Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19681028_regularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON OCTOBER 28, 1968 Members answering rollcall were Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, Shaw, VanValkenburg, and Mayor. Bredesen. MINUTES of the meeting of October 7, 1968, were approved as submitted by motion of Councilman Johnson, secopded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. PUBLIC. HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS.. the Edina Sun on October 17 and 24, and of Mailing on October 18, 1968, were pre- sented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as herein recorded: 1, .CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN GLASGOW DRIVE from W. 78th Street to west line of Lot 1, Block 1, Heath Glen Addition. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN GLASGOW DRIVE from Cecilia Cir- . cle to west line of Heath Glen Addition The above improvements covering the same area, hearings were conducted concurrently. Mr. Hyde presented total estimated cost of the sanitary sewer at $20,147.74, pro- posed to be assessed against 12 assessable lots at an estimated cost per assessable lot of $1,678.98. Total estimated cost of the watermain was given by Mr. Hyde at $14,860.97, proposed to be assessed against 12 assessable lots at an estimated cost .of $1,238.41 per assessable lot. Mr. H. Glocke, 7721 Glasgow Drive, advised that the majority of property owners oppose the improvements and questioned the estimated cost of the assessment. Mr. Hyde pointed out that estimates are given on the high side and that the assessment will only be made on actual cost of the projects. He added that while there is not much trouble in the area at present, it would appear that the improvements would be necessary by 1970 and that with rising costs the assessments would undoubtedly be considerably higher at that time. Mr. R. D. Hathaway, 7705 Glasgow Drive, spoke in opposition to the improvements, as did Mr. Earl J. Micka, 7700 Glasgow Drive, who stated that comparable improvements in Bloomington cost considerably less. Mr. Hyde pointed out that the City of Bloom- ington pays a portion of the cost of public improvements from other than special assessment funds. The property owner at 7708 Glasgow advised that all those who had signed the petitions in January, 1968, still desire the improvements. Mr. D, -H.' Youngren, 7717 Glasgow Drive, and Mrs. James Benson urged that the improvements be authorized. Following some discussion, Councilman Johnson moved that the improve- ments be authorized, in view of the fact that eight out of twelve properties have indicated their approval, because it will increase the value of the property, and in view of anticipated rising prices. Motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. 3. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: On an easement line from trunk sewer along rear lot lines of Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1, Gleason's 3rd Addition and sewer services in @en cul-de-sac 4. Road cul-de-sac Improvements 3 and 4 above affecting the same area, public hearings were conducted concurrently. Mr. Hyde presented estimated project cost at $10,516.94, proposed to be assessed against seven assessable lots at an estimated cost of $1,502.42 per assessable lot. Total estimated construction cost for water service connections was given at $2,221.32, proposed to be assessed against three assessable lots at an estimated cost of $740.44 per lot. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes). 5. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES in Cahill Road from Amundson Avenue to West 70th Street 6. Amundson Avenue to West 70th Street 7. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER in Cahill Road from Amundson Avenue to West 70th Street Improvements listed under 5, 6, and 7 above affecting the same properties, public hearings were conducted concurrently. Mr. Hyde presented total estimated project cost of the sanitary sewer at $9,008.93, proposed to be assessed against 5 assess- able lots at $1,801.79 per lot or against 740.5 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $12.17 per foot. Cahill Road watermain estimated construction cost was given at $8,986.05, proposed to be assessed against 4 assessable lots at $2,246.51 per assessable lot or against 542.5 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $16.56 per foot. permanent street surfacing and concrete curb and gutter at $15,542.13, proposed to be assessed against 893.81 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $17.39 per assessable foot. He advised that petitions signed by three property owners had been received for sewer and water improvements. Affidavits of Publication in I I (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes), CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES in Gleasons's 3rd Addition on Aspen No objections were heard from the audience. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT AND APPURTENANCES in Cahill Road from Mr. Hyde presented total estimated project cost for the Cahill Road Mr. Hite pointed out that the 10 /28/ 68 273 i assessment on a per foot basis was most appropriate for both sewer and water and that the property is presently undeveloped. the audience. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF OPENING, GRADING AND GRAVELING IN THE FOLLOWING: West 72nd Street: from Bush-Lake.Road to the east line of Edina Interchange Center 3rd Addition. -Mr. Hite presented total estimated project cost at $43,148.95, proposed to be assessed against all lots and blocks in Edina Interchange Center 3rd Addition at $28,765.96 (2/3 of the cost) and against Lots 1 and 3, Block 1, Edina Inter- change Center 2nd Addition 1st Replat at $7,191.49 (1/6 of the cost) for each lot. Mr. Hite noted that this improvement has been initiated by the Village as the result of the platting of Edina Interchange Third Addition and that it is recommended by the Planning Commission and Planning Staff that this road be installed from Edina Interchange 111 Addition across Edina Interchange 2nd Addition to Bush Lake Road. of Edina Interchange Center Second Addition has requested that those properties be added to the list of properties to be assessed. ing Maico, Inc., questioned the estimated construction cost, and protested.that Maico would have to give up land that they had planned to use for future devel- opment in their facilities, stating that the improvement is not necessary or desirable to their operations and would reduce the value of :the Maico property. Mr. Utne also pointed out that Maico would be responsible for future assess- ments for, improvement of the street. Mr. Hite noted that the estimated cost does not include cost of land acquisition and that Maico would be reimbursed for any land whi-ch should be acquired for the roadway. Mr. Hite advised that it has always been known that a road would be needed in this area but that it had not been determined just where this road would go. He further stated that without this road, 65 acres of prime industrial land would be served by only one road. Discussion ensued as to traffic patterns in the area, and it was pointed out that traffic from this area cannot ho through to the residential area on West 70th Street. Mr. John Wright, representing Lew Bonn, said his firm has purchased its particular lot over a year ago because they felt that it was a safe location, t4at .their property will appear awkward and misplaced . on a corner lot and that the property will be devalued. road was not included when the plat was approved. error had been made in the legal descrwion and that the notice should have indicated the "west" rather than the "east" line of Edina Interchange Center Third Additioq. Mr. Hite noted that when the building plans were submitted for the Maico Bqilding, a 50% building expansion had been anticipated and that the p,roposed road would not prevent this expansion. concern that if this property should be taken for the roadway, Maico could not build their proposed addition since they might not have enough land to comply with Village Zoning Ordinances. that, while future counc.i.1 cannot be bound by this council, he would recom- mend that strong consideration be given to approyal of any necessary variances and that if he were on the Council at that time, he would vote in f.avor of the possible variance. the road. Following considerable discussion, Mayor Bredesen suggested that the hearing be continued so that Council could have an opportunity to study the problems involved. enlarged and becau.se of the error in the legal description, Councilman Van Valkenburg offered the following resolution setting a new hearing date for this improvemept and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION~PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON OPENING, GRAPING AND GRAVELING No objections were heard from (See Resolution Ordering Improvements later in Minutes). He advised that Mr. Antonio Bernardi, the owner Mr. James Utne, represent- u3 p. rn a u u He noted that the He was advised that an Mr. Utne expressed Mayor Bredesen advised for the record Mr. Lek Bonn asked whose property would be benefitted by Bec.ause $he area proposed to be assessed is to be IMPROVEMENT NO. P-C-101 1. port as to the feasibility of the proposed imprcovement descqibed in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said report.is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the Village Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, November 18,, 1968, at 7:OO p.m. in the Edina Village Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper. once a week for two successiv,e weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice - to all affected properties in substantially the following form: ~ The Village Engineer,-having submitted to the Council a preliminary re- T - . _. -...-... 