HomeMy WebLinkAbout19640316_regular3/16/64
L.
IXCNUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA
VILLAGE COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY, ljlARCH 16, 1964, i AT 7:oo P.M., AT EDINA VILLAGE HALL
Members answering Rollcall were Macbiillan, Rixe, Tupa, VanValkenburg and Bredesen.
MINUTES ofthe Regular Meeting of March 2, 1964, were approved as submitted, by
motion BacNillan, seconded by VanValkenburg and carried,
JAE-ES L'IcNELLIS, ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF, was recognized by Mayor Bredesen on behalf
of the Council, for his completion of the 'International City Nanagers Associatian
course in Municipal Fire Administration.
complete this course.
He is the first of the Firemen to
COUNCIL CONGRATULATES EDINA-MORNINGSIDE HIGHSCHOOL BASKETBALL TEAN, AND GRANTS
"UNOFFICIAL" LEGAL HOLIDAY FROM THURSDAY , MARCH 19 THROUGH SUNDAY, MARCH 22
VanValkenburg's motion, for adoption of the following Resolution, and recommending
that Edina-ites observe an "unofficial"lega1 Holiday from Thunsday, March 19 (the
beginning of the State Basketball Tournament) through Sunday, March. 22, was
enthusiastically seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no
nays, as follows:
Bredesen, aye; and this Resolution was adopted:
Macblillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, aye; VanValkenburg, aye; and
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the 1963-1964 Basketball Team of EDINA-MORNINGSIDE HIGH SCHOOL,
located in the Village of Edina, has brought outstanding success in the field of
sports to its School and its Village by winning the LAKE CONFERENCE, the DISTRICT
NO, 18, and the REGION NO. 5 BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS; and
TrnRE;AS, as winner of Region No. 5 Championship, the ttHornets'l will enter the
MINNESOTA STATE BASKETBALL TOUIUWENT on Thursday, March 19, 1964:
NOW, THEREFORE;, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council ofthe Village of Edina
that this Council congratulate the BASKETBALL TEAM OF EDINA-MORNINGSIDE HIGH SCHOOL
and Coach Duane Baglien on the fine athletic and sportsmanship record made to this
date; and
.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Council appraise the BASKETBALL TEA14 OF EDINA-
IiloRNINGSJDE HIGH SCHOOL and Coach Baglien of its
will go on to win the MINNESOTA STATE HIGH SCHOO
that this fine team
CHAMPIONSHIP.
COUNCIL REZONES BERTELSON-RAUENHORST PROPERTIES AFTER AGREEMENT ON PARK.
Bredesen announced continuation of the March 2nd Public Hearing on the petition of
Bertelsen-Rauenhorst interests for rezoning of certain properties (all as recorded
in the Minutes of March 2, 1964, Page 23, this Minute Book).
Park Land for seven additional dwelling units in the approximately 15 acres of R-4
Multiple Residence District situated adjacent to park, were reviewed, and Village
Manager Hyde reported the Park Board has now accepted this recommendation, as of
March 9, the * Board's recommendation reading as follows : tl---tlr .- Crinkley moved that
we accept Mr. Beqtelsen's dedication of two acres and the additional seven acres for
a total of nine acres to be added to our present eleven-acre park.
seconded and motion carried." The Council had continued.Hearing for the settlement
of the park dedication mattez, and inasmuch as there wereeno comments from the €loor,
and no objections had been received prior to the Hearing, VanValkenburg offered the
following Ordinance, moving that Council dispense with second reading thereof and
adopt Ordinance as submitted: f
Nayor
Planning Commission
-recommendations of larch 4th, that Elr. Bertelsen's offer to trade seven acres of
Dr. Jackson
ORDINANCE NO. 261-81
AN' .ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261
(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA
ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICTS:
OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT: PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT.
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
(Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordinances of the Village
of Edina, is hereby amended by adding the following subparagraphs:
Section 1. Paragraph l,\Multiple Resience District Boundaries, of Section 4
District R-3 :
I I "(3) Lots 13 through 19, Block 2, and Tract A, all in accordance with the
Preliminary Plan entitled "Preliminary Plan for Bertelson and Rauenhorstl'
and dated January, 1964, on file in office of Edina Village Clerk."
"(4) Lots 1 and 2, Block I, Lots 1 through 12, Block 2, and Tract B, all in
. District R-4:
accordance with the Preliminary Plan entitled "Preliminary Plan for Bertelson
and Rauenhorst" and dated January, 1964, on file in office of Edina Village
Clerk .
3/16/64
Section 2. Paragraph 1, Boundaries of Office Building District, of
Section 10 (Office Building District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordinances ) 5 of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding after
sub-paragraph (9) of said Paragraph 1, the following:
"(h) Tracts C, D, E, F and G, all in accordance with the Preliminary
Plan entitled "Preliminary Plan for Bertelson and Rauenhorstfl
and dated January, 1964, on file in office of Edina Village Clerk."
Section 3. Parsgraph 2, Boundaries of Planned Industrial District, of
Section 11, (Planned Industrial District) of Ordinance No, 261 of revised
ordinances of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding after sub-paragraph (f) of said Paragraph 2, the following subparagraph: , "(9) Tracts, H. I. J, K, L, $1, N, P, Q, R, S, T and U, all .in accordance
with the Preliminary Plan entitled "Preliminary Plan for Bertelson and
Rauenhorst" and dated January, 1964, on file in office of Edina Village
Clerk. l1
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage and publication according to law.
Motion for waiver of second reading and for adoption of Ordinance as submitted
was seconded by MacMillan, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as
and the Resolution was adopted,
PERMISSION GRANTED SFOR EDINA-MORNINGSIDE HIGH SCHOOL BANNER OVER Wm50TH STREET.
One of the members of the High School Student Council appeared before the Council
to request permission for installation of a banner over M.50th Street in the.
France-50th St. business district.
Council, with promise of help in installation by Fire Department if needed.
for STATE HIGH SCHOOL BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT MARCH 19, 20 AND 21.
Permission enthusiastically granted by
Banner
PROPOSED -REZONING OF PART OF NELSON FARM MEETS WITH OPPOSITION; HEARING CONTINUED
FOR TWO WEEKS FOR FIELD INSPECTION BY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION. Clerk
presented Affidavits of Publication, Posting and Mailing of "Notice of Public '
Hearing on Petition for Rezoning-Portion of Nelson Farm", which affidavits were
approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due. notice given,
Public Hearing was called on the petition of Metro-U.S. Construction Company
for the rezoning of certain portions of the Nelson Farm (lying West of Highway
100 and South of W.74th Street) to R-4 MULTIPLE .RESIDENCE DISTRICT, OFFICE BUILDING
DISTRICT, AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, the tracts petitioned for rezoning
being described in detail in the
published notice being in Edina-Morningside Courier March 5 and 12, 1964.
overlays, Planning Director Hite explained to Council and audience the present
zoning on Nelson Farm, the present zoning of the surrounding area, and the
proposed zoning on Nelson Farm as compared with present zoning.
also showed road plan.
were reviewed.
be expected to happen to the property to the North, if this proposed rezoning is
approved; that it is only fair to say that the same kind of zoning (being Office
Building, Multiple Residence, and Planned Industrial) could be expected as far
North as Nine-Mile Creek.
happen, but is a reasonable extension of this present proposal,
directly adjacent to Nelson Farm on the North, complained that the road'plan as
now shown shows no 'lW.74th Street"; that what the developers of the Nelson Farm
are doing is to so plat their streets as to give completely inadequate.access to
his clients property, thus causing "diminution of property". is '
proposed Zoning of the property and not the road pattern. He added as a matter of
information that the "Ring 40 acres" about which Mr. Sachs has been speaking has
not had access to Highway LOO prior to this time, and that it has been the general
policy of the Village that where joint land owners cannot get together on joint
access, the plat with some access is accepted.
the Ring interests are not interested in paying at this time for development of
joint access from Highway #loo.
share of whatever "W.74th Street" costs; that he will be glad to put this into
writing.
south is not expected to be the only access to the property--but that any other
access to Highway 100 must come through a parcel between Ring's 40 acres and the
published and posted Notice of Hearing--
With the help of a number of visual aids-half sections, vu-graph'slides and
Visual aids
Planning Commission Recommendations favorable to the petitioned reqoning
Mr. Hite reported that some preliminary studies have been madeas to what might
He added this is not a definition of what would actually
Mr. Louds Sachs, an attorney representing owners of the central property
Village Manager Hyde reminded Mr. Sachs that this Public Hearing/on the
Mr. Hyde stated he understands
Mr. Sachs replied his clients will pay their
Mr, Hite reported the proposed access to the Ring property from the
3- 4 3 /16/6 4
Highway, which parcel is not owned by the Rings.
same . He asked several quggt'ong.qout Itthe proportion of the property which
would not be suitable for/]Sudkgh: and inquired about the difference
construction of multiple residences, office buildings and commercial buildings
would make in the tax base.
disagreeing with Mr. Hite on the amount of property which would be buildable
for residential signle family homes, Rev. Anderson reported he cannot see what
this proposed rezoning would do to increase the valuation of homes in the area;
that he feels the Council has a responsibility to the home owners East of
Highway #lo0 to match the zoning on the west side of the Highway to that on
the East side.
Mr. William Gallup, 4809 Trillium Lane, reported the property owners in
the vicinity (principally the East side of Highway 100) of this proposed proiect
have been to Council Meetings off and on since 1956 relative to the proposed
zoning of this area; that: the present zoning has been approved by these property
owners as a compromise; that he feels there should be no rezoning until owners
have had a chance to see if-residential builders will build single-family dwellings
in that part of the Nelson Farm now zoned for single family residential building.
Nr. Gallup added he feels it is a reflection on the Planning Commission that this
proposal has been allowed to come before the Council for consideration, after
a zoning program had been already been approved.
Edina has gone down to nothing; his second concern is the view from his.picture
windoM--and that he does not like Metro-U.S. Plans for R-4 Apartments.
that Stow Company sold the property with the present zoning, after trying for
three years to get that plan accepted--that he doesn't want anyone to get the idea
that Stow Company has tried to pull down what has been done.
from W. Stow as to whether he had not attempted to get the property at approximately
W.74th Street zoned for a gasoline service station. Mr. Stow replied in affirmative,
stating he had had this matter in court, to prove he could have -the station.
the people on the East side of Highway #loo, whereas this one does not,
immediately East of the Ring 40 acres and north of the Metro property.
replied there have been two requests for multiple dwellings, both of which have
been denied by Commission.
development. fib. Sachs replied there are no definite plans; that development
cannot be forced and it will com-e when the time is right for it to be developed.
Br, Bredesen inqiiired of Mr. Sachs as to whether the objections raised by his
clients would be withdrawn if the Rings could be assumed of convenient access.
Mr . Sachs replied, "Absolutely.
for Eetro-U.S., explained that the plan had been made to secure the best land use
and most appropriate land use for this large tract; that the facts of the railroad,
ad the proposed upgrading of Highway 100, have contributed to problems of develop-
ment on this parcel, wh6ce the land itself is none too good. He went on to explain
that there are a park and a lake proposed between the Office Building District and
the Highway; that offices will be restricted to one-story type buildings and.there
will be no high buildings in this area.
statements that the land is not suitable for single family dwellings, then the
Council should be appraised of what area is and what area is not suitable; that he
feels this re€lection on the property cannot be justified.
considers some 50% of the area difficult to build on for single family dwellings;
taking a11 factors into consideration, other factors being the location in relation
to railroad and highway, and soil itselfenot the only $actor.
VanValkenburg moved that this Public Hearing be continued to March 30, to give
the Council an opportunity to consult with the Planning Commission.
Dr. Chester V. Anderson, 4808 Hibiscus Avenue, expressed himself as being
concerned with the change in plans because the former zoning had shown single
family dwellings where multiples and office buildings are now planned; and Mr.
Gallup asked that Council consider the possibility of zoning the entire area
office building and planned industrial district, saying he feels that having a
number of 2-1/2 story apartment houses right in the middle of a commercial area
would be of no great value to the developers.
to Monday, March 30, at 7:OO P.M.
Reverend Roger Anderson, 4905 Lantana Lane, asked that zoning remain the
After receiving replies from Mr. Hite--and
'I
Plr. Struck, 4745 Hibiscus Avenue, stated his main concern, now, is that Lake
Mr, E. C. Stow told audience that this is not the llStow Company" plan--
Mr. Bredesen inquired
Pastor Anderson said he believes the Stow Company plan shows consideration for
Mayor Bredesen inquired as to the plans for development of the property
Xr. Hite
I Mr. Bredesen then inquired as to the Ring plan for
This is ow only ob j ection$'.
Hr. James Hawkes, of Fiidwest Planning and Research Company, Planning Consultants
Pastor Anderson suggested that if the Council is to be at all influenced by .
Mr. Hite replied he
I .
.
VanValkenburg's motion was seconded by Tupa and carried. Hearing continued
3/16/64 35
COUNCIL GRANTS PETITION FOR LOT FACING ON JOHNSON DRIVE RATHER THAN WARDEN AVENUE--
LOT 1. GREENLEAF MANOR. Mayor Bredesen called Public Hearing on.the petition of . - I Mr. C. D, Jacobson for waiver of zoning ordinance requirements, to permit him to
face house on Lot 1, Greenleaf Manor on Johnson Drive ratheruthan on Warden Avenue.
The Planning Commission had recommended favorably on this request at its meeting
of March 4; Mr, Jacobson having reported he has received consent of owner of
adjacent property. Pdanning Director Hite presented Affidavit of Mailing of
Notice of Hearing, which was approved and placed on file.
Planning Commission's recommendation, there were no objections from the floor
and none had been received prior to the Hearing. VanValkenburg's-motion that
zoning variance be granted and Mr. Jacobson be permitted to face home on Johnson
Drive was seconded by MacMillan and carried.
Council reviewed
SIDE-YARD AND FRONT-YARD VARIANCES PERMITTED FOR PROPOSED DOUBLE BUNGALOW AT 5308-12
Wo7OTH STREET--LOT 2, BLOC @i;goctor presented
Affidavit of Mailing of "N A C.D. Jacobson
for permit to locate his proposed double bungalow, on Lot 2, B1. 1, Brookview Hts.
3rd Addn., 26 Ft. from the Street, with a side-yard variance on two corners--one at
eight feet on Northeast Corner and one at 7.4 feet on Southwest Corner.
accordance with Notice, Public Hearing was called on this petition; Planning
Commission's favorable recommendation of March 4th was reviewed by Council; no
objections were made from the floor, and it was reported that no written objections
had been received prior to the Hearing,
Yard Variances from Zoning Ordinance be granted was seconded by Rixe and carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON NUMEROUS PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS.
