Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19680617_regularMea.,ers answering rc and Mayor Bredesen. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON MONDAY, JUNE 17, 1968 lcall were Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, Shaw, VanVi-..enburg, MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of June 3, 1968, were approved as submitted by motion of Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman- VanValkenburg and carried. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO THE REVEREND BERNARD W. KUMMEL. Being advised by Mr. Hyde that the Reverend Bernard 11. Hummel, Rector of St.* S,te_phen's Eposcopal Church, is retiring, Councilman VanValkenburg offered the follo,wi,n& resolution and. moved its adoption : RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATI'ON a TO THE REVEREND BERNARD W. HUMMEL I WHEREAS, the Reverend Bernard W. Hummel has serv"e4 a-s Rector of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church since 1942, and -AS, under his leadership, St. Stephen's Episcopal Church has continued to grow as evidenced by the construction of numerous additions to the church edifice, and WHEREAS, Mr. Hummel has endeared himself to members of his congregation and to all of the community who were aware of his selfless endeavors in the religious as well as the civic affairs of the community, NOW, TEEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the deep respect and affection of the Edina Vil- lage Council and the community as a whole be extended to THE REVEREND BERNARD W. HUMMEL, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that sincere appreci upon his retirement on September 1, 1968. Motion. for adoption was seconded by Council 11 best wishes accompany him ATTEST : Mayor Village Clerk : $L 8. 7!!uAQ4/ - .- .- PUBLIC HEBRINGS CONDUCTED ON VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Publication in the Edina Sun on June 6. and 13, and of Mailing on June 7, 1968, were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. lic hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter recorded, A. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: I Pursuant to due notice given, pub- Walnut Drive from West 59th Street to Vernon Avenue Vernon Avenue from Walnut Drive to Tamarac Avenue Walnut Drive fromvernon Avenue to West 59th Street B. CONSTRUCTION OF PERKANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN Since the above improvements are proposed to be assessed against substantially the same properties, the hearings were conducted simultaneously. Stating that petitions had been received, Mr. Hyde presented total estimated project cost for the above mentioned watermain at $18,978.65, proposed to be assessed against 23 estimated ass- essable lots at an estimated cost of $825.16 per assessable lot. the Walnut Drive street surfacing was estimated by MI. Hyde at $26,401.91, proposed to be assessed on either 25 estimated assessable lots or against 2,270.30 assessable.. feet. Estimated cost was given at $11.63 per assessable foot or $1,056.08 per ass- essable lot. No persons were present to protest the improvements and none had been received prior thereto. by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. in Minutes.) Project cost of Councilman Courtney' s motion for approval was then seconded (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later c. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Beard Avenue from West 57th Street to West 58th Street West 58th Street from Beard Avenue to alley between Abbott Ave. and Beard Ave. Alley between Abbott Ave. and Beard Ave. from West 58th Street south 164 feet Alley between West 58th Street and West 59th Street between Zenith Ave. and York I Ave . Mr. Hyde presented total estimated project cost at $23,969.23, prpposed to be assessed against 1,477.798 estimated assessable square feet at an estimated cost of $0.017 per square foot. Mr. Hite advised that the storm sewer is an extension of an exist- ing storm sewer and indicated the area proposed to be benefitted with the aid of the viewgraph. heavy rain in areas which are adequately served with storm sewers. lett, 5809 Beard Avenue South, advised that the alley behind his home had to be pumped during every hard rainstorm. a danger to automobile traffic and to children playing in the alley, that the running water causes soil erosion, and that a few weeks ago an affidavit was filed with the Village stating that the Village would be held liable for the conditions existing in Mayor Bredesen noted that there had been no problems during a recent Mr, Thomas TJil- He charged that the flooded alley constitutes F 6/17/68 L the alley during a heavy rain. Mr. Willett further pointed out that since the spring of 1957 he had rented and maintained a pump to keep the water at as low a level as possible. the assessment area who desire that the storm sewer be approved as proposed with- out further delay. Mr. Thomas Luce, 5817 Zenith Avenue, also spoke in favor of the proposed storm sewer. Messrs. Kenneth Peterson, 5716 Abbott Avenue, Clinton Deni- son, 5600 Abbott Avenue and R. C. Morrison, 5720 Abbott Avenue, all spoke in oppo- sition to the manner by which the storm sewer is-proposed to be assessed. They were advised by Council that this hearing is only for the purpose of determining the need of the project and that the method of assessment would be determined at the assessment hearing. In reply to a question of Mr. Lloyd A, Johnson, 5624 Abbott Avenue, Mr. Hite advised that the proposed system would be adequate for all but the exceptionally heavy "ten or twenty year" storm. Mrs. E.*F. Brzeneski, 5840 Abbott Avenue, suggested that the storm se.wer to be constructed in the alley between Abbott and Zenith North of West 59th Street be continued to West 60th Street. It t7as suggested that in correcting the alley problem that another prob- lem is being created. cil to authorize a more extensive storm sewer since the cost would be prohibitive in relation to the additional benefit gained. Councilman Johnson suggested the possibility that payments already made for the previously installed storm sewer might be taken into account when the proposed storm sewer is actually assessed. No further comments being heard, Councilman Courtney's motion approving construc- tion of the storm sewer as proposed was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. D. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Mr. Willett advised that he represents property owners in Mr. Hite advised that he could not justify requesting Coun- (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) West 52nd Street from Minnehaha Creek to Halifax Avenue Halifax Avenue from West 52nd Street to West 50th Street On an easement line from approximately West 51st Street and Halifax Ave. to France Ave. France Ave. from midway between l?est 50th Street and West 51st Street to West 49% Street TJest 49% Street from France Ave. to midway between France Avenue and Halifax Avenue THE FOLLOWING: Improvement on Halifax 'Avenue bitween its intersection with Rest 50th Street E. