Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19820719_regular.- 124 - MINUTES - OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 19, 1982 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor . Courtney. EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT REFERENDUM DISCUSSED. Dr. Ralph Lieber, Superintendent of Schools, advised that an Edina School District referendum will be held on Tuesday, October 5, 1982,. for approval of a six mill increase in revenue and that he was present to inform Council and answer any questions about the referendum. -He stated he was seeking individual skpport of Council Members as leaders in the community. Dr. Lieber presented graphics showing projected income and expenses for the 1982-83 and 1983-84 school years, with income relatively stable because declining enrollment is so severe that it more than offsets the growth in assessed property valuation, while expenses continue to increase because of two factors: 1) inflation, and 2) rise in unit cost. A deficit.is projected as of June 30, 1984, in excess of $1,600,000 which presents.the Board of Education with two choices: 1) continue to make major cu.ts and severe curtailments in programs and * services, or 2) increase revenue. Dr. Lieber advised that the Board, after careful study and analysis has chosen to increase revenue. He reported that cuts of over $1,000,000 had been made before the start of the 1982-83 school year; and that space in the schools that have been closed is being rented which offsets expenses for the Edina Community Center now located in the Edina East High School building. Dr. Lieber indicated further that if the referendum did not pass that ' further severe cuts would have to be made in addition to those already in effect. . Member Richards suggested that the matter of the School District Referendum be placed on the Council Agenda for September 13, 1982, for discussion after getting feedback from people in the community and so that individual viewpoints could be presented as the date of the referendum approaches. would be placed on that agenda as suggested.. No formal action was taken. I . Manager Rosland stated it ORDINANCES NO. 811-A165 AND NO. R-1 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO PRD-3 AND HRD, PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT'AND 811-A166 GRANTED FIRST R$ADING; MARSHALL EVERSON . HERITAGE PRESERVATION DISTRICT. Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. this site measures 2.11 acres in area; is Zone R-1 Single Family Dwelling District; and 'is bordered by 70th Street on the'north, Cahill Road on.the east, and Village Driye on the south. old St. Patrick's Church is located on the easterly port3on of the site and is now . vacant. Preservation'Board and that the April 27 staff report for the Board recommended that this site and the existing structure should be rezoned to Heritage Preser- vation District (HPD). Mr. Hughes explained that HPD is an "overlay" district, i.e. it does not alter the basic land use zoning district of the site but rather imposes additional restrictions to protect its unique historical, architectural, and/or cultural characteristics. vation Board would then be required for alterations which could affect the special qualities of the building or site. proponent has petitioned for a rezoning of the basic underlying zoning classifi- cation to PRD-3 Planned Residential District illustrating a 22 unit condominium building two stories in height. The existing structure would be preserved and possibly retro-fitted as an "amenity building" for the project. Mr. Hughes advised that the proposed condominium complies with setback requirements and other ordinance provisions; that one and one half under- building garage stalls per unit and .75 exposed stalls are provided; and that plans submitted illustrate a close match of the architectural style of the con- dominium to the existing building. From a density standpoint, the proposed development represents approxiinately 10 1/2 units per acre which is consistant with the 6-12 unit per acre range specified by the Comprehensive Plan. out that the proposed density is somewhat higher than other recent developments in the area Which were evaluated in light of the density reduction formula. formula would yield an allowed density of 8 1/2 units peraacre or a total of 18 units for the site. the preservation of the existing structure on the site. Mr. Hughes noted that HPD zoning would definitely cause some imposition as to further development of the site and it was felt that a bonus of this sort, particularly for preserving the existing building and for designing a condominium with architecture compatible to the existing building, was reasonable. Commission has recommended that the property be rezoned to HPD regardless of the final disposition of the rezoning to PRD-3, and also recommended that it be rezoned to PPa-3 with the following conditions: Affadavits of Notice were presented by Acting Mr. Hughes advised that Cahill Elementary School adjoins the site on the west. The He stated that the site .has been studied extensively by the Heritage If zoned HPD,.permits from the Heritage Preser- In connection with the rezoning to HPD, the Preliminary plans have been submitted He pointed : This The additional density requested represents a bonus for The Community Development and Planning 7 1191 82 I25 1) 2) 3) Subdivision dedication, Final