Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2018-12-04 City Council Regular Meeting Packet
Agenda City Council Meeting City of Edina, Minnesota City Council Chambers Tuesday, December 4, 2018 7:00 PM I.Call To Order II.Roll Call III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda IV.Community Comment During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to sta) for consideration at a future meeting. V.Adoption Of Consent Agenda All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A.Approve Minutes: Town Hall Meeting of November 17, 2018, Work Session of November 20, 2018 and Regular Meeting of November 20, 2018 B.Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 11.21.18 TOTAL $1,596,585.12 And Pre-List Dated 11.29.18 TOTAL $1,240,184.53 C.Resolution No. 2018-122: Approving Deferral of Special Assessments D.Fair Housing Policy E.Execute Cost Share Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for Installation of Segmented Blades on Five City Plow Trucks to Reduce Chloride Use F.Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy Amendment G.Special Assessment Policy Revision H.2018 Market Value BeneCt from Street Reconstruction Appraisal Consultation Report I.Response to Resident Petition Highway 169 Noise Walls at Manor Homes of Edina J.Resolution No. 2018-128: Supporting Drafting a Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT for Landscape Partnership Program K.Resolution No. 2018-130: Receiving Engineering Studies for 2019 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects L.2019 Commission Work Plans M.2019 Human Services Task Force Funding N.Resolution No. 2018-123: 2019 Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees O.Request for Purchase: Three Engines and One Aerial Truck P.Request for Purchase: Replacement of Liquor Store Refrigeration Doors Q.Request for Purchase: Braemar Golf Course - Toro Reelmaster 3555-D R.Request for Purchase: Braemar Golf Course - Toro TriGex 3320 Hybrid S.Request for Purchase: Design Services Park Signage and WayCnding T.Resolution No. 2018-129: Approving Proposed Parks & Recreation Department Fees for 2019 VI.Special Recognitions And Presentations A.Human Rights and Relations Commission: Tom Oye Award Recipient VII.Public Hearings During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City sta) members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the eIcient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A.PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2018-18 Amending Solar Zoning B.CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO JANUARY 8, 2019: 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan C.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2018-127, Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Variances at 4532 France Avenue D.PUBLIC HEARING: 2019 Building & Liquor License Fees, Ordinance No. 2018-17: Amending Chapters 2 and 28 of the City Code, Setting Fees for 2019 E.PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2018-125: Setting 2019 Tax Levy and Adopting Operating Budget, and Review 2019 Budget VIII.Reports/Recommendations: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A.Ordinance No. 2018-15, Resolution No. 2018- 116 & 2018-117; Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development plan for France Equities LLC at 7200 & 7250 France Avenue B.Resolution No. 2018-126: Accepting Various Grants & Donations IX.Correspondence And Petitions A.Correspondences B.Minutes 1.MINUTES: Energy and Environment Commission October 11, 2018 2.MINUTES: Community Health Commission: October 8, 2018 3.Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission, October 23, 2018 C.Advisory Communication 1.Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Beard Ave Sidewalk in Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction X.Aviation Noise Update XI.Mayor And Council Comments XII.Manager's Comments XIII.Schedule of Meetings and Events as of December 4, 2018 XIV.Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampliCcation, an interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Approve Minutes: Town Hall Meeting of November 17, 2018, Work Session of November 20, 2018 and Regular Meeting of November 20, 2018 CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve minutes of the Town Hall Meeting of November 17, 2018, Work Session of November 20, 2018, and Regular Meeting of November 20, 2018. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Draft Town Hall Meeting Minutes November 17, 2018 Draft Work Session Meeting Minutes November 20, 2018 Draft Regular Meeting Minutes November 20, 2018 MINUTES OF THE TOWN HALL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT SENIOR CENTER NOVEMBER 17, 2018 10:00 A.M. TO 12:00 NOON CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 10:01 a.m. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Fischer, Staunton, Brindle, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland. The Mayor explained the purpose of the town hall meeting was to allow a free flow of questions between residents and Council. Approximately 30 residents attended the meeting and asked a variety of questions that included the following: • Appreciation to Public Works employees for sweeping streets in the Cornelia Neighborhood and helping to keep Lake Cornelia clean. • Concern that townhall meetings were not recorded. • Status of Pentagon Park, ownership and plans for the site. • Questions related to development application, small area plan guide, pace of development and making development palatable to neighborhoods. • Comprehensive Plan and Small Area Plan as guidelines or rules. • City Council meetings were too long. • Consider other options to special assessment for street reconstruction. • License rental housing to protect tenants. • Questions related to Grandview Green Lid halted plan and what was currently planned for the area. • Total fees paid by developers for not providing affordable housing and how was the money used. • Trimming tree branches obscuring street sign for safety. • Pros and cons of developing medical office buildings in Edina. • Amount spent on Grandview site with developer. • Economics of redevelopment including land and construction costs. • Consider implementing an ethics policy. • Impact of Southwest Light Rail on Edina. • Increased developments in Greater Southdale and population growth. The Mayor thanked everyone for attending. The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 12:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 4, 2018. ___________________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 20, 2018 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. Answering roll call were Members Brindle, Fischer, Stewart, Staunton, and Mayor Hovland. Edina City staff attending the meeting were Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Technology Services Director; Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner; Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator; Casey Casella, City Management Fellow, Ann Kattreh, Parks & Recreation Director; Chad Millner, Engineering Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; Lisa Schaefer, Assistant City Manager, Cary Teague, Community Development Director, and Don Uram, Finance Director, Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director; and Ross Bintner, Engineering Services Manager. 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Plan & Utility Rate Study Update The City’s financial consultant, Jessica Cook, Ehlers & Associates and Director Uram presented updated information on utility rate increases that will be necessary to fund infrastructure projects proposed in the 2019-2023 CIP. The amount and sale of utility infrastructure projects increased substantially over the previous plan, as a result the following recommendations were made: • Rate increase of 5% for sanitary sewer and water; • Rate increase of 15% for storm water; • Increase in SAC and WAC fees, plus inflationary increases, for new units; • Remove two projects that were not included in the study (Morningside/Weber flood project and Lake Cornelia Clean Water project); these projects would be studied separately and added back later. Based on this discussion, staff will present the proposed 2019 fee schedule to City Council on December 4 for approval. Comprehensive Plan Update: Economic Competitiveness Chapter & The Greater Southdale District Plan Michael Schroeder, co-chair of the Greater Southdale district working group, presented an update that included policy plan, design experience and implementation review. Mr. Schroeder said more than 370 comments have been received with more opportunities for input. Todd Thorsen, Planning Commission, and Janna King, Economic Development Services, Inc, presented the Economic Competitiveness Chapter. Ms. King presented several key indicators as examples of the region’s ability to prosper in the global economy and local strategies to enhance business formation and growth, employment and tax base. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:56 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 4, 2018. ________________________ James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 20, 2018 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:04 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, and Mayor Hovland. III. MEETING AGENDA AS PRESENTED Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, approving the meeting agenda as presented. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT Lori Grotz, 5513 Park Place, shared comments regarding being overcharged sales tax at the Red River Kitchen and asked the City to address where the additional sales tax revenue was being directed. Frank Lorenz, 7151 York Avenue, suggested similarities in government corruption between Edina and Bell, California, and suggested Council provide training and guidance to the Edina Police Department due to profiling children of color. Manager Neal referred to comments made by Mr. Lorenz at the last Council meeting regarding pizza purchases assumed for City staff and clarified the pizzas were purchased for resale at the Braemar concession stands, which resulted in an 18% percent return on purchase. He also responded to Mr. Lorenz’s comments regarding potential government corruption and stated no such activity was occurring in Edina. Mayor Hovland welcomed students from Mr. Stadem’s class and introduced Councilmember-Elect Ron Anderson. V. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED AS REVISED Member Staunton made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to remove Item V.F. from the Consent Agenda in its entirety. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. Member Fischer made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items V.D. Request for Purchase, Three Fire Engines and One Aerial Truck, V.E. Request for Purchase, Ambulance Billing and Collection Services Contract, and V.J. Arden Park Bid Award: V.A. Approve minutes of November 7, 2018, Work Session and November 7, 2018, Regular Council meeting, and General Election Canvass Meeting of November 13, 2018 V.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown as per pre-list dated November 8, 2018, and consisting of 41 pages: Total $1,887,102.72; and per pre-list dated November 15, 2018, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $172,429.56, Police Special Revenue $15,146.33, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety $32,771.65, General Debt Service Fund $450.00, PIR Debt Service Fund $450.00, Working Capital Fund $5,722.70, PIR Construction Fund $901.00, Equipment Replacement Fund $23,167.00, Art Center Fund $816.16, Golf Dome Fund $6,542.89, Golf Course Fund $31,431.87, Ice Arena Fund Minutes/Edina City Council/November 20, 2018 Page 2 $3,547.63, Sports Dome Fund $11,721.19, Edinborough Park Fund $4,934.46, Centennial Lakes Park Fund $728.13, Liquor Fund $82,422.91, Utility Fund $475,780.33, Storm Sewer Fund $6,801.80, Recycling Fund $39,321.72, PSTF Agency Fund $1,183.88, Centennial TIF District $7,632.97: Total $923,904.18 V.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2018-118; Calling for a Public Hearing on an Issue of Revenue Bonds by the City of Milaca on Behalf of A&E Care Properties, LLC V.D. Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Rosenbauer, Three Fire Engines and One Aerial Truck, $3,171,028.00 V.E. Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, LifeQuest Services, Ambulance Billing and Collection Services Contract, Billing Services: 3.5% net collections ($75,443 based on 2017 FY data) Collection Services: 20% of collections ($10,290 based on 2017 FY data) V.F. Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, ESRI GIS Enterprise License Agreement, $35,000.00 V.G. Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, WSB, Engineering Services for Valley View Road Sidewalk Phase 2, $ $36,078.00 V.H. Approve Agreement with 4602 and 4604 Browndale Avenue and Approve Request for Purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Bolton-Menk, for Browndale Storm Sewer Realignment, $26,485.00 V.I. Approve Traffic Safety Report of October 2, 2018 V.J. Arden Park Bid Award V.K. Adopt Ordinance No. 2018-16; Adopting Minnesota Food Code V.L. Adopt Revised 2019 Schedule of Meeting Dates V.M. Adopt Resolution No. 2018-121 Opposing the Sale of Wine in Outlets Other Than Authorized Off-Sale Stores Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA V.D. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, AWARDING THE BID TO THE RECOMMENDED LOW BIDDER, ROSENBAUER, THREE FIRE ENGINES AND ONE AERIAL TRUCK, $3,171,028.00 – TABLED TO DECEMBER 4, 2018 The Council noted the significant deviation from past practice to rehab fire trucks and now suggested purchasing all at one time. Mr. Neal recommended tabling this item to the next meeting. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, tabling request for purchase of three fire engines and one aerial truck until the December 4, 2018 regular Council meeting. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. V.E. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE, AWARDING THE BID TO THE RECOMMENDED LOW BIDDER, LIFEQUEST SERVICES, AMBULANCE BILLING AND COLLECTION SERVICES CONTRACT, BILLING SERVICES: 3.5% NET COLLECTIONS ($75,443 BASED ON 2017 FY DATA) COLLECTION SERVICES: 20% OF COLLECTIONS ($10,290 BASED ON 2017 FY DATA) – APPROVED The Council asked reasons why this item was being presented at this time and said they were pleased with the number of vendors responding in the competitive process. The Council stressed the importance of selecting a responsible vendor who would be respectful of debtor rights and inquired about the collection process and if it was more economical to hire this service instead of retaining inhouse. Finance Director Uram explained the previous vendor was acquired by a larger company that had an agreement with the State so the City had to identify a new vendor very quickly. He commented on the challenges of billing due to billing cycles, insurance, and Medicare’s fixed dollar amount, noting an experienced vendor had the expertise to better address collections than staff. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Stewart, to approve request for purchase, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Minutes/Edina City Council/November 20, 2018 Page 3 Lifequest Services, ambulance billing and collection services contract, billing services: 3.5% net collections ($75,443 based on 2017 FY data) collection services: 20% of collections ($10,290 based on 2017 FY data). Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. V.J. APPROVE ARDEN PARK BID – AWARDED Member Fischer stated he would be recusing himself from consideration of this item. The Council asked about bid package structure and why the bid did not include building design. The Council also asked about Bid Alternate 2 for the north loop trail and Bid Alternate 3 warranty for vegetation and why Bid Alternate 1 impervious surfaces was not included. Engineering Services Manager Bintner stated the decision for stormwater management was given to the Watershed and its recommendation was not to include Bid Alternate 1. The Council commented on the tradeoff of stormwater management with a more useable park, requested clearer cost allocation tables in the future, and inquired about alternatives should the bids come in higher than anticipated. Parks and Recreation Director Katreh stated the playground was a set dollar amount and the shelter building should come in under budget. She noted while there was no alternative funding plan other than contingency dollars, should bids come in higher, staff could change the scope and modify the design. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Staunton, to approve award of bid plus Alternates 2 and 3, approve construction administration professional service, approve maintenance covenant, and waive building permit fee for Arden Park Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to Rachel Contracting in the amount of $3,085,904.10. Ayes: Brindle, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Abstain: Fischer Motion carried. VI. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS – None VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD – Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-120: ESTABLISHING WEST 76TH STREET TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT AND MODIFYING SOUTHDALE 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN – ADOPTED Economic Development Manager Neuendorf stated this item pertained to the creation of a new Tax Increment Financing District to support the redevelopment of property at 4100 West 76th Street including the creation of approximately 80 units of affordably-priced rental housing. He said this item also included a second modification to the Plan for the existing Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District to recognize the new TIF District and enable pooling necessary to provide financial support for affordably-priced housing in Edina. He noted that for several years, the City and Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) had made efforts to support new housing that was affordably priced in Edina and special legislation was approved in 2014 and 2017 to provide a local revenue source that could be used to support construction costs without overburdening local taxpayers. This proposed Resolution would enable the second application of the special legislation to support Aeon as they compiled funding for new affordably priced housing at 4100 West 76th Street. He noted the proposed budget of revenues over 20 years would result in just over $2 million in incremental or new revenue. The Council asked about 20-year term and clarified the property would not be affordable housing for only 20 years, but indefinitely. Mr. Neuendorf said the developer had to commit to 25 years of affordable housing but intend to do so longer and that would be included in development contract. The Council asked questions regarding how the proposed budget was considered and modified to be over $31 million. Mr. Neuendorf said the community led us here with the need for affordable housing in the community. Minutes/Edina City Council/November 20, 2018 Page 4 Nick Anhut, Ehlers and Associates, said the budget was developed to provide a loan to Simon Properties to pool money for affordable housing and after analysis of projected activity, created a revenue budget over the next three years that showed $31 million. The Council asked whether this request was conservative or aggressive. Mr. Anhut replied the request was in the middle and noted they worked with Hennepin County and local assessors to create projections that would carry forward for three years and result in other redevelopment, such as the mall and hotel in the block. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. Public Testimony Hope Melton, 4825 Valley View Road, addressed the Council. Frank Lorenz, 7151 York Avenue South, addressed the Council. Barry Rosenthal, 6205 Scotia Drive, addressed the Council. Chris Bremer, 6001 Ewing Avenue South, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Fischer, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. Aubrey Gould, Aeon Development, answered questions regarding affordable housing definitions of 60% AMI or less and for Hennepin County was approximately $96,000. The Council shared comments regarding the school district and other taxing authority levies and the impact on taxpayers. Member Staunton introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-120 Adopting a Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area; Adopting a Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Southdale 2 Tax Increment Financing District Therein; and Establishing the West 76th Street Tax Increment Financing District Therein and Adopting a Tax Increment Financing Plan Therefor. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-113: CONTINUATION OF TEMPORARY PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON FRANCE AVENUE FROM W. 47TH STREET TO MARKET STREET – ADOPTED AS AMENDED Engineering Director Millner stated staff recommended the extension of temporary parking along the west side of France Avenue from Market Street to 47th Street until October 31, 2019. After discussions with adjacent property owners, staff recommended temporary parking restrictions in all areas except from approximately 90 feet north of the driveway for 4824 France Avenue to 49th Street. Mr. Millner noted feedback would be solicited again for reevaluation next fall. The Council confirmed the parking restrictions were temporary and thanked the neighborhood for their input and staff for working with the neighborhood. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-113 relating to parking restrictions on France Avenue from West 47th Street to West 48th Street and West Minutes/Edina City Council/November 20, 2018 Page 5 49th Street to Market Street as amended changing from 50 feet north of the driveway for 4824 France Avenue to 49th Street to 90 feet. Member Stewart seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. RESOLUTION 2018-119 – ACCEPTING VARIOUS GRANTS AND DONATIONS – ADOPTED Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2018-119 accepting various grants and donations. Member Fischer seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Brindle, Fischer, Staunton, Stewart, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX.A. CORRESPONDENCE - Received Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council’s receipt of various correspondence. IX.B. MINUTES – Received 1. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION, OCTOBER 9, 2018 Informational; no action required. X. AVIATION NOISE UPDATE – Received XI. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS – Received XII. MANAGER’S COMMENTS – Received XIII. SCHEDULE OF MEETINGS, EVENTS AND DATES AS OF NOVEMBER 20, 2018 – Received XIV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Sharon Allison, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 4, 2018. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the November 20, 2018, meeting available. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Claims From:Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:Receive Payment of Claims As Per: Pre-List Dated 11.21.18 TOTAL $1,596,585.12 And Pre-List Dated 11.29.18 TOTAL $1,240,184.53 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve claims for payment. INTRODUCTION: Claim information for approval is attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Claims Pre-List Dated 11.21.18 TOTAL $1,596,585.12 Claims Pre-List Dated 11.29.18 TOTAL $1,240,184.53 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 1Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7290 11/21/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 87.46 476291 2303958 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 82.08 476290 2305767 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23.21 476269 2305770 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 192.75 7291 11/21/2018 129624 BARNA GUZY & STEFFEN LTD 32.00 EMPLOYMENT LEGAL ADVICE 476389 193629 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 112.00 EMPLOYMENT LEGAL ADVICE 476388 194801 1170.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RESOURCES 144.00 7292 11/21/2018 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 772.00 476496 23271669.00-2 04440.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Indian Trails B/C 772.00 7293 11/21/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 959.52 476272 0067039000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.55 476271 0067045700 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,366.45 476298 66912000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 455.64 476297 66962600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 577.20 476295 66978700 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,808.05 476294 67038400 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 145.55 476293 67050700 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,546.55 476541 67088500 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.55 476517 67088700 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 109.55 476542 67088800 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 246.12 476296 98598700 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9,446.73 7294 11/21/2018 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 67.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 476493 144629 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 22.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 476492 144636 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 90.03 7295 11/21/2018 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 3,988.80 476138 B149837 01445.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION W 62nd St 799.00 476137 B149838 01447.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Concord A & G 923.75 476136 B149839 01446.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Normandale Park D 5,655.00 476498 B150435 05578.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Vernon Interlachen WM 11,366.55 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 2Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7296 11/21/2018 137533 BUSBY, TREVOR Continued... 1,386.00 BASKETBALL OFFICIALS NOV 476094 1-11/9/18 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 1,386.00 7297 11/21/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 157.91 PAPER, OFFICE SUPPLIES 476181 WO-419061-1 5710.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 27.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 476095 WO-424419-1 1600.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 123.69 SUPPLIES 476139 WO-425083-1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 308.86 7298 11/21/2018 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 169.76 SURFACE KEYBOARD AND PEN 476510 QBG4206 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 169.76 7299 11/21/2018 102519 CHIEF'S TOWING INC 322.59 CARS FOR TRAINING 476574 638044 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 322.59 7300 11/21/2018 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 3,245.77 MN-TF1 UQT1 476394 18005 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 3,245.77 7301 11/21/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 1,172.67 476313 219-0078 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,289.00 476312 219-0079 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,461.67 7302 11/21/2018 104020 DALCO 1,621.90 SIDEWALK SALT 476053 3383302 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 1,621.90 7303 11/21/2018 136484 DIEBEL, BERNARD MICHAEL 499.50 LESSONS 11/1-11/15 476484 1115 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 499.50 7304 11/21/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 41.65 PC PHN REZONING 476147 646933 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 928.20 2019 FEES PH NOTICE 476150 646934 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 202.30 2019 FEES PH NOTICE 476149 646935 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 345.10 TIF DISTRICT PH 476148 646936 9210.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL HRA ADMINISTRATION 1,517.25 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 3Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7304 11/21/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC.Continued... 7305 11/21/2018 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANCE 641.16 OIL 476152 103119 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 641.16 7306 11/21/2018 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 414.00 LESSONS 11/1-11/14 476482 1115 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 414.00 7307 11/21/2018 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 2,291.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 476237 W10399 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 2,291.00 7308 11/21/2018 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 549.00 LESSONS 11/1-11/14 476481 1115 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 549.00 7309 11/21/2018 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 29.76 HIGHLANDS TOILET 476259 140962 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 29.76 PAMELA TOILET 476260 140963 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 29.76 ALDEN TOILET 476261 140964 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 29.76 LEWIS TOILET 476262 140965 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 119.04 7310 11/21/2018 115192 KNUDSON, DEBORAH 513.00 LESSONS 11/1-11/14 476483 1115 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 513.00 7311 11/21/2018 101483 MENARDS 555.25 WATER HEATER 476064 80491 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 662.00 T-POST SNOW PLOW MARKERS 476187 80815 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 168.78 PAINT BRUSHES 476419 80876 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 6.89 PLASTIC DIP COATING 476420 80884 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 79.14 RINK BOARDS 476587 81012 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 148.96 WTP4 PROJECT 476530 81017 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,621.02 7312 11/21/2018 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 5.90 476165 41264 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 36.90 476165 41264 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 4Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7312 11/21/2018 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY Continued... 753.03 476165 41264 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 795.83 7313 11/21/2018 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 780.00 HVAC SERVICE 476112 80667 5761.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 780.00 7314 11/21/2018 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC. 188.25 BACK UP CAMERA 476470 I002473 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 188.25 7315 11/21/2018 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,284.16 BATHROOM/CLEANING SUPPLIES 476254 15001 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 67.59 BATHROOM/CLEANING SUPPLIES 476254 15001 5553.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 609.80 BDAY PLATES, CUTLERY 476173 15030 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,023.17 ICE MELT 476428 15052 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 53.85 ICE MELT 476428 15052 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 333.67 FOAMY CLEANER, SOAP, LINERS 476172 15053 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 336.29 TISSUE, PAPER TOWELS, PURELL 476172 15053 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 3,708.53 7316 11/21/2018 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 1,255.05 ARNESON FOUNTAIN REPAIR 476258 75212 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,255.05 7317 11/21/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 93.49 TOILET PARTS 476060 S3697507.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.35 WATER HEATER COUPLER 476176 S3698109.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 141.84 7318 11/21/2018 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 315.93 PLOW PARTS 476236 50801 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 35.10 PLOW PARTS 476236 50801 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 351.03 7319 11/21/2018 101015 STREICHERS 15.98 RESERVE OFC UNIFORMS 476177 I1338749 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 1,008.50 CSO VEST 476434 I1338946 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 446.99 40MM SIM CONVERSION KIT 476445 I1339642 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,471.47 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 5Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7319 11/21/2018 101015 STREICHERS Continued... 7320 11/21/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 707.65 476286 0220321 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 165.00 476287 0220322 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 892.70 476372 220035 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 535.62 476223 220124-IN 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 122.50 476371 220324 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 165.80 476370 220325 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,589.27 7321 11/21/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,734.40 476224 89220 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,564.80 476373 89221 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 893.20 476564 89669 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 432.40 476528 89709 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,624.80 7322 11/21/2018 101091 ZIEGLER INC 1,060.11 HITCH EXTENSION 476241 PC120071445 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 693.60 CONTRACTED REPAIR 476506 SW050307567 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 899.25 CONTRACTED REPAIR 476504 SWI40164888 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,652.96 430286 11/21/2018 143707 ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP 225.00 GVT STANDARDS SEMINAR 476195 111418 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 225.00 430287 11/21/2018 140086 ABLE SEEDHOUSE AND BREWERY 479.37 476288 E-7999 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 291.50-476289 R120 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 187.87 430288 11/21/2018 143143 ACT CLEANING SERVICES 2,377.64 CLEANING SERVICE 476253 INV-913 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 60.00 CLEANING SERVICE 476253 INV-913 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 377.80 CONTRACT CLEANING 476569 INV-914 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE 2,815.44 430289 11/21/2018 140318 ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND 13,593.95 476579 60656 05564.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS Water Treatment Plant #5 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 6Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430289 11/21/2018 140318 ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND Continued... 13,593.95 430290 11/21/2018 139129 ALERUS RETIREMENT AND BENEFITS 220.00 OCT ALERUS INVOICE 476126 C72544 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 220.00 430291 11/21/2018 105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC. 130.00 OSHA & NFPA COMPLIANT TESTING 476127 INV-38140 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 130.00 430292 11/21/2018 142796 ALL AROUND CONCRETE LLC 72,600.00 CURB AND GUTTER CONTRACT 476246 TIMBER RIDGE R&R CURB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 72,600.00 430293 11/21/2018 141768 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC. 220.23 PUMP, NIPPLE, COUPLER 476468 11056078 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 220.23 430294 11/21/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 69.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 476491 11GM-QK7C-F4DT 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 182.02 CAB HEATER 476451 11GX-HPPG-497G 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 143.76 IT SUPPLIES 476268 11GX-HPPG-H1K9 1554.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 14.94 PART FOR SNOWBLOWER 476502 11GX-HPPG-V3RT 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.00 CITY HALL SHELF 476573 19JV-K63R-44CD 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 103.97 SNOWBLOWER PART 476503 1D64-7JCW-X6VK 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 115.00 SMOKE AND CO DETECTORS FOR FIR 476385 1FHW-6FTL-LNJL 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 27.98 DP TO VGA CABLE FOR SOUTHDALE 476509 1LJ9-GLWJ-R37W 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 170.88 MECHANICS GLOVES 476508 1LVR-1QQG-PJC6 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.99 3M COMMAND STRIPS 476486 1TKT-QRFF-TQ1V 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 94.59 PAID ENTRAANCE STICKERS 476386 1VYF-R6XL-19R3 5552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME ADMINISTRATION 17.85 HITCH PINS 476471 1X3Q-GCMX-H13C 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.95 SAFETY GLASSES 476473 1X3Q-GCMX-H164 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 77.55 MECHANICS GLOVES 476452 1X3Q-GCMX-LCW1 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,094.51 430295 11/21/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 135.86 LAUNDRY 476128 1004303161 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 295.81 476487 1004307673 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 211.65 LAUNDRY 476575 1004309934 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 7Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430295 11/21/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC.Continued... 643.32 430296 11/21/2018 100630 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY 788.00 COPY PAPER 476495 10570333-00 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 788.00 430297 11/21/2018 141972 AP MIDWEST LLC 695,069.83 NORTH RAMP EXP PAY APP #10 476387 APPL 10 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 695,069.83 430298 11/21/2018 135988 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. 914.50 NOV APPRIZE INVOICE 476129 16992 1556.6160 DATA PROCESSING EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 914.50 430299 11/21/2018 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 1,500.00 FRANCE COR. & TRACY RAB IRR 476240 90261 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,500.00 430300 11/21/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 4,345.00 476292 3305833,3305836 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,788.50 476270 3305834 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,219.10 476516 3804160,3304162 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,352.60 430301 11/21/2018 106304 ASPEN MILLS 1,268.94 UNIFORMS 476247 226344 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,268.94 430302 11/21/2018 143705 ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL 5,750.00 APPLICATION FEE 476230 164485 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 5,750.00 430303 11/21/2018 118758 ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL 3,490.01 ENGINE REPAIR 476244 C314445 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,490.01 430304 11/21/2018 102503 BAGS & BOWS 321.08 476130 0096475804 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 321.08 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 8Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430305 11/21/2018 131191 BERNATELLO'S PIZZA INC.Continued... 546.00 PIZZA 476131 4783755 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 546.00 430306 11/21/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 562.36 476205 463849 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,057.60 476299 464134 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,619.96 430307 11/21/2018 134713 BIO LAWN 5,172.80 WEED TREATMENTS 476589 07012018 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 5,172.80 430308 11/21/2018 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 76,822.00 PAY 1 476497 ENG 18-9NB 18' ST. PAVING 05579.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2018 Street Patching 76,822.00 430309 11/21/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 144.00 476116 3401 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 476300 3402 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.00 476301 3403 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 432.00 430310 11/21/2018 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 788.20 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 476132 83031241 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 788.20 430311 11/21/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 119.99 476121 155935 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,389.00 476303 155948 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 363.50 476302 156100 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,872.49 430312 11/21/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 55.27 WIRING HARNESS 475692 55395R 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,077.95 COOLER KIT 475757 55430R 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 112.94 DEFLECTOR, RETAINER 475096 822527X2 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 81.64 DEFLECTOR 475107 822527X3 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 647.70 BRAKE KITS 475094 823094 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.30 DEFLECTOR 475292 823598X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 9Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430312 11/21/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS Continued... 26.16 LENSES 475693 824049X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.12 LENS 475695 824049X2 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.94 TURN LIGHT, HARNESS 475694 824428 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 330.04 RELINED BRAKES 475696 824791 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 687.89 MANIFOLD KIT, GASKETS 476099 825375 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 191.60 STUDS, HARNESS ASY 476101 825375X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.98 HARNESS ASY, GASKET 476462 825375X2 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 194.73 FILTERS 476100 825409 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.05 ANTENNA 476134 825786 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.23 ARM REST 476133 825806 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.90 O RING 476466 825892 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.82 EXHAUST RING 476469 826620 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 232.88-CREDIT MEMO 475291 CM1224192X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,233.08-CREDIT MEMO 475095 CM1234053 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 437.50-CREDIT MEMO 476459 CM55430R 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,000.00-CREDIT MEMO 475100 CM814250 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.32-CREDIT MEMO 475535 CM822527X3 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.00-CREDIT MEMO 475534 CM823094 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.00-CREDIT MEMO 476135 CM824791 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 652.48 430313 11/21/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 657.54 476383 1080882572 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,479.79 476208 1080887520 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.30 476209 1080887521 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,417.41 476207 1080887523 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,465.01 476206 1080887564 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 135.04 476304 1080887565 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 146.30 476305 1080887566 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,296.48 476307 1080887567 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,345.97 476306 1080887568 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,236.58 476543 1080889931 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,651.11 476544 1080889932 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 23,977.53 430314 11/21/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 1,682.90 476117 1090933033 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,046.00 476309 1090933034 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 256.00 476390 1090934246 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 512.00 476308 1090934247 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 10Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430314 11/21/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC Continued... 7,496.90 430315 11/21/2018 140503 BURNSVILLE FIRE DEPARTMENT 4,024.83 MN-TF1 TRENCH 476391 111618B 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 4,024.83 430316 11/21/2018 100676 CAMPBELL, KATY KOCH 40.00 EDINET NEWS & NOTE - ESSIG 476392 2018-2 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 40.00 430317 11/21/2018 143754 CANADIAN PACIFIC 750.00 PIEPLINE APPLICATION 476572 20181119 05578.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN Vernon Interlachen WM 750.00 430318 11/21/2018 143136 CANTEEN REFRESHMENT SERVICES 209.45 COFFEE PRODUCTS 476182 141780000046775 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 209.45 430319 11/21/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 67.05 476310 2187180 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,195.00 476311 2187181 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,338.65 476122 2187182 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,600.70 430320 11/21/2018 143702 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP 1,725.00 LYNDA TRAINING 476267 134566231NV 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,725.00 430321 11/21/2018 100678 CARLSON PRINTING CO. 535.30 RENTAL CONTRACTS 476140 00110643 5760.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 535.30 430322 11/21/2018 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 592.25 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 476141 C1986908 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 691.75 REDIE MIX CONCRETE 476142 C1987316 1301.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,284.00 430323 11/21/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 63.33 476475 1161-11/18 5720.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 168.43 476474 2951-11/18 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 11Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430323 11/21/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK Continued... 226.25 476476 6661-11/18 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 458.01 430324 11/21/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 50.67 LINENS 476570 4010021886 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 15.12 RUG SERVICE 476238 4012086270 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 40.55 RENTAL UNIFORM 476192 4012164634 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 30.80 RENTAL UNIFORM 476193 4012164644 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 41.00 LAUNDRY 476183 4012164686 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 11.78 RENTAL UNIFORM 476194 4012164692 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 52.12 RENTAL UNIFORM 476191 4012164721 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 242.04 430325 11/21/2018 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 25.00 FIRE - TB TESTING 476393 201802 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 25.00 430326 11/21/2018 105246 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 75.00 NTOA TRAINING THREE OFFICERS 476196 11142018175 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.00 430327 11/21/2018 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 17,247.00 SPFD MULTIPLE 476395 00031614 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 17,247.00 430328 11/21/2018 120433 COMCAST 29.07 CABLE 476143 0220686-11/18 5710.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 29.07 430329 11/21/2018 120433 COMCAST 4.75 CABLE TV 476396 0023973-11/18 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 4.75 430330 11/21/2018 141217 CONCEPT HOMES 9,135.00 ESCROW REFUND NEW HOME 476235 147143 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 9,135.00 430331 11/21/2018 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC. 59.46 FIBER EXPANSION MATERIAL 476144 0178322-IN 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 59.46 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 12Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430331 11/21/2018 101329 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS INC.Continued... 430332 11/21/2018 143703 COPLAND, LUCIA 208.00 REFUND CLASS 4351 476384 11.13.18 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 208.00 430333 11/21/2018 140999 CORE-MARK MIDCONTINENT INC. 914.04 CONCESSIONS FOOD 476397 6817875 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 914.04 430334 11/21/2018 140057 CRAFT HOMES LLC 10,000.00 ESCROW REFUND 476233 ED153050 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 430335 11/21/2018 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 306.35 BOTTLED WATER 476145 114-10014090-3- 10/18 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 306.35 430336 11/21/2018 119214 CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC. 281.52 HOSE 476457 94600 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 281.52 430337 11/21/2018 101951 CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC 538.94 ICE MACHINE FAN REPLACEMENT 476146 28840 5720.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 538.94 430338 11/21/2018 141014 DAKOTA COUNTY DOMESTIC PREPAREDNESS 847.61 DCSOT CONCRETE SLABS 476398 111618A 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 847.61 430339 11/21/2018 143711 DANIELSON, CHARLIE 102.00 IRRIGATION WINTERIZATION 476399 20181116 01446.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Normandale Park D 102.00 430340 11/21/2018 116713 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CO., THE 2,790.00 OAK WILT INSPECTIONS 476096 913151523R 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,790.00 430341 11/21/2018 143148 DEVORAK, COREY 30.00 EAC GIFT SHOP 476054 11.13.18 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 13Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430341 11/21/2018 143148 DEVORAK, COREY Continued... 30.00 430342 11/21/2018 101656 EDINA CHORALE 225.00 476151 FALL 18'/SPRING 19' ADS 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 225.00 430343 11/21/2018 122792 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC. 314.40 REPLACE LIGHTBAR DOME 476153 SVC26792 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 314.40 430344 11/21/2018 102497 EXPLORER POST 925 1,347.00 UNIFORM PAYMENT EXPLORERS 476586 WS7150 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 1,347.00 430345 11/21/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 76.56 SEAFOAM 476103 1-5760062 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.08-CREDIT MEMO 476463 1-5760648 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.52 COOLANT 476154 1-5762715 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119.90 GLOVES 476446 158-005509 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 511.21 BATTERIES 476460 1-Z16434 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 171.82 BRAKE LINING, ROTORS 476104 69-331543 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.36 BATTERY 476102 69-331727 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.20 BATTERY 476105 69-331803 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.94 FILTER 476461 69-332013 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.89 BATTERY 476447 69-332492 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 199.06 CONTROL ARMS AND BALL JOINTS 476448 69-332493 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.87 PARKING BRAKE 476450 69-332526 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.77 BATTERY 476501 69-332660 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,305.02 430346 11/21/2018 134984 FAHRNER ASPHALT SEALERS LLC 500.00 476239 508500441-001 01441.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Birchcrest A 500.00 430347 11/21/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 160.94 REPAIR PARTS 476580 0312242 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 650.10 SERVICE LINE SUPPLIES 476581 0312248 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 811.04 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 14Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430348 11/21/2018 113987 FISHER, PETER Continued... 285.27 SUSAR CONFERENCE 476229 111318 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 285.27 430349 11/21/2018 140809 FLAGSHIP RECREATION 1,953.00 BENCH 476256 F7925 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,953.00 430350 11/21/2018 101603 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO. 252.00 476314 35170 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 252.00 430351 11/21/2018 137554 FRED HOLASEK & SON INC. 652.10 SPRUCE TIPS, GREENS, GARLAND 476106 20408 5761.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 652.10 430352 11/21/2018 142024 FSSOLUTIONS 342.25 476585 FL00255530 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 342.25 430353 11/21/2018 143708 GABLER, KAREN 50.00 ETIQUETTE W/ ALICE REFUND 476197 111518 1600.4390.71 SPECIAL EVENTS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 50.00 430354 11/21/2018 102456 GALLS INC. 719.59-CREDIT 476400 011208314 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 637.32 NEW OFFICER HIRE 476155 BC0708867 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 76.00 CSO UNIFORMS 476156 BC0709222 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.59 CSO UNIFORM 476401 BC0714241 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL .32 430355 11/21/2018 141082 GASTERLAND, HANS 250.00 PERFORMANCE ON 12/9/18 476198 120918 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 250.00 430356 11/21/2018 104877 GENERAL SPRINKLER CORP. 464.00 SPRINKLER INSPECTION/CLUBHOUSE 476568 31301 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 464.00 430357 11/21/2018 101103 GRAINGER 57.97 TRAPS, LANTERN 476454 9005221230 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 15Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430357 11/21/2018 101103 GRAINGER Continued... 57.97 430358 11/21/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 129.54 476184 18-05821 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,320.00 476273 MN00048823 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,320.00 476315 MN00048844 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,617.50 476518 MN00049097 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,387.04 430359 11/21/2018 129108 HAAG COMPANIES INC. 87.00 SOIL 476107 2-220889 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 87.00 430360 11/21/2018 101504 HADZIMA, DOMINIC 455.60 FIRE INSPECTOR I 476157 110918 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 455.60 430361 11/21/2018 143443 HAWKINSON, STEPHANIE 89.00 2108 AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUMMIT 476406 10192018 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 25.00 MTG WITH COUNCIL MBR SCHROEDER 476402 10292018 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING 6.00 PARKING FOR MTG W/ MET COUNCIL 476404 10312018 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING 17.51 MTG W COLONIAL OF EDINA PASTOR 476403 11062018 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING 4.95 MTG TRUSTS AND LOAN PROGRAMS 476405 11132018 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING 3.02 MTG WITH CONSULTANT RE LOGO 476407 11142018 1140.6106 MEETING EXPENSE PLANNING 145.48 430362 11/21/2018 139501 HCT 1,547.61 TITLE 476228 110918HCT 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,547.61 430363 11/21/2018 143706 HEIMKES, ANTHONY 285.00 APP FEE REFUND 476231 ED167321 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 285.00 430364 11/21/2018 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 28,317.59 476514 11072018 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 24,547.34 476514 11072018 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 5,889.38 476514 11072018 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 58,754.31 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 16Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430365 11/21/2018 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER Continued... 1,620.80 RADIO FEES 476158 1000118525 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,620.80 430366 11/21/2018 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 979.10 ASSESSING TABLES 476583 88081273 1500.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTINGENCIES 979.10 430367 11/21/2018 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 485.30 FLOOR SCRUBBER BRUSH 476159 700356888 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 485.30 430368 11/21/2018 102483 HILTI INC. 142.65 MOUNTING HARDWARE 476185 4612669232 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES 142.65 430369 11/21/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,642.25 476124 104943 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,141.90 476316 104944 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,784.15 430370 11/21/2018 143559 HOLETS, KARLEE 29.13 COSCTO AND HOME DEPOT 476408 11.16.18 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 29.13 430371 11/21/2018 142744 HP INC. 2,302.28 PC REPLACEMENT 476186 60647597 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,116.19 PC REPLACEMENT 476190 60647624 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,151.14 SENIOR CENTER LAPTOP 476189 60651472 1600.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,151.14 PC REPLACEMENT 476189 60651472 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,720.75 430372 11/21/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 57.65 FILTERS 476108 038067472 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6.45 FILTERS 476109 038067611 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.69 HEATER RELAY 476453 038068174 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.06 SPARK PLUGS, FILTERS 476464 038068207 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.32 FILTER 476467 038068322 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.66 FILTERS 476456 038068324 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.42 LUBRICANTS 476505 038068354 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4.74 FILTER 476449 038068384 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 17Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430372 11/21/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC Continued... 72.94 LUBRICANTS 476458 038068509 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 280.93 430373 11/21/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 387.45 476317 70835 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 378.90 476210 70836 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 766.35 430374 11/21/2018 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 198.50 PBT REPAIR 476409 612542 2340.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE 198.50 430375 11/21/2018 140123 JACOBS, TRAVIS 121.86 WORK BOOTS 476410 111618 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 121.86 430376 11/21/2018 102186 JAZZ ON THE PRAIRIE BIG BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE ON 12/2 476199 120218 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 430377 11/21/2018 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 156.00 476055 10/18-UTILITIES 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 161.82 476055 10/18-UTILITIES 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 317.82 430378 11/21/2018 143537 JIRIK SOD FARMS 1,409.80 SOD TO PATCH THIN AREAS FWYS 476571 42017 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,409.80 430379 11/21/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 44.40 476115 2804137 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,337.70 476319 2894539 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,884.90 476212 2894540 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 73.80 476211 2894541 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21.50 476318 2894542 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,864.80 476213 2894543 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21.50 476214 2894544 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 18,248.60 430380 11/21/2018 138216 JOHN KRAEMER AND SONS 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 18Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430380 11/21/2018 138216 JOHN KRAEMER AND SONS Continued... 10,000.00 ESCROW REFUND 476232 ED152444 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 430381 11/21/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,419.99 476327 1140744 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2.38 476340 1146305 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,362.36 476339 1146307 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,644.28 476338 1146308 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,209.89 476337 1146309 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,590.91 476336 1146310 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 356.01 476335 1146311 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,639.67 476334 1146312 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 427.36 476341 1146317 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 586.09 476279 1151996 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 290.26 476278 1151997 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,642.32 476277 1151998 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 805.16 476276 1151999 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 534.03 476275 1152000 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,026.64 476274 1152001 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 73.80 476321 1152002 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,302.80 476330 1152003 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 83.19 476322 1152004 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,201.98 476325 1152005 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,798.47 476331 1152006 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,345.78 476323 1152007 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,039.03 476324 1152008 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 49.19 476320 1152009 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 898.27 476328 1152010 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,150.27 476329 1152011 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 232.38 476326 1153413 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 199.00 476520 1155710 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 100.79 476523 1155711 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 476.43 476521 1155712 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 694.21 476522 1155713 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 220.56 476519 1155714 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,395.20 476545 1155715 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 680.33 476548 1155716 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,164.84 476546 1155717 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,558.15 476547 1155718 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 772.52 476549 1155719 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 19Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430381 11/21/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.Continued... 1,348.91 476550 1155720 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 414.96 476551 1155721 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.50-476118 509087 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 476.38-476119 509106 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 160.19-476333 509252 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19-476332 509254 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 45,078.15 430382 11/21/2018 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 37.19 FUSES AND FLASHLIGHT 476200 1174697 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 37.19 430383 11/21/2018 102603 JONAS, LENORE 84.57 GIFT GALLERY - CUB AND COSTCO 476411 11.16.18 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 84.57 430384 11/21/2018 106338 KAUFMAN ROOFING 149.99 4407 COUNTRY CLUB RD 476578 163375 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 149.99 430385 11/21/2018 139688 KEEPSAKE CIDERY LLP 121.66 476215 50111418 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 121.66 430386 11/21/2018 137525 KERNS, JOHN 150.00 PERFORMANCE ON 12/6/18 476201 120618 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 430387 11/21/2018 138279 KFT FIRE TRAINER LLC 243.28 SMOKE FLUID CONTAINER 476160 160.00002436 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 243.28 430388 11/21/2018 143474 KNUDSEN, ED 8.40 EAC GIFT SHOP 476056 11.13.18 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 8.40 430389 11/21/2018 129813 LA VALLEUR, BARBARA 90.00 EAC SALE OF 'VANISHING WONDER'476063 11.13.18 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 90.00 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 20Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430390 11/21/2018 143544 LADY A LITERARY Continued... 1,000.00 SALES COMM. FOR MAP 476412 2 1130.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,000.00 430391 11/21/2018 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 15.01-CREDIT MEMO 475880 01-608784 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50.74 WIPER ARM AND BLADE 476465 01-620550 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.11 WEDGES , SCREW 476455 01-620824 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.84 430392 11/21/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 1,552.99 PLOW BOLTS, WASHERS, NUTS 476245 9306264849 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 103.55 STAINLESS CAP SCREWS 476413 9306279356 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 1,656.54 430393 11/21/2018 134957 LEACH LAW OFFICE LLC 21,278.80 OCT ATTORNEY FEES 476414 0656.001-10/18 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 21,278.80 430394 11/21/2018 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 24,049.52 3RD Q HOME WC INVOICE 476416 3RD QTR BILLING 2018 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 24,049.52 430395 11/21/2018 138211 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 3,241.63 LMC OCT WC DEDUCTIBLE 476415 1003628-11/18 6002.6200 INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 3,241.63 430396 11/21/2018 141192 LOCALE DESIGN BUILD LLC 10,000.00 ESCROW REFUND 476577 ED154686 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 430397 11/21/2018 142007 LUNNEBORG, MEGAN 9.81 OCT. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 476444 11/14/18 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 9.81 430398 11/21/2018 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 325.00 476280 16774 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 325.00 476342 16775 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 650.00 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 21Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430399 11/21/2018 102237 MANGEN, DEBRA Continued... 84.91 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 476161 11-09-2018 1180.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ELECTION 84.91 430400 11/21/2018 127763 MARTECK 144.01 INVOICE #188071 476417 188071 1556.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 144.01 430401 11/21/2018 122554 MATHESON TRI-GAS INC. 141.81 TF-1 EQUIPMENT 476576 18654997 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 141.81 430402 11/21/2018 142349 MAX TREE FARM 5,625.00 TREES BETWEEN DR & #9 476567 1311-18 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 5,625.00 430403 11/21/2018 143704 MCCARTY, STEPHEN 200.00 PERFORMANCE ON 12/16/18 476202 121618 5710.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 430404 11/21/2018 125287 MCDONOUGH'S SEWER SERVICES, INC. 158.76 CLEAN FLOOR DRAIN IN WEST COMP 476418 178945 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 158.76 430405 11/21/2018 142910 MCMANAMON, KERSTEN 84.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 476057 11132018 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 84.75 430406 11/21/2018 101987 MENARDS 827.50 T POST SNOW STAKES 476582 60433 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 827.50 430407 11/21/2018 100885 METRO SALES INC 2,244.30 QTRLY DESKTOP PRINTER MAINT 476162 INV1206034 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,244.30 430408 11/21/2018 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 348.00 VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 476163 309 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 348.00 430409 11/21/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 22Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430409 11/21/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued... 32.32 SWITCH 476164 510383 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.90 SWITCH ASY 476110 510853 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 61.22 430410 11/21/2018 100890 MIDWEST AQUA CARE 220.00 REMOVE FOUNTAINS 476485 FOUNTAIN SRV. 11/18 5761.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 220.00 430411 11/21/2018 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 14,091.36 476515 431-0005.300-11 /18 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 14,091.36 430412 11/21/2018 116770 MINNEAPOLIS FIRE DEPARTMENT 15,478.10 MFD UQT1 476421 102318 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 19,297.94 111418 476422 111418 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 34,776.04 430413 11/21/2018 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 507.63 DOME FURNACE REPAIR 476531 3148221-00 5210.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 507.63 430414 11/21/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 45.00 REHS/RS RENEWAL 476590 11202018 1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 45.00 430415 11/21/2018 136248 MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 187.67 TRACTOR PARTS 476264 P78686 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 187.67 430416 11/21/2018 100231 MINNESOTA POST BOARD 180.00 POST LICENSE X2 476204 11152018175 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 180.00 430417 11/21/2018 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,205.00 476243 81051 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,205.00 430418 11/21/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 23Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430418 11/21/2018 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS Continued... 43.00 SWTV PRINTING RACK CARDS 476166 26301 1132.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CABLE COMMISSION 43.00 430419 11/21/2018 142003 MN CLN SERVICES INC. 1,797.65 476423 0418JJ04 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,984.67 476424 0518JJ03 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,984.67 476425 0618JJ04 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,984.67 476426 0718JJ04 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 7,751.66 430420 11/21/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 630.00 476281 E-1139 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 630.00 430421 11/21/2018 141377 MONTGOMERY BREWING COMPANY LLC 261.00 476343 110518_EDINAYOR K 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 261.00 430422 11/21/2018 143339 MR CUTTING EDGE 190.00 SHARPEN ZAM BLADES 476255 252 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 190.00 430423 11/21/2018 100920 NAPA AUTO PARTS 10.99 STABILIZER FOR GAS FOR WINTER 476533 3599-000482 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 259.25 OIL FILTERS FOR MOWERS 476532 3599-998514 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 88.16 COUPLER 476111 3599-998708 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 358.40 430424 11/21/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 804.00 476344 137191 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 578.00 476216 137192 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 468.00 476552 137341 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 774.00 476524 137342 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,624.00 430425 11/21/2018 124528 NORTHEAST WISCONSIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 4,500.00 FORCE ON FORCE 476167 SFT0000117020 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 4,500.00 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 24Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430426 11/21/2018 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC Continued... 694.84 STROBE LIGHTS 476507 46903 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 694.84 430427 11/21/2018 143696 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CENTERS OF MN, P.C. 231.50 476584 102870692 1556.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 231.50 430428 11/21/2018 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 915.47 OVERHEAD CRAIN INSPECTION 476472 627921 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,042.64 HOIST REPAIR 476242 628403 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 77.34 CABLE 476588 628990 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 2,035.45 430429 11/21/2018 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC 516.00 476123 E-3471 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 894.00 476345 E-3540 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,410.00 430430 11/21/2018 101659 ORKIN 26.02 RAMP PEST CONTROL 476489 173687160 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 26.02 RAMP PEST CONTROL 476488 173688075 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 30.00 RAMP PEST CONTROL 476490 173688900 4090.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 82.04 430431 11/21/2018 139830 PARAMOUNT INVESTMENT GROUP LLC 9,135.00 ESCROW REFUND NEW HOME 476234 147128 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 9,135.00 430432 11/21/2018 131698 PARLEY LAKE WINERY 132.00 476346 17466 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 168.00 476553 17470 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 300.00 430433 11/21/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 1,069.75 476381 30228 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 680.75 476217 30237 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,069.75 476219 30238 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,346.75 476218 31171 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,380.24 476227 31182 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,592.48 476382 31190 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 25Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430433 11/21/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY Continued... 326.00 476554 31799 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11,465.72 430434 11/21/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 505.16 CONCESSIONS FOOD 476427 86245601 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 505.16 430435 11/21/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1.19 476356 2452634 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 327.57 476353 2452635 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,598.65 476354 2452638 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 928.94 476352 2452639 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1.19 476355 2452644 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 822.38 476347 2456735 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 411.19 476285 2456736 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,106.28 476350 2456738 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 312.54 476282 2456739 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,309.06 476283 2456740 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 447.06 476351 2456741 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,711.78 476349 2456742 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 244.45 476348 2456743 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,245.95 476555 2459565 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 742.76 476526 2459566 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,054.80 476525 2459567 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,982.51 476557 2459568 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 321.32 476558 2459570 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,228.28 476556 2459572 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 45.19 476559 2459573 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 20.00-476560 311658 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6.75-476561 311659 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21,816.34 430436 11/21/2018 100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 224.80 WIPER BLADES 476168 01BF7796 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 224.80 430437 11/21/2018 102423 PLAISTED COMPANIES INC 147.00 BLOCK WALL 476113 46513 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 147.00 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 26Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430438 11/21/2018 143699 PLATT, KAREN Continued... 1.05 EAC GIFT SHOP 476058 11.13.18 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1.05 430439 11/21/2018 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 46.68 PEST CONTROL 476169 6117755 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.68 430440 11/21/2018 143468 PORTAGE BREWING COMPANY 624.00 476562 41 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 624.00 430441 11/21/2018 106072 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC. 6,205.00 BRAEMAR ACAD9 MAINT 476511 16176 5960.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEER SERVICES - STORM 6,205.00 430442 11/21/2018 138292 PRECISE IRRIGATION 4,420.00 IRRIGATION BLOWOUT 476170 2860 5761.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 4,420.00 430443 11/21/2018 131064 PRECISION PRINTING INC. 1,731.10 PLAYERS CARDS/PASSES 476534 3495 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,731.10 430444 11/21/2018 129706 PREMIUM WATERS INC. 58.24 WATER 476171 622833-10-18 5710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 58.24 430445 11/21/2018 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 440.00 476563 1-3938 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 440.00 430446 11/21/2018 135833 QUALITY FORKLIFT 1,464.87 TEREX PARTS 476257 141891 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,464.87 430447 11/21/2018 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 353.00 476357 K-35337146 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 8.40 476527 K-35337177 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 361.40 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 27Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430448 11/21/2018 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE Continued... 175.00 476188 20181110033928 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 175.00 SAFETY BBOTS 476188 20181110033928 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 350.00 430449 11/21/2018 134496 REFINED LLC 10,000.00 NEW HOME 5933 ST JOHNS AVE 476535 161093 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 430450 11/21/2018 139188 REVOLUTIONARY SPORTS LLC 1,837.85 REVSPORTS FALL 476174 EDINA PR 2018-3 1626.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS CAMP 1,837.85 430451 11/21/2018 124119 RJM DISTRIBUTING INC. 109.90 476429 IND017483 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 109.90 430452 11/21/2018 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 136.23 476120 18-06276 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 320.46 476358 18-06278 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 695.75 476359 18-06412 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,152.44 430453 11/21/2018 141532 ROSEMOUNT FIRE DEPARTMENT 270.00 ROSEMOUNT FIRE UQT1 476430 111618C 7510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MN TF 1 ADMINISTRATION 270.00 430454 11/21/2018 139439 RUE 38 LLC 364.50 476226 4354 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 364.50 430455 11/21/2018 134173 SAFE-FAST INC. 61.92 SAFETY GLASSES 476175 INV207899 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 61.92 430456 11/21/2018 100995 SEH 413.25 WETLAND MONITORING 476536 358413 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 13,850.10 476537 359336 05572.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM-572 RAW WTR WELL 21 TO WTP 14,263.35 430457 11/21/2018 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 28Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430457 11/21/2018 104098 SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP Continued... 49,838.60 MS EA AGREEMENT 476431 B08467793 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 49,838.60 430458 11/21/2018 101556 SHRED-IT USA 170.04 SHREDDING 476248 8125875860 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 170.04 430459 11/21/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 450.00 TEE DIVIDER FABRICATION 476432 13536 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 195.00 TEE DIVIDER - AQUATIC CENTER 476432 13536 5310.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER POOL ADMINISTRATION 645.00 430460 11/21/2018 140283 SMSC ENTERPRISES 320.00 TREE DISPOSAL 476263 SALES0000000050 08 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 320.00 430461 11/21/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 53.68 476222 1752174 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,307.28 476225 1752175 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,188.80 476221 1752176 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,315.20 476220 1752177 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,298.35 476367 1752178 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .93 476365 1752179 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9,592.68 476379 1752180 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,301.70 476380 1752181 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,020.80 476378 1752182 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,021.60 476366 1752183 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,270.88 476363 1752184 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,740.00 476361 1752185 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,179.12 476364 1752186 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,081.20 476362 1752187 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,539.86 476360 1753654 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 42,912.08 430462 11/21/2018 142441 SPINOSA, PAT 2.40 EAC GIFT SHOP 476059 11.13.18 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2.40 430463 11/21/2018 134700 SPOK INC. 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 29Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430463 11/21/2018 134700 SPOK INC.Continued... 189.80 PAGERS 476265 B0319246W 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 189.80 430464 11/21/2018 143710 ST LOUIS PARK FIRE DEPARTMENT 78.40 UNIFORMS 476433 CLOTHING-EDINA RECRUIT 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 78.40 430465 11/21/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 605.00 476368 24496 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 160.00 476369 24497 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 765.00 430466 11/21/2018 142442 STORCK, SUSAN 39.60 EAC GIFT SHOP 476061 11.13.18 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.60 430467 11/21/2018 143698 STORM COMBATIVES TRAINING & CONSULTATION 2,100.00 SWAT COMBATIVES TRAINING 476062 0016 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,100.00 430468 11/21/2018 133512 SUDDATH RELOCATION SYSTEMS 1,750.00 PICK UP EQUIP FROM POLLS 11-7 476500 556650 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 1,750.00 MOVE EQUIP TO POLLS 11-5 476499 556655 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 3,500.00 430469 11/21/2018 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 510.73 CONCESSION PRODUCT 476178 247147979 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 510.73 430470 11/21/2018 143712 TARNOWSKI, SUSAN 53.66 GIFT GALLERY REIMBURSEMENT 476435 11.16.18 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 53.66 430471 11/21/2018 101029 TESSMAN COMPANY, THE 258.64 6 SPOOLS OF BRAIDED ROPE 476538 S283177-IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 258.64 430472 11/21/2018 102798 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST 686.80 INVEST. BACK GROUNDS 476266 839197667 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 30Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430472 11/21/2018 102798 THOMSON REUTERS - WEST Continued... 686.80 430473 11/21/2018 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL INC. 487.00 DRAFT CC MINUTES 11/7 476494 M24276 1185.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 487.00 430474 11/21/2018 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 2,073.00 HORNETS NEST RTU INDUCER & CON 476436 18868 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,073.00 430475 11/21/2018 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT 260.04 HARNESS 476179 P01383 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 260.04 430476 11/21/2018 101046 TWIN CITY FILTER SERVICE INC. 303.24 FILTERS 476437 0647280-IN 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 223.56 AIR FILTERS 476438 0647435-IN 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 526.80 430477 11/21/2018 103973 ULINE 98.62 WORK GLOVES FOR EMOLOYEES 476251 102842542 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 98.62 430478 11/21/2018 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC. 865.00 INSTALL REACH LIFT 476440 162366334-001 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 6,698.68 INSTALL BASKET LIFT 476439 162472405-001 5553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 7,563.68 430479 11/21/2018 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 570.13 ADAPTERS FOR METERS 476539 738794 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 570.13 430480 11/21/2018 102275 VAN BLOEM GARDENS 186.30 BULBS FOR SPRING 476180 5591983 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 186.30 430481 11/21/2018 143709 VAN ORNUM, IAN 120.00 LIFE DRAWING MODEL 476203 11.15.18 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 120.00 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 31Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430482 11/21/2018 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE Continued... 650.00 AR&LE DESIGN 476252 MV2018-13 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 650.00 430483 11/21/2018 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 37.38 WELL 11 VFD PARTS 476250 S002073084.001 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL PUMPS 385.36 WELL 11 VFD PARTS 476249 S002073084.002 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS WELL PUMPS 249.27 LIGHTING CONTROLS - TOM OFFIC 476441 S002088696.001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 87.74 HWY 100 PED BRIDGE 476442 S002088825.001 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 759.75 430484 11/21/2018 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 567.10 DIESEL 476540 62513 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 567.10 430485 11/21/2018 131648 WENCK ASSOCIATES INC. 5,339.21 TRAFFIC STUDY 476097 11807682 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 5,339.21 430486 11/21/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,619.66 476375 7208161 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,971.37 476377 7208162 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,000.70 476284 7209272 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,977.18 476374 7209273 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,488.28 476529 7210058 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 322.38 476566 7210059 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,076.66 476565 7210061 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 12,456.23 430487 11/21/2018 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC. 495.52 UNIFORMS 476443 E1773604 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 495.52 430488 11/21/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,034.48 476479 614322070 4090.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 8,588.88 476480 614325654 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,313.33 476477 614353156 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5,067.28 476478 614416474 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 17,003.97 430489 11/21/2018 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:53:52R55CKR2LOGIS101 32Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/21/201811/21/2018 -- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430489 11/21/2018 120099 Z WINES USA LLC Continued... 121.00 476376 20896 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 121.00 1,596,585.12 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,537,332.51 59,252.61A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 1,596,585.12 11/20/2018CITY OF EDINA 11:54:01R55CKS2LOGIS100 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 11/21/201811/21/2018 - Company Amount 321,424.1501000GENERAL FUND 198.5002300POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 9,077.6304000WORKING CAPITAL FUND 6,313.5504100PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 8,964.5505100ART CENTER FUND 957.6305200GOLF DOME FUND 195.0005300AQUATIC CENTER FUND 18,210.3805400GOLF COURSE FUND 36,390.9005500ICE ARENA FUND 7,874.8105550SPORTS DOME FUND 4,765.0305700EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 6,607.4005750CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 250,856.0205800LIQUOR FUND 129,865.2805900UTILITY FUND 6,977.0005930STORM SEWER FUND 27,291.1506000RISK MGMT ISF 4,789.9607400PSTF AGENCY FUND 60,411.2507500MN TASK FORCE 1 FUND 345.1009210HRA ADMINISTRATION 695,069.8309232CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT Report Totals 1,596,585.12 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 1Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7323 11/29/2018 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 118.88 477195 118.88 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 119.44 476853 2302139 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 86.05 477175 2305768 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 75.79 477076 2309589 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 400.16 7324 11/29/2018 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 780.97 CITY HALL COFFEE 477108 1345515 1120.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 780.97 7325 11/29/2018 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 17,019.00 476966 23271675.00-2 03510.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS SS Trunk Ext - York Phase 1 17,019.00 7326 11/29/2018 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 740.00 476860 0067171900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,840.41 476857 66681900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 76.89 476858 66809800 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 678.95 477151 66911900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 269.10 477173 66979300 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,644.10 477174 67038200 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 370.65 477198 67088300 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.55 477199 67088900 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,636.60 477072 67122600 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 376.40 476859 98524800 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 128.00 477160 98597800 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 366.11 477160 98597800 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9,212.76 7327 11/29/2018 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 500.00 476603 B149836 04423.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION Parklawn Ave 2,721.94 CONCRETE TESTING 476604 B150776 47102.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES BRIDGE RPLCMT 3,221.94 7328 11/29/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS 56.09 SUPPLIES 476607 WO-426219-1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 16.17 SUPPLIES 476608 WO-426568-1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 71.84 SUPPLIES 476605 WO-426738-1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 17.92 SUPPLIES 476842 WO-426738-2 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 14.00 476606 WO-426774-1 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 2Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7328 11/29/2018 100648 BUSINESS ESSENTIALS Continued... 14.00 476606 WO-426774-1 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 14.00 476606 WO-426774-1 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 204.02 7329 11/29/2018 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 25,474.59 ATTORNEY 476961 2851G-10/18 1196.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CITY ATTORNEY 25,474.59 7330 11/29/2018 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 940.37 OCT 65% XCEL 477260 7184 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 940.37 7331 11/29/2018 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 302.63 SEPT 65% XCEL 477261 7185 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 302.63 7332 11/29/2018 130477 CLEAR RIVER BEVERAGE CO 200.00 476881 191-0818 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 200.00 7333 11/29/2018 104020 DALCO 217.89 KAIVAC CLEANING SOLUTION 476617 3386267 5720.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 1,115.31 PARKS SUPPLIES 476686 3386289 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,333.20 7334 11/29/2018 132810 ECM PUBLISHERS INC. 77.35 RECYCLING ORGANICS BID 476620 648789 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 41.65 PUBLISH AMEND COMP PLAN PH 476621 648790 1185.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL LICENSING, PERMITS & RECORDS 829.57 NORTH RAMP EXP - WAYFINDING 477186 649347 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 948.57 7335 11/29/2018 100768 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & MFG INC 346.66 WEST WATER LEAK REPAIRS 477013 W10456 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 346.66 7336 11/29/2018 129508 IMPACT 3,360.69 NOVEMBER MAILINGS 476633 136675 5902.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BILLING - FINANCE 3,360.69 7337 11/29/2018 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC. 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 3Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7337 11/29/2018 102146 JESSEN PRESS INC.Continued... 908.50 AR&LE PRINTING 476634 680673 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 908.50 7338 11/29/2018 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 96.00 BOXCRYPTOR FORENSIC SOFTWARE 476979 579129993 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,008.95 SUMURI FORENSIC SOFTWARE 476978 62501 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,104.95 7339 11/29/2018 101792 LUBE-TECH 2,710.26 LUBRICANTS 476698 1273527 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,710.26 7340 11/29/2018 101483 MENARDS 17.02 SHELF BIN 476980 081338 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 35.94 EP ENTRY LIGHTW 476637 80882 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 68.69 CONSTRUCTION SUPPLIES 476841 81191 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 8.97 GENERAL SUPPLIES 476850 81227 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 521.84 4X4X8' CEDAR POST 476981 81250 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 157.76 CLEANING SUPPLIES 476982 81261 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 63.49 LAMPS AND MAT. HANDLING 477060 81270 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 43.97 SOUTH FILL HOSE 477009 81288 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 57.74 WEST ZAM VALVE LEAK 477016 81312 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 975.42 7341 11/29/2018 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 3,907.00 NEW RIMS FOR LOADER 476705 210374193 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,140.00 BOBCAT TIRES 476643 210376371 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 285.00 BOBCAT TIRES 476643 210376371 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 5,332.00 7342 11/29/2018 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 415.50 BDAY PLATES, CUPS 476644 15087 5720.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 415.50 7343 11/29/2018 101000 SOULO COMMUNICATIONS 63.74 BUS CARDS NICK K 477110 102473 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 63.74 BUS CARDS FINBERG 477111 102474 5760.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES ADMIN EXPENSE 127.48 7344 11/29/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC. 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 4Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 7344 11/29/2018 101004 SPS COMPANIES INC.Continued... 180.65 WTP4 PROJECT 477063 S3703568.001 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 180.65 7345 11/29/2018 119454 VINOCOPIA 547.00 476891 218989 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 34.50 476890 218990 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 127.50 477124 219366 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,132.50 477125 219367 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 535.62 476910 220036 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 349.15 477222 220326 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.74-477223 220579 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.74-477223 220579 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.74 477223 220579 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.74 477223 220579 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 333.74 477223 220579 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 115.00 477081 220879 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,175.01 7346 11/29/2018 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 352.62 CONCESSIONS FOOD 476653 53386222 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,533.74 CONCESSIONS FOOD 476654 53455619 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 48.52-ACCOUNT CREDIT 477006 53482112 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,837.84 7347 11/29/2018 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 294.30 476909 88423 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 358.30 476663 90038 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 652.60 7348 11/29/2018 132553 YALE MECHANICAL 1,961.62 HP REPAIR 476717 192082 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,961.62 7349 11/29/2018 101091 ZIEGLER INC 3,322.53 COMPRESSOR IRRIGATION BLOWOUT 476719 F1552901 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,322.53 430490 11/29/2018 142327 56 BREWING, LLC 128.00 476852 5603666 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 128.00 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 5Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430490 11/29/2018 142327 56 BREWING, LLC Continued... 430491 11/29/2018 133164 AAA AUTO PARTS 838.00 BUMPER ASY 476591 1627515 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 838.00 430492 11/29/2018 133522 AARP DRIVER SAFETY PROGRAM 90.00 AARP SMART DRIVING 476592 11152018 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 90.00 430493 11/29/2018 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 104.71 HVAC FOR TOM'S OFFICE 477059 712724 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 104.71 430494 11/29/2018 143143 ACT CLEANING SERVICES 549.87 OCT. CLEANING 476680 INV-884 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,641.82 CLEANING SERVICE 476849 INV-885 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 3,191.69 430495 11/29/2018 140318 ADVANCED ENGINEERING AND 2,978.58 SCADA INTEGRATION 477017 60524 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 2,978.58 430496 11/29/2018 141960 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES 136.62 FOR LT OLSON 476596 14TR-H49H-DH1T 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 59.25 PLOW MARKERS 477044 163C-K91Y-RHP1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,270.67 PC COMPONENTS 476593 16M9-H7YF-1LMH 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 57.95 ROUTER\SWITCH 476878 19JV-K63R-JWYD 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 149.78 IT SUPPLIES 476976 1KXN-XV14-L6RH 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 257.60 BOOKS RACIAL EQUITY 477112 1LVR-1QQG-PW19 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 240.99 IT SUPPLIES 476977 1P6W-HNXV-6XJY 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 8.08 BATTERY PROTECTOR 476594 1VYF-R6XL-611L 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 57.16 SPRAY BOTTLES 476595 1X3Q-GCMX-DN9L 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 8.99 476967 1XXX-C99P-HDXK 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,247.09 430497 11/29/2018 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES INC. 167.22 477134 1004312959 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 150.19 477138 1004315119 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 317.41 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 6Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430498 11/29/2018 143776 ANDERSON, CAROL Continued... 48.67 UTILITY REFUND 477100 11-26-2018 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 48.67 430499 11/29/2018 143775 ANTIL, CATHERINE L 357.30 UTILITY REFUND 477099 11-26-2018 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 357.30 430500 11/29/2018 137556 ARCHITECTURE FIELD OFFICE 3,500.00 COMP. PLAN 476597 201833 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 1,087.50 AFO - REVIEW OF 7200 PROJECT 476598 201834 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 4,587.50 430501 11/29/2018 132031 ARTISAN BEER COMPANY 30.53-477154 3272937CR 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,340.30 476855 3304161,3304163 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,736.50 477162 3305837 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,586.20 476665 3307055 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,525.20 477071 3307056 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,524.50 477197 3307057 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 144.75-476856 441022 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 573.70-477073 441023 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,193.50 476854 8302817 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 15,157.22 430502 11/29/2018 140424 AXON ENTERPRISE INC. 11,550.00 TASER PURCHASE YEAR 1 477114 SI-1562683 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 11,550.00 430503 11/29/2018 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 271.84 UPS BATTERY REPLACEMENT 476896 018-P8314530 421130.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT 271.84 430504 11/29/2018 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 8.00 GREEN TABLE LINENS 476984 111618 1130.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 9.00 BLACK PIPE AND DRAPE 476984 111618 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 120.00 EDINA TV JACKETS 476984 111618 1130.6410 VIDEO PRODUCTION SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 137.00 430505 11/29/2018 143760 BERGERON, ED 13.47 REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES 476681 11212018 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 7Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430505 11/29/2018 143760 BERGERON, ED Continued... 13.47 430506 11/29/2018 125139 BERNICK'S 20.00 476862 462462 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,410.10 476861 462463 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,450.72 476666 465213 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 60.00 477078 465245 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,159.62 477077 465246 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 113.39-477196 465247 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 113.39-477196 465247 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 113.39 477196 465247 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 113.39 477196 465247 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,549.39 477196 465247 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 969.95 477161 484135 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,619.78 430507 11/29/2018 126847 BERRY COFFEE COMPANY 597.00 CONCESSIONS FOOD 476599 611054 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 412.65 CONCESSIONS FOOD 477007 612240 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,009.65 430508 11/29/2018 140365 BIKO ASSOCIATES INC. 7,650.00 COMP. PLAN 476600 11 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 7,206.26 COMP. PLAN 476601 21 4428.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Comprehensive Plan 2018 14,856.26 430509 11/29/2018 134713 BIO LAWN 115.00 FERTILIZER TREATMENT 476602 11012018 1653.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CENTER MAINTENANCE 166.00 FERTILIZER TREATMENT 476602 11012018 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 281.00 430510 11/29/2018 142153 BLACK STACK BREWING INC. 477.00 476863 3361 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 126.00 476864 3452 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 189.00 477075 3453 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 126.00 477194 3454 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 918.00 430511 11/29/2018 143779 BODOR, ADRIENNE 97.00 REFUND ART CLASS 4340 477102 11.27.18 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 8Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430511 11/29/2018 143779 BODOR, ADRIENNE Continued... 97.00 430512 11/29/2018 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 1,080.50 477201 155949 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 251.50 477079 156112 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 371.25 476667 156113 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 422.90 477200 156114 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 812.25 477202 156276 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,938.40 430513 11/29/2018 117040 BOYER TRUCKS 41.07 BELT 477041 15165D 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 153.62 JUNCTION BOX 477045 15195D 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.00 HARNESS 477029 825375X3 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 253.69 430514 11/29/2018 123621 BRAEMAR ARENA 850.67 DREAM FALL (SEPT.) ICE 477257 3249 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 936.00 DREAM ICE (OCT.) FALL 477258 3326 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 1,786.67 430515 11/29/2018 124291 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,891.57 477128 1080882221 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 584.62 477123 1080884075 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,243.73 477129 1080884076 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,311.76 477130 1080884077 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,804.34 477131 1080887522 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 726.90 477191 1080889026 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,426.50-477235 1080889927 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,426.50 477235 1080889927 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,426.50 477235 1080889927 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 765.92 477234 1080889928 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 185.65 476668 1080889929 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 530.14 476669 1080889930 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,626.39 476887 1080892054 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16,097.52 430516 11/29/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC 40.00-477227 1090907795CR 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,703.40 476912 1090930256 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 9Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430516 11/29/2018 124529 BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER LLC Continued... 3,261.70 477171 1090933031 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.50 477172 1090933032 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 238.50 477192 1090934245 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,613.58 477237 1090936262 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 79.50 477236 1090936263 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,340.00 476670 1090936264 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 7,627.35 477088 1090936265 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 36.80 477089 1090936266 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 509.95 477229 1090938181 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 27.40 477228 1090938182 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 21,477.68 430517 11/29/2018 100826 CANTON, JANET 34.39 2018 MILEAGE 477262 112118 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 34.39 430518 11/29/2018 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 191.80 477142 191 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 42.00 477120 2104269 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,958.00 477119 2184270 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,752.70 477153 2187179 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 67.05 477207 2189914 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.35 476671 2189916 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 28.00 477069 2189917 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 792.25 477206 2189918 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 313.80 476672 2189919 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,406.65 477070 2189920 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,980.60 477066 2192366 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 22.35 477209 2192367 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 588.95 477210 2192368 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16,166.50 430519 11/29/2018 123898 CENTURYLINK 66.88 477002 6522-11/18 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 66.88 430520 11/29/2018 142533 CES IMAGING 69.75 CANON LEASE 476968 INV093691 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 209.25 CANON LEASE 476968 INV093691 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 279.00 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 10Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430520 11/29/2018 142533 CES IMAGING Continued... 430521 11/29/2018 100683 CHEMSEARCH 657.77 WATER TREATMENT SERVICE 476609 3334689 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,877.07 PUMPS AND CONTROLLERS 477015 3340545 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,534.84 430522 11/29/2018 141762 CHIRPICH, EVAN 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 476682 ALCOMPNOV18C 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 430523 11/29/2018 142028 CINTAS CORPORATION 20.00 SHOP RAGS 476683 4012397831 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.55 UNIFORM RENTAL 476610 4012441983 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 52.12 RENTAL UNIFORM 476614 4012442034 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.00 LAUNDRY 476612 4012442047 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 15.70 RENTAL UNIFORM 476613 4012442051 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.80 RENTAL UNIFORM 476611 4012442079 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 200.17 430524 11/29/2018 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 PHONES, I-NET 476956 COM-1692 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 100.00 430525 11/29/2018 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 5,847.34 PW WATER 476684 0345052006-11/1 8 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5,847.34 430526 11/29/2018 100692 COCA-COLA DISTRIBUTION 400.96 476880 3638207550 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 400.96 430527 11/29/2018 120433 COMCAST 33.87 CABLE TV 477163 0373022-11/18 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.87 430528 11/29/2018 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 14,143.08 476685 181115 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 14,143.08 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 11Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430529 11/29/2018 104928 CONCRETE CUTTING & CORING INC.Continued... 81.37 REPAIR CHAINSAW 476846 3794 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 81.37 REPAIR SAW 477064 8143 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 162.74 430530 11/29/2018 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 190.56 476615 INV000129935 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 190.56 430531 11/29/2018 100012 CORE & MAIN 154.04 TOOLS FOR NEW CHASE TRUCK 476843 J818295 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 154.04 430532 11/29/2018 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 585.04 60TH UNIFORM SHIRTS 476616 61214 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 585.04 430533 11/29/2018 103013 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 20.00 477256 2019 CARDS 5820.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 50TH STREET GENERAL 20.00 477256 2019 CARDS 5840.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20.00 477256 2019 CARDS 5860.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 60.00 430534 11/29/2018 143023 DUNBAR ARMORED INC 291.54 476618 4268929 5821.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 291.54 476618 4268929 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 291.56 476618 4268929 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON OCCUPANCY 295.38 476619 4304180 5821.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 295.38 476619 4304180 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 295.39 476619 4304180 5861.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,760.79 430535 11/29/2018 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS 256.86 ROPE 476687 123444-IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 256.86 430536 11/29/2018 143758 ECKSTEIN, ANNA 40.00 TRAINING MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 476825 201811175 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 430537 11/29/2018 134601 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES INC. 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 12Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430537 11/29/2018 134601 EMMONS & OLIVIER RESOURCES INC.Continued... 841.54 FRED RICHARDS/WETLAND BANK HYD 476874 01169-0007-6 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 841.54 430538 11/29/2018 133170 ENERGIE INNOVATION INC. 57,550.00 BRAEMAR ARENA SOUTH RINK LOW E 476962 2018-363 2710.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CAS ADMINISTRATION 57,550.00 430539 11/29/2018 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 19.13 SWAY BAR LINKS 476625 1-5763060 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 128.93 BELTS 476623 1-5765680 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.85 WHEEL HUB 476631 1-5771903 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.74 FUEL CONDITIONER 477042 1-5773500 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 111.96 BATTERY 476628 158-005708 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.03 BATTERIES 477028 1-Z16521 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 817.43 SHOCKS, BRAKE DRUMS 476622 69-332310 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1.59 WHEEL STUD 476624 69-332454 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.96 BATTERY 476626 69-332793 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 115.52 FILTER, TRANS FLUID 476627 69-332939 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.84 LINK KIT, BUSHING 476629 69-332990 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.06 LINK KIT 476630 69-332996 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 257.13 WHEEL HUB, BRAKES 477031 69-333002 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 140.03 BATTERIES 477039 69-333121 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.99 WIPERS 477040 69-333177 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,040.19 430540 11/29/2018 143765 FARR PLUMBING & HEATING 105.10 DUPLICATE 476877 167481 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 105.10 430541 11/29/2018 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 2,292.87 METERS 476688 0311080-1 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 613.15 METERS 477062 0311080-2 5917.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES METER REPAIR 235.29 BATTERY FOR READER 476847 0312119 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 3,141.31 430542 11/29/2018 126444 FISH WINDOW CLEANING 3,200.00 CITY HALL WINDOWS 476689 2315-28770 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 3,200.00 430543 11/29/2018 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 13Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430543 11/29/2018 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY Continued... 386.60 O-RINGS FOR CAMERA HEAD 477061 23161 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 386.60 430544 11/29/2018 141764 FRITCHLEY, ABIGAIL 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 476690 ALCOMPNOV18F 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 430545 11/29/2018 105508 GEMPLER'S 40.84 FIRST AID KIT GOLF DOME 476691 SI04328966 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 40.84 FIRST AID KIT MAINTENANCE 476691 SI04328966 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.84 FIRST AID KIT CLUBHOUSE 476691 SI04328966 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 122.52 430546 11/29/2018 103185 GERTENS 150.54 DELIVERY CHARGE ICE MELT 476692 41063/6 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 150.54 430547 11/29/2018 139115 GONYEA HOMES 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW 3509 54TH ST W 476876 164273 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 430548 11/29/2018 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 758.75 477159 758 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 678.50 477158 MN00048462 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,320.00 477205 MN00048955 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 137.75 477208 MN00049149 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,895.00 430549 11/29/2018 132968 GREAT NEIGHBORHOOD HOMES INC. 2,500.00 DEMO ESCROW REFUND 476693 165589 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 430550 11/29/2018 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 23,947.21 DEC HP INVOICE-NONACTIVES 476964 85482872 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 277,774.90 DEC HP INVOICE-ACTIVES 476965 85509824 6002.6040 HOSPITALIZATION RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 301,722.11 430551 11/29/2018 143562 HEINZMANN, DAN 23.00 S-B LICENSE RENEWAL 477095 11262018 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 23.00 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 14Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430551 11/29/2018 143562 HEINZMANN, DAN Continued... 430552 11/29/2018 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,515.00 476879 103536 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 701.70 476673 106431 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,603.00 477067 106432 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 922.00 477212 106433 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,071.00 477215 107516 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,812.70 430553 11/29/2018 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 316.29 CHLORINE, ACID 477109 181105015 5720.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 316.29 430554 11/29/2018 142744 HP INC. 15,400.80 PC REPLACEMENT 477113 60662889 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,150.96 EB 830 FOR JEFF BROWN 476814 60663097 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 16,551.76 430555 11/29/2018 102562 IAFCI 80.00 IAFCI 2019 DUES 476694 11212018175 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 430556 11/29/2018 125032 IEH AUTO PARTS LLC 3.18 WIPERS 476632 038068735 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.69 FILTERS 477030 038069051 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.87 430557 11/29/2018 131544 INDEED BREWING COMPANY 1,501.40 476674 71068 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,280.00 477068 71069 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,556.75 477214 71070 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,338.15 430558 11/29/2018 140123 JACOBS, TRAVIS 52.69 PICTURE FRAMES 476955 112118 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 52.69 430559 11/29/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5,414.00 476882 2894516 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5.50-477177 2894517 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 15Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430559 11/29/2018 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN Continued... 1,186.55 476675 2894569 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,350.85 477084 2894570 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25.55 477085 2894571 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,383.15 477213 2894572 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 51.10 477211 2894573 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 279.00 476676 2894579 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11,684.70 430560 11/29/2018 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. .30 477107 1140740 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 960.90 477106 1140753 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 382.04 477105 1140754 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,419.99 477104 1140755 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,361.02 477204 1146318 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,619.31 477193 1146319 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 185.05 477203 1146321 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,994.98 477221 1152014 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,570.59 477220 1152015 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,884.57 477218 1152016 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 111.19 477217 1152017 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,380.68 477219 1152018 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 358.35 477216 1152019 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 6,137.14 477255 1152020 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 844.56 477252 1155722 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 140.78 477251 1155723 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,410.60 477254 1155724 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,483.09 477233 1155725 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 464.95 477232 1155726 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 541.39 477253 1155727 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 554.75 477231 1155728 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 39.60-477087 510417 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 16.17-477087 510417 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 219.33-476677 510917 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 476.38-477086 511610 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 32,054.75 430561 11/29/2018 137201 KEYPER SYSTEMS 52.04 477003 104828 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 52.04 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 16Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430562 11/29/2018 136686 KIDCREATE STUDIO Continued... 156.00 THANKSGIVING PROJECT 477259 9614 1630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARTNERSHIP PROGRAMS 156.00 430563 11/29/2018 124825 KLOBE, ANNE MARIE 100.00 JURY SHOW AWARD 477051 11.13.18 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 100.00 430564 11/29/2018 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 314.00 AQUARIUM MAINTENANCE 477115 AQUARIUM SRV NOV/DEC 18' 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 314.00 430565 11/29/2018 142814 KOURAJIAN, NICK 36.35 REFILL PETTY CASH 477103 07.25.18 5111.6201 LAUNDRY ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 42.00 REFILL PETTY CASH 477103 07.25.18 5111.6201 LAUNDRY ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 298.75 REFILL PETTY CASH 477103 07.25.18 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 377.10 430566 11/29/2018 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 185.00 TOW FEE CASE #18001136 477004 81673 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 185.00 430567 11/29/2018 133050 LARSON, CINDY 10.03 MILEAGE 10/2/18 AND 10/4/18 476657 11212018 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 10.03 430568 11/29/2018 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 1,396.83 NUTS, BOLTS, TERMINALS 476695 9306279355 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,396.83 430569 11/29/2018 143755 LEDERMANN, ADRIENNE 70.96 COMFORT MAT FOR DESK 476635 111918 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 70.96 430570 11/29/2018 130046 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA 1,266.36 NOV ACC AND CI INVOICE 476696 NOVEMBER 2018 9900.2033.28 ACCIDENT AND CRITICAL INS PAYROLL CLEARING 1,266.36 430571 11/29/2018 136027 LINA 4,812.70 NOV LTD INVOICE 476697 0416005118-11/1 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 17Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430571 11/29/2018 136027 LINA Continued... 8 4,812.70 430572 11/29/2018 141838 LUCID BUILDERS 2,500.00 ESCROW REFUND 476699 ED162939 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 2,500.00 430573 11/29/2018 141916 LUPULIN BREWING 195.00 477168 16776 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 195.00 430574 11/29/2018 142525 MALLOW, SAMANTHA 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 476700 ALCOMPNOV18M 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 430575 11/29/2018 134063 MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 235.67 FUEL 477022 21065251 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 175.11 FUEL 477020 21065253 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.67 FUEL 477021 21065254 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 215.90 FUEL 477019 21065255 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 295.16 FUEL 477025 21065269 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 167.69 FUEL 477024 21065271 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 345.63 FUEL 477026 21065272 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 368.19 FUEL 477023 21065273 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 115.26 FUEL 477027 21065274 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.87 FUEL 477032 21065664 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14,042.56 FUEL 476701 240006 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16,123.71 430576 11/29/2018 143777 MARK PROPERTIES LLC 85.00 UTILITY REFUND 477101 11-26-2018 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 85.00 430577 11/29/2018 143762 MARKED BY IMAGINATION 405.89 MGA YARDAGE INSERTS 476951 2307 5400.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS GOLF BALANCE SHEET 405.89 430578 11/29/2018 142503 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC 3,826.36 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 07149.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Concord A/G 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 18Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430578 11/29/2018 142503 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING INC Continued... 25.33 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 01439.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Chowen Park D 128.25 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 01448.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Country Club C 1,390.61 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 01277.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Zenith/York Alley 1,407.90 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 01439.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Chowen Park D 1,613.34 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 01278.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS York Alley 42,458.55 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 01447.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Concord A & G 712.50 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 05575.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Country Club C 6,275.70 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 05568.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Chowen Park D 14,236.94 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 03506.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Concord A/G 34,797.66 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 05574.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Concord A/G 10,247.18 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 04424.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Chowen Park D 24,194.93 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 04432.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Concord A/G 25,654.47 PAY #7 476636 ENG 18-3 PAYMENT 7 04424.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Chowen Park D 166,969.72 430579 11/29/2018 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,584.00 ST. PAUL LIGHTS TOUR 477065 11/18 LIGHTS TOUR 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,584.00 430580 11/29/2018 100885 METRO SALES INC 241.78 COPIER RENTAL ELECTIONS 476638 INV1211936 1180.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ELECTION 241.78 430581 11/29/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE 375.00 RADIO 476639 510931 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 375.00 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 19Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430581 11/29/2018 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAIRIE Continued... 430582 11/29/2018 139880 MID CITY SERVICES - INDUSTRIAL LAUNDRY 44.00 RUG LAUNDERING 477050 91654 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.00 430583 11/29/2018 142453 MIDWEST ASPHALT SERVICES, LLC 7,068.00 PAY #7 477189 NORMANDALE PAY 7 07152.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 915.80 PAY #7 477189 NORMANDALE PAY 7 01450.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Bredesen Park A 40,849.89 PAY #7 477189 NORMANDALE PAY 7 01446.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 14,278.94-PAY #7 477189 NORMANDALE PAY 7 05576.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 4,560.00-PAY #7 477189 NORMANDALE PAY 7 05577.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Bredesen Park A 380.00 PAY #7 477189 NORMANDALE PAY 7 03509.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Bredesen Park A 988.00 PAY #7 477189 NORMANDALE PAY 7 03508.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 6,893.08 PAY #7 477189 NORMANDALE PAY 7 04434.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS Normandale Park D 38,255.83 430584 11/29/2018 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.38 477135 180120480 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 21.51 477137 180120481 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 16.13 477136 180120482 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 43.02 430585 11/29/2018 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 79.87 477263 20908 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 79.87 430586 11/29/2018 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 CFM REGISTRATION 476702 11202018 (2)1490.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH 35.00 430587 11/29/2018 143713 MITTELSTADT, RICHARD 75.00 EAC JURY STIPEND 476983 11.16.18 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 20Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430587 11/29/2018 143713 MITTELSTADT, RICHARD Continued... 75.00 430588 11/29/2018 134703 MJL HOMES LLC 10,000.00-NEW HOME ESCROW REFUND 476703 154940 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 NEW HOME ESCROW REFUND 476703 154940 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 NEW HOME ESCROW REFUND 476703 154940 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 430589 11/29/2018 100899 MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 190.00 BOILER CERTIFICATION 477011 ABR02005901 5511.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 190.00 430590 11/29/2018 140955 MODIST BREWING LLC 1,822.50 476883 12861 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 172.00 476884 12904 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,192.50 477169 E-1140 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 562.50 477083 E-1244 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 172.00 477230 E-1264 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 172.00 477074 E-1266 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,093.50 430591 11/29/2018 111803 MONSON, JAN & MITCHELL 3,504.13 PAY#6-NORAMP-3945 EASEMENT 477182 11-27-2018 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,504.13 430592 11/29/2018 102776 MRPA 2,254.00 2019 MRPA DUES 476704 112019 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 2,254.00 430593 11/29/2018 127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 87.64 VERIZON 476963 11-16-2018 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 1,412.88 MILEAGE 476963 11-16-2018 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 1,500.52 430594 11/29/2018 123954 NEIGHBORHOOD NETWORKS PUBLISHING 112.00 476957 N10601126 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 112.00 430595 11/29/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 179.00 476885 136935 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 21Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430595 11/29/2018 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.Continued... 1,262.00 476886 137190 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 236.00 477238 381 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,677.00 430596 11/29/2018 142821 NICKLASSON ATHLETIC COMPANY 1,561.00 FLAG FOOTBALL SHIRTS 476640 30517 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 1,561.00 430597 11/29/2018 106619 NIEFELD, SUSAN 242.00 REFUND FOR YOGA CLASSES 476998 11212018 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 242.00 430598 11/29/2018 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 675.70 LENS, LIGHT ASY 477043 46941 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 675.70 430599 11/29/2018 102712 OFFICE OF MN.IT SERVICES 142.68 LANGUAGE LINE 477188 W18100672 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 142.68 430600 11/29/2018 142885 OLIPHANT BREWING 90.00 477239 2453 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 90.00 430601 11/29/2018 141965 OMNI BREWING COMPANY LLC 709.65 477150 E-3470 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 709.65 430602 11/29/2018 100347 PAUSTIS WINE COMPANY 852.87 476900 29947 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 74.25 476678 31817 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 36.25 477224 31827 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 963.37 430603 11/29/2018 100945 PEPSI-COLA COMPANY 277.50 477141 1002 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,040.20 CONCESSIONS FOOD 476848 86845701 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,317.70 430604 11/29/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 22Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430604 11/29/2018 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS Continued... 1,027.66 477152 0470476 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,973.87 476898 2448841 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 5,122.25 476897 2448842 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 386.29 476899 2448846 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 4,093.26 477167 2452640 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 130.38 477166 2452642 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 411.19 477181 2456737 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 2,662.65 477179 2456744 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 314.57 477180 2456745 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,245.95 477243 2459563 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,245.95 476641 2459564 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,483.20 477242 2459569 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 519.31 477241 2459571 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 928.45 477244 2459574 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 130.38 477240 2459575 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 24,675.36 430605 11/29/2018 134664 PICA HEAD START 49.00 REFUND FOR OVERPAYMENT 477097 792936 5701.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK REVENUES 49.00 430606 11/29/2018 130926 PLANTSCAPE INC. 2,223.86 PLANT MAINTENANCE 476642 351499 5720.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 2,223.86 430607 11/29/2018 142500 PLM LAKE AND LAND MANAGEMENT CORP 1,257.00 ARROWHEAD LATE SEASON TRTMT 477190 13763 5936.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARROWHEAD LK VEGETATION CONTRO 1,257.00 430608 11/29/2018 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 60.00 476959 6123449 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 60.00 430609 11/29/2018 143618 PRYES BREWING COMPANY 943.00 476901 1-3796 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 220.00 477225 1-3939 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,163.00 430610 11/29/2018 139392 Q-FREE TCS INC. 320.00 WAY FIND PROGRAMING 477058 11944 4090.6530 REPAIR PARTS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 23Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430610 11/29/2018 139392 Q-FREE TCS INC.Continued... 320.00 430611 11/29/2018 143756 RACOM CORPORATION 23,968.00 INSTALL FOR STATION ALERT SYS.476706 181NV1270 4626.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Fire Station Alerting System 23,968.00 430612 11/29/2018 138298 RED BULL DISTRIBUTION COMPANY INC. 216.00 477176 216 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 216.00 430613 11/29/2018 134496 REFINED LLC 10,000.00 NEW HOME ESCROW REFUND 476707 157451 1495.4109 CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT INSPECTIONS 10,000.00 430614 11/29/2018 106036 REITER, JERRY 21.37 NORTHERN 457592 04-06-2018 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 21.37 430615 11/29/2018 142471 RICH, ANDREA 179.74 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 476974 112618 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 179.74 430616 11/29/2018 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 935.18 SOFTNER SALT 476645 363399 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 19.09 SOFTNER SALT 476645 363399 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 954.27 430617 11/29/2018 127774 ROOTSTOCK WINE COMPANY 1,142.70 477165 18-06277 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 136.23 477226 18-06545 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,278.93 430618 11/29/2018 134173 SAFE-FAST INC. 48.50 UNIFORM SWEATSHIRT 477005 INV208312 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 48.50 430619 11/29/2018 137771 SAND CREEK GROUP LTD, THE 1,247.52 LEADERSHIP COACHING 477046 96252 1556.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE SHARED SERVICES 1,247.52 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 24Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430620 11/29/2018 143759 SAVIK, KRISTINE Continued... 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 476708 ALCOMPNOV18S 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 430621 11/29/2018 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 3,254.71 HVAC FILTERS FOR BUILDING 476709 143975 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 3,254.71 430622 11/29/2018 101556 SHRED-IT USA 55.90 SHREDDING FEES 477187 8126067308 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.90 430623 11/29/2018 120784 SIGN PRO 185.00 UNITED HEALTH DASHER AD 476851 13638 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 269.90 NO DOGS ON COURSE SIGNS 476952 13639 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 116.00 477139 13651 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 116.00 477139 13651 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 116.00 477139 13651 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 394.13 477140 13654 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 1,197.03 430624 11/29/2018 127004 SIGN SOURCE INC. 25,660.00 NORTH RAMP EXP EAST SIGNAGE 477185 59006 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 25,660.00 430625 11/29/2018 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 43.85 TIMECLOCK RENTAL 476646 13087132 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 43.85 430626 11/29/2018 100430 SNAP-ON INDUSTRIAL 17.20 SCREWDRIVERS 476647 ARV/38013260 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 734.00 RATCHET KITS 477018 ARV/38048396 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 751.20 430627 11/29/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 508.25 476889 1746777 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET .40 477122 1749489 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 347.60 476904 1749490 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,204.18 476903 1749491 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,054.17 477121 1749492 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 88.80 476905 1749493 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 25Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430627 11/29/2018 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS Continued... 996.92 476888 1753655 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,714.10 476679 1754850 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 633.66 476659 1754851 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,955.20 476660 1754852 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 713.43 477093 1754853 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,621.16 477090 1754854 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 3,658.80 477094 1754855 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 140.80 477092 1754856 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 10.27 477091 1754857 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 963.97 477246 1754858 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,928.80 477247 1754859 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,310.70 477245 1754860 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 994.80 476906 5034829 5800.1352 LIQUOR INVENTORY LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 25,846.01 430628 11/29/2018 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 74.64 NEWS PAPER SUBSCRIPTION 476710 10129303-11/18 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 74.64 430629 11/29/2018 133068 STEEL TOE BREWING LLC 857.00 476902 24361 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 327.00 477082 24618 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 160.00 476661 24619 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,344.00 430630 11/29/2018 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 39.90 USED TIRE DISPOSAL 476648 10157467 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.90 430631 11/29/2018 135803 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 6,229.20 NOV SUN LIFE INVOICE-ACTIVES 476711 237716-001-11/1 8 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 244.60 NOV SUN LIFE INVOICE-NONACTIVE 476712 237716-901-11/1 8 6002.6043 COBRA INSURANCE RISK MGMT EMP SHARED SERVICE 6,473.80 430632 11/29/2018 101756 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC. 3,684.91 NORTH RAMP EXP- SURVEY 476811 53025 9232.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 3,684.91 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 26Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430633 11/29/2018 137673 SWEETLAND ORCHARD LLC Continued... 240.00 476662 2608 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 240.00 430634 11/29/2018 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 614.06 CONCESSION PRODUCT 476649 247159522 5730.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH CONCESSIONS 537.05 CONCESSIONS FOOD 477014 247170481 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 1,151.11 430635 11/29/2018 134673 TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES INC. 447.88 MUNTERS BELTS 477012 18881 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 447.88 430636 11/29/2018 103218 TRI-STATE BOBCAT 4,404.40 BOBCAT SNOW BLOWER 477010 S23963 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,101.10 BOBCAT SNOW BLOWER 477010 S23963 5553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPORTS DOME BLDG&GROUNDS 5,505.50 430637 11/29/2018 130874 UNITED RENTALS (NORTH AMERICA) INC. 887.40 SOUTH LIGHT REPLACEMENT 477008 162880194-001 5511.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 887.40 430638 11/29/2018 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 390.81 476650 482922-00 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 105.01 476651 482924-00 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 616.29 476953 482925-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 23.89 476954 482926-00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,136.00 430639 11/29/2018 101064 VESSCO INC. 1,360.50 WTP4 PROJECT 476713 74797 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,360.50 430640 11/29/2018 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC. 494.01 LED TRACK REPLACEMENTS 476652 S002072532.002 5720.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 64.52 CONDUIT FOR PLANT 4 476845 S002097806.001 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 182.21 PARTS FOR WELL 11 VFD 476844 S002100327.001 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL PUMPS 740.74 430641 11/29/2018 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS 201.80 CONCESSIONS FOOD 476655 112439 5520.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA CONCESSIONS 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 27Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430641 11/29/2018 133629 VON HANSONS MEATS Continued... 201.80 430642 11/29/2018 103088 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN 78.11 VV PARK TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 92.56 FS 2 TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 129.90 FS 1 TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 221.46 SEN CENTR TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 376.96 CITY HALL TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 546.28 ROSLAND 476714 0047339-2808-1 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 771.07 PW MAINT TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 771.07 PW TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,132.36 ROSLAND PARK TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 93.49 ART TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 185.09 GOLF DOME TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 323.96 POOL TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 231.87 BRAE MAINT TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 458.92 CLB HOUSE TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 1,662.36 ARENA TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,063.51 EDBOU TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5720.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH OPERATIONS 122.36 GV LIQUOR TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 180.09 YORK LIQUOR TRASH 476714 0047339-2808-1 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 9,441.42 430643 11/29/2018 135181 WATERFORD OIL COMPANY INC. 284.19 DIESEL FOR FUEL TANK 476715 62531 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 566.58 DIESEL TO FILL UP COMPRESSOR 476716 62547 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 850.77 430644 11/29/2018 124942 WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING 104,254.00 6301 CHOWEN AVE. FUNDING 476658 11-8-2018 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 104,254.00 430645 11/29/2018 143773 WESTERLING, DONNA 97.00 EAC CLASS REFUND 477098 11.26.18 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 97.00 430646 11/29/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 8,653.68 476907 7207090 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 19.19 476908 7207091 5800.1355 INVENTORY MIX & MISC LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,690.78 477170 7209274 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:28R55CKR2LOGIS101 28Page -Council Check Register by GL Council Check Register by Invoice & Summary 11/29/201811/29/2018-- Inv No Account No Account Description Business UnitDoc NoCheck #PO #SubledgerSupplier / ExplanationDateAmount 430646 11/29/2018 101312 WINE MERCHANTS Continued... 93.19 477248 7210060 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,789.09 477249 7210062 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 1,367.80 476913 89222 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 13,613.73 430647 11/29/2018 142220 WOODEN HILL BREWING COMPANY 240.00 476892 1295 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 140.00 476911 1317 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 70.00 476664 1324 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 105.00 477080 1325 5800.1354 INVENTORY BEER LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 555.00 430648 11/29/2018 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 892.00 AUAR TRAFFIC 476656 R-011179-000-10 4422.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES 892.00 430649 11/29/2018 101726 XCEL ENERGY 1,661.73 476870 615274009 5761.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES OPERATING 1,661.73 430650 11/29/2018 130618 YOUNGSTEDTS COLLISION CENTER 10,049.43 CONTRACTED REPAIR 476718 18711 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10,049.43 430651 11/29/2018 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 85.00 477250 20914 5800.1353 INVENTORY WINE LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 85.00 1,240,184.53 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Checks 1,153,734.61 86,449.92A/P ACH Payment Total Payments 1,240,184.53 11/28/2018CITY OF EDINA 10:19:40R55CKS2LOGIS100 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 11/29/201811/29/2018 - Company Amount 162,440.2701000GENERAL FUND 104,254.0002100CDBG FUND 185.0002300POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 10,894.3602500PEDESTRIAN AND CYCLIST SAFETY 57,550.0002700CONSERVATION & SUSTAINABILITY 47,345.7004000WORKING CAPITAL FUND 88,789.6704100PIR CONSTRUCTION FUND 11,821.8404200EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,265.8905100ART CENTER FUND 225.9305200GOLF DOME FUND 952.8505300AQUATIC CENTER FUND 6,598.8305400GOLF COURSE FUND 20,254.2805500ICE ARENA FUND 1,405.1905550SPORTS DOME FUND 6,495.3005700EDINBOROUGH PARK FUND 1,725.4705750CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK FUND 231,756.7405800LIQUOR FUND 68,135.9705900UTILITY FUND 69,989.6605930STORM SEWER FUND 301,966.7106000RISK MGMT ISF 144.0007400PSTF AGENCY FUND 33,678.6109232CENTENNIAL TIF DISTRICT 12,308.2609900PAYROLL FUND Report Totals 1,240,184.53 Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Robert Wilson, City Assessor Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-122: Approving Deferral of Special Assessments Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution 2018-122 approving deferral of special assessments. INTRODUCTION: State Statutes and City policy allow the deferment of special assessments for property owners who meet the required eligibility standards of age and income, or disability and complete an application. One application for deferment has been received. The applicant qualifies for the deferral. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No 2018-122 RESOLUTION NO. 2018 - 122 APPROVING DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, certain applications and authorization for deferral of special assessments have been received by the City of Edina from property owners seeking to have the special assessments for their properties deferred as allowed by provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193 to 435.195 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council: The following application satisfies the criteria for deferral of special assessments and is hereby granted: PID PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS LEVY NO. 33-117-21-33-0029 Jerry Thomas 5205 61st Street West 19988 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 4th day of December, 2018 ATTEST: ___________________________ __________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of _________________ , 20___. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Stephanie Hawkinson, Affordable Housing Development Manager Item Activity: Subject:Fair Housing Policy Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Fair Housing P olicy INTRODUCTION: The City of Edina strives to advance its commitment to inclusion and equity by developing a Fair Housing P olicy to affirmatively further the goal of creating a vibrant, safe, and healthy community where all residents will thrive. This policy addresses some of the goals outlined by the Race and Equity Task Force. Furthermore, the Metropolitan Council now requires the adoption of a Fair Housing Policy in order for a City to be eligible to receive Livable Communities funding. ATTACHMENTS: Description Fair Housing Policy ☐City Council Approved: Click here to enter a date. ☐City-Wide Revised: Click here to enter a date. ☐Department City of Edina Policy Fair Housing Policy 1. PURPOSE AND VISION Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act establishes federal policy for providing fair housing throughout the United States. The intent of Title VIII is to assure equal housing opportunities for all citizens. Furthermore, the City of Edina, as a recipient of federal community development funds under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, is obligated to certify that it will affirmatively further fair housing. The City of Edina strives to advance its commitment to inclusion and equity by developing this Fair Housing Policy to further the goal of creating a vibrant, safe, and healthy community where all residents will thrive. 2. POLICY STATEMENT It is the policy and commitment of the City of Edina to ensure that fair and equal housing opportunities are available to all persons in all housing opportunities and development activities funded by the City regardless of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, creed, familial status, national origin, or disability. This is done through external policies to provide meaningful access to all constituents as well as fair housing information and referral services; and through internal practices and procedures that promote fair housing and support the City’s racial equity and inclusion goals. 3. EXTERNAL PRACTICES A. Intake and Referral The City of Edina has designated the Staff Liaison to the Human Rights & Relations Commission as the responsible authority for the intake and referral of all fair housing complaints. At a minimum the Staff Liaison will be trained in state and federal fair housing laws, the complaint process for filing discrimination complaints, and the state and federal agencies that handle complaints. The date, time, and nature of the fair housing complaint and the referrals and information given will be fully documented. The Human Rights & Relations Commission will advise the City Council on City programs and policies affecting fair housing and raise issues and concerns where appropriate. Page | 2 B. Meaningful Access i. Online Information. The City of Edina will continue to display information about fair housing prominently on its website. The website will continue to include links to various fair housing resources, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Minnesota Department of Human Rights, Mid-Minnesota Legal Aid, and others as well as links to state and federal fair housing complaint forms. In addition, the City will post the following documents on its website: • Reasonable Accommodation Policy; • Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Policy; • Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Policy regarding access to City services; and • The State of Minnesota’s Olmstead Plan. ii. In-Person Information. The City of Edina will provide in-person fair housing information including: • A list of fair housing enforcement agencies; • Frequently asked questions regarding fair housing law; and • Fair housing complaint forms for enforcement agencies C. Languages. The City of Edina is committed to providing information in the native language of its residents. The City of Edina will provide information in languages other than English as described in its LEP Policy. 4. INTERNAL PRACTICES The City of Edina commits to the following steps to promote awareness and competency regarding fair housing issues in all of its government functions. a. Staff and Officials Training. The City will continue to train its staff and officials on fair housing considerations. b. Housing Analysis. The City will review its housing periodically to examine the affordability of both rental and owner-occupied housing to inform future City actions. Page | 3 c. Code Analysis. The City will review its municipal code periodically, with specific focus on ordinances related to zoning, building, and occupancy standards, to identify any potential for disparate impact or treatment. d. Project Planning and Analysis. City planning functions and development review will consider housing issues, including whether potential projects may perpetuate segregation or lead to displacement of protected classes. e. Community Engagement. The City will seek input from underrepresented populations in the community. Conversations regarding fair housing, development, zoning, and land use changes may be facilitated by the City. f. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. As a recipient of federal funds, the City agrees to participate in the Regional Analysis of Impediments, as organized by the regional Fair Housing Implementation Council (FHIC), an ad hoc coalition of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement jurisdictions and others working together to affirmatively further fair housing. The City will review the recommendations from the analysis for potential integration into City planning documents, including the Consolidated Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and other related documents. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Jessica V. Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Execute Cost Share Agreement with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for Installation of Segmented Blades on Five City Plow Trucks to Reduce Chloride Use Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Cost Share Agreement and Maintenance Plan with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for installation of segmented blades on five city plow trucks to reduce chloride use. INTRODUCTION: Cost share agreement and grant application attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Cost Share Agreement and Maintenance Plan NMCWD 2018 Cost Share Agreement 1 NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT COST SHARE PROGRAM Cost Share Agreement between NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT and the City of Edina The parties to this Cost Share Agreement are the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD), a public body with purposes and powers set forth at Minnesota Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D, and the City of Edina (CITY), a body corporate and politic and a city of the State of Minnesota. The purpose of this Agreement is to install segmented blades on five City of Edina plow trucks (the Property). NMCWD commits to reimburse CITY in accordance with the terms and on satisfaction of the conditions of this agreement. 1. Scope of Work CITY will install segmented plow blades on five City of Edina plow trucks in accordance with the Site Plan, Work Plan and Budget attached to and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit A. CITY will submit to the NMCWD at least one report that includes a narrative describing the construction of the Project, a description of and receipts documenting eligible costs incurred including in-kind contributions, a description of any changes made or expected to the Project and photographs documenting construction (Project Report). A final Project Report must be submitted to the NMCWD within 30 days of the completion of construction. 2. Reimbursement On receipt and approval of a Project Report and the Project is complete, functional and conforming to Exhibit A, and inspection by NMCWD, NMCWD will reimburse CITY seventy-five (75) percent of CITY’s eligible costs to design and construct the Project. Reimbursement under this Agreement will not exceed a total of $33,000.00. Expenditures for nonnative plants used in the Project are not eligible for reimbursement. NMCWD has determined that partial performance of obligations under section 1 of this agreement may confer no or limited benefit on NMCWD. As a result: a. NMCWD may withhold 10 percent of any reimbursement under this section 2 until NMCWD has confirmed substantial completion of the Project; and b. if construction, including vegetation establishment where specified, of the Project is not completed in material conformance with the approved plans and specifications within one (1) year of the date this agreement is fully executed, subject to delays outside of CITY’s control, NMCWD will not be obligated to provide reimbursement to CITY under this NMCWD 2018 Cost Share Agreement 2 agreement and may declare this agreement rescinded and no longer of effect. Notwithstanding, the parties will consult before NMCWD makes a decision to deny reimbursement or rescind the agreement. Further, absent NMCWD’s written concurrence to an extension of a timeframe established in this agreement, NMCWD’s commitment to provide reimbursement will be void after the passage of any deadline for action on the part of CITY’S stated herein. 3. Right of Access CITY will permit NMCWD representatives to enter the Property at reasonable times to inspect the work, ensure compliance with this agreement and monitor or take samples for the purposes of assessing the construction or performance of the Project and compliance with the terms of this agreement. If NMCWD finds that an obligation under this agreement is not being met, it will provide 30 days’ written notice and opportunity to cure, and thereafter may declare this agreement void. CITY will reimburse NMCWD for all costs incurred in the exercise of this authority, including reasonable engineering, legal and other contract costs. CITY will cooperate with NMCWD in allowing members of the public periodically to enter the Property to view the Project in the company of a NMCWD representative. This paragraph does not create any right of public entry onto the Property except as specifically provided for and agreed to herein. 4. Maintenance CITY will maintain the Project for a minimum of ten years from the date construction is complete in accordance with the Maintenance Plan attached as Exhibit B. If CITY fails to maintain the Project, the NMCWD will have a right of reimbursement of all amounts paid to CITY, unless: (a) The NMCWD determines that the failure to maintain the Project was caused by reasons beyond CITY’s control; or (b) CITY has conveyed the underlying property, provided CITY notifies the NMCWD at least 30 days before the property is conveyed and facilitates communication between the NMCWD and the prospective buyer regarding continued maintenance of the Project. 5. Acknowledgment and Publicity Any publicly distributed or displayed printed or electronic documents or other text display regarding the Project will properly acknowledge the funding provided by the NMCWD. The CITY will cooperate with the NMCWD to seek publicity and media coverage of the Project. CITY will permit the NMCWD, at its cost and discretion, to place reasonable signage on CITY’s property informing the general public about the Project and the NMCWD’s Cost Share Program. NMCWD 2018 Cost Share Agreement 3 6. No Relation Between NMCWD and CITY The NMCWD's role under this Agreement is solely to provide funds to support the performance of voluntary work by CITY that furthers the purposes of the NMCWD. CITY acts independently and selects the means, method and manner of constructing the Project. CITY is not the agent, representative, employee or contractor of the NMCWD. 7. Effective Date; Termination; Survival of Obligations This Agreement is effective when fully executed by all parties and expires three years thereafter. The NMCWD retains the right to void this Agreement if construction of the Project is not completed by November 30, 2019. The NMCWD may grant a request to extend the construction-completion period based on CITY’s satisfactory explanation and documentation of the need for an extension. Upon issuance by NMCWD of notice of NMCWD’s determination to void this Agreement, CITY will not receive any further reimbursement for work subject to this Agreement, unless the NMCWD extends the construction-completion period. All obligations that have come into being before termination, specifically including obligations under paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, and Exhibit B shall survive expiration. 8. Subcontract and Assignment CITY will not assign, subcontract or transfer any obligation, right or interest in this Agreement or the Project without the written consent of the NMCWD. Written consent to any subcontract, assignment or transfer will not relieve CITY of responsibility to perform under this Agreement. 9. Indemnification CITY will indemnify, defend and hold harmless the NMCWD, its officers, board members, employees and agents from any and all actions, costs, damages and liabilities of any nature to the degree that they are the result of the CITY’s, a subcontractor’s or an assignee’s negligence or the result of other action or inaction by the CITY, a subcontractor or an assignee that is the basis for CITY’s, the subcontractor’s or the assignee’s liability in law or equity. 10. Compliance With Laws CITY is responsible to secure all permits and comply with all other legal requirements applicable to the construction and maintenance of the Project. 11. Notices Any written communication required under this Agreement shall be addressed to the other party as follows: NMCWD 2018 Cost Share Agreement 4 To NMCWD: Administrator Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 12800 Gerard Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 CITY: Jessica Wilson, or her successor City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 12. Waiver The NMCWD's failure to insist on the performance of any obligation under this Agreement does not waive its right in the future to insist on strict performance of that or any other obligation. Notwithstanding any other term of this Agreement, the NMCWD waives no immunities in tort. This Agreement creates no rights in and waives no immunities with respect to any third party. Intending to be bound, the parties hereto execute and deliver this Agreement. CITY OF EDINA By: ___________________________________ Date: Its Mayor By _____________________________ Date: Its City Manager NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By_______________________________ Date: Randy Anhorn – District Administrator NMCWD 4-13 City Cost Share Agreement 5 Exhibit A [SITE PLAN/WORK PLAN/BUDGET] -2018 Cost Share Application Submitted to NMCWD Nine Mile Creek Discovery Point 12800 Gerard Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55346 (952) 835-2078 www.ninemilecreek.org COST SHARE APPLICATION Landowner Information Name of Landowner(s): City of Edina Address: 7450 Metro Blvd (Edina Public Works Building) City, State, Zip: Edina, MN, 55439 Primary Phone: 952-826-0445 Secondary Phone: Email: jwilson@edinamn.gov Primary Contact Person (if different than above): Jessica Wilson Phone: 952-826-0445 Email: jwilson@edinamn.gov Type of Applicant (check applicable box): Residential 501(c)(3) nonprofit Business or corporation Association School Public agency or local government unit Proposal Information Project Type (e.g. raingarden, shoreline restoration): plow blade equipment upgrade for chloride reduction Give a 2-3 sentence summary of request: The City has partnered with the University of Minnesota on a research project funded by the Local Road Research Board to study ‘Adaptive Management to Improve De-icing Operations’. During a workshop, operators suggested implementing segmented blade technology that might more effectively mechanically remove snow and ice, thereby potentially allowing for less chloride application. This project would involve trying segmented blades on plow routes that vary in traffic volume and pavement type and determining if less chloride is necessary as a result. Project Dates: November 2018 – spring of 2019 Dollar amount requested: $33,000 Total project budget: $44,000 Property Identification Number: Authorization Name of landowner or responsible party: Jessica Wilson Signature: Date: 11/9/2018 1. Landowner Narrative a. Describe your property, history of the site and the past management of the land. The City of Edina Public Works staff maintains approximately 230 miles of roads for the traveling public. During the winter season this means plowing and applying deicers. For many years, the City of Edina has implemented best practices to reduce chloride use including Smart Salting training for operators (level 1) and the organization (level 2), salt brining and prewetting, GPS tracking of trucks and application rate tracking, public education, supporting limited liability legislation for private applicators, and development of a model contract for service providers and property managers – more to come on this. b. List other key participants or partners and their roles. The University of Minnesota research team that we’re currently working has an interest in this project. Although a full study is beyond the scope of the current project, they’re interested in the potential for the equipment to help lessen chloride use. Their role at this point is to stay informed and consider future research proposals that might help better quantify the benefits. 2. Project Narrative a. Describe the issue to be addressed. Chloride is accumulating in our local water resources and the leading strategy to protect the environment is to control the pollutant at the source. New technology, equipment, best practices, and training enable operators to use less material. b. Describe the project objectives and expected outcomes, including how the project supports one or more of the Cost Share Program purposes. The project includes replacing conventional blades with segmented floating blades that are more able to articulate with variability in the road surface, providing for more contact with the road surface. The hypothesis is that more contact with the road surface would mean more effective mechanical clearing of snow and ice. Operators may be able to use less chloride to break up snow and ice if it can be more effectively removed by mechanical means. http://winterequipment.com/joma The project aligns with the Cost Share Program purpose of protecting surface and ground water resources. 3. Project Details a. Attach a Project Plan (see Cost Share Guidelines for details). A plow route map is attached. Routes to be outfitted with the equipment include 3B, 3E, 4B, 4C, and 4D. b. Attach an aerial photo showing project location (see Cost Share Guidelines for details). Not applicable. See plow route map from 3a. c. Attach a project budget Attached. d. Project Timeline Equipment would be purchased upon a funding decision from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board. The provider has indicated availability approximately 4-6 weeks. The fleet manager and mechanics are prepared to install equipment as soon as it arrives. Plowing would occur over the 2018-2019 season and into future seasons. e. Plant list, if applicable. Not applicable. 4. Project Evaluation a. How will the project be maintained? The City of Edina has a team of mechanics and operators whose primary tasks include maintaining and operating this kind of equipment. b. Describe how the project will be monitored and evaluated for success. The blades will be tried out on routes that vary in traffic volume, pavement type, and neighborhood type. Operators will be asked to review the blades and their effectiveness in mechanical removal and if the blades allowed them to use less chloride. Due to variability in the routes, operators, and storm events, it’s difficult to empirically measure the impact. We intend to outfit the truck in the plow route that is part of the U of M study with the new blades to see if there is a marked decrease in chloride use. If the reduction is small, it may be difficult to determine the effect that the plow blade had; however, if the reduction is relatively large, it may show up in the data. Additionally, we track salt application per event. Our ability to analyze this dataset in-house is limited; however, the data would be recorded and freely shared. Our plow operators have a lot of experience and expertise. Anecdotal information about effectiveness will provide valuable insight. c. How will the results be shared and with whom? The University of Minnesota team reported their findings to-date at the 2018 Minnesota Water Resources Conference and described the operators desire to try the segmented blade technology as an outcome of their workshop. As the U of M team continues their research, they will describe the adaptive management journey of the operators which includes trying these blades. The U of M will report their findings to the Local Road Research Board upon completing their study in 2019. The City regularly communicates about winter maintenance and chloride use through its communication channels including the Public Works Pipeline. This trial and its outcomes would be shared through that medium. The streets department can consult with other entities that use the blades to learn about their operations and also act as a resource for others that would consider trying them. Other government agencies that use similar blades include City of Rochester, MN DOT, City of Council Bluffs, City of Eden Prairie, City of Bloomington, and St Louis County Public Works. d. What additional project(s) could be initiated because of this project? In October, City staff met with the University of Minnesota research team to determine if some experiments to quanitfy the effectiveness of the segmented blades for chloride reduction could be done under the current ‘Adaptive Management to Improve Deicing Operations’ project. Although the additional experiments were beyond the scope of their current project, they thought it might be a part of a future Local Road Research Board grant application and that an initial trial may support the application. 5. How did you hear about the Cost Share Program? The City of Edina is a past participant in the cost share program and has partnered on multiple successful projects and initiatives with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Cost Share Budget Worksheet Service Provider Task # Hours Rate/H our Grant Funds Matching Funds Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Subtotal:-$ -$ -$ Unit Costs Total #Grant Funds Matching Funds Total 4800 5 18,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 24,000.00$ 4000 5 15,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 20,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Subtotal:33,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 44,000.00$ Total:33,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 44,000.00$ % Match:25 Grants require a minimum 25% match; buckthorn/invasive species removal projects require 50% match. Contact the District for more information. For questions, contact the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District office at 952-358-2276. LABOR COSTS (Contractors, Consultants, In-Kind Labor) Project Materials plow blades - assembly kit replacement blades set NMCWD 4-13 City Cost Share Agreement 6 NMCWD 4-13 City Cost Share Agreement 7 Exhibit B Maintenance Plan 1. Salt-related Retrofits. Equipment described in the Site Plan and Work Plan attached as Exhibit A to the Agreement must be maintained as follows: a. Equipment will be properly stored and maintained. b. Equipment will be inspected annually and any problems will be fixed within 30 days of inspection if possible. c. Equipment will be calibrated so that application rates in accordance with the Minnesota Road Salt Manual or the Winter Parking Lot and Sidewalk Manual guidelines. 2. Monitoring. Grantee will monitor chloride applications and usage for effectiveness of application rates and reductions due to project. 3. Reporting. Grantee will submit to the NMCWD annually a written report that describes the maintenance activities performed under the Agreement to which this Exhibit is attached, including dates, locations of inspection, maintenance activities performed and photographs of the Project. 4. Termination. The CITY’s obligations hereunder will be terminated on November 30, 2028. CITY OF EDINA By: ___________________________________ Date: Its Mayor By __________________________________ Date: Its City Manager Accepted by NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT By: ___________________________________ Date: Randy Anhorn, District Administrator Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.F. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy Amendment Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve amended Pedestrian Crossing Policy. INTRODUCTION: At its June 5, 2018 meeting, the City Council approved a new pedestrian crossing policy. Given that the newly- approved policy only addressed uncontrolled crossings, staff worked with its consultant to draft an amendment to the policy to include pedestrian crossings at controlled intersections. Attached is the amended policy. Note that the flowchart and table (pages three and four) have not changed. Pages one and two are new and serve to explain the overall policy. The section titled “Controlled Crossings,” is the focus of the amendment. The Transportation Commission recommended approval of the amended policy at its November 15, 2018 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Amended Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy PURPOSE Pedestrian crossings are an integral part of our transportation infrastructure. The Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy provides guidance to ensure the consistent application and treatment of pedestrian crossings throughout the city. To be effective and promote safety, marked crosswalks must be installed after careful consideration and review. The review shall be done with adherence to accepted guidelines and good engineering practice. This policy establishes the guidelines and considerations for the installation of marked crosswalks from the date of the adoption of this policy. POLICY The City of Edina may consider the installation of marked crosswalks where there is substantial conflict between vehicular and pedestrian movements as an enhancement for pedestrian crossings of roadways under the City’s jurisdiction. Crosswalk installation shall be in accordance with State Law and the guidelines contained herein. AUTHORITY This policy is based on administrative implementation of policy and Minnesota State Statute 169. The policy is administered under the direction of the Director of Public Works and applies to roadways under the City’s jurisdiction. DEFINITIONS Crosswalks: Minnesota State Statute defines that crosswalks exist at intersections, whether marked or unmarked, and provides for pedestrian and motorist responsibilities. It also identifies the existence of crosswalks at non-intersection portions of the roadway when distinctly indicated with surface markings. MN Statute 169.011 DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 20. Crosswalk. “Crosswalk” means (1) that portion of a roadway ordinarily included with the prolongation or connection of the lateral lines of sidewalks at intersections; (2) any portion of a roadway distinctly indicated for pedestrian crossing by lines or other markings on the surface. MN Statute 169.21 PEDESTRIAN. Subdivision 2. Rights in absence of signal. (a) Where traffic-control signals are not in place or in operation, the driver of a vehicle shall stop to yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing the roadway within a marked crosswalk or at an intersection with no marked crosswalk. The driver must remain stopped until the pedestrian has passed the lane in which the vehicle is stopped. No pedestrian shall suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path of a vehicle which is so close that it is impossible for the driver to yield. This provision shall not apply under the conditions as otherwise provided in this subdivision. Uncontrolled Crossings: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) defines an uncontrolled crossing as “a pedestrian crossing location where sidewalks or designated walkways intersect a roadway at a location where no traffic control (i.e. traffic signal or STOP sign) is present. These common crossing types occur at intersections (where they may be marked or unmarked) and at non- intersection or midblock locations (where they must be marked as crossings).” Controlled Crossings: A controlled crossing is a pedestrian crossing at a location where traffic control (i.e. traffic signal or STOP sign) is present. WHEN TO INSTALL A CROSSWALK AND APPROPRIATE TREATMENTS Factors such as the presence of a regional trail or school crossing, the number of pedestrians crossing per hour (pph), roadway geometry, and the volume and speed of motorists impact not only the opportunity for crossing, but also motorist and pedestrian compliance and the safety of certain crossing treatments. The following guidelines are intended for use as a decision making tool to identify where it is appropriate to install a marked crossing based on site-specific criteria that effect the safety and necessity of a marked crossing. UNCONTROLLED CROSSINGS The Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Location Treatment Flowchart represents up-to-date local and national safety best practices and federal and state guidance. This policy is based upon the review and compilation of crossing research and policies including, but not limited to, the FHWA Guide for Improving Pedestrian Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations and the City of Boulder Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines. If a marked crossing at an uncontrolled location is determined to be appropriate based on the Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Location Treatment Flowchart in Figure 1, the Decision Guide for Crossing Treatments in Table 1 will be applied to determine the need for additional treatments such as in-roadway signs and Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs). CONTROLLED CROSSINGS Marked crosswalks should be installed at signalized intersections in accordance with the traffic signal design. It is recommended to install marked crosswalks at intersection approaches controlled by STOP signs if any of the following apply to the crossing: • School Crossing or Located in a School Zone – A school crossing is defined as a crossing location where ten or more student pedestrians per hour are crossing. A school zone is defined as a segment of street or highway that abuts school grounds where children have access to the roadway or where a school crossing is in place. • Multi-use Trail Crossing – The City of Edina has several multi-use trails including the regional trail system and the inner and outer loop trail systems. • Meets pedestrian and vehicle volume thresholds – Pedestrian volumes of 60 or more pedestrians per hour during the peak hour are expected and vehicular daily volumes of 3,000 or more are expected to cross over the crosswalk. Young, elderly, and disabled pedestrians count 2x towards volume thresholds. If a marked crossing at a location controlled by a STOP sign is determined to be appropriate based on the above guidelines, a standard crosswalk marking should be installed at the crossing. If one approach to an all-way stop controlled intersection meets the criteria for a marked crosswalk, consider marking all approaches unless crossing is otherwise prohibited on an approach. This policy is based upon the review and compilation of crossing research and policies including, but not limited to, the SFMTA Crosswalk Guidelines, San Francisco, CA; the City of Boulder Pedestrian Crossing Treatment Installation Guidelines; the Hennepin County DRAFT Crossing Guidance; the Portland Crosswalk Site Evaluation Guidelines. No Action Recommended Direct Pedestrians to nearest marked or protected crossing Consider installing “unmarked pedestrian crossing facilitations”(5), subject to staff review/ engineering judgment Direct pedestrians to nearest marked or protected crossing or consider HAWK beacon, traffic signal or grade separated crossing Go to Table 1 ADT ≥1,000 vpd (1) School Crossing* or School Zone**? Multi-Use Path Crossing? Adequate stopping sight distance? (8x speed limit) Meets min. pedestrian volume thresholds? (2) Nearest marked or protected crossing ≥ 300’ away? (4) Remove sight distance obstructions or lower speed limit Crossing serves transit stop or other noticeable, defined and regular crossing? (3) N N N N N N N Y Y Y Feasible Not Feasible Y Y (1) Exception to the 1,000 vpd min. roadway volume threshold may be made for School Crossings* where the peak hour traffic exceeds 10% of the daily traffic (2) Minimum Pedestrian Volume Thresholds: • 20 peds per hour*** in any one hour, or • 18 peds per hour*** in any two hours, or • 15 peds per hour*** in any three hours * School Crossing defined as a crossing location where ten or more student pedestrians per hour are crossing ** School Zone defined as A segment of street or highway that abuts school grounds where children have access to the roadway or where a school crossing is in place *** Young, elderly, and disabled pedestrians count 2x towards volume thresholds (3) Refer to note 2 for guidance on reasonable volume thresholds (4) Distance to the nearest marked or protected crossing may be reduced to 200’ in urban conditions, subject to engineering judgment, where crossing treatments and crossing activity would not create undue restrictions to vehicular traffic operations. (5) An “unmarked pedestrian crossing facility” is any treatment that improves a pedestrian’s ability to cross a roadway, short of the marked, signed and enhanced crossings detailed in Table 1. Installation of this type of pedestrian facilitation is subject to engineering judgment and may include curb ramps and/or a raised median refuge. However, no effort is made to attract pedestrians or recommend that pedestrians cross at this location. The treatments simply provide an improvement for a low volume pedestrian crossing where pedestrians are already crossing and will like continue to cross. City of Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy Figure 1. Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Location Treatment Flowchart Y Start Here Roadway Configuration # of lanes crossed to reach a refuge(1) # of multiple threat lanes(2) per crossing Roadway ADT and Posted Speed 1,000-9,000 vpd (3) 9,000-12,000 vpd 12,000-15,000 vpd > 15,000 vpd ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph ≤ 30 mph 35 mph 40 mph 2 Lanes (one way street)2 1 A B C A B C B B C B C C 2 Lanes (two way street with no median)2 0 A B C A B C B B C B C C 3 Lanes (w/raised median)1 or 2 0 or 1 A B D A C D B D D C D D 3 Lanes (w/striped median)3 0 or 1 C C D C C D C C E C D E 4 Lanes (two way street with no median)4 2 A D D B D D B D E D D E 5 Lanes (w/raised median)2 or 3 2 A B D B C D B C E C C E 5 Lanes w/striped median 5 2 D D D D D D D D E D D E 6 Lanes (two way street with or without median)3 to 6 4 E E E E E E E E E E E E Notes: 1. Painted medians can never be considered a refuge for a crossing pedestrian. Similarly, a 4 foot wide raised median next to a left turn lane can only be considered a refuge for pedestrians if the left turning volume is less than 20 vehicles per hour (meaning that in most cases the left turn lane is not occupied while the pedestrian is crossing). 2. A multiple threat lane is defined as a through lane where it is possible for a pedestrian to step out from in front of a stopped vehicle in the adjacent travel lane (either through or turn lane). 3. Additional treatments may be considered if suitable gaps in traffic for safe crossing are not available. Treatment Descriptions A Install marked crosswalk with road-side signs Specific Guidance: Install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) with standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. B Install marked crosswalk with road-side and in-roadway (bollard mounted) signs Specific Guidance: Install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) and “State Law – Stop for Pedestrian” (R1-6) signs mounted on in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. C Install marked crosswalk with signs and geometric improvements to increase pedestrian visibility and reduce exposure Specific Guidance: For 2-lane roadways, install marked crosswalk with signs mounted on the side of the roadway (W11-2 and W16-7P) and “State Law – Stop for Pedestrian” (R1-6) signs mounted on in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. Add curb extensions (concrete, paint, flexible delineators) or median refuge islands to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists. For 3+ lane roadways, install marked crosswalk with advance regulatory “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) signs mounted on the side of the roadway, (W11-2 and W16-7P) mounted at the crossing location on the side of the roadway and “State Law – Stop for Pedestrian” (R1-6) signs mounted on in-roadway bollards; use standard (W11-2) advance pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. Add curb extensions or median refuge islands to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists. Advance stop bars may be used in combination with “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) sign. D Install marked crosswalk with advanced “Stop here for Pedestrians” signs, pedestrian activated Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs), and geometric improvements to increase pedestrian visibility and reduce exposure Specific Guidance: Install raised median refuge island (unless it is a one-way street or one already exists) to shorten the pedestrian crossing distance and increase pedestrian visibility to motorists. [If a median refuge cannot be constructed on a two-way street, go to Treatment E]. Install marked crosswalk with signs (W11-2 and W16-7P) WITH pedestrian activated RRFBs mounted on the side of the roadway and on median mounted signs AND advance regulatory “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) signs mounted on the side of the roadway; use standard (W11-2) advance warning pedestrian warning signs; use S1-1 signs for School Crossing locations. Consider adding curb extensions at the crossing if on-street parking exists on the roadway and storm drain considerations will allow. Advance stop bars may be used in combination with “Stop here for Pedestrians” (R1-5) sign. E Do not install marked crosswalk at uncontrolled crossing. Consider HAWK beacon, pedestrian traffic signal, or grade-separated crossing Specific Guidance: Consider HAWK beacon, pedestrian traffic signal or grade-separated crossing; application of these treatments will consider, corridor signal progression, existing grades, physical constraints, and other engineering factors. City of Edina Pedestrian Crossing Policy Table 1. Decision Guide for Crossing Treatments Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.G. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, PE, Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Special Assessment Policy Revision Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve text revision to the assessment policy. INTRODUCTION: As part of the Special Assessment Policy Revisions discussed in 2016, two sentences of the previous policy were inadvertently omitted. This revision adds a description of assessable costs in the assessable costs paragraph. The italic and bold text of sentences 2 and 3 are being inserted back into the policy as noted in earlier versions of the policy. And in the first paragraph a clarifiying note "and MSA" was added. ATTACHMENTS: Description Special Assessment Policy dated Dec. 4, 2018 CITY OF EDINA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY December 4, 2018 POLICY PURPOSE: Establish a special assessment policy for public improvements for local and MSA roadways, alleys, sound walls, water service utility lines, sanitary sewer service utility lines, street lights, sump pump removal or redirection, garbage and debris removal, aquatic weeds, weed mowing, tree removals, and maintenance districts. DEFINITIONS: 1. Municipal State Aid Roadway (MSA): MSA refers to roadways that are enrolled in the MSA system and is eligible for State Aid funding. 2. Local Roadway: All other roadways without an MSA designation. POLICY: Assessable Costs: Assessable costs shall be assessed to the benefitting properties of the public improvement, based on a Residential Equivalent Unit formula or an alternate methodology described below. Assessable costs include all project costs not allocated to other funding sources. Assessable costs include the following: mobilization, direct construction costs, construction finance costs, City and contracted engineering costs, scientific and technical consulting costs, printing and mailing, legal and other project related costs. Construction finance costs are the cost of funds used to finance the project construction until the adoption of the resolution imposing the special assessment. Costs are assessed as follows: • 20% of the costs for MSA roadways. • 100% of the costs for local roadways. • 100% of the costs specific to a single benefitting property, elected to be assessed by the property owner for the following: Sanitary Sewer Service Utility Line Water Service Utility Line Sump Pump Removal or Redirection Tree Removal • 100% of the costs for alleys. • 100% of the costs for streetlights. • 100% of the costs for sound walls unless partially financed by another agency. • 100% of the costs for designated Maintenance Districts. • 100% of the costs for garbage and debris removal, aquatic weeds, and weed mowing. Residential Equivalent Unit (REU): REU is an equivalency factor used to determine assessment amounts for MSA, local roadway and alley improvements. REU is based on traffic generation of one residential lot, regardless of lot size or amount of street frontage. REU’s shall be calculated according to the following table: Scenario Land Use Class REU Factor Notes A Single Family Residential – Single Family Detached 1.0 1 B Multi-Family Residential – Single Family Attached 0.8 1 C Multi-Family Residential – Multi-Family 0.5 1,4 D Industrial and Utility 0.5 2,3 E Commercial – Office and Retail 1.5 2,4 F Institutional – City Owned Buildings 0.9 2,5 G Institutional – City Owned Open Space See Note 2,6 H Institutional – Schools – Public and Private 0.2 2 I Institutional – Places of Worship 0.2 2 J Mixed Use See Note 4 Notes: 1. Per Unit 2. Per 1000 SF Gross Floor Area from the Assessing Department 3. All uses allowed in Planned Industrial Development (PID) except offices and retail. 4. Mixed Use Properties – A combination calculation by Land Use Class (generally mixes of C and E from data held in the Assessing Department). 5. Facilities associated with the production or distribution of water, sanitary, or storm water shall not be assessed. These include, but are not limited to: parcels with well houses, lift stations, water towers, water treatment facilities. 6. REU calculations shall be based on the placement of like-sized lot lines of nearby properties on developable space. These are for only the first layer of potential properties directly adjacent to the open space. Areas of wetlands, floodway, or other non-developable space will not be considered in the calculation. REU for Corner Lots: If a corner lot is subject to multiple roadway assessments on adjacent streets, the total assessable cost shall be equal to one (1) REU after all streets are improved. A partial REU shall be determined by dividing the number of improved streets by the number of adjacent streets. In a typical corner lot on the boundary of an improvement project, this will result in a 0.5 REU per street assessed in two separate projects, totaling 1 REU. Corner lots subject to a previous street reconstruction assessment under the previous corner lot methodology that paid a 2/3 REU will be assessed 1/3 REU. Other Costs: Other costs are improvement costs paid for by other funding sources such as the Utility Fund, Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund (PACS), MSA, or other funding sources described in an agreement. Other costs include the following public improvements: • 80% of the costs for MSA roadway • The costs of curbs, gutters and other storm water management improvements are paid from the Utility Fund. • The costs of the publicly-owned portions of underground water, sanitary sewer, or storm sewer utility lines are paid from the Utility Fund. • The costs of sidewalks, trails, and pedestrian/cyclist related safety improvements are paid from PACS. Payment and Interest: Assessment methodology, repayment, and interest are described in the table below, and are subject to the following provisions: Project Type Assessment Methodology Payment Period Interest Rate MSA or Local Roadway REU 15 years Net Interest +1% Sanitary Sewer Service Utility Line Direct Costs 15 years Net Interest +1% or 6.5%* Water Service Utility Line Direct Costs 15 years Net Interest +1% or 6.5%* Street Lighting REU 5 years Net Interest +1% Alleys REU 5 years Net Interest +1% Sound Wall Benefit Determination 15 years Net Interest +1% Sump Pump Removal and Redirection Direct Costs 5 years 6.5% Maintenance District Direct Costs 1 Year 6.5% Garbage and Debris Removal Direct Costs 1 Year 6.5% Tree Removal under $500 Direct Costs 1 Year 6.5% Tree Removal $500-$1000 Direct Costs 2 Year 6.5% Tree Removal over $1000 Direct Costs 3 Year 6.5% *6.5% if not done with roadway improvements. 1. Assessment Interest Rate – The interest rate for a special assessment shall be paid based on the “net interest” rate of the bonds to be issued for the project, plus an interest rate premium described in the table above. If a bond is not issued for a project then the net-interest rate shall be the net interest rate of the most recent bonds sold by the City prior to ordering the public improvement. 2. Senior Deferral Program: The City makes available an option for residents over age 65 or who have a permanent disability and meet eligibility standards to defer special assessment. The Senior Deferral Program is described in Resolution 2005-78 (Appendix 1). 3. Prepayment: The City will accept both partial pre-payments and full pre-payments on assessments before certifying the assessment to Hennepin County. A minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be paid as a partial prepayment. 4. Payment Periods: Payment period vary depending on the purpose for which the assessment was levied. Payment periods and terms shall be amortized using a level annual payment schedule. Background: A. Special Assessment Policy dated June 7, 2016 B. Special Assessment Policy dated August 6, 2012 C. Special Assessment Policy Background dated September 7, 2010 D. Special Assessment Policy Proposal dated August 16, 2005 E. Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy dated December 5, 2006 F. Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy dated December 21, 2010 Appendix: 1. Senior Deferral Program Resolution 2005-78 G:\ENG\ADMIN\ASSESSMENTS\POLICY\2018 Review of Policy\20181204 Policy.docx Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.H. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:2018 Market Value Benefit from Street Reconstruction Appraisal Consultation Report Action, Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Receive report. INTRODUCTION: Attached is the final appraisal report performed by the Day Group to measure the benefit of street reconstruction in three sample neighborhoods of Edina. ATTACHMENTS: Description Appraisal Report 2018 Market Value Benefit From Street Reconstruction Appraisal Consultation Report Study of Edina, Including Application to 3 Sample Neighborhoods: Morningside, Melody Lake and Rolling Green Edina, Minnesota Client is City of Edina Day Group Job No. 2018131 GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY September 13, 2018 Chad Millner, Director of Engineering City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 RE: Appraisal Consultation Report Market Value Benefit From Street Reconstruction Study of Edina, Including Application to 3 Sample Neighborhoods: Morningside, Melody Lake, and Rolling Green Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Millner: In accordance with your request, an inspection and appraisal consulting work on the referenced sample/subject neigh- borhoods have been completed. We have considered the relevant factors relating to the sample neighborhoods and the current market forces. The attached report contains the pertinent data, summary of the analysis completed, com- mentary, value conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to this real estate. The client and intended users are City of Edina staff and Council Members; there are no other intended users. Due to the aging and deteriorated condition of public streets within many neighborhoods within Edina, the City has been active in street reconstructions within the community. During 2005, we completed a detailed consultation assignment for the City of Edina pertaining to street reconstruction assessment policy. We understand that costs have increased in recent years, and that the City is seeking to update its special assessment policy pertaining to street reconstruction. Significant time has transpired since 2005, and the City has adopted a policy to fully assess for streets and not for utilities, sidewalks, nor curb & gutters. The intended use of the appraisal consultation is to provide supported opinions of the market value benefit that properties within the sample neighborhoods will experience in conjunction with street reconstruction improvements. The appraisal as developed and reported is only for the stated intended use and users. Day Group LLC assumes no responsibility for any unintended uses or users of the appraisal. The date of the value opinions is August 31, 2018. This appraisal has been made in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), applicable local, state and federal regulations pertaining to appraisal practice and procedure, and the Code of Profes- sional Ethics and the Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. Attached is an ”Appraisal Report” as defined by USPAP, with additional supporting data retained in our workfile. We have completed a credible appraisal analysis consistent with the intended use of the appraisal, the requirements of the intended user, and within conformity of the Scope of Work Rule per USPAP. Please refer to the body of the attached report for descriptions of assignment conditions and the details of the scope of work employed in our development of the conclusions. The appraisal is subject to the general limiting conditions, extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions contained on pages 15 and 16 (please review these before any of the values or conclusions are relied upon). GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Fernbrook Business Center 14232 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, MN 55447 763.205.6966 Fax 763.208.3928 www.daygroupmn.com The consultation valuation conclusions apply to typical residences within the sample neighborhoods, and does not iden- tify a specific property. Applying the results to unique properties (e.g., low-valued or obsolete residences, properties with unusually large or small sites, etc.) may not be appropriate, and should be made with care. Neither our employment to make this appraisal nor the compensation received is contingent upon the conclusions or values reported herein. We have employed several valuation tools, including a resales and paired sales analysis on numerous properties, along with interviews with experienced Edina Realtors. Based upon our research and analysis, we concluded the following market value benefits for the three sample subject neighborhoods: Morningside with 0.15 to 0.30-Acre Lots: $10,000 to $15,000 (1.4% to 2.1% on a $700,000 residence) Melody Lake with 0.25 to 0.40-Acre Lots: $15,000 to $20,000 (3.0% to 4.0% on a $500,000 residence) Rolling Green with 1+ Acre Lots: $25,000 to $30,000 (1.0% to 1.2% on a $2,500,000 residence) Note that these are average values where there may be some exceptions, such as small/modest homes on poor-feature lots may be less, and larger-than-average sites with strong values commanding site premiums would be greater. These conclusions are above the 2005 conclusions, yet are supported by increased costs and recent market analysis. With new street improvements the market appears to fully bear the cost when the original improvements are in poor condition. When the pavement has some remaining life where significant annual patching is not needed, a proration of the new pavement cost would be appropriate. All of the subject neighborhoods’ streets appear to be near the end of their useful life. It has been a pleasure to serve you in this manner. Feel free to contact us if you have any questions or concerns. Respectfully submitted, DAY GROUP LLC Thomas J. Day, MAI, SRA, Partner Minnesota Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 4000814 Jonathan D. Day, MAI, Partner Minnesota Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 20480945 City of Edina September 13, 2018 Page 2 Tab 1 Tab 2 Tab 3 Tab 4 Tab 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ADDENDA IDENTIFICATION OF CLIENT, OTHER INTENDED USERS, AND INTENDED USE OF APPRAISAL CONSULTATION 1 SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 CERTIFICATION OF APPRAISERS 14 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 15 HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS AND EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS 16 TYPE AND DEFINITION OF APPRAISED VALUE 17 DATE OF APPRAISAL CONSULTATION AND PROPERTY RIGHTS 17 SIGNIFICANT ASSIGNMENT CONDITIONS 18 TYPE OF REPORT 19 SCOPE OF WORK USED TO DEVELOP APPRAISAL CONSULTATION 20 OVERVIEW OF THE 2005 STUDY 21 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION 23 SUBJECT NEIGHBORHOODS LOCATION MAP 29 MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION 31 MELODY LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION 37 ROLLING GREEN NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION 43 OVERVIEW OF NEW STREETS AND ANALYSIS 49 RESALES ANALYSIS 55 PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS 85 RESULTS OF REALTOR SURVEY 117 SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS 119 QUALIFICATIONS OF THOMAS J. DAY 129 QUALIFICATIONS OF JONATHAN D. DAY 133 COMPANY BROCHURE 137 MAKE SURE TABS ARE PLACED ON ODD PAGES!!! 1GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN IDENTIFICATION OF CLIENT, OTHER INTENDED USERS, AND INTENDED USE OF APPRAISAL CONSULTATION Intended Users City of Edina staff and Council Members. There are no other intended users. Appraisers Fernbrook Business Center 14232 23rd Ave N Plymouth, MN 55447Phone 763-205-6966 www.daygroupmn.com Thomas J. Day, MAI, SRA, PartnerMN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License #4000814 Email: tom@daygroupmn.com Jonathan D. Day, MAI, PartnerMN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License #20480945 Email: jon@daygroupmn.com Some professional assistance from Barbara L. Day, PartnerMN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License #20318572 Assisted with preliminary comparable research, analysis and report writing GROUP LLCREAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Client and Appraisal Consultation Engagement City of Edina7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Chad Millner, Director of Engineering, engaged the appraisers Previous Subject Appraisals The appraisers have completed a prior appraisal in 2005 for a similar purpose Restriction on Use of Appraisal Consultation Differing intended users and appraisal problems/assignments involve different assignment conditions, scope of work, and reporting require-ments. Hence, this appraisal as developed and reported is only for the intended users and stated use. Neither the appraisers nor Day Group LLC assume responsibility for any reliance by unintended users or uses of the appraisal. The appraisers have not identified any property owner, purchaser, bor- rower or seller as an intended user of the appraisal consultation, and no such party should use or rely on the appraisal for any purpose. Such parties are advised to obtain an appraisal from an appraiser of their own choosing if they require an appraisal for their own use. The appraisal report should not serve as the basis for any property pur- chase decision or any appraisal contingency in a purchase agreement relating to any Edina property. Any unauthorized use or third party relying upon any portion of this report, does so at its own risk and liability. Intended Use of Appraisal During 2005, we had completed a detailed consultation assignment for the City of Edina pertaining to street reconstruction assessment policy. We understand that costs have increased in recent years, and that the City is seeking to update its special assessment policy pertaining to street reconstruction. The intended use of the appraisal consultation is to provide supported opinions of the market value benefit that properties within the sample neighborhoods will experience in conjunction with street reconstruc-tion improvements. Use or reliance of the appraisal is only for the stated use. 2 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Subject Property Name and Location Three sample neighborhoods studied:Morningside Melody LakeRolling Green All located in Edina, MN The consultation valuation conclusions apply to typical residences within the sample neighborhoods, and does not identify a specific property. Day Group File Number 2018131 Property Types Detached residential properties within established neighborhoods having good location appeal, mostly quality housing, and strong mar- ket values Melody Lake Rolling Green Morningside 3GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Overview of Valuation Analysis Our study has included the following work: 1. Resales analysis - study of neighborhoods where new streets have recently occurred. This includes identifying and study- ing properties which sold twice, both before and after the street reconstruction, providing a value benefit indication. 2. Paired sales analysis - study of neighborhoods where new streets have recently occurred. Comparisons of different comparable properties which sold before and after new streets were made to produce value benefit indications. 3. Survey of Realtors who are active in Edina, many of whom have been involved with new street properties. Resales Analysis A total of 26 properties have been used for detailed study. 22 have indicated positive value benefit while 4 indicated no (negative) value benefit. Following are summary tables and charts. Due to market ir- regularities/anomalies, a few resales indicate a negative benefit, and a few indicate exorbitant amounts. The majority, however, indicate a typical benefit of $10,000 to $30,000. The following general conclusions have been made: n Measurable market value benefit is supported n Benefit as a percentage of total value is low, yet the dollar amount is significant n Scattergrams with computer-generated trend lines indicate increasing benefit as lot size increases n Greater benefit is possible for higher-priced properties n While the benefit as a percentage of total value decreases as property values increase, the dollar benefit amount is sig-nificant for high-priced properties. For example, a 2.0% ben- efit on a $1,500,000 property results in a benefit amount of $30,000 4 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Set Address Sale Price - New Street Lot Size Value Benefit Percentage of Total Neighborhood 1 5101 Halifax Ave S $1,402,500 0.20 $17,600 1.25%Arden Park 2 5124 Valley View Rd $456,600 0.37 $24,632 5.39%Birchcrest 3 6134 Arctic Way $674,500 0.48 $31,500 4.67%Bredesen Park 4 6505 Polar Circle $516,350 0.37 $6,350 1.23%Bredesen Park 5 5949 Walnut Dr $411,000 0.27 -$30,000 -7.30%Bredesen Park 6 5512 Hunter St $1,184,019 0.40 $12,019 1.02%Countryside 7 5805 Tracy Ave $283,000 0.40 $26,000 9.19%Countryside 8 6108 Westridge Blvd $1,055,000 0.40 $45,000 4.27%Countryside 9 5821 Arbour Ave $532,880 0.25 -$23,120 -4.34%Countryside 10 5932 Grove St $419,000 0.25 $19,000 4.53%Countryside 11 7429 Hyde Park Ln $826,000 0.25 -$3,000 -0.36%Dewey Hill 12 5620 Wooddale Ave $602,417 0.19 $6,964 1.16%Golf Terrace 13 5016 Richmond Dr $404,337 0.20 $29,087 7.19%Grandview 14 5036 Richmond Dr $353,500 0.20 $22,600 6.39%Grandview 15 300 Grove Pl $363,573 0.36 $15,179 4.17%Interlachen Park 16 309 John St $662,747 0.36 $14,747 2.23%Interlachen Park 17 6433 Sherwood Ave $371,500 0.36 $20,250 5.45%Lake Cornelia 18 4949 Poppy Ln $613,500 0.36 $12,500 2.04%Lake Edina 19 4224 Scott Terrace $472,000 0.17 $51,970 11.01%Morningside 20 4245 Scott Terrace $591,500 0.23 $4,600 0.78%Morningside 21 6224 Chowen Ave $481,100 0.32 $100 0.02%Strachauer Park 22 4081 Sunnyside Rd $1,025,000 0.61 $27,000 2.63%White Oaks 23 5408 Valley Ln $447,460 0.30 -$6,040 -1.35%Normandale Park 24 6411 Limerick Dr $449,920 0.34 $21,170 4.71%Normandale Park 25 5000 Bruce Ave $720,000 0.26 $66,750 9.27%Arden Park 26 5113 Indianola Ave $747,900 0.19 $23,000 3.08%Arden Park Average $617,973 0.31 $16,764 3.01% Median $524,615 0.31 $18,300 2.85%Extremes (neg & >$40k)Average w/o Extremes $610,682 0.33 $17,595 3.53%Median w/o Extremes $516,350 0.36 $19,000 3.08% Summary of Resale Value Benefit Indications 5GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) 6 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Analysis All 21 properties used for detailed paired sales study indicated positive value benefit. Following are summary tables and charts. While there are some market irregularities/anomalies, the majority indicate a typi- cal benefit of $10,000 to $30,000. The following general conclusions have been made: n Measurable market value benefit is supported n Benefit as a percentage of total value is low, yet the dollar amount is significant n Scattergrams with computer-generated trend lines indicate increasing benefit as lot size increases n Greater benefit is possible for higher-priced properties n While the benefit as a percentage of total value decreases as property values increase, the dollar benefit amount is sig-nificant for high-priced properties. For example, a 2.0% ben- efit on a $1,500,000 property results in a benefit amount of $30,000 7GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Set Address Sale Price - New Street Lot Size Value Benefit Percentage of Total Neighborhood 1 5321 Halifax Ave S $1,335,000 0.26 $25,000 1.87%Arden Park 2 5101 Halifax Ave S $1,210,000 0.20 $10,000 0.83%Arden Park 3 5229 Halifax Ave S $1,335,000 0.28 $17,820 1.33%Arden Park 4 5217 61st St W $450,000 0.24 $22,000 4.89%Birchrest 5 5126 Roberts Pl $401,300 0.27 $11,300 2.82%Birchrest 6 6012 Birchrest Dr $377,500 0.23 $27,500 7.28%Birchrest 7 5121 Valley View Rd $490,500 0.25 $20,500 4.18%Birchrest 8 6001 Code Ave $491,352 0.25 $30,352 6.18%Birchrest 9 5221 Maddox Ln $514,700 0.49 $16,700 3.24%Birchrest 10 5325 62nd St W $542,100 0.23 $42,100 7.77%Birchrest 11 5721 Fairfax Ave $668,280 0.23 $28,280 4.23%Golf Terrace Heights 12 4629 56th St W $1,663,822 0.19 $25,222 1.52%Golf Terrace Heights 13 4614 Lakeview Dr $1,847,000 0.37 $25,100 1.36%Golf Terrace Heights 14 4300 Eton Pl $600,866 0.15 $15,866 2.64%Morningside 15 4219 Scott Terrace $390,000 0.23 $10,000 2.56%Morningside 16 3909 Morningside Rd $1,119,000 0.15 $19,000 1.70%Morningside 17 4001 Morningside Rd $1,530,000 0.15 $25,000 1.63%Morningside 18 4004 42nd St W $443,450 0.25 $18,450 4.16%Morningside 19 4214 Scott Terrace $1,106,600 0.46 $21,600 1.95%Morningside 20 4707 Townes Rd $1,349,000 0.48 $49,000 3.63%White Oaks 21 4708 Townes Rd $1,625,000 0.39 $75,000 4.62%White Oaks Average $928,118 0.27 $25,514 3.35% Median $668,280 0.25 $22,000 2.82% Extremes (neg & >$40k)Average w/o Extremes $887,465 0.26 $20,538 3.02% Median w/o Extremes $634,573 0.25 $21,050 2.60% Summary of Resale Value Benefit Indications 8 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) 9GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Combined Analysis A total of 47 properties have been used for detailed study. Forty-three identified sales have indicated positive value benefit while 4 indicated no/negative value benefit. Histogram of Value Benefit Indications 10 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Scattergram of All Resale & Paired Sales 11GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Scattergram of All Resale & Paired Sales 12 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Realtor Comments Telephone and email interviews were conducted with 32 Realtors hav-ing experience in Edina, all having recent sales and/or active listings. Many of the interviews focused on the property they were involved with selling and how the street reconstruction and assessments impacted the property’s value in selling the home. In addition, those Realtors having familiarity with the Rolling Green neighborhood were specifi-cally asked their opinions for the potentially high assessment amounts in that neighborhood. The general consensus conclusions are: n Measurable market value benefit is supported n Realtors were mostly supportive of potential higher value benefit in Rolling Green n Concern was expressed for low-valued property 13GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT IDENTIFICATION AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (CONTINUED) Conclusions Summary Comments, Observations and Conclusions: 1. While it may be difficult to isolate the value contribution from an individual amenity or feature, measurable market value benefit from new streets in Edina is supported from the combined data and from the Realtor interviews. 2. With new street improvements, the market appears to fully bear the cost when the original improvements are in poor condition. When the pavement has some remaining life where significant annual patching is not needed, a proration of the new pavement cost would be appropriate. All of the sample subject neighborhoods’ streets appear to be near the end of their useful life. 3. The combined histogram shows that the vast majority of value benefit indications are above $10,000, with the majority being above $15,000. 4. The combined scattergrams with computer-generated trend lines indicate increasing benefit as lot size increases. 5. Value benefit increases as property values increase - there is good correlation in the data, plus Realtor interviews support this conclu-sion. This is further demonstrated by a comparison of the average resales and paired sales data. The resales have an average benefit of $17,595 and an average price of $610,274. The paired sales have higher figures - $20,538 and $875,399 respectively. 6. New street benefit as a percentage of total property value remains a good measuring tool. 7. While the benefit as a percentage of total value decreases as property values increase, the dollar benefit amount is greater for high-priced properties. 8. Our study consisted of limited data for high-end properties having large lots. Extrapolating conclusions from the scattergrams support higher benefit. Intuitively, if moderate-size sites and values well below $1.0 million can produce new street benefit of $15,000 to $20,000, there is a reasonable expectation that large/upper-valued properties may achieve notably higher benefit. Furthermore, our analysis of the 3 high-end properties within White Oaks produced value benefit indications of $27,000 and above. Nevertheless, the upper bracket benefit is less tested. 9. While our study did not include many low-valued properties, there is value benefit concern with dated condition or low-end properties; Realtor interviews indicated this, plus an increased cost-to-value percentage might not be sustained for such properties. 10. Within Edina, it has become common for buyers to assume special assessments for street projects. 11. Some homeowners can be opposed to special assessments, and may have strong feelings of the negative financial impact on their own property. However, when it comes to selling the property, value benefit matching or exceeding the assessment amounts are being created by the reconstructed road. 12. Edina is somewhat unique. Many other communities assess only a portion of costs, with a large balance being funded from general taxes. Many of these policies are designed to keep contested appeals to a minimum. The new street/old street valuation variation may be reduced in other communities since street replacement will be funded from general taxes and not by the benefitting property owners. For example, in Minnetonka owners of properties within old street neighborhoods will not need to bear the cost of street reconstruction. With Edina’s strong market with upper values, low general taxes and a desire/expectation for good public services and infrastructure, the market acceptance of assessments where benefit can be shown is good. Based upon our research and analysis, and applying the prior conclusions, we conclude the following market value benefits for the 3 sample sub- ject neighborhoods: Morningside with 0.15 to 0.30-Acre Lots: $10,000 to $15,000 (1.4% to 2.1% on a $700,000 residence) Melody Lake with 0.25 to 0.40-Acre Lots: $15,000 to $20,000 (3.0% to 4.0% on a $500,000 residence) Rolling Green with 1+ Acre Lots: $25,000 to $30,000 (1.0% to 1.2% on a $2,500,000 residence) Note that these are average values where there may be some exceptions, such as small/modest homes on poor-feature lots may be less, and larger-than-average sites with strong values commanding site premiums would be greater. These conclusions are above the 2005 conclusions, yet are supported by increased costs and recent market analysis. Please review the “extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions” section of this report on page 16 before relying on the values, recom- mendations, or other conclusions. 14 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN CERTIFICATION OF APPRAISERS 11) The reported analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in con- formity with the requirements of the Code of Profes- sional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 12) The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives. 13) As of the date of this report, I have completed the con- tinuing education program for Designated Members of the Appraisal Institute. 14) I certify that I have adequate knowledge, experience, education and resources to competently complete this appraisal assignment. Date: September 13, 2018 Signature: ____________________________________ Thomas J. Day, MAI, SRA State Certification: Minnesota Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 4000814 Expiration Date: 8/31/2020 Signature: ____________________________________ Jonathan D. Day, MAI, Partner State Certification: Minnesota Certified General Real Property Appraiser License No. 20480945 Expiration Date: 8/31/2020 Each signing appraiser certifies to the following. I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief: 1) The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2) The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are my personal, impartial, and un- biased professional analyses, opinions, and conclu- sions. 3) I have no present or prospective interest in any prop- erty within a subject sample neighborhood, nor any other residence within the community, and no person- al interest with respect to the parties involved. 4) I have performed no services, as an appraiser or in any other capacity, regarding any property within a sample neighborhood that is the subject of this report within the three-year period immediately preceding acceptance of this assignment. 5) I have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of this report or to the parties involved with this assignment. 6) My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined results. 7) My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or reporting of a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value opin- ion, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the oc- currence of a subsequent event directly related to the intended use of this appraisal. 8) My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were devel- oped, and this report has been prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP). 9) I have made a personal inspection of the 3 sample neighborhoods that are the subjects of this report. 10) Appraiser Barbara L. Day (MN Certified General Real Property Appraiser License #20318572) assisted in research, preliminary analysis and report writing. No one else provided significant real property appraisal assistance to the person signing this report. 15GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Includes assumptions and limiting condi-tions provided in the 13th Addn. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS 1) The appraisers assume no responsibility for matters of a legal na-ture affecting the property appraised or the title thereto, nor do the appraisers render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good and marketable. 2) The furnished legal description is assumed to be correct. 3) The property is appraised free and clear of all indebtedness, liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated. 4) Responsible ownership and competent property management are assumed. 5) Any plat, site plan or sketch in the report may show approximate dimensions and is included to assist the reader in visualizing the property. The appraisers have made no survey of the property. It is assumed that the utilization of the subject land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted within the report. 6) The appraisers are not required to give further consultation, testi-mony, or appear in court because of having made the appraisal with reference to the property in question, unless arrangements have been previously made. 7) Any allocation of the total value estimated in this report between the land and the improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization. The separate values allocated to the land and build-ings must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if so used. 8) The appraisers assume that there are no hidden or unapparent con- ditions of the property, subsoil, or structures, which would render it more or less valuable. The appraisers assume no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering which might be required to discover such factors. Stable soils are assumed unless otherwise stated. 9) Unless otherwise noted in this report, the subject is assumed to have no significant or value-impacting delineated wetlands. Since identifying these factors is beyond our area of expertise, we assume no responsibility for any such conditions, or for any expertise or en- gineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 10) Depending upon the scope of work, the appraisers may have re-viewed FEMA maps for determining the subject’s Special Flood Hazard Area. Precise locations are difficult to make, and we can not guarantee such determinations. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 11) Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous material, which may or may not be present on the property, was not observed by the appraisers. The appraisers have no knowl- edge of the existence of such materials on or in the property. The appraisers, however, are not qualified to detect such substances. The presence of substances such as petroleum products, asbes- tos, urea-formaldehyde foam insulation, radon gas, mold, or other potentially hazardous materials may affect the value of the property. The value estimate is predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the property that would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, or for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field, if desired. 12) It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless a nonconformity has been identified, described and considered in the appraisal. 13) It is assumed that all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, and other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the opinion of value contained in this report is based. 14) It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable local, state and federal environmental regulations unless a noncompli-ance has been stated, described, and considered in the appraisal report. 15) Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the appraisers by others, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct. However, no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished the appraisers can be assumed by the appraisers. 16) This appraisal does not affix or set the price of the property but offers only a supportable opinion as to the present worth of antici- pated benefits subject to investment risk, measured mainly by the market data available at the valuation date. Therefore, I assume no liability for changes in market conditions or for the inability of the owner to locate a purchaser at the appraised value within the estimated exposure/marketing time period. 17) Disclosure of the contents of the appraisal report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the Appraisal Institute. No part of the contents of this report, or copy thereof (especially any conclusions as to value, the identity of the appraisers, professional designations, reference to any professional appraisal organizations, or the firm with which the appraisers is connected), shall be disseminated to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the prior written consent and approval of the apprais-ers. 18) The Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) became effective Jan- uary 26, 1992. We have not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of this property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the ADA. It is possible that a compliance survey of the property, together with a detailed analysis of the requirements of the ADA, could reveal that the property is not in compliance with one or more of the require-ments of the Act. If so, this fact could have a negative effect upon the value of the property. Since we have no direct evidence relating to this issue, we did not consider possible non-compliance with the requirements of ADA in estimating the value of the property. 19) Information in the appraisal report relating to the comparable mar-ket data is more fully documented in the confidential files in the office of the appraisers. 20) Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication. 21) Differing intended users and appraisal problems/assignments in-volve different assignment conditions and scope of work. Hence, this appraisal as developed and reported is only for the intended user(s) and stated use. Neither the appraisers nor Day Group LLC assume responsibility for any reliance by unintended users or uses of the appraisal. Any unauthorized use or third party relying upon any portion of this report, does so at its own risk and liability. 16 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN HYPOTHETICAL CONDITIONS AND EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTIONS Extraordinary Assumptions EXTRAORDINARY ASSUMPTION DEFINED (per USPAP): an as-signment-specific assumption as of the effective date regarding uncer- tain information used in an analysis which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser’s opinions or conclusions. Uncertain information might include physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the sub- ject property; or conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or the integrity of data used in an analysis. 1. The concluded value opinions associated with new public improve-ments are based upon the assumption that the existing public streets are dated and have limited remaining life. 2. No consideration has been given to the temporary inconveniences associated with the construction of the streets. It is assumed that there will be proper staging of the construction so as to minimize disruption. 3. Proper driveway connections will be made, and that all disturbed soils will be appropriately graded and fully sodded so as to leave mini- mal work for property owners. 4. All public improvements will be within the right-of-way, and that no encroachment will result from new streets. 5. The consultation valuation conclusions apply to typical residences within the sample neighborhoods, and does not identify a specific property. Applying the results to unique properties (e.g., low-valued or obsolete residences, properties with unusually large or small sites, etc.) may not be appropriate, and should be made with care. Please contact the appraisers regarding applying the general value conclu-sions to any specific property. The above extraordinary assumptions might have affected the as- signment results. If these items were not true, the subject’s valuation would likely vary. Hypothetical Conditions HYPOTHETICAL CONDITION DEFINED (per USPAP): a condition, directly related to a specific assignment, which is contrary to what is known by the appraiser to exist on the effective date of the assignment results, but is used for the purpose of analysis. Hypothetical condi-tions are contrary to known facts about physical, legal, or economic characteristics of the subject property; or about conditions external to the property, such as market conditions or trends; or about the integrity of data used in an analysis. No hypothetical conditions were used in this assignment. 17GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN TYPE AND DEFINITION OF APPRAISED VALUE Type of Value The type of value appraised is the market value of the subject property as of the date stated. Market value is purely an economic concept. It differs from intrinsic value, value in use (value based upon a specific use) investment value (value to a specific investor), going concern value (value of a proven property operation which can include per- sonal property and business enterprise), insurable value, liquidation value, assessed value used for taxation purposes and based upon mass appraisal techniques, public interest value (e.g., conservation and preservation issues), and cost. Value is created by utility, scarcity, desire and effective purchasing power. From USPAP, market value is “a type of value, stated as an opinion, that presumes the transfer of a property (i.e., a right of ownership or a bundle of such rights), as of a certain date, under specific conditions set forth in the definition of the term identified by the appraiser as ap- plicable in an appraisal.” Market value incorporates several conditions/perspectives, and may vary from definition to definition, but generally fall into three categories: 1) The relationship, knowledge, and motivation of the parties (i.e., seller and buyer) 2) The terms of sale (e.g., cash, cash equivalent, or other terms) 3) The conditions of sale (e.g., exposure in a competitive market for a reasonable time period to sale) DATE OF APPRAISAL CONSULTATION AND PROPERTY RIGHTS Appraisal Dates The subject and other neighborhoods were inspected during August 2018. The date of value is the date much of the analysis was com- pleted - August 31, 2018 Property Rights Appraised Appraised is the fee simple interest subject to normal easements for drainage, public streets and utilities, if any. No personal property are included in the real estate values. Any deferred taxes, delinquent taxes, prior special assessments, de-ferred assessments, unpaid utility charges, payable association dues, or any other levies/liens on the subjects are assumed to be paid. The impact of any existing mortgages are not included in the appraisal. Market Value Definition The definition of “Market Value” as utilized in this report is: The most probable price, as of a specified date, in cash, or in terms equivalent to cash, or in other precisely revealed terms, for which the specified property rights should sell after reason- able exposure in a competitive market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, with the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and for self-interest, and assuming that neither is under undue duress. Source: The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, Sixth Edition, published in 2015 by the Appraisal Institute This definition is compatible with federal agencies that regulate feder- ally insured financial institutions, which define market value as: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by un- due stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: 1. Buyer and seller are typically motivated; 2. Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interest; 3. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open mar-ket; 4. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and 5. The price represents the normal consideration for the prop- erty sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. The above definitions require analysis on property value for any spe- cial or creative financing or sales concessions which can occur in transactions in depressed markets. 18 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SIGNIFICANT ASSIGNMENT CONDITIONS Summary of Appraisal Problem Elsewhere within this report are described the identification of client and intended users, the intended use of appraisal, the type and defini- tion of value, the date of value, the identification of property character- istics and property rights, extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical assumptions. Overview: Edina’s special assessment policy and history is assessing 100% of the cost for street reconstruction, and none for curb & gutter, sidewalks and utilities. Edina’s assessment policy is well established to fully assess for streets, though is offset with lower general taxes for the community. The appraisers estimate 1/3 of Edina streets have been reconstructed since the mid-2000s. Costs have been increasing. Most assessment amounts were in the $4,000 to $10,000/lot range in the mid-2000s, $6,000 to $12,000/lot range in the early-2010s, and $8,000 to $14,000/lot in recent years. Some currently pending and proposals for future streets are in the $9,000 to $18,000, with Rolling Green being proposed at over $26,000 if the project were to happen in the near future. During 2005, we completed a detailed consultation assignment for the City of Edina pertaining to street reconstruction assessment policy. We understand that costs have increased in recent years, and that the City is seeking to update its special assessment policy pertaining to street reconstruction. Significant time has transpired since 2005 and the City has adopted a policy to fully assess for streets and not for utili- ties, sidewalks, nor curb & gutters. Good market data was available and analyzed in our development of credible value opinion applied to 3 subject neighborhoods. No special appraisal problems were encountered. Competency: The appraisers have the necessary State of MN ap- praisal certifications/licenses, education, experience and resources to competently complete this appraisal assignment. Please refer to the Qualifications of Appraisers section of this report for additional back- ground on the appraisers. Significant Assignment Conditions The consulting assignment includes value opinions; hence, an ap-praisal that has been completed in compliance with USPAP, and in conformity to the Code of Professional Ethics & Standards of Profes- sional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. This appraisal includes proposed roadway improvements, and how it benefits typical properties within the subject sample neighborhoods. It does not apply to any specific property. Applying the results to unique properties (e.g., low-valued or obsolete residences, properties with un-usually large or small sites, etc.) may not be appropriate, and should be made with care. Please contact the appraisers regarding applying the general value conclusions to any specific property. Appraisal based upon the conditions stated within the prior Hypotheti-cal Conditions and Extraordinary Assumptions section of this report. See Scope of Work Used to Develop Appraisal section of this report. There are no client assignment conditions that result in predetermined opinions or conclusions, that favor the cause of the client, result in favorable compensation, or precludes the appraiser’s impartiality. No assignment conditions have been accepted that are based upon speculative/unsupported highest and best use conclusions, unaccept- ed appraisal theories, or upon unsubstantiated legal opinions. 19GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN TYPE OF REPORT Overview Based upon the intended use and intended users of the appraisal, the current USPAP Standards Rule 2-2 requires a written real property ap- praisal report to be prepared under one the following options: Restricted Appraisal Report - may be used when the intended users do not include parties other than the client. This option allows the ap-praiser to more succinctly “state” the appraisal techniques employed, the highest and best use conclusions, and value opinions, with sup- porting work retained in the workfile. Appraisal Report - must be used when the intended users include par-ties more than the client. This option requires the appraiser to “sum- marize” the appraisal techniques employed, the highest and best use conclusions, and value opinions, with additional supporting work re-tained in the workfile. The difference between the options is the content and level of informa- tion provided in the report. Again, the option is dependent upon the intended use and the intended users of the appraisal. Type of Report The reporting option utilized for this consultation is “Appraisal Report,” with additional support retained in our workfile. The report is written for the intended users, and assumes familiarity with real estate and appraisal terminology and analysis techniques. Please contact the appraiser if an intended user’s agent is unfamiliar with real estate ter- minology or methodologies employed in this appraisal consultation assignment. 20 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SCOPE OF WORK USED TO DEVELOP APPRAISAL CONSULTATION Scope of Work Definition and Overview Scope of work is defined by USPAP as “the type and extent of re-search and analyses in an appraisal or appraisal review assignment.” Scope of work (SOW) includes: 1. The extent to which the property is identified 2. The extent to which tangible property is inspected 3. The type and extent of data researched 4. The type and extent of analysis applied to arrive at opinions or conclusion The appraisal problem has been adequately disclosed within other sections of this report. On the following pages and within the various sections of this report, the SOW performed is shown. Scope of Work Elements The appraisers have personally conducted drive-thru inspections of the subject sample neighborhoods, along with many other neighborhoods in Edina. No one from the City accompanied the appraisers during the inspection. Documents available to the appraisers include historic and proposed street reconstruction costs and maps, overview of the current assessment policy, and several appraisals relating to the general market benefit of properties of specific reconstructed streets. Other public sources reviewed were plat maps, site plans, district topographic map, aerial photos, tax records, FEMA flood hazard map, published zoning map, published guide plan map, excerpts from published zoning code, traffic count maps and area demographic data. We have not appraised any specific property, but rather analyzed the market value benefit to a typical residential property from three sample neigh-borhoods - Morningside, Melody Lake, Rolling Green. Our study included the following work: 1. Resales - study of neighborhoods where new streets have recently occurred. This includes identifying and studying properties which sold both recently before and after the street reconstruction, to provide a value benefit indication. 2. Paired Sales - study of neighborhoods where new streets have recently occurred. Comparisons of different comparable properties which sold before and after new streets were made to produce value benefit indications. 