Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19820621_regularMINUTES EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HAG JUNE 21, 1982 OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Courtney. PRIME DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ZONING GRANTED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Not- ice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the petition of Prime Development Corporation for R-1 Residential District to POD-1 Planned Office District for a 4.8 acre site gen, erally located in the Northeast quadrant of County Road 18 and W. 7th Street. He advised that the site is surrounded by Van Valkenburg Park on the East and across the street, Grandview Cemetery on the North and across the street and by vacant land which is zoned office and multiple residential district to the South and across the street, and recalled that, several months ago, the Bffice District zoning request of Mr. Darrel Farr had been withdrawn. Mr. Hughes advised that the Community Development and Planning Commission had reviewed plans for this project which consists of a townhouse style office development of one story designed for 34 individual medical and dental offices containing 40,750 square feet of floor area, and stressed that the City's ongoing parking' requirement for this project will be based upon the actual number of doctors, rather than on floor area, and that the leasing of the units may be somewhat restricted because of this requirement. He noted also his concern about the fact: that the rear of the development will be oriented toward the street and said that treatment of the rear of these buildings in terms of building materials, land- scaping, garbage storage, etc., should be carefully considered at the time the .:-. final plans are reviewed. Planning Commission had recommended preliminary rezoning approval subject to 1) final plat being conditioned on acceptable overall development plans; and 2) an easement or fee ownership must be dedicated to allow access to Van Valkenburg Park. He clarified that, if the fee ownership is dedicated, this should repre- sent a credit toward the developer's subdivision dedication requirement. Mr. Chuck Tuchfarber of Prime Development Corporation, advised that 30 to 35 doctors will practice at this complex and that parking as planned will be adequate. further discussion being heard, Member Schmidt offered Ordinance No. 811-A164 for First Reading as follows: Mr. Hughes advised that the Community Development and NO ORDINANCE NO. 811-Al64 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED OPFICE DISTRICT Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section 8 of Ordinance No. 811 is amended by "The extent of the Planned OEfkce Distridt (Shb-District. PODirl) is enlarged THE CITY '.COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: adding the following thereto: by the addition of the.following property: (See description in Exhib1t.h attached hereto and-made a part of these finutes.) and publication. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage ORDINhCE NO. 811-A162 GRANTED SECOND READING. Mr. Hughes presented Ordinance No. 811-A162 for Second Reading, recalling that this matter had been continued from June 7, 1982, so that the developer would have an opportunity to develop different plans which would be more acceptable to the City. Mr. M. H. Haymaker, the developer, showed graphics which indicated comparisons with the height of the proposed building with other dwellings in the area. the issue of increased property density.as it relates particularly to City parks and suggested that this be studied at a future time. called to a petition signed by 17 residents in the neighborhood which urged Council to approve the zoning. Schmidt offered Ordinance No. 811-A162 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows, subject to conditions recommended by the Community Development and Planning Commission, which recommendations are as follows: 1) The choice of plant materials (i.e. jun5pers and amur maples) for the South and West property boundaries should be replaced with half trees or a taller hedge material for screening purposes; 2) The plant material (i.e. blud sprue4 proposed for the parking lot island should be replaced by deciduous trees or shrubs; conifer materials should be specified by height rather than by diameter; ing retaining wall located in the*Northeast corner of the property should be entirely removed; as an alternative, the most Northeasterly projection of the wall should be relocated back from the curb and the entire wall should be upgraded; 4) Separate, individual sewer and water services must be provided to each unit; 5) Surface drainage of the drives and parking areas must be Member Richards questioned Council's attention was No further discussion being heard, Member 3) The exist- 6/2 1/82 114 .. storm sewered, rather than surface drained. ORDINANCE NO. 811-A162 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED I?ESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PRD-3) .* Paragraph 4 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MIrJNESOTA, ORDAINS: enlarged by adding the following thereto : enlarged by the addition of the following property: Section 1. "The extent of the Planned Residential District (Sub-District PRD-3) is ' Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Grandview Heights (which is in Subdistrict PRD-3) : Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Says: None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST : CORKINS ADDITION GRANTED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL'. