Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19770718_regularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR NEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 18, 1977 Answering rollcall were members Richards, Schmidt, Shaw and Courtney who served as Mayor Pro Tem in the absence of Mayor Van Valkenburg. MINUTES of the Regular Neeting of July 11 and the Special Meeting of July 13, 1977, were approved as presented by motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Ayes : Nays: Eone Motion carried. Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON NTJMEROUS ASSESSMENTS. sented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Affidavits of Notice were pre- Pursuant to due notice given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter set forth : A. STREET IMPROVE>IENT NO. BA-213 IN THE FOLLOWING: Mr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $88,407.56, proposed to be assessed against 6014.12 assessable feet at a cost of $14.70 per assessable foot, against estimated assessment of $19.03 per assessable foot. Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) Xerxes Avenue from N. 66th Street to Washburn Circle No objections were heard and none had been received prior hereto. (See B. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. UM-301 IN THE FOLLOT?ING: Easement line West 75th Street and West 74th Street from York Avenue to York Terrace; York Terrace from West 74th street to West 75th Street Easement line from West 74th Street to West 75th Street between Xerxes Avenue and York Terrace Watermain Improvement No. WN-301 and Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-330 Xr. Hyde C. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-330 IN THE FOLLOWING: affecting the same properties, hearings were conducted concurrently. presented Analysis of Assessment for Watermain Improvement No. WM-301 showing total construction cost at $22,755.95, proposed to be assessed against 7 assessable lots at $2,798.15 per assessable unit, against proposed assessment of $3,250.85. Mr. Eyrie then presented the Xmprovement Number SS-330 shoving total construction cost of $23,889.39, proposed to be assessed against 7 assessable lots at $3,412.77 per assessable lot, against estimaLed assessment of $1,906.94 per assessable lot. Mr. Dunn explained that he had heard no comment from the neighbors as to whether property owners wished to have a ten or twenty year assessment and explained also that the proposed assess- -mat is higher than the estimate primarily because six out of-seven property owners indicated that they preferred to have the pipe for the sanitary sewer run down their rear lot lines. ment with the understanding that letters be sent to all affected property owners asking whether or not a twenty year assessment was preferable to a ten year assess- ment, was seconded by Councilman Richards and unanimously carried. in the meeting,. Mr. Wayne Sanders, 6217 Ashcroft Lane, oiarner of 7425 York Terrace, referred to a letter dated May 14, 1977, which had been sent out by J4r. Dunn which letter indicated that residents could save $1,293 by putting the sewer and water in front of the houses. Mr. Sanders said that at that time he had asked EIr. Dunn to contact him before deciding on where the pipes should be placed. replied that he had not contacted Mr. Sanders further inasmuch as the owners of the other six properties had indicated their desire to have the improvements put in the back yards. Mr. Sanders also indicated that he would prefer to have the improvements assessed over twenty years. Sanders that he should contact the Council by letter if he had any other sug- gestions as to how the improvement could be assessed (other than paying for it from General Funds) and recalled that the matter had already been continued to August 15,1977, so that residents will have an opportunity to respond to the letter asking whether the assessments should run for ten or twenty years. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) D. STREET INPROVEMENT NO. C-120 IN THE FOLLOWING: I Analysis of Assessment for Sanitary Sexar' Councilman Shaw's motion authorizing Resolution Ordering Improve- Later Nr. Dunn Mayor Pro Tem Courtney told Nr. I West Highwood Drive from Blake Road East to cul-de-sac Mr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $1,216.25, proposed to be assessed against one lot at $1,216.25 per lot against estimated assessment of $i,218.57 per assessable lot. No objections were heard sild none had been received prior hereto. later in qnutes.) (See Resolucion Ordering Assessment E. STORM SEIGR IMPROVEMENT-NO. ST.S-147 IN THE FOLLOWING: West Highwood Drive from 269 feet East of Blake Road to Nirror Lake Mr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at 7/13/77 217 I I ! $10,119.36, proposed to be assessed against eight assessable lots at $1,264.92 per lot against estimated assessment of $1,134.41 per assessable lot. ions were heard and none had been received prior hereto, Assessment later in Minutes.) No object- (See Resolution Ordering F. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-328 IN THE FOLLOWING: Whiteman Addition, Lot 6, Block 1 Mr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $1,573.37, proposed to be assessed against one assessable lot at $1,573.37, no pro- posed assessment haying been submitted. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in minutes. ) G. WATERWIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-302 IN THE FOLLOWING: West Highwood Drive from Blake Road to cul-de-sac at existing West Highwood Drive f: North of Pine Grove Road Mr. Hyde presented Anlysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $2,942.76, proposed to be assessed against two assessable lots at $1,71.38 against estimated assessment of $1,645.34 per lot. H. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-317-A IN THE FOLLOWING: Easement line from Lot 5, Block 1, Whiteman Addition, to South of cul-de-sac on West Eighwood Drive Mr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $3,848.32, proposed to be assessed against 14 assessable lots at $274.88 per lot against estimated assessment of $363.16 per assessable lot. raised and none had Seen received prior thereto. No objections were m m a a. (See Resolution Ordering Assess- I\ ment later in Minutes.) a I. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-327 IN THE FOLLOWING: Blake Road from 250 feet North of the South line of Brownswood Addition to 319 feet North Pk. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $4,656.56, proposed to be assessed against two connections at $2,328.28 per con- nection against estimated assessment of $3,271.51. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) . J. ORNAMENTN, STREET LIGHTS NO. L-16 IN THE FOLLOWING: Clover rCidge Addition Mr. Hyde presented Analysis oE Assessment showing total construction cost of $73.25, proposed to be assessed against four lots at $18.32 per assessable lot against escimated assessment of $62.75 per lot. received prior thereto. No objections were heard an.d none had been (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) K. STRKET IMPROVEMENT NO. C-118 IN THE FOLLOWING: Oak Lane from Grove Street SGuth to cul-de-sac Oak Lane from Grove Street South to cul-de-sac Oak Lane from Grove Street South to cul-de-sac Oak Lane from Grove Street South to cul-de-sac L. STORM SEWER XMPROVEMENT NO. SS-146 IN THE FOLLOWING M. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-326 IN THE FOLLOWING: N. WATEKMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-297 IN THE FOLLOWING: Street Improvement No. C-118, Storm Sewer Improvement No. SS-146, Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-326 and Watermain Improvement No. WM-297 being assessed against the same properties, public hearings were conducted concurrently. Mr. Hyde pre- sented Analysis of Assessment for Street Improvement No. C-118 showing total con- struction cost at $3,137.13, proposed to be assessed against 2 2/3 assessable lots at $1,176.41 per lot against estimated assessment of $949.46 per assessable lot. He presented Analysis of Assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. ST.S-146 show- ing total construction cost at $1,441.24, proposed to be assessed against 4 assess- able lots at $360.31 per lot, against estimated assessment of $549.08 per lot. Analysis of Assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. 326 showed total con- struction cost of $5,750.01, proposed to be assessed against three assessable lots at $1,916.67, against estimated assessment of $1,606.43. Analysis of Assessment for Watermain Improvement No. \!I-297 showed total construction cost at $6,056.40, proposed eo be assessed against three lots at $2,018.80 per assessable lot against estimated assessment of $1,872.80 per lot. Mr. Marvin Felderman, 5515 Grove St., advised that he had paid the improvements in escrow at the time he purchased his house and objected that he had not received,a notice of hearing for the improve- ments. Mr. Dunn explained that the hearings for grading, storm sewer and watermain were conducted in August, 1975 by petition of the developer as a condition of the plat and that they should have been included in a search at the time Mr. Felderman purchased his property. to having the street surfaced. mine 13 to 14 feet on ta hCs kroperty. if an error had been made in the location of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Felderman was then advised that the pile of dirt in front of a house under construction on Lot 2 would be levelled. temporary because Oak Lane may be extended at some future time. Mr. Felderman said that both he and a neighbor objected Be also complained tkt the cul-de-sac infringed Mr. Dunn said that he would check to set? Mr. Hyde explained that the cul-de-sac on Oak Lane is only No further 7/18/77 L 218 objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. Ordering Assessment later in Minutes .) (See Resolution 0. STREET IPPROVEMENT NO. C-121 IN THE FOLLOWING: IIalibu Drive in Edina Green Mr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment shoving total construction cost at $9,708.96, proposed to be assessed against 16 assessable lots at $606.81 per lot, against estimated assessment of $597.12 per lot. had been received prior thereto. Minutes .) No objections were heard and none (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in P. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S-148 IN THE FOLLOWING: Malibu Drive and easements in Edina Green Addition Nr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $13,853.64, proposed to be assessed against 17 lots at $814.92, against estimated cost of $411.75 per lot. Mr. Dunn explained that this assessment was higher than the estimate because additional pipes were needed to drain back yards in the area. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) (See Resolution Q. SANITAR‘4I SEWER IBPflOVENENT NO. SS-331 IN THE FOLLOWING: Malibu Drive in Edina Green Mr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $24,297.04, proposed to be assessed against 18 lots at $1,349.84 per assessable lot against estimated assessment of $1,132.64 per lot (based on 23 lots). objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. Ordering Assessment later in Iriinuges.) No (See Resolution - R. WATERMAIN IMPROVEPENT NO. T?M-303 IN THE FOLLOWING: Malibu Drive, Lincoln Drive and easements in Edina Green Mr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $34,280.16, proposed to be assessed against one connection in the Planned Industrial District at $3,066.12 per assessable lot and against 17 residential connections at $1,836.12 per assessable lot. Industrial-District connection at $3,496.30 per lot and at $1,176.14 per connection for 22 residentiallots. thereto. Estimated assessments were given for the Planned * No objections were heard and none had been received prior (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) S. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEPENT NO. SS-336 IN THE FOLLOWING: Deer Run Addition Nr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total estimated construction cost at $1,070.1.1, proposed to be assessed against one assessable lot at $1,070.11. estimated assessment was given. Minutes .) No (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in T. WATEREIAIN IMPROVENENT NO. WM-312 IN THE FOLLOWING: Deer Run Addition ’Xr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $1,070.11, proposed to be assessed against one lot. this improvement. No objections were given and none had been received prior thereto. No estimate was given for (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) U. SANITARY SEWER IEPROVEi’ENT NO. SS-307 IN THE FOLLOWING: West Frontage Road T.H. 100 from Normandale Court to 360’ South Hr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $7,058.36, proposed to be assessed against 3 connections at $2,352.79 and to be certified to the Hennepin County Land Commissioner. none had been received prior thereto. in Ninutes.) No objections were heard aod (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later V. WATERMAIN IMPROVEbENT NO. TJM-281 IN THE FOLLOWING: West Frontage Road of T.H. 100 from Normandale Court to 470’ South Nr. Hyde presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $7,902.31, proposed to be assessed against 3 connections at $2,634.10 per con- nection and to be certified to the Hannepin County Land Commissioner. ions were heard and none had been received prior thereto. upon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: No object- Councilman Shaw there- ESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF STREET IBlPROVEbENTS NOS. BA-213, C-118, C-120, c-121 WATERMAIN IEPROVl3lENTS NOS. m1-281 , \?hi-297 , mi-30 1 , FJM-302 , ITM-303, WN-312 STORE1 SEWER I&PROVEE€ENTS NOS. ST.S-146, ST.S-147, ST.S-148 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVDIENTS NOS. SS-307, SS-317-A, SS-326, SS-327, SS-328, SS-33Q ORNAEIENTAL LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-16 SS-331 AND SS-336 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. assessment rolls for the improvenients he’reinnfter referred to, and at such hearings held on July 18, 1977, has considered all oral and written objections presented against the levy of such assessments. The City has given nocice oi hearings as required bq lav wr thc proposed 71 18/77 I 2. Subject to the amendments made in paragraph 3 of this resolution, each of the assessments as set Eorth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for the following improvements : Street Improvements Nos. BA-213, C-118, C-120, C-121, Watermain Improvements Nos. \?I4-281, WM-297, WM-301, Wiq-302, MY-303, WN-312, Storm Sewer Improvements Nos. ST.S-146, ST.S-147, ST.S-148, Ornamental Street Light- ing Improvement No. L-16 , Sanitary Sewer Inlprovenients Nos. SS-307 , SS-317-A, SS-326, SS-327, SS-328, SS-330, SS-331 arid 58-336 does not exceed the local benefits con- ferred by said improvements upon the lot, tract or parcel of land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective improvements to be spread against the benefited lots, parcels and tracts of land described therein. 3. 301 are hereby continued until August 15, 1977, to determine the nuniber of years over which the assessments are to be paid and for final resolution of adoption and confirmation of the assessments for those two improvements. 