Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19740603_regular157 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR IBETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON MONDAY, ' JUNE 3, 1974 Answering rollcall were Council members Courtney, Johnson, Schmidt, Shaw and Mayor Van Valkenburg. 1.IIMUTES of May 20, 1974, were approved as submitted by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and carried. BRAENAR PAPX STADIUM DISCUSSED AT JOINT EEETING UITH SCHOOL - BOARD. Mr. Fred Richards, a member of the Citizens' Study Committee, reviewed briefly the report of the CcjmrhitteA as formally submitted to the School Board and to the Council. The Citizens' Committee, as Mr. Richards pointed out, was originally formed by the School Board to study the question of whether artificial turf should be placed on the present stadium site located on the Edina East Campus. After several meetings, the Committee reported back by letter to Dr. Lieber that artificial turf t7as not the answer to their problem and that the Committee would be willing to study further the total athletic space problem r- both at Edina East and Edina West. Four study sub-committees were appointed from the Citizens' group as follows : 1. 2. 3. 4. To study Braemar Park as a site for the stadium. 1. To study the Edina East Campus; To study the Edina West Campus; To study what potential open space was left in the City on which a stadium could be placed; The Committee kubmitted two basic recommendations as follows : Edina East site is totally inadequate. the total area be redesigned for better use prior to any additional improvements or alterations made; 2. The stadium be moved to Braemar Park. The stadium should be moved and Although not included in any of the four reports, the total Committee felt that both campuses should have a practice track and that a competitive all-weather surface track be designed for both schools at a neutral site since both campuses are overcrowded. Dr. John Hoyt, Chairman of the School Board, commented that he could not see the expenditure of capital funds for this type of improvement when it has been necessary to curtail many other school programs. Councilman Courtney said that he did not believe that temporary measures should be taken and that if a stadium is needed and approved, it should be constructed properly at this time. Discussion ensued as to the legality of construction of this facility on land which is not situated within the boundaries of School District 273. Valkenburg reiterated that the purpose of this meeting is merely to get the reaction of the School Board and the Council. As recommended by Councilman Johnson, it was informally agreed that two members of the School Board and two members of the Council be appointed to serve as a liason to investigate the legal problems of use of the Braemar site and methods of financing the improve- ment. Mayor Van Valkenburg expressed his thanks to the School Board and to Mr. Richards and the Committee for holding this joint meeting with the Council. ' Mayor Van 8 ISSUE AREAS 1 AND 3 OF WESTERN EDINA TRAFFIC TASK FORCE REPORT APPROVED; ISSUE AREAS 2 AND 4 CONTINUED TO JULY 1, 1974. Western Edina Traffic Task Force Report had been continued from the meeting of May 20, 1974. Mr. James Thorp, 5901 Walnut Drive, presented a petition represent- ing 114 homes in Issue Areas 1 and 2 which requested the adoption of Alternative 2 for Issue Area 1 (which calls for a road going on the South side of Krahl Hill and with a cul-de-sac on Vernon Avenue near Walnut Drive) and the adoption of Alternatives 3 and G for Issue Area 2 (which calls for a Westerly exit to Lincoln Drive and the removal of barricades in the Parkwo.od Knolls area). Mr. Thorp described the consequence to properties at the North end of Walnut Drive if the bridge should be constructed over Nine Mile Creek and said that there is no real traffic problem except for the intersection of View Lane and Schaefer Road which had a traffic count of 2,200 per day. were Messrs. Lowell Holden, 6016 Tamarac Avenue, Robert Burgoyne, 5936 Walnut Drive, the resident at 6108 Arctic Way and Dr. Roy-Dickman, 6420 Aspen Road, who said that it would be too costly and would spoil the natural swampy area and game preserve to build a road thru the park. Nr. Henry Hodde, 6600 Londonderry Road, said that he represented the ovemhelm- ing majority of residents on Biscayne Blvd, Dovre Drive, Londonderry Drive, Londonderry Road, Field Nay and Newport Drive. He reviewed the various alterna- tives for Issue Area 2, along with traffic patterns, and recommended that all alternatives be rejected except Alternative 3. He explained that Alternative 3 pr0yides.a circuitous outlet from the neighborhood which "gives general dis- comfort to the entire area". Mr. ,Douglas Johnson, 6650 Parkwood Road, and Mr. Mayor Van Valkenburg recalled that the ' Concurring with Pfr. Thorp With the aid of the view-graph, 158 6/3/74 i Kocourek agreed that the barricades have not solved any problem and should be removed. They requested that action be taken at this meeting. 34r. Robert Odden said that he had lived on Walnut Drive since it was only a block long and that the culvert had never been used as a public crossing across Nine Nile Creek. It was brought out that in the past, Walnut Drive residents had been assured by Council that Falnut Drj.ve would never be open and that there would be a buffer between Ualnut Drive and any apartment construction to the West. 3Ir. Lloyd Cherne, 5704 View Lane, said that he had personally driven across the creek at Walnut Drive in the past. around Krahl.Hil1 w0dd do environmental damage and that emergency vehicles could not get into the area if Vernon Avenue should be closed. 6104 Arctic Ilay, and Nr. $farshall Pieczentkowski, 6537 Polar Circle, entered into a discussion on the definition and designation of "local streets" and "col- lector streets". Nr. John Goal, 6805 Telemarlc Tra'i.1, pointed out that there is only one exit for emergency vehicles for the thirty homes in his area. David Taft, 5605 Schaefer Road, suggested that the temporary barricades remain in place and suggested also moving the barricade between Londonderry Drive and Stauder Circle to a 90' angle. Nr. Dunn presented traffic counts which were made at various times during the month of May and pointed out that the barri- cades had made very little difference generally and that the drop in traffic at the intersection of View Lane and Schaefer Drive was less than 200 per day. He clarified that Schaefer Drive traffic increased by approximately 50 vehicles and that South Knoll Drive traffic had increased by approximately 300 vehicles. llr. Odd Noe, 5706 So. Blake Road, said that the City would be creating a serious traffic problem by funneling more traffic on to Blake Road. 6416 Stauder Circle, said that he is not so much concerned about the amount of traffic as about the speed of traffic. wood Knolls Traffic Association, said that the construction of the bridge over Nine Nile Creek would increase traffic on Walnut Drive, but not beyond normally acceptable residential traffic. He- said that with Parkwood ICnolls continuing to. grow, streets should