72 feet East of the Southwest
corner thereof; thence Northeasterly to a point on the North line of
said PARK, ,distant 182.67 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof
and there terminating, according to the map or plat thereof on file
and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Henne-
pin County, bSinnesota.
.
WHEREAS, a copy of said contract is attached hereto and made a part of
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Village of Edina proceed to procure
this resolution.
the above firet-mentioned lands pursuant to the terms of the aforementioned contract
for the purpose hereinbefore set forth, and that the aforementioned contract be and
is hereby approved, and that the execution thereof by the Village on February 5, 1964
is hereby ratified, and that the Village Mayor and Manager be instructed and directed
to execute all other documents, do all other acts necessary or desirable to be executed
and done to fully perform and carry out the covenants and agreements of The Village
contained in said contract, except execute deeds to be given pursuant to said contract,
and said Hayor and the Village Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and
deliver all deeds to be given pursuant to said.contract.
Motion for adoption- of the Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there
were four ayes and no nays, as follows: Ma
kenburg, aye; and the Resolution was adop
And Macfilillan offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, a portion of the plat of The Heights, located in the Village of
Edina, has been dedicated to the public for park purposes and is presently heid by
the Village of Edina-for such purposes, said portion being described as follows, to-
wit : according
which dedicated, and it is deemed to be in the public interest that all present or
future plans or intents for such use be abandoned and that said unfit portion be
permitted to revert to the former owners thereof freed from said dedication, said
unfit portion being more particularly described as follows, to-wit:
PARK, in The'Heightsho the recorded plat thereof.
WHEREAS, a certain portion of said park is ddemed unfit for the purpose for '
That part of the tract of land designated as PARK in the duly recorded plat
of THE HEIGH'IS, lying Westerly of a line 60 feet Easterly of and parallel
with the foUowing described line:
of said PARK distant 154.72 feet East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence
Northaasterly to a point on the North line of said PARK, distant 182.67. feet.
East of the Northwest corner thereof and there terminating, according to the
map or plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of
Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Beginning at a point on the South line
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by' the Village Council of the Village of Edina
that the above described unfit portion of park property be abandoned as a park; and
that the mayor of the Village and Village Clerk, be authorized and directed to execute
and deliver a Quit Claim Deed releasing said lands to the person or persons adjudged
entitled thereto, upon the filing with the Village Clerk of a certified copy of a
Decree vacating said portion of said plat, and releasing said dedication, pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes Section 505.14.
1
27 3/2/64
Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there
were four ayes and no nays, as followsi MacMillan, aye; fixe, aye; Tupa, aye; and \
NEW AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE NECESSd FOR'STATE AID BONDS.
Council Finance Director Dalen's report that $100,000 State Aid Bonds due June 15,
1965 will be called by Edina June 15, 1964; that the State has been notified of
this prior call and now requires a new Amorfization Schedule, adopted by Council
Resolution.
Manager Hyde read to
Tupa offered the following 'Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
,AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE FOR
STATE AID BONDS
WHEREAS, the Village of Edina has issued bonds in the amount of $394,594.12
exclusively for the purpose of establishing, locating, relocating, constructing,
reconstructing or improving its State-Aih Highways or Streets in accordance with
law, and
said obligations are payable, that amount of their €uture State-Aid allotments
as is permissible by law and needed to pay the principal and interest thereon,
which principal payment Shall be made from the construction account of such State-
Aid Fund and the interest payments made from theip regular State-Aid Maintenance
allotment, as detailed herein:
WHEREAS, said Village has irrevocably pledged to the sinking fund from which
- Principal Due Interest Due (2-1/2%)
Fund Fund
Year From State Aid Construction From State Aid' Maintenance
12-15-6 4 $2,500.00
-
6-15-65
' 6-15-66
12-15-6 6
6-15-6 7
12-15-65 ..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
hereby requested to keep a
2,500 00
2,500.00
$100,000.00 2,500 00
1,250 . 00
100,000.00 1,250 6 00
RESOLVED: That the Commissioner of Highways be and is ,
bond record in his office for the Village of Edina.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Commissioner of Highways be and is hereby
requested upon receipt of this resolution to annually certify to the State Auditor
the sum of money required for the principal and interest on said bonds, as evidenced
by detailed reports of the annual expenditures.
Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Iiixe, and on Rollcall there
Manager Hyde reported that the Planning Comission's recommendations are now in
the hands of the Village Attorneys (Mr. Schwartzbauer) for draft into legal
terminelogy; won't be ready for Council consideration for at least a month.
COUNCIL TO HOLD PUBLIC HEARING APRIL 6, ON PROPOSED REZONING FRO14 "COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT'' TO "PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT1'. Planning Director Hite recommended
that Council conduct a Public Hearing in the near future on a proposed rezoning
from "Commercial District*1 to "Planned Industrial District!' of the area once '
zoned for Western Meats--llThat part of the'East 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, lying South of W.78th St."
Motion by MacMillan, setting date for Public Hearing on proposed Rezoning, was
seconded by Rixe and carried, Hearing Date being Monday, April 6.
HEARING TO &-CLASSIFY MULTIPLE RESIDENCE PROPERTIES SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 6.
multiple residence areas under the new Mugtiple Residence Ordinance, and Tupa
moved for Public Hearing on April 6.
~ Mr. Hite recommended that Council conduct a Public Hearing to re-classify certain
Motion seconded by MacMillan and carried.
PARK PROPERTY PURCHASES RATIFIED' BY COUNCIL.
there is nothing in the Council Minutes formaliy authorizing burchase of Lot 2,
Manager Hyde informed Council that
Block 1, Niederloh Addition, although he knows this matter was discussed with
the Council (See Park Board Minutes of November 12, 1963) .
ratify purchase of this property as per purchase agreement dated November 21,
1963, for $6,000, and payment of $404.70 in special assessments.
He asked that Council
He also requested confirmation of purchase of Lot 2, Block 13, Cleveland's
3/2/64
Subdivision of Emma Abbott Park for $1,450.00 (See Mdnutes of Park Board Meeting
of January 13, 1964.)
land hereinbefore discussed, wds seconded by Tupa and carried.
MacMillan's motion, confirming purchase of two tracts of
MARCH 16TKJTO BE DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON STREET IMPROVEMENTS: NEW METHOD OF
ASSESSNENT FOR COST OF IMPROVEMENT OF CROSS STREETS DISCUSSED.
to the Council on several proposed street improvements which should be done this
t5r. Hite reported
year, including a number of cross-streets, situated in areas where residential
streets have already been improved.
of the Village cross-streets are improved as a part of an over-all area improvement
and abutting properties are assessed for only one-third of their footage, with the
balance of the cost being spread against the entire area
Council consideration a formula for assessment of those/b%s proposed for
improvement this year, this formula being as follows:
Reminding Council that in the newer sections
Mr. Hite presented for
1. Assessment on a per foot basis for 1/3 of the footage of abutting
* 2. Assessment of/*ke-Ba&aaee-of the cost over all benefited lots in an ,
properties. a part
area, including
incentive to having these streets improved, and in lieu of heavy
maintenance costs.
abutting properties, at $90 per lot.
Payment of the balance of the cost by the Village General Fund, as an 3.
There was some considerable discussion by the Council on Mr. Hite's recommendation,
and Tupa offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLId HEARINGS
PROPOSED STkEET SURFACING AND CURB AND
GUTTER IMPROVElIIENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina:
1. The Village Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report
as to the feasibility of the proposed STREET IMPROVEUENTS described in the Form -of
Notice of Hearings set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements,
said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the
Village Clerk.
