Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19800707_regularMINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ' JULY 7, 1980. Answering rollcall were members Bredesen , Courtney , Richards , Schmidt and Mayor Van Valkenburg. Also present were Mmes. Leslie Turner and Betty Carver of the Human Relations Commission and Helen McClelland of the Community Development and Planning Commission. 99 MINUTES of June 16, 1980, were approved as submitted by motion of Councilwoman Schmidt , seconded by Councilman Courtney. Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. DEWEY HILL 111 ADDITION PRD-3 ZONING ORDINANCE GRANTED FIRST READING ON' 3-2 VOTE. Mr . Hughes recalled that the hearing on the".PRD-3 zoning request :for. Dewey Hill 111 had been continued from June 2, i980, and that supplementary Findings of Fact and Reasons had been distributed to the proponent and to neighbors for their review. A copy of said Findings of Fact 2nd Reasons are hereto attached and made a part of these Minutes. Mr. Larry Laukka, the developer, said that he had met on three different occasions with neighbors since the last Meeting in an attempt to work out their differences. Mr. Peter Jarvis , representing the developer, pre- sented overlays showing the site as presently graded and as the project will appear after final grading and landscaping with conifers in the 8 to 12 foot range, shade trees, ornamental trees andshrubs. Reference was made to the fact that Mr. Laukka had reduced the length of the Northerly building by 25 feet, reduced the height of . the Northerly building from 3 to 2 stories and reduced the total number of units from 123 to 114. Mr. Mitchell Kirchbaum, attorney representing Glasgow Drive residents, said that Mr. Laukka is evading the issue, inasmuch as the real issue is whether or not approval should be granted in the first place, the purpose of this meeting is to analyze the-application the Southwest Edina Plan, and to see if the Findings of Fact and Reasons support the Reasons for the rezoning. He pointed out that the Findings of .Fact and Reasons presented at tonight's meeting are called "supplementary" Findings which means that they must be read already been submitted. address the major issue of density, that the Finding which states that the proposed rezoning will not substantially reduce the value of surrounding properties is "pure speculation", that a multiple residence building cannot be "sympathetic in design" to single family dwellings, that lower density may not be "as profitable" rather than "economically unlikely", and that, single family uses to the North and East are not compatible with the proposed development. Mr. Hirchbaum submitted that the South" west Edina Plan is beir.g completely ignored in allowing the proposed density, that the Findings do not support the Reasons and that the Reasons do not support the conclusion that the development should be authorized. Mrs. Dominick Sciola, 7705 Glasgow Drive, objected that in no case has approval been given by Council allowing a higher density than that called for in the Southwest Edina Plan. In response to Mrs. Sciola's statement that the neighbors were in favor of the devel- oper's offer to eliminate the most Northerly building and make two single family lots at the end of Glasgow Drive, Mr. Laukka said that he had been groping for a satisfactory compromise, but that that solution would not be economically feasible. Mr. Brian Anderson, representing West Suburban Builders, said that Mr. Laukka had never addressed the concerns of residents on,the West side of the proposed development and that they still believe that the density is too great, even if the Northerly building should be replaced by two single family dwellings. He said that evidence has been submitted to the Council showing an "adverse impact" on the property values of single family lots on Shaughnessy Road and reminded Council that there is no berm.between properties on the.West and the parking lot and that all traffic will be using Shaughnessy Road. of Councilman Courtney, Mr. Laukka said that, while firm plans had not been drawn, landscaping on the West side of the site would be the same quality and have the same result as landscaping on the East side. Council that rezocing for the three story market rate apartment building at 51st and France Ave. was in a residential area also, with setbacks of less than 75 feet to the West and 40 feet to the South. Councilwoman Schmidt expressed . her concern that, in allowing the proposed development to be constructed, the Council is inviting other developers also to construct buildings of greater density than permitted under City ordinances. Mayor, Mr. Erickson said that in approving this proposal, the City would, in effect , be amending the Southwest Edina Plan to a higher density and that the only restriction on the Council's discretion as to density is the 12 units per cu 0 ffl -3 a .a He suggested that . in terms of density, in conjunction with the Findings of Fact and Reasons that have He objected that the FiFdings of Fact acd Reasons do not ' In response to a question Mr. Jarvis reminded In response to a question of the 7/7/80 acre set out in the PRD-3 zoning. Council at this time is whether the proposed rezoning has a rational basis related to the promotion of the general welfare and that, on this basis, he disagrees with Mr, Kirchbaum that, while the density question is one aspect of the rezoning, the real question is one of general welfare. He said that if the Council decides there is a basis in the attached Reasons and Findings for deciding that the general welfare is served by this rezoning, then he believes that the Council has the authority to grant the'rezoning and that it would be upheld in Court. the Findings and Reasons rela.te to the general welfare of which density is but one element. He stated that the Findings and Decisions cover heights, surround- ing uses, effect on public services, arrangement and alignment of buildings, types (which is fostered by both the Plan and by ordinance) and that he believed that every conceivable aspect of the development has been studied by the City. He said that he believes that Councils should listen to neighbors and that the Courts have also said that Councils should listen to neighbors, but that the Courts have also said that neighbors cannot be used as the "base line" for a decision 2nd if the general wel-fare goes against what the neighbors wish, it is Council's decision to make. already been done on the site. issued pursuant to the grading plan as authorized by the Council at its meeting of February 25, 1980. Councilwoman Schmidt said she believed that the spirit of the motion of February 25, 1980, did not authorize the grading to the extent that it was done. Mr. Laukka recalled that the action was taken because of his primary concern about getting 25,000 yards of peat and muck off the site and that the grading that has taken place is to refill the area from which the peat and muck was removed so as not to leave a big hole which could fill with water. He added that there is still another 7,000 or 8,000 yards of peat to come off the site, and that at this point, he is trying to return the site to the grading -. permit elevations. In response to a question of Councilman Courtney, Mr. Robert . Clark, 7701 Glasgow Drive, said that he would be satisfied with the project if He said that the basic question