4. installments, together with interest at the rate of 5% per annum on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 3, 1977 (except for the determination of the number of years and the possible reduction in the assessment for Sanitary Sewer No. SS-330 and Watermain No. WM-301, which hearings have been continued to August 15, 1977) to be payable with the general taxes payable in 1978. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: 1 Hearings for the assessments for Sanitary Sewer No. SS-330 and Watermain No. VM- The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of said . Improvement No. Street Improvement No. BA-213 Installments Inte.rest Rate 10 5% Watermain Improvement No. WM-30 1. To be determined 5% Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-330 To be determined 5% Street Improvement No. C-120 3 5% Storm Sewer Improvement No. ST.S-147 3 5% S.anitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-328 3 5% Watermain Improvement No. WM-302 3 5% Saqitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-317-A 10 5% Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-327 3 5% Street Lighting Improvement No. L-16 1 5% Street Improvement No. C-118 3 5% Storm Sewer Improvement No. ST.S-146 3 5% Sanitary Sewer 1mp.rovement No. SS-326 3 5% Watermain Improvement No. WM-297 3 5% Street Improvement No. C-121 3 5% -- Storm Sewer Improvement No. ST.S-148 3 5% Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-331 3 5% Watermain Improvement No. WM-303 3 5% Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-336 10 5% Watermain Improvement No. WM-312 10 5% Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-307 10 5% Watermain Improvement No. WM-281 10 5% 5. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution. 6. The Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessments which may be payable by a county, by a political subdivision or by the owner of any right of way, as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said section. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Ro 11 call : Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw Nays: None Resolution adopted. MARK NELSON FIRST ADDITION GRANTED FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Mr. Hughes recalled that the rezoning of property at 4536 France Ave. S. from R-1 Residential District to Office District 0-1 had been contingent upon approval of final plat of Mark Nelson First Addition and that publication of Ordinance No. 188-A72 had been with- held pending approval of the plat. He presented Mark Nelson First Addition for final approval, advising that all ordinance requirements had now been met. No objections having been heard, Councilwoman Schmidt offered the following resol- ?.tor! arid moved its adctJL’ LO11 r RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF MARK NELSON PLRST ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City o€ Edina, Minnesota, that that 7/18/77 certah plat entitled "Nark Nelson First Addition", platted by the Estate of Grace Pf. Swanson, Jerome G. Raidt , Administrator, and Florence M. Stucki, widow, and Farmers and Mechanics Savings Bank of Minneapolis , a corporation, and presented at the Edina City Council Heeting of July 18, 1977, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Notion for adoptioil of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Sliaw. Rollcall : Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw Nays: None Resolution adopted. J&ES k. WILSON'S FIRST ADDITION GRANTED FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. Mr. Hughes that all requirements have been met for final approval of James M. Wilson's First Addition, Councilwoman Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Being advised by - RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF JAMES Ef. WILSON'S FIRST ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that that certain plat entitled ''James M. Wilson's Firsi Additioni1, platted by James EL Wl- son and Carolyn S. TJilson, husband and wife, and presented at the Edina City Council Xeeting of July 18, 1977, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion €or adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Shaw. Rollcall : Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw Nays: Wone Resolution adopted. BP3DESEN PARK/EfLJD LAKE DEVELOPMENT PETITIONED. requesting the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to undertake the total remaining development of Mud Lake/Bredesen Park in accordance with studies made over the past several years as recommended by the Environmental Quality Commission and the Park Board-. I&. Hughes referred to his memo to the Council which recalled that the Watershed District has adopted the following policy regarding the financing of petition projects: 1) 100% funding of water storage and management facilities (Pond excavation, dikes, outlets, control structures); 2) 50% funding of enhancement of waters and related lands (trails fencing, signs, benches, etc.) ; 3) 25% funding for acquisition of flood plain lands. zeed for protecting and enhancing the water storage capabilities of the site so as to minimize dotmstream flooding and erosion problems and to enhance the scenic, recreational and wildlife assets of the area. Estimated cost of the Bredesen Park/Mud Lake Wzter Msnagement Project within the City was given at $500,000, nost