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented Corkins Addition for preliminary Elat approval, recalling that this plat had been referred back to the Community Development and Planning Commission for review of the entire area. Council was reminded that the subdivision is: generally located in the Southeast quadrant of Schaefer Road and Interlachen Blvd. and that it is proposed that Lot 1 be retained for the existing dwelling on the site, with Lots 2 and 3 to measure 21,641 square feet and 26,065 square feet respectively. Mr. Hughes presented graphics which illustrate a "small lot" and- a "large lot" subdivision of the Blake-Schaefer area, with the "small lot'' alter- native illustrating the rear portion of each Schaefer Road lot being split into two lots measuring about 80 feet in width by an average approximate depth of 170 feet (lots on the Boos property to the East would be slightly larger). "large lot" alternative illustrated the rear yard of each Schaefer Road lot be- ing split to provide one new lot which would measure aporoximatelv 160 bv 170 feet, as would the Boos lots. Recalling Council's concern that a future request might be submitted for subdividing Lot 1, Mr. Hughes said that such a subdivision would require a new access to the existing dwelling and emphasized that the 80 foot setback requirement from Schaefer Road may influence the desirability of such a subdivision. be particularly precedence setting in the area, and recommended that, if Council is comfortable with the Oak Pond lots sizes, the plat should be approved as sub- mi_tted. He added that a two lot plat should be required if the large lot envie.. ronment ofschaefer Road should be preserved. Mr. Robert Corkins, 6321 Inter=--. lachen Blvd., said that the proposed lots compare favorably in size with Taft, Oak Ponds and Evanswood Additions and said that, because the lots are difficult to maintain, 211 of the large lots will have to be divided in the future. further discussion being heard, Member Richards offered the following resolution and-moved its adoption: .: - The He advised that he does not believe that the proposed plat will NO RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL FOR CORKINS ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that certain plat known as Corkins Addition, platted by Robert Corkins, and presented for preliminary approval at .the Edina City Council Meeting of June 21, 1982, be and is hereby granted prelim- inary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays:' None 3esolution adopted. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDNENT TO PROVIDE FOR SPECIAL USE PERMTTS IN R-1 DISTRICT CONTINUED TO NEXT HEETING. was seconded by Member Bredesen, continuing discussich on the zoning ordinance amendment to provide for Special Use'Permits for certain uses in public buildings in the R-1 Residential District to July 12, 1982. As recommended by Mr. Rosland, Member Schmidt's motion Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Ebtion carried. ' 6/21/82 EXHIBIT A- That part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 246, Files of Regis- trar of Titles, County 05 IIeniiepin, lying Southerly of the following dekcribed line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 50 minutes 05 seconds East, along the Northerly line of said tract, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 170.32 feet, along a non-tangential curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 229.06 feet and a central angle of 42 degrees 36 minutes 08 seconds, the chord of said curve is 166.42 feet in length and bears South 69 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East; thence North 89 degrees 16 minutes 06 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 192.85 feet; thence southeasterly a distance of 171.16 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 170.00 feet and a central angle of 57 degrees 41 minutes 13 seconds, to the Southerly line of said Tract A and said line there terminating. Except that part of the above described property lying Westerly of the following described line: mencing at the Northwest corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 50 minutes 05 seconds East, along the Northerly line of said Tract A, a distance of 29.73 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence South 11 degrees 52 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 2.82 feet; thence Southerly a distance of 145.83 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 914.93 feet and a central angle of 9 degrees 07 min- utes 56 seconds, to the Southerly line of said Tract A, and said line there terminating. Also all of the following described tract: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 246, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. Except that part %which lies Westerly of a line hereinafter referred to as Line "A'! drawn parallel with and distant 40 feet Easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the West line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 117, Range 21, distant 33.02 feet North of the Southwest comer thereof; thence run Easterly at an angle of 91 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds cas measured from North to East) with said West line for a distance of 247.08 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 102 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for a distance of 18.29 feet; thence deflect to the left along a tangential curve having a radius of 954.93 feet (delta angle of 17 degrees 28 minutes 06 seconds) for a distance of 291.14 feet; thence tangent to said curve for a distance of 67.86 feet; thence deflect to the right, along a tangential curve having a radius of 954.93 feet (delta angle of 17 degrees 20 minutes 01 seconds) for a distance of 288.89 feet and there ter- minating. referred to as Line "B" drawn parallel with and distant 40 feet North of the fol- lowing described