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANANT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN and a point approximat'ely ' 300 feet Southerly thereof; thence Sou.theasterly to the intersection of France Avenue and West 51st Street Items D and E above being related, hearings were conducted concurrently on the sewer at $125,342.42, proposed to be assessed against an estimated 755,299 assess- able feet at an estimated cost of $0.1475 per assessable square foot. pointed out that it is proposed to pay $13,810.88 of this amount from Municipal State Aid Funds. Estimated total project cost of the street improvement listed under E above was given at $176,076.65. finance the development of this South Perimeter Road primarily from the Village's Municipal State Aid Street.Improvement Fund plus some assessments against proper- ties abutting the new road between Halifax and France Avenues. The estimated rate of assessment is not anticipated to exceed $25.00 per foot of property frontage along the proposed new street. Mr. Fremont Fletcher, representing 0. D. Hauschild, Inc., inquired what basis was used for determining the proposed storm sewer assess- use was considered and that some residential properties which have already been assessed for storm sewer have been excluded from the assessment district. Fletcher stated that the Hauschild property does not contriubute any water to the proposed storm sewer. Mr. Fletcher further protested that the Hauschild Company loses access to France Avenue on the north side of their building and that they are not benefited by any of the area improvements. Mr. Hite replied that the matter of access has not been determined as yet because details have not been worked out. Mr. Warren Weck, representing business properties in the 50th and France Avenue area, was advised by Mr. Hite that adequate parking facilities were planned to serve the area. Mrs. W. H. Hauck, 5029 Indianola Avenue, was advised by Mr. Hite that only properties east of Halifax Avenue and north of West 51st Street are proposed to be assessed for these improvements. heard, Councilman Johnson offered the following resolution for approval of the above improvements and moved its adoption: . two proposed improvements. Mr. Hyde presented estimated project cost for the storm I Mr. Hyde Mr. Hyde advised that it is proposed to . ment area. He waa advised by Mr. Hite that a combination of topography and land Mr. No further discussion being RESOLUTION APPROVING WATERMAIN 232, STREET IMPROVEMENTS BA-130 AND BA-131 AND STORM SEWERS 114 AND 115 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed im- provements: r 6/17/68 1 1. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES .IN THE FOLLOWING: Walnut Drive from West 59th Street to Vernon Avenue Vernon Avenue from Walnut Drive to Tamarac Avenue . Walnut Drive from Vernon Avenue to West! 59th Street 5, CONSTRUCTIQN OF STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN .THE FOLLOWING: Beard Avenue from West 57th Street to West 58th Street TJest 58th Street from Beard Avenue to alley between Abbott Ave. and Beard Ave. Alley between Abbott Ave. and Beard Ave. from West 58th Street south 164 feet Alley between West 58th Street and West 59th Street between Zenith Ave. and 2. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING ANI, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN - - Pork Ave, 4. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: II Westr 52nd Street from Minnehaha Creek to Halifax Avenue Halifax Avenue from West 52nd Street to West 50th Street On an easement line from approximately West 51st Street and Halifax Ave. to France Ave, from midway between West 50th Street.and West 51st Street to West 4935 Street from France Ave.,to midway between France Avenue and Halifax France Ave. West 4935 Street Avenue - - 5. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING : ' Improvement on Halifax Avenue between its intersection with West 50th Street and a point approximately 300 feet Southerly thereof; thence Southeasterly to the intersection of France Avenue and West 51st Street. and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in the notice the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improve- ments including all proceedings which may be necessary in emhent domain for the ac- quisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvements; that said improvements are hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: No. 1 Above WATERMAIN NO. 232 No. 2 Above STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-131 No, 3 Above STORM SEWER NO. 115 No, 4 Above STORM SEWER NO. 114 No, 5 Above STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-130 and the areas to be specially assessed for Watermain 232 includes Lots 1 thru 13 including Walnut Ridge Addition; Lots 2 thru 6 incl., Block 2 and Lots 8 thru 12 incl., Block 3, WalnutARidge First Addition; the area proposed to be assessed for BA-131 includes Lots 1 thru 13 incl., Walnut Ridge Addition, Lots. 1 thru 7 incl., Block 2, -and Lots 8 thru 12 incl. Block 3, Walnut Ridge First Addition; the area proposed to be assessed for Storm Sewer ,115 includes all lots and tracts of land within the following described boundaries: Commencing at a point in the center line of West 58th Street said point being 100' West of the center line of Beard Ave.; thence Nest along the center line of West 58th Street to a point 20' West of the West line of Chowen Ave.; thence North to the North line of Vest 58th Street; thence Northwesterly to a point in the North line of Lot 7, Block 4, Abercrombie's Addition, said point being 40' West of the Northeast corner of said Lot 7; thence Northwesterly to a point on the South'Line of Lot 2, Block 2, Gouldsmith's Addition, said point being 70' West of the South- east corner of said Lot 2; thence Northwesterly to,a point on the North line of Lot 11, Block 2, Brookline Addition, said point being 30' East of the Northwest corner of said Lot 11; thence Northerly to a point in Lot 4, Block 2, Brookline 2nd Addition, said point being 45' North of the South line and 27' West of the East line of said Lot 4; thence Easterly to a point in the East line of Lot 3, Brookline 2nd Addition, said point being 45' North of the South line of said Lot 3; thence .Northeasterly to a point in the North line of Lot 2, Block 2, Brookline 2nd Add- ition,'said point being 50' East of the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence Northeasterly to a point in the South line of Lot 12, Block 2, Edina Hills Brook- line Addition, said point being 50' West of the Southeast corner of said Lot 12; thence Northerly and Northeasterly 50' West of and paralle1.to.the West line of Chowen Ave. to the East line of Lot 6, Block 2, Edina Hills Brookline Addition; thence Southesterly along the East line of Lot 6, Block 2, Edina Hills Brookline Addition to the center line of Chowen Avenue; thence Easterly along the center line of Chowen Ave. to the center line of Beard Avenue; thence Northerly along the center line of Beard Avenue a distance of 75'; thence Easterly to a point on the East line of Lot 10, Block 4, White Investment Company's Hidden Valley Addition, sa5d point being 45' North of the Southeast corner of said Lot 10; thence North to the Northeast corner of said Lot 10; thence Easterly to a point on the North line of-Lot 13, Block 4, White Investment Company's Hidden Valley Addition, said point . - 6/17/68 being 10' West of the Northeast corner of point on the East line of said Lot13, sa east corner thereof; thence Easterly to a said Lot 13; thence Southesterly to a d PO nt being 40' North of the South- point on the East line of Lot 14, Block 4., White Investment Company's Hidden Valley Addition, said point being 50' North of the Southeast corner thereof; thence Southeasterly to a point on the East line of Lot 15, Block 4, White Investment Company's Hidden Valley Addition, said point being 20' North of the Southeast corner thereof; thence Easterly to a point in Lot 16, Block 4, White Investment Company's Hidden Valley Addition, said point being 40' East of the West line and 