HomeMy WebLinkAbout19680819_regularMINUTES ,OF THE ,REGULAR MEETING' OF THE
EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL H~LD AT VILLAGE HALL ON
MONDAY, AUGUST 19, 1968
u3
ROLLCALL was answered by Councilmen Courtney, Shaw, VanValkenburg and Mayor
-Bredesen.
MINUTES of the meeting of August 5, 1968, were approved as corrected by
motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried.
Councilman Shaw's correction was that Councilman Courtney had moved that
the assessment hearing. for Sanit.ary Sewer 258 and Watermain 219 b.e contin-
ued until August 19, 1968.
PUBLIC HE2lRINGS CONDUCTED ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Pursuant
to due notice given assessment hearings were conducted and action taken as
hereinafter recorded.
1. SANITARY SEWER NO. 258 AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT 80. 219 SPECIAL ASSESS-
MENT LEVIED. (Olinger Road from Olinger Blvd. to County Road 8158). Sanit-
ary Sewer 258 and Watermain 219 affecting the same property owners, hearings
were' conducted simultaneously.
continued from the meeting of August 5. He recalled that Sanitary Sewer 258
total construction cost was $31,451.19, proposed to be assessed against 31
connections at cost of $1,014.55 per assessable connection as against estim-
ated assessment of $1,450.89. Total construction cost for Watermain 219 was
given at $27,149.81, proposed to be assessed against 29 assessable, connections
at a cost of $936.20 as against estimated assessment of $993.53 per assessable
connection. Mr. Burton Nygaard, representing Mr. and Mrs. Mathew McPherson,
stated the objection of the McPhersons to two connection charges proposed to
be assessed against. their property at 5816 Olinger Road.
there are no plans to subdivide this property and requested a deferment of
the assessment until such time as the division might be made.
other properties in the area of similar size were,proposed to be assessed
for only one connection charge. .He also noted that the McPhersons had been
advised by Village officials that only one connection charge would be made
against this property. Mr. Nygaard further advised that no special benefit
would be received from these connections. ME. Hite stated that the improve-
ments were authorized with two connections for this property. Mayor Bredesen
noted that two connections on a lot of this size is a special benefit and
stated that it b7ould not be fair to other property owners in the assessment,
district to haQe to assume the cost of these connections. Mr. Hyde advised
that ehis,is the largest parcel in the area and Mr. Hite pointed out that
other properties in the area have already been subdivided into lots so that
they are not capable of being divided
if- the-McPhersons would be willing to place a deed restriction not to divide
this property. Mr. Nygaard replied that this would not be practical but I
requested a two year deferment of the assessment. Village Attorney Whitlock
advised that the Village could assume the cost of the second assessment from
General Funds until and when the lot is subdivided. Following considerable
discussion, Mr. and Mrs. McPherson advised that it would be satisfactory to
them if a two year deferment were placed on the assessment.
then moved that the first two installments of the second connection charge
for Parcel 3810, Sec. 32, T. 117, R.21 be paid at the end of two years with
5% interest, that thexemaining eight installments be made as scheduled, and
that the Village Attorney be instructed to draft an agreement in recordable
form which would be executed by the McPhersons, was then seconded by Council-
man VanValkenburg and carried.
Minutes.) .
Mr. Hyde noted that these hearings had been
He advised that
He noted that -
I
further. Mayor Bredesen then asked
Councilman Shaw
(See Resolution Ordering Assessmenz later in
STORM SEWER 110 ASSESSMENT LEVIED.
to Minnehaha Creek). Mr. Hyde recalled to Council that the Assessment Hearing
for Storm Sewer 110 had been continued in order that Mr. William McRostie,
attorney representing the Pioneer Development Corporation, could review the
facts of.the assessment. Mr. Hyde presented total assessable construction -
cost at $27,539.73, pzoposed to be assessed a$ainst-2,108.612 assessable
square feet at $0.01306 per square foot against estimated assessment of $0.018
per square foot.
development of Colonial Grove VI Addition.
approval was granted late in 1965, with -final approval being granted in July,
1966,' after plans for a subdivision storm sewer were approved.
sewer was installed and paid for by the developers of Colonia1.Grove VI
Addition.
Addition property draining to Storm Sewer 110 were lots along the northerly
boundary located on W. 56th Street and advised that his clients have not
(West 56th Street from Brookview Avenue
.
Mr. McCrostie presented the historical background of the
He stated that preliminary plat
This storm
Mr. McCrostie further pointed out that the only Colonial Grove VI
8/19/68
3
benefited from the construction of the storm sewer any more Lan the pu lie at
large.
surface water was adequately contained before the construction of this storm
sewer.
sible and proper except where it determines that the benefited area can be
larger than the drainage area and alsp advised that these properties are being
requested to pay a disproportionately high share of the improvement. Mr. Earl
Sharpe also protested the proposed assessment of Colonial Grove VI properties.
Mr. Edward M, Richards, 5421 Brookview Avenue, asked Mr. McCrostie why the Bloom-
berg interests should not pay an equitable share of.the cost of the storm sewer
since it is their property which is being improved and since the development of
this property has necessitated the construction of the storm sewer. Mr. Hite
advised that the storm sewer was necessary in order to develop Colonial Grove
VI Addition and that the system could have been installed by 100% private
participation or by a combination of the two methods.
onial Grove VI Addition was developed, the area was raised substantially, so,
that it would no longer be subject to flooding. This action was the cause of
the formation of a darn at West 56th Street which caused Minnehaha Creek to
flood after a hard rain. Mayor Bredesen recalled that there was some convers-
ation at the improvement hearing about.Colonia1 Grove VI properties being given
credit for the cost of the original stormsewer cost, but that the storm sewer
had been authorized with recognition by Council.that Colonial Grove VI Addition
was sufficiently benefited to warrant those properties sharing the cost of the
improvement. He further noted that if it had not been for: the development of
Colonial Grove VI. Addition, this improvement would not have been necessary.
Recognizing the applicability of Paragraph 5 of the Assessment Policy to this
storm sewer, Councilman VanValkenburg's motion that the storm sewer be assessed
as recommended was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.).
He also stated that at the time Colonial Grove VI Addition was improved,
Mr. McCrostie further noted that the Village Storm Sewer Policy is sen-
He noted that when Col-
(See Resolution
3. SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT NO. S-6 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED. (W. 50th Street
from Halifax Avenue to Indianola Avenue.
cost at $976.64, proposed to be assessed against 184.62 assessable front feet
at $5.29 per front foot. No objections were heard.from.the audience and none
had been presented prior thereto.
Minutes .)
Mr. Hyde presented total construction
(See Resolution ordering Assessment later in
4. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-101. (Gleason Road from Valley View Road to Loch
Moor Drive; Gleason Circle from Glaason Road to cul-de-sac; Scotia Drive from
Gleason Road to 250 feet east; Braeburn Circle from Gleason Road to cul-de-sac;
Loch Moor Drive from Mark Terrace Drive to Gleason Road; Mark Terrace Drive from
Valley View Road to Mark Terrace Circle; Mark Terrace Circle from Mark Terrace
Drive to cul-de-sac; Hill-A-Way Court from Mark Terrace Drive to cul-de-sac.)
Mr. Hyde presented total'assessable construction cost at $103,649.70, proposed
to be assessed against 13,07Q.58 assessable feet at $7.93 per assessable foot
as against estimated assessment of $10.71 per assessable foot or $1,147.59 per
lot. No persons appeared to protest the assessment and none had been received
prior thereto, whereupon Councilman Shaw' s motion authorizing the assessment on
a per foot basis was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried.
lution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.)
.
(See Reso-
5. STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-102 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED. (Creek Valley Road
from Gleason Road to 170' East of Nordic Drive; Balder Lane from Gleason Road
to Scandia Road; Scandia Road from Creek Valley Road to Nordic Drive; Nordic
Drive from Scandia Road to Creek Valley Road). Mr. Hyde presented total con-
struction cost at $49,290.82, proposed to be assessed against 7,482.58 assess-.
able feet at $6.59 per assessable foot or against 79 assessable lots at $623.95
per lot.
per assessable lot. Councilman Van Valkenburg's motion authorizing assessment
on a per lot basis as.recommended by the staff was then seconded by Councilman
Shaw and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.)
Estimated assessment was given at.$8.66 per assessable foot or $825.24
6. STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-105 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED. (Arb.our Avenue from
Arb.our Lane northerly to the South line of Lot 6, Block 2, C.lagramar Second'Ad-
dition.)
be assessed against 1,506.27 assessable front feet at $15.03 per assessable
foot as against estimated cost of $13.68 per assessable foot.
appeared to offer protests and none had been received prior thereto,
Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.)
Mr. Hyde presented total construction cost at $22,639.24 proposed to
No persons
(See
u3 p. u3
u
8/19/68 \
7. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-165. (York Avenue from West 55th Street to West
56th Street).
posed to be assessed against 1,200.27 assessable feet at $3.73 per assessable
foot as against estimated assessment of $6.60 per assessable foot.
were heard from the audience and none had been received prior thereto.
Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes).
8. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-106, (Cooper Circle from Cooper Avenue westerly
to end of cul-de-sac).
proposed to be assessed against 7-213 assessable lots atS649.04 per assessable
lot as against estimated assessment of $11.68 per assessable foot.or $1,076.78
per assessable lot.
on a per lot basis as recommended by the staff was then seconded by Councilman
Courtney and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.)
9. STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-107 SPEGIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED. (Philbrook Lane from
Wooddale Avenue to W. 58th Street). Mr. Hyde presented total construction cost
at: $20,478.91, proposed to be assessed against 1,893.73 assessable front feet
at $10.81 per assessable foot or $841.61 per lot for the full lots on the north
and east sides of the street and $280.54 per lot for the lots on the south side
of the street. Estimated assessment was given at $13.97 per assessable foot or
$1,066.26 per lot for the north and east sides of the street and $355.62 per
lot on the south side of the street.
essment and none had been received prior thereto.
approving assessment on a per lot basis as recommended by the staff was then
ment later in Minutes.)
Mr. Hyde presented total construction cost at $4,477.01 pro-
No protests
(See
-
Mr. Hyde presented total construction cost at $4,975.98,
Councilman VanValkenburg's motion authorizing assessment
No persons objected to the proposed ass-
Councilman Shaw's motion
(See Resolution Ordering Improve- -seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried.
10.. STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-108 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED. (Creek View Lane
from Limerick Lane to cul-de-sac). Mr. Hyde presented total construction cost
at $7,180.86 proposed to be assessed against 1,131.8 assessable front feet at.
$6.35 per assessable foot or against 13-213 assessable lots at $525.42 per lot.
Estimated assessment was given at $11.02 per assessable foot or $849.36 per
assessable lot. Mr. Floyd Russell, 5723 France Avenue South, requested that
the assessment be levied on a per ,lot basis as recommended by the staff. Coun-
cilman Courtney's motion authorizing the assessment on a per lot basis was then
seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
later i-n Minutes.).
(See Resolution Ordering Improvement
11.
East of Computer Avenue).
$64,062.92, proposed to be assessed against 4,632.17 assessable front feet at .
$13.83 per assessable foot as against estimated assessment of $19.75 per assess-
able foot. No persons appeared to offer protests to the assessment and none had
been received .prior thereto.
utes .)
STREET'IMPROVEMENT BA-104. '(West 77th Street from Parklawn Avenue t.0 230'
Mr. Hyde presented total construction cost at
(See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Min-
12. ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-4 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED.
(Area bounded by France Avenue, Xerxes Avenue, West 66th Street and Crosstown
Highway.) Mr. Hyde presented total construction cost at $33,653.28, proposed
to be assessed against 48 assessable lights at $701.11 per assessable light as
against $973.87 .estimated assessment.
been presented prior thereto.
Minutes .)
No objections were heard and none had
(See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in
13. BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT BR-2 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED. (Arcadia Avenue con-
nection ovgr Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad.
improvement was authorized on 100% petition, Mr. Hyde presented total construc-
tion cost at $79,656.78 proposed to be assessed against 316,855 assessable
square feet at $0.1783 and against 192,125 assessable square feet at $0.1189.
Lots proposed.to be assessed at $0.1189 include Lots 2 thru 19, Block 2, Grand-
view Heights and Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, Block 1, Grandview Heights and Tracts
A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 7. The remaining lots in the assessment
district which are closest to the improvement are .proposed to be assessed at
$0.1783 per square foot.
had been received prior thereto.
following resolution levying assessments on the above improvements and moved
its adoption:
Stating that this
No persons were present to offer objections and none
Councilman VanValkenburg then offered the
8/19/68 f
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONEIRMING
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF ...
SANITARY SEWER 258, WATERMAIN 219, STORM SEWER 110,
. SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT S-6, STREET IMPROVEMENTS NOS,
BA-101, BA-102, BA-105, A-165, BA-106, BA-107, BA-108, BA-104
ORNAMENTAL LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT L-4 AND BRIDGE IMPROVEMENT NO. BR-2
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, as fol-
lows :
1." The Village has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed
assessment rolls for the improvements hereinagter referred to, and at such hear-
ings held on August 19, 1968, has considered all oral and written objections
presented against the levy of such assessments.
2, Subject to the amendments made in paragraph 3 of this resolution, each of
the assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of
the Village Clerk for Sanitary Sewer 258, Watermain 219, Storm Sewer 110, Side-
walk Replacement S-6, Street Improvements Nos. BA-101, BA-102, BA-105, A-165,.
