Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19690421_regular, Members answering Mayor Bredesen. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON MONDAY, APRIL 21, 1969 rollcall were Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, VanValkenburg and IIINUTES of April 7, 1969, were approved as submitted by motion of Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. PUBLIC HEARlXGS CONDUCTED ON VARIOUS IMPROVEMENL'S. Nr; Hyde recalled that hear- ings on a number of improvements had been continued from the meeting of April 7, 1969, whereupon hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter recorded: A. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND APPURTENANCES IN THE FOLLOTJING: Valley View Road from Hillside Road to Hansen Road Billside Road from Valley View Road to Tracy Avenue Crescent Drive from Hillside Road to Nestridge Blvd. Crest Lane from Westridge Blvd. to cul-de-sac Westridge Blvd. from Valley View Road to Highland Road Ridgeway Road from Tracy Avenue to Westridge Blvd. Crescent Drive from Westridge Blvd. to Countryside Road Hunter Street from Westridge Blvd. to Crescent Drive Highland Road from Tracy Avenue to Crescent Drive Arbour Lane from Tracy Avenue to Arbour Avenue Ridgeway Road from Tracy Avenue to Westridge Blvd, Westridge Blvd; from Ridgeway Blvd. to Highland Road Highland Road from Westridge Blvd. to Tracy Avenue llr. Hyde advised Council that a petition for watermain had been submitted by residents on Ridgeway Road from Tracy Avenue to Westridge Blvd, on Westridge Blvd. from Ridgeway Blvd. to Highland Road and on Highland Road from Westridge Blvd. to Tracy Avenue; area that does not have Qatermain, it has been felt that this would be an oppor- tune time to ins~a~l~~za~e~smaih~in the entire area. It is further proposed to to construct a new permanent street surfacing with concrete curb and gutter in the entire area. Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction costs as follows. for watermain, permanent street surfacing and concrete curb and gutter: estimated project cost, $376,004.38, proposed to be assessed against 136 lots at an estimated cost of $2,681.23. Six properties which already have Village water would be assessed at an estimated cost of $lO.QO per assessable foot. Estimated cost for watermain only was given at $800 per lot for the petitioned area only and a cost of $725.00 per lot was given as the estimate for street repair only. Mr, Hyde noted that a petition had been presented in opposition to the improve- ment by residents outside of the petitioned area and that sentiment was high in favor of street repair only in the petitioned area, He advised that the staff favors curb and gutter on the basis of more adequate drainage and maintenance. ' . sgQZ.rol. Blr, Frank Uhlemann, 5520 Highland Road, said that he feels the cost of street surfacing with curb and gutter is excessive and unnecessary, but that he would favor watermain and street repair at a cost of $1,500 per lot. Following considerable discussion, Councilman Courtney noted that once a street has been dug up for installation of utilities it is never as good as originally and that the Engineers have recommended what they feel is best for the community and that the .$rfce Iw211 undoubtedly be ' considerably higher when Yeplacement is necessary at a future time. posed, he moved that watermain be installed in the petitioned area only and that the streets be repaired rather than replaced with curb and gutter as recommended. Motion was seconded 'by Councilman Johnson who also emphasized that the street would not be as good with a repair job as with a new surfacing. {See Resolution Ordering Improvement'later in Minutes.) B. Since these streets'are a portion of a much larger Total In view of the strong opposition to the improvement as pro- qotion carried. CONSTRUCTION OF IIATEREIAIN AND APPURTENANCES, PERElANENT STREET SURFACING ANI) CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING: Interlachen Circle from Interlachen Road to Interlachen Road Mr. Hyde presented estimated cost for permanent street surfacing and concrete curb and gutter at $18,450.70 and for watermain at $9,011.94 with total esti- mated project cost at $27,462.64. Water, permanent street. surfacing and con- crete curb and gutter were proposed to be assessed against 15 assessable lots at $600.00 for watermain and $1,025.04 for permanent street surfacing and con- crete curb and gutter. Three lots already served by watermain are proposed to be assessed for permanent street surfacihg and concrete curb and gutter at a rate of $1,025.04 per assessable lot. Mr. Hyde advised that a petition has been received for watermain only. Dr. Nillis El. Duryea, 5641 Interlachen Circle, and Mr. Daniel Runke, 5637 Interlachen Circle spoke in favor of the improvements as proposed. Messrs. I?. H. Beall, C. I,. Stone and Alden Sheffield spoke in .opposi- tion to the proposed tixskalla&ton.of:obncrete curb and gutter, stating that they I 13 (a do not want to sacrifice the rustic appearance of Interlachen Circle and asserted that the Village has spent very little on street.maintenance. Council inspect the street-which was installed ten years ago to see the excel- lent condition it is in at the present time. Dr. M. I. Hewitt and Mr. M. R, Guberud advised that they did not care particularly whether or not curbing is installed but urged installation of watermain. Mr. Dunn noted that he feels that curb and gutter are important especially for very flat streets or streets with steep grades and that there is a ”grey area” in between. out that lawnsin the area are torn up.each winter by snow plows. Johnson moved, following considerable discussion, that the improvement be authorized as recommended, there being good and sufficient reasons for installa- tion of curb and gutter with the street surfacing. Motion was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried carried, (See Resolution Ordering Improve- ment later in Minutes.) Mayor Brcdesen noted that he had mted t’aye’’with con- ~ideE~~T~”~~T~era~~e~~~~~a~~~~h~~~~~~1~~~ SiaC. s&re‘efS -%TEhout curb and gutter are more aesthetically pleasing, but tbat he is reasonably convinced that street maintenance will be less because of the curb and gutter. C. Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at $37,592.49, proposed to be assessed against an estimated assessable footage of 41198.83 feet at an estimated cost of $7. 3 per assessable foot and advised that a petition had Courtney’s motion authorizing the improvement was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. D. They suggested that It was pointed Councilman CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN Arctic Way been received for the improvement. s No objections being heard, Councilman (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING : Crescent Drive from Benton Avenue to the North line of Lot 1, Block 2, Edina Countryside extended Mr. Hyde advised that a petition has been received for this improvement and presented total estimated project cost at $5,858.06, proposed to be assessed against an estimated 504.33 assessable feet at an estimated cost of $11.62 per assessable foot. No objections were heard from the audience. Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) E. (See CORSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THET FOLZWING : VETgInia Avenue from West 60th Street to Valley View Road Mr. Hyde presented total estimated construction cost at $11,878.06 for perman- ent street surfacing and concrete curb and gutter, proposed to be assessed at an estimated cost of $16476 per assessable foot. surfacing without curb and gutter was given at $7,862.86, estimatcid.oost of uhich wOu1P be=$ll.lQ:per assessable foot. Mr. Hyde noted that a petition for street surfacing without curb and gutter had been submitted and that a letter signed by liessrs. K. J. Sundquist and R. S.’MacDonald of W, 60th Street urging the improvement as proposed because they believe that the present condition of this street is a deterioration factor for the rest of the neighborhood and also causes a dust problem. Nr. Frank Roth, 6005 Virginia, as advised that the Village will take care of damage done to driveways and lawns when the street is installed but that no major lawn repairs will be done. noted that if the improvement is installed without curb and gutter, yards would be blended to street level. In reply to a question from the audience, Mr. Dunn presented.specifications for the type of construction to be wed, Nr. Roth pointed out that the area has good drainage and that there is no reason for curb and gutter. Mr. Warren Jones, 6009 Virginia Avenue, advised that he had circulated the petition and that he felt that residents would rather have the street repaired than to have curb and gutter installed. discussion, Councilman VanValkenburg‘s motion authorizing improvement without curb and gutter was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Councilman Johnson voted “nay’l, stating that he felt that curb and gutter should be installed; however, the motion cazried inasmuch as the improvement had been petitioned and only a favorable 3/5 vote was needed to carry. (See Resolution Ordering Petition later in Minutes .) F. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET,SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN Virginia Avenue from West 62nd Street b Crosstown Highway (County Road 62) Mr. Hyde presented total estimated project cost at $20,118.24, proposed to be assessed against 1,471.40 assessable feet at a cost.of $13.67 per estimqted assessable foot. requesting the improvement which was signed by eight property owners and that a petition signed-by eight property owners opposing the -improvement had been received on April 7, 1969. Mr. K. I?. Bremer, 6209 Virginia Avenue and Mr. Donald C. McDonald, 6217 Virginia Avenue, advised that they had signed both petitions but that they now want to urge that the improvement be installed as proposed. Mr. Bremer added that the need for curb and gutter has been demon- strated since the street was torn up for sewer connections on the east side of 1- Total cost of permanent street Mayor Bredesen Following considerable I He advised that a petition had been submitted in June, 1968, the street. tested installation of the improvement, ctiai-ging that there is very little traffic on.the street and that taxes are already so high that the Village already receives 65% of the rental income on his property. Mr. Harold Lunde, 6225 Virginia Avenue, took issue with Mr. Mathews, stating that there is considerable traffic on this street since it is the first thru street: to the Service Road. He said that the street is muddy when it rains and very dusty when the weather is dry. asked if the hill near G2nd Street could be graded to a safer level and ~7as advised by Mr. Dunn that some adjustment could be made. authorizing the improvement as proposed was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. G. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN Chowen Avenue from West 60th Street to West 61st Street Mr. Hyde presented total estimated project cost at $9;780.09, proposed to be assessed against 747.04 estimated-assessable feet at an estimated cost of $13.09 per assessable foot. He noted that Mr. and Mrs. Keith Carlson, 6021 Chowen Ave. had called attention to the fact that this strip of Chowen has never been sur- faced and is the only stretch without permanent surfacing in1-the area. A letter signed by ufmers of nine properties in the 6000 block of Chowen avenue was pre- sented in opposition to the project. Mayor Bredesen pointed out that it is not fair that this section of street should be maintained from general funds of the Village. An unidentified lady replied that five or six years ago a charge for maintenance was placed on taxes, but she was told be Mr. Hyde that this charge was for oi:ing only. the difference in seal coating and permanent street surfacing. Mayor Bredesen suggested the possibility of billing property owners for street maintenance if the improvement is not authorized, but warned that this would probably be more expensive in the long run. He warned further that the longer permanent street surfacing is postponed, the higher the cost would be apt to be. Discussion en- sued as to the type of street surfacing on nearby streets and it was noted that there is no consistency in the area. Sather, 6017 Chowen Avenue, Mr. Hyde reiterated that this block of Chowen Avenue has never been assessed for anything approaching a standard surfaced street. Sather replied to a question of Councilman Johnson that she would still oppose construction of street improvement even without curb and gutter. considerable discussion, Councilman VanValkenburg's motion that the project be tabled with the understanding that there will be no further maintenance of the street except for snow removal unless.there is a petition and a hearing result- ing from that petition. Motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement 'later in Minutes .) H. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AM, C0NCRETE.CURB AND GUTTER IN Mr. Hyde presented total estimated project cost at $124,125.18, $98,511.08 of which is proposed to be paid from State Aid Funds with $32,608.10 proposed to be assessed against 3260.81 estimated assessable feet at an estimated cost of $10.00 per assessable foot. 1964 and 1968 but that the project is being initiated by the Village for a 36 foot width street with parking restricted to one side of the street only. Hyde pointed out that State Aid Funds would be used to pay for anything over 30 feet. A letter signed by the Misses Margaret and Mary Riley, 5028 Benton Avenue, was presented in which objection was made to the Benton Avenue Overpass and to the 44 foot width Proposed for Benton Avenue between Josephine and Ting- dale Avenues. the proposed width of the street, the removal afid possible injury to trees and requesting formal agreements sdative to landscaping plans and easements .was read by Mr. Robert Peterson, 5325 Benton Avenue. Mr. Hyde suggested that resi- dents look at retaining walls along 'I?. 60th Street between Xerxes and France Avenues since this street is similar to the Benton Avenue proposal. to a statement of Mrs. Peterson that the charm of the street will be destroyed, ?.fayor