Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19820104_regularMINUTES OF THE RGGULllR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 4, 1982 I Answering rollcall were members Bredesen, Rj-chadds,"Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSED. Mr . Dirk DeVries and Ms. Earbara Senness werepresent from the Metropolitan Council to react informally to the City's Comprehensive Plan implementation as requested by Council at its meeting of December.21, 1981. something which might impact the metropolitan system, the matter should be refer- red to the Metropolitan Council. He said that the Xetropolitan CounCil has..ten dags in which to review the matter to see if any impact exists and to respond to the City. Mr. DeVries explained further that there is an additional 60 days iE the Metropolitan Council believes that the matter under consideration might have an environmental impact which would concern a neighboring municipality, and the: time period could extend up to ninety days if the proposal should, in reality, have an impact on other metropolitan areas. should come from the City and that the Plan should be a "living document", and that the Metropolitan Council will not try to police any changes and would not try to dictate to any municipality, In response to Member Richards' statement that the City Council believes that implementation should be accomplished locally, Mr. DeVries agreed, but emphasized that regional concerns such as sewer systems, the airport and freeways will be considered from time to time and will be aired at public hearings. said that the City could put more into its plan than the Land Planning Act calls for. Ms. Senness added that the Land PI-anning Act calls for 1) describing regu- latory controls which influence the Plan; 2) a capital improvements program; and 3) Council implementation. She assured Council Yhat they would be involved in any decision on any matter of significance to the City and that the City could instigate its own changes. No .formaL action was taken. Mr. DeVries explained if the City thinks it is doing He clarified that the initiative In response to a question of Member Turner, Mr. DeVries ORDINANCE NO. 81.1-A157 ADOPTED ON SECOND READIHG. Member Turner offered Ordin- ance No. 8114157 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows: -. ORDINANCE NO. 811-A157 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING A PUNNED OFFICE DISTRICT AND BY PROHIBITING ADDITIONAL SUBDISTRICTS 0-1 AYD 0-2 TiiE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDIHA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS : amended to read as follows: trict is hereby established and shall further be divided into sub-districts designated as Districts 0-1, 0-2 and POD-1 and POD-2, as shown on the official zoning map of the City and by the amendments hereafter made to this paragraph." hereby amended by adding a new Paragraph 4 as follows: Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section 8 (Office Building District) is hereby "Sec..l. Bouadaries of Office Building District. The Office Building Dis- Sec. 2. Section 8 (Office Euilding District) of Ordinance No. 811 is "4. Planned Office District (POD) I' (a) Purpose of Planned Offze District. The purpose of this section is to provide a procedure that insures the orderly development of buildings and uses permitted in the Office Building District which will be complementary to and compatible with existing high quality office buildings; to enhance the compatibility of uses permitted in the Office Building District with the pre- dominantly residential character of the City of Edina; to insure to the owners and occupants of uses permitted in the Office Building District the benefit of an exemplary planned development; and to enable the Planned Office District to make its fair contribution to the general health, safety and welfare of the City of Edina. into sub-districts designated as POD-1 and POD-2. approximate the requiremenrs of the 0-1 and 0-2 sub-districts respectively. shall be the same as those allowed in the Offlce Suilding Eistricts as provided for by this Section. TIie following mininum restrictions shall apply to all buildings that may be erected, converted, or structurally altered in the POD: (b) Sub-districts. The Planned Office District shall 3e divided The sub-districts will (c) Uses. Principal and accessory uses allowed within the POD (d) Restrictions on Uses Permitted within the Planned Office District. (I) Restrictions relating to off-street parking, storage, off- .- street loading, and trash and garbage inrinerators shall be Lhe same as tile restrictions imposed up.on the Office Building Dis- trict by this Sect.ion. .. .. .' . .. . ~ :. . . . I.___ _f . .. - . ...._. _. _- .. . 2. 