BA-106, BA-107, BA-108, BA-104, Ornamental Lighting Improvement L-4 and Bridge
Improvement BR-2 does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improve-
ments upon the lots, tracts or parcels of,land so assessed, and all of said
assessments are hereby adopted and confimed as the proper assessments on account
of said respective improvements to be spread against the benefited lots, parcels,
and tracts of land described therein.
3. Said assessments are hereby amended as follows:
Parcel 3810, Sec, 32, T. 117, R. 21 for Sanitary Sewer No. 258 and for Watermain
No, 219 is to be deferred so as to be payable in 1971 in accordance with agree-
ment drawn by the Village Attorney and signed by the property owners; Street Im-
provement BA-101 is to be assessed on an assessable foot basis; Street Improve-
ment No. BA-102 is to be assessed on a per lot basis; Street Improvement No.
BA-106 is to be assessed on a per lot basis; and Street Improvement No. BA-1Q8
4.
Installment.to be payable lith 1968 taxes collected in 1969 and all unpaid in-
stallments.shal1 bear interest at the rate of 5% per annum on the entire assess-
ment from the date hereof to Dec. 31, 1969. ,The number of such annual install-
ments shall be as follows:
Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 258, 10 installments; Watermain Improvement No.
219, 10 installments; Stprm Sewer Improvement No. 110, 10 installments; Sidewalk
Replacement No. S-6, 5 installments; Street Improvements Nos. BA-101, BA-102,
BA-105, A-165, BA-106, BA-107, and BA-108, and BA-104, 10 installments; Ornamental
Lighting Improvement No. L-4, 10 installments and Bridge Improvement No. BR-2, 20
installments,
5.
-a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicage of said assessments, with
each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be.extended
on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution.
6. The Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessments which may he
payable by a county, a political subdivision or by the owner of any right of way,
as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any
such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the Village Treasurer shall
. arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said section.
Motion for adoption of the rresolution was seco
rollcall there were four ayes and no nays and
I
One connection charge against
is to be assessed on a per lot basis. r-
The assessments shall be-payable in equal annual installments, the first
.
The Village Clerk shall forth1qith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor
ATTEST : -
t -
PUBLIC JBARING CONDUCTED FOR STORM SEWER ,IMPROVEMENT NO, 1i6. (j iffidavits of
Publicat,ion in the Edina Sun on August 8 and.15 and of Mailing on August 9,
1968, which affidavits were ordered approved as to form and ordered placed on
file,
taken as herein recorded.
tion of a storm sewer on an easement line between Lots I. and 2, Block 1 and a
Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Gleason's 4th Addition from the South line of Addition
North to Nine Mile Creek.
$6,854.37, 50% of the cost, or $3,427.18 proposed to be assessed against Lots
1 and 2, Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Gleason's 4th Addition and the
Pursuant to due notice given, public hearing was conducted and action
Mr. Hyde presented 100% petition requesting construc-
He presented estimated cost of the improvement at
..
8/19/68
I 19-7
other 50% proposed to be assessed against Lot I, Block 1, Gleason's 1st Addition.
No'comments were heard from the audience and no objections had been received
prior thereto, whereupon Councilman VanValkenburg offered the following resolu-
tion and moved its adoption:
BE 1T.RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this
Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to
owners of each.parce1 within the area proposed to be assessed on the following
proposed improvement:
On an easement line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2,
Gleason's 4th Addition from the South- line of Addition North to Nine Mile Creek;
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Coun-
cil has duly considered the views of all-persons interested, and being fully ad-
vised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the construction
of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent
domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction
and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated
and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT
116; and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include Lots 1 and 2
Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, GleCson's Addition; and Lot 1, Block 1,
Gleason's 1st Addition.
rollcall there were four ayes and no nays
RESOLUTION APPROVING STORM SEWER NO. 116
CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEIER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING:
Motion.for adoption of the resolution Councilman Shaw and on
ATTEST : Mayor
Y
ige Clerk - Vi112
ORDINANCE NO. 261-160 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file.
Hoisington presented Ordinance 261-160 for Second Reading, noting that First
Reading had been granted on April 15, 1968. With the aid of the view-graph,
Mr. Hoisington indicated the zoning changes which would be approved by this
ordinance for zoning requests of National Food Stores for Automobile Parking
District and R-1 Residential District to C-2 Commercial District, of Pure Oil
Company from Automobile Parking District and R-1 Resident5al District to C.-4
Commercial District and of Gisselbeck and Schneider from R-1 Residential Dis-
trict to R-4 Multiple Residential District. Mr. Hoisington noted that since
First Reading was approved, details have be'en worked out and variances have
been granted in all three cases and that Planning Commission and the staff
have recommended approval. Mr. Kenneth Mayo representing National Food Stores
advised that he would be glad to answer any questions with regard to the re-
zoning. Mr. Hite advised that Planning Com-
mission has asked that they be instructed to review the building plans before
the Buclding Permit is issued. Moving that Planning Commission be instructed
to review the building plans as recommended by Mr. Hite, Councilman Shaw of-
fered Ordinance No. 261-160 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as
follows :
Mr.
No questions were forthcoming.
ORDINANCE NO. 261-160
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA BY ESTABLISHING
R-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ADDITIONAL C-2, C-4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS AND
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA,.ORDAINS:
Paragraph 3, Boundaries of the Commercial District of Section
9, (Commercial District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised Ordinances of the Vil-
lage of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding the following sub-
paragraphs :
Section 1.
From Automobile Parking District to C-2 Commercial District:
(18) The West 95 feet of the East 155 feet of that part of Lot 43,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 172, lying South of the North 175
feet thereof.
The tract beginning at a point 78 feet North and 65 feet East
of the Southwest corner of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdivision No.
172; thence West 24.25 feet; thence North to a-point 175 feet
South of the North line of said Lot 43; thence East to a point
155 feet West of the East line of said Lot 43; thence South to
(19)
- the point of beginning.- =
(20) The East 95 feet of the West 240 feet of Lot 41, Auditor's Sub-
8/19/68 <
division No. 172.
From R-1 Residential District to C-2 Commercial District:
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
The West 145 feet of Lot 41, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172.
The West 65 feet of the South 78 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 172.
The South 188 feet of Lot 42, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172.
The West 40.75 feet of the North 103 feet of the South 181
feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172.
Section 2. Section 9, Commercial District, of Ordinance No. 261 of the
Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding at the end of
Subgaragraph 3 (Boundaries of Commercial District) the-following: . From Automobile Parking District to C-4 Commercial Districts:
(29) The South 50 feet of the North 150 feet of Lot 42, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 172.
The South 18 feet of the North 168 feet of Lot 42, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 172.
From R-1 Residential District to C-4 District:
(30)
Section 3. Section 4, Multiple Residence District, of Ordinance No. 261
of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding at the
end of Subparagraph 3 (Multiple Residence District Boundaries) the following:
From R-1 Residential District to R-4 Multiple Residence District:
. (25) Lots 52, 53, 54, and 55, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172.
(26) That part of Lots 49 and 51, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172
lying South of road.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and Siction 4.
after its passage and publication accordin
Motion for adoption of the resolution was
on rollcall there were ..€four ayes and no n
ATTEST :
I
i
slQ5W-b. ?LdaL&+
Village Clerk -
OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO: 261-166 GRANTED SECOND READING.
Hoisington presented Office Building District Ordinance No. 261-166 for Second
Reading, noting that First Reading was. granted on August 5, 1968.,Mr. Hoisington
pointe-d out that one important change would be the creation of the 0-2 District,
the need for which is anticipated in the Southdale area.
would be the change in parking rqquirements from the present requirement of one
parking space for each 250 square feet of gross rental floor area to one parking
space for each 200 square feet of gross rental floor area. Mayor Bredesen asked
for a definition of "gross rental floor area" andwas qdvised that this area
doesnot include mechanical rooms or central tenant storage space.
a question as to requirements when fqod servece areas are involved, Mr. HGte
advised that this would be considered the same as other office building area
unless the food service area is located so as to at.tract outside business.
this were the case, it would be then considered Commercial District rather than
Office District. In reply to a question of Mayor Bredesen relative to the pos-
sibility of a building which would house offices, apartments and restaurants,
Mr. HoiSington replied that there isno pyovision for such a combination in
any of the zoning ordinances. Following considerable discussion, Councilman
VanValkenburg offered Ordinance No. 261-166 as recommended by the staff and by
Planning Commission and moved its adoption as follows:.
ORDINANCE NO. 261-166
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE VILLAGE AS TO REGULARIONS ON USES AND
Mr.
Another major change
Replying to
If
'
BUILDINGS APPLICABLE IN THE OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section 8 IOffice Buiiding District) of Ordin-
ance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village, as amended, is further amended
to read as follows:
is hereby established and shall further be divided into subdistricts designated
as Districts 0-1 and 0-2. The boundaries of each subdistrict shall include the
follow,ing lands:
"1. Boundaries of Office Building District. The Office Building District
. Subdistrict 0-1:
All lands now in the Office Building District, in accordance with the
legal descriptions thereof contained in the existing Ordinance No. 261,
as amended by Ordinances Nos. 261-$39, 261-146, 261-157 and 261-158.
8/19/68
m
43 rrr u rc;r
Subdistrict 0-2:"
Sec. 2. Subparagraphs (a) through (e) of Paragraph 3 of said Section 8
of Ordinance No. 261, as amended, are hereby further amended to read as fol~ows:
The' following minimum restrictions shall apply to all buildings that may be
erected, converted or structurally altered in Office Building Districts:
shall not-exceed 0.5 times the lot area.
"3. Restrictions on Uses Permitted Within the Office Building District.
'&(a) Floor Area Ratio. The gross floor area of all buildings on a lot
"(b) Lot Coverage. Not more than 30% of the lot area shall be occupied
"(c)
"(d) Building Setbacks. In the 0-1 and 0-2 subdistricts, the minimum
-by buildings.
Building Height: Building height in the 0-1 subdistrict shall be
limited to four stories.
- building setback from any side or rear property line shall be no less than 20
feet (25 feet if abutting a public street) or the average height of the build-
ing, whichever is greater. The minimum building setback from any front property
line shall be 35 feet or the average height of the building, whichever is greater.
In the 0-2 subdistrict any structure 5 or 6 stories in height shall be no closer
to any R-1 District properties, except those utilized for non-residential pur-
poses, than two times the average height of the building. For a 7 or 8 story
structure, the setback shall be no less than three times the building height
and for a structure 9 or more stories in height, the setback shall be no less
than four times the building height from any R-1 District properties, except
those utilized for non-residential purposes, Where a front yard faces an R-1
Residential District across a street, the setback from that street shall be
not less than 50 feet.
Commercial District or a Planned Industrial District, the front and side yard
setbacks shall not be less than those prescribed for the major planned district.
"(e) Off-street Parking. Off-street parking facilities accessory to uses
allowed in the Office Building District shall be provided in accordance with the
following requirements and regulations:
The required number of off-street parking spaces shall be
located on the same property occupied by the principal use or on another adjac-
ent lot or parcel under the control of the owner of property occupied by the
principal use.
from ownership in fee simple or a lease or easement for a period of not less than
25 years.
-thereof; provided, such parking space is not separated from the building site
by a public street right-of-way.
Design and Construction. Off-street parking areas shall be so de-
signed that vehicles can be parked in a convenient and orderly fashion.
ing areas shall be surfaced and maintained with a hard, all-weather, durable,
dust-free surfacing material and shall be properly drained. Each parking space
shall be clearly outlined or otherwise marked and-shall, have a minimum width of
8-1/2 feet and a length of 19 feet exclusive of aisles and maneuvering space.
Clear aisle widths shall be at least 12 feet for 45 degree parking, 18 feet for
60 degree parking and 24 feet for 90 degree parking. Traffic moving from one
part of a parking lot to another shall be capable of doing so without using a
public street.
- When the Office Building-District is an integral part of either a Planned
(1) Location.
For the purpose of this section such "control" may be derived
Parking shall be provided on the building lot or within 200 feet
(2)
I
Park-
All open off-street parking areas shall be effectively screened by a
. wall or fence of acceptable design, or by a compact hedge along all sides which
adjoin or are directly across the street from property in a residential zone.
Such wall, fence or hedge shall be not less than 4 feet high and not more than
6 feet high and shall be maintained in good condition.
not be used for advertising purposes. 'All lighting used to illuminate off-street
parking areas shall be,so arranged as to deflect the light away from adjacent
properties in residential use.
In the 0-1 and 0-2 subdistqicts, no parking fac'ilities shall occupy any
required front pard setback; such area being defined as that located immediately
in front of the structure between its dide walls to the required depth from the
street line. In both districts, parking shall be located no closer than ten
feet to any side or rear lot line nor closer than five feet to any building.
. The wall or fence shall
(3) Number of Spaces Required. -
Offices:
Medical and Dental Offices:
Private Club or Lodge: 1 space for each 250 square,feet of gross floor area
devoted to office use or 1 space for each 3 seats in the largest place of assem-
bly, wh3chever is greater.
Accessory Uses:
1-space for each 200 square feet of floor area. ,
6 spaces for each doctor or dentist.
8 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of floor area."