Affidavits of Publication in Edina-Morningside.Courier on March 5 and 12, 1964, of
Posting on Official Bulletin Boards, and on-Mailing to owners of affected properties
"Notice of Public Hearings on Permanent Street Surfacing and Concrete lurb and Gutter",
which notice was approved as to form and ordered placed on file.
notice given, Public Hearings were called on the proposed improvements as hereinafter
listed, and action was taken by Council as recorded herein;
for ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING, WITH PORTLAND CE~JENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, whereas
the amounts given in the Published Notice are for PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVING
WITH INTEGRAL CURB--the Engineering Department having estimated the costs on this
latter type work to be a net 10 to 15% higher than the former work. Manager Hyde
told the large audience that some of the work has been petitioned; that some has
not been petitioned but that the streets have become a maintenance problem and it
is believed construction should be done this year.
ROSEMARY LANE FROM VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO END OF CUL-DE-SAC.
given as $11,345.29, proposed to be assessed against fourteen lots in Valley Vista,
for $810.38 per Lot.
objections had been received prior to the Hearing; and Mr. Hyde notified Council
that Mr. Hugh Brenner, developer of tract, had called from Florida this morning
to ask that project be expedited,
was seconded by Tupa and unanimously carried. (See action of later in Meeting,
Ordering Improvement).
be kaKen on whichever projects are approved this evening on a base bid of Asphalt
Concrete Paving with PCC Concrete Curb and Gutter, with alternate of PCC Paving
with Integral Curb; and Engineer Hite recommended that award be made by Council
"all one.waytl, so that the best possible prices might be obtained.
DUBLIN CIRCLE FROM W,70TH STREET TO END OF CUL-DE-SAC.
as $7,220.99, proposed to be assessed against eight lots, for $901.62 per Lot.
There were no objections from the floor, and none had been received prior to the
Hearing.
VanValkenburg's motion, that project be approved,was seconded by MacMillan and
unanimously carried. (See Resolution of later in Meeting, Ordering Improvement).
MEROLD DRIVE FROM GROVE STREET TO WYCLIFFE ROAD. Estimate of Cost was Given as
$15,856.41, proposed to be assessed against 1,788.52 Assessable Feet, for $8.87
per Foot, or, on 23 assessable lots at $689.41 per Lot.
Merold Drive, inquired as to whether the Estimate included the"S1.00 per foot
charge for the Methodist Church's share of the assessment"; was informed that
Merold Drive will not have such assessment ; and Mr, Tomeraasen, developer of the
area, asked that Village !'try not to have the work done deae during the "Parade
of Homes",
objections had been received prior to the Hearing.
was seconded by MacMillan and unanimously carried.
Meeting, Ordering Improvement).
In
VanValkenburg's motion that Side and Front-
Clerk presented
Pursuant to due
Audience was informed that Estimates of Costs as given herein tonight will be
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT SURFACING WITH PCC CURE3 mD GUTTER,
Estimate of Cost was .
There were no objections from the audience, no written
VanValkenburg's motion for approval of project
Before further Hearings were conducted, explanation was made that bids will
2. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT SURFACING WITH PCC CURB AND GUTTER,
Estimate of Cost was given
Mr. Hyde reported there are no homes, yet, on this short street,
3. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT SURFACING WITH PCC CURB AND GUTTER,
Mr. W. R. Strasser, 5821
There were no objections to the proposed improvement, and no written
Tupa's motion approving project
(See Resolution of later in
3/16/64
4. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND
BUTTER IN ALL STREETS IN "LAKE EDINA THIRD AND FOURTH ADDITIONS"--WEST' SHOE DRIVE,
HIBISCUS AVE., KELLOGG AVE.. SEDUIJI LANE AND POPPY LANE. Estimate of Cost was given
s'
as $80,304.10, proposed to be assessed against 94 Assessable Lots, for $856.36 p6r
Lot.
said he cannot understand why this matter has ever come to Public Hearing-that the
Corporation has a contract with Victor Carlson E Sons,to do this work.
Hyde told the Council the Village had written to Mr. Stow on January 22, of this year
informing him of the Village's plan for the surfacing.of these streets; that no reply
had been received; also, that Victor Carlson E Sons does not have a signed contract
with Estow Corp. at this time.
has not been signed is that the Contractor has not been able to get the specifications
from the Village for the work.
the information he had requested, some two or three months ago.
that the Council order in the Improvement as a Village project, subject to the Village's
ascertaining Estow Corporation's actual contract with Carlson ; and Stow countered' that
"if the Village will give Carlson the specifications you will have the streets paved".
Nayor Bredesen suggested that Council continue the Public Hearing on Proposed Permanent
Surfacing and Concrete Curb and Gutter xmprovement for Lake Edina Third and Fourth
Addition Streets until Monday, March 30, 1964, so that the contractor, Carlson, might
.be given all specifications and a contra$ betE\reen Estow Corp. and Victor Carlson &Sons
Inc., for the proposed Street Improvement be signed. VanValkenburg so moved. Hotion
secondehy Rixe and carried.
IN VIEW LANE FROM HWY.#169 TO SCHAEFER ROAD: SCHAEFER RD. FROM VIEW LANE TO STAUDER
Estimate of Cost was read as $52,855.60, of which $52,075.60 is Assessable'against
3,931.23 Assessable Feet, for $13.25 per Assessable Foot. Mr. Hyde reported that the
reason the cost is high is that a11 the lots on the South side of Stauder Circle will
have their long sides abutting this street and thus receive the "1/3 of long sidel'
assessment treatment. He added that the Village does recommend that Concrete Curb
and Gutter be included as part of this project. Mr. J. M. Hyland, 5601 Schaefer Road,
who stated he had just moved into Edina from New York--choosing Edina to avo$d the
city-type concrete curbs and gutters, ask that the Council seriously consider the
100% petition against installation of Curb and Gutters, filed earlier. Nr. Hite
reported curb and gutter is specifically recommended because of the bad grades-
9% on View Lane,.6.6% on Stauder Circle, etc.
extremely large lots (such as those in the original Parkwood Knolls) 24 foot streets
without curb and gutter are permitted (although curb and gutter still makes a better
street) but that where there are smaller lots the curbs and gutters are definitely
recommended.
Nr. Hite informed him it hgs been found that the bgacktop type is difficult to
maintain and has proved to be unsatisfactory.
Circle, inquired as to what will be done to the streets in original Parkwopd Knolls
at the time surfacing is zestored.
that curb and gutter will not be added. Mr. Reinhard then stated he feels $hat there
should be uniformity in the handling of street improvements throughout the Parkwood
Knolls areas-not curb and gutter for .a few blocks and then long stretches without it;
that having two kinds of streets would spoil the neighborhood* completely.
tar. Hite reported that the "rural1' style Parkwood Knolls has been deviated from
in the View Lane area, where lots are much smaller than in the original Parkwood Knolls'
that driveways will be closer together, there will be some street parking on these
streets--which does tend to feather the edges of blacktop streets.
Trustee MacEUlan expressed himself as being concerned about the possible
lfwash'l situation, asking Engineer Hite if the grades heretofore discussed mean there
will be a serious wash problem without curb and gutter.
the grade is in excess of 5% there is a wash problem.
View Lane there are walk-out-basements and water will drain between ho.uses ,into the
lake, thus eliminating any wash problem here.
area want to retain the beauty of the originaL Parkwood Knolls.
IvIr. Harvey Hansen, representing Carl M. Hansen, developer of the area and owner
of most of the lots, told Council that the old part of Parkwood Knolls, which will be
resurfaced soon as part of the repent sewer-water peoject, will have no curb and gutter,
that none of the str.eets in $he area under discussion this evening has a grade steeper
than some of these old streets-and that there is a storm sewer in the new street.
k5r. Hyde stated there had been considerable feathering off at the edges in old Parkwood
Knolls because of a lack of curb. and gutfer.
No one in the audience expressed himself as being in favor of Curb and Gutter.
The petition against this installation also requested that the street surfacing be
expedited .
VanValkenburg s mot ion, tha< the Street Surf acing proj ect be approved without
the Curb and Gutter, was seconded by MacMillan and unanimously carried. (See Resolution
of later in Meeting, Ordering Improvement).
Mr. Edward C. Stow, President of Estow Corp., developers of these two additions,
Village Manager
Mr. Stow told Council the only reason the contract
Engineer Hite reported I4r. Carlson had received all
Mr. Hyde recommended
.
5.. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PER~ANENT SURFAUNG AND PCC CURB AND GUTTER
CIRCLE: STAUDER CIRCLE FROM SCHAEFER RD. TO N. LINE OF PARKNOOD KNOLLS 12TH ADDN.
He added that where there are
'I Mr. Hyland recomended that the roll-type blacktop curbs be uspd, but
IYlr. A. C. Reinhard, 6404 Stauder
Nr. Hyde replied that the streets will be re-paved;
Mr, Hite replied that any time
Mr. G. 1.5. Darkenwals, 5808 View Lane, told Council that on the West side of
He added that residents of this new
P
3/16 /6 4
.i 6. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED EERMANENT 'STREET SURFACING AND PCC CURB AND '
GUTTER, STUART AVE. FROM GROVE ST. TO 6.0' SOUTH 'OF CENTER LINE OF BENTON AVE.:
BENTON AVE. FROM STUART AVE, TO TRACY AVE.
318,360 . 73 of which is assessable against 1 ,'913 . 35 Assessable Foot for $9.60 per
Assessabl'e Foot, or against nineteen assessable lots for $966.35 per Lot.
petition was presented, requesting that "Inasmuch as residents on Stuart Avenue
saw fit last fall to provide their own storm sewer taking care of runoff water
from these lots, it does not seem equitable that they should incur the additional
burden of providing storm s'ewers in an area to which they do not drain". Manager
Hyde explained that there is a small amount in the specifications for this pro-
posed-project to provide for storm sewer; and that it is planned to assess the
Stuart Avenue lot owaers slightly less than the Benton Avenue people to compensate
for their having provided their own storm sewer.
Avenue, asked that the proposed improvement be extended to serve his property.
With the use of a Vu-Graph slide, Mr. Hite showed Council the location of Mr.
Haw's property, telling Council he has been left high and dry in a very dffficult
situation; that the Village is not proposing to extend Stuart Avenue beyong
Benton Avenue but believes Mr. Haw can be provided with a driveway.
protested this, saying the traffic making the curfe from Stuart to Benton will be
driving down into his driveway; and that there will be no way for snow plows to
get in and out.
and Village officials discuss the matter of his access with him before bids are
taken, but Mr. Haw asked that project agproval be delayed until his problem iS
settled,
officials during the next couple of days.
of Public Hearing to March 30, asking Mr, Haw to see Village Engineer before that
time.
Estimate of Cost was aead as $18,490.73,
A
Mr. Joseph N. Haw, 5816 Stuart
Mr. Haw
I
Mr, Hyde suggested that the project be approved, and Mr. Haw
At a question from Mr.' Hyde, he said he could sit down with Village
Mayor Bredesen announced continuation
7, PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND PCC CURB AND
GUTTER,RICHHOND .LANE FROM RICHMOND AVE, TO WINDSOR AVE.
read as $3,804.64, $2,745.10 being assessable, with an effort being made to
Estimate of Cost was
'equalize the assessments for street improvements against the four lots assessable--
with those lots already having paid for surfacing on other streets paying less
than those which had paid little or nothing for such improvements.
Assessments were $519.04 for Lot 1, Block 2, and $485,79 for Lot 16, Block 2,
Richmond Hills; $640.27 for Lot 5, Block 3, and $1,100.00 for Lot 6, Block 3,
Richmond Hills. 14r. V, E. (Babe) LeVoir, 5401 Richmond Lane, protested rather
vehemently that he has no'objection to either the surfacing or the curb and '
gutter, providi'ng the Village will guararitee to pump the water out of his
basement and yard when they become flooded.
excess of $1,000 to keep the water out of his basement; that his problem is to
get water out of his yard into Ricllmond Lane, and that if curbing is installed
there will be additional problem. Nr. Hite reported that if Mr. LeVoir's back
yard is lower than the street, installation of Curbing will do nothing to
help drain water out onto the street, but it will help to keep the street water
from draining into the yard.
from the street but from some three neighboring lots.
that Public Hearing be continued to March 30th for further study was seconded
by Mac@illan and carried.
The Estimated
He told Council he has spent in I
Mr, LeVoir protested the water is not draining
VanValkenburg's motion,
- 8. PUBLLC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT STREET SUWACING ONLY IN WILLIAM
AVENUE FROM WEST 51ST STREET TO WEST 52ND STREET. Estimate of Cost was read as
$5¶032.72, proposed to be assessed against 1,202.50 Assessable Feet, for $4.19
per Assessable-Foot, or against 24 Assessable Lots for $209.70 per Lot. Mr. Mark
J, Dougsll, 5116 William Avenue, presented petition signed by owners of mwners of
some 18 residencesin this block, apposit&,$he project.
the residents are willing to pay for maintenance; that they "do not want blacktopping,
do not feel it does the job, and feel they have a pretty good street the way it is.
Mr. E. R. Doeling, 5104 William, denied that the street is in a state of disrepair
right now; added he feels residents should make use of the value still in the street
before it is torn up and new work done. The resident at 5115 William told Council
he believes the curb and gutter installed some time ago has helped to keep the
street in good shape.
work done on it.
and VanValkenburg moved that project be abandoned, with instructions that there
be no maintenance on the street unless property owners request and are willing to
pay for it.
MacMillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, aye; VanValkenburg, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and
motion was unanimously carried.
Mr, Dougall told Council
It was noted that the Curb andGutter is settling and needs
No one expressed himself as favoring the proposed improvement,
Motion seconded by Tupa. Rollcall vote on motion showkd the following:
9. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND PCC CURB AND
TO INTERZACHEN BLVD.: HANKERSON AVE. FROM W.52ND ST. TO INTERLACHEN BLVD. Mr. Hvde
GUTTER IN OXFORD AVE. FROM W.51ST STo TO CUL-DE-SAC: WILLIAM AVE. FROM W.51ST ST.
reported to Council that of the above streets only one block had been petitioned,
being William Avenue from W.5lst Street to Interlachen Blvd.
read as $36,340.93, $36,210.93 of which is proposed to be assessed against some
3,842.19 Assessable Feet, at $9.42 per Assessable Foot. Petitions signed b
residents of Hankerson Avenue between' Interlachen Blvd. and W. 52nd Street , / y
residents of Oxford Avenue between Interlachen Blvd. and W.5lst Street opposing
Estimate of Cost was
Zmd
38 3/16/64
the proposed improvement wese filed.
used by many heavy trucks as a cutoff from Interlachen to Hwy.#169; that rdsidents
have many small children and surfacing the street wouXd simply mean more and
speedier traffic-that residents simply do not want the improvement ,
Peabody, '5120 Hankerson Avenue, complained once again about the alley improvement
in the alley befween William and Hankerson and between IJ.53st and I?.52nd Streets,
saying that if the Village improves the street the same way they improved the alley
he simply could not afford to have the street improved. . Manager Hyde reminded Mr.