Bredesen pointed out that Council attempts to preserve the beauty of the community but that as the population increases certain problems arise which must be solved for the good of the community as avhole. Messrs. L. D. Jepson, R. A. Edstrom, P. J. Dulin all protested the width of the proposed street. Mr. Dunn advised that the.40 foot width between Josephine and Tingdale is necessary because of the traffic flow from T.H. 100. Nayor Bredesen,took issue with Miss Na-ry Riley who said that the Village was "arbitrary" in its pro$oSal to widen Benton Avenue. He explained to her and to Mr. N. A. Engh, 5820 Dale Avenue, that Benton Avenue had been was the logical FBokce for a %ollector'' street since Valley View Road is too close to the Crosstown.Highway. that a 30 foot street could be constructed if parking was prohibited on both sides of the street but that this would cause inconvenience to residents as well lk. Fred lfathews, owner of property at 6208 Virginia Avenue, pro- He also Councilman Johnson's motion I (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) Mr. Hyde explained to Mr. John McClellan, 6004 Chowen Ave., In reply to a question of Mrs. Roker'G. Mrs. I Following Benton Avenue from Josephine Avenue to Hansen Road He noted that petitions had been submitted in 1963, Mr. A statement conceding to the project in principle, but protesting In reply Mr. Hyde noted 4/21/69 as tend to speed up traffic. Mr. F. A. Matthews, 5201 Benton, sa-3 that he is a long time resident who opposed the Benton Avenue interchange at the time it was originally considered. He indicated that he and his neighbors would gladly pay the entire cost of the street if it could be constructed at a 30 foot width, however, Mr. John E. Sampsell-, 5208 Benton contridixted Mr. Platthews saying that he and his neighbors would not be willing to pay the difference in cost. between the two widths. Mr. 'Robert J. Hoehn, 5105 Benton Avenue, said that Benton Avenue had always been a boor street and urged that a street be con- structed which would stand up under the heavy traffic. The owner of Lot 1, Block 2, Edina Ridge, was advised that he would be assessed for 65.74 feet. Discussion ensued as to plans for the improvement of T.H. 100 and resultant traffic p-attern-projections. Following considerable discussion, Councilman Johnson's motion approving the improvement as proposed in view of the fact that a 30 foot street with parking restrictions on both sides would encourage speed- ing and be prohibitive in cost was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. (See Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes.) I. CONSTRUCTION OF ALLEY SURFACING IN THE FOLLO17ING: North-South Alley between York Avenue and Xerxes Avenue from West 56th' East-Vest Alley between Yorlc Avenue and the North-South Alley between York Mr. Hyde presented total estimated project cost at $9,133.54 for Portland cement concrete alley, less $2,283.38 (25%) to be paid from General Funds. estimated cost to be assessed was given at $6,850.16 proposed to be assessed against 861.02 assessable feet at- an estimated cost of $7.96 per assessable foot or against 16 lots at $B28.14 per assessable lot. A petitfon signed by owners of nine properties had been submitted. audience indicated that he favored the improvement but did not think that con- crete surfacing was necessary inasmuch as this alley is used for local traffic only and other alleys in the Village ham a bituminous surface. Kiedrow'ski, 5609 York Avenue complained about the increase in his taxes and noted that this is an unnecessary additional expense. It was pointed out that the petition would not have been submitted if they had known that the concrete surface would be proposed. $75.00 to $90.00 difference in' cost over the period of the assessment and that there is a considerable saving in cost; of maintenance in the two types of alleys. Following some discussion, Councilman Courtney advised that he would . recommend installation of the alley surfacing as proposed in view of the recent policy of the Village to install only Portland cement concrete alleys. thereupon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Street to West 57th Street Avenue and Xerxes Avenue Total An unidentified gentleman in the Mr. P. J. Mayor Breaesen noted that there 3s only between He RESOLUTION ORDERING WATERMAIN IIkROVEMENTS 244 AND 243, STREET IMPROVENENTS BA- 139 , BA- 143, BA- 141 , BA- 142 AND BA- 146 AND ALLEY SURFACING NO. E-25 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvements: 1. ' CONSTRUCTION OF TJATERllAIN , -'J?ERHANERT ,STREET SURFACING AN, CONCRETE CURB AM, GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING: Valley View Road from Hillside Road to Hansen Road Hillside Road from Valley View Road to Tracy Avenue Crescent Drive from Hillside Road to Westridge Blvd. Crest Lane from WesQridge Blvd. to cul-de-sac Ridgeway Road from Tracy Avenue to Vestridge Blvd. Crescent Drive from Hestridge Blvd? ta Countryside Road Hunter Street from Westridge Blvd. to Crescent Drive Highland Road from Tracy Avenue to Crescent Drive Arbour Lsne from Tracy Avenue to Arbour Avenue Ridgeway BQad from Tracy Avenue to Westridge Blvd. Westridge Blvd. from Ridgeway Blvd. to Highland Road Highland Road from Westridge Blvd. to Tracy Avenue CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN, PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE EOLLOI?ING: -. Interlachen Circle from Interlachen Eoad to Interlachen Road 3. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOVING : .. Arctic Way CONSTRUCTION OF PEREIANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN THE FOLLOWING: - - Crescent Drive from Benton Avenue to the North line of Lot 1, Block 2, Edina Countryside extended CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN ~ ' %Jestridge Blvd. from Valley View Road to Highland Road 2. 4. 5. .THE FOLLOWING : J 4/21/69 Virginia Avenue from West 60th Street to Valley View Road THE FOLLWING : Virginia Avenue from Vest G2nd Street to Crosstown Highway THE FOUOKCNG : .Benton Avenue from Josephine Avenue to Hansen Road' 8. CONSTRUCTION OF PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE ALLEY PAVING IN THE FOLLOTJING: North-South Alley between Yorlc Avenue and Xerxes Avenue and between West East-West Alley between York Avenue and the North-South Alley between Yorlc 6. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN 7. CONSTRUCTION OF PERWENT STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IN I 56th Street and West 57th Street Avenue and Xerxes Avenue and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent: facts does hereby determine to proceed with the con- struction of said improvements except that for Natermain 244 watermain will be installed only in the petitioned area which is as follows: Ridgeway Road from Road and Highland Road from Westridge Blvd. to Tracy Avenue with street repair only; and Street Improvement No. BA-141 will be installed without curb and gutter, including all proc eedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the ac- quisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvements; that said improvements are hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings .as follows: . Tracy Avenue to Nestridge Blvd., Westridge Blvd. from Ridgeway Blvd. to Highland No. 1 Above 1UTERMAIN NO. 244 No. 2 Above 'NATEFWIN NO. 243 No. 3 Above STREET IMPROVEHENT BA-139 No. 4 Above STREET IIPROVE$IENT BA- 143 No. 5 Above STREET IMI?ROVEMENT BA- 141 No. G Above STREET DPROVEEIENT BA- 142 No. 7 Above . STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-146 No. 8 Above ALLEY IMPROVEMENT E-25 and the area specially assessed therefore for Waterm.ain 244 shall Znclude Lots 1 thru 9, Block.4, Lots 2 thru 13, Block 5, Lot 5, Block 6, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 7 and Lots 1 thru 4, Block 8, Countryside Addition; the area specially assessed therefore for Watermain 243 shall include Lots 2 thru 8, Block 1, Lots 2, 3 and 4, Block 2, and Lots 1 thru 5, Block 3, Victorsen's East $Error Lakes for aatepain, permanent street surfacing and concrete curb and gutter and the area proposed to be assessed for permanent street surfacing and concrete curb and gutter only shall include Lot: 1, Block 1, and Lots 1 and 5, Block 2; Victorsen's East Mirror Lakes; the area proposed to be assessed for the cost of Street Improve- ment BA-139 includes Lots 1 thru 4*incl., Block 1, Lots 1 thru 12, incl., Block 2, Lots 1 thru 8 incl., Block 3, Outlot B and Outlot C all in Viking Hills 2nd Addition; the area proposed to be asspsed for Street Improvement BA-143 includes Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 1, Edina Countryside, Lot 49, Warden Acres and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Warden Acres Lot 49 Replat; the area proposed to be assessed for Street Improvement BA-141 includes Lots 3 thru 7 incl., Block 1, Lot 1 and Lots 10 thru 13 incl., Block 2, all in Virginia Avenue Addition; the area pro- posed to be assessed for Street Improvement BA-142 shall include Lots 1 thru 5 incl., and vacated street, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 5 incl., Block 2, Normandale Addition, Lot 1, Replat of Block 9, Normandale, Lots 11 and 12, Replat of Block 10, Normandale, and Lots 1 and 2, Normanda1.e Haverly Replat; the area proposed to be assessed for Street Improvement BA-146 includes Lot 4, Block 1, and Lots 1 2 and 3, Block 2, Edina Ridge, Lot 1, Block 1, Sagar Square, Lots 1 and 4, Donna Ridge Addition, Lots 7 thru 12 incl., Block 2, Edina Heights, Lots 1 thru 6 incl., Block 1, Benton Park, Lots 7, 18 and 19, Block 1, Lots 6 and 7, Block 2, Lots 6 and 7, Bloc$ 3, Lot 1, Block 4,^Codes Highview Park; Lots l'and 2, Block 1, Hayden Addition, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Codes Highview Park Hawthorne Replat, Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Replat of Lot.6 and the South half of Lot 5, Block 1, Codes Highview Park; the area proposed to be assessed for Alley Improvement E-25 includes Lots 1 thru 12 incl., Block 1, Harriet Lawn Addition and Lots 1 thru 4 incl., Block 1, Brookli Hotion for adoption of the resolut,ion was and on rollcall there were four ayes and I; . I ATTEST : Mayor fl, Village Clerk 0 L - 4/21/69 i ORDINANCE NO. 261- 181 ADOPTED AT- SECOND READING. Ordinance No. 261-181for Second Reading which provides for zoning change from R-1 Residential District io Automobile Parking District for 4429 Valley View Road, which Reading had been continued from April 7. No objections being heard from the audience, Councilman Johnson osfered Ordinance No. 261-181 for Second Reading and moved itsladoption as follows: Mr . @de :presenpd.- ORDINANCE NO. 261-181 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL AUTOMOBILE I PARKING DISTRICT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph 1, Boundaries of Automobile Parking District, of Section 5, (Automobile Parking District) of Ordinance 261 of revised Ordinances of the Village of Edina, is hereby amended by adding the following subparagraph : Automobile Parking District: (m) The North 40 feet of the West 100 feet of Parcel 1218, except the blest 30 feet in Section 30, Township 28, Range 24. Saction 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. and on rollcall there were Motion for adoption of the ATTEST : Village Clerk 4 ORDINANCE NO. 26 1- 182 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. Ordinance No. 261-182 for Second Reading,asL,i50ntinued from meeting of April 7, 1969. This ordinance provides for zoning change for the westedy 299.86 feet of the Pearce property on N. 66th Street and Xerxes Avenue as requested by Eberhardt Company. No objections being heard from the audience, Councilman VanValkenburg offered Ordinance No. 261-182 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows : Mr . &?de '.p.gesenFed ORDINANCE NO. 261-182 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL OFFICE Section 1. Paragraph 1, Office Building District Boundaries, of Section 8 (Office Building District) of ordinance 261 of revised ordinances of the Village of Edina, is hereby amended by adding the following subparagraph: (ZONING OBDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA .- BUILDING DISTRICT 0- 1 -~ District 0- 1: (ff) The l?est 229.86 feet of Lot 5, Cassin's Outlots, lying North of York Avenue and South of Cassin's Replat. Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its .passage and publication. Motion fcjr adoption of the ordinance was se on'rollcall there were four ayes and ATTEST: Mayor '4 Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 261-183 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. Mr. Hyde presented Ordinancd No. 261-183 for Second Reading as continued from April 7, 1969. This ordinance would allow Handball Courts in Office Building District 0-1 and in the Planned Industrial District. No objections being heard from the audience, Councilman Johnson offered Ordinance No. 261-183 for' Second Reading and move4 its adoption as follows : ORDINANCE NO. 261-183 AN OmINANCE ADDING HANDBALL COURTS TO THE LIST OF PERMITTED USES IN THE OFFICE BUILDING DISTRICT AND PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRECT : AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. 8 (Office Building District) of Ordinance 261 of the Village is hereby amended to read as follows: Subparagraph (a) (Principal Uses) of paragraph 2 of Section i . 4/21/69 J "(a) Principal Uses, Buildings suitably designed may be erected, maintained and used within the Office Building District for the following purposes : (1) Offices, business and professional. (2) Financial Institutions. (4) (5) Handball Courts. I* (3) Post Offices. Private club or lodge except those providing food and/or bever- age service.to their members on a regular basis. Section 2,. Subparagraph (3) (Number of Spaces Required) (e) (Off-street Parking) of paragraph 3 of Section 8 of said ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: "(3) Number of Spaces Required Offices: Medical and Dental Offices: Private Club or Lodge: 1 space for each 200 square feet of floor area. 6 spaces for each doctor or dentist- 1 space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area devoted to office use or 1 space for each 3 seats in the largest place of assembly, whichever is greater. Accessory Uses: Handball Courts: Section 3. 