3. Survey of Realtors - a number of Realtors active in Edina were contacted, most of which had direct involvement with a property having a new street. As presented on the following page, this current scope of work is reduced from the first analysis completed during 2005. This current study focuses on Edina market transactions given the abundance of street reconstruction and sales data in recent years, and its unique community features and attraction. Numerous Edina resales were found, and most Edina paired sales are from within the same neighborhoods. While the current study has fewer market participant interviews, we have contacted a number of Realtors who sold Edina properties with new street pending or levied special assessments. Numerous Edina neighborhoods were studied for resales, while the focus of paired sales are Edina neighborhoods having similar features to the 3 subject sample neighborhoods (Morningside, Melody Lake and Rolling Green). With consideration of the value indications from the resales and paired sales using a traditional valuation tool, along with conversations with real estate professionals, we have included market value benefit opinions for the identified/impacted subject neighborhoods. Exterior inspections of new street neighborhoods have been made, yet specific properties and comparables have not been viewed. The appraisers signing this consultation report accept full professional responsibility for all of the analyses and conclusions contained within this report. The data used was obtained from sources considered credible, yet its accuracy is not guaranteed. 21GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN OVERVIEW OF THE 2005 STUDY 2005 Scope of Work & Summary of Results During 2005, we had completed a detailed consultation assignment for the City of Edina pertaining to street reconstruction assessment policy. The scope of work was more expansive in 2005, which included 30 combined resales & paired sales, survey of numerous property owners who recently experienced a street reconstruction, survey of 32 Real- tors who are active in Edina, and a survey of 22 experienced profes-sional real estate appraisers. Like this current analysis, several neighborhoods were identified by the client, having differing lot sizes (South Harriet Park, Sunnyslope, and Rolling Green). In our earlier work, the resales and paired sales supported market value benefit. The average benefit were measured at $10,794 from the resales, and $20,258 from paired sales ($14,202 excluding ex- treme indications). The prior study also included positive value opinions from surveys of appraisers, Realtors and homeowners who had experienced new streets. Of the 22 appraisers surveyed, 20 of the responses ex- pressed a positive opinion of new street improvements, with the great-est benefit for those properties having the poorest street conditions before replacement. Likewise, the past Realtor comments were generally positive. Many indicated there would be a return, or partial return, on the costs/as-sessments, either immediately or at some point in the future. Homeowners’ expressed opinions were less uniform in 2005. They were asked to give a scale rating about the impact new streets have on their property value. The wide range of opinions ranged from “no benefit” to “significant benefit”. Most indicated at least some value benefit was attributed to new streets, though no obvious theme was ascertained. The 2005 summary conclusions were: n South Harriet Park WITH curb & gutter: $9,000 to $10,000, or 1.8% to 2.0% on a typical $500,000 residence n Sunnyslope without curb & gutter: $10,000 to $12,000, or 1.3% to 1.6% on a typical $750,000 residence n Rolling Green without curb & gutter: $14,000 to $16,000, or 0.9% to 1.1% on a typical $1.5 million residence 22 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 23GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION Community Description The City of Edina is a fully-developed first-tier suburb known for its strong demographics, shopping, dining, parks & recreation, good school district and convenient access. It had a 2017 population of 52,497, and is located just west of the City of Minneapolis and 9 miles SW of downtown Min-neapolis. Surrounding communities include Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Bloomington and Richfield. It has a good close-in location with convenient access routes to all portions of the metropolitan area. State Highway 100 (north-south) and Highway 62/Crosstown (east-west) divide the community into four sections. Interstate 494 runs east-west along the southern border and State Highway 169 runs north-south along the western border of Edina. Demographics are rated very good - increasing population/households supporting retail uses and elevated household income. Major employers in the city include BI Worldwide, the City of Edina, Dow/FilmTec Corporation, Edina Public Schools, Edina Realty, Fairview Southdale Hospital, Jerry’s Enterprises, Lunds & Byerlys, Regis Corporation, and SpartanNash. Edina has numerous retail shopping centers, including a regional shopping mall, Southdale Center, the Galleria, Yorktown, Centennial Lakes Plaza, and a thriving downtown area located at 50th Street & France Avenue, known as “50th & France.” There are 3 golf courses - Edina Country Club, Interlachen Country Club and Braemar. Numerous neighborhood parks & trails are scattered throughout the community and Lake Harriet, a popular Minneapolis lake, is within one mile. Development includes large residential districts built in the 1940’s thru 1960’s, some multi-family residential projects, numerous neighborhood parks, industrial uses at its southern border developed largely in the 1950’s & 1960’s, commercial/retail districts along heavily-traveled France Avenue, and office complexes along France Avenue & State Highways 100 & 62/Crosstown. Property condition is rated above average. All residential sites have been developed, yet some small infill redevelopment is available. Very strong residential values, low property taxes and a favorable reputation have spurred renovations, teardowns and reconstruction. Average single-family home prices in Edina are strong and have been increasing, particularly for lower-priced homes (see MLS graph later in this section). Overall, it is a strong community having much upper- valued housing commanding good demand and a stable future. Regional Map 24 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Community Map 25GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Aerial Map ROLLINGGREEN MELODYLAKE 50th St France AveUS Hwy 169State Hwy 6 2 / Crosstown State Hwy 100I-494 26 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Sources: U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census, Metropolitan Council Annual Estimates, and Metropolitan Council Forecasts Sources: U.S. Census Bureau Decennial Census and American Community Survey 27GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Edina Average & Median Single-Family Home Prices per MLS (2008-2018) 28 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMMUNITY DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) City of Edina Map of Tear Down/Rebuilt Homes Mud Lake LakeEdina Mi r r o r L a k e Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake M e l o d y L a k e LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake Minne h a h a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine M i l e C r e e k Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadCity of Edina Local Bituminous Street Reconstruction History and Tear Down Rebuilds Legend Tear Down Rebuild 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Street Recon 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 / Engineering DeptJune, 2015 29GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUBJECT NEIGHBORHOODS LOCATION MAP Melody Lake Rolling Green Morningside 30 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 31GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Morningside Neighborhood Overview The Morningside Neighborhood contains 750± homes and is located in the northeast corner of Edina, adjacent to the city of Minneapolis to the east and St. Louis Park to the north. It is generally bordered by 40th St W to the north, France Ave S to the east, Sunnyside Rd to the south, and Oakdale Ave S to the west. It was the first residential neighborhood in Edina, having some of the area’s oldest homes and many recent teardowns. Morningside is an appealing, fully-developed single-family residential neighborhood with an urban feel. Lot sizes generally range from 0.15-acre to 0.50-acre, with most being between 0.15-acre and .30-acre. Values commonly are in the $400,000 to $800,000 range, with some being over $1 million - particularly for new construction. The average sale price in the neighborhood since 2014 is around $700,000. MLS data depicts increasing values of late, especially with an elevated lev-el of teardowns/rebuilds. In the western portion of the neighborhood where reconstruction is proposed, most of the homes were construct-ed in the 1940’s and 1950’s. The eastern portion features the oldest homes, with some built in the early 1900’s. Zoning is generally R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District, with a very small commercially-zoned dis-trict in the SE corner along France Ave. The topography is generally level, though there are areas having some sloping. There are many mature trees, several parks and streams. The subject soils appear and are assumed to be stable. All typical utili-ties and services are available including public sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, electrical service and natural gas. Most of the development does not appear to be within a mapped spe- cial flood hazard area as determined by FEMA. There is a moderate-sized area in the NE corner that lies within Zone A (1% chance of annual flooding) and is mostly parkland. For purposes of this study, it appears and is assumed that no residences lie in the designated flood zone. There is good access to collector routes and highways. The 2015- 16 traffic counts on France Ave ranged from 9200 to 11,200 vehicles per day (north-south). Traffic counts on bisecting 44th St W near the southern border ranged from 3350 to 4400 vehicles per day in 2017 (east-west). Morningside Neighborhood Proposed Street Improvements (Western Portion) Streets in the western portion of the neighborhood are old and in need of repairs (street work was completed in the eastern portion during 2014). Current roads in this area are two-lane bituminous residential streets and generally have curb and gutter. They appear to be in poor condition having some evidence of settlement, cracks, potholes, dete- riorating edges and patching. There is average street lighting, dated public improvements and some public sidewalks. Reconstruction is proposed for approx. 3.5 miles of residential streets within the western section. Preliminary projected city costs per unit range from $5,557 to $9,405. These amounts reflect Edina’s policy of assessing 100% of the cost of reconstructed roadway improvements, net of the costs of curb & gutter and sidewalks which are borne by the city. A location map, aerial image, and neighborhood photographs are shown on the following pages. Neighborhood Map (colored portions having older roads) 32 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Aerial Map of Entire Neighborhood 33GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) MLS Median and Average Price Trends for the Morningside Neighborhood Sale Price, Median 34 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Representative Photographs of Morningside Properties 35GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Representative Photographs of Morningside Street Improvements 36 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 37GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MELODY LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Melody Lake Neighborhood Overview The Melody Lake neighborhood is located just north of the center of Edina. It is generally bordered just south of Our Lady of Grace Church & School to the north, State Hwy 100/Normandale Rd to the east, Ben-ton Ave to the south, and 56th St W & railroad tracks to the west. One of its attractions is Melody Lake and park. Melody Lake is an appealing, fully-developed single-family residential neighborhood featuring many mid-century ramblers and split-levels built in the 1950’s. Lot sizes generally range from 0.25-acre to 0.40- acre, and values commonly range from $375,000 to $700,000, with some higher-value newer construction homes. The average sale price in the neighborhood since 2014 is around $500,000. Residences on Melody Lake generally have larger lots and higher values; MLS data depicts increasing values. Zoning is R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The topography is somewhat rolling, and there are many mature trees. The subject soils appear and are assumed to be stable. The development, including Melody Lake, does not appear to be within a mapped special flood hazard area as determined by FEMA. For purposes of this study, it appears and is assumed that no residences lie in the designated flood zone. All typical utilities and services are available including public sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, electrical service and natural gas. There is very good access to collector routes and highways. Traffic counts in 2015-16 were 97,000 & 4050 vehicles per day on adjacent Hwy 100 & Benton Ave, respectively. Melody Lake Neighborhood Proposed Street Improvements Streets in the neighborhood are old and in need of repairs. Current roads in this area are two-lane bituminous residential streets, most having no curb and gutter. They appear to be in poor condition having some evidence of settlement, cracks, potholes, deteriorating edges and patching. There is average street lighting, dated public improve-ments and no public sidewalks. Reconstruction is proposed for over 3.5 miles of residential streets. Preliminary projected city costs per unit range from $13,088 to $14,764. These amounts reflect Edina’s policy of assessing 100% of the cost of reconstructed roadway improvements, net of the costs of curb & gutter and sidewalks which are borne by the city. A location map, aerial image, and neighborhood photographs are shown on the following pages. Neighborhood Map (colored portions having older roads) 38 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MELODY LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Aerial Map of Entire Neighborhood 39GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MELODY LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) MLS Median and Average Price Trends for the Melody Lake Neighborhood 40 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MELODY LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Representative Photographs of Melody Lake Properties 41GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN MELODY LAKE NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Representative Photographs of Melody Lake Street Improvements 42 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 43GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN ROLLING GREEN NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Rolling Green Neighborhood Overview The Rolling Green neighborhood is situated on Edina’s northern bor- der with St. Louis Park. It is bordered by two golf courses - Mead- owbrook to the north and Interlachen Country Club to the west. The Hilldale residential neighborhood lies to the east, and Interlachen Blvd is its southern boundary. This desirable area has had a number of teardowns. Rolling Green is an appealing, fully-developed, upscale single-family residential neighborhood with good residential views. Lot sizes are generally near 1 acre, yet several sites are much larger; the largest of which is 15 acres. Values commonly range from approx. $2 million to $3 million; though the highest indicated sale price in the past sev- eral years was approaching $5 million. The average sale price in the neighborhood since 2014 is around $2.5 million. MLS data for Rolling Green is limited and depicts generally steady sale prices, common for upper-valued properties given the current market conditions where the lower-end market has experienced the majority of activity. Most of the original homes were constructed in the late 1930’s and 1940’s, yet there are many newer residences due to the recent trend of buyers purchasing properties for their land value, razing the buildings, and constructing new homes. Zoning is R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The topography is rolling with many mature trees. The subject soils appear and are assumed to be stable. Most of the development does not appear to be within a mapped spe- cial flood hazard area as determined by FEMA. There is a moderate- sized area in the NE corner that lies within Zone AE (1% chance of an-nual flooding). For purposes of this study, it appears and is assumed that no residences lie in the designated flood zone. All typical utilities and services are available including public sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer, electrical service and natural gas. There is good access to collector routes and highways. The 2016 traf-fic count on Interlachen Blvd was 9100 vehicles per day. Rolling Green Neighborhood Proposed Street Improvements Streets in the neighborhood are old and in need of repairs; there are numerous patches and overlays. Current roads in this area are two-lane bituminous residential streets with no curb and gutter. They appear to be in poor condition having some evidence of settlement, cracks, potholes, deteriorating edges and patching. There is average street lighting, dated public improvements and no public sidewalks. Reconstruction is proposed for over 2 miles of residential streets. Pre-liminary projected city cost per unit is $26,412. This amount reflects Edina’s policy of assessing 100% of the cost of reconstructed roadway improvements, net of the costs of curb & gutter and sidewalks which are borne by the city. A location map, aerial image, and neighborhood photographs are shown on the following pages. 44 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN ROLLING GREEN NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Aerial Map Meadowbrook Golf Course Interlachen Country Club Interlachen Country Club Interlachen Blvd 45GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN ROLLING GREEN NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) MLS Median and Average Price Trends for the Rolling Green Neighborhood 46 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN ROLLING GREEN NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Representative Photographs of Rolling Green Properties 47GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN ROLLING GREEN NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION (CONTINUED) Representative Photographs of Rolling Green Street Improvements 48 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 49GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN OVERVIEW OF NEW STREETS AND ANALYSIS Comments Proposed for the three subject neighborhoods are new public streets. Due to their old age, the significant deterioration, the high annual re- pair costs, and to the limited remaining useful life, new streets are a prudent decision. Moreover, Edina residents desire and expect good public services, including proper upkeep and replacements of public infrastructure. Most of the subject neighborhood’s streets have no curb and gutter. As a result, deterioration, storm water drainage damage and snow plow damage is amplified. Drainage also is less efficient. Some have expressed a preferred “country look” of not having curb and gutter. These generally are within the larger-site subdivisions, such as Rolling Green, where no sidewalks are preferred. Morningside, Melody Lake, and Rolling Green have had surface patch- ing to lengthen life, but all have older streets with notable deterioration, and appear to be near the end of their useful life. Hence, new streets are a significant betterment which can be supported from the market. There has been an established and accepted practice of street recon- struction being fully assessed within Edina. Once a new street has been completed and paid for, property owners are well-informed that future special assessments will not be a consideration. The opposite is also true where ownership within neighborhoods with dated streets will be looking at an assessment in the future. Edina is somewhat unique. Many other communities assess only a portion of costs, with a large balance being funded from general taxes. Many of these policies are designed to keep contested appeals to a minimum. The new street/old street valuation variation may be re- duced in other communities since street replacement will be funded from general taxes and not by the benefitting property owners. For example, in Minnetonka owners of properties within old street neigh-borhoods will not need to bear the cost of street reconstruction. With Edina’s strong market with upper values, low general taxes and a de- sire/expectation for good public services and infrastructure, the market acceptance of assessments where benefit can be shown is good. Cost Trends New street costs include subgrade work, complete street reconstruc-tion, improved storm sewer facilities, new bituminous pavement, and driveway connections. Below grade utilities, curb and gutter, and side-walks are not assessed. Costs have been increasing. Past assessments in the $5,000 to $10,000 range have increased, with some neighborhoods having lev- ied (and pending) assessments in the $12,000 to $18,000 range dur-ing the last few years. Some neighborhoods have had higher costs. With larger-scope projects and larger-site neighborhoods going for- ward, higher costs are continuing to be projected. Evidence of rising costs is seen from multiple sources that have been researched. General building costs according to Marshall Valuation Service are up about 40% since 2005. FRED Economic Research reports costs of construction sand/gravel/crushed stone being up 70% since 2005, and asphalt paving being up 95%. Additionally, the Mary- land Asphalt Association reports costs being up 144% in that state since 2005. As costs rise, assessments rise. The three subject neighborhoods have reported and City-provided projected per lot reconstruction costs/assessment of $5,557 to $9,405 for Morningside with small lots, $13,088 to $14,764 for Melody Lake with moderate-size lots, and $26,412 for Rolling Green with large lots. Historically, Rolling Green is at the high end and few other projects have been over $20,000/lot. 50 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN OVERVIEW OF NEW STREETS AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Historical Assessment Map Morningside Melody Lake Rolling Green 51GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN OVERVIEW OF NEW STREETS AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) New Street Benefit The utility and appeal of the public improvements will be enhanced, with the result that the overall neighborhood will be strengthened. It eliminates the risk of future street replacement, enhances curb ap-peal and the reputation of the neighborhood, helps promote property upkeep, renovation, landscape improvements, and extends the life of the district. Intuitively, as an improvement ages and deteriorates to the point of having limited remaining life, it is prudent to replace the asset. When there is notable life remaining in an improvement, the added value for replacement is somewhat below the cost. Again, it depends upon the condition of the existing improvements. Appeal and value enhancement can result from the following specific factors: n Elimination of potholes and street-edge ruts n Reduced damage to both streets and lawns from snow plows and vehicles when a bulkhead curb is used n Increased aesthetic appeal of new streets n Greatly lengthens the life of the public improvements serving the needs of the neighborhood n Promotion of properties installing new driveways and updat-ed site improvements n Appeal for families having better streets for children riding bikes, using roller blades, strollers, etc. n Smoother ride for vehicles n Superior drainage n Reduced annual maintenance disruptions n New public improvements reduce risk of future special as-sessments for a new buyer n Reduce marketing times for properties offered for sale n Enhancement in neighborhoods where visitor street parking is used n Enhancement where unsightly dated wood timbers or boul-ders or other barriers at roadside are no longer needed n Extends the life cycle of a neighborhood n Reduces potential buyer objection to a neighborhood or prop-erty n Elimination of a future assessment n Encourages neighborhood revitalization and investment, in- cluding major remodeling or new construction dwellings 52 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN OVERVIEW OF NEW STREETS AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Market Conditions Market conditions (or value change over time), is a significant adjust- ment category used both in the resales and paired sales analyses. Generally, many of the study properties summarized in this report have a 1 to 4 year timeframe to adequately reflect the market before and after the new streets. Market trends have been researched in several market areas: the City of Edina, combination of nearby cities (Edina, Eden Prairie, Bloom- ington, Minnetonka), Hennepin County, and the 16-county Twin Cities MSA. In addition, segmenting market trends under and over $500,000 has been completed. On the following page are graphs showing the annual median sale prices in both Edina, and nearby communities, by price segment. Market conditions in recent years have seen the most improvement for lower-valued properties, while high-end homes have been much more flat over the last 10 years. Based on the market conditions analysis supported for Edina, values have increased, yet much greater for the lower value market. Specific annual conclusions are detailed below. Annual Rate Time Adjustment Conclusions: Up to $400,000: +5%$400,000 to $450,000: +4% $450,000 to $500,000: +3%$500,000 to $600,000: +2% Over $600,000: +1% Overview of Valuation Analysis The more detailed study, including an analysis of market data, is found later within this report. Our study has included the following work: 1. Resales analysis - study of neighborhoods where new streets have recently occurred. This includes identifying and study- ing properties which sold twice, both before and after the street reconstruction, providing a value benefit indication. 2. Paired sales analysis - study of neighborhoods where new streets have recently occurred. Comparisons of different comparable properties which sold before and after new streets were made to produce value benefit indications. 3. Survey of Realtors who are active in Edina, many of whom have been involved with new street properties. 53GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN OVERVIEW OF NEW STREETS AND ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 54 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 55GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Overview In this section of the report are the detailed adjustment analysis of resales in Edina. This is a same property which has sold both before and after a street reconstruction. After adjusting for differences (mar- ket conditions, remodeling or other improvements), the price varia-tion is an indication of the street benefit. All reported sale prices are adjusted downward for any seller concessions reported, and upward for any special assessment balance assumed by the buyer. Market conditions adjusted based upon conclusions from the prior section. We have expended much effort and time identifying meaningful prop- erties that can be analyzed. A total of 26 properties have been used for detailed study; 22 have indicated positive value benefit while 4 indi- cated no (negative) value benefit. Following are summary tables and charts. Due to market irregularities/anomalies, a few resales indicate a negative benefit, and a few indicate exorbitant amounts. The major- ity, however, indicate a typical benefit of $10,000 to $30,000. Market value benefit is supported. The average and median bene- fit indications are summarized to the right - shown is summary data from all properties, plus from excluding extreme indications (negative amounts, and those above $40,000). Following are summary tables of the resales sets, scattergram charts of the indicated benefits, and the detailed adjustment grids. The following general conclusions have been made: n Measurable market value benefit is supported n Benefit as a percentage of total value is low, yet the dollar amount is significant n Scattergrams with computer-generated trend lines indicate increasing benefit as lot size increases n Greater benefit is possible for higher-priced properties n While the benefit as a percentage of total value decreases as property values increase, the dollar benefit amount is sig- nificant for high-priced properties. For example, a 2.0% ben-efit on a $1,500,000 property results in a benefit amount of $30,000 RESALES ANALYSIS Summary Table Average Median New Street Sale Price $617,764 $524,615 Lot Size 0.31 acres 0.31 acres Indicated Value Benefit - all properties $16,764 $18,300 % Value Benefit - all properties 3.01%2.85% Indicated Value Benefit - net of extremes $17,595 $19,000 % Value Benefit - net of extremes 3.53%3.08% 56 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Set Address Sale Price - New Street Lot Size Value Benefit Percentage of Total Neighborhood 1 5101 Halifax Ave S $1,402,500 0.20 $17,600 1.25%Arden Park 2 5124 Valley View Rd $456,600 0.37 $24,632 5.39%Birchcrest 3 6134 Arctic Way $674,500 0.48 $31,500 4.67%Bredesen Park 4 6505 Polar Circle $516,350 0.37 $6,350 1.23%Bredesen Park 5 5949 Walnut Dr $411,000 0.27 -$30,000 -7.30%Bredesen Park 6 5512 Hunter St $1,184,019 0.40 $12,019 1.02%Countryside 7 5805 Tracy Ave $283,000 0.40 $26,000 9.19%Countryside 8 6108 Westridge Blvd $1,055,000 0.40 $45,000 4.27%Countryside 9 5821 Arbour Ave $532,880 0.25 -$23,120 -4.34%Countryside 10 5932 Grove St $419,000 0.25 $19,000 4.53%Countryside 11 7429 Hyde Park Ln $826,000 0.25 -$3,000 -0.36%Dewey Hill 12 5620 Wooddale Ave $602,417 0.19 $6,964 1.16%Golf Terrace 13 5016 Richmond Dr $404,337 0.20 $29,087 7.19%Grandview 14 5036 Richmond Dr $353,500 0.20 $22,600 6.39%Grandview 15 300 Grove Pl $363,573 0.36 $15,179 4.17%Interlachen Park 16 309 John St $662,747 0.36 $14,747 2.23%Interlachen Park 17 6433 Sherwood Ave $371,500 0.36 $20,250 5.45%Lake Cornelia 18 4949 Poppy Ln $613,500 0.36 $12,500 2.04%Lake Edina 19 4224 Scott Terrace $472,000 0.17 $51,970 11.01%Morningside 20 4245 Scott Terrace $591,500 0.23 $4,600 0.78%Morningside 21 6224 Chowen Ave $481,100 0.32 $100 0.02%Strachauer Park 22 4081 Sunnyside Rd $1,025,000 0.61 $27,000 2.63%White Oaks 23 5408 Valley Ln $447,460 0.30 -$6,040 -1.35%Normandale Park 24 6411 Limerick Dr $449,920 0.34 $21,170 4.71%Normandale Park 25 5000 Bruce Ave $720,000 0.26 $66,750 9.27%Arden Park 26 5113 Indianola Ave $747,900 0.19 $23,000 3.08%Arden Park Average $617,973 0.31 $16,764 3.01% Median $524,615 0.31 $18,300 2.85%Extremes (neg & >$40k)Average w/o Extremes $610,682 0.33 $17,595 3.53%Median w/o Extremes $516,350 0.36 $19,000 3.08% Summary of Resale Value Benefit Indications 57GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 58 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5101 Halifax Avenue S , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4473259 Welcome to 5101 Halifax Ave Beautiful Great Room features interesting ceiling details Stunning Kitchen features Butlers Pantry, Custom cabinetry, and ceiling details Unique Island Design and 2 Dishwashers Spacious Master Bath Walkin Tiled Shower with Spa Bench RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 1 Indicated before and after benefit: $17,600 Percentage of after sale price: 1.25% Subject is from the Arden Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original levied assessment amount of $12,704. The buyer as- sumed the outstanding balance, which was added to the subject sale price. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $1,349,900 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing TermsConditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $35,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 8 4 3.50 8 4 3.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0Basement Area 1723 1723 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/DeckFireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements OtherNet Adjustment (Total)$35,000 Adjusted Sale Price $1,384,900 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 5101 Halifax Ave S 5101 Halifax Ave S $1,402,500 $398.78 $383.82 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 3/3/17 7/31/14 Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market termsArm's length Arm's length Level, mostly open Level, mostly open Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2015 0.20 0.20 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-story Luxury Luxury None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 3517 3517sf, below grade sf, below grade 2014 2014 Good, modest recent improvements including garage heater and décor elements New construction FA/AC FA/AC Good Good 1723 sf finished, FR, 1 BR, bath, exercise room, athletic court, very good 1723 sf finished, FR, 1 BR, bath, exercise room, athletic court, very good Average Average 1 1 Good Good Attached 3-car garage Attached 3-car garage Patio Patio Average Average Resale Set 1 5101 Halifax Avenue S , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4755059 Subject Comp 1 59GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5124 Valley View Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4180464 A Medallion built home! Wonderful construction and quality throughout. Large sun filled formal dining room with built in cabinets. Corner windows offer a tree top setting for special meals. Large open foyer with slate tile.New carpet in the upper level bedrooms! Master bedroom....Walk through master bathroom RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 2 Indicated before and after benefit: $24,632 Percentage of after sale price: 5.39% Subject is from the Birchcrest Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original levied assessment amount of $12,344. The buyer as- sumed the outstanding balance, which was added to the subject sale price. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $333,968Price/GLAData Source Verification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $63,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $20,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 5 2 1.00 5 2 1.00 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1468 1468 $0 Basement Finishing $15,000 Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements Other $0 Net Adjustment (Total)$98,000 Adjusted Sale Price $431,968 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 5124 Valley View Rd 5124 Valley View Rd $456,600$311.04 $227.50 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records 6/15/17 10/31/12 Birchcrest neighborhood Birchcrest neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Level, some trees Level, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2015 0.37 0.37 Public, poor street None apparent 3-level split 3-level split Above average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 1468 1468 sf, walkout sf, walkout 1962 1962 Above average, updated kitchen, recent remodeling included flooring, patio door, garage door, radon mitigation system, water heater Average to above average, generally older finishing, updated kitchen FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 408 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, laundry, recent lower level finishing 408 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, laundry, avg Average Average 1 1 Average Average Tuck-under 2-car garage Tuck-under 2-car garage Patio Patio Above average Above average Resale Set 2 5124 Valley View Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4818741 Floor to ceiling windows draw you in to the easy flowing living spaces Welcome home to 5124 Valley View Rd in Edina's Birchcrest neighborhood Dramatic double door entry foyer invites you home Unique architectural features to enjoy Modern finishes and classical design combine beautifully Perfect spaces for gatherings of any size Subject Comp 1 60 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 6134 Arctic Way , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 3888753 Fabulous walk out rambler on spacious lot in classic family neighborhood! NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/4/18, 12:59 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 3 Indicated before and after benefit: $31,500 Percentage of after sale price: 4.67% Subject is from the Bredesen Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2012. Original levied assessment amount of $6,951, which had been paid off. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $585,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $30,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $20,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 7 3 1.75 7 3 1.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 2100 2100 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient ItemsGarage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras $8,000Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$58,000 Adjusted Sale Price $643,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #16134 Arctic Way 6134 Arctic Way $674,500 $321.19 $278.57 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records 7/31/15 6/15/10 Bredesen Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Significant downward slope to the rear, some trees Significant downward slope to the rear, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2012 0.48 0.48 Public, poor streetNone apparent 1-story rambler 1-story rambler Above average Above average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 2100 2100 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1971 1971 Good, recent remodeling included bathroom Good FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 2100 sf finished, FR, rec room, hobby room, BR, bath, good 2100 sf finished, FR, rec room, hobby room, BR, bath, good Average Average 2 2 Sport court Average Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Patio, porch Patio, porch Average Average Resale Set 3 6134 Arctic Way , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4607998 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/4/18, 1:00 PM Subject Comp 1 61GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 6505 Polar Circle , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4013391 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/4/18, 12:54 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 4 Indicated before and after benefit: $6,350 Percentage of after sale price: 1.23% Subject is from the Bredesen Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2012. Original levied assessment amount of $6,181, which had been paid off. Some minor adjustment is merited due to improve- ments made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price $475,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $31,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of ConstructionYear Built Condition $4,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 9 4 2.75 9 4 2.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0Basement Area 1626 1626 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$35,000 Adjusted Sale Price $510,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #16505 Polar Circle 6505 Polar Circle $516,350 $189.56 $174.38 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records 5/15/14 2/24/11 Bredesen Park Neighborhood Bredesen Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Mostly level, some trees Mostly level, some trees Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2012 0.37 0.37 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-story Average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 2724 2724sf, below grade sf, below grade 1986 1986 Average to above average, recent improvements included roof due to storm damage Average to above average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average Unfinished Unfinished Average Average 1 1 Average Average 3-car attached garage 3-car attached garage Deck Deck Average Average Resale Set 4 6505 Polar Circle , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4469916 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/4/18, 12:55 PM Subject Comp 1 62 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5949 Walnut Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4392438 RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 5 Indicated before and after benefit: -$30,000 Percentage of after sale price: -7.30% Subject is from the Bredesen Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original levied assessment amount of $8,272, which had been paid off. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATURE Address Proximity to Subject Sale Price $380,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $41,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $20,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 6 3 1.75 6 3 1.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1540 1540 $0 Basement Finishing Functional Utility Heating/Cooling Energy-Efficient ItemsGarage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site ImprovementsOther Net Adjustment (Total)$61,000Adjusted Sale Price $441,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 5949 Walnut Dr 5949 Walnut Dr $411,000 $195.71 $180.95 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 7/19/16 11/15/13 Bredesen Park Neighborhood Bredesen Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Mostly level and open Mostly level and open Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2014 0.27 0.27 Public, poor street None apparent 1-story rambler 1-story rambler Average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 2100 2100 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1956 1956 Above average, recent remodeling included bath, appliances Above average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 560 sf finished, FR, bath, average 560 sf finished, FR, bath, average Average Average 1 1 Average Average Tuck-under 2-car garage Tuck-under 2-car garage Patio Patio Average Average Resale Set 5 5949 Walnut Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4702236 Subject Comp 1 63GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5512 Hunter Street , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 3892382 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/4/18, 12:24 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 6 Indicated before and after benefit: $12,019 Percentage of after sale price: 1.02% Subject is from the Countryside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2012. Original pending assessments were $12,360; levied assess- ment amount of $11,369 which was assumed by the buyer. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $1,155,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $17,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 10 4 5.50 10 4 5.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0Basement Area 1828 1828 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$17,000Adjusted Sale Price $1,172,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #15512 Hunter St 5512 Hunter St $1,184,019$294.02 $286.81 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records 7/8/13 8/2/10 Countryside Neighborhood Countryside Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Flat and mostly open Flat and mostly open Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2012 0.40 0.40 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-story Luxury Luxury None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 4027 4027sf, below grade sf, below grade 1954, major remodel in 2006 1954, major remodel in 2006 Very good Very good FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverage 1196 sf finished, media room, BR, laundry, game room, good 1196 sf finished, media room, BR, laundry, game room, good Average Average 2 2 Good Good Attached 3-car garage Attached 3-car garage Patio Patio Average Average Resale Set 6 5512 Hunter Street , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4368493 Stately Craftsman 2 -Story on a .40/acre flat lot Living room Living room wth lots of windows and light Wolf oven, warming drawer & Wolf 6 burner gas range Built-in custom Sub-Zero refrigerator and a separate Sub- Zero Freezer Center Island with unique granite & a beverage refrigerator NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/4/18, 12:26 PM Subject Comp 1 64 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5805 Tracy Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 3959938 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/4/18, 12:43 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 7 Indicated before and after benefit: $26,000 Percentage of after sale price: 9.19% Subject is from the Countryside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2012. Original levied assessment amount of $11,369, which had been paid off. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price $216,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $41,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of ConstructionYear Built Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 5 2 1.00 8 4 3.50Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1040 1040 $0 Basement Finishing Functional Utility Heating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s)Extras Site Improvements OtherNet Adjustment (Total)$41,000 Adjusted Sale Price $257,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #15805 Tracy Ave 5805 Tracy Ave $283,000 $272.12 $207.69 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records 9/16/14 12/14/10 Countryside Neighborhood Countryside Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length General level, mostly open General level, mostly open Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2012 0.40 0.40 Public, poor street None apparent 1-story rambler 1-story rambler Average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 1040 1040 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1958 1958 Average, few updates Average, few updates FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 48 sf finished, bath, mostly unfinished 48 sf finished, bath, mostly unfinished Average Average 1 1AverageAverage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Deck Deck Average Average Resale Set 7 5805 Tracy Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4512625 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/4/18, 12:44 PM Subject Comp 1 65GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 6108 Westridge Boulevard , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 3907015 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/4/18, 12:29 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 8 Indicated before and after benefit: $45,000 Percentage of after sale price: 4.27% Subject is from the Countryside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2012. Original levied assessment amount of $11,369, which seller paid off. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $859,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing TermsConditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $36,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $50,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 9 4 2.50 9 4 2.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1500 1500 $0 Basement Finishing $65,000 Functional Utility Heating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s)Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$151,000Adjusted Sale Price $1,010,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 6108 Westridge Blvd 6108 Westridge Blvd $1,055,000 $349.11 $284.25 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 8/1/14 5/26/10 Countryside Neighborhood Countryside Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market termsArm's length Arm's length General level, mostly open General level, mostly open Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2012 0.40 0.40 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-storyLuxuryLuxury None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 3022 3022 sf, below grade sf, below grade 2010 2010 Very good, recent improvements include modest kitchen upgrades, hardwood flooring, landscaping pavers, gutters, some mechanicals New construction FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 1230 sf finished, FR, bath, BR, all recently finished Unfinished Average Average 1 1GoodGood Attached 3-car garage Attached 3-car garage Patio Patio Average Average Resale Set 8 6108 Westridge Boulevard , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4484262 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/4/18, 12:30 PM Subject Comp 1 66 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5821 Arbour Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4477888 RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 9 Indicated before and after benefit: -$23,120 Percentage of after sale price: -4.34% Subject is from the Countryside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original levied as- sessment amount of $9,538; there is no current balance - not sure if buyer or seller paid off. If assumed & paid by buyer, the negative benefit indication would be reduced. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price $500,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $39,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $15,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 8 4 2.50 8 4 3.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1132 1132 $0 Basement Finishing $2,000 Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$56,000 Adjusted Sale Price $556,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #15821 Arbour Ave 5821 Arbour Ave $532,880 $271.32 $254.58 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records 5/8/18 7/8/14 Countryside Neighborhood Countryside Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Sloping up to the rear, mostly open Sloping up to the rear, mostly open Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2015 0.25 0.25 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-storyAverageAverage None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 1964 1964 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1965 1965 Above average, recent remodeling included refinished hardwood floors, paint, AC, furnace, appliances Above average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 568 sf finished, FR, BR, remodeled 568 sf finished, FR, BR, avg Average Average 1 1 Average Average Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage 3-season porch, patio 3-season porch, patio Average Average Resale Set 9 5821 Arbour Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4901745 Subject Comp 1 67GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5932 Grove Street , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4440801 RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 10 Indicated before and after benefit: $19,000 Percentage of after sale price: 4.53% Subject is from the Countryside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original levied assessment amount of $9,630. The buyer as-sumed the outstanding balance, which was added to the subject sale price. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $345,000 Price/GLA Data SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $55,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of ConstructionYear Built Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 6 3 1.75 6 3 1.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1496 1496 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site ImprovementsOther Net Adjustment (Total)$55,000 Adjusted Sale Price $400,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 5932 Grove St 5932 Grove St $419,000 $213.67 $175.93 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 1/25/18 2/25/14 Countryside Neighborhood Countryside Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Some sloping and trees Some sloping and trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2015 0.25 0.20 Public, poor street None apparent 1-story rambler 1-story rambler Above average Above average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 1961 1961 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1961 1961 Average to above average Average to above average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 1346 sf finished, FR, BR, avg 1346 sf finished, FR, BR, avg Average Average 2 2 Average Average Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Deck Deck Average Average Resale Set 10 5932 Grove Street , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4894617 Subject Comp 1 68 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 7429 Hyde Park Lane , Edina, MN 55439 MLS Number: 4398791 RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 11 Indicated before and after benefit: -$3,000 Percentage of after sale price: -0.36% Subject is from the Dewey Hill Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original levied assessment amount of $9,862, assumed by the buyer. FEATURE Address Proximity to SubjectSale Price $805,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $24,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 10 4 2.50 10 4 2.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1897 1897 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site ImprovementsOther Net Adjustment (Total)$24,000 Adjusted Sale Price $829,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 7429 Hyde Park Ln 7429 Hyde Park Ln $826,000 $248.72 $242.40 Edina EdinaSame street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 10/27/16 11/15/13 Dewey Hill Neighborhood Dewey Hill Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Some sloping down to the rear, mostly open Some sloping down to the rear, mostly open Average residential, pond Average residential, pond Public, new street in 2015 0.25 0.25 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-storyGoodGood None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 3321 3321 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1978 1978 Good Good FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 1545 sf finished, FR, den, good 1545 sf finished, FR, den, Average Average 3 3 Above average Above average Attached 3-car garage Attached 3-car garage Deck, patio Deck, patio Average Average Resale Set 11 7429 Hyde Park Lane , Edina, MN 55439 MLS Number: 4730754 Subject Comp 1 69GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5620 Wooddale Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4566206 RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 12 Indicated before and after benefit: $6,984 Percentage of after sale price: 1.16% Subject is from the Golf Terrace Neighborhood, having new streets in 2016. Buyer assumed special assessments reported at $10,417, which was added to the subject sale price. FEATURE Address Proximity to Subject Sale Price $577,453 Price/GLA Data SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $18,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 9 4 2.50 9 4 2.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1314 1314 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$18,000 Adjusted Sale Price $595,453 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 5620 Wooddale Ave 5620 Wooddale Ave $602,417 $257.66 $246.99 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 6/30/17 6/30/15 Golf Terrace Neighborhood Golf Terrace Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Mostly level, some trees Mostly level, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2016 0.19 0.19 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-storyGoodGood None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 2338 2338 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1947 1947 Above average Above average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 306 sf finished, FR, average 306 sf finished, FR, average Average Average 1 1 Average Average Detached 2-car garage Detached 2-car garage Deck Deck Average Average Resale Set 12 5620 Wooddale Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4819522 Sought after East Edina homeCharming 2 story filled with character Sunny living room with wood-burning fireplace Main floor family room Family room opens to sun roomBreakfast nook Subject Comp 1 70 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5016 Richmond Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4011331 A distinctive brick and stucco Rambler. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/4/18, 11:31 AM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 13 Indicated before and after benefit: $29,087 Percentage of after sale price: 7.19% Subject is from the Grandview Neighborhood, having new streets in 2012. Original levied assessment amount of $10,337, understood to have been paid off. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $271,250Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing TermsConditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $79,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $25,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 5 2 1.00 5 2 1.00 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1155 1155 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/DeckFireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements OtherNet Adjustment (Total)$104,000 Adjusted Sale Price $375,250 Average Average 2 2 Average Average Detached 2-car garage Detached 2-car garage Deck Deck FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 1039 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, laundry, average 1039 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, laundry, average Average Average 1155 1155 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1949 1949 Above average, recent remodeling included modest bathroom & kitchen updates Average to above average 1-story rambler 1-story ramblerAverage to above average Average to above average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Mostly level and open Mostly level and open Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2012 0.20 0.20 Public, poor streetNone apparent 2/24/17 5/31/11 Grandview Neighborhood Grandview Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market termsArm's length Arm's length DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records $350.08 $234.85 Edina Edina Same street SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #15016 Richmond Dr 5016 Richmond Dr $404,337 Resale Set 13 5016 Richmond Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4778259 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/4/18, 11:32 AM Subject Comp 1 71GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5036 Richmond Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 3865477 Great value in Edina! Stone & wood front rambler--south facing! NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/4/18, 11:36 AM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 14 Indicated before and after benefit: $22,600 Percentage of after sale price: 6.39% Subject is from the Grandview Neighborhood, having new streets in 2012. Original levied assessment amount of $14,209. The buyer as-sumed the outstanding balance of approx $13,000, which was added to the subject sale price. Some adjustment is merited due to improve- ments made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $226,900 Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $59,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $45,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 6 3 1.00 6 3 1.00 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1242 1242 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$104,000 Adjusted Sale Price $330,900 Average Average 2 2 Average Average Attached 1-car garage Attached 1-car garage None None FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 989 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, average 989 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, average Average Average 1242 1242 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1950 1950 Above average, recent remodeling included bathroom, kitchen, bamboo flooring & roof Average to above average 1-story rambler 1-story rambler Average to above average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Some sloping, mostly open Some sloping, mostly open Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2012 0.20 0.20 Public, poor streetNone apparent 6/11/15 5/7/10 Grandview Neighborhood Grandview Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records $284.62 $182.69 Edina Edina Same street SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #15036 Richmond Dr 5036 Richmond Dr $353,500 Resale Set 14 5036 Richmond Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4567883 Welcome to 5036 Richmond Dr Recently updated kitchen with open concept. Vaulted ceilings in dining room Spacious dining area with an island containing a breakfast bar New granite counters and stainless appliances Freshly painted living room with bamboo floors. Large picture window in the front of the house. Main level bathroom completely updated with tile floors, walls, and bathtub surround. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/4/18, 11:37 AM Subject Comp 1 72 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 300 Grove Place , Edina, MN 55343 MLS Number: 4154771 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/4/18, 10:46 AM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 15 Indicated before and after benefit: $15,179 Percentage of after sale price: 4.17% Subject is from the Interlachen Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2013. Original levied assessment amount of $10,161. The buyer assumed the outstanding balance reported at $9,106, which was added to the subject sale price. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $257,500 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $51,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $40,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 5 2 1.00 5 2 1.00 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1040 1040 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient ItemsGarage/Carport Porch/Patio/DeckFireplace(s)Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$91,000 Adjusted Sale Price $348,500 Average Average 2 2AverageAverage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage None None FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 259 sf finished, FR, bath, den, average 259 sf finished, FR, bath, den, average Average Average 1160 1160 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1950 1950 Above average, recent remodeling included kitchen, dining room wall removal Average 1-story rambler 1-story ramblerAverage to above average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2013 0.36 0.36 Public, poor street None apparent 5/31/16 6/22/12 Interlachen Park Neighborhood Interlachen Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records $313.52 $221.98 Edina Edina Same street SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1300 Grove Place 300 Grove Place $363,679 Resale Set 15 300 Grove Place , Edina, MN 55343 MLS Number: 4695236 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/4/18, 10:47 AM Subject Comp 1 73GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 309 John Street , Edina, MN 55343 MLS Number: 4021117 Terrific 5 BR family home situated on a beautiful wooded lot Renovated kitchen opens onto spacious main floor family room Main floor great room with expansive windows overlooking private backyard Second view of family room - informal dining area at other end Formal dining room Living room with fireplace , built-ins and coved ceilings NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 2 8/4/18, 10:52 AM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 16 Indicated before and after benefit: $14,747 Percentage of after sale price: 2.23% Subject is from the Interlachen Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2013. Original levied assessment amount of $10,097; buyer assumed $9,447 outstanding balance. Some adjustment is merited due to most recent sale disclosing some water has gotten into the basement. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $630,000Price/GLAData Source Verification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $38,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition ($20,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 5 2 1.00 5 2 1.00Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1040 1040 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s)Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$18,000 Adjusted Sale Price $648,000 Average Average 2 2AverageAverage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage None None FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 259 sf finished, FR, bath, den, average 259 sf finished, FR, bath, den, average Average Average 1160 1160 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1950 1950 Above average, some water in bsmt disclosed Above average 2-story 2-story Average to above average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Generally level, many trees Generally level, many Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2013 0.36 0.36 Public, poor street None apparent 6/30/17 7/1/11 Interlachen Park Neighborhood Interlachen Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records $571.33 $543.10 Edina Edina Same street SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1309 John Street 309 John Street $662,747 Resale Set 16 309 John Street , Edina, MN 55343 MLS Number: 4826973 Charming 2-story colonial on a huge lot (105x175).Front entryway Formal living room with fireplace Formal living room Kitchen with spacious center island Newer kitchen NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/4/18, 10:53 AM Subject Comp 1 74 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 6433 Sherwood Avenue , Edina, MN 55435 MLS Number: 3991879 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/3/18, 3:34 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 17 Indicated before and after benefit: $20,250 Percentage of after sale price: 5.45% Subject is from the Lake Cornelia Neighborhood, having new streets in 2013. Original levied assessment amount of $13,610; buyer assumed balance of approx $12,500. Some adjustment is merited due to im- provements made to the home between the 2 sales, as well as the first sale having been lender-owned FEATURE Address Proximity to Subject Sale Price $215,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale $32,250 Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $54,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $50,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 8 4 1.75 5 2 1.00Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1200 1200 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient ItemsGarage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site ImprovementsOther Net Adjustment (Total)$136,250 Adjusted Sale Price $351,250 Average Average 1 1 Average Average Tuck-under 2-car garage Tuck-under 2-car garage Deck Deck FA/AC FA/AC Average Average Unfinished Unfinished Average Average 2156 2156 sf, walkout sf, walkout 1953 1953 Above average, recent remodeling included wood flooring, landscaping, new washer, fireplace gas insert, kitchen remodeling Average 3-level split 3-level split Average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2013 0.36 0.36 Public, poor street None apparent 5/3/16 5/10/11 Lake Cornelia Neighborhood Lake Cornelia Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Lender-owned DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records $172.31 $99.72 Edina EdinaSame street SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 6433 Sherwood Ave 6433 Sherwood Ave $371,500 Resale Set 17 6433 Sherwood Avenue , Edina, MN 55435 MLS Number: 4683623 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/3/18, 3:36 PM Subject Comp 1 75GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4949 Poppy Lane , Edina, MN 55435 MLS Number: 4085524 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 2 of 2 8/3/18, 2:47 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 18 Indicated before and after benefit: $12,500 Percentage of after sale price: 2.04% Subject is from the Lake Edina Neighborhood, having new streets in 2013. The buyer assumed assessments - original pending assessments were $12,500, and levied as-sessments were $7,013; $7,000 was added to the price (any additional adjustment for assessments would result in a higher benefit indication). Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATURE Address Proximity to SubjectSale Price $574,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $12,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $15,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 8 4 2.50 8 4 2.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1094 1094 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/DeckFireplace(s) Extras Site ImprovementsOther Net Adjustment (Total)$27,000 Adjusted Sale Price $601,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 4949 Poppy Ln 4949 Poppy Ln $613,500 $284.29 $265.99 Edina EdinaSame street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records 7/18/14 6/15/12 Lake Edina Neighborhood Lake Edina Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2013 0.36 0.36 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-storyAbove average Above average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 2158 2158 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1984 1984 Good, some recent updates Good FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 843 finished sf, FR, BR, bath, above average 843 finished sf, FR, BR, bath, above average Average Average 1 1 Gazebo, hot tub Gazebo, hot tub Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Deck Deck Average Average Resale Set 18 4949 Poppy Lane , Edina, MN 55435 MLS Number: 4464326 Classic colonial home completely renovated to todays styles, colors and finishes. The living room features 2 deep double hung windows to the front, a beautiful bay window to the south The dining room is great size and wonderful for casual or formal entertaining. The main floor Family room has a very open feel to it and features a gas fireplace flanked by a wall of built-in bookcases and cabinets NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/3/18, 2:50 PM Subject Comp 1 76 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4224 Scott Terrace , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 3965270 MOrningside Cottage NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/3/18, 4:40 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 19 Indicated before and after benefit: $51,970 Percentage of after sale price: 11.01% Subject is from the Morningside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original levied assessment amount of $6,930; seller paid it off. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATURE Address Proximity to SubjectSale Price $290,030 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $85,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $45,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.75 6 3 1.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 780 780 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$130,000Adjusted Sale Price $420,030 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 4224 Scott Terrace 4224 Scott Terrace $472,000 $414.04 $254.41 Edina EdinaSame street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 4/4/18 1/13/11 Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Some sloping, good trees Some sloping, good trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2014 0.17 0.17 Public, poor street None apparent 1.5-story 1.5-story Average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 1140 1140 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1937 1937 Above average, recent remodeling included kitchen Above average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 520 finished sf, FR, average 520 finished sf, FR, average Average Average 1 1 Average Average Detached 2-car garage Detached 2-car garage 3-season porch 3-season porch Average Average Resale Set 19 4224 Scott Terrace , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4906434 Cozy 3 bed/2 bath in Morningside Living Room with Fireplace Formal dining room with original woodwork and architectural touches Modern Kitchen, remodeled in 2015 Quartz countertops NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/3/18, 4:41 PM Subject Comp 1 77GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4245 Scott Terrace , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4199439 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/3/18, 4:45 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 20 Indicated before and after benefit: $4,600 Percentage of after sale price: 0.78% Subject is from the Morningside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original pending assessment amount of $7,500 at the time of sale. The buyer assumed the outstanding balance, which was added to the subject sale price. Some adjustment is merited due to improve- ments made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $559,900 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing TermsConditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $22,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $5,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 7 3 2.00 7 3 2.00Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1200 1200 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site ImprovementsOtherNet Adjustment (Total)$27,000 Adjusted Sale Price $586,900 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #14245 Scott Terrace 4245 Scott Terrace $591,500 $308.72 $292.22 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records MLS, public records 11/11/14 12/17/12 Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market termsArm's length Arm's length Mostly level and open Mostly level and open Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2014 0.23 0.23 Public, poor street None apparent 1.5-story 1.5-story Average Average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 1916 1916 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1922 1922 Above average, new roof after storm Above average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 593 finished sf, FR, den, above average 593 finished sf, FR, den, above average Average Average 0 0 Average Average Detached 2-car garage Detached 2-car garage Deck Deck Average Average Resale Set 20 4245 Scott Terrace , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4530333 Welcome to Edina Morningside. A quite, family friendly neighborhood offering walkability to parks, Lake Harriet and several options for shopping and dining. A community of homes located on larger lots than most other neighborhoods in East Edina. Your heart will skip a beat when you step inside this beautiful home. An amazing combination of restored original charm and conveniences found only is newer homes. The stylish, neutral decor is amazing with careful attention to all the details. Refinished wood floors ,recessed lighting in the smooth ceilings, combination of painted and natural woodwork and new bay windows. The Formal Dining Room is open to the Living Room which will give you several options when entertaining. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/3/18, 4:45 PM Subject Comp 1 78 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 6224 Chowen Avenue S , Edina, MN 55410 MLS Number: 4376840 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/14/18, 11:01 AM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 21 Indicated before and after benefit: $100 Percentage of after sale price: 0.02% Subject is from the Strachauer Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2016. Original pending assessment amount of $12,200 at time of sale. The buyer assumed the outstanding balance, which was added to the subject sale price. Some adjustment is merited due to improve- ments made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $391,000 Price/GLA Data SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $60,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $30,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 6 3 1.00 6 3 1.00 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1364 1364 $0 Basement Finishing Functional Utility Heating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site ImprovementsOther Net Adjustment (Total)$90,000 Adjusted Sale Price $481,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #16224 Chowen Ave 6224 Chowen Ave $481,100 $309.99 $251.93 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 6/9/17 8/21/13 Strachauer Park Neighborhood Strachauer Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Lender-owned Some sloping, good trees Some sloping, good trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2016 0.32 0.32 Public, poor street None apparent 1-story rambler 1-story rambler Above average Above average None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 1552 1552 sf, lookout sf, lookout 1959 1959 Above average, recent improvements included kitchen, bath, and bedroom remodel Above average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 950 finished sf, FR, BR, bath, above average 950 finished sf, FR, BR, bath, above average Average Average 2 2 Average Average Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage 3-season porch, patio 3-season porch, patio Average Average Resale Set 21 6224 Chowen Avenue S , Edina, MN 55410 MLS Number: 4818467 Subject Comp 1 79GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4081 Sunnyside Road , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4365469 All Redone don't miss seeing Dinning Room Dinning Room Living Room Living Room Kitchen NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/30/18, 12:12 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 22 Indicated before and after benefit: $27,000 Percentage of after sale price: 2.63% Subject is from the White Oaks Neighborhood, having new streets in 2016. Original levied assessment amount of $24,859, which has been paid off by the seller. The subject is an active listing, therefore the sale price has been adjusted downward. Location listed as a selling point, yet new streets are not specifically mentioned. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $950,000 Price/GLA Data SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $48,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 7 3 2.50 7 3 2.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1806 1806 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements OtherNet Adjustment (Total)$48,000Adjusted Sale Price $998,000 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #14081 Sunnyside Rd 4081 Sunnyside Rd $1,025,000 $334.20 $309.75 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 7/26/18 7/16/13 White Oaks Neighborhood White Oaks Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms $1,099,000 active listing Arm's length Much sloping, good trees Much sloping, good trees Pond/wetland views Pond/wetland views Public, new street in 2016 0.61 0.61 Public, poor streetNone apparent 2-story 2-storyGoodGood None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 3067 3067 sf, WO sf, WO 1987 1987 Good Good FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverage 1,927 finished sf, FR, 2 BRs, rec room, bath, good 1,927 finished sf, FR, 2 BRs, rec room, bath, good Average Average 4 4 Good Good Attached 3-car garage Attached 3-car garage Deck Deck Average Average Resale Set 22 4081 Sunnyside Road , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4985269 4081 Sunnyside Road Two Story entry foyer Formal dining with corner hutches & hardwood floor Formal living room with floor to ceiling windows, fireplace, and built-ins. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 7 8/30/18, 12:09 PM Subject Comp 1 80 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5408 Valley Lane , Edina, MN 55439 MLS Number: 4158365 SIDE VIEW/GARAGE OFF LIMERICK DRIVE LIVING ROOM W/BAY WINDOW AND UPDATED PAINT. RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 23 Indicated before and after benefit: -$6,040 Percentage of after sale price: -1.35% Subject is from the Normandale Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2018. Original pending assessment amount of $7,460 - buy-er assumed, which was added to the subject sale price. Some adjust- ment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATURE Address Proximity to SubjectSale Price $362,500 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $81,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $10,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 9 4 2.50 9 4 2.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0Basement Area 1164 1164 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s) Extras Site ImprovementsOther Net Adjustment (Total)$91,000 Adjusted Sale Price $453,500 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 5408 Valley Ln 5408 Valley Ln $447,460 $218.70 $177.17 Edina EdinaSame street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 2/20/18 8/17/12 Normandale Park Neighborhood Normandale Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new front street in 2018 (old side street) 0.30 0.30 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-storyAverageAverage None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 2046 2046sf, below grade sf, below grade 1968 1968Above average, recent improvements kitchen countertops, bath vanity tops, interior doors Average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average Unfinished Unfinished Average Average 1 1 Average Average Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Patio Patio Average Average Resale Set 23 5408 Valley Lane , Edina, MN 55439 MLS Number: 4900303 Subject Comp 1 81GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 6411 Limerick Drive , Edina, MN 55439 MLS Number: 4551332 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/30/18, 2:52 PM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 24 Indicated before and after benefit: $21,170 Percentage of after sale price: 4.71% Subject is from the Normandale Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2018. Original pending assessment amount of $14,920 - buyer assumed, which was added to the subject sale price. Some ad- justment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $363,750Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $35,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $30,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 9 4 2.50 9 4 2.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 860 860 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/DeckFireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$65,000 Adjusted Sale Price $428,750 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #16411 Limerick Dr 6411 Limerick Dr $449,920$229.55 $185.59 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records 8/10/18 6/1/15 Normandale Park Neighborhood Normandale Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms $475,000 active listing + pending assessment Arm's length Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2018 0.34 0.34 Public, poor streetNone apparent 2-story 2-storyAverageAverage None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 1960 1960 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1968 1968 Above average, recent improvements included kitchen countertop, master bath, some flooring Average FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 350 sf finished, FR, average 350 sf finished, FR, average Average Average 0 0 Average Average Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Deck Deck Average Average Resale Set 24 6411 Limerick Drive , Edina, MN 55439 MLS Number: 4991243 Great Edina Neighborhood Large Back Yard Renovated Kitchen Main level Family Room NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/30/18, 2:53 PM Subject Comp 1 82 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5000 Bruce Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4530714 This charming 2Story Home is nestled on a beautifully landscaped lot with wonderful shade trees and just steps away from 50th & France! The Kitchen has been updated with beautiful custom cabinetry with pullout shelves, granite countertops, stainless steel appliances, and has a Walkin Pantry! The Living Room features a hardwood floor, stunning wood burning fireplace, a new energyefficient center bay window, and new custom window treatments! (Both in 2010) Laying between the Living Room and Kitchen is the Dining Room with new window treatments (2010) and French doors that lead to the Sunroom! RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 25 Indicated before and after benefit: $66,750 Percentage of after sale price: 9.27% Subject is from the Arden Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original levied assessment amount of $12,582, which have been paid off. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $611,250Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing TermsConditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $12,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $15,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 9 4 1.75 9 4 1.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 725 725 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck $15,000Fireplace(s) Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$42,000 Adjusted Sale Price $653,250 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #15000 Bruce Ave S 5000 Bruce Ave S $720,000$303.41 $257.59 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records 5/25/17 5/28/15 Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market termsArm's length Arm's length Level, some trees Level, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2015 0.26 0.26 Public, poor street None apparent 2-story 2-story Good Good None apparent Side traffic on 50th St Side traffic on 50th St 2373 2373 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1940 1940 Good, recent improvements included modest décor items Good FA, in-floor heating/AC FA, in-floor heating/AC Good Good 371 sf finished, modest, no bath 371 sf finished, modest, no bath Average Average 2 2 Good Good Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Upgraded patio elements Patio Average Average Resale Set 25 5000 Bruce Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4796825 Subject Comp 1 83GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5113 Indianola Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 3860383 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 9/7/18, 11:38 AM RESALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Resale Set 26 Indicated before and after benefit: $23,000 Percentage of after sale price: 3.08% Subject is from the Arden Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Buyer assumed special assessments - original pending amount of $14,400, levied amount of $12,704; price adjusted at $13,000. Some adjustment is merited due to improvements made to the home between the 2 sales. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price $609,900 Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $33,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built Condition $75,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 7 4 2.00 7 4 2.00 Gross Living Area (GLA)$0 Basement Area 1222 1222 $0 Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $7,000 Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s)Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$115,000 Adjusted Sale Price $724,900 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #15113 Indianola Ave 5113 Indianola Ave $747,900 $372.65 $303.89 Edina Edina Same street DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records 6/8/15 1/20/10 Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Level, some trees Level, some treesAverage residential Average residential Public, new street in 2015 0.19 0.19 Public, poor street None apparent 1.5-story 1.5-story Good Good None apparent Quiet street Quiet street 2007 2007 sf, below grade sf, below grade 1940 1940 Good, 2011 improvements included remodeled kitchen, DR & siding Good FA/AC FA/AC Average Average 443 sf finished, modest, no bath 443 sf finished, modest, no bath Average Average 1 1AverageAverage Det 2-car garage (2011 addn)Detached 1-car garage Patio Patio Average Average Resale Set 26 5113 Indianola Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4576258 Subject Comp 1 84 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 85GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Overview In this section of the report are the detailed adjustment analysis of paired sales in Edina. When valuing the contribution of a specific item to the overall property value, a paired sales analysis often is used. Paired sales generally find a property with and without a specific item such as a porch, 3rd garage stall or basement finishing. Ideally, very similar comparables are found from the same neighborhood which sold during similar market conditions. A total of 21 subject properties with new streets have been used for detailed study. They have been compared to similar comps from the same neighborhood having older streets. After adjusting for differences (market conditions, differences in ame- nities, lot size, quality of improvements, degree or remodeling, GLA, basement finishing, etc.), the price variation is an indication of the street benefit. All reported sale prices are adjusted downward for any seller concessions reported, and upward for any special assessment balance assumed by the buyer. Market conditions adjusted based upon conclusions from a prior section. All 21 properties used for detailed paired sales study indicated positive value benefit. Following are summary tables and charts. While there are some market irregularities/anomalies, the majority indicate a typi- cal benefit of $10,000 to $30,000. Market value benefit is supported. The average and median bene-fit indications are summarized to the right - shown is summary data from all properties, plus from excluding extreme indications (negative amounts, and those above $40,000). Following are summary tables of the resales sets, scattergram charts of the indicated benefits, and the detailed adjustment grids. The following general conclusions have been made: n Measurable market value benefit is supported n Benefit as a percentage of total value is low, yet the dollar amount is significant n Scattergrams with computer-generated trend lines indicate increasing benefit as lot size increases n Greater benefit is possible for higher-priced properties n While the benefit as a percentage of total value decreases as property values increase, the dollar benefit amount is sig- nificant for high-priced properties. For example, a 2.0% ben-efit on a $1,500,000 property results in a benefit amount of $30,000 PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS Summary Table Average Median New Street Sale Price $928,118 $668,280 Lot Size 0.27 acres 0.25 acres Indicated Value Benefit - all properties $25,514 $22,000 % Value Benefit - all properties 3.35%2.82% Indicated Value Benefit - net of extremes $20,538 $21,050 % Value Benefit - net of extremes 3.02%2.64% 86 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Set Address Sale Price - New Street Lot Size Value Benefit Percentage of Total Neighborhood 1 5321 Halifax Ave S $1,335,000 0.26 $25,000 1.87%Arden Park 2 5101 Halifax Ave S $1,210,000 0.20 $10,000 0.83%Arden Park 3 5229 Halifax Ave S $1,335,000 0.28 $17,820 1.33%Arden Park 4 5217 61st St W $450,000 0.24 $22,000 4.89%Birchrest 5 5126 Roberts Pl $401,300 0.27 $11,300 2.82%Birchrest 6 6012 Birchrest Dr $377,500 0.23 $27,500 7.28%Birchrest 7 5121 Valley View Rd $490,500 0.25 $20,500 4.18%Birchrest 8 6001 Code Ave $491,352 0.25 $30,352 6.18%Birchrest 9 5221 Maddox Ln $514,700 0.49 $16,700 3.24%Birchrest 10 5325 62nd St W $542,100 0.23 $42,100 7.77%Birchrest 11 5721 Fairfax Ave $668,280 0.23 $28,280 4.23%Golf Terrace Heights 12 4629 56th St W $1,663,822 0.19 $25,222 1.52%Golf Terrace Heights 13 4614 Lakeview Dr $1,847,000 0.37 $25,100 1.36%Golf Terrace Heights 14 4300 Eton Pl $600,866 0.15 $15,866 2.64%Morningside 15 4219 Scott Terrace $390,000 0.23 $10,000 2.56%Morningside 16 3909 Morningside Rd $1,119,000 0.15 $19,000 1.70%Morningside 17 4001 Morningside Rd $1,530,000 0.15 $25,000 1.63%Morningside 18 4004 42nd St W $443,450 0.25 $18,450 4.16%Morningside 19 4214 Scott Terrace $1,106,600 0.46 $21,600 1.95%Morningside 20 4707 Townes Rd $1,349,000 0.48 $49,000 3.63%White Oaks 21 4708 Townes Rd $1,625,000 0.39 $75,000 4.62%White Oaks Average $928,118 0.27 $25,514 3.35% Median $668,280 0.25 $22,000 2.82% Extremes (neg & >$40k)Average w/o Extremes $887,465 0.26 $20,538 3.02% Median w/o Extremes $634,573 0.25 $21,050 2.60% Summary of Resale Value Benefit Indications 87GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 88 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 1 Indicated before and after benefit: $25,000 Percentage of after sale price: 1.87% Subject is from the Arden Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Buyer assumed special assessments - original $14,400 pending amount, and $9,978 levied; price adjusted at $10,000. Similar reliance has been placed on all the comparables; an old street value of $1,310,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $25,000. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$1,130,000 $1,306,490 $1,349,900Price/GLA Data SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $40,000 $34,000 $36,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction $60,000 ($50,000)($40,000)Year Built $4,500 $3,000 ($10,500) ConditionAbove Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 9 4 3.50 9 4 2.50 $10,000 9 4 2.50 $10,000 8 4 3.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$3,600 $4,400 $11,900Basement Area 1880 2332 ($9,000)1741 $7,800 1723 $3,100 Basement Finishing $45,000 $20,000 ($50,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $4,000 $4,000 ($3,000) Porch/Patio/Deck $10,000 ($20,000)$10,000 Fireplace(s)($2,000) Extras ($10,000)Site Improvements $10,000 $10,000 OtherNet Adjustment (Total)$148,100 $11,200 ($32,500) Adjusted Sale Price $1,278,100 $1,317,690 $1,317,400 COMPARABLE SALE #7 5321 Halifax Ave S 5028 Juanita Ave 5021 Indianola Ave 5101 Halifax Ave S SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 Edina Edina Edina Edina2 blocks N $1,335,000 3 blocks NW 3 blocks NW $362.08 $310.78 $360.51 $383.82 Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, inspection, MLSMLS, public records DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Arm's length3/6/17 9/5/13 7/31/14 7/31/14Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood0.26 0.22 ($20,000) 0.26 Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, mostly open 0.20 Public, poor street Quiet street Average residential, backs up to church & apts Average residential Average residential, adjacent to condos Average residential, adjacent to condos None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparentPublic, new street in 2015 Public, poor street Public, poor street 2-story 2-story 2-story 2-story Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street More upgrades2007200420052014 Luxury Fewer upgrades More upgrades Good Good Good New construction 3687 3636 3624 3517sf, below grade 1600 sf finished, FR, in-law suite, BR w/egress, 1.5 baths, good 1000 sf finished, FR, exercise, egress, 3/4- bath, average 1466 sf finished, FR, exercise, BR w/egress, bath, good 1723 sf finished, FR, 1 BR, bath, exercise room, athletic court, very good sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade Average Average Average AverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Good Attached 2+1-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 3-car garage Average Average Average Front covered porch, patio Patio Small deck, quality screen porch, patio Patio 1 1 2 1 GoodGoodGoodAverageAverageGoodGoodElevator Paired Sales Set 1 5028 Juanita Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4382835 5321 Halifax Avenue S , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4747378 5101 Halifax Avenue S , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4473259 Welcome to 5101 Halifax Ave Beautiful Great Room features interesting ceiling details Stunning Kitchen features Butlers Pantry, Custom cabinetry, and ceiling details Unique Island Design and 2 Dishwashers Spacious Master Bath Walkin Tiled Shower with Spa Bench 5021 Indianola Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4480543 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 89GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 2 Indicated before and after benefit: $10,000 Percentage of after sale price: 0.83% Subject is from the Arden Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original levied assessment amount of $12,704; seller had paid it off. Comp #1 is the best comparison and has been relied upon most heavily; an old street value of $1,200,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $10,000. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$1,130,000 $1,306,490 $1,349,900Price/GLA Data SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $49,000 $45,000 $46,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction ($100,000)($100,000)Year Built $12,000 $10,500 ($3,000) ConditionAbove Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 10 4 3.50 9 4 2.50 $10,000 9 4 2.50 $10,000 8 4 3.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)($4,600)($3,800)$3,700Basement Area 1497 2332 ($9,000)1741 $100 1723 ($9,500) Basement Finishing $10,000 ($5,000)($75,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $7,500 $7,500 Porch/Patio/Deck ($30,000) Fireplace(s)($2,000) Extras ($10,000)Site Improvements ($10,000) OtherNet Adjustment (Total)$64,900 ($97,700)($157,800) Adjusted Sale Price $1,194,900 $1,208,790 $1,192,100 Edina Edina Edina Edina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #7 5105 Halifax Ave S 5028 Juanita Ave 5021 Indianola Ave 5101 Halifax Ave S 3 blocks NW 3 blocks NW 2 blocks N $1,210,000$338.94 $310.78 $360.51 $383.82 Public data, MLS,Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, inspection, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records, broker DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length12/18/17 9/5/13 7/31/14 7/31/14 Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood0.20 0.22 0.26 ($20,000) 0.20 ($20,000) Quiet street Generally level, mostly open Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, mostly open Average residential Average residential Average residential, adjacent to condos Average residential, adjacent to condosPublic, new street in 2015 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor streetNone apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street 2-story 2-story 2-story 2-storyGoodGoodMore upgrades More upgrades2012200420052014GoodGoodGoodNew construction 3570 3636 3624 3517sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade 1362 sf finished, FR, 1 BR, bath, good 1000 sf finished, FR, exercise, egress, 3/4- bath, average 1466 sf finished, FR, exercise, BR w/egress, bath, good 1723 sf finished, FR, 1 BR, bath, exercise room, athletic court, very goodAverageAverageAverageAverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Average Average Average Good Attached 3-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 3-car garage Patio Patio Small deck, quality screen porch, patio Patio 1 1 2 1 Good Good Elevator GoodAverageGoodAverageAverage Paired Sales Set 2 5028 Juanita Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4382835 5105 Halifax Avenue S , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4821782 5101 Halifax Avenue S , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4473259 Welcome to 5101 Halifax Ave Beautiful Great Room features interesting ceiling details Stunning Kitchen features Butlers Pantry, Custom cabinetry, and ceiling details Unique Island Design and 2 Dishwashers Spacious Master Bath Walkin Tiled Shower with Spa Bench 5021 Indianola Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4480543 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 90 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 3 Indicated before and after benefit: $17,820 Percentage of after sale price: 1.33% Subject is from the Arden Park Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Buyer assumed special assessments - reported at $17,820. Comp #1 is the best comparison and has been relied upon most heavily; an old street value of $1,100,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $17,820. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$1,130,000 $1,306,490 $1,349,900Price/GLA Data SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $40,000 $34,000 $36,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction $60,000 ($50,000)($40,000)Year Built $4,500 $3,000 ($10,500) ConditionAbove Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 9 4 3.50 9 4 2.50 $10,000 9 4 2.50 $10,000 8 4 3.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$3,600 $4,400 $11,900Basement Area 1880 2332 ($9,000)1741 $7,800 1723 $3,100 Basement Finishing $45,000 $20,000 ($50,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $4,000 $4,000 ($3,000) Porch/Patio/Deck $10,000 ($20,000)$10,000 Fireplace(s)($2,000) Extras ($10,000)Site Improvements $10,000 $10,000 OtherNet Adjustment (Total)$148,100 $11,200 ($32,500) Adjusted Sale Price $1,278,100 $1,317,690 $1,317,400 COMPARABLE SALE #7 5321 Halifax Ave S 5028 Juanita Ave 5021 Indianola Ave 5101 Halifax Ave S SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 Edina Edina Edina Edina2 blocks N $1,335,000 3 blocks NW 3 blocks NW $362.08 $310.78 $360.51 $383.82 Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, inspection, MLSMLS, public records DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Arm's length3/6/17 9/5/13 7/31/14 7/31/14Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood Arden Park Neighborhood0.26 0.22 ($20,000) 0.26 Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, mostly open 0.20 Public, poor street Quiet street Average residential, backs up to church & apts Average residential Average residential, adjacent to condos Average residential, adjacent to condos None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparentPublic, new street in 2015 Public, poor street Public, poor street 2-story 2-story 2-story 2-story Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street More upgrades2007200420052014 Luxury Fewer upgrades More upgrades Good Good Good New construction 3687 3636 3624 3517sf, below grade 1600 sf finished, FR, in-law suite, BR w/egress, 1.5 baths, good 1000 sf finished, FR, exercise, egress, 3/4- bath, average 1466 sf finished, FR, exercise, BR w/egress, bath, good 1723 sf finished, FR, 1 BR, bath, exercise room, athletic court, very good sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade Average Average Average AverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Good Attached 2+1-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 3-car garage Average Average Average Front covered porch, patio Patio Small deck, quality screen porch, patio Patio 1 1 2 1 GoodGoodGoodAverageAverageGoodGoodElevator Paired Sales Set 3 5028 Juanita Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4382835 5229 Halifax Avenue S , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4652635 Living Room with amazing southern exposure Living Room with custom builtins and gas fireplace Dining Room Kitchen, informal dining and great room Kitchen 5101 Halifax Avenue S , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4473259 Welcome to 5101 Halifax Ave Beautiful Great Room features interesting ceiling details Stunning Kitchen features Butlers Pantry, Custom cabinetry, and ceiling details Unique Island Design and 2 Dishwashers Spacious Master Bath Walkin Tiled Shower with Spa Bench 5021 Indianola Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4480543 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 91GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 92 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 4 Indicated before and after benefit: $22,000 Percentage of after sale price: 4.89% Subject is from the Birchcrest Neighborhood, having new streets in 2017. Buyer to be responsible for special assessments - original pending amount of $17,200, which was added to the subject sale price. Similar reliance has been placed on all the comparables; an old street value of $428,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $22,000. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$410,000 $415,000 $417,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $47,000 $52,000 $42,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of ConstructionYear Built ($4,000)$0 ($1,000) Condition ($30,000)($20,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.50 7 3 1.75 ($5,000)7 3 1.00 $5,000 7 3 1.75 ($5,000) Gross Living Area (GLA)($5,100)$8,600 ($5,500)Basement Area 1504 1589 ($200)1144 $8,700 1595 ($300) Basement Finishing ($7,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($9,000) Porch/Patio/Deck ($2,500)($4,000)($3,000)Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements ($2,000)($2,500)($1,500) Other Net Adjustment (Total)$23,200 $30,800 $5,700Adjusted Sale Price $433,200 $445,800 $423,200 Average Fencing Fencing UG sprinkler system 2 2 2 Average Average Average Attached 2-car garage Attached 2+2-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage None Patio, gazebo Patio & 2014 shed Attached 2-car garage Deck2 Average FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Average Average Average 808 sf finished, FR, den, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 1300 sf finished, FR, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath (remodeled), average Average Average Average 720 sf finished, FR, 3/4- bath, average AverageFA/AC Average 1504 1589 1360sf, partial LO sf, below grade sf, below grade 1956 1960 1956AverageAverageMore updates Rambler Rambler RamblerAverageAverageAverage None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Slight east-west slope, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, open Average residential Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2017 0.24 0.24 $4,000 0.24 Public, poor street Public, poor streetNone apparent 0.26 Generally level, some trees Average residential 6/15/18 8/28/15 5/8/15 Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Market terms Arm's length12/18/15Birchcrest Neighborhood DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple Fee simple Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records Public data, MLSMLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONFee simple $299.20 $258.02 $305.15 Edina Edina Edina3.5 blocks SW 1 block S $261.76 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 5217 61st St W 6216 Wyman Ave 5225 Birchcrest Dr $450,000 COMPARABLE SALE #3 6209 Hansen RdEdina3 blocks SW Public, poor streetNone apparent Quiet street Rambler Average1957More updates 1595sf, below grade Paired Sales Set 4 (comps 1-3) 6216 Wyman Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4626738 Stately Tudor-style home with 4 car tandem Garage in highly sought after Edina School District. Spacious Foyer with Slate tile flooring. Beautiful Living Room spotlights marble surround fireplace - with see through to main floor Family Room. Full wall Marble fireplace surround. 5217 61st Street W , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4927694 6209 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4660770 5225 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4568650 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 93GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$420,000 $483,000 $485,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $27,000 $49,000 $75,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction ($20,000)($20,000) Year Built ($1,000)$0 ($2,000)Condition ($40,000)($40,000)Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 6 3 1.50 7 3 1.75 ($5,000)7 3 1.75 ($5,000)8 3 1.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)($31,600)($7,300)($21,400)Basement Area 1504 2031 ($9,000)1420 $3,200 1860 ($15,600) Basement Finishing ($2,000)($25,000)($30,000) Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $6,000 Porch/Patio/Deck ($2,000)($4,000)Fireplace(s)$2,000 Extras Site Improvements ($2,500)Other Net Adjustment (Total)($15,600)($49,600)($56,000) Adjusted Sale Price $404,400 $433,400 $429,000 Average AverageAverage 2 1 Average Average Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage None Deck, patio TU 2-car garage None2 Average FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverage 808 sf finished, FR, den, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 1800 sf finished, FR, 2 BRs, 3/4-bath, quality finishing Average Average 846 sf finished, FR, BR, 3/4-bath, average AverageFA/ACAverage 1504 1860sf, partial LO sf, walkout 1956 1958AverageMore updates1957Average 2031sf, below grade 1956More updates 1625sf, below grade Rambler RamblerAverageGood None apparent Quiet street Quiet street RamblerGood Slight east-west slope, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2017 0.24 0.25 Public, poor streetNone apparent 6/15/18 8/26/14 Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Market terms Arm's length11/4/16Birchcrest Neighborhood DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLSMLS, public records, broker MLS, public recordsPublic data, MLSMLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONFee simple $299.20 $260.75 Edina Edina 2 blocks SW $206.79 Edina 1 block SW $297.23 SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #6 5217 61st St W 6112 Tingdale Ave $450,000 COMPARABLE SALE #4 5325 Birchcrest DrEdina 1 block SW COMPARABLE SALE #5 5305 Birchcrest Dr 0.23 Slight east-west slope, some trees Average residential Public, poor streetNone apparent Quiet street RamblerAverage Public data, MLSMLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONFee simpleMarket terms Arm's length12/7/15Birchcrest Neighborhood0.24 Generally level, some trees Average residential Public, poor streetNone apparent Quiet street 1250 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4- bath, new finishing AverageFA/ACAverage Attached 2-car garage Patio2 Average Fencing Paired Sales Set 4 (comps 4-6) 5325 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4734885 Welcome to 5325 Birchcrest Drive! Fantastic Edina location! 4 Bedroom, 3 bath home with 2 car garage. Swedish gas fireplace which looks through from Living room to Family room. Picture window with inviting lighting for the Living / Dining room. Plenty of room to extend your dining room table for entertaining. Granite kitchen with ample counter space. Eat-in Kitchen with views of landscaped back yard. 6012 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4610057 5305 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4585029 Comp 4 Comp 5 Comp 6 PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 94 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 5 Indicated before and after benefit: $11,300 Percentage of after sale price: 2.82% Subject is from the Birchcrest Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original levied assessment amount of $19,200. The buyer assumed the outstanding balance of approx $17,500, which was added to the subject sale price. Most reliance was placed on comps #1, 3, 6, and 7; an old street value of $390,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $11,300. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$410,000 $415,000 $417,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $32,000 $38,000 $28,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of ConstructionYear Built ($4,000)$0 ($1,000) Condition ($25,000)($55,000)($45,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 7 3 1.75 7 3 1.75 7 3 1.00 $9,000 7 3 1.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)($4,700)$7,900 ($5,000)Basement Area 1476 1589 ($2,300)1144 $6,600 1595 ($2,400) Basement Finishing ($7,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($9,000) Porch/Patio/Deck $500 ($1,000)Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements ($2,000)($2,500)($1,500) Other Net Adjustment (Total)($14,500)($8,000)($30,900)Adjusted Sale Price $395,500 $407,000 $386,600 5126 Roberts Pl 6216 Wyman Ave 5225 Birchcrest Dr 6209 Hansen Rd SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 Edina Edina Edina Edina $401,300 2 blocks W 3 blocks NW 4 blocks W Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS $266.82 $258.02 $305.15 $261.76 DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market termsFee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple 8/10/17 8/28/15 5/8/15 12/18/15Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 0.27 0.24 0.24 ($4,000) 0.26 ($4,000) Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Average residential Average residential Average residential Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, open Generally level, some trees Average residential Public, new street in 2015 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Quiet street None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Average Average Average Average Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Below average Average More updates More updates1956196019561957 sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade1504158913601595 Average Average Average Average 1133 sf finished, FR, game rm, den, office, 3/4-bath, below average 1300 sf finished, FR, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath (remodeled), average 720 sf finished, FR, 3/4- bath, average Average Average Average Average FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Deck Patio, gazebo Patio & 2014 shed Deck Attached 2-car garage Attached 2+2-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Average 2 2 2 2 Average Fencing Fencing UG sprinkler system Paired Sales Set 5 (comps 1-3) 6216 Wyman Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4626738 Stately Tudor-style home with 4 car tandem Garage in highly sought after Edina School District. Spacious Foyer with Slate tile flooring. Beautiful Living Room spotlights marble surround fireplace - with see through to main floor Family Room. Full wall Marble fireplace surround. 5126 Roberts Place , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4842995 A new front door is the entry to this overside hallway. Freshly painted living room has a large picture window that floods the room with natural light. Hardwood floors and a woodburning fireplace complete this spacious living area. What a great layout!The dining area adjoins the living area nd kitchen. 6209 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4660770 5225 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4568650 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 95GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$420,000 $393,650 $483,000 $485,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $13,000 $33,000 $33,000 $58,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction ($20,000)($20,000) Year Built ($1,000)($1,000)$0 ($2,000) Condition ($25,000)($65,000)($65,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 7 3 1.75 7 3 1.75 6 3 1.50 $5,000 7 3 1.75 8 3 1.50 $5,000 Gross Living Area (GLA)($29,000)$8,700 ($6,700)($19,600) Basement Area 1476 2031 ($11,100)1345 $2,600 1420 $1,100 1860 ($17,700) Basement Finishing ($2,000)$2,000 ($25,000)($30,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $6,000 Porch/Patio/Deck $3,000 ($10,000)$1,000 ($1,000) Fireplace(s)$2,000 Extras Site Improvements ($2,500) Other Net Adjustment (Total)($50,100)$16,300 ($88,100)($94,300) Adjusted Sale Price $369,900 $409,950 $394,900 $390,700 COMPARABLE SALE #75126 Roberts Pl 5325 Birchcrest Dr 5305 Birchcrest Dr 6112 Tingdale AveCOMPARABLE SALE #5SUBJECTCOMPARABLE SALE #4 COMPARABLE SALE #6 Edina Edina Edina Edina6012 Hansen Rd 3 blocks NE $401,300 4 blocks NW 3 blocks NW $260.75Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS $266.82 $206.79 $297.23 MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTION Fee simple Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleFee simple Market terms Arm's length 8/10/17 11/4/16 12/7/15 8/26/14 Arm's length Arm's length Arm's lengthArm's length 7/13/15 Birchcrest Neighborhood0.27 0.23 Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Average residential Public, poor street Public, poor street Average residential Average residential Generally level, some trees Slight east-west slope, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential ($4,000) 0.24 ($4,000) 0.25 ($4,000)Public, poor street None apparent Public, new street in 2015 Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street None apparent None apparent None apparent RamblerAverageAverageGoodGood Rambler Rambler RamblerRambler 1958Below average Average More updates More updates195619571956Below average 1860 sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, walkout 1504 2031 16251345 sf, below grade 1800 sf finished, FR, 2 BRs, 3/4-bath, quality finishing Average Average Average Average 1133 sf finished, FR, game rm, den, office, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, BR, 3/4-bath, average 1250 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4- bath, new finishing 677 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath, below average Average FA/AC Average Average Average Average FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACFA/AC Average Attached 2-car garage Deck None Patio Deck, patio Attached 2-car garage TU 2-car garage Attached 2-car garageAttached 2-car garage Breezeway & patio 1 Average Average Average Average 2 2 2 Average 2 AverageAverageAverageFencingAverage Birchcrest Neighborhood Edina5 blocks NW $292.68 Public data, MLSMLS, public records Average 1957 0.24 ($24,000) Generally level, some trees Pond & local park Public, poor street None apparent Quiet street Paired Sales Set 5 (comps 4-7) PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 6012 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4610057 5325 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4734885 Welcome to 5325 Birchcrest Drive! Fantastic Edina location! 4 Bedroom, 3 bath home with 2 car garage. Swedish gas fireplace which looks through from Living room to Family room. Picture window with inviting lighting for the Living / Dining room. Plenty of room to extend your dining room table for entertaining. Granite kitchen with ample counter space. Eat-in Kitchen with views of landscaped back yard. 6112 Tingdale Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4477799 Owner suite on main 5305 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4585029 Comp 4 Comp 5 Comp 6 Comp 7 96 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 6 Indicated before and after benefit: $27,500 Percentage of after sale price: 7.28% Subject is from the Birchcrest Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original pending assessment amount of $12,500 - buyer assumed, which was added to the subject sale price. Most reliance was placed on comps #1 and 3; an old street value of $350,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $27,500. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$410,000 $415,000 $417,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $1,000 $6,000 ($4,000) Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of ConstructionYear Built ($4,000)$0 ($1,000) Condition ($15,000)($45,000)($35,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($9,000)7 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($9,000) Gross Living Area (GLA)($14,800)($2,200)($15,100)Basement Area 1320 1589 ($5,400)1144 $3,500 1595 ($5,500) Basement Finishing ($3,000)($10,000)($3,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($9,000) Porch/Patio/Deck $500 ($1,000)Fireplace(s)($2,000)($2,000)($2,000) ExtrasSite Improvements ($2,000)($2,500)($1,500) Other Net Adjustment (Total)($58,700)($53,200)($76,100)Adjusted Sale Price $351,300 $361,800 $341,400 Average Fencing Fencing UG sprinkler systemAverageAverageAverageAverage 1 2 2 2DeckPatio, gazebo Patio & 2014 shed Deck Attached 2-car garage Attached 2+2-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Average FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverage 700 sf finished, FR, game rm, den, 3/4-bath, below average 1300 sf finished, FR, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath (remodeled), average 720 sf finished, FR, 3/4- bath, average sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade1320158913601595 Average to below average Average More updates More updates1956196019561957 Average Average Average Average Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Quiet street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Quiet street None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparentPublic, new street in 2015 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, open Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Average residential 0.23 0.24 $4,000 0.24 0.26 Average residential Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood 9/18/15 8/28/15 5/8/15 12/18/15Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market termsFee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS $285.98 $258.02 $305.15 $261.76$377,500 5 blocks SW 3 blocks SW 5 blocks SWEdinaEdinaEdinaEdina6012 Birchcrest Dr 6216 Wyman Ave 5225 Birchcrest Dr 6209 Hansen Rd SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 Paired Sales Set 6 (comps 1-3) 6216 Wyman Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4626738 Stately Tudor-style home with 4 car tandem Garage in highly sought after Edina School District. Spacious Foyer with Slate tile flooring. Beautiful Living Room spotlights marble surround fireplace - with see through to main floor Family Room. Full wall Marble fireplace surround. 6012 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4618372 Welcome home!Functional layout for busy family! Cozy living room with fireplace for the cold winters!Living room connects to formal dining for an open floor plan for entertaining! Separate formal dining off of kitchen ready for you and your new neighbors! Perfect size kitchen! 6209 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4660770 5225 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4568650 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 97GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$420,000 $393,650 $483,000 $485,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions ($19,000)$3,000 ($4,000)$21,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction ($20,000)($20,000) Year Built ($1,000)($1,000)$0 ($2,000) Condition ($15,000)$5,000 ($55,000)($55,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 6 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($9,000)6 3 1.50 ($4,000)7 3 1.75 ($9,000)8 3 1.50 ($4,000) Gross Living Area (GLA)($39,100)($1,400)($16,800)($29,700) Basement Area 1320 2031 ($14,200)1345 ($500)1420 ($2,000)1860 ($20,800) Basement Finishing ($5,000)($1,000)($28,000)($33,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $6,000 Porch/Patio/Deck $3,000 ($10,000)$1,000 ($1,000) Fireplace(s)($2,000)($2,000)($2,000) Extras Site Improvements ($2,500) Other Net Adjustment (Total)($95,300)($31,900)($138,300)($144,500) Adjusted Sale Price $324,700 $361,750 $344,700 $340,500 Average Average Average Average Average Fencing Average Average Average Average 1 2 2 2 1 Deck None Breezeway & patio Patio Deck, patio Average Average Attached 2-car garage TU 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Attached 2-car garage FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverageAverage sf, below grade sf, walkout 700 sf finished, FR, game rm, den, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, BR, 3/4-bath, average 677 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath, below average 1250 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4- bath, new finishing sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade 1800 sf finished, FR, 2 BRs, 3/4-bath, quality finishing 1320 2031 1345 1625 1860 Average to below average Average Below average More updates More updates Good Good 1956 1957 1957 1956 Average Average Average 1958 Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street Pond & local park Average residential Average residential None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Public, new street in 2015 Public, poor street Public, poor street Generally level, some trees Slight east-west slope, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees 0.24 ($20,000) 0.24 0.25 Public, poor street Public, poor street Quiet street Quiet street Average residential 0.23 0.23 Average residential Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Arm's length Arm's length 9/18/15 11/4/16 7/13/15 12/7/15 Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 8/26/14 Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Market terms Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records DESCRIPTION Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS $285.98 $206.79 $292.68 $297.23 $260.75 3 blocks SW 1.5 blocks SE $377,500 4 blocks SW 4 blocks WEdinaEdinaEdina Edina Edina COMPARABLE SALE #6 COMPARABLE SALE #76012 Birchcrest Dr 5325 Birchcrest Dr 6012 Hansen Rd 5305 Birchcrest Dr 6112 Tingdale AveSUBJECTCOMPARABLE SALE #4 COMPARABLE SALE #5 Paired Sales Set 6 (comps 4-7) PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 6012 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4610057 5325 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4734885 Welcome to 5325 Birchcrest Drive! Fantastic Edina location! 4 Bedroom, 3 bath home with 2 car garage. Swedish gas fireplace which looks through from Living room to Family room. Picture window with inviting lighting for the Living / Dining room. Plenty of room to extend your dining room table for entertaining. Granite kitchen with ample counter space. Eat-in Kitchen with views of landscaped back yard. 6112 Tingdale Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4477799 Owner suite on main 5305 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4585029 Comp 4 Comp 5 Comp 6 Comp 7 98 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 7 Indicated before and after benefit: $20,500 Percentage of after sale price: 4.18% Subject is from the Birchcrest Neighborhood, having new streets in 2015. Original pending assessment amount of $12,500 - buyer assumed, which was added to the subject sale price. Most reliance was placed on comps #1, 3, 5, 6 and 7; an old street value of $470,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $20,500. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$410,000 $415,000 $417,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $12,000 $18,000 $7,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction $5,000 $5,000 $5,000Year Built ($2,000)$2,000 $1,000 Condition $10,000 ($20,000)($10,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.75 7 3 1.75 7 3 1.00 $10,000 7 3 1.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)$18,400 $33,300 $18,000Basement Area 1872 1589 $5,700 1144 $14,600 1595 $5,500 Basement Finishing $20,000 $18,000 $25,000 Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($9,000) Porch/Patio/Deck ($1,000)Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements ($2,000)($2,500)($1,500) Other Net Adjustment (Total)$62,100 $77,400 $50,000Adjusted Sale Price $472,100 $492,400 $467,500 5121 Valley View Rd 6216 Wyman Ave 5225 Birchcrest Dr 6209 Hansen Rd SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 Edina Edina Edina Edina $490,500 3.5 blocks SW 2 blocks NW 4 blocks W Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS $262.02 $258.02 $305.15 $261.76 DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market termsFee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple 5/25/16 8/28/15 5/8/15 12/18/15Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 0.25 0.24 $4,000 0.24 0.26 Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, open Generally level, some trees Average residential Public, new street in 2015 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street Average residential Average residential Average residential Quiet street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Quiet street None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Above average Average Average Average Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Above average Average More updates More updates1958196019561957 sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade1872158913601595 Average Average Average Average 1308 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4-bath, 2015 remodeling 1300 sf finished, FR, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath (remodeled), average 720 sf finished, FR, 3/4- bath, average Average Average Average Average FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Large patio w/ fence Patio, gazebo Patio & 2014 shed Deck Attached 2-car garage Attached 2+2-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Average 2 2 2 2 Average Fencing Fencing UG sprinkler system Paired Sales Set 7 (comps 1-3) 6216 Wyman Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4626738 Stately Tudor-style home with 4 car tandem Garage in highly sought after Edina School District. Spacious Foyer with Slate tile flooring. Beautiful Living Room spotlights marble surround fireplace - with see through to main floor Family Room. Full wall Marble fireplace surround. 5121 Valley View Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4693216 Welcome home to this wonderful Edina Rambler with over 3000 finished square feet. Light and bright living room with hardwood floors and wood burning fireplace. Formal dining room with hardwood floors adjacent to living room. Perfect for entertaining! Generous sized kitchen. Lots of options here! Another view of kitchen from informal dining area.Master Bedroom suite with hardwood floors. 6209 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4660770 5225 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4568650 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 99GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$420,000 $456,400 $483,000 $485,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions ($8,000)$2,000 $9,000 $34,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction $5,000 ($15,000)($15,000)Year Built $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 $0Condition$10,000 ($15,000)($30,000)($30,000)Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.75 7 3 1.75 6 3 1.75 7 3 1.75 8 3 1.50 $5,000Gross Living Area (GLA)($10,300)$13,700 $16,100 $800Basement Area 1872 2031 ($3,200)1662 $4,200 1420 $9,000 1860 ($9,800) Basement Finishing $23,000 $10,000 ($5,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $6,000 Porch/Patio/Deck $3,000 ($1,000)$1,000 ($1,000) Fireplace(s)$2,000 Extras Site Improvements ($2,500)($2,500) Other Net Adjustment (Total)$26,500 $15,400 ($10,400)($19,000) Adjusted Sale Price $446,500 $471,800 $472,600 $466,000 COMPARABLE SALE #75121 Valley View Rd 5325 Birchcrest Dr 5305 Birchcrest Dr 6112 Tingdale AveSUBJECTCOMPARABLE SALE #4 COMPARABLE SALE #6COMPARABLE SALE #55229 Maddox LaEdinaEdina Edina EdinaEdina1.5 blocks N $490,500 4 blocks NW 3 blocks NW3 blocks SW $260.75Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS$262.02 $206.79 $297.23$274.61Public data, MLS MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public recordsMLS, public recordsDESCRIPTION Fee simple Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleFee simple Market terms Arm's length 5/25/16 11/4/16 12/7/15 8/26/14 Arm's length Arm's length Arm's lengthArm's length 4/15/16 Birchcrest Neighborhood0.25 0.23 Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest NeighborhoodBirchcrest Neighborhood0.32 $2,000 Generally level, some trees Average residential Public, poor street None apparent Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Generally level, some trees Slight east-west slope, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential 0.24 0.25 Public, poor street None apparent Public, new street in 2015 Public, poor street Public, poor street Average residential Average residential Average residential Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street None apparent None apparent None apparent RamblerAbove average Average Good GoodRamblerRamblerRamblerRamblerAbove average 1958Above average Average More updates More updates1958195719561956More updates 1860sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, walkout1872203116251662sf, below grade 1800 sf finished, FR, 2 BRs, 3/4-bath, quality finishing Average Average Average Average 1308 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4-bath, 2015 remodeling 846 sf finished, FR, BR, 3/4-bath, average 1250 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4-bath, new finishing 966 sf finished, FR, office, 1/2-bath (remodeled), above avg Average FA/AC Average Average Average Average FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACFA/AC Average Attached 2-car garage Large patio w/ fence None Patio Deck, patio Attached 2-car garage TU 2-car garage Attached 2-car garageAttached 2-car garage Large patio & shed 1 Average Average Average Average 2 2 22 Average AverageAverageAverageFencingFencing Paired Sales Set 7 (comps 4-7) PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 5229 Maddox Lane , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4688050 Sensational freshly updated rambler in the Birchcrest neighborhood in the Countryside school district. Welcoming foyer opens to the spacious great room featuring hardwood floors, recessed lighting and a wood burning fireplace. Open foyer The dining room is great for entertaining and has 2 beautiful display shelves. The amazing center island kitchen features charming grey enameled countertops with under cabinet lighting 5325 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4734885 Welcome to 5325 Birchcrest Drive! Fantastic Edina location! 4 Bedroom, 3 bath home with 2 car garage. Swedish gas fireplace which looks through from Living room to Family room. Picture window with inviting lighting for the Living / Dining room. Plenty of room to extend your dining room table for entertaining. Granite kitchen with ample counter space. Eat-in Kitchen with views of landscaped back yard. 6112 Tingdale Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4477799 Owner suite on main 5305 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4585029 Comp 4 Comp 5 Comp 6 Comp 7 100 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 8 Indicated before and after benefit: $30,352 Percentage of after sale price: 6.18% Subject is from the Birchcrest Neighborhood, having new streets in 2017. Original pending assessment amount of $11,352 - buyer assumed, which was added to the subject sale price. Most reliance was placed on comps #1, 3, 5, 6 and 7; an old street value of $461,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $30,352. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$410,000 $415,000 $417,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $35,000 $40,000 $32,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction $5,000 $5,000 $5,000Year Built ($5,000)($1,000)($2,000) Condition $50,000 $20,000 $30,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($10,000)7 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($10,000) Gross Living Area (GLA)($22,400)($7,500)($22,800)Basement Area 1244 1589 ($6,900)1144 $2,000 1595 ($7,000) Basement Finishing $10,000 $8,000 $15,000 Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($9,000) Porch/Patio/Deck ($1,000)Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements $500 $500 Other Net Adjustment (Total)$50,700 $66,000 $40,700Adjusted Sale Price $460,700 $481,000 $458,200 6001 Code Ave 6216 Wyman Ave 5225 Birchcrest Dr 6209 Hansen Rd SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 Edina Edina Edina Edina $491,352 5.5 blocks SW 3 blocks SW 5 blocks SW $394.98 $258.02 $305.15 $261.76Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms 6/28/18 8/28/15 5/8/15 12/18/15Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood0.25 0.24 $4,000 0.24 0.26 Average residential Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, open Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Average residential None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparentPublic, new street in 2017 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Quiet street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Quiet street 1955 1960 1956 1957 Above average Average Average Average Above average to good Average Above average Fewer updates 1244 1589 1360 1595 910 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, some updates 1300 sf finished, FR, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath (remodeled), average 720 sf finished, FR, 3/4- bath, average sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade Average Average Average AverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Attached 2-car garage Attached 2+2-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Average Patio & shed Patio, gazebo Patio & 2014 shed Deck2222 Fencing Fencing Fencing UG sprinkler systemAverageAverageAverageAverage Paired Sales Set 8 (comps 1-3) 6216 Wyman Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4626738 Stately Tudor-style home with 4 car tandem Garage in highly sought after Edina School District. Spacious Foyer with Slate tile flooring. Beautiful Living Room spotlights marble surround fireplace - with see through to main floor Family Room. Full wall Marble fireplace surround. 6001 Code Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4958050 Newly installed concrete drive Fabulous kitchen Quartz counter tops! Breakfast area(can be turned/moved), handy door to the rear yard Enjoy your meals/conversations here! 6209 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4660770 5225 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4568650 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 101GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$420,000 $456,400 $483,000 $485,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $21,000 $31,000 $38,000 $57,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction $5,000 ($15,000)($15,000)Year Built ($2,000)($1,000)($1,000)($3,000)Condition $50,000 $25,000 $10,000 $10,000Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($10,000)6 3 1.75 ($10,000)7 3 1.75 ($10,000)8 3 1.50 ($5,000)Gross Living Area (GLA)($51,200)($27,200)($24,800)($40,000)Basement Area 1244 2031 ($15,700)1662 ($8,400)1420 ($3,500)1860 ($22,300) Basement Finishing $13,000 ($10,000)($15,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $6,000 Porch/Patio/Deck $3,000 ($1,000)$1,000 ($1,000) Fireplace(s)$2,000 Extras Site Improvements $2,000 $500 $500 Other Net Adjustment (Total)$21,100 $10,900 ($14,800)($32,300) Adjusted Sale Price $441,100 $467,300 $468,200 $452,700 COMPARABLE SALE #6 COMPARABLE SALE #76001 Code Ave 5325 Birchcrest Dr 5229 Maddox La 5305 Birchcrest Dr 6112 Tingdale AveSUBJECTCOMPARABLE SALE #4 COMPARABLE SALE #5 Edina Edina Edina Edina Edina3.5 blocks SW 2 blocks SE $491,352 4 blocks SW 5 blocks SW $394.98 $206.79 $274.61 $297.23 $260.75Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Market terms Arm's length Arm's length 6/28/18 11/4/16 4/15/16 12/7/15 Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 8/26/14 Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood0.25 0.23 Average residential Generally level, some trees Slight east-west slope, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees 0.32 $2,000 0.24 0.25 Public, poor street Public, poor street Quiet street Quiet street Average residential Average residential Average residential Average residential None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Public, new street in 2017 Public, poor street Public, poor street Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Good Good1955195719561956 Above average Average Above average 1958Above average to good Average Fewer updates Fewer updates Fewer updates 1244 2031 1662 1625 1860sf, below grade sf, walkout 910 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, some updates 846 sf finished, FR, BR, 3/4-bath, average 966 sf finished, FR, office, 1/2-bath (remodeled), above avg 1250 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4-bath, new finishing sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade 1800 sf finished, FR, 2 BRs, 3/4-bath, quality finishing Average Average Average Average AverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Average Average Attached 2-car garage TU 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Attached 2-car garage Patio & shed None Large patio & shed Patio Deck, patio 2 2 2 2 1 Average Average Fencing Average Fencing Fencing Average Average Average Average Paired Sales Set 8 (comps 4-7) PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 5229 Maddox Lane , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4688050 Sensational freshly updated rambler in the Birchcrest neighborhood in the Countryside school district. Welcoming foyer opens to the spacious great room featuring hardwood floors, recessed lighting and a wood burning fireplace. Open foyer The dining room is great for entertaining and has 2 beautiful display shelves. The amazing center island kitchen features charming grey enameled countertops with under cabinet lighting 5325 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4734885 Welcome to 5325 Birchcrest Drive! Fantastic Edina location! 4 Bedroom, 3 bath home with 2 car garage. Swedish gas fireplace which looks through from Living room to Family room. Picture window with inviting lighting for the Living / Dining room. Plenty of room to extend your dining room table for entertaining. Granite kitchen with ample counter space. Eat-in Kitchen with views of landscaped back yard. 6112 Tingdale Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4477799 Owner suite on main 5305 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4585029 Comp 4 Comp 5 Comp 6 Comp 7 102 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 9 Indicated before and after benefit: $16,700 Percentage of after sale price: 3.24% Subject is from the Birchcrest Neighborhood, having new streets in 2017. Original pending assessment amount of $17,200. The buyer assumed the outstanding balance, which was added to the subject sale price. Most reliance was placed on comps #1, 3, 5, 6 and 7; an old street value of $498,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $16,700. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$410,000 $415,000 $417,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $12,000 $15,000 $10,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction $5,000 $5,000 $5,000Year Built ($4,000)$0 ($1,000) Condition $25,000 ($5,000)$5,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.75 + .50 7 3 1.75 $4,000 7 3 1.00 $14,000 7 3 1.75 $4,000 Gross Living Area (GLA)$19,400 $34,300 $19,000Basement Area 1888 1589 $6,000 1144 $14,900 1595 $5,900 Basement Finishing $10,000 $8,000 $15,000 Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($9,000) Porch/Patio/Deck ($1,000)Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements $1,000 $1,500 $1,500 Other Net Adjustment (Total)$89,400 $102,700 $80,400Adjusted Sale Price $499,400 $517,700 $497,900 Privacy fencing Fencing Fencing UG sprinkler systemAverageAverageAverageAverage 2 2 2 2Quality patio Patio, gazebo Patio & 2014 shed Deck Attached 2-car garage Attached 2+2-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Average FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverage 1000 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4-bath, average 1300 sf finished, FR, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath (remodeled), average 720 sf finished, FR, 3/4- bath, average sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade1888158913601595 Above average to good Average More updates Fewer updates1956196019561957 Above average Average Average Average Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Quiet street None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparentPublic, new street in 2017 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, open Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Average residential 0.49 0.24 $20,000 0.24 $16,000 0.26 $16,000Average residential Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood 2/16/17 8/28/15 5/8/15 12/18/15Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market termsFee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS $272.62 $258.02 $305.15 $261.76$514,700 3.5 blocks SW 2 blocks NW 4 blocks WEdinaEdinaEdinaEdina5221 Maddox La 6216 Wyman Ave 5225 Birchcrest Dr 6209 Hansen Rd SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 Paired Sales Set 9 (comps 1-3) 6216 Wyman Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4626738 Stately Tudor-style home with 4 car tandem Garage in highly sought after Edina School District. Spacious Foyer with Slate tile flooring. Beautiful Living Room spotlights marble surround fireplace - with see through to main floor Family Room. Full wall Marble fireplace surround. 5221 Maddox Lane , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4783520 6209 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4660770 5225 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4568650 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 103GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$420,000 $456,400 $483,000 $485,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $2,000 $8,000 $12,000 $24,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction $5,000 ($15,000)($15,000)Year Built ($1,000)$0 $0 ($2,000)Condition $25,000 ($15,000)($15,000)Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.75 + .50 7 3 1.75 $4,000 6 3 1.75 $4,000 7 3 1.75 $4,000 8 3 1.50 $9,000Gross Living Area (GLA)($9,300)$14,700 $17,100 $1,800Basement Area 1888 2031 ($2,900)1662 $4,500 1420 $9,400 1860 ($9,400) Basement Finishing $13,000 ($10,000)($15,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $6,000 Porch/Patio/Deck $3,000 ($1,000)$1,000 ($1,000) Fireplace(s)$2,000 Extras Site Improvements $3,000 $1,500 $1,500 $1,000 Other Net Adjustment (Total)$63,800 $45,700 $21,000 ($3,600) Adjusted Sale Price $483,800 $502,100 $504,000 $481,400 Average Average Privacy fencing Average Fencing Fencing Average Average Average Average 2 2 2 2 1 Quality patio None Large patio & shed Patio Deck, patio Average Average Attached 2-car garage TU 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Attached 2-car garage FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverageAverage sf, below grade sf, walkout 1000 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4-bath, average 846 sf finished, FR, BR, 3/4-bath, average 966 sf finished, FR, office, 1/2-bath (remodeled), above avg 1250 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4-bath, new finishing sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade 1800 sf finished, FR, 2 BRs, 3/4-bath, quality finishing 1888 2031 1662 1625 1860 Above average to good Average Above average to good More updates More updates Good Good1956195719561956 Above average Average Above average 1958 Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Average residential Average residential Average residential None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Public, new street in 2017 Public, poor street Public, poor street Generally level, some trees Slight east-west slope, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees 0.32 $14,000 0.24 $16,000 0.25 $16,000Public, poor street Public, poor street Quiet street Quiet street Average residential 0.49 0.23 $16,000Average residential Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Arm's length Arm's length 2/16/17 11/4/16 4/15/16 12/7/15 Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 8/26/14 Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Market terms Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records DESCRIPTION Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS$272.62 $206.79 $274.61 $297.23 $260.75 3 blocks NW 1.5 blocks N $514,700 4 blocks NW 3 blocks SWEdinaEdinaEdina Edina Edina COMPARABLE SALE #6 COMPARABLE SALE #75221 Maddox La 5325 Birchcrest Dr 5229 Maddox La 5305 Birchcrest Dr 6112 Tingdale AveSUBJECTCOMPARABLE SALE #4 COMPARABLE SALE #5 Paired Sales Set 9 (comps 4-7) PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 5229 Maddox Lane , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4688050 Sensational freshly updated rambler in the Birchcrest neighborhood in the Countryside school district. Welcoming foyer opens to the spacious great room featuring hardwood floors, recessed lighting and a wood burning fireplace. Open foyer The dining room is great for entertaining and has 2 beautiful display shelves. The amazing center island kitchen features charming grey enameled countertops with under cabinet lighting 5325 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4734885 Welcome to 5325 Birchcrest Drive! Fantastic Edina location! 4 Bedroom, 3 bath home with 2 car garage. Swedish gas fireplace which looks through from Living room to Family room. Picture window with inviting lighting for the Living / Dining room. Plenty of room to extend your dining room table for entertaining. Granite kitchen with ample counter space. Eat-in Kitchen with views of landscaped back yard. 6112 Tingdale Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4477799 Owner suite on main 5305 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4585029 Comp 4 Comp 5 Comp 6 Comp 7 104 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 10 Indicated before and after benefit: $42,100 Percentage of after sale price: 7.77% Subject is from the Birchcrest Neighborhood, having new streets in 2017. Original pending assessment amount of $17,200. The buyer assumed the outstanding balance, which was added to the subject sale price. Most reliance was placed on comps #1, 3, 5, 6 and 7; an old street value of $500,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $42,100. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$410,000 $415,000 $417,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $16,000 $19,000 $14,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction $20,000 $20,000 $20,000Year Built ($4,000)$0 ($1,000) Condition $60,000 $30,000 $40,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($10,000)7 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($10,000) Gross Living Area (GLA)($16,700)($1,800)($17,100)Basement Area 1480 1589 $2,800 1144 $11,700 1595 $2,700 Basement Finishing $15,000 $13,000 $20,000 Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($8,000)$1,000 $1,000 Porch/Patio/Deck $3,000 $2,000 $3,000Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements $5,000 $4,500 $5,500 Other Net Adjustment (Total)$87,100 $115,400 $78,100Adjusted Sale Price $497,100 $530,400 $495,600 Good upgrades Fencing Fencing UG sprinkler systemAverageAverageAverageAverage 2 2 2 2Quality patio Patio, gazebo Patio & 2014 shed Deck Attached 2-car garage, heated Attached 2+2-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Average FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverage 1400 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, den, 3/4-bath, average 1300 sf finished, FR, office, workshop, 3/4-bath, below average 846 sf finished, FR, den, 3/4-bath (remodeled), average 720 sf finished, FR, 3/4- bath, average sf, side WO sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade1332158913601595 Good Average Above average Above average1956196019561957 Upgrades Average Average Average Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Quiet street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Quiet street Quiet street None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparentPublic, new street in 2017 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street Some sloping, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, open Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Average residential 0.23 0.24 $4,000 0.24 $16,000 0.26 Average residential Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood 8/7/17 8/28/15 5/8/15 12/18/15Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market termsFee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS $406.98 $258.02 $305.15 $261.76$542,100 3.5 blocks SW 2 blocks NW 4 blocks WEdinaEdinaEdinaEdina5325 62nd St W 6216 Wyman Ave 5225 Birchcrest Dr 6209 Hansen Rd SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 Paired Sales Set 10 (comps 1-3) 6216 Wyman Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4626738 Stately Tudor-style home with 4 car tandem Garage in highly sought after Edina School District. Spacious Foyer with Slate tile flooring. Beautiful Living Room spotlights marble surround fireplace - with see through to main floor Family Room. Full wall Marble fireplace surround. 5325 W 62nd Street , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4837291 Come home to this beautifully finished four bedroom two bath home nestled on an immaculately kept private lot in the award winning Edina schools! You will immediately appreciate the tremendous amount of detail and pride of ownership this home exudes! Only the finest things were used at every turn! The kitchen is the heart of the home and this homes got a great heart! The wrap around granite counters with bar stools offers great seating for family and friends as you prepare the evenings fare! The banquette with custom granite table is a great place for a quick bite or to relax with your morning coffee! 6209 Hansen Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4660770 5225 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4568650 Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 105GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$420,000 $456,400 $483,000 $485,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $6,000 $12,000 $16,000 $29,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction $20,000 $15,000Year Built ($1,000)$0 $0 ($2,000)Condition $60,000 $45,000 $20,000 $20,000Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 6 3 1.00 7 3 1.75 ($10,000)6 3 1.75 ($10,000)7 3 1.75 ($10,000)8 3 1.50 $5,000Gross Living Area (GLA)($45,400)($21,500)($19,000)($34,300)Basement Area 1480 2031 ($6,000)1662 $1,400 1420 $6,200 1860 ($12,600) Basement Finishing $18,000 $5,000 ($5,000)($10,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $7,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 Porch/Patio/Deck $6,000 $2,000 $4,000 $2,000 Fireplace(s)$2,000 Extras Site Improvements $7,000 $4,500 $4,500 $7,000 Other Net Adjustment (Total)$61,600 $56,400 $17,700 $7,100 Adjusted Sale Price $481,600 $512,800 $500,700 $492,100 Average Average Good upgrades Average Fencing Fencing Average Average Average Average 2 2 2 2 1 Quality patio None Large patio & shed Patio Deck, patio Average Average Attached 2-car garage, heated TU 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Average Average Average Attached 2-car garage FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverageAverage sf, below grade sf, walkout 1400 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, den, 3/4-bath, average 846 sf finished, FR, BR, 3/4-bath, average 966 sf finished, FR, office, 1/2-bath (remodeled), above avg 1250 sf finished, FR, BR w/egress, 3/4-bath, new finishing sf, side WO sf, below grade sf, below grade 1800 sf finished, FR, 2 BRs, 3/4-bath, quality finishing 1332 2031 1662 1625 1860 Good Average Above average Above avg to good Above avg to good Good Good1956195719561956 Upgrades Average Above average 1958 Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Rambler Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street, near Hwy 62 Average residential Average residential Average residential None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Public, new street in 2017 Public, poor street Public, poor street Some sloping, some trees Slight east-west slope, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees 0.32 $2,000 0.24 0.25 Public, poor street Public, poor street Quiet street Quiet street Average residential 0.23 0.23 Average residential Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Birchcrest Neighborhood Arm's length Arm's length 8/7/17 11/4/16 4/15/16 12/7/15 Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 8/26/14 Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Market terms Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records DESCRIPTION Public data, MLS, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS$406.98 $206.79 $274.61 $297.23 $260.75 3 blocks NW 1.5 blocks N $542,100 4 blocks NW 3 blocks SWEdinaEdinaEdina Edina Edina COMPARABLE SALE #6 COMPARABLE SALE #75325 62nd St W 5325 Birchcrest Dr 5229 Maddox La 5305 Birchcrest Dr 6112 Tingdale AveSUBJECTCOMPARABLE SALE #4 COMPARABLE SALE #5 Paired Sales Set 10 (comps 4-7) PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) 5229 Maddox Lane , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4688050 Sensational freshly updated rambler in the Birchcrest neighborhood in the Countryside school district. Welcoming foyer opens to the spacious great room featuring hardwood floors, recessed lighting and a wood burning fireplace. Open foyer The dining room is great for entertaining and has 2 beautiful display shelves. The amazing center island kitchen features charming grey enameled countertops with under cabinet lighting 5325 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4734885 Welcome to 5325 Birchcrest Drive! Fantastic Edina location! 4 Bedroom, 3 bath home with 2 car garage. Swedish gas fireplace which looks through from Living room to Family room. Picture window with inviting lighting for the Living / Dining room. Plenty of room to extend your dining room table for entertaining. Granite kitchen with ample counter space. Eat-in Kitchen with views of landscaped back yard. 6112 Tingdale Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4477799 Owner suite on main 5305 Birchcrest Drive , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4585029 Comp 4 Comp 5 Comp 6 Comp 7 106 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4509 Lakeview Drive , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4534024 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/28/18, 10:46 AM PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 11 Indicated before and after benefit: $28,280 Percentage of after sale price: 4.23% Subject is from the Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood, having new streets in 2016. Original levied assessment amount of $13,338, paid by the seller. More reliance has been placed on comp #1; an old street value of $640,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $28,280. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$515,000 $805,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $9,000 $20,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction $50,000 ($50,000) Year Built $1,000 $6,000 Condition $50,000 ($50,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 6 3 1.75 6 3 1.50 $5,000 7 2 1.75Gross Living Area (GLA)$8,800 ($34,300)Basement Area 1630 1615 ($9,700)1800 ($3,400) Basement Finishing $10,000 Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($3,000) Porch/Patio/DeckFireplace(s)($2,000)Extras Site ImprovementsOther $0Net Adjustment (Total)$124,100 ($146,700) Adjusted Sale Price $639,100 $658,300 Average Average Average 2 2 3AverageAverageAverage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage, oversized Deck & shed Newer paver patio Patio FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverage 1250 sf finished, FR, 2 BRs, bath, good 1400 sf finished, FR, BR, den, game room, bath, above average 1300 sf finished, FR, game room, 2 BRs, bath, good Average Average Average 1750 1615 2278sf, below grade sf, WO sf, below grade 1956 1955 1950 Above average Average to above average Good 1-story rambler 1-story rambler 1-story rambler Good Average to above average Good to very good Generally level, some trees Some sloping and trees Some sloping and trees Average residential Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2016 Public, poor street Public, poor streetNone apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood0.23 0.21 0.31 ($30,000) Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 5/30/17 10/2/15 12/1/14 Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION $381.87 $318.89 $353.38Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Same street 5 blocks N $668,280 Edina Edina Edina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #25721 Fairfax Ave 5717 Fairfax 4509 Lakeview Dr Paired Sales Set 11 5717 Fairfax Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4637093 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/28/18, 10:39 AM 5721 Fairfax Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4812837 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/27/18, 4:00 PM Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 107GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4608 W 56th Street , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4466691 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/28/18, 11:47 AM 4629 W 56th Street , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4676388 This picture is of a home previously built by REFINED.This picture is of a home previously built by REFINED. This picture is of a home previously built by REFINED.This picture is of a home previously built by REFINED. This picture is of a home previously built by REFINED.This picture is of a home previously built by REFINED. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/27/18, 3:17 PM Subject Comp 1 PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 12 Indicated before and after benefit: $25,222 Percentage of after sale price: 1.52% Subject is from the Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood, having new streets in 2016. Buyer was responsible for special assessments - $13,447 levied, original pending amount was $15,783, price adjusted at $14,000. An old street value of $1,638,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $25,222. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$1,625,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing TermsConditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $45,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built $3,000 Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 7 4 3.50 8 4 3.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$6,200 Basement Area 1422 1400 $400 Basement Finishing ($3,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck ($10,000)Fireplace(s)$2,000 Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$13,600 Adjusted Sale Price $1,638,600 Average Average Good Good 2 1Patio, front covered porch Glazed porch, deck Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Good Good FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverage 1000 sf finished, FR, exercise room, BR, bath, good 1126 sf finished, FR, game room, 2 BRs, bath, good sf, below grade sf, below grade 3000 2912 New construction New construction 2016 2014 Luxury Luxury 2-story 2-story None apparent None apparent Generally level, some trees Some sloping and trees 0.19 0.19 ($30,000) Public, new street in 2016 Public, poor street Average residential Average residential, small pond Quiet street Quiet street Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood 5/16/17 8/22/14Arm's length Arm's lengthCash equivalent Market termsFee simple Fee simpleDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records MLS, public records Public data, MLS Public data, MLS$554.61 $558.04$1,663,822 Same street Edina Edina 4629 56th St W 4608 56th St W SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 Paired Sales Set 12 108 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4608 W 56th Street , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4466691 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/28/18, 11:47 AM 4614 Lakeview Drive , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4471975 Fantastic curb appeal Main floor den or office Formal dining w/ built-ins Gourmet kitchen Center island and work area Butler's pantry area NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/28/18, 11:31 AM Subject Comp 1 PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 13 Indicated before and after benefit: $25,100 Percentage of after sale price: 1.36% Subject is from the Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood, having new streets in 2011. Original levied assessment amount of $12,500; buyer as-sumed a balance of near $11,000. An old street value of $1,821,900 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $25,100. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$1,625,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing TermsConditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions ($2,000) Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction Year Built ($7,500) Condition Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 9 4 4.50 8 4 3.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$137,900 Basement Area 2348 1400 $19,000 Basement Finishing $15,000 Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items $15,000 Garage/Carport $7,500 Porch/Patio/Deck ($10,000)Fireplace(s)$2,000 Extras Site Improvements Other Net Adjustment (Total)$196,900 Adjusted Sale Price $1,821,900 Average Average Good Good 2 1Patio, front covered porch Glazed porch, deck Attached 3-car garage Attached 2-car garage Geothermal system Good FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverage 1646 sf finished, FR, exercise, BR, bath, good 1126 sf finished, FR, game room, 2 BRs, bath, good sf, below grade sf, below grade 4750 2912 Very good New construction 2009 2014 Luxury Luxury 2-story 2-story None apparent None apparent Generally level, some trees Some sloping and trees 0.37 0.19 $20,000 Public, new street in 2011 Public, poor street Average residential Average residential, small pond Quiet street Quiet street Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood Golf Terrace Heights Neighborhood 7/7/14 8/22/14Arm's length Arm's lengthCash equivalent Market termsFee simple Fee simpleDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION MLS, public records MLS, public records Public data, MLS Public data, MLS$388.84 $558.04$1,847,000 Same street Edina Edina 4614 Lakeview Dr 4608 56th St W SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #2 Paired Sales Set 13 109GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 14 Indicated before and after benefit: $15,866 Percentage of after sale price: 2.64% Subject is from the Morningside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original levied assessment amount of $6,930, paid off by seller. Simi-lar reliance has been placed on all the comparables; an old street value of $585,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $15,866. Paired Sales Set 14 FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$628,000 $544,000 $658,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions ($17,000)($11,000)($1,000) Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style)Quality of Construction ($15,000)$20,000 ($55,000) Year Built ($5,500)($5,000)($8,000)Condition ($35,000)($35,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 9 4 1.75 9 4 2.00 9 5 2.50 ($5,000)8 3 1.75 Gross Living Area (GLA)$34,100 $14,900 $30,400Basement Area 1694 1160 $10,700 1015 $13,600 1176 $5,400 Basement Finishing $5,000 ($5,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling ($1,000)($1,000)($1,000)Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($10,000) Porch/Patio/Deck $5,000 ($2,000)$2,000Fireplace(s)$2,000ExtrasSite ImprovementsOther $0Net Adjustment (Total)($33,700)$29,500 ($65,200)Adjusted Sale Price $594,300 $573,500 $592,800 Average Average Average Average 2 2 2 1AverageAverageAverageAverage Attached 2-car garage 2014 detached 2+2-car garage (tandem)Attached 2-car garage Detached 2-car garage Screen porch-detached Patio 3-season porch Deck FA & HW/partial AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverage 554 sf finished, FR, den, bath, above average 465 sf finished, FR, play room, above average 582 sf finished, FR, average 858 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, above average Average Average Average Average 2491 1967 2262 2024sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, LO 1931 1942 1941 1947Above average Good Above average Good 1.5-story 1.5-story 1.5-story 1.5-storyAbove average Good Above average Good None apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2014 0.15 0.15 0.16 0.17 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor streetNone apparent 6/17/16 10/26/17 6/30/17 7/11/16 Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records $241.21 $319.27 $240.50 $325.10 Edina Edina Edina Edina5 blocks NW 2 blocks NW 3 blocks W SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 4300 Eton Place 4005 Lynn Ave 4201 Grimes Ave S 4310 Morningside Rd $600,866 4005 Lynn Avenue , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4872317 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 1:12 PM 4303 Eton Place , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4912464 Front of home Backyard with garage and long driveway Right corner of backyard - walkout lower level Left corner of backyard Screened Front Porch Kitchen Bright and cheery NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 8:21 AM 4310 Morningside Road , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4718380 Charming Morningside Cape Cod in Edina Schools. Beautifully updated and meticulously maintained. Inviting formal living room with coved ceilings, archways, walls of windows, hardwood floors and fireplace. Freshly painted throughout. Dining room is open to the beautiful kitchen, living room and door to main floor sunroom/four season porch. Breakfast bar eat-in and dining space. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 12:16 PM 4201 Grimes Avenue S , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4813659 Front Backyard Living Room Lviving Room Informal Dining Room Kitchen to Informal Living Room NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/21/18, 11:46 AM Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 110 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4024 Kipling Avenue , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4677435 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/17/18, 1:14 PM PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 15 Indicated before and after benefit: $10,000 Percentage of after sale price: 2.56% Subject is from the Morningside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original levied assessment amount of $6,930, paid off by seller. More reliance has been placed on comp #1; an old street value of $380,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $10,000. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$425,000 $381,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $27,000 $23,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction ($10,000)($10,000) Year Built ($6,500)($4,500) Condition ($20,000)($25,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 7 3 1.00 5 2 1.00 4 2 1.00Gross Living Area (GLA)$18,000 $21,900Basement Area 1100 1184 ($11,700)1113 ($300) Basement Finishing ($25,000)($15,000) Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($10,000)($10,000) Porch/Patio/Deck ($2,000)$2,000Fireplace(s)Extras Site Improvements Other $0Net Adjustment (Total)($40,200)($17,900)Adjusted Sale Price $384,800 $363,600 Edina Edina Edina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 4219 Scott Terrace 4225 Lynn Ave 4024 Kipling Ave 4 blocks W 4 block NW $390,000$257.94 $358.95 $342.77Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 8/10/17 1/15/16 2/26/16 Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood0.23 0.23 0.16 Some sloping, good trees Some sloping and trees Some sloping and trees Average residential Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2014 Public, poor street Public, poor street None apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street 1-story rambler 1-story rambler 1-story ramblerAverage, modest family room addition Average Average 1951 1964 1960Below avg-needs work, remodeled kitchen Average to below average Average 1512 1184 1113sf, below grade sf, walkout sf, below grade 362 sf finished, FR, bath, very modest Fully finished, FR, 2 BRs, bath, average 800 sf finished, FR, BR, average Average Average AverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Average Average Average 1-car attached garage - modest Detached 2-car garage Detached 2-car garage 2 decks Decking and patio Patio222AverageAverageAverage Average Average Average Paired Sales Set 15 4225 Lynn Avenue , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4649643 Welcome to 4225 Lynn Avenue located in the desirable Morningside Neighborhood. Located amongst multi million dollar homes. Fabulous open floor concept floor plan. This is the main hub for this fabulous mid century home.Huge retro Kitchen with top of the line stainless steel appliances. The pull knobs on the cabinetry are original. Retro staircase leads to lower level. Open floor concept.Owner's bedroom suite NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/17/18, 12:36 PM 4219 Scott Terrace , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4820274 Location! Location! Location! Fabulous Edina Morningside neighborhood near 50th & France and Excelsior & Grand. Opportunity knocks! Bring your contractors and clients with a vision. Good candidate for a partial renovation or complete tear down. Set on a mature tree lined street with friendly sidewalks that make walking and biking to all the local parks, lakes, shops and restaurants so easy and safe. This home welcomes affordable housing in a prime neighborhood with some work needed. The garage interior measures 21 x 12 leaving generous space for a vehicle and additional storage. The driveway and curved staircase are both concrete. This rooftop deck welcomes you to this great home. Conservative from the curb, this home will surprise you. With a little TLC it offers affordable living in a highly sought after community. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 5 8/17/18, 8:40 AM Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 111GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 16 Indicated before and after benefit: $19,000 Percentage of after sale price: 1.70% Subject is from the Morningside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original levied assessment amount of $6,930, paid off by seller. Similar reliance has been placed on all the comparables; an old street value of $1,100,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $19,000. Paired Sales Set 16 FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$1,095,000 $1,128,000 $1,228,500Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $18,000 ($5,000)($2,000) Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction $50,000 ($35,000) Year Built $0 $10,500 $3,000Condition($10,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 8 4 3.50 7 4 3.50 9 4 2.50 $10,000 7 4 2.50 $10,000Gross Living Area (GLA)($5,500)($68,600)($5,300) Basement Area 1104 1156 ($1,000)1568 ($9,300)1261 ($13,100) Basement Finishing Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 Porch/Patio/Deck ($15,000)($5,000) Fireplace(s)Extras Site ImprovementsOther $0 Net Adjustment (Total)$4,500 ($39,400)($129,400)Adjusted Sale Price $1,099,500 $1,088,600 $1,099,100 Good Good Good Good 2 2 2 2GoodGoodGoodGood Attached 2-car garage, oversized Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Detached 2-car garage Deck & open porch Covered patio w/ gas fplc Glazed porch & deck Covered porch, deck & covered patio FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverage 1104 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, good 999 sf finished, FR, BR, wet bar room, bath, good 1,104 sf finished, FR, BR, rec room, bath, good 1100 sf finished, FR, wet bar room, BR, bath, good Average Average Average Average 2763 2842 3743 2839 sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, WO 2015 2015 2008 2013Very good New construction Very good Very good 2-story 2-story 2-story 2-story Luxury, upgraded design Luxury, upgraded design Luxury, slightly inferior Luxury, slightly superior Some sloping and trees Generally level and open Some sloping and trees Good sloping and trees Average residential Average residential Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2014 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor streetNone apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood0.15 0.16 0.26 ($15,000) Double lot - 0.46 ($85,000) Quiet street Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length2/13/18 7/5/16 7/31/18 4/26/18 Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION $404.99 $385.29 $301.36 $432.72Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS 2 blocks W 5 blocks NW 3 blocks NW $1,119,000 Edina Edina Edina Edina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 3909 Morningside Rd 4208 Branson St 4100 Lynn Ave 4213 Grimes Ave S 4208 Branson Street , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4662299 Located in the Morningside neighborhood, this home is on a quiet street and has stunning curb appeal with the landscaping, stone facade and a paver sidewalk. Fenced backyard with outdoor gas fireplace Enjoy the outdoors in comfort with a built-in gas fireplace on the patio. With gorgeous stone surround and a beautiful back yard, it is perfect for entertaining or relaxing The stunning foyer and staircase was made to impress! Stained Alder & Metal railing, curved architecture, custom columns and windows to let in a wealth of sunlight NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 9:51 AM 3909 Morningside Road , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4898054 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/22/18, 2:19 PM 4213 Grimes Avenue S , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4910382 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 12:04 PM 4100 Lynn Avenue , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4914149 Main entry Study Formal Dinning Butler Pantry NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 12:49 PM Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 112 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 17 Indicated before and after benefit: $25,000 Percentage of after sale price: 1.63% Subject is from the Morningside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original levied assessment amount of $6,930, paid off by seller. Similar reliance has been placed on all the comparables; an old street value of $1,505,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $25,000. Paired Sales Set 17 FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$1,430,000 $1,450,000 $1,336,600 Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $17,000 $24,000 $6,000 Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction $70,000 $85,000 $125,000 Year Built $0 $12,000 $1,500 Condition $40,000Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 8 4 3.50 9 4 3.50 9 4 3.50 8 4 2.50 $10,000Gross Living Area (GLA)($24,100)($20,000)$13,000 Basement Area 2223 1778 $8,900 1650 $11,500 1512 $4,200 Basement Finishing $10,000 ($15,000)$15,000 Functional UtilityHeating/Cooling Energy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($3,500)($10,000) Porch/Patio/Deck ($5,000) Fireplace(s) ExtrasSite Improvements Other $0Net Adjustment (Total)$81,800 $59,000 $159,700 Adjusted Sale Price $1,511,800 $1,509,000 $1,496,300 Edina Edina Edina Edina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 4001 Morningside Rd 4200 Oakdale Ave S 4306 Grimes Ave 4311 Morningside Rd 4 blocks NW 1 block W 3 blocks W $1,530,000 $431.11 $369.51 $379.98 $395.91Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length7/27/18 5/26/17 12/5/16 2/15/18 Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood0.15 0.16 Oversize/deep, 0.42 ($75,000) 0.21 Quiet street Generally level, some trees Generally level, some trees Generally level, mostly open Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2014 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street 2-story 2-story 2-story 2-story Luxury, unique design, high- end finishes Luxury, high-end yet somewhat inferior finishes Luxury, high-end yet somewhat inferior finishes Luxury, good quality yet inferior finishes 2018 2018 2010 2017New construction New construction Very good New construction 3549 3870 3816 3376 sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, WO 1330 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, very good 1089 sf finished, FR, BR, exercise room, bath, very good 1700 sf finished, FR, BR, rec room, bath, very good 925 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, very good Average Average Average AverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC Good Good Good Good Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage, oversized Attached 3-car garage Assumed deck & patio Covered porch & deck Porch & patio Covered porch & 2 decks 2 2 2 2 Good Good Good GoodGoodGoodGoodGood 4200 Oakdale Avenue S , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4795256 Front of home, which is located on a corner lot Front entryway Formal dining room. Very open floor plan.Family room with gas fireplace. Family room with plenty of light from windows. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 12:42 PM 4311 Morningside Road , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4892510 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 4 of 4 8/17/18, 10:03 AM 4306 Grimes Avenue , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4774620 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/17/18, 9:58 AM Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 Comp 3 113GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 18 Indicated before and after benefit: $18,450 Percentage of after sale price: 4.16% Subject is from the Morningside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original levied assessment amount of $6,973; buyer assumed a bal-ance of approx $6,600. Similar reliance has been placed on both comparables; an old street value of $425,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $18,450. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$434,560 $506,000 Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property Rights Financing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $4,000 ($25,000) Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction ($10,000)($25,000) Year Built $7,500 ($14,000) Condition ($20,000)($25,000) Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 8 3 1.75 8 3 2.50 ($5,000)6 3 2.50 ($5,000) Gross Living Area (GLA)$12,500 $13,000 Basement Area 1200 887 $6,300 984 ($5,700) Basement Finishing ($15,000)($20,000) Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport $7,500 Porch/Patio/Deck Fireplace(s)($6,500)($4,500) Extras Site Improvements Other $0Net Adjustment (Total)$6,300 ($91,200)Adjusted Sale Price $440,860 $414,800 Average Average Average 0 2 1 Average Average Average Detached 2-car garage Detached 1-car garage Attached 2-car garage Deck Patio Deck & Patio FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACGoodGoodGood Unfinished 550 sf finished, rec room, average 665 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, good Average Average Average 2000 1792 1784 sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, WO 1957 1942 1985 Average Average to above average Above average 2-story 2-story 2-story Average Average to above average Above average Generally level, mostly open Generally level, some trees Some sloping, good trees Rear pond & side local park Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2014 Public, poor street Public, poor streetNone apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood0.25 0.15 $25,000 0.28 $20,000 Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 2/29/16 12/1/15 5/12/17 Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION $221.73 $242.50 $283.63Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS 4 blocks NW 4 blocks NW $443,450 Edina Edina Edina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 4004 42nd St W 4004 Kipling Ave 4023 Lynn Ave Paired Sales Set 18 4004 Kipling Avenue , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4638137 Spacious living room flooded with natural light.Wonderful fireplace and flow into dining room Fabulous two-story home with paver driveway Front entryway--gleaming hardwood floors! Formal dining room flows perfectly from living room and main floor family room Main floor family room perfect for watching tv and overlooks the private back yard NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/17/18, 1:17 PM 4004 W 42nd Street , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4671265 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/17/18, 9:33 AM Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 114 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 4100 Lynn Avenue , Edina, MN 55416 MLS Number: 4914149 Main entry Study Formal Dinning Butler Pantry NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 12:49 PM PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 19 Indicated before and after benefit: $21,600 Percentage of after sale price: 1.95% Subject is from the Morningside Neighborhood, having new streets in 2014. Original levied assessment amount of $6,973; buyer assumed a bal-ance of approx $6,600. Similar reliance has been placed on both comparables; an old street value of $1,085,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $21,600. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$1,095,000 $1,128,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $3,000 ($21,000) Location Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements TrafficDesign (Style) Quality of Construction ($100,000)($50,000) Year Built $0 $10,500Condition$20,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 8 4 2.50 7 4 3.50 ($10,000)9 4 2.50 Gross Living Area (GLA)$26,700 ($36,300)Basement Area 1233 1156 $1,500 1568 ($6,700) Basement Finishing ($10,000)($10,000) Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport Porch/Patio/Deck ($3,000)($15,000) Fireplace(s)ExtrasSite ImprovementsOther Net Adjustment (Total)($6,800)($48,500) Adjusted Sale Price $1,088,200 $1,079,500 Edina Edina Edina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 4214 Scott Terrace 4208 Branson St 4100 Lynn Ave 4 blocks SW 5 blocks NW $1,106,600$343.24 $385.29 $301.36Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 10/7/16 7/5/16 7/31/18 Morningside Neighborhood Morningside Neighborhood Morningside NeighborhoodDouble lot - 0.46 0.16 $85,000 0.26 $60,000 Some sloping, good trees Generally level and open Some sloping and trees Average residential Average residential Average residentialPublic, new street in 2014 Public, poor street Public, poor streetNone apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street 2-story 2-story 2-story Luxury, good finishes Luxury, upgraded design & finishes Luxury, superior finishes 2015 2015 2008New construction New construction Very good 3224 2842 3743sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, below grade 1225 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, good 999 sf finished, FR, BR, wet bar room, bath, superior finishes 1,104 sf finished, FR, BR, rec room, bath, good Average Average AverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Attached 2-car garage Deck & patio Covered patio w/ gas fplc Glazed porch & deck 2 2 2GoodGoodGoodGoodGoodGood Paired Sales Set 19 4200 Branson Street , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4910960 Beautiful Tudor character Wonderful front and side yards Large open living room Wood burning fireplace Plenty of room to hold dinner guests Updated lighting NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/17/18, 9:47 AM Subject Comp 1 Comp 2 115GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5409 Londonderry Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4904857 1.43 acre estate in the prime Parkwood Knolls neighborhood, virtually rebuilt and expanded in 2005 This private estate setting with room for a swimming pool and/or tennis court. Honed granite counter tops, Top of line appliances, prep sink, buffet and much more The fabulous remodeled kitchen with its cherry cabinetry by Woodshop of Avon 3 large windows over the sink with western exposure overlooking the pond. An adjacent family dining alcove with built-in bench and custom-made cherry dining table. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 6 8/24/18, 10:24 AM Comp 2 PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 20 Indicated before and after benefit: $49,000 Percentage of after sale price: 3.63% Subject is from the White Oaks Neighborhood, having new streets in 2016. Original levied assessment amount of $25,061; buyer assumed an approx $24,000 balance. Most reliance has been placed on comp #4, which is from the same neighborhood; an old street value of $1,300,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $49,000. FEATUREAddress Proximity to Subject Sale Price (net of concessions)$1,217,500 $1,572,000 $1,278,390 $1,030,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification SourceVALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment Property RightsFinancing Terms Conditions of Sale Date of Sale & Mkt Conditions $31,000 ($8,000)$19,000 $78,000 Location $100,000 $100,000 Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction $75,000 Year Built ($3,000)($19,500)$3,000 $1,500 Condition $50,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs BathsRoom Count 8 4 4.50 9 4 2.50 $20,000 12 5 5.50 ($10,000)11 5 4.50 9 4 2.50 $20,000 Gross Living Area (GLA)$19,100 ($164,600)($120,800)$25,900Basement Area 1514 1745 ($14,600)4068 ($51,100)2994 ($29,600)1580 ($1,300) Basement Finishing $5,000 ($10,000)$7,500 $10,000 Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($7,500)($15,000)($7,500)$1,000 Porch/Patio/Deck $30,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 Fireplace(s)ExtrasSite Improvements Other $0Net Adjustment (Total)$55,000 ($318,200)($43,400)$270,100 Adjusted Sale Price $1,272,500 $1,253,800 $1,234,990 $1,300,100 Good Good Good GoodGood 2 2 2 2GoodGoodGoodGood2Good Attached 2-car garage, heated Attached 3-car garage Attached 2-car and detached 2-car garages Attached 2-car garage Glazed porch, patio, gazebo w/ fplc Decking & quality patio Patio Patio Attached 3-car garage Patio FA & hot water, AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverageFA/ACAverage 1028 sf finished, amusement room, office, bath, good 882 sf finished, FR, BR, bath, good 1400 sf finished, FR, billiard room, bath, good 1000 sf finished, FR, exercise room, bath, avg Average Average Average Average 714 sf finished, FR, exercise room, bath, good Average 3355 3100 5550 3010sf, below grade sf, WO sf, below grade sf, below grade4965sf, below grade 1940 1942 1953 1939GoodGoodGoodAverage1938Good 2-story 2-story 2-story 2-story Good Above average to good Good Good 2-story Good Good sloping and trees Good sloping & trees Some sloping and trees Some sloping and trees Average residential Wetland/pond, some shape inefficiencies Pond across street Average residential Public, new street in 2016 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street White Oaks Neighborhood Hilldale Neighborhood Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood White Oaks Neighborhood0.48 1.08 ($100,000) 1.43 ($175,000) 0.34 $50,000 Quiet street Interlachen Hts Neighborhood0.78 ($50,000) Some sloping and trees Average residential Public, poor street None apparentQuiet street Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length 1/19/18 7/29/15 7/26/18 7/23/10 Arm's length 8/1/16 Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simpleCash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market termsFee simpleMarket terms MLS, public records, broker MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONMLS, public recordsDESCRIPTION $402.09 $392.74 $283.24 $342.19Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS $257.48 Public data, MLS 1.5 miles W 3 miles SW Same block $1,349,000 2.75 miles WEdinaEdinaEdina Edina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #4 4707 Townes Rd 17 Circle W 5409 Londonderry Rd 4717 Townes Road COMPARABLE SALE #3 4930 Green Farms CircleEdina Paired Sales Set 20 4707 Townes Road , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4890191 Stunning landmark home on a prime half acre site in the sought-after East Edina White Oaks neighborhood The backyard is gently terraced with beautiful perennial gardens French doors open from the vestibule to the spacious foyer that has arched doorways & wide plank wood floors. The main grand turned staircase offers a huge west facing 12 over 16 paned window and ascends to the second floor landing NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 5 8/23/18, 8:54 PM Subject4930 Green Farms Circle , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4682094 Gorgeous remodel of existing 1930's charming Interlachen home. Additional 3,000 square feet of stunning space. .83 acre that oozes charm! Great outdoor spaces that allow for patio dining and entertaining. South facing with green lawns and fresh landscaping. Perennials and flowering shrubbery make this a stand out addition to the neighborhood. Hardwood floors, bead board ceilings and enameled and dark hardwood cabinetry. Gorgeous granite, and tons of light! Opaque glass barn doors could be installed to separate the foyer and kitchen spaces, if you wish. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/24/18, 9:59 AM Comp 3 4717 Townes Road , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 3930111 Beautiful White Oaks neighborhood home! NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/23/18, 10:13 PM Comp 4 17 Circle W , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4606454 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 3 8/24/18, 10:26 AM Comp 1 116 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 5409 Londonderry Road , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4904857 1.43 acre estate in the prime Parkwood Knolls neighborhood, virtually rebuilt and expanded in 2005 This private estate setting with room for a swimming pool and/or tennis court. Honed granite counter tops, Top of line appliances, prep sink, buffet and much more The fabulous remodeled kitchen with its cherry cabinetry by Woodshop of Avon 3 large windows over the sink with western exposure overlooking the pond. An adjacent family dining alcove with built-in bench and custom-made cherry dining table. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 6 8/24/18, 10:24 AM Comp 2 PAIRED SALES ANALYSIS (CONTINUED) Paired Sales Set 21 Indicated before and after benefit: $75,000 Percentage of after sale price: 4.62% Subject is from the White Oaks Neighborhood, having new streets in 2016. Buyer assumed special assessments - original pending amount of $26,700, levied amount of $25,061; $25,000 used to adjust price. Similar reliance has been placed on all the comparables; an old street value of $1,550,000 is concluded, resulting in a new street value benefit indication of $75,000. FEATUREAddress Proximity to SubjectSale Price (net of concessions)$2,020,000 $1,572,000 $1,278,390 $1,380,000Price/GLAData SourceVerification Source VALUE ADJUSTMENTS +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ Adjustment +(-) $ AdjustmentProperty Rights Financing Terms Conditions of SaleDate of Sale & Mkt Conditions $46,000 ($21,000)$9,000 ($19,000) Location ($150,000)$100,000 $100,000 Site Size in Acres Terrain View Utilities & Streets Easements Traffic Design (Style) Quality of Construction ($100,000)$150,000 Year Built $1,500 ($21,000)$1,500 ($16,500) Condition $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $150,000 Above Grade Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Total BRs Baths Room Count 10 5 4.50 13 6 3.50 $10,000 12 5 5.50 ($10,000)11 5 4.50 8 4 3.50 $10,000Gross Living Area (GLA)($50,300)($68,600)($24,800)$45,800 Basement Area 2292 2752 ($19,200)4068 ($35,500)2994 ($14,000)1811 ($400) Basement Finishing $12,000 ($15,000)$2,000 ($20,000) Functional UtilityHeating/CoolingEnergy-Efficient Items Garage/Carport ($7,500)($15,000)($7,500)($7,500) Porch/Patio/Deck ($35,000)($40,000) Fireplace(s)($5,000) ExtrasSite Improvements Other $0 Net Adjustment (Total)($397,500)($161,100)$116,200 $202,400Adjusted Sale Price $1,622,500 $1,410,900 $1,394,590 $1,582,400 COMPARABLE SALE #4 6 Circle WEdinaEdinaEdinaEdinaEdina SUBJECT COMPARABLE SALE #1 COMPARABLE SALE #2 COMPARABLE SALE #3 4708 Townes Rd 10 Merilane Ave 5409 Londonderry Rd 4930 Green Farms Circle 1.75 miles W 3 miles SW 2.75 miles W 1.5 miles W $1,625,000$350.59 $380.70 $283.24 $257.48 $342.94MLS, public records, broker Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLS Public data, MLSMLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public records MLS, public recordsDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTIONFee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Fee simple Cash equivalent Market terms Market terms Market terms Market terms Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length Arm's length3/31/17 1/4/15 7/26/18 8/1/16 7/30/18 White Oaks Neighborhood Rolling Green Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood Interlachen Hts Neighborhood Hilldale Neighborhood 0.39 1.47 ($200,000) 1.43 ($175,000) 0.78 ($50,000) 0.78 Quiet street Quiet street ($50,000) Some sloping, good trees Very good sloping and trees Some sloping and trees Some sloping and trees Generally level, some trees Average residential Average residential Pond across street Average residential Average residential Public, new street in 2016 Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor street Public, poor streetNone apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent None apparent Quiet street Quiet street Quiet street 2-story 2-story 2-story 2-story 2-story Good Very good Good Good Above average to good 1939 1938 1953 1938 1950 Good, 2003 complete renovation Average Good Good Average 4635 5306 5550 4965 4024 sf, below grade sf, WO sf, below grade sf, below grade sf, walkout 1100 sf finished, FR, game room, bath, good 763 sf finished, FR, bath, good 1400 sf finished, FR, billiard room, bath, good 714 sf finished, FR, exercise room, bath, good 1503 sf finished, FR, office, BR, bath, good Average Average Average Average AverageFA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/AC FA/ACAverageAverageAverageAverageAverage Attached 2-car garage, heated Attached 3-car garage Attached 2-car and detached 2-car garages Attached 3-car garage Attached 3-car garage Patio Large porch Patio Patio Glazed porch, deck & patio Good 3 5 2 2 2 Good Good Good Good GoodGoodGoodGoodGood Paired Sales Set 21 4708 Townes Road , Edina, MN 55424 MLS Number: 4760323 4708 Townes Road. An Edina Classic!The leaded glass entry & handcrafted wrought iron stair rail is a reflection of the quality seen throughout the home. Captivating Entry.Exquisite sun-lit living room anchored by a cast masonry fireplace. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/23/18, 7:31 PM Subject4930 Green Farms Circle , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4682094 Gorgeous remodel of existing 1930's charming Interlachen home. Additional 3,000 square feet of stunning space. .83 acre that oozes charm! Great outdoor spaces that allow for patio dining and entertaining. South facing with green lawns and fresh landscaping. Perennials and flowering shrubbery make this a stand out addition to the neighborhood. Hardwood floors, bead board ceilings and enameled and dark hardwood cabinetry. Gorgeous granite, and tons of light! Opaque glass barn doors could be installed to separate the foyer and kitchen spaces, if you wish. NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/24/18, 9:59 AM Comp 3 6 Circle W , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4934227 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?n... 1 of 4 8/24/18, 10:20 AM Comp 4 10 Merilane Avenue , Edina, MN 55436 MLS Number: 4534918 NorthstarMLS Matrix https://matrix.northstarmls.com/Matrix/Public/PhotoPopup.aspx?... 1 of 1 8/24/18, 10:28 AM Comp 1 117GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Summary Telephone and email interviews were conducted with 32 Realtors hav-ing experience in Edina, all having recent sales and/or active listings. Many of the interviews focused on the property they were involved with selling and how the street reconstruction and assessments impacted the property’s value in selling the home. In addition, those Realtors having familiarity with the Rolling Green neighborhood were specifically asked their opinions for the potentially high assessment amounts in that neighborhood. All the Realtors’ comments were used in this analysis, and the results are summarized as follows: 1. Positive opinions were the consensus - 26 of 32 had posi-tive opinions regarding correlation of benefit to assessment amount. 2. In the last 10 years, it has become more common for sellers to have buyers assume the outstanding special assessments for street projects. Of the 23 actual transactions that Realtors were contacted about, 17 of them had buyers assuming the assessments. 3. Upon a property transaction, Realtors are not pricing proper- ties less due to new or pending new streets. Sellers are not receiving less in proceeds and buyers are often fully taking responsibility of the new streets. 4. When sellers pay off the special assessments, Realtors are including new streets in their analysis of the overall condition of a home, along with roof, windows, HVAC, not specifically isolating out the new streets as a value item, especially for higher-valued properties. 5. A small minority of Realtors expressed valuation concerns - 5 of the 32 had the opinion that the value new streets create is less than that of the original assessment amount. While gen- erally saying there is value in new streets, they may reduce their listing price if a buyer was to assume the specials. 6. Some Realtors expressed very positive opinions - 9 felt that the value of the streets exceeds the assessment amount and value is created for the property. 7. Assessments as a percentage of value is a significant fac-tor. The general opinion was that large assessment amounts would not be a concern for buyers and sellers in high-end neighborhoods, such as Rolling Green. There is value ben- efit concern with dated-condition or lower-valued residences where the increased cost-to-value percentage might not be sustainable for such properties. 8. Specifically about the Rolling Green neighborhood, it was presented to the Realtors that assessments could be in the $25,000 to $30,000/lot range, and due to the large value of homes, Realtors generally would not lower their asking prices with buyers assuming the specials. The general consensus conclusions are: n Measurable market value benefit is supported n Realtors were mostly supportive of potential higher value benefit in Rolling Green n Concern was expressed for low-valued property RESULTS OF REALTOR SURVEY 118 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 119GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Summary We have completed a market study to assist the City of Edina in their future assessment policies. Our appraisal consulting work has focused on the market value benefit from reconstruction public streets within three sample and differing types of neighborhoods: 1. Morningside with 0.15 to 0.30-acre sites and good values 2. Melody Lake with 0.25 to 0.40-acre sites and good values 3. Rolling Green with 1±-acre sites having extremely strong values and appeal Several valuation tools have been employed, including resales, paired sales, and interviews with Realtors having experience in Edina. A significant amount of market data in our study has been analyzed. While costs have notably increased, the value benefit has been matching or exceeding costs for most of Edina. The resales and paired sales analyses both indicated typical benefit in the $10,000 to $30,000 range on a variety of neigh- borhoods and property values. With excluding the extreme and suspect indications, the average and median figures were as follows: Resales Average Value Benefit $17,595 (3.53%) Resales Median Value Benefit $19,000 (3.08%) Paired Sales Average Value Benefit $20,538 (3.04%) Paired Sales Median Value Benefit $21,050 (2.60%) Combined Average Value Benefit $19,027 (3.29%) Combined Median Value Benefit $20,250 (2.64%) On the following pages are a summary charts of all the value indications - including a histogram of value benefit indications from resales & paired sales, and scattergram charts of the indicated benefits of the combined resales and paired sales data, along with individual neighborhoods of Morningside and Birchcrest (similar to Melody Lake). Summary Comments, Observations and Conclusions: 1. While it may be difficult to isolate the value contribution from an individual amenity or feature, measurable market value benefit from new streets in Edina is supported from the combined data and from the Realtor interviews. 2. With new street improvements, the market appears to fully bear the cost when the original improvements are in poor condition. When the pavement has some remaining life where significant annual patching is not needed, a proration of the new pavement cost would be appropriate. All of the sample subject neighborhoods’ streets appear to be near the end of their useful life. 3. The combined histogram shows that the vast majority of value benefit indications are above $10,000, with the majority being above $15,000. 4. The combined scattergrams with computer-generated trend lines indicate increasing benefit as lot size increases. 5. Value benefit increases as property values increase - there is good correlation in the data, plus Realtor interviews support this conclu-sion. This is further demonstrated by a comparison of the average resales and paired sales data. The resales have an average benefit of $17,595 and an average price of $610,274. The paired sales have higher figures - $20,538 and $875,399 respectively. 6. New street benefit as a percentage of total property value remains a good measuring tool. 7. While the benefit as a percentage of total value decreases as property values increase, the dollar benefit amount is greater for high-priced properties. 8. Our study consisted of limited data for high-end properties having large lots. Extrapolating conclusions from the scattergrams support higher benefit. Intuitively, if moderate-size sites and values well below $1.0 million can produce new street benefit of $15,000 to $20,000, there is a reasonable expectation that large/upper-valued properties may achieve notably higher benefit. Furthermore, our analysis of the 3 high-end properties within White Oaks produced value benefit indications of $27,000 and above. Nevertheless, the upper bracket benefit is less tested. 9. While our study did not include many low-valued properties, there is value benefit concern with dated condition or low-end properties; Realtor interviews indicated this, plus an increased cost-to-value percentage might not be sustained for such properties. 10. Within Edina, it has become common for buyers to assume special assessments for street projects. 11. Some homeowners can be opposed to special assessments, and may have strong feelings of the negative financial impact on their own property. However, when it comes to selling the property, value benefit matching or exceeding the assessment amounts are being created by the reconstructed road. 12. Edina is somewhat unique. Many other communities assess only a portion of costs, with a large balance being funded from general taxes. Many of these policies are designed to keep contested appeals to a minimum. The new street/old street valuation variation may be reduced in other communities since street replacement will be funded from general taxes and not by the benefitting property owners. For example, in Minnetonka owners of properties within old street neighborhoods will not need to bear the cost of street reconstruction. With Edina’s strong market with upper values, low general taxes and a desire/expectation for good public services and infrastructure, the market acceptance of assessments where benefit can be shown is good. SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS 120 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) Final Conclusion For The Sample Subject Neighborhoods Based upon all of our research and analysis, and applying the prior conclusions, we conclude the following market value benefits for the 3 sample subject neighborhoods: Morningside with 0.15 to 0.30-Acre Lots: $10,000 to $15,000 (1.4% to 2.1% on a $700,000 residence) Melody Lake with 0.25 to 0.40-Acre Lots:$15,000 to $20,000 (3.0% to 4.0% on a $500,000 residence) Rolling Green with 1+ Acre Lots: $25,000 to $30,000 (1.0% to 1.2% on a $2,500,000 residence) Note that these are average values where there may be some exceptions, such as small/modest homes on poor-feature lots may be less, and larger-than-average sites with strong values commanding site premiums would be greater. These conclusions are above the 2005 conclusions, yet are supported by increased costs and recent market analysis. Please review the “extraordinary assumptions and hypothetical conditions” section of this report on page 16 before relying on the values, recom- mendations, or other conclusions. Histogram of Value Benefit Indications 121GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) Scattergram of All Resale & Paired Sales 122 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) Scattergram of All Resale & Paired Sales 123GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) Scattergram of All Resale & Paired Sales from Morningside 124 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) Scattergram of All Resale & Paired Sales from Morningside Comments on Morningside Market Data The analysis of the Morningside Neighborhood having small lots sizes are generally supportive of the overall Edina market new street benefit conclusions, plus support the specific benefit conclusion of $10,000 to $15,000 per property within this neighborhood. 125GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) Scattergram of All Resale & Paired Sales from Birchcrest (similar to Melody Lake) 126 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN SUMMARY AND FINAL CONCLUSIONS (CONTINUED) Scattergram of All Resale & Paired Sales from Birchcrest (similar to Melody Lake) Comments on Birchcrest Market Data The analysis of the Birchcrest Neighborhood (similar to Melody Lake) having moderate lots sizes are generally supportive of the overall Edina market new street benefit conclusions, plus support the specific benefit conclusion of $15,000 to $20,000 per property within these neighborhoods. 127GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN 128 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 129GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN QUALIFICATIONS OF THOMAS J. DAY Designated, experience, education, memberships, profession- alism and integrity. Thomas Day has 39 years of real estate ap- praisal and consulting experience. He is the president and part-ner of Day Group LLC. Prior to co-founding Day Group LLC, he was a co-founder, principal, shareholder and officer of The Valua- tion Group, Inc., and was a former owner and officer of the Lyle H. Nagell & Co., Inc. Mr. Day has had extensive training and experience. After graduat-ing from the University of Minnesota with a business degree having an emphasis in finance, he began his appraisal career in 1978. Nu- merous Appraisal Institute courses and educational offerings have been completed pertaining to real estate and valuation issues. He has a diverse appraisal practice, yet specializes in income produc-ing properties and litigation matters. Challenging assignments in- clude difficult highest and best use analyses, market studies, special use projects, and detailed analysis and support in eminent domain proceedings. Tom maintains both his MAI and SRA designations with The Ap- praisal Institute, and has served the North Star Chapter of the Ap- praisal Institute in numerous leadership capacities, including as past president. Other memberships include the National Associa-tion of Realtors, and the Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors. He holds a Certified General Real Property appraisal license. Mr. Day competently supports and communicates his professional findings and opinions, and has testified as an expert witness in Dis-trict Court, Federal Court, and in condemnation proceedings before District Court-appointed county commissions. EDUCATION n Bachelor of Science Degree - Business Administration, 1978 honor graduate from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, with an emphasis in finance APPRAISAL EDUCATION The Appraisal Institute n Capitalization Theory & Techniques, Part A n Appraisal Report Writing Seminar n Capitalization Theory & Techniques, Part B n Discounted Cash Flow Seminar n Case Studies in Commercial Highest And Best Use n Standards Of Professional Practice n Income Property Valuation In The 1990s Seminar n Subdivision Analysis n Evaluations &The Real Estate Appraisal Industry Seminar n Toxic Contamination n Case Studies In Real Estate Valuation n Appraisal of Local Retail Properties n Appraising Troubled Properties Seminar n Wetlands and Property Evaluations n Eminent Domain and Condemnation Appraising n Upscale Urban Townhouse Development n Senior Demographics and its Impact on Senior Housing n Multi-Family Housing—the Future n Attacking & Defending Appraisal in Litigation n Regional Retail Malls Seminar n Fundamental of Separating Real Property, n Eminent Domain Personal Property, and Intangible Business Assets n Construction Disturbance & Temporary Loss n Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions of Going Concern Appraisal Institute designated members have met rigorous requirements relating to education, testing, experience and demonstration of knowledge, understanding and ability. Most designated members hold one or more of the following designations: The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation and evaluation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of properties, and who advise clients on real estate investment decisions. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the MAI designation are as follows: MAI Education: Experience: Receive credit for 6,000 hours of experience, including 3,000 hours of specialized appraisal experience, all of which must meet strict criteria. Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to income-producing property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, including handling physical incurable depreciation, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Receive a passing grade on 11 examinations that reflect 380 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of basic and advanced appraisal principles, procedures and applications; report writing; valuation analysis and standards of professional practice Receive a passing grade on a four-module, two-day comprehensive examinationHold an undergraduate degree from a four-year accredited educational institution The professional membership designation is held by real estate solutions providers who are experienced in the analysis and valuation of residential real property. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the SRA designation are as follows SRA Education: Experience: Receive credit for 3,000 hours of Residential Appraisal Experience (must cover at least 24-months). Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to a residential property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality, or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Education: Receive a passing grade on six examinations that reflect 200 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of appraisal principles, residential valuation techniques, report writing and standards of professional practice Hold an Associate degree from an accredited educational institution (or satisfy a specified alternative) The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of property. The requirements that an appraiser must have fulfilled for the SRPA designation were as follows: SRPA 11/21/05 4:38 PMAppraisal Institute Designations Page 1 of 2http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/about/designations_popup.asp Appraisal Institute designated members have met rigorous requirements relating to education, testing, experience and demonstration of knowledge, understanding and ability. Most designated members hold one or more of the following designations: The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation and evaluation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of properties, and who advise clients on real estate investment decisions. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the MAI designation are as follows: MAI Education: Experience: Receive credit for 6,000 hours of experience, including 3,000 hours of specialized appraisal experience, all of which must meet strict criteria. Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to income-producing property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, including handling physical incurable depreciation, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Receive a passing grade on 11 examinations that reflect 380 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of basic and advanced appraisal principles, procedures and applications; report writing; valuation analysis and standards of professional practice Receive a passing grade on a four-module, two-day comprehensive examinationHold an undergraduate degree from a four-year accredited educational institution The professional membership designation is held by real estate solutions providers who are experienced in the analysis and valuation of residential real property. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the SRA designation are as follows SRA Education: Experience: Receive credit for 3,000 hours of Residential Appraisal Experience (must cover at least 24-months). Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to a residential property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality, or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Education: Receive a passing grade on six examinations that reflect 200 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of appraisal principles, residential valuation techniques, report writing and standards of professional practice Hold an Associate degree from an accredited educational institution (or satisfy a specified alternative) The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of property. The requirements that an appraiser must have fulfilled for the SRPA designation were as follows: SRPA 11/21/05 4:38 PMAppraisal Institute Designations Page 1 of 2http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/about/designations_popup.asp Thomas J. Day, MAI, SRA GROUP LLCDAY 130 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN QUALIFICATIONS OF THOMAS J. DAY (CONTINUED) The Society Of Real Estate Appraisers n Introduction To Appraising Real Property, Course 101 n Evaluating Residential Construction n Applied Residential Appraising, Course 102 n Building Codes and Inspections Seminar Other Organizations n Appraising Conservation Easements—American Society of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers n State of Minnesota vs. Woodridge Plaza L.P. Seminar—International Right of Way Association n Mock Trial Seminar—International Right of Way Association n FHA Single-Family New Construction Appraisal Training Seminar/HUD Training Seminar—HUD n Right of Way Professional Conferences—Minnesota Department of Transportation n Comprehensive Appraisal Workshop—Ted Whitmer n The Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Act—International Right of Way Association LICENSES AND AFFILIATIONS n Minnesota General Real Property Appraiser License No. 4000814 n Member - MAI designated member of Appraisal Institute n Member - SRA designated member of Appraisal Institute n Past service of the North Star Chapter of the Appraisal Institute as President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasur- er, Nominating Committee Chair, Education Committee Member, Finance Committee member, Residential Ad- missions Committee Chair, Bylaws Committee Chair, Program Committee Chair, Residential Associate Guidance Committee Chair, Pro-Bono Committee member, Peer Review Committee member, and Scholarship Committee member n Member - National Association of Realtors CLIENTS SERVED Numerous individuals, attorneys, corporations, partnerships, non-profits, governmental agencies and lenders. Sample clients include the following: n Anchor Bank n Anoka Electric Cooperative n Bank of America n BMO Harris Bank / M & I Bank n Bremer Bank n Bridgewater Bank n Briggs and Morgan n Burnsville School District n The Business Bank n Central Community Housing Trust / Aeon n Citizens Bank n City of Bloomington n City of Circle Pines n City of Edina n City of Minneapolis n City of Minnetonka n City of Orono n City of Plymouth n City of St. Louis Park n City of Wayzata n Fredrikson & Byron, P.A. n First American Bank n First Federal n GE Capital n Gray, Plant, Mooty n Habitat For Humanity n Hennepin County n Highland Banks n Honeywell n Hopkins School District n Kennedy & Graven n Lakeville School District n Metropolitan Airports Commis- sion n Midland Financial n Midway National Bank n Minneapolis Community Plan- ning & Economic Development n Minneapolis Library n Minneapolis Park and Recre- ation Board n Minneapolis Public Works De- partment n Minneapolis School District n MN Office of Attorney General n MN Department of Commerce n MN Dept of Transportation n MN State Fair n New Market Bank n New York Life Insurance Com- pany n Park National Bank n Powderhorn Residents Group n Premier Bank n Project For Pride in Living, Inc. n Ramsey County n Richfield Bank and Trust n Redesign, Inc. n Sherburne State Bank n Southside Neighborhood Hous- ing Services n State of Minnesota n RBC Builder Finance n TCF Bank n Three Rivers Park District n Union Bank and Trust n U.S. Bancorp n U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service n Voyager Bank n Wells Fargo Bank n Xcel Energy 131GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN QUALIFICATIONS OF THOMAS J. DAY (CONTINUED) CURRENT APPRAISAL LICENSE Thomas Day holds a Minnesota Certified General Real Property Appraiser license. THOMAS J DAY12905 27TH PLACE NOPLYMOUTH, MN 55441 STATE OF MINNESOTA The Undersigned COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE for the State of Minnesota hereby certifies that THOMAS J DAY 12905 27TH PLACE NOPLYMOUTH, MN 55441 has complied with the laws of the State of Minnesota and is hereby licensed to transact the business of Resident Appraiser : Certified General License Number: 4000814 unless this authority is suspended, revoked, or otherwise legally terminated. This license shall be in effectuntil August 31, 2020. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this July 19, 2018. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE Minnesota Department of Commerce Licensing Division 85 7th Place East, Suite 500 St. Paul, MN 55101-3165 Telephone: (651) 539-1599 Email: licensing.commerce@state.mn.us Website: commerce.state.mn.us Notes: •Individual Licensees Only - Continuing Education: 15 hours is required in the first renewal period, which includes a 7hour USPAP course. 30 hours is required for each subsequent renewal period, which includes a 7 hour USPAP course. •Appraisers: You must hold a licensed Residential, Certified Residential, or Certified General qualification in order toperform appraisals for federally-related transactions. Trainees do not qualify. For further details, please visit our websiteat commerce.state.mn.us. 132 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 133GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN QUALIFICATIONS OF JONATHAN D. DAY Jonathan Day is a MAI-designated co-founder and partner of Day Group LLC, a real estate valuation and consulting firm. Mr. Day has 14 years of appraisal and consulting experience. He had been a senior staff appraiser with The Valuation Group, Inc. after achieving his Certified General Real Property Appraiser license in 2007. Mr. Day has had extensive training, and has the skill and experience to professionally complete your income property appraisal needs. His diverse practice includes eminent domain matters, and past property assignments include industrial facilities, retail buildings, office centers, apartment projects, mixed-use complexes, vacant land parcels, planned unit developments, subdivision analyses, and special-use facilities. Minnesota Certified General Real Property Appraiser Li- cense No. 20480945. Jonathan D. Day, MAI GROUP LLCDAY APPRAISAL EDUCATION The Appraisal Institute n Advanced Concepts and Case Studies n Advanced Income Capitalization n Business Practices and Ethics n Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use n General Appraiser Report Writing & Case Studies n General Applications n Basic Income Capitalization n National Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) Update Course n Reappraising, Readdressing, Reassigning: What to Do and Why The Appraisal Institute (continued) n Eminent Domain Seminar n Marketability Studies: Advanced Considerations & Applications Other Organizations n Introduction to Construction Principles n Introduction to Appraisal Principles I n Introduction to Appraisal Principles II n Introduction to Appraisal Practices I n Introduction to Appraisal Practices II n National USPAP 15-Hour Course n Appraisal Investment & Financial Analysis EDUCATION n Bachelor of Science Degree - General Business, 2004 graduate from University of Northwestern - St. Paul, St. Paul, Minnesota. Coursework included finance, statistics, business management, and economics. Appraisal Institute designated members have met rigorous requirements relating to education, testing, experience and demonstration of knowledge, understanding and ability. Most designated members hold one or more of the following designations: The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation and evaluation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of properties, and who advise clients on real estate investment decisions. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the MAI designation are as follows: MAI Education: Experience: Receive credit for 6,000 hours of experience, including 3,000 hours of specialized appraisal experience, all of which must meet strict criteria. Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to income-producing property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, including handling physical incurable depreciation, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Receive a passing grade on 11 examinations that reflect 380 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of basic and advanced appraisal principles, procedures and applications; report writing; valuation analysis and standards of professional practice Receive a passing grade on a four-module, two-day comprehensive examination Hold an undergraduate degree from a four-year accredited educational institution The professional membership designation is held by real estate solutions providers who are experienced in the analysis and valuation of residential real property. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the SRA designation are as follows SRA Education: Experience: Receive credit for 3,000 hours of Residential Appraisal Experience (must cover at least 24-months). Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to a residential property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality, or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Education: Receive a passing grade on six examinations that reflect 200 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of appraisal principles, residential valuation techniques, report writing and standards of professional practice Hold an Associate degree from an accredited educational institution (or satisfy a specified alternative) The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of property. The requirements that an appraiser must have fulfilled for the SRPA designation were as follows: SRPA 11/21/05 4:38 PMAppraisal Institute Designations Page 1 of 2http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/about/designations_popup.asp 134 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN QUALIFICATIONS OF JONATHAN D. DAY (CONTINUED) Recent Continuing Education n Annual Real Estate Trends Seminar n Twin Cities Land Development and Home Building - Pre Great Recession, Today and Beyond n Market Conditions Update - Office, Retail, Industrial and Capital Markets n Collaborative Discussion of Appraisal and Regulatory Issues in the Current Lending Environment n Mortgage Foreclosure Update n A Little Value For Everyone n Real Estate Valuation in Condemnation Appraising in Minnesota LICENSES AND AFFILIATIONS n Minnesota General Real Property Appraiser License No. 20480945 n Member - MAI designated member of Appraisal Institute CLIENTS SERVED Numerous individuals, attorneys, corporations, partnerships, non-profits, governmental agencies and lenders. Sample clients include the following: n BMO Harris Bank / M & I Bank n Bridgewater Bank n Bremer Bank n Center National Bank n City of Bloomington n City of Burnsville n City of Edina n City of Hopkins n City of Minneapolis n City of St. Louis Park n City of Wayzata n First American Bank n Gray, Plant, Mooty n Great Northern Bank n Liberty Bank n Hennepin County n Minneapolis Community Planning & Economic Development n Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board n MN Dept of Transportation n MN State Fair n Plymouth Church Neighborhood Foundation n Sherburne State Bank n State of Minnesota n State Farm Bank n RBC Builder Finance n Three Rivers Park District n Wells Fargo Bank 135GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN QUALIFICATIONS OF JONATHAN D. DAY (CONTINUED) APPRAISAL LICENSE Jonathan Day holds a Minnesota Certified General Real Property Appraiser license. JONATHAN DAVID DAY14232 23RD AVE NPLYMOUTH, MN 55447 STATE OF MINNESOTA The Undersigned COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE for the State of Minnesota hereby certifies that JONATHAN DAVID DAY 14232 23RD AVE NPLYMOUTH, MN 55447 has complied with the laws of the State of Minnesota and is hereby licensed to transact the business of Resident Appraiser : Certified General License Number: 20480945 unless this authority is suspended, revoked, or otherwise legally terminated. This license shall be in effect until August 31, 2020. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this August 08, 2018. COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCE Minnesota Department of Commerce Licensing Division 85 7th Place East, Suite 500 St. Paul, MN 55101-3165 Telephone: (651) 539-1599 Email: licensing.commerce@state.mn.us Website: commerce.state.mn.us Notes: •Individual Licensees Only - Continuing Education: 15 hours is required in the first renewal period, which includes a 7hour USPAP course. 30 hours is required for each subsequent renewal period, which includes a 7 hour USPAP course. •Appraisers: You must hold a licensed Residential, Certified Residential, or Certified General qualification in order toperform appraisals for federally-related transactions. Trainees do not qualify. For further details, please visit our websiteat commerce.state.mn.us. 136 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN Page intentionally blank 137GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE Day Group LLC Fernbrook Business Center 14232 23rd Avenue North Plymouth, Minnesota 55447 Phone 763-205-6966 www.daygroupmn.com “A real estate valuation and consulting firm committed to professionalism and integrity.” GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Day Group LLC is a Minneapolis-based provider of commercial real estate valuation and consult- ing services that serves the Twin Cities market and the state of Minnesota. We provide in-depth analytical services on a wide variety of real es- tate. Our commitment to professionalism and integrity along with our attractive graphic reports assure the highest level of service. The Day Group partners have over 71 years of appraisal experience. The firm is well positioned and has the expertise and resources to handle your valuation and consultation needs. Day G r o u p L L C 138 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE (CONTINUED) Principals The firm is led by co-founders and MAI-desig- nated partners Thomas Day and Jonathan Day, both having extensive experience. Jonathan Day is a co-founder and partner of Day Group LLC. Jon has 14 years of appraisal ex- perience. He had been a senior staff appraiser with The Valuation Group, Inc. after achieving his Certified General Real Property Appraiser license in 2007. His practice is diverse, and in- cludes eminent domain matters. Thomas Day has 39 years of appraisal experi- ence, and was a principal and co-founder of The Valuation Group, Inc. He was also a past owner and officer at Lyle H. Nagell, Inc. Mr. Day’s in- volvement within the appraisal industry is exten- sive, his practice is diverse, and it includes litiga- tion matters. Barbara Day is a co-founder and partner of Day Group LLC. Barb has assisted in the appraisal field since 1985, and obtained her real estate ap- praiser license in 2002. She had been a senior staff appraiser with The Valuation Group, Inc. after achieving her Certified General Real Prop- erty Appraiser license in 2007. We have the education, experience, resources and commitment to the highest standards to meet your real estate valuation and consulting needs. Appraisal Institute designated members have met rigorous requirements relating to education, testing, experience and demonstration of knowledge, understanding and ability. Most designated members hold one or more of the following designations: The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation and evaluation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of properties, and who advise clients on real estate investment decisions. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the MAI designation are as follows: MAI Education: Experience: Receive credit for 6,000 hours of experience, including 3,000 hours of specialized appraisal experience, all of which must meet strict criteria. Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to income-producing property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, including handling physical incurable depreciation, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Receive a passing grade on 11 examinations that reflect 380 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of basic and advanced appraisal principles, procedures and applications; report writing; valuation analysis and standards of professional practice Receive a passing grade on a four-module, two-day comprehensive examination Hold an undergraduate degree from a four-year accredited educational institution The professional membership designation is held by real estate solutions providers who are experienced in the analysis and valuation of residential real property. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the SRA designation are as follows SRA Education: Experience: Receive credit for 3,000 hours of Residential Appraisal Experience (must cover at least 24-months). Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to a residential property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality, or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Education: Receive a passing grade on six examinations that reflect 200 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of appraisal principles, residential valuation techniques, report writing and standards of professional practice Hold an Associate degree from an accredited educational institution (or satisfy a specified alternative) The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of property. The requirements that an appraiser must have fulfilled for the SRPA designation were as follows: SRPA 11/21/05 4:38 PMAppraisal Institute Designations Page 1 of 2http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/about/designations_popup.asp Appraisal Institute designated members have met rigorous requirements relating to education, testing, experience and demonstration of knowledge, understanding and ability. Most designated members hold one or more of the following designations: The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation and evaluation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of properties, and who advise clients on real estate investment decisions. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the MAI designation are as follows: MAI Education: Experience: Receive credit for 6,000 hours of experience, including 3,000 hours of specialized appraisal experience, all of which must meet strict criteria. Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to income-producing property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, including handling physical incurable depreciation, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Receive a passing grade on 11 examinations that reflect 380 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of basic and advanced appraisal principles, procedures and applications; report writing; valuation analysis and standards of professional practice Receive a passing grade on a four-module, two-day comprehensive examinationHold an undergraduate degree from a four-year accredited educational institution The professional membership designation is held by real estate solutions providers who are experienced in the analysis and valuation of residential real property. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the SRA designation are as follows SRA Education: Experience: Receive credit for 3,000 hours of Residential Appraisal Experience (must cover at least 24-months). Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to a residential property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality, or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Education: Receive a passing grade on six examinations that reflect 200 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of appraisal principles, residential valuation techniques, report writing and standards of professional practice Hold an Associate degree from an accredited educational institution (or satisfy a specified alternative) The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of property. The requirements that an appraiser must have fulfilled for the SRPA designation were as follows: SRPA 11/21/05 4:38 PMAppraisal Institute Designations Page 1 of 2http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/about/designations_popup.asp GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Appraisal Institute designated members have met rigorous requirements relating to education, testing, experience and demonstration of knowledge, understanding and ability. Most designated members hold one or more of the following designations: The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation and evaluation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of properties, and who advise clients on real estate investment decisions. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the MAI designation are as follows: MAI Education: Experience: Receive credit for 6,000 hours of experience, including 3,000 hours of specialized appraisal experience, all of which must meet strict criteria. Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to income-producing property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, including handling physical incurable depreciation, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Receive a passing grade on 11 examinations that reflect 380 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of basic and advanced appraisal principles, procedures and applications; report writing; valuation analysis and standards of professional practice Receive a passing grade on a four-module, two-day comprehensive examinationHold an undergraduate degree from a four-year accredited educational institution The professional membership designation is held by real estate solutions providers who are experienced in the analysis and valuation of residential real property. The current requirements that an appraiser must fulfill to receive the SRA designation are as follows SRA Education: Experience: Receive credit for 3,000 hours of Residential Appraisal Experience (must cover at least 24-months). Demonstration Report: Receive credit for a demonstration appraisal report relating to a residential property that demonstrates the ability to present a properly supported value estimate or opinion evaluating the nature, quality, or utility of a parcel of real estate or any interest in, or aspect of, real property, or fulfill an approved comparable alternative. Education: Receive a passing grade on six examinations that reflect 200 hours of classroom instruction and that test the appraiser’s knowledge of appraisal principles, residential valuation techniques, report writing and standards of professional practice Hold an Associate degree from an accredited educational institution (or satisfy a specified alternative) The membership designation is held by appraisers who are experienced in the valuation of commercial, industrial, residential and other types of property. The requirements that an appraiser must have fulfilled for the SRPA designation were as follows: SRPA 11/21/05 4:38 PMAppraisal Institute Designations Page 1 of 2http://www.appraisalinstitute.org/about/designations_popup.asp 139GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE (CONTINUED) Practice Our diverse practice includes a variety of income and special use property including: 3 Retail centers 3 Office complexes 3 Industrial facilities 3 Multifamily residential properties 3 Development projects 3 Subdivision analysis 3 Special use property 3 Market feasibility studies 3 Mixed-use projects 3 Multi-property portfolios 3 Affordable housing 3 Treatment centers 3 Gravel mines Our services include valuations and consultation for a number of purposes, including: 3 Condemnation Just Compensation valu- ation 3 Lending valuations 3 Easement valuations 3 Pre-condemnation scope of taking con- sultation 3 Inverse condemnation 3 Investment consultation 3 Valuation for estate planning 3 Special assessment appeals 3 Valuation and consulting relating to part- nership dissolution 3 General disputes relating to real estate 3 Review appraisals 3 Expert witness testimony 3 Litigation support 3 Highest and Best Use studies 3 Market feasibility studies 3 Market rent studies 3 Charitable contribution valuations 3 Environmental impact valuations 3 Tax appeal valuation & consulting 3 Insurance cost replacement analysis 3 Marriage dissolution property valuations Numerous clients have been served within the private and public sectors, including condemn- ing authorities, property owners, individuals, corporations, attorneys, governmental agencies, lenders and partnerships. GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY 140 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE (CONTINUED) Resources We are committed to professionalism. Our office within the Twin Cities is well equipped, including the following resources: 3 National, regional and local publications 3 Access to market trends and studies 3 Involvement with appraiser, broker and real estate databases 3 DCF analysis templates, plus Argus En- terprise cash flow valuation software 3 Appraisal Institute publications and library 3 Published cost manual - Marshall Valua- tion 3 State-of-the-art report writing and graph- ics software 3 Internal office-generated market studies 3 Trial exhibit-generating resources 3 Access to demographics software 3 Maintained real estate library Commitment We are committed to the highest standards of professionalism, diligence, integrity and ethics. Our commitment includes: 3 Full adherence to the Uniform Standards of Appraisal Practice (USPAP) 3 Full compliance with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Stan- dards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute 3 Increasing our knowledge base 3 Quality ongoing education 3 Research and market analysis pertinent to appraisal assignments 3 Diligent work ethic 3 Timely completion of assignments 3 Competency 3 Understanding and meeting the client’s needs 3 Review of final reports before submission GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY 141GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE (CONTINUED) Sample properties appraised/consulted on: Retail GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Normandale Shopping Center 142 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE (CONTINUED) Sample Properties Restaurants and Multi-Family GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Nicollet Island Historic Homes Laurel Village Apartments McKnight Village Apartments KFC 143GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE (CONTINUED) Sample Properties Office GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Grain Belt Office Plymouth Office Center Town Center Office Plaza 144 GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE (CONTINUED) GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Sample Properties Industrial 145GROUP LLCDAY Consultation Report 2018 - Street Reconstruction Value Benefit Study, Edina, MN COMPANY BROCHURE (CONTINUED) GROUP LLC REAL ESTATE VALUATION & CONSULTING SERVICES DAY Sample Properties Special Purpose and Subdivision Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.I. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Response to Resident Petition Highway 169 Noise Walls at Manor Homes of Edina Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to affirm staff's recommendation to continue to pursue this project with MnDOT. INTRODUCTION: See attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Survey Reponse Graphic Manor Homes of Edina Board Response City Survey Comments December 4, 2018 Mayor and City Council Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Response to Resident Petition Highway 169 Noise Wall at Manor Homes of Edina Information / Background: The City Council received a petition at the September 5, 2018 City Council Meeting from a portion of the residents at Manor Homes of Edina. The petition was against a proposed noise wall project along Lincoln Drive adjacent to Highway 169 north of Highway 62. 