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
, its' passage and publication.
s 8/19/68
Motion for adoption of the resolution was secon
rollcall there were 'four ayes and no nays
ATTEST : 1JL b- Ya
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO. 261-167 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. Mr. Hoisington presented Ordin-
ance No. 261-167 which amends the Zoning Ordinance as to setback and yard require-
ments in the Commercial District, advising that this ordinance uses the same
wording as the R-5 and 0-2 Ordinances and brings the Zoning Ordinance more closely
to conformance with the setback requirements. Following some discussion, Council-
man VanValkenburg offered Ordinance No. 261-167 for Second Reading as recommended
by the staff and by the Planning Commission as follows.:
I
ORDINANCE NO. 261-167
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
AS TO SETBACK AND YARD REQUIREMENTS
IN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
- -
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
of Ordinance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Section 1. Subparagraph C of paragraph 8 of Section 9 (Commercial District)
-
"C. Setbacks and Yards:
(a) The minimum building setback from any Commercial District Boundary
or public street shall be as set forth herein or the average height of the build-
ing, whichever is greater:
District Front Interior Side Side Street c-1 35 15 25 25
c-2 35 25 25 25 c-3 50 50 50 50
c-4 45 - 25 45 25
AT1 Planned Com-
Rear -
mercial Districts 50 50 50 50
(All measured in feet)
(b) Exceptions :
(1) In the C-3 and PC-3 Districts any structure 5 or 6 stories in height
shall be no closer to any R-1 District properties, except those utilized for non-
residential purposes, than two times the average*height-of the building. For a
7-or 8-story structure, the setback shall he no less than three times the building
height and for a structure 9 or more stories in height, the setback shall be no
less than four times-the building height from any R-1 District properties, except
those utilized for non-residential purposes.
In Districts C-1, C-2, and C-3, when more than 25% of the frontage on
the.side of a street between intersections is occupied by structures having set-
backs from the street right-of-ways of greater or lesser amounts than hereinafter
required, the average setback of all existing buildings between the intersections
shall be maintained by all new or relocated structures. In the event a building
is to be built where there is such an established average setback different from
that required hereinafter and there are existing buildings on'one side only, the
front setback of said new building need be no greater than that of the next adjoin-
ing.existing building. In a case where the building is to be built where there is
such an established average setback and there are existing buildings on both sides
of the said new building, the front setback shall not be required to be greater
than that which would be established by connecting a straight line between the
nearest front corners of the adjoining existing buildings.
rear lot line is a Commercial District Boundary.
reduced by one-half'if rear yard abuts the rear yard of the next adjoining prop-
erty and if rear wall contains no windows or doors.
In the C-2 and PC-2 Districts, a building whose length issequal to or
exceeds three times its average height if such height is 3 stories or more shall
be no'closer to R-1 District properties, except those utilized for non-residential
purposes, or to public sights-of-way than 2 times its average height."
its passage and publication.
(2)
(3) Interior side and rear yard requirements apply only when the side or
Rear yard requirements may be
(4)
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was
rollcall there were 'four ayes and no
Courtney and on
ATTEST: Mayor
8/19/68 c
$ w u
WALLACE KENNETH R-5 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ZONING REQUEST CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER
9, 1968.
for R-5 residential District zoning at the intersection of Vernon Avenue and
Hansen Road (Ordinance No. 261-136) should be continued to September 9, 1968,
whereupon Councilman Courtney's motion continuing the hearing as recommended
was seconded by.Councilman Shaw and carried.
Mr. Hoisington advised Council that the request of Mr. Wallace Kenneth
MORNINGSIDE AaA ZONING RECLASSIFICATION ORDINANCE GRANTED FIRST READING.
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered
placed on file.
ing, advising that since the annexation of the Village of Morningside, the
properties have never been reclassified to eonform to the Edina Zoning Ordin--
ance. Mr. Hoisington pointed.out that there are existing uses in the Morning-
side business area that are not considered to be appropriate in a neighborhood
center such as this, and indicated that these businesses would be considered
%on-conforming uses." In reply to a question regarding an area which is
presently zoned for parking, Mr. Hite advised that this could possibly be re-
zoned if anrequest should be made but that it is hoped to retain as much park-
ing area as possible. The gentleman pointed out that it is,not fair to make
one property owner bear the burden of all parking in the area. Following con-
siderable discussion, Councilman VanValkenburg offered Ordinance No. 261-169
for-First Reading as follows:
Mr, Hoisington presented Ordinance No. 261-169 for First Read-
ORDINANCE NO. 261-169
AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING PROPERTIES IN
THE FORMER VILLAGE OF MORNINGSIDE
TO VILLAGE OF EDINA ZONING DISTRICTS
R-1 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, R-2 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT,
OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT, AUTOMOBILE PARKING
DISTRICT, C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OR C-4 COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT; AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Properties in the former Village of Morningside are hereby
rezoned by transferring,them into the various districts established by Ord-
inance No. 261 of the Village. Any such properties not specifically described
below are hereby transferred to the Single Family Dwelling District.
extended by adding to the description of the District contained in paragraph
1 of Section 4 of Ordinance No. 261 of the Village the properties described
below, and said paragraph is hereby amended accordingly:
Di s t r ic t R- 2 :
(46)
(47) Tracts B and C, Registered Land Survey,No. 549, Section 7, Township 28,
Range 24.
tended by adding to the description of the District contained in paragraph 1 of
Section 5 of Ordinance No. 261 of the Village the properties described below,
and said paragraph is hereby amended accordingly:
(1) That part of Lot 7, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement lying north of the
South 130 feet thereof.
(m) All 9f Lots 4 and 5, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement, and that portion
of Lot 6, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement lying South of a line represented
by the westerly extension of the South line of Lot 3 and including vacated alley.
(n) Lot 4, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement lying North of the South 75 feet
thereof ,
(0) All of Lot 5, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement, except the West 10 feet
of the South 130 feet thereof.
(p) Lot 6, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement lying North of the South 130 feet
thereof.
Sec. 4. The boundaries of the Office Building District are hereby extended
by adding to the description of the District contained in paragraph 2 of Section
8 of Ordinance No. 261 of the Village the properties described below, and said
paragraph is hereby amended accordingly:
(aa)
(bb) (cc) The South 130 feet of Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrange-
ment measured at right angles from the north line of Sunnyside Avenue.
Sec. 5. The boundaries of the Commercial District are hereby extended by
adding to the description of the District contained in paragraph 3.of Section
9 of Ordinance No. 261 of the Village the properties described below, and said
paragraph is hereby amended accordingly:
(14)
of France Avenue, North of Lotrl, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement, and East
Sec. 2. The boundaries of the Multiple Residence District are hereby
The East 50 feet of the North 125 feet of Lot 80, Morningside Subdivision.
Sec. 3. The boundaries of the Automobile Parking District are hereby ex-
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 549, Section 7, Township 28, Range 24.
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 517, Section 7, Township.28, Range 24,
-C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT:
That part of Block 13, Waveland Park lying South of West 44th Street, West
8/19/68 f
of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 517, Section 7, Township 28, Range 24 ex-
cept the westerly 10 feet thereof.
(15) Lots 1, 2,. and 3, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement.
(16) The South 75 feet of Lot 4, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement measured
at right angles from the north line of Sunnyside Avenue.
(17) 'Lot 6 and the West 10 feet of Lot 5, measured at right angles from the
north line of Sunnyside Avenue to a.depth of 130 feet therefrom.
(18) That part of Lot 79, Morningside, lyint South of the North 149.7 feet.
(19) All of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement and that
portion of Lot 6, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement lying north of a line
represented by the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 3.and including
vacated alley.
C-4 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT:
(31)
(32) Commencing at a point on the West line of
France Avenue 405 feet North of the South line of Section 7$ Tgwnship 28, Range
24; thence South 145 feet; thence West 77 fee$; thence North 0 18'54" West-to
the Intersection with a line bearing South 59 54'28'' West from the point of
beginning; thence Northeasterly along said bearing line to beginning.
This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon its passage and publication.
ORDINANCE NO. 261-168 GRANTED FIRST READING.
sented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hois-
ington presented Ordinance No. 261-168 relating to the R-1 Single Family Resi-
dence District for First Reading, noting that this ordinance holds particular .
significance for lots 60 feet and less in width and concerns side yard require-
ments for both houses and garages. Current requirement calls for a five foot
side yard for a single story house and an additional 1/2 foot of side yard for
each foot the house exceeds a height of 15 feet.
the addition of a second story.to an existing house on a 50 or 60 foot lot un-
less a variance can be acquired. The amendment also would permit rear yard
detached garages to be located three feet from the property lineeon lots of
all sizes, rather than the five feet presently required.
cussion, Councilman Courtney offered the following ordinance €or First Reading
and moved its adoption as follows:
I The North 149.7 feet of Lot 79, Morningside.
A parcel described as follows:
Sec. 6.
r
Affidavits of Notice were pre-
This requirement prohibits
Following some dis-
ORDINANCE NO. 261-168 .*
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SETBACK AND YARD
REQUIREMENTS IN THE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING
DISTRICT; AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261
THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Dwelling District) of 0rdinance.No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance of the Village) is
hereby amended by adding the following to the schedule of setback and yard
Section 1. Subparagraph (a) of panagraph 4 of Section 3 (Single Family
requirements : '.
"(a) Setbacks and Yards
Front Street Side Street Interior Rear;
Structure accessory to
Yard - Setback Setback Side
single family residences
except detached garages in
Rear Yark detached garage
accessory to single family
residence 30 15 3. 3
3 of said Ordinance No. 261 is hereby amended to tead as follows:
Single family residence lots having a width at
the building line of less than 60 feet may have an interior side yard less than
10 feet in width but in no event less than five feet. On lots 60 feet.or more
in width at the building line, residences whose average height above ground level
alongside the residence is in excess of 15 feet shall have an.additiona1 side
yard dimension beyond that required heretofore of not less than six inches for
.each foot .the average height exceeds 15 feet."
upon its passage and publication.
the rear yard 30 15 5 5
Sec. 2. Subsubparagraph (3) of subparagraph (a) of paragraph 4 of Section
"(3) Interior Side Yard.
D
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall besin full force and effect immediately
SAM SCHNEIDER R-2 ZONING REQUEST IN BLOCK 1, JONES KNOLLS ADDITION CONTINUED TO
SEPTEMBER 16.
and ordered placed on file.
Schneider for zoning change of Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 1, Jones Knolls Addition,
from R-1 Residential District to R-2 Multiple Residential District.
ton pointed out that land use in the area consists of multiple development yd
a gas station to the south across Eden Prairie Road, single family development
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form,
Mr. Hoisington presented the request of Mr. Sam
Mr. Hoising-
8/19/68
to the north and vacant R-1 District land both to the east and west. The
lots in Valley Park Addition, just east of the site in huestion, are subject
to a deed restriction which limits their use to single family dwellings, which
restriction the courts have refused to lift.
feel that R-2 zoning in this area would have no adverse effect on other prop-
erties of the area and have recommended approval of the zoning change. Mr.
James Harnett, 6029 Kaymal; Drive, advised that he bought his property eight
years ago in reliance on R-1 zoning on Eden Prairie Road. He stated that he and
his neighbors have come to Council a number of tirqes in opposition to similar
proposals and that they have been grateful for Council action denying the zoning
change at those times. Mrs. John Connelly, 6033 Kaymar Drive, advised that they
had tried to buy Lot 13 and were told that the property could not be sold for
single family dwellings because it was proposed to erect double dwellings on
the property. Mr. D. P. Poiboisk, 6025 Kaymar Drive, advised that he objects
to the proposed zoning. He stated that an attempt is beirig made to purchase
five lots on Eden Prairie'Road for construction of single family dwellings.
Objections to the proposed zon'ing were also expressed by Mr. Wm. Reich, Jr.,
6113 Kaymar Drive, and Mr. R. A. Pfohl, 6101 Kaymar Drive. Mr. Sam Schneider
advised that he proposes to construct two buildings on the three existing lots
in question and that the buildings would cost approximately $70,000 in addition
to the cost of the land. He stated that these buildings would be a credit to
the area and that they would provide a favorable transition between single
family dwellings and the Eden Prairie development to the west of Eden Prairie
Road.
ticularly impressed by a double bungalow in the price range mentioned by Mr.
Schneider and that tennats of these units would not be apt to be permanent
residents and that they would interfere with her privacy. Mayor Bredesen
pointed out that there is no way that the Village can control the value of an
investment. Mr. L. E. Jones, 571.7 South Blake Road, advised that they had .
not received a notice of this hearing but advised that he would have no objec-
tion to the zoning change. Councilman Shaw advised that he concurs with the
recommendation of the Planning Commission that double dwellings offer an ob-
vious transitional usage along the entire frontage of Eden Pra$a'%-e Road.
cilman VanValkenburg then moved that since neighbors are actively trying to I
resolve the proposed rezaning by purchase of the property adjacent to the
land proposed to be rezoned, the hearing should be continued to September 16,
1968. Councilman Courtney seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
Planning Commission and the staff
An unidentified lady in the audience advised that she would not be par-
Coun-
CHEROKEE SALES REQUEST FOR R-4 ZONING AT GLEASON ROAD AND CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY
DENIED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form
and ordered placed on file. Mr, Hoisington presented the request of Cherokee
Sales for R-4 Residential District zoning for the N.E. quadrant of Gleason
Road and the Crosstown Highway, in order to construct six apartment buildings
each three stories in height. The Village proposal for development in the
area calls for a large park and recreational facility to the east and a school-
park complex to the south.
of Gleason Road and the Crosst6wn and-single family development is occurring
to the north and west. Mr. John Crouch, attorney representing Cherokee Sales,
advised that the adjacent property is zoned R-1 only so that flexibility of
development could be maintained. He pointed out that adjacent property to the
south is highway right-of-way and that the school and church are not adjacent
to the site in question and that the terrain was not suitable for Single family
dwelling construction. Mr. Hite noted that there is ample evidence that single
family dwellings have been built on terrain more severe than the land under
consideration. Mr. Hite further advised that new homes have been built along
the Crosstown as near its interchange and that no evidence has been presented
that would suggest lands near the crosstown are not suitabl'e for the uses
permitted by R-1 zoning. Mr. Crouch pointed out that it is the cumulative
effect that makes this property undesirable for single family dwellings.