20' North of the South line of said Lot 16' thence Southerly to a point on the North line of Lot 12, Block 3, Harriet Lawn Addition, said point being 98' East of the Northwest Corner of said Lot 12; thence Southwesterly to the South line of said Lot 12, said point being 60' East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 12; thence Southerly to a point in the South line of. Lot 10, Block 3, said point being 60' East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 10; thence Southeasterly to a point which is on the Easterly extension of the South line of Lot 9, Block 3, 7' East of the Southeast corner of said Lot 9; thence Southerly along the center line of vacated alley to the 'Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 3, Block 5, Brookline Addition; thence Southeasterly to a point in said Lot 3, said point being 40' East of the West line and 30' South of the North line; thence Easterly to a point in said Lot 3, said point being 30' South of the North line and 120' East of the West line; thence Southerly along the West line of Zenith Avenue to the Northeast corner of Lot 10, Block 6, Brookline Add- ition; thence Easterly along the North line of Lots 12 and 11, Block 3, Brookline Addition to a point in Lot 11, said point being 70' East of the Northwest corner thereof; thence Southerly to a point in the North line of Lot 1, Block 2, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition, said point being 65' East of the Northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence Southeasterly to a point in the South line of said Lot 1, said point being 90' East of the Southwest corner thereof; theme Southerly to a point in the South line of Lot 2, Block 2, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition, said point being 90' East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence Southwesterly to a point in the South line of Lot 4, Block 2, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition, said point being 50' East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence Southeasterly to a point in the South line of Lot 5, Block 2, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition, said point being 90' East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence Southwesterly to a point in the South line of Lot 9, Block 2, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition, said point being 50' East of the Southwest corner thereof; thence Westerly along the North lines of Lots 10 and 15, Block 2, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition to a point in the North line of Lot 15, said point being 80' West of the Northeast corner of said Lot 15; thence North to a point in the North line of Lot 16, Block 2, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition, said point being 80' West of the Northeast cbrner of said Lot 16; thence West to a point in the North line of Lot 9, Block 3, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition, said point being 20' West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence Southwesterly to a point in the center line of Abbott Avenue, said point being on the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 12, Block 4, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition; thence Southerly along the center line of Abbott Avenue to the center line of West 59th Street; thence Southwesterly to a point on the North line of Lot 1, Block 5, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition, said point being 60' West of theNortheast corner thereof; thence Southerly to a point in the South line of Lot 7, Block 5, Harriet Manor 2nd Add- ition, said point bei-ng 60' West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence Westerly to the Southwest corner of said Lot 7; thence South along the West line of Lots 8 and 9, Block 5, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition and its Southerly extension to the North line of Lot 12, Block 5, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition; thence Westerly along the North line of Lots 12, 13 and 14, Block 5, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition and its Westerly extension to the center line of Beard Avenue; thence Southwesterly to a point on-the West line of Beard Avenue, said point being 117.5' North of the North line of West 60th Street; thence Westerly 117.5' North of and parallel to the North line of West 60th Street a distance of 45'; thence Northwesterly to a point 70' West of the West line of Beard Avenue and 174' North of the North line of West 60th Street; thence North to point of beginning. The area proposed to be assessed for Storm Sewer No. 114 includes all lots and tracts of land within the following described boundaries: Commencing at the Northeast ,corner of Lot 20, Aud. Sub. 8172; thence West to the Northwest cprner. of Lot 31, Aud. Sub. #172; thence South along the West line of said Lot 31 a distance of 137.5'; thence West 137.5' South of and parallel to the North line of said Lot 32 to the West line of said Lot 32; thence North to the SQutheast corner of Lost 1, Block. 1, Allata's First Addition; thence West along the South line of Block 1, Allata's First Addition to the Southwest corner of Lot 3; thence South along the East line of Lot 1, Block 1, V. H. Adams Addition to the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence West along the South line of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, V. H. Adams Addition to the Southwest corner of Lot 2; thence North along 1 r 1 6/17/68 the Vest line of said Lot 2, to the Northeast corner of Lot 1, Block I, Replat of Lot-6, Block 1, Lund Kruse Addition; thence West along the North line of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Replat of Lot 6, Block 1, Lund Kruse Addition to, the Northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence South along the East line of Lot 5, Block 1, Lund Kruse Add- ition and its Southerly extension to the North line of West 50th Street; thence East along the North line of West 50th Street to the intersection of the East line of Halifax Avenue South of West 50th Street extended North; thence South along the East line of Halifax Avenue to the Southwest corner of Lot 54, Aud, Sub. #172; thence East along the South lines of Lots'54, 55 and 49 Aud. Sub. a172 to the Southeast corner of Lot 49, Aud. Sub, #172; thence North to point of beginning. The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of Street Improvement BA-130 includes Lots 41, 42, 49, 51, 53, 54, 55, and East 143 feet of the North 72 feet of Lot 56, all in Auditors Subdivision No. 172. Motion for adoption of the resolution was and on rollcall there were five ayes and ATTEST: Hayor IYETRO U.S. REQUEST FOR PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ZONING NORTH OF INTERCHANGE CENTERAPPROVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hoisington presented the petition of Metro U. S. for the rezoning of a 50 to 60 acre parcel located on the south side of West 70th Street and west of Nine Mile Creek from R-1 Residential to Planned Industrial and Office Building Districts. approval provided the following conditions were agreed upon by Mr. Bernardi and the property owners : 1. 2. 3. No accessory uses (loading docks) facing residential areas. 4. No trackage into area. 5. 