Village Hall', to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said proposeii improvement .
and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for
two'successive weeks, the second of which publications is to be not less than three
days from date of said meeting, which notice shall be in substantially the following
form:
2. This Council shall meet on Mondayblarch 16, 1964, at 7:OO P.M., in the Edina
The' Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place 3.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
* PERNANENT STREET SURFACING
AND
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
HDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL will meet at the Edina Village Hall on Monday, March 16,
1964, at 7:OO p.m., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed
under-the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chapter 429. The approximate
cost of said improvements is estimated by the Village as set forth below: - - - ESTIMATED COST
A. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREETS SURFACING IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. Ashcroft.Ave. from Valley View Rd, to W.6Oth St. $ 5,550.44
2. William Ave. from W.5lst St. to W.52nd St. $ 13, 620.50
B. 'CONSTRUCTION OF PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN
THE FOLLOWING:
A< Concrd Ave. from Southview Lane to W.6Oth St. $ 13,430.55
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING:
C. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND PORTLAND CENENT
1. Oxford Ave. from W.5lst St, south to cul-de-sac
William Ave, from W.5lst St. to Interlachen Blvd.
jankerson Ave. from W.52nd St. to Interlachen Blvd. $ 43,453.11
2. Merold Drive from Grove St. to Wycliffe Rd. $ 19,027.69
'3. Dubiin Circle from W.70th St. to end of cul-de-sac $ .8,665.19
4. West Shore Drive from Hwy.#lOO to Hibiscus Ave.
hibiscus Ave. from West Shore Dr. to Kellogg Ave.
ikeilogg Ave. from north line of Lke Edina 4th Addn.
$?dum Lane from Kellogg Ave. to West Shore Dr.
Poppy Lane from West Shore Drive to east service lane
' to South line of Lake Edina 4th Addn.
of Hwy.#100 $ 100,931.25
5. StXohns Ave. from Valley View Rd. to W.6Oth St. $ 15,278.76
6. Stuart Ave. from Grove St. to 60' South of center
line of Benton Ave.
,Benton'Ave. from Stuwt Ave. to Tracy Ave. $ 22,032.87
,
. 3/2/64 29
. 7. View .Lane from Highway #169 to Schaefer Rd.
I Schaefer Rd, from View Lane to Stauder Circle
Stauder Circle from Schaefer Rd. to north line of Parkwood Knolls 12th Addn. $. 64,385.76 J
8. Richmond Lane from Richmond Ave. to Windsor Ave. . $ 4,331.57
9. 15,087.45
10. 'West 62nd St. from €wing Ave. to Abbott Ave. $ 37,150.87
11. Beard Place from W.62nd St. to Beard Ave. . $ 22,659..55
12. W.59th St. from Concord Ave. to Oaklawn Ave.
,Rosemary Lane from Valley View Rd. to end of cul-de-sac $
Beard Ave. from N.62nd St. to Cross-Town Hwy.
W.6Oth St, from Concord Ave. to Wooddale Ave.
W.6lst St. from Wooddale Ave. to Brookview Ave. $ 72,503.30
13. W.5lst St. from Oxford Ave. to Hankerson Ave. $ 15,782.37
L.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
under A-1 above includes Lots 1 thru 7 incl.,.and lot 9, Block 1, Valley View Terrace
2nd Addn.; and Lots 1 thru 7 incl, Block 2, Valley View Terrace 2nd Addn,
under A-2 above includes Lots 1 thru 12 incl., Block 8, and Lots 13 thru 24 incl.,
Block 9, Brookside Heights Addn.
under B-1 above includes Lots 1, 2 and 3, B1ock 1, Stocke E Hanson's Concord Terrace;
Lots 13, 14 and 15, Block 1, Concord Grove; Lots 13 thru 24, incl., Block 8, Fairfax
Addn,; Lots 13 thru 24 incl., Block 9, Fairfax Addn.; Lots 1 and 2, South.Concord
Addn.; Parcels #7630, 4910, 5000, 5200 and 5600, all in Sec. 19, Twp.28, Range 24.
under C-1 above includes Lots 2 thru 20, incl., Block 1, Brookside Heights; Lot 1 and
Lots 5 thru 23 incl., Block 2, Brookside Heights; Lot 1 and Lots 6 thru 14 incl.,
Block 3, Brookside Heights; Lots 1 thru 8 incl, Block 6, Brookside Heights; Lots 17
'thru 24 incl., Block 7, Brookside Heights; Lots lthru 12 incl., Block 9, Brookside
Heights.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
under C-2 above includes Lots 1 thru 13 incl., Block 2, Edina Highlands.Lakeside
Addn.; Lot 1 and Lots 16 thru 24 incl., Block 3, Edina Highlands Lakeside Addn.