10/28/68 (Official Publication) HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA OPENING, GRADING AND GRAVELING . VILLAGE OF EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. P-C-101 EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL will meet at the,;Edina Village Hall on Monday, November 18, 1968, at 7:OO p.m., to.consider the following proposed improvement to be construc- ted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approx- imate cost of said improvements are estimated by the Village as set for-th below: CONSTRUCTION OF OPENING, GRADING AND GRAVELING IN THE FOLLOWING: W, 72nd Street from Bush Lake Road to the west line of Edina Interchange ESTIMATED COST I - Center 3rd Addition $43, 148.95 The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed Opening, Grading and Graveling includes all Lots and.Blocks in Edina Interchange Center 3rd Addition; Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 1, Edina Interchange Center 2nd Addition First Replat; an&Lot 3, Block 1, Edina Interchange Center 2nd Addition. Florence B. Hallberg Village Clerk Motion- for adoption of the resolution was second rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and .th ATTEST: %?Li-e-dk &, c Village Clerk 9. CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING IMPROVEMENT in Gleason Road €rom Schey Drive to Loch Moor Drive Mr, Hyde presented estimated project cost at $28,263.90, proposed to be assessed against 2,769.05 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $8.51 per foot. 1/6 of the cost is to be paid by State Aid funds for additional width. It was noted that a public hearing had been conducted and the project approved on April 18, 1968, as Street Improvement C-95. At that time it was agreed that 100% of the cost would be paid from State Aid funds, provided the property was not pl-atted.. However, preliminary plat approval has been granted St. Patrick’s addition, thus this new hearing is being conducted. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes), 10. CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT in Virginia Avenue from West 64th Street to West 65th Street Mr. Hy& presented total estimated project cost at $5,779.20, proposed to be ass- essed against an estimated 1,178.92 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $4.90 per foot. posed grade level of the street. be higher than the abutting lots but that the lots will drain so that they will be buildable, An unidentified man inquired the intent of the road, stating that he opposes bringing additional traffic into the area. Mr. ate. advised that the road is necessary for development of the platted lots adjacent to it. mussen, 6433 Parnell Avenue, advised that he enjoys the privacy which his extra property provides and that he does not intend to build on this land. He offered to sign a deed restriction so that no house could be built on his property, but advised that he could not speak for his neighbors. Mrs, Akason noted that while she was once opposed to opening the street,. she now favors the improvements since adjacent property owners want to build on their property.f Messrs. L, N. Miller,” 4701West 64th Street, Ray Kostick, 6508 Virginia Avenue, Brian Rushton, 6517 Parnell Avenue, and Dennis Quinlivan, 6325 Parnell Avenue advised that they would oppose opening Virginia Avenue through to the service road because it would encour- age traffic through Cornelia Park. Mr. Lawrence J. Melody, 6417 Parnell Ave., ad- vised C0unci.l that Virginia Ave, should be opened to West 66th Street but should- - cul-de-sac without entry to West 64th Street. Village residents have paid for the park and that everybody should have access to it. He also advised that Council should not create what would amount to a private street. Mr. Hite said that the proposed road would substitute the access to West 66th Street for the bad hill now on West 65th. Street. cul-de-sacs are far from satisfactory and that they tend to create private property from public funds. his property, No objections were heard from the audience. Mrs. Edward N. Akason, 4717 West 64th Street, inquired about the pro- She was advised by Mr. Drake that the street will Mr. Morris Ras- I Mayor Bredesen pointed out that Mayor Bredesen noted that An unidentified gentleman complained about water standing on He was advised by Mr. Hite that if he raised the land to street 10128168 1 grade that thib water would then drain into the street, lives at 65th and Sherwood Avenue advised that he favors opening Virginia Avenue as did a representative of WaL-Don Builders. discussion, Councilman VanValkenburg moved that the project be authorized, since property owners have a right to develop their property. seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Im- provement later in Minutes). .Sherwood Avenue from West 64th Street to West 66th Street Ryan Ave. from north line of Lot 4, Block 8, Normandale Addition to the north Parnell Ave. from north line of Lot 4, Block 8, Normandale Addition to the Virginia Ave. from north line of Lot 6, Block 1, Replat of Block 9, Norman- W. 64th St, from east service road to Hwy. #lo0 to east line of Lot 7, Block W. 65th St. from Sherwood Ave. to Ryan Ave. W. 65th St. from Parnell Ave. to Virginia Ave. Mr.<Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at $158,935.22, proposed to be assessed either on a front foot basis against 11,329.80 assessable feet at an estimated $14.03 per assessable foot or on a per lot basis against 90-213 lots whereby all lots pay $1,753.09. He advised that the intent of this pro- ject is to complete the permanent surfacing of all streets in the neighborhood bounded on the north by the Crosstown Highway, on the west by T.H. #LOO, on the east by Virginia Avenue and on the south by West 66th Street. Mr. Hite advised that a letter had been received from Mr. Lawrence Melody, 6417 Parnell Avenue, urging the improvement since it would improve the appearance of the neighborhood and improve the safety of the streets. 65th Street be closed between T.H. 100 and Sherwood Avenue in order to elim- inate a traffic hazard,.-that West 65$h Street be closed between Ryan Avenue and Parnell AvenuqFiin order to eliminate a dangerous hil-1, and that Virginia Avenub should be opened to'West 66th Street but should cul-de-sac without entry to West 64th Street. son, 6401 Normandale Road, who advised that streets abutting his property had already been improved with the construction of the Crosstown Highway. . Phillip Dugan, 6324 Parnell Avenue, stated that he favors the improvement but expressed concern that with a curb and gutter, water draining across the north- east corner of his lot toward the Crosstown Highway would not run off his property. solve this problem. Mr. L. F. Munger, 6424 Parnell Avenue, advised that he favors the improvement but feels that West 65th Street between Ryan and Par- ne11 Avenues should not be olosed since it would be more difficult for fire trucks to reach the area. Mr. Hite replied that this is one of the reasons for suggesting that Virginia Avenue be open to West 66th Street, so that a11 access to the area is not limited to Sherwood Avenue at West 66th Street. He also advised Mr. Munger that.if West 65th Street is closed, it will be repaired in some way so that the land will not erode. 6400 Normandale Road, protested his assessment since his property is already served with permanent streets and curb and gutter. at 6524 Sherwood Avenue advised that he favors the proposed improvement but indicated that he would like to know at this time just which method of ass- essment is to be used. ment will be determined at the assessment hearing and that this Council cannot make commitments for fu&ure Councils. there is a difference in this price and the estimated price for the paving project west of T.H. 100, Mr. Hite replied that some streets in.the area west of T.H. 100 had already been paved and that since the lots in the area pres- ently under consideration are larger than those east of the highway, frontage is lost under the "corner lot" formula. audience, Mr. Hite advised that the viewgram is in error and that West 65th Street will be paved between Ryan and Sherwood Avenues. He noted further that street will be installed only where it is necessary to serve properties where there is a-buildable lot and that storm sewer pipes are included in the project. Mayor Bredesen noted for the minutes that as of this date the present Council would recommend &hat future Council consider a per' foot assessment basis at the time the assessment is levied. Councilman Courtney assured Mr. Dugan that the Village would contact the County concerning the drainage over the northeast corner of his lot. Councilman VanValkenburg's motion approving the project was then seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) A gentleman who Following considerable - Motion was 11. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACINGCIN THE FOLLOWING: line of Lot 4, Block 18, Normandale Addition north line of Lot 5, Block 19, Normandale Addition dale Addition to West 66th St. 11, Normandale Addition He recommended that West A letter was also presented from Mr. Roy. C. Suren- 7 Mr. Mr. Hire advised that the Village and County should take action to - Mr. Roy Sorenson, The owner of the property Mayor Bredesen pointed out that the method of assess- In reply to the question as to why In reply to a question from the . 10/28/68 J 12. Valley View Road from Highway #lo0 to Mildred Avenue Mr. Hyde presented estimated construction cost at $42,657.72, proposed to be assessed against 3,221.27 feet at an estimated cost of $12.93 per assessable foot. He advised that a letter had been received from Mr. L. B. Roontz, 5129 Valley View Road, suggesting that the improvement be postponed for a few years. Mr, Koontz also expressed opposition to any storm sewer which might be installed in the area, Mr. Michael Cooper, 5132 Valley View Road, advised that he favors the improvement, as did Messrs. E. G. Precht, R. L. Moore, B. F. Ingwald, G. I. Williams, Darrel Knutson, Mrs. H. D..Wise andfMrs. Carol Peterson, all of Valley View Road. No further comments were heard. later in Minutes). Down Road from Kerry Road to LeeLValley Road Lee Valley Road from Down Road to Shannon Road, Shannon Road from Lee Valley Road to south line of Lot 4, Block 2, Fjeldheim 2nd Proposed street from Dublin Road to Shannon Road Fleetwood Drive from 550' north of,Kemrich Drive to.Kemrich Drive , On an easement Line from Kemrich Drive south to south line of Lot 1, Block 3,, CONSTRUCTION OF PEWENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER in I (See Resolution Ordering Improvement 13. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: * . Addition , Kemrich Knolls and thence east along south lines of Lots 1-8, Block 3, Kemrich Knells Addition Kemrich Drive from Shannon Road to Fleetwood,Drive Kemrich Drive from Lanham Lane to east line of Kemrich Knolls Addn. On an easement,line from Kemrich Drive .to Dewey Hill Road On an easegent line from Lanham Lane to proposed street Mr. Hite presented total estimated project cost at $172,507.92, proposed to be assessed against 2,740,505 assessable square feet at an estimated cost of .$O.06295 per assessable foot. tracts of land located between West 70th Street pd Dewey Hill Road and between Cahill Road and Braemar Park. because of the winding road pattern and steep road grades; It was further brought out that this is a lateral storm sewer and not intended to be the only storm sewer . in the ar.ea. waters into ponds on the low land north of Dewey Hil1,Road and West of Cahill Road. Mr, Hite referred to the Storm Sewer Assessment Policy which was mailed with the Notice of Public Hearing and advised that in,this project, properties having area- up to 24,000 square feet are consjdered to have asseesable areas equal to their actual area or 18,000 square feet, whichever is the lesser; properties having areas in excess of 24,000 square feet are considered to have an assessabJe area equal to the sum of 18,000 sqqare feet, and one-haJf of their-arqa in,excess of 24,OO squre feet-, 30,000 square feet actual area + 18,000 or 21,000 square feet assessable area), which are considered to be "extraordinarily'r benefited.as defined in the policy statement. proposed; some properties, generally located north of West 70th Street would be considered to be extraordinarily benefited. ject includes installation.of pipe up to Wexford Way, which is the area in which sewer and water were recently installed, and where a considerable amount of money was spent repairing the roads .following these installations. authorization of the entire project as proposed, but that the actual installation of sizorm sewer pipe north of Lee Valley Circle be held until such time as those streets are permanently improved. Mr. Hyde advised that the Village had been notified that the subaivider-of Kemrich Knolls would hold the Village responsible for any storm water damage to Kemrich Knolls properties. of Mr. Darrel Boyd, 7204 Shannon Drive, Mr. Hyde reviewed the recently adopted Storm Sewer Policy whereby Village Assessors evaluate p.roperty before and after construction of the storm sewer. He also noted the three classifications. con- sidered to b,e extraordinarily benefited as follows: Category 1 is considered to be benefited the greatest amount, in that, properties in this category would be relieved from damage to structures on that property; Properties incategory 2 iqoiild receive protection from damage other than to structures, such as land erosion; Category 3 is assigned to areas which have water standing in the middle of a block and would normally affect more than one piece of property. Clardon Drive, protested the improvement, stating that the project is necessary so that the vacant propertfes can be developed. as planned would eliminatq stagnant ponds and make, instead, stagnant swamps, Mr, Hite suggested !hat the complete system could be installed at this time if the residents desired, A letter from Mr. R. A. Roberts, 7012 Dublin Road, was presented, opposing the improvement and requesting that the hearing be delayed. ' He defined the benefited area as including all lots and He noted that the project is relatively expensive The proposed system is designed to tempo.rarily discharge surface I (Example: With the aid of the viewgraph Mr. Hite pointed out properties Council was advised that if the improvement is assessed as presently Mr. Hite further stated that the pro- He recommended In reply to a question Mr. Jack Brown, 7309 He charged that the improvement -.- . 10/28/68 m Mr, Louis Gross, 70.12 Kerry Road, was advised by Mr. Hite that his property drains to the north and west. Mr. Rex Burns, 7209 Shannon Drive, said that he had constructed a swale on his property and protested being assessed for this improverqent. Messrs. H. E. Kitchen,. 7004 Lanham Lane, R. L, Lillestrand, 7104 Down Road, and Richard Reiphow, 5908 Lee Valley.Road, questioned their assessments and protested having to pay to make buildable lots out of swampy areas. Mr, Hite advised that the purpose of the storm sewer is simply .to remove surface water and prevent erosion caused by the grading of streets in the area, Mr. R. W. Naegele, 5912 Lee Valley Road said that assessments for his property were exceptionally high and advised that he wanted to go on re- cord as being against the improvement and recommending that if the improvement is authorized, the work ,be done as inexpensively as possible, An unidentifieb lady in the audience said that the sooner the storm sewer. is installed, the lower the cost will.be, and recommended that the improvement, be authorized.c Mr. Hite advised that- the improvement had been initiated in response to necessity and indicated the three pipes which are necessary at this time north of Lee Valley Circle. Councilman Johnson, noting that this Council cannot commit future Cauncils, recommended that assessments for the storm sewer be assessed over a twenty year period, No further disucssion being heard, Councilman VanValkenburg said that there is an apparent need for the storm sewer andmoved that the improvement be installed in two sections as outlined by Mr. Hite, with the recommendation to the assessing Council that -the assessment be spread over a longer period of time than normal. Motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Im- provement later-in Minutes). PRQVEMENTS OF PUBLIC WAYS IN THE 50TH AND FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT. Mr. I . Hite advised Council thstthe improvements in the 50th and France Business District have been divided into four subprojects. imated construction cost for Subproject A (South Parking and Accesses) at $400,000, 25% or $100,000 of which is proposed to be assessed to the entire commercial area on the basis of proportionate building area of 226,923 square feet at an estimated cost of $0.44 per square foot. 75% or $300,000 of the total estimated construction cost is proposed to be assessed to commercial. properties south of West 50th Street on the basis of relative parking need of 366 parking spaces at $820.50 estimated cost per needed space. Mr. Hite described Subproject A as a two level parking ramp to be located behind the Edina Theater, providing approximately 204 parking spaces including vehicular access to both West 50th Street and to south ring road, plus pedestrian ac- cesses to West 50th Street and to France Avenue. estimated cost for Subproject B (Northeast Parking and Accesses) at $143,000, 25% or $35,750 of which is proposed to be assessed to the entire commercial area on the basis of,proportionate building area of 226,923 square feet at an estimated cost of $0.157 per square-foot. -75% or $107,250 of the total est- imated construction cost is proposed to be assessed to commercial properties north of West 50th Street and east of Twin City Federal property on the basis of relative parking need of 380 spaces at $282.23 estimated cost per needed space. Mr. Hite recommended that this subproject should await further developments on the Twin City Federal property. proposal is considerably less than the number needed. Mr. Hite presented total estimated construction cost for Subproject C (Northwest Parking) at $57,200, 25% or $14,300 of which is proposed to be assessed against the entire commercial area on the basis of proportionate building area of 226,923 square feet at an estimated cost of $0.0630 per square foot. is proposed to be assessed against commercial properties north of West 50th Street and west of Twin City Federal property on the basis of proportionate parking need-of-313 needed parking spaces, estimated at $137.06 per space. Because of considerable difference between parking spaces. needed and the number proposed, plus the fact that-the design of this facility is related to the redevelopment of the old library site, Mr. Hite recommended that action on this subproject be deferred. Mr. Hite presented Subproject D (Public Way Improvements consisting of sidewalk, landscaping, signing, lighting and other aesthetic improvements to Public Ways). total estimated construction cost at $66,000, 25% or $16,500 of which is proposed to be assessed to all commercial properties on the basis of relative building area of 226,923 square feet at an estimated cost of $0.073 per square foot. 75% or $49,500 is proposed to be assessed to all properties abutting West 50th Street on the basis of proportionate street frontage on West 50th Street of 1,580 feet at an estimated cost of $31.33 per front foot. plans for the parking ramp in reply to questions of Mr. Mark Nelson, 5030 France Avenue South, and Mr. Regis Yunker, Eepresenting Lunds' Inc. In reply . I 14. I CONSTRUCTIO~ OF PUBLLC PARKING FACILITIES, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER IM- /J- I He presented total est- Mr. Hite presented total I The number of spaces made available by'this 75% or $42,900 . He presented Mr. Hite reviewed / 10128168 to a question of Mrs. 17. H. Hauck, 5029 Indianola Avenue, Mr. Hite explained. that it is proposed to use the old library building. site and Library Road for parking and for landscaping but that the meeting will be held soon with adjacent property owners to discuss final plans.. Following some discussion, Councilman VanValkenburg's motion authorizing Subprojects A and D only was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes). 15, STORM SEWER IN THE FOLLOWING: ."I Hansen Road from County Road /I158 to West 60th Street West 60th Street from Hansen Road to 150' East Mr. Hyde presented.tota1 estimated project cost at $211,417.58, proposed to be assessed-against 5,595.14 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $12.00 per foot,. with $144,275.90 proposed to be paid by the State Aid. Mr. Hite noted that Hansen Road is not presently centered on the right-of-way and that normally all additional width would be on the west side. He advised that, if the project is approved, Village Engineers would stake out the road and meet with property owners to answer questions as to the road alignment. 