HomeMy WebLinkAbout19701215_regularMINUTES OF THE REGULARMEETING OF THE
EDINA VILLAGE COUNCIL HELD AT VILLAGE HALL ON
MONDAY, DECEMBER 15, 1970
E .
Members answering rollcall were Councilmen Courtney, Johnson, Shaw, VanValken-
burg and 'Mayor Bredesen.
MINUTES of November 17 and December 1, 1969, were approved as submitted by
motion of Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried.
WILLIAM J. OLSEN ZONING REQUEST CONTINUED TO JANUARY 19, 1970. Affidavits of
Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file.
Mr. Hoisington recalled that a hearing had been conducted on November 3, 1969,
but because the incorrect legal description had been used in legal notices,
this new hearing is being conducted.
been considered in an attempt to arrive at a proper decision on the use of Mr.
William'J. Olsen's property which is located South of W. 62nd Street, West of
Countryside Park and North of the Crosstown Highway. These four alternatives
are: 1) Acquisition of the total 'olse'n tract;
acres, leaving the remainder R-1 Residential District; 3) Acquisition of the
eight acres and reduce the density over the remainder of the tract (a new
agreement);
the eight acres and town house development of the remainder of the tract,
figuring give units per gross acre of the total.
Place, advised that he was speaking for property owners in the absence of
their attorney, Mr. Schumacher, who was unable to attend this meeting.
submitted a petition signed by over 1,100 residents opposing any zoning other
than R-1 for the property in question.
that this petition is an unrealistic hope from the standpoint of construction
and that he would like an opportunity to discuss a solution which had just
come to his attention with the attorney representing the property owners.
Mayor Bredesen noted that he believed that this suggestion would resolve the
matter to the satisfaction of the majority of residents concerned. Mayor
Bredesen made reference to an article in the paper which suggested that
anticipated HUD funds would be withheld from any suburban development which
would provide for large single family lots as opposed to higher density devel-
opment. Mr. Bunker said that Mr. Schumacher has advised that all zoning
cases are individual cases and that it is hoped that this case can be consid-
ered on its own merits.
of Minnesota which indicated that the funds which Edina would receive from
He recalled that four alternatives had
2) Acquisition of the eight
4) Pursue the present agreement with acquisition or dedication of
Mr. Donald Bunker, 5841 Jeff
He
Mayor Bredesen said that he believes I
He quoted from a brochure issued by the University
I \= HUD for Planned Residential zoning would not be anywhere near the added
the additional density. Mr. John K. Yarger, 6020 Arbour Avenue, asked why \! bc.' his wife had received no reply to two letters which she had written to the
Council requesting a reply to a number of questions.
that Mr. Hyde is working on a reply to the letters but that this letter is not
reading because of the fact that Mr. Hyde has been ill.
discussion, Councilman Shawls motion that the hearing be continued to January
19, 1970, in order that Mayor Bredesen, Mr. Schwartzbauer, Mr. Schumacher
and Mr. Bunker could meet and discuss the new idea which had come to the
Mayor's attention was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. Mr. Bunker
tlien requested that information be made available at that meeting as to the
elevation of Mud Lake, since it has been rumored that the normal elevation of
the lake would be higher than a number of basements.
t L' 3 expenditures that would be expected from this type of development because of -'
y' ,.)" Mayor Bredesen replied
\.!a
Following considerable
ORDINANCE NO. 261-197 GRANTED FIRST READING. Mr. Hoisington recalled to
Council that the request of Mr. David Thomas for R-4 zoning for Lots 1 and
2, Block 1, Elmwood Terrace, and Lot 1, Block 1, Elmwood Terrace 2nd Addition,
located south of 5412 France Avenue,had been continued so that Mr. Thomas
could provide more information as to his site plans.
he had plans for twelve units on two 'floors with one unit on the lower level
and that the building would be one foot lower than the building at 5412
France Avenue.