before the Responding to'Ffr. Kirchbaum's comment, Mr. Erickson said that I; . compliance with the ordinance, compliance with the Plan, diversity of housing Discussion ensued concerning grading which has Mr. Hughes advised that the grading permit was . Mr. Laukka would agree to the. two single family lots at the end of Glasgow Drive. Mr. Richards recalled that four years ago the Council had thought it best to approve even more than what lfr. Laukka is now proposing and that the proposed development is no different than others in the area. He then offered the follow- ing ordinance for First Reading, based upon the Findings and Reasons as supple- mented:. I ORDINANCE EO. 811-A139 . AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO.THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PRD-3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. "The extent of the planned Residential District (Sub-District PRD-3) is Paragraph 4 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is enlarged by adding the following thereto : enlarged by the addition of the following property: Outlot 2, Dewey Hill I1 Addition (which is in Sub-District PRD-3) Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion was seconded by Councilman Bredesen. Bredesen, Richards ,' Van Valkenburg Rollcall : Ayes : Nays: Courtney, Schmidt Motion carried. Councilman Courtney pointed out that he would approve the zoning if the two Glasgow lots were developed as single family lots and hoped that this could be worked out. The Mayor asked that the record show that the Council has listened to neighbors and the developer and that, in considering the soil, the topo- . graphy, the general welfare, density, ahd fairness to the developer, he believed that the ordinance should be granted First Reading. that she had voted "Nay" because the basic problem is that the site is being looked at as a Planned Residential development and that if the procedure had been handled properly in the first place, the present problems would not exist. Mayor explained that the zoning request would now go back to the Planning Commis- sion for consideration of final development plans. LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 1, INTERLACHEN HILLS ADDITION DIVISION APPROVED. We Hughes advised Council of the petition for division of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Interlachen Hills Addition, generally located East of Skyline Drive and South of Interlachen Blvd. Being advised that this lot division is merely to correct a lot division made some years ago and that no new buildable lot is being created, Councilman Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its I Councilwoman Schmidt said.' The ..... adoption : -. . 7/71 30 RES OLTJ'tI ON WHE~EAS , the fol.l.owing described tract of land has been previously divided con- trary to the laws of Minnesota and the ordinances of the then Village of Edina: WHEREAS approval of such subdivision and the ownership of said tract of land .(herein called "Parcel") as separate parcels have now been requested: Parcel 1 - Lot 1 and that part of Lot 3 which lies North of the South 120 feet of Lot 3 and also lies West of the extension in the Southerly direction of the East line of said Lot 1, all in Block 1, Hill's Interlachen Addition; and Parcel 2 - Lot 2 and that part of Lot 3 which lies north of the South 120 feet of Lot 3 and also lies East of the extension in the Southerly direction of the East line of said Lot 1, all in Block 1, Hill's Interlachen Addition; and Parcel 3 - Lot 3 except for that part of said Lot 3 which lies North of the South 120 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Hill's'InterZacl-ien Addition; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of-Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Sub- division and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by th8 City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts om is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney. ' Hill ' s Interlachen Addit ion ; and Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carriedr LOT 42, BLOCK 1, OSCAR ROBERTS 1ST ADDITION DIVISION APPROVED. Nr. Hughes pre- sented the petition for division of a lot: containing a double bungalow located at 7205 Bristol Ci,rcle. No objections being heard, Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoppion: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: WHEREAS, the owners qf the above tract of land desire to subdivide said tract I into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels") described as follows : That part of Lot 42, Block 1, Oscar Roberts First Addition, lying Southerly of a line drawn from a point on the East line of said Lot 42 a distance of 21.53 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof to a point on the South- westerly line of said Lot 42 a distance of 34.52 feet Southeasterly of the most Westerly corner of said Lot 42; and That part of Lot 42, Block 1, Oscar Roberts First Addition, except that part lying Southerly of a line drawn from a point on the East line of said Lot 42 a distance of 21.53 feet South of the Northeast corner thereof to a point on the Southwesterly line of Lot 42 a distance of 34.52 feet Southeasterly of the most Westerly corner of said Lot 42; and Lot 42, Block 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Addition; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance . Nos. 801 and 811; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject; however, to the provision that no further, subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. . hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Rollcall : Ayes : Nays: None Resolution adopted. Bredesen , Courtney , Richards, Schmidt , Van Valkenburg 7/7/80 .- . 102 LOT 7, NIRROR LAI<ES, PEACOW WOOD SECOND ADDITION EDINA HIGHLANDS, APPEAL FROM BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTNENTS HFARING DATE SET. As recommended by Mr. Hughes, Councilman Courtney's niotion was seconded by Councilman Bredesen, setting July 21, 1980, as hearing date for an appeal from a Board of Appeals and Adjustments decision relatiwe to a lot depth variance.and front yard-setback variance for property located at 5908 Vernon Ave. (Lot 7, Mirror Lakes, Neadow Wood Second Addition Edina Highlands) . - . Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Motion carried. Nays: None -. HEARING DATES SET FOR PRELIIIINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR HANSON ESTATES AND WJ.3 FIRST ADDITION. As recommended by Mr. Hughes, Councilman Bredesen's motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney, setting July 21, 1980, as hearing date Frelimin-- ary plat-approval for Hanson Estates and Marten's First Addition. Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. LOT I, BLOCK 1, AND OUTLOT A, LOWE'S FIRST ADDITION EASEMENT VACATION APPROVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr-. Hoffman presented the petition of Binfield for vacation of a utility easement located in Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot A, Lowe 1st Addition, and advised that the petitioner has agreed 'to furnish new easements- 'without cost to Northwestern Bell Telephone Company, Minnesota Gas Company and the City of Edina. No objections being heard, Councilman Richards offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Developments RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES QHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 16th day of June, 1980, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement €or utility purposes; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 7th day of July, 1980, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the publfc that said easenent vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects exist- ing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vaca- tion affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, TKEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the utility easement be-and is vacated effective upon receipt of new utility easements, in recordable form, duly executed and delivered without cost to the City of Edina, Northwest- em Bell Telephone Company or Minnesota Gas Company: . That portion of vacated Valley View Road, formerly Hennepin County Road 39 located in the North 1/2 of Section 7, Township 116, Range 21 and 66 feet in width, lying between the Southerly extension of the East line of Washington Ave. and the West right-of-way line of Hennepin County Roaa No. 18. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Resolution adopted. - ... LOTS 11 AND 12, BLOCK 3, EDINBROOK EASENENT VACATED. Mr. Hoffman advised that at the time the property was replatted, the easement over Lots 11 and 12, Block 3, Edinbrook, was not removed as it should have been. man, Councilman Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 16th day of June, 1980, f-ixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement for utility purposes; and WEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 7th day of July, 1980, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said easement vacation be made; and As recowended by lfr. Hoff- RESOLUTION VACATING UTILITY EASEMENT 7/7/80 WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the utility easement be and is hereby vacated effective as of July 8, 1980: The East 5 feet of Lot. 11, Block 3, "Edinbrook", except as to the North 5 feet thereof, and the West 5 feet of Lot 12, Block 3, "Edinbrook", except The five feet on each side of the lot line dividing Lot 11 and Lot 12, Block 3, "Edinbrook" which lies South of the North five feet of Lots 11 and 12; Said parcel now being located in Tract "A", Registered Land Survey No. 5, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ' as to the North 5 feet thereof; also known as Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Rollcall : Ayes: Nays: None Motion carried. Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt., Van Valkenburg SAND FOR VARIOUS PARKS BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of two bids for sand to be used under playground equipment at Braemar, Pamela, Beard and York Parks. Tabulation showed W. G. Pearson, Inc., at $3,120.00 for 800 tons, with Hedberg & Sons bidding $4,000.00 for 800 tons. for award to recommended low bidder, W. G. Pearson, Inc., at $3,120.00 was seconded by Councilman Richards. Councilwoman Schmidt's motion * Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Kichards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND GUIDELINES REFERRED BACK TO CITY ATTORNEY. referred to a draft of guidelines submitted by the City Attorney for considera- tion of requests for financing projects with industrial development revenue bonds and advised Council that Cherne Industrial, Inc. is not pursuing its application for industrial revenue bonds at this time. Following discussion, it was inform- ally decided that the Council should submit their individual lists of concerns to the City 'Attorney to aid him in revising guidelines for future consideration. WOODDALE SCHOOL STUDY COMMITTEE TO BE APPOINTED. Yr. Rosland recalled that he had met with the Mayor, Mr. George Hite and Dr. Ralph Lieber to discuss a study committee for Wooddale School and presented a resolution for Council's considera- tion which is also being presented to the School District. Councilman Br.edesen then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, with the recommenda- tion that a member of the Edina Historical Society also be appointed to the com- mittee: BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina make its intent known to keep Wooddale School within public domain; and, in.keeping with that objective, establish the Wooddale Use Community Committee to identify implementable and practical uses of the building that are both cost effective and responsive to community con- cerns. Mr. Rosland RESOLUTION' The 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Committee ' s charge : Identify possible public uses of the building and its site. Determine cost implications of operating the building as something other than a school. Revenues, expenditures, and building maintenance should be included in this analysis, Sstablish the responsible party(s) for care and maintenance of the facility, i.e., the City, the School District, other. Work with residents of the Wooddale community to ascertain interest and level of acceptance of the committee's recommendation(s). Present recommendation(s) to the Board of Education and City Council during the month of September, 1980. Committee's membership: Three community members from the Wooddale neighborhood Two community members at large One resource person from the Park and Recreation Department (Rick Jacobson) One resource person from the School District (Donald Pryor) One staff person to the committee supplied by the City administration (Ceil Smith) 7/7/81 Motion for ado tion of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Richards who asked that the conimittee be enlarged to include additional menlbers who would be representative of various areas of the City, inasmuch as it is anticipated'that other scliools will be closed in the future. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Resolution adopted. FOOD PROTECTION ORDINANCE NO. 732 CONTINUED FOR FURTHER STUDY. Mr. Rosland recalled that, as requested by Council, notice of the hearing on the new food protection ordinance No. 732 had been sent to owners of restaurants and vending machines so that they could respond to the proposed ordinance amendments. Rose Boughton, Director of Food Services at Fairview Southdale Hospital, was ad- vised that the proposed ordinance would include private cars which are used for Meals on Wheels, which meals are prepared by the hospital. Administrative Dietician at Fairview Southdale Hospital, concurred with Ms. Bough- ton's concerns and also discussed the fact that fingernail brushes, if required under the ordinance, should also be required to be sanitized. The question was than County regulations. said that he would be able to enforce the ordinance without any additional- s'ta'ff and that he had received no feedback from the large grocery stores. Representa- tives of Northomation, James Kochiras and Jonathan Otis questioned the fact that there machines are checked by the State, the City and by their own employees. They also objected to the fact that the Fire Department has told them that they must have sprinklers in their coolers and freezers. vending machine companies should have advance notice of any increase in the cost of their licenses. Ifr. Velde advised that the proposed ordinance is more encom- : passing than either the State or County requirements in that it contains regula- tions on vending machines, food thawing and equipment and installation procedures and methods. seconded by Councilman Bredesen, that the hearing be continued so that the City Attorney will have &I opportunity to check on the relationship of the County.