39 out of 144 units signed the petition. Prior to this petition, on April 17, 2018, the City Council approved a resolution of support and reviewed potential assessment to benefitting properties. This signaled to MnDOT that the city believed there is benefit of the project and that the city would be responsible for 10% of the project costs. Staff developed a map and assessment roll of the benefitting properties based on reduction of noise levels. 51 properties would have a reduction of noise from this project and potentially be assessed for the project. After receiving the petition, staff conducted a survey of all the units within Manor Homes. The survey had a 62% response rate or 89 out of 144. 34 of the 89 responses support the wall or 38%. Attached is a graphic of both the resident petition and the city survey. The difficulty with either survey is determining whether or not non-benefitting properties should have a say in the project. There is not strong consensus either for or against the project based on the surveys. Staff heard support at the February 7, 2018 resident meeting conducted at Public Works. Staff has also had many phone conversations with residents both standing to benefit from the project or those that are not. The Manor Homes Board of Directors also provided a statement and are taking a position in favor of the sound wall. As shown in the attached graphics, there is not a consensus on this particular noise wall. Therefore, it is staff and councils duty to act in the best interest of the residents. Staff receives many request to construct noise walls along highways 169, 100, and 62. In most cases, those requests cannot be filled. In this case, it can. Staff recommends continuing with the project as supported in Resolution No. 2018-32. G:\ENG\ADMIN\AGENCIES\STATE\MNDOT\Specific Projects\2021 169 Noise Walls\Legal\20181204 Council Staff Report 169 Walls.docx Legend , • , . , - - - - -.. .._ .. ._.. . .-....- . , ] 34 units Support Noise Wall per City Survey r 55 units Do Not Support Noise Wall per City Survey .. . .,. . • ,. . , . :-..,-4... 55 units Did Not Respond to City Survey ' - . 4..1, • , . • - , "i . . . ,. . . . — - • 1 , . A • . 1 N tt . , • , 4 41k ' r . ' ' . - - - . . .- . , . , . , . . ru Lq .: • .., — € • > , 4 ,'.. ' ,'' *it 0' 1111 r'- 0 . ' . 'J 6 • ' - '. '. . . ; , . . ., ,. .., - r.% I 2 a , • . ... L ' ' H V., LANtppRD , , i . ' ',', ,'• 928A2 ._ r .. • DR (PRIVATE) . 912, . , •.,... ot .. 6 , , _ . ii 6 i:6892 r-7, I .9 I ,,k -• ..........c5 C . 6800_14 r . CO .. Fl . •6801 c--, fl - 1,-.,,,. - *,'. et.._ 68 17 . :,•. 13 ..„. ... ....... ., ' -5---- - .,...i,.., 1$ n • , . ...i- • !'• i • ‘, ij or ____ ak _ - .,,,4_...:' , i,,, . • . 4r.. , ....„ , 1% 0 _',- , .. ,tx) AO ,Alr, r 4,•-• ,.\ . ___...... _ glen i CI) 14 rt''' • -- A' ''• , ' ri'-` ct) O.), '. 4 - .‘ , 'I, . ' .4 41 I en . 4- r; ,, . _. e i. ‘• • 0 # A , a,..• = . • 4. . . . 1 . 4014,4,, . ,:,-; . . .. P - . __ to;,,, . , . - MiNt•-:., L.: . . . 6857- .!7- " ....4, . , • , ' -..1', , 1 , ,,;" • `: -1. ,• ,;•T, • „. \ - T, '‘ ,,-'1,- • Al— 'T', ,, , .. ' f ..., e ,.. _ ‘ ., , . . ,.. • --.6..,_.,... I 1 t. 6841 r I ty eyt CYI I r I,.- . . 1 CO 1 „.., _ .. ' 04 • , , i 55 ,-. ,..,, . e I •41 I — o' ' • City Survey ,i4 a ..;).. . . .. ' - , , , .. . 0.$ 4 *4., ,-4 . ,. - • ,)t • Response Rate 62% (89/144) Resident Petition • . ., ,, . .; .. ,, .r...144;,,, , , .., - "... -- p..... ____, ;.,, ... .;:-.,.,, ,,, , . , - . Uli,--4-AIA 411=rIt ,..,.., ,,. ,.i i .. -hi — i Response Rate 31% , .... - e '• , . &war ,Gri comEra lic„,.._ , 1 ' ^ . '• -:„• •,.:- i• --. 1 ''..:. I '* -ik' ., 4 , ? • _ -- • . 'F-1 — i: ,, ' r • UI' , , '.i Signed Resident Petition - Did not Participate in City Survey 9% Signed Resident Petition - Changed Response on City Survey 2% ,• •'.+, • 4i....- ,t-i,. ., .., ".7..' , .. ,.. ...-. ., ; .. • -, — ...,. , • .1 •,. _ . I.( 4, -% : ,1' * ' .' A --.' _ .. .. . 4? ' . . _ _ ,_ ...,,,f„ ._ . .. sk... . . ... .... . , _ . (o N Survey Responses Noise Wall Improvements W+ E S TH-169 NB (Waterford Court to 5901 Lincoln Drive) Engineering Dept October 2018 Legend 44 units Do Not Support Noise Wall per Resident Petition .,• .4. 100 units Did Not Respond to Resident Petition r• • .Nj ). . • , . , . psiI • ••••,-.: ' ''' 4A4 ... . 1#` . 1, • . i,.., iL c.... .z. or; ‘.... -4.• 944 .1. of • a . 58 •I1 F, v, LAN 9RD ... t i 1 928-4 r : DR (PRIVATE) .--, P I ‹.' .4 A , 912- ., . • ,, 6 r r. . ." . ---4* '.6892-6906. :4 _....,..44.0.-: \ '0.;• i'' , r---,- , _ „___Ft ,.,„ il . i , ..,.._ , • • tit ....-.1- I 1 ' ' 680 ti 1 --1) 1 4. - 0 °. , I: 14 _ 4ir 64i, .......m. 1 ;680 ff l . •. •ti....c..., 1 —1 . *1 * ez ' • 4* • . _ „ , ,. :i, „ , 0 .4 % a ., n ... . 73 '.1 -913-31 , #.. . ___ ..1,-,i, .._, , - liGO /-• 4 — .''.4 GP 6 1 I . 123* 64'-'11c) moi, t x4- ? u . , I ,,. . g r i ::\ ---,dB— 4 , .. •.• ..p ;-;•., , 8 \ r ' . or or .. . oc• ye \k', , 4 r( 9 ,i-.6 — ....,•• •.. -6983 • 111. i 4 _ 00 : • ' - • .-' - . . . . . .17.*: . . ... ....... ,. c.,A, •o! , 1 , • N.7 ,; :6857— .,,,;f2i,.. .. , , , 7 , ..,. ./gtai -- 6085 - H. , _ v I ..,-,- 8 6841-55 ---,..-' : , .,. o ....t , . .. .„,„ . , ,,... .. , , • • _ , , 1 ...._,..i i..„,..„... _ .....4t—I...-- 214 = ,..r.. — -1 mot"" ,,,Ltgfn -.-To °" , 4, Petition Responses N W+E r,ny...? Noise Wall Improvements ri. S TH-169 NB (Waterford Court to 5901 Lincoln Drive) Engineering Dept October 2018 November 14, 2018 Mr. Millner, On November 7th, you sent an email asking if the Board of Directors for the Manor Homes of Edina Condominium Association (MHE) would take an official position regarding the proposed sound wall along Hwy 169 north. This soundwall would run parallel to the west side of MHE. The Board has solicited input from the owners of MHE and at our meeting on November 13, 2018 we voted to take a position in favor of the sound wall. The Board recognizes that we have no official input into the decision making process regarding whether or not to proceed with the proposed sound wall. We also would like to acknowledge that a number of our owners are not in favor of the proposed sound wall. The Board acknowledges that they have legitimate concerns. Should the City of Edina decide to proceed, the Board hopes that the CIty will solicit public input into the design of the wall and attempt to address some of those concerns. Ultimately, the Board decided to officially support the proposed sound wall due to input from owners who are most affected by the traffic noise from Hwy 169. They have said that the noise prevents them from opening windows, enjoying their patio/deck space, and can even interfere with having a conversation outside. Because some of our owners are unable to fully enjoy the use of their homes, the Board feels obligated to advocate for something that will ameliorate the situation. Sincerely, The Board of Directors, Manor Homes of Edina Condominium Association Resident Noise Wall Input - Manor Homes of Edina Q3 Comments Answered: 66 Skipped: 25 RESPONSES 1 Lived here almost 20 years. No need for a wall since the wall is a desire of the DOT with no input from residents before the fact and now with resistance from residents there is an inquiry. - Lev Martin The wall will block the light coming in. I don't like the appearance of a wall looming over our home. - Paula Martin 2 no additional comment 3 I do not support this at all - and am curious as to why my address would have to pay for this when I hear ZERO 169 noise and think this is NOT needed. Why are addresss very near the highway not having to pay at all? 4 6900 Langford area was built up over the last 35+ years. Any building along Lincoln Dr could not have missed the fact the 169 (AKA Cty 18) was already there. Anyone who moves into this area does so because they like, ie, some of the following: reasonable prices, in Edina, reasonable taxes, easy access to major freeways, etc. Any noise has always been there, BUYER BEWARE!! 5 I believe there is significant 'noise polution' and if left to address at later date ...more costly for homeowners. 6 All who live right on Lincoln facing 169 say they cannot afford this cost to them. 7 Noise isn't too bad right now, but it might be nice to have. I wouldn't have to help pay for it though, so that might also affect my position. 8 Scientific studies prove constant exposure to noise is harmful. It's very loud here. Property values will improve. The highway noise is so loud that it's difficult to have a conversation face to face outside on my patio. Have been frequently awakened by sirens and horns at night. Our condo's are on a hill compared to the road. A Wall will not be obtrusive because it's far enough away from the housing, across the frontage road even. The quality of life will be improved with a sound wall. Other manor home residents oppose the wall but they do not live at the front of the neighborhood where my unit is.. PLEASE BUILD The sound wall for Health and Safety. Thank you. 9 Eye sore, blocks sun, icy in winter 10 I strongly support the 169 Noise Wall in either wood or concrete forms. 11 I just don't think at this time there would be a need for a noise wall. 12 Not needed 13 the sound is very faint. We all knew it was there when we bought our townhomes. Not an issue. And it would keep out the scenery and feel blocked in for the neighbors on that side. 14 Though am not one of them, homeowners most directly impacted by the noise should have greatest influence on this survey. 15 I do not support this for many reasons. 1. Coming out of the Manor Homes I can judge the traffic I will face going north or south. 2. I do not notice road sound. 3. Would make me feel confinded & isolated. This is an unnecessary expense I can not and do not wish to have added to my bills. 16 What noise ? Not necessary! 17 Walls are enclosing and visually ugly - for the relatively few hours that traffic is heavy, it is not worth the expense our properties would pay!! 18 I like being able to see what is in my back yard, not giant slabs of concrete or wood. 19 The noise doesn't affect me. Also, I like to be able to see what the traffic is like when I'm leaving for work to determine if I need to take a different way. 20 I am on a limited income and it will prove to be a hardship for me. DATE 10/2/2018 7:21 AM 9/30/2018 7:57 AM 9/29/2018 8:23 PM 9/28/2018 1:41 PM 9/27/2018 10:32 AM 9/27/2018 8:14 AM 9/26/2018 6:27 PM 9/26/2018 3:09 PM 9/26/2018 11:54 AM 9/25/2018 8:33 PM 9/25/2018 8:21 PM 9/25/2018 8:04 PM 9/25/2018 3:37 PM 9/25/2018 2:01 PM 9/25/2018 11:46 AM 9/25/2018 11:05 AM 9/25/2018 10:39 AM 9/25/2018 5:35 AM 9/24/2018 6:33 PM 9/24/2018 3:09 PM 1 / 4 Resident Noise Wall Input - Manor Homes of Edina 21 We do not hear any noise at all and we do not support or feel it is necessary for us to have a wall built. 22 dont want my taxes to increase 23 Noise for units along/near Lincoln Drive is impacting their ability to enjoy their unit. While a noise wall is not overly attractive, it is needed given the increase in traffic. Hope the city ignores those who are against the wall but are not impacted by the noise. Seeing the sunset over the United Health Group complex is not worth other people not being able to have their windows open or be on their patio. 24 Not needed, costly, ugly, Windows are closed most of the time anyway. 25 We moved in about June 1st after buying the condo. 26 I believe people living closest to the highway should have the most input. 27 This is clearly something doing to benefit the Opus development (The Loden). Residents of Manor Homes didn't ask for it. Let Opus pay for it, if it is to be built at all. 28 If it has to be done. I'd want wood but I literally cannot hear 169 and like looking out at it in the morning to decide which way I should commute to work. I also don't want to pay for it because I literally see no benefit to me or my property's value with this noise wall. 29 169 doesn't noise really affect me. I find noise walls unattractive, especially since thy are all made of different components. 30 I think the wall should start at Vernon Hills Road or Habitat Court because just as much noise comes from 62. 31 It will block the afternoon sun. I do not want the noise wallIIIII 32 The wall is a great idea - the bigger the better 33 I am not effected by the noise. I feel sorry for the people that will be assessed since our Assoc is also raising the fees at the same time for improvements within our complex. 34 I am not impacted by the noise of 169. 35 I prefer the wood wall. 36 My response to this survey assumes the preliminary assessment for our property is a 1 time assessment, not an annual thing. 37 I feel it's important for people living close to road. I do not hear the noise living in lower part of MHE. I feel shouldn't be assessed for the wall. 38 I prefer being able to see how much traffic is on 169 when deciding on my route; I worry that the noise will rise above the wall and end up landing down the slope where I live; the walls are just plain ugly. 39 A sound wall isn't visually appealing. I don't want to be closed in. Do we really have a say? 40 My unit is part of the group of units that will have to pay for the noise wall. We do not hear any highway traffic from our unit whatsoever, especially now that the new apartments are blocking our view/noise of the highway. I believe the noise wall is NOT necessary at this time. 41 The wall is a necessary component to achieve higher property values. It will totally inhance the front entry of MHE, offering a proper presentation of our community to potential buyers. 42 The street noise doesn't affect my unit. I barely hear it and I like being able to look out when leaving the neighborhood. Looking at a concrete wall would make things feel so stale. 43 I own the first manor home next to HW169 and the noise wall would be very helpful with cutting down on the traffic noise 44 I think it will improve the look along the highway and help with noise in the area. I also am interested in getting this accomplished while the majority of the funding is coming from the State of MN. 45 I support the wall. 46 Could all residents of the Manor Home complex assessed? Will the concrete wall last longer? Near 5th Ave the wall appears to be something other than wood for cement. Is the material used on that wall possible? 2/4 9/24/2018 12:59 PM 9/24/2018 10:41 AM 9/24/2018 8:50 AM 9/24/2018 8:32 AM 9/24/2018 7:24 AM 9/24/2018 7:23 AM 9/24/2018 7:22 AM 9/23/2018 7:22 PM 9/23/2018 5:00 PM 9/23/2018 2:15 PM 9/23/2018 11:57 AM 9/23/2018 11:37 AM 9/21/2018 4:17 PM 9/21/2018 3:36 PM 9/20/2018 11:30 AM 9/20/2018 7:41 AM 9/19/2018 2:10 PM 9/19/2018 11:14 AM 9/19/2018 9:15 AM 9/19/2018 8:20 AM 9/18/2018 7:05 PM 9/18/2018 2:52 PM 9/18/2018 1:41 PM 9/18/2018 9:10 AM 9/17/2018 9:59 PM 9/17/2018 6:31 PM Resident Noise Wall Input - Manor Homes of Edina 47 The road noise from Hiway #169 has increased tremendously. There are other important issues to consider as well. Safety, from people hopping the fence on #169 to catch the bus, etc. My new windows no longer work to muffle the sound from the rumbling noise of semi-trucks. Plus: An important factor to consider is the decreasing value $$$ of my home. 48 My biggest problem with noise walls are aesthetics. I'm in MHE but have to admit that I'm not directly affected, at least visually. Those residents that are looking at 169 may feel differently, but the bottom line is that while I feel the noise walls are basically ugly, they seem to be effective in noise reduction. That's needed more than ever because for many MHE residents the noise from 169 is worse than ever because it now bounces off of the new Loden apartment complex next door. I support installation of noise wall and am having difficulty understanding the specific reason why some would be opposed. 49 I am a single mom of a special needs young man. $500 is way beyond my budget. I also think a noise wall would be unaesthetic. I don't want to look out my window and see a wall! I find the movement of 169 dynamic--As someone who has spent time in Chicago and Manhattan, to me, traffic "noise" and flow is simply part of the lifestyle. I'd like to mention too--Manor Homes has a very diverse & wonderful population--home owners, renters, older people, young families and people of different income brackets. When I saw the notice about a $500 assessment I felt sick-- When I read this latest one and saw it could be $900+--There is no way I could pay that in one installment. I am sure I am not alone in that. I'll simply conclude by saying that I have lived in Edina for more than 25 years--both of my kids went to Edina Schools and I feel completely connected to my community. I sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback. I have always felt that Edina is responsive and takes feedback into account. Thank you. 50 The only way I would want the noise wall is if there was no cost to me. 51 We do not wish to have additional concrete in our neighborhood. We do not want to look at a wood wall. Who wants a concrete noise wall? Opus? Then, they should have built the apartment complex downtown Minneapolis. Instead, the City of Edina let them build in our neighborhood. Thank you Opus and the City of Edina for the extra traffic. Thank you Opus and the City of Edina for cutting down all of those mature trees. No, we do not want want any walls along our frontage road. Yes, our frontage road, where we live, where we pay taxes, where we should be deciding such matters. How about you plant some trees since you seem to think there is enough room for a noise wall and charge Opus and the City of Edina. Do you think Edina will continue to be a desirable place to live at this rate? Stop building. Stop taking away what is desirable about Edina. 52 I feel like I'll be blocked in, besides I like to see if there is congestion on Hwy. 169 so I can take an alternative route. With the wall, I would be able to see this plus the nice sunsets. It won't be worth the assessment price; some people won't be able to afford it. 53 My opinion is the freeway noise does not affect us, at least not from our building to the east. The Opus complex diffuses the noise for us. I feel that the noise level at my building is minuscule and I don't see why we should be responsible for part of the bill. I am not for the wall and being told that our property values will go up means nothing to me. Finally, I do not care to look at any noise wall in my neighborhood. 54 I am always in favor of noise abatement. 55 I support the wood wall. I live in a building directly facing the freeway. I hope the wall will reduce the noise so I can open my windows and use my patio. 56 I have written a letter to the City Council (with Petition) and to Chad Millner prompting this survey. Aesthetics, sun blockage, isolation from the bustle of the city, cost, no budget in place for repainting a wood wall, etc. Please see my letter, thank you. Sue Kaiser. 57 Wall is not necessary in terms of my unit as no road noise is audible 58 My concern about the wall is that it will limit the sunlight I get. I do not get a lot of light. HOWEVER, the noise from 169 prevents me from sitting on my patio. So I vote for the wall. I think some of the people who oppose it because they will not see the sunset, are located farther from Lincoln and do not see the sunset anyway. Also, they will not be assessed for any part of the wall. So their vote should not have an impact. I prefer the wood wall because it is more attractive. 59 I appreciate voting no on this project. 60 Why was it never proposed before? The Manor Homes have been here for several decades? If Opus wants it for the apartments, they can pay for it. I do not want it if I have to pay any money for itilill They can add it to the money given Edina for leaving out "low income" housing. 9/17/2018 1:23 PM 9/17/2018 11:03 AM 9/17/2018 9:58 AM 9/17/2018 8:31 AM 9/16/2018 11:53 PM 9/16/2018 9:42 PM 9/16/2018 4:36 PM 9/15/2018 3:08 PM 9/15/2018 2:07 PM 9/14/2018 8:25 PM 9/14/2018 5:18 PM 9/14/2018 4:41 PM 9/14/2018 1:03 PM 9/14/2018 12:57 PM 3/4 Resident Noise Wall Input - Manor Homes of Edina 61 I am completely and entirely opposed to all options 62 I'm not 100% sure either way if I support or don't support a wall. I'm on a 2nd floor at Manor Homes and personally I don't think that the wall will do much to stop the noise, especially at a cost of $500-$940. What I don't really understand is why this is even coming up now, why wasn't this wall done years ago? Also the map is a little outdated. There are now apartments there, that should actually be assessed at the higher rate as well, wouldn't that potentially lower the cost for everyone, more units that are involved in it? But overall, based on information I've read about other noise walls, and the location, and dependent on height, I don't think it would do much. If there were a guarantee that the noise level would be cut in half, I'd probably be more interested, but there aren't any guarantees like that and it's only when my windows are open that it's really a big deal. 63 Several reasons, primarily the cost and blocking the view. People walk a lot along the frontage road and a wall would be too confining and takes away from the experience. 64 Thank you the road noise has gotten worse and worse 65 We feel that it would not be aesthetically appealing from either side of the wall. We also feel that it would convey a feeling of being closed off and we would lose the openness of our community. 66 I strongly support the wall and will be sorrowful if it isn't built. My unit faces 169. I seldom open my windows or use my patio, due to noise, dust from the freeway, and the loss of privacy from the United health care towers facing my building. I will pay the largest assessment for the wall but it would be worth it do I can regain the enjoyment of my home. Many of my neighbors who oppose the walls are concerned it will impact their walks at sunset and that they will feel isolated. But they are able to sit on their decks and patios and will continue to do so after a wall is built. A number of them are not being assessed, and many of those who are are over 65. At the presenttthis winter, we were told persons over 55 could delay payment until they sold. Please build this. 9/14/2018 9:01 AM 9/14/2018 8:16 AM 9/14/2018 7:00 AM 9/13/2018 7:26 PM 9/13/2018 6:31 PM 9/13/2018 6:16 PM 4/4 Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.J. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-128: Supporting Drafting a Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT for Landscape Partnership Program Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2018-128 allowing staff to work with MnDOT on a cooperative agreement for the Landscape Partnership Program. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-128 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-128 SUPPORT TO ENTER INTO A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH MnDOT FOR LANDSCAPE PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Edina has requested design assistance as part of the Minnesota Department of Transportations (MnDOT’s) Landscape Partnership Program along Vernon Avenue west of Highway 100, adjacent to the noise wall; and, WHEREAS, the MnDOT has completed the final landscape plans which includes ivy plantings along the noise wall; and, WHEREAS, the MnDOT’s Landscape Partnership Program will reimburse community’s for plants and related materials; and, WHEREAS, the City and MnDOT would like to enter into a cooperative agreement to detail cost sharing and installation in 2019; and, WHEREAS, the cooperative agreement will detail each agencies responsibility for installing and maintaining the plantings. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina supports working with MnDOT on a cooperative agreement for future consideration of the City Council as part of MnDOT’s Landscape Partnership Program. Adopted this 4th day of December, 2018. ATTEST:_____________________________ _________________________________ City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ________ day of _____________________, 20__. __________________________________ City Clerk Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.K. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Chad A. Millner, P.E., Director of Engineering Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-130: Receiving Engineering Studies for 2019 Neighborhood Reconstruction Projects Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Resolution No. 2018-130 receiving Engineering Studies for: BA-451, A-279 Chowen Park A & B BA-452 Indian Trails B & C BA-454 Todd P ark E BA-455 Indian Hills C INTRODUCTION: Public Hearings are scheduled for December 10, 2018. The Engineering Studies are attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-130 Indian Trails B & C Engineering Study Chowen Park A & B Enginering Study Todd Park E Engineering Study Indian Hills C Engineering Study RESOLUTION NO. 2018-130 RECEIVING ENGINEERING STUDIES FOR 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS CHOWEN PARK A & B, IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA-451, A-279 INDIAN TRAILS B & C, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-452 TODD PARK E, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-454 INDIAN HILLS C, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-455 WHEREAS, at the request of Edina City Engineer, studies have been prepared by staff and consultant with reference to the proposed Improvement Nos. BA-451, A-279, BA-452, BA-454, and BA-455, the improvement of Chowen Park A & B, Indian Trails B & C, Todd Park E, and Indian Hills C, and these studies are hereby received by the Council on December 4, 2018; and WHEREAS, the studies provide information regarding whether the proposed improvements are necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with said studies and the possible assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $2,629,000 (BA-451, A-279), $1,372,956 (BA-452), $58,500 (BA-454), and $179,550 (BA-455). 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 10th day of December, 2018, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. and the Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Dated: December 4, 2018 Attest:___________________________ _________________________________ Sharon M. Allison James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of _____________, 20___. ____________________________________ City Clerk ENGINEERING STUDY INDIAN TRAILS B/C NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Bello Drive, Comanche Court, Overholt Pass, Paiute Circle, Paiute Drive, Paiute Pass, Sally Lane, Shawnee Circle IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-452 NOVEMBER 26, 2018 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 42003 11-26-18 Aaron Ditzler Reg. No. Date Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of local bituminous streets, spot replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter, installation of new concrete curb and gutter, construction of retaining walls and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $2,698,616. The estimated roadway construction cost is $1,372,956 and will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $15,600 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $1,325,660 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure.” This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, storm sewer system and sanitary sewer system. LOCATION: The project includes Bello Drive, Comanche Court, Overholt Pass, Paiute Circle, Paiute Drive, Paiute Pass, Sally Lane and Shawnee Circle. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways The roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed between 1941 and 1991 (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood, 1971 Maintenance records indicate seal coating was performed within the project area in 1993 and 2007; Shawnee Circle was overlayed in 2011 and Sally Lane between Valley View Road and Paiute Pass was repaved in 2015 after installation of new storm sewer pipes (see Existing Storm Sewer). Most of the streets in the neighborhood have concrete curb and gutter. The average roadway width is 30’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb or edge of pavement). A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area performed by Braun Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 4 Intertec showed the roadway section varies from 3” to 5” of pavement over a silty sand clay and gravel base. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc.). The average PCI for the City of Edina is 72 and the average PCI for Indian Trails B/C is 35. An example of the current pavement condition can be seen in Photo 2. Photo 2: Existing Pavement Condition Traffic and Crash Data Staff measured traffic volumes and speeds at locations within or near the neighborhood. Average daily traffic volumes within the neighborhood range between 117 and 446 vehicles per day with 85th percentile speeds between 20.2 and 29.3 miles per hour. Traffic and crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Retaining Walls There are a series of natural stone retaining walls along the north side of Shawnee Circle and the east side of Overholt Pass within the project area. These walls were originally constructed between 1960 and 1971, and range in height from 6” to 8’. Sections of the walls are bulging out and/or are experiencing evident erosion of backfill soils. A recent geotechnical evaluation performed by Braun Intertec showed the wall backfill consists of topsoil, silty sand and trace amounts of gravel. Several large trees exist along the crest of the walls. The current condition of the walls can be seen in Photos 3 and 4. Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 5 Photo 3: Shawnee Circle Retaining Wall Photo 4: Overholt Pass Retaining Wall Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities There are no existing pedestrian facilities within the project area; however there is a sidewalk on Valley View Road immediately adjacent to the project area (see Appendix B). Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area; however there are bike lanes on Valley View Road immediately adjacent to the project area (see Appendix C). Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 6 Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system consists of 8”-9” vitrified clay pipe (VCP), 8”-10” ductile iron pipe (DIP) and 12” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) installed between 1964 and 1991. Historical records indicate there have been few sewer back-ups or blockages in the area (see Appendix D). Watermain The watermain system consists of 6” DIP and 1.25”-2” copper pipe installed between 1967 and 1991. The overall system has experienced relatively few breaks (see Appendix D). The fire hydrants are original to the neighborhood. Several homes in the neighborhood were constructed prior to the availability of municipal water. Although most have had private wells properly sealed, City records suggest some remain unsealed. Based on Utility Billing records, there are no homes that rely on private wells for domestic water. Storm Sewer The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundaries of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The system consists of 12”-36” RCP and 24” corrugated metal pipe (CMP) installed between 1969 and 2015. The majority of the streets within the project area drain to the south and eventually discharge to the Braemar Branch of Nine Mile Creek; a small area discharges to Indianhead Lake. Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications and cable utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are underground facilities located in backyards or along the boulevards; there are no overhead facilities. Street lighting consists of standard “cobra head” and “traditional” lights mounted on wooden or fiberglass poles located throughout the project area as shown in Appendix E. DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendices B and C, there are no proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the project area. 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 7 All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled. Replacement of the pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems. Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Reductions in impervious surfaces benefit water quality, and may lessen the demand for chemicals to manage snow and ice (such as chloride). Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place pipe liners. This project will also reduce inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix F. 2018 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan The CWRMP identified multiple areas of modeled flood inundation within the project area for both the 10-percent and 1-percent-annual-chance flood event (also referred to as the 10-year and 100-year frequency event, respectively). The first is along the Braemar Branch of Nine Mile Creek, between McCauley Trail and Sally Lane (see Figure 2). Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 8 Figure 2: McCauley Trail/Sally Lane Flood Zone (NMSB_52, NMSB_69, NMSB_77) 14-18 structures on Sally Lane could be impacted, as well as 3 structures on Sioux Trail. Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 9 The second area is at the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass (see Figure 3). Figure 3: Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Flood Zone (NMSB_83, NMSB_84) This modeled inundation area primarily impacts the roadway section of Sally Lane, but could impact 2-4 structures on Sally Lane. Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 10 The third area was identified between Sally Lane and Comanche Court (see Figure 4). Figure 4: Sally Lane/Comanche Court Flood Zone (NMSB_70) A backyard depression area collects approximately three acres of stormwater from the neighboring properties and discharges to the City’s storm sewer system via a backyard catch basin at 7013 Comanche Court. The 1-percent and 10-percent- annual-chance events could impact the structure at 7009 Sally Lane. These areas (NMSB_83, NMSB_84 and NMSB_70) were included in the 2014 STS- 406 Improvement Project prepared by Barr Engineering, which provided a detailed evaluation of several areas with high flood potential that corresponded to anticipated roadway reconstruction. Relevant portions of this report can be found in Appendix G. In 2015, 36” RCP was installed along Valley View Road and Sally Lane as part of the Valley View Road Reconstruction project to help alleviate flooding and provide opportunities for future improvements in these areas. A fourth area was identified on Paiute Circle (see Figure 5). Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 11 Figure 5: Paiute Circle Flood Zone (NMSB_75) This drainage area collects approximately 1.5 acres of stormwater from neighborhood properties and discharges to the City’s storm sewer system via a catch basin at 6910 Paiute Circle. This flooding only impacts the roadway section of Paiute Circle. A fifth area was identified in the backyards of 14 and 17 Bello Drive and 6916 and 6920 Dakota Trail (see Figure 6). Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 12 Figure 6: Bello Drive/Dakota Trail Flood Zone (NMSB_35, NMSB_82) These two backyard depression areas collect 2-3 acres of stormwater from the neighboring properties and are connected to the City’s storm sewer system on Valley View Road. Neither flood zone directly impacts a structure. Potential manhole surcharging was also identified in the 1-percent and 10-percent- annual-chance events. Staff Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. They support replacement of deficient watermain components (including fire hydrants, gate valves and water services) and improvements to the retaining walls Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 13 on Shawnee Circle and Overholt Pass based on their current condition. They also recommend replacement of existing CMP within the project area. Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire Departments. The Fire Department supports watermain improvements, including adding fire hydrants as necessary to meet public safety standards. They also note that temporary fire hydrants should be of a consistent style for ease of access, and that emergency access should be maintained at all times during construction. Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 25, 2018, a draft engineering study was provided for review. A question was raised as to why Sally Lane between Valley View Road and Paiute Pass is proposed to be reconstructed when the pavement was replaced in 2015. As part of the adjacent Valley View Road reconstruction project, new storm sewer pipes and structures were installed beneath Sally Lane, which required removal of the existing bituminous pavement. Although new bituminous pavement was subsequently installed, the roadway section was not built to current City standards. This work was financed by the City’s Storm Sewer Utility Fund; no properties along Sally Lane were subjected to a special assessment in 2015 other than the corner lots at Sally Lane and Valley View Road. Relevant minutes from the ETC meeting are included in Appendix H. Residents As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3 years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to an open house on September 25, 2017. Materials from this meeting are available upon request. On June 4, 2018, residents were asked to complete a questionnaire, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems within the project area. The questionnaire was completed by 35 of 93 property owners, a return rate of 38%. The following is a summary of feedback received from residents: • 16 of 94 (46%*) were concerned or very concerned with the speed of traffic in the neighborhood; 19 (54%) were not concerned. • 14 (40%) were concerned or very concerned with motorist behavior in the neighborhood; 19 (54%) were not concerned. • 19 (54%) identified an unsafe intersection within the neighborhood. • 25 (71%) walk, run, or jog in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. • 5 (14%) ride a bicycle in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. • 5 (14%) reported parking on the street at least 2-3 times per week; 24 (69%) reported parking on the street less than once per month. • 7 (20%) identified localized drainage problems in the neighborhood. *Percentages based on number of returned surveys The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix I. Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 14 A neighborhood informational meeting was held on August 13, 2018 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood and others proposed for construction in 2019. The meeting was attended by 19 residents representing 14 properties. Materials from this meeting can be found in Appendix J. Relevant correspondence from residents regarding the project can be found in Appendix K. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. Roadways Typical Section The bituminous roadways are proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. Due to an existing lack of aggregate base, recycling the existing pavement for use as base material in the new roadways is not practical. Instead, 8” of aggregate material will be hauled in, graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous base and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. All roadways within the project area are designated as Local Streets in the Living Streets Plan. Per this plan’s design guidelines, Local Streets have a typical width of 27’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb) without sidewalk or 24’ with a 5’ sidewalk on one side. The majority of the street widths within the project area will not be altered due to the proposed scope of storm sewer improvements (see Proposed Storm Sewer). Bello Drive is proposed to be constructed with a 27’ roadway section. Shawnee Circle and Overholt Pass are proposed to be constructed with a 24’ and 21’ roadway section, respectively, to provide space for retaining wall improvements (see Retaining Walls) and minimize construction impacts. Parking Per the Living Streets Plan, on-street parking should be evaluated based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand and construction and maintenance costs. As the land use in this neighborhood is residential, and given the existing demand for parking, staff believes that two-sided parking on most of the roadways within the project area is appropriate. One-sided parking is proposed for the north side of Shawnee Circle and the east side of Overholt Pass due to the proposed 24’ and 21’ widths. Roadway Signage All traffic signage within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix E). All new signs shall Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 15 conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Retaining Walls Gale-Tec Engineering, Inc. was hired by the City to assess the current condition of the walls on Shawnee Circle and Overholt Pass. They determined that without intervention, the backfill soil erosion is likely to continue, further compromising the structure of the wall. Due to the significant and unique wall length, height and repair costs, the City engaged Gale-Tec to evaluate reconstruction options. Based on conversations with residents, key criteria included wall materials, avoiding large excavations and minimizing impacts to adjacent properties. Four options for gravity walls were evaluated: Option 1: Leave existing walls in place and construct precast modular block (PMBW or “Big Block”) walls in front of existing walls Option 2: Remove existing walls and construct new natural stone walls with no-fines concrete backfill Option 3: Remove existing walls and construct “Big Block” walls Option 4: Leave existing walls in place and construct new natural stone walls in front with no-fines concrete backfill It is proposed to proceed with Option 4; Figure 7 depicts a typical plan view of the proposed retaining wall. This option will result in the least disturbance along the walls and the least required reduction to the roadway width (4’). Figure 7: Proposed Retaining Wall Construction The full report can be found in Appendix L. Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 16 Multi-Modal Transportation There are no proposed pedestrian or bicycle facilities within the project area. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer main has been televised, and portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) methods. These repairs will address the issues of sags, cracks and groundwater infiltration into the sewer main. The manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain Echologics, LLC was hired by the City to perform a non-invasive pipe condition assessment on the watermain within the project area, and staff has reviewed historical break data to determine the extent of improvements needed. Portions of the existing watermain will be replaced using a combination of pipebursting and open cut methods, and associated water services will also be replaced. All gate valves and fire hydrants within the project area will be replaced and, if needed, additional hydrants will be installed to meet current public safety standards. The new fire hydrants will include the Storz nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. As part of the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan, staff plans to engage property owners who have unsealed private wells and encourage them to have the wells properly sealed. Storm Sewer Based on existing conditions and the scope of utility work, spot replacement of concrete curb and gutter will be performed in the majority of the project area. New curb and gutter will be installed on Bello Drive, Shawnee Circle and Overholt pass to provide a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater. The storm sewer network will have modifications to resolve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. The modeled flood risk along the Braemar Branch of Nine Mile Creek is regional in nature and influencing the flood elevation cannot be addressed within the scope of this project. The STS-406 study evaluated several options to address the areas of flood inundation near Sally Lane and Paiute Pass: Option 1: Install new storm sewer pipes to drain the backyard depression area Option 2: Increase the capacity of existing storm sewer pipes between Sally Lane and the Braemar Branch from 24” to 36” and 24” to 48” Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 17 Option 3: Construct two surface overflow channels between residential properties along Sally Lane to convey stormwater from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch. Staff will engage in further discussions with Barr Engineering to evaluate the feasibility of storm sewer improvements for the Sally Lane and Paiute Pass area, as well as the other areas of flood inundation identified within the project limits. Staff will also communicate and coordinate with adjacent property owners prior to selecting an improvement method. Private Utilities Staff met with representatives of several private utility companies on October 12, 2018 to notify them of the proposed 2019 reconstruction projects and discuss preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. Currently, the City does not have a standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved. Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies. The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections; therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting. RIGHT-OF-WAY /EASEMENTS: Existing right-of-way in this neighborhood varies from 40.5’ to 60’. It is anticipated that the majority of this project can be constructed within existing ROW; temporary construction easements may be required for retaining wall improvements. Many properties have vegetation, boulders or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A portion of these landscape items will interfere with the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary work. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $2,698,616 (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway $ 1,097,956 Retaining Walls $ 275,000 Roadway Total: $ 1,372,956 Special Assessments Sanitary Sewer $ 226,800 Watermain $ 459,270 Storm Sewer $ 639,590 Utility Total: $ 1,325,660 City Utility Funds Project Total: $ 2,698,616 Table 2: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statues. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 18 Policy, there are 88.01 residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Indian Trails B/C project area. The estimated assessment per REU is $15,600 ($12,475 per REU for roadway improvements and $3,125 per REU for retaining wall improvements) (see Figure 8). Figure 8: Preliminary Assessment Map The formulas for calculating REUs are described below: Previously Assessed Single-Family Residential Lots 7142 Valley View Road; 1 REU - 1 REU (previously assessed for Valley View Road in 2015) = 0 REU 7025 and 7028 Sally Lane; 7033 Comanche Court; 1 REU - 0.33 REU (previously assessed for Valley View Road in 2015) = 0.67 REU Engineering Study Indian Trails B/C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-452 November 26, 2018 19 Single-Family Residential Corner Lots 17, 33 and 42 Bello Drive; 6809 Sally Lane; 6908 and 6912 Shawnee Circle; = 0.5 REU (partial access off Dakota Trail, Sally Lane and Valley View Road) All other properties are single-family residential located entirely within the project area and will be subjected to an assessment of 1 REU. The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix M. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the past and future tasks to be performed related to the project: Neighborhood Open House (all 2019/2020 projects) September 25, 2017 Neighborhood Informational Meeting (all 2019 projects) August 13, 2018 ETC Engineering Study Review October 25, 2018 Receive Engineering Study December 4, 2018 Public Improvement Hearing December 10, 2018 Bid Opening March/April 2019 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2019 Complete Construction Fall 2019 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2020 RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2019 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Indian Trails B/C neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Traffic and Crash Data B. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks E. Streetlights and Signs F. Living Streets Plan G. STS-406 Improvement Project Report H. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes I. Resident Questionnaire J. Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials K. Correspondence from Residents L. Gale-Tec Retaining Wall Report M. Preliminary Assessment Roll APPENDIX A Traffic and Crash Data Indian Trails B/C Traffic and Crash Data Traffic Data Location Description Year Average Daily Traffic 85th % Speed, mph 1 Sally Ln 2018 446 29.3 2 Paiute Dr 2018 117 20.2 Crash Data Location Severity Year Month Time A Property Damage - Collision with Motor Vehicle 2008 April 8:13 a.m. Property Damage - Collision with Sign Pole 2007 February 1:26 a.m. Property Damage – Collision with Building/Wall 2006 July 12:38 a.m. APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Braemar Golf Course Bredesen Park Rosland Park Pamela Park Lewis Park Highlands Park Walnut Ridge Park Todd Park Garden Park Heights Park Van Valkenburg Park Fred Richards Golf Course Creek Valley Park Lake Edina Park Krahl Hill Normandale Park Weber Field Park Arneson Acres Park Countryside Park Alden Park Utley Park Yorktown Park Wooddale Park Arden Park York Park Cornelia Park Strachauer Park Fox MeadowPark Edinborough Park KojetinPark McGuirePark BirchcrestPark SherwoodPark Melody LakePark Williams Park ChowenPark St. John'sPark TingdalePark BrowndalePark GrandviewSquare FrankTupa Park Courtney Fields ?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y Mud Lake )y ?ÞA@ ?úA@ LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake Minnehaha Creek N in e Mi le Cree k Nine Mile Creek Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVEFRANCE AVE SXERXES AVE SCAHILL RD70TH ST W 66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W GLEASON RD70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W / Engineering DeptMay 2018 Pedestrian Facilities Proposed FacilitiesExisting Facilities Existing Sidewalk Existing Park Pathway Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail New Primary Sidewalk New Secondary Sidewalk New Shared Use Path Upgrade to Shared Use Path Twin Loops Facility APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map ?ÞA@ )y ?úA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake AldenPark VanValkenburgPark FoxMeadowPark HighlandsPark Todd Park Weber FieldParkKojetinPark BrowndalePark WooddaleParkWilliamsParkUtleyPark FrankTupaPark SherwoodPark ArdenPark YorkPark ChowenPark PamelaParkSt JohnsPark StrachauerPark RoslandPark BristolParkCorneliaPark ArnesonAcresPark LakeEdinaParkFred RichardsGolf Course YorktownPark EdinboroughPark GardenPark MelodyLakePark TingdalePark CountrysidePark BredesenPark WalnutRidgePark KrahlHill Creek Valley Park HeightsPark NormandalePark McGuirePark LewisParkBraemar Park and Golf Course(Courtney Fields) Minnehaha Creek Ni ne M ile C re e k Nine Mile Creek Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBlake RdVernon AveFrance Ave SXerxes Ave SCahill Rd70th St W Interlachen Blvd Maloney Ave 4 4 th S t W 50th St W 54th St W 58th St W Gleason Rd70th St W 76th St W Dewey Hill Rd Valley View Rd Valley View Rd Minnesota Dr78th St W Wooddale AveTracy AveParklawn AveConcord AveBenton Ave Gle a s o n R dMalibu RdGreen Farms RdMcCauley Trl SMirror Lakes DrLincoln DrWashington AveDivision St Vernon AveGolf Ter Code AveWilryan AveNormandale RdWest Shore DrCornelia DrFrance Ave SYork Ave S77th St WOhms LnHilary Ln Olinger Blvd 66th St W Antrim Rd63rd St W Xerxes Ave S69th St W Bush Lake RdMetro Blvd66th St W 62nd St W Valley Ln Brookside Ave?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y 74th St W V alley View R dEngineering DeptMay 2018 / O:\Users\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Asbuilts.mxd Proposed Bicycle Facilities New Shared Use Path Upgrade to Shared Use Path Standard Bike Lane New Buffered Bike Lane Upgrade to Buffered Bike Lane Neighborhood Slow Street Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Twin Loops Facility APPENDIX D Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks 1 16 6915 6917 6505 6821 6907 6911 6725 14 78 42 7137 7108 17 33 25 6808 7100 6804 7135 6817 6813 12 7104 6817 6900 6940 6805 6904 7133 6909 7021 6905 6908 7005-07 6912 6906 6915 7009-11 6916 6800 6801 6825 6829 7013-15 6901 7021-23 6920 6817 6901 6509 6919 7013 6910 6815 6821 6808 7009 6833 6813 6913 7017 6905 6812 6612 6904 6609 6909 6809 6804 6800 6837 6813 6921 7033 6504 7136 7132 6608 6905 7005 7033 6908 6713 7143 6500 6717 7149 6804 6801 6604 6820 6800 6709 6712 6701 6808 6804 6816 6909 6832 6824 6916 7013 7025 7141 7001 7147 6901 6828 7037 6917 6716 7142 6913 6841 6845 6700 6800 6705 7138 6902 6708 7145 6709 7028 7021 6809 7140 6809 6704 6921 6836 6914 7005 6912 6625 7136 7017 7025 6812 6801 7134 6805 7029 6808 66136617662170037000 6805 7009 7024 7016 7 1 4 4 6900 7019 7004 7020 7008 6923 7017 7012 6812 7001 7 1 4 6 6903 70257027 COMANCHE CTSHAW NEE CIRPAIUTE CIR SALLY LNPAIUTE DRBELLO DR PROJECT LIMITS DAKOTA TRLVALLEY VIEW RDOVERHOLT PASSP A I U T E P A S S PAIUTE DR V A L L E Y V IE W R D SIOUX TRL SALLY LNIR O Q U O IS C IR +¡ / Engineering DeptOctober 2018 Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksIndian Trails B and C NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-452 and BA-453CITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPORA T E D1888 ,e Sewer BlocksWatermain Breaks APPENDIX E Streetlights and Signs 1 16 6915 6917 6505 6821 6907 6911 6725 14 78 42 7137 7108 17 33 25 6808 7100 6804 7135 6817 6813 12 7104 6817 6900 6940 6805 6904 7133 6909 7021 6905 6908 7005-07 6912 6906 6915 7009-11 6916 6800 6801 6825 6829 7013-15 6901 7021-23 6920 6817 6901 6509 6919 7013 6910 6815 6821 6808 7009 6833 6813 6913 7017 6905 6812 6612 6904 6609 6909 6809 6804 6800 6837 6813 6921 7033 6504 7136 7132 6608 6905 7005 7033 6908 6713 7143 6500 6717 7149 6804 6801 6604 6820 6800 6709 6712 6701 6808 6804 6816 6909 6832 6824 6916 7013 7025 7141 7001 7147 6901 6828 7037 6917 6716 7142 6913 6841 6845 6700 6800 6705 7138 6902 6708 7145 6709 7028 7021 6809 7140 6809 6704 6921 6836 6914 7005 6912 6625 7136 7017 7025 6812 6801 7134 6805 7029 6808 66136617662170037000 6805 7009 7024 7016 7 1 4 4 6900 7019 7004 7020 7008 6923 7017 7012 6812 7001 7 1 4 6 6903 70257027 COMANCHE CTSHAW NEE CIRPAIUTE CIR SALLY LNPAIUTE DRBELLO DR PROJECT LIMITS DAKOTA TRLVALLEY VIEW RDOVERHOLT PASSP A I U T E P AS S PAIUTE DR V A L L E Y V IE W R D SIOUX TRL SALLY LNIR O Q U O IS C IR +¡ Xcel EnergyTraditionalFiberglass Xcel EnergyTraditionalFiberglass Xcel EnergyTraditionalFiberglass Xcel EnergyTraditionalFiberglass /Engineering DeptJuly 2018 StreetlightsIndian Trails B and C NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-452 and BA-453CITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPORA T E D 1888 ,e Xcel EnergyCobrahead Drop LenseWood Round Xcel EnergyCobrahead Drop LenseWood Round !"$ !"$89:z 89:z!"$ 1 16 6915 6917 6505 6821 6907 6911 6725 14 78 42 7137 7108 17 33 25 6808 7100 6804 7135 6817 6813 12 7104 6817 6900 6940 6805 6904 7133 6909 7021 6905 6908 7005-07 6912 6906 6915 7009-11 6916 6800 6801 6825 6829 7013-15 6901 7021-23 6920 6817 6901 6509 6919 7013 6910 6815 6821 6808 7009 6833 6813 6913 7017 6905 6812 6612 6904 6609 6909 6809 6804 6800 6837 6813 6921 7033 6504 7136 7132 6608 6905 7005 7033 6908 6713 7143 6500 6717 7149 6804 6801 6604 6820 6800 6709 6712 6701 6808 6804 6816 6909 6832 6824 6916 7013 7025 7141 7001 7147 6901 6828 7037 6917 6716 7142 6913 6841 6845 6700 6800 6705 7138 6902 6708 7145 6709 7028 7021 6809 7140 6809 6704 6921 6836 6914 7005 6912 6625 7136 7017 7025 6812 6801 7134 6805 7029 6808 66136617662170037000 6805 7009 7024 7016 7 1 4 4 6900 7019 7004 7020 7008 6923 7017 7012 6812 7001 7 1 4 6 6903 70257027 COMANCHE CTSHAW NEE CIRPAIUTE CIR SALLY LNPAIUTE DRBELLO DR PROJECT LIMITS DAKOTA TRLVALLEY VIEW RDOVERHOLT PASSP A IUT E P A SS PAIUTE DR V A L L E Y V IE W R D SIOUX TRL SALLY LNIR O Q U O IS C IR +¡ /Engineering DeptJuly 2018 SignsIndian Trails B and C NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-452 and BA-453CITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPORA T E D 1888 ,e Signs D3-X1 Neighbors Home Watch !"$R1-1 89:z W14-1 APPENDIX F Living Streets Plan Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy APPENDIX G STS-406 Improvement Project Report STS-406 Improvement Project Part 2: Project Areas 4 and 5 Prepared for City of Edina May 28, 2014 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: 952.832.2600 Fax: 952.832.2601 1.0 Project Background The City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (December 2011) was developed to address current and future stormwater issues, especially those related to future development and redevelopment. The plan addresses stormwater runoff management and flood control, water quality management, and wetlands protection through establishment of stormwater planning policies and recommendations. This plan serves as a master plan for the City’s water resources management and storm drainage system improvements. One of the goals of the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (CWRMP) is to provide stormwater runoff management and flood control. The CWRMP establishes design criteria for the City’s preferred level of service for stormwater management and level of protection from flooding provided to residents of the city. These design criteria serve as a target for the City as redevelopment occurs and infrastructure improvements are considered. Another goal of the CWRMP is to provide water quality management for the water bodies throughout the city. Water quality management policies and design standards have also been established to protect the water quality of the waterbodies within the city. The CWRMP identifies several areas throughout the city where the desired 100-year level of flood protection may not currently be provided, based on results of the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analyses conducted as part of the CWRMP development. Since identification of these areas, the City has been evaluating flood improvement options on a case-by-case basis, in conjunction with nearby street reconstruction or other improvement projects. The STS-406 Improvement Project includes a detailed evaluation of several areas with high flood potential that correspond to anticipated street reconstruction projects within the upcoming 5 years. This report summarizes our flood protection analyses and conclusions for the following project areas within the STS-406 Improvement Project: (1) Project Area 4 – Cahill Road and Dewey Hill Road (2) Project Area 5 – Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Locations of Project Areas 4 and 5 are shown in Figure 1-1. All elevations included in this report reflect Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevations in feet using the NGVD 29 vertical datum. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 1 2.0 Project Approach 2.1 Flood Protection Detailed hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the flood areas within Project Areas 4 and 5 was conducted using the XP-SWMM models that were originally developed in 2003 as part of the CWRMP. Updates made to the models as part of this project are described below and within the subsequent sections of this report. 2.1.1 Changes to Published Precipitation Depths In 2013, NOAA’s National Weather Service (NWS) published new precipitation frequency estimates (“Atlas 14”) for the state of Minnesota and other Midwestern states. The Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates, which are the estimated rainfall depths for various rainfall durations and exceedance probabilities, replace the precipitation estimates published in Technical Paper No. 40 Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States (“TP 40”). The Atlas 14 rainfall frequency estimates indicate a significant increase in the depth of the 50-year and 100-year frequency rainfall events (i.e., rainfall events with exceedance probabilities of 2% and 1%, respectively) across Minnesota and neighboring states, as compared with TP 40 estimates. For the Minneapolis/St. Paul area, the increases in 24-hour duration precipitation depths over TP 40 are as high 25% (Figure 2-1). These precipitation depth increases are of concern, as they can have serious implications for how stormwater systems are designed and managed. Figure 2-1 Atlas 14 percent of change in precipitation depth for the 24-hour duration storm, as compared to TP 40 The hydrologic and hydraulic modeling conducted for and summarized in the CWRMP used a 24-hour rainfall depth of 6.0 inches based on TP 40, and the SCS Type II nested distribution. For this project, the rainfall depths used in the models were updated based on Atlas 14 precipitation estimates for Edina (Table 2-1). A nested rainfall distribution was developed using precipitation frequency estimates for Edina (Coordinates: 44.8716, -93.3762). The depth-duration data were downloaded from NOAA’s Precipitation Frequency Data Server (PFDS) at http://dipper.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/. Nested distributions for selected P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 2 recurrence intervals events were created by using the Frequency Storm utility found in the meteorological modeling component of HEC-HMS to produce 24-hour hyetographs with 5-minute intervals. Flood frequency data is often also described in terms of a percentage of risk, or annual exceedance probability. For example, the 100-year frequency flood inundation area represents an area that has a 1 percent chance of flooding (1-percent-annual chance flood) for any given year. Structures located within the 1-percent-annual chance flood inundation area have a 26 percent chance of flooding during the life of a standard 30-year mortgage. Table 2-1 24-hour duration rainfall depths using NOAA Atlas 14 for Edina, MN for a range of storm recurrence intervals Storm Recurrence Interval 24-hour Rainfall Depth (inches) Annual Exceedance Probability1 1-year 2.5 100% 2-year 2.9 50% 10-year 4.3 10% 25-year 5.4 4% 50-year 6.4 2% 100-year 7.5 1% 1 Annual Exceedance Probability refers to the percent chance of occurrence in any given year 2.1.2 Updated Elevation Data For each of the study areas, City staff conducted a topographic field survey of the flood inundation areas within the targeted subwatersheds. The topographic survey data was combined with 2011 LiDAR elevation data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) to refine the elevation/storage relationships used in the modeling analyses. The City’s survey also included low entry elevations for structures adjacent to the flood inundation areas within the targeted subwatersheds. The low entry elevations were used to define the flood improvement target elevations. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 3 4.0 Project Area 5—Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Project Area 5 encompasses the area that drains to the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass which includes Nine Mile South Branch Catchments NMSB_70, _83, and _84 (Figure 1-1). The stormwater model for this area indicates potential flooding at this intersection as well as in a backyard depression area located at 7005 and 7009 Sally Lane. The City provided a detailed topographic survey of this intersection and backyard depression area, allowing available storage to be quantified more accurately, low entry elevations to be determined for the structures adjacent to the low areas, and overflow elevations between the street and nearby low areas to be identified. 4.1 Problem Description Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of Project Area 5 suggests that flooding will occur in the low area surrounding the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass (NMSB_83 and _84) and the backyard depression area behind 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane (NMSB_70) during a 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event. The low area at the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass is currently drained by two storm sewer pipes that flow westward, discharging to the drainageway behind the homes on the west side of Sally Lane (Braemar Branch of Nine Mile Creek). The backyard depression area is currently drained by a storm sewer pipe that ties into the existing system at Sally Lane and Paiute Pass. The flooding in these areas appears to be primarily a result of localized storm sewer capacity limitations. 4.1.1 Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Intersection (NMSB_83, NMSB_84) The storm sewer system at the Sally Lane and Paiute Pass intersection collects stormwater from a total drainage area of approximately 27 acres. The existing system discharges into the Braemar Branch via two 24-inch pipes. During the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event, the Paiute Pass/Sally Lane intersection is inundated with stormwater and ponding occurs. Based on the topographic survey information, ponding will occur in this intersection and onto nearby properties. Two overland flow paths have been identified where water will flow westward to the Braemar Branch. The north overland flow path conveys water between properties 6836 and 7000 Sally Lane. The south overland flow path conveys water between 7000 and 7004 Sally Lane. The upstream invert for the north overland flow path is 862.0 feet and the upstream invert for the south overland flow path is 861.3 feet. The surveyed low entry elevations in this area are 861.6 feet, 861.5 feet, and 862.0 feet at 7000, 7004, and 6845 Sally Lane, respectively. 4.1.2 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane Backyard Depression Area (NMSB_70) A backyard depression area exists behind the homes along Sally Lane and Paiute Pass. A 12-inch piped outlet exists from this area, draining northward and connecting to the system along Paiute Pass. During large rainfall events such as the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event, the piped outlet does not provide sufficient capacity, and ponding will occur. Two overland flow paths exist which convey flow westward to Sally Lane. The north overland flow path conveys water between properties 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane. The south overland flow path conveys water between 7013 and 7017 Sally Lane. The upstream invert for the north overland flow path is 863.0 feet and the upstream invert for the south overland flow path is 862.9 P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 11 feet. Based on the topographic survey information, the low entry elevations in this area are 862.9 feet and 863.1 feet at 7009 and 7005 Sally Lane, respectively. 4.2 Model Updates The XP-SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model for Project Area 5 was updated to reflect new rainfall depths as defined by NOAA Atlas 14. Because of the increase in rainfall depths, additional surface overflows were added to the model within the Project Area 5 study area, as needed. The City provided topographic survey at the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass, as well as the Sally Lane backyard depression area. This information was used in conjunction with the MNDNR’s 2011 LiDAR elevation dataset to update the stage-storage relationships in the model for subwatersheds within the Project Area 5 study area. The storm sewer information in the model was also updated based on a survey conducted by the City. 4.3 Existing Conditions Flooding Table 4-1 summarizes the predicted 100-year, 24-hour water surface elevations under existing conditions for the subwatersheds within the Project Area 5 study. The 100-year flood elevation for the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass is 862.0 (subwatersheds NMSB_83 and NMSB_84), which exceeds the low entry elevation of three structures (6845, 7000, and 7004 Sally Lane). The 100-year flood elevation for the backyard depression area (subwatershed NMSB_70) is 863.2 feet, which exceeds the surveyed low entry elevation of two structures (7005 and 7009 Sally Lane). The inundation areas corresponding to these two flood elevations are shown in Figure 4-1. Table 4-1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at the corresponding elevation Flooding Area Water Surface Elevation1, 100-year, 24-hour Rainfall Recurrence Interval Lowest Low Entry Elevation Intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass (NMSB_83 and _84) 862.0 (3) 861.52 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane Backyard Depression Area (NMSB_70) 863.2 (2) 862.93 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths 2 7004 Sally Lane 3 7009 Sally Lane 4.4 Improvement Options Three flood improvement options were evaluated to reduce flood risk in the low area at Sally Lane and Paiute Pass and the backyard depression area. These three options are being considered separately for the purpose of identifying component costs, but the final alternative will be a combination of either Option A with Option B or Option A with Option C. The three options include: P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 12 Option A: Installation of a 24-inch diameter corrugated polyethylene storm sewer pipe to drain the backyard area behind homes on the south side of Paiute Pass and the east side of Sally Lane. The proposed 930 lineal feet of pipe would discharge to the Braemar Branch just downstream of the Valley View Road crossing. Option B: Increasing the capacity of the existing north outfall pipe from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch by replacing the existing 24-inch diameter CMP with a 36-inch diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe. In addition, increasing the capacity of the existing south outfall pipe from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch by replacing the existing 24-inch diameter CMP with a 48-inch diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe. Option C: Constructing two gravity overflow channels to convey overland flow from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch. One proposed overflow channel is to be located between 6836 Sally Lane and 7000 Sally Lane. The second overflow channel is to be located between 7000 Sally Lane and 7004 Sally Lane. The overflow channels will be controlled positive overflow paths which will ensure the homes are protected from flood waters and not altered in the future by private property owners. 4.4.1 Option A: Install Additional Pipe from Backyard Depression Area As described in Figure 4-2 and Figure 4-3, Option A encompasses installation of 930 lineal feet of 24-inch diameter corrugated polyethylene storm sewer pipe from the backyard area south and east of Paiute Pass and Sally Lane. The existing pipe which directs runoff to the north will continue to service the backyard area. The proposed pipe exits the existing catch basin in the backyard area and runs south before it turns 90 degrees to the west and passes between 7009 Sally Lane and 7013 Sally Lane. The pipe then runs to the south under Sally Lane, crosses Valley View Road, and discharges into the Braemar Branch downstream of the culvert crossing with Valley View Road. An easement and careful coordination with the affected property owners will be required for the properties crossed by this new pipe. Throughout this analysis, careful consideration was given to preventing adverse downstream impacts as a result of proposed flood improvements. The proposed pipe from the backyard area discharges to the Braemar Branch downstream of Valley View Road, which is a modification to current drainage patterns. To ensure that installation of the new pipe would not cause flood concerns downstream of Valley View Road, the proposed pipe was added to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District’s XP-SWMM model and run for the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event. Model results indicate a negligible change in maximum surface water elevation downstream of Valley View Road. The City may wish to consider further optimization of Option A (upsizing the proposed pipe and extending it northward along Sally Lane- described in more detail in Section 4.4.4) to collect runoff from the low intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass. While not evaluated in detail as part of this analysis, this option may have the potential to reduce or eliminate the need for additional pipe capacity as outlined in Option B. Further analysis as part of final design would be required to evaluate detailed design considerations and assess cost implications and potential downstream impacts of more significant drainage pattern modifications. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 13 4.4.2 Option B: Increase Capacity of Sally Lane Storm Sewer As described in Figure 4-2, Option B includes increasing the capacity of the north outfall pipe from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch by replacing the 24-inch pipe with a 36-inch diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe. The capacity of the south outfall pipe from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch will also be increased by replacing the 24-inch pipe with a 48-inch diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe. The pipes will follow their existing alignment between 6836 and 7000 Sally Lane. The available installation space will be tight in this area and will require careful coordination with the contractor and the homeowners. The current easement may need to be widened due to the increased size of these pipes. Careful coordination and communication with the property owners affected by this option will be necessary. 4.4.3 Option C: Construct Surface Overflow Channels from Sally Lane As described in Figure 4-3, Option C includes construction of two gravity surface overflow channels from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch. The northern channel having an upstream invert of 860.1 feet will pass between 6836 Sally Lane and 7000 Sally Lane. The southern channel will pass between 7000 Sally Lane and 7004 Sally Lane and will have an upstream invert of 860.3 feet. Both of the channels are being proposed with vertical retaining walls and riprap bottoms due to the high design flows and velocities associated with the 100 year, 24-hour rainfall event and the narrow space available between the homes. The easement located between 6836 Sally Lane and 7000 Sally Lane may need to be widened for the north overflow channel. The south overflow will require the creation of an easement between 7000 and 7004 Sally Lane. Careful coordination and communication with the property owners affected by this option will be necessary. 4.4.4 Flood Benefits Table 4-2 summarizes the water surface elevations in the two low areas near the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass for the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event. The number of dwellings impacted for each scenario is also included in Table 4-2. Option A lowers the 100-year maximum water surface elevation below the low entry elevations at 7005 and 7009 Sally Lane. Inundation will still occur in the backyard area during the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event; however, it should not directly impact any structures. Options B and C provide similar benefits, with respect to both the reduction in the maximum water surface elevation and the number of dwellings protected. Implementing either Option B or C would result in lowering the maximum water surface elevation below the low entry elevations of the three impacted dwellings (6845, 7000, and 7004 Sally Lane). There will still be isolated flooding on the street during the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event; however, it should not directly impact any structures. None of the three improvement options evaluated have an impact on the 100-year flood elevation in the Braemar Branch. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 14 As described in Section 4.4.1, a potential alternative to combining Options A and B would be to upsize and extend the Option A pipe northward along Sally Lane to collect additional flow from the low area at Sally Lane and Paiute Pass and reduce or eliminate the need for additional pipe capacity as outlined in Option B. This option would require installation of a larger and longer pipe that would convey flow from the intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass south to the downstream side of Valley View Road. An increased depth of excavation along Sally Lane would be required to allow for tie-in of the low area of the Sally Lane and Paiute Pass intersection. Depth of cover near the low area, a less than desirable pipe slope along Sally Lane (less than 0.5%), and potential adverse downstream impacts due to redirection of significantly higher flows may also pose design concerns and/or challenges. Table 4-2 100-year, 24-hour maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions and the number of dwellings (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation Flooding Area Existing Conditions1 Option A1 (2-ft Dia. Pipe to Braemar Branch) Option B1 (Increased Outflow Pipes) Option C1 (Constructed Overflows) Intersection of Sally Lane and Paiute Pass (NMSB_83 and _84) 862.0 (3) NA 861.3 (0) 861.4 (0) 7009 and 7013 Sally Lane Backyard Depression Area (NMSB_70) 863.2 (2) 862.2 (0) NA NA 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths Table 4-3 summarizes the 100-year, 24-hour peak discharge rates through the proposed storm sewer pipes and overflows for Options A, B, and C. Table 4-3 100-year, 24-hour peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Sally Lane improvement Options A, B, and C 24-hour Storm Recurrence Interval Option A (2-ft Pipe to Braemar Branch) Option B (North Outflow Pipe) Option B (South Outflow Pipe) Option C (North Overflow) Option C (South Overflow) 100-year 20 cfs 51 cfs 103 cfs 76 cfs 84 cfs 4.4.5 Engineer’s Opinions of Probable Costs Planning level engineer’s opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, and C. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 4-4, are based on our experience on similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning-level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. The cost associated with the purchase of easements or the widening of existing easements has not been included in this estimate. See Appendix B for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, and C. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 15 Table 4-4 Estimated costs for Sally Lane and Paiute Pass (Project Area 5) improvement Options A, B, and C Improvement Option Estimated Cost1 Option A: 24” RCP draining Sally Lane backyard depression area to existing storm sewer $210,000 Option B: increasing the pipe sizes for the north and south outfalls from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch of Nine Mile Creek $150,000 Option C: construction of two overflow channels from Sally Lane to the Braemar Branch of Nine Mile Creek $160,000 Combined Option A +B $360,000 Combined Option A + C $370,000 1 Costs rounded up to the nearest $10,000. 4.4.6 Water Quality Benefits Although flood risk reduction was the primary objective of this analysis, opportunities to implement water quality improvements within the study area were also considered. Due to the limited availability of undeveloped or publicly-owned land within the direct study area, construction of water quality BMPs is difficult. However, we recommend that the City consider installation of rainwater gardens in the City right- of-way or installation of sump manholes with SAFL Baffles (or other underground hydrodynamic treatment structures) to provide opportunity for settling of sediment prior to discharge of stormwater to the Braemar Branch. Although somewhat beyond the study area, a wooded area at the north end of the Braemar Branch was identified as a potential site for stormwater management. The low area (approximately 2.4 acres), which is located west of 6800 through 6812 Sally Lane and south of Sioux Trail in subwatershed NMSB_77, receives stormwater from portions of Edina and Eden Prairie. Review of the National Wetland Inventory indicates that the low area may not be classified as a wetland. The City may want to consider this site for future stormwater management efforts given the high proportion of previously untreated flows to this location. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 4-5\Project Areas 4 and 5 Final Report.docx 16 ^_ ^_ Project Area 4 - Cahill and Dewey Hill Road Project Area 5 - Sally Lane and Paiute Pass §¨¦494 £¤169 £¤169 62 100 7 100 7 62 Figure 1-1 PROJECT STUDY AREAS Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-05-28 08:36 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA4_5\Figure 1-1 - Project Study Areas.mxd User: jrv 0 2,500 5,000Feet !;N Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 ^_Project Areas City of Edina Boundary 0 100 200Feet Figure 4-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS100-YEAR INUNDATIONProject Area 5 -Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-05-28 08:42 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA4_5\Figure 4-1 - Existing Conditions 100-Year Inundation, Project Area 5 - Sally Lane and Paiute Pass.mxd User: jrv !>Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Surface Overflow Existing Storm Sewer100-Year 24-Hour EventInundation Area* Subwatersheds Parcels !;N Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). V a lle y V ie w R o a d £¤169 Paiute DrCommanche CourtP a iu te P a s s Sally LaneV a lle y V ie w R dMccauley Trail6908 6910 6912 6914 69166604 66086612 6824 6828 6832 6833 6837 6841 68456836 6913 6909 24 6921 6923 6917 6919 7146 7144 7142 7005 7009 7013 6625 6621 6617 6613 7017 7143 7141 7138 7136 7134 7132 24 6609 7021 7025 7029 7033 7137 7149 7147 7145 24 7001 7005 7009 7013 7017 7021 7025 7000 7004 7008 7012 7016 7020 7024 7028 7013 7009 7005 7021 24 7003 7001 7025 7027 7017 7019 NMSB_75 NMSB_72 NMSB_72 NMSB_70 NMSB_42 NMSB_43 NMSB_65 NMSB_76 NMSB_79 NMSB_49 NMSB_81 NMSB_71 NMSB_84 NMSB_83 NMSB_46 NMSB_52 NMSB_69 NMSB_4 Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html).Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 0 100 200Feet Figure 4-2 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTOPTIONS A AND BProject Area 5 -Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-05-28 08:43 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA4_5\Figure 4-2 - Proposed Improvement Option A and B, Project Area 5 - Sally Lane and Paiute Pass.mxd User: jrv !>Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Existing Storm SewerOption A and B:100-Year 24-Hour EventInundation Area*Option A: Proposed Storm Sewer (2' pipe) Option B: North Pipe (3' Pipe) Option B: South Pipe (4' Pipe) Subwatersheds Parcels !;N Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). !> !> !>!> !> !> !>!>!>!> !> !> !>!> !> !> !> !> !> !> !> !> !> !> !>!> V a l l e y V i e w R o a d £¤169 Paiute DrCommanche CourtP a iu te P a s s Sally LaneV alle y V i e w RdMccauley Trail6908 6910 6912 6914 69166604 66086612 6824 6828 6832 6833 6837 6841 68456836 6913 6909 24 6921 6923 6917 6919 7146 7144 7142 7005 7009 7013 6625 6621 6617 6613 7017 7143 7141 7138 7136 7134 7132 24 6609 7021 7025 7029 7033 7137 7149 7147 7145 24 7001 7005 7009 7013 7017 7021 7025 7000 7004 7008 7012 7016 7020 7024 7028 7013 7009 7005 7021 24 7003 7001 7025 7027 7017 7019 NMSB_75NMSB_72 NMSB_72 NMSB_70 NMSB_42 NMSB_43 NMSB_65 NMSB_76 NMSB_79 NMSB_49 NMSB_81 NMSB_71 NMSB_84 NMSB_83 NMSB_46 NMSB_52 NMSB_69 NMSB_4 Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html).Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 0 100 200Feet Figure 4-3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTOPTIONS A AND CProject Area 5 -Sally Lane and Paiute Pass Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-05-28 08:44 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA4_5\Figure 4-3 - Proposed Improvement Option A and C, Project Area 5 - Sally Lane and Paiute Pass.mxd User: jrv !>Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Existing Storm Sewer Option A and C:100-Year 24-Hour EventInundation Area* Option A: Proposed Storm Sewer (2' pipe) Option C: Overflow Channels Subwatersheds Parcels !;N Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). !> !> !>!> !> !> !>!>!>!> !> !> !>!> !> !> !> !> !> !> !> !> !> !> !>!> V a lle y V ie w R o a d £¤169 Paiute DrCommanche CourtP a iu te P a s s Sally LaneV alle y V i e w RdMccauley Trail6908 6910 6912 6914 69166604 66086612 6824 6828 6832 6833 6837 6841 68456836 6913 6909 24 6921 6923 6917 6919 7146 7144 7142 7005 7009 7013 6625 6621 6617 6613 7017 7143 7141 7138 7136 7134 7132 24 6609 7021 7025 7029 7033 7137 7149 7147 7145 24 7001 7005 7009 7013 7017 7021 7025 7000 7004 7008 7012 7016 7020 7024 7028 7013 7009 7005 7021 24 7003 7001 7025 7027 7017 7019 NMSB_75NMSB_72 NMSB_72 NMSB_70 NMSB_42 NMSB_43 NMSB_65 NMSB_76 NMSB_79 NMSB_49 NMSB_81 NMSB_71 NMSB_84 NMSB_83 NMSB_46 NMSB_52 NMSB_69 NMSB_4 Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html).Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 APPENDIX H Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room October 25, 2018 I. Reports/Recommendations A. 2019 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Draft Engineering Studies Assistant City Engineer, Aaron Ditzler, addressed the ETC’s questions and discussed the 2019 neighborhood reconstruction projects. The following comments were made: • Indian Trails o Assessments are REU’s divided by total cost. o Indian Trails B and C are being constructed together because they have similar pavement conditions. o The cul-de-sacs should be assessed separately. o The historical pictures are helpful. o The retaining wall should be paid for by the residents that will benefit from it. o Paiute Pass had a stormwater project completed in 2015 and the road was repaved then, why are we reconstructing this when the pavement is still new? TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Iyer, Surya 1 1 2 100% LaForce, Tom 1 1 2 100% Kane, Bocar 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Miranda, Lou 1 1 2 100% Olson, Larry 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Richman, Lori 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Ruthruff, Erik 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Scherer, Matthew 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 90% Veluvali, Shankar 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Emmanual Ayelomi (s) 1 1 2 100% Yeukai Zimbwa (s) 1 1 2 100% Jenny Ma (s) 1 1 1 1 1 5 50% Tessa Yeager (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 60% APPENDIX I Resident Questionnaire 21.62%8 78.38%29 Q1 Does your property have drainage issues the City should know about?Examples: History of flooding/standing water, grading, backyard drain, nuisance sump pump, etc. Answered: 37 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 37 #PLEASE COMMENT ON THE TYPES PROBLEMS YOU HAVE:DATE 1 We’ve added drain tile in our basement, French drain in the backyard. Since we’ve add the drain tile in the house basement. It’s been all dry. We really hope the beautiful stone walls that add such a unique character to the neighborhood can be maintained and left in place while adding a modest curb to the southern side of the street and/or a small curb in front of the stone wall. 8/14/2018 10:02 PM 2 We have a storm drain in our back yard but it has operated properly and has not flooded in the 27 years we have lived in the house. 7/28/2018 8:19 PM 3 not at the present time but did in the past due to other neighbors emptying pools and construction issues. hopefully resolved 7/4/2018 8:49 AM 4 swale behind us (technically owned by bello drive house I believe - ahas standing water at heavy rains/snow melts or when they pump the lake into it - which is a crazy thing IMHO 7/1/2018 12:54 PM 5 We live at the foothills of Indian Hills so their water drains down to our property. It could be a problem if some new project is not handled properly. 6/27/2018 1:48 PM 6 We have an area in the NW corner of our lot (front yard) that always collects standing water. Our entire basement flooded several years ago (we're a low laying lot on Sally Ln), but we have since installed a sump pump and have not had issues. 6/13/2018 6:32 AM 7 We get standing water in the backyard during a heavy rain.6/12/2018 11:58 AM 8 We have a backyard drain, but no problems with it since we moved in 14 years ago. I keep it clear of debris. We have no drainage issues. 6/11/2018 6:07 PM 9 During winter water builds up on your far end (North side) of the cul du sac 6/11/2018 5:28 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 1 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 56.76%21 32.43%12 10.81%4 Q2 How concerned are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? Answered: 37 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 37 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 2 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%16 100.00%16 Q3 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 16 Skipped: 21 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 People speed all along Dakota Trail 8/14/2018 2:54 PM 2 Valley View Road from Braemar up to high school 7/4/2018 8:49 AM 3 Paiute Drive to Paiute Pass 7/3/2018 11:16 AM 4 Paiute Drive & Paiute Pass 7/3/2018 11:14 AM 5 every inch of valley view; corner dakota trail & VV 7/1/2018 12:54 PM 6 cul de saq - and children playing 6/27/2018 1:48 PM 7 Dakota Trail 6/26/2018 5:12 PM 8 Sally Lane 6/20/2018 8:45 AM 9 6837 Sally Lane 6/17/2018 5:14 PM 10 sally lane, sally lane/west trail come together, sally lane & valley view 6/13/2018 11:17 AM 11 6841 Sally Lane 6/13/2018 6:32 AM 12 Sally Lane and Paiute 6/12/2018 11:58 AM 13 Along Sally Lane 6/12/2018 9:43 AM 14 Sally Lane 6/11/2018 9:22 PM 15 midway point Paiute Drive 6/11/2018 6:50 PM 16 Comanche Court 6/11/2018 5:28 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 If you walk along Dakota Trail cars speed and drive close to the edges which is wear walkers are.8/14/2018 2:54 PM 2 people jump the congested highways at rush hour and use this as a cutthrough 7/4/2018 8:49 AM 3 cars coming from P Drive to P Pass make a wide turn and do not stay in their lane.7/3/2018 11:16 AM 4 Cars will speed down Paiute Dr and they don't always make the turn onto Paiute Pass 7/3/2018 11:14 AM 5 take turn at vv & dakota trail too fast. end up crashing into retaining walls, fire hydrants, lawns etc. 2 kids hit on bikes there in past 2 years 7/1/2018 12:54 PM 6 neighborhood children playing 6/27/2018 1:48 PM 7 A lot of dog walkers go around the lake and without sidewalks on Dakota and the hills and curves, it is dangerous to walk. 6/26/2018 5:12 PM 8 The road is narrow and there are no sidewalks. Residents walking their dog or just walking/jogging need to do it on the road. Speed limit should be 20 MPH 6/20/2018 8:45 AM 9 Between Valley View/Sally intersection and the bend on Sally Lane - cars speed up during the straight section of Sally Lane 6/17/2018 5:14 PM 10 serveral blind curves and intersections, you can't see clearly and people drive too fast 6/13/2018 11:17 AM 11 Speed of cars in neighborhood with lots of kids; standing water in NW corner (see above).6/13/2018 6:32 AM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 3 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 12 People go too fast on Sally 6/12/2018 11:58 AM 13 Feeder street to the neighborhood and drivers sometimes do not drive with caution.6/12/2018 9:43 AM 14 Speeding vehicles 6/11/2018 9:22 PM 15 cars barrel up the hill and go over speed limit 6/11/2018 6:50 PM 16 People drive into the cul du sac to turn around 6/11/2018 5:28 PM 4 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 88.89%32 5.56%2 5.56%2 Q4 How concerned are you with the volume of traffic or the number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? Answered: 36 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 36 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 5 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%4 100.00%4 Q5 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 4 Skipped: 33 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Valley View Road 7/4/2018 8:49 AM 2 valley view 7/1/2018 12:55 PM 3 cul ds saq street 6/27/2018 1:50 PM 4 Valley View and Sally Lane 6/17/2018 5:15 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 see #3 7/4/2018 8:49 AM 2 backed up from stop sign at antrim all the way past bello drive 7/1/2018 12:55 PM 3 there is no parking on Valley View so trucks have to park on our street with limited parking 6/27/2018 1:50 PM 4 Both are used as pass through streets 6/17/2018 5:15 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 6 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 60.00%21 28.57%10 11.43%4 Q6 How concerned are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Examples of poor motorist behavior include speeding, rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively.) Answered: 35 Skipped: 2 TOTAL 35 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 7 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%13 92.31%12 Q7 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 13 Skipped: 24 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 I'm slightly concerned--Dakota Trail near Shawnee and Valley View 8/14/2018 2:54 PM 2 Valley View Rd and McCauley Trail 7/5/2018 1:35 PM 3 see #3 7/4/2018 8:49 AM 4 high school down hill 7/1/2018 12:55 PM 5 McCauley Trail and Valley View Road 6/27/2018 9:06 PM 6 Dakota Trail. See my answer to #2.6/26/2018 5:13 PM 7 Valley View and McCauley Trail Intersection 6/20/2018 8:59 PM 8 Valley View/Sally Lane intersection; Paiute/Sally intersection and Sally Lane 6/17/2018 5:18 PM 9 sally lane and sally lane/west trail intersection 6/13/2018 11:19 AM 10 Rolling through stop signs and speeding on Valley View and through Braemar Park 6/12/2018 1:00 PM 11 Sally Ln 6/11/2018 9:23 PM 12 Valley View Road and McCauley Trail 6/11/2018 6:51 PM 13 Again, some people drive fast into the cul du sac, sometimes do a doughnut and drive back out on to Valley View 6/11/2018 5:30 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 People speed all along Dakota Trail--lots of curves, driving too close to the edges. I notice near Shawnee and Valley View because that is where I live nearby. But peole speed the whole length of Dakota Trail. 8/14/2018 2:54 PM 2 drivers routinely blow through the stop signs at this intersection, particularly northbound.7/5/2018 1:35 PM 3 see #3 7/4/2018 8:49 AM 4 snmall children, dark, curvy roads 7/1/2018 12:55 PM 5 Most drivers either don't attempt to stop or they just slow down. Few stop at all.6/27/2018 9:06 PM 6 People ignore stop signs and drive right past 6/20/2018 8:59 PM 7 Valley View/Sall Lane intersection - hard visibility when pulling out of Sally Lane and heading east on Valley View; Paiute/Sally Lane - drivers coming off of Paiute don’t stop at stop sign, they roll through it; Sally Lane - Hugh speeds 6/17/2018 5:18 PM 8 driving too fast on curves with poor visibility 6/13/2018 11:19 AM 9 safety 6/12/2018 1:00 PM 10 Speeding 6/11/2018 9:23 PM 11 Failure to stop at Stop Sign REGULARY 6/11/2018 6:51 PM 12 We have children on the street 6/11/2018 5:30 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 8 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 30.00%6 0.00%0 70.00%14 Q8 In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Answered: 20 Skipped: 17 TOTAL 20 Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or running 9 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 54.55%18 45.45%15 Q9 Do you feel that any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? Answered: 33 Skipped: 4 TOTAL 33 #IF YES, WHICH INTERSECTION?DATE 1 Sally Lane & Valley View Rd 7/28/2018 8:21 PM 2 Valley View Rd and Sally Lane 7/5/2018 1:37 PM 3 Valley View Road onto Dakota Trail 7/4/2018 8:50 AM 4 McCauley and Valley View; Sally Lane and Valley View (from the westside)7/3/2018 11:57 AM 5 Sally Lane and Valley View Rd 7/3/2018 11:17 AM 6 Sally Lane and Valley View Road 7/3/2018 11:14 AM 7 sally lane and valley view road 6/28/2018 4:06 PM 8 McCauley Trail and Valley View Road due to driver behavior.6/27/2018 9:07 PM 9 Sally Lane and Valley View 6/27/2018 1:53 PM 10 Indian Hills Rd/Dakota Trail 6/26/2018 5:15 PM 11 Valley View and McCauley Trail 6/20/2018 8:59 PM 12 Valley View/Sally Lane (visibility) Paiute/Sally Lane (not stopping), West Trail/Sally (lack of traffic controls), Iroquois Trail/Indian Hills/Mohawk Trail (lack of visibility) 6/17/2018 5:25 PM 13 Sally Lane and Valley View Rd 6/15/2018 10:46 AM 14 sally lane & valley view and sally lane & west trail 6/13/2018 11:20 AM 15 Paiute Drive and Sally Lane also Valley View and Sally Lane 6/12/2018 5:08 PM 16 Dakota Trail & Dakota Trail 6/12/2018 4:36 PM 17 Sally Lane and Valley View 6/12/2018 11:59 AM 18 Valley View Rd / McCauly Trail intersection 6/11/2018 6:52 PM 19 Sally and Valley View, cannot see traffic to the west of intersect.6/11/2018 6:10 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 10 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 15.79%3 78.95%15 31.58%6 15.79%3 15.79%3 0.00%0 0.00%0 5.26%1 21.05%4 Q10 Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) Answered: 19 Skipped: 18 Total Respondents: 19 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 Lilac bushes to the west obstruct view 7/5/2018 1:37 PM Lack of traffic cont... Issues with sight lines ... Drivers failing to s... Drivers failing to... Drivers turning corn... Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 11 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 2 The bushes at the house on Sally Lane and Valley View Rd are overgrown and block sight lines 7/3/2018 11:17 AM 3 sight lines on Valley View and Sally (Trees) & Street Light may be needed at Paiute Drive and Sally Lane 6/12/2018 5:08 PM 4 Speed and Volume of traffic on Valley View Road 6/11/2018 6:10 PM 12 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 80.00%16 5.00%1 15.00%3 Q11 In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: Answered: 20 Skipped: 17 TOTAL 20 Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging,... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, running 13 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 48.57%17 28.57%10 14.29%5 8.57%3 0.00%0 Q12 How frequently do you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood? Answered: 35 Skipped: 2 TOTAL 35 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 14 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 93.94%31 63.64%21 15.15%5 3.03%1 9.09%3 0.00%0 0.00%0 6.06%2 Q13 If you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Answered: 33 Skipped: 4 Total Respondents: 33 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 enjoy being outside and the walkway is safe 6/27/2018 1:53 PM 2 Walk to the golf course 6/11/2018 5:30 PM Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) t... Travel to/from destination... Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 15 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q14 If you don't walk, jog or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Answered: 3 Skipped: 34 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Cold/wet weather Lack of time 7/28/2018 8:24 PM 2 No sidewalks, unsafe 6/17/2018 5:27 PM 3 Quality of roadway is bad. Too much of a crown on roadway causes sore ankles when running. Many times I will end up running in the middle of the road to avoid crown and poor roadway. I will drive to Bredeson park to do my exercise, which is ok as long as the paths are in good shape and free of water from the creek. Don't like the new combined bike/walk way though...too dangerous. 6/11/2018 6:13 PM 16 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 2.94%1 14.71%5 26.47%9 23.53%8 32.35%11 Q15 How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Answered: 34 Skipped: 3 TOTAL 34 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 17 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 76.19%16 14.29%3 14.29%3 4.76%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 4.76%1 Q16 If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Answered: 21 Skipped: 16 Total Respondents: 21 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 Help young children with biking etc.7/1/2018 6:57 PM Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) t... Travel to/from destination... Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 18 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q17 If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Answered: 4 Skipped: 33 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Not interested in riding a bike.8/14/2018 2:55 PM 2 Cold/wet weather Lack of time 7/28/2018 8:25 PM 3 Lack of safe feeling crossing of Hwy 169 at Valley View Rd. Terrible road conditions on Braemar Blvd between Valley View and Gleason Rd. 7/5/2018 1:40 PM 4 Don't own one' use the stationary bikes at the club 6/11/2018 5:31 PM 19 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 6.06%2 9.09%3 6.06%2 30.30%10 48.48%16 Q18 How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? Answered: 33 Skipped: 4 TOTAL 33 Very frequently... Frequently (2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 20 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 3.03%1 18.18%6 42.42%14 30.30%10 6.06%2 Q19 How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? Answered: 33 Skipped: 4 TOTAL 33 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 21 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 54.55%18 33.33%11 12.12%4 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q20 How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? Answered: 33 Skipped: 4 TOTAL 33 #ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ABOUT PARKING?DATE 1 We are on a large cul-de-sac which allows for additional parking in the center to supplement parking along the curb. 7/28/2018 8:32 PM 2 Comment for neighbors visitors parking, not service trucks.6/27/2018 1:56 PM Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 22 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q21 Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Answered: 4 Skipped: 33 #RESPONSES DATE 1 The intersection at Sally Lane and Valley View Rd is obstructed by a large lilac hedge.7/28/2018 8:32 PM 2 The pavement needs repair and could be in a better shape.7/1/2018 6:58 PM 3 minimum of a Yield sign at uncontrolled intersection is needed.6/12/2018 4:38 PM 4 Our street, Bello drive, has some serious bumps and dips.6/12/2018 1:03 PM 23 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 34.38%11 65.63%21 Q22 Do you favor improving the streetlights in your neighborhood (residential streetlights are funded by special assessment)? Answered: 32 Skipped: 5 TOTAL 32 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 The LED lights are too bright! In the wintertime when there aren’t any leaves we have to add special blinds so we don’t wake up because of the bright LED light that. Can’t here be a shroud or shade hat can direct the light downward? Or can we change the one light (Shawnee Circle) to a different style light that offers a warmer color than that white light? 8/14/2018 10:08 PM 2 I do not like streetlights. Night should be dark except where it is a safety issue.7/5/2018 1:42 PM 3 That was just done and we love the lights 6/27/2018 1:56 PM 4 At intersections.6/12/2018 5:11 PM 5 We don't need new street lights. We are a very quiet residential street and would not like the light pollution. 6/11/2018 6:16 PM 6 I would prefer the white-blue lights vs sodium 6/11/2018 5:32 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 24 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q23 Street Number Answered: 30 Skipped: 7 #RESPONSES DATE 1 6912 8/14/2018 10:08 PM 2 6500 8/14/2018 2:55 PM 3 7013 7/28/2018 8:33 PM 4 6901 7/5/2018 1:43 PM 5 6916 7/4/2018 8:51 AM 6 6625 7/3/2018 11:59 AM 7 6613 7/3/2018 11:18 AM 8 6613 7/3/2018 11:15 AM 9 Sally Ln, Edina MN 7/1/2018 6:59 PM 10 6901 6/27/2018 9:08 PM 11 7021 6/27/2018 1:57 PM 12 6813 6/26/2018 7:30 PM 13 6505 6/26/2018 5:17 PM 14 25 6/25/2018 7:36 AM 15 6801 6/20/2018 8:48 AM 16 6504 6/19/2018 6:35 PM 17 6837 6/17/2018 5:30 PM 18 6609 6/15/2018 10:48 AM 19 6604 6/13/2018 11:21 AM 20 6841 6/13/2018 6:37 AM 21 6829 6/12/2018 7:42 PM 22 6800 6/12/2018 5:11 PM 23 7 6/12/2018 4:38 PM 24 33 6/12/2018 1:03 PM 25 6909 6/12/2018 12:29 PM 26 6804 6/12/2018 12:00 PM 27 6800 6/12/2018 9:45 AM 28 6833 6/11/2018 9:28 PM 29 6808 6/11/2018 6:53 PM 30 6608 6/11/2018 6:16 PM 25 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q24 Street name Answered: 33 Skipped: 4 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Dakota Trail 8/14/2018 10:08 PM 2 Shawnee Circle 8/14/2018 2:55 PM 3 Comanche Ct 7/28/2018 8:33 PM 4 Paiute Drive 7/5/2018 1:43 PM 5 Dakota Trail 7/4/2018 8:51 AM 6 Paiute Pass 7/3/2018 11:59 AM 7 Paiute Pass 7/3/2018 11:18 AM 8 Paiute Pass 7/3/2018 11:15 AM 9 Sally Ln, Edina MN 7/1/2018 6:59 PM 10 Paiute Drive 6/28/2018 4:07 PM 11 Paiute Drive 6/27/2018 9:08 PM 12 Comanche Ct 6/27/2018 1:57 PM 13 sally lane 6/26/2018 7:30 PM 14 Shawnee Circle 6/26/2018 5:17 PM 15 bello 6/25/2018 7:36 AM 16 Sally Ln 6/20/2018 9:00 PM 17 Paiute Dr 6/20/2018 8:48 AM 18 Shawnee 6/19/2018 6:35 PM 19 Sally Lane 6/17/2018 5:30 PM 20 Paiute Pass 6/15/2018 10:48 AM 21 paiute pass 6/13/2018 11:21 AM 22 Sally Lane 6/13/2018 6:37 AM 23 sally lane 6/12/2018 7:42 PM 24 Paiute Drive 6/12/2018 5:11 PM 25 Overholt Pass 6/12/2018 4:38 PM 26 bello drive 6/12/2018 1:03 PM 27 Paiute Drive 6/12/2018 12:29 PM 28 Sally Lane 6/12/2018 12:00 PM 29 Sally Lane 6/12/2018 9:45 AM 30 Sally Ln 6/11/2018 9:28 PM 31 Paiute Dr 6/11/2018 6:53 PM 32 Paiute Pass 6/11/2018 6:16 PM 33 Comanche Court 6/11/2018 5:32 PM 26 / 26 Indian Trails B & C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire APPENDIX J Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials 8/14/2018 1 The CITYof EDINA 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting August 13, 2018 The CITYof EDINAAgenda •Introductions •Why Reconstruct •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Project Scopes •Timeline •Communication •How to Prepare •Q&A www.EdinaMN.gov 2-C The CITYof EDINA2019 Projects •Chowen Park A & B – 308 properties •Indian Trails B & C – 93 properties •Indian Hills C – 16 properties •Todd Park E – 7 properties www.EdinaMN.gov 3-C The CITYof EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4-A Introductions Director of Assistant Engineering Transportation Engineering City Engineer Services Manager Planner Engineering Technicians Chad Ross Mark Tom Andrew DerekMillner Bintner Nolan Haataja Scipioni Northenscold Engineering GIS Water Resources Graduate Traffic SafetyCoordinator Administrator Coordinator Engineer Coordinator Liz Rebecca Jessica Charlie Nick Moore Foster Wilson Gerk Bauler Jon Drew Moore Torgerson The CITYof EDINA •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •- Extends pavement life •- Maximizes economics of scale •Prioritized based on; •- Pavement condition •-Age of original construction •- Underground utility issues www.EdinaMN.gov 5-A Why My Street? The CITYof EDINAWhy Reconstruct? •Originally constructed in 1910s-1990s (20-100 years old) •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, seal coat) www.EdinaMN.gov 6-A 8/14/2018 2 The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Roadways •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Most streets have curb and gutter •Many properties already have concrete driveway aprons www.EdinaMN.gov 7-A The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions -Alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 8-A •Concrete and gravel •Some areas have storm sewer •Concerns about required maintenance (snow plowing operations) The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains www.EdinaMN.gov 9-C •Sanitary Sewer - Inflow and infiltration - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing The CITYof EDINA •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences •Landscaping •Outwalks/steps Existing Conditions – Right-of-Way www.EdinaMN.gov 10-C The CITYof EDINAWhat/Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey www.EdinaMN.gov 11-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Roadways •Replacement of curb & gutter (partial or entire) •New roadbed and pavement surface www.EdinaMN.gov 12-A 8/14/2018 3 The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Plan •Approved by City Council in 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders •Incorporates; •- Minimum roadway design elements •- Sidewalk Facilities Plan •- Bicycle Facilities Plan •-Active Routes to School Plan www.EdinaMN.gov 13-C The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Classifications www.EdinaMN.gov 14-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced/installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy www.EdinaMN.gov 15-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Utilities •Localized watermain and service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •Localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Storm sewer upgrades www.EdinaMN.gov 16-A The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website www.EdinaMN.gov 17-A The CITYof EDINA •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Utility Ownership www.EdinaMN.gov 18-C Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service 8/14/2018 4 The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Sidewalks •Based on Sidewalk Facilities Map •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and construction conflicts www.EdinaMN.gov 20-A The CITYof EDINAPrivate Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance •Streetlight upgrades typically not included with project www.EdinaMN.gov 21-A The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Localized flooding during rainfall •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 22-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in yards •Construction equipment stored on streets •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) www.EdinaMN.gov 23-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 5 days to allow driveways to cure •Irrigation and pet fence systems most likely will be damaged www.EdinaMN.gov 24-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •-You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •- Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be seeded www.EdinaMN.gov 25-A 8/14/2018 5 The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •We will; •- Provide opportunities for input •- Keep you informed •- Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs www.EdinaMN.gov 26-A The CITYof EDINACity Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •- Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •- Sanitary sewer •-Watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 27-C The CITYof EDINAPedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •- Sidewalks •- Bike lanes •-Associated signage and pavement markings www.EdinaMN.gov 28-C The CITYof EDINADo Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •- Snowplowing •- Pothole repairs •- Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction www.EdinaMN.gov 29-C Source: Hennepin County website 8/2/2016 The CITYof EDINASpecial Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers 100% of roadway costs (20% on MSA roadways) •- Roadway and driveway removals •- Subgrade materials •-Asphalt pavement •- Restoration www.EdinaMN.gov 30-C The CITYof EDINAResidential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •- Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties www.EdinaMN.gov 31-C ScenarioScenarioScenarioScenario Land UseLand UseLand UseLand Use ClassClassClassClass REU FactorREU FactorREU FactorREU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 B Multi-Family Residential 0.8 8/14/2018 6 The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Chowen Park A&B •308 properties (268 REUs) •2.02 miles of road •Full replacement/installation of curb & gutter •Full replacement of watermain, water services •5’ sidewalk on Beard Avenue www.EdinaMN.gov 32-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Chowen Park A&B •0.42 miles of gravel alleys •New asphalt pavement on existing gravel alleys •0.53 miles of concrete alleys •Repairs may be performed on existing concrete alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 33-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Indian Trails B&C •93 properties (88.01 REUs) •1.1 miles of road •Spot replacement of curb & gutter •- New curb & gutter on Shawnee Circle/ Overholt Pass •Spot replacement of watermain, water services •Possible repair/replacement of retaining walls on Shawnee Circle/Overholt Pass www.EdinaMN.gov 34-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Indian Hills C •16 properties (13.5 REUs) •0.15 miles of road •Spot replacement of curb & gutter www.EdinaMN.gov 35-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details –Todd Park E •7 properties (5.5 REUs) •0.11 miles of road •Installation of new curb & gutter •Spot replacement of watermain, water services •Improvements to storm sewer system www.EdinaMN.gov 36-A The CITYof EDINAPreliminary Assessments *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) www.EdinaMN.gov 37-C Neighborhood Estimated Assessment Range per REU* # of REUs SquareYards of Paving Square Yards of Paving per REU Chowen Park A&B (roadway) $8,000 - $12,100 268.00 27,615 103.04 Chowen Park A&B (alley) $1,100 - $1,900 62.00 2,953 47.63 Indian Trails B&C $14,300 – $19,100 88.01 16,341 185.67 Indian Hills C $9,900 - $13,700 13.50 2,195 162.61 Todd Park E TBD 5.50 992 180.30 8/14/2018 7 The CITYof EDINATypical Project Timeline www.EdinaMN.gov 41-C July – September 2018 Engineering studies/estimates provided December 2018 Public hearings January – March 2019 Plan preparation and bidding April – May 2019 Construction begins October – November 2019 Construction concludes Spring 2020 Warranty work Fall 2020 Final assessment hearing The CITYof EDINAAssessment Timing www.EdinaMN.gov 42-C Initial Public Hearings December 2018 Project Constructed Summer 2019 Final Assessment Hearing October 2020 Assessment Filed with County November 2020 Assessment on Tax Statement January 2021 The CITYof EDINAPayment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance charges •Pay 25%; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years (10 years for alleys) •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years (10 years for alleys) •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older •- Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •- 2016 interest rate was 3.25% •-Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 www.EdinaMN.gov 43-C The CITYof EDINACommunication www.EdinaMN.gov 44-A •Regular Mail -All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires - Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers -Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, paving, temporary inaccessibility) •City Website Project Page The CITYof EDINAProviding Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •-Traffic/pedestrian issues •- Street drainage issues •- Streetlight upgrades •- Sump pump connection options •Public hearing in December 2018 •- Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns www.EdinaMN.gov 45-A The CITYof EDINAQuestionnaire Results www.EdinaMN.gov 46-A Neighborhood Responses Received to Date Chowen ParkA&B 29% (90 / 308) IndianTrails B&C 38% (35 / 93) Indian Hills C 13% (2 / 16) Todd Park E 71% (5 / 7) 8/14/2018 8 The CITYof EDINACity Extra •Free, weekly email updates on project progress and schedules •Best way to stay informed •www.EdinaMN.gov/CityExtra •- Check box next to your project name •If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates upon request www.EdinaMN.gov 47-A The CITYof EDINAHow To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Sign up for City Extra •Ask questions, stay informed www.EdinaMN.gov 48-C The CITYof EDINA Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Contact Us www.EdinaMN.gov 49-A Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449 LMoore@edinamn.gov Andrew Scipioni Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 AScipioni@edinamn.gov The CITYof EDINAQuestions? www.EdinaMN.gov 50-A Thanks for your time! 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 1G ' 2 ge: .,-7-- olv,,,r-A , 3 o ty, , 4 .74' 6 7 „_1:(-( (7/ r CL / ( 8 T75)(D 17/77( 7: 9 "•-ifiZt.:t.5 "75-",)i -i 10 11 4.vr rE ?. 12 i 13 7,< 14 o!o- fr c 15 1:3v 0 16 UO 18 c- _ 19 - 20 ikA g yy 21 22 23 ,, ' 24 , 25 r- c LD- Z.-NAL. 26 27 r& 6 fix re v\ SEWS /11\9011 Ave. c • 28 /). /3-T7 clui G> 76)5) c 29 30 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME i ADDRESS 1 (2/), /4411-, _ ),4C )10,5 2 Com'` I Si --- - 3 MARK- 10,41)04 S-8 t 3 -D124.3n) Ave S'i,„ 4 AL) ei-) 5 i 6 L t_ /2 d__ 7 ":5(/ .I_) zilf Fie ,5-61/}1 /X Sc. 8 L.) ---,-- cl. (--( ._ 0-t u‘e , ,,,„_, 9 -FL,-SA Z E 4ckf i 10 t r - )T0. 11 i i & - LC, 12 56Wo ..(Aril"? Al J`e ) 4' 13 r ? e-). 1//// z-.. ts 14 15 09,") c- 4,0,v ccic„, 16 (9 , So/ \ I 17 , :,-'..)o EA 0 cv 5 - g 2 tt •cics,15 la- Jr& • S 18 -t 2 z.. 19 & 7(-1?(E)---Lta_f _i___ - Cil-t_ 0-t- 20 p, livi, 'U._ ( &(i Pa 21 2 / L- err 2 * ( ef t 1,/ (267 22 23 / 24 -----, .,6 ; i Ve. e 4,- y 4; .' r 25 . ii 0 7 7 ilt,--(-;, 26 -Te (-vz--1-- -C812/ 1 ilac.AJ cati Ar S 27 28 29 30 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 / 4 ( A ,a--(/ s C 2 1 G t / 4 - (-) S 3 `Th`t 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 APPENDIX K Correspondence from Residents 1 Liz Moore From:Andrew Scipioni Sent:Wednesday, August 15, 2018 2:30 PM To: Subject:RE: 2019 Road Project John, There are a few reasons why Indian Trails B/C has a higher estimated assessment range. One of the main reasons is that the properties in Indian Trails are less dense than the other proposed project areas; Project Area Residential Equivalent Units (REUs) Project Length, mi REUs/Mile Chowen Park A/B 268 2.02 132.67 Indian Hills C 13.5 0.15 90 Indian Trails B/C 88.01 1.10 80.01 Another reason for the difference in estimated assessments is the difference in existing soil conditions between project areas. While designing these projects, we hire a consultant to perform soil borings in order to better determine what types of soils we will encounter during the project. While some roadways were built on suitable materials, others were not and may require subgrade corrections in order to maximize the lifespan of the new roadway. Because these subgrade corrections are related to the roadway improvements, they are included in the estimated assessment. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 11:04 AM To: Andrew Scipioni Subject: 2019 Road Project Hello Andrew, I live at 6913 Paiute Drive and attended the meeting last night. One question that came to mind after I left, was why is Indian Trials B & C paying so much per REU? It is considerably higher than the other projects. Understanding the bids/costs are not firm yet. Thank you. John Miller 1 Liz Moore From:Swanson, Michelle M Sent:Wednesday, April 18, 2018 8:50 AM To:Chad Millner Cc:Brian Olson; Carter Schulze Subject:RE: 6500 Shawnee Circle Edina Thanks for the follow‐up! Michelle Swanson * Please note new phone number ________________________________________________ Please consider the environment before printing this email. ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Chad Millner [mailto:cmillner@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 8:36 AM To: Swanson, Michelle M Cc: Brian Olson; Carter Schulze Subject: RE: 6500 Shawnee Circle Edina This email originated from an external sender. Exercise caution before clicking on any links or attachments and consider whether you know the sender. For more information please visit the Phishing page on . Michelle, The walls along the ROW are City walls. As it turns on private property is a discussion point going forward. Here's our plan. 1. Traffic barrels will go up today so cars don't park next to the exposed blocks that may fall. 2. After the snow melts and the frost is out of the ground we will review if we can temp fix this in anticipation for street reconstruction next year. 3. Meet with residents this summer to discuss the street reconstruction project and options for these walls. 4. If full wall replacement is needed, discuss limits of construction where the walls enter private property. Thanks for sending us this information, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 952‐826‐0318 | Fax 952‐826‐0392 2 cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Swanson, Michelle M [mailto:] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 8:55 AM To: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 6500 Shawnee Circle Edina Chad, here are some photos...thanks. Michelle Michelle Swanson * Please note new phone number ________________________________________________ Please consider the environment before printing this email. ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐ From: Swanson, Michelle M Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 8:54 AM To: Swanson, Michelle M Subject: : This email originated from an external sender. Exercise caution before clicking on any links or attachments and consider whether you know the sender. For more information please visit the Phishing page on . 1 Liz Moore From:Carter Schulze Sent:Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:23 PM To:Chad Millner; 'John and Susie Van Hoomissen' Cc:Andrew Scipioni Subject:RE: Power Point Attachments:20170925 Open House Mtg_2019&20 Projects.pdf Please see the attached powerpoint from last night. Regarding your construction question, we prioritize our street projects based on pavement condition and also utility condition. I understand your point of including the other streets with Dakota Trail, but since Dakota Trail was recently repaved, it moves it down on the priority list much farther than we would want to wait for the others. Then we would be forced to include those small streets as separate projects which would increase the costs much more. Regards, Carter Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: Chad Millner Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 9:16 AM To: 'John and Susie Van Hoomissen' > Cc: Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov>; Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Power Point Thanks for the compliments but I can’t take credit for it. Carter Schulze and Andrew Scipioni presented and answered questions. I copied them on this so they can get back to you on your questions. I appreciate your engagement in the process and willingness to share information with your neighbors. Let us know if there is a different way to get the information out. Thanks, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392 cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: John and Susie Van Hoomissen [mailto Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 9:48 PM To: Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Power Point 2 Mr. Millner, Thank you for the informative open house tonight. I appreciate that you took the time explained the process to us. Could I please trouble you to forward to me the power point presentation? I was taking notes for a few of my neighbors and I think it will be beneficial for them to see the power point. In addition, I have a question about the proposed road improvements that are included in our neighborhood. I live in the Indian Trails B section. There are three roads quite detached from our neighborhood that are included in the project - Overholt Pass, Shawnee Circle, and Bello Drive. It would seem to me that by including these roads, the contractor's costs will be increase since all staging materials will either be spread out or there will need to be more transport during the reconstruction. From a cost effectiveness perspective, would it make more economic sense to include those roads when Dakota Trail is done in the future? Thank you for your time and assistance, Susie Van Hoomissen APPENDIX L Gale-Tec Retaining Wall Report GALE-TEC ENGINEERING, INC. 801 TWELVE OAKS CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 832 WAYZATA, MN 55391 TELEPHONE (952) 473-7193 FAX (952) 473-1492 www.gale-tec.com July 9, 2018 Mr. Chad Millner/Mr. Andrew Scipioni Revised August 22, 2018 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 GTE Project No. 95520 Re: Retaining Wall Options for Replacement of Natural Stone Wall along Shawnee Circle/Overholt Pass in Edina, MN Dear Mr. Millner: In accordance with you authorization, we are pleased to provide you with our final report of potential wall reconstruction options regarding the above referenced project. This report has been revised based on the discussion at our August 20, 2018 meeting. If you have any questions concerning the report, please do not hesitate to contact us. Respectfully, GALE-TEC ENGINEERING, INC. Stephan M. Gale, P.E. Nathan M. Lichty, P.E. Principal Engineer Project Engineer Enclosure: Wall Photographs SMG/NML/pjk REPORT/Edina, City of, Shawnee Circle Wall Option Report, Edina, MN City of Edina Shawnee Circle Retaining Wall, Edina, MN Gale-Tec Engineering, Inc. AUGUST, 2018 2 INTRODUCTION A natural stone retaining wall exists on the north side of Shawnee Circle extending approximately 500 feet upslope from Dakota Trail and is interrupted by two driveways. The wall supports residential properties and has a maximum height of approximately 7 feet and contains an approximate 3H-4H:1V backslope along the majority of its alignment. Additionally, a similar natural stone wall exists around the curve along the east side of Overholt Pass. This wall has a maximum height of about 8ft and contains a level to slight backslope with several large trees located at the wall crest. Several portions of both walls have suffered distressed in the form of bulging and a portion of the Shawnee Circle wall was rebuilt by the City in the Spring, 2018. Soil erosion between and behind the natural stone blocks can also be observed at locations along the wall alignment. The City has requested that we evaluate wall reconstruction options that could likely occur during Shawnee Circle/Overholt Pass street reconstruction, which is planned in 2019. The City has indicated that they would like to pursue wall reconstruction options that avoid mass excavation behind and below the existing walls to minimize the impact on the adjacent residential properties. Both existing streets are approximately 30ft in width and the City has indicated that the street width could be reduced to facilitate wall reconstruction to avoid a mass excavation. This report was prepared in accordance with our agreement dated June 22, 2018 and approved on June 25. SITE RECONNAISSANCE GTE engineers Mr. S. Gale, P.E. and Mr. N. Lichty, P.E., along with City personnel, observed the retaining walls in June and August 2018. The attached photographs show that the natural stone stacked retaining walls appear to be limestone quarried stone units that are 3 inches to 6 inches in height and 8 inches to 20 inches long. The depths of the blocks into the hillside could not be determined, but the block thicknesses are likely 8 – 12 inches. The Shawnee Circle wall is approximately 500 feet long with a maximum height in the range of 7 feet and with an approximate 3H:1V slope extending up from the top of the wall at many locations. The Overholt Pass retaining wall is approximately 150ft in length with a maximum height of about 8ft. Several trees exist directly behind the block facing along both wall alignments. It does not appear that a gravel aggregate drainage/filtration layer was placed behind the stone units, as is required by the current Standard Plate 520. We observed a silty sand soil behind the block. This soil type was also encountered by several hand augers that were recently performed behind the retaining walls by another soil testing company. The natural stone wall on the north side of Shawnee Circle turns into two driveways and extends into those private properties. We understand that the City has recently met with these residents, who indicated that they would like a similar wall type to tie into the walls located on their property. City of Edina Shawnee Circle Retaining Wall, Edina, MN Gale-Tec Engineering, Inc. AUGUST, 2018 3 We are not aware of any drawings available for the existing retaining wall. The City of Edina has a Plate for Natural Stone Retaining Walls – Standard Plate 520. This Standard Plate identifies that a dry-laid random course quarry faced stone should be stacked no more than 4 feet high above base grade. Since many portions of this wall exceed this 4 foot height requirement, the Standard Plate should not be used and an engineering design would be required for the new wall. The cause for the wall distress this Spring appears to be the erosion of the silty sand backfill through the joints of the blocks with the water seepage and erosion resulting in distress to the upper portion of the wall. At other locations along the wall, the wall has bulged outward to a past vertical, or negative batter. POTENTIAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONS Because a portion of this wall has suffered distress in the form of soil erosion between the natural stone wall facing, and it is likely that this erosion will continue along other portions of the wall, the City is considering reconstructing these walls when Shawnee Circle/Overholt Pass pavement reconstruction occurs in 2019. The City has indicated that it would be preferable to reduce the existing street width by several feet to facilitate minimal disturbance to the adjacent residential properties. We have limited our discussion to certain types of gravity walls that would require a small amount of excavation behind the wall face. Wall types that would require a more extensive excavation, such as a geogrid reinforced wall or a cast-in-place cantilever concrete wall were not considered. Four (4) potential reconstruction options are discussed: 1) building a new Precast Modular Block Wall (PMBW) in front of the existing natural stone wall or 2) demolishing the existing stone wall and constructing a new natural stone wall along the same approximate alignment, 3) demolishing the existing stone wall and constructing a new Precast Modular Block Wall (PMBW) along the same approximate alignment and 4) constructing a new natural stone wall in-front of the existing stone walls. Option 1 – Leave Existing Natural Stone Wall in Place and Build a New Wall In Front of the Existing Wall. The existing pavement is approximately 30 feet from edge to edge. One potential option for a gravity structure that could be placed in front of the existing natural stone wall would be a precast modular block wall (PMBW) (Big Block wall). Most of the “Big Block” manufacturers have facing textures that resemble a stacked natural stone face. Preliminary analyses indicate that a 7 foot high wall would need to have a base unit with a depth of 48 inches. Considering that a 1 foot drainage layer would need to be placed between the back of the new PMBW block and the existing natural stone wall, the new wall face would need to extend out from the existing base of the existing stone wall into the street by about 5 feet. City of Edina Shawnee Circle Retaining Wall, Edina, MN Gale-Tec Engineering, Inc. AUGUST, 2018 4 For PMBW construction in front of the existing wall, the existing wall would need to be covered with a separation/filtration geotextile such as a MnDOT Type 3733 Type 4 geotextile, then the PMBW wall placed and finally a ¾ inch clear crushed rock backfill placed between the back of the PMBW and the geotextile. A drainage pipe that empties into the storm sewer system should also be placed. The PMBW would need to be supported on at least a 6 inch thick leveling pad consisting of Class 5 – 100% crushed material supported over an acceptable subgrade. Several PMBW concrete block types have been approved by MnDOT for applications adjacent to roadways where salt spray can occur. Plans and Specifications would need to be created such that a salt resistant concrete block product is specified. A similar concept was previously used by the City of Edina in order to reconstruct a new PMBW wall in front of a timber wall that had failed at Garden Park. Option 2 – Remove Existing Natural Stone Wall and Reconstruct a New Natural Stone Wall with a No-Fines Concrete Backfill and either reuse a portion of the Existing Natural Stone Blocks or use New Natural Stone Blocks as the wall face. The commonly used dry cast modular block walls would require geogrid reinforcement if constructed to a height of 7 feet. The geogrid would need to extend back from the wall a distance of approximately 6 feet. As such, removal of the existing natural stone blocks and the excavation into the hill of at least 6 ft. would be required to install the geogrid. We do not think that this large of a cut into the hill would be acceptable to the City. In recent years, a concept to allow higher segmental walls composed of smaller dry cast modular block or smaller natural stone blocks has been developed so that geogrid is not needed. This concept involves the placement of a no-fines, porous concrete mixture as a replacement for both the aggregate drainage layer and the reinforced backfill behind the wall face. This special concrete mix contains coarse aggregate, no fine aggregate and specific water to cement and aggregate to cement ratios to develop a reasonable compressive strength, while being free draining to alleviate any water pressures at the back of the wall. The no-fines concrete section behind the block face allows the wall to act as a gravity wall system. The no-fines section thickness is a function of soil conditions, the wall height and wall back slope angle. For a wall height of 7ft, a 2½ft thick layer of no-fines concrete placed behind an approximate 8-12 inch deep natural stone block would be required to maintain a minimum factor of safety of 1.5 with respect to direct sliding, overturning and bearing capacity. It would be better if the existing hillside was not disturbed after the natural stone block was removed, though removal of tree root balls adjacent to the top of the wall would be required. Option 2, which would include 8-12 inch deep new natural stone blocks and an approximate 2½ft foot thick zone of no-fines concrete where the wall is 7 to 8ft high. This would move the wall out about 2½ft in toward the street from front face of the existing natural stone wall. We recommend that the Specification for construction of the new wall require that construction occur in stages so as to reduce the Contractor’s risk of landslides occurring during excavation and wall reconstruction. City of Edina Shawnee Circle Retaining Wall, Edina, MN Gale-Tec Engineering, Inc. AUGUST, 2018 5 The reuse of the existing natural stone blocks would need to be further evaluated. Issues such as stone quality, stone depth, existing mortar on the upper blocks and wall staging would need to be considered. Option 3 – Removal of Existing Natural Stone Wall and Replacement with a PMBW “Big Block” Wall System. After the removal of the existing natural stone blocks, a MnDOT 3733 Type 4 Geotextile should be placed over the hillside slope soils and then the PMBW “Big Block” wall system constructed. Since the base block needs to be 48 inches deep as discussed for Option 1 and considering a 1 foot thick drainage layer behind the block, the front face of the new PMBW “Big Block” retaining wall would move the wall approximately 5 feet in toward the street from the front face of the existing wall. As with Option 1, the drainage rock should consist of a ¾ inch clear crushed aggregate material with a perforated drainage pipe placed at the wall base. Option 4 - Reconstruct a New Natural Stone Wall with a No-Fines Concrete Backfill in front of Existing Natural Stone Walls. This option is similar to Option No. 2 in that it uses a no-fines concrete behind the natural stone block facing to construct a gravity retaining wall. The difference between Option 2 and this option (Option 4) would be that the old walls would remain in place with the new natural stone wall and with no-fines concrete placed between the new and the existing walls. With this option, the existing natural stone facing could contribute to the overall gravity wall section thickness, therefore reducing the no-fines concrete section thickness required to maintain a minimum factor of safety with respect to overturning and sliding. Considering the silty sand soil conditions, as well new and existing natural stone blocks in-place, it was determined that for an 8ft wall height that a minimum 2ft thick no fines concrete section would be required to be placed between the old and new stone to maintain a minimum factor of safety of 1.5 with respect to wall stability. For wall heights less than 5½ft the no-fines concrete section thickness could be reduced to 1½ft. A drain should be placed at the bottom of the no-fines section to alleviate water build-up behind the new stone wall face. This natural stone wall reconstruction concept would require the Shawnee Circle and Overholt Pass street widths to be reduced by approximately 3ft and could likely result in only minor disturbance to the adjacent properties along the wall alignment. SUMMARY Once a wall reconstruction option has been determined then we can work with the City during final design to develop wall reconstruction plans and specifications. Shawnee Circle Retaining Wall June/August, 2018 GTE Project No. 95520 Existing Natural Stone Wall - Looking toward Dakota Trail Street is paved right up to base of wall. Existing Natural Stone Wall - Tree at top of Wall Blocks are 3-6 inches in height and 8-20 inches long. APPENDIX M Preliminary Assessment Roll INDIAN TRAILS B/C NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-452 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PID Owner House No. Street Assessable REU Assessable Amount 1 07-116-21-21-0060 D WALIA / S NATH-WALIA 14 BELLO DR 1 15,600.00$ 2 07-116-21-21-0051 ARNE M ROVICK/EDITH V ROVICK 17 BELLO DR 0.5 7,800.00$ 3 07-116-21-21-0052 N O PEYTON PERS RESI TRUST 25 BELLO DR 1 15,600.00$ 4 07-116-21-21-0053 J H MCGUIRE & S W MCGUIRE 33 BELLO DR 0.5 7,800.00$ 5 07-116-21-21-0054 S CHOPRA & E CHOPRA 42 BELLO DR 0.5 7,800.00$ 6 07-116-21-21-0009 E & C MARTIN III 7005 COMANCHE CT 1 15,600.00$ 7 07-116-21-21-0010 NAOMI W GRIFFITH TRUSTEE 7009 COMANCHE CT 1 15,600.00$ 8 07-116-21-21-0011 D W & D P LATHAM 7013 COMANCHE CT 1 15,600.00$ 9 07-116-21-21-0017 C J BOLIN & T BOLIN 7017 COMANCHE CT 1 15,600.00$ 10 07-116-21-21-0041 LAWRENCE J CIPOLLA & WIFE 7021 COMANCHE CT 1 15,600.00$ 11 07-116-21-21-0042 R P DOUGLAS & D C DOUGLAS 7025 COMANCHE CT 1 15,600.00$ 12 07-116-21-21-0043 SUSAN R RUSSO REV TRUST 7029 COMANCHE CT 1 15,600.00$ 13 07-116-21-21-0044 ZHIRONG ZHAO & LINA GENG 7033 COMANCHE CT 0.67 10,452.00$ 14 06-116-21-34-0050 C J & T M BONVINO 6908 DAKOTA TR 0.5 7,800.00$ 15 06-116-21-34-0040 TONY VANDEN HEUVEL ET AL 6912 DAKOTA TR 0.5 7,800.00$ 16 06-116-21-34-0051 JTK SNOWBALL LLC 1 OVERHOLT PASS 1 15,600.00$ 17 06-116-21-34-0047 SARAH BROWN RUSS TRUSTEE 7 OVERHOLT PASS 1 15,600.00$ 18 06-116-21-34-0045 D A HORNIG & B M HORNIG 8 OVERHOLT PASS 1 15,600.00$ 19 06-116-21-34-0046 ELMER R SALOVICH TRUSTEE 12 OVERHOLT PASS 1 15,600.00$ 20 07-116-21-21-0059 KURT P & JANE E SCHELLHAS*16 OVERHOLT PASS 1 15,600.00$ 21 06-116-21-34-0021 M G PEACOCK & N A PEACOCK 6904 PAIUTE CIR 1 15,600.00$ 22 06-116-21-34-0022 R BENNETT & A BENNETT 6906 PAIUTE CIR 1 15,600.00$ 23 06-116-21-34-0023 D'AQUILA GRANDCHILDREN TRSTS 6908 PAIUTE CIR 1 15,600.00$ 24 06-116-21-34-0024 J W LENNANDER/L J LENNANDER 6910 PAIUTE CIR 1 15,600.00$ 25 06-116-21-34-0015 CHRISTOFER REECK 6800 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 26 06-116-21-34-0014 P JOHNSON & MARIAN JOHNSON 6801 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 27 06-116-21-34-0016 PARTICIA J KLOVER 6804 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 28 06-116-21-34-0013 RICHARD E COX & RENE M COX 6805 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 29 06-116-21-34-0017 P J MILAN/C F KAISER-MILAN 6808 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 30 06-116-21-34-0012 RONALD E DECESARE ETAL 6809 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 31 06-116-21-34-0018 SAMUEL NELSON AWSUMB ET AL 6812 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 32 06-116-21-34-0011 P H & J L DUQUETTE TRUSTEES 6813 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 33 06-116-21-34-0010 J M SCHUMACHER/E M FRANKLIN 6817 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 34 06-116-21-34-0009 MARY ANNELLA BENJAMIN 6821 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 35 06-116-21-34-0019 T E PROPSON & C L MEHAN 6900 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 36 06-116-21-34-0031 R C BRINDLE & M D BRINDLE 6901 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 37 06-116-21-34-0020 JAMES D & HEIDI S CARSELLO 6902 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 38 06-116-21-34-0032 R & J GECKLER 6905 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 39 06-116-21-34-0033 P B RAYNAUD & S A LUDWIG 6909 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 40 06-116-21-34-0025 S GARCIA & M CANONIERO 6912 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 41 06-116-21-34-0034 J A MILLER & M A MILLER 6913 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 42 06-116-21-34-0026 P A BILGER & D L BILGER 6914 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 43 06-116-21-34-0027 E S SWOFFORD & J J SWOFFORD 6916 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 44 06-116-21-34-0035 E W ROSE & K J ROSE 6917 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ 45 06-116-21-34-0036 M T PHILBIN & T A PHILBIN 6921 PAIUTE DR 1 15,600.00$ INDIAN TRAILS B/C NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-452 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 46 06-116-21-34-0028 B N MAXWELL & E M MAXWELL 6604 PAIUTE PASS 1 15,600.00$ 47 06-116-21-34-0029 K H AHMANN & M R AHMANN 6608 PAIUTE PASS 1 15,600.00$ 48 07-116-21-21-0040 J E VAN HOOMISSEN JR ET AL 6609 PAIUTE PASS 1 15,600.00$ 49 06-116-21-34-0030 HAIGANG CHEN & HUIZHEN ZHANG 6612 PAIUTE PASS 1 15,600.00$ 50 07-116-21-21-0015 THE KOVAL LIVING TRUST 6613 PAIUTE PASS 1 15,600.00$ 51 07-116-21-21-0014 CYNTHIA J DAOUD 6617 PAIUTE PASS 1 15,600.00$ 52 07-116-21-21-0013 J D OLSON & M L OLSON 6621 PAIUTE PASS 1 15,600.00$ 53 07-116-21-21-0012 B & L ZEMPEL 6625 PAIUTE PASS 1 15,600.00$ 54 06-116-21-33-0021 R V GUSTAFSON/A A GUSTAFSON 6800 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 55 06-116-21-33-0022 MICHAEL J SACKETT ET AL 6804 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 56 06-116-21-33-0023 MATTHEW C PRISCHMANN 6808 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 57 06-116-21-33-0020 DOLORES ANN SEASHORE 6809 SALLY LA 0.5 7,800.00$ 58 06-116-21-33-0024 P O REDDIN & S L REDDIN 6812 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 59 06-116-21-33-0030 G R & C L WOOD 6813 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 60 06-116-21-33-0025 BRUCE A PRIEBE 6816 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 61 06-116-21-33-0031 MAZHAR M CHAUDHRI & L MAZHAR 6817 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 62 06-116-21-33-0026 L G WHITE & W C WHITE 6820 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 63 06-116-21-33-0032 R L STEUBS & L K STEUBS 6821 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 64 06-116-21-33-0027 KATHERINE E COOLIDGE 6824 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 65 06-116-21-33-0033 SAM B JAYAKUMAR ET AL 6825 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 66 06-116-21-33-0028 B WADELL & N WADELL 6828 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 67 06-116-21-33-0034 D H CASPERSEN/K A CASPERSEN 6829 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 68 06-116-21-33-0029 SCOTT CURTIN 6832 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 69 06-116-21-33-0035 BRIDGET A GORMLEY 6833 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 70 06-116-21-33-0039 DON H EIDAM TRUST 6836 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 71 06-116-21-33-0036 M RINGKOB & J L RINGKOB 6837 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 72 06-116-21-33-0037 BRIAN J & VICTORIA J BAGLEY 6841 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 73 06-116-21-33-0038 J STEFFEN & C C C STEFFEN 6845 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 74 07-116-21-22-0017 W J SCHMIT ET AL TRUSTEES 7000 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 75 07-116-21-22-0010 STANLEY R DOBRIN ETAL 7001 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 76 07-116-21-22-0018 DAKOTA PROPERTIES I LLC 7004 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 77 07-116-21-22-0011 KATHERINE KLEYNHANS 7005 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 78 07-116-21-22-0019 JOHN EVANS & JESSICA EVANS 7008 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 79 07-116-21-22-0012 J G DORWEILER/S N DORWEILER 7009 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 80 07-116-21-22-0020 G B THOMAS & S L THOMAS 7012 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 81 07-116-21-22-0013 SYDNEY BAKER & MICHAEL BAKER 7013 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 82 07-116-21-22-0021 S T ANDERSON/C D ANDERSON 7016 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 83 07-116-21-22-0014 2015-3 IH2 BORROWER L P 7017 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 84 07-116-21-22-0022 LINDA J SIMMONS 7020 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 85 07-116-21-22-0015 JAY M FLEMING ET AL 7021 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 86 07-116-21-22-0023 A & H OBEID 7024 SALLY LA 1 15,600.00$ 87 07-116-21-22-0016 D W BENNER & J D BENNER 7025 SALLY LA 0.67 10,452.00$ 88 07-116-21-22-0024 WAYNE F ALEXANDER 7028 SALLY LA 0.67 10,452.00$ 89 06-116-21-34-0049 K P SWANSON & M M SWANSON 6500 SHAWNEE CIR 1 15,600.00$ 90 06-116-21-34-0048 BARTH W WARD 6504 SHAWNEE CIR 1 15,600.00$ 91 06-116-21-34-0041 T A & D S LYNNER 6505 SHAWNEE CIR 1 15,600.00$ 92 06-116-21-34-0042 TODD P & MELISSA ZETTLER 6509 SHAWNEE CIR 1 15,600.00$ 93 07-116-21-21-0008 P COMA & L I SKIME 7142 VALLEY VIEW RD 0 -$ Total 88.01 1,372,956.00$ *06-116-21-34-0061 is the auxillary PID; for assessing purposes, only the primary PID is used. ENGINEERING STUDY CHOWEN PARK A/B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Abbott Avenue, Beard Avenue, Chowen Avenue, Drew Avenue, Ewing Avenue, York Avenue, Zenith Avenue, West 59th Street IMPROVEMENT NOs. BA-451 AND A-279 NOVEMBER 26, 2018 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 42003 11-26-18 Aaron Ditzler Reg. No. Date Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of local bituminous streets and gravel alleys, installation of new concrete curb and gutter, construction of new concrete sidewalks and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $6,427,780. The estimated roadway construction cost is $2,412,000 and will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $9,000 per residential equivalent unit (REU). The estimated alley construction cost is $217,000 and will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $3,500 per REU. Utility improvements amount to $3,709,180 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. Sidewalk improvements are estimated to cost $89,600 and will be funded through the Pedestrian and Cyclists Safety (PACS) fund. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure.” This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, storm sewer system, sanitary sewer system and pedestrian facilities. LOCATION: The project includes Abbott Avenue, Beard Avenue, Chowen Avenue, Drew Avenue, Ewing Avenue, York Avenue, Zenith Avenue and West 59th Street. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways The roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed between 1925 and 1960 (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood, 1937 Most streets in the neighborhood do not have concrete curb and gutter. The average roadway width is 30’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb or edge of pavement). A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area performed by Braun Intertec showed the roadway section varies from 1.5” to 5” of pavement over a silty sand and sandy clay base. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc.). The average PCI for the City of Edina is 72 and the average PCI for Chowen Park A/B is 27. An example of the current pavement condition can be seen in Photo 2. Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 4 Photo 2: Existing Pavement Condition Alleys There are eight alleys within the Chowen Park A/B project area, as shown in Figure 2 and Table 1. Figure 2: Chowen Park A/B Alleys Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 5 Alley Extents Adjacent Properties Surface Abbott-Beard W 58th St to W 59th St 23 Concrete Abbott-Beard W 59th St to 130’ north of W 60th St 21 Concrete Zenith-Abbott W 58th St to W 59th St 24 Concrete Zenith-Abbott W 59th St to 130’ north of W 60th St 22 Gravel York-Zenith W 58th St to W 59th St 24 Concrete W 59th-W 60th York Ave to Zenith Ave 7 Gravel Xerxes-York W 59th St to 247’ north 10 Gravel Xerxes-York W 59th St to 130’ north of W 60th St 23 Gravel Table 1: Chowen Park A/B Alleys A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area performed by Braun Intertec showed the alley sections vary from 3.6” to 6” of gravel or 5.5” to 6.25” of concrete over a silty sand and clayey sand base. All eight alleys are currently maintained by the City (including snow plowing). Examples of the current condition of these alleys can be seen in Photos 3 and 4. Photo 3: Existing Gravel Alley Condition Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 6 Photo 4: Existing Concrete Alley Condition Traffic and Crash Data Staff measured traffic volumes and speeds at several locations within or near the neighborhood. Average daily traffic volumes within the neighborhood range between 87 and 349 vehicles per day with 85th percentile speeds between 22.1 and 29.5 miles per hour. Traffic and crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities There are no existing pedestrian facilities within the project area; however there are sidewalks immediately adjacent to the project area on France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, as well as a sidewalk on Beard Avenue south of West 60th Street (see Appendix B). Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area; however there are bike lanes immediately adjacent to the project area on West 58th Street (see Appendix C). Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system consists of 9” vitrified clay pipe (VCP) installed between 1949 and 1958. Historical records indicate there have been few sewer back-ups or blockages in the area (see Appendix D). Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 7 Watermain The watermain system consists of 6” cast iron pipe (CIP) installed between 1949 and 1958. The overall system has experienced a relatively large number of breaks (see Appendix D). The fire hydrants are original to the neighborhood. Many homes in the neighborhood were constructed prior to the availability of municipal water. Although several have had private wells properly sealed, City records suggest many more remain unsealed. Based on Utility Billing records, there are no properties in the project area that rely on private wells for domestic water. Storm Sewer The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundaries of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The system consists of 12” bituminous-coated corrugated metal pipe (CMP) and 15” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) installed between 1953 and 1963. There are relatively few storm sewer inlets and pipes located within the project area. About half of the streets within the project area drain to the north and eventually discharge into Minnehaha Creek; the remainder drain to the south and eventually discharge into Lake Pamela (and subsequently, Minnehaha Creek). Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications and cable utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are a combination of overheard and underground facilities located in backyards or along the boulevards. Street lighting consists of standard “cobra head” lights mounted on wooden poles located throughout the project area as shown in Appendix E. DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendix B, there is a proposed sidewalk on Beard Avenue between West 58th Street and West 60th Street. Appendix C shows no proposed bicycle facilities within the project area. 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 8 children, seniors and the disabled. Replacement of the pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Existing right-of-way will be repurposed to provide new multimodal transportation facilities, which in combination with existing and planned facilities, will form a multimodal network within the neighborhood. Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems. Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Reductions in impervious surfaces benefit water quality, and may lessen the demand for chemicals to manage snow and ice (such as chloride). Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place pipe liners. This project will also reduce inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix F. 2018 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan The CWRMP identified multiple areas of flood inundation within the project area for both the 10-percent and 1-percent-annual-chance flood event (also referred to as the 10-year and 100-year frequency event, respectively). The first area was identified at the intersection of Chowen Avenue and West 60th Street, extending approximately 750’ north on Chowen Avenue (see Figure 3). Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 9 Figure 3: Chowen Avenue and West 60th Street Flood Zone (LP_27) 12-15 structures on the 5900 block of Chowen Avenue could be impacted, as well as 8-10 structures on the 6000 block. A second area was identified between the 5800 blocks of Chowen Avenue and Beard Avenue (See Figure 4). Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 10 Figure 4: Chowen Avenue/Beard Avenue Backyard Flood Zone (LP_24) A backyard depression area collects approximately three acres of stormwater from the neighboring properties and is not connected to the City’s storm sewer system; 8-11 structures may be impacted. Both areas (LP_27 and LP_24) were included in the 2014 STS-406 Improvement Project prepared by Barr Engineering, which provided a detailed evaluation of several areas with high flood potential that corresponded to anticipated roadway reconstruction. Relevant portions of this report can be found in Appendix G. A third area was identified at the intersection of Abbott Avenue and West 60th Street and extending approximately 315’ east on West 60th Street (see Figure 5). Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 11 Figure 5: Abbott Avenue/West 60th Street Flood Zone (LP_20) This modeled inundation area primarily impacts the roadway section of West 60th Street between Abbott Avenue and Zenith Avenue, but could impact the structures at 3219 West 60th Street and 5928 Abbott Avenue. Potential manhole surcharging was also identified in the 1-percent and 10-percent- annual-chance events. Staff Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. They support installation of concrete curb and gutter, as well as replacement of deficient watermain components (including fire hydrants, gate valves and water services). They also recommend replacement of existing CMP within the project area. Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire Departments. The Fire Department supports watermain improvements, including adding fire hydrants as necessary to meet public safety standards. They also note that temporary fire hydrants should be of a consistent style for ease of access, and that emergency access should be maintained at all times during construction. Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 12 Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 25, 2018, a draft engineering study was provided for review. At this meeting, a motion was made to write an advisory communication to Council in support of the Beard Avenue sidewalk construction within the project area. Relevant minutes from the ETC meetings are included in Appendix H. 2015 University of Minnesota Neighborhood Traffic Study As part a Capstone Design for Civil Engineering course through the University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, a team of engineering students (DKMBJ Engineering) investigated vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the Strachauer Park, Chowen Park and Creek Knoll neighborhoods, as well as evaluated existing utilization of on-street parking. Within the Chowen Park neighborhood, they found no reason to implement special parking considerations on the local streets and recommended the City proceed with incorporating elements of Living Streets in the reconstruction of these roadways. Relevant portions of the final report can be found in Appendix I. Residents As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3 years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to three open houses between September 2015 and September 2017. Materials from these meetings are available upon request. On June 4, 2018, residents were asked to complete a questionnaire, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems within the project area. The questionnaire was completed by 94 of 308 property owners, a return rate of 31%. The following is a summary of feedback received from residents: • 46 of 94 (49%*) were concerned or very concerned with the speed of traffic in the neighborhood; 48 (51%) were not concerned. • 49 (52%) were concerned or very concerned with motorist behavior in the neighborhood; 44 (47%) were not concerned. • 57 (61%) identified an unsafe intersection within the neighborhood. • 69 (73%) walk, run, or jog in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. • 15 (27%) ride a bicycle in the neighborhood at least 2-3 times per week. • 24 (26%) reported parking on the street at least 2-3 times per week; 48 (51%) reported parking on the street less than once per month. • 19 (20%) identified localized drainage problems in the neighborhood. *Percentages based on number of returned surveys The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix J. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on August 13, 2018 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood and others proposed for construction in 2019. The meeting was attended by 43 residents representing 33 properties within the project area. Materials from this meeting can be found in Appendix K. Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 13 Relevant correspondence from residents regarding the project can be found in Appendix L. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. Roadways Typical Section The bituminous roadways are proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. Due to an existing lack of aggregate base, recycling the existing pavement for use as base material in the new roadways is not practical. Instead, 8” of aggregate material will be hauled in, graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous base and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. All roadways within the project area are designated as Local Streets in the Living Streets Plan. Per this plan’s design guidelines, Local Streets have a typical width of 27’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb) without sidewalks or 24’ with a 5’ sidewalk on one side. The majority of the roadways are proposed to be reconstructed to 27’; Beard Avenue is proposed to be reconstructed to 24’ due to the proposed sidewalk (see Pedestrian Facilities below). Parking The City’s Living Streets Policy evaluates on-street parking based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand and costs of construction and maintenance. As all of the land use in this neighborhood is residential, and given the existing demand for parking, staff believes that two-sided parking on most of the roadways within the project area is appropriate. One-sided parking is proposed for the east side of Beard Avenue due to the proposed sidewalk (see Pedestrian Facilities below). As parking is preferred on the same side of the road as the sidewalk for pedestrian safety, the location of parking is determined by the location of the sidewalk. The existing and proposed street widths, sidewalk widths and parking recommendations are shown in Table 3. Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 14 Street Existing Roadway Width¹ (face to face), feet Proposed Roadway Width (face to face), feet Sidewalk Width, feet Boulevard Width, feet Parking Abbott Avenue 30 27 - - Two-sided Beard Avenue 30 24 5 5 East side only Chowen Avenue 30 27 - - Two-sided Drew Avenue 30 27 - - Two-sided Ewing Avenue 30 27 - - Two-sided York Avenue 30 27 - - Two-sided Zenith Avenue 30 27 - - Two-sided West 59th Street 28 27 - - Two-sided ¹Existing roadway width is measured from edge of bituminous to edge of bituminous on streets with no curb and gutter Table 3: Street Widths, Sidewalks and Parking Roadway Signage All traffic signage within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix E). All new signs will conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Alleys On October 28, 2016, staff received a formal petition from residents within the project area requesting to pave one of the gravel alleys. The petition was signed by 11 of 23 properties adjacent to this alley, which lies between West 59th Street, Xerxes Avenue, West 60th Street and York Avenue. The full petition can be found in Appendix M. It is proposed to install bituminous pavement on the four gravel alleys within the project area to improve maintenance operations. Minor drainage improvements will be completed by grade adjustments of the gravel and pavement. Based on their current condition, no repairs are proposed for the concrete alleys. Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities A 5’ boulevard-style concrete sidewalk is proposed on the east side of Beard Avenue between West 58th Street and West 60th Street. This sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalk on Beard Avenue south of West 60th Street and to future pedestrian facilities on West 60th Street, West 58th Street and Beard Avenue north of West 58th Street. Figure 6 shows all existing and proposed pedestrian facilities. Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 15 Figure 6: Existing and Proposed Pedestrian Facilities Exact locations were selected by staff based on existing topography, connections to existing facilities and private utility conflicts. The grass boulevard that will separate the new curb and the proposed sidewalk will be 5’-wide for the majority of the length of the street, but may vary depending on existing conflicts. The separation from vehicle traffic creates a more pedestrian-friendly environment and is preferred by Public Works for snow storage. The extra width needed for the sidewalk and boulevard will be balanced between both sides of the street, where feasible. All adjacent pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). As the proposed sidewalk is not along a Municipal State Aid roadway nor included in the City’s Active Routes to School Plan, it will not be maintained by City staff. Bicycle Facilities There are no proposed bicycle facilities in this project area. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer Given the significant areas of modeled flood inundation within the project area, Engineering reached out to several property owners to discuss their experiences with flooding in the neighborhood. Through those conversations, few property owners voiced concerns about flooding after heavy rainfall events. This raised concerns among staff that stormwater that would be expected to pond during these events may be entering the sanitary sewer system through illicit connections or pipe defects. Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) was hired by the City to conduct smoke testing in portions of the sanitary sewer system within the Chowen Park neighborhood to determine whether this assumption was accurate; no defects were Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 16 found to support this assumption. The full testing report can be found in Appendix N. The sanitary sewer main has been televised, and portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) methods. These repairs will address the issues of sags, cracks and groundwater infiltration into the sewer main. The manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain Echologics, LLC was hired by the City to perform a non-invasive pipe condition assessment on the watermain within the project area, and staff has reviewed historical break data to determine the extent of improvements needed. All of the existing watermain will be replaced using a combination of pipebursting and open cut methods, and all water services will be replaced. New watermain will be installed along West 59th Street between Beard Avenue and York Avenue to improve distribution within the neighborhood. All gate valves and fire hydrants within the project area will be replaced and, if needed, additional hydrants will be installed to meet current public safety standards. The new fire hydrants will include the Storz nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. As part of the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan, staff plans to engage property owners who have unsealed private wells and encourage them to have them properly sealed. Storm Sewer Based on existing conditions and the scope of utility work, new concrete curb and gutter will be installed throughout the project, providing a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater. The storm sewer network will have modifications to resolve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. The STS-406 study evaluated several options to address the areas of flood inundation on Chowen Avenue and West 60th Street: Option A: Construct stormwater infiltration swales within the right-of-way and install new storm sewer pipes to drain the backyard depression area Option B: Construct stormwater infiltration swales and perforated underground storage pipes within the right-of-way and install a new storm sewer pipes to drain the backyard depression area Option C: Install new storm sewer pipes to drain the backyard depression area, as well as along West 60th Street and France Avenue Option D: Install new storm sewer pipes to drain the backyard depression area, as well as upsize the existing pipes south of West 60th Street While Options A and B would exemplify Living Streets principles (specifically, the inclusion of green infrastructure components), these options were determined to be Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 17 infeasible based on their high costs compared to the level of flood protection improvement they provide. Option D was evaluated in 2015 prior to the reconstruction of roadways south of West 60th Street (Strachauer Park A) and was determined to be infeasible based on costs and construction impacts to adjacent residential properties. It is proposed to extend storm sewer pipes from Chowen Avenue and West 60th Street to the north along Chowen Avenue. Connection to the backyard depression area between Chowen Avenue and Beard Avenue is not proposed as part of this project due to disinterest from adjacent property owners and the lack of easements such work would require; however, the proposed storm sewer pipes on Chowen Avenue would allow for a connection to the backyards in the future. Per Option C, it is anticipated that new storm sewer pipes will be installed along West 60th Street and France Avenue as part of a future project (as neither street is included in the project limits for Chowen Park A/B). It is also anticipated that the area of flood inundation at the intersection of Abbott Avenue and West 60th Street can also be addressed as part of a future project on West 60th Street. Private Utilities Staff met with representatives of several private utility companies on October 12, 2018 to discuss the proposed 2019 reconstruction projects and preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. Currently, the City does not have a standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved. Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies. The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections; therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting. RIGHT-OF-WAY/ EASEMENTS: Existing roadway right-of-way in this neighborhood is 60’; alley right-of-way is 14’. It is anticipated that the majority of this project can be constructed within existing ROW. Many properties have vegetation, boulders, retaining walls or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary work. A ROW permit from Hennepin County will be required for work that will occur at West 59th Street and Xerxes Avenue. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $6,427,780 (see Table 4). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 18 Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway Total: $ 2,412,000 Special Assessments Alley Total: $ 217,000 Special Assessments Sanitary Sewer $ 377,180 Watermain $ 1,952,140 Storm Sewer $ 1,379,860 Utility Total: $ 3,709,180 City Utility Funds Sidewalk Total: $ 89,600 PACS Fund Project Total: $ 6,427,780 Table 4: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statues. Roadway Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 268 roadway residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Chowen Park A/B project area. The estimated assessment per REU is $9,000 (see Figure 7). Figure 7: Preliminary Roadway Assessment Map The formulas for calculating REUs are described below: Single-Family Residential Lots with No Roadway Access 3100, 3104, 3108, 3112, 3204, 3208, 3212, 3304, 3308, 3312, 3404, 3408 and 3412 West 60th Street; 5828, 5832, 5836, 5844, 5904, 5908, 5912, 5916, 5920, 5924, 5928 and 5932 Xerxes Avenue; = 0 REU (no direct access to roadways within project area) Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 19 Single-Family Residential Corner Lots 5800 and 5801 Abbott Avenue; 5800, 5801 and 5936 Beard Avenue; 5800, 5801, 5932 and 5933 Chowen Avenue; 5800, 5801, 5932 and 5933 Drew Avenue; 5800, 5801 and 5945 Ewing Avenue; 3116, 3200, 3216, 3300, 3316, 3400, 3416 and 3808 West 60th Street; 5848 and 5900 Xerxes Avenue; 5800 and 5801 York Avenue; 5800 and 5801 Zenith Avenue; = 0.5 REU (partial access off West 58th Street, West 60th Street and Xerxes Avenue) All other properties are single-family residential located entirely within the project area and will be subjected to an assessment of 1 REU. Alley Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 62 REUs adjacent to the gravel alleys. The estimated assessment per alley REU is $3,500 (see Figure 8). Figure 8: Preliminary Alley Assessment Map The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix O. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the past and future tasks to be performed related to the project: Engineering Study Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-451 and A-279 November 26, 2018 20 Neighborhood Open House (all 2017/2018 projects) September 28, 2015 Neighborhood Open House (all 2018/2019 projects) September 26, 2016 Neighborhood Open House (all 2019/2020 projects) September 25, 2017 Neighborhood Informational Meeting (all 2019 projects) August 13, 2018 ETC Engineering Study Review October 25, 2018 Receive Engineering Study December 4, 2018 Public Improvement Hearing December 10, 2018 Bid Opening March/April 2019 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2019 Complete Construction Fall 2019 Final Assessment Hearing October 2020 RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2019 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Chowen Park A/B neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Traffic and Crash Data B. Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C. Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks E. Streetlights and Signs F. Living Streets Plan G. STS-406 Improvement Project Report H. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes I. DKMBJ Engineering Traffic Study Report J. Resident Questionnaire K. Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials L. Correspondence from Residents M. Gravel Alley Petition N. SEH Smoke Testing Report O. Preliminary Assessment Roll APPENDIX A Traffic and Crash Data Chowen Park A/B Traffic and Crash Data Traffic Data Location Description Year Average Daily Traffic 85th % Speed, mph 1 Drew Ave 2018 191 23.4 2 Chowen Ave 2012 241 29.1 2010 313 29.5 3 Beard Ave 2018 323 27.6 2010 349 27.0 4 Zenith Ave 2018 172 23.6 5 W 59th St 2018 87 22.1 2008 109 23.2 Crash Data Location Severity Year Month Time A Property Damage – Collision with Parked Motor Vehicle 2010 December 12:00 p.m. Non-Incapacitating Injury – Collision with Motor Vehicle 2007 June 5:05 p.m. B Property Damage – Collision with Motor Vehicle 2006 June 5:20 p.m. C Property Damage – Collision with Parked Motor Vehicle 2015 February 2:42 p.m. D Possible Injury – Collision with Parked Motor Vehicle 2007 April 5:06 p.m. Property Damage – Collision with Motor Vehicle 2006 May 1:46 p.m. Property Damage – Collision with Hydrant 2006 April 4:06 p.m. E Property Damage – Collision with Motor Vehicle 2009 September 8:35 a.m. F Non-Incapacitating Injury – Collision with Motor Vehicle 2007 June 5:05 p.m. G Possible Injury – Collision with Parked Motor Vehicle 2013 April 10:55 p.m. Property Damage – Collision with Motor Vehicle 2012 April 4:20 p.m. Property Damage – Collision with Motor Vehicle 2011 September 2:00 p.m. Property Damage – Collision with Parked Motor Vehicle 2010 December 5:00 p.m. Property Damage – Collision with Motor Vehicle 2010 March 11:20 a.m. Non-Incapacitating Injury – Collision with Pedestrian 2007 April 3:24 p.m. Chowen Park A/B Traffic and Crash Data APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Braemar Golf Course Bredesen Park Rosland Park Pamela Park Lewis Park Highlands Park Walnut Ridge Park Todd Park Garden Park Heights Park Van Valkenburg Park Fred Richards Golf Course Creek Valley Park Lake Edina Park Krahl Hill Normandale Park Weber Field Park Arneson Acres Park Countryside Park Alden Park Utley Park Yorktown Park Wooddale Park Arden Park York Park Cornelia Park Strachauer Park Fox MeadowPark Edinborough Park KojetinPark McGuirePark BirchcrestPark SherwoodPark Melody LakePark Williams Park ChowenPark St. John'sPark TingdalePark BrowndalePark GrandviewSquare FrankTupa Park Courtney Fields ?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y Mud Lake )y ?ÞA@ ?úA@ Lake Edina Mir r o r L a k e Lake Cornelia Arrowhead Lake Highlands Lake Indianhead Lake Mel o d y L a k e Lake Pamela Hawkes Lake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake Minn e h a h a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine M i l e C r e e k Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERN O N A V E FRANCE AVE SXERXES AVE SCAHILL RD70TH ST W 66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44TH ST W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W GLEASON RD70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLE Y V I E W R D VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W / Engineering Dept May 2018 Pedestrian Facilities Proposed FacilitiesExisting Facilities Existing Sidewalk Existing Park Pathway Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail New Primary Sidewalk New Secondary Sidewalk New Shared Use Path Upgrade to Shared Use Path Twin Loops Facility APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map ?ÞA@ )y ?úA@ Mud Lake Lake Edina Mir r o r L a k e Lake Cornelia Arrowhead Lake Highlands Lake Indianhead Lake Mel o d y L a k e Lake Pamela Hawkes Lake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake Alden Park Van Valkenburg Park Fox Meadow Park Highlands Park Todd Park Weber FieldPark Kojetin Park Browndale Park Wooddale ParkWilliams Park Utley Park Frank Tupa Park Sherwood Park Arden Park York Park Chowen Park Pamela Park St Johns Park Strachauer Park Rosland Park Bristol ParkCornelia Park Arneson Acres Park Lake Edina ParkFred Richards Golf Course YorktownPark Edinborough Park Garden Park Melody Lake Park Tingdale Park Countryside Park Bredesen Park Walnut RidgePark Krahl Hill Creek Valley Park Heights Park Normandale Park McGuire Park Lewis ParkBraemar Park and Golf Course (Courtney Fields) Minn e h a h a C r e e k Nine Mile Creek Nine M i l e C r e e k Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBlake RdVernon Ave France Ave SXerxes Ave SCahill Rd70th St W Interlachen Blvd Maloney Ave 44th St W 50th St W 54th St W 58th St W Gleason Rd70th St W 76th St W Dewey Hill Rd Valley V i e w R d Valley View Rd Minnesota Dr78th St W Wooddale AveTracy AveParklawn AveConcord AveBenton Ave Gleason RdMalibu RdGreen Farms RdMcCauley Trl SMirror Lakes DrLi n c o l n D rWashington AveDivision St Vernon AveGolf Ter Code AveWilryan AveNormandale RdWest Shore DrCornelia DrFrance Ave SYork Ave S77th St WOhms LnHilary Ln Olin g e r B l v d 66th St W Antrim Rd63rd St W Xerxes Ave S69th St W Bush Lake RdMetro Blvd66th St W 62nd St W Valley Ln Brookside Ave?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y 74th St W Valley Vi e w R d Engineering Dept May 2018 / O:\Users\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Asbuilts.mxd Proposed Bicycle Facilities New Shared Use Path Upgrade to Shared Use Path Standard Bike Lane New Buffered Bike Lane Upgrade to Buffered Bike Lane Neighborhood Slow Street Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Twin Loops Facility APPENDIX D Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks 5920 5845 5913 5841 5909 5825 5833 5845 5828 5908 5805 5920 5908 59215920 5845 5921 5844 5901 5925 5845 58045805 33045805 5817 5732 6001 5809 5728 5837 5905 5732 5808 5813 5833 5725 5800 6005-07 3219 5740 6021 5804 5836 5833 5812 5829 5840 5913 5924 5909 5829 5828 5908 3813-15 5928 6020 6000 5924 5916 5837 5836 5912 5901 32056001 5932 6001 5929 5725 6008 6004 5933 5933 6005 6000 6009 60006000 6008 6000 5924 5801 5728 6001 5729 3201 5917 5828 5737 5733 5925 5917 5821 5920 6005 6008 5729 5925 6000 6012 5928 5728 6008 5928 6004 6000 6004 6001 6009 5724 5924 6009 5921 6005 5737 5925 5805 6004 6021 3808 5737 6008 5733 5736 5721 6004 5929 5733 5929 6004 31136005 6009 5908 5736 5925 5820 5933 5733 5732 6008 5733 5924 5740 5925 5929 5824 57295728 5725 5729 5829 5820 5916 5821 5732 5729 5736 5813 5932 5732 5737 5832 5917 5909 5932 5741 5916 5832 5900 5828 5908 5900 5833 5908 5901 5825 5724 5933 5825 5908 5945 5904 5928 5829 5900 5741 5901 5725 5824 5916 5724 5824 5905 5909 5917 5904 5829 5733 5813 6005 6009 5909 5836 5905 5724 5912 5812 5904 5912 5921 5912 5808 58285829 5809 5812 5913 5732 5728 5812 5913 5836 5808 5816 5728 5816 5913 5825 5936 5833 5720 5837 5808 5821 5920 5820 5824 5832 5832 5817 5824 5833 5924 5913 5836 58255825 5804 5829 5816 5921 5920 5817 5736 5732 5808 5816 5828 5821 5812 5809 5729 5820 5736 5909 572157245724 5728 5818 5809 5805 5733 5728 5725 5921 5800 5733 5732 31055932 5928 34005725 3200310033005800 5805 33165800 341632165812 5932 5729 31165933 5801 5916 31115904 58045805 5817 5917 5900 5929 5804 5901 5928 5932 5925 5924 5905 5821 5809 5912 5816 5908 5801 5821 5808 5813 5916 320458005800 5916 5812 58015801 5913 5817 5904 5933 5821 5828 5824 5905 5816 32085809 5929 5920 5917 5909 5801 5921 5812 5905 5813 5904 34045837 5800 5805 5929 5820 5824 5844 5825 5836 5817 5900 5801 5813 5904 5820 5808 5840 5820 5933 5925 31125917 5816 5828 5905 33085928 5809 5817 5800 5836 5808 31045832 5924 5837 5917 5817 5837 5801 5813 5821 58415841 59005901 5825 5829 5916 5901 5840 340833125848 5912 5836 5844 5832 34125913 5845 5841 5912 5809 58045804 59205921 58325832 5824 31085900 5909 32125833 5912 5844 5837 5744 5736 5740 5848 59045901 PROJECT LIMITS W 58TH ST FRANCE AVEW 59TH ST W 60TH STEWING AVEDREW AVECHOWEN AVEBEARD AVEABBOTT AVEZENITH AVEYORK AVEXERXES AVE/ Engineering DeptOctober 2018 Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksChowen Park A and B Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-451CITYOFEDINAMI N NESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e Sewer Blocks Watermain Breaks APPENDIX E Streetlights and Signs 5920 5845 5913 5841 5909 5825 5833 5845 5828 5908 5805 5920 5908 59215920 5845 5921 5844 5901 5925 5845 58045805 33045805 5817 5732 6001 5809 5728 5837 5905 5732 5808 5813 5833 5725 5800 6005-07 3219 5740 6021 5804 5836 5833 5812 5829 5840 5913 5924 5909 5829 5828 5908 3813-15 5928 6020 6000 5924 5916 5837 5836 5912 5901 32056001 5932 6001 5929 5725 6008 6004 5933 5933 6005 6000 6009 60006000 6008 6000 5924 5801 5728 6001 5729 3201 5917 5828 5737 5733 5925 5917 5821 5920 6005 6008 5729 5925 6000 6012 5928 5728 6008 5928 6004 6000 6004 6001 6009 5724 5924 6009 5921 6005 5737 5925 5805 6004 6021 3808 5737 6008 5733 5736 5721 6004 5929 5733 5929 6004 31136005 6009 5736 5925 5820 5933 5733 5732 6008 5733 5924 5740 5925 5929 5824 57295728 5725 5729 5829 5820 5916 5821 5732 5729 5736 5813 5932 5732 5737 5832 5917 5909 5932 5741 5916 5832 5900 5828 5908 5900 5833 5908 5901 5825 5724 5933 5825 5908 5945 5904 5928 5829 5900 5741 5901 5725 5824 5916 5724 5824 5905 5909 5917 5904 5829 5733 5813 6005 6009 5909 5836 5905 5724 5912 5812 5904 5912 5921 5912 5808 58285829 5809 5812 5913 5732 5728 5812 5913 5836 5808 5816 5728 5816 5913 5825 5936 5833 5720 5837 5808 5821 5920 5820 5824 5832 5832 5817 5824 5833 5924 5913 5836 58255825 5804 5829 5816 5921 5920 5817 5736 5732 5808 5816 5828 5821 5812 5809 5729 5820 5736 5909 572157245724 5728 5818 5809 5805 5733 5728 5725 5921 5800 5733 5732 31055932 5928 34005725 3200310033005800 5805 33165800 341632165812 5932 5729 31165933 5801 5916 31115904 58045805 5817 5917 5900 5929 5804 5901 5928 5932 5925 5924 5905 5821 5809 5912 5816 5908 5801 5821 5808 5813 5916 320458005800 5916 5812 58015801 5913 5817 5904 5933 5821 5828 5824 5905 5816 32085809 5929 5920 5917 5909 5801 5921 5812 5905 5813 5904 34045837 5800 5805 5929 5820 5824 5844 5825 5836 5817 5900 5801 5813 5904 5820 5808 5840 5820 5933 5925 31125917 5816 5828 5905 33085928 5809 5817 5800 5836 5808 31045832 5924 5837 5917 5817 5837 5801 5813 5821 58415841 59005901 5825 5829 5916 5901 5840 340833125848 5912 5836 5844 5832 34125913 5845 5841 5912 5809 58045804 59205921 58325832 5824 31085900 5909 32125833 5912 5844 5837 5744 5736 5740 5848 59045901 Project Limits W 58TH ST FRANCE AVEW 59TH ST W 60TH STEWING AVEDREW AVECHOWEN AVEBEARD AVEABBOTT AVEZENITH AVEYORK AVEXERXES AVE/ Engineering Dept July 2018 StreetlightsChowen Park A and B Neigborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-451CITYOFEDINAMI N NESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e Xcel Energy Cobrahead Drop Lense Wood Round Xcel Energy Cobrahead Drop Lense Wood Round !"$!"$!"$!"$!"$!"$ !"$ !"$ 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234123412341234123412341234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234 1234!"$-./0 !"$!"$-./0!"$-./0 !"$!"$!"$!"$ !"$ !"$ 5920 5845 5913 5841 5909 5825 5833 5845 5828 5908 5805 5920 5908 59215920 5845 5921 5844 5901 5925 5845 58045805 33045805 5817 5732 6001 5809 5728 5837 5905 5732 5808 5813 5833 5725 5800 6005-07 3219 5740 6021 5804 5836 5833 5812 5829 5840 5913 5924 5909 5829 5828 5908 3813-15 5928 6020 6000 5924 5916 5837 5836 5912 5901 32056001 5932 6001 5929 5725 6008 6004 5933 5933 6005 6000 6009 60006000 6008 6000 5924 5801 5728 6001 5729 3201 5917 5828 5737 5733 5925 5917 5821 5920 6005 6008 5729 5925 6000 6012 5928 5728 6008 5928 6004 6000 6004 6001 6009 5724 5924 6009 5921 6005 5737 5925 5805 6004 6021 3808 5737 6008 5733 5736 5721 6004 5929 5733 5929 6004 31136005 6009 5736 5925 5820 5933 5733 5732 6008 5733 5924 5740 5925 5929 5824 57295728 5725 5729 5829 5820 5916 5821 5732 5729 5736 5813 5932 5732 5737 5832 5917 5909 5932 5741 5916 5832 5900 5828 5908 5900 5833 5908 5901 5825 5724 5933 5825 5908 5945 5904 5928 5829 5900 5741 5901 5725 5824 5916 5724 5824 5905 5909 5917 5904 5829 5733 5813 6005 6009 5909 5836 5905 5724 5912 5812 5904 5912 5921 5912 5808 58285829 5809 5812 5913 5732 5728 5812 5913 5836 5808 5816 5728 5816 5913 5825 5936 5833 5720 5837 5808 5821 5920 5820 5824 5832 5832 5817 5824 5833 5924 5913 5836 58255825 5804 5829 5816 5921 5920 5817 5736 5732 5808 5816 5828 5821 5812 5809 5729 5820 5736 5909 572157245724 5728 5818 5809 5805 5733 5728 5725 5921 5800 5733 5732 31055932 5928 34005725 3200310033005800 5805 33165800 341632165812 5932 5729 31165933 5801 5916 31115904 58045805 5817 5917 5900 5929 5804 5901 5928 5932 5925 5924 5905 5821 5809 5912 5816 5908 5801 5821 5808 5813 5916 320458005800 5916 5812 58015801 5913 5817 5904 5933 5821 5828 5824 5905 5816 32085809 5929 5920 5917 5909 5801 5921 5812 5905 5813 5904 34045837 5800 5805 5929 5820 5824 5844 5825 5836 5817 5900 5801 5813 5904 5820 5808 5840 5820 5933 5925 31125917 5816 5828 5905 33085928 5809 5817 5800 5836 5808 31045832 5924 5837 5917 5817 5837 5801 5813 5821 58415841 59005901 5825 5829 5916 5901 5840 340833125848 5912 5836 5844 5832 34125913 5845 5841 5912 5809 58045804 59205921 58325832 5824 31085900 5909 32125833 5912 5844 5837 5744 5736 5740 5848 59045901 Project Limits W 58TH ST FRANCE AVEW 59TH ST W 60TH STEWING AVEDREW AVECHOWEN AVEBEARD AVEABBOTT AVEZENITH AVEYORK AVEXERXES AVE/ Engineering Dept July 2018 SignsChowen Park A and B Neigborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-451CITYOFEDINAMI N NESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e APPENDIX F Living Streets Plan Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy APPENDIX G STS-406 Improvement Project Report STS-406 Improvement Project Part 1: Project Areas 1, 3, and 7 Prepared for City of Edina February 17, 2014 4700 West 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435-4803 Phone: 952.832.2600 Fax: 952.832.2601 1.0 Project Background The City of Edina Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (December 2011) was developed to address current and future stormwater issues, especially those related to future development and redevelopment. The plan addresses stormwater runoff management and flood control, water quality management, and wetlands protection through establishment of stormwater planning policies and recommendations. This plan serves as a master plan for the City’s water resources management and storm drainage system improvements. One of the goals of the Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan (CWRMP) is to provide stormwater runoff management and flood control. The CWRMP establishes design criteria for the City’s preferred level of service for stormwater management and level of protection from flooding provided to residents of the city. These design criteria serve as a target for the City as redevelopment occurs and infrastructure improvements are considered. Another goal of the CWRMP is to provide water quality management for the water bodies throughout the city. Water quality management policies and design standards have also been established to protect the water quality of the waterbodies within the city. The CWRMP identifies several areas throughout the city where the desired 100-year level of flood protection may not currently be provided, based on results of the hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analyses conducted as part of the CWRMP development. Since identification of these areas, the City has been evaluating flood improvement options on a case-by-case basis, in conjunction with nearby street reconstruction or other improvement projects. The STS-406 Improvement Project includes a detailed evaluation of several areas with high flood potential that correspond to anticipated street reconstruction projects within the upcoming 5 years. This report summarizes our flood protection analyses and conclusions for the following project areas within the STS-406 Improvement Project: (1) Project Area 1 a. Ashcroft Lane b. Barrie Road and York Avenue (2) Project Area 3 a. West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue (3) Project Area 7 a. France Avenue and Scott Terrace Locations of Project Areas 1, 3, and 7 are shown in Figure 1-1. All elevations included in this report reflect Mean Sea Level (MSL) elevations in feet using the NGVD 29 vertical datum. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 1 2.0 Project Approach 2.1 Flood Protection Detailed hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of the flood areas within Project Areas 1, 3, and 7 was conducted using the XP-SWMM models that were originally developed in 2003 as part of the CWRMP. Updates made to the models as part of this project are described below and within the subsequent sections of this report. 2.1.1 Changes to Published Precipitation Depths In 2013, NOAA’s National Weather Service (NWS) published new precipitation frequency estimates (“Atlas 14”) for the state of Minnesota and other Midwestern states. The Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates, which are the estimated rainfall depths for various rainfall durations and exceedance probabilities, replace the precipitation estimates published in Technical Paper No. 40 Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States (“TP 40”). The Atlas 14 rainfall frequency estimates indicate a significant increase in the depth of the 50-year and 100-year frequency rainfall events (i.e., rainfall events with exceedance probabilities of 2% and 1%, respectively) across Minnesota and neighboring states, as compared with TP 40 estimates. For the Minneapolis/St. Paul area, the increases in 24-hour duration precipitation depths over TP 40 are as high 25% (Figure 2-1). These precipitation depth increases are of concern, as they can have serious implications for how stormwater systems are designed and managed. Figure 2-1 Atlas 14 percent of change in precipitation depth for the 24-hour duration storm, as compared to TP 40 The hydrologic and hydraulic modeling conducted for and summarized in the CWRMP used a 24-hour rainfall depth of 6.0 inches based on TP 40, and the SCS Type II nested distribution. For this project, the rainfall depths used in the models were updated based on Atlas 14 precipitation estimates for Edina (Table 2-1). A nested rainfall distribution was developed using precipitation frequency estimates for Edina (Coordinates: 44.8716, -93.3762). The depth-duration data were downloaded from NOAA’s Precipitation Frequency Data Server (PFDS) at http://dipper.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/. Nested distributions for selected P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 2 recurrence intervals events were created by using the Frequency Storm utility found in the meteorological modeling component of HEC-HMS to produce 24-hour hyetographs with 5-minute intervals. Flood frequency data is often also described in terms of a percentage of risk, or annual exceedance probability. For example, the 100-year frequency flood inundation area represents an area that has a 1 percent chance of flooding (1-percent-annual chance flood) for any given year. Structures located within the 1-percent-annual chance flood inundation area have a 26 percent chance of flooding during the life of a standard 30-year mortgage. Table 2-1 24-hour duration rainfall depths using NOAA Atlas 14 for Edina, MN for a range of storm recurrence intervals Storm Recurrence Interval 24-hour Rainfall Depth (inches) Annual Exceedance Probability1 1-year 2.5 100% 2-year 2.9 50% 10-year 4.3 10% 25-year 5.4 4% 50-year 6.4 2% 100-year 7.5 1% 1 Annual Exceedance Probability refers to the percent chance of occurrence in any given year 2.1.2 Updated Elevation Data For each of the study areas, City staff conducted a topographic field survey of the flood inundation areas within the targeted subwatersheds. The topographic survey data was combined with 2011 LiDAR elevation data from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to refine the elevation/storage relationships used in the modeling analyses. The City’s survey also included low entry elevations for structures (including houses and detached garages) adjacent to the flood inundation areas within the targeted subwatersheds. The low entry elevations were used to define the flood improvement target elevations. 2.2 Water Quality Improvement While improving flood risk was the primary focus for Project Areas 1, 3 and 7, improvement options that provide multiple water resource benefits were identified and considered. In addition to quantifying flood improvement benefits, the improvement options were evaluated for volume reduction and pollutant removal using the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Minimal Impact Design Standards calculator (November 2012 version). P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 3 4.0 Project Area 3: Lake Pamela Subwatersheds LP_24 and LP_27 4.1 Problem Description Figure 4-1 shows the Project Area 3 study area. Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling of this area indicates that a flooding problem occurs at the West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue intersection, as well as in the backyard areas on the east side of the 5800 block of Chowen Avenue. The backyard depression area (Subwatershed LP_24) currently is not connected to the City storm sewer system and becomes inundated during large rainfall events, potentially impacting several adjacent structures. Stormwater from the backyard area will flow to Chowen Avenue via surface overflow at an elevation of 883.3 feet based on the City’s topographic survey. During the City’s field survey, several drain inlets were observed in the backyard area. Further investigation by City staff indicated that these drains were not connected to the City’s storm sewer or sanitary sewer systems, and appear to be French drain-type system(s). For purposes of this modeling analysis, it was assumed that these drains are not functional. Project Area 3 is drained by a storm sewer system that discharges into Lake Pamela (LP_26). The system was originally designed and constructed in the mid-1950s and thus was not sized in a manner consistent with the City’s current design criteria. The lack of sufficient capacity in the existing system results in flows backing up and pooling in the low area at the intersection of West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue during large storm events, potentially impacting several adjacent structures. The Project Area 3 neighborhood is one of the residential areas within Edina where significant residential redevelopment is anticipated. As houses are remodeled or torn down and rebuilt, the impervious footprint tends to increase from original construction conditions. This increase in impervious surface and/or directly-connected impervious surface can result in increased stormwater runoff rate and volume. The streets within the portion of the Project Area 3 study area east of France Avenue will be reconstructed in upcoming years (2014 – 2018). The upcoming street reconstruction may present unique opportunities for stormwater infrastructure improvements to reduce flood risk within Project Area 3 and improve the water quality being discharged to downstream Lake Pamela and Minnehaha Creek. 4.2 Model Updates The XP-SWMM hydrologic and hydraulic model for Project Area 3 was updated to reflect new rainfall depths as defined by NOAA Atlas 14. Because of the increase in rainfall depths, several additional overflows were added to the model within the Project Area 3 study area. The City provided topographic survey of the backyard depression area and low area along Chowen Avenue. This information was used in conjunction with the MNDNR’s 2011 LiDAR elevation dataset to update the stage-storage relationships in the model for subwatersheds within the Project Area 3 study area. The storm sewer information in the model was also updated based on a survey conducted by the City. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 16 4.3 Existing Conditions Flood Risk Table 4-1 summarizes the predicted water surface elevations under existing conditions for the subwatersheds within Project Area 3 for the 1-, 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year frequency, 24-hour duration events. The 100-year frequency, 24-hour flood elevation for Project Area 3 (LP_24 and LP_27) is 883.9. The inundation area corresponding to the 883.9 flood elevation is shown in Figure 4-1. Flood frequency data is often also described in terms of a percentage of risk. For example, the 100-year frequency flood inundation area represents an area that has a 1% chance of flooding (1-percent-annual chance flood) for any given year. Structures located within the 1-percent-annual chance flood inundation area have a 26 percent chance of flooding during the life of a standard 30-year mortgage. The City provided survey of the low entry elevations for properties adjacent to the LP_24 and LP_27 low areas. Comparison of these elevations with the 100-year flood elevation indicates that seven dwellings will be impacted by the 100-year flood elevation in the backyard depression area (LP_24) and sixteen dwellings will be impacted at West 60th and Chowen Avenue (LP_27). As shown in Table 4-1, six dwellings in the backyard depression area and seven structures along Chowen Avenue will be impacted by the 10-year frequency event. Modeling results indicate that three dwellings within Subwatershed LP 24 and one dwelling within Subwatershed LP_27 (5932 Chowen Avenue) are impacted as often as the 1-year frequency event (in other words, a 100-percent-annual chance). Although modeling results indicate potential impacts in the LP_24 subwatershed as often as the 1-year event, the French drain-type system(s) in place may be functioning sufficiently to reduce the frequency of flooding. Table 4-1 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under existing conditions at the Chowen Avenue backyard depression area (LP_24) and West 60th street and Chowen Avenue intersection (LP_27) and the number of dwellings/ garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation 24-hour Storm Recurrence Interval Water Surface Elevation at Chowen Ave LP_24 Water Surface Elevation at LP_27 1-year 882.7 (3/2) 880.8 (1/0) 2-year 882.9 (3/2) 881.4 (2/1) 10-year 883.3 (6/2) 882.7 (7/2) 25-year 883.5 (6/2) 883.3 (9/2) 50-year 883.6 (7/2) 883.6 (12/3) 100-year 883.9 (7/2) 883.9 (16/3) Flood risk analysis maps, often generically referred to as “flood risk maps,” were also generated for the Project Area 3 study area. Figure 4-2 (“Annual Flood Risk”), depicts the approximate chance of flooding (as a percentage) for any given year. Figure 4-3 depicts the approximate chance of flooding (also as a P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 17 percentage) over the life of a typical 30-year home mortgage. The purpose of these flood risk maps is to help property owners and the community better understand their potential flood hazard and risk in the inundation areas shown on these maps. These types of flood risk assessments can help guide community mitigation efforts by highlighting areas where risk reduction actions may produce the highest return on investment. 4.3.1 Residential Redevelopment Residential redevelopment within Project Area 3 is resulting in properties with an increased percentage of impervious area or directly-connected impervious area, which can increase the stormwater runoff rate and volume. A review of recent residential directly-connected imperviousness increases was conducted using GIS to approximate a “typical” impervious percentage for redeveloped residential properties. A modeling analysis was then conducted for this project area to help identify the potential impacts from the increased imperviousness in this and other Edina neighborhoods. The impervious areas of several recent residential redevelopment lots throughout Edina were delineated using GIS. The approximated directly-connected imperviousness (DCI) of these lots ranged from 30% to 45%. For the modeling analysis, a directly-connected imperviousness of 40% was used for low-density residential areas, which is a significant increase from the 20% directly-connected imperviousness assumption used in the original XP-SWMM models developed for the City. Three redevelopment “scenarios” were modeled for Project Area 3: (1) 1/3 of residential properties redeveloped, (2) 2/3 of residential properties redeveloped, and (3) all residential properties redeveloped. The modeling results, summarized in Table 4-2, indicate that the increase in imperviousness has minimal impact on flood volume in subwatershed LP_27 for the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event. The corresponding increase in peak flood elevation is also minimal (approximately 0.1 feet under the 100% redevelopment scenario). Table 4-2 Comparison of flood volumes in Subwatershed LP_27 for the 100-year, 24-hour rainfall event under varying residential redevelopment scenarios Scenario Subwatershed LP_27 Total Flood Volume1 (acre-feet) % Increase in Total Flood Volume1 No Redevelopment 8.50 - Scenario 1: 1/3 redevelopment2 8.68 2% Scenario 2: 2/3 redevelopment2 8.85 4% Scenario 3: all lots redeveloped2 9.02 6% 1 Total flood volume represents the volume of runoff stored in Subwatershed LP_27 at the time corresponding with the peak water surface elevation. 2 Increases in flood depth range from 0.03 to 0.1 feet for the 1/3 redevelopment to the 100% redevelopment scenarios. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 18 Upon review of the modeling results for the redevelopment scenarios, the following question may arise “Why does the increased imperviousness not have a greater impact on 100-year flood elevations in the LP_27 subwatershed?” The answer is that the existing storm sewer system has insufficient capacity to drain the LP_27 and adjacent subwatersheds, resulting in significant ponding at West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue. A moderate increase in runoff volume is therefore distributed over a large area. The intensity of the 100-year event is another reason that the impacts of increased imperviousness are not greater. During the peak intensity of large storm events, the rainfall intensity (inches/hour) often greatly exceeds the infiltration capacity of the underlying soils. During these times, the amount of rainfall infiltrated in a given time period can be small compared to the amount of runoff generated. Table 4-3 summarizes the impacts of increased imperviousness on runoff depths generated from rainfall events ranging from 1-year to 100-year frequencies. The runoff depths are from a representative residential subwatershed within Project Area 3 (LP_20), comprised entirely of B soils (predominant soil type in Edina). As shown in Table 4-3, the percent increase in runoff resulting from increased imperviousness is greater for more frequent, less intense rainfall events. The increase in runoff depth decreases as the rainfall event becomes more intense. Table 4-3 Comparison of runoff depths from a residential Subwatershed (LP_20) with B soils under varying directly-connected imperviousness (DCI) scenarios and precipitation frequencies Recurrence Interval 24-hour Rainfall Depth (inches) Subwatershed LP_20 Runoff Depth1 with 20% DCI (inches/acre) Existing Conditions Runoff Depth1 with 27% DCI (inches/acre) 1/3 Redeveloped Runoff Depth1 with 33% DCI (inches/acre) 2/3 Redeveloped Runoff Depth1 with 40% DCI (inches/acre) 100% Redeveloped Increase in Runoff Depth between Existing Conditions and 100% Redeveloped (%) 1-year 2.5 0.84 0.96 1.09 1.22 46% 2-year 2.9 1.13 1.26 1.40 1.53 36% 10-year 4.3 2.30 2.46 2.61 2.76 20% 25-year 5.4 3.28 3.45 3.61 3.78 15% 50-year 6.4 4.17 4.35 4.52 4.69 13% 100-year 7.5 5.17 5.36 5.54 5.72 11% 1 Runoff depths reflect site runoff only (i.e., subwatershed runoff that has not been conveyed downstream). P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 19 4.4 Improvement Options The following flood improvement options were evaluated to reduce flood risk in the low areas within Project Area 3: Option A: Infiltration Swales Incorporate stormwater infiltration swales within City right-of-way. Install a new pipe to drain LP_24 backyard depression area. Option B: Infiltration Swales with Storage Pipes Incorporate stormwater infiltration swales and 36-inch perforated underground storage/infiltration pipes (CPEP) within City right-of-way. Install a new pipe to drain LP_24 backyard depression area. Option C: New Pipe on West 60th Street Install a new pipe to drain LP_24 backyard depression area; install a new pipe to drain LP_27 low area, connecting to the existing system near the intersection of France Avenue and Halifax; upsize the existing storm sewer from France Avenue and Halifax to Pamela Park stormwater pond (LP_26) Option D: Upsize Existing Storm Sewer Install new pipe to drain LP_24 backyard depression area; Upsize the existing storm sewer from West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue to Lake Pamela (LP_26) Options A and B: Right-of-Way Stormwater Storage/Infiltration The lack of sufficient capacity in the existing system results in flows “backing up” and pooling in the low area at the intersection of West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue during large storm events. One method to reduce the runoff that reaches this intersection is to provide additional flood storage and infiltration throughout the drainage area. Options A and B reflect two Living Streets stormwater storage and infiltration concepts that were developed for Project Area 3. Option A includes infiltration swales installed within the City right-of-way. The shallow (6- to 1-inches deep) swales or depressed gardens, shown conceptually in Figure 4-4 as turfed swales, would collect and infiltrate runoff from the roadway and adjacent driveways. For modeling and cost estimating purposes, it was assumed that infiltration swales would be installed in approximately 70% of the parcels within the street reconstruction area (see Figure 4-5). A collector pipe would also be installed between the infiltration swales and street to convey overflows and draintile flows, where appropriate, to the existing storm sewer system. Option B includes the right-of-way infiltration swales of Option A, in addition to installation of 36-inch perforated pipes (CPEP) between the infiltration swales and street to provide additional flood storage and infiltration. Both Options A and B include installation of a new 24-inch CPEP from the LP_24 backyard depression to the existing system at the West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue intersection. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 20 Figure 4-4 Conceptual drawing of Option A, right-of-way infiltration swales for Project Area 3 street reconstruction areas Options C and D: Additional Storm Sewer Capacity Improvement Options C and D both provide additional storm sewer capacity to reduce the flood risk in Subwatersheds LP_27 and LP_24, but differ in the proposed storm sewer configuration. Option C (Figure 4-6) includes installation of a new 48-inch pipe westward along West 60th Street from the existing system at West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue intersection (Subwatershed LP_27) to France Avenue, then southward to the existing system near the intersection of France Avenue and Halifax Avenue. Option C also includes upgrading the existing storm sewer pipes to 60-inch CPEP (or equivalent capacity) from France and Halifax to Lake Pamela (Subwatershed LP_26). One advantage of this storm sewer configuration is that it does not require replacement of pipes between properties on France Avenue and Ewing Avenue. However, review of elevation data indicates that a deep cut would be necessary for installation along West 60th Street and France Avenue. Option D (Figure 4-7) includes upsizing of the existing storm sewer system from West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue to Lake Pamela (Subwatershed LP_26). Table 4-4 describes the proposed pipe size increases. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 21 Table 4-4 Proposed pipe size increases for Option D in Project Area 3 (West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue) Pipe Segment Existing Size (Diameter) Proposed Size (Diameter) Pipe on Chowen Avenue from West 60th to West 61st Street 24-inch 54-inch Pipe on West 61st Street from Chowen to Ewing Avenues 24-inch 54-inch Pipe from intersection of Ewing Avenue and West 61st Street west to France Avenue 24-inch 60-inch Pipe on France Avenue from approximately 150 feet north of the intersection of France Avenue and Halifax Avenue to the Lake Pamela outfall 42-inch 60-inch 4.4.1 Flood Benefits Table 4-5 summarizes the reductions in water surface elevations in the LP_24 backyard depression area for Options A, B, C, and D for the 1-, 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year frequency, 24-hour rainfall events. Note that all options shown in Table 4-5 include installation of a new pipe to drain the backyard area. Modeling results indicate that connection of the backyard depression area without increasing the downstream pipe capacity will not provide 100-year level of protection to the adjacent properties. Table 4-5 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions in LP_24 and the number of dwellings / detached garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation 24-hour Storm Recurrence Interval Existing Conditions1 Option A1: Infiltration Swales Option B1: Infiltration Swales with Storage Pipes Option C1: New Pipe on West 60th Street Option D1: Upsize Existing Storm Sewer 1-year 882.7 (3/2) 881.3 (0/0) 877.3 (0/0) 877.3 (0/0) 877.3 (0/0) 2-year 882.9 (3/2) 881.3 (0/0) 881.2 (0/0) 877.5 (0/0) 877.5 (0/0) 10-year 883.3 (6/2) 882.7 (3/2) 882.4 (3/2) 878.1 (0/0) 878.1 (0/0) 25-year 883.5 (6/2) 883.3 (6/2) 883.1 (5/2) 878.7 (0/0) 878.7 (0/0) 50-year 883.6 (7/2) 883.5 (7/2) 883.4 (6/2) 881.1 (0/0) 881.5 (0/0) 100-year 883.9 (7/2) 883.9 (7/2) 883.8 (7/2) 881.8 (0/0) 882.0 (0/1) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 22 Table 4-6 summarizes the reductions in water surface elevations in the low area at West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue (LP_27) for Options A, B, C, and D for the 1-, 2-, 10-, 25-, 50-, and 100-year frequency, 24-hour rainfall events. Options A and B offer some flood risk reduction in the more frequent storms (1-year and 2-year events), but do not result in significant improvements in the less frequency storms. Options C and D provide a 50-year level of protection for all adjacent structures and a 100-year level protection for all structures with exception of one dwelling at 5932 Chowen Avenue. Table 4-6 Maximum water surface elevations (feet, MSL) under proposed conditions in LP_27 and the number of dwellings / detached garages (shown in parentheses) that are inundated at that corresponding elevation 24-hour Storm Recurrence Interval Existing Conditions1 Option A1: Infiltration Swales Option B1: Infiltration Swales with Storage Pipes Option C1: New Pipe on West 60th Street Option D1: Upsize Existing Storm Sewer 1-year 880.8 (1/0) 880.3 (1/0) 877.1 (0/0) 873.6 (0/0) 871.0 (0/0) 2-year 881.4 (2/1) 881.3 (2/1) 879.5 (0/0) 874.0 (0/0) 871.3 (0/0) 10-year 882.7 (7/2) 882.7 (7/2) 882.4 (5/2) 875.0 (0/0) 872.8 (0/0) 25-year 883.3 (9/2) 883.2 (9/2) 883.1 (9/2) 876.4 (0/0) 876.1 (0/0) 50-year 883.6 (12/3) 883.5 (12/2) 883.4 (11/2) 879.4 (0/0) 880.0 (0/0) 100-year 883.9 (16/3) 883.9 (13/3) 883.8 (13/3) 880.7 (1/0) 880.9 (1/0) 1 Elevations based on Atlas 14 precipitation depths Table 4-7 summarizes the 100-year peak discharge rates through the proposed storm sewer pipes for Options A, B, C, and D. The storm sewer manhole located on France Avenue approximately 120 feet south of Halifax Avenue, where flows from the France Avenue system are conveyed westward to Lake Pamela, surcharges under existing and proposed conditions. Based on the topographic information, the surcharged runoff pools on France Avenue and then flows overland to Lake Pamela between 6117 Halifax Avenue and 6108 France Avenue. Options C and D result in increased overland flows between France Avenue and Lake Pamela for the 10-year rainfall event and greater. The City should consider surveying the overland flow conveyance channel between these two properties to verify flow capacity, assess potential impacts to the dwellings, and determine if any grading modifications should be considered to reduce flood risk. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 23 Table 4-7 100-year peak flow rates through the proposed pipes for Project Area 3 improvement Options A, B, C, and D 24-hour Storm Recurrence Interval Existing Conditions1 Option A1: Infiltration Swales Option B1: Infiltration Swales with Storage Pipes Option C2: New Pipe on West 60th Street Option D1: Upsize Existing Storm Sewer 100-year 27 27 27 120 158 1 Flow rates reflect flow through pipe on Chowen Avenue between West 60th Street and West 61st Street. 2 Flow rates reflect flow through proposed pipe on West 60th Street between France Avenue and Chowen Avenue and do not include flow to the existing pipe on Chowen Avenue between West 60th and 61st Streets. 4.4.2 Water Quality Benefits Although flood risk reduction is the primary objective of this analysis, water quality benefits of the identified Options A, B, C, and D should also be considered. Currently, runoff from Project Area 3 is discharged downstream to Lake Pamela without any water quality treatment or pretreatment. While incorporating living streets concepts into the upcoming street reconstruction project (Options A and B) has less impactful flood risk reduction benefits than providing additional storm sewer capacity (Options C and D), the water quality benefits of Options A and B are substantially greater. With implementation of Option A (infiltration swales in the right-of-way), the average annual runoff volume, total phosphorus, and total suspended solids generated from the portion of the study area tributary to the infiltrations swales will be reduced by approximately 70%. This equates to an approximate 30% reduction in total phosphorus and total suspended solids from the entire Project Area 3 drainage area tributary to Lake Pamela. With Option B, the average annual reduction in total phosphorus and total suspended solids loading from Project Area 3 to Lake Pamela is reduced by 40%, based on the MPCA MIDS calculator. Options A or B would also help mitigate water quality impacts to downstream Lake Pamela and Minnehaha Creek from impervious increases resulting from residential redevelopment. For Options C and D, installation of underground treatment structures within the tributary drainage area would be recommended as part of pipe upgrades, to provide pretreatment of the water prior to discharge to Lake Pamela. The opinions of probable cost for Options C and D include installation of a 96-inch diameter sump manhole with a SAFL baffle. 4.5 Engineer’s Opinion of Probable Costs Planning level engineer’s opinions of probable costs were prepared for Options A, B, C, and D. The opinions of probable cost, summarized in Table 4-8, are based on our experience with similar construction projects and the level of information available to determine costs for the proposed projects. Given that the costs are based on planning-level designs, a contingency of 30% was applied to the estimated construction costs. See Appendix C for detailed summaries of the costs for Options A, B, C, and D. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 24 Many of the flood improvement options identified in this study have high costs. To help evaluate the costs, we have also included an estimated cost for the City to obtain the properties that do not receive a 100-year level of protection under existing conditions. The costs to obtain the properties are summarized in Table 4-8 and are based on the estimated market values of impacted dwellings as established by the Hennepin County assessor as of January 2, 2012. The City may also wish to consider retrofitting flood- prone residential structures as an alternative option. Retrofitting options and costs vary considerably by individual situation. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has developed retrofitting guidance documents including Engineering Principles and Practices for Retrofitting Flood-Prone Residential Structures (FEMA P-259 / January 2012) and Homeowner’s Guide to Retrofitting – Six Ways to Protect Your Home From Flooding (FEMA P-312 / December 2009) that can provide additional reference information as the City considers flood improvement options. Table 4-8 Estimated costs for West 60th Street and Chowen Avenue (Project Area 3) improvement Options A, B, C, D and buy-out option Improvement Option Estimated Cost2 Option A: New storm sewer connection to backyard area; Infiltration swales in right-of-way $1,160,000 Option B: New storm sewer connection to backyard area; Infiltration swales with storage pipe in right-of-way $1,660,000 Option C: New storm sewer connection to backyard area; New pipe on West 60th Street $830,000 Option D: New storm sewer connection to backyard area; Upsize existing storm sewer $1,230,000 Buy-out Option1 $6,210,000 1 Buy-out costs based on combined estimated market value for impacted dwellings under existing conditions for the 100-year frequency event, as reported on Hennepin County property information search website. 2 Costs rounded up to the nearest $10,000. P:\Mpls\23 MN\27\2327354\WorkFiles\2013\STS_406\Final Reports\Project Areas 1-3-7\STS_406_FinalReport_PAs_1_3_7.docx 25 ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_Project Area 1 -Ashcroft Lane Project Area 7 - France Ave and Scott Terrace Project Area 3 - 60th and Chowen Ave Project Area 1 - Barrie Road and York Ave §¨¦494 £¤169 £¤169 62 100 7 100 7 62 Figure 1-1 PROJECT STUDY AREAS Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-01-17 07:37 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA1_3_7\Figure 1-1 Project Study Areas.mxd User: jrv 0 2,500 5,000 Feet !;N Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 ^_Project Areas City of Edina Boundary 62 456717 456717 Drew Ave Abbott Ave Grimes Ave Beard Ave Ewing Ave Heritage Dr Beard Pl Zenith Ave Chowen Cv W 61st St Grimes L a W 62nd St Halifax Ave Chowen Ave W 60th St Zenith Ave W 59th St Drew Ave Chowen Ave Halifax Ave Beard Ave Abbott Ave W 60th St Ewing Ave Zenith Ave Ewing Ave W 62nd St W 62nd St France Ave France Ave Chowen Ave W 58th St W 58th St W 58th St W 58th St W 60th St France Ave 456717 LP_27 LP_20 MHS_50 LP_19 LP_11 LP_8 LP_13 MHS_52 NC_95 LP_9 LP_17 NC_93 NC_97 LP_23 LP_7 NC_96 LP_16 LP_26 LP_18 LP_15 NC_92 LP_24 LP_10 NC_145 NC_94 NC_88 NC_86 NC_133 NC_85 NC_126 NC_84 LP_28 NC_134 LP_14 !;N 0 250 500 Feet Figure 4-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 100 YEAR INUNDATION Project Area 3 - 60th St and Chowen Ave Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-01-22 14:24 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA1_3_7\Figure 4-1 Existing Conditions - 60th St and Chowen Ave.mxd User: jrv !>Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Existing Storm Sewer 100 Year 24-Hour Event Inundation Area* Subwatersheds Parcels Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). 62 62Beard PlChowen AveW 60th St W 61st St W 59th St W 62nd StDrew AveChowen CvEwing AveFrance AveBeard AveZenith AveAbbott AveNC_92 NC_96 NC_133 NC_95 NC_134 NC_97 NC_93 NC_126 LP_8 LP_18 LP_19 LP_20 LP_11 LP_7 LP_23 LP_13 LP_15 LP_27 LP_24 MHS_52 MHS_50 0 200 400 Feet Figure 4-2 ANNUAL FLOOD RISK Project Area 3 - 60th St and Chowen Ave City of Edina Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-01-22 14:26 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA1_3_7\Figure 4-2 Annual Flood Risk - 60th St and Chowen Ave.mxd User: jrv !>Existing Manhole /Catch Basin Existing Storm Sewer Subwatersheds Parcels Annual Flood Risk* >80% 50% - 80% 20% - 50% 10% - 20% 4% - 10% 2% - 4% 1% - 2% !;N Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet The flood risk inundation areas shown on this figure are based on predictive modeling data using a hypothetical rainfall distribution developed from Atlas14 precipitation frequency estimates for Edina (Coordinates: 44.8716N, 93.3762W). Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). 62Beard PlChowen AveW 60th St W 61st St W 59th St W 62nd StDrew AveChowen CvEwing AveBeard AveZenith AveAbbott Ave456717 NC_92 NC_96 NC_133 NC_95 NC_134 NC_97 NC_93 NC_126 LP_8 LP_18 LP_19 LP_20 LP_11 LP_7 LP_23 LP_13 LP_27 LP_24 MHS_52 MHS_50 0 200 400 Feet Figure 4-3 CHANCE OF FLOODING OVER A TYPICAL 30 YEAR HOME MORTGAGE Project Area 3 - 60th Street and Chowen Ave City of Edina Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-01-22 14:30 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA1_3_7\Figure 4-3 Chance of Flooding over a Typical 30 Year Home Mortgage - 60th St and Chowen Ave.mxd User: jrv !>Existing Manhole /Catch Basin Existing Storm Sewer Subwatersheds Parcels 30 Year Flood Risk* >99% 95% - 99% 90% - 95% 75% - 90% 50% - 75% 26% - 50% !;N Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet The flood risk inundation areas shown on this figure are based on predictive modeling data using a hypothetical rainfall distribution developed from Atlas14 precipitation frequency estimates for Edina (Coordinates: 44.8716N, 93.3762W). Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). 62 456717 456717 Drew Ave York Ave Abbott Ave Grimes Ave Beard Ave Chowen Cv W 61st St Grimes La Beard Pl H a l i f a x A v e W 59th St Chowen Ave York Ave S Halifax Ave W 62nd St Chowen Ave Beard Pl W 58th St Beard Ave W 60th St Ewing Ave Ewing Ave Abbott Ave Zenith Ave Zenith Ave France Ave York Ave Halifax Ave Drew Ave Halifax Ave W 60th St Ewing Ave Heritage Dr France Ave France Ave W 62nd St Chowen Ave France Ave Ba r r i e R d 62 LP_27 MHS_50 LP_20 LP_19 LP_17 LP_11 LP_8 NC_88 NC_97 MHS_52 NC_96 LP_13 NC_95 LP_9 NC_93 LP_26 LP_7 LP_16 LP_23 NC_86 LP_10 NC_84 LP_18 NC_94 LP_15 NC_85NC_82 NC_92 LP_24 MHS_62 NC_145 NC_133 NC_132 NC_98 MHS_32 LP_14 Minnehaha Creek NC_126 NC_134 LP_28 NC_104 LP_2 NC_147 MHS_32 MHS_74MHS_1 !;N 0 300 600 Feet Figure 4-5 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OPTIONS A AND B Project Area 3 - 60th St and Chowen Ave City of Edina Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-01-22 14:36 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA1_3_7\Figure 4-5 Proposed Improvement Options A and B - 60th St and Chowen Ave.mxd User: jrv !>Proposed Manhole/Catch Basin !>Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Proposed New Pipe Existing Storm Sewer Streets with Infiltration Swales Options A and B: 100 year 24-hour Event Inundation Area* Subwatersheds Parcels Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). 456717 456717 Drew Ave Grimes Ave Beard Ave Grimes La W 60th St W 62nd St Chowen Ave Ew ing Ave Halifax Ave France Ave W 61st St Chowen Ave W 62nd St Chowen Ave Ewing Ave Ewing Ave Halifax Ave Drew Ave Chowen Ave Beard Ave Beard Ave W 62nd St W 60th St Beard Pl France Ave W 62nd St Halifax Ave W 59th St Chowen Cv 62 LP_27 LP_19 LP_11 LP_8 LP_13 LP_9 LP_20 MHS_52 LP_23 MHS_50 NC_93 NC_95 LP_26 LP_18 LP_7 LP_17 LP_10 LP_24 LP_15 NC_92NC_145 LP_28 NC_126 LP_14 !;N 0 200 400 Feet Figure 4-6 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OPTION C Project Area 3 - 60th St and Chowen Ave City of Edina Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-01-22 14:40 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA1_3_7\Figure 4-6 Proposed Improvement Option C - 60th St and Chowen Ave.mxd User: jrv !>Proposed Manhole/Catch Basin !>Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Proposed New Pipe Proposed Pipe Upgrade Existing Storm Sewer Option C: 100 Year 24-Hour Event Inundation Area* Subwatersheds Parcels Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). 62 456717 456717 Drew Ave Grimes Ave Beard Ave Beard Pl Chowen Cv W 61st St Grimes La W 60th St W 59th St Chowen Ave Ew ing Ave Halifax Ave France Ave Chowen Ave Chowen Ave Ewing Ave Ewing Ave Halifax Ave Halifax Ave Beard Ave Drew Ave W 62nd St W 60th St W 62nd St France Ave France Ave LP_27 LP_19 LP_11 LP_8 LP_13 LP_9 LP_20 MHS_52 LP_23 MHS_50 NC_93 NC_95 LP_26 LP_18 LP_7 LP_17 LP_10 LP_24 LP_15 NC_92NC_145 LP_28 NC_126 LP_14 !;N 0 200 400 Feet Figure 4-7 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OPTION D Project Area 3 - 60th St and Chowen Ave City of Edina Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.2.1, 2014-01-22 14:42 File: I:\Client\Edina\Projects\STS406\Maps\Reports\Final_Memo_PA1_3_7\Figure 4-7 Proposed Improvement Option D - 60th St and Chowen Ave.mxd User: jrv !>Proposed Manhole/Catch Basin !>Existing Manhole/Catch Basin Proposed New Pipe Proposed Pipe Upgrade Existing Storm Sewer Option D: 100 Year 24-Hour Event Inundation Area* Subwatersheds Parcels Imagery: Microsoft; 2012 *Vertical Datum: NGVD 29, Feet Vertical accuracy of the MNDNR 2011 LiDAR data used for mapping the inundation area is +/- 5 cm (0.16 ft) for the project areas within the City of Edina (Source: http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/metadata/lidar_metro2011.html). APPENDIX H Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: September 20, 2018 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room August 16, 2018 A. 2019 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Projects Planner Nolan provided and update on the upcoming street reconstruction projects and asked for preliminary input on issues related to Living Streets, safety, multi-modal transportation, etc. • Comments from the ETC are as follows: o Chowen A/B needs more sidewalks than what is on the plan. o Chowen A/B needs more street lighting. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 1 4 75% Iyer, Surya 1 1 2 25% LaForce, Tom 1 1 2 25% Kane, Bocar 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 100% Miranda, Lou 1 1 2 25% Olson, Larry 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Richman, Lori 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Ruthruff, Erik 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Scherer, Matthew 1 1 1 1 1 5 88% Veluvali, Shankar 1 1 1 1 1 5 88% Jenny Ma (s) 1 1 1 1 1 5 63% Tessa Yeager (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 75% Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room October 25, 2018 I. Reports/Recommendations A. 2019 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Draft Engineering Studies Assistant City Engineer, Aaron Ditzler, addressed the ETC’s questions and discussed the 2019 neighborhood reconstruction projects. The following comments were made: • Chowen Park: o Concrete alleys are not proposed for replacement but they may be repaired at no cost to residents because they would be considered maintenance and paid from a different fund. o The number of tear down/rebuilds was requested. o Beard will be the only sidewalk. o Boulevards are city right of way but residents are responsible for maintenance. o The ETC would like to see the Living Streets scoring tool used for the 2019 projects. o Beard sidewalk is being paid for using PACS funds. Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner Johnson to write an advisory communication to the City Council in support of the Beard Avenue Sidewalk Construction in the Chowen Park A and B project area. All voted Aye. Motion Carried. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Iyer, Surya 1 1 2 100% LaForce, Tom 1 1 2 100% Kane, Bocar 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Miranda, Lou 1 1 2 100% Olson, Larry 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Richman, Lori 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Ruthruff, Erik 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Scherer, Matthew 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 90% Veluvali, Shankar 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Emmanual Ayelomi (s) 1 1 2 100% Yeukai Zimbwa (s) 1 1 2 100% Jenny Ma (s) 1 1 1 1 1 5 50% Tessa Yeager (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 60% APPENDIX I DKMBJ Engineering Traffic Study Report TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE CITY OF EDINA DKMBJ ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 500 PILLSBURY DR SE, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55455 MAY 7, 2015 DKMBJ Engineering 500 Pillsbury Dr. SE Minneapolis, MN 55455 May 7th, 2015 Chad Millner Mark Nolan City of Edina Public Works 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 RE: Neighborhood Traffic Study for the City of Edina Dear Mr. Nolan and Mr. Millner: We trust the following report will provide you with baseline information regarding the traffic conditions in Strachauer Park, Chowen Park and Creek Knoll neighborhoods. We believe that these findings will aid you in your presentation of construction plans to the Edina Transportation Commission. The enclosed report contains our findings from a neighborhood traffic study conducted in Strachauer Park, Chowen Park and Creek Knoll neighborhoods of Edina. DKMBJ Engineering performed a parking and traffic analysis of the area and developed a bike route that could eventually be connected to the Edina Promenade. We identified areas where the neighborhood could be improved to become more livable and sustainable as a part of the City of Edina’s Living Streets Policy. We would like to thank you for working with us as we conducted this study. Regards, Derek Walden walde118@umn.edu Michael Narow narow006@umn.edu Ben Curti curti278@umn.edu Joe Totten totte011@umn.edu Kyle Donahue dona0282@umn.edu Executive Summary The purpose of this study was to investigate the vehicle and pedestrian traffic as well as the current parking situation in the Strachauer Park, Chowen Park and Creek Knoll neighborhoods in the City of Edina. These neighborhoods were constructed in the 1950’s and 1960’s and plans for reconstruction of the infrastructure have already begun. DKMBJ Engineering investigated vehicular speeds and the presence of cut-through traffic on 58th Street and 60th Street to determine how frequently vehicles are traveling through these neighborhoods. Secondly, parking utilization was investigated to determine if there were any parking related issues and whether changes needed to be made. Finally, DKMBJ Engineering developed a proposed route to connect the Edina Promenade with Strachauer Park and York Park. As a result of our study, DKMBJ Engineering recommends the following: • No treatment is needed in regards to cut through traffic on 58th Street and 60th Street. • Traffic calming circles should be placed at the intersections of 58th Street and Beard Avenue and 60th Street and Beard Avenue to better control vehicular speeds. • One area should remain unchanged with regard to two-sided street parking: specifically, the south end of Zone 8 (See figures A-3 through A-5). All remaining areas of study would require no special parking accommodations and the City of Edina may proceed with their construction plans. • The bike route should be implemented as shared car and bike lanes. • Connecting the Edina Promenade bike path with a separate bridge spanning TH 62 from Colony Way on the south to Strachauer Park on the north. The route would travel through Strachauer Park, north along Beard Avenue, east on 57th Street, north on Zenith Street until reaching York Park. The path will curve eastbound through York Park connecting to 55th Street. i Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................ Error! Bookmark not defined. List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Traffic Study Background......................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Vehicle Traffic Analysis ........................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Vehicle Parking Analysis .......................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Pedestrian and Bike Traffic Analysis ....................................................................................... 9 5.0 Sustainability........................................................................................................................... 10 6.0 Recommendations ................................................................................................................... 11 7.0 Schedule and Budget............................................................................................................... 12 8.0 References ............................................................................................................................... 13 9.0 Appendix ............................................................................................................................... A-1 List of Figures Figure 1-1: Location of Study ......................................................................................................... 1 Figure 2-1.1: 58th Street Traffic Counts .......................................................................................... 2 Figure 2-2: Example of Traffic Circle ............................................................................................ 5 Figure 4-1: Example Section of Proposed Bike Lane Road ........................................................... 9 Figure 7-1: Total Planned Cost v. Actual Cost ............................................................................. 12 Figure A-1: Existing Conditions ................................................................................................. A-1 Figure A-2: Weekday Parking Utilization .................................................................................. A-2 Figure A-3: Saturday Parking Utilization ................................................................................... A-3 Figure A-4: Sunday Parking Utilization ..................................................................................... A-4 Figure A-5: Proposed Bike Path Location .................................................................................. A-5 List of Tables Table 3-1: Parking Utilization .................................................................................................... A-8 Table A-6: Traffic Count Data from City of Edina .................................................................... A-6 Table A-11: Traffic Data Collected by DKMBJ ....................................................................... A-11 Table A-12: Resident Requests in the Area Provided by the City of Edina ............................. A-12 ii 1.0 Traffic Study Background The City of Edina encompasses 45 neighborhoods, three of which are Strachauer Park, Chowen Park, and Creek Knoll. These neighborhoods are defined by France Avenue to the west, Xerxes Avenue to the east, Minnesota Trunk-Highway (TH) 62 to the south, and 54th Street to the north (see Figure 1-1)(Google Maps 2015). The clients (city staff) note that the City of Edina has recently received a high amount of traffic safety requests from residents in these three neighborhoods when compared to the rest of the City, this can be seen with the area comprising 3.5% of the city’s area, but comprising nearly 8% of all traffic safety requests in the past three years. See Table A-12 in the appendix. Residents are concerned with an increased traffic volume, higher vehicle speeds, and pedestrian safety. The majority of these traffic requests are requests for control at currently uncontrolled intersections. The City of Edina has plans to reconstruct many of the neighborhood’s roads in the near future and wants to investigate whether their current plans suffice or if changes need to be made based on resident requests. These city plans are based on necessity. The City tries to reconstruct roadways with the highest needs based on specific metrics. Living Streets, which is discussed later in this report, is then applied to these projects. This policy attempts to make the City of Edina a more livable and sustainable community. It includes aspects such as narrowing roadways, traffic calming techniques, and installing sidewalks and bike paths. The City engineering staff has requested help from DKMBJ Engineering to investigate these requests, assess the traffic conditions in these neighborhoods, and make subsequent recommendations based on the team’s findings. Figure 1-1: Location of Study DKMBJ Engineering 1 2.0 Vehicle Traffic Analysis The three neighborhoods being investigated are bounded by County State Aid Highways (CSAH), Xerxes Avenue to the east and France Avenue to the west. Minnesota Trunk Highway 62 determines the southern border and 54th Street determines the northern border. The City of Edina does not maintain ownership of these roads, and therefore, the aforementioned roads are out of the scope of this analysis. 2.1 Municipal State Aid Streets in the Neighborhoods 58th Street and 60th Street handle the majority of traffic into and out of these neighborhoods, as they run perpendicular and connect to both France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. Both of these streets are designated as collector streets meaning that they are designed for through traffic and higher levels of use. Concerns have arisen from the neighborhood residents about these streets being used at high speeds and for cut through traffic between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. Differences in traffic control on 58th Street at France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue allow us to predict that 58th Street will see higher traffic at France Avenue, where it has a full signal. Traffic volumes should decrease along 58th Street as it nears Xerxes Avenue, where there is a two way stop. The reversal of this pattern should be noticed on 60th Street, as that street has an all way stop condition on Xerxes Avenue, and a one-way stop control at the intersection with France Avenue. DKMBJ Engineering predicted the highest traffic volumes would be at Xerxes Avenue and will decrease as 60th Street approaches France Avenue. 2.1.1 58th Street These predictions were found to be mostly accurate. Analysis of existing traffic counts reveals that 58th Street, while a busy street, is used predominantly to access the neighborhood. Counts are located in Table A-6 in the appendix. Traffic counts from 2010 showed that most traffic using 58th Street accessed the neighborhood from France Avenue, carrying an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 3,245 Vehicles. Traffic volumes diminished as the counts headed east, with 58th Street carrying only 565 vehicles per day at its intersection with Xerxes Avenue (see Figure 2-1.1). Figure 2-1.1: 58th Street Traffic Counts DKMBJ Engineering 2 The importance of 58th Street as an access point for the whole neighborhood cannot be overstated. Traffic counts on local crossroads of 58th Street indicate that approximately 600 vehicles on each street use 58th Street to access larger volume roads. Six cross streets intersect 58th Street between Xerxes Avenue and France Avenue, and if all these streets carry 600 vehicles to or from 58th Street, then 3,600 vehicles would be using 58th Street to access local residences. The sum of vehicles accessing 58th Street from both France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue is 3,810. The small difference of vehicles entering and exiting the neighborhood and local roadway volumes supports the conclusion that 58th Street is not being overly used as a through street. The measured 85th-percentile speeds on 58th Street are commonly above 30 mph, while the speed limit on this street is 25 mph. This means that speeding in this area is a concern. It should be noted that on crossroads of 58th Street there was an inconsistency in the data. The counts west of Abbot Avenue of 991, York Avenue of 1,333 and Xerxes Avenue of 565 vehicles showed a sharp drop in vehicle traffic from York Avenue to Xerxes Avenue exceeding the usual traffic volumes seen in the neighborhood. This indicates that one of these counts may have a high error, and be unreliable. The exclusion of counts at either York Avenue or Xerxes Avenue would not significantly alter the conclusions of this report, as cut through traffic would still be the minority of traffic, and most vehicles using 58th Street would be accessing the neighborhood from France Avenue. 2.1.2 60th Street 60th Street also connects Xerxes Avenue to France Avenue. Daily traffic counts for 60th Street were taken in April, 2015. These counts can be found in Table A-11 in the appendix. The analysis of this street was performed in a similar manner, but because the data was collected for the purpose of the report, a more detailed analysis was conducted. 60th Street is not considered a major artery for through traffic, but is more so used for distributing vehicles from the local residences to the regional roadway network. During the study, 60th Street had a maximum traffic count of 2,373 Vehicles in a day. The count was highest between York Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, which supports the earlier prediction that 60th Street is used primarily for access at Xerxes Avenue, where the intersection is controlled by an all-way stop. Using a similar method as mentioned before it was determined that up to 60 percent of vehicles use 60th Street to move between Xerxes Avenue and France Avenue, however because the counts were taken more recently, a further analysis showed that this was not the case. This analysis required newer counts to be analyzed by the computer to separate the traffic volumes in each direction. Applying similar measures as before to the directional counts, it was clear that fewer vehicles were using the area for cut-through traffic. Westbound traffic was the most affected by this analysis, as traffic volumes decreased as the counts got further west of the intersection at 60th Street and Xerxes Avenue. The lowest count was just east of France Avenue, and indicated that only 422 vehicles a day were using westbound 60th Street to access France Avenue, which was approximately one-third of the westbound traffic entering the street at Xerxes Avenue. DKMBJ Engineering 3 Eastbound traffic showed a very different pattern, with volumes growing and diminishing as the counts moved away from 60th Street’s intersection with Xerxes Avenue. While the maximum count of eastbound vehicles observed was less than 1,300, at least 1388 vehicles used 60th Street to travel eastbound in this corridor. This indicates that when eastbound traffic is viewed separately than westbound traffic, up to 70% of the vehicles could be through traffic. When the eastbound and westbound traffic considered at the same time, the analysis reveals that approximately 50% of all vehicles could possibly be through traffic, having no connection to the neighborhood. An additional analysis was conducted on 60th Street comparing assumed rates of traffic to the observed rates of traffic at the neighborhood entrances. This analysis is similar to the analysis done on 58th Street. Again, it was assumed that 3,600 vehicles should be using 60th Street to get to and from their home. However, 3,875 total vehicles were observed entering or exiting the neighborhood. This indicates that fewer than 300 vehicles are using 60th Street to transverse from Xerxes Avenue to France Avenue. Speeds on 60th Street were below the speed limit of 30 mph at most locations. Only two locations had 85th-percentile speeds which exceeded the 30 mph speed limit of 60th Street. The few locations where the speeds were above the speed limit allows for traffic calming measures to be focused on these intersections and segments. 2.2 Traffic Calming Measures An investigation into traffic calming measures existing in the City of Edina was conducted in two locations. These locations were east of the intersection of Drew Avenue and 54th Street at the northern edge of the study area, and Tracy Avenue at Hawkes Drive. These locations were selected because traffic data was available prior to the implementing the traffic calming measures which could be used for comparison. Traffic counts can be found in Tables A-6 and A-11 in the appendix. Neighborhood traffic circles are small roundabouts placed in existing intersections (see Figure 2-2). The size of these circles is small enough that normal circulation is possible without adjusting the existing curbs of an intersection. On 54th Street, at the northern boundary of the neighborhoods being investigated in this study, neighborhood traffic circles were installed in conjunction with the creation of a bicycle boulevard in 2012. Between 2011 and 2015 the 85th-percentile speeds decreased by 3.7 mph. Misuse of this circle by drivers has been observed, with many drivers turning left in front of the circle instead of going all the way around. Because of these issues, a change in the design of the circle before it is implemented elsewhere should be considered. The options for changes include using the similar mini-roundabouts, adding signage, and adding a median before the neighborhood traffic circle to better direct traffic around the central island. DKMBJ Engineering 4 Figure 2-2: Example of Traffic Circle Bike lanes, narrowed lanes, parking bays, lowering the speed limit, and dynamic speed signs (the type which shows your speed and flashes if it is in excess of the posted speed limit) were all included during the reconstruction of Tracy Avenue. These treatments were accompanied by a reduction in the 85th-percentile speeds of 3.0 mph. The combinations of all these treatments may have actually made some of them less effective, as the bike lanes prevented the parking bays from narrowing the width of the street available to automobiles. Four-way stop signs are often thought of, incorrectly, as traffic calming. MnDOT states this in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MNDOT 2014). Two observations regarding all-way stop control were made in accordance to the traffic analysis conducted. On 58th Street at Beard Avenue, speed data from the blocks immediately east and west of the all- way stop control exhibited 85th-percentile speeds which were greater than the 85th-percentile speeds further from the stop control. In other words, vehicular traffic closer to the stop signs was actually going faster than vehicular traffic further from the stop signs. The segments directly surrounding the intersection of Chowen Avenue and 60th Street, which has an all-way stop control, were not seen to have lower 85th-percentile speeds than other points on 60th Street. This further confirms that these treatments do not reduce speeds nearby. 