HomeMy WebLinkAbout19690303_regular49 i
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL mLD AT VILLAGE HALL ON
MONDAY, MARCH 3, 1969
Members answering rollcall were Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, Shaw and Van
Valkenburg who served as Mayor Pro Tem in the absence of Mayor Bredesen.
STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-138 APPROVED. Affidavits of Publication in the Edind
Sun on February 20 and 27 and of Mailing on February 21, 1969 were presented by
Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice
given, public hearing was conducted and action taken as hereinafter recorded for
CONSTRUCTION OF OPENING, GRADING, GRAVELING, PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN TH!3 FOLLOWING:
Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at $3,294.14, proposed"t0
be assessed against abutting properties.
this improvement at the meeting of January 20, 1969, pending receipt of the
Village Attorney's opinion as to the legality of placing a barricade on a
public street.
indicating whether the Village has the authority to regulate traffic on streets
or public roads by installation of a barrier and that from the few cases on the
East Coast, it would appear that this action could be taken only in the event
of an actual traffic problem and not merely in anticipation of a problem. At
the request of Dr. Henry Einan, 4908.SUnnysi.de Road, who advised that he was
acting as neighborhood spokesman, Mayor Pro,Tem VanValkenburg read the letter of
Dr. K. A. Prem which had' been sent to Council. 'This letter stated that residents
would support opening the road with a limited, inexpensive improvement without
curb and gutter, provided a gate is installed.
tion protesting the improvement has now been signed by all residents on Sunny-
side Road.
Fire Chief James McNellis urging the improvement as proposed as a measure of
public safety.
4602 Sunnyside Road, Mrs. A. C. Brion, 4706 Sunnyside Road, and three unidenti-
fied gentlemen repeated charges made at the previous hearing that this simprove-
ment is not necessae.
to provide adequate protection for all citizens and that since the Village
Attorney has advised that a barrier cannot be installed in anticipation of a
traffic problem, he moved that the improvement be constructed as proposed, with
a traffic count to be taken at the present time and one taken after the improve-
ment is completed. If there is an appreciable increase in traffic over that
period of time, a gate will be erected which would be used only be emergency-
vehicles.
replied to a charge from a member of the audience that he deeply resented the
allegation that the matter was predetermined, emphasizing that Council makes no
decisions before a hearing is conducted and that Council's actions are taken
only in the interest"of all citizens.
the possibility of installing the road as proposed.and in view of the adamant
position of property owners, that the gate shoul'd now be installed,even against
the advise of the Village Attorney.
warning that if a barrier is installed, this matter could be challenged at some
future time and that the Village would not pay to defend any such suit,
man Courtney then moved that the improvement be authorized with immediate installa-
tion of a gate which will be used only in the event of an emergency.
seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
following resolution and moved its adoption:
' Mackey Avenue from 160' North of Sunnyside Road to West 44th Street
I
He recalled that Council had tabled
Mr. Uhitlock advised that he could find no Minnesota cases
Dr. Einan advised that the peti-
Mr. Hyde presented'letters from Police Captain Bert Merfeld and from
Mr. and Mrs. Ben Bermel, 4603 Sunnyside*Road, Mr, Robert Burley,
.
Councilman Shaw stated that it is the duty of the Council
Additional discussion ensued following which Councilman Courtney
Mayor Pro-Tem VanValkenburg then suggested
Councilman-Shaw then withdrew his motion,
Council-
Motion was
Councilman Courtney then offered the
-
RESOLUTION ORDERING STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-138
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this
Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to
cwners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following
proposed improvement:
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING:
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being
fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the
construction of said improvement, including construction of a gate to be used
only in case of emergency and including all proceedings which may be necessary
in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for
construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is
hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as
STREET IMPROVENENT BA-138; and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall
include Lots 2 ihru 13 incl., Block 2, Lots 1 thru 8 incl., Block 3, Lots 4
CONSTRUCTION OF OPENING, GWING , GRAVELING, PE-ENT STREET SURFACING AND
Efackey Avenue from 160' North of Sunnyside Road to l?est 44th Street I
3/3/69
' 50 I
thru 22, incl., Block 4, Country Club District Brown Section, Lot 7, Block 1
and Lot 1, Block 2, Arden Park Third Addition.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw and on
rollcall there were four ayes and no nays and the .resolution was adopted.
because he felt that the improvementaou
included in the project.