&a She Department of Agriculture to the City's vending machine licensing system and also to check on the necessity of licensing drivers for Meals on Wheels. I Ms. Ms. Ann Burkhardt, 'raised as to whether the City can adopt an ordinance which is less restrictive In response to questions of the Council, Mr. Velde They also contended that all As recommended by the Mayor, Councilwoman Schmidt's motion was I Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney,.Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. so that he could let them know when the matter will be back before the Council. . Mr. Rosland told Northomation representatives to have their attorney contact him if they had any further questions. Interested parties were asked to give their names to Mr. Velde \ CITY GASOLINE MILEAGE ALLOWANCE INCREASE AUTHORIZED. Mr. Rosland reviewed the amounts of mileage allowances paid by various municipalities and recommended that the City increase its mileage allowance to 23~. Councilman Bredesen pointed out that the General Services Administration guidelines should be used, which guide- lines allow only 22~ per mile and that income taxes must be paid for all amounts in excess of 20~. Following discussion, Councilwoman Schmidt's motion granting 23c mileage was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Ayes : Courtney,. Richards, Schmidt , Van Valkenburg Nays : Bredesen Motion carried. HEMEPIN COUNTY TAX FORFEITED LANDS POLICY DISCUSSED. Council's attention was called to a resolution proposed by Henneph County whereby municipalities would be required to purchase tax forfeited parcels if they desire to om them for pub- lic purposes. It was clarified that the County believes that it is necessary to . respond in this manner to their allegation that many tax forfeited lands are unsold because of disapproval by municipalities, too many conveyances are made to municipalities and too many parcels are acquired by municipalities for resale to private parties. Mr. Erickson said that he would be concerned that the pro- : posed policy of the County would create more problems than it could solve, in addition to being costly for municipalities. Following discussion, Councilman Bredesen's motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney, that the City Attorney and Mr.'Hughes consult with the League of Minnesota Cities and write a letter to Henne- pin strongly opposing the action described in the proposed resolution. Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Notion carried. 49ER'S AGREEMENT REACHED AS TO LOCAL-ISSUES. 'As recommended by Mr. Rosland, Councilman Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: a. 7/7/80 105 I N 0 0 -3 a ,a RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby ratify the following changes in the contract between the City of Edina,and the International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 49: 1. 2. 3. Addition of a working out of classification for five items of heavy equipment; A $100 uniform allowance per person; Establishment of a new rate for qualified water and sewer personnel a rate half way between heavy and light equipment operators. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg' Nays: None Resolution adopted. at ASSESSMENT HEARING DATE SET. As recommended by Mr. Dalen, Councilman Courtney offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. ST.S-162, ST.S-150, ST.S-161 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. SS-352 AND SS-353 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS NOS. TJM-336 AND WIG337 LIFT STATION 'NO. LS-9 AND PARKING LOT NO. P-12 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing forms hereinafter recorded, and the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and parcels of land within the districts affected by said improvements, and said proposed assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are hereby approved and the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open to public inspection, pending hearings thereon as hereh provided. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of Hearing forms hereinafter contained to pass upon said proposed assessments and the Clerk's action in publishing notices of said hearings in the official news- paper in accordance with law is hereby approved; Notices being as follows: (OFF1 CIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA BE~EFIM COUNTY , MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ASSESSMENTS STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. ST.S-150, ST.S-161, ST.S-162 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. SS-352 'AND SS-353 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS NOS. WM-336 AND WM-337 LIFT -STATION NO. LS-9 PARKING LOT NO. P-12 EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at the City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina Minne- sota, on Monday, August 18, 1980, at 7:OO p.m. to hear and pass upon all object- ions, if any, to the following proposed assessments. These assessments are now on file in the office of the Edina City Clerk and open to public inspection. Assessment on the following will be payable in ten equal installments over a period of ten (10) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 7k% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1981. 1. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEkrER NO. 161 District Description: 10, South Harriet Park Addition; thence southeasterly to a point 20 feet south of the north line and 35 feet east of the west line of said Lot 20; thence southerly, parallel with the east line of Wooddale Avenue to the south line of Lot 18, Block 11, South Harriet Park Addition; thence east .to the southeast corner of said Lot 18; thence southerly to the southeast corner of Lot 11, said Blpck 11; thence southerly to the nort.heast corner . of Lot 9, Block 2, Colonial Square; thence southwesterly to a point 30 feet south of the. north line and 50 feet east of the west line of said Lot 9; thence south to a point 60 feet north of the south line and 50 feet east of the west line of Lot 13, Block 2, Colonial Square; thence southeasterly to a point 60 feet south of the north line and 160 feet east.of the west line of Lot 3, Colonial Grove Addition; thence easterly to a point 65 feet east: of the west line and 35 feet south of the north line of Lot 11, Colonial Grove Addition; thence south to a point on the north line of Lot 12, Colonial Grove Addition; which point is 65 feet east of the northwest corner of said Lot 12, thence southeasterly to the southwest corner of said Lot.12; thence easterly to a point. on the south line of Lot 21, Colonial Grove Second Addition; which point is 65 feet east of the southwesx corner of said Lot 21; thence southerly to the northeast corner of Lot 8, Block 1, G.A., Johnson's Southwood, thence Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 20, Block 7/7/80 southwesterly to a point in Lot 7, said Block 1, which point is 50 feet west of the east line and 50 feet north of the south line of said Lot 7; thence southerly to the northeast corner of Lot 6, Block 2, G.A. Johnson's SouChwood; thence Southerly along the enst line of said Lot 6 and its southerly extension to the north line of Lot 1, Block 3, Fairfax; thence