HomeMy WebLinkAbout19671226_regularNINUTES OF THE REGULARMEETING OF THE
EDINA VILLAGE,COUNCIL,HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER. 26, 1967
4:30 P.M.
Mem-ers ansfering rollcall were Trustees Courtney, Johnson, MacMiLan, VanValkenburg
and Mayor Bredesen.
MINUTES of the meeting of December 4, 1967, were*Aapprovec3 as.corrected by motion of
Trustee Johnson, seconded by Trustee Courtney and carried.. Trustee Johnson's correc-
tion was that the phrase, "unless the zoning ordinance should be amended as to R-2
Multiple Residence District lot size" should be deleted from the motion denying the
zoning change request of Mr. H. J. Bach for the property at 6329 Brookview Avenue, I
MALIBU DRIVE, TELEIfARK TRAIL STREET IMPROVEEENTS APPROVED. Affidavits of,Publication
in the Edina Courier on December 14 and 21, ahd of Mailing on December 15, 1967, were
approved as to form as presented by Clerk and ordered placed on file.
notice given, public hearing was conducted and action taken as hereinafter recorded.
A,
Pursuant to due
CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE
FOLLOWING :
Malibu Drive from South line of Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition to North line of
Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition
Telemark Trail from Parkwood Road to Malibu Drive
Mr. Hyde presented estimated construction cost at $40,904.02 proposed to be assessed
against 2824.80 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $14.48 per assessable foot.
No persons being present to offer objections, Trustee VanValkenburg offered the fol-
lowing resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-118
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina,.Minnesota, that this
Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners
of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed im-
provement:
1. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SYRFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE
FOLLOWING:
Malibu Drive from South line of Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition to North line of
Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition
Telemark Trail from Parkwood Road to Malibu Drive I and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council
has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of
the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the constructian of said
improvement including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for
fAe acquisition of necessary easements .and rights for construction and maintenance of
such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to
in all subsequent proceedings as STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-118 and the area ta be
specially assessed therefore shall include all.lots and trac ts of land abutting the
streets proposed to be improved.,Motion
by Trustee Johirson and on rollcall there
Mayor
lution was adopted.
ATTEST :
*YLEt *&. $!LLLLQ/
Village Clerk
MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT GRANTED FIRST READING. Nr. Hois-
ington presented the Multiple Residence District Ordinance Amendment 261-156 which
had been continued from the meeting of December 4.
sented a comparison of the existing Multiple Residence District Ordinance and the
proposed amendment. In reply to questions of Trustee Courtney questioning the re-
duction in R-2 minimum total lot area from 18,000 square feet to 12,000 square feet,
Mr, Hoisington pointed out that the majority of double dwellings in the Village are
on lots which are considerably smaller than the presently required 18,000 square feet.
Following some discussion, it was agreed that 15,000 square feet would be a reasonable
lot size for R-2 dwellings. Mr. Hite pointed out that the required building setbacks
from R-1 District boundaries have been increased in both the R-4 and R-5 (high rise)
Districts.
had not been changed and was dependent on the setback. In reply to a question of
Trustee Johnson, Mr. Hoisington pointed out that the Colony Apartment area is the
only existing undeveloped R-5 District in the Village. He further questioned the
advisability of encouraging more dense population in apartment buildings adjoining
As requested by Council, he pre-
8 .
He further stated that the maximum permitted height in the R-5 District
12/26/67
freeways and industrial and commercial areas, and pointed out that the proposed
amendment would house fewer people in more open space, Discussion ensued as to
the advisability of establikhing a limit as to the height of buildings without any ~
decision beingreached. Trustee VanValkenburg then offered Ordinance No. 261-145 fo-r
First Reading as follows: (NOTE: See correction in Minutes of January 15, 1968) I ORDINANCE NO. 261-156 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AS TO THE BOUNDARIES OF AND REGULATIONS
APPLICABLE TO THE MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT.
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
District) of the Village is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 1,
"The multiple residence district is hereby established and shall further be
The first sentence of paragraphlof Section 4 (Multiple Residence,
-
R-4 and R-5
divided inro subdistricts. designated as District R-2, District R-3, District
R-4, and District* R-5."