6. Mr, Hoisington noted that the Planning Commission No traffic entrances to or exits from West 70th Street--all access to be from the south. G Buildings on the northerly end of the property (West 70th Street) are to have "bestt1 side face on West 70th Street single family areas. Landscaping along south side of West 70th Street Approach Northern States Power Company to see if some of their heavier truck traffic would use Mr. Bernardi's proposed road system rather than West 70th Street. Mr.. Fred Johnson advised that he is the owner of 15 acres of land in the area and currently has a 300 unit apartment complex before the Planning Commission and stated that he would request that his land be considered also in any zoning action taken at this time. Mr. Hyde noted that the basic problem at the present time is sewer capacity and that this problem should be resolved within twelve months. Mr. Hite pointed out that industrial zoning has been recommended as a consistent land use for this area since 1963, advised that present sanitary sewer facilities are adequate to serve the proposed industrial area. Mr. D..L. Ferguson, 5157 Abercrombie Drive, was advised by Mr. Hite that a 50 foot landscaped strip will be installed by the developer to screen the area, In reply to a complaint of the volume of traffic on Bush Lake Road and West 70th Street, Mr. Hite advised that thru traffic will befdiscouraged, of property at 5020 West 70th Street: was advised that the plants proposed to be constructed in the area will back on West 70th Street and that the pitch of the roofs will not be objectionable to suvrounding property owners. 5169 Abercrombie Drive, was advised that if a three story building were constructed in the area in question, only one and one-half stories would be visible from residences on the south side of West 70th Street, that he represents a client who owns property west of the Edina Evangelical Church and asked if there would be any maintenance, screening or protection along the creek. He further asked for some indication as to whether the land could be re- zoned.to R-3 to assure his client of ithis zoning. has been zoned, the Village would have to issue a -building permit. Mr. Hoisington pointed out that a request has already been received by the Planning Commission for R-3 zoning for the property east of the creek but that no site plans have been received as yet. In reply to a complaint from Mr, Donald L. Stewart, 5161 Aber- crombie Drive, Mr, Hite explained the burning 0rdinances;of the Village and advised that complaints on air pollution as well as on glare should be submitted to Village authorities. No further comments being heard, Councilman Shaw offered the follow- ing ordinance for First Reading with waiver of Second Reading, subject *to the pro- visions stated above, as recommended by Planning Commission and moved its adoption: (See correction July 1) In reply to a question of Mr. Courtney, Mr. Hite The omer Mr. Ted Miller, Mr, Fremont Fletcher advised Mr. Hyde said that once property 6/17/68 L ORDINANCE N0.,261-163 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE ADDITIONAL PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS AND OF ,TF2YI&LAGE OF EDINA BY ESTABLISHING I) ., 0 i AN OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. ' Paragraph 2, I1Boundaries of Planned Industrial Diskrict" of. Section 10 (Planned Industrial District) of Ordinance 261 of revised! ordinances of the Village of Edina, as amended is hereby further amended by add'ng after subparagraph (u) of said paragraph 2, the following subparagraph : That part of Government Lot 1, Section 9, Township 116, kange 21, lying south of West 70th Street and west of Nine mile Creek" P "(w) Parcel 4000, Section 9, Township 116, Range 21." I "(v) Section 2. Paragraph 2, "Boundaries of Office Building District" of Section 8, (Office Building District) of Ordinance 261 of revised orhinances of the Village of Edina, as amended is hereby further amended by addbng the following< subparagraph: "(2) Sect5on 3. ~ Parcel 3515, Section 9, Township 116, Range 21." This ordinance shall be in full force and effect ihediately. after its passage and publication-according to law. I Motion for adoption of Ordinance NO. 261-163 was seconded by Councilinan Courtney and on rollcall there were four ayes with Councilman Johnson voting %ay" be- cause there is no buffer between the 'Plann-ndustrial District and the Single @&+ Family Residential District to the 'n .. .. ATTEST : Mayor I #- d. Village Clerk LOTS 11 AND 12, MENDELSSOHN ADDITION NORTH-SOUTH LOT DIVISION DENIED. ~r. Hoisi'ngton recalled to Council that the request of Mr. R. G. Stire for the north-south division of Lots 11 and 12, Block 12, Mendelssohn Addition had been continued from Council Meetings of March 6, May 6, and June 3, 1968. Mr. Montgomery, attorney representing ,Mr.- Stire, indicated that he h d met with Dr. Lyon and Mr. O'Connor who are willing to make a conveyance of land to serve as a driveway to John Street, of Edina Realty feel that these lots would be unsalable if the requested division were not approved. He pointed out that the width of the divided lots would be 73-% feet which would be Gonsistent with the 75 foot lots on adjacent Belmore Lane, that the north-south division had been recommended by the Planning Com- mission and Board of Appeals and that the division is consistent with zoning practices. lots as a package and that he has had-an offer from a builder who wants to construct two $25,000 houses on the lots if the division is approved. Mr. J_ames Daniels, attorney for Dr. Ford, advised that he thought that tp matter had been tabled with the provision that a meeting would be held between in- terested parties. Mrs. Leonard Parnell, 314 John Street, advised that the sanitary sewer had made this property salable and pleaded that a more sub- stantial house on the property would upgrade the neighborhood, rather than the construction of two l'ess expensive dwellings. Blake Road, and Mr. Clifford Olson, 6220 Belmore Lane, also spoke in opposition to the lot division. a money or square foot* rest*riction be placed on the dwellings which would be constructed on the property. the lot size had reduced the value of homes in this area. C,ouncilman Johnson noted that since all of the lots north of Maloney Avenue have .frontages of at least 100 feet, he does not think that the division should be approved, Mr. Hite pointed out that unless access is obtained, there is only one buildable lot but noted that neighbors have been most cooperative in offering to convey the property to provide access to Lot 11. Mayor Bredesen noted that Council should either deny the north-south division or accept the 0ffe.r of the 20 foot access to Lot 11. Councilman Johnson's motion that the lot division be denied died for lack of a second. south division of the lot as recommended by Planning Commission but @ confirm the status quo and permit construction of dwellings on each lot, proyided that the existing Lot 11 be given access from John Street of at least 20 feet by conveyance of a Fee Title free and clear of all mortages or any kncumberances. Motion W~S seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. Councilman VanValken- burg cast a "Nay" vote, stating that he believes that the Planning CQmmission recommendation is proper and should be followed. a However, Mr. Stire and Mr. Wbgner . .. Mr. Montgomery.advised that Mr. Stire is trying to sell the two I - Dr. William H. Fotd, 401 A suggestion was made by a gentleman in the audience that Mr. Hite advised that a similar circumstance had - existed in Kresse Addition and that there has been no indication that lessening Councilman Shaw then moved to deny the north- 6/17 /68 BIDS AWARDED FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT BAc125.. Mr. Hyde presented tabulation of bids taken-June 14 at 11:OO a.m. in response to Advertisement for Bids in the Edina-Sun