Peabody and Council that report received from Twin City Testing Laboratory showed
alley meeting specifications.
Peabody, saying that when Twin City Testing Laboratory drilled its test holes it
did so in the very best Bart of the alley.
Mr. Kenneth Peterson, 5113 Oxford Avenue, supported the petition of the Oxford
Avenue residents protesting improvement. br. Roy I?. Vincent objected the improvement in William Avenue; and letter of
Mr. and Mrs. Sidney S. Green, 5237 Interlachen Blvd., supporting the improvement,
was submitted to Council
VanValkenburg then moved that Permanent Street 'Surfacing and PCC Curb and
Gutter Improvement for William Avenue from Interlachen Blvd. to W.5;lst' Street be
approved; that the balance of the proposed improvement be denied, with instructions
that there will be no maintenance on Oxford Avenue from W.5lsi St. south to Cul-de-
Sac, and on Hankerson Ave. from W,5Qad St. to Interlachen Blvd. until such time as
residents request and are willing to pay for same,
and carried, with MacMillan, Rixe, VanValkenburg and Bredesen voting aye, 'and
Trustee Tupa not voting.
for William Avenue).
as to what the Village expects to do relative to the road pattern in this area, and,
specifically , as to whether Summit Avenud will be closed.
proposed to close Summit Avenue at such time as Brookside Avenue is re-routed, Mr.
Hite explained in some detail the proposal for the re-routing of Brookside Avenue.
Another question was then asked concerning rumors being circulated about
a proposed new Shopping Center ''of Southdale proportions".
insofar as the Village is aware, any shopping center is just a rumor.
IN V.51ST STREET FROM OXFORD AVENUE TO HANKERSON AVENUE. Estimate of Cost on this
proposed project was $13,781.29, $13,001.29 of which is assessable.
to get cross-streets surfaced, a new type of special assessment was considered-that
of levying an assessment against properties abutting the street in an amount equal
to the Estimated Cost per Front Foot--being $8.36 in this case--for 1/3 of their
long frontage, and assessing an area consisting of lots within a half block of these
cross streets in & amount of $90 .OO per lot, wit!h .the Village General Fund taking
the balance of the cost in lieu of maintenance.
representing William, Hankerson, Bedford Avenues residents, protesting this proposed
improvement, Manager Hyde recommended that it be 'abandoned with the same understanding
about mairitenance2as in the €oregoing actions.
improvement be abandoned, with instructions that no maintenance be done on the
street until property owners request and are willing to pay for same.
heavy trucks on Hankerson.
propos'ed improvements 'in this area is that residents object to paying $90.00 per lot
for the cross streets; that he has tried to get a petition for oiling this stree't and
no one was interested. ' He asked that someihing be done to alleviate the dust.
advocating a permanent job if anything at all is to be done with the street..
ayes and one not voting, as follows:
VanVaLkenburg, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and motion was adopted.
LANE TO W.6OTH STREET.
$12,827.35, $12,307.35 of which is assessable, against 2,659.56 Assessable Feet,
for $4.63 per Assessable Foot.
reported the Schools have indicated their willingness to go along with Furb and
Gutter on their side of the street, and that this is the reason why this improve-
ment is being proposed; that it is not a petitioned project. Mr. K. L. Sundquist,
5944 Concord Avenue, presented petition signed by 90% of the residents whose property
abuts the street, objecting to installation of curb and gutter on their side of the
street.
propBrty curbed; that this property has not been maintained; that unless curbing is
installed on the school side, now, this same matter is likely to come up again in
the near future. Nanager Hyde said that curbing only one side of the street doesn't
seem to make much sense; and Mr. Hite adaed that the Ehgineering Department has been
considering State Aid help for Concord Avenue--bu% that using state aid funds would
involve increasing the width of the street to make it at least as wide as Southview
Lane--which he felt sure the residents would not approve.
Nr. Kenneth Chetwood, 5224 W. 51st St,, told Council Hankerson Avenue 2s being
Mr. 'Don
,
Mr. Gruss, 5117 William Avenue, supported €4~.
blotion seconded-by MacMillan,
(See Resolution of later in Meeting, Ordering Improvement
During discussion on the above proposed improvement, question had been &ked
Replying that it is
Answer to this was. that
io, PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERHANENT STREET SURFACING AND PCC CURB AND GUTTER
I In an effort
Because petitions were presented
Rixe then moved that the proposed
Hr. 'L. 3. Hubbard, 5029 Hankerson Avenue, complained that the County <uns its
fie resident at 5044 William Avenue added that the prime objection to811 the
He asked that load limits be posted in this area.
Mr. Elmer Lindborg, 5045 Oxford, said he had paid for oil for two years,
FSxe's motion was seconded by MacMillan; and on Rollcall Vote there bere four
MacMillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, not voting,
U. 'PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER IN CONCORD AVENUE FROM SOUTHVIEW
Estimate of Cost on this proposed project was given as
Engineer Hite The street is already surfaced,
hr. Sundquist added that most petitioners would like' to see the school
Mayor Bredesen inquired
as to whether curbing on one
14r. Hite answered that while
the main trouble seems to be
not been maintained, and the
3/16/64
side of the street will correct the drainage.
it will not completely correct, it will help; that
the unsightliness of the school property, which has
fact that children cannot tell where the street
ends and the boulevard begins.
this stretch, and Mr. Hyde answered that Police Chief Bennett has been making
a study of this, and is about ready to make recommendations on this matter.
inquired about continuing this curb project south of the School; Mr. Sundquist
protesting it.
Gutter in West Side of Concord Avenue between Soutpview Lane and School Road
only, and abandoning balance of proposed projecf.
and on Rollcall vote there were five ayes and no nays, and motion was unanimously
adopted.
A question was raised as to whether traffic cannot be slowed down along
Mr. A. C. Lyon, 5937 Concord Avenue, and Mr. Sundquist, 5944 Concord Avenue,
VanValkenburg moved approving proposed Portland Cement Concrete Curb and
Motion was seconded by Rixe,
(See Resolution of later in Meeting, Ordering Improvement).
SIDEWALK FOR WEST SIDE OF CONCORD AVENUE TO BE BICUSSED WITH SCHOOLS.
against resident Curb and Gutter had requested that School be required to install
Petition
sidewalk, and at Mr , Sundquist 's question concerning a sidewalk improvement, Mr .
Hite stated there would be a discussion with the Schools relative to this matter;
that it could not be included with this improvement.
12. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPO~ED EERMANENT STREET SURFACING IN ASHCROFT AVENUE
FROM VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO W.6OTH STREET.
DrODOSed to be assessed against 1,372.78 Assessable Feet, for $4.04 per Assessable
Estimate of Cost was given as $5,550.44,
12. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPO~ED EERMANENT STREET SURFACING IN ASHCROFT AVENUE
FROM VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO W.6OTH STREET. Estimate of Cost was given as $5,550.44,
Droposed to be assessed against
feet; or against 15 Assessable Lots, for $370.03 per Lot. Mr. Corey, at corner of
Ashcroft Avenue and Valley View Road, inquired as to whether existing base will
be. used, or whether it will be replaced before surfacing. Mr. Hite ,reported the
existing base will have to be replaced.
and none had been received prior to the Hearing. Tupa's motion, that project be
approved, was seconded by VanValkenburg and unanimously carried. (See Resolution
of later in Meeting, Ordering Improvement ) .
There were no objections from the flpor,
13. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPO~ED PERNANEXT STREET SURFACING AND PCC CURB AND
GUTTER IN ST.JOHNS AVENUE FROM VALLEY VIEW ZOAD TO W.6OTH STREET.
=was given as $12,732.30, proposed to be assessedagainst 1,577.49 Assessable
Estimate of.
-- Feet, for-$8.07 per Foot, or against seventeen lots for $748.96 per Lot. The
resident at 6025 St.Johns Avenue reported to Council that because of an error in
mailing Notice, some property owners along this street had not received a notice
of this particular Hearing.
anything being done on St.Johns; that the street is still. settling fron construction
of storm sewer. At Mr, Bredesen's suggestion that Public Hearing be cont'inued to
March 30, so that Clerk could notify all affected property owners, Tupa so moved.
Motion seconded by MacMillan and carried.
Another resident' said that "everybody is against
14. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND PCC CURB AND
GUTTER IN W.59TH STREET FROM CONCORD AVE. TO OAKLAWN AVE.: W.6OTH STREET FROM ____~
CONCORD AVE. TO WOODDALE AVE,; W.61ST ST. FROM WOODDALE AVE. TO BROOKVIEW AVE. - .- _. - With the aid of a Vu-Graph Slide, the route of the proposed improvement, and the
area proposed to be assessed there€or were shown. Manager Hyde reported fhis is
a Council-initiated project, in an attempt to find out how to get cross-streets
surfaced. Showing the audience a map, Mr. Hite explained that in the newer
portions of the Village (comprgsing about half the total area), the. cross streets
have been surfaced as part of an "area-wide" job, with all lots in the area. being
assessed a portion of the cost. Mr. Hyde explained that it is prpposed, in the
aase of these streets now under consideration to assess properties abutting the
streets at an,Estimated $8.63 per foot for 1/3 of their abutting side footages,
and to assess an area comprising lots for approximate1y.half a block in each
direction from these cross streets at $90 per lot for part of the cost-this
assessment to include the lots abutting the street--with the Village to take the
balance of the cost in lieu of maintenance costs. Total Estimated Cost of the
project was given as $60,419.42, of which $20,138.28 would be assessed against
abutting properties, $29,340.00 assessed at $90.00 per lot to 'tareat' 10%:~ including
abutting properties, with the Village paying $2,405.00 for Curb Radius, plus an
Estimated $10,941.14 in lieu of.maintenance costs.
Mr. B. A. Ringbloom, 5900 Oaklawn Avenue, presented a petition signed by
owners of'kh 16 of the 24 Lots on W.59th Street, opposing the project.
Ringbloom stated these owners have always paid for their own oil and are perfectly
willing to continue to do so; that they do not have any problem; that they have
very little traffic, don't want curbs and don't want.surfacing. .
area for ten years; feels it would be wonderful to have the streets improved; and
a gentleman who stated he lives across the street: from Mrsi'Rushing asked to go
on record as definitely in favor of curb and gutter and su-Efacing at the "schooltt
end of W.59th Street. He asked concerning school buses, and Mr. Hyde told-him
blacktop surface holds up very well under-bus traffic if curb and gutter is
included.
Mr.
Mrs. L. G. Rushing, 5845 St.Johns Avenue, told Council she has Lived in the
4p 3/16/64
pllr. L. J. Olson,
improvement. He said
besides the surfacing
I 5901 Concord Avehue, expressed himself as wanting the
the street had had oil, and that this is no remedy; that,
the street should have curb and gutter because of the
.
children who walk down the street,
order improvement in from Concord to Wooddale, rather than from Concord to
Oaklawn,
than that Nest, because Wooddale feeds traffic into the cross streets; toward
He added he believes the Council should
Mayor Bredesen agreed that there is a different situation East of Wooddale
schools.
At a question as to cost, Engineer
projects have already been abandoned by
figured on Village's doing all the work
here this evening would be valid.
Mr. Hite reported that the schools
Hite replied that inasmuch *as several
Council whereas Estimates had been
proposed, none of the Estimates read
have askedthe Village to consider
sidewalks in the area, just because of some of the problems mentioned bye
residents here this evening, together with sidewalk on Concord Avenue as far
south as Valley View Road; that sidewalk cannot go in without curb and gutter.
Mr. Robert Ervin, 5900 Kellogg, told Council several property owners on
this block object to the proposal, and the resident at 6901 looddale Avenue
recommended a corduroy road to slow traffic down, rather than surfaced street
to speed traffic.
needs Curb and paving and everything,
6117 Oaklawn Avenue inquired as to how much. park property is being assessed, and
was informed that six lots will be assessed.
or TJ.6Oth St., and E.&. Hyde replied the cost would be approximately $400 per
Mr. John Kistle, 6101 Nooddale Avenue, said he would like to see fJ.6ls-t:
Street surfaced; that it does bear considerable traffic because of the park.
Rixe then moved that Council approve Permanent Street Surfacing with
PCC Curb and Gutter €or W,59th Street from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue,
kf . 60th Street from Concord Avenue to Wooddale Avenue, and W. 61st St ,' €rom Wooddale
Avenue to Brookview Avenue.
objection to curbs, saying Fairfax avenue was improved some years ago without curb
and is holding up well; and the owner at 5913 FairiEax said he would be in favor
of eliminating curb and gutter on l?,59th Street because this will not keep the
children off the street.
Some informa-f discussion was had relative to sidewalk. on N.59th Street,
and Mayor Bredesen suggested that W.59th Street owners sit down with the Village
Engineering Department before bids are taken to discuss the advantages of a
24-foot travelled roadway plus sidewalk, as compared with a 30-foot roadway
without sidewalk. *
VanValkenburg and Bredesen all voting aye; and motion was unanimously carried.
GUTTER IN BEARD PLACE FROH k7.62ND STREET TO BEARD AVENUE: AND IN BEARD PLACE FROPI
W.62ND STREET TO CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY,
which $18,882.98 is proposed to be assessed, at $9.14 per assessable feet against
2,065.58:feet; or at $755.32 against 25 Assessable Lots. One property owner in the
area No?.+& Of W.62nd Street told Council that, of 19 homes in this block, nine home
objections registered.
proposed Permanent Street Surfacing and PCC Curb and Gutter in Beard Place from
W.62nd Street to the Crosstown Highway, abandoning that portion of the improvement
in Beard Place from W.62nd Street to Beard Avenue, and with instructions that there
be no maintenance on the street unless requested and paid for by the property
owners . Motion was seconded by. MacMillan and unanimously carried by Rollcall
vote.
saying he believes residents are entitled to street maintenance as part of the
general tax levy.
lery does no good on oiled streets once they have beinn to disintegratk.
Mr. Crane, 5945 St.Johns Avenue, reported that 60th Street desparately
- Saying there is a fair amount of Park traffic on ,W,6lst Street, Mr. Nayer,
An inquiry aas made as to the cost to a property owner abutting 17.59th St.
iot .
Motion was seconded by Tupa.