2.3 Vehicle Traffic Analysis Conclusions We have seen that 58th Street is not being used heavily for cut through traffic, with the corridor’s minimum count being only one-sixth of the vehicle count on the street at France Avenue. This is again supported by the volumes of cross streets being less than the volumes of vehicles entering and exiting the corridor by only 5%. This indicates that cut through traffic on this corridor is not DKMBJ Engineering 5 a major issue, especially as this street is designated as a Municipal State Aid street and has regional importance. We have also demonstrated that 58th Street acts as an important access point for the residences in this area. On 60th Street the two studies done were in conflict. With one indicating that eastbound traffic might be cutting through the neighborhood in large numbers, but another showing that there was not more traffic using the street than would be assumed if it was merely providing access to the neighborhood. To determine exactly how much traffic was cutting through the neighborhood would require extensive investigation, but it can be seen that less than 50% of all traffic in this corridor could be going the entire distance between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue. Speeds in the area are of some concern, and they can be influenced by the design of the streets in the future. The areas where the 85th-percentile speeds exceed the speed limit can be called out specifically for more intensive traffic calming measures. DKMBJ Engineering 6 3.0 Vehicle Parking Analysis The City of Edina has received numerous complaints about parking throughout the three neighborhoods, specifically in the northeast portion where 55th Street and 56th Street intersect York Avenue and in the south on the streets surrounding Strachauer Park. Residents would like the City to limit parking in these areas. DKMBJ Engineering is investigating current utilization rates and possible forms of parking limitations to address the concerns from residents. 3.1 Vehicle Parking Study DKMBJ Engineering performed a parking study in accordance with Parking Generation 4th edition from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (McCourt 2010). It was done throughout the three neighborhoods from Wednesday, February 11th through Sunday, February 15th. Parking counts were taken on Wednesday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday. Each day consisted of four counts, one in the morning (around 8 AM), one at midday (around 12 PM), one in the evening (around 5 PM), and one at night (around 9 PM). Based on concerns from residents, DKMBJ Engineering defined ten different zones in which to collect parking data, as is seen on Figure A-2. Parked cars were counted separately for north, south, east and west sides of the street. All cars parked on 55th Street in Zone 8 were considered to be on the north side and all cars parked on 56th Street were considered to be on the south side. It should be noted that some of the data collected during the study may not be an accurate representation of the average utilization. There are multiple home reconstruction projects throughout the neighborhood. These reconstruction projects had more cars parked outside during the day than the average home in the area. It can be assumed from the rest of our data that these anomalies will not continue once the construction is completed. The parking capacity of each zone was calculated in order to find the percent of utilization. To determine the capacity of each zone, the gross length of each parking zone was determined using Google Earth. Thirty (30) feet was subtracted from the gross length for controlled intersection and 20 feet was subtracted for uncontrolled intersections. Driveways were also considered, with driveway width and an additional 5 feet on either side of the driveway subtracted from the gross length. The remaining length was then divided by the standard parking stall length of 25 feet. To determine the percent utilization, the number of cars counted in each zone was divided by the total number of stalls in the zone. These percent utilization values can also be seen in Table 3-1. Parking utilization has been mapped for each day and time using the data from Table 3-1. These maps can be seen in Figures A-2 through A-4 in the appendix. DKMBJ Engineering 7 Table 3-1: Parking Utilization Weekday Capacity Percentages Saturday Capacity Percentages Sunday Capacity Percentages Zone Morning Midday Evening Late Morning Midday Evening Late Morning Midday Evening Late 1 N 0.267 0.267 0.067 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 S 0.182 0.182 0.182 0.091 0 0.182 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 N 0.556 0.333 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 S 0.727 0.727 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.182 3 N 0.063 0.063 0.031 0.063 0 0 0 0 0 0.063 0 0 3 S NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING 4 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 S 0.115 0.038 0.038 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.027 0 0 0 0.027 5 W 0 0.033 0 0 0 0 0 0.033 0 0.033 0 0 6 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 S 0.039 0 0.066 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 E 0 0.023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 E 0.058 0.094 0.022 0.014 0.014 0.072 0.014 0.014 0 0.058 0.072 0.029 7 W 0.123 0.105 0.114 0.105 0.018 0.018 0.053 0.018 0 0.035 0.018 0.018 8 N 0.036 0.036 0.179 0.179 0 0.071 0 0.071 0 0 0.071 0 8 S 0.063 0.563 0.5 0.438 0 0.5 1 1 0 0.375 0 0.125 8 E 0.063 0.031 0.094 0.063 0 0 0.188 0.313 0 0 0.125 0.063 8 W 0.063 0.094 0.063 0.063 0 0.25 0.125 0 0 0 0.0623 0.063 9 E 0.050 0.075 0.175 0.175 0 0 0.050 0.1 0 0.050 0.050 0.050 9 W 0 0.087 0.044 0.022 0 0 0.087 0.087 0 0.043 0.087 0.043 10 N 0 0.105 0 0 0 0 0.105 0 0 0.105 0 0 10 S NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING NO PARKING 3.2 Vehicle Parking Conclusion There are few discernible issues with parking throughout the neighborhoods. Specifically, Zone 2 on W 55th Street had multiple home reconstructions. These reconstructs were causing the high amount of on street parking usage. It should be expected that when the constructions are complete the need for on street parking will not be needed. Zone 8 is in close proximity to numerous small businesses and a gas station and displays high parking utilization during popular business hours. It should be noted that Zone 6 and the southern end of Zone 7 surround Strachauer Park. This park receives its heaviest traffic during the summer months and therefore the timing of this study may not have accurately reflected the full utilization of the parking surrounding Strachauer Park. DKMBJ Engineering 8 4.0 Pedestrian and Bike Traffic Analysis As a part of the neighborhood traffic study, DKMBJ Engineering was assigned the task of determining the best route for a bike route through the three neighborhoods. The City of Edina did not request a cost analysis for any portion of this task. This route is envisioned to be an extension of the highly utilized Edina Promenade, which currently terminates half of a mile south of TH 62; with a long range plan to connect the three neighborhoods to Minneapolis’ Grand Rounds Scenic Byway, which is a mile north along the south side of Lake Harriet. To connect the Promenade to the Strachauer Park neighborhood, Highway 62 must be crossed. The City of Edina has been considering adding a separate pedestrian bridge just to the east of the existing France Avenue Bridge. As an alternative, DKMBJ Engineering proposes adding a pedestrian bridge that connects Colony Way on the south side of TH 62 to Beard Place on the north side. Although both ideas include separate pedestrian bridges, DKMBJ Engineering’s proposal includes a necessary change in elevation to get over the highway, whereas the bridge next to France would cross over at the same elevation as the existing bridge. Although more convenient for pedestrians and bike travelers, the elevation change would require more sophisticated infrastructure resulting in an increased overall cost. The proposed route and pedestrian bridge options are shown in Figure A-5. The bike path shown in Figure A-5 would be implemented through a shared car and bike path option. An example of this street layout is shown in Figure 4-1. This example is a current picture of 54th Street on the north side of the three neighborhood area meaning that there is an added benefit of citizen familiarity with this type of implementation. Figure 4-1: Example Section of Proposed Bike Lane Road DKMBJ Engineering 9 5.0 Sustainability Our team has identified a few aspects of our project that will improve sustainability. To begin, the City of Edina has formulated the Living Streets Policy (Living Streets Policy 2013). This policy is being implemented throughout the City and includes efforts to incorporate sustainable living practices. Sustainability can be incorporated into road design in a number of different ways. One of the most basic practices to aid in sustainability is reducing the amount of impervious surfaces throughout a watershed. Impervious surfaces, like asphalt and concrete, cause precipitation that would otherwise drain through the ground, to be funneled into storm water systems, taking with it all of the chemicals and pollutants already on the ground. To minimize this effect, the Living Streets policy includes the idea of reducing road widths to allow for more pervious area. The parking study suggests that this reduction in road widths will not be an issue, especially if some of the new streets only allow one sided parking. Since some rainwater will inevitably collect on the roads, it is important to implement practices for filtering the runoff before it reaches the storm water system. Rain gardens with curb inlets are a simple but elegant way of filtering storm water runoff from the roads. This is why they are included as a part of the Living Streets vision. Not only do they have a practical use in filtering runoff, but they also add an aesthetically pleasing element to the streets in which they are added. One argument against these rain gardens is that the responsibility of keeping them maintained cannot be forced on residents and that they may be too expensive for the City to keep up with. The neighboring City of Bloomington began installing rain gardens in 2008 and has received very positive feedback from residents and visitors alike (Harrison 2014). To address the continuous maintenance of their rain gardens, the City of Bloomington only installed rain gardens where a homeowner voluntarily agreed to keep the area healthy. The City of Maplewood also has a quality rain garden program in which they educate residents on how to create and maintain their own rain gardens (Maplewood Public Works 2006). They also provide cost sharing options through various watershed agencies for anyone who wishes to participate in the program. DKMBJ Engineering 10 6.0 Recommendations DKMBJ Engineering has formulated recommendations regarding parking, and the proposed bike route connection to the Edina Promenade and Minneapolis’ Grand Rounds Scenic Byway. The following subsections are DKMBJ Engineering’s recommendations based on the analysis. 6.1 Vehicle Parking High parking utilization was found in two areas: 56th street near Xerxes Avenue, and at the St. Peter’s Lutheran Church on Fuller St. We recommend no changes to the parking structure in these two areas as they are close to, or at capacity. In the remaining area of study, our findings pointed to no need for special parking considerations. We recommend the City of Edina proceed as planned with their construction incorporating elements of Living Streets. 6.2 Pedestrian/Bike Route The proposed route for the Edina Promenade connection should proceed as follows: begin in Strachauer Park, continue north on Beard Avenue, turn east onto 57th Street, turn north onto Zenith Avenue, continue through York Park, and exit the City of Edina on 55th Street. We also recommend a separate pedestrian bridge over TH 62 that would connect Beard Avenue on the north side to Colony Way on the south. This proposed path can be seen in Figure A-5. This is seen at the better option due to the bridge’s ability to take pedestrians out of the busy, France Avenue and TH 62 intersection. However, a further cost analysis comparing the two options should be completed before a final decision is made. 6.3 Traffic Calming High speeds were an issue on both 58th Street and 60th Street. We recommend the inclusion of traffic calming circles at the intersections of 58th Street and Beard Avenue and 60th Street and Beard Avenue. Medians at each approach to the intersection could also be used to better direct traffic and reduce the misuse of the calming circle. 6.4 Sustainability We recommend that the City of Edina implements a rain garden program that draws on ideas from both Bloomington and Maplewood. Prior to installation of any rain gardens, the City should verify with nearby homeowners and other neighbors to ensure that they are willing to maintain the gardens in the future. They should also set up a program to educate residents on how to maintain them and provide them with cost sharing options if necessary. DKMBJ Engineering 11 8.0 References Google Maps (2015) “Edina, Minnesota Street Map” <https://www.google.com/maps/place/Edina,+MN/@44.8958335,-93.3595726,14z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x87f6213ace55a039:0xcdaf9c3796fa2779> (March 12, 2015) Harrison, Rich (2014). “Green Streets for Blue Waters.” <http://www.metroblooms.org/bloomsblog/green-streets-for-blue-waters/> (March 29, 2015). Living Streets Policy (2013) “Living Streets Overview.” City of Edina, Minnesota, <http://edinamn.gov/index.php?section=LivingStreets> (January 27, 2015). Maplewood Public Works (2006). “Rain Gardens on Maplewood Street Reconstruction Projects.” City of Maplewood, Minnesota <http://www.ci.maplewood.mn.us/DocumentCenter/View/246> (April 20, 2015). McCourt, R. S. (2010) “Parking Generation, 4th Ed., Institute of Transportation Engineers.” Washington, DC MNDOT (2014) “Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices” <http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/publ/mutcd/mnmutcd2014/mnmutcd-2b.pdf> (April 29, 2015) DKMBJ Engineering 13 9.0 Appendix Figure A-1: Existing Conditions DKMBJ Engineering A-1 Figure A-2: Weekday Parking Utilization DKMBJ Engineering A-2 Figure A-3: Saturday Parking Utilization DKMBJ Engineering A-3 Figure A-4: Sunday Parking Utilization DKMBJ Engineering A-4 APPENDIX J Resident Questionnaire 20.83%20 79.17%76 Q1 Does your property have drainage issues the City should know about?Examples: History of flooding/standing water, grading, backyard drain, nuisance sump pump, etc. Answered: 96 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 96 #PLEASE COMMENT ON THE TYPES PROBLEMS YOU HAVE:DATE 1 The gutters in front of my house and my neighbors to the north get flooded first when it rains. Water pools at the foot of my driveway and doesn’t drain away after a storm. 5829 Beard Ave S 8/17/2018 6:03 PM 2 There is always lots of standing water in the street in the front of our house. This has been like this since 2003 when we moved in. When our neighbors rebuilt their house, we are getting more water flow into our backward because that is where it was apparently slotted to go. 7/29/2018 1:16 PM 3 The property next door to us, on our north side, was torn down and rebuilt just over a year ago. They regraded that property improperly and has created water drainage issues for us. 7/2/2018 10:05 AM 4 While we are new to our house and are not aware of water issues. The house has a walkout in back. It does appear to have some grading issues - water running toward the house as it runs toward the backyard. Water pools in areas of the backyard. 7/1/2018 8:57 PM 5 Drains run slow from home to street.6/20/2018 6:04 PM 6 After big rains, we have lots of puddles between the street and our yard, which are hard to step across or around. 6/17/2018 4:44 PM 7 Water pools by NW corner of house and gets in basement during spring thaw, water also flows into basement at front of house during heavy rains 6/15/2018 9:49 PM 8 corner of 60th & Xerxes doesn't drain. With rain, Lake Xerxes forms.6/15/2018 2:51 PM 9 During big rains, water comes down the small hill at 59th and Zenith right into our yard then into the northwest corner of our basement. 6/12/2018 7:54 PM 10 Very significant standing water every spring, property is lower than 59th St., history of flooding indoors with new drain tile and sump installed 2015. 6/12/2018 2:52 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 1 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 11 possibly. 5809 Beard Av So. Interior sewer line runs above concrete floor - home built before street sewer work - lot level was lower than street originally. House was raised due to flooding and property filled up to level with neighbors along with storm sewers added in alley. Not sure if this complicates updating lines water and sewer lines from home to street. Home situation is stable since raising in mid 1970s. - not flooding or connection issues - were some questions about tree roots/turn in connection in street in June 2016 but no problems since. 6/12/2018 2:47 PM 12 Large pond of standing water from street into our driveway and yard every spring and when there is a heavy rain. We can not walk from our street to our house without going through the neighbors' yards. 6/12/2018 11:49 AM 13 Yes, the alley on 59th between Xerxes Avenue and York Avenue has flooding issues. The alley will be black topped along with the street projects. We are hoping that the alley will be graded to remove the gravel that has been added over 30+ years that has caused many driveways to be lower than the alley, causing the flooding 6/11/2018 12:12 PM 14 No but we a small hill right by the street that we would like graded down if possible 6/10/2018 2:58 PM 15 Backyard has an area that doesn’t drain well 6/9/2018 10:27 PM 16 Water drain on 58th erodes lawn and forms large puddles. Road is in need of a gutter.6/9/2018 3:19 PM 17 Our alley is unpaved and water from our property and others drain into it causing constant potholes. They are occasionally filled but a paved alley would solve the problem. 6/9/2018 2:04 PM 18 Standing water, ponding after rains 6/9/2018 1:02 PM 19 water pools at curb and smells 6/9/2018 11:14 AM 20 Water does not drain in street gutter. Standing water gets swampy and smelly.6/9/2018 11:07 AM 2 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 51.04%49 34.38%33 14.58%14 Q2 How concerned are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? Answered: 96 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 96 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 3 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%47 97.87%46 Q3 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 47 Skipped: 49 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Most of the length of the double long block 8/21/2018 10:07 AM 2 corner of 59th and Zenith 8/5/2018 9:08 PM 3 60th and Xerxes 8/5/2018 12:16 AM 4 All along 58th Street 7/29/2018 11:51 AM 5 5900 Zenith Ave block 7/18/2018 5:12 PM 6 58th street beard ave, four way stop 7/9/2018 3:38 PM 7 60th street between xerxes and france ave s 7/5/2018 3:12 PM 8 Chowen Avenue in between 58th Street & 60th Street 7/2/2018 10:05 AM 9 Chowen ave s, between 58th and 60th street 7/1/2018 8:57 PM 10 Drew Ave, b/t 58th and 60th 6/30/2018 1:11 PM 11 Double block encourages high speed.6/29/2018 8:54 PM 12 Ewing Avenue South between 58th and 60th 6/26/2018 10:23 AM 13 60th street 6/25/2018 9:50 PM 14 58th and 60th Street between France and Xerxes 6/25/2018 3:32 PM 15 5841 Zenith 6/23/2018 3:05 PM 16 60th Street between York and Zenith 6/20/2018 6:04 PM 17 5829 drew ave 6/19/2018 11:45 AM 18 Between 58th and 60th on Zenith Ave S 6/19/2018 8:00 AM 19 Beard between 58th & 60th 6/17/2018 5:11 PM 20 58th/59th Chowen 6/15/2018 7:49 PM 21 Northeast corner of w 60th street and Chowen ave 6/15/2018 5:40 PM 22 60th & Xerxes 6/15/2018 2:51 PM 23 York Ave S. between 58th and 60th Streets 6/15/2018 9:17 AM 24 56-60th Ewing Ave 6/14/2018 7:36 PM 25 59th and York 6/14/2018 7:14 PM 26 Xerxes Ave.6/14/2018 4:19 PM 27 59th street and Zenith Ave | 57th street and Zenith Ave 6/13/2018 6:22 PM 28 60th Street between Xerxes and France 6/12/2018 6:53 PM 29 59th and York 6/12/2018 2:52 PM 30 58th and Beard stop sign - often ignored or site of rolling stops. Also alley between Beard and Abbott - people do not obey speed signs 6/12/2018 2:47 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 4 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 31 58th street 6/12/2018 11:49 AM 32 Chowen and Chowen curve between 56th and 60th 6/12/2018 9:21 AM 33 All throughout neighborhood 6/11/2018 7:27 PM 34 58th street between France and Xerxes 6/11/2018 6:01 PM 35 60th Street 6/11/2018 5:49 PM 36 Beard Ave - 58th St and south 6/11/2018 10:04 AM 37 58th and 60th between France and Xerxes 6/10/2018 2:58 PM 38 58th Street/60th Street 6/10/2018 2:54 PM 39 58th and Chowen 6/10/2018 2:51 PM 40 59th and Zenith 6/10/2018 9:08 AM 41 Corner of Chowen and 60th 6/10/2018 8:06 AM 42 57th and Zenith 6/10/2018 7:32 AM 43 On Ewing Ave S Between 58th and 60th streets 6/9/2018 10:27 PM 44 York Ave north of 60th - drivers heading south toward 60th 6/9/2018 2:58 PM 45 59th and York 6/9/2018 2:04 PM 46 intersection at 58th & Beard 6/9/2018 11:14 AM 47 58th and Beard 6/9/2018 11:07 AM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 Kids, walkers, pets, noise. Due to the curve from 56th street feeding into Chowen and the traffic going from 58th to 60th (due to stop sign config Chowen is best cut-over point for people coming from Hwy100 to points east who stay on main East/West roads ie 58th until Xerxes, 60th after) we get a lot of pass thru traffic in a hurry. Not that interested in speed bumps due to noise. 8/21/2018 10:07 AM 2 people don't slow down for the intersections in the area 8/5/2018 9:08 PM 3 Speeders trying to beat the new signal 8/5/2018 12:16 AM 4 Because I see multiple vehicles speeding up every day, and I am concerned for the children living in the area. 7/29/2018 11:51 AM 5 Unmarked intersection 7/18/2018 5:12 PM 6 people dont fully stop at the stop signs, or dont stop at all and they are driving way over the speed limit 7/9/2018 3:38 PM 7 cars go way too fast, and many roll or out right run the stop sign on 60th and chowen ave 7/5/2018 3:12 PM 8 It is a cut through between the lights at 58th & France and 60th & Xerxes. Our street is really 2 blocks long with no stops. People roll through the stop sign at 60th & Chowen. Would love traffic calming measures on our street to slow traffic plus an enhanced cross walk at 58th & Chowen - to safely cross to/from Chowen Park. 7/2/2018 10:05 AM 9 Our block is two blocks long. For this reason, people appear to take it as shortcut knowing there is one less intersection. They also speed down it knowing there is no intersection 7/1/2018 8:57 PM 10 Since this is stretch of street is two blocks long without a stop sign, cars are often speeding and there a lot of kids on this block 6/30/2018 1:11 PM 11 Cars use this as a cut-through and drive VERY fast. There are lots of small children in the neighborhood and with plenty of one-car garage homes, lots of parking on the street. There are no sidewalks. 6/26/2018 10:23 AM 12 Small children in the neighborhood. No sidewalks for pedestrians to safely avoid traffic.6/25/2018 9:50 PM 13 People driving too fast 6/25/2018 3:32 PM 5 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 14 cars cut from 60th all the way down to 55th using Zenith. They don't want to come up the hill from Xerxes to Zenith. They travel sometimes 25-30 miles per hour even when they see children playing in the streets. Very dangerous. A 4-way stop sign should be put in at 59th and Zenith and 58th and Zenith. Cars travel over the speed limit between France and Xerxes on 58th also. Very tired on this. I never see any police using speed traps. Tired on my street being used as a thoroughfare. 6/23/2018 3:05 PM 15 Traffic is heavy and sometimes very fast at rush hour periods.6/20/2018 6:04 PM 16 Many children playing. 2 straight blocks. Drivers that do not live on our street don’t realize the amount of children playing. 6/19/2018 11:45 AM 17 Drivers speed between 60th and 58th. A stop sign at 59th might help.6/19/2018 8:00 AM 18 speed is sometimes a factor and construction vehicles seem to use it as a cut through street 6/17/2018 5:11 PM 19 The street seems to be used as a thoroughfare by drivers wanting to avoid France Avenue. Most cars seems to drive too fast for a residential neighborhood with many children and dog walkers present. 6/15/2018 7:49 PM 20 I see many vehicles drive through the stop sign.6/15/2018 5:40 PM 21 30mph limit not enforced and has increased since the stoplight was installed!6/15/2018 2:51 PM 22 The addition of traffic lights with no turning lanes at the intersection of Xerxes and 60th St causes longer backups than when it was a 4-way stop. Several drivers use York Ave as a way to bypass the red light and often drive too fast for neighborhood with small children. 6/15/2018 9:17 AM 23 People use as a cut through to miss the lights on France and drive fast.6/14/2018 7:36 PM 24 Cars speed by occasionally, better with light on 60th and Xerxes 6/14/2018 7:14 PM 25 Cars go faster now that there is a stoplight at 60th.6/14/2018 4:19 PM 26 There are ZERO stop signs at these intersections. Drivers who don't live in neighborhood speed through intersections without looking for cross traffic. B/c we don't have sidewalks, children play in the street. it's dangerous 6/13/2018 6:22 PM 27 Cars tend to go at least 10 miles over the speed limit and many roll through the Chowen intersection 6/12/2018 6:53 PM 28 No stop sign on York. Many people do not stop at the stop sign on 59th. Cars get going very fast and I have seen cars slam on their brakes to avoid hitting children. 6/12/2018 2:52 PM 29 Alley - site lines to people walking or children in alley are obscured with garages - speed should be reduced 6/12/2018 2:47 PM 30 We would like to be able to bike or walk from our house to Pamela Park, neighborhood ice-cream shop, tennis courts, 50th and France, middle school..., but there is not a safe path. 6/12/2018 11:49 AM 31 many new young families have moved into the neighborhood over the past 5-10 years and Chowen used by an increasing number of speeders especially cutting through between 58th and 60th. 6/12/2018 9:21 AM 32 Rich kids driving daddy's Benzo and Rovers are not careful 6/11/2018 7:27 PM 33 I walk five blocks on this stretch every morning and evening en route to the bus. People drive faster than 25mph and there are no sidewalks. 6/11/2018 6:01 PM 34 Difficult to see before pulling out onto 60th 6/11/2018 5:49 PM 35 Edina school busses and many trucks go too fast.6/11/2018 10:04 AM 36 Everything drives very fast going from France towards Xerxes 6/10/2018 2:58 PM 37 No one goes the posted speed limit 6/10/2018 2:54 PM 38 Kids crossing to the park. Living on corner, I see MANY near misses 6/10/2018 2:51 PM 39 Amazon drivers speed in and out as well as some other drivers.6/10/2018 9:08 AM 40 Lots of children in the neighborhood and many don't stop at the stop sign, especially during rush hour when kids are at bus stops. 6/10/2018 8:06 AM 41 Traffic on 57 goes fast and the intersection is uncontrolled 6/10/2018 7:32 AM 42 Two block street that drivers speed up especially during backups on France 6/9/2018 10:27 PM 6 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 43 Safety 6/9/2018 2:58 PM 44 No sidewalks and cars fly down York between 58th and 60th.6/9/2018 2:04 PM 45 speed, do not stop at sign 6/9/2018 11:14 AM 46 Cars travel fast on 58th, often go through stop sign at 58th and Beard 6/9/2018 11:07 AM 7 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 68.75%66 23.96%23 7.29%7 Q4 How concerned are you with the volume of traffic or the number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? Answered: 96 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 96 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 8 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%29 89.66%26 Q5 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 29 Skipped: 67 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Full length of double block 8/21/2018 10:08 AM 2 60th france area 7/28/2018 6:00 PM 3 57th through 60th Drew 7/25/2018 10:31 AM 4 Road is used as a cut through instead of staying on France or Xerxes 6/29/2018 8:56 PM 5 Chowen Ave & other streets 6/27/2018 6:25 PM 6 Ewing Avenue So. between 58th and 60th.6/26/2018 10:25 AM 7 Zenith from 60th to 56th and 58th from France to Xerxes 6/23/2018 3:06 PM 8 60th Streer between York and Zenith 6/20/2018 6:06 PM 9 Beard between 58th & 60th 6/17/2018 5:12 PM 10 58th/59th Chowen 6/15/2018 7:50 PM 11 At rush hour many vehicles use 60th street as alternate route.6/15/2018 5:41 PM 12 60th & Xerxes 6/15/2018 2:52 PM 13 York Ave S. between 58th and 60th Streets 6/15/2018 9:17 AM 14 56-60the ave ewing 6/14/2018 7:36 PM 15 Zenith Ave between 58th and 60th stree 6/13/2018 6:23 PM 16 We just have a lot of construction traffic, noise and smell constantly in our neighborhood.6/12/2018 11:50 AM 17 58th Ave S 6/11/2018 8:05 PM 18 Xerxes 6/11/2018 7:28 PM 19 All streets 6/11/2018 6:54 PM 20 Beard Ave - 58th street and south 6/11/2018 10:06 AM 21 58th Between France and Xerxes 6/10/2018 6:41 PM 22 58th and 60th between France and Xerxes 6/10/2018 3:00 PM 23 59th and Zenith 6/10/2018 9:09 AM 24 Chowen and 60th. Seems to be more traffic on 60th lately.6/10/2018 8:08 AM 25 Ewing Ave S between 58th and 60th Streets 6/9/2018 10:27 PM 26 58th Street 6/9/2018 3:57 PM 27 60 th street 6/9/2018 2:15 PM 28 intersection at 58th & Beard 6/9/2018 11:15 AM 29 58th and Beard 6/9/2018 11:08 AM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 9 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 1 Kids, walkers, pets, noise. Due to the curve from 56th street feeding into Chowen and the traffic going from 58th to 60th (due to stop sign config Chowen is best cut-over point for people coming from Hwy100 to points east who stay on main East/West roads ie 58th until Xerxes, 60th after) we get a lot of pass thru traffic in a hurry. 8/21/2018 10:08 AM 2 Getting very high density 7/28/2018 6:00 PM 3 Because of all the large trucks - 18 wheelers and tractor type vehicles used in all the # of tear downs and new homes being built in this area & elsewhere. The contractors & all involved in this work should be responsible to cover the cost of rebuilding our roads, not those of us who have lived here for 40-50 or more years. We have paid dearly through our taxes to keep our streets in good condition. 7/25/2018 10:31 AM 4 many large vehicles for construction/tear-downs, adds congestion & noise 6/27/2018 6:25 PM 5 Many cars use this double-long block as a cut-through, on their way to France since there is only a stop-sign on 60th at France, and turning onto France is difficult. 6/26/2018 10:25 AM 6 Always speedying and using street as a cut-through 6/23/2018 3:06 PM 7 As commuters look for easier in to/out of the neighborhood volume has become heavy 6/20/2018 6:06 PM 8 I think it's used as a cut-through street sometimes 6/17/2018 5:12 PM 9 4-6 pm seems to be especially heavy traffic, likely drivers wanting to avoid France Avenue 6/15/2018 7:50 PM 10 NOISE, weight of big vehicles going over 30mph shakes the house 6/15/2018 2:52 PM 11 The addition of traffic lights with no turning lanes at the intersection of Xerxes and 60th St causes longer backups than when it was a 4-way stop. Several drivers use York Ave as a way to bypass the red light which increases volume of "non-local" through traffic in a neighborhood with small children. 6/15/2018 9:17 AM 12 same reason as before, people use as a cut through to avoid france ave traffic 6/14/2018 7:36 PM 13 we suspect that drivers are using Zenith as a thru street 6/13/2018 6:23 PM 14 Increased traffic 6/11/2018 8:05 PM 15 Traffic backs up due to the dumb concrete things placed along curbs. They prevent cars from being able to enter right lane for turns. Too much development on Xerxes south of 62. Too many drivers improperly use Xerxes as a means of commuting downtown. 6/11/2018 7:28 PM 16 The number of trash haulers. Terrible for the roads. We need a single provider through competitive bid 6/11/2018 6:54 PM 17 Beard seems to be a major throughfare, not a residential street.6/11/2018 10:06 AM 18 Sometimes there’s too much traffic backed up @ stop sign 6/10/2018 6:41 PM 19 Similar to #3, mostly during rush hour 6/10/2018 3:00 PM 20 With all of the new construction, there are so many trucks coming and going.6/10/2018 9:09 AM 21 Distracted drivers, not stopping at stop signs. Lots of children and pets in the neighborhood. We don't have sidewalks, so kids are biking on the street. 6/10/2018 8:08 AM 22 Many children on the two block street with no sidewalk 6/9/2018 10:27 PM 23 Concerned 58th could become main route through Chowen Park - between France and Xerxes 6/9/2018 3:57 PM 24 too much traffic 6/9/2018 2:15 PM 25 lots of traffic in morning and evening 6/9/2018 11:15 AM 26 During rush hour there seems to be lots of traffic cutting through the neighborhood on 58th between France and Xerxes. Volume and speed are a concern, as well as not stopping at stop signs. 6/9/2018 11:08 AM 10 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 47.37%45 37.89%36 14.74%14 Q6 How concerned are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Examples of poor motorist behavior include speeding, rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively.) Answered: 95 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 95 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 11 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 98.00%49 90.00%45 Q7 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 50 Skipped: 46 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Stop signs on 60th and Chowen - cars traveling East/West on 60th.8/21/2018 10:17 AM 2 all areas around 59th and Zenith 8/5/2018 9:12 PM 3 60th at Xerxes 8/5/2018 12:16 AM 4 All along 58th Street 7/29/2018 11:52 AM 5 5900 Zenith Ave S block 7/18/2018 5:14 PM 6 58th st between Xerxes and Concord Ave 7/9/2018 7:39 PM 7 58th street 7/9/2018 3:40 PM 8 roll or run stop sign on 60th and chowen 7/5/2018 3:14 PM 9 Everything between 58th & Chowen, on Chowen up to 60th & Chowen 7/2/2018 10:07 AM 10 Chowen ave s between 58th and 60th 7/1/2018 8:57 PM 11 Drew Ave b/t 58th and 60th 6/30/2018 1:12 PM 12 People just drive fast.6/29/2018 8:56 PM 13 Ewing Avenue So between 58th and 60th 6/26/2018 10:26 AM 14 60th and Abbott 6/25/2018 9:53 PM 15 58th and 60th Street 6/25/2018 3:33 PM 16 Zenith Ave from 60th to 56 and 58th from France to Xerxes 6/23/2018 3:08 PM 17 Between 58th and 60th on Zenith Ave S 6/19/2018 8:02 AM 18 59th & Zenith 6/17/2018 10:58 PM 19 Beard between 58th & 60th 6/17/2018 5:13 PM 20 Chowen and 60th 6/15/2018 9:50 PM 21 58th/59th Chowen 6/15/2018 7:52 PM 22 Last city street north of hwy 62 for alteernate route 6/15/2018 5:42 PM 23 60th & Xerxes 6/15/2018 2:53 PM 24 York Ave S. between 58th and 60th Streets 6/15/2018 9:17 AM 25 56-60th Ewing ave 6/14/2018 7:37 PM 26 59th and York 6/14/2018 7:16 PM 27 Xerxes 6/14/2018 4:21 PM 28 59th and Zenith Ave | 57th and Zenith Ave 6/13/2018 6:24 PM 29 58th and Beard 6/12/2018 10:41 PM 30 59th and Zenith intersection 6/12/2018 7:56 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 12 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 31 60th and Chowen; described in previous question 6/12/2018 6:56 PM 32 59th and York 6/12/2018 2:53 PM 33 58th street - no stops or rolling stops often noticed 6/12/2018 2:49 PM 34 everywhere 6/12/2018 9:23 AM 35 All throughout 6/11/2018 7:28 PM 36 58thStreet between France and Xerxes and the Chowen Park area 6/11/2018 6:03 PM 37 58th and Beard 6/11/2018 5:16 PM 38 58th & Beard, 58th & France 6/11/2018 10:07 AM 39 58th and 60th between France and Xerxes 6/10/2018 3:04 PM 40 58th Street 6/10/2018 2:56 PM 41 58th and Chowen 6/10/2018 2:53 PM 42 59th and Zenith 6/10/2018 9:10 AM 43 Corner of 60th and Chowen 6/10/2018 8:08 AM 44 57th and Zenith 6/10/2018 7:33 AM 45 Ewing Ave S between 57th and 60th Streets 6/9/2018 10:29 PM 46 60 th street 6/9/2018 2:16 PM 47 59th and York 6/9/2018 2:06 PM 48 intersection at 58th & Beard 6/9/2018 11:15 AM 49 58th and Beard 6/9/2018 11:09 AM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 Probably due to it being on the bottom of a hill, many during rush hour(s) just drive through at almost full speed. For what it's worth I'm generally not that upset by "normal" roll thru's at like 2-5 mph but we are talking like 25+ mph. When you turn onto 60th from Chowen I seen panic stops from "surprised" (despite having a stop sign) drivers almost weekly. 8/21/2018 10:17 AM 2 again, not slowing down for intersections 8/5/2018 9:12 PM 3 The new signal confuses drivers 8/5/2018 12:16 AM 4 Because I see multiple vehicles speeding up every day, and I am concerned for the children living in the area. 7/29/2018 11:52 AM 5 occasional speeders 7/18/2018 5:14 PM 6 bikers or motorcyclists rarely stop at the stop signs or just do a rolling stop 7/9/2018 3:40 PM 7 dangerous for children and adults walking across 60th street 7/5/2018 3:14 PM 8 See previous answer on earlier question- it is a perceived faster cut through the neighborhood to bypass the lights at 58th & France and also at 60th & Xerxes 7/2/2018 10:07 AM 9 Block is two blocks long. With no intersection at 59th and Chowen, drivers speed down Chowen.7/1/2018 8:57 PM 10 Speeding since this stretch is two blocks long w/o a stop sign; there a lot of kids who live on this street 6/30/2018 1:12 PM 11 although rolling through stop signs is common 6/27/2018 6:26 PM 12 As previously mentioned. Many non-residents use this 2-block stretch as a "fast" cut-through.6/26/2018 10:26 AM 13 Crossing 60th with a small child to reach parks, etc. requires being extra alert. Cars parked on 60th can block views for making turns. 6/25/2018 9:53 PM 14 primarily speeding 6/25/2018 3:33 PM 15 Cars speed and ignore the pedestrians using their residential neighborhood 6/23/2018 3:08 PM 16 Speeding is an issue.6/19/2018 8:02 AM 13 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 17 Some people blow through the intersection 6/17/2018 10:58 PM 18 cars don't always move over or slow down 6/17/2018 5:13 PM 19 sometimes cars don’t stop at 4 way stop signs 6/15/2018 9:50 PM 20 most cars seem to exceed speed for a residential neighborhood 6/15/2018 7:52 PM 21 yellow lights only increase speed of impatient motorists 6/15/2018 2:53 PM 22 The addition of traffic lights with no turning lanes at the intersection of Xerxes and 60th St causes longer backups than when it was a 4-way stop. Several drivers use York Ave as a way to bypass the red light and often drive too fast for neighborhood with small children. 6/15/2018 9:17 AM 23 speed of motorist and lots of kids playing 6/14/2018 7:37 PM 24 Frequent speeding cars 6/14/2018 7:16 PM 25 Really?6/14/2018 4:21 PM 26 ZERO stop signs at these intersections. Drivers neither stop nor slow down at intersections to look for cross traffic. B/c we don't have sidewalks, children play in street. it's dangerous. 6/13/2018 6:24 PM 27 cars on 58th don't stop, slow down and think they have the right of way.6/12/2018 10:41 PM 28 It is very hard to see the traffic on 59th when you are entering the intersection from the north side on Zenith. There are a lot of kids in the area. 6/12/2018 7:56 PM 29 Both rolling through stop signs and high speeds are of concern. People will speed down York when traffic on Xerxes is backed up. We have 11 children 3 year’s and younger on our block so this is a big concern of mine. 6/12/2018 2:53 PM 30 I know 58th is a connector street but it is in the middle of a neighborhood with no business activity 6/12/2018 2:49 PM 31 Careless drivers, unaware of rules of the road. We walk our dog frequently and can never count on cars to stop while waiting to cross. Pedestrians are also to blame, especially the ones who do not walk against/facing traffic. They must not teach that rule any longer. 6/12/2018 9:23 AM 32 It's usually only the younger people 6/11/2018 7:28 PM 33 People speed—not all people, but enough that it is concerning for parents with young kids walking, riding bikes and scooters, etc. 6/11/2018 6:03 PM 34 motorists roll through the stop sign 6/11/2018 5:16 PM 35 Failing to stop, MTC busses speeding up to beat the yellow light.6/11/2018 10:07 AM 36 Similar to other questions, bad behavior in general 6/10/2018 3:04 PM 37 Speeding 6/10/2018 2:56 PM 38 failing to yield to pedestrians. Lots of families on Chowen south of 58th heading to park 6/10/2018 2:53 PM 39 The Amazon drivers are the worst.6/10/2018 9:10 AM 40 Many don't stop at the stop sign 6/10/2018 8:08 AM 41 Traffic on 57 goes fast and the intersection is uncontrolled 6/10/2018 7:33 AM 42 Many children on Ewing Ave and motorists use it as a cut through to avoid backups on France 6/9/2018 10:29 PM 43 People are usually courteous, but many speed down York and there are more and more kids on York. 6/9/2018 2:06 PM 44 roll through stop sign, too fast 6/9/2018 11:15 AM 45 Lots of fast traffic on 58th during rush hour, often rolling through stop sign at 58th and Beard 6/9/2018 11:09 AM 14 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 24.62%16 15.38%10 60.00%39 Q8 In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Answered: 65 Skipped: 31 TOTAL 65 Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or running 15 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 65.22%60 34.78%32 Q9 Do you feel that any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? Answered: 92 Skipped: 4 TOTAL 92 #IF YES, WHICH INTERSECTION?DATE 1 60th and Xerxes 8/5/2018 12:17 AM 2 58th and France 7/29/2018 1:17 PM 3 57th and Ewing 7/28/2018 6:02 PM 4 58th and Drew 7/25/2018 10:34 AM 5 59th and Zenith Ave S 7/18/2018 5:14 PM 6 58 & France 7/9/2018 7:39 PM 7 58th and beard ave, 58th france ave 7/9/2018 3:42 PM 8 60th and france is really dangerous also 7/5/2018 3:16 PM 9 Both 58th & Chowen and 60th & Chowen 7/2/2018 10:09 AM 10 58th & Drew, south side of intersection; 60th & Drew looking west 6/30/2018 1:14 PM 11 58th and Chowen. Site lines to East when traveling aouthhavw always been restricted.6/29/2018 8:59 PM 12 59th Abbott 6/29/2018 2:05 PM 13 56th & Beard 6/27/2018 6:29 PM 14 60th and France 6/26/2018 10:32 AM 15 59th and zenith 6/23/2018 3:09 PM 16 Trying to turn south on France Ave. from 60th street is often impossible and drivers are taking risks to fight their way onto France. 6/20/2018 6:08 PM 17 The tree on the NE corner of drew and 58th is an obstruction!6/19/2018 11:47 AM 18 59th and Zenith could use a stop sign.6/19/2018 8:03 AM 19 each of the uncontrolled intersections; not all drivers slow down to see if others are coming 6/17/2018 5:14 PM 20 Zenith Ave and 59th Street 6/17/2018 4:45 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 16 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 21 58th and Chowen 6/15/2018 7:52 PM 22 60th & Xerxes 6/15/2018 2:55 PM 23 Ev Av South and 57th st 6/15/2018 10:49 AM 24 Xerxes/60th as well as France/58th 6/15/2018 9:19 AM 25 56 and Ewing 100% will be a major accident there at some point 6/14/2018 7:38 PM 26 60th and France 6/14/2018 7:19 PM 27 Clear View is no inforced at end of alleys & many intersections even when city is notified!6/13/2018 7:52 PM 28 59 St and Zenith Ave | 57th St and Zenith Ave 6/13/2018 6:25 PM 29 58th and Beard. See question above 6/12/2018 10:41 PM 30 59th and Zenith 6/12/2018 7:57 PM 31 60th and France; view on to France is often obstructed; drivers going north on France often cross the yellow line to pass someone turning east on to 69 th 6/12/2018 7:00 PM 32 59th and York 6/12/2018 2:54 PM 33 58th and Beard stop sign issues 6/12/2018 2:50 PM 34 57th & beard 6/12/2018 9:24 AM 35 59th and York needs a four-way stop 6/11/2018 7:29 PM 36 60th and France, 58th and Drew 6/11/2018 6:56 PM 37 57th and Abbott Ave 6/11/2018 6:11 PM 38 58th and Chowen 6/11/2018 6:03 PM 39 60th & Zenith 6/11/2018 5:50 PM 40 Drew and 60tg, cannot see west due to retaining wall on house 6/11/2018 3:26 PM 41 york and 56 6/11/2018 2:09 PM 42 58th & Beard 6/11/2018 10:08 AM 43 60th and France 6/10/2018 6:43 PM 44 60th and Drew 6/10/2018 3:06 PM 45 60th/ Drew Ave 6/10/2018 2:58 PM 46 58th and Chowen 6/10/2018 2:54 PM 47 All 6/10/2018 1:09 PM 48 Corner of Chowen and 60th.6/10/2018 8:09 AM 49 57th and Zenith 6/10/2018 7:34 AM 50 Ewing Ave S on 58th and 60th streets 6/9/2018 10:35 PM 51 58th Beard 6/9/2018 6:25 PM 52 58th and France.6/9/2018 3:21 PM 53 60 th and france 6/9/2018 2:17 PM 54 57th and Zenith, 57th and Abbott. Both could use a stop sign.6/9/2018 2:08 PM 55 60th and Beard Ave S 6/9/2018 1:06 PM 56 intersection at 58th & Beard 6/9/2018 11:15 AM 57 58th and Beard 6/9/2018 11:10 AM 17 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 36.67%22 50.00%30 21.67%13 16.67%10 13.33%8 10.00%6 1.67%1 0.00%0 38.33%23 Q10 Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) Answered: 60 Skipped: 36 Total Respondents: 60 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 No sidewalk heading west on 58th towards Pamela Park, this needs to be created. It's not safe for any family to try and navigate to the park. 7/29/2018 1:17 PM Lack of traffic cont... Issues with sight lines ... Drivers failing to s... Drivers failing to... Drivers turning corn... Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 18 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 2 The evergreen on the NE corner of 58th and Drew interferes with traffic coming from the east 7/25/2018 10:34 AM 3 Cannot see around south east corner too much growth 7/5/2018 3:16 PM 4 We don't have natural landscaping, e.g. large trees on boulevards along Chowen Avenue between 58th & 60th to create traffic calming - currently can feel like a 2 block open speedway to some drivers 7/2/2018 10:09 AM 5 overgrowth of vegetation blocking view from south side of 58th and Drew looking west 6/30/2018 1:14 PM 6 this intersection has lots of foot traffic going north to the creek, could use stop signs for north- south traffic. Worse right now because a large dumpster is blocking traffic view for eastbound 56th St. 6/27/2018 6:29 PM 7 While there is a stop-sign on 60th at France, this is not sufficient for the volume of traffic, and creates the (perceived) need to cut through the neighborhood for an intersection with better traffic control (58th and France). 6/26/2018 10:32 AM 8 traffic speeds from all directions in spite of seeing familys and small children. Need a 4 way stop sign 6/23/2018 3:09 PM 9 It may be due to lack of traffic control or just the design of that intersection.6/20/2018 6:08 PM 10 increased speed on Xerxes 6/15/2018 2:55 PM 11 Need turning lanes 6/15/2018 9:19 AM 12 Streets are not too wide. The new narrow streets are a huge safety concern to me.6/12/2018 11:52 AM 13 drivers not paying attention at and uncontrolled intersection 6/12/2018 9:24 AM 14 Big potholes in intersection 6/10/2018 6:43 PM 15 Driving too fast 6/10/2018 3:06 PM 16 Can’t see if on coming traffic is coming from France, cause of the retaining wall. You’re all the way in the street before you know if you can turn left onto 60th from Drew Ave 6/10/2018 2:58 PM 17 No sidewalks and kids in street 6/10/2018 2:54 PM 18 No sidewalks 6/10/2018 1:09 PM 19 No sidewalks 6/9/2018 10:35 PM 20 Lack of sidewalk/crosswalk adequate to stop and prepare to cross road, particularly if you have a stroller or small children. 6/9/2018 3:21 PM 21 too much traffic 6/9/2018 2:17 PM 22 Large SUVs parked on 60th block view of oncoming traffic when exiting Beard Ave southbound 6/9/2018 1:06 PM 23 Rush hour traffic cutting through the neighborhood on 58th between France and Xerxes 6/9/2018 11:10 AM 19 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 59.09%39 7.58%5 33.33%22 Q11 In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: Answered: 66 Skipped: 30 TOTAL 66 Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging,... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, running 20 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 50.54%47 24.73%23 19.35%18 5.38%5 0.00%0 Q12 How frequently do you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood? Answered: 93 Skipped: 3 TOTAL 93 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 21 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 89.13%82 41.30%38 32.61%30 17.39%16 7.61%7 7.61%7 1.09%1 2.17%2 Q13 If you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Answered: 92 Skipped: 4 Total Respondents: 92 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 nice to walk the neighborhood 7/5/2018 3:17 PM 2 enjoying the neighborhood and its beauty 6/12/2018 2:51 PM Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) t... Travel to/from destination... Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 22 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q14 If you don't walk, jog or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Answered: 22 Skipped: 74 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Amount of traffic, particularly when dusk/dark which is pretty early in the winter obviously.8/21/2018 10:23 AM 2 Nothing related to the roads; it’s laziness 8/17/2018 6:05 PM 3 Our neighborhood is perfect for walking, streets are wide enough, not a lot of traffic. I just don't walk!! 8/5/2018 9:24 PM 4 Not enough time in the day.7/29/2018 11:54 AM 5 laziness.7/11/2018 9:05 AM 6 I would feel more comfortable allowing my children to access Chowen Park on their own, if there was something like an enhanced crosswalk at the intersection of 58th & Chowen. For now, I prefer to have an adult go with them for safety reasons. They are 8 & 10 years old and safe walkers and bikers but vehicle traffic does not typically watch for them. 7/2/2018 10:11 AM 7 Since there are no sidewalks, I only run during certain times of day and avoid certain streets. Same with walking my kid to the park - only certain times of day and certain streets. 6/30/2018 1:15 PM 8 Minnesota weather 6/27/2018 6:30 PM 9 I often stop walking when cars are approaching as they go FAST! I walk anyway, but it is unnerving. 6/26/2018 10:33 AM 10 fast speedy cars are so outrageous 6/23/2018 3:10 PM 11 The neighborhood is owned by the automobile.6/20/2018 6:09 PM 12 Lack of sidewalks, lack of destinations (e.g. coffee shops, casual family locations)6/17/2018 5:15 PM 13 lack of sidewalks 6/14/2018 7:38 PM 14 Me 6/14/2018 4:21 PM 15 Uneven payment and pot holes.6/13/2018 7:54 PM 16 We are outside as often as we want to be. We ARE NOT interested in sidewalks, just would like our intersection to be a bit safer. 6/12/2018 2:55 PM 17 Lack of sidewalks and proper lighting lead to it not being safe when its dark 6/11/2018 7:29 PM 18 I would walk more if we had SIDEWALKS 6/11/2018 6:04 PM 19 Lack of sidewalks and more traffic 6/10/2018 2:54 PM 20 No sidewalks 6/9/2018 10:35 PM 21 weather 6/9/2018 2:17 PM 22 We really wish there were sidewalks, it's pretty unsafe for kids to ride their bikes.6/9/2018 9:45 AM 23 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 7.61%7 19.57%18 25.00%23 21.74%20 26.09%24 Q15 How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Answered: 92 Skipped: 4 TOTAL 92 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 24 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 84.62%55 33.85%22 32.31%21 1.54%1 0.00%0 3.08%2 4.62%3 Q16 If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Answered: 65 Skipped: 31 Total Respondents: 65 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 Leisure entertainment 6/12/2018 3:18 PM 2 enjoy the neighborhood and its beauty 6/12/2018 2:52 PM 3 Hi 6/11/2018 6:08 PM Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) t... Travel to/from destination... Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 25 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q17 If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Answered: 20 Skipped: 76 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Volume of traffic has some impact, but generally feel safe on roads as ours are generally nice and wide. 8/21/2018 10:23 AM 2 No bike lanes 7/1/2018 9:00 PM 3 Narrow street on 58th west of France often has parked cars making for narrow lanes - often dangerous to bike/walk to Pamela Park. 6/30/2018 1:17 PM 4 If I did ride a bike, I would be concerned about potholes. It is easier to avoid them on foot than on a bicycle. 6/27/2018 6:32 PM 5 I do ride when I want, but again, I have a general comfort on the roads. 58th and 60th have VERY fast traffic, regardless of the fact that 58th is marked 25 mph. It is NEVER patrolled, nor do we see much on 60th. 6/26/2018 10:35 AM 6 Not into bicycling.6/25/2018 9:55 PM 7 Too much auto traffic with no safe place to ride.6/20/2018 6:10 PM 8 Safety is a concern. Drivers speed and don’t pay attention to young children. There are often no sidewalks so only option is to ride with kids in the street. 6/19/2018 8:04 AM 9 Lack of bike lanes, sidewalks, family destinations 6/17/2018 5:15 PM 10 prefer other methods of exercise, don't trust motorists to yield 6/15/2018 2:59 PM 11 poor roads, very bumpy and pot holes 6/14/2018 7:39 PM 12 Our son will be riding a bike soon and I am concerned about the narrow roads and lack of sidewalks. 6/14/2018 7:25 PM 13 Me 6/14/2018 4:22 PM 14 We don't have safe bike paths from our neighborhood connecting us to anything west of France, which is most of Edina. 6/12/2018 11:54 AM 15 Most motorists don’t drive with bikes in mind 6/11/2018 6:04 PM 16 none 6/11/2018 2:09 PM 17 Lack of bike friendly roads to go further out of neighborhood towards galleria area and target 6/10/2018 6:45 PM 18 Lack of bike paths and sidewalks 6/10/2018 2:55 PM 19 weather 6/9/2018 2:18 PM 20 Lack of sidewalks.6/9/2018 9:45 AM 26 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 16.48%15 10.99%10 18.68%17 30.77%28 23.08%21 Q18 How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? Answered: 91 Skipped: 5 TOTAL 91 Very frequently... Frequently (2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 27 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 7.61%7 22.83%21 43.48%40 22.83%21 3.26%3 Q19 How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? Answered: 92 Skipped: 4 TOTAL 92 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 28 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 42.39%39 41.30%38 13.04%12 2.17%2 1.09%1 Q20 How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? Answered: 92 Skipped: 4 TOTAL 92 #ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ABOUT PARKING?DATE 1 Streets are wide enough to accommodate parking and travel. I don't like the newer, redone streets like Oaklawn, way too narrow. If anyone is parked on the street there isn't room to drive straight down it. Any large vehicle would definitely have issues. 8/5/2018 9:34 PM 2 Please continue to enforce NO overnight parking in the streets.7/29/2018 1:21 PM 3 I enjoy the fact that the streets are plowed- but the snow related parking restriction starts too early in the year- I think we could start in December 7/11/2018 9:07 AM 4 Please do not restrict parking on either side of street. Totally unnecessary. It would create a hardship for residents to not be able to park out front of their own homes. Also during holiday seasons, there would not be enough parking for all the neighbors 7/5/2018 3:19 PM 5 Parking is more than ample on our street (Drew), but parking on 58th West of France makes for a sketchy walk/bike/drive sometimes. 6/30/2018 1:19 PM 6 People should Park in their own drive way.6/29/2018 9:07 PM 7 For the most part it is fine. Occasionally, I have trouble getting out of my driveway if there are trucks and large cars parked on both sides of the street. 6/27/2018 6:37 PM Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 29 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 8 With quite a few one-car garage homes in the neighborhood, and construction ongoing, sometimes parking is quite congested. That said, the ban on overnight parking for residents from November- April can be difficult but we certainly understand it. 6/26/2018 11:07 AM 9 Parking is available but overnight parking is not allowed November - April. This makes things difficult for those of us with multiple cars and a one-care garage. 6/25/2018 3:37 PM 10 More of us could park in or near our garages off the alley but that is consistently a swamp with pot holes, excess water, mud, etc. 6/20/2018 6:13 PM 11 We are not allowed to park on the street from November until April-we have an alley which is not plowed promptly- therefore it is very difficult to get to work after a snowfall. 6/14/2018 10:32 PM 12 I'm worried about the new narrow streets. The wider streets provide space for cars and children and the new narrow streets are really hard to navigate with children. I'm anxious about safety because of the crowding and limited visibility with the new narrow streets. I see many near misses, frustrated drivers.... I don't know whose idea that was, but one of the reasons I preferred Edina over Mpls was because of the wider roads. I'm not sure why we are trying to make traffic and safety worse by narrowing roads. 6/12/2018 12:04 PM 13 With all of the new construction there are so many trucks up and down the road.6/10/2018 9:13 AM 14 Lots of single driveways in the neighborhood. Street parking is essential.6/9/2018 11:12 AM 30 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q21 Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Answered: 36 Skipped: 60 #RESPONSES DATE 1 58th is so narrow (and currently crumbling at the edges) it makes walking and biking difficult. As the only safe way to cross France Avenue we need to use it a lot but it never feels safe. 8/21/2018 10:29 AM 2 Many of the streets have bad spots due to the large construction vehicles in the area.8/5/2018 9:34 PM 3 We need a way to get standing water off of our street. We really need a safe way for families EAST of France to get to Pamela Park. Right now the only option is to cross France and to try and go west on 58th street. However, there are NO sidewalks and that is a very high traffic street. In the least there should not be street parking allowed on both sides of that street. Repainting and having just one side for parking would help make it feel safer until a legit sidewalk can be put in. You may suggest taking the sidewalk along France, but that is extremely dangerous with that fast moving traffic. 7/29/2018 1:21 PM 4 I would like curbs and sidewalks.7/29/2018 11:57 AM 5 Many potholes 7/18/2018 5:17 PM 6 street looks much worse than when I purchased 25+ years ago- needs repaving.7/11/2018 9:07 AM 7 58th Stret desperately needs a sidewalk, especially from France to Woodale. Lots of people walk and bike there and the visibility is very poor. Conditions are not safe for pedestrians. Cars veer away from people walking or biking, which in turn creates a risk for motorists. I would love for my son to walk or bike to South View midfle school but do not let him because of this. 7/9/2018 7:44 PM 8 Sidewalks please! We would GREATLY appreciate a sidewalk from Xerxes all the way to the schools, along 58th street - safe route to school - arterial street- connection to Chowen Park and Pamela Park, two different transit stops. Streets are truly in need of replacing. I know the city doesn't agree that construction trucks damage the streets in a more rapid fashion than normal wear and tear but please look at the street between 5829 Chowen and the house next to us on the north. 7/2/2018 10:16 AM 9 Many potholes. The road is in very rough shape for a paved road.7/1/2018 9:02 PM 10 I really appreciate the workers who come out and patch potholes. Seems like many potholes are from construction, not just weather. These guys get no rest. 6/27/2018 6:37 PM 11 Ewing Avenue is quite wide. There is plenty of width for parking and driving, although parking on both sides allows for only one through-lane. The street itself is in BAD shape. And perhaps most importantly, we get a TON of non-resident drivers cutting through between 60th and 58th, both directions. We are one block off France. We asked for and got a traffic study many years ago. Cars as fast as 45 mph were clocked on this street. A light at 60th and France would likely help. Sidewalks or a buffered walking/biking lane might help riders and walkers feel more safe. There are many kids living on this double-long block, ranging from babies through high school. Lots of young elementary aged kids...on bikes, striders, playing in driveways and front yards. 6/26/2018 11:07 AM 12 The streets in general are in poor condition. I understand winter weather is very hard on the roads, but the potholes,etc. are terrible and excessive. 6/25/2018 3:37 PM 13 Why aren't speed limit laws enforced????6/23/2018 3:11 PM 14 I think a 6 hour parking restriction is too restrictive, especially with the size of driveways and garages of existing houses. I am in favor of parking restrictions to ensure cars aren't left on streets for weeks, but 6 hours is unrealistic. 6/17/2018 5:17 PM 15 The roads are in terrible condition - many roads are plagued with potholes.6/17/2018 4:48 PM 16 The roadway is in definite need of repair 6/15/2018 7:54 PM 17 With some of the streets single side parking is all that should be available.6/15/2018 5:46 PM 31 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 18 The streets are in need of improvement but with continued construction in our area they would be damaged repeatedly. 6/14/2018 10:32 PM 19 the street is in very bad condition 6/14/2018 7:39 PM 20 See comment about lack of sidewalks.6/14/2018 7:26 PM 21 Streets have been in TERRIBLE condition and in disrepair for years.Our street (Abbott) has no curbs, so the repaving and addition of curbs, isn't happening soon enough for us. We have been waiting for years. New neighbors moving into the neighborhood, are SHOCKED by the condition of our streets!! 6/13/2018 8:08 PM 22 We need sidewalks!6/13/2018 6:26 PM 23 I'm frustrated by the narrow roads on France Avenue. Sidewalks on both sides of France that almost no one uses created terrible roads on France Ave that are narrow, difficult to navigate and overcrowded. I haven't been hit by a car yet on France, but almost daily there are cars that come into my lane and I have to brake to avoid an accident. With more buildings and apartments being built, why are we making the roads more difficult to drive? I've been frustrated seeing money spent in ways that make our ability to get to and from work and stores difficult. If no one walked on the sidewalks we already had for much of France Ave, why did we add sidewalks to the other side of the street and make driving (which already had an issue of heavy traffic) worse? 6/12/2018 12:04 PM 24 Need better street lighting. Streets are very dark at night.6/11/2018 7:30 PM 25 I don’t think every street needs sidewalks.6/11/2018 6:13 PM 26 I want sidewalks!6/11/2018 6:05 PM 27 very difficult to pull out of driveway with cars parked directly behind driveway - often workers 6/11/2018 2:14 PM 28 Don't narrow the street like Beard Ave south of 60th. It becomes a one-way street, and even forces bicyclists to stop to let cars by. I don't feel that we need a sidewalk. There isn't much foot traffic here. 6/11/2018 10:16 AM 29 Southeast corner on 60th and France has huge potholes making right turns difficult.6/10/2018 6:47 PM 30 There are lots of construction trucks in the area, I feel they are to blame for the poor torn up road conditions. This will likely continue after the roads are done 6/10/2018 3:12 PM 31 We need a marked crosswalk and ideally lights to alert vehicles that kids are crossing to Chowen Park. 57th and Chowen is a 4-way stop, yet 58th MUCH more traveled, and there is nothing. Most of the kids come from the south. 6/10/2018 2:57 PM 32 We would like sidewalks at least on 58th. The skirt of our driveway and road needs work - lack of gutter has led to erosion. 6/9/2018 3:25 PM 33 The numerous tear downs around our house frequently bring large heavy commercial trucks on the streets adding to the wear and tear on the streets. They also park on the streets often blocking our sidewalk and even our driveway. 6/9/2018 2:22 PM 34 The neighborhood has become much younger in the 4 yrs we’ve been here. Perhaps a few signs reminding drivers that there are pedestrians and kids around. 6/9/2018 2:12 PM 35 roads are terrible - high taxes, awful roads 6/9/2018 1:06 PM 36 intersection at 58th & Beard is too busy and people don't stop at stop sign, too fast 6/9/2018 11:17 AM 32 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 39.08%34 60.92%53 Q22 Do you favor improving the streetlights in your neighborhood (residential streetlights are funded by special assessment)? Answered: 87 Skipped: 9 TOTAL 87 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 I like the new "bulbs?" installed and think the amount of light is good. I don't think we need more streetlights, but I would like better looking (physical) poles. Currently many are old, split and leaning wooden poles that are not attractive. I would be willing to pay more for new poles. 8/21/2018 10:29 AM 2 The lighting is sufficient as is.7/2/2018 10:16 AM 3 Our house is well lit outside, but most on our street are not and there is only one street light in the middle of the street which is two blocks long. 6/30/2018 1:19 PM 4 Sure, energy efficient and adjustable lighting levels.6/29/2018 9:07 PM 5 Too much light pollution 6/29/2018 2:06 PM 6 I don't feel a strong need for better/more lighting. I would welcome more information on location, cost, and expected result. 6/27/2018 6:37 PM 7 We have one light mid-way between 58th and 60th. Adding an additional one or two midway between the existing ones would make a significant difference and improve visibility. 6/26/2018 11:07 AM 8 We live in the middle of the block, and it is pitch dark at night, and security is a concern.6/13/2018 8:08 PM 9 don't know enough about what the improvement would be 6/12/2018 2:53 PM 10 Not a concern 6/11/2018 3:48 PM 11 I'm generally happy with the amount of light 6/10/2018 7:37 AM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 33 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q23 Street Number Answered: 77 Skipped: 19 #RESPONSES DATE 1 5837 8/21/2018 10:29 AM 2 5829 8/17/2018 6:06 PM 3 5845 8/5/2018 9:35 PM 4 5900 8/5/2018 12:18 AM 5 5925 7/31/2018 5:22 PM 6 5800 7/29/2018 11:58 AM 7 5929 7/28/2018 6:05 PM 8 5924 7/25/2018 10:34 AM 9 5909 7/18/2018 5:18 PM 10 5809 7/11/2018 9:07 AM 11 5825 7/9/2018 7:45 PM 12 58th 7/9/2018 3:45 PM 13 5812 7/5/2018 3:20 PM 14 5829 7/2/2018 10:16 AM 15 5821 7/1/2018 9:02 PM 16 b/t 58th and 60th 6/30/2018 1:20 PM 17 5929 6/29/2018 2:06 PM 18 5921 6/27/2018 6:38 PM 19 5828 6/26/2018 11:07 AM 20 3400 6/25/2018 9:56 PM 21 58th 6/25/2018 3:37 PM 22 5841 6/23/2018 3:11 PM 23 5844 6/21/2018 2:07 PM 24 3212 6/20/2018 6:13 PM 25 5829 6/19/2018 11:49 AM 26 5829 6/19/2018 8:05 AM 27 5812 6/18/2018 3:19 PM 28 5900 6/17/2018 10:59 PM 29 5809 6/17/2018 4:48 PM 30 5925 6/15/2018 9:52 PM 31 5816 6/15/2018 7:54 PM 32 5933 6/15/2018 5:47 PM 33 5924 6/15/2018 9:21 AM 34 5832 6/14/2018 10:33 PM 35 59 6/14/2018 7:40 PM 34 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 36 5912 6/14/2018 4:23 PM 37 3112 6/14/2018 9:04 AM 38 5824 6/13/2018 8:09 PM 39 5804 6/13/2018 6:27 PM 40 5908 6/12/2018 10:43 PM 41 5901 6/12/2018 7:59 PM 42 5916 6/12/2018 7:03 PM 43 5904 6/12/2018 3:19 PM 44 5900 6/12/2018 2:56 PM 45 5809 6/12/2018 2:53 PM 46 5832 6/12/2018 12:04 PM 47 5917 6/12/2018 11:03 AM 48 5813 6/12/2018 10:40 AM 49 5812 6/12/2018 9:25 AM 50 5801 6/11/2018 8:11 PM 51 5845 6/11/2018 7:31 PM 52 5821 6/11/2018 7:00 PM 53 5832 6/11/2018 6:13 PM 54 5820 6/11/2018 6:05 PM 55 5836 6/11/2018 5:18 PM 56 5900 6/11/2018 3:48 PM 57 5821 6/11/2018 2:14 PM 58 5805 6/11/2018 1:51 PM 59 5817 6/11/2018 10:16 AM 60 5820 6/10/2018 9:01 PM 61 5812 6/10/2018 3:13 PM 62 5812 6/10/2018 3:02 PM 63 5801 6/10/2018 2:57 PM 64 5840 6/10/2018 1:11 PM 65 5929 6/10/2018 9:13 AM 66 5837 6/10/2018 8:51 AM 67 5932 6/10/2018 8:10 AM 68 5820 6/10/2018 7:37 AM 69 5836 6/9/2018 10:36 PM 70 5812 6/9/2018 6:27 PM 71 5800 6/9/2018 3:25 PM 72 3316 6/9/2018 2:23 PM 73 5833 6/9/2018 2:12 PM 74 5912 6/9/2018 1:09 PM 75 5812 6/9/2018 11:17 AM 76 5816 6/9/2018 11:12 AM 35 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 77 59th 6/9/2018 9:46 AM 36 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q24 Street name Answered: 91 Skipped: 5 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Chowen Av S 8/21/2018 10:29 AM 2 Beard Ave S 8/17/2018 6:06 PM 3 Zenith Ave So 8/5/2018 9:35 PM 4 Zenith Ave S 8/5/2018 12:18 AM 5 Zenith Ave S 7/31/2018 5:22 PM 6 Drew Ave S 7/29/2018 1:21 PM 7 Drew Ave S 7/29/2018 11:58 AM 8 Ewing 7/28/2018 6:05 PM 9 Drew 7/25/2018 10:34 AM 10 Zenith Ave S 7/18/2018 5:18 PM 11 ewing 7/11/2018 9:07 AM 12 Zenith Avenue S 7/9/2018 7:45 PM 13 beard ave 7/9/2018 3:45 PM 14 York Ave South 7/5/2018 3:20 PM 15 Beard Ave S 7/2/2018 1:56 PM 16 Chowen Avenue South 7/2/2018 10:16 AM 17 Chowen Ave S 7/1/2018 9:02 PM 18 Drew Ave 6/30/2018 1:20 PM 19 Abbott Ave South 6/29/2018 2:06 PM 20 Chowen 6/27/2018 6:38 PM 21 Ewing Avenue South 6/26/2018 11:07 AM 22 W 60th Street 6/25/2018 9:56 PM 23 Beard Avenue South 6/25/2018 6:02 PM 24 Drew Ave 6/25/2018 3:37 PM 25 Zenith Avenue South 6/23/2018 3:11 PM 26 York Ave So 6/21/2018 2:07 PM 27 W. 60th Street 6/20/2018 6:13 PM 28 Drew Ave S 6/19/2018 11:49 AM 29 Zenith Ave S 6/19/2018 8:05 AM 30 Ewing 6/18/2018 3:19 PM 31 Zenith Ave S 6/17/2018 10:59 PM 32 Beard Ave S 6/17/2018 5:18 PM 33 Zenith Ave S 6/17/2018 4:48 PM 34 Chowen 6/15/2018 9:52 PM 35 Chowen Avenue South 6/15/2018 7:54 PM 37 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 36 chowen ave so 6/15/2018 5:47 PM 37 60th Street 6/15/2018 3:01 PM 38 Ewing Av S 6/15/2018 10:50 AM 39 York Ave S 6/15/2018 9:21 AM 40 Zenith ave so 6/14/2018 10:33 PM 41 Ewing Ave 6/14/2018 7:40 PM 42 York Ave S 6/14/2018 7:26 PM 43 York 6/14/2018 7:20 PM 44 Xerxes 6/14/2018 4:23 PM 45 60th 6/14/2018 9:04 AM 46 Abbott Ave South 6/13/2018 8:09 PM 47 Zenith Ave 6/13/2018 6:27 PM 48 beard 6/12/2018 10:43 PM 49 Zenith 6/12/2018 7:59 PM 50 Drew Ave S 6/12/2018 7:03 PM 51 Beard Av S 6/12/2018 3:19 PM 52 York Ave S 6/12/2018 2:56 PM 53 Beard Av So 6/12/2018 2:53 PM 54 Drew 6/12/2018 12:04 PM 55 Beard Ave. So.6/12/2018 11:03 AM 56 Drew Ave So 6/12/2018 10:40 AM 57 Chowen Avenue 6/12/2018 9:25 AM 58 Ewing Ave S 6/11/2018 8:11 PM 59 York 6/11/2018 7:31 PM 60 Drew 6/11/2018 7:00 PM 61 Abbott Ave 6/11/2018 6:13 PM 62 Chowen 6/11/2018 6:05 PM 63 Zenith Ave 6/11/2018 5:52 PM 64 Beard 6/11/2018 5:18 PM 65 abbott ave so 6/11/2018 3:48 PM 66 Drew ave south 6/11/2018 3:29 PM 67 york ave s 6/11/2018 2:14 PM 68 Beard 6/11/2018 1:51 PM 69 xerxes ave 6/11/2018 12:17 PM 70 Beard Ave S 6/11/2018 10:16 AM 71 Beard 6/10/2018 9:01 PM 72 Beard 6/10/2018 6:47 PM 73 Drew Ave 6/10/2018 3:13 PM 74 Drew Ave 6/10/2018 3:02 PM 75 Chowen 6/10/2018 2:57 PM 76 Zenith 6/10/2018 1:11 PM 38 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 77 Zenith Ave S 6/10/2018 9:13 AM 78 Zenith Avenue South 6/10/2018 8:51 AM 79 Chowen Ave S 6/10/2018 8:10 AM 80 Zenith 6/10/2018 7:37 AM 81 Ewing Ave S 6/9/2018 10:36 PM 82 Abbott Ave S 6/9/2018 6:27 PM 83 Ewing 6/9/2018 3:25 PM 84 York 6/9/2018 3:02 PM 85 West 60th street 6/9/2018 2:23 PM 86 York Ave S 6/9/2018 2:12 PM 87 Beard Ave S 6/9/2018 1:09 PM 88 Abbott 6/9/2018 1:06 PM 89 Beard 6/9/2018 11:17 AM 90 Beard 6/9/2018 11:12 AM 91 Ewing Ave 6/9/2018 9:46 AM 39 / 39 Chowen Park A & B Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire APPENDIX K Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials 8/14/2018 1 The CITYof EDINA 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting August 13, 2018 The CITYof EDINAAgenda •Introductions •Why Reconstruct •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Project Scopes •Timeline •Communication •How to Prepare •Q&A www.EdinaMN.gov 2-C The CITYof EDINA2019 Projects •Chowen Park A & B –308 properties •Indian Trails B & C –93 properties •Indian Hills C –16 properties •Todd Park E –7 properties www.EdinaMN.gov 3-C The CITYof EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4-A Introductions Director of Assistant Engineering Transportation Engineering City Engineer Services Manager Planner Engineering Technicians Chad Ross Mark Tom Andrew DerekMillnerBintnerNolan Haataja Scipioni Northenscold Engineering GIS Water Resources Graduate Traffic SafetyCoordinator Administrator Coordinator Engineer Coordinator Liz Rebecca Jessica Charlie Nick Moore Foster Wilson Gerk Bauler Jon Drew Moore Torgerson The CITYof EDINA •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •- Extends pavement life •- Maximizes economics of scale •Prioritized based on; •- Pavement condition •-Age of original construction •- Underground utility issues www.EdinaMN.gov 5-A Why My Street? The CITYof EDINAWhy Reconstruct? •Originally constructed in 1910s-1990s (20-100 years old) •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, seal coat) www.EdinaMN.gov 6-A 8/14/2018 2 The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Roadways •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Most streets have curb and gutter •Many properties already have concrete driveway aprons www.EdinaMN.gov 7-A The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions -Alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 8-A •Concrete and gravel •Some areas have storm sewer •Concerns about required maintenance (snow plowing operations) The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Utilities •Watermain -Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains www.EdinaMN.gov 9-C •Sanitary Sewer -Inflow and infiltration - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. •Storm Sewer -Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing The CITYof EDINA •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences •Landscaping •Outwalks/steps Existing Conditions – Right-of-Way www.EdinaMN.gov 10-C The CITYof EDINAWhat/Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey www.EdinaMN.gov 11-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Roadways •Replacement of curb & gutter (partial or entire) •New roadbed and pavement surface www.EdinaMN.gov 12-A 8/14/2018 3 The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Plan •Approved by City Council in 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders •Incorporates; •- Minimum roadway design elements •- Sidewalk Facilities Plan •- Bicycle Facilities Plan •-Active Routes to School Plan www.EdinaMN.gov 13-C The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Classifications www.EdinaMN.gov 14-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced/installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy www.EdinaMN.gov 15-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Utilities •Localized watermain and service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •Localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Storm sewer upgrades www.EdinaMN.gov 16-A The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website www.EdinaMN.gov 17-A The CITYof EDINA •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Utility Ownership www.EdinaMN.gov 18-C Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service 8/14/2018 4 The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Sidewalks •Based on Sidewalk Facilities Map •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and construction conflicts www.EdinaMN.gov 20-A The CITYof EDINAPrivate Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance •Streetlight upgrades typically not included with project www.EdinaMN.gov 21-A The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Localized flooding during rainfall •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 22-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in yards •Construction equipment stored on streets •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) www.EdinaMN.gov 23-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 5 days to allow driveways to cure •Irrigation and pet fence systems most likely will be damaged www.EdinaMN.gov 24-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •-You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •- Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be seeded www.EdinaMN.gov 25-A 8/14/2018 5 The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •We will; •- Provide opportunities for input •- Keep you informed •- Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs www.EdinaMN.gov 26-A The CITYof EDINACity Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •- Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •- Sanitary sewer •-Watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 27-C The CITYof EDINAPedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •- Sidewalks •- Bike lanes •-Associated signage and pavement markings www.EdinaMN.gov 28-C The CITYof EDINADo Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •- Snowplowing •- Pothole repairs •- Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction www.EdinaMN.gov 29-C Source: Hennepin County website 8/2/2016 The CITYof EDINASpecial Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers 100% of roadway costs (20% on MSA roadways) •- Roadway and driveway removals •- Subgrade materials •-Asphalt pavement •- Restoration www.EdinaMN.gov 30-C The CITYof EDINAResidential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •- Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties www.EdinaMN.gov 31-C ScenarioScenarioScenarioScenario Land UseLand UseLand UseLand Use ClassClassClassClass REU FactorREU FactorREU FactorREU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 B Multi-Family Residential 0.8 8/14/2018 6 The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Chowen Park A&B •308 properties (268 REUs) •2.02 miles of road •Full replacement/installation of curb & gutter •Full replacement of watermain, water services •5’ sidewalk on Beard Avenue www.EdinaMN.gov 32-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Chowen Park A&B •0.42 miles of gravel alleys •New asphalt pavement on existing gravel alleys •0.53 miles of concrete alleys •Repairs may be performed on existing concrete alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 33-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Indian Trails B&C •93 properties (88.01 REUs) •1.1 miles of road •Spot replacement of curb & gutter •- New curb & gutter on Shawnee Circle/ Overholt Pass •Spot replacement of watermain, water services •Possible repair/replacement of retaining walls on Shawnee Circle/Overholt Pass www.EdinaMN.gov 34-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Indian Hills C •16 properties (13.5 REUs) •0.15 miles of road •Spot replacement of curb & gutter www.EdinaMN.gov 35-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details –Todd Park E •7 properties (5.5 REUs) •0.11 miles of road •Installation of new curb & gutter •Spot replacement of watermain, water services •Improvements to storm sewer system www.EdinaMN.gov 36-A The CITYof EDINAPreliminary Assessments *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) www.EdinaMN.gov 37-C 8/14/2018 7 The CITYof EDINATypical Project Timeline www.EdinaMN.gov 41-C 8/14/2018 8 The CITYof EDINACity Extra •Free, weekly email updates on project progress and schedules •Best way to stay informed •www.EdinaMN.gov/CityExtra •- Check box next to your project name •If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates upon request www.EdinaMN.gov 47-A The CITYof EDINAHow To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Sign up for City Extra •Ask questions, stay informed www.EdinaMN.gov 48-C The CITYof EDINA Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Contact Us www.EdinaMN.gov 49-A Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449 LMoore@edinamn.gov Andrew Scipioni Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 AScipioni@edinamn.gov The CITYof EDINAQuestions? www.EdinaMN.gov 50-A Thanks for your time! 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 1G ' 2 ge: .,-7-- olv,,,r-A , 3 o ty, , 4 .74' 6 7 „_1:(-( (7/ r CL / ( 8 T75)(D 17/77( 7: 9 "•-ifiZt.:t.5 "75-",)i -i 10 11 4.vr rE ?. 12 i 13 7,< 14 o!o- fr c 15 1:3v 0 16 UO 18 c- _ 19 - 20 ikA g yy 21 22 23 ,, ' 24 , 25 r- c LD- Z.-NAL. 26 27 r& 6 fix re v\ SEWS /11\9011 Ave. c • 28 /). /3-T7 clui G> 76)5) c 29 30 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME i ADDRESS 1 (2/), /4411-, _ ),4C )10,5 2 Com'` I Si --- - 3 MARK- 10,41)04 S-8 t 3 -D124.3n) Ave S'i,„ 4 AL) ei-) 5 i 6 L t_ /2 d__ 7 ":5(/ .I_) zilf Fie ,5-61/}1 /X Sc. 8 L.) ---,-- cl. (--( ._ 0-t u‘e , ,,,„_, 9 -FL,-SA Z E 4ckf i 10 t r - )T0. 11 i i & - LC, 12 56Wo ..(Aril"? Al J`e ) 4' 13 r ? e-). 1//// z-.. ts 14 15 09,") c- 4,0,v ccic„, 16 (9 , So/ \ I 17 , :,-'..)o EA 0 cv 5 - g 2 tt •cics,15 la- Jr& • S 18 -t 2 z.. 19 & 7(-1?(E)---Lta_f _i___ - Cil-t_ 0-t- 20 p, livi, 'U._ ( &(i Pa 21 2 / L- err 2 * ( ef t 1,/ (267 22 23 / 24 -----, .,6 ; i Ve. e 4,- y 4; .' r 25 . ii 0 7 7 ilt,--(-;, 26 -Te (-vz--1-- -C812/ 1 ilac.AJ cati Ar S 27 28 29 30 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 / 4 ( A ,a--(/ s C 2 1 G t / 4 - (-) S 3 `Th`t 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 APPENDIX L Correspondence from Residents From:Robert Stewart To:Chad Millner Subject:Fw: Road Re-Construction 2019 Date:Thursday, October 25, 2018 11:43:36 AM Attachments:City Council Letter.docx Chad, I assume you or someone in Engineering is connecting with Ms. Meerwald. Is that right? Thank you. - Bob Stewart From: lois meerwald Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 8:46 PM To: City Council Subject: Road Re-Construction 2019 See attached letter. Dear Edina City Council Members: I have lived on Beard Ave for over 30 years. Two years ago I attended a meeting about proposed roadway reconstruction of my street. The reconstruction did not occur but is now scheduled for 2019, subject to funding approval by the Council. In the original reconstruction plan, there were no sidewalks for my block, 5900. In the plan presented in August, I was surprised to find out there are sidewalks. I asked the city engineer to explain and he informed me that you had approved sidewalks as part of the Pedestrian Facilities map earlier this year; he thought in Feb. I am disappointed in your actions for a number of reasons. First, I think you should have asked us, the residents, if we wanted a sidewalk rather than just making the decision. Second, given that it was a change from the previous roadway reconstruction plan, you should have told us in the letter sent to impacted residents. Some residents didn’t attend the recent meeting because they had attended before. How do you think they would find out about this? I have looked on the city website and can see you have done some research on what residents want with respect to sidewalks and bike lanes and bike paths. From what I can see, it was a small number of responses. Regardless of the responses, you never asked what I believe is the most important question, do you want a sidewalk on your street? Like many issues, people support them until it directly impacts them. I understand from the city engineer the rational was to connect a larger part of the Chowen Park neighborhood to the sidewalk south of 60th street, in addition to future sidewalks on 58th and 60th streets. I can see 58th is scheduled for reconstruction in 2020 but 60th and the rest of Chowen Park are not scheduled for reconstruction within the next five years. With traffic lights at 58th and France and 60th and Xerxes and the bus stops at those intersections, I understand why a sidewalk is desirable on 58th and 60th. It is much harder to understand why a sidewalk is needed on Beard. The engineer explained that Beard was an “ideal location” for a sidewalk because it is halfway between France and Xerxes and it could provide a “future connection across Minnehaha Creek”. I don’t understand how Beard being halfway between France and Xerxes makes any difference. Do you think people who live between France and Xerxes will come over to Beard to walk or bike because there is a sidewalk? Did you consider the park on Chowen and 57th and that a sidewalk leading to the park might be desirable? And what future connection across the creek are you talking about? Are you unaware of the bridge which currently crosses the creek? I also understand that with the addition of the sidewalk, parking will only be permitted on one side of the street and the street will be narrower. These two things will make it more difficult for some residents to back out of their driveway if a car is parked behind their driveway. From experience I can tell you it is already difficult with the street at its current width. My neighbors across the street have an ally and often park on the street rather than in their garage. You must do a better job of informing residents of changes that have a direct impact on them. If you told us about the sidewalk and the narrower street, how was that communicated? It should not be after you have voted on it. It must be before so there can be discussion. As a result of your actions, I can’t just tell you at public meeting that I don’t want a sidewalk. Instead, I have to submit a petition opposing the sidewalk. I understand you do not require a certain number of signatures. This makes me wonder how will you decide to proceed with the sidewalk or not. What criteria will you use? From looking at the city website, I think the only public opportunity to “discuss” this will be at the meeting when you vote. Of course, citizens can send you letters like this one but how can they do that if they don’t know about the sidewalk? Will there be an opportunity for discussion/input from your constituents? Whatever the outcome I hope/expect you to do better for other residents in the future. For example, because I am on NextDoor, you as asking for input on lawn restoration after road reconstruction. Nothing wrong with that but did it occur to you to solicit input directly from those of us who will be dealing with this next year or from those residents who have had sod or spray used over the last few years? Sincerely, Lois A. Meerwald 5908 Beard Ave. S. Dear Neighbors, As you know, our street is scheduled for reconstruction next year, assuming the City Council approves the city portion of the funding. The current project includes a sidewalk, as a result of a change to the Pedestrian Facilities Map made by the Council earlier this year. I believe the addition of the sidewalk will make the street narrower. One side of the street will have the sidewalk and parking. There will be no parking on the side without the sidewalk. The city has not yet decided which side of the street will have the sidewalk. The city will not clear the snow from the sidewalk nor take care of the grass between the sidewalk and the street. That will be the responsibility of the homeowners. I do not want and a sidewalk and will be submitting a petition to the Council opposing it. If you are interested in signing the petition, let me know at and we can arrange a time for me to come by and get your signature. I plan to submit the petition by the end of October. Lois Meerwald 5908 Beard Ave. 1 Liz Moore From:Andrew Scipioni Sent:Monday, August 20, 2018 4:32 PM To:'lois meerwald' Subject:RE: RE: Chowen Park Roadway Reconstruction Lois, There are a few factors that help determine whether a sidewalk is maintained by the City or by the adjacent property owners. The majority of the sidewalks that are maintained by the City are located along either county roads or Municipal State Aid streets. MSA streets are generally higher‐traffic roads that the City has designated as part of a regional transportation network, which connect to other Cities’ MSA streets, county roads, and/or state highways. For example, in your neighborhood, sidewalks on France and Xerxes Avenues are maintained by the City as they are county roads. Future facilities on W 60th Street and W 58th Street would also be maintained by the City because both of these streets are designated as MSA. Additional sidewalks not located on county roads or MSA streets may be maintained by the City because they are in close proximity to schools or parks. For example, the sidewalk on Beard Avenue south of W 60th Street is currently maintained by the City as it connects to Strachauer Park, as well as the adjacent sidewalks on W 62nd Street, Beard Place, and W 64th Street. I’d have to check with our Public Works Department, but I would suspect that the proposed sidewalk on Beard Avenue between W 60th Street and W 58th Street would not be maintained by the City. If a sidewalk is not currently maintained by the City, residents can also use the petition form I sent you to request that the City maintain it. Again, it would be up to City Council to direct Public Works whether or not to include the sidewalk in their maintenance plan. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: lois meerwald [mailto ] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 9:31 PM To: Andrew Scipioni Subject: Re: RE: Chowen Park Roadway Reconstruction Thanks for your response. Maybe this is a question for another department but do you know who is responsible for clearing the snow from the sidewalk? Some think it is the homeowner and others say it is the city. Would you forward to the right dept if this isn't your area. Thank you. Lois On Wednesday, August 15, 2018, 12:54:30 PM CDT, Andrew Scipioni wrote: Lois, 2 You are correct that the previous Sidewalk Facilities map (updated November 2014) did not show a proposed sidewalk on Beard Avenue north of W 60th Street. This past year, through the process of updating the City’s Comprehensive Plan, this map was reexamined and it was suggested to extend this pedestrian facility north all the way to W 54th Street. The rationale was to connect a larger portion of the Chowen Park neighborhood to the new sidewalk on Beard Avenue south of W 60th Street, in addition to future pedestrian facilities on W 58th Street and W 60th Street. Beard Avenue also presented itself as an ideal location for a pedestrian facility as it is halfway between France Avenue and Xerxes Avenue, and is one of the few streets that could provide a future connection across Minnehaha Creek. The new Pedestrian Facilities map was approved by the City Council earlier this year (in February, I believe). Because this plan has been approved by Council, staff will proceed with recommending that it be constructed as part of the Chowen Park A/B Roadway Reconstruction project. We are still in the process of determining which side of the street the sidewalk would be constructed on; this decision will be based on impacts within the right-of-way (utility poles, steep topography, etc.), cost of construction, and connections to existing facilities in the area. The entire roadway reconstruction project will be considered by Council at a public hearing in December (the exact date has not yet been determined, but all affected properties will be notified of this hearing). Between now and then, residents are welcome to share their thoughts and suggestions on which side they would prefer to see the sidewalk constructed. If residents are opposed to this sidewalk being constructed, their best option would be to submit a petition to Council; https://www.edinamn.gov/367/Petition. There is no minimum number of signatures required, and it will ultimately be up to Council to make a decision on the proposed improvement. If you have additional questions or comments, please let me know. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Meerwald, Lois A [mailto Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 9:51 AM To: Andrew Scipioni; Chad Millner Cc: Subject: Chowen Park Roadway Reconstruction I have attended the previous meetings on this project. In those meetings, there was no sidewalk planned for Beard and now there is. Can you tell me when that changed and why? Was there a petition for a sidewalk? Is this a final decision or is there an opportunity for discussion? Thank you. Lois A. Meerwald 5908 Beard Ave S. From: To:Aaron Ditzler Cc: Subject:Re: 2019 Chowen Park Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Date:Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:38:36 PM Attachments:image001.gifimage001.gif Thanks, Aaron. Barb and Tran Alfrey On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 4:27 PM Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@edinamn.gov> wrote: Barb, As we discussed on the phone, please contact us once construction begins to discuss optionsfor replacing the large silver maple that must be removed due to street reconstruction. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From:Andrew Scipioni To: Subject:RE: RE: 5933 Abbott Alley Date:Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:07:05 AM Attachments:image001.gif Debra, I just wanted to follow up on your concerns about the condition of the alley between now and next year’s reconstruction. I’m not sure if you’ve had any further conversations with Shawn Anderson or Dave Goergen in Public Works, but Shawn has assured me that his crews will perform minor corrections in the fall to ensure the surface is adequate for the snowplows. However, they are not able to make long-term changes to the drainage patterns; this would have to be done as part of the reconstruction project. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Andrew Scipioni Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 10:56 AMTo: ''Cc: Shawn Anderson; David GoergenSubject: RE: 5933 Abbott Alley Debra, Thank you for sending these photos. I will add them to our project files, along with these emails so there is a record of our conversation. I’ve copied Shawn Anderson, our Public Works Street Supervisor, who can evaluate the conditions in this alley and determine the potential scope of work needed to address your drainage concerns between now and next summer. Because you mentioned previous conversations with the City with no follow-up, I’ve also copied Dave Goergen, our Public Works Coordinator, so he is aware of the situation. Long term, as I mentioned, the Chowen Park A/B neighborhood is proposed to be reconstructed in 2019. As part of this project, Engineering staff is proposing to pave the gravel alleys to reduce future maintenance requirements. In addition to simply placing asphalt on the existing gravel section, we will attempt to improve drainage conditions where feasible within the scope of the project. If you have any other questions, comments, or concerns about the proposed reconstruction project, feel free to contact me via email or phone. Thanks, Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Debra Olson [mailto ] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 10:23 AMTo: Andrew ScipioniSubject: 5933 Abbott AlleyHello Andrew. Here are the pictures that we spoke about earlier this morning. Thank you. From:Aaron Ditzler To: Cc:Andrew Scipioni Subject:RE: 5845 Beard Ave S Date:Wednesday, October 3, 2018 5:31:37 PM Attachments:image001.gif Kim, John called me to discuss your large silver maple tree. I told him that, unfortunately, the tree will need to be removed to facilitate the proposed 2019 improvements. We also discussed the following things. John indicated that one larger replacement tree would likely be preferred over two smaller trees. A final decision is not necessary until construction begins. A sidewalk is proposed along Beard Ave. The timing of street reconstruction along Beard Ave and 59th Ave will be determined by the contractor. It could be late April or later in the summer. We will notify residents in advance of street reconstruction beginning along their street. Please contact me after construction begins and we can discuss transplanting an estimated 8-inch tree in the City right of way. Or two smaller trees if that is preferred. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Aaron Ditzler Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 3:29 PM To: Subject: RE: 5845 Beard Ave S Kim, Can you and / or your husband call me at your convenience to discuss your large silver maple tree? Thank you, Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Andrew Scipioni Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 1:02 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: FW: 5845 Beard Ave S Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: K Douce Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2018 12:46 PMTo: Andrew ScipioniSubject: 5845 Beard Ave SHi Andrew, This is Kim Doucette. You stopped by my house on Monday to discuss the tree in front of our house on the corner of Beard and 59th. I had a discussion with my husband about ourconversation, and we have decided we absolutely do not want to lose that tree next summer. We would really appreciate it if your planning department can come up with a solution and thetree stays. It is a very big and old tree and we love the aesthetic, as well as the shade it provides in the summer. The removal of the tree would greatly affect our property, and even areplacement tree will not come close in providing us the same as the current one. Thank you for your consideration.Sincerely, Kim Doucette From:Andrew Scipioni To: Subject:RE: 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Date:Friday, August 24, 2018 12:19:18 PM Attachments:image001.gif Crystal, Assuming City Council approves the project at the public hearing this December, the estimated assessment amount would be recorded with the City as a pending assessment on the property, but is not yet payable. One year after construction, our department evaluates the final construction costs and calculates the final assessment amount, which would be presented at the final assessment hearing in October 2020. After Council approves the final assessment, then it becomes payable. Between October and November of 2020, homeowners can pay the full amount or a partial amount (25% minimum). Whatever amount is not paid before the end of November rolls onto the property tax statement for the next 15 years. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Crystal Wiegel [mailto: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 9:51 AMTo: Andrew ScipioniCc: Crystal WiegelSubject: Fw: 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Andrew- When is this amount due if we pay in full? From: Andrew Scipioni Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2018 2:35 PM To: Wiegel, Crystal Subject: RE: 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Sent by an external sender Crystal, The way our assessment policy is current worded, all properties adjacent to the gravel alleys would be assessed, not just those that currently access them. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Wiegel, Crystal [mailto Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 3:22 PMTo: Andrew ScipioniCc: Will Wiegel; 'chalweg'Subject: RE: 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Thanks, Andrew! Do you know if all homes with Gravel alleys will be assessed the alley charges or just those with alley access? We have an newer home that doesn’t have alley access. Thank you! From: Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 1:46 PM To: Wiegel, Crystal Subject: RE: 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Sent by an external sender Crystal, Attached is the presentation shown at the meeting last night. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments about the proposed project. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Wiegel, Crystal [mailto:] Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 7:01 AMTo: Andrew ScipioniCc: Crystal Wiegel; Will WiegelSubject: 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Good Morning! Tonight (8/13) there is a mtg related to the 2019 Neighborhood Roadway reconstruction. I am unable to attend, but interested to get the information presented. Please confirm your receipt. Thank you! Crystal Wiegel | From: To:Carter Schulze Subject:Re: 2019 Street/Alley Reconstruction Project Date:Thursday, July 5, 2018 11:51:34 AM Thanks for the call back Carter. I know myself and others on the alley are excited to have this update to the "country road" that leads to our garages. I just wanted to provide some feed backand check to see that the drainage was going to be addressed. I listened to your message and was able to understand your plan, thanks again for getting back to me. Raleigh Raleigh On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Raleigh Haugen <> wrote:Hello Carter, I just called about the alley work next year. Do you have a grading plan for the gravel alley between York and Xerxes? I wanted to provide feedback to insure that water runs down thealley to the storm sewer and not onto the driveways off the alley. It freezes and cause fall hazards. Can you let me know if a plan to deal with run off water is designed into the alleyproject? Thanks, Raleigh Haugen 5920 Xerxes AveEdina, MN 55410 From:Carter Schulze To: Subject:RE: Alley Paving Project Date:Thursday, June 14, 2018 11:44:41 AM Attachments:image001.gif image003.png Yes. It is on Tuesday July 31st. You should be receiving a letter invite a few weeks from this meeting. Thanks Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Mary Kiley [mailto:] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 8:59 AM To: Carter Schulze Subject: Alley Paving Project Has the July meeting on the 2019 Alley Paving project that includes the alley behind the home I own at 3308 West 60th Street been set? Mary Kiley On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:48 AM, Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: We should be holding an informational meeting this in July this summer. Then the public hearing would be in Nov/Dec timeframe. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Mary Kiley [mailto: Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2018 10:33 AM To: Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Re: 3308 West 60th Street Thank you. Do you have any idea of when the public meetings on this will be held? Mary Kiley On Feb 8, 2018, at 10:24 AM, Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Mary, As we have discussed previously, we intend to reconstruct the streets and the alleys in this neighborhood in 2019. As Charlie pointed out below, the engineering study phase of this project will begin this summer. One of the tasks of that study will be to analyze the drainage of the alleys in relation to the street drainage and the existing drainage system. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Charles Gerk Sent: Monday, February 05, 2018 2:04 PM To: ' Cc: Cindy Larson <CLarson@EdinaMN.gov>; Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 3308 West 60th Street Mary, I apologize for my lack of response.In regards to our November conversation, the site does appear tohave some more fill in areas it shouldn’t, but that isn’t veryuncommon during construction and resolves itself during finalgrade. Final grade per their approved storm water management plan willinclude a swale on the east and west side of the lot (although theirgrade will be higher than yours), with drain tile and catch basins in the rear yard that connect to the storm sewer off 60th and Abbott Ave. Prior to their $10,000 escrow being released and receiving their final certificate of occupancy, I conduct a final grade inspection. During this inspection I verify that the proposed stormwater management plan has been built per plan and that there is not damage to the public infrastructure. I did have a brief conversation in December with LDK about allowing you to connect to the drain tile they are installing, they seemed opposed the idea, but didn’t have a final landscaping plan yet. I do believe there is enough grade from your rear yard to the catch basin at 60th and Abbott to provide drainage to you if desired. Please let me know if you have any additions comments or concerns about the neighboring construction. I will have Carter reach out to you about the 2019 Alley Paving project, I do know that the design and construction team is just about finished with the 2018 plans and will likely be moving on to the 2019 projects in the next 4-6 weeks. Charles Gerk, PE, Graduate Engineer 952-826-0321 | Fax 952-826-0392cgerk@edinamn.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From:Carter Schulze To: Subject:Chowen Park Neighborhood Date:Wednesday, May 23, 2018 3:00:17 PM Attachments:image001.gif Courtney, The engineering department is currently working on a big picture flooding solution for yourneighborhood and specifically the low area behind your home. This back-yard area as wellas the road elevation along Chowen Ave and how the future storm sewer network functionsis one of our top priorities for next year’s neighborhood project. I would be very interestedin meeting with you in person at your house to discuss the challenges with this project. Today I met with your neighbor to the south and then started writing a letter to all of theneighbors around this area. I realized you lived in this area and so I wanted to first reachout to you as well.I appreciate you getting back to me. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From:Carter Schulze To: Subject:RE: 58th-60th Chowen Ave So Date:Monday, May 21, 2018 12:25:48 PM Attachments:image001.gif This Wed at 1030 at your house works. I will bring a few others as well just to get a look at the situation. Thanks Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Anne-Michelle & Tom Bakritzes [mailto: Sent: Monday, May 21, 2018 11:05 AM To: Carter Schulze Subject: Re: 58th-60th Chowen Ave So Hi Carter, Please accept my apologies, but I missed your response and only now saw your reply today. I am available this Wednesday morning 10:30 0r 11am if you would like to meet at our house? Thanks, Tom Bakritzes On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:53 AM, Carter Schulze <CSchulze@edinamn.gov> wrote: Mr. Bakritzes, The engineering department is currently working on a big picture flooding solution for this neighborhood and this area to be incorporated in the 2019 reconstruction project. This back yard area as well as the road elevation along Chowen Ave and how the future storm sewer network funcitons is one of our top priorities for this neighborhood project. I would be very interested in meeting with you in person at your house to discuss the challenges you mention in your email. Let me know a time that works for you to meet. Thank you. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Bakritzes Family <> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 4:45 PM To: Derek Northenscold <DNorthenscold@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 58th-60th Chowen Ave So Hi Derek, I’m reaching out to you today to ask about next year’s road project for Chowen Ave So. between 58th and 60th. I live at 5833 Chowen Ave So and a few years ago we filled out a survey about flooding issues we have experience while living at our home. I have not heard anything more about the survey or our specific response. I’m concerned about about the upcoming construction project and that our driveway slopes directly into our garage and our basement and that we have experience issues with heavy rains in the past. We have a dry-drain in the driveway, but it cannot handle huge rain amounts quick enough. What will Edina be doing to address homesteads that are affected by neighboring slopes and options to connect driveway drains to the city sewer during the road construction. Ultimately, I would like to know the City of Edina plans to prevent flooding to my home and driveway. Thanks in advance, A. (Tom) Bakritzes 5833 Chowen Ave So Edina, MN 55410 From: To:Carter Schulze Subject:RE: Chowen Park A and B Roadway Reconstruction 2019 THANK YOU Date:Monday, March 19, 2018 5:44:54 PM Attachments:image001.gif Carter, Thank you for your response – I am looking forward to having the alley work done – would be great to have a paved alley. I appreciate you taking the time to respond. Have a good week! Lori McGowan From: Carter Schulze [mailto:CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov] Sent: Monday, March 19, 2018 8:43 AMTo: 'Lori McGowan'Subject: RE: Chowen Park A and B Roadway Reconstruction 2019 Lori, At this time, we are planning to reconstruct all of the alley’s in these two neighborhoods. If that plan moves forward, your property would be assessed for the alley work and that is it. Any Xerxes work would be the County’s decision on assessments. I don’t know of any County assessed roads, but they could change their policy. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Lori McGowan [mailto ] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2018 2:37 PM To: Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: Chowen Park A and B Roadway Reconstruction 2019 Mr. Schulze, I live at 5904 Xerxes Ave. So., Edina. I was just going through some paperwork and came across your September 15, 2017 letter that was sent out to Edina residents regarding Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction in the Chowen Park A and B area slated for 2019. I do have a question for you about the way Edina typically assesses residents for these projects. I live on Xerxes Ave., which is a county highway and I have never been assessed for improvements made on Xerxes. My question is, will Edina take the project cost to be assessed to residents in Chowen Park A and B and divide it equally between all residents who reside in that “area”, even those who like me are on a street that is not part of the project? Also, is a resident assessed by the size of their property? Just wondered how that typically is handled in Edina. Thank you for taking the time to respond to this. I appreciate it. Lori McGowan 1 Liz Moore From:Mary Kiley Sent:Tuesday, October 3, 2017 9:31 AM To:Carter Schulze Subject:Alley Water Issues - 3308 West 60th These are the pictures of water coming off the alley at my house last night. Mary Kiley From:Andrew Scipioni To: Subject:RE: Chowen Park A/B reconstruction meeting Date:Tuesday, September 26, 2017 5:06:08 PM Attachments:20170925 Open House Mtg_2019&20 Projects.pdf Sidewalk_Facilities_CompPlan_Asbuilts.pdf Bicycle_Facilities_Comprehensive.pdf image001.gif Tom, Thank you for attending last night’s meeting. Here is the link to Hennepin County’s Interactive Property Map; https://gis.hennepin.us/property/map/default.aspx I’ve also attached a copy of the presentation given last night. We don’t have much information on the proposed W 58th St project, other than that this roadway is recommended for pedestrian and bicycle facilities (see attached maps). This could mean separate on-street bike lanes and a boulevard-style sidewalk (similar to what exists on Tracy Avenue or W 70th St), or it could mean a mixed-use bituminous trail for pedestrians and bicyclists. The types of facilities proposed and which side of the street facilities would go on won’t be determined until the summer prior to reconstruction (in this case, summer of 2019). Since you are on Beard Ave, I should mention that staff is, at this time, considering extending the sidewalk that was installed last year between Strachauer Park and W 60th St up to W 58th St as part of the Chowen Park A/B project in 2019. There is a possibility that alley improvements will be included with the Chowen Park A/B reconstruction project. That determination will be made based on comments from our Public Works Department as well as comments from residents along these alleys. Alley improvements would be an additional assessment levied against only the properties that abut the alleys. If you are still experiencing problems with your City Extra account, I’d suggest contacting our Communications and Technology Services Department (952-826-0359). Let me know if you have any additional questions. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: Tom [mailto ] Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 3:26 PMTo: Andrew ScipioniSubject: Chowen Park A/B reconstruction meeting Andrew, I attended the Chowen Park meeting last night (9/25). You mentioned we could contact you for further information. I would like the URL for the county right-of-way map. Please also send the PDF of last night’s presentation. The 58th street (Wooddale to Xerxes) project was also mentioned. Do you have any information on this? Are alleys included in the Chowen A project? (I live on Beard Avenue and share an alley with Abbott.) You can email me at The first address is my original City Extra account, which is experiencing problems. I created a new account today using the gmail account. Thanks for your time, Tom Love 5817 Beard Ave S. From:Chad Millner To:; Carter Schulze Cc:Travis Gossard; Shawn Anderson; Andrew Scipioni Subject:RE: Pictures of street and alley Date:Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:41:33 AM Attachments:image001.gif Kendall, Thanks for the note. Yes, it is still on our to do list. We are focusing on our big street and sidewalk projects first then we are going to review the drainage in front of the sidewalk. We have another area over there we are also going to survey to determine if it’s an easy fix or something that has to wait until street reconstruction occurs. We will be in touch during May with our findings. Thanks, Chad Chad Millner, Director of Engineering 952-826-0318 | Fax 952-826-0392cmillner@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kendall Brant [mailto: Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 7:22 AMTo: Carter SchulzeCc: Travis Gossard; Shawn Anderson; Andrew Scipioni; Chad MillnerSubject: Re: Pictures of street and alley Gentlemen: I kindly received a telephone call from your department in February advising a surveyorwould visit our property for an assessment; can you advise the outcome of his/her visit? Best Regards, Kendall Brant5905 Abbott Ave S On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Kendall Brant wrote:Mr. Schulze and others: Thanks for the quick response. My wife (her van in attached photo) would welcome anytemporary measure that would at a minimum allow access to our sidewalk by somehowdiverting the ponding water. In years past I have put crushed rock and even a small bridgeover the water- but the street cleaner or snow plow pushed it into the yard. Regards, Kendall Brant5905 Abbott Ave S On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Carter Schulze <CSchulze@edinamn.gov> wrote: Mr. Brant, I will discuss these topics with our engineering department as well as public works and get back to you. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | www.EdinaMN.gov ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kendall Brant [mailto Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 4:27 PMTo: Travis Gossard; Carter SchulzeSubject: Fwd: Pictures of street and alley Mr. Gossard and Mr. Schulze: Living on Abbott Ave S has been painful for the past 12 years and the deteriorating conditionshave made it untenable. FRONT: we have a large body of water blocking our front yardsidewalk; BACK: a mud bog dirt alley has made our drive way a slurry covered mess. Both conditions present a hazardous condition for us to have to confront; however, currentlywe prefer wading thru the water in front to the mud in back. But unfortunately the police areticketing cars parked overnight east of France (our friends on Maple and 49th advisethey park overnight on the street year round without tickets except during snow emergency- isthis correct?). So we need help. #1 could you have some blacktop poured in front of our house to allow us to access oursidewalk. And advise who in the city I should contact to discuss a temporary variance onstreet parking (except during snow emergency). #2 could you investigate re-grading or other action to mitigate the mud pushed into our alleyaccess drive-way. I understand the Chowen Park A and B Roadway Reconstruction is due to begin in 2019;however, my family cannot tolerate these conditions for 3 more years and any help would begreatly appreciated. Best Regards, Kendall Brant5905 Abbott Ave S APPENDIX M Gravel Alley Petition The City Council City f Edina Petition Instructions This petition form is to be used to ask the Edina City Council to consider the following types of improvements: SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING WATER MAIN STORM SEWER PERMANENT STREET SU FACING WITH CU AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY (WITHOUT PERMANENT STREET SURFACING) SANITARY SEWER STREET LIGHTING or another improvement you describe (called OTHER on this form). You may use another petition forth if you wish but the city council may reject such petitions unless they contain the following information: I. Type of improvement(s) requested, e.g., SIDEWALK, STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, ETC. 2. Precise locations(s) of the requested improvements. 3. A statement that all who sign the petition understand that the city council may assess the costs of these improvements against the properties benefiting from the improvements in amounts determined by the Connell. 4. Printed name of property owner, owner's signature and phone number, and property address. 5. Signature of person circulating the petition. If you have questions, please call the City Clerk at 952-927-8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. DEBRA MANGEN CITY CLERK APRIL 2008 IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE 13108 W 60th St 3112 W 60th St OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) Brian Haab/Jennine McDonough Taylor Olstad PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 5905 York Ave S 5909 York Ave S Marilyn Cavara Chriostopher Weigle This petit' ai n citit i ated by: s---v_st4 4064e_c Ares Brca14E -302g koL11- 51- ADDRESS 61"?SPHONE City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX e (612) 927-5461 T41rD DATE RECEIVED: PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL El SIDEWALK STORM SEWER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY Ei ALLEY PAVING SANITARY SEWER PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER WATER MAIN STREET LIGHTING OTHER: To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. Xreir\(_ec Ate_ between LOCATION OF IMPR VEMENT BY STREET NAME e between LO R v ION F II ( V . I 2 PIrkVEIVLEN5BT 14 _STREET NAME between LOCATION WF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between -C-9 (90 ADDRESS 01 ADDRESS 3100 SS and and and S-93?Th DDRESS 3 3 ADDPU,SS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS There is space for more signatures on the back. APRIL 2008 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE 13100 W 60th St 5932 Xerxes Ave S Rental home Rental home atkir-ak pc_100,e,44:y Tracy Alger 13104 W 60th St 15913 York Ave S 5917,York Ave S [5929 York Ave S Katherine Hancock 5904! Xerxes Ave S Lori McGowan (9-7.,' Yi1C 16"74,--e--, ,,----, A#2.a.,;4„. blIz,L-7--"L_ALc A A,/ W.14&.0roiv,„----Ai- 5906 Xerxes Ave S Don/Jean Harlicker 5912 Xerxes Ave S Rick/Gail Jones 5910 Xerxes Ave S Christel Hutchinson 10.11:7401/ 592,0 Xerxes Ave S Raleigh Haugen ----,, i 59214 Xerxes Ave S Tom/Patti Hines 4 5928 Xerxes Ave S Clint/Lynn Reynolds ___-,..- ,,-_-- _--__ Rtese ca4 tto -they dod--i- Oarci-- prve_d tatey Joshua/Erin Edgar 5RW4e/kc/N-5, 3tn 60/41 NAME ADDRESS PHONE 6acal qc,-(?)-D--s-tra-X The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 15900 Xerxes Ave S 13116 W 60th St Stephane Cattelin ati1a5 l sib 15933 York Ave S Rental home Cynthia Ellwein circulated by: This 15921 York Ave S 15901 York Ave S Jeff/Cameran Carver new house -IAA °max `6se_ 01/14e_ 00N v-f.- hbov&- te,-) We are hoping to have the alley blacktopped. Do you agree to be assessed approximately $1500 for this? Address Name Signature Yes No 5900 Xerxes Ave S Stephane Cattelin 5904 Xerxes Ave S Lori McGowan Or. 5908 Xerxes Ave S Don/Jean Harlicker 5912 Xerxes Ave S Rick/Gail Jones ,. 5916 Xerxes Ave S Christel Hutchinson /4 — "-- oli.-3. 5920 Xerxes Ave S Raleigh Haugen 450": '..aritaiiiihre- vr 5924 Xerxes Ave S Tom/Patti Hines 14#7 1/- 5928 Xerxes Ave S Clint/Lynn Reynolds 5932 Xerxes Ave S Rental home 3100 W 60th St Rental home , 3104 W 60th St Cynthia Ellwein ' J.1.- .iii...111 1./. 3108 W 60th St Brian Haab/Jennine McDonough lov....pr2vam*.f, 4.....Arr 3112 W 60th St Taylor dIstad --t* Itiim. . 'ow'," 3116 W 60th St D.411(N t CIA,62,-, 5901 York Ave S Jeff/Cameran Carver f /,,, -;, 5905 York Ave S Marilyn Cavara \---,-f, ‘( bLi_. 5909 York Ave S Chriostopher Weigle 5913 York Ave S Tracy Alger (-6:Y7 6 t, r ' ---L- 5917 York Ave S Joshua/Erin Edgar .. , 1./--- 5921 York Ave S new house —WA occuipt..41 5925 York Ave S J.C. Compagnon ' re., poyLce, . 5929 York Ave S Katherine Hancock 1 5933 York Ave S Rental home 5913 59205921 5901 5925 5924 5908 320031005932 31165916 5904 5900 5928 5932 5924 5912 5908 5916 32045904 5933 5920 5929 5900 31125905 5928 31045917 5912 31085909 W 59TH ST XERXES AVEW 60TH STYORK AVEPROJECT LIMITS / Engineering DeptNovember 2018 Chowen Park A and B Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionGravel Alley PetitionCITYOFEDINAMINNESOTAINCORPORATED 1888 , e Yes No No Response APPENDIX N SEH Smoke Testing Report Engineers | Architects | Planners | Scientists Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196 SEH is 100% employee-owned | sehinc.com | 651.490.2000 | 800.325.2055 | 888.908.8166 fax August 24, 2018 RE: City of Edina Chowen Park Sewer Testing SEH No. EDINA 146901 14.00 Mr. Chad Millner, PE City Engineer City of Edina Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Dear Mr. Millner: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. (SEH) is pleased to submit the following report to the City of Edina (City) in reference to the sanitary sewer testing that was conducted in the Chowen Park neighborhood on August 8, 2018. Purpose SEH was hired by the City to conduct smoke testing of the sanitary sewer system on Chowen Avenue S and Beard Avenue S, between 56th Street W and 60th Street W. This area is within a predicted 100-year inundation area, with the main flooding area identified between 58th St W and 60th St W. The City had identified this inundation area using a hydrologic and hydraulic simulation, yet residents living in the area have not voiced concerns of standing water on their properties after heavy rainfall events. Smoke testing was conducted to find sources of clear/rain water discharging into the sanitary sewer system through entrance points such as catch basins, area drains, roof drains, uncapped cleanouts, roof leaders, and manhole lids in low areas. The assumption was that the storm water that would be anticipated to pond during storm events is actually entering the sanitary sewer system via these defects. Testing and setup Before any blowing of a liquid-based simulated smoke, SEH installed flow-thru plugs in the sanitary sewer at the extents of the area that was tested. This was done to prevent the smoke from entering areas of the City that were not notified of this testing. After the placement of the plugs, the next step involved blowing the simulated smoke into various sanitary manholes using a Hurco liquid smoke blower. The simulated smoke then flowed through the city line and up the private laterals until it could escape through the sewer vents on the homes or through the potential defects in the sanitary sewer system. Findings No significant defects were found that could contribute to increased flows to the sanitary system. Manhole lids were found to have open pick holes, but these manholes were also in the crown of the roads, resulting in little to no inflow of clear water. The only identified issue of potential significance was a driveway that slopes back to a garage drain. This drain most likely connects to the house’s sanitary lateral. No simulated smoke was observed coming from this drain during the test. Mr. Chad Millner, PE August 24, 2018 Page 2 An attached report details the results of the sanitary sewer testing. The report has information concerning the defects found and of the area that was tested with each setup. Some of the information includes locations of the blower (manhole smoke was injected), upstream and downstream extents of the testing run, type of defect, and square footage of runoff that the defect could take on during a rainfall event. Conclusion No defects were found while testing this area that could support the assumption that the storm water that would be anticipated to pond during storm events is actually entering the sanitary sewer system via a defect of the sanitary sewer system. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. Paul Kubesh Lindsey Roberts McKenzie, PE Hydrogeologist | Lead Field Technician Project Manager | Sr. Water Resources Engineer pk Attachment c: Andrew Scipioni, EIT, City of Edina Ross Bintner, PE, City of Edina Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, City of Edina Toby Muse, PE, SEH s:\ae\e\edina\146901\4-prelim-dsgn-rpts\edina_146901_testingreport_coverletter_24aug18.docx City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 1217 Mh 1217 515,397 138,662 8/16/2018 1 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: PJK Sunny Dry 1216 1214 1206 Yes 1 Loss of soil thru chimney rings. Frame of manhole has sagged. Heavy Public MH Frame Section Streets Bituminous 5 Photo 1 : Photo1.jpg Photo 2 : Photo2.jpg 8/8/2018 Page 1 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5836 Beard Ave House 515,372 138,371 8/16/2018 2 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: PJK Sunny Moderate 1216 1214 1206 Yes 2 Two cleanouts leaking smoke under unglued fittings. Light Private Cleanout Front Yard 12 and 15 ft west of curb. 16’ N of driveway.Grass 20 Photo 1 : Photo1.jpg Photo 2 : Photo2.jpg 8/8/2018 Page 2 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5836 Beard Ave House 515,372 138,371 8/16/2018 2 1 Photo 3 : Photo3.jpg Photo 4 : Photo4.jpg Page 3 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5924 Chowen Ave House 515,009 137,897 8/16/2018 3 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: ELH Sunny Dry 4032 4030 4020 Yes 1 Private NoSmokeSewerVent Pitched Roof Roof 8/8/2018 Page 4 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5909 Chowen Ave House 515,141 138,163 8/16/2018 4 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: ELH Sunny Dry 4032 4030 4020 Yes 1 Private NoSmokeSewerVent Pitched Roof Roof 8/8/2018 Page 5 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5828 Beard Ave House 515,336 138,495 8/16/2018 5 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: ELH Sunny Moderate 1216 1214 1206 Yes 1 Private NoSmokeSewerVent Pitched Roof Roof 8/8/2018 Page 6 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5821 Beard Ave House 515,455 138,689 8/16/2018 6 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: ELH Sunny Moderate 1216 1214 1206 Yes 1 Private NoSmokeSewerVent Pitched Roof Roof 8/8/2018 Page 7 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5809 Beard Ave House 515,456 138,835 8/16/2018 7 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: ELH Sunny Moderate 1216 1214 1206 Yes 1 Private NoSmokeSewerVent Pitched Roof Roof 8/8/2018 Page 8 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5609 Beard Ave House 515,462 140,151 8/16/2018 8 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: ELH Sunny Dry 1208 1212,1206 1205 Yes 1 Private NoSmokeSewerVent Pitched Roof Roof 8/8/2018 Page 9 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt City of Edina Sewer Testing Inspection Report Date Printed: Record No: Address: X Coordinate:Y Coordinate: General Location Information SEH Project No: General Location: Daily Work Schedule: Note: 146901 5725 Chowen Ave House 515,131 139,204 8/16/2018 9 1 Sim. Smoke Source: Surface: Runoff Area: Inspection Information Blower Location MH ID: Upstream MH ID:Downstream MH ID: Defect Found? Sector: Date/Time:By: Sim. Smoke Source Location: Sim. Smoke Source Location Notes:Surface Notes: Sim. Smoke Source Notes: Weather Conditions: Ground Conditions: MH Notes: Defect Number: Defect Notes: Sim. Smoke Density: Additional Notes: Additional Testing: ELH Sunny Dry 1211 1212,1210 1206 Yes 1 Private NoSmokeSewerVent Pitched Roof Roof 8/8/2018 Page 10 of 10 S:\AE\E\Edina\146901\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\90-GIS\Report\Edina_146901_Sewer_Tests_Rep ort.rpt APPENDIX O Preliminary Assessment Roll CHOWEN PARK A/B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NOs. BA-451 AND A-279 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PID Owner House No. Street Assessable REU Assessable Amount Assessable REU Assessable Amount 1 20-028-24-31-0071 LEIGH H MYERS 5800 ABBOTT AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 2 20-028-24-31-0070 KYLE K WARDIN & K L NELSON 5801 ABBOTT AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 3 20-028-24-31-0072 PATRICK D LEARY 5804 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 4 20-028-24-31-0069 DONALD & DIANNA EMOND 5805 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 5 20-028-24-31-0073 ALICE L GUIHER 5808 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 6 20-028-24-31-0068 GERALD VAN HEEL TRUSTEE 5809 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 7 20-028-24-31-0074 T M SAVIK & M E SAVIK 5812 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 8 20-028-24-31-0067 M CHRISTENSON & N COURNOYER 5813 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 9 20-028-24-31-0075 J A WELLING JR & T M WELLING 5816 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 10 20-028-24-31-0066 HUGH M REICHERT 5817 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 11 20-028-24-31-0076 MICHAEL S MCCORMICK 5820 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 12 20-028-24-31-0065 M N MOHS & J A MOHS 5821 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 13 20-028-24-31-0077 J & D QUIMBY 5824 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 14 20-028-24-31-0064 B A JENSEN & H B LIEBERMAN 5825 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 15 20-028-24-31-0078 KRISTIN E MARENTETTE 5828 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 16 20-028-24-31-0063 JON TOWNLEY/BARBARA TOWNLEY 5829 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 17 20-028-24-31-0079 A E DAHLIN/A D ENGELKING TR 5832 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 18 20-028-24-31-0062 SERENA J TOWNSEND 5833 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 19 20-028-24-31-0080 DEBORAH A KLEIN 5836 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 20 20-028-24-31-0061 LINDA J SOHN 5837 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 21 20-028-24-31-0081 K A PEARSON & R D PEARSON 5840 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 22 20-028-24-31-0060 MARK HADDAD & SHILPA V PATEL 5841 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 23 20-028-24-31-0082 ROBERT B & CHRISTINE W DOE 5844 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 24 20-028-24-31-0059 R W OUREN & K S OUREN 5845 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 25 20-028-24-31-0094 SHIRLEY M BOWERS 5900 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 26 20-028-24-31-0137 T P AKENSON & L A AKENSON 5901 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 27 20-028-24-31-0095 T J SCHROEDER/B A SCHROEDER 5904 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 28 20-028-24-31-0136 K BRANT & S M BRANT 5905 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 29 20-028-24-31-0096 MARK D SALSBURY 5908 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 30 20-028-24-31-0135 DOUGLAS D HYSTEAD 5909 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 31 20-028-24-31-0097 R R VAN HEEL & E PADILLA 5912 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 32 20-028-24-31-0134 SARA E CLANCY 5913 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 33 20-028-24-31-0098 D J QUINN & S A HENNEMAN 5916 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 34 20-028-24-31-0133 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 5917 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 35 20-028-24-31-0099 DEBORAH JEAN SCHILLER 5920 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 36 20-028-24-31-0132 JOHN DANIEL JOHNSON 5921 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 37 20-028-24-31-0100 JANET K FISHER 5924 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 38 20-028-24-31-0131 S A GILBERT & G H GILBERT 5925 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 39 20-028-24-31-0184 BRIAN HOBBINS & KATY HOBBINS 5928 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 40 20-028-24-31-0130 KATHLEEN T RECKE 5929 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 41 20-028-24-31-0129 ADRIAN E OLSON ETAL 5933 ABBOTT AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 42 20-028-24-32-0001 CATHRYN ORR & JAMES SARSET 5800 BEARD AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 43 20-028-24-31-0093 KATHERINE L ELEFANO 5801 BEARD AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 44 20-028-24-32-0002 CARYL E RANGE TRUSTEE 5804 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 45 20-028-24-31-0092 CRAIG O FREEMAN 5805 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 46 20-028-24-32-0003 J D SULLIVAN & L M SULLIVAN 5808 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 47 20-028-24-31-0091 MARCIA JANE WILLETT 5809 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 48 20-028-24-32-0004 DOLORES E KNUTSON TRUSTEE 5812 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 49 20-028-24-31-0090 JENNIFER A WINBERG 5813 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 50 20-028-24-32-0009 C J HOLTMEIER/J T HOLTMEIER 5816 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 51 20-028-24-31-0089 THOMAS E LOVE 5817 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 52 20-028-24-32-0010 ROBERT J & NANCY L BRENNY 5820 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 53 20-028-24-31-0088 B L TROLDAHL & M C TROLDAHL 5821 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 54 20-028-24-32-0012 J N ROGERS & D M THYSE 5824 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 55 20-028-24-31-0087 J E ERICKSON & K R ERICKSON 5825 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 56 20-028-24-32-0015 G E WARNER & L R BEAN-WARNER 5828 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 57 20-028-24-31-0086 V T MOUSSEAU REV INTE TRUST 5829 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 58 20-028-24-32-0017 MARK A RAAK 5832 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 59 20-028-24-32-0016 BARBARA L & R TRAN ALFREY 5836 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 60 20-028-24-31-0085 J TALBERG & D TALBERG 5837 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 61 20-028-24-31-0084 JUSTIN PIPRUDE & A PIPRUDE 5841 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 62 20-028-24-31-0083 J L DOUCETTE & K J DOUCETTE 5845 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 63 20-028-24-32-0020 R R NELSEN/M M MORGAN-NELSEN 5900 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 64 20-028-24-31-0115 PAGE D GRATZER 5901 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 65 20-028-24-32-0023 THOMAS F BUTLER TRUSTEE 5904 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 66 20-028-24-31-0114 ADITYA KALRA & PAVEENA KALRA 5905 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 67 20-028-24-32-0027 O & L MEERWALD 5908 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 68 20-028-24-31-0113 SARA A SCHWIEBERT 5909 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 69 20-028-24-32-0026 JEFFREY L SCHUH 5912 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 70 20-028-24-31-0112 B J HAYMAKER & L B HAYMAKER 5913 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 71 20-028-24-32-0029 P J DEWANE & M B DEWANE 5916 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 72 20-028-24-31-0111 WARREN E AJAX 5917 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 73 20-028-24-32-0030 DAVID DODGE & PEGGY DODGE 5920 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 74 20-028-24-31-0110 DENICE J HOTCH 5921 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ Roadway Alley Total Assessment CHOWEN PARK A/B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NOs. BA-451 AND A-279 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 75 20-028-24-32-0032 MARK A WALDORF 5924 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 76 20-028-24-31-0109 J C & S C OREN 5925 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 77 20-028-24-32-0033 T A PEDIANGCO/R A PEDIANGCO 5928 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 78 20-028-24-32-0034 LUANE E ROHMAN 5932 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 79 20-028-24-31-0108 M L SHUMWAY, R A S PEDIANGCO 5933 BEARD AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 80 20-028-24-32-0035 KATHERINE L SCHLIESMAN TRUST 5936 BEARD AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 81 20-028-24-32-0066 STEPHEN J SMITLEY 5800 CHOWEN AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 82 20-028-24-32-0006 STACY MCGRATH & SEAN MCGRATH 5801 CHOWEN AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 83 20-028-24-32-0063 J FELTON & S BESIADA 5804 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 84 20-028-24-32-0005 HOLLY HAYES 5805 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 85 20-028-24-32-0061 G NORGREN & D NORGREN 5808 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 86 20-028-24-32-0007 MICHAEL A SEASLY 5809 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 87 20-028-24-32-0059 M H HABAS & E A HABAS 5812 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 88 20-028-24-32-0057 KRISTEN K FRUETEL TRUSTEE 5816 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 89 20-028-24-32-0008 BRADLEY DAVIS & LISA DAVIS 5817 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 90 20-028-24-32-0056 D RUNDMAN & J RUNDMAN 5820 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 91 20-028-24-32-0013 SAMUEL SEXTON/LINDSEY SEXTON 5821 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 92 20-028-24-32-0052 GAIL M ECKERT 5824 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 93 20-028-24-32-0011 ROHAN LALL & CASSANDRA LALL 5825 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 94 20-028-24-32-0051 YVONNE M EISSINGER 5828 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 95 20-028-24-32-0014 M A WHITED & C L BOETTCHER 5829 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 96 20-028-24-32-0049 GRETCHEN L COOPER 5832 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 97 20-028-24-32-0019 ANASTASIOS BAKRITZES ET AL 5833 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 98 20-028-24-32-0048 CAROL RIPLEY WADSWORTH 5836 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 99 20-028-24-32-0018 J M KUHS & F A LUDWIG 5837 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 100 20-028-24-32-0046 J MONROE & K H MONROE 5900 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 101 20-028-24-32-0022 M C JOHNSON & J COLBURN 5901 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 102 20-028-24-32-0044 M MULGREW & J GLEASON ET AL 5904 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 103 20-028-24-32-0021 SYLVIA K EISLER 5905 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 104 20-028-24-32-0042 PETER R & ERIN M HULBERT 5908 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 105 20-028-24-32-0024 DORTHY J LEVIN REV LIVG TRST 5909 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 106 20-028-24-32-0041 MARVIN E MENZEL ETAL 5912 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 107 20-028-24-32-0025 S L LAUER & C A LAUER 5913 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 108 20-028-24-32-0038 KYLE WENZEL & KAREN WENZEL 5916 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 109 20-028-24-32-0028 CURTIS W OLSON 5917 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 110 20-028-24-32-0036 JASON L BUSEMAN 5920 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 111 20-028-24-32-0031 KATHERINE C COON 5921 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 112 20-028-24-32-0142 R P CONNELLY & A K JAROMBEK 5924 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 113 20-028-24-32-0139 TODD R DALE/THERESA E SLADEK 5925 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 114 20-028-24-32-0143 J R MINUS & G M LAMANCUSA 5928 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 115 20-028-24-32-0140 W LADEMANN JR & C LADEMANN 5929 CHOWEN AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 116 20-028-24-32-0144 M S MAMMEN HEINZ & P B HEINZ 5932 CHOWEN AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 117 20-028-24-32-0141 ERIN RAMBERG ET AL SUBJ/L E 5933 CHOWEN AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 118 20-028-24-32-0072 KATHERINE E RICHARDS 5800 DREW AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 119 20-028-24-32-0065 G J BOROWIAK & E B BOROWIAK 5801 DREW AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 120 20-028-24-32-0073 BETH A B SULLIVAN 5804 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 121 20-028-24-32-0064 JOSEPH SENNA 5805 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 122 20-028-24-32-0074 JANE E DUNCAN TRUST 5808 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 123 20-028-24-32-0062 KEVIN J & DIANE M BAGLEY 5809 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 124 20-028-24-32-0071 J R TOKAR & J F TOKAR 5812 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 125 20-028-24-32-0060 M J DAUM & D S VAN WEELE 5813 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 126 20-028-24-32-0076 HEIDI L HILLIKER 5816 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 127 20-028-24-32-0058 LISA M PHIFER/JARED B JONES 5817 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 128 20-028-24-32-0078 JILL S TAYLOR 5820 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 129 20-028-24-32-0055 E O JOHNSON & J M JOHNSON 5821 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 130 20-028-24-32-0080 JULIE J & JAMES C DONOVAN 5824 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 131 20-028-24-32-0053 A C GADTKE & R W GADTKE 5825 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 132 20-028-24-32-0082 SALLY A BORGEN 5828 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 133 20-028-24-32-0054 KEVIN & ANGELA REICHART 5829 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 134 20-028-24-32-0084 K G TAMTE ANDERSON 5832 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 135 20-028-24-32-0050 D F SHEEHAN & E S SHEEHAN 5833 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 136 20-028-24-32-0086 M D & N A BARNARD 5836 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 137 20-028-24-32-0087 ELIZABETH A FIGLMILLER 5900 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 138 20-028-24-32-0047 NATHANAEL A WOODBURY ET AL 5901 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 139 20-028-24-32-0088 P A SCHIMKE & N E SCHIMKE 5904 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 140 20-028-24-32-0045 J J ELVING & J S ELVING 5905 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 141 20-028-24-32-0091 EVA L BRYAN 5908 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 142 20-028-24-32-0043 PETER HANNA & SARAH STRATTON 5909 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 143 20-028-24-32-0094 D B KAUFMAN & B A SHERIDAN 5912 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 144 20-028-24-32-0040 JEANNE M PAPIN 5913 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 145 20-028-24-32-0096 J A CARLSON & D J CARLSON 5916 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 146 20-028-24-32-0037 JULIE A STROTHER 5917 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 147 20-028-24-32-0104 J R FRANS VERSLIUS 5920 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 148 20-028-24-32-0039 K NAIR & R V KRISHNAN 5921 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 149 20-028-24-32-0100 JOANNA M PENDERGAST TRUST 5924 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 150 20-028-24-32-0147 J A LANY & M E AMBLER LANY 5925 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 151 20-028-24-32-0102 R J-M PIERRE & N R OWENS 5928 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ CHOWEN PARK A/B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NOs. BA-451 AND A-279 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 152 20-028-24-32-0146 NEW YORK COMMUNITY BANK 5929 DREW AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 153 20-028-24-32-0099 F D WATSON & M WATSON 5932 DREW AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 154 20-028-24-32-0145 W NEUENDORF & M WINDISCH 5933 DREW AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 155 20-028-24-32-0134 B R TOZER & A C TOZER 5800 EWING AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 156 20-028-24-32-0067 J W MOSSEY & P J MOSSEY 5801 EWING AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 157 20-028-24-32-0135 NANCY H PHINNEY 5804 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 158 20-028-24-32-0068 K M WINJE & H A WINJE 5805 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 159 20-028-24-32-0128 ANN KUBUSEK & XIAOYU TANG 5808 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 160 20-028-24-32-0069 ANN MARIE LADD 5809 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 161 20-028-24-32-0129 G N OPHAUG & K R OPHAUG 5812 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 162 20-028-24-32-0070 ADAM F & MEGHAN D OLIVER 5813 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 163 20-028-24-32-0127 J JOHNSON & K A B JOHNSON 5816 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 164 20-028-24-32-0075 STEPHEN J HOUTZ 5817 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 165 20-028-24-32-0126 CONSTANCE L STUDER 5820 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 166 20-028-24-32-0077 ALLAN P ALNES ETAL TRS 5821 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 167 20-028-24-32-0118 F ROTHBERG & S ROTHBERG 5824 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 168 20-028-24-32-0079 K M CRISTADORO/E CRISTADORO 5825 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 169 20-028-24-32-0119 J L LUND & L S RICHMAN TRES 5828 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 170 20-028-24-32-0081 HOLLY MURPHY 5829 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 171 20-028-24-32-0120 A M TAMENE/SELOME G GEZAHEGN 5832 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 172 20-028-24-32-0083 ROBERT SPAIN & JANE SPAIN 5833 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 173 20-028-24-32-0121 TYLER W NELSON 5836 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 174 20-028-24-32-0085 C A & L C OSTREM 5837 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 175 20-028-24-32-0149 V PHADNIS & N PHADNIS 5848 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 176 20-028-24-32-0090 J R & S R MENDIOLA 5901 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 177 20-028-24-32-0151 C MOSLEY & T MOSLEY 5904 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 178 20-028-24-32-0089 JEANNETTE C E DORAN 5905 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 179 20-028-24-32-0092 J P & L A OPSAHL 5909 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 180 20-028-24-32-0136 JOHN R JESPERSON 5912 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 181 20-028-24-32-0093 BARBARA JANISCH 5913 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 182 20-028-24-32-0137 NANCY L JACOBSON 5916 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 183 20-028-24-32-0095 KATHRYN G BORYS 5917 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 184 20-028-24-32-0138 DALYN HILLMAN & LYNNE KARPA 5920 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 185 20-028-24-32-0098 A J TONGEN & G K TONGEN 5921 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 186 20-028-24-32-0106 ROBB VIRGIN & THERA VIRGIN 5924 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 187 20-028-24-32-0097 GLENN J LEARY/NICOLE M LEARY 5925 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 188 20-028-24-32-0107 J LAMPHERE & S LAMPHERE 5928 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 189 20-028-24-32-0101 J R CHUCKER & L HELD 5929 EWING AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 190 20-028-24-32-0103 P R HARRIS & J M YONTS 5945 EWING AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 191 20-028-24-31-0170 LAWRENCE D SIMMONS JR 3100 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 192 20-028-24-31-0171 CYNTHIA M ELLWEIN 3104 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 193 20-028-24-31-0172 JENNIFER L LESSIN 3108 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 194 20-028-24-31-0173 TAYLOR D OISTAD 3112 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 195 20-028-24-31-0174 D A HOLSTAD & K R HOLSTAD 3116 W 60TH ST 0.5 4,500.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 196 20-028-24-31-0147 DIANE KLEINMAN 3200 W 60TH ST 0.5 4,500.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 197 20-028-24-31-0148 THOMAS V ORTH 3204 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 198 20-028-24-31-0149 T L BAILEY & P M HARTER 3208 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 199 20-028-24-31-0150 SCOTT H SMITH & GIGI CHAN 3212 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 200 20-028-24-31-0151 R H & K E M LINDAAS 3216 W 60TH ST 0.5 4,500.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 201 20-028-24-31-0124 E A & B R THAYER TRSTS 3300 W 60TH ST 0.5 4,500.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 202 20-028-24-31-0125 SHERRY E SPEAR 3304 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 203 20-028-24-31-0126 MARY L KILEY 3308 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 204 20-028-24-31-0127 LDK BUILDERS INC 3312 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 205 20-028-24-31-0128 RANDALL L SUTTON/LEE A OWENS 3316 W 60TH ST 0.5 4,500.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 206 20-028-24-31-0103 T N NGUYEN & S A NGUYEN 3400 W 60TH ST 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 207 20-028-24-31-0104 GERHARD & MARY JO KNUTSON TR 3404 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 0 -$ -$ 208 20-028-24-31-0105 HITESH PATEL 3408 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 0 -$ -$ 209 20-028-24-31-0106 SEAN C & JANINE H LARSON 3412 W 60TH ST 0 -$ 0 -$ -$ 210 20-028-24-31-0107 ALPASLAN SAPMAZ ETAL 3416 W 60TH ST 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 211 20-028-24-32-0105 SUSAN M GORMLEY 3808 W 60TH ST 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 212 20-028-24-31-0006 LI QING GUAN 5828 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 213 20-028-24-31-0007 WAYNE C TRYGESTAD 5832 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 214 20-028-24-31-0008 KEVIN J & LAURA L BREYFOGLE 5836 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 215 20-028-24-31-0009 TASHI TSERING/JANGCHUP LHAMO 5844 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 216 20-028-24-31-0010 JUSTIN S HAUGER 5848 XERXES AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 217 20-028-24-31-0161 STEPHANE CATTELIN ET AL 5900 XERXES AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 8,000.00$ 218 20-028-24-31-0162 LORI J MCGOWAN 5904 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 219 20-028-24-31-0163 D & J HARLICKER 5908 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 220 20-028-24-31-0164 RICHARD JONES & GAIL M JONES 5912 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 221 20-028-24-31-0165 CHRISTEL L HUTCHINSON 5916 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 222 20-028-24-31-0166 RALEIGH HAUGEN 5920 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 223 20-028-24-31-0167 HINES LIVING TRUST 5924 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 224 20-028-24-31-0168 C F REYNOLDS & L REYNOLDS 5928 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 225 20-028-24-31-0169 VIRGINIA H BRAUNWARTH ET AL 5932 XERXES AVE 0 -$ 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 226 20-028-24-31-0023 J K JOHNSON & A JOHNSON 5800 YORK AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ CHOWEN PARK A/B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NOs. BA-451 AND A-279 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 227 20-028-24-31-0022 MICHELLE WAGENER 5801 YORK AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 228 20-028-24-31-0024 GENE PALUSKY 5804 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 229 20-028-24-31-0021 KARLEEN P LUTTER 5805 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 230 20-028-24-31-0025 JOHN H JACOBSON JR 5808 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 231 20-028-24-31-0020 WHITNEY M GIGA & MARK J GIGA 5809 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 232 20-028-24-31-0026 RICHARD W JACKSON SR TRSTEE 5812 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 233 20-028-24-31-0019 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 5813 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 234 20-028-24-31-0027 BARBARA E SOUTHER 5816 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 235 20-028-24-31-0018 JASON PETER HULBERT 5817 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 236 20-028-24-31-0028 J G LEIBERT & A LEIBERT 5820 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 237 20-028-24-31-0017 MICHAEL J SCHNAUS JR ET AL 5821 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 238 20-028-24-31-0029 MATTHEW T KUKLA 5824 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 239 20-028-24-31-0016 MARK A FENSTAD 5825 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 240 20-028-24-31-0030 DISTRESSED HSNG INVEST LLC 5828 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 241 20-028-24-31-0015 IRENE A SICHLER 5829 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 242 20-028-24-31-0031 D C HEGLEY & M A HEGLEY 5832 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 243 20-028-24-31-0014 S HEMMERLING & M HEMMERLING 5833 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 244 20-028-24-31-0032 JOHN G ANGELSON ETAL 5836 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 245 20-028-24-31-0013 M LANNING & PENNY LANNING 5837 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 246 20-028-24-31-0033 S & P STRATHMAN 5840 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 247 20-028-24-31-0012 ANNE KALUZA 5841 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 248 20-028-24-31-0034 LORELEI R KAISER 5844 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 249 20-028-24-31-0011 ERIC BROTTEN & E S BROTTEN 5845 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 250 20-028-24-31-0138 MARK W WELLNITZ 5900 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 251 20-028-24-31-0183 J M CARVER & C N CARVER 5901 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 252 20-028-24-31-0139 MAJID T MASHAD 5904 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 253 20-028-24-31-0182 MARILYN A CAVARA 5905 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 254 20-028-24-31-0140 JENNIFER L DAVIS-SCHOENECKER 5908 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 255 20-028-24-31-0181 CHRIOSTOPHER G WEIGLE 5909 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 256 20-028-24-31-0141 C TIGNANELLI & B SOUTHWELL 5912 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 257 20-028-24-31-0180 TRACY M ALGER ET AL TRUSTEE 5913 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 258 20-028-24-31-0142 MARY A KREMER 5916 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 259 20-028-24-31-0179 JOSHUA J EDGAR/ERIN E EDGAR 5917 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 260 20-028-24-31-0143 GAYLE C JOHNSON 5920 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 261 20-028-24-31-0178 C WIEGEL & W WIEGEL 5921 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 262 20-028-24-31-0144 ANNE M MONINE/BARRY W KELLEY 5924 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 263 20-028-24-31-0177 JEAN-CHARLES V COMPAGNON 5925 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 264 20-028-24-31-0145 DONALD D HILL & WIFE 5928 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 265 20-028-24-31-0176 R A JOHNSON & N R JOHNSON 5929 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 266 20-028-24-31-0146 JOANTHAN LUND & AMY LUND 5932 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 267 20-028-24-31-0175 REED GILBERT 5933 YORK AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 268 20-028-24-31-0047 ANDREW ARASHIBA & E ARASHIBA 5800 ZENITH AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 269 20-028-24-31-0046 BRADLEY KEITH LOHRDING 5801 ZENITH AVE 0.5 4,500.00$ 0 -$ 4,500.00$ 270 20-028-24-31-0048 AUSTIN M SOTO/SKYLER J SOTO 5804 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 271 20-028-24-31-0045 S LYSTER & H COOLEY 5805 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 272 20-028-24-31-0049 J L SODERBERG/K R SODERBERG 5808 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 273 20-028-24-31-0044 S BECKETT & A BECKETT 5809 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 274 20-028-24-31-0050 KIM J ROBSON 5812 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 275 20-028-24-31-0043 KRI LLC 5813 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 276 20-028-24-31-0051 J V MERRIAM & R K MERRIAM 5816 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 277 20-028-24-31-0042 ALEXANDRIA PAGE ANDERSON 5817 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 278 20-028-24-31-0052 D G KEENAN & L L KEENAN 5820 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 279 20-028-24-31-0041 BRUCE G PROKOSCH 5821 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 280 20-028-24-31-0053 PATRICIA EIDSMO 5824 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 281 20-028-24-31-0040 MONICA DECASTRO 5825 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 282 20-028-24-31-0054 M A LOESCH & K S LOESCH 5828 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 283 20-028-24-31-0039 ANGELA M KIM 5829 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 284 20-028-24-31-0055 DEBRA LYNN FIRCHAU 5832 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 285 20-028-24-31-0038 P MICHIELUTTI/L MICHIELUTTI 5833 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 286 20-028-24-31-0056 JULIE A BOWMAN 5836 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 287 20-028-24-31-0037 C A KOEPSELL & J M KOEPSELL 5837 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 288 20-028-24-31-0057 ERICA FRANTZ & COLLIN FRANTZ 5840 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 289 20-028-24-31-0036 G R HOFMANN & L R HOFMANN 5841 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 290 20-028-24-31-0058 D V PERRY & M A DALLIN-PERRY 5844 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 291 20-028-24-31-0035 DEBORAH JEAN PRIEM 5845 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 292 20-028-24-31-0116 B C DELAITSCH/C A DELAITSCH 5900 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 293 20-028-24-31-0160 B D HUGHES & C N J HUGHES 5901 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 294 20-028-24-31-0117 PATRICIA ANN MONTEZ 5904 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 295 20-028-24-31-0159 SONAM KHADO 5905 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 296 20-028-24-31-0118 TJB HOMES INC 5908 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 297 20-028-24-31-0158 K T ARNQUIST & L R ARNQUIST 5909 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 298 20-028-24-31-0119 CHRISTOPHER DRAKE 5912 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 299 20-028-24-31-0157 KAREN ELIZABETH SMITH 5913 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 300 20-028-24-31-0120 Z S LONGREN & K LONGREN 5916 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 301 20-028-24-31-0156 J A BJERKE & B E BJERKE 5917 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 302 20-028-24-31-0121 JOHN KYLE KNAUSS 5920 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 303 20-028-24-31-0155 KELLY A D & JASON D FLEISNER 5921 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 304 20-028-24-31-0122 MATTHEW P KORTAS ET AL TRES 5924 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ CHOWEN PARK A/B NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NOs. BA-451 AND A-279 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL 305 20-028-24-31-0154 L C ARDIS & M C FOSTER 5925 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 306 20-028-24-31-0153 JENNIFER MULLER 5929 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 0 -$ 9,000.00$ 307 20-028-24-31-0123 MARK A & JUDITH B SEGAL 5932 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ 308 20-028-24-31-0152 AMBER L LAMPRON 5933 ZENITH AVE 1 9,000.00$ 1 3,500.00$ 12,500.00$ Total 268 2,412,000.00$ 62 217,000.00$ 2,629,000.00$ ENGINEERING STUDY TODD PARK E NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Brookside Terrace, Motor Street IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-454 NOVEMBER 26, 2018 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 42003 11-26-18 Aaron Ditzler Reg. No. Date Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstructing the last gravel street in the City. Improvements include the installation of concrete curb and gutter, new bituminous pavement, regrading of a gravel alley and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $353,240. The estimated roadway cost is $58,500 and will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $11,700 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $294,740 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure.” This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, storm sewer system, watermain system and sanitary sewer system. LOCATION: The project includes Brookside Terrace and Motor Street. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways The roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed between 1910 and 1927 (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Todd Park E Neighborhood, 1937 All roadways within the project area are gravel surfaces without concrete curb and gutter. The roadway width varies from 12’ to 35’ (measured from edge of gravel to edge of gravel). A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area performed by Braun Intertec showed the roadway section varies from 10” to 1’ of gravel over a silty sand and sandy clay base. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc.). The average PCI for the City of Edina is 72 and the average PCI for Todd Park E is 0. An example of the current roadway condition can be seen in Photo 2. Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 4 Photo 2: Existing Roadway Condition Alley There is one gravel alley adjacent to the project area; Brookside Terrace between Motor Street and Brookside Avenue. The alley varies in width from 10’ to 28’ and has eight single-family residential properties adjacent to it. The Village of Edina obtained a 27’-wide easement from the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway in 1968 for “public roadway purposes”; however, a recent topographic survey indicates that the alley currently exists partially within this easement and partially on an adjacent parcel owned by the Soo Line Railroad Company, a subsidiary of Canadian Pacific Railway (see Figure 2). Figure 2: Brookside Terrace Roadway Easement Brookside Terrace is currently maintained by the City (including snow-plowing). Traffic and Crash Data Given the location and context of this project, staff has not measure traffic volumes or speeds. It is assumed that volumes and speeds within the project area are comparable to most local streets in the City (≤500 vehicles per day, 85th percentile speeds ≤30 miles per hour). Crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 5 Multi-Modal Transportation Pedestrian Facilities There are no pedestrian facilities within the project area; however there are sidewalks on West 44th Street and Brookside Avenue immediately adjacent to the project area (see Appendix B). Bicycle Facilities There are no bicycle facilities within the project area; however there is a shared bike route on West 44th Street immediately adjacent to the project area (see Appendix C). Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system consists of 8” and 12” vitrified clay pipe (VCP) installed between 1951 and 1979. Some segments of the sanitary sewer are encased in concrete. Historical records indicate there have been few sewer back-ups or blockages in the area (see Appendix D). Watermain The watermain system consists of 1.5” copper and 6” ductile iron pipe (DIP) installed between 1965 and 1979. The overall system has experienced relatively few breaks (see Appendix D). The fire hydrants are original to the neighborhood. Many homes in the neighborhood were constructed prior to availability of municipal water. Although a few have had private wells properly sealed, City records suggest others remain unsealed. Based on Utility Billing records, there are no properties in the project area that rely on private wells for domestic water. Storm Sewer The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundaries of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The system consists of 12” corrugated metal pipe (CMP) as well as 12” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) installed between 1965 and 1980. There are relatively few storm sewer inlets and pipes within the project area. All roadways within the project area discharge directly to Minnehaha Creek. Recent aerial photography indicates sediment from the roadways and alley has entered the storm sewer system and accumulated at the outlet to Minnehaha Creek (see Photo 3). Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 6 Photo 3: Sediment Delta at Outlet to Minnehaha Creek Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications and cable utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are a combination of overheard and underground facilities located in backyards or along the boulevards. There is no street lighting within the project area. DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendices B and C, there are no proposed pedestrian or bicycle facilities within the project area. 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 7 All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled. Installation of new pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems. In addition, a project workshop was help to discuss the proposed improvements and receive input on the project from stakeholders (see Residents). Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place pipe liners. This project will also reduce inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix E. 2018 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan The CWRMP identified flood inundation adjacent to the project area along Minnehaha Creek for both the 10-percent and 1-percent-annual-chance event (also referred to as the 10-year and 100-year frequency event, respectively). This inundation area lies along Minnehaha Creek to the east of the project area, as shown in Figure 3. Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 8 Figure 3: Todd Park E Flood Zone (MHC_1) This flooding could impact the structures at 5107 West 44th Street and 5131 Motor Street within the project area. Potential manhole surcharging was also identified in the 10-percent and 1-percent-annual-chance flood events. Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. They support paving the existing gravel roads to reduce future maintenance costs. They also support replacement of deficient watermain components (including fire hydrants, gate valves and water services) and improvements to the storm sewer outlet to Minnehaha Creek. They recommended replacing existing CMP within the project area. Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire Departments. The Fire Department supports watermain improvements, including adding fire hydrants as necessary to meet public safety standards. In addition, they note that temporary fire hydrants should be of a consistent style for ease of access, and that Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 9 emergency access should be maintained at all times during construction. The Fire Department also supports installation of “No Parking” signs to facilitate emergency access. Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 25, 2018, a draft engineering study was provided for review. The ETC noted that vehicles traveling along the roadways within the project area will be able pass each other, but such movements will be more restrictive after construction due to the proposed roadway widths. Relevant minutes from the ETC meeting are included in Appendix F. Residents As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3 years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to open houses on September 26, 2016 and September 25, 2017. Materials from these meetings are available upon request. On June 4, 2018, residents were asked to complete a questionnaire, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems within the project area. The questionnaire was completed by 5 of 7 property owners, a return rate of 71%. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix G. Due to the unique nature of this project, residents were invited to a project workshop held on August 2, 2018 to discuss the proposed improvements and receive input on the project. This meeting was attended by six residents representing five properties. Materials from this workshop can be found in Appendix H. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on August 13, 2018 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood and others proposed for construction in 2019. The meeting was attended by one resident within the project area. Materials from this meeting can be found in Appendix I. On October 31, 2018, the Engineering Department mailed another letter to residents within the project area. This letter provided residents with a preliminary design of the roadways (created from input received from residents as well as staff) and an estimated range of assessments. The preliminary design letter can be found in Appendix J. Relevant correspondence from residents regarding the project can be found in Appendix K. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 10 Roadways Typical Section The gravel roadways are proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. A minimum of 8” of recycled gravel material will be hauled in, graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous base and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. Brookside Terrace and Motor Street are designated as a Local Streets in the Living Streets Plan. Per this Plan’s design guidelines, Local Streets have a typical width of 27’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb) without sidewalks or 24’ with a 5’ sidewalk on one side. Brookside Terrace north of West 44th Street is proposed to be constructed with a 15’ roadway section; Motor Street and Brookside Terrace south of West 44th Street are proposed to be constructed with 20’ roadway sections (see Figures 4 and 5). These narrower widths are more comparable to the existing conditions, and are being recommended to minimize construction impacts. Figure 4: Todd Park E (north) Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 11 Figure 5: Todd Park E (south) Parking The City’s Living Streets Policy evaluates on-street parking based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand and costs of construction and maintenance. Given the proposed roadway widths, the existing demand for parking and the requirement to provide adequate access for emergency vehicles, staff believes that one-sided parking is appropriate on all of the roadways within the project area. The existing and proposed street widths and parking recommendations are shown in Table 1. Street Existing Roadway Width¹, feet Proposed Roadway Width (face to face), feet Parking Brookside Terrace (West 44th Street to north dead end) 12 - 20 15² East side only Brookside Terrace (West 44th Street to Motor Street) 15 - 22 20² East side only Motor Street (Brookside Terrace to dead end) 21 - 35 20² North side only ¹Existing roadway width is measured from edge of gravel to edge of gravel ²Measured to back of surmountable curb or face of bulkhead curb Table 1: Street Widths and Parking Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 12 Roadway Signage All street signs within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix L). All new signs shall conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Alley Several residents along Brookside Terrace expressed a desire for the City to continue to maintain this alley, while leaving it a gravel surface. Because the majority of the alley is not located within an easement, and relocation would cause significant impacts to adjacent properties (including the relocation of at least two accessory structures), it proposed to perform no improvements to the alley as part of this project. Public Works will continue to maintain the gravel surface as it currently does. Multi-Modal Transportation There are no proposed pedestrian or bicycle facilities within the project area. All adjacent pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer main has been televised, and portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) methods. These repairs will address the issues of sags, cracks and groundwater infiltration into the sewer main. The manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain Echologics, LLC was hired by the City to perform a non-invasive pipe condition assessment on the watermain within the project area, and staff has reviewed historical break data to determine the extent of improvements needed. Undersized copper pipe will be upgraded to 6” mains and all associated water services will be replaced. All fire hydrants and gate valves within the project area will be replaced and, if needed, additional hydrants will be installed to meet current public safety standards. The new fire hydrants will include the Storz nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. As part of the City’s Wellhead Protection Plan, staff plans to engage property owners who have unsealed private wells and encourage them to have them properly sealed. Storm Sewer New concrete curb and gutter will be installed throughout the project, providing a continuous, functional conduit for stormwater. A combination of the standard bulkhead-style and surmountable-style curbs is proposed to maximize the drivable width of the roadways. The storm sewer network will have modifications to resolve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition, and some structures will be replaced with sump structures to collect displaced gravel from the adjacent alley’s stormwater run-off before it enters Minnehaha Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 13 Creek. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Sediment removal will also be performed at the outlet in Minnehaha Creek; this work will require a dredging permit through the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. The modeled flood risk along Minnehaha Creek is regional in nature and influencing the flood elevation cannot be addressed within the scope of this project. Private Utilities Staff met with representatives of several private utility companies on October 12, 2018 to notify them of the proposed 2019 reconstruction projects and discuss preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. Currently, the City does not have a standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved. Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies. Staff recommends no revisions to the current street lighting condition. RIGHT-OF-WAY /EASEMENTS: Existing right-of-way in this neighborhood varies from 40’ to 50’. It is anticipated that the majority of this project can be constructed within existing ROW or easements. Many properties have vegetation, boulders, retaining walls or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary work. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $353,240 (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical, and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway Total: $ 58,500 Special Assessments Sanitary Sewer $ 56,420 Watermain $ 98,960 Storm Sewer $ 139,360 Utility Total: $ 294,740 City Utility Funds Project Total: $ 353,240 Table 2: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statues. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 5 residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Todd Park E project area. The estimated assessment per REU is $11,700 (see Figure 6). Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 14 Figure 6: Preliminary Assessment Map The formulas for calculating REUs are described below: Single-Family Residential Corner Lots 5120 and 5139 West 44th Street; = 0.5 REU (partial access off West 44th Street) 5107 West 44th Street; = 0 REU (inaccessible from Motor Street) All other properties are single-family residential located entirely within the project area and will be subjected to an assessment of 1 REU. The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix M. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the past and future tasks to be performed related to the project: Engineering Study Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-454 November 26, 2018 15 Neighborhood Open House (all 2018/2019 projects) September 26, 2016 Neighborhood Open House (all 2019/2020 projects) September 25, 2017 Project Workshop August 2, 2018 Neighborhood Informational Meeting (all 2019 projects) August 13, 2018 ETC Engineering Study Review October 25, 2018 Receive Engineering Study December 4, 2018 Public Improvement Hearing December 10, 2018 Bid Opening March/April 2019 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2019 Complete Construction Fall 2019 Final Assessment Hearing October 2020 RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2019 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Todd Park E neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Crash Data B. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks E. Living Streets Plan F. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes G. Resident Questionnaire H. Project Workshop Meeting Materials I. Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials J. Preliminary Roadway Design Letter K. Correspondence from Residents L. Signs M. Preliminary Assessment Roll APPENDIX A Crash Data Todd Park E Crash Data Location Severity Year Month Time A Property Damage - Collision with Motor Vehicle 2007 February 12:57 p.m. APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Braemar Golf Course Bredesen Park Rosland Park Pamela Park Lewis Park Highlands Park Walnut Ridge Park Todd Park Garden Park Heights Park Van Valkenburg Park Fred Richards Golf Course Creek Valley Park Lake Edina Park Krahl Hill Normandale Park Weber Field Park Arneson Acres Park Countryside Park Alden Park Utley Park Yorktown Park Wooddale Park Arden Park York Park Cornelia Park Strachauer Park Fox MeadowPark Edinborough Park KojetinPark McGuirePark BirchcrestPark SherwoodPark Melody LakePark Williams Park ChowenPark St. John'sPark TingdalePark BrowndalePark GrandviewSquare FrankTupa Park Courtney Fields ?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y Mud Lake )y ?ÞA@ ?úA@ LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake Minnehaha Creek N in e Mi le Cree k Nine Mile Creek Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVEFRANCE AVE SXERXES AVE SCAHILL RD70TH ST W 66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W GLEASON RD70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W / Engineering DeptMay 2018 Pedestrian Facilities Proposed FacilitiesExisting Facilities Existing Sidewalk Existing Park Pathway Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail New Primary Sidewalk New Secondary Sidewalk New Shared Use Path Upgrade to Shared Use Path Twin Loops Facility APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map ?ÞA@ )y ?úA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake AldenPark VanValkenburgPark FoxMeadowPark HighlandsPark Todd Park Weber FieldParkKojetinPark BrowndalePark WooddaleParkWilliamsParkUtleyPark FrankTupaPark SherwoodPark ArdenPark YorkPark ChowenPark PamelaParkSt JohnsPark StrachauerPark RoslandPark BristolParkCorneliaPark ArnesonAcresPark LakeEdinaParkFred RichardsGolf Course YorktownPark EdinboroughPark GardenPark MelodyLakePark TingdalePark CountrysidePark BredesenPark WalnutRidgePark KrahlHill Creek Valley Park HeightsPark NormandalePark McGuirePark LewisParkBraemar Park and Golf Course(Courtney Fields) Minnehaha Creek Ni ne M ile C re e k Nine Mile Creek Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBlake RdVernon AveFrance Ave SXerxes Ave SCahill Rd70th St W Interlachen Blvd Maloney Ave 4 4 th S t W 50th St W 54th St W 58th St W Gleason Rd70th St W 76th St W Dewey Hill Rd Valley View Rd Valley View Rd Minnesota Dr78th St W Wooddale AveTracy AveParklawn AveConcord AveBenton Ave Gle a s o n R dMalibu RdGreen Farms RdMcCauley Trl SMirror Lakes DrLincoln DrWashington AveDivision St Vernon AveGolf Ter Code AveWilryan AveNormandale RdWest Shore DrCornelia DrFrance Ave SYork Ave S77th St WOhms LnHilary Ln Olinger Blvd 66th St W Antrim Rd63rd St W Xerxes Ave S69th St W Bush Lake RdMetro Blvd66th St W 62nd St W Valley Ln Brookside Ave?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y 74th St W V alley View R dEngineering DeptMay 2018 / O:\Users\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Asbuilts.mxd Proposed Bicycle Facilities New Shared Use Path Upgrade to Shared Use Path Standard Bike Lane New Buffered Bike Lane Upgrade to Buffered Bike Lane Neighborhood Slow Street Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Twin Loops Facility APPENDIX D Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks 4373 4366 4380 4350 4359 4386 4351 5101 4377 4412 5107 5225 4367 4369 4373 4416 4401 4404-08 4376 4378 4371 4375 4355 4375 4504 51315120 4381 4429 4425 5135 51164508 5139 4385 4383 4500 4505 44174421 4384 4413 4425 4401 5243 4374 4372 4368 4370 4501 4380 5010 4425BROOKSIDE AVEW 44TH ST BROOKSIDE CT BROOKSIDE TERRMOTOR ST PROJECT LIMITS PROJECT LIMITS City of Saint Louis Park City of Edina / Engineering DeptOctober 2018 Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksTodd Park E NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-454CITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPORA T E D1888 ,e Sewer BlocksWatermain Breaks APPENDIX E Living Streets Plan Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy APPENDIX F Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room October 25, 2018 I. Reports/Recommendations A. 2019 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Draft Engineering Studies Assistant City Engineer, Aaron Ditzler, addressed the ETC’s questions and discussed the 2019 neighborhood reconstruction projects. The following comments were made: • Todd Park o Cars will be able to pass but it will be tight. Motion was made by commissioner Olson and seconded by commissioner Johnson to write an advisory communication to the City Council in support of the Beard Avenue Sidewalk Construction in the Chowen Park A and B project area. All voted Aye. Motion Carried. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Iyer, Surya 1 1 2 100% LaForce, Tom 1 1 2 100% Kane, Bocar 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Miranda, Lou 1 1 2 100% Olson, Larry 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Richman, Lori 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Ruthruff, Erik 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Scherer, Matthew 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 90% Veluvali, Shankar 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Emmanual Ayelomi (s) 1 1 2 100% Yeukai Zimbwa (s) 1 1 2 100% Jenny Ma (s) 1 1 1 1 1 5 50% Tessa Yeager (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 60% APPENDIX G Resident Questionnaire 66.67%4 33.33%2 Q1 Does your property have drainage issues the City should know about?Examples: History of flooding/standing water, grading, backyard drain, nuisance sump pump, etc. Answered: 6 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 6 #PLEASE COMMENT ON THE TYPES PROBLEMS YOU HAVE:DATE 1 The storm drain to the west of the corner of Brookside Terrace and Motor Court is plugged and the slope of Brookside Terrace pushes the water down Motor Street. This leads to occasional pooling of water. 8/7/2018 8:44 AM 2 Water drains from road into my driveway 7/13/2018 11:58 AM 3 If the road isn't graded correctly water can run the wrong way. Also, water backs up in spring when the snow melts because of the way the road is plowed (or recently not plowed well) 6/20/2018 2:44 PM 4 water drainage goes through our yard. Brookside Terrace should be graded away from Motor St 6/8/2018 5:34 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 1 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 16.67%1 50.00%3 33.33%2 Q2 How concerned are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? Answered: 6 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 6 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 2 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%5 100.00%5 Q3 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Brookside Terrace 8/7/2018 8:44 AM 2 44th Street 7/31/2018 4:43 PM 3 Brookside Terrace.6/20/2018 2:44 PM 4 Brookside Terrace 6/11/2018 7:51 AM 5 44th St and Brookside Ave 6/8/2018 5:34 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 Cars coming off of Brookside or 44th Street that drive fast down Brookside Terrace but are not going to a destination on Brookside Terrace. 8/7/2018 8:44 AM 2 children in area 7/31/2018 4:43 PM 3 If Brookside Terrace is too nicely graded, cars can cut through between 44th street and Brookside, especially if following a bus. They will speed up Brookside Terrace to try and save time. Brookside Terrace should not be upgraded or it will be unsafe. 6/20/2018 2:44 PM 4 Children and Pets 6/11/2018 7:51 AM 5 cars turn into 44th street at high rates of speed. should have stop signs. cars do not stop for people in the marked crosswalk 6/8/2018 5:34 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 3 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 40.00%2 40.00%2 20.00%1 Q4 How concerned are you with the volume of traffic or the number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 4 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%3 100.00%3 Q5 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 3 Skipped: 3 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Corner of Brookside and Interlachen.8/7/2018 8:46 AM 2 Brookside Terrace 6/11/2018 7:52 AM 3 44th St and Brookside Ave 6/8/2018 5:35 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 Very difficult to turn left at above intersection when coming up the hill on Brookside. Additional density in the area will make the problems more challenging. 8/7/2018 8:46 AM 2 If it would be paved, there would be much more traffic 6/11/2018 7:52 AM 3 cars speed through the area and do not stop for people in marked crosswalk 6/8/2018 5:35 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 5 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 60.00%3 40.00%2 Q6 How concerned are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Examples of poor motorist behavior include speeding, rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively.) Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 6 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%5 80.00%4 Q7 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Brookside Terrace 8/7/2018 8:47 AM 2 44th St and Brookside Ave 7/31/2018 4:45 PM 3 See previous answer 6/20/2018 2:45 PM 4 Brookside Terrace 6/11/2018 7:53 AM 5 44th St and Brookside Ave 6/8/2018 5:35 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 Speed of folks cutting through.8/7/2018 8:47 AM 2 Motorists zoom around corner on to 44th and it's hard to see them coming 7/31/2018 4:45 PM 3 If it were to be paved, there may be more aggressive driving 6/11/2018 7:53 AM 4 speeding, driving aggressively 6/8/2018 5:35 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 7 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 0.00%0 100.00%5 Q8 In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or running 8 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%5 0.00%0 Q9 Do you feel that any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 #IF YES, WHICH INTERSECTION?DATE 1 44th and Brookside. When stop sign was removed it increased the speed of cars turning to go east on 44th Street. 8/7/2018 8:48 AM 2 44th and Brookside 7/31/2018 4:46 PM 3 It is too easy to drive quickly after turning from Brookside to 44th Street. It is a danger to pedestrians. 6/20/2018 2:46 PM 4 Pulling out of Brookside Terrace on to 44th Street 6/11/2018 7:54 AM 5 44th St. and Brookside Ave 6/8/2018 5:35 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 9 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 80.00%4 60.00%3 0.00%0 20.00%1 80.00%4 0.00%0 20.00%1 0.00%0 40.00%2 Q10 Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 Total Respondents: 5 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 Should be a three way stop 7/31/2018 4:46 PM Lack of traffic cont... Issues with sight lines ... Drivers failing to s... Drivers failing to... Drivers turning corn... Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 10 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 2 drivers do not stop for marked crosswalk 6/8/2018 5:35 PM 11 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 60.00%3 0.00%0 40.00%2 Q11 In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging,... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, running 12 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 60.00%3 40.00%2 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q12 How frequently do you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood? Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 13 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%5 0.00%0 40.00%2 20.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q13 If you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 Total Respondents: 5 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE There are no responses. Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) t... Travel to/from destination... Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 14 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q14 If you don't walk, jog or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Answered: 1 Skipped: 5 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Time constraints 6/8/2018 5:35 PM 15 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 20.00%1 20.00%1 40.00%2 20.00%1 0.00%0 Q15 How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 16 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 60.00%3 0.00%0 40.00%2 20.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q16 If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 Total Respondents: 5 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE There are no responses. Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) t... Travel to/from destination... Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 17 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q17 If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Answered: 0 Skipped: 6 #RESPONSES DATE There are no responses. 18 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 60.00%3 40.00%2 Q18 How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 Very frequently... Frequently (2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 19 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 20.00%1 40.00%2 0.00%0 40.00%2 Q19 How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 20 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 40.00%2 40.00%2 20.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q20 How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 #ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ABOUT PARKING?DATE There are no responses. Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 21 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q21 Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Need the ability to cover the no parking signs on 44th Street for the occasional (once every couple of years) for special events. 8/7/2018 8:50 AM 2 Prefer keeping Brookside Terrace unpaved both for ambiance and for reducing speed.7/31/2018 4:50 PM 3 I think it is fine to have a gravel road. "upgrading" to pavement will cause increased runoff and heat. Also, there will be incentive for cars to drive too fast to attempt to cut through. Proper grading of the road is the best fix. 6/20/2018 2:49 PM 4 Currently our street is unpaved, which helps slow down traffic and congestion.6/11/2018 7:57 AM 5 Do not pave Brookside Terrace or Motor St. They are fine just as they are. Just plow them in the winter. 6/8/2018 5:36 PM 22 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 100.00%5 Q22 Do you favor improving the streetlights in your neighborhood (residential streetlights are funded by special assessment)? Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 5 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 absolutely not. we have too much light pollution as it is, especially those new lights are horrible 6/8/2018 5:36 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 23 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q23 Street Number Answered: 4 Skipped: 2 #RESPONSES DATE 1 5139 8/7/2018 8:50 AM 2 5139 7/31/2018 4:51 PM 3 5131 6/20/2018 2:49 PM 4 5131 6/8/2018 5:36 PM 24 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q24 Street name Answered: 5 Skipped: 1 #RESPONSES DATE 1 W. 44th Street 8/7/2018 8:50 AM 2 44th Street 7/31/2018 4:51 PM 3 Motor Street 6/20/2018 2:49 PM 4 Brookside Terrace 6/11/2018 7:57 AM 5 Motor St.6/8/2018 5:36 PM 25 / 25 Todd Park E Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire APPENDIX H Project Workshop Meeting Materials 8/14/2018 1 The CITYof EDINA 2019 Todd Park E Roadway Reconstruction Project Workshop August 2, 2018 The CITYof EDINAProject Details –Todd Park E •14 properties •0.1 miles of road •3 fire hydrants www.EdinaMN.gov 2-A The CITYof EDINAAgenda •Introductions/Timeline •Project Scope •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Communication •How to Prepare •Q&A www.EdinaMN.gov 3-C The CITYof EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4-C Introductions Director of Engineering Engineering Technicians Engineering Coordinator Chad Millner Liz Moore Tom Haataja Andrew Scipioni Derek Northenscold Assistant Transportation Engineering City Engineer Planner Services Manager Mark Nolan Ross Bintner Charlie Gerk Drew Torgerson Jon Moore The CITYof EDINAProject Process www.EdinaMN.gov 5-C The CITYof EDINATypical Project Timeline www.EdinaMN.gov 6-C July – September 2018 Engineering studies/estimates provided December 2018 Public hearings January – March 2019 Plan preparation and bidding April – May 2019 Construction begins October – November 2019 Construction concludes Spring 2020 Warranty work Fall 2020 Final assessment hearing 8/14/2018 2 The CITYof EDINA •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •- Extends pavement life •- Maximizes economics of scale •Prioritized based on; •- Pavement condition •-Age of original construction •- Utility issues www.EdinaMN.gov 7-A Why My Street? The CITYof EDINAWhy Reconstruct? •Only gravel public street in Edina •- Requires more maintenance than other streets •Water quality concerns for adjacent Minnehaha Creek •Utility issues to address beneath street www.EdinaMN.gov 8-A The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains www.EdinaMN.gov 9-A •Sanitary Sewer - Inflow and infiltration - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions – Right-of-Way •Landscaping features •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences www.EdinaMN.gov 10-C The CITYof EDINAWhat/Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey www.EdinaMN.gov 11-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Utilities •Localized watermain and service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •Localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Storm sewer upgrades •- Sump pump drain pipe installed where feasible www.EdinaMN.gov 12-A 8/14/2018 3 The CITYof EDINA •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Utility Ownership www.EdinaMN.gov 13-C Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Sump Services in ROW to be relocated to the property line if not connected •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website www.EdinaMN.gov 14-C The CITYof EDINAPrivate Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance •Streetlight upgrades typically not included with project www.EdinaMN.gov 15-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Roadway •Installation of curb & gutter •New roadbed and pavement surface www.EdinaMN.gov 16-A The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Plan •Approved by City Council May 6, 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit riders •Incorporates; •- Minimum roadway design elements •- Sidewalk Facilities Plan •- Bicycle Facilities Plan •-Active Routes to School Plan www.EdinaMN.gov 17-C The CITYof EDINARoadway Classifications www.EdinaMN.gov 18-A 8/14/2018 4 The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced/installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy www.EdinaMN.gov 19-A The CITYof EDINAResident Input •Street Widths - 21’ minimum - 25’ (one-sided parking) - 28’ (two-sided parking) •Storm sewer improvements to Brookside Ter south of Motor St - Regrade to improve drainage •Sidewalk connection to W 44th St? www.EdinaMN.gov 20 The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Localized flooding during rainfall •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 21-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in yards •Construction equipment stored on streets •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) www.EdinaMN.gov 22-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 5 days to allow driveways to cure •Irrigation and pet fence systems most likely will be damaged www.EdinaMN.gov 23-A The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •-You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •- Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be seeded www.EdinaMN.gov 24-A 8/14/2018 5 The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •We will; •- Provide opportunities for input •- Keep you informed •- Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs www.EdinaMN.gov 25-C The CITYof EDINACity Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •- Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •- Sanitary sewer •-Watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 26-C The CITYof EDINAPedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •- Sidewalks •- Bike lanes •-Associated signage and pavement markings www.EdinaMN.gov 27-C The CITYof EDINADo Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •- Snowplowing •- Pothole repairs •- Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction www.EdinaMN.gov 28-C Source: Hennepin County website 8/2/2016 The CITYof EDINASpecial Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers 100% of roadway costs (20% on MSA roadways) •- Roadway and driveway removals •- Subgrade materials •-Asphalt pavement •- Restoration www.EdinaMN.gov 29-C The CITYof EDINAResidential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •- Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties www.EdinaMN.gov 30-C ScenarioScenarioScenarioScenario Land UseLand UseLand UseLand Use ClassClassClassClass REU FactorREU FactorREU FactorREU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 B Multi-Family Residential 0.8 8/14/2018 6 The CITYof EDINASpecial Assessment History www.EdinaMN.gov 31 The CITYof EDINAAssessment Timing •Project Construction Year: Summer 2019 •Final Assessment Known: October 2020 •Assessment Filed w/ County: November 2020 •Assessment on Tax Statement: January 2021 www.EdinaMN.gov 32-C The CITYof EDINAPayment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance charges •Pay 25%; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older •- Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •- 2016 interest rate was 3.25% www.EdinaMN.gov 33-C The CITYof EDINACommunication www.EdinaMN.gov 34-A •Regular Mail -All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires - Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers -Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, paving, temporary inaccessibility) •City Website Project Page The CITYof EDINAProviding Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •-Traffic/pedestrian issues •- Street drainage issues •- Streetlight upgrades •- Sump pump connection options •Public hearings in November and December 2018 •- Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns www.EdinaMN.gov 35-A The CITYof EDINACity Extra •Free, weekly email updates on project progress and schedules •Best way to stay informed •www.EdinaMN.gov/CityExtra •- Check box next to your project name •If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates upon request www.EdinaMN.gov 36-A 8/14/2018 7 The CITYof EDINAHow To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Sign up for City Extra •Ask questions, stay informed www.EdinaMN.gov 37-C The CITYof EDINA Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Contact Us www.EdinaMN.gov 38-C Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449LMoore@edinamn.gov Andrew Scipioni Engineering Technician 952-826-0440AScipioni@edinamn.gov The CITYof EDINAQuestions? www.EdinaMN.gov 39-C Thanks for your time! 2019 TODD PARK E NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT WORKSHOP AUGUST 2, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 2i sit A 3 j y cc> S r 3 _57 - 4 L r. --TD (A) 5 1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 APPENDIX I Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials 8/14/2018 1 The CITYof EDINA 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting August 13, 2018 The CITYof EDINAAgenda •Introductions •Why Reconstruct •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Project Scopes •Timeline •Communication •How to Prepare •Q&A www.EdinaMN.gov 2-C The CITYof EDINA2019 Projects •Chowen Park A & B – 308 properties •Indian Trails B & C – 93 properties •Indian Hills C – 16 properties •Todd Park E – 7 properties www.EdinaMN.gov 3-C The CITYof EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4-A Introductions Director of Assistant Engineering Transportation Engineering City Engineer Services Manager Planner Engineering Technicians Chad Ross Mark Tom Andrew DerekMillner Bintner Nolan Haataja Scipioni Northenscold Engineering GIS Water Resources Graduate Traffic SafetyCoordinator Administrator Coordinator Engineer Coordinator Liz Rebecca Jessica Charlie Nick Moore Foster Wilson Gerk Bauler Jon Drew Moore Torgerson The CITYof EDINA •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •- Extends pavement life •- Maximizes economics of scale •Prioritized based on; •- Pavement condition •-Age of original construction •- Underground utility issues www.EdinaMN.gov 5-A Why My Street? The CITYof EDINAWhy Reconstruct? •Originally constructed in 1910s-1990s (20-100 years old) •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, seal coat) www.EdinaMN.gov 6-A 8/14/2018 2 The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Roadways •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Most streets have curb and gutter •Many properties already have concrete driveway aprons www.EdinaMN.gov 7-A The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions -Alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 8-A •Concrete and gravel •Some areas have storm sewer •Concerns about required maintenance (snow plowing operations) The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains www.EdinaMN.gov 9-C •Sanitary Sewer - Inflow and infiltration - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing The CITYof EDINA •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences •Landscaping •Outwalks/steps Existing Conditions – Right-of-Way www.EdinaMN.gov 10-C The CITYof EDINAWhat/Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey www.EdinaMN.gov 11-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Roadways •Replacement of curb & gutter (partial or entire) •New roadbed and pavement surface www.EdinaMN.gov 12-A 8/14/2018 3 The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Plan •Approved by City Council in 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders •Incorporates; •- Minimum roadway design elements •- Sidewalk Facilities Plan •- Bicycle Facilities Plan •-Active Routes to School Plan www.EdinaMN.gov 13-C The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Classifications www.EdinaMN.gov 14-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced/installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy www.EdinaMN.gov 15-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Utilities •Localized watermain and service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •Localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Storm sewer upgrades www.EdinaMN.gov 16-A The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website www.EdinaMN.gov 17-A The CITYof EDINA •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Utility Ownership www.EdinaMN.gov 18-C Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service 8/14/2018 4 The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Sidewalks •Based on Sidewalk Facilities Map •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and construction conflicts www.EdinaMN.gov 20-A The CITYof EDINAPrivate Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance •Streetlight upgrades typically not included with project www.EdinaMN.gov 21-A The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Localized flooding during rainfall •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 22-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in yards •Construction equipment stored on streets •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) www.EdinaMN.gov 23-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 5 days to allow driveways to cure •Irrigation and pet fence systems most likely will be damaged www.EdinaMN.gov 24-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •-You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •- Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be seeded www.EdinaMN.gov 25-A 8/14/2018 5 The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •We will; •- Provide opportunities for input •- Keep you informed •- Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs www.EdinaMN.gov 26-A The CITYof EDINACity Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •- Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •- Sanitary sewer •-Watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 27-C The CITYof EDINAPedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •- Sidewalks •- Bike lanes •-Associated signage and pavement markings www.EdinaMN.gov 28-C The CITYof EDINADo Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •- Snowplowing •- Pothole repairs •- Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction www.EdinaMN.gov 29-C Source: Hennepin County website 8/2/2016 The CITYof EDINASpecial Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers 100% of roadway costs (20% on MSA roadways) •- Roadway and driveway removals •- Subgrade materials •-Asphalt pavement •- Restoration www.EdinaMN.gov 30-C The CITYof EDINAResidential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •- Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties www.EdinaMN.gov 31-C ScenarioScenarioScenarioScenario Land UseLand UseLand UseLand Use ClassClassClassClass REU FactorREU FactorREU FactorREU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 B Multi-Family Residential 0.8 8/14/2018 6 The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Chowen Park A&B •308 properties (268 REUs) •2.02 miles of road •Full replacement/installation of curb & gutter •Full replacement of watermain, water services •5’ sidewalk on Beard Avenue www.EdinaMN.gov 32-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Chowen Park A&B •0.42 miles of gravel alleys •New asphalt pavement on existing gravel alleys •0.53 miles of concrete alleys •Repairs may be performed on existing concrete alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 33-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Indian Trails B&C •93 properties (88.01 REUs) •1.1 miles of road •Spot replacement of curb & gutter •- New curb & gutter on Shawnee Circle/ Overholt Pass •Spot replacement of watermain, water services •Possible repair/replacement of retaining walls on Shawnee Circle/Overholt Pass www.EdinaMN.gov 34-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Indian Hills C •16 properties (13.5 REUs) •0.15 miles of road •Spot replacement of curb & gutter www.EdinaMN.gov 35-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details –Todd Park E •7 properties (5.5 REUs) •0.11 miles of road •Installation of new curb & gutter •Spot replacement of watermain, water services •Improvements to storm sewer system www.EdinaMN.gov 36-A The CITYof EDINAPreliminary Assessments *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) www.EdinaMN.gov 37-C Neighborhood Estimated Assessment Range per REU* # of REUs SquareYards of Paving Square Yards of Paving per REU Chowen Park A&B (roadway) $8,000 - $12,100 268.00 27,615 103.04 Chowen Park A&B (alley) $1,100 - $1,900 62.00 2,953 47.63 Indian Trails B&C $14,300 – $19,100 88.01 16,341 185.67 Indian Hills C $9,900 - $13,700 13.50 2,195 162.61 Todd Park E TBD 5.50 992 180.30 8/14/2018 7 The CITYof EDINATypical Project Timeline www.EdinaMN.gov 41-C July – September 2018 Engineering studies/estimates provided December 2018 Public hearings January – March 2019 Plan preparation and bidding April – May 2019 Construction begins October – November 2019 Construction concludes Spring 2020 Warranty work Fall 2020 Final assessment hearing The CITYof EDINAAssessment Timing www.EdinaMN.gov 42-C Initial Public Hearings December 2018 Project Constructed Summer 2019 Final Assessment Hearing October 2020 Assessment Filed with County November 2020 Assessment on Tax Statement January 2021 The CITYof EDINAPayment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance charges •Pay 25%; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years (10 years for alleys) •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years (10 years for alleys) •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older •- Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •- 2016 interest rate was 3.25% •-Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 www.EdinaMN.gov 43-C The CITYof EDINACommunication www.EdinaMN.gov 44-A •Regular Mail -All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires - Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers -Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, paving, temporary inaccessibility) •City Website Project Page The CITYof EDINAProviding Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •-Traffic/pedestrian issues •- Street drainage issues •- Streetlight upgrades •- Sump pump connection options •Public hearing in December 2018 •- Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns www.EdinaMN.gov 45-A The CITYof EDINAQuestionnaire Results www.EdinaMN.gov 46-A Neighborhood Responses Received to Date Chowen ParkA&B 29% (90 / 308) IndianTrails B&C 38% (35 / 93) Indian Hills C 13% (2 / 16) Todd Park E 71% (5 / 7) 8/14/2018 8 The CITYof EDINACity Extra •Free, weekly email updates on project progress and schedules •Best way to stay informed •www.EdinaMN.gov/CityExtra •- Check box next to your project name •If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates upon request www.EdinaMN.gov 47-A The CITYof EDINAHow To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Sign up for City Extra •Ask questions, stay informed www.EdinaMN.gov 48-C The CITYof EDINA Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Contact Us www.EdinaMN.gov 49-A Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449 LMoore@edinamn.gov Andrew Scipioni Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 AScipioni@edinamn.gov The CITYof EDINAQuestions? www.EdinaMN.gov 50-A Thanks for your time! 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 1G ' 2 ge: .,-7-- olv,,,r-A , 3 o ty, , 4 .74' 6 7 „_1:(-( (7/ r CL / ( 8 T75)(D 17/77( 7: 9 "•-ifiZt.:t.5 "75-",)i -i 10 11 4.vr rE ?. 12 i 13 7,< 14 o!o- fr c 15 1:3v 0 16 UO 18 c- _ 19 - 20 ikA g yy 21 22 23 ,, ' 24 , 25 r- c LD- Z.-NAL. 26 27 r& 6 fix re v\ SEWS /11\9011 Ave. c • 28 /). /3-T7 clui G> 76)5) c 29 30 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME i ADDRESS 1 (2/), /4411-, _ ),4C )10,5 2 Com'` I Si --- - 3 MARK- 10,41)04 S-8 t 3 -D124.3n) Ave S'i,„ 4 AL) ei-) 5 i 6 L t_ /2 d__ 7 ":5(/ .I_) zilf Fie ,5-61/}1 /X Sc. 8 L.) ---,-- cl. (--( ._ 0-t u‘e , ,,,„_, 9 -FL,-SA Z E 4ckf i 10 t r - )T0. 11 i i & - LC, 12 56Wo ..(Aril"? Al J`e ) 4' 13 r ? e-). 1//// z-.. ts 14 15 09,") c- 4,0,v ccic„, 16 (9 , So/ \ I 17 , :,-'..)o EA 0 cv 5 - g 2 tt •cics,15 la- Jr& • S 18 -t 2 z.. 19 & 7(-1?(E)---Lta_f _i___ - Cil-t_ 0-t- 20 p, livi, 'U._ ( &(i Pa 21 2 / L- err 2 * ( ef t 1,/ (267 22 23 / 24 -----, .,6 ; i Ve. e 4,- y 4; .' r 25 . ii 0 7 7 ilt,--(-;, 26 -Te (-vz--1-- -C812/ 1 ilac.AJ cati Ar S 27 28 29 30 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 / 4 ( A ,a--(/ s C 2 1 G t / 4 - (-) S 3 `Th`t 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 APPENDIX J Preliminary Roadway Design Letter Todd Park E Street Reconstruction Brookside Terrace Motor Street October 31, 2018 Dear Resident: As a follow up to the August 2, 2018 project workshop held at the Public Works, the preliminary roadway design for Brookside Terrace and Motor Street is included on the back of this letter. The preliminary design combines input from several sources including residents, the Fire Department, the Public Works Department and the Transportation Commission. Please note the following preliminary design details: • The proposed street widths are generally equivalent to the existing street widths. • One-sided parking will be allowed on all streets within the project area. The preliminary estimated assessment range for this project is $10,000 - $13,900 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU). Please see the following table for preliminary estimated assessment ranges for other neighborhoods scheduled for street reconstruction in 2019: 2019 Neighborhood Estimated Assessment Range per REU REUs Square Yards of Paving Square Yards of Paving per REU Chowen Park A&B $8,000 - $12,100 268 27,615 103.04 Indian Hills C $9,900 - $13,700 13.5 2,195 162.61 Indian Trails B&C $14,300 – $19,100 88.01 16,341 185.67 Todd Park E $10,000 - $13,900 5 827 165.4 Chowen Park D (2018)* $9,000 - $16,000 6 933 143.5 *Chowen Park D was similar in scope to Todd Park E (reconstruction of the W 54th St gravel road) City Council will consider this project at the Public Improvement Hearing on December 10, where residents will have an opportunity to ask questions or comment on the proposed project. You will receive another mailed notice of this hearing. If you have questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at 952-826-0443 or aditzler@EdinaMN.gov. Sincerely, Aaron Ditzler, PE Assistant City Engineer \\ed-fs1\engpubwks$\eng\const\imprs\ba454 todd park e_2019\admin\corr\letters\20181031 feasibility design letter.docx APPENDIX K Correspondence from Residents From:Aaron Ditzler To: Cc:; ; Andrew Scipioni; ; Chad Millner Subject:RE: Todd Park E Date:Monday, November 19, 2018 4:56:02 PM Attachments:image001.gif Jim, It’s preferable to center within the right of way. However, if during the design phase there is good reason to shift the roadway one way or the other to avoid impacts to trees, walls, etc. we’ll do that. The design phase won’t begin until receiving City Council authorization. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Jim Welna Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 7:20 PM To: Aaron Ditzler Cc: Baddogantiques@comcast.net; welavender@aol.com; Andrew Scipioni ; pjhedberg@gmail.com; Chad Millner Subject: Re: Todd Park E Aaron, I appreciate you getting back to us with the information on the change to a 20' width for Motor Street. Will the 20' be centered on the City of Edina's right of way for Motor Street? Thank you, Jim Welna -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> To: Jim Welna Cc: <>; <welavender@aol.com>; Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov>; pjhedberg@gmail.com <pjhedberg@gmail.com>; Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Fri, Nov 16, 2018 5:25 pm Subject: RE: Todd Park E Jim, The Todd Park E Engineering Study will include a roadway width recommendation of 20’ for Motor Street instead of the 24’ width referenced in our 10/31/18 letter. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Jim Welna <jimace817@aol.com> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 9:44 AM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: ; ; Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov>; ; Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: RE: Todd Park E Aaron, We will see you Thursday morning at 10:15. Jim Welna Sent from AOL Mobile Mail Get the new AOL app: mail.mobile.aol.com On Monday, November 5, 2018, Aaron Ditzler wrote: Jim, We’ll meet you at the corner of Brookside Terrace and Motor Street on Thursday, 11/8 at 10:15 AM to talk about your discussion items. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Jim Welna Sent: Sunday, November 04, 2018 9:50 AM To: Aaron Ditzler Cc: ; ; Andrew Scipioni ; Subject: Re: Todd Park E Aaron, Thank you for getting back to us. I have talked with our two adjacent neighbors Peter and Lyle. Would it work for you to meet with us this Wednesday from 3 p.m. on or this Thursday from 10 a.m. on? We would like to learn about how this proposed project will solve the underlying issue(s) and discuss the concerns/questions that I listed below. Jim Welna -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> To: Jim Welna > Cc: <>; <>; Chad Millner <cmillner@EdinaMN.gov>; Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> Sent: Fri, Nov 2, 2018 9:33 am Subject: RE: Todd Park E Jim, We’d be happy to have a meeting to talk about your discussion items below. Please provide a few available dates and times and we can meet at the corner of Brookside Terrace and Motor Street. We can discuss available dates and times over the phone if you prefer. Thank you. Aaron Ditzler, Assistant City Engineer952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.govStay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Jim Welna <> Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2018 10:21 PM To: Aaron Ditzler <ADitzler@EdinaMN.gov> Cc: Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov>; Asciponi@EdinaMN.gov; ; Subject: Todd Park E Aaron, We received your October 31st letter today regarding the upcoming Public Improvement Hearing before the City Council scheduled for December 10th. Your letter also contained the preliminary design for the project and broad cost estimates. We were very surprised to receive your letter since the team that came out and met with us earlier indicated that there would be further meetings to discuss what the city's research had found regarding the scope of the project, alternative fixes to the underlying issues, surface materials and width of the surfaces. As far as I know, there have been no further meetings or communication with us since the site visit on Monday, August 6th. Here are items that we would like to discuss with you and our neighbors affected by this proposed project. 1. The three different widths of the surfaces. Motor Street, which has the least traffic, shows the largest width. If a 15' width works north of 44th Street it would seem that south of 44th street could be 15' as well. 2. During the site visit we discussed our interest in having surmountable curbs if the project went forward. I see surmountable curbs on the north side of 44th Street but bulkhead curbs on the south side of 44th Street. 3, It's unclear how costs will be assessed. As you know, our property will have city surfaces on three sides. We would like to know how costs will be assigned in comparison to how other similar properties have been assessed. I also note that Todd Park E is shown as having five REUs. I count a total of six (three on each side of 44th Street.) Please let us know when we can meet with you and our neighbors to follow-up on the first site visit. Thank you, Jim & Sue Welna 1 Liz Moore From:Agnes Semington Sent:Friday, August 3, 2018 3:54 PM To:Andrew Scipioni Subject:Re: 2019 Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction I will call you Thanks! Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2018, at 1:55 PM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Agnes, How about we shoot for 10am on the 10th? Would you prefer that I call you, or you call me? My number is 952-826-0440. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Agnes Semington [mailto: Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2018 3:45 PM To: Andrew Scipioni Subject: Re: 2019 Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction Hi there I do have time on 10th I am free 10-noon, if any time during that block might work Regards Agnes Sent from my iPhone On Aug 2, 2018, at 9:35 AM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Agnes, I can certainly share our high-level estimates once we have them; at the latest, they will be completed by August 13. Unfortunately, my Friday recently filled up with a last-minute project; might sometime next Friday work (the 10th)? Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Agnes Semington Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2018 7:06 AM 2 To: Andrew Scipioni Subject: Re: 2019 Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction Thanks Andrew This was very informative I would like to go to the hearings. Is it possible to share the high level estimates via email? My work schedule is such that I cannot make that time work for a call. I have a lot of Tim on Friday Aug 3rd Let me know Regard Agnes Sent from my iPhone On Jul 27, 2018, at 3:03 PM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Agnes, We can certainly schedule a time to discuss the project further. Please let me know if there are certain dates/time next week that work well for you for a phone call. I may also be available to meet in-person between 3:30 and 5, if that works better for your schedule. We are still preparing estimates for all of next year’s proposed projects, and are aware that cost will be particularly significant for this project due to the low number of impacted homeowners. We plan to have these estimates in time for the open house meeting mid-August. One of the aspects of the project that we want to discuss with the adjacent residents is the width of the street. Brookside Terrace currently sits in a 40-foot-wide right-of-way (meaning the City owns 40’ of land between the residential property lines on the east side and the railroad property line on the west side). The street currently is about 22’ wide; our typical newly-constructed streets are 24-28’ wide. Some factors that will play a role in determining the width are the demand for on-street parking in the neighborhood (on-street parking would require a wider road section) and construction impacts (location of utility poles, driveway grades, retaining walls, trees, etc.) Regardless of the width, we are planning to construct the new road entirely with the existing right- of-way. At this point, this project is simply being proposed by staff as part of our Pavement Management Program. This fall, we will have an engineering study prepared that will detail the scope of work and the estimated costs and assessments for City Council to consider. Council will consider the project at a Public Hearing, where residents will be able to provide comments and/or ask questions about the project before Council votes on whether or not to approve the project. The date and time of these meetings will be sent to all affected residents through the mail. 3 Again, let me know what dates/time work best for you to discuss further. I appreciate your time and look forward to hearing your thoughts on the project. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Agnes Semington [mailto: Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 10:03 PM To: Andrew Scipioni Subject: 2019 Todd Park E Neighborhood Reconstruction Hi Andrew The Date/Time of the meeting does not work for me. Should we schedule a call to discuss some of my questions and to get additional information? I would like to get an estimate of the tax assessment that would be given to each homeowner impacted. If you make the road wider - will that extra space come from our property, or from the property across the street. I thought that land was also owned by the railroad. I guess my biggest concern is how much this will cost, considering only 7 houses are impacted and the number of items listed on the letter sent are extensive. Is this something that is already decided, or is it under consideration and may not happen. I work, so weekday meetings are hard. Regards Agnes Semington 1 Liz Moore From:Andrew Scipioni Sent:Wednesday, April 18, 2018 3:31 PM To:'Andrew Vick' Subject:RE: Brookside Terrace & 5120 Property questions Attachments:Curb Styles.pdf Andrew (I apologize, I couldn’t recall if you prefer Andrew or Andy), Thank you for your call today about the upcoming Todd Park E project. This area is still scheduled to be reconstructed in 2019, which means we will be collecting more information and making decisions about the scope of the work this summer (summer 2018). An informational meeting is tentatively scheduled for July 2018, where property owners in all 2019 project areas will be updated with the proposed scope of the projects and given an estimated range of assessment costs. As I mentioned over the phone, the primary challenge with unique projects such as this is balancing the goals and objectives of the City with the needs and desires of the residents. Among the City’s objectives are; To provide a cost‐effective roadway surface that minimizes required maintenance activities and prolongs the interval between major reconstruction projects To provide a sufficient roadway width for emergency vehicles to reach adjacent properties To effectively manage stormwater runoff in ways that improve drainage, minimize flooding risk and promote water quality To replace/repair critical public utility infrastructure (fire hydrants, watermains, sanitary sewer, etc.) as necessary to extend their lifecycle and reduce required maintenance To install infrastructure for non‐motorized transportation (bike lines, sidewalks, trails, etc.) as recommended by the City’s Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan (https://www.edinamn.gov/494/Pedestrian‐Bicycle‐Master‐Plan) (given the context of the roadways within this project area, no new sidewalks or bike facilities are currently recommended) To implement Living Streets design components (where feasible) as they relate to street design, traffic calming, landscaping and lighting (https://www.edinamn.gov/542/Living‐Streets) From previous experiences on street reconstruction projects, I find the primary desires of residents are, in general; To minimize disturbance to lawns and private property located within the ROW To maintain a sufficient roadway width for travel and parking, as is necessary (parking demand varies significantly from project to project) To improve conditions at intersections to promote pedestrian and motorist safety To maintain existing trees and other vegetation as much as possible With unique projects like these, it will be easier for us to develop some design options once we have a better understanding of what the desires of the residents are. To that extent, if you are interested in acting as a “neighborhood captain” for this project or if you’re already engaged with you neighbors, feel free to pass any comments or questions along to me or encourage your neighbors to do so themselves. For that West 54th Street project I mentioned to you, we had a separate meeting with just those residents that served as a workshop to explain what our objectives were and to learn what they wanted to see come out of the project. While we weren’t able to meet everyone’s expectations, we did incorporate some of the resident feedback into our design (street width, on‐street parking allotments and the extent of our proposed tree removal). We are certainly open to having a similar meeting for this project if there is interest among the residents. Attached are some maps and pictures of previous project areas in town that differed from our typical street section. These are some options that we have available to us in planning the reconstruction of Brookside Terrace and Motor 2 Street. I would strongly encourage you and our neighbors to stop by some of these areas to get a sense for what you like or do not like. Personally, I always find it much more beneficial to physically see something rather than rely on a photograph. If there’s any other information I can provide you, or if you have any further comments or questions about the project prior to our July meeting, feel free to reach out. Also, let me know if you feel that a smaller‐scale meeting for just this project would be beneficial and we can start to plan accordingly. Thank you for your proactive involvement in this project, and we look forward to discussing it further with yourself and your neighbors. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov Stay informed! Sign up for City Extra emails! From: Andrew Vick [mailto Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 12:28 PM To: Andrew Scipioni Subject: Re: Brookside Terrace & 5120 Property questions Thanks Andrew! Talk soon. . Andrew Vick Sent from my iPhone On Aug 25, 2017, at 3:44 PM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Andrew, I don’t recall if I’ve sent this to you already or not, but attached is the presentation that was given this year to all properties affected by 2018 reconstruction. We hold this meeting every year to inform residents what to expect during the construction process. This has some of the answers to your questions, but here are the rest; 1) Yes, that is exactly how the corner lots, like yours, are treated under our current assessment policy. 2) Yes, bituminous is another word for asphalt or blacktop. All of our reconstructed roadways (bituminous, concrete, or gravel) are reconstructed with bituminous. 3) Crosswalks are generally not assumed as part of reconstruction projects. New crosswalks are typically included only to replace existing crosswalk markings or for areas with high pedestrian traffic. As our Public Works crews have to maintain all crosswalk markings on Edina streets, they prefer that we only install crosswalk markings where they are most needed. That being said, after a project is completed, re can conduct a traffic safety request to determine if a crosswalk meets our warrants for installation. In other words, it is more cost‐effective for us to rebuild the roads and then determine where crosswalks are warranted rather than install them at every intersection by default. 4) Per our Living Street Plan, Brookside Terrace is classified as a Local street, which has a recommended design width of 27’ if there is no sidewalk. If a Local street has a sidewalk, the recommended width is 24’. These have been our standards for the last 3 years. We do occasionally go smaller than 24’, but these are typically areas where there are extreme 3 construction limits or very limited traffic volumes. The smallest width we can construct is 20’ in order to accommodate our fire engines. For 27’ widths, we typically allow 2‐sided parking; 24’ width with sidewalks are allowed 1‐sided parking, and widths smaller than 24’ have no parking. On‐street parking determinations are made based on these criteria and the context of the roadway within a neighborhood. 5) We typically would look at constructing a turn‐around, as flat dead‐ends are not preferred for emergency services and snow plows. However, the right‐of‐way along this roadway is on 40’ wide, and our typical cul‐de‐sac is 70’ wide. Construction of a cul‐de‐sac would require a permanent easement over private property. 6) The map I provided to you shows the right‐of‐way limits within the project (Hennepin County’s Interactive Property Map is a great recourse to view property information and ROWs; https://gis.hennepin.us/property/map/default.aspx). While 4355 and 4359 Brookside Ave currently do not access Brookside Terr, they do touch the existing right‐of‐way and so are included in the proposed project area. As we get further along in the design of this project next summer, we will determine if it is feasible to extend Brookside Terr to reach these two properties. If it is not, they will be removed from the project limits and not included in the assessment roll. 7) Our options for existing retaining walls include relocating them, removing them and regrading behind them, or replacing them. When we do depends a lot on the existing topography, right‐of‐ way limits, and proposed utility improvements. Our preference is to install curb & gutter along the entire edge of the roadways in order to provide a continuous functional conduit for stormwater runoff. 8) Generally in areas where all new curb is being installed, all existing driveway aprons are removed and replaced. A portion of the existing driveways are then removed and replaced in order to tie into the new driveway aprons. During design, we analyze the proposed roadway cross‐sections in order to determine how far back into driveways we have to remove to match into the new street. 9) By “sewer cap,” do you mean a sump pump or downspout discharge? 10) A public hearing is scheduled the fall/winter prior to construction. where Engineering staff presents their proposed improvements and associated costs. The Public is then allowed to give comments and ask questions directly to Council. Per Minnesota State Statute, any assessed public improvement must be approved by the City Council by a 4‐1 vote. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: Andrew Vick [mailto Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 2:42 PM To: Andrew Scipioni Subject: Re: Brookside Terrace & 5120 Property questions Andrew, Thanks for all this helpful information, as I love seeing how other parts of the city team works. Working with the photography side of the Living Streets community proposal has been fun for me professionally, crazy that it might now affect my own home. Wow, Brookeside Terrace already in 2019?! I just have a few clarifying follow-up questions for you for our 5120 W 44th Street property. Thanks so much for your time, and I understand none of the answers you give are at all promises, more trends or customary protocol guesstimates. Some I hope are easy! 4 1) From your research based on our corner address, you would assume that a project like this would be .5 unit. So if per your document 1 unit share is for example $5,000, we would be looking at $2,500? Is that how that works? 2) "Bitumous streets" is black like what you laid on the new roads on Division Street near Todd park? 3) Are crosswalks assumed like you did along 44th? Nice work! 4) How wide would you assume a stretch like this to be? Is there a standard, or simply keep with the spacing at the current curb entrance? I would guess no parking allowed as current width would not allow for that? 5) We are on a dead end. Would there be an option for considering a small culdisac turnaround that could be allowed for parking? 6) On your map you show a property #4359. Presently just the three lots are connected and Brookside Terrace stops abruptly before #4373. The map seems off otherwise the proposed concept is to connect two more properties. Please clarify. 7) What have been standard practices when a massive bolder retaining wall has existed? No concrete curb and just tar that portion? 8) Just this spring we had an apron poured as we were told at the time there was no imminent plan for Brookside Terrace. What has been practice with this? Tying it in? 9) I see we have a sewer cap but there is no drainage needed as all slopes towards 44th. How does this work in the new road? 10) How does a project get approved to more ahead? Majority vote of the properties affected? How can we help rally support or what would you suggest? Let me know your best guesses at this time. It will help us rethink how we wrap up our house project and what to prioritize for now knowing 2019 comes fast. Cheers, Andrew Vick Owner & Lead Photographer On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@edinamn.gov> wrote: Andrew, Sorry I missed your call. Our Streets Supervisor Shawn Anderson can be reached at 952- 826-0313 or sganderson@edinamn.gov. I should also mention that your street is currently schedule to be reconstructed in 2019 (see attached project area map). As part of this project, we are anticipating replacing the 5 existing gravel roads with bituminous streets with concrete curb & gutter, as well as performing localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer systems in the area. We will be holding an open house related to this and other proposed construction projects sometime in September, to which you will receive a letter informing you of the date. Traditionally, given that this street is scheduled for reconstruction in the near future, our Public Works crews would not perform any drastic maintenance between now and the reconstruction; however, Shawn can take a look at the street to determine if they need to perform temporary repairs to get us by until 2019. If you have any other questions about the upcoming reconstruction project, feel free to contact me. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov 1 Liz Moore From:Jacob Smith Sent:Thursday, September 28, 2017 8:41 AM To:Carter Schulze Subject:Re: 4437 brookside terrace Carter, Thanks for sending the info. There is at least one neighbor that thinks she speaks for everyone. I am sure she would be the same one that would not want to manage the upkeep and snow removal on the road. Megan and I own a property in northern mn with a true country lane and it can be expensive to maintain and is a painful process to collect payment from the 5 other property owners that have a right to use it. We have another issue on Brookside Terrace that I can't believe the watershed has not brought up. Every time we get a hard rain the gravel sediment washes out of our street and into the creek. If I can help you or the process in any way please let me know. Thanks so much, Jake and Megan Jacob Smith On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> wrote: Jacob, I’ve attached the presentation from Monday night. Just an FYI, there were several neighbors in attendance very much against improving any of this area. Carter Schulze, Assistant City Engineer 952-826-0443 | Fax 952-826-0392 CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: Jacob Smith [mailto Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 12:44 PM To: Carter Schulze <CSchulze@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 4437 brookside terrace Carter, Please send me the presentation for next week. If I can help with anything please let me know. Thanks, Jake 1 Liz Moore From:Andrew Scipioni Sent:Friday, August 25, 2017 3:45 PM To:'Andrew Vick' Subject:RE: Brookside Terrace & 5120 Property questions Attachments:20170731 Info Meeting 2018 Projects.pdf Andrew, I don’t recall if I’ve sent this to you already or not, but attached is the presentation that was given this year to all properties affected by 2018 reconstruction. We hold this meeting every year to inform residents what to expect during the construction process. This has some of the answers to your questions, but here are the rest; 1) Yes, that is exactly how the corner lots, like yours, are treated under our current assessment policy. 2) Yes, bituminous is another word for asphalt or blacktop. All of our reconstructed roadways (bituminous, concrete, or gravel) are reconstructed with bituminous. 3) Crosswalks are generally not assumed as part of reconstruction projects. New crosswalks are typically included only to replace existing crosswalk markings or for areas with high pedestrian traffic. As our Public Works crews have to maintain all crosswalk markings on Edina streets, they prefer that we only install crosswalk markings where they are most needed. That being said, after a project is completed, re can conduct a traffic safety request to determine if a crosswalk meets our warrants for installation. In other words, it is more cost‐effective for us to rebuild the roads and then determine where crosswalks are warranted rather than install them at every intersection by default. 4) Per our Living Street Plan, Brookside Terrace is classified as a Local street, which has a recommended design width of 27’ if there is no sidewalk. If a Local street has a sidewalk, the recommended width is 24’. These have been our standards for the last 3 years. We do occasionally go smaller than 24’, but these are typically areas where there are extreme construction limits or very limited traffic volumes. The smallest width we can construct is 20’ in order to accommodate our fire engines. For 27’ widths, we typically allow 2‐sided parking; 24’ width with sidewalks are allowed 1‐sided parking, and widths smaller than 24’ have no parking. On‐street parking determinations are made based on these criteria and the context of the roadway within a neighborhood. 5) We typically would look at constructing a turn‐around, as flat dead‐ends are not preferred for emergency services and snow plows. However, the right‐of‐way along this roadway is on 40’ wide, and our typical cul‐de‐sac is 70’ wide. Construction of a cul‐de‐sac would require a permanent easement over private property. 6) The map I provided to you shows the right‐of‐way limits within the project (Hennepin County’s Interactive Property Map is a great recourse to view property information and ROWs; https://gis.hennepin.us/property/map/default.aspx). While 4355 and 4359 Brookside Ave currently do not access Brookside Terr, they do touch the existing right‐of‐way and so are included in the proposed project area. As we get further along in the design of this project next summer, we will determine if it is feasible to extend Brookside Terr to reach these two properties. If it is not, they will be removed from the project limits and not included in the assessment roll. 7) Our options for existing retaining walls include relocating them, removing them and regrading behind them, or replacing them. When we do depends a lot on the existing topography, right‐of‐way limits, and proposed utility improvements. Our preference is to install curb & gutter along the entire edge of the roadways in order to provide a continuous functional conduit for stormwater runoff. 8) Generally in areas where all new curb is being installed, all existing driveway aprons are removed and replaced. A portion of the existing driveways are then removed and replaced in order to tie into the new driveway aprons. During design, we analyze the proposed roadway cross‐sections in order to determine how far back into driveways we have to remove to match into the new street. 9) By “sewer cap,” do you mean a sump pump or downspout discharge? 2 10) A public hearing is scheduled the fall/winter prior to construction. where Engineering staff presents their proposed improvements and associated costs. The Public is then allowed to give comments and ask questions directly to Council. Per Minnesota State Statute, any assessed public improvement must be approved by the City Council by a 4‐1 vote. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov From: Andrew Vick [mailto: Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 2:42 PM To: Andrew Scipioni Subject: Re: Brookside Terrace & 5120 Property questions Andrew, Thanks for all this helpful information, as I love seeing how other parts of the city team works. Working with the photography side of the Living Streets community proposal has been fun for me professionally, crazy that it might now affect my own home. Wow, Brookeside Terrace already in 2019?! I just have a few clarifying follow-up questions for you for our 5120 W 44th Street property. Thanks so much for your time, and I understand none of the answers you give are at all promises, more trends or customary protocol guesstimates. Some I hope are easy! 1) From your research based on our corner address, you would assume that a project like this would be .5 unit. So if per your document 1 unit share is for example $5,000, we would be looking at $2,500? Is that how that works? 2) "Bitumous streets" is black like what you laid on the new roads on Division Street near Todd park? 3) Are crosswalks assumed like you did along 44th? Nice work! 4) How wide would you assume a stretch like this to be? Is there a standard, or simply keep with the spacing at the current curb entrance? I would guess no parking allowed as current width would not allow for that? 5) We are on a dead end. Would there be an option for considering a small culdisac turnaround that could be allowed for parking? 6) On your map you show a property #4359. Presently just the three lots are connected and Brookside Terrace stops abruptly before #4373. The map seems off otherwise the proposed concept is to connect two more properties. Please clarify. 7) What have been standard practices when a massive bolder retaining wall has existed? No concrete curb and just tar that portion? 