of which will be assumed by the watershed district. the City has already spent over $500,000 for land acquisition and studies. No further discussion being heard, Councilman Shaw offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RE SOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby petition the Nine Mile Creek Watershed pistrict to review and authorize final plans for the Bredesen Park/ Mud Lake Water Management Project and that the cost of the project be financed in the manner provided by Biinnesota Statutes 112.61, Subdivision 3. Notion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Mr . Hughes presented a petition Recognltion was made of the It was brought out that Rollcall : Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Shaw Nays: None Abstaining: Resolution adopted. Richards, because of a possible conflict of interest. SIDEWALK IEPROVENENTS NOS. S-21 AND S-22 BIDS AWARDED. Nr. Hyde presented tabula- tion of two-bids for Sidewalk Improvements Nos. S-21 and S-22, advising that the cost of these improvements is to be paid from State Aid fimds. Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc., low bidder at $59,445.56 and Concrete Curb Co. at $69,418.20, against Engineer's estimate of $50,735.80. for award to recommended low bidder, Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc., was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. I Tabulation showed Councilman Richards' motion Ayes : Nays: None Motion carried. Courtney, Richards , Schmidt , Shaw RAWWORST CORPO&TION ZOYTW BE??INC --- PATE SET. a letter from Rauenhorst Corporation requesting that a hearing date be set by Counc'l 's fittation was called to Council to consider their request to rezone and subdivide the tract of land in the Northwest quadrant of France Ave. and W. 76th Street for restauract use. Couucll- 7/18/77 .- 221 lnan Richards' motion setting hearing date for August 15, 1977, was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Ayes : Courtney, Richards, Schmidt , Shaw Nays: None Mot ion carried. TMPPIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JULY 12, 1977, APPROVED. Councilman Sliaw's motion that Sections B and C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 12, 1977, be accepted and that the following action of the committee be approved, was seconded bv Councilwoman Schmidt: 1. That the hedge adjacent to STOP AHEAD sign at Belmore and Monroe for Eastbound Belrnore Lane be trimmed and the 24" STOP sign be replaced by a 30" STOP sign. 2. That a letter be written to the Minnesota Department of Transportation calling attention to the potential hazard at the Northbound Highway 100 off-ramp at Eden Ave., and requesting some additional delineation, signing, guard rail, or rumble strip which would serve as an additional warning. Motion for adoption of the motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw Nays: None Motion carried. ART CENTER EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AUTHORIZED. partment staff .of the Art Center had recommended the purchase of two Electric Crusader Kilns from Minnesota Clay Company at $626.00 each, along with 36 kiln shelves at $14 each and four post sets for a cost oE $115.00. Purchase of six additional Brent Pottery wheels for a- cost of $2,490 was also requested. man Richards' motion authorizing putchase from Minnesota Clay Company for a total cost of $4,364.00 was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Mr. Hyde advised that the Pottery De- . Council- Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw Nays: None Mot ion carried. It was brought out that this equipment is to be purchased from contributed funds and that, while other wheels were checked at other firms, the pottery staff feels that the Brent wheel and Crusader Kiln, available only from Minnesota Clay Company, were considered the best buy. --- LEVY LIMIT SEMINAR TO BE ATTENDED. semicar sponsmed by the Assaciatlon of Metropolitazz Mufiicipalities on "Levy Limits" will be held on August 1, 1977 at the St. Paul Civic Center. Mayor Pro Tern Courtney and members of the staff will attend. No action was taken. Council's attention was called to a special POLICE CONTRACT DEMANDS REVIEWED. Council's attention was called to a letter to M.B.M.A. from iennesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees Union Local 320 setting forth contract demands for 1978. No formal action was taken. TAX INCREBUXT TASK FORCE MEETING REPORT GIVEN. attended a meeting of mayors of municipalities involved with tax increment financ- ing which was sponsored by the League of Minnesota Cities, said meeting being held on July 15, 1977, at Alexandria, MN. He advised thae: the thrust of the session was to develop strategy for the next session of the legislature in connection with House File 1191 which pas'sed the House this year and which will be considered by the Sen- ate next year. No formal action was taken. Mr. Hyde reported that he had PUBLIC ROAD DEDICATION REQUIREMENT WHEN PROPERTY IS REPLATTED DISCUSSED. called Council's attention to a memo from Ms. Waelti as to whether it is legal to request additional dedication of a public road when property is replatted. IJaelti's memo indicated that, when