Council-
SOLID WASTE COLLECTION HAULERS TO BE LICENSED TO OPERATE THROUGHOUT VILLAGE.
Mr. Hyde advised Council that the exceptionally large audience in attendance at
this meeting appeared to be in response to a card sent by Lake Harriet and Edina
Sanitation to its customers protesting-the proposal to divide the Village into
districts and taking bids for solid waste collection in each district. He noted
that in addition to the large crowd in attendance, over 75 telephone calls and
114 letters had been received protesting this proposal. Councilman Johnson said
that the only reasons that districts had been suggested was to attempt to solve
the problem of unsatisfactory refuse collection which had caused a critical situ-
ation for the past two or three months. He recalled that Mr. Edward Drury, owner
of Lake Harriet & Edina Sanitation, had advised at the last Council Meeting that
in a matter of two months he could service the entire Villag6, if necessary. A
member of the audience was assured by Nr. Drury that he was not being coerced into
making any statement which would commit him to taking any-additional customers.
He said that he would be able to take any additional customers who are not satis-
fied with their present hauler and that he has adequate means of disposing of
any refuse which he picks up. Many comments from the audience were heard, many
were from unidentified voices and most were statements rather than questions.
Shaw pointed out to ISr. Drury that his postcard was untrue in that it indicated
prior action by the Council and Mr. Drury said this was to get the people to the
meeting. The proposed districting plan was never explained to the audience be-
cause of the noise and shouting.
districting the Village for refuse collection be tabled &d that the Village
Attorney be instructed to draft an ordinance for consideration at the meeting
of Efarch 17, 1969, which would provide for a bond for all licensed haulers.
Motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 26%-179 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING.
ance No. 261-179 for Second Reading as recommended by the Planning Commission,
whereupon Councilman Johnson offered the following ordinance for Second Reading
and moved its adoption as follows:
Mr.
Councilman Johnson's motion that the idea of
Mr. Hoisington presented Ordin-
ORDINANCE NO. 261-179
AN ORDINANCE &ENDING ORDINANCE NO, 261
(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA
ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDING
DISTRICT 0-1 AND SINGLE FAMILY DIIELLING
DISTRICT R-1
THJI VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, NINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Sedtion 1. Paragraph 1. Office Building District Boundaries of Section 8,
(Office Building District) of Ordinance 261 of revised ordinances of the Village .- - of Edina, is hereby amended by adding the following subparagraph:
District 0- 1 :
(cc) A tract of land rectangular in shape in the Northwest comer of the
tract of land hereinafter described, being 500 ft. parallel with .
County Road No. 18 and 300 Et. deep, to wit: The Vest 600 ft. of the
East 100G.1 ft. of that part of the West one-half of the Southwest
One-Quarter (W. 1/2 of SFJ 1/4) lying South of the North 350 ft. thereof;
and that part of the Vest one-half of the Southwest One-Quarter (11. 1/2
of S17 1/4) lying FJest of the East 1000.1 ft. thereof, excluding roads
in Section 30, Township 13.7, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Sec. 2. Paragraph 1, Limits of District, of Section 3,. (Single Family
Dwelling District) of Ordinance 261, of revised ordinances of the Village of
Edina, is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph:
District R-1:
That property formerly zoned Light Industrial District and not des-
cribed in Ordinance No. 261-178 or in this Ordinance, is hereby con-
sidered to be reclassified Single Family Dwelling District R-1.
Lady of Grace Church Property East of Minneapolis, Northfield & South-
ern Railroad).