5816 Hansen Road, advised that he realized the necessity for storm water drain- age but that he did not feel that a 36 foot street is necessary, He urged that the street be constructed so as to save large trees in the area. Mr. Hite pointed out that it is important that this improvement be constructed before Highway 100 is improved so that traffic can be accommodated during the construc- tion period. He noted also that the street must be 36 feet in width if State Aid funds are to be used and that at that width parking would be permitted only on oneside of the street. Messrs. Thomas Ward, B, W. Thompson, C. R. Reis, . G. M, Lawrence, Mrs. P, W. Hubert and Dr. Anita P. Smith, all of Hansen Road, participated in the ensuing discussion relative to traffic patterns and traffic counts and emphasized their opposition to anypossible loss of trees by widening the street. Mayor Bredesen pointed out that trees adjacent to the street were on Village right-of-way. Mr. Detrich said he owns two lo@ that are filled,with water and that he now desires to build on them. He urged the pernament street surfacing at either the 30 or. 36 foot width and.also urged authorization of the incidental storm sewer, be continued until November 18, 1968, in order that additional information can be studied concerning present and projected traffic counts and the difference be- tween a 30 and 36 foot road in respect to the setbacks of dwellings on the street. Motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. An unidentified gentleman in the audience asked the possibility of having underground electric wires in- stalled and was advised that this could possibly be done. Councilman VanValken- burg then offered the following resolution and moved it adoption: CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING, CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER AND I Mr. William Williamsen, Councilman VanValkenburg then moved that the hearing I RESOLUTION ORDERING SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 277, 278, 279, WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS 236, 237, - STREET IMPROVEMENTS C-100, (2-99, BA-134,&336 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT 117 AND PARKING IMPROVEMENT P-1 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice.of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvements: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Glasgow Drive from Cecilia Circle to west line of Heath Glen Addition 2. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Glasgow Drive from West 78th Street to west line of Lot 1, Block 1, Heath Glen Addition On an easement line from trunk sewer along rear lot lines of Lots 1 through 4, Block.1, Gleason's.3rd Addition and sewer services in Aspen cul-de-sac 4. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Gleason's 3rd Addition on Aspen Road cul-de-sac' 5, CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER,AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Cahill Road from Amundson Avenue to West 10th Street, 6. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: Cahill Road from Amundson Avenue to West 70th Street 7. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING: Cahill Road from Amundson Avenue to West 70th Street 8. Gleason Road from Schey Drive to Loch Moor Drive 9. CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOWING: Virginia Avenue from West 64th Street to West 65th Street . 3. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER AND APP~TENANCES IN THE FOLLOWING: CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOWING: c 10/28/68 19. GUTTER IN THE ,FOLLOWING:. Sherwood Ave. from(TJ. 64th St.' to West 66th St. Ryan Ave. from north line o$ Lot $, Block 8, Normandal<e Addition to the north Parnell Avenue from north line of Lqt 4, Block 8, Normandale Additi,on to the Virginia Avenue* from north line of Lot 6,, Block 1, Replat of Block 9, Normap- W.' 64th St. from easet servicec road of Hwy. '#lo0 to east line of Lot 7, Block CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND ' - line of Lot 4, Block 18, Normandale Addition north line of Lot 5, Block 19, Normandale Addition dale Addn. to West 66th St. 11, Normandale Addiction I W. 65th S.t. from Sherwood Ave. cto Ryan Avenue - IN TH;E FOLLOWING: ,. 12. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER AND APPURTENANCES IN THE" FOLLOWING: W. 65th St. f<rom ParnellIAve. to Virginia Avenue 11. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER Valley View Road from T.H. 100 to Mildred Avenuee Down Road from Kerry Road to Lee Valley Road Le<e Valley Road from Down Rqad <to Shannqn Road Shannon.Road from Lee Valley Road to south line of Lot 4, Block 2, Fjelqheim Proposed street from Dublin Road to Shannon Road Fleetwood Drive from 550' north pf Kemrich Drive to Kemrich Drive On an easement line from Kemrich Drive south to south line of Lot 1, Block 3, Kemrich Knolls and thence east along south lines of Lots 1-8, Block 3, Kern Kemrich Drive from Shannon Road to Fleetwood Drive Kemrich Drive from Lanham Lane to east line of Kemrich Knolls Addn. On an easement $.ine from Kemrich Drive to Dewey Hill Road On an easement line from Lanham Lane to proposed street 13. 50th and France Business District and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby deterpine to proceed wi,th the construct,ion of said improvements as Described in Notices of Hearing, except that Storm Sewer in the Prospect Hills area listed under.12 above (S.S. 11-7) s>all be constructed in two sections as outlined in the Public Hearing, including all$roceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acqui<sition ofc necessary easements and rights for construction and maiqtenence of such improvements; that said improvements are hereby desig- nated and shall be referred to in all subsequent pr0c.e-edings as follows: No. 1 Above SANITARY SEWER 278 No. 2 Above W4TERMAT.N NO. 236 I No. 3 Above SANITARY SEWER NO. 277 No. 4. Above (. WATERMAIN NO. 235 No. 5 Above SANITARY SEWER NO. 279 No. 6 Above WATERMAIN NO. 237 * No. 8 Above STREET IMPROVEmNT NO. C-95 No. 9 Above STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. C-99 No. 10 Above . STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-134 No. 11 Above STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-136 No. 12 Above STORM SEWER NO. 117 t - < c 2nd Addition rich Knolls Addition CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING IMPROVEMENT I,N. THE FOLLOWING: , No. Z Above STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-135 - No. 13 Above PARKING IMPROVEMENT NO. P-1 and the area to be specially assessed for: Sanitary Sewer 278 shall include Lots 1 thru 7, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2, Heath Glen Addition; for Watermain 236, Lots 1 thru 7, Block 1, and Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2, Heath Glen Addition; for Sanitary Sewer 277, Lots 1 thru 5, and Outlot A, Block 1, Gleason's Third Addition; for Watermain 235, Lot 5 and Outlot A, Block 1, Gleason's Third Addition; for Sanitary Sewer 279, the north 130' of E. 308' of Parcel 2100, Parcels 2500, 2600, 2700, and 2920, all in Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21; Watermain 237, .the N. 130' of E. 308' of Parcel 2100, Parcels 2500, 2600, 2700, all in Sec. 8, T. 116, R 21; for Street Improvement BA-135, N. 130' of E. 308' of Parcel 2190, Paccels 2500, 2600, 2700, 3000, 4600, 2920, a11 in Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21, Lot 1, Block 2, Amundson Terrace, and Lot A, R.L.S. 1193; for Street Improvement C-95, Lots 1 thru 5 and Outlot 1, Block 1, Schey's Rrkview 3rd Addition and Lot 11, Prapect Hills; for Street Im- provement C-99, Lots 9 thru 12, Block 11, the E. 1/2 of lot 3 and Lot 5, Block 12, Normandale Addition, Lots land 2, Block 1, Huber's Addition and Lot 2, Block 1, Wal-Don Bui1der:s First Addition; '2880 / . . .- I 10/28/68 the area proposed to be assessed for the cost of BA-134 includes Lots 4 and 4, Block 7, Lots 4 and 5, Block 8, Lots 'lithrough 12, incl, Block 11, Lots 3 and 5, Block 12, Lots 2 thru 5 incl., BLock 13, Lots 1 thru 5 inch, Block 14, Lots 1, incl., Block 18, Lots 4 and 5, Block 19, Lots 13 and 14, Block 20, all in Nor- mandale Addn.; Lots 1 thru 8 incl., Block 1, Normandale Wicklund Replat; Lots 1 and'3, Block 1, Normandale Miller Replat; Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 1, Huber's Adda.; Lots l+and 2, Block 1 and Lot 1,- Block 2, Broad Oaks Addn.; Lots 6 'thru 10 incl., Block 1, Replat of Block 9, NormandalevAddn.; Lots 1 and- 2, Block 1, Replat of Lot 1, Block 13, Normandale PAddn.; Lot 2, Block 1, Replat of Lot 4, Block 15, Normandale Addn.; Lot 2, Block 1, Hodgdon Addn.; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Wal-Don Builder's 1st Addn.; Lots 1, 2, and 3, *Block 1, Wilrob Addn. The area proposed to be assessed for BA-136 includes Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, Lots 5 thru 10 incl,, Block 2, and Lots 10 and 11, Block 3, Clover Lane Addn,. 3rd Unit; Lots 1 thru 4, incL., Block 1, Birch-Lane Addition; Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 1, Patten Addn.; Lot 5, Block I, Stringer Addn; Lots 5 ehru 8 incl., Block 3, Lot 1, Block 5, Lots 3 and 4, Block 9, James A. Reoberts Estate; Lot 1, Block I, Lots 1 thru 8, Block 2, Mikulay's Addn; Outlot 1, Birchcrest Addn; Tract D, Registered Land Survey f327; Parcel 395, Sec, 33, T. 117, R. 21; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Proposed Genevieve Addn. The area proposed to be assessed for Storm Sewer No. 117 includes all lots and tracts of land within the following described boundaries: Commencing at the . southwest corner of the northeast 1/4 of See, 5, T. 116, R. 21; thence south 33' to -the south line of Dewey Hill Road; thence westerly along the south line of Dewey Hill Road a distance of 980'; thence northwesterly to the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Fjeldheim Addn.; thence northwesterly to a point in said Lot 1, said point being 30' west of the east line and 40' north of the south line of said Lot 1; thence westerly 40' north of and rarallel to the north line of Dewey Hill Road to a point in Lot 19, Block 1, Holands 1st Addn., said point being 50' west of the east line; thence northerly to a point on the north line line of Holands 1st Addn.; thence northwesterly to a point in most northerly line of Lot 15, Block 1, Holands 1st Addn., said point being 70' northeasterly of the northwest corner of said Lot 15; thence northwesterly to the west line of Lot 14, Block 1, Holands 1st Addn. said point being 70' north of the southwest corner of