property is replatted, it has the effect of erasing any governmental requests for dedication of property or other reasonable requests under the Trior plat and that, therefore, the request for a dedication for a public road is not construed to be an additisnal request. She summarized that she believes that it i.s safe to advise that a request for a public road dedi- cation is legal under either .the original plat or a subsequent replat. formal action was taken. Mr. Hyde Ms. No I CITY STAFF COMMENDED. witnessed John Olson working overtime to clean up a mess left by a contractor, and had witnessed Edina paramedics and two police officers as they worked to revive an electocution victim. He spoke also with praise of the band, the park crew, and the Fire Department and Police traffic direction at iile fireworks display at Corn- elia Park. Mr. Hyde advised that over the 4th of July weekend, he had 7/18/77 222 HEARING DATE SET FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. resolution and moved its adoption: Couiicilman Shaw offered the following FUSOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSPIENT HEARINGS FOR STREET INPROVEMENTS NOS. 1311-202 , BA-206 , BA-208, BA-212, BA-215 , BA-216 AND TJATEREIAIN INl?ROVE.EIENT NO. IJN-270 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, PLiniiesota, as foll.owS: 1. the improveaents set forth in the Notice of Hearing forms hereinafter recorded, and the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and parcels of land within the districts affected by said improvements, and said proposed assessments having been filed with the Clerlc, the same are hereby approved and the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open to public inspection pending hearings thereon as herein provided. 2. ing forms hereinafter contained, to pass upon said proposed assessments and the Clerk's action in publishing notices of said hearings in the official newspaper in accordance with law is hereby approved; Notices being as follows: The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of Hear- (Official Publication) HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ASSESSMENTS CITY OF EDINA STREET IMJ?ROVEKEL!iTS NOS. BA-202, BA-208, BA-212, BA-215; LA BA-216 AND 'NATERMAIN ?"ROVEMENT NO. I?M-270 EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Pfinnesota, on Monday, August 15, 1977, at 7:OO p.m., to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the following proposed assessments. These assessments are now on file in the office of the Edina City Clerk and open to public inspec- tion. a period of ten (10) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1978: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF STMET IMPROVEMENT NO, Bh-202 Assessments on the following will be payable in ten equal installments over Dovre Drive from parkwood Lane to Lincoln Drive The area proposed to be assessed includes Lot 1 and westerly 55 feet of Lot 2, Block 1; Lot 3 and Lot 2, except the westerly 55 feet thereof, Block 2; Lot 1 and Lot 2, except the east 60 feet thereof, Block 2; Lot 3 and east: Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 7, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 4; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 5; 'Lots 2 and 3, Block 6, Parkwood Knolls Addition. m'is 1 th-iu 9, Block 1; Lo% 1 thru 5, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 2nd Addition.' Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 3rd Addition, bts 1 thru 9, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 4th Addition. Lot 1, Biock 1; Lots 3 thru 12, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2; 'tots 1 and 2, Block 3, Parlcxood Knolls 5th Addition. Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 6th Addition. Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 2, Farkwood Knolls 7th Addition, Lots 1 thru 9, Block 1; Lots 13 thru 17, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 8th Addition. Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot 4, Parkwood Knolls 9th Addition, Lot 1, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 10th Addition. Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2; Luts 2 thru 8, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 4; Parkwood Knolls 11th Addition, Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 12th Addition, Lots 1 thru 12, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 10, Block 3; Lots L thru 5, Block 4, Lot 1, Block 5, Parkwood Knolls 13th Addition. Lot I, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3, Parkwood Knolls 14th Addition, Lots 1 thru 10, Block 1; Lot 1 Block 2, Lots 1 thru 8, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition. Lots 1 thru 13, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Parkwood Knolls' 16th Addition, Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 4, Parkwood Knolls 17th Addition. Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 4; Lots 1 thru 14, Block 5, Parkwood Knolls 19th Addition, Lots 1 thru 8, Block I; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2, Walnut Ridge 3rd Addition. Lots 1 thru 6, 3lcck 1; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2, Nalibu Heights Addition, Lots 1 thru 12, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3; Outlot A, and Parcel 9000, Edina Green Addition, All streets in Parkwood Knolls 19th Addition The area proposed to bc assessed includes Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1; Lots 1 a1.d 2, Block 2; Lots 1 tiiiu 4, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 12, Liuck 4, Lots 1 thru 14, Block 5, Parkwood Knolls 29th Addition I 60 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, Nir-e Mile North 2nd Addition, Lot: 1, 310ck 1; 2. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IEIPROVENENT NO, BA-206 223 3 . CONSTRUCTEOPI OF STREET IFZROVEXEXI! NO BA-208 Lanham Lane from South line of M. P, Johnson8s Prospect Hills 3rd Addition to Pleetwosd Drtve The arcti proposed to be assessed includes Lot 3, Block 1; Lot 1, Block 3; Me Po Johnsonfs Prospect Hills Addition, Lots 1 thru 10, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2, M. Po Johnson’s Prospect Hills 3rd Addition Dale Avenue from West 56th Street to I.Jest 57th Street The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 1 thru 4$ Block 1; and Lot 5 and Eorth half of Vacated Street, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 3, Nelody Knolls 6Ch Addition; Lot 2, Block 5, Melody Knolls 3rd Addition McCauley Terrace from 24cCauley Trail East to cul-de-sac The area proposed to be assessed includes Lot 2, Block 1, and Outlot A, McCauley Heights 4th Addition. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and Outlot A, tlcCauley Heights 5th Addition c‘w 4- hc Glasgow Drive from Vest 78th Street to cul-de-sac The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 5. thru 7, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2, Heath Glen Addition Easement line from Fabri-Tek Lnc. to Lincoln Drive at South line of Nine Mile Biorth Additi.on; Lincoln Drive from South line of Nine Mile North Addition to North line of Don-Car properties; Lincoln Drive from Londonderry Drive to South line of Nine Mile North Addition The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lots t thru 6, Block 7, Lots 1 thru 6, Block 8; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 9; Also Outlscs B & D, Londonderry Addition. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Londonderry Replat, Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and Outlot A, Nine Mile North Addition, Lot 1 and Uest 55 feet of Lot 2; Lot 3 and Lot 2, except the 3qest 55 feet thereof, Block 1; bt 1 and Lot 2, except the East 60 Eeet thereof; Lot 3 and the East 60 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, Nine Mile North 2nd Addition. Parcels 4000 and 8000, Prestige 2nd Addition. Parcels 4030 and 4210, Section 31, Totmship 117, Range 23. (Now new plat Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition, Lots 13 thru 17, and Lots 21 thsu 27, Block 1). bts 1 thru 12, Block 1; Lots 7, thru 4, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3, Outlot A and Parcel 9000, Edina Green Addition. 4. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET 1i”IPROVEMXhT NO, BA-212 5. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-215 /qG Gd- -1 6. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-216 % 7, CONSTRUCTLOM OF WATEFJiAIN NO. 270 Fixst payment of these assessment will be payable with the taxes for the year 1977, collectible in 1975. interest at the same rate for one year on all unpeid installments. The owner of khe property assessed for the above improvements way pay the whole of the assessment without interest to the City Treasurer on or before November 15, 1977, or make payment with accrued interest to the County Treasurer. Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Elinnesota Statutes, Section 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within twenty (20) days after the adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District: Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. Pursuant to iSiinncsota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor’s office by the close of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in the first paragraph of this notice. and application forms, please call or visit the City Assessor’s office, BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUiKIL. To each subsequent installment will. be added For further information Florence B. Hallberg City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Rollcall : Ayes: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw Nays: None Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Councilman Shaw was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt for ?zyme;lt of the followf.,-.z CILI?XS per Pre-List: Generzl Fur.?, $253,667.61; Park Furi, $1,668.73; Swimming Pool, $4,521.74; Golf Course, $6,544.96; Recreation Center, $13,490.82; Gun Range, $11.59; Water Fund, $14,507.65; Sewer Fund, $72,346.88; 7/18/77 224 Liquor Fund, $177,696.96; Construction Fund, $439,038&44; Total, $983,495.38. Motion was seconded by Councilman Richards. Ayes : Courtney, Richards, Sclimi.dt, Shaw Nays: None Mot ion carried. No further business appearing, Councilman Richards' motion for adjournment was seconded by Councilwonlan Schmidt. Adjournment at 8:15 p.m.