The territory included in District R-6 in said paragraph is hereby removed therefrom
and added to the territory included in District R-5, as follows:
part of Lot 31, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, lying North of the South 177.5 feet
thereof .'I - -
All references to and regulations applicable to District R-6 in para-_ -
Paragraph 3 of Sectj,on 4 of said Ordinance is hereby amended to read
"(23) The North 122.5 feet of Lot 20, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, and that
"(24)
Sec. 2.
Sec..3.
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Town RealtyJs Edina Terrace 111 Addition." tv e
r.3 U as follows: u "3. Restrictions on Lot Area, Building Bulk and Setbacks. In determining the
graphs 2 and 7 of said Section 4 of said ordinance are hereby deleted.
applicable restriction, the most restrictive of the follpwing standards shall govern:
(a)
ahall not be less than the sum of the minimum lot area for each dwelling unit thereon,
adjusted by the allowances permitted or imposed hereunder, and in no event less than
the minimum total lot area: -
Basic Requirement - -
District Minimum Lot Area Per Minimum Total Lot
Required Lot Area. The required number of square feet of total lot area
Dwelling Unit Area
6,000 square feet 15,000 square, feet
- 4,400 square feet 17,600 square feet - 2,500 square feet 24,000 square feet
1 g
R- 5 2,500 square feet I 2 acres
Maximum Amount of Allovance Permitted
District Maximum Allowance
R- 2 -~ None
R- 3
R- 5
District Basis end Amount of Allowance
R-2 No allowances
R- 3
1,500 spare feet per dwelling unit
11 11 II 11 R-4 1,500 I' *.
Schedule of Allowances ..
2,000 11 11 It I1
1. For each parking stall in or under the multiple
residence or otherwise completely underground;
subtract 500 sq. ft.
If the multiple residence is a part of a planned
multiple residence project involving no less than
3 acres of usable land and no allowance is avail-
able under items 2 or 3 above; subtract 500 sq.
ft, per dwelling unit.
For each bedroom in excess of two in any one
dwelling unit; add 500 sq, ft.
For each parking stall in or under the multiple
residence or otherwise completely underground,
subtract 500 sq. ft,
If the multiple residence district is a part of
a planned multiple residence projec; involving
no less than three acres of usable land, subtract
500 square feet per dwelling unit.
is more than four stories in height, subtract 100
square feet per dwelling unit per story in excess
of four, up to and including a maximum of 1000
4. If the total lot coverage is less than ten percent,
5.
2.
3.
i.
2.
3. In the R-5 District, if the multiple residence
sq. ft.
subtract 250 sq. ft. per dwelling unit.
For each bedroom in excess of two in any one dwel-
ling unit, add 500 sq. ft.
12/26/67
(b) Lot Coverage and Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
District
R-2
* Maximum Lot Coverage
20%
Haximum FAR
_. --- R- 3 20%
R-4 30%
R-5 25% 1.2
The floor area ratio is the gross floor area of all buildings on a lot divided by the
lot area.
---
(c) Building Height *
District
R-2 and R-3
R-4
Minimum No. of Stories Maximum No. of St. j
2.
4 --- R-5 5
(d) Usable Lot -Area.
provided on the lot occupied by the multiple residence building. This space must be
easily accessible for daily use by the residents-of the multiple residence building.
Driveways, parking areas, purely ornamental areas, areas having a width of less than
20 feet and requi.red side or front kard shall not be considered as Usable Lot Area.
District * Square Feet Per Dwelling Unit':
R-3 and R-4 400
R-5
R-5
R- 6 100
Outdoor" living space in the amount specified belot7 must be
200 - 5 and 6 story buildings
100 - over 6 stories *.
*Increase all figures by 100 sq. ft. 1.
"
if dwelling unit has in excess of two bedrooms.
(e) Lot Area Computation.
used in calculating lot areas.