(Our
5 .k
3/3/69
a
Sec. 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
rollcall there were four ayes and nc
ATTEST :
ORDINANCE NO. 261-178 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. Nr. Hoisington presented
Ordinance NO. 261-178 for Second Reading, noting that no changes had been made
since First Reading was granted on February 24, 1969.
upon offered Ordinance No. 261-178 for Second Reading and moved its adoption
Councilman Shaw 'there-
as follows:
.AN
ORDINANCE NO. 261-178
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 261)
AS TO REGULATIONS IN EFBECT IN EACH DISTRICT,
ABOLISHING T'HE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AND
ANENDING PROVISIONS AS TO FRONTAGE OF BUILDINGS
AND FEES FOR PETITIONS AND REZONING
THE VIUGE COUNCIL OF THE VIWGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
lage of Edina is hereby amended to read as follows:
"Districts Established '
Section 1. Section 2 of Ordinance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Vil-
"Section 2.
"For purposes of this ordinance, the Village shall be divided into the
following districts', and the uses of structures and lands, the height of build-
ings and the area of premises for buildings are to be uniform in each district:
Single Family Dwelling District (Section 3)
Multiple Residence District (Section 4)
Automobile Parking District (Section 5)
Regional Medical District (Section 7)
Office Building District (Section 8)
Commercial District (Section 9)
Planned Industrial District (Section 10)
(Section' 6 repealed)
The boundaries of said districts shall be as further provided herein..
building shall be erected or premises used for any purpose unless in compliance
with the use, height, area and other regulations and restrictions prescribed
for the district in which such building or premises are located."
paragraph 2 (Specific Uses) oE Section 3 (Single Family Dwelling District) of
said ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
by not more than two persons per dwelling unit; provided that such occupation
does not involve the sale of products in the home, that no employee, other than
the occupants of the dwelling, are engaged in such activities, that no exterior
structural alterations shall be made to change the residential character of
the structure, that no outdoor activities are carried on in connection with
such use including loading and unloading, that parking generated by such use
shall be accommodated within the normal driveway area, that no signs of any
kind shall be used to identify the use, and that the essential charagtc::: of
the lot or structure, in terms of use and appearance, will not be changed in
the slightest degree by the occurrence of such activities.''
Section 3. Subparagraph (F) (Setbacks and Yards) of paragraph 3.
(Restrictions) of Section 4 (Multiple Residence District) of said ordinance
No
Sec. 2. Subsubparagraph (9) of subparagraph (b) (Accessory Uses) of
"(9) Customary home occupations, including rental of rooms for occupancy
is hereby amended to read as follows:
District Front 8idl Yard Interior Side Rear
"(f) Setbacks and Yards -- 15 feet 10f; feet 40 feet R- 2 30 feet
R- 3 35 feet 30 feet 20 feet 40 feet
*Add 6 inches for each foot the average height of the house exceeds 15 feet.
line shall be.no less than 35 feet or the average height of the building, which-
ever is greater.
average height shall have an average r'ront'yard setback of not less than a
distance equal to twice its average height,
5 or 6 stories-in height shall be no closer to any R-1 District properties,
except those utilized for non-residential purposes, than 2 times the average
In Districts R-4 and R-5, t.he minimum *building setback from any property
A building whose lengtt is equal to or exceeds 4 times its
In the R-5 District, any structure
i 3/3/69
height of the building.
than 3 times the building height and for a structure 9 or more stories in . .
height, the setback shall be no less than 4 times the building height from any
height, the setback shall be no less than 4 times the building height from any
R-1 District properties, except those utilized for non-residential purposes."
of Section 4 (PIdtiple Residence District) of said ordinance -is hereby amended
to read as follows:
garbage and trash is permissible as to row houses or multiple residence sites
of four units or less, but not as to row houses or multiple residence sites of
five or more units.
except in an accessory building completely enclosed by walls and ro6f."
repealed and rescinded.
The first paragraph if subparagraph (d) (Off-street Parking) of
paragraph 3 (Restrictions) of Section 7 (Regional lriedical District) of said
ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
Off-street Parkinp. A minimum of one off-street parlcing space shall
be provided on the building lot for each 200 square feet of gross floor atea
within the building.