be opened and not closed. Dr. Chandler said that Alter- native 6 is against sound traffic principles and requested that the barricades be removed, at the earliest possible date. In reply to a question of'Mr. Ernest Thorson, 5917 Walnut Drive, Hr. Hyde said that Mr.Car1 Hansen had submitted a master plan for ParJmood Knolls which dates back to 1948. had told Blr. Harvey Hansen that he must get a road open to the Northwest which would tie into County Road 18 plans, and that Mr. Hansen had agreed that as soon as the Council decided just what it wanted, he would work with the City to develop road plans for that area. Nr. Hyde added that only recently did Nr. Hansen purchase his property on County Road 18. Councilman Shaw said that he believed that people who move to a dead end street in a community that is not already developed are simply deluding themselves that it will always remain that way. He then spoke of the difference of opinion which exists over whether or not Walnut Drive did have a legal crossing of Nine Mile Creek in the form of a dirt road over a culvert for a sufficient number of years to have warranted a prescriptive easement for a road and requested a legal opinion from the City Attorney as to whether or not the City does have a legal right-of-way at the end of Walnut Drive that would connect with Londonderry Road. discussion, action was taken as follo~~s : Issue Area 1 - Councilman Johnson moved that concept approval be granted to a combination of Alternatives 2 and 3, with the Vernon Avenue cul-de-sac to be designed on plans and maps but not closed at the present time and with the under- standing that if traffic becomes excessive, the cul-de-sac could be completed. Mayor Van Valkenburg told an unidentified gentleman in the audience that this Council could not bind future Councils on a definition of "excessive traffic". Nr. Hyde clarified that there is no right-of-way for a road between Krahl Hill and the Crosstown Highway and that the City will have to deal with property owners for right-of-way. He added that new zoning requests for the area might be forthcoming. and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the motion was carried. Issue Area 2 - Councilman Johnson moved that concept approval be granted for Alternative 3. there were five ayes and no nays and the motion carried. Councilman Johnson then moved that the City Attorney render an opinion, both as to whether or not a road can legally be constructed thru the park along the creek and also as-to whether or not the City owns a legal right-of-way at the end of Walnut Drive as requested by Councilman Shaw. Councilman Johnson also requested that sir. Dunn furnish Council with the cost of construction of a road thru the park and that Council should have some input on the ecological impact on such a road from the Nine PEle Creek Watershed District and the Edina Environmental Quality Commis- sion. floater" could be constructed if Council would be satisfied with that type of road, but that there is no way that a good road could be built over the He objected that construction of a road Nrs. Carolyn Denclcer, Mr. Blr. Vernon Tefg, Dr. Vm, Chandler, President of the Park- He urged the combination of Alternatives 1 and 3 simultaneously He recalled that only last week he Following considerable Councilman Johnson's motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt Notion was seconded by Councilman Courtney and on rollcall In response to Councilman Johnson, Mr. 'Dunn said that a "Braemar Blvd. 6/3/74 \ swampy ground. Commission had already recommended that the road thru the park should not be constructed because it would cause sFgnificant environmental damage to the creek, the flood plain and the park and that only one Western crossing of Nine Mile Creek be undertaken. He added that the Park Board had not yet officially considered the question. City Attorney on Alternates 1 and 5 was then seconded by Councilman Shaw and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the motion was carried. Van Valkenburg clarified that an affirmative vote on the motion did not neces- sarily mean that he and the Council were in favor of building a road thru the park. Councilman Shaw then moved that the barricades be immediately removed. Councilman Johnson said that he tielieved that it is too early to assess the impact of the barricades and that they should be left up for a longer period of time. Councilwoman Schmidt said that she would like to see the barricades removed, and, in'addition, would like to see the speed limit reduced to 20 miles per hour. Schmidt and on rollcall there were three ayes, with Councilmen Courtney and Johnson voting "nayre and the motion carried. rejecting Alternates 2, 4 and 6 was then seconded by Councilman Courtney and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the motion carried. Issue Area 3 - Councilman Johnson's motion for concept approval of Alternate 1 v7as seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the motion carried. Issue Area 4 - Councilman Johnson's motion that Issue Area 4 be continued until July 1, 1974, was seconded by Councilman Courtney and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the motion carried. Mr. Dunn suggested that if Council hired a consultant to do a preliminary eng- ineering study, the work could be speeded up by approximately four months. Mr. Dunn was directed by motion of Councilman Johnson, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried, to have some preliminary conversation with engineering consultants on the possibility of obtaining additional engineering assistance so that the roads could be constructed at an earlier date. Motion of Councilman Johnson was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried, setting July 1, 1974, as the date on which the attorney's opinion would be presented to the Council on the legalities raised concerning Issue Area 2. Councilman Shaw reiterated his statement that, should Council decide that it would be advisable to extend Interlachen Blvd., to the West, that right-of-way be acquired and that any such proposed action be well publicized. Mr. Hyde pointed out that the Edina Environmental Quality Councilman Johnson's motion for a opinion by the Mayor * Motion of Councilman Shaw was then seconded by Councilwoman Councilman Johnson's motion I W a PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice of Public Hearings for, Storm 'SeweiS P-ST.S-139 and FsST.SL140 and Parking Lot Grad- ing P-P-2 were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. taken as herein recorded for these proposed improvements as well as for Sanitary Sewer P-SS-317 and Watermain P-WM-287 which had been continued from earlier meetings : A. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOWING: (P-SS-317) Easement line in Mirror Lake Plat No. 2 from existing sanitary sewer at Lake Ridge Road cul-de-sac to serve property South of Mirror Lake Plat No. 2 Mr. Dunn recalled that this improvement had been continued from the meeting of May 20, 1974, upon the request of one of the property owners who was out of town. He presented total estimated project cost at $21,802.49, proposed to be assessed against Lot 3, Block 1, Mirror Lake Plat No. 2 for one connection at a rate of $1,500 and against 25 possible future lots lying South of Mirror Lake Plat No. 2 at a rate of $812.14 per lot. none had been heard since the last meeting. izing the improvement was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. Resolution Ordering Improvement later in Minutes. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. F-l?M-287 IN THE FOLLOWING: East Frontage Road Highway 100 from Payton Court to West 66th Street and Sherwood Avenue Mr. Dunn recalled that this hearing had been continued originally from the meeting of February 15, 1974, waiting for the Highway Department to acquire right-of-way along the East Frontage Road of T.H. 100. He said that one well in the area is failing and recommended bringing the matter back to Council on June 17, 1974, at which time consideration could be given to running the mains down the back lot line. recommended by Mr. Dunn was then seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. 3. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P-ST.S-139 IN THE FOLLOWING: - Pursuant to due notice given, public hearings were conducted and action No persons were present to offer objections and Councilman Johnson's motion author- (See * Councilman Johnson's motion to continue the hearing as Gleason Road from Dewey Hill Road to approximately 900 feet South of the South line of Hyde Park Drive Mr. Dunn explained that Storm Sewer Improvement P-ST.S-139 is a lateral system which serves a portion of Hyde Park Addition and Braemar Hills 7th Addition and replaces Storm Sewer Improvement ST.S-128 which was heard in 1969. Mr. Dunn & 6/3/74 said that the assessment for property in Braemar Hills 7th Addition would be proposed to be spread over a three year period in accordance with the terms of a Developer's Agreement between the developer and the City of Edina. ments for other properties are proposed to be spread over a ten year period. Estimated construction cost of the improvement was given by Mr. Dunn at $19,192.28 which is proposed to be assessed at a rate of $26.46 per 1000 assess- able square feet. Mr. P. Kenneth Peterson, attorney for Hyde'Parlt Development and Hyde Park 2nd Addition, read a statement relating to Hycle Park and Hyde Park 2nd Addition as they relate to the subjects of storm sewer drains and to the relationship of 'bultiple dwelling apajkmerits dalled town houses". son said that study of the plans of Braemar Hills 7th Addition show that six of the proposed units are approximately 50 feet from the South bounda-g of Hyde Park property which is zoned single family. Hyde Park Development .Company was ever notified of any hearings concerning the Braemar Hills 7th Addition plans. these town houses into otherwise green area has brought about serious relations between the Hyde Park Development Company and the City Planning Department. The land that would normally be the drainage basin for that area has been planned into improper housing. Mr. Peterson said that, if the plans proceed as shown, very expensive storm drains from Gleason Road must be installed through Hyde Park property and he said that his client is ready to work out new plans for storm drainage with the City Engineering Department. Nr. Dunn clarified that there has been a lack of communication between the developer of Hyde Park and the Planning Commission. the Planning Commission has suggested a meeting with Nr. Luce, Nr. Dunn and ?$r. Johnston and Mr. Astleford, the developers, before the next Planning Commission In reply to Mr. Ed Johnston's contention that he had never had any written notice of any subdCvision related to their property since any of it was started, Mr. Dunn said that the records. would show that notices have been mailed. Councilman Johnson's motion continuing-the hearing on Storm Sewer ST.S-139 for one month was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and carried. 4. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P-ST;S-140 IN THE FOLLOVING: Assess- I Mr. ,Peter- He added that no officer of Mr. Peterson said that the stacking of He said hhiprogress has been made on the plat and that .meeting to see if problems could be worked out. Following considerable discussion, Southwest Edina from 1.1. 70th Street to Interstate 494 and from Cahill Road to Braemar Golf Course I Mr. Dunn explained that Storm Sewer Improvement No. P-ST.-140 is the trunk sewer &stem for Storm Sewer 117 which is generally for the Prospect Hills area. He reviewed the history of Storm Sewer 117 which indicated that at the time the storm sewer was ordered installed in 1968, it had been noted that there would be a future connector, classified as a trpnk, that would be normally assessed against all of the properties that were involved in Storm Sewer 117. that when the Prospect Hills street improvement was authorized by 'CoimC%2tl&5t?year, the second half of the Storm Sewer 117 lateral was installed and that the proposed storm sewer is the outlet for the entire Prospect Hills storm sewer system, with the pipes to be installed thru the ponds that are now being developed South of Dewey Hill Road. In response to a statement of an unidentified gentleman in,the audience, Mr. Dunn said that the proposed storm sewer is not an assessment for future development South of Dewey Hili Road but the final end of the system that has been designed for the entire area. Mr. Jack Brown, 7308 Claredon Drive, said that the storm sewer should be paid for by those who will be the ultimate benefici- aries of it. area on October 28, 1968 which documented statements made by Mr. Dunn. He recalled that about 1956 or 1957, the Kemrich Knolls area had served as a ponding area for upper Prospect Hills and that storm sewer jobs have been planned along with devel- opment. Mr. Hyde explained the general philosophy of storm sewers in the City by which residents of high property pay €heir share of a storm sewer for the water which -runs from their property into the low property. the possibility that this might be case where extraordinary benefits might be assessed to low lying areas and they would be assessed at a higher rate than the higher propertiek.B.fr. Dunn pointed out that the development of the ponding area saved a lot of money -for the project. in the audience that the storm sewer must be installed at this time because of development in the area and he told 31r. Robert Naegeli that he would check out the amount of footage fo; which he was proposed to be assessed.: He explained that a special formula had been developed for the assessment of large lots. Councilman" Courtney' s motion ~7as then seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried that the improvement be authorized with the understanding 'that the'method of assessment be reconsidered before the Assessment Hearing. Ordering Improvement late; in lknutes . ) 5. CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING LOT GRADING AND SURFACING IlPROVENENT P-P-2 IN THE He recalled 3k. Hyde read from a letter which was sent to property owners in the Councilman Johnson suggested . Mr. Dunn advised an unidentified gentleman ' (See Resolution FOLLOVING : , _. . ." 