Oscar Jones of Cherokee Sales, Inc., advised that this apartment complex would
be aesthetically desirable and compatible with the neigtiborhood.
noted that this complex would be a high rental type of building which would be
of value to the Village from a tax producing standpoint. Mr. Jones challenged
that the Village is keeping valuable taxable land off 'khe tax rolls.
Bredesen advised that the value of land cannot be determined until its use is
determined.
ordinance should be passed for the general welfare of the community and noted
further that the proposed apartment units would not be'detrimental to the
health and safety of Edina. Following considerable discussion, Councilman
VanValkenburg advised that he does not see anything to change the evidence
presented by the Planning Commission to justify denial of the Planning Commission
A church is to be built in the southwest quadrant
Mr.
He further
Mayor
Mr. Crouch stated that Minnesota Statutes provide that a zoning
,
8/19/68
1
recommendation of this zoning change and thereupon moved that the request of Cher-
okee Sales, Inc., for R-4 zoning at Gleason Road and the Crosstown Highway be
denied for the reasons stated in the minutes of the Planning Commission.
was seconded by Councilman Shaw and. unanimously carried,
ANDREWS ADDITION PLAT APPROVAL HEARING TO BE CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 9. Affidavits
of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file,
Upon motion of Councilman VanValkenburg, seconded by-Councilman Shaw and carried,
the Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat Approval of Andrews Addition was continued
to September 9, 1968.
Motion
-
- I BENTON AVENUE BRIDGE AWARD OF BIDS CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 9. Upon motion of Coun-
cilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried, the award of bid for the
Benton Avenue Bridge was continued to September 9, 1968.
ALLEY SURFACING AWARD OF BID CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 9.
the award of bid for Alley Improvements A-167, A-168, and A-169 which was con-
tinued from Augbst 5, 1968, be again continued, this time until September 9, 1968,
He stated that the cost of maintaining asphalt surEackd alleys is high and is
paid from General Funds.
alleys in the Village with concrete, with the General Fund assuming the additional
cost of the concrete surfacing, or 25% of the construction cost. The cost of con-
crete alleys being substantially higher than the cost estimated at the improvement
hearings for A-167, A-168, and 8-169, Councilman Shaw offered the following reso-
lution setting a new hearing for the surfacing of these alleys and moved its
adopt ion :
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
...
Mr. Hyde recommended that
He recommended a new five year program of paving all
ALLEY SURFACING
1. The Village Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the fbrm of Notice
of Hearing set for below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said
report is hereby approved and directed to be placed oh file in the office of the
Village Clerk,
2, This Council shall meet on Monday, September 9, at 7:OO p.m. in the Edina
Village Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested
in said improvements.
3.
and pukose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week
for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than
three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affe$ted prop-
erties in substantially the following form:
The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place
(Offici a1 Publid at io;)
Village of Edina
Hennepin County, Mirinesota
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING
- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
IMPROVEMENT NOS. A-167, A-168, AND A-169
AND STORM SEWER UNDER IMPROVEMENT A-168
EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL will meet at_ the Edina Village Hall on Monday, September
9, 1968, at 1:OO pa., to consider the following proposed improvements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the Village as set forth
below:
The
CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING
ESTIMATED COST
AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS:
IMPROVEMENT NO. A-167
Alley between William Avenue and Bedford
Avenue and between West 51st Street and
'West 52nd Street:
IMPROVEMENT NO. A-168
Alley between Bedford Avenue and William
Avenue and between West 51st Street and
Interlachen Blv'd.
Alley between Bedford Avenue and Oxford
Avenue and between West 51st Street and
Interlachen Blvd.
-
IMPROV'EMENT NO. A-169
$25 , 876.09
8/19/68
CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING:
IMPROVEMENT NO. A-168
Alley between Bedford Avenue and William
Avenue and between West 51st Street and
Interlachen Blvd. $ 2,568.73
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Permanent Street
Surfacing and Storm Sewer includes all lots and tracts of land abutting the
alleys proposed to be improved.
Florence B. Hallberg
Village Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney
and on rollcall there were four ayes a
adopted. . -
ATTEST :
upon introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT C-98
UPON PETITION THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of-the Village of Edina, Minnesota,em3
1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed request-
ing the Council to construct an improvement consisting of Grading and Gravel-
ing on Vandervork Avenue between Division Street and dead end, and to assess
the entire cost against the property of,petitioners, and that,said petition
has been aigned by all owners of real property abutting on said-street where
said improvement is to be located.
2.
ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031.
is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings
as GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT C-98. The entire cost of said improve-
ment is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties abutting on sad
follows : I.
The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby
Said improvement
Vandervork Avenue where said
Motion for adoption of the
on rollcall there were four
ATTEST: Mayor
BIDS AWARRED FOR VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS. Mr. Hyde presented tabulation of
five bids received in response to Advertisement for Bids in the Edina Sun
and in the Construction,h%letin on August 1 and 8, 1968, for Watermain
Improvement 232 and Storm Sewer Improvements 115 and 116 (Proposal A).
Tabulation showed Northern Contracting Company low bidder at $43,701.80,
Peter Lametti Construction Company second low bidder at $50,019.56, Nodlund
Associates, Inc., 3rd low bidder at $51,129.00 and Suburban Sewer and Water,
Inc., high bidder at $56,000.00,
Tabulation of two bids were presented for Grading and Graveling Improvement
C-96 and Watermain Improvement 229 (Proposal B).
Danens & Son, Inc., low bidder at $45,227.12 and Northern Contracting Company
high bidder at $55,487.20 as against Engineer's estimate of $74,070.50,
cilman Courtney and carried.
Fngineer's estimate was given at $41,364.00.
Tabulation showed J. A.
Coun-
PETITIONS RECEIVED.
ferred to the Engineering Department for processing by motion of Councilman
VanValkenburg, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried:
The following petitions were received and ordered re-
1.
2.
3.
Permanent Street Surfacing - Virginia Avenue between Valley View
Road and West 60th Street.,
Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb - Benton Avenue between Tingdale
Avenue and Code Avenue. .
Sanitary Sewer - West 54th Street between,Zenith Avenue and Abbott
Place.
GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT C-98 ORDERED ON 100% PETITION. .The Clerk
reported that a petition for an improvement consisting of Grading and Grav-
eling on Vandervork Avenue between Division Street and dead end had been
received in her office on August 14, 1968, signed by all owners of real
property abutting on said portion of Vandervork Avenue vis Theresa Score
and Dennis Chatterton. Said petition also requested the Council to assess
the entire cost against the property of such owners. Councilman Shaw there-
8/19/68
HEARING DATE SET FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT, Upon recommendation of Mr. Hite,
Councilman Shaw offered the following Resolution and moved dts adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING
AND
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P-BA-114
1, The Village Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report
as to the feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the form of Notice
of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements,
said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office
of the Village Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, September 16, 1968, at 7:OO p.m. in the
Edina Village Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons in-
terested in said improvements.
3.
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper
once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be
not less than three days from the date of the said meeting, and to mail notice
to all affected properties in substanially the following form:
The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
(Official. Publication)
VILLAGE OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING
AND
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
.. IMPROVEMENT NO. P-BA-114 1 EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL will meet at the Edina Village Hall on Monday, September
16, 1968, at 7:OO pa,, to consider the following proposed improvement to be-
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
The approximate cost of said improvement is estimated by the Village as set
forth below:
ESTIMATED COST
I CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING
AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING:
Josephine Ave. from south line of Lot 10,
Wilryan Ave. from W. 64th St, to I?. 66th St.
Tingdale Ave. from W. 63rd St. to FJ. 64th St,
Tingdale Ave. from V. 65th St. to W. 66th St. - Mildred Ave. from W. 63rd St. to the north line -.
West 64th St. from Josephine Ave. to Warren Ave.
West 65th St. from Highway #lo0 to Tingdale Ave.
Rolf- Ave. from W. 64th St. to middle of Lot 14,
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Permanent Street
Surfacing and Concrete Curb and Gutter listed above includes Lots 9 thru 24-incl.,
Block 2; Lots 1 thru 30 incl,, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 30 incl., Block 4; Lots 5 thru
9 incl., Lots 13, 14, and 28, Block 5; Lots 1 thru 16 incl, and Lots 20 thru 28
incl., Block 6; Lots 1 thru 9 incl,, and Lots 16 thru 24 incl., Block 9; Lots 1
thru 10 incl., and Lots 15 thru 24 incl., Block 10; Lots 1 thru 24 incl., Block 11;
Lots 1 thru 24 incl., Block 12; Lot 1 and Lots 23 and 24, Block 13; Lots 16, 17,
and 18, Block l;.Lots 13 thru 24 incl., Block 14; Lots 13 thru 24 incl., Block .15;
Lots 9 thru 24 incl., Block 17; Lots 1 thru 12 incl., Block 18; all in Normandale
2nd Addition; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Hardacker's Addn,; Lots 1 thru 7 incl.,
Block 1, Erickson's Normandale Addn.; Lots 1 thru 6 incl., Block 1, Hawkinson Addn.;
Lots 1 thru 5 incl., Block 1, Hirsch Bros. 1st Addn.; Lots 1 thru 16 incl., Block 1,
Donna Dells Addn.; Lots 1 thru 16 incl., Orrin E. Thompson's Edina Addn.; Lots 1,
2, 3, and 4, C. G. Carlson's Rearrangement of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4*, Block 5, Normandale
2nd Addn,,
Block 2, Normandale 2nd Addition to West 66th St.
of Lot 14, Block 10, Normandale 2nd Addn.
Block 11, Normandale 2nd Addition $177,596.62
Florence Hallberg
Village Clerk
Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seco
rol"lcal1 there were four ayes and no mays and
ATTEST: > jbB. ?!lu&i,
.Village Clerk
8/19/68
ST. PATRICK'S ADDIT1ON"PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL hearing date set for Sept-
ember 16, 1968, by motion of Councilman'VanValkenburg, seconded by Council-
man Courtney and carried.
R-3 DISTRICT AMENDMENT HEARING DATE SET for October 7, 1968, by motion of
Councilman Courtney, seconded"by-Councilman Shaw and carried.
LOT 10, BLOCK 1, HILLDALE, GULBRANSON DIVISION, LOT DIVISION HEARING DATE SET.
Upon motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried,
ision was set for October 7, 1968.
HEARING DATES SET FOR VARIOUS ASSESSMENT HEARINGS.
of Mr. Dalen, Councilman Shaw offered the following resolution setting hear-
ing dates for numerous.assessments and moved its adoption:
-hearing date for the division of Lot 10, Block 1, Hilldale, Gulbranson Div-
Upon the recommendation
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS NOS. 212, 214, 215, 216, 221, SANITARY
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. 255 AND 259, STORM SEWER IWROVEMENTS
NOS. 92, 100, 101, 102, 107, 109, 103, STREET IMPROVEMENTS NOS.
BA-70, BA-112, E-21, AND STREET OILING FOR 1968
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edins, Minnesota, as
follows E.
1.
for the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing forms hereinafter re-
corded, and the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots,
places and parcels of land within the districts affected by said improvements,
and said proposed assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are
hereby approved and the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and
open to public inspection pending hearings thereon as herein provided.
2.
Hearing forms hereinafter contained, to pass iipon said proposed assessments
and the Clerk's action in publishing notices of said hearings in the official
newspaper in accordance with law is hereby approved.
The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper"amounts to be assessed
This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of
Notices being as follows:
(Official Publication) . '
VILLAGE OF EDINA
mNNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT FOR
Watermain No. 224, 215, 216, 221
Sanitary Sewer No. -255, "259
Storm Sewer No. 92, 100, 101, 102, 107, 109
Street Improvement No. BA-70, BA-112, E-21, E-24
THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL will meet' on Monday, September 9, 1968, at 7:OO -- p.m. to hear and pass upon all oEjections, if any; to the following proposed
assessments. These assessments are'now on file in the office of the Village
Clerk and open to'public inspection.
equal installments over a period of ten (10) years.
assessment will be payable with the taxes for the year 1968, collectible in
1969, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5% per annum
from the date-of the resolution levying the assgssgent to December 31, 1969.
To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the same rate for
onii! year on all unpaid installments. The owner of the property assessgd for
the following improvements may pay the whole of the assessment without inter-
est to the Village Treasurer on or before.December 15, 1968, or make payment
with accrued interest to the County Treasurer.
1. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN NO. 214
' 12" WATERMAIN
Assessments will be payable in ten
First payment of each
.. --
c t
Mark Terrace Drive from West line of Braemar's Bill-A-Way
Addition to Valley View Road
Valley View Road from proposed Mark Terrace Drive
(1000' South of Dakota Trail) to east line of County Road No. 18
County Road NO. 18 from West Trail to Indian Hills Road
Indian Hills Road from County Road No. 18 to Margaret's Lane
Margaret's Lane from Indian Hifls -Road to Post Lane
Hwy. 11169-212 from Post Lane-to north line of County Road No. 62
6" WATERMAIN
Post Lane from Margaret's Lane to cul-de-sac
Indian Hills Road from Margaret's Lane to 300' west of Arrowhead Pass
Iroquois Trail from West Trail' to Indi*an Hills RQad
Iroquois Circle and easement - 150' south of Mohawk
Trail to Paiute Drive
Post Lane from Margaret's Lane 60 Hwy. V169-212 7.
t
I 2.8.8
8/19/68
West Trail from Iroquo-s Trail. to County Roal No.
Samuel Road from County Road No. 18 to Sally Lane
Sioux Trail from County Road No. 18 to Sally Lane -
8
Sally Lane from Valley-View Road to north Line 'of Ker-Mil Heights
Paiute Drive from Sally Lane to Paiute Pass
Paiute Circle from Paiute Drive to cul-de-sac
Paiute Pass' from Paiute Drive to Sally Lane
County Road No, 18 from Valley View Road to West Trail
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above improve-
-
. Comanche Court
- ment include:
Lot 7 (Parcels iC.1725, 1735); W 417 'ft of S 435.5 ft of Lot 8, except
Hwy; N f of Lot 9 except Hwy, Auditor's Subdivision #196; Lots 7 thru
12, Block 8; Lots 2" thru 6, Block 9; Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills
Addition; Lots 1 thru 13, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2, Iroquois
Hills; Lots 1 thru 13, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2, Iroquois Hills
2nd; Lots 1 thru 16, Block 1, Iroquois Hills 3rd; Lots 1 thru 8, Block
1; Outlot 2, Iroquois Hills 4th; Lots 1"and 2, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 8,
Bbck 2, Ker-Mil Heights; Lots 1 thru 13, Blbck 3; Lots 1 thru 7, Block
4; Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Ker-Mil Heights; Lot 5, McCauley Heights 1st;
Lots 1 and 2, McCauley Heights 2nd; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, McCauley
Heights - Halla Replat; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2;
Lots 1 thru 3, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 2, Block 4; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 5,
McCauley Heights 3rd; Pt of Lot 1 (Parcel 1080), Block 1; Lots 3 thiu
5, Block 1, Muir Woods; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2,
Naas Lakeside; Tract A, Registered Land Survey ikl246; Lots 1 thru 7,
Block 1; Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2, Sioux Trail; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1;
Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 3, Sioux Trail 2nd; Lots
1 thru 7, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, Sioux Trail 3rd; Lots 1 thru
"13; Block I, Sioux Trail 4th
2. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN NO. 215
-
SOUTH HALF OF DISTRICT:
Commencing at a point on the west line of Sec. 7, Twp. 116, Range 21,
310 feet north of the S.W. corner of said Section; thence north along
-
the west line of said Section and the west line of Section 6, Twp. 116,
Range 21 to the intersection with the west right-of-way line of County
Road #18; thence south along the west right-of-way line of County Road
#18 to the south line of Section 7, Twp. 116, Range 21; thence west along
the south line of Sec. 7, Twp. 116, Range 21, a distance of 90 feet;
thence NWly to point of beginning. *
Commencing at S.W. corngr of Lot A, R.L.S.' #1145; thence east along
the south line of said Lot A to the S.E. corner of said Lot A; thence
south along the Sly extension of the east line of said Lot A to the
north line of the E% of the S 1/5 of the W 5/8 of the SOW. Sec. 31,
Twp. 117, Range 21; thence ept along the north line of the said E f
of the S 1/5 of the W 5/8 of the S.W & Sec. 31, Twp. 117, Range '21 to
the N.E. corner of said Parcel; thence south along the east line of
the said Parcel to the north right-of-way line of Hwy. fC.169-212; thence
south along said right-of-way line to the north line of Roushar Road;
thence west along the north line of Roushar Road to the proposed right-
of-way line of new County Road #18; thence NWly and Nly along the
proposed right-of-way line of new County Road #18 to point of beginning.
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above improvement
include:
Parcels fC.1400, 1600, 1800, Sec. 31, Twp.'ll7, Range 21; Parcel 3020, Aud.
Sub. iC.196; Outlot 1 (Parcels fC.7525, 7550) Sioux Trail; Tracts A, B, C, D,
and E, Registergd-Land Survey #1253.
Shannon Drive from Dewey Hill Road to Lee Valley Road
Lee Valley Road from Shannon Drive to Down Road
Down Road from Lee Valley Road to Wexford Road
Wexford Road from Kerry Road to'cul-de-sac
Kerry Road from Dublin Road to cul-de-sac
Tralee Drive from Lee Valiey Road to cul-de-sac
Dublin Road from Kerry Road to Antrim Road
Antrim Road from Dublin Road to West 70th Street
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above improve-
ment include: Parcel 1520, Sec. 8, Twp, 116, Range 21; Lot 3, Block 1; Lots
3 thru 5, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, BlockJ, Fjeldheim 2nd; Lots land 2, Block
1, Knollview; Lot 2, Block 1, A1 Peterson Addition; Lots 2, 3, 6 thru 15
. NORTH HALF OF DISTRICT:
..
.
*
-
Parcels fC.619, 630; 1540, 1550, Sec. 7, Twp. 116, Range 21;
3. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN NO. 216
4.
5.
6.
7.
8/19/68
Prospect Hills; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 thru
6, Block 3, Prospect Hills 2nd; Lot 1, Block I, Prospect Hills 3rd; Lots
1 and 2, Block 1, Schey's Parkview 2nd
CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN NO. 221
Cahill Road from West 78th Street to Dewey Hill Road
The Lots or Tracts of Land proposed to be assessed for the above improve-
ment include:
520, 730, 735, 770, Sec. 8, Twp. 116, Range 21
CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER NO. 255
Shannon Drive from Dewey Hill Road to Lee Valley Road
Lee Valley Road from Shannon Drive to Down Road
Tralee Drive from Lee Valley Road to west line of Prospect Hills
Dublin Road from Kerry Road to Antrim Road
Antrim Road from Dublin Road to south line of A1 Petersen Addition
Kerry Road from Wexford Road to cul-de-sac
Wexford Road from Kerry Road to cul-de-sac
Gleason Road from Schey Drive to north line of Schey's Park View
On an easement line from Gleason Road to Wexford Road
Down Road from Lee Valley Road to Wexford Road
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above improve-
ment include: Parcel 81520, Sec. 8, Twp. 116, Range 21; Lot 3, Block 1;
Lots 3 thru 5, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Fjeldheim 2nd; Lots 1
and 2, Block 1, Knollview Addition; Lots 2, 3, 6 thru 15, Prospect Hills;
Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 3,
Prospect Hills 2nd; Lot 1, Block 1, Prospect Hills 3rd; Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1, Schey's Parkview 2nd; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1, Outlot 1, Schey's
Parkview 3rd
CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER NO. 259
Cahill Road from West 78th Street to Dewey Hill Road
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above improve-
ment include: Parcels #510, 520, 730, 735, 770, Sec. 8, Twp. 116, Range
21; Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Edina Interchange;
CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. 92
Storm water storage pond, Kides and Outlet Structure to be constr.ucted
in R.L.S. NO, 938, R.L.S. No. 1050, and Outlot 1, Bertelsen Addition.
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above improve-
ment are within the boundaries described below:
Beginning at a point on the south line of Tract "O", R.L.S. No. 1129,
which point is 100 feet west of the center line of France Ave.; thence
west to a point on the west line of Tract M, R.L.S. No. 1129, which point
is 330 feet south of the center line of W. 76th St.; thence southwesterly
to a point which is 480 feet east of the west line of Tract C, R.L.S. No.
990 and 250 feet north of the north line extended of TJ 77th St.; thence
west, parallel to and 250 feet north of the north line of W. 77th St. and
its extension to'the east line of Tract S, R.L.S. No. 1050; thence north-
westerly to the southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3, Lake Edina 3rd Addition;
thence northerly along the west line of said Lot 1 to a ppint 50 feet south
of the south line of West Shore Drive; thence northeasterly parallel to
and 50 feet southerly and southeasterly of the south line of West Shore
Drive to a point 50 feet from the south line of Sedum Lane; thence north-
westerly to the intersection of West Shore Drive and Sedum Lane; thence
northeasterly to a point in Lot 1, Block 4, Lake Edina 3rd Addition;
which point is 50 feet north of the south line of said Lot 1, and 50
feet east of the west line of said Lot 1; thence northerly, parallel to
and 50 feet easterly of the east line of West Shore Drive to a point which
is 400 feet south of the north line of Lake Edina 4th Addition; thence
east, parallel to and 400 feet south of the north line of Lake Edina 4th
Addition to the west line of Kellogg Ave., thence north along said west
line a distance of 200 feet; thence east to.a point on the west line of
Outlot 2, Bertelsen Addition, which point is 200 feet south of the north-
west corner of said Outlot 2; thence east to.the southeast corner of Lot
10, Block 1, South Garden Estates 4th Addition; thence north along the
east line of Block 1, Sou!h,Garden Estates 4th Addition aed Block 3, South
Garden Estates 3rd Addition, to a point 80 feet south of the center line
of iJ 72nd Street; thence east, 80 feet south of and parallel to the center
line of W72nd St. to a point 100 feet west of the center line of France
Ave.; thence south, parallel to and 100 feet west of the center line of
France Avenue to the Doint of beginning..
Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Edina Interchange; Parcels #510,
2nd Addition
3rd .Addition
8/19/68
The above description describes the Lots or Tracts of land listed below:
Parcels #5000, 5410, 5425, 5430, Sec. 31, Twp. 28, Range 24; Lots 1 thru,
11, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 2; Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Outlots 1 and
2, Bertelsen Addition; Lots 1 thru 13, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 4, Lake.
Edina 3rd; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 7 thru 13, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 7,
Brock 3; Lots 3 thru 8, Block 4, Lake Edina 4th; Tract A, Reg. Land Survey
#938; Tracts R & S, Reg. Land Survey #1050; Tracts A, B, Cy D, E, F, G, H, I,
J,. K, L, M, N, 0, Reg. Land Survey 111129; Tracts Aj By C, D, tE, F, G, H, I,
J, K, L, Reg. Land Survey #1218
8, CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. 100 - 101 - 102
Storm Water Storage Pond, Ditch, Storm Sewer along south Edina limits
from France Avenue to Computer Avenue
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Storm
Sewer, Outfall Ditch, Storage Pond and Outlet Structure includes all
lots and tracts of land within the follawing described boundaries:
Beginning at a point on the south corporate limits of the Village of
Edina, which point is 100 feet: east of the southwest corner of Tract I,
R.L.S. No, 1050; thence north to a point which is 100 feet east of the
west line and 100 feet south of the north line of Tract J, R.L.S. No.-
1050; thence east to a point in the east line of said Tract J, which
point is 100 feet south of the north line of said Tract J; thence north
to the northeast corner of said Tract J; thence northerly to the south-
west corner of Tract Q, R,L;S. No. 1050; thence north along the west
line of said Tract Q, a distance of 250 feet; thence east, parallel to
and 250 feet north of the north line of W. 77th Street and its extension,
. to a point which is 480 feet east of the west line of Tract Cy R.L.S. No,
990; thence northeasterly to a point on the east line of said Tract C,
which point is 330 feet south of the center line of West 76th Street.;
thence east, parallel to and 330 feet south of the center line of 14.
76th St. to a point 100 feet west of the east line of Sec. 31, Twp, 28,
Range 24; thence
said Sec. 31, which point is 100 feet west of the east line of said
Seo. 31p thence.east to a point on the north line of the south 3 of
Sec, 32, Twp. 28, Range 24, which point is 1100 feet east of the west
line of said Sec. 32; thence north, parallel to the west line of said -
Sec. 32; a distance of 70 feet; thence east to a point on the west line
of the west 15 acres of the SE & of the4NJ t of said See. 32, which
point is 70 feet north of the south line of said west 15 acres; thence
northeasterly to a point which is 200 feet north of the south line of
said west~15. acres and 200 feet west of the east line of said west 15
acres; thence southeasterly to a point on the east line of said west
15 acres; which point-is 100 feet north of the southeast corner of said
west 15 acres; thence southwesterly to a point on the south 1ine.of said
west. 15. acres, which point is 100 feetwest of the southeast corner of
said west 15 acres; thence southerly to a point on the north line of
West 76th-St., which point is 210 feet west of the east line of the west % of the NE of1 the SW of said Sec. 32; thence southeasterly to a
point on the west line of the east 358.88 feet of the SE
of said Sec. 32, which point is 250 feet south of the center line of
West 76th St.; thence south along said west line of the east 358.88
feet a distance of 245 feet; thence southwesterly to a point on the south
line of Sec. 32, Twp, 28, Range 24, which point is 715 feet west of the
south % corner of said Sec. 32; thence west to the southwest corner of
said Sec. 32; thence west to the point of beginning.