under C-3 above includes Lots lthru 8 incl., Block 1, Dublin Circle.
under C-4 above includes Lots 1 thru 21 incl., Block 1, Lots 1 thru 12, incl.,
Block 2, Lots 1 thru 13 incl., Block 3, Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 4, all in Lake
Edina 3rd Addn.; Lots 1 thru 9 incl., Block 1, Lots 1 thru 13 incl., Block 2, Lots 1
thru 7 incl,, Block 3, Lots 1 thru 8 incl., Block 4, all in Lake Edina 4th Addn.;
Reg. Land Survey #679 (Tract A) S1/2 of Sec. 31, T.28, R.21.
under C-5 above includes a Lots 1 thru 9 incl., Block 1, Valley View Terrace 3rd
Addn.; Lots 1 thru 8 incl., Block 2, Valley View Terrace 3rd Addn.
under C-6 above includes Lot 4, Block 3, Broadmore Addn.; Lots 1 thru 4 incl.,
Block 1, Broadmore Addn. Eliason Replat; Lot 1, Block 1, J.E. Danielson's Addn.;
Lots 8 thru 11 incl., Block 1, Broadmore Addn.; Lots 7 thru 9 incl., Block 1,
Broadmore Addn. 2nd Replat; Lots 1 thru 5 incl., Block 2, Broadmore Addn. 8
under C-7 above includes Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 11th Addn.;
Lots 1 thru 6 incl., Block 2, Lots 1 th*u 8 incl., Block 3, Lots 1 thru 6 incl.,
Block 4, all in Parkwood Knolls llth Adan.; Lots 1 and 9, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls
8th Addn.; Parcel 2740, South line of Parkwood Knolls 12th Addn., N1/2 of Sec. 31,
T.117,R.21; Outlot 1, Parkwood Knolls llth Addn.
uncer C-8 above includes Lots 1 and 16, Block 2, Lots 5 and 6, Block 3, Richmond
Hills Addn.
under C-9 above includes Lots 1 thru 9 incl., Block 1, and Lots 1 thru .4 incl.,
Block 2, Valley Vista Addn.
under C-10 above includes Lots 1 thru 7 incl., Block 3, Lots 3 thru 22 incl., Block 2,
Lots 2 thru 8 incl., Block 3; Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 4, all in Edina Bel-Air 5th
Addn.; Lot 1 and 2, Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 3, all in Edina Bel-Air 6th Addn.; Lot
1, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 1, Lhad Addn.; Lot 1, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 4 incl.,
Block 3, Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 4, all in Fanners 2nd Addn.; Lots 1 thru 6 incl.,
Block 2, Lots 1 thru 6 incl., Block 3, and Lots 1 thru 5 incl., Block 4, all in
Erickson's Addn.; Lots 1 thru 4 incl,, Block l., and Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 2,
Katter's Addn.; Lots 1 thru 8 incl., Block 2, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, all in
Evans Addn.; Lots 2 thru 9 incl., Holts 2nd Addn. to Edina; Lots 9 thru 24 incl.,
Block 3, and Lots 9 thru 16 incl., Block 4, Town Realty's Edina Terrace;-Parcels
#3610, 3620 and 6410, in Sec. 29, T.28, R.24.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvemant
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area prop,osed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be*assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
3/2/64
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
under C-ll above includes Lots 1, 5, 6 and 7, Block 1, and Lots 5 thru 12.incl.,
Block 2, all in Edina Bel-Air 5th Division; Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Farmer's 2nd
Addn,; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 3, Erickson Addn.; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 4,