erected, drainage would be a problerp. Mr. James McClung, 5429 Halifax Lane,
pointed out that it was not only the height of the building that neighbors
opposed, but also the high density p-roposed in view of R-1 zoning on three
sides of the property. He pointed out that the original apartment at 5412
France Avenue was intended to serve as a buffer between the commercial area
at 54th and France and the existing R-1 dwellings. Mr. Douglas Reite, 5421
Halifax Lane, was assured that screening would be provided so that lights
from cars parking/$A &g !%g@%f the building would not bother Halifax Lane
residents. Mr. Ralph H. Goebel, 5417 Halifax Lane, was advised that the pro-
I- Mr. Thomas advised that
It was pointed out that no matter what type of building was
12/15/69
posed apartment would have its own entrance and would not use the driveway
of 5412 France Avenue. An unidentified man was assured by Mr. Hoisington
that the plan submitted appears to meet all ordinance requirements.
Shaw noted that he lives on the west side of Halifax Lane, facing the rear of
the proposed building. He recalled that in 1960 when the present apartment
building at 5412 France Avenue was approved, it was approved as a buffer between
the C-4 zoning and the R-1 area to the South. At that time, Planning Commis-
sion had indicated that no further high density apartments would be constructed.
He added that higher density would constitute a hardship because of egress to
France Avenue and that Halifax Lane residents would be looking at a three
story building to.the rear. Councilman Shaw also noted that the building
would be only 35 feet from the rear property line. Mr. Courtney said that at
the time the zoning for 5412 France Avenue was approved, it was approved by
anather Council and that this Council cannot be bound by its actions.
said that he does not believe Council can refuse to approve another building
of the same type.
agreeable to R-3 zoning which would have a maximum density of seven units and
said that this is the location at which the transition from R-4 zoning should
take place. Councilman Shaw then moved that the R-4 zoning be denied, which
motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Thomas advised an unidentified gentle-
man in the audience that the proposed apartment units will have two bedrooms
each. Following considerable discussion, Councilman Courtney offered Ordi-
nance No. 261-197 for First Reading with the stipulation that Second Reading
be withheld until a deed restriction is received limiting the building to
the height of 5412 France Avenue S. and with the further stipulation that
no variances be granted for the property.
with Councilman Shaw voting ."Nay":
\
Councilman
i
He
Councilman Shaw noted that residents would probably be
On rollcall there were four ayes
ORDINANCE NO. 261-197
AN ORDINANCE &ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 261
(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF'EDINA
ESTABLISHING ADDITIONAL R-4 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT
THE VILJAGE COUNCIL OF THE VILLAGE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 4, (Multiple Residence District) of Ordinance Np._2?1 of revised
ordinances of the Village of Edina, as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding the following subparagraph:
Section 1. Paragraph 1, Multiple Residence District Boundaries of
District R-4 :
''(33)
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
Lots One (1.) and Two (2), Block One (l), EQmwood Terrace and
Lot One (l), Block One (l), Elmwood Terrace 2nd Addition''
after its passage and publication according to law. .
STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-113 RE-ASSESSMENT APPROVED.(Bush Lake Road).
of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on
file. Mr. @rin noted that the project was levied on October 6, 1969 but
that this re-assessment is necessary due to the omission of Lot 3, Block 1,
Edina Interchange Center Second Addition.
cost at $34,673.45, proposed to be assessed against 1,018,609 assessable
square feet at $0.03404 per square foot.
had been received prior thereto, whereupon Councilman Courtney offered the
following resolution and moved its. adoption:
Affidavits
He presented total construction
No objections were heard and none
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING RE-ASSESSMENT FOR
STREET IMPROVEMENT BA-113
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, as
follows :
1.
re-assessment for Street Improvement No. BA-113, and at such hearing on Dec-
ember 15, 1969, has considered all oral and written objections presented
against the levy of such assessments.