Before vote could be taken, Mr. Peterson, 5901 Fairfax Avenue,announced his
I
Vote was then taken on Mr. Rixe's motion, and showed MacMillan, Rixe, Tupa,
15. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND PCC CURB AND
Estimate of Cost was read as $19,077.98, of
present this evening to protest the improvement. There were no other . VanValkenburg then moved that the Council approve the
HIr. VanDale, 6119 Beard Place, protested the "no maintenance" action,
Manager Hyde explained that the minimum amohnt provided in tax
*
.i6. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND PCC CURB AXD
GUTTER IN W.62ND STREET FROM EWING AVENUE TO ABBOTT AVENUE.
given as $30,805.54; $30,285.54 of which is proposed to be assessed as follows:
To abutting properties - $7,627.70, at $8.94 permAssessable Foot, on the'l/3
Side Yard Footage basis; to Area as set forth in Notice of Hearing, $90.00 per
Lot; this area including properties abutting M.62nd St. Mr. B.K. Pinckaers, . 6301 Ewing Avenue, expressed himself as opposing the project because he never
uses W.62nd Street; feels the people abutting the street should pay €or €he
improvement if they wanted.
body else's side footage at the time Ewing was improved; and Engineer Hife advised
Estimate of Cost was
I
He told Council that Ewing residents paid for "some-
Council Ewing
in which some
had been part of
side footage was
Improvement BA-35, a comprehensive street improvement
involved. He recommended that those lots assessed
c
41 3/16/64
Street Improvement BA-35 be relieved from assessment for this project if *I
approved.
doesn't use this street; that if the street is surfaced, there will be much more
traffic on it, and there are many children around because of the park. He added
there is no need for the curb, whatsoever, because there is nothing on the one
side of the street except the park.
Council does have the legal power to order in all these street improvements, it is
attempting to act in accordance with the wishes of the residents insofar as is
possible, One lady said she felt the reason residents are not to receptive to
improvements is that taxes have risen so "because of the re-evaluation"; was
informed by Mr. Hyde that the re-evaluation is not the reason for the tax jump--
it is school and county increased levies.
favor of this proposed improvement, and VanValkenburg moved that project be
abandoned.
Mr. Gardner, 6108 Zenith Avenue, told Council that the neighborhood
Trustee MacMillan reminded audience that while
No one expressed himself as being in
Motion seconded by Tupa and unanimously carried
VanValkenburg then o€fered the following Resolution and moved ilk adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING. IMPROVEMENTS
PERMANENT SURFACING AND CURB AND GUTTER
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, IYlinnesota, that this
CounciJ. heretofore caused notices of hearing to be duly published on the
following proposed improvements:
A. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE
CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING STREETS:
1.
2. Dublin Circle from W170th St. to end of Cul-de-sac.
3, Merold Drive from Grove St. to Wycliffe Rd.
9, View Lane from Hwy.#169 to Schaefer Rd,;
Schaefer Rd, from View Lane to Stauder Circle;
Stauder Circle from Schaefer Rd. to N. Line Parkwood Knolls 12th Addn,
William Aver from W,5lst St. to Interlachen Blvd,;
Hankerson Ave. from W.52nd St, to Interlachen Blvd.
W.6Oth St. from Concord Ave. to Wooddale Ave. ;
W.6lst St. from Wooddale Ave. to Brookview Ave.
Beard EL. from W.62nd St, to Crosstown Highway
Rosemary Lane from Valley View Road to Cul-de-sac.
5. Oxford Ave. from W.51st St. to cul-de-sac;
6. W,59th St. from Concord Ave, to Oaklawn Ave.;
7, Beard Place from W.62nd St. to Beard Ave.; .
B. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT SURFACING ONLY IN:
1, Ashcroft Avenue from Valley View Road to W.6Oth St'.
Co CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ONLY IN:
1, Concord Ave, from Southview Lane to W,GOth St.
and at the hearings held at the time and place specified in said notice the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully
advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the
construction of said improvements as hereinafter set forth- desi nating the respective improvements, temporarily, until the type of/P&ee? ha en9 surfacing khich
brill be constructed shall have been determined by the Councilsin accordance
with the Street Improvement Numbers hereinafter set forth; said designations
to be superceded by a permanent designation at such time as it is determined
by this Council: TEMPORARY STREET
A-1 Above - As Set Forth Above
IMPROVEMENT NOS,
1964-1 '
1964-2
A-3 Above - As Set Forth Above 1964-3
A-2 Above - As Set Forth Above
A-4 Above - Construction of Permanent Street Surfacing Only,
without Portland Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter, in
View Lane from Hwyb#169 to Schaefer Rd.;
Schaefer Rd. from View Lane to Stauder Circle;
Stauder Circle from Schaefer Rd, to N. Line Parkwood Knolls
12th Addn. 1964-4
A-5 Above - Construction of Permanent Street Surfacing and
Portland Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter, in William Ave.
from W.5ls-t St. to Interlachen Blvd. Only.
A-6 Above - Construction of Permanent Street Surfacing and
Portland Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter, in
W.59tl-i Street from Concord Ave. to Wooddale Ave.;
W.6Oth St. from Concord Ave. to Wooddale Ave,;
W.6lst St. from Wooddale Ave. to Brookview Ave, 1964-6
1964-5
A-7 Above - Construction of Permanent Street Surfacing and .
Portland Cement Concrete Curb and Gutter, in Beard Place
from W.62nd St, to Cross Town Highway Only. 1964-7
B-1 Above - As Set Forth Above i964-a
3/16 /6 4 42, IT FURTHER RESOLVED that at the hearing held at the time and place specified
in said notice the Council has duly considered the views of all persons. interested
and being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed
jwifh'coNSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ONLY IN:
Concord Ave. from Southview Lane to School ROad--I.lest Side Only.
that said improvement is hereby designated as STREET IWROVEMENT NO. B-76, and
the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include all lots and tracts
of land abutting the street proposed to be improved on the West (schooL-owned
properties).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the areas to be specially assessed for Street
Improvements Nos. 1964-1 to 1964-8, inclusive, shall be as follows:
For Street Improvements 1964-1, 3964-2, 1964-3, 1964-4, 1964-5, 1964-7
and 1964-8--AUlots and tracts of land abutting the respective streets proposed
to be improved.
to 18 incl., Block 6; Lots 7 to 18, incl., Block 7; Lots 7 to 18, incl., Block 8;
Lots 1 to 24, incl,, Block 9; Lots 1 to 24, incl., Block 10; Lots 1 to 24, incl.,
Block 11; Lots 1 to 24, incl., Block 12; Lots lo to 15, incl., Block 18; Lots 7
to 18, incl., Block 19; Lots 7 to 18, incl., Block 20; Lots 1 to 16, incl:,
Block 21; Lots 1to 22, incl., Block 22; Lots 3 to 24, incl., Block 23; and
Lots 13 to 23, incl., Block 24--All in Fairfax Addition;Lqts 1 to 13, incl., -
Block 1, and Lots 1 to 8, incl., Block 2, Valley View Terrace Addn,; Lots 1 to
7, incl., Block 1 and Lots 1 to 16, incl., Block 2, Valley View Terrace Qid
Addn.; and Lots 1to.8, incl,, Block I, and Lots l-to 7, incl., Block 2, Valley
View Terrace 3rd Addn.
Notion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by he, and on Rollcall there
.
I For Street Improvement No. 1964-6- Lots 7 to 18, incl., Block 5; Lots 7
, aye; Tupa, aye;
,COUNCIL VACATES JACKSON AVE. BETWEEN BELMOFG*LANE AND TROLGY LINE ADDN. AFTER PUBLIC
HEARING. Clerk presented Affidavits of Publication, -Posting-and Mailing of "Notice
of Public Hearing on Proposed Vacation of Jackson Avenue between Belmore Lane and
Trolley Line Addition", which affidavits were approved as to form and ordered placed
on file. Clerk explained that this one-block dtreet lies between two sections of
Village-owned park land, and that Park Department is recommending its Vacation.
There were no objections registered at the Hearing, and none had been received *
prior thereto, and VanValkenburg offered the following Resolution and move'd its
adoption :
D
RESOLUTION VACATING STREET
JACKSON AVENUE BETWEEN BELMORE LANE AND TROLLEY
LINE ADDITION
IHEREAS, two weeks' published notice and posted notice of a hearing to be had on
March 16, 1964, at 7:OO P.lL, on the proposed Vacation of Jackson Avenue lying between
Blocks Three and Four, West Minneapolis Heights Addition, and between Belmore Lane and
Trolley Line Addition has been given and made, and a hearing has been had thereon by
the Village Council:
NO17, TEEFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by thg"Vi1lage Council of the Village of Edina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following street be and is hereby vacated:
"THAT PORTION OF JACKSON AVENUE LYING BETWEEN BLS': THREE (3) AND FOUR (4),
ADDITION, all as platted and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds
in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota'!.
NEST HINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS ADDITION, AND BETWEEN BELMORE LANE AND TROLLEY LINE
Notion for adoption of the Resolutionbwas seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there
were five ayes and no nays, as follows:
VanValkenburg,. aye; and Bredesen, aye;-and I
REPORT RELATIVE TO STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT ON PEARCE PROPERTY LAID OVER.
Hite told Council the report.requested by the SPearces at the last regular nieeting,
relative to assessment for Storm Sewer on their property, is being'prepared by the
people who now own the property, but is not yet *ready for submission. Plattkr laid
over to next meeting.
BUMP TRUCK BID AWARDED TO MIDWAY FORD CO. Tabulation of Bids taken Ivlar'ch 13, on Dump
Truck and Box , showed receipt of Seven Bids, Midway Ford being low bidder on a Ford
750, Smitth SlOl Box and Garwood A50 Hoist at $4,659.00.
award to low bidder, and HacMillan so moved.
Engineer
Recommendation was for
Motion seconded by Rixe and carried.
7 v u
43 3/16 /64
Bids on ZruQk-ranged from low of $4,659.00 to high of $5,039.75, with second-#s
low bidder being Major Ford, Inc., at $4,749.00; third-low, International Harvester
Inc.,, at $4,750.00; and high bidder, Hopkins Motor Sales on Dodge at $5,039.75.
AWARD ON POLE BARN FOR GOLF COURSE DELAYED TO MARCH 30TH FOR LOCATION. Tabulation
of bids was presented, covering bids taken March 16th on a "Pole Type Storage
Building" for Braemar Links and Park. . Tabulation showed Marcus Construction
Company of Pri,nsburg,.Minnesota to be low bidder at $3,955.42 on Base Bid and
$5,362.22 with all alternates: E. G. Clinton Company, second-low at $5,020.00 and
$6,288.67, respectively; and Bryan Constnuction Co., Inc., third-low at .$5,532.00
and $6,836.00 respectively; C E B Builders Company being third-low on Base Bid
only, at $4,238.00.
further investigation as to site and a check of the low bidders.
stated he believes the Park Board has settled the location of the building (as
the result of a field trip held last Saturday morning) in a-place which Mr.
Bredesen said.he could best describe as "being in the midst of scrub popple".
Mr. Hyde told Council that because of some difficulties on sewer and water
service it might still be better to locate in the originally selected location.
Mayor Bredesen suggested that award be laid over to March 30, in order that
matter of location might be settled; and it was so ordered.
Manager Wyde recommended that award be laid over for a
Mayor Bredesen
IMPROVEMENT PETITIONS ACCEPTED AND REFERRED TO VILLAGE ENGINEER.
Improvement Petitions were submitted, and by motion VanValkenburg, seconded by
Tupa and carried were accepted and referred to the Village Engineer for programming:
1. SANITARY SEWER - Zenith Avenue between #6117 and #6125 Zenith .Ave.
2. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN- In Rolling Green--Bywood West from Interlachen
Blvd, to Annaway Drive; Annaway Drive from Bywood West to Mait Lane; 14ait Lane
from Annaway Drive to Merilane; Merilane from Mait Lane to Annaway Drive at
Bywood West
The following
3. SANITARY SEWER - Schey Drive from Dewey Hill Road to Gleason Road.
COUNCIL RENEWS BEER AND LIQUOR LICENSES FOR YEAR APRIL 1, 1964 TO APRIL 1, 1965.
Clerk presented a list of applications for Renewals for coming license year, as
follows: Beer-On Sale, Ten; Beer-Off Sale, Sixteen; Liquor-Club, TWO. She reported
that the only applications for: renewals not yet received are Normandale Golf for
Beer-On Sale, and Valley View Grocery, for Beer-Off Sale.
applicatipns, Motion by VanValkenburg, that Council approve applications for I
Police Chief Wayne Bennett, was seconded by MacMiMan and unanimously carried.
There are no new
.renewal of Beer and Liquor Licenses, subject to approval of applications by
''CLUB HOUSE AND GOLF COURSE OPERATION" REPORTSUBMITTED AND ORDERED PLACED ON FILE.
Manager Hyde presented to the Council a report, dated March 9, 1964 and entitled
Itclub House and golf Course 0 era i nrt
July 4 to October 15, 1964,/6!~n&k% bff Course Operation will be an estimated
$37,927.00; for Grounds Maintenance, $54,012.00, for a Grand Total of $91,939.00;
and that for the full season of 1965, expenditures will total some $123,960.75.
Manager Hyde reviewed in detail several of the expenditures listed on report;
w ich showed that during the season
and report was accepted and ordered placed on file. ..
KENNETH-HANSEN DEVELOPMENT PLAN ACCEPTED BY PLANNING COMMISSION, MR. HITE REPORTS.
Planning Director Hite reported to Council that the Overall Development Plan for
the Hansen and Kenneth properties, as presented February.22nd.and modified on
March 4, has been accepted by the Planning Commission.
matter of information only, there being no r?equest before the Council for
rezoning at this time.
Report was made as a
STOW COMPANY REQUESTS ACTION TONIGHT ON PETITION FOR REZONING OF SOUTHEAST CORNER
CAHILL ROAD AND W.70TH ST. FOR GASOLINE SERVICE STATION:
DEVELOPMENT OF LAND USE PLAN FOR AREA. Planning Director Hite directed Council's
attention to the minutes of the March 4, 1964 Meeting of the Planning Commission,
rexative to the Stow Company for rezoning the Southeast Corner, Cahill Road and
W.70th St, for use for gasoline service station. Mr. Josiah Brill and Mr. E. C.
Stow were present at Council Meeting, Mr. Brill requesting, on behalf of the
Stow Company, that Council take action this evening to either accept or deny
petition.
Bredesen inquired of Attorney Whitlock as to whether Council must act gonight
in accordance with Mr. Bisill's request for action one way or other on petition.
After his own review of the Planning Commission Minutes of March 4, Mr. Whitlock
replied it is his opinion there is no obligation on the part of the Council to
take action at this time.
equivalent of denial; that there is a limit as to how much Council can delay;
that he expects to go to Court and to say so when the time comes. VanValkenburg,
saying it is his understanding that the petition for rezoning of property at
Southeast Corner, Cahill Road and W.70th St., now under consideration, has been
before the Planning Commission since January of this year and that the Comrnission
is developing a traffic and otherwise comprehensive land use for this area, which
plan should be beneficial to the area, but that this plan has not yet been completed,
moved that the Village Council accept the March 4th recommendation of the Commission-
ACTION DELAYED PENDING
After.review of the Commission Minutes and recommendation, Mayor I
Mr. Brill told Council he feels that delay is
3/16/64
44wnLch is essentially that this Council take no action on the Stow petition for
rezoning tract to gasoline service-station use until such plan is developed.
Motion was seconded by Rixe and carried.