200 feet thereof; provided, such parking space is not separated from the building
site by a pEblic street right-of-way."
of said ordinance is hereby amended by adding thereto a subparagraph reading as
follows :
trash or garbage is permissible. No exterior storage of trash or garbage is
permissible except in an accessory building completely enclosed'by walls and
roof
Paragraph 3 (Restrictions) of Section 8 (Office Building District)
of said ordinance is hereby amended by adding thereto a subparagraph reading as
follows :
"(h) Trash and Garbage Incinerators; Storage. No exterior incir.eration of
trash or garbage is permissible.
permississibJo except in an accessory building completely enclosed by walls and
roof. It
Required-) .(3), of paragraph 9 (Requirements for Vehicular ,and Pedestrian Circu-
lation, Off-street Parking and Loading) of Section 9 (Commercial District)
.of said ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
For a 7 or 8 story structure, the setback shall be no less
Sec. 4. Subparagraph (i) of paragraph 4 (Building Design and Construction)
"(i) Trash and Garbage Incinerators; Storage. Exterior incineration of
There shall be no exterior storage of trash or garbage
- Sec. 5. Section 6 (Light Industrial District) of said ordinance is hereby
Sec. 6
"(d)
Parking shall be provided on the building lot or within
Sec. 7. Paragraph 3 (Restrictions) of Section 7 (Regional Medical District)
"(g) Trash and Garbage 'Incinerators; Storape. No exterior incineration of'
Sec. 8.
I No exterior storage of trash or garbage is
See. 9. Subparagraph B (Off-street Parking), (s) (Number of Spaces
"(3) Offices:
Sec. 10.
(Commercial District) of said ordinance is hereby amended by adding thereto a
1 space for each 200 square feet of floor space."
Paragraph 11 (Building Design and Construction) of Section 9 - subparagraph reading as follows : c.
"(cy ?'a exterior incineration of trash or garbage is permissible. No
exterior storage of trash or garbage is permissible except in an accessory
building completely enclosed by walls and roof."
(Wastes) of paragraph 6 (Restrictions, etc.) of Section 10 (Planned Industrial
District) of said ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
"(7) Wastes. All solid waste material, debris, refuge or garbage shall
be kept within a completely enclosed building and properly contained in a closed
container designed for such purpose.
garbage is permissible.
matter shall be discharged either into a public sanitary sewer or treated in
a manner prescribed by the Village Health Department.
waste discharge into the Village sanitary sewerage system shall not exceed 200
gallons per site per hour between the hours of 9 a.m. and noon.'l
SEc.Fk2.
(Administration) of said ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
"5. Frontage of Buildings on Streets. Every building on a'lot khich abuts
on two or more streets or alleys shall front on such street as was provided by
the original plat, and it shall be presumed, in the absence 0.f evidence to the
contxary, that a building shall front on that street on which the lot on which
it stands has the least number of front feet. However, in the Single Family
Dwelling District, a building on a corner lot may front on the side street if the
immediately adjacent lot on the side street,also fronts on the side street."
Appeals) of paragraph 7 (Board of Appeals and Adjustments, etc.) of Section 15
(Administration) of said ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 11. The first paragraph of subparagraph (a) (Residual Features) (7)
No exterior incineration of trash or
All liquid wastes containing any organic or toxic
The rate of liquid
Paragraph 5 (Frontage of Buildings on Streets] of Section 15
Sec. 13. The first paragraph of subparagraph (d) (Petition by Owner; Fees;
3/3/69 {
"(d) Petition by Owner; Fees; Appeals. The owner or owners of land may file
a petition for transfer of land to another district, for an amendment of the
regulations applicable in any district, or for a variance with the Planning
Department, and shall pay a fee according to the following schedule:
Fee Type of Request Area Involved -
Variance any area $10.00
Change of Regulations any area No charge
Erangfer.'o% :@Ad -toiAnother under 20,000 sq, ft, $25.00
under 50,000 sq. ft. 50 .OO
portion thereof over 50,000 25.00 but not to
sq. feet exceed a total
fee of $200.00
District Over 20,000 sq. ft. but:
Each 50,000 square ft. or
The fee shall be paid at the time of filing the petition and shall not be
refundable. I'
Sec. 14. Subparagraph (c) (2) (d) (Off-street Parking) (2) of paragraph 6
(Restrictions, Controls and Design Standards) of Section 10 (Planned Industrial
District) of said ordinance is'hereby amended to read as follows:
gross floor area within the building."