2. Said re-assessments now on file in the office of the Village Clerk are
hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account Of said
improvement to be spread against the benefited lots, tracts and parcels of
land described therein, and the amount assessed against each such lot, tract
or parcel of land is hereby found not to exceed the local benefits conferred
thereon by said improvement.
3. The assessments shall be payable in ten equal annual installments, the
first installment payable in 1970, and all unpaid installments shall bear
interest at the rate of 5% per annum.
4..
Auditor a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assess
ments, with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately,
to be extended on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolu-
tion.
The Village has given notice of hearing as required by law on the proposed
The Village Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County
12/15/69
5. The Clerk shall also mail noece of-any special assessments which may be
payable by a county, by apolitical subdivision or by the owner of any right
of way, as"required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and
if any sucb assessment is not paid in a single installment, the Village
Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth
in said section.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was d by Councilman Shaw and on
rollcall there were five ayes and no nays resolution ,I s adopted.
A-nEST: Y I Mayor d+ 9.Yh
Village Clerk
DIVISION OF LOT 28, BLOCK 3, NORMANDALE SECOND ADDITION APPROVED. Mr:-Hoi&s
55gton'psesented thedequest of Mr. B. E. Johnsrud for division of Lot 28,
Block 3, Normandale Second Addition, noting that the division has already
occurred and that this is a 70 foot lot, with a house already built upon it.
Action of Council is necessary to clear title. Councilman VanValkenburg then
offered the following resolution and moved its adoption as recommended by Mr.
Hoisington:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Bernard E. Johnsrud and Dortha J. Johnsrud, husband and wife, are the
owners of a certain parcel of land in the Village of Edina described as follows:
That part of Lot 27 lying North of the South 20 feet thereof, and the
South 40 feet of Lot 28, Block 3, "Normandale Second Addition"; and
WHEREAS, said owners have requested approval of the Village of Edina of the
conveyance and ownership of the above described land as a separate parcel; and
IJHEREAS, it has been dtenn'ined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and
said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village of
Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A;
NOW, TrnREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village
of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tract of
land as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions
of Ordinance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and
conveyance, subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be
made of the above described tract of land unless made in compliance with the
pertinent ordinances of the Village of Edina or with the prior approval of
this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances.
rollcall tliere were five
ATTEST :
Motion for adoption of the
Mayor
Village Clerk 0
LOT 9, BLOCK 22, FAIRFAX ADDITION DIVISION APPROVED. Mr. Hoisington presented
the request of Mr. Frank Blumberg for division of Lot 9, Block 22, Fairfax
Addition, which division would take one foot from Lot 9 and add it to Lot 10.
No objections being heard, Councilman Johnson offered the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
'BESOLUTION
WHEREAS, B.G.& A. Properties, Inc., is the owner of a certain parcel of land
in the Village of Edina described as follows:
The South one foot of Lot 9, Block 22 and all of Lot 10, Block 22, .
Fairfax Addition; and
WHEREAS, said owner has requested approval of the Village of Edina of the
conveyance and ownership of the above described land as a separate parcel; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hard-
ship and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not interfere with the
purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village
of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership-of the above described tract of land
as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions
of Ordinance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said division and
conveyance, subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be
made unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the Village
of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by
I
-. - ~
12 /15 /69
these ordinances.
on rollcall there were five ayes and no n
BLOCK 15, MENDELSSOHN ADDITION DIVISION APPROVED. Mr. Hoisington presented
the appeal of Mr. R. H. Jacobson for division of Block 15, Mendelssohn Addi-
tion. He noted that Council had denied the request for division of the lot
on October 6, 1969, thinking that the lot was land-locked but that Mr.