VILLAGE NOTIFIES E. C. STOW CLEANUP OF W.49TH ST. LOT HILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST
PROPERTY IF VILLAGE EIUST INVOKE CLEAN-UP ORDINANCES. On behalf of the Planning
Commission, I&, Hite inquired of Mr. E, C. .Stow, in Mr. Brill's presence, as to
what has happened to-the proposed apartment building at W.49th St. and France
Avenue. Report was made that lot is dirty and.there are big- piles of earth on
it. Mr. Stow was notified that lot must be cleaned up and earth piles taken down,
or Village will invoke its clean-up ordinances and assess the cost of clean-up
against the lot .
2.A.E.ANDERSON REQUEST FOR SIDE YARD VARIANCES AT 5523 ZENITH AVENUE REFERRED
TO VILLAGE ATTORNEY.
Eiaach 4, unfavorable to the request of Z.A.E. Anderson E Son, Inc. for side-yard
variances for Lots 22, 23 and 24, Block 3, Seeley's First Addition (being three
forty-foot lots on which this company expects to construct three dwellings,with
roof overhang one foot closer to side lot line than Ordinance permits.
Hite told Council that inasmuch as most of: the homes on this street are built
on at least 1-1/2 lots, and inasmuch as it is the opinion of the Commission that
the applicant should in no way be encouraged to construct three houses on three
forty-foot lots, the Commission has asked that the Village Attorney investigate
means by which Village could require combination of the three lots into %NO
building Lots. VanValkenburg's motion denying request for side-yard variance,.
and referring matter to Village Attorney for investigation as to possibility -
of Village.!s requiring combination of three lots into two building sites (all in
accordance with Commission's recommendation) was seconded by Rixe and carried.
<
I Council reviewed Planning Commission recommendation of
Mr.
PRELIMINARY PLATS APPROVED,
following Preliminary Plats, which have received Planning Commission's &larch 4th
Planning Director Hite presented to Council the -
recommendat ion for approval :
1. MUIR WOODS, DAVIS REPLAT - Being a four-lot plat, dividing Lot 1,
Block 1, Huir Woods, on East side of Valley View Road just north and
west of the horseshoe bend.
2. CODE'S HIGHVIEW PARK, MAURER REPLAT - This being a two-lot plat,
dividing Lot 12, B1. 1, Codes Highview Park exc, the E. 103,Ft. thereof.
Property is located along the NQ;~ side of W.6Oth St., just Nest of Code.
Chapel Hills Congregational Church on Highway #169. I . 3, BLEASON 2ND ADDITION, - A 30-lot plat situated just north and west of
.VanValkenburg's motion, that Preliminary Plats be approved in accordance with
Planning Commission's recommendations was seconded by Tupa and carried.
PRELIl4INARY-FINAL PLAT OF "=PLAT OF LOTS 3, 4 AND 5, BLOCK 1, IDYLWOOD 4TH ADDN.
Planning Commission's Narch 4th recommendations for approval of this three-lot
replat of a tract along the Vest side of West Highweod Drive and North of Pine
Grove Road as both Preliminary and Final Plat, was' reviewed; and axe moved for
approval- of plat in accordance with Commission's recommendation.
seconded by biacl-lillan and carried.
Motion
CAHILL-DEWEY HILL LAND USE STUDY TO RECEIVE PLANNING COMIKLSSION-COUNCIL ATTENTION '
SATURDAY, MARCH 21.
expects to meet on Saturday, relative to the report of Midwest Planning E Research,
Inc, on the Cahill-Dewey Hill Land Use Study.
meet with the Commission on this matter, Mr. Hite invited to the meeting all
Council members who can attend.
the Metro Rezoning request at the same time.
14r. Hite reported to Council that the Planning Commission
Saying that Council may wish to
He added it may be possible to do some study on
9:30 A.N, set as time of meeting.
COUNCIL VOTES TO ACQUIRE CERTAIN LOTS FOR PARK AND STREET PURPOSES, FROM COUNTY
AUDITOR'S TAX DELINQUENT LIST 11577-C11.
being a list of tax-forfeited lands classified by County Board as %on-conservation"
Hennepin County Board's List If 577-C" ,
and.approved for sale, was reviewed at some length by the Council, together with
the recommendation of the Park Board for acquisition of Lots 8, 20 and 21,
Block 7, Brookview Heights 2nd Addition for Park Purposes, and the recommendation
of Engineer Hite for acquisition of Lot 19, Block 3, Brookview Heights 3rd
Addition for Street Purposes.
to acquire any of the property, the property must be classified as %on-conservation",
and VanValkenburg offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
I ,
It was noted that before Council can take action
RESOLUTION RELATING TO CLASSIFICATION AND SALE OF
IWEREAS, the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Hennepin County,
TAX FORFEITED €!ROPERTIES ---------- (LIST "577-C")
Minnesota, has received from the County Auditor of Hennepin County, PIinnesota a list
of lands in said Village which became the property of the State of Minnesota under
the provisions of law declaring the Sorfeiture of lands to the State for non-payment
of taxes, which said list has been designated as Classification List '*577-C1',
February 25, 1964; and
3/16/64 A$. ?, c WHEREAS, each parcel of land described in said list has heretofore been i classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota
as non-conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by
said Board of County Commissioners:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by said Village Council acting pursuant, to
Minnesota Statutes for 1957, Section 282.01, Subd. 1, that the said classifi-
cation by said Board of County Commissioners of each such parcel of land described
in said list as non-conservation land be and the same is hereby approved and that
the sale of each such parcel of land be and the same is hereby approved.
MoQion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Rixe, and on Rollcall there
were five ayes and no nays, as follows:
VanValkenburg, aye; and Bredesen, aye; a
an, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, aye;
I. (
(
(VanValkenburg then moved that the Village Attorney be directed to make application
on behalf of the Village of Edina for acquisition of the follpwing described tracts
of land, said application to be made to the State of Minnesota and the Board of
Hennepin County Commissioners:
Lots 8, 20 and 21, Block 7, Brookview Heights 2nd Addition - for PARK PURPOSES,
Lot 19, Block 3, Brookview Heights 3gi ~$d.&&3ns-v&2s STREET PURPOSES.
¶ 3
30 ( 0 4 u u
(Motion was seconded by Rixe and carried;/a d
(Some discussion was had concerning four lots--Lots 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 3,
Brookview Heights 3rd Addition-which are exceptionally deep and which.back up to
the Nine-Mile Creek. It was noted that the front of these lots could be buildable
lots, whereas the back of the lots should be acquired for park purposes. Finance
Director Dalen recommended that the Village purchase these four lots outright, at
an appraised value, if it is legal so to do, in order that the Village can make
disposition of the front part of the lots4
acquire by purchase Lots 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 3, Brookview Heights Addition
if it is legal so to do, was seconded by Rixe and carried, by unanimous vote.
VanValkenburg's motion, that Village
GRADING AND GRAVELLING OF DENEY HILL ROAD BETWEEN CENTER AND WOLINES OF SECTION
8, TWP. U6, RANGE 21, TO BE GRADED AND GRAVELLED AS STATE AID PROJECT.
the Council that for some time the Engeer'n
changing the grade of Dewey Hill Road;, t%ct%f%ss%b!&k should be done. before
the Trunk Sewer No. 1-2 improvement is installed.
work be paid for from State Aid Funds, but that Public Hearing be scheduled for
March 30 on proposed improvement, which will mean, besides a change-in the grade,
the widening of the travelled roadway to 36 feet. VanValkenburg's motion, that
Public Hearing on proposed Grading and Gravelling of Dewey Hill Road be
scheduled for Monday, March 30, 1964, was seconded by Tupa and carried.
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER FOR W.6OTH STREET BETWEEN
FRANCE AND XERXES AVENUES DISCUSSED; POSSIBLE STATE AID PROJECT. Mr. Hite
discussed with Council briefly,(and as the result of sentiments expressed by
residents living North of the Crosstown Highway and south-of W.6Oth St. east
of France Avenue, that they use W.6Oth Str rather than W.62nd St.) ways and
means of having this street permanently surfaced. The matter of using State
Aid funds for this project was briefly considered, with Mr. Hite to bring further
report before the Council.
Advising
Department has been considering
He recommended that the
PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 30 AND APRIL 6, 1964, ON SEVERAL PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS.
1964 Ulhility Construction Program" approved by the Courrcil at an earlier meeting,
Engineer Hite presented for Council consideration several proposed.improvements,
advising Council of cost and feasibility of doing work.
Public Hearings be formally scheduled for March 30 and April 6, and VanValkenburg
offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
PROPOSED TRUNK AND LATERAL SANITARY SEWER,
LIFT STATION, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, AND
Pursuant. to previous discussions with Council, and the "Proposed
He requested that
- GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENTS -
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village.of Edina:
1. The Village Engineer, having submitted to the CQuncil a preliminary
report as to'the feasibility of the proposed TRAUNK AND LATERAL SANITARY SEWER,
LIFT STATION, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER, AND GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENTS
described in the Forms of Notice of Hearings set forth below, and as to the
estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed
to be placed on file in the office of the Village Clerk.
3/16/64
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, March 30, 1964, and on Monday,
April 6, 1964, at 7:OO P.M., in the Edina Village Hall, to consider in public
hedings the views of all persons interested in said proposed improvements, said '
-
~ meetings to be in accordance with forms of Notfce of Hearings hereinafter set
forth .
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once
a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publications is to be not
less than Three days from date of said meeting, and to mail notice to owners of
affected properties not later than ten days before date of said meeting, which
notice shall be in substantially the following form:
3. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
(A) ' NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
TRUNK AND LATERAL SANITARY SEWERS
AND LIFT STATION, TRUNK AND LATERAL
WATERMAIN AND STORN SEWERS
EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL will meet at the Edina Village Hall on Monday, March 30, I
1964, at 7:OO P.Ijl., to consider the following proposed improvements to be con- .
structed under'the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chapter 429.
The approximate cost of said improvements is estimated by the Village as set
forth below: ESTIMATED COST
A. CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE TRUNK WATERNAIN AND APPURTENANCES,
AND LATERAL CONNECTIONS THERETO AND APPURTENANCES IN THE
FOLLOWING :
1. Commencing at the intersection of N.70th St. and
/* France Ave.; thence southerly along'France Ave. to W.
76th St.; thence westerly along proposed W.76th St.
and proposed W.76th St, extended to Village well site
in R.L.S. #938 $ 83,312.50
more or less west of S.E. corner of the N1/2 of Sec.9,
T.116,R.21; thence along proposed streets within that
part of the south half of Sections 8 and 9, T.116,R.21,
which is between State Hwy.#lOO and Cahill Rd. to the
center line intersection of Dewey Hill Rd. and Cahill
.I Rd.; thence westerly along Dewey Hill Rd, to the inter-
section of Gleason Rd. as recorded in Schey's Park View
3rd Addn. plat; thence NWly and Nly along said Gleason
Rd. and proposed streets in unnamed proposed plats to
the intersection of Gleason Rd. E Valley View Rd. and
there terminating. $222,005.75
2. . Commencing at a point 120' more or less S. and 50'
Bs CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE LATERAL WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES
IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. Herilane from 1nterlachen.Blvd. north to Cul-de-sac;
Rolling Green Parkway from 1nterlachen:Blvd. north to
Annaway Drive ;
Bywood West from Interlachen Blvd. north to Annaway Drive;
Annaway Drivevfrom Merilane west and north to Cul-de-sac.;
Crescent Terr. from Bywood West to Rolling Green Parkway; kait Lane from Annaway Drive to Nerilane;
Interlachen Blvd. from the west right-of-way line of
Mirror Lakes Dr, extended west .to Bywood'West.
From Merilane cul-de-sac; thence Nly along the east line
of Lot 12, B1. 15 Gunnar Johnson's Second Rearrangement
of Rolling Green to a point 10' S. of the NE corner of said.
Lot on said line; thence Ely 10' S. of and parallel to the
N. line of Lot 1, B1. 1, Walling's Addn, to the E. line of
said lot; thence Ely 85' to a point which is 5' N, of the
N. line of Lot 1, B1. 1, Hilldale LaLone Addn.; thence
Ely 5' N, and parallel to said Lot 1 to the W. right-of-way
line of Circle T?est;.thence to Circle West cul-de-sac.;
From Mait Lane north parallel and 5' W. of the 11. of Lot 7,
B1. 1, Gunnar Johnson's 2nd Rearrangement of Rolling Green,
to the W. line of Lot 4, B1. 1, Gunnar Johnson's 2nd Re-
arrangement of Rolling Green; thence NWly along said W.
line to Annaway Drive.
2, @e'adow Road from W.48th St., N, to cul-de-sac;
White Oaks Road from Meadow Rd. west to existing water-
main at cul-de-sac. $ 13,408.35 '
$ 95,155.43
C. CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE LATERAL SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES
AND LIFT STATION AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. fjlerilane from 625' N. of Interlachen N. to cul-de-sac.;
Bywood West from 900' N. of Interlachen to Annaway Drive;
4nnaway Drive from Merilane west and north to cul-de-sac.;
Rolling Green Parkway from 300' N. of Interlachen to
AnnawaY Drive* ; (Continued next page) /.
3/16/64
Crescent Terrace from Rolling Green Parkway to 47 328' west.;
Mait Lane from Merilane to Annaway Drive $222,013.62
D. CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE'LATERAL SANITARY SEWER AND
APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. Merilane from Interlachen Blvd. to 625' N.;
2. Blake Road from Interlachne Blvd. to'100' S. of
..
Bywood West from Interlachen Blvd. to 783' N.
Scriver Road;
Lake Ridge Rd. from Blake Rd. to cul-de-sac.' '
White Oaks Rd; from Meadow Rd, W. to cul-de-sac;
On an easement line between Lots 5 and 6, Aud.
Subd. #319 from Meadow Rd.xfrlsl southwest to
Townes Rd. cul-de-sac;
Scriver Road from Blake Rd. to cul-de-sac;
3. Meadow Rd. from W.48th St, N. to cul-de-sac;
Townes Rdr from cul-de-sac to 200' west;
Lot 9, Aud. Subd. #319.
' Private drive from Townes Rd. N. to S. line of
E.
' $ 35,781.78
$ 52,659.05
'.
$ 98,839.61: ..
CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES
1.
IN THE FOLLOWING:
Commencing at the intersection of Annaway Drive and
Rolling Green Parkway to pond (between Lots 4 and 5,
Block 1, Gunnar Johnson's Rearrangement of-Rolling
Green) ;
Commencing a t the intersection of Annaway Drive and
Mait Lane to pond (between Lots 54 and 59 Rolling
Green, Section Two);
Commencing at the intersection of Merilane and
Mait Lane to existing storm sewer;
.