said Lat 14; thence westerly to a point in the west line of Lot 13, Block 1, Holands 1st addn., said point being 50' north of the southwest corner of said Lot 13; thence northwesterly to a point in the north line of Lot 12, Block -1,- Holands 1st Addn., said point being 100' west of the northeast corner of said Lot 12; thence northerly to the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 3, Prospect Hills 2nd Addn,; thence northeasterly to a point on the north line of Lot 5, Block 3, Prapect Hills 2nd Addn., said point being-20' northwesterly of the northeast corner of said Lot 5; thence northwesterly to a point on the west line of Lot 1, Block 3, Prospect Hills 2nd Addn., said point being 120' northerly of the south- west corner of said Lot 1; thence northwesterly to a point on the east line of Lot 1, Block 2, Prospect Hills 2nd Addn., said point being 3Q' north of the southeast corner af said Lot 1;tbence northwesterly to a point an the west line of said Lot 1, said point being 70' north of the southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence northwesterly to a point in the north line of Lot 2, Block 1, Schey's Park View 2ndAddn. said point being 100' southwesterly from the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence northwesterly to a point in the north line of Lot 1, Block 1, Shey's Park View 2nd Addn., said point being 140' west of the north- east corner of said Lot 1; thence northwesterly to a point in the north line of Lot 12, Prospect Hills Addn,, said pirint being 60' east of the northwest corner of said Lot 12; thence northeasterly to a point in the west line of Lot 13, Pros- pect Hills Addn,, said point being 228.53' northerly of the southwest corner of said Lot 13; thence northwesterly to a point in the east line of Lot 10, Prospect Hills Addn., said point being 40' south of the northeast corner of said Lot 10; thence northwesterly to a point in the north line of Lot 9, Prospect Hills Addn,, said point being 70' west of the northeast corner of said Lot 9; thence north- easterly to a point in the north line of Lot 8, Prospect Hills Addn., said pint being 50' northerly of the northeast corner af said Lot 8; thence northeasterly to appint in the east line of Lot 7, Prospect Hills Addn.; said point being 60'no~therly-of the northwest corner of Lot 6, Prospec$ Hills Addn,; thence northeasterly to ,a point in Lot "A1', R. L. S. 8971, said point being 100' east 'of the west line and 100' north of,the south line of said Lot cpAs'p; thence easterly 100' north of and parallel to the south li-ne of said Lot "A" to the east. line ,of said Lot I'A''; thence southeasterly to a point in the west line of Lot 4, Prospect Hills Addn., said point being 88.3' north of the,southwest corner of said Lot 4; thence southeasterly to the southeast corner of said Lot 4; thence northeasterly to a point in Lot 2, Block 1, A1 Peterson Addn., said point-being 50' east of the 2, 3, Block 15, Lots 3, 4, 5, Block116, Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 17, Lots 1 thru 4 I .. of Lot 16, Block 1, Holands 1st Addn., said point being 100' west of the east. ,. I . _. ~. , . ' 10128168 west line and 30' south of the north line of said Lot 2; thence northerly 50' east of and parallel to the west line of Lot 2 and 1, Block 1, A1 Peterson Addn.-to a point in said Lot 1, said point being 50' south of the north line of said Lot 1; thence easterly to a point in the east line of said Lot 1, said point being 50' south of the northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence northeast- erly to a point in the north-line-of Lot 1, Block 1, Hondo Addn., said point being 60' east of the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence easterly to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Hondo Addn.; thence southeasterly to a po'int in the south line of said Lot 1, said point being 50' east of the south- west corner of said Lot 1; thence southerly and easterly 50' easterly and northerly of and parallel to the east line of Lanham Lane to the east line of Lot 4, Block 2, Hondo Addn.; thence southeasterly to a point 240' east of the east line of Hondo Addn. and 150' south of the south line of Carolane Addn., thence southerly 240' east of and parallel to the east line of Hondo Addn.; thence southerly 240' east of and parallel to the east line of Hondo Addn., a distance of 735.17'; thence southeasterly to the northeast corner of Kemrich Knolls Addn.; thence southerly along the east line of Kemrich Knolls Addn. to the point of beginning. The area proposed to be assessed for Parking Improvement P-1 includes for the Proposed Public Parking Facilities, Landscaping and other Improvements of Public Ways listed under H above includes Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 1, Lund Kruse Addn.; Lot 1, Block 1, Replat of Lot 6, Block 1, Lund Kruse Addn. and the West 35' of Lot 36, Aud. Sub. 8172; Lot 1, Block 1, Stevens First Addition; Par- cels 1325, 1550, 1600, 1651, 1700, 1750, 1801, 1951, 2003, 2050,*2150, 2215, 2250, 2300, 2365, 2376, 2450, 2500, 2670, 2680, 2700, 2800, 2835, 2840, 2850, 2960, 2970, 3000, 3050, 3400, 3455, 3465, 3500, 3550, and 3650, all in Aud. Sub. &172. Motion for adoption of the resolution rollcall there were five ayes and no n m p.. m ts V 0 ATTEST : Village Clerk gL- p$- 2YL+%k& Village Clerk gL- p$- 2YL+%k& -ORDINANCE NO. 261-172 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. Mr. Hoisington presented Ordinance NO. 261-172 for Second Reading, advising that this ordinance cor- rects Section 3 of Ordinance No. 261-169 and stipulates which Office Building District Morningside area properties should be zoned. .No comments being heard, Councilman Johnson offered Ordinance No. 261-172 for Second Reading and' moved its adoption as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 261-172 AN ORDINANCE TRANSFERRING CERTAIN PROPERTIES TO THE 0-1 OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT; AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE - THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS EOLLOWS: Section 1. The boundaries of Subdistrict 0-1 in the Office Building District are hereby extended by adding to the description of the Subdistrict contained in paragraph 1 of Section 8 of Ordinance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village, as amended, the properties described below, and said para- graph is hereby amended according; Range 24. Range 24. ,(cc) The south 130 feet of Lots 7, 8, and 9, Block 1, Fairbarirn's Rearrangement measured at right a@es from the north line of Sunnyside Avenue." (aa) Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 549, Section 7, Township 28, (bb) Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 517, Section 7, Township 28, Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the Qrdinance was on rollcall there were five ayes and no - ATTEgT : Village Clerk .. I 10/ 28/68 ORDINANCE NO. 261-171 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. Mr. Hoisington presented Ordi- nance No. 261-171 for Second Reading, advising that this ordinance proveides for the zoning of Morningside areas not previously classified by Ordinance 261-169. No comments being heard, Councilman Courtney offered Ordinance No. 261-171 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows: .. ORDINANCE NO. 261-171 AN ORDINANCE RECLASSIFYING PROPERTIES IN THE FORMER VILLAGE1 OF MORNINGSIDE TO VILLAGE OF EDINA ZONING DISTRICTS C-1 COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 0-1 OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT OR AUTOMOBILE PARKING DISTRICT; AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 262. TEE VILUGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The boundaries of the Automobile Parking District are hereby extended by adding to the description of the District contained in Paragraph 1 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 261 of the Village the properties described below, and said paragraph is hereby amended accordingly: (1) All of Lots 4 and 5, Block 2, Fairbaitn's Rearrangement, and that portion of Lot 6, Block 2, Fairbairn's Rearrangement lying South of a line repres- ented by the-westerly extension of the South line of Lot 3 and including vacated alley; Section 2. The boundaries of the Office Building District are hereby extended by adding to the description of the District contained in paragraph 1 of Section 8 1 of Ordinance No.7261 of the Village the properties described below, and said para- graph is herebyeamended accordingly: ' t L c - Subdistrict 0-1: I c c (ad) All of Lot 7, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement. Section 3. The boundaries of the Commercial District are hereby extended by adding to the description of the District contained in paragraph 3 of Section 9 of 0rdinance.No. 261 of the Village the properties described below, and said para- graph is hereby amended accordingly: C-1 Commercial District: (21) All of Lots 4, 5, and 6, Block 1, Fairbairn's Rearrangement. .- Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full-force and effect immediately upon I its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded call Ehere were five ayes and no nays and the ncilman Shaw and on roll- - ATTEST : * Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 261-173 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. ance No. 261-173 for Second Reading advising that this ordinance applies to the R-3 Multiple Residence District-and that it would make this low density multiple housing more appealing and more flexible liy attracting town house developments. No comments being heard, Councilman Shaw offered Ordinance No. 261-173 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows: Mr. Hoisington presented Ordin- ORDINANCE NO. 261-173 ' AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE VILLAGE AS TO REGULATIONS APPLICABLE IN THE MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. SubparagraPh (a) of paragraph 2 of Section 4 of Ordinance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village, as amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: 'I (a) Principal Uses .. i District R- 2 : Dis tric t R-3 : Districts-R-4 and R-5: . (I) Residences containing two dwelling units. (1) Residences containing not less than 3 nor more than 12 dwelling units. (1) Residences containing 5 or more dwelling units. (2) Convalescent, nursing, rest and boarding care homes." Sec. 2. Subparagraph (b) of paragraph 3 of Section 4 of said ordinance, as "(b) Lot Coverage and Floor Area Ratio (FAR) amended, is hereby further amended to read as follows: 2 83 10)28/68 District Maximum Lot Coverage 1 Maximum FAR - R- 2 ' 20% R- 3 30% - R-4 30% - R-5 25% 1.2 The floor area ratio is the gross floor area of all buildings on a lot divided by the lot area;" upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance on rollcall there were five ayes and Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately nded by Councilman Johnson and ce was adopted. - ATTEST : / Village Clerk / / Village Clerk / JONES KNOLLS R-2 ZONING REQUEST WITHDRAWN. Mr. Hoisington,advised Council that the request of Mr. Sam Schneider had been withdrawn for R-2 zoning for Lots 4,.5, and 6, Block 1, Jones Knolls Addition, which hearing had been continued from Council Meeting of September. ORDINANCE NO. 261-174'GRANTED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hoisington presented th6 petition of Mr. E. G. Thernell for R-2 Residential District zoning for five lots located at the intersection of Gleason Road and Vernon Avenue. Planning Commission has recommended approval, with the ex- ception of Lot 1, Block 1, pending final decision of the exact alignment of the road right-of-way. Ordinance .261-17% for First Reading as follows: I No objections bekng heard, Councilman Johnson offered ORDINANCE NO. 261-174 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA 1-13 w V u ESTABLISHING AN ADDITIONAL R-2 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: 'Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordinances of the.Village of Edina, is hereby amended by adding the follow- ing subparagraph: District R- 2 : "(48) and Twenty-Six (26), Block Two (2), Killarney Shores AdditionKr Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and Section 1. Paragraph 1, Multiple Residence District Boundaries of 8 Lots One (1) and Thirty (30), Block Three (3), and. Lots One (1) after its passage and publication according to law. ORDINANCE NO. 261-175 GRANTED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Publication were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Hoisington presented the request of Shell Oil Company for C-4 zoning for a parcel of land 44.62 feet wide and 125 feet deep which lies immediately west of and is contiguous to the existing Halifax Avenue and West 50th Street station site. The parcel is currently zoned R-2 District and is occupied by a two family dwelling which will be removed if the C-4 zoning is granted. Mr. Hoisington stated that this request is similar to the recent request of Pure Oil Compnay and that the Planning Commission has recommended approval, pending approval of a curb cut variance to be considered by the.Board of Appeals at its next meeting and provided further that'the final plan be reviewed by Planning Commission before the building permit is issued. property would be bounded by a single family dwelling on the south, by the First Edina National Bank and old Library building to the north, an apartment building to the west and Pure Oil Company to the east. which would screen the station from abutting properties were presented and reviewed by Council. Mr. Hoisington noted that the option of Shell Oil ex6 pires in two days and recommended that the rezoning be approved and Second : - Reading waived, subject to the recommendations of the Planning Commission as tro the site plan. Mrs. W. H. Hauck, 5029 Indianola Avenue, asked if Shell Oil is aware of the dirt and noise connected with a gas station, and also complained that the station does not shovel their sidewalks in the winter. Mr:Hoisington advised that these conditions are recognized, and that there will be a number of improvements made in the new station. Mr. Hoisington noted that these matters, as well as direction of the lighting, had been Mr. He noted that the Landscaping plans > 10/28/68 discussed with Mr. Franz Klodt, the owner of the apartment building to the west and that upon Mr. Klodt's request, the station will face east rather-than north, Mr. Ilstrup of Shell Oil Company advised that his co.mpany will do eve.rything that is economically possible and was told by Mayor Bredesen that Planning Commission, will have the final determination as to approval of site plans, Mr..Xlodt advised that he opposes the rezoning since loan companies will not grant as high a mort- gage on apartment buildings which are adjacent to gas stations. He requested that the buffer be extended between the rearbof the station and the lot line, so that cars could not drive in that area. In reply to a question of Council- man Johnson, Mr, Hite said that failure to maintain the buffer as prescribed would be considered a misdemeanor. Village Attorney Whitlock recommended that Shell Oil Company sign a deed restriction in favor of the Village stating that the service station would be maintained in good order and that a ten foot buffer . would be maintained, as recommended by the Planning Commission, so long as the land is used as a service station. the authority to assure the signing of such a deed restriction by Shell Oil. Councilman Johnson then moved that the deed restriction be drawn jointly by the Village Attorney and the attorney for Shell Oil Company and brought back to Council for approval. carried. Councilman Johnson then ofiered the following ordinance for First Reading with waiver of Second ,Reading with the stipulation that publication be wsthheld pending approval of the d5ed restriction: I Mr. Ilstrup advised that he does not have Motion w?s seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and ORDINANCE NO. 261-175 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA COMMI~RCIAL DISTRICT I ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL C-4 THEZILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph 3, Boundaries of Commercial District, of Section 9 (Commercial District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordinances of the Village of Edina, is hereby amended by adding the following subpiragraph; District (2-4: I "(33) The West 24.62 feet of Lot l'and the East 20 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Steven's 1st Addition to Minneapolis, subject to easement for Hi&way over the Northerly 7 feet thereof" I Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication according to law. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seco and on rollcall there were five ayes and no Councilman VanValkenburg - ATTEST : I Village Clerk 8 CLAGRAMAR IV ADDITION GRANTED PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. public hearing on preliminary approval of Clagramar IV Addition had been contin- ued from October 7, 1968. approval of this five lot plat which is located west of Arbour Avenue north of West 61st Street. and moved its adoption: BE ITERESOLVED by the Edina Village Council that that certain plai entitled "Clagramar IV Addition" platted by Claude W. Callaghan and Grace B. Callaghan, husband and wife, and presented at the Meeting of the Village Council of October 28, 1968, he and is hereby granted preliminary approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was se rollcall there were five ayes and no nays an Mr. Hoisington recalled that He noted that Planning Commission has Gecommended Councilman Courtney then offered the following resolution - RESOLUTION Councilman Shaw and on C I ATTEST : ?4f XfLLuLG $44- Village Clerk WILLIAM SCOTT'S ADDITION, PETERSON REPLAT GRANTED.PRELIMINARY~APPROVAL. davits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file, Mr. Hoisington presented William Scott's Addition, Peterson Replat for preliminary approval, noting that this four lot plat of part of Lot 15, William Scott's Addition.is IQcated east of Kipling Avenue and south of West 41st Street and that approval has been recommended by Planning Commission. Councilman Van- Affi- f_ .* . 285 10128168 \ Valkenburg thereupon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED by the-Edina Village Council that that certain plat entitled "William Scott's Addition, Peterson Replat," platted by Jack A. Peterson and Corrine F. Peterson, husband and wife, and presented for preliminary approval at the Edina Village Council Meeting of October 28, 1968, be and is hereby granted preliminary approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was on rollcall there were five ayes and no RESOLUTION ATTEST: ?L-A- Village Clerk UXBAY REGISTERED LAND SURVEY GRANTED PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hoisington advised that Mr. Curtis W. Kingbay is the owner of a large tract of land south of Parklawn Avenue and west of France Avenue and that an apaotment building is being constructed on the westerly half of the property. mortgage purposes and Planning Commission has recommended preliminary approval with the stipulation that necessary variances be granted before final approval is granted. Councilman Johnson thereupon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Village Council that "Kingbay Registered Land Survey" platted by Curtis W. Kingbay and presented for preliminary approval at the Edina Village Council Meeting of October 28, 1968, be and is hereby granted preliminary approval subject to the condition that necessary variances be granted before final approval is granted. Motion for adoption of the resolution rollcall there were five ayes and no Affidavits of Mr. Kingbay wishes to divide the property into two parcels for RESOLUTION Mayor ATTEST : u* .- AkL-GU- &* zf2LetL Village Clerk I ,EDINA INTERCHANGE CENTER I11 ADDITION GRANTED PRELLMINARY APPROVAL. Affidavits of Publication were presented by Clerk, approved as Ed form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hoisington presented Edina Interchange Center I11 Addition-for preliminary approval, stating that this property is located south of West 70th Street and west of T.H. 100 and that Planning Commission had recommended ap- proval subject to -final engineering approval. He advised that this is the property through which West 72nd Street is proposed to be constructed, public hearing for a portion of which was held earlier in this meeting, andpwhich - hearing has be rescheduled for November 18, 1968. It was noted, however, that if the proposed street should not be authorized to Bush Lake Road, that West 72nd Street could cul-de-sac and, therefore, approval of the continuation of West 72nd Street posed no problem. the following resolution and moved its adoption:. BE IT RESOLVED hy the Edine Village Council that that certain plat entitled "Edina Interchange Center I11 Addition,'' platted by Metro U.S. Construction Corporation and presented at the regular meeting of the Edina Village Council, be and is hereby granted preliminary approval; Motion for adoption of the resolution was rollcall there were five ayes and no nay Councilman VanValkenburg thereupon offered RESOLUTION ATTEST : 2!.! Ed- dl/A Village Clerk ..