on 3,--1968, and- in Zhe' Conktruction Bullgti-n -013 23 and 39 and June--6, - __ 1968, - _- - __ ation showed Matt Bullock "Contracting Go., Inc. and Don Anderson Excavating, ,Inc,;-lbw:b%dders at $81,193.40, Black Top Service Company second low bidder at $84,77830; Bury and Carlson, Inc., third low bidder at $85,714.50 and J. V, Gleason Go., Inc., high bidder at $105,405.00 as against Engineer's estimate of $101,391.50. Councilman Johnson's motion approving award to Matt Bullock Contracting Go., Inc., and Don Xnderson Excavating, Inc., recornended low bidder, was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. BIDS AWARDED FOR VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS. Mr. Hyde presented tabulation of bids for Sanitary Sewers 268, 265, 269, 272 and 271, Watermains 227, 226, 231 and 230, and for Storm Sewers 113 and West 58th Street which were received in-response to Adver- tisement for Bids in the Edina Sun on May 23 and in the Construction Bulletin on May 23 and 30 and June 6, 1968. Tabulation for Proposal A (S.S.jI268) showed Orfei & Sons, Inc., low bidders at $10,818.25, Northern Contracting Co., second low bid- ders at $10,940.50, Nodland Associates, Inc,, third low bidders at $11,895.00 and G. L. Contracting, Inc., high bidder at $14,742.50. Engineer's dstimate was presented at $8,233.50. Tabulation for 'Proposal B (S.S.#265 and W.M.#227) showed Suburban Sewer &Water, Inc., low bidder at $16,000.00, G. L. Contracting, Inc., second low bidder at $16,392.50, Phelps-Drake Co . , Inc. , third low bidder at $16,804.85 and Walbon Excavating Co., high bidder at $20,520.00, as against Engineer's estimate of $20,166 -50. Tabulation for Proposal: C (S .S .$I269 and W .M.#226) showed Phelps- Drake Go., Inc., low bidder at $20,919.05, Suburban Sewer & Water, Inc,, second low bidder at $21,000.00, Peter Lametti Construction Company third low bidder at $21,832.45 and Walbon Excavating Company high bidder at $26,204.00 as against Engineer's estimate of $21,345.00. Sewer &Water, Inc., low bidder at $23,000.00, G. L. Contracting, Inc., second low bidder at $23,395.10, Peter Lametti Construction Co. third low bidder at $24,220.10 and Nodland Associates, Inc., high bidder at $29,956.80. presented at- $29,500.00. and ST.S.fIll3) showed Suburban Sewer &Water, Inc., low bidder at $99,500.00, Nod- land Associates, Inc,, second low bidder at $111,262.80, Orfei & Sons, Inc.-, third low bidder at $111,314.67 and Walbon Excavating Go. high bidder at $131,525.90 against Engineer's estimate of $115,000;00. Tabulation of Bids for Proposal F (I?. 58th Street Storm Sewer) showed G. L. Contracting, Inc., low bidder a% $2,780.30, Orfei & Sons, Xnc., second low bidder at $3,024.00, Nodland Associates, Inc,, third low bidder at $3,386.00 and Suburban Sewer &Water, Inc., high bidder at $6,000.00. Engineer's estimate was presented at $3,690.00. Councilman VanValkenburg's motion for award to recommended low bidder in all cases except for Proposal F was seconded by Cbuncilman Johnson and carried. by motion of Councilman VanValkenburg, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried, STREET IMPROVENENT BA-129 BID AWARDED. Mr. Hyde presented tabulation of bids taken in response-to Advertisement for Bids published in the Edina Sun on May 29, and in the Construction Bulletin on May 30 and June 6, 1968, for Street Improvement BA-229. Tabulation showed Black Top Service Company low bidder at $40,845.00, Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc., second low bidder at $44,784.00, Crown Sidewalk Co., Inc. third low bidder-at $46,838.00 against Engineer's estimate of $44,730.00. kenburg's motion for award to Black Top Service Company, recommended low bidder, was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. to remain at 24 feet in width. WOODDALE AVENUE WATER SERVICE REPLACEMENT BID AWARDED. of two bids taken in response to Advertisement for Bids in the Edina Sun on May 29 and in the Construction Bulletin on May 30 and June 6, 1968. eapolis Water and Sewer Repair, Inc. low bidder at $4,485.00 and United Sewer and Water Service, Inc., high bidder at $54,922.53 as against Engineer's estimate of $3,595.00,- Councilman VanValkenburg's motion for award to recommended low bidder, Eiinneapolis Water & Sewer Repair, Inc., was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. PETITIONS RECEIVED. Upon motion of Councilman VanValkenburg, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried, the following petitions were accepted and-referred to the Engineering Department for processing: 1. 2. 3. Watermain - Vandervork Avenue north of Division Street 4. 5. -Street Surfacing and Oiling - Virginia Avenue between Vest 62nd Street and the Tabulation for Proposal D (S.S.fI272 and TJ.M.$!231) showed Suburban Engineer's estimate was Tabulation 6f bids for Proposal E ( S.S.2271, W.M.#230 I Award of bid for Proposal F was ordered held Councilman VanVal- It was noted that Wooddale Avenue is Mr. Hyde presented tabulation Tabulation showed Minn- I Oiling - Dale Avenue between West 56th Street and West 57th Street Oiling - West 62nd Street between Tracy Avenue and Olinger Blvd. Extended Sanitary Sewer - Vandervork Avenue north of Division Street Crosstown Highway 6/17/68 LOT 45, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION 172 DIVISION APPROVED. the request of R. W. Steiner for division of Lot 45, Auditor's' Subdivision 172, Mr. Hoisington presented advising that this division has been approved by Planning Commission and that no protests have been received. following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Richard W. Steiner, Trustee of the Sadie M. SteinepTrust, is the owner of a certain parcel of land in the Village of Edina described as follows: Councilman VanValkenburg thereupon offered the That part of Lot 45, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 described as follows: of the South line thereof, thence West along a line parallel to said South line a distance of 150.0 feet; thence North along a thence East along a line parallel to said South line a distance of 36.1 feet; thence North along a line paraLlel to said East line a distance of 1.1 feet; thence East along a line parallel to said South line a distance of 113.0 feet to a point in said East line 123.0 feet North of the point of beginning; thence South along said East line a distance ,of 123.0 feet to the point of beginning, reserving a party of the first part, its successors and assigns, a driveway easement over and through the above described tract of land for pur- poses of ingress to and egress from the land lying adjacent thereto on the West, which easement shall run from East to West and from 'Nest to East, approximately eighteen (18) feet in width along and parallel.to both the North and South sides of the building to be of the first part, its successors and assigns, for the lesser of (a) the extension Westward of 51st Street and the development of the aforesaid adjacent land as a municipal parking facility, whichever is shorter; provided, that if the lease of party of the second part with Twin City Red Barn, Inc., 86, a Minnesota corporation, dated ment shall, at the option of party of the second part, terminate contemporaneously with the termination of said lease; and - Commencing at a point on the East line of said Lot 45, 70 feet North line parallel to said East line a distance of 121.9 feet; - , , . rn P- c - constructed thereon, and which easement shall be reserved to party u - ten (10) years from the date hereof, or (b) the completion date of u - December 12, 1967, be terminated prior thereto, the aforesaid ease- WHEREAS, said owner has requested approval of the Village of Edina of the conveyance and ownership of the above described land as a separate parce; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning .Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tract of land as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements and provis- ions of Ordinance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and conveyance, subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of the above described tracts of land unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the Village of Edina or with theprior approval of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution wa on rollcall there were five ayes and ATTEST : lkbd4-L d.. zlL-u&U Village Clerk LOT 35, ROLLING GREEN DIVISION &PROVED. of Mr. R. H. Mortensen for division of Lot 35, Rolling Green, advising that this division has been approved by Planning Commission and that no protests have been received. lution and moved its adoption: WEREAS, Richard H. Mortensen and Dee Ann Mortensen, husband and wife, are the owners of a certain parcel of land in the Village of Edina described as follows: Lot 35 except that part of Lot 35 lying Northerly of a straight line running from the Northeast corner of Lot 35 to a point on the Westerly line from the Northwest corner of said Lot 35, "Rolling Green, Hennepin County, Minn.," according to the recorded plat thereof; and Mr. Hoisington presented the request Councilman VanValkenburg then offered the following reso- - RESOLUTION - line of said Lot 35 distant,26 feet Southwesterly along the Westerly 6/17/68 ItmREb, said owners have requested approval of the Village of Edina of the con- veyance and ownership of the above described land as a separ,ate_parcel; and IZHEREAS, it:has- been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and zoning Regulation of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A, NOU, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tract of land as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ord- inance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and conveyance, subject, however, to the provision that. no further subdivision be made of the above described tract of land unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordin- ances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances. I Motion for adoption of the resolution was rollcall there were five ayes and no nays ATTEST : Mayor LOT 6, BLOCK 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 13TH ADDITION DIVISION APPROVED, presented request of Mr. R. E. Scott for the division of Lot 6, Block 1, Park- Mr. Hoisington wood Knolls 13th Addition, advising that this division has been approved by Planning Commission and that no protqsts have been received. kenburg then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, Ray E. Scott and Edith Scott, husband and wife, are the owners of a certain parces of land in the Village of Edina described as follows: Councilman VanVal- RESOLUTION Lot- Six (6), except that part lying Southerly of a Line drawn from the South- west corner of said lot to a point in the Easterly line of said lot distant 50 feet Northerly of the most Southerly corner thereof, Block One (l), Parkwood Knolls 13th Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County, Subject to restrictions and easements of record, if any, and I TJHEREAS, said owners have requested approval of the Village of Edina of the con- veyance and ownership of the above described land as a separate parcel; and IJHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an-unnecessary hardship and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tract of land as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ord- inance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and conveyance, subject, however, to the.provision that no further subdivision be made of the above described tract of land unless made in compliance with the pertinent ord- inances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was se rollcall there were five ayes and no nays an ATTEST: - A& fk, ./ Village Clerk .-. LOT 15, BLOCK 10, NORMANDALE I1 DIVISION APPROVED. quest of Mr, H. L. Joern for the division of Lot 15, Block 10, Normandale 11 as recommended by Planning Commission and advised that no objections had been re- ceived. its adoption: Mr. Hoisington presented re- Councilman VanValkenburg then offered the following resolution and moved RE SOLUTION 1,JHEREAS. Herman L. Joern and Arlene J. Joern. husband and wife. are the owners of a certain parcel of land in the Village of Edina described is follows: The North half of Lot 15 and all of Lot 16, Block 10, Normandale Second Add- ition, according to the duly recorded plat thereof; and 6/17/68. t MHEREAS, said owners have requested approval of the Village of Edina of the conveyance and ownership of the above described land as a separate parcel; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hard- ship and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A; NO14 THEREFORE, Be it resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tract of land as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements and-provisions of Ordinance No.s 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and con- veyance, subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of the above described tract of land unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances, Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney - and on rollcall there were five ayes and no&s and the resolution was adop ted. ATTEST : LLGA&?@d4 Mayor dL 49. k, Village Clerk LOT 27, BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK I1 LOT DIVISION APPROVED. Mr. Hoisington presented request for the division of Lot 27, Block 2, South Harriet Park I1 as recommended by Planning Commission and advised that no objections had been received. and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, Charles R. Thiss, fee owner and Thomas Thiss, contract buyer, are the'ovmers of a certain parcel of land in the Village of Edina described as follows : WHEREAS, said owners have requgsted approval of the Village of Edina of the conveyance and ownership of the above describedhnd as separate parcels des- cribed as follows: Councilman VanValkenburg then offered the following resolution RESOLUTION Lot 27, Block 2, South Harriet Park 2nd Addition; and That part of Lot 27 lying North of a line parallel to and 30 feet South of the North line of said'lot 27, Block 2, South Harriet Park 2nd Add- * ition, according to the plat thereof on file in the office of the Henn- epin County Register of Deeds; and All of Lot 27, Block 2, South Harriet Park 2nd Addition, except that part lying North of a line parallel to and 30 feet South of the North line of said Lot 27, all according to the recorded plat thereof on file in the office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliancekth the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hard- ship and said tracts of land as separate parcels does not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A; NOW, TEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate parcels are hereby approved and the requirements and pro- visions of Ordinance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and conveyance, subiject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision can be made of the above described tracts of land unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval 'of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was on rollcall there were five ayes and no n ATTEST : Village Clerk LOTS 4, 5 AND 6, BLOCK 1, REPLAT OF LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK 1, PEACEDALE ACRES DIVI- SION APPROVED. 