Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19650712_regulari 7/12/65 MINUTES OF THE REGYLAR MEETING OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL, HELD MONDAY , JULY 12, 1965, - EDINA VILLAGE HALL AT 7:OO P.M. Answering Rollcall were Members MacMillan , Rixe , Tupa , VanValke&urg and Bredesen . PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Clerk presented Affidavit of Publication in the Edina-Morningside Courier on July 1 and 8, 1965, and Affidavit of Mailing on July 1, 1965. to due notice given, Public Hearings were conducted on the following proposed improvements, and action taken by Council as hereinafter recorded: Affidavits were approvedas to fo& and ordered placed on file. Pursuant . A. &CONSTRUCTION OF LATERAL SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: B. C. D. E. F. G. H. Creek View Lane from Limerick Lane to cul-deysac. Estimate of Cost was given at $10,033.23 to be assessed against 14 Lots at $716.66 per assessable lot. comment or discussion was heard on this proposal. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes . ) CONSTRUCTION OF LATERAL NATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING : Creek View Lane from Limerick Lane to Brook Drive. at $9,650.96, to be assessed against 14 Lots at $689.35 per assessable lot. comment or discussion was heard on this proposal. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutesr) On an easement line between Lots 8 and 9, Block 1, Otto's 3rd Addition from Nine Mile Creek to Creek View Lane. assessed against 14 Lots at $706.70 per assessable lot. discussion was heard on this proposal. lager in Minutesr ) Creek View Lane from Limerick Lane to cul-de-sac. $5,280.26 to be assessed against 14 assessable lots at an estimated cost of $377.16 per lot. Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes. ) CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: West 69th Street from west line of Lot 1, Block 2, Southdale Plaza to York Avenue. York Avenue from West 69th Street to 1730 feet north. at $37,125.34 to be assessed against 9 Lots at an estimated cost per connection of $4,125.04. Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes . ) CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOUNG: West 69th Street from east line of Outlot 2, Sohthdale Plaza to York Avenue. West 69t h Street to West 66th Street and Xerxes Avenue. Estimate of Cost was given at $35,855.12 to be assessed against 9 Lots at an estimated cost per connection of $3,983.90. No comment or discussion was heard on this proposal. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in. Minutes,) CONSTRUCTION OF PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING: t7oodcrest Drive from Park Place to the south lot line of Lot 4, Block 3, Shady Pines Addition. 1,267.9 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $6.06 per assessable foot. Manager Hyde stated that a petition had been received signed by four property owners which favored the improvement and another petition had been received, signed by nine property owners, which opposed the'improvement. 5425 Woodcrest Drive, stated that Glen R. Dornfeld had signed both petitions, but that he was withdrawing his name from the petition favoring the curb and gutter. Mr. Roberts also stated that he liked the street as it now exists. to abandon the Improvement was seconded by Rixe and unanimously carried. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Part A - On an easement line along the extension of Walnut Drive from north line of Walnut Ridge First Addition to 155 feet north; thence west parallel to and 140 feet south of the easthest 1/4 line of Sec. 31, T. 117, R. 21 a distance of 843 feet and'there terminating. east/west 1/11 line of Sec. 31, T. 117, R. 21 from a point 990 feet west of the north/south L/4 line of said Section to a point 1325 feet west of said north/south 1/4 line; thence northwesterly at a deflection angle to the right 34O 39' 30" a distance of 230 feet; thence at a deflection angle to the left of 90' 00' a distance of 120 feet and there terminating. Estimate of Cost for Part A is $9,743.37 to be asse'ssed against 15 assessable connections at an estimated cost of $649.56 per connection. Estimate of Cost for Part B is $14,392.62 to be assessed against 4 assessable connections at an estimated cost per assessable connection of $3,598.16. Part A includes all of the Sime property running from Nine Mile Creek to the Sime west line. property line of Lot A. stated that they are opposed to water being run through their property at the present time since they have no need for it now and may never need it. that Fabri-Tek should pay the cost of the water now and'that his father would sign a contract guaranteeing to pay Fabri-Tek for his share in the event it is needed. Mr. Sime stated that he felt he was being ttblackmailed't by the Village because he would have to deed 100' along the creek to the Village in order to plat his property. No . Estimate of Cost was given No CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Estimate of Cost was given at $9,893.87 to be No comment or (See Resolution Ordering Improvemen't: CONSTRUCTION OF GRAVELING IN THE FO~LONENG: Estimate of Cost was given at . No comment or discussion was heard on this proposal. (See Estimate of Cost was given . No comment or discussion was heard on this proposal. (See I York Avenue fmm Estimate of Cost was given at $7,683.93 to be assessed against Mr. Merrill D. Roberts, Tupa's motion Part B - On an easement line 140 feet south of and parallel to the I Part B includes Fabri-Tek property from their east line to the William Sime, representing his father, Nilliam J. Sime, He felt 7/12/65 He further stated that a number of lots would be lost if they could not plat up to the creek, and that they plan to.fight'if the'katermain Is approved by Council. Bredesen stated that the Village has an obligation to developed property to install necessary improvements at the &owest possible cost and that it is not unusual to go across vacant,property in order to accomplish this. VanValkenburg then offered the folLowing Resolution and moved its adoption: Mayor No further discussion was offered. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS NOS. 202 9 203, 204 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. 239 & 240 . STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. 96 GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C91 BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council, Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council Jheretofore caused notices of hearings to be duly published on the following proposed improvements: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES in Creek View Lane from Limerick 2. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES in Creek View Lane from Limerick 3. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT AND APPURTENANCES on an easement line Lane to cul-de-sac. . Lane to cul-de-sac. between Lots 8 and 9, Block 1, Otto's 3rd Addition from Nine Mile Creek to Creek View Lane. 4. CONSTRUCTION OF GRAVELING in Creek View Lane from Limerick Lane to cul-de-sac. 5. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT AND APPURTENANCES in West 69th Street from west line of Lot 1, Block 2; Southdale Plaza to York Avenue; in York Avenue from West 69th Street to'l730 feet north. 6. CONSTRUCTION OF WATEWAIN IMPROVEENT AND APPURTENANCES in West 69th Street from east line of Outlot 2, Southdale Plaza to York Avenue; York Avenue from West 69th Street to West 66th Street and Xerxes Avenue, CONSTRUCTION OF WATERhAIN IMPROVEMENT AND APPURTENANCES on an easement line along the extension of Walnut Dkive from the north line of Walnut Ridge First Addition to 155 feet north; thence west parallel to and 140 feet south of the east-west 1/4 line of Sec. 31, T. 117, R. 21 a distance of 843 feet and there terminating (Part A); on an easement line 140 feet south of and parallel to the east-west 1/4 line of Sec. 31, T. 117, R1 21 from a point 990 feet west of the north-south 1/4 line of said Section to. a point 3325 feet west of said north-south 1/4 line; . thence northwesterly at a deflection angle to the right 340039' 30" a distance of 230 feet; thence at a deflection angle to the left of 90 00' a.rdistance of 120 feet and there terminating (Part B). 7. At the hearings held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of,the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to procee'd with the construction of said improvements, and said improvements are hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: No, 1 above SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEtdENT NO. 239 No. 2 above WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. 202 No. 3 above STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. 96 No. 4 above GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO, C91 No. 5 above . SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO'. 240 No. 6 above WATERMAIN IMPROVBMENT NO 1 203 No. 7 above WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. 204 and 'areas to be specially assessed therefore shall be as follows: For Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 239 - Lots 1 thru 10 inclusive, and Lots 12 thru 15 inclusive, all in Block 1, Otto's 3rd Addition. For Watemain Improvement No. 202 - Lots 1 thru 30 inclusive, and Lots 12 thru 15 inclusive, all in Block 1, Otto's 3rd Addition. For Stom Sewer,Improvement No, 96 - Lots 1 thru 10 inclusive, and Lots 12 thru 15 inclusive, all in Block 1, Otto's 3rd Addition. For graveling Improvement No. C91 - Lots 1 thru LO -inclusive, and Lots 12 thru 15 inclusive, all in Block I, Otto's 3rd Addition. ?or Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 240 - Outlot 3, Southdale Plaza, and Tract F, R*L.S. #629, For Watermain Improvement No. 204 - Parcels #846 and #851, Sec. 31, T. 117, R. 21 and Tracts A, D and E, R.L.S. #l145. For Watemain Improvement No. 203 - Outlot 3, Southdale Plaza, and Tract F, R.L.S. #629. Resolution for adoption of the improvements 1-40 i i 7/12/65 CONDEMNATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AUTHORIZED FOR WATERMAIN NO. 204. In view of Mr. Sime's statement that his father plans on fighting Watermain Improvement No, 204, and in, the event that efforts to secure easements are unsuccessful, VanValkenburg offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. 