The above description describes the Lots or Tracts of: land listed below:
Tracts I, J, K, N 229.6 feet of L, S 200 feet of L & M, N 229.6 feet of
M, N, 0, P, Reg, Land Survey #1050; Tracts M, N, P, Q, R, S, T, U, Reg.
Land Survey V1129; Tracts A, B, C, D, E, F, G, J, K, L, M, N, 0, P, Q,
R, S, Reg. Land Survey 81218
Tracts E, F, L, 0, Reg, LandaSurvey #1129
Parcel 5000, Sec, 31, Twp. 28, Range 24
8800, 9200, See. 32, Twp, 28, Range 24
Storm Sewer (Area C)
C.S.A.H. No. 17 (France Avenue) between F.A.1, #494 and West 69th Street
(Hennepin County Project 6311) I
Beginning at a point on the south line of Sec, 31, TIT. 28, Range 24,
which point is 100 feet west of the east line of said Sec. 31; thence
north to a point on the north line of the south t of said Sec, 31; which
point is 100 feet west of the-east line of said Sec. 31; thence east to
north to a point on the north line of the south % of
.
-
of the SW % .
I - Parcels 420, 2800, 3200, 4800, 5300, 5450, 5500, 6000, 6400, 6800, 8000,
I
v3
€-
a point on the nort
8/19/68
ine of the south % o Sec. 32, Twp. 28, Range 24,.
which point is 1100 feet east of the west line of said Sec. 32; thence
north, parallel to the west line of said Sec. 32, a distance of 70 feet;
thence east to a point on the west line of the west 15 acres of the SE
% of the NW f of said Sec. 32, which point is 70 feet north of the south
line of said west 15 acres; thence northeasterly to a point which is 200
feet north of the south line of said west 15 acres and 200 feet west of
the east line of said west 15 acres; thence southeasterly to a point on
the east line of said west 15 acres, which point is 100 feet north of
the southeast corner of said west 15 acres; thence southwesterly to a
point on the south line of said west 15 acres, which point is 100 feet
west of the southeast corner of said west 15 acres; thence southerly
to a point on the north line of West 76th Street, which point is 2.10
feet west of the east line of the west % of the NE .t; of the SW % of
said Sec. 32; thence southeasterly to a point on the west line of the
east 358.88 feet of the SE kcof the SW % of said Sec. 32, which point
is 250 feet south of the center line,of West 76th Street; thence south
along said west line of the east 358.88 feet a distance of 245 feet; *
thence southwesterly to a point on the south line of Sec. 32, Twp. 28,
Range 24, which point is 715 feet west of the south f corner of said
Sec. 32; thence west to the southwest corner of said Sec. 32; thence
west to the point of beginning.
9. CONSTRUCTION OF*STORM SEWER NO. 107
West 77th Street through an easement south to pond
The lots or tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above im-
provement include:
Tracts A, B, C, D, E, F, N, 0, P, Q, R, S, Reg. Land Survey #1218;
Tracts J, K, N229.6' of Tract L, M, N, 0, P, R, Reg. Land-Survey fl050
Bush Lake Road fromaDewey Hill Road to existing ditch at-northeast
corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Edina Interchange 2nd Addition
On a'drainage easement from existing culvert under Mpls., Northfield
& Southern Railroad, around the north and east side of the Plat to the
northeast corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Edina Interchange 2nd Addition
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above im-
provement include:
Lots 1, 2, 4, Block 1, Edina Interchange 2nd Addition, 1st Replat; Lot
3, Block 1, Edina Interfhange 2nd Addition
West 70th Street (County Road V28) between Cahill Road and 230 feet,
plus or minus, east of Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railroad
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above im-
provement include:
Outlot 1 (Parcel 7010), Otto's 2nd Addition; Outlot 2 (Parcel 7200),
Fellman's; Parcel #2815, Sec. 5, Twp. 116, Range 21; Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1, Amundson's Terrace; Parcels %2915, 2920, 2310, Sec. 8, Twp.
116, Range 21
Cahill Road from 141.37 feet north of south line of R.L.S. t1193 to
West 78th Street
Dewey Hill Road from Bush Lake Road to Cahill Road
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above im-
provement include:
Parcels Jk160, 170, 225, 231, 510, 520, 730, 735, 770, 1300, Sec. 8,
Twp. 116, Range 21; Lot 1, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Edina Inter-
change Center; Lot 4, Block 1, Edina Interchange Center 2nd Addition,
1st Replat; Tract C; Reg. Land Survey C1193
France Avenue from West 69th Street to South Village Limits
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for the above im-
provement include:
Lot 1, Block 1, South Office Park 1st Addition; Lot 2, Block 1, Re-
plat of Lot 2, Block 1, South Office Park 1st Addition; Tract A, Reg.
Land Survey #1171; Tract A, Reg. Land Survey #677; Lot 1, Block 1
(Parcel 150) Stow's Edgemoor; Lot 1, Block 8, Stow's Edgemoor; Lot 1,
Block 1 (Parcel 2010), Stow's Edgemoor Addition Block 9 Replat; Lot 2,
Block 1 (Parcel 4010), Stow's Edgemoor Addition Block 9 Replat; Parcel
3235, Sec. 30, Twp. 28, Range 24; Parcels #415, 420, 2800, 4800, Sec. 32,
Twp. 28, Range 24; Parcel-s #5000, 5410, 5425, Sec. 31, Twp. 28, Range 26,
Tracts E, F, L, 0, P, Q, R, S, T, Reg. Land Survey f1129
.
-
10. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. 109 *
11. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-70
12. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-112
13. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT E-21
8/19/68
14. CONSTRUCTION,OF STREET IMPROVEMENT E-24
Amundson Avenue from Cahill Road to West 70th Street
The Lots or Tracts of l-and proposed to be assessed for the above im-
provement include:
Tracts A, B, (Parcel 6010), B (Parcel 6020), Reg. Land Survey 111193;
Lot 2, Block 1; Lot 1 (Parcel 9030), Block 2; Lot 1 (Parcel 9050),
Block 2, Amundson's Terrace; Parcel 2915, Sec, 8, Bv. 16, Range 21
BY ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Florence B. Hallberg
Village Clerk I (Official Publication)
VILLAGE OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT FOR
Storm Sewer No. 103
THE EDINA VILLAGE COU?lCIL will meet on Monday, September 9, 1968,*at 7:OO p.m.
to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the following proposed assess-
ment. This assessment is now on file-in the office of the Village Clerk and
open to public inspection.
installments over a period of twenty (20) years.
ment will be payable with the taxes for the year 1968, collectible in 1969, with
interest on the entire assessment at the ra;e of 5% per annum from the date of
the resolution 2evying the assessment to December 31, 1969. To each &sequent
installment will be added interest at the same rate for one year on all unpaid
installments,
may pay the whole of the assessment without interest to the Village Treasurer
on or before December 15, 1968, pr make payment with accrued interest to the
County Treasurer.
This assessment will be payable in twenty equal
First payment of this assess-
The owner of the property assessed for the following improvement
1. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. io3 .
Maloney Ave. from County Road 1/18 to Jackson Ave.
Belmore Lane from County #18 to Monroe Ave..
Second Street South from Jackson Avenue to Harrison Avenue
Harrison Avenue from 2nd Street South to 310 feet south
Easement line from Harrison Avenue east to alley
Alley between Harrison Avenue and Tyler Avenue from easement line south
of 2nd Street South to Belmore Lane
Griffit Street from Spruce Road to 420 feet south
Easement line from Griffit Street to pind
Spruce Road from 200 feet east of Griffit Street to Griffit Street
Blake Road from Maloney Avenue to Belmore Lane
Belmore Lane from Blake Road to Griffit Street
Griffit Street from Belmore Lane to south line of Lot 2, Block 14,
Easement line along Lot 2, Block 14, Mendelssohn Addition to 150' west
Blake Road from 250 feet north ?f Belmore Lane to north line of Lot 2,
North liie of Lot 2, Block 5, Mendelssohn Addition from Blake Road to
Center linq qf ,vacated alley, Block 5, Mendelssohn Addition from Sprude
Spruce Road from vacated alley to John Street
John Street from Spruce Road to Belmore Lane
Belmore Lane from John Street to 160 feet west
EaseFent line along the east line of Lots 11 & 12,)3lock 12, Mendelssohn
Easement from pond in the north + of Block 9, Mendelssohn Addition to pond
Easement line from point in east line of Lot 1, Block 1, Replat of Blqck
,
Mendelssohn Addition
'Block 5, Mendelssohn Addition
Center line of vacated alley
Road to north line of Lot 2, Block 5, Mendelssohn
Addifian from Belmore Lane to 15 feet north of south line of said Lot 11
in south 4 of block 9, Mendelssohn Addition
Block 22, Mendelssohn Addition northeasterly to pond at Maloney Ave.
extended
Easement line from Grove Place to Belmore Lane
Be.lmore Lane from John Street 500' east to pond
John Street from Maloney Avenue north to cul-de-sac
The Lots or Tracts of land proposed Go be assessed for the above improve-
ment shall include all lots or tracts of land within the following
described boundaries:
,
Commencing at a point on the west line of Section 30, Twp. 117, Range
21, said point being 50 feet south of the northwest corner of said Section; thence
south 'along the riest line of said Section 30, Twp. 117, Range 21, t-o th-e south
~ line of Maloney Ave, extinded west; thence east along the south line of Maloney
8/19/68 I
\;"
m
Ave. to a point on the south line of Maloney Ave., said point being 170 feet
east of the east line of Adams Ave. extended; thence southeasterly at an
interior angle of 241' and a distance o.f 75 feet; thence southeasterly at
an interior angle of 143O and a distance of 1260 feet; thence northeasterly
at an interior angle of 72O and a distance of 585 feet; thence northeasterly
to a point on the south line of Lot 13, Block 14, West Minneapolis Heights,
said point being 35 feet west of the southeast corner thereof; thence north-
erly to a point in the east line of Lot 6, Block 14, West Minneapolis Heights,
which point is 22 feet south of the norkheast corner of said Lot 6; thence
northeasterly to the southwest corner of Lot 25, Block 15 West Minneapolis
#eights; thence northeasterly to a point in the north line of said Lot 25,
which point is 60 feet east of the northwest corner of said Lot 25; thence
southeasterly to the southeast corner of Lot 2, said Block 15; thence north-
erly to the southeast corner of Lot 13, Block 2, West Minneapolis Heights;
thence easterly along the north line of Belmore Lane to a point in the south
line of Lot 5, Block 2, Mendelssohn, which point is 35 feet east of the
southwest corner of said Lot 5,; thence northwesterly to the intersection of
extended east line of Pearborn Street and the.north line of Spruce Road;
thence north along the extended east line of Dearborn Ave. to the north
line of Section 30, Twp. 117, Range 21; thence west along said north line
of said Section 30 to the east line of Outlot 1, Trolley Line Addition;
thence north to the northeast corner of said Outlot 1 thence west along the
north line of said Outlot 1 and the center line of Second Street South to
the center line of Monroe Ave.; thence south along the center line of Monroe
Ave. to the center line of Third Street South; thence west along the center
line of Third Street to point of beginning.
Commencing at a point on the north line of Spruce Ave., said point being the
northerly extension of the east line of Dearborn St.; thence southeasterly .
to a point on the south line of Lot 5, Block 2, Mendelssohn Addition, said
point being 35 feet east of the southwest corner thereof; thence southwesterly
to a point on the north line of Lot 1, Steiner and Koppelman's 1st Addition,
said point being 30 feet west of the northeast corner thereof; thence south-
easterly to the southeast corner of Lot 3, Steiner.and Koppelman's 1st Addn.;
thence southerly to the northeast corner of Lot 5, Steiner and Koppelman's
1st Addition; thence east to a point 80 feet east of the northeast corner of
said Lot 5 and 100 feet north of the north line of Maloney Ave; thence south-
easterly to a point on the north line of Maloney Ave., said point being 515
feet west of the west line of Griffit St.; thence east along the north line
of Maloney Ave. to a point 150 feet west of the west line of Griffit St.;
thence southwesterly to a point $n Lot 1, Block 2, Mendelssohn Heights, said
point being 30 feet south of the south line of Maloney Ave. and 55 feet east
of the west line of said Lot 1, Block 2, Mendelssohn Heights; thence east 30
feet south of and parallel to the south line of Maloney Ave. to a point on
the east line of Mendelssohn Lane; thence southeasterly to the southeast cor-
ner of Lot 1, Block 1, Mendelssohn Heights; thence easterly to a point in
Block 1, Ascension Addition, said point being 100 feet south of the south line
of Maloney Ave. and 50 feet west of the west line of Blake Road; thence south-
easterly to the southeast corner of Lot 7, Block 1, Mendelssohn Heights; thence
southeasterly to the southwest corner of Lot 4, Block 1, Victorsen's Inter-
lachen; thence northeasterly to a point in said Lot 4, which point is 70 feet
east of the west line and 40 feet north of the south line of said Lot 4; thence
southeasterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 4, which point is 5 feet
north of the southeast corner of said Lot 4; thence northeasterly to a point
in Lot 5, Block 1, Victorsen's Interlachen, which point is 10 feet west of tk
east line and 20 feet north of the south line of said Lot 5; thence southeast-
erly to the southeast corner of said Lot 5; thence easterly along the north
line of Waterman Ave. to the soythwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Replat of
part of Block 22, Mendelssohn; thence northeasterly to a point on the east line
of Lot 2, Block 1, Mendelssohn - Sorenson Replat, which point is 45 feet north
of the southeast corner of said Lot 2; thence northeasterly to a point in
Block 23, Mendelssohn, which point is 55 feet east of the west line and 16.5
feet north of the south line of said Block 23; thence east, parallel to the
south line of Block 23, a distance of 60 feet; thence south, parallel to the
west line of said Block 23, a distance of 80 feet;.thence east, parallel to
the south line of said Block 23, to a point 50 feet west of the east line of'
said Block 23; thence southeaeterly to the southeast corner of said Block 23;
thence northeasterly to a point on the east line of Section 30, Twp. 117,
Range 21, said point being 55 feet north of the north line of Waterman Ave.