1/4/82 (4) (5) (e) Development. Floor Area Ratio. tract zoned POD shall not exceed .5 times the lot area. Lot Coverage. be occupied by buildings. Building Height. shall be limited to four stories. sub-district shall be governed by the setback requirements contained in the POD. Building Setbacks. In the POD-1 and POD-2 sub-districts, the minimum building setback from the right of way of any public road or street shall be 35 feet or the building height, which- ever is greater. boundary (which does not abut a public road or street) shall be 20 feet or the building height, whichever is greater. In the POD-2 subdistrict, any structure 5 or 6 stories in height shall be no closer to any R-1 District boundary, except those R-1 Districts which are utilized (as of the date of construc- tion of the POD building) for non-residential purposes, than two times the building height. For a structure 7 or 8 stories in height, the setback shall be no less than three times the building height. For a structure of 9 or more stories in height, the setback shall be no less than four times the build- ing height from any. R-1 District' boundary, except those R-1 Districts which are utilized (as of the date of construction of the POD building) for non-residential purposes. When an R-1 Residential District is across a street from a POD, the setback from the street right of way shall be not less than 50 feet. then the Planned Office District is an integral part of either a Planned Commercial District or a Planned Industrial District, setbacks from the right of way of public streets and roads shall not be less than that prescribed for the major planned district. Procedure for Planned Office District Zoning and Subsaquent The Gross Floor Area of all buildings on the Not more than 30% of the tract zoned POD shall Building height in the POD-1 sub-district Building height in the POD-2 The minimum building setback from the POD I (1) Application. A petition or application for rezoning f.rom any dis- trict to POD shall be filed with the Planning Department as provided for in Paragraph 6 of Section 13 of this ordinance, by the owner or owners of the entire land area to be so zoned. be accompanied by a Preliminary Development Plan drawn to a scale of not more than 50 feet to the inch upon which are shown the following data and information : (5) The entire outline, dimensions, and area of the tract described in the application. (b) The existing topography, tree cover, waterbodies, and other natural amenities 1oc.ated on the tract described in the application. (c) All existing structures, rights of way widths and travelled widths of all public roadways located within 100 feet of the perimter of the tract. The location, general exterior dimensions, approximate gross floor area, and height of all proposed structures. The location arrangement, and number of automobile parking stalls and truck loading facilities. (2) Preliminary Development Plan. Every petition or application shall (d) (e) . --(-3) Commynity Development and Planning Commission Review. Within 45 days after receipt of all information required by (2) above in form and substance acceptable to the Planning Department, the Planning Depart- . ment will review the application and Preliminary Development Plan and forward said application and Plan with a report of the Planning Depart- ment, to the Community Development and Planning Commission. The Commission shall thereupon review the application, the Preliminary Development Plan and the report of the Planning Department and forward same to the City Council with its recommendation. Council Action. shall review the application, the Preliminary Development Plan, the report of the Planning Department, and the recommendation of the Community Development and Planning Comniission. An affirmative vote of 4/5ths of the Council shall be required to grant preliminary approval. If preliminary approval of the rezoning is granted, the applicant or petitioner may prepare a Final Development Plan-for final approval by the Community Development and Planning Commission and the City Council. The Final Development Plan shall be submitted to the Community Development and Plaming Commission and shall include I (4) The City Council shall conduct a public hearing and ~ (5) Final Development Plan. '1f 4/82 3 the information and data delineated on the Preliminary Development Plan and, in addition, the following data and information : (a) Elevation drawings of all proposed structures which include a description of the proposed exterior building materials (b) The locations , dfmensions , and designs of all driveways , vehicular entrances and.exits, driveway intersections with streets, parking areas, loading areas, maneuvering areas and sidewalks. A landscape plan and landscape schedule showing the size, species, and location of existing plant materials to be retained and also all new proposed plant. materials. A general overall grading plan indicating final grades and the direction and destination of surface drainage. A preliminary layout and design of all proposed watermains, sanitary sewers, drainage facilities and storm sewers , together with existing and proposed easements therefor. Any other information required, in the opinion of the Planning Director, to insure compliance with the requirements contained herein or other applicable City ordinances. (c) (d) (e) (f) (6) Final Approval, The Community Development and Planning Commission shall report favorably upon the Final Development Plan upon finding that : (a) The proposed development is consistent with the City's Compre- hensive Plan. (b) The proposed development will not be detrimental to properties sur- rounding the tract of land proposed for rezoning. (c) The proposed development.wil1 not result in an overintensive land use. (d) The proposed development will not result in undue traffic con- (e) The proposed development conforms to the provisions of this Sec- tion, and other applicable City ordinances. The City Council may accept or deny the findings of the Community Develop- ment and Planning Commission and thereby approve or disapprove the Final Development Plan. stitute final rezoning and the publication ofthe ordinance amendment affect- ing the zoning change shall be authorized. (7) Filing. ning Department. (8) Subdivision of Land. Any land transferred from any zoning