8 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of floor area. 6 off-street parking spaces for each handball court," Subparagraph (a) (Principal Uses) of Paragraph 3 of Section 10 (Planned Industrial District) of Ordinance No. 261 of the Village is hereby amended by adding to the list of permitted uses, the following: (5) Handball Courts, Section 4. Subparagraph (d) (Off-street Parking) of Paragraph ti of Section 10 of said ordinance is hereby amended by adding subparagraph (5) (Handball Courts) as follows : (5) Handball Courts. Six (6) off-street parking spaces for each hand- Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seco on rollcall there were four ayes and no na ATTEST : ball court. '' y Councilman VanValkenburg and l!&LuzLB+h Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 261-180 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. Mr. Hyde presented Ordinance No, 2yl-180 which provides for a Planned,.Residential District for Second Reading. No objections being heard from the audience, Councilman Johnson offered Ordinance No. 261-180 for Second Reading, stipulating a drafting change in regard to open space requirements, as follows : ORDINANCE NO. 261-180 AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND REGULATING USES THEREIN: AMENDING, THE ZONING ORDINANCE THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILTAGE OF EDINA, NINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Village is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 2. DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED Section 1. Section 2 of the Ordinance No. 261 (Zoning Ordinance} of the For the purposes of this ordinance, the Village shall be' divided into the following districts, and the uses of structures and lands, the height of buildings and the area of premises for buildings are to be uniform in each district: Single Family Dwelling District (Section 3) Mu1 t ip le Residence District (Sect ion 4) Planned Residential District (Section 5) Automobile Parking District (Section 6) Regional Medical pistrict (Section 7) Office Building .District (Section 8) , Commercial District (Section 9) Planned Industrial District (Section 10) The boundaries of said districts shall be.as further provide1 .- hered. No building shall be erected or premises used for any purpose unless in compliance with the use, height, area and other regulations and restrictions prescribed for the district in which such building or premises are lbcated.'' 261 is hereby renumbered Section 6. Sec. 2. Section 5 (Automobile Parking District) of said Ordinance No. Sec. 3. There is hereby created a new Section 5 of said ordinance reading . as follows: I . . 4/21/69 b=i "Section 5 "P,JA"ED PaSIDENTIAL DISTRICT "1. Purpose. The planned development concept is rapidly emerging as a means for encouraging creativity, imagination, variation and flexibility in the development of residential areas. ing of housing in an effort to presewepand protect natural amenities, to provide large expanses of usable open space, to reduce development costs and yet to maintain single family densitiesjwithin the overall Planned Residential District. Its purpose is to create a new high-quality, low-density residential environment having a mixture of housihg types in a functional and natural setting . ing any petitione or applications for Planned Residential District zoning: in conjunction with residential developments. approach in the development of residential areas.. topography, stands of trees, ponds, flood plains and similar n'atural assets, mixture of housing types. not possible under current regulations. Before a petition or application for Planned Residential District zoning may Its basic characteristic is the cluster- 2. Obiectives. The following objectives shall be considered in revicw- (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) 3. Requirements for the Establishment of Planned Residential Districts. To encourage the provision of open space and recreational facilities To encourage developers to use a more creative and imaginative 'To..provide an enjoyable living environment by preserving existing To encourage a variety of living environments and an agreeable To permit a.degree of flexibility in environmental design which is be acted upon, the following conditions must be met: (a) The planned development site shall be not less than ten acres in area, shall be under the control of'.one owner or group of owners, and shall be capable of being planned and.developed as one integral unit. number of acres therein multiplied by four. shall be set aside or dedicated as provided in paragraph 7 of Section 5 of this Ordinance. 4. Boundaries of Planned Residential District. The boundaries of the Planned Residential District 'shall include the lands rezoned by the Village Council as provided in paragraph 8 of Section 5 of this Ordinance. (b) (c) The number of dwelling units within the site shall not exceed the A minimum of 2,000 square feet of open space per dwelling unit 5. Specific Uses Permitted in PlannCd Residential District. (a) (b) Two-family dwellings. (c) Townhouses, apartments and other similar housing types. (d) Recreational facilities as permitted in paragraph 2 of Section 3 of All of the Principal Uses permitted in the Single Family Dwelling District and accessory garages and parking facilities. this ordinance. Recreational facilities may also include swimming pools. The use of recreational facilities may be restricted io use by the owners or occupants of the lots located within the site and their guests. 6. Yard and Site Requirements. (a) Maximum height of structures: Two stories for single and two (b) EJinimum number of parking spaces required: family dwellings and three stories for all other structures. (1) All residential dwelling units: 2 enclosed spaces per dwelling (2) unit Other permitted uses: 1 as provided in ParagrapL 5 of Section 3 of this ordinance. (c) Setbacks from streets designated'bjthe Planning Department as collectors , arterials , expressways or freeways and from Planned Residential District boundaries shall be required in accordance with paragraph 4 of Section 3 of this ordinance. Setbacks from collectors, arterials, expressways or freeways and Planned Residential District boundaries ]for townhouses or apart- ments shall be 35 feet or the height of the building, whichever is great.er. ' &. op en Space Requirements. Open space, tree: cover, recreational area, scenic vista and other authorized open space shall be either set aside as common land for the sole benefit., use and enjoyment of present and future lot or home owners within the development ,and their guests,, or shall be dedicated to the Village as park land for the use of '&he general public. Commission shall determine which o'f these options is more appropriate and shall recommend to the Viliage'Council one of the following procedures: to a home owner's association or other similar nonprofit organization so that fee simple title shall be vested in such organization, provided that Suitable arrangements have been made for'maintenance of said land and any buildings thereon, and provided further, that an open