Lot depths in excess of 200% of lot widths shall not be
(f) Setbacks and Yards
District Front
R- 2 30
Side Street
15
Interior
Side
10
Rear
40 -
R- 3 35 30 20 40
shall be no less than 35 feet or the average height of the building, whichever is
greater, for buildings 4 stories or less in height. A building whose length is equal
to or exceeds 4 times its average height shall have an average front yard setback of-
not less than a distance equal to twice its average height. In. the R-5 District, any
structure 5 or 6 stories in height shall be no closer to any R-1 District properties-,
except those utilized for non-residential purposes, than 2 times the average height of
the building. For a 7 or 8 story structure, the setback shall be no less than 3 times
the building height and for a structure 9 or more stories in height, the setback shall
be no less than 4 times the building height from any R-1 District properties, except-
those utilized for non-residential purposes.
See. 4. In paragraph 4 of Section 4 of said ordinance, subparagr?ph (b) is -
hereby deleted.
See. 5.
read as fo1lows:
I1(i)
hot+~less;khan~500 net square feet, that of a one bedroom dwelling unit shall be not-
less than 750 net square feet, and that of a two bedroom dwelling unit shall be not
less than 950 net square feet. *Units containing three or more bedrooms shall have an
additional 150 net square feet of floor area for each bedroom in excess of two bedrooms,
area within a building used as a single dwelling unit, and shall be measured from the
inside of outside walls to the canter of partitions bounding the dwelling unit being
measured, but shall not include public stairways, public entries, public foyers, public
balconies, or unenclosed public porches, separateutility rooms, furnace areas or rooms,
storage areas not. within the apartment, or garages,"
reaa as follows:
built at an elevation lower than the elevation ofathe ground at the building site."
This ordinance shall be i'n full force and effect immediately upon its
'passage.and publication. (NOTE:
In Districts R-4 and R-5, the minimum building setback from any property line
-
-
Subparagraph (c) of paragraph 4 of said ordinance is hereby amended to
Floor Area. The minimum floor area of an efficiency dwelling unit shall bEi:
For purposes of measurement, the net floor area of a dwelling unit shall mean that
Sec. 6. Subparagraph (e) of paragraph 4 of said ordinance is hereby amended to-
"(e) No dwelling unit or any part thereof shall be
Sec. 7, I Below Grade Dwelling-Units.
See correction in Minutes of January 15, 1968)
PUNNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ORDINANCE AMBNDMENT GRANTED FIRST READING, Affidavits of
Publication and of Posting were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered
placed on file. Mr. Hoisington advised Council that it is becoming increasingly dif-
ficult to enforce zoning ordinances on corner lots in the Planned Industrial District
due to required parking area setbacks from street property lines.
ordinance discriminates against the developer of a corner lot by imposing such street
It is felt that the
-
12/26/67
setbacks on both the front and side yards.
reduction in one required setback for-parking purposes only. A-second amendment would
utilize the Building Code to control rear yard building setbacks. The third amendment
t70Uld allow loading-facilities on a street frontage for all developments if all dock
and berth facilgties are completely enclosed. Mr..Hoisington advised that the General
Electric Corgpany is proposing to construct a building within fourteen feet of the rear
property line if the second amendment is adopted, Mr. Hite advised xhat the reaKset-
backs had been initially established for aesthetic purposes, but this control did not
ever seem to be necessary. Discussion ensued as to the possibility of limiting the
amendments for parking and loading to the side street frontage only, with the Village
to determine which street is to be considered to be the "side street." Trustee Mac
14illan then offered ordinance 261-151 for First Reading as fo~~ows:
The proposed amendment would allow a 50%
ORDINANCE NO. 261-151 .
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AS TO REGULATIONS IN THE PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
10 (Planned Industrial District) of Ordinance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village
is hereby amended to read as follows: - -
Side Yards or Rear Yards.
ing code adopted by the Village to have openings in the rear wall, shall be erected
no closer than 30 feet to a-rear property line. tfiere rear wall openings are not re-
quired by any such code, buildings or structures may be constructed to within 10 feet
of a rear property line.
side property line than a distance equal to one and one-half times the average build-
ing height. Where the District abuts or adjoins a residential district, the side or
rear yard abutting such residential district shall be not less than 100 feet."