district . to the Planned Office District which is not platted into lots and blocks at that time of the transfer shall be platted pursuant to and in accordance with Edina Ordinance No. 801. (a) gestion or traffic hazards. -. Approval of the Final Development Plan shall also con- The approved Final Development Plan shall be filed in the Plan- (9) Development. The Development of the Planned Office District shall be done and accomplished in full compliance with the approved Final Develop- ment .Plans and other applicable City ordinances. Applications for building permits shall be reviewed by the Planning Director to determine if they conform to the provisions of this ordinance and the approved Final Development Plans. Upon approval by the Planning Director, the building permit application shall be submitted to the City Building Official for processing. Revisions or changes. Minor changes in the location and place- ment of buildings as shown on approved Final Development Plans may be authorized by the Planning Director where unforeseen circumstances dictate such a change. Other changes which affect the overall design of the development shall be referred to the Community Development and Planning Commission for review and recommendation of the Council, after which the City Council shall hold a public hearing, shall review the changes and recom- mendations, and such other information as it deems necessary or desirable, and shall decide to either approve or deny the changes to the Final Development Plans. to the Final Development Plans shall require an affirmative vote by a majority of the City Council. Sec. 3. Section 8 (Office Building District) of Ordinance No. 811 is "5. (b) The approval of such changes hereby amended by adding a new Paragraph 5 as follows: be transferred to sub-districts 0-1 and 0-2 from and after January 1, 1982. However , those properties presently within sub-districts 0-1 and 0-2 shall remain subject to the provisions applicable to the 0-1 or 0-2 sub-district in which they are located. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Richards, Prohibition of Additional Sub-districts 0-1 and 0-2. No property shall " .. . . ,. 1/4/82 Rollcall : 'Ayes : Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None 3 Ordinance adopted. ATTEST : .. ., 75, l&/*c;! City Clerk LOTS 3 AND 4, BLOCK 5, GLENVIEIJ ADDITION DIVISION APPROVED. BIr. Hughes prert- sented a proposed division of Lots 3 and 4, Block 5, Glenview Addition,'which will convey a small triangular parcel*from the rear yard of Lot 3 to the rear of Lot 4 in order to allow construction of an accessory building in the rear yard of Lot 4. No objections being heard, Member Schmidt offered the following reso- lution and moved its adoption: . RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels : Lots 4 and 5, Block 5, Glenview Addition; and WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels").: Lot 4, Block 5, and that part of Lot 3, Block 5, Glenview Addition, ly- lying Westerly of a line drawn parallel with and 32.0 feet Easterly of the Westerly line of said Lot 4; and Lot 3, Block 5, Glenview Addition, except that part lying Pesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 32.0 feet Easterly of the Westerly lhe .of said Lot 4; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as.separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Sub- division and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City'Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and.ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811 are . hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of landbut are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or.with the prior approvai of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmid,t, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. LOT 4, BLOCK 7, BRAEMAR HILLS 9TH ADDITION DIVISION APPROVED. Mr. Hughes pre- sented the petition to divide Lot 4, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition along the party wall. resolution*and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, the followZng described property is +at present a single tract of land: Lot 4, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addit ion; and LTHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels") described as follows : That part of Lot 4, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition, lying TJesterly of a line run from a point on the South line of Lot 4, a distance of ' 63.63 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 4, to a point on ._ North line of Lot 4, a distance of 32.23 feet East of the Northwest comer of said Lot 4; and That part of Lot 4, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition, except that part lying Westerly of a line run from a point on the South line of Lot 4, a distance of 63.63 feet East of the Southwest comer of said Lot 4, to a point on the North line of Lot 4, a distance of 32.23 feet East of the Northwest comer of said Lot 4; and WHEl?EAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Ordinance No. :801.and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unneccssary.hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811; No objection being heard, liember Schmidt offered the following RESOLUTION 1/4/82 NOW, THERJFORE, BE IT IESOLLTD by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownersh:ip of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is liereby appr'oved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance-Nos. 801 and 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and convey- ance thereof as separate tractx of land, but only to the extent permitted under Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance KO. 81'1 and subject to the limitations set out in Ordinance No. 8lfl and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further, subject however, to the provisions that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the pr5or approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Piember Bredesen. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. LOT 5, BLOCK 7, BRAEMAR HILLS 9TH ADDITION LOT DIVISION APPROVED. Mr. Hughes Dresented the petition to division Lot 5, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition along the party wall. following resolution and moved is adoption: WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of 'land: IMEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels") described as follows : The West 52.80 feet of Lot 5, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition; and That part of Lot 5, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition, except the West 52.80 feet; and WHEREAS , the requested subdivision is authorized under Ordinance No. 801 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regula- tions of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as-separate tracts of land do not intezfere with the purpose of the Subdivi- sion'and zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811; NOW, THEREFORF, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as sep- arate tracts of land is hereby approvsd and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811 are hereby waived to allow scid division and convey- ance.thereeof as separate tracts of land, but-only to the extznt permitted mder Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 and subject to the limitations set out in Ordinance No. 811 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provisions that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the. pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. No objections being heard, Eember Schmidt offered the RESOLUTION Lot 5, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition; and ' Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. . LOT 5, BLOCK 1, IJYDLANHEAD CREST AND LOT 19, BLOCK 5, IRDIAN HILLS DIVISION ' APPROVED. Mr. Hughes presented the petition for a lot division which would enlarge Lot 19, Block 5 , Indian Hills, to provide a more logical front yard. No objections being heard, Member Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, the following described trxcts of land constitute various separate parcels : WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels") : RESOLUTION Lot 19, Block 5, Indian Hills, and Lot 5, Block 1, Indianhead Crest; and Lot 19, Block 5, Indian Hills, and that part of Lot 5, Block 1, Indianhead Crest, lying Northeasterly of a line described as fol.lows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Lot 5, a distance of 168.6 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Lot 5; thence Southeasterly to E point on the East line of said Lot 5 a distance of 68.0 feet Southwesterly of the Northeasterly corner of said Lot 5 and there terminating; and Lot 5, Block 1, Indianhead Crest, except that part lying Northeasterly of a line described as follows: said Lot 5, a distance of 168.6 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Lot 5, thence Southeasterly to a point on the East line of said Lot 5, a distance of 68.0 feet Southwesterly of the Northeasterly corner of said Beginning at a point on the North line of 1/4/82 .-. . .. -. . ... ' L0.t 5 and there terminating; and VHEREAS, it has been dcterniined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Sub- division and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate L . tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other pro- vision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivi-. sion be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordi- nances of the City of'Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. ' 801 and 811; Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. Richards'.motion was seconded by Ifember Turner, setting January 18, 1982, for. hearing date Tor the following Planning matters : I) As recommended by Mr. Eughes, Member Community Development Corporation - Amendment to overall development plan for SR-5 Senior Citizen Residence (Generally located North of Parklawn Ave. and West of York Ave.) Marthe Woods Hill Addition - Preliminary plat approval (Generally located North of W. 78th Street and East of Gleason Road.) Bredesen , Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney 2) Ayes : Nays: None Motion carried. - POLICE CARS BID AI?ARDED. ice cars as follows: No. l: Suburban Chevrolet, $9,531.00, Malkerson Motors, $8,914.50 and Nelson-Linzen at $8,360.00; and No. 2: Nelson-Linze, $7,740.20, .Malkerson Notors, $8,619.20; and Shburban Chevrolet at $8,716.00. ber Schmidt was seconded by Member Richards for award to Nelson-Linze, recommended low bidder in each case. Mr, Rosland presented tabulation of quotes for kwo pol- Motion of Mem- Ayes: Eredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Xotion carried. 