extended; thence easterly and perpendicular to the east line of Section 30,
\ 8/19/68
Twp. 117, Range 21, a distance of 100 feet; thence northwesterly to a point
on the east line of Section 30, Twp. 117, Range 21, said point being 205 feet
north of the north line of Waterman Ave. extended; thence along said east
line to the center line of Malo'ney Ave, extended; thence northeasterly to a
point in Lot 2, Auditor's Sub-Division No. 248, said point being 150 feet
south of the south line of Belmore Lane extended and 55 feet east of the east
line of Section 30, Twp. 117, Range 21; thence northwesterly to the
intersection of said east line of Sec. 30 and the center line of Belmore
Lane; thence northerly to a point on the east line of Lot 1, Wilhoit's
Addition, said point being 30 feet north of the southeast corner of said
Lot L; thence westerly, parallel to the south line of said Lot 1, to the
west line of said Lot 1; thence north along said West line, a distance of
95 feet; thence westerly, perpendicular to said west line of Lot 1, a distance
of 20 feet; thence northerly, parallel to said west line and its northerly
extension, to a point 40 feet north of the south line of Lot 9, Block 7,
Mendelssohn; thence northeasterly to the intersection of the north line of
Spruce Road and the east line of Section 30, Twp. 117, Range 21; thence west
along the north line of Spruce Rd. to point of beginning.
BY ORDER OF TFJE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Florence B. Hallberg
Village Clerk
(Official Publication)
VILLAGE OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT FOR
STREET OILING 1968
TKE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL :?will meet on Monday, September 9, 1968, at 7:OO p.m.
to hear and pass upon alLobjections, if any, to the following proposed assess-
ment.
to public inspection,
collectiljk in 1969, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5% per
annum. The owner of the property assessed for the following improvement may pay
the-whole of the assessment without interest to the Village Treasurer on or before
December 15, 1968, or make payment with accured interest to the County Treasurer..
1. Street Oiling - 1968
This assessment is now on file in the office of the Village Clerk and open
Assessment will be payable with the taxes for the year 1968
.
Virginia Avenue between West 62nd Street and Crosstown Highway
Sherwood Avenue between West 65th Street and West 66th Street
Dale Avenue between Vest 56th Street and West 57th Street
West 62nd Street between Tracy Avenue and Olinger Blvd, extended
Parcels #5030, 5050, 5060, 5070, Sec. 32, Twp, 117, Range 21; Lots 1
The lots or Tracts of land proposed to be assessed for theabove-improvement
include:
and 2, Block 1, Countryside; Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Countryside Addition, Zuehlke
Replat; Lot 1, Block 1, Replat of Block.9, Normandale; Lots 11 and 12, Block 1,
Replat of Block lO,.Normandale; TJ 90' of Lot 1; W f of Lots 2 thru 5, Block 1;
E % of Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2; Normandale; Lots 1 and 2, Block I, Normandale
Haverly Replat; La 1 and 2, Block 1, Normandale Haverly Replat; Lots 1 and 3,
Block 1, Normandale Miller Replat; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, Wilrob Addition; Lots
3-and 4, Block 16; N 60' of Lot 5, Block 16; S 61.33' of Lot 5, Block 16; W 5
of Lots 1 and 2, Block 17; Lot 3, Block 17, Normandale; Lot 2, Block 5, Melody
Knolls 3rd; Lots 1 thru-5, Block 1: Lots 1 thru 6, Block 3, Melody Knolls 6th
BY ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL
Florence B, Hallberg
Village Clerk
(Official Publication)
VILLAGE OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT FOR
Watermain No. 212
-
THE EDINAVILLAGE COUNCIL will meet on Monday, September 16, 1968, at 7:OO p.m.
to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the following proposed assessments,
which are now on file in the office of the Village Clerk and open to public inspec-
tion. Assessments will be payable in ten equal installments over a period of ten
(10) years.
the year 1968, collectible in 1969, with interest on the entire assessment at the
rate of 5% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to
December 31, 1969.
same rate for one year on all unpaid installments.
assessed foz the following improvements may pay the whole of the assessment without
intezest to the Village Treasurer on or before December 15, 1968, or make payment
with accrued interest to the County Treasurer.
I First payment of each assessment will be payable with the taxes for
To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the
The owner of the property
i 8/19/68
CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN NO. 212
12" WATERMAIN
Highwood Drive and West Highwood Drive from Hwy. V169 *to Pine Grove Road
Pine Grove Road from West Highwood Drive to Blake Road
Blake Road from Pine Grove Road to Trrterlachen Road
Interlachen Road from Blake Road to Ridge Road North
Ridge Road from Interlachen Blvd. to cul-de-sac; thence
Northerly along easement between L-ots 1 and 9, B1;ck 1,
Schwantes Addition to Waterman Ave. and Arthur Streets
6" WATERMAIN
Blake Road from Jeffrey Lane to Pine Grove Road
Highwood Drive from 500 feet North of Hwy. #169-212 to West Highwood Drive
Kaymar Drive
Jeffrey Lane from Blake Road to Leslee Lane
Lesslee Lane
Saxony Road
Idylwood Drive
Pine Grove Road from West Highwood Drive to 950 feet east
West Highwood Drive from Pine Grove Road to North line of Idylwood 4th Addn.
Evanswood Lane
On an easement line from Leslee Lane to Kaymar Drive
LATERAL DISTRICT
The Lots and Tracts of landaproposed to be assessed, abutting the above
described pipe are as follows:
1; Lots 1 thru 4,.Block 2, Les Anderson's Highwood; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1;
Lots 1 thru 8, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Highwood Addition to Edina
Highlands; Lots 1 thru 18, Block 1, Les Anderson's Highwood Second Addition;
Parcels #6275, 7500, 8000, 8300, 8610, 8650, 9400, 9600, 9800, Auditor's
Sub. #325; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 2, Brownswood Addition; Lot
1, Block 1, Carson's Hill; Parcels #1016, 9010, 9020, El Rancho; Lots 1
thru 5, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2, Evanswood; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1;
Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3, Idylwood; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1;
Lots 1 thru 3, Block 2, Idylwood 2nd; Lot 1 (N of S 125'), Block 1; Lots
2 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Idylwood
3rd; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lots 6 thru 9, Block 1; Idylwood Fourth; Lots
1 thru 5, Block.1, Idylwood Fifth; Lots land 2 Block 1; Lots 1 thru 6,
Block 2, Idylwood Sixth; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, Jones Knolls; Lot 1,
Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 3, Luce Highwood;
Lot 1, Mirror Lake Ridge; Lot 2, Block 1, Mirror Lake Terrace; Lots 2 and
13, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls Fifth; Lots 1 thru 4;Block 1, Replat of Lots
1, 2, 3, Block 3, Idylwood Second; Lots 1-thru 3, Block 1, Replat of Lots
3, 4, 5, Block I, Idylwood Fourth; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 1, Schwant's Addn.;
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, C. R. Strotz First; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1
thru 7, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 15, Block 3, Valley Park; Lot 2, Block I, Wayne
Terrace; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, Harold Woods Addition,
Commencing at the N.E. corner of Lot 10, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 8th Addition;
thence north along the west right-of-way line of Blake Road to the north
right-of-way lihe of 3efY~e~~E$ne,~extended; thence easterly along the north
line of Jeffrey Lane to the N.W, corner of Lot 1, Block 3, Valley Park Addition;
thence easterly along t5e south line of Les Anderson's Highwood 2nd Addition
to the S.E. corner of Lot 6, Block 1, Les Anderson's Highwood 2nd Addition;
thence NWly along the west line of West Highwood Drive to the N.E. corner of
Lot 1, Block 1, Les Anderson's Highwood Addition; thence Ely along the center
line of Highwood Drive to the east line of Lot 2, Block 1, Idylwood 2nd
Addn. extended; thence north to the N.W. corner of Lot 1, Block 1, High-
wood Addn. to Edina Highlands; thence Ely to the S.E. corner of Lot I, Block
1, Carson's HilLAddn.; thence Nly to the N.E. corner of Lot 1, Block 1,
Carson's Hill Addn.; thence Wly to the S.W. corner of Lot 9, Block 3,
Mirror Lakes Addn.; thence north, NEly and NWly along the rear lot lines of
Lots 2 thru 9 and 11 and 12-, Block 3, Mirror Lakes; thence west along an
extension of the north line of Lot 11, Block 3, Mirror Lakes to a point
768.80' east of the center line.of Blake Road; thence NWly and Nly along the
west line of Lot 3, Aud. Sub. No. 248 to the NEly corner of Lot 34, Aud.
Sub. No. 325; thence north along the east line of Sec. 30, Twp 117, R. 21
to the center line of County Road No. 20; thence Wly along the center line
of County Road No. 20 to the west line of Lot 1, Aud. Sub. No. 248 extended;
thence north, NWly and Nly along the west line of Lot 1, Aud. Sub. No. 248
to a point 293 feet south of the center line of Waterman Ave.; thence west
and parallel to Waterman Ave. to the east line of Mirror Lake V€W; thence
,. Parcels #2200, 3800, 4000, Sec. 29, Twp. 117, Range 21; Lots 1 thru 4, Block
/
f 8/19/68
north to the S.E. corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Mirror Lake View; thence Wly
along the south lines of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Mirror Lake View add-
ition to the S.W. corner of Lot 1, Block I, Mirror Lake View Adaition;
thence Nly along the west line of Lot 1, Block 1, Mirror Lake View, a distance
of 30 feet; thence Wly to the S,W. corner of Lot 2, Block 1, Conn Heights;
thence Sly to the S.E. corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Conn Heights; thence Wly
along the south line of saidLot 3 and its extension to the west line of
Blake Road; thence SWly to the N.E. corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Wayne Terrace;
thence Wly along the north lot lines of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Wayne Terrace
to the NW corner of said Lot 2; thence Nly along the west line of Block 29,
Mendelssohn to the center line of Waterman Ave.; thence Wly along the center
line of Waterman Ave. to the west line of Block 1, Schwante's Addn. Extended;
thence Sly along said V. line of Block 1, Schwante's Addn. 264' ; thence VWly
and parallel to Waterman Ave. to a point on the center line of vacated 7th
St., said point being 396' north and 330' west of center of Section; thence
Nly along the center line of vacated 7th St. a distance of 64' which point
is 460' and 330' W of center of Section; thence Wly and parallel to Waterman
Ave. extended, a distance of 330' to the center line of Van Buren Ave, ex-
tended; thence S. 460' to the south line of the NW % of Sec. 30, Twp 117,
R. 21; thence Ely along the S line of said Nw to center of Sec. 30, Twp.
117, R 21, thence Sly along the E line of the S.W. of Sec. 30, Twp 117,
R 21, to S.E. corner of the S.W f of Sec. 30, Twp 117, R, 21; thence Ely
along the N. line of Parkwood Knolls Addn, to the center line of Schaefer
Rd.; thence Sly along the center l€ne of Schaefer Road to the S. line of
Lot 1, Block 2, Parkwood,Knol$s 5th Addn. extended; thence Ely to the N,W,
corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 11th Addn., thence SEly along
rear lot lines of Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 5th Addn. to the
most Nly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 8th Addn,; thence SEly,
Sly, SWly, SEly and NEly along the rear lot lines of Lots 1 thru 12, Block
1, Parkwood Knolls 8th Addn. to the N.E. corner 'of Lot lo, Block I, Park-
wood Knolls 8th Addn. which is the point of beginning.
.
.