space easement for said land shall be conveyed to the Village to assure that open space land shall remain open, or The Planning (a) The open space land shall be conveyed by the tract owner or owners 4/21/69 (b) The open space land shall be dedicated to the general public for park or recreational purposes by the tract owner or owners. is determined to be in the best interest of the Village, the owner shall not be compelled to improve the natural condition of said open space lands. Development. to Planned Residential District shall be filed as provided in Paragraph 7 of Section 15 of this ordinance, upon forms made available for that purpose, by the owner or owners of the entire land area to be so zoned. drawings, drawn to scale, showing the following information: Where this option 8, (a) Procedure for Planned Residentkal Distriet Zoning and Subsequent -- Application. A petition or application -for rezoning from any district I (b) Data Required. Every application shall be accompanied by maps and (1) Existing topography, existing tree cover, water bodies and other natural amenities; the location of existing streets and buildings; surrounding land use; and any other pertinent informa- tion felt to be necessary to the evaluation of the proposal; and the location of proposed structures and streets, common open areas, proposed final grades and all dimensions. (c) Review. Within 45 days, the Planning Department shall review the (2) Preliminary site plans for the proposed development showing application and submit it to the Village Planning Commission. The afisllcation shall thereafter be acted upon in accordance with paragraph 7 of Section 15 of this ordinance, except as herein otherwise provided. The Village Council shall conduct a public hearing and shall grant preliminary approval or disapproval of the rezoning. liminary approval is granted, the owners or developers of the property may prepare an overall development plan for final approval by the Planning Commis- sion and Council. mitted to the Planning Commissiod and shall include the following: (d) Council Action. If pre- (e) Overall Development Plan. An Overall Development Plan shall be sub- A detailed site plan showing all proposed streets, structures, parking areas, utility easements, common open areas, recrea- tied facilities, and a landscape schedule. A boundary survey and legal description of the entire tract covered by the application, prepared by a registered land surveyor. A preliminary layout of all proposed watermains, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage facilities together with profiles for all street roadways. A general overall grading plan indicating final grades and direction and destination of surface drainage. Elevation drawings .of all proposed structures ascept detached single family dwellings. . Copies of all proposed protective covenants, agreements and provisions which govern the.use and maintenance of common open areas. The owner's or developer's contemplated development schedule. I (f) Final. Approval. The Planning Commission shall report favorably upon the Overall Development Plan only upon finding that: (1)' The proposed development will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the Planned Residential District.. (2) sive development plan for the Village. (3) The overall design fully accommodates and preserves the natural amenities of the Planned Residential District area. (4) The proposed development provides a proper relationship and qkality between natural features, common open space, and living space. The proposed development is consistent with the comprehen- The Council may accept or deny the findings of the Planning Commission and thereby approve or disapprove the Overall Development Plan. the rezoning shall be granted final approval. U If the Overall Development Plan is approved, (g) (hl Filing. Revisions and/or Changes in the Overall Development Plan. The approved Overall Dkvelopment Plan shall be filed in the Planning Department, . (I) Minor changes in the location and placement of buildings may be seen circumstances such as engineering requirements dictate such change. Changes in structural types, in the shape and arrangement of lots and blocks, in the allocation of open space, and all other changes which affect the overall design of the project authorized by the ViIlage Planning Department where unfor- (2) 87 4/21/69 i. shall be referred to the Planning Commission. for report and recommendation,. after which the Village Council shall hold a public hearing and shall deckde to either approve or deny the changes in the Overall Development Plan. are authorized, the owners or developers shall submit a revised plan showing the authorized changes,. If such changes Sec. 4. Section 11 (Definitions) of said Ordinance No. 261 is hereby . * 'Townhouse' - a one-family dwelling unit attached to other such units by common walls side by side. Sec. 5. This Ordinance shall. be in full force and effect immediately amended by aqding thereto the follbwing additional definition: upon its passage and publication, Motion for adoption of the ordinance was se and on rollcall there were four ayes and ATTEST : Village Clerk' u, PORTION OF TJ. 65TH STREET VACATED. Clerk, approved as to form and. ordered placed on file. Mr. Hyde advised Council that a petition had been received for the vacation of this portion of W. 65th Street lying between Ryan Avenue and Pamell Avenue and that vacation is recommended in view of the ten percent grade. thereupon offered the following resolution and moyed its adoption, no object- ions being heard from the audience: Affidavits of Notice were presented by Councilman Courtney RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF WEST 65TH STREET 8 WHEREAS, two weeks' published, posted and mailed notice of a hearing to be held on ApTil 21,. 1969, at 7:OO p:m. on the proposed street vacation hereinafter 'described has been given and made and a hearing has been held thereon by the Village Council: WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, thac the following described portion of West 65th Street, all as platted and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, be and is hereby vacated effective May 21, 1969, unless on or before said date this resolution is amended, annulled or rescinded by the Village Council: - West 65th Street between Ryan and Parnel Avenues except the utility easement described as follows : A 30 foot strip of land lying 15 feet North and South of the center line of West 65th Street as platted and lying between the Southerly extension.of the East line of Lot 5;. Block 13, Normandale Addition, and the Southerly exten- sion of the Vest line Motion for adoption of the resolution was sec on rollcall there were four ayes and no n ATTEST : by Councilman Johnson and Village Clerk VILLAGE HALL AIR CONDITIONING BID AWARDEE). presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr, Hyde presented tabulation of four bids showing Thomas Air Conditioning Company low bidder at $7,465.00, Yale, Inc., three bids at $8,364.00, $8,139.00 and $8,089.00, Refrigeration Guarantee at $11,190.00 and Thompson Air Condition- . ing Company at $12,847.00. Councilman Johnson's motion for award to recommended low bidder, Thomas Air Conditioning Co. for replacement of the existing system, was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. Affidavits of Publication were MOWER BID &IAW CONTINUED.