line: Beginning at a point on the West line of said Northwest Quarter distant 33.02 feet North of the Southwest comer thereof; thence run Easterly at an angle of 91 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds (as measured from North to East) with said West line for a distance of 617.74 feet and there terminating. Also except that part of said tract lying East of a line hereinafter referred to as Line ''C" drawn parallel with and distant 30 feet West of the following des- cribed line and its Southerly extension: of said Northwest Quarter distant 33.02 feet North of the Southwest comer thereof; thence run Easterly at an angle of 91 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds (as measured from North to East) with said West line for a distance of 617.74 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 91 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds for a distance of 410.38 feet; thence deflect to the left along a tangential curve having a radius of 200.0 feet (delta angle 89 degrees 17 minutes 20 seconds) for a distance of 311.68 feet and there terminating. Also except that part of said tract lying South- westerly of a curve having a radius of 35 feet, said curve beiiig concave to the Northeast and tangent to said Line "A" and to said Line "B" . Also except that part of said tract lying Southeasterly of a curve having a radius of 110 feet, said curve being concave to the Northwest and tangent to said Line "B" and to said Line "C" . Com- I Also except that part of said tract lying South of a line hereinafter Beginning at a point on the West line * 6/21/82 I15 PART OF R.L.S. 1275 (AND UNPLATTED PROPERTY) DIVISION CONTINUED. As recommended by Mr. Hughes, Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Brcdesen, continu- ing indefinitely the division of part of R.L.S. 1278 (and unplatted property) generally located in the Southwest quadrant of W. 66th Street and T.H. 100. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. LOTS 18 AND 19 BLOCK 2, FAIRFAX ADDITION EASEMENT VACATED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hoffman presented the request for partial vacation of a utility easement located in Lots 18 and 19, Block 2, Fairfax Addition and advised that neither the City or the utility companies have any objections. No discussion being heard, Member Richards offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 17th day of May, 1982, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement for utility purposes ; and WHEWS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 21st day of June, 1982, at which time all persons desir- ing to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said easement vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portiqn of the utility easement be and is hereby vacated, effective June 22, 1982: That portion of an easement created by deed of record in Book of Deeds 1927 page 602 that reads as follows: a three foot strip along the side line thereof when necessary to gain access to the 5 foot strip in the rear"; also known as Southerly three feet of Lot 19, Block 2, except Easterly five feet thereof and the Northerly three feet of Lot 18, Block 2, except Easterly five feet thereof, Fairfax "Also the same right is reserved in Addition. Motion for adoption of the resolution Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Nays: None Resolution adopted. was seconded by Member Schmidt. Turner, Courtney TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JUNE 15, 1982, REVIEWED. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, accepting Sections B and C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 15, 1982, and approving the following recommenda- tions in Section A: 1) Installation of a STOP sign for Northbound Wnnehaha Blvd. traffic at W. 52nd Street; 2) Installation of NO PARKING SIGNS on the East side of Cahill Road from W. 70th Street to W. 78th Street (See Resolution later in Minutes.) 3) Denial of STOP signs and approval of installation of a crosswalk with appro- priate signing across Cahill Road at hundson Ave. Ayes : Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. Member Bredesen thereupon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION FROM W. 78th STREET TO MILL ROAD IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA RELATING TOi.PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S .A.P 120-156-02 WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the improvement of MSAS 156 (Cahill Road), from W. 78th Street to W. 70th Street; and WHEREAS, the City will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement of this street; and WHEREAS, this improvement does not 'provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must, therefore, be conditioned upon certain parking restric- tions; and . WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary prerequisite ,- 6/21/82 to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the City has been determined; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Edina shall restrict the parking of motor vehicles on- the East side of MSAS 156 (Caliill Road) at all times. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Xeinber Schmidt. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. I GOLF DOHE IN BRAEMAR PARK DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised Council of the possi-. bility of constructing a golf dome in Braemar Park, suggesting that it could be located in the parking lot immediately across the road from the Golf Maintenance Building. He explained that this would be a private venture under which the City would take a land lease guaranteeing $3,000 annually, plus 3% of the gross profit between $150,000 to $250,000, 4% of the gross profit from $250,000 to $350,000 and 5% of the gross profit of anything over $350,000. Edina would take in approximately $8,000 to $10,000 annually. plained that a project of this type would provide a type of recreation facility which could be used by senior citizens, for a 16" softball field and for jogging during off hours, along with the use as a driving range. Mr. Rosland also recommended that, because the second tier of the bubble would have to be tom down each year, the developer could afford to pay $6,000 annually toward the cost of a picnic shelter which could be constructed by the City at an esti--' mated cost of $60,000. He further suggested that some of the City's seasonal summer help could work during other times of the year. Mr. Rosland advised that he had visited the only other facility of this type which ks'located in Detroit and that he believes that it would be a real asset for the City. He added that the plans must be approved by July 1, 1982, in order for completion during this building season. Council expressed concern that residents would not have time to react if the project should be approved at this time and asked that the Edina Sun publicize the dome in a news article. Richards' motion was seconded by Member Turner, approving the golf dome in con- cept under the terms outlined by the City Manager and continuing consideration of final:-approval of the project until July 12, 1982. He estimated that Mr. Roslsmd ex- . . Following lengthy discussion, Member Ayes : Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE C0MMISS.ION APPOINTMENTS MADE. Mr. Rosland recalled that on June 7, 1982, Council had approved the CATV Joint Powers Agreement, but had failed to make appointments to the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission. He called Council's attention to a letter from Mr. Peter Stromquist, 7201 York Ave., requesting appointment to the Commission, but pointed out that only members of- the staff and Council could be appointed to serve on this Commission and that he would so advise Mr. Stromquist. Member Schmidt thereupon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING T'HE CITY TO ENTER INTO A JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEIIENT TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION WHEREAS. the City of Edina has granted a franchise to Cablesystems-Southwest - after ha+ing participated in a joint franchising process together with' Cities Tncluding Edina, Eden Prairie, Richfield, Hopkins and finnetonka; and WHEREAS, the cable communications system that will now serve each of the five (5) Cities will benefit from a joint and cooperative effort between the Cities in terms of the ongoing administration and enforcement; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed a Joint and Cooperative Agreement that enables the City to participate together with the other Cities through a Joint Powers Commission; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that a joint and cooperative effort through a .I Joint Powers Commission will best serve the City in terms of its needs pertain- ing to ongoing administration and enforcement of the cable communications sys- tem franchise granted by it; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina, in a regular meeting assembled, resolves as follows: 1. approved and the Mayor is authorized on behalf of the City to execute this Agreement and to forward it to the City Manager of the City of Edina so that the Joint Powers Commission contemplated by the Agreement can be organized and started. 2. That the City Council of the City of Edina approves the proposed start-up costs and the proposed method of budgeting for the balance of 1982. 3. That the following persons are designated to serve on behalf of this City I That the Joint and Cooperative Agreement, attached to this resolution is 6/2 1/82 I\ cy) 08 (d 5 m as Directors and Alternates to the Joint Powers Commission: C. Wayne Courtney - Council. Member/Director A. Charles Bredesen I11 - Alternate Council Member/Director Kenneth E. Rosland - Administrative Appointed Director Mark Bernhardson - Administrative Appointed Alternate Director Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Echards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. YVONNE TERRACE SANITAm SEWER LIFT STATION BIDS AUTHORIZED. As recommended by Mr. Rosland, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, authorizing bids for construction of a gravity line to the Code Lift Station as a replacement for the Yvonne Terrace Sanitary Sewer Lift Station. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER DISCUSSED; TO BE CONTINUED TO JULY 12, 1982. Mr. Rosland called Council's attention to a memorandum to the Council from the Edina Human Relations Commission on the subject of the Edina Community Center. Mrs. Eva Johnson, President of.the Edina Women's Club, spoke to the Council on the need for a site where groups such as the Edina Women's Club could hold their meetings. She emphasized that the Edina Community Center, as it presently exists, is an "educational center", rather than a true "community center", and advised that the Edina Women's Club had.been told that they could use the building after 12:30, but could not use the kitchen until after 2:30 in the afternoon. Mr. Rosland said that he would pass this concern on to the Community Center Committee, and that the Committee will be present at the Council Meeting of July 12, 1982. No formal action was taken. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ANNUAL CONFERENCE NOTED. Member Turner thanked . '- Council for the opportunity to attend the League of Minnesota Cities Annual Con-. ference in Rochester, and advised that MS. Smith had been elected.Treasurer: of Women in City Government and that the Mayor is on the Board. HIPIAN RELATIONS COMMISSION REPORT ENCOURAGED. Member Turner advised that she had attended a Humai Relations Commission Meeting and that she had encouraged members to submit a report on-their extensive review of the South Hennepin Human Services study by September 1, 1982. No action was taken. NOISE ORDINANCE TO BE CONSIDERED. had received relative to loud music coming from houses and from car radios and also from people shooting firecrackers. which he had received objecting to airplane noise. have the staff research noise ordinances and prepare an ordinance for Council consideration. No action was taken. Member Bredesen spoke of a complaint which he Mayor Courtney referred to a letter Mr. Rosland said that he Will POLICE/PARAMEDICS COMMENDED. City, Member Bredesen spoke of the speed and efficiency of the Police and Para-. Advising that he had witnessed an accident in the medics and complimented both departments. PROJECT CHARLIE/STOREFRONT YOUTH ACTION DISCUSSED. Member Richards commented on recent articles in the Edina Sun relative to Project CHarlie and Storefront Youth Action. He reiterated Council's support, noting that he believes that the City has received considerable benefit from these groups. No action was taken. COUNTY LAND FILL DISPOSAL ABATEMENT PROPOSALS NOTED. Council's attention to County Land Fill Disposal Abatement Proposals which he had received, which recommend recycling items which Edina is already recycling. Smith referred to the fact that paper is selling for only $5.00 per ton but pointed out that residents should continue to bring items to the Recycling.Center. No action was taken. Manager Rosland called Ms. VOTING PRECINCT BOUNDARY CORRECTION NOTED. Being advised by the City Clerk that a correction was necessary in the legal description of the boundary between Pre- cinct 8 and Precinct 9 as recorded in the Minutes of April 5, 1982, Member Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: (See correction in Minutes of October 17, 1983.) RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the Council Minutes of April 5, 1982, be corrected to indicate the following legal descriptions for Precinc; 8 and Precinct 9: PRECINCT 8 - Commencing at the intersection of W. 54th Street and Prance Ave., 6/21/82 118 thence West along the centerline of W. 54th Street to the centerline of Brookview Ave.; thence Northerly along the centerline of Brookview Ave, and its Northwesterly extension to W. 52nd Street and Oaklawn Ave.; thence Westerly to the centerline of W. 52nd St. and Wooddale Ave. thence Southerly along the centerline of Wooddale he. to the centerline of W. 54th St.; thence Westerly along the Westerly extcasion of W. 54th St. to the centerline of State Highway 100; thence Southerly along the centerline of State Highway 100 to the centerline of Southview Lane extended West; thence Easterly along the centerline of Southview Lane to the centerline of Con- cord Ave.; thence Southerly along the centerline of Concord Ave. to the centerline . of W. 59th St.; thence Easterly along the centerline of W. 59th St. to the center- line of Oaklawn Ave.; thence Southerly along the centerline of Oaklawn Ave. to the South line of 5905 Oaklawn Ave. extended West; thence Easterly along the South line of 5905 Oaklawn Ave. to the East line of 5905 Oaklawn Ave.; thence Northerly along the East line of 5905 Oaklawn Ave. and its Northerly extension to the centerline of W. 59th St.; thence Easterly along the centerline of W. 59th St. to the centerline of Park Place as platted; thence North along the centerline of Park Place to the centerline of W.. 58th St.; thence Easterly along the centerline of W. 58th St. to the centerline of France Ave.; thence Northerly to the point of beginning. PRECINCT 9 - Commencing at the centerline of France Ave. and W. 58th St.; thence Southerly along the centerline of France Ave. to the centerline of County Road 62; thence Westerly along the centerline of County Road 62-to the centerline of State Highway 100; thence Northerly along the centerline of State Highway 100 to the centerline of Southview Lane extended West; thence Easterly along the center- line of Southview Lzne to the centerline of Concord Ave.; thence Southerly along the centerline of Concord Ave. to the centerline of W. 59th St.; thence Easterly along the centerline of W. 54th St. to the centerline of Oaklawn Ave.; thence Southerly along the centerline of Oaklawn Ave. to the South line of 5905 Oaklawn he. extended West; thence Easterly along the South line of 5905 Oaklawn Ave. to the East line of 5905 Oaklawn Ave.; thence Northerly along the East line of . 5905 Oaklawn Ave. and its Northerly extension to the centerline of W. 59th St.; thence Easterly along the centerline of W. 59th St. to the centerline of Park Place as platted; thence North along the centerline of Park Place to the center- line of W. 58th St.; thence Easterly along the centerline of W. 58th St. to the point of beginning. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. I Rollcall : Ayes : Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Xesolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID. ment of the following Claims as per Pre-List dated June il, 1982: $84,624.21; Park Fund, $28,277.25; Art Center, $1,337.82; Park Construction, $2,480.00; Swimming Pool, $4,422.24; Golf Course, $19,576.83; Arena, $1,978.59.; Gun Range, $20.00; Water Fund, $12,885.92; Sewer Fund, $148,597.93; Liquor Fund, $333,286.74; Construction $135,121.55; Total, $772,609.08. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Schmidt, for pay- General Fund, Ayes: Nays: None Motion carried, Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney The Council's agenda having been covered, Member Bredesen's motion for adjourn- ment was seconded by Member Richards. Adjournment at 8:40 p.m. City Clerk dLd.h