"(2) Offices: One off-street parking space for each 200 square feet of N m m 6p Sec. 15. Subparagraph (a) (Setbacks and Yards) of Paragraph f~. (Require- a ments) of Section 3 (Single Family Dwelling District) of said ordinance is a hereby amended by adding thereto a subparagraph reading as follows:
be constructed within three feet of a side property line',"
upon its p,assage and publication.
Upon being assured by Mr. Hoisington that he would review parking requirements
in the Regional Medical District and that a multiple chamber combusfhn bhm'er
is required for exterior incineration of garbage, motion for adoption of the
uzdiim&&e 7 was seconded by Councilman
ayes and no nays and the resolution wa
ATTEST:
"(4)
Sec. 16.
Roof Projections Into Required Side Yards'. A house roof may not
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
BIDS AWARDED FOR VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Bdvkrtisement for Bids
were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file.
Hyde presented tabulation of five bids received for Sanitary Sewer No. 278
and Watermain No. 236 showing Northern Contracting Conipany low bidder at $28,968.60;
G.L. Contracting, Inc., at $31,567.40; Phelps-Drake Co., Inc., at $38,023.10;
Peter Lametti Construction Co. at $38,199.15 and Metropolitan Sewer &Water
Corp. at $42,230.61 against Engineer's estimate of $29,077.00. Tabulation of
five bidders for Sanitary Sewer No. 279 and Watermain No. 237 showed Northern
Contracting Co. low bidder at $18,781.90; Phelps-Drake Co., Inc., at $22,348.20;
G. L. Contracting, Inc., at $23,028.00; Peter Lametti Construction Co. at
$27,273.92 and Metropolitan Sewer & Water Corporation at $31,277.49, as against
Engineer's estimate of $21,485.50.
281, Watermain No. 240 and Grading & Graveling No. C-98 showed Mdtt Bullock
Contracting Co., Inc. low bidder at $21,449.70; Northern Contracting Co. at
$21,916.50; Phelps-Drake Co., Inc, at $23,142.60, G. L. Contracting, Inc., at
$23,803.50 against Engineer's estimate of $22,989.00.
Improvements BA-136 show&-BEck: Top Sesvkce' $lo: ... lo@ bidder at $34,997.50;
Northwest Bituminous CO., Inc. at $35,329.00; Matt Bullock Contracting Co., IRC;
at $36,170.00, Burry & Carbon, Inc., at $36,783.00 and Hardrives, Inc,, high
bidder at $46,895.50 as against Engineer's Estimate of $35,500.00,
for Street Improvement BA-127 showed Northwest Bituminous Co., Inc., low bidder
at $122,331.75; Riegger Roadways, Inc, at $125,797.50; Black Top Service Co.
at $130,245.00;, C. S. McCrossan, Inc., at $141,405.00 and Hardrives, Inc.,
at $177,882.50 against Engineer's estimate of $139,000.001
motion for award of bid to recommended low bidder in all cases was then seconded
by Councilman Courtney and carried.
Mr.
Tabulation of bids for Sanitary Sewer No.
Tabulatiori for Street
Tabulation
Councilman Shaw's
5027 HALIFAX AVENUE SOLD TO HIGH BIDDER.
bids received in response to Advertisement for Bids for the house at 5923
Halifax Avenue. Tabulation showed bid of Robert Frinkman at $3,100 and the
bid of B. L. Hankerson at' $2,200.
man Johnson's motion awarding sale of the house to high bidder, Robert Frink-
man was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
Mr. Hyde presented tabulation of two
Upon the recommendation of Mr. Hyde Council-
3/3/69
CHAPtSAN-SEVER REGISTERED LAND SURVEY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL. Mr. Hoisington
Chapman-Sever Registered Land Survey for final approval, advising that this
property is located onthe Southwest corner of T.H. 100 and W. 66th Street and
that Planning Commission has recommended approval. Councilman Courtney there-
upon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING
CHAPMAN-SEVER REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Village Council that that certain-Registered Land
Survey, presented for approval by Frances M. Sever covering property located on
the Southwest corner of T.H. 100 and West 66th Street and presented at the Edina
Village Council Meeting of March 3, 1969, be and is hereby granted final
approval. .