zoning is conditioned upon acceptable overall development plans and a final plat, An additional five foot right of way must be dedicated along Village Drive. '. . Mr. Foster Dunwiddie, Chairman of the Heritage Preservation Board, presented a brief history of St. Patrick's Church, the sole surving building of what was once one of two.early community centers in Edina; the Edina Mills and the Cahill Settlement which focused around the intersection of West 70th Street and Cahill Road. Old St. Patrick's Church was built in 1924 after the previous church was destroyed by fire and remains the last visual evidence'of the Cahill community. The site is equally important because of the 1884 church and location in Cahill. St. Patrick's congregation continued to occupy the building until 1961 when '. they outgrew the facility. Mr. Dunwiddie advised that the Heritage Preservation Board has recommended rezoning of the property to HPD zoning for these reasons: 1) the close association of the church with the Cahill community, 2) the fact that it is a focal point of that community and the last remaining evidence of the nucleus of the Cahill Settlement at that intersection, 3) the structure is an important visual landmark in the community and it is an appropriate structure to commemorate the Cahill community, and 4) the 1924 structure is significant as the earliest remaining unaltered church in Edina. Mr. Dunwiddie stated that the Edina Historical Society had also requested the HPD zoning, and also St. Patrick's Church which had initiated consideration of the property for HPD zoning. He advised that the Heritage Preservation Board would like to review final plans when they are prepared. Mr. Ed Haedecke, 5524 West 70th Street, expressed his concern that by rezoning this property to HPD, we would only be preserving a shell and suggested that the church building be moved to a suitable location where it could be preserved as a church. Mr. Marshall Everson, owner of the subject property, responded that this was discussed but there is no particular spot to move it to and the City cannot maintain it. Also, the site is as important as che building itself for preservation. He stated also that the building,is not being used now as a montessori school, has negative cash flow, that he therefore has to develop the property and this seemed to be the best solution. McCauley commented that his grandfather had settled here in X854 and was one of the men that had actually built the original foundation of the church, and that there is a strong sentiment attached to it by decendents of the original families of the Cahill Settlenent. site. Member Richards expressed his concern relative to the density for the proposed development, stating he supports the rezoning to HE'D and because it impedes the free use of the land there should be some incentive for preserving the building, but that he felt a building of between 18 and 22 units would be Eore consistent with the density reduction formula. Mr. John Glick, architect for the development, responded that the reason for the density bonus is that . development of the property necessitates allocation of funds for restoration and reuse of the building so the cost has to be spread over a larger number of units. He indicated further that the open space requirements for PRD-3 zoning is approximately 8,800 square feet and that the development plans provide 15,000 square feetsof open space which lessens the impact of the additional 4 units on the neighborhood. Member Bredesen stated he would support the Heritage Preser- vation District zoning and the proposed rezoning from R-1 Residential District to PRD-3 Planned Residential District, but before second reading would like to see documentation from the developer in support.of the additional density for the development. Member Schmidt then offered Ordinance No. 811-A165 for First Reading as follows : ' Mr. John He stated he feLt it should remain on the original ORDINANCE NO. 811-A165 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 8ii) BY ADDING TG THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 11 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City of Edina is hereby amended by adding .the following thereto: "Sec. 9. Boundaries of Heritage Preservation District. The boundaries of the Heritage Preservation District shall include the following described property: Commencing at the Northeast 'corner of the Northwest one quarter of Northeast one quarter of the South 15.5 rods, thence West 15.5 rods, thence North 15.5 rods, thence East 15.5 rods to beginning, and Commencing in the.North line of Northwest one quarter of Northeast one quarter at a point 914.4 feet East from the Northwest corner thereof, then South 271.8 feet to North line of South 32 acres of Northwest one quarter of Ndrth- east one quarter, then East to Northeast corner of said 32 acres, then North 16.55 feet, then West 15.5 rods, then North 15.5 rods, then West 161.6 feet to beginning, and other lands which are hereafter added to this paragraph by amendments to this ordinance " 7/19/82 -. Sec. 2. and publication. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage 126 Member Schmidt also offered Ordinance No. 811-A166 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 811-A166 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PRD-3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: and Section 1. "The extent of the Planned Residential District (Sub-District PRD-3) is Commencing at the Northeast corner of the Northwest one quarter of Northeast one quarter of the South 15.5 rods, thence West 15.5 rods, thence North 15.5 rods, thence East 15.5 rods to beginning, and Commending in the North line of Northwest one quarter of Northeast one quarter Paragraph 4 of Section 5 of Ordinance No. 811 of the City is . enlarged by adding the following thereto: enlarged by adding the following thereto: I at a point 914.4 feet East from the Northwest corner thereof, then South 271.8 feet to North line of South 32 acres of Northwest one quarter of North- east one quarter, then East to Northeast corner of said 32 acres, then North 16.55 feet, then West 15.5 rods, then North 15.5 rods, then West 161.6 feet to beginning (which is in Sub-District PRD-3)." Sec. 2. publication. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage ORDINANCE NO. 811-KL64 GRANTED SECOND READING; PRIME PROFESSIONAL CENTER ADDITION PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVED. Acting Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented Affidavits of Notice were presented by Ordinance No. 811-A164 for Second Reading and Prime Professional Center Center Addition for Preliminary and Final Plat approval as requested by the proponent, for property generally located in the Northeast quadrant of County Rd. 18 and West 7th Street. ment plans as noted in the staff report were met by the developer prior to the Community Development and Planning Commission meeting. Also, the developer had presented revised subdivision plans at the meeting which accommodated proposed modifications as follows: back from the frontage road, 2) The plat illustrates two "expansion lots" i.e. lots 35 and 36. These lots should be deleted and incorporated into their abutting lots, and 3) Lot 37 should be an outlot. Mr. Hughes advised that the Conmun'ity Development and Planning Commission had recommended approval of the final rezoning as well as the subdivision with the following conditions: 1) Final rezoning is conditioned on final .platting, 2) Subdivision dedication, should be dedicated to the City and should constitute a credit toward the overall dedication requirement, and 3) A Developer's Agreement f0.r sewer and water mains on the site; easements must also be provided for these utilities. &r. Walter Tuchfarber, proponent, introduced Pat Hagen of Korsunsky-Krank-Erickson Architects, who presented graphics showing site plan, building exterior and elevation, and landscaping. represented approximately 5% of the total acreage of the development. No further discussion being heard, Member Richards offered Ordinance No. 811-A164 for Second Reading and moved its adoption, subject to final platting, as follows; He advised that all of the modifications to the overall develop-- . 1) The individual lots should maintain a 35 foot set- Outlot- C In response to Member Bredesen, Mr. Hughes explained that Outlot C ORDINANCE NO. 811-A164 AN ORDINANCE ANENDING TI ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 811) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. "The extent of the Planned Office District (Sub-District POD-1) is enlarged Paragraph 1 of Section 8 of Ordinance No. 811 is amended by adding the following thereto: by the--addition of the following property: (See description in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part of these Minutes.) Sec. 2. and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Schmidt. This ordinance shall be in full'force and effect upon its passage Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Ordinance adopted. ATTEST : /?fVl&%.WL. Acting City Clerk Member Richards then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: I . 71 19/82 . '% 127 EXHIBIT A- That part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 246, Files of Regis- trar of Titles, County of Hennepin, lying Southerly of the following described line: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 50 minutes 05 seconds East, along the Northerly line of said tract, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 170.32 feet, along a non-tangential curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 229.06 feet and a central angle of 42 degrees 36 minutes 08 seconds, the chord of said curve is 166.42 feet in lepgth and bears South 69 degrees 25 minutes 50 seconds East; thence North 89 degrees 16 minutes 06 seconds East, tangent to said curve, a distance of 192.85 feet; thence Southeasterly a distance of 171.16 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of 170.00 feet and a central angle of 57 degrees 41 minutes 13 seconds, to the Southerly line of said Tract A and said line there terminating. Except that part of the above described property lying Westerly of the following described line: Com- mencing at the Northwest corner of said Tract A; thence on an assumed bearing of North 88 degrees 50 minutes 05 seconds East, along the Northerly line of said ' Tract A, a distance of 29.73 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence South 11 degrees 52 minutes 29 seconds East a distance of 2.82 feet; thence Southerly a distance of 145.83 feet, along a tangential curve concave to the East having a radius of 914.93 feet and a central angle of 9 degrees 07 min- utes 56 seconds, to the Southerly line of said Tract A, and said line there terminating. Also all of the'following