Section 2. Subparagraph (d) of paragraph 6 of said Section 10 of Ordinance No.
261 is hereby amended to read as fOllOb7S: . "(d) Off-street Parking. Off-street parking areas of sufficient size to provide
parking for patrons, customers, suppliers, visitors and employees shall be provided on
the premises of each uses Parking areas shall be surfaced with a hard, all-weather,
durable, dust-free surfacing material and shall be properly drained and landscaped,
and shall be maintained in a sightly and well-kept condition. No parking area shall
occupy apy required setback except on lots, tracts, or parcels having two or more
street frontages. On lots, tracts, or parcels having two or more street frontages, I
50% of the required setback from one of the streets, designated as a thoroughfare,
collector, minor, or secondary street and not adjoining a residential district, may be
occupied for parking purposes only; provided, however that parking shall not be loc-
ated within the required setback area in front of the building. No parking shall be
located closer than ten feet to a side or rear lot line, nor closer than ten feet to
any building.
imum depth of 19 feet exclusive of aisles and maneuvering space. All parking areas
containing more than six spaces which face either a public street or residentially
zoned property shall have a solid wall or fence of not less than four feet nor more
than six feet in height along such facing.
that they are architecturally harmonious with the principal structures on the lot.
screen planting approved by the Village Council may be substituted for the required
wall or fence."
Section 3.
tion 10 of Ordinance No. 261 is hereby amended to read as follows:
"(3)
located within the perimeter of the building housing the principal or accessory use.
Where located on a sfreet frontage, they shall be completely enclosed.
be located within the required side'or rear yards.
separated from areas used for off-street parging except for connecting driveways or
aisles.
Section 1. Subsubparagraph (2)(b) of subparagraph (c) of paragraph 6 of Section
"(b) Any building or structure required by any build-
No building or gtructure shall be erected any closer to a
Each parking space shall have a minimum width of 8-112 feet and a min-
Such fences or walls shall be so designed
A
Subsubparagraph (3) of.subparagraph (e) of Paragraph 6 of said Sec-
Location. Loading berths shall not be located on a street frontage unless
No berth shall
All berths shall be physically
No maneuvering area shall be located within ten feet of a side or rear prop-
- erty line." ..
Section 4. This ordinance shall be in fkl force and effect imediately upon
its passage and publication.
QBERMEYER WAREHOUSE PARKING TO BE CONTROLLED.
regulations are consistently being violated at the Obermeyer Warehouse. Mr. Hite ad-
vised that because the building is being used for manufacturing, rather than as a ware-
house as originally planned, more employees are working in the building and consequently
on site parking facilities are not adequate. Mr; Hyde advised that Obermeyer Warehouse
officials would be advised that on-street parking would not be permitted.
LAGUNA DRIVE STREET VACATION continued to January 8, 1968, by motion of Trustee Van
Valkenburg, seconded by Trustee Courtney and carried.
Mayor Bredesen pointed out that parking
J 12/26/67
BIDS AWARDED FOR FOURJJHEEL STREET-SWEEPER.
taken Friday, December 8, 1967, in response to Advertisement for Bids in the Edina
Mr, Hyde presented tabulation of two bids
Courier and- Construction-Bulletin on November 23, 1967, for a four wheel streee sweeper
for the Department of Public Works, . Tabulation of bids showed Hayden-Murphy Equipment
low bidder at $12,000.00 and Hall Equipment, Inc., high bidder at $12,250,00 for the
-four-wheel street-sweeper with automatic transmission. Trustee MacMillan's motion for
award to recommended low bidder, Hayden-Murphy Equipment, was then seconded by Trustee
Johnson and unanimously carried.
DUMP TRUCKS BID AWARDED.