6/3/74 Behind Grandview Liquor Store (Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6, Block 3, Grandview Heights Addition and Vest 1/2 vacated Brookside Avenue) As recommended by Mr. Dunn, Councilman Couftney's motion continuing the hearing on Parking Lot Grading P-P-2 to JuAg 11,1974, was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. and moved its adoption: Councilman Courtney thereupon offered the following resolution RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS NOS. SANITARY SEIa7ER SS-317 AND STORM SEWER ST. 5-140 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the proposed improvements as follows : ' 1. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOTKtNG : Easement line in Mirror Lake Plat No. 2 from existing sanitary sewer at Lake Ridge Road cul-de-sac to serve property South of Mirror Lake Plat No. 2 A. 2. . CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEIJER IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOWING: Prom Cahill Road to Braemar Golf Course from West 70th Street io Interstate Highway #494 and at the hearings held at th'e time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the con- struction of said improvements as described in the published notices of said hearings, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvements, wi.th the understanding that the method of assessing Storm Sewer Improvement St.S-140 be reconsidered before the Assessment Hearing; that said improvements are hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: No. 1 Above SANX'EARY SEWER I~ROVEIdENT NO. SS4317 No. 2 Above STORM SEk7ER IMPROVEMINT NO. ST. 5-140 and the area to be specially assessed for Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS-317 shall includelot 3, Block 1,'rYlirror Lake Plat No. 2, Parcels 4000 and 5400, S% Sec. 29, T. 117, R. 21; and the area to be specially assessed for Storm Sewer Improvement ST.S-140 above shall include all lots and tracts of land within the following described boundaries: Commencing at a point on the South line of the N f Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21, said point being 50' West of the SE corner of said N$ Sec. 8; thence Wly along the South line of the N% of Sec. 8 to a point of intersection with the Sly extension of the If. line of Lot 9, Block 3, Kemrich Knolls Addition; thence Nly along the West line of Lots 9 and 8, Block 3, Kemrich Knolls Addition and their Nly extension to the North line' of Lot 1, Block 2, Kemrich Knolls Addition; thence NWly to a point 155' North of the South line and 240' West of the East line of Outlot "A", M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills Addition; thence NEly and Nly 240' Ely of and parallel to the East line of Block 3, M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills Addition to a point 160' South of the North line of said Outlot "A"; thence NG7ly to a point on the North line of Lot 4, Block 2, Hondo Addition, said point being 50' East of the NI.7 comer of said Lot 4; thence Nly to a point on the North line of Lot 2, Block 2, Hondo Addition, said point being 50' East of the NV corner of said Lot 2; thence Nwly to the NW corner of Lot 1, Block 2, Hondo Addition; thence Wly alung the North line of Hondo Addition to a point on the North line of Lot 1, Block 1, Hondo Addition; said point being 40' West of the NE corner of said Lot 1; thence SWly to a point on the West line of said Lot 1, said point being 50' South of the Nd comer thereof; thence Sly along the West line of Block 1, Hondo Addition to a point 50' South of the NW corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Hondo Addition; thence Wly at right angles, a distance of 130'; thence NWly to a point on the West line of Lot 2, Block 1, A1 Petersen Addition, said point being 70' North of the SW comer of said Lot 2; thence SWly to the SW corner of Lot 1, Prospect Hills Addition; thence NWly to a point on the West line of Lot 4, Prospect Hills Addition, said point being 88.3' North of the SW corner of said Lot 4; thence NWly to a point on the East line of Tract A, R.L.S. 971, said point being 100' North of the South line of said Tract rrArr; thence Wly, 100' North of and parallel to the South line of said Tract "A", to a point 100' "A"; thence SWly to a point on the Uest line of Tract "B?, R.L.S. 971, said , point being 58' North of the SW comer of said Tract "B"; thence SNly to the ST? comer of Lot 7, Prospect Hills Addition; thence'SWly to the SE corner of Lot 8, Prospect Hills Addition;'thence SEly to a point on the Ely line of Lot 10, Prospect Hills, said point being 40' SJly from the most NEly corner of said Lot 10; thence Sly to a point;on the West line of Lot 13, Prospect Hills Addition, said point being 228.53' Nly of the S\J corner of said Lot 13; thence Sly to a point on the South line of said Lot 13, said point being 60' East ' , East of the West line of said Tract 6/3/74 of the SN corner thereof; thence SEly to a point on the South line of Lot 12, Prospect Hills Addition, said point being 149' Vest of the SE corner thereof; thence SEly to a point on the Sly line of Lot 1, Block 1, Schey's Park View 2nd Addition, said point being 100' SWly of the SE corner thereof; thence SEly to a point on the East line of Lot 2, Block 1, Schey's Park View 2nd Addition, said point being 50' North of the SE corner thereof; thence SEly to a point on the North line of Lot 2, Block 2, Prospect Hills 2nd Addition, saih point being 50' East of the NH comer thereof; thence SEly along the North line of said Lot 2 and its Ely extension to the East line of Tralee Drive; thence SEly to a point 60' Ely of the West line'and 75' Nly of the South line of Lot 1, Block 3, Pros- pect Hills 2nd Addition; thence SEly to a point in Lot 5, Block 3, Prospect Hills 2nd Addition, said point being 30' South of the North line and 35' West of'the East line of said Lot 5; thence SEly to a point in Lot 2, Bldck 3, Pros- pect Hills, said point being 30' South of the M;I corner of said Lot 2 and 20' East of the West line thereof; thence SIJly to a point in Lot 6, Block 3,'Pros- pect Hills 2nd Addition, said point being 85' SN of the East line and 100' North of the South line of said Lot 6; thence Sly to a point on the North line of Lot 12, Block 1, Holand's 1st Addition, said point being 100' West of the NE corner of said Lot 12; thence SWly to a point on the West line of said Lot 12,-said point being 80' SEly of the NW corner thereof; thence SIJly to the SE comer of Lot 3, Block 3, Schey's Park View 3rd Addition; thence NWly to a point in said Lot 3, said point being 40' North of the South line and 30' \?est of the East 1Jne of said Lot 3; thence SPJly to a point in said Lot 3, said point being 165' Vest of the East line and 40' North of the South line of said Lot 3; thence Nrly to a point in said Lot 3, said point being 230' Nest of the East line and 70' North of the South line of said Lot 3, chence NNly to the NN comer of said Lot 3; thence 17ly along the Vly extension of the North line of said Lot 3 to. the center line of Schey Drive; thence Sly along the center line of Schey Drive to the center line of Dewey Hill Road; thence SWly to a point on the South line of Lot 20, Block 1, Hyde Park Addition, said point being 50' West