Merilane (400' north of Annaway Drive) to pond
(between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Gunnar Johnson's
Rearrangment of Rolling Green) $& 14 1. , 795 66
2. Commencing at Lot A, White Oaks 6th Addn,; thence
southerly on Meadow Road to the intersection of
Meadow Road and White Oaks Road; thence southerly
to low point (Lots.12, 13, 14, 15, White Oaks 4th
Addn. and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, White Oaks 5th Addn.) $ 11,043.09
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed lateral watermain
connections to the trunk watermain under A-1 above includes all lots and tracts of
land abutting the above described location of said watermain.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed trunk watermain
under A-1 above includes all lots and tracts of land within the following described
boundaries:
"Commencing at a point in the east line of the NW1/4, Sec. 32, T.28, R.24, said
point being 240' S, of the N.E. corner thereof; thence W. 240' S. of and
parallel to the N, line of the said NW1/4 to the W. line of said NW1/4; thence N.
to the N,W. corner of Sec. 32, T.28, R.24; thence W. along the center line
of W.7Oth St. a distance of 145'; thence S. parallel to and 145' W. of the
E. line of Sec. 31, T. 28, R.24 to the center line of W.72nd St.; thence
W. along the center line of W.72nd St. to the E. line of South Garden Estates
3rd and 4th Additions extended Ne; thence S. along the E. line of South Garden
Estates 3rd and 4th Additions to the S.E. corner of Lot 10, Block 1, South
Garden Estates 4th Addn.; thence W. along the S. line ofthe N1/2, Sec.31, T.28,
R, 24, to the S.W. corner of the NE1/4 of said Sec. 31; thence S. along the W.
line of the SE1/4 of Sec. 31, T.28, R.24, to the S. W. corner thereof; thence E.
along the S. lines of said Sec. 31 and Sec. 32, T.28,R.24, to a point which
is the W. line of MeadoV Lane I1 Addn.' extended south; thence N. along the W.
line of Meadow Lane *I1 Addn.' to the center line of W.76th St.; thence E. along
the center' line of W.76th St. to a point which is the W. line of LyndaLe Builders
Addn. extended So; thence N. along the W. line of Lyndale Builders Addn. to the
center line of W.75th St.; thence NWly tdthe S.E. co'mer of Lot 7, York Hills
Addn.; thence N, along the E. line oT Lots. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, E 13, York Hills
Addn. to the N.E. corner of Lot 13; thence E. along the N. line 03 Lot I, York
Hills Addn. extended, t'o the center of Sec, 32, T. 28, R. 24; thence N, along the
E. line of the NW1/4 of Sec. 32, T.28, R. 24 to point of beginning."
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed lateral watermain
connections to the trunk watermain under A-2 above includes all lots and tracts of
land abutting the above described location of said watermain.
The area proposed'to be assessed for the cost of the proposed trunk watermain
under A-2 above includes all lots and tracts of land within the following described
boundaries:
3/16 /64
18Commencing at a point which is the center line of Hwy.#lOO and W.70Zh St.;
thence I?. along the center line of W.70th St. to the W. property line of the
Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern R, R. right-of-way; thence SWly along the
V. right-of-way line of the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern R. R. to the
intersection with the N. line of 'the S1/2 of the N1/2 of Sec. 8,T0116,R.21;
thence Wly along said line to the N.V. coher of Lot 6, B1. 1, Prospect Hills
2nd Addn. ; thence Nly to the N:E. corner df Lot 3, B1. 1, Prospect Hills 2nd
Addn.; thence Wly along the S. line of Prospect Hills Addn. to the S.W. corner
thereof which is also the N.E. corner of the S. 10 acres of the NE1/4 ofthe
a1/4 Sec. '7,T.ll6, R.21; thence Wly .%Long the N. line of said S. 10 acres .
to the N.W. corner of said S. 10 acres; thence Sly to th& S.W. corner of the
NE1/4 ofthe NE1/4 of Sec. 7,T.116,R021; thence F?. along the S. line of the
NW1/4 of the NE1/4 and the NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of said Sec. 7 to the center line
of Valley View Road; thence Sly, Vly, and Nly along the center line of Valley
View Road to the S. line of the NEl/4 of the NW1/4 of said Sec. 7; thence \?ly
along the S. line of the NE1/4 of the NW1/4 of said Sec. 7, to a point 950' E.
of the 17. line of Sec. 7, T. 116, R.21; thence S. parallel to and 950' E. of
the 17. line of said Sec. 7 to the S. line of the Nl/2 thereof; thence W. along
the S. line of the N1/2 of said Sec. 7 a distance of 400'; thence S. parallel
to and 550' E. of the W. line of said Sec. 7 to the S. line of Sec. 7,'T.116,
R. 21; thence E. along the S. lines of Sec. 7 and Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21, to
the S.E. corner of said Sec. 8; thence N. along the center line of Hwy.#lOO
to point of beginning .It
watermain under B-1 above includes all lots and tracts of land abutting the
above described location of the watermain.
watermain under B-2 above includes all lots and tracts of land abutting the
above described location of the watermain.
and lift station under C-1 above includes all lots and tracts of land abutting
the above described location of the sanit'ary sewer.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
under D-1 above includes all lots and tracts of land abutting the above desc6ibed
location ofthe sanitary sewer.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
under D-2 above includes all lots and tracts of land abutting the above described
location of the sanitary sewer.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
under D-3 above includes all lots and tracts of land abutting the above described
location' of the sanitary sewer.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed storm sewer
under E-1 above includes Lots 5, Part of 6, Part o f 7, Part of 8 (parcellOOO),
Part of 8 (parcel11011, 9, 10, 11, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, Part of 24 (parcel
29251, Part of 25 (parcel 29351, Part of 25 and 26 (parcel 29451, Part of 26,
Part of 27,Part of 28, 29 and 41, all in Rolling Green; Lots 46, 47, 48, 49,
50, 41, 52, 53, 54, 59 and 59A, 60 and 60A, a31 inRolling Green Section Two;
Lot 1, and 2, Block 1, in Rplat of Lot 30, Rolling Green; Lot 1 in Replat of
part of Lot 31, Rolling Green; 'Lots I$ 2, 3,' 4, and 5, Biock 1, in Gunnir '
Johnson's Rearrangement, Rolling Green; Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11 and 12, Block 1,- all in 'Gunnar Johnson's Second Rearrangement, Rolling
Green; Lot 1, Block 1, Rolling Green, Bush Replat; Lot 1, Block 1, Walling's
Addition; Lots 6, 7, and 8, Blockl, Carlson's Park; Lot 1, Block 1, Replat of
Part of Lot 6, Rolling Green; Parcel 5600 in the N1/2 of Sec. 29,T.117,R.21.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed storm sewer
under E-2 above includes all lot's and tracts of land within the following descrided
boundaries:
"Comencing at the csnter line of France Ave. and W.46th St.; thence S.' along
the center line of France Ave. to the center line of W.47th St.; thence W.
along the center line of W.47th St. extended to a point- 495' W. of the center
line of; France Ave.; thence Nly to a point on the N. line of Lbt 4, Aud. Subd.
#319, said point being 100' E. of the N.N.' corner thereof; thence Nly to a
point on the most Nly line of Lot' 5, Aud. Subd.#319, said point being 100'
NEly from the NOW. corner thereof; thence NWly to the N.W. corner if Lot 6,
Aud.Subd.#319; thence NWly to the N.W.' corner of Lot 7, Aud. Subd.8319; Fhence
Nly to a point in the N. line of ]Lot 8, kud. Subd.#319, said point being 200'
W. of the N.E. corner of said Lot 8; thence E. to the point of beginning."
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed lateral
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed lateral
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
* ,
I
GRETCHEN Sa ALDEN
Village Clerk
(B) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ON
SANITARY SEWERS, LIFT STATION,
WATERMAINS, AND GRADING AND GRAVELLING
EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL will meet at the Edina Village Hall on Monday, April 6,
1964, at 7:OO P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be con-
structed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes 1961, Chapter 429.
The approximate cost of said improvements is estimated by the Village as set
fisth below:
3/16/64
ESTIMATED COST 7 4'9
A. CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE LATERAL SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTE-
NANCES AND LIFT STATION AND APPURTEHANCES IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. West 65th Street from Parnell Ave, to Virginia Ave.;
From W.65th St. south 303' on a line parallel to
and 152.66' east of the center line of 'Parnell Ave.;
Virginia Ave, from W.65th St, to 427' (more or less)
north 1
B. CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE LATERAL SANITARY SEWERS AND
APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING:
1, Parnell Ave. from W.65th St. to 520' (more or less)
2, West 65th St. from 5' west of the east line of Drew
3,
4. Cleveland Ave, from Division St, to 600' south.
C. CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE LATERAL WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES
IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. Parnell Ave. from W,65th St, to 400' (more or less)
southo
Ave. extended to 340' west,
north 860 feet.
West line of Devco property Erom proposed W,65th St.
south; thence easterly and parallel to W,65th St. a
distance of 143' (more or less); thence northerly
and parallel to Parnell Ave, to W.65th St.;
West 65th St. from Parnell to Virginia Ave.;
Virginia Ave. from W,65th St, to 210' (more or
less) north of W.64th St.; thence northwesterly
along the south Blvd, of the Cross-Town Hwy.
service lane to Parnell Ave,;
Parnell Ave. from Cross-Town Hwy.service lane to
Wo64th St.
2. Woodcrest Drive from Park Place to south line of
3, W.65th St. from Barrie Rd, to France Ave.;
4*
Lot 1, Block 2, Shady Pines Addn,
Drew Ave. from W.65th St, to 435' south.
Highway #169-212 from Gleason Rd, west to east
line of Gleason's 1st Addn.;
East line of Gleason's 1st Addn. from Hwy.#169-212
to 480' north, which is ~~59th St, extended;
W.59th St, from east line of Gleason's 1st Addn,
to Walnut Drive ;
Walnut Drive from W.59th St. north to Nine Mile Creek
CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING AND GRAVELLING IN THE FOLLOWING:
1. Cleveland Ave. from Division St. to Hollywood Rd.
B.
i
$ 23,684.19 .
$ 4,853.63
$ 7,486.47
$ 7,669.05 '
$ 8,442.44
$ 22,375.13
$ 14,168.92
$ 24,428.56'
$ 29,790.87
$ 10,261.46
The area proposed to be assessed for.the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
and lift station under A-1 above includes Lot 2, Block 1, Hubers Addn.; Lot 2,
Block 1, Wal-Don Builder's 1st Addn.; Lot 3 (E1/2), and Lot 5 (E1/2), Block 12,
Normandale Addn.; Lots 1 (E1/2), L (W1/2), 2 (E1/2), 2 (W1/2), 3 (E1/2), 3 (W1/2),
Block 19', NormandaLe Addn.; Lot 12, Block 11, Normandale Addn.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
under B-1 above includes Lots 1 (E1/2), 2 (E1/2), 3 (E1/2), 4 (E1/2) and 5, Block
18, Normandale Addn.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
under B-2 above includes Lots 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
under B-3 above includes Lot 1, Block 1, Southdale Acres.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed sanitary sewer
under B-4 above includes Lots 1 thru 12 incl,, Block 3; Lots 13 thru 24, incl,,
Block 4, all in Clevelands Subdivision of Blocks 2, 3, 4, 13, 14 and 15, of
Emma Abbott Park,
C-1 above includes Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, Replat of Block 9, Normandale Addn.; Lots 1
and 2, Block 1, Hubers Addn,; Lot 2, Block 1, Wal-Don Builder's 1st Addn.; Lots 3
(31/2), 5 (E1/2), Block 12, Normandale Addn.; Lots 1 (E1/2), 2 (E1/2); 3 (E1/2);
4 (E1/2), and 5 (E1/2), Block 18, Normandale Addn; Lots 1 (E1/2), 2 (E1/2), 3 (E1/2),
1 (W1/2), 2 (W1/2, and 3 (W1/2), Block 19 , Normandale Addn. ; Lot 12, Block 11,
Normandale Addn,
C-3 above includes Lots 5 thru 12 incl., Block 1; and Lots 5 thry 9 incl.,
Block 2, Minnehaha loods Addn,
C-3 above includes Lots 1, 2 and 3, Cassin's Outlots; and Lot 3, Block 4,
Southdale Acres. .,
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed watermain under
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed watermain under
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed watermain under
-
50 L 3/16/64
)The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed watermain under
Cp4 above includes Lots 1 thru 6 incl., Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 7 incl.,
Block 3; all in Walnut Ridge 1st Addn.; Lots 1, 3, 4 and 8, Block 1, Gleason's 1st
Addn.; and Parcel#5410, Sec. 31, T1157,R.21.
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost ofthe proposed grading and
gravelling under B-1 above includes Lots 1 thru 12 incl., Block 3; Lots 13 thru 24
incl., Block 4, all in Clevelands Subdivision of Blocks 2, 3, 4, 13,14 & 15 of Emma Abbott Park. ... -
GRETCHEN S. ALDEN
Vi'llage Clerk
Motion for adoption ofthe Resolution was seconded by fdaclillan, and on Rollcall
there were five ayes and no nays, as follows:
VanValkenburg, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and the I
BIDS AUTHORIZED FOR APRIL 6, ON PROPOSED DEWEY HILL ROAD IMPROVEMENT.
by Council of plans and specifications for the proposed Grading Improvement in Dewey
After review
Hill Road, and Engineer's advice that bids should be taken as early as possible so
that work might be done before Trunk Sewer- Improvement, MacMillan offered the following
Resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PROPOSED GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVENENT AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISElENT FOR BIDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina:
set forth- in the following Advertisement for bids form, heretofore'prepare'd by the
Village Engineer and now on file in the office of the Village Clerk are hereby
approved. -
I . 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published twhe in the Edina-Morningside'
improvement: ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed Grading abd Graveling ImpFovement
/Courier and the Construction Bulletin the following notice for bids for said
GRADING AND BASE
SEALED BIDS MILL BE RECEIVED and opened in the Council Chambers in the Edina Village
Hall, 4801 W.SOth St., at 11:OO A.M., Monday, April 6, 1964, and the Edina Village
Council will meet at 7:OO P;M., on 14onday, April 6, 1964, to consfder saiil bids,
being for the following:
Dewey Hill Road between center of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21 and west line'
of Section 8, Township 116j Range 21.
I CONSTRUCTION OF THE GRADING AND BASE IN THE FOLLONXNG STREET:
- percent of amount of base bid.
The Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL.
GRETCHEN Sa ALDEN
Village Clerk
3. Each and a11 of the terms of the foregoing advertisement for
adopted as the terms and conditions of award of the contract for said
Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of
the Village Clerk.
(by check), which deposit will be refunded upon-return of said plans and specifications,
No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by cash deposit, bid bond or
certified check payab3.e to the Village Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10)
Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $10.00
bids are hereby
improvement.
lkenburg, aye; and Bredesen, aye; and th
REQUESTS RELATIVE TO ZONING CHANGES TO RECEIVE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON APRIL 6,
Mr. Hite directed Council's attention to the Planning Commission's cecommendations
of March 4, favorable to the following requests:
//(I)
(2)
Request of H. J, Idayer, 5128 Bedford Avenue, for Variance to permit construction
of a dwelling on the South 40 feet of Lot 8, Block 7, Brookside Heights Addn.