8, 1967, in response to Advertisement for Bids in the Edina Courier and Construction
Bulletin on November 23, 1967. Tabulation showed International Harvester low bidder
for two dump trucks with standard transmission at $11,788.87, Iten Chevrolet second
low bidder at $12,524.00, Market Ford third low bidder at $12,558.00 and Jordon Ford
high bidder at $12,981,30.
low bidder, International Harvester, t7as seconded by Trustee Johnson and carried.
FOUR-WHEEL RUBBER-IIIRED TRACTOR TO BE REBID. Because certain criteria had not been
-specified in the Advertisement for Bids published-in the Edina Courier and Construc-
tion Bulletin on 11/23/67, trustee MacMillan's motion that new bids be taken for one
four-wheel rubber-tired tractor was seconded by Trustee VanValkenburg and carried.
Mr. Hyde presented tabulation of bids taken Friday, December I
Trustee MacMillan's motion for award of bid to recommended
HEARING DATES SET FOR VARIOUS LOT DIVISIONS.
8, 1968, t7as set for hearing date for lot divisions of Lot 2, Block 1, Farmers First
Addition, Lot 1, Block 2, Amundson Terrace Lot 4, Block 1, Loudon, and Lot.4, Auditor's
Subdivision 325 by motion of Trustee Johnson, seconded by Trustee VanValkenburg and
carried.
Upon recommendation of Mr. Hite, January
NORTHWFST CORNER EDEN AVENUE AND TRWK HIGHWAY 108 ZONING CHANGE HEARING DATE SET,
Upon recommendation of Nr. Hite, January 15, 1968, was set for the hearing date for
the request of Adolphson & Peterson for zoning change from R-1 District to Office
Building District for the Northwest corner of Eden Avenue and Trunk Highway 100.
DEPENDABLE EXCAVATING COMPANY TEBPORARY EXCAVATION DISTRICT HEARING DATE SET.
recommendation of Mr. Hite January 8, 1968, was set as hearing date for request of
Dependable Excavating Company for.establishment of a Temporary Excavation District
for the area located at York Avenue South extended between Vest 74th Street and Vest
76th Street.
OLIVE REILLY ZONING CHANGE FOR LOTS 6 AND 7, BLOCK 6, TINGDALE BROTHERS, BROOKSIDE.
Mr, Hite advised Council that Planning Commission had recommended rejection of a
zoning change for Lots 6 and 7, Block 6, Tingdale Brothers Brookside Addition from
Residential District R-1 to Commercial District. Trustee VanValkenburg's motion for
confirming the denial of the Planning Commission was seconded by Trustee Courtney and
carried.
..
Upon
LIBRARY BID TOTAL CORRECTED. Mr. Dalen advised that it had been noted that the total
of all bids for the new Edina Library amounted to $410,446.50 rather than $410,746.50
as recorded in the Minutes of October 2, 1967.
the Minutes be corrected to reflect the proper total. was seconded by Trustee Johnson
and carried.
Trustee VanValkenburg's motion that
TEEN AGE RECREATION BOARD ORDINANCE CONTINUED TO JANUARY 8, 1968, in order to give
Council members an opportunity to study the ordinance by motion of Trustee Johnson,
seconded by Trustee Courtney and carried, - -
E. J. MC CUBREY TRANKED UPON RETIREMENT, Upon being advised by Mr. Hyde of .the retire-
ment of Hr. E. J. McCubrey from the Minnesota Highway Department, Trustee VanValkenburg
offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: -
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, EVERETT (MAC) MC CUBREY is retiring after 46 years of service with the Minn-
esota Highway Department, and - WHEREAS, Mr. McCubrey served since 1951 as District Engineer of the Netropolitan Area,
during much of which time he was intimately concerned with the major highway problems
of Edina, and
I$HEREAS, it is from this position that he is retirtng,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that
sincere thanks and grateful appreciation be extended to EVERETT (MAC) MC CUBREY for
his efforts and services in cooperating with Village Officials in the development of
I
I 277 i 12/26/67
Edina' s .principal thoroughfares.