westerly to a point on - the north line of Lot 24, said Block 3, which point is 45 feet west of the northeast corner of said Lot 24; thence southwesterly to a point on the south line of said Lot 24, which point is 45 feet east of'the southwest corner of said Lot 24; thence southerly to a point on the south line of Lot 17, Block 3, Fairfax, which point is 45 feet east of the southwest corner of said Lot 17; thence westerly, along the south line of said Lot 17 and its extension, to the center-line of Kellogg Avenue; thence south to the center- line of West 59th Street; thence west to the intersection of the center- lines of West 59th Street and St. Johns Avenue; thence southwesterly to the northeast corner of Block 10, Fairfax; thence west along the north line of said Block 10, to a point 40 feet west of the northeast corner of Lot 24, said Block 10; thence southwesterly to a point on the south line of said Lot 24, which point is 35 feet east of the southwest comer of said Lot 24; thence southerly, parallel with the west line of said Block 10, to a point.25 feet north of the south line of said Block 10; thence southwesterly to the southwest comer of said Block 10; thence west to the southwest corner of Block 9, Fairfax; thence southwesterly to the intersection of the centerlines of Concord Avenue and West 60th Street; thence southerly along the centerline of Concord Avenue to a point 200 feet north of the centerline of Valley View Road; thence north- westerly to a point on Lot 11, Block 2, Virginia Ave. Addition; which point is 50 feet east of the west line 40 feet north of the south line of said Lot 11; thence northerly to a point on the north line of Lot 13, said Block 2, which point is 50 feet east of the northwest corner of said Lot 13, thence south- westerly to the southwest comer of Lot 12, Blockl, Virginia Avenue Addition; thence northwesterly to the southeast comer of Lot 2, Block 1, Code's First Addition; thence northwesterly to the southwest comer of Lot 1, Block 1, Code's First Addition; thence southwesterly to a point 30 feet west of the west line of Lot 6, Block 1, Macliillan's First Addition and 90 feet north of the center- line of Valley View Road as platted; thence northeasterly to point on the west- erly extension of the north line of Lot 8, Block 2, School Manor; which point is 50 feet west of the northwest corner of said Lot 8; thence northeasterly to a point in the west line of Lot 4, Block 2, School Manor, which point is 40 feet south of the northwest corner of said Lot 4; thence east, parallel to the north line of said Lot 4, to a point 10 feet west of the east line of said Lot 4; thence northeasterly to the northeast corner of said Lot 4; thence north- easterly to the northwest of corner of Lot 1, Blk 1, School Manor Addn; thence N on an extension of the east line of-Ruth Drive, a distance of 300 feet; thence northwesterly to a point 700 feet north of the centerline of West 5-9th Street and 235 feet east of the east Right of Way line of State Highway 100; thence west parallel to the center line of West 59th Street to the east Right of Way line'of State Highway 100; thence north along the east Right of Way line of State Highway 100 to a point 115 feet south of the north line of Lot 3, Block 1, Golf Terrace Heights; thence northeasterly to the northeast corner of said Lot 3; thence northwesterly to a point 270 feet north of south line and 170 feet east of the west line of Section 18, Township 28, Range 24; thence east parallel to the south line of Section 18, Township 28, Range 24, a distance of 1340 feet; thence south 270 feet to the northwest comer of ' Lot 7, Block 3, Hansen and Parks First Addition; thence south along the west line of said Lot 7 distance of 85 feet; thence east 85 feet south of and parallel to the north line of Hansen and Park First Addition to the east line of Lot 1, Block 1, Hansen and Parks First Addition; thence northeasterly to point of beginning. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Section 18, Township 28, Range 24, Property Identification Number 18-028-24-31-0006, Section 19, Township 28, Range 24, Property Identification Numbers, 19-028- - -=I - I 24-23-0001, 19-028-24-32-0001, 19-028-24-32-0002~,19-028-24-32-0004, 19-028-24- 32-0005, 19-028-24-32-0006, 19-028-24-32-0008, 19-028-24-32-0009,19-028-24-33- - 0001, 19-028-24-22-0001, 19-028-24-24-0005, 19-028-24-24-000.6, 19-028-24-24- 0007, 19-028-24-24-0008, 19-028-24-24-0004, 19-028-24-24-0003, 19-028-24-24- 0002, 19-028-24-24-0001, Lots 1 thru 10, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 9,'Block 2, Paul Wind Christopher, Lots 1 thru 4, Blk 1, Paul Wind Christopher Second, Lots 1 & 2,'Blk 1, Code's First, Lots 1 thru 6, Lots 11 thru 17 Colonial Grove, Lots 18 & 19. Colonial Grove Second, Lots 9 thru 13, Block 2, Colonial square, Lots 1 thru 15, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 8, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 8, Block 3, Concord Grove, Lots 16 thru 24, Block 3, Lots 1 thru 24, Block 4, Lots 1 thru 24, Block 5, Lots 1 thru 24, Block 6, Lots 1 thru 24, Block 7, Lots 1 thru 24, Block 8, Lots 1 thru 24, Block 9, Lots 13 thru 24, Block 10, Faircax,- . - .. .. 0. CU 0 Pait of Lot-3, Block 4, Lots 4 thru 8, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Lots 1 thru 11, Block 4, Lots 1 thru 6, Block 5, Lots I thru 6, Block 6, Lots 1 thru 5, Block 7, Lots 1 thru 5,, Block 8, Lots 1 thru 13, Block 9, Lots 3 thru 12, Block 10, Golf Terrace Heights, Lots Pt Lot 2 thru 6, ex Hwy; Lots 7 thru 12, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 18, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 16, Block 3, Lots 1 thru 19, Block 4, Golf Terrace Heights First, Lots 1 thru 9, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 7; Block 2, Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Lots 1 thru 7, Block 4, Lots 1 thru 9, Block 5, Golf Terrace Heights Second, Lots 1 thru 6, -Block I, Lots 6, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 7, Block 3, Lots 1 thru 7, Block 4, Hansen and Parks First, Lots.1 thru 5, Block I, Haneyls, Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, Howe's. Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2, G.A. Johnson's Southwood, Lots 2 thru 6, Block 1, MacMillan's First, Lots 1 thru 10, Block 1, Lot 1, Block 2, Marion Gardens, Lots 1 and 2 ex Hwy, Block 1, Replat of Part of Block 1 Golf Terrace Heights, Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 4, Lots 8 thru 11, Block 2, School Manor, Lots 1 thru 9, South Concord, Lots 1 thru 7, Block 1, South Concord Second, Lots 11 thru 20, Block 10, Lots 11 thru 20, Block 11, South Harriet Park, Lots 1 thru 20, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 5 inc Vac Street, Lots 6 thru 20, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 20, Block 3, Lots 1 thru 20, Block 4, Subdivision of Littel Park, Lots 1 thru 21, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2, Stocke and'Hanson's Concord Terrace, Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1, Lot 12, Block 1, Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2, Lots 11 thru 13, Block 2, Virginia Ave, E 80 feet of Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Wind First. Portions of the lots described as Lot 1, Block 3, Lots 4 thru 8, Block 3, Vik- ing Hills Second and Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1, Viking Hills Third. East side of France Avenue from West 76th Street to the South City limits. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: West 4 of southwest k of southwest k, except road., Section 32, Township 28, Range 24. East side of France Avenue from Parklawn Avenue to the South City limits. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Property Identification Numbers, 32-028-24-32-0002, 32-028-24-32-0003, 32-028-24-33-0001, 2. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. 150 3. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN NO. ,336 I ' 4. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER NO. 352. 32-028-24-33-0002, 32-028-24-33-0003, 32-028-24-33-0004. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All or portion of the following described properties;. South half of PID 32-028- 24-23-0001, South half of PID 32-028-24-23-0002, PIDS 32-028-24-32-0002, . ' 32-028-24-33-0004, 32-028-24-33-0003, 32-028-24-34-0006, Section 32, 5. CONSTRUCTION OF LIFT STATION NO. LS-9 32-028-24-32-0003, 32-028-24-33-0001, 32-028-24-32-0006, 32-028-24-33-0002, Township 28, Range 24. .. Assessments on the following will be payable in ten equal installments over a period often (10) years with interest on the entire assessment at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1981: 6. CONSTRUCTION OF PARKING LOT NO. P-12 Colonial Church property on east side of Colonial Way. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 1, Block.2, Colonial Church of Edina First Addition. Assessments on the following will be payable in three equal installments over a period of three (3) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1981: 7. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. 162 * The Habitat Addition in Edina. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1 thru 14, Block 1, Habitat. The Habitat Addition in Edina. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1 thru 14, Block 1, Habitat. The Habitat Addition in Edina. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lots 1 thru 14, Block 1, Habitat. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN NO. 337 9- CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER NO. 353 , First payment of this assessment will be payable with the taxes for the year 1980, collectible in 1951. To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the same rate for one year on all unpaid installments. assessed for the above improvements may pay the whole of the assessment without interest to the City Treasurer on or before November 15, 1980, or make payment with accrued interest to the County Treasurer. Any owner may appeal the assessment The owner of the property 7/ 7/ 80 .- -* 108 to the District Cour pursuant to lUnnesota Statute , Section 429.081, by serv- .ing notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the lfayor or Clerk. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and guide- lines for deferring special assesgments against homestead property owned by persons 65 years of age or older for whom payments would be a hardship. To obtain deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in the first paragraph of this notice. application forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL. For further information and Florence B. Hallberg City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Richards.. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Motion carried. HUMAN SERVICES INVENTORY DISCUSSED. Councilwoman Schmidt recalled that at the meeting of June 16, 1980, the Council had informally agreed not to participate in filling out a "needs assessment" for the South Hennepin Human Services Council. She referred to a new questionnaire received by Council and recommended that this be filled out by individual members inasmuch as the Federal Government has now put all of the catagorical grants into one block grant as far as human services 2 are concerned. She clarified that the County will be working through the various Human Services Councils distributing funds for such needs as mental health, mental retardation and the many programs that impact on human services. Council- woman Schmidt recalled that Councilman Bredesen was concerned that this survey would go into a needs assessment, rather than inventory, but explained that the County would be working thru the Human Services Councils, distributing funds for the programs and all.things that will impact on Human Services. sen expressed his concern that the County will use the results of the question- naire more and more as justification for doing more and more even though nobody wants to pay for it, and suggested that this is a "no-win" deal. Schmidt said that she thinks the City is ahead of the game because she believes that the County will require each municipality to do this very thing. action was taken. FALSE ALARM C'IRGE DISCUSSED. "he Mayor referred to complaints of residents be- cause the City is now charging for false alarms and advised that Minneapolis now has a similar ordinance. N$I Eamal action was taken. Councilman Brede- Councilwoman No formal - NEW MUCE BIDS TO BE TAKEX. As recommended by Mr. Rosland, Councilwoman Schmidt's motion authorizing the staff to take bids for a new ambulance, was seconded by Councilman Richards. Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None . Motion carried, LEVY LIMIT MEETING NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised Council that the A.M.M. is conduct- ing a meeting regarding levy limits at 7:30 p.m. on Thursday, July 31, 1980. NO: action was taken. HOPKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT MEETING NOTED. a meeting which is being conducted by the Hopkins School District to furthec cooperation between neighborhg municipalities and school districts. MANAGER'S ABSENCE FROM CITY NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised Council that he will be out of town between July 11 and July 15 and 1980. No action was taken. WORKING DRAWINGS AUTHORIZED FOR VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO CITY PROPERTIES. Mr. Ros- land referred to the presentations made at the special informational Council Meet- ing held at 4:30 this afternoon for remodeling the City Hall, the Public Works Garage, the Grandview Liquor Store and for acquisition of a new telephone system. He recalled that funds had been set aside in the City Budgets for the past five years for these improvements and that the staff believes that this is the right time to proceed inasmuch as many bids have been coming in lower than estimated. . He then presented the following proposals for Council's action: The Mayor called Council's attentior, to, I again between July 23 and August 1, 7/7/80 109 cu 0 m -3 5 Q: City Hall Remodeling - Nr. Rosland presented plans €or remodeling City Hall, which project is being proposed at this time because of the State law requiring handi- capped access for all public buildings. Changes, which would include the ent- . rance for the handicapped and which would provide additional needed space for the Police Department, are estimated to cost $197,000, $50,000 of which is in the 1980 Budget, with the balance of $143,OUO to be paid from Community Development Funds. Councilman Richards said that he does,not believe that this is the time to spend money in this manner. Councilman Bredesen said that he does not believe that the handicapped access should be built when it would very rarely, if ever, . be required for use by theshandicapped. Members Schmidt and Courtney concurred that the City is apt to be getting lower bids at this time and recalled that. the State is mandating construction of the handicapped entrance. Schmidt then moved approval of obtaining working drawings for the remodeling for City Hall. Councilwoman Motion was seconded by Councilman Courtney. Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: Bredesen, Richards Motion carried, Public Works Garage Remodeling - Mr. Rosland explained that it is proposed to add a mezzanine, new roofing and a sprinkling system to the Public Works Building at a cost of approximately $168,000. Addition.of the mezzanine would provide additional storage space. Mr. Rosland said that the present roof is leaking and that'City codes require all public buildings to have a sprinkling system for fire prevention. Councilman Richards objected to the proposal, saying that plans should first be made for the entire Public Works area so that all options could be studied at the same time. by Councilwoman Schmidt, authorizing working drawings adding the mezzanine to the Public Works garage. Ayes : Bredesen , Courtney, Schmidt , Van Valkenburg Nays : Richards Motion carried. Councilman Courtney's motion was then seconded Telephone System - Mr. Rosland explained that the present telephone system is not capable of adequately handling the number of calls that go thru the present switchboard. He said that both Northwestern Bell and G.T.E. have advised that a new telephone system will be less expensive on a monthly basis than present costs and that it will become increasingly expensive to maintain the present system. Mr. Rosland recommended that bids be tzken with alternatives to buy or lease the equipment. Councilman Bredesen suggested that it might be better not to buy a new technology since he believed that prices will drop and the techno- logy might not prove itself. been substan'tial in the past few years. Councilwoman Schmidt's motion that bids be taken for buying or leasing a new telephone system was seconded by Councilman Courtney. He said that changes in telephone systems have . Ayes: Courtney, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays : Bredesen, Richards Motion carried. Grandview Liquor Store - Mr. Rosland explained that the foundation of the Grand- view Liquor Store is sagging and needs shoring up. space be added for needed storage and retail space and that a new front entry be constructed to eliminate the loss of heat when the doors are opened. Councilman Bredesen's motion was then seconded by Councilmar, Courtney, authorizing hiring an architect to prepare plans for the remodelingi He recommended that additional Ayes : Bredesen, Courtngy , Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None lbtion carried. ALLEY SURFACING PETITION RECEIVED. Mr. Rosland presented a petition for surfac- ing the alley in the S80U block between Abbott and Beard Avenues, which petition was referred to che Engineering Department for processing by motion of Councilman Richards, seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt. Ayes: Nays: None Motion carried. Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg ORDINANCE NO. llll-~7 ADOPTED. nance fctr Second Reading and moved its adoption: Councilwoman Schmidt offered the following ordi- ORDINANCE NO. 1111-A7 TO CHANGE THE WATER RATES AND CHARGES FOR THE AN ORDINANCE &ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1111: MORNINGSIDE AREA AND THE BEARD AVENUE/ABBOTT PLACE AREAS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: to read as follows: Section 1. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 3 of Ordinance No. 1111 is hereby amended "(a) Water consumed will be charged on the basis of meter readings at the following rates: "(1) . For all consumers within the City of Edina, except the areas described at (2) and (3) below, the rate for 100 cubic feet shall be: GROSS 33c - NET 30C - "(2) For all consumers within the area formerly known as the Village of Morningside will be charged at the rate of 85C 77C per 100 cubic feet if paid within the discount period. For all consumers in the area described as the East side of Beard Ave. from W. 54th Street to Fuller Street and both sides of Abbott Place from W. 54th Street to Beard Avenue will be charged at the rate of 85C per 100 cubic feet gross, or 77c per 100 cubic teet if paid within the discount period." Sec. 2. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec. 3 of Ordinance No. 1111 are hereby amended to read as follows: "(b) A minimum charge of $2 per month will be made where water con- sumption amounts to less. (c) per.lOO cubic feet gross or I "(3) The following flat annual charges shall be made by the water system, 'and will be subject to increase when necessary: ' (1) Sewer Department for water used in flushing $1,000.00 and skating rinks 1,000.00 streets 1,000.00 (2) (3) Park Department for water used for sprinkling Street uepartment for water used in flushing Sec, 3. Paragraph (c) of Sec. 4 of Ordinance No, 1111 is hereby amended to Delinquent notices will be mailed 30 days after original bills, read as follows: and water service will be discontinued to any accounts delinquent 45 days. charge of $5 will be made and shall be payable before service is restored." its entirety. read as follows: or re-establishing service at the customer's request, or if service is discon- tinued for non-payment of bills." Sec. 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Courtney. "(c) A Sec. 4. Paragraph (d) of Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 1111 is hereby deleted in Sec. 5. Paragraph (f) of Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 1111 is hereby amended to . "(f) A service charge of $20 will be made for shutting off curb stops Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Val Nays: None Ordinance adopted... \ ATTEST: ' CityClerk 4 ORDINANCE NO. 1101LA8 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Councilwoman Schmidt offered the following ordinanae for Second Reading and moved its adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 1101-A8 * AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO, 11O1-Al TO CHANGE THE SEWER PZNTAL CHARGES FOR THE USE OF THE MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM THE CITy COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: amended to read as follows: the fees for each classification are hereby established as follows: are defined in Ordinance No. 811) MONTHLY FEES ' Section 1. "(a) Classification and Fees. Classification of sewer rental accounts and CLASSIFICATION (below classifications . GROSS Bas&f upon water usage during winter between November 1 and March 1) Paragraph (a) of Section 1 of Ordinance No. 1101-A1 is hereby I- NET - . Single family dwellings, toknhouses, two family dwellings, apartment quarter. (Three month period falling building conraining four or less dwelling units : To and including 2000 units of * 9. 100 cubic feet $4.95 per month $4.50 per month 7/7/80 I cu 0 a, -3 .a I From 2001 to and including 4000 units of 100 cubic feet From 4001 to and including 7000 units of 100 cubic feet From 7001 and over units of 100 cubic feet Apartment buildings with more than four dwelling units Commercial and industrial buildings, including schools and churches . GROSS 7.70 per month NET - 7.00 per month . 