Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout19820920_regular163 MINUTES OF THE REGULARMEETING OF THE ,, EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL / SEPTEMBER 20, 1982 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. WELLNESS WEEK/EMPLOYEE HEALTH DAY PROCLAMATION ISSUED. following proclamation: Mayor Courtney iss.ued the _- PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, there is an increasing awareness on the part of individuals of the need to assume greater responsibility for their own well being and greater involvement in health care decision making; and WHEREAS, health promotion and wellness are practical, promising and beneficial approaches to curbing the upward spiral of health care costs; and WHEREAS, Albert H. Quie, Governor of the State of Minnesota, has proclaimed October 3 through October 9, 1982, to be Wellness Week; NOW, THEREFORE, the Edina City Council does hereby proclaim October 3 through October 9, 1982, to be and October 7, 1982 to be in the City of Edina, Minnesota. Member Bredesen recalled the dedication of the Vita Course around Lake Cornelia and Mr. Rosland described activities which will take place in connection with WELLNESS WEEK EMPLOYEE HEALTH DAY 4 0 a 7 Employee Health Day. No formal action was taken. I d: . PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON NUMEROUS ASSESSMENTS. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Due notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as herein- after recorded - on the following proposed assessments : West Highwood Drive in Emerald Woods Addition West Highwood Drive in Emerald Woods Addition West Highwood Drive in Emerald Woods Addition 1. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-345 IN THE FOLLOWING: 2. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-360 IN THE FOLLOWING: 3. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S-168 Improvements listed under 1, 2 and 3 above affecting the same properties, public hearings were conducted concurrently. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assess- ment for Watermain Improvement No. WM-345 showing total construction cost of $12,514.96, proposed to be assessed against 8 assessable lots at $1,564.37, against estimated assessment of $1,509.89. Sewer Improvement No. SS-360 was given showing total construction cost of $28,959.04, proposed to be assessed against 8 assessable lots at $3,619.88 per lot, against estimated assessment of $4,630.74 per assessable lot. Mr; Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. ST.S-168 showing total construction cost of $12,907.80, proposed to be assessed against 9 assess- able lots at $1,434.20, against estimated assessment of $1,712.22 per assessable lot. Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) Analysis of Assessment for Sanitary No objections were heard and none had been received prior hereto. (See 4. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S-167 IN THE FOLLOWING: Oak Ponds of Interlachen GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C-135 IN THE FOLLOWING: Oak Ponds of Interlachen Oak Ponds of Interlachen Oak Ponds of Interlachen 5. 6. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-359 IN THE FOLLOWING: 7. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-344 IN THE FOLLOWING: Improvements listed under 4, 5, 6 and 7 affecting the same properties, public hearings were conducted concurrently. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assess- ment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. ST.S-167 showing total construction cost at $25,057.56, proposed to be assessed against 11 assessable lots at $2,277.96 against estimated assessment of $2,576.79 per assessable lot. He presented total construction cost of Grading and Graveling Improvement No. C-135 at $18,856.75, proposed to be assessed against 11 assessable lots at $1,714.25 Per lot against estimated assessment of $1,421.99. Mr. Rosland presented total construction cost for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS-359 at $17,472.73, Pro- posed to be assessed against 11 assesSable lots at $1,588.43 per lot, against estimated assessment of $1,922;94 per lot. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis Of Assessment for Watermain Improvement No. 344 showing total construction Cost of $17,374.94, proposed to be assessed against 11 assessable lots at $1,579054 per lot against estimated assessment of $2,258.05. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. $ee Resolution Ordering Assessments later in Minutes.) 9120182 I64 8. 9. 10. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. C-132 IN THE FOLLOWING: Vernon Court from Vernon Ave. to cul-de-sac f SANITARY SEWER IMPROVE~NT NO. SS-356 IN THE FOLLOWING: Vernon Court from Vernon Ave. to cul-de-sac Vernon Court from Vernon Ave. to cul-de-sac WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-340 IN THE FOLLOWING Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost for Street Improvement No. C-132 at $111,516.28, proposed to be assessed against 210,600 assessable square feet at $.529517 square foot. ment SS-356 showing total construction cost of $38,009.89, proposed to be assessed against 220,980 square feet at $.172006 per assessable foot against estimated assessment at $ .175 pe.2 assessable square foot. of Assessment for Watermain Improvement No. TJM-340 showing total cost of $26,596.46 proposed to be assessed against 210,600 square feet at $.126289’.per assessable fo.ot against estimated assessment of $.192 per assessable square foot. (See Resolution Ordering Assessments later in Minutes.) 11. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-241 IN THE FOLLOWING : Mr. Rosland presented total construction cost at $25,602.12, proposed to be assessed against 9 lots at a cost of $2,844.68 per assessable lot against esti- mated assessment of $4,646.50 per assessable lot. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. in Minutes.) 12. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-240 IN THE FOLLOWING: against estimated cost of $.457 per He presented Analysis of Assessment against Sanitary Sewer Improve- Mr. Rosland presented Analysis construction No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. All streets in Danen’s Meadows Addition (See Resolution Ordering Assessments later Garden Avenue from Grove Street South to cul-de-sac Mr. Rosland presented total construction cost of $11,869.60, proposed to be assessed against 483.29 square feet at a cost 05. $2436 per assessable square foot, against estimated cost of $34.19 per square foot. heard and none had been received prior thereto. ment later in Minutes .) 13. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-245 IN THE FOLLOWING: Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $30,537.00, proposed to be assessed against 210,600 square feet at $.145 per assessable foot, against estimated assessment of $.228 per assessable foot. No objections were heard and none had been received Prim Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) . No objections were (See Resolution Ordering Assess- Vernon Court from Vernon Ave. to cul-de-sac thereto. (See Resolution 14. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-246 IN THE FOLLOWING: Village Drive from Cahill Road to cul-de-sac Nr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $31,889.28, proposed to be assessed against32townhouse units and 16 condominium units at $664.36 per assessable unit against $835.94 per assessable unit. objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering -Assessments later in Enutes.) No 15. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-247 IN THE FOLLOWING: West 72nd Street from Ohms Lane to Metro Blvd. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $370,647.21, proposed to be assessed against 760,648 feet (gross floor area) .e at s.456.21 per assessable foot and at $29.54 per assessable square foot ‘(abutting property) at $29.54 per assessable square foot, against estimated assessment of $.5096 per assessable square foot (gross floor area) and $33.600 per assessable square foot (abutting property). 16. STREET IMF’ROVEMENT NO. BA-249 IN THE FOLLOWING: Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $67,659.46, proposed to be assessed against 3075.43 assessable feet as estimated at $22.00 per assessable foot, with $95,963.51 being paid from State Aid funds. Note was made of a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Rod Hjermstad, 7460 Shannon Dr., who objected that the improvement does not specially benefit their property or enhance its value since the rear of their property which adj6iIlt. Pse-~~we3%1&~- Road is burdened by a recorded perpetual easement which provides for‘a fence owned by the Dewey Hill Homeowners Association. the meeting and objected to the proposed assessment. assessment policy of the City for improvements abutting side and back yards, advising that they are normally assessed for one-third of the footage. City Attorney Erickson advised that special asseksments must produce a benefit in terms of dollars of value added and that, even though property owners have no access to the street because of the private restriction, that private restric- tion could be changed without the knowledge of the City. He added that the Dewey Hill Road from Gleason Road to Delaney Blvd. Mr. Hjermstad was present at Mr. Hoffman’clarified the 9/20/82 16% r- m al 0 5 a City has no statutory authority to defer the assessment under this circumstance. Following considerable discussion, Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by Member Richards, continuing the hearing until October 4, 1982, so that the staff could look into the easement and possibly set up a policy for this type of lot. Motion carried unanimously. 17. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-17 IN THE FOLLOWING: Scriver Road from Blake Road to West line of Hyland Acres Addition Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $496.16, proposed to be assessed against 7 lots at at $70.88 per assessable lot against estimated assessment of $71.14. been received prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes .) No objections were heard and none had 18. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-18 IN THE FOLLOWING: Golf Terrace from Wooddale Ave. to Easterly Lakeview Drive Mr. Rosland presented total construction cost of $2,079.66, proposed to be assessed against 22 assessable lots at $94.53 per lot, against estimated assess- ment of $109.49. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) 19. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-21 IN THE FOLLOWING: Colonial Way and City Parking Lot Mr. Rosland presented total construction cost of $2,593.67, proposed to be assessed against one assessable lot at $2,593.67, against estimated assessment of $2,460.00. Mr. Hoffman pointed out that the proposed assessment was more costly because the cost of landscaping ran higher than anticipated. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. Minutes. ) (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in 20. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. E-30 IN THE FOLLOWING: Alley between Abbott and Beard Avenues from W. 58th Street to W. 59th Street Mr. Rosland presented total construction cost of $20,173.76, proposed to be assessed against 23 assessable lots at $877.12 per lot, and advised that the pro- posed assessment exceeded the estimated assessment of $783.74 because additional stone work was required. prior thereto. No objections were heard and none had been received (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) North entrance to Southdale Center on France Ave. South entrance to South- dale Center on France Ave. 21. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TS-5 IN THE FOLLOWING: Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $140,000.00, proposed to be assessed against two assessable units as estimated as fis110ws: $105,000.00 against Registered Land Survey,No. 1455 and $35,000.00 against Parcel 3240, Sec. 30, Township 28, Range 24. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) 22. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. B-87 IN THE FOLLOWING: T.H. 100 East Frontage Road from Hibiscus Ave. to W. 66th Street T.H. 100 West Frontage Road fr0m.Y. 70th St. to W. 66th Street Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $8,019.95, proposed to be assessed against 3678.89 assessable feet as estimated at $2.18 per foot. The owner of the lot on the corner of Larkspur Lane and the East Frontage Road was assured that his side frontage would be assessed on a one- third basis. No further discussion was heard and no objections had been received prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) 23. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-307 IN THE FOLLOWING: T.H. 100 West Frontage Road from W. 66th Street and Josephine Ave. South 875 feet+. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $23,604.15, proposed to be assessed against 4 lots for the lateral at $3,934.01 and against 15 >lots for the Sub-Trunk at $524.54. at $3,626.25 per assessable lot for the lateral and $659.32 per assessable lot for the Sub-Trunk. thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Assessments later in Minutes.) Estimated assessment was given No objections were heard and none had been received prior 24. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. B-89 IN THE FOLLOWING: France Ave. from 62nd Street Crosstown Highway to W. 70th Street. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost at $151,520.70, proposed to be assessed against 6416.83 lineal feet (commercial office) as estimated at $22.87 per lineal foot and against 476.78 lineal feet (residential) at $10.00 per lineal foot. Council was advised that this work was done by Hennepin County and that 20% engineering fees are always included in the construction cost. charges such high fees. been received prior thereto. utes. ) Mr. Hoffman said that he would check to see why the County No further discussion was heard and no objections had (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Min- 166 9/20/82 25. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-176 IN THE FOLLOWING: W. 56th Street from Dale Ave. to Hansen Rd. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $7,279.24, proposed to be assessed against 41 lotswiththe Westchester Apartments being assessed at $257.17 assessable lot. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) and all other lots being assessed at $171.27 per No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. 26. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMFXC NO. M-82 IN THE FOLLOWING: W. 50th Street and France Ave. Business District I Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $29,770.09, proposed to be assessed against 289,030 square foot at $0.103 per assessable square foot, against estimated assessment of $0.10 per square foot. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. tion Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) (See Resolu- 27. CONSTRUCTION OF 1981-1 IMPROVEMENT IN THE FOLLOWING: W. 78th Street as' it abutts the plat of Braewood Park Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $53,590.06, proposed to be assessed against three lots at $17,863.35. advised that this work was done by the City of Bloomington. No objections were heard and none had been received prior thereto. ment later in Minutes.) 5113 Schaefer Road Council was (See Resolution Ordering Assess- 28. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-1 IN THE FOLLOWING: Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $3,465.00, proposed to be assessed against one assessable lot. were heard and none had been received prior thereto. Assessment later in Minutes.) No objections (See Resolution Ordering 29. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-2 IN THE FOLLOWING: 5516 Knoll Drive Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $3,707.50, proposed to be assessed against one assessable lot. were heard and none had been received prior thereto. Assessment later in Minutes.) 30. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-3 IN THE FOLLOWING: Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of ' $2,490.00, proposed to be assessed against one lot. none had been received prior thereto. (See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) .Nb obJecfions (See Resolution Ordering I 5505 Knoll Drive No objections were heard and 31. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-4 IN THE FOLLOWING: 5400 Akers Lane Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $2,090.00, proposed to be assessed against one lot. and none had been received prior thereto. later in Minutes.) No objections were heard (See Resolution Ordering Assessment 32. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-5 IN THE FOLLOWING: Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $3,360.00,proposed to be assessed against one lot. and none had been received prior thereto. '(See Resolution Ordering Assessment later in Minutes.) 5239 West Highwood Road No objections were heard 33. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment showing total construction cost of $6,295.48, proposed to be assessed against 62 lots at $101.54 per assessable lot, against estimated assessment of $96.83. letter from Mr. France C. Quintana, P. 0. Box 647, La Jolla, CAY 92038, who con- tended that an effort should be made to stock the creek area with herbivirous fish, the presence of which would greatly contribute to the cleaning up of the water. Mr. Rosland advised the Council that these fish are not allowed by the D.N.R. in Minnesota. Member Bredesen said that Mr. John Pluhar, 4515 Browndale Ave., had indicated that he w6uld pay for the improvement this year but that he should not have to pay on any future assessment for the creek improvement. Nember Bredesen asked that, should such an assessment be considered in the future, the assessment district be reconsidered. Member Richards thereupon offered the follqwing resolution and moved its adoption: AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-82 IN THE FOLLOWING: Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond Area Council's attention was called to a I I 9 1201 82 167 RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF WATEWIN IMPROVEMENTS W-301, WM-340, WM-344, WM-345 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS NOS. ST.S-167, ST.S-168 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SS-356, SS-359, SS-360 GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENTS NOS. C-132 AND C-135 STREET IMPROVEMENTS BA-240 , BA-241 , BA-245 , BA-246 , BA-247 , A-176, E-30, B-89 CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT B-87 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT L-17, L-18, L-21 TmFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT NO. ' TS-5 MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT M-82 1981-1 IMPROVEMENT SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTIONS HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, HC-4, HC-5 AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-82 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of Edina, Minnesota, as folhws: 1. The City has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed assessment rolls for the improvements her.einafter referred to, and at such hearings held on September 20, 1982, has considered all oral and written ob- jections presented against the levy of such assessments. 2. Eash of the assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for the following improvements: Nos. WM-301, WM-340, WM-344, WM-345, Sanitary Sewer Improvements Nos. SS-356, SS-359, SS-360, Storm Sewer Improvements Nos. St.S-167, ST.S-168, Grading and Graveling Improvements Nos. C-132, C-135, Street Improvements Nos. BA-240, BA-241, BA-245, BA-246, BA-247, A-176, E-30, B-89, Curb and Gutter Improvement No. B-87, Street Lighting Improvements Nos; L-17, L-18, L-21, Traffic' Signal Improvement No. TS-5, Maintenance Improvement No. M-82, 1981-1 Improvement, Sanitary Sewer House Connections Nos. HC-1, HC-2, HC-3, HC-4, HC-5 and Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ-82 does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot, tract or parcel of land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective improvements to be spread against the benefited lots, parcels and traczs of land described therein. 3. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 7% per annum for all Sanitary Sewer House Connections and 11% for all remaining improvements, on the entire assessment from the date of December 31, 1983, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 1983. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: P Watermain Improvements m 00 c) m a I Number of Improvement WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-345 Number of Installments 3 Years SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-360 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S-168 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S-167 . GRADING & GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT C-135 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS-359 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-344 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. C-132 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO., SS-356 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-340 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-241 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-240 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-245 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-246 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-247 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-17 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-18 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L-21 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. E-30 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TS-5 CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. B-87 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM-307 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. B-89 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A-176 MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M-82 PROJECT NO. 1981-1 IMPROVEMENT SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-1 SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-2 SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-3 SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-4 SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC-5 AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ-82 3 Years 3 Years 3 Years 3 Years 3 Years 3 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 'Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 10 Years 1 Year 10 Years 6 Years 6 Years 6 Years 6 Years 6 Years 1 Year 9120182 4. a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resoErttion. 5. The Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may be payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any right- of-way as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said sect ion. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Resolution adopted. JOHNSON BUILDING COMPANY REZONING HEARING DATE SET. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, setting October 4, 1982, as from R-1 Residential District to PRD-3 Planned Residential District. As recommended by Mr..Hughes, hearing date for rezoning property generally located at 4600 France Ave. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINLTTES OF SEPTEMBER 14, 1982, REVIEI?ED. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, acknowledging Sections B and C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 14, 1982, and approving the following action taken in Section A: 1. Monday thru Friday be established on Indianola Ave. adjacent to the Covenant Church of Edina ; 2. That the North leg of the Braemar Perimeter Road be restriped to allow the demarkation of a walkway on the park side of the road; 3. That a pedestrian crosswalk be designated on W. 66th St. at Southdale Road connecting to the pedestrian walkway of Cornelia Park. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. That a parking restriction of one hour between 8:OO a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on GRACE CHURCH PARKING DISCUSSED; ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO BE CONSIDERED. Mr. Ros- land called Council's attention to a memorandum from Mr. Hughes, describing the expansion plans of Grace Church and the provisions of the Edina Zoning Ordinance which governs this expansion. Mr. Hughes advised that the church has indicated that its immediate pians involve the construction of additional surface park- ing across the rear portions of lots 3 thru 7, and recalled that the church has petitioned for the installation of a storm sewer in I?. 52nd Street which will accommodate the drainage needs for short term parking expansion as well as the utlimate long range plans. Member Richards expressed concern about the impact of the church's expansion on the neighborhood, recalling that Christ Presbyterian Church was denied expansion for its parking lot. Recalling that there is also concern about parking around the-Community Center, Member Bredesen's motion referring the matter to the staff and the Community Development and Planning Commission for consideration of new requirements when redrafting the Zoning Ordi- nance was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. I 1983 BUDGET MEETING DATE NOTED. ing had been set for September 22, 1982, at 7:OO p.m., in the Manager's Confer- ence Room. No action was taken. Mr. Rosland recalled that the next Budget Meet- BLOOMINGTON REZONING SOUTH OF TANGLEWOOD COURT PROTESTED. Council's attention was called to a letter from Mr. Jim Platt, 7723 Tanglewood Court, protesting, on behalf of all residents of Tanglewood Court, the possibility of any commercial zoning in the parcel in the City of Bloomington lying North of W. 78th Street. Mr. Allen Burdick, 7717 Tanglewood Court, distributed a map of the area indi- cating residents' further concern about property on the South side of I?. 78th St. Mrs. Burdick added that they are mostly concerned about the wooded area. Mr. Maurice Lava, 7706 Gleason Road, asked that no zoning change be permitted North of the Freeway, stating that none of the residents would have built their expensive homes if they had thought that there would be warehouses that close to 1 9120182 169 the are'a. Member Richards' motion was seconded by Member Bredesen, asking the staff to express objections to the City of Bloomington to.any:rezoning of land in the krea which was included in the Radisson land trade. -. Ayes:l Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays:] None Motioh carried. I CITY COMPLIMENTED ON BREDESEN PARK PATH AND THE BENTON AVENUE SIDEWALK. Member Turner hdvised that she had received favorable comments on the fact that the Bredesen Park pathway had been mowed and also on the Benton Ave. sidewalk East of Counfryside School. No formal action was taken. METROPObITAN COUNCIL MEETINGS NOTED.. ,Member Turner noted that the Metropolitan j is conducting meetings which will give municipal representatives an ity to meet and share their opinions with each other. No action was taken. MINNEGAFCO STREET PATCHING DISCUSSED. Member pchmidt, Mr. Hoffman said that he would talk to Minnegasco about the poor job they have done in two..locations in patching the street. DISEASED ELM TREES DISCUSSED. are abobt fifty diseased elm trees that he hopes can be removed before the snow In response to a concern expressed by Mr . Kojetin advised Member Bredesen that there P m al c') I . *m a RECYCLIhG COMMISSION MEETING NOTED. a teleppone call from Mr. Bob Reid, reminding him that the Recycling Commission will belmeeting at the City Hall on October 21, 1982, at 7:OO a.m. to discuss the collection of refuse in residential areas. remind the Council of this meeting at a later date. Member Richards advised that he had received , The Mayor asked Ms. Smith to No action was taken. SOIL A6 WATER CONSERVATION' DISTRICT SERVICES QUESTIONED. that a Zetter had been written for his signature to Commissioner Richard Kremer, The Mayor advised questiobing the benefit to Edina of the Soil and Water Conservation District (in view of the fact that Edina lies within the jurisdiction of both the Nine Following discussion, it was informally agreed that the letter as written by Mr. Hilgpes should be signed by the Mayor and conveyed to the Soil and Water Con- servation District. ICE ARENA ENERGY CONSERVATION EFFORTS NOTED. Board Minutes in which Mr. Larry Thayer and his staff were commended on their energy ponservation efforts and said that the Council's commendation should also be added. Council informally concurred with Member Bredesen's recommendation, and aslyAd Mr. Kojetin to convey the Council's . .