BE IT EURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be spread upon the official
Minutes of this meeting and that a copy be pres
- Motion for adoption.of the resolution was sec
ATTEST :
TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION AGREEMENT REACHED FOR FRANCE AVENUE AT
\JEST 58TH STREET AND IdEST 76TH STREET. Mr. Hyde advised that an agreement had been
reached with Hennepin County for participation in the construction and operation of
traffic control signals-at the intersections of France Avenue at 58th Street and 76th
Street.
tion:
Trustee MacMillan then offered the following resolution and moved its adop-
RE SOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Edina enter into an agreement with the - ~
County of Hennepin:
To install traffic control signals at the intersection of County State Aid
Highway No. 17 and West 59th Street and at the intersection of County State Aid
Highway No. 17 and West 76th Street in accordance with the terms and conditions
of the Agreement for Participation in the Construction and Operation of said traffic
control signals, a copy of which is before the Council, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager be and hereby are authorized
to execute said agreement and thereby assume for and on behalf of the Village all of
the contractual obligations contained therein.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was
call there were five ayes and no nays and
y and on roll-
ATTEST : Mayot I/
V tg'/&&&&&
Village Clerk
BRIDGE NO. 1 PAYMENT RATIFIED.. Mr. Dalen advised Council that payment in the amount
of $1,338.86 had been paid directly to'Bury & Carlson for additional construction on
Bridge No. 1 on Valley-View Road over the M. N. & S. tracks, rather than by a change
order on the original contract, and that a 15% saving had been made by taking this
action. Trustee VanValkenburg's motion ratifying action taken by the Village Treas-
urer was seconded by Trustee Johnson and carried.
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND RECOMMENDED TRANSFERS APPROVED. Upon recom-
mendation of Mr. Dalen, Trustee VanValkenburg's motion approving Statement of Estim-
ated Expenditures and Recommended Transfers for the year ending December 31, 1967,
was seconded by Trustee MacMillan and carried.
LIQUOR FUND LOAN TO GOLF COURSE APPROVED. Upon recommendation of Mr. Dalen, Trustee
MacMillan's motion approving a loan of $65,000 from the Liquor Fund to the Golf Course
Fund was seconded by Trustee Courtney and unanimously carried.
TRUSTEE MAC MILLAN THANKED FOR SERVICES TO VILLAGE. Trustee Johnson offered the
following resolution and moved its adoption: .
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, HUGH J. MAC MILLAN has served as Councilman of the Village of Edina
WHEREAS, Mr. MacMillan has served the Village loyally and with dedication to
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the-Village of Edina
for the past six years from January 1, 1962, until December 31, 1967, and
his duties as a member of the Council,
that grateful appreciation and sincere thanks be
his tireless efforts in behalf of the Villa
Motion for adoption of the resolution was s
sd to HUGH J. MAC MILLAN for
ATTEST : ~'A4&Qdl &/ , $7
Village Clerk
12/26/67
PLANNING COMMISSION EEMBERS RESIGN. Mayor Bredesen .advised Council that lk. T. Lea
Todd and E4r. Jack Beegle have resigned as members of the Planning Commission. Mayor
Bredesen recommended the appointment of Mr. Samuel Hughes and Mr. Walter C, Robb for
,the Planning Commission to fill the vacancies on the Commission.
cussion, Trustee VanValkenburg's motion for approval of Mr. Hughes was seconded by
Trustee.Courtney and carried unanimously.
of Mr, Robb was seconded by Trustee Johnson and carried, with Trustee Courtney voting
nay.
CLAIMS PAID.
amount of $61,000.00 from Grandview Associates for the Grandview Area Service Road
(BA-117).
whereby the money would be refunded to the Village in the event that the property
should not be used for road purposes at some future date. Trustee VanValkenburg's
motion for approving the remainder of the claims as per Pre-List was then seconded
-by Trustee Johnson and carried.
Following some dis-
Trustee VanValkenburg's motion for approval
Trustee VanValkenburg questioned the purchase of an "easement" in the
He recommended that before the check be released, an agreement be executed
The agenda's business having been covered, Trustee Johnson's motion for adjournment
was seconded by Trustee Courtney and carried. Adjournment at 5:50 p.m.
..
c