of the SE corner thereof; thence SEly tDa point on the NEly line of Lot 9, Block 1, Hyde Park Additio?, said poikt being 55' Sly of the most Nly corner thereof; thence SWly to a point in Outlot "D", Hyde Park Addition, said point being 535' North of the South line and 160' East of the West line of said Outlot "D"; then& Wly to a point on the West line of said Outlot "D", said point being 515' North of the SJ corner of said Outlot "DU; thence SEly to a point in sai$ Outlot*"D", said point being 140' East of the Vest line and 355' North of the South line of said Outlot "D"; thence SEly to a point in said Optlot "D", said point being 155' East of the West line and 260' North of the South line of said Outlot "D"; thence SWly to a point in said Outlot IrD1', said point being 50''East of ihe West line and 130' North of the South line thereof; thence S1.71~ to a point on the North line of the SE3; of the SE3; of Sec. 7, T. 116, R. 21, said point being 110' IJest of the NE corner of said SE% of the SE3;; thence SWly to a point in the 3E-t; of the SE% Sec. 7. T. 116, R. 21, said point being 270' IJest of the East line and 460' North of the South line of said SEIJ; of the SE-3;; thence SEly to a point in the. said SE3; of tb SEIJ;, said point being 210' West of the East line and 425' North of the South line of said SE3; of the SEk; thence NEly to a point in the 37% of the SW%, Sec. 8, T. llc, R. 21, said point being 598' North of tk South line of Outlot "A", Braemar Hills'7th Addition and 800' West of the East line of Lot 1, Block 13, Braemar Hills 7th Addition; thence NEly to the St7 corner of Lot 3, Block 7, Braemar Hills 7th Addition; thence NEly to a point in Lot 2, Block f3, Braemar Hills 7th Addition, which point is on the NEly ex- tension of the NVly line of Lot 3, Block 7, Braemar Hills 7th Addition and 859' North of the South line of Outlot "A", Braemar Hills 7th Addition; thence Nly 725' West of and parallel to the East line of said Outlot "Brr, a distance of 140'; thence NEly to a point in Lot 1, Block 14, Braemar Hills 7th Addition, said point being 150' South of the North line of said Lot. 1 and 620' West of the East line of said Outlot "Btr; thence Ely 150' South of and parallel to the North line of said Lot 1, Block 14, a distance of 40'; thence SEly to a point in Outlot "B", Braemar Hills 7th Addition, said point being 385' West of the East.line and 370' South of the North line of said Outlot 'IB1'; thence NEly.to a point in said Outlot ''Brt, said point being 275' South of the North line and 345' West of the East line of said Outlot "B"; thence Nly to a point in said Outlot , said point being 70' South of the North line and 330' Nest of the East line of said Outlot "B"; ehence SEly to a point in said Outlot "B", said point being 120' sbuth of the,North line and 70' TJest of the East line of said Outlot "B"; thence NEly to a point in the NE& of the SN3; of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, said point being 105' East of the Vest line and 15' North of the South line of said NE% of the sr;lct;; thence SEly to a point in the SE3; of the SI?%, SeC. 8, T. 116, R. 21, said point being 210' South of the North line and 210' East of the k7est line of said SEIJ; of the SW3;; thence SWly to a point in the SE3; of the SV+, Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21, said point being 435' South of the North line and 150' East of the TJest line of said SE% of the SrJ-3;; thence SEly to a point in the SEk of the S@5, Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21, said point being 570' South of the North I I - I r'Blf 6/3/74 1 1 r,Lie and 190' East of the ,.>st line of said SE-", of the SI?-",; thence SEly to a point in the SE% of the Si?%, Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21, said point being 675' South of the North line and 270' East of the Vest line of said SEk of the SI-&; thence SEly to a point in the SEk of the SWk, said point being 950' South of the North line and 490' East of tk West line of said of the Si?%; thence SEly to a point on the South line of Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21, said point being 625' East of the SI? corner of the SE% of the SW% of said Sec. 8; thence Ely along the South line of Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21 to the SE corner of Lot 1, Block 9, Edina Interchange Center Addition; thence Nly along the East line of said Atwood Station Subdivision; thence Ndly along the North line of 14. 75th St, to the N? corner of I?. 78th St. and Cahill Road; thence NNly to a point in the Sb7k of the SSk, Sec. 8, T. 116, R. 21, said point being 998' East of the Vest line and 600' North of the South line of said SI*& of the SEk; thence Nwly to a point in the said SlJk of the SEk, said point being 660' North of the South line and 505' East of the West line of the said Sa% of the SE%; thence NWly to a point on the East of Outlot 1, Heath Glen Addition, said point being 180' South of the NE corner of said Outlot 1; thence NEly to the South line of Lot 1, Block 1, Smisek Addition, said point being 430' Vest of the SE corner of said Lot 1; thence Nly to the North line of Lot 1, Block 1, Smisek Addition, said point being 4GO' West of the NE corner of said Lot 1; thence NWly to a point &n the NWg of the SEk, said point being 60' North of the North line of Smisek Addition and 525' West of the East line of said 1CrrJ.k of the SEg; thence NEly to a point of beginning and there terminating. Notion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the resolution was adopted. 'Lot 1, Block 9, and its Nly extension to the SE corner of Lot 2, Block 1, I ORDINANCE NO. 811-A48 GRANTED SECOND READING; PUBLICATION WITHHELD. Ek. Hj?d@ presented Ordinance No. 811-A48 for Second Reading and Final Development . Approval , noting that the developer has requested PRD-2 Planned Residential District zoning for the Schuster farm property located generally Hill Road and I?. 78th Street, West of Cahill Road and East of Shannon Drive, extended. He recalled that during the concept stage of this plan, many of the requirements for final development had already been taken care of and advised 'that the staff and Planning Commission had recommended approval conkngent on: 1) a significant increase in the amount and size of vegetation; 2) the extension of the bicycle path from its present termination at the North end of Shaughnessy Road to W. 78th Street; and 3) an approved subdivision. Elr. Scott Godine of Mark Z. Jones ASSOC., Inc., said that they have increased the size of some of the smaller dwelling units and decreased the size of some of the larger units. 