Jacobson had advised that he is trying to acquire a number of pieces of
land and intends to replat the property at a near date.
heard, whereupon Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, Frederick G. Braun and Darlene A. Braun, husband and wife, are the
owners of a certain parcel of land in the Village of Edina described as
follows :
No objections were
RESOLUTION
South 1/2 of the %?est 130 feet of the North 1/2 of Block 15, Mendels-
sohn, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the duly recorded plat
thereof; and
IJHEREAS, said owners have requested approval,.of the Village of Edina of the
conveyance and ownership of the above described land as a separate parcel; and
IJHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zon-
ing Regulations of the Village of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said tract of land as a separate parcel does not: interfere with the
purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Village
of Edina Ordinance Numbers 261 and 263-A;
NQW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the Village Council of the Village
of Edina, Minnesota, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described
tract of land as a separate parcel is hereby approved and the requirements
and provisions of Ordinance Nos. 261 and 263-A are hereby waived as to said
division and conveyance, subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of the above described tract of land unless made in com-
pliance with the pertinent ordinances of the Village of Edina or with the
prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by these ordinances.
Notion for adoption of the resolution w
on rollcall there were five ayes and no
d by Councilman Johnson and
the resolut'on was adopted.
ATTEST : W /&A
Mayor
Village Clerk
SOUTHDALE ACRES R.L.S. HEARING DATE SET for January 5, 1970, by motion of
Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
HAROLD WOODS THIRD ADDITION HEARING DATE SET for January 5, 1970, for prelim-
inary plat approval by motion of Councilman Shaw, secnnded by Councilman
Courtney and carried.
WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT PRELIMINARY PLAT HEARING DATE SET for January 5,
1970, by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg
and carried.
KESLER-LILJA ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT HEARING DATE SET for December 29, 1.969,
by motion of Councilman VanValkenburg, seconded by Councilman Johnson and
carried.
cmIsnas CRECHE TO BE PERMITTED ON VILLAGE HALL PROPERTY FOR THIS YEAR.
Mayor Bredesen recalled that at the Council Meeting of November 3, 1969, it
had been decided to discontinue the practice of permitting the Edina Jaycees
to put a Christmas creche on Village Hall property in view of the fact that
it was understood that the Ministerial Association had recommended against
this practice. He advised that it has now come to his attention that a
majority of the Ministerial Association does not oppose the creche, nor do
they object to symbols of other religious groups on Village property. Mayor
Bredesen read letters favoring the creche in front of the Village Hall as
well as a letter from the minority group of the Ministerial Association urg-
ing that the practice be abandoned. Mr. Robert Sandilla, President of the
12/15/69
-Edina Jaycees, read a letter from his organization urging that the creche be
permitted as had been the custom.
3rd decision to deny permission to the Jaycees to put up the creche since
it had been advised that this action would violate federal law and since it
understood that the Edina Ministerial Association had recommended against
placing the creche on Village Hall property,
a meeting of the Edina Ministerial Association held December 15 at 7:30 a.m.,
the group voted not to oppose the creche or other religious symbols on Village
property by a vote of ten to five. Mr. Sandilla emphasized that the vote by
the Ministerial Associationxwas a reflection of their own personal opinions
and not necessarily the reflection of the position of their respective churches.
Mr. Sandilla then stated that there are no specific cases directly in point
which v?ould indicate'that placing the creche on Village property would
constitute a violation of federal law.
the creche on Villageproperty included Human Bights Commission members Father
Richard Jeub, Nr, Samuel Kaplan and Mesdames Norman Carpenter and Yvonne Ford,
Mr, Samuel Scheinerr; Executive Director of the Jewish Community, the Reverend
John Cumrains, Messrs, Glendon Lee, Arnold Schwartz and Nrs. Charlotte Nudell
also expressed opposition to the creche, stating that the creche displayed on
Village property implies that Edina is a Christian community and that this is
not true, Mrs. Diane Ferris asked why the Jaycees objected to putting the
creche on some church lawn, Mrs. Bea Palmer said that.she had always enjoyed
the creche but that she would not want to do anything which would make anyone
uncomfortable.
Cameron, an unidentified lady and a number of Edina Jaycees including Mr. James
Neville and Mr. Joseph Landry.
voted against the motion opposing the creche at the Human Rights Commission
meeting, but that he now has reversed his original position since the creche
offends some individuals. Councilman Courtney said that this country is a
democracy where the majority rules, butthat we are now becoming so sensitive
to the wishes of the minority that the majority no longer 'has the right to
determine what is done. Mayor Bredesen suggested that the creche be allowed
to be placed in front of the Village Hall'this year and that during the ensuing
months the Jaycees work with the Human Rights Commission and the Ministerial
Association in an attempt to find a solution,that would be agreeable to every-
one. Following considerable discussion, Councilman Courtney moved that the
Council reverse its decision of November 3 and allow the creche to be placed
in its customary place in front of the Village Hall, with the understanding
that other faiths be allowed to display their symbol on Village property also.
Counci%rna?i-YanVaUcenbiurg secbnded the motion, based on his understanding of
the legality of the matter, All voted !!aye" with the exception of Councilman
Johnson who voted 'hay".
the creche at the November 3 meeting because he had said that he would follow
the recommendation of the Ministerial Association and that since the majority
of the Ministerial Association now favors the creche, he would still follow
their recommendation, Councilman Shaw said that he has found the creche decora-
tive and that he hopes that the Jaycees will find a means of communicating
their message of "Peace on Earth'' in the future which wi11,be satisfactory to
all.
He noted that Council had based its November
Mr. Sandilla advised that at
Persons speaking against placement of
Speaking in favor of the creche were Mr. Hall, Mr. Kenneth
Councilman Johnson said that he had originally
.
Mayor Bredesen commented that he had voted against
c
QUTDQQR",ELE;CZRIC BARBECUE GRILL NOT PERMITTED ON APARTNENT BALCONIES.
Richard Hanauer requested Council approval for use of an outdoor electric barb-
eque grill which is sold by his company on apartment house balconies,
James McNellis advised Council that he has run tests of 'the grill and found
that it was a fire hazard and not safe to be used in accordance with Ordinance
No, 114-2, Following some discussion, Mayor Bredesen noted that this ordinance
was adopted specifically for charcoal cooking equipment and that there appeared
to be no reason to amend the ordinance. No action was taken.
Mr.
Chief
METROPOLITAN TAX FORUM will be held on December 17, 1969, at Bloomington and
municipal representatives have been invited to attend.
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SUIT REFERRED TO ATTORNEY. Mr, lljzlna
advised Council that the Village is being sued by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency which claims that the Village is polluting Nine Mile Creek.
Councilman Shawls motion referring the matter to the Village Attorney was
seconded by Councilman VanValkenburg and carried.
HENNEPIN COUNTY TAX ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE APPOINTED. Mr. Dpn advised Council
that the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners will create a committee con-
sisting 'of Municipal, County and Legislative interests to study methods
of improving assessment practices and procedures in Hennepin County.
was taken.
No action
12/15/69
1 OLD LIBRARY SITE DISCUSSION CONTINUED TO JANUARY 19 , 1970. Mr. Hoisington
recommended cQntinuation of the bld Library site matter, whereupon Council-
man VanValkenburg's motion continuing the matter to January 19, 1970, was
seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
DECEMBER 29, 1969, SPECIAL MEETING DATE SET as recommended by Mr. Dalen by
motion of Councilman Courtney, $econded.by Councilman Shaw and carried. The
meeting will be held at 4:OO p.m.
HAM RADIO TONER REFERRED TO VILLAGE ATTORNEY. Council was advised of a ham
radio tower estimated to be approximately ninety feet in height, which tower
has been delivered to and is awaiting erection at 5754 Wooddale Avenue.
Councilman VanValkenburg's motion referring the matter to the Village AEtorney
was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. Mr. Robert Stryk-suggested that
if this tower is not permitted, there may be reprocussions from the Radio
League.