- .. 286 ) .. 10/28/68 i SHERWOOD AVENUE VACATED SOUTH OF CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY SUBJECT TO GRANTING OF EASEMENT. Affidavits of notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hyde presented the petition of Mr. Russell J. Gerde for the vacation of a portion of Sherwood Avenue adjacent to the Crosstown Highway and noted that the Gas Company has indicated the need forl an easement for its pipes. were heard from the audience, whereupon Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and.moved its adoption, pending receipt pf the requested easement: No objections RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF SHERWOOD AVENUE WHEREAS, two weeks' published,.posted and mailed notice of a hearing to be held October 28, 1968, has been given and made and a hearing has been held thereon by the Village Council: NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Eennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of Sherwood Avenue, all as platted and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Hen- nepin County, Minnesota, be and is hereby bacated effective Decemberu, 1968, un- less on or before said date this resolution is amended, annulled or rescinded by the Village Council: I That portion of Sherwood Avenue lying north of the north line of West 64th Street and south of the south line of the Crosstown Highway. Motion for adoption of the resolution was se call there were five ayes and no nays and the ncilman Shaw and on roll- ATTEST : Mayor lu- h .LIRcLe-ul Village Clerk DITCHING BEWEN SAUY LANE AND COUNTY ROAD 18 CONTRACT AWARbED. award of contract for Ditching between Sally Lane and County Road 18 had been con- tinued from October 7, 1968, Mr. Hyde reviewed tabulation of bids received showing J. V. Gleason Co., Inc., low bidder at $4,800.00, Wilcox Contracting Co. at $6,680.00, Kraft Excavating Company at $8,600.00, Matt Bullock Contracting Co., Inc., and Don Anderson Excavating, Inc., at $9,700.00. Councilman.Shaw's motion for award of bid to recommendsd low bidder, J.V. Gleason Co., Inc., was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. WATERMAIN 234 CONTRACT AWARDED. Mr. Hyde presented tabulaFion of three bids re- ceived for Watermain 234 for water service to Lots 10, 11, and 12, Block 2, Valley View Heights Addition showing Northern Contracting Co. low bidder at $2,184.00, Phelps-Drake Co., Inc. at $3,210.00 and Peter Lametti Construction Co. at $3,355.20. Councilman Courtney's motion for award to recommended low bidder, Northern Contrac- ting Co., was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. Recalling that Engineer's estimate was given at $4,000.00. I SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CONTRACT AWARDED FOR 5520 KNOLL DRIVE. Mr. Hyde presented tabulation of two bids taken for sapitary sewer to serve 5520 Knoll Drive showing Allstate Plumbing To., Inc., low bidder at $2,828.20 and United Sewer &Water Service, Inc, $3,186.20. the area. state Plumbing Co., was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. BURNING ORDINANCE REQUEST RECEIVED. Mr. Hyde advised Council that a letter had- been received from Mrs. Harry L. Brown, 4606 Sunnyside Road, requesting that * Council adopt an ordinance against leaf and trash burning. A motion setting the request for processing was then made by Councilman Johnson;was seconded by Coun- cilman VanValkenburg- and carried. Cost of the sewer is to be added to the original sewer project in Councilman VanValkenburg's motion for award to recommend low bidder, All- -3 . FLUORIDATION OF WATER OPPOSED. Mr, Hyde called attention of Council to a letter from Minnesotans for Safe Water Supplies expressing opposition f~ flUo5idation of water. .No action was taken. BARTON ASCHMAN REPORT APPROVED FOR COUNTY ROAD 18. Mr. Hyde advised Council that the City of Hopkins has requested that Council approve the Barton Aschman Report as presented for the interchange of County Road 18 and County Road 3, whereupon Councilman VanValkenburg offered the following resolution and moved its adoption. RESOLUTION the subject o€ long discussion and study, and Associates have recently completed a new proposed design, and WHEREAS, the interchange of County Highway 18 and County Highway 3 has been WHEREAS, after many previous designs had been proposed, Barton, Aschman 2 8.7' 10128168 t WHEREAS, the Barton, Aschman plan appears to the Village of Edina to-be NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of the most suitable solution to the involved problems; Edina on this 28th day of October, 1968, that the County Commissioners of Hen- nepin County be requested to approve the steps to program an early-construc 1 by Councilman Shaw, and there were - ATTEST: I - ARCTIC WAY STREET SURFIACING PETITION was received, reviewed and referred to the Engineering Department for processingi STORM SEWER PETITION TO SERVE 46TH AND MEADOW ROAD was received, reviewed and referred to the Engineering Department for processing. FIRE FIGHTERS UNION TO MEET WITH COUNCIL, some time in November. Upon the recommendation of Mayor - Bredesen a meeting with Council and the Fire Fighters Union will be set for - HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING TO BE HELD. Mayor Bredesen - advised that he has not received acceptances from all members invited to serve - on the Human Rights Commission, but that a meeting has been set for November 6, 1968, for purposes of organizing the Commission. He advised that.all members of Council are welcome. TRAFFIC SIGNAL PARTICIPATION AT COUNTY ROAD 62 AND FRANCE AVENUE TURNED DOWN. County Highway Department relative to the cost sharing agreement now proposed whereby the Village pays 25% of the cost of the signals at T.H. 62 and Erance Avenue and the County pays 75% of the cost. Following some discussion, Coun- cilman VanValkenburg's motion that the Village once more turn down the offer ofsthe County for cost sharing agreement for signals at this intersection was then seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. -Mr. Kyde advised Council that a letter had been received from the Hennepin - PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AMENDMENT HEARING DATE SET. Upon the recommend- ation of Mr. Hoisington, November 18, 1968, was set for hearing date to con- sider whether sports clubs should be a permitted use in the Planned Industrial District by motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. W. 65TH STREET NAME-CHANGE HEARING SET for November 18, 1968, by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. - CHEROKEE SALES SUIT INSTIGATED. Mr. Hyde advised Council that Cherokee Sales has filed suit againstcthe Village for failure to rezone property on the south- west quadrant of Gleason Road and T.H. 100. PEDERSON DEED RESTRICTION MODIFIED. Mr. Hyde advised Council that the Village Attorney and the attorney for owners of the Pederson Dairy property have worked - out an agreement whereby the Village agrees to modify the restriction only for the benefit of Albert Earl Pederson and Violet H. Pederson. The modification would permit either of the Pedersons to sell, at retail, milk and dairy pro- ducts not pasteurized or produced on their property, whereupon Councilman John- son offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to enter into agreement in behalf of the Village with Albert E, Pederson and Violet H. Pederson under which agreement Albert E. Pederson and Violat H. Pederson and the survivor of them shall have the right to sell at retail milk and dairy products not pasteurized or produced at its property at 707 Washington Ave. S. Motion for adoption of the resolution wa rollcall there were five ayes and no n ded by Councilman Shaw and on ATTEST : 1. Village Clerk '288 1 .. . -- " 10/28/68 COUNTY-WIDE POLICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM ACTION CONTINUED. Mr. Hyde advised that he has written the Hennepin County Administrator regarding the County-wide Police Com- munication System Agreement and has had no reply. matter until such time as additional information is received from the County. He recommended continuing the LOT 13, BLOCK 1, CODES HIGHVIEW PARK-DIVISION APPROVED. Council that two years ago, Planning Commission had recommendgd division of Lot 13, Block 1, Codes Highview Park subject to lot depth variance. the variance, the division was inadvertently overlooked, and Mr. Hoisington recom- mended formal action at this time. ing resolution and moved its adoption: Mr. Hoisington advised Following receipt of Councilman VanValkenburg then offered the follow- RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Lee H. Nein is the owner of a certain parcel of land in the Village of Edina described as follows: The east 115 feet of Lot 13, Block 1, Codes Highview Park; and * WHEREAS, said owner has requested approval of the Village of Edina of the WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and conveyance and oynership of the above described land as a separate parcel; and zoning regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordin- ance Numbers 261 and 263-A; of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tract of land as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements'and provisions of Ordin- ance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and conveyance, sub- ject, however, to the provision,that no further subdivision be made of the above described tract of land unless made in compliance with th? pertinent ordinances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for-by these ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw and on roll- call there were five ayes and no nays and the resolution was seconded by Councilman ted. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village Shaw and on rollcall there were five ayes and ;PA&. .d o/ ATTEST : Mayor " ds.