8) Just this spring we had an apron poured as we were told at the time there was no imminent plan for Brookside Terrace. What has been practice with this? Tying it in? 9) I see we have a sewer cap but there is no drainage needed as all slopes towards 44th. How does this work in the new road? 10) How does a project get approved to more ahead? Majority vote of the properties affected? How can we help rally support or what would you suggest? Let me know your best guesses at this time. It will help us rethink how we wrap up our house project and what to prioritize for now knowing 2019 comes fast. Cheers, Andrew Vick 3 On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Scipioni <ascipioni@edinamn.gov> wrote: Andrew, Sorry I missed your call. Our Streets Supervisor Shawn Anderson can be reached at 952-826-0313 or sganderson@edinamn.gov. I should also mention that your street is currently schedule to be reconstructed in 2019 (see attached project area map). As part of this project, we are anticipating replacing the existing gravel roads with bituminous streets with concrete curb & gutter, as well as performing localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer systems in the area. We will be holding an open house related to this and other proposed construction projects sometime in September, to which you will receive a letter informing you of the date. Traditionally, given that this street is scheduled for reconstruction in the near future, our Public Works crews would not perform any drastic maintenance between now and the reconstruction; however, Shawn can take a look at the street to determine if they need to perform temporary repairs to get us by until 2019. If you have any other questions about the upcoming reconstruction project, feel free to contact me. Andrew Scipioni, EIT, Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 | Fax 952-826-0392 ascipioni@EdinaMN.gov | EdinaMN.gov APPENDIX L Signs 89:z 4373 4366 4380 4350 4359 4386 4351 5101 4377 4412 5107 5225 4367 4369 4373 4416 4401 4404-08 4376 4378 4371 4375 4355 4375 4504 51315120 4381 4429 4425 5135 51164508 5139 4385 4383 4500 4505 44174421 4384 4413 4425 4401 5243 4374 4372 4368 4370 4501 4380 5010 4425BROOKSIDE AVEW 44TH ST BROOKSIDE CT BROOKSIDE TERRMOTOR ST PROJECT LIMITS PROJECT LIMITS City of Saint Louis Park City of Edina / Engineering DeptJuly 2018 SignsTodd Park E NeighborhoodRoadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-454CITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPORA T E D1888 ,e Signs D3-X1 89:z W14-1 APPENDIX M Preliminary Assessment Roll TODD PARK E NEIGHBORHOOD RROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-454 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PID Owner House No.Street Assessable REU Assessable Amount 1 28-117-21-21-0011 Patricia Bowles 4373 Brookside Ter 1 11,700.00$ 2 28-117-21-21-0012 Pete E Semington 4375 Brookside Ter 1 11,700.00$ 3 28-117-21-21-0060 Peter Hedberg/Alda Moettus 5131 Motor St 1 11,700.00$ 4 28-117-21-21-0059 Lyle E Hoofnagle/Diana K Hedges 5135 Motor St 1 11,700.00$ 5 28-117-21-21-0006 Keith K & Elizabeth A Keller 5107 W 44th St 0 -$ 6 28-117-21-21-0013 Andrew J Vick 5120 W 44th St 0.5 5,850.00$ 7 28-117-21-21-0017 James J Welna 5139 W 44th St 0.5 5,850.00$ Total 5 58,500.00$ ENGINEERING STUDY INDIAN HILLS C NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION Gleason Terrace, Saint Albans Circle IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-455 NOVEMBER 26, 2018 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 42003 11-26-18 Aaron Ditzler Reg. No. Date Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 2 SUMMARY: The project involves reconstruction of local bituminous streets, spot replacement of existing concrete curb and gutter and localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer systems in the neighborhood. The estimated total project cost is $379,200. The estimated roadway construction cost is $179,550 and will be funded through special assessments at a rate of approximately $13,300 per residential equivalent unit (REU). Utility improvements amount to $119,650 and will be funded through the City’s utility funds. INITIATION: The project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City’s Neighborhood Reconstruction Program, identified in the Capital Improvement Plan. The project complies with the City’s Living Streets Policy, as well as Vision Edina’s mission statement to “provide effective and valued public services” and “maintain a sound public infrastructure.” This project addresses updating substandard infrastructure with improvements associated with the roadway condition, watermain system, storm sewer system, sanitary sewer system and pedestrian facilities. LOCATION: The project includes Gleason Terrace and Saint Albans Circle. A detailed location map of the project is shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Project Area Map Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadways The roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed between 1969 and 1978 (see Photo 1). Photo 1: Indian Hills C Neighborhood, 1971 The streets in the neighborhood have concrete curb and gutter. The average roadway width is 30’ (measured from the face of curb to the face of curb). A recent geotechnical evaluation of the project area performed by Braun Intertec showed the roadway section varies from 2.5” to 4.5” of pavement over a gravel, silty sand and clayey sand base. As part of the City’s Pavement Management Program, all streets are regularly evaluated and rated on a scale from 1 to 100; 100 representing a brand-new road surface and 0 being extremely poor. This rating is referred to as the Pavement Condition Index (PCI), and is determined based on existing conditions and defects (alligator cracking, raveling, potholes, etc.). The average PCI for the City of Edina is Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 4 72 and the average PCI for Indian Hills C is 14. An example of the current pavement condition can be seen in Photo 2. Photo 2: Existing Pavement Condition Traffic and Crash Data Given the location and context of this project, staff has not measure traffic volumes or speeds. It is assumed that volumes and speeds within the project area are comparable to most local streets in the City (≤500 vehicles per day, 85th percentile speeds ≤30 miles per hour). Crash data for this project is shown in Appendix A. Multi-Modal Transportation There are no pedestrian or bicycle facilities within the project area (see Appendices B and C). There are sidewalks on Gleason Road immediately adjacent to the project area. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer system consists of 9” vitrified clay pipe (VCP) and 8” ductile iron pipe (DIP) installed between 1969 and 1978. Historical records indicate there have been few sewer back-ups or blockages in the area (see Appendix D). Watermain The watermain system consists of 6” DIP and 1.5” copper pipe installed between 1969 and 1978. The overall system has experienced relatively few breaks (see Appendix D). The fire hydrants are original to the neighborhood. Storm Sewer The storm sewer system is located within the legal boundaries of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The system consists of 12” polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC) and 12”-15” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) installed between 1969 and 1978. Both streets within the project limits drain to the east and eventually discharge into Nine Mile Creek. Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 5 Private Utilities Gas, electric, communications and cable utilities are present in the neighborhood. These utilities are underground facilities located in backyards or along the boulevards. Street lighting consists of standard “traditional” lights mounted on fiberglass and wooden poles located throughout the project area as shown in Appendix E. DESIGN INPUT: City Council 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan This plan, part of the draft 2018 Comprehensive Plan, was developed to guide the City’s efforts to create a comprehensive pedestrian and bicycle network. As shown in Appendices B and C, there are no proposed pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the project area. 2015 Living Streets Policy This policy balances the needs of motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The City will apply the Policy to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or change in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. The Living Streets Plan includes 15 principles to guide implementation of the Policy, divided into four categories: All Users and All Modes, Connectivity, Context Sensitivity and Sustainability. Below is a summary of how these principles are incorporated into this project: All Users and All Modes – This project will improve mobility and access to the transportation network for a variety of users, including pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled. Replacement of the pavement surfaces and traffic control signage will enhance safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity – This project involves maintaining a transportation system that can accommodate all modes of travel. Context Sensitivity – Engineering strives to preserve and protect natural features within or adjacent to construction sites where feasible, including trees, waterways and sensitive slopes. Residents within the project area were invited to complete a questionnaire soliciting input on project design components, including multi-modal transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems. Sustainability – Engineering works closely with Public Works to implement infrastructure improvements with consideration of lifecycle costs and future maintenance. The new roadway section can be easily maintained long-term with the use of proactive rehabilitation treatments, which will significantly extend the life of the pavement. Construction operations are required to use the smallest footprint necessary to complete the work; this includes utilizing trenchless technologies, such as pipe bursting or cured-in-place pipe liners. This project will also reduce inflow and infiltration of clean water into the sanitary sewer system, minimizing regional Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 6 wastewater treatment, reducing the risk of sewage surcharges and limiting the risk of back-ups to residential properties. Relevant portions of the Living Streets Plan can be found in Appendix F. 2018 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan The CWRMP did not identify any areas of flood inundation within the project area for either the 10-percent or 1-percent-annual-chance flood event (also referred to as the 10-year and 100-year frequency event, respectively). Potential manhole surcharging was also identified in the 1-percent and 10-percent-annual-chance events. Staff Public Works A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Public Works Department. They supported replacement of fire hydrants and gate valves within the project area, along with localized improvements to the sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems. Police and Fire A draft engineering study was provided to the City’s Police and Fire departments. The Fire Department supports watermain improvements, including adding fire hydrants as necessary to meet public safety standards. They also noted that temporary fire hydrants should be of a consistent style for ease of access, and that emergency access should be maintained at all times during construction. Edina Transportation Commission Prior to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) regular meeting on October 25, 2018, a draft engineering study was provided for review. A question was raised as to why this project is not being combined with a larger neighborhood. Staff likely will combine multiple roadway reconstruction projects into common contracts to obtain more competitive bid prices. Relevant minutes from the ETC meeting are included in Appendix G. Residents As part of the Engineering Department’s practice of notifying residents 2-3 years prior to a potential reconstruction project, residents were invited to an open house on September 25, 2017. Materials from this meeting are available upon request. On June 4, 2018, residents were asked to complete a questionnaire, soliciting feedback on motorized and non-motorized transportation, street lighting and local drainage problems within the project area. The questionnaire was completed by 2 of 16 property owners, a return rate of 13%. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in Appendix H. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on August 13, 2018 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood and others proposed for construction in 2019. The meeting was attended by two residents representing two properties within the project area. Materials from this meeting can be found in Appendix I. Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 7 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvements acknowledge many of the comments and concerns raised by residents throughout the information gathering process, while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of Engineering, Public Works and other City staff. Roadways Typical Section The bituminous roadways are proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. Due to an existing lack of aggregate base, recycling the existing pavement for use as base material in the new roadways is not practical. Instead, 8” of aggregate material will be hauled in, graded and compacted as the base layer prior to placement of 2.5” of bituminous base and 1.5” of bituminous wear course. Unsuitable subgrade materials will be replaced as necessary to provide adequate support for the new roadbed. The reconstructed sections will meet the requirements of a minimum 20-year pavement design life based on projected traffic loadings. Parking The City’s Living Streets Policy evaluates on-street parking based on classification, adjacent land uses, existing demand and costs of construction and maintenance. As the land use in this neighborhood is residential, and given the existing demand for parking, staff believes that two-sided parking on all roadways within the project area is appropriate. Roadway Signage All street signs within the project area, including street name blades, will be replaced to improve visibility and reflectivity (see Appendix E). All new signs shall conform to the standards of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Multi-Modal Transportation There are no proposed pedestrian or bicycle facilities within the project area. All adjacent pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer main has been televised, and portions will be repaired using a combination of open cut and cured-in-place-pipe (CIPP) methods. These repairs will address the issues of sags, cracks and groundwater infiltration into the sewer main. The manhole castings will also be removed and replaced to reduce inflow and infiltration of stormwater. Watermain Echologics, LLC was hired by the City to perform a non-invasive pipe condition assessment on the watermain within the project area and staff has reviewed historical break data to determine the extent of improvements needed. All gate valves and fire hydrants within the project area will be replaced and, if needed, additional hydrants will be installed to meet current public safety standards. The Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 8 new fire hydrants will include the Storz nozzle fittings desired by the Edina Fire Department for quick connection of fire hoses. Storm Sewer Based on existing conditions and the limited scope of utility work, only damaged or non-functioning portions of the curb and gutter will be replaced. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. Sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Private Utilities Staff met with representatives of several private utility companies on October 12, 2018 to notify them of the proposed 2019 reconstruction projects and discuss preliminary improvements. Portions of the private utility networks may receive upgrades prior to construction; however, this work is not part of the City’s project. Currently, the City does not have a standard to determine where and when street lighting should be improved. Unlike other infrastructure improvements, lighting can be installed at a later date with minimal disturbance through the use of trenchless technologies. The lighting in the neighborhood is sufficient to delineate the intersections; therefore, staff is recommending no revisions to the current street lighting. RIGHT-OF-WAY /EASEMENTS: Existing right-of-way in this neighborhood varies from 50’ to 60’. It is anticipated that the majority of this project can be constructed within existing ROW. Many properties have vegetation, boulders, retaining walls or other landscaped items within the City right-of-way. A portion of these landscape items will interfere with some of the proposed infrastructure improvements and will need to be removed in order to complete the necessary work. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $379,200 (see Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical, and construction finance costs from the start of the project to the final assessment hearing. Item Amount Total Cost Funding Source Roadway Total: $ 179,550 Special Assessments Sanitary Sewer $ 32,160 Watermain $ 72,910 Storm Sewer $ 94,580 Utility Total: $ 199,650 City Utility Funds Project Total: $ 379,200 Table 2: Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: Assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties pursuant to Chapter 429 of the Minnesota State Statues. Based on the City’s Special Assessment Policy, there are 13.5 residential equivalent units (REUs) in the Indian Hills C project area. The estimated assessment per REU is $13,300 (see Figure 5). Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 9 Figure 5: Preliminary Assessment Map The formulas for calculating REUs are described below: Single-Family Residential Corner Lots 6608, 6612 and 6632 Gleason Terrace; 6200 and 6201 Saint Albans Circle; = 0.5 REU (partial access off Gleason Road) All other properties are single-family residential located entirely within the project area and will be subjected to an assessment of 1 REU. The preliminary assessment roll can be found in Appendix J. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule outlines the past and future tasks to be performed related to the project: Neighborhood Open House (all 2019/2020 projects) September 25, 2017 Neighborhood Informational Meeting (all 2019 projects) August 13, 2018 ETC Engineering Study Review October 25, 2018 Receive Engineering Study December 4, 2018 Public Improvement Hearing December 10, 2018 Bid Opening March/April 2019 Award Contract/Begin Construction Spring 2019 Complete Construction Fall 2019 Final Assessment Hearing October 2020 Engineering Study Indian Hills C Neighborhood Reconstruction BA-455 November 26, 2018 10 RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes the project can be completed during the 2019 construction season. Staff believes the construction of this project is feasible, cost effective and necessary to improve the public infrastructure in the Indian Hills C neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Crash Data B. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities C. City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities D. Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks E. Streetlights and Signs F. Living Streets Plan G. Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes H. Resident Questionnaire I. Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials J. Preliminary Assessment Roll APPENDIX A Crash Data Indian Hills C Crash Data Location Severity Year Month Time A Property Damage - Collision with Motor Vehicle 2007 November 2:49 p.m. APPENDIX B City Comprehensive Plan Update – Pedestrian Facilities Map Braemar Golf Course Bredesen Park Rosland Park Pamela Park Lewis Park Highlands Park Walnut Ridge Park Todd Park Garden Park Heights Park Van Valkenburg Park Fred Richards Golf Course Creek Valley Park Lake Edina Park Krahl Hill Normandale Park Weber Field Park Arneson Acres Park Countryside Park Alden Park Utley Park Yorktown Park Wooddale Park Arden Park York Park Cornelia Park Strachauer Park Fox MeadowPark Edinborough Park KojetinPark McGuirePark BirchcrestPark SherwoodPark Melody LakePark Williams Park ChowenPark St. John'sPark TingdalePark BrowndalePark GrandviewSquare FrankTupa Park Courtney Fields ?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y Mud Lake )y ?ÞA@ ?úA@ LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake Minnehaha Creek N in e Mi le Cree k Nine Mile Creek Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDVERNON AVEFRANCE AVE SXERXES AVE SCAHILL RD70TH ST W 66TH ST W YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD MALONEY AVE 44 T H S T W 50TH ST W 54TH ST W 58TH ST W GLEASON RD70TH ST W 76TH ST W DEWEY HILL RD VALLEY VIEW RD VALLEY VIEW RD MINNESOTA DR78TH ST W / Engineering DeptMay 2018 Pedestrian Facilities Proposed FacilitiesExisting Facilities Existing Sidewalk Existing Park Pathway Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail New Primary Sidewalk New Secondary Sidewalk New Shared Use Path Upgrade to Shared Use Path Twin Loops Facility APPENDIX C City Comprehensive Plan Update – Bicycle Facilities Map ?ÞA@ )y ?úA@ Mud Lake LakeEdina Mirror Lake Lake Cornelia ArrowheadLake HighlandsLake IndianheadLake Melody Lake LakePamela HawkesLake Harvey Lake Centennial Lake AldenPark VanValkenburgPark FoxMeadowPark HighlandsPark Todd Park Weber FieldParkKojetinPark BrowndalePark WooddaleParkWilliamsParkUtleyPark FrankTupaPark SherwoodPark ArdenPark YorkPark ChowenPark PamelaParkSt JohnsPark StrachauerPark RoslandPark BristolParkCorneliaPark ArnesonAcresPark LakeEdinaParkFred RichardsGolf Course YorktownPark EdinboroughPark GardenPark MelodyLakePark TingdalePark CountrysidePark BredesenPark WalnutRidgePark KrahlHill Creek Valley Park HeightsPark NormandalePark McGuirePark LewisParkBraemar Park and Golf Course(Courtney Fields) Minnehaha Creek Ni ne M ile C re e k Nine Mile Creek Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBlake RdVernon AveFrance Ave SXerxes Ave SCahill Rd70th St W Interlachen Blvd Maloney Ave 4 4 th S t W 50th St W 54th St W 58th St W Gleason Rd70th St W 76th St W Dewey Hill Rd Valley View Rd Valley View Rd Minnesota Dr78th St W Wooddale AveTracy AveParklawn AveConcord AveBenton Ave Gle a s o n R dMalibu RdGreen Farms RdMcCauley Trl SMirror Lakes DrLincoln DrWashington AveDivision St Vernon AveGolf Ter Code AveWilryan AveNormandale RdWest Shore DrCornelia DrFrance Ave SYork Ave S77th St WOhms LnHilary Ln Olinger Blvd 66th St W Antrim Rd63rd St W Xerxes Ave S69th St W Bush Lake RdMetro Blvd66th St W 62nd St W Valley Ln Brookside Ave?úA@ ?ÞA@ )y 74th St W V alley View R dEngineering DeptMay 2018 / O:\Users\engineering\Projects\Bicycle_Facilities_Asbuilts.mxd Proposed Bicycle Facilities New Shared Use Path Upgrade to Shared Use Path Standard Bike Lane New Buffered Bike Lane Upgrade to Buffered Bike Lane Neighborhood Slow Street Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Twin Loops Facility APPENDIX D Sewer Blocks and Watermain Breaks 66326624 6716 6601 6609 6704 6705 6605 6816 6600 6600 6621 6620 6308 6713 6625 6616 6709 6716 6604 6620 6800 6200 6608 6612 6528 6712 6608 6216 6628 67016204 6608 6709 6616 6215 6720 6633 6613 6537 6713 6612 6212 66006605 6705 6732 6528 6705 6208 6721 66026213 6803 6520 6525 6524 6724 6728 6521 6772 6709 6717 6524 6617 6629 6613 6604 6713 6621 6625 6605 6201 6517 6606 6521 6209 6717 6609 6525 6205 6609 6201 6225 652662056217620962216533 6701 PROJECT LIMITS GLEASON TER ST ALBANS CIR G L E A S O N R D VALLEY VIEW RD / Engineering DeptOctober 2018 Sewer Blocks and Watermain BreaksIndian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-455CITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPOR A T E D1888 ,e Sewer BlocksWatermain Breaks APPENDIX E Streetlights and Signs 66326624 6716 6601 6609 6704 6705 6605 6816 6600 6600 6621 6620 6308 6713 6625 6616 6709 6716 6604 6620 6800 6200 6608 6612 6528 6712 6608 6216 6628 67016204 6608 6709 6616 6215 6720 6633 6613 6537 6713 6612 6212 66006605 6705 6732 6528 6705 6208 6721 66026213 6803 6520 6525 6524 6724 6728 6521 6772 6709 6717 6524 6617 6629 6613 6604 6713 6621 6625 6605 6201 6517 6606 6521 6209 6717 6609 6525 6205 6609 6201 6225 652662056217620962216533 6701 PROJECT LIMITS GLEASON TER ST ALBANS CIR G L E A S O N R D VALLEY VIEW RD / Engineering DeptJuly 2018 StreetlightsIndian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-455CITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPORA T E D 1888 ,e Xcel EnergyTraditionalFiberglass Xcel EnergyTraditionalWood Square Xcel EnergyTraditionalWood Square 89:z!"$ 89:z !"$ 66326624 6716 6601 6609 6704 6705 6605 6816 6600 6600 6621 6620 6308 6713 6625 6616 6709 6716 6604 6620 6800 6200 6608 6612 6528 6712 6608 6216 6628 67016204 6608 6709 6616 6215 6720 6633 6613 6537 6713 6612 6212 66006605 6705 6732 6528 6705 6208 6721 66026213 6803 6520 6525 6524 6724 6728 6521 6772 6709 6717 6524 6617 6629 6613 6604 6713 6621 6625 6605 6201 6517 6606 6521 6209 6717 6609 6525 6205 6609 6201 6225 652662056217620962216533 6701 PROJECT LIMITS GLEASON TER ST ALBANS CIR G L E A S O N R D VALLEY VIEW RD / Engineering DeptJuly 2018 SignsIndian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway ReconstructionImprovement No. BA-455CITYOFEDINAMIN N ESOTAINCORPORA T E D 1888 ,e Signs !"$R1-1 89:z W14-1 APPENDIX F Living Streets Plan Living Streets Plan 2015 Safety Health Choice Economy 8 2. Living Streets Policy INTRODUCTION The Living Streets Policy was developed to provide the framework for a Living Streets Plan. The policy initially stood alone and included sections to guide the creation of the Living Street Plan. This revised policy is now an integral part of the Living Streets Plan. The Living Streets Policy ties directly to key community goals outlined in the City’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Those goals include safe walking, bicycling and driving; reduced storm water runoff, reduced energy consumption, and promoting health. The Living Streets Policy also compliments voluntary City initiatives such the “do.town” effort related to community health, Tree City USA and the Green Step Cities programs related to sustainability. In other cases, the Living Streets Policy will assist the City in meeting mandatory requirements set by other agencies. The Living Streets Policy is broken up into three parts: Vision, Principles and Implementation. The Policy is followed by a description of core services provided by the City of Edina that are related to or implemented in part through Living Streets. POLICY Living Streets balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, enhance community identity, create economic vitality, improve environmental sustainability, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. The Living Streets Policy defines Edina’s vision for Living Streets, the principles Living Streets will embody, and the plan that will guide implementation of their construction. LIVING STREETS VISION Edina is a place where ... • Transportation utilizing all modes is equally safe and accessible; • Residents and families regularly choose to walk or bike; • Streets enhance neighborhood character and community identity; • Streets are safe, inviting places that encourage human interaction and physical activity; • Public policy strives to promote sustainability through balanced infrastructure investments; • Environmental stewardship and reduced energy consumption are pursued in public and private sectors alike; and • Streets support vibrant commerce and add to the value of adjacent land uses. Mini Fact Expect cyclists on the road. Watch for cyclists on the road. Treat them as you would any slow-moving vehicle. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 9 LIVING STREETS PRINCIPLES Fifteen principles guide implementation of the Living Streets Policy in the areas of all users and all modes, connectivity, context sensitivity and sustainability. The City will incorporate these principles when planning for and designing the local transportation network and when making public and private land use decisions. All Users and All Modes Principle 1: Living Streets are high-quality transportation facilities that meet the needs of the most vulnerable users such as pedestrians, cyclists, children, seniors and the disabled; and Principle 2: Living Streets provide access and mobility for all transportation modes while enhancing safety and convenience for all users. Connectivity Principle 3: The City designs, operates and maintains a transportation system that provides a highly connected network of streets that accommodate all modes of travel; Principle 4: The City seeks opportunities to overcome barriers to active transportation by preserving and repurposing existing rights-of-way and adding new rights- of-way to enhance connectivity for pedestrians, bicyclists and transit; Principle 5: The City prioritizes improvements to non-motorized connections to key destinations such as public facilities, public transit, the regional transportation network and commercial areas; Principle 6: The City will require new developments to provide interconnected street and sidewalk networks that connect to existing or planned streets or sidewalks on the perimeter of the development; and Principle 7: Projects will include consideration of the logical termini by mode. For example, the logical termini for a bike lane or sidewalk may extend beyond the traditional limits of a street construction or reconstruction project, in order to ensure multimodal connectivity and continuity. Context Sensitivity Principle 8: Living Streets are developed with input from stakeholders and designed to consider neighborhood character and promote a strong sense of place; Principle 9: Living Streets preserve and protect natural features such as waterways, urban forest, sensitive slopes and soils; Principle 10: Living Streets are designed and built with coordination between business and property owners along commercial corridors to develop vibrant commercial districts; Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 10 Principle 11: Living Streets coordinate with regional transit networks and regional authorities; and Principle 12: The City will consider the fiscal context of projects and potential financial impacts when implementing Living Streets at the project level. Sustainability Principle 13: Living Streets will improve the current and future quality of life of the public, Principle 14: Living Streets will reduce environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of roadways; and Principle 15: The City will increase the life span and resilience of its infrastructure and will build infrastructure with consideration for lifecycle costs and ease of maintenance. LIVING STREETS IMPLEMENTATION The City of Edina will develop Living Streets in the regular course of business of maintaining, expanding or redeveloping the road network and will be guided by the Vision and Principles established above. Implementation will happen predominantly through the neighborhood street reconstruction program, but also though specific stand-alone stormwater utility, pedestrian, bicycle or safety projects. Project prioritization is not specifically part of the Living Streets Plan. Prioritization of projects takes place in the City’s Capital Improvement Program and Budget and is determined by the City Council with guidance from the Living Streets Vision and Principles. The City will actively promote and apply the Living Streets Policy and Plan by: • Applying the Living Streets Policy and Plan to all street projects, including those involving operations, maintenance, new construction, reconstruction, retrofits, repaving, rehabilitation or changes in the allocation of pavement space on an existing roadway. This also includes privately built roads, sidewalks, paths and trails. • Drawing on all sources of transportation funding and actively pursuing grants, cost-sharing opportunities and other new or special funding sources as applicable. • Through all City departments supporting the vision and principles outlined in this Plan in their work. • By acting as an advocate for Living Streets principles when a local transportation or land use decision is under the jurisdiction of another agency. Projects that implement Living Streets will be guided by pedestrian and cyclist network plans and roadway classifications and will consider the physical, social, ecologic, regulatory and economic context in a given project area. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 11 The project delivery system used to build Living Streets will: • Systematically engage Edina residents and project stakeholders to better inform project-level recommendations. • Keep Edina residents and project stakeholders informed about Living Streets and the range of services they help provide. • Follow minimum Living Streets design requirements and standards. • Manage construction impacts to residents and users of streets. Network The creation of a Living Streets network of road, pedestrian and bicycle facilities provides mobility, accessibility and access to people, places and spaces. The resulting interconnection of neighborhoods links people to goods and services and to one another, and increases quality of life for those who live in, work in, or visit the city. Existing and planned transportation networks are identified in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan and other approved/adopted plans. Network plans include: • Roadway Network (Functional Classification, Jurisdictional Classification) • Sidewalk Facilities • Bicycle Facilities (Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan) • Active Routes to School Comprehensive Plan • Transit Service Network plans are approved by the City Council. In most cases, modification requires an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. The expansion, creation and improvement of pedestrian and bicycle networks will be well planned and prioritized: • Expansion of existing networks and providing connections to key traffic generators or destinations provide immediate benefit to all network users and is a top priority. • Network connections serving vulnerable users such as children, seniors and the disabled are a top priority. • Network connections serving high-volume uses such as schools, retail destinations or regional public transit are a top priority. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 12 Context Contextual variety can either constrain or create opportunity in roadway and other infrastructure projects. The following are contexts that will be considered and will influence the planning, design and implementation of Living Streets. Exceptions Living Streets principles will be included in all street construction, reconstruction, repaving and rehabilitation projects, except under one or more of the conditions listed below. City staff will document proposed exceptions as part of a project proposal. • A project involves only ordinary maintenance activities designed to keep assets in serviceable condition, such as mowing, cleaning, sweeping, spot repair, concrete joint repair or pothole filling, or when interim measures are implemented on a temporary detour. Such maintenance activities, however, shall consider and meet the needs of bicyclists and pedestrians. CONTEXTS OF LIVING STREETS Ecological Water resource, ponds, wetlands, lakes, streams Natural resouces, trees, and urban forest Air quality Climate Sun and shade Materials, waste, energy, sustainability Regulatory State Aid roadway Watershed rules Operational Maintenance operations Traffic control or functional constraints Project Type Public Neighborhood street reconstruction Neighborhood street reconstruction with major associated utility work State Aid street reconstruction Stand-alone sidewalk, bicycle or utility project Public partner lead State County Transit agency Parks district Private development Will remain private Future public Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 13 • The City exempts a project due to an excessively disproportionate cost of establishing a bikeway, walkway or transit enhancement as part of a project. • The City determines that the construction is not practically feasible or cost effective because of significant or adverse environmental impacts to waterways, flood plains, remnants or native vegetation, wetlands or other critical areas. • Available budget is constrained or project timing allows more efficient construction at a later date. Engagement Members of the public have an interest in understanding and providing input for public projects. Project recommendations will be developed with a transparent and defined level of public engagement. The public will have access to the decision-making process and decision makers via public meetings and other correspondence and will be provided the opportunity to give input throughout the process. Project reports will discuss how their input helped to influence recommendations and decisions. The City of Edina’s Living Streets will continue to engage and solicit public input as a vital component of the project implementation process. See Chapter 5 for a more detailed discussion regarding the purpose of and opportunities for public engagement. Design The guidelines contained in the Living Streets Plan will be used to direct the planning, funding, design, construction, operation and maintenance of new and modified streets, sidewalks, paths and trails. The guidelines allow for context-sensitive designs. The Design Guidelines (see Chapter 6): • Keep street pavement widths to the minimum necessary. • Provide well-designed pedestrian accommodation in the form of sidewalks or shared-use pathways on all arterial, collector and local connector streets. Sidewalks shall also be required where streets abut a public school, public building, community playfield or neighborhood park. Termini will be determined by context. • Provide frequent, convenient and safe street crossings. These may be at intersections designed to be pedestrian friendly, or at mid-block locations where needed and appropriate. • Provide bicycle accommodation on all primary bike routes. • Allocate right-of-way for boulevards. • Allocate right-of-way for parking only when necessary and not in conflict with Living Streets principles. • Consider streets as part of our natural ecosystem and incorporate landscaping, trees, rain gardens and other features to improve air and water quality. The Design Guidelines in this Plan will be incorporated into other City plans, manuals, rules, regulations and programs as appropriate. As new and better practices evolve, the City will update this Living Streets Plan. Minimum standards will guide how vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle networks interact and share public right of way. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 14 Benchmarks and Performance Measures The ability to measure the performance of a plan, as well as knowing that it is functioning as it is intended, is vitally important to overall success and the ability to sustain it. With this in mind, the City will monitor and measure its performance relative to the Living Streets Policy. Benchmarks that will demonstrate success include: Every street and neighborhood is a comfortable place for walking and bicycling. This does not mean that every street in the city will have walking and biking facilities. It means that each neighborhood will provide a network of these facilities such that walking and biking to and through neighborhoods is a comfortable experience. Every child can walk or bike to school or a park safely. It is essential that alternatives to driving to school or parks be provided to children and their caregivers. These alternatives – walking or bicycling – will be both safe and convenient modes of transportation. See the Edina Active Routes to School Plan for more information. Seniors, children, and disabled people can cross all streets safely and comfortably. Opportunities to cross all streets in Edina, including local, collectors and arterial streets, will be provided. These crossings will be safe and comfortable for all users, regardless of age or ability. An active way of life is available to all. Opportunities for active living should be made available to all members of the Edina community by connecting centers of activity via active, multimodal transportation. Each resident of and visitor to Edina will have the ability to lead an active way of life. There are zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Perhaps the ultimate safety benchmark is zero traffic fatalities or serious injuries. Modeled from the Vision Zero Initiative (www.visionzeroinitiative.com), an aspirational yet primary goal of Living Streets is to achieve this high level of safety on the City’s roadways. Reduce untreated street water flows into local waterways and reduce storm water volume. Cost-effective stormwater best management practices (BMPs) are strategically selected to go above and beyond regulatory requirements to provide for flood protection and clean water services through the use of infrastructure that retains, settles, filters, infiltrates, diverts or reduces the volume of stormwater that flows to local surface waters. Retail streets stay or become popular regional destinations. Part of Edina’s Living Streets vision is that “streets support vibrant commerce.” While most of the city’s streets are residential, Edina’s business districts are a vital part of the community. The benefits of Living Streets extend to retail streets as well, making them more attractive to businesses and consumers alike. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy 15 The City will draw on the following data to measure performance: • Number of crashes or transportation-related injuries reported to the Police Department. • Number and type of traffic safety complaints or requests. • Resident responses to transportation related questions in resident surveys. • Resident responses to post-project surveys. • The number of trips by walking, bicycling and transit (if applicable) as measured before and after the project. • Envision ratings from the Institute for Sustainable Infrastructure. • Additional performance measures may be identified as this Policy is implemented. Mini Fact Motorists must stop behind all crosswalks. Living Streets Plan – 2. Living Streets Policy APPENDIX G Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Transportation Commission Community Conference Room October 25, 2018 I. Reports/Recommendations A. 2019 Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Draft Engineering Studies Assistant City Engineer, Aaron Ditzler, addressed the ETC’s questions and discussed the 2019 neighborhood reconstruction projects. The following comments were made: • Indian Hills o A concern over this project being a standalone and not being combined with a previous project was raised since we are combing the Indian Trails projects. TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME Ahler, Mindy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Johnson, Kirk 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Iyer, Surya 1 1 2 100% LaForce, Tom 1 1 2 100% Kane, Bocar 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Miranda, Lou 1 1 2 100% Olson, Larry 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Richman, Lori 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Ruthruff, Erik 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Scherer, Matthew 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 90% Veluvali, Shankar 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 80% Emmanual Ayelomi (s) 1 1 2 100% Yeukai Zimbwa (s) 1 1 2 100% Jenny Ma (s) 1 1 1 1 1 5 50% Tessa Yeager (s) 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 60% APPENDIX H Resident Questionnaire 50.00%1 50.00%1 Q1 Does your property have drainage issues the City should know about?Examples: History of flooding/standing water, grading, backyard drain, nuisance sump pump, etc. Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 #PLEASE COMMENT ON THE TYPES PROBLEMS YOU HAVE:DATE 1 Flooding from parking lot of St Albans Church 6/11/2018 4:43 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 1 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 50.00%1 50.00%1 Q2 How concerned are you with the speed of traffic in your neighborhood or on your street? Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 2 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%2 100.00%2 Q3 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Gleason Road from 62 to Valley View Road 6/19/2018 1:25 PM 2 Gleason road 6/11/2018 4:43 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 Too many speeding cars up and down hill. There a lot of children walking along the street.6/19/2018 1:25 PM 2 Rolling through the stop signs so not to have to slow down 6/11/2018 4:43 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 3 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 100.00%2 0.00%0 Q4 How concerned are you with the volume of traffic or the number of vehicles in your neighborhood or on your street? Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 4 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%2 100.00%2 Q5 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Gleason Road from 62 to Valley View Road 6/19/2018 1:27 PM 2 Gleason Road 6/11/2018 4:49 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 During evening rush hour the the traffic is backed up all the way from Valley View Road to 62 on many days. 6/19/2018 1:27 PM 2 Has become a cutoff during rush hour 6/11/2018 4:49 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 5 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 0.00%0 100.00%2 Q6 How concerned are you with motorist behavior in your neighborhood? (Examples of poor motorist behavior include speeding, rolling through stop signs, failing to yield and driving aggressively.) Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Not Concerned Concerned Very Concerned 6 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%2 100.00%2 Q7 If concerned or very concerned, please enter the location(s) and describe why you feel that way. Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 #LOCATION OF ISSUE:DATE 1 Gleason Road from 62 to ValleyView Road 6/19/2018 1:30 PM 2 Valley View and Gleason 6/11/2018 4:51 PM #WHY IS IT AN ISSUE OF CONCERN?DATE 1 Unsafe activity: speeding - which in the winter results frequently in loss of control due to icy roads 6/19/2018 1:30 PM 2 Rolling stops at a pedestrian crosswalk with students crossing 6/11/2018 4:51 PM ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Location of issue: Why is it an issue of concern? 7 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 0.00%0 100.00%2 Q8 In general, these behaviors impact you most when you are: Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging or running 8 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 50.00%1 50.00%1 Q9 Do you feel that any intersection in your neighborhood is unsafe? Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 #IF YES, WHICH INTERSECTION?DATE There are no responses. Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 9 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 0.00%0 100.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q10 Which, if any, of the following factors contribute to your feeling that the intersection is unsafe? (select all that apply) Answered: 1 Skipped: 1 Total Respondents: 1 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE There are no responses. Lack of traffic cont... Issues with sight lines ... Drivers failing to s... Drivers failing to... Drivers turning corn... Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Lack of traffic control (traffic signal, stop sign, yield sign) Issues with sight lines or clear view Drivers failing to stop at stop sign Drivers failing to yield Drivers turning corner too fast Lack of marked crosswalk Street(s) too wide Insufficient Lighting Other (please specify) 10 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 0.00%0 100.00%1 Q11 In general, the intersection feels most unsafe when you are: Answered: 1 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 1 Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging,... 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Driving Bicycling Walking, jogging, running 11 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 50.00%1 50.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q12 How frequently do you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood? Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 12 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%2 50.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q13 If you walk, jog or run in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 Total Respondents: 2 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE There are no responses. Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) t... Travel to/from destination... Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Health/exercise Exercise dog(s) Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 13 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q14 If you don't walk, jog or run in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Answered: 0 Skipped: 2 #RESPONSES DATE There are no responses. 14 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 0.00%0 100.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q15 How frequently do you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood? Answered: 1 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 1 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 15 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 100.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q16 If you ride a bicycle in your neighborhood, what are your primary reasons for doing so? (select all that apply) Answered: 1 Skipped: 1 Total Respondents: 1 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE There are no responses. Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) t... Travel to/from destination... Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Health/exercise Accompany child(ren) to destination (such as school or park) Travel to/from destination (such as store, coffee shop) Commute to/from work Access transit Can't drive or don't own car Other (please specify) 16 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q17 If you don't ride a bicycle in your neighborhood as often as you would like, what factors contribute to that? Please list all that you can think of. Answered: 0 Skipped: 2 #RESPONSES DATE There are no responses. 17 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 50.00%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 50.00%1 Q18 How frequently do you or a member of your household park on the street? Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Very frequently... Frequently (2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 18 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 50.00%1 0.00%0 50.00%1 0.00%0 Q19 How frequently do visitors to your household park on the street? Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 Very frequently... Frequently(2-3 times p... Occasionally (1-4 times p... Rarely (less than once pe... Never 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very frequently (daily or near daily) Frequently (2-3 times per week) Occasionally (1-4 times per month) Rarely (less than once per month) Never 19 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 0.00%0 100.00%2 0.00%0 0.00%0 0.00%0 Q20 How satisfied are you with the availability of on-street parking in your neighborhood? Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 #ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ABOUT PARKING?DATE There are no responses. Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Very satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied 20 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q21 Please tell us anything else you would like us to know about existing traffic or street conditions in your neighborhood. Answered: 0 Skipped: 2 #RESPONSES DATE There are no responses. 21 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire 50.00%1 50.00%1 Q22 Do you favor improving the streetlights in your neighborhood (residential streetlights are funded by special assessment)? Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 2 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 The lighting should shine down and not up at the night sky 6/11/2018 4:56 PM Yes No 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No 22 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q23 Street Number Answered: 1 Skipped: 1 #RESPONSES DATE 1 6209 6/11/2018 4:59 PM 23 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire Q24 Street name Answered: 2 Skipped: 0 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Gleason Terrace 6/19/2018 1:33 PM 2 St Albans 6/11/2018 4:59 PM 24 / 24 Indian Hills C Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Resident Questionnaire APPENDIX I Neighborhood Informational Meeting Materials 8/14/2018 1 The CITYof EDINA 2019 Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting August 13, 2018 The CITYof EDINAAgenda •Introductions •Why Reconstruct •What You Can Expect •Funding Sources •Project Scopes •Timeline •Communication •How to Prepare •Q&A www.EdinaMN.gov 2-C The CITYof EDINA2019 Projects •Chowen Park A & B – 308 properties •Indian Trails B & C – 93 properties •Indian Hills C – 16 properties •Todd Park E – 7 properties www.EdinaMN.gov 3-C The CITYof EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4-A Introductions Director of Assistant Engineering Transportation Engineering City Engineer Services Manager Planner Engineering Technicians Chad Ross Mark Tom Andrew DerekMillner Bintner Nolan Haataja Scipioni Northenscold Engineering GIS Water Resources Graduate Traffic SafetyCoordinator Administrator Coordinator Engineer Coordinator Liz Rebecca Jessica Charlie Nick Moore Foster Wilson Gerk Bauler Jon Drew Moore Torgerson The CITYof EDINA •Proactive Pavement Management Program •Streets grouped into neighborhoods •- Extends pavement life •- Maximizes economics of scale •Prioritized based on; •- Pavement condition •-Age of original construction •- Underground utility issues www.EdinaMN.gov 5-A Why My Street? The CITYof EDINAWhy Reconstruct? •Originally constructed in 1910s-1990s (20-100 years old) •Utility issues to address beneath roadway •More cost-effective than other maintenance strategies (mill & overlay, seal coat) www.EdinaMN.gov 6-A 8/14/2018 2 The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Roadways •Pavement reaching end of useful life •Most streets have curb and gutter •Many properties already have concrete driveway aprons www.EdinaMN.gov 7-A The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions -Alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 8-A •Concrete and gravel •Some areas have storm sewer •Concerns about required maintenance (snow plowing operations) The CITYof EDINAExisting Conditions - Utilities •Watermain - Loss in pipe wall thickness - Main and service breaks - Undersized mains www.EdinaMN.gov 9-C •Sanitary Sewer - Inflow and infiltration - Cracks, breaks, sags, etc. •Storm Sewer - Structure deficiencies - Undersized pipes - Curb and gutter failing The CITYof EDINA •Mailboxes •Irrigation systems and pet fences •Landscaping •Outwalks/steps Existing Conditions – Right-of-Way www.EdinaMN.gov 10-C The CITYof EDINAWhat/Where is the ROW? •Surface and space above and below public roadways used for travel purposes and utilities •Typically 60’ width •(MSA Streets 66’) •Property corners located during survey www.EdinaMN.gov 11-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Roadways •Replacement of curb & gutter (partial or entire) •New roadbed and pavement surface www.EdinaMN.gov 12-A 8/14/2018 3 The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Plan •Approved by City Council in 2015 •Balances needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders •Incorporates; •- Minimum roadway design elements •- Sidewalk Facilities Plan •- Bicycle Facilities Plan •-Active Routes to School Plan www.EdinaMN.gov 13-C The CITYof EDINALiving Streets Classifications www.EdinaMN.gov 14-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Driveways •Aprons will be replaced/installed to comply with City standards •Special driveway materials •Reimbursement Policy www.EdinaMN.gov 15-C The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Utilities •Localized watermain and service replacements •New fire hydrants and gate valves •Localized sanitary sewer repairs and rehabilitation •Storm sewer upgrades www.EdinaMN.gov 16-A The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements – Sump Drain •Homeowners encouraged to connect to City Sump Drain •Notification will be given when connecting is available •Sump connection permit available thru City website www.EdinaMN.gov 17-A The CITYof EDINA •Recommend inspecting private services prior to construction •Repairs/upgrades can be coordinated with street work •Associated costs can be added to special assessment Utility Ownership www.EdinaMN.gov 18-C Resident Owned Utilities B –Water Service C & D – Sanitary Service 8/14/2018 4 The CITYof EDINAProposed Improvements - Sidewalks •Based on Sidewalk Facilities Map •Final design evaluated based on network consistency and construction conflicts www.EdinaMN.gov 20-A The CITYof EDINAPrivate Utilities •Gas, Electric, Telephone, Cable may upgrade or repair their utilities before construction begins •Potential City-required relocations •Goal: streamline projects and minimize neighborhood disturbance •Streetlight upgrades typically not included with project www.EdinaMN.gov 21-A The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Dust, mud, noise, and vibrations •Localized flooding during rainfall •Occasional delays due to inclement weather •Residents will be asked to limit water use occasionally •Homes may be connected to temporary watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 22-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Construction materials stored temporarily in yards •Construction equipment stored on streets •5-10 feet of disturbance behind back of curb •Tree removals as necessary (property owners notified) www.EdinaMN.gov 23-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Driveways and roads will be periodically inaccessible •Driveways will be inaccessible for 5 days to allow driveways to cure •Irrigation and pet fence systems most likely will be damaged www.EdinaMN.gov 24-C The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •Items within the City’s right-of-way may be damaged •-You can remove plants and other landscape features before the project •- Irrigation and pet fences will be repaired •Disturbed areas will be seeded www.EdinaMN.gov 25-A 8/14/2018 5 The CITYof EDINAWhat You Can Expect •We will; •- Provide opportunities for input •- Keep you informed •- Do our best to minimize inconveniences •Our contractor will accommodate residents with special access needs www.EdinaMN.gov 26-A The CITYof EDINACity Utility Funds •Collection of utility service charges paid to the City •Covers 100% of: •- Storm sewer (curb and gutter, driveway aprons, sump drain pipe) •- Sanitary sewer •-Watermain www.EdinaMN.gov 27-C The CITYof EDINAPedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund •Revenue from Xcel and CenterPoint Energy franchise fees •Promotes non-motorized transportation throughout the City •Covers 100% of: •- Sidewalks •- Bike lanes •-Associated signage and pavement markings www.EdinaMN.gov 28-C The CITYof EDINADo Taxes Cover Street Projects? •~20% of property taxes go to the City for expenses including Police, Fire, Parks, and Public Works •- Snowplowing •- Pothole repairs •- Other street maintenance (sealcoating, overlays, patch repairs) •Taxes do not pay for street reconstruction www.EdinaMN.gov 29-C Source: Hennepin County website 8/2/2016 The CITYof EDINASpecial Assessments •Assigned to benefitting properties of public improvements •Covers 100% of roadway costs (20% on MSA roadways) •- Roadway and driveway removals •- Subgrade materials •-Asphalt pavement •- Restoration www.EdinaMN.gov 30-C The CITYof EDINAResidential Equivalent Units •Assessments distributed based on REUs •- Factor used to compare properties to a single-family residence •Additional factors for commercial, industrial, and public-use properties www.EdinaMN.gov 31-C ScenarioScenarioScenarioScenario Land UseLand UseLand UseLand Use ClassClassClassClass REU FactorREU FactorREU FactorREU Factor A Single-Family Residential 1.0 B Multi-Family Residential 0.8 8/14/2018 6 The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Chowen Park A&B •308 properties (268 REUs) •2.02 miles of road •Full replacement/installation of curb & gutter •Full replacement of watermain, water services •5’ sidewalk on Beard Avenue www.EdinaMN.gov 32-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Chowen Park A&B •0.42 miles of gravel alleys •New asphalt pavement on existing gravel alleys •0.53 miles of concrete alleys •Repairs may be performed on existing concrete alleys www.EdinaMN.gov 33-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Indian Trails B&C •93 properties (88.01 REUs) •1.1 miles of road •Spot replacement of curb & gutter •- New curb & gutter on Shawnee Circle/ Overholt Pass •Spot replacement of watermain, water services •Possible repair/replacement of retaining walls on Shawnee Circle/Overholt Pass www.EdinaMN.gov 34-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details – Indian Hills C •16 properties (13.5 REUs) •0.15 miles of road •Spot replacement of curb & gutter www.EdinaMN.gov 35-A The CITYof EDINAProject Details –Todd Park E •7 properties (5.5 REUs) •0.11 miles of road •Installation of new curb & gutter •Spot replacement of watermain, water services •Improvements to storm sewer system www.EdinaMN.gov 36-A The CITYof EDINAPreliminary Assessments *Residential equivalent unit (1 single-family home = 1 REU) www.EdinaMN.gov 37-C Neighborhood Estimated Assessment Range per REU* # of REUs SquareYards of Paving Square Yards of Paving per REU Chowen Park A&B (roadway) $8,000 - $12,100 268.00 27,615 103.04 Chowen Park A&B (alley) $1,100 - $1,900 62.00 2,953 47.63 Indian Trails B&C $14,300 – $19,100 88.01 16,341 185.67 Indian Hills C $9,900 - $13,700 13.50 2,195 162.61 Todd Park E TBD 5.50 992 180.30 8/14/2018 7 The CITYof EDINATypical Project Timeline www.EdinaMN.gov 41-C July – September 2018 Engineering studies/estimates provided December 2018 Public hearings January – March 2019 Plan preparation and bidding April – May 2019 Construction begins October – November 2019 Construction concludes Spring 2020 Warranty work Fall 2020 Final assessment hearing The CITYof EDINAAssessment Timing www.EdinaMN.gov 42-C Initial Public Hearings December 2018 Project Constructed Summer 2019 Final Assessment Hearing October 2020 Assessment Filed with County November 2020 Assessment on Tax Statement January 2021 The CITYof EDINAPayment Options •Pay entire amount upon receiving bill to avoid finance charges •Pay 25%; balance rolls to property taxes over 15 years (10 years for alleys) •Roll entire amount to property taxes over 15 years (10 years for alleys) •Defer payment if 65 years of age or older •- Finance charges are 1% over City’s borrowing interest rate •- 2016 interest rate was 3.25% •-Assessing Department – 952-826-0365 www.EdinaMN.gov 43-C The CITYof EDINACommunication www.EdinaMN.gov 44-A •Regular Mail -All meetings, public hearings, and questionnaires - Final assessment notices (one year after construction) •Door hangers and flyers -Time-sensitive information (water shut-offs, paving, temporary inaccessibility) •City Website Project Page The CITYof EDINAProviding Input •Questionnaires mailed to your home, weigh in on; •-Traffic/pedestrian issues •- Street drainage issues •- Streetlight upgrades •- Sump pump connection options •Public hearing in December 2018 •- Opportunity for residents to voice comments and concerns www.EdinaMN.gov 45-A The CITYof EDINAQuestionnaire Results www.EdinaMN.gov 46-A Neighborhood Responses Received to Date Chowen ParkA&B 29% (90 / 308) IndianTrails B&C 38% (35 / 93) Indian Hills C 13% (2 / 16) Todd Park E 71% (5 / 7) 8/14/2018 8 The CITYof EDINACity Extra •Free, weekly email updates on project progress and schedules •Best way to stay informed •www.EdinaMN.gov/CityExtra •- Check box next to your project name •If you cannot receive email, we will mail you City Extra updates upon request www.EdinaMN.gov 47-A The CITYof EDINAHow To Prepare •Complete project questionnaire •Begin financial planning •Coordinate home and yard improvement projects around street reconstruction schedule •Sign up for City Extra •Ask questions, stay informed www.EdinaMN.gov 48-C The CITYof EDINA Engineering Department 7450 Metro Boulevard Hours: 7:00 a.m. – 3:30 p.m. 952-826-0371 Contact Us www.EdinaMN.gov 49-A Liz Moore Engineering Coordinator 952-826-0449 LMoore@edinamn.gov Andrew Scipioni Engineering Technician 952-826-0440 AScipioni@edinamn.gov The CITYof EDINAQuestions? www.EdinaMN.gov 50-A Thanks for your time! 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 1G ' 2 ge: .,-7-- olv,,,r-A , 3 o ty, , 4 .74' 6 7 „_1:(-( (7/ r CL / ( 8 T75)(D 17/77( 7: 9 "•-ifiZt.:t.5 "75-",)i -i 10 11 4.vr rE ?. 12 i 13 7,< 14 o!o- fr c 15 1:3v 0 16 UO 18 c- _ 19 - 20 ikA g yy 21 22 23 ,, ' 24 , 25 r- c LD- Z.-NAL. 26 27 r& 6 fix re v\ SEWS /11\9011 Ave. c • 28 /). /3-T7 clui G> 76)5) c 29 30 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME i ADDRESS 1 (2/), /4411-, _ ),4C )10,5 2 Com'` I Si --- - 3 MARK- 10,41)04 S-8 t 3 -D124.3n) Ave S'i,„ 4 AL) ei-) 5 i 6 L t_ /2 d__ 7 ":5(/ .I_) zilf Fie ,5-61/}1 /X Sc. 8 L.) ---,-- cl. (--( ._ 0-t u‘e , ,,,„_, 9 -FL,-SA Z E 4ckf i 10 t r - )T0. 11 i i & - LC, 12 56Wo ..(Aril"? Al J`e ) 4' 13 r ? e-). 1//// z-.. ts 14 15 09,") c- 4,0,v ccic„, 16 (9 , So/ \ I 17 , :,-'..)o EA 0 cv 5 - g 2 tt •cics,15 la- Jr& • S 18 -t 2 z.. 19 & 7(-1?(E)---Lta_f _i___ - Cil-t_ 0-t- 20 p, livi, 'U._ ( &(i Pa 21 2 / L- err 2 * ( ef t 1,/ (267 22 23 / 24 -----, .,6 ; i Ve. e 4,- y 4; .' r 25 . ii 0 7 7 ilt,--(-;, 26 -Te (-vz--1-- -C812/ 1 ilac.AJ cati Ar S 27 28 29 30 2019 NEIGHBORHOOD RECONSTRUCTION INFORMATIONAL MEETING AUGUST 13, 2018 NAME ADDRESS 1 / 4 ( A ,a--(/ s C 2 1 G t / 4 - (-) S 3 `Th`t 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 APPENDIX J Preliminary Assessment Roll INDIAN HILLS C NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-455 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PID Owner House No.Street Assessable REU Assessable Amount 1 06-116-21-41-0039 R & B MC PHERSON 6608 GLEASON TER 0.5 6,650.00$ 2 06-116-21-41-0038 JOHN E & MARY M SAMPSON 6612 GLEASON TER 0.5 6,650.00$ 3 06-116-21-41-0036 BOYANG HONG & RUILING WANG 6616 GLEASON TER 1 13,300.00$ 4 06-116-21-41-0035 D & I KERIN 6620 GLEASON TER 1 13,300.00$ 5 06-116-21-41-0034 D J JUCKNIESS & K JUCKNIESS 6624 GLEASON TER 1 13,300.00$ 6 06-116-21-41-0033 M W HUTTNER & C M HUTTNER 6628 GLEASON TER 1 13,300.00$ 7 06-116-21-41-0032 M C BROOKS & S H BROOKS 6632 GLEASON TER 0.5 6,650.00$ 8 06-116-21-41-0067 M C MCNEELEY & J M MCNEELEY 6200 ST ALBANS CIR 0.5 6,650.00$ 9 06-116-21-41-0075 ELIZABETH B ANDERSON 6201 ST ALBANS CIR 0.5 6,650.00$ 10 06-116-21-41-0068 W H VOSE & K A CAROLAN 6204 ST ALBANS CIR 1 13,300.00$ 11 06-116-21-41-0074 ROY B COWING/MARGOT J COWING 6205 ST ALBANS CIR 1 13,300.00$ 12 06-116-21-41-0069 R JAYASEKERA & HILARY CHART 6208 ST ALBANS CIR 1 13,300.00$ 13 06-116-21-41-0073 VALDIS INDE & DOROTHY K INDE 6209 ST ALBANS CIR 1 13,300.00$ 14 06-116-21-41-0070 M J SCHNAUS & L J SCHNAUS 6212 ST ALBANS CIR 1 13,300.00$ 15 06-116-21-41-0072 CONNIE S NELSON 6215 ST ALBANS CIR 1 13,300.00$ 16 06-116-21-41-0071 GUNJAN SINHA & PUNEET SINHA 6216 ST ALBANS CIR 1 13,300.00$ Total 13.5 179,550.00$ Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.L. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:2019 Commission Work Plans Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the 2019 Commission work plans. INTRODUCTION: Staff comments on 2019 proposed commission work plans were provided on November 7 at the City Council work session. Staff has incorporated council feedback and have submitted work plans for Council approval. There are several cross-commission committees proposed which is a partnership between members of multiple commissions. Each cross-commission committee initiative has a designated Lead Commission. Lead Commissions Role: -Chair/co-chair the committee -Determine committe size -Give final approval of the committee's work Supporting Commission(s) Role: -Serve on the cross-commission committee -Support the work to complete the initiative ATTACHMENTS: Description Energy & Environment Commission Community Health Commission Transportation Commission Parks and Recreation Commission Planning Commission Arts and Culture Heritage Preservation Commission Human Rights & Relations Commission ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION Commission: Energy and Environment Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_8 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs_16__ Promote residential curbside organics recycling by attending local events. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Seeley Progress Report: Initiative # 2 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_60_ ☒ CTS (including Video) 62hrs ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Review and establish an annual Business Recognition Program Award and consult with members of the Human Rights Commission who coordinate the Tom Oye Award. ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Horan Partners: Energy & Environment Commission [LEAD] and Human Rights & Relations Commission [Consult] Progress Report: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION Initiative # 3 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_40_ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs_8___ Review and recommend a building energy benchmarking policy ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Jackson Progress Report: Initiative # 4 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☒☒☒☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_6_ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs_16_ Study and report on pollinator resolution. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Horan Progress Report: Initiative # 5 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☒☒☒☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_32☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs_20_ Study and report about timeline and parameters recommendation for a Climate Action Plan including the city’s leadership role ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Satterlee Progress Report: ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Increase street sweeping, water quality improvements and conservation actions Education and outreach events, Green building policy, Pass an enhanced tree ordinance City owned building energy efficiency COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION Commission: Community Health Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative #1 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☒☒☒☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility Q2 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Research and evaluate current regulations regarding secondhand smoke and tobacco use, specifically in multi-unit housing living situations and other public areas such as restaurant patios. Receive Edina Multi-Unit Housing Resident Survey from Bloomington Public Health regarding smoking preferences/behavior. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Progress Report: Initiative #2 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☒☒☒☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility All of 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Study and report on possible city actions to reduce access and usage of vaping/e-cigarettes for youth. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Progress Report: COMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION Initiative #3 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) to complete requirement for Edina to receive the AARP City Designation. -Complete Walk Audit Took Kit provided by AARP -October Senior Expo and Designation ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Partners: Community Health Commission [LEAD], Human Rights & Relations Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Transportation Commission Progress Report: Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) Statement by City regarding firearm safety or gun violence Local opioid efforts, including Police led take-back programs City-wide mental health assessment Technology and health – social media, isolation, bullying TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Commission: Transportation Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative #1 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility August 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_20_ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs_16__ Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) to review Travel Demand Management (TDM) options and recommend a TDM policy or ordinance for Council consideration. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Bruce McCarthy Partners: Transportation Commission [LEAD] and Planning Commission Progress Report: Initiative #2 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility October 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_8 _ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs _ __ Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to determine if a process is feasible for the Transportation Commission to provide input on transportation-related issues, including traffic study results associated with development/redevelopment. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Lori Richman Partners: Transportation Commission and Planning Commission [LEAD] Progress Report: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Initiative #4 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility September 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_8 _ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs _ 16_ Annually, spring through fall, the commission will coordinate an educational campaign to inform community members about pedestrian, bicycle and motorist safety which will include an annual community event. ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project ((explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Mindy Ahler Progress Report: Initiative #5 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility June 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_12_ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs _ _ Monitor and evaluate the CloverRide circulator service (charge #4) and make recommendations to Council for future service after twelve-month agreement expires (charge #3). ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Larry Olson Progress Report: Initiative #6 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_8 _ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs _ _ Review and comment on PACS Fund allocating process with a race and equity lens. ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project ((explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Progress Report: TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Initiative #7 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to complete requirements for Edina to receive the AARP City Designation. -Complete Walk Audit Tool Kit provided by AARP -October Senior Expo & Designation ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Partners: Community Health Commission [LEAD], Human Rights & Relations Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Transportation Commission Progress Report: Initiative #8 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 10 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to develop a draft plan on Edina Grand Rounds, including wayfinding. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Partners: Parks & Recreation Commission [LEAD] and Transportation Commission Progress Report: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Commission: Parks & Recreation Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative #1 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 5 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs 5 R&E 2.A. Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) to review the naming of a public facility in the Grandview area after the BC and Ellen Yancey. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Partners: Human Rights & Relations Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission [LEAD] Liaison Comments: City Manager Comments: Change language: R&E 2.A. Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) to review the naming of a public facility in the Grandview area after the BC and Ellen Yancey. Charge #3. Progress Report: Initiative #2 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 20 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs 40 R&E 20.B. Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) in partnership with communities of color to identify barriers for participation in programming. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Partners: Human Rights & Relations Commission [LEAD] and Parks & Recreation Commission Progress Report: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Initiative #3 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 10 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) to develop a draft plan on Edina Grand Rounds, including wayfinding. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Partners: Parks & Recreation Commission [LEAD] and Transportation Commission. Progress Report: Initiative #5 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☒☒☒☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility June ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs___20__ Complete a study and report for fields, courts and rinks capacity and utilization from the data provided by staff. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Greg Good, Eileen McAwley, Matt Dahlien and Val Burke Progress Report: Initiative #6 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☒☒☒☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 20 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Investigate possible alternative funding options to support future growth and development of Edina’s parks, programs and green spaces. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Mike Miller, Rick Ites, Pat Willette and Eileen McAwley Progress Report: PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Initiative #7 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 2 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ R&E 21.C Review and comment on the Race and Equity policy statement developed by City staff. ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Progress Report: Initiative #8 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility All of 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to complete requirements for Edina to receive the AARP City Designation. -Complete Walk Audit Tool Kit provided by AARP -October Senior Expo & Designation ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Partners: Community Health Commission [LEAD], Human Rights & Relations Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Transportation Commission Progress Report: Parking Lot Fred Richards Park PLANNING COMMISSION Board/Commission: Planning Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative #1 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Funds not available ☒ Staff Liaison: ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs The Planning Commission is responsible to review all Land Use applications submitted to the City of Edina. Land Use applications include: Variances; Site Plan Review; Sketch Plan Review; Conditional Use Permits; Subdivision; Lot Line Adjustments; Rezoning; and Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Progress Report: Initiative Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility Sent to Met Council by June 30, 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Funds not available ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs Prepare draft of 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update and submit to Council for approval. Progress Report: Click here to enter text. PLANNING COMMISSION Initiative Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility December 30, 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Review and recommend changes, if appropriate, to zoning ordinances, including: • Any recommendations that come out of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. • Establish an impervious surface regulation. • Basement requirement for single family home. (Code currently requires a basement) • One-foot rule (Exception for lots that are required to raise their first floor elevation due to water table issues?) • Two car garage requirement (should we continue to require a 2-car garage?) • Consideration to allow single family homes in an R-2 District, and or secondary dwelling unit in an R-1 District. • Revise PUD Ordinance (Address specifically what the City wants to achieve in allowing a PUD Rezoning.) • Tree Ordinance. Progress Report: Click here to enter text. Initiative Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December 30, 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs____ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) to determine if a process is feasible for the Transportation Commission to provide input on transportation-related issues, including traffic study results associated with development/redevelopment. Lead Commissioners: Partners: Transportation Commission and Planning Commission [LEAD] Progress Report: Click here to enter text. PLANNING COMMISSION NEW Initiative Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility August 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_20_ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs_16__ Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to review Travel Demand Management (TDM) options and recommend a TDM policy or ordinance for Council consideration ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Partners: Transportation Commission [LEAD] and Planning Commission Progress Report: ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION Commission: Arts and Culture Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility May 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 20 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) to review the Public Art Program and recommend a 3-year plan for the program. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Michelle Morgan-Nelsen, Hannah Klein Partners: Arts & Culture Commission [LEAD] and Human Rights and Relations Commission Progress Report: Initiative # 2 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 20 ☒ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs 10 Coordinate the Public Art program for 2019 ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Michelle Morgan-Nelson, Hannah Klein Progress Report: Initiative # 3 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December 2019 2/=== ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 15 ☒ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Hrs. 10 Coordinate a community event to educate the community and enhance the presence of arts and culture in the community. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Russ Rubin, Susan Chandler, Steve Suckow Progress Report: ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION Initiative # 4 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs R&E 18.E. Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to ensure City facility artwork and décor reflects diversity of race and culture. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Partners: Arts & Culture Commission, Human Rights & Relations Commission [LEAD], and Heritage Preservation Commission Progress Report: Initiative # 5 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 20 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Collaborate with City partners to gather input on the community’s needs and potential opportunities for a new Art Center. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Russ Rubin, Susan Chandler, Ann Miller Progress Report: HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Commission: Heritage Preservation Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal-Draft Initiative # 1 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility Ongoing ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: 10Hrs____ ☒ Other Staff: Consultant, Robert Vogel Evaluate and recommend potential properties to be added to the Heritage Preservation eligible landmark list. ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Progress Report: Initiative # 2 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility Ongoing ☒ Funds available ☒ Staff Liaison: 70% of the work of the HPC is reviewing COA’s. 70% of staff’s time for HPC is also relates to COA’s. writes staff reports. ☒ Other Staff Consultant, Robert Vogel: Staff Consultant Vogel Review Certificates of Appropriateness (COA) application for changes to heritage landmark designated properties. ☐ Funds not available Progress Report: Initiative # 3 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility Ongoing ☒ Funds available ☒ Staff Liaison: 20 hours ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff, Consultant Vogel will work on drafting a Plan of Treatment for each property that is designated. Invite owners of determined eligible properties to designate their properties Edina Heritage Landmarks. ☐ Funds not available Progress Report: HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Initiative # 4 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility May ☒ Funds available Funds are included in the Planning Department Budget. ☒ Staff Liaison: 20 hours ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff Select Annual Heritage Preservation Award recipient. ☐ Funds not available Progress Report: Initiative # 5 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility 2019 ☒ Funds available Funds are included in the Planning Department Budget. ☒ Staff Liaison: Staff will assist Consultant Vogel as needed. ☐ CTS (including Video) ☒ Other Staff: Review and comment on survey of the historic Country Club District, including the re-evaluation of the District’s treatment plan. ☐ Funds not available Progress Report: Initiative # 6 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs R&E 18.E. Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to ensure City facility artwork and décor reflects diversity of race and culture. ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Partners: Arts & Culture Commission, Human Rights & Relations Commission [LEAD], and Heritage Preservation Commission Progress Report: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION Commission: Human Rights and Relations Commission 2019 Annual Work Plan Proposal Initiative # 1 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility Q2 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs_1__ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ R&E 8.D. Review and comment on staff developed protocol and procedures for applying a race and equity lens to communication content. ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Nelson/Arseneault Progress Report: Initiative # 2 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs_1__ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ R&E 2.A. Serve on cross-commission committee to review the naming a public facility in the Grandview area after the BC and Ellen Yancey. ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Stringer-Moore/Epstein/Nelson Partners: Human Rights & Relations Commission and Parks & Recreation Commission [LEAD] Progress Report: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION Initiative # 3 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs_3__ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ R&E 18.E. Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) to ensure City facility artwork and décor reflects diversity of race and culture. ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Meek/Stringer-Moore/Kennedy/Moss-Keys Partners: Arts & Culture Commission, Human Rights & Relations Commission [LEAD], and Heritage Preservation Commission Progress Report: Initiative # 4 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility December ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_3__ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ R&E 20.B. Chair/co-chair a cross-commission committee (see partners) in partnership with communities of color to identify barriers for participation in programming. ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Edwards/Waldron/Stringer-Moore Partners: Human Rights & Relations Commission [LEAD] and Parks & Recreation Commission Progress Report: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION Initiative # 5 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility Q2 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs_1__ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ R&E 21.C. Review and comment on the Race and Equity policy statement developed by City staff. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Epstein/Edwards/Arseneault Progress Report: Initiative # 6 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility August ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs_8__ ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Bias Offense Response Plan review to determine if the plan should be broadened to include offenses outside of the state statute’s definition of bias offense. (Review Racial Equity Recommendation 3. A.) ☒ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Kennedy/Nelson/Epstein Progress Report: Initiative # 7 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility April ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs_12_ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Days of Remembrance Event ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Arseneault/Edwards/Moss-Keys/Epstein/Beringer Progress Report: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION Initiative # 8 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒☒☒☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility October ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs_12_ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to complete requirements for Edina to receive the AARP City Designation. -Complete Walk Audit Tool Kit provided by AARP -October Senior Expo & Designation ☐ Funds not available There are not funds available for this project (explain impact of Council approving initiative in liaison comments). Lead Commissioners: Beringer/Edelson/Edwards Partners: Community Health Commission [LEAD], Human Rights & Relations Commission, Parks & Recreation Commission, Transportation Commission Progress Report: Initiative # 9 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☒ Ongoing Responsibility December ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☐ Staff Liaison: Hrs_8_ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ 2019 Tom Oye Award ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Arseneault/Edelson/Kennedy Progress Report: Initiative # 10 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐☐☐☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☒☒☒☒ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☐ New Initiative ☒ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility October ☒ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs_12_ ☒ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Hrs_____ Sharing Values, Sharing Communities (One Event) ☐ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Edelson/Meek/Stringer-Moore/Beringer Progress Report: HUMAN RIGHTS AND RELATIONS COMMISSION Initiative # 11 Council Charge (Proposed Charge Completed by CM) ☐☐☐☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☒☒☒☒ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐☐☐☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐☐☐☐ 4 (Review & Decide) Target Completion Date Budget Required (Staff Liaison) Staff Support Required (Staff Liaison) Initiative Type: ☒ New Initiative ☐ Continued Initiative ☐ Ongoing Responsibility May 2019 ☐ Funds available Funds are available for this project. ☒ Staff Liaison: Hrs 20 ☐ CTS (including Video) ☐ Other Staff: Serve on a cross-commission committee (see partners) to review the Public Art Program and recommend a 3-year plan for the program. ☒ Funds not available Lead Commissioners: Partners: Arts & Culture Commission [LEAD] and Human Rights and Relations Commission Progress Report: Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.) School District Partnership (Stringer-Moore/Meek) Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.M. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:MJ Lamon, Community Engagement Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:2019 Human Services Task Force Funding Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the continuation of funding in 2019 for the Human Services organizations. INTRODUCTION: The 2017 Human Services Task Force provided Council with 2018 funding recommendations. In the second year, staff conducted site visits with each human services organization. The 2019 continuation of funding recommendations are presented in the attached staff report. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2019 Human Services Funding December 4, 2018 Mayor & City Council MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator 2019 Human Services Task Force Funding Information / Background: The City of Edina has provided funding to non-profit organizations who service Edina Residents since 2002. The 2017 Human Services Funding Task Force was comprised of six volunteer Board and Commission Members. The Task Force reviewed each request for proposal, performed organization interviews, and recommended 2018 funding amounts to Council. The 2017 Task Force was led by Jessica Vanderwerff Wilson, Water Resources Coordinator for the City of Edina. In November 2018, staff conducted site visits for the six of Human Services organizations funded in 2018. The goal of the site visit was to review progress on the work plan submitted with the previous year’s RFP and receive an update to authenticate use of the funding. During the site visit, the organization provided highlights/accomplishments for the year. While each organization has made strives to service Edina residents, each of them had their own set of challenges. However, the one challenge they all had in common was housing. Each of the Human Services organizations experienced the need for more affordable housing in our community. Part of the two-year funding process is a reauthorization and approval of the second-year funding for the Human Services organizations. The process for determining the 2019 amounts of the Task Force Funding: 1. Staff conduct site visits of the Human Services recipients and hear highlights and accomplishments for the year. 2. Staff make recommendations to City Council. Recommendations will be made for organizations that demonstrated progress on their work plan submitted with the RFP. 3. Funding amounts are last year’s funding amount plus the percent increase of the approved budgeted amount for the following year. Funds will be disbursed in January of 2019 once singed agreements have been obtained. The funding amount recommendations are detailed in the chart below: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Beacon Interfaith Funding Amount: $13,265 Staff: Davis Parker, Public Grants and Program Evaluation Coordinator Jess Pierce, Simpson’s Program Manager • Beacon Interfaith opened 66 West in May of 2017. The building on France Ave has 39 homes for southwest suburban young adults who have experienced homelessness. • Simpson Housing Services is the on-site service provider for 66 West. • In their first year of opening, 66 West has experienced progress in resident services and resident personal growth. • In education, only 23% of youth who moved in without a high school diploma or GED were engaged in school. Now, 90% of residents without a high school/GED are enrolled or in the process or enrolling in education. • In employment, 23% of incoming residents employed has grown to 77% of current residents employed for a least 60+ days. Cornerstone Advocacy Service Funding Amount: $20,400 Staff: Courtney Poja, Director of Advancement • Cornerstone continues to maintain a crisis line available 24-7 and emergency and long-term housing for survivors of violence. • Presented to 282 Edina High school students and 180 Edina Middle School students this year. Presentation topics include bullying, teen dating, violence, anger, harassment, and sexual exploitation for youth. • This year Cornerstone expanded their clinical therapy and services to include individual counseling, group therapy and other innovative ways to express emotion. One unique program they offer is individual therapy centered around music production and writing lyrics to express emotions. Normandale Center for Healing & Wholeness Funding Amount: $15,300 Staff: Jennifer Monroe, Executive Director • Provided 777 distinct services to 132 Edina residents with a mix of consultation, home visits, classes and workshops. • Strong partnership with Edina Senior Center. • Held an 8-session Matter of Balance workshop, weekly Tai Chi classes, Podiatry and flu shot clinics in Edina. • Provided 87 distinct education workshop and support services to 30 Edina caregivers. Oasis for Youth Funding Amount: $3,060 Staff: Nicole Mills, Executive Director • Focus on basic needs of youth, such as school-base outreach in Edina and Richfield High School. • Partnered with Edina school districts social workers and have office hours at Edina High School. STAFF REPORT Page 3 Senior Community Services Funding Amount: $20,350 Staff: Adele Mehta, Executive Director Deb Taylor, Executive Director • Senior Community Services is a leader in utilizing technology in assisting care takers. • Licensed Social Workers lead a care giving support group. Staff has been leading this at the Edina Senior Center for 5 years. Attendance is increasing. • CareNextion site is a free site available to anyone caring for an individual. CareNextion lists resources available everywhere, including Edina. VEAP Funding Amount: $20,960 Staff: Patty Schulz, Advancement Director John • Launched a Mobile Food Pantry in March of 2018. They provide fresh foods and education about VEAP resources through a decorated bus that meets people where they are. • Continues to maintain volunteer opportunities with small and large groups, called Donate and Do. • Partnered with school districts to provide school supplies to children in schools such as Valleyview and Southview. • Provided shuttle service for seniors in Southaven to the VEAP food shelf. Also maintains food delivery services for other areas of need. • VEAP continues to be a food shelf which is important because food is the first resource people ask for. They also have a well- established social service program. Recommended Action: Staff recommends continuation of funding in 2019 for the Human Services organizations. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.N. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-123: 2019 Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2018-123 approving the 2019 Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees INTRODUCTION: Attached is Resolution No. 2018-123 Approving 2019 Ambulance and Miscellaneous Fire Fees. The ambulance fees as presented by the Fire Department reflect minor changes (3%) to primarily address cost of living increase. No significant changes are recommended this year. The fees that are proposed to change from 2018 to 2019 are in bold. ATTACHMENTS: Description Res 2018-123 Setting 2019 Ambulance and Misc Fire Fees RESOLUTION NUMBER 2018-123 SETTING AMBULANCE AND MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES FOR 2019 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following ambulance service and miscellaneous fire fees for 2019. AMBULANCE FEES Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and/or transportation to a medical facility: 2018 2019 Level 1 - ON SCENE TREATMENT Specialized medical services performed at scene with no transport involved ALS TREATMENT – NO TRANSPORT Admin. Of One or more medications with no transport $488.00 $503.00 Level 2 - MINOR CARE (BLS) BASIC LIFE SUPPORT Vital Signs, Splinting, Bandaging $1,676.00 $1,562.00 Level 3 - MODERATE CARE ALS-1 ALS Assessment, O2, IV, Nitroglycerin Translingual Spray, ASA, Nitrous Oxide, 3-12 Lead EKG Monitoring, Spine Immobilization, Ultrasound, Glucose Monitoring, CO Monitoring, O2 Monitoring $1,676.00 $1,726.00 Level 4 - MAJOR CARE ALS-2 ALS Assessment and any of the following: 3 or more Medications Cardiac Pacing Cardioversion Defibrillation Intraosseous Infusions Surgical Airway Management Chest Decompression Endotracheal Intubation Central Venous Line, End-Tidal CO2 Monitoring PCT (inflated) Cardio/Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) $2,132.00 $2,196.00 RESPONSE TO SCENE AND NO TREATMENT OR TRANSPORTATION PROVIDED No Charge No Charge OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION Included in above Included in above MILEAGE FROM SCENE TO HOSPITAL $26.00/mile $26.00/mile ADDITIONAL STAFFING OR MECHANICAL EXTRICATION VEHICLE DECONTAMINATION $718.00 1-hour minimum $1,074.00 $740.00 1-hour minimum $1,106.00 MISCELLANEOUS FIRE FEES SPECIALIZED RESPONSE 2018 2019 Engine/Fire Company* $557.00 $574.00 Ladder Company* $735.00 $757.00 HazMat Unit* $814.00 $838.00 Special Operations Team* $1,026.00 $1,057.00 Limited Response* $279.00 $287.00 Gas Line Rupture Response* $479.00 $493.00 Specialized Equipment* Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Supplies or Additional Personnel Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Disposal Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Other City Resources Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Ambulance Standby* $239.00 $246.00 * Charges are per hour – one hour minimum Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 4th day of December, 2018. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 20___. _________________________________ City Clerk Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.O. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Three Engines and One Aerial Truck Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve the purchase of three fire engines and one aerial truck. T his purchase will replace existing fire apparatus. INTRODUCTION: This Request for Purchase will change a long-standing practice of keeping our large fire response vehicles in service for greater than 20 years. Replacing vehicles on our current replacement schedule has created a very divergent fleet of vehicles with significant maintenance and repairs cost in the latter half of their service life. The final manufacturer was selected through an RFP process and the purchase will be done through the Houston- Galveston Area Council Cooperative Purchasing Program. This program assists local governments in reducing costs through this government-to-government procurement service available nationwide. Creating a streamlined and consistent fleet of fire response vehicles will improve the operational environment for the fire crews, reduce operational risks and promote safer emergency scenes. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Three Engines and One Aerial Truck City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: December 4, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Tom M. Schmitz, Fire Chief Subject: Replace Three Engines and One Aerial Truck Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☒State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget This Request for Purchase is for three Rosenbauer Commander 4000 Pumper Engines and one Cobra Mid-Mount 101’ Aerial Platform. The vehicles will be purchased through the Houston- Galveston Area Council Cooperative Purchasing Program. This program assists local governments in reducing costs through this government-to-government procurement service available nationwide. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: November 21, 2018 30 days Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Rosenbauer $3,171,028.00 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact Our current fire vehicle fleet includes a 2005 and 2011 fire engine, a 1998 fire engine that was totaled in a 2017 crash and a 2001 100-ft aerial platform truck. The aging fleet has divergent designs that results in increased training time, increased operational risk, and increased maintenance and repair costs. We are projected to conservatively spend $3.5M in the next 12 years on the replacement of our current large fire vehicle fleet if action is not taken. This projected expenditure does not include fuel, maintenance, repair and equipment cost associated with keeping the current fleet operational. This Request for Purchase will change a long-standing practice of keeping our large fire response vehicles in service for greater than 20 years. Our new strategy includes trading in our current fleet and purchasing four new vehicles from one manufacturer. By changing this practice, we will better serve our community now and into the future through lower maintenance, repair and fuel expenses. This strategy will afford many efficiencies associated with a younger fleet of vehicles and equipment. Going forward we will replace the fleet every ten years which will significantly improve the trade-in value as compared to a 20-year vehicle. The final manufacturer was selected through an RFP process and the purchase will be done through the Houston-Galveston Area Council Cooperative Purchasing Program. This program assists local governments in reducing costs through this government-to-government procurement service available nationwide. The funding source for this purchase will be a combination of cash from the Equipment Replacement Fund and debt. The amount and type of debt will be dependent on several factors including the timing of other City debt issues, market conditions, and the vehicle payment schedule. Environmental Impact All four vehicles come with Rosenbauer’s Green Star IRT. This auxiliary power unit assists with allowing the equipment to work during a response without idling. This reduces the amount fuel used and wear on the engine during idling which is estimated at a $600 annual savings per vehicle. The Green Star IRT has the ability to reduce emissions up to 25%. This fulfills a top recommendation from the Green Fleet report to meet the fleet emission reduction goal of 30% by 2025. Not only will this provide a lower carbon footprint to the fleet, there will be less tailpipe emissions with reduced idling and better air quality where the fire engines are running equipment. Community Impact Page 3 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Creating a streamlined and consistent fleet of fire response vehicles will improve the operational environment for the fire crews, reduce operational risks and promote safer emergency scenes. Shifting to a 10-year replacement schedule will capitalize more frequently on industry changes in standards & best practice and take advantage of new technology in fuel efficiency and sustainability initiatives. Also, having one manufacturer for all vehicles will capitalize on reduced training time for fire crews. Finally, a shortened life-cycle of our fleet will allow the department to take advantage of changing landscapes within the community, such as the Living Streets Plan. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.P. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Replacement of Liquor Store Refrigeration Doors Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve request for purchase of refrigeration doors for the liquor stores. INTRODUCTION: Refrigeration doors at the liquor store are past their expected life. Replacement of doors will allow for a better guest experience and reduce operational energy expenses. Products have an estimated 15 year payback and are expected to last more than 20 years. See attached Request for P urchase. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request for Purchase: Replacement of Liquor Store Refrigeration Doors City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date:10/22/18 To: Mayor and City Council From: Keith Rischmiller, HVAC Specialist/Electrical Subject: Liquor Store Door and Refrigeration Replacement Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☐Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Southtown Refrigeration and Mechanical Southtown Refrigeration and Mechanical is a reputable company that has installed and serviced Edina’s Liquor store equipment with quality workmanship in the past and has shown that they are fair and competitively priced for their service. Their Quote reflects new equipment which includes doors for all stores ($91,274) and ECM and refrigeration replacement w/ digital defrost for Southdale store ($82,563). Crosstowns bid was very high per store and they commented that they would not have the ability to match Southtown’s bid. AA Equipment bid only covers used doors, which can present more maintenance and labor costs to maintain as well as a shorter life. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: 10/15/2018 30 Days Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: Southtown Refrigeration and Mechanical Crosstown Refrigeration and Mechanical AA Equipment $173,837 $261,000 $ 35,486 (Used Doors and ECM fans installed. Bid does not include refrigeration replacement) Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact This project will be funded out of the Liquor fund and will upgrade and replace cooler doors and cooling components at all three locations. The projected life of these upgrades and replacements is 20 years, the current doors and components have out lasted their projected lifetime. All costs for disposal have been included in the bid. These doors and motors will present an estimated $10,290 in operational energy savings annually. There will also be savings in labor and maintenance in the coming years. Additionally, we will receive a $10,382 rebate. This plus the energy savings cost will present 15 year payback or less. Environmental Impact The new doors have innovations like insulated glass and low voltage door heat, which will save 30% to 40% in energy from previous doors. Motor and door replacement will provide an estimate 128,600 kWh savings per year. This supports our facility operations goal to increase efficiency and reduce our electricity use by 5% or 893,000 kWh. There will be a small waste footprint as some but not all parts of current doors and motors can be recycled. Community Impact These are needed upgrades and replacements to provide a visually appealing customer experience. These upgrades and replacements have a projected life of 20 years. Current motors and doors consistently need maintenance as they have surpassed their estimated life. New doors will reduce the amount of maintenance and create a more consistent experience for customers. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.Q. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Joseph Abood, General Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Braemar Golf Course - Toro Reelmaster 3555-D Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Purchase of a Toro Reelmaster 3555-D funded by 2018 CIP. INTRODUCTION: Please see attached Request for Purchase. This is a state contract purchase. This guarantees the best price available for the exact item we need without soliciting quotes. Our course maintenance fleet is all Toro. Toro provides exceptional products with readily available parts and we receive strong trade in pricing due to exceptional quality equipment. ATTACHMENTS: Description Toro Reelmaster City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: December 4, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Joe Abood, Braemar Golf Course General Manager Subject: Request for Purchase - Toro Reelmaster 3555-D Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☒State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 11/16/2018 Bid or expiration Date: Company: MTI Distributing Amount of Quote or Bid: $48,889.38 Recommended Quote or Bid: Toro Reelmaster 3555-D $32,718.10 22in 5 in Blade (5) $12,390.80 Universal Sunshade $559.91 400 Hour MVP Filter Kit $75.64 Sales Tax 6.875% $3,144.93 Total $48,889.38 Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact • CIP • Adding another fairway mower to fleet due to more fairway acreage. • Will have at least 3 mowers going out and possibly a 4th. The 4th mower will start with range tee and then help out if needed. • Uses less fuel than 4 wheel mowers. Environmental Impact • Weight is 20% lighter than comparably equipped 4 wheel drive fairway mowers • 3 wheel drive system provides power to at least two wheels at all times. • Impressive traction on hills or wet terrain. • Much less wear and tear on tight turns with the 3-wheel traction. • Complies with ANSI B71.4-2012 and CE requirements. EN ISO 5395. Community Impact • Operator friendly and easily trainable. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.R. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Request For Purchase From:Joseph Abood, General Manager Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Braemar Golf Course - Toro Triflex 3320 Hybrid Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Purchase of a Toro Triflex 3320 Hybrid funded by the 2018 CIP. INTRODUCTION: Please see attached Request for Purchase. This is a state contract purchase. This guarantees the best price available for the exact item we need without soliciting quotes. Our course maintenance fleet is all Toro. Toro provides exceptional products with readily available parts and we receive strong trade in pricing due to exceptional quality equipment. ATTACHMENTS: Description Triflex Hybrid City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: December 4, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Joe Abood, Braemar Golf Course General Manager Subject: Request for Purchase - Toro Triflex 3320 Hybrid Purchase Subject to: ☐List Quote/Bid ☒State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget Toro Triflex 3320 Hybrid Greens mower $38,067.77 Extra Set of Cutting Units (3) $7,769.96 Trade: Toro Pro Sweep ($3,000) Toro 3500 ($4,500) Toro 3150 ($3,000) Toro 3150 ($2,000) Sales Tax 6.875% $2,291.97 Total $35,629.7 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: 11/16/2018 Bid or expiration Date: Company: MTI Distributing Amount of Quote or Bid: $35,629.7 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact • CIP • Replacing Toro 3150 Greens mower with 3320 Hybrid on new championship course. • Quick change cutting units makes servicing fast and easy. • This model delivers the productivity of a rider and the precision of a walk mower. Environmental Impact • Maximizes fuel economy to improve cost. You can operate in energy savings mode which consists of lower RPM’s and all-electric reel drives maintains a constant reel speed. This results in reduced fuel consumption and noise while maintaining quality of cut, performance and productivity. • All electric reel drive system eliminates hydraulic leaks. • Double A-Arm suspension for superior ground flotation-floats freely over contours and undulations resulting in superior turf conditions. • Certified to meet ANSI specification B71.4 - 2004 and European CE standards. Community Impact • Height of cut can be set lower than the 3150 triplex. New varieties of bentgrass stay healthier at this lower height. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.S. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Request for Purchase: Design Services Park Signage and Wayfinding Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve Request for Purchase for Design Services Park Signage and Wayfinding INTRODUCTION: See attached report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Request For Purchase DREAMBOX Proposal City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Date: Dec. 4, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Subject: Request for Purchase: Design Services Park Signage and Wayfinding Purchase Subject to: ☒List Quote/Bid ☐State Contract ☐Service Contract The Recommended Bid is: ☒Within Budget ☐Not Within Budget The park signage and wayfinding design project will provide us with a full signage schedule. Scope of work includes a signage assessment, signage concepts, design intent and recommended materials for main wayfinding and park regulation signage. The Parks & Recreation Commission and staff determined that working with an experienced design firm on the vision and design was the next step in completing the overall signage project. The Parks & Recreation Commission and other city departments will be involved in selecting the design for the signage. The next step, after the design phase, is to advertise for a sealed bid for the fabrication and installation of signs. Staff requests that the City Council approve the selection of RSP DREAMBOX to provide design services for the replacement of all internal park signage and wayfinding design. RSP DREAMBOX worked on the Parks, Recreation and Trails Strategic Plan. They have also worked with Dakota County, the City of Brooklyn Park and Tamarack Nature Center on signage projects. Wayfinding systems serve an important role responding to the need for basic navigation, identification and information. Wayfinding elements can enrich and enhance an experience and connect us to the parks. If approved, work will get started immediately and be ready for a spring of 2019 installation. City Attorney Roger Knutson reviewed the Professional Services Agreement. Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or expiration Date: Nov. 5, 2018 NA Company: Amount of Quote or Bid: RSP DREAMBOX $48,000 Recommended Quote or Bid: Page 2 City of Edina • 4801 W. 50th St. • Edina, MN 55424 Request for Purchase Department Director Authorization: ________________________________________ City Council Authorization Date: ______________________ (for purchases over $20,000 only) Budget Impact In 2014, City Council approved a development plan and subdivision request that created the Continental Gardens 100 unit housing project. The owner of the new development paid the city a Park Improvement Fund payment of $500,000. Those funds were allocated to spend on replacing all of the signage in Edina parks. In 2017, the city spent $261,608 replacing all of the main park entrance signs. There is approximately $238,390 remaining in the project budget to finish all signage. Environmental Impact NA Community Impact The new signage will provide better identification of park features and regulations for residents using the parks. The design, materials and colors selected will tie into existing materials and colors used for the main park entrance signs and newer shelter buildings. Current signage in the parks is not consistent. The sign materials, verbiage, and color of signs are not consistent and, in some of the parks, there is no signage. TODD PARK lab* The l EDINA EDINA PARKS SIGNAGE + WAYFINDING DESIGN NOVEMBER 5, 2018 PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY RSPOR7A 1 B OX ii At least 17 studies have concluded that poor wayfindin.g contributes to employee and visitor stress: "Being able to find one's way or not find one's way causes a range of reactions in the individual: insecurity, anxiety, loss of time, frustration, fear of getting lost or not getting somewhere on time, In short, poor wayfinding impacts staff morale and the bottom line," Chicago / 41.8827° N, 87.6233° W * Wall Street Journal (October 2012) Pogo 2 110vontor 2018 12SPDREAMBOX Even in an era of ubiquitous and hand held wayfinding tools, there is a sense of ease from seeing • grounded, substantial signage elements to confirm that we are where we think we are. 99 Dear Ms. Kattreh and Ms. Faus, Thank you for providing us an opportunity to share our capabilities, interest and a proposal to design the next generation of Edina Park signage system.What a great opportunity! We would be thrilled to work with you to develop a distinctive and consistent branded system for all of your:users to identify and navigate your parks easily. We are experienced graphic designers, landscape architects and builders of environmental identities for a broad range of clients. But perhaps more importantly, we know how to sensitively design experiences of place to help users connect to that place. As you know from work completed on your master plan there are many types of wayfinding devices, from large scale to intimate. And with the ubiquitous use of personal devices for wayfinding, standard signs take on new roles; to inform, but also to engage, delight and create connections to the place itself. We will build on the signage assessment and recommendations made in the master plan, and will focus our design efforts on creating user ease, and engagement. A project of this nature will require a thorough assessment of your existing signing system, and determining what's working well, and what isn't. We'll view your system through an experiential lens and then, alongside your key stakeholders, conduct a robust visioning of Edina Park's ideal signage and wayfinding experience, answering the question: what should the next-gen Edina signage system be and feel like? This collaborative work together will ensure that you have an elegant, communicative, timeless signage system that will be embraced by stakeholders, staff and your community. We also get the importance of timing and budgets, so we will engage early with our signage partner to benchmark signage costs. We have crafted a 12 week work plan, but defer to your scheduling needs, and will manage to that. Please let us know what works for you! Thank you for considering us for this important work! We'd love to be your partner in this once in a generation design effort. Very sincerely, Teri Kwant Director RSPDREAMBOX Pago 3 Novombor 201E1 RSPDREAMBOX world YOU ARE HERE. STUDIO OVERVIEW RSPDREAMBOX AN EXPERIENCE DESIGN + PLACE MAKING STUDIO. Dreambox works at the intersection of the environment and human experience. We take a highly experiential: approach to design, place-making and wayfinding. We listen to key stakeholders and users, and we observe. We empathize. We uncover the essence of a place and communicate it elegantly. We believe that the best design emerges from insights of our users, and the consistent wayfinding and way showing. We live in a world where cities can be navigated through a smart- phone or other technologies and any information on a destination can be found within minutes. With all of these tools at our disposal, why are physical wayfinding elements even necessary? Wayfinding systems serve an important and crucial role well beyond responding to the need for basic navigation, identification and information. Wayfinding elements can enrich and enhance our experiences and connect us to place. WE'RE ON A MISSION TO IMPROVE THE WORLD ONE EXPERIENCE ATA TIME... 10111E HERE. Identity I Place Branding I Design Research I Experience Design Consulting I Interpretive Planning I Exhibit Design I Environmental Communications I Wayfinding Strategy Pago 4 Navombor 2018 RS PDREAMBOX PROJECT UNDERSTANDING WE UNDERSTAND YOUR CHALLENGES + OPPORTUNITIES Our premise is this—your city creates thousands of experiences of the Edina Park brand — each park visit, website ping, trail usage or skate.These experiences can and do serve as ambassadors for your parks, living on in the memories of your park users. Our practice of designing wayfinding experiences takes these current perceptions into consideration, and paired with your vision, allows us to construct a holistic signage and wayfinding approach that aligns with your unique Edina Parks experience. We propose to collaborate throughout our work with a signage partner to have a full signage schedule right from the beginning to inform our work. We will start by deciding what signs can be removed, or made more efficient in their messaging. We'll review concepts with a landscape architect to ensure our concepts work seamlessly with your parks. Our team will collaboratively research materials, look for efficiencies, and prepare you to go out to bid fdr the implementation part of the work. Last but not least we know you, and your unique house of park brands. We also understand how to sensitively create a uniform and unique signage system that allows all of your parks to shine and be a great experience for your guests. :r1P1boL • TughFT1: Vitafti4/ FIELD Pages Noumea 2010 PDREAMBOX PROCESS + APPROACH We propose to do a signage and experience assessment of existing Edina Park signage. A signage schedule will be developed. We will engage with park users and community about their interests and activities. The master plan signage assessment will be reviewed for design intent Discovery includes: SIGNAGE ASSESSMENT, COMMUNITY MEETING FACILITATION, PRIORITY SIGN CATEGORIES CONFIRMED Meeting with key stakeholders and possibly community, we will develop a vision for the Edina park signage system. We will define our design criteria including experiential goals and material durability. Dream state activities include: MEETING FACILITATION, SETTING DESIGN CRITERIA, SETTING EXPERIENCE CRITERIA, APPROVAL TO PROCEED We will generate a series of signage design options for the Edina Park branding collaboration with all team members. These viable options will be based on research, experience goals and design criteria and vision. Once a direction is selected, we will provide a refinement to the preferred option. Design phase activities include: DESIGN + COLLABORATION, INTERNAL CRITIQUES, MEETING + STAKEHOLDER GROUP FACILITATION, COLLABORATIONS: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND SIGNAGE VENDOR(S), APPROVAL TO REFINE, APPROVAL TO PROCEED The last phase of our work is to create a concise signage intent document that will include the priority signage typicals, color, fabrication and material intent. We will collaborate with your seleCted signage vendor to determine most cost effective ways to fabricate the system. DESIGN IYPICALS DOCUMENTATION", COLLABORATION WITH SIGNAGE VENDOR(S), PRESENTATION, APPROVAL "All design documents will be developed to indicate clear design intent shop drawings will be provided by signage vendor. OUR PROCESS Our process is simple, but not simplistic. It is designed to incorporate stkeholder perspectives, uncover user insights and define the ideal experience. It also helps us move quickly and nimbly so you can be breaking ground on the signage installation next spring of 2017. 1 Discover row- 4 D'ifi''';'11M1 4Do EXPERIENCES ARE RATIONAL, EMOTIONAL + SENSORIAL Pow 6 Novsmber 20111 R S PDREAMBOX SCHEDULE + WORK PLAN Project Activities + Schedule Week 1 L SITEVISITS + SIGNAGE ASSESSMENT Week 2 Week 3 _1 Week 4 Weeks 1 Week 6 I Week 7 I_ Week 8 Week 9 Week 10 Week 11 Week 12 1 1 DISCOVER SIGNAGE SCHEDULE STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS + MEETINGS PRIORITY SIGNAGE ASSESSMENT FINDINGS PRESENTATION 1 DREAM INTERVIEWS L 1 , , MEETING FACILITATION • SETTING DESIGN CRITERIA APPROVAL TO PROCEED DESIGN DESIGN + COLLABORATION •••72:71 1 INTERNAL CRITIQUES MEETING + STAKEHOLDER GROUP FACILITATION APPROVALTO REFINE APPROVAL TO PROCEED DO DESIGN TYPICALS DOCUMENTATION* 1-- , 1 I I 1 DESIGN COLLABORATION WITH LA+ SIGNAGE PRESENTATIONS I I APPROVALS I TRANSFER OF FILES I L. 1 L i 1 L 1 Pogo Nowmbar 2018 RS PD RE AM BOX — r - PROJECT FEES 1 Discover A signage and experience assessment of existing Edina Park signage. Signage schedule developed for the specific scope determined at project kick-off. Engage with users and community. Review signage assessment for design intent. Assumptions $ 10,000 SIGNAGE ASSESSMENT, MEETING FACILITATION, PRIORITY SIGN CATEGORIES CONFIRMED, ASSESSMENT FINDINGS PRESENTATION The project schedule and fee in this proposal is based on the following assumptions: 1. Stakeholder interviews and community meetings may be replaced with observational research or Experience Intervention Meeting with key stakeholders and community. Develop a vision for the Edina park signage system. Define design criteria: experiential and material sustainability. Interviews at client's discretion. Four 90 minute meetings for presentation included. $ 5000 MEETING FACILITATION, SETTING DESIGN CRITERIA, SETTING EXPERIENCE 2. Sub-brands of parks will retain their own identities. Centennial CRITERIA, APPROVAL TO PROCEED. Lakes and Edinborough are excluded from this signage package. 3. Scope of work will include and recommended materials way inding typicals and park signacte concepts, design intent, for a' (monument) signage, regulation signage. Design options for the Edina Park brand signage and landscape.Three viable options based on assessment design criteria and vision. Design refinement to the preferred option. DESIGN + COLLABORATION, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE REVIEW, INTERNAL 4. All signage schedules, shop drawings and specs will be provided by the client's selected signage vendor. $ 18,000 CRITIQUES, MEETING + STAKEHOLDER GROUP MEETINGS, APPROVAL TO REFINE, DESIGN PRESENTATIONS, REFINEMENTS, APPROVAL TO PROCEED. 5. Printing and materials are additional. 6. This signage design effort is not intended to replace a signage master planning effort which would identify specific recommended signage locations and be code. 4 Do A concise signage intent document that will include the priority signage typicals, color, fabrication and material intent. 7. Schedule may be adjusted to be installation ready Spring 2017. DESIGN TYPICALS DOCUMENTATION', COLLABORATION WITH SIGNAGE $ 15,000 VENDOR(S), PRESENTATIONS, APPROVAL. 8. Fee is negotiable based on scope required. *All design documents will be developed to indicate clear design intent, shop drawings will Total $ 48,000— be provided by signage vendor. " Project management is included in this fee. Powe Novambor 2010 RS PDREAMBOX fl OUR WORK Pogo 9 Nal/mbar 201e RSPDREAMBOX U U U U n South St. Paul Stockyards cattle chute experience n .. • „Iwo. • _MGC; xto a 4111 41.1 HOLISTIC EXPERIENCES OF HISTORY + PLACE DAKOTA COUNTY BRANDING + INTERPRETIVE PLAN EXPERIENCES TO ENGAGE + INCREASE TRAIL USE The Mississippi River Regional Trail runs 27 miles from South St. Paul to Hastings. It passes through towns,-crosses railroad tracks, parallels roads; it sometimes follows the river closely, and sometimes veers away. This readily apparent variety along the trail is interwoven with historical, cultural, ecological, and narrative richness. Stretches of the trail have been inhabited for 8,000 years. Many sites have inspired grand dreams. Some have known success and others have known disappointment and some have been well acquainted with both. Stories of grit, ghosts, and gangsters populate the trail while it connects places of natural beauty and engineering feats, gathering places and places of solitude; rare plant communities and migratory routes. RSP Dreambox was asked to leverage these compelling stories and create engaging moments along the trail, to increase trail use, and share the history of the area in a memorable way. The interpretive plan and exhibit concepts we developed for each of the 10 locations will engage users in a number of ways, from whole body experiences to augmented reality. Pap ID Novombor2018 REC MX SEEN OnnellrlY DECIDUOUS FOREST NOT RECENTLY SEEN Iva HEAR Oa, DECIDUOUS FOREST SEE :in Pt DECIDUOUS FOREST NOT RECENTLY SEEN MEV FON SEE J11,, DECIDUOUS FOREST NOT RECENTLY SEEN MUNK'? LOOK BIOME DECIDUOUS FOREST NOT RECENTLY SEEN DRAGONFLY wmaitrai SIGNAGE THAT ENGAGES, DELIGHTS + INFORMS CONNECTIONS AT SHINGLE CREEK As part of a multi-disciplinary team RSP Dreambox worked on the Connections at Shingle Creek. The project integrates planning, bike trails, a learning zone to be used by schools and the public, as well as community informed artwork. It is a partnership between the City of Brooklyn Park, City of Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, Independent School District 279, and Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. As part of the scope of work, the team has engaged several dozen stakeholders in interviews, surveys, and group sessions to identify what makes the area unique, and what aspects of their culture and neighborhood can be celebrated and identified through public art. With the help of middle school students, science teachers, trail users, and local business owners, the objectives for the public artwork are becoming clear and actionable. The wayfinding signage and seating design is currently being installed. Pngon November MIR RSPDREAMBOX PERMISSION TO EXPLORE! OUTDOOR DISCOVERY Pogo 12 Novombor 2018 1 S PDREAMBOX Dreambox led the design and interpretive planning for a new nature center in White Bear Lake, Minnesota. The intent was to engage adults and children in explorations together and create meaningful connections to each other through nature. The gardens and landscapes provided the place, and the interpretive plan identified key audiences, their pathways, and it resulted in an appropriate, playful signage type that increased a sense of whimsy and willingness to play. TAMARACK NATURE CENTER EXPERIENCE DESIGN, IN FERPNETIVE PLAN + SIGNAGE Visitor pathway 1. Adult + child dyad It's about the relationship + shared experience Visitor pathway 2. Child Something many children of different ages might engage in, work on or accomplish Visitor pathway 3. Adult A valuable, suitable, and satisfying role for an adult with or without children SIGNAGE + BRAND EXPERIENCES THAT CELEBRATE THE ART OF BUILDING MORTENSON Through interviews with business founder and Chairman Mort Mortenson, we learned that he has a deep love and respect for the tradespeople he worked with for decades in the construction industry. The culture of valuing hard work is the fabric of the organization and became the foundation for all of the story telling artwork and branded exhibits at their international headquarters in Minneapolis. The company cafe was named after Superintendents, and the identity of the cafe brand carried this message with murals, signage and the famed "hammer wall," a physical tribute to past employees. A miniature working crane exhibit tells the story of the degree of difficulty of managing this towering equipment, by sitting in an actual crane operator's seat while loading materials. Pogo 13 November 2013 RSPDREAMBOX SCIENCE IS FUN! SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MINNESOTA As lead designer for the interpretive planning and exhibit design for The Human Body, Teri led the holistic development of the museum's 7000 square foot exhibit. Stories included a look at cultural perspectives of beauty, body informed art, genetic diseases, functions of the lungs and heart and brain, and laboratory experiences. This project was completed by Teri Kwant prior to joining RSP Dreambox. Pogo 14 Novembor 2018 R SP BO), TEAM LEAD Teri Kwant AIGA, NAI Director, RSP Dreambox PROJECT ROLE: LEAD EXPERIENCE DESIGNER ii.My purpose in designing experiences is to create objects, interactions and environments that deeply connect us, to place, to each other, and to ourselves. As a skilled experience design consultant, and Director of RSP Dreambox, Ted has created environmental and experience design projects for cities, museums, Fortune 500 companies, healthcare and direct services non-profits, all from an experiential, functional and multi-sensory point of view. She has lectured on the design of experience, environments and communications at numerous universities and colleges.Teri has facilitated public processes anc community collaborations for cities, neighborhoods and individual organizations that have yielded game-changing user insights to inform and confirm design approach. Relevant Experience • Dakota County Mississippi River Interpretive Trail, Dakota County, MN • Connections at Shingle Creek Signage Interpretive Plan, Brooklyn Park; MN • Tamarack Nature Center, Discovery Hollow Signage + Interpretive Plan, St. Paul, MN • Olympus Surgical Technologies.America, Visitor Experience Tour, Brooklyn Park, MN • HCMC Emergency Department Experience Assessment, Minneapolis, MN • Ecolab Customer Experience + Exhibit Design, Monheim, Germany • Wilder Foundation Headquarters, Signage, Furniture Design + Environmental Communications, St. Paul, MN* • The Gathering Bridge, Eden Prairie, MN* • Conversation Tables, Open Book, Minneapolis, MN* • Landmark Plaza Artifacts Public Art, St. Paul, MN • Field Museum, Chicago, IL* * Projects completed while associated with another firm Pago 15 Noatrabot2015 RS PDREAMBOX YOU'RE IN GOOD COMPANY Our practice of experience based place branding and environmental communications creates places that engage and delight users. We always design based on the essential stories of your organization or community, and then we help you communicate your authentic story, whether it's for a park, museum cafe, an exhibit, a city or an on line community. CULTURAL/EDUCATION CIVIC HEALTH + WELLBEING Capella University* Austin Visitor Center Doylestown Health + Wellness* Federal Executive InStitute* Dakota County Hennepin Medical Field Museum of Chicago* Eden Prairie* LifeSource Friends School of Minnesota' Minneapolis Wilder Foundation" Minnesota Children's Museum* Prior Lake Mayo Clinic Musical Instrument Museum Rochester Crescent Cove North Central Technical College* Shingle Creek Science Museum of Minnesota* St. Paul Saint Cloud State University RETAIL Tamarack Nature Center CORPORATE Discount Tire Winona State University Marshall Fields* American Express Royal Bank of Canada* Covidian Starbucks* Ecolab Target* HB Fuller Wells Fargo* Mortensen 'These projects represent work completed at other firms. Olympus Pape 16 tiovambor 2016 RSPDRE A IV! B 0 X Edina! We're excited! We look forward to hearing from you! THANK YOU! Teri Kwant Associate Principal Director / RSP Dreambox teri.kwantOrspdreambox.com 612.677.7121 direct 612.677.7100 main 612.308.2588 mobile 1220 Marshall Street NE Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 rspdreambox.com Pogo 17 Novornbor 2010 R S PDREAM B OX Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: IV.T. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-129: Approving Proposed Parks & Recreation Department Fees for 2019 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to approve proposed Parks & Recreation Department fees for 2019. INTRODUCTION: See attached report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff Report Resolution No. 2018-129 2019 Proposed Fees December 4, 2018 Mayor and City Council Susan Faus, Assistant Parks & Recreation Director Proposed Parks & Recreation Department Fees for 2019 Information / Background: Attached is a copy of the proposed Parks & Recreation Department and Enterprise Facilities Fees. Fees are set at a level that accomplishes the following: Users pay their fair share of the costs associated with the programs and facilities they use today and should not place that burden on future taxpayers (user-based-fee philosophy). Keep programs and activities affordable and accessible to residents. Cover the costs associated with the activity or facility whenever possible. Create an opportunity for all residents to participate in basic recreation programs regardless of their ability to pay (i.e. Edina Community Foundation Ready-Set-Connect Program). The city could probably charge higher fees in some instances without seeing a significant drop in participation, whereas higher fees in other programs would see a significant drop in participation and/or rentals. Significant staff time is involved in making fee recommendations. Several factors are considered: 1. Fees charged at neighboring communities (i.e. Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Plymouth and Bloomington) 2. Operating budget and cost recovery targets 3. Program classifications and program life cycles 4. Review of fee history 5. Customer feedback REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 The department will be offering several new programs with new fees in 2019. Youth dance and karate, adult cricket, lawn bowling, bocce ball (Braemar Courtyard), a fee to exclusively reserve the sand volleyball courts and a new fee for off-season tournaments at Braemar Arena. There are no significant fee increases proposed in 2019. Staff continue to review cost recovery expectations for recreation programs by classifying programming and determining program life cycles. ESSENTIAL Programs IMPORTANT Programs VALUE-ADDED Programs Public interest;Legal Mandate; Mission Alignment • High public expectation • High public expectation • High individual and interest group expectation Financial Sustainability • Free, nominal or fee tailored to public needs • Requires public funding • Fees cover some direct costs • Requires a balance of public funding and a cost recovery target • Fees cover most direct and indirect costs • Some public funding as appropriate Benefits (i.e., health, safety, protection of assets). • Substantial public benefit • Public and individual benefit • Primarily individual benefit Competition in the Market • Limited or no alternative providers • Alternative providers unable to meet demand or need • Alternative providers readily available Access • Open access by all • Open access • Limited access to specific users • Limited access to specific users REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 3 In 2018 city staff developed a pair of cost recovery calculations in part to measure the financial performance of the enterprise facilities. These calculations are a refinement of the performance measure included in the budget document defined as “Operating Revenue as a % of Operating Expenses.” The new cost recovery calculations are: (1) Total Cost – represents the total, ongoing cost of each facility. The calculation includes operating income/ (loss) including city billed utility costs. (Total Cost targets will change once amounts are available for newly metered water/storm/sewer) (2) Variable Cost – represents the facility’s management of budget, revenue and costs, or the “variable cost” measurement. The calculation includes operating income/ (loss) excluding depreciation, central services and water/sewer/storm. The expectation is that actual performance will fall within an acceptable range of the target. Recommended Cost Recovery Targets: Following are cost recovery calculations for 2017 actuals and 2018 budget followed by the recommended targets. 2017 2018 Target 2018/2019 Art Center Total Cost CR* 68% 72% 70% Variable Cost CR 75% 78% 75% Aquatic Center Total Cost CR* 96% 99% 100% Variable Cost CR 151% 148% 145% Golf Course Total Cost CR* 47% 50% 100%** Variable Cost CR 65% 82% 120% Golf Dome Total Cost CR* 75% 77% 75% Variable Cost CR 182% 183% 180% Ice Arena Total Cost CR* 89% 81% 80% Variable Cost CR 119% 110% 110% REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 4 Sports Dome Total Cost CR* 59% 46% 50% Variable Cost CR 162% 118% 115% Edinborough Park Total Cost CR* 105% 83% 80% Variable Cost CR 127% 99% 100% Centennial Lakes Park Total Cost CR* 76% 72% 70% Variable Cost CR 85% 81% 80% * Total Cost targets will change once amounts are available for newly metered water/storm/sewer. ** Based on open regulation course. The Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed and recommended the 2019 proposed fees. Youth Programs 2018 2019 Art in the Park $15 $15 Barnyard Babies (per person)$5 $5 Boys Flag Football $75 $75 Bunny Breakfast at Braemar Golf Course $10/kids $15/adults $15 Fab 4 & 5 $105 $105 Garden Camp $70 $75 Glow Dodgeball $15 $15 Highlands Explorers $84 $95 Playground Program $60 $65 Playground Pros $95 $95 Playground Pros 2.0 NA $135 Princess Ball $45/couple $50/couple Safety Camp $40 $40 Super 6 and 7 $72 $72 Super Hero Saturday $35/couple $35/couple Tennis Lessons Pee Wee (ages 5-7)$40 $40 Tennis Lessons Beginners - 2 days $40 $40 Tennis Lessons Beginners - 3 days $65 $65 Tennis Lessons - Intermediates $65 $65 Tennis Lessons - Advanced Intermediate $65 $65 Tennis - Parent/Child lessons $68 $68 Travelin' Teens $165 $175 Adaptive Programs 2018 2019 Bowling Club $105 $110 Dream Ice Skating $125 $100 Presents for the Holidays $70 $75 Spring Art Class $70 $75 Spring/Summer Golf $90 $100 Super Saturdays NA $15 Theater Camp $160 $175 Water Aerobics $45 $45 Winter Golf $70 $70 Private Adaptive Swim Lessons $27.50 $27.50 Partnership Programs 2018 2019 SETTING PARK & RECREATION FEES FOR 2019 RESOLUTION NUMBER 2018-129 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following Parks & Recreation Fees for 2019. PARKS & RECREATION PROGRAMS Twinkle Toes Dance NA $60 Princess Dance NA $60 Beginning Karate NA $60 Intro to Cricket NA $40 Flag Rugby NA $50 Volleyball Camp (w/Edina Volleyball Association)Varies Varies Contracted Programs 2018 2019 Active Solutions Varies Varies DNR Varies Varies KidCreate Studio (Reach Education Solutions)Varies Varies Edina Football Association Varies Varies Revolutionary Sports Varies Varies Skyhawks Varies Varies Soccer Shots Varies Varies Three Rivers Park District Varies Varies Garden Plot 2018 2019 Community Garden Plot 10 X 10 $35 $35 Community Garden Plot 10 X 15 $40 $40 Pickleball 2018 2019 Adult Pickleball Lessons $25 $25 Parent/Child Pickleball Lessons $20/pair $20/pair Pickleball Clinic $12 $12 Pickleball League - Summer $40/pair $40/pair Pickleball League - Fall $12 $12 Tennis Lessons 2018 2019 Beginner Lessons $67 $67 Intermediate Lessons $67 $67 Summer Softball Leagues 2018 2019 Men's League $470 $470 Men's League Resident Discount Rate $410 $410 Co-Rec League $505 $505 Co-Rec League - Resident Discount Rate $450 $450 Men's Double Header League $695 $695 Men's Double Header League - Resident Discount Rate $635 $635 Minnetonka/Edina Co-Rec League $590 $590 Minnetonka/Edina Co-Rec League - Resident Discount Rate $530 $530 ADULT ACTIVITIES ADULT ATHLETIC FEES 2 Fall Softball $340 $340 Fall Softball - Resident Discount Rate $300 $300 Volleyball 2018 2019 Officiated Co-Rec League $385 $385 Officiated Co-Rec League - Resident Discount Rate $350 $360 Officiated Women's League $275 $275 Basketball 2018 2019 5-Man C League $540 $540 5-Man C League Resident Discount $485 $500 5-Man B League $540 $540 5-Man B League Resident Discount $485 $500 Hockey 2018 2019 4-Man League $305 $305 4-Man League Resident Discount $260 $260 Kickball 2018 2019 Co-Rec $225 $225 Co-Rec Resident Discount $210 $210 Soccer 2018 2019 Organized Pick-up League $540 $150 Organized Pick-up League Resident Discount $520 $150 Cricket 2018 2019 Co-Rec NA $285 Co-Rec Resident Discount NA $265 Season Tickets 2018 2019 Resident Purchased By April 30, 2019 (Early Bird Rate) Individual or First Family Member $59.75 $65.75 Each Additional Member $54.50 $60 Resident Purchased After April 30, 2019 (Regular Rate) Individual or First Family Member $66 $72.75 Each Additional Member $60.75 $67 Non-Resident Purchased By April 30, 2019 (Early Bird Rate) Individual or First Family Member $76.50 $84.25 Each Additional Member $69.75 $76.75 Non-Resident Purchased After April 30, 2019 (Regular Rate) AQUATIC CENTER 3 Individual or First Family Member $83.25 $91.50 Each Additional Member $76.50 $84.25 FlowRider 2018 2019 Daily Admission FlowRider Add'l per person $5.35 $5.58 Rental and Instruction - 30 minutes $55 $60 Rental and Instruction - 1 hour $100 $110 Daily Admissions 2018 2019 Daily Admission (resident & non-resident)$10.70 $10.70 Admission after 5 p.m.$8.40 $8.40 Daily Admission FlowRider Add'l per person $5.35 $5.58 Group Reservation Rate $9.50 $9.50 Lane Rentals 2018 2019 Aqua Jets $16/hr.$16/hr. Edina Swim Club Only $11.50/hr.$11.50/hr. Birthday Party Packages - 2 hours 2018 2019 High Seas Package $225 $225 Twlight Package $200 $200 Green Fees 2018 2019 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee $45 $45 Weekday 18 Hole Player's Card Holder $35 $35 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee - Senior $42 $42 Weekday 18 Hole Player's Card Holder - Senior $32 $32 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee - Under 25 $32 $32 Weekday 18 Hole Daily Fee - Junior $22 $22 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee $24 $24 Weekday 9 Hole Player's Card Holder $19 $19 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee - Senior $22 $22 Weekday 9 Hole Player's Card Holder - Senior $17 $17 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee - Under 25 $17 $17 Weekday 9 Hole Daily Fee - Junior $14 $14 Weekend 18 Hole Daily Fee $49 $49 Weekend 18 Hole Player's Card Holder $39 $39 Weekend 18 Hole Player's Card Holder - Senior $36 $36 Weekend 18 Hole Daily Fee - Under 25 $36 $36 Weekend 18 Hole Daily Fee - Junior After 1 p.m.$25 $25 Weekend 9 Hole Daily Fee $26 $26 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 4 Weekend 9 Hole Player's Card Holder $21 $21 Weekend 9 Hole Player's Card Holder - Senior $19 $19 Weekend 9 Hole Daily Fee - Under 25 $19 $19 Weekend 9 Hole Daily Fee - Junior after 1 p.m.$16 $16 Player's Cards 2018 2019 Resident Player's Card $50 $75 Non-Resident Player's Card $65 $100 Platinum Player's Card - Edina Resident $75 Gold Player's Card - Non-Resident $100 Silver's Player Card Resident $25 Non-Resident $35 Computerized Handicaps 2018 2019 Player's Card Holder $36 $36 Non-Player's Card Holder $44 $44 Club Rental and Push Carts 2018 2019 Club Rental $25 $35 Push Carts - 9 Hole $5 $5 Push Carts - 18 Hole $7 $7 Golf Cars 2018 2019 18 Hole Daily Fee $33 $33 18 Hole Player's Card Holder $31 $31 9 Hole Daily Fee $20 $20 9 Hole Player's Card Holder $19 $19 Youth Activities 2018 2019 Breakfast With Santa $15/person $14/kids $19/Adults SNAG Golf $50 Little Tykes $55 Little Tykes with golf clubs $220 Junior Get Ready Golf Lessons $60 Junior Get Ready Golf Lessons with golf clubs $225 Junior Development $110 Advanced Junior Development $220 PGA Jr. Golf League $250 Junior Leagues - Par 3 and Jr. Girls $125 Junior Leagues - Championship 9 $150 Adult Activities 2018 2019 5 Nite Glow Golf $35 $35 Indoor Bean Bag League $75/2 person team $75/2 person team Lawn Bowling Leagues $75/2 person team Get Ready Adult Group Lessons Basic and Intermediate Levels $95 Basic and Intermediate Levels with golf clubs $295 Advanced Level $130 Ladies Get Ready Golf Lessons Basic Level Golf Dome and Driving Range $95 Basic Level Golf Dome and Driving Range with golf clubs $295 Intermediate Level Golf Dome $95 Intermediate Level Driving Range $89 Intermediate Level Driving Range with golf clubs $295 Ladies Golf Camp $250 Adult Driving and Iron Play Golf Clinic $20 Short Game Clinic $160 Putting Clinic and Fitting $225 Adult and Junior Golf Lessons (ages 6 and older)$150/pair Braemar Courtyard 2018 2019 Single Lane - Edina Resident NA $20/hour Single Lane - Player's Card Holder NA $20/hour Single Lane - Non-Resident NA $25/hour Half Court NA $75/hour Full Court NA $150/hour Contracted Programs 2018 2019 Golf Professionals Varies Varies Braemar Room 2018 2019 Cooper Conference Room - M-Th 9 a.m.-5 p.m.NA $40/hour Cooper Conference Room - M-Th after 5 p.m.NA $50/hour Cooper Conference Room - Fri-Sun and Holidays NA $50/hour Braemar Driving Range 2018 2019 Large Bucket - Daily Fee $9 $9 Large Bucket - Player's Card Holder $8 $8 Small Bucket $5 $5 Greens Fees 2018 2019 Academy 9 Daily Fee $16.50 $16.50 Academy 9 Player's Card Holder $13.50 $13.50 ACADEMY 9 COURSE 6 Junior $11 $11 Golf Cars 2018 2019 Academy 9 Daily Fee $16 $16 Academy 9 Player's Card Holder $15 $15 Pull Carts $3 $3 Player's Cards 2018 2019 Resident Player's Card $25 $25 Non-Resident Player's Card $35 $35 Adult Annual Pass $425 $425 Junior Annual Pass $350 $350 2018 2019 Large Bucket Daily Fee $9 $9 Large Bucket Player's Card Holder $8 $8 Time Golf 1/2 hour $14 $14 Hourly Field Rental $175 $175 Pool & Track Daily Admission 2018 2019 Residents and Non-Residents $7 $7.44 Pool & Track 10 Admission Pass 2018 2019 Residents and Non-Residents $65.10 $69.75 Pool & Track Annual Membership 2018 2019 Resident Individual $275 $300 Each additional member $95 $120 Non-Resident Individual $305 $335 Each additional member $105 $135 Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 Birthday Party Packages/2 Hours 2018 2019 The Peak Package $100 $100 The Adventure Package $180 $180 The Family Birthday Adventure Package NA $280 The BIG Birthday Adventure Package NA $360 The Ultimate Birthday Adventure Package NA $540 Building Rentals/Non-Exclusive Rentals/Hr 2018 2019 Theater $250 $250 GOLF DOME EDINBOROUGH PARK 7 Theater with audio-visual equipment NA $300 Pool (swim team only)$55 $55 Pool Other $60 $60 Commercial Photo Shoot (hourly)2018 2019 Any park area blocked off $250 $250 Theater $250 $250 Youth Events 2018 2019 Little Dippers Dance NA $60 Family Events 2018 2019 Friday Movie Nights $7.50/Child $8/Child Family New Year's Eve Party Pre-registration $10.50/child $10.50/child Day of Party registration $11.50/child $11.50/child Not So Scary Halloween Party Pre-registration $10/Child $10/Child Day of party registration $11/Child $11/Child Contracted Programs 2018 2019 Stages Theater Company Varies Varies Three Rivers Park District Varies Varies Playpark Daily Admission 2018 2019 Resident and Non-Resident $7 $7.44 Children under 1 year Free Free Adults Free w/paid child Free w/paid child Group Reservation Rate $5 $6 Admission after 5 p.m. (summer only)$5.50 $5.50 Playpark - 10 Admission Pass 2018 2019 Resident and Non-Resident $65.10 $69.75 Playpark Annual Membership 2018 2019 Resident Individual $89.25 $95 Each additional member $68.25 $72.25 Non-Resident Individual $115.50 $122.50 Each additional member $94.50 $100 Total Facility Daily Admission 2018 2019 Resident $12.10 $12.55 EDINBOROUGH PARK "PLAYPARK" 8 Non-resident $12.10 $12.55 Merchandise for Resale 2018 2019 Socks $2.50 $3 Rental Concession Items 2018 2019 Paddle Boats - 4 person boat 1/2 hour $10 $15 Winter sled per hour $8 $8 Ice Skate $6 $6 Building Rentals 2018 2019 1/2 day - Salon M-TH $300 $300 1/2 day - Salon Sunday $450 $450 Weekend Rental - 6 hour period 2018 2019 Friday evening $1,195 $1,250 Saturday evening $1,195 $1,250 Amphitheater Rental 2018 2019 Amphitheater Rental $300 $300 Commercial Photo Shoot $50/hr.$50/hr. Champion Putting 2018 2019 9 hole $6 $6 18 hole $10 $10 Lawn Games 2018 2019 Per Court $20/hr.$20/hr. Fishing Clinic 2018 2019 Fishing Clinic $10 $12 Rates 2018 2019 Prime Hourly Rate (9/16 - 3/15)$234 $241 Prime Season Late Nite - after 9 p.m.$185 $185 Off-Season Non-Prime $170 $180 Off-Season Prime (Sun-Thurs Evening)$180 $185 Off-Season Late Night $145 $145 Off-Season Tournament NA $195 CENTENNIAL LAKES ARENA 9 In-Season Early Morning $170 $170 In-Season Organized Training Ice $100 $105 Early Morning/Undesirable Ice $100 $105 Backyard Rink Early Morning/Undesireable Ice $75 $75 Backyard Rink Prime $149 $150 Outdoor Rink EHA $143 $145 Outdoor Rink Day/Late Night $119 $120 Open skating (youth and adult)$5 $5 Skate Rental $3 $3 Developmental Skating (Ice & Hockey) Resident $8 $8 Developmental Skating (Ice & Hockey) Non-Resident $10 $10 Birthday Party Open Skating $99 $99 Room Rental $30 $30 Chair Rental $1/Chair $1/Chair Futsal $25 $25 Holiday Ice - Arena $284 $291 Holiday Ice - Backyard $199 $205 Tournament Headquarter Room $50/day $50/day Event Vendor Fee $50/event $50/event Fire Ice 10% discount 10% discount Memberships (set the first week of September)2018 2019 Open Skating Membership Resident Family: First 2 members $120 $120 Each additional member $10 $10 Maximum (7 persons)$165 $165 Resident Individual $110 $110 Non-Resident Family: First 2 members $130 $130 Each additional member $10 $10 Maximum (7 persons)$180 $180 Non-Resident Individual $120 $120 Open Skating Punch Card $50 $50 Skate Rental Punch Card (buy 10 get 1)$30 $30 Arena - Youth Activities 2018 2019 Non-School Day Youth Open Hockey $10/child $10/child Developmental Ice for hocky and Figure Skating Resident $8 $8 Developmental Ice for hocky and Figure Skating Non-Resident $10 $10 Developmental Skating Resident Punch Card (buy 10 get 1)$80 $80 Developmental Skating Non-Resident Punch Card (buy 10 get 1)$100 $100 Pro's Ice $10 $15 10 Pro's Ice Unlimited Pass $300/month $300/month Arena - Adult Activities 2018 2019 Adult Learn to Skate - 12 weeks, 30 minutes $151 $156 Skate School Class - 30 min.$11.25/class $12/class Skate School Class - 45 min.$16/class $17/class Skate School Class - 50 min.$17/class $17.50/class Skate School Class - 60 min.$22/class $22/class Summer Jump and Spin Class $18.25/class $19/class Adult Open Hockey $5 $5 Adult Open Hockey Punch Card (buy 10 get 1)$50 $50 Arena - Family Events 2018 2019 Skating in Santa Land $12 ($3 skate rental)$12 ($3 skate rental) Braemar Ice Show $5/child senior, $10/adult $5/child senior, $10/adult Hourly Rates 2018 2019 Full Field Prime (M-F 4-10 p.m./Sat and Sun 7 a.m.-10 p.m.) $381 $392 1/2 Field Prime (M-F 4-10 p.m./Sat and Sun 7 a.m.-10 p.m.) $190 $196 1/4 Field Prime (M-F 4-10 p.m./Sat and Sun 7 a.m.-10 p.m.) $95 $98 Late Nite $305 $315 70' Batting Cage $60 $60 50' Batting Cage $50 $50 70' Batting Cage - 1/2 hour $30 $30 50' Batting Cage - 1/2 hour $25 $25 Full Field Non-Prime $155 $155 1/2 Field Non-Prime $80 $80 1/4 Field Non-Prime $40 $40 Open Turf Time $5 $5 Fire Dome 10% discount 10% discount Individual Season Pass $100 $100 Field Punch Card $50 $50 Edina Athletic Association Rentals Hourly Rates (Baseball Football, Lacrosse and Soccer)2018 2019 Primetime - 5-10 p.m. - Jan.thru April, Mon. thru Fri.$360 $360 Primetime - 8 a.m.-10 p.m. - Jan. thru April, Saturdays $360 $360 Primetime - 8 a.m.-5 p.m. - Jan. thru April, Sundays $360 $360 Off Hours - All Other - Jan. thru April, All $288 $290 BRAEMAR FIELD (Dome) 11 Shoulder Season - All Hours - Oct. thru Dec.$329 $338 No Dome Public Field Rental (May 1 - Oct. 15)2018 2019 Residents - Full Field $65 $65 Resident - 1/2 Field $35 $35 Non-Residents - Full Field $100 $100 Non-Residents - 1/2 Field $50 $50 Braemar Field - Youth Activities 2018 2019 Tot Time $5/person/each time $5/person/each time Braemar Field - Adult Activities 2018 2019 Open Soccer $5/person/each time $5/person/each time Braemar Field - Family Events 2018 2019 Family Night at Braemar Field $5/person/each time $5/person/each time Open Dome Night at Braemar Field NA $5/person/each time Contracted Programs - Arena & Braemar Field 2018 2019 Braemar Skate School Varies Varies General Park Areas 2018 2019 Resident Use/hour $55 $55 Resident Use/day $145 $145 Commercial Use (i.e. TV)/hr.$90 $90 Commercial use with light/hr $145 $145 Showmobile/day $700 $700 Mobile Food Unit $30 $30 Maintenance/Custodial - per hour $40 $40 Athletic Fields - Residents Only 2018 2019 Per field - per day $142 $142 Per field , Per Hour Resident $55 $55 Per Field, Per Hour Non-Resident $65 $65 Per Field, Per Hour w/lights $79 $79 Turf Full Field (Pamela & Braemar) Per Hour, Resident $65 $65 Turf Full Field (Pamela & Braemar) Per Hour, Non-Resident $100 $100 Turf Half Field (Pamela & Braemar) Per Hour, Resident $35 $35 Turf Half Field (Pamela & Braemar) Per Hour, Non-Resident $50 $50 Maintenance/Custodial - per hour $40 $40 Athletic Association Clinics and Camps, Per Day, Per Field $50 $50 PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS 12 Athletic Association Tournaments Varies Varies Sand Volleyball Court - per day NA $70 Sand Volleyball Court - per hour NA $15 Van Valkenburg/Courtney Fields (residents only) 2018 2019 Per field/day includes building $170 $170 Rosland Park Pathway (Scheduled Walk/Run Events)2018 2019 Per Day $250 $250 Utley Park Fire Ring Rental (residents only)2018 2019 Fire Ring - per day $28 $28 ARNESON ACRES 2018 2019 Terrace Room & Gazebo - Residents Half-day (6 hours or less)$255 $255 Full-day (more than 6 hours)$355 $355 Terrace Room & Gazebo - Non-Residents Half-day (6 hours or less)$305 $305 Full-day (more than 6 hours)$405 $405 PICNIC SHELTER RENTALS (residents only)2018 2019 Chowen Park - half-day $30 $30 Chowen Park - full-day $46 $46 Sherwood Park - half-day $30 $30 Sherwood Park - full-day $46 $46 Wooddale Park - half-day $30 $30 Wooddale Park - full-day $46 $46 Utley Park - half-day $30 $30 Utley Park - full day $46 $46 Rosland Park - full-day ONLY $165 $165 PARK SHELTER BUILDINGS RENTALS (residents only)2018 2019 Cornelia School Park - half-day $75 $75 Cornelia School Park - full-day $110 $110 Countryside Park - half-day $75 $75 Countryside Park - full-day $110 $110 Pamela Park - half-day $75 $75 Pamela Park - full-day $110 $110 Todd Park - half-day $75 $75 Todd Park - full-day $110 $110 Walnut Ridge Park - half-day $75 $75 13 Walnut Ridge Park - full-day $110 $110 Weber Park - half -day $75 $75 Weber Park - full-day $110 $110 EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATIONS 2018 2019 Field user fee/participant $11 $13 Gymnaisum user fee/participant $11 $13 Outdoor hockey rink user fee/participant $11 $13 Inclusion Fee/participant $1 $1 Fees 2018 2019 Edina Senior Center Membership $20/$30 $20/$30 Trips & Tours $5 $5 Trips & Tours - Non-Members $7 $7 Defensive Driving $22/$25 $22/$25 Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Classes $20 $20 Osher Lifelong Learning Institute Classes - Non-Members $25 $25 Podiatrist $3/patient $3/patient Room Rental - New Fee Structure 2018 2019 Aquarium Room - Resident $25/hr $25/hr Aquarium Room - Non-Resident $30/hr $30/hr Classroom 2, 3 or 4 Resident (2 hr. min.)$40/hr $45/hr Classroom 2, 3 or 4 Non-Resident (2 hr. min.)$45/hr $50/hr Classroom 2, 3 or 4 Resident (more than 4 hrs.)$150 $170 Classroom 2, 3 or 4 Non-Resident (more than 4 hrs.)$200 $220 Grandview Room - Resident (2 hr. min.)$50/hr $55/hr Grandview Room - Non-Resident (2 hr. min.)$55/hr $60/hr Fireside Room Per Day - Resident $210 $230 Fireside Room Per Day - Non-Resident $240 $260 Fireside Room Per Hour - Resident (2 hr. min.)$60/hr $65/hr Fireside Room Per Hour - Non-Resident (2 hr. min.)$65/hr $70/hr Wall art display rental 15% of sale 15% of sale Activities 2018 2019 Edina Senior Golf League League Fee $14 $16 Weekly fee varies varies Lawn Bowling Clinic $4 $10 55+ Beginner Pickleball Lessons NA $25 Buddy Bingo NA $5 EDINA SENIOR CENTER 14 Classes 2018 2019 Agility Balance and Core Strength Class $30 $30 Gentle Yoga Full Length Class $11 $11 Gentle Yoga Full Length Class - Drop-in $13 $13 Gentle Yoga Shortened Class $7 $7 Gentle Yoga Shortened Class - Drop-in $9 $9 Senior Sit Fit Class $6 $6 Senior Sit Fit Class - Drop-in $8 $8 Tap Dance Class $5 $5 Tap Dance Class - Non-Member $6 $6 Mah Jongg Class $30 $30 Mah Jongg Class - Non-Member $35 $35 Canasta Class NA $30 Canasta Class - Non-Member NA $35 Class Pricing 2018 2019 Open Studio $3 $3 Youth, includes Art Academy $10.75 $11 Pottery $10.75 $11 Drawing and Painting $10.75 $11 Watermedia $10.75 $11 Photography $10.75 $11 Jewelry & Metals $10.75 $11 Liteary Arts and Dance $10.75 $11 Workshop Pricing 2018 2019 Workshops; any medium $14.75 $15 Room Rental 2018 2019 Margaret Foss Gallery Solo, two-four person show $150/Exhibit $250/Exhibit Group shows of 5 more more individuals $25/person/exhibit $35/person/exhibit Tea Room Gallery Solo, two person show $50/Exhibit $50/Exhibit Group shows of 3 or more individuals $100/person/exhibit $100/person/exhibit Classroom $100/day $100/day Personal studio $150/month $150/month Pottery Fees 2018 2019 Pottery Studio Maintenance Fees $4/per week $4/per week EDINA ART CENTER 15 Pottery Firing Fees $2.20/pound $2.20/pound Updraft Kiln Rental $250/firing $250/firing Pug Mill Rental $30/100# clay $30/100# clay Glaze Testing Fee $20/1000g batch $20/1000g batch Class Supply Fees 2018 2019 Supply Fees $4/per week $4/per week Model Fees Portrait Model Class $13/hr.$13/hr. Figure Model Class $20/hr.$20/hr. Birthday Parties 2018 2019 Drawing & Painting Birthday Parties 12+ participants $18/hr./person $200/12; $10 per add Pottery Birthday Parties 12+ participants $22/hr./person $240/12; $10 per add Gift Shop 2018 2019 Commission 40%40% Membership 2018 2019 Individual $42 $42 Family $60 $60 Contributing $51 - $99 $51 - $99 Sustaining $100 - $499 $100 - $499 Patron $500+$500+ Exhibiting Group Membership NA $150 Edina Resident Discounts 2018 2019 Class Pricing $5 off $5 off Membership 10%10% Gift Shop/Gallery No add'l discount No add'l discount Dated: December 4, 2018 State of Minnesota ) County of Hennepin ) SS City of Edina ) __________________________________ CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK City Clerk I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018 and recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _____ day of ____________________, 2018. Attest _________________________ ____________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 16 Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: V.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Human Rights and Relations Commission: Tom Oye Award Recipient Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: The Human Rights and Relations Commission will be present to recognize the Tom Oye Award recipient. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Casey Casella, City Management Fellow and Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2018-18 Amending Solar Zoning Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance 2018-18 amending the zoning City Code regarding solar energy systems. INTRODUCTION: The proposed Ordinance amends Chapter 36 of the Edina City Code to remove barriers to solar development. A public hearing will be held prior to the City Council's consideration for this Ordinance. Staff recommends the approval of the Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ord 2018-18 Solar Zoning Staff Report: Solar Zoning Ordinance Staff Presentation Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX ORDINANCE NO. 2018-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT REGARDING SOLAR ENERGY REGULATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article I., Section 36-10 is amended to add the following: Sec. 36-10 – Definitions. Solar Energy System: An energy system that consists of one or more solar collection devices, solar energy related “balance of system” equipment, and other associated infrastructure with the primary intention of generating electricity, storing electricity, or otherwise converting solar energy to a different form of energy. Solar energy systems may generate energy in excess of the energy requirements of a property if it is to be sold back to a public utility in accordance with applicable laws. Section 2. Chapter 36, Article XII., Section 36-1269 (General Requirements Applicable to all Districts) is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1269. - Energy collection systems setbacks and as a permitted accessory use. Facilities and equipment designed for the collection of solar energy or wind energy shall maintain the same setbacks as are required for principal buildings or structures and shall not be located within the front yard. Solar Energy Systems are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts. Section 3. Chapter 36, Article XII., Section 36-1457, Subdivision III (Screening) is amended as follows: Sec. 36-1457. - Required. The following uses shall be screened in accordance with the requirements of this subdivision with the exception of Solar Energy Systems. Solar Energy Systems are exempt from screening requirements. (1) Nonresidential principal buildings or structures, and any building or structure accessory thereto, shall be screened from lots in the R-1 district which are used for single dwelling unit buildings and which are located within 200 feet of the nonresidential use. The distance shall be the shortest distance between the Existing text – XXXX Stricken text – XXXX Added text – XXXX 2 nonresidential building or structure to be screened and the nearest lot line of the R-1 district lot, but shall not extend across a street; (2) Principal buildings or structures, or any building or structure accessory thereto, located in the Planned Industrial District or Planned Commercial District shall be screened from lots used for any residential purpose which are located within 200 feet. The distance shall be the shortest distance between the PID or PCD building or structure to be screened and the nearest lot line of the residential lot, but shall not extend across a street; (3) Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces and all loading facilities shall be screened from streets located within 50 feet, and from lots which are used for any residential purpose which are located within 50 feet. Said distance shall be the shortest distance between the parking facility or loading facility and the nearest part of the street or the nearest lot line of the residential lot; (4) Trash storage facilities, including recycling storage facilities, shall be screened from all lot lines and public road rights-of-way; and (5) All mechanical equipment accessory to any building, except single dwelling unit and double dwelling unit buildings, shall be screened from all lot lines and streets. Section 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon passage and publication. First Reading: December 4, 2018 Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: __________________________ ___________________________ Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk December 4, 2018 Mayor and City Council Casey Casella, City Management Fellow and Tara Brown, Sustainability Coordinator PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinance No. 2018-18 Amending Solar Zoning Information / Background: Solar PV, also known as solar electricity, uses sunlight to directly generate electricity harvested through solar panels. Utilizing solar is an important piece to achieving the community’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 30 percent by 2025. City of Edina staff are proposing updating the City Code on zoning to remove barriers to solar PV development for individual residents and businesses. By initiating this ordinance change, the City demonstrates its commitment to clean energy and ability to adapt operations and policies to allow the community to meet clean energy goals. Through the City’s involvement in the SolSmart Program, national experts from the Solar Foundation sent the City of Edina a zoning memorandum in July outlining the areas for improvement to the City’s zoning code to remove barriers to solar PV development. City of Edina Planning Department staff used these recommendations to draft an ordinance amendment. City staff presented a draft ordinance amendment to the Planning Commission on September 26, 2018. Key feedback on the draft ordinance from the Planning Commissioners were: • Remove the exemption of solar energy systems from building coverage. Staff removed the exemption from building coverage. Solar PV will still be subject to building coverage restrictions. • Check to ensure solar energy systems will be included in height restrictions of homes. Staff concluded solar energy systems are included in current City Code and no changes were necessary. The Planning Commission public hearing for the ordinance amendment was held on November 14, 2018. Commissioners did not have further feedback on the proposed ordinance language. One member of the community spoke at the public hearing in favor of the ordinance, speaking from personal experience of installing individual solar on his roof in the County Club neighborhood. REPORT / RECOMMENDATION Page 2 Staff recommends the following changes to the current zoning ordinance: • Definitions o Sec. 36-10 o Adding definition of “Solar Energy System” • Accessory Use o Sec. 36-1269 o State solar energy system are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts • Screening Code o Sec. 36-1457 o Exempt solar energy systems from screening code Please see Ordinance 2018-18 for full language. Recommended Action: Staff recommends granting First Reading to Ordinance 2018-18 amending the zoning City Code regarding solar energy systems. Ordinance No. 2018-18 Amending Solar Zoning Edina City Council 12/4/2018 Background •Goal: To ensure residents and businesses can utilize renewable technologies in Edina. EdinaMN.gov 2 SolSmart Program EdinaMN.gov 3 •Streamline a city’s zoning and inspection requirements and remove barriers to solar development •SolSmart assistance: recommended action to reduce language in zoning code that intentionally or unintentionally prohibit solar PV development. Proposed Ordinance Amendments Recommended changes: •Definitions •Sec. 36-10 •Adding definition of “Solar Energy System” •Accessory Use •Sec. 36-1269 •Solar energy systems are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts •Screening Code •Sec. 36-1457 •Exempt solar energy systems from screening requirements EdinaMN.gov 4 Planning Commission Feedback Sept. 26, 2018 Planning Commission feedback: •Remove exemption from building coverage. Solar will need to comply with all current building coverage restrictions •Interpretation of height restrictions (no changes necessary) Height restrictions will apply to Solar PV Nov. 14, 2018 Planning Commission Public Hearing highlights: •One resident spoke in favor of the ordinance changes EdinaMN.gov 5 Proposed Action •Dec. 4 Motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance 2018-18 amending the zoning City Code regarding solar energy systems •Dec. 4 Public Hearing for City Council •Dec. 18Ordinance 2018-18 consent for Second Reading. EdinaMN.gov 6 Questions EdinaMN.gov 7 Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner Item Activity: Subject:CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO JANUARY 8, 2019: 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Continue the public hearing to January 8, 2019 INTRODUCTION: The Planning Commission has not yet taken action on the Small Area Plan. They are expected to make recommendation to the City Council on December 12, 2018. Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.C. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2018-127, Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Variances at 4532 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2018-127 and grant first reading of the Ordinance. INTRODUCTION: On November 14, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requests. Vote: 4 Ayes and 3 Nays. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-127 Planning Commission Staff Report Draft - Planning Commission Minutes, November 14, 2018 Draft Ordinance No. 2018-19 Proposed Plans Site Plan & Setbacks Site Location and Small Area Plan Sections Traffic and Parking Study Engineering Memo Applicant Narrative Dated November 27, 2018 Correspondences Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2018-127 RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY REZONING, AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AT 4532 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Jamie and Casey Carl are requesting a redevelopment of an 8,971 square foot parcel at 4532 France Avenue. The applicants would tear down the existing 3,093 square foot single-family home that is currently occupied as office/retail and build a new two-story, 2,375 square foot retail/office building. The building would include a roof terrace with outdoor seating for employees. There would be eleven parking spaces provided in front and behind the building. Landscaping in front of the building would extend the landscape area on the site to the north. The site slopes down to the rear of the property, so the elevations on the west side would appear to be three stories to the residential uses to the west. 1.02 The request requires the following: 1. A Rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District. 2. Site Plan with the following Variances: Building Front Yard Setback from 35 feet to 31 feet. Side Yard Setback from 30 feet to 23 feet. Building Height from Two Stories and 24 feet to Two Stories and 30-38 feet. Parking Lot Front Yard Setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (existing condition) Side from 10 feet to 0 feet (existing condition) Rear Yard Setback from 10 feet to 4 feet. Parking Stall Variance from 15 to 11. 1.03 The property is legally described as follows: See attached Exhibit A. 1.04 On November 14, 2018 the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the proposal. Vote: 4 Ayes, 3 Nays. 1.05 On December 4, The City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-127 Page 2 Section 2. APPROVAL & FINDINGS NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the proposed Preliminary Re-Zoning and Preliminary Development Plan with Variances at 4532 France Avenue. 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, and designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. 3. The practical difficulty is the small lot size, the narrow width and lack of depth of the site. These conditions make any redevelopment difficult. The proposal is an improvement over existing conditions, which includes pavement that extends to the lot lines. Green space has been added along west lot line with arborvitae to provide screening of car headlights. There are existing trees on the lot to the west that provides additional screening. 4. The size of the building is reasonable for the site, and is smaller than the existing structure. 5. The proposal would remove a single-family home that is not consistent with the small area plan and replace it with a retail/office building that is similar to the new Gateway Bank development on the adjacent property to the north. 6. The overhead utility lines will be buried as part of the 4500 France development. 7. The project would provide a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere along the adjacent roadway, with a better connection to the new building. Bike racks and a seating area would be provided in front. Storefronts open toward France Avenue. 8. The proposed building setback is consistent with the structures on the block, which all include parking in front of the building, including the new Gateway Bank project to the north. 9. The parking stall variance is reasonable based on the parking study done by Spack Consulting and the availability of street parking and district parking at 4500 France Avenue. Additionally, the owners live a few blocks from the building and intend to walk to work. The retail business does not anticipate that Saturday would be the busiest day; which the parking study concludes would be the busiest day. The proposed parking is more in compliance with City Code than the existing conditions on the site. 10. A traffic study was conducted by Spack Consulting that concludes the existing roadway supports the project, and no improvements are necessary. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-127 Page 3 2.02 Approval is conditioned upon the following: 1. The Final Site Plan must be consistent with the Preliminary Site Plans dated November 7, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated November 5, 2018. 4. Provision of code compliant bike racks (5 minimum) near the building entrances. 5. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Submit a copy of the Hennepin County access permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the County’s requirements. 7. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent residential property and from France Avenue, per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 8. Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum lighting requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting shall be down lit. 9. The basement may not be used as office or retail space. 10. An eight (8) foot cedar fence must be installed along the west lot line and a portion of the south lot line to screen headlights and the trash collection area from the residential uses to the west. 11. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the traffic and parking study dated November 6, including moving the trash up on the France Avenue side for curbside pick up to minimize impact on the residential uses to the west. 12. Deliveries shall not occur between 7 pm and 7 am; unless the deliveries occur in the front of the building along France Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-127 Page 4 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on December 4, 2018. ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk November 14, 2018 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Variances for 4532 France Avenue. Information / Background: Jamie and Casey Carl are requesting a redevelopment of an 8,971 square foot parcel at 4532 France Avenue. The applicants would tear down the existing 3,093 square foot single-family home that is currently occupied as office/retail and build a new two-story, 2,375 square foot retail/office building. The building would include a roof terrace with outdoor seating for employees. There would be eleven parking spaces provided in front and behind the building. Landscaping in front of the building would extend the landscape area on the site to the north. The site slopes down to the rear of the property, so the elevations on the west side would appear to be three stories to the residential uses to the west. This site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as NN, Neighborhood Node, which has a height limit of 2-4 stories. (See portions of the Plan attached, including the guiding principles.) The applicant has responded to the guiding principles within their narrative. The site is currently zoned R-1, Low Density Residential, but is used as office/retail space. The existing use is nonconforming within the single-family home. Assessing records of the City indicate it has been an office use since the mid 1970’s. The home was built in 1924. There are no planning records that indicate the change in use. The request would require the following: 1. A Rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District. STAFF REPORT Page 2 2. Site Plan with the following Variances (See compliance table on page 7): Building Front Yard Setback from 35 feet to 31 feet. Side Yard Setback from 30 feet to 23 feet. Building Height from Two Stories and 24 feet to Two Stories and 30-38 feet. Parking Lot Front Yard Setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (existing condition) Side from 10 feet to 0 feet (existing condition) Rear Yard Setback from 10 feet to 4 feet. Parking Stall Variance from 15 to 11. The applicant has gone through the sketch plan process, and made the following changes based on the feedback from the Planning Commission and City Council: Reduced the size of the building from 10,000 square feet to 2,375 square feet. This was in response to the extreme shortage of parking at sketch plan. One site entrance to respond to Hennepin County access concerns. Added green space, landscaping and a pedestrian connection from the sidewalk along France Avenue. This area would match and expand the green space to the north. Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone, meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has discretion when reviewing this application. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Retail uses; zoned PCD-1, Planned Commercial District and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. Easterly: Retail uses in the City of Minneapolis. Southerly: Retail & Office uses; zoned POD, Planned Office District and guided NN, Neighborhood Node. Westerly: Single-Family homes; zoned R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District and guided Low Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is .21 acres (8,971 square feet) in size, and contains a two-story single family homes that has been occupied with retail and office uses since the 1970’s. Planning Guide Plan designation: NN, Neighborhood Node. Zoning: R-1, Single-Dwelling Unit District STAFF REPORT Page 3 Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Primary access points to the proposed development would be off France Avenue. The original proposal included two curb cuts off of France Avenue. The County indicated they would not approve two curb cuts; therefore, the applicant revised the plans. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project. The level of service at adjacent intersections would not be impacted. (See attached traffic study.) Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1312, a total of 15 parking stall would be required (see table below). The proposed plans would provide 11 parking stalls. Spack also did a parking study, which concludes that there would be adequate parking during the week, but there could be a three stall shortage on Saturday’s. The excess stalls needed could be accompanied by utilizing street parking on France Avenue or the stalls within the new project at 4500 France, which will serve as district parking. Additionally, the owners live a few blocks from the building and intend to walk to work. The retail business does not anticipate that Saturday would be the busiest day. As a comparison, the existing site has 12 parking stalls for a 3,000 square foot retail office space. Current Code would require 20 stalls based on the square footage, therefore, the existing site is short parked. Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 10 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans show that 7 overstory trees and a row of 22 arborvitae along the west lot line, proposed to provide screening of the parking lot (car lights) and the trash area. In addition, there would be a compliment of understory plantings along France. Additionally, staff recommends an eight (8) foot cedar fence be installed along the west lot line and a portion of the south lot line to ensure screening of headlights and the trash collection area from the residential uses to the west. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. A site improvement plan agreement would be required to outline public vs. private responsibilities and ownership for private improvement on public property. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be primarily brick and glass. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Trash Enclosures As mentioned previously, the trash would be screened from the adjacent property by the landscaping and cedar fence. Building Height The building height requirement for this site is 2 stories and 24 feet. (See attached building height overlay district map.) The applicant is requesting a variance from this standard. The building height proposed is 39 feet, including the elevator access to the roof. The small area plan calls for 2-4 stories on this site. (See attached.) The proposal is for a two story building consistent with the small area plan. The height of the two story portion of the building would be 30 feet, which is also consistent with the small area plan. Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile STAFF REPORT Page 5 parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The site is limited in its size to produce meaningful sidewalk improvements; however, the plan does provide an improved pedestrian sidewalk along France Avenue and a safe and improved pedestrian entrance to the new building. 44th & France Small Area Plan The applicant has designed a project following the guiding principles of the 44th & France Small Area Plan: Guiding Principle 1: Safe and Inviting The area should be safe for people of all ages and all backgrounds and should be a visually attractive and diverse place that encourages regular use and strengthens neighborhood identity. Guiding Principle 2: Community Gathering The small area should provide a place(s) for people to gather and spend leisure time, whether in a commercial or public location, and foster a community of learning. Flexible gathering space should be explored that can be programmed to accommodate a wide range of different uses. Guiding Principle 3: Circulation and Connections The area should provide attractive and easily identifiable infrastructure that accommodates convenient and safe movement for a variety of transportation modes, including bicycling, walking, and transit use. The area should also have safe and convenient non-motorized connections to nearby districts. Vehicle traffic should be managed to discourage cut-through traffic in adjacent residential neighborhoods. Guiding Principle 4: Neighborhood-Oriented Business Mix There should be a mix of businesses that provides goods and services to the neighborhood, including small offices and commercial uses. The amount and configuration of commercial space should be allowed to adjust in response to the market. Guiding Principle 5: Housing Housing should be provided in the study area to ensure choices for existing and future neighborhood residents. New types of housing may be provided, including multi-family dwellings (in mixed-use buildings with residential uses above ground level commercial or office space) or additional types such as courtyard housing, townhomes, and live/work housing. It is felt that the market will support the preferred housing types, which could include apartments and ownership options. Preferences should be the types that best support the city's affordable housing policy. STAFF REPORT Page 6 Guiding Principle 6: Height and Size of Buildings Building heights should be guided by the zoning ordinance. Additional height {up to four stories, at approximately 15 feet per story) may be considered, depending on their location and relationship to other buildings around them. {Building heights above the two story limit detailed in the existing zoning ordinance will be considered for approval if a developer agrees to implement study area-specific and project-specific improvements that are detailed in this small area plan's guiding principles, goals, and policies.) Guiding Principle 7: Parking Parking should be hidden from view behind or beneath buildings on the west side of France Avenue. The large parking lot with multiple owners between Sunnyside and 44th Street should be reimagined as a "community parking facility" 5 that accommodates parking for the study area (district). This community parking facility should be designed to double as gathering space and should have the flexibility to change over time, as other modes of transportation, such as ride- sharing, become more common and fewer parking spaces are needed. Guiding Principle 8: Streets and Sidewalks To create a gracious pedestrian environment, sidewalks should be widened as much as possible. Buildings should front onto the sidewalks, with few gaps and/or driveways breaking the street wall. Street trees and planters should be located between the curb and sidewalk. Furnishings should provide places to sit and dispose of trash and recycling. Vehicle traffic should be managed to maximize efficiency while maintaining safety for non-motorized users. Guiding Principle 9: Sustainability and Resiliency The 'urban forest' should be reestablished In the study area, and more efficient, district systems for managing storm water, harvesting energy and managing and recycling waste should be incorporated. Design for adaptability to changing needs and trends over time should be pursued. Guiding Principle 10: Visual Quality and Aesthetics in the Public Realm The public realm should include a high level of aesthetic treatments, such as enhanced sidewalk pavement, planters, and pedestrian level lighting. Utilities should not impede sidewalks and should be underground, where feasible. Property owners are expected to keep their properties economically viable and attractive until the market guides them to major changes. Guiding Principle 11: High Quality Design, High Quality Materials, Respect for Existing Aesthetics, and Innovations to Ensure Sustainability in the Private Realm High quality architecture is required in the study area, in terms of design, materials, and energy efficiency, which will contribute to sustainability. The design of remodeled and new buildings in the study area shall reflect attention given to balance, proximity, alignment, repetition, contrast and space. Materials used in the construction of remodeled and new buildings shall harmonize with materials and design features used in the area's existing structures. Innovated systems should be installed to help achieve energy efficiency. Although the site is very small, the applicant has attempted to address the above guiding principles. The proposal would remove a single-family home that is not consistent with the small area plan and replace it with a retail/office building that is similar to the new Gateway STAFF REPORT Page 7 Bank development on the adjacent property to the north. The overhead utility lines will be buried as part of the 4500 France development. The project would provide a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere along the adjacent roadway, with a better connection to the building. Landscaping would be expanded to increase greenspace along France Avenue. Bike racks and a seating area would be provided in front. Storefronts open toward France. The parking arrangement and green space in front would also be similar to the adjacent Gateway Bank project to the north. COMPLIANCE TABLE While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the underlying zoning: City Standard (PCD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – France Avenue Rear Side – North Side – South Parking Lot Setbacks Front – France Avenue Side – North Side – South Rear – West 35 feet 25 feet NA 30 feet 20 feet 5 feet 5 feet 20 feet 31 feet* 65 feet NA 23 feet* 0 feet* (existing condition) 0 feet* (existing condition) 0 feet* (existing condition) 4 feet* Building Height 2-stories & 24 feet 2 stories & 30 feet* 38 feet to the top of the elevator Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 .26 Parking 15 stalls 11 stalls* *Variance Required Variances The following Variances are requested: Building Front Yard Setback from 35 feet to 31 feet. Side Yard Setback from 30 feet to 23 feet. Building Height from two stories and 24 feet to Two Stories and 30-38 feet. Parking Lot Front Yard Setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (existing condition) Side from 10 feet to 0 feet (existing condition) Rear Yard Setback from 10 feet to 4 feet. Parking Stall Variance from 15 to 11. STAFF REPORT Page 8 Per the Zoning Ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the enforcement of the ordinance would cause practical difficulties in complying with the Zoning Ordinance and that the use is reasonable. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal does meet the variance standards, when applying the three conditions: Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The Proposed Variance will: 1) Relieve practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes the proposed variances are reasonable. The practical difficulty is the small lot size, the narrow width and lack of depth of the site. These conditions make any redevelopment difficult. The proposal is a vast improvement over existing conditions, which includes pavement that extends to the lot lines. Green space has been added along the west lot line with arborvitae to provide screening of car headlights. There are existing trees on the lot to the west that provide additional screening. The proposed building setback is consistent with the structures on the block, which all include parking in front of the building, including the new Gateway Bank project to the north. The parking stall variance is reasonable based on the parking study done by Spack Consulting and the availability of street parking and future district parking at 4500 France Avenue. The proposed parking is more in compliance with City Code than the existing conditions on the site. 2) There are circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self-created? Yes. As mentioned above, the unique circumstances are the location of the property adjacent to single- family homes, the small lot size, narrow width, lack of depth and the existing grade which drops 15 feet from east to west. These conditions were not created by the applicant. 3) Will the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The proposed new building would enhance the character of the neighborhood, as it is an improvement to the existing structure. The plans are consistent with the recent Gateway Bank development to the north. The parking areas would be improved by adding landscaping along France Avenue and the west lot line, where there is none today. Rezoning Per Section 36-216 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission is asked to consider all Rezoning requests subject to the following: (1) Is consistent with the comprehensive plan; The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The site is guided NC, Neighborhood Commercial. Offices are considered a permitted use. STAFF REPORT Page 9 The following are the development guidelines for NN, Neighborhood Node Category: Although the site is very small, the applicant has attempted to address the guiding principles. The proposal would remove a single-family home that is not consistent with the small area plan and replace it with a retail/office building that is similar to the new Gateway Bank development on the adjacent property to the north. The overhead utility lines will be buried as part of the 4500 France development. The project would provide a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere along the adjacent roadway, with a better connection to the building. Landscaping would be expanded to increase greenspace along France Avenue. Bike racks and a seating area would be provided in front. Storefronts open toward France. The parking arrangement and green space in front would be similar to the adjacent Gateway Bank project to the north. The density or floor area ratio proposed is much less than what would be allowed by City Code. (2) Will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The proposed project would not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The property would be well screened by proposed and existing landscaping to the uses to the west. (3) Will not result in an overly intensive land use; The proposal is one quarter of the square footage allowed on the site. The proposed building is 1,000 square feet less than existing structure on the site. (4) Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; The proposal is not an overly intensive land use. The Spack Consulting traffic study concludes the existing roadways would support the proposed use. Land Use Category General Description Development Guidelines Density Guidelines Neighborhood Node In general, small- to moderate-scale commercial, residential or mixed use buildings serving primarily the adjacent neighborhood(s). Primary uses encouraged are neighborhood- serving retail and services, offices, studios, institutional and residential. Building footprints generally less than 20,000 square feet (or less for individual storefronts). Parking is less prominent than pedestrian features. Encourage underground parking (for comparatively larger developments), district parking for smaller developments, and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize enhancement of the pedestrian environment. Encourage development to comply with the 44th and France Neighborhood Node Development Guidelines*: A. Building Height Limits Plan B. Building Frontage Guidelines C. Gathering Space Guidelines D. Site-Specific Guidelines E. General Guidelines Maximum residential density is 12+ dwelling units per acre (du/acre). (Densities are further constrained by the parameters of the Building Height Limits Plan*). Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) per zoning code. STAFF REPORT Page 10 (5) Conforms to the provisions of this section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and Other than the variances requested the project would conform to PCD-1 zoning regulations. While variances are requested, the conditions of the site would be improved. (6) Provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. The proposed project does have proper relationships between existing and proposed structures. Additional landscaping is proposed between adjacent properties. The pedestrian experience on France would be improved. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposed rezoning and development plan reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the NN, Neighborhood Node in the Comprehensive Plan, which allows for small scale retail and office uses. Rezoning the site to PCD-1, Limited Commercial is consistent with the adjacent zoning district to the north. 2. The building is relatively small and in scale with the existing building to the north. The design of the new structure is intended to blend into the neighborhood. 3. The existing roadways and proposed parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a parking and traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that no roadway improvements or parking improvements would be necessary as a result of the proposed plan. Adequate parking is available in the area. Additionally, the owners live a few blocks from the building and intend to walk to work. The retail business does not anticipate that Saturday would be the busiest day, as was the conclusion in the parking study. 4. Although the site is very small, the applicant has addressed the guiding principles. The proposal would remove a single-family home that is not consistent with the small area plan and replace it with a retail/office building that is similar to the new Gateway Bank development on the adjacent property to the north. The overhead utility lines will be buried as part of the 4500 France development. The project would provide a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere along the adjacent roadway, with a better connection to the building. Landscaping would be expanded to increase greenspace along France Avenue. Bike racks and a seating area would be provided in front. Storefronts open toward France. The parking arrangement and green space in front would be similar to the adjacent Gateway Bank project to the north. STAFF REPORT Page 11 5. The proposal meets the Variance criteria as highlighted on pages 7-8 within this report. Staff Recommendation Preliminary Rezoning to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District & Site Plan with Variances Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District, and Site Plan approval with Variances for 4532 France Avenue. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, and designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. 3. The practical difficulty is the small lot size, the narrow width and lack of depth of the site. These conditions make any redevelopment difficult. The proposal is an improvement over existing conditions, which includes pavement that extends to the lot lines. Green space has been added along west lot line with arborvitae to provide screening of car headlights. There are existing trees on the lot to the west that provides additional screening. 4. The size of the building is reasonable for the site, and is smaller than the existing structure. 5. The proposal would remove a single-family home that is not consistent with the small area plan and replace it with a retail/office building that is similar to the new Gateway Bank development on the adjacent property to the north. 6. The overhead utility lines will be buried as part of the 4500 France development. 7. The project would provide a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere along the adjacent roadway, with a better connection to the new building. Bike racks and a seating area would be provided in front. Storefronts open toward France Avenue. 8. The proposed building setback is consistent with the structures on the block, which all include parking in front of the building, including the new Gateway Bank project to the north. 9. The parking stall variance is reasonable based on the parking study done by Spack Consulting and the availability of street parking and district parking at 4500 France Avenue. Additionally, the owners live a few blocks from the building and intend to walk to work. The retail business does not anticipate that Saturday would be the busiest day, with STAFF REPORT Page 12 the parking study concludes would be the busiest day. The proposed parking is more in compliance with City Code than the existing conditions on the site. 10. A traffic study was conducted by Spack Consulting that concludes the existing roadway supports the project, and no improvements are necessary. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Site Plan must be consistent with the Preliminary Site Plans dated November 7, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies after the project is built. 3. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the city engineer's memo dated November 5, 2018. 4. Provision of code compliant bike racks (5 minimum) near the building entrances. 5. Submit a copy of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 6. Submit a copy of the Hennepin County access permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the County’s requirements. 7. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened from adjacent residential property and from France Avenue, per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 8. Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum lighting requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting shall be down lit. 9. The basement may not be used as office or retail space. 10. An eight (8) foot cedar fence must be installed along the west lot line and a portion of the south lot line to screen headlights and the trash collection area from the residential uses to the west. Deadline for a city decision: February 5, 2019 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 1 of 5 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Planning Commission Edina City Hall Council Chambers November 14, 2018 I. Call To Order Chair Olsen called the meeting to order at 7:06 PM II. Roll Call Answering the roll call were: Commissioners Miranda, Lee, Strauss, Melton, Hamilton, Bennett, Berube, Chair Nemerov. Staff Present: Cary Teague, Community Development Director, Kris Aaker, Assistant City Planner, Emily Bodeker, Assistant City Planner, Kaylin Eidsness, Senior Communications Coordinator, Liz Olson, Support Staff Absent from the roll call: Commissioners Thorsen, Mangalick, and Olsen III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Commissioner Hamilton moved to approve the November 14, 2018, agenda. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Commissioner Bennett moved to approve the October 24, 2018, meeting minutes as amended by Commissioner Lee. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. V. Special Recognitions And Presentations A. Advisory Board & Commission Minutes, Scott Neal • City Manager, Scott Neal, presented they City’s policy and procedures on meeting minutes. • The City is legally required to keep a written record and city staff are directed to follow the policy. • All Planning Commission meetings are televised and the City retains the videos as records. • Meeting minutes are used as a reference to the video of the meeting. B. 4100 W. 76th St., are the Proposed Plans Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 2 of 5 • Economic Development Manager, Bill Neuendorf, presented a proposed project at 4100 West 76th Street • This project would be included as part of a TIF plan to create a housing district by using legislation secured in 2014. • This project is proposing affordable housing and is in compliance with the comprehensive plan. Commissioner Hamilton made a motion to approve the resolution as modified by Commissioner Lee. Commissioner Miranda seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. VI. Public Hearings A. Staff Presentation, 5913 Hansen Road, Variance • Planner Bodeker presented a variance application for two variances at 5913 Hansen Road, Edina, MN. • Staff recommended approval of yard setback variance. • Staff recommended to deny first floor height elevation • Eric Zehnder appeared on behalf of the applicant. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Bennett moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Discussion/Comments/Questions Commissioners discussed the character of the neighborhood and discussed relying on the City Engineer and relying on their memo. A lengthy discussion was had regarding drainage and runoff with storm water. Motion Commissioner Strauss moved approval of the front yard setback and deny the first floor height elevation variance as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Lee seconded the motion. Aye: Miranda, Lee, Strauss, Hamilton, Nemerov Nay: Bennett, Berube Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 3 of 5 The motion carried 5-2. B. Staff Presentation, Solar Energy Systems Ordinance Amendments Planner Aaker presented the staff report for the Solar Energy Systems Ordinance Amendments which included the statement that utilizing solar is an important piece to achieve the community’s goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 30 percent by 2025. City of Edina staff is proposing updating the City Code on zoning to eliminate barriers to solar PV development. Public Hearing Jim Korslund, 4606 Casco Ave, stated that he lives in the Country Club district and supports the ordinance changes. Korslund explained that he installed his own solar installation in 2017 and has had substantial energy savings. Motion Commissioner Hamilton moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Bennett moved approval of the proposed ordinance changes as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Hamilton seconded the motion. The motion carries unanimously. C. Staff Presentation, Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Variances at 4532 France Avenue Director Teague presented the preliminary rezoning and preliminary development plan with variances at 4532 France Avenue, Edina, MN. Teague explained that Jamie and Casey Carl are requesting a redevelopment of an 8,971 square foot parcel at 4532 France Avenue. The applicants would tear down the existing 3,093 square foot single-family home that is currently occupied as office/retail and build a new two-story, 2,375 square foot retail/office building. Staff is recommending approval of the rezoning and the site plan with the variances as listed, subject to the findings and conditions in the staff report. Max Mooreland, Spack Consulting, introduced himself and gave a presentation on the traffic and parking study. Discussion/Comments/Questions There was a discussion about reducing the parking drive from two lanes to one lane in order to add another parking spot in the back and reducing the amount of hard surface. The process of rezoning was explained to the Planning Commission and that it is a two-step process. The 30 foot height of the building was discussed being in compliance with the zoning, but the elevator shaft goes above the 30 feet and does not trigger the give to get. Teague also explained that the Techny Arborvitae trees were considered comparable to the 3 additional required trees because of the abundance. There was a discussion around the proposed parking being more in compliance with city code than the existing conditions on the site. The footprint is smaller than the sketch plan Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 4 of 5 so the building is only short parked 4 stalls instead of 8 stalls. District parking was discussed and that it is on the work plan for next year. Appearing for the Applicant Matt Byers, with PLAAD, introduced himself and explained that the proposed plans included ADA access in the back because of the elevator access being in the back of the building and commented on the request to narrowing the driveway. Public Hearing None. Commissioner Hamilton moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Discussion/Comments/Questions Byers and Commissioners discussed the employee rooftop and the fact that it will not cause any noise issues due to the amount of employees. Casey Carl, owner of property, explained that the first floor retail portion plans to be a lifestyle boutique with men and women’s apparel, home goods, accessories, and gifts. Commissioners discussed the idea of setting the building closer to the front with more building square footage and less parking. The storm water was talked about and that it is being collected and discharged to the outlet towards the North West corner. The discussion continued and addressed the parking issue and that it may be dictating the project negatively. The idea of connecting with the neighbor’s parking lot on the north property line was brought up and explained that it was not a feasible solution. The 44th & France Small Area Plan was discussed, specifically contradicting the layout of the parking lot on the proposed building. The neighboring properties were also discussed and that they have front parking and that this project could be more cohesive with neighboring properties with the 3 parking stalls in front. Under parking and wider sidewalks were discussed to have a better pedestrian experience with the front of the building. District parking Motion Commissioner Hamilton moved approval of the Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan with Variances as outlined in the staff memo subject to the conditions and findings therein. Commissioner Bennett made a formal proposal to amend the motion to reduce the parking by 4 parking stalls, move the building back, and add more public realm. The motion failed. Commissioner Berube made a two part friendly amendment to approve the proposal and strongly encourage haste on community parking and that City Council to consider allowing the Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Page 5 of 5 applicant to remove the front parking and replace it with a warmer pedestrian public realm. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. Aye: Strauss, Hamilton, Berube, Nemerov Nay: Miranda, Lee, Bennett The motion carried 4-3. VII. Community Comment None. VIII. Reports/Recommendations None. IX. Correspondence And Petitions None. X. Chair and Member Comments Commissioners discussed the 4th Annual Edina Urban Symposium on Thursday, November 8, 2018. Commissioners also commented on electric vehicles and Edina’s land use connection with the wild fires in California. XI. Staff Comments Director Teague stated that the Southdale Open House for the Southdale Plan is on Monday, November 19, 2018 at the Public Work Building from 6:30 to 8:30 PM. Commissioners asked Teague about the Einstein and Caribou coffee time frame of the intersection improvement completion. Teague replied that he would need to discuss with Engineering and their coordination with the county. XII. Adjournment Commissioner Hamilton moved to adjourn the November 14 2018, Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission at 9:49 PM. Commissioner Strauss seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. 1 DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION DECEMBER 4, 2018. ORDINANCE NO. 2018 - 19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY ZONING MAP FROM R-1, SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT to PCD-1, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 36-402 is amended by rezoning from R-1 to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District the following described property located within the City of Edina: See attached Exhibit A. Section 2. The official zoning map of the City of Edina referred to and described in Section 36-402 of the Edina City Code shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the zoning map on file in the City Clerk’s office shall be appropriately marked for the purpose of indicating the rezoning provided for in this ordinance. Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage. First Reading: December 4, 2018 Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 1 4532 France Avenue Variance, Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan Submission 4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Resubmitted on:November 6, 2018 Originally Submitted on:October 15, 2018 Submitted to:City of Edina Community Development DepartmentPlanning Division plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Team Project Description Page 3 Pages 4 Supporting Attachments Survey Vicinity Map Architectural Site Plan Schematic Landscape Plan Architectural Plans Architectural Exterior Elevations Architectural Exterior Rendering Exterior Materials Variance Request Explanation Sustainable Development Questionnaire France Avenue Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions Civil Site Plan Proposed Grading and Erosion Control Plan Proposed Stormwater Plan Drainage Maps Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Attachment E Attachment F Attachment G Attachment H Attachment J Attachment K Attachment L Attachment M Attachment N Attachment O Attachment P plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 3 PROJECT TEAM Owner: Mr. and Mrs. Casey and Jamie Carl 4532 France Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota Architect: PLAAD, LLC Matthew Byers, AIA P.O. Box 184 Stillwater, MN 55082 651.336.1393 matt@plaadoffice.com Civil Engineering: Advance Surveying & Engineering Co. 17917 Highway 7 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION October 15, 2018 Dear City of Edina Planning Division, Thank you for the opportunity to submit a variance and rezoning request for a proposed development at 4532 France Avenue South in Edina, Minnesota. We are a Minnesota-based architectural firm with residential and commercial projects throughout the Twin Cities, Jackson, Wyoming and Copper Mountain, Colorado. In 2016, we successfully completed a 15-unit live/work development PUD in Jackson, Wyoming. In the following pages you will find what we believe to be a thoughtfully articulated, appropriately scaled and aesthetically compelling addition to the 44th & France Neighborhood. The property currently houses a single-family residential structure being used for various small businesses, and is currently zoned R-1. The new proposal described herein provides for over 3,000 sf of new retail and business space and includes a rooftop deck for use by the new proposed business residing in the building. We are requesting a rezoning to PCD-1 to support the proposed development. The property is targeted for redevelopment and rezoning in the new small area plan for the neighborhood and we feel that the proposed design effectively balances the need for a financially feasible development while addressing many of the goals of the small area plan guiding principles. Due to the narrow lot and the need to incorporate as much on-site parking as possible, a number of variances are requested in addition to, or in support of the rezoning request, specifically, in accordance with Section 36-617 of the Edina Zoning Code: 1) The front yard requires 38’-9” of setback (based upon the proposed height of the building). 31.4’ is proposed and requested. 2) As a result of the rezoning request from R-1 to PCD-1, a south side yard setback variance is needed and requested. In accordance with 36-618(2), as the new southern boundary of the PCD-1 district, a south side yard setback of 25’ is required. 22.9” is proposed and requested. 3) In accordance with 36-617(c), the height limitation in a PCD-1 zoned parcel in the HOD-2 overlay is 2 stories or 24’, whichever is less. This proposal, due to the proposed roof deck and required elevator access, is requesting a variance for a maximum building height of 38’-9” above the average existing grade at the front of the existing structure. This height occurs only at the elevator/egress stair penthouse. The remainder of the roof parapet is located at an elevation of 31’-3” above the average existing grade. 4) In accordance with Secs. 36-1311 & 36-1312, fifteen (15) spaces are required for the proposed retail and business uses. Eleven (11) are provided. This includes one ADA compliant stall with associated loading zone. A further explanation of the variance requests, supporting the variance application, is included herein as Attachment J. We sincerely thank you for your time and consideration, and look forward to answering any additional questions that you may have. You may reach me directly at 651.336.1393 or matt@plaadoffice.com. Sincerely, Matthew M. Byers, AIA, LEED AP BD+C plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 5 ATTACHMENT A Existing Survey France AvenueEXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION:That portion of Block 20, Waveland Park, an Addition to Minneapolis, bounded by a line described as follows:Beginning at a point of beginning on the West boundary line of France Avenue, which point is approximately 30feet West of the East line of Section 7, Township 28, Range 24, and 200 feet North of the South line of said Section7, Township 28, Range 24;running thence North along the West boundary line of France Avenue a distance of 60feet; thence at right angles West a distance of 150 feet; thence at right angles South a distance of 60 feet to a pointwhich is directly West of and 150 feet feet distant from the point of beginning; thence East to the point ofbeginning. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO FIX GAPS AND OVERLAPS:That portion of Block 20, Waveland Park, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block1, Mark Nelson First Addition; thence westerly along the North line of said Lot 1 a distance of 150.00 feet to a linethat is 150 feet West of the West line of France Avenue; thence northerly and parallel with the West line of saidFrance Avenue a distance of 60 feet to a line that is parallel with and 260 feet North of the South line of Section 7,Township 28, Range 24; thence easterly parallel with the South line of said Section 7 a distance of 150 feet more orless to the West line of said France Avenue; thence southerly along the West line of said France Avenue a distanceof 60.00 feet to the point of beginning. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.Showing the length and direction of boundary lines of the legal description listed above.The scope of ourservicesdoesnotincludedeterminingwhatyouown,which is a legal matter.Please check the legaldescriptionwithyourrecordsorconsultwithcompetentlegalcounsel,if necessary,to make sure that it iscorrectandthatanymattersofrecord,such as easements,that you wish to be included on the survey havebeen shown.2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey.3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of the property.4.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for the review of suchgovernmentalagenciesthatmayhavejurisdictionovertheserequirementstoverifytheyarecorrectlyshownbefore proceeding with construction.5.Showing elevations on the site at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site.Wehavealsoprovidedabenchmarkforyouruseindeterminingelevationsforconstructiononthissite.Theelevationsshownrelateonlytothebenchmarkprovidedonthissurvey.Use thatbenchmark and checkat leastoneotherfeatureshownonthesurveywhendeterminingotherelevationsforuseonthissiteorbeforebeginning construction.6.Wenotice thatthe existing legal description creates gapsand overlaps with the North and South properties.Asperourconversationwiththetitlecompanyinvolved,we have written a proposed description to close thosegaps and overlaps. The boundary line shown on the survey reflects the proposed legal description.7.Note that all building dimensions and building tie dimensions to the property lines,are taken from the sidingand or stucco of the building. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "●" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. # 42379 LICENSE NO. Thomas M. Bloom DATE S1AUGUST 17, 2017Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-7964 17917 Highway 7 Web: www.advsur.com SHEET 1 OF 1 40200 AUGUST 8, 2017 AUGUST 17, 2017 EXISTING HARDCOVERHouse 1,016 Sq. Ft.Bituminous 5,786 Sq. Ft.Concrete Surfaces 428 Sq. Ft.Ret. Walls 37 Sq. Ft.Wood Steps 15 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 7,282 Sq. Ft.AREA OF LOT 9,001 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 80.9% LEGEND plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 6 ATTACHMENT B Vicinity Map Neighborhood map, with subject property highlighted in green. Existing parking at neighboring building Existing parking at neighboring building plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 7 ATTACHMENT C Architectural Site Plan TRASH/RECY. 1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING ADJACENTBUILDING TO NORTH EXISTING ADJACENTBUILDING TO SOUTH FRANCEAVENUE PROPERTY LINE UP DN RETAIL STORAGE/BREAK WC DRESSING DRESSING 18'-0"PARKING21'-0"DRIVE AISLE16'-6"PARKING(PERMITTED WITH 1.5'BUMPER OVERHANG) T/FIN. FLOOR 100'-0"/906'-6" T/CONC. WALK906'-6" DN @16%DN @8%DN @8%8'-6"TYP.RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALLPROPERTY LINE PROPERTYLINE6'-0"WALK31.4' FRONT YARD SETBACK 22.9'SOUTH SIDE YARD SETBACK1'-0116" RET. WALL6" CURB13'-0"LANDSCAPINGBENCH BENCHBIKEPARKING5'-6"SIDEYARD SETBACKDN 4'-2116"UP ADAADA LOADING3'-0"LANDSCAPEHEDGE 25'-6" 8'-6"PARK 8'-6"PARK 8'-6"PARK 22'-834"DRIVE AISLE 5'-0" 66.7'REAR YARD SETBACK 6"CURB 18'-0"PARKING 6"CURB 4'-812"6"CURB PROVIDE STEEL GUARDRAIL AT TOP OF WALL © 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date November 6, 2018 2 11/01/2018 PlanningReview Revised311/06/2018 PlanningReview Revised RevisedArchitecturalSite Plan A0.1 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 8 ATTACHMENT D Schematic Landscape Plan TRASH/RECY. 1 SCHEMATIC LANDSCAPE PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING ADJACENTBUILDING TO NORTH EXISTING ADJACENTBUILDING TO SOUTH FRANCEAVENUE PROPERTY LINE 18'-0"PARKING21'-0"DRIVE AISLE16'-6"PARKING(PERMITTED WITH 1.5'BUMPER OVERHANG)T/CONC. WALK906'-6" DN @16%DN @8%DN @8% RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALLPROPERTY LINE PROPERTYLINE6'-0"WALK1'-0" RET. WALL6" CURB13'-0"LANDSCAPINGBENCH BENCHBIKEPARKINGDN UP ADAADA LOADING3'-0"LANDSCAPEHEDGE 25'-6" 8'-6"PARK 8'-6"PARK 8'-6"PARK 22'-834"DRIVE AISLE 5'-0" 6"CURB 18'-0"PARKING 6"CURB 6"CURB (4)S1 (2)P1 T1 PROVIDE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC& 3" ORGANIC MULCH LAYERIN PLANTING BED PROVIDE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC& 3" ORGANIC MULCH LAYERIN PLANTING BED T1 T1 T1 (4)S1 (4)S1(2)P1 (2)P1 T2 T2 T2 (22) T3 AS PRIVACY SCREENING PLANTING SCHEDULE QTY ID COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE HEIGHT T1 15' + S1 3' WIDTH 15' + 3' P1 MAPLE, AMUR ACER GINNALA4 12 6 4" DIA. B&B #5 CONT. T2 30' +15' +BLACK SPRUCE PICEA MARIANA3 4" DIA. B&B DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE DIERVILLA IONICERA T3 7'3'22 #7 CONT.HOLMSTRUP ARBORVITAE THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'HOLMSTRUP' 3'2-3'#1 CONT.PURPLE CONEFLOWER ECHINACEA PURPUREA © 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date November 6, 2018 2 11/01/2018 PlanningReview Revised311/06/2018 PlanningReview Revised SchematicLandscape Plan A0.2 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 9 ATTACHMENT E Architectural Plans 1 Walkout Level Plan 3/8" = 1'-0"1500 SF FOOTPRINT 1500 ELEVATORS, STAIRS,MECHANICAL, RESTROOMS,STORAGE NO PARKING REQUIRED RETAIL STORAGE MECH UP WC 41'-9"8'-3" 50'-0"9'-512"20'-612"© 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date October 15, 2018 Walkout LevelPlan A1.0 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 10 ATTACHMENT E Architectural Plans 1 Main Level Plan 3/8" = 1'-0"1500 SF FOOTPRINT245 SF ELEVATORS,STAIRS, MECHANICAL,RESTROOMS 1255 GFA RETAIL(MERCANTILE) USE9.5 PARKING SPOTSREQUIRED UP DN RETAIL STORAGE/BREAK WC DRESSING DRESSING 42'-9"7'-3" 50'-0"20'-11"9'-1"7'-5"5'-1"4'-5"8'-7"4'-7"3'-4"37'-6" © 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date October 15, 2018 Main Level Plan A1.1 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 11 ATTACHMENT E Architectural Plans 1 Upper Level Plan 3/8" = 1'-0"1500 SF FOOTPRINT380 SF ELEVATORS,STAIRS, MECHANICAL,RESTROOMS 1120 GFA RETAIL OFFICE(BUSINESS) USE5.60 PARKING SPOTSREQUIRED UP DN OPEN OFFICE COPY/PRINT WC 50'-0"30'-0"15'-3"6'-10"8'-4"19'-7"9'-11"7'-5"9'-4"© 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date October 15, 2018 Upper Level Plan A1.2 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 12 ATTACHMENT E Architectural Plans UP DN GREEN ROOF ROOF DECK 1 Roof Plan 3/8" = 1'-0" © 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date October 15, 2018 Roof Plan A1.3 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 13 ATTACHMENT F Architectural Exterior Elevations 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - EAST 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - WEST 1/4" = 1'-0" T.O. ASHPALT PARKING 906'-0" T/SUBFLOOR MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" / 906'-6" T/SUBFLOOR UPPER LEVEL114'-1 1/2" T/SUBFLOOR UPPER LEVEL 126'-8 1/4" T/LOWER PARAPET 130'-3" T/UPPER PARAPET 137'-9" T/CONC. LOWER LEVEL88'-8"/895'-2" BRICK VENEER PAINTED STEEL AWNING PAINTED WOOD TRIM RAIN GARDEN BRICK VENEER GREEN ROOF FIBER CEMENT PANEL WOOD PERGOLA PAINTED STEEL AWNING PAINTED STEEL TRIM ATWINDOWS, TYP. PAINTED STEEL TRIM ATWINDOWS, TYP. EXISTING AVERAGE GRADE AT FRONT 905'-6" © 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date November 6, 2018 2 11/01/2018 PlanningReview Revised311/06/2018 PlanningReview Revised ExteriorElevations A2.0 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 14 ATTACHMENT F Architectural Exterior Elevations 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" T.O. ASHPALT PARKING 906'-0" T/SUBFLOOR MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" / 906'-6" T/SUBFLOOR UPPER LEVEL114'-1 1/2" T/SUBFLOOR UPPER LEVEL 126'-8 1/4" T/LOWER PARAPET 130'-3" T/UPPER PARAPET 137'-9" T/CONC. LOWER LEVEL88'-8"/895'-2" BRICK VENEER FIBER CEMENT PANEL WOOD PERGOLA PAINTED STEEL AWNING PAINTED WOOD TRIM RAIN GARDEN © 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date November 6, 2018 2 11/01/2018 PlanningReview Revised311/06/2018 PlanningReview Revised ExteriorElevations A2.1 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 15 ATTACHMENT F Architectural Exterior Elevations 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION - SOUTH 1/4" = 1'-0" T.O. ASHPALT PARKING 906'-0" T/SUBFLOOR MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" / 906'-6" T/SUBFLOOR UPPER LEVEL114'-1 1/2" T/SUBFLOOR UPPER LEVEL 126'-8 1/4" T/LOWER PARAPET 130'-3" T/UPPER PARAPET 137'-9" T/CONC. LOWER LEVEL88'-8"/895'-2" BRICK VENEER GREEN ROOF FIBER CEMENT PANEL WOOD PERGOLA PAINTED STEEL AWNING PAINTED WOOD TRIM RAIN GARDEN © 2018 PLAAD, LLC. ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING HEREIN CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF PLAAD, LLC, AND THE SAME MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF PLAAD, LLC. Consultants Civil Advance Surveying &Engineering, Co.17917 Highway 7Minnetonka, MN 55345 Casey and Jamie Carl4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Name Planning Review Certification Sheet Number Sheet Title No.Date Description 1 10/15/2018 Issue Chart PlanningReview Owner Project 4532 France4532 France Avenue SouthEdina, Minnesota Issue Date November 6, 2018 2 11/01/2018 PlanningReview Revised311/06/2018 PlanningReview Revised ExteriorElevations A2.2 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 16 ATTACHMENT G Architectural Exterior Rendering Street view from France Avenue, looking southwest plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 17 ATTACHMENT H Exterior Materials Painted steel awning Painted fiber cement panelingBrick veneer plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 18 ATTACHMENT J Variance Request Explanation Variance Request ExplanationDue to the narrow lot and the need to incorporate as much on-site parking as possible, a number of variances are requested in addition to, or in support of the rezoning request, specifically, in accordance with Section 36-617 of the Edina Zoning Code: These following variance requests satisfy the required conditions required by Minnesota Statues and Edina Ordinances as described below. Variance Request #1 As a result of the rezoning request from R-1 to PCD-1, a south side yard setback variance is needed and requested. In accordance with 36-618(2), as the new southern boundary of the PCD-1 district, a south side yard setback of 25’ is required. 22.9” is proposed and requested. The Proposed Variance (listed above) will: Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonableThe relatively narrow width of the lot makes providing the necessary required parking for the reasonably-sized retail and business development (2,375 sf of GFA) impracticable. In order to avoid prohibited dead-end parking, one-way circulation on both sides of the building is required. This has the effect of pushing the building south. In a typical PCD-1 zoned parcel, this would not pose an issue, as the side yard setbacks are not imposed unless the parcel represents the border of a PCD-1 district. However, as this new proposed PCD-1 parcel will constitute the new southern boundary of the PCD-1 district, a 25’ south side yard setback is required. Respecting this side yard setback, while providing the necessary clearances for one-way vehicular circulation on both the north and south sides of the building would leave approximately 20’ of width to place a building. This is not feasible. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning districtPlease see previous answer. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinanceThe recently completed small area plan encourages a rezoning of the parcel to PCD-1 zoning and a modest increase in density. Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhoodThe existing neighborhood, as a result of the small area plan, is a neighborhood actively being developed into mixed-use commercial and retail spaces. Therefore, the requested variance does not alter this character, but rather, helps to implement the small area plan’s objectives. Variance Request #2 Increase the maximum permitted height from 24’ to 38’9”.In accordance with 36-617(c), the height limitation in a PCD-1 zoned parcel in the HOD-2 overlay is 2 stories or 24’, whichever is less. This proposal, due to the proposed roof deck and required elevator access, is requesting a variance for a maximum building height of 38’-9” above the average existing grade at the front of the existing structure. This height occurs only at the elevator/egress stair penthouse. The remainder of the roof parapet is located at an elevation of 31’-3” above the average existing grade. The Proposed Variance (listed above) will: Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonableIn addition to needed ceiling heights for the first floor retail space and to create a desirable second level business space, the owner is proposing a roof deck to enhance the ambiance and aesthetic qualities of the surrounding neighborhood. This is a stated goal of the small area plan. However, an elevator and egress stair are required, necessitating a variance for overall building height. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning districtPlease see previous answer. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinanceThe recently completed small area plan encourages a rezoning of the parcel to PCD-1 zoning and a modest increase in density and encourages amenities to enliven the ambiance of the neighborhood. Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhoodThe existing neighborhood, as a result of the small area plan, is a neighborhood actively being developed into mixed-use commercial and retail spaces with a mixture of indoor and outdoor spaces. Therefore, the requested variance does not alter this character, but rather, helps to implement the small area plan’s objectives. Variance Request #3 The front yard requires 38’-9” of setback (based upon the proposed height of the building). 31.4” is proposed and requested. The Proposed Variance (listed above) will: Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonableAs a direct result of Variance Request #2, the required front yard setback is increased to 38’-9”. However, with the goal of providing as much parking as possible on the site while maintaining a reasonably sized GFA footprint (2,375 of GFA), the building needed to push towards the front lot line. This permits two rows of parking at the rear of the lot separated by a drive aisle. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning districtPlease see previous answer. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinanceThe recently completed small area plan encourages a rezoning of the parcel to PCD-1 zoning and generally bringing the new buildings in the district closer to the street. Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhoodThe existing neighborhood, as a result of the small area plan, is a neighborhood actively being developed into mixed-use commercial and retail spaces closer to the front lot lines. Therefore, the requested variance does not alter this character, but rather, helps to implement the small area plan’s objectives. Variance Request #4 In accordance with Secs. 36-1311 & 36-1312, fifteen (15) spaces are required for the proposed retail and business uses. Eleven (11) are provided. This includes one ADA compliant stall with associated loading zone. The Proposed Variance (listed above) will: Relieve practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance and that the use is reasonableEven with the relatively small development footprint, the proposed development requires 15 parking spaces. With the narrow width of the lot and the required vehicular circulation clearances, only 11 spots are able to be provided. plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 19 ATTACHMENT J Variance Request Explanation Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property but not applicable to other property in the vicinity or zoning districtPlease see previous answer. Be in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the zoning ordinanceThe intent of the zoning ordinance is to ensure adequate parking for tenants and visitors. The proposed development will be an owner-occupied building within a short walking distance of their home. The business space on the second level will be used to serve the administrative needs of the retail space on the main level. No more than 3-4 full-time employees will be on site at any given time. Furthermore, after many years of successfully operating a similar retail establishment a few blocks north of this site, the owner can attest that no more than 2-3 people are in the store at any given time. The owners have, in accordance with the requirements of the rezoning and variance requests, engaged a third-party parking study. Not alter the essential Character of a neighborhoodThe existing neighborhood, as a result of the small area plan, is a neighborhood actively being developed into mixed-use commercial and retail spaces, that encourages multi-modal transportation options. Therefore, the requested variance does not alter this character, but rather, helps to implement the small area plan’s objectives. plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 20 ATTACHMENT K Sustainable Development Questionnaire SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT QUESTIONNAIRE Sustainable Design & Energy Have you utilized Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance and/or Centerpoint Energy’s Builder and Developer programs for this development? As we are in the early stages of schematic design, we have not yet engaged Xcel Energy or Centerpoint Energy. However, the developer fully intends to utilize these programs during the development of the project. Will the buildings meet SB2030 energy goals and/or will they be Energy Star certified? If not, please share the steps you are taking to support energy conservation.While the developer is not intending to meet the standards required for compliance with SB2030, they will seek Energy Star certification. Will you be optimizing the roof by installing a green roof?The developer has expressed interest in developing a portion of the roof as an extensive green roof. Will there be any renewable energy generation on site?The developer is performing a life-cycle assessment on the costs of installing photovoltaic panels over approximately one-quarter of the roof. Will there be purchase of renewable energy credits (RECs)?The developer is currently investigating the feasibility of this strategy. What percent of the property is pervious surface before the redevelopment?What is the percent post development?Based upon the survey dated August 17, 2017, performed by Advance Survey & Engineering, the total existing impervious hardcover is 7,282 sf. With a lot size of 9,001 sf, this represents a pervious cover percentage of 19% (1,719 sf) and an impervious cover percentage of 81% (7,282sf). The planting areas represent 582sf of pervious surface. The proposed extensive green roof represents an additional 387 sf of pervious surface for a total new pervious surface coverage of 969sf, or 10%. If necessary, the developer can consider the use of pervious pavers under the parking stalls to improve this percentage. What new services will be pervious? (i.e. Sidewalks, driveways, overflow parking)Currently, the design team is researching pervious pavers at all parking stalls. How will the landscaping support the natural ecosystem? (i.e. Rain gardens, % native plants, % bee friendly pollinator plants)At the front entry area, we are proposing a rain garden to help collect and filter stormwater runoff. We will be investigating native plantings and bee-friendly pollinator plants. Furthermore, we will be working to divert roof drain runoff into above-ground cisterns to collect rainwater for use as landscape irrigation water. What percent of the property is covered by tree canopy before redevelopment?What is the percent post development?Currently, due to a substantial amount of borrowed canopy coverage from the neighboring properties, the site has about 30% canopy coverage. A large tree just over the property line to the south currently contributes to the canopy coverage. Given that the proposed redevelopment is only two stories tall, and the new proposed development is pulled back off of the southern property line, this canopy will remain. There will be a few trees that will need to be removed at the north property line, but we propose to replace those with new trees in the front yard setback of the property. We will attempt, as much as possible, to match the existing canopy cover. Will you be replanting/replacing trees at least four to five inches in diameter to positively impact the tree canopy (ordinance requirement is only 2.5 inches in diameter)? Yes. The new trees shown in the front yard setback will be at least 4-5 inches in diameter. Will a recycling service be provided to all businesses on site?Yes Will an organic (i.e. food waste) recycling service be provided to all businesses on site?To the extent that it is necessary with incidental food waste for the office uses on site, we will investigate the options available to us. Will there be bike parking near main entrance for guests? Yes. Do you have EV Charging Stations for owners or guests to use?Yes, one space will be reserved. Will there be parking spaces provided for car-sharing vehicles to reduce the overall number of cars?Due to the limited parking available on site, no. plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 21 FRANCE AVENUE AREA WORKING PRINCIPLES AND SUPPORTING QUESTIONS Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district principles. How does the proposal contribute to the realization of the principles for the district?The proposed redevelopment provides a thoughtfully articulated two-story mixed-use commercial building that aesthetically enhances and unifies the overall district image using traditional building materials, and programmatically provides desired retail and business space. How can the proposal move beyond the principles for the district? What tangible and intangible outcomes might be offered by the proposal but cannot be achieved by the project on its own?We believe that the City wants the site redeveloped, as evidenced by its inclusion in the small area plan. With the current residential structure on the site, the site is not being put to its best potential use. The site, however, is narrow compared to its neighbors in the district. Due to the 60’ width and two-way drive aisle minimums, a maximum of 32 parking spaces would be possible if the entire ground level was developed as a parking lot. This is neither practical from a development standpoint, nor desirable from a public experience concern. In order to develop a project that is financially feasible and one which we feel will beneficially augment the character of the district, we are proposing providing three parking spots at the front of the building and an additional 9 spots in the rear of the site. In a current political and cultural environment that is actively pushing for alternative methods of multi-modal transportation, providing fewer parking spaces will encourage the use of alternative mass-transit options. What does the proposal offer as a way of balancing those outcomes provided by others?The first floor of the proposed development will primarily house an established and proven retail business focused on home furnishings, along with real estate offices. The pedestrian traffic encouraged by both of these businesses will add to the economic vitality of the district. What alternatives were explored to arrive at a proposal that is best aligned with the principles and the opportunities of the district?This proposal represents the fifth iteration of the design. The development team was initially interested in achieving four floors of development on the site with underground parking. With the progression of the small area plan over the course of the last few months, and recognizing the investment required to achieve only 10 parking spaces underground (after clearances, aisle widths and turning radii were calculated), the development team considered a structure with parking at grade at the rear of the site and a building with a mixed height profile: three stories at France Avenue and two stories at the rear of the site. In this scheme, with parking at the rear of the site, vehicular access was needed on both sides of the building to facilitate logical parking access and prevent dead-end parking. While this was beneficial from a site circulation viewpoint, it limited the amount of impervious surface we would have been able to provide. Finally, better understanding the desires of the City with the small area plan that was adopted, the development team re-envisioned the project as a two-story project with a walk-out lower level and roof deck. Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. Discuss the materials and construction techniques intended for the building and the site with attention directed to ensuring an enduring quality is achieved, especially considering whether the proposal is a background or foreground element of the district.The building is proposed to be clad in brick with thoughtful fenestration and surface articulation. Large windows will permit access to daylight for the interior spaces and help activate the pedestrian experience with unobstructed views into the retail space. Divided lites in the windows and a steel protective canopy over the entry walkways will help relate the larger openings down to the human scale. Landscaping in the front yard will provide much needed pervious surface and help to soften the edge condition of the property. What qualities of the proposal will be most valued by the community in 50 years? As a traditional two-story brick building with hints of cleaner, modern lines and materials (the steel entry canopy and pergola on the roof deck) the proposed structure will have an enduring aesthetic that will age gracefully and not date itself to any particular decade. Describe the ways in which the proposal highlights human activity in the building and on the site, especially when viewed from adjacent or nearby public ways?As mentioned above, the large windows will allow the public a clear view into the first floor retail spaces of the building. The large widows on the second floor will communicate the business activity occurring on the second floor, while the partially vegetated roof deck at the front of the building will introduce additional visual interest to the district. In what ways does the proposal enhance the economic vibrancy of the district?The proposed building is a mixed-use structure, with retail on the ground floor and business offices on the lower walk-out and second levels. This diversity of uses is critical to ensuring a long-term viability of the project. How does the proposal adapt itself to changing economic opportunities of the community and the district?The relatively open floor plan will allow the building to adapt to changing market demands. Should market forces favor one use over another, there would be little difficulty in making the necessary changes to the spaces to allow flexibility of uses. Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district. Describe the ways in which the proposal is self-supporting related to on- and off-site infrastructure and resources.The developer is undertaking a life-cycle cost analysis on installing photovoltaic panels over roughly one-quarter of the roof area. Coupled with LED lighting, occupancy sensors and large south-facing windows, the developer is attempting to reduce demand to the existing electrical grid. The project will connect into existing public utilities below France Avenue, and storm water will be managed on site to meet city requirements, such that there is no peak increase in net flow to neighboring properties. What impacts does the proposal pose on existing on- and off-site infrastructure?Please see above response. What elements of the proposal support infrastructure needs of adjacent or nearby sites?None. Describe the infrastructure features of the proposal that are truly extraordinary by relating the performance of those features to current standards, requirements, or best practices.We are not able to comment in detail at this stage of the design process. How the proposal relies on infrastructure of the district for baseline performance?We are not able to comment in detail at this stage of the design process. Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facilitating movement of people within and to the district. ATTACHMENT L France Avenue Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 22 What features and amenities does the proposal lend to the public realm of the district?The developer is proposing placing bike racks on the site and will be investigating the potential of creating one EV charging/parking station. Furthermore, a garden and concrete walkway connecting the front entry to the building to the sidewalk will create an inviting retail experience in the front. What features and amenities does the proposal introduce to extend the sense of an expansive and engaging public realm to its site?Ground level retail and site lighting will help to enliven the pedestrian experience Demonstrate the ways in which the proposal supports pedestrians and bicyclists movement and identify those nearby district features that are important destinations.Bicycle parking will be provided near the front to the proposed building. The curb cut and concrete valley gutter at the entrance will employ markings to alert motor vehicle operators of the crossing bike and pedestrian paths What features does the proposal employ to ensure a safe and inviting pedestrian experience on the site?Please see previous answer. Additionally, a concrete entry walk will provide separation between the building entrances and asphalt drive area. Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without “leftover” spaces on sites. How does the proposal relate in terms of scale to it neighbors?The proposed development is two levels above grade with a walk-out lower level at the back of the site. The existing property to the south contains a two-level structure, and the property to the north houses a one-level retail development. How does the proposal make full use of the available site, especially those portions of the site not occupied by parking and buildings?The front yard setback on the east will be planted with trees, native and pollinator-friendly plants. This area will be utilized to help mitigate storm water run-off. The side yard setbacks provide circulation to additional parking in the rear of the site. How does the proposal interact with its neighbors? Describe the zones of activity created by the proposal and compare those areas to zones of activity on adjacent and nearby sites.Providing a few parking spaces in front of the retail space, accessed directly off of France Avenue, is absolutely critical to the success of the retail business. The parking on either side of the proposed development is also located in the front yard setback, accessed directly off of France Avenue. The front face of the new proposed building is located very close to the front face of the existing structure on site as well as the existing neighboring buildings on the north and south. The proposed development sits near the southern end of the district. One additional commercial parcel exists to the south of the proposed development, after which, the neighborhood quickly transitions to single-family residential. We feel that since the immediately adjacent neighboring building to the north is relatively new, and set back with parking in the front, it would not make sense to have our proposed development pulled closer to the street. This would reduce visibility for existing vehicles from their parking lot, but also create a stepped street presence with the buildings, negating the desire for a gradual transition from the higher density intersection of Sunnyside Road and France Avenue to the residential properties to the south of the proposed development. Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves. How does this proposal enhance key elements of environmental health (air, water, noise, habitat)?We will be investigating native plantings and bee-friendly pollinator plants. Furthermore, we will be working to divert roof drain runoff into above-ground cisterns to collect rainwater for use as landscape irrigation water. A partially vegetated roof will assist in reducing heat-island effects and capturing storm water and the developer is investigating photovoltaic panels on the roof as a method for partially offsetting demand on the local power grid. How does proposal mitigate any negative impacts on environmental health on its own site?Please see previous answer. How does proposal provide for a healthful environment beyond the current condition?Please see previous answer. Describe ways in which human health needs are advanced by the proposal.With a narrow floor plate and large windows on the south side, natural daylight will penetrate deep into the retail and office spaces. While the potential heat gains can be mitigated with coatings and shading devices, the natural daylight and operable windows for all employees is incredibly important to mental and physical health. Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and anticipated problems. Identify the problems posed by the proposal or the district requiring innovative solutions and describe the ways in which the proposal responds?In accordance with the size of the proposed building, 15 parking spaces are required. As a result of narrow width of the lot, the proposed design provides 11 parking spaces. As part of the rezoning and variance applications, a parking study is currently in process. Without flexibility on parking requirements, the site becomes financially infeasible and undevelopable, except as a surface parking lot. Describe the metrics to be used to compare the innovations posed by the proposal.N/A at this time For those solutions posed by the proposal as innovative, describe how they might become “best practices” for the district.N/A at this time Describe innovations in systems and aesthetics and the ways in which systems and aesthetics for integrated solutions.N/A at this time Describe other projects where innovations similar to those included in the proposal have been employed.N/A at this time Promote well-balanced aggregations of “come to” and “stay at” places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. How does the proposal complement the mix of uses in the district? The 44th and France business area is rich with a mix of retail, small business and hospitality establishments. The proposed development’s retail business will provide much desired additional economic vitality. Describe the proposal in terms of “come to” and/or “stay at” places.The first floor of the proposed development will primarily house an established and proven retail business focused on home furnishings, along with real estate offices. The pedestrian traffic encouraged by both of these businesses will add to the economic vitality of the district. What adjacent or nearby “come to” or “stay at” places does the proposal rely on for vitality?The on-site employees will add to the local population that support the local businesses on a regular basis. ATTACHMENT L France Avenue Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 23 ATTACHMENT L France Avenue Area Working Principles and Supporting Questions Demonstrate the flows of activity generated by the site during a typical weekday and weekend day. In what ways does the proposal interact with surrounding sites to encourage an engaging public realm?During the weekday, the main level retail space will be welcoming patrons throughout the day. The employees will be coming and going, perhaps enjoying lunch or dinner on the rooftop patio dedicated to the users of the building. The main level retail space will be welcoming customers and walk-ins throughout the weekend. Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. Describe the proposal in terms of its economic contributions to the district.The on-site employees of the proposed development will add to the local population that support the local businesses on a regular basis. How does the proposal enhance development on adjacent or nearby sites?This proposal enhances the development opportunities on adjacent or nearby sites by holding a high standard of design and best use on the smaller sites available in the district. Our proposal provides the desired mixed-use, bringing more people into the district to support new development. What features of the site or district limit the potential of the proposal from being fully realized?The site provides many challenges due to its limited size. The development team has thoughtfully created a proposal that enhances, without maximizing, the site to its best use. Why is the proposal best situated on its proposed site from the perspective of economic vitality?The proposed uses and tenants in this proposal will provide continued services and support to the district as well as Edina as a whole. How does the proposal make the district and the community a better place?The proposal will provide a first-class, timeless and approachable building that compliments the historic nature of the district. The full-time employees will support the surrounding restaurants and retail shops and service offerings. The scale of the building enhances and supports the vision of the district. plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 24 ATTACHMENT M Civil Site Plan France Avenue 906.50 895.50 EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION:That portion of Block 20, Waveland Park, an Addition to Minneapolis, bounded by a line describedas follows: Beginning at a point of beginning on the West boundary line of France Avenue, whichpoint is approximately 30 feet West of the East line of Section 7, Township 28, Range 24, and 200feet North of the South line of said Section 7, Township 28, Range 24;running thence North alongthe West boundary line of France Avenue a distance of 60 feet; thence at right angles West adistance of 150 feet; thence at right angles South a distance of 60 feet to a point which is directlyWest of and 150 feet feet distant from the point of beginning; thence East to the point of beginning. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO FIX GAPS AND OVERLAPS:That portion of Block 20, Waveland Park, described as follows: Beginning at the northeast corner ofLot 1, Block 1, Mark Nelson First Addition; thence westerly along the North line of said Lot 1 adistance of 150.00 feet to a line that is 150 feet West of the West line of France Avenue; thencenortherly and parallel with the West line of said France Avenue a distance of 60 feet to a line that isparallel with and 260 feet North of the South line of Section 7, Township 28, Range 24; thenceeasterly parallel with the South line of said Section 7 a distance of 150 feet more or less to the Westline of said France Avenue; thence southerly along the West line of said France Avenue a distanceof 60.00 feet to the point of beginning. SCOPE OF WORK & LIMITATIONS:1.Showing thelength and direction of boundarylines of thelegal description listed above.Thescopeofourservicesdoesnotincludedeterminingwhatyouown,which is a legal matter.Pleasecheckthelegaldescriptionwithyourrecords orconsultwith competent legalcounsel,ifnecessary,to makesurethatitiscorrectandthat any mattersof record,such aseasements,thatyou wish to be included on the survey have been shown.2.Showing the location of observed existing improvements we deem necessary for the survey.3.Setting survey markers or verifying existing survey markers to establish the corners of theproperty.4.Showing and tabulating impervious surface coverage of the lot for your review and for thereviewofsuchgovernmentalagenciesthatmayhavejurisdictionovertheserequirementstoverify they are correctly shown before proceeding with construction.5.Showing elevations on thesiteatselectedlocations togive someindicationof thetopographyofthesite.We have also provided a benchmark for your usein determining elevations forconstructiononthissite.The elevations shown relateonlyto the benchmark provided on thissurvey.Use that benchmark and check atleast one other feature shown on the surveywhendetermining other elevations for use on this site or before beginning construction.6.We notice that the existing legal description creates gaps and overlaps with the North andSouthproperties.As perourconversation with the title company involved,we havewritten aproposeddescriptiontoclosethosegapsandoverlaps.The boundaryline shown on thesurveyreflects the proposed legal description.7.Notethatall building dimensions and building tie dimensionsto theproperty lines,aretakenfrom the siding and or stucco of the building.8.Whileweshow aproposedlocationfor thishomeoraddition,we are notas familiarwithyourproposedplansasyou,yourarchitect,or thebuilderare.Reviewour proposed location of theimprovementsandproposedyardgradescarefullytoverifythattheymatchyourplansbeforeconstructionbegins.Also,we are notas familiarwithlocalcodesand minimum requirementsasthelocalbuildingandzoningofficialsinthiscommunityare.Besuretoshowthissurveytosaidofficials,or anyotherofficialsthat mayhave jurisdiction overthe proposed improvementsandobtaintheirapprovalsbeforebeginningconstructionorplanningimprovementstotheproperty. STANDARD SYMBOLS & CONVENTIONS: "●" Denotes iron survey marker, set, unless otherwise noted. EXISTING HARDCOVERHouse 1,016 Sq. Ft.Bituminous 5,786 Sq. Ft.Concrete Surfaces 428 Sq. Ft.Ret. Walls 37 Sq. Ft.Wood Steps 15 Sq. Ft. TOTAL EXISTING HARDCOVER 7,282 Sq. Ft.AREA OF LOT 9,001 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 80.9% # LICENSE NO. DATE C1NOVEMBER 6, 2018 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-7964 17917 Highway 7 Web: www.advsur.com SHEET 1 OF 4 20'10'0 DATE DRAFTED:NOVEMBER 6, 2018# 52716Joshua S. Rinke AUGUST 8, 2017DATE SURVEYED: SURVEYED BY ADVANCED SURVEYING. & ENG., CO. PROPOSED HARDCOVERBuilding 1,558 Sq. Ft.Concrete Surfaces 6,526 Sq. Ft.Ret. Walls 314 Sq. Ft. TOTAL PROPOSED HARDCOVER 8,398 Sq. Ft.AREA OF LOT 9,001 Sq. Ft. PERCENTAGE OF HARDCOVER TO LOT 93.3% CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (B612)1 2 3 1 1 1 1 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2 2 RETAINING WALL 3 3 3 3 3 4 CONCRETE ADA RAMP 4 4 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 22 2 4 2 1 1 1 11 3 plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 25 ATTACHMENT N Proposed Grading Plan France Avenue 906.50 895.50 # LICENSE NO. DATE C2NOVEMBER 6, 2018 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-7964 17917 Highway 7 Web: www.advsur.com SHEET 2 OF 4 20'10'0 DATE DRAFTED:NOVEMBER 6, 2018# 52716Joshua S. Rinke AUGUST 8, 2017DATE SURVEYED: SURVEYED BY ADVANCED SURVEYING. & ENG., CO. GRADING & EROSION CONTROL NOTES: BEFORE DEMOLITION AND GRADING BEGINInstall silt fence/bio roll around the perimeter of the construction area. Sediment control measures must remain in place until final stabilization has been established and thenshall be removed. Sediment controls may be removed to accommodate short term construction activitybut must be replaced before the next rain. A temporary rock construction entrance shall be established at each access point to the site and a 6 inchlayer of 1 to 2 inch rock extending at least 50 feet from the street into the site and shall be underlainwith permeable geotextile fabric. The entrance shall be maintained during construction by top dressingor washing to prevent tracking or flow of sediments onto public streets, walks or alleys. Potentialentrances that are not so protected shall be closed by fencing to prevent unprotected exit from the site. Contractor shall install inlet protection on all existing storm sewer inlets in accordance with the citystandard details. Inlet protection shall also be provided on all proposed storm sewer inlets immediatelyfollowing construction of the inlet. Inlet protection must be installed in a manner that will not impoundwater for extended periods of time or in a manner that presents a hazard to vehicular or pedestriantraffic. DURING CONSTRUCTION:When dirt stockpiles have been created, a double row of silt fence shall be placed to prevent escape ofsediment laden runoff and if the piles or other disturbed areas are to remain in place for more than 14days, they shall be seeded with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111 at 100lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. A dumpster shall be placed on the site for prompt disposal of construction debris. These dumpstersshall be serviced regularly to prevent overflowing and blowing onto adjacent properties. Disposal ofsolid wastes from the site shall in accordance with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements. A separate container shall be placed for disposal of hazardous waste. Hazardous wastes shall bedisposed of in accordance with MPCA requirements. Concrete truck washout shall be in the plastic lined ditch and dispose of washings as solid waste. Sediment control devices shall be regularly inspected and after major rainfall events and shall becleaned and repaired as necessary to provide downstream protection. Streets and other public ways shall be inspected daily and if litter or soils has been deposited it shallpromptly be removed. If necessary, vehicles, that have mud on their wheels, shall be cleaned before exiting the site in the rockentrance areas Moisture shall be applied to disturbed areas to control dust as needed. Portable toilet facilities shall be placed on site for use by workers and shall be properly maintained. If it becomes necessary to pump the excavation during construction, pump discharge shall be into thestockpile areas so that the double silt fence around these areas can filter the water before it leaves thesite. Temporary erosion control shall be installed no later than 14 days after the site is first disturbed andshall consist of broadcast seeding with Minnesota Department of Transportation Seed Mixture 22-111at 100 lb/acre followed by covering with spray mulch. Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractorshall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins and additional silt fencing as deemednecessary to control erosion. SITE WORK COMPLETION:When final grading has been completed but before placement of seed or sod an “as built” survey shallbe done per City of Edinarequirements to insure that grading was properly done. When any remedial grading has been completed, sod or seeding shall be completed including anyerosion control blankets for steep areas. When turf is established, silt fence and inlet protection and other erosion control devices shall bedisposed of and adjacent streets, alleys and walks shall be cleaned as needed to deliver a site that iserosion resistant and clean. Contractor shall maintain positive drainage of a minimum 2% slope away from proposed building. plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6 2018 Page 26 ATTACHMENT O Proposed Stormwater Management Plan France Avenue 906.50 895.50 # LICENSE NO. DATE C3NOVEMBER 6, 2018 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-7964 17917 Highway 7 Web: www.advsur.com SHEET 3 OF 4 20'10'0 DATE DRAFTED:NOVEMBER 6, 2018# 52716Joshua S. Rinke AUGUST 8, 2017DATE SURVEYED: SURVEYED BY ADVANCED SURVEYING. & ENG., CO. plaadPLAAD, LLC | P.O. Box 184, Stillwater, MN 55082 | www.plaadoffice.com4532 France Avenue Proposed Development November 6, 2018 Page 27 ATTACHMENT P Proposed Drainage Maps France AvenueFrance Avenue 906.50 895.50 # LICENSE NO. DATE C4NOVEMBER 6, 2018 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345Phone (952) 474-7964 17917 Highway 7 Web: www.advsur.com SHEET 4 OF 4 20'10'0 DATE DRAFTED:NOVEMBER 6, 2018# 52716Joshua S. Rinke AUGUST 8, 2017DATE SURVEYED: SURVEYED BY ADVANCED SURVEYING. & ENG., CO. I hereby certify this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By: _________________________ Max Moreland, P.E. License No. 52665 Date: _November 6, 2018__________ Traffic & Parking Study 4532 France Avenue Edina, Minnesota Traffic Impact Study i 4532 France Executive Summary Background: A proposed redevelopment is located at 4532 France Avenue South in Edina, Minnesota. The purpose of this study is to determine the traffic impacts associated with the build out of the proposed development on the study roads and intersections where significant impact is anticipated. Results: The principal findings of this study are: • The proposed 4532 France redevelopment is expected to generate 64 new trips during an average weekday, 4 new trips during the a.m. peak hour and 7 new trips during the p.m. peak hour. • All roadways and intersections are forecast to have acceptable queues and delays with the addition of traffic from this development. • Adequate vehicle parking will be provided on site for a majority of the time based on the parking analysis. The site may have more retail parking demand than capacity during Saturday peak hours, in which case overflow parking of approximately three vehicles can be handled on-street. Recommendations: The following items are recommended based on the analyses contained in this study: • Including bicycle parking on site. • Properly grade the curbs around the ADA loading space to allow full use of the ADA loading area by a wheelchair. • Move the trash to allow for curbside pickup on France Avenue. This study is based upon a concept development plan titled “4532 France” and dated November 1, 2018. Assuming the general characteristics of the proposed development remain approximately the same as documented, minor changes in the final design are not expected to alter the results or recommendations of this study. Traffic Impact Study ii 4532 France TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................... 1 2. Existing Conditions .................................................................. 3 3. Forecasted Traffic ..................................................................... 4 4. Analyses .................................................................................... 6 5. 44th & France Small Area Plan ................................................ 13 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................... 15 7. Appendix .................................................................................. 16 LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS Table 1 – Study Corridor Characteristics ...................................................................... 3 Table 2 – New Trip Generation ....................................................................................... 4 Chart 1 – Study Corridor Volume to Capacity ............................................................... 7 Chart 2 – A.M. Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections ............................. 8 Chart 3 – P.M. Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections ............................. 8 Chart 4 – Southern Access A.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections ................................................................................................. 9 Chart 5 – Southern Access P.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections ................................................................................................. 9 Table 3 – Peak Period Parking Demands ..................................................................... 10 Traffic Impact Study 1 4532 France 1. Introduction a. Proposed Development A proposed redevelopment is located at 4532 France Avenue South in Edina, Minnesota. Following are key attributes of the proposed development: i. Access to the site will be provided via one driveway on France Avenue per the concept development plan shown in the Appendix. ii. The proposed development will include 1,500 square feet of retail space, and 1,500 square feet of office space. iii. 11 parking stalls are proposed for the site. iv. The development is expected to be fully occupied by 2020 for the purposes of this study. b. Purpose of Study The purpose of this study is to determine the traffic impacts associated with the build out of the proposed development. The traffic impacts are studied on the roads and intersections where significant impact is anticipated, and improvements are recommended where mitigation is needed. For those not familiar with the general concepts and terms associated with traffic engineering, The Language of Traffic Engineering guide is included in the Appendix. c. Study Objectives The objectives of this study are: i. Document how the study intersections and roadways currently operate. ii. Forecast the amount of traffic expected to be generated by the proposed development. iii. Determine how the study intersections and roadways will operate in the future with and without the proposed development. iv. Recommend appropriate mitigation measures if poor operations are identified. v. Review multi-modal facilities surrounding the site. vi. Review the proposed parking supply for the site. The roadways corridors studied in this document include those surrounding the proposed site, which are: i. France Avenue South ii. Sunnyside Road For the purposes of this traffic study, the study intersections closest to the proposed development and where the greatest impact is expected were chosen for review and include: i. France Avenue South & Sunnyside Road ii. France Avenue South & Site Access Traffic Impact Study 2 4532 France It should be noted traffic expected from the proposed development will have minor impacts on other corridors and intersections beyond those studied here. Furthermore, this study does not account for the existing roadway conditions such as pavement quality or appropriate drainage. Traffic Impact Study 3 4532 France 2. Existing Conditions a. Corridor Characteristics As mentioned, the proposed site is located at 4532 France Avenue South. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the key roadway corridors around this site and within the study area. Table 1 – Study Corridor Characteristics Name Designation1 Classification2 Speed Limit Lanes Transit3 Peds/ Bicycles France Avenue CSAH 17 A-Minor Augmentor 30 mph 2 undivided 1 route 4 buses Sidewalks both sides Sunnyside Road Local Collector 30 mph 2 undivided None Sidewalks both sides 1 CSAH = County State Aid Highway 2 Metropolitan Council Functional Classification Map 3 Number of routes around the proposed site followed by the frequency of transit service during the peak periods. b. Traffic Volumes Intersection video was collected at the France Avenue/Sunnyside Road intersection under normal weekday conditions in May 2018. Using these videos, 48-hour turning movement counts were obtained at the existing study intersection. The data from the two days was averaged to provide the base traffic for a “typical weekday.” The average weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours were found to be from 7:30 to 8:30 a.m. and 4:45 to 5:45 p.m. The counts from these two peak hours were used at the study intersections for analysis. The turning movement count data from the counts are contained in fifteen-minute intervals in the Appendix. Based on the “typical day” turning movement volumes, the current daily traffic volumes on each study corridor are: i. 10,900 vehicles per day on France Avenue north of Sunnyside Road ii. 13,000 vehicles per day on France Avenue south of Sunnyside Road iii. 2,800 vehicles per day on Sunnyside Road west of France Avenue iv. 3,700 vehicles per day on Sunnyside Road east of France Avenue Traffic Impact Study 4 4532 France 3. Forecasted Traffic a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the development site based on the methods published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Trip generation rates are provided by the ITE manual as well as local data collected by Spack Consulting. The ITE manual compiles studies from across the country to provide a national average traffic for various land uses. Spack Consulting collects current average traffic volumes for various land uses in the Twin Cities regional area for use in our studies. Local data is considered more relevant than the ITE national data as it is generally newer and accounts for our area’s specific characteristics. Per the procedure in the Trip Generation Manual, local trip generation data is used when possible and supplemented with national ITE data when local data is not available. For each analysis, the raw trip generation was divided among three types of trips – new, pass-by, and internal. Pass-by trips are those vehicles already on the roads which will stop at the development site in the future. For this development, pass-by trips only apply to the retail portion. Internal trips are those vehicles within the site visiting both locations within the site. New trips represent traffic increasing the overall number of vehicles at the intersections. The resultant new trips generated by the proposed development are shown in Table 2 based on both the ITE data and Spack Consulting data. A detailed trip generation table showing the exact breakdowns is provided in the Appendix. Table 2 – New Trip Generation Land Use Code – Source1 Description & Size Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out In Out In Out 710 - ITE General Office (1500 sq. ft) 7 7 1 0 0 1 876 - ITE Retail-Apparel Store (1500 sq. ft) 32 32 1 0 2 2 Total (ITE) 39 39 2 0 2 3 Local General Office (1500 sq. ft) 3 3 1 0 0 1 Local Small Box Store (1500 sq. ft) 29 29 2 1 3 3 Total (Local) 32 32 3 1 3 4 1 Local = Trip generation data collected by Spack Consulting in this regional area. Traffic Impact Study 5 4532 France As shown in Table 2, the trip generation forecasts based on both ITE and Spack Consulting data are relatively close. Since it is better to use local data when available, the trip generation based on local rates is used in the analysis. A trip distribution pattern was developed for the generated traffic going to and from the proposed development. This pattern is based on the existing traffic volumes, site access, competing land uses, and access to the regional transportation system. The general trip distribution pattern for this study is: i. 40% of the generated traffic to/from the north on France Avenue ii. 40% of the generated traffic to/from the south on France Avenue iii. 10% of the generated traffic to/from the west on Sunnyside Road iv. 10% of the generated traffic to/from the east on Sunnyside Road Traffic generated by the site development was assigned to the area roadways per this distribution pattern. b. Non-site Traffic Forecasting To forecast future traffic volumes for the future build-out year of 2020 in the study area, traffic changes from outside of the proposed development’s traffic were considered. Using MnDOT’s provided AADT volume history, the past roadway volumes along the study intersection were examined. These volumes show relatively stable volumes with recent decreases along France Avenue and recent increases along 44th Street. From this information, a conservative 1.0% annual growth rate was applied to the existing volumes to generate the forecast year 2020 traffic volumes (2% growth total). This growth was applied to all existing movements in the study network. Additionally, traffic forecasts from the nearby proposed 4500 France development were also included in the study area. c. Total Traffic Traffic forecasts were developed for the 2020 Build scenarios by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development to the non-site forecast volumes. Peak hour forecasts are shown in the capacity analysis section of the Appendix. Traffic Impact Study 6 4532 France 4. Analyses a. Corridor Vehicular Analysis While many factors contribute to a road feeling congested, the two biggest factors are volume, how many vehicles are using the road, and capacity, how many vehicles the road can accommodate a day. Transportation professionals use these pieces of information to create a ratio of volume to capacity. For example, a road with a volume to capacity ratio of 1.0, where the traffic demand is nearly equal to the traffic supply, will feel congested to motorists. Below is a rough guide of the daily traffic volumes different types of roads can accommodate based on Exhibits 16-16 and 12-39 of the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition. If the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume on a roadway is below the threshold, then it is considered un-congested. If the daily volume falls inside the range, the road is almost congested, and if the daily volume is over the threshold the road is congested. • 2-Lane (one in each direction with left turn lanes at busy intersections and coordinated signals), undivided street, are considered congested with a volume between 8,900 to 18,300 vehicles per day. • 4-Lane, undivided street (two in each direction with left turn lanes at busy intersections and coordinated signals), – 18,600 to 36,800 vehicles per day. To provide an initial planning level screening, Chart 1 provides volume to capacity ratios of the study corridors during each of the study scenarios to determine if any of the roadway corridors are candidates for additional through lanes. As shown, on a planning-level analysis, the study roadways can accommodate the expected increase in traffic. The results also show a minimal increase in daily traffic volumes to the projected year 2020 compared to existing volumes. Traffic Impact Study 7 4532 France Chart 1 – Study Corridor Volume to Capacity b. Intersection Vehicular Analysis Individual intersections can perform poorly during peak periods while the overall roadway corridor is operating with an uncongested daily volume to capacity ratio lower than 1.0. Therefore, capacity analyses are performed for the study intersections to determine if they need improvements such as turn lanes or an upgrade in traffic control. The existing and forecasted turning movement volumes along with the existing intersection configurations and traffic control were used to develop the average delay per intersection in each study scenario. The delay calculations were done in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition using the Vistro software package. The full calculations for each study scenario, including Level of Service (LOS) grades and queue lengths, are included in the Appendix. Also, included in the Appendix is a guide explaining the Level of Service grade concept. Chart 2 (a.m. peak hour) and Chart 3 (p.m. peak hour) show the average peak hour delay per traffic signal-controlled intersection for each study scenario. The LOS D/E boundary of 55 seconds of delay per vehicle is considered the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable traffic signal operation in Congested: volume/capacity of 1.0 or greater 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 France Ave north of 44th St France Ave south of Sunnyside Rd Sunnyside Rd west of France AveVolume to Capacity RatioExisting 2020 Build Series7 Nearing congestion: volume/capacity of 0.85 Traffic Impact Study 8 4532 France Minnesota. The initial signal timing for the existing conditions was provided by the City of Minneapolis. Chart 2 – A.M. Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections Chart 3 – P.M. Peak Hour Delays: Signal Controlled Intersections Chart 4 (a.m. peak hour) and Chart 5 (p.m. peak hour) show the 95th percentile queue lengths on the busiest stop sign controlled approach at intersections with side street stop sign control. Average delays are not calculated for intersections with side street stop sign control because the vast majority of vehicles going through the intersection are on the main roadway and have zero delay, which leads to low overall average delays. At side street stop sign controlled approaches to busy roadways, the average delay for all the vehicles on the Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (55 seconds) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 France Ave & Sunnyside RdAverage Dealy (seconds)Existing 2020 Build Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (55 seconds) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 France Ave & Sunnyside RdAverage Dealy (seconds)Existing 2020 Build Traffic Impact Study 9 4532 France approach often exceeds 60 seconds. This can be the case for a few vehicles waiting at the stop sign where improvements would not be justified for the low traffic volume. Based on our experience, improvements are not warranted at these types of intersections until the 95th percentile queue at a stop sign is in the five to ten vehicle range. Chart 4 – Southern Access A.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections Chart 5 – Southern Access P.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections Unreasonable 95th Percentile Queue (5 Vehicles) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Site Access95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing 2020 Build Unreasonable 95th Percentile Queue (5 Vehicles) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Site Access95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing 2020 Build Traffic Impact Study 10 4532 France c. Vehicular Mitigation Analysis Per the above analyses, all the study intersections and corridors will operate acceptably throughout the study scenarios. No additional intersection modifications are needed to accommodate traffic from the development. d. Automobile Parking Forecasting & Analysis Parking to be Provided on Site On-site automobile parking will be provided in surface parking stalls. A total of 11 automobile stalls are planned; three in front of the building and eight behind the building. Parking Required by Edina Code For retail areas, City code dictates eight parking spaces for the first 1,000 square feet plus six parking spaces for each additional 1,000 square feet up to 15,000 square feet. For 1,255 gross square feet of retail, the retail portion of the site requires a total of 9.5 parking stalls to meet City requirements. For office areas, City code gives a formula of gross floor area divided by 200 to determine the number of spaces required. For 1,120 gross square feet of office, 5.6 spaces are required for the office portion of the site. Altogether, the site requires 15 parking spaces to meet City code. Expected Parking Demand - ITE The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) has put together a document, ITE Parking Generation, 4th Edition, that compiled parking demand data from different land uses. Using that data, peak period parking demands were calculated for each land use of this development for a non-Friday weekday, a Saturday, and a Sunday. Those peak period parking demands are summarized in Table 3. Table 3 – Peak Period Parking Demands Land Use Peak Period Vehicle Parking Demand Weekday Saturday Sunday General Office 4 n/a n/a Retail – Apparel Store 2 14 1 As seen in Table 3, the forecast parking at peak times during the weekday will be able to be contained within the 11 planned parking stalls. The retail parking may exceed the provided 11 spaces during the Saturday peak times by three vehicles. These vehicles will likely utilize on-street parking across the street on France Avenue. Traffic Impact Study 11 4532 France e. Concept Site Plan & Multi-Modal Review The concept site plan contained in the Appendix was reviewed to determine if the plan meets city requirement’s, provides appropriate circulation, and minimizes conflicts. Following are key transportation elements of the concept site plan: i. Vehicle Circulation: The site is proposed to have one access point on France Avenue. The current site has one access point on France Avenue, so there will be no change in the number of curb cuts at the site. Vehicles exiting the three parking spaces in the front of the building will need to reverse across two lanes of interior site traffic, but with low vehicle volumes forecast for the site, this is not anticipated to be a significant issue. Three parking spaces will be in the front of the building and eight will be in the rear. The eight spaces behind the building include an ADA space with a loading area. The trash/recycling area will be used as a turnaround spot for any vehicles that enter the rear parking area and are unable to find an available spot. ii. Bicycle and Pedestrian Infrastructure: The site plan shows maintaining the existing sidewalks along France Avenue with the new development. The walkway from the France Avenue sidewalk to the front of the building is shown to be six feet wide which is of sufficient width to give good access from the building to the sidewalk. The front of the building will be connected to the rear of the building with a sidewalk along the north side of the building. This walkway will include stairs. Access to the building is also provided on the rear of the building. This accessible entrance will lead to an elevator to allow full ADA access to the building. Any curb between the walkway adjacent to the ADA loading space will need to be graded appropriately to allow full use of the ADA loading area by a wheelchair. Bicycle parking is not required for this development according to Edina City Code because that the amount of parking proposed is less than 20 stalls. However, it is recommended that bicycle parking be included on site and there is an area on the site plan in the front of the building designated for bicycle parking. iii. Loading: Loading zones are not explicitly denoted in the attached site plan. However, loading could occur curbside on France Avenue. If loading were to occur within the site, loading vehicles would need to reverse into the site off of France Avenue which is not a recommended movement. To avoid a Traffic Impact Study 12 4532 France garbage collection vehicle backing into the site access from France Avenue, the trash will need to be moved to allow for curbside pickup on France Avenue. With the 16% grade from the rear parking area, a dumpster moving tool may be needed to accomplish this. It is recommended that all loading on site be encouraged to occur outside of peak periods (7:00 to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) to reduce potential conflicts. Based upon the above review of the concept site plan’s transportation elements, the following is recommended: i. Including bicycle parking on site. ii. Properly grade the curbs around the ADA loading space to allow full use of the ADA loading area by a wheelchair. iii. Move the trash to allow for curbside pickup on France Avenue. Traffic Impact Study 13 4532 France 5. 44th & France Small Area Plan In February of 2018 the City of Edina released a draft of the Small Area Plan for the City of Edina’s 44th & France Neighborhood Node. This plan is intended to “chart a course for future change for the Edina portion of this larger node and an implementation program for shaping and managing public and private investment”. The plan includes a number of guiding principles and general guidelines, several of which touch on transportation. The following section looks at the transportation aspects of the plan and focuses on how this development fits into them. Guiding Principle 3: Circulation and Connections The area should provide attractive and easily identifiable infrastructure that accommodates convenient and safe movement for a variety of transportation modes, including bicycling, walking, and transit use. The area should also have safe and convenient non-motorized connections to nearby districts. Vehicle traffic should be managed to discourage cut-through traffic in adjacent residential neighborhoods. The number of curb cuts on France Avenue will remain the same so there will be little change for pedestrians along France Avenue. Bicycle parking is recommended to be included on site. Having the access points only on France Avenue means that is how vehicles will access this development and no neighborhood cut through routes are being encouraged. Guiding Principle 7: Parking Parking should be hidden from view behind or beneath buildings on the west side of France Avenue. Eight of the 11 parking stalls for this development will be behind the buildings out of view of France Avenue. Guiding Principle 8: Streets and Sidewalks To create a gracious pedestrian environment, sidewalks should be widened as much as possible. Buildings should front onto the sidewalks, with few gaps and/or driveways breaking the street wall. Street trees and planters should be located between the curb and sidewalk. Furnishings should provide places to sit and dispose of trash and recycling. Vehicle traffic should be managed to maximize efficiency while maintaining safety for non-motorized users. Compared to the existing building on site, this building will be closer to France Avenue and have less parking between the sidewalk and the building. Development Concepts for Future Land Use These include: wider sidewalks along France Avenue, vegetation planted in the public right-of-way along France Avenue and Sunnyside Road, elimination of the free right- Traffic Impact Study 14 4532 France turn channel on the eastbound approach of Sunnyside Road to France Avenue, traffic calming (narrow width roadway) along Sunnyside Road west of France Avenue. A wider sidewalk is not planned, but less of the sidewalk will be adjacent to vehicle parking than at the current site. General guidelines for the entire neighborhood node These include: encouraging underground parking for residents, visually buffering surface parking lots, displaying consistent signage for automobiles and bicycle access, clearly defining pedestrian paths between parking lot and buildings, bicycle parking facilities close to front doors of businesses and on-site lighting for pedestrians. The majority of off-street parking at this development will be out of view from France Avenue, there will be pedestrian access from the sidewalk to the building and bicycle parking is to be included on site. On-site lighting should be included for safe pedestrian access. Transportation Trends & Challenges These include: skewed intersection layouts, high volumes on France Avenue, lack of parking for some businesses, lack of on-street bicycle facilities, lack of adequate transit facilities and uninviting pedestrian environment and narrow sidewalks. This development will provide parking for its businesses which will be able to accommodate the parking demand a majority of the time. Bicycle parking is to be included on site. The City is encouraged to increase the amount of bicycle and transit facilities. Traffic Impact Study 15 4532 France 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The traffic impacts of the proposed development were thoroughly studied, and the principal findings are: • The proposed 4532 France redevelopment is expected to generate 64 new trips during an average weekday, 4 new trips during the a.m. peak hour and 7 new trips during the p.m. peak hour. • All roadways and intersections are forecast to have acceptable queues and delays with the addition of traffic from this development. • Adequate vehicle parking will be provided on site for a majority of the time based on the parking analysis. The site may have more retail parking demand than capacity during Saturday peak hours, in which case overflow parking of approximately three vehicles can be handled on-street. The following recommendations are made based on the above findings: • Including bicycle parking on site. • Properly grade the curbs around the ADA loading space to allow full use of the ADA loading area by a wheelchair. • Move the trash to allow for curbside pickup on France Avenue. Traffic Impact Study 16 4532 France 7. Appendix A. Site Plan B. The Language of Traffic Engineering C. Traffic Counts D. Trip Generation Table E. Level of Service (LOS) F. Capacity Analysis Backup • AM Existing • PM Existing • 2020 AM Build • 2020 PM Build DATE: November 5, 2018 TO: 4532 France Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE – Director of Engineering Charlie Gerk, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 4532 France Ave – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Civil, Landscape, and Survey drawings dated 10/16/2018. And a revised Architectural Site Plan dated 11/1/2018. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. Vacate existing easements as needed with easement holders, including city of Edina. Grading/Building Permit 3. Provide public easements for relevant public utilities. Grading/Building Permit 4. Provide sidewalk easements along France Ave. If sidewalk is located on private property. Grading/Building Permit 5. Possible well on site, provide verification that existing well on site is sealed, if not sealed, seal well with licensed contractor. Grading/Building Permit Survey 6. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 6.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 7. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 8. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 9. Access is from France Avenue, which is owned and operated by Hennepin County. Requirements and permits should be verified with them. 10. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 11. Provide traffic study. Grading/Building Permit Sanitary and Water Utilities 12. Sanitary and water utilities located in France Avenue are owned and operated by the City of Minneapolis. 13. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. (If required) Grading/Building Permit 14. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 15. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 16. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with Minneapolis public works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 16.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Confirm with Minneapolis. Grading/Building Permit 17. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. Confirm with Minneapolis. Utility Permit 18. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Council. The SAC determination will be used by the city to calculate sewer and water connection charges. Grading/Building Permit 19. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection unless required based on building heights, watermain pressure or watermain flows. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 20. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 21. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 22. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 23. Site is tributary to a downstream landlocked basin (sub- watershed MHN_65) with structural flooding risk. No increase in the atlas 14, 1% annual chance for flood elevation. Grading/Building Permit 24. Match or reduce from the existing rate for the atlas 14 1% annual chance event, for flow heading north, west and south. Grading/Building Permit 25. Verify design constraints for any flow directed to France Avenue with the City of Minneapolis. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 26. An erosion and sediment control plan consistent with city code is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 27. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 28. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 29. Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Turning Performance Analysis 5/1/2013 45.00 ° Inside Cramp Angle: 81.92 in.Axle Track: 5.25 in.Wheel Offset: 16.60 in.Tread Width: 65.99 in.Chassis Overhang: 258.00 in.Wheelbase: 20 ft. 4 in.Inside Turn: 36 ft. 8 in.Curb to Curb: 41 ft. 1 in.Wall to Wall: Parameters: Calculated Turning Radii: Comments: Truck 12205 Additional Bumper Depth: 19.00 in. Axle Track Tread WidthChassis Overhang Wheelbase Inside Turning Radius Wheel Offset Cramp Angle Additional Bumper Depth Curb to Curb Turning Radius W all to W all Turning R adius 84.99 in.Front Overhang Components Front Tires Chassis Front Bumper Aerial Device Tires, Michelin, 425/65R22.50 20 ply XZY 3 tread Dash-2000, Chassis, PAP/SkyArm/Midmount Bumper, 19" extended, Imp/Vel xxxAerial, 100' Pierce Platform PRIDE #Description 0078244 0070220 0123625 0006900 Notes: Actual Inside Cramp Angle may be less due to highly specialized options. Curb to Curb turning radius calculated for a 9.00 inch curb. Page 1 of 2 Turning Performance Analysis 5/1/2013 Definitions: Inside Cramp Angle Maximum turning angle of the front inside tire. Axle Track King-pin to king-pin distance of the front axle. Wheel Offset Offset from the center-line of the wheel to the king-pin. Tread Width Width of the tire tread. Chassis Overhang Distance from the center-line of the front axle to the front edge of the cab. This does not include the bumper depth. Additional Bumper Depth Depth that the bumper assembly adds to the front overhang. Wheelbase Distance between the center lines of the vehicle's front and rear axles. Inside Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle around which the vehicle can turn. Curb to Curb Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the vehicle's tires can turn. This measurement assumes a curb height of 9 inches. Wall to Wall Turning Radius Radius of the smallest circle inside of which the entire vehicle can turn. This measurement takes into account any front overhang due to the chassis, bumper extensions and/or aerial devices. Page 2 of 2 Cary, would you please forward this onto the City Council and also include a copy of it in their preparation materials packet. Thank you very much. Casey To: Edina City Council Members Cc: City Planning Commissioner Cary Teague My name is Casey Carl. My wife Jamie and I are are writing you in advance of the December 4th City Council Meeting in which we will be requesting your support and approval of our proposed development plans for the 4532 France Ave property. We are long-terms residents in the Morningside neighborhood and are active community members in Morningside and the greater Edina area. We’ve lived and worked in the area for the last 12 years, fully participated in the 44th/France Small Area Plan (SAP) development, and collectively have over 40 years of retail and business experience. Jamie ran a very successful retail boutique at 50th and France, is a member of the Morningside Women’s Club, chaired the fundraiser for Highlands Elementary the last several years and has been an engaged and frequent fundraiser and volunteer in Edina Schools since our oldest son started 8 years ago. I am the former Chief Strategy and Innovation Officer at Target, with deep experience in merchandising, digital and technology. With over 20 years of retail experience, I founded and serve as CEO of North Coast Ventures, a retail consulting and early-stage venture capital firm. Although I spent significant time in Silicon Valley in the past decade, as a long-term resident of the Twin Cities I chose to locate my company locally because I personally want to see and contribute to greater development of the technology and startup ecosystem in order to fuel growth and job creation here in the Twin Cities. I advise numerous startups locally, serve as the Chairman of the Board of Directors for Matter (a local non-profit that serves communities locally and abroad by providing access to healthcare and nutritious meals), and have coached both soccer and basketball in Edina for several years. We originally purchased the 4532 France Ave property in 2017 with two other business partners, both of whom are local residents, with the hopes of developing a building that could help house and grow all three of our local businesses in the community. Our development plans for the property incurred many delays and pivots as we waited for the 44th/France Small Area Plan to take shape. Being residents of Morningside, my wife and I actively participated throughout the entire process of the SAP development and were excited to see a plan that modernized the area while still preserving the uniqueness and charm of the Morningside Community. As you may remember, our original proposal was met with enthusiasm by the City Council, stating this was “exactly the type of development we want” with local residents, retail and technology/creative offerings and an architectural design that was modernized yet consistent with the historic aesthetic of the neighborhood and surrounding businesses. The biggest opportunity highlighted in the feedback from the City Council centered around the limited parking available on such a small lot, knowing that the plans for centralized-parking proposed in the SAP were not determined and would not be for at least a couple of years. After receiving this feedback and knowing the resolution for centralized parking was some ways off, we decided to refine the scope and ambition of the development proposal for the 4532 France Ave property. Jamie and I purchased the building outright in the summer of 2018 and began plans for a more conservative proposal that still maintained all of the best elements of our original plan, even though it resulted in further delays due to conflicting feedback and incurring significant additional expenses. Our current proposal is for a 2 story building that is situated far closer to France Ave than the existing building in the spirit of the SAP, but balanced with the locations of the adjacent properties, both of which were recently developed/remodeled. We’ve maintained the exterior brick facade to tie into the historical aesthetic of the neighborhood. The sidewalk has been directly connected to the front of the building and we’ve maintained a few parking spots in the front to serve the convenient and impulsive nature of retail shoppers. We will be adding landscaping and greenery to the front of the property as well as the back of the property to give some greater protection to our neighbors on the west. The rooftop patio is preserved in our proposal but we are aligning the patio portion to face France Ave and are exploring an environmentally friendly green roof/landscaping for the west-facing 1/3 of the roof, which will benefit the neighbors and provide much better water collection. Lastly, in regards to parking we are now short parked only 3 stalls to the existing zoning requirements and will have more than enough parking available for customers and employees, even during peak retail hours (as demonstrated by findings of the traffic study). We have spoken to and have the support of numerous Morningside residents (including Gateway Bank, our immediate neighbors to the north) that are very supportive of our development plan and are excited about what it will add to the neighborhood. However, we do understand that there are a couple of residents that have voiced concerns about our proposed development and we’re taking measures to meet with them and better understand their concerns. We firmly believe our proposal will be a positive addition to the neighborhood and business community and have done everything in our power to develop a plan in accordance with the SAP and prior feedback from the Planning Commission and City Council. Thank you, Casey and Jamie Carl To Whom it May Concern: I am a resident of the Morningside neighborhood of Edina and I am writing to you to express my support of the building plans to improve the property at 4532 France Ave. S. As a longtime resident of Morningside, I have watched the neighborhood transform over the past 13 years. New homes have been added, old homes have been remodeled and updated and families continue to seek out the Morningside neighborhood as a place to settle and raise their children. As independently owned businesses have been added to our neighborhood (Hello Pizza) and long standing independently owned businesses have continued to be supported by our neighborhood (Dick’s Barber Shop, GEAR running store, Convention Grill), I have been proud to see how my neighbors and community have continued to “show up” with steadfast loyalty in supporting these businesses. I have known Casey and Jamie Carl as friends and neighbors since moving into this neighborhood. They are residents of Morningside, creative entrepreneurs and small business owners with remarkable resumes that support a history of successful careers in both retail and business development. Casey and Jamie are looking to take their skills, talents and passions and reinvest these resources into our community. I have had the pleasure of knowing the Carl family on a personal level, I have watched how Casey and Jamie have consistently contributed to and supported our community. Whether it be through their volunteer work, their support of local charities or their commitment (both through giving of their time and monetary donations) to our children’s schools. I strongly support the idea of supporting these neighbors, friends and small business owners in their pursuit to reinvest in the property along France Avenue. Thank you for your consideration, Heather Bracken 4220 Lynn Ave Morningside Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2018 9:30 AM To: Cary Teague <cteague@EdinaMN.gov>; Kris Aaker <KAaker@EdinaMN.gov> Subject: 4532 France Avenue Dear Mr. Teague and Ms. Aaker, My name is Amy Strodl and I am a resident of Morningside. I wanted to take a moment to reach out on behalf of my neighbors and friends, Jamie and Casey Carl. I would like to be on the record in support of their new small business and building located at 4532 France Avenue. My husband and I are both in the design field. He is an architect and I am an interior designer (not on their project). Aesthetically, we find that the new design of this property to be both beautiful and thoughtful. Being in the design field, we really appreciate the great effort and cost that is required to produce thoughtful architecture. We believe this new design will elevate this particular site and the block as a whole. As residents we would consider ourselves lucky to both drive by and shop in such a great space! In our opinion, it would be a vast improvement to the current state of the property. Personally, I’d also like to speak to the character of the Carls. They are long time residents who care deeply about our community. This is not just lip service. They actively volunteer, support and love on our schools and city. These are exactly the type of people that we want building businesses in our neighborhood! While I have no problem with big business, I certainly would prefer that it is our local, small businesses that be championed and supported by our government. They live only a few streets away so to say that they are accountable is an understatement. Not only are they brilliant in their fields but they are both extremely socially conscious. In closing, I’d like to ask that this letter be included in any material shared with the City Council. I’d love for them to know that the Carls have many friends and supporters in this new endeavor. Let’s not lose them and their business to the city of Minneapolis, it would be our loss. We look forward to a thoughtful and supportive review of this project! Very Best Regards, Amy E. Strodl, NCIDQ Principal The CITY of EDINA Rezoning, Site Plan with Variances – 4532 France Avenue The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 3 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 4 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 7 Proposal The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 8 Sketch Plan The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 9 Sketch Plan Sketch Plan The CITY of EDINARevisions from Sketch Plan: EdinaMN.gov 10 Reduced the size of the building from 10,000 square feet to 2,375 square feet. This was in response to the extreme shortage of parking at sketch plan. One site entrance to respond to Hennepin County access concerns. Added green space, landscaping and a pedestrian connection from the sidewalk along France Avenue. This area would match and expand the green space to the north. The CITY of EDINARequest Requires: www.EdinaMN.gov 11 1. A Rezoning from R-1, Low Density Residential to PCD-1, Planned Commercial District. 2. Site Plan with the following Variances: Building Front Yard Setback from 35 feet to 31 feet. Side Yard Setback from 30 feet to 23 feet. Building Height from Two Stories and 24 feet to Two Stories and 30-38 feet. Parking Lot Front Yard Setback from 20 feet to 0 feet (existing condition) Side from 10 feet to 0 feet (existing condition) Rear Yard Setback from 10 feet to 4 feet. Parking Stall Variance from 15 to 11. The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 12 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 13 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 14 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 16 The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issues Is the proposed rezoning and development plan with variances reasonable for this site? EdinaMN.gov 17 The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issues Is the proposed rezoning and development plan with variances reasonable for this site? EdinaMN.gov 18 1. The proposed uses would fit in to the neighborhood. As mentioned, this site is guided in the NN, Neighborhood Node in the Comprehensive Plan, which allows for small scale retail and office uses. Rezoning the site to PCD-1, Limited Commercial is consistent with the adjacent zoning district to the north. 2. The building is relatively small and in scale with the existing building to the north. The design of the new structure is intended to blend into the neighborhood. 3. The existing roadways and proposed parking would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a parking and traffic impact study based on the proposed development, and concluded that no roadway improvements or parking improvements would be necessary as a result of the proposed plan. Adequate parking is available in the area. Additionally, the owners live a few blocks from the building and intend to walk to work. The retail business does not anticipate that Saturday would be the busiest day, as was the conclusion in the parking study. The CITY of EDINAPrimary Issues Is the proposed rezoning and development plan with variances reasonable for this site? EdinaMN.gov 19 1. Although the site is very small, the applicant has addressed the guiding principles. The proposal would remove a single-family home that is not consistent with the small area plan and replace it with a retail/office building that is similar to the new Gateway Bank development on the adjacent property to the north. The overhead utility lines will be buried as part of the 4500 France development. The project would provide a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere along the adjacent roadway, with a better connection to the building. Landscaping would be expanded to increase greenspace along France Avenue. Bike racks and a seating area would be provided in front. Storefronts open toward France. The parking arrangement and green space in front would be similar to the adjacent Gateway Bank project to the north. 2. The proposal meets the Variance criteria as highlighted on pages 7-8 within this report. The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 20 The CITY of EDINARecommendation www.EdinaMN.gov 21 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 22 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 23 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 24 City Standard (PCD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – France Avenue Rear Side – North Side – South Parking Lot Setbacks Front – France Avenue Side – North Side – South Rear – West 35 feet 25 feet NA 30 feet 20 feet 5 feet 5 feet 20 feet 31 feet* 65 feet NA 23 feet* 0 feet* (existing condition) 0 feet* (existing condition) 0 feet* (existing condition) 4 feet* Building Height 2-stories & 24 feet 2 stories & 30 feet* 39 feet to the top of the elevator Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0 .26 Parking 15 stalls 11 stalls* The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 25 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 26 The CITY of EDINA www.EdinaMN.gov 27 Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.D. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Kyle Sawyer, Assistant Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: 2019 Building & Liquor License Fees, Ordinance No. 2018-17: Amending Chapters 2 and 28 of the City Code, Setting Fees for 2019 Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Hold a public hearing on the proposed Building and Liquor License fees and charges. Motion to adopt Ordinance 2018-17 Amending Chapters 2 and 28 of the City Code, Setting Fees for 2019. INTRODUCTION: Attached is amended City Code and a schedule of fees and charges to be adopted by Ordinance 2018-17, proposed for 2019. Amended language is being proposed to Chapter 28 of the City Code to help reduce development costs for affordable housing projects by granting a reduction in the service availability charge and/or water and sewer connection charges if outlined conditions are met. The fees that are proposed to change from 2018 to 2019 are in bold. In summary, most fee changes are in the following chapters of the City Code: Chapter 10 - Buildings and Building Regulations Fees are proposed to increase about 2%. Edina permit fees are consistent with comparable cities. Chapter 18 - Fire Prevention Fees are proposed to increase about 2.5%. Edina permit fees are consistent with comparable cities. Chapter 28 - Utilities At the November 20, 2018 work session, City staff and Ehlers & Associates presented and discussed with the City Council an update to the 2015 Utility Rate Study. As a part of the update, utility fees are proposed to increase 5% for water and sanitary sewer charges and 15% for storm sewer charges. The increase to water and sanitary sewer charges does not represent a significant change from previous annual increases. The storm sewer charge is being increased 15% compared to the 2015's rate study projection of 6.5% to offset increased proposed capital spending to the storm water system. In 2019, City staff will be studying alternative storm water funding options to be presented to the City Council. Rates in the Morningside district will be set once we receive the 2019 water rates from the City of Minneapolis. ATTACHMENTS: Description Ordinance No. 2018-17 Amending Chapters 2 and 28 of the City Code ORDINANCE NO. 2018-17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 2 AND 28 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 28-142 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 28-142. – Units determined. (a) Except as provided by section 28-146, a connection charge shall be made for each residential equivalent connection (REC) made, or required to be made, to the city water system or city sewer system. The number of sewer availability charge (SAC) units determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services will be used to determine the number of REC units for various public, commercial, industrial, institutional, residential and multifamily residential facilities. (b) If, after the initial connection charges are paid, additional building permits or new sewer connections are made, or when an increase of wastewater flow into the municipal sanitary sewer system is determined by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, charges shall be recalculated and any additional charges shall be paid. In determining the amount of the charge, the council may consider all costs of the construction, reconstruction, establishment, operation, maintenance, repair, depreciation and replacement of the city water system or sewer system, and of improvements, enlargements and extensions necessary to serve the city adequately, including the principal and interest to become due on obligations issued or to be issued therefor. (c) The SAC may be reduced if the applicant provides the City with proof of prior written approval or reduction from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. Section 2. Section 28-143 of the Edina City Code is amended to read as follows: Sec. 28-143. – Amount of connection charge. The connection charge for connection to the city water system and the connection charge for connection to the city sewer system shall be set forth in section 2-724. The connection charges may be reduced as follows: (a) Apartments with a minimum of four units may receive a 20% discount in charges if there is no plumbing for laundry facilities in any of the units (generally evidenced by a common laundry facility and no laundry hook-ups in the units). (b) Multi-dwelling, publicly-assisted housing units with a minimum of four units may receive a 25% discount in charges if there is no plumbing for garbage disposals or for dishwashers in any of the units and the housing consists entirely of publicly-subsidized, low-income units. Section 3. Only the following described fees of Schedule A to City Code Chapter 2, Section 2-724 are amended to read as follows: Chapter and Section Purpose of Fee/Charge 2018 Fee Proposed 2019 Fee Chapter 2 2-220 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,000.00 Chapter 4 4-4 Liquor license fees (per year) $9,225.00 On-sale intoxicating license, restaurants only $9,455.00 On-sale intoxicating license, restaurants only Ordinance No. 2018-17 Page 2 $720.00 3.2 beer license off- or on-sale $738.00 3.2 beer license off- or on-sale $1,330.00 Brew pub license $1,363.00 Brew pub license $1,330.00 Cocktail room license $1,363.00 Cocktail room license $1,330.00 Brewer taproom license $1,363.00 Brewer taproom license $225.00 Per event, temporary on-sale intoxicating, max. three days by state statute $230.00 Per event, temporary on-sale intoxicating, max. three days by state statute $120.00 Per event, temporary on-sale 3.2 malt liquor $125.00 Per event, temporary on-sale 3.2 malt liquor Chapter 10 10-19 Landscaping, screening or erosion control site plan permit $112.45 $115.00 10-74 Building Permit If total valuation of work is: $1.00 to $500.00 $33.66 Then amount is: * $34.35 Then amount is: * $501.00 to $2,000.00 $33.66 *For first $500.00, plus $34.35 *For first $500.00, plus $3.77 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $3.85 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $90.21 *For first $2,000.00, plus $92.10 *For first $2,000.00, plus $17.44 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $17.80 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $491.33 *For first $25,000.00, plus $501.50 *For first $25,000.00, plus $12.37 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $12.60 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $800.58 *For first $50,000.00, plus $816.50 *For first $50,000.00, plus $9.00 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $9.20 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,250.58 *For first $100,000.00, plus $1,276.50 *For first $100,000.00, plus $6.75 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $6.90 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,950.58 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $4,036.50 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $5.91 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $6.00 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $6,905.58 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $7,036.50 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $4.50 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof $4.60 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Fee $100.00 For every 30-days the temporary certificate of occupancy is open except October 15th through June 1st $105.00 For every 30-days the temporary certificate of occupancy is open except October 15th through June 1st 10-75 Other permit-related fees $112.45 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $115.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 10-108 Demolition permit for single- and two-family dwelling units $1,688.00 $1,720.00 10-306 Permit for moving of building $240.00 $245.00 10- 306(a)(3) Indemnity deposit for damages sustained by moving of building $600.00 Unless licensed by commissioner of transportation $610.00 Unless licensed by commissioner of transportation Ordinance No. 2018-17 Page 3 10-368 Installer's licenses; oil burner: Stoker; steam or hot water heating; mechanical warm air heating and air conditioning; refrigeration; and gas piping installers $66.00 $67.30 10-403 Gas piping permit; oil burner: Stoker, steam or hot water heating, mechanical warm air heating and air conditioning; refrigeration $32.10 Minimum Fee: Residential—Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. §16B.70 $32.75 Minimum Fee: Residential—Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. §16B.70 $32.10 Commercial—Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats.§16B.70 $32.75 Commercial—Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats.§16B.70 $32.10 Fee Calculations: *Plus 3.10% >$500.00 $32.75 Fee Calculations: *Plus 3.10% >$500.00 $0.00 to $1,000.00 $1,001.00 to $5,000.00 $38.60 *Plus 2.60% > $1,000.00 $39.40 *Plus 2.60% > $1,000.00 $5,001.00 to $10,000.00 $165.45 *Plus 2.15% > $5,000.00 $168.75 *Plus 2.15% > $5,000.00 $10,001.00 to $25,000.00 $292.30 *Plus 1.85% > $10,000.00 $298.15 *Plus 1.85% > $10,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $634.25 *Plus 1.65% > $25,000.00 $647.00 *Plus 1.65% > $25,000.00 $50,001.00 and over $1,103.10 *Plus 1.30% > $50,000.00 $1,125.20 *Plus 1.30% > $50,000.00 *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 10-403(1) Other permit-related fees $110.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $115.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 10-429 Plumbing or water conditioning permit $32.10 Minimum Fee: Residential, plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 $32.75 Minimum Fee: Residential, plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 $32.10 Commercial, plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 $32.75 Commercial, plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 $0.00 to $300.00 $32.10 Fee Calculations: $32.75 Fee Calculations: $301.00 to $700.00 $32.10 *Plus 3.10% > $300.00 $32.75 *Plus 3.10% > $300.00 $701.00 to $1,000.00 $33.66 *Plus 2.60% > $700.00 $34.35 *Plus 2.60% > $700.00 $1,001.00 to $5,000.00 $38.60 *Plus 2.15% > $1,000.00 $39.40 *Plus 2.15% > $1,000.00 $5,001.00 to $10,000.00 $165.45 *Plus 1.85% > $5,000.00 $168.75 *Plus 1.85% > $5,000.00 $10,001.00 to $25,000.00 $292.30 *Plus 1.75% > $10,000.00 $298.15 *Plus 1.75% > $10,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $634.25 *Plus 1.65% > $25,000.00 $647.00 *Plus 1.65% > $25,000.00 $50,001.00 and over $1,103.10 *Plus 1.30% > $50,000.00 $1,125.20 *Plus 1.30% > $50,000.00 *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 *Plus surcharge pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 16B.70 Installation or testing of RPZ backflow preventers $32.10 $32.75 10-429(1) Other permit-related fees $112.45 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $115.00 Per hour or the total hourly cost to city, whichever is greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 10-513(d) Public swimming pool license $530.00 Per year for each enclosed pool (partial or all of the year) $545.00 Per year for each enclosed pool (partial or all of the year) $385.00 Per year for each outdoor pool $395.00 Per year for each outdoor pool Public whirlpool bath or therapeutic swimming pool license $190.00 Per year for each bath or pool $195.00 Per year for each bath or pool Ordinance No. 2018-17 Page 4 Chapter 12 12-104 Refuse or recycling hauler's license $320.00 Per year for first vehicle $330.00 Per year for first vehicle 12-218 Tobacco sale license $400.00 Per location $415.00 Per location 12-343 Registration for massage therapists $30.00 Per therapist for those businesses exempt from licensure $35.00 Per therapist for those businesses exempt from licensure 12-346(a) Physical culture and health service or club, reducing club or salon, sauna parlor, massage parlor or escort service $320.00 Business license $330.00 Business license Chapter 16 16-129 Loudspeaker permit $25.00 $30.00 Chapter 18 18-64 Emergency Responder Radio Coverage Fee $82.00 18-67(a) Operational permits required by MSFC § 105.6. $80.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $82.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) Nonbusiness hours inspection $128.50 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee $132.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee Construction permits required by MSFC § 105.7, except for those covered in this Code in chapter 18, article III, division 5, if total valuation of work is: $1.00 to $500.00 $34.32 *Minimum fee $35.18 *Minimum fee $501.00 to $2,000.00 $34.32 *For first $500.00, plus $35.18 *For first $500.00, plus $3.85 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $3.95 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $92.04 *For first $2,000.00, plus $94.34 *For first $2,000.00, plus $17.78 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $18.22 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $501.07 *For first $25,000.00, plus $513.60 *For first $25,000.00, plus $12.62 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $12.94 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $816.14 *For first $50,000.00, plus $836.54 *For first $50,000.00, plus $9.17 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $9.40 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,274.78 *For first $100,000.00, plus $1,306.65 *For first $100,000.00, plus $6.88 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $7.05 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,028.70 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $4,129.42 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $6.02 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $6.17 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $7,039.50 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $7,215.49 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $4.59 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof $4.70 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Pre Pay Electronic Application Fee 0.50% Application fee .50% of the value of the project Application fee .50% of the value of the project Plan check 65% of permit fee for systems with valuation over $1,000.00 65% of permit fee Ordinance No. 2018-17 Page 5 18-67(b) Code compliance inspection $80.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $82.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) Day care inspection $50.00 Per inspection per Minn. Stats. § 245A.151 $50.00 Per inspection per Minn. Stats. § 245A.151 18-131 License to service fire extinguishers $118.00 Per year per person licensed $121.00 Per year per person licensed 18-168 Permit fee for cleaning kitchen exhaust hood and duct systems $101.00 $100.00 18-195(a) Sprinkler permit, if total valuation of work is: $1.00 to $500.00 $34.32 *Minimum fee $35.18 *Minimum fee $501.00 to $2,000.00 $34.32 *For first $500.00, plus $35.18 *For first $500.00, plus $3.85 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $3.95 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $92.04 *For first $2,000.00, plus $94.34 *For first $2,000.00, plus $17.78 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $18.22 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $501.07 *For first $25,000.00, plus $513.60 *For first $25,000.00, plus $12.62 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $12.94 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $816.14 *For first $50,000.00, plus $836.54 *For first $50,000.00, plus $9.17 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $9.40 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,274.78 *For first $100,000.00, plus $1,306.65 *For first $100,000.00, plus $6.88 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $7.05 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,028.70 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $4,129.42 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $6.02 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000,000.00 $6.17 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $7,039.50 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $7,215.49 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $4.59 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof $4.70 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Hydrant Flow Test Fee $124.00 Plan check 65% of permit fee for systems with valuation over $1,000.00 65% of permit fee Fire alarm and alternative fire suppression permit, if total valuation of work is: $1.00 to $500.00 $34.32 *Minimum fee $35.18 *Minimum fee $501.00 to $2,000.00 $34.32 *For first $500.00, plus $35.18 *For first $500.00, plus $3.85 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $3.95 For each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $92.04 *For first $2,000.00, plus $94.34 *For first $2,000.00, plus $17.78 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $18.22 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $501.07 *For first $25,000.00, plus $513.60 *For first $25,000.00, plus $12.62 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $12.94 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $816.14 *For first $50,000.00, plus $836.54 *For first $50,000.00, plus Ordinance No. 2018-17 Page 6 $9.17 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $9.40 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,274.78 *For first $100,000.00, plus $1,306.65 *For first $100,000.00, plus $6.88 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $7.05 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $4,028.70 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $4,129.42 *For the first $500,000.00, plus $6.02 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000,000.00 $6.17 For each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $7,039.50 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $7,215.49 *For the first $1,000,000.00, plus $4.59 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof $4.70 For each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof Plan check 65% of permit fee for systems with a valuation over $1,000.00 65% of permit fee 18-195(b) Other permit-related fees $80.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) $82.00 Per hour with a minimum one hour fee (includes supervision, code review, inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 18-217 False alarm fees $321.00 Residential $329.00 Residential $535.50 Commercial $549.00 Commercial 18-244 License allowing sale of fireworks $117.00 Per year $119.00 Per year Chapter 20 20-218 Recycling service $6.60 Per quarter, single family $8.10 Per quarter, single family $6.60 Per quarter, double bungalow $8.10 Per quarter, double bungalow $6.60 Per quarter, apartments/condos (2—8 units) $8.10 Per quarter, apartments/condos (2—8 units) 20-277 Food establishment $650.00 High risk food $660.00 High risk food $400.00 Medium risk food $410.00 Medium risk food $120.00 Low risk food $125.00 Low risk food $165.00 Base fee $170.00 Base fee $160.00 Seasonal temporary food stand $165.00 Seasonal temporary food stand $160.00 Seasonal permanent food stand $165.00 Seasonal permanent food stand $215.00 Mobile food unit $220.00 Mobile food unit $150.00 Food vehicle $165.00 Food vehicle $160.00 Additional facility $165.00 Additional facility 20-476 Body art establishment license $310.00 $330.00 Body art establishment plan review fee $310.00 $330.00 Chapter 28 28-43(b) Sewer Service: Based upon water usage during winter quarter (November 1 to March 1) Based upon water usage during winter quarter (November 1 to March 1) 1. Single-family, townhouses, two-family dwellings, apartment buildings containing four or less dwelling units $62.16 Per quarter to and including 12,000 gallons $65.27 Per quarter to and including 12,000 gallons $5.18 Per 1,000 gallons used, whichever is greater $5.44 Per 1,000 gallons used, whichever is greater 2. Apartment building with more than four dwelling units $55.98 Per quarter for each unit over four; or $58.78 Per quarter for each unit over four; or $5.18 Per 1,000 gallons used, whichever is greater $5.44 Per 1,000 gallons used, whichever is greater Ordinance No. 2018-17 Page 7 3. Commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and churches $62.16 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises; or $65.27 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises; or $5.18 Per 1,000 gallons of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater $5.44 Per 1,000 gallons of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Water Service: 1. Per 1,000 gallons for areas of city, except in the Morningside area $2.23 Up to 26,000 gallons $2.34 Up to 26,000 gallons $2.96 26,001 to 49,000 gallons $3.11 26,001 to 49,000 gallons $4.63 Over 49,000 gallons $4.86 Over 49,000 gallons 2. Domestic accounts used by commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and churches $2.23 Up to 26,000 gallons $2.34 Up to 26,000 gallons $2.96 Over 26,000 gallons $3.11 Over 26,000 gallons 3. Lawn watering accounts used by commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and churches $2.96 Up to 26,000 gallons $3.11 Up to 26,000 gallons $4.63 Over 26,000 gallons $4.86 Over 26,000 gallons 4. Meter charge $20.33 Per quarter for up to 3/4-inch meter $21.35 Per quarter for up to 3/4-inch meter $27.73 Per quarter for 1-inch meter $29.12 Per quarter for 1-inch meter $31.63 Per quarter for 11/4-inch meter $33.21 Per quarter for 11/4-inch meter $35.57 Per quarter for 11/2-inch meter $37.35 Per quarter for 11/2-inch meter $57.29 Per quarter for 2-inch meter $60.15 Per quarter for 2-inch meter $217.53 Per quarter for 3-inch meter $228.41 Per quarter for 3-inch meter $276.89 Per quarter for 4-inch meter $290.73 Per quarter for 4-inch meter $350.89 Per quarter for 6-inch meter $368.43 Per quarter for 6-inch meter $445.62 Per quarter for 8-inch meter $467.90 Per quarter for 8-inch meter 28-142 Service availability charge (SAC) $2,485.00 Per SAC unit × number of SAC units computed pursuant to section 28-112 $2,485.00 Per SAC unit × number of SAC units computed pursuant to section 28-112 $1,988.00 Per SAC unit × number of SAC units computed pursuant to section 28-112, 20% reduction with MCES approval $1,863.75 Per SAC unit × number of SAC units computed pursuant to section 28-112, 25% reduction with MCES approval 28-143 Charge for connection to city water or sewer system $2,289.80 Water connection charge per REC unit × number of SAC units $2,450.00 Water connection charge per REC unit × number of SAC units $1,960.00 Water connection charge per REC unit × number of SAC units with 20% reduction with City approval $1,837.50 Water connection charge per REC unit × number of SAC units with 25% reduction with City approval $1,144.90 Sewer connection charge per REC unit × number of SAC units $1,500.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit × number of SAC units $1,200.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit × number of SAC units with 20% reduction with City approval $1,125.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit × number of SAC units with 25% reduction with City approval Ordinance No. 2018-17 Page 8 28-208 28-209 Stormwater drainage charge $30.27 Per quarter pursuant to formula in section 28-208 $34.81 Per quarter pursuant to formula in section 28-208 Chapter 32 32-69 Plat and subdivision filing fee $200.00 Per lot for division of one or more lots where no new buildable $250.00 Per lot for division of one or more lots where no new buildable Chapter 36 36-95 Variance fee $450.00 Residential $500.00 Residential $700.00 Commercial $750.00 Commercial 36-193 Fee for transfer of land to another zoning district $600.00 1. R-2 lot $650.00 1. R-2 lot $600.00 2. R-2 lots $650.00 2. R-2 lots $1,200.00 All other transfers $1,750.00 All other transfers 36-301 Conditional use permit $900.00 Fee shall be equal to city staff time expended and city's direct $1,000.00 Fee shall be equal to city staff time expended and city's direct 36-339 Final development plan application fee $950.00 $1,000.00 36-644 Temporary retail sales in PID permit $400.00 First permit $450.00 First permit $300.00 Subsequent permits $350.00 Subsequent permits Section 4. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2019. First Reading: December 4, 2018 Second Reading: December 18, 2018 Published: December 27, 2018 Attest Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN CURRENT, THURSDAY, December 27, 2018 SEND TWO AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION BILL TO EDINA CITY CLERK Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: VI.E. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Don Uram, Finance Director Item Activity: Subject:PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution No. 2018-125: Setting 2019 Tax Levy and Adopting Operating Budget, and Review 2019 Budget Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Hold a public hearing on the 2019 Operating Budget and Tax Levy. Following the hearing, the Council has two actions to consider: Motion to approve Resolution No. 2018-125 Setting the 2019 Tax Levy and Adopting 2019 Operating Budget. Motion to approve the 2019-2023 Capital Improvement P lan. INTRODUCTION: The City started the 2018-2019 Budget development process early in 2017. On December 15, 2017, Council adopted the 2018-2019 Budget. The rationale behind a two-year budget is to spend more time in the second year on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and less time making changes to the operating budget. The City has followed this plan during 2018, making only a few changes to the 2019 budget while reviewing all details of the CIP. The City Council reviewed the proposed 2019 budget and 2019-2023 CIP at an August work session. On September 20, staff recommended a preliminary levy for taxes payable in 2019 based on the previously adopted two-year budget which would increase the total of all levies by $1,646,244 or 4.6%. Staff recommends the preliminary levy be approved as final as shown in attached resolution. If no budget resolution is passed on December 4, then the Council and HRA are required by statute to act at the next meeting on December 18, 2018. Approval of the CIP doesn't have the same statutory deadline, but staff recommends approval of both at this same time. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 2018-125 Levy & Operating Budget Attachment A - 2019 Governmental Funds Budget Attachment B - 2019 Enterprise Funds Budget 2019 Proposed Tax Levy and Budgets 2019 - 2023 Capital Improvement Plan Staff Presentation RESOLUTION NO. 2018-125 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR YEAR 2019, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2019 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Budgets for all Governmental Funds as shown on Attachment A for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2019 is hereby adopted and funds are hereby appropriated; Section 2. The Budgets for all Enterprise Funds as shown on Attachment B for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2019 is hereby adopted and funds are hereby appropriated; Section 3. That there will be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts as follows: FOR GENERAL FUND $30,009,121 FOR CONSTRUCTION FUND $2,630,000 FOR ARTS AND CULTURE FUND $20,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS – SERIES 2016A (Fire) $406,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS – SERIES 2010A (City Hall) $952,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS – SERIES 2017C (PW) $1,050,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS – SERIES 2013A (PW) $448,600 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS – SERIES 2009A (PW) $196,400 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS – SERIES 2014 (Dome) $1,168,900 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS – SERIES 2015A (Gym) $390,000 TOTAL TAX CAPACITY LEVY $37,271,021 Approved this 4th day of December 2018. Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______ day of __________, 2018. _______________________________ City Clerk Attachment A CITY OF EDINA Governmental Fund Budgets Braemar Arts &Debt General HRA PACS CAS CDBG Police SR Memorial Culture Service Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 30,009,121$ 160,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 4,611,900$ 2,630,000$ 37,431,021$ Tax increments - 5,315,000 - - - - - - - - 5,315,000 Franchise fees & other taxes 892,500 - 1,200,000 1,200,000 - - - - - 105,000 3,397,500 Special assessments - - - - - - - - - 3,956,273 3,956,273 Licenses and permits 4,714,430 - - - - - - - - 75,000 4,789,430 Intergovernmental 1,253,977 - - - 125,000 - - - - 175,000 1,553,977 Charges for services 4,521,523 - - - - - - - - 200,000 4,721,523 Fines and forfeitures 900,000 - - - - - - - - - 900,000 Investment income 120,000 120,500 - - - 4 200 75 6,000 155,000 401,779 Other revenue 433,650 - - - - 167,061 5,000 5,150 - - 610,861 Transfers 50,000 - - - - - - - 3,298,163 200,000 3,548,163 Debt issued - - - - - - - - - 2,648,269 2,648,269 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 42,895,201 5,595,500 1,200,000 1,200,000 125,000 167,065 5,200 25,225 7,916,063 10,144,542 69,273,796 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 2,026,407 7,330,725 - 1,188,970 - - - - - 22,500 10,568,602 Communication & tech.1,288,764 - - - - - - - - 807,960 2,096,724 Human resources 888,694 - - - - - - - - - 888,694 Finance 1,099,125 - - - - - - - - - 1,099,125 Public works 6,595,064 - - - - - - - - 1,405,613 8,000,677 Engineering 1,849,492 - 1,245,362 - - - - - - 3,733,025 6,827,879 Police 12,728,656 - - - - 133,000 - - - 221,000 13,082,656 Fire 9,035,218 - - - - - - - - 145,000 9,180,218 Parks & recreation 5,541,785 - - - - - 40,000 15,850 - 279,000 5,876,635 Community development 1,841,996 - - - 125,000 - - - - - 1,966,996 Debt service - - - - - - - - 7,684,860 - 7,684,860 Transfers - - - - - - - - - 3,298,163 3,298,163 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 42,895,201 7,330,725 1,245,362 1,188,970 125,000 133,000 40,000 15,850 7,684,860 9,912,261 70,571,229 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services 29,966,880 168,305 133,679 131,033 - - - - - 110,917 30,510,814 Contractual services 6,135,622 585,520 20,000 252,525 125,000 78,000 - 15,250 - 130,383 7,342,300 Commodities 2,439,999 900 15,000 400,000 - 7,500 - 600 - 33,377 2,897,376 Central services 4,352,700 - 5,796 5,412 - - - - - 1,836 4,365,744 Equipment - - - - - 47,500 - - - 2,270,600 2,318,100 Capital outlay - 6,576,000 1,070,887 400,000 - - 40,000 - - 4,066,985 12,153,872 Debt service - - - - - - - - 7,684,860 - 7,684,860 Transfers - - - - - - - - - 3,298,163 3,298,163 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 42,895,201 7,330,725 1,245,362 1,188,970 125,000 133,000 40,000 15,850 7,684,860 9,912,261 70,571,229 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE -$ (1,735,225)$ (45,362)$ 11,030$ -$ 34,065$ (34,800)$ 9,375$ 231,203$ 232,281$ (1,297,433)$ 2019 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS 11/26/2018 Attachment B CITY OF EDINA Enterprise Fund Budgets 2018 Aquatic Golf Sports Art Risk Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Dome Center Edinborough Centennial Management Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN Operating revenues 22,790,121$ 13,973,293$ 1,039,650$ 3,508,828$ 2,347,100$ 409,000$ 516,350$ 1,393,750$ 814,000$ 902,952$ 47,695,044$ 43,869,840$ Intergovernmental 110,000 - - - - - - - - - 110,000 210,000 Investment income 90,000 - 22,000 16,000 1,000 8,000 2,000 18,000 6,000 - 163,000 153,000 Other revenue 2,000 32,000 - - - - 9,000 - - - 43,000 36,000 Transfers - - - - 300,000 - 200,000 - 200,000 - 700,000 650,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN 22,992,121 14,005,293 1,061,650 3,524,828 2,648,100 417,000 727,350 1,411,750 1,020,000 902,952 48,711,044 44,918,840 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY DEPARTMENT Administration - 12,666,162 - - - - - - - - 12,666,162 12,338,353 Human resources - - - - - - - - - 860,000 860,000 860,000 Finance 384,409 - - - - - - - - - 384,409 369,889 Public works 17,323,876 - - - - - - - - - 17,323,876 16,550,953 Engineering 347,418 - - - - - - - - - 347,418 342,231 Police 538,182 - - - - - - - - - 538,182 522,542 Parks and recreation - - 1,082,477 3,871,292 3,036,046 887,431 715,142 1,722,953 1,147,964 - 12,463,305 11,000,856 Transfers 100,000 850,000 - - - - - - - - 950,000 900,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 18,693,885 13,516,162 1,082,477 3,871,292 3,036,046 887,431 715,142 1,722,953 1,147,964 860,000 45,533,352 42,884,824 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS - 10,100,558 43,000 213,999 127,750 - 500 80,000 13,000 - 10,578,807 10,178,080 Personal services 2,606,912 1,571,457 390,214 1,527,038 1,096,083 167,983 495,225 843,093 694,952 115,000 9,507,957 8,398,077 Contractual services 8,171,626 532,863 176,200 451,600 813,100 163,750 105,925 357,300 190,600 745,000 11,707,964 11,314,136 Commodities 1,084,750 76,812 105,600 249,950 127,500 22,250 66,500 178,950 134,800 - 2,047,112 1,874,535 Central services 788,400 282,972 33,588 144,024 95,484 17,448 40,992 75,360 69,612 - 1,547,880 1,542,132 Depreciation 5,415,000 101,500 316,500 1,020,000 660,000 516,000 6,000 188,250 45,000 - 8,268,250 7,646,250 Interest 527,197 - 17,375 264,681 116,129 - - - - - 925,382 1,031,614 Transfers 100,000 850,000 - - - - - - - - 950,000 900,000 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT 18,693,885 13,516,162 1,082,477 3,871,292 3,036,046 887,431 715,142 1,722,953 1,147,964 860,000 45,533,352 42,884,824 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 4,298,236$ 489,131$ (20,827)$ (346,464)$ (387,946)$ (470,431)$ 12,208$ (311,203)$ (127,964)$ 42,952$ 3,177,692$ 2,034,016$ 2019 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS 11/26/2018 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Tax Levies Budget Budget 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 General Fund Levies General Operating Levy 22,933,958$ 25,023,952$ 26,860,319$ 28,493,077$ 30,009,121$ General Fund Subtotal 22,933,958 25,023,952 26,860,319 28,493,077 30,009,121 Increase From Prior Year (%)1.89%9.11%7.34%6.08%5.32% Arts and Culture Fund Levies Arts and Culture 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Arts and Culture Fund Subtotal 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Increase From Prior Year (%)0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00% Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service 944,400 946,000 946,000 950,000 952,000 Gymnasium Debt Service 409,440 385,901 388,000 389,000 390,000 Fire Station Debt Service 441,940 443,000 403,000 405,000 406,000 Public Works Facility Debt Service 1,546,600 1,561,000 1,696,000 1,667,000 1,695,000 Park Bond Market Value Levy 618,600 571,650 - - - Sports Dome 1,168,000 1,167,620 1,162,500 1,168,700 1,168,900 Debt Service Fund Subtotal 5,128,980 5,075,171 4,595,500 4,579,700 4,611,900 Increase From Prior Year (%)29.74%-1.05%-9.45%-0.34%0.70% Construction Fund Levies Capital Improvement Plan Levy - - 101,550 327,000 300,000 Equipment Levy 1,617,072 1,680,000 1,750,000 1,840,000 1,930,000 Weber Woods NOTE 1 - - 400,000 400,000 400,000 Construction Fund Subtotal 1,617,072 1,680,000 2,251,550 2,567,000 2,630,000 Increase From Prior Year (%)63.00%3.89%34.02%14.01%2.45% HRA Fund Levies HRA Operating Levy - - 95,000 125,000 160,000 HRA Fund Subtotal - - 95,000 125,000 160,000 Increase From Prior Year (%)31.58%28.00% Total Property Tax Levy 29,700,010$ 31,799,123$ 33,822,369$ 35,784,777$ 37,431,021$ Increase From Prior Year (%)8.18%7.07%6.36%5.80%4.60% NOTE 1:The City made an offer to purchase a portion of Weber Woods from the City of Minneapolis in 2016 and used Construction Fund reserves to finance the purchase. The levy shown here is to restore the Construction Fund reserves to the pre-purchase level over the next three years. G:\Budget and CIP\2018 Budget\Budget Book\Financials\2018 Summary charts v.1.xlsx 11/26/2018 CITY OF EDINA Consolidated Proposed Budget 2016 2017 2018 2019 Actual Budget Budget Budget REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 31,354,023$ 33,822,369$ 35,784,777$ 5.8%37,431,021$ 4.6% Tax increments 2,779,097 2,500,000 4,900,000 96.0%5,315,000 8.5% Franchise fees & other taxes 2,369,047 2,365,000 2,647,500 11.9%3,397,500 28.3% Special assessments 5,276,194 4,612,026 4,053,411 -12.1%3,956,273 -2.4% Licenses and permits 5,268,519 4,282,660 4,426,930 3.4%4,789,430 8.2% Intergovernmental 6,120,211 2,843,550 3,043,573 7.0%1,663,977 -45.3% Charges for services 4,689,389 11,327,973 11,592,004 2.3%4,721,523 -59.3% Fines and forfeitures 1,016,817 975,000 900,000 -7.7%900,000 0.0% Operating revenue 42,412,549 41,831,333 43,869,840 4.9%47,695,044 8.7% Investment income 480,552 380,389 554,779 45.8%564,779 1.8% Other revenue 4,718,424 644,711 920,761 42.8%653,861 -29.0% Debt issued 8,008,604 3,108,982 2,817,566 -9.4%2,648,269 -6.0% TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 114,493,426 108,693,993 115,511,141 6.3%113,736,677 -1.5% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY DEPARTMENT Administration 15,239,526 25,005,618 35,402,317 41.6%23,234,764 -34.4% Communications & tech.1,424,781 1,367,817 1,742,558 27.4%2,096,724 20.3% Human resources 1,480,967 1,577,755 1,742,435 10.4%1,748,694 0.4% Finance 1,170,598 1,190,149 1,418,338 19.2%1,483,534 4.6% Public works 25,205,262 26,185,390 23,912,019 -8.7%25,324,553 5.9% Engineering 13,003,723 8,439,098 8,583,517 1.7%7,175,297 -16.4% Police 11,872,525 12,435,592 13,166,202 5.9%13,620,838 3.5% Fire 8,176,539 7,878,906 9,201,139 16.8%9,180,218 -0.2% Parks & recreation 14,067,322 11,594,747 16,585,943 43.0%18,339,940 10.6% Community development 2,786,936 2,134,977 2,037,094 -4.6%1,966,996 -3.4% Debt service 7,607,202 11,550,961 7,600,886 -34.2%7,684,860 1.1% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 102,035,381 109,361,010 121,392,448 11.0%111,856,418 -7.9% EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold 10,051,670 9,803,441 10,178,080 3.8%10,578,807 3.9% Personal services 34,620,118 34,592,138 37,239,222 7.7%40,018,771 7.5% Contractual services 16,613,557 17,592,851 18,539,560 5.4%19,050,264 2.8% Commodities 3,899,798 4,279,465 4,512,333 5.4%4,944,488 9.6% Central services 4,988,582 5,631,215 5,845,860 3.8%5,913,624 1.2% Equipment 1,643,943 1,440,222 2,417,697 67.9%2,318,100 -4.1% Capital outlay 15,143,632 16,971,709 26,380,946 55.4%12,153,872 -53.9% Depreciation 6,686,539 6,913,750 7,646,250 10.6%8,268,250 8.1% Debt service 8,387,542 12,136,219 8,632,500 -28.9%8,610,242 -0.3% TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 102,035,381 109,361,010 121,392,448 11.0%111,856,418 -7.9% CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION 12,458,045 (667,017) (5,881,307) 1,880,259 11/26/2018 CITY OF EDINA Proposed Budget by Fund Type Governmental Enterprise Governmental Enterprise Funds Funds Total Funds Funds Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy 35,784,777$ -$ 35,784,777$ 37,431,021$ -$ 37,431,021$ Tax increments 4,900,000 - 4,900,000 5,315,000 - 5,315,000 Franchise fees 2,647,500 - 2,647,500 3,397,500 - 3,397,500 Special assessments 4,053,411 - 4,053,411 3,956,273 - 3,956,273 Licenses and permits 4,426,930 - 4,426,930 4,789,430 - 4,789,430 Intergovernmental 2,833,573 210,000 3,043,573 1,553,977 110,000 1,663,977 Charges for services 11,592,004 - 11,592,004 4,721,523 - 4,721,523 Fines and forfeitures 900,000 - 900,000 900,000 - 900,000 Operating revenue - 43,869,840 43,869,840 - 47,695,044 47,695,044 Investment income 401,779 153,000 554,779 401,779 163,000 564,779 Other revenue 884,761 36,000 920,761 610,861 43,000 653,861 Transfers 3,476,023 650,000 4,126,023 3,548,163 700,000 4,248,163 Debt issued 2,817,566 - 2,817,566 2,648,269 - 2,648,269 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES 74,718,324 44,918,840 119,637,164 69,273,796 48,711,044 117,984,840 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY FUNCTION Administration 23,063,964 12,338,353 35,402,317 10,568,602 12,666,162 23,234,764 Communication & tech.1,742,558 - 1,742,558 2,096,724 - 2,096,724 Human resources 882,435 860,000 1,742,435 888,694 860,000 1,748,694 Finance 1,048,449 369,889 1,418,338 1,099,125 384,409 1,483,534 Public works 7,361,066 16,550,953 23,912,019 8,000,677 17,323,876 25,324,553 Engineering 8,241,286 342,231 8,583,517 6,827,879 347,418 7,175,297 Police 12,643,660 522,542 13,166,202 13,082,656 538,182 13,620,838 Fire 9,201,139 - 9,201,139 9,180,218 - 9,180,218 Parks & recreation 5,585,087 11,000,856 16,585,943 5,876,635 12,463,305 18,339,940 Community development 2,037,094 - 2,037,094 1,966,996 - 1,966,996 Debt service 7,600,886 - 7,600,886 7,684,860 - 7,684,860 Transfers 3,226,023 900,000 4,126,023 3,298,163 950,000 4,248,163 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 82,633,647 42,884,824 125,518,471 70,571,229 45,533,352 116,104,581 EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Cost of goods sold - 10,178,080 10,178,080 - 10,578,807 10,578,807 Personal services 28,841,145 8,398,077 37,239,222 30,510,814 9,507,957 40,018,771 Contractual services 7,225,424 11,314,136 18,539,560 7,342,300 11,707,964 19,050,264 Commodities 2,637,798 1,874,535 4,512,333 2,897,376 2,047,112 4,944,488 Central services 4,303,728 1,542,132 5,845,860 4,365,744 1,547,880 5,913,624 Equipment 2,417,697 - 2,417,697 2,318,100 - 2,318,100 Capital outlay 26,380,946 - 26,380,946 12,153,872 - 12,153,872 Depreciation - 7,646,250 7,646,250 - 8,268,250 8,268,250 Debt service 7,600,886 1,031,614 8,632,500 7,684,860 925,382 8,610,242 Transfers 3,226,023 900,000 4,126,023 3,298,163 950,000 4,248,163 TOTAL EXPENDITURES, EXPENSES AND OTHER FINANCING USES 82,633,647 42,884,824 125,518,471 70,571,229 45,533,352 116,104,581 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE OR NET POSITION (7,915,323) 2,034,016 (5,881,307) (1,297,433) 3,177,692 1,880,259 2018 Budget 2019 Budget 11/26/2018 2019-2023 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2019-2023 EDINA CITY COUNCIL Mayor James Hovland Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Mike Fischer Council Member Kevin Staunton Council Member Bob Stewart CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1.Introduction Overview 1 Organization 2 Vision Edina 3 Budget & Work Plan Process 4 Budget Goals 5 CIP Introduction CIP Process 5-6 6-7 Funding Sources and Financing 8-12 2.Funded Detail Project Data Funded Projects by Category Summary Buildings 13-16 17 Summary Facility Improvements 18-19 Detail Project Data Equipment and Vehicles 20-44 45 Detail Project Data 46-72 Infrastructure 73-74 Summary Street Reconstruction 75-76 Summary Pedestrian/Bike Improvements 77-78 Detail Project Data Land Detail Project Data Parks 79-160 161 162 163 Detail Project Data Technology 164-166 167 Detail Project Data 168-182 3.Appendix Unfunded Projects by Category Summary 183-184 Followed by Detail Project Data Buildings 185-229 Equipment and Vehicles 230-248 Land 249-250 Parks 251-269 Technology 270-274 4.Glossary 275-277 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 1 The City of Edina has over $500 million invested in capital assets that either need to be maintained or replaced. This number includes such things as land, buildings, roads, water and sewer lines, vehicles and equipment. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is one of several ways that the City supports Vision Edina. Edina’s 2019-2023 Capital Improvements Plan is a five year, $143 million plan. Approximately $112 million is planned for infrastructure projects, with approximately $27 million planned for road and bridge projects, $2.7 million for trails/sidewalks, $55 million for water and sewer projects, and over $21 million planned for stormwater improvements. Another $15 million is planned for vehicle and equipment replacement, over $8 million for building improvements, $3 million for land acquisition, and $3 million on technology. Staff has identified another $51.4 million in projects that are currently unfunded but also shown in the CIP. The 2019-2023 CIP includes 152 separate projects with planned funding, which is up slightly over the number of projects with planned funding included in the 2017-2021 Adopted CIP of 143.The number of Buildings category projects increased from five to 24 ($450 thousand to $8.3 million) due to the City’s sustainability initiatives and completion of the three year inventory documentation of buildings and components. An additional $4.1 million has been added to Equipment and Vehicles which is reflective of the new replacement strategy for emergency vehicle replacement. Proposed Infrastructure spending has increased by $22.8 million over the previous plan primarily due to the new Southdale Water Treatment Plan with an estimated cost of $15 million. Although most projects from the 2017-2021 Adopted CIP are included in the 2019-2023 CIP, the amounts and timing of many of these projects have been adjusted. The proposed CIP is $36.1 million higher due to the net effect of these adjustments. The 2019-2023 CIP is designed to be a financially viable plan for specific infrastructure projects, based on existing and proposed funding availability and on policy guidance provided by the City Council. The CIP represents a macrolevel plan including priority projects and planned funding. In this document, projects with planned funding are referred to as “Funded”, while projects without current funding are referred to as “Unfunded”. The actual implementation of this plan occurs when the City Council takes action to initiate an individual project. By adopting the CIP, the Council is providing overall policy guidance on a long-term community investment plan. The actual formal approval of individual projects typically occurs later, when they are presented individually to the City Council for initiation. In addition to consideration of the overall project plan, the CIP serves as a mechanism to highlight policy issues that could significantly impact future capital project funding. These issues are presented as an opportunity for the City Council to provide additional guidance to staff if appropriate. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 2 ORGANIZATION The City of Edina operates under the Council-Manager form of government. Policy-making and legislative authority are vested in a City Council (Council) consisting of the Mayor and four other members, all elected on a non-partisan basis. The Council is responsible, among other things, for adopting the budget, approving ordinances, appointing committees and hiring the City Manager. Council members serve four-year terms, with two Council members elected every two years. The Mayor also serves a four-year term. The Council and Mayor are elected at large. The City Manager is responsible for carrying out the policies and ordinances of the Council and for overseeing the day-to-day operations of the city government. Edina has six “operating” departments and three “supporting” departments, in addition to the Administration Department which includes the City Manager and Assistant City Manager. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 3 VISION EDINA Vision Edina is a long-term strategic framework that helps our community understand and guide the important decision making that will impact Edina’s future. The Vision Edina work and publications have been developed through a broad based and inclusive community visioning process conducted in 2014. This framework lays out the City’s vision, and mission. Vision: Edina holds a well-earned reputation as a city of choice. It is the model of a successful, mature, and progressive urban community, that strives to lead in a modern and evolving world. We maintain our heritage and attractiveness, and afford our residents the highest quality of life, while actively embracing the future. The features that define our future community include: Inclusive and Connected * Built-to-Scale Development * Sustainable Environment * Community of Learning * Future-Oriented Mission: To provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Eight key strategic focus areas have emerged through the Vision Edina process. This framework lays out the key issues identified by our community, which we need to focus our attention and resources on over the coming years. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 4 BUDGET & WORK PLAN PROCESS In the City of Edina, the Capital Improvement Plan is part of a comprehensive approach to performance management supporting Vision Edina. The City Council and staff develop a two-year Budget Work Plan to coincide with the operating budget. The objective is to take an alternating year approach to the operating budget and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) processes. While both the operating budget and CIP will be reviewed every year, the majority of the planning, focus and effort will alternate between the two. The process begins with identifying the goals, objectives, and actions that will put the City in the best position to achieve the outcomes identified in the City’s strategic plans. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 5 The following Budget Goals were identified by the City’s Leadership Team and City Council for the 2018-2019 operating budget cycle: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) - INTRODUCTION The CIP represents a framework for planning the preservation and expansion of infrastructure, facilities, equipment and technology while at the same time advancing towards our long-term vision. The CIP is the first step towards estimating the schedule, costs and sources of revenues to pay for higher priority projects. The City’s threshold for projects or equipment to be included in the CIP is $20,000. Projects or equipment expected to be under the threshold are part of the operating budget. The definition of capital assets differs for financial accounting purposes. The main difference is that the CIP may include maintenance expenditures that do not meet the GAAP definition of a capital asset. The preparation of a long-range plan requires City staff to make material estimates about project scope, costs of labor and materials, future interest rates and other items. Many times these estimates come from staff experience, projections published in other sources, vendor estimates, or a combination of several sources. Generally, the CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 6 estimates for earlier years are more precise than later years. Actual results can differ significantly from such estimates. Projects have been presented based on those projects with planned funding (“Funded”) and those without current funding (“Unfunded”). Beginning with this CIP, 2019-2023, the City implemented a formal departmental scoring process that standardizes priorities and functions across departments. The departmental scoring is based upon six criteria: Asset Condition – a range of whether the current asset meets the basic level of service or is deficient with existing conditions, capacity and longevity Operations & Maintenance – impact on on-going operations and maintenance cost such as an increase, cost neutrality or a cost reduction Health, Safety & Regulatory Compliance – mitigation of regulatory/legal compliance, public health risk or safety hazard if present Efficiency, Accuracy, & Decision Making – improvement in cost/time efficiency, decision making and/or transparency Level of Service – impact on level of service ranging from significant improvement in an existing/new service to avoidance of a decline in service Environmental Impact – representative of an increase or reduction in current energy use, operational waste, water quality, or stormwater retention CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PROCESS For both the CIP and the operating budget, it is the responsibility of City staff to gather information and develop a recommendation for the City Council to consider. City Council’s role is to guide City staff through the process and to formally adopt a CIP near the end of every even-numbered year. After adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan, staff will develop more recommendations about how to proceed with specific projects, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 7 which are again considered by the City Council before work starts, in most circumstances. The following illustrates City Council’s oversight through the CIP process: eps Important milestones for the 2018-2023 CIP development process are shown below: Date Event Action December 2017 Council Meeting Approve 2018/2019 Budget & Work Plan April 2018 Staff Leadership Meeting CIP staff kickoff April/May 2018 CIP Preparation Departments prepare forms June 2018 Submission to Finance Forms & Scoring due June/July 2018 CIP Equalization & Prioritization Committee Review August 2018 Staff Leadership Meeting Draft CIP reviewed August 2018 Council Work Session Draft CIP presented September 2018 Council/HRA Meeting Council/HRA adopt preliminary levies November 2018 Council Work Session CIP and budget presented November/December 2018 Council/HRA Meeting Public hearing & adopt final budget & CIP CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 8 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - FUNDING SOURCES AND FINANCING Planning for capital improvements requires sound and economical financing. The City of Edina has many options for funding sources and financing. The exact funding method for each improvement is based on the City’s general policies, past practices, legal and practical considerations. The final selection and scheduling of proposed capital improvements is then based on the ability of the City to draw upon various funds. Many of the funding sources the City uses to pay for CIP projects are restricted as to use. The total cost for each project includes construction costs, administration costs and interest. The City’s annual comprehensive budget is approximately $125 million dollars. Much of that budget is spent on operating costs to provide services, like employees and vendors. Part of the annual budget also pays for debt service on debt that has already been issued to pay for past projects. The final part of the budget is for capital improvements, and is the focus of this plan. The graphic below is a conceptual diagram of the City’s budget, which is split between governmental activities and enterprise activities. The areas highlighted in yellow are those that typically have CIP needs. Edina Consolidated Budget $125M Governmental Funds $82M General Fund $41M Debt Service Fund $8M Construction Fund $11M Special Revenue Funds, including HRA Enterprise Funds $43MUtility Fund $18M Liquor Fund $13M Park Enterprises $12M CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 9 The following illustrates the funded 2019-2023 CIP by funding source for all plan years: Source 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total Construction Fund Construction Fund: Available Funding 2,051,624 1,251,600 50,000 50,000 250,000 3,653,224 Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 5,507,432 3,125,257 2,695,460 2,156,116 2,773,240 16,257,505 Construction Fund: Grants & Donations 250,000 250,000 Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 280,000 2,460,960 700,000 2,142,000 250,000 5,832,960 Construction Fund: Park Dedication 1,230,300 1,230,300 Construction Fund: Special Assessments 4,163,076 4,879,038 4,192,516 5,976,319 4,427,807 23,638,756 Construction Fund Total 13,232,432 11,716,855 7,887,976 10,324,435 7,701,047 50,862,745 Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Fund HRA Fund: 70th & Cahill TIF 300,000 - - - - 300,000 HRA Fund: Centennial Lakes TIF 995,000 70,000 50,000 50,000 100,000 1,265,000 HRA Fund: Grandview 2 TIF 451,000 - - - - 451,000 HRA Fund: Southdale 2 TIF - - 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 HRA Fund Total 1,746,000 70,000 3,050,000 50,000 100,000 5,016,000 Utility Fund Utility Fund: Sewer 3,275,344 4,180,021 4,550,884 1,581,943 4,289,726 17,877,918 Utility Fund: Storm 3,834,741 4,025,385 3,058,231 6,958,142 3,926,323 21,802,822 Utility Fund: Water 11,265,032 12,682,492 4,300,798 4,963,340 4,430,560 37,642,222 Utility Fund Total 18,375,117 20,887,898 11,909,913 13,503,425 12,646,609 77,322,962 Other Funds CAS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 965,000 865,000 600,000 500,000 500,000 3,430,000 PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 1,060,810 802,248 725,690 624,924 618,935 3,832,607 Liquor Fund 737,421 50,736 517,946 110,600 - 1,416,703 E911 - - 47,500 - - 47,500 General Fund 500,000 500,000 - - - 1,000,000 Other Funds Total 3,263,231 2,217,984 1,891,136 1,235,524 1,118,935 9,726,810 Total Funded CIP 36,616,780 34,892,737 24,739,025 25,113,384 21,566,591 142,928,517 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 10 2019-2023 Funded CIP by Funding Source 1. Construction Fund – Includes the equipment levy, grants and donations, grants from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and any special assessments as well as transfers from other funds. 2. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Fund - Accounts for the activities of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Sources of revenue in this fund include are from tax increment districts. 3. Utility Enterprise Funds - Offer four services, water, sewer, storm sewer and recycling where fees are set to fund the infrastructure. 4. Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) Fund: Utility Franchise Fees - Collects money from a utility franchise fee to be used for projects that promote conservation and sustainability. 5. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund: Utility Franchise Fees - Collects money from a utility franchise fee to be used for projects that promote pedestrian and bike safety, usually by building sidewalks, paths and trails. 6. PD Special Revenue Fund – Includes restricted revenue sources for E-911 and federal and state forfeiture funds. 7. Liquor Fund – Contributes to own operations and capital improvements as well as supporting other City enterprise funds. Construction Fund Total 36% HRA Fund Total 3% Utility Fund Total 54% CAS Fund 2% PACS Fund 3% Other 2% CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 11 For many of the above funding sources, the City and/or the HRA may decide to sell bonds to pay the upfront costs of a project when cash flows from the project funding sources are not immediately available. For other projects without a dedicated funding source (utility revenues, franchise fees, etc.), one of the few options available to pay for this type of project is a tax levy. Shown below is a strategy whereby an increase in the CIP levy is offset by expiring levies for Weber Woods and the City Hall debt service. Projected CIP Levy In 2018, the City completed a three-year review process of 117 buildings to create a master replacement schedule for physical buildings, plumbing, HVAC and other mechanical systems, components, fixtures and equipment to optimize long-term financial resources and meet sustainability goals. Building improvement projects submitted for the 2019-2023 CIP include maintenance identified through the new data collected. Maintaining physical assets and infrastructure is the primary goal for the 2018-2019 budget cycle. To begin to address the building improvement projects coming forward as well as maintenance and replacement of existing park facilities, an increase to the Capital Improvement Plan Levy has been proposed. The increase to the Capital Improvement Plan Levy would not result in an increase in the amount of dollars levied for this purpose as the increase would be offset by decreases in other expiring levies. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 12 Following is a view of 2019-2023 total projects submitted for the plan. This depicts projects with and without a planned funding source: Buildings - maintenance of current buildings (windows, HVAC, flooring, etc.), new/ replacement park shelters Equipment & Vehicles – life cycle replacement of squad cars, ambulances, mowers, etc. Infrastructure – streets, pathways, bridge railings, water lines, etc. Land – types of purchases may include property for affordable housing projects Parks – life cycle replacement of playground equipment and irrigation as well as new park projects such as Braemar Park development Technology – Fiber installation, security systems, various software The below represents 2019-2023 funded projects: Buildings 21% Equipment & Vehicles 8% Infrastructure 58% Land 2% Parks 9% Technology 2% Buildings 6% Equipment & Vehicles 11% Infrastructure 78% Land 2% Parks 1%Technology 2% Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Buildings 15-106 290,000290,000Salt Storage Facility 17-030 25,00025,000Braemar Golf Cart Storage Upgrade 17-047 429,000429,000Edinborough Park SE Plaza Entrance Reconstruction 17-190 60,00060,000City Hall Blding Security & Efficiency - Phase I 19-002 50,00050,000New Liquor Store- Study 19-004 450,000450,000City Hall Lighting Retrofit 19-006 300,00050,000 250,000City Hall ECO Efficiency Plan 19-007 250,000150,000 100,000Edinborough ECO Efficiency 19-008 1,250,000250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000Facility Replacement Efficiency Upgrades 19-009 1,180,000215,000 215,000 250,000 250,000 250,000New Building Sustainability Additions 19-304 50,00030,000 20,000District Parking Engagement 44th and France 19-701 50,00050,000Aquatic Center - Main Pool Painting 19-703 137,000137,000Aquatic Center - Slide Tower Restoration 19-800 56,56856,568Computer Forensic Office 19-900 321,80090,000 231,800Water Treatment Plant 3 Facility Improvements 19-901 320,00060,000 260,000WTP #6 Ammonia Room Addition and Facility Imp. 19-903 48,70025,800 22,900Water Treatment Plant 4 Facility Imp. 19-904 63,40063,400Water Treatment Plant 2 Facility Imp. 19-922 246,600246,600Fire Station 1 Facility Improvements - Phase I 19-924 289,003158,821 50,736 79,44650th St. Edina Liquor Facility Improvements 19-925 446,000130,400 205,000 110,600Grandview Liquor Facility Improvements 19-926 410,700177,200 233,500Southdale Liquor Facility Improvement 19-947 247,00090,000 157,000North Parking Ramp Facility Improvements 19-948 1,374,79590,155 1,284,640South Parking Ramp Facility Improvement 8,345,5662,347,944 1,919,336 1,207,946 2,213,340 657,000Buildings Total Equipment and Vehicles 15-003 15,00015,000Assessing Division Equipment Replacement 15-005 1,387,548271,548 254,000 206,000 346,000 310,000Police Squad Cars 15-009 27,00027,000Police Squad Rifles 15-107 4,154,245835,200 844,300 883,010 765,000 826,735PW and Park Maintenance Equipment Replacement 15-108 1,654,000148,000 300,000 247,000 322,000 637,000Utilities Equipment Replacement 15-114 378,000378,000Anti-icing and De-icing Equipment 15-181 81,00028,000 28,000 25,000Engineering Equipment Replacement 15-182 1,422,735566,140 243,800 91,000 249,290 272,505CTS Equipment Replacement 15-226 25,00025,000Election Equipment Replacement 17-049 175,000175,000ARMER Radios (Public Works) 17-154 24,00024,000Floor Scrubber 17-155 22,00022,000Building Inspections Staff Vehicle (2020) 17-158 40,00040,000Utility Pick-up Truck 17-193 110,000110,000Fire Command Staff Vehicles (2021) 19-001 143,000143,000Liquor Store Fixture/furniture Replacements 19-005 25,00025,000EV Infrastructure - Phase I 19-501 35,00035,000Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillator 19-504 50,00030,000 20,000Thermal Imaging Cameras Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 13 Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # 19-506 37,00037,000Utility Pick-up Vehicle 19-507 28,00028,000Lucas CPR Device 19-509 22,00022,000Building Inspections Staff Vehicle 19-513 175,000175,000Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillators 19-515 37,00037,000Ultrasound Devices 19-516 3,250,0003,250,000Replace fire engine/truck fleet 19-517 1,002,8321,002,832Replace ambulance fleet (4) 19-764 849,32554,000 80,325 93,000 115,000 507,000Parks Equipment Replacement 19-802 200,000200,000Body-Worn Cameras 15,369,6855,643,888 3,408,257 1,630,010 1,914,290 2,773,240Equipment and Vehicles Total Infrastructure 15-104 120,000120,000Well #16 Rehab 15-140 4,033,9184,033,918Chowen Park A Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15-141 2,525,6222,525,622Chowen Park B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15-147 1,000,0001,000,000Sanitary Trunk Capacity Expansion 15-150 1,025,0001,025,000Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 15-162 15,000,0007,750,000 7,250,000New Water Treatment Plant 5 - Southdale 15-164 700,00050,000 650,000Well 21 and Raw Water Line 15-189 215,00015,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000Gateway Signs 17-006 140,000140,000Centennial Lakes Pathway Replacement 17-011 580,000580,000W 69th Street Eastbound Left Turn Lane 17-012 750,000750,000Vernon Avenue Intersection Improvements 17-014 451,000451,000Arcadia Avenue Improvements 17-018 50,00050,000Valley View Rd Bicycle Facility Improvements 17-020 3,959,0943,959,094Blake Road Reconstruction 17-024 1,007,2021,007,202Grandview A Reconstruction 17-026 4,455,4204,455,420Melody Lake A Reconstruction 17-063 2,943,3492,943,349Indian Trails B/C Reconstruction 17-064 320,708320,708Todd Park E Reconstruction 17-067 4,421,2994,421,299Morningside D/E Reconstruction 17-070 779,000303,400 475,600Valley View Road Sidewalk 17-072 86,40086,400Highway 169 Frontage Road Sidewalk 17-078 1,200,0001,200,000Lake Edina and South Cornelia Trunk Sewer Rehab 17-080 2,050,000500,000 50,000 700,000 800,000Watermain Rehabilitation 17-081 3,127,4102,992,410 45,000 35,000 30,000 25,000Arden Park Restoration Project & Shelter Building 17-082 75,00075,000Sunnyslope Road Shoreline Stabilization 17-083 605,00085,000 110,000 110,000 150,000 150,000Pond and Outlet Maintenance Projects 17-104 150,000150,000Well #8 Rehab 17-106 120,000120,000Well #12 Rehab 17-107 120,000120,000Well #19 Rehab 19-300 525,000525,000Bridge - Benton Avenue Over CP Rail 19-301 1,050,0001,050,000Bridge - Wooddale Ave Bridge Historic Rehab 19-302 400,000400,000Bridge - Centennial Lakes Bridge Railings 19-303 525,000525,000Bridge - Valley View Over CP Rail 19-305 325,000325,000Wooddale Ave and Valley View Rd Traffic Signal 19-306 4,469,4574,469,457West 58th Street Reconstruction 19-308 4,178,9474,178,947Prospect Knolls C Reconstruction 19-309 959,041959,041Prospect Knolls D Reconstruction 19-310 3,161,2063,161,206Presidents B Reconstruction 19-311 5,335,5785,335,578Morningside C Reconstruction 19-314 2,145,0672,145,067Indian Trails A Reconstruction 19-315 379,141379,141Indian Hills C Reconstruction 19-317 5,607,2055,607,205Prospect Knolls A Reconstruction 19-318 1,167,0471,167,047Morningside E Reconstruction 19-319 4,280,0964,280,096Melody Lake B Reconstruction 19-320 2,472,4142,472,414Birchcrest C Reconstruction 19-321 2,592,4962,592,496Creek Knoll A Reconstruction Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 14 Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # 19-322 1,010,7131,010,713Creek Knoll B Reconstruction 19-323 115,000115,000Hillary Lane Shared Use Path 19-324 35,00035,000Tracy Avenue Shared Use Path 19-325 70,00070,000W 77th Street Sidewalk 19-326 50,00050,000Valley View Road Buffered Bike Lanes 19-327 215,260215,260Gleason Road (South) Shared Use Path 19-328 292,300292,300Cornelia Elementary School Sidewalks 19-329 113,800113,800Valley Lane/Ridgeview Drive Bike Lanes 19-330 308,100308,100Gleason Road (North) Shared Use Path 19-331 91,20091,200Eden Avenue Shared Use Path 19-332 224,300224,300Dewey Hill Road Shared Use Path 19-333 409,200409,200McCauley Trail Shared Use Path 19-334 533,500533,500Olinger Boulevard Sidewalk 19-335 2,500,0002,500,000Sanitary Trunk Capacity Expansion York Segs 2-3 19-336 3,000,0003,000,000Sanitary Trunk Capacity Exp York Seg 4 & Fairview 19-337 275,00025,000 250,000Sanitary Trunk Capacity Exp Grandview Lift Station 19-338 900,000900,000Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation 19-339 550,000550,000Lift Station 3 Rehabilitation 19-340 200,00070,000 130,000Sanitary Targeted Inflow Reduction Project 19-341 4,250,000250,000 2,500,000 1,500,000Flood Protect Strat & Morningside Weber Flood Proj 19-342 850,000250,000 600,000Clean Wtr Strat & Lake Cornelia Clean Water Proj 19-345 40,00040,000SWPPP Major Amendment and Model Update 19-346 167,000167,000CWRMP Major Amendment and Model Update 19-347 525,000275,000 30,000 120,000 50,000 50,000Stormwater Best Management Practices Maintenance 19-348 318,000318,000Grandview Area Watermain Improvements PH 1 19-349 240,000240,000Grandview Area Watermain Improvements PH 2 19-351 655,000120,000 125,000 130,000 140,000 140,000Water Main Condition Assessment 19-908 800,000800,000Recondition Coating System, Community Center Tower 19-909 70,00070,000Tower and Reservoir Mixers 19-910 150,000150,000Well #2 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement 19-913 120,000120,000Well #7 Rehabilitation 19-914 420,000420,000Well #10 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement 19-915 420,000420,000Well #11 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvements 19-916 166,000166,000Well #13 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement 19-917 166,000166,000Well #17 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement 19-918 120,000120,000Well #20 Rehabilitation 111,953,49027,344,948 28,555,144 17,403,119 20,478,928 18,171,351Infrastructure Total Land 17-002 3,000,0003,000,000HRA Land Acquisition for Affordable Housing 3,000,0003,000,000Land Total Parks 19-343 300,000100,000 100,000 100,000Shoreline Naturalization 19-344 340,00050,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 80,000Natural Areas Maintenance 19-766 A 300,000300,000Fred Richards Park Renovation - Phase I 940,000450,000 160,000 170,000 80,000 80,000Parks Total Technology 15-173 175,00035,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000Asset Management Software and Equipment 15-184 145,00095,000 50,000Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling 17-001 78,00078,000Grandview/50th Camera System 17-050 42,00042,000Police Computer Forensic Equipment 17-052 92,27645,000 15,450 31,826Police License Plate Reader (ALPR) Replacement 17-054 1,000,0001,000,000Police Public Safety CAD and RMS Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 15 Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # 17-055 20,00020,000Police CAD Workstations 17-057 80,00030,000 50,000Police Dispatch Radio Console Connectivity 17-058 27,50027,500Police Emergency Medical Dispatch Software 17-157 100,000100,000EOC Video/Computer Technology 17-163 50,00050,000City of Edina Network Storage 18-001 1,000,000500,000 500,000ERP System 19-503 210,000210,000Plan Review Software 19-906 120,000120,000Fiber Installation, LS #6 and WTP #3 19-907 180,000180,000Fiber Installation, WTP #4 3,319,776830,000 850,000 1,327,950 276,826 35,000Technology Total GRAND TOTAL 142,928,51736,616,780 34,892,737 24,739,025 24,963,384 21,716,591 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 16 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Buildings 15-106 290,000290,000Salt Storage Facility 17-030 25,00025,000Braemar Golf Cart Storage Upgrade 17-047 429,000429,000Edinborough Park SE Plaza Entrance Reconstruction 17-190 60,00060,000City Hall Blding Security & Efficiency - Phase I 19-002 50,00050,000New Liquor Store- Study 19-004 450,000450,000City Hall Lighting Retrofit 19-006 300,00050,000 250,000City Hall ECO Efficiency Plan 19-007 250,000150,000 100,000Edinborough ECO Efficiency 19-008 1,250,000250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000Facility Replacement Efficiency Upgrades 19-009 1,180,000215,000 215,000 250,000 250,000 250,000New Building Sustainability Additions 19-304 50,00030,000 20,000District Parking Engagement 44th and France 19-701 50,00050,000Aquatic Center - Main Pool Painting 19-703 137,000137,000Aquatic Center - Slide Tower Restoration 19-800 56,56856,568Computer Forensic Office 19-900 321,80090,000 231,800Water Treatment Plant 3 Facility Improvements 19-901 320,00060,000 260,000WTP #6 Ammonia Room Addition and Facility Imp. 19-903 48,70025,800 22,900Water Treatment Plant 4 Facility Imp. 19-904 63,40063,400Water Treatment Plant 2 Facility Imp. 19-922 246,600246,600Fire Station 1 Facility Improvements - Phase I 19-924 289,003158,821 50,736 79,44650th St. Edina Liquor Facility Improvements 19-925 446,000130,400 205,000 110,600Grandview Liquor Facility Improvements 19-926 410,700177,200 233,500Southdale Liquor Facility Improvement 19-947 247,00090,000 157,000North Parking Ramp Facility Improvements 19-948 1,374,79590,155 1,284,640South Parking Ramp Facility Improvement 8,345,5662,347,944 1,919,336 1,207,946 2,213,340 657,000Buildings Total GRAND TOTAL 8,345,5662,347,944 1,919,336 1,207,946 2,213,340 657,000 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 17 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Summary20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description In 2018, the City completed a three-year review process of 117 buildings to create a master replacement schedule for physical buildings, plumbing, HVAC and other mechanical systems, components, fixtures and equipment to optimize long-term financial resources and meet sustainability goals. The results of this evaluation are documented in the Asset & Energy Management (AEMP) report prepared by CR-BPS Inc. Building improvement projects submitted for the 2019-2023 CIP include maintenance identified through the new data collected. This program used the Building Owners Managers Association(BOMA) standards to schedule replacements for critical building envelope components the City has 88 buildings covered in this program with a value of $169,000,000 Types of components include the building foundations,superstructures, mechanicals and electrical systems, plumbing, roofing, flooring, window and door systems,up to 50 total components based on the buildings complexity and design. This summary includes the following projects: 19-900 - Water Treatment Plant #3 Facility Improvements 19-902 - Well #17 Facility Improvements 19-903 - Water Treatment Plant #4 Facility Improvements 19-904 - Water Treatment Plant #2 Facility Improvements 19-905 - Well #16 Facility Improvements 19-924 - 50th St. Edina Liquor Facility Improvements 19-925 - Grandview Edina Liquor Facility Improvements 19-926 - Southdale Edina Liquor Facility Improvements 19-947 - North Parking Ramp Facility Improvements 19-922 - Fire Station 1 Facility Improvements Phase I ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The City has adopted the carbon emissions reduction goal of 25% by 2025. Renewal of the exterior doors and lighting, and roofing, and gas unit heaters, and fire alarm,will keep our buildings safe and provide and increased airtightness which will increase our buildings heating efficiencies, cutting down on our energy consumption. Project #Fac. Imp. Justification This is a part of our City Work plan to maintain optimum facility operations. Deferral of maintenance is always more expensive.The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” These projects follow the mission statement by providing effective and values public services and maintaining a sound public infrastructure to sustain and improve the high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Useful Life Project Name Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$2,192,526 Dept Scoring Summary Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 493,600246,600 90,000 157,000Construction 1,613,803582,221 50,736 517,946 462,900Installation/Maintenance 582,221 297,336 607,946 462,900 157,000 2,107,403Total Future 85,123 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 246,600246,600Construction Fund: Available Funding 247,00090,000 157,000Construction Fund: Special Assessments 1,145,703466,421 50,736 517,946 110,600Liquor Fund 468,100115,800 352,300Utility Fund: Water Future 85,123 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 18 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Summary20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes 582,221 297,336 607,946 462,900 157,000 2,107,403Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 19 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Shawn Anderson Description This would be an off site storage structure. It would hold up to 5,000 ton of salt. The building would be at our cold storage area at the Braemar dump-site. A meeting with a contractor confirmed that it could be built at this location. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This would be a very safe, and workable salt storage facility. Putting the salt in a covered enclosed structure. Also controlled drainage is vital to a cities excess salt storage. COST CONSIDERATIONS: This would fall under the street departments buildings. Very little maintenance will be needed on this building. Project #15-106 Justification This would show initiative and strive to improve our operations. Allowing us to not be so dependent on others when weather and conditions dictate this across the region. We need to have this control with our own future when it comes to the level of service we need to provide for our residents. The winter of 2013-2014 proved to the staff at the City of Edina that we do need to have a stockpile of salt. This is vital to our service commitment to our residents. Allowing us to also save budget dollars by being able to carry salt from a mild year into the next very efficiently. Useful Life Project Name Salt Storage Facility Category Buildings Type New Total Project Cost:$290,000 Dept Scoring 29 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 290,000290,000Construction 290,000 290,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 290,000290,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 290,000 290,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 20 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description The Braemar Golf Cart Storage areas need to be upgraded to house an all electric golf cart fleet. A new fleet of golf carts will be leased in 2018 and the present electrical system in the clubhouse cannot accommodate the electrical requirements. The existing fleet is a mix of gas and electric carts. The vast majority of golf patrons at Braemar prefer an electric golf cart over a gas model. Electric carts are more energy efficient, produce less pollutants and are substantially quieter than their gas counterpart. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Electric carts are more energy efficient, produce less pollutants and are substantially quieter than their gas counterpart. Project #17-030 Justification Upgrading the current golf cart storage areas is required to transition from a hybrid, gas/electric golf cart fleet to an all electric golf cart fleet. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Cart Storage Upgrade Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$25,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 25,00025,000Construction 25,000 25,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 25,00025,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 25,000 25,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 21 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Edinborough Park20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description This was an approved 2013 CIP. The project was never completed because the scope changed dramatically as more information became available about the severity of the structural deterioration. The southeast plaza is the primary entrance to the park from the parking ramp and it has been deteriorating for several years. Although temporary repairs were made to the surface concrete in 2015 to alleviate the possibility of trips and falls in the immediate area, a total reconstruction of this area is necessary to alleviate other structural issues and create a positive first impression for guests visiting the park and entering the Corporate Center. As a direct result of this deterioration, water seeps into the park entryway, loading dock and the hallway inside the park that is underneath the plaza. The seeping has led to corrosion of internal mechanicals and equipment. Structural issues that need to be addressed include damage to the lower level loading dock, reconstruction of stairs between the loading dock and parking garage, reconstruction of the driveway to redirect the drainage issues and a more appropriate "roof" section that would have a waterproof barrier keeping water from coming into the building. Project #17-047 Justification Each year Edinborough Park has more than 125,000 visitors and the southeast plaza is the primary entrance from the parking ramp. This project was originally submitted as a CIP in 2013 when it was thought to be a simple concrete repair project. With further research, it was discovered that it was not just the concrete, but that the project needed significant structural improvements to alleviate serious drainage issues negatively impacting other parts of Edinborough Park. One of the most serious side effects of the leaking is damage to the interior hallway/tunnel area. Even during light rain showers or snow melt, water pours into the tunnel. The leaking water has corroded several electrical conduits and creates slipping hazards for staff. Repairing this correctly would prevent further deterioration and damage. Bolton and Menk, Inc. was hired as consulting engineers to help determine the actual scope of the project. The project now includes: 1. The need to repair the footing of the lower level loading dock, along with associated driveway reconstruction to redirect the drainage that has contributed to the current problem. 2. Reconstruction of the stairs between loading dock and parking garage to facilitate nearby drain pipe discharge extension. 3. The need for a more comprehensive replacement of railings, including integral concrete wall caps along the plaza, pedestrian bridge and stairwell. 4. The need to design a more appropriate roof section that captures water from building downspouts. The temporary repairs have alleviated the concern that a guest might trip and fall, however those repairs do not address the increasingly dangerous conditions inside outside the facility. The wall under the pedestrian bridge is deteriorating at a more rapid pace and now drops debris (pieces of bricks, cement grout, etc..) daily. Useful Life Project Name Edinborough Park SE Plaza Entrance Reconstruction Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$429,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 45,00045,000Planning and Design 384,000384,000Construction 429,000 429,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 429,000429,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 429,000 429,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 22 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Lisa Schaefer Description The current City Hall/Police Department facility opened at 2004 with a budget of $10.4 million. The single-building concept provided management and operational efficiencies for the City. The building was designed to be open and accessible to the public. Over a decade later, the building has served the City well. However, security and staffing needs have changed significantly since 2004. There is an opportunity to make some physical changes to the building in order to 1) improve security in public spaces, 2) increase efficiency of limited staff resources by combining some customer reception points, and 3) identify energy efficiency opportunities to meet sustainability goals and reduce operational utility bills, 4) allow more effective use of real estate by increasing workspace, meeting/training areas, and other flexible workspaces 5) make updates needed for legal compliance & wellness goals including improved nursing facilities and access to showers/fitness area for City Hall staff. ENVIRNMENTAL CONSIDERATION Construction renovations introduce the opportunity to make improvements to the facility for increased Sustainability and cost-efficiency. City Hall facility has one of the highest Energy Use Index (EUI) which means there is a large amount of energy used per square foot. Minnesota's B3 Benchmarking estimates there is potential for 2,607,000 kBtu annual energy savings and $64,000 annual energy savings at City Hall. Additionally, installing bike commuting amenities can have positive environmental impacts. Bike commuting over single vehicle occupancy commutes can decrease GHG emissions, improve air quality, and improve employee health. These new amenities will have an initial carbon footprint and some will have ongoing footprint and costs (ex: showers for commuters means more water use on site.) It will be important to design and install amenities in a sustainable manner so the overall footprint of these amenities remain positive to the environment. Project #17-190 Justification This project advances several identified goals in the 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan, including: Budget Goal #1: Maintain Physical Assets and Infrastructure. A core objective of budget goal #1 is to replace and maintain at the most cost-effective time. Another objective is to reduce carbon footprint and energy costs through facility maintenance and capital improvements, specifically citing City Hall as a building with the highest Energy Use Index. Significant FFEs, including carpet, furniture etc are original to the building, and have been extended past its useful life. It makes sense to evaluate building use prior to re-investment. Budget Goal #2: Maintain Service-Levels that Best Need the Needs of the Community. Remodeling city hall would coincide with the object to ensure compliance with state statutes and city-code, and also to insure resources are matched to service-level requirements limited resources (money, equipment, and time) are deployed in an equitable manner. This project will allow more effective use of real estate and provide competitive compensation, benefits, and work-life balance to attract and retain the next generation of workers. Additionally, the City's Mission statement reads "Our mission is to provide effective and valued public service, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses." This project improves the safety of our staff and improves the efficiency of our operations. In addition, the renovations allow us to maximize the utility of our spaces in order to meet the needs of both our staff and residents in order to provide the high level of services that our residents demand. Another consideration in support of this project is implementing a Flexible Workplace Program. The Minnesota unemployment rate is the lowest it has been since 2000 so it is imperative that we are innovative in our solutions to ensure we continue to attract and hire quality talent. Offering a Flexible Workplace Program to include alternative work schedules, shared workspaces to maximize workspace occupancy, and telework helps supports work-life balance for current and prospective employees. In addition, major long-term construction projects negatively impact commute times. Given most employees live outside of Edina and commute time undoubtedly factors into employee satisfaction and work-life balance, implementing a Commuter Benefit Program complements a Flexible Workplace Program. Combined, these programs will allow us to remain competitive with surrounding cities and companies. Useful Life Project Name City Hall Blding Security & Efficiency - Phase I Category Buildings Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$60,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 23 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Lisa Schaefer Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 60,00060,000Planning and Design 60,000 60,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 60,00060,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 60,000 60,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 24 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration: Liquor Stores20192023thru Contact Josh Furbish Description This proposal is for a formal study to project the potential profitability and success of a new store for the Edina Liquor Enterprise. The study will include location data, profit projections and a comprehensive analysis of what type of store (on-sale, off-sale or combined) would have the strongest return on investment. Project #19-002 Justification This project would allow us to gain insight into our ability to better serve the community with additional offerings and convenience. It also provides insight into our competitive landscape which has changed significantly over the past 5 years. If the study provides us with a clear business case for expansion, this will allow us to combat the increased competition on our borders. Useful Life Project Name New Liquor Store- Study Category Buildings Type New Total Project Cost:$50,000 Dept Scoring 10 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Planning and Design 50,000 50,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000Liquor Fund 50,000 50,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 25 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Noah Silver Description City Hall building is 15 years old. With age, lights and ballasts continue to go out, energy code has improved, and lighting needs have changed as the office space has changed. Updating lighting as they go out one by one, creates additional workload for our electricians. The automated lighting system is no longer supported by the vendor. There is an opportunity to replace lighting and the lighting automation system to deliver optimal lighting, reduce maintenance, and reduce utility bills. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Complete lighting retrofit will reduce energy pull and meet our City Facility goal of 5% electricity use reduction. This puts city operations on track to support the 30% GHG reduction by 2025 and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually." It will be important to create a design the meets the needs of current office use while keeping in mind the changes that will come. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Lighting retrofit will reduce ongoing operational costs. Project #19-004 Justification Retrofitting lighting supports 2018-2019 Budget Goal 1 "Maintain physical assets and infrastructure" and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually." Useful Life Project Name City Hall Lighting Retrofit Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$450,000 Dept Scoring 20 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 450,000450,000Installation/Maintenance 450,000 450,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 450,000450,000CAS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 450,000 450,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 26 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Tara Brown Description City Hall building is 15 years old. Currently, the building is one of the largest energy users within the City facility portfolio. The annual energy bill is approximately $150,000 and has a high energy use index(EUI) of 146. Identifying opportunities to lower energy use beyond lighting will be critical to creating a more consistent temperature environment, lowering the energy use, and lowering energy bills. Completing this review in conjunction with City Hall remodel will produce the greatest efficiency. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Completing eco efficiency upgrades will reduce energy pull and meet our City Facility goal of 5% electricity use reduction. This puts city operations on track to support the 30% GHG reduction by 2025 and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually". It will be important to create a design the meets the needs of current office use while keeping in mind the changes that will come. Project #19-006 Justification Eco efficiency upgrades support 2018-2019 Budget Goal 1 "Maintain physical assets and infrastructure" and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually". Useful Life Project Name City Hall ECO Efficiency Plan Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$300,000 Dept Scoring Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Planning and Design 250,000250,000Installation/Maintenance 50,000 250,000 300,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 300,00050,000 250,000CAS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 50,000 250,000 300,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 27 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Tara Brown Description Edinborough Park was built in 1986 and is home to many activities for the community. Currently, the building is one of the largest energy users within the City facility portfolio. The annual energy bill is approximately $150,000 and has a high energy use index(EUI) of 174. Identifying opportunities to lower energy use beyond lighting will be critical to creating a more consistent temperature environment, lowering the energy use, and lowering energy bills. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Completing eco efficiency upgrades will reduce energy pull and meet our City Facility goal of 5% electricity use reduction. This puts city operations on track to support the 30% GHG reduction by 2025 and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually". It will be important to prioritize efficiencies that align with the renewal of the systems currently in the building. Project #19-007 Justification Eco efficiency upgrades support 2018-2019 Budget Goal 1 "Maintain physical assets and infrastructure" and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually". Useful Life Project Name Edinborough ECO Efficiency Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$250,000 Dept Scoring Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Planning and Design 200,000100,000 100,000Installation/Maintenance 150,000 100,000 250,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 250,000150,000 100,000CAS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 150,000 100,000 250,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 28 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Tara Brown Description Replacing failing lighting, HVAC, and other systems with more energy efficient upgrades will reduce energy pull and meet our City Facility goal of 5% electricity use reduction. This work ensures replacement of systems will be completed with a balance of initial cost and ongoing energy costs to run the equipment. Projects should see a 10 year payback. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Replacing failing lighting, HVAC, and other systems with more energy efficient upgrades will reduce energy pull and meet our City Facility goal of 5% electricity use reduction. This puts city operations on track to support the 30% GHG reduction by 2025 and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually." It will be important to prioritize efficiencies that align with the renewal of the systems currently in the building. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS: This will reduce ongoing energy costs as well as maintenance costs to continually fix a systems that is past its life expectancy. Project #19-008 Justification Eco efficiency upgrades support 2018-2019 Budget Goal 1 "Maintain physical assets and infrastructure" and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually". Useful Life Project Name Facility Replacement Efficiency Upgrades Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,500,000 Dept Scoring Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,250,000250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000Installation/Maintenance 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000Total Future 250,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,250,000250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000CAS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000Total Future 250,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 29 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Tara Brown Description During the design and material selection of a building is the best time to make energy efficient upgrades. Designing to sustainability standards can take an additional 5%-15% of building costs. This project funding ensures the funds are there to design, buy, and certify sustainable building that meets our 30% GHG emission reduction goal. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Any new buildings have the potential to increase the City's carbon footprint. It will be critical to ensure any new buildings and their use are designed and built in a manner that creates as little of a carbon footprint as possible. This action will ensure there is not a large, negative impact to the 30% GHG reduction by 2025 goal. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS: Designing in a sustainable manner has the opportunity to lower ongoing operational costs. Project #19-009 Justification Eco efficiency upgrades support 2018-2019 Budget Goal 1 "Maintain physical assets and infrastructure" and Electricity Action Plan Goal to "Reduce city facility electricity usage 5% annually". Useful Life Project Name New Building Sustainability Additions Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,430,000 Dept Scoring Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,180,000215,000 215,000 250,000 250,000 250,000Installation/Maintenance 215,000 215,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,180,000Total Future 250,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,180,000215,000 215,000 250,000 250,000 250,000CAS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 215,000 215,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,180,000Total Future 250,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 30 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Bill Neuendorf Description The recently adopted 44th and France Small Area Plan Guiding Principle 7: Parking states "Parking should be hidden from view behind or beneath buildings on the west side of France Avenue. The large parking lots with multiple owners between Sunnyside and 44th Street should be re- imagined as a community parking facility that accommodates parking for the study area. The community parking facility should be designed to double as gathering space and should have the flexibility to change over time as other modes of transportation such as ride sharing because more common and fewer parking spaces are needed." ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Incorporating sustainability principles and standards during redevelopment with the goal of reducing the community’s carbon footprint will be critical to human health and safety. Creating sustainable redevelopment requires forward thinking and preparing for the future. This project will begin an engagement process with the current property owners to discuss this idea. Project #19-304 Justification The 2018 - 2019 Budget Work Plan Goal 3 "Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development" states redevelopment and renewal of commercial and residential real estate is essential to the vibrancy of the community. Redevelopment will play an integral part of providing an inclusive, high-quality of life that the Edina community expects. Incorporating sustainability principles and standards during redevelopment with the goal of reducing the community’s carbon footprint will be critical to human health and safety. Creating sustainable redevelopment requires forward thinking and preparing for the future. This project will be begin to develop that vision for parking in the 44th and France Area. Useful Life Project Name District Parking Engagement 44th and France Category Buildings Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$50,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 30,00020,000 10,000Planning and Design 20,00010,000 10,000Staff 30,000 20,000 50,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00030,000 20,000HRA Fund: Centennial Lakes TIF 30,000 20,000 50,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 31 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Aquatic Center20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description The main pool at the Aquatic Center is 60 years old. As part of ongoing maintenance it needs to be painted in 2019. The painting process includes acid etching and pressure washing the surface, two coats of epoxy pool paint with silica sand on stairs and walking areas, required demarcation lines, lap lanes and targets. With well over 150,000 guests using the pool each summer, the life expectancy of the paint is approximately five years. The pool was last painted in 2015 and prior to that in 2010. In addition to Season Pass holders, daily admissions and group visitors, the 50 Meter pool is heavily used by the Aquajets and the Edina Swim Club for their practice sessions. The lane lines and targets are essential components for the swim clubs and recreational lap swimmers. Painting of the main pool is critical to maintaining and extending the life of the swimming pool. Project #19-701 Justification In Vision Edina strategic focus area #4, Live and Work it notes that the city is very well endowed with recreation facilities which offer excellent outdoor and sporting amenities. The Aquatic Center has been serving the community for 60 years and has a reputation of a well maintained amenity that consistently serves generations of Edina residents and attracts visitors from the greater metro area and outstate. The main pool has been modified over the years to meet the needs of our guests. Painting the pool on a regular basis allows us to maintain the asset in the condition our guests have come to expect. Useful Life Project Name Aquatic Center - Main Pool Painting Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$50,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Installation/Maintenance 50,000 50,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 50,000 50,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 32 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Aquatic Center20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description In 2002, the Aquatic Center constructed a body slide and tube slide on one slide tower. In 2018, both slides were restored with new gel coat on the interior and exterior and the faded blue paint on both slides was replaced with bright, bold colors to purposefully extend the life of the slides and modernize the aging facility with a burst of color. Sandblasting, painting and restoring the slide tower structure, including the stairs and handrails, was not part of the 2018 project. We are not aware of any structural deficiencies, however we would hire a structural engineer to evaluate that. The slide tower is 45 feet tall. Over the last 16 years, wear and tear on the steps has caused some of the concrete on the treads to crack and pop off, leaving a rough and uneven surface for bare feet. The paint on the slide tower handrails and spindles is worn off in many places. Restoring the slide tower would finalize the total restoration of this very popular amenity and present the slides in a completely safe and professional manner for years to come. In addition, in 2017, a new play structure was added in the zero-depth pool and it has transformed that area with it's features and bold colors. The new water slide colors also tie into that colors of the play structure and it has created the fun, modern look we hoped to achieve. The slide tower would also compliment those colors, making it look brand new. Project #19-703 Justification In Vision Edina strategic focus area #4, Live and Work it notes that the city is very well endowed with recreation facilities which offer excellent outdoor and sporting amenities. The Aquatic Center has been serving the community for 60 years and has a reputation of a well maintained amenity that consistently serves generations of Edina residents and attracts visitors from the greater metro area and outstate. Restoring the slide tower and stairs would demonstrate our commitment to protecting our assets for the future and ensure we are offering a safe environment for our guests. Since we've just invested more than $80,0000 to restore both of the slides, it makes good business sense to complete the project by restoring the rest of the amenity. Useful Life Project Name Aquatic Center - Slide Tower Restoration Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$137,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 12,00012,000Planning and Design 125,000125,000Installation/Maintenance 137,000 137,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 137,000137,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 137,000 137,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 33 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Tim Olson Description Over the past decade, the use of computers, cell phones and other electronic devises in the commission of crimes has increase exponentially. Today, nearly all criminal activity has an electronic component linked to the crime. To adequately combat these crimes, the police department has expanded its Investigative Division to include a Forensic Detective. The nature of this position requires secure office space, equipped with significant counter-top area necessary for the disassembly of suspect computers, and the storage of hardware and associate gadgetry. The physical structure of the City Hall-Police Department does not afford the space for the creation of a computer forensic office. Today, the Forensic Detective’s work space is divided between three inadequate work areas on two separate floors within the police department. Staff has identified two underutilized adjacent spaces and alcove area within the physical design of Investigative Division. The recommendation is to remodel these areas, creating one functional work space which would house the Forensic Detective and related equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This proposal will: 1) Re-purpose existing space versus creating new space. 2) Include the demolition of building materials that will not be able to be reused once removed. 3) Include new desk/office furnishings that are unique to the equipment used by the Computer Forensic Examiner. This cannot be accomplished with the current inventory of desk materials. Project #19-800 Justification Investigating criminal acts are a primary function of a police department. Proper office space is a necessity for employees to perform their job responsibilities. Forensic examination of computer components and equipment demand a secure and unique work area. The current physical structure of the building does not have a space adequate to accommodate the needs of the forensic office. Temporary accommodations have been set up at multiple locations within the department for the work space needed for this function. This is inefficient, lacks required security and creates questionable oversight related to the position. Staff has determine remodeling of existing space located in the Investigative Division is necessary to meet the requirements placed on the Police Department. Useful Life Project Name Computer Forensic Office Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$56,568 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 30,02430,024Construction 26,54426,544Vehicles and Equipment 56,568 56,568Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 30,02430,024Construction Fund: Available Funding 26,54426,544Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 56,568 56,568Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 34 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Painting of interior process piping, pressure filters, walls and concrete floor sealing 2022 - Exterior doors, roof replacement (asphalt, shingle), painting, gas unit heaters, controls, lighting fixtures, fire alarm system and sprinklers. Project #19-900 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded. Useful Life Project Name Water Treatment Plant 3 Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$321,800 Dept Scoring 28 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 321,80090,000 231,800Installation/Maintenance 90,000 231,800 321,800Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 321,80090,000 231,800Utility Fund: Water 90,000 231,800 321,800Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 35 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the construction of an ammonia feed room within the existing Water Treatment Plant #6. Naturally occurring ammonia levels are low in the water wells supplying WTP #6; ammonia addition would improve water quality and disinfection residuals. We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. We recommend replacing: 2019 Water seal membrane repair 2020 Ammonia room, sealed concrete, water heater, fire alarm, security, emergency light and power. Project #19-901 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. Useful Life Project Name WTP #6 Ammonia Room Addition and Facility Imp.Category Buildings Type New Total Project Cost:$320,000 Dept Scoring 32 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 260,000260,000Construction 60,00060,000Installation/Maintenance 60,000 260,000 320,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 60,00060,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 260,000260,000Utility Fund: Water 60,000 260,000 320,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 36 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Roof hatch 2022 - Lighting Project #19-903 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded. Useful Life Project Name Water Treatment Plant 4 Facility Imp.Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$48,700 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 48,70025,800 22,900Installation/Maintenance 25,800 22,900 48,700Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 48,70025,800 22,900Utility Fund: Water 25,800 22,900 48,700Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 37 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2022 - Lighting, fire alarm system Project #19-904 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded. Useful Life Project Name Water Treatment Plant 2 Facility Imp.Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$63,400 Dept Scoring 24 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 63,40063,400Installation/Maintenance 63,400 63,400Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 63,40063,400Utility Fund: Water 63,400 63,400Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 38 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Kitchen, casework, kitchen equipment,Epoxy flooring, basement ventilation addition, load bank breaker 2021 - Boiler system, controls, fire alarm system, security system, emergency lights, water heater, VCT flooring, carpet 2023 - Sport matting, exterior overhead doors Project #19-922 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded. Useful Life Project Name Fire Station 1 Facility Improvements - Phase I Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$246,600 Dept Scoring 26 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 246,600246,600Installation/Maintenance 246,600 246,600Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 246,600246,600Construction Fund: Available Funding 246,600 246,600Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 39 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Cooler 2020 - Flooring, conveyor belt 2021- Aluminum windows, electrical system 2024 - Fire alarm system, security system Project #19-924 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded. Useful Life Project Name 50th St. Edina Liquor Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$374,126 Dept Scoring 27 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 289,003158,821 50,736 79,446Installation/Maintenance 158,821 50,736 79,446 289,003Total Future 85,123 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 289,003158,821 50,736 79,446Liquor Fund 158,821 50,736 79,446 289,003Total Future 85,123 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 40 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Cooler 2021 - Carpeting,VCT flooring,roof 2022 - Rooftop unit, controls Project #19-925 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded. Useful Life Project Name Grandview Liquor Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$446,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 446,000130,400 205,000 110,600Installation/Maintenance 130,400 205,000 110,600 446,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 446,000130,400 205,000 110,600Liquor Fund 130,400 205,000 110,600 446,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 41 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Cooler 2021 - Roofing Project #19-926 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded. Useful Life Project Name Southdale Liquor Facility Improvement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$410,700 Dept Scoring 24 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 410,700177,200 233,500Installation/Maintenance 177,200 233,500 410,700Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 410,700177,200 233,500Liquor Fund 177,200 233,500 410,700Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 42 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2021 - Replace doors and frames on existing ramp stairwells 2023 - Seal concrete above retail and existing ramp, emergency lights and power. Project #19-947 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Funded. Useful Life Project Name North Parking Ramp Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$247,000 Dept Scoring 22 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 247,00090,000 157,000Construction 90,000 157,000 247,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 247,00090,000 157,000Construction Fund: Special Assessments 90,000 157,000 247,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 43 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. We recommend replacing: 2019 Exterior doors, skylight replacement 2022 Windows, roof drainage system, electrical service and emergency light and power ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The City has adopted the carbon emissions reduction goal of 25 % by 2025. Replacement of the electrical feed and distribution system will cause the building to operate more efficiently, cutting down on our energy consumption. COST CONSIDERATIONS: 4090 (50TH & FRANCE maintenance in working capital fund) or TIF Project #19-948 Justification As outlined in Vision Edina, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure. This is part of our City Work Plan to maintain optimum facility operations. Deferral of maintenance is always more expensive. We used the Building Owners Managers Association(BOMA) 110 ten year old standard to schedule replacements for critical building envelope components. The City has 88 buildings covered in this program with a value of $169,000,000. Types of components include the building foundations, superstructures, mechanicals and electrical systems, plumbing, roofing, flooring, window and door systems. Overall, there are up to 50 total components based on the buildings complexity and design. Useful Life Project Name South Parking Ramp Facility Improvement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,374,795 Dept Scoring 24 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,374,79590,155 1,284,640Construction 90,155 1,284,640 1,374,795Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,374,79590,155 1,284,640Construction Fund: Special Assessments 90,155 1,284,640 1,374,795Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 44 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Equipment and Vehicles 15-003 15,00015,000Assessing Division Equipment Replacement 15-005 1,387,548271,548 254,000 206,000 346,000 310,000Police Squad Cars 15-009 27,00027,000Police Squad Rifles 15-107 4,154,245835,200 844,300 883,010 765,000 826,735PW and Park Maintenance Equipment Replacement 15-108 1,654,000148,000 300,000 247,000 322,000 637,000Utilities Equipment Replacement 15-114 378,000378,000Anti-icing and De-icing Equipment 15-181 81,00028,000 28,000 25,000Engineering Equipment Replacement 15-182 1,422,735566,140 243,800 91,000 249,290 272,505CTS Equipment Replacement 15-226 25,00025,000Election Equipment Replacement 17-049 175,000175,000ARMER Radios (Public Works) 17-154 24,00024,000Floor Scrubber 17-155 22,00022,000Building Inspections Staff Vehicle (2020) 17-158 40,00040,000Utility Pick-up Truck 17-193 110,000110,000Fire Command Staff Vehicles (2021) 19-001 143,000143,000Liquor Store Fixture/furniture Replacements 19-005 25,00025,000EV Infrastructure - Phase I 19-501 35,00035,000Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillator 19-504 50,00030,000 20,000Thermal Imaging Cameras 19-506 37,00037,000Utility Pick-up Vehicle 19-507 28,00028,000Lucas CPR Device 19-509 22,00022,000Building Inspections Staff Vehicle 19-513 175,000175,000Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillators 19-515 37,00037,000Ultrasound Devices 19-516 3,250,0003,250,000Replace fire engine/truck fleet 19-517 1,002,8321,002,832Replace ambulance fleet (4) 19-764 849,32554,000 80,325 93,000 115,000 507,000Parks Equipment Replacement 19-802 200,000200,000Body-Worn Cameras 15,369,6855,643,888 3,408,257 1,630,010 1,914,290 2,773,240Equipment and Vehicles Total GRAND TOTAL 15,369,6855,643,888 3,408,257 1,630,010 1,914,290 2,773,240 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 45 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Community Development20192023thru Contact Bob Wilson Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The assessing division currently has 3 vehicles that are part of the equipment replacement program, each with an estimated useful life of 10 years. The assessing division uses the vehicles to inspect residential property. Two of the vehicles are intended to be replaced in 2015. Two vehicles were purchased in 2005. Based on the current replacement qualification scores, it is anticipated that one Taurus would be replaced in 2018 and the other in 2020. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: A cost analysis will be done in regard to purchasing a hybrid vehicle vs. a standard vehicle. Project #15-003 Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Useful Life 10 years Project Name Assessing Division Equipment Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$30,000 Dept Scoring Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 15,00015,000Vehicles and Equipment 15,000 15,000Total Prior 15,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 15,00015,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 15,000 15,000Total Prior 15,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 46 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Jeff Elasky Description Scheduled replacement of marked, semi-marked and unmarked police service vehicles. 9 Police vehicles will be replaced in 2019. 8 Police vehicles will be replaced in 2020. 7 Police vehicles will be replaced in 2021. 10 Police vehicles will be replaced in 2022. 9 Police vehicles will be replaced in 2023. 3 Police vehicles will be replaced in 2024. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: In 2019 and going forward, the police department will research the viability of going to an electric/gas hybrid type of vehicle for non-patrol duties. Non-patrol vehicles must still blend in with the general public to perform law enforcement tasks, e.g. surveillance- moving and stationary, room for a long gun in the rear portion area and other emergency equipment. The Interceptor utility fuel efficiency is not significantly different from that of the sedan. Taking in to consideration societal and budget impacts, the utility provides the best value for tasks it needs to perform. The police department is looking at the possibility of using 'anti-idling' equipment in the patrol fleet to try and reduce fuel consumption and carbon footprint. Project #15-005 Justification Police service vehicles are considered basic, necessary equipment needed for law enforcement and public safety functions. Police service vehicles are limited to what the three major vehicle manufacturers produce. Several years ago Edina tested all of the pursuit rated models at the St. Cloud driving course and found that the Utility was the best police vehicle for our needs. The Utility was chosen for the following reasons: -Easier to keep emergency first aid equipment at the proper temperature for correct operation (oxygen and defibrillator). -More room to carry the necessary equipment required to provide emergency services. -Vehicle sits higher for better visibility while driving in city traffic. -Better ergonomics for the patrol officer, reducing workman's compensation claims. -All-wheel drive and higher frame clearance makes it less prone to getting stuck during heavy snow events. -The center console, rear cage area and emergency lights are vehicle specific and we have outfitted our current fleet with Utilities. Changing to another vehicle model will cost thousands of dollars per vehicle. -Ford is discontinuing the police sedan in 2019. Useful Life Project Name Police Squad Cars Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,495,608 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,387,548271,548 254,000 206,000 346,000 310,000Vehicles and Equipment 271,548 254,000 206,000 346,000 310,000 1,387,548Total Future 108,060 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,387,548271,548 254,000 206,000 346,000 310,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 271,548 254,000 206,000 346,000 310,000 1,387,548Total Future 108,060 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 47 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Jeff Elasky Description Replace squad rifles in accordance with expected lifespan. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: We currently use Federal Cartridge duty ammunition. Federal is now producing a greener lead-free product for practice ammunition that we would transition to for our training qualification shoots. Project #15-009 Justification Our current squad rifles were purchased in 2009 and are due for replacement in 2019. We intend to stay with our current AR .223 platform, eliminating the need to retrain while also saving money on ammunition. Useful Life 10 years Project Name Police Squad Rifles Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$27,000 Dept Scoring 20 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 27,00027,000Vehicles and Equipment 27,000 27,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 27,00027,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 27,000 27,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 48 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Brian Olson Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Public Works Department has almost $10 million of equipment covered under this program. Types of equipment include small machinery, passenger vehicles and heavy equipment. Most of this equipment has an estimated useful life of between 10-20 years. We have stretched the lifespan of the equipment to its maximum and expect to see an increase in maintenance costs and most importantly delays caused by unreliable equipment. In 2019-2023 we will see the beginning of our end loader replacements and completion of our entire replacement of our sidewalk snow removal equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: As a fleet operation, we strive to buy the tools we need to get the job done in an efficient manner. The quicker we complete the job, the less miles that we travel on the street thereby reducing the amount of fuel consumed. It should also be noted that there is a federal mandate to comply with new emission reduction standards. Whereas this is significantly raising the cost of our replacement, it is being completed on a national level and will increase fuel efficiency and reduce greenhouse gases. Project #15-107 Justification As outlined in Vision Edina, it is the mission of the City Council is to provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure. Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low but most importantly allows us to keep maintaining our snow removal in an efficient manner. Breakdowns delay performance. We are being fiscally responsible with our fleet as is outlined in our IQS and we cannot perform the functions of a Public Works Department without a reliable fleet. Useful Life Project Name PW and Park Maintenance Equipment Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$5,537,664 Dept Scoring 33 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 4,154,245835,200 844,300 883,010 765,000 826,735Vehicles and Equipment 835,200 844,300 883,010 765,000 826,735 4,154,245Total Prior 1,383,419 Total Future 0 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 4,154,245835,200 844,300 883,010 765,000 826,735Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 835,200 844,300 883,010 765,000 826,735 4,154,245Total Prior 1,383,419 Total Future 0 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 49 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Brian Olson Description This project includes normal replacement of vehicles that are part of the utilities division fleet. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: As a fleet operation, we strive to buy the tools we need to get the job done in an efficient manner. The quicker we complete the job, the less miles that we travel on the street thereby reducing the amount of fuel consumed. It should also be noted that there is a federal mandate to comply with new emission reduction standards. Whereas this is significantly raising the cost of our replacement, it is being completed on a national level and will increase fuel efficiency and reduce greenhouse gases. Project #15-108 Justification As outlined in Vision 20/20, it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued City services. We cannot perform the functions of a Public Works Department without a reliable fleet. Vehicles are replaced on a minimum of a 10 year schedule and vehicles have reached their life expectancy. This includes a fleet vehicles (trucks), a street sweeper in 2018, replacement of a 1989 generator in 2019 and backhoe replacement in 2020. Useful Life Project Name Utilities Equipment Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,654,000 Dept Scoring 33 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,654,000148,000 300,000 247,000 322,000 637,000Vehicles and Equipment 148,000 300,000 247,000 322,000 637,000 1,654,000Total Future 0 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,654,000148,000 300,000 247,000 322,000 637,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 148,000 300,000 247,000 322,000 637,000 1,654,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 50 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Shawn Anderson Description This is a tandem truck with a anti-icing tank, with all the hardware and hydraulics to run this unit. Now the city has a full anti-icing system that can support the entire roadway system in an oncoming snow event. The anti-icing truck is also a plow truck that has to be changed back to snow fighting mode just before the storm hits. This is usually the best time for anti-icing. Which limits greatly our ability to utilize the system we just installed last year. This truck and tank will allow the city to anti-ice right up until the snow starts accumulating on the roadways. Which in turn will help greatly in clearing the roadways after the snow has stopped falling. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This CIP request will help provide effective public services by getting our roadways safer in the winter. Also it is a very economical investment, due to the raising price of salt and the effects of chlorides in our waterways. Any way to provide great service and work on using less of the damaging chlorides in our city is always a plus. Project #15-114 Justification This CIP request will help provide effective public services by getting our roadways safer in the winter. Also it is a very economical investment, due to the raising price of salt and the effects of chlorides in our waterways. Any way to provide great service and work on using less of the damaging chlorides in our city is always a plus. Useful Life Project Name Anti-icing and De-icing Equipment Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$378,000 Dept Scoring 38 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 378,000378,000Vehicles and Equipment 378,000 378,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 228,000228,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 150,000150,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 378,000 378,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 51 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This item includes replacing equipment based on the replacement schedule. The Engineering Department's equipment includes several vehicles, surveying and inspection tools, and computer software. Vehicle replacements in 2019, 2020 and 2024(2). Survey equipment replacements in 2023. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Replacing vehicles 10-15 years old with new vehicles reduces the City's carbon footprint as well as its fuel consumption. Project #15-181 Justification The need is emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "evaluate and employ technological advancements to provide city services" and to "provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities." Most of the vehicles have an estimated useful life of 10 years. Surveying/inspection equipment varies between 7 and 15 years, and software is schedule for every 10 years. Regular updates to equipment keeps maintenance costs low, and promotes better job performance by allowing staff to stay up-to-date with technological advances. Useful Life Project Name Engineering Equipment Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$117,000 Dept Scoring 20 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 81,00028,000 28,000 25,000Vehicles and Equipment 28,000 28,000 25,000 81,000Total Future 36,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 81,00028,000 28,000 25,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 28,000 28,000 25,000 81,000Total Future 36,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 52 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Communications and Technol20192023thru Contact Ryan Browning Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Communications & Technology department has a variety of equipment, including cameras, audio and visual equipment, monitors, multi- function printers, servers, switches and routers. Most of this type of electronic equipment has a useful life of 5 to 10 years. Project #15-182 Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Useful Life Project Name CTS Equipment Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,930,445 Dept Scoring 55 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,422,735566,140 243,800 91,000 249,290 272,505Vehicles and Equipment 566,140 243,800 91,000 249,290 272,505 1,422,735Total Future 507,710 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,422,735566,140 243,800 91,000 249,290 272,505Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 566,140 243,800 91,000 249,290 272,505 1,422,735Total Future 507,710 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 53 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Deb Mangen Description The city uses portable voting stations to conduct its elections. Many of the stations were purchased in the 1980's and have reached the end of their useful life. It is anticipated that purchasing a portion of the voting stations each year for two-three years could replace the worn out stations. Voting stations cost approximately $225 each. The city also owns approximately 150 large informational voting signs. Many of the signs were purchased in the early 1990's and are light weight requiring staff to weight them with sandbags to keep them in place on election day. Each year some signs go missing and are damaged becoming unusable. New signs have an approximate cost of $150 each. Phasing the purchasing of these items over three years would allow us to update all the voting stations and purchase a sturdier sign that would have a longer life cycle. As absentee voting continues to grow we need to invest in additional laptops to accommodate absentee voters and potentially staff more than one location. The City needs to update a ballot cabinet that was designed and built by City staff in 1998. The cabinet allows for secure storage of blank absentee ballots in compliance with election laws. This cabinet has reached the end of its useful life and is in need of replacement. It must be custom built because it does not exist commercially. Add an electronic locking system to the two spaces used for storage of voted ballots (Council office door and Election Room on 2nd Floor) Project #15-226 Justification Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low. Elections are fundamental to city government. It is important to keep equipment in good working order. Useful Life Project Name Election Equipment Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$25,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 25,00025,000Vehicles and Equipment 25,000 25,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 25,00025,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 25,000 25,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 54 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Aaron White Description Police, Fire, and Public Works departments use the State of Minnesota Allied Radio Matrix for Emergency Response (ARMER) radio system to communicate between departments, with other agencies, and dispatch. This network of radios is an essential tool to perform work functions. Radios are the primary form of communication to dispatch emergency and non-emergency calls for service to responders. This equipment is on our current replacement schedule and has been scheduled in four phases beginning in 2014. This purchase represents the final phase and will replace Public Works radios. The current radios will no longer function on the ARMER system in 2019 and replacement is mandatory. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motorola has a program in place called the Environment, Health & Safety (EHS) management system that sets targets and drives continuous improvement in safety, pollution prevention and resource conservation throughout the design, manufacturing and distribution of products. Initiatives include reduction of printed documentation, reduced packaging, use of environmentally friendly materials, improved battery designs, and battery recycling programs. COST CONSIDERATIONS: This is a Public Works expense with purchasing managed by the police department. Project #17-049 Justification Motorola (radio manufacture) and Hennepin County (radio network operator) support ARMER public safety radios for 10 years after purchase and provide network support up to an additional 5 years after the product has been discontinued. The Public Works radio fleet represents the last of our original radio equipment from 2004 and will become obsolete in 2019. The police department manages purchasing and operations of the radio system. Useful Life Project Name ARMER Radios (Public Works)Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$175,000 Dept Scoring 52 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 175,000175,000Vehicles and Equipment 175,000 175,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 175,000175,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 175,000 175,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 55 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Darrell Todd Description Replace 12 year old walk-behind floor Scrubber for Station 1. The current equipment was purchased in 2008 as a demo unit. Project #17-154 Justification This walk-behind floor scrubber mechanically scrubs floors inside station and apparatus floor. This equipment is used daily to keep the floors clean and clear of slippery fluids such as oils and greases. Keeping the all floor surfaces clean and well maintain extends the life of the floor surface and projects a professional and high quality fire station. Green: Regularly utilizing commercial grade floor scrubber can ensure floors are maintained without the need for harsh chemicals. New technology may provide environmentally friendly advantages through better batteries in equipment and reduced water usage. Useful Life Project Name Floor Scrubber Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$24,000 Dept Scoring 26 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 24,00024,000Vehicles and Equipment 24,000 24,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 24,00024,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 24,000 24,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 56 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Dave Fischer Description Replace staff vehicle according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Inspections division has several passenger vehicles used to get Inspectors to various work sites around the City. These vehicles have an estimated useful life of 10 years. This purchase will replace a 2010 Ford Focus. Project #17-155 Justification Regular replacement of these vehicles because of the high mileage and emergency response activity after 10 year service life is critical to keep maintenance costs low. Green: Since 2015, the Building Division has been replacing its fleet of vehicles with hybrid technology. This approach has already seen a 45% reduction in fuel use since the implementation of strategy. The plan is to continue in this direction and possibly take advantage of emerging electric/hybrid technology. Useful Life Project Name Building Inspections Staff Vehicle (2020)Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$22,000 Dept Scoring 37 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 22,00022,000Vehicles and Equipment 22,000 22,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 22,00022,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 22,000 22,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 57 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Darrell Todd Description Replace utility pickup truck according to the equipment replacement schedule. The utility pickup truck is used in many situations such as, transporting equipment/personnel to and from emergency scenes, transporting equipment/supplies to and from training sites, plowing fire stations during winter and it is used in general day-to-day operations. Project #17-158 Justification This vehicle was purchased in 2008 and was expected to be replaced in 2018 but the service life was extended due to its good condition. Green: Adhering to replacement schedules provides the greatest opportunity to capitalize on the latest technology in fuel and maintenance costs. This approach can have a direct effect on carbon emissions and reduction in our carbon footprint. Useful Life Project Name Utility Pick-up Truck Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$40,000 Dept Scoring 31 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 40,00040,000Vehicles and Equipment 40,000 40,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 40,00040,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 40,000 40,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 58 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Tom Schmitz Description Replace two (2) 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe vehicles according to the equipment replacement schedule and add (1) new vehicle for EMS Chief. These vehicles are utilized by fire command staff for emergency response and day to day activity. Project #17-193 Justification Regular replacement of these vehicles because of the high mileage and emergency response activity after 10 year service life is critical to keep maintenance costs low. Useful Life Project Name Fire Command Staff Vehicles (2021)Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$110,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 110,000110,000Vehicles and Equipment 110,000 110,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 110,000110,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 110,000 110,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 59 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration: Liquor Stores20192023thru Contact Josh Furbish Description This proposal is for the replacement of all liquor store shelving, fixtures and furniture at all 3 locations. The stores have had interior remodels completed in the past five years but the shelving, fixtures and office furniture were not replaced. The current floor fixtures and shelving at all locations are more than 25 years old and very dated. Modernizing the fixtures will provide a needed refresh for all store to provide a more visually appealing customer experience. Display cooler units in all stores are also over 20 years old. Replacing the display coolers with high efficiency units that reduce our OpEx impact is our goal. The office areas have old and damaged chairs and desks and have not been replaced in over 15 years. Our goal is to replace with ergonomic work stations that provide a comfortable work environment that will allow for increased productivity and meet all safe work place standards. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Reducing energy consumption by replacing display coolers units with high efficiency units. Project #19-001 Justification This project will allow our customers to have a more comfortable, modern and visually appealing customer experience that aligns with the City of Edina's IQS Values. This is also an investment into the wellness of our staff to provide them with comfortable work spaces that will increase productivity. The display cooler units are not only out dated but continue to require routine maintenance that is not cost effective. Replacing and upgrading the units will reduce OpEx costs as well as energy consumption. Useful Life Project Name Liquor Store Fixture/furniture Replacements Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$143,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 143,000143,000Vehicles and Equipment 143,000 143,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 143,000143,000Liquor Fund 143,000 143,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 60 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Tara Brown Description Phase I represents the first year. Other funding sources may be available for out years. Electrification of vehicles is happening at a fast pace as costs lower and mileage range continues to grow. Electric vehicles provide a way for residents and fleet owners to lower their GHG emissions and better air quality with zero tailpipe emissions. One of the top hurdles to EV adoption is the lack of charging infrastructure to 'fuel' up the vehicle. To support EV adoption, public, private, and residential owners will need to make investments in EV infrastructure throughout the city. There are currently four public locations for charging and all are in the greater Southdale area owned by Metrotransit and varied commerical businesses. Our first City owned public charging station will be in the 50th and France North Parking Ramp in fall of 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Electrification of vehicles is one of the top actions to reduce GHG emissions from transportation and better air quality as EVs have no tailpipe emissions. This will increase electricity use, but will have a smaller GHG emissions compared to gasoline or diesel fuel. Depending on placement, can also support our City Fleet transition to electric vehicles. COST CONSIDERATIONS: To manage load and report usage, an annual network fee is needed. Most vendors charge $500 annually for dual port charging station. Project #19-005 Justification Vision Edina states, "Edina community is focused and invested in world-class citywide resource management systems, built around the leading principles of environmental sustainability." Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan's top environmental goal is to reduce GHG emissions 30% by 2025 and 80% by 2050. To do this, transportation, the second largest GHG emitting industry, will need to transition to technologies with a lower emissions and carbon footprint. Building an infrastructure to support this is critical. The City operations will need to invest in this infrastructure for its own fleet and for the public. This action will fulfill the Comprehensive Plan's direction to that City Operations should play a leadership role in emissions reduction. Useful Life Project Name EV Infrastructure - Phase I Category Equipment and Vehicles Type New Total Project Cost:$25,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 25,00025,000Vehicles and Equipment 25,000 25,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 25,00025,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 25,000 25,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 61 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Jeff Siems Description Purchase additional Zoll X-Series Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillator for fourth ambulance. Project #19-501 Justification In 2018, the Fire Division placed into service a fourth ambulance. The primary reason for this is increasing run volume. The only equipment item remaining in completing its full in-service capability is purchasing the monitor. Our current practice is to take the monitor off the engine when the call comes in which affect response times and leaves the engine without a monitor. This is assuming the engine is in the station at the time of the call. This creates a very inefficient process. The State EMS Regulatory Board requires all Advanced Life Support (ALS) ambulance to carry a cardiac monitor/defibrillator. Not having this piece of equipment dedicated to the ambulance can affect our ability to response in an ALS capacity. Useful Life Project Name Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillator Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$35,000 Dept Scoring 47 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 35,00035,000Vehicles and Equipment 35,000 35,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 35,00035,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 35,000 35,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 62 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Jeff Siems Description Replace Thermal Imaging Cameras. These cameras assist fire suppression personnel during fire operations, hazardous materials and special operation incidents. The cameras allow personnel to identify fire and other heat sources which facilitate search and rescue operations. Project #19-504 Justification Regular replacement of these cameras help ensure that the latest technology is available to our emergency responders. Useful Life Project Name Thermal Imaging Cameras Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$50,000 Dept Scoring 36 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00030,000 20,000Vehicles and Equipment 30,000 20,000 50,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00030,000 20,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 30,000 20,000 50,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 63 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Jeff Siems Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT: Replace utility pickup truck according to the equipment replacement schedule. The utility pickup truck is used in many situations such as, transporting equipment/personnel to and from emergency scenes, transporting equipment/supplies to and from training sites, plowing fire stations during winter and it is used in general day-to-day operations. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Adhering to replacement schedules provides the greatest opportunity to capitalize on the latest technology in fuel and maintenance costs. This approach can have a direct effect on carbon emissions and reduction in our carbon footprint. We will evaluate the feasibility of moving towards electric/hybrid vehicles. This will significantly reduce fuel consumption and reduce our carbon footprint. Project #19-506 Justification This vehicle was purchased in 2012 and was expected to be replaced in 2022. Regular replacement of this vehicle and its emergency response activity after 10 year service life is critical to keep maintenance costs low and capitalize on fuel efficient technology. Useful Life Project Name Utility Pick-up Vehicle Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$37,000 Dept Scoring 31 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 37,00037,000Vehicles and Equipment 37,000 37,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 37,00037,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 37,000 37,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 64 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Jeff Siems Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT: Replace two (2) 2012 automatic chest compression devices. Project #19-507 Justification These devices are critical tools used during cardiac arrest to provide automatic mechanical chest compressions for patients without a pulse. Clinical findings and best practices have demonstrated that these devices can have a significant affect on survivability and patient outcomes. Useful Life Project Name Lucas CPR Device Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$28,000 Dept Scoring 37 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 28,00028,000Vehicles and Equipment 28,000 28,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 28,00028,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 28,000 28,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 65 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Dave Fischer Description EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT: Replace staff vehicle according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Inspections division has several passenger vehicles used to get Inspectors to various work sites around the City. These vehicles have an estimated useful life of 10 years. This purchase will replace a 2013 Ford Focus. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Since 2015, the Building Division has been replacing its fleet of vehicles with hybrid technology. This approach has already seen a 45% reduction in fuel use since the implementation of strategy. The plan is to continue in this direction and possibly take advantage of emerging electric/hybrid technology. Project #19-509 Justification Regular replacement of these vehicles because of the high mileage activity after 10 year service life is critical to keep maintenance costs low. Useful Life Project Name Building Inspections Staff Vehicle Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$22,000 Dept Scoring 34 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 22,00022,000Vehicles and Equipment 22,000 22,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 22,00022,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 22,000 22,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 66 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Jeff Siems Description Replace five Zoll X-Series Cardiac Monitors/Defibrillators according to the equipment replacement schedule. Equipment was purchased in 2016 and is extensively utilized during medical emergency responses. The units provide many diagnostic information such as 12-lead ECG's, oximetry, capnography. Replacement of this equipment will bring our capabilities up to the new technology and enhancements in patient assessment, monitoring, defibrillation, cardiac pacing and wireless documentation. Project #19-513 Justification Adhering to replacement schedule ensures that enhancement in lighter weight units, better battery life, advances in patient assessment capabilities, advances in treatment modalities and ability to integrate data from the monitor directly into electronic patient care reports. Useful Life Project Name Cardiac Monitor/Defibrillators Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$175,000 Dept Scoring 42 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 175,000175,000Vehicles and Equipment 175,000 175,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 175,000175,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 175,000 175,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 67 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Jeff Siems Description Replace three existing ultrasound devices and add one additional because of fourth ambulance has been put in service. Ultrasound imaging uses sound waves to produce pictures of the inside of the body. These devices are used by paramedics during patient assessment to help them diagnose and determine extent of injury or critical medical conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: No direct environmental benefit other then providing our paramedics with another assessment tool that will assist them in making better patient/hospital transport decisions. Project #19-515 Justification Current devices were carry-overs from the departments participation in a 2007 research study. Our current devices are very old and the manufacturer no longer supports our devices. There have been significant advances in the technology and design of the devices. The scope of assessment techniques have expanded per our medical director. Useful Life Project Name Ultrasound Devices Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$37,000 Dept Scoring 44 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 37,00037,000Vehicles and Equipment 37,000 37,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 37,00037,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 37,000 37,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 68 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Tom Schmitz Description This project changes the strategy for replacement of the fire engine/truck fleet. Historically, fire engine/trucks have been individually replaced based upon a 20 year life. For example, the aerial truck purchased in 2001 would be scheduled for replacement in 2021, but all engines/trucks are currently on a different cycle. This project would trade in the existing fleet, purchase a new fleet, and set the schedule to replace the fleet every 10 years. Shortening the ownership life will provide significant savings in repair and maintenance costs as well as fuel costs. Additionally, the trade value of the vehicles will be significantly higher than our traditional 20 year old approach. More importantly, this will have a significant affect on operational efficiencies and effectiveness. Fire crews will greatly reduce training time because they will only have to focus on one engine type and one aerial type. Many similarity will exist between these vehicle types because they will come from the same manufacturer and will have many of the same features. Costs include equipment - fire hose, ground ladders, hydraulic extrication tools, power saws and assorted small tools (approximately $120k/vehicle). ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Green alternatives are available and would be reflected in the price. Options include Idle Reduction System, Zero RPM Mitigation System or Green Star System depending upon the vendor. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS: Leasing options will be considered and compared to purchasing. Additional reductions in overall purchase price may be realized through manufacturer discounts associated with chassis prepayments, engineering discounts and other dealership discounts. Annual maintenance and fuel costs should decrease. Project #19-516 Justification Current practice of replacing fire engines and the aerial truck every 20 plus years does not serve the department nor the citizens in the most effective and efficient way. Some of the primary reasons for the change is to enhance the resale value of the equipment at the end of their service life; eliminate rising maintenance cost after 10 years; capitalize on recent industry standards and best practices on a more frequent bases; take advantage of emerging technology to improve fuel and operational efficiency; reduce training time to maintain proficiency; improve operational efficiencies and reduce operational risk. Useful Life Project Name Replace fire engine/truck fleet Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$3,250,000 Dept Scoring 48 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 3,250,0003,250,000Vehicles and Equipment 3,250,000 3,250,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 3,250,0003,250,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 3,250,000 3,250,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 69 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Tom Schmitz Description This project changes the strategy for replacement of ambulances. Historically, ambulances have been individually replaced based upon a 6-8 year life. Our current fleet purchased between 2010 and 2017 is scheduled for replacement between 2018 and 2025. This project would trade in the existing fleet, purchase a new fleet, and set the schedule to replace the fleet every 5 years. Shortening the ownership life will provide significant savings in repair and maintenance costs as well as fuel costs. Trade-in value is estimated at $153,000. Costs include equipment - patient movement equipment (stretcher, powerlift, powerload, stairchair) for approximately $45k/vehicle. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Opportunities do exist within the ambulance industry to capitalize on greener alternatives. This will be considered during the preparation of the specifications. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS: Leasing options will be considered and compared to purchasing. Additional reductions in overall purchase price may be realized through manufacturer discounts associated with chassis prepayments, engineering discounts and other dealership discounts. Annual maintenance and fuel costs should decrease. Project #19-517 Justification Some of the primary reasons for the change are to enhance the resale value of the equipment at the end of their service life; eliminate rising maintenance cost after 5 years; capitalize on recent industry standards and best practices on a more frequent bases; take advantage of emerging technology to improve fuel and operational efficiency; reduce training time to maintain proficiency; improve operational efficiencies and reduce operational risk. Useful Life Project Name Replace ambulance fleet (4)Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,002,832 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,002,8321,002,832Vehicles and Equipment 1,002,832 1,002,832Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,002,8321,002,832Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 1,002,832 1,002,832Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 70 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description Replace equipment according to the equipment replacement schedule. The Parks Maintenance Department has almost $2 million of equipment covered under this program. Types of equipment include small machinery, mowers, passenger vehicles and heavy equipment. Most of this equipment has an estimated useful life of between 10-20 years. We have stretched the lifespan of the equipment to its maximum and expect to see an increase in maintenance costs and most importantly delays caused by unreliable equipment. Formerly combined with Public Works under project #15-107: PW and Park Maintenance Equipment Replacement. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: In Park Maintenance, we strive to buy the tools we need to get the job done in an efficient manner. The quicker we complete the job, the less fuel we consume. As we replace equipment we purchase vehicles that have better fuel economy as new federal emission standards are implemented. This increases fuel efficiency and reduces greenhouse gases. Project #19-764 Justification As outlined in Vision Edina, it is the mission of the City Council is to provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure. Regular updates to equipment helps to keep maintenance costs low but most importantly allows us to keep maintaining our parks to high standards. Breakdowns delay performance. We are being fiscally responsible with our fleet as is outlined in our IQS and we cannot perform the functions of the Park Maintenance division without a reliable fleet. Useful Life Project Name Parks Equipment Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$849,325 Dept Scoring 53 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 849,32554,000 80,325 93,000 115,000 507,000Vehicles and Equipment 54,000 80,325 93,000 115,000 507,000 849,325Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 849,32554,000 80,325 93,000 115,000 507,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 54,000 80,325 93,000 115,000 507,000 849,325Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 71 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dan Conboy Description Purchase of forty-three body-worn cameras for police officers to wear during their performance of duties when interacting with the public. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: - Video recordings will be stored on virtual servers which will have a lower energy footprint. - Constant charging of camera batteries will create an energy pull. - It is unknown at this time if there will be a buy back program. Project #19-802 Justification Body-worn cameras can help improve the high-quality public service expected of police officers and promote the perceived legitimacy and sense of procedural justice that communities have about their police departments. Body-worn cameras can increase accountability for police and citizens and can create a public record that allows the entire community to see what really happened during a specific incident. Body-worn cameras can help identify areas of training and help provide indisputable accounts of incidents. Useful Life Project Name Body-Worn Cameras Category Equipment and Vehicles Type New Total Project Cost:$200,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 200,000200,000Vehicles and Equipment 200,000 200,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 200,000200,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 200,000 200,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 72 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Infrastructure 15-104 120,000120,000Well #16 Rehab 15-140 4,033,9184,033,918Chowen Park A Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15-141 2,525,6222,525,622Chowen Park B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction 15-147 1,000,0001,000,000Sanitary Trunk Capacity Expansion 15-150 1,025,0001,025,000Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation 15-162 15,000,0007,750,000 7,250,000New Water Treatment Plant 5 - Southdale 15-164 700,00050,000 650,000Well 21 and Raw Water Line 15-189 215,00015,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000Gateway Signs 17-006 140,000140,000Centennial Lakes Pathway Replacement 17-011 580,000580,000W 69th Street Eastbound Left Turn Lane 17-012 750,000750,000Vernon Avenue Intersection Improvements 17-014 451,000451,000Arcadia Avenue Improvements 17-018 50,00050,000Valley View Rd Bicycle Facility Improvements 17-020 3,959,0943,959,094Blake Road Reconstruction 17-024 1,007,2021,007,202Grandview A Reconstruction 17-026 4,455,4204,455,420Melody Lake A Reconstruction 17-063 2,943,3492,943,349Indian Trails B/C Reconstruction 17-064 320,708320,708Todd Park E Reconstruction 17-067 4,421,2994,421,299Morningside D/E Reconstruction 17-070 779,000303,400 475,600Valley View Road Sidewalk 17-072 86,40086,400Highway 169 Frontage Road Sidewalk 17-078 1,200,0001,200,000Lake Edina and South Cornelia Trunk Sewer Rehab 17-080 2,050,000500,000 50,000 700,000 800,000Watermain Rehabilitation 17-081 3,127,4102,992,410 45,000 35,000 30,000 25,000Arden Park Restoration Project & Shelter Building 17-082 75,00075,000Sunnyslope Road Shoreline Stabilization 17-083 605,00085,000 110,000 110,000 150,000 150,000Pond and Outlet Maintenance Projects 17-104 150,000150,000Well #8 Rehab 17-106 120,000120,000Well #12 Rehab 17-107 120,000120,000Well #19 Rehab 19-300 525,000525,000Bridge - Benton Avenue Over CP Rail 19-301 1,050,0001,050,000Bridge - Wooddale Ave Bridge Historic Rehab 19-302 400,000400,000Bridge - Centennial Lakes Bridge Railings 19-303 525,000525,000Bridge - Valley View Over CP Rail 19-305 325,000325,000Wooddale Ave and Valley View Rd Traffic Signal 19-306 4,469,4574,469,457West 58th Street Reconstruction 19-308 4,178,9474,178,947Prospect Knolls C Reconstruction 19-309 959,041959,041Prospect Knolls D Reconstruction 19-310 3,161,2063,161,206Presidents B Reconstruction 19-311 5,335,5785,335,578Morningside C Reconstruction 19-314 2,145,0672,145,067Indian Trails A Reconstruction 19-315 379,141379,141Indian Hills C Reconstruction 19-317 5,607,2055,607,205Prospect Knolls A Reconstruction 19-318 1,167,0471,167,047Morningside E Reconstruction 19-319 4,280,0964,280,096Melody Lake B Reconstruction 19-320 2,472,4142,472,414Birchcrest C Reconstruction 19-321 2,592,4962,592,496Creek Knoll A Reconstruction 19-322 1,010,7131,010,713Creek Knoll B Reconstruction Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 73 Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # 19-323 115,000115,000Hillary Lane Shared Use Path 19-324 35,00035,000Tracy Avenue Shared Use Path 19-325 70,00070,000W 77th Street Sidewalk 19-326 50,00050,000Valley View Road Buffered Bike Lanes 19-327 215,260215,260Gleason Road (South) Shared Use Path 19-328 292,300292,300Cornelia Elementary School Sidewalks 19-329 113,800113,800Valley Lane/Ridgeview Drive Bike Lanes 19-330 308,100308,100Gleason Road (North) Shared Use Path 19-331 91,20091,200Eden Avenue Shared Use Path 19-332 224,300224,300Dewey Hill Road Shared Use Path 19-333 409,200409,200McCauley Trail Shared Use Path 19-334 533,500533,500Olinger Boulevard Sidewalk 19-335 2,500,0002,500,000Sanitary Trunk Capacity Expansion York Segs 2-3 19-336 3,000,0003,000,000Sanitary Trunk Capacity Exp York Seg 4 & Fairview 19-337 275,00025,000 250,000Sanitary Trunk Capacity Exp Grandview Lift Station 19-338 900,000900,000Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation 19-339 550,000550,000Lift Station 3 Rehabilitation 19-340 200,00070,000 130,000Sanitary Targeted Inflow Reduction Project 19-341 4,250,000250,000 2,500,000 1,500,000Flood Protect Strat & Morningside Weber Flood Proj 19-342 850,000250,000 600,000Clean Wtr Strat & Lake Cornelia Clean Water Proj 19-345 40,00040,000SWPPP Major Amendment and Model Update 19-346 167,000167,000CWRMP Major Amendment and Model Update 19-347 525,000275,000 30,000 120,000 50,000 50,000Stormwater Best Management Practices Maintenance 19-348 318,000318,000Grandview Area Watermain Improvements PH 1 19-349 240,000240,000Grandview Area Watermain Improvements PH 2 19-351 655,000120,000 125,000 130,000 140,000 140,000Water Main Condition Assessment 19-908 800,000800,000Recondition Coating System, Community Center Tower 19-909 70,00070,000Tower and Reservoir Mixers 19-910 150,000150,000Well #2 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement 19-913 120,000120,000Well #7 Rehabilitation 19-914 420,000420,000Well #10 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement 19-915 420,000420,000Well #11 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvements 19-916 166,000166,000Well #13 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement 19-917 166,000166,000Well #17 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement 19-918 120,000120,000Well #20 Rehabilitation 111,953,49027,344,948 28,555,144 17,403,119 20,478,928 18,171,351Infrastructure Total GRAND TOTAL 111,953,49027,344,948 28,555,144 17,403,119 20,478,928 18,171,351 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 74 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Summary20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description All City streets will be subject to major rehabilitation at some time during their lifespan. When the condition of the pavement precludes standard maintenance procedures (such as seal coating, patching or overlay), complete reconstruction becomes the most cost-effective solution. Street reconstruction typically involves complete replacement of the roadway section, repair/installation of concrete curb and gutter, and repairs to the underground public utilities. It may also include: - Narrowing of streets per the City's Living Streets Policy - Installation of new pedestrian and bicycle facilities per the Comprehensive Plan - Improvements to the storm sewer system per the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan Streets are organized into maintenance groups based on neighborhood, size and approximate age of original construction. There groups are then prioritized for reconstruction based on several factors, including: - Average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) - Condition of underground public utilities (water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer) - Condition of concrete curb and gutter This summary includes the following fully funded projects by year: 2019 - 15-140, 15-141, 17-063, 19-315 2020 - 17-024, 17-026, 19-306, 19-317 2021 - 19-319, 19-320, 19-321, 19-322 2022 - 17-020, 17-067, 19-308, 19-309, 19-318 2023 - 19-310, 19-311, 19-314 2024 - 19-307, 19-312, 19-313 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops Roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Proactive pavement maintenance (including seal coats and mill and overlays) can extend The life of the pavements from 20-30 years to approximately 50-60 years. Maintenance Should be performed in years 7, 23, 41, and 60. Project #St.Recon Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. Useful Life Project Name Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$74,126,879 Dept Scoring Summary Status Active Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 75 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Summary20192023thru Contact Chad Millner The implementation of these projects support the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 61,104,3129,882,030 15,539,284 10,355,719 10,726,334 14,600,945Construction 9,882,030 15,539,284 10,355,719 10,726,334 14,600,945 61,104,312Total Future 13,022,567 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 3,802,9602,010,960 1,792,000Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 21,904,6983,960,658 4,879,038 4,102,516 4,691,679 4,270,807Construction Fund: Special Assessments 761,04762,310 183,088 136,090 294,124 85,435PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 6,997,8391,185,265 1,690,021 1,270,884 1,571,943 1,279,726Utility Fund: Sewer 12,863,4772,147,596 3,268,685 2,135,431 3,080,442 2,231,323Utility Fund: Storm 14,774,2912,526,201 3,507,492 2,710,798 3,255,240 2,774,560Utility Fund: Water 9,882,030 15,539,284 10,355,719 14,685,428 10,641,851 61,104,312Total Future 13,022,567 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 76 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Summary20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description The City’s pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure will be improved according to the City’s Comprehensive Plan and its approved Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. Upgrading existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities as well as installing new non-motorized infrastructure will almost exclusively take place within the roadway right-of-way. Whenever possible new and improved sidewalks, shared-use paths and other bicycle facilities will be constructed along with other projects and roadway maintenance improvements to minimize cost and construction impacts. In addition, priority for PACS Funded-projects will be given to those that align with the “Twin Loops” network of “all ages and abilities” facilities as defined in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. This is the summary level for bike lanes, sidewalks and shared use paths. The summary includes the following projects and their related costs: 17-018 - Valley View Rd Bicycle Facility Improvements 17-070 - Valley View Road Sidewalk 17-072 - Highway 169 Frontage Road Sidewalk 19-323 - Hillary Lane Shared Use Path 19-324 - Tracy Avenue Shared Use Path 19-325 - W 77th Street Sidewalk 19-326 - Valley View Road Buffered Bike Lanes 19-327 - Gleason Road (South) Shared Use Path 19-328 - Cornelia Elementary School Sidewalks 19-329 - Valley Lane/Ridgeview Drive Bike Lanes 19-330 - Gleason Road (North) Shared Use Path 19-331 - Eden Avenue Shared Use Path 19-332 - Dewey Hill Road Shared Use Path 19-333 - McCauley Trail Shared Use Path 19-334 - Olinger Boulevard Sidewalk ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks, trails, bicycle facilities and pedestrian crossings support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduced carbon footprint and lower greenhouse gas emissions and improved air quality. Project #Ped&Bike Imp Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are: Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and Plan strive to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Useful Life Project Name Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$3,723,060 Dept Scoring Summary Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 3,373,060609,800 740,860 805,400 633,500 583,500Construction 609,800 740,860 805,400 633,500 583,500 3,373,060Total Future 350,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 77 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Summary20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000HRA Fund: Centennial Lakes TIF 2,637,860564,800 619,160 589,600 330,800 533,500PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 685,20045,000 121,700 215,800 302,700Utility Fund: Storm 609,800 740,860 805,400 633,500 583,500 3,373,060Total Future 350,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 78 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description Rehabilitation of Well #16 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor and other worn equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #15-104 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 15 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its seasonal municipal water wells. Year around wells every 5-7 years. Well #16 was last rehabbed in 2004. Useful Life Project Name Well #16 Rehab Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$120,000 Dept Scoring 26 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Construction 120,000 120,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 120,000120,000Utility Fund: Water 120,000 120,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 79 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Abbott Avenue, Beard Avenue, W 59th Street, York Avenue, and Zenith Avenue) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #15-140 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Chowen Park A Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$4,033,918 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 4,033,9184,033,918Construction 4,033,918 4,033,918Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,566,1131,566,113Construction Fund: Special Assessments 62,31062,310PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 522,080522,080Utility Fund: Sewer 808,116808,116Utility Fund: Storm 1,075,2991,075,299Utility Fund: Water 4,033,918 4,033,918Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 80 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Chowen Avenue, Drew Avenue, and Ewing Avenue) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. It will also begin to address the storm water issue identified in the STS-406 Storm Water Report from 2014. Project #15-141 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Chowen Park B Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$2,525,622 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 2,525,6222,525,622Construction 2,525,622 2,525,622Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 944,659944,659Construction Fund: Special Assessments 314,912314,912Utility Fund: Sewer 617,445617,445Utility Fund: Storm 648,606648,606Utility Fund: Water 2,525,622 2,525,622Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 81 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description The SE part of Edina continues to increase in development density which in turn puts additional pressure on our sanitary sewer system. A model with various development densities was created to determine which parts of the system will be most impacted by development. This project will meet increasing sewer capacity needs at areas of most risk. The 2017 Phase includes improvement of a flow meter and capacity increases near 75th and Xerxes Ave. The 2019 Phase will continue to address the areas of most risk in SE Edina. 2019 Update: This includes the next segment of trunk pipe upstream of the 2017 segment in Yorktown Park and York Avenue north of the Promenade. Future segments will be included in separate CIP requests. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sanitary lift stations use electricity which have an ongoing energy cost. In 2016 this project could produce alternatives that weigh the cost/benefit of options with and without new lift stations. Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. COST CONSIDERATIONS: This project qualifies for potential TIF/HRA funding. If Southdale TIF generates additional revenue, in its closing years, funding could be directed to this project. Project #15-147 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. It may be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Sanitary Trunk Capacity Expansion Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$1,729,315 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 140,000140,000Planning and Design 860,000860,000Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000Total Prior 729,315 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,000,0001,000,000Utility Fund: Sewer 1,000,000 1,000,000Total Prior 729,315 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 82 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project will repair manholes and line sanitary trunk sewer on the oldest trunk sewer line in Edina, along Minnehaha Creek. This project is described as project areas 3 and 5 in the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Infiltration Study Report (December 2013). 2019 Update: This project was scheduled for 2018 in the last CIP, but construction is planned to take place in late 2018 into winter/spring of 2019 so schedule of expense was updated. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. Efforts to reduce infiltration and inflow of clean waters reduce future capacity increases both locally and in the regional treatment system. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Reduction of inflow and infiltration reduces metered flow which determines the City share of Met Council regional system expense. Project #15-150 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,100,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Planning and Design 975,000975,000Construction 1,025,000 1,025,000Total Prior 75,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,025,0001,025,000Utility Fund: Sewer 1,025,000 1,025,000Total Prior 75,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 83 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project includes the design of Southdale Water Plant to be located on property previously acquired for this purpose along France Avenue just north of the Southdale water tower. This plant will filter water from wells 5, 18, and potentially future well 21. 