Ericksoa Addn.; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Katters Addn.; Parcels #3610, and 3175,
Sec. 29, T.28, R.24; Outlot #4, Katters.Addn. -
under.C-12 above includes Lots 7 thru 18 incl., Block 3, Lots 7 thru 18 incl.,'
Block 4, Lots 7 thru 18 incl.,.Block 5, Lots.7 thru 18 incl., Block 6, Lots 7
thru 18 incl., Block 7, Lots 7 thru 18 incl.,.Block 89 Lots l.thru 24 incl.,
Block 9, Lots 1 thru 24 incl., Block 10, Lots 1 thru 24 incl., Block 11, Lots 1
thru 24 incl., Block 12, Lots 1 thru 6 incl., and Lots 19 thru 24 incl., Block
13; Lots 1 thru 6 incl. and Lots 19 thru'24 incl, Block 14,Lots 10 thru 15 incl.,
Block"18, Lots 7 thru 18 incl., Block 19, Lots 7 thru 18 incl., Block.20,+Lots 1
thru 16 incl., Block 21, Lots 1 thru 22 incl,, Block 22, Lots 1 thru 24 incl.,
Block 23, and Lots 13 thru 24 incl.,.Block 24, all in Fairfax Addition; Lots 1
thru 13.incl., Block 1, Lots 1 thru 8 incl., Block 2, all in Valley View Terrace
Addn.; Lots 1 thru 8 incl., Block 1, Lots lthru 7 incl., Block 2, all in Valley
,View Terrace 3rd Addn.; Lots 1thru.7 incl., Block 1, Valley View Terrace 2nd
Addn.; Lots 1 thru 16 incl., Block 2, Valley View Terrace 2nd Addn.
under C-13 above includes Lots 9 thru 20 incl., Block 2, Lots 9 thru 20 incl.,
Block 3; Lots 9 thru 20 incl., Block 4, Lots 6 thru 11 incl., Block 5, Lots 1 thru
7 incl., Block 6, Lots 1 thru 6 incl., and Lots 18 thru 24 incl. , Block 7 , Lots 1
. thru 6 incl,, and Lots 19 thru 24 incl., Block 8, Lots 1 thru 6 incl., and Lots 19
thru 24 incL., Block 9, all in Brookside Heights Addn.
e "9.0
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Improvement
GRETCHEN Sa ALDEN
Village Clerk
MacM
Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by MacMillan, and on Rollcall
there were four ayes and no nays, as follows:
and VanValkenburg, aye; and the Resolution
Mr..George Hite told Council plans and specifications are prepared for Sanitary
Trunk Sewer No. C-2; that bids should be taken just-as soon as possible in order
that work might be expedited.
MacMillan offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
Aeer some reviewe and discussion by Council, . . .RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR *
PROPOSED SANITARY TRUNK SEWER NO. C-2 (IbIPROVEMENT
NO. 210) AND DIRECTING ADmRTISEklENT FOR BIDS ,
BE IT RESOLVED.by the Village Council of the Village of Edina:
I. The plans and specifications for the proposed SANITARY TRUNK SENER C-2
(SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEWNT NO. 210) set forth in the following Advertisement for
Bids form, heretofore.prepared by the Village Engineer and now on file in the office.
of the Villagq Clerk are hereby approved.
2.. The Clerk shall cause to be published twice in the Edina-Morningside Courier
and the Construction Bulletin the following notice for bids for said improvements: - \ ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
SANITARY TRUNK SEWER .. "C-2"
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the office of the Village Manager in the
Edina Village Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, at 11:OO a.m., Friday, April-3, 1964, and.