7500 YORK AVENUE FIRE DISCUSSED. from Chief Buresh and Chief Swanson discussing the control of the fire at 7500 York Ave. No action was taken. GLEASON ROAD CURVE DISCUSSED. on cume on:GleasonC Road South of the Cras'stown Highway ;there was discussion of the possibility of straightening the curve. New Jersey Sarriers along with the City and County to cooperate in funding the project. curve is hazardous even at a "low speed". Council's attention was called to memorandums Three accidents having occurbed in one night a-ilythe A suggestion was made to install In response to a question of the Mayor, Mr. Rosland said that the-: No action was taken. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING DATE SET. motion setting January 21, 1982, at 5:OO P.M. as Meeting Date for a special ses- sion of the Council, As recommended by Mr. Rosland, Member Schmidt's was sec.onded-by.Xember Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Mays: None Motion carried. COUNTY ROAD 18/VALLEY VIEFJ ROAD INTERCIMGE DISCUSSED. Mr. Hoffman advised Council that Eden Prairie has requested the City of Edina to participate in improvement of the intersection of Valley View Road and County Road 18 by real- igning the road and installing a stop signal, with Edina's share being estimated at $31,750.00 of which $26,000 was signal cost. Council had not wanted to do anything to the intersection which would facilitate use of Valley View Road as a route to Southdale Center. decided that Eden Prairie be advised that Edina would not participate in any costs for something for which the City would receive no benefit. ORDINANCE NO. 66 1 GRANTED SECOND READING. 661 for Second Reading and moved its adoption: Ifember Richards re-called that It was informally Member Bredesen offered Ordinance No 11 41 82 ORDINANCE .NO. 66 1 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR CERTAIN FALSE ALARM RESPONSES WE BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, PIINNESOTA, ORDAINS: emergency response and each subsequent emergency response by the Fire Department within one (1) calendar year to a false fire alarm or signal. A false 'fire alarm or signal means an audio or visual signal from an automatic fire alarm system triggered other than by reason of the occurrence of a fire. Sec. 3. means necessary, including the institution of civil action against the owner, occupant or agent of the bu'ilding or system, or his or its agent. its passage and publication. Motion for adoption cf the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Secticrn 1. A fee of $150.00 shall be payable to the City for the third Sec. 2. The City shall have the power to collect such fee by whatever Sec. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect iminediately upon Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST : . w'* 1 1 -t- 4.J-UL4L4 .Y - I City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 171-A4 GRANTED SECOND READING. Member Bredesen offered Ordinance No. 171-A4 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows: .. ORDINANCE NO. 171-A4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SCHEDULE A TO ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO ADD THERETO THE FEE FOR A FALSE FIRE ALARM RESPONSE PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 661 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: between Fee'No. 22 and Fee No. 23 the following: ORDINANCE SECTION, PITRPOSE OF .FEE FEE KO. 66 1 1 False fire alarm $150.00 for the third and each 22a Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance NO. 171 is hereby amended by inserting NO. NO. OR CHARGE AMOUNT - response fee subsequent response wfthLn one calendar year Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST : 25. LiL, / &&.&o,- , City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 171-AG ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Nember Bredeser,,offered Ordi- nance No. 171-A6 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 17i-A6 TO CHANGE WATER aTES AND CHARGES FOR THE P.(IP3lIhTGSIDE AREA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 AND THE BEARD AVEAWE/ABBOTT PLACE AREAS .. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTLI, ORDAINS: Section 1. The amounts of the following described Fee Nurnbera of Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 are amended to read as follows: ORD SEC. PURPOSE OF AMOUNT FEE NO. NO. NO. FEE/CHARGE - 1111 3(a) Water Service ' 39b 39 c -- 2. 3. $1.10 gross or $1.00 net per 100 cubic feet for Morningside area East: side of Beard Ave. from W. S4th Street to Fuller Street and both sides of Abbott Place from Id. 54th Street to Beard Ave. $1.10 gross or $1.00 net Fer 100 cubic feet for Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. 8 Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. . Ayes: Iiredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Rollcall : Nays: None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST : r 'g *He,- ;Lu i2A-4 City Clerk I MRS. SALLY TANG'S NME SUBMITTED FOR MEBIBERSHIP ON METROPOLITAN COUNCIL HEALTH BOARD. Being advised by the Clerk that Mrs. Sally Tang has agreed to have her name submitted for membership on the Metropolitan Council Health Board, Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Turner directing the Clerk to write a letter of nomination to the Metropolitan Council. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. J. l?. DALEN, RUSSELL HEDLUND NAMED DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBM KATE AUTHORITY. adoption : Member Richards offered the following resolution and moved Its RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE , DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: J. N. Dalen is hereby designated as a Director of the Suburban Rate Authority, and Russell Hedlund is hereby designated as Alternate Director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1982 and until their successors are appointed. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall : Ayes : Bredesen,' Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None ResolutPon adopted. I KENNETH E. ROSLAND/J. N. DALEN NAMED DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO LOGIS. Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO LOGIS BE IT RZSOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: Kenneth E. Rosland is hereby designated as a Director of LOGIS and J. N. Dalen is hereby designated as Alternate Director of LOGIS their successors are appointed. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. for the year 1982 and until Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES DESIGNATED FOR CITY. resolution and moved its adoption: BE IT XE3OLVED that the First Edina National Bank, Edina, Minnesota, First South- dale National Bank, Edina, Minnesota, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, Minnesota, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Edina, Minnesota, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, Ninnesota, and Northwestern National Bank of Hopkins, Edina, Minnesota, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and are hereby designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1983. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Efember Bredesen offered the following RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES I Rollcall : Nays: None Resolution adopted. . Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney SIGNATORY RESOLUTION ADOPTED. and moved its adoption: BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City of Edina be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this muni- cipality in the transaction of any banking business with First Edina National .. Bank, First Southda1.e National Bank, Americana State Bank, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, First National Bank of 3linneapolis and the Northwestern National 'Bank of Hopkins (hereinafter referred to as The Banks) from time to time and Member Bredesen offered the following resolution SIGNATORY RESOLUTION 1/4/82 ' . until rritten notice t any bank to the contrary, to sign che 9 ks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Trensurer. Each bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any checks against such account which is signed as above described, whether or not said chcck is payable to the order of, or deposited to the Credit of, any officer or officers of the City, including the signer of signers of the check. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney ..Nays: None Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS ADOPTED. Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that use of facsimile signatures by the following names persons: - C. WAYNE COURTNEY - WIOR KENNETH E. ROSLAND - CITY MANAGER J. N. DALEN - CITY TREASUWR on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant-checks, vouchers or other orders on public funds deposited in First Edina National Bank, First Southdale National Bank Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, First National Bank of Minneapolis and Northwestern National Bank, be and hereby is approved, and that each of said named persons may authorize Said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may desig- nate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instru- ments so honored shall be wholly perative and binding in favor of said deposi- tory bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his authority. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND APPROVED FOR FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK. its adoption: Member Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNPENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND (FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK) BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina. Knnesota, approves - -- the assignment by its depository, the First Edina National Bank, of the follow- ing securities as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository: $ 50,000 East Grand Forks Mn Var Piirp Due 2-1-82 70,000 65,000 100,000 100,000 75,000 100,000 150,000 100,000 75,000 150,000 200,000 $1,235,000 Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. Washington County Oregon SD #l5 Due 2-1-83 Lancaster County Nebraska SD f161 Due 8-15-83 Hopkins Mn Improvement Due 1-1-84 Bloomington Xn ISD 1'1271 Due 2-1-85 Washington Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax Rev. Ser. A Due 3-1-85 Cook County Main TWP HSD #207 Due 12-1-85 Manchester MI Var. Purp. Due 12-1-85 Washington Sub. San. Dist. MD. Var. Purp. Due 7-1-86 Bloomington MN Var. Purp. Cue 7-1-87 Harford County Maryland Var. Purp. Due 9-1437 Oregon Var. Purp, Due 1-1-95 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BANK OF EDINA ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES APPROVED. Member Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND (FIRST SOUTHDALE NATIONAL BAM OF EDINA) BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edi.na, Minnesota, approves *. 1/4/82 the assigninent by its depository, the First Sout..dale National Bank o Edina, of the following securities as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds deposited in said depository : DESCEIPTION Pontiac School District Wch White Bear Lake ISD a624 "I Pennsylvania Var Purp Baltimore Co Maryland Var Purp Yo10 Co Calif Flood Control Di Cowlitz Co Wash Var Purp Osseo Minn ISD #279 Anne Arundel Co BID Var Purp Deer River ISD a317 MN Bumsville Minn Var Purp Beaver Co PA PHA DUE PAR VALUE - RATE 4.700 04-01-82 $ 50,000.00 3.100 6.750 5.900 St #4 4.750 5.100 - 5.750 5.700 5.750 5.700 02-01-83 03-0 1-84 09-01-86 02-0 1-87 0 7 -0 1-9 0 0 1-0 1-94 02-0 1-94 02 -0 1 -9 4. 