204 WHEREAS, Mr. William Sime has informed Council of his intention of fighting AND WHEREAS easements may not be granted to the Village of Edina by Mr. Sime; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, TJatermain Improvement No. 204; Hennepin County, Minnesota that condemnation right-of-way easements in the event that effo Mr. Sime are unsuccessful. VanValkenburg's motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by MacMillan and on Rollcall dl voted aye and the Resolution was unanimously adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 261-113 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING. Edina-Morningside Courier on June 10 and 17, 1965, and of Posting on ViUage Bulletin Boards on June 23, 1965, were presented by Clerk, form and placed on file. Mr. Fredlund stated that this Ordinance basically increased the lot size to make double bungalow lots more compatible with single family residence lots and increase parking requirements to two required spaces per unit and that they. be enclosed within a garage. first reading: Affidavits of Publishing in the Affidavits were approved as to MacMillan then offered the following Ordinance for ORDINANCE NO. 261-113 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDIN~CE OF' EDINA BY CHANGING THE LOT AREA REQUIREMENTS IN THE R-2 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph 3 of Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of the Village, as amended, is hereby further amended by changing the basic required lot area for the R-2 residential district set forth in subparagraph (a) to read as follows: Min. Lot Area Per Min, Total Lot Di-st rict Dwelling Unit Area R-2 9,000 square feet 1-1/2 times the average platted. lot size within 500 fee?, but in no case less th*& :L8,000 square feet Sec. 2. The first sentence of paragraph 7 of Section 4 of said ordinance is hereby amende'd to read as follows: at least one completely enclosed parking space and one-half enclosed or exposed parking space for each dwelling unit in the multiple residence dwelling, except that in the R-2 District there shall be provided two completely enclosed parking spaces "There shall be provided on the site occupied by the multiple residence dwelling . ORDINANCE NO. 261-114 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING. ' Edina-Morningside Courier on June 10 and 17, 1965, and of Posting on Village Bulletin- Boards on June 23, 1965, were presented by ClGrk, form-and placed on file. Mr. Fredlund stated that this Ordinance is an addition . , to the Commercial Ordinance which specifies certain design standards in construction for a11 buildings within the Commercial District which would put them in conformance with the Planned Industrial District requirements , following Ordinance for first reading: Affidavits of Publishing in the' Affidavits were approved as to VanValkenburg then offered the 7/12/65 ORDINANCE NO. 261-114 All ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF EDINA BY ADDING BUILDING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS FOR THE COMMERCIAL AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 3. The Zoning Ordinance (No. 261) of the Village, hereby further amended by adding to Section 11 (Commercial District) following paragraph : as amended, is thereof the "11, Building Design and Construction. In addition to other restrictions of this ordinance and any other ordinance of the Village, any building or structure within the Commercial District shall meet the following standards: combination of the following: (1) Face brick. (2) Natural stone. (3) (4) (a) All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be any single one or Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture. Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials be any of those named above, glass, prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron), or plastic. Other materials as may be recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the.Village .Council1 . All subsequent additions and outbuildingsJ constructed after, *he erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of the same materials as the original construc- tion and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural design &nd general appearance . (b) must be recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the Village Councilrtt Secr 2. (Light Industrial District) thereof the following paragraph: this ordinance and any other ordinance of the Village, any building or structupe within the Light Industrial District shall meet the following standards; combination of the following: (1) Face brick. (2) Natural stone. (3) (4) (5) Any other exterior wall finishes, or any changes in architectural design Said ordinance is hereby further amended by adding to Section 7 tt4. Building Design and Constructionr In addition to other restrictions of (a) All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be any single one or Specially designed precast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel treated with an applied decorative material or texture. materials be any of those named above, glass, prefinished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron), or plastic, Other materials as may be recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the Village Council. All subsequent additions and outbuildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of the same materials as the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming with the original architectural design and general appearance. design must be recommended by the Planning Commission and approved by the Village Council . " and publication, ATTEST : (5) . (b) Any other exterior wall finishes, or any changes in architectural Sec. 3, This ordinance shall be in er its passage ORDINANCE NO. 261-115 PRESENTED FOR FIRST READING. No. 261-115.for first readingr Affidavits of Publication in the Edina-Morningside Mr, Fredlund presented Ordinance Courier on June 10 and 17, 1965, and of Posting on Village Bulletin Boards on June 23, 1965, were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and placed on file. Mr. Fredlund explained that this Ordinance establishes conformance of the Office Building District with the major district in regards to setbacks, parking and loading and screening. VanValkenburg then offered the following Ordinance for first reading: ORDINANCE NO. 261-115 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE Nor 261 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA AS TO USES AND RESTRICTIONS ON USES IN THE . OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: District) of the Zoning Ordinance (No. 261) of the Village, as amended, are hereby amended to read as folLows: Section 1. Subparagcaphs (d), (e) and (f) of Section LO (Office Building 7/12 /6 5 It( d) Building Setbacks , (1) Front Yard,, A minimum front yard setback of 35 feet shall be required, a front yard faces a residential district across a street, the setback from that street sh-dl be not less than 50 feet, (25 feet if abutting on a public street) or the maximum height of the building on that particular side, whichever shall be greater, shall be required. Planned Commercial District or a Planned Industrial District, the front yard, side yard and interior street side setback requirements preseribed for the major planned district shall take precedence over the requirements stated in this section, provided for each 250 square feet of gross floor area within the building, shall be provided on the building lot or within 200 feet thereof; provided, such parking space is not separated from the building site by a public street right-of-way. uses, additional parking spaces shall be provided at the rate. of eight spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area devoted to accessory uses. in a convenient and orderly fashion, with a hard, all-weather, durable, dust-free surfacing material and shall be properly drained. have a minimum width of 8-1/2 feet and a length of 19 feet exclusive of aisles and maneuvering space, 18 feet for 60 degree parking and 24 feet for 90 degree parking, one part of a parking lot to another shall be capable of doing so without using a public street. or fence of acceptable design, or by a compact hedge along all sides which adjoin or are directly across the street from property in a residential zonea or hedge shall be not less than 4 feet high and not more than 6 feet high and shall be maintained in good condition. purposes. arranged as to deflect the light away from adjacent properties in residential use. it be located closer than ten feet to a side or rear lot line, nor. closer than ten feet to any building. facility for an office building having a gross floor area of 20,000 to 100,000 square feet and one additional facility for each 100,000 square feet or major fraction thereof over the original100,OOO square feet, of loading areas shall be subject to the same restrictions applicable to offestreet parking areas. Commercial District or a Planned Industrial District, the location, design and screening of loading areas prescribed for the major planned district shall take precedence over the requirements stated in t and publication. ATTEST: (2) Side and. Rear Yards. A minimum side and rear yard setback of 20 feet (3) When the Office Building District is an integral part of either a "(e) Off-street