the Edina Village Council will meet at 7:OO p.m. on Monday, April 6, 1964, to con-
sider said bids being for the following work
CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE "C-2" TRUNK SANITARY SENER, LATERAL-CONNECTIQIVS
THERETO, AND APPURTENANCES ALONG THE FOLLOrJING DESCRIBED LINE: *
Beginning at a point in the west right-of-way line of State Highway 100, said point
beipg 834.79 feet north, as measured along said west right-of-way line, fmmthe
south line of the N l/2 of Sec. 9, T. 116, R. 2l;thence west along a line drawn
parallel to and measured 834.79 feet north, measured at right angles from the south
line of the N 11'2 of said Sec. 9 to its intersection with a line drawn parallel to
and measured 7.5 feet east, at right angles, from the west line of the east 1/2 of
said Sec. 9; thence south along the last mentioned parallel line to its intersection
with a line drawn parallel to and'measured 389 feet south, at right angles, from
the north line of the S 1/2 of said Sec. 9; thence west along the last mentioned
parallel line to a point 350 feet west, as measured a-long said parallel line, from
the east l&ne of Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21; thence along a line deflecting to the right
at an angle of 32*-48', to the intersection ofusaid line with a line drawn parallel
to and measured 50 feet south, at right angles from the north line of the S 1/2 of
said Sec. 8; thence west along the last mentioned parallel line to its intersection
with the west right-of-way line on the M. N. E S. Railroad right-of-way; thence
northwesterly to the intersection of the centerline of Dewey Hill Road and Cahill
Road; thence west along the centerline of Dewey Hill Road to the east line of Sec. 7,
I
38 3/2/64
T.116, R. 21; thence north along said east line a distance 865 feet; thence
deflecting to the left at an angle of 89O-41' 39" a distance 810 feet; thence
deflecting to the right at an angle.of 32O a distance of 470 feet; thence along
line drawn parallel to and measured 30 feet north, at right angles, from the
north line of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of Sec. 7, T. 116, R. 21; thence west along
the last mentioned parallel line a distance of 190 feet; thence deflecting to &he
right at an angle of 70° a distance of 280 feet; thence deflecting to the left at
an angle of 96O a distance of 150 feet; thence deflecting to the right at an
angle of 20° to the centerline of Valley View Road; thence westerly along the
centerline of Valley View Road to the west line of the E 1/2 of the I? 1/2 of
Sec. 7, T. 116, R. 21; thence north along said west line and continuing north
along the west line of the E 1/2 of the W 1/2 of Sec. 6, T. 116, R.21to the
north line of the SW 1/4 of the SUl/4 of said Sec. 6; thence west along said
north line to the east right-of-way line of County Road No. 18; thence north
along the last mentioned east right-of-way line to the centerline of Valley View
Road and there terminating.
The bids must be submitted on the proposal forms provided in accordance with
contract documents, plans and specifications as prepared by Orr-Schelen-Mayeron E
Associates, Inc., Consulting Engineers, 1104 Currie Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55403, which are on file with the Village Clerk of Edina and may be seen at the
office of the Consulting Engineers.
Copies of Proposal Forms, plans and specifications for use by Contractors
submitting a bid may be obtained from the Consulting Engineers upon deposit of
$25.00 per set. This deposit will be returned to Contractors who submit a
bonafide bid and who return the plans and specifications in good condition
within fifteen (15) days after the opening of bids. One half of the amount of
the deposit will be refunded for each of all other sets of documents so returned.
No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the Village Clerk
of Edina and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or cerfified
check payable to the Clerk of the Village of Edina, for ten (10%) per cent of the
amount bid to be forfeited as liquidated damages in the event that the bid be
accepted and the bidder shall fail tO enter promptly into a written contract and
furnish the required bond.
a line deflecting to the right 'an angle of 7O030'. to its intersection with a 1
THE VILLAGE OF EDINA RESERVES THE RIGHT TO RJECT ANY AND ALL BIDS.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL.
GRETCHEN Sa ALDEN
Village Clerk
3.
hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of award of the contract for said
improvement.
Each and a11 of the terms of the foregoing advertisement,for bids are
Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there
were four ayes and no nays, as follows: . MacMillan,
and VanValkenburg, aye; and the Resoluti
CLAIMS PAiD.
dated this date, and confirming payment February 24 to Texaco, Inc,, amount $1,344.49
for Gasoline-General Fund:
General Fund, $12,192.07; Construction Fund, $152.00.; Park, Park Const. &
Golf Course Fund, $12,247.54; Waterworks Fund, $17,255.84; Liquor Fund, $28,773,37;
Sewer Rental Fund, $529.68; Improvement Funds, $1,054.93--TOTALI $72,205.43.
Tupa moved for paymen he following Claims as per Pre-List
Motion seconded by MacMillan and carried.
The evening's agenda's having been wvered, MacMillan moved for adjournment.
seconded by Rixe and carried.
Motion
Adjournment