Notion for adoption of the resolution was seconded
rollcall there were four ayes and no nays
ncilman Johnson and on
. CREEK VIEW"HE1GHTS ADDITION PRELIMINARY PUT APPROVAL hearing date was set for
March 17, 1969, by motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Courtney
and carried.
GIRL SCOUT TROUP 1002 WELCOMED.
Girl Scout Troup 1002 to the Meeting.
XICHARD WATT BOTICE'OEXOSS REFERRED TO INSURANCE COMPANY AND VILLAGE ATTORNEY.
Mr. Hyde called Council's attention to a notice of loss served on the Village
relative to damage caused by a mud slide at 5909 Amy Drive. .The matter has been
referred to the Village Attorney and to the insurance company.
Mayor Pro Tem VanValkenburg welcomed members of
HEARING DATES FOR PUBLIC INPROVEMENTS SET FOR APRIL 7.
of Mr. Dunn$.A@ril 7, 1969, was set as hearing date for a number of public
improvements .
PARKING RESTRICTIONS CONTINUED TO MARCH 17, 1969.
Hyde, discussion of restriction of parking to one side of the street only for
I?. 54th Street between France Avenue and Wooddale Avenue and for IT. 66th
Street between T.H. 100 and Ridgeview Dr+ve was continued to March 17, 1969 by
motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. Council-
man Shaw's motion that parlcing restrictions also be discussed for France Avenue
between tJ. 49% Street and Id. 51st Street was seconded by Councilman Courtney and
carried.
Upon the-recommendation I Upon the recommendation of l4r.
ABSENTEE VOTER LEGISL4TION REQUESTED. Mr. Hyde advised that the City of Bloom-
ington has asked support for legislation which would establish an "Absent Ballot
Precinct", the purpose of which would be to expedite the count of the Absentee
Ballots received. The Village Clerk recommended that some legislation be ~ taken,
since the number of Absentee Ballots which must be counted after the polls close,
holds up the tabulation of votes, thus defeating bne advantage of voting machines.
Councilman Johnson thereupon offered the following resolution and moved its
adoption :
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Village Council endorse and approve in piinciple
the action of the Council of the City of Bloomington, Biinnesota, in proposing
an "Act 'Relating to Absentee Bhloting, Providing for the'Establishment of an
. Absekee Ballot Precinct, and Provide Local Option for'the Establishment of an
Absentee PrecinCt", or that some other equally effective measure be taken to
insure an early tabulation of the absentee vote; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Senators W. G. Kirchner and Alf Bergerud and Repres-
entatives Otto Bang and Ernest Lindstrom use their good offices to negotiate
passage of such legislation.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was s
rollcall there were four ayes and no nays
c
3/3/69
PROPERTY TAX INCREASE QUESTIONED. Mr. William Reutz, 5820 Eastview Drive,
and Mr. Henning Jensen, 5900 Bernard Place, questioned Council concerning the
substantial increase in their property taxes. Their questions were answered
and Mr. Hyde suggested that property owners make more of an effort to attend
budget meetings of both the Village and of the School Board.
CLAIMS PAID.
carried for payment of the following claims:
truction Fund, $756.00; Park, Park Construction, Swim Pool, Golf Course and
Arena, $1,080.83; Water Fund, $lY523.09;'Liquor Fund, $40,675.17; Sewer Rental
Fund, $60.48; Total, $51,735.38; and for conf2rmation of the following claim:
Motion of Councilman Shaw was seconded by Councilman Courtney and
General Fund, $37,639.81; Cons-
Feb. 26 Poppler Cardarelle, Inc. $300.00 Park
The agenda's business having been covered, Councilman Shawls motion for
adjournment was seconded by Councilman Johnson. Adjournment at 8:55 p.m.
UQ 9-
I Village Clerk