6, Block 1, Replat of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Peacedale Acres in order to form three 75 foot lots. Planning Commission has recommended approval, Councilman VanValkenburg offered the following resolution and moveif its adoption: Mf. Hoisington presented request for division of Lots 4, 5 and No objections have been received and upon being advised that 1264' j 6/17/68 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, approval of the Village of Edina has been requested to the conveyance and ownership of Lots Four (4), Five (5) and Six (6), Block One (l), Replat of Lots 5 and-6, Block 1, Peacedale Acres, as three separate parcels, described as follows: Lot Six (6), said Block One (l), and the North 1.5 feet, front and rear of Lot 5, Block 1; Lot Five (5), except the North 1.5 feet, front and rear, said Block One (l), Atia ThE North three (3) feet of Lot Four (4), front and rear, said Block I; Lot Four (4) except the North three (3) feet, front and rear, said Block 1; and .. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said tracts of land as separate parcels do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate parcels is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and oonveyance, sqbject, however, to 1 the provision that no further subdivision be made of the above described tracts of land unless ma&e in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was rollcall there were five ayes and no nays ATTFST: Mayor dL !& Village Clerk V WILLIAM F. SHARPE ZONING CHANGE HEARING DATE SET. Johnson, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried, July 1, 1968, was set for hearing date for the request of blilliam F. Sharpe for R-2 Multiple Residence District zoning on Benton Avenue West of the railroad tracks. H. M. SCHOENING ZONING CHANGE HEARING DATE SET. so6, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried, July 1, 1968, was set for hearing date for the petition of H. M. Schoening for R-2 Multiple Residential District zoning for property located at 5700 Blake Road. Upon motion of Councilman Upon motion of Councilman John- LA BUENA VISTA--'NILSON REPLAT PRELIMINARY APPROVAL HEARING DATE SET FOR JULY 1, 1968, by motion of Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. PORTION OF VALLEY VIEW ROAD STREET VACATION HEARING DATE SET for August 5, 1968, by motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. PORTION OF SPRUCE ROAD VACATION HEARING DATE SET by motion of Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Shaw and-carried. PORTION OF SHERWOOD AVENUE VACATION HEARING DATE SET for July 15, 1968, by motion of CounCilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT AEIENDNENTS SET FOR AUGUST 5, 1968. 3k. 36isington that the ordinance amending Office Building District Ordinance is ready for consideration, Councilman Johnson's motion setting hearing date for August 5, 1968, was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. SIGN ORDINANCE HEARING DATE SET FOR AUGUST 5, 1968. Upon being advised by Mr. Hois- ington that the ordinance amending the present Sign Ordinance is ready for consider- ation, Cduncilman Shaw''s motion setting hearing date for August 5, 1968, was secon- ded by Councilman Courtney and carried. LOT 10, BLOCK 2, BERTELSON ADDITION EASEMENT VACATION HEARING DATE was set for July 15, 1968, upon motion,of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Cluncilman Johnson and carried. - Upon being advised by I -TAXI DRIVERS' AGE LIMIT TO BE REDUCED TO TWENTY YEARS OF AGE. Mr. Hyde advised Council that Yellow Cab Company has requested authority to reduce' the age limit of -- drivers from twenty-one to twenty years of age in order to be able to hire addit- ional drivers. Following some discussion, Councilman VanValkenburg.offered the following ordinance for First Reading with waiver of Second Reading and moved its' adopt ion : 6/17/68 ORDINANCE- NO. 17 1-4 AN ORDINANCE AENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 - AS TO THE MINIMUM AGE OF TAXICAB DRIVERS THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: amended to read as follows: Each applicant for a taxicab license must be a citizen of the United States, and must be of the age of 20 years or over if a must be authorized to operate Laxicabs and carry on business in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.-" hereby amended to read as follows: He must be a citizen of the United States, of the age of 20 years or over, a resident of Hennepin County or any contiguous county, and be able to read and write the English language." and publication. Motion'for adoption of the ordinanc rollcall there.were five ayes and no na Section 1. The first sentence of Section 3 of Ordinance No. 171 is hereby "Section 3. Application for License. natural person, and in the case of any co--partnership, firm or corporation, Sec, 2. Paragraph (b) of Section 10 of said ordinance, as amended, is "(b) Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in effect immediately upon its passage ATTEST : I dL-& ;;jLLI Village Crerk HUMAN RIGHTS ORDINANCE CONTINUED TO JULY 1, 1968. Mr. Hyde advised Council that the Human Rights Ordinance would not be ready for consideration until July 1, 1968. COST SHARING AGREEMENT APPROVED FOR STORM SEWER 111 BETWEEN MINNEAPOLIS, ST. LOUIS PARK AND EDINA. Mr. Hyde presented the contract between Minneapolis, St. Louis Park and Edina in connection with Storm Sewer 111 which was based on the Village of Edina's share being 33.2% Following some discussion in which it was decided that the Village's share should not exceed $80,000, Councilman VanValkenburg offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Village Council that the Mayor and the Village Manager are hereby authorized to enter into "Agreement Between the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, the Village of Edina, Minnesota, and the City of Minneapolis, Zlinnesota, for Division of Cost for Design and Construction of a Storm Drain on Certain Minn- eapolis streets lying Generally Southwesterly ,of Lake Calhoun," whereby Edina's share of such construction shall be 33.2% of the total cost, provided, however, that Edinals ahare does not exceed $80,000. Motion for adoption of the resolution ~7as s rollcall there were five ayes and no RESOLUTION ATTEST : c-ep, Village C1 erk SUMMIT AVENUE BETWEEN INTERLACHEN BLVD. AND VERNON AVENUE TO BE FOR SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC ONLY. Mr. Hite advised Council that the Hennepin County Highway De- partment, the Village Engineering Department and the Edina Police Department all feel that traffic on Summit Avenue between Interlachen Boulevard and Vernon Avenue constitutes a hazardous condition in gaining access onto Interlachen Boulevard. road alignments at the ineersection of Interlachen Boulevard and Summit Avenue, Councilman Johnson offered the following resolution making Summit Avenue a southbound one way roadway and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Village Council that Summit Avenue between County Hwy. 20 (Interlachen Blvd.) and County Highway 158 (Vernon Avenue) be and is hereby made a "one way'' for southbound vehicles. and on rollcall there were five Following discussion of visibility obstructions and the relative 7 Motion for the adoption of the ATTEST : Mayor Village Clerk 2 6/17/68 ORDINhCE NO, 118A CONTINUED TO NEX'LMEETING. 