Petition of Mr. H.14. Schoening, 5700 Blake Road for the rezoning from Open
Development District to R-2 MULTIP& RESIDENCE DISTRICT of the South 152 Ft. of
Tract A, Registered Land Survey #345 (tract between 5700 and 5708-10 So.Blake Rd.)
and asked that Council schedule public hearings on these requests for April 6.
was so moved, by motion Rixe, seconded by MacMillan and carried.
It
5%. . 3/16/64
AMENDMENT TO FOOD ORDINANCE (NO. 151) ADOPTED. Council discussed Amendment to
Village Food Ordinance, advocated by Sanitarian Hensley; and VanValkenburg offere'd
the following Ordinance, moving that Council dispense with Second Reading and
adopt Ordinance as submitted:
i4'
ORDINANCE NO. 151A-3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 151A,
RELATING TO THE SALE OF FOOD, AND REQUIR- .
ING LICENSING OF PERISHABLE FOOD VEHICLES.
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The first section (Definitions) of Ordinance No. 151A of
the Village, regulating and requiring licensing of food establishments and food
vending machines, is hereby amended by substituting for the definitions of "Home
Prepared Food" and Wholesome11 %herein new definitions reading as follows:
pared,in a place other than a licensed food establishment or a food establishment
exempted from licensing requirements of this ordinance by Section 4 hebeof,
ways fit for human food.
The following definition is hereby added to said section:
port perishable foods as herein.defined within or into the Village for delivery
therein.
The definition of
"Home Prepared Food" means any food which has been processed or pre-
Wholesome" means sound, healthful, clean, unadulterated and in all
"Perishable food vehicle" means any food vehicle which is used to trans-
is hereby deleted $ram said section.
Section 2.
adding "perishable food vehicle" to the list of types of enterprises therein set
forth which require a license. "Perishable food vehicle" shall also be added to
the list of enterprises therein whch do not require a food establishment license.
There shalPalso be added to said section the following:
person in the same business in the Village, he may obtain a fleet license therefor
in lieu of a separate license for each vehicle.
or revoked, such suspension or revocation shall affect every vehicle licensed
thereunder ,
There shall also be added to said section the following:
"When five or more readfly perishable food vehicles are operated by the
same person in the same business in the Village, he may obtain a fleet license
therefor in lieu of a separate license for each vehicle,
is suspended or revoked, such suspension or revocation shall affect every vehicle
licensed thereunder."
The second section of said ordinance is hereby amended by
"When five or more perishable food vehicles are operated by the same
If such fleet license is suspended
If such fleet license
Section 3. There is hereby added to the schedule of license fees set
forth in Section 5 of said ordinance the following:
"Perishable Food Vehicle:
Perishable Food Vehicle, fleet license: $25.00 per annum.
Readily Perishable Food Vehicle , fleet license: $25.00 per annum,"
$5,00 per annu.
Section 4, Paragraphs (c) and (d) of Section 7 of said ordinance are
hereby amended to read as follows:
Posting or Other Service of Inspection Report,
shall deliver the inspection report to the licensee or any of his agents or employees
on the premises, or he may post it on an inside wall of the food establishment.
When so posted, the report shall not be defaced or removed by any person except the
Health Officer,
hereunder.
of the Health Department
ment having a report so served which gives notice of one or more violations of this
ordinance, shall within the period or periods of time stated in the report remove
or correct each violation stated therein. The failure to remove each violation so
stated within the required time shall constitute a separate offense hereunder.I1
"(c) The Health Officer
Such delivery or pasting shall constitute service of the report
Another copy of the inspection report shall be filed with the records
"(d) Correction of Violation. Any owner or operator of a food establish-
Section 5.
''(g) Coved Corners. All floors hereafter constructed or extensively
Paragraph 't'g) of Section 10 of ,said ordinance is hereby
amended to read as follows:
reconstructed in food-preparation or utensil-washing areas shall be coved at the
junction of the floors and walls, at the junction of the floors and the risers of
masonry curbs, and at the junction of the floors and equipment placed on the
floors
Section 6.
"(j) Ice,
Paragraph (j) of Section 16 of said ordinance is hereby
All ice shall be manufactured only from safe water which has
amended to read as follows:
been obtained from a safe water supply.
single service containers, or in utensils which are clean and which have been
subjected to bactericidal treatment. Buckets, scoops, and ice containers, unless
they are single-service utensils, shall be made of a smooth, impervious material,
and designed to facilitate cleaning, They shall be clean at all times.
containers shall not be used. If Ice-crusheps are used, they should be easily
- Ice shall be handled and transported in
Canvas
- *-.. . -- ..
3/16/64 52 ..
cleanable.
tb bactericidal treatment before use and shall be covered when not in use.
They shall be maintained in a clean condition and shall be subjected
Section 7.
"(c)
Paragraph (c) of Section 19 of said ordinance is hereby
Design. All food-contact susfaces shall be readily accessible
amended to read as follows:
for cleaning and inspection, either without being disassembled, by disassembling
without use of tools, or by easy disassembling with the use of only simple tools
such as a mallet, a screwdriver, or an open-end wrench, kept available near the
equipment. The food-contact surfaces shall be free of sharp internal-corners or
difficult-to-clean crevices. All equipment installed on or after the passage of
this ordinance shall comply with Standards 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,C-l and C-2 of the
National Sanitation Foundation when applicable, which numbered standards are
hereby adopted and incorporated by reference.
for official copies, shall be kept on file in the office of the Village Clerk
for use and examination by the public.
shall not be installed until it has beenaapproved by the Health Officer.11
Three copies thereof, marked
Equipment not covered by said standards
Section 8. Except for Sections 2 and 3 hereof, this ordinance shall be
in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication.
2 and 3 shall bedome effective on April 1, 1964,
Notion for waiver of second reading and for adoption of Ordinance as submitted was
seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there we
MacHillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, aye; VanValke
Secttons
*
'Village Clerk
PRDINANCE LICENSING MILK HAUERS ADOPTED. This Ordinance, under discussion at
/intervals since a challenge to Village's licensing of milk plants not actually
located in Edina, was brought once again to Council's attention because ofthe
expiration of the license year on April 1.
Ordinance, moving that second reading be waived and Ordinance adopted as submitted:
VanValkenburg offered the following
ORDINANCE NO. 123-1 * AN ORDINANCE ANENDING ORDINANCE NO. 123 I AS TO LICENSING OF MILK PRODUCERS AND
HAULERS
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
to read as follows:
distributors and operators of milk plants required by Section 3 of said unabridged
ordinance to secure a permit shall secure a license &om the Village.
"permit" in said unabridged form shall be understood to mean a lllicensell. The li-
cense fee shall be $100 per annum for a licensee maintaining a plant in the Village,
or, for other licensees, $10 per annum for each truck used to deliver milk or milk
products in the Village.
the operator may obtain a fleet license therefor inlieu of a separate license for
each puck.
license is suspended or revoked, such suspension or revocation shall affect every
vehicle licensed thereunder,"
Section 2.
upon its passage and publication.
Motion for waiver of second reading thereof andcadoption of Ordinance as submitted
was seconded by Tupa, and on Rollcall there were five ayes and no nays, as follows:
MacHillan, aye; axe, aye; Tupa, aye; VanVaUenbur ,
Section 1.
"Section 2. License Required. All milk producers, milk haulers, milk
Section 2 of Ordinance No. 123 of the Village is hereby amended
The word
When five or more trucks are so used for the same business,
The fee for a fleet license shall be $50 per annum. If such fleet
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect inmiediately
aye; and Bredesen, aye; and
the Ordinance was adopted. 77
ORDINANCES AMENDING ORDINANCE LICENSING PLUMBERS, AND ADOPTING ALL SECTIONS OF
IUNNEAPOLIS PLUMBING CODE EXCEPT 130,060, ADOPTED BY VILLAGE COUNCIL.
on Plumbing--the first to bring licensing requirements, and bonds, into line with
other licensing requirements of the Village, and the second to adopt by reference
the Minneapolis Plumbing Code, with exception of Section 130.060, were submitted
for Council action. These ordinances $ad been recommended by Plumbing Inspector
Blumberg, and also advocated by/%gep?wnbers in the interests of uniformity.
Hayor Bredesen told Council he disliked the llfeatherbeddingl' clauses in the
14inneapolis plumbing code,
Ordinance No. 66A, which reads as follows, and adopt Ordinance as submitted:
Two Ordinances
VanValkenburg moved that Council dispense wi-th second reading of proposed
3/16/64
ORDINANCE NO. 66A
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE
LICENSING OF PLUMBERS AND
PROVIDING A PENALTY: REPEALING i””
ORDINANCE NO. 66
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. License Required for Plumbing Work.
on the business of plumbing within the Village or make any connection whatever
with the water pipes, water mains, branch sewers, main sewers, main drains or
other service pipes of the Village, or make any repairs, additions or alterations
of any pipe, tap, stopcock, water closet or any other fixture-connected with or
designed to be connected with the water works or sewer system of the Village
without first having obtained a license,
Ordinance No. 20 of the Village, including the penalty provisions thereof, shall
apply to all licenses required.by this ordinance and to the holders of such
licenses .
shall contain or have attached thereto, in addition to the information required
by said Ordinance No. 20, a written recommendation signed by at least two master
plumbers licensed by the state, recommending the applicant as a person regularly
educated to the business, of good reputation and thoroughly qualified to carry on
the business of a licensed plumber.
master plumber under the laws of this state, and he shall, in addition, furnish
such other evidence or pass such examination or both as the Council shall from
time to time require regarding the experience and qualifications of applicants
to engage in said business.
Applicants for licenses or renewals of licenses shall
file with each application a bond running to the.Village in the penal sum of
$2000, which bond shall be conditioned that the applicant shall in all respects
well and faithfully perform all things by him undertaken in the making of all
connections, repairs or taps of any kind with the water mains or pipes connected
with the water works system of the Village, and shall save the Village harmless of
and from a11 accidents and damages consequent thereto or by reason of any opening
in any street, lane or avenue made by him or by any person in his employ, for the
purpose of putting down service pipes cpnnecting with the water works oE the Vil-
lage, and that he will restore all streets, lanes and avenues excavated by him
to their former good condition, and will keep and maintain said streets, lanes
and avenues in good condition, to the satisfaction of the Council for the period
of one year next thereafter, and that he will pay all penalties imposed upon
him by the Council for the violation of any rule or regulation of the Water Works
Department, and shll strictly comply with and do all things required by the
ordinances of the Village.
conditions as the one above specified, covering his acts in making connections with
or repairs on any service pipe connecting with the sewer system of the Village.
Such bonds shall be submitted in form corresponding to the forms on file
in the office of the Village Clerk. Copies thereof shall be available to all
applicants without charge.
authorized to act as such under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
any bond be required of, any journeyman plumber who is employed only as such.
be $50 for the first license and $25 for each renewal license.
No person shall carry
Sec. 2. License Procedure or Control; Penalties. The provisions of
Sec. 3, Application. The application for license or renewal of license
The applicant shall hold a license as a
Sec. 4, - Bond,
The applicant shall also file a like bond in a like amount and upon the same
The surety thereon shall be a corporation duly
Provided, that the provisions of this section shall not applyto, nor shall
Sec. 5, - Fee. The fee for the license required by this ordinance shall
Sec. 6. Violations to be Reported. The Plumbing Inspector of the
Village shall notify the Village Manager or his deputy of any violation of any of
the provisions of any ordinance of the Village touching the duties of plumbers
which shall come under his observation.
Sec. 7. Penalty.. Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and subject to a fine of not exceeding $100 or .imprisonment in
the Village or county jail for a period of not exceeding 90 days, with costs of
prosecution in either case to be added. Such penalty may be imposed in addition
to revocation or suspension of license.
suspended upon the effective date thereof,
.
Sec. 8. Repeal, Ordinance No. 66,of the Village is hereby rgpealed and
Sec. 9, Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective immediately
upon its passage and publication.
Motion for waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 66A as submitted,
Bredesen, nay; and
dinance was adopted.
3/16/64 WA Kd
VanValkenburg then offered for adoption proposed Ordinance No. 67A, moving that
Council dispense with second reading thereof and adopt said Ordinance, reading
as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 67A
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING PLUMBING AND GAS FITTING . WORK, ADOPTING THE MINNEAPOLIS .
PLWBING CODE BY REFERENCE, AND
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 67, AS AMENDED
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
by reference the Plumbing Code of the City of Ninneapolis, being Chapters 130 to
132, inclusive, of the Minneapolis Ordinance Code of July 1, 1960, with all amend-
ments subsequently made thereto, as the regulations which shall apply in the Vil-
lage of Edina for the installation, extension or alteration of all plumbing, except
that Section 130.060 of said Code shall not be effective in the Village.
therein to the llCityll shall be construed as referring to the Village; all references
therein to "Inspector of Buildings" or "Department of Buildings1' shall be construed
as referring to the Village's Plumbing Inspector; and all references therein to
"Commissioners of Health11 or '"Department of Health" shall be construed as referring
to the Village Health 0fficer.or the Village Public Health Sanitarian, either one
or both.
Section 1. Minneapolis Plumbing Code Adopted.. There is hereby adopted
In the application and interpretation of said Code, a11 references
Sec. 2. Ninneapolis Plumbing Permit Fees Adopted. There is also hereby
adopted by reference Chapter 203 (Plumbing Permit Fees) of said blinneapolis Ordi-
nance Code of July 1, 1960, as the schedule of fees for permits for all plumbing
work in the Village of Edina for which a permit is required.
therein to rrCityll shall be construed as referring to the Village; and all references
therein to "Inspector of Buildings" shall be construed as referring to the Village's
Plumbing Inspector.
is also hereby adopted by reference Chapter 133 (Gas Piping Installation) and
Chapter 113 (Gas Burner Installations) of said Winneapolis Ordinance Code of
July 1, 1960, with all amendments subsequently made thereto, as the regulations
which shall apply in the Village of Edina for the installation of gas piping and
burners..
Village; all references therein to "Department of Buildings" or "Inspector of
Buildings" or "Plumbing Division of the Department of Buildings" shall be construed
as referring to the Plumbing Inspector of the Village; and all references therein
to "City Treasurer" shall be construed as referring to the Village Treasurer.
Kinneapolis Gas Fitting Permit Fees Adopted.
adopted by reference Chapter 204 (Gas Fitting Permit Fees) of said IiIinneapolis Ordi-
nance Code of July 1, 1960, with all amendments subsequently made thereto, as the
schedule of fees for permits for all gas fitting work in the Village of Edina for
which a permit is required.