described tract: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 246, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin. Except that part which lies Westerly of a line hereinafter referred to as Line "A'! drawn parallel with and distant 40 feet Easterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the West line of the Northwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 117, Range 21, distant 33.02 feet North of the Southwest comer thereof; theace run Easterly at an angle of 91 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds Cas measured from North to East) with said West line for a distance of 247.08 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 102 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for a distance of 18.29 feet; thence deflect to the left along a tangential curve having a radius of 954.93 feet (delta angle of 17 degrees 28 minutes 06 seconds) for a distance of 291.14 feet; thence tangent to said curve for a distance of 67.86 feet;' thence deflect to the reght, along a tangential curve having a radius of 954.93'feet (delta angle of 17 degrees 20 minutes 01 seconds) for a distance of 288.89 feet and there ter- minating. referred to as' Line "B" drawn. parallel with and distant 40 feet North of the fol- lowing described line: Quarter distant 33.02 feet North of the Southwest comer thereof; thence run Easterly at an angle of 91 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds (as measured from North to East) with said West line for a distance of 617.74 feet and there terminating. Also except that part of said tract lying East of a line hereinafter referred to as Line "C" drawn parallel with and distant.30 feet West of the following des- cribed line and its Southerly extension: of said Northwest Quarter distant 33.02 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof; thence run Easterly at an angle of 91 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds (as measured from North to East) with said West line for a distance of 617.74 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence deflect to the left at an angle of 91 degrees 42 minutes 10 seconds for a distance of 410.38 feet; thence deflect to the left along a tangential curve having a radius of 200.0 feet (delta angle 89 degrees 17 minutes 20 seconds) for a distance of 311.68 feet and there terminating. westerly of a curve having a radius of 35 feet, said curve being concave to the Northeast and tangent to said Line "A" and to said Line "23". Also except that part of said tract lying Southeasterly of a curve having a radius of 110 feet, said curve being concave to the Northwest and tangent to said Line "B" and to said Line "C" . Also except that part of said tract lying South of a line hereinafter Beginning at a point on the West line of said Northwest Beginning at a point on the West line Also except that part of said tract lying South- 7 / 19 182 . ,128 RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR PRIME PROFESSIONAL CENTER ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that certain plat known as Prime Professional Center Addition, platted by Prime Development Corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 19, 1982, be and is hereby granted preliminary and final plat: approval, subject to the granting of a deed for Outlot C to the City, payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $22,000 and execution of a Developer's Agreement and easements for sewer and water mains on'the site. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney * Nays: None Resolution adopted. I ZAMANSKY ADDITION GRANTED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented Zamansky Addition for preliminary plat approval, advising that the property is generally located in the southwest quadrant of West 66th Street and T.H. 100, and was on the Council agenda on June 7, 1982, for a lot division. facing West 66th Street and desired to acquire the rear portion of the Strand property which fronts on the west frontage road of T.H. 100. concern that the parcel being acquired by Mr. Zamansky could be considered build- able in the future even though street frontage was not provided and had continued the matter. To resolve this concern, Mr. Zamansky has agreed to plat the property and designate the parcel being purchased as an outlot. According to the subdivi- sion ordinance, outlots are not developable until further platted into lots and blocks. The Community Development and planning Commission recommends approval of the plat. resolution and moved its adoption: The request was made by Mr. Ronald Zamansky who lives on the lot Council had expressed No one appearing to be heard, Member Schmidt offered the following * ' RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR ZAMANSKY ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that certain plat known as Zamakky Addition, platted by Ronald A. Zamansky and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 19, 1982, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards,' Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. I NUCLEAR WEAPONS FREEZE CONTINUED TO AUGUST 16, 1982. Mr. Rosland advised that . the Res. Andy Overman has requested this matter be continued to the Council meeting of August 16, 1982. . Turner to continue the discussion of nuclear weapons freeze to the CouncZl . meeting of August 16, 1982. - Motion of Member Schmidt was seconded by Member Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. BID AijmED FOR HIGH SPEED COPIER. for a high speed copier showing IBM as low bidder at $33,015.00, Xerox at $44,841.00, and Kodak at $50,308.00. Member Turner's motion for award Of bid to recommended low bidder, IBM at $33,015.00, was seconded by Member Schmidt. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids' Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 1 Nays: None .. I TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINJJTES OF JULY 13, 1982, REVIEWED. the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 13, 1982, as to the speed limit on Vernon Ave., Member Turner expressed concern about traffic signalization at Vernon and Tracy Avenues and said'that .she Eelt this was an important part of the solution. reduction of the speed limit. - Bredesen, approving the-Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 13, 1982, accepting Section B. During review of Mr. Hoffman responded that this issue would be considered following Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member and- Ayes: Ayes: None Motion carried. L Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Member Bredesen then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Vernon Avenue between High 100 and Gleason Road is County Road 158, and Gleason Road between Vernon Avenue and Crosstown Highway 62 is also County Road 158; and 71 191 82 HEARING DATE SET FOR'SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt to set September 20, 1982, as As recommended by Mr. Rosland, Member WHEREAS, citizens adjacent to and in nearby residential areas are concerned about the speed of traffic on Vernon Avenue/Gleason Road (C.S.A.H. 158); and WHEREAS, the above said citizens have appeared before the Edina Traffic Safety Committee and the Edina City Council with their concerns; and WHEREAS, the current speed limit on C.S..A,H. 1.58 is 40 MPH on the majority of the route; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council requests that Hennepin County reduce the speed limit on C.S.A.H. 158 from 40 MPH to 30 MPH. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. SANITARY SEWER FOR 6610 AND 6620-NORMANDALE ROAD AUTHORIZED. Mr. Rosland reported that a petition for Sanitarv Sewer to serve 6610 and 6620 Nomiandale " Road had been received, signed by thk property owners. requested the Council to assess the entire costagainst the property of said owners. Mr. Rosland presented estimated construction cost for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. P-SS-365 at $12,092.47.to be assessed against two lots at an estimated cost per assessable lot of $6,048.24. Member Turner offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: Said petitian also As recommended by Mr. Rosland, RESOLUTION ORDERING SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEI~ENT NO. SS-365 UPON PETITION THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct Sanitary Sewer Improvement to serve 6610 and 6620 Nor- mandale Road, and to assess the entire cost against the property of petitioners, and that said petition has been signed by all owners of real property to be served by said improvement. 2. ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of * 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties served by said improvement, Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-365 Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney * Nays: None Resolution adopted. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-365 BID AWARDED. Mr. Rosland presented tabu- lation of bids for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-365 to serve 6610 and 6620 Normandale Road, showing Kirkwold Construction Company as low bidder at $9,635.48, G. L. Contracting, Inc. at $12,392.70, and Richfield Pulmbing having submitted no bid. Member Schmidt's motion for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Kirkwold Construction Company at $9,635.48, was seconded by Member Richards. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. ON-SALE WINE LICENSING DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland briefly reviewed his memorandum of July 16, 1982, regarding on-sale wine licensing in which he had included City Attorney Erickson's interpretation of the State Statutes concerning this subject and had listed possible alternatives for Council to consider. considerable discussion, it was the concensus of the Ccuncil to take no formal action on the issue at this time. Following CANDIDATE FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE FOR DISTRICT 42A INTRODUCED. Member Schmidt introduced Mrs. Sidney Pauly and advised Council that Mrs. Pauly is the Indepen- dent-Republican candidate for State House of Representatives for District 42A, which encompasses parts of Edina and Eden Prairie. the hearing date for special assessments. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID. of the following Claims as per Pre-List: General Fund, $44,704.41; Park Fund, $256.17; Art Center, $5,425.99; Golf Course, $839.20; Recreation, $150.00; Water, $738.79; Sewer, $701.89; Liquor Fund, $130,088.60; Construction, $201,820.57; Total, $384,725.62. Motion of Member Bredeson was seconded by Member Richards for payment Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. No further business appearing, the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. I -3%-k%.U Acting City Clerk .. ..