02-01-94 10,000 .oo 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 20,000.00 150,000.00 200,000.00 50,000 .OO 150,000.00 5.250 06-0 1-95 50-000.00 TOTAL $980.000.00 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall ; Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. FIRST BANK NINNEAPOLIS ASSIGWIENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND APPROVED. Member Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND (FIRST BANK "IhWEAPOLIS) BE IT PaSOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves the assigninent by its depository, First Bank Minneapolis, of the following sec- urities as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edir-a Public Funds deposited in said depository: $300,000 $650,000 Pontiac Mi SD Bldg & Site @ 4.800 due 12-01-86 Cook & Will Counties SD #206 ILL @ 6.100 due 01-01-87 $217,770 .OO 514,215.00 TOTAL $731,985 .OO Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. 'RpLlcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. . SOUTHImST FIDELLTY STATE BfiX OF EDINA ASSIGh'MENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND APPROVED. ' Member Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES IN LIEU OF BOND (SOUTHWEST FIDELITY STL4TE BANK OF EDINA) BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves The assignment by its depository, the Southwest Fidelity State Bank of Edina, of the following securities as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Eciina Public Funds-deposited in said depository : PRESENT BAL. ORIGINAL AMOUNT -. $47,605.11 $50,000.00 38,665.29 45,000.00 71,336.67 72,750.00 60,688.03 65,000.00 32.818.08 35,000.00 . 76,111.03 78,600 00 -. -. . 64 ,, 104.62 65,500.00 .. DATE DUE Sept. 2006 Dec. 1998 Jan. 2008 Apr. 2002 Sept. 1988 Apr. 2007 Nov. 2007 NAME AND ADDRESS Anthony &. Dolores Ball 13062 Herald Court Apple Valley, IN 55124 Glen Blanchard Route 3, Box 465 Mound, MN 55364 Thomas M, Bonner (Manzer) 2613 102nd St. Bloomington, MN 55437 John & Margaret Cedarberg 4530 Cedar Crest Lane Eagan, MN 55121 ~ Jerry Clark 10700 Cave11 Road Bloomington, MN 55438 Beverly & Douglas Dah1 10320 Toledo Circle Bloomington, BN 55437 John & Elizabeth Evers 2390 75th St. E. Inver Grove Heights, $IN 55075 1/4/82 60 '0 m 0 5 5 75,704.33 80,000.00 Dec. 2002 63,963.52 65,000.00 2005 59 , 014. OS 60,000.00 Rug. ZOOS 48,420.59 50,000.00 July 2007 58,228.61 60 , 000.00 July 2007, $696,660.28 Thecdore Giannobile 5708 View Lane Edina, MN 55436 Richard & Debra Howarth 1296 Raspberry Court Eagan, MN 55122 James & Lavonnie Kelley lL13 Muir Lane Burnsville , PIPI 55337 Jeffrey Richards 3635 James Avc. Deephaven, MN 55391 Kevin Turner 5223 W. 11th St. Blocmington, MN 55437 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by MemberTurner. Rollcall : Ayes : Bredesen, Richards , Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. . .I . PARAMEDIC TRA?7SPORTATIUR FEES SET. Mr. Rosland recalled that, at the time fees were set for 1982, the fee for paramedic transportation services was purposely omitted as the County had not set its fee. now indicated that it will increase its fees to $165.00 and recommended an increase in City fees from $122.00 to $155.00. care will pay about $20-$25 and those on Medicare who have no insur- ance and have limited financial means will be handled on a case by case basis. Mr. Rosland pointed out that no increase in the cost of City rates has been made since 1980, and that it proposed to adjust the fees annually from now on. No objections being head, Member Richards offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: He explained that the County has Under this plan, those on Medi- ' RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Vinnesota, that, as of January 1, 1982,. a fee of $155.00 will be charged far Z'aramedic Transportation Ser-Jicc. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded 3y Member Richards. . Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. I PART TIMJl SALARY SCHEDULE ADOPTED. for part time salaries. not receiving the same salary increase as regular employees. explained that the fact that the City has no difficulty in obtaining seasonal help seems to indicate that fair salaries are being paid. employees who have returned for the third year have been given an increase' inasmuch as they are worth more to.the City. thinks that if the scale is kept at the lower rate, more young people could be hired. BE IT RESOLVED that the following part time year round and seasonal payL.rates be established: Mr. Rosland presented a proposed schedule Member Richards questioned why part time employeees are Mr. Rosland He pointed out that Member Bredesen said that he He then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING PART TIME SALARIES '. .. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Managerial - 5.75 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 L6vel 5 Year Round Level A 3.60'- 3.95 4.15 4.40 4.75 Level B 4 .OO 4.50 4.80 4.95 5.05. Seasonal 3.35 3.60 3.75 . 3.50 3.80 4.00 3.80 4.10 4.25 4.13 4.35 4.50 4.25 5.50 Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards (who said that he believes that the wages are inadequate. Resolution adopted. 1/4/82 '?lo further business appearing, the Mayor declared tlie meeting adjourned. - ~ Adjournment at 8 : 12 p ,m. . .