-' BIT. Hydc advised that only one bid had been received in response to Advertisement for Bids in the Edina Sun on April 3, 1969, and that bid had been higher than estimated. ing award, to May 5, 1969, as-recommended by the Village Manager was seconded by Councilman. Courtney and carried. Councilman Johnson's motion continu- DOG ORDINANCE AMENDNENT TAKEN UNDER C'ONSIDERATION, received from Mr. A. Clarence Sheedy, 4387 Broolf Avenue, suggesting a reduction in the length of time puppies can be kept in a residential area. Councilman Courtney's motion that the request be teken under consideration was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. Mr. Hyde noted a letter I it . 4/21/69 PETITIONS RECEIVED. Upon the motion of Councilman VanValkenburg, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried, the following petitions were received and ordered referred to the Engineering-Department for processing : Storn Sewer - Valley View Road between the Nest line Sanitary Sewer - To. serve 6610, 6620, 6630 and 6712 Normandale Road Permanent Street Surfacing, Concrete Curb and Gutter - Biscayne Blvd., of Iroquois Hills 4th Addition to the ditch near the South line Newport Drive, Londonderry Road LAKE EDINA IMPRQVEHENT REQUESTED. improvement of Lake Edina by deepening, possible construction of island or islands and improvement of the West bank by filling. Mr. Robert Rischmiller, 4940 Poppy Lane, noted that neighbors in the area had met with llr. Dunn and Mr. Rosland and had pointed out that the lake is filling in from silt which is coming in from storm waters. of weed control, that if the project is approved, the cost could be added to the overall cost. Nayor Bredesen pointed out that if there had been no storm water drainage, there would be no Lake Edina. In reply to Mr. Rischmiller's contention that lots abutting Lake Edina provide more taxes than lots which are not on lake frontage, Mayor Bredesen noted that if the lake was not there, the houses which would- occupy that property would bring in substantially more taxes, cussion, Councilman Johnson's motion that the cost of the feasibility study be explored was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. Mr. Hyde noted a petition received for the It was pointed out that the Park Department is involved because He requested that-the Village finance a feasibility study and Following some dis- MINNEHAHA BLVI), CLOSING-AT 17. 54TH STREET REFERRED TO TRAFFIC COHIlITTEE. Nr. Hyde presented a petition signed by ohers of nine properties on Ninnehaha Blvd. for the closing of Minnehaha Blvd. at FJ. 54th Street in view of the proposal to close Halif'k Avenue just south of 'IJ. 50th Street. Hrs. Ralph H. Larson, 5313 Minnehaha Blvd., advised that there is concern about speeding and general traffic patterns and that there is substantial danger to children in the area, Bredesen noted that this pet5tfon fs &:fbadvi.Seld khasmuch as*.the.park Tna-trhe area is for the use of all residents in the Village. requested that this matter be considered at the time of the Halifax Avenue street closing is considered. that the matter be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. HYDE PARK GRANTED FINAL PLAT APPROVAL SUBJECT TO SIGNIhY; OF DEVEWPER'S AGREE- 3BNT AND APPROVAL OF FINAL GRADES. Mr. Hyde presented Hyde Park for final plat approval as recommended by the Planning Commission. Developer's Agreement had not yet been signed and that final grade approval had not been granted, Councilman Johnson offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Mayor Nrs. W. H. Hauck, 5029 Indianola, Following some discussion, Councilman Johnson's motion It being noted-that the RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF HYDE PARK BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Hyde-Parlc" platted by Vernon L. Norgren, single owner and by W, E. Johnston and Bernardine C. Johnston, husband and wife, and presented at Notion for adoption of the resolution wa I DIVISION OF LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 4, GOLF TERRACE HEIGHTS SECOND ADDITION APPROVED, Nr. Hyde advised that Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Golf Terrace Heights Second Addition had been divided but that a resolution is,required so that this property can be legally conveyed, whereupon Councilman VanValkenburg offered the folloving reso- lution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION VHEREAS, Joyce Voight Lynn is the owner of a certain parcel of land in the Village of Edina described as follows: Lot 1 and the East 33 feet of Lot 2, Block 4, Golf Terrace Heights Second Addition, except that part of Lot 2 described as follows, to wit: Commencing at a point in the North line of said Lot 2, which point is 34 feet easterly of the Northwesterly corner of said Lot 2 measured along the Northerly line of said Lot 2; thence Easterly 9 feet &ring the Northerly line of said Lot 2; Thence Southwesterly in a straight line to a point in the.Souther1y line of said Lot 2, which 4/21/69 i 89 point is 34 feet Easterly from the Southwest corner of said Lot 2; thence Northerly on a straight line- to the point of beginning, Hennepin County, Ninne- sota, including that vacated portion of -Lexington Avenue adjoining said tract as dedicated in the plat of Golf Terrace-Heights Second Addition; and WHEREAS, said owner has requested.approva1 of the Village-of Edina of the con- veyance and ownership of the above described land as & separate parcel; and C.JHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the Village of =Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the purpose of the' Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A; NOT%, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tract of land as a separate parcel is hereby -approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and conveyance, subject, however, to the'provision that no further subdivision be made of the above described tract of land unless made in compliance with the pertinent ofdinances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was on rollcall there were four ayes and no n WEST 69% STREET VACATION CONTINUED NINETY DAYS. Upon being advised by Mr. Hyde that there have been no new developments relative to the vacation of FI. 69% Street which had been continued from January 20, 1969, Councilman Johnson's motion to continue the matter for ninecy days was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. BILTMORE NOTOR HOTEL ON-SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED. motion approving the On-sale Beer License for the Biltmore Motor Hotel which had been due on April 1, 1969, was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. Councilman Courtney's HISTORICAL SITE PROPOSAL APPROVED. Park which is proposed to be located on a one acre parcel of land directly West of the Village Hall. group who have formed a Historical Society who propose that this be a living site which will