HomeMy WebLinkAbout19800626_edina_board_of_review6/9/80
97
cu 0 03. -2 U a
Helen Brookman, 4708 Lakeview Dr.
Robert W. Nelson, 4717 W. 60th St.
Joseph J. Kopstein, 4740 W. 70th St.
Ronn Hechter, 6805 Creston Rd.
David R. Mulligan, 7128 Bristol Blvd.
Frederick Matthews, 5201 Benton Ave.
Craig Corah, 4420 Judson Lane
Mark Idilkins, 5919 Tracy Ave.
Richard Andreen, 6320 Ridgeview Dr.
Barbara K. Bundt, 5312 W. 64th St.
Byron H. Armstrong, 4119 W. 62nd St.
J. Thomas Parry, 5521 Mirror Lakes Dr.
Rita F. Conover, 308 John St.
Susan M. Ohman, 6212 Hansen Rd.
Calhoun Collectors Society, Inc., 7401
B.A.S.I.C. Properties . . ..
' Mrs. R. McDaniel, 5720 TJ. 70th St.
147,400
97,000
108 , 100
84 , 000
78,300
56 , 800
93,300
81,900
102,800
95,300
108 , 100
49,500
103,100 *
119,700
93 , 600
Cahill Rd. 796,000
220,000
No further business :.appearing, Mayor Van Valkenburg declared the meeting
adjourned at 6:35 p.m. and announced that the next meeting of the Board of
Review would be determined at the Council Meeting of June 16, 1980.
L- A- h,
City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE CONTINUED MEETING OF THE
EDINA BOARD OF REVIEW
HELD THURSDAY, JUNE 26, 1980, AT 4:OO P.M.
Answering rollcall for the continued meeting of the Board of Review were members
Bredesen , Courtney, Richards , .Schmidt and Mayor Van Valkenburg.
Mr. Johnson presented the objection of Bernard E. Johnsrud to the estimated
market value of $88,400 on his house at 6309 Tingdale Ave., based on the fact
that he has been unable to sell the house at a price near the Assessor's valu-':
ation.
The appeal of Mr. Leon Tichy, 7685 Parklawn Ave., was noted by the Board. Mr..
Tichy objected to the Assessor's estimated market value of $436,700, stating that
he believed the market value should be $355,000, based on a July 9, 1979, sale
and on an appraisal of the property showing an estimated value of $400,000.
Mr. Edward Harter, 5237 Meadow Ridge, advised the Board that he would be satis-
fied with the Assessor's revised estimated market value of his house at $74,000.
Councilwoman Schmidt's motion was then seconded by Councilman Bredesen, authoriz-
ing homesteads for Apartment Nos. 112, 212, 312, 120, 220 and 320, Edina West
Homesteads, because property otjners could not live in their homes on January l.,
1980, due to a December fire io the building.
Ayes : Bredesen, Courtney , Richards , Schmidt, Van Valkenbusg
Nays: None
Mot ion carried.
Councilman Richards ' motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney, accepting the
Assessor's recommendation for the reduction of the estimated market value for the
house at 4212 Scott Terrace, owned by Boyd Aldrich, from $81,600 to $71,000,
based on the reduction of estimated market value of .a similar house at 4023 Kip-
ling Ave.
'!
Ayes : Bredesen , Courtney , Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None *
' Bfotion carriea.
Councilwoman Schmidt's motion was then seconded by Councilman Bredesen approving
reduction of the following properties as recommended by the Assessor:
.. -
6/26/80
98
Name and Address
Earl Nelson, 4100 W. 76th St.
Helen K. Letson, 4505 Garrison Lane
Walter I. Sandison, 4612 W. 58th St. .
Murray S. Locke, 6601 Field Way
Lake West, 7701 York Ave.
Robert Savre, 62-12. Halifax Ave.
Kathryn Kjellsen, 4453 Ellsworth Dr.
S. V. Christenson, 6409 Glacier Place
. Robert Boran, 5805 Eastview Dr.
E. A; Harter, 5237 Meadow Ridge
Gerald C. Mohl, 6825 Sally Lane
I G. W. Hoogendorp, 6605 Nordic Dr.
Ray G. .DeMont, 6601 Nordic Dr.
Richard D. Stehley, 6621 Nordic Dr.
John Fagerstrom, 7005-07 McCauley Tr.
6909-11 McCauley T.r.
*. 6913-15 McCauley Tr..
William G. Bale, 5015-17 W. 44th St. '
Donald S. Oren, 5317 Hollywood Rd.
Gary Forsberg, 4513 Vandervork Ave.
Grant L. Martin, 4603 Merilane
Erhard H. Becker, 5305 Mirror Lakes Dr.
Deni Frandrup, 408 Harrison Ave.
William West, 5520 Warden Ave.
Glenn M. Champlin, Jr., 5524 Benton Ave. .
Ronald L. Lavine, 5224 Forslin Dr.
James L. Ekstrom, 4023 Kipling Ave.
Larry D. Douglas, 4016 Inglewood Ave.
&ye D. Perkins, 4705 Sunnyside Rd,
Helen Brookman, 4708'Lakeview Dr..
Robert W. Nelson,.4717 I?. 60th St.
Ronn Hechtes, 6805 Creston.Rd.
Fredrick Matthews, 5201 Benton Ave.
Craig Corah, 4420 Judson La.
Hark Nilkins, 5919 Tracy Ave.
Richard Andren, 6320 Ridgeview Dr.
Rita F. Conover, 308 John St.
John Ohman, 6212 Hansen Rd.
Calhoun Collector's, 7401,Cahill Rd.
Loen Tichy, 7685 Parklawn Ave. .
Ayes :
Nays: None
$io tion carried.
Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt,
PINS Number
31-028-24-41-0010
30-028-24-21-0017
19-028-24-24-0019
31-117-21-24-0081
32-028-24-34-0001
30-028-24-11-0062
31-028-24-24-0027
31-117-21-43-0071
33-117-21-31-0067
04-116-21-32-0065
06-116-21-33-0033
06-116-21-41-0030
06-116-21-41-0031
06-116-21-41-0026
37-116-21-22-0029
06-116-21-33-0042
06-116-21-33-0043
28-117-21-21-0003
28-117-21-23-0018
28-117-21-23-0063
29-117-21-12-0016
29-117-21-34-0031
30-117-21-21-0117
32-117-21-14-0022
32-117-21141-0035
33-117-21-33-0019
07-028-24-13-0022
07-028-24-14-0023
18-028-24-22-0068
19-028-24-22-0017
19-028-24-33-0049
30-028-24-34-0028
33-117-21-32-0013
30-028-24-34-0006
32-117-21-42-0063
05-116-21-11-0023
30-117-21-11-0033
05-116-21-11-0083
08-116-21-41-0013
31-028-24-43-0009
Van Valkenburg
Value
$3537E
84,000
71,500 .
228,700
610,000
92 y 200 I 83 , 100
135,800
94,000 .
74,000
100,500
99 , 000
96,000
112,000
192,000
195,000 ' .
I. 197,000.
155,000
93 , 000
72,500
176,000
95,000 .
78 500
84,500 ,
99,000
125 , 000
68,200
86,000
135,000
127 , 000 .
92,000 I $ 82,500
53,700
94,000
90 , 000
85,000
112,000
87 , 000
756,000
380,000
The Mayor then declared the Board of Review for 1980 adjourned.
5:15 P.M.
Adjournment at
i In the Matter of the Petition of
Laukka and Associates Inc. for a
Rezoning of Land Described as
Outlot B, Dewey Hill Second
Addition (2-79-12)
CITY ' OF EDINA
ADDENDUM
FINDINGS,
DECISIONS,
AND
REASONS
SUPPLEMENTARY FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The development of a ponding area on the Subject Property provides
a proper storm water retention and detention facility which conforms with the
water management plans and objectives of Edina and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed
District.
2. The arrangement and alignment of the condominium buidings proposed
by the PRD Rezoning regult in a reduction of adverse affects from 1-494 and
industrial uses to the south and an enhancement of the potential for solar energy
usage for the condominium buildings.
3. The proposed condominium buildings as viewed from the easterly and
westerly boundary of the Subject Property are approximately 35 feet in height.
Edina Ordinance Number 811, the Zoning Ordinance, allows single family dwellings
to be a maximum of 2% stories or 30 feet.
4. The purpose of the Planned Residential District Section of the
Zoning Ordinance is to enc0urag.e creativity, imagination, variation and flexibility
in the development of residential areas. Its basic characteristic is the
clustering of housing in an effort to preserve and protect natural amenities, to
provide large expanses of usable open space, to reduce development costs and yet
. to maintain single family densities within the overall Planned Residential District. '
.. =4
9 4 -1%~ purpose is to create a new 'high-quality, low-density residential environment
having a mixture'of housing $types in a functional and natural setting.
The objectives of the Planned Residential District Section of the
Zoning Ordinance are a) to encourage the provision of open space and recreational
facilities in conjunction with residential developments, b) to encourage
developers to use a more creative and imaginative approach in the development of
I
residential areas, c) to provide an enjoyable living environment by preserving
existing topography, stands of trees, ponds, flood plains and similar natural
assets, d) to encourage a variety of living environments and an agreeable mixture
of housing types, and e) to permit a degree of flexibility'in environmental
design which is not possible under current regulations.
5. Preliminary plans submitted in support of the PRD Rezoning propose
a "terraced"'bui1ding concept whereby the facade of the condominium buildings
step down to the ponding area on the Subject Property. These buildings would
. also have sloping roof lines, decks, and other residential amenities, Preliminary 8 plans note that proposed condominium units will range from 1,250 square feet to
2,700 square feet and will sell for $125,000 to $275,000.
6. Existing public services including public sanitary sewer facilities,
' public water facilities, roads and police and fire protection can accomodate
the proposed development without unusual or unexpected costs or
service levels.
reductions in
-2-
SUPPLEMENTARY REASONS FOR THE DECISION,TO
GRANT PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
A. Although detailed architectural plans have not been reviewed and
will not be considered until final approval pursuant to the Boning Ordinance,
preliminary plans propose a development which will be a high quality, luxury
class residential environment that will be a positive addition to the environs of
the Subject Property and the City of Edipa as a whole.
B. Preliminary plans illustrate a proper and desirable arrangement of
buildings on the Subject Property and respond to the external influences on the
site as well as. the physical constraints caused by topography, soils, and water
table.
C. The proposed height of the condominium buildings is not significantly
greater than the height presently allowed by the Zoning Ordinance for single
family dwellings. Therefore, the height of the buildings will not be unusual or
incompatible with surrounding developments.
D, The Proposed Rezoning will not substantially reduce the value of
surrounding properties or the Subject Property,
E. The proposed condominium buildings, as illustrated by the preliminary
plans, will be sympathetic in design to surrounding residential uses.
F. The Proposed Rezoning can be accomodated by existing public services
and will not cause over-loading or unusual or unexpected reduction of the level
of such services.
G. Development of the Subject Property with lower density residential
uses is economically unlikely due to the physical constraints inherent in and
imposed on the Subject Property.
-3-
H. The development of a pondipg area on the Subject Property is
desirable from a storm water management and aesthetic standpoint.
I. The Proposed Rezoning will allow a use, and the proposed condominium
buildings will be, compatible with surrounding uses.
-4-