13.20 per month 12.00 ,per month 0.77 per 100 cubic feet $59.40 plus 11.00 for each unit over four, or 77 cents per hundred cu.ft. of water used dur- ing the quarter, whichever is greater $14.85 per water meter or approved sewage metering device on the premises, .or 77 cents per hundred cu. ft. of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater. *. 0.70 per 100 cubic feet $54.00 plus 10.00 . for each unit .. : over four, or 70 cents per hundred cu. ft. of water used during the quarter, which- . ever is greater. $13.50 per water meter or . approved sewage metering device on the premises, or 70 cents per hundred CU. ft. of water used during the quarter, which- ever is greater. Sec. 2. and publicat ion. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Councilman Bredesen. Rollcall : - Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, V2n Valkenburg Nays: None Ordinance adopted. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage ATTEST: $L 83. City Cle MIXEID USE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED FOR AREA WEST OF YOFX AVE. , SOUTH OF W. 76TH STREET. Mr. Peter Jarvis of Bather, Ringrose and Wolsfeld, representing his client,. to the possibility of developing the area West of York Ave. and South of IJ. 76th Street with modest cost housing and an office building. 25 acre parcel, which was formerly owned by ETOC, is presently planned for a high quality office building and warehouse. field Development to eliminating the warehouse plan and constructing moderate cost ' condominiums and rental apartments. Council was advised that this development would aim toward providing housing for younger people working in Edina who are in the $16,000 to $35,000 annual income range and who would be potential home buyers who would hopefully remain in Edina and enroll their children in the Edina school system. Mr. Jarvis emphasized that his client is proposing high density housing. Mr. Erickson said that it might be necessary to amend the Zoning Ordinance to include a Planned Unit Development District. Councilmen Bredesen, Courtney and Richards expressed interest in the proposal, saying that they did not have a negative reaction, but could not at this time commit themselves definitely. Councilwoman Schmidt was reluctant to express any opinion at this time. Mr. Jar- vis said that he did not want,Winfield Development to run up high architectural fees to develop a very complicated and unique mixed use residential and office use development only to have it fall flat because the concept was not acceptable to the Council. Mrs. McClelland concurred with Mr. Jarvis that, in his informal pre- sentation to the Planning Commission, she had thought the proposal was too dense, four or five members thought that it would be acceptable and one member was "some- where in the middle". i * Winfield Development Company , approached the Council to learn its 'general reaction He explained that this Consideration is now being given by Win- She added that she thought that the proposal had creative 7/7/80 possibilities and could well support what the Metropolitan Council is asking of the City. vacant and could serve as a buffer between the proposed development and the adjacent commercial area. Mr. Dalen suggested that, in addition to the proposed project, the City should consider building apartments which would be between 600 and 650 square feet in size for housing for Edina's elderly who have reached a stage where they must give up their homes. also be in a Tax Increment District. No formal action was taken. H.R.A. REPORT FILED. December 31, 1979, was presen.ted by Mr. Dalen and ordered placed on file by motion of Councilwoman Schmidt, seconded by Councilman Richards. Mrs. McClelland also pointed out that the Hedberg property is still He said that such a project would The Housing and Redevelopment Authority Balance Sheef as of . Ayes: Nays : -None 30 tion carried. Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van ._ Valkenburg HEARING DATE SET FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC INPROVEMENTS. As recommended by Mr. Hughes, Councilman Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON GRADING, GRAVELING, DRAINAGE IMPROVEEENT NO. P-C-132 WATEREIA'IN IMI?ROVENENT NO.. P-WM-340 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P-SS-356 . PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB AND GUTTER NO. P-BA-245 1. the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of- the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Nonday, July 21, 1980, at 7:OO p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in subs tantially the following form: The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 14. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING GRADING, GRAVELING, DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT NO. P-C-132 . WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P-WM-340 SANITARY SETJER IMPROVENENT NO. P-SS-356 PE"ENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB AND GUTTER NO. P-BA-245 EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, July 21, 1920, at 7 :00 p .m. to consider the following proposed improvements to- be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: The approx5mate cost -. GRADING; GRAVELING, DRAINAGE (Includes R-0-W Acquisition) ESTIMATED COST IMPROVEMENT NO. P-C-132 $102,988.84 WATERMAIN . IMPROVDENT NO. P-184-340 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P-SS-356 * $43,281.02 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB AND GUTTER .IMPROVEMENT NO. P-BA-245 . .. . .. .* . The areas proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of proposed improvements includes: running North from a point in the South line of Lot 23 Dist. #676, 3/10' East from 9.W. corner thereof and parcel with W. line thereof & lying N. of highway; That part of Lot 23 lying W. of a line running N. from a point in S. line of Lot 23 Dist. 8676, 3/10' E. from S.W. corner thereof and parcel with W. line thereof; E. 16 5 x 10' of Lot 4 and that part of N. 16 5 & 1O'of said lot lying W. of E. 16 5 & 10' thereof ex. hwy.; that part of Lot 4 lying W. of the E. 16 1 and 2 ft. and S. of the N. 16 1 & 2' thereof and East of Naas Lake Side Addition except hwy.; Lot 3, Block 1, Crosstown Hills Addition. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney. W. 150' of that part of Lot 23 lying East of a line Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Van Valkenburg Nays: None Resolution adopted. .. $40,945.19 - - .. $51,481.14 7/7/83 CLAIMS PAID. for payment oE the Eollowing claims as per Pre-List: Park Fund, $8,104.22; Art Fund, $2,271.15; Park Construction, $11,769.49; Swimming Pool, $3,264.91; Golf Course, $12,467.72; Recreation Center, $3,570.20; Gun Range, $12.50; Water Fund, $1,520.44; Sewer Fund, $481.95; Liquor Fund, $61,406.60; Construction, $20,122.58; Total, $177,804.67; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims: General Fund, $23,406.98; Park Fund, $427.41; Art Center, $37.62; Swimming Pool, $260.06; Golf Course, $3,355.00; Recreation, $13C; Gun Range, $16.65; Water Fund, $1,390.60; Liquor Fund, $264,052.88; Total, $292,947.33. ' Nays: None Motion of Councilman Bredesen was seconded by Councilman Courtney General Fund, $52,812.91; Ayes : Bredesen, Courtney, ,Richards , Schmidt , Van Valkenburg Motion carried. Council's agenda having been covered, Councilman Courtney's motion for adjourn- ment was seconded by Councilman Bredesen, Adjournment at 10:25 p.m. 4k 8- %.L/ City Clerk a I