encourage use by the community. Grange Hall and place.it on a basement foundation, place the old Cahill School'Building on a foundation and bring in utilities. of Councilman Johnson, Mr. Rosland said that while the area is not as large as, might be desired, it is felt that the accessibility to the property is good and that a piece of nostalgia in the midst of modern highway planning would focus more attention on the project. to be more satisfactory than Braemar Park because of the possible vandalism at: that location. Budget, Councilman Johnson's motion approving the Historical Site was seconded b$ Councilman Courtney and carried. appreciation for the cooperation of the Village. Mr. Hosland presented a plan for the Historic He noted that the Park Board has been working with a It is proposed to move the In response to a question ML". Hyde noted that this site was considered Upon being advised that funds for this project is in the A representative of the Grange expressed DOG LICENSE ORDINANAKCE &4ENDMENTS CONTINUED TO NAY 5. sion on changes in the dog ordinance as to license period and cost of dog licenses; Councilman Johnson's motion continuing-the matter to May 5, 1969, was seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. Following some discus- BOARD OF REVIEW HEARING DATE SET FOR JULY 15, 1969. Upon being advised that Hennepin County has set Board of Review for the Village of Edina on Tuesday, July 15, 1969, Councilman VanValkenburg's motion setting the meeting for 4 p.m. was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. ORDINANCE NO. 261-162 ORDINANCE DESCRIPTION CORRECTED. Mr. Hyde advised Council that &.clerical error had been descovered in Ordinance No. 261-162, Councilman VanValkenburg's motion that the ordinance be corrected and that . corrected publication be made as follows was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried: 4/21/69 ORDINANCE NO. 261-162 . , (Corrected) AN ORDINANCE AEBNDING ORDINANCE NO. 261 (ZONING .ORI&&NANCE) Oy THE VILLAGE OF *EDINA ESTABLISHING. ADDXTIONBL R-4 .mm RESIDENCE DISTRICT THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE;-.VIIJ;AGE OF.EDINA, EapSOTA, ORDAINS: Section 4, (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance No. 261 of revised ordi- nances of the Village of Edina,.as amended, is further amended by adding the- f o 1 lowing subparagraph : Section 1. Paragraph l,,Multip.le,Residence District.Boundaries of . District R-4: "(28) That tract of land situated in Section 19, Township 28N, Range 2457, described as follows: 'Beginning at the Southeast Corner of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence West along the South line thereof 400.0 feet; thence North and parallel to the East line of said Southeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 418.23 feet to the center of Valley vieiq Road as travelled; thence Southe,asterly along the said center line of Valley View Road 427.56 feet to the East line of said Southeast 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 thence South 275.55 feet to the place of beginning. I" after itsLpassage and publication according to law. 3iotion for adoption of the oediiiaix5eT?as corrected FJaS saxnded by Cbm5lman Courtney and on rollcall there were four ay corrected. ATTEST : Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and Y3 Village Clerk BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR pup REPAIR FOR WELL NO. 8. lister Department, Councilman Johnson's motion that bids be taken for repair of the pump for IJell No. 8 \?as seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried. ORDINANCE NO. 1.14-2 ADOPTED AT SECOND READING. No. 1.14-2 for Second Reading which proh5bits ~ open flame on wooden balconies whereupon Councilman VanValkenburg offered the following ordinance and moved its adoption : Upon the reCommendation of the I Mr. Hyde presented Ordinance .ORDINANCE NO, 114-2 AN,ORDINANCE PROHIBITING OPEN FWE FIRES IN CERTAIN EIULTIPLE DWELLINGS THE VILLAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDIN4 MINNESOTA, ORDAINS; further amended by adding thereto Sections 6 and 7, reading as follows: maintain or permit any fire or open flame on any balcony of a multiple*dwelling or apartment building in any barbecue, torch or similar heating, burning or light- ing equipment or device, except in dwellings or buildings of all masonry constru- ction. shall upon conviction be fined not more than $100 or imprisoned for not'more than 90 days, and shall also be liable to pay the costs of prosecution." age and publication. L Notion for adoption of the ordinance was sec rollcall there were four ayes and no nays Section 1, "Sec. 6. Ordinance No. 114 of the Village, as amended, is hereby Open Flame Fire on Wooden Balcony. No person shall set, kindle, "Sec. 7. Penalty. Any person violating any provision of this ordinance Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its pass- d by Councilman Courtney and on nd +he Ordinance as adopted. ATTEST : a @d?z I' Nayor OUTLOT 1, LOTS 1, 2, 3, 9, 10,. 11, 12, BLOCK 2, LAKE EDINA 3RT) ADDITION ACQUIRED Mr. Hyde recommended thegurchase by the Village of Outlot 1, Lots, 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, and 12, Block 2, Lake Edina 3rd Addition. He not,ed that the sellerragrees to pay all taxes and penalti-es due and payable thru December 31, 1969, for this property which is 137,000 square feet in area and that the cost to the Village would be $67,851.16. Mr. Hyde further noted that a portion of the land will be talcen by the state €or the 51. 77th Street Intersection. Council- man Courtney's motion was then seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried, authorizing acquisition of this property as recommended by the Village Manager. - BY VILLAGE. 4/21/69 / LOT 8, BLOCK 20, NORHANDALE PURCHASED BY VILLAGE. Mr. Hyde recommended the acquisition of Lot 8, Black 20,Normandale for park use, noting that the acquisition had been recommended by the Park Board and was included in the 1969 Budget. mended by the Village Manager was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. Councilman Courtney's mo-tion approving the acquisition as recom- SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING SET FOR APRIL 25, 1969, hg motion of Councilman Van, Valkenburg, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried, Meeting was set for 4:OO p.m. in the Conference Rij'om. CLAIMS PAID. Valkenburg for payment of the following claims as per pre-list dated April 21, 1969: General Fund, $100,429.00; Consfruction Fund, $66,634.88; Park, Park Construction, Swim Pool, Golf Course and Arena, $7,908.94; Water Fund, $5,689.14; Liquor Fund, $58,567.36; Sewer Rental, $1,123.41; Improvement Funds, $55,047.28;Poor Fund, $221.49; Total, $295,621.50. Hotion of Councilman Courtney was seconded by Councilman Van TREASURER'S placed on file by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Van Valkenburg and carried. REPORT as of February 28, 1969, was presented, reviewed and ordered No further business appearing, Councilman Courtney's motion for adjournment was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. Adjournment' at 10:35 p.m. fl &a' // qL c7J-h Village Clerk '