.J
I
T.H. 100 AGREEMENT IJITH STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR ADVANCED FUNDING APPROVED.
llr. Dunn presented an agreement with the State of Minnesota Department of
Highways authorizing the Village to advance cash in the amount of $2,500,000
for improvement of T.H. 100, with repayment to be made to the Village by the
State of Minnesota.
offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
BE IT RESOLVED that the Village enter into an agreement with the Seate of
Minnesota, Department of Highways for the following purposes, to-wit: said
agreement being authorized under and persuant to Chapter 260, Session Laws
of Minnesota for 1969, to provide for the Village of Edina to advance cash in
the tokal amount of $2,500,000.00, by installments beginning in 1970, to
the State in order to expedite and facilitate the construction, by the State,
of a highway improvement project on Trunk Highway No. 100 which construction
includes the West 77th Street Interchange in Edina; and repayment by the State
of said cash advanced by the Village.
equal annual installments beginning January 1, 1973.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Village Manager be and they hereby
are authorized to execute such agreement. (Agreement No. 56349-M)
Motion for adoption of the resolution was d by Councilman Shaw and on
rollcall there were five ayes and no
ATTEST :
As recommended by Mr. Dunn, Councilman 3ahason then+
RESOLUTION
,Said repayment to be made in four
TOPICS PROGRAM AGREEMENT CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 29, 1969. Mr. Dunn presented
a proposed agreement between Hennepin County and Edina which would implement
the TOPICS Program.
December 29, 1969, so that the agreement could be studied further was seconded
by Councilman Shaw and carried. In reply to a question of Council, Mr. Dunn
advised that traffic counters owned by the Village have been sold.
Cpnncilman Johnson's motion continuing the matter to
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REFERRAL OF EDEN PRAIRIE WATER AND SEWER PROJECTS NOTED.
Mr. Dunn advised Council that a notice had been received from Metropolitan
Council advising that the Village of Eden Prairie will be making application
for federal funds to accomplish certain water and sewer projects.
was sent to the Village of Edina because some mutual problems are-involved.
No action was taken.
Notice
PERSONNEL ORDINANCE CONTINUED. 'Because of the absence of Mr. Hyde, Councilman
Courtney's motion continuing the proposed Personnel Ordinance to a later date
was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR APPOINTED.
man Shaw's resollut2ah':appointing Mr. Dalen as Director and Mr. Russel C. &&lund
as Alternate Director to the Suburban Rate Authority was made as follows:
Council-
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR
TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Edina, Minnesota, as
follows :
Jar1 N. Dalen is hereby designated as a Director of the Suburban Rate
Authority, and Russell C. Hedlund is hereby designated to serve as Alter-
nate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1970 and until
their successors are appointed.
284 12/15/70
Motion for adoption of the %solutio
and on rollcall there were five ayes
adopted .
ATTEST :
ded by Councilman VanValkenburg
s and the resolution was
dL LL7-1
Village Clerk
RECREATION CENTER FUND STATENENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1969,
was presented by Mr. Dalen, reviewed, and ordered placed on file by motion of
Councilman VanValkenburg, seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried.
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND RECOMEBNDED TRANSFERS FOR YEAR was
presented by Mr. Dalen, reviewed, and ordered placed on file by motion of
Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried.
TREASURER'S REPORT AS OF NOVEMBER 30, 1969, was presented, reviewed and.ordered
placed on file by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw
and carried.
CLAIMS PAID.
was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried: General Fund, $143,927.35;
Construction Fund, $220,771.92; Park, Arena; Park Const., Golf, Swimming,
$114,227.32; Water Fund, $6,934.74; Liquor Fund, $93,753.22; Sewer Fund,
$2,395.79; Improvement Fund, $359.46; Poor Fund, $5,530.37; Total, $587,910.17.
Councilman Shawls motion for payment of the following claims
No further business appearing, Councilman'Shaw's motion for adjournment was
seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried., Adjournment at 10:20 p.m.
Village Clerk