2019 Update: Permitting and design began in 2017 with land use approvals and architectural design continuing in 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Project is designed to take into consideration overall operating costs from energy and chemicals. Stormwater features will provide aesthetics, treatment and recharge. Project #15-162 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on need. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name New Water Treatment Plant 5 - Southdale Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$15,910,000 Dept Scoring 22 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 2,000,0001,250,000 750,000Planning and Design 13,000,0006,500,000 6,500,000Construction 7,750,000 7,250,000 15,000,000Total Prior 910,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 15,000,0007,750,000 7,250,000Utility Fund: Water 7,750,000 7,250,000 15,000,000Total Prior 910,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 84 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project includes a design alternative for an additional well supplying the Southdale Water Plant (15-162) 2019 Update: Construction is proposed to be delayed due to cost overrun in the treatment plant project. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Location, construction techniques, and equipment selection will be considered during the design phase of the project. Project #15-164 Justification Comprehensive Plan Chapter 8 Water System Demand and Capacity Analysis (2013) Wellhead Protection Plan (2013) Water Distribution System Analysis (2002) The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on need. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Well 21 and Raw Water Line Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$775,000 Dept Scoring 17 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Planning and Design 650,000650,000Construction 50,000 650,000 700,000Total Prior 75,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 700,00050,000 650,000Utility Fund: Water 50,000 650,000 700,000Total Prior 75,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 85 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Bill Neuendorf Description A gateway sign is often the first impression people have of a city, development, business park or other public place. A well planned and executed gateway sign is important because it gives an immediate sense of a brand and denotes a sense of pride and caring, and makes visitors feel welcome. The City’s Branding Committee and Communications & Technology Services Department recommend the placement of "Welcome to Edina" gateway signs. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Gateway signs need to be lighted to continue communicating the brand 24-hours a day. Solar lights could be considered to reduce electrical load. One entrance sign was installed at the 66th and York Intersection. This project would develop a plan on locations to continue installing gateway signs. Project #15-189 Justification One of the City Leadership Priorities in the 2012 Work Plan was "Improve Communications Tools." One of the objectives toward meeting that goal is to implement branding standards. One of the City Leadership Priorities in the 2014 Work Plan is "Development and renewal of commercial and residential areas is essential to the on- going health of the city." Gateway signs that better reflect the City's brand will contribute to the renewal of those places. Useful Life Project Name Gateway Signs Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$215,000 Dept Scoring 20 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 215,00015,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000Construction 15,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 215,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 215,00015,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000HRA Fund: Centennial Lakes TIF 15,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 215,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 86 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Centennial Lakes Park20192023thru Contact Tom Shirley Description The pathway system around Centennial Lakes consists of a mile and a half long colored concrete walkway, with the exception of one 1800 foot section of asphalt path on the east side of the lake next to the putting course. This asphalt pathway was installed in 1991 when the Park first opened and was intended to be a temporary pathway that would be replaced with concrete as the rest of the park was developed. Due to funding constraints the pathway was never replaced. This asphalt section is now showing its age, with a multitude of cracks, heaves and failures. It has been patched in several areas but is looking tired and worn. We would propose to remove the old asphalt pathway and replace it with a new concrete path of the same seven foot width. Project #17-006 Justification The pathway system at Centennial Lakes Park is one of the most heavily used walkways in Edina. Maintaining this pathway is important to both the aesthetics of the park as well as the safety of the park patrons. Useful Life Project Name Centennial Lakes Pathway Replacement Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$140,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 140,000140,000Construction 140,000 140,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 140,000140,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 140,000 140,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 87 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description The scope of this project is to construct a roundabout on W 69th Street to allow vehicles to turn left into Southdale Center at its westerly entrance from 69th Street. Currently left turns at this location are prohibited. Other related intersection improvements, such as improved geometric design at the entrances to Southdale Center and The Galleria along with pedestrian and bicycle improvements, are also anticipated as part of this project. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize esources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. Project #17-011 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name W 69th Street Eastbound Left Turn Lane Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$580,000 Dept Scoring 15 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 580,000580,000Construction 580,000 580,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 280,000280,000Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 200,000200,000HRA Fund: Centennial Lakes TIF 50,00050,000PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 50,00050,000Utility Fund: Storm 580,000 580,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 88 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Bill Neuendorf Description This project involves adding an additional left turn lane lane and more space for bikes and pedestrians at the Vernon and Interlachen Intersection. This will improve pedestrian crossings and vehicular movement across and through the intersection. Work at this intersection includes thermoplastic pavement markings and pedestrian-activated crossing signals and the installation of ADA compliant pedestrian ramps. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and bicycle facilities support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Project #17-012 Justification As stated in Edina's strategic vision framework, Vision Edina: in the city there is "a strong desire to continue to expand a variety of transportation options to both reduce dependency on automobiles and enhance the community’s work and life balance, and ease of connectivity. Walking, biking, and transit options represent key amenities that help residents feel connected to their community, and improve the overall quality of life." This project follows Vision Edina strategic actions related to expanding the transportation network covering multiple modes of transportation as well as improving accessibility and connectivity throughout the city. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and Plan strive to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Useful Life Project Name Vernon Avenue Intersection Improvements Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$750,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 750,000750,000Construction 750,000 750,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 750,000750,000HRA Fund: Centennial Lakes TIF 750,000 750,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 89 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Bill Neuendorf Description The scope of this project includes the reconstruction of approximately 575 feet of Arcadia Avenue, from Eden Avenue to the north edge of the former public works site property. This reconstruction would occur along with the redevelopment of this site, and would include one through-lane in each direction, on-street bicycle lanes and sidewalks on both sides, and on-street parking if necessary and feasible. Potential design options include a "shared street" concept north of the ramp entrance, which may include shared space for vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians and could be closed for events and festivals. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Sidewalks, pedestrian crossings and bicycle facilities support non-motorized transportation, which can replace vehicular travel, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Project #17-014 Justification As stated in Edina's strategic vision framework, Vision Edina: in the city there is "a strong desire to continue to expand a variety of transportation options to both reduce dependency on automobiles and enhance the community’s work and life balance, and ease of connectivity. Walking, biking, and transit options represent key amenities that help residents feel connected to their community, and improve the overall quality of life." This project follows Vision Edina strategic actions related to expanding the transportation network covering multiple modes of transportation as well as improving accessibility and connectivity throughout the city. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and Plan strive to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Useful Life Project Name Arcadia Avenue Improvements Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$451,000 Dept Scoring 15 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 451,000451,000Construction 451,000 451,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 451,000451,000HRA Fund: Grandview 2 TIF 451,000 451,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 90 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves the extension of existing bicycle facilities on Valley View Road from Brookview Avenue, under the TH 62 bridge, south to W 66th Street. The existing on-street bicycle lanes will transition to off-street, paved facilities north of Brookview Avenue. This off-street facility will continue south to the intersection with W 65th Street/TH 62 off ramp, where it will transition back to on-street, buffered (by pavement markings) bike lanes. These lanes will continue to W 66th Street. The project scope also includes the removal of the "free right" turn from westbound 66th Street to northbound Valley View Road. Pedestrian crossing improvements will also be made throughout the project area. This project can be coordinated with MnDOT's replacement of the Highway 62 Bridge. Project #17-018 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Valley View Rd Bicycle Facility Improvements Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$400,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Construction 50,000 50,000Total Future 350,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000HRA Fund: Centennial Lakes TIF 50,000 50,000Total Future 350,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 91 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction of Municipal State Aid designated Blake Road from Spruce Road to Scriver Road. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. The project will meet current State Aid requirements. Project #17-020 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Blake Road Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$3,959,094 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 3,959,0943,959,094Construction 3,959,094 3,959,094Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,792,0001,792,000Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 448,000448,000Construction Fund: Special Assessments 65,44065,440PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 332,752332,752Utility Fund: Sewer 787,086787,086Utility Fund: Storm 533,816533,816Utility Fund: Water 3,959,094 3,959,094Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 92 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Hansen Road and Windsor Avenue) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #17-024 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Grandview A Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,007,202 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,007,2021,007,202Construction 1,007,202 1,007,202Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 417,691417,691Construction Fund: Special Assessments 111,910111,910Utility Fund: Sewer 220,764220,764Utility Fund: Storm 256,837256,837Utility Fund: Water 1,007,202 1,007,202Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 93 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Bernard Place, Code Avenue, Dale Avenue, Hansen Road, Melody Lake Drive, Melody Lane, West 56th Street, and West 57th Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #17-026 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Melody Lake A Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$4,455,420 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 4,455,4204,455,420Construction 4,455,420 4,455,420Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,756,5721,756,572Construction Fund: Special Assessments 119,698119,698PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 470,630470,630Utility Fund: Sewer 1,028,4091,028,409Utility Fund: Storm 1,080,1111,080,111Utility Fund: Water 4,455,420 4,455,420Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 94 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Bello Drive, Overholt Pass, Paiute Circle, Paiute Pass, Sally Lane, and Shawnee Circle) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #17-063 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Indian Trails B/C Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$2,943,349 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 2,943,3492,943,349Construction 2,943,349 2,943,349Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,293,8991,293,899Construction Fund: Special Assessments 306,480306,480Utility Fund: Sewer 639,590639,590Utility Fund: Storm 703,380703,380Utility Fund: Water 2,943,349 2,943,349Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 95 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Brookside Court, Brookside Terrace, and Motor Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #17-064 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Todd Park E Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$320,708 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 320,708320,708Construction 320,708 320,708Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 112,263112,263Construction Fund: Special Assessments 30,07930,079Utility Fund: Sewer 109,335109,335Utility Fund: Storm 69,03169,031Utility Fund: Water 320,708 320,708Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 96 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Branson Street, Crocker Avenue, Grimes Avenue, Littel Street, Lynn Avenue, Morningside Road, Oakdale Avenue, and West 42nd Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #17-067 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Morningside D/E Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$4,421,299 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 4,421,2994,421,299Construction 4,421,299 4,421,299Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,806,7301,806,730Construction Fund: Special Assessments 64,62864,628PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 484,069484,069Utility Fund: Sewer 954,919954,919Utility Fund: Storm 1,110,9531,110,953Utility Fund: Water 4,421,299 4,421,299Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 97 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction along portions of the south side of Valley View Road from Mark Terrace Drive to Gleason Road. The new sidewalk will connect to existing sidewalks on Valley View Road and Gleason Road and is recommended in the City's Active Routes to School Plan. Project #17-070 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Valley View Road Sidewalk Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$779,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 779,000303,400 475,600Construction 303,400 475,600 779,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 779,000303,400 475,600PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 303,400 475,600 779,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 98 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves bituminous shared-use path construction along the east side of the Highway 169 Frontage Road from Valley View Road to Braemar Boulevard. The new path will connect to existing sidewalk on Valley View Road and to Braemar Arena and Field, and will be part of the "twin loops" pedestrian and bicycle network proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. Project #17-072 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Highway 169 Frontage Road Sidewalk Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$86,400 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 86,40086,400Construction 86,400 86,400Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 86,40086,400PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 86,400 86,400Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 99 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project will repair manholes and line sanitary trunk sewer on one of the deepest trunk sewer lines in Edina, near Lake Edina. This project is described as project areas 8, 9, and 10 in the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Infiltration Study Report (December 2013). This project proposes to investigate, recommend and line segments of pipe and service risers between MH 3479 near Highway 100 and Lift Station 6. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. Efforts to reduce infiltration and inflow of clean waters reduce future capital and infrastructure need both locally and in the regional treatment system. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Reduction of inflow and infiltration reduces metered flow which determines the City share of Met Council regional system expense. Project #17-078 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” This project follows the mission statement by providing effective and values public services and maintaining a sound public infrastructure to sustain and improve the high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Useful Life Project Name Lake Edina and South Cornelia Trunk Sewer Rehab Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,200,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 180,000180,000Planning and Design 1,020,0001,020,000Construction 1,200,000 1,200,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,200,0001,200,000Utility Fund: Sewer 1,200,000 1,200,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 100 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project will replace, repair and rehabilitate watermain, gate valves,hydrants or service lines in areas that experience high reported breaks or component failure or are found to be near the end of their expected lifespan though maintenance records and nondestructive testing. One project area meeting this criteria for a standalone water main rehabilitation is the Normandale Park C neighborhood. The project includes the 2,400 lineal feet water main loop of Whiting Ave, Holborn Ave and W 64th St scheduled for 2020. Other project areas are yet to be determined and will include professional services to scope need in areas that are suspected of being most at risk. In 2015 the rate of infrastructure replacement for water assets was less than 0.6% and we expect replacement need to be higher in the near future. As nondestructive testing is performed for the neighborhood street reconstruction program, additional water main needs will be assessed in nearby neighborhoods that have similar water main age cohorts and expected need. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. Efforts to reduce water leaks reduce pumping costs and associated energy use, and reduce future capital and infrastructure need both locally and in the regional production system. Project #17-080 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Watermain Rehabilitation Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$2,050,000 Dept Scoring 20 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 250,00050,000 100,000 100,000Planning and Design 1,800,000500,000 600,000 700,000Construction 500,000 50,000 700,000 800,000 2,050,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 2,050,000500,000 50,000 700,000 800,000Utility Fund: Water 500,000 50,000 700,000 800,000 2,050,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 101 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description Partnership project with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to improve stream health, stormwater treatment and park facilities including a trails, a new shelter building and playground structure. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The project includes a formal EAW for environmental review. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Costs for managing vegetated areas during establishment included for 4 years following project. Project #17-081 Justification Vision Edina identifies Environmental Stewardship as a key issue and notes that participants in the process were, "more supportive of environmentally responsible policies and practices than any other issue area." The 2008 Comprehensive Plan references the water quality management goals of the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan which includes managing city water resources so that the beneficial uses of streams, wetlands, ponds, and lakes remain available to the community. The City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District entered into a Memorandum of Understanding in 2014 identifying areas of collaboration within the realms of land use planning, transportation, stormwater management, economic development, flood mitigation, parks and public land management, greenway development and water resource improvements. Useful Life Project Name Arden Park Restoration Project & Shelter Building Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$3,347,410 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 800,000800,000Planning and Design 2,192,4102,192,410Construction 135,00045,000 35,000 30,000 25,000Installation/Maintenance 2,992,410 45,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 3,127,410Total Prior 220,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,070,6001,070,600Construction Fund: Available Funding 930,300930,300Construction Fund: Park Dedication 358,700358,700PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 767,810632,810 45,000 35,000 30,000 25,000Utility Fund: Storm 2,992,410 45,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 3,127,410Total Prior 220,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 102 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description The project location is the shoreline of Mill Pond along E Sunnyslope Road. Shoreline stabilization is necessary to protect from further erosion. The project would include construction, permitting, and an engineered design sufficient to meet Minnehaha Creek Watershed District rules. Project #17-082 Justification Vision Edina identifies Environmental Stewardship as a key issue and notes that participants in the process were, "more supportive of environmentally responsible policies and practices than any other issue area." The 2008 Comprehensive Plan references the water quality management goals of the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan which includes managing city water resources so that the beneficial uses of streams, wetlands, ponds, and lakes remain available to the community. This project could serve as a demonstration of a stabilized shoreline to educate the community on water quality practices that they could adopt on their own property. Heightening community awareness of water quality management through education is an action item in our Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Useful Life Project Name Sunnyslope Road Shoreline Stabilization Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$75,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 75,00075,000Construction 75,000 75,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 75,00075,000Utility Fund: Storm 75,000 75,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 103 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project includes 1) needed repairs to existing storm sewer infrastructure, 2) a stormwater pond assessment and maintenance schedule, and 3) pond dredging for the purpose of maintaining the stormwater network which contains more than 7,000 manholes, catchbasin, inlets, and outlets, and more than 250 waterbodies that receive stormwater. Regular inspection and maintenance of existing infrastructure can be more cost-effective for removing pollutants than implementing new practices. It is also required under the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit. By the end of this 5-year permit term (issued in August 2013), every piece of the system will have been inspected. The list of needed repairs and maintenance will continue to grow as infrastructure ages and the City implements more practices to manage stormwater pollution. Many ponds throughout the city intercept stormwater, providing stormwater pollution treatment. Over time, these basins fill in with sediment and other pollutants and require removal of material to remain effective. The number of stormwater ponds that are coming due or overdue for maintenance is currently unknown. This project would include an assessment of the City's stormwater ponds to establish a long-term maintenance schedule for dredging projects. This project would also include performing maintenance on ponds, per the schedule. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: Maintenance implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. These projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: Pond and outlet maintenance provides drainage and flood protection services and locations where sediment is captured instead of the lakes and streams. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Infrastructure repairs/maintenance and pond dredging will be an ongoing cost; however, maintaining the present system will be more cost effective for reaching pollutant reduction goals than building new best management practices. Project #17-083 Justification Regular inspection and maintenance of the storm sewer system infrastructure is required as part of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The 2011 Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan identifies multiple pond improvement projects to benefit water quality. Edina has multiple waterbodies on the Federal 303(d) List of Impaired Waters that are not meeting water quality standards including Lake Edina, Lake Cornelia, Nine Mile Creek, and Minnehaha Creek. Useful Life Project Name Pond and Outlet Maintenance Projects Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$605,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 10,00010,000Planning and Design 595,00075,000 110,000 110,000 150,000 150,000Installation/Maintenance 85,000 110,000 110,000 150,000 150,000 605,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 605,00085,000 110,000 110,000 300,000Utility Fund: Storm 85,000 110,000 110,000 300,000 605,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 104 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 8 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment and further developing the well hole itself. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #17-104 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 15 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its seasonal municipal water wells. Year around wells every 5-7 years. This fits into the work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2005. Useful Life Project Name Well #8 Rehab Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$150,000 Dept Scoring 28 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 150,000150,000Installation/Maintenance 150,000 150,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 150,000150,000Utility Fund: Water 150,000 150,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 105 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 12 by repairing or replacing the well ump, motor, and other worn equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency rives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #17-106 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 15 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its seasonal municipal water wells. Year around wells every 5-7 years. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2013. This is a well that runs year round. Useful Life Project Name Well #12 Rehab Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$120,000 Dept Scoring 28 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Installation/Maintenance 120,000 120,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 120,000120,000Utility Fund: Water 120,000 120,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 106 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 19 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #17-107 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a 15 year rehabilitation schedule for each of its seasonal municipal water wells. Year around wells every 5-7 years. This fits into that work plan as it was last rehabilitated in 2004. This is a well that runs year round. Useful Life Project Name Well #19 Rehab Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$120,000 Dept Scoring 29 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Installation/Maintenance 120,000 120,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 120,000120,000Utility Fund: Water 120,000 120,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 107 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description The Benton Avenue bridge over the CP Rail line is in need of repair. The most recent inspection recommended development of a deck repair plan. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Strategic rehabilitation of the structure extends the life of the asset so that complete replacement is not required prematurely. Proper maintenance is a better use of resources. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Currently $100,000 is available annually for bridge maintenance. This will not be sufficient for significant bridge repairs. Project #19-300 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the structure. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Bridge - Benton Avenue Over CP Rail Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$525,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 525,000525,000Construction 525,000 525,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 450,000450,000Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 25,00025,000Utility Fund: Storm 525,000 525,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 108 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description The Wooddale Avenue Bridge over Minnehaha Creek is a Historic Bridge in need of rehabilitation. Specifically the wing walls and the bridge railings are deteriorating and need replacement. Because of the historic nature of the bridge the state historical society requires in-kind replacement materials and techniques. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: The Pavement Management Program implemented by the City seeks to utilize resources efficiently by performing infrastructure renewal that will provide the greatest lifespan increase for the lowest cost. Compared to new construction projects, our roadway reconstruction projects try to minimize disturbance and/or reuse as much of the existing facilities as possible to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods utilized within the City include reclamation of existing bituminous surfaces to use as aggregate base material, implementation of utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies thus reducing greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. COST CONSIDERATIONS: This bridge is eligible for both state and federal funding for rehabilitation. Currently $100,000 is available annually for bridge maintenance. This will not be sufficient for significant bridge repairs. Project #19-301 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the structure, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Bridge - Wooddale Ave Bridge Historic Rehab Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,050,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,050,0001,050,000Construction 1,050,000 1,050,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 250,000250,000Construction Fund: Grants & Donations 700,000700,000Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 50,00050,000Utility Fund: Storm 1,050,000 1,050,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 109 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description The bridge railings on the Centennial Lakes bridges on 76th Street are in need of repair. The most recent inspection recommended development of a railing replacement plan. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Strategic rehabilitation of the structure extends the life of the asset so that complete replacement is not required prematurely. Proper maintenance is a better use of resources. Project #19-302 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the railings. Useful Life Project Name Bridge - Centennial Lakes Bridge Railings Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$400,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 400,000400,000Construction 400,000 400,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 350,000350,000Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 400,000 400,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 110 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description The Valley View Road bridge over the CP Rail line is in need of repair. The most recent inspection recommended development of a deck repair plan. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Strategic rehabilitation of the structure extends the life of the asset so that complete replacement is not required prematurely. Proper maintenance is a better use of resources. COST CONSIDERATION: Currently $100,000 is available annually for bridge maintenance. This will not be sufficient for significant bridge repairs. Project #19-303 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the structure. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Bridge - Valley View Over CP Rail Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$525,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 525,000525,000Construction 525,000 525,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 250,000250,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 250,000250,000Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 25,00025,000Utility Fund: Storm 525,000 525,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 111 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project will install a new traffic signal at the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road to improve traffic and pedestrian operations. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: Creating ways to effectively move traffic through intersections reduces stopping time and idling engines. This reduces the environmental impact. Surface water: The Living Streets initiative reduces impervious surfaces and develops roads, bicycle and pedestrian facilities with low impact development techniques. Project #19-305 Justification As stated in Edina's strategic vision framework, Vision Edina: in the city there is "a strong desire to continue to expand a variety of transportation options to both reduce dependency on automobiles and enhance the community’s work and life balance, and ease of connectivity. Walking, biking, and transit options represent key amenities that help residents feel connected to their community, and improve the overall quality of life." This project follows Vision Edina strategic actions related to expanding the transportation network covering multiple modes of transportation as well as improving accessibility and connectivity throughout the city. The need is also emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives," and to "promote safe walking, bicycling, and driving." The approved Living Streets Policy and Plan strive to balance the needs of motorists, bicyclists, pedestrians and transit riders in ways that promote safety and convenience, and provide meaningful opportunities for active living and better health. Useful Life Project Name Wooddale Ave and Valley View Rd Traffic Signal Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$325,000 Dept Scoring 22 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 25,00025,000Planning and Design 300,000300,000Construction 325,000 325,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 300,000300,000HRA Fund: 70th & Cahill TIF 25,00025,000PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 325,000 325,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 112 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction of Municipal State Aid designated West 58th Street from Wooddale Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. The project will meet current State Aid requirements. Project #19-306 Justification Refer to Street Reconstruction Overview Useful Life Project Name West 58th Street Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$4,469,457 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 4,469,4574,469,457Construction 4,469,457 4,469,457Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 2,010,9602,010,960Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid 502,740502,740Construction Fund: Special Assessments 40,46940,469PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 373,410373,410Utility Fund: Sewer 883,259883,259Utility Fund: Storm 658,619658,619Utility Fund: Water 4,469,457 4,469,457Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 113 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Lee Valley Circle, Fleetwood Drive, Lanham Lane, Kemrich Drive, Tara Road) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-308 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Prospect Knolls C Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$4,178,947 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 4,178,9474,178,947Construction 4,178,947 4,178,947Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,561,8851,561,885Construction Fund: Special Assessments 148,061148,061PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 520,670520,670Utility Fund: Sewer 875,935875,935Utility Fund: Storm 1,072,3961,072,396Utility Fund: Water 4,178,947 4,178,947Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 114 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Weston Circle and Village Drive(public only?)) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-309 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Prospect Knolls D Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$959,041 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 959,041959,041Construction 959,041 959,041Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 397,718397,718Construction Fund: Special Assessments 106,559106,559Utility Fund: Sewer 210,208210,208Utility Fund: Storm 244,556244,556Utility Fund: Water 959,041 959,041Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 115 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (2nd Street South, Belmore Lane, Van Buren Avenue, Harrison Avenue, Tyler Avenue, Tyler Court) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-310 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Presidents B Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$3,161,206 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 3,161,2063,161,206Construction 3,161,206 3,161,206Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,310,9651,310,965Construction Fund: Special Assessments 351,241351,241Utility Fund: Sewer 692,891692,891Utility Fund: Storm 806,109806,109Utility Fund: Water 3,161,206 3,161,206Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 116 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Natchez Avenue, Monterey Avenue, Lynn Avenue, Kipling Avenue, Grimes Avenue, Inglewood Avenue, West 40th Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-311 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Morningside C Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$5,335,578 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 5,335,5785,335,578Construction 5,335,578 5,335,578Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 2,070,2742,070,274Construction Fund: Special Assessments 85,43585,435PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 690,147690,147Utility Fund: Sewer 1,068,2641,068,264Utility Fund: Storm 1,421,4581,421,458Utility Fund: Water 5,335,578 5,335,578Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 117 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (West Trail, Samuel Road, Sioux Trail, Sally Lane and Iroquois Circle) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-314 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Indian Trails A Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$2,145,067 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 2,145,0672,145,067Construction 2,145,067 2,145,067Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 889,568889,568Construction Fund: Special Assessments 238,338238,338Utility Fund: Sewer 470,168470,168Utility Fund: Storm 546,993546,993Utility Fund: Water 2,145,067 2,145,067Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 118 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Gleason Terrace and St Albans Circle) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-315 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Indian Hills C Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$379,141 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 379,141379,141Construction 379,141 379,141Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 155,987155,987Construction Fund: Special Assessments 41,79341,793Utility Fund: Sewer 82,44582,445Utility Fund: Storm 98,91698,916Utility Fund: Water 379,141 379,141Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 119 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Dublin Circle, West 70th Street, Dublin Road, Antrim Road, Antrim Terrace, Antrim Court, Kerry Road, Wexford Road, Down Road, Tralee Drive, Lee Valley Road, Shannon Drive) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-317 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Prospect Knolls A Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$5,607,205 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 5,607,2055,607,205Construction 5,607,205 5,607,205Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 2,202,0352,202,035Construction Fund: Special Assessments 22,92122,921PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 734,071734,071Utility Fund: Sewer 1,136,2531,136,253Utility Fund: Storm 1,511,9251,511,925Utility Fund: Water 5,607,205 5,607,205Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 120 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Branson Street and Oakdale Avenue) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-318 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Morningside E Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,167,047 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,167,0471,167,047Construction 1,167,047 1,167,047Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 477,346477,346Construction Fund: Special Assessments 15,99515,995PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 127,893127,893Utility Fund: Sewer 252,294252,294Utility Fund: Storm 293,519293,519Utility Fund: Water 1,167,047 1,167,047Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 121 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Grove Street, Hanson Road, Dale Avenue, Bernard Place, Code Avenue, Tingdale Avenue, Eastview Drive and West 58th Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-319 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Melody Lake B Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$4,280,096 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 4,280,0964,280,096Construction 4,280,096 4,280,096Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,674,7251,674,725Construction Fund: Special Assessments 33,05233,052PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 558,287558,287Utility Fund: Sewer 864,160864,160Utility Fund: Storm 1,149,8721,149,872Utility Fund: Water 4,280,096 4,280,096Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 122 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Hanson Road, Bernard Place, Code Avenue, Tingdale Avenue, Josephine Avenue and West 59th Street) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-320 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Birchcrest C Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$2,472,414 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 2,472,4142,472,414Construction 2,472,414 2,472,414Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 949,494949,494Construction Fund: Special Assessments 64,53064,530PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 316,524316,524Utility Fund: Sewer 489,940489,940Utility Fund: Storm 651,926651,926Utility Fund: Water 2,472,414 2,472,414Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 123 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (Fuller Street, Abbott Place, West 55th St, Ewing Circle, Beard Avenue, Beard Court, Drew Avenue ) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-321 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Creek Knoll A Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$2,592,496 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 2,592,4962,592,496Construction 2,592,496 2,592,496Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,059,1501,059,150Construction Fund: Special Assessments 38,50838,508PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 283,773283,773Utility Fund: Sewer 559,797559,797Utility Fund: Storm 651,268651,268Utility Fund: Water 2,592,496 2,592,496Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 124 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves the reconstruction and rehabilitation of local streets (West 54th Street - 1/2 Minneapolis) within the project area. This includes replacing the entire pavement surface, repair/replacement of curb and gutter, and upgrading public utilities (watermain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer). The project may also include installation of sump pump discharge pipes, streetlight upgrades, and pedestrian and traffic facility improvements. Project #19-322 Justification Refer to Summary of Street Reconstruction Projects. Useful Life Project Name Creek Knoll B Reconstruction Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,010,713 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,010,7131,010,713Construction 1,010,713 1,010,713Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 419,147419,147Construction Fund: Special Assessments 112,300112,300Utility Fund: Sewer 221,534221,534Utility Fund: Storm 257,732257,732Utility Fund: Water 1,010,713 1,010,713Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 125 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project involves bituminous shared-use path construction along the south side of Hilary Lane from Gleason Road to Valley View Road. The new path will connect to existing sidewalks on Gleason Road, Dewey Hill Road, and to Braemar Boulevard, and will be part of the "twin loops" pedestrian and bicycle network proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. The project will be completed along with the mill and overlay of Hilary Lane in the same area, and will include new curb and gutter between the roadway and new shared use path. Project #19-323 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Hillary Lane Shared Use Path Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$115,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 115,000115,000Construction 115,000 115,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 70,00070,000PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 45,00045,000Utility Fund: Storm 115,000 115,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 126 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves bituminous shared-use path construction along the east side of Tracy Avenue from the roundabout at Valley Lane to Valley View Road north of TH 62. The new path will fill a pedestrian and bicycle gap identified in the 2014 Active Routes to School Plan and will connect to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail and several sidewalk segments. The shared use path will be part of the "twin loops" pedestrian and bicycle network proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. Project #19-324 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Tracy Avenue Shared Use Path Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$35,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 35,00035,000Construction 35,000 35,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 35,00035,000PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 35,000 35,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 127 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction along the north side of W 77th Street from Parklawn Avenue to approximately 250 feet east. This sidewalk segment is recommended in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and will complete a gap between a pedestrian crossing installed in 2016 and sidewalk constructed in 2018. Project #19-325 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name W 77th Street Sidewalk Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$70,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 70,00070,000Construction 70,000 70,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 70,00070,000PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 70,000 70,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 128 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves the installation of buffered bicycle lanes along Valley View Road from W 66th Street to France Avenue. The new bicycle facility is proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and will be completed along with the mill and overlay of Valley View Road in the same area. The outside travel lanes in both directions will be re-striped for the buffered bike lanes, providing separation between motor vehicles and bicycles. Project #19-326 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Valley View Road Buffered Bike Lanes Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$50,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Construction 50,000 50,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 50,000 50,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 129 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves bituminous shared-use path construction along the east side of Gleason Road from Valley View Road to Dewey Hill Road. The new path will connect to existing sidewalks on Valley View Road and Dewey Hill Road, and will be part of the "twin loops" pedestrian and bicycle network proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. The project will be completed along with the mill and overlay of Gleason Road in the same area and will include moving the east curb and gutter in to both narrow the roadway and provide space for the shared use path. Project #19-327 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Gleason Road (South) Shared Use Path Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$215,260 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 215,260215,260Construction 215,260 215,260Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 93,56093,560PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 121,700121,700Utility Fund: Storm 215,260 215,260Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 130 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction along Wooddale Avenue, Andover Road, Kellogg Avenue and Claremore Drive on the east side of the Cornelia Elementary School grounds. These sidewalk segments were recommended in the 2014 Active Routes to School Plan and will connect to sidewalks on W 70th Street, W 72nd Street and Oaklawn Avenue. Project #19-328 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Cornelia Elementary School Sidewalks Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$292,300 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 292,300292,300Construction 292,300 292,300Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 292,300292,300PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 292,300 292,300Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 131 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves the installation of conventional bicycle lanes along Valley Lane and Ridgeview Drive from Valley View Road to W 66th Street. The new bicycle facility is proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and will be completed along with the mill and overlay of Valley Lane and Ridgeview Drive in the same area. The south curb and gutter will be moved out to accommodate the extra pavement width needed for the bike lanes. Project #19-329 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Valley Lane/Ridgeview Drive Bike Lanes Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$113,800 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 113,800113,800Construction 113,800 113,800Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 25,00025,000PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 88,80088,800Utility Fund: Storm 113,800 113,800Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 132 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves bituminous shared-use path construction along the east side of Gleason Road from Valley View Road to the south ramps of TH 62. The new path will connect to existing sidewalks on Valley View Road and across TH 62, and will be part of the "twin loops" pedestrian and bicycle network proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. The project will be completed along with the mill and overlay of Gleason Road in the same area, and will include moving the east curb and gutter in to both narrow the roadway and provide space for the shared use path, which will replace existing concrete sidewalk for most of this segment. Project #19-330 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Gleason Road (North) Shared Use Path Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$308,100 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 308,100308,100Construction 308,100 308,100Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 210,100210,100PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 98,00098,000Utility Fund: Storm 308,100 308,100Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 133 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves bituminous shared-use path construction along the south side of Eden Avenue from Vernon Avenue to Arcadia Avenue. The new path will replace existing sidewalk and will connect to existing bike lanes on Vernon Avenue, and will be part of the pedestrian and bicycle network proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. The project will be completed along with the mill and overlay of Eden Avenue in the same area and will include moving the south curb and gutter in to both narrow the roadway and provide space for the shared use path. Project #19-331 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Eden Avenue Shared Use Path Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$91,200 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 91,20091,200Construction 91,200 91,200Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 62,20062,200PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 29,00029,000Utility Fund: Storm 91,200 91,200Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 134 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves bituminous shared-use path construction along the south side of Dewey Hill Road from Cahill Road to Gleason Road. The new path will replace existing sidewalk and will connect to existing bike lanes on Cahill Road, and will be part of the "twin loops" pedestrian and bicycle network proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. The project will be completed along with the mill and overlay of Dewey Hill Road in the same area and will include moving the south curb and gutter in to both narrow the roadway and provide space for the shared use path. Project #19-332 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Dewey Hill Road Shared Use Path Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$224,300 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 224,300224,300Construction 224,300 224,300Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 153,000153,000PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 71,30071,300Utility Fund: Storm 224,300 224,300Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 135 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves bituminous shared-use path construction along the east side of McCauley Trail from Valley View Road to Gleason Road. The new path will be part of the "twin loops" pedestrian and bicycle network proposed in the 2018 Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan. The project will be completed along with the mill and overlay of McCauley Trail in the same area and will include moving the east/south curb and gutter in to both narrow the roadway and provide space for the shared use path. Project #19-333 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name McCauley Trail Shared Use Path Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$409,200 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 409,200409,200Construction 409,200 409,200Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 177,800177,800PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 231,400231,400Utility Fund: Storm 409,200 409,200Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 136 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Mark Nolan Description This project involves concrete sidewalk construction along the north/east side of Olinger Boulevard from Tracy Avenue to Olinger Road. This sidewalk segment was recommended in the 2014 Active Routes to School Plan and will connect to existing sidewalks on Tracy Avenue, Sun Road and Olinger Road. Project #19-334 Justification Refer to Summary of Pedestrian/Bike Improvements. Useful Life Project Name Olinger Boulevard Sidewalk Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$533,500 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 533,500533,500Construction 533,500 533,500Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 533,500533,500PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees 533,500 533,500Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 137 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project will meet increasing sewer capacity needs in southeast Edina by extending the York Avenue sanitary sewer trunk line. The project follows the Southeast Edina Sanitary Sewer Study (Barr Engineering 2017) The project builds off of CIP 15-147 that included two phases, one in 2017 and another planned for 2019. The project area includes York Avenue north of the Promenade. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. Efforts to reduce infiltration and inflow of clean waters reduce future capital and infrastructure need both locally and in the regional treatment system. Project #19-335 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on need. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Sanitary Trunk Capacity Expansion York Segs 2-3 Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$2,500,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 350,000350,000Planning and Design 2,150,0002,150,000Construction 2,500,000 2,500,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 2,500,0002,500,000Utility Fund: Sewer 2,500,000 2,500,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 138 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project will meet increasing sewer capacity needs in southeast Edina by extending the York Avenue sanitary sewer trunk line. The project follows the Southeast Edina Sanitary Sewer Study (Barr Engineering 2017) The project builds off of CIP 15-147 that included two phases, one in 2017 and another planned for 2019. The project area includes York Avenue north of 66th, and 69th Street between Barrie Rd and York. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. Efforts to reduce infiltration and inflow of clean waters reduce future capital and infrastructure need both locally and in the regional treatment system. COST CONSIDERATIONS: This project qualifies for potential TIF/HRA funding. If Southdale TIF generates additional revenue, in its closing years, funding could be directed to this project. Project #19-336 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on need. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Sanitary Trunk Capacity Exp York Seg 4 & Fairview Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$3,000,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 400,000400,000Planning and Design 2,600,0002,600,000Construction 3,000,000 3,000,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 3,000,0003,000,000Utility Fund: Sewer 3,000,000 3,000,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 139 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project will meet increasing sewer capacity needs in a part of the Grandview Area by updating a lift station. The project follows the construction of a new apartment building on Eden Avenue and planning for new capacity needs identified as part of the Grandview Area small area plan. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: Lift station upgrades allows us to consider energy efficient pumps and controls to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: Site modifications may be considered to reduce impervious surfaces with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods may be utilized tp reduce greenhouse gases associated with equipment installations or operations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. Project #19-337 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on need. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Sanitary Trunk Capacity Exp Grandview Lift Station Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$275,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 25,00025,000Planning and Design 250,000250,000Construction 25,000 250,000 275,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 275,00025,000 250,000Utility Fund: Sewer 25,000 250,000 275,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 140 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project repairs and replaces components of Lift Station 6 (LS6). LS6 a key sanitary sewer system component located near 72nd St West and Oaklawn Avenue that serves about two-thirds of the City for trunk sanitary sewer. We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. The project will be conducted in coordination with CIP 17-078. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: Lift station upgrades allows us to consider energy efficient pumps, lighting and controls to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: Site modifications may be considered to reduce impervious surfaces with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods may be utilized to reduce greenhouse gases associated with equipment installations or operations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. Project #19-338 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This is part of our City Work Plan to maintain optimum facility operations. Deferral of maintenance is always more expensive. We used the Building Owners Managers Association (BOMA) 110 ten year old standard to schedule replacements for critical building envelope components This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Lift Station 6 Rehabilitation Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$900,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 100,000100,000Planning and Design 800,000800,000Construction 900,000 900,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 900,000900,000Utility Fund: Sewer 900,000 900,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 141 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project repairs and replaces components of Lift Station 3 (LS3). LS3 a key sanitary sewer system component located near Warden Avenue west of Tracy that serves portions of Presidents, Interlachen Park, Parkwood Knolls, Fox Meadow, Grandview, Melody Lake, Rolling Green, Hilldale, Countryside and Highlands Neighborhoods for trunk sanitary sewer. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Carbon: Lift station upgrades allows us to consider energy efficient pumps and controls to reduce the environmental impact. Surface water: Lift Station 3 is at risk of flooding. This project will consider raising the station out of the floodplain to increase system resilience to flooding. Site modifications may be considered to reduce impervious surfaces with low impact development techniques. Green Alternatives: Alternative construction methods may be utilized tp reduce greenhouse gases associated with equipment installations or operations, and hydro-seeding restoration versus traditional sod placement when feasible. Project #19-339 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Lift Station 3 Rehabilitation Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$550,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Planning and Design 500,000500,000Construction 550,000 550,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 550,000550,000Utility Fund: Sewer 550,000 550,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 142 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description This project will use flow metering and groundwater data to target areas with high potential for groundwater infiltration and flood inflow for investigation and elimination of cross connections and leak points. Inflow of storm and ground water into the sanitary sewer system uses up system capacity, increases the risk of back flow, and wastes money and natural resources to convey and treat. A variety of methods such as in-home inspection, smoke testings, dye testing, and video will be used to identify and eliminate sources of inflow in the targeted area. Cost effective interventions will be designed and implemented in the following year. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. Efforts to reduce infiltration and inflow of clean waters reduce future capital and infrastructure need both locally and in the regional treatment system. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Reduction of inflow and infiltration reduces metered flow which determines the City share of Met Council regional system expense. Project #19-340 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on the age and condition of the pavement surfaces, public utility systems, and pedestrian and traffic facilities. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Sanitary Targeted Inflow Reduction Project Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$200,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 70,00070,000Planning and Design 130,000130,000Construction 70,000 130,000 200,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 200,00070,000 130,000Utility Fund: Sewer 70,000 130,000 200,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 143 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description The Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan guides stormwater runoff, flood control, water, and wetland habitat issues. The document is based on hydrologic and hydraulic modeling to identify current and future stormwater issues. This project will begin to identify potential solutions to the issues with the highest priority that are not already scheduled to be corrected as part of the neighborhood street reconstruction program. It also includes development of the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy as well as subsequent implementation of flood risk reduction activities in the Morningside and Weber Park areas. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The strategy development is an investigation and planning effort which will result in a report. Implementation items will be defined through the strategy development and environmental considerations will be determined as further defined improvements are scheduled. COST CONSIDERATIONS: There is potential for grants and cost sharing with local partners depending on the outcomes of the strategy and scope of subsequent improvements. Infrastructure improvements will require ongoing operation and maintenance. Project #19-341 Justification The 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) sets out a framework for a detailed strategy to address flooding issues in the City. The CWRMP defines the Morningside and Weber Park areas as focus geographies for the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy. Useful Life Project Name Flood Protect Strat & Morningside Weber Flood Proj Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$4,250,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 4,250,000250,000 2,500,000 1,500,000Planning and Design 250,000 2,500,000 1,500,000 4,250,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 4,250,000250,000 2,500,000 1,500,000Utility Fund: Storm 250,000 2,500,000 1,500,000 4,250,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 144 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Jessica Wilson Description This CIP item includes development of the Clean Water Strategy as well as subsequent implementation of clean water activities for Lake Cornelia. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The strategy development is an investigation and planning effort which will result in a report. Implementation items will be defined through the strategy development and environmental considerations will be determined as further defined improvements are scheduled. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has set aside CIP dollars to address clean water issues in Lake Cornelia in the next few years. This item aligns with their effort to leverage the investment. Infrastructure improvements will require ongoing operation and maintenance. Project #19-342 Justification The 2018 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) sets out a framework for a detailed strategy to address clean water issues in the City. The CWRMP defines Lake Cornelia as focus geography for the Clean Water Strategy. Useful Life Project Name Clean Wtr Strat & Lake Cornelia Clean Water Proj Category Infrastructure Type New Total Project Cost:$1,600,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 850,000250,000 600,000Planning and Design 250,000 600,000 850,000Total Future 750,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 850,000250,000 600,000Utility Fund: Storm 250,000 600,000 850,000Total Future 750,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 145 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Jessica Wilson Description Update to the City's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan which describes city procedures for minimizing pollution related to illicit discharges, construction activity, and municipal operations. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a planning level effort. The objective of the report is to guide pollution prevention. Project #19-345 Justification The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan is a requirement of the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. The current 5-year permit will expire in July 2018. An update to the SWPPP is expected to be required as part of the new permit cycle. Useful Life Project Name SWPPP Major Amendment and Model Update Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$40,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 40,00040,000Planning and Design 40,000 40,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 40,00040,000Utility Fund: Storm 40,000 40,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 146 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Jessica Wilson Description A major update to the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan may be required to incorporate the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy (CIP item 19-ST1) and Clean Water Strategy (CIP item 19-ST2). ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This would incorporate the aforementioned strategies into the existing CWRMP. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Some grant funding sources, such as the Clean Water Fund, may require implementation items to be included in an approved plan such as the CWRMP. Project #19-346 Justification The Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (CWRMP) lays out a framework for developing the Flood Risk Reduction Strategy and Clean Water Strategy. These would be considered major amendments to the CWRMP. Useful Life Project Name CWRMP Major Amendment and Model Update Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$167,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 167,000167,000Planning and Design 167,000 167,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 167,000167,000Utility Fund: Storm 167,000 167,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 147 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Jessica Wilson Description Regular inspection and maintenance of stormwater infrastructure including structure clean outs, stormwater pond sediment assessment/dredging/disposal, infrastructure repairs, and other activities to ensure existing systems are operating as designed. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Properly maintained stormwater infrastructure is necessary to provide flood protection and clean water services. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Ongoing maintenance is required for stormwater infrastructure. Maintaining the existing infrastructure is generally more cost effective than investing new capital to achieve the desired service level outcome. Project #19-347 Justification To protect the infrastructure investments that have already been made. The Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan flood inundation modeling assumes that the stormwater network is operating effectively - proper maintenance is required to continue to provide the desired level of service. We have a maintenance agreement with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to maintain the water quality ponds at Pamela Park. Maintenance for these ponds is coming due. A portion of this request will cover the testing, dredging, and disposal of sediment for these ponds. Useful Life Project Name Stormwater Best Management Practices Maintenance Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$575,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 525,000275,000 30,000 120,000 50,000 50,000Planning and Design 275,000 30,000 120,000 50,000 50,000 525,000Total Future 50,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 525,000275,000 30,000 120,000 50,000 50,000Utility Fund: Storm 275,000 30,000 120,000 50,000 50,000 525,000Total Future 50,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 148 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description As part of the 2012 Water Treatment Plant #6 design and construction and the 2018 Water Plan Update, the water distribution system in the Grandview Area is in need of improvements. The WTP #6 is unable to produce at full capacity because of a lack of pipe size in the distribution system. This project would install watermain from WTP #6 to the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard, to Vernon Avenue west on the alignment between Jerry's Corporate and Walgreens, and to Arcadia Avenue along the north property line of the old public works facility. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. Efforts to reduce water leaks reduce pumping costs and associated energy use, and reduce future capital and infrastructure need both locally and in the regional production system. Project #19-348 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are: Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on need. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Grandview Area Watermain Improvements PH 1 Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$318,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 53,00053,000Planning and Design 265,000265,000Construction 318,000 318,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 318,000318,000Utility Fund: Water 318,000 318,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 149 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Ross Bintner Description As part of the 2012 Water Treatment Plant #6 design and construction and the 2018 Water Plan Update, the water distribution system in the Grandview Area is in need of improvements. The WTP #6 is unable to produce at full capacity because of a lack of pipe size in the distribution system. The project would install new watermain pipe from Arcadia Avenue to Grange Road along Vernon Avenue and 50th Street. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Utility pipe rehabilitation through trenchless technologies reduces greenhouse gases associated with open cut installations. Efforts to reduce water leaks reduce pumping costs and associated energy use, and reduce future capital and infrastructure need both locally and in the regional production system. Project #19-349 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on need. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Grandview Area Watermain Improvements PH 2 Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$240,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 40,00040,000Planning and Design 200,000200,000Construction 240,000 240,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 240,000240,000Utility Fund: Water 240,000 240,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 150 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Carter Schulze Description Since September of 2014, it has been advantageous to assess water main pipe conditions in project areas of future street reconstruction. The non- invasive water main testing provides us with more data about the condition of our water main system similar to closed circuit televising does for sanitary sewer trunk pipes. This data, plus water main break data proves to be a powerful tool in determining where to spend our water main funds to get the greatest value to our water main system. Assessments typically occur two years in advance of a neighborhood reconstruction project and include approximately 20,000 linear feet of watermain per year. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The watermain condition data allows us to only replace the pipes that need it with this infrastructure replacement cycle. By getting the most life out of the existing watermain pipes, we are reducing the need for new resources where they are not needed. This lowers our potential carbon footprint and uses only the necessary resources to provide the level of service required. Project #19-351 Justification The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities, and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” The City’s 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan Goals 1 and 3 are; Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure and Plan for Connected & Sustainable Development, respectively. Properly maintained streets, water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer systems provide reliable and efficient operations that lessen the City’s carbon footprint and reduce energy costs. Connected and sustainable development includes an efficient multi- modal transportation system that balances improving personal mobility options with reducing the community’s carbon footprint all the while reducing negative impacts on human health and safety. This project is the implementation of the mission statement and the budget work plan goals. The recommended schedule is based on need. It may also be coordinated with other city, county, and state projects in the area. Useful Life Project Name Water Main Condition Assessment Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$795,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 655,000120,000 125,000 130,000 140,000 140,000Planning and Design 120,000 125,000 130,000 140,000 140,000 655,000Total Future 140,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 655,000120,000 125,000 130,000 140,000 140,000Utility Fund: Water 120,000 125,000 130,000 140,000 140,000 655,000Total Future 140,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 151 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description Strip existing interior and exterior coating system and repaint Community Center Water Tower (5849 Ruth Dr.) Project #19-908 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply and reliable sanitary sewer service. Existing coating is beginning to fail in spots. Useful Life Project Name Recondition Coating System, Community Center Tower Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$800,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 800,000800,000Installation/Maintenance 800,000 800,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 800,000800,000Utility Fund: Water 800,000 800,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 152 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the purchase and installation of five electric water tank mixers. The mixers improve water circulation within the storage tanks, leading to lower water age which lessens the chance of unwanted disinfection by products while improving desired disinfection residuals. Mixing also prevents ice formation in the elevated tanks during winter months which can lead to coating and structural damage. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Identified product has the lowest life cycle cost versus competing products. Project #19-909 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. Useful Life Project Name Tower and Reservoir Mixers Category Infrastructure Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$70,000 Dept Scoring 27 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 70,00070,000Construction 70,000 70,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 70,00070,000Utility Fund: Water 70,000 70,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 153 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 2 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. We recommend replacing: 2021 electrical system ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #19-910 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a well rehabilitation schedule based on one billion gallons pumped. Useful Life Project Name Well #2 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$150,000 Dept Scoring 28 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 150,000150,000Installation/Maintenance 150,000 150,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 150,000150,000Utility Fund: Water 150,000 150,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 154 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 7 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #19-913 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a well rehabilitation schedule based on one billion gallons pumped. Useful Life Project Name Well #7 Rehabilitation Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$120,000 Dept Scoring 27 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Installation/Maintenance 120,000 120,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 120,000120,000Utility Fund: Water 120,000 120,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 155 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 10 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. We recommend replacing: 2022 Interior and Exterior doors, roof replacement, painting, gas unit heaters, controls, lighting fixtures, crackfilling/ sealing stucco walls, fire alarm system and sprinklers. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #19-914 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a well rehabilitation schedule based on one billion gallons pumped. Useful Life Project Name Well #10 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$420,000 Dept Scoring 27 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Construction 300,000300,000Installation/Maintenance 420,000 420,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 420,000420,000Utility Fund: Water 420,000 420,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 156 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well # 11 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. We recommend replacing: 2023 Exterior doors and Interior doors, roof replacement, painting,gas unit heaters, controls, lighting fixtures, crackfilling/ sealing stucco walls, fire alarm system and sprinklers. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #19-915 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a well rehabilitation schedule based on one billion gallons pumped. Useful Life Project Name Well #11 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvements Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$420,000 Dept Scoring 26 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Construction 300,000300,000Installation/Maintenance 420,000 420,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 420,000420,000Utility Fund: Water 420,000 420,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 157 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well #13 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. We recommend replacing: 2019 Roof hatch, lighting and well rehabilitation. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #19-916 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a well rehabilitation schedule based on one billion gallons pumped. Useful Life Project Name Well #13 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$166,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Construction 46,00046,000Installation/Maintenance 166,000 166,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 166,000166,000Utility Fund: Water 166,000 166,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 158 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well #17 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. We recommend replacing: 2023 Well rehabilitation, exterior doors, roof replacement, floor finishes, painting, gas unit heaters, controls, lighting fixtures,plumbing fixtures. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #19-917 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a well rehabilitation schedule based on one billion gallons pumped. Useful Life Project Name Well #17 Rehabilitation and Facility Improvement Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$166,000 Dept Scoring 26 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Construction 46,00046,000Installation/Maintenance 166,000 166,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 166,000166,000Utility Fund: Water 166,000 166,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 159 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description This project would include the rehabilitation of Well #20 by repairing or replacing the well pump, motor, and other worn equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Motor and pump assembly are premium efficient rated and controlled by Variable Frequency Drives (VFD) that optimize energy use and pump efficiency. Project #19-918 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply. In order to provide a reliable, sound infrastructure, the Public Works Department has implemented a well rehabilitation schedule based on one billion gallons pumped. Useful Life Project Name Well #20 Rehabilitation Category Infrastructure Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$120,000 Dept Scoring 26 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Construction 120,000 120,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 120,000120,000Utility Fund: Water 120,000 120,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 160 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Land 17-002 3,000,0003,000,000HRA Land Acquisition for Affordable Housing 3,000,0003,000,000Land Total GRAND TOTAL 3,000,0003,000,000 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 161 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Bill Neuendorf Description Acquisition of 1 to 3 acres of property for redevelopment as multi-family housing rented at prices affordable to moderate income families and seniors of limited means. No specific locations have been identified at this time. Possible locations could include properties in or near commercial districts with access to transit. Project #17-002 Justification The Metropolitan Council indicates that low and moderate income families are challenged to find good housing at affordable rates. They indicate that Edina's share of new affordably-priced housing units is approximately 800 new units. Few real estate developers construct affordably-priced housing for moderate-income families and seniors of limited means. In order to advance the Vision Edina goal of creating new affordable housing, it may be necessary for the City to assemble land and sell or lease it at a reduced cost so that affordable rental rates can be provided over the long term. Useful Life Project Name HRA Land Acquisition for Affordable Housing Category Land Type New Total Project Cost:$3,000,000 Dept Scoring 15 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 3,000,0003,000,000Land Acquisition 3,000,000 3,000,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 3,000,0003,000,000HRA Fund: Southdale 2 TIF 3,000,000 3,000,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 162 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Parks 19-343 300,000100,000 100,000 100,000Shoreline Naturalization 19-344 340,00050,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 80,000Natural Areas Maintenance 19-766 A 300,000300,000Fred Richards Park Renovation - Phase I 940,000450,000 160,000 170,000 80,000 80,000Parks Total GRAND TOTAL 940,000450,000 160,000 170,000 80,000 80,000 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 163 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Jessica Wilson Description Naturalization of public shorelines around waterbodies throughout the City. This practice will reduce the need for mowing along shorelines and is a best management practice for healthy waterbodies. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Naturalized shorelines help reduce pollutant loading to waterbodies and provide wildlife habitat. Additionally, these areas will no longer need to be maintained as turf. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Natural areas will require ongoing maintenance. Project #19-343 Justification The Parks chapter of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan provides goals and policies for natural resources and conservation management. The background information of this section states, "Consistent with national trends, Edina residents have voiced a strong interest in the protection and restoration of Edina’s natural resources. The community wants to examine ways to better restore native landscaping and maintain native vegetative buffers along the riparian corridors of Minnehaha Creek and Nine-Mile Creek, and the small lakes in Edina, to maintain and improve water quality, and to provide more and higher quality habitat for birds and wildlife." Useful Life Project Name Shoreline Naturalization Category Parks Type New Total Project Cost:$300,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 300,000100,000 100,000 100,000Planning and Design 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 300,000100,000 100,000 100,000Utility Fund: Storm 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 164 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Jessica Wilson Description Maintenance of naturalized areas throughout the city to protect investment in restored areas. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Naturalized spaces promote cleaner air, cleaner water, and wildlife habitat. Additionally, naturalized spaces can be managed to effectively control invasive species such as buckthorn. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Maintenance tends to be the most intense in early years of restoration and is less so as native plant communities become established. This item proposed increasing costs over time in anticipation of increased naturalized acreage. Project #19-344 Justification Major investments in naturalized areas such as the Braemar Academy 9 course and Braemar 18-hole course have already been made. Ongoing maintenance is required to protect this initial investment. This item also covers maintenance of additional areas yet to be added. Useful Life Project Name Natural Areas Maintenance Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$420,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 80,00080,000Planning and Design 260,00050,000 60,000 70,000 80,000Installation/Maintenance 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 80,000 340,000Total Future 80,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 340,00050,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 80,000Utility Fund: Storm 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 80,000 340,000Total Future 80,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 165 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Ann Kattreh Description This is Phase 1 of the Fred Richards Park Renovation representing the playground. In summary, the master plan concept recommendation is as follows: 1. Nature Bank – Pursue the wetland banking approach. Several nodes are included in the "Pathways to Play" concept: Pollinator; Habitat; Contemplation; Woodland; Water. 2. Neighborhood Park - The neighborhood playground is highlighted along with a picnic shelter. Residential connections to the larger park are achieved with a bridge and the Nine Mile Creek Trail. This would be more of a traditional playground facility for the Parklawn neighborhood. 3. Great Lawn - open lawn with possible athletic fields 4. Central Green - Elements included in this area are a traditional playground, pickleball courts and a multi-purpose sport court that could be used for basketball and futsal. Mounds and berms have been created to create visual and recreational interest and amenities. The berms will provide screening for neighbors to the north and west and can be used for sitting, sledding, relaxing and exploring. Creating the mounds also reduce grading costs by creating a location for soils to be relocated onsite instead of being removed from the site. 5. The Loop – The loop focuses on a rolling walking trail, gardens, seating areas and possibly public art. 6. Clubhouse Building – There continues to be interest in renovating the clubhouse for a restaurant/brewpub as well as potentially teaming with Three Rivers Park District for programming and creating trailhead features. A potential craft brew pub type facility similar to Crooked Pint in Chaska was given as an example for continued revenue to support park maintenance. This concept will be studied in greater detail if the concept is supported by the City Council. The concept plan shows an enlarged Clubhouse, but the cost to improve this building is not included in the project cost estimate. 7. Parking – The concept includes 155 parking stalls on Fred Richards Park property with the addition of a parking lot. The plan needs additional parking from the Pentagon Park/Link development. Outside of city property the project hopes for 100 shared “parkway” stalls and 134 stalls in a shared parking lot. Detailed design and construction documents need to be completed. The final design process will take 6 - 9 months. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This project will be a model project for environmental restoration and stormwater management. The City will work with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the state Board of Water and Soil Resources (BOWSR) to complete this project. Many trees will be planted on the site. If athletic field lighting and pickleball court lighting is installed, it will be LED with no-spill lighting technology. Project #19-766 A Justification In 2016 the City Council approved the final Fred Richards Park Master Plan document. In the Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure section of the 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan it states: Identify funding source and timeline for implementation of the Fred Richards Park Master Plan by Q2 of 2018. Useful Life Project Name Fred Richards Park Renovation - Phase I Category Parks Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$300,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Planning and Design 250,000250,000Construction 300,000 300,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 300,000300,000Construction Fund: Park Dedication 300,000 300,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 166 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Technology 15-173 175,00035,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000Asset Management Software and Equipment 15-184 145,00095,000 50,000Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling 17-001 78,00078,000Grandview/50th Camera System 17-050 42,00042,000Police Computer Forensic Equipment 17-052 92,27645,000 15,450 31,826Police License Plate Reader (ALPR) Replacement 17-054 1,000,0001,000,000Police Public Safety CAD and RMS 17-055 20,00020,000Police CAD Workstations 17-057 80,00030,000 50,000Police Dispatch Radio Console Connectivity 17-058 27,50027,500Police Emergency Medical Dispatch Software 17-157 100,000100,000EOC Video/Computer Technology 17-163 50,00050,000City of Edina Network Storage 18-001 1,000,000500,000 500,000ERP System 19-503 210,000210,000Plan Review Software 19-906 120,000120,000Fiber Installation, LS #6 and WTP #3 19-907 180,000180,000Fiber Installation, WTP #4 3,319,776830,000 850,000 1,327,950 276,826 35,000Technology Total GRAND TOTAL 3,319,776830,000 850,000 1,327,950 276,826 35,000 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 167 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Engineering20192023thru Contact Chad Millner Description This project continues to update and improve our current asset management system computer software and associated equipment to be more interactive with the public and mobile with City Staff. The current system contains map and condition assessment information on all infrastructure assets such as water, sanitary, storm, transportation, traffic and electrical systems. Software systems connect the EdinaToGo citizen request application with Cityworks asset management software and ESRI geographical information system software. Public works crews use tablets to assess and record infrastructure condition, create and fulfill service requests and work orders. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Efficiency in management and operations allows more work with less trips and effort. Project #15-173 Justification The need is emphasized in the 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan to "evaluate and employ technological advancements to provide city services" and to "provide a level of City services that sets Edina apart from other communities." Useful Life Project Name Asset Management Software and Equipment Category Technology Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$245,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 175,00035,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000Software 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000Total Prior 70,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00010,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Utility Fund: Sewer 75,00015,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000Utility Fund: Storm 50,00010,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Utility Fund: Water 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000Total Prior 70,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 168 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Communications and Technol20192023thru Contact Ryan Browning Description The City’s installed fiber optic network provides connectivity from City Hall to remote City facilities and LOGIS, facilitating voice and data communication at very high speeds. Fiber optic technology is secure, reliable and fast, and has a useful life expectancy of approximately 30 years. Nearly all of the City’s staffed facilities are now connected via fiber optic lines. The City has used fiber optic technology to replace traditional copper, leased circuits and wireless connections in order to improve bandwidth, consolidate connectivity needs and reduce or eliminate telephone and data communication expenses. By leveraging a single-owned connection method for multiple technology and communication needs, the City has been able to eliminate expensive recurring T-1 voice and data connections, while dramatically improving performance and management of the City’s voice and data network. Estimates for proposed fiber sites: Arden Park ($65,000), Fred Richards Site ($60,000), Centennial Lakes maintenance building ($25,000), and Courtney Fields ($25,000). An additional $30,000 is needed to complete work to give sites redundancy. A yearly allocation for fiber optic cabling is an important investment in the City's infrastructure as it allows the Communications & Technology Services Department the flexibility to be responsive as buildings are built, remodeled or re-purposed. Without this fund, the connections to these buildings are subject to the project funds available at the time. In the past, this has resulted in slow connections that are not easily managed nor flexible enough to support future needs at the buildings. Project #15-184 Justification Included in the City's mission statement is the following: "Our mission is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities..." Our continued expansion and maintenance of our fiber infrastructure assists in improving public services at our many facilities and parks. Useful Life Project Name Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling Category Technology Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$145,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 145,00095,000 50,000Vehicles and Equipment 95,000 50,000 145,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 145,00095,000 50,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 95,000 50,000 145,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 169 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration: Liquor Stores20192023thru Contact Steve Grausam Description This proposal is for the replacement of the security camera system at the 50th Street and Grandview Stores. This system is outdated as technology has changed significantly in the past 10 years. The upgraded system proposed is currently installed at the Southdale store. Our goal is to update our old systems so that we are consistent throughout our facilities. This will improve the efficiency of our staff as we do not have to maintain two separate IT systems. The upgrade will allow us to access the video footage from the internet, allowing the police to have faster access to the material in their attempts to apprehend suspects of illegal activity in or around our stores. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: We are not aware of any greener alternatives. Project #17-001 Justification Section 11.2 of the Comprehensive Plan reads: "protect and serve the community with the highest quality of law enforcement services, and to improve the quality of life through eradication of criminal activity and conditions that have a detrimental impact on public safety." The replacement of these security cameras helps to protect against theft and criminal activity in and around Edina Liquor stores. In addition, Vision Edina identifies five features of our future community, one of which is being "Future Oriented." The statement reads: We continually look forward and are always working to remain competitive, relevant and innovative." Updating our technology helps us to increase profits, decrease costs, and maintain a safe environment for our customers - all of which are essential for pursuing this goal. Useful Life Project Name Grandview/50th Camera System Category Technology Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$78,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 70,00070,000Vehicles and Equipment 8,0008,000Installation/Maintenance 78,000 78,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 78,00078,000Liquor Fund 78,000 78,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 170 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Tim Olson Description The Edina Police Department Investigations Unit has one detective trained to conduct digital forensic examinations. The forensic examiner utilizes specialized equipment and software to view and exam information that is present, hidden, encrypted, compressed, and/or deleted on devices including: computer towers, laptops, external/internal hard drives, cellular phones, global positioning systems (GPS), tablets, and other digital media. Digital products are ever changing as technology advances at an exponential rate. As digital consumer electronics advance technologically, the forensic equipment used to examine them must keep pace. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: A review of the major manufactures of computer forensic towers did not reveal any specific Eco/Environmentally friendly product. At this time, we are not aware of any specific eco-friendly alternatives for the forensic tower. The dell monitors are energy star rated, and have a gold EPEAT rating. Additionally, the monitors are TCO Certified. A TCO Certified display meets life cycle sustainability criteria such as socially responsible manufacturing, environment and ergonomics / health and safety. COST CONSIDERATIONS: Annual/reoccurring costs associated with software licensing fees are $11,620.00. The bulk of these fees are currently covered by the United States Secrete Service, but are not anticipated to be paid for indefinitely. The software is necessary for forensic examinations. Project #17-050 Justification Since 1991, when the World Wide Web was created, the use of the Internet and computer based devices has seen a rapid growth in criminal uses through email, instant messaging, online chat rooms, social networking, and of networked computers and cellular devices. These devices create and store huge amounts of data in their memory or log files. Even technology savvy users might not know how to delete multiple trails of evidence creating a vast amount of incriminating information related to criminal investigations. The soaring use of the Internet and technology leaves our community at great risk for being victimized through electronic devices. Cyber attacks; hacking, and computer-based criminal activity are costing businesses billions of dollars each year. Computer forensics involves the identification, extraction, preservation, and documentation of computer based evidence stored as data. Private industry has taken this threat seriously for years but law enforcement is just starting to position for computer forensics. Currently, Edina Police Department forensic examinations have assisted in the investigation and/or prosecution of crimes related to fraud, burglary, domestic violence, stalking, crimes against children, and narcotics violations. Useful Life Project Name Police Computer Forensic Equipment Category Technology Type New Total Project Cost:$42,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 42,00042,000Vehicles and Equipment 42,000 42,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 42,00042,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 42,000 42,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 171 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Jeff Elasky Description Currently the Edina Police Department has six Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPR). These units are attached to the lightbars of marked squad vehicles. When an officer is patrolling around the Community, the ALPR's cameras record vehicle license plates on the roadway. Officers are able to be more pro-active locating stolen vehicle, revoked or suspended drivers, and warrants of violators. In 2018, each unit is $15,000. The manufacturer claims the units have a five year life expectancy. - Replace three units in 2020, purchased in 2014 - Replace one unit in 2021, purchased in 2015 - Replace two units in 2022, purchased in 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Using ALPR technology allows officers to work more efficiently, which results in fewer vehicle miles traveled, leading to fewer emissions. Project #17-052 Justification This technology brings a higher level of safety to the community as a whole. It allows officers to 'look' at hundreds of vehicles vs. just a few dozen during a normal 12 hour shift. ALPR's offers a more accurate and timely information for officers making enforcement decisions. Useful Life Project Name Police License Plate Reader (ALPR) Replacement Category Technology Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$92,276 Dept Scoring 15 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 92,27645,000 15,450 31,826Vehicles and Equipment 45,000 15,450 31,826 92,276Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 92,27645,000 15,450 31,826Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 45,000 15,450 31,826 92,276Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 172 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Aaron White Description The Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), Mobile Computing, and Records Management System (RMS) is utilized to provide police and fire dispatch services, information management, and digital records management services for the police department. Services are also provided with these systems to Edina Fire as well as Richfield Police and Fire through our cooperative dispatch services agreement. We currently use a system from SunGard Public Sector (formerly OSSI) called ONESolution that was installed in 2008. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Computer hardware including file servers, workstations, displays, and portable computers, is advancing in power efficiency and recycle-ability. Our IT department is currently moving toward hosting numerous file server applications on more efficient single "Virtual Server" machines which will further improve energy efficiency of future computer technology acquisitions. COST CONSIDERATIONS: It is anticipated current operating budget for licensing and maintenance fees would continue to cover those expenses for a new system. Project #17-054 Justification The CAD/RMS/Mobile system is critical and essential public safety infrastructure. It is based on computer hardware and software architecture which is technology that evolves rapidly. Being highly industry specific and propriety in nature it is also very expensive both in initial capital investment and ongoing maintenance costs. The initial capital cost of our current system was approximately $700,000 and as of 2016 costs approximately $110,000 per year in annual maintenance and license fees. Ongoing advances in technology, difficultly in integrating this software with evolving county, state, and national databases, the potential for improved operating efficiency, and the significant ongoing operating costs demand that we research alternatives and plan for obsolescence of our current system. Researching, purchasing, and implementing a new solution could take up to two years. The estimated costs are speculative at this time and our hope is that competition in the market place along with evolving technology will lower the current projection. Useful Life Project Name Police Public Safety CAD and RMS Category Technology Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,000,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,000,0001,000,000Vehicles and Equipment 1,000,000 1,000,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,000,0001,000,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 1,000,000 1,000,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 173 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dave Nelson Description The dispatch positions in our communication center use specialized computer workstations for Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and other related software applications. Each workstation utilizes two displays including a large 46" display. Powerful computers are required to run these programs and displays. The facility operates 24/7 providing critical public safety dispatch services. This project will replace five CAD workstations currently deployed in the communications center. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Each new generation of computer hardware including workstations and displays is advancing in power efficiency and recycle-ability. Project #17-055 Justification Computer hardware and software evolves very quickly and the useful life of this technology is relatively short. Purchasing high quality workstations allows us to project a four year life cycle of the current workstations replaced in 2017. CAD workstations are eligible for funding from our E911 budget. Useful Life Project Name Police CAD Workstations Category Technology Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$20,000 Dept Scoring 51 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 20,00020,000Vehicles and Equipment 20,000 20,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 20,00020,000E911 20,000 20,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 174 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dave Nelson Description The radio consoles that interface our dispatch center to the statewide ARMER radio system rely on two connections, one a direct fiber connection that was installed in 2017 and second a fiber connection into a microwave link installed in 2004. It is projected that the microwave radio system will become less reliable and we will rely more on the direct fiber connection. The microwave does not have a life expectancy at this time but the physical microwave could last for as long as 30 years. We will however need need some connected equipment replaced and serviced to maintain the microwave. This project will occurred in two phases. In 2017 phase one was implemented and a LOGIS fiber optic cable was connected as the new primary network path for our radio system. Phase two will be to replace some of the existing microwave radio system equipment. With a new primary radio link in place we hope to extend the life of the microwave system to 2021 or beyond. With advancing technology the 2021 cost forecast in the equipment replacement schedule has been adjusted down from $327,880, then $250,000 to the current $50,000 for specific equipment. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: New technology is likely to be more power efficient. There are not any green alternatives to the equipment required to provide this critical service. Project #17-057 Justification Our dispatch connectivity to the ARMER radio system is a critical and essential public safety infrastructure. 100% uptime is essential for providing public safety services and assuring responder safety. Useful Life Project Name Police Dispatch Radio Console Connectivity Category Technology Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$80,000 Dept Scoring 47 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 80,00030,000 50,000Vehicles and Equipment 30,000 50,000 80,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 80,00030,000 50,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 30,000 50,000 80,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 175 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dave Nelson Description Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) is a process where trained dispatchers assess medical emergencies in more detail during 911 calls and are able to provide life saving pre-arrival instructions to callers. It also allows dispatchers to more accurately provision Emergency Medical Services (EMS) resources and provide more detailed information to EMS responders while en-route to emergency scenes. It is an important part of our EMS response. The EMD process is facilitated by computer software that integrates with our Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) systems. Our current software provided by Priority Dispatch was purchased in 2007 and last upgraded in 2017. Computer software and industry practices evolve over time and staying current is critical to providing high quality EMS services. New software can also provide added functionality in triaging emergency calls and more effectively provisioning other police and fire resources beyond EMS. This project is also tied to Public Safety CAD replacement 17-054. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: EMD software operates on existing CAD workstations. It will not require any additional energy resources. Environmental stewardship may be a factor for consideration in selecting a software vendor for this project. Project #17-058 Justification Providing high quality Emergency Medical Services is a top priority of the Edina Police and Fire Departments. Providing efficient and accurate pre-arrival instructions to 911 callers during incidents such as respiratory or cardiac arrest, choking, bleeding, or other critical trauma is absolutely essential and can make the difference between life and death for patients. 911 dispatchers are challenged by increasing workloads in a stressful work environment. Efficient and easy to use software can allow dispatchers to perform EMD in more situations and improve accuracy and quality of service. As with the provision of any medical services accuracy and proficiency are critical in ensuring positive outcomes and minimizing liability. Useful Life Project Name Police Emergency Medical Dispatch Software Category Technology Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$27,500 Dept Scoring 20 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 27,50027,500Software 27,500 27,500Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 27,50027,500E911 27,500 27,500Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 176 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Darrell Todd Description Replace and upgrade existing video/computer technology in the primary Emergency Operations Center at Fire Station 1. Current equipment was purchased and installed in 2013. Project #17-157 Justification It is essential that our EOC maintains state of the art technology. Regular upgrades are essential to meet this need. Technology to be considered for upgrades are video conferencing, displays, computers. Useful Life Project Name EOC Video/Computer Technology Category Technology Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$100,000 Dept Scoring 46 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 100,000100,000Vehicles and Equipment 100,000 100,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 100,000100,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 100,000 100,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 177 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Communications and Technol20192023thru Contact Ryan Browning Description Data storage needs are constantly increasing. We have seen large growth in the areas of building security cameras, police squad car and interview cameras and server backups. Over the next three years, we expect even more growth in the areas of GIS and possible police body cameras. To meet these demands, we will invest in additional network storage. The storage purchases will be targeted at both primary storage as well as backup storage with lower requirements. Project #17-163 Justification The I.T. Division maintains a server and storage system that is the foundation of nearly every I.T. system in use at the City of Edina. These systems often support the strategic initiatives requested by the City Council and Executive Leadership. Our storage needs are increasing each year due to existing systems expanding and the addition of new systems. Useful Life Project Name City of Edina Network Storage Category Technology Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$50,000 Dept Scoring 50 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Vehicles and Equipment 50,000 50,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000Construction Fund: Available Funding 50,000 50,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 178 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Finance20192023thru Contact Don Uram Description Acquistion of an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system - an industry term for a software system that provides, at a minimum, core financial functionality (general ledger, budgeting, accounts payroll, accounts receivable, purchasing), but can also include additional functionality, such as utility billing, community development, HR, and more. Includes HRIS project previously submitted under 17-192. Project #18-001 Justification The City’s current environment includes Oracle’s JD Edwards Enterprise One Suite for Finance, Payroll, and Workforce Management, Apprize for Benefit Enrollment, Tungsten for Accounts Payable, CIS for Utility Billing, and Hubble for Reporting and Budgeting . Additionally, the City uses a 3rd party application for Applicant Tracking and Onboarding called NeoGov, which is entirely web-based. An integrated ERP system would result in City-wide improved efficiency. Useful Life Project Name ERP System Category Technology Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,070,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 500,000300,000 200,000Software 500,000200,000 300,000Installation/Maintenance 500,000 500,000 1,000,000Total Prior 70,000 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,000,000500,000 500,000General Fund 500,000 500,000 1,000,000Total Prior 70,000 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 179 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Fire20192023thru Contact Dave Fischer Description Upgrade or replace existing electronic plan review software/hardware. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Minimizing the need for and use of paper will have significant environmental benefits. Project #19-503 Justification In 2015, the City moved in the direction of paperless plan review process. This upgrade would continue the paperless strategy. Useful Life Project Name Plan Review Software Category Technology Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$210,000 Dept Scoring 38 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 210,000210,000Software 210,000 210,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 210,000210,000Construction Fund: Equipment Levy 210,000 210,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 180 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description Extend fiber network from 70th St. W./Cornelia Dr. to Lift Station #6 (4400 72nd St. W.) and Water Treatment Plant #3 (7636 Parklawn Ave). This extension of the fiber network would increase system reliability. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Fiber expansion would eliminate the use of current radio communication, lessening electrical load. Project #19-906 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply and reliable sanitary sewer service. Expansion of existing fiber network allows for realtime monitoring and control of utility assets. Useful Life Project Name Fiber Installation, LS #6 and WTP #3 Category Technology Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$120,000 Dept Scoring 28 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Installation/Maintenance 120,000 120,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 60,00060,000Utility Fund: Sewer 60,00060,000Utility Fund: Water 120,000 120,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 181 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Dave Goergen Description Extend fiber network to Water Treatment Plant #4 (6721 2nd St.). ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Fiber expansion would eliminate the use of current radio communication, lessening electrical load. Project #19-907 Justification Our Vision Edina mission statement is to provide effective and valued public services and to maintain a sound public infrastructure. Specifically, the Comprehensive Plan identifies a goal to Provide the City’s water customers with safe, reliable, high quality potable water supply and reliable sanitary sewer service. Expansion of existing fiber network allows for realtime monitoring and control of utility assets. Useful Life Project Name Fiber Installation, WTP #4 Category Technology Type New Total Project Cost:$180,000 Dept Scoring 28 Status Active Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 180,000180,000Installation/Maintenance 180,000 180,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 90,00090,000Utility Fund: Sewer 90,00090,000Utility Fund: Water 180,000 180,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 182 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Buildings 15-049 930,000930,000Lewis Park Shelter Building Replacement 15-050 970,000970,000Highlands Park Shelter Building Replacement 15-051 890,000890,000Strachauer Park Shelter Building Replacement 15-057 50,00050,000Braemar Golf Administrative Office Renovation 15-069 81,00081,000Edinborough Park Track Air Conditioning 15-084 35,00035,000Braemar Arena Rubber Floor Replacement 17-004 100,000100,000Centennial Lakes Remodel Pavilion Concessions Area 17-031 200,000200,000Braemar Golf Clubhouse Lower Level 17-046 42,50042,500Edinborough Park Pool Lighting System Upgrade 17-048 71,00071,000Edinborough Park Track Floor Replacement 17-190 A 1,000,0001,000,000City Hall Blding Security & Efficiency - Phase II 19-702 70,00070,000Aquatic Center - Replacement Shade Structures 19-720 52,00052,000Edinborough Park - Replace Great Hall Flooring 19-740 95,00095,000Backyard Landscaping 19-741 120,000120,000Windows in East and South Arenas 19-743 60,00060,000Arena Entrance Sign 19-744 40,00040,000Gabion Seating Replacement 19-746 40,00040,000Office Remodel 19-750 100,000100,000Dome LED Lights 19-751 120,000120,000Dome Storage Facility Expansion 19-752 110,000110,000Remodel Dome Vehicle Air Lock 19-920 2,051,679112,600 1,487,944 451,135City Hall Facility Improvements 19-921 283,700283,700Public Works Facility Improvements 19-922 A 796,900616,400 180,500Fire Station 1 Facility Improv - Phase II 19-923 316,70044,500 272,200Fire Station 2 Facility Improvements 19-927 419,62575,253 46,450 226,114 31,775 40,033Art Center Facility Improvements 19-928 12,580,2692,554,810 8,463,344 1,562,115Braemar Arena Facility Improvements 19-929 1,269,886371,467 31,460 615,404 251,555Braemar Golf Facility Improvements 19-930 212,38765,729 121,658 25,000Centennial Lakes Facility Improvements 19-931 37,54937,549Cornelia Park Facility Improvements 19-932 57,14517,222 39,923Courtney Fields Campus Facility Improvements 19-933 136,22089,842 8,385 37,993Creek Valley Park Facility Improvements 19-934 6,741,1055,323,441 97,229 1,261,215 59,220Edinborough Park Facility Improvements 19-935 1,118,091240,524 281,720 46,538 525,035 24,274Senior Center Facility Improvements 19-936 265,64888,123 177,525Grange Cahill/ Tupa Park Facility Improvements 19-937 256,626104,782 151,844Aquatic Center Facility Improvements 19-939 137,166137,166Lewis Park Facility Improvement 19-942 426,206155,000 271,206Arnenson Acres Park Facility Improvements 19-944 37,54937,549Todd Park Facility Improvements 19-945 40,97740,977Van Valkenburg Park Facility Improvements 19-946 39,31439,314Walnut Ridge Park Facility Improvements 32,401,2429,779,237 2,638,421 14,289,245 4,380,998 1,313,341Buildings Total Equipment and Vehicles 15-016 100,000100,000Police SWAT Vehicle Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 183 Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # 15-060 115,00056,000 59,000Braemar Golf Fairway Mowers Replacement 15-061 66,00032,000 34,000Braemar Golf Greens Mowers Replacement 15-063 48,00023,000 25,000Braemar Golf Heavy Duty Utility Vehicle 15-064 36,00036,000Braemar Golf Small Rough Mowers Replacement 15-089 72,00072,000Braemar Golf Large Rough Mower Replacement 17-028 155,000155,000Braemar Arena Zamboni 17-033 25,00025,000Braemar Golf Landscape Lighting Replacement 17-037 52,00052,000Braemar Golf Skidsteer Replacement 17-039 30,00030,000Centennial Lakes Vehicle Purchase 19-005 A 50,00025,000 25,000EV Infrastructure - Phase II 19-700 75,00075,000Aquatic Center - Electronic Signage 19-730 32,00032,000Braemar Golf Dome - Netting 19-742 80,00080,000Bobcat & Attachments 19-747 25,50025,500Security Cameras 19-803 95,00095,000Dispatch Consoles/Furniture 19-804 205,416205,416Emergency Rescue Vehicle 1,261,916503,416 365,500 298,000 95,000Equipment and Vehicles Total Land 19-200 150,000150,000Cahill Industrial Park - Area Plan 150,000150,000Land Total Parks 15-032 175,000175,000Wooddale Park Playground Equipment 17-040 43,80043,800Edinborough Park Adventure Peak Renovation 17-044 77,00077,000Braemar Golf Patio Furniture 17-139 125,000125,000Birchcrest Park Playground Replacement 17-142 55,00055,000Courtney Fields Irrigation 17-143 40,00040,000Creek Valley Irrigation 17-144 100,000100,000Fox Meadow Park Playground Equipment 17-145 30,00030,000Garden Park Irrigation 17-148 175,000175,000Lewis Park Playground Replacement 17-180 125,000125,000Strachauer Park Playground Replacement 17-182 125,000125,000Todd Park Playground Equipment 17-183 40,00040,000Van Valkenburg Irrigation 17-185 125,000125,000Walnut Ridge Park Playground Replacement 17-186 45,00045,000Weber Park Irrigation System 17-187 90,00090,000Weber Woods Dog Park Fencing & Parking Lot 19-762 125,000125,000Highlands Park Playground Replacement 19-765 2,200,0002,200,000Braemar Park Improvements 19-766 13,700,00013,700,000Fred Richards Park Renovation - Phase II 17,395,8002,452,000 13,743,800 495,000 320,000 385,000Parks Total Technology 15-211 150,00030,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Electronic Document Management 17-042 35,00035,000Edinborough Park Automation for Roof Top Units 19-801 30,00030,000Automated Secure Alarm Protocol 215,00030,000 60,000 65,000 30,000 30,000Technology Total GRAND TOTAL 51,423,95812,914,653 16,807,721 15,147,245 4,825,998 1,728,341 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 184 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Buildings 15-049 930,000930,000Lewis Park Shelter Building Replacement 15-050 970,000970,000Highlands Park Shelter Building Replacement 15-051 890,000890,000Strachauer Park Shelter Building Replacement 15-057 50,00050,000Braemar Golf Administrative Office Renovation 15-069 81,00081,000Edinborough Park Track Air Conditioning 15-084 35,00035,000Braemar Arena Rubber Floor Replacement 17-004 100,000100,000Centennial Lakes Remodel Pavilion Concessions Area 17-031 200,000200,000Braemar Golf Clubhouse Lower Level 17-046 42,50042,500Edinborough Park Pool Lighting System Upgrade 17-048 71,00071,000Edinborough Park Track Floor Replacement 17-190 A 1,000,0001,000,000City Hall Blding Security & Efficiency - Phase II 19-702 70,00070,000Aquatic Center - Replacement Shade Structures 19-720 52,00052,000Edinborough Park - Replace Great Hall Flooring 19-740 95,00095,000Backyard Landscaping 19-741 120,000120,000Windows in East and South Arenas 19-743 60,00060,000Arena Entrance Sign 19-744 40,00040,000Gabion Seating Replacement 19-746 40,00040,000Office Remodel 19-750 100,000100,000Dome LED Lights 19-751 120,000120,000Dome Storage Facility Expansion 19-752 110,000110,000Remodel Dome Vehicle Air Lock 19-920 2,051,679112,600 1,487,944 451,135City Hall Facility Improvements 19-921 283,700283,700Public Works Facility Improvements 19-922 A 796,900616,400 180,500Fire Station 1 Facility Improv - Phase II 19-923 316,70044,500 272,200Fire Station 2 Facility Improvements 19-927 419,62575,253 46,450 226,114 31,775 40,033Art Center Facility Improvements 19-928 12,580,2692,554,810 8,463,344 1,562,115Braemar Arena Facility Improvements 19-929 1,269,886371,467 31,460 615,404 251,555Braemar Golf Facility Improvements 19-930 212,38765,729 121,658 25,000Centennial Lakes Facility Improvements 19-931 37,54937,549Cornelia Park Facility Improvements 19-932 57,14517,222 39,923Courtney Fields Campus Facility Improvements 19-933 136,22089,842 8,385 37,993Creek Valley Park Facility Improvements 19-934 6,741,1055,323,441 97,229 1,261,215 59,220Edinborough Park Facility Improvements 19-935 1,118,091240,524 281,720 46,538 525,035 24,274Senior Center Facility Improvements 19-936 265,64888,123 177,525Grange Cahill/ Tupa Park Facility Improvements 19-937 256,626104,782 151,844Aquatic Center Facility Improvements 19-939 137,166137,166Lewis Park Facility Improvement 19-942 426,206155,000 271,206Arnenson Acres Park Facility Improvements 19-944 37,54937,549Todd Park Facility Improvements 19-945 40,97740,977Van Valkenburg Park Facility Improvements 19-946 39,31439,314Walnut Ridge Park Facility Improvements 32,401,2429,779,237 2,638,421 14,289,245 4,380,998 1,313,341Buildings Total GRAND TOTAL 32,401,2429,779,237 2,638,421 14,289,245 4,380,998 1,313,341 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 185 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Summary20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description In 2018, the City completed a three-year review process of 117 buildings to create a master replacement schedule for physical buildings, plumbing, HVAC and other mechanical systems, components, fixtures and equipment to optimize long-term financial resources and meet sustainability goals. The results of this evaluation are documented in the Asset & Energy Management (AEMP) report prepared by CR-BPS Inc. Building improvement projects submitted for the 2019-2023 CIP include maintenance identified through the new data collected. This program uses the Building Owners Manager s Association standards to schedule replacements for critical building envelope components the City has 88 buildings covered in this program with a value of $169,000,000 Types of components include the building foundations,superstructures, mechanicals and electrical systems, plumbing, roofing, flooring, window and door systems,up to 50 total components based on the buildings complexity and design. This summary includes the following projects: 19-921 - Public Works Facility Improvements 19-922 A - Fire Station 1 Facility Improvements (Phase II) 19-923 - Fire Station 2 Facility Improvements 19-927 - Art Center Facility Improvements 19-928 - Braemar Arena Facility Improvements 19-929 - Braemar Golf Facility Improvements 19-930 - Centennial Lakes Facility Improvements 19-931 - Cornelia Park Facility Improvements 19-932 - Courtney Fields Campus Facility Improvements 19-933 - Creek Valley Prk Facilty Improvements 19-934 - Edinborough Park Facilty Improvements 19-935 - Senior Center Facilty Improvements 19-936 - Grange Cahill/Tupa Park Facilty Improvements 19-937 - Aquatic Center Facilty Improvements 19-939 - Lewis Park Facilty Improvements 19-942 - Arnenson Acres Park Facilty Improvements 19-944 - Todd Park Park Facilty Improvements 19-945 - Van Valkenburg Park Facilty Improvements 19-946 - Walnut Ridge Park Facilty Improvements ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The City has adopted the carbon emissions reduction goal of 25% by 2025. Renewal of the exterior doors and lighting, and roofing, and gas unit heaters, and fire alarm,will keep our buildings safe and provide and increased airtightness which will increase our buildings heating efficiencies, cutting down on our energy consumption. Project #FI - Unfund Justification This is a part of our City Work plan to maintain optimum facility operations. Deferral of maintenance is always more expensive.The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” These projects follow the mission statement by providing effective and values public services and maintaining a sound public infrastructure to sustain and improve the high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Useful Life Project Name Summary of Facilities Improvements - Unfunded Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$26,835,720 Dept Scoring Summary Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 25,173,0639,250,637 789,921 11,911,301 2,877,863 343,341Installation/Maintenance 9,250,637 789,921 11,911,301 2,877,863 343,341 25,173,063Total Future 1,662,657 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 186 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Summary20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 25,173,0639,250,637 789,921 11,911,301 2,877,863 343,341Unfunded 9,250,637 789,921 11,911,301 2,877,863 343,341 25,173,063Total Future 1,662,657 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 187 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This project involves replacement of the Lewis Park shelter building with a more modern design similar to Countryside and Pamela Park. Lewis Park is a 21 acre community athletic field park and is one of the heaviest used parks year round in the system. Lewis also has one of the oldest playgrounds in the system. Suggested replacement for the playground is 2019 with a universal playground. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Replacing this building will upgrade the lighting and heating systems with more energy efficient equipment. Project #15-049 Justification The Lewis Park shelter building was designed and build in the 1970's and no longer meets resident's needs and expectations. A park building assessment was completed in conjunction with the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan and the shelter building was assessed to be in poor condition. The building requires extensive maintenance, is poorly insulated, and visually intimidating with no windows, and was recommended for scheduled replacement. It is often referred to as a "shack, bunker and bomb shelter" by residents in the community. The community has expressed an interest in having a shelter building that is more user friendly for social gatherings and meeting spaces on a year round basis, similar to the newer shelter building at Countryside and Pamela Park. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states, Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Lewis Park Shelter Building Replacement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$930,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 930,000930,000Construction 930,000 930,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 930,000930,000Unfunded 930,000 930,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 188 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This project involves replacement of the Highlands Park shelter building with a more modern design similar to Countryside and Pamela Park. Highlands Park is a 44 acre community athletic field park. Staff suggests completing a master plan of Highlands park in 2022 and replacing the shelter and playground in 2023. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Replacing this building will upgrade the lighting and heating systems with more energy efficient equipment. Project #15-050 Justification The Highlands Park shelter building was designed and build in the 1970's and no longer meets resident's needs and expectations. A park building assessment was completed in conjunction with the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan and the shelter building was assessed to be in poor condition. The building requires extensive maintenance, is poorly insulated, and visually intimidating with no windows, and was recommended for scheduled replacement. It is often referred to as a "shack, bunker and bomb shelter" by residents in the community. The community has expressed an interest in having a shelter building that is more user friendly for social gatherings and meeting spaces on a year round basis, similar to the newer shelter building at Countryside and Pamela Park. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states, Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Highlands Park Shelter Building Replacement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$970,000 Dept Scoring 43 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 970,000970,000Construction 970,000 970,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 970,000970,000Unfunded 970,000 970,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 189 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This project involves replacement of the Strachauer Park shelter building with a more modern design similar to Countryside and Pamela Park. Strauchauer Park is a 4.5 acre neighborhood park. Staff suggests completing a master plan of the park in 2020 and replacing both the shelter and playground in 2021. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Replacing this building will upgrade the lighting and heating systems with more energy efficient equipment. Project #15-051 Justification The Strachauer Park shelter building was designed and build in the 1970's and no longer meets resident's needs and expectations. A park building assessment was completed in conjunction with the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan and the shelter building was assessed to be in poor condition. The building requires extensive maintenance, is poorly insulated, and visually intimidating with no windows, and was recommended for scheduled replacement. It is often referred to as a "shack, bunker and bomb shelter" by residents in the community. The community has expressed an interest in having a shelter building that is more user friendly for social gatherings and meeting spaces on a year round basis, similar to the newer shelter building at Countryside and Pamela Park. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states, Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Strachauer Park Shelter Building Replacement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$890,000 Dept Scoring 43 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 890,000890,000Construction 890,000 890,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 890,000890,000Unfunded 890,000 890,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 190 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description Renovate existing Braemar Clubhouse administrative office area. The administrative office area is dated, in poor shape and has significant amounts of wasted space. The present configuration is not conducive to a productive work environment. A renovation would include office space, storage room and a conference room to be used by staff, 18 leagues and the public. Project #15-057 Justification Renovation is needed to keep facility up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Administrative Office Renovation Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$50,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00050,000Construction 50,000 50,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00050,000Unfunded 50,000 50,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 191 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Edinborough Park20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description This was submitted as a 2016 CIP, however it was unfunded. Add air conditioning to the track and exercise area. The useful life is anticipated to be 10 years. Adding air conditioning to the track area is vital to the keeping the exercise area relevant, attractive and safe for our Association Partners (ie: Corporate Center, Brookdale Senior Living, Residence Inn and Edinborough Townhome owners), Pool & Track members and daily users. As it is set-up right now, the track utilizes air flow from other parts of the Park, but it is not sufficient to properly cool the area in a consistent manner. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: We would search for an air conditioning system that offers the best energy efficiency ratings. Project #15-069 Justification When Edinborough Park was built more than 30 years ago, air conditioning was not installed in the track area. The track is surrounded by windows that cannot be opened. During the summer months temperatures can exceed 90 degrees. Air conditioning in an exercise area is a basic expectation of anyone working out indoors. As noted in Vision Edina one of the strategic actions is "The City should to continue to prioritize amenities that meet the needs of residents of all ages." Exercising at these temperatures can become a safety and health issue for anyone, especially senior citizens using the area. The addition of air conditioning to the track will make the facility a more appealing alternative for the community to enjoy year round. Useful Life Project Name Edinborough Park Track Air Conditioning Category Buildings Type New Total Project Cost:$81,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 81,00081,000Vehicles and Equipment 81,000 81,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 81,00081,000Unfunded 81,000 81,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 192 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description The East and South Arenas need new Rubber Flooring. The replacement would be in the main areas- lower tunnel corridors, locker rooms and players benches/penalty boxes. The rubber floor allows for players to walk throughout the lower level of the facility with their skates on. The rubber flooring throughout the South and East Arenas was installed in 1997. Previously the East Arena only lasted for 10 years and currently the flooring is 19 years old. The flooring for the West arena and locker rooms was replaced in 2010. The flooring is wearing out in high traffic areas and becomes difficult to clean with our floor scrubber. Project #15-084 Justification The restrooms inside of the locker rooms that had rubber flooring installed are currently not up to code as rubber is difficult to clean. This product should not have been allowed to be installed this way in 1997. We are currently patching spots that have worn through, the patched spots create a trip hazard as the patching raises the flooring. The recommendation is to replace the rubber flooring with tile that does align with city code. Useful Life Project Name Braemar Arena Rubber Floor Replacement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$35,000 Dept Scoring 15 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 35,00035,000Construction 35,000 35,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 35,00035,000Unfunded 35,000 35,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 193 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Centennial Lakes Park20192023thru Contact Tom Shirley Description The Concessions area of the Hughes Pavilion is adjacent to the main atrium and is used for the sale of concessions items and ice skate rentals during the winter season. In addition, this area is used by our beverage service for dispensing of beverages for the majority of our special event rentals. This area consists of numerous laminate storage cabinets, countertops and shelving units; all of which are now 25 years old and showing wear. This remodel would involve removing and replacing all of the existing cabinets and countertops with more durable,modern looking pieces. We would also replace the flooring to compliment the new look. Project #17-004 Justification The continual upkeep and renovation of the Hughes Pavilion is an important part of our special event rental program, where aesthetics play such a vital role in attracting customers. This remodel will help us in attracting and retaining building rental customers, especially wedding and reception clients, with it's more up to date look. Useful Life Project Name Centennial Lakes Remodel Pavilion Concessions Area Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$100,000 Dept Scoring 32 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 100,000100,000Construction 100,000 100,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 100,000100,000Unfunded 100,000 100,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 194 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description The Braemar Clubhouse Lower Level is presently under-utilized because of its floor plan as well as its condition. The layout for the restrooms, locker rooms and lounges are designed in a manner that does not promote utilization. Restrooms and shower facilities as well as the plumbing infrastructure need to be repaired and renovated. The lower level carpet is passed its useful lifespan and needs to be replaced. Furniture, tables and chairs are all dated and need to be replaced. Wallpaper is dated and needs to be replaced or painted. Project #17-031 Justification Renovation is needed to keep facility up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Clubhouse Lower Level Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$200,000 Dept Scoring 10 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 200,000200,000Construction 200,000 200,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 200,000200,000Unfunded 200,000 200,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 195 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Edinborough Park20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description Improve pool lighting to increase visibility and safety for guests. The ceiling of the pool area is open to the second floor track area and this creates difficulty lighting the pool area properly. The current lighting was installed in 1994 and consists of eighteen small square box lights located under the track, and on the outside perimeter of the pool, but they do not provide lighting to the center of the pool. The pool area does receive some natural light, but not enough to make a significant difference and definitely not during the evening. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Through this lighting system upgrade, there is potential to receive a rebate, reduce electrical costs and install longer lasting bulbs. Project #17-046 Justification The lighting in the pool is an important safety feature for everyone using the pool. Since we formalized our partnership with the Edina Swim Club in 2012, their staff spends approximately 25 hours/week in the pool area and they find the lighting conditions difficult. It is quite dim in certain areas. Improving the lighting would include hiring a lighting designer for this unique area and installing natatorium rated lights. Useful Life Project Name Edinborough Park Pool Lighting System Upgrade Category Buildings Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$42,500 Dept Scoring 20 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 2,5002,500Planning and Design 40,00040,000Construction 42,500 42,500Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 42,50042,500Unfunded 42,500 42,500Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 196 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Edinborough Park20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description This was an approved CIP in 2015 that was not completed. Replace the track floor with a similar rubber surface. The useful life is anticipated to be 20 years. The current track surface was installed nearly 30 years ago, when the facility opened in 1987. Project #17-048 Justification The Parks and Recreation Facilities and Services Needs Assessment Survey confirmed that having indoor exercise facilities and an indoor running/walking track is important to the residents of Edina. The track has experienced significant wear over the years. Portions of the track surface are wearing quite thin causing potential tripping hazards. The current surface is a deterrent to many people. The Marriott Residence Inn is one of our association partners that pays maintenance fees to us and they do not have exercise equipment or a swimming pool. Our agreement with them includes pool and track privileges for their guests and we must maintain it to a standard that they would be proud of too. To maximize the impact of this project, it should be coordinated with replacing the fitness equipment. Useful Life Project Name Edinborough Park Track Floor Replacement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$71,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 71,00071,000Construction 71,000 71,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 71,00071,000Unfunded 71,000 71,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 197 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Lisa Schaefer Description The current City Hall/Police Department facility opened at 2004 with a budget of $10.4 million. The single-building concept provided management and operational efficiencies for the City. The building was designed to be open and accessible to the public. Over a decade later, the building has served the City well. However, security and staffing needs have changed significantly since 2004. There is an opportunity to make some physical changes to the building in order to 1) improve security in public spaces, 2) increase efficiency of limited staff resources by combining some customer reception points, and 3) identify energy efficiency opportunities to meet sustainability goals and reduce operational utility bills, 4) allow more effective use of real estate by increasing workspace, meeting/training areas, and other flexible workspaces 5) make updates needed for legal compliance & wellness goals including improved nursing facilities and access to showers/fitness area for City Hall staff. ENVIRNMENTAL CONSIDERATION Construction renovations introduce the opportunity to make improvements to the facility for increased Sustainability and cost-efficiency. City Hall facility has one of the highest Energy Use Index (EUI) which means there is a large amount of energy used per square foot. Minnesota's B3 Benchmarking estimates there is potential for 2,607,000 kBtu annual energy savings and $64,000 annual energy savings at City Hall. Additionally, installing bike commuting amenities can have positive environmental impacts. Bike commuting over single vehicle occupancy commutes can decrease GHG emissions, improve air quality, and improve employee health. These new amenities will have an initial carbon footprint and some will have ongoing footprint and costs (ex: showers for commuters means more water use on site.) It will be important to design and install amenities in a sustainable manner so the overall footprint of these amenities remain positive to the environment. Project #17-190 A Justification This project advances several identified goals in the 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan, including: Budget Goal 1: Maintain Physical Assets and Infrastructure. A core objective of budget goal #1 is to replace and maintain at the most cost-effective time. Another objective is to reduce carbon footprint and energy costs through facility maintenance and capital improvements, specifically citing City Hall as a building with the highest Energy Use Index. Significant FFEs, including carpet, furniture etc are original to the building, and have been extended past its useful life. It makes sense to evaluate building use prior to re-investment. Budget Goal 2: Maintain Service-Levels that Best Need the Needs of the Community. Remodeling city hall would coincide with the object to ensure compliance with state statutes and city-code, and also to insure resources are matched to service-level requirements limited resources (money, equipment, and time) are deployed in an equitable manner. This project will allow more effective use of real estate and provide competitive compensation, benefits, and work-life balance to attract and retain the next generation of workers. Additionally, the City's Mission statement reads "Our mission is to provide effective and valued public service, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses." This project improves the safety of our staff and improves the efficiency of our operations. In addition, the renovations allow us to maximize the utility of our spaces in order to meet the needs of both our staff and residents in order to provide the high level of services that our residents demand. Another consideration in support of this project is implementing a Flexible Workplace Program. The Minnesota unemployment rate is the lowest it has been since 2000 so it is imperative that we are innovative in our solutions to ensure we continue to attract and hire quality talent. Offering a Flexible Workplace Program to include alternative work schedules, shared workspaces to maximize workspace occupancy, and telework helps supports work-life balance for current and prospective employees. In addition, major long-term construction projects negatively impact commute times. Given most employees live outside of Edina and commute time undoubtedly factors into employee satisfaction and work-life balance, implementing a Commuter Benefit Program complements a Flexible Workplace Program. Combined, these programs will allow us to remain competitive with surrounding cities and companies. Useful Life Project Name City Hall Blding Security & Efficiency - Phase II Category Buildings Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$1,000,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Pending Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 198 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Lisa Schaefer Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,000,0001,000,000Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,000,0001,000,000Unfunded 1,000,000 1,000,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 199 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Aquatic Center20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description The Aquatic Center has one large area trellis to provide shade for the guests using the main pool area. This trellis was installed in 2004 and is constructed of treated pine, with a synthetic black mesh cover across the top. The wood structure of the trellis is cracking, splitting, and warping as the pine is deteriorating. It is very dull and weathered. The existing trellis structure is 51' x 32' and accommodates approximately 45 chairs. On a normal day, we may have 1000-2500 visitors and providing shade is very important to them. We frequently hear from guests who want to enjoy the pool setting, yet don't want the direct exposure to the sun due to concerns of UV rays and skin cancer. Modern shade structures allow guests to enjoy the Aquatic Center more safely and comfortably. Adding two new shade structures would expand our shaded area and allow guests to enjoy the main pool area safely and comfortably. Project #19-702 Justification Since we are an older facility, we've taken purposeful steps to update and modernize the look of the Aquatic Center attractions to ensure we are competitive, relevant and innovative going forward. We need to continue that throughout the facility to make it more esthetically pleasing. The existing shade structure is becoming an eyesore and is not representative of what our guests expect. The new shade structures would be more durable with a frame lasting approximately 20 years, a shade fabric guaranteed to last 10 years and a wide variety of color options to brighten up the entire facility. Useful Life Project Name Aquatic Center - Replacement Shade Structures Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$70,000 Dept Scoring 31 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 40,00040,000Construction 30,00030,000Installation/Maintenance 70,000 70,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 70,00070,000Unfunded 70,000 70,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 200 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Edinborough Park20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description Each year Edinborough Park has more than 125,000 visitors. The Great Hall is a 60' X 90' multipurpose activity area located within the playpark side of Edinborough Park. It is a high volume, extremely active play area that offers large motor activities for children and parents. The Great Hall floor was renovated in 2008 and a rubberized floor was installed at that time. The rubber floor is starting to show wear and tear with some fractures and pits. Since Adventure Peak is a "socks only" environment, many visitors who also play in the Great Hall are often only wearing socks. As normal wear and tear on the floor increases, the likelihood of the floor surface becoming a hazard for those in socks also increases. Project #19-720 Justification The Great Hall plays a vital role in the overall guest experience at Edinborugh Park. It is a very large space where guests of all ages spend a considerable amount of time playing and observing their children. Not only is this an active play area, it also is a focal point for spectators in the Park and is important to the overall upkeep and rejuvenation of Edinborough Park. Children are often playing on the floor and when the integrity of the rubber flooring starts to deteriorate further it could become a safety issue and negatively affect the overall guest experience. Useful Life Project Name Edinborough Park - Replace Great Hall Flooring Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$52,000 Dept Scoring 36 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 52,00052,000Construction 52,000 52,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 52,00052,000Unfunded 52,000 52,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 201 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description When the Braemar backyard rink and field where constructed a planting area was included between the two facilities. The area is approximately 6' x 250'. This area originally contained various plantings and mulch. The runoff from the backyard roof has deteriorated the landscaping including killing some plantings and washing out the mulch. Staff has tried to mitigate the wash out by installing pea rock, black dirt and additional mulch. None of these solutions have worked. Material has continued to wash out and ends up going into the storm sewer and also exposes the irrigation pipes in this area. This proposal is to relandscape this area with more hardy plantings and material that will not wash out. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: As part of this plan, additional plantings will be added to replace and increase the amount of plant material in the current area. In addition, the material between the plantings will not wash out. Project #19-740 Justification The washout of material that then runs into the storm sewer creates a significant environmental issue as it ends up in local streams and wetlands. This practice goes against the City's environmental stewardship goals as outlined in the Vision Edina framework. Deferring this maintenance could also lead to additional work to the City storm sewer system due to clogs and debris. The damage caused by washout creates an area that is unattractive to our customers and citizens, reflects poorly on the City parks and is not the sound infrastructure that called for in the comprehensive plan. Useful Life Project Name Backyard Landscaping Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$95,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 95,00095,000Installation/Maintenance 95,000 95,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 95,00095,000Unfunded 95,000 95,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 202 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description Both the East and South Arenas have large windows opposite the seating area. These windows bring in much natural light during the day. The windows are original to the arenas and have begun to leak. This leaking has attributed to water stains on the walls, deterioration of interior finishes and have very limited insulation value. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The current windows are lacking in energy efficiency. In addition, leaks around the sides of the windows are not only allowing moisture to enter but warm/cold air to enter and exit the building. Project #19-741 Justification Our current windows no longer meet the Edina standards for sound public infrastructure and environmental stewardship. Both of these are priorities identified in Vision Edina. Useful Life Project Name Windows in East and South Arenas Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$120,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Installation/Maintenance 120,000 120,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 120,000120,000Unfunded 120,000 120,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 203 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description Braemar Arena and Field currently have one wood entrance sign for each facility. This proposal is to replace the arena entrance sign with an electronic sign. Project #19-743 Justification The current sign near the arena is small and does not provide a welcoming atmosphere to the arena. Many customers are confused on entry points to the various facilities in Braemar Park including Courtney Fields, Braemar Field, Braemar Arena and Braemar Golf Dome. Useful Life Project Name Arena Entrance Sign Category Buildings Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$60,000 Dept Scoring 5 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 60,00060,000Installation/Maintenance 60,000 60,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 60,00060,000Unfunded 60,000 60,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 204 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description This is a proposal for the replacement of the wood seating that is on the gabions at the back yard rink seating area and also near the dome lobby building entrance. While the current seating is only 5 years old it has seen considerable deterioration and damage. Boards are coming unscrewed due to shrinkage, others have split and many have lost connection to the rock gabions beneath them making for an unstable seating surface. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: We believe the current material to be ipe wood. Staff is suggesting a recycled material be used. This should not only improve maintenance and appearance but also help the city meet its sustainability goals. Project #19-744 Justification Staff has attempted to repair the current seating on multiple occasions with limited success. Contractors have suggested replacement versus repair as a solution to the ongoing issues. The current state of repair reflects poorly on the City infrastructure and is borderline dangerous in areas. Useful Life Project Name Gabion Seating Replacement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$40,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 40,00040,000Construction 40,000 40,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 40,00040,000Unfunded 40,000 40,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 205 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description Remodel the existing Braemar Arena office area. The office area is dated, and its configuration is not conducive to a productive work environment. A renovation would include office space, storage areas, and a conference room to be used by staff, customers and the public. Project #19-746 Justification The current office environment is noisy and ergonomically challenged. Additionally, the configuration leads to many interruptions and unannounced visitors. Staff is challenged with work stations that do not meet ergonomic needs. Useful Life Project Name Office Remodel Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$40,000 Dept Scoring 15 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 400400Planning and Design 39,60039,600Construction 40,000 40,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 40,00040,000Unfunded 40,000 40,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 206 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description This project is for the replacement of the indoor dome lights that hang from the ceiling. The light are currently HID lamps and are burning out on a regular basis. There are 110 lights that would be replaced. The project would be bid in two ways: 1) replacement of bulbs and ballast. 2) Total fixture replacement. We have found in previous projects that total fixture replacement comes in close to bulb and ballast replacement in cost. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a "green" project. LED lighting is more sustainable, last longer and costs less than our current lighting. In addition, we believe that we can cut down on the number of actual fixtures thus further reducing costs. Project #19-750 Justification A move to LED lights would advance the City's goal of environmental stewardship and sustainable infrastructure. Replacement of bulbs and ballast cost nearly $400 for each fixture. We need to do this in approximately 12 fixtures per year. This ongoing replacement cost along with the cost of electricity are reasons we would like to transition to LED. Useful Life Project Name Dome LED Lights Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$100,000 Dept Scoring 38 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 100,000100,000Installation/Maintenance 100,000 100,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 100,000100,000Unfunded 100,000 100,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 207 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description This project proposes an 16' expansion to the current dome storage facility. This is the building to the east of the field which stores the dome fabric, doors, lights, insulation and installation materials when the dome is down. Project #19-751 Justification The current building is too small for our storage needs. When originally built, the plans did not take into account for the insulation rolls that are used in the dome. This results in a reduction of 10' of space that could be used for other purposes. When the dome is fully stored we have no room for other equipment including the storage crates for the futsal court, our Bobcat, snow removal equipment and outdoor grounds keeping equipment. This equipment is either stored outdoors or in the cold storage building. Useful Life Project Name Dome Storage Facility Expansion Category Buildings Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$120,000 Dept Scoring 33 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 120,000120,000Construction 120,000 120,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 120,000120,000Unfunded 120,000 120,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 208 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description This proposal is to replace the current dome vehicle air lock (VAL) with a permanent structure that is slightly larger and weather proof.. The current VAL was put in place when the dome was built. The construction of the existing VAL is of poor quality. Project #19-752 Justification The construction of the VAL is poor. Construction materials include plastic sides and a membrane roof. We have water infiltration on the roof, sides and base. There is no footing on the building and metal framing sits flush on the ground. This allows for rust on the members and water to run under them and into the building. The building will also shift depending on the pressure in the dome. This causes stress between the building and the dome itself which can lead to tears in the dome fabric. This shift has also caused binding of the garage doors which then have trouble opening and closing. Completion of this project would meet the goal of sound public infrasturcture as outlined in the comprehensive plan. Useful Life Project Name Remodel Dome Vehicle Air Lock Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$110,000 Dept Scoring 28 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 110,000110,000Installation/Maintenance 110,000 110,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 110,000110,000Unfunded 110,000 110,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 209 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description We have evaluated and rated each component of each building envelope within this program, and perform needed repairs to stretch the lifespan to its maximum. We expect to see an increase in maintenance needs and costs as buildings age. We seek to avoid unnecessary interruptions in building operations and programming due to breakdowns of critical components failure and unreliability. We recommend replacing: 2019 Exterior stone cleaning, condenser unit replacement 2021 Interior signage, painting, wall paper, vct flooring, carpeting, sealed concrete, sump pump, gas water heaters, PA system, fire alarm system, security system, local area network (LAN), emergency light and power 2022 Light fixtures 2024 Roofing, Acoustical tile, ceiling insulation, water coolers, exhaust system, return air ducts and fans, IT room cooling system, metal lockers in PD. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The condenser units listed in 2019 will cause the equipment to operate at the highest efficiency. The condenser units are an integral part of the HVAC system that heats and cools the entire City Hall. The City Hall has adopted the carbon emissions reduction goal of 25 % by 2015. renewal of the compressor part of the HVAC system will keep our equipment operating at its highest efficiency. The HVAC system at City Hall runs 24 hours a day 7 days a week,putting above normal operational loads on the entire system, replacing the condenser units will replace a critical part of the cooling system,in lieu of a entire system replacement. Project #19-920 Justification As outlined in Vision Edina it is the mission of the City Council to provide effective and valued public services and maintain a sound public infrastructure. This is part of our City Work Plan to maintain optimum facility operations. Deferral of maintenance is always more expensive. We used the Building Owners Managers Association(BOMA) standards to schedule replacements for critical building envelope components the City has 88 buildings covered in this program with a value of $169,000,000 Types of components include the building foundations,superstructures, mechanicals and electrical systems, plumbing, roofing, flooring, window and door systems,up to 50 total components based on the buildings complexity and design. Useful Life Project Name City Hall Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$4,775,668 Dept Scoring 26 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,487,9441,487,944Construction 563,735112,600 451,135Installation/Maintenance 112,600 1,487,944 451,135 2,051,679Total Future 2,723,989 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 2,051,679112,600 1,487,944 451,135Unfunded 112,600 1,487,944 451,135 2,051,679Total Future 2,723,989 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 210 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2020 - Painting, carpets, concrete sealing 2023 - Partitions,concrete paint and ceiling paint 2024 - Water heaters Project #19-921 Justification Refer to Summary of Facility Improvements - Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Public Works Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$283,700 Dept Scoring 24 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 283,700283,700Installation/Maintenance 283,700 283,700Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 283,700283,700Unfunded 283,700 283,700Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 211 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Kitchen, casework, kitchen equipment, Epoxy flooring, basement ventilation addition, load bank breaker 2021- Boiler system, controls, fire alarm system, security system, emergency lights, water heater, VCT flooring, carpet 2023 - Sport matting, exterior overhead doors Project #19-922 A Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Fire Station 1 Facility Improv - Phase II Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$796,900 Dept Scoring 26 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 796,900616,400 180,500Installation/Maintenance 616,400 180,500 796,900Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 796,900616,400 180,500Unfunded 616,400 180,500 796,900Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 212 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Fire alarm system, lighting fixtures 2021- Painting, roofing, exhaust, gas furnace, gas infared heat, controls, security, kitchen equipment, generator, restroom fixtures Project #19-923 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements - Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Fire Station 2 Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$316,700 Dept Scoring 25 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 316,70044,500 272,200Installation/Maintenance 44,500 272,200 316,700Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 316,70044,500 272,200Unfunded 44,500 272,200 316,700Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 213 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Carpet, tile, restroom fixtures, exhaust system, kitchen, plumbing, case work 2020 - Gas furnace 2021- Skylights, interior doors, perimeter heat, fume hood exhaust system, electrical service system, lighting, stationary art equipment 2022 - Floor tile 2023 - Boiler system Project #19-927 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Art Center Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$419,625 Dept Scoring 27 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 419,62575,253 46,450 226,114 31,775 40,033Construction 75,253 46,450 226,114 31,775 40,033 419,625Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 419,62575,253 46,450 226,114 31,775 40,033Unfunded 75,253 46,450 226,114 31,775 40,033 419,625Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 214 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Makeup air unit/west, package units/south, lighting fixtures W/E/S, entire fire alarm system, exterior doors E, interior doors E, paint wall E/S/W, wall tile W/E, floor tile W/E, ceiling S/E/W, restroom fixtures/E, MAU/E, infared heat/S 2021- Interior doors(65), Ceiling paint S, water dist E, water dist/W, exhaust/E/W/S, perimeter heat/W, controls all, electric distribution feeder, switchgear W/E/S, scoreboard (05), telephone system all, security all, emergency light and power all,casework S/W, ice rink E/S/W, ice equip W/S, Fixed seating E/W 2022 - epdm roofing /S, restroom accessibility improvements,varied, toilet partitions varied, vinyl floor /Hornets, Q tile/S, Elevator /E, rest rooms/S, sanitary /W, MAU/S 2024 - Exit signs all, interior hollow metal door E, POS system Project #19-928 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Braemar Arena Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$12,904,393 Dept Scoring 29 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 12,580,2692,554,810 8,463,344 1,562,115Construction 2,554,810 8,463,344 1,562,115 12,580,269Total Future 324,124 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 12,580,2692,554,810 8,463,344 1,562,115Unfunded 2,554,810 8,463,344 1,562,115 12,580,269Total Future 324,124 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 215 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Boiler, Air handling unit, pnuematic controls, exterior and interior doors, concrete sealing 2020 - Security system 2021 - Exterior doors, overhead doors, ceiling tile system, water piping, water heater, exhaust system(cart storage), controls (pro shop), lockers, alum clad windows, water distribution 2022 - Exterior doors, electric service, range equip, makeup air unit, unit heater Project #19-929 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,593,876 Dept Scoring 24 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,269,886371,467 31,460 615,404 251,555Construction 371,467 31,460 615,404 251,555 1,269,886Total Future 323,990 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,269,886371,467 31,460 615,404 251,555Unfunded 371,467 31,460 615,404 251,555 1,269,886Total Future 323,990 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 216 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Kitchen plumbing, kitchen casework 2021- Carpet, exhaust, make up air, fire alarm system 2022 - Boat rental building replacement Project #19-930 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Centennial Lakes Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$212,387 Dept Scoring 23 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 212,38765,729 121,658 25,000Construction 65,729 121,658 25,000 212,387Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 212,38765,729 121,658 25,000Unfunded 65,729 121,658 25,000 212,387Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 217 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2022 - Wooden panel system replacement Project #19-931 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Cornelia Park Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$37,549 Dept Scoring 22 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 37,54937,549Construction 37,549 37,549Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 37,54937,549Unfunded 37,549 37,549Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 218 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2021- Roofing 2022 - Plumbing, paint, lighting Project #19-932 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Courtney Fields Campus Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$57,145 Dept Scoring 22 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 57,14517,222 39,923Construction 17,222 39,923 57,145Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 57,14517,222 39,923Unfunded 17,222 39,923 57,145Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 219 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Rubber tile 2022 - Roofing Project #19-933 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Creek Valley Park Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$204,867 Dept Scoring 22 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 136,22089,842 8,385 37,993Construction 89,842 8,385 37,993 136,220Total Future 68,647 Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 136,22089,842 8,385 37,993Unfunded 89,842 8,385 37,993 136,220Total Future 68,647 Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 220 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Restroom plumbing, roofing, ceiling tile, window system, roofing, painting, carpets, tile floor and wall tile, rubber flooring, water drainage, exhaust system, gas package unit, rooftop units, metal panels, locker room showers, heaters, controls, lockers, stage equipment, indoor track, access ladder 2020 - Emergency lights 2021- Elevator, plumbing for eyewash station, water heater, sprinkler system, electrical system, fire system 2023 - Painting, VCT tile, water heater, emergency lights Project #19-934 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Edinborough Park Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$6,741,105 Dept Scoring 26 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 6,741,1055,323,441 97,229 1,261,215 59,220Construction 5,323,441 97,229 1,261,215 59,220 6,741,105Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 6,741,1055,323,441 97,229 1,261,215 59,220Unfunded 5,323,441 97,229 1,261,215 59,220 6,741,105Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 221 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - VCT flooring, carpet, emergency light and power, pa system, telephone, kitchen equipment 2020 - Boiler replacement, heating system 2021 - Painting 2022 - Roofing, plumbing, exhaust, controls, lighting, fire alarm 2023 - Coiling door Project #19-935 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Senior Center Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$1,118,091 Dept Scoring 27 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,118,091240,524 281,720 46,538 525,035 24,274Construction 240,524 281,720 46,538 525,035 24,274 1,118,091Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 1,118,091240,524 281,720 46,538 525,035 24,274Unfunded 240,524 281,720 46,538 525,035 24,274 1,118,091Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 222 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Windows, siding, interior doors in Cahill building 2022 - Interior doors at Grange building, electrical service, lighting, outer wall structure Project #19-936 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Grange Cahill/ Tupa Park Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$265,648 Dept Scoring 21 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 265,64888,123 177,525Construction 88,123 177,525 265,648Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 265,64888,123 177,525Unfunded 88,123 177,525 265,648Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 223 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Plumbing, tile, partitions, ceramic tile, ceiling tile 2022 - Painting, exhaust, lighting, kitchen equipment Project #19-937 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Aquatic Center Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$256,626 Dept Scoring 23 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 256,626104,782 151,844Construction 104,782 151,844 256,626Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 256,626104,782 151,844Unfunded 104,782 151,844 256,626Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 224 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Exterior doors,wooden panel system replacement, rubber floor tile Project #19-939 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Lewis Park Facility Improvement Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$137,166 Dept Scoring 22 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 137,166137,166Construction 137,166 137,166Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 137,166137,166Unfunded 137,166 137,166Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 225 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2019 - Kitchen cabinets and remodel, exterior doors, gas furnace, swinging doors, painting, carpeting 2021 - Painting, wall, fire alarm system, electrical service system, lighting, roofing system, wooden walls, casework Project #19-942 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Arnenson Acres Park Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$426,206 Dept Scoring 26 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 426,206155,000 271,206Construction 155,000 271,206 426,206Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 426,206155,000 271,206Unfunded 155,000 271,206 426,206Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 226 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2022 - Wooden wall panels Project #19-944 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Todd Park Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$37,549 Dept Scoring 21 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 37,54937,549Construction 37,549 37,549Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 37,54937,549Unfunded 37,549 37,549Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 227 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2020 - Aluminum clad windows, exterior doors Project #19-945 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Van Valkenburg Park Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$40,977 Dept Scoring 22 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 40,97740,977Construction 40,977 40,977Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 40,97740,977Unfunded 40,977 40,977Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 228 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Public Works20192023thru Contact Tim Barnes Description As outlined in the Asset & Energy Management report, recommended facility improvements inlcude: 2023 - Wooden wall panels Project #19-946 Justification Refer to Summary of Facilities Improvements – Unfunded. Useful Life Project Name Walnut Ridge Park Facility Improvements Category Buildings Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$39,314 Dept Scoring 21 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 39,31439,314Construction 39,314 39,314Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 39,31439,314Unfunded 39,314 39,314Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 229 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Equipment and Vehicles 15-016 100,000100,000Police SWAT Vehicle 15-060 115,00056,000 59,000Braemar Golf Fairway Mowers Replacement 15-061 66,00032,000 34,000Braemar Golf Greens Mowers Replacement 15-063 48,00023,000 25,000Braemar Golf Heavy Duty Utility Vehicle 15-064 36,00036,000Braemar Golf Small Rough Mowers Replacement 15-089 72,00072,000Braemar Golf Large Rough Mower Replacement 17-028 155,000155,000Braemar Arena Zamboni 17-033 25,00025,000Braemar Golf Landscape Lighting Replacement 17-037 52,00052,000Braemar Golf Skidsteer Replacement 17-039 30,00030,000Centennial Lakes Vehicle Purchase 19-005 A 50,00025,000 25,000EV Infrastructure - Phase II 19-700 75,00075,000Aquatic Center - Electronic Signage 19-730 32,00032,000Braemar Golf Dome - Netting 19-742 80,00080,000Bobcat & Attachments 19-747 25,50025,500Security Cameras 19-803 95,00095,000Dispatch Consoles/Furniture 19-804 205,416205,416Emergency Rescue Vehicle 1,261,916503,416 365,500 298,000 95,000Equipment and Vehicles Total GRAND TOTAL 1,261,916503,416 365,500 298,000 95,000 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 230 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dave Nelson Description Project Description: To replace an aging, 20 year old vehicle (a 1998 re-purposed ambulance) that is used to transport specialty equipment and SWAT personnel to critical incidents and SWAT trainings in Edina and surrounding Consortium Cities (Hopkins, Minnetonka, Eden Prairie and St. Louis Park). It also acts as a temporary mobile command post until we call upon a Consortium City. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The current vehicle has a 21 year old diesel emission system. If this vehicle gets replaced with a 2007 or newer model, it will be equipped with a DPF (Diesel Particulate Filtering system) per federal regulations that will remove 85% or more of diesel soot. Moreover, a newer engine would reduce emissions and have control devices to decrease sulfur emission levels along with the capability to maximize the benefits of Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel. Lastly, we would research the feasibility of switching to a gasoline vehicle with better environmental considerations and lower emissions. Project #15-016 Justification This vehicle is used to transport SWAT Officers and their specialty equipment to manage critical incidents and attend monthly trainings. The vehicle was 11 years old when urchased in 2009. In 2019 the vehicle will be 21 years old. The vehicle had originally been used as an ambulance and the police department had it converted for police service. We modified the interior for storage needs, gun lockers and limited command post capabilities. The truck has worked at a basic functional level as a police vehicle, but a truly dedicated vehicle designed from the frame up for police service, storage, transport and a mobile command post would better serve the police department and the city. When the current vehicle is loaded with officers and all of the necessary equipment, the suspension is at capacity and it is a safety concern responding to critical incidents. The reliability of the vehicle is a concern and the many safety features it is lacking due to it being 20 years old. The SWAT team could not provide the necessary security, management of or life safety tactics if this vehicle could not arrive at the critical incident with their equipment or officers. We are proposing to design and purchase a dedicated vehicle for personnel transport, equipment and mobile command post for the 14 member SWAT team. When this vehicle is purchased and specifically built/designed as a SWAT truck, unlike the ambulance we have now, I foresee a lifespan of 20 years or more. Useful Life Project Name Police SWAT Vehicle Category Equipment and Vehicles Type New Total Project Cost:$100,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 100,000100,000Vehicles and Equipment 100,000 100,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 100,000100,000Unfunded 100,000 100,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 231 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description Replace fairway mower. Fairway mowers are critical to the overall golf operation and need to be replaced on regularly scheduled basis. As these machines age they require more maintenance and develop hydraulic oil leaks which is detrimental to the turf. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Environmental/greener alternatives have been considered and at this point are cost prohibitive and are not proven to be reliable. Project #15-060 Justification Replacement needed to keep maintenance fleet in working condition and up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Fairway Mowers Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$115,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 115,00056,000 59,000Vehicles and Equipment 56,000 59,000 115,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 115,00056,000 59,000Unfunded 56,000 59,000 115,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 232 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description Replace greens mower. Greens mowers are critical to the overall golf operation and need to be replaced on regularly scheduled basis. As these machines age they require more maintenance and develop hydraulic oil leaks which is detrimental to the turf. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Environmental/greener alternatives have been considered and at this point are cost prohibitive and not proven to be reliable. Project #15-061 Justification Replacement needed to keep maintenance fleet in working condition and up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Greens Mowers Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$66,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 66,00032,000 34,000Vehicles and Equipment 32,000 34,000 66,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 66,00032,000 34,000Unfunded 32,000 34,000 66,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 233 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description Replace 2 heavy duty utility vehicles at Braemar in 2019 and 2021. The trade vehicles were purchased in 2005 making them 15 and 16 years old at the time of purchase. These heavy duty vehicles are used for hauling and dumping larger loads of materials on the golf course. They are a small version of a dump truck that can maneuver around the golf course without harming the turfgrass. They typically haul sand for the bunkers, soil for construction projects and heavy debris from trees. These activities help us improve the course conditions. As these vehicles continue to age, they require more frequent repair and are not available for the grounds crew. This also reduces the time that the mechanic can spend on the grounds helping to improve course conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Environmental/greener alternatives have been considered and at this point are cost prohibitive and are not proven to be reliable. Project #15-063 Justification Replacement needed to keep maintenance fleet in working condition and up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Heavy Duty Utility Vehicle Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$48,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 48,00023,000 25,000Vehicles and Equipment 23,000 25,000 48,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 48,00023,000 25,000Unfunded 23,000 25,000 48,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 234 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description Replace small rough mower. Rough mowers are critical to the overall golf operation and need to be replaced on regularly scheduled basis. As these machines age they require more maintenance and develop hydraulic oil leaks which is detrimental to the turf. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Replace small rough mower. Rough mowers are critical to the overall golf operation and need to be replaced on regularly scheduled basis. As these machines age they require more maintenance and develop hydraulic oil leaks which is detrimental to the turf. Project #15-064 Justification Replacement needed to keep maintenance fleet in working condition and up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Small Rough Mowers Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$36,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 36,00036,000Vehicles and Equipment 36,000 36,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 36,00036,000Unfunded 36,000 36,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 235 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description Replace large rough mower. Rough mowers are critical to the overall golf operation and need to be replaced on regularly scheduled basis. As these machines age they require more maintenance and develop hydraulic oil leaks which is detrimental to the turf. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Environmental/greener alternatives have been considered and at this point are cost prohibitive and are not proven to be reliable. Project #15-089 Justification Replacement needed to keep maintenance fleet in working condition and up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Large Rough Mower Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$72,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 72,00072,000Vehicles and Equipment 72,000 72,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 72,00072,000Unfunded 72,000 72,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 236 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description The desired useful life of a Zamboni is 10,000 hours, which equates to about 10 years. We have historically held on to Zamboni’s for 13-17 years. With the replacement of this Zamboni the machines we use on a daily basis will be 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2021. The Zamboni this would replace is a 2001. While this is our back up machine, it is also used during the winter months while the 2014 resurfaces the backyard rink. After this machine is replaced we would need another one starting in 2025. Project #17-028 Justification Zamboni's are a necessity to ice arena operations. When a Zamboni ages you will start to see imperfections in the ice due to the machine not operating properly. During the winter months and the Backyard Rink is in operation we use all four Zamboni's, therefore it is very important that all machines are in proper working condition. Useful Life Project Name Braemar Arena Zamboni Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$155,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 155,000155,000Construction 155,000 155,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 155,000155,000Unfunded 155,000 155,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 237 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description Upgrade and enhance the exterior lighting along the new patio and sidewalk at the front of Braemar clubhouse. New lighting would improve safety, save energy and enhance the new patio seating area in front of "Tin Fish". ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This project includes replacing 9 existing HID bollard lights with energy efficient LED lighting. Project #17-033 Justification More lighting is required in the front of the entry because of the increase in users of the clubhouse in the evening. The existing exterior bollard lights were installed in 1988. Repair parts for these lights are difficult to locate. The supports that anchor the lights are failing and require frequent repairs. These lights consume more electricity than new LED light fixtures. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". . Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Landscape Lighting Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$25,000 Dept Scoring 25 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 25,00025,000Vehicles and Equipment 25,000 25,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 25,00025,000Unfunded 25,000 25,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 238 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description Purchase a new skid steer loader that will replace one purchased in 2012. This loader is unique because of it's track system that allows it to maneuver on the grass without leaving ruts. This loader is used for snow removal, winter trail grooming, loading soil and removing tree debris. This vehicle purchased in 2012 will be 9 years old in 2020. As this vehicle continues to age, it requires more frequent repair and is not available for the grounds crew. This also reduces the time that the mechanic can spend on the grounds helping to improve the course conditions. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Environmental/greener alternatives have been considered and at this point are cost prohibitive and are not proven to be reliable. Project #17-037 Justification Replacement needed to keep maintenance fleet in working condition and up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Skidsteer Replacement Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$52,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 52,00052,000Vehicles and Equipment 52,000 52,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 52,00052,000Unfunded 52,000 52,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 239 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Centennial Lakes Park20192023thru Contact Tom Shirley Description Our current 2005 Chevrolet 4 x 4 pickup truck was originally scheduled to be replaced in 2015, and again in 2018, but was removed from our CIP due to funding constraints. The truck will have been in service for fifteen years in 2019 and will be ready for replacement. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Alternate fuel vehicles that we have looked at do not appear to have the horsepower necessary to take care of the winter plowing requirements that we need. Project #17-039 Justification This vehicle is used for plowing the park pathways and ice rink during the winter months, and for general park use year-round. The vehicle is used for hauling park supplies, equipment and landscape material. Useful Life Project Name Centennial Lakes Vehicle Purchase Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$30,000 Dept Scoring 26 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 30,00030,000Vehicles and Equipment 30,000 30,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 30,00030,000Unfunded 30,000 30,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 240 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Tara Brown Description Electrification of vehicles is happening at a fast pace as costs lower and mileage range continues to grow. Electric vehicles provide a way for residents and fleet owners to lower their GHG emissions and better air quality with zero tailpipe emissions. One of the top hurdles to EV adoption is the lack of charging infrastructure to 'fuel' up the vehicle. To support EV adoption, public, private, and residential owners will need to make investments in EV infrastructure throughout the city. There are currently four public locations for charging and all are in the greater Southdale area owned by Metrotransit and varied commerical businesses. Our first City owned public charging station will be in the 50th and France North Parking Ramp in fall of 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Electrification of vehicles is one of the top actions to reduce GHG emissions from transportation and better air quality as EVs have no tailpipe emissions. This will increase electricity use, but will have a smaller GHG emissions compared to gasoline or diesel fuel. Depending on placement, can also support our City Fleet transition to electric vehicles. COST CONSIDERATIONS: To manage load and report usage, an annual network fee is needed. Most vendors charge $500 annually for dual port charging station. Project #19-005 A Justification Vision Edina states, "Edina community is focused and invested in world-class citywide resource management systems, built around the leading principles of environmental sustainability." Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan's top environmental goal is to reduce GHG emissions 30% by 2025 and 80% by 2050. To do this, transportation, the second largest GHG emitting industry, will need to transition to technologies with a lower emissions and carbon footprint. Building an infrastructure to support this is critical. The City operations will need to invest in this infrastructure for its own fleet and for the public. This action will fulfill the Comprehensive Plan's direction to that City Operations should play a leadership role in emissions reduction. Useful Life Project Name EV Infrastructure - Phase II Category Equipment and Vehicles Type New Total Project Cost:$50,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 50,00025,000 25,000Vehicles and Equipment 25,000 25,000 50,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 50,00025,000 25,000Unfunded 25,000 25,000 50,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 241 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Aquatic Center20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description The Aquatic Center is located at 4300 W. 66th Street in Rosland Park. It attracts nearly 100,000 visitors each year, including Edina residents, visitors from the greater metro area and outstate Minnesota. The Aquatic Center does not have any signage on 66th Street or Valley View directing people to the facility or promoting the facility. An electronic sign would improve our branding, wayfinding, customer communication and marketing opportunities. We are missing a valuable opportunity to promote our facility to the high volume of traffic in the 66th Street and Valley View area and an electronic sign would provide that. Project #19-700 Justification The ongoing financial success of the Aquatic Center plays a vital role to the City. Consistently achieving 100% or better in cost recovery, allows the balance in the Aquatic Center Fund to remain whole and support the Edina Law. The Edina Law uses the Aquatic Center fund to leverage other financial needs within the City. The addition of electronic signage will demonstrate that the Aquatic Center will assist us with remaining competitive, relevant and innovative. In addition, as the Southdale area continues to expand it's residential base, we have an opportunity to highlight the Aquatic Center in a way that may enhance the benefits of living and working near an amenity that meets the needs of all ages. Useful Life Project Name Aquatic Center - Electronic Signage Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$75,000 Dept Scoring 31 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 75,00075,000Vehicles and Equipment 75,000 75,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 75,00075,000Unfunded 75,000 75,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 242 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description The netting that protects the Golf Dome fabric is in disrepair due to the high volume of golf balls that are hit on a daily basis. We have made repairs to the netting each of the last three years. Cost of repairs have ranged between $5,000 and $8,500. A new net design is required to alleviate the constant repairs. Project #19-730 Justification Replacement needed to keep facility up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. In strategic alignment with Edina’s mission statement to "offer premier public facilities". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Dome - Netting Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$32,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 32,00032,000Vehicles and Equipment 32,000 32,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 32,00032,000Unfunded 32,000 32,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 243 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description This request is for the purchase of a Bobcat (or similar) track machine with attachments. This machine is used to clear snow, unload trucks and help with lifting heavy items at the arena and dome. Attachments would include a bucket, forks, snow blower, plow and broom. Project #19-742 Justification Our current Bobcat is a 1995 model that we received used from the golf course. It is in need of tires, heater and windshield wipers. It is also too small for our snow plowing needs. Snow often piles up around the dome causing closures. Our current machine is too small to adequately handle large amounts of snow. With the addition of the dome we have more needs to move heavier loads. At times we need to borrow equipment from other City departments to complete certain tasks. This is fine but it also delays our progress and puts project time lines into the hands of another department. Useful Life Project Name Bobcat & Attachments Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$80,000 Dept Scoring 20 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 80,00080,000Vehicles and Equipment 80,000 80,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 80,00080,000Unfunded 80,000 80,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 244 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Arena20192023thru Contact Chad Eischens Description Braemar Arena currently has 12 security cameras on site. This request is for nine additional cameras. Our current security camera system has gaps in coverage including all of the exterior grounds, portions of the south arena and Zamboni maintenance areas. These additional cameras will provide for coverage in areas that have been problematic when reviewing video, recording parking lot events and attempting to follow individuals throughout the building. Project #19-747 Justification The City of Edina has a large investment into the physical assets at Braemar Arena. Additional cameras will enhance protection of those assets. In addition, we do have a number of theft cases, auto accidents and patron interactions each year that need to be reviewed on video. Currently we are limited with coverage to be able to adequately provide that review. Lastly, we have a responsibility to ensure the safety and security of all customers and employees. Our current system has limitations on doing that effectively. Useful Life Project Name Security Cameras Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$25,500 Dept Scoring 10 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 25,50025,500Planning and Design 25,500 25,500Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 25,50025,500Unfunded 25,500 25,500Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 245 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dave Nelson Description Dispatch consoles/furniture are used by 911 Police/Fire Dispatchers in our 24/7 911 communications center. The dispatch consoles were originally purchased in 2004 when we moved to our new facility. The dispatch center was remodeled in 2016 when we added a 4th dispatch position. At that time, we reused our original 3 dispatch consoles and reconfigured the room design to accommodate the added console. Seeing that this furniture is used 24/7 by all staff, it is starting to wear and show its age. The consoles also have environmental and ergonomic controls (fan, heat, lights and adjusting height) for each dispatcher because they they can go long periods at the desk without taking a break due to the nature of the work. These items are beginning to malfunction at times and are being repaired but parts are hard to come by. There is a percentage of the cost for the consoles that can be taken out of the E911 Fund. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Even though we do not know which company vendor we will be purchasing from, most that specialize in 24/7 dispatch furniture consoles are committed to environmental programs and manufacture products using recycled and low emitting materials that help customers exceed environmental standards in projects. Project #19-803 Justification Since the furniture is used 24/7 and shared amongst all of the dispatchers, it receives more wear and tear than the average workstation. We have done a great job at maintaining the current work stations however aging mechanical and other hardware will need to be replaced. Useful Life Project Name Dispatch Consoles/Furniture Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$95,000 Dept Scoring 14 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 95,00095,000Vehicles and Equipment 95,000 95,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 95,00095,000Unfunded 95,000 95,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 246 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dave Nelson Description The Edina Police Department identified the need for an Emergency Rescue Vehicle in 2004, and procured a Lenco BEARCAT to satisfy that need for our SWAT team. Our SWAT team is part of a multi-agency consortium of police departments to include the cities of Edina, Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Hopkins and St. Louis Park. We work together to sustain the highly trained Southwest Metro SWAT Team to respond to all high risk critical call outs that occur within the area. In order for our teams to effectively carry out our mission to protect the citizens and critical infrastructure of the region, we must have sufficient equipment to do the job. At this time, however, we do not have access to an up to date response vehicle capable of meeting the team’s needs for adequately responding to incidents and protecting the team from ballistic attacks. Though we all have the training and experience to protect against, mitigate the effects of, respond to and recover from terrorist attacks and natural disasters, our SWAT team is responsible for responding to all incidents that exceed the capability of patrol within our jurisdiction, including hostage situations, active shooters and barricaded gunmen, we hereby request $280,416 in funding to purchase a specialized tactical Emergency Rescue Vehicle. The only vehicle our team currently has access to when responding to high risk incidents is a 2004 Lenco BearCat. While this vehicle has helped to save lives and protect officers and civilians from ballistic and projectile attacks, it’s outdated technology and tactical capabilities no longer meet the needs of our team and our growing jurisdiction. Furthermore, the vehicle is starting to show signs of aging, with several body and mechanical issues that may limit its effectiveness as a rescue vehicle in the near future. Considering the increasing population, multiple corporate headquarters within our jurisdiction, as well as the severity and wide ranging nature of the threats facing our jurisdiction, this situation is insufficient for meeting the area’s needs or for providing for the safety of the people of our region. With the acquisition of a new Emergency Rescue Vehicle, SWAT will be able to respond to critical incidents more quickly and reliably than is currently possible. With the safety provided by the trucks’ hardened walls and windows we will be able enter hot zones to protect our officers, rescue civilians and increase the likelihood of a quick and positive resolution to incidents. Government grants for this equipment has ceased since the previous presidential administration. Through established relationships with several community members, donations have been offered to support this cause, however an exact amount is unknown that this time. Estimates of donations are around $60,000-$100,000. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: We have looked into refurbishing the current Emergency Rescue Vehicle, but it is not cost effective. The current vehicle can be traded in to the manufacturer to help offset our costs on a up-to-date model. The manufacturer will then re-purpose our current vehicle, so it will not be discarded. Fuel efficiency technology has increased over the past 14 years, and the new Emergency Rescue Vehicle would perform better than our current model. Specifically the manufacturer advises the fuel economy will increase 143% when comparing our current vehicle versus a new, up-to-date vehicle. BUDGET CONSIDERATIONS: Estimated $100k in donations and $75k in resale value. If retain, need $20k in glass replacement to restore visibility. Project #19-804 Justification In addition to the vehicle’s rugged body and durable tires, it also includes several other features that will help the team perform our duty. This Includes: • 2 remote control spotlights that are capable of providing lighting in darkened areas and assisting us in search and rescue operations. • A 14-foot hydraulic ram that can be attached to the front of the vehicle to allow officers to breach barricaded structures without exposing any personnel to potential gunfire. • A Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) that will enable the vehicle to be decontaminated after exposure to hazardous materials, allowing it to be used in response to HazMat emergencies. • A Gas Injector Unit will allow us to deploy chemicals into barricaded structures without exposing our personnel to potential gunfire. • A Thermal image color camera with two monitors to help find people hiding in the darkness, foliage, of other concealment. We have chosen this investment both because it improves the effectiveness and the safety of our tactical units and also because it is cost effective. Built on a Ford F550 chassis, the vehicle is inexpensive to service and maintain. Furthermore, the manufacturer has a GSA contract making it accessible through both the 1122 Counter Drug Procurement Program and the Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Schedule 84 permitting direct procurement while significantly reducing the cost of the vehicle to the government’s guaranteed lowest price. The lives of first responders, innocent Useful Life Project Name Emergency Rescue Vehicle Category Equipment and Vehicles Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$205,416 Dept Scoring 25 Status Pending Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 247 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dave Nelson civilians and even violent suspects are priceless and protecting them is our highest priority. This vehicle will reduce liability, enhance capability and expand rescue options, allowing us to minimize personal injury and property damage. SWAT has been involved in numerous high risk incidents that show this jurisdiction’s vulnerability to attacks. This includes two homicide cases in 2017 that have involved our current response vehicle. One was a barricaded subject who had murdered his wife and then surrendered as soon as the vehicle was brought on scene. The other was a manhunt for a homicide suspect thought to be hiding in a wooded area. Using the thermal imaging camera on our current vehicle we were able to locate the suspect and call for his surrender. These incidents, and similar events, show the need for our area to obtain an up to date rescue vehicle that offers protection from ballistic and explosive threats in order to improve our response time and provide better protection for our operators and civilians. Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 205,416205,416Vehicles and Equipment 205,416 205,416Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 100,000100,000Construction Fund: Grants & Donations 105,416105,416Unfunded 205,416 205,416Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 248 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Land 19-200 150,000150,000Cahill Industrial Park - Area Plan 150,000150,000Land Total GRAND TOTAL 150,000150,000 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 249 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Community Development20192023thru Contact Cary Teague Description This Area Plan is recommended in the 2018 Comprehensive Plan Update. It expands the 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan to include the entire Industrial park to Highway 100 on the east, the City's border on the south and Cahill Road on the West. This area connects to Pentagon Park and ultimately to the Southdale Area. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Cut down on the amount of paer copies created. The Plan should be double sided. Encourage on-lne viewing of the plan. Project #19-200 Justification This study is the result of the 70th and Cahill Small Area Plan (Part of the 2018 Comprehensive Plan). The original idea came out of the "Big Ideas" Work Shop, held at the beginning of the Comprehensive Plan Update. This large industrial area provides potential redevelopment opportunities, connections to Pentagon Park and the Southdale Area to the east, and future connection opportunities for rail connections to the north to Grandview. Useful Life Project Name Cahill Industrial Park - Area Plan Category Land Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$150,000 Dept Scoring Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 150,000150,000Planning and Design 150,000 150,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 150,000150,000Unfunded 150,000 150,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 250 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Parks 15-032 175,000175,000Wooddale Park Playground Equipment 17-040 43,80043,800Edinborough Park Adventure Peak Renovation 17-044 77,00077,000Braemar Golf Patio Furniture 17-139 125,000125,000Birchcrest Park Playground Replacement 17-142 55,00055,000Courtney Fields Irrigation 17-143 40,00040,000Creek Valley Irrigation 17-144 100,000100,000Fox Meadow Park Playground Equipment 17-145 30,00030,000Garden Park Irrigation 17-148 175,000175,000Lewis Park Playground Replacement 17-180 125,000125,000Strachauer Park Playground Replacement 17-182 125,000125,000Todd Park Playground Equipment 17-183 40,00040,000Van Valkenburg Irrigation 17-185 125,000125,000Walnut Ridge Park Playground Replacement 17-186 45,00045,000Weber Park Irrigation System 17-187 90,00090,000Weber Woods Dog Park Fencing & Parking Lot 19-762 125,000125,000Highlands Park Playground Replacement 19-765 2,200,0002,200,000Braemar Park Improvements 19-766 13,700,00013,700,000Fred Richards Park Renovation - Phase II 17,395,8002,452,000 13,743,800 495,000 320,000 385,000Parks Total GRAND TOTAL 17,395,8002,452,000 13,743,800 495,000 320,000 385,000 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 251 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This is a project to replace the existing playground structure and safety surface at Wooddale Park. Project #15-032 Justification There are 25 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system. The playground equipment at Wooddale Park was installed in 2000. Park Maintenance devised a system to rank each playground structure estimating use, traffic patterns, worn items, environmental conditions such as wind, rain and sun damage, and imagination in the structure. The playground structures were ranked from one to five, 1 being the highest priority for replacement and 5 being the lowest priority. The playground structure at Birchcrest Park was ranked a priority 1. A budget of $175,000 is proposed to provide an accessible and barrier free design which is more costly due to the preferred safety surface. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states. Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. The current playground structure does not meet current ADA regulations for a universal playground. Staff would like a Universal Playground in each quadrant of the city. This location is a heavily used park with a large parking lot and restrooms. It would be a good candidate for a Universal Playground and would serve the NE quadrant of the City. Useful Life Project Name Wooddale Park Playground Equipment Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$175,000 Dept Scoring 39 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 175,000175,000Vehicles and Equipment 175,000 175,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 175,000175,000Unfunded 175,000 175,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 252 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Edinborough Park20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description Adventure Peak was built in 2003 and several sections of the play structure include original equipment that needs to be replaced. This renovation would include the replacement of deck pads, thick foam pipe covering, safety netting throughout Adventure Peak, and renovate the signature climbing event, which is the tree house. The foam pipe covering is original and is starting to wear out and tear due to heavy use. A few of the foam pipe sections and safety netting has been replaced in the highest traffic area, so it is not uniform throughout the structure. This detracts from the aesthetics and uniformity of the structure. All of the events in Adventure Peak are custom made and the tree house base is showing fractures that need attention. This is a 2020 project. Project #17-040 Justification Each year thousands of children play in Adventure Peak and celebrate their birthday party at Adventure Peak generating revenue of nearly $900,000 annually. Adventure Peak attracts people to Edina from all over the Twin Cities metro area and is one of the most used indoor play structures in the country. Exterior foam and soft deck pads wear out with use. The thick foam padding covers all of the structural piping throughout Adventure Peak. Kids hang on and bump into the pads. Replacing deck pads and foam pipe covering is essential to maintaining safety standards on Adventure Peak. Edinborough Park has a reputation in the community to be a safe facility for families to enjoy. Adventure Peak has set the standard in the Twin Cities, and the upper Midwest, as the premier indoor playpark facility. This project aligns with Edina's Vision Statement with regard to being future oriented. Continuous improvements have been made to Adventure Peak for it to remain competitive, relevant and innovative. Other municipalities are investing significantly in updating their playparks and we need to continue to do the same. Useful Life Project Name Edinborough Park Adventure Peak Renovation Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$43,800 Dept Scoring 43 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 43,80043,800Vehicles and Equipment 43,800 43,800Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 43,80043,800Unfunded 43,800 43,800Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 253 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Golf Course20192023thru Contact Joe Abood Description Replace furniture on both the south deck and the west deck. The furniture is approximately eight years old . There is currently 11 sets of tables and chairs on the west deck and 7 on the south deck along with 4 cushioned rockers. Both decks have a high volume of traffic and it has continued to increase over the years. Since the time the current furniture was purchased the traffic on the deck area has increased and customers are more inclined to come solely to eat and spend significantly more time there. Project #17-044 Justification The current furniture has held up reasonably well given the high traffic on the decks. However, the harsh weather in Minnesota has taken its toll on it. Several tables and most chairs have paint chips. In addition, when we increased the amount of furniture on the deck the original tables and chairs were no longer available so there are a few different styles. The deck space is tired and new furniture should reflect our updated brand as well as increased functionality. Replacement needed to keep facility up to acceptable standards for a premier facility. In strategic alignment with Edina’s mission statement to "offer premier public facilities". The National Golf Foundation (NGF) report also confirms justification "NGF has observed declining investment in in the golf courses as revenues declined. Golf courses are "living and breathing" assets that will deteriorate over time, and significant reductions in capital expenditures eventually will catch up to the system". Useful Life Project Name Braemar Golf Patio Furniture Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$77,000 Dept Scoring 15 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 77,00077,000Vehicles and Equipment 77,000 77,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 77,00077,000Unfunded 77,000 77,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 254 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This is a project to replace the existing playground structure and safety surface at Birchcrest Park. Project #17-139 Justification There are 25 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system. The playground equipment at Birchcrest Park was installed in 1997. Park Maintenance devised a system to rank each playground structure estimating use, traffic patterns, worn items, environmental conditions such as wind, rain and sun damage, and imagination in the structure. The playground structures were ranked from one to five, 1 being the highest priority for replacement and 5 being the lowest priority. The playground structure at Birchcrest Park was ranked a priority 2. A budget of $125,000 is proposed to provide an accessible design at the existing site. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states. Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Birchcrest Park Playground Replacement Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$125,000 Dept Scoring 37 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 125,000125,000Construction 125,000 125,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 125,000125,000Unfunded 125,000 125,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 255 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description Braemar,or Courtney Fields is an active park within our parks system, with four fields that are utilized by private athletic leagues and the Edina Public School system. The current system is 40 years old, and is due for replacement and no longer supported. Which means we are unable to secure parts for this system on top of this the system also uses an excess amount of water and is not efficient. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Chapter 8 section 3 of our comprehensive plan has set the goal of providing the sustainability of our City water system through preservation and conservation. An improved and updated water irrigation system that is more effective in the metering capability will assist us in accomplishing this goal. Project #17-142 Justification This is a part of our City Work plan to maintain optimum field operations. The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” This project follows the mission statement by providing effective and values public services and maintaining a sound public infrastructure to sustain and improve the high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Useful Life Project Name Courtney Fields Irrigation Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$55,000 Dept Scoring 41 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 55,00055,000Vehicles and Equipment 55,000 55,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 55,00055,000Unfunded 55,000 55,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 256 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description Creek Valley park is an active park within our parks system, with two soccer fields that are utilized by private athletic leagues and the Edina Public School system. The current system is 30 years old, and is due for replacement. Which means we are unable to secure parts for this system .on top of this the system also uses an excess amount of water and is not efficient. It is important to note that the athletic fields are on school district property but we have maintained them for a long time. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Chapter 8 section 3 of our comprehensive plan has set the goal of providing the sustainability of our City water system through preservation and conservation. An improved and updated water irrigation system that is more effective and the metering capability will assist us in accomplishing this goal. Project #17-143 Justification This is a part of our City Work plan to maintain optimum field operations. The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” This project follows the mission statement by providing effective and values public services and maintaining a sound public infrastructure to sustain and improve the high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Useful Life Project Name Creek Valley Irrigation Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$40,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 40,00040,000Vehicles and Equipment 40,000 40,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 40,00040,000Unfunded 40,000 40,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 257 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This is a project to replace the existing playground structure and safety surface at Fox Meadow Park. Project #17-144 Justification There are 25 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system. The playground equipment at Fox Meadow Park was installed in 1996. Park Maintenance devised a system to rank each playground structure estimating use, traffic patterns, worn items, environmental conditions such as wind, rain and sun damage, and imagination in the structure. The playground structures were ranked from one to five, 1 being the highest priority for replacement and 5 being the lowest priority. The playground structure at Fox Meadow Park was ranked a priority 1. A budget of $100,000 is proposed to provide an accessible and barrier free design which is more costly due to the preferred safety surface. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states - Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Fox Meadow Park Playground Equipment Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$100,000 Dept Scoring 39 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 100,000100,000Vehicles and Equipment 100,000 100,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 100,000100,000Unfunded 100,000 100,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 258 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description Garden park is an active park within our parks system, with two soccer fields that are utilized by private athletic leagues and the Edina Public School system. The current system is 40 years old, and is due for replacement and no longer supported. Which means we are unable to secure parts for this system .on top of this the system also uses an excess amount of water and is not efficient. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Chapter 8 section 3 of our comprehensive plan has set the goal of providing the sustainability of our City water system through preservation and conservation. An improved and updated water irrigation system that is more effective in the metering capability will assist us in accomplishing this goal. Project #17-145 Justification This is a part of our City Work plan to maintain optimum field operations. The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” This project follows the mission statement by providing effective and values public services and maintaining a sound public infrastructure to sustain and improve the high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Useful Life Project Name Garden Park Irrigation Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$30,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 30,00030,000Construction 30,000 30,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 30,00030,000Unfunded 30,000 30,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 259 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This is a project to replace the existing playground structure and safety surface at Lewis Park. Project #17-148 Justification There are 25 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system. The playground equipment at Lewis Park was installed in 1995. Park Maintenance devised a system to rank each playground structure estimating use, traffic patterns, worn items, environmental conditions such as wind, rain and sun damage, and imagination in the structure. The playground structures were ranked from one to five, 1 being the highest priority for replacement and 5 being the lowest priority. The playground structure at Lewis Park was ranked a priority 1. A budget of $175,000 is proposed to provide an accessible and barrier free design which is more costly due to the preferred safety surface. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states. Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Staff would like to place a Universal Playground in each quadrant of the City. This would serve the SW quadrant of Edina. Lewis is a heavily used park with a parking lot and restroom facilities. The existing play structure is heavily used and has far exceeded its life expectancy. Useful Life Project Name Lewis Park Playground Replacement Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$175,000 Dept Scoring 41 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 175,000175,000Vehicles and Equipment 175,000 175,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 175,000175,000Unfunded 175,000 175,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 260 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Susan Faus Description This is a project to replace the existing playground structure and safety surface at Strachauer Park. Project #17-180 Justification There are 25 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system. The playground equipment at Strachauer Park was installed in 1996. Park Maintenance devised a system to rank each playground structure estimating use, traffic patterns, worn items, environmental conditions such as wind, rain and sun damage, and imagination in the structure. The playground structures were ranked from one to five, 1 being the highest priority for replacement and 5 being the lowest priority. The playground structure at Strachauer Park was ranked a priority 1. A budget of $125,000 is proposed to provide an accessible design. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states. Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Strachauer Park Playground Replacement Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$125,000 Dept Scoring 41 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 125,000125,000Vehicles and Equipment 125,000 125,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 125,000125,000Unfunded 125,000 125,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 261 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This is a project to replace the existing playground structure and safety surface at Todd Park. Project #17-182 Justification There are 25 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system. The playground equipment at Todd Park was installed in 1997. Park Maintenance devised a system to rank each playground structure estimating use, traffic patterns, worn items, environmental conditions such as wind, rain and sun damage, and imagination in the structure. The playground structures were ranked from one to five, 1 being the highest priority for replacement and 5 being the lowest priority. The playground structure at Todd Park was ranked a priority 2. A budget of $125,000 is proposed to provide an accessible design. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states, Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Todd Park Playground Equipment Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$125,000 Dept Scoring 37 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 125,000125,000Vehicles and Equipment 125,000 125,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 125,000125,000Unfunded 125,000 125,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 262 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description Van Valkenburg park is an active park within our parks system, with three fields that are utilized by private athletic leagues and the Edina Public School system. The current system is 40 years old, and is due for replacement and no longer supported. Which means we are unable to secure parts for this system .on top of this the system also uses an excess amount of water and is not efficient. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Chapter 8 section 3 of our comprehensive plan has set the goal of providing the sustainability of our City water system through preservation and conservation. An improved and updated water irrigation system that is more effective in the metering capability will assist us in accomplishing this goal. Project #17-183 Justification This is a part of our City Work plan to maintain optimum field operations. The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” This project follows the mission statement by providing effective and values public services and maintaining a sound public infrastructure to sustain and improve the high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Useful Life Project Name Van Valkenburg Irrigation Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$40,000 Dept Scoring 41 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 40,00040,000Construction 40,000 40,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 40,00040,000Unfunded 40,000 40,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 263 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This is a project to replace the existing playground structure and safety surface at Walnut Ridge Park. Project #17-185 Justification There are 25 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system. The playground equipment at Walnut Ridge Park was installed in 1997. Park Maintenance devised a system to rank each playground structure estimating use, traffic patterns, worn items, environmental conditions such as wind, rain and sun damage, and imagination in the structure. The playground structures were ranked from one to five, 1 being the highest priority for replacement and 5 being the lowest priority. The playground structure at Walnut Ridge Park was ranked a priority 2. A budget of $125,000 is proposed to provide an accessible design. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states. Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Walnut Ridge Park Playground Replacement Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$125,000 Dept Scoring 37 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 125,000125,000Vehicles and Equipment 125,000 125,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 125,000125,000Unfunded 125,000 125,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 264 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description Weber Park is an active park in our park system whose three fields are used by both public athletic leagues and the Edina School system. The field is a "hard pan" type and is a safety concern for play. An irrigation system in conjunction with field turf maintenance, would eliminate this concern. We are looking to irrigate the entire field. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Chapter 8 section 3 of our comprehensive plan has set the goal of providing the sustainability of our City water system through preservation and conservation. An improved and updated water irrigation system that is more effective and the metering capability will assist us in accomplishing this goal. Project #17-186 Justification This is a part of our City Work plan to maintain optimum field operations. The City’s mission statement “is to provide effective and valued public services, maintain a sound public infrastructure, offer premier public facilities and guide the development and redevelopment of lands, all in a manner that sustains and improves the health and uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses.” This project follows the mission statement by providing effective and values public services and maintaining a sound public infrastructure to sustain and improve the high quality of life enjoyed by our residents and businesses. Useful Life Project Name Weber Park Irrigation System Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$45,000 Dept Scoring 39 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 45,00045,000Construction 45,000 45,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 45,00045,000Unfunded 45,000 45,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 265 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description "Weber Woods" is a new 15 acre park purchased from the City of Minneapolis in 2016. It is located at 41st and France Avenue and is adjacent to Weber Park in the very NE corner of Edina. 