- appreciation. ART IN LHE PARK PRAISED. Mr. Rosland commented on the excellent Art in the Park projecq and asked Mr. Kojetin to convey his congratulations to all those who made tlqe project a success. I ' Mile Creek Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District). Member Bredesen referred to Park l BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE SEWER SYSTEM REPLACEMENT BIDS TO BE TAKEN. Advising that the Braemar Golf Course sewer system has failed, Mr. Rosland presented an esti- mate for construction of Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. P-82-10 at $79,652.10 and asked permission to take bids so that work could be completed before the end of the construction season. of bids 1 was seconded by Member Schmidt. Member Bredesen's motion authorizing the taking Ayes:i Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. EDINAMITE SIGNS APPROVED. able signs advextising the Edinamite benefit. fortable asking for special favors for the City, Mr. Rosland suggested that Mrs. Alison Fuhr was present to request use of port- Stating that he would not be com- temporary signs could be used. Mrs. Fuhr was thanked for her efforts er promote Edinamite as well as her other concerns for the City which expressed in the past. 1 0 ORDINANCE NO. 73145ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Member Tumer offered the fol- lowing Ordinance for Second Reading and moved its adoption: I I 9120182 ORDINANCE NO. 731-A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 731 TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS AND ESTABLIS8 ADDITIONAL LICENSING CATEGORIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1 of Ordinance No. 731 is hereby amended by inserting the following between the definitions of "Food Vehicle" and "Health Officer": Section 1. "Food Warehouse" means a food establishment in which purchased food is stored but not offered for retail sale and in which no other food handling activities take place. Sec. 2. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 731 is hereby amended by inserting the "Packaged Food Sales" means a food establishment in which the retail sale of prepacked food products (including by way of example and not by way of limitation, freeze dried meals). for off-premises preparation and/or consump- tion occurs and the primary business of which food establishment is other than food and food product sales. Sec. 3. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 731 is hereby amended by inserting the "Take Out Service'' means a food establishment in which food is prepared on the primises but is sold to be consumed off the premises and which* does not allow the consumption of food on or near the premises. Sec. 4. Section 5 of Ordinance No. 731 is hereby amended to read as Sec. 5. License Fees. Fees for licenses issued hereunder shall be as Food Establishment (except as hereinafter provided in this Section 5): $175.00 per annum, plus $50.00 for each additional facility on the same premises, except that food establishments in which the preparation and sale of food is secondary to the principal business operated on the premises and which provide no sit-down facilities for the consumption of food on the premises shall pay $75.00 per annum. I following between the definitions of "Misbranding" and "Perishable Food": following between the definitions of "Smooth" and "Utensils'"! follows : follows : Itinerent Food Establishment: Retail Candy Shop: $15.00 per annum, plus $5.00 for each additional facility on the same premises, as set forth above with respect to food establishments. Readily Perishable Food Vehicle: Perishable Food Vehicles: Bakery Food Vehicle: Catering Food Vehicle: additional catering food vehicle under the same ownership and operation. $15.00 per event. $20.00 per annum. Fleet of 5 or more Readily $100 .OO per annum. $15.00 per annum. $100.00 per annum plus $5.00 per'annum for each Perishable Food Vehicle: Food Vehicles: $100.00 per annum. $20.00 per annum. Fleet of 5 or more-Perishable Food Vending Machine: Ice Vending Machine: ice in a wrapped container. Food Warehouse: As provided in Ordinance Ho. 171. Packaged Food Sales: As provided in Ordinance No. 171. Takeout Service: As provided in Ordinance No. 171. Sect. 5. and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall : Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Ordinance adopted. $15.00 per annum. $5.00 per annum for each machine dispensing or storing $15.00 per annum for all other ice machines. This ordinance shall be in full .force and effect upon its passage Mayor k?zG?w+- ATTEST : $L €4 7&/ City *Clerk LIQUOR REPORT as of July 31, 1982, was presented, reviewed and ordered placed on file by motion of Member Richards, seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. 0 CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Schmidt was seconded by Member Richards for pay- ment of the following Claims as per Pre-List dated September 20, 1982: General Fund, $15,672.43; Park Fund, $22,527.65; Art Fund, $3,162.31; Swimming Pool, $121.60; Golf Course, $8,318.58; Recreation Center, $69.25; Gun Range, $940.00; Water Fund, $5,535.83; Sewer Fund, $2,104.94; Liquor Fund, $24,246.55; Con- 9/20/89 struction, $606.05; Total, $83,305.19; and for confirmation of payment of the following Claims: General Fund, $152,207.50; Park Fund , $2,386.82; Art Center, $329.10; Swimming Pool, $8,928.98; Golf Course, $8,071.02; Arena, $1,832.04; Gun Club, $98.03; Water Fund, $3,299.71; Sewer Sund, $713.79; Liquor Fund, $428,293.44; Total, $606,160.43. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. Council's agenda having been covered, Member Schmidt's motion for adjournment was seconded by Member Turner and carried.'. Adjournment at 9:15 p.m. City Clerk 3- h, .