All references
Sec. 3. Minneapolis Gas Piping Installation Ordinances Adopted. There
All references therein to "City1' shall be construed as referring to the
I Sec. 4. There is also hereby
All reserences therein to "Inspector of Buildings"
.'t shall be construed as referring to the Plumbing Inspector of the Village.
Sec. 5. Official Copies on File. Three copies of the ordinances above
described, together with three copies of each code or standard referred to in said
ordinance; shall be marked as official copies and filed for use and examination
by the public in the office of the Village Clerk.
shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication and upon filing
of the official copies as provided in section 5 above; provided, that when a per-
mit for any work regulated hereby was issued prior to the effective date hereof,
and has not since its issuance been revoked for good cause, the work permitted
thereby may be completed under the provisions of the ordinances relating thereto
in effect on the date of such issuance.
repealed and superceded upon the effective date hereof.
Any person violating this ordinance shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor, and subject to a fine of not exceeding $100 or imprisonment in
the Village or county jail for a.period of not exceeding 90 days, with costs of
prosecution in either case to be added.
Motion for adoption of Ordinance without. second reading was seconded by MacMillan,
Sec. 6. Effective Date: Effect on Outstanding Permits. This ordinance
Sec. 7. Repeal. Ordinance No. 6.7 of the Village, as amended, is hereby
Sec. 8. Penalty.
*.
LIFE-TIME BICYCLE LICENSES TO BE SOLD UNDER NEW ORDINANCE. This Ordinance, recommended
for passage by Police Chief Wayne Beanett, will eliminate the three-year bicycle license,
and substitute therefor a ltlife-timell license, with a fee of $2.00 and license to be
valid for as long as the bicycle remains in the family.
Council dispense with second reading of Ordinance No. 41A, and adopt said Ordinance
as submitted, as follows:
VanValkenburg moved that
3/16/64
ORDINANCE NO. 41A
AN ORDINANCE FXGULATING OPEMTION AND
REQUIRING LICENSING OF BICYCLES, AND
PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION ;
REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 41,.AS AMENDED.
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, OR~AINS:
Section 1. License Required. No person shall ride or use a bicycle
upon any public street, highway, or boulevard, such bicycle being owned by a
resident of the Village or customarily kept or stored at a place within the Village,
unless the same shall be licensed as herein provided.
Ordinance No. 20 of the Village, including the penalty provisions thereof, shall
apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders of such licenses,
except as herein otherwise provided.
Section 3. - Fee,
shall be $2.00.
Section 4, Expiration Date, Such license shall be valid as long as the
bicycle remains the property of the licensee.
another resident of the Village, a new license shall be obtained by the gransferee
within five days after transfer of ownership.-
the licensee a suitable tag, plate, seal or other device which shall be attached to
the frame of the licensed bicycle. A registration card shall be issued which shall
show the name of the licensee, the name of the manufacturer of the bicycle and its
frame number, the type of bicycle, the license number and the date of issue. The
Village shall keep the same information by means of a duplicate registration card.
The approval of the Village Manager shall not be required for the issuance of any
license hereunder,
pay over to the Village Treasurer all fees received pursuant to this ordinance.
Chief of Police shall have the powers and duties of the Village Ranager or his deputy
to enforce the provisions of this ordinance and Ordinance No. 20, with respect to
bicycles licensed hereunder and their owners and operators,
isfactory evidence of loss of a license plat or registration card issued hereunder,
a new license plate or card, or both, shall be issued upon payment of a fee of 75e.
No person shall willfully
or maliciously remove, destroy, mutilate or alter the frame number of any bicycle
licensed hereunder, or any license tag, plate, seal or other device or registration
card as long as the licensing of the bicycle hereunder is in effect; provided, that
nothing herein shall be deemed to prohibit the Village Clerk or other agent of the
Village from stamping numbers on the frames of bicycles on which no serial number
can be found or on which said number is illegible or insufficient for purposes of
identification,
has been impounded under the provisions of Section 9 of Ordinance No, 20 shall be
surrendered upon payment of the license fee, an impounding fee of 50e and a storage
of lo$ for each day of storage after the first 24 hours.
one required to be licensed hereunder, no fee shall be paid to the Village.
be deemed to be granted subject: to the following conditions:
a manner as to interfere with any pedestrian thereon;
or sidewalk except in a prudent and careful manner and unless such person shall be
capable of efficient control and operation of the bicycle; nor shall any person pro-
pelling or operating a bicycle upon a public street, highway, or sidewalk carry or
permit to be carried any other person upon such vehicle;
shall be operated with reasonable regard to the safety of the operat,or and other
persons upon the streets and other public highways;
Persons riding bicycles shall observe all traffic signs and stop at
all stop signs;
No bicycle shall be permitted on any street or other public highway
between 30 minutes after sunset and 30 .minutes before sunrise without a headlight
visible from the front thereof for not less than 500 feet, indicating the approach
or presence of the bicycle, firmly attached to such bicycle and properly lighted
nor without a red taillight, or in lieu thereof, a reflector attached to and visible
from the rear of such bicycle for a distance of not less than 200 feet;
(f) No person under the age of 16 years shall ride or propel such bicycle
upon any street,.highway or sidewalk abreast of any other person so riding or pro-
pelling a bicycle; and
(9) Every person riding OF propelling a bicycle upon any street, highway
or sidewalk shall observe all traffic rules and regulations applicable thereto and
shall turn only at intersections, signal for a11 tarns, ride at the right-hand side
of the street or highway, pass to the left when passing and overtaking vehicles that
are slower moving, and pass to the right when meeting.
Section 2. License Procedure and Control; Penalties. The provisions of
The fee for the license required by this ordinance
Whenever ownership is transferred to I
Section 5. License Plate and Registration Card. There shall be issued to
Section 6. Administration. The Village Clerk shall, at least once a month,
The
Section 7. Replacement of Lost License or Card. Upon application and sat-
Section 8. Destruction of Frame or License.
Section 9. Impounding. A bicycle required to be licensed hereunder which
If the bicycle is not
Section 10, Conditions of license. Every license issued hereunder shall
(a) No person shall ride or propel any bicycle upon any sidewalk in such
(b) No person shall ride or propel a bicycle upon a public street, highway
(c) No bicycle shall be ridden faster than is reasonable and proper, but
(d)
(e)
3/16/64
Section 11. Application to Unlicensed Vehicles. The conditions and re-
gulations prescribed in Section LO above apply to all bicycles operated upon any
public street, highway or sidewalk-of this Village whether or not licensed here-
under .
its usual and accepted meaning, but shall not include any motorcycle or other
vehicle to which a license is issued under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Summary Revocation of License.
when notified of any violation of this ordinance, summarily order the suspension
of a license issued hereunder for a period of time not to exceed 90 days.
licensee shall thereupon surrender the license plate and registration card issued
under the suspended license to the Village Police Department, to be returned to
him after expiration of the period of suspension.
guilty of a misdemeanor, and subject to a fine of not.exceeding $100 or imprinson-
ment in the Village or County jeil for a period of not exceeding 90-days, with
costs of prosecution in either case to be-added.
addition to revocation or suspension of license,
Section 15. Repeal.
hereby repealed and rescinded.
Section 16. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its
passage and publication in accordance with law.
Section 12. Terms Defined. The term "bicycle" as used herein shall have
"i" '
Section 13. The Chief of Police may,
The
Section 14. Penalty. Any person violating this ordinance shall be
Such penalty may be imposed, in
Ordinance No. 41 of the Village, as amended, is
Motion for waiver of second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 4lA as submitted
was-seconded by Rixe, and on Rollcall there were
Maclqillan, aye; Rixe, aye; Tupa, aye; VanValkenb
the Ordinance was adopted.
WALTER ROBILLLARI), 6112 RIDGENAY ROAD, APPOINTED AS MEMBER OF PARK BOARD,
Bredesen's appointment of bbm Walter Robilliard, 6112 Ridgeway Road, as member of
Park Board for three-year term expiring December 31, 1966, was confirmed by
Mayor
- unanimous vote of Council.
VILLAGE MANAGER TERMS EDINA' S MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORELDEERBTION "BASICALLY A RELATIVELY
GOING CONCERN1*.
31, 1963; Comparative Statement of Income and Expense, Twelve msnths ended December 31
1963, and December 31, 1962; and Comparative Operating Expenses statement for
year 1963, showing comparison of expenses in W.50th St. and Southdale Stores.
Reports showed that at December 31, 1963 the Liquor Dispensary Fund had assets
of $530,260.95, liabilities of $19,030.02, and Total Surplus of $511,230.93; that
Net Sales increased from a Total for both stores of $1,432,307.36 in 1962 to a
Total of $1,480,951.19 in 1963 (Nr.Dalen's estimate having been $1,500,000); and
that Net Income increased from $253,372.47 to $262,258.90.
Manager that Liquor Store Operation in Edina is llbasically a relatively going
concern".
llCOOPERATIVE FORESTER1' PROPOSAL APPROVED BY COUNCIL ON YEAR'S TRIAL. Presenting
to the Council a proposal for a "cooperative Forester" to serve Bloomington,
Richfield, St.Louis Park and Edina at total cost of $10,00O--which cost would be
divided equally among the four municipalities, Mr. Hyde told Council he feels it
is worth $2,500 to Edina to have the services of someone who is qualified in
Forestry, in view of the inroads Dutch Elm Disease is making in klinnesota now.
He said the plan is for this forester to spend one day each week in each of the
participating communities, and on the fifth day showing community personnel
what needed to be done; that training in dutch elm disease will be regular part
of program.
1963.
remain a cooperative one if it is so approved, and not be extended to full-time
Edina position.
relative to the "cooperative forester" be accepted and that this arrangement
be tried for one year, was seconded by Tupa and carried.
COUNCIL ASKS ADDITIONAL TEN PERCENT FROM MORNINGSIDE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES.
Petition of the Village of Morningside for a combined Police-and-Fire Contract
to commence on October 28, 1964, whereby Edina will supply to Morningside both
police and fire service at a rate calculated by applying the police and fire
department expendigures to the combined Edina-lilorningside valuation,lwhich
would mean a payment by Norningside to Edina of approximately $14,000, was
reviewed by Council and discussed; this being one method suggested by Manager
Hyde to Morningside, for computing costs of the service. Manager Hyde had
noted in his letter to Norningside that administrative costs have not been
allocated in the expenses; and Mayor Bredesen suggested that an additional
ten percent be added to Morningside's cost to provide for its share of
administrative cost. Mr. Hyde infomed Council that agreeing to serve
Nanager Hyde presented to the Council Balance Sheet as at December I
Council agreed with
He added the cost to Edina will be some $1,700 for the balance of
Some discussion was had, Mayor Bredesen advocating that this position
VanValkenburg's motion, that Manager Hyde's recommendation I.
c
3/16/64
Morningside will not change Edina's fire insurance rates (Class 6); that
he is still investigating the possibility of having Fire Pension Fund receive
the 2% Fire Insurance Premium from Morningside.
to inform Village of Momkingside that Council will consider contract for
Police and Fire Service on the basis for which they petitioned, plus an additional
ten percent for administrative costs.
Council directed Manager Hyde
COUNCIL DISAPPROVES "MUNICIPAL PERSONNEL SURVEY" AS PROPOSED BY STANTON-
PITTELKOW AND ASSOCIATES. Manager Hyde presented to the Council the proposal
for a "Municipal Personnel Suevey", at $550 annually; this being a survey of
salaries, fringe benefits, and personnel policies of municipalities in the
metropolitan area.'
amount of staff time and effort now used to obtain minimum data, and provide
greater detail from more municipalities than is available under present methods.
Some discussion was had, and fixe moved that proposal be rejected.
seconded by Tupa and carried,
Proponents state such service would eliminate a sizable
Motion
MANAGER HYDE AUTHORIZED TO PARTICIPATE IN SEMI'NAR OF MUNICIPAL-SCHOOL RELATIONSHIPS
AT UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS,. MAY 14 TO 16.
to participate in seminar at the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, May 14
Mr. Hyde told Council he has been invited
to 16, on "Municipal-School Relationships",
authorized to participate in seminar, and that transportation, room and board
expenses be allowed therefor,
Consensus was that Mr, Hyde be
VILLAGE HALL IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED: ESTIMATED COST, '$2,200: A'DDITIONAL REPORT
ASKED ON LABORATORY FOR SANITARIAN,
recommendation for improvements to the Village-plastering walls and ceiling
in the basement area previously occupied by the Sanitarian and Park Department
storage; plastering walls of back Police Department office; &ile floor, and
extend wood and screen partition in old Park department storage-Sanitarian area;
tile ceiling of back Police office; plaster all unfinished wall areas in basement,
to include Park office, hallway and lunchroom, and tile lunchroom floor-
which, he told Council, should cost some $2,200.
Henskey has moved his office upstairs, but that his laboratory will have to be
located , now, in the new Village Garage, and that minimum laboratory equipment
in the Village Garage would come to an additional $2,200 or thereabouts,
Hyde added that some interest has been evidenced by other communities in purchasing
some laboratory equipment for joint usage.
Council, and MacMillan moved that the proposed Village Hall Improvements be
authorized and that Manager Hyde come back with additional information relative
to laboratory equipment for Mr, Hensley.
Manager Hyde presented to Council a 23 XI 0 .ell L2 u
He added that Sanitarian
Mr.
Some little discussion was had by
I4otion seconded by Tupa and carried.
CLAIMS PAID. Tupa's motion, for payment of Claim No. 251471,;From General Fund to
Texaco, Inc. for Gasoline, amount $1,384.09, and for payment of the following
Claims as per Pre-List dated March 16:
Fund, $2,025.00; Park, Park Const. E Golf Course Fund, $30,662.37; Waterworks
Fund, $11,704.69; Liquor Fund, $44,088.72; Sewer Rental Fund, $9.68; Improvement
Funds, $1,588.60; and Poor and PiR Funds, $103,20--TOTAL, $128,718.38, was seconded
by Rixe and carried.
General Fund, $38,536.12; Construction
TREASURER'S REPORT AS AT JANUARY 31, 1964, Was submitted, reviewed, and ordered
placed on file,
FiRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK'S REQUEST TO REDUCE COLLATERAL TO $200,000 HONORED.
Clerk reported request of First Edina National Bank for release of U.S.A.
Treasury 4-3/4% Series A. Note due May 15, 1964, thusoeducing pledged collateral
to $200,000.
$200,000 on deposit with the bank in the near future, and recommended release
of $500,000 collateral,
National Bank be reduced by $500,000, was seconded by Tupa and carried,
Meeting's agenda's having been covered, Rixe moved for a'djournmentJ Motion
seconded by VanValkenburg and carried.
Mr. Dalen reported he believes the Village 'will not have more than
Rixe's motion, that collateral p1edged by First Edina
to Monday, March 30, at 7:OO P.M.
Adjournment at ll:45 P,M.
Village Clerk
.-
.I -