9.77 acres of the park are in Edina and 4.77 acres are in the City of St. Louis Park. The cities of Edina and St. Louis Park have discussed jointly planning and improving the property. The park currently has no master plan to guide planning, development or donation opportunities. A strategic and planned joint approach with the City of St. Louis Park is needed. Currently the park is being used as a very active unofficial off leash dog park and has dirt walking and mountain biking trails. Currently the only official dog park in Edina is a very small park located in the NW corner of the City at VanValkenburg Park. A seasonal dog park is located in the hockey rink at Strachauer Park. One of our most requested amenities is more off leash dog parks. Project #17-187 Justification A MOU will be discussed with the City of St. Louis Park for planning, development and maintenance, but for planning purposes, it is assumed that the City of Edina will assume 2/3 of planning costs and the City of St. Louis park will assume 1/3, based on percentages of property ownership. Coordinating the years of investment with the City of St. Louis Park will be critical. In order to continue to officially operate a safe and standard best practice off leash dog park, fencing and a parking lot are needed. If a community driven master plan is completed in 2017, the official dog park could be added in 2018. Useful Life Project Name Weber Woods Dog Park Fencing & Parking Lot Category Parks Type New Total Project Cost:$90,000 Dept Scoring 20 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 90,00090,000Vehicles and Equipment 90,000 90,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 90,00090,000Unfunded 90,000 90,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 266 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Tom Swenson Description This is a project to replace the existing playground structure and safety surface at Highlands Park. Project #19-762 Justification There are 25 outdoor playground equipment structures throughout the park system. The playground equipment at Birchcrest Park was installed in 1997. Park Maintenance devised a system to rank each playground structure estimating use, traffic patterns, worn items, environmental conditions such as wind, rain and sun damage, and imagination in the structure. The playground structures were ranked from one to five, 1 being the highest priority for replacement and 5 being the lowest priority. The playground structure at Highlands Park was ranked a priority 3. A budget of $125,000 is proposed to provide an accessible design at the existing site. In the Parks, Recreation & Trails Strategic Plan in the Implementation Framework, Strategy 2.1 states. Identify facilities not meeting community needs and develop plan for replacement, renovation, or decommissioning. Useful Life Project Name Highlands Park Playground Replacement Category Parks Type Replace or repair Total Project Cost:$125,000 Dept Scoring 41 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 125,000125,000Vehicles and Equipment 125,000 125,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 125,000125,000Unfunded 125,000 125,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 267 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Ann Kattreh Description Braemar Park's approximately 500 acres of park land serves a wide variety of recreational activities, programming and user groups throughout the year. The park also contains a large and diverse natural resource environment which visitors can explore along existing trail systems located along the east, west and south perimeter areas of the golf course. In addition to the Braemar regulation course, Academy 9, Driving Range and Golf Dome, the Park is also home to Braemar Arena, Field, Backyard, Courtney Field and the South Metro Training Facility. A master plan of the park was completed in 2017 which focused on the following initiatives: Improving the connectivity of trail systems, access and wayfinding to park amenities and facilities; providiing separated use trail systems to accommodate walkers, mountain bikers and cross country skiers; identifying new site improvements and recreational amenities to enhance existing facilities; developing recommendations and priorities for improving the quality of natural resources in the park; incorporating sustainable site and trail improvements which promote good stewardship of the parks land and water resources. Staff and the Parks & Recreation Commission prioritized the following projects from the master plan: Walking trails, mountain biking trails, Courtney Field play area and picnic shelter, a bituminous loop trail at Courtney Fields and oak woodland and savanna restoration, prairie restoration and native vegetation buffering. Detailed design and bid documents will need to be completed. This would begin in 2019. Construction would be in 2019/2020. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: The Braemar Park Master Plan was completed in conjunction with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Applied Ecological Services. The plan is very environmentally sensitive. It improves and increases the oak savanna and woodland at Braemar, removes buckthorn, restores prairies and adds native vegetation buffering. It will be a great habitat restoration project and will provide educational opportunities for residents while providing significantly improved access to natural areas in the park. Project #19-765 Justification In 2017 the City Council approved the final Braemar Park Master Plan document and asked staff to prioritize the master plan projects. In the Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure section of the 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan it states: Identify funding source and timeline for implementation of the Braemar Park Master Plan by Q2 of 2018. Useful Life Project Name Braemar Park Improvements Category Parks Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$2,200,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 2,200,0002,200,000Construction 2,200,000 2,200,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 2,200,0002,200,000Unfunded 2,200,000 2,200,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 268 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Park & Recreation20192023thru Contact Ann Kattreh Description In summary, the master plan concept recommendation is as follows: 1. Nature Bank – Pursue the wetland banking approach. Several nodes are included in the "Pathways to Play" concept: Pollinator; Habitat; Contemplation; Woodland; Water. 2. Neighborhood Park - The neighborhood playground is highlighted along with a picnic shelter. Residential connections to the larger park are achieved with a bridge and the Nine Mile Creek Trail. This would be more of a traditional playground facility for the Parklawn neighborhood. 3. Great Lawn - open lawn with possible athletic fields 4. Central Green - Elements included in this area are a traditional playground, pickleball courts and a multi-purpose sport court that could be used for basketball and futsal. Mounds and berms have been created to create visual and recreational interest and amenities. The berms will provide screening for neighbors to the north and west and can be used for sitting, sledding, relaxing and exploring. Creating the mounds also reduce grading costs by creating a location for soils to be relocated onsite instead of being removed from the site. 5. The Loop – The loop focuses on a rolling walking trail, gardens, seating areas and possibly public art. 6. Clubhouse Building – There continues to be interest in renovating the clubhouse for a restaurant/brewpub as well as potentially teaming with Three Rivers Park District for programming and creating trailhead features. A potential craft brew pub type facility similar to Crooked Pint in Chaska was given as an example for continued revenue to support park maintenance. This concept will be studied in greater detail if the concept is supported by the City Council. The concept plan shows an enlarged Clubhouse, but the cost to improve this building is not included in the project cost estimate. 7. Parking – The concept includes 155 parking stalls on Fred Richards Park property with the addition of a parking lot. The plan needs additional parking from the Pentagon Park/Link development. Outside of city property the project hopes for 100 shared “parkway” stalls and 134 stalls in a shared parking lot. Detailed design and construction documents need to be completed. The final design process will take 6 - 9 months. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: This project will be a model project for environmental restoration and stormwater management. The City will work with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the state Board of Water and Soil Resources (BOWSR) to complete this project. Many trees will be planted on the site. If athletic field lighting and pickleball court lighting is installed, it will be LED with no-spill lighting technology. Project #19-766 Justification In 2016 the City Council approved the final Fred Richards Park Master Plan document. In the Maintain Physical Assets & Infrastructure section of the 2018-2019 Budget Work Plan it states: Identify funding source and timeline for implementation of the Fred Richards Park Master Plan by Q2 of 2018. Useful Life Project Name Fred Richards Park Renovation - Phase II Category Parks Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$13,700,000 Dept Scoring 45 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 1,950,0001,950,000Planning and Design 11,750,00011,750,000Construction 13,700,000 13,700,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 13,700,00013,700,000Unfunded 13,700,000 13,700,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 269 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota PROJECTS BY CATEGORY 2019 2023thru Total20192020202120222023CategoryProject # Technology 15-211 150,00030,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Electronic Document Management 17-042 35,00035,000Edinborough Park Automation for Roof Top Units 19-801 30,00030,000Automated Secure Alarm Protocol 215,00030,000 60,000 65,000 30,000 30,000Technology Total GRAND TOTAL 215,00030,000 60,000 65,000 30,000 30,000 Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 270 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Deb Mangen Description In 2013 the City selected Laserfiche as its organization-wide electronic records management system, and branded it as City Docs. City Docs provides secure storage, retention, disaster recovery, and quick, searchable access to City records. This tool was planned to be implemented in three phases: Phase 1) Permanent records in each department are archived, searchable and accessible to authorized employees. To date, the majority of permanent records have been scanned with the exception of Building Inspections and Human Resources records. These last two departments require additional resources to implement. All employees have access to search authorized records. 30 employees have licenses to add and maintain records. Phase 2) New records are stored and appropriately retained in City Docs on an ongoing basis. Records commonly requested are searchable by the public on the City's web site. There are numerous examples where the records system allowed staff to quickly and easily access information that used to take hours searching paper documents. This phase is still in process. Phase 3) Complete scanning of old records. Begin to use City Docs to manage processes and requests that require review or approval across departments, or externally such as personnel files, data practices requests, or various other review or approval that requires routing. This phase has been initiated but requires additional investment as indicated. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: Environmental benefits to the project include reduction in use of paper, toner, energy, and storage. COST CONSIDERATIONS: There will be ongoing operating costs for subscription fees of additional licenses as more staff become involved in work flows. Project #15-211 Justification There are many strategic advantages to this project, including: 1) Secure storage and disaster recovery. 2) Improved efficiency and accuracy locating records for staff and fulfilling Data Practices requests. 3) Increased transparency through web site. 4) Increased efficiency and accuracy manging retention. 5) Increased efficiency and accuracy managing processes across departments. 6) Reduced costs for paper, printing, and storage. These benefits relate to the following initiatives: Vision Edina: Sustainable Environment - Edina has focused and invested in world-class citywide resource management systems, built around the leading principles of environmental sustainability. We have substantially reduced our overall environmental impact and significantly increased our resource use efficiency. Future Oriented - Edina is willing to use its resources and expertise to apply new ideas and technology. Focus #7: Environmental Stewardship Admin Department Work Plan: Evaluate and make recommendations to improve Internal Work Flow Develop long-term strategy for Records retention using Edina Docs and identify framework for implementing workflows. For example investigate intregration with LOGIS PIMs licensing data base to automatically store license renewals and do away with paper records. Useful Life Project Name Electronic Document Management Category Technology Type Expand or enhance Total Project Cost:$150,000 Dept Scoring 40 Status Pending Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 271 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Administration & HRA20192023thru Contact Deb Mangen Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 150,00030,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Installation/Maintenance 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 150,00030,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Unfunded 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 150,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 272 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Parks: Edinborough Park20192023thru Contact Patty McGrath Description Install automation for the roof top units that heat and cool Edinborough Park. This automation would allow more precise control of the units, remote control of the units, and detailed information when there is a problem, thus saving time in problem solving and keeping the park heating and cooling system operating at it's optimal levels. The park is nearly one acre in size and it is critical for us to maintain proper indoor temperatures for all of our guests. Project #17-042 Justification Three roof top units provide all of the heating and cooling for the park. When we experience an outage or mechanical problem, we generally do not know immediately. By the time we do know something is wrong, the problem is generally affecting our guest experience in some manner. Annually, the budget for heating and cooling is over $100,000. The detailed information that automation would provide would be extremely helpful in trouble shooting the problem and determining if we can fix it, or if we need to expedite a call to our maintenance contractor. Useful Life Project Name Edinborough Park Automation for Roof Top Units Category Technology Type New Total Project Cost:$35,000 Dept Scoring 30 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 35,00035,000Construction 35,000 35,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 35,00035,000Unfunded 35,000 35,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 273 Capital Improvement Plan City of Edina, Minnesota Department Police20192023thru Contact Dave Nelson Description The Automated Secure Alarm Protocol (ASAP) program is a computer-aided dispatch system designed by the Central Station Alarm Association (CSAA) and the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials (APCO Int'l). The protocol reduces the two, to three minute relay currently in place by allowing a computer at the dispatch center to process data from alarm companies on active burglary, fire and medical alarms. This project could be funded through the E911 fund. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: No environmental concerns since this is a computer software interface. Project #19-801 Justification Having this computer interface in place reduces time and potential errors from alarms companies having to place a phone call into the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP). The interface connects the systems so active alarms would automatically populate into our CAD system which would allow responders to see the alarm instantly. This interface would reduce response times for Police, Fire and EMS responders since we are removing the dispatch telephone delay. Useful Life Project Name Automated Secure Alarm Protocol Category Technology Type New Total Project Cost:$30,000 Dept Scoring 35 Status Pending Total20192020202120222023Expenditures 30,00030,000Software 30,000 30,000Total Total20192020202120222023Funding Sources 30,00030,000Unfunded 30,000 30,000Total Thursday, November 1, 2018Page 274 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GLOSSARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 275 1. Funds a. Construction Fund – This fund is designed to provide accounting for many different sources of funding for CIP projects such as the equipment levy, grants and donations, grants from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and any special assessments as well as transfers from other funds. Construction Fund: Available Funding includes General Fund reserves already identified and transferred into the Construction Fund by Council action. This category also includes budgeted transfers from the Utility Fund & Liquor Fund. Finally, this category includes a new (in 2017) CIP Levy. There are no spending restrictions on these revenue sources. Construction Fund: Equipment Levy is designed to provide a funding source to replace all the equipment currently used for governmental purposes. This revolving fund is replenished by a tax levy and allows the City to buy essential equipment without the additional costs of issuing debt. Equipment purchased under this program includes squad cars, fire trucks, plows, passenger cars and trucks, and even lawn mowers, among other items. Construction Fund: Grants and Donations includes grants and donations the City may receive from the Federal, State, and other local governments. We also may receive donations from local residents, businesses or community organizations. Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens provided the City Council authorizes such acceptance via resolution adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. Grants and donations can be difficult to plan for in advance. Construction Fund: Municipal State Aid (MSA) is a grant from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) that provides funding assistance for improvements to those municipal streets which are designated as part of its MSA system. Money for this fund is supplied with a dedicated portion of revenues collected from road use and gasoline taxes. Funds are released for improvements on those streets on the system whose design and construction meet MSA standards. Funds may be expended for any street on the MSA system at any time, and MSA funds may be accumulated over several years. Construction Fund: Special Assessments are based on the concept that when land is benefited from a particular improvement, all or part of the costs of the improvement should be levied against those properties to finance such improvements. For larger special assessments, owners may pay the City back over a period of up to 15 years. Since it often takes several years for the City to collect special assessments, the City may decide to issue bonds for cash CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GLOSSARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 276 flow purposes. See Public Improvement Revolving Bonds for further description of this financing tool. Construction Fund: Public, Education and Government (PEG) fee is a cable bill fee used to fund Education and Public cable access channels. b. Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Fund - This fund accounts for the activities of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Sources of revenue in this fund include: HRA Fund: 70th & Cahill TIF represents the balances from three decertified districts: 70th & Cahill, 44th & France District and Wooddale Valley View District. The districts were decertified in 1999, and the remaining balances were pooled into this account to be invested in redevelopment projects in these three districts. HRA Fund: Centennial Lakes TIF is a tax increment district. In tax increment districts, property owners pay ad valorem taxes at the full rate levied by the units of local government within the taxing jurisdiction. This district is no longer generating new tax increments. HRA Fund: Grandview 2 TIF is a tax increment district. In tax increment districts, property owners pay ad valorem taxes at the full rate levied by the units of local government within the taxing jurisdiction. HRA Fund: Southdale 2 TIF is a tax increment district. In tax increment districts, property owners pay ad valorem taxes at the full rate levied by the units of local government within the taxing jurisdiction. c. Utility Enterprise Funds – The City operates one Utility Fund that offers four services, water, sewer, storm sewer and recycling. The City periodically conducts rate studies to help determine if revenue collected will be sufficient to pay operating and capital costs of running these services in the future. The last rate study was completed in the fall of 2015. Utility Fund: Sewer is revenue received from customers for sewer disposal and treatment services. This revenue can be spent on operational, capital, and debt service costs of providing sewer service. Utility Fund: Storm is revenue received from customers for storm water drainage services. This revenue can be spent on operational, capital, and debt service costs of providing storm service. Utility Fund: Water is revenue received from customers for water service. This revenue can be spent on operational, capital, and debt service costs of providing water service. d. Conservation and Sustainability (CAS) Fund: Utility Franchise Fees - The City created a new fund in 2016 that collects money from a utility franchise fee to be used for projects that promote conservation and sustainability. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA GLOSSARY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Page 277 e. Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund: Utility Franchise Fees - The City created a new fund in 2013 that collects money from a utility franchise fee to be used for projects that promote pedestrian and bike safety, usually by building sidewalks, paths and trails. f. PD Special Revenue Fund - The Police Department collects revenue from several sources that have restrictions on how the money can be spent. These sources include E-911 and federal and state forfeiture funds. g. Liquor Fund - This fund accounts for the activities of the City’s municipal liquor operation, Edina Liquor. Revenue received from liquor sales can be spent on operations and capital improvements related to liquor sales. In addition, excess revenues are appropriated to support other City activities, including park enterprises like the Arena, Art Center and Golf Course Funds. Excess liquor revenue is also appropriated to the General Fund and Construction Fund. 2. Bond Financing – For many of the above funding sources, the City and/or the HRA may decide to sell bonds to pay the upfront costs of a project when cash flows from the project funding sources are not immediately available. There are many different bond programs that the City uses, each with different names and sometimes legal and fiscal requirements. A few of the programs the City has used in the past are listed below. a. Enterprise Revenue Bonds – Most of the Enterprise Revenue Bonds that the City issues pay for Utility Fund project costs, but the City may issue Enterprise Revenue Bonds for any of our enterprises. These bonds are designed to be repaid with revenues from the enterprise facilities that benefit from the projects financed, therefore no levy is required. b. Tax Increment Bonds – The City has previously issued Tax Increment bonds to pay TIF project costs. The bonds are repaid with the tax increment revenue that is generated by the district; therefore no additional levy is required. c. Public Project Lease Revenue Bonds – These bonds are typically issued by the HRA and backed by the City through an annual appropriation. d. Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds – PIR bonds are generally issued for street improvement projects and are repaid with special assessment receipts over a fifteen-year period. These bonds are supported through special assessments, therefore no levy is required. e. General Obligation (GO) – There are several types of GO debt available for the City to use. Although no new issues are included in this plan, the City currently has CIP bonds. GO debt may require a levy. CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 EdinaMN.gov 952-826-0366 The CITY of EDINA 2019 CIP, Budgets and Tax Levy December 4, 2018 The CITY of EDINAAgenda •Budget •2019-23 Capital Improvement Plan •2019 Budget and Levies •Tax Comparisons www.EdinaMN.gov 2 The CITY of EDINAEdina’s Budget www.EdinaMN.gov 3 Edina Consolidated Budget $125M Governmental Funds $82M General Fund $41M Debt Service Fund $8M Construction Fund $11M Special Revenue Funds, including HRA Enterprise Funds $43M Utility Fund $18M Liquor Fund $13M Park Enterprises $12M The CITY of EDINA 4 Budget & Work Plan Process •Systemic •Reflects community goals •Aligned at all levels •Outcome-based •Work Plan Drives budget Work Plan Budget www.EdinaMN.gov The CITY of EDINABiennial Budget Process www.EdinaMN.gov 5 The CITY of EDINACIP Timeline Date Event Action Dec 2017 Council Meeting Approve 2018/2019 City Budget & Work Plan April 18 ELT Staff Meeting CIP staff kickoff CIP Prep Depts. Prepare Forms June 8 Finance Deadline Forms & Prioritization due to Finance CIP Prioritization Committee Review Aug 1 ELT Meeting Draft CIP reviewed by ELT Aug 7 Work Session Draft CIP presented to Council Sept 13/20 HRA/Council Meeting HRA/Council adopted preliminary levies Nov 7 Work Session Staff presents CIP and Budget to Council Dec 4 Council Meeting Public hearing & adopt final budget & CIP www.EdinaMN.gov 6 The CITY of EDINA2019-23 CIP Summary •232 Total Projects •- 152 Projects have an identified funding source •- 80 Projects are unfunded •Total Cost - $194.4M •- $51.4 is unfunded www.EdinaMN.gov 7 The CITY of EDINA2019-23 CIP By Category www.EdinaMN.gov 8 Buildings Equipment & Vehicles Infrastructure Land Parks Technology Unfunded 41 17 0 1 18 3 Funded 24 27 82 1 3 15 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 The CITY of EDINA2019-23 CIP by Funding Source www.EdinaMN.gov 9 ConstructionFund HRA Fund Utility Fund:Sewer Utility Fund:Storm Utility Fund:Water CAS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees PACS Fund: Utility Franchise Fees Liquor Fund General Fund& Other Unfunded Funding Source 50,863 5,016 17,878 21,803 37,642 3,430 3,833 1,417 1,048 51,424 - 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 The CITY of EDINACIP Assumptions •Implementation of Approved CIP Strategy •Continued Utility Rate Increases: •- Water: 5% increases to user rates; 7% increase to WAC fees •- Sewer: 5% increases to user rates; 31% increase to SAC fee for 2019 (to $1,500) plus 6.5% annual increases •- Storm: 15% increase in 2019, and 8% increases thereafter. Alternate funding methods will be studied in 2019. www.EdinaMN.gov 10 The CITY of EDINAProjected CIP Levy Budget Budget Projection Projection Projection Projection 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Debt Service Fund Levies City Hall Debt Service 946,000 950,000 952,000 952,000 - - - Gymnasium Debt Service 388,000 389,000 390,000 391,000 392,000 392,000 392,000 Fire Station Debt Service 403,000 405,000 406,000 402,000 402,000 403,000 403,000 Public Works Facility Debt Service 1,696,000 1,667,000 1,695,000 1,688,000 1,695,000 1,694,000 1,692,000 Park Bond Market Value Levy - - - - - - - Sports Dome 1,162,500 1,168,700 1,168,900 1,163,300 1,162,400 1,168,400 1,166,200 Debt Service Fund Subtotal 4,595,500 4,579,700 4,611,900 4,596,300 3,651,400 3,657,400 3,653,200 Increase From Prior Year (%)-9.45% -0.34% 0.70% -0.34% -20.56% 0.16% -0.11% Construction Fund Levies Capital Improvement Plan Levy 101,550 327,000 300,000 800,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 1,950,000 Equipment Levy 1,750,000 1,840,000 1,930,000 2,030,000 2,130,000 2,240,000 2,350,000 Weber Woods NOTE 1 400,000 400,000 400,000 - - - - Construction Fund Subtotal 2,251,550 2,567,000 2,630,000 2,830,000 4,080,000 4,190,000 4,300,000 Increase From Prior Year (%)34.02% 14.01% 2.45% 7.60% 44.17% 2.70% 2.63% www.EdinaMN.gov 11 The CITY of EDINA2019 Proposed Property Taxes www.EdinaMN.gov 12 Source: Hennepin County 10/29/2018 Hennepin County 32% City of Edina 21% Edina School District 39% Watershed, Metro Districts, & Other 8% The CITY of EDINAPreliminary Tax Levy for 2019 www.EdinaMN.gov 13 Change Reason 4.2% Primary Drivers •Wages (3%) •City portion of employee health ins. (6.3%) •Service level changes (4 Firefighters) •Inflation & all other changes (2+%) 0.1% Increased Debt Service Levy 0.2% Increased Equipment levy of $90,000 0.1%Increased HRA levy of $35,000 4.6%Total 2019 City + HRA Levy increase The CITY of EDINAProperty Tax Ranges www.EdinaMN.gov 14 331 175 281 615 1,046 3,145 4,555 2,174 2,064 813 395 180 242 - 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 5,000 <($750) ($750 to $600) ($600 to $450) ($450 to $300) ($300 to $150) ($150 to $0) $0 to $150 $150 to $300 $300 to $450 $450 to $600 $600 to $750 $750 to $900 $900 > The CITY of EDINA2019 Estimated Levy Impacts •In 2018 the median home pays about $116 per month in property taxes to fund all City provided services. •Total EMV is increasing by about 6.4% for taxes payable in 2019. The median value single family home is now $530,650. •With a 4.6% property tax increase, the effect on the 2019 median valued home would be about a: •- 5.5% increase in City property taxes. •- $77 increase per year, or just over $6 per month. •- $123 payment per month in 2019 City property taxes. www.EdinaMN.gov 15 The CITY of EDINAAnnual Property Taxes www.EdinaMN.gov 16 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total City (2003 dollars)$843 $821 $841 $829 $870 $859 $854 $867 $869 $884 $927 $973 $991 $1,021 Total Tax (2003 dollars)$3,817 $3,770 $3,952 $3,930 $4,064 $4,147 $4,153 $4,333 $4,298 $4,347 $4,527 $4,872 $4,782 $4,922 Median Value $355,900 $385,100 $433,300 $444,800 $439,000 $432,700 $411,500 $403,100 $396,300 $399,700 $438,800 $457,300 $466,500 $501,000 $530,650 $843 $1,021 $3,817 $4,922 $- $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 "Median" Home Property Tax History Adjusted for CPI (2003 dollars) The CITY of EDINAAnnual Property Taxes www.EdinaMN.gov 17 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 City Tax $943 $1,013 $1,073 $1,113 $1,141 $1,086 $1,104 $1,127 $1,110 $1,094 Total Tax $4,550 $4,925 $5,365 $5,504 $5,610 $5,305 $5,475 $5,445 $5,345 $5,224 $943 $1,094 $4,550 $5,224 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $400,000 Home Property Tax History The CITY of EDINANext Steps •Public Hearing for 2019 Budget on Dec. 4. •Final Date to Take Action on 2019 Budget and CIP is Dec. 18. www.EdinaMN.gov 18 The CITY of EDINAQuestions/Discussion www.EdinaMN.gov 19 Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Cary Teague, Community Development Director Item Activity: Subject:Ordinance No. 2018-15, Resolution No. 2018- 116 & 2018-117; Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development plan for France Equities LLC at 7200 & 7250 France Avenue Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2018-15 and adopt Resolution No. 2018-116 and 2018-117 approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning & Preliminary Development Plan for 7200 & 7250 France Avenue. INTRODUCTION: On October 24, 2018 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan. Vote: 5 Ayes and 2 Nays. On November 7, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. The item was postponed for consideration to December 4, 2018. The applicant was asked to consider revising the plans to include recommendations of the City Council including the reduction of the height of the building. The applicant has revised the plans to reduce height and will present the changes at the meeting. T he revised plans are attached. The applicant has summarized the revisions as follows: - Eliminated the 7th floor. - Lowered 6th floor from 69' to 67'-5". - Lowered the datam line as established by the Southdale Working Group from 60' to 56'. - Increased building stepping by 20%. - Full 10' setback along France Ave and corners of 72nd and Gallagher for every building mass above 60'. - Added 25% more masonry material to the buildings facades. - Reduced the apparent height of the buildings from 67'-5" to 65'-5" due to First level being 2' below France Ave. and Gallagher DR. THESE ITEMS WERE ACOMPLISHED BY: - Reducing joists height in floors 2 through 6, from 24" to 18" while maintaining a 9' ceiling at the cost of approximately $500,000 due to shorter spans of wood framing. - Changed floors P2, P 1 and 1st level from precast to post tension concrete which reduced the height by 2' at the cost of $1,000,000. - Reduced First floor height from 16'-0" to 15'-0". Regarding questions about the Edina School District, the City and the District will be doing a joint demographic study on the present and future enrollment led by Hazel Reinhardt. In previous studies, Ms. Reinhardt has indicated that apartment buildings generate .1 students per apartment. That formula holds up as the 71 France apartments have 24 students in Edina Schools and there are 234 units. School District staff tells us that the number of students would not change the nature of education at Cornelia Elementary School. ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning Commission Staff Report Revised Plans Revised Plans - Comparison to the Original Ordinance No. 2018-15 AFO Review #1 AFO Review #2 Site Location, Comp. Plan & Setbacks Applicant Narrative (Response to Southdale Working Principles and sustainability questionaire) Sustainability Coordinator Memo City Engineer Memo Temporary Cell Pole Location Edina Chamber of Commerce Letter of Support Original Plans - Part 1 of 4 Original Plans - Part 2 of 4 Original Plans - Part 3 of 4 Original Plans - Part 4 of 4 Traffic Study Correspondence Resolution No. 2018-117 Preliminary Rezoning Resolution No. 2018-116 Comprehensive Plan The applicant, France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of both 7200 & 7250 France Avenue. As proposed the development would include the following: Two buildings that would be 6-7-stories, 68-86.5 feet tall, with 309 units of housing (apartments and rental townhomes) and underground parking. Units would range from 1 to 3 bedroom units. There would be 590 parking spaces for the uses. Up to 30,000 square feet of retail on the first level of each building. There would be 30 parking spaces adjacent to the retail uses behind the building. Each building would have 2 levels of underground parking. The Site Plan includes a north-south woonerf as shown in the Greater Southdale Framework as the western promenade. This area provides a vastly improved transition to the property to the west. (They woonerf would be 50-80 feet wide). A row of ten 2-3 story for-sale townhomes is proposed on the west side of the woonerf. At grade townhomes that would have street level entrances to 72nd and the new woonerf to activate the pedestrian areas. Twenty percent (20%) of the unit area would be for affordable housing at 60% AMI, which would meet the City’s Affordable Housing Policy. October 24, 2018 Planning Commission Cary Teague, Community Development Director Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Preliminary Rezoning, & Preliminary Development Plan for 7200 & 7250 France Avenue. Information / Background: STAFF REPORT Page 2 Sustainability. LEED or Green Globe designation would be pursued. Shared connections from France Avenue and Gallagher Drive. At grade townhomes that would have street level entrances to 72nd and the new woonerf to activate the pedestrian areas. Pedestrian and vehicular access is proposed around the perimeter if each building. Bike circulation through the site. Amenity terrace including a pool. Primary vehicle access points would be off France Avenue, Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street. A woonerf is proposed between 72nd and Gallagher and off France Avenue. The applicant has gone through the sketch plan process, and the Greater Southdale Area Development Principles were shared with the applicant. The City’s consultant for the Greater Southdale Area Plan, Mic Johnson of AFO, Architecture Field Office provided a sketch plan review as well. The applicant has responded to the development principles, AFO’s comments, and feedback received from the sketch plan, and has revised the plans as follows: Narrow the woonerf from 75-95 feet to 50-75 feet. Lower both corners to 60’ high by stepping back at 72nd street as well as Gallagher from six stories to five stories which achieved the recommended 60’ height in both corners of France Avenue. No individual garage doors along the woonerf and 72nd street. AFO has reviewed the revised plans (See attached memos dated October 17 & 18). To accommodate the request the following is required: Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 60 units per acre; and A Rezoning from POD-1, to PUD, Planned Unit Development. Attached is the city attorney’s “pyramid of discretion.” This project is within the “green” zone, meaning this is a legislative decision in which the City has significant discretion when reviewing this application. STAFF REPORT Page 3 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Senior Housing, Sunrise assisted living facility; zoned PSR-4, Planned Senior Citizen District and guided OR, Office Residential. Easterly: Macy’s Home Store; zoned PCD-3, Planned Commercial District and guided MXC, Mixed Use Center. Southerly: Office building; zoned POD-1, Planned Office District and guided OR, Office Residential. Westerly: Apartments; zoned PRD, Planned Residential District and guided High Density Residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.2 acres in size, contains two existing 4-story office buildings, a parking ramp, surface parking and a wooded area. The parking ramp is in an extremely poor condition. Planning Guide Plan designation: OR, Office Residential. Zoning: POD, Planned Office District Parking Based on the City Code requirement, Section 36-1311, 1 fully enclosed space and .75 surface spaces are required per dwelling unit. (1.75 spaces per unit.) Therefore, the 169 unit apartment would require 295 parking spaces; the 130 unit apartment would require 227 spaces; the 10 owner-occupied townhomes require 18 spaces; and the 30,000 square feet of retail requires 146 spaces. Therefore, 686 spaces are required between the two uses. The project would provide 590 parking stalls, 540 of which would be underground, and 30 would adjacent to the commercial uses and 20 would be for the owner occupied units. Wenck Associates conducted a parking study and determined that the proposed parking spaces would be adequate for the development. (See attached study.) Site Circulation/Access/Traffic Primary access to the proposed development would be off Gallagher Drive, France Avenue and 72nd Street. A right in and right out is proposed off France Avenue. This access would have to be approved by Hennepin County, as France Avenue is a County Road. The County has provided a preliminary review and found they would grant the access. The connections off Gallagher and France would reduce traffic on 72nd Street, which was required as part of a previous development proposal for the 7200 France site. To ensure that this access is available to the property to the north, access easements would be established over these drive aisles along the west and north lot lines. STAFF REPORT Page 4 Wenck Consulting also conducted a traffic study. The study concludes that the existing roadways can be supported by the project. The level of service at adjacent intersections would not be impacted. (See attached traffic study.) Landscaping Based on the perimeter of the site, 55 overstory trees would be required. The proposed plans show that over 100 new overstory trees would be planted. The existing 60 foot wide wooded area adjacent to 72nd street would remain as a buffer to the west neighborhood. A full complement of understory shrubs and bushes are also proposed. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined in the attached memo. A site improvement plan agreement would be required to outline public vs. private responsibilities and ownership for private improvement on public property. Any approvals of this project would be subject to review and approval of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, as they are the City’s review authority over the grading of the site. Building/Building Material The building materials would be a combination of stucco, architectural metal panels, stone, and glass, with metal panel accents. The applicant will have a materials board for review at the Planning Commission meeting. Mechanical Equipment Any rooftop and/or ground level equipment would have to be screened if visible from adjacent property lines. Loading Dock/Trash Enclosures Loading area and trash enclosures would be on the inside of the building/parking ramp. Shadow Study As requested at sketch plan, the applicant completed a shadow study to determine impacts the height of the buildings might have. As demonstrated, the biggest impact would be in the winter months and there would be no impact to nearby single-family homes. Building Height The building height requirement for this site is 4 stories and 48 feet. (See attached building height overlay district map.) The applicant is requesting flexibility from this standard through the PUD rezoning. STAFF REPORT Page 5 The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 86.5 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 348-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 460 feet, therefore would be code compliant. (See attached.) Living Streets/Multi-Modal Consideration Sec. 36-1274. - Sidewalks, trails and bicycle facilities. (a) In order to promote and provide safe and effective sidewalks and trails in the City and encourage the use of bicycles for recreation and transportation, the following improvements are required, as a condition of approval, on developments requiring the approval of a final development plan or the issuance of a conditional use permit pursuant to article V of this chapter: (1) It is the policy of the City to require the construction of sidewalks and trails wherever feasible so as to encourage pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the City. Therefore, developments shall provide sidewalks and trails which adjoin the applicant's property: a. In locations shown on the City's sidewalk and trail plan; and b. In other locations where the council finds that the provision of such sidewalks and trails enhance public access to mass transit facilities or connections to other existing or planned sidewalks, trails or public facilities. (2) Developments shall provide sidewalks between building entrances and sidewalks or trails which exist or which will be constructed pursuant to this section. (3) Developments shall provide direct sidewalk and trail connections with adjoining properties where appropriate. (4) Developments must provide direct sidewalk and trail connections to transit stations or transit stops adjoining the property. (5) Design standards for sidewalks and trails shall be prescribed by the engineer. (6) Nonresidential developments having an off-street automobile parking requirement of 20 or more spaces must provide off-street bicycle parking spaces where bicycles may be parked and secured from theft by their owners. The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces required shall be five percent of the automobile parking space requirement. The design and placement of bicycle parking spaces and bicycle racks used to secure bicycles shall be subject to the approval of the city engineer. Whenever possible, bicycle parking spaces shall be located within 50 feet of a public entrance to a principal building. (b) The expense of the improvements set forth in subsection (a) of this section shall be borne by the applicant. The proposal to add over 300 units of housing on France Avenue with extensive pedestrian walkway opportunities around the entire perimeter of the site would enhance the pedestrian experience in the area. The plans are consistent with the vision document for the Greater STAFF REPORT Page 6 Southdale Area by providing a 50 foot setback on France and 30 feet on Gallagher Drive. There would be dedicated bike storage and a bike maintenance area on the first level of the project. There would be pedestrian sidewalks around the perimeter of each building. COMPLIANCE TABLE While the applicant is proposing to rezone the site to PUD, the following table demonstrates compliance with the underlying zoning: *Not code compliant City Standard (POD-1) Proposed Building Setbacks Front – France Front – Gallagher Front – 72nd Street Front – 72nd (t-homes) Side – West (t-homes) Side – West (apartments) R-1 Property Setback 86.5 feet (based on height) 86.5 feet (based on height) 86.5 feet (based on height) 35 feet 35 feet 58 feet (based on height) Twice the building height from a 5-6 story building =116 feet required (based on 58 feet) Four times the height from R-1 for 7 story building = 344 required (based on 86.5 feet) 40 feet* (50 feet to curb) 20 feet* (30-50 feet to curb) 36-40 feet* (30-40 feet to curb) 25 feet* (30 to curb) 90 feet 50 feet* 320 feet 460 feet Building Height Four stories and 48 feet 7 stories and 86.5 feet* Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.0% 1.7%* Parking Stalls 309 enclosed (residential) 231 surface spaces 540 Total Residential 146 retail Total = 686 590 proposed* (540 underground) Parking Stall Size 8.5’ x 18’ 8.5 x 18’ STAFF REPORT Page 7 Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment – Density To accommodate the request, the following Comprehensive Plan amendment is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 60 units per acre. The Office Residential area is located west of France Avenue and into the Pentagon Park Area. The OR, Office Residential Area allows up to 30 units per acre. This density is low given the density that has been considered as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study. Densities that have been contemplated to date have been 80-100 units per acre over the whole of the district. The thinking behind that density has been to allow greater densities in between France and York (100- 150 units per acre; the CAC, Community Activity Center allows up to 105 units per acre, and the MXC, Mixed Use Center allows up to 150 units per acre in the existing Comprehensive Plan); and lesser densities 50-75 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. Below is table of existing high density developments in the City. Note that the trend in multi- family development is higher density. This is due to the high cost of land in Edina, the City’s requirement for affordable housing, and the added cost of redeveloping a site with existing buildings. High Density Development in Edina Development Address Units Units Per Acre Yorktown Continental 7151 York 264 45 The Durham 7201 York 264 46 York Plaza Condos 7200-20 York 260 34 York Plaza Apartments 7240-60 York 260 29 The Waters Colonial Drive 139 22 6500 France – Senior Housing 6500 France 188 80 Lennar - Onyx 6725 York 240 52 7250 France Project 7250 France 135 60 5000 France 5000 France 23 29 Hazelton Road Apartments 3650 Hazelton Road 186 150 Bus Garage – Trammel Crow Eden Avenue 165 100 STAFF REPORT Page 8 The Collaborative Market Street 131 46 Gateway Point 66th & York 191 96 The Millennium 66th & York 372 60 Lincoln Residences 5901 Lincoln Drive 250 30 Red – Indicates recent projects Example Residential Density Ranges in Surrounding City’s Comprehensive Plans City Range – Per Acre Bloomington Medium Density Residential 5-10 High Density Residential No limit General Business 0-83 Commercial (Community & Regional) 0-83 High Intense mix use 0-60 Airport South mix use 30-131 Richfield Medium Density Residential 7-12 High Density Residential Minimum of 24 High Density Res./Office Minimum of 24 Mixed Use 50+ St. Louis Park Medium Density Residential 6-30 High Density Residential 20-75 (PUD for high end) Mixed Use 20-75 (PUD for high end) Commercial 20-50 Minnetonka Medium Density Residential 4-12 High Density Residential 12+ Mixed Use No range established (density based on site location and site conditions.) Minneapolis Medium Density (mixed use) 20-50 High Density (mixed use) 50-120 Very High Density(mixed use) 120+ The site’s location on an arterial roadway provides a good location for higher density. The Comprehensive Plan currently suggests allowing higher density subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to STAFF REPORT Page 9 allow greater density would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. The proposed project would contain most of these elements. There is adequate utility capacity available. A traffic study was done by Wenck Associates and concludes that there would be minimal impact to the roads, and the existing roads could support the development. (See attached study.) Additionally, WSB did a traffic study of the entire Southdale area and contemplated densities higher than proposed. (See attached study.) Underground parking would be included; the at-grade parking lot would be behind the retail/office uses on the street; open space/public area is provided along the street fronts and the pedestrian and vehicle access along the north and west lot lines. Affordable housing is proposed to exceed the City of Edina policy by providing 20% of the units as affordable. The trade-off in allowing more height and density includes: A more creative site plan with improved site circulation and public space; Collaborative design with parcel to the north (7200 France). The plans allow access for the 7200 parcel to take traffic to be away from 72nd and the low density residential area to the north and west; Underground and hidden parking; Improved pedestrian and vehicle access and connections; Significant affordable housing provided within the development; Pedestrian and bicycle oriented design would include bike and pedestrian paths through the site to connect to the north and along France and Gallagher. The amendment to the Comprehensive Plan could be accomplished as follows: OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The City Council may approve a project for up to 60 units per acre through a PUD rezoning at 7200 & 7250 France Avenue. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, meeting the city’s Affordable Housing Policy, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, underground parking, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. STAFF REPORT Page 10 Planned Unit Development (PUD) Per Section 36-253 the following are the regulations for a PUD: 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The purpose and intent of a PUD is to include most or all of the following: a. provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City; c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new technologies in building design, special construction materials, landscaping, lighting, stormwater management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses; d. ensure high quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities; f. preserve and enhance site characteristics including natural features, wetland protection, trees, open space, scenic views, and screening; g. allow for mixing of land uses within a development; h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and i. ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The proposal would meet the purpose and intent of the PUD, as most all of the above criteria would be met. The site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for “Office Residential” which allows for retail, office and housing. The proposal is a high quality residential development that would enhance the surrounding area and add pedestrian activity to the STAFF REPORT Page 11 area with housing on France Avenue. The proposed buildings would be a high quality architectural metal, stone and glass. The proposal would meet the City’s affordable housing policy to help provide additional affordable housing within the City. 2. Applicability/Criteria a. Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses, conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in this Chapter shall be treated as potentially allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed uses are all consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As mentioned, the site is designated as OR, Office Residential, which encourages a mixture of uses. Uses include: Offices, attached or multifamily housing. Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all development should be in compliance with the following: i. where the site of a proposed PUD is designated for more than one (1) land use in the Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; This project would be a true mixed use development with residential, retail and office uses. ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or housing type may be permitted provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; As mentioned, the proposal includes vertical mixed uses. iii. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; and The proposal is to increase the allowed density in the OR District in the Comp. Plan. The uses proposed are consistent with the uses allowed in the OR District. The Comprehensive Plan encourages mixed use. The Wenck Traffic study concludes that the surrounding roadways could support the use. STAFF REPORT Page 12 iv. the setback regulation, building coverage and floor area ratio of the most closely related conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above. The table on page 6 shows how the proposed new buildings would comply with the POD Zoning Ordinance Standards and the zoning standard in the new PUD-19 District. Flexibility is requested in regard to building height, setbacks, FAR and parking standards. In relaxing these standards, the purpose and intent, as described in #1 above would be met. The area would be vastly improved from existing conditions on the site. The blighted parking ramp would be removed. The provision of housing on France Avenue would increase pedestrian activity on France Avenue. The use will bring more vibrancy to the area with a true mixed use project. The applicant is providing twenty percent of the units for affordable housing within the project. PRIMARY ISSUES/STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposed amendment is reasonable for the following reasons: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I- 494. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-100 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre, and the MXC, Mixed Use Center allows up to 150 units per acre; and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units, which would help the city to achieve its affordable housing goals. The current Metropolitan Council goal for Edina is to build 878 new units by 2030. STAFF REPORT Page 13 5. Traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. • Is the proposal reasonable to justify the PUD rezoning of the site? Yes. Staff believes the PUD is justified for the following reasons: 1. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Improved pedestrian and bike experience at street level; Public art; and Affordable housing within the project. (20%) 2. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. STAFF REPORT Page 14 f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 3. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. (See pages 10-12 of this report.) In summary the PUD zoning would: a. Creates a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 4. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 86.5 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 348 foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 460 feet, therefore would be code compliant. 5. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. Wenck Associates conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. STAFF REPORT Page 15 Staff Recommendation Comprehensive Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the requests for Comprehensive Plan Amendments as follows: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase the density in the OR, Office Residential District in the Greater Southdale Area from 30 units per acre to 60 units per acre at 7200 & 7250 France Avenue; and Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I- 494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-100 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre, and the MXC, Mixed Use Center allows up to 150 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units, which would help the city to achieve its affordable housing goals. The current Metropolitan Council goal for Edina is to build 878 new units by 2030. 5. The traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. Preliminary Rezoning to PUD & Preliminary Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from POD, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for 7200 & 7250 France Avenue. Approval is subject to the following findings: STAFF REPORT Page 16 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass, designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Improved pedestrian and bike experience at street level; Public art; and Twenty percent (20%) of the project would dedicated for affordable housing within the project. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian- scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. STAFF REPORT Page 17 v. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. vi. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. vii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. viii. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over six-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. Within the underlying POD zoning district, the Edina City Code requires that buildings seven-stories tall be setback four times the height of the building from the property line of single family homes. The building height is 86.5 feet in the seven story portion of the building; therefore a 348-foot setback is required. The distance as proposed would be 460 feet, therefore would be code compliant. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 8. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 9. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated September 25, 2018, and the materials board as presented to the Planning Commission. Final Plans must be consistent with Architecture Field Office recommendations dated October 17, 2018 regarding building setbacks over 60 feet. The building above 60 feet in height must be stepped in 10 feet. STAFF REPORT Page 18 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. County approval of the right-in, right out on France Avenue. 9. Of the proposed housing units, 20% of the area must be dedicated for affordable housing and meet the conditions of the City’s affordable housing policy. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated October 19, 2018. 11. Compliance with the Wenck Associates Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 12. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 13. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. 14. Dedication of public access easements along the west and north lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the property to the north, 7200 France Avenue. 15. Final Plans must be consistent with Architecture Field Office recommendations dated October 17, 2018 regarding building setbacks over 60 feet. The building above 60 feet in height must be stepped in 10 feet. Deadline for a city decision: January 15, 2018 7200 & 7250 FRANCE AVE7200-7250 FRANCE AVE. NORTH, EDINA, MINNESOTACITY SUBMITTALPROJECT TEAMOWNEROWNERARCHITECTDJR Architecture, Inc.333 Washington Avenue NUnion Plaza, Suite 210Minneapolis, MN 55401Contact: Sheldon Berg, AIA LEED AP612.676.2700612.676.2796 (fax)sberg@djr-inc.comLANDSCAPECIVILFrance Equities, LLC10296 182nd St. WestLakeville, MN 55044Civil Site Group4931 W. 35th Street,Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416Contact: David Knaeble, PE.763.234.7523Dknaeble@civilsitegroup.comConfluence530 North Third Street,Suite 120Minneapolis, MN 55401Contact: Brad Aldrich, PLA LEED AP BD+C, ASLA612.333.3702 X503BAldrich@thinkconfluence.comPARKINGLEVEL P2LEVEL P1TOWNHOMES (LEVEL P1)7200 (LEVEL 1)7250 (LEVEL 1)SPACES270270201614590TOTALARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONG000COVER SHEETEDINA, MINNESOTA17-124RW7200&7250FranceAve.ApproverDesignerSHEET INDEXPRE 1.00LEVELS P1 & P2PRE 1.01LEVEL 1PRE 1.02LEVEL 2PRE 1.03LEVEL 3PRE 1.04LEVEL 4PRE 1.05LEVEL 5PRE 1.06LEVEL 6PRE 1.07LEVEL 7PRE 2.00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - 7200PRE 2.01EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - 7250PRE 2.02EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - TOWNHOMES7200 FRANCE 11/19/2018STUDIO1B1B+DEN2B2B+DEN3BTH(RENTAL)MEZZ.UNITTOTALUNIT SF BY LEVELPARKINGCIRCULATIONAMENITYRETAIL ARETAIL BTOTALL1141411,252 15,744 3,879 2,801 5,750 6,178 45,604 182,6233456182L053,4 5,804534,63 149,62433014173L981,4 31,130 149,62433014174L981,4 31,130 149,62433014175L981,4 31,130 559,7122301456L437,3 21,689 MEZZ. - 171410061542643LATOT TINU136,311 15,744 24,530 8,605 5,750 6,178 197,118 52075085011001200130087540021.7%39.5%28.7%10.2%0.0%0.0%N/AN/A100.0%TOWNHOUSES (OWNED)11/19/2018TH(OWNED)UNIT SF BY LEVEL011L12,500 L212,500 01LATOT TINU25,000- - 25,000 AVERAGE UNIT AREA25007250 FRANCE 11/19/2018STUDIO1B1B+DEN2B2B+DEN3BTH(RENTAL)MEZZ.UNITTOTALUNIT SF BY LEVELPARKINGCIRCULATIONAMENITYRETAIL CRETAIL DL1887,079 10,682 3,275 1,162 4,755 11,291 38,244 673,8191116472L083,3 7,276230,92 678,32822527123L429,3 27,800 678,32822527124L429,3 27,800 729,22723425135L998,3 26,826 657,7102173546L735,3 21,293 MEZZ. - 03182872311611LATOT TINU113,890 10,682 21,939 8,438 4,755 11,291 170,995 5207508501100120013008754009.0%50.0%10.7%22.1%6.6%1.6%N/AN/A100.0%UNIT TYPESF TOTALUNIT TYPESF TOTALSF TOTALAVERAGE UNIT AREAUNIT MIXAVERAGE UNIT AREAUNIT MIXUNIT TYPEPARKFloorUseGSFAptsTH UnitsParkSpaces072554,511gnikraP2P072554,511gnikraP1P03gnikraP102gnikraPemohnwoT renwOTOTAL230,910095 ELEVATOR LOBBYELEV.RESIDENTIAL ELEVATOR ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CTRASH /RECYCLING MECH.STAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CMECH.MECH.UPUP30' - 9"20' - 0"75' - 2 1/2"220' - 10"27' - 4 1/2"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0 1/2"258' - 7 1/2"476' - 8"RESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEV.24' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 5"24' - 5"25' - 0"TOWNHOME GARAGESTOWNHOME GARAGES19' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"26' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"STORAGEMECH.STAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CMECH.MECH.UPRESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEV.19' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"26' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"STORAGEELEVATOR LOBBYELEV.RESIDENTIAL ELEVATOR ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR BSTAIR CTRASH /RECYCLING MECH.UPMECH.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.00LEVELS P1 & P2EDINA, MINNESOTA17-12411/19/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver11/19/2018Designer 3/64" = 1'-0"B1LEVEL P1 3/64" = 1'-0"A1LEVEL P2 ELEVATOR LOBBYRETAILELEVATORRESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CRESIDENTIAL TRASHCOMMERCIAL TRASHRESIDENCE LOBBYRETAILRETAILPARKING14 SPACESTOWNHOMES FOR RENTDOWNSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR C34' - 10"52' - 4 1/2"283' - 6"39' - 0 1/2"50' - 10"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0 1/2"24' - 8 1/2"259' - 6 1/2"114' - 5 1/2"25' - 2"69' - 10"35' - 5"475' - 10"20' - 11 1/2"RESIDENTIAL TRASHCOMMERCIAL TRASHRESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS RESIDENCE LOBBYTOWNHOMES FOR RENTTOWNHOMES FOR RENTRETAILRETAILRETAIL ELEVATORTOWNHOMES FOR SALETOWNHOMES FOR SALEPARKING16 SPACESBIKE PARK AND RIDE188' - 7 1/2"52' - 1 1/2"237' - 0 1/2"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.01LEVEL 1EDINA, MINNESOTA17-12411/19/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver11/19/2018Designer DNDNTRASH/REC.ELEC.STORAGEAMENITY SPACERESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSOUTDOOR COURTYARDAPARTMENTSAMENITY SPACEOUTDOOR COURTYARDAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR C52' - 4 1/2"283' - 6"50' - 10"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0 1/2"24' - 8 1/2"259' - 6 1/2"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGEELEV.ELEV.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.02LEVEL 2EDINA, MINNESOTA17-12411/19/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver11/19/2018Designer TRASH/REC.ELEC.STORAGERESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSOUTDOOR PATIO.APARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR C197' - 8 1/2"475' - 10"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGEELEV.ELEV.TERRACESTERRACESOUTDOOR PATIO.OUTDOOR BALCONYARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.03LEVEL 3EDINA, MINNESOTA17-12411/19/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver11/19/2018Designer TRASH/REC.ELEC.STORAGERESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR BSTAIR C197' - 8 1/2"198' - 6 1/2"65' - 7 1/2"475' - 10"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGEELEV.ELEV.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.04LEVEL 4EDINA, MINNESOTA17-12411/19/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver11/19/2018Designer TRASH/REC.ELEC.STORAGERESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR BSTAIR C197' - 8 1/2"189' - 1"475' - 10"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGESTAIR AELEV.ELEV.OUTDOOR PATIO ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.05LEVEL 5EDINA, MINNESOTA17-12411/19/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver11/19/2018Designer TRASH/REC.ELEC.RESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR BSTAIR C197' - 8 1/2"231' - 5 1/2"180' - 8 1/2"188' - 11 1/2"65' - 7 1/2"475' - 10"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGEELEV.ELEV.OUTDOOR PATIO.OUTDOOR PATIO.OUTDOOR PATIO.OUTDOOR PATIO.APARTMENTSOUTDOOR PATIO.STAIR COUTDOOR PATIO.OUTDOOR PATIO.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.06LEVEL 6EDINA, MINNESOTA17-12411/19/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver11/19/2018Designer LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"STUCCOSTUCCOFIBERGLASS WINDOWSBRICK VENEERALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOBRICK VENEERALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL PANELSTONEBRICK VENEERROOF167' - 5 3/8"BRICK VENEERBRICKMETAL SHINGLEALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELALUMINUM RAILINGSTUCCOMETAL PANELARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTONEFIBERGLASS WINDOWSFIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM STOREFRONTBRICK VENEERFIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM RAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"BRICK VENEERALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL SHINGLEFIBERGLASS WINDOWMETAL PANELALUMINUM RAILINGROOF167' - 5 3/8"ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTUCCOSTONEALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM RAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTBRICK VENEERALUMINUM STOREFRONTBRICK VENEERSTUCCOMETAL SHINGLESTONEALUMINUM STOREFRONTARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTFIBERGLASS WINDOWALUMINUM RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELMETAL SHINGLESSTONEALUMINUM RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWALUMINUM STORFRONTBRICK VENEERLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"ROOF167' - 5 3/8"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"ROOF167' - 5 3/8"STUCCOBRICK VENEERALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL SHINGLESTONEFIBERGLASS WINDOWALUMINUM RAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOALUMINUM RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWBRICK VENEERARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 2.00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCITY, STATE17-12411/19/2018RW7200 FRANCEApprover11/19/2018Designer 1/16" = 1'-0"B1EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A1NORTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B2WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A2SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A4INTERNAL SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B4INTERNAL EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B3INTERNAL WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A3INTERNAL NORTH ELEVATION LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"STUCCOFIBERGLASSWINDOWSMETAL PANELARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTUCCOMETAL PANELALUMINUM RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWSOPEN TO GARAGEALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL SHINGLEBRICKROOF167' - 5 3/8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"GLASS RAILINGSBRICK VENEERFIBERGLASS WINDOWSSTUCCO (BEYOND)STUCCOALUMINUM RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWSARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDINGGLASS RAILINGBRICK VENEERALUMINUM STOREFRONTFIBERGLASS WINDOWSGLASS RAILINGSTONEALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOMETAL SHINGLESTONEBRICK VENEERROOF167' - 5 3/8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"STUCCOALUMINUM BALCONY RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWSGLASS RAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTONEMETAL PANEL ENTRYALUMINUM STOREFRONTBRICK VENEERSTUCCOGLASS RAILING ON ALUMINUM BALCONYARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELBRICK VENEERBRICK VENEERALUMINUM STOREFRONTFIBERGLASS WINDOWSMETAL PANEL ENTRYROOF167' - 5 3/8"BRICK VENEERLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"LEVEL P2?FIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM BALCONY RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDINGMETAL SHINGLESTONEBRICK VENEERSTUCCOGLASS RAILING ON ALUMINUM BALCONYARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWSFIBERGLASS INDOWSMETAL SHINGLEBRICK11' - 5 1/2"ROOF167' - 5 3/8"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"ALUMINUM RAILINGSARCHITECTURALMETAL PANELFIBERGLASS WINDOWSSTUCCOGLASS RAILINGSROOF167' - 5 3/8"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"STUCCOALUMINUM BALCONY AND RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWSSTUCCOROOF167' - 5 3/8"LEVEL 2114' - 0"LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4"LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2"ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWSROOF167' - 5 3/8"BRICK VENEERARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 2.01EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEDINA, MN17-12411/19/2018AuthorChecker7250 FRANCE MIXED USEApprover11/19/2018Designer 1/16" = 1'-0"A2NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A1SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A4EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B4WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B3EAST COURTYARD 1/16" = 1'-0"B2NORTH COURTYARD 1/16" = 1'-0"B1WEST COURTYARD STUCCOMETAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWSARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTUCCOMETAL PANELALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING23' - 3 3/4"9' - 7 7/8"32' - 11 5/8"METAL PANELSTUCCOARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWSBRICKARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTUCCOSTUCCOSTUCCOSTUCCOSTUCCOMETAL PANELMETAL PANELBRICKARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWSARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELBRICKALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING10' - 7 7/8"12' - 7 7/8"9' - 7 7/8"32' - 11 5/8"STUCCOFIBERGLASS INDOWSARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELBRICK9' - 7 7/8"23' - 3 3/4"32' - 11 5/8"METAL PANELSTUCCOARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWSBRICKARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTUCCOSTUCCOSTUCCOSTUCCOSTUCCOMETAL PANELMETAL PANELBRICKARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWS10' - 7 7/8"12' - 7 7/8"9' - 7 7/8"32' - 11 5/8"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 2.02EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCITY, STATE18-00011/19/2018AuthorChecker7200 FRANCEApprover11/19/2018Designer 1/8" = 1'-0"F7NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"F5EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"F3SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"F1WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue PROJECT REVISIONS Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue Height Diagram Comparison Height Diagram @ November 7 City Council Meeting Height Diagram - CurrentEdina, MN November 7, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue 79'69' 69' 58' 58' 48' 24' 24' 16' 16' 69' 24' 58' 24' Height Proportion 79' 0"7.00% 69' 0"44.00% 58' 0"17.00% 48' 0"2.00% 24' 0"8.00% 16' 0"22.00% Total 100% 58'48' Height Diagram 56' 56' 45'-5" 24'-5" 24'-5" 14' 14' 67'-5" 24'-5" 56' 24' 56'45'-5" 67'-5" 56' APPARENT HEIGHT 65'-5" DUE TO FIRST LEVEL BEING 2' BELOW FRANCE AVE AND GALLAGHER DR. Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue North East View - Height Comparison • 7th Floor @ 79’-0” • Partial step back on 6th floor • Metal Panels on street level • Metal Panels on upper levels • 6th Floor @ 67’-5” • Full step back on 6th floor • Stone on street level • Brick added on upper levels CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 7TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH 58'-0"79'-0" 58'-0" 69'-0" 56'-0" 67'-5" 56'-0" 67'-5" 69'-0" 56'-0" Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue South East View - Height Comparison • 7th Floor @ 79’-0” • Partial step back on 6th floor • Metal Panels on street level • Metal Panels on upper levels • 6th Floor @ 67’-5” • Full step back on 6th floor • Stone on street level • Brick added on upper levels CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 7TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH 58'-0" 79'-0" 58'-0" 69'-0" 58'-0" 56'-0" 67'-5" 56'-0" 67'-5" 56'-0" 69'-0" Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue • 7th Floor @ 79’-0” • Partial step back on 6th floor • Metal Panels on street level • Metal Panels on upper levels • 6th Floor @ 67’-5” • Full step back on 6th floor • Stone on street level • partial Brick on upper levels South West View - Height Comparison CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 7TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH 58'-0" 79'-0" 69'-0" 58'-0" 67'-5" 67'-5" 67'-5" 56'-0" 56'-0" 56'-0" 69'-0" 58'-0" 56'-0" Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue • 7th Floor @ 79’-0” • Partial step back on 6th floor • Metal Panels on street level • Metal Panels on upper levels • 6th Floor @ 67’-5” • Full step back on 6th floor • Stone on street level • Brick added on upper levels North West View - Height Comparison 69'-0" 79'-0" 69'-0" 69'-0" 58'-0" 58'-0" 67'-5" 67'-5" 67'-5" 67'-5" 56'-0" 56'-0" CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 7TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue South East View - Height Comparison • 7th Floor @ 79’-0” • Partial step back on 6th floor • Metal Panels on street level • Metal Panels on upper levels • 6th Floor @ 67’-5” • Full step back on 6th floor • Stone on street level • Brick added on upper levels CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 7TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL 3126' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4136' - 11 3/4" ROOF TRUSS BEARING177' - 11 1/4" LEVEL 5147' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6157' - 11 1/2" LEVEL 7168' - 5 3/8" STUCCO STUCCO FIBERGLASS WINDOWSMETAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO STUCCO METAL PANEL METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL PANEL BRICK METAL SHINGLE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL ALUMINUM RAILING STUCCO METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS WINDOWS FIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBERGLASS WINDOWS FIBERGLASS WINDOWS ALUMINUM RAILING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL 3126' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4136' - 11 3/4" ROOF TRUSS BEARING177' - 11 1/4" LEVEL 5147' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6157' - 11 1/2" LEVEL 7168' - 5 3/8" ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL SHINGLE BRICK FIBERGLASS WINDOW METAL PANEL ALUMINUM RAILING ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM RAILING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL PANEL STUCCO METAL SHINGLE BRICK ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBERGLASS WINDOW ALUMINUM RAILING Copyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncIssue:3 2 1 PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 2.00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCITY, STATE7200FRANCE 1/16" = 1'-0"B1 EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B2 WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A2 SOUTH ELEVATION 79'-0" 69'-0" 79'-0" 69'-0" 69'-0" 79'-0" 69'-0" 79'-0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" STUCCO STUCCO FIBERGLASS WINDOWSBRICK VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO BRICK VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL PANEL STONE BRICK VENEER ROOF167' - 5 3/8" BRICK VENEER BRICK METAL SHINGLE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL ALUMINUM RAILING STUCCO METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STONE FIBERGLASS WINDOWS FIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM STOREFRONT BRICK VENEER FIBERGLASS WINDOWS ALUMINUM RAILING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" BRICK VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL SHINGLE FIBERGLASS WINDOW METAL PANEL ALUMINUM RAILING ROOF167' - 5 3/8" ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO STONE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM RAILING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BRICK VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BRICK VENEER STUCCO METAL SHINGLE STONE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBERGLASS WINDOW ALUMINUM RAILING ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL SHINGLES STONE ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOW ALUMINUM STORFRONT BRICK VENEER LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" ROOF167' - 5 3/8" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" ROOF167' - 5 3/8" STUCCO BRICK VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL SHINGLE STONE FIBERGLASS WINDOW ALUMINUM RAILING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOW BRICK VENEER ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA 6 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE 5 4 3 2 1 PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 2.00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCITY, STATE17-12411/19/2018RW7200FRANCEApprover11/19/2018Designer 1/16" = 1'-0"B1 EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A1 NORTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B2 WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A2 SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A4 INTERNAL SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B4 INTERNAL EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B3 INTERNAL WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A3 INTERNAL NORTH ELEVATION • 7th Floor @ 79’-0” • Partial step back on 6th floor • Metal Panels on street level • Metal Panels on upper levels • 6th Floor @ 67’-5” • Full step back on 6th floor • Stone on street level • Brick added on upper levels 7200 Elevation - Height Comparison 56'-0"67'-5"67'-5"56'-0"67'-5" 56'-0"67'-5"67'-5"56'-0" CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 7TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL P189' - 4" LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8" LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4" LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8" LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2" LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8" STUCCO FIBERGLASSWINDOWS METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO METAL PANEL ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS OPEN TO GARAGE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL SHINGLE BRICK 26' - 7 7/8"21' - 3 3/4"10' - 7 7/8"10' - 1 7/8"68' - 9 3/8"75' - 3 3/8"58' - 7 1/2"LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL P189' - 4" LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8" LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4" LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8" LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2" LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8" LEVEL P278' - 4" GLASS RAILINGS METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS WINDOWS STUCCO (BEYOND) STUCCO ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWSARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDING GLASS RAILING METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBERGLASS WINDOWS GLASS RAILING METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO METAL SHINGLE BRICK32' - 11 5/8"26' - 7 7/8"METAL PANEL LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL P189' - 4" LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8" LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4" LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8" LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2" LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8" LEVEL P278' - 4" STUCCO ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING ARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS GLASS RAILING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO METAL PANEL METAL PANEL ENTRY ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL PANEL STUCCO GLASS RAILING ON ALUMINUM BALCONY ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL METAL PANEL METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBERGLASS WINDOWS METAL PANEL ENTRY71' - 3 3/8"LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL P189' - 4" LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8" LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4" LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8" LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2" LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8" LEVEL P278' - 4" FIBERGLASS WINDOWS ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING ARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDING METAL SHINGLE BRICK METAL PANEL STUCCO GLASS RAILING ON ALUMINUM BALCONY ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS INDOWS FIBERGLASS INDOWS METAL SHINGLE BRICK 32' - 11 5/8"26' - 7 7/8"11' - 5 1/2" LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8" LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4" LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8" LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2" LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8" ALUMINUM RAILINGS ARCHITECTURALMETAL PANEL FIBERGLASS WINDOWS STUCCO 55' - 3 3/8"GLASS RAILINGS LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8" LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4" LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8" LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2" LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8" STUCCO ALUMINUM BALCONY AND RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS STUCCO LEVEL 2116' - 0" LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8" LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4" LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8" LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2" LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8" ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS INDOWS 43' - 7 1/2"ARCH Copyright 2018 DJR Architecture, Inc6 333 Was Minnea 612.67 CLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVIL5 4 3 2 1 PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 2.01EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEDINA, MN17-1248.3.18AuthorChecker7250 FRANCE MIXED USEApprover8.3.18Designer 1/16" = 1'-0"1 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"2 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"7 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"8 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"3 EAST COURTYARD 1/16" = 1'-0"4 NORTH COURTYARD 1/16" = 1'-0"5 WEST COURTYARD L4 3) STUCCO FIBERGLASSWINDOWS METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO METAL PANEL ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS OPEN TO GARAGE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL SHINGLE BRICK 26' - 7 7/8"21' - 3 3/4"10' - 7 7/8"10' - 1 7/8"68' - 9 3/8"75' - 3 3/8"58' - 7 1/2" 1/16" = 1'-0"1 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION GLASS RAILINGS METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS WINDOWS STUCCO (BEYOND) STUCCO ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWSARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDING GLASS RAILING METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBERGLASS WINDOWS GLASS RAILING METAL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO METAL SHINGLE BRICK32' - 11 5/8"26' - 7 7/8"METAL PANEL 69'-0"69'-0" 69'-0"69'-0" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" STUCCO FIBERGLASSWINDOWS METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO METAL PANEL ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS OPEN TO GARAGE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL SHINGLE BRICK ROOF167' - 5 3/8" GLASS RAILINGS STUCCO ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWSSTUCCO BRICK VENEERROOF167' - 5 3/8" LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" STUCCO ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING ARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS GLASS RAILING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STONE METAL PANEL ENTRY ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BRICK VENEER STUCCO GLASS RAILING ON ALUMINUM BALCONY ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL BRICK VENEER BRICK VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBERGLASS WINDOWS METAL PANEL ENTRY ROOF167' - 5 3/8" BRICK VENEER LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" LEVEL P2? FIBERGLASS WINDOWS ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING ARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDING METAL SHINGLE STONE BRICK VENEER STUCCO GLASS RAILING ON ALUMINUM BALCONY ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS INDOWS FIBERGLASS INDOWS METAL SHINGLE BRICK 11' - 5 1/2" ROOF167' - 5 3/8" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" ALUMINUM RAILINGS ARCHITECTURALMETAL PANEL FIBERGLASS WINDOWS STUCCO GLASS RAILINGS ROOF167' - 5 3/8" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" STUCCO ALUMINUM BALCONY AND RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS STUCCO ROOF167' - 5 3/8"ARCHITECTURE, INCA 6 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE 5 4 3 2 PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONON17-12411/19/2018AuthorCheckerEApprover11/19/2018Designer 1/16" = 1'-0"A2 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A4 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B4 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B3 EAST COURTYARD 1/16" = 1'-0"B2 NORTH COURTYARD LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" STUCCO FIBERGLASSWINDOWS METAL PANEL ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO METAL PANEL ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS OPEN TO GARAGE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT METAL SHINGLE BRICK ROOF167' - 5 3/8" 1/16" = 1'-0"A2 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION LEVEL 1100' - 0" LEVEL 2114' - 0" LEVEL 3124' - 5 7/8" LEVEL 4134' - 11 3/4" LEVEL 5145' - 5 5/8" LEVEL 6155' - 11 1/2" GLASS RAILINGS BRICK VENEER FIBERGLASS WINDOWS STUCCO (BEYOND) STUCCO ALUMINUM RAILING FIBERGLASS WINDOWS ARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDING GLASS RAILING BRICK VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT FIBERGLASS WINDOWS GLASS RAILING STONE ALUMINUM STOREFRONT STUCCO METAL SHINGLE STONE BRICK VENEERROOF167' - 5 3/8" 1/16" = 1'-0"A1 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION • 7th Floor @ 79’-0” • Partial step back on 6th floor • Metal Panels on street level • Metal Panels on upper levels • 6th Floor @ 67’-5” • Full step back on 6th floor • Stone on street level • Brick added on upper levels 7250 Elevation - Height Comparison 67'-5"67'-5"56'-0"67'-5" 67'-5"56'-0"56'-0"67'-5" CITY COUNCIL MEETING, NOVEMBER 7TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING, DECEMBER 4TH Edina, MN December 4, 2018 17-124.01 7200 - 7250 France Avenue PROJECT REVISIONS RECAP - Eliminated 7th floor at 79'. - Lowered 6th floor from 69' to 67'-5". - Lowered the datam line as established by the Southdale Working Group from 60' to 56'. - Increased building stepping by 20%. - Full 10' setback along France Ave and corners of 72nd and Gallagher for every building mass above 60'. - Added 25% more masonry material to the buildings facades. - Reduced the apparent height of the buildings from 67'-5" to 65'-5" due to First level being 2' below France Ave. and Gallagher DR. THESE ITEMS WERE ACOMPLISHED BY: - Reducing joists height in floors 2 through 6, from 24" to 18" while maintaining a 9' ceiling at the cost of approximately $500,000 due to shorter spans of wood framing. - Changed floors P2, P1 and 1st level from precast to post tension concrete which reduced the height by 2' at the cost of $1,000,000. - Reduced First floor height from 16'-0" to 15'-0". DRAFT ORDINANCE FOR CONSIDERATION DECEMBER 4, 2018 ORDINANCE NO. 2018-15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH THE PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-15 ZONING DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Chapter 36, Article VIII, Division 4 is hereby amended to add the following: Sec. 36-507 Planned Unit Development District-15 (PUD-15) (a) Legal description: Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition, Hennepin County. The North 325 Feet of the East 520 Feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Except Road. (7200 & 7250 France Avenue) (b) Approved Plans. Incorporated herein by reference are the re-development plans, including the master development plan for the site received by the City on _________, 2018 except as amended by City Council Resolution No. 2018-___ on file in the Office of the Planning Department. (c) Principal Uses: All uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District Multi-family Apartments/Townhomes/Condos. (d) Accessory Uses: All accessory uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (e) Conditional Uses: All conditional uses allowed in the PCD-2 Zoning District. (f) Development Standards. In addition to the development standards per the PCD-2 Zoning District, the following shall apply: Required Building Setbacks Front – France Front – Gallagher Front – 72nd Street (apartments) Front – 72nd Street (townhomes) Side – West (townhomes) Side – West (apartments) 40 feet 20 feet 35 feet 25 feet 90 feet 50 feet Building Height 6 stories and 67 feet (Building to be constructed per the approved plans) 2 Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 1.8% Parking Stalls 590 stalls required (Per the approved plans) Parking Stall Size 8.5 x 18’ Drive Aisle Width 24 feet (g) Signs shall be regulated per the PCD Zoning District. (h) Twenty percent (20%) of the dwelling units in the building shall be dedicated for affordable housing at 60% or less of area median gross income, for a minimum of 15 years from the date of certificate of occupancy. Section 2. This ordinance is effective upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date October 17,2018 Cary: At your request, we reviewed the most recent submission for the 7200-7250 France Avenue parcels based on our experience working with the Greater Southdale Work Group to craft a physical vision for how their guiding principles may translate to the built environment. We believe many aspects of this plan align with the overarching planning and design ideas set forth in the Greater Southdale District Planning Framework. However, as you are aware, the translation of that vision to a broader district plan and districtwide Design Experience Guidelines is still in process. Based on this month’s Work Group meeting, we are further refining the overall district goals related to building height and form, particularly as it relates to critical transition areas between the single-family residences to the west of France Avenue and the more commercially- focused Southdale district to the east. These latest conversations are summarized below. •The sub-district to the west side of France between 69th and Gallagher is a unique transition zone within the overall Southdale district. Any proposed developments within that zone and should be approached with special sensitivity. •As illustrated in the section below, within this transition zone, building heights will step up incrementally, from those that are adjacent to single family homes to those that are facing France Avenue to provide a more gradual transition from the residential neighborhood to the Southdale District. •The West Promenade, a new north-south shared pedestrian, bike and vehicle street/woonerf that accommodates service access, is intended to support the transition from townhouses and other residential buildings on the west side of the West Promenade, to taller buildings on the east side of the West Promenade. •New buildings that are adjacent to single family residential properties, on the west side of the West Promenade, should not exceed 36’ in height. Townhomes are the preferred residential typology in this area of the transition zone. •On the east side of the West Promenade, building faces should not exceed 50’ in height. •On France Avenue, building faces should not exceed 60’ in height. As a point of comparison, that is the height of a typical 4-story office building. Should the City choose to permit height above that 60’ height limit, it is our recommendation that any additional floor above 60’ step back from the face of the building by a minimum of 10 feet. •On the following pages, we have a few comments related to the details set forth in the plan. These comments are based on the visual information provided to the City by DJR Architects, with corresponding diagrams to help illustrate points. 50’ height limit Mixed Use Buildings Neighborhood Street or Back Yard West Promenade 60’ wide France Avenue Single Family Residence Townhouses Mixed Use Buildings 60’ height limit 36’ height limit Recommended width for the West Promenade (Woonerf) is 60’. This proposal is at 75’. Additional building footprint brought to the edge of the West Promenade (Woonerf) Street Rooms Creating defined “street rooms” is a primary goal of the Southdale District block planning. To define a room, buildings need consistent walls and a measurable cornice to frame the experience of the street. Within the district it is the intention to define a series of street rooms each having their own characteristics and connections to existing neighborhoods and other parts of the district. This strategy will enhance the experience of the pedestrian, creating both a sense of place and a safe environment. Levels 1 through 4 dark blue illustrates where built square footage can be added to the footprint (to reallocate from square footage in non- conforming overall building height) The proposal includes a 75 foot wide woonerf on the north parcel. Creating a narrower, 60 foot wide street results in additional space (in yellow) that can be built out to better meet the street room experience. Setbacks and Step-Backs The proposed building setbacks and building step-backs are not meeting the definition of the draft Southdale District Experience Guidelines in terms of creating a definable building wall. Although the design team has taken care to create a series of façade designs by pushing and pulling the face of the building wall, the design along the West Promenade (woonerf) does not meet the intent of the creating a street room experience. Nor is the proposed building height in compliance with current thinking about heights within this important transition zone. The diagrams below illustrate a strategy for reallocating square footage from the existing 6th and 7th floors (which do not comply with current thinking about building heights within transition zones) to square footage along the woonerf to offset some of the issues with the proposal exceeding the 60 foot building height. Level 5 additional space is illustrated in dark blue and is set back 10 feet from the woonerf Level 6 blue shading indicates a proposed step back from main facades above 60’ in height. The proposed Level 7 ‘pop ups’ on the corners are not aligned with current thinking about building heights in this transition zone. 60 foot wide West Promenade (Woonerf) 60 foot height limit50 foot height limit 36 foot height limit step back 10 feet Although height above 60’ is not part of the Work Group’s current discussions, should the City wish to consider additional height, we recommended allowing only one floor above the 60 foot height limit, which must be stepped back 10 feet from all public facing facades France Avenue Parking Access One the important goals of the draft Southdale District Experience Guidelines is to limit vehicular traffic as much as possible where pedestrians and bicycles are moving through the district. The West Promenade is intended to be a pedestrian and bicycle collector between the existing residential neighborhood and new development. We recommend providing access to the development’s below grade parking at one location closest to a primary road within the Southdale District –Gallagher Drive –and eliminate the below-grade access in the north parcel. Should this proposal have a more direct access from Gallagher into below grade parking, proposed new resident vehicular traffic on the West Promenade and 70th Street would be limited, making Gallagher the preferred movement to and from below grade parking. Eliminate below grade access To City of Edina Cary Teague, Community Development Director From Mic Johnson, FAIA Date October 18,2018 Cary: We are pleased to submit this addendum to the report we provided to you yesterday regarding the proposed development at 7200-7250 France Avenue South. We reviewed the revised and new drawings provided to you by DJR Architecture on October 17. In general, we believe the comments we provided in our report dated October 17, 2018 are still valid and should be taken into consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council in their evaluation of the project. We do have some additional comments based upon the material palette as described on the building elevations submitted yesterday. This information was not part of the original packet provided to our team for review. We believe the proposed material usage is not in concert with the overall vision for achieving quality buildings that reflect the aspirations of the Edina community. Architecture Field Office Most building design is focused on efficient space utilization, continuity between interior functions, market fluctuations and project proforma, all of which are important to the quality of the building and overall project success. But in fact, the greater long-term role of any building is in its façade and how well it performs in making our city streets and public rooms successful in supporting a quality of life for all of its citizens. Every building’s exterior materials play a important role in defining the experience of the public realm. The quality of a building’s façade is critically important because its influence extends beyond the property line. The conscious design of the public realm and “street rooms” must take precedent to set the stage for high quality of daily life experiences. Through our continued conversations with the Greater Southdale Area Work Group, there is strong sense that the exterior materials of each building has a relationship to the history and the future of the whole district. Consideration for materials in the public realm fall into five categories that could apply to any building in the district: natural material such as brick, stone and tile are used within the 60 foot height limit materials such as wood, metal panel systems and stucco can be used within the 60 foot height limit when not facing the public realm material above the 60 foot limit material such as glass curtain wall, precast wall systems, metal panel wall systems are suggested. 75 transparency at the ground level for retail and commercial space No individual garage doors for residential units such as townhouses Architecture Field Office The colors on the plans below (first floor and typical floor) denote the important material attributes of the buildings and transparency of facades, corresponding with the key provided above. While the proposal does align with the guidance provided on the previous page in certain locations, it falls short in the first attribute (noted in red) that while some of the building’s public-realm facing facades do have a significant amount of glazing, the primary non-glazed material for the 60’ height is proposed as metal panel rather than a natural material such as brick or natural stone. We would encourage the design team to revisit the overall material usage to better align with the evolving districtwide goals for new building development. Thank you for the opportunity to review. Please let me know if you have questions. Mic. www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 DATE: October 23, 2018 TO: Owner and Development Team of 7200-7250 France Avenue CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Tara Brown – Sustainability Division RE: Sustainability Conditions for PUD re-zoning If an plot is to be re-zoned to PUD, the development must meet higher sustainability standards that support healthy living for the residents and environment. Current community goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 30% by 2025 and 80% by 2050. “Buildings in the US are responsible for 39% of CO2 emissions, 40% of energy consumption, 13% of water consumption and 15% of GDP per year.” It is critical that new development assist the community in reaching its sustainability goal. Below are the sustainability conditions that support the community’s sustainability goal. • Sustainable Design and Energy Design Assistance - In 2017, 40% of the electricity efficiency in Edina’s commercial sector came from Xcel Energy’s Energy Design Assistance (EDA). Buildings greater than 50,000 square feet will go through Xcel Energy’s EDA-Enhanced program during Schematic Design Phase. There is no fee for this program. The design of the building will need to apply for SB 2030 Alternative Path Method. The building will need to incorporate any recommendations through the Enhanced version that have a 15-year payback or less or an alternative that would get the same energy savings as the recommendations from the EDA program. • Renewable Energy – Multi-family buildings carry a significant footprint, which makes it ripe for some form of renewable energy. Whether it is making the roofs solar ready, utilizing green space for geo-thermal, or building thermal storage within the stormwater storage tanks, some kind of renewable energy use to lower the carbon footprint and reduce operating energy costs will need to be on-site. • Electric Vehicle (EV) Charging Infrastructure - Current EV penetration in the Edina market is 3% with anticipated penetration to grow to 10% in the coming decade. At least 2% of parking must have EV chargers. The type of chargers should reflect EV connection needs (i.e. Half or more than half must be compatible with the US/European connection, J-1772). EV charging capacity not only meets the sustainability needs, it is also becoming a differentiator and selling point for retailers, hoteliers, office, and residential rental properties. One of the top barriers to EV adoption is having the www.EdinaMN.gov • 952-927-8861 • Fax 952-826-0390 capacity to charge the car at a renter’s home. At minimum, an additional 10% of parking stalls be EV ready to install chargers as future tenants request access. • Energy Star appliances in Multi-Family homes – For non-commercial kitchen areas, purchase Energy Star appliances where Energy Star options are available for appliance category. For example, there are multiple Energy Star options for mini-fridges, fridges, washer and dryers, and dishwashers to install. • Energy Star appliances in Businesses – Energy Star appliances are not only needed for apartments, but for businesses on site. For example, a commercial kitchen uses three times the amount of energy per square foot than most other types of commercial buildings. Through the Xcel and Centerpoint Energy Design Assistance process and through negotiations with business tenants, it will be critical to identify the appliances that should be Energy Star rated and save the business 10% - 30% in energy expenses overtime. For commercial kitchens, at minimum, fridges and dishwashers will need to be Energy Star certified and ventilation hoods will need to be demand controlled. These provide the greatest operational savings and a fast ROI for owners. • Organics recycling –For renters, one of the top barriers to future organics recycling is space to collect and space at hauler pick up for additional bins. If the space is not designed in original plans, the cost to make room has been too high for many to take on this additional service in the future. All collection spots within the building and areas outside the building for trash collection must have space for three or more bins: recycling, organics recycling, and waste bins. This includes making space for the commercial kitchen to recycling organics as well. Page 2 DATE: October 18, 2018 TO: 7200_7250 France Ave, Owner and Development Team CC: Cary Teague – Community Development Director FROM: Chad Millner, PE – Director of Engineering Charlie Gerk, PE – Graduate Engineer RE: 7200_7250 France Ave – Development Review The Engineering Department has reviewed the subject property for pedestrian facilities, utility connections, grading, and storm water. Plans reviewed were; Civil, Landscape, and Survey drawings dated 07/27/2018. Review Comment Required For General 1. Deliver as-build records of public and private utility infrastructure post construction. Certificate of Occupancy 2. A Developer’s Agreement or Site Improvement Performance Agreement will be required for construction of public sidewalk and utilities. Certificate of Occupancy 3. Maintenance for sidewalks along 72nd street and others not directly adjacent to France Ave to be responsibility of property owner. General Comment 4. Vacate existing easements as needed with easement holders, including city of Edina. Grading/Building Permit 5. Provide public easements for relevant public utilities. Grading/Building Permit 6. Provide sidewalk easements along France Ave. If sidewalk is located on private property. Grading/Building Permit Survey 7. An existing and proposed site condition survey is required. Grading/Building Permit 7.1 Show all existing and proposed public and private easements. Grading/Building Permit Living Streets 8. Design sidewalks to meet ADA requirements. Grading/Building Permit 9. Saw cut concrete sidewalk joints on public sidewalks. Grading/Building Permit 10. Public sidewalk to be minimum 6’ in width along France Ave unless it is the only sidewalk facility provided. If only facility, public sidewalk to be minimum of 8’ in width along France Ave. Grading/Building Permit 11. Public sidewalk to be minimum 5’ in width along 72nd Street and Gallagher Dr. Grading/Building Permit 12. Reconstruct pedestrian ramps on NW and SW quads of 72nd and France Ave Grading/Building Permit 13. Gallagher Drive is a Municipal State Aid street. Any geometric changes are required to meet MSA standards and be approved by engineering staff. City does not recommend neck down or pedestrian crossing at west Gallagher driveway connection. Crosswalk does not meet city policy for crosswalk spacing. Access to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail can be made at the signalized intersection at France or by following the existing sidewalk to Gallagher and Parklawn. Grading/Building Permit Traffic and Street 14. Review fire access requirements with fire department. Fire truck turning template attached. Grading/Building Permit 15. Provide traffic study. Grading/Building Permit 16. Curb cut permit required for entrance reconstruction. Prior to Reconstructing Entrance 17. Road patching shall conform to Edina Standard Plates 540-545. Full width, saw cut to saw cut on Sunnyside Ave. Certificate of Occupancy 18. Proposed France Avenue lighting must remain consistent with Canto light fixtures. Grading/Building Permit Sanitary and Water Utilities 19. Verify fire demand and hydrant locations. Grading/Building Permit 20. Domestic water shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 21. Domestic sanitary shall be sized by the developer’s engineer. Grading/Building Permit 22. Apply for a sewer and water connection permit with public works. Prior to Starting Utility Work 22.1 Meter required for building service line and combined lines. No meter required for fire only service line. Grading/Building Permit 22.2 Public works to determine acceptable installation methods. Grading/Building Permit 23. Disconnected sanitary and water services to be capped at main. Utility Permit 24. A SAC determination will be required by the Metropolitan Grading/Building Permit Council. The SAC determination will be used by the city to calculate sewer and water connection charges 25. Single connection from main for fire and domestic, split after main connection unless required based on building heights, watermain pressure or watermain flows. Grading/Building Permit 26. City has a need for a north-south watermain pipe between 72nd Street and Gallagher Dr. Applicant to work with engineering to determine a route and provide utility easement. Grading/Building Permit 27. City has a need to upsize the sanitary sewer main along 72nd Street. Applicant to work with engineering to determine if work could be completed by the applicant but paid for by the city as utility work is occurring by the applicant. Grading/Building Permit Storm Water Utility 28. Provide geotechnical report with soil borings. Grading/Building Permit 29. Provide hydraulic and hydrologic report meeting watershed and state construction site permit requirements. Grading/Building Permit 30. Submit watershed district permit and copies of private maintenance agreement in favor of watershed. Grading/Building Permit 31. France Avenue low point currently flows into 7200 France property. Hydrologic model needs to address modified EOF path for this condition, and grading plan needs to prevent inflow into parking garage. Grading/Building Permit 32. Downstream stormwater system has limited capacity. Provide existing conditions lift station design. Rate will be limited to 0.5 cfs or existing conditions, whichever is less. Grading/Building Permit 33. The subject property provides conveyance of stormwater and flood storage for adjacent properties to the south through three private easements noted on the ALTA title survey. Provide hydrologic and hydraulic report detailing the proposed changes to rate, volume, flow, flood storage and peak flood elevations. a. Use NOAA Atlas 14 storm probabilities b. Provide storage for LE_20 flood waters Grading/Building Permit 34. Building low floor elevation must follow CWRMP policy 3.1.1.1, be a minimum of 2’ above the 100 year HWL of basin. Grading/Building Permit 35. Provide private maintenance agreement for lift station and associated stormwater infrastructure. Grading/Building Permit 36. Resolve conflict from underground parking from main area to townhome parking and stormwater tank. Grading/Building Permit Grading Erosion and Sediment Control 37. A SWPPP consistent with the state general construction site stormwater permit is required. Grading/Building Permit Constructability and Safety 38. Construction staging, traffic control, and pedestrian access plans will be required. Grading/Building Permit Other Agency Coordination 39. Hennepin County, MDH, MPCA and MCES permits required as needed. Grading/Building Permit 40. Nine Mile Creek Watershed Districts permit is required. Grading/Building Permit 41. Based on further consideration, Hennepin County is willing to allow a right-in / right-out access near the mid-point between 72nd Street and Gallagher Drive to accommodate the current 7200-7250 redevelopment project. The access design will be required to incorporate a dedicated right turn lane off France Avenue to minimize vehicular conflicts. In addition, the access design may need other geometric details to minimize conflicts with mainline traffic on France Avenue (wider corner radii, channelization, tapers, etc.). County approval of the design will be required prior to the issuance of any permits. It is suggested that early discussions with county staff and preliminary concept sketches be developed prior to a formal plan review process. The county retains its authority to require future modifications or closure should documented safety or serious traffic operational problems occur related to the access. Also, if for some reason this redevelopment proposal does not move ahead, the county will re-evaluate the access situation for any new development proposals. General Consideration EXPLORE LL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Statement of Support Approving Preliminary Rezoning And Comprehensive Plan Amendment 7200/7250 France Avenue The Chamber of Commerce and its Economic Development Committee (the "Chamber") has reviewed the request by DJR Architecture for the project located at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue, in which a non-binding sketch plan review request was presented to the City Council on August 21, 2018. Upon review, we believe that: (1) the project addresses city and resident concerns to develop a buffer consisting of townhomes and a through road between the new development and existing homes to the west; (2) the project meets the need to provide highly desired owner-occupied townhomes; (3) the addition of a through road will alleviate resident traffic concerns regarding possible overflow into the neighborhood; (4) the project addresses the city's concern to create a cohesive proposal for 7200 France and the adjacent 7250 site; (5) the project contains 20% apartments designated as affordable housing. (6) redevelopment of this area will reduce the available medical office space; but other developments such as Wildamere and Pentagon North have adequate vacancies to absorb these businesses to keep them in Edina; (7) the redevelopment of the site addresses the structural deficiencies and safety concerns of the current structure. Therefore, we encourage the Council to approve the re zoning and comprehensive plan amendment request subject to the conditions identified in the proposed Resolution dated November _,2018. Dated this Ce day of (?^^A^L-<e-l^-', 2018. EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE BY: Joel Hilge Its: mmi ee Chair DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. City of Edina Site Plan - 09.24.2018 FRANCE AVE. MIXED USE 7200 & 7250 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 2 Table of Contents Contents Introduction Table of Contents A Key Mixed-Use on France Vicinity Map Current Site Conditions Site Analysis - Zoning Site Analysis - Land Use Bike Paths Nine-Mile Creek Regional Trail Sketch Vision Southdale Height Study Panorama Topography Size Comparison Survey Existing Conditions Proposed Development Masterplan Stacking Diagram Site Data Site Plan Circulation Diagrams Site Nodes and Water Retention Diagrams Model Views Sun Studies Aerial View Looking South Architect333 Washington Avenue N, Suite 210Minneapolis, MN 55401 Design Team Owner/Developers 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 18 21 24 25 26 27 28-29 30-31 32-37 38 Landscape Architect530 N 3rd St., Suite 120Minneapolis, MN 55401 Civil Engineer4931 West 35th St, Suite 200, St Louis Park, MN 55416 Site 7200 & 7250 France Avenue S.FRANCE AVENUEFrance Equities LLC CPEC EXCH 39560/61 DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use3 • Low density • Separated building uses • Car-dependent • Inefficient • Exclusive and isolating From To • Sensible higher density • Mixed-use, “total lifestyle” • Highly mobile; walking, biking, driving (and being driven) • Inclusive and connecting • Sustainable and connected to nature • A next step for existing residents to move to... • ... and new residents to join the Edina community France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 4 Vicinity Map Vicinity Map Gallagher Drive Looking West W 72nd Street Looking West France Avenue Looking South France Avenue Looking North Site 9-mi Creek Regional Trail Edina Promenade/Bike path France Ave S Hwy. 100 & 62; I-494 Key N Site Description The project site is composed two parcels along France Avenue South: Site A is the 7200 France Ave South on the west side of France Avenue S which is 152,751 sf/3.51 ac and is currently occupied by a blighted office building with surface parking and a natural tree grove to the west. Site B is the 7250 France Ave South on the west side of France Avenue S which is 73,079 sf/1.68 ac and is currently occupied by a blighted office building and two level parking structure. The project comprises the ‘missing link’ in an extensive network of pedestrian walkways and vehicular access points, as well as a center point in Edina’s primary com- mercial corridor between Highway 62 (Crosstown) on the north and Interstate 494 to the south. DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use5 Current Site Conditions 2. Existing Building at 72001. France Avenue Looking South 4. Existing Parking Structure at 7250 5. Existing Building at 7250 6. France Avenue Looking North 3. Existing Surface Parking N 1 2 3 4 5 6 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 6 R-1 R-2 PRD-4 PCD-3 POD-1 PUD PSR-4 MDD-6 Key - Zoning Site Analysis- Zoning Zoning per City of Edina N Sec. 36-578 (POD District) (1) Maximum building coverage: 30 percent of the tract. (2) Maximum floor area ratio: 0.5 percent of the tract. (3) Setbacks shall be measured from the boundary of the tract: Front Street: 35 feet* Side Street: 35 feet* Interior Side Yard: 20 feet* Rear Yard: 20 feet* (4) Maximum Building Height POD-1: HOD-4, 4 stories or 48’, whichever is less Sec. 36-579 Special Requirements In addition to the general requirements described in article XII, division 2 of this chapter, the following special requirements shall apply: (1) Increased setbacks. The front street or side street setback shall be increased to not less than 50 feet when the principal use is located across the street from an R-1 district used for resi- dential purposes. When the Planned Office District is an integral part of either a Planned Industrial District or a Planned Commer- cial District, the front street setback and the side street setback shall be not less than those prescribed for the major district. (2) Proximity to R-1 district. The following minimum distance shall be provided between the closest point of the office building closest to an R-1 district and the nearest lot line of an R-1 district used for residential purposes: 5-6 stories - Twice the building height of the office building 7-8 stories - Four times the building height of the office building 9 or more stories - Six time the building height of the office build- ing (3) Building design and construction. In addition to other restric- tions of this section and article III of chapter 10, the use, con- struction, alteration or enlargement of any building or structure within the Planned Office District shall meet the following standards: a. All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a com- bination of the following: 1. Face brick; 2. Natural stone; Relevant Codes per City of Edina Sec. 36-579 (cont.) 3. Specially designed precast concrete units, if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied decorative material or texture; 4. Factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction, if the panel materials are any of those noted in subsections (3)a.1 through 3 of this section; or 5. Glass or pre finished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron). b. All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general ap- pearance. DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use7 Site Analysis- Land Use Single-Family Duplex Multi-Family Mixed-Use Retail Office Senior Living Key - Usage Land Use N France Avenue Southdale Area Working Principles Allow latitude to gain tangible and intangible outcomes aligned with the district principles. Advance quality through thoughtful and artful design of buildings and publicly accessible spaces, highlighted human activity, and enhanced economic vibrancy. Look beyond baseline utilitarian functions of a single site to create mutually supportive and forward-looking infrastructure sustaining the district. Foster a logical, safe, inviting and expansive public realm facili- tating movement of people within and to the district. Encourage parcel-appropriate intensities promoting harmonious and interactive relationships without “leftover” spaces on sites. Advance human and environmental health as the public and private realms evolves. Embrace purposeful innovation aimed at identified and antici- pated problems. Promote well-balanced aggregations of “come to” and “stay at” places focused on human activity and linked to an engaging public realm. Ensure every component contributes to the sustained economic vitality of the district and the community. Give-to-Get; Plan & Process Edina Cultural Preferences; Identity District Function Comprehensive Connections; Movement Site Design; Transitions Health Innovation Land Use; Live-able Precincts Economic Vitality France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 8 Bike Paths The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail meanders past its namesake Creek, and through the wetlands and woodlands of the Edina area including the newly master planned Fred Richards Park. When complete, the trail will travel from Hopkins through Edina and Richfield, connecting to the Nokomis-Minnesota River Regional Trail in Richfield and the Minnesota River Bluffs LRT Regional Trail in Hopkins. The Trail will extend 15.3 miles when complete. The sizes occupy a key crossroads for this regional infrastructure and provide an opportunity to create a signature landmark for the Edina com- munity. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail F R A N C E A V E N U E S O U T H WEST 76TH S T R E E T PARKLAW N A V E N U E Nine Mile Creek Bike Trail in Southdale Area DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use9 Nine-Mile Creek Regional Trail Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Bike Route Bus Line Bus Station Key Trail at intersection of France and Gallagher Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail, Edina East Sec. - Three Rivers Park District Current Investment - Bridge spanning Hwy. 100 north of Interstate 494 (finished) N France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 10 Sketch Vision Sketch Vision from Southdale Study (2016) *from dated March 18th, 2016 Proposed Site Edina Southdale Re-visioning Plan: • Build upon existing assets • Improve access • Walkable • Human-scaled • Architecturally varied • Mixed-use • Family friendly • Green • Summer city • Winter city • Connected • A destination DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use11 Southdale Height Study >200 ft 100-200 ft <100 ft Key N Southdale Height Study Site 1. The Edina Towers:154 ft.2. Point of France: 130 ft 4. The Westin Edina Galleria: 215 ft3. One Southdale Place: 115 ft 5. The Durham: 118 ft 7. Brookdale Edina: 190 ft 8. Yorktown Continental: 105 ft6. Minnesota Center: 207 ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 12 SITE 1 2 1 2 Gallagher Dr France Ave SW 72nd St Panorama- 7200&7250 France Ave 1. West View from France Ave 2. East View from France Ave Across From Project Site Project Site N Key Plan DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use13 Panorama- 7200&7250 France Ave 3. North View from Gallagher Dr 4. South View from Gallagher Dr Project Site Across From Project Site Key Plan SITE 1 2 1 2 Gallagher Dr France Ave SW 72nd St N France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 14 Topography 7200 & 7250 France Avenue S The site is located to the west of South France Ave and in between the West 72nd St and the Gallagher Dr. There is a 24-foot elevation difference from the high point of the site to the low point of the site which provides suitable conditions for underground parking. Topography @ 2’ contours from Hennepin County GIS Existing Topography N High Point +860.00 ft Low Point +836.00 ft DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use15 Size Comparison 7200/7250 France Avenue Total Area: 225,831 sf/ 5.18 ac One Southdale Place Total Area: 222,919 sf/ 5.12 ac N N SITE One Southdale France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 16 Survey - 7200 France Avenue South Survey-2008 DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use17 Survey - 7250 France Avenue South 4 Story Glass and Concrete Building 7250 France Ave S, Edina, MN 55435Concrete Foundation Area: 13,947 Sq. Ft. N89°51'35"W 300.00 S00°11'54"E 268.99N75°01'42"E 5 6 . 4 1 121.79 Δ=14°46'24" R=472.36 N89°48'06"E 125.00 N00°11'54"W 237.2293.15 148.095.75 1.6686.94 150.67Gallagher Drive France Ave(A Public R/W)(A Public R/W)2 Story Parking Ramp Below Access to 2 Story Parking Ramp BelowDESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Parcel 1: Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property Parcel 2: Together with the benefit of Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated November 12, 1971, filed February 8, 1972, as DocumentNo. 1022380. Parcel 3: Together with the benefit of Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated November 10, 1971, filed February 8, 1972, as DocumentNo. 1022381. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Notes (numbered per Table A) 1.Bearings are based on the Hennepin County Coordinate System. 2.Site Address: 7250 France Ave S, Edina, MN 55435. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood InsuranceRate Map, Community Panel No. 27059C0452F, effective date of 11-04-16. 4.The Gross land area is 73,298+/- square feet or 1.683 +/- acres. 5. Elevations are based on the top nut of the hydrant located at the southwest corner of the property, as shown hereon, having anelevation of 862.76 feet (NGVD 1929). 6. The current Zoning for the subject property was not provided by the insurer. Please note that the general restrictions for thesubject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in arecorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for thecurrent restrictions for this site. 11. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from thefollowing sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and otherappropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However,lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Whereadditional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please notethat seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. SURVEY REPORT 1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Loan Policy for Title Insurance issued by Old Republic National TitleInsurance Company, File No. 552885, dated June 1, 2017. We note the following with regards to Schedule B of the herein referencedTitle Commitment: a. Item no.'s 1-3 are not survey related. b. The following are numbered per the referenced title Commitment: 3.Drainage and utility easements(s) as shown on the recorded Plat of Oscar Roberts First Addition. As shown hereon. 4. The following appears as a Memorial on the Certificate of Title: Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated November 12, 1971, filed February 8, 1972, as DocumentNo. 1022380. This easement is located over the northerly adjoining property as shown hereon. 5. The following appears as a Memorial on the Certificate of Title:Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated November 10, 1971, filed February 8, 1972, as DocumentNo. 1022381. This Easement is located over the northeast portion of the westerly adjoining property as shownhereon. 6.Easement for flowage and drainage of surface waters dated January 28, 1972, filed February 8, 1972, as DocumentNo. 1022382. This easement is located over the north 5 feet of the subject property as shown hereon. 7.Easement for public road purposes, in favor of the Village of Edina dated May 20, 1972, filed May 31, 1972, asDocument No. 1032483. This easement is located in the southeast corner of the subject property, as shown hereon. 8.Easement for highway signal, in favor of County of Hennepin filed July 15, 1983, as Document No. 1524065. Thiseasement is shown along the southerly line of the subject property, as shown hereon.9.Easement for highway signal, in favor of County of Hennepin filed July 15, 1983, as Document No. 1524066. Thiseasement is shown along the southerly line of the subject property, as shown hereon. 10.Easement for highway signal, in favor of County of Hennepin filed July 15, 1983, as Document No. 1524067.Thiseasement is shown along the southerly line of the subject property, as shown hereon. 11.Easement for highway signal, in favor of County of Hennepin filed July 15, 1983, as Document No. 1524068. Thiseasement is shown along the southerly line of the subject property, as shown hereon. 2. Conflicts such as (but not limited to): encroachments, protrusions, access, occupation, and easements and/or servitudes:a.There is a sidewalk that located partially on the subject property in the southwest corner of the site as shown hereon. b.there is a driveway that encroached the northeasterly portion of the site, as shown hereon.c. There is a bituminous driveway that is accessing the northerly and adjoining property without an easement, as shown hereon. ALTA CERTIFICATION To: France Equities, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company; Commerce Bank, a Minnesota chartered bank, its successors and/orassigns as their respective interests may appear; and Old Republic National Title Company: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum StandardDetail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, and 11 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on February 9th, 2018. Dated this 14th day of February, 2018. ________________________________________________________ Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com OVERHEAD UTILITIES FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER TELEPHONE LINE CABLE LINE WATERMAIN ELECTRIC LINE GASMAIN CHAINLINK FENCELINE GUARDRAIL SIGN SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CABLE TV BOX TELEPHONE MANHOLE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER TELEPHONE BOX TRAFFIC SIGNAL GAS METER ELECTRICAL METERWOODEN FENCELINE WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE BARBED WIRE FENCE AIR CONDITIONER BOLLARD SOIL BORING CLEAN OUT CATCH BASIN ELECTRIC BOX HANDHOLE ELECTRIC MANHOLE GAS VALVE FLAG POLE HANDICAP SYMBOL FOUND IRON MONUMENT HYDRANT CAST IRON MONUMENT SET IRON MONUMENT FLARED END SECTION Linetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEBLOCK RET WALL UTILITY MANHOLE VICINITY MAP7250 France Ave7250 France Ave, Edina, MN 55435333 washington avenue north, suite 210 union plaza, minneapolis, mn 55401DJR Architecture, Inc.PROJECT4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944 952-250-2003 PROJECT NO.: 18033 COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c 44565 RORY L. SYNSTELIEN LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 2-14-18 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION V1.0 ALTA/NSPS LANDTITLE SURVEY 3-19-18 ADDED TREES. .. .. .. .. . 40102001040 SCALE IN FEET N N Survey-2007 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 18 Existing Conditions - 7200 France Avenue The western property line on the proposed site is bordered by an existing tree grove on the 7200 parcel and a retaining wall and existing parking structure on the 7250 parcel. West Property Line DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use19 Existing Conditions - 7250 France Avenue The western property line on the proposed site is bordered by an existing tree grove on the 7200 parcel and a retaining wall and existing parking structure on the 7250 parcel. West Property Line France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 20 Existing Conditions - The Cedars West Property Line The western property line on the proposed site is bordered by a n apartment complex known as The Cedars of Edina . DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use21 The Proposed Project 7200 & 7250 France Avenue S 09.24.2018 285-310 Apartments+ 10 Town-Homes + 30,000 sf Commercial France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 22 Overall Perspective 1 Rendering viewing South entrance from Gallagher to the West Promenade DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use23 Overall Perspective 2 Rendering viewing South entrance from 72nd to the West Promenade France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 24 Overall Masterplan Overall Masterplan N France Avenue Mixed-Use The concept of Mixed-Use Living is to place increased density at appropriate locations within the Southdale Area and provide the vital links between the neighborhoods that allow the density to fit within the urban fabric correctly. Incorporating the Woonerfs concept to the West Promenade al- lows a perfect hybrid of live, work and relaxed in a well-balanced neighborhood. DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use25 Stacking Diagram 86' - 6"RESIDENT IAL RETAIL 76' - 6"RESIDENTIALRETAILRESIDENTIALRETAIL88' - 6"20' - 0"Overall Summary Stacking Diagram Retail Residential Key Proposed (GSF)Floors Residential 337,710 6 For Sale Town-homes 25,000 2 Retail 28,256 1 Parking 230,910 3 Total 621,876 France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 26 Summary - Site Data PID: 3102824140001 Address: 7200 France Avenue S. Area: 152,751 SF (3.51 acres) Zoning: POD-1 FAR: 0.5 Height Overlay: HOD-4, 4 stories or 48’, whichever is less. Legal Designation: The N 325 Ft Of The E 520 Ft Of Se 1/4 Of Ne 1/4 Ex Road Proposed: Area/FAR: 201,997 SF (1.29 FAR) Height: 86’-6” to top of deck Density: 145-165 units (40-50 units per acre) PID: 3102824140015 Address: 7250 France Avenue S. Area: 73,080 SF (1.68 acres) Zoning: POD-1 FAR: 0.5 Height Overlay: HOD-4, 4 stories or 48’, whichever is less. Legal Designation: Oscar Roberts First Addition Lot 004 Block 001 EX Street Proposed: Area/FAR: 170,848 SF (2.32 FAR) Height: 86’-6” to top of deck Density: 125-145 units (75-86 units per acre) Site A Data Site B Data Street View from France Ave Overall Proposed: Area/FAR: 372,845 SF (1.65 FAR) Height: 86’-6” to top of deck Density: 265 - 335 units (51-64 units per acre) Site A Area Table (7200 France)Site B Area Table (7250 France) 7250 Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces 7200 Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces L1 38,140 L1 45,709 Parking (TH) 11,286 14 Parking (TH)16,988 16 Rental Town-homes 7,317 8 Rental Town-homes 11,523 14 Retail A 4,877 Retail C 5,765 Retail B 11,433 Retail D 6,181 L2 Apartments 28,801 20 L2 Apartments 37,105 32 L3 Apartments 28,801 28 L3 Apartments 31,257 34 L4 Apartments 28,801 28 L4 Apartments 31,257 34 L5 Apartments 26,340 27 L5 Apartments 31,257 34 L6 Apartments 18,565 19 L6 Apartments 19,962 21 L7 Apartments 3,000 L7 Apartments 5,450 TOTAL 170,848 122 8 TOTAL 201,997 155 14 PARK Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces T.H.Floor Use GSF Apts TH Units Park Spaces P2 Parking 115,455 270 4 Sale L1 Townhomes 12,500 10 20 P1 Parking 115,455 270 L2 Townhomes 12,500 TOTAL 230,910 540 TOTAL 25,000 20 DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use27 Masterplan Site Description Masterplan N 80’ 40’ 50’ 55’ 25’ N The site is composed of two parcels, 7200 and 7250 France Avenue. The 7200 parcel (Site A) is proposed to be a mixed- use building, 6 floor with few aprtments that have a mezanine level, and steps down to a 2 story town-homes to the West. The building will house 138 units, 14 rental town home units, 10 for sale Town-houses and approximately 13,000 SF of Retail along France Avenue. The 7250 parcel (Site B) is proposed to be a 6 story mixed-use building which will house 117 residential units, 8 rental town- home units and approximately 16,300 SF of retail along France Avenue Both buildings will also have 2 levels of underground parking which will be accessible from either the road connecting from France Avenue to the West Promenade and from the West Promenade. The two buildings will also have access to on grade parking for the town home units. France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 28 Vehicular Circulation Diagram Site - Vehicular Circulation Vehicular Circulation Parking Entr ances Transit Stops Controlled Intersections Vehicular Circulation N The concept of the vehicular circulation was to provide very ac- cessible internal circulation off of France Avenue and Gallagher Drive which can be easily managed with the phasing of the proj- ect. There are drop-off locations on the West Promenade and the street connecting from France Ave to the West Promenade (retail/residential). There are multiple transit stops adjacent to the project which are located at the intersection of France and Gallagher and the intersection of France and 72nd. DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use29 Pedestrian/Bike Circulation Diagram Site - Pedestrian & Bike Circulation Bike Circulation Pedestrian Circulation Pedestrian/Bike Circulation N The concept of the pedestrian and bike circulation on site was based on the Woonerf concept. Pedestrian circulation starts on France Avenue and spills onto the parallel Woonerf (the West Promenade) through 72nd, Gallagher and a mid-block connect- ing France Avenue to the West Promenade. The Woonerf is a pedestrian oriented street with plenty of social activities and places for rest and socializing. The Townhomes on the East and for sale Town-Houses on the west of the Woonerf are both fac- ing the pedestrian oriented street and a vehicular street allows access from the south of the two sites on Gallagher to 72nd on the north. This access holds one of the two underground parking accesspoints. France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 30 Anticipated Nodes Diagram Site - Nodes Vehicular Circulation Anticipated Nodes Linear Node N Along the pedestrian main path, both on France Avenue and the Woonerf, there are few places that are anticipated to be a place of converging traffics and therefore become nodes. Few nodes will develop along France Ave. retail face and a landscape point of interest would be developed, as well as the Woonerf’s public plaza and stair entry to 72nd plaza. DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use31 Water Retention Diagram Water Flow and Retention Water Flow Direction Water Retention Pedestrian/Bike Circulation N The 7200 site has a major elevation drop which acts as a natu- ral water retention place. water from all the sur-roundings sites flow onto the center of the site as shown on the diagram. a water retention system is designed below the woonerf and to- gether with on grade water retention solutions such as bioswale designed planters and paving will hold the sufficient amount of water according to a hundred-year flood planning. France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 32 72nd and France Avenue Perspective DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use33 Gallagher and France Avenue Perspective France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 34 Gallagher and France Avenue Street View DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use35 7200 Public Plazza France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 36 7200 Public Plazza DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use37 72nd and France Avenue Perspective France Avenue Mixed-UseDJRARCHITECTURE INC. 38 Shadow Studies 9 am 12 pm 3 pm Spring Equinox March 20 Summer Solstice June 21 Winter Solstice December 22 7200 & 7250 FRANCE AVE7200-7250 FRANCE AVE. NORTH, EDINA, MINNESOTACITY SUBMITTALPROJECT TEAMOWNEROWNERARCHITECTDJR Architecture, Inc.333 Washington Avenue NUnion Plaza, Suite 210Minneapolis, MN 55401Contact: Sheldon Berg, AIA LEED AP612.676.2700612.676.2796 (fax)sberg@djr-inc.comLANDSCAPECIVILFrance Equities, LLC10296 182nd St. WestLakeville, MN 55044Civil Site Group4931 W. 35th Street,Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416Contact: David Knaeble, PE.763.234.7523Dknaeble@civilsitegroup.comConfluence530 North Third Street,Suite 120Minneapolis, MN 55401Contact: Brad Aldrich, PLA LEED AP BD+C, ASLA612.333.3702 X503BAldrich@thinkconfluence.comPARKINGLEVEL P2LEVEL P1TOWNHOMES (LEVEL P1)7200 (LEVEL 1)7250 (LEVEL 1)SPACES270270201614590TOTALARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONG000COVER SHEETEDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018RW7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018DesignerSHEET INDEXPRE 1.00 LEVELS P1 & P2PRE 1.01 LEVEL 1PRE 1.02 LEVEL 2PRE 1.03 LEVEL 3PRE 1.04 LEVEL 4PRE 1.05 LEVEL 5PRE 1.06 LEVEL 6PRE 1.07 LEVEL 7PRE 2.00 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - 7200PRE 2.01 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - 7250PRE A200 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS - TOWNHOMES ELEVATOR LOBBYELEV.RESIDENTIAL ELEVATOR ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CTRASH /RECYCLING MECH.STAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CMECH.MECH.UPUP30' - 9"20' - 0"75' - 2 1/2"220' - 10"27' - 4 1/2"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0 1/2"258' - 7 1/2"476' - 8"RESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEV.24' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 5"24' - 5"25' - 0"TOWNHOME GARAGESTOWNHOME GARAGES19' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"26' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"STORAGEMECH.STAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CMECH.MECH.UPRESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEV.19' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"18' - 0"26' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"18' - 0"24' - 0 1/2"18' - 0"STORAGEELEVATOR LOBBYELEV.RESIDENTIAL ELEVATOR ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR BSTAIR CTRASH /RECYCLING MECH.UPMECH.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.00LEVELS P1 & P2EDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018Designer 3/64" = 1'-0"B1LEVEL P1 3/64" = 1'-0"A1LEVEL P2 UPELEVATOR LOBBYRETAILELEVATORRESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CRESIDENTIAL TRASHCOMMERCIAL TRASHRESIDENCE LOBBYRETAILRETAILPARKING14 SPACESTOWNHOMES FOR RENTDOWNSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR C34' - 10"52' - 4 1/2"75' - 8"207' - 10"39' - 0 1/2"141' - 4"24' - 0"71' - 0"55' - 2"50' - 10"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0 1/2"24' - 8 1/2"259' - 6 1/2"185' - 1"115' - 2"25' - 6"69' - 10"208' - 3 1/2"35' - 5"475' - 10"20' - 11 1/2"RESIDENTIAL TRASHCOMMERCIAL TRASHRESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS RESIDENCE LOBBYTOWNHOMES FOR RENTTOWNHOMES FOR RENTRETAILRETAILRETAIL ELEVATORTOWNHOMES FOR SALETOWNHOMES FOR SALEPARKING16 SPACESBIKE PARK AND RIDEARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.01LEVEL 1EDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018Designer DNDNTRASH/REC.ELEC.STORAGEAMMENITY SPACERESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSOUTDOOR COURTYARDAPARTMENTSAMMENITY SPACEOUTDOOR COURTYARDAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR C52' - 4 1/2"75' - 8"207' - 10"236' - 4"55' - 2"50' - 10"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0"25' - 0 1/2"24' - 8 1/2"259' - 6 1/2"185' - 1"211' - 3"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGEELEV.ELEV.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.02LEVEL 2EDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018Designer TRASH/REC.ELEC.STORAGERESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR CAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSOUTDOOR PATIO.APARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR ASTAIR BSTAIR C197' - 8 1/2"236' - 10"54' - 6"185' - 9"210' - 6"208' - 3"475' - 10"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGEELEV.ELEV.TERRACESTERRACESARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.03LEVEL 3EDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018Designer TRASH/REC.ELEC.STORAGERESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR BSTAIR C197' - 8 1/2"65' - 5"103' - 3"68' - 2"54' - 6"185' - 9"198' - 6 1/2"65' - 7 1/2"64' - 9 1/2"65' - 6 1/2"475' - 10"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGEELEV.ELEV.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.04LEVEL 4EDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018Designer TRASH/REC.ELEC.STORAGERESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSOUTDOOR PATIO.APARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR BSTAIR C197' - 8 1/2"65' - 5"103' - 3"68' - 2"54' - 6"185' - 9"9' - 5 1/2"189' - 6"65' - 7 1/2"64' - 9 1/2"65' - 6 1/2"475' - 10"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGESTAIR AELEV.ELEV.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.05LEVEL 5EDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018Designer TRASH/REC.ELEC.RESIDENTIAL ELEVATORS ELEVATOR LOBBYSTAIR ASTAIR BAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSOUTDOOR PATIO.APARTMENTSAPARTMENTSAPARTMENTSSTAIR BSTAIR C197' - 8 1/2"65' - 5"103' - 3"68' - 2"63' - 1"56' - 11 1/2"120' - 2 1/2"11' - 1"178' - 5 1/2"65' - 7 1/2"64' - 9 1/2"65' - 6 1/2"475' - 10"TRASH/REC.ELEC. /DATA /STORAGEELEV.ELEV.ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.06LEVEL 6EDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018Designer APARTMENTS58' - 6 1/2"475' - 10"83' - 6 1/2"72' - 7 1/2"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 1.07LEVEL 7EDINA, MINNESOTA17-1249/24/2018AuthorChecker7200 & 7250 France Ave.Approver9/24/2018Designer LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4136' - 11 3/4"ROOF TRUSS BEARING177' - 11 1/4"LEVEL 5147' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6157' - 11 1/2"LEVEL 7168' - 5 3/8"STUCCOMETAL SHINGLESTUCCOFIBERGLASS WINDOWSMETAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOSTUCCOMETAL PANELMETAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL PANELBRICKMETAL SHINGLEALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELALUMINUM RAILINGSTUCCOARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELMETAL PANELARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTUCCOMETAL PANELFIBERGLASS WINDOWSFIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM STOREFRONTFIBERGLASS WINDOWSFIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM RAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTLEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3126' - 5 7/8"LEVEL 4136' - 11 3/4"ROOF TRUSS BEARING177' - 11 1/4"LEVEL 5147' - 5 5/8"LEVEL 6157' - 11 1/2"LEVEL 7168' - 5 3/8"ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL SHINGLEBRICKFIBERGLASS WINDOWMETAL PANELALUMINUM RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTUCCOMETAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM RAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL PANELSTUCCOMETAL SHINGLEBRICKALUMINUM STOREFRONTARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTFIBERGLASS WINDOWALUMINUM RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELMETAL SHINGLESBRICKALUMINUM RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWALUMINUM STORFRONTSTUCCOMETAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL SHINGLEBRICKFIBERGLASS WINDOWALUMINUM RAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOALUMINUM RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWMETAL PANELARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 2.00EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCITY, STATE17-1249/24/2018RW7200 FRANCEApprover9/24/2018Designer 1/16" = 1'-0"B1EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A1NORTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B2WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A2SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A4INTERNAL SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B4INTERNAL EAST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"B3INTERNAL WEST ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"A3INTERNAL NORTH ELEVATION LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL P189' - 4"LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2"LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8"STUCCOFIBERGLASSWINDOWSMETAL PANELARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELSTUCCOMETAL PANELALUMINUM RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWSOPEN TO GARAGEALUMINUM STOREFRONTALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL SHINGLEBRICK26' - 7 7/8"21' - 3 3/4"13' - 7 7/8"10' - 7 7/8"72' - 3 3/8"75' - 3 3/8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL P189' - 4"LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2"LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8"LEVEL P278' - 4"FIBERGLASS WINDOWSSTUCCOARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDINGGLASS RAILINGSMETAL PANELFIBERGLASS WINDOWSSTUCCO (BEYOND)STUCCOALUMINUM RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWSARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDINGGLASS RAILINGMETAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTFIBERGLASS WINDOWSGLASS RAILINGMETAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOMETAL SHINGLEBRICK10' - 7 7/8"34' - 11 5/8"26' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL P189' - 4"LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2"LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8"LEVEL P278' - 4"STUCCOFIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM BALCONY RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWSGLASS RAILINGALUMINUM STOREFRONTSTUCCOMETAL PANELMETAL PANEL ENTRYALUMINUM STOREFRONTMETAL PANELSTUCCOGLASS RAILING ON ALUMINUM BALCONYARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELMETAL PANELMETAL PANELALUMINUM STOREFRONTFIBERGLASS WINDOWSMETAL PANEL ENTRY12' - 0"72' - 3 3/8"LEVEL 1100' - 0"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL P189' - 4"LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2"LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8"LEVEL P278' - 4"FIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM BALCONY RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL SIDINGGLASS RAILINGMETAL SHINGLEBRICKMETAL PANELSTUCCOGLASS RAILING ON ALUMINUM BALCONYARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWSFIBERGLASS INDOWSMETAL SHINGLEBRICK34' - 11 5/8"26' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2"LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8"STUCCOFIBERGLASS WINDOWSALUMINUM RAILINGSARCHITECTURALMETAL PANELFIBERGLASS WINDOWSMETAL WRAPPED COLUMNSFIBERGLASS WINDOWSOPEN TO BEYONDSTUCCO12' - 0"56' - 3 3/8"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2"LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8"STUCCOALUMINUM BALCONY AND RAILINGFIBERGLASS WINDOWSSTUCCO56' - 3 3/8"LEVEL 2116' - 0"LEVEL 3/LEVEL4126' - 7 7/8"LEVEL 4 (SIM 3)137' - 3 3/4"LEVEL 5147' - 11 5/8"LEVEL 6158' - 7 1/2"LEVEL 7169' - 3 3/8"ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILINGARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELFIBERGLASS INDOWS45' - 7 1/2"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE54321PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRE 2.01EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSEDINA, MN17-1248.3.18AuthorChecker7250 FRANCE MIXED USEApprover8.3.18Designer 1/16" = 1'-0"1NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"2SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"7EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"8WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0"3EAST COURTYARD 1/16" = 1'-0"4NORTH COURTYARD 1/16" = 1'-0"5WEST COURTYARD STUCCO METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS INDOWS ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO METAL PANEL ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING 23' - 3 3/4"9' - 7 7/8"32' - 11 5/8"METAL PANEL STUCCO ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS INDOWS BRICK ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO STUCCOSTUCCOSTUCCO STUCCO METAL PANEL METAL PANEL BRICK ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS INDOWS ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL BRICK ALUMINUM BALCONY RAILING 10' - 7 7/8"12' - 7 7/8"9' - 7 7/8"32' - 11 5/8"STUCCO FIBERGLASS INDOWS ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL BRICK9' - 7 7/8"23' - 3 3/4"32' - 11 5/8"METAL PANEL STUCCO ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS INDOWS BRICK ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL STUCCO STUCCO STUCCOSTUCCO STUCCO METAL PANEL METAL PANEL BRICK ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANEL FIBERGLASS INDOWS 10' - 7 7/8"12' - 7 7/8"9' - 7 7/8"32' - 11 5/8"ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2018 DJR Architecture, IncA 6 333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCLIENTIssue:Date:Project #:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:CONTRACTORSTRUCTURALCIVILBCDE 5 4 3 2 1 PRINT NAMESIGNATUREREGISTRATION NUMBERDATEI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARY -NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONA200EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSCITY, STATE18-000Issue DateAuthorCheckerPROJECT NAMEApproverIssue DateDesigner 1/8" = 1'-0"F7 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"F5 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"F3 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-0"F1 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION UPUPDNDNBACIBCIJCABCIBCICB6UAACBAA9GD3PT3GB5AF13PT2GB350ss6MS200ba13AS57Vd60nf15Vd470bm6AB130sm5BP153dc2GD272dc490bm12GD8UA12AF3AA286dc6Dl20CC158ad2AA187dc40Ch141Ra9ad10Ch1AB6LL580bm91ba2QB36Ra2QB7CC4AF1GD24Vd1AB10sm10Ty1AB20sm8ca10TY1GD1AB6Vd6Ty10sm1AB69ss1AF20ca26sm6Vd71ca7Ch15Vd48sm1AF10PT297bm2GD1AB140BA145baBAH156shDD72ND ST. PROPOSED WOONERF24' TYPICAL WIDTHPROPOSED WOONERF22' TYPICAL WIDTHFRANCE AVE.GALLAGHER DR.LYNMAR LANEHH JJJLANDSCAPE SITE PLAN KEYNOTE LEGEND:SITE BENCHMOVEABLE TABLES AND CHAIRSCIP PLANTER/ SEAT WALLPEDESTRIAN LIGHTINGBOLLARDPLANTER/ POTSPLANT BED AT GRADEENTRY MONUMENT/ SIGNAGEACCESSIBLE RAMPSTAIRSACDFGHJBICCDECORATIVE PAVING ALANDSCAPE AREABIORETENTION AREASODNATIVE SEEDINNGFile Location: C:\Users\baldrich\Desktop\BRIEF\18071 - 7250 France\AUTOCAD\SHEETS\LS100 LANDSCAPE SITE / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX 30'60'15'7.5'0'1"=30'SCALE:01LANDSCAPE SITE AND PLANTING OVERVIEWDJR ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2008 DJR Architecture, Inc A6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com CLIENT Issue:Date:Project #: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: CONTRACTOR STRUCTURAL CIVIL BCDE54321PRINT NAME SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE I hereby certify that this plan,specification, or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUC T I O N PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EDINA, MINNESOTA 17-124 09.24.2018 EN BA 7200-7250 FRANCE MIXED USE Approver 03.26.2018Designer 530 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PH: 612-333-3702 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CONFLUENCELS100LANDSCAPE SITE AND PLANTING OVERVIEWLANDSCAPE VISUAL INTENT02LS100N.T.S 30"RADIUS MIN.4'-0"AEACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCHTHAT THE ROOT FLARE IS VISIBLE AT THETOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOTFLARE IS NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BEREMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THEROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAINORDER ROOT (12" DIA. OR LARGER)EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK. SET MAINORDER ROOT 1" HIGHER THAN ADJACENTGRADE. DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOTBALL WITH SOIL.SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT WITH SPADEBY HAND TO BIND WITH PREPARED SOIL.PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMESTHE DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL, SLOPEDTAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASEFIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THATROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT.DRAINAGE TRENCH AS REQUIRED PERPERCOLATION TEST IN SPEC. AUGER A 4"DIA. HOLE & FILL W/ 34" GRAVEL.PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED ORCOMPACTED SOIL.DIG PLANTING PIT 4-6" DEEPER THANROOTBALL.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.REMOVE BURLAP, WINE, ROPE ANDWIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL.COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO85% OF MAXIMUM DRY UNITWEIGHT PER ASTM D 698.EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEEPLAN.4" BUILT-UP EARTH SAUCERBEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL.3" SHREDDED HARDWOODMULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCHIN CONTACT WITH ROOT FLARE.RODENT TRUNK PROTECTION: 12"HARDWIRE-CLOTH MESHCYLINDER. DIMENSIONS: 8"DIAMETER (OR GREATER) X 36"HEIGHT. STAKE IN PLACE,AVOIDING ROOTS. SEE SPEC.NOTE:CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLEFOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMBPOSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTYPERIOD. STAKING AND GUYING ISMANDATORY FOR TREES 4" CAL ORGREATER, AND ALL BARE ROOT TREES.WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPONAPPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION 32 93 00.5' DIAMETER MULCH RING, TYP.TYPICAL TREE PLANTING DETAIL03L2.0N.T.STYPICAL PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL01L2.0N.T.S3 x A MIN.1'- 6"4"MIN.UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE.STEEL EDGING,AS SPECIFIEDMINIMIZE CONTACTW/ PLANT STEM(S)SET TOP OF ROOT CROWN 1" ABOVEFINISHED GRADE. MOUND PLANTINGBED SOIL SLIGHTLY TO TO TOP OFROOT CROWN.ORGANIC MULCH,AS SPECIFIED.TOP OF MULCH IS TO BELOWTOP OF WALK/CURB EXTENDINGA MIN. OF 1'-6" FROM EDGE OFWALK/CURB.5" DEEP MULCH POCKETCONCRETE WALK MAY OCCURNOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTIONRELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING.PLANTING SOILSCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OFENTIRE BED WITH SPACE BY HANDTO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL.3"MIN.CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALLHAVE ROOTS HAVE LOOSENED.PLANT SPACING02L2.0N.T.SS SSD D 2/3D EDGE OF PLANTING AREAPLANT ROW-TYP.PLANT CENTER-TYP.TRIANGULARSPACING - 'S'DISTANCE BETWEENROWS - 'D'TOTAL AREA PERPLANT (SF)12"15"18"21"24" (2')30"36" (3')42"10-1/2"13"15-1/2"18"21"26"31"36"0.881.351.942.633.505.427.7510.50File Location: C:\Users\baldrich\Desktop\BRIEF\18071 - 7250 France\AUTOCAD\SHEETS\L1.0 LANSCAPE PLAN / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE04LP500N.T.SPLANTING NOTESTURF NOTES1. SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING UNLESS NOTEDOTHERWISE.2. WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OFSOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OFTRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC.3. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALLHAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR INDRAINAGE SWALES, SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY IN STEEPSLOPES AND DRAINAGE AREAS.4. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FORSPRING SEED & SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HASTHAWED TO JUNE 15.5. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TONOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROMAUGUST 15 TO SEPTEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TO SOD/SEEDPLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.1. NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING ANDCONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREAAND ALL PLANTING IS APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.2. PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL PLANTINGBEDS IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF MULCH, FOR WEEDCONTROL.3. NO EXCAVATION OR PLANTING PIT SHALL BE LEFT OPENOVERNIGHT.4. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENTEDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSIZ60.1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALLHAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTALTREES SHALL HAVE NO 'V' CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGINBRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL.STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NOLOWER THAN 6' ABOVE PAVED SURFACE.5. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REFUSEANY PLANT MATERIAL OR ANY DEFECTIVE WORKMANSHIP.6. MEASUREMENT OF CONIFER HEIGHT SHALL INCLUDE NOT MORETHAN FIFTY PERCENT (50%) OF THIS YEARS VERTICAL GROWTH(TOP CANDLE).7. PLANT SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKES PRECEDENCE OVERPLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST.SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES.8. PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED ASSHOWN ON PLAN. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVESTAKING OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO DIGGING.9. SUBSTITUTIONS SHALL ONLY BE ALLOWED WHEN THECONTRACTOR HAS EXHAUSTED ALL SOURCES FOR THE SPECIFIEDMATERIAL, AND HAS PROVEN THAT THE SPECIFIED MATERIAL ISNOT AVAILABLE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE NAME ANDVARIETY OF SUBSTITUTION TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FORAPPROVAL PRIOR TO TAGGING OR PLANTING. SUBSTITUTIONSSHALL BE NEAREST EQUIVALENT SIZE OF VARIETY OF PLANTHAVING SAME ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS. ADJUSTMENTS INLOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED INFIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TOADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS.10. PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS.11. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITHDRIED BONE MEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITHTHE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS ORMAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH ANAPPLICATION OF GRANULAR 10-0-5 OF 12 OZ. PER 2.5" CALIPERTREE AND 6 OZ. PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF10-0-10 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER.12. PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS,ANNUALS OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OFPLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTSSCREENED COMPOST AND 10 PARTS SAND OR AS OTHERWISESPECIFIED.13. TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO-WALLED PLASTICSHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAPSMOOTH-BARKED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIORTO DECEMBER 1 AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1.14. 3/16" THICK STEEL OR ALUMINUM EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAINSHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BEDMEETS SOD - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.15. ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEPSHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER.16. SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH.17. CONIFEROUS TREES ARE TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCH AND SHALL HAVE NO MULCH IN DIRECTCONTACT WITH THE TREE TRUNK.18. ALL DECIDUOUS, PINE, AND LARCH TREE PLANTINGS SHALLRECEIVE RODENT PROTECTION PER MNDOT 2571.31.2. DO NOTPROVIDE ON SPRUCE TREES.19. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANTMATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OFSUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BECONSIDERED.20. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FORSPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION IS FROM THE TIMEGROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15.21. CONIFEROUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TOOCTOBER 1. FALL DECIDUOUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROMTHE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TOPLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THELANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.22. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY THAT EACH EXCAVATED TREE OR SHRUB PIT WILLPERFOLATE (DRAIN) PRIOR TO ADDING TOPSOIL AND INTALLINGPLANT MATERIAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL THE BOTTOM OFSELECTED HOLES WITH SIX INCHES OF WATER. THIS WATERSHOULD PERCOLATE WITHIN A 24-HOUR PERIOD. THE OWNER ORLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL VERIFY ACCURACY AND EFFECT OFPERCOLATION TESTING. IF THE SOIL AT A GIVEN AREA DOES NOTDRAIN PROPERLY, A PVC DRAIN OR GRAVEL SUMP SHALL BEINSTALLED OR PLANTING RELOCATED IF DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.23. SHOULD THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR ENCOUNTERUNSATISFACTORY SURFACE OR OTHER SUBSURFACE DRAINAGECONDITIONS, SOIL DEPTH, LATENT SOILS, HARD PAN, STEAM OFOTHER UTILITY LINES OR OTHER CONDITIONS THAT WILLJEOPARDIZE THE HEALTH AND VIGOR OF THE PLANTS, HE MUSTADVISE THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF THECONDITIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLING THE PLANTS, OTHERWISE THELANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WARRANTS THAT THE PLANTING AREASARE SUITABLE PROPER GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THEPLANTS TO BE INSTALLED.24. ALL HYDRANGEA AND YEW PLANTINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUMTOP SOIL DEPTH OF 12" WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONALCONDITIONS MET:24.1. ALL PLANTS PLANTED A MINIMUM OF 2" ABOVE GRADE24.2. BACKFILL ALL PLANTING HOLES WITH A MIX OF SPECIFIEDGROWING MEDIUM AND TILLED TOPSOIL.24.3. AMEND TOPSOIL WITH ROOT STIMULANT APPROPRIATE FORHYDRANGEAS AND YEWS.24.4. VERIFY PLANTING PITS HAVE PASSED PERCOLATION TEST.GENERAL TREE SPECIFICATIONS:1. ALL STREET AND PARKING LOT TREES SHALL BE LIMBED UP TO THEFOLLOWING HEIGHTS:1.1. 2" CAL. TREES: LOWEST BRANCH 6' HT.1.2. 3" CAL.+ TREES: LOWEST BRANCH 7' HT.2. TREE CANOPY WIDTH SHALL BE RELATIVE TO HEIGHT/CALIPER OFTREE AND TYPE OF TREE.2.1. 1" CALIPER/ 6-8' HT: 3-4' WIDE MIN.2.2. 2" CALIPER/ 12-14' HT: 4-5' WIDE MIN.2.3. 3" CALIPER/ 14-16' HT: 6-7' WIDE MIN.3. CANOPY TREES SHALL NOT HAVE CO-DOMINATE LEADERS INLOWER HALF OF TREE CROWN4. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE SYMMETRICAL OR BALANCED BRANCHINGON ALL SIDES OF THE TREE.5. TREES SHALL NOT BE TIPPED PRUNED.6. TREES SHALL BE SOUND, HEALTHY, VIGOROUS, WELL BRANCHEDAND DENSELY FOLIATED WHEN IN LEAF, FREE OF DISEASE ANDINSECTS, EGGS LARVAE.7. TREES SHALL BE FREE OF PHYSICAL DAMAGE FROM SHIPPING ANDHANDLING. DAMAGED TREES SHALL BE REJECTED.8. SUMMER DUG TREES SHALL HAVE ROOTBALL SIZE INCREASED BY20%.9. TREES WHICH EXCEED RECOMMENDED CALIPER TO HEIGHTRELATIONSHIP SHALL BE REJECTED.DJR ARCHITECTURE, INCCopyright 2008 DJR Architecture, Inc A6333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com CLIENT Issue:Date:Project #: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: CONTRACTOR STRUCTURAL CIVIL BCDE54321PRINT NAME SIGNATURE REGISTRATION NUMBER DATE I hereby certify that this plan,specification, or report was prepared byme or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota.NOT FOR CONSTRUC T I O N PRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EDINA, MINNESOTA 17-124 09.24.2018 EN BA 7200-7250 FRANCE MIXED USE Approver 03.26.2018Designer 530 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 120 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PH: 612-333-3702 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CONFLUENCELP500LANDSCAPE DETAILS AND NOTES DJRARCHITECTURE INC. France Avenue Mixed-Use39 Thank you WENCK File #3022-12 October 15, 2018 Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Phone: 7963-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Prepared for: City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Traffic and Parking Study for 7200 and 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN October 2018 i DRAFT Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................... I 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 1-1 2.0 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 2-1 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................... 3-1 4.0 TRAFFIC FORECASTS ........................................................................ 4-1 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ........................................................................... 5-1 6.0 PARKING ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 6-1 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................... 6-1 8.0 APPENDIX ........................................................................................ 8-1 FIGURES FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................. 2-3 FIGURE 2 SITE PLAN ................................................................................ 2-4 FIGURE 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................. 3-2 FIGURE 4 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES .......................................... 4-4 FIGURE 5 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES............................................ 4-5 FIGURE 6 WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................. 5-6 FIGURE 7 WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR LEVEL OF SERVICE ............................... 5-7 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. __________________________________ DATE: October 15, 2018 Edward F. Terhaar License No. 24441 October 2018 1-1 DRAFT 1.0 Executive Summary The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new residential and retail development located at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located on the west side of France Avenue between Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street. The proposed project location is currently occupied by two office buildings, a parking structure, and surface parking. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue/Hazelton Road • France Avenue/72nd Street • France Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/proposed access • Gallagher Drive/proposed access • 72nd Street/proposed access The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office buildings and constructing two new residential and retail buildings. The project includes 590 on-site parking spaces. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2020. As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on Gallagher Drive, 72nd Street, and France Avenue. The access points on Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street are full movement accesses. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. In order to account for concerns expressed by Hennepin County, the study includes analysis of the following access options on France Avenue: • Right in/right out access • Right in only access • No access on France Avenue The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 54 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 126 net trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 1,681 net weekday daily trips. • Traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at the intersections analyzed to accommodate the proposed project. • From a traffic operations perspective, all access options result in minimal impacts to operations on France Avenue. The option with no access on France Avenue results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher and 72nd Street access locations, but these October 2018 1-2 DRAFT increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. • France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. From these comments it appears Hennepin County will likely not allow access on France Avenue. • Traffic volumes on 72nd Street west of Lynmar Lane are expected to increase from 1,980 vehicles per day to 2,230 vehicles per day, an increase of 250 vehicles per day. • The proposed project is designed to provide both pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding infrastructure. Space for pedestrian amenities is provided along all streets surrounding the project. Access to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is provided at the Gallagher Drive crosswalk. • Both short-term and long-term bicycle spaces should be provided in order to accommodate retail customers and residents. The short-term spaces should be located near building entrances and provide facilities to securely park each bicycle. Long-term spaces for residents should be provided in the parking ramp or in a separate room within each building. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station would help encourage bicycle use by both visitors and residents. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. October 2018 2-1 DRAFT 2.0 Purpose and Background The purpose of this Traffic and Parking Study is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed new residential and retail development located at 7200 and 7250 France Avenue in Edina, MN. The project site is located on the west side of France Avenue between Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street. The proposed project location is currently occupied by two office buildings, a parking structure, and surface parking. The project location is shown in Figure 1. This study examined weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic impacts of the proposed redevelopment at the following intersections: • France Avenue/Hazelton Road • France Avenue/72nd Street • France Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive • France Avenue/proposed access • Gallagher Drive/proposed access • 72nd Street/proposed access Proposed Development Characteristics The proposed project will involve removal of the existing office buildings and constructing two new residential and retail buildings. The project includes 590 on-site parking spaces. The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2020. The current site plan is shown in Figure 2. The proposed land uses and sizes are shown in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Proposed Land Uses and Sizes Land Use Size Unit 7200 Building Apartments 164 DU Townhouses 10 DU Sit-down restaurant 4,000 SF General retail 9,000 SF 7250 Building Apartments 135 DU Sit-down restaurant 4,000 SF General retail 13,000 SF SF = square feet, DU = dwelling units As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on Gallagher Drive, 72nd Street, and France Avenue. The access points on Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street are full movement accesses. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. October 2018 2-2 DRAFT France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. In order to account for these concerns, the study includes analysis of the following access options on France Avenue: • Right in/right out access • Right in only access • No access on France Avenue October 2018 2-3 DRAFT October 2018 2-4 DRAFT October 2018 3-1 DRAFT 3.0 Existing Conditions The proposed site is currently occupied by two office buildings, a parking structure, and surface parking. The site is bounded by France Avenue to the east, Gallagher Drive to the south, 72nd Street to the north, and residential areas to the west. Near the site location, France Avenue is a six-lane divided roadway with turn lanes at major intersections. Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street are a two-lane roadways. Existing conditions at intersections near the proposed project location are shown in Figure 3. France Avenue/Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach proves one left turn and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. France Avenue/72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the eastbound 72nd Street approach. The eastbound approach provides one right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane and three through lanes. The southbound approach provides two through lanes and one through/right turn lane. Left turns are not allowed from 72nd Street onto France Avenue. France Avenue/Gallagher Drive (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one through/right turn lane. The northbound and southbound approaches provide one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) This intersection has four approaches and is controlled with a traffic signal. The westbound approach provides one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane. The eastbound approach proves one left turn and one through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides one left turn lane, two through lanes, and one through/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides one left turn lane, three through lanes, and one right turn lane. Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive (minor street stop sign control) This intersection has three approaches and is controlled with a stop sign on the southbound Gallagher Drive approach. All approaches provide one left turn/through/right turn lane. Turn movement data for the intersections was collected during the weekday a.m. (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 - 6:00 p.m.) peak periods in March 2018. October 2018 3-2 DRAFT October 2018 4-1 DRAFT 4.0 Traffic Forecasts Traffic Forecast Scenarios To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2021. Specifically, weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: • 2018 Existing. Existing volumes were determined through traffic counts at the subject intersections. The existing volume information includes trips generated by the uses currently on the site. • 2021 No-Build. Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by 1.0 percent per year to determine 2021 No-Build volumes. The 1.0 percent per year growth rate was calculated based on both recent growth experienced near the site and projected growth in the area. • 2021 Build. Trips generated by the proposed development were added to the 2021 No-Build volumes to determine 2021 Build volumes. In addition, existing trips generated by the uses currently on the site were subtracted from the total volume. Trip Generation Weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation for the proposed development were calculated based on data presented in the tenth edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trips generated by the existing uses were based on the traffic count data. The resultant trip generation estimates are shown in Table 4-1. October 2018 4-2 DRAFT Table 4-1 Trip Generation for Proposed Project Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak Hour Weekday PM Peak Hour Weekday Daily In Out Total In Out Total Total Proposed Project 7200 Building Apartments and Townhomes 174 DU 16 47 63 47 30 77 947 Restaurant 4,000 SF 22 18 40 24 15 39 449 General Retail 9,000 SF 5 3 8 16 18 34 340 Subtotal 43 68 111 87 63 150 1736 10% internal trip reduction (4) (7) (11) (9) (6) (15) (174) 10% transit reduction (4) (6) (10) (8) (6) (14) (156) Total 35 55 90 70 51 121 1406 7250 Building Apartments 135 DU 13 36 49 36 23 59 734 Restaurant 4,000 SF 22 18 40 24 15 39 449 General Retail 13,000 SF 7 5 12 24 26 50 491 Subtotal 42 59 101 84 64 148 1674 10% internal trip reduction (4) (6) (10) (9) (6) (15) (167) 10% transit reduction (4) (5) (9) (7) (6) (13) (151) Total 34 48 82 68 52 120 1356 Existing Uses Removed 7200 Building Office 39,600 SF (40) (6) (46) (7) (39) (46) (386) 7250 Building Medical office 55,000 SF (58) (14) (72) (25) (44) (69) (695) Total Net Trips (29) 83 54 106 20 126 1681 DU=dwelling unit, SF=square feet Table 1 shows the net number of trips generated by the proposed development including reductions for existing trips. As shown, the project adds 54 net trips during the a.m. peak hour, 126 net trips during the p.m. peak hour, and 1,681 net trips daily. Trip Distribution Percentages Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are as follows: • 30 percent to/from the north on France Avenue • 15 percent to/from the west on 72nd Street • 5 percent to/from the east on Hazelton Road • 5 percent to/from the east on Gallagher Drive • 5 percent to/from the west on Parklawn Avenue • 5 percent to/from the east on Parklawn Avenue • 35 percent to/from the south on France Avenue October 2018 4-3 DRAFT Site Access Options As shown in the site plan, the project includes access on Gallagher Drive, 72nd Street, and France Avenue. The access points on Gallagher Drive and 72nd Street are full movement accesses. The access on France Avenue is restricted to right turns in and out by the existing center median. The study includes analysis of the following access options on France Avenue: • Right in/right out access • Right in only access • No access on France Avenue Traffic Volumes Development trips were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figures 4 and 5. October 2018 4-4 DRAFT October 2018 4-5 DRAFT October 2018 5-1 DRAFT 5.0 Traffic Analysis Intersection Level of Service Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours using Synchro software. Initial analysis was completed using existing geometrics and intersection control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which is defined in terms of traffic delay at the intersection. LOS ranges from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation with excessive delay. The following is a detailed description of the conditions described by each LOS designation: • Level of service A corresponds to a free flow condition with motorists virtually unaffected by the intersection control mechanism. For a signalized or an unsignalized intersection, the average delay per vehicle would be approximately 10 seconds or less. • Level of service B represents stable flow with a high degree of freedom, but with some influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. For a signalized intersection, the average delay ranges from 10 to 20 seconds. An unsignalized intersection would have delays ranging from 10 to 15 seconds for this level. • Level of service C depicts a restricted flow which remains stable, but with significant influence from the intersection control device and the traffic volumes. The general level of comfort and convenience changes noticeably at this level. The delay ranges from 20 to 35 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 15 to 25 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service D corresponds to high-density flow in which speed and freedom are significantly restricted. Though traffic flow remains stable, reductions in comfort and convenience are experienced. The control delay for this level is 35 to 55 seconds for a signalized intersection and 25 to 35 seconds for an unsignalized intersection. • Level of service E represents unstable flow of traffic at or near the capacity of the intersection with poor levels of comfort and convenience. The delay ranges from 55 to 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and from 35 to 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection at this level. • Level of service F represents forced flow in which the volume of traffic approaching the intersection exceeds the volume that can be served. Characteristics often experienced include long queues, stop-and-go waves, poor travel times, low comfort and convenience, and increased accident exposure. Delays over 80 seconds for a signalized intersection and over 50 seconds for an unsignalized intersection correspond to this level of service. October 2018 5-2 DRAFT The LOS results for the study intersections are presented in Figures 6 and 7 and discussed below. France Avenue/Hazelton Road (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS C for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/72nd Street (minor street stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/Gallagher Drive (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/Parklawn Avenue (traffic signal control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS D or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS D for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS E or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS E for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. October 2018 5-3 DRAFT Parklawn Avenue/Gallagher Drive (minor street stop sign control) - During the a.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under existing, 2021 No-Build, and 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. France Avenue/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS C or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. Gallagher Drive/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. 72nd Street/proposed access (minor street stop control) - During the a.m. peak hour under 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS A. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. During the p.m. peak hour under 2021 Build conditions, all movements operate at LOS B or better. The overall intersection operates at LOS A for all scenarios. The traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on the intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at this intersection to accommodate the proposed project. October 2018 5-4 DRAFT France Avenue Access The study included analysis of the following access options on France Avenue: • Right in/right out access • Right in only access • No access on France Avenue As shown in the traffic analysis results, all intersections operate at acceptable levels of service under all three France Avenue access options. From a traffic operations perspective, all access options result in minimal impacts to operations on France Avenue. The option with no access on France Avenue results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher and 72nd Street access locations, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. As described earlier, Hennepin County staff expressed concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. 72nd Street Impacts 72nd Street extends west from France Avenue and provides connections to residential areas west of the project site. 72nd Street is also used to access 70th Street via connections to Cornelia Drive and Wooddale Avenue. Traffic volume data collected for this project indicate a daily volume of 1,980 vehicles on 72nd Street between Heatherton Trail and Glouchester Avenue. Observations indicate that traffic utilizing 72nd Street is a mixture of local trips and trips accessing 70th Street. Under existing conditions, the office building has two access points on 72nd Street. Through observations and data collected at the access locations, approximately 15% of existing site trips use 72nd Street west of Lynmar Lane to access the site. The proposed project includes one access point on 72nd Street. Circulation within the project site includes a continuous north/south drive, which allows the entire site access to 72nd Street. As a result, traffic volumes on 72nd Street are expected to increase with the proposed project. The existing and forecasted volumes on 72nd Street west of Lynmar Lane are shown in Table 5-1. Table 5-1 Weekday Daily Traffic Volumes on 72nd Street West of Lynmar Lane Scenario Daily Volume 2018 1,980 Remove existing use (160) Proposed project +410 2021 Build 2,230 As shown, the daily volume on 72nd Street is expected to increase by 250 vehicles per day. October 2018 5-5 DRAFT Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Under existing conditions, sidewalk is provided on both sides of France Avenue, on the north/west side of Gallagher Drive west of France Avenue, and on the north side of 72nd Street west of France Avenue. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is located on the south/east side of Gallagher Drive. Striped crosswalks and pedestrian signal heads are provided at all signalized intersections along France Avenue. The proposed project is designed to provide both pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding infrastructure. Space for pedestrian amenities is provided along all streets surrounding the project. Access to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is provided at the Gallagher Drive crosswalk. The site plan does not specifically indicate the location or number of bicycle parking spaces. Both short-term and long-term bicycle spaces should be provided in order to accommodate retail customers and residents. The short-term spaces should be located near building entrances and provide facilities to securely park each bicycle. Long-term spaces for residents should be provided in the parking ramp or in a separate room within each building. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station would help encourage bicycle use by both visitors and residents. October 2018 5-6 DRAFT October 2018 5-7 DRAFT October 2018 6-1 DRAFT 6.0 Parking Analysis As described earlier, the project will include 590 on-site parking spaces. The proposed amount of parking was compared to industry standards to determine adequacy. Parking data from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) was used to determine the expected parking demand for the proposed land uses. Data provided in the ITE publication Parking Generation, 4th Edition, indicates the various proposed uses peak at different times during the day. The ITE data was adjusted to account for the expected modal split for the site. Based on the ITE data, the peak weekday parking demand for the overall site occurs between 6 pm and 9 pm. The peak parking demand during that time period is 419 spaces. The 590 spaces provided can accommodate the expected peak parking demand. If the retail and restaurant uses change from those currently assumed, the parking calculations should be updated to ensure adequate on-site parking. October 2018 7-2 DRAFT 7.0 Conclusions and Recommendations The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development is expected to generate 54 net trips during the weekday a.m. peak hour, 126 net trips during the weekday p.m. peak hour, and 1,681 net weekday daily trips. • Traffic generated by the proposed development has minimal impact on intersection operations and does not change the level of service of any movement. No improvements are needed at the intersections analyzed to accommodate the proposed project. • From a traffic operations perspective, all access options result in minimal impacts to operations on France Avenue. The option with no access on France Avenue results in slightly higher volumes at the Gallagher and 72nd Street access locations, but these increases are minimal from an operations standpoint. • France Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. City staff shared the project sketch plan with Hennepin County staff who responded with concerns about the proposed access on France Avenue. Specifically, Hennepin County staff commented that the proposed access falls short of meeting access spacing guidelines and would introduce a new conflict point on the high-volume corridor with the potential for vehicles to weave across three lanes in the southbound direction to make left or U-turns at Gallagher Drive. From these comments it appears Hennepin County will likely not allow access on France Avenue. • Traffic volumes on 72nd Street west of Lynmar Lane are expected to increase from 1,980 vehicles per day to 2,230 vehicles per day, an increase of 250 vehicles per day. • The proposed project is designed to provide both pedestrian and bicycle connections to the surrounding infrastructure. Space for pedestrian amenities is provided along all streets surrounding the project. Access to the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is provided at the Gallagher Drive crosswalk. • Both short-term and long-term bicycle spaces should be provided in order to accommodate retail customers and residents. The short-term spaces should be located near building entrances and provide facilities to securely park each bicycle. Long-term spaces for residents should be provided in the parking ramp or in a separate room within each building. The provision of a bicycle maintenance station would help encourage bicycle use by both visitors and residents. • The proposed number of parking spaces can accommodate the expected peak parking demand based on Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data. October 2018 8-1 DRAFT 8.0 Appendix • Level of Service Worksheets 4120 Parklawn Ave. Edina, Mn 55435 Hand carry 11-28-18 Edina City Hall Edina, MN. 55435 Council Members Mayor James Hovland, Mary Brindle, Mike Fisher, Kevin Staunton, Bob Stewart Re 7200-7250 France Ave project Dear Council Members, Concerns that I have about this project Height of apartment building is too high — prefer at zoned four stories. Attached information shows many comments about too high. Set back on France Ave needs to be 50 feet. Architect's drawings show apartment building as a very massive structure — too big for this location. There will be more traffic on already very busy streets. Therefore please vote no on December 4. Thank you for your work on this project and for your consideration of the above. pko Jo Stahly Edina Home Owner Greater Southdale District Plan July 12, 2018 Open House COMMENTS 1. Post-It Comments on large map Heights — France Avenue — transitions to residential area west of France Ave. 1. Please include architectural guidelines in the 2040 Comp Plan. We don't want to see more buildings that look like the Byerly's apartments built in the area. WE need buildings with brick and stone that blend with our existing buildings. 2. Very alarmed that Design Experience guidelines call for minimum of 8 stories along both sides of France Ave (p. 19). How can you possibly transition from 8 stories to a single-family neighborhood a block or two away? 3. New developments on the west side of France (at least between 69th and Gallagher) should be limited to less than 50' (i.e. 4 stories) to provide transition to residential neighborhood. 4. Maintain current 4 stories (48 ft) on all of west side of France Ave. 5. Leave 4 story limit on west France. 6. No 8 stories on west France Ave. 7. 8 stories minimum will tower over the homes in this area. 8. Define transition zone and keep height to 4 or less stories west of France. 9. Hearty support for 4 stories max. on west side of France Ave. 10. There needs to be a walkway across France for bike and pedestrian traffic. 11. Four stories or less for any property adjacent to homes (including duplexes). 12. More residents here will overwhelm Cornelia Elementary School. What are the plans for that? I feel like pressure is on Cornelia Elem. And I do not want the school to feel even more stressed — resources, class sizes, etc. It is not the right thing to do to the kids and teachers. 13. Put France Ave underground and put a lid on it. 14. We need west side promenade. Good idea. 15. Specify importance of transition to single-family and duplex housing without higher buildings on west side of France than allowed now. 16. Put France Ave below ground green space and easy access to neighborhoods west of France. 17. Want 50' setbacks on France Avenue. 18. Only 4 stories on west side of France Avenue. No more. 19. Keep west side of France 4 stories or less and less than 50 feet high to buffer homes to the west. 20. Agree. This plan focuses on urbanizing Southdale without respecting the suburban housing next door. 21. The west side of France between Gallagher and 69th Street must have a lower density and lower heights (i.e. 4 stories). The neighborhood will never agree to taller, higher density buildings. 22. 4 stories on west side of France is plenty. Maintain foot and bike friendly. 23. Make sure there is a transition zone with a height of 4 stories or less. 1 24. I agree. No more than 4. Transportation and walkability 1. Need better walk and bike paths and public transit options. 2. Bridge over France Ave; maybe dip down road so foot bridge doesn't need to go up so much. 3. The traffic through this area from all the new buildings would be so hard. Can we "close" some streets to keep it less so? 4. Need to close 68th from Valley View to eliminate short cut. 5. Need to address traffic from neighborhood onto 66th and 70th. People use it as short cut. 6. Valley View Road one lane each direction w. bike lanes, larger blvd. and trees, and larger sidewalk. 7. 10 degrees F. and 12 inches of snow - I can't walk here! 8. The push for walkability, while noble, doesn't take in to consideration the mix of elderly residents and moms schlepping kids and groceries in below 0 degrees temperatures. 9. Why aren't we developing Hwy 62 and Hwy 169 for the good of all Edina? 10. Restrict traffic on 66th. No stop signals. 11. Reduce traffic on 70th. 12. We need boulevards and refuges for pedestrians. 13. Transportation must be addressed as part of the plan. The roads we currently have do not work with your aspirations. Cars are not going away anytime soon. 14. Build new infrastructure before buildings. 15. I like the freeway lid idea! Especially if green space goes on top! 16. Consider skyways for bad weather. 17. For all red squares (buildings) we need a place to stand halfway across the street when walking or biking, especially along France Ave and Xerxes. 18. Plant more LARGE trees, elms, oaks, cottonwood and pines and (like the trees at Room and Board). 19. 494 and 62 Access to France: thoughts on improvement? Will there be higher traffic volumes? 20. Expand grassy area close to 72"d. No access. 21. Need an underground walking path between west and east France Avenue. 22. Pedestrian/bike bridge over France Ave for safety. 23. Make Bike Friendly Edina. 24. If possible, route existing traffic to either York or 100. Turn it from a main artery to a secondary one. And add wider sidewalks and bike lanes. 25. Work with County to reduce speeding on France Avenue. Think of families walking by 50 mph traffic. Buildings (design) generally 1. I hope we have a chance of an Estelle-type building(s) project(s) condo. 2. We need more quality projects. Edina has a history of quality. The way the area is developing it is no different from any retail-residential places in Richfield or Bloomington or any other suburb. 3. Continue planning through (Southdale) Mall property. It will not be here forever! 4. Only brick structures. 5. No more ugly buildings, i.e. Byerly's apartments. 6. Height and density. Too much, too soon. 7. Only brick structures to show quality Edina. 2 . (PHOTO OF BUILDING): This is in Uptown — a beautiful building. Classic style blends with all styles. Not trendy. Looks like a lasting, quality building. Looks contrary to Byerly's apartments-Vitamin Shop-Bank of America buildings. Housing and People 1. We need the plan to have policies to protect existing residents who rent. Their rental units are homes every much as single-family homes and condos are. This rental housing is affordable for the most part. The plan should have strategies to maintain these homes. It's cheaper than building NEW affordable housing at today's prices for construction. 2. Please consider and add plans for this area (NE corner between 66th and Highway 62). This could be the place to provide diverse housing and renovation area rather than redevelopment. New development costs are too high. Consider funding programs for renovation, not just for new construction. 3. Work with school district to add a school given the increase in density. Avoid 30-kid classrooms. Infrastructure 1. Wonderful solution to drainage problems. I like waterway in Pentagon Park area. 2. Yes, yes, yes, yes! Wonderful external Centennial Lakes and surround with combination of high rise and townhomes. 3. Great water feature and amenity for high rise homes. Process 1. Where is the facilitator? 2. This table is hard to see with the trace paper on it. 3. What are the experiences you want to have? 4. I agree. I don't like the perception of "Give to Get." 5. Give to Get is a dumb concept. Please get rid of it. It sounds very slippery and people don't understand what it means. 6. Why don't you have a 50-year outlook for the 2040 Comp Plan Update. This makes no sense! 7. Folks come to Edina for peace and quiet. They don't stay to shop. 8. Where Southdale Mall fit into Plan? Why aren't they involved? 9. Need specifics. Ideas are great, but lack specifics. 2. Post-It Comments on large boards Board 1: No Comments Board 2: Why is the Greater Southdale District Plan being prepared? • The work group was formed to address specifically the west side of France. This has been lost over the past three years. • Please start new group for Pentagon Park (see JoAnn) Board 3: Vision Edina • Surely Edina is a suburban community 3 • What does built-to-scale mean? A 360 condo tower a block from a single-family neighborhood? how is that to scale? How is a 19-story building on the Guitar Center site scale to the surrounding buildings? • How will we connect? No Diesel! Electric? • How will we embrace diversity? What are concrete plans for affordable housing in the district? • Better definition of "Built-to-Scale" • "Built-to-Scale" please define — what does it mean when scale is proposed all over the place? • How is a 20-story twin tower next to single story homes "Built-to-Scale"? Rumors is the work group supported this as meeting their vision. • What kind of density in housing, particularly height is envisioned? • Let's keep Edina's standard high. • If you live in Edina and your kids go to Hopkins or Richfield School - how do you home a community of learning? • Too few people of color at this event. Hear from workers who can't live here. • Are we going to be envisioning a diverse future or a white future? Board 4: Why the Greater Southdale District is important to Edina • Few to no housing for many of those who work in Southdale. How will you change that? • "Mixed-use" yuck. Boring Trendy. Not forward thinking. Board 5: Greater Southdale District Vision Statement • You don't need to feel as though you have to invent the "next Southdale" or "Centennial Lakes"! Listen to our consultants. Let them do the design. Board 6: How we Got Here: Working Principles and Framework. No Comments Board 7: Aspiration #1; Imagine evolution organized around human activity, with vibrant streets, beautiful parks and public spaces, and endearing and enduring buildings where ... • We don't want to be Downtown Minneapolis. • What is Edina's optimum population? • Indoor soccer field • Transition on west side France — four floors please. • How will we ensure diverse populations are attracted here, welcome and stay? • West side of France should not be above 3-4 stories in order to serve as a transition to single family R-1. • The guidelines/vision for transition zones should be very clear, reference page 7 of the draft; building scale; height, length, footprint. Board 8: Aspiration #2: Make the Greater Southdale District the model of healthy urban living where ... • How are you factoring in affordable housing at various levels of affordability? • Better use of storm water—great idea! My concern is how will the city maintain ponds/fountains? • France and 66th are already backed up — how does greater density and more retail support "limiting idling vehicles"? Board 9: Aspiration #3: Invent infrastructure matching the district's sense of innovation where ... • Increase incentives for use of solar power! (Atop buildings part of art, on houses). • Too expensive for our climate • Look at Central Park of Maple Grove. Would be great at the Fred. Board 10: Aspiration #4: Create neighborhoods of activity within the broader mixed-use patterns of the district where ... • What does the work group think is a "reasonable" walking distance: 1) summer, 2) winter, 3) on a night/day like tonight (rainy). • Where are these neighborhoods? Show them on the map. Board 11: Aspiration #5: Offer a spectrum of living opportunities distributed in each part of the district where ... 4 • Increased density in the Southdale area cannot make-up for a missing middle class in Edina. We need to maintain single-family residences that help us maintain middle class. • Won't millennials be a fad like baby boomers, gen x and gen y? • Michael mentioned "height and density" as an afterthought. Please bring it to the foreground. • Homeownership not rental projects. • Must attract people who reflect our society. Rentals are essential! • Good concept but unsure how this happens or how city can mandate? • We cannot have more renters than homeowners in Edina. Do you think that renters will vote to increase funding for our schools? If there are too many renters, they will control the city. • The "missing middle" is a great concept — how does the workgroup or what mechanism will make it happen? • What constitutes a public space? How much land? What features are required? How is it accessed? • How you define "missing middle" is very important and may not be how others define it Board 12: Aspiration #6: Expand significantly the number and extent of parks and public spaces where ... • Identify where you see new green spaces. What are the key iconic public spaces? Don't leave this up to developers. Board 13: Aspiration #7: Encourage district evolution based on incremental change and the creation of a great pedestrian experience where ... • Be specific about what needs to happen in the next 10 years to get us there. (can't stay aspirational forever). • Walking is great but if Edina continues to be an aging community and younger households can't afford to live here, you have a real conundrum — support affordable housing at all levels! • I think all of this is directed for a different demographic, not families lugging groceries or elderly residents. • This is all too vague — where are the ideas, concrete ideas you've come up with? Question session, answer needed. • Cliché. Please keep in mind the content of Edina. It is a suburb for a reason. • This is a bad concept. You have to incorporate cars into your concepts more strongly. • Where are older residents living here and it is unreasonable to expect them to walk in negative temperatures. Is the content to keep them homebound? • Buy Southdale and redesign the property. Build apartments there. Board 14: Aspiration #8: Build (or plan for) a street network encouraging pedestrian movement across and through the district where ... • Why stop street grid work at mall borders? Do not assume the mall will be there forever. • Efficient movement of traffic in increasingly vibrant/busy and active areas conflicts w/ pedestrian activity. Already, I see pedestrian crossing Xerxes against lights and mid-block pedestrian traffic at different height? • Write this onto policy and zoning standards. Board 15: Aspiration #9: Imagine transportation in the district where ... • We aren't giving up cars, so you need to plan for them! Board 16: Aspiration #10: Expect the delivery of high quality, well-designed buildings and sites where ... • Love the idea of visible storm water assets. How to maintain? Are you thinking rain garden? • Coordinate storm water efforts, not one-by-one. • Short cuts like Valley View become unintended major streets and should not. • 70th Street with Cornelia should not be a major street. • What happens in winter? Board 17: Aspiration #11: Frame guidance for evolution where ... • How concerned is the work group that their work product will not be dine in time to influence the 2018 comp plan? • How does guidance get the "theta to become reality given that most this too acres is proactively owned. 5 • Better processes that make clear to everyone what is allowed and expected is of most and they need to be consistently followed. Without this, the current stream of "let's try and see what we can get" will only continue. • Speaking of rights, give to get often gives away rights of current residents so developers of new residents get more. • Not sure what you mean here? • No to give to get! Be clear on height, density, character, materials, public realm. Add into zoning then enforce it. Not everything is better through negotiation. • This is a slippery slope. Board 18: Phase 2 Report: Re-Visioning the Southdale District • Plan needs to have specific height, story, and density guidelines. Too many phases here leave this open for failure. • How will we as a community be sure that people of color feel welcome to "come to" and "stay at" Southdale neighborhood. • Not helpful to council or city planning commission. Too General. • First principle here is a slippery slope. 3. Survey Monkey on-line comments 7/12/2018 9:16 PM Thank you for putting notes, ideas, and agenda minutes online for the public to see. It looks like it will take me some hours, to read them all. 7/12/2018 8:47 PM SurveyMonkey is making it difficult for me to do the survey more than once. That's OK, I'll figure it out. Was it SIMON MALLS, the owner of the mall, that got to make the decision to replace the parking lot signs with the ANIMALS on them, into parking lot signs with LETTERS on them? We still miss the ANIMALS. Small details like that, animals on the parking lot signs, turn a paved concrete dystopia, into a fun place to visit. 7/12/2018 8:40 PM At 50th and France, there are three "public" or City lots. There's even a cute little sign telling you where they are, and how full they are. But there is imnAl F" int --- all around the SnuthriaIP Center. You don't park at Southdale and walk to the Library, because, it's a little dangerous to cross the road. You know this. You don't park at the Southdale Library, then walk to Southdale. I mean, I guess some people do. But never during the winter, for that would be crazy. 7/12/2018 8:03 PM Things I like: 1. connection to Schaucher Park 2. Water feature in Fred Richards 3. Western Promenade 4. Focus on smaller blocks, walkability as a priority 5. Biking options 6. Green Roofs 7. Recommendation of step down of height to residential home. Things I don't like: Dismissal of concerns of height and density. I live three blocks from France and our house faces East. I don't want to look out my front window and see a line of buildings. I am opposed to the 8' minimum height on France. I also dislike the "wall of buildings" this creates as you drive down the corridor. I also am concerned about the recommendation of "concrete, steel, or heavy structural frame". There are other materials (e.g. brick) that look classic and timeless. I appreciate everyone's work on this proposal thus far. Thank you to everyone who has worked on this. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-117 APPROVING PRELIMINARY REZONING FROM POD, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT TO PUD-15, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT – 15, INCLUDING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR 7200 & 7250 FRANCE AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of 7200 and 7250 France Avenue. The property is 5.2 acres in size and legally described as follows: Lot 44, Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition, Hennepin County. The North 325 Feet of the East 520 Feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Except Road. (7200 & 7250 France Avenue) 1.02 The proposal is to build two 6-story 67.5 foot tall buildings with 299 units of housing and 30,000 square feet of retail/restaurants. Units would range from 1-3 bedroom units. Additionally there would be 10 owner occupied townhomes. There would be 590 parking spaces for the uses. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following is required: A Rezoning from Pod, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development 1.04 On October 24, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Preliminary Rezoning & Development Plan. Vote: 5 Ayes and 2 Nays. 1.05 On November 7, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. The item was postponed for consideration to December 4, 2018. The applicant was asked to consider revising the plans to include recommendations of the City Council including the reduction of the height of the building. 1.06 The applicant revised the plans by taking the seventh story out and stepping back the sixth story. Section 2. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Rezoning from POD-1, Planned Office District to PUD-15, Planned Unit Development District, and Preliminary Development Plan for 7200 and 7250 France Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-117 Page 2 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed land use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed buildings would be a high quality brick, stone and glass, designed to mix and blend with existing buildings in the area. 3. The PUD would ensure that the building proposed would be the only building built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. 4. Addresses the Development Principles established in the Greater Southdale Area Planning Framework Vision. The following principles are included: Division of the property into smaller blocks to include pedestrian and vehicle access and connection north/south and east/west; Improved pedestrian connections to move people through and around the site. This includes an improved sidewalk along all four lot lines; Provides additional public space along France and Gallagher; High quality design; Improved pedestrian and bike experience at street level; Public art; and Twenty percent (20%) of the project would dedicated for affordable housing within the project. 5. The proposed project would meet the following goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan: a. Movement Patterns. ▪ Provide sidewalks along primary streets and connections to adjacent neighborhoods along secondary streets or walkways. ▪ Provide pedestrian amenities, such as wide sidewalks, street trees, pedestrian-scale lighting, and street furnishings (benches, trash receptacles, etc.) ▪ A Pedestrian-Friendly Environment. Improving the auto-oriented design pattern discussed above under “Issues” will call for guidelines that change the relationship between parking, pedestrian movement and building placement. b. Encourage infill/redevelopment opportunities that optimize use of City infrastructure and that complement area, neighborhood, and/or corridor context and character. c. Support and enhance commercial areas that serve the neighborhoods, the City, and the larger region. d. Increase mixed-use development where supported by adequate infrastructure to minimize traffic congestion, support transit, and diversify the tax base. e. Increase pedestrian and bicycling opportunities and connections between neighborhoods, and with other communities, to improve transportation infrastructure and reduce dependence on the car. f. Buildings should be placed in appropriate proximity to streets creating pedestrian scale. g. Building Placement and Design. Where appropriate, building facades should form a consistent street wall that helps to define the street and enhance the pedestrian RESOLUTION NO. 2018-117 Page 3 environment. On existing auto-oriented development sites, encourage placement of liner buildings close to the street to encourage pedestrian movement. i. Locate prominent buildings to visually define corners and screen parking lots. ii. Locate building entries and storefronts to face the primary street, in addition to any entries oriented towards parking areas. iii. Encourage storefront design of mixed-use buildings at ground floor level, with windows and doors along at least 50% of the front façade. iv. Encourage or require placement of surface parking to the rear or side of buildings, rather than between buildings and the street. 6. The height increase is justified. The City Code requirement for setbacks of buildings over four-stories in height from property zoned R-1, Single Dwelling Unit District would be met for this project. 7. The existing roadways and parking would support the project. WSB conducted a traffic and parking impact study, and concluded that the proposed development could be supported by the existing roads and proposed parking. 8. The proposal meets the City’s criteria for PUD zoning. The PUD zoning would: a. Create a more pedestrian-friendly development with the construction of improved sidewalks and connections to the Promenade. The project would bring vibrancy to the area. b. The building would be of high quality architectural metal, stone, and glass. c. Ensure that the buildings proposed would be the only buildings built on the site, unless an amendment to the PUD is approved by City Council. d. Project would significantly add to the City’s affordable housing stock by providing 20% for affordable housing. e. Provide for a more creative site design, consistent with goals and policies in the Comprehensive Plan. f. Enhance green space and landscaping and utilize sustainable concepts. 9. The proposed uses would be a significant upgrade to the current buildings on the site. The existing parking ramp is in a very poor state of repair. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plans must be generally consistent with the Preliminary Development Plans dated December 4, 2018, as presented to the City Council. Final Plans must be consistent with Architecture Field Office recommendations dated October 17, 2018 regarding building setbacks over 60 feet. The building above 60 feet in height must be stepped in 10 feet. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Chapter 36 of the Zoning Ordinance. A performance bond, letter-of-credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one-half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures at the time of any building permit. 3. Provision of code compliant bike racks for each use near the building entrances. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-117 Page 4 4. The Final Lighting Plan must meet all minimum requirements per Section 36-1260 of the City Code. 5. Roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened per Section 36-1459 of the City Code. 6. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district’s requirements. 7. A Developer’s Agreement/Site Improvement Plan Agreement is required at the time of Final Approval. 8. County approval of the right-in, right out on France Avenue. 9. Of the proposed housing units, 20% of the area must be dedicated for affordable housing and meet the conditions of the City’s affordable housing policy. 10. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the director of engineering’s memo dated October 19, 2018. 11. Compliance with the Wenck Associates Traffic & Parking Study recommendations. 12. Subject to the Zoning Ordinance Amendment creating the PUD-15, Planned Unit Development for this site. 13. Metropolitan Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment regarding density. 14. Dedication of public access easements along the west and north lot line subject to review and approval of the city engineer. The easement shall provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the property to the north, 7200 France Avenue. 15. Final Plans must be consistent with Architecture Field Office recommendations dated October 17, 2018 regarding building setbacks over 60 feet. The building above 60 feet in height must be stepped in 10 feet. 16. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the City’s sustainability division memo dated October 23, 2018. 17. The temporary cell pole must be removed upon the relocation of the cellular antennas being relocated to the roof of the new buildings. 18. Prepare plans for a re-imagined 72nd Street to be considered as part of the final approval. 19. The woonerf shall be designed to prevent cut-through traffic. 20. Work with Hennepin County to have the right turn lane requirement into the site off France eliminated. 21. Add more brick to the face of the building along France Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-117 Page 5 ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2018-116 RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REGARDING DENSITY IN THE OR, OFFICE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 France Equities LLC is requesting a redevelopment of 7200 and 7250 France Avenue. The property is 5.2 acres in size. 1.02 The proposal is to build two 6-story 67.5 foot tall buildings with 299 units of housing and 30,000 square feet of retail/restaurants. Units would range from 1-3 bedroom units. Additionally there would be 10 owner occupied townhomes. There would be 590 parking spaces for the uses. 1.03 To accommodate the request, the following amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is requested: A Comprehensive Plan Amendment to increase density in the OR, Office Residential District from 30 units per acre to 60 units per acre. 1.04 On October 24, 2018, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Vote: 5 Ayes and 2 Nays. 1.05 On November 7, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the request. The item was postponed for consideration to December 4, 2018. The applicant was asked to consider revising the plans to include recommendations of the City Council including the reduction of the height of the building. 1.06 The applicant revised the plans by taking the seventh story out and stepping back the sixth story. Section 2. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment as written below, subject to Metropolitan Council approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2018-116 Page 2 Table 4.3. Future Land Use Categories is amended as follows: Approval is based on the following findings: 1. Higher Densities are generally located on arterial roadways. The OR district is generally located on France Avenue, which connects to both Crosstown 62 and I-494, and 77th street which connects over to Highway 100. Both 77th and France are arterial roadways. The density is consistent with the AUAR densities contemplated for this area. 2. The densities that have been contemplated as part of the Greater Southdale Area Study have been 80-100 units per acre over the whole of the district. Higher Density is contemplated in between France Avenue and York Avenue (100-150 units per acre…the existing CAC area allows up to 105 units per acre, and the MXC, Mixed Use Center allows up to 150 units per acre); and lesser densities 50-80 units per acre west of France and East of York. The City has allowed greater densities on the east side of York (Envi Edina is 105 units per acre; and the Onyx is 52 units per acre. On the west side of France, the Aurora on France project (senior housing) is 80 units per acre. 3. Density proposed is similar or less than density for mixed use areas for surrounding communities including Minnetonka, Minneapolis, Bloomington, Richfield, and St. Louis Park. 4. Allowing higher densities allows the City greater opportunity to provide affordable housing units, which would help the city to achieve its affordable housing goals. The current Metropolitan Council goal for Edina is to build 878 new units by 2030. 5. The traffic studies done by Wenk Associates and WSB concludes that densities contemplated on the west side of France can be supported by the existing roadway system. OR Office-Residential No current examples in City. Potential examples include Pentagon Park area and other I-494 corridor locations Transitional areas along major thoroughfares or between higher- intensity districts and residential districts. Many existing highway- oriented commercial areas are anticipated to transition to this more mixed-use character. Primary uses are offices, attached or multifamily housing. Secondary uses: Limited retail and service uses (not including “big box” retail), limited industrial (fully enclosed), institutional uses, parks and open space. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged, and may be required on larger sites. Upgrade existing streetscape and building appearance, improve pedestrian and transit environment. Encourage structured parking and open space linkages where feasible; emphasize the enhancement of the pedestrian environment. 12-30 residential dwelling units/acre. The City Council may approve a project for up to 60 units per acre through a PUD rezoning at 7200 & 7250 France Avenue. Criteria to justify greater density includes: Addressing the City’s Working Principles for Development Building quality, meeting the city’s Affordable Housing Policy, sustainability, pedestrian oriented development, additional public space and public realm, provision of more green space, underground parking, proximity to low density uses, utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Floor to Area Ratio may exceed 1.0 on a case by case basis, subject to proximity to utilities capacity, level of transit service available, and impact on adjacent roads. Other desired items to allow greater density or density on the high end of the residential housing range above, would include: Below grade parking, provision of park or open space, affordable housing, sustainable design principles, provision of public art, pedestrian circulation, and podium height. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-116 Page 3 ATTEST: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ____ day of __________________, 2018. _________________________________ Sharon Allison, City Clerk Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: VII.B. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Report / Recommendation From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Resolution No. 2018-126: Accepting Various Grants & Donations Action CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: Motion adopting Resolution No. 2018-126. INTRODUCTION: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the departments receiving donations for your consideration. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution No. 126 Donations RESOLUTION NO. 2018-126 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed grants and donations on behalf of its citizens. Parks & Recreation: Braemar Golf Course Memorial Fund Richard Black $50.00 Daniel Moran $100.00 Robert Devereaux $50.00 Robert Teese $25.00 Marshall Lewis $500.00 Leslie Sharpe $50.00 William Cunningham $35.00 Robert Sandilla $50.00 Gregory Baron $25.00 Richard Windam $100.00 Dated: December 4, 2018 Attest: Sharon Allison, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 4, 2018, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ______________ day of ___________________, ____________. City Clerk Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: VIII.A. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Other From:Sharon Allison, Executive Assistant Item Activity: Subject:Correspondences Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Attached are correspondence(s) received since the last City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Description Correspondences City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Paul & Jan Bordonaro 5800 West 70th Street Edina MN 55439 9528416457 no dashes or spaces paul.bordonaro@ms.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. 70th / Cahill -- We attended the Nov 28 Planning mtg in its entirety. (1) Our primary concern is SAFETY. Any higher density plan will result in more vehicle traffic. No mention, no projected amounts. The Plan reports existing traffic patterns but zero validated and professionally analyzed estimates. We are for rejuvenating the 70th/Cahill area; however, professional assessments must be made. The Plan is effectively impossible to approve because it is preliminary and so incomplete. (2) e.g. the incompleteness was embarrassingly noted when it was disclosed the business-critical issues w the adjoining Excel Energy facility were never addressed! That's either negligence or incompetence. (3) a 3 to 5 story height limit was recommended by non-professionals in previous meetings who shot-from-the-hip and decided what was paradoxically described by Ms. Lee as their "comfort zone". Seriously! That is how 3 to 5 stories was determined! Please slow down. MUCH more work is needed. PJB / JMB Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Frank and Carol Sidell 4232 Oakdale Ave S Edina mn 55416 9529201197 no dashes or spaces cesidell@gmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. This is Frank and Carol Sidell and have been Morningside residents for over 30 years. We’re contacting you about the proposed plans for 4532 France Ave. The owners of 4532 France Ave, Jamie & Casey Carl, have been our good neighbors in Morningside for over 12 years. We fully support the proposed plan and improvements the Carl's are prepared to invest in the property. We know that the Carl's are actively involved in the community, Edina schools and the Morningside neighborhood. They have a shared history of successful business experience and we'd like to see them develop their next business opportunity within the France and 44th business district. We believe that development is good for the long-term growth of Edina, but that the development must be done respectively to preserve the character and uniqueness of the neighborhood. We feel this proposal successively achieves both, and ask that you please support the proposed development plan at 4532 France Ave. Thank you! Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png City of Edina Correspondence Submission Correspondence Selection * Data Practices Advisory: Any information submitted through this form will be emailed to all City Council Members and submitted for inclusion in the next public “Council packet.” Council packets are permanent records of materials prepared for City Council meetings. Council packets are public documents that are available in print, published on the City’s website and maintained in permanent electronic records. You are not required to complete any fields of this form. However, if you do not provide your name and street or email address, your comments will not be included in the Council packet. Open Meeting Law City Council Members receive and consider all feedback sent through this form. Because of the open meeting law, Council Members cannot engage in back-and-forth emails involving a quorum of three or more members. For that reason, you might not receive a response from them. You might also receive a response from a City staff member. Email City Council: If you only want to email the City Council and not send your comments for publishing, contact members at CityCouncil@EdinaMN.gov. Contact Executive Assistant Sharon Allison, at SAllison@EdinaMN.gov, if you have any questions or require assistance. Council Packet Deadline Correspondence must be received by noon the Thursday prior to a City Council meeting in order to ensure it is published in the packet prior to the Council meeting. Submissions after that time may be included in a future Council packet. Name * Street Address City State Zip Code Phone Number Email Mayor & City Council Jennifer Stevens 4224 Oakdale Ave S Edina MN 55416 6128014116 no dashes or spaces stevens.jenner@gmail.com Comments * File Upload By submitting this form, I have read and agree to the Data Practices Advisory above. This is Jennifer and Mark Stevens and we live at 4224 Oakdale Avenue in Edina and are Morningside residents. We're contacting you about the proposed plans for 4532 France Avenue. The owners of 4532 France Avenue, Jamie and Casey Carl, are our neighbors in the Morningside neighborhood. We fully support the proposed plan and improvements the Carls are prepared to invest in the property. The Carls are actively involved in the community, Edina schools and the Morningside neighborhood. They have a shared history of successful business experience and we'd like to see them develop their next business opportunity within the France and 44th business district. We believe that development is good for the long-term growth of Edina, but that the development must be done respectively to preserve the character and uniqueness of the neighborhood. We feel this proposal successfully achieves both, and ask that you please support the proposed development at 4532 France Avenue. Attachments allowed: pdf, jpg, png Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: B.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Casey Casella, City Management Fellow Item Activity: Subject:MINUTES: Energy and Environment Commission October 11, 2018 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: Receive the Energy and Environment Commission minutes of October 11, 2018. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes of Oct. 11, 2018 Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/8/2018 Minutes City Of Edina, Minnesota Energy and Environment Commission Edina City Hall Community Room Thursday, October 11 2018, 7:00 PM I. Call To Order Chair Jackson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering Roll Call were Chair Jackson, Commissioners Horan, Hussain, Kostuch, Manser, Satterlee Lanzas, Hoffman, Glahn and Fernands, Maynor Absent: Seeley Staff Present: Liaison Brown, Casey Casella III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda Manser made a motion to approve the October 11, 2018 meeting agenda. Kostuch seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion made by Hoffman to approve the September 13, 2018 minutes. Motion seconded by Horan. Motion carried. VI. Community Comment A. Zoe, a student at Edina High School, introduced herself to the Commission. VII. Reports/Recommendation A. Comprehensive Plan Haila Maze, a consultant working on the Edina Comprehensive Plan, was in attendance to answer questions on the Chapter 10 Comprehensive Plan draft. The Commission reviewed the Comprehensive Plan chapter and provided comments and edits. The Commission decided to table the discussion on the “highlights” section of the Comprehensive Plan until the November 8, 2018 meeting. VIII. Correspondence And Petitions A. Food Waste Policy Proposal Commission received a letter from previous resident regarding Food Waste Policy. Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/8/2018 IX. Chair And Member Comments A. 2019 Work Plan Update Chair Jackson provided an update on the discussion of the EEC Work Plan with the City Council on October 2, 2018 at the City Council Work Session. Key themes chair Jackson identified from the City Council discussion were: • Agreement on the City leading by example. • Sustainability as a key theme across other commissions. B. Removal of Working Group Members Commissioner Glahn made a motion to remove Mike Woolsey and David Goldstein from the Business Environmental Working Group (BEWG). Hoffman seconded. All voted aye. Motion carries. X. Staff Comments A. SolSmart Update and Proposed Zoning Amendments Due to time constraints, the solar discussion was rescheduled to the December 13, 2018 EEC meeting. B. Comp Plan Chapter 8 Water Draft The Commission received a draft of the Chapter 8 Comprehensive Plan. XII. Adjournment Motion made by Glahn to adjourn the October 11, 2018 meeting at 9:25 p.m. Motion seconded by Hoffman. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Casey Casella City Management Fellow Draft Minutes☐ Approved Minutes☒ Approved Date: 11/8/2018 Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: B.2. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:Jeff Brown, Community Health Administrator Item Activity: Subject:MINUTES: Community Health Commission: October 8, 2018 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: Community Health Commission Minutes, October 8, 2018. ATTACHMENTS: Description Minutes: CHC: October 8, 2018 MINUTES Community Health Commission October 8, 2018 at 6:30 PM City Hall, Community Room I.Call To Order II.Roll Call Present: Christy Zilka, Steve Sarles, Greg Wright, Dena Soukup, Julia Selleys, Britta Orr, Amanda Herr. Absent: Andrew Johnson-Cowley, Alison Pence, Anushka Thorat, Om Jahagirdar III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda Motion by Greg Wright to approve meeting agenda. Seconded by Amanda Herr. Motion Carried. IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes Motion by Greg Wright to approve meeting minutes. Seconded by Steve Sarles. Motion Carried. A.Approval of September 17, 2018 Minutes V.Community Comment VI.Reports/Recommendations A.2019 Work Plan Review/Edit/Approval Review of work plan presented to City Council at previous work session. Vaping item in parking lot likely to be moved to create additional work plan item. Motion by Greg Wright to approve draft 2019 work plan. Seconded by Dena Soukup. Motion Carried. VII.Chair And Member Comments General discussion with guests regarding commission role and previous activity related to tobacco 21 ordinance. VIII.Staff Comments A.November Meeting Date Reminder - November 19th IX.Adjournment Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: B.3. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Minutes From:MJ Lamon, Project Coordinator Item Activity: Subject:Minutes: Human Rights and Relations Commission, October 23, 2018 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None. INTRODUCTION: ATTACHMENTS: Description Approved HRRC Minutes: 10/23/18 Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Minutes City of Edina, Minnesota Human Rights and Relations Commission Edina City Hall, Community Room October 23, 2018 7:00 p.m. I. Call to Order Chair Nelson called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering Roll Call: Commissioners Arseneault, Nelson, Kennedy, Epstein, Edwards, Stringer Moore, and Waldron. Absent: Beringer. Commissioner Moss Keys and Meek arrived at 7:10 p.m. Commissioner Edelson arrived at 7:30 p.m. Staff Present: MJ Lamon and Sharon Allison. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion by Commissioner Kennedy, seconded by Commissioner Edwards approving the meeting agenda for October 23, 2018. Motion carried. IV. Approval of Meeting Minutes Motion by Commissioner Arseneault, seconded by Commissioner Kennedy, approving the September 25, 2018, amended minutes. Motion carried. V. Community Comment – None. VI. Reports and Recommendations A. 2018 Work Plan Updates 1. Sharing Values, Sharing Communities Commissioner Meek updated the HRRC on their community event, Breaking Stigma: A Look At Mental Health In Our Communities. She said it was a great event with five panelists that responded to a series of pre-designed questions. Some responses included firsthand experience from some of the panelists who either struggled with depression or have family members that do. 2. Comprehensive Plan: Human Rights Chapter Commissioner Arseneault said there are several minor edits still to be done. The following was suggested as a title for the chapter - Edina: Building a Human Rights City with Race Equity For All. The next step is to forward the chapter to the consultants. Motion by Commissioner Kennedy seconded by Commissioner Stringer Moore to title the Human Rights Chapter as Edina: Building a Human Rights City with Race Equity For All. Motion carried. Motion by Commissioner Kennedy seconded by Commissioner Arseneault approving the Human Rights Chapter. Motion carried. Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: 3. Comprehensive Plan: Housing Chapter The Housing Chapter comments were drafted by Chair Nelson. No feedback was received. The chapter comments will be forwarded to the consultant. Motion by Commissioner Kennedy seconded by Commissioner Meeks approving the Housing Chapter. Motion carried. 4. 2018 Tom Oye A lengthy discussion ensued regarding selecting multiple nominees to receive the award and to include a student category. Motion by Commissioner Stringer Moore seconded by Commissioner Edelson to include two categories for the award, an adult and a student category for 2018. Ayes: Stringer Moore, Edelson Nay: Arseneault, Kennedy, Nelson, Epstein, Edwards Abstain: Meek Motion failed. Motion by Commissioner Kennedy seconded by Commissioner Arseneault to give one award. Ayes: Kennedy, Nelson, Epstein, Arseneault Nay: Edwards, Edelson Abstain: Meek, Stringer Moore Motion carried. Mr. Arnold Bigbee was selected from the four nominees to receive the 2018 Tom Oye Human Rights Award. Motion by Commissioner Kennedy seconded by Commissioner Stringer Moore to award the 2018 Tom Oye Human Rights Award to Arnold Bigbee. Motion carried. VI. Chair and Member Comments Chair Nelson said the chair of the Arts and Culture Commission reached out to him to talk about working jointly on arts in Edina. Commissioner Arseneault would like to meet this fall to begin planning the 2019 Days of Remembrance event. (Arseneault/Epstein/Edwards/Beringer) Student Commissioner Waldron would like to work on outreach via social media, etc. to bring awareness to students of City activities or events. Student Commissioner Moss-Keys concurred. Commissioner Stringer Moore asked if commissioners were interested in doing the IDI testing that was offered by the school district and there was consensus to do the testing. VII. Staff Comments - None. VIII. Adjournment Draft Minutes☒ Approved Minutes☐ Approved Date: Motion by Commissioner Kennedy to adjourn the meeting. Seconded by Commissioner Edelson. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. J F A(3) A(24) M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs. Attendance % Meetings/Work Sessions 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 NAME Arseneault, Pat 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Nelson, Jim 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 90% Kennedy, Ellen 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Stringer Moore, Jasmine Brett 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 88% Meek, Michelle 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Epstein, Michael (Ep-Steen)1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 100% Edwards, Cindy 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 100% Edelson, Heather 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Beringer, Catherine 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8 80% Moss-Keys, Tiara (Student)1 1 2 20% Waldron, Shin Bee (student)1 1 2 20% HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: C.1. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: Advisory Communication From:Mark Nolan, AICP, Transportation Planner Item Activity: Subject:Transportation Commission Advisory Communication: Beard Ave Sidewalk in Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: INTRODUCTION: See attached Advisory Communication. ATTACHMENTS: Description Advisory Communication: Beard Avenue Sidewalk The ETC recommends the sidewalk along Beard Ave be included with the street reconstruction. Adding a sidewalk while streets are being reconstructed is much easier than trying to retrofit one in later. We are building a sidewalk network for the future. New families moving to Edina generally consider sidewalks to be a highly desired feature of their neighborhood. Safe walking routes advance our progress in making Edina a healthy, vibrant and connected community. On the following page is a snapshot of the map taken from the Draft Edina Engineering Study BA-451. Date: December 4, 2018 To: Mayor and City Council From: Transportation Commission Subject: Beard Ave Sidewalk in Chowen Park A/B Neighborhood Reconstruction Action Requested: The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) recommends City Council approve the inclusion of the sidewalk with the street reconstruction. Situation: This sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalk on Beard Avenue south of West 60th Street and to future pedestrian facilities on West 60th Street, West 58th Street and Beard Avenue north of West 58th Street. Recommendation and Rationale: Page 2 Prepared by: Larry Olson Reviewed by: Kirk Johnson Date: November 15, 2018 Date: December 4, 2018 Agenda Item #: XII. To:Mayor and City Council Item Type: From:Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Item Activity: Subject:Schedule of Meetings and Events as of December 4, 2018 Information CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 www.edinamn.gov ACTION REQUESTED: None INTRODUCTION: See attached. ATTACHMENTS: Description Schedule of Meetings & Events as of December 4, 2018 CITY COUNCIL SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS AS OF DECEMBER 4, 2018 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS/DATES/EVENTS Tues Dec 4 Work Session: 58TH Street Engagement Process Pilot 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Meeting: Arts & Culture Commission 6:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS HRA Regular Meeting-Immediately Following City Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Dec 10 Special City Council: Public Improvement Hearings 2019 Projects 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Dec 13 HRA Regular Meeting 7:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 16 Work Session: Housing Policy, Rental Inspections & Licensing Programs 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 25 CHRISTMAS HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Thur Deb 27 HRA Regular Meeting 7:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Jan 7 Work Session: To Be Determined 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Jan 17 HRA Regular Meeting 7:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jan 21 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed Jan 23 Work Session: Intergovernmental Representation/Joint Meeting with State Legislative Delegation 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Jan 31 HRA Regular Meeting 7:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Feb 5 Work Session: City Manager Performance Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Feb 14 HRA Regular Meeting 7:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Feb 18 PRESIDENTS’ DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED – City Hall Closed Wed Feb 20 Work Session: Comprehensive Plan Update 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Feb 28 HRA Regular Meeting 7:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Mar 5 Work Session: Community Engagement 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Mar 14 HRA Regular Meeting 7:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Mar 19 Work Session: Community Engagement 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Mar 28 HRA Regular Meeting 7:30 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS