Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19670501_regular72, \ 5/1/67 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MONDAY, MAY 1, 1967 EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON Members answering Rollcall were Trustee Courtney, Johnson, MacMillan, VanValkenburg and Mayor Bredesen. MINUTES ofthe Regular Meeting of April 17,.1967, were approved as submitted by motion of Trustee MacMillan, seconded by Trustee VanValkenburg and carried. .t PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON INDIAN HILLS IMPROVEMENTS. ok Publication in the Edina Courier on March 9 and March 16 and Mailing on March 8, 1967, had been ordered placed on file at the meeting of April 3, 1967, at which meeting the hearings on the following improvements were continued to this date: A. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Clerk advised that Affidavits Valley View Road from existing munk sewer near Braemar Park to Gleason Road Dakota Trail Cheyenne Trail Cheyenne Circle Blackfoot Pass Indian Hills.Pass Cherokee Trail from Indian Hills Pass to Navaho Trail Indian Hills Road from existing trunk sewer 300' west of Arrowhead Pass to Cherokee Trail Arrowhead Pass Indian Hills Ci'rcle Mohawk Trail Iroquois Circle from Mohawk Trail to 400' South Nark Terrace Drive from VaXley View Roadlto Mark Thrace Circle ' B. CONSTRUCTION OF LATERAL WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Valley View Road from Gleason Road to proposed Mark Terrace Drive 1000' south Dakota Trail Cheyenne Trail Cheyenne Circle Blackfoot Pass Indian Hills Road from 300' West of Arrowhead Pass to Indian Hills Pass Indian Hill3 Road from Navaho Trail to Cherokee Trail Arrowhead Pass Indian Hills Circle' Mohawk Trail Iroquois Circle from Mohawk Trail to 150' South * Shawnee Circle Mark Terrace Drive from Valley View Road to Mark Terrace Circle Indian Hills Road, west line Lot 3, Block, 1, McCauley Heights - Halla Replat' Arrowhead Pass, Indian Hills Road to Cul-de-sac Indian Hills Circle, Indian Hills Road to Cul-de-sac tvlohawk Trail from Indian Hills Road to Iroquois Circle Iroquois Circle from south line of Indian Hills Addition to Iroquois Trail Iroquois Trail from Iroquois Circle to West Trail Dakota Trail from Indian Hills Road to Valley View Road Cheyenne Trail from Indian Hills Road to Valley View Road Cheyenne Circle from Cheyenne Trail to Cul-de-sac Blackfoot Pass from Indian Hills Road to Cheyenne Trail Valley View Road from Gleason Road to 370' south of the most northerly 'corner * of Outlot 2, Muir Woods' Mark Terrace Drive from Valley View Road to Mark Terrace Drive in Braemar Hills Addition Shawnee Circle from Dakota Trail to cul-de-sac Indian Hills Pass from Indian Hills'Road to Gleason Road Cherokee Trail from Indian Hills Pass to Navaho Trail .< *I Shawnee Circle ** I I - of Dakota Trail .. C. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOWING: to Cherokee Trail 1 1 I Hearings on Improvements A, B and C listed above were conducted concurrently. presented tabulation of the results of 75% of the questionnaires which had been sent to property owners as follows: Sanitary Sewer: Mr. Hyde 46 believe sanitary sewer should be installed. 64 believe sanitary sewer should not be installed. If sanitary sewer is authorized: 60 believe the 12 houses on Mark Terrace should be deleted from 39 believe the 12 houses on Mark Terrace should not be deleted the project. from the project. 5/1/67 13 t 39 believe the -houses served by the lift stations should be 49 believe the houses served by the lift stations should not be assigned total cost of these stations. assigned total cost of these stations. Watermain : If the sanitary sewer is authorized: 53 believe the waterhain should be installed at the same time. ' 42 believe that watermain should be'deleted from the project. Permanent Street Surf acinE If either sanitary sewer or watermain is authorized: 15 believe the streets should be surfaced and curb and gutter installed. 31 believe streets should be surfaced without concrete curb and gutter. 53 believe that no permanent street surfacing should be installed. If permanent street surfacing is authorized: 40 prefer assessment on a front foot basis. 44 prefer the per homesite basis of assessment. 10 prefer an lladjustedtt front foot assessment basis . 13 prefer a 10 year assessment period. 81 prefer a 20 year assessment period. Assessment Term: Mayor Bredesen pointed out that Mark Terrace residents had requested that their property be deleted from the Indian Hills project because of the fact that they have no need for these improvements at present and already have a permanently surfaced street with concrete curb and gutter. Mr. Hyde advised that a letter had been received from Mr. James Overhold asking that Mrs. Ralph Overholt's residence be assessed for only one lot rather than 7 as proposed. Mr, Hyde explained that the Overholt-property consists of approximately 7 acres and that the planning is based on a preliminary plat filed by the late Ralph Overholt some time ago. It was also pointed out that Shawnee Circle is still a private road and would have to be acquired as a public street or an easement obtained prior to the installation of sewer and water in it. Mr._J-ack- Haverly also reguesteQdeleJtipn- of his" seven Lots in. Cherokee Hills. Dakota Trail; Robert Brockway, 6927 Valley View Road; Richard Einck, 6605 Blackfoot Pass; Thomas Boulay, 6000 Blackfoot Pass and Mrs. William Turner, 6608 Mohawk Trail a11 advised that if one area is deleted from the improvement, other areas should have the same consideration. It was pointed out that Mark Terrace properties could tie into the Braemar Hills system for approximately $1,700 less than'it will cost to connect with the system now under consideration. made, the remaining project will become so expensive that it will not be possible to install it. View Road; E. A, Messenger, 6820. Valley View Road; Marvin Fergestad, 6625 Mohawk Trail; and Mrs. J. R. Hallberg all advised that they oppose the proposed improvements, Mr. Harry Murphy, 6508 Indian Hills Road, asked what legal rights he would have to fight the proposed improvements which he suggested were made at the Mr. Whitlock advised that once the assessment has been levied, property owners have 20 days in which to appeal the assessment. advise the Council that it can order an improvement over the objections of the majority of the property owners if the Council deems it necessary and appropriate. Mayor Bredesen pointed out that Council receives no credit or satisfaction in ordering an improvement and does so only when it is considered to be a matter of public health and safety for the community and not because of a llwhim.*l Mr. Henry Feikema, attorney representing 90 property owners, Mr. James Hensley, Village Sanitarian, advised that two wells are contaminated and that traces of detergent found in Indian Head Lake could have only gotten in the lake through septic tank facilities. Tracer dye was also flushed down toilet facilities and this dye was later picked up in the lake. at the present time. he canoes on Indian Head Lake and agrees with Mr, Hensley that contamination is evident around the perimeter of the lake. will pollute a lake. Mayor Bredesen replied that this is a differentytfrpe of pollution and advised that three or four years ago a death was attributable to contaminated water and he would not want to be responsible for any such occurence caused by water in this area. Trail, both spoke in favor of installing the improvements as proposed at this time. Mr. Sidney Rebers who owns property on Dakota Trail, read a letter from Swanson Excava- ting Company which stated how the rise in cost of labor, equipment and material would effect the future cost of construction of this type. Mr. Robert Hipps, 6604 Dakota Trail, advised that he would favor being assessed only for the cost of the gravity " sanitary sewer. Mrssrs. George Babcock, Alfred Sedgwick and Robert Meader, all of Mark Terrace Drive, urged that Mark Terrace Drive be eliminated from this project. Mr. Ward Bates, 6416 Indian Hills Road, was advised that no special consideration had been given to a request for deletion of the section of road in the area of Indian Hills Road and Cheyenne Trail. health and safety of the community, sanitary sewer is necessary and installation of water is desirable and almost necessary, but that he does not feel that curb and gutter is a necessary part of the street improvements. asked if the streets would be in the same condition as they now,are after they have been torn up for the sewer and water. Messrs . Edward Delaney , 6808 Mayor Bredesen advised that if other deletions are Messrs. Norman Hilleran, 6312 Indian Hills Road; James Bloom 6825 Valley of the Council. He further advised Mr. Murphy that he would In reply to a question from Mr. Hensley pointed out that the lake is not recommended for recreational uses Mr. H. C. Johnson, owner of property on Dakota Trail, advised that Mr. Fergestad pointed out that natural storm drainage Mr. Jerome Peterson, 6705 Cheyenne Trail, and Mrs. G. R. Werness, 6800 Dakota Mayor Bredesen advised that he feels that in the interest of Mr. A1 Morgan, 6900 Valley View Road, He was advised by Mr. Hite that present street '- 74 ) 5/1/67 surfacing is the result of many years of oiling and undisturbed base and that it is impossible to recreate this situation without a substantial cost. Mr. Hite further pointed out that 8 inches'of gravel and one or two coats of oil are included in the sewer and water estimate and that this will make an excellent base for a future asphalt surface in the event that the proposed street improvements are not authorized. In reply to a question of Mr. E. S. Sivright, 6600 Dakota Trail; Mrs. Karl Leufvenius, 6404*Indian Hills Road, and Mr. John Kirkland, 6501 Indian Hills Road, Mr. Hite advised that normal assessment period for street surfacing without curb and gutter is five years and a ten year assessment is levied when curb and gutter are installed. In reply to a question as to whether Valley View Road will be widened, Mr. 'Hite explained that it will not be widened until such time as the street improvement is authorized, but that this is a State Aid Road and if State funds are used for its improvement, a width of 36 feet must be maintained and parking will be restricted to one side of the s2reet only. It was also pointed out that widening ofthe street alone will not cause an increase in traffic, but that future development of the area and the fact that Valley View Road will provide the only access to County Road 18 after it has been upgraded will mean that more traffic will pass through this area. A question was raised as to why Council would not favor deleting areas from these improvements when it had approved deletion of a portion of the Blake Road watermain. Trustee Johnson pointed out the following differences: already have sanitary sewer and there was no lake or well pollution involved as in the Indian Hills area; 2) not want water, whereas, a substantial number of property owners in Indian Hills had expressed a desire for sewer and water; 3) in the Blake Road Area. Trustee Johnson also pointed out that at the time of the' Asse-sment Hearing, he would recommend that some eonsideration be given because of the disparity of lot sizes. Mayor Bredesen advised that over the years, Council policy has been established that sewer and water be assessed on a per connection basis because it is felt that these improvements are equal in benefit regardless of lot size. sewer and watermain,'whereupori Trustee VanValkenburg's motion for approval of the sanitary sewer and watermain and storm sewer as presented, with the exception of properties on Mark Terrace, and with the $ecommendation for a twenty year assessment period was seconded by Trustee Johnson and carried, Improvement later in Minutes.) Mayor Bredesen then asked for a show of hands as to how many favor permanent street improvement at this time, with a 20 year assessment period and how many would be interested in street improvement at a later date, with the possibilitxof having a 20 year assessment in view of high assessments which would then be existing for the sanitary sewer and water, Show of hands in'dicated a strong desire on the part of the audience to postpone street improverrienfs until a later 'date. Mayor Bredesen pointed out that this Council can make no dom6itments for any future Council and that no recommendation will be binding. burg then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING SANITARY SENER IMPROVEMENT NO. 25'2 1) Blake Road area properties 83% of the property owners in the area west of Blake Road did Permsnent street had already been installed No further comments were heard relative to the installation of sanitary (See Resolution Ordering Trustee VanVaiken- AND l?ATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. 218 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and maiied to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvements: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Valley View Road Yrom existing trunk sewer near Braemar Park to Gleason Road Dakota Trail Cheyenne Trail Cheyenne Circle Blackfoot Pass Indian Hills Pass Cherokee Trail from Indian Hills' Pass to Navaho Trail Indian Hills Road from existing trunk sewer'300''west of Arrowhead Pass to Cherokee Trail Arrowhead Pass Indian Hills Circle Mohawk Trail Shawnee Circle Mark Terrace Drive from Valley View Road to Mark Terrace Circle CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE NATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Valley View Road from Gleason Road to proposed Mark Terrace Drive 1000' south Cheyenne Trail Cheyenne Circle Blackfoot Pass Indian Hills Road from 300' west of Arrowhead Pass to Indian Hills Pass Indian Hills Road from Navaho Trail to Cherokee Trail Arrowhead Pass Indian Hills Circle Mohawk Trail Iroquois Circle from Mohawk Trail to 150' south " * *.. .I* * Iroquois Circle from Mohawk Trail to 400' south 2 . .- of Dakota Trail 5/1/67 ''. Shawnee Circle Mark Terrace Drive from Valley View Road to Mark Terrace Circle And at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby.determine to proceed with the construction of said improvements as described in the published notices of said hearing except that Mark Terrace Drive from Valley View Road to Mark Terrace Circle shall be deleted from both the sanitary sewer and watermain improvements, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvements; that said improvements are hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows : No. 1 Above SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. 257 No. 2 Above WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. 218 and the area to be specially assessed therefore shall include: For Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 257 - Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 10 and 11, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, and Lots 4 thru 10 incl., Block 2; Lots 1 thru 7 incl., Block 3; Lots 1, 2 and 3, B$ock 4; Lots 2 thru 9 incl., and Lots 12 thru 19 incl., Block 5; Lots 1 thru 6 inc., Block 6; Lots 1 thru 6 incl., Block 7; Lots 1 thru 6 incl., and Lot 13, Block 8; Lot 1, Block 9; Lot 2, Block 10; all in Indian Hills Addition; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Indian Hills, Thompson Replat; Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1; and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2 in Overholt Hills, Sally Addn.; Lots 1 thru 5 incl., Block 1, Overholt Hills, James Addn.; Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 1 thru 4 incl., Block 2, Lot 1 Block 3, and Outlot 3, in Overholt Hills, Georgia Addn.; Lot 2, Block 1, Muir GJoods Addn.; Lot 1, Bloc& 1, Dahlquist Addn.; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Elizabeth Terrace; Parcel 86000 in Sec. 7, T. 116, R. 21; Lot 2, Block 1, f4occasin Valley; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Moccasin Valley Replat; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Pioneer Oaks; Lot; 1, Block 1, Meret Ridge; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Claudia Ridge; Tract A, R.L.S. No. 86; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Indianhead Lake View Addn.; Lots 1 thru 5 incl., Block 1, Indianhead Crest; Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 2, and Lot 1, Block 3, Indianhead Crest; Outlot 1, Cherokee Hills 3rd Addn.; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, McCauley