The Lots and Tracts of land proposed to be assessed are as follows:
Parcels 2200, 3400, 3800, 4000, and 5400 in Sec. 29, Twp 117, Range 21;
Parcels 1000, 2000, 3000, 4800, and 5200 in Sec. 30, Twp 117, Range 21;
Parcel 7000 in Sec. 32, Twp 117, Range 21; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1 and
Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2, Les Anderson's Highwaood Addn.; Lots 1 thru 18,
Block I, Les Anderson's Highwood 2nd Addn.; Lots 1 thru 7, 9, 11 thru 16,
19 thru 30, 32, 35, 36, 38, thru 41 and 45 thru 47, Aud. Sub. No. 325;
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2, Brownswood Addn.;-Lot 1, Block 1,
Carson's Hill Addn.; Lot 1, Block 1, Conn Heights; Lots 1 thru 3, Block
I, Margaret Cosgrove's Addn.; Lots 1 thru 9, El Rancho Addn.; Lots 1
thru 5, Block 1 and 1 thru 3, Block 2, Evanswood Addn,; Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1, A, W, Hendrickson's 1st Addn.; Lots .l thru 5, Block 1 and 1 thru 3,
Block 2, Hyland Acres; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, and 1 thru 4 Block 2, also
Block 3 parcel 9900, Idylwood Addn; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 3,
Block 2, Idylwdod Second; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1, ,Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, and
Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Idylwood3rd; Lots 1, 2, 6 thru 9, Block 1, Idylwood
4th; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, Idylwood 5th; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1-, Lots 1
thru 6, Block 2, Idylwood 6th; Lot 1, .Block 1, Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2 and
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 3, Luce Highwood Addn.; Parcel 8000 in Mendelssohn Addn.;
Lots 1 thru 8, Mirror Lake Ridge; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Nirror Lake Terrace;
Lots 4,, 5, and 6, Block 1, Mirror Lake View; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1, Lots 1
thru 8, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 3rd; Lots 1 thru 13, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 5,
Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 3rd; Lots 1 thru 13, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 5, Block - 2 and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Parkwood Knolls 5th; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 1,
Parkwood Knolls 6;h; Lots 1 thru 9 Block 1, Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, Parkwood
Knolls 7th; Tract A, Parcel 4000, Reg. Land Survgy No, 345; Lots 1 thru 4,
Block 1, Replat of Lcts 1, 2, 3, Block 3, Idylwood 2nd; Lots 1 thru 3, Block
1, Replat of Lots 3, 4, & 5, Block I, Idylwood 4th; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 1,
Schwante's Addn,; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, C. R, Strotz 1st Addn.; Lots 1 and
2, Block I, Wayne Terrace; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2,
Wsstkood Court; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, Harold Woods; Lots 1 and 2, Block I,
Harold Woods Second Addn.
BY ORDER OF THE VILLAGE COUNCIL
'
Florence B. Hallberg
. Village Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution
four ayes-and no nays and the
Mayor ATTEST :
Village Clerk 0
8/19/68
n TRACY AVENUE SPEED CONTROL PROBLEM STUDIED. ,ir. Hyde recalled that a letter
from Mr. William G. McFadzean protesting the speed of traffic on Tracy Avenue
between Grove Street and the Crosstown Highway had been referred to the Traffic
Gafety Committee. *He advised that the Committee has recommended installation
of 25 mile per hour suggestive sign face plates mounted on existing curve signs;
double yellow striping curve areas, and the painting of one crosswalk at Hill-
side Road and Tracy Avenue.
had met with the petitioners.
for residents in the immediate area.
EDEN PRAIRIE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ACCEPTED.
mitted by the Metropolitan Council relative to the Village of Eden Prairie
noting that the plan follows generally patterns of which Edina officials
have been aware. Mr. Hite pointed out that the plan provides for two inter-
changes on County Road 18 between 494 and the Crosstown Highway whereas the
Village of Edina had considered only one at Valley V5ew Road.
posed intersection would be near Braemar kna and Mr. Hite advised that he
would work with Eden Prairie in an attempt to resolve this difference. No
action was taken.
VALLEY VIEW DARI SUPERETTE OFF-SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED.
Council of a request for a transfer of an Off-sale Beer License for Valley
View Dari Superette at 4412 Valley View Road. Being advised that the app-
lication had been approved by the Health and Police Departments, Councilman
Shaw's motion approving the license was seconded by Councilman Courtney and
carried. ..
He advised thqt Captain Merfeld and George Hite
He noted that 90% of the tickets given were
Mr. Hyde presented a plan sub-
The other pro-
Mr. Hyde advised
HENNEPIN COUNTY TRAFFIC SIGNAL PARTICIPATION DISCUSSED. Mr. Hyde advised
Council that in reply to the protests of the Village relative to traffic
signal participation, Mr. Klostner of the Hennepin County Highway Department
had stated that there was a "blind spot" in the traffic .signal participation
policy and that they would advise the Village when a decision has been reackd
as to a revised policy.
COUNTY-WIDE POLICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM DISCUSSED. Mr. Hyde stated that he
had received a letter from Mr. StanL'ey R. Cowle, County Administrator, ex-
pressing concern about the cooperative development of a police communications
system that would meet the test of today's law enforcement requirements.
The Board of Hennepin County Commissioners has indicated their willingness
to underwrite a major share of the cost of a County-aide participation com-
munication system. This system will allaw two cars in different municipal-
ities to talk directly to each other when these cars are in pursuit. It is
proposed that the County will sustain the purchase of the central facility
dispatching equipment and all mobile radio units. Cost estimates for local
-dispatching equipment total $4,482.00 for each jurisdiction after Civil De-
fense credits have been applied. The County proposes to buy all of the mobile
units and maintain and replace them at $100 per unit.
pf Mayor Bredesen as to present costs, Mr. Dalen advised that the Village is
currently paying about $135.00 annually per unit and that the balance of the
cost of the system will be assessed against the Village mill. rate. Mayor
Bredesen advised that he does not object to the system itself, but suggested
the possibility of paying on a per capita basis.
look into the possibility of this type of financing.
UNCLAIMED BICYCLE SALE PROCEDURE TO BE CHANGED FOR ONE TIME ONLY.
noted that the system of auctioning unclaimed bicycles to individuals one at
a time has become costly and time consuming. He recommended that the sale
be conducted on an "all or none basis" which would be participated in by
dealers only. Councilman Shaw's motion that the sale be conducted on this
basis for one time only to see whether this method of selling the bicycles
would be satisfactory was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried.
MRS. HUGO PAULSON NOTICE OF CLAIM PRESENTED. Council was advised of a Notice
of Claim relative to an accident in vhich Mrs. Hugo Paulson fell on the side-
walk.
ant e c omp any.
In reply to a question
Mr. Hyde advised that he will
-
Mr. Hyde
The incident has been reported to the Village Attorney and the insur-
MOSOW PROPERTY IN.MUD LAKE AREA TO BE CONDEMNED.
that he had received a letter from.Mr;: Alberg-H. Newman, attorney representing
Mr. Larry MOSOW, owner of Parcel 6800, Sec. 32, T. 117, R. 21 which the Village
has been attempting to acquire as a part of the Mud Lake Porject.
Mr. Hyde advised Council
Mr. Newman
218
8/19/68 c
advised that the land has ,een.independently appra,sed and that the last offer
of the Village is rejected as not being even an approach to.the present market
value of the property,
authorizing condemnation of Parcel 6800, Sec. 32, T. 117, R. 21, and moved its
adoption: -. RESOLUTION APPROVING CONDEMNATION OF
BE IT RESOLVED ghat the Edina Village Cwncil hereby authorizes and directs the
Village Attorney to commence condemnation proceedings against Parcel 6800, Sec.
32,. T. 117, R. 21.
Councilman Shaw then offered the following resolution
PARCEL 6800, SEC. 32, T, 111, R. 21
Motion for adoption of the resolution-was
on rollcall there were four ayes and no
Councilman Courtney and
resolution,wps adopted.
-
ATTEST :
a . Village C&erk
GLEASON PROPERTY CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AUTHORIZED. Upon the recommendation
of Mr. Hyde, Councilman VanValkenburg offered the following resolution author-
izing condemnation proceedings against the property on the northeastern quadrant
of Gleason Road and the Crosstown-Highway owned by Cherokee Sales, Inc. as
f dows :
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS AGAINST
PROPERTY ON N,E. QUADWT OF WASON ROAD AND CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Village Council hereby authorizes the Village
Attorney to commence condemnation proceedings against the property described as
f 01 Lows :
That part of Lot 24, Auditor's Subdivision 196 lying in the NOW.% of .
the N.E.% of Sec. 6, T 116, R. 21 and
Motion for adoption of the resolution was
on rollcall there were four ayes
Courtney and
and no
A~EST :
Village Clerk d
LIBRARY SCUISTURE COMMISSION APPROVED. Mr. Hyde noted that a committee had
observed the unveiling of the model of the sculpture created by Mrs. Kathryn
Nash to be placed in the new Edina Library. Councilman VanValkenburg's motion
was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried expressing unanimous acceptance of
the sculpture and authorizing Mrs. Nash to proceed with the sculpture.
man Shaw suggested that a printed explanation he placed on a wall adjacent to
the sculpture which would note the representation of Edina history.
Council-
JULY 15, 1968, MINUTES CORRECTED RELATIVE TO RESOLUTIONS SETTING SPECIAL ASSESS-
MENT HEARING DATES. The Clerk noted that a clerical error was made in the Minutes
of July 15, 1968,, relative to fhe Resolutibn Providing for Special Assessment
Hearings for Sanitary Sewer Improvements 250, 252, 253, 256, 258, 260, 263, 264,
Watermain Improvements 210,. 217, 219, 220, 224, 225, Street Improvements BA-103,
BA-94, Storm Sewer Improvements 95, 103, 106, 108, 110, and 112, Councilman Van-
Valkenburg offered the following resolution and moved its adoption'.
BE IT RESOLVED that the minutes on page 145 be corrected to show that the 'fNotice
of Hearing" sent in connection with Sanitary Sewer 263 and Watermain 224 read as
follows:
the year, collectible in 1969, with interest on the entire assessment at the rate
of 6% per-annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December
31, 1969. To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the same rate
for one year on all unpaid installments,
the following improvements may pay the whole of the assessment without interest
to *he Village Treasurer on or before December 15, 1968, or make payment wdth
accrued interest to the County Treasurer." The Minutes on pages 146 and 148 should
be corrected to show that the Itnotice of Hearing" sent in connection with Sanitary
Sewers 250, 252, 253, 256, 258, 260, 264, Watermain Improvements 210, 217, 219,
220, 225, Street Improvements BA-103, BA794, Storm Sewer Improvements 95, 103,
106, 108, 110, and 112 read as follows : "First payment of each assessment will
be payable with the taxes for the year, collectible in 1969, with interest on the
RESOLUTION
"First payment of each assessment will be payable with the taxes fer
The owner of the property assessed for
8/19/68 c
entire assessment at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of the .resolution
levying the assessment to December 31, 1969.
will be added interest, at the same rate for one year on all unpaid install-
ments.
pay the whole of the assessment without interest to the Village Treasurer on
or before December 15, 1968, or make payment with accrued interest to the
County Treasurer."
Motion for adoption of the resolution wa
rollcall there were four ayes and no n
To each subsequent installment
The owner of the .property assessed for the following improvements may
ATTEST :
BIGN ORDINANCE NO. 61-C CONTINUED.
that Ordinance No. 61-C was not yet ready for Second Reading, Councilman
Shaw's motion that Second Reading be continued until September 9, 1968,
was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried.
Being advised by the Village Attorney
PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS ORDINANCE NO. 181-A CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 9.
the recommendation of Mr. Hyde, First Reading of Ordinance No. 181-A per-
taining to peddlers and solicitors was continued to September 9, 1968, by
motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
CONTRACT 67-9-A (SUPPLEMENT TO STORM SEWERL 50) AMENDMENT APPROVED. Mr .
Hyde advised Council that it is no longer feasible to construct the drain-
age system for back yards in Block 3 Normandale 2nd Addition, known as
"Supplement to Storm Sewer 50". He recommended authorization of an agree-
ment approved by the Village Attorney deleting this project from Contract
No. 67-9-A. Councilman Shaw thereupon offered the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Village Manager are hereby authorized
to enter into "Agreement Amending Contract for Local Improvements No. 67-9-A"
between Erickson & Erickson and the Village of Edina.
and on rollcall there were four ayes
Upon
RESOLUTION AMENDING CONTRACT NO. 67-9-A
Motion for adoption of the resolution
ATTEST : Mayor
$u---d-
Village Clerk
SWEEPER BROOM PURCHASE AUTHORIZED.
a sweeper broom from Minnesota Wanner Cornpang in the amount of $1,995.00.
He advised that three other companies contacted had been unable to supply
the broom.
item of equipment was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried unanimously.
Mr. Hyde requested authority to purchase
Councilman VanValkenburg's motion approving purchase of this
WBRTHERN STATES POWER RATE SCHEDULES showing present rates and proposed
increases was given to Council by Mr. Hyde. No action was taken.
WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS-MENDELSSOHN ADDITDN INSPECTION TRIP was set for
4:OO p.m. Wednesday, August 21, 1968, in order to obtain firsthand knowledge
of the specially benefited districts for Storm Sewer Improvements 103 and 95
and Street Improvement BA-94.
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE FOR GOLF COURSE FUND for seven months ended
July 31, 1968, was presented by Mr. Dalen, reviewed and ordered placed on
file by motion of Councilman VanValkenburg, seconded by Cmuncilman Courtney
and carried.
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE FOR RECREATION CENTER FUND for seven months
ended July 31, 1968, was presented by Mr. Dalen, reviewed and ordered placed
on file by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw and
carried.
22-0
8/19/68
CLAIMS PAID.
ney and carried for payment of the .following claims as per Pre-List:
Park Sinking, Swim Pool, Golf Course &Arena, $46,858.76; Water Fund $20,843.65;
Liquor Fund, $69,156.33; Sewer Rental Fund, $3,626.20; Improvement Fund, $448,863.29,
Poor Fund, $100.00; Total, $890,184.34.
Motion of Councilman VanValkenburg was seconded by Councilman Court-
General Fund, $28,995.08, Construction Fund, $271,741.03; Parks, Park Construction,
The agenda having been covered, Councilman Shaw's motion for adjournment was seconded
by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. Adjournment at 10:55 p.m.
/
Village Clerk
..
.I