Parking. A minimum of one off-street parking space shall be Parking When an office building is of such size or capacity as to provide accessory Off-street parking areas shall be so designed that vehicles can be parked Parking areas shall be surfaced and maintained Each parking space shall be clearly outlined or otherwise marked and shall Clear aisle widths shall be at least 12 feet for 45 degree parking, Traffic moving from All open off-street parking areas shall be effectively screened by a wall Such wall, fence The wall or fence shall not be used for advertising All lighting used to illuminate off-street parking areas shall be so No parking area shall occupy any required front yard setback norrshall I "(f) Off-street Loading, There shall be provided at least one off-street loading The location, design and screening Hhen the office district is an integral part of either a Planned I Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be Village Clerk TYLER AVENUE STREET VACATION CONTINUED TO AUGUST 2, Mr. Hyde explained that this street vacation had been continued from June 21, and that Mr. Geron Carlson was supposed to have come into the Village Hall and check on his special assessments, Hrs. Beauford Carlson, 6600 Belmore Lane, stated that they had expected someone from the Village to come out and look over the situation, in view of the fact that Mr, Geron Carlson desires abatement of his special assessments, he should oppose the street vacation, Carlson to ask Mr. Geron Carlson to make an appointment to see Mr. Hyde and that the Village would,attempt to determine whether or not the lots are usable. VanValkenburg's motion to continue the hearing until August 2 was seconded by Tupa and uqanimously carried. OILING PETITION RECEIVED, and I?, 57th Street was accepted-and referred to the Engineering Department for programming by motion of MacMillan, seconded by Tupa and carried. Mayor Bredesen stated that Mayor.Bredesen told Mrs. Beauford I Oiling petition for Dale Avenue between W. 56th Street REPLAT-0-F BLOCK 2 CAROLAlJE ADDITION GIVEN PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. Mr. Fredlund explained that W. R. Blix, the owner of Block 2, Carolane Addition, wants to subdivide it from two lots to four lots. installation of sewer and water in Lee Valley Circler pollution tests in Prospect Hills , which is adjacent to Carolane Addition, has over 40% pollution. tion of sewer and water, was seconded by Tupa. un~imously carried. Planning Commission has recommended.approva1 pending Mr. Hensley has reported that ' VanValkenburg's motion approving preliminary plat subject to installa- All voted aye and the motion was 7/12 /6 5 .COOPER ADDITION GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL. Mr. Fredlund reported that the final plat for Cooper Addition conforms in a11 respects to the preliminary plat as submitted. Sewer and water is going to be installed, and an easement needs to be drawn. VanValkenburg's motion approving final plat of Cooper Addition of sewer and water and the granting of the easement was seconded by Tupa and unanimously carried, . sub&ect to installation SAVORY ADDITION FINAL PLAT APPROVED. Mr. Fredlund informed Council that the plat conforms in all respects to the preliminary Planning Commission recommended approval. VanValkenburg's motion for approval was seconded by Tupa and unanimously carried. LOT 5., BLOCK 12, NORMANDALE ADDITION LOT DIVISION APPROVED. Mr. Fredlund stated that Planning Commission recommended approval of request of Morris Rasmussen for the lot divisi,on of Lot 5, Block 12, Normandale Addition, in conformance with other properties in the arear and water, VanValkenburg moved acceptance of the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. On condition that this property has been assessed for sewer Motion was seconded by Tupa and unanimously carriedr GABBE,RTS WAREHOUSE PLANS NOT APPROVED. had denied approval of the Gabbert's Warehouse located on Cahill Road, because of the fact that plantings are undersized and scarce. Mr, Fredlund reported that Planning Commission STREET. NAME CH-N-GES HEARING DATE SET. street name changes: between Dundee Road and Highway #169 to be changed to "Dundee Road.'' motion setting hearing date was seconded by Tupa and unanimously carried. Hearing date of August 2 was set for the followhg Boundary Boulevard to bezchanged to Viking Drive;" W. 56th Street VanValkenburg's REAL ESTATE OFFICE AT SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CENTER REFERRED BACK TO PLANNING COMlyISSIONr In reference to Mr. William Crear's request for a real estate office at the Southdale Medical Center, Mr, Hyde stated that Planning Commission is contemplating an ordinance amendment which would change the Medical District Zoning to Office Building Zoning. VanValkenburg's motion that Mr. Crear's request be referred back to Planning Commission was seconded by Rixe and unanimously carried. ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS AUTHORIZED FOR SANITARY SEWER REPAIR FQR WINDSOR AVENUE. Mr. Hyde asked permission to advertise for bids for repair of the Sanitary Sewer Tunnel1 under the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad Tracks at Windsor Avenue, which project will not be assessed. advertisement of bids was seconded by Rixe and unanimously carried. VanValkenburg's motion authorizing 1966 BUDGET-CALENDAR TO BE ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 7. of the 1966 Budget Hearing be set for September 7 was accepted by Council. Mr. Hyde's request that the date Mr. Hyde stated that any-suggestions or recommendations that the Council might have would be appreciated. LAKE. CONFERENCE HOCKEY AGREEMENT EXECUTION AUTHORIZED. Resolution authorizing execution of the Lake Conference Hockey Agreement. Manager Hyde presented a VanValkenburg then offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption. . ~ ~ESOLUTL ON WHEREAS. on the basis of the written and oral assurances of the various independent schooi districts comprising the Lake Conference Association, that each of them would enter into the Agreement, dated as of June 15, 1965, with the Village of Edina, the Council authorized the award of contracts for the construction of an indoor ice arena in Braemar Park notwithstanding that it appears that the cost therefor will be from $75,000 to $100,000 in excess of the estimated cost; and June 15, 1965, consisting of eight typewritten pages, between each of the nine independent school districts comprising the Lake Conference Association and the Village, a copy of which Agreement was presented to, read at and ordered filed with the minutes of this meeting, appears reasonable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that upon the receipt of signed agreements from each of the nine independent school districts comprising the Lake Conference Association, the Mayor and Village Manager of the Village of Edina, on behalf of and in the name of the Village, execute and deliver to each of said independent school districts a copy of said Agreement; and employees of this Village be, and they hereby are, authorized and directed to do all things necessary or incidental to carry out the terms and conditions of said Agreement; and the Village Manager be directed to request each of the independent school districts to consent to the amendment of paragraph 8 of said Agreement to provide for a renewal term of five years rather than two years and to report to the Council with respect to the response to such request. WHEREAS, in the judgment of the Council the said Agreement dated as of . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village Manager and other officers and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that in view of the increased cost of said facility, Motion for adoption of the foregoing Rollcall there were five ayes and no adopted. . ATTEST : 7/12/65 WAj2REN AVENUE ACCESS TO F.1. 62ND STREET TO BE INVESTIGATED. the manner in which Warren Avenue could be approached at Highway 62 during construction. Mr. Hyde stated that he would check with Hennepin County and report on his findings. MacMillan questioned I CLAIMS PAID. dated July 12, 1965, was seconded by MacMillan and carried: Construction Fund, $2,665.94; Park, Park Construction, Golf Course, Swimming Pool, $21,704.20; Water Fund, $2,557.98; Liquor Fund, $43,297.17; Sewer Rental, Fund, $140.60; P.I.R. and Poor Funds, $4,104.34; Total, $88,683.38. Tupa's motion for payment of the following Claims as per Pre-List General Fund, $14,211.15; There being no further business to come before the meeting, Rixe moved for adjournment. Motion seconded by VanValkenburg and carried. Adjournment at 8:05 P.14. WdU 0, Village Clerk MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE EDINA BOARD OF REVIEW, HELD WEDNESDAY, JULY 14, 1965, AT 5:OO P.M., AT THE * , . EDINA VILLAGE HALL Council Members Rixe, Tupa and VanValkenburg acted as the Board of Review, with VanValkenburg presiding. Village Assessor, Donald Kearns , submitted the Record of Valuations for the Year 1965. Wayne Johnson, was also present, The meeting was convened promptly at 5:OO P.M. , pursuant to "Notice of Board of Review' Meeting" published in Edina-Morningside Courier on June 24 and July 1, 1965, and posted on Village Bulletin Boards on June 14, 1965. * I Hennepin County Supervisor of Assessments, Mr. Kearns presented present property valuations and stated that Real Estate values were assessed at $35,230,000 and Personal Property values were assessed at $2,425,000 with a total assessed valuation of $37,655,000, showing an increase of approximately $1,720,000. reported by Mr. Kearns. A drop in Utilities of approximately $100,000 was The Council reviewed the Personal Property Assessment Records . Rixe's motion that Valuations Village Assessor was seconded for the Year 1965 be approved as presented by the by Tupa and carried. Adjournment at 5:30 P.M.