Heights First Addn.;Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Replat of Lot 3,.McCauley Heights First Addn.; Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley Heights, Halla Replat; Part of Lot 13, Part of Lot 16, Lot 35, Lot 37, Lot 39, Lot 40, Part of Lot 41 - Parcel #9816, Part of Lot 41 - Parcel #9975, Auditor's Subdivision No. 196. For Watermain Improvement No. 218 above - Lots 1, 2, 3, 5 and 9, Block 1, Lots 3 thru 10 incl., Block 2, Lots 1 thru 7 incl., Block 3, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 4, Lots 2 thru 9 incl., and Lots 12 thru 19 incl., Block 5, Lots 1 thru 6 incl., Block 6, Lots 3,4 and 6, Block 7, Lots 1 thru 6 incl., and Lot 13, Block 8, Lot 1, Block 9 and ' Lot 2, Block 10, all in Indian Hills Addition;Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Indian Hills, Thompson Replat; Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 1, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, in Overholt Hills, Sally Addn.; Lots 1 thru 5 incl., Block 1, Overholt Hills, James Addn.; Lot 1, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 2, Lot 1, Block 3, and Outlot 3, in Overholt Hills, Georgia Addition.; Lot 2, Block 1, Muir Woods Addn.; Lot 1, Block 1, Dahlquist Addition; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Elizabeth Terrace; Parcel #6000 in Sec. 7, T. 117, R. 21; Lot 2, Block 1, Moccasin Valley; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Moccasin Valley Replat; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Pioneer Oaks; Lot 1, Block 1, Meret Ridge; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Claudia Ridge; Tract A, R.L.S. No. 86; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Indianhead Lake View Addn.; Lots 1 fhp 5 incl,, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 2, Lot 1, Block 3, Indianhead Crest; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, McCauley Heights First Addn.; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Replat of Lot 3, McCauley Heights First Addn.; Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley Heights, Halla Replat; Part of Lot 13, Part of Lot 16, Lot.35, Lot 37, Lot 39, Lot 40, Part of Lot 41 - Parcel #9816 and part of Lot 41, Parcel #9975, Auditor's Subdivision #196. Motion for adoption of the resolution wag there were five ayes and no nays and the ATTEST : Mayor Village Clerk ROBERT E. MOORE GRANTED PLANNED CONME~CIAL c-2 ZONING FOR PROPERTY ON WEST SIDE OF T.H. 100 BETWEEN EPSBERS RESTAURANT AND SOUTH VILLAGE LIMITS. on ADril 21 and of Publication in the Edina Courier on April 20, 1967, were presented Affidavits of Mailing -A by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Nr. Hite presented the request of Mr. Robert E. Moore for rezoning of an 8.40 acre tract of land located vest of T.H. 100 between Embers Restaurant and the south Village boundary from Planned Industrial District to Planned Commercial C-2 District. Report of April 5, 1967, Mr. Hite pointed out that properties south and northeast are zoned for commercial use and those to the west and northwest are zoned €or industry or offices. Mr. Hite advised that the purpose of the rezoning request is to provide parking facilities for the udisson Inn project proposed to be located Referring Fo Zoning 5/1/67 in Bloomington just south of the Edina Village limits. project includes a commercial building of approximately 30,000 square feet containing a bank and retail shops which would be located in Edina. developer, stated that the final plans for this building had not yet been completed but that it would be of good size and quality.. Mr. Hite advised that Planning Commis- sion has recommended approval with the further recommendation that publication of the ordinance be withheld following Second Reading until the Radisson Inn project is well under construction. tax revenue from using this property for parking, Mr. Hite pointed out that while there will be an immediate tax disadvantage, over a twenty year period a facility of this nature should enhance the value and increase the rate of development of all pro- perty in the area between Xerxes Avenue and County Road 18, much of which is presently undeveloped. Trustee VanValkenburg raised the question as to the height of buildings allowed and was told that.(=-2 District can go to four stories while Industrial Dist- rict allows two stories. No further comments were heard, whereupon Trustee Van Valkenburg offered Ordinance No. 261-145 for First Reading as follows, with the stipulation that publication,be withheld following Second Reading until the Radisson Inn prodect is under construction: ORDINANCE NO. 261-145 In addition, the suggested Mr. Antonio Bernardi, In reply to a question of Trustee Johnson relative to loss of I AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONIAG ORUINANCE OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA BY REDESIGNATING FROM PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PC-2 THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Paragraph 7 of Section 9 (Commercial District) of Ordinance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further-amended by adding thereto the following paragraph: "PC-2 CONMERCIAL DISTRICT: Section 1. All that part of Lot 11; Block 8, Edina Interchange Center lying South of the North 135.04 feet of said Lot 11; together with that portion of Lot 9, Block 8, Edina Interchange Center lying Southerly of the WesCerly extension of the South line of the North 135.04 feet of said LoC l1.l1 Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately after its passage and publication. PROSPECT HILLS STREET SURFACING PETITION RECEIVED. Hills residents which requested that streets in the area "be allowed to remain as is with the present type of roads without curb or gutter" was received-and ordered placed on file by motion of Trustee Johnson, seconded by Trustee Courtney and carried. Petition signed by Prospect PETITIONS RECEIVED. The following petitions were received and ordered referred to the Engineering Department for processing by motionnof Trustee Macllillan, seconded by Trustee Courtney and carried: Watermain - Brookside Ave. between T.H. 169-212 to 550' South Watermain - Across flighway 18 from east to west side of County Road 39. Sanitary Sewer - 'In Valley View Road from Sally Lane to Vest side County Rd. 18. Bi;AKE.ROAD TRUNK WATEFWUN OPPOSED BETWEEN T.H. 169-212 AND WATERMAN AVENUE. Hite advised that a petition has been received opposing the construction of the trunk watermain authorized in Blake Road from Waterman Avenue south to T.H. 169-212. Mr. Hite stated that a letter will be sent to property owners in the area explain- ing the necessity for the trunk watermain. letter be sent mas seconded by Trustee Macllillan and car'ried. Mr. Trustee Courtney's motion that this 11. 64TH STREET FRON JOSEPHINE AVE. TO T.H. 100 VACATION HEARING DATE SET for June 5, 1967, by motion of-Trustee Courtney, seconded by Trustee Nacllillan and carried. OILING PETITION for Pine Grove Road from Blake Road to W. Highwood Drive was re- ceived and ordered referred to .the Department of Public 170rks for processing. RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION DISCUSSED FOR T.H. 100 BETPEEN NORTH VILLAGE L3341TS AND CROSSTOYN HIGHWAY. Mr. Hite advised that the 3Xnnes6ta Highway Department design standards have changed for T.H. 100 since the Council approved the layouts for this roadway in 1964 and that, as a result, the right-of-way takings and encroachments were significantly different than had been anticipated. This situation was partic- ularly true between Benton Avenue and Eden Avenue. be necessary to remove eleven homes for highway construction and an additional ten homes would have less than the-desired setback from the roadway. Nr.. Hite pointed out that it is not feasible to move the highway to the east because of-the High School. asked to purchase the properties with less than the desired setbacks. that the design of the highway be changed so that the distance between the main road- way and the frontage roads t70Uld be increased.. Mr. and Mrs. George A. Schmidt, 5040 'Ormandale Court, WS- F- L. Frizzell, 5437 Normandale Road, and Mrs. Edith Ulhan, Under present plans, it will He