118-A, which deals with the prevention of fire Mr. and Hyde presented Ordinance No. explosion hazards. Upon recommendation of Nayor Bredesen that additional time is needed to review the ordinance, Councilman Courtney's motion to continue the matter to July I, 1968, was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. ORDINANCE NO. 124-2 APPROVED AT SECOND READING. Mr. Hyde presented Ordinance No. 124-2 which establishes swimming pool permit fees, whereupon Councilman Johnson offered Ordinance No. 126-2 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows: ORDINANCE NO 124-2 AS TO FEE FOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A ST?IMMING POOL t AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 124 THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. to read as follows: "Sec. 5. Permit Fees. The fee for a permit for the construction of a swimming pool shall be the same as the fee for construction of a building, in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 51B of the Village." its passage" and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was second and on rollcall there were five ayes and no Section 5 of Ordinance No. 124 of $he Village is hereby amended Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon ATTEST : Village Clerk "aL- .d. 2!LAGL4 LAKE EDINA I11 DEED RESTRICTION RELEASED. Mr. Whitlock advised Council that there is-no longer any need for the Agreement which provided €or arrangements for payment of improvements to proterty in Lake Edina Second Addition between the Village of Edina and the Estow Corporation, whereupon Counci'lman VanValken- burg offered the following resolution and moved i'ts adoption: BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Village Council that the Agreement filed on February 14, 1961, as Document No. 650365 which provides for arrangements for payment of improvements to property in Lake Edina Second Addition between the Village of Edina and the Estow Corporation be and hereby is released. -Motion for adoption of the resolution was seco rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and I RESOLUTION Councilman Shaw and on ATTEST : BENTON AVENUE BRIDGE AND 50TH STREET SIDEWALK BIDS TO BE TAKEN. Upon recommend- ation of Mr, Hite that bids be taken for the construction of a three span bridge and concrete and bituminous approaches over the Hinneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad on Benton Avenue and for the construction of portland cement concrete sidewalk at 'Nest 50th Street betwGen Itfooddale Avenue and Dale Drive, Councilman Johnson offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IME'ROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR BENTON AVENUE BRIDGE AND I?. 50TH STREET SIDEWALK . BE IT RESOLVED BY THE VILLAGE COUNCIL, VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: I 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvemhts set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids forms, heretofore prepared by the Village Engineer and now on file in the office of the Village Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bul- letin the following notice for bids for improvements: (Official Publication) VILLAGE OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMEN? FOR BIDS 3 SPAN STEEL & CONCRETE BRIDGE AND CONCRETE AND BITlJElINOUS APPROACHES ~- BIDS CLOSE JULY 12, 1968 , SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in the Edina Village Hall, 4801 I?. 50th St., at 11:OO a.m., Friday, July 12, 1968, and the 6/17/68 Edina Village Council will meet at 7:OO p.m. on Monday, July 15, 1968, to con- sider said bids for the construction of a 3 Span Steel & Concrete Bridge and Concrete and Bituminous Approaches over the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Ra.ilroad on Benton Avenue. items: The following are approximate quantities of major 340 Cu. Yd. Structural Concrete '75,000 Lbs. Reinforcing Bars 53,000 Lbs. Structural Steel 1,060 Lin. Ft. C.I.P. Concrete Piling 635 Cu. Yd. Concrete Surfacing 960 Cu. Yd. Aggregate Base Placed Class 5 5,813 Cu. Yd. Common Burrow 3,057 Cu. Yd. Common Excavation Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the Village Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check). plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by cash deposit, bid bond or certified check payable to the Village Clerk' in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL, Said deposit to be returned upon return of the The Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. (Official Publication) VILLAGE OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUKTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS SEALED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK BIDS CLOSE JULY 12, 1968 BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in the Edina Village Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, at 11:OO a.m., Friday, July 12, 1968, and the Edina Village Council will meet at 7:OO p.m. on Monday, July 15, 1968, to consider said bids for the construction of Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk at \?est 50th Street between Wooddale Avenue and Dale Drive. approximate quantities of major items: The following are 9850 Sq. Ft. Sidewalk 270 Tons Class 4 Aggregate Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the Village Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check.) plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by cash deposit, bid bond or certified check payable to the Village Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid. The Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL. Motion for adoption of the resolution on rollcall there were five ayes and Said deposit to be returned upon return of the ATTEST: Mayor Village Clerk d 1967 AUDIT was presented for review of Council as done by Ernst & Ernst. action was taken. No ICE MACHINE FOR SOUTHDALE LIQUOR STORE APPROVED. Upon recommendation of Mr. Dalen that an ice machine be purchased for the Southdale Liquor Store at the installed cost of $998.00, Councilman Courtney's motion approving the purchase was seconded by Councilman Shaw and unanimously carried. LIQUOR REPORT AS OF APRIL 30, 1968, was presented by Mr. Dalen, reviewed and ordered placed on file by motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. GOLF COURSE PROFITS TO BE STUDIED. the golf course was down for the same period in 1967 and was advised by Mr. Hyde that Council P70Uld receive a full report on operations in the near future. Mayor Bredesen noted that the net profit on T. LEA TODD TO BE HONORED AT DINNER. Mr. Hyde recalled to Council that Mr. T. Lea Todd, former Mayor and long time member of the Planning Commission will be honored at a dinner at the new,Edina Library on June 27, 1968. I 6/17/68 PAPER &O BE BID WITH SCHOOLS. less expensive to bid mimeo and ditto paper t'ith Edina Schools than with the County, Councilman Shawls motion approving purchase of paper with the School District as recommended by Mr. Dalen was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. Upon being advised by lfr. Dalen that it will be CLAIMS PAID. carried for payment as follows of these claims: General Fund, $37,190.09; Construction, $338,440.45; Park, Park Construction, Swim Pool, Golf Course and Arens, $20, 356.13; Water Fund,* $47,881.45; Liquor Fund, $72,710.31; Sewer Rental, $1,269.52; Improvement Funds, $4,380.93; Poor Fund and J,S.D.I., $5,555.86; Total, $527,784.74. Notion by Councilman Johnson was seconded by Councilman Shaw and The agenda's business having been covered, Councilman VanValkenburg's motion for adjournment was seconded by Councilman Johnson. Adjournment at 9:55 p.m.