*L A*, Village Clerk LOTS 4 AND 5, BLOCK 19, NORMANDALE ADDITION DIVISION REQUEST WITHDRAWN. Hoisington advised Council that the request for division of Lots 4 and 5, Block 19, Normandale Addition had been withdrawn by the petitioner. Mr. EDEN PRAIRIE SANITARY SEWER INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED. that the Village Attorney had worked out the Eden.Prairie Sanitary Sewer Intercon- nection Agreement which had been agreed upon in principle, whereupon Councilman VanValkenburg offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Mr . Hyde advised RESOLUTION APPROVING EDEN PRAIRIE SANITARY SENER INTERCONNECTION AGREEMENT BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Village Council hereby authorized the Mayor and Clerk to enter into agreement with the Village of Eden Prairie for Sanitary Sewer Inter- connection. Motian for adoption of the resolution was se rollcall there were five ayea and no nays an uncilman Johnson and on ATTEST : Mayor I!' qL A- Yh Village Clerk LOT 33, WARDEN ACRES QUIT CLAIM DEED AUTHORIZED. Mr. Hite recalled to Council that this 25'. strip of Lot 33, Warden Acres, located to the east of the Benton Avenue Bridge was acquired by the Village ghrough a trade. He noted that the Village has no need for-the property and recommended that it be deeded to Mr. Donald Berg, the adjacent property owner. following resolution and moved its adoption: Following some discussion, Councilman Johnson offered the 10/28/68 RESOLUTION APPROVING-QUIT CLAIM DEED FOR PART OF LOT 33, WARDEN ACRES BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Village Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and Village Manager to execute a Quit Claim Deed in favor of Donald Berg for that - part of Lot 33, Warden Acres, lying easterly of the railroad right-of-way and north of the westerly extension of the south line of Lot 1, Block 1, Theo, Nelson's Addition. Motion for adoption of the resolution was rollcall there were five ayes and no nfl and the resolutiofr-/was adopted. nded by Councilman Shaw and on ATTEST : Village Clerk LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 14, CLEVELAND SUBDIVISION OF EMMA ABBOTT PARK, ACQUIRED BY VILLAGE. Mr. Hyde advised that on August 13, 1968, the Park Board had approved the purchase of Lots 1 and 2, Block 14, Cleveland Subdivision of Emma Abbott Park, and recommended purchase of these two lots for a total cost of $3,500.00. Councilman VanValkenbyrg then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING .AC.QUISITION OF .LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 14, CLEVELAND SUBDIVISION OF EMMA ABBOTT PARK - BE IT RESOLYED by the Edina Village Council that the Village Manager and Village Clerk are hereby authorized to sign the purchase agreement for acquisition of Lots 1 and 2, Block 14, Cleveland Subdivision of Emma Abbott Motion for adoption of the resolution was Seconded by Councilman Courtney, and on rollcall there were five ayes adopted . - Park. and the resolution was ATTEST: < Village Clerk SIGN ORDINANCE 61C CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 4. Mr. Hyde presented, Sign Ord- inance 61C for second raading. Section 4, relative to billboards, as was contained,in First Reading, the Village Attorney having advised that this section is of doubtful legality, and the Planning Commission having recommended against it. 'Councilman Van - Valkenburg's motion to continue Ordinance 61C to November 4, 1968, was then seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. SIGN ORDINANCE 261-170 CONTINUED to November 4, 1968, by motion of Council- man VanValkenburg, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. 1969 COUNTY HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES BUDGET HEARING REQUESTED. Hyde advised Council that the County proposes to distribute costs of mental health and alcoholism on a county-wide tax levy rather than by a levy dis- tributed on a use basis. be 3.53 mills as opposed to 3.21 mills for this year. Following some dis- cussion, Councilman Johnson moved that other municipalities be contacted to see if they are interested in joining the Village in this protest. Motion was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. Johnson thereupon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Discussion, ensued as to the deletion of . Mr. He noted that the Suburban levy for next year will Councilman RESOLUTION REQUESTING COUNTY BOARD TO PROVIDE HEARING TO REVIEW 1969 HOSPITAL AND HEALTH SERVICES BUDGET WHEREAS, on.October 10, 1968, the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners transmitted to the Village of Edina a proposed 1969 Budget for Hennepin County General Hospital and other health services, together with the proposed revenue and tax levy projections deemed necessary to sustain such operation during the coming fiscal year; and ality of the method of distributing the costs of the mental health/alcoholism program, inasmuch as such program is to be funded by county-wide tax levy rather than by a levy distributed on a use basis; and WHEREAS, it appears to this Council that there is doubt about the leg- “290 I , --.. . ‘ b! 10/28/68 WHEREAS, Minnesota Laws, Chapter 738, provides that,a municipality may request a hearing on such budget, levy estimate, and tax levy; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of - Edina that the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners is hereby requested to review its proposed 1969 budget revenue estimates and taxtlevies for Hennepin County Gen- eral Hospital and Health Services at a hearing, upon notice to the Village of Edina. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Village Attorney is aufzhorized and directed to transmit this request to the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners. Motion-for adoption of the resolution was secon Councilman VanValkenburg and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays a . ATTEST : I a- d, Yh Village Clerk r TREASURER’S REPORT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1968, was reviewed and ordered placed on file by motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. , 7 FILL FOR WALNUT RIDGE PARK AUTHORIZED. 7,000 yards of till for Walnut Ridge Park and for the new storage site of the Village at a cost not to exceed $1,995.00. the purchase was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. UNDERGROUND WIRING APPROVED FOR SKATING RINK AT CREEK VALLEY SCHOOL. Mr. Hyde re- . quested authority to install underground wires for lighting the Creek Valley School Hockey and Skating Rinks. installation at $1,405.00 and at $1,515.09 for fixtures and that the amount. was in- cluded in the Park Department Bbdget. this installation was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. CLAIMS PAID. and carred .for confirmathon of payment of the following claims: General Fund, $32,218.85; Construction Fund, Park, Park Construction, Swim Pool, Golf Course and Arena, $9,219.02; Water Fund, $23,012.68; Liquor Fund, $70,982.23; Sewer Rental Fund, $922.51; Improvement Funds, $412,326.84; Total, $548,682.13; and for payment of the following claims as per Pre-List dated October 28, 1’868: $34,956.03; Construction Fund, $231,823.00; Park, Park Construction, Swim Pool, Golf Course and Arena, $12,541.32; Water Fund, $1,085.31; Liquor Fund, $25,572,05; Sewer Rental Fund, $314.89; Total, $306,292.60. MR, GEORGE HITE THANKED FOR OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO THE VILLAGE UPON HIS RESIGNATION. Mayor Bredesen previously advised that Mr. George Hite had accepted the posltion of Manager of the Village of Eden Prairie and commended him for his excellent contri- bution to Edina during his employment by the Village. the following resolution of appreciation to. Mr. Hite and moved its adoption: Mr. Hyde requested permission to purchase Councilman Johnson’s motion approving * . He advised thab Edina Electric was low bidder for the Councilman Courtney’s motion authorizing Councilman VanValkenburg’s motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw I General Fund, Councilman Johnson offered - RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - TO GEORGE C. HITE - WHEREAS, GEORGE C. HITE has served the Village of Edina since 1957, serving first as AdministratZve Assistant, then as Planning Director and for the past four years as Assistant Village Manager and Director of Public Works and Engineering; and WHEREAS, over these years Mr. Hite has served with unswerving devotion and loyalty to the Village of Edina, giving unstintingly of his time., and WHEREAS, Mr. Hite has accepted the position of Manager of the Village of Eden Prairie ; c NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Village Council express its sincere gratitude for Mr. Hite’s excellent services; its regrets that he is leaving; and its best wishes for great success in his new Motion for adoption of the resolution was se I ATTEST : 49, & rdL Village Clerk A 10/28/68 COMPLAINTS MADE RELATIVE TO TONKA KENNELS. Mrs. John L. Mortison, 6808 Southdale Road, read a letter enumerating a number of complaints about Tonka Kennels and asking that these complaints be considered before their contract is renewed for 1969; She recommended that unscheduled Inspections be made to whomever the contract is awarded to ins.ure adequate facilities and humane care. for pets which are picked up. Councilman Johnson's motion that Mrs. Mortinson's charges be investigated was secanded by Councilman Shaw and carried. No further business appearing before the Council, Councilman Courtney's motion for adjournment Was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. Adjournment at 12:OO. - u3 G Village Clerk - MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE CANVASSING BOARD FOR EDINA VILLAGE 'ELECTION, HELD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1968 Meeting convened at 5:OO"p.m. on Thursday, November 7, 1968, at the Village Hall. I Findings of the appointed Canvassing Board were inspected and compared with the returns of the Election Judges. It was then moved, seconded and unani- mously carried that the returns of the Village Election held November 5, 1968, be certified as follows: COUNCILMAN (3 years) ill #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 #8 #9 TOTAL Robert P. Anthony 360 419 432 417 633 269 483 497 266 3,776 * Richard C. Johnson 1074 1701 1064 1749 1465 443 1310 1776 455 11,037