advisedthat he would recommend that the State Highway Department be He suggested 5/1/67 (97 > 5508 Normandale Road, all questioned the distance proposed to be left between their homes and the service road and expressed indignation that they can get no satis- faction from the State Highway Department as to what they can expect. Mayor Brede- sen stated that the Council will do all that is possible to protect the property owners involved, but stated that if the Council does not approve plans submitted, the State Highway Department can proceed without Council approval. that Council has authority to approve layout plans submitted by the Minnesota High- v7ay Department but that its jurisdiction with respect to right-of-way plans was not clear. Trustee P4acMillan then moved that Council recommend to the State Highway Department that the area between the main highway lanes and the service roads be increased and that the properties in question be purchased. Motion was seconded by Trustee Johnson and unanimously carried. the Village will notify them as soon as any definite information is known. CHEROKEE HILLS 5TH ADDITION GRANTED FINAL PLAT APPROVAL-. Mr. Hite presented Cherokee Hills 5th Addition, final plat of which had been approved on December 7, 1964, but had not been filed. Being advised that a resolution must now be filed with the plat, Trustee Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING CHEROKEE HILLS 5TH ADDITION Mr. Hite pointed out Property owners were advised that BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Cherokee Hills 5th Addition", platted by Jack Haverly and presented at the Meeting of the Village Council of May 1, 1967, be and is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seco call there were five ayes and no nays and Qlution th wagted. ~ ATTEST: Mayo r by Trustee Johnson and on roll- *dz&z &do& Village Clerk REGISTERED LAND SURVEY OF TRACT C, R.L.S. NO. 990 AND TRACT Q, R.L.S. NO. 1050 GRANTED FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Mr. Hit@-presented Registered Land Survey of Tract C, R.L.S. No. 990 and Tract Q, R.L.S. No. 1050 located along W. 77th Street between France Ave. and T.H. 100 for final plat approval. Trustee MacMillan then offered the fol- lowing resolution and moved its adoption: RE;SOLUTION APPROVING TRACT C, R.L.S. NO. 990 AND TRACT Q, R.L.S. NO. 1050 , . REGISTERED LAND SURVEY OF BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Registered Land Survey of Tract C, R.L.S. No. 990 and Tract Q, R.L.S. No. 1050", platted by Gera ing of the Village Council of May 1, 1967, be Motion for ado tion of the resolution was sec voted aye and !he motion was carried. ATTEST : a1 1 dL$-W Village Clerk BOARD OF REVIET? HEARING DATE SET FOR Thursday, July 13, 1967, at 5:OO P.M. by motion of Trustee Courtney, seconded by Trustee Johnson and carried. f. DIVISION OF LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 16, NORMANDALE ADDITION APPROVED. Mr. Hite presented request of Lundco, 'Inc., for division of Lots 3 and 4, Block 16, Normandale Addition, which division conforms with other properties in the area. then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Trustee VanValkenburg RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Lundco, Inc., is the owner of a certain parcel of land in the Village I - of Edina de'scribed as follows: The North 10 feet of the East 1/2 of Lot 4 and the East 1/2 of Lot 3, except the North 40.45 feet thereof, all in Block 16, Normandale Addition; and WHEREAS, said owner has requested approval of the Village of Edina of the conveyance and ownership of the above described land as a separate parcel; and IJHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the purpose of the Sub- division and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tract of land as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance '38 J 5/1/67 3 Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and conveyance, subject, however, to the.provision that no further subdivision be made of the above described tract of land unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was se rollcall there were five ayes and no nays an ATTEST: L4Ld3.h Village Clerk. V HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY LEGISLATION DISCUSSED. Kirchner had asked for advice on what action.he should take regarding the proposed Library Bill, and that the County Library people had submitted a copy of it.. Following some discussion on the matter, it was.informally agreed-that Council should have the opportunity to study the bill further before making any recommendations. Mr, Hyde advised Gouncil that Senator FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STANDARDS FOR STATE AND LOCAL PERSONNEL OPPOSED, that Senator Muskie of Maine has proposed that the Federal Government should Mr. Hyde advised establish standards of operation for all state and local personnel systems as a prerequisite to eligibility for Federal grants, whereupon Trustee VanValkenburg's motion that the .Manager advise Senators McCarthy and Mondale of the Village's opposition to any such action was seconded by Trustee MacMillan and unanimously carried. . HEARING DATES SET FOR IMPROVEMENTS. date be set for May 15, 1967, for the following improvements, Trustee MacMillan offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Upon recommendation of Mr. Hite that hearing RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON .I VARIOUS IMPRQVEMENTS 1. the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in .the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated costs of such improvements, said. report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the Village Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, May 15, 1967, at 7:OO P.M., in the Edina Village Hall, to consider 5n.pUbLic hearing the views. of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The Clerk is, her,eby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successiye weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all effected properties in substantially the following form: ' The. Village Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to . I (Official Publication) VILLAGE OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PERNANENT STREET SURFACING EDINA VILLAGE. COUNCIL will meet at the Edina Village Hall on Monday, May 15, 1967, at 7:OO P.M., to consider the following proposed improvement to be const'ructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes of 1961, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvement is estimated by the Yillage at $2,404.39. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STaET SURFACING IN THE FOLLOWING: Alley between Minnehaha Blvd. and Halifax Avenue from West 52nd Street to the South line of Lot 36, Block 2, South Harriet Park 2nd Addition. The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Permanent Street Surfacing includes Lots 1 thru 7 incl. , Block 2, and Lots 36 thru 42 incl, , Block 2, all in South Harriet Park 2nd Addition. Florence B. Hallberg Village Clerk (Official Publication) VILLAGE OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON STORM SEWER EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL will meet at the Edina Village Hall. on Monday, May 15, 1967, at 7:OO P.M., to consider the following proposed improvement to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes of 1961, Chapter 429. cost of said improvement is estimated by the Village at $29,432.98, The approximate 5/1/67 3 U k3 CONSTRUCTION OF VILLAGE STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: West 56th Street from Brookview Avenue easterly to Minnehaha Creek. The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed storm sewer includes all lots and tracts of land within the following described boundaries: Commencing at the Southwest conner of Lot 11, Block 4, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence Southerly to the Northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 10, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Easterly 66 feet along th’e South line of West 54th Street; thence Southerly 66 feet Easterly of and parallel to the East line of Wooddale Avenue to the South lot line of Lot 18, Block 11, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence Easterly to the Southeast corner of Lot 18, Block 11,.South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Southerly along the rear lot lines of Lots 4 thru 10, Block 11, to the Southwest corner of Lot 10, Block 11, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Easterly along the North line of West 56th Street a distance of 62 feet; thence Southerly to a point on the South line of West 56th Street, said point being 62.31 feet Easterlx of the Northeast corner of Lot 8, ‘Block 2, Colonial Square; thence Southerly to a point on the South line of Lot 8, Block 2, Colonial Square, said point being 67.39 feet Westerly of the Southeast corner of Lot 8, Block 2, Colonial SqGare; thence to a point on the South line of Lot 7, Block 2, Colonial Square, said point being 69.37 feet Southwesterly of the Southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 2, Colonial Square; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Southeasterly line of Lot 6, said point being 74.4 feet Southwesterly of the Southeasterly corner of Lot 6, Block 2, Colonial Square; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Easterly line of Lot 5, Block 2, Colonial Square, said point being 60.72 feet Southwesterly of the Northeast corner of Lot 5, Block 2, Colonial Square; thence Easterly to a point on the‘ East line of Lot 4, Block 2, Colonial Square, said point being 62.5 feet Southerly of the Northeast corner ‘of Lot 4, Bloqk 2, Colonial Square; thence Southerly to a point on the East line of Lot 3, Block 2, Colonial Square, said point being 62.5 feet South of the Northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 2, Colonial Square; thence Northeisterly to a point in Lot 3, Block 1, Edwayds Addition, said point being 55 feet East of the West line and 85 feet North of the South line of said Lot 3, Block 1, Edwards Addition; thence Southeasterly to a point on the East line of Lot 3, Block 1, Edwards Addition, said point being 50 feet South of the Northwest corner of Lot 31, Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn.; thence Southeasterly to a point in Lot 29 , Colonial Grove 2nd Addn. , Edina, Minn. , said point being 50 feet West of the East line &d 20 feet South of the North line of said Lot 29; thence Easterly to a point in Lot 30, Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn., said point being 50 fe‘et East of West line and 20 feet south of the North line of said Lot 30, Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn.; thence Northerly to a point in Lot 36, Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn., said point .being 50 feet East of the West line and 40 feet South of the North line of said Lot 36, Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn.; thence Noptheasterly to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3, Colonial Grove 6th Addition; thence Easterly along ’the South line of said Lot 1, Block 3, and its extension to the East line of Lot 4, Block 1, Colonial Grove 6th Addition; thence Southwesterly to the Southeast corner of said Lot 4, Block 1; thence Southerly to a point on the center &e of Park Place, which point is 30 feet West. of the center line of Woodcrest Drive; thence Easterly to a point on the South line of Lot 3, Block 1, Colonial Grove 6th Addition; which point is 50 feet East of the East line of Woodcrest Drive; thence Northeasterly, parallel to and 50 feet Easterly, of said East line of Woodcrest Drive, to a point 30 feet Southerly from the South line of West 56th Street; thence Northwesterly to the interskction of the center line of Woodcrest and the South line of West 56th Street extended; a distance of 24.10 feet; thence Easterly 60 feet to a point on the Southerly line of Lot 5, Block 2, Shady Pines Addition, said point being 39.7 feet Southeasterly of the Southeasterly line of Dever Drive; thence Northeasterly and Northerly 35 feet Easterly*and parallel to the Easterly line of Dever Drive to the Northerly line of Lot 7, Block 2, Shady Pines Addition; ’thence Northwesterly to a point on the Easterly line of Dever Drive, said point being 40 feet Nobtherly of the Northwest corner of Lot 7, Block 2, Shady Pines Addition; thence Northwesterly along the Northeasterly line of Dever Drive to the Southwest corner of Lot 5, Block 2, Minnehaha Woods, Hennepin County, Minn.; Northwesterly to a point on the East line of Park Place, said point being 25 feet Southerly of the Northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 2, Minnehaha Woods, Hennepin County Minn.; thence Northwesterly to the Northeast corner of Lot 8, Block 7, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Northwesterly to the Northwest corner of Lot 15, Block 7, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn. ; thence Westerly to the Southeast corner of Lot 5, Block 8, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Northwesterly to the Northwest corner of Lot 19, Block 8, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Westerly to the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 9, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Northwesterly to the Northwest corner of Lot I, Block 9, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County; thence Northerly to the Southeast corner of Lot 11, Block 5, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Northwesterly to the Northwest corner of Lot 12, Block 5, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Westerly to the Northeast .corner of Lot 9, Block 4, South Hirriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn.; thence Southwesterly’to the Southwest corner of Lot 11, Block 4, South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn., which is the point of beginning. thence I Florence B. Hallberg Village Clerk 5/1/67 1Iotl"on for there were adoption of the resolution was s five ayes and no nays and the re Mayor U Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 165-2 GRANTED FIRST READING. Mr. Hyde presented-Ordinance No. 165-2 which authorizes the Village to perform certain services such as tree trimming.and removal, sidewalk repair and street oiling and assess the cost against the benefited properties. Village Manager the option of ordering the work done in the event that it is not . done by the property owners. Trustee VanValkenburg then offered.0rdinance No. 165-2 for First Reading as follows: It was pointed out that the ordinance as proposed simply gives the THE VILLAGE COUNCIL . ORDINANCE NO. 165-2 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE OILING AND OTHER DUST TREATMENT OF STREETS, WEED ELIMINATION FROM - STREETS OR PRIVATE PROPERTY, TRIMMING, CARE AND REMOVAL OF TREES, AND REPAIR OF SIDEWALKS, AND FOR THE COLLECTION OF THE-COST OF SUCH WORK AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGAINST PROPERTY BENEFITED: OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 165 Section 1. "Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance-No. 165 of the Village as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.101, the Village Manager may from time to time order the 'oiling, sprinkling or other dust treatment of streets and alleys, including maintenance work incidental and necessary to such dust treatment, or the trimming and care of trees and the removal of unsound trees within a public way or boulevard, or.the repair of sidewalks, or the eliminat5on of weeds from streets or private property. the location and type of work to be done. order to the Diyector of Public Works and Engineering, or in the case of trimming, care or removal of trees to the Village Forester. Engineering 01, Village Forester shall then have such work done by directly purchasing the necessary materials and employing day labor, or by entering into contracts for such work with private parties. In the case of oiling or other treatment of a street which is divided down the center line thereof between the Village and a neighborlihg- municipality, the work may be done and the cost apportioned as may be provided by a coopez?ative agreement with the neighboring municipality." Section 2 of said ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: The Director of Public Works and Engineering or the Village Forester, shall keep records of and report to the Village Clerk the cost of such work, including the cost of all such work done on any streets or portions thereof situated beyond the Village boundaries done under a cooperative agreement with a neighboring municipality. It and publication. Manager may Order Certain Work Done. The order shall state The Manager shall transmit a copy of such The Director of Public Works and I Section 2. "Section 2. Record of Cost. Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage Trustee Johnson went on record as opposing First Reading at this time. ORDINANCE NO. 67B GRANTED FIRST READING. provides for licenses and standards for well construction and repair. Nr. Hyde presented Ordinance No. 67B which Trustee VanValkenburg then offered First Reading for Ordinance No. 67B ai follows: ORDINANCE NO. 67B AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION, EXTENSION AND REPAIR OF INDIVIDUAL WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS ; REQUIRING LICENSES AND PERMITS BEFORE DOING SUCH WORK; PROVIDING FOR INSPECTION THEREOF; AND PRESCRIBING A PENALTY. THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE-OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: repair or alter any well in the Village unless such person shall have first obtained a license from the Village to do such work. interest in his business or employed by him to carry on such work in his name, or shall knotjingly permit another to use his name in obtaininn a license. Section 1. .License Required. No person shall construct, reconstruct, dig, drill, Sec. 2. Fraudulent Use of Name. No person shall pekmit abother not having an Sec. 3. Application for License. ThB applicaiit shali state the following in the application for a license: (a) His..name and business and home addresses, or if the applicant'is a partner- ship, association or corporation, the name 5nd address of such partnership, association or corporation; - 5/1/67 f 81- Ch (b) If the applicant is a partnership, the names and business addresses of all parties; if the applicant is an association or corporation, the names and business and home addresses of the majority of the owners thereof; -- --.' in well drilling and repair. this ordinance shall be $10.00. provisions of Ordinance No. 20 of the Village, including the penalty provisions thereof, shall apply to all licenses required by this ordinance and to the holders of such licenses, except that every license hereunder shall expire on the first day of January next following. Surety Bond.. No license for installation of wells and well repairs shall be effective until the licensee shall have executed and deposited with the Village Clerk a bond in the penal. sum of $2,000, with corporate surety approved by the Village Manager, which bond shall be conditioned that the applicant will save the Village harmless from all actions or damages arising from his making connections, repairs and installations of wells or well repair of any kind, and that he will pay all permit fees and penalties lmposed upon him, and will reimburse the Village for any expense khich it may incur in completing, reconstructing or repairing-any faulty or incomplete work done or to be done by him. done under the license during thez?period from the date of issuance to the date 6f expiration of the license. shall also furnish proof that a policy of public liability insurance has been procured with respect to work to be performed by him during the licerise period, for death or personal injury arising therefrom to any person or persons, in amounts of not less than $100,000 for each person and $300,000 for each incident, and for damage to property arising from any incident in the amount of not'less than $50,000. Sec. 8. Permits; Fee. Before proceeding with the construction of a new well or any major reconstruction of an existing well, (including deepening of an existing well to the next deeper stratum) the licensee shall first obtain a written permit from the Enforcing Officer and also the latter's approval of plans and specifications, and shall pay a permit fee of $25.00. upon printed forms furnished by the Building Department for such purposes. . located and constructed that it will not be contaminated by any existing or future sewage disposal system. contamination of the well from all possible external sources within the geological strata surrounding the well. be so constructed and located as to be above all possible sou5ces of pollution. well shall be located closer than three feet to the outside basement wall of a dwelling. No well shall be located closer than 15 feet to a-property line. The following minimum distances between a well and possible sources of contamination shall be complied with : (c) A description of the experience of each person named in the application Sec. 4. License Fee. The annual license fee for the license required by Sec. 5. License Procedure and Control; Penalties; License Period., The ' Sec. 6. The bond shall apply to all Work to be Sec. 7. Liability Insurance. The applicant for a well or well repair license Applications for permits shall be made in writing Each water supply system shall be so It shall also be so'constructed as to minimize the possible Sec. 9. Protection from Coritamination. Wells shall be located in a manner to be free from flooding and the top shall No (1) (2) (3) Buried or concealed extra heavy cast iron sewer'or drain lines with lead caulked, air tested joints - 20 feet. Vitrified-clay or concrete sewers (or cast iron sewers not of construction described above), septic tanks - 50 feet. Dry wells, seepage pits, cesspools, drain fields - 100 feet. No well shall hereafter be installed in a pit or basement below the surface of No well constructed in the Village shall terminate in the Decorah Shale, the ground level. Platteville Limestone or Shakopee-Oneota Dolomite. in depth to terminate in those formations. well casing shall be four inches. coupled steel or wrought iron and shall conform to the following specifications for w6ight and thickness: Weight Per Lin. Ft. With Threads and No existing well shall be increased The minimum diameter of any finished Sec. 10. Specifications for Well Casings. Well casings shall be constructed of welded or Diameter 4" Wall Thickness .237 inches Couplings 10.98 lbs. 5 ,258 inches 14.8 lbs. 6 .280 inches 19 . 45' Ibs . 8" .322 inches 29.35 lbs. LO" .365 inches 41.85 lbs. 12" .375 inches 51.15 lbs. Well Casing Depth; Sealing Off Certain Formations. The casing of any well constructed entirely in unconsolidated earth formations shall extend to a depth of 100 feet below established groldllevel or through the first impervious soil formation encountered, whichever is ' deeper; and at least five feet bel6w pcmping level (level below ground level to which the water surface is lowered in the well during pumping). constructibn at a depth which satisfies these minimum requirements, the acceptability of the formation for well development shall be based on the satisfactory results of Sec. 11. Where a water-bearing formation is encountered during well 5/1/67 c analysis of the water by the Village laboratory or the Village Public Health Sanitarian. evidenced by the presence of chemicals or bacteria of sewage origin, shall be regarded as unsatisfactory for well development. Where a well is drilled to tepminate in the St. Pker Sandstone or the Jordan Sandstone, the Decorah, Platteville and Shakopee formations shall 6e sealed off. In the case of a well finished at a diameter of"4"'and extending through the Platteville- Limestone , this shall be accomplished by installing a minihum' 5-inch . diameter casing from the surface through the glacial drift and into the Platteville Limestone. A nominal 5-inch (minimum) open hole shall then be drilled through the undesirable formations and at least 20 feet into the continuous non-faulty consolidated St. Peter Sandstone and/or at least 20 feet bhlow the pumping'water level, whichever is lower. to the bottom of the 5i-inch hole and the bottom 10 feet shall be grouted in place. formation such distance as is necessary to provide the required water supply. case of wells larger than 4 inches, all other component parts of the well shall be constructed proportionally. Sec. 12. Minimum Water Production. All wells hereafter constructed in the Village shall produce a minimum initial supply of 900 gallons of sandfree water per hour;- See. 13. Pump and Equipment. The pump and equipment shall be installed in a manner satisfactory to the Enforcing Officer and shall c6nform to the following: (1) frost-proof installation. (2) wat er-tight mounting. (3) easily installed, removed and reinstalled should it become necessary to remove the drop pipe for repair. (4) above the basement floor level and the seal shall be so constructed and installed as to maintain its water-tight feature, should flooding occur. shall be at least 6 inches above the surrounding gdde'and the concrete platform shall be dnimum 4 inches above grade at the edge. (5) installed less than 10 feet below grade, shall be provided with an outline protective casing. casing. watertight joint which will permit easy removal. upward toward the pump. well Xocated some distance from the basement, the pump shall be located at least 18 inches above the basement floor. Pitless underground discharges shall extend 12 inches above surr6unding grade. Provisions shall be made in the well seal for future measurements of static and pump levels. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to the Building Department and shall include the property address, location of sewage disposal system or sewer, boundaries of property being served, location of all present or proposed structures on such plot and' such other pertinent information as may be required by the Enforcing 'Officer. Sec. 14. Chlorination. After final installation of the pumping equipment or completion of any repairs on a well, the well shall be pumped continuously until the water is free of Turbidity, then chlorinated heavily in accordance with the following procedure: calcium hyp'ochlorite (chlorinated lime) by -scattering same over the surface of the water in the well so that the powder will sink to th& bottom, thereby permeating the supply. If powder cannot be introduced directly, then mix onb pound of calcium hypochlorite, high test (70% or equivalent), with five gallons of water and pour the mixture into the well. then puinp to baste until the odor and taste of the Lhemical have practically disappeared. ' used, they shall remain in the well for a minimum pGriod of 48 hours before the water is pumped to waste as described above. doses of the chemical for chlorination but shall not have a concentration of applied solution less than 150 parts per million for twelve hours. with the requirements of the Minnesota State Department of Health for public water supplies as set forth in the Nanual of Water Supply Sanitation (Small-Power Pump and Hand Pump Installations), Section VII, Paragraphs 701-722, dated 1965, published by Any water-bearing formation yielding water which is contaminated, as I A minimum 4-inch liner shall then b& installed fr6m *he surface ' In The nominal &inch open hole*shall be continued into the water-bearing . Pump and equipment shall be designed'to assure a pollutioniproof and The pump base shall be constructed so as to permit installation of a A well seal shall be used. Such well seal shall be of simple construction, The top of an existing well casing shall be a minimum of 18 inches The pump room floor Suction lines installed thsough the well casing, or where dth&wise ' I Such protective casing shall be set wategtight into the well The suction line shall be caulked into the protective casing to provide a The sudtion line shall slope Where a suction line is brought into a basement from a (6) (7) (1) Introduce into the well one pouhd of high test (70% or equivalFnt) (2) I (3) Allow the chemical to remain in the well for at least twelve hours, * ' (4) Where calcium hypochlorite tablets meeting the above requirements are Wells larger than four inches in diametir require proportionally larger ( 5 1 Sec. 15. Requirements for Commercial Wells. All commercial wells shall comply 5/1/67 the Minnesota Department of Health. Copy," have been placed on file for use and examination in the office of the Village Clerk. of the well and pumping equipment, a pumping test of sufficient duration to determine the yield and maximum drawdown shall be conducted. An inspection must be called for and the Inspector will take a test sample for analysis at this time. Within fifteen days after inspection of the well, the permit holder shall file an affidavit with the Building Department setting forth the results of the pumping test, the capacity of the aell, the pumping level, the depth of casing from grade and length and size of screen if one is used. in drilling each well shall be kept by the driller. A copy of said log, typed on 8-1/2 x 11'' paper, shall be filed along with the well affidavit and such log shall specifically state where impervious formation is encountered. Failure to provide such a log or affidavit, or willful failure to provide accurate information with respect thereto shall constitute a violation of this ordinance. Sec. 18. Sealing Abandoned Well. When any well is abandoned or taken out of service, it must be sealed to the satisfaction of the Enforcing Officer. Sec. 19. Wells for Disposal Forbidden. The construction of a well for the purpose of disposing of any liquids, including surface waters, air conditioning, or commercial wastes, shall be prohibited in the Village. Sec. 20. Definitions. The following terms used in this ordinance are defined as follows: (1) Drawdown - The change in surface elevation of a body of water as the result of the withdrawal of water therefrom. (2) Glacial Drift - An assemblage of deposits 1eft.by:the melting of an ice sheet or glacier. of all sizes which formed at the margin of the ice. cement, sand and water in the following proporions: Three copies of said manual, marked "Official Sec. 16. Final Test, Inspection and Report. Upon completion of chlorination Sec. 17. Geological Loa Required. A geological log of the formations encountered It is composed of an accumulation of unstrafified material (3) Grout - A thin mortar consisting of portland cement and water or portland (a) (b) one sack cement to 4-1/2 to 5-1/2 gallons of water, or one part cement, one part clean sand and 4-112 to 6 gallons water. loss of grout to crevices or faults occurs. The sang grout shall be used only where abnormal (4) Log - A chronological record of the soil and rock formations encountered in the operation of drilling a well, with either their thickness, or the elevation of the top and bottom of each formation given. It also includes statements as to the composition and eater-bearing characteristics of each formation. Porosity - An index of the void characteristics of a soil as it pertains Turbidity - A condition of a liquid due to fine visiblqmaterial in (5) (6) to percolation. .. suspension, which may not be of sufficient size to be seen as individual particles by the naked eye but which prevents the passage of light through the liquid. Yield - The quantity of water flow (gallons per minute or per hour) * which can be collected (pumped) from the well. Enforcing Officer - The Public Health Sanitarian or his deputy; however, inspections hereunder may be carried out by other Village empftoyees assigned to do so by the Enforcing Officer. provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any amount not to exceed $100 or imprisoned for not to exceed 90 days. offense. arid publication. (7) (8) Sec, 21. Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation violating any of the Each day that any violation is continued shall constitute a separate Sec. 22. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage ORDINANCE NO. 171-3 GRANTED FIRST READING. Mr. Hyde presented Ordinance No. 171-3 for First Reading as recommended by the Police Department. to raise the taxicab driver's license fee to $5 .OO to conform with fees charged by other municipalities and to provide that drivers licensed by either Richfield, Bloomington, Hopkins, St. Louis Park or Golden Valley may operate within the Village of Edina. Trustee MacMillan then offered Ordinance No. 171-3 for First Reading as f 0 1 lows : This ordinance is proposed ORDINANCE NO. 171-3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 RELATING TO THE LICENSING OF TAXICAB DRIVERS Section 1. Section 9 of Ordinance No. 171, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follov7s: "Section 9. Taxicab Driver's License. No person shall drive a taxicab, nor shall permit an employee to drive a taxicab within the Village without such driver having first obtained a taxicab driver's license pursuant to this ordinance, or a taxicab driver's license issued by the City of Richfield, the City of Bloomington, the of HoPkins, the City of St. Louis Park, or the Village of Golden Valley; THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF TI% VILLAGE OF EDINA,~BIINNESOTA, ORDAINS: \ provided, that any driver licensed to operate in another municipality in this state may carry passeneers from such municipality where licensed to any place or point within the Village, and may freely enter and travel upon the streets and thorough- fares €or that purpose, and may receive passengers for carriage to said municipality where so licensed, and in such case it shall not be deemed necessary for the driver of such vehicle to be licensed as herein required, but such driver shall not be per- mitted to solicit or pick up business on the streets of the Village except when a return trip has been previously arranged, or to otherwise operate within the Village without being licensed under the provisions of this ordinance. corporate limits of the Village, the driver of suck vehicle from another municipality shall observe all the regulations and conditions of this ordinance and shall have with him the license certificate for said vehicle and display the same to any person on demand." to read as follows: shall be accompanied by the annual license fee of $5." its passage and publication. ORDINANCE NO. 23B-1 GRANTED FIRST READING. as recommended by the Police Department for First Reading. retain the limication of persons under the age of 18 Erom.playing the machines which are equipped to permit free play or gam described under Section 1 (a) of Ordinance No. 23B, but would permit persons under the age of 18 to play amusement devices de- scribed under Section l, paragraph (b) of Ordinance No. 23B, which are not equipped to permit free play or game. for First Reading as follows: While withi-n the Sec. 2. Section 11 of said ordinance, as amended, is hereby further amended "Section 11. License Fee. Sec. 3. The application for a taxicab driver's license This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon Mr. Hyde presented Ordinance No. 23B-1 This ordinance would Trustee Courtney then offered Ordinance No. 23-B-1 ORDINANCE NO. 23B-1 AN ORDINANCE &ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 23B, RELATING TO llJ3CHANICAL AMJSEXENT DEVICES THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF TTHE VSLLAGE OF EDINA, HINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. '*Section 8. Section 8 of Ordinance No. .23B is hereby amended to read as No machine of the types described in follows : paragraph (a) of Section 1 may be played or used by any person under the age of 18 unless he is accompanied by a parent or natural guardian, nor shall any person in charge of the premises where the machine is located permit the machine to be played or used in violation of this section.tt its passage and publication. L Op eration by Blinors. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL AID FROM STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT was made upon recommendation of Mr. Hite, whereupon Trustee IIacMillan offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, That pursuant to statutory authority, the Village Engineer for and on behalf of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, isahereby authorized to request and obtain from the Minnesota Department of Highways, needed engineering and technical services during the year of 1967, for which payment will be made by the Village of Edina upon receipt of verified claims from the Commissioner of Highways Plotion for adoption of the resolution w rollcall there were five ayes anqno na Courtney and on ATTEST : 0 2zdL&UQ* 4 '- Village Clerk 112 TON PICK-UP TRUCK WITH SEKVICE BODY BIDS TO BE TAKEN. Upon recommendation of 3lr. Dalen, Trustee Johnson's motion authorizing advertising for bids for a 1/2 ton pick-up truck with service body was seconded by Trustee XacMillan and unanimously carried. PLABNl3R'S SALARY REVISION APPROVED. order to-hire a Planner with the required qualifications it may be necessary to offer more salary than had been approved in the 1967 Salary Resolution. Valkenburg then offered the following-resolution and moved its adoption: Nr. Hyde advised that it would appear that in Trustee Van 1. 5/1/67 \ 5' RESOLUTION ,I BE IT RESOLVED that the 1967 Salary Resolution be amended to alloi a maximum salary of $9,000 for the Planning Technician. Motion for adoption'of the resolution waq rollcall there were five ayes and no nays .. .- - ATTEST : Mayor R Y ". U BRIDGE BIDS TO BE TAKEN. BR-1 located on Valley View Road over the Minneapolis , Northfield, and Southern Railroad and known as Bridge 27541 (S.A.P. No. 20-151-02, Municipal Aid Street 1511, Upon recommendation by Mr. Hite that bids be taken for I Trustee MacMillan offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AND DIECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT NO. 1 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvement set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the Village Engineer and now on file in the office of the Village Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Courier and Construction Bulletin the following notice for bids for improvement: ' (Official Publication) VILLAGE OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS BRIDGE 27541, GRADING AND MISCELLANEOUS WORK BIDS CLOSE MAY 12, 1967 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in the Edina Village Hall, 4801 W. 50th St., at 11:OO A.M., Friday, May 12, 1967, and the Edina Village Council will meet at 7:OO P.M. on Monday, May 15, 1967, to consider said bids for the construction of Bridge 27541, Grading, and Miscellaneous work. Bridge 27541, Grading5 and Miscellaneous Work S.A.P. No. 20-151-02 (Municipal Aid Street 151) located on Valley View Road over the Minneapolis, Northfield, and Southern Railroad. work is Bridge No. 27541, 35' x 100' continuous, composite, steel beam span. The major quantity of The principal items of work under the grading portion of the contract are: ESTIMATED Class A Excavation QUANTITY 1440 C.Y. Embankment Material In-Place 4820 COY. 10" Gravel Sub-Base In-Place, Class 4 3110 S.Y. 3050 S.Y. 5" Gravel Base In-Place, Class 5 1-1/2" Plant-Mixed Binder Course in Place 1210 S.Y. 1" Road-Mixed Bituminous Base In-Place 2160 S.Y, 1-1/211 Plant-Mixed Wearing Course In-Place and Filler 2210 S.Y. Proposals, plans and specifications may be examined and secured at the office of the Consulting Engineers, Jacus E Amble, Inc., 300 Builders Exchange Building, Minneapolis, Minnesota. This deposit shall be refunded upon receipt of a bonafide bid in accordance with the specifications and after return of unmarked and useable set of plans and specifications. The Village.Engineer shall have a set of the above for examination purposes only. Bids must be accompanied by aCertified Check or a Bidders Bond made in favor of the Village of Edina for at least 10% of the amount of the proposal. The Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL. A deppsit of $25.00 will be required for each set requested, Florence B. Hallberg Village Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution rollcall there were five ayes and no n I ATTEST : 5/1/67 CLAIMS PAID. for payment ofthe following Claims as per Pre-List: Construction Fund, $66.15; Park, Park *Sinking, Park Construction, Golf Course and Arena, $1,813.04; Water Fund, $57.78; Liquor Fund, $96,500.60; Sewer Rental Fund, $352.64; Improvement Fund, $113,965.76; Total, $221,991.00; and for confirmat5on of the following payment : Motion by Trustee Johnson was seconded by Trustee MacMillan and carried General Fund, $9,235.03; 4/18/67 Postmaster $500 .oo General The agenda's business having been covered, Trustee Macl-fillan's motion for adjournment was seconded by Trustee Courtney and carried. Adjournment at 10:05 P.M. P iL-e.4- z8Lah-4 /? Village Clerk .. .I.