811-A48 for Second Reading with Final Development Approval, with the understand- ing that publication be withheld until the subdivision is approved and the Developer's Agreement is signed and with the understanding that there is a significant increase in the amount and size of vegetation and the bicycle path extended as recommended by thG Planning Commission: between Dewey No objections being heard, Councilman Shaw offered Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 811-A48 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PRD-2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: . ' Section 1. Paragraph 4 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is enlarged by adding the following thereto:' 2 "The extent of the.Plarined Residential District (Sub-District PRD-3) is That part of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter add that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, described as beginning at the Northwest corner of the East 1569.92 feet of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence South along the 'Nest line of the East 1569.92 feet of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter to the South line of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence East to the Northwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence South along the Nest line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 733 feet; thence East parallel with the North line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 448 feet; thence South parallel with the West line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance of 528.51 feet; thence deflecting to the left 89 degrees 35 minutes 01 seconds a distance of 350.16 feet; thence NQrtheasterly on a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 1392.70 feet a distance of 176.84 feet; thence Northwesterly radial with the last described curve a distance of 10.0 feet; thence Northeasterly along a curve to the left, having a radius of 1382.70 feet, said curve being parallel with the continuation %6 %hg 6%F l~~c'ojfb~~ec~~~he~s~~~~~~~ro 5 2$%e9 ko5iYiwes? 6 uarter; enlarged by the addition of the following property: t m r or less 6/3/74 i thence North to t..e Northeast corner of the South 0 feet of the Nort I half of the Southwest Quarter; thence West parallel with the South line of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter 396.2 feet; thence North parallel with the East line of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter to the North line of the North Half of the Southwest Quarter; thence Vest to the point of beginning; except the North 800 feet thereof, which is in Sub- District PRD-2. '' Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its pass- age and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Courtney and on ATTEST : REPLAT OF EVANSWOOD 2ND ADDITION CONgNUED TO JULY 1, 1974. that Replat of Evanswood 2nd Addition had been continued from April 1, 1974, because neighbors had objected that drainage problems would be caused by the plat. Fir. Jack Clapp, developer of the proposed plat, explained that he now proposes to build one house on a 1.6 acre site and that this proposal would not necessitate lowering the ponding area. Mr. Arthur Oslund, a su-*eyor retained by lk. Clapp, explained that it is not proposed to put Evanswood Road thru at this time. .He suggested that a drainage and utility easement could be granted where the road would eventually be located and that when the property to the North is developed, the road could go thru. easement and said that if there was an overflow, it could go out thru a culvert across Blake Road, which culvert is three feet loner than the top of the proposed pond. Mr. Dunn said that the drainage problem could be solved temporarily by the culvert under Blake Road and that the Outlot could be a buildable lot if the sanitary sewer problem could be solved. In response to the contention of Mr. James C. Nystrom, 5225 Evanswood Lahe, that drainage water would be illegally diverted on to the property of someone else, Flr. Dunn said that he had reviewed the information furnished By lir. Clapp and that the pond would have a controlled elevation. Mayor Van Vallcenburg read from the Minutes of April 1, 1974, in which the hearing had been continued to this meeting so that the Engineering Department could make a further study of the area. a thorough study be made so that the matter could be discussed by all concerned. Elr. Dunn said that neigher the drainage solution or the sanitary sewer.which would be installed at this time tsl-thc permanent answer for the area. ated that the only answer would bz a complete study of storm sewer and sanitary sewer facilities for the entire area, but said that he did not believe that Bir. , Clapp should build on this lot until the complete system is installed. pointed out that there is no desire of residents,in the area to get into any long range planning on the use of their land. deny Hr. Clapp the right to build, there should be some plan in process which 170Uld eventually result in a removal of that denial. is a holding lot which is not a platted lot for purposes of building andiqhich would need a plat approval for building permit purposes. continual lack of an adequate drainage and sanitary sewer system is a problem which the Council should undertake to solve. llr. Erickson also suggested that he and-Mr, Dunn try to see if there is some solution whereby a portion of this pro- perty could be platted. Following considerable discussion, Councilman Courtney's motion vas seconded by Councilman Johnson an's, carried that this matter be placed in the hands of I4r. Dunn and 3Ir. Ericlcson to report back by July 1, 1974, with a plan that will solve this situation, with the understanding that Mr. Ericlisori advise the neighbors of their findings in writing so that they would have an opportunity to study the recommendations before the July 1, 1974, Council Neeting. Mr. Hyde recalled He suggested a ponding area to the East side of the Mr. Nystrom requested that He reiter- Mr. Hyde Eir. Erickson said that if Council should He clarified that an ''Outlot" He suggested that the RADIO EQUIPMENT BIDS CONTINUED TO JUNE 17, 1974. Dr. John DuBois from Hennepin County review the bids on radio equipment. Council- man Johnson thereupon mdeed that the bids be continued to June 17, 1974, as recom- mended by Mr. Dunn. GRADING IMPROVEMENT P-I?-2 BIDS CONTINUED TO JUNE 17, 1974. Dunn, Councilman Johnson',s motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and carried continuing award of bids for Grading Improvement P--2 to June 17, 1974. LOTS 12 AND .rt3, BLOCK 3, LA BUENA VISTA ADDITION LOT DIVISION HEARING DATE SET. As requested by Mr. Joe Brisbois, Councilman Shaw's motion setting hearing date for the division of Lots 12 and 13, Block 3, LaBuena Vista Addition, vas Mr. Dunn advised Council that Notion vas seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and carried. As recommended by Mr. I? I I 6/3/74 seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. HENNEPIN COUNTY REGISTERED LAND SURVEY GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL. being heard on the final approval of Hennepin County Registered Land Survey, Councilman Johnson offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: No objections RESOLUTION APPROVING J3EIWEPIN COUNTY REGISTERED LAND SURVEY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain Registered Land Survey, presented for approval by Hennepin County, covering property located generally South of Londonderry Road, East of County Road 18 and West of Lincoln Drive, and presented at the Edina City Council Meet- ing of June 3, 1974, be and is hereby granted final approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was' seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. HEARING DATES SET FOR PRELIMINARY PLATS. seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried, setting June 17, -1974, for Hearing Date for the following preliminary plats : Councilman Courtney's motion was 1. Oertel First Addition 2. Blake Ridge Addition 3. Indian Meadows 5GTH AND XERlIES STOP SIGNS DISCUSSED. Mr. Dunn advised Council that Hennepin County has agreed to the installation of either stop signs or signals at the intersection of W. 56th Street and Xerxes Avenue and that he is trying to get the City of Minneapolis to agree to installation of four-way stop signs. No action was taken. EDINA COURT PARKING CONTINUED TO JUNE 17, 1974. Upon the recommendation of Mr. Dunn, Councilman Johnson's motion continuing the Edina Court Parking discussion to June 17, 1974, was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. SALE OF OSCAR ROBERTS PROPERTY CONTINUED TO JUNE 17, 1974. Mr. Hyde advised Council of a new offer from Our Lady of Grace and also of a letter from Mrs. Helen Brooks, the real estate dealer representing Mr. LeRoy Balfanz, stating that Mr. Balfanz no longer had any interest in acquiring the property. Mr. Arnold Madigan a Trustee of the church said that the church wants the easement so that they can control the Balfanz property. Mr. Erickson recalled that he had told the Council that the City would either have to sell the gasement or extinguish it if the property is to be sold. He recalled that the easement runs through the middle of the Balfanz property with an alternate option on the owner of the Balfanz property to move it off to one side if they can provide the City another access along that one side. Mr. Erickson said that he had suggested the possibility that the church agEee to allow the City to control the easement even . 'though ehe City did not own it but that Mr. John Palmer had tejected the suggestion. Following considerable discussion, Councilman Johnson's motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried that the City Attorney study the purchase agree- ment and that the matter be continued to June 17, 1974. 7 I * FAIRVIEW-SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL FINANCING DISCUSSED. Mr. Hyde referred to a meeting betweeniHayor'Yan Valkenburg, Councilman Shaw, Mr. Dalen and himself with representatives of Fairview Hospital including Messrs. Vegmiller and Opheim from the hospital, an official of Juran and Moody, and Messrs. Arthur l?hitney and C. D. Mahoney, Jr., of the Dorsey firm and that, as a result of that meeting, the following matters are still unresolved: 1. 2. 3. 4. Is there any problem of church-state separation legality? Can a satisfactory second mortgage on the Edina property be secured by the City to safegnard its interests? How shall the City secure independent bond counsel, in view of the fact that the Dorsey firm serves both Fairview and the City? Should the eity have representation on the Hospital Association Board of Directors? Mayar Van Valkenburg said that he is in favor of the general proposal but said that he thinks that Council should have representation and set out guidelines for its consideration. He also said that he thought that outside independent counsel should be oBtained. is approximately $$;500,000 and that the Board could consider the City's.request to have somebody on the Board of Directors. hospital would seek separate counsel also if that would expedite the matter. Following some discussion, Councilman Johnson's motion was seconded by Cauncil; man Shaw and carried that the Mayor select and retain outside counsel to repre- sent the City in this matter. Mr. Wegmiller said that the request for financing Mlj:.Wegmiller also said that the 6/3/74 SOUTHDALE BOWLING LANES' LICENSES CONTINUED TO JUNE 17, 1974. As recommended by Mr. Hyde, Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried, continuing the matter of Southdale Bowling Lanes' licenses to June 17, 1974. STATE 3zuNICIPAL LEAGUE MENBERSHIP CONTINUED TO JUNE 17, 1974. As recommended by Mr. Hyde, Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried, continuing the matter of membership in the League of Minnesota Nunicipalities to June 17, 1974. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT PROPOSED BUS ROUTE APPROVED UNTIL RECEIPT OF TWELVE MONTH REPORT. like concurrence on iks proposal in connection with the Hennepin County Route Ridership Emprovement Project to extend Route 36 (formerly known as the St. Louis Park Crosstown Route) from its present termination on 44th and \?ooddale. Avenue to the Southdale Shopping Center. Councilman Courtney's motion was then seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried approviyg the route, but limiting approval to the' receipt of the M.T.C. report which will be submitted after the route has been in existence for twelve months. I Mr. Hyde advised Council that the Netropolitan Transit Commission would H,R.A. ADVISORY BOARD APPOINTMENT CONSIDERED. Nayor Van Valkenburg recalled that the H.R.A. had indicated that. it wants to send out 1,000 'letters to see who aould .like to serve on an advisory board, which letters would go out to the Country Club area. Concensus of Council was that ,a costly mailing should be avoided and that the H.R.A. should use the Edina Sun and contact neighborhood and business groups .to obtain nominees for the H.R.A. Advisory Board. ORDINANCE NO. 321-A1 GRANTED SECOND READING. No, 321-A1 for Second Reading and moved ifs adoption: Councilman Johnson offered Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 321-A1 321 TO REGULATE THE J.U3EPING OF BIRDS ON RESZDENTIAL PREIIISES AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 2.of Ordinance No. 321 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 2, Keeping of Certain Animals Regulated. No person.shal1 keep any , rabbits, mice, hamsters, guinea pigs or other rodents, or any bird on any premises used for residential purposes except in a metal cage so constructed . that-it may be completely and easily cleaned and that the animal or animals kept therein are completely enclosed and protected from small children and animals on the outside. Such animals at all times shall be kept within the dwelling or an assessory building as defined in Ordinance No. 811." Sec. 2. I This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon iks passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and th ATTEST : L??- k. City Clerk HUNJER DAY IN HENNEPIN COUNTY ENDORSED. of the following resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, many citizens of Hennepin County are in immediate need of emergency food services; and WHEREAS, ten major distribution centers are established to meet emergency food needs; and \?HEREAS, the ever increasing costs of medical services, food and clothing, when coupled with rising inflation and inadequate social security add tremendous burdens to our less fortunate citizens; and VHEREAS, EhSZd food shelves are in desperate need of replenishment; NOV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the &yor and Council of the City of Edina joins the County Board of Hennepin County in declaring that June 16, 1974, be designated "Hunger Day Hennepin County"; and . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council strongly encourage all seg- ments of the citizenry to assist the Ninneapolis Urban Coalition in the collect- ion of food and financial commitments to replenish this vitally important resource which many citizens so desperately need. cilman Johnson's motion for adoption IXE SOLUTION 6/3/74 w cia TJORKNEN'S COMPENSATION RATES TO BE OBTAINED FOR COUNCIL COVERAGE. Mr. Dalen recommended that Council be covered by FJorlcmen' s Compensation, whereupon Mr . Dalen was instructed to get information on the rates and report back to the Council by motion of Councilman Courtney, seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. LIQUOR FUND AS OF APRIL 30, 1974, was presented by Mr. Dalen, approved and ordered placed on file by motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. BID LET FOR LANDSCAPING IN FRONT OF COUNCIL CHAMBERS. tion of two bids taken informally for landscaping in front of the Council' chambers, and for the sidewalk to the Northeast of che tIity.E&Jl. showed Walter Carlson & Sons low bidder at $3,433.50 against bid of Marvin Air0 for $3,533.34. Councilman Shaw's motion awarding bid to recommended low bidder, Walter Carlson & Sons, was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. Mr. Hyde presented tabula- Tabulation BID LET FOR EARTH PmPAPATION FOR TENNIS COURTS AT DIVISION AND RUTLEDGE PARK. Mr, Hyde presented three quotations for earth work to be done in preparation for construction of tennis courts at Division and Rutledge Park showing Natt: Bullock Contracting low bidder at $3,5GO.OO,.J. A. Danens at $5,000,00 and Terry Brothers, Inc., at, $4,400.00. recommended low bidder, Matt Bullock Contracting, was seconded by Councilman Johnson and carried. Councilman Shawls motion awarding bid to BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR VARIOUS IFPROVEMENTS. As recommended by Mr. Dunn, Council- man Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOB PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR T.JATEP\MAIN _1 IMPROVEM3NT NO 1IM-288 GMDING & GRAVELING IBPROVEMEMT NO. C-116 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEFENTS NOS. SS-313, SS-314, SS-315 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. ST.S-137 AND ST.S-139 PERMANENT STREET SUWACING , CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER & SIDEI?ALK NO. BA-182 BITUMINOUS IEDIAW CUTS IMPROVEMENT NO. A-173 CONCRJ3TE REPLACEPENT 1974 THIN BITUBIINOUS OVERLAY BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofsre prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun 'and Construction Bulletin the following notice for bids for improvements: I (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS PERMANENT STREET SUWACING IMPROVEmNT NO. BA-182 BITUMINOUS MEDIAN CUTS IMPROVEMENT NO. A- 17 3 CONCRETE REPLACEMENT 1974 THIN BLTUMINOUS OVERLAY CONCEETE CURB & GUTTER & SIDEWALK CONTRACT ij74-5 (ENG) BIDS CLOSE JUNE 28, 1974 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in the Edina City Hall, 480111. 50th Street, at 11:OO a.m., Friday, June 28, 1974, and Edina City Council will meet at 7:OO p.m., Monday, July 1, 1974, to consider said bids for the construction of Permanent Street Surfacing, Concrete Curb & Gutter, Side- walk, Bituminous Median Cuts, Concrete Replacement and Thin Bituminous Overlay. The following are approximate quantities of major items: 1200 L/F, Storm Sewer 12"-27" R.C.P. , 15"-36" C.M.P. S/Y, Concrete Replacement, 6" & 8" Thickness 1900 Tons, Bituminous Paving, MHD 2331 & MHD 2341 2250 Tons, Class 5 Gravel 2694 Tons, Class 3 Gravel 3000 L/F, BG-18 Curb and'Gutter 7900 X/F, 4'l Thick Concrete Sidewalk 550 I ' 1700 Tons, MHD 2361 Bituminous Overlay Material Bid i shall be in a covered by the bid. 6/3/74 paled envelop with a statement thereon showing the work Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the 4801 187. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted person- ally to the City Engineer. mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and specifica- tions with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accom- %anied by cash deposit, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid. Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 I The City Florence B. Hallberg City Clerk (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, 2.IINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS SANITARY SEWERS IM?ROVEMENT NO. s s - 3 13 IMPROVEMENT NO: SS-314 IMPROVEMENT NO.' SS-315 TJATERBlAIN IMPROVEEENT NO. l?M-288 GRADING & GRAVELING IBPROVEtENT NO. C- 116 STORM SEWERS INPROVEBENT NO. ST. S-137 INPROVEbBNT NO. ST. S-139 CONTRACT #74-4 (ENG) BIDS CLOSE JUNE 14, 1974 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened' in the Council Chambers in the Edina City Hall, 48011~7. 50th Street, at 11:OO a.m., Friday, June 14, 1974, and Edina City Council will meet at 7:OO p.m., Monday, June 17, 1974, to consider said bids for the construction of Sanitary Sewers, Water Main, Grading and Graveling & Stom Sewers. I The following are approximate quantities of major items : SANITARY SEVER - II+lPROVEI*lENT NO. SS-313 1,505 L/P, 12" D.I.P. Sanitary Sewer, 8-23' Depth 8 Each, Standard Manholes 265 440 Tons, Bituminous Surfacing L/F, 24" Steel Casing Augered 1,100 SJY, Sod SANITARY SEWERS - INPROVE~IENT NOS. SS-314 & SS-315 WATER*lAIN - II*E'ROVEMENT NO. \?M-288 GRADING Sr GRAVELING - DPROVEMENT NO. C-116 STOREi SEWERS - 124PROVEMENT NOS. ST.S-137 & ST.S.-139 1,350 L/F, 12" R.C.P. Sanitary Sewer 2,057 L/F, 8" V.C.P. Sanitary Sewer 19 Each, Standard Manholes 3,480 L/F, 12" D.I.P. Water Main 8 Each, Standard Hydrants 9,700 CIY, Common Excavation 36,000 C/Y, Muck Excavation 70,900 C/Y , Select Granular Borrow 3,200 Tons, Class 3 Aggregate 2,200 Tons, Class 5 Aggregate 3,000 L/F, 36" thru 12" R.C.P. Storm Sever Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 480111. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424, and may be mailed or sub- mitted personally to the City Engineer. either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiv- ing them may be returned unopened. Vorlc must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and specifica- tions with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by cash deposit, bid.bond or certified check payable to the City Bids received by the City Engineer, - Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 . I 6/3/74 i Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid. City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. The Florence B. Hallberg City Clerk llotion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the resolution was adopted. CLAIMS PAID. and carried for payment of the folloying claims as per Pre-List: Revenue Sharing, $32,929,30; ConstrucGion, $127.28; Park Funds, $7,045.35; l?ater Fund, $6,285.76; Liquor Fund, $70,108.28; Sewer Fund, $42,318.07; PIR & Poor, $76.80; Total, $258,890.84. Motion of Councilman Courtney was seconded by Councilman Johnson